Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Argument Against
¿luT.ð'" Ç)eo. fe; 1),,\1 6 / 2"0 I "Ji...,;.cl;ci.'6"': G,6/tJ£-", Gtdi,etA>- ¡µ';ylC:.#If/YltiÂi4;V1£.t:i '6 S-.ie, Cé'MA ~ t. b~ (M1...~'¡("e-d to fI.A C7 1 ~ Garden Gate Home Owners' Argument Against Measure XXX ' We. are~ cool;t;on o£ new andJong,-time.I'rlIrcl"n Gate \ home owners who are against the annexation.of the ChJrcl"n rrllt" "nmmnn;ty by th" ,,;ty ofrnp"rt;nn The reasons an~ outlined below: ') 1-}- ThE'! pntPnt1~1 np.gfIf;vp impArt of AnnpYAti~n to property value in the area as .r.e-development.of the area CO'lld he ~lnule¡j by tbe mnre rC".~';ct;vf city building permit procedures, especially for new bo'lses or hn;1cI;ng~ cI"vioting frnm ~odes. 2) Less piWacy under city s ~requir.eme.nt - -6 feet versus county's 10 feet.. TTnder city co4es, a house with bay windows, ~1aces,.& gaOOen windows can bave ."hlp hod, nfl".. thon 4 f""t frn", our neighbor's,property. During.the hot summer season, your family con e~.ily h"or YO'lr n";gI>hnr~' daily intimate s~ and activities. 3.) AnnpYSIIt;nn rinp.~ not g.Ul'rAntpp. thE'! rity nfrllp~rtino will proville better service, new sidewalk, lighting, street "',,on;n8, pol;c" prot""t;o~, etc. 4) The Gaµien Gate area bas al"'ays.bee.n.a cO·lpty.are.a withn11f Any npg~tivp. pfTPl't nn itQ rpQicipnt!i: There are no compelling reasons to.cllange. 5.}-We dn not want to bave oclcl;t;nnal f""., .,\ch as City ofCl1pertino Utility Users' tax,StormDrainagC" ~p.rvil'P Fpp. Hl1Q1nPQQ T il'PnQp' Fp.p. , mŒ © Œ o"Tfœ-rw ~1 AUG - 6 2001 æJ I ~ fGl FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY AUTHOR(S) OF ARGUMENT The ersigned proponent(s) or author(s) ofthe ~rebuttal) argument (in favor 0£1 gainst ballot measure _ at the special mun~ection for the city of Cupertino to be lie on November 6, 2001, hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of his /her/their knowledge and belief. Sr¿ !l;"QQ.~~- ~/~ Date 1-1(-0 ( g--'1-ð( 7·- 4-01 I )71~·m. ~ ~~ ~ tf ~ '</!Jtmd!ú g-'f-n¡ (If the proponents/authors choose to use this form, they must still sign the argument) 1- 4-DI fi)Œ œiì Ii ITi! r~i ~1 AUG ~ 6 2001 I~!. ~-Z^ ~¿