CC 05-16-2023 Item No. 6 City Manager's Third Quarter Financial Report for 2022-23_Written CommunicationsCC 05-02-2023
Written Communications
Item #6
Consider the City Manager's
Third Quarter Financial
Report for 2022-23
From:Rhoda Fry
To:City Clerk; City Council
Subject:Cupertino City Council May 16 #6 regarding the 3rd quarter
Date:Monday, May 15, 2023 8:51:04 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council,
Cupertino City Council May 16 #6 regarding the 3rd quarter
I am very surprised to see the new city hall still listed on these reports and I am concerned to see it
bundled with improvements to community hall.
These items need to be kept separate.
How much was wi-fi being used in the City’s public areas? I see that it has been cancelled. I don’t use
it but I can see that it could be a quality of life item for people to get outside.
Regarding attachment C. Please provide a full accounting for fund 280 – the park dedication fee. I
recall it had been around $12M. Why is it $8M now? Where did the money come from and what can
it be used for?
Moving forward to the 4th quarter, please start cutting costs now.
Sell Byrne.
Get TOT increase on ballot for 2023.
Thanks,
Rhoda Fry
From:Peggy Griffin
To:Thomas Leung; Pamela Wu; City Council
Cc:City Clerk
Subject:2023-05-16 City Council Agenda Item #6 - City Manager"s 3rd Qtr Budget Amendment Proposal - BUDGET QUESTION
Date:Sunday, May 14, 2023 7:12:20 PM
Attachments:Agreement 19-082 City of Sunnyvale, Cost Sharing Agreement, VERBS Project at Homestead High School.pdf
2019-07-16 CC Mtg Item26 Att D - Budget Detail Modified.pdf
CC 04-13-23 Item #2 Accounts Payable_Supplemental Report (Updated 04-12-23).pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AND ATTACHMENTS AS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM LISTED
ABOVE.
Dear City Manager Wu, City Council and Staff,
Below is a question I have asked multiple times but it’s not been answered. In the 4-13-2023 CC Meeting Item #2 Accounts Payable
Supplemental Report the city’s response was “It’s a budget-related question that will be addressed when the City Manager’s
proposed budget is considered by Council.”
So, I’m asking again…
Q: Why was the Homestead High School Bike/Ped Improvement amount of $126,500 charged to “100 – General Fund” instead of to
the Walk Audit CIP fund or another CIP fund?
I keep asking this because there is a fixed amount of money in the Walk Audit CIP Fund. This Homestead HS project was presented as
a Walk Audit CIP project. Recently, I’d heard there was only about $68k left in the fund. If that’s the case, the $126,500 would have
made it go negative so charging the General Fund instead avoids the issue of going over budget or having to get Council approval to
amend the budget or having to cut back on projects. Below are supporting documents and information.
I would very much appreciate an answer to this question. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
This City Council agenda item #6 is the City Manager’s proposed budget amendment so I’m asking again…now with additional
information I’ve found. Attached are 2 supporting documents:
1. CC 04-13-23 Item #2 Accounts Payable_Supplemental Report (Updated 04-12-23).pdf
2. Agreement 19-082 City of Sunnyvale, Cost Sharing Agreement, VERBS Project at Homestead High School.pdf
This shows the City of Cupertino agreed to pay $126,500 for their part of the bike/ped improvements.
3. 2019-07-16 City Council Mtg, Agenda Item #26, FY19-20 Bike-Ped CIP, Attachment D – Budget Detail Modified.pdf
Page 2 of this shows that for the Homestead HS Bike/Ped Improvement Project, “Cupertino to contribute $126,500
from Walk Audit CIP”
CIP projects have a fund number of 420, not 100
Page 2 of 2 of 2019-07-16 CC Mtg, Agenda Item #26, FY19-20 Bike-Ped CIP
The Accounts Payables for the Period Ending Feb. 10, 2023 (bottom of the page), paid the City of Sunnyvale $126,500.00 as the City
of Cupertino’s share of the improvements as per the signed agreement between the two cities but it was charged to “100 – General
Fund” instead of
Payment Register for Period Ending Feb. 10, 2023
Page 1 and 2 of 19
The 2023-05-16 CC Meeting Agenda Item #6, Attachment I – CIP Projects Ranking May 2023.pdf shows that School Walk Audit
Implementations are “Fully funded by outside sources. No use of City funds anticipated…”
Attachment I – CIP Projects Ranking May 2023.pdf
Page 4 of 6
COST-SHARING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND
CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A VEHICLE EMISSION REDUCTIONS BASED AT
SCHOOLS (VERBS) FUNDED PROJECT AT HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL
THIS AGREEMENT, for convenience dated P 161 A) , 2019, is
entered into by and between the CITY OF SUNNYVALE, a municipal corporation of
the State of California, referred to herein as "SUNNYVALE" and the CITY OF
CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein
as "CUPERTINO."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, SUNNYVALE received a Vehicle Emission Reductions Based at
Schools ("VERBS") grant from the VTA for the purpose of increasing walking and
bicycling to school to reduce greenhouse gases and improve air quality.
SUNNYVALE and CUPERTINO are partnering to perform pedestrian and bicycle
improvements on Homestead Road at Homestead High School (the "PROJECT"),
more specifically defined in Exhibit A, which is incorporated by this reference.;
and,
WHEREAS, CUPERTINO submitted a letter of support (Exhibit B) to provide
matching funds in an amount not to exceed 10% of the total PROJECT cost; and,
WHEREAS, SUNNYVALE passed a Resolution of Local Support (Exhibit C)
indicating it will provide its non-federal matching funds.
WHEREAS, CUPERTINO's letter of support has been accepted and by virtue
of the parties' execution of this Agreement, SUNNYVALE will provide PROJECT
services to Cupertino under the terms of this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION I
SUNNYVALE AGREES:
1) To provide PROJECT advertisement, bid procurement, contract award,
contract administration, and all necessary construction engineering services
for the PROJECT.
2) Prior to advertisement for construction of PROJECT, to submit plans and
specifications to CUPERTINO for review and concurrence as to conformity to
Page 1 of 4
CUPERTINO'S standards and/or existing facilities with respect to the portion
of the PROJECT work scope that will be done in CUPERTINO.
3) To provide for the construction of PROJECT by contract in accordance with
the mutually agreed upon plans and specifications.
4) To provide one hundred percent (100%) of the expense of preparation of plans
and specifications, construction engineering, construction costs and
necessary traffic signal equipment purchase required to complete the
PROJECT, offset by the partial reimbursement by CUPERTINO as set forth
below. Currently, the total PROJECT cost estimate is $1,265,000.
5) To operate and maintain the PROJECT upon completion. SUNNYVALE shall
pay for all costs of maintenance and operation of the traffic control signal
system and safety lighting.
SECTION II
CUPERTINO AGREES:
1) Prior to award of contract for construction of PROJECT, CUPERTINO shall
review the plans and specifications for conformity to CUPERTINO'S
standards and/or existing facilities for the portion of the PROJECT that will
be located within CUPERTINO.
2) Upon completion of PROJECT, CUPERTINO shall reimburse SUNNYVALE
ten percent (10%) of the total PROJECT cost, but in an amount not to exceed
126,500, within thirty (30) days of invoicing from SUNNYVALE.
SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1) SUNNYVALE shall not approve a contract for the construction of PROJECT
until after receipt of CUPERTINO'S approval of the plans and specifications
required in SECTIONS I and II, above.
2) Neither SUNNYVALE nor any officer, agent or employee thereof shall be
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done
or omitted by CUPERTINO under or in connection with any work, authority,
or jurisdiction delegated to CUPERTINO under this Agreement. It is also
agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CUPERTINO shall
fully indemnify and hold SUNNYVALE harmless from any liability imposed
for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted by CUPERTINO under or in connection
Page 2 of 4
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CUPERTINO under this
Agreement.
3) Neither CUPERTINO nor any officer, agent or employee thereof shall be
responsible for and damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done
or omitted by SUNNYVALE under or in connection with any work, authority
or jurisdiction delegated to SUNNYVALE under this Agreement. It is also
agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, SUNNYVALE shall
fully indemnify and hold CUPERTINO harmless from any liability imposed
for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by
reasons of anything done or omitted by SUNNYVALE under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to SUNNYVALE under this
Agreement.
4) Should any portion of PROJECT be financed with Federal funds or State Gas
Tax funds, all applicable procedure and policies relating to the use of such
funds shall apply notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement.
5) In the construction of the work, SUNNYVALE will furnish a representative to
perform the usual functions of a Resident Engineer. CUPERTINO may, at no
cost to SUNNYVALE, furnish a representative, if they so desire. The
representative and Resident Engineer will cooperate and consult with each
other, but the orders of SUNNYVALE'S engineer shall be final.
6) If existing public and private utilities conflict with the construction of
PROJECT, SUNNYVALE and CUPERTINO will make all necessary
arrangements with the owners of such utilities for their removal, vacation or
relocation. Encroachment permits will be issued by either SUNNYVALE or
CUPERTINO, depending upon the location of the utility for which removal is
required by the PROJECT. All private utilities and public utilities not owned
by either SUNNYVALE or CUPERTINO, shall be required to remove or relocate
at their own cost. The cost of removing or relocating public utilities owned
by either SUNNYVALE or CUPERTINO shall be shared equally by the two
cities.
7) CUPERTINO hereby grants to SUNNYVALE and its agents and contractors
all necessary authority to perform the PROJECT, as approved by
CUPERTINO, within the boundaries of CUPERTINO, any and all work
required to perform the terms of this Agreement, as approved by
CUPERTINO, and agrees to provide such documentation as may be required
by CUPERTINO to confirm such authority.
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF CUPERTINO CITY OF SUNNYVALE
By: By: -J `L
City Manager City Manager
Attest Attes
City Clerk S^Z(`' City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED A5 TO FORM:
City Attorney City Attorney
Page 4 of 4
Exhibit A
Santa Clara Valley
aura Transportation
Authority
Vehicle Emissions Reductions Based at Schools
VERBS)
FY2018-22 Application
INCLUDES:
Section One - Project Overview
Section Two - Project Details
Section Three - Project Narrative
VERBS Application
SECTION ONE
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Homestead Road @ Homestead High School Pedestrian
Project Title and Bicycle Improvements Project
Location
Intersection of Homestead Road &South Mary Avenue
Limits
Homestead Road between Mackenzie Drive and
Kennewick Drive including influence areas on all
approaches within 250 ft.
Detailed Description
This is a joint project with the City of Cupertino, the
Fremont Unified High School District, the Homestead
High School and the City of Sunnyvale. The proposed
improvements at Homestead Road/Mary Avenue and
Homestead Road/Kennewick Drive intersections, will
update the phasing from 6 phase to 8 phase at the Mary
Avenue intersection, allowing protected left turns for the
Project Description Summary northbound and southbound directions and timing the
Specify need and expected outcome) pedestrian crosswalks concurrently; tighten the radius of
the south-west corner of the intersection, shortening the
south and west pedestrian crosswalks; provide direct
path for bicycles to high school from EB Homestead Road
to Mary Avenue Bridge Trail, install high visibility
crosswalks in all directions, install accessible pedestrian
system push buttons; upgrade existing traffic signal to
allow for in and out circulation at Kennewick Drive signal
and install high visibility crosswalks. Additionally, the
project will install green buffered bike lane between
McKenzie Drive and Mary Avenue on the south side,
install green buffered bike lane between Mary Avenue
and Kennewick Drive on the north side (south side
already has a green buffered bike lane), and update
bicycle specific detection in all directions.
Grant Amount Requested (min $500,000) $1,000,000
Fiscal Year (FY) Grant Funds Requested 2018-19
Local Match (11.47% Min) 265,000
Total Project Cost 1,265,000
Member Agency City of Sunnyvale
Page 1
VERBS Application
Contact Person Shahid Abbas
Address 456 W. Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Email Address sabbas@sunnyvale.c.ca.gov
Phone 408) 730-7330
Other Project Partners City of Cupertino, the Fremont Unified High School
District, and the Homestead High School.
Page 12
VERBS Application
SECTION TWO
PROJECT DETAILS
PROJECT TITLE:
Homestead Road @ Homestead High School Signal Modifications and Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements
AGENCY NAME:Agency with day-to-day responsibility for implementing PROJECT)
City/Town of: Sunnyvale
PROJECT MANAGER: (Person who can answer questions about the PROJECT)
Name: Shahid Abbas
Title: Transportation Manager
Phone: 408) 730-7330
Email: sabbas@sunnyvale.ca.gov
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION AND SITED SOURCE:
Homestead Road is classified as an Other Principal Arterial and South Mary Avenue is a Minor Arterial
according to the California Roadway System map developed by Caltrans with FHWA approval.
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Project Phase: ENVIRON DESIGN ROW CON
Start Date (MM/YY): 1 12018-2019 2019-2020
Any schedule change requires VTA prior approval.
PROJECT COST BY PHASE: (Dollars rounded to nearest thousands)
Funds Requested: 0 1M
Local Match: 213,000 52,000
Total cost/phase: 213,000 1,052,000
Match % (xx.xx%): 100% 5%
CRITICAL EXPECTED/ACTUAL SUBMITTAL DATES: (where applicable)
Field Review: 01/01/2019
PES Form: 01/01/2019 PES: Exhibit 6-A Preliminary Environmental Study
ROW/Permits:
CON E-76 Packet' 03/01/2019
Deadline: November 1 of programmed year
N PROJECT IS A STAND-ALONE PROJECT.
PROJECT IS PART OF A LARGER PROJECT. (Describe larger project: Provide project title, identifying
ID numbers, total project cost, larger project schedule and impact on THIS project schedule.)
Page 13
VERBS Application
SECTION THREE
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Use Section Three to respond to the Evaluation Criteria and Procedures for the Infrastructure
Improvements found in Attachment A)
SCREENING CRITERIA
Provide Letters of Support from school officials, school-based associations, local traffic engineers, local
elected officials, law enforcement agencies, and any other stakeholders that will inform the evaluation
process and any ancillary information that will inform the evaluation process.
SCORING CRITERIA
1. Infrastructure improvements to school access (Proof of current conditions and map included?)
This joint project with the City of Cupertino, the Fremont Unified High School District, the Homestead
High School and the City of Sunnyvale will make improvements at the Intersections of Homestead Road
South Mary Avenue and Homestead Road & Kennewick Drive is located directly adjacent to
Homestead High School, and is partially located in the City of Cupertino Right-of-Way. Both traffic
signals are owned and operated by the City of Sunnyvale. At the intersection of Mary Avenue, the
south leg of the intersection serves as the entrance point to the school and leads to the Staff and
visitor parking area. In the morning, parents also use this parking lot as a student drop off zone.
Additionally, there is a Bike Path that runs north-south from Mary Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian
Bridge to Mary Avenue Intersection. At the intersection of Kennewick Drive, the south leg of the
intersection serves as the entrance point to student parking lot. The surrounding area is primarily
residential, with posted 35 mph speed limit on Homestead Road and Mary Avenue, and 25 mph on
Kennewick Drive. As a result, there is a lot of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic that passes
through both intersections, especially in the morning and afternoon school peak hours.
Currently, the intersection of Homestead Road and Mary Avenue operates as a 6 phase, with protected
left turns in the eastbound and westbound directions, and split phasing in the northbound and
southbound directions. The northbound and southbound pedestrian crosswalks are also working in
split phase operation, and are timed with each respective vehicular direction (i.e. east crosswalk with
NB movement and west crosswalk with SB movement). Due to split phase operation of the crosswalks
and the wide crossing distances, the current cycle length is very long, which results in excessive delays
and queues for the vehicular traffic and student traffic that are coming to and from school. The
excessive delays increase the risk of pedestrians crossing the road to the school without waiting the
walk signal creating unsafe situations for all roadway users.
The proposed improvements at this intersection, will update the phasing from 6 phase to 8 phase,
allowing protected left turns for the northbound and southbound directions, and timing the pedestrian
crosswalks concurrently. Additionally, the improvements include tightening the radius of the south-
west corner of the intersection, installation the connector from Homestead Road to Mary Avenue
Bridge bike trail to provide a quicker access to the trail and to reduce pedestrian/bicycle conflict at the
intersection, shorten the south and west pedestrian crosswalks, installation of the high visibility
crosswalks in all directions, installation of accessible pedestrian system push buttons, installation of
Page 14
VERBS Application
buffered bike lane and green pavement along Homestead Road between MacKenzie Drive and South
Mary Avenue and between Mary Avenue and Kennewick Drive on the north side of the roadway, to
match the south side. As part of the separate project and the City's ongoing effort and commitment to
make a bicycle friendly community, a green bike lane with a bike box will be installed along South
Mary Avenue, north of Homestead Road.
The intersection of Homestead Road and Kennewick Drive, currently operates as a 5-phase
intersection, with protected left turns in the eastbound and westbound directions, and only one
southbound phase. This entrance is used by both, students who are looking for parking and parents
who are dropping off their kids. In the AM peak hour,there is a heavy volume of vehicles entering and
leaving this parking lot, with vehicles that are leaving,turning right on Homestead Road and
immediately left on Kennewick Drive. This results in delays and backup on school parking lot and on
Homestead Road, as vehicles are blocking through lanes.
The proposed improvements at this intersection will update signal phasing from 5-phase to 6-phase,
allowing for either split operation or permissive operation for the Northbound and Southbound
movement. Because currently the northbound movement does not exist, the project will install the
traffic signal infrastructure for future reconfiguration of the school parking lot by the school. With
reconfiguration the vehicular traffic will be able to exist the parking lot at a signalized intersection,
reducing the traffic exiting and entering the secondary driveway, and thus reducing conflict zones with
traffic traveling along Homestead Road. Additionally to signal modification, the current project will
install high visibility crosswalks in all directions, install accessible pedestrian system push buttons, and
install countdown pedestrian signal heads.
In December of 2016 the City of Cupertino along with Alta Planning+ Design consultant, conducted a
walk audit, which outlined most of the improvements described above.
The city of Sunnyvale also conducted several meetings between the City of Cupertino, Cupertino
School District, and Homestead High School officials, to discuss the improvements and seek comments.
As a result of this effort,the above mentioned improvements have been revised and are depicted in
the Figure 1.
2. Air Quality Improvements
The project is proposing to reduce vehicular emissions by reducing vehicular delays and queues at both
intersections. Furthermore, the project will enhance the safety, convenience, and comfort for the
students and their families walking and biking to school, and will encourage others to use other mode
of transportation, such as bicycle, or walk to school.
3. Gap Closure/Connectivity(Map included?)
The project proposes to shorten the crossing distances for pedestrians crossing the west and south
crosswalks, as well as installation of green bike lanes and green dashed transition along north leg of
South Mary Avenue.
Page 1 5
VERBS Application
Additional gap closure includes installation of buffered bike lane on the north side of the street
between South Mary Avenue and Kennewick Drive, to match what is already installed on the south
side of the street, and providing a connector for bicycles to enter Mary Avenue Bridge trail.
See Figure 1 for proposed intersection improvements.
4. Safety
The project is proposing to shorten the crossing distances for pedestrian which in turn reduce the
pedestrian-vehicular conflict, reduce the vehicular to vehicular conflict by reconfiguring entrance and
exit points, install accessible pedestrian systems pedestrian detectors, provide up to date signage,
install high visibility crosswalks, green bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, and install up to date bicycle
specific detection.
Enhanced bicycle lanes are planned for Homestead Road as part of the project. The bike lane
enhancements will include buffer bike lanes and/or colored bike lane treatments.The National
Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) website lists several safety benefits of colored bike
facilities based on an analysis of previous installations including:
Increases the visibility of bicyclists.
Increases motorist yielding behavior.
Helps reduce bicycle conflicts with turning motorists.
In addition, NACTO recommends the use of buffered bike lanes for roadways with high travel speeds.
These bicycle lane enhancements are expected to increase bike ridership within the project area, while
increasing safety for bicycle riders.
5. Local Match
This joint project with the City of Cupertino, the Fremont Unified High School District, the Homestead
High School and the City of Sunnyvale. The 21% local match will be equally split between the City of
Cupertino and the City of Sunnyvale.
6. Project Readiness (within 5 years)
The Homestead High School Walk Audit Recommendations was completed in December of 2016 which
provides recommendations for improvements. The next step in the process is to prepare the
environmental documents which can begin immediately once funding has been granted. No additional
R-O-W will be required for the project improvements and the project can be implemented relatively
quickly.
7. Community of Concern (Map included?)
The project is not location within a Community of Concern.
Page 1 6
VERBS Application
8. Local Plans(s)
The current project is part of the City of Sunnyvale Bicycle Plan and General Plan. The City of Cupertino
will incorporate all Walk Audit recommendations including the one Alta provided for Homestead High
School into their Pedestrian Master Plan that is currently being updated.
Page 1 7
J
1 i O
O cn
I U Z
W
W
maa ao I 1 j j I I o N
j mg NOIM3NN3N I l_ 1
I 1 I I Q a o O
axo 1 I I I
I I oj Q W
a. ca I L F—
gnm Wa5wWJ
r--- ----7
0
I I 0 Q 0 Z
q I Q Q
I I O z
m=wa Q
o~ 0
I I I I 'Al1_Rw I
Z m Oai W (n
1 I 1 _"kr'' I WwMm H W
C 0
1 I >(" I 05 W W
I ao o O
I II
c ww
I
I:
1
Z
o WmY I
I N
J 3
Sao 1
1DI
1 y==< 1
i_sl
I I oa
L ---- — I x on 1
3AVAaVW I I
I ct E<=a 1
I
1 I
Mm.0 I Y 1
1
JLd
ZCKowa
M
O 1
wz L------------- ------- ---------J
mm.
zjz
U)mZo
i 1 I z c
yi'
w a g
zo~_
I oCOI)
zoy
1 I I OILmE 0ZUI
I I am coic aka
61131ZIDOM 1 1 N j W o a W j
I I ? 5} Yw
z; m S
I a oxo11smo
I 1
o Ir
I I ago11
In
Exhibit B
CITY OF City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino,CA 95014-3255
408)777-3193
FAX(408)777-3366
CUPERTINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
April 28, 2017
Shahid Abbas
Transportation and Traffic Manager
Department of Public Works
City of Sunnyvale
456 W Olive Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
RE: Vehicle Emissions Reduction Based at School (VERBS) Grant Application
for the City of Sunnyvale
Dear Mr. Abbas,
I am writing to express my strong support for the City of Sunnyvale VERBS
Program Grant Application for the Homestead Road/Homestead High School
Improvements Project.
We feel this project is incredibly important because the proposed improvements
will help Homestead High School in the following areas:
i
1. Increase the numbers of children who walk and bicycle to school
2. Reduce vehicle congestion at school
3. Contribute to a healthier environment by reducing motorized travel
With the support of the VERBS program Partnership, the City of Sunnyvale, the
City of Cupertino, the Homestead High School, and the Fremont Union High
School District are looking forward to working together to reduce vehicular trips
by making infrastructure improvements which will provide better access to the
school and will inspire more children and their families to walk or bike to and
from school.
The City of Cupertino is committed to contribute up to,10% of the total project
cost, subject to City Council approval. We are very ek'cited and look forward to
this partnership and working with the City of Sunnyvale to realize the proposed
improvements.
Sincerely,
Timm Borden
Director of Public Works
Exhibit C
I eassft ol at;a,jrw Mpy
RESOLUTION OF LOCAL SUPPORT J
RESOLUTION NO. 861-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SUNNYVALE AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN
APPLICATION FOR FUNDING ASSIGNED TO
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MTC) FOR HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL AND
PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS AND COMMITTING THE NECESSARY
NON-FEDERAL MATCH AND STATING THE
ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, City of Sunnyvale (herein referred to as APPLICANT) is submitting an
application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for $1,919,000 in funding
assigned to MTC for programming discretion, which includes federal funding administered by
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and federal or state funding administered by the
California Transportation Commission (CTC) such as Surface Transportation Block Grant
Program (STP) funding, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
funding, Transportation Alternatives (TA) set-aside/Active Transportation Program (ATP) j
funding, and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) funding (herein collectively
referred to as REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING) for the Homestead Road at
Homestead High School Improvements and Pedestrian and Bike Infrastructure Improvements
herein referred to as PROJECT) for the One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG 2) for Vehicle
Emission Reductions Based at Schools (VERBS) (herein referred to as PROGRAM); and
WHEREAS,the United States Congress from time to time enacts and amends legislation
to provide funding for various transportation needs and programs, (collectively, the FEDERAL
TRANSPORTATION ACT) including, but not limited to the Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program (STP) (23 U.S.C. § 133), the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality I
Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 U.S.C. § 149) and the Transportation Alternatives (TA) set-
aside (23 U.S.C. § 133); and
WHEREAS, state statutes, including California Streets and Highways Code §182.6,
182.7, and §2381(a)(1), and California Government Code §14527, provide various funding
programs for the programming discretion of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and j
the Regional Transportation Planning Agency(RTPA); and
i
WHEREAS,pursuant to the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT, and any regulations
promulgated thereunder, eligible project sponsors wishing to receive federal or state funds for a
regionally-significant project shall submit an application first with the appropriate MPO, or
RTPA, as applicable, for review and inclusion in the federal Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP); and
T-DPW-170203/24049 2 1
Council Agenda: 1-23-18
Item No.: 11
WHEREAS, MTC is the MPO and RTPA for the nine counties of the San Francisco Bay
region; and
WHEREAS, MTC has adopted a Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC
Resolution No. 3606, revised) that sets out procedures governing the application and use of
REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and
WHEREAS, APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY
FUNDING; and
WHEREAS, as part of the application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING,
MTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the
following:
i. the commitment of any required matching funds;and
ii. that the sponsor understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING
is fixed at the programmed amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be
expected to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY
FUNDING; and
iii. that the PROJECT will comply with the procedures, delivery milestones and
funding deadlines specified in the Regional Project Funding Delivery PolicyMTCResolutionNo. 3606,revised); and
iv. the assurance of the sponsor to complete the PROJECT as described in the
application, subject to environmental clearance, and if approved, as included in
MTC's federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and
V. that the PROJECT will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete
the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and
vi. that the PROJECT will comply with all project-specific requirements as set forth
in the PROGRAM; and
vii. that APPLICANT has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all
FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency
and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA),MTC, Caltrans,
FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during
the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded
transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and
viii. in the case of a highway project, the PROJECT will comply with MTC Resolution
No. 4104, which sets forth MTC's Traffic Operations System (TOS) Policy to
install and activate TOS elements on new major freeway projects; and
WHEREAS, the APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL
DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the
funds; and
WHEREAS, there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely
affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT; and
T-DPW-170203/24049 2 2
Council Agenda: 1-23-18
Item No.: IT
i
WHEREAS, APPLICANT authorizes its City Manager, or designee to execute and file
an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT asreferencedinthisresolution; and
WHEREAS, MTC requires that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the MTC in
conjunction with the filing of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFSUNNYVALETHAT:
1. APPLICANT will provide any required matching funds; and
2. APPLICANT understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING i
for the project is fixed at the MTC approved programmed amount, and that any
cost increases must be funded by the APPLICANT from other funds, and that
APPLICANT does not expect any cost increases to be funded with additional
REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and j
3. APPLICANT understands the funding deadlines associated with these funds and
will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Regional Project Funding
Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) and APPLICANT has, and
will retain the expertise, knowledge and resources necessary to deliver federally-funded transportation and transit projects, and has assigned, and will maintain a
single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation.projects to
coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management
Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrang, FHWA, and CTC on all communications,
inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and deliveryprocessforallFHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects
implemented by APPLICANT; and
4. PROJECT will be implemented as described in the complete application and in
this resolution, subject to environmental clearance, and, if approved, for the
amount approved by MTC and programmed in the federal TIP; and
5. APPLICANT has reviewed the PROJECT and has adequate staffing resources to
deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the
project application; and
6. PROJECT will comply with the requirements as set forth in MTC programming
i
guidelines and project selection procedures for the PROGRAM; and
7. In the case of a transit project, APPLICANT agrees to comply with the-
requirements of MTC's Transit Coordination Implementation Plan as set forth in
MTC Resolution No. 3866,revised; and
i
T-DPW-170203/24049 2 3
Council Agenda: 1-23-18
Item No.: 1.F
8. In the case of a highway project, APPLICANT agrees to comply with the
requirements of MTC's Traffic Operations System (TOS) Policy as set.forth in
MTC Resolution No. 4104; and
9. In the case of an RTIP project, PROJECT is included in a local congestion
management plan, or is consistent with the capital improvement program adopted
pursuant to MTC's funding agreement with the countywide transportation agency;
and
10. APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY
FUNDING funded projects; and
11. APPLICANT ' is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL
DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and
12. There is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds;
and
13. There is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect
the proposed PROJECT,or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT;
and
14. APPLICANT authorizes its City Manager, or designee to execute and file an
application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the
PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and
15. A copy of this resolution will be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the
filing of the application; and
16. The MTC is requested to support the application for the PROJECT described in
the resolution, and if approved, to include the PROJECT in MTC's federal TIP
upon submittal by the project sponsor for TIP programming.
T-DPW-170203/24049 2 4
Council Agenda: 1-23-18
Item No.: 11
Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on January 23, 2018, by thefollowingvote:
AYES: HENDRICKS, KLEIN, LARSSON, GRIFFITH, MELTON, SMITH, GOLDMANNOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
RECUSAL: NONE
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
a
4KATLEE RANCO
City Clerk
NS G` ENN HENDRICKS(
SEAL)
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROBERT L. BOCO
Sr. Assistant City Attorney
I
i
I
i
T-DPW-170203/24049_2 5
Council Agenda: 1-23-18
Item No.: IT
r
June 7, 2019
Sunnyvale
City Hall
456 West Olive Avenue
Sunnyvale,CA 94088-3707DavidStillman
TDD/TYY 408-730-7501
Transportation Manager sunnyvale.ca.gov
Public Works
408) 777-3249
Re: Cost—Sharing Agreement—City of Sunnyvale and City of Cupertino, VERBS Project at
Homestead High School
Enclosed is one fully executed contract for the above-stated agreement for your records. If you
have any questions or need additional information,please contact Carmen Talavera at Public
Works Department at 408-730-7522.
Sincerely,
1
i
Lynette Jaramillo
Principle Office Assistant
City of Sunnyvale
Heart of Silicon Valley""
Bike Plan Ped Plan Bike Plan Ped Plan Feasibility
Study Design Construction Changes in Scope Bike Plan Ped Plan
Feasibility/
Concept
Study
Design Construction Comments Prior Years Funding Proposed
FY19/20 Grants Donations Bicycle Pedestrian
Commission
City
Council
1
Tier 1 (Score 91)
Project Title: Class IV
Separated Bikeway
N/A
Conceptual
design
completed
65% Complete $171,555 $1,628,445 Phase 1 $1,800,000 $1.8M from Apple 10/18
15
Tier 1 (Score 55)
Project Title: Configure
Intersection - Wolfe
Rd/Stevens Creek Blvd
N/A Program Level estimate only
2 2
Tier 1 (Score 80) Project
Title: Class IV Separated
Bikeway
Tier 2 (Score 75)
Project Title: Sidewalk -
McClellan Road, north side,
Hwy 85 to Rose Blossom
Conceptual
design
completed
Complete
between Imperial
and Stelling.
In progress
between
Imperial and
Stelling
$286,000 $158,000 $426,182.00 2,122,574Phase 1A - Stelling to Imperial;$430,000
$1M VERBS, $55K local TFCA,
$85,822 regional TFCA,
$157,237 DIL for De
Anza/Pacifica Intersection
$2,000,000 from
Apple
7/17, 8/17, 10/17,11/17,
1/18, 10/18
5 N/A
Tier 1 (Score 70)
Project Title: Configure
Intersection - McClellan
Rd/Stelling Rd
N/A Complete Construction
Starts 6/17/19 $550,000 N/A $0 $1,581,920
Phase 1B - Intersection Imps Bubb
& Stelling; Design Costs included
in Phase 1A
8 N/A
Tier 1 (Score 68)
Project Title: Configure
Intersection - McClellan
Rd/Westacres/Kim St
N/A Complete In-Progress Project Limits and
scope under review $200,000 N/A $148,000 $1,475,000 Phase 2 - Stelling to Torre
14 8
Tier 2 (Score 56)
Project Title: Configure
Intersection - De Anza
Blvd/McClellan Rd
Tier 2 (Score 60)
Project Title: Reconfigure
intersection - De Anza Blvd at
McClellan Rd
Complete Not Started Project Limits and
scope under review $200,000 $9,707,000 $247,000 $1,814,100 Phase 3 - De Anza/Pacifica
Intersection;$160,000 from Apple
21 N/A
Tier 3 (Score 33)
Project Title: Class II Bike Lane
- Pacifica Dr, De Anza Blvd to
Torre Ave
N/A Complete Not Stareted Design depends on
ROW Acquisition $11,000 N/A $130,000 $888,000 Phase 4 - Byrne to Imperial
Bike Boulevards (General - see detail below)Neighborhoods #1 through #7 N/A N/A
Conceptual
design
completed
N/A $52,537 regional TFCA 6/17 Project update on
2/6/2018
6 N/A
Tier 1 (Score 70)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Portal Ave Bike Blvd (#5)
N/A $35,000 N/A $34,000.00
12 11
Tier 2 (Score 60)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Mary Ave to Portal Ave Bike
Blvd (#4)
Tier 3 (Score 45)
Project Title: Construct curb
extensions - Bandley Dr at
Mariani Ave
$75,000 $217,000 $68,000.00
17 N/A
Tier 2 (Score 52)
Project Title: Reconfigure
Wall/Fence - Greenleaf
Dr/Mariani Ave
N/A $25,000 N/A $34,000.00
21 9
Tier 3 (Score 28)
Project Title: Class III Bike
Route - Civic Center to
Creekside Park Bike Route (#2)
Tier 2 (Score 60)
Project Title: Reconfigure
intersection - Torre Ave at
Town Center Lane
$3,000 $271,000 $5,500.00 $68,365.00
12
Tier 2 (Score 60)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Mary Ave to Portal Ave Bike
Blvd (#4)
N/A $75,000 $68,000.00
18
Tier 2 (Score 52)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Civic Center to Jollyman Park
Bike Blvd (#1)
N/A $43,000 $5,500.00
Neighborhood #6 3
Tier 1 (Score 75)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Tri School East/West Bike
Blvd (#7)
Conceptual
design
completed
Design to be
revisited with input
from neighborhood
$33,000 N/A $23,575.00 $293,037.25
7
Tier 1 (Score 69)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- West Cupertino North/South
Bike Blvd (#9)
$32,000 $24,400.00 $303,292.00
13
Tier 2 (Score 59)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Tri-School North/South Bike
Blvd (#8)
$38,000 $4,400.00 $54,692.00
Bicycle Wayfinding Program N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Complete N/A N/A N/A $60,000 $65k proposed Design complete $60,000 $65,000 8/17, 9/17
$469,000.00
TDA Article 3 = $166,259
$10,000,000 (through
construction)
Sources of Funding
$70,000
Design to be
revisited with input
from neighborhood
N/A
$300,000 (Study
only)
Current Estimated Cost
N/A
Total Design Costs = $170,000
Budget
6/20/2017
6/20/2017
Public Hearing
Bids rejected on
5/7/19
$242,941
Constructino of a bicycle/pedestrian bridge across
Stevens Creek Blvd at Carmen Rd $100,000.00 3/6/2018
10
N/A
N/A
3/18, 1/19, 2/19, 3/19
3/18, 1/19, 2/19, 3/19
$2,113,000.00
Tier 2 (Score 52)
Project Title: Class III Bike Blvd
- Civic Center to Sterling
Barnhart Park Bike Blvd (#2)
None to-dateIn Progress Yes
$100,000 added at mid-year FY
2018/19
Cost estimate based on May 29,
2019 consultant estimate + 10%
construction contingency,
$100,000 in utility relocation and
$100,000 in "other improvements"
$1,876,000.00 $100,000
100% Complete
Conceptual
design
completed
$565,565.00
Cross Reference
Neighborhoods #1 and #5
Spot Improvements within Neighborhoods #3 and
#7
Neighborhood #2
Bike Boulevards - Phase 1
Bike Boulevards - Phase 1A
N/A
5
Bike Boulevards - Phase 3 N/A
Bike Boulevards - Phase 2
Carmen Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
N/A
Project Narrative
Construction of Class IV bike lanes along Stevens
Creek Blvd between Foothill Blvd and Tantau
Avenue. Includes traffic signal mofications
throughout
Construction of Class IV bike lanes along McClellan
Rd between Byrne Ave and Torre Ave. Includes
traffic signal mofications at Bubb Rd, Stelling Rd
and De Anza Blvd
Status of Project
Conceptual
design
completed
Bulb-outs to be
completed with pop-
ups until project
rebid
100% Complete;
bids rejected.
Conceptual
design
completed
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes - McClellan
Phase 1A - Stelling to Imperial;
Phase 1B - Intersection Imps Bubb & Stelling;
Phase 2 - Stelling to Torre
Phase 3 - De Anza/Pacifica Intersection;
Phase 4 - Byrne to Imperial
Priority Assigned in:
Class IV Separated Bike Lanes - SCB
Phase 1: Wolfe to Tantau
Phase 2: Wolfe to Hwy 85
Phase 3: Hwy 85 to Foothill
N/A
Tier 2 (Score 62)
Project Title: Grade Separated
Crossing Study
Tier 1 (Score 70)
Project Title: Grade
Separated Crossing
11
Project Name
Original Estimate at Concept
N/A $68,365.00
N/A
N/A
N/A $5,500.00
N/A
$4.120,000
Phase 2: $1,900,000
Phase 3: $2,000,000
$7,266,000
Bike Plan Ped Plan Bike Plan Ped Plan Feasibility
Study Design Construction Changes in Scope Bike Plan Ped Plan
Feasibility/
Concept
Study
Design Construction Comments Prior Years Funding Proposed
FY19/20 Grants Donations Bicycle Pedestrian
Commission
City
Council
Historic De Anza Trail Study
Construction of a bicycle-pedestrian shared-use
path along the UPRR right-of-way within
Cuupertino city limits
4 10
Tier 1 (Score 71)
Project Title: Class I Path -
Union Pacific Trail
Tier 2 (Score 60)
Project Title: Shared-use path
- UPRR trail
$1,678,000 $1,678,000 $250,000
Mary Avenue Buffered Bike Lane 16 N/A
Tier 2 (Score 55)
Project Title: Class II Buffered
Bike Lane - Mary Ave
N/A $100,000 N/A $6,837 $68,365 $165,000 from Apple
Homestead Road @ Homestead High School
Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Project
Roadway and traffic signal improvements along
the Homestead Road frontage of Homestead High
School. Project is being completed through a
VERBS grant administrered by the City of
Sunnyvale with cooperation from the City of
Cupertino
19 N/A
Tier 2 (Score 49)
Project Title: Trail Crossing -
Homestead Rd/Mary Ave
N/A $10,000 N/A
Project is being funded through a
VERBS grant administered by the
City of Sunnyvale. Cupertino to
contribute $126,500 from Walk
Audit CIP
$1,000,000 VERBS grant and
$126,500 from Sunnyvale
McClellan Road Sidewalk Installation Phase 2 N/A 1 N/A
Tier 1 (Score 80)
Project Title: Sidewalk -
McClellan Rd, San Leandro to
Orange
Complete Complete Substantial
Completion N/A $2,040,000 $343,000 891,710 Several properties opted out $2,035,000 $2,465,000 from
Apple
Orange Ave and Byrne Ave Sidewalk
Installation
Construction of sidewalks along Orange Avenue
between Granada and Alcazar N/A 3 N/A
Tier 1 (Score 75)
Project Title: Sidewalk -
Orange Ave, Granada to
Alcazar
Complete
65% Design
Complete,
awaiting ROW
Acquisition
Scheduled Start
Fall, 2020
Design changes
based on ROW
Acquisition
N/A $2,000,000 $57,062 255,234 2,350,000
Construction estimate based on
Byrne estimate + escalation
Design costs were shared with
Orange Save through 65%
includes $85,000 for each street
ROW svcs
Orange Ave and Byrne Ave Sidewalk
Installation
Construction of sidewalks along Byrne Ave
between McClellan and Granada N/A 4 N/A
Tier 1 (Score 70)
Project Title: Sidewalk - Byrne
Ave, McClellan to Granada
Complete 95% Design
Complete
Scheduled Start
Fall, 2019
Design changes
based on ROW
Acquisition
N/A $2,000,000 $57,062 244,080 2,200,000
Construction estimate based on
HMH estimate dated 5/19/19 +
10% for CM Services
Design costs were shared with
Orange Save through 65%
includes $85,000 for each street
ROW svcs
School Walk Audit Implementation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,767,094 $250,000 $1,221,863 from
Apple 8/17
Bubb Road Improvements N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,980,000 from
Apple
Linda Vista Trail N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $595,500 8/17
Sources of Funding Public Hearing
Project Name Project Narrative
Cross Reference Priority Assigned in:Status of Project Original Estimate at Concept Current Estimated Cost Budget
$1,275,438$3,888,000
No
Tier 2 (Score 48)
Project Title: Class I Path -
Regnart Creek Path
$380,000 design
and environmental
clearance
$2,000,000 3/18, 4/19Complete65% Design Plans $158,000.00$664,000 $2,100,000.00
$250,000.00
20
Tier 1 (Score 70)
Project Title: Shared-use path
- Regnart Creek Trail
7
$2,293,000
Tier 1 (Score 67)
Project Title: Class I Path - I-
280 Channel Bike Path
DIL Funding : Apple Campus 2
= $250,000, Hyatt House =
$66,000, Interest = $3,650,
TOTAL = $319,650
Complete $2,293,000 No
$250,000 for
feasibility study and
$1,800,000 for
design from Apple
6
Constsruction of a bicycle-pedestrian shared-use
path along the Junipero Serra Channel between
the Don Burnett Bicycle Pedestrian Footbridge
and Calabazas Creek, and along Calabazas Creek
between the Junipero Serra Channel and Vallco
Parkway
Regnart Creek Trail
Junipero Serra Trail
Construction of a bicycle-pedestrian shared-use
path along Regnart Creek between Pacifica Dr and
E. Estates Dr
9
Tier 1 (Score 70)
Project Title: Shared-use path
- Junipero Serra Trail
595,500
Feasibility Study
approved on
8/21/2018
Project Updates on 3/21/18
and 10/17/18.
Recommendation for
approval on 12/19/18.
Feasibility Study
approved on
2/5/19 and
corrected on
5/21/19
1
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SUPPLEMENTAL 1
Meeting: April 13, 2023
Agenda Item #2
Subject
Consider ratifying Accounts Payable for the periods ending February 10, 2023; February
17, 2023; February 24, 2023; and March 3, 2023.
Recommended Action
A. Adopt Resolution no. 23-XXX ratifying Accounts Payable for the Period ending
February 10, 2023;
B. Adopt Resolution no. 23-XXX ratifying Accounts Payable for the Period ending
February 17, 2023;
C. Adopt Resolution no. 23-XXX ratifying Accounts Payable for the Period ending
February 24, 2023; and
D. Adopt Resolution no. 23-XXX ratifying Accounts Payable for the Period ending
March 3, 2023
Background:
Staff’s responses to questions received from councilmembers are shown in italics.
Q1-Q6: Councilmember question (Chao)
Q1:
Shouldn’t the Homestead High School Bike/Ped improvements be charged to the
Transportation or Traffic Fund instead of the General Fund? If not, why?
Staff response: This question is unrelated to the agenda item. Budget-related questions will be
2
addressed when the City Manager’s proposed budget is considered by Council.
Q2: Does this large amount get counted in actuals spent for bike/ped enhancements?
Staff response: This question is unrelated to the agenda item. Budget-related questions will be
addressed when the City Manager’s proposed budget is considered by Council.
Q3:
Shouldn’t the Parks & Rec brochure come out of their Recreation Program Fund instead
of the General Fund? If not, why?
Staff response: This question is unrelated to the agenda item. Budget-related questions will be
addressed when the City Manager’s proposed budget is considered by Council.
Q4:
What does the description “General Fund HSG – Q2” mean?
Staff response: HSG is Cupertino’s Human Services Grant Program (HSG). Annually, the City of
Cupertino budgets $125,000 to issue grants to non-profit agencies providing needed services to
Cupertino residents. These grants are paid for from General Fund dollars.
Q5-Q7: Councilmember questions (Mohan)
Q5: What do we pay ABAG $10,158 for? (2/1/23)
Staff response: The City pays the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for natural gas.
ABAG POWER conducts pooled purchasing of natural gas on behalf of local governments and
special districts in the Bay Area who voluntarily join our program.
Q6: Maitri $5504 (2/21/23) -that's a social services agency, right?
Staff response: Maitri is a nonprofit organization based in the San Francisco Bay Area that
primarily helps families and individuals from South Asia (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan,
India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives) facing domestic violence, emotional abuse,
cultural alienation, or family conflict. Maitri provides case management services and housing
search assistance to adult residents of Cupertino.
Q7: 2/15/23, City paid City of San Jose $42,968 for animal services?
Staff response: The City pays the City of San Jose for animal control services. The City of San
Jose’s Animal Care and Services provides shelter and field services to residents of Cupertino, as
well as to residents of San Jose, Los Gatos, Milpitas, and Saratoga.
3
Attachments Provided with Original Staff Report:
A. Draft Resolution 2.10.23
B. Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 2.10.23
C. Draft Resolution 2.17.23
D. Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 2.17.23
E. Draft Resolution 2.24.23
F. Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 2.24.23
G. Draft Resolution 3.3.23
H. Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 3.3.23