89,301 Urritia Kurt 21812 Lomita Ave 89,301 Urritia, Kurt
21812 Lomita Avenue
CITY OF CUPERTINO �*
• RECEIPT 51-- •
• No. 55821 •
5J4to
l DATE 19
• RECEIVED KJ�-T UrrI41G
FROM I •
ADDRESS S I Z Lon, Ave
"SH CHECK MONEY
• /l ORDER DOLLARS CENTS •
• rirle�c�t'�"�on •
• t io - --)I - 5o •
• RECEIVED �V l •
BY
$µ51 CWWN&ISlff555Y51FMS.SNNNY .CA.VeLEG s
� 89, 301 •
RESOLUTION NO. 8174
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
DESIGM= "LOMITA AVENUE 90-07", APPROXIMA=Y 0.15 ACRE LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ILPMA AVENUE BETWEEN BYRNE
AVENUE AND ORANGE AVENUE; URRIIIA (APN 357-15-09)
WFERFAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the
City of Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.15 acre on
the south side of Tomita Avenue between Byrne Avenue and Orange Avenue
(APN 357-15-09) has been filed with the City of Cupertino; and
WMMAS, on June 18, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
8152 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Iamita
Avenue 90-07"; and
WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of lam included
in the proposal consent to this annexation; and
W EREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that
the Kcal Agency Formation Cotmnission shall not have any authority to
review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated
territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the
annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and
therefore the City council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting
authority for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory
the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino as follows:
1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the
Government Code for the annexation of property designated "Lcmta
Avenue 90-07," more particularly described in Exhibit "A";
-1-
RFSOIIA'ION NO. 8174
2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City
of Cupertino:
a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately
0.15 acre.
b. That the a*+*m ticn is consistent with the orderly annexation of
territory with the City's Urban service area and is consistent
with the City policy annexing when providing City services.
C. The City Council has ompleted an initial study and has found
that the annexation of said territory has no significant impact
on the envlrO mw t, and previously approved the granting of a
Negative Declaration.
d. The City Council on June 4, 1984, enacted an ordinance prezoning
the subject territory to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 zone.
e. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in
special districts.
f. That the territory is within the City urban service area as
adopted by the Local Agency Formation Camu_ssion.
g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions.
h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the
Proposed annexation to be definite and certain, and in coripliance
with the Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall
reimburse the County for actual costs incurred by the County
Surveyor in making this determination.
i. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or area in
which it world be difficult to provide municipal services.
j. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of
v4nership.
k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's
General Plan.
1. That the City has ccuplied with all conditions imposed by the
commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban
service area.
-2-
RESOI=CN NO. 8174
M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City
limits under provisions of the Goverment Code.
3. That said annexation is herby ordered without election pursuant to
Section 35151 et seq. of the Government Cade.
4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is
directed to give notice of said annexation as prescribed by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino this 16th day of July 1990, by the
following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Goldman, Koppel, Sorensen, Szabo, Rogers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/ Dorothy Cornelius /s/ Barbara A. Rogers
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
-3-
LOMITA AVENUE 90-7
(UIUZL=)
All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State
of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 80 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Map of Subdivision "A" Monta Vista" which map was filed for
record in the office of the Recorder of Santa Clara County on April 11,
1917 in Book "P" of Maps, Page 20;
Thence South, 90.82 feet to a point being along that certain annexation to
the City of Cupertino entitled "ALMADEN 80-13";
Thence West, 50.00 feet along said annexation "ALMADEN 80-13";
Thence North, 130.82 feet;
Thence Fast, 155.15 feet to a point being along that certain proposed
annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "ORANGE 90-211;
Thence South, 40.00 feet along proposed annexation 'ORANGE 90-2" to a
point being the northeast corner of Lot 79;
Thence West, 105.15 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing: 0.25 acres, more or less.
APN: 357-15-09
eq, 3ol
. • STEVENS CREEK BLVD
z
GRANADA Q o
4 Q W
NERMOSA O f
LOM TA
W LOMITA
z
m ALMADEN
SITE
FERNANDO
SPH
LOCATION MAP
SCALE 1"= 1000
APN 35'7•IS-09
± .25 acre5
EAST 165.1$�
LOM ITA AVE 8 Q
W
' m IU
Q = m P. .B. Q
O 4 0 r Ci
W T
Ll 50.aD'
4
"ORANGE 9 2"
42
F�m
"ALMADE 60-13"
ALMADEN AVE. OLIVE AVE
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE
CITY OF CUPERTINO
ENTITLED
"LOMITA 90-7
5/90 I"= 100,
(URRUTIA)
r A
1131
.t PENINSUTA HOME tMRIOVEMENIS F
Si .MN1Ny11PFNIXMIM_MErR 7.I,fl1f,N '`/ �Y��IY��/N
�1111"11 M41R1. (G M'l4]!l/lT"II — � I 19 1V 9?WIW KII
PAY
TOTHE
ORDER OF_ SJ. __. —_ —_-._ Y.. _— _ lC
_.�G.. D - LLARS
HOME SAVINGS
.:, S/
CUPERTINO OFFICE G45
ZOS]]STEVENS CREEK1L�VO.,CUPERTINO,CA apOA
1 FOR.��Lx
11100 1 L 3 Lila 1: 3 2 L 180 7801:004 590499 3811a
}-_vurm.-_s+memo•=_s-aw�..c._:_s _-_--_�.ffao..:_�..�-aa.-.r_>®rr_��crsaas,--_..rm�r:-_-r-..�saie.-_�.vm�.�u.-_.c_+�u..-__ -"®"_-cc�..a.,:_T
1130 '1
PENIN5U1A HOME IMPROVEKENn
I wvnws.vwooiia¢—rrr msnKK�nN it
90-8078/3211
PAY
eljTo THE
ORDER OF L, �A . $
DOLLARS )
a
HOME SAVINGS
,;... OF AME S J�
+_ CUPERTINO OFFICE OJS
� 1a5]]STEVENENS CREEK BLV\D..CUPERTINO,uMM4
'1 FOR (_$
.11'00 L L 3011@ 1: 3 2 11,807804004 590499 3811"
301
LCI-=A AVENUE 90-7
(UMWM)
All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State
of California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 80 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Map of Subdivision "A" Monta Vista" which map was filed for
record in the office of the Recorder of Santa Clara County on April 11,
1917 in Book "P" of Maps, Page 20;
Thence South, 90.82 feet to a point being along that certain annexation to
the City of Cupertino entitled "ALMADEN 80-13";
Thence West, 50.00 feet along said annexation "ALMADEN 80-13";
Thence North, 130.82 feet;
Thence East, 155.15 feet to a point being along that certain proposed
annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled 'ORANGE 90-211;
Thence South, 40.00 feet along proposed annexation "ORANGE 90-2" to a
Point being the northeast Corner of Lot 79;
Thence West, 105.15 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing: 0.25 acres, more or less.
APN: 357-15-09
8q, 3oi
• STEVENS CREEK BLVD
z
GkANADA � J
0 W
NO
HERMOSA 0.
LOM TA
w LOMITA
2
rm ALMADEN
SITE
FERNANDO
SPA
LOCATION MAP
SCALE I"= 1000
APN 35-7•15-09
± .25 acres
EAST i65.i5'
LOMIrA AVE 8Q
W
Q P. .B. Z
Q
o a o r p
2 N T N
h
SO.ro
4 "ORANGE 9
az �
Fero
"ALMADE 80-13"
ALMADEIV AVE. OLIVE AVE
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE
CITY OF CUPERTINO
ENTITLED
"LOMITA 90-7 "
5/90 1 loo'
(URRUTIA)
^anta Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission Ph . : (408 ) 299-4321
County Government Center - 10th Floor , East Wing
70 West Hedding Street
San Jose , CA 95110
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESIE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
.The....under,si.gned . hereby petition(s) the Local Agency Fo.rmat,ion Commission
of Santa Clara County for approval of a proposed change of organization or
reorganization, and stipulates ) as follows :
1 . This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3 , Division 3 , Title 5 of the
California Covernment Code (commencing with Section 56000. Cortese-Knox
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ) .
2 . The proposed change of organization or reorganization is designated as :
"LOMITA AVF.NUF. 90-7^
and consists of :
consolidation of special districts
formation of new special district
incorporation
X annexation to THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
detachment from (name City/District )
of .25 (number of ) acres on the S (n/s/e/w)
side of LOMITA (XkXOIk /Avenue )
between BYRNE (X'XtX XXk/Avenue )
and ORANGE (%XXiC XX /Avenue ) ;
and ( if applicable ) _ annexation
_ detachment
of the same to/from
(name City( ies ) /District ( s ) )
3 . A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the terri-
tory ( ies ) included in the proposal , marked Exhibit A. and a map of said
territory( ies ) , marked Exhibit R, are attached to this petition and by
this reference incorporated herein.
4 . The territory to be organized/reorganized is : inhabited .
( "inhabited " = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited .
5 . This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence of the
is not affected city and/or district ( s) .
6 . The reasons (s ) for the proposed ANNEXATION (annexation, detach-
ment , reorganization, etc . ) is/are :
TO PROCURE CITY SERVICES
7 . It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization
be made subject to the following terms and conditions :
N/A
8 . The person (s ) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one) :
X owner (s ) of land within the affected territory.
registered voter (s ) within the affected territory.
9 . The undersigned proponent (s ) X do own 100% of the territory pro-
do not posed for change of organiza-
tion or reorganization.
r::;r3
LAFCO: Petition -2-
10 . If the formation of new district (s)__.i-&- included in the proposal , the
principal act(s) under which s_ad-d--district s) is/are proposed to be
formed is/are:
11 . If nart- r corporation is included in proposal , provisions are re-
quested for appointment of �_
City Manager
City Cler City Treasurer
Wherefore , petitioner (s) requests ) that proceedings be taken in accordance
with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq . of the Government Code and
herewith affix signature(s) as follows :
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Signatures
\ of Petitioners
(Please print Assessor ' s Election
name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct
C / ``
Date
natur City/State/Zip �� No . * No. **
Cur{ 4 / r,f L'WHAA Cam_ 2: Lilq
Phohe : ( o` )
Phone : (_)
Phone : (_)
* - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner-
initiated proposals .
** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter
initiated proposals .
Rev. l/l/86
Santa Clara County LAFCO Ph . : ( 408 ) 299- 4321 - Secly
County Government Center - 10th F1 . , E . Wing ( 40B ) 299- 4716 - EXeC .
70 West Hedding Street , San Jose , CA 95110 OfLicer
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CIIAN(,'I OF OPCANIZATION OR l?),:011CANI 'ZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted , in
original and 5 copies , with any petition or resolution of application to
LAFCO for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorgani -
zation (multiple annexations and/or detachments ) made pursuant to the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code
Sec . 56000 et seq . )
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: "LOMITA 90-7"
Annexation )
R11Y)ft bt1DrXkt ) to/from CITY OF CUPERTINO
htScmXxlckaxmacBY�oxx) (City o r S p e c .District )
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
x CITY OF CUPERTINO as Lead Agency for environmental review
(Name of City/District )
of the project, has already PRE7.ONF.D
(prezoned? other approval action? )
the territory on JUNF. 4. 1984 and in compliance with CEQA, has :
(date)
determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from pro-
visions of CEQA pursuant to Cal .Adm. Code Sec .
(cite class exemption section) .
X completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the
annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is
attached to this application.
LAFCO is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the pro-
ject and the completed Environmental Information Form required by
LAFCO environmental assessment staff is attached to this applica-
tion . (Environmental staff phone : (408 ) 299-2521 . )
Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to
Cal . Adm. Code Sec , because
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE. AREA
1 . Number of acres .25'- ACRE
2 . Number of inhabitants 1
3 . Number of registered voters 0
4 . Number of dwelling units 1
5 . a . What is the present use of the area (be brief , but specific ) :
SFDNL
b . Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels , if any, which are
under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson
Act :
C . What steps , if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken
to release the above parcel ( s ) from the contract?
FILING DEADLINE: 5 : 00 p . m. on the first Wednesday of the month, for LAFCO
hearing on the second Wednesday of the following month .
G . a . For city annexations , what is the prezoning that has been applied
by the city to the affected area (Note : Prezoning is a LAFCO fil-
ing requirement for city annexations ) :
R1-7.5
b . Does the applicant intend to propose .a change in this zoning if
and when the territory is annexed to the city? YES NO X
If YES , indicate the new zoning which will be sought .
7 . For city or district annexations , describe the development being pro-
posed for the territory, if any, and when this development is ex-
pected to begin.
N/A
8 . Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of
assessment and ownership? YES x NO
If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide
justification for LAFCO' s approving the boundary change as proposed :
9 . Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island,
corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES NO x
If YES , answer the following questions :
a . Number of acres in the island , corridor
or strip? ( If more than one island is
being created , indicate the acreage of
each island . )
h . Number of inhabitants?
C . Assessed value?
d. Land use and zoning in island , corridor -
or strip?
e . Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island :
f . Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against
creation of an island? YES NO
If YES , explain why creation of an island is justified .
SERVICES
10 . Is the territory proposed for annexation/dPXxmkxDWxtg2DO EJ=XtaxX)dcap in
the City or Districts urban service area? YES x NO
11 . If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development
be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing
sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES NO x
If YES , what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
12 . Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc-
tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be financed
by the formation of a special assessment district? YES NO x
If YES, describe service (s ) or improvement (s ) and the average cost
per resident/landowner of the district .
Service/improvement :
Cost : $ /yr . for _ yrs . x_/Yr . for _ yrs .
13 . List all cities, special districts , ( including school districts ) and
County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal . (Ex-
elude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air
Pollution Control District, County Library Zone , and Water Importa-
tion. ) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information) :
CUPERTINO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT
FREMONT HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MID PENINSULA OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
FOOTHILL COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
For changes in organization of Districts , list all cities within 3
miles of the subject territory:
14 . For city annexations , list those concurrent or future detachments
from Special Districts which are proposed for this territory.
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
15 . Please provide the information requested below:
._ a.. Qwners, . of land* within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor-
ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent
by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses , with
date , below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated
by property-owner petition; put "see petition" below and type or
print in names , addresses , etc . ) Assessor ' s parcel number ,
assessed land (not improvements ) valuation, and , if 100e
property-owner consent has been obtained , certification by City/
District Clerk , must be added prior to filing . Hearing not re-
quired if 100% property owner consent is obtained .
Assessed
Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of
Date (Print name below) City/State/Zip Tel .No . No . Land
SEE PETITION 21812 LOMITA AVE. 357-15-009 .1f108j242
KURT URRUTIA CUPERTINO, CA
( If additional space required , continue list on separate sheet & attach . )
* "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last
Equalized Assessment - Roll : where such person is no longer the owner,
then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next
Assessment Roll ; where land is subject to a recorded written agree-
ment of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser , and any public
agency owning land . " Government Code Section 56048 .
CERTIFICATE OF CITY/DISTRICT CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal)
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located
within the annexation/&mVir BUMMz 8xxla=VBM*IM proposed by this applica-
tion and that the _ (number) signatures above represent all of the
owners of property included in this proposal . I FURTHER CERTIFY that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 56839 , the City/District waives the
requirement for written notice and gives consent for the Commission to
make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing.
Date:
City/P4C MPM9 Clerk
(Seal )
City/NI:6' IXIrt of
Suppl . Appl . -3
b. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor-
ganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed
by name , address , parcel number and assessed land valuation
below. Signatures and dates not required . Hearing will be held
for less-than-l00%-consent applications .
Assessed
Street Address Parcel Value of
Name City/State/zip No . Land
( If additional space required , continue list on separate sheet S attach . )
C . FOR NOT- 100%-CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters resid-
ing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorgani-
zation if different from the landowners shown in 15a . and 15b .
above .
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/'l.ip Name City/State/7.iP
( If additional space required , continue list on separate sheet and attach)
16 . Print or type the name and address of officers or persons , not to
exceed three in number , who are to receive copies of the Executive
Officer ' s Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the
Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district):
Street Address
Name City/State/Zip
( 1 )
(2 )
( 3 )
17 . I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and
that the statements made in this application are to the best of my
knowledge accurate .
TRAM E WHITTEN 10300 TORRE AVENUE
(Print name of person complet- CUPERTINO CA 95014
ing this application) (Address )
0
(Signature) (Date)
NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this appli-
cation be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of this
document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential development of
five acres or more . It is the applicant ' s responsibility to submit this
information to the appropriate school district (s) and the signature above
is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met .
Suppl . Appl'. - 4
tru. warrawwdee�w crra34
w+•• oYiY�
owe saesss tsateo, malt sea ateseteatwa ao
IQT Ufn.IT1)6
�%XW*1 .�
1821 LomitatiwtO�M I
peirtino, CA 95014 MAY 2 1 M5
ALM
RKMONN0.<-91713-L1! �tlMlrb Kaai, Oil
OItDEKNO• 85018C8
onli5r. boo i
RFu t'RWERTY TRALCIM TAX SURVEY MONLaaTtY FRERavvAllm
S 124.30 aj FtttlVail, EgWty FwW Fee$ �WA
CITY CONVF YANCE TAX
EWA A.P.N.357-15-,Inn
S [
rant
J350 90
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged
JOFR! JOSEPN F:f::Ai:! i.;C I Af •n4ET i:i EL EtY:i�:,
1
hereby GRANT(s) to QFCO
KURT URRUT 1 A, A S I NCLE 'AN oR t aQ T q w���'a
, 8f
� R b go ,ro 0
�Z PhOToc
die r t �CORo
U�tol.owing uc5:.:ib:.d real pro `.:.y it. the CITY O�` CUPERTINO
1 Coanty of SiVITA CLA.;A State of CA
h THE EASTERLY 50 FECT, FRONT AND FEAR I.,EASUREMENTS OF SECTION (50, AS S CY-:N
Ok THE NAP EHTITLCO, tt!2AP OF SUcCIVISIO"! "All tZHTA VISTA", tlIfICI1 I'AP t:AS FILED
Ftn RECORD IC TF!E OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUtITY OF SId!T,-. (1f.RF, STATE
OF CAL I FOR.".I P., ON APR IL 1 1 , 1917 it! BOOR: P OF I•APS, PACE -10.
d
z
In
tz
a
Dated I-W 17, 1985 *J�OHO-.� ARI)fr*
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Jo
COUNTY OF San_ta Clara
on May 17, 1985 before mel
the ttndersteeed,a Notuy Public in and fa still County and Suta) ItAFG ET HAZEL •REI IH&N
personally appeared
John Joseph Hazard and ��
Margaret Hazel Brennan �ite-16u. 1vgny
proved to me on the buts of uthrwtory evidence to be the pemo(s) �� A•' YVALE ROAD
whor tume(s) Wan wbsttdmd to the within instrument, and .. A 95070
acknowiedaed to me that he/she they executed the�anw. .. VM
WITNESS my han pnd offkW sca '.
OFFICIAL srx
tAUREN L. WILLIS
NJ'rwrtti at�Ht.K.CrltsOs+t';tA � .
SAN I A rLAPA Q-"M
My ccnwn:9si0n.,.iM'M.JG"t,ahft l9(1 1�t♦ title
twta�l•slita�0ii>tor
ineurenou coo I*Muw
11ty Commiaelon will expire 1/6/89
*AJL TAX STATEMENT TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOLLOWI1 LINE; IF NO PARTY IS SHOWN, MAIL AS DIRECTED ADOVE.
\t y�
Name
' F
r
•�.+' ram, T
• • '� �� , � i i d ti',�!it 1� � l I`"^1`"! Tiny °4); °� �I � ad d' "NN_
' � 1� �J r !! ^� I (li'd � r 111�{ L x r Il�+�\•�,y� I�� �
r
0Q,I ril P .
� h J 1 • �. 4! �I 1 !I' 1 Y'('I I A � I t
a�• <' t tl"11 .�'K 'p�6d. 1 `Y�e '14� 'r why for a� I ,I�R
p� yy�'' J - '��,1 `AY �h ! r I w 'T ' A' •C li I
A3' VAPA�' !f ( I • ri TllF�ltiif?a'�I}[���'1�IA 4 f ;�� err �'
r7 ' +1 ►N , 1 1• I ' I YY 14r "'4.)I u i+lt� »
\ � Y_ 1. P,;.^ � i ;�•s� Fr It l� +lr
1 1
V. A .q..
�` y ' ! A[IQNZO $12ARD add AfifA NAP.ARD hSe ,w1le. ' AS)0 a 4
, '+ '�• ;�'. , . 71r fawn' -dumlwl Red Mai to a'Iw 8uw of CFwley
'The ,Baatirly 'Wfeet. front and',rear mean u1'lllaants, of Sect o
800 ac ahown on the Map +entitled, "Nap of Nub vq, 'Son 1AI -Monte
VIT i ' Wlcb Map,wae filed for racord in 4 I �}5e of the Nefio Q
of; tha,County of 4anta Clare, state oC fal4 hR jloq;."April 1" 1 .'
I in eoo Maps, page
�C P of Mae .20. "
g
T
e .a
i
•'` I 4tlY h
.o I
y �
�r
t try '.' e!�` �•!r y� i
1'OR a040NUHN'} hbt RATE 01 CAI.IIKINNII `•� �"to I V ul
r 80GY�r .A to �lu�q ti '4,4 x A»i
' �2.) fbP(11fJ la, Jur1M. 7 , li+a4F� 1 w 1,`$*
►John 4 , •lirpoka . "•`;..Mu � .'
FWD�FORI RECORD
. InlanNly wrr.n,i I A v VAVI7
�
P ! G►►101'.. ll a
OORD v •1 'Pr lu bl a r 44wh yY I f�A" i y I'� ��� wlya rumrnr,.nd ualwNrd�rd lAN
atcoeote � WITNESS rn,'hand.rr
iAi Ir
'' iPI ftgCArwG ;1„1 �11'.s j¢t'
�7f
t
a _
CiLy of Copl,rlinn
NI:CA'I'IVIS DECLARATI41N•
May 21 . 1'1ti/I
As providl,d by for Rnvironax•nlal Ansl,ss:nx•ot INouudnrr, adoplyd by the (:Ilv
CollocI I of Ihr City of Coped iou oa Rat -It ?1, 1971, nr, anu•ndcd , the lol lowing;
dl,srribed prujert was )muted n NogtnlIve Declrlration by till, Clly Council of
Ibl, City of Cupertino on May 71 , 198/I.
I'rn.je .lIh_so.ripl inn :old Local._.iou
Appl irnl inn 4-1-A-8h Appl ir:mt City of Coprrl gnu (Old Munk; Vis;la area)
Lovat ion: Ceoer:,I I h000dod by Granada Avrnul, to till,
north, Imperial Avcnov to the rasa .
MrClollan Road I Ihl, ::uolh and by the
weslel ly ho,nul:Ory of till, Itlackbl,rry
R:O-nI Go I t Coo rst• to Hob wos;t .
Uhl,-rel i_uo_nry Ar_I. loo IL•q or:a : I'roruno :Ind lvznnr
approxi.maloly 97 nrres: within the 01d Munt;I VI!;t;t
area to ItI-M (Itesid(vltlaI SinFle-I'nnlI10 . RI -7.5
(Resldi•nl L;II Sing;le-f:unllv) . V (I'iannl,d DeveIopnxvtl
wiLh a Ites ideal i:II /I ./1-12 dwl,l I Ing; oohs psi' g;ross
au re) , 11 (1'Iannl,d 1)4•vr•I411111x•nl with a Its;:Well l i:II
4 .4-7.7 dwelling; nails pl,r gross: ars(.) , P (VIaunrd
Ih•Veiopnn•ol with 1.1ltbl Indoslrinl and Rrsidunli:II ) ,
P (I•I;ootod Ih•ve lopuxml with AI(r l,-it I I orv/Rre rval tonal ) ,
nod 111) (I'III.I l, till glding;) zollIIII% dlslr1rlr. .
hiilding;s ul Del. isionnt:IkinF; Body
•Ihr• gill' Cnnnuil gran Led ;I Ni-gal ive Ih•r larnl ino sines till, pro jrrl is; ronvi^I onl
with the Gl,neral flan and has: no s: ig:nll imam onvirnnmrnlal Imparts.
,Innu•s II . Sisk
I'lann [Ill'. Dirot Ior
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed
in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on May
22, 1984.
f
eputy City Clerk
�:Rq13d/
Initial Study
City of Cupertino
Environmental Assessment Procedures
E. A. File Number(s) 4-EA-84
Application File Number(s) 1-Z-84
Date February 27, 1984
The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, requires public
agencies to evaluate public and private projects to determine their potential
impact on the environment.
This worksheet is intended to provide guidance for both you, the applicant, and
City officials in assessing a proposed project to determine whether it may or
may not have a significant impact on the environment.
If, based upon the information provided below, the City makes a determination that
your project may have a significant impact on the environment, you will be required
to prepare an Environmental Impact Report as provided by State law and the City
of Cupertino 's Environmental Assessment requirements.
Detailed information regarding the environmental assessment procedure is avail-
able from the Director of Planning and Development.
Part I
Information to be completed by the Applicant
Project Type (Pre)Zoningl dl Tentative Map Other
Use Permit Variance
0 c onta Vista Area generaliy bounded by rana a ven7C ue to the'nor T "Imperial
Location Avenue to the east, McClellan Road to the st th and by the westerly boundary of
the Blackberry -arm o . ourse to Me W.I.
Applicant City of Cupertino
Address of Applicant 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone (408) 252-4505
General Deicription of Project Prezone and rezone the above areas to zoning
districts consistent with the General Plan. The proierr site contains approximately
_97 acres.
Rev.7/8/80
. -1-
Description of Project (cont 'd. )
Specific Details of the Project
1. Size of Site N/A
2. Intensity of Development
(a) If residential:
(1) Number of units per gross acre
(2) Residential Unit Schedule :
grwj
ated Total rice (NumberUnit type Y1
Unit type G2
Unit type d3
Unit type 94
Unit type 05
(3) Percentage in area of building coverage
Percentage in area of recreational open space
(4) Parking required Parking proposed
(b) If commercial, industrial, or institutional:
(1) Building square footage
(2) Percentage of building coverage of site
(3) Estimate of maximum number of employees per shift
(4) Parking required Parking proposed
-2-
Questions Related to Potential Impact of Project
A. Social/Cultural Impacts :
Yes ltavbe No
(1) Will the proposed project result in the dis—
placement of people?
X
(2) Will the project alter the employment base
of the community?
X
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the community?
X
(4) Does the proposed project affect a historical
or archaelogical site?
X (Note 1)
S. Physical Impacts : (Pac;e 4)
(1) Will the project result in a change of a natural
body of water, vegetative cover, or land form? X
(2) Will the project result in a change in a scenic
view or vista from existing residencial area
or public lands or roads? X
(3) Will the project change the development pattern,
scale or character of general area of project? X
(4) Will the construction and/or operation of the
project result in significant amount of solid
waste, litter, dust, ash, smoke, fumes or
odors in the vicinity? X
(5) Will the project result in a change in stream
or ground water quality or quantity or altera—
tion of existing drainage patterns? X
(6) Will the project substantially change existing
noise or vibration levels in the vicinity?
X
(7) Is the project site on filled land or on
slope of 10% or greater? X
(8) Does the project involve the use or disposal
of potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammable or explosive? X
(9) Is the project a phase of an existing or
future larger project or series of projects? X
—3—
Description of the Environmental Settin
Provide the following information on a separate attachment:
(1) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural , historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
structures. A plot plan may be required for the description.
(2) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commer-
cial, etc. ) , intensity of land use (one-family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc.) , and scale of devel-
opment (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc. ) .
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information pre-
sented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date{ 2 !f>4
(Signature)
For li t7�/
(1 ) The project site is comprised of existing urban development including a
acre golf course and picnic Ground recreation complex. The entire area
has general historic value. A few structures may have greater historical
value as separate entities. The recreation complex is located in the
100-year event flood plan for Stevens Creek.
(2) The project area is bordered by the Old N.onta Vista Commercial District
to the north, by the West Valley Industrial Park to the east and by
single-family residential neighborhoods to the south and west .
-4-
Part I I
Information to be completed by City Officials
A. Primary General Plan Considerations :
Yes Havbe No
(1) Is the project in violation of the City of
Cupertino's adopted General Plan?
(2) Will the project burden public utilities and
services?
(a) Fire and police services x
(b) Parks and recreation system x
(c) Schools
x
(d) Water system x
(e) Sever system x
(f) Storm system x
(g) Solid waste x
(3) Is the project side outside of the Urban Ser-
vice Area of the City as defined by Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission? x
B. Social/Cultural Impacts:
(1) Will the proposed project result in the dis-
placement of people? x
(2) Will the project alter the employment base
of the community? x
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the community? x
(4) Does the proposed project affect a histori-
cal or archaelogical site? x
(5) Will the proposed project eliminate an
existing recreational use at the project site? x
(6) Does the proposed project decrease public
access to any public body of water or recrea-
tional area? x
(7) Will the proposed project alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the
human population of an area? x
-5-
1 (8) Will the project result in:
Yes Mavbe No
(a) The disturbance of a natural or man-made
feature in the project area which is unique? X
(b) The obstruction of a .scenic vista open to
the public?
?C
C. Physical Impacts :
(1) Will the proposed project result in the exposure
of people or property to geologic hazards such
as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
failure or similar hazards? X
(2) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or physical
feature?
X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soil, either on or off the site? X
(3) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
(4) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff? X
(b) Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? X
(c) Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
-6-
4 Yes Mavbe No
(d) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground water? X
(e) Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either chrough direct additions or with-
drawals , or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavation? X
(f) Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public water
supplies?
X
(g) Exposure of people or property to water-
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
wave. X
(5) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs , grass, crops, and aquatic plants? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? X
(c) Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? X
(e) Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benchic organisms or insects)? X
(f) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
(g) Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? X
(h) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
(6) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Increase in existing noise levels? X
(b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
(7) Does the proposed project significantly affect
the potential use extraction or conservation of
a scarce natural resource such as agricultural
land, a mineral deposit, or woodland? X
-7-
Yes Mavbe No
(8) Will the proposed project involve the use,
storage, or disposal of hazardous materials?
(9) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy? X
(b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
(10) Will the proposed prp_e�t result in:
(a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
(11) Mandatory Findings of Significance:
(a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? X
(b) Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (a short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time, while long-term impacts will
endure into the future.) X
-8-
Yes Mavbe No
(c) Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? (A project may impact on two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts
on the environment is significant. ) X
(d) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? X
Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
(Note: Use additional sheets if necessary. )
Determination:
On the basis of this initial evaluation, the Environmental Review Committee finds :
,_I That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and therefore recommends the GRANTING OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
n That, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
of the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. It is recommended that A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BE PREPARED.
77 That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date
2941'fan, Environmental Review Committee
For L �—
-9-