89,305 San Fernando Ct 91-2 -89,305 SAN FERNANDO Cr. 91-2 -
J 1
1 1
1 1
r 1
..
ma's
10
RESOLJJPICN NO. 8547
A RESOIITTICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
MAICaC DEiERMI=CNS AND APPROVING THE AN E}ATICN OF 'TERRITORY
DESIGNATED "SAN FERNANIDO COURT 91-2", APPurxxrr =Y .16 ACRE LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN EERNANDO COURT BERWEEEN SAN F UiNDO
AVENUE AND MOCLEUM ROAD; MATTOCK (APN 357-12-014)
WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the
City of Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of .16 acre on
the south side of San Fernando Court between San Fernando Avenue and
McClellan Road (APN 357-12-014) has been filed with the Terence and Renee
Mattoon; and
WHEREAS, on October 21, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
8514 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "San
Fernando Court A1-2"; and
WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included
in the proposal consent to this annexation; and
WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Coverrmient Code states that
the Tocal Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to
review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated
territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the
annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and
therefore the City council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting
authority for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory
the City Council nay approve or disapprove the annexation without public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino as follows:
1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the
Government Code for the annexation of property designated "San
Fernando Court 91-2," more particularly described in Exhibit "A";
-1-
RESOL=CN NO. 8547
2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City
of Cupertino:
a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises appradmately
.16 acre.
b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of
territory with the City's urban service area and is consistent
with the City policy annexing when providing City services.
C. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found
that the annexation of said territory has no significant impact
on the environment, and previously approved the granting of a
Negative Declaration.
d. The City Council on June 4, 1984, enacted an ordinance prezoning
the subject territory to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 zone.
e. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in
special districts.
f. That the territory is within the City urban Service area as
adopted by the Local Agency Fbrmation Commission.
g. That the annexation is made subject to no terns and conditions.
h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the
proposed annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance
with the Camussion's road annexation policies. The City shall
reinburse the County for actual costs incurred by the County
Surveyor in making this determination.
i. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in
which it would be difficult to provide municipal services.
j. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of
ownership.
k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's
General Plan.
1. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the
commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban
service area.
-2-
RESCLUITON NO. 8547
M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City
limits under provisions of the Goverrmient Code.
3. That said annexation is herby ordered without election pursuant to
Section 35151 et seq. of the Government Code.
4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is
directed to give notice of said annexation as prescribed by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino this 18th day of November , 1991, by the
following vote:
Vote Mffrbers`of the City Council
AYES: Dean, Goldman, Koppel, Szabo, Sorensen
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ARREST: APPROVED:
/s/ Dorothy Cornelius /s/ Lauralee Sorensen
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
-3-
"EX[ IT An
Annexation to the City of Cupertino
Entitled San Fernando Ct. 91-2
Date: July 1991
All that real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 44 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Tract No. 211, Stevens Creek Subdivision, Map No. 4", Which map
was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa
Clara, State of California, on April 6, 1942 in Volume 7 of Maps, at Page
31, said point also being along that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Blackberry 91-0" by Resolution 8380:
Thence N 4503VW, 66.15 feet along said annexation "Blackberry 91-0" to
the southwest corner of Iot 44;
Thence N 290211E, 121.92 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 44 said
point also being along the southerly right-of-way line of San Fernando
Court;
Thence along said southerly right-of-way line of San Fernando Court
through a curve to the southeast with a radius of 177.31 feet, a central
angle of 160281, and an arc length of 50.95' to the northeast corner of
Lot 44;
Thence S 230431W, 135.44 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing: 0.16 Acres, more or less
6,750 Square Feet, more or less.
APN: 357-12-014
By: K.R.
REVISED: 10-3-91
STEVENS CRK BLVD_
%4cCLELLAN
GRANADA
HERMOSA
N N ITA
ALMADEN
SAN
SCALE: 1"=60' FERNANDO
ALCAZAR
DOLORES
48
��,o• y,� LOCATION MAP
\ 47 S� A= 16'28'
\ R = 177.31'
L = 50.95'
46
FRN
45 q/vDo CT.
b
.ti �ry O
LOT 44 2 ;� v 42
7,211 sq. f t.
0.16 acres
43
ANNEXATION
BLACKBERRY 91-0
(RES. 8380) 41
\ P.O.B.
BOUNDARY LINE OF EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
= EXISTING CITY ANNEXATION ENTITLED SAN FERNANDO CT. 91-2
BOUNDARIES
DATE: DULY 1991 SCALE: 1' - 60'
BY: RIEDEN,K. REVISED: 10-3-91
i 0
Giuliani & Kull, Inc.
Engineers / Planners / Surveyors
November 11, 1991
City of Cupertino PUBLIC
Public Works Dept. WORK$
Attn: Carmen NOV
10300 Torre Avenue j 1991
Cupertino, CA 95014
Subject: 22044 San Fernando Court
Dear Carmen:
With reference to our telephone conversation of Monday, November
4 regarding the quit claim of underground water rights to the
City of Cupertino as a part of the building permit process for
the subject property I provide the following legal description of
said property:
All of Lot 44 as said Lot is shown on the map of Tract
211, Stevens Creek Subdivision, Map No. 4, recorded April
6, 1942 in Volume 7 of Maps at Page 31, Santa Clara County
Records.
Please prepare the necessary documents for the owners signature.
Sincerely,
GIULIANI & KULL, INC.
Susan J. Roberts
cc: Bruce Donoghue
Hope Nicholson
20431 Stevens Creek Blvd. • Suite 230 • Cupertino, CA 95014 • (408) 257 - 6446
3y 53D
" rye'-' Cites of Cuperti»o
City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Colilornio 95014 (408) 252.4505
TRAN-EZUTrAL NEMORANDUM DATE: No L . mil
To: (�5�' ��1r �/ ) PRaTECr: ZZOg-� Sam
2<-=3--32 1 )�t1, 1-���_ > l�r. .-I
ernakl:io Cyr
(-! (" /4-
ATTENTION: FILE NO:
We are enclosing the following:
4�U r
hts
Comments:
bo ) r5�ct �i-Al l re?S el ��PGISC�
r z 4arr) -f o h a olfa; PS me- Dr
KQV�/7 1:1 ?GTP��.
CITY OF CUPERTINO
-ne.17 lfict
no
Oyu ���—
I I A1;GA FL,E 411
oK� 450921 FEB -87C 2463 ,zG wr J,�(, _
Loan No. � 92 63
AEC FEE
Recorded at the relluesl of
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: MICRO First American Title Guaranty Co.
LIEN tN' FEB 7 1983 No
Temnc R. ldat ui -- A.M.
I�Itee A. Aaiuilano $MRF
22044 San Femartdo Ct. Gentle A.Mann,Recorder
Cupertino, CA 95014 AnhganCanry,Official Records
SPACE ABOVE This LINE FOR RECOROER'f YfE
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: CITY TRANSFER TAX S —n—
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S 167.20
SURVEY MONUMENT PRESERVATION FUNO$ -0-
a-satro as abovCaa .._..Conpuln en In....itlerelbn west@ or popery earweved:OR
._-ConlpuleC on on conseer.tlon a aa4,.sum Rea or enwmpmca
rernsfinsy.r lene or W e.
never..1 omi enr w Aeon,derAw,man,u.-Ps.Narn.
FIRST Al, Y CAN TITLE CI UthNN COFIPANY
A. P.e 357-12-014
INSURED GRANT DEED
"4. FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby mclnw,ledeed,
lY FRANK J. TYRFnL and BAR9AFFa A. TYRFEM, husband and wife
hereby GRANTtSI to
n
41 W.RE4 " R. JfA'1TOON,m uneurried man, and RMM A. ACQUILANO, an urunarried tvnent, as
let joint tenants
the real property in the City of CUperuw;
County of Santa Clara State or California, desornaed a
Lot 44, "Tract 211 Stevens Cre k Subdivisim Map No. 4', Map filed in the County of
Santa Clara, m April 6, 1942 in Book 7 of Maps, Page 31
Dated
February 1, 1983
Frank J rr
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I
COUNTY OF Ia I //
c�nra rt;,ra j �2 `Zki,fn rt. i, yii L(
Barbara A. Tyrrell
On rnhn,a i t, tORT
belon me, In. ..din,pnW. . Nolery PBMk in and Iw ;Ad
151Ml9f17"NT'MIT aild Barbara A. 'llyrmrr-
proved to Ina on the UTsis of satisfactory evidence c, OFFICIAL SEAL
�117 MARIIYN RAYE
known to me to be Me persons wbae n�„a are / -Li NOIA.FpL Vi ' -LIFORNIA
wb.cunetl to the within innmmem eM eanoMetlped that --n a n. LLaRa rU
the nemetl m..Bn.. -' MY Eanm. Opne:AUG 2 Id, ISa]
WIT SS y M1y nen(tl �enG ILei-e1'./ul �j/'//7 ,
Si,n.,.,. /—e�Zgi, Y`� /" 1/ ITnlr — for stllebl ne,Alh wll
Marilyn kTye FORM 04280 42179f
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
��/ '>d5
"EX IT All
Annexation to the City of Cupertino
Entitled San Fernando Ct. 91-2
Date: July 1991
All that real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 44 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Tract No. 211, Stevens Creek Subdivision, Map No. 411, which map
was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa
Clara, State of California, on April 6, 1942 in Volume 7 of Maps, at Page
31, said point also being along that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Blackberry 91-0" by Resolution 8380:
Thence N 450331W, 66.15 feet along said annexation "Blackberry 91-0" to
the southwest corner of Lot 44;
Thence N 290211E, 121.92 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 44 said
point also being along the southerly right-of-way line of San Fernando
Court;
Thence along said southerly right-of-way line of San Fernando Court
through a curve to the southeast with a radius of 177.31 feet, a central
angle of 16028; and an arc length of 50.95' to the northeast corner of
Lot 44;
Thence S 230431W, 135.44 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing: 0.16 Acres, more or less
6,750 Square Feet, more or less.
APN: 357-12-014
By: K.R.
REVISED: 10-3-91
Ak
IRV STEVENS CRK BLVD
1 m— GRANADA
o V
w HERMOSA
wn
LOMITA
z
ALMADEN
SAN
SCALE: 1"=60' FERNANDO
ALCAZAR
Cr z
m
DOLORES
SITE
\ 48 �1, cCLELLAN
LOCATION MAP
47 s9
A= 16'28'
\ R - 177.31'
L = 50.95'
46
F �
FRN
45 UNDO CT.
a
ti o� o
ti� N1 N
LOT 44 42
7,211 sq. f t.0,
0,16 ncres .."�
ANNEXATION
BLACKBERRY 91-0
(RES. 8380) �s' 41
\ P.O.B.
= BOUNDARY LINE OF EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
= EXISTING CITY ANNEXATION ENTITLED SAN FERNANDO CT. 91-2
BOUNDARIES
DATE: JULY 1991 SCALE: 1" = 60'
BY: RIEDEN,K. REVISED: 10-3-91
Countyof Santa Clara • c�UNT�_
Department of Planning and Development
Office of the County Surveyor
county Government Center, East wing
70 west Hedding street
San.lose. California 951 10 Gy,P`
(408)299-2871
September 25, 1991
Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk
City of Cupertino
P.O.Box 580
Cupertino, CA 95015
The proposed annexation entitled SAN FERNANDO COURT 91-2 is not in accordance with
Government Code Section 56826.
X The boundaries are not definite and certain in the following respects but may not be limited
to):
(SEE KEY COPY ATTACHED)
1. EXHIBIT A AND EXHBIT B references to 'Blackberry Farm 91-0"
annexation should just say 'Blackberry 91-0" (leave out the word "Farm").
2. This is not a curve to the right; prefer you use "curve to the southeast' or 'left.
3. Hyphenate "right-of-way."
4. Why are bearings and distances different from those shown on the map you
reference, Volume 7 of Maps, Page 31?
1 am returning one copy of the map and description. Please show the revision date on any
subsequent map and description and return three (3) copies of each to me when you resubmit this
annexation request.
If you have any questions, please call Ginny Millar at (408) 299-2871.
Very truly yours,
JAMES F.SIRR
Manager / County Surveyor
VaZt;j 40,
Martin D. Marcott
Deputy County Surveyor
Enclosures
Board of Supervisors:Michael M. Honda.Zoe Lotgren, Ron Gonzales, Rod Diridon,Dianne McKenna
counry Executive:Sally R. Reed
r? 3os'
111 I TT All
Annexation to the City of Cupertino
Entitled San Fernando Ct. 91-2
Date: July 1991
All that real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Ict 44 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Tract No. 211, Stevens Creels Subdivision, Map No. 4", which map
was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa
Clara, State of California, on April 6, 1942 in Volume 7 of Maps, at Page
31, said point also being along that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Blackberry 91-0" by Resolution 8380:
Thence N 450331W, 66.15 feet along said annexation "Blackberry #*%
91-0" to the southwest corner of Lot 44;
lat .12
Thence N 290211E, tM093 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 44 said
point also being along the southerly right—of-way line of San Fernando
Court; ,,j4easf
Thence along said erly right-of-way line of San Fernando Court
through a curve to the with a radius
of 177.31 feet, a central angle of 100271 , and an arc length of
2", to the northeast corner of Lot 44; 16026'
5�.`15 f35.9¢
Thence S 230431W, n35'la feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing: 0.16 Acres, more or less
6,750 Square Feet, more or less.
APN: 357-12-014
By: K.R.
2evised : 10 -3-q
' S
STEVENS CRK BLVD
m GRANADA
4
w HERMOSA
� LOMITA
z
ALMADEN
SAN
SCALE: 1"=60' FERNANDO
ALCAZAR
CT z
m
DOLORES
SITE
\ 48 a cCLELLAN
Ile
LOCATION MAP
\ 47 S9 p = 16'27'30"
\ R = 177.31'
L = 50.93'
46
45 ,y�� F�RNgNpO
CT.
O�P� NryN ry
LOT 44 ^ ^�� 42
711IV VL
0. acres
/^y
0,16 ncres �`O
�G /e 43
ANNEXATION
BLACKBERRY FARM 91-0 66 �J•
(RES. 8380) �S' 41
P.O.B.
= BOUNDARY LINE OF EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
= EXISTING CITY ANNEXATION ENTITLED SAN FERNANDO CT. 91-2
BOUNDARIES
DATE: ,AIIY 1991 SCALE: 1' = 60'
BY: RIEDEN.K.
•
{L e�Y "I=IT All
Annexation to the City of Cupertino
Entitled San Fernando Ct. 91-2
Date: July 1991
All that real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 44 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Tract No. 211, Stevens Greek Subdivision, Map No. 411, which map
was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa
Clara, State of California, on April 6, 1942 in Volume 7 of Maps, at Page
31, said point also being along that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Blackberry 1�l-0" by Resolution 8380:
QI
Thence N 45o331W, 66.15 feet along said annexation "Blackberry QarD
91-0" to the southwest corner of Lot 44;
4'
Thence N 290211E, 1. feet to the northwest corner of Lot 44 said
point also being along e southerly fight of-way line of San Fernando
Court; Z 3
Thence along said erly right of wa line of San Fernando Court
through a curve to the ri wi a radial ing S42 30'43"W a radius
of 177.31 ee , a cen angle of 16 271301 , and-anarcN length of
0.9q-3' to the northeast corner of Lot 44; y� h
CJ v
Thence S 23o43'W, 135.4 feet to the Point of Beginning.
4
Containing: 0.16 Acres, more or less
6,750 Square Feet, more or less.
APN: 357-12-014
By: K.R.
" I
. � STEVENS CRK BLVD
CRANADA
G w HERMOSA
N � LOMITA
z
z ALMADEN
SAN
SCALE: 1"=60' FERNANDO
ALCAZAR
CT z
m
DOLORES
SITE
\
48 ccLELLaN
,L.��
��,o•.y�l LOCATION MAP
\ 47 is, = 16'27'30"
L = 50.93
46
45 ky�° RNANDO CT.
05O\p
LET 44 2 �� ,� 4 42
7,211 sq. f t. ^� a
0.16 acres
L /�r 43
ANNEXATIO I
BLACKBERRY AR 91-0
41
\ P.O.B.
= BOUNDARY LINE OF EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
= EXISTING CITY ANNEXATION ENTITLED SAN FERNANDO CT. 91-2
BOUNDARIES
DATE: JULY 1991 SCALE: 1' = 60'
BY: RIEDEN.K.
• CITY OF CUPERTINO •
♦ RECEIPT •
No. 762 2
5♦ DATE�1/1 - 191L
RECEIVED /j �/ -
• FROM -7 E✓I PE �/�+q-W John ,,,// /�
ADDRESS LG 6'7 `fir rl2a flo `- •
CASH CNECH MONEY
• ` / OPUER DOLLARS CENTS •
♦ /` r 00
- ate - 5
• •
DECEIVED
Y 23 OO
♦ B •
Ulu OVWN JlWl 55YS1FMS-1(/15)N MS 0
♦ 87, 30s
"EXHIBIT A"
Annexation to the City of Cupertino
Entitled San Fernando Ct. 91-2
Date: July 1991
All that real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 44 as shown on that certain map
entitled, "Tract No. 211, Stevens Creek Subdivision, Map No. 411, which map
was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the Canty of Santa
Clara, State of California, on April 6, 1942 in Volume 7 of Maps, at Page
31, said point also being along that certain annexation to the City of
Cupertino entitled "Blackberry Farm 91-0" by Resolution 8380:
Thence N 450331W, 66.15 feet along said annexation "Blackberry Farm
91-0" to the southwest corner of Lot 44;
Thence N 290211E, 121.93 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 44 said
point also being along the southerly right of way line of San Fernando
Court;
Thence along said southerly right of way line of San Fernando Court
through a curve to the right with a radial bearing S4203014311W, a radius
of 177.31 feet, a central angle of 1602713011, and an arc length of
50.93' to the northeast corner of lot 44;
Thence S 230431W, 135.45 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing: 0.16 Acres, more or less
6,750 Square Feet, more or less.
APN: 357-12-014
By: K.R. (G�nGV1�u
Gnome X � `
C
�� 30 S
• STEVENS CRK BLVD
` I
GRANADA
HERMOSA
N
� LOMITA
z
ALMADEN
SAN
SCALE: 1"=60' FERNANDO
ALCAZAR
Cr
DOIORES
\ 48 �11 cCLELLAN
LOCATION MAP
\ 47 A = 16.27'30"
\ 9� R = 177.31'
L = 50.93'
46
45 k� a� FFR��AIDO CT.
LOT 44 42
711 0. acres
ft. /^�
0.16 acres Q2�NM^`O
43
ANNEXATION �S•//
BLACKBERRY FARM 91-0 s6 �` -/
(RES. 8380) 41
\ P.O.B.
BOUNDARY LINE OF EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
EXISTING CITY ANNEXATION ENTITLED SAN FERNANDO CT. 91-2
BOUNDARIES
DATE: JULY 1991 SCALE: 1' = 60'
BY: RIEDEN,K.
CiL,y of Cmporl ino
NI:(:A'I'IVIi DECLARATION.'
May 21 , I')ri4
As provided by the Mvir4nux•nlal Anncs::nx•nt Prnredure, adopted by lbe Clly
Connell of Iho (:fly of Cnperl feet) ran N:nrh 71, 14171, as :mnonded , the follnwinl;
desrrlbed prsljerl waq granted a Negative Ilorlaralion by tile City Council of
the City tit' C:q,crl inn rile May 71 . MO .
I'ro jrva De::rr ipl 1.111 and I.111_al level
Applivalion 4-EA-84 Applicanl : Cily ..I Cnp,•rlln4 (UId 1,14nta vinla area)
L4rnl fun: Crner:illy boundod by Cr:a:nda Avenue In the-
Imperial Avenue to the east ,
Mt-CIE-1 I:m Road to the nmml b :elect by the
wos1e: 1y bnnndary of the Illockhorry
E.0 m Csl i f Cslorme Its Iho Went.
Dincre_t i_smary Art Islet Res nv_::t : Prezone and reznu.-
appraximalciv 97 arres willilu the Old Murata VL•:ta
:u•ea to It1-11 (IO•sldent la Single-famIIv) , RI -7.5
(Residi•nl Lol S(ogle-famlly) , 1' (Planned Development.
Wide a Regidelllfat 4.4-12 dwollfeel; mulls per gross
arre) , 1' (1'launcd Develupuu•nl with a Re::(denl fat
4 .4-7.7 dwelIfnl; units per gross: arre) . 1' (Pl marred
Developmoul wile Light Indm:a rlal and Renldeatial ) ,
P (I'lannrd II.•volnpim•nl Willi Agrir-nllare/Rerreal tonal ) ,
and Ill) (Public Itoildiul;) zslnlnl; districts.
l�iuJin);e: sll Ilcrisislmm:klnl; L'4dy
'I'hr Cfly Council granU•d a Ne);al ive Derinrat inn .(race tile- project Is cslusin(vnl
With the Ceneral I'I:ut and ea:: no %ignll trans dnvironnx•nl.al Imparts.
.lanx•s II. Sisk
I'launlnt; Ilirrrl or
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was riled
in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on May
22, 1984.
' 171
eputy City Clerk
Initi___�dl Study _
City of Cupertino
Environmental Assessment Procedures
E. A. File Number(s) 4-FA-84
Application File Number(s) 1-7.-84
Date February 27, 1984
The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, requires public
agencies to evaluate public and private projects to determine their poteneial
impact on the environment.
This worksheet is intended to provide guidance for both you, the applicant, and
City officials in assessing a proposed project to determine whether it may or
may not have a significant impact on the environment.
If, based upon the information provided below, the City makes a determination that
your project may have a significant impact on the environment, you will be required
co prepare an Environmental Impact Report as provided by State law and the City
of Cupertino 's Environmental Assessment requirements.
Detailed information regarding the environmental assessment procedure is avail-
able from the Director of Planning and Development.
Part I
Information to be completed by the Applicant
Project Type (Pre)Zoning Tentative Map u Other
Use Permit Variance
0 onto Vista Area geoeraliy bounded by Urana a venom ue to the nor T imperial
Location Avenue to the east , McClellan Road to the se ch and by the westerly boundary of
the Blackberry Farm Goll Course Lo ie wes .
Applicant City of Cupertino
Address of Applicant 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone (408) 252-4505
General Description of Project Prezone and rezone the above areas to zoning
districts consistent with the General Plan . The project Site contains approximately
97 acres.
Rev.7/8/80
-1-
Description of Project (coht 'd. )
Soecific Details of the Project
I. Size of Site NSA
2. Intensity of Development
(a) If residential:
(1) Number of units per gross acre
(2) Residential Unit Schedule :
Owner- No. of Size Estimated Total
Rental ship Bedrooms Sq.ft. Sales Price ( Number
Unit type 81
Unit type 92
Unit type U3
Unit type 04
Unit type 05
TOTAL
(3) Percentage in area of building coverage
Percentage in area of recreational open space
(4) Parking required Parking proposed
(b) If commercial, industrial, or institutional:
(1) Building square footage
(2) Percentage of building coverage of site
(3) Estimate of maximum number of employees per shift
(4) Parking required Parking proposed
-2-
Questions Related to Potential Impact of Project
A. Social/Cultural Impacts : Yes Mavbe No
(1) Will the proposed project result in the dis-
placement of people? X
(2) Will the project alter the employment base
of the community? X
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the community?
X
(4) Does the proposed project affect a historical
or archaelogical site? X (Note l)
B. Physical Impacts : (Page 4)
(1) Will the project result in a change of a natural
body of water, vegetative cover, or land form? X
(2) Will the project result in a change in a scenic
view or vista from existing residential area
or public lands or roads? X
(3) Will the project change the development pattern,
scale or character of general area of project? X
(4) Will the construction and/or operation of the
project result in significant amount of solid
waste, litter, dust, ash, smoke, fumes or
odors in the vicinity? X
(S) Will the project result in a change in stream
or ground water quality or quantity or altera-
tion of existing drainage patterns?
X
(6) Will the project substantially change existing
noise or vibration levels in the vicinity? X
(7) Is the project site on filled land or on
slope of 101 or greater? X
(8) Does the project involve the use or disposal
of potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammable or explosive? X
(9) Is the project a phase of an existing or
future larger project or series of projects? X
-3-
Description of the Environmental Setting
Provide the following information on a separate attachment:
(1) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural , historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
structures. A plot plan may be required for the description.
(2) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commer-
cial, etc. ) , intensity of land use (one-family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc. ) , and scale of devel-
opment (height , frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc. ) .
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements , and information pre-
sented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief. /,
(Signature)
For z5r L(J0eRyn l,o
(1 ) The 'project site is comprised of existing urban development including n
acre golf course and picnic ground recreation complex . The entire area
has general historic value. A few structures may have greater historical
value ns separate entities. The recreation complex is located in the
100-year event flood plan for Stevens Creek.
(2) The project area is bordered by the old N.onta Vista Commercial District
to the north, by the Went Valley Industrial Park to the east and by
single-family residential neighborhoods to the south and west .
-4-
Part I I
Information to be completed by City Officials.
A. Primary General Plan Considerations : Fes Navbe No
(1) Is the project in violation of the City of
Cupertino ' s adopted General Plan?
(2) Will the project burden public utilities and
services?
(a) Fire and police services X
(b) Parks and recreation system X
(c) Schools
X
(d) Water system X
(e) Sever system X
(f) Storm system X
(g) Solid waste X
(3) Is the project side outside of the Urban Ser-
vice Area of the City as defined by Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission?
B. Social/Cultural Impacts:
(1) Will the proposed project result in the dis-
placement of people? I X
(2) Will the project alter the employment base
of the community? X
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the co=unity? X
(4) Does the proposed project affect a histori-
cal or archaelogical site? X
(S) Will the proposed project eliminate an
existing recreational use at the project site? X
(6) Does the proposed project decrease public
access to any public body of water or recrea-
tional area? X
(i) Will the proposed project alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
-S-
(S) Will the project result in: y Yes Mavbe No
(a) The disturbance of a natural or man-made
feature in the project area which is unique? X
(b) The obstruction of a scenic vista open to
the public? X
C. Physical Impacts :
(1) Will the proposed project result in the exposure
of people or property to geologic hazards such
as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
failure or similar hazards? X
(2) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or physical
feature? X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soil, either on or off the site? X
(3) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
(4) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff? X
(b) Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? X
(c) Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
-A-
Yes Maybe No
(d) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground water? X
(e) Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals , or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavation? X
(f) Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public water
supplies? X
(g) Exposure of people or property to water-
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
wave. X
(5) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs , grass, crops , and aquatic plants? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? X
(c) Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? X
(e) Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X
(f) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
(g) Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? X
(h) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
(6) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Increase in existing noise levels? X
(b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
(7) Does the proposed project significantly affect
the potential use extraction or conservation of
a scarce natural resource such as agricultural
land, a mineral deposit, or woodland? X
Yes Mavbe No
(8) Will the proposed project involve the use,
storage, or disposal of hazardous materials? X
(9) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
X
(b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
(10) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? X »
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
(11) Mandatory Findings of Significance:
(a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? X
(b) Does the project have, the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (a short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time, while long-term impacts will
endure into the future. ) X
-8-
Yes Mavbe No
(c) Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? (A project may impact on two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small , but where
the effect of the total of those impacts
on the environment is significant. ) x
(d) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? x
Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
(Noce: Use additional sheets if necessary. )
Determination:
On the basis of this initial evaluation, the Environmental Review Committee finds:
,_I That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and therefore recommends the GRANTING OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
n That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
of the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. It is recommended that A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BE PREPARED.
�i That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date
ian, Environmental Review Committee
For
-9-
City of Cupertino (408)252-4505
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESE-KNOX LCXAL GOVERNI4a1T REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of
Cupertino for approval of a proposed change of organization or
reorganization, and stipulate(s) as follows:
1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the
California Government Code (commencing with Section 56000,
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985) .
2. The proposed change of organization is designated as:
"SAN FERNANDO COURT 91-2"
and consists of:
X annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO
XXXX)I.te= ttX1X=XX (name City/District)
of .16 (number of) acres on the South (rn/s/je/14
side of SAN FERNANDO COURT (Street/Avenue)
between SAN FFRNANDO (Street/Avenue)
and M(-CT FT.I AN ROAD (Street/Avenue)
and (if applicable) _ annexation
detachment
of the same to/from
(name City/District(s))
3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory(ies) included in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map
of said territory(ies) , marked Exhibit B, are attached to this
petition and by this reference incorporated herein.
4. The territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited.
("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited.
5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence
is not of the affected city and district(s) .
6. The reasons(s) for the proposed ANNEXATION (annexation,
detachment, reorganization, etc.) is/are:
TO PROCURE CITY SERVICES.
Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2-
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or
reorganization be made subject to the following terms and conditions:
B. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one) :
owner(s) of land within the affected territory.
registered voter(s) within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) do own 100% of the territory
do not proposed for change of
organization or
reorganization.
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in
accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government
Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows:
a= PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please print) Assessor's Election
name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct
Date si ture City/State/Zip No.* No.**
,100yy SAN FERNANaO CC.
TERFNCE mATTOuv COPERT/NO, CH, 9.5-OPY
Phone: NnR)2 SS-/4 73
';�0-9/ EyjEE �L�On o1.�0yySANFEP.NAN00 �• - -O/y
R£NEE M19TrOON C 0P6RT/N0, CA.950�
Phone: (!�Q$) ! -
�55-/'i7�
Phone (_) _-
* - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for
landowner-initiated proposals.
** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter
initiated proposals.
City of Cupertino (408)252-4505
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUPPLEMENPAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be Completed in full and submitted with
any petition to the City for a change of organization (annexation or
detachment) or reorganization (multiple annexations and/or detachments)
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox IAcal Government Reorganization Act of
1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.)
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: "SAN FFRNANDO COURT 91-21'
_
Annexation )
fttaLUM�t ) to/grim CITY OF CUPERTINO
RW1'TAXiZAk")4 (City or Spec. District)
ENyiRoNMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
X CITY OF CUPERTINO , as Lead Agency for environmental review
(Name of City/District)
of the project, has already PREZONED
(prezoned? other approval action?)
the territory on JUNE 4 , 1984 , and in ompliance with CEQA, has:
(date)
_ determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from
provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal.Adm.Code Sec.
(cite class exemption section) .
completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the
annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
ccapleted a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is
attached to this application.
_ City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the
environmental review of the project and the ccmpleted Environmental
Information Form required by Planning staff is attached to this
application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 252-4505.)
Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to
Cal. Ache. Code Sec. because
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA
1. Number of acres 1 (O ±
2. Number of inhabitants
3. Number of registered voters o2
4. Number of dwelling units
5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) :
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are
under contract under provisions of the Williamson
Act:
C. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken
to release the above parcel(s) from the contract?
-f�
6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied
by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing
requirement for city annexations) :
None
b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if
and when the territory is annexed to the City? YES_ NO X
If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought.
7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being
proposed for the territory, if any, and when this development is
expected to begin.
e
8. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of
assessment and ownership? YES X NO
If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide
justification for approving the boundary change as proposed:
Suppl. Appl. -2-
9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island,
corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES_ NO X
If YES, answer the following questions:
a. Number of acres in the island, corridor
or strip? (If more than one island is being
created, indicate the acreage of each island.)
b. Number of inhabitants?
C. Assessed value?
d. Iand use and zoning in island, corridor or strip?
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island:
f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation
of an island? YES NO
If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified.
SERVICES
10. Is the territory proposed for annexations'c�V&W "tmiixin
the city or District's urban service area: YES X NO
11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development
be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing
sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES_ NO X
If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc-
tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be fin-
anced by the formation of a special assessment district? YES_ NO X
If YES, describe service(s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per
resident/landowner of the district.
Service/irprovement:
Cost: $-_—/yr. for _ yrs. $ /yr. for _ yrs.
Supp. Appl. -3-
13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and
County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal.
(Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air
Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water
importation.) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this
information) :
CUPERTINO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT
FREMONT HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MID PENINSULA OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
FOOTHILL COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
14. Please provide the information requested bellow:
a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexatoin/detachment/reor-
ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent
by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with
date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated
by property-owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or
print names, addresses, etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed
land (not improvements) valuation, and, if 100% property-owner
consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must
100$
added prior to consideration. Hearing not required
if property owner consent is obtained.
Assessed
Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of
Date (Print name below) City/State/Zip Tel. No. No. Land
7- 1-91 "SEE PETITION" 22044 SAN FERNANDO 357-19-14
TERENCE MATTON CUPERTINO. CA 95014
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.)
* "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last
Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the Owner,
then any person entitled to be shown as owner of lard on the next
Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement
of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency
awning land." Government Code Section 56048.
Supp. Appl. -4-
15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to
exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Director of
ccm¢munity Development's Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in
addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or
district) :
street Address
Name City/State/Z1A
(1)
(2)
(3)
16. I hereby certify that all IAFCO filing requirements will be met and
that the statements made in this application are to the best of my
knowledge accurate.
TRAVICR WHITT N
(Print name of person ccmg�lete- CU ERTINO, CA 14
ing this application) (mess)
(Signature) (Eite)
NUPE: It is a general IAFOO filing requirement that a copy of this
application be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of
this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential
development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to
sutunit this information to the appropriate school district(s) and the
signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement
has been met.
rL �
"-2°,5,2 WELLS FARGO BANK 1 s o s
2 /51
SUNNYVALE OFFICE 295 SOUTH MATMLDA AVENUE SUNNYVALE,CA 940% �yT,
7 -J �'Y 1 19
E PAY TO THE ORDER OF $ 6 go'Oo/06` cy
e
TERENCE R. MATTOON
RENEE MATTOON
22D44 SAN FERNANDO CT. (408)2554/72
CUPERTINO.CA 95014
MEMO d4JA
1: 12i000248� 512 52582Sill
„1210(8)-2°,A1 WELLS FARGO BANK 1607
SUNNYVALE OFFICE 295 SOUTH MATHLOA AVENUE SUNNYVALE,CA 94085
9i
E PAY TO THE ORDER OFU/
1 o b °°
t _ /OG AP5
en TERE C ATTOON
RENEE MATTOON
--
22044 SAN FERNANDO CT. (408)255-1472
CUPERTITIINO.CA 95014
MEMO
1: 1, 21000248e: C307 05i2 5258251I'
y
11 aS G$PA TE Ql j
Order✓ 450921 FEB-7-83C 2463 #20 _ -
Escrow I rEl"Jill`"f
Loan No. REC FEE JJJa~a 22VV VV
Recorded at the request of
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: MICRO First ArllericanTitle Guaranty Co.
LIEN H`i FEB 7 1983 too
Terence R. Matcon - A.M.
Mee A. Aaluilanlo SMPf22044 George A.Mmn,Recadet
Cupertino, CA 95014 pert San Fernando Ct. Santa Clara County,0lticialRecords
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: CITY TRANSFER TAX a -n-
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX a 167.20
SURVEY MONUMENT PRESERVATION FUND a —0—
**saRe is above** .._..Canputad on lnacon.NeraWn arable W aaptany cemerM;OR
......Cont tutael on the rlcnaldaradon or Take,1.here Or encamb—
rYMIram at tMM or ml4
,YNre Ds eM a clot lb,m Y"- ,m !ma
FIRST AMERICIsN TITLE r[RFANPY COMPANY
A.P.0 357-12-014
INSURED GRANT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged.
tt FRANK J. TYRrfaL and HAREMS+ A. TYRRE[L, husband and wife
1 hereby GRANTIS) to
41 TEFOKE R."74ATIOON,an uruTo ried man, and REIM A. ACQUnANO, an unmarried avoarl, as
M joint tenants
the real property in the City of Cupertino:
County of Santa Clara Stator of California. described BE
Int 44, "Tract 211 Stevens Creek Subdivision Map No. 4", Map filed in the Canty of
Santa Clara, tr April 6, 1942 in Rook 7 of Maps, Page 31
February 1, 1983 ���
Dated
Frank J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I
COUNTY OF IR J
Barbara A. Tyrrell r
On Ilehn,axq, 1, 1991
before me, the undersigned. a Notat, Public in a1N for aid
Sure, perspn.l lyyTg oil an a rre
pro t0 on the balls of satisfactory evideill>o OFFICIA I. SEAL
MARIIYIJ RAYE
known uo me to be the persons whore name are •`' NOIARI FVLUC �C..L6pFNIA
j
.pb:<rib.d to me -train netrnmem .nd sknoynedaed that
sANm annA rnuNlr
the MY comm. vlurr AUG 12. 1983
e.erpted thetma. - �
WIT SS my he- and offitlel Pal
S'an ^-/ IThb a,- IPr ollklal noYrbl wll
Marilyn Raye FOAM 04280(2179)
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
i