The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 03-19-2024 Item No. 1 Study Session CIPFrom:Allan Liang To:City Council Subject:Please delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 10:37:20 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Council of Cupertino City, Please delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. The current traffic on Bollinger Road is crowed in the traffic time. I don't think it is a good idea to change it into one lane road. Please put my comments into the public record. Regards, Allan Liang From:Andrea L To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Re: Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP [a SUV crashed into our house after colliding with another car on Bollinger several years ago] Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:40:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I forgot to mention that my family and I have been living at W Estates Dr in Cupertino for the last decade, in a corner house bounded by 3 streets Bollinger Rd, W Estates Dr, and Estates Dr, on the part of S curve on Bollinger where visibility is limited due to the road curves. Our backyard is facing and is right next to Bollinger Rd. In 2019, a SUV crashed past our backyard fence after colliding with another car. The SUV crossed through our backyard after going past the fence, and crashed past the outer wall of the sunroom into the middle of the sunroom, where my husband, I, our baby, and a neighbor were at that time. I sat on a chair facing the fence/Bollinger Rd and saw the SUV going towards us/the sunroom. However, my husband holding our baby stood up facing me, so he could not see the SUV as it went towards us. Thankfully he swiftly moved away upon hearing my scream. The SUV finally stopped in the middle of the sunroom but towards the west side of the structure, missing us by a mere few feet. Here's a video of the car inside our sunroom https://photos.app.goo.gl/oB7qEZuWA6u1BkKv9. I also attached more pictures of the accident and damages: https://photos.app.goo.gl/dNYyZ5EeHQ4Va8tf8 Thankfully the roof didn't collapse on us when the car crashed into and when it backed out, we didn't get hurt by any shattered window glasses, and there's no gas leaks causing explosion! The second car (Sedan) which collided into the SUV on Bollinger thankfully stopped at the corner of Bollinger and Estates before it hit our fence, but this second car could easily crash into our house too had it been on a higher speed and the driver was not as capable. Having lived here for many years, I have heard and saw several accidents on Boliinger Rd near the back of our house. One night a few years ago a car crashed into a tree on Bollinger in front of the house on Bollinger (San Jose side), a few houses to our East. Thankfully the car was stopped by the tree and didn't crash into the house. A few years ago, I saw a minivan crashed into the concrete low fence of a house facing Bollinger Rd, a couple blocks West of our house. Again, thankfully the car only damaged the concrete fence and not go past the fence crashing into the house. Bollinger Rd is a very dangerous street because it is a 4 lane wide street where most vehicles go 45-50 mph despite the 35 mph posted speed limit and there's the S curve portion where the road is winding and visibility is low even during the day time. There's no bright street light at night to improve the visibility on the curve. I saw lots of vehicles turning left from Estates Dr merging to Bollinger Rd, where the S curve prevents vehicles turning left to see oncoming traffic, despite the large sign saying no turn left. Even turning right from Estates to Bollinger is very difficult to see oncoming traffic due to the road curve. So there are a lot of potential vehicular accidents right next to our house. I saw lots of large vehicles such as buses and trucks passing by as well throughout the day. Please prioritize the safety of Cupertino residents and support Bollinger Traffic Study! Regards, Andreana On Tue, Mar 19, 2024, 12:14 PM Andrea L <4ndr3ana@gmail.com> wrote: Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Regards, Andreana From:Anne Ng To:City Council Subject:bollinger road in CIP program Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:52:01 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Honorable Councilmembers: As a Bollinger Road resident, a pedestrian, and a cyclist, I implore you to keep the Bollinger Road Corridor Design project in the CIP budget. The busy arterial is also a primarily residential street. It's dangerous. The bike lanes are a mixed blessing, since for the most part, they're completely in the door zone of parked cars. (I've been "doored" once, years ago--in a bike lane.) Cars speed by at up to 50 mph. Please do the study!! Anne Ng 6031 Bollinger Road Cupertino 95014 From:Biao He To:City Council Subject:Please Keep Bollinger 4 lanes ! Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:55:25 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I live just near Bollinger road, this road has significant traffic and it needs to be 4 lanes! Otherwise the traffic will very bad and residents will left Cupertino. Please protect our living environment and make the world better ! From:Bing Shao To:City Council Subject:About changes to the Bollinger road Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 6:52:06 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please put my comments into the public record. Bing Shao Sent from my iPhone From:C Z To:City Council Subject:Strong Opposition to the Proposal of Converting Bollinger to Single Lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:56:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino City Council, I am writing to you as a resident who lives just a block away from Bollinger and a regular commuter on Bollinger Rd, to express my strong opposition to the recent proposal of converting Bollinger from a double lane to a single lane road, with one of the lanes being designated as a bike lane. While I understand and appreciate the council's efforts to promote cycling and other eco-friendly modes of transportation, I am deeply concerned that this specific change would exacerbate the existing traffic conditions, rather than alleviating them. Bollinger rd is a critical artery for many commuters in our community, serving as a key connector from Lawrence Express to De Anza for several neighborhoods, schools, and business districts. During rush hours, the road is already heavily congested, with traffic often slowing to a crawl. The road's layout, which includes several curves and limited visibility in sections, further complicates the traffic flow and demands the utmost attention and caution from all road users. Reducing Bollinger to a single lane for vehicular traffic, in my opinion, will not only fail to solve the existing traffic issues but will indeed make them significantly worse. The introduction of a bike lane, while beneficial in theory, must be carefully considered against the overall impact on traffic dynamics, safety, and the practicalities of daily commuting for the majority of the road users. Furthermore, I am concerned about the safety implications for both cyclists and motorists. This road lacks traffic lights (as residents we raised this issue many times in the past but was ignored) and its current design and visibility issues could pose heightened risks if a significant portion of the road is reallocated for bicycles, especially without comprehensive measures to ensure safe coexistence between different types of road users. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the City Council to reconsider this proposal. I advocate for a more thorough analysis of the potential impacts, including traffic studies and consultations with traffic engineers, local businesses, emergency services, and the community at large. It is crucial that any changes to our city's infrastructure not only promote sustainable transportation options but also consider the practical implications for all residents and ensure the safety and efficiency of our roads. Thank you for considering my concerns. I look forward to your response and to a solution that best serves the interests of our entire community. Sincerely, Amanda C From:Calley Wang To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Traffic Study in the Capital Improvement Plan Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:22:24 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Esteemed Mayor Mohan, Cupertino City Council and Staff, I encourage Council to support the Bollinger Road Design and Traffic Analysis CIP item. The safety of our residents should be prioritized. This short stretch of road has seen two fatalities in just the past few years, and many more accidents and near-misses. Many pedestrians and cyclists avoid using Bollinger at all, due to the numerous safety issues including vehicle speeding above the limit, the curved road and bike lanes next to parked cars which cause bike lane incursions and potential “dooring”, and unsafe pedestrian crossings including no marked crossings for ½ mile stretches. I am from Cupertino and frequently drive on Bollinger. The current design is clearly unsafe and inadequate for both drivers and pedestrians, especially near the De Anza intersection at Trader Joe's. I see people walking to and from Trader Joe's either into the local neighborhoods or to the bus stop but struggling to navigate all the traffic. The curved segment past Blaney is almost designed to encourage speeding. When our house was being renovated for major improvements, my family temporarily lived on the other side of Bollinger in West San Jose. We saw how difficult it is to walk across even for a simple visit to the library or to shop at businesses on the Cupertino side at Bollinger and Blaney. This CIP item is to perform a traffic study, and then make a design using that information. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item does not approve any construction changes on Bollinger. It is merely a step toward deciding what we as a city want to do to address the real safety concerns. It's a chance to examine improvements that could save lives. The study and design have received a state grant covering 80% of the funding, with only 20% required in matching funds ($100K). This is a modest expenditure that we have in our CIP budget, especially considering that previous year CIP projects have come in under budget so there are extra funds. Thank you for considering my input, and your work on behalf of Cupertino. Best, Calley Wang Master of Urban Planning NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service '24 csw9856@nyu.edu | 408 832 2346 From:Changdao Dong To:City Council Subject:Stop plan to modify Bollinger road! Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 6:37:06 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Bollinger road is already very busy with double lane. It is a disaster to change it to single lane! DONG, Changdao MP: 1-412-551-2330 dongchangdao@gmail.com From:Ching Lien To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Please maintain Bollinger Road"s existing lanes Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 11:06:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, Please maintain Bollinger Road's existing lanes. The traffic is already congested during the rush hours. If the 4 lanes are to be reduced to 2, the traffic congestion will definitely get worse and the traffic safety will be immensely degraded. Besides, we, the residents in the neighborhood, should have a way to express our opinion regarding this issue. Your decision will impact our lives immeasurably. Please make your process of decision making transparent. Moreover, please delay the funding of the Bollinger Road corridor design. Thank you. Ching (a citizen in the neighborhood of Bollinger Rd) From:Christine Cheng To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Please support Alternative B on Bollinger Road. Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:41:24 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council members, We are very concerned that there’s a suggestion to convert the Bollinger Road from four lanes to two lanes. Bollinger Road has already been a busy road with a lot of cars, especially during commute time. The traffic caused by lane reduction will negatively impact people’s lives. Pedestrian & bicycle safety can be done by s few spot adjustment, there is no need to do the lane reduction for the road. The pros far outweigh the cons to keep the way it is. Please don’t do lane conversion!! Thank you very much for your understanding and support! Regards, Christine, Jane, Adalia & Isaac Cupertino residents for 20+ years From:Connie Cunningham To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:44:15 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. My good friend lives off East Estates Drive that connects with Bollinger. Many years ago, I made the decision to NOT use Bollinger because of the curve in the road that 1) obscures cars that are on Bollinger Drive from the driver trying to exit East Estates Drive, and 2) obscures cars that are on E. Estates Drive from the drivers on Bollinger Road. You cannot enter or leave E. Estates safely at that intersection. Since my friend uses Safeway, that makes the drive for her either circuitous out of her neighborhood, or extremely dangerous if she uses Bollinger. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Connie Cunningham (Housing Commission, Self only) From:David Alessio To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:59:53 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Best regards, /David S. Alessio/ From:Debbie Timmers To:City Council Subject:Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/2025 and Five-year Plan Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:39:41 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Esteemed Mayor Mohan, Cupertino City Council and Staff, I encourage Council to support the Bollinger Road Design and Traffic Analysis CIP item. Bollinger Road from De Anza Blvd to Lawrence Expressway goes through a residential neighborhood. There are a large number of students that could use it to walk or bike to their elementary school, Hyde Middle School, and Cupertino High School. This road needs to be safe for all. The collision data from the study suggests that improvements can and should be made to enhance safety. We need to prioritize the safety of our residents. I understand that drivers feel the pedestrian traffic is a nuisance and they simply want to speed through that area to get to their destination, but we should care about the people that live in our community, whose first choice may be to walk or bike, but currently feel unsafe in doing so. I enthusiastically support doing a traffic study, and then make a design using that information. We need to start this first step toward deciding what we as a city want to do to address real safety concerns. The majority of this study will be funded through a grant. This is a modest expenditure that we have in our CIP budget, especially considering that previous year CIP projects have come in under budget so there are extra funds. I believe it is worth it to protect both the safety of our residents who live there and those who need to use that road. Thank you for considering my input, and your work on behalf of Cupertino. Debbie Timmers From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:28:52 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Kaushal Kanikaram <kanikaramk@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:27:35 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <CityManager@cupertino.org> Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This CIP item is about safety, though, and not just traffic throughput. There have been two fatalities on Bollinger Avenue in the past few years, and collisions and near-misses. This analysis and design will positively impact the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. I have biked many times on my way to and from Cupertino high school via Bollinger Rd and to Lynbrook to meet friends so this study could be very important to get important insights into resident safety. Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year. Thank you for considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Kaushal From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Please don"t change Bollinger to one way!!! Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:12:46 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Xiang Wu <wuselina@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:10:16 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Subject: Please don't change Bollinger to one way!!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino City Council member, I'm a cupertino residence for 20 years, please don't change Bollinger to one way! It will add more traffic to already crowded stevens creek and prospect. It will also make nearby school and grocery store traffic worse. Big no! Thanks, Selina From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:11:58 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Ron Meulman <ronmeulman@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:08:28 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This CIP item is about safety, though, and not just traffic throughput. There have been two fatalities on Bollinger Avenue in the past few years, and collisions and near-misses. This analysis and design will positively impact the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year. Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sent from my iPhone From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: March 19 2024 CC Study Session Item 1 CIP 5 yr plan Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:08:11 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Lisa Warren <la-warren@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:06:49 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Cc: Susan Michael <susanm@cupertino.org>; Chad Mosley <chadm@cupertino.org>; Matt Morley <mattm@cupertino.org> Subject: March 19 2024 CC Study Session Item 1 CIP 5 yr plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. City Council and Staff, Please do not continue with any studies or projects related to the Bollinger Rd Corridor RE-Design. This is low priority item/project that has not at all benefited from public comments and outreach. I believe that the survey as well as the traffic study were done 'during Covid' which we all should understand was not a good time to get useful data. Any study performed in the past and particularly during a dramatic decrease of cars on the roads due to pandemic, will be entirely inadequate. In addition to that, a survey that is completed during the same pandemic period is not useful for a project like this. Top that with the fact that both Cupertino and San Jose are currently, and will continue to, increase both full time resident AND daytime/commuter residents. This will dramatically increase the number of automobiles, and potentially other modes of transportation (bike, bus, etc). Any study performed in the past and particularly during a dramatic decrease of cars on the roads due to pandemic, should be considered very poor data. Limiting Bollinger Rd. to one driving lane in each direction would risk creating a situation where commuters/drivers will choose routes thru neighborhood streets to avoid a very congested main artery that would basically become a neighborhood street with far too many automobiles. Both Lawrence Expy and DeAnza Blvd, and likely Miller Ave will be more congested in the not so distant future and with Bollinger being one of the connecting, and well used arteries, the result could very well be that these roadways suffer greatly in the congestion index. Bollinger is also a route that public safety vehicles use.... they need room to get around traffic !!! AND... we, as a city, have higher priorities and NOT enough money. Thank you ' Lisa Warren frequent driver in and about these streets. From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:02:05 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Eben M Haber <eben@habers.us> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:00:31 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I bicycle across Cupertino on my way to work. I used to take Bollinger, but it’s busy, narrow, and doesn’t feel particularly safe. I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. A study might pinpoint ways to improve the safety of this corridor. Thank you for considering my input. Regards, Eben Haber 17450 Stevens Canyon Rd Cupertino, CA 95014 From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: bollinger road plan Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:50:56 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: eric <feng54166@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:24:50 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Subject: bollinger road plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I'm a resident living in West San Jose, near Bollinger Road. Heard there is propose to change Bollinger Road to single lane, I thiink it's not proper for the change, it will make people hard to go in and out of the area, so I'm against the plan. Regards, Eric From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:50:29 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Carols Gmail <carolstaneks@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:29:44 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I write today in support of the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Traffic safety has already been identified by our City as a priority for our residents. We need to do our homework (aka “Traffic Study”) to find the best possible solutions to dangerous areas such as Bollinger. Cupertino needs to leverage all opportunities to make our precious dollars go as far as possible. It would be penny wise and pound foolish to turn away an 80% grant for the Traffic Study. We cannot afford to not take advantage of these grant $. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our stated goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you, Carol Stanek From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:50:03 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Jian He <jianhe7@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:33:11 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, This is Jian He, a Cupertino resident and a Walk-Bike Cupertino member. I heard that you are going to make decisions on the CIP items this evening and I hope you will approve the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. I personally biked there multiple times to pick up medicines from Walgreen. It was frightening to bike along speedy cars on the narrow lane. Please approve the funds on this important project which will definitely impact the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High, and adults like me who bike around the town to get errands done. So glad to hear that 80% of the study is already funded through a grant. This would be a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you so much for your good work for our city Cupertino. May God bless you and guide you in all these tasks in public service! -- Blessings, Jian "...all things work together for good..." --- Romans 8:28 From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Please Don’t Change Bollinger Road to One Way Road Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:49:36 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Rebecca Wen <rebeccawencupertino@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:37:58 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Subject: Please Don’t Change Bollinger Road to One Way Road CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi City Council, Please don’t change the Bollinger Road into one way road. As a resident who has a boy who enrolled in the John Muir Elementary, my family and I drive on the Bollinger road multiple times to pick up and send my boy to school. The two way traffic is MUCH more convenient for parents and students live nearby. I cannot imagine how much more traffic jam we will have if this very important road becomes one way only. That means that we have to reroute a long way and spend more time on the way every day. The one way Bollinger will make other parallel roads more jammed because people need to drive around to get the places they want to go. Thanks, Xiao Wen From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Bollinger Road Project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:48:57 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: mzhang <myyzhang@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:45:50 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Subject: Bollinger Road Project CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino City, My name is Michael Zhang and I am a Cupertino resident. I oppose to reduce the Bollinger road from 2 lanes to single lane (on each direction) for the Bollinger Road. Bollinger Road is a major road for Cupertino and West San Jose residents. There are already bike lanes on Bollinger road, and reduce 2 lanes to one lane for Bollinger Road will cause heavy traffic. I suggest the City Staff to use that project money to do more important task for the Cupertino residents instead for the Bollinger road lane reduction. Thanks, Michael Zhang From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Regarding Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:31:49 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: L L <Lli.ll@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:23:28 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov>; City Clerk <cityclerk@cupertino.gov> Subject: Regarding Bollinger Road Corridor Design CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, I saw the proposal to change Bollinger Rd to 1 lane road. This sounds like an absurd proposal from someone do not live in the area, or do not need to comminute to work. Please consider the hardworking people who pay you all the tax in the area, who also need to commute daily on this road. Changing it to a 1 lane road will not only be a disaster to the traffic, but also create more pollution because of the traffic jam. Regards, Lin From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:15:27 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: charlie hanson <cehanson42@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:14:06 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to NOT SUPPORT the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Half of Bollinger is controlled by the city of San Jose and we have no control of what they are proposing. All i hear is BUILD< BUILD< BUILD which will impact our city. Residents are going to travel from point A to point B and we should get them off our streets ASAP, not slow them down. Sincerely C Hanson From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:11:57 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Juliet Shearin <juliet.shearin@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:10:53 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I am writing to you today to urge you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Funding a study means providing real data to back up what residents are already experiencing. As a former Cupertino High School student who still regularly bikes on Bollinger Road, I have experienced many close calls with cars. It’s hard not to think about the two residents we’ve already lost to the unsafe conditions on Bollinger. This study would benefit not just me, but our students at Hyde Middle School, Cupertino High School, and Lynbrook High School. This study also won’t have a traffic impact— it just means that we will have a better idea of the issues on Bollinger Road and how we can improve them for our students and the many residents who bike on Bollinger or walk alongside it. Eighty percent of the study is already paid for through a grant, so the fiscal impact would be minimal. With a tight budget this year, it’s more important than ever that we make use of grant money, rather than deferring this study and having to pay more later. I strongly encourage you to include this study on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sincerely, Juliet Shearin From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:06:20 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Santosh Gogi <santoshag@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:52:15 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:06:01 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Debra Nascimento <DebraN@cupertino.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:56:35 PM To: Melissa Robertson <MelissaR@cupertino.gov> Subject: Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Santosh Gogi <santoshag@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:53 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Regards, Santosh Gogi 10810 Farallone Dr, Cupertino, CA 95014 From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:05:47 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Emma Shearin <eeshearin@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:02:12 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I am writing to you today solely in my capacity as a resident, and not as a representative of the TICC commission, to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. I live a short walk from Bollinger, and it is the shortest route to many destinations, but I could never consider biking on Bollinger due to the many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths. The city spends much more on much less. This project addresses public safety and the quality of life of many residents, including children going to school at Hyde, CHS, and Lynbrook. Since this CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety, it can’t negatively affect traffic. This is a great way to make our budget go farther, given the 80% grant funding. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list to 5x our money. Thank you for your time and consideration! Best, Emma From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:05:24 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Trent Poltronetti <tpoltron@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:03:49 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, Please support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. With safer and more comprehensive cycling options, more people will choose to bike instead of drive, which is better for us all. Thanks, Trent Poltronetti 10201 Hillcrest Rd, Cupertino From:Debra Nascimento To:Melissa Robertson Subject:Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:56:50 PM Debra Nascimento Executive Assistant City Manager's Office DebraN@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1302 From: Santosh Gogi <santoshag@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:53 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.gov> Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <citymanager@cupertino.gov> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Regards, Santosh Gogi 10810 Farallone Dr, Cupertino, CA 95014 From:dicksteinp@aol.com To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Road Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:09:34 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Bollinger Road, which connects with Moorpark, is a major through road, not a purely local street. It should not be reduced to one lane in each direction. Phyllis Dickstein Cupertino resident From:du vote To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Concerning about funds allocation to the Bollinger road while Cupertino is under short funds crisis Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:38:55 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and city council, I am a long time Cupertino resident and recently a little bit concerned about Cupertino's funds crisis when see city may potentially cut some services or have people maintain streets or trees by themselves. On another end, we heard that there might be come with the Bollinger road project which could cost 4Millions for 5 years funds plan. Though the money might not all come from Cupertino city, it still needs not small amount of money from city. This really raises the question that why we spend so much money on a project which does not serve people's real needs. Bollinger road is a heavily used road and many people use it everyday for work, shopping. The needs for people driving through this road is pretty heavy. We need it for people's daily life while those money could be and should be used in more needed area. Please help to consider delay the funds allocation to the Bolling road project and thank you in advance for considering our voice. Thanks & Regards, Vera From:Elizabeth Joseph To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:I support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:46:19 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, Please support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. As someone with children who used to go to Hyde Middle School, with a husband who bikes throughout Cupertino often, and who drives there (and doesn’t want to cause any accidents) I urge you to support the study to see if we can make things safer. Thank you, Elizabeth Joseph 19782 Bixby Dr, Cupertino From:Erica Hsu To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Please DELAY the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:48:14 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it concerns, PLEASE DELAY the funding of Bollinger Road Corridor Design. PLEASE postpoint the funds allocation ot the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. I do not want my street TANTAU ave to be a very busy traffic street since there is a lot of walking home kids. Please put my email comments into the PUBLIC record. From the residents of Cupertino, the Hsu family. Thanks. From Erica's iPhone. Please excuse for any typo error. From:Erica Liao To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Please DELAY the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:50:26 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it concerns, PLEASE DELAY the funding of Bollinger Road Corridor Design. PLEASE postpoint the funds allocation ot the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. I do not want my street TANTAU ave to be a very busy traffic street since there is a lot of walking home kids. Please put my email comments into the PUBLIC record. From the residents of Cupertino, the Hsu family. Thanks. From Erica's iPhone. Please excuse for any typo error. From:Genesis palma To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:41:30 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Genesis Palma Shearin From:Gengfu Xu To:City Clerk Subject:Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 10:41:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am a local resident who drive on Bollinger road every day and it is already a lot of traffic on bollinger road every morning! Please don't start the Bollinger Road Corridor Design ! Gengfu Xu 3065 Cameron way Santa Clara, CA 95951 Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone From:Geoff Hall To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Input on Bollinger Lane proposals Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:41:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My name is Geoff Hall and I live just off Bollinger Rd, at Hyde Avenue. I only recently learned of the study for possible changes to Bollinger In many ways I should be a beneficiary of any Bollinger Rd work as I regularly commute and shop by bike, and I think one stated intent is to improve things for bike riders and pedestrians. In the mornings I head north along Hyde to cross Bollinger. In the evenings I travel south along Tantau, travel briefly westwards along Bollinger before turning left into Hyde. Most weeks I travel further along Bollinger by bike, either eastwards to the block of shops near CVS on Moorpark or westwards to the library or to cross De Anza and head via Stelling to the shops on Stevens Creek. In general, I find Bollinger to feel pretty safe with the marked bike lanes as they are. There are two exceptions where work could immediately be done to improve things, one of these being a distinct safety hazard. The first safety issue arises from the general lane layout on Bollinger. For much of the length of the road there are no dedicated turn provisions, with two traffic lanes in each direction, bike lanes and reserved space for parking. Elsewhere there is no car parking provision and in some cases a dedicated turn lane. The transition between these can cause problems. I hope that my included link to a Google Streetview picture will show the problem on westbound Bollinger just before Hyde: https://www.google.com/maps/@37.3106894,-122.0093419,3a,37.5y,264.87h,87.15t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPY3bktvHVB1PDh5qF- ucIA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu The marked lanes, including the bike lane, move towards the right in order to make space for a turn lane into Hyde. The problem is that cars are legally allowed to park where the bike lane is already moving right, narrowing the lane and potentially forcing bikes into the main traffic lanes. It is rare for a car to be parked there but it has happened and that makes for a very scary situation, especially in the rush hour at night. There may be other similar locations but that is the one that I am aware of. The second safety issue arises from the lane markings on eastbound Bollinger just east of the junction with Miller until the turn for the Safeway car park. These were recently repainted, keeping a large blank area to the right and directing Safeways traffic to stay in the main traffic lane until the entrance has been reached. Previously such traffic was encouraged to stay right and allow through traffic to pass on the main lanes to the left. This change may well have been well intentioned to make things safer for bikes and pedestrians, but it has made things worse. It is now much more difficult to judge the intentions of the drivers, making it somewhat more scary to be biking past the Safeway entrance. In addition I've seen a near accident where the main traffic lanes were going slowly and a driver wishing to go into the Safeways car park went through the empty area, only for a driver obeying the markings to do a right turn into the car park, causing a near miss. I believe that the previous lane markings were safer all round. If the recent changes were intended as a safety enhancement it makes me question the methodology involved. For the general question of whether to make spot improvements or to reduce to a single traffic lane in both directions, I mentioned the issue to my family and they were fairly incredulous that road narrowing would be seriously considered. As well as the wasted travel time and dubious benefits, I would think there would be a higher density of slow moving traffic and some additional air pollution hazards for people living nearby. I am aware that there are dangerous aspects to Bolliinger Road as it currently exists, the most egregious of which are, in my opinion, the multiple places where traffic wishing to turn left into a side street must block the flow of traffic behind. I think that much could be done by reducing the portions of Bolliinger where street parking is allowed and using the freed up space to make dedicated turn lanes. I also suggest that any studies aimed at improving road conditions take a long look at traffic patterns by Hyde Middle School at pickup and dropoff times. Thanks, -- Geoff From:Geoff Paulsen To:City Council Cc:Jennifer Shearin; Larry Dean Subject:Bollinger Road Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:30:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Honorable Council Members: If we are serious about protecting the lives of our bicyclists and pedestrians, it would behoove us to include in this year‘s CIP list a study of Bollinger Rd.. As a founding member of our Cupertino Bicycle Pedestrian Commission, I am concerned about these issues. I also remember former Cupertino Planning Director Steve Piaseki saying, “We move car traffic through Cupertino very well - perhaps too well…” Unfortunately Cupertino was laid out in an era where little regard was given to any means of transportation other than cars. But times are changing, and with growing concerns about global environmental issues, it’s important for Cupertino to uphold its reputation as a city of innovation by improving Bollinger Rd. - and saving lives in the process. Regards, Geoff Geoff Paulsen former chair, Cupertino Planning Commission (408) 480-7509 cell From:GMAIL To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Strongly Oppose Change Bollinger Two Lanes to One Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:12:00 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Clerk and Council, My name is Li and I am a resident close to Bollinger. I use Bollinger at least 4 times a day to send and pick up my kids. During rush hour of picking up kids, Bollinger is extremely busy and we have to wait one or two red light to pass Miller and Johnson. If it is one lane, the waiting time will be double or triple. It is really not convenient for the residents near by. Thank you so much for considering our opinion. Best regards, Li From:Grace Kong To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:29:51 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. I have two high school students in our household. They have been biking to school since middle school. Our home is right off Bollinger and Miller. Our teens now commute to high school everyday. They also use their bikes to get to their tutoring off De Anza. The problem with this road is that west towards De Anza becomes very windy so drivers sometimes do not see cyclists like my sons commuting along Bollinger as cars speeds are greater than that of cyclists. I urge those in power to invest in our safety as it is vital to keeping the neighborhoods safe. Please support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Thank you. Grace Kong Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sent from my iPhone From:Guoming Shou To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Bollinger Rd needs to have two lanes Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 10:58:05 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I heard that Bollinger rd is going to be a one lane rd for cars. No, this is not acceptable. I have two kids in Hyde Middle School. It will be a mess if Bollinger rd is reduced to one lane for cars. Almost all kids are dropped off and picked up by parents using cars, not bikes. Even with two lanes, it is still very crowded in the morning and mid afternoon. Guoming Shou From:HaHa To:City Council Subject:stop the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:37:33 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Sir / Madam, as a cupertino resident, I strongly against the Bollinger Road Corridor plan to change the 4 auto lanes to two. Cupertino doesn't have the fund and the new design will make the congested Bollinger more congested. This is absolutely not good for us and the whole traffic of lawrence and De Anza, therefore further influence the traffic of the whole area. Please put my comment into the public record. Thanks, Zhan From:hailin xu To:City Council Subject:Opposition to Proposed Modification of bollinger Rd to a single Lane Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:28:36 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed modification of Bollinger Rd into a single lane. This road is experiencing significant congestion, serving as a vital artery connecting three nearby schools, Hyde Middle School, Lynbrook High School, and Miller Middle School, and linking to Lawrence Expressway. Converting it into a single lane would exacerbate congestion issues, impacting surrounding city residents as well. Moreover, considering the purportedly tight budget this year, allocating resources towards initiatives that would benefit the community seems more prudent. Instead of converting Bollinger Rd, these funds could be directed towards projects that enhance accessibility and convenience for all residents. I urge the City Council to reconsider this proposal and prioritize solutions that address the pressing needs of our community while maintaining the efficiency of Bollinger Rd as a crucial transportation route. Please add my comment to the meeting minutes. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Hailin Xu 6136 W Walbrook Dr, San Jose, CA Sent from my iPhone From:Helene Davis To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:52:32 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Council members, I urge you during your study session today on the CIP to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Bollinger is an especially important east/west arterial and a conduit for students traveling to and from Hyde Middle School, Cupertino High School and Lynbrook High School. The road is designed in such a way that the speeds are high and the safety of cyclists and peds is low. A study to explore designs that could improve our students' and residents' safety is a small thing to ask. I understand that eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. I believe the city always strives to make our community a safer, healthier place to live and this is one step forward to that goal. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for all you do for Cupertino. Respectfully, Helene Davis From:Herve Marcy To:City Council Subject:City Council CIP review Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 11:13:04 PM Councilmembers, it is my understanding that during tomorrow's session, council will give guidance to City staff as to what to keep on the CIP list this year. I'd like to emphasize the need for the following projects: - As unanimously voted during our bike ped commission meeting, the Bollinger Road Design and Traffic Analysis is badly needed. This highly used corridor is a nightmare for cyclists and pedestrians and I urge you to keep that project on the CIP list to better understand how to make that street safer for all residents. - The McLellan Road Bridge replacement has received 75% of its funding and staff expects no city outlay. We need to make this renovation happen, as per City staff: we should "do it right for the next 100 years". - The High Friction Pavement & Speed Feedback Signage in locations on several of our high- volume roads: to make sure our infrastructure is aligned with the needs of all residents. Thanks for your consideration. Best regards, Hervé Marcy Chair of the Cupertino Bike-Ped commission, speaking in my name only. Herve Marcy Bicycle and Pedestrian Commissioner HMarcy@cupertino.gov From:hetalian person To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:42:54 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. As a student currently attending Cupertino High School who cannot drive and who uses a e-scooter to travel, road safety is of upmost importance to me. I have often felt this road was unsafe for cyclists and pedestrians alike and seeing that it’s true with 2 deaths, this study is important to keep members of our communities safe with their lives intact. This study well-worth the budget spent with fears being untrue, please consider and prioritize the lives of our community members. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino, Xinpei Lu From:Hong Cong To:City Council Subject:No change to Bollinger Road Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 8:41:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, My daughter is a student of John Muir Elementary School. After I drop her at the school, drive to Lawrence through Bollinger Road, it is very crowded. If changing Bollinger to a single line, it will be a disaster. It is not our choice if we can find a job nearby to ride a bicycle. Since the tax revenue for Cupertino is decreasing, why spend money to turn Bollinger into more severe traffic congestion? Please stop!!! Best regards, Cindy Cong From:Hsing-Yen Lin To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Disagree to reduce Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:36:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern: I can’t believe that you are considering reducing Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes. Bollinger Rd is a very busy street connecting De Anza Blvd. and Lawrence ExpressWay. It’s always busy almost all day long. Residents in West San Jose and Cupertino rely on Bollinger Rd to commute and drive/pick up kids at schools such as Lynbrook High, Cupertino High, Miller Middle High, Hyde Middle High, Dilworth Elementary School ,Portal Elementary School, and several private pre-schools. Have you seen the heavy traffic on Bollinger Rd. while parents drive kids to school in the morning and pick them up after school in the afternoon, especially in the section in front Hyde Middle School. The lane in front of Hyde Middle School is always blocked because both the only car entrance and exit for Hyde Middle School are on Bollinger Rd. If you reduce Bollinger Rd to only one lane in each direction, cars will have no way to come out of Hyde Middle School and the rest of cars can not enter the school. The traffic will be assured to be jammed during those hours. Please Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design, not only because of our strong concerns about the predictable traffic jams, but also because of the Financial inefficiency of Cupertino City. Bollinger Rd. has an existing bike lane, so Cupertino City has no need to waste additional funds on extending the bike lanes and reducing the car lanes currently. Please put my comments into the public record. Your reconsideration will be truly appreciated. Grace Lin Resident of West San Jose Phone # 408-725-0169 From:Hu Eva To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:02:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council Members, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed plan to convert two lanes into bike lanes. As a frequent user of Bollinger Road, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact of this decision on commute times and overall traffic flow. Bollinger is already notorious for its congestion, and reducing it to two lanes could exacerbate this issue significantly. While promoting cycling infrastructure is undoubtedly important for promoting sustainable transportation options, it's crucial to consider the existing traffic patterns and the needs of all road users. I urge the City Council to reconsider this proposal and explore alternative solutions that prioritize both the safety of cyclists and the efficiency of traffic flow on Bollinger. I appreciate your attention to this matter and respectfully request that you carefully evaluate the potential consequences of the proposed changes before moving forward. Please put my comments into the public record. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Eva From:Hui Zhou To:City Council Subject:Opposition to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:49:11 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertinor City Council, My name is Hui Zhou, and I live at Blaney Avenue near Bollinger Road. I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the proposed Bollinger Road Corridor Design. As a member of the Bollinger community, I am familiar with each school and each store along on the both sides of Bolligner Road. This road is not a bypass for us, it is one part of the residents' daily life. If Bollinger has been changed to single way, that will be a disaster for all of us, and it will has negative consequences and safety issues for the community. Please be responsible for the community, and to solve the real issues. Don't waste the time and money to such a project that can't benefit the community. Please keep my email to the council meet. Thank you! Best, Hui Zhou -- Stay safe and healthy! Hui Zhou From:j s To:City Clerk Subject:Concerns Regarding the Proposed Reduction of Lanes on Bollinger Road Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:36:42 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Begin forwarded message: From: j s <jun.chemistry@gmail.com> Date: March 18, 2024 at 9:26:21 PM PDT To: citycouncil@cupertino.org Subject: Concerns Regarding the Proposed Reduction of Lanes on Bollinger Road Dear Cupertino city council I am writing to express my concerns and objections about the recent proposal to reduce the number of lanes on Bollinger from four to two. As a resident within 1 mile, I believe this change could have unintended negative consequences. Firstly, the current four-lane structure of Bollinger is already very busy during school and work hours. Reducing it to two lanes could lead to significant congestion. Secondly, I am concerned about the safety implications. More congestion often leads to increased frustration among drivers, which can result in reckless driving behaviors. This put many students pedestrians in danger. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I, along with many other concerned residents, eagerly await your response and hope for a reconsideration of the proposal. Jun From:j s To:City Council Subject:Concerns Regarding the Proposed Reduction of Lanes on Bollinger Road Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:26:26 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino city council I am writing to express my concerns and objections about the recent proposal to reduce the number of lanes on Bollinger from four to two. As a resident within 1 mile, I believe this change could have unintended negative consequences. Firstly, the current four-lane structure of Bollinger is already very busy during school and work hours. Reducing it to two lanes could lead to significant congestion. Secondly, I am concerned about the safety implications. More congestion often leads to increased frustration among drivers, which can result in reckless driving behaviors. This put many students pedestrians in danger. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I, along with many other concerned residents, eagerly await your response and hope for a reconsideration of the proposal. Jun From:J Shearin To:City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk Subject:Please support the CIP item for Bollinger Road traffic analysis and design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:38:14 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honored City Councilmembers and Mayor Mohan, I write today as a resident of Cupertino who lives ¼ mile north of Bollinger Avenue. I not only drive on it to get to places such as Home Depot, but I also bike to Trader Joes on the corner of Bolllinger and De Anza frequently or walk to Safeway on the corner of Bollinger and Miller. When I bike, I try not to be on Bollinger if at all possible. There’s too many dangers, whether from speeding cars, being doored when riding next to parked cars, or a difficult and scary road crossing, like I do when I go to Trader Joe’s. I tend to use residential streets, often going significantly out of my way just to avoid it. I’m also very familiar with the Local Road Safety Plan that highlighted its many safety issues for all methods of transportation, and even the recently released draft of Vision Zero lists it as a top concern and Recommended Project. In short, it’s a road that has many issues for all road users. I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road Traffic Analysis and design work to reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and that this area has documented safety issues, including two recent pedestrian fatalities. You have received a lot of emails, many from community members not in Cupertino, who have raised fears about reduced traffic flow. This CIP item does not change the lane structure or provide funding for any new construction. Rather, it pays to investigate the demand on the road and design what could potentially happen. The City Council will later decide whether we proceed or not with the recommended design changes. This project has a modest outlay for the support of improving safety in our city. We have received 80% of the money for the analysis and design, leveraging our city resources well. This CIP item is a reasonable outlay for the potential benefits and I urge you to support it. Thank you for considering my input, and your work on behalf of Cupertino. Best Wishes, Jennifer Shearin ----------------------------------- This message is from my personal email account. I am only writing as myself, not as a representative or spokesperson for any other organization. From:James Li To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:04:38 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi there, Hope you are well! Today I read over the news that there’s a proposal on Bollinger Road to be discussed tomorrow 3/19. I find the proposal shocking - making the street single lane will apparently make the traffic much worse on this already super busy road, negatively impacting hundreds of residents living nearby like myself. Further, as a tax payer, I am also shocked to hear that the city is pouring budget into this expensive project which makes the traffic worse not better, over other priorities that we, the residents, would actually benefit from. This is insane. Please put my comments into the public record. As a resident nearby I strongly oppose this proposal and request your consideration to delay the funding. Best regards, James From:Jane Y To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Please delay the funds allocation for Bollinger Road project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:28:15 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino Councilmembers, I am a resident of west San Jose, living close to Bollinger Road. Though we are not Cupertino residents, your meeting agenda regarding the Bollinger Road made us worried. Many west San Jose residents drive on Bollinger Road everyday. We know the traffic situation very well. There was traffic congestion almost every morning and late afternoon during weekdays. If Bollinger Road has only one lane in each direction, I am afraid our west San Jose people can't find an alternative road to go to work or drive kids to schools. Moreover, we saw cars from Santa Clara or Strawberry Park district to Hyde Middle School everyday. If Bollinger Road turned into a single lane road, all these cars would get stuck on the road and block Cupertino traffic. That would hurt Cupertino residents' daily life, too. We really hope Cupertino Council can delay the funds allocation to Bollinger Road Design. More community outreach should be done before making such a decision. Thank you for considering our concerns! Please put my email in the public record. Sincerely, Jane Y. From:Jeanne Gu To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Bollinger road corridor design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:49:23 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City of Cupertino, Please postpone the plan to allocate funds for the Bollinger Rd. corridor design. This plan will exacerbate the already congested Bollinger Rd., adversely affecting the commuting experience for residents in the neighborhood. Whoever proposed this design plan lacks vision for city planning and demonstrates a disregard for the residents living between Bollinger Rd. and Stevens Creek Blvd. Please halt the corridor plan and solicit more feedback from neighborhood residents. You have my permission to put my email into the public record regarding the 'Funds allocation to the Bollinger road corridor design' project. Thanks, Jeanne From:Jeff Irwin To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support for the Bollinger Road Study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:13:33 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I'm emailing today to support the Bollinger Road study. I cycle with my kids to Miller Middle and Lynbrook High schools, and face two primary issues between Blaney Ave and Miller Rd: on the south side, where Bolling Rd curves, cars will cut through the bicycle lane (even with us in it!), and the north-side bike lane shared with parking is often partially blocked by cars, sometimes forcing a dangerous merge with 40+ mph traffic. It's worthwhile to understand what options we have to enable more people to get to and from school and work without driving more cars. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino, -Jeff Irwin 10193 Toni Ct Cupertino, CA From:Jennifer Griffin To:City Council; City Clerk Cc:grenna5000@yahoo.com Subject:City Council CIP Study Session, March 19, 2024 Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:16:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council: Please include this as Public Comment for the CIP Study Session for the City Council Meeting on 3/19/24. I am very concerned people are trying to have Bollinger Road be only two lanes instead of the current Four lanes. Bollinger Road is a major East/West Traffic Corridor between Lawrence Expressway in San Jose/Cupertino and De Anza Blvd. in Cupertino. The North side of Bollinger Road lies in Cupertino and the West side of Bollinger Road in West San Jose. There is too much traffic on Bollinger Road to only have there be two lanes of traffic. The back up On the road would be astronomical and gridlock would be the result. The school drop-offs at Hyde Middle School is already a gridlock situation. My mother-in-law and her family live by Bollinger in West San Jose, and they have said that reducing Bollinger to two lanes is a very dangerous idea. Emergency vehicles would not be Able to get down Bollinger with only two lanes. Before anyone is seriously considering doing this to Bollinger, there needs to be many more Meetings. This roadway is shared by San Jose and Cupertino and is a major traffic corridor for Traffic from other cities. Bollinger needs to be studied further and retaining all four lanes on Bollinger is the best Course of action. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Jennifer Griffin From:Jenny Zhao To:City Council Subject:Please do NOT change Bollinger to single lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 7:45:30 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor and City Council, My home is very closet to Bollinger. In the past 20 years, I've witnessed Bollinger become more and more busy. In the rush hours, I can hardly drive on to Bollinger from my home. Changing it to single lane will be a disaster, especially to those parents who send kids to Hyde and don't want kids to be late ------ this could cause accident and life! San Jose and Fremont did the same thing in several places, it turns out to be ugly, cause more congestions and waste money. The budget can be used to improve other city services. Please reject this item. Thank you! Jenny Zhao From:Jingchun Zhang To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Against lane reduction at Bollinger Rd Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:45:58 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I am a resident near Bollinger Rd. I am against the proposal to reduce lanes for 4 lanes to 2 lanes at Bollinger Rd. The morning time traffic is very heavy at Bollinger. It will be worse with fewer lanes. Please consider other ways to improve safety instead fewer lanes. Thanks Jingchun From:Joel Wolf To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Road Corridor Design Project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:35:27 PM Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and Council Members, I am writing in regard to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design project. I strongly support moving forward on this project and elevating the CIP priority status from low to high. This corridor has seen two pedestrian fatalities and one severe injury in the ten-year period from 2012- 2022. In this time period there have been a total of 42 injury collisions. This corridor has been identified as part of the High Injury Network in the 2024 Cupertino Vision Zero Draft plan that was recently issued. It is also one of the plan’s top 7 recommended projects for safety improvements. This corridor has also been identified as in need of safety improvements in Cupertino’s 2023 Local Road Safety Program. The 2018 Cupertino Pedestrian plan identifies this corridor as part of the High Injury Network based on data from 2005 to 2014. I urge the Council to include this project in the 2024-2025 CIP and 5-year plan, and to elevate its status to high. Thank you for your consideration. Joel Wolf Vice-Chair Bike-Ped Commission Joel Wolf Bicycle and Pedestrian Commissioner JWolf@cupertino.gov From:John G To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:13:44 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honorable Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, Today I urge you to support the Bollinger Road Design and Traffic Analysis CIP item . The need is proven. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. There is funding. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. This CIP item is to perform a traffic study, and then make a design using that information. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. To clarify, this CIP item does not approve any construction changes on Bollinger. It is only a step toward analyzing and deciding what we as a city want to do to address the safety concerns. This is a great way to improve safety and traffic issues. Please keep this item on the CIP list. Thank you, John Geis Cupertino Resident 408-209-6970 mobile jgeis4401@gmail.com From:juan ren To:City Council Subject:Disagree about change Bollinger road to single lane Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:48:36 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am resident nearby Bollinger road, this road is very very very busy after 4:30pm everyday currently ; I don’t know why somebody propose the single lane suggestion and you guys even consider this bad proposal? Why why why? CU always said they have no money , so they closed two schools last year, now you guys want to spent more money to make the traffic more worse??? Where is the money coming from? CU hope more Bd more people move out of the town ??? I am angry to hear this proposal , please do NOT do it! Thanks, Juan From:Julia Zhao To:City Council; City Clerk Cc:Julia Zhao Subject:Please Postpone the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:35:14 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear council members, I am the parent of a Hyde middle school student. I am writing to urge you to postpone the allocation of funds to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Bollinger is a very busy road, especially during morning and afternoon hours when students from Hyde, Miler, Lynbrook are commuting. Converting Bollinger from two lanes to a single lane for cars will cause complete congestion, raising significant safety concerns for students of Hyde, Miller, and Lynbrook, as well as for neighborhood residents. Thank you! Best regards, -- Julia Zhao From:Julie L. To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:34:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. Both of my sons attended Hyde Middle School, so I saw first hand the safety issues on Bollinger. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sincerely, Julie Lin Resident in the attendance area of Hyde Middle & Cupertino High Schools From:Junqing Wu To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Please postpone the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:03:36 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi there, My name is Junqing Wu, a US citizen living in Cupertino for more than 15 years. Recently I learned that cupertino is planning to change Bolliger road to one lane in each direction. I am writing to let you know that I am totally against it and we should stop this planning right away. The Bolliger road is a busy road with many schools around. Changing it to one lane will increase the traffic significantly. It will stress people out and cause more accidents. It will put both the car driver and cyclists in danger. Thank you for your attention to this matter! Junqing From:Kent Vincent To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Rd Safety Study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:37:35 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. All, Please reject the option to reduce Bollinger Road to two lanes. Bollinger simply has too much traffic, independent of people turning, to consider further restricting its traffic flow. We got to see what Bollinger looks like with only two lanes during the recent creek construction project, slow, bumper-to-bumper traffic both directions, which makes turning left even from a left turn only lane more difficult. Kent Vincent From:Kerry Xiangke Liu To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Delay Bollinger Road project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:07:05 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am a Cupertino Resident. There is already heavy traffic on Bollinger road during rush hours. Please delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road corridor design. Please put my comments into public record. Thanks, Kerry From:Kitty Moore To:City Clerk; Kirsten Squarcia; Lauren Sapudar Subject:Written Communications Item 1 CIP Special Meeting and also Item Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:50:25 PM Attachments:City Hall Seismic Costs and Need.pdf Dear City Clerk, Please include the attachment for the CIP item 1, Special City Council Meeting March 19, 2024. The City has been aware of the seismic deficiencies at City Hall for nearly 20 years without implementing a seismic retrofit. Is this wise? Thank you, Kitty Moore Kitty Moore Councilmember City Council KMoore@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1389 March 19, 2024 Written Communications City Properties: City Hall Renovation •The City Hall Subcommittee assigned by Council in 2022, consisted of Councilmember Jon Willey and Councilmember Kitty Moore. The first meeting coordinated with Staff, in particular the CIP Manager and Public Works Director, was held August 2, 2022, the building was toured, need for the project discussed, and future topics and scheduling were planned as reflected in the presentation slides provided by Staff. There is also a vast amount of support documents online. •Staff voiced concerns about their safety at City Hall to the Civil Grand Jury in the December 19, 2022 report "House Divided." That report stated: "Certain staff regard the present City Council’s unwillingness to fund the renovation as confirmation that their health and safety concerns are not a priority." •During the course of the multi-session meetings of the Subcommittee, Staff determined that moving the EOC to the new Torre Avenue City Hall Annex building would be an excellent idea, and that project had been moving forward to locate 1,300 sf of EOC in that building. •The following slides show the Staff Recommendation to the City Hall Subcommittee to renovate the City Hall and a table of more affordable options to address seismic safety concerns. -Councilmember Moore Release date here Page 0 of 51 h A HOUSE DIVIDED: CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL AND CITY STAFF 2022 Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury December 19, 2022 Page 8 of 51 REPORT TITLE A HOUSE DIVIDED (...)"City staff voiced concern that their workplace, City Hall, had not been renovated and seismically improved. Although the 2015 City Council allocated funds for the renovation, the monies were subsequently redirected to expand the City Library. Certain staff regard the present City Council’s unwillingness to fund the renovation as confirmation that their health and safety concerns are not a priority." Meeting #5 - 10/21/2022 Topic: Funding & Summaries City Hall Subcommittee We recommend proceeding with the following projects: •Full Renovation of City Hall building (Seismic, HVAC, IT, Interiors, etc.), budgeting $26M. Consider upgrading to “Essential Facility” standards ($4M). Hire consultants to perform workplace planning (to confirm growth projections), and cost analysis. •Add parking behind Community Hall, budgeting $350,000 (scope and budget to be confirmed, will be part of existing Civic Center Parking project) •As part of CIP Program discussions for FY23-24, consider hiring Consultants to develop schedule and requirements for City Hall demobilization/mobilization strategy and communications. CIP Program Strategy •CDTFA Audit •Potential for substantial short-and long-term impacts •Ability to fund additional CIP Projects •Use of fund balance above the unassigned amounts require a 3-year payback plan both for General and Capital Funds •Capital Reserve has a min $5M reserve Other Considerations Element Area SF Cost / SF Total Direct Construction Soft Costs +25% 2023 Project Total (+25% soft costs) Cost per stall 2024 Project Total (5% escalation) 2025 Project Total (5% escalation) City Hall Renovation - Seismic Only, Non-Essential Facility 24,140 $216 $5,205,308 $1,301,327 $6,506,635 N.A.$6,831,967 $7,173,565 City Hall Renovation - Seismic Only, Essential Facility 24,140 $232 $5,606,032 $1,401,508 $7,007,540 N.A.$7,357,917 $7,725,813 City Hall Renovation - Seismic, MEP/IT, Interior gut, Non-Essential Facility 24,140 $807 $19,491,360 $4,872,840 $24,364,200 N.A.$25,582,410 $26,861,531 City Hall Renovation - Seismic, MEP/IT, Interior gut, Essential Facility 24,140 $868 $20,955,693 $5,238,923 $26,194,616 N.A.$27,504,347 $28,879,564 City Hall Replacement, Non-Essential Facility 24,140 $804 $19,400,111 $4,850,028 $24,250,139 N.A.$25,462,646 $26,735,778 City Hall Replacement, Essential Facility 24,140 $908 $21,921,534 $5,480,384 $27,401,918 N.A.$28,772,013 $30,210,614 City Hall Replacement w/ Added Floor, Non- Essential Facility 36,140 $809 $29,237,621 $7,309,405 $36,547,027 N.A.$38,374,378 $40,293,097 City Hall Replacement w/ Added Floor, Essential Facility 36,140 $914 $33,017,504 $8,254,376 $41,271,880 N.A.$43,335,474 $45,502,248 City Hall Replacement w/ Added Floor + 100 spaces Underground parking, Non-Essential Facility 70,140 $529 $37,071,561 $9,267,890 $46,339,451 $463,395 $48,656,424 $51,089,245 City Hall Replacement w/ Added Floor + 100 spaces Underground parking, Essential Facility 70,140 $582 $40,851,444 $10,212,861 $51,064,305 $510,643 $53,617,520 $56,298,396 Underground Parking (36 Stalls) below City Hall Replacement, Essential Facility (parking only) 12,070 $230 $2,781,049 $695,262 $3,476,311 $96,564 $3,650,126 $3,832,633 City Hall Replacement w/ Added Floor + 100 spaces Underground parking, Essential Facility (parking only) 34,000 $230 $7,833,940 $1,958,485 $9,792,425 $97,924 $10,282,046 $10,796,149 2022+ Cost Estimates From:Koray Oner To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:53:21 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sent from my iPhone From:kristen chen To:City Clerk Subject:Reduce Bollinger Road to Single Lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:06:48 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern, My name is Kristen Chen. I am writing to you in regards to Bollinger Road changing to a single lane. For the fifteen years of living on Bollinger Road, I’ve seen how busy this road has been used. There are cars, trucks, buses constantly driving by. The number of cyclists, however, can be counted on weekdays. As more people return to work, traffic on Bollinger Road will get even worse during commute hours. If you cut down to one lane, I can foresee there will be more road rage too with impatient drivers. I have reason to believe this because I (and my neighbors) often got honked at by people when I waited to make a left turn onto my driveway. Before Covid, traffic was bad with two lanes. It was so congested during commute times that, when I picked up my hungry kids from after school, we had to wait over 20 minutes to move less than a 1/4 mile on Bollinger Road. We could see our house right there, but we could not get home! Now that Covid is over, I start to see traffic is picking up again, especially in the morning and evening rush hours. Again, from my personal experiences, in the morning when I take my child to school these days , with the constant stream of traffic on both lanes, I often have to wait for 15 minutes or more to back out of the driveway . A few times, we could not get out, I had to tell my child to get off the car and run to school so that he did not miss class. Bollinger Road is already heavily used daily with two lanes. If you cut down to one lane on each direction, the traffic congestion will become a nightmare! Sincerely, Kristen Chen From:kristen chen To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Road Changes to Single Lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:40:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council Members, My name is Kristen Chen. I am writing to you in regards to Bollinger Road changing to a single lane. For the fifteen years of living on Bollinger Road, I’ve seen how busy this road has been used. There are cars, trucks, buses constantly driving by. The number of cyclists, however, can be counted on weekdays. As more people return to work, traffic on Bollinger Road will get even worse during commute hours. If you cut down to one lane, I can foresee there will be more road rage with impatient drivers. I have reason to believe this because I (and my neighbors) often got honked at by people when I waited to make a left turn onto my driveway. Before Covid, traffic was bad with two lanes. It was so congested during commute times that, when I picked up my hungry kids from after school, we had to wait over 20 minutes to move less than a 1/4 mile on Bollinger Road. We could see our house right there, but we could not get home! Now that Covid is over, I start to see traffic is picking up again, especially in the morning and evening rush hours. Again, from my personal experiences, in the morning when I take my child to school these days , with the constant stream of traffic on both lanes, I often have to wait for 15 minutes or more to back out of the driveway . A few times, we could not get out, I had to tell my child to get off the car and run to school so that he did not miss class. Bollinger Road is already heavily used daily with two lanes. If you cut down to one lane on each direction, the traffic congestion will become a nightmare! Sincerely, Kristen Chen From:L L To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Regarding Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:23:34 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, I saw the proposal to change Bollinger Rd to 1 lane road. This sounds like an absurd proposal from someone do not live in the area, or do not need to comminute to work. Please consider the hardworking people who pay you all the tax in the area, who also need to commute daily on this road. Changing it to a 1 lane road will not only be a disaster to the traffic, but also create more pollution because of the traffic jam. Regards, Lin From:Larry Dean To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Prioritizing the Bollinger road Improvements Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:37:21 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan and fellow Council members – I urge you to keep the Bollinger Road improvement project as a top priority of your budget this year. Like a number of roads and byways in Cupertino, Bollinger Road is a busy commuter road that bisects neighborhoods and inhibits the community from easily moving from one section of town to another via bike or pedestrian means. Surprisingly there seems to be resistance to this project which is very hard to understand. As a longtime resident of Cupertino, I urge you to keep the focus and priorities on making it safe and easy for the community to navigate their way through the city. Thank you for your service to our community! Larry Dean 22159 Rae Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 From:Lars Thomsen To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:12:40 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, Lars here from Trail Head Cyclery, the last remaining bike shop in Cupertino. Folks, Cupertino residents and employees alike need this study to further the goals for safer routes. My employee who lives off Bollinger tries to commute by bicycle as often as possible and currently avoids Bollinger due to the risks! I really hope to see Cupertino take full advantage of the state grant dollars and reap the rewards of this traffic study as I really do not believe that San Jose ever will. Ride on, Lars ____/\__/\_/\__/\_____ Lars Thomsen \ O_]\º Captain \_ O Trail Head Cyclery \ www.trailheadcyclery.com \ 408-369-9666 \ lars@trailheadcyclery.com | On the job: Tue-Sat. \ On the trails: Sun-Mon \ From:Laurie Dean To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:39:02 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sent from my iPad From:Lili Zhou To:City Clerk Cc:City Council Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:26:13 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Please do not do the funds allocation to Bollinger Road Corridor Design. It already has so much traffic. Best Regards, From:Lisa Gao To:City Council Subject:Please don"t fund of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 10:35:51 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Council of Cupertino City, Please don't fund of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. The current traffic on Bollinger Road is already crowed in the traffic time. I don't think it is a good idea to change it into one lane road. Please put my comments into the public record. Regards, Lisa Gao From:Lisa rental info To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Please do NOT make bollinger road into single lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:07:28 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. It is already crowded. Thank you. From:Long Jiao To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Don"t include Bollinger Road Corridor Design in CIP Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 11:22:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council, Please include this email as written communication for the 3/19/2024 City Council Special Meeting. We are in a budget deficit. Please don't make unnecessary spendings. Bollinger Road Corridor Design is a low priority. We don't need it when we are looking for budget deductions. According to Bollinger Road Corridor Safety Study, there are two alternatives. I never heard about any survey about those two alternatives. Alternative A is a lane reduction. There was road repair recently so the east bound became one lane on that day. The traffic was horrible. You don't want to make it permanent. Thanks, Long From:Long Jiao To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Cupertino Voice Survey Results for Service-Level Reductions Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:22:14 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council, Please include this email as written communication for the City Council meeting on 3/19/2024. Cupertino Voice is a group of Cupertino residents who care passionately about our community and the welfare of our city. We performed many surveys related to Cupertino issues. Please see https://cupertinovoice.org/?page_id=13 for a full list. In February 2024, we performed a survey about the Service-Level Reductions weighed by the City Council. The survey was sent to about 15,000 registered Cupertino voters and people who subscribed to our surveys. We received 275 total responses, including 231 responses from registered Cupertino voters. Given there are a little more than 33,000 registered voters in Cupertino, the margin of error is ±6.4% with 95% confidence level. The conclusion is people rejected following items: 1. Shift Sidewalk Maintenance to Property Owners 2. Shift Street Tree Maintenance to Property Owners 3. Reduce Janitorial Contract. Please see https://cupertinovoice.org/?p=132 for detailed results. Sincerely, Long Jiao on behalf of Cupertino Voice From:Louise Yueh-Lu Wang To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Bollinger Road Study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:45:39 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am writing to express my view on the Bollinger Road Study. I am NOT in support of Plan A, which reduces the lanes from 4 to 2. As an almost daily driver on Bollinger, I can tell that the increased congestion will make it intolerable, and the #1 accident type in the City's analysis (Rear-end collision) will only increase. Thank you -Louise Wang resident of Cupertino on Bret Ave From:Mandy C To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Re: NO to changing Bollinger to single-lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:51:48 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Add the correct city clerk email address.. To whom may concerned, I heard that City is thinking about changing Bollinger to single-lane. I am writing a letter to show I am really against it! First of all, Bollinger Road connects two big main streets, De Anza Blvd and Lawrence. It is not just a simple residential road, but a very busy road, especially in the morning and at night. I drive this road every morning and night. It is very packed. And especially it has lots of parts that cars need to turn left, which has already made the left lane always build up traffic all the time. I can't imagine how terrible the traffic is going to be if you change it to a single lane. Second of all, I drove around 1.5 miles on Bollinger at 9am this morning, I purposely looked on the way this morning. I didn't see one single bike at all, but just cars. My husband loves to ride bikes, he sometimes bikes to work in the morning, there are so many ways/roads to bike including Bollinger already. Please, do some more research on how many people always bike to work every day in this neighborhood.... vs how many people in the neighborhood drive to work every day.. So, I object to changing Bollinger to single-lane! Thanks, Mandy On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:47 PM Mandy C <mandycu87@gmail.com> wrote: To whom may concerned, I heard that City is thinking about changing Bollinger to single-lane. I am writing a letter to show I am really against it! First of all, Bollinger Road connects two big main streets, De Anza Blvd and Lawrence. It is not just a simple residential road, but a very busy road, especially in the morning and at night. I drive this road every morning and night. It is very packed. And especially it has lots of parts that cars need to turn left, which has already made the left lane always build up traffic all the time. I can't imagine how terrible the traffic is going to be if you change it to a single lane. Second of all, I drove around 1.5 miles on Bollinger at 9am this morning, I purposely looked on the way this morning. I didn't see one single bike at all, but just cars. My husband loves to ride bikes, he sometimes bikes to work in the morning, there are so many ways/roads to bike including Bollinger already. Please, do some more research on how many people always bike to work every day in this neighborhood.... vs how many people in the neighborhood drive to work every day.. So, I object to changing Bollinger to single-lane! Thanks, Mandy From:Marc Majewski To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Bollinger Rd Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:53:41 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've lived 1 block off of Bollinger Rd for 36 years. Given the amount of traffic it carries, reducing it to two lanes is beyond stupid and will cause gridlock and delays. Who comes up with this nonsense? That said, the intersection of Bollinger and DeAnza is unsafe and should be improved in the opinion of this former Cupertino Safety Commissioner and Certified Safety Professional with 39 years of professional practice. From:Matt Widmann To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:CIP prioritization for Bollinger Rd. traffic study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:40:33 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, The CIP should include a traffic study for Bollinger Rd. This is a very important east-west corridor for active transportation, similar to McClellan Rd. (which now benefits from a physically separated bikeway). I'm worried that, like Homestead Rd., just because Bollinger straddles a city border it is not receiving the attention and safety improvements it may need. Please get the ball rolling on making the road safer by conducting a traffic study to gauge how much the road is being used. Keep in mind that there's already a grant available if Cupertino can contribute 20% to match. Thank you for your consideration. – Matt From:mel ni To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Bollinger Road Safety Study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:29:43 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am writing to express my view on the Bollinger Road Study. I am NOT in support of Plan A, which reduces the lanes from 4 to 2. As an almost daily driver on Bollinger, I can tell that the increased congestion will make it intolerable, and the #1 accident type in the City's analysis (Rear-end collision) will only increase. Thank you -mel ni resident of Cupertino on Bret Ave From:Michael Chen To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:40:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, Please support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. I live near the Bollinger Home Depot and have wanted to see a safer Bollinger Road for a very long time. As a child in the 90’s, I would bike up and down Bollinger but only on the sidewalk as the bike lanes seemed completely inadequate. Now as an adult with decades of experience cycling, I sometimes will bike down Bollinger but only if absolutely necessary. The bike lanes are still inadequate - a tiny strip that is flanked by parked cars on the right and 40+mph cars on the left. Often times there is broken glass or some other obstacle that forces me into the street. Add in the fact that modern cars are becoming bigger, heavier, and deadlier for pedestrians, and you can understand why biking down Bollinger is a true life or death situation. I have seen that there is a contingent of community members that wants to shut the study down because they think it will result in lane closures and thus more traffic. I have interacted with these folks and behind all the talk of traffic and metrics it becomes clear that their main priority isn’t actually living in the city of Cupertino. It seems their main priority is to maximize the amount of cars that pass through Cupertino. As a resident, I want to live in my city, not just drive through it. I have lived in cities where walking or biking is a safe and viable option for getting to school, to work, or just to a local restaurant. The key design feature these places have is limited exposure to high-speed cars. If you haven’t already, please acquaint yourselves with the concept of induced demand, as explained in this Wired article: https://www.wired.com/2014/06/wuwt-traffic-induced- demand/ The gist is that adding more lanes and car capacity doesn’t reduce traffic, it only incentivizes more people to get in their cars and use the roads. As that happens, the roads become less safe and other option become less viable. Eventually, the car is the only safe option. I have also lived in places that thought adding lanes was the solution to traffic. In these places, the only parts of your city you will ever see are your driveway and various parking lots. I would like to see Cupertino go in the opposite direction. More walkable, more bikeable, and more safe. A better Bollinger Road would be a good step in that direction. Please support the Bollinger Road Study. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sincerely, Michael Chen From:Ming To:City Council Subject:Concern for brollinger road change Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 8:51:41 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Cupertino City council, I just heard there will be a proposal to change current brollinger road to be one lane only and convert the other lane to bicycle lane. I am really concerned and wonder if this plan has been seriously studied. I live near by and current traffic is already bad during peak hours. Can’t image how horrible this gonna be once it has only one lane! I hope city council could make more realistic suggestions and am really against the current proposal to convert brollinger to be single lane only. Thanks, Ming From:MK Liao To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Pls DELAY the funding of Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:31:31 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it concerns, PLEASE DELAY the funding of Bollinger Road Corridor Design. PLEASE postpoint the funds allocation ot the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. I do not want my street TANTAU ave to be a very busy traffic street since there is a lot of walking home kids. Please put my email comments into the PUBLIC record. From the residents of Cupertino, the Liao family. Thanks. From:MK Liao To:City Council Subject:Pls DELAY the funding of Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:29:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it concerns, PLEASE DELAY the funding of Bollinger Road Corridor Design. PLEASE postpoint the funds allocation ot the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. I do not want my street TANTAU ave to be a very busy traffic street since there is a lot of walking home kids. Please put my comments into the PUBLIC record. From the residents of Cupertino, the Liao family. Thanks. From:Mowen To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Letter to Oppose Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:38:29 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council Members or to Whom it may concern, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bollinger Road Corridor Design to shrink the car lane from 2 to 1. We live in the Lynbrook High School district. Bollinger Road is the closest big road to our house for daily commute. But this proposed Bollinger Road Corridor Design would greatly increase the traffic congestion, and it would have a devastating impact on our community. The Bollinger road is located in the heart of our community, connecting many popular schools in our community, for example, Lynbrook High School, Hyde Middle School, Miller Middle School, Dilworth Elementary School and Murdock Elementary School. These schools serve a big population of Cupertino and West San Jose residences. Every morning and early afternoon, I see cars waiting in a long line on Bollinger road trying to get in and out of these schools. Now I can use the second lane to go through the traffic, but if you change the bollinger road to a single car lane, we have to stay in the single car lane which promotes higher possibility to car accident and threatens the safety of young kids commute to schools. Bollinger road also connects many supermarkets and restaurants at our community. Single lane will make all the traffic worse based on existing setup. Again, higher risk for car accidents and unsafe walking environments for young and old. Demoted the image of our beautiful and charming community. Moreover, Cupertino City is currently short of funds for many good design proposals, for example, for schools , libraries and parks. Please at least delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design! I urge you to vote against the Bollinger Road Corridor Design in today's meeting! It would be a mistake that we would regret for many years to come. Please put my comments into the public record. Sincerely, Mowen Yang From:nadine brewer To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:bollinger road safety Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:33:55 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Alternative A, reducing Bollinger Road from 4 lanes to 2 lanes (single lane in each direction) I believe it be more beneficial if funding for this project halted and focus on other aspects of improving the city, for example cleaning trash littering the streets and highways from homelessness and careless visitors in town. Bollinger road is a major commuter street that would not benefit if decreased in sized. Alternative B is much better, as it leaves all 4 lanes but improves certain areas along Bollinger, particularly near Hyde middle school, where there are children biking to school. Reducing the lanes on Bollinger would impact the traffic not only along the road to daily commuters but to school traffic as well to Hyde middle school, as its entrance is on Bollinger road, and already is difficult getting in and out of the parking lot. I believe the people who use Bollinger most consistently use vehicles, not bikes, and therefore would be better to focus on fixing whats already there. the time of construction to reduce the lanes will also impact the flow of traffic down Bollinger, causing major slowdowns and frustration. From:Olivia Chen To:City Council Subject:I respectfully oppose the proposal to reduce lanes on Bollinger and Lawrence. Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:13:14 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, My name is Olivia Chen I live in Bentoak lane. San Jose 95129. There are several reasons why I disagree with the proposal to reduce lanes on Bollinger and Lawrence: 1. Traffic congestion: Bollinger and Lawrence are major thoroughfares that experience heavy traffic flow, especially during peak hours. Reducing the number of lanes would likely exacerbate congestion and lead to longer travel times for commuters. This could have significant implications for the overall efficiency of transportation in my area. I normally need to wait for a long time to cut in Bollinger from wonderich road. I can’t imaging how long should I wait to merge to bollinger. Plus there are bunch of car going out from Wunderich in the morning from Murdock elementary school. Reducing lane will make this worse …. 2. Capacity limitations: By reducing the number of lanes, the road's capacity to accommodate vehicles would be diminished. This could result in bottlenecks and increased delays, particularly at intersections and during high-demand periods. Maintaining an adequate number of lanes is crucial for accommodating current and future traffic volumes effectively. 3. Emergency response and public safety: A reduction in lanes could potentially impede emergency vehicles' ability to navigate through the affected area quickly. Quick response times during emergencies can be critical in saving lives and minimizing property damage. It is important to prioritize public safety and ensure unobstructed access for emergency services. In summary, while I understand the need for effective traffic management and improvement of transportation systems, I believe that reducing lanes on Bollinger and Lawrence may not be the most suitable solution. It is essential to consider the potential negative consequences and explore alternative approaches that can achieve the desired goals without compromising traffic flow, public safety, and the well-being of the community. Best regards, Olivia Resident in bollinger and Lawrance From:Peggy Griffin To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Re: 3-19-2024 City Council Agenda Item #1 CIP Plan-Bollinger Rd Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:49:47 PM Attachments:image0.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council, I forgot to include this information from Attachment A below: Sincerely, Peggy Griffin On Mar 18, 2024, at 9:43 PM, Peggy Griffin <griffin@compuserve.com> wrote: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM. Dear City Council, Please do not include Bollinger Rd Corridor work in the CIP Plan for the following reasons: 1-Do not start a completely NEW CIP project when we have many other projects that need to be completed. 2-It has been identified as a LOW PRIORITY project. 3-Although there is a $425k grant, that is ONLY 20% of the cost of the entire project! What you are looking at is to start a $4M project at a time when the city cannot afford it AND it’s not even a high priority project! 4-Bollinger Rd is a key east-west corridor connecting Lawrence Expressway to De Anza Blvd. Congestion on this road is horrible and involves impacts to several school traffic patterns for Hyde Middle School, Miller Middle School, Lynbrook High School, Cupertino High School. The area along Bollinger at Miller, at Tantau, at Lawrence Expressway cannot take anymore congestion! 5-Lawrence Expressway, Miller Ave and De Anza Blvd are key north-south corridors and cannot afford to be backed up even more due to excess congestion caused by Bolinger Rd changes. The city does not need to start new low priority, high cost ($4M) CIP projects when we have so many left to complete. REQUEST: Do not put this on the CIP plan. Sincerely, Peggy Griffin From:Peggy Griffin To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:3-19-2024 City Council Agenda Item #1 CIP Plan-Bollinger Rd Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:44:04 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM. Dear City Council, Please do not include Bollinger Rd Corridor work in the CIP Plan for the following reasons: 1-Do not start a completely NEW CIP project when we have many other projects that need to be completed. 2-It has been identified as a LOW PRIORITY project. 3-Although there is a $425k grant, that is ONLY 20% of the cost of the entire project! What you are looking at is to start a $4M project at a time when the city cannot afford it AND it’s not even a high priority project! 4-Bollinger Rd is a key east-west corridor connecting Lawrence Expressway to De Anza Blvd. Congestion on this road is horrible and involves impacts to several school traffic patterns for Hyde Middle School, Miller Middle School, Lynbrook High School, Cupertino High School. The area along Bollinger at Miller, at Tantau, at Lawrence Expressway cannot take anymore congestion! 5-Lawrence Expressway, Miller Ave and De Anza Blvd are key north-south corridors and cannot afford to be backed up even more due to excess congestion caused by Bolinger Rd changes. The city does not need to start new low priority, high cost ($4M) CIP projects when we have so many left to complete. REQUEST: Do not put this on the CIP plan. Sincerely, Peggy Griffin From:PengXinlin To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Do not change Bollinger Road to single lane Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 10:46:22 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Cupertino city stuff, I am one of the residents live near Bollinger road , I drive through Bollinger road almost everyday, the traffic is very heavy during rush hour, Please don't start the Bollinger Road Corridor Design right away. By the way, please put my email into the public record Thanks, Xiuli Sent from my iPhone From:Pete Klein To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:18:03 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. As a cyclist living in Cupertino, I often ride south and must cross Bollinger to continue my route. I'm always fearful for my safety as the traffic on Bollinger is very fast. The alternative is to use the light at Blaney, which I often do, but Blaney has its own perils for cyclists. I welcome at least a study to see what might be done to improve cyclist and pedestrian safety along Bollinger. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. From:Phil To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:48:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. From:Phoebe Poon To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Against Bollinger Road changes to single lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:32:18 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Sir/Madam, Our city had to stop many convenient and beneficial service projects last year due to a drop in tax revenue. Why are we so anxious to send money to a consulting company to immediately start research on Bollinger's major renovation? Changing to Single Lane is very inconvenient for me. I often have to use two way traffic to commute to get off work and to do shopping. I requested a moratorium on funding for the Bollinger Road renovation project and requested that my letter be placed in the meeting minutes. Thanks, Phoebe Poon From:Phoebe Poon To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Against Bollinger Road changes to single lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:32:17 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Sir/Madam, Our city had to stop many convenient and beneficial service projects last year due to a drop in tax revenue. Why are we so anxious to send money to a consulting company to immediately start research on Bollinger's major renovation? Changing to Single Lane is very inconvenient for me. I often have to use two way traffic to commute to get off work and to do shopping. I requested a moratorium on funding for the Bollinger Road renovation project and requested that my letter be placed in the meeting minutes. Thanks, Phoebe Poon From:Ping Gao To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Concern of Bollinger Road Project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:20:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council, This is Ping, a 17-year Cupertino resident. I live pretty close to Bollinger and I've been closely following Bollinger Road Project discussion. I'm deeply concerned about the "Alternative A: Lane Conversion" option. If we implement this option, it will be a nightmare! It will add more congestion to the already bad traffic on Bollinger. I fully respect and understand the safety of Bikers and pedestrians, as my high schooler kid and I are also bikers. But I have driven along Bollinger almost every day to my work place for 17 years and also to my kid's school for several years and I know clearly how the traffic is like. During morning and afternoon rush hours, Bollinger has a lot of traffic which is undoubtedly true. Other than that, Hyde Middle and Lynbrook High are also very close to Bollinger. So, evern at other times, such as 8 am in the morning or 3 pm in the afternoon, there are also lots and lots of cars on Bollinger to drop off or pick up kids. Bollinger is a gateway for both Cupertino and West SJ residents and there are a large number of households along Bollinger. It is a densely populated area. I can't imagine what it will look like if we reduce 4 lanes to 2 lanes. That will be a disaster to whoever commutes to school and workplaces through Bollinger. It will make Bollinger turn into a big parking lot instead of alleviating traffic. I strongly urge the city council to postpone the allocation of funds to the Bollinger Road project, especially when the city is facing a lot of financial challenges. One last word, I don't think doing more work is really necessary for the city council to show the residents that the city council is actually working on something. If the city council cannot make it better, then please just stop doing anything to make it worse. I really have no complaints if the city councils don't do anything to Bollinger right now. You have already done a good job and I know you are trying to survive the financial hardships. Just don't spend extra money toward Bollinger. This is NOT a top priority for the city. It will be a waste. Thank you very much, Ping From:purple BAO To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:concern for Brollinger Road conversion Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:34:58 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Cupertino City officers, I just heard today there would be a discussion about Brollinger road conversion, changing to single lane and covert the other lane to bicycle lane. I am really against the idea. This proposal is not practical at all. Brollinger road is a major road, not just for city of cupertino but for many commuters and nearby residents. You can check live traffic during peak hours and I have no idea why Cupertino city council was thinking to even reduce lanes. And also how come such non-practical proposal didn't have any public hearing? I am really against this idea. Thank you for your time, Ming From:Qing He To:City Council Subject:Concerns over Bollinger project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:42:34 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I'm a West San Jose resident living in Murdock neighborhood. I just started to learn about Cupertino's plan of changing Bollinger Road to single lane in the name of safety. I'd like to voice my strong concerns over this project. The plan tries to limit the car speed and thus reduce the capacity to "provide more safety to bicycles and pedestrians". But the reality is Bollinger road already has dedicated lanes for bicycles, and bicycle traffic is minor compared to the car traffic. Given how busy Bollinger road already is, doing this will just make it way more congested and hurt the local residents. It looks like this project was only going through very limited public disclosure. I've talked to some local residents, nobody seems to know about it. A lot of people not only share these concerns, they are also shocked by how a project this impactful is running without transparency. This led me to believe this is driven by special interest and not putting the local residents at the top. As a concerned resident, I urge you to: - suspend the execution of the project and bring it to larger public hearings so local residents can voice their thougts and concerns - amend the study by adding traffic impact and mitigation plans. Thank you! Regards From:Rattehalli Sudesh To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:23:52 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Rattehalli Sudesh MD PS: As a long time bike commuter to work, while I worked at Kaiser Santa Clara, I have seen and experienced how crucial this segment of Cupertino is to improve our excellent bike infrastructure. I have also have many, many close calls on this segment. It is so important to establish a bike safe corridor here. Rattehalli Sudesh MD From:Rebecca Yun Lee To:City Council Subject:Against making Bollinger road to become single lane Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:21:40 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am living close to Bollinger road, every day, I need to use it to get on to Lawrence to go to office, during school time, 2 lanes are already crowded and we need to wait long time to get onto Lawrence. My concern is when it is changed to one lane, the waiting line will be even longer. Thank you Rebecca Sent from my iPhone From:Rhoda Fry To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:3/19/2024 comments on CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:46:35 PM Attachments:99-058a Stocklmeir Property - 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. - Phase I Envornmental Site Assessment optimized.pdf Lehigh Snyder Hammond House Cupertino Historical Society.pdf COA_88_2012-09-11 Lease Agreement-Submittal_4.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council, Over the years, we have had numerous studies, but little to show for them. The City has been considering that residents take over maintenance of city sidewalks and city street trees. Until that ask is completely out of the realm of possibility, I urge you to not fund go-nowhere studies. We must not be funding studies that have little chance of being executed in the near future. We must be careful about how we invest our money – even for studies. We should also have a very high-level project-cost estimate before launching into studies. I beg you to defer studying the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. We need to prioritize fixing what we have, rather than building new things. I was shocked to see that we need a new 75 gallon water heater at a cost of $12K. Where did that estimate come from? Has the water heater been maintained and drained every 6 to 12 months? Why are we already looking at replacing the hvac at the relatively new Environmental Education Center at McClellan Ranch? And how did the new boards on the blacksmith shop age so quickly? I only took at look at McClellan Ranch and was quite dismayed by what I saw. We need to protect the large barn, let’s get the wood protected before it rots away. We don’t need high-friction pavement – it looks like this is make-work. Can we use the $356K elsewhere? On PV systems, let’s only put the PV systems where we need it most. $6.3M is too much to spend right now. Perhaps install PV in one location now, such as the library and wait on the rest until we know what is happening with the library. Why does the proposed EV Charging Station cost so much? CDMCatnp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting engineering construction operations One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 May 13, 1999 Bert Viskovich Director, Public Works Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Subject: Transmittal of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA Dear Mr. Viskovich: Enclosed please find two copies of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California subject property). This Phase I ESA assesses the subject property for recognized environmental conditions resulting from current or past uses of the subject property or activities at surrounding properties. If you have any questions or comments, please call us at 925-933-2900. Very Truly Yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. e 2v: XL' Randall T S mith,, P.E. Project Director encl. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California May 12, 1999 CDM Project No. 10886-25977 Prepared by: Andria Pornponi QROFESSIONq F2Reviewedby: 2 22C Rlo. C- 51180 EXP. tri a Randall 0mith, P.E. \ T r CIVk\- OF C P-\- Contents Section 1 Executive Summary .............................................. 1- 1 Section 2 Introduction.................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose ................................................. 2-1 2.2 Description of Work ........................................ 2-1 2.3 Limiting Conditions and Methodolgy Used ...................... 2- 2 Section 3 Property Description ............................................. 3-1 3.1 Location and Legal Description ............................... 3-1 3.2 Property and Vicinity Characteristics ........................... 3-1 3.3 Description of Structures and Other Improvements ............... 3-1 3.4 Current Uses of Property .................................... 3- 2 3.5 Past Uses of Property ...................................... 3- 2 3.6 Current and Past Uses of Adjoining Property .................... 3-3 Section 4 Records Review ................................................. 4-1 4.1 Databases Searched ....................................... 4-1 4.2 Database Search Results ................................... 4-2 4.3 Physical Setting ........................................... 4-8 Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews ................................. 5-1 5.1 Hazardous Substances ..................................... 5-1 5.2 Solid Waste/Non-Hazardous Waste ........................... 5-1 5.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls ................................... 5-1 5.4 Asbestos -Containing Materials ............................... 5-2 5.5 Air Quality ................................................ 5- 2 5. 6 Storage Tanks ............................................ 5- 2 5. 7 Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water .......................... 5-2 5.8 Herbicide and Pesticide Use ................................. 5-3 5. 9 Lead -Based Paint ......................................... 5-3 Section 6 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................. 6-1 Section 7 References, Contacts, and List of Acronyms Used ...................... 7-1 Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Information Reviewed Appendix C ED Report Appendix D Environmental Agency Information Requested and Obtained CDM Camp Dresser & McKee JACU PERTI MPHASE-NTOC. W PD Figure Contents continued) List of Figures Follows Page 3-1 Topographical Relief Map of Cupertino, California ........................... 3-1 3-2 Subject Property Site Plan .............................................. 3-1 4-1 EDR Overview Map ................................................... 4-1 Table List of Tables Follows Page 4-1 EDR Site Inventory .................................................... 4-1 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee JACUPERTI N\PHASE-1\TOC. W PD Section 1 Executive Summary Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) was contracted by the City of Cupertino Public Works Department to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California (referred to as the subject property). The subject property is owned jointly by relatives Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, Ms. Janet Trankle, Ms. Pam Stocklmeir, and Mr. Kurt Stocklmeir. The subject property has been owned by the Stocklmeir family since the early 1900s. The approximately five -acre subject property currently contains two rental residential units and a noncommercial orchard. This Phase I ESA was performed in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard designation E1527-97 with the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions' at the subject property. The results of the Phase I ESA were based upon information provided to CDM by Mr. Alan Stocklmeir (the most knowledgeable of the owners), review of pertinent historical documents, and observations specific to environmental conditions made by CDM during a site walkthrough of the subject property conducted on April 22, 1999. The subject property was assessed for recognized environmental conditions with respect to hazardous substances, solid waste/non-hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos - containing materials, air quality, storage tanks, water, wastewater, storm water, herbicide and pesticide use, and lead-based paint. During the site walkthrough, the subject property appeared to be well maintained. Based on CDM's site walkthrough, interviews, and review of site-specific information, there were no indications that prior or current use of the subject property has resulted in recognized environmental conditions. No evidence was discovered that would indicate that adjacent properties caused recognized environmental conditions at the subject property. However, due to the age of the structures at the subject property it is likely asbestos -containing material (ACM) and lead-based paints were used during construction and any renovations. The existence of friable and/or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. Prior to any renovation or demolition of the buildings at the subject property, CDM recommends a certified asbestos As used in ASTM E1527-97, "recognized environmental condition' means the following: The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicated an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies" (ASTM, 1997). CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-1 JACUPERT[ N\PHASE-I\SEC1. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Section 1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Executive Summary consultant conduct an asbestos survey of the buildings. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop building and one pump house. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead-based paint is minimal. In addition, the subject property served as a commercial orchard until the late 1960s. It is possible, although no evidence was fo-und during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement (i.e., spill during mixing or dilution and over application) of pesticides from uses associated with the orchard may have adversely impacted the subject property. The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. The orchard maintenance that occurs at the subject property could reduce the residual pesticides in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. Prior to any major disturbance of the soil at the subject property, CDM recommends collecting soil samples to determine the extent of impact, if any. Finally, one abandoned well exists at the eastern pump house in the southwest section of the subject property. If the well will no longer be used, CDM recommends properly destroying the well with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District. This Executive Summary is not intended to be read as a stand alone document. The reader should review the detailed information regarding each item in the following sections: Section 3, Property Description; Section 4, Records Review; and Section 5, Site Reconnaissance and Interviews. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-2 JACUPERTIMPHASE-RSEM M Section 2 Introduction This section describes the purpose of the study and presents the scope of work as well as limitations to the investigation. 2.1 Purpose CDM was contracted by the City of Cupertino Public Works Department to perform a Phase I ESA of the subject property located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. 2.2 Description of Work CDM received written authorization to proceed on April 13, 1999 from Mr. Bert Viskovich of the City of Cupertino Public Works Department. Upon authorization to proceed, CDM arranged a site walkthrough of the subject property through Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, one of the owners of the subject property. On April 22,1999, CDM met with Mr. Stocklmeir at the subject property to discuss background information pertinent to the assessment of the subject property. After the meeting, CDM conducted a site walkthrough of the subject property, which consists of six buildings and an orchard of approximately 170 orange, walnut, and apricot trees. Mr. Stocklmeir accompanied CDM during the site walkthrough and provided information regarding the current and historical uses of the subject property. Observations made by CDM were noted and photographs of the subject property were taken during the site walkthrough. Select photographs of the subject property are provided in Appendix A. Appendix B contains information reviewed pertinent to the subject property. In addition, a search of federal, state, and local environmental databases was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The database search report provides information regarding any past or current hazardous waste disposal sites; reported petroleum or hazardous waste releases; listed hazardous waste generation, transportation, storage, or disposal facilities; listed solid waste disposal facilities; report leaking underground storage tanks; or listed underground storage tanks at the subject property and properties in the vicinity of the subject property. A copy of the EDR database report is provided in Appendix C. Cursory observations were made of surrounding properties listed in the EDR database during an drive-through survey of the area. During April 20 through May 5, 1999, various federal, state, and local environmental regulatory agencies were contacted as part of an investigation of the history of the subject property and to determine whether prior use of the subject property has resulted in recognized environmental conditions. Agency personnel were also questioned about the existence of recognized CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 2-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC2. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 2 Introduction environmental conditions in the vicinity of the subject property. Names and affiliations of persons contacted for information for this Phase I ESA and a list of information reviewed are provided in Section 7. Copies of information request letters sent to environmental regulatory agencies and subsequent responses are provided in Appendix D. 2.3 Limiting Conditions and Methodology Used The results of this Phase I ESA are based on interviews with environmental regulatory agency and subject property personnel, a walkthrough of the subject property, and a review of acquired environmental regulatory agency documents and subject property information. The conclusions, therefore, represent CDM's professional opinion based on these aforementioned sources of information. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Cupertino Public Works Department. It is not intended for use by other parties. If evidence of recognized environmental conditions are discovered based on CDM's review of information requested but not as yet provided, CDM will notify the City of Cupertino Public Works Department of these newly discovered issues. Therefore, is supplemental information warrants, CDM reserves the right to change conclusions and recommendations stated in this Phase I ESA. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 2- 2 J:\CUPERT1N\PHASE-RSEC2.WPD Section 3 Property Description 3.1 Location and Legal Description The subject property is located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, in southwest Santa Clara County. Figure 3-1, Topographical Relief Map of Cupertino, California, depicts the location of the subject property with respect to geographical features. The Assessor's parcel map was obtained from the Santa Clara County Assessor's Office. The subject property consists of Assessor's Parcel Number 357-09-053. The deed for this parcel, dated March 28, 1984, was obtained from the Santa Clara County Recorder's Office. Appendix B includes a copy of the parcel map and the deed. According to the deed, the legal description of subject property is as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Stevens Creek Road, as it formerly existed 40 feet wide, with the center line of Stevens Creek; thence in a general Southerly direction along the center line of Stevens Creek ... to a station designated D.S. 5 ... thence leaving the center line of Stevens Creek and running along the Eastery line of Monta Vista Park ... and along the Easterly line of Inspiration Point, Monta Vista ... to a pipe on said Southerly line of Stevens Creek Road; thence along said Southerly line of Stevens Creek Road ... to the point of beginning, containing 4.857 acres of land, more or less, and being a portion of the San Antonio Rancho, and being shown upon that certain map entitled, "Map of a survey made for Adelheid M. Stocklmeir in the San Antonio Ranch", which Map was filed for records in the office of the Recorder of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, on December 29, 1915, in Book "O" of Maps, page 88. 3.2 Property and Vicinity Characteristics The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stevens Creek in Cupertino, California. Stevens Creek borders the subject property on its east and south sides. Blackberry Farm Park, consisting of a golf course and picnic facilities, is located on the east side of the creek, south of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Residential housing is situated north and west of the subject property. A wooden fence lines the western boundary of the subject property, except for a short section that is a closed wrought iron gate. The gate leads to Dean Court, one of the private roadways adjacent to the subject property. Main access to the subject property is provided on the north side by a gravel driveway entering from Stevens Creek Boulevard. 3.3 Description of Structures and Other Improvements Eight structures are located on the subject property: a main residence, studio apartment with an attached garage, a shop building, two open-air garages, and three pump houses. Figure 3-2 presents the layout of the subject property. The main residence, the studio apartment, and the shop CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3-1 JACU P ERTI N\PHASE-I\S EC3. W PD AVE MORTON `- CJASCADELAr.*,, DRIVE 11 'a 0 i OREJ Grant utDALLFS F 7vzv--- -->--- ---- M ont_ r HELENA aliiey1. Sch 0 a EAD 260 perg In S R D*., V % H. 0 232 r rn.,itkr"i Z Mll M 1M.rylc oil nary e kv,/Ay Se L a D C- R l EAF 7 LILJ nbuostation- Jk J, -,, F z i Mw - 4 C ISCREEK RD DE ANZA PER A, V istaMoli COLLEGE r C if Cementceff, 0 CourSd 3 jtD j 15 3 a"i Linco S YCh JLL F 0 FT= A-- VJE pjjf It .enne.dy k, sar a 2' 4GravelPit' ater. 019 Gravel 77 pit ------ 0i -j 1=R ANE north Grave,) Pi F 7' I—BUBrzli1 0 2000= 1:: ftte-. 545 as/ t Feet SP, Y 311 P F P rr) i -ATI OA -- Source: U.S.G.S. 15' Quadrangle - Cupertino, CA 1980 Figure 3-1 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Topographic Relief Map of Cupertino, California xa JaSd CDM Camp Dresser & McKee j MInResidemuse ,--" SepticTankGaragelQ Open -Air l01, and Studio Garages \: S Shop Property Line sidences l ' I I Orchard 1 Area l I I rCf i i Property Line I' I Residences Pump i Houses El EIj // Figure 3- 2 Subject Property Site Plan 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California Cupertino Public Works Department Phase / Environmental Site Assessment Section 3 Site Description and History building are each one-story wooden buildings with concrete foundations (Photographs 1 through 3). The open-air garages have wooden frames with corrugated heavy plastic roofs. The main residence and studio apartment were built in approximately 1900, and the shop building, garages, and pump houses were built around 1950. The pump at the pump house located at the northern end of the property was installed around 1920 Photograph 4). It provides water from Stevens Creek for the garden area near the main residence. Historically, it pumped water for use in irrigating the orchard on the subject property. The pump system consists of a PVC pipe that enters the creek, a pressure tank to hold the creek water, the pump, and garden hoses used for distribution. The western pump house at the southern end of the property pumped creek water for irrigating the orchard (Photograph 5). The pump system consisted of a trap door in the creek bed, a concrete holding pit, and the pump. The holding pit is located in the concrete structure between the western and eastern pump houses. This concrete structure, covered with wooden planks, is separated into two comparments: one for the creek water and one for the groundwater well. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the creek water pump was installed in the 1920s or 1930s. The 8 -foot by 10 -foot pump house is now used for storage space. The pump is operable but has not been used in approximately twenty years. The eastern pump house at the southern end of the subject property houses a pump and equipment for a drinking water well (Photograph 6). The groundwater well is located in the concrete structure between the two pump houses. The well was installed between 1900 to 1905. Mr. Stocklmeir is unaware of the depth of the well; however, Mr. Stocklmeir stated that distribution pipes at least 120 feet long have been pulled out of the well. The well was used as the main drinking water source for the subject property until the property was connected to the City's water lines. The well system consists of pipes inserted to reach the groundwater, the pump, and a concrete pressure tank. The pump is inoperable and has not been used in over 50 years. The 8 -foot by 10 -foot pump house is now used for storage space. 3.4 Current Uses of Property Since 1996, Mr. Stocklmeir has rented out the main residence and the studio apartment. The orchard, consisting of approximately 150 orange trees and 20 walnut and apricot trees, fills the majority of the subject property not occupied by the main residence, pump houses, and other structures (Photographs 7 and 8). The orchard no longer functions as a commercial operation. The oranges are picked every March by volunteers from the Second Harvest Food Bank of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties in San Jose, California. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the extent of current orchard maintenance is discing the orchard surface two to three times a year. 3.5 Past Uses of Property According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the subject property has been owned by the Stocklmeir family since the turn of the century. Mr. Stocklmeir's great grandmother lived at the main residence from 1900 until the mid -1940s. His grandparents then lived at subject property from 1949 to 1996, at which time the main residence and studio apartment were rented out. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3-2 JACUPERTIMPHASE-RSEM M Cupertino Public Works Department Section 3 Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Site Description and History Until the late 1960s, the subject property ran a commercial orchard. The orchard area was primarily walnut trees and customers would come to the property to pick the nuts. A portion of the orchard was leased out for growing flowers. The orchard became economically unfeasible and the commercial business ended in the late 1960s. In the mid-1970s, the majority of the walnut trees were removed and replaced with orange trees. About twenty walnut and apricot trees remain at the northern end of the orchard. 3.6 Current and Past Uses of Adjoining Property The Stocklmeir family owned the land adjacent to the west side of the subject property before the area was developed into residences. That area grew additional walnut trees and was also leased out for flower growing. The Stocklmeir family sold that land in 1976. Aerial photographs, available from Pacific Aerial Surveys, were reviewed. The photographs were from the years 1960, 1968, 1978, and 1988. Appendix B presents copies of these aerial photographs. In the 1960 photograph, the surrounding area was used for agricultural and residential purposes. Orchards occupied the subject property, the adjacent property to the west, and portions of the area east of the subject property which is currently Blackberry Farm Park. The main residence is visible through the vegetation on the subject property. In the 1968 photograph, more of the surrounding area has been converted to residential uses. Orchards occupy the subject property and the adjacent property to the west. The area east of the subject property has been developed into a golf course. In the 1978 photograph, the majority of the surrounding area is residential property. On the subject property, the main residence, shop, garages, and pump hoses are visible. The studio apartment is not visible due to vegetation at the subject property. The northern portion of the orchard area appears to be heavily planted, but the southern half is either open space or lightly planted. Housing has been developed along Scenic Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property to the west. In the 1988 photograph, a few small agricultural areas still exist north and east of the subject property. The surrounding area is residential. At the subject property, all of the current structures are visible. The northern portion of the orchard is planted with large trees, while the southern portion has smaller trees. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3- 3 JACUPERTIMPHASE-ASEC3. WPD Section 4 Records Review A search of environmental regulatory agency databases was conducted by EDR for the subject property and properties in the vicinity of the subject property. The EDR database search was conducted to determine whether documentation exists related to environmental incidents at the subject property or at properties in its vicinity. Table 4-1 presents a summary that lists the database, search distance and number of sites recorded on the database searched. Figure 4-1 presents the location of sites located by the database search in the vicinity of subject property. Appendix C presents the results of the EDR database search. 4.1 Databases Searched The following databases and radii search distances were searched for the subject property: Federal Databases National Priorities List (NPL) and Records of Decision (ROD) - 1 mile; NPL Liens - subject property only; Delisted NPL - subject property only; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permitted Treatment, Storage and Disposal (RCRIS-TSD) facilities - 0.5 mile; RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) - subject property only; Corrective Actions (CORRACTS) - 1 mile; RCRA Registered small or large generators of hazardous waste (RCRIS Small Quantity/Large Quantity) - 0.25 mile; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information CERCLIS) - 0.5 mile; Superfund Consent Decrees (CONSENT) -1 mile; CERCLIS - No Further Response Action Planned Facilities (CERC-NFRAP) - subject property only; Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Activity Database System (PADS) - subject property only; Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) - subject property only; Facility Index System (FINDS) - subject property only; Toxic Release Inventory database (TRIS) - subject property only; Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - subject property only; Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) - subject property only; Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System (HMIRS) - subject property only; State of California, Regional and County Databases Cal -Sites (AWP/CAL-SITES) - 1 mile; California Bond Expenditure Plan (CA BEP) - 1 mile; Proposition 65 (Notify 65) - 1 mile; California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) - 1 mile; CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Table 4-1 EDR Site Inventor MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING ALL SITES TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC359034.1s Page 7 Search Target Distance Total Database Property Miles) 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 1 Plotted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Delisted NPL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RCRIS-TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 AWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cal -Sites 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 Notify 65 1.000 0 0 1 0 NR 1 CHMIRS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cortese 1.000 0 0 1 1 NR 2 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CERC-NFRAP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUST 0.500 0 3 8 NR NR 11 UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CA FID 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HAZNET 0.250 0 4 NR NR NR 4 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CA SLIC 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 CA Bond Exp. Plan 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CA WDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 South Bay Region 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Coal Gas 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC359034.1s Page 7 OVERVIEW MAP - 359034.1 s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. W./ N a M ES T E W :H 0 M Z%1/A j R D 9 / ! 25,0 s S REEK A VD / 8 t- M C, L L'LAN R Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) National Priority List Sites I I Landfill Sites 0 1/4 12 1 Miles Power transmission lines Oil & Gas pipelines Figure 4-1 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone EDR Overview Map TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi 1TY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY #: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 / 122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:39 am Section 4 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews State index of properties with hazardous waste (CORTESE) - 1 mile; Toxic Pits cleanup facilities (TOXIC PITS) -1 mile; CA Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery listing (CA SLIC) - 0.5 mile; State Landfill - 0.5 mile; Registered Underground Storage Tanks (UST) - 0. 5 mile; Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) - subject property only; Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) - 0.5 mile; Waste Management Units (WMUDS/SWAT) — 0. 5 mile; Hazardous Waste Information System (HAZNET) - 0.25 mile; California Facility Index Database (CA FID) - 0.25 mile; California Waste Discharge System (CA WDS) - subject property only. South Bay Site Management System (SOUTH BAY) - subject property only; and In addition, EDR searched former manufactured gas (Coal Gas) sites for a radius search of 1 mile. 4.2 Database Search Results A summary of listed environmental sites within the requested search distance follows. National Priorities List (NPL) Sites The National Priorities List (NPL) is a list of the nation's most serious hazardous waste sites. NPL sites are those sites which the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), under its Superfund program, has determined to be a significant threat to public health. The Records of Decision (ROD) document mandates a permanent remedy at an NPL site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup. The USEPA has the authority to file liens (NPL Liens) against real estate property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. The database searches indicated no NPL and ROD sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. There are no liens against the subject property and the subject property was not on nor deleted from the NPL. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Sites The RCRIS databases contain data compiled for RCRA and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. RCRIS lists sites which treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. RCRA administration action tracking system (RAATS) contains records based on enforcement action issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil suits. Under RCRA, the CORRACTS database contains hazardous waste haulers which are undergoing corrective action. The RCRIS database indicates that no TSD sites are located within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. The subject property is not listed in the RAATS database. The CORRACTS database search indicated one CORRACTS site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Zilog Incorporated is located approximately 0.75 miles southeast of the subject property. Zilog manufactured silicon, semiconductor wafers, and microprocessors, and was listed as a hazardous waste storage facility. Zilog operated three USTs: one for storage of waste solvents CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 2 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review acetone, isopropanol, freon, trichloroethane, xylene, and n -butyl acetate); one for containment of potential solvent spills; and one for containment of potential sulfuric, nitric, and hydrofluoric acid spills (J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates, 1983). J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates concluded no soil degradation had occurred from the operation of the acid spill tank, and no additional analytical testing was necessary for the waste solvent storage and spill containment USTs due to only trace levels (less than 20 micrograms per kilogram) of tetrachloroethane, toulene, and benzene found in soil samples near the other two USTs (J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates, 1983). According to Zilog, those chemicals were not used in their operations. In 1987, the California Department of Health Services (DHS) determined that no contamination resulting from Zilog's operations remained at the site (DHS, 1987). The Zilog site was officially closed by the DHS in 1988 (DHS, 1988). Due to the site closure by DHS, trace levels of contaminants in the soil, and distance from the subject property, it is unlikely that the site has impacted the subject property. RCRA Registered Large and Small Generators (LG GEN, SM GEN) of Hazardous Waste The EPA's RCRA facility database lists facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large Generators (LG GEN) are facilities which generate at least 1,000 kilograms of non -acutely hazardous waste per month while Small Generators SM GEN) produce less per month. No SM GEN or LG GEN sites are located within a 0.25 -mile radius of the subject property. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERCLA) Sites The CERCLA Information System (CERCLIS) supports EPA Headquarters and regions for the management and oversight of the Superfund program. CERCLA sites are either on the NPL or are in screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. CONSENT decrees are major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL sites. CERC- NFRAP sites are those CERCLA sites where no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not serious enough to require NPL consideration. No CERCLIS or CONSENT sites are located within a 0.5 -mile and 1 -mile radius of the subject property, respectively. The subject property was not listed on the CERC-NFRAP database. PCB Activity Database System (PADS) The PADS identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. The PADS database search indicated that the subject property is not a PADS site. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) The ERNS list is a national database used to collect information on reported accidental releases of oil and hazardous substances. Spill reports are made to federal authorities including the EPA, the CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 3 JAC U PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review US Coast Guard, the National Response Center and the Department of Transportation. The ERNS database search indicated that the subject property is not an ERNS site. Facility Index System (FINDS) FINDS contains both facility information and references to other sources that contain more detail. The FINDS database search indicated that the subject property is not a FINDS site. Toxic Release Inventory Database (TRIS) Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act (also known as SARA Title III) of 1986 requires the EPA to establish an inventory of toxic chemicals emissions from certain facilities. Facilities subject to this reporting are required to complete a Toxic Chemical Release Form Form R) for specified chemicals. The TRIS database search indicated that the subject property is not a TRIS site. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) TSCA identifies manufactures and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. The TSCA database search indicated that the subject property is not a TSCA site. Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. The MLTS database search indicated that the subject property is not a MLTS site. Hazardous Materials Information Reporting Systems (HMIRS) The HMIRS database contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to the Department of Transportation. The HMIRS database search indicated that the subject property is not a HMIRS site. California Annual Workplan (AWP) California Department of Toxic Substance Control's Annual Workplan, formerly Bond Expenditure Plan (BEP), identifies known hazardous substance sites targeted for cleanup. The AWP and BEP database search indicated no AWP or BEP sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 4 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review Calsites (CAL -SITES) The CAL -SITES database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties as reported by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC). The CAL -SITES database search indicated one CAL -SITES site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation (KACC) is located just under one mile west of the subject property. In 1987, KACC decontaminated and closed a paint/sludge UST. Oil and grease was found in the surrounding soil at concentrations of 1,100 to 2,600 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). A subsequent investigation found that samples from underlying soils had chromium and lead levels consistent with regional background levels, and purgeable and aromatic hydrocarbons levels below detection limits. One groundwater sample from the site exceeded the Primary Drinking Water Standard for chromium (Exceltech, Inc., 1988). In 1988, a kerosene spill occurred at KACC. Excavated contaminated soil contained high levels of vegetable oil. Subsequent analysis of samples from the area of the release indicated vegetable oil in the soil samples at concentrations from 19 to 24 mg/kg, and in a groundwater sample at a concentration of 100 micrograms per liter. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) as kerosene was found in soil samples ranging in concentration from 14 to 32 mg/kg, but was not detected in groundwater. TPH as kerosene concentrations in soil were below the action level of 100 mg/kg. No action level exists for vegetable oil in soil or groundwater (ENSCO Environmental Services, 1988). No documentation from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or any other environmental agency on action taken at the KACC site existed in the RWQCB files. Mr. David Bar with the RWQCB stated the KACC case is inactive, a status which usually occurs when there is a shortage of staff to investigate the case at its onset. Even though the groundwater flow is the area is to the east, Mr. Bar indicated that the subject property was unlikely to have been impacted by the KACC site due to the distance, just under one mile, between the two sites. Proposition 65 (Notify 65) Notify 65 contains facility notifications about any release which could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The Notify 65 database search indicated one Notify 65 site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Arco Service Station #6182 is located approximately 0.40 miles west of the subject property. The site was also listed in the LUST Region 2 database as having reported a release from a gasoline UST in 1988. According to the EDR report, the Santa Clara Valley Water District SCVWD) signed off on the site on July 29, 1996. Due to the case closure by the SCVWD, it is unlikely that the Notify 65 site has impacted the subject property. California Hazardous Material Information Reporting System (CHMIRS) The CHMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to Department of Transportation. The CHMIRS database search indicated no CHMIRS sites within a one -mile radius of the subject CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 5 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Section 4 Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Records Review property. State Index of Properties with Hazardous Waste (Cortese) The Cortese database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with underground storage tanks having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency. The Cortese database search indicated two Cortese sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. The Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation is located just under a mile from the subject property. A detailed description of the release and subsequent investigation can be found above in the section on CAL -SITES sites. The other Cortese site is the Measurex Corporation and is further discussed under LUST sites. Toxic Pits Toxic Pit sites are suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. The Toxic Pits database search indicated no Toxic Pit sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. California Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup (CA SLIC) CA SLIC sites are sites that have impacted groundwater or have the potential to impact groundwater. The CA SLIC database is provided by the RWQCB. The CA SLIC database search indicated one CA SLIC site within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. The Cupertino Post Office is located approximately 0.45 miles east of the subject property. The EDR report states a release from a waste oil UST occurred at the site. The RWQCB closed the site investigation on August 10, 1993. Based on the case closure by the RWQCB, it is unlikely that the CA SLIC site has impacted the subject property. State Landfill The Solid Waste Facilities /Landfill SITES site (SWF/LF) type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that fail to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. The State Landfill database search indicated no state landfill sites located within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-6 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks (UST/AST), Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historic listing of UST and LUST sites. The source of the database is from the State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB). The database search located no registered UST sites within a 0.25 -mile radius. The AST database lists registered ASTs as reported by the SWRCB. The EDR database reported no ASTs at the subject property. The LUST database search indicated 11 LUST sites within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. Of the 11 sites listed, "Dennis Hall Property," "Arco #6182," "U.S. Postal Service," and "Measurez Corporation" are duplicates. Of the remaining seven LUST sites, six site investigations have been closed ("Facciola Residence," "Dennis Hall Property," "Arco," "US Postal Service," "Higdon, Alley, Kolb" and "Measurex Corporation"). Neither the RWQCB nor the SCVWD has a file for the remaining site, the Mobile Service Station. The RWQCB and the EDR database report that the site was removed from the SCVWD's LUST database. Ms. Jeanette Townsend of the SCVWD, the lead agency for the site, confirmed that that agency has no file for the site and if the site was removed from the LUST database there was no contamination problem at the site. This concurs with the EDR database which reports the soil contamination occurred at such a low level as to not pose a threat to water quality. Based on the information from the RWQCB and SCVWD, it is unlikely that the LUST sites have impacted the subject property. Waste Management Unit Database (WMUDS/SWAT) WMUDS/SWAT is used by the SWRCB to track and inventory waste management units and consist of 12 separate databases. The WMUDS/SWAT database search indicated there are no WMUDS/SWAT sites within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. Hazardous Waste Information System (HAZNET) The California Environmental Protection Agency provides a database (HAZNET) from the manifest data extracted from copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The HAZNET database search indicated four HAZNET sites within a 0.25 -mile radius of the subject property. Of the four sites, "Clarks Auto Parts & Machine" is a duplicate. The three remaining sites Dan Facciola", "Lynn Markey", and "Clarks Auto Parts & Machine") do not have files at the California Environmental Protection Agency. The DTSC is currently reviewing their files to determine if information exists on the remaining sits. If information does become available that suggests a HAZNET site has had the potential to impact the subject property, CDM will notify the Cupertino Public Works Department. California Facility Inventory Database (FID) California Environmental Protection Agency provides the Facility Inventory Database (FID) which contains a historical listing from the SWRCB. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-7 JACUPERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review The FID database search indicated no FID sites within a 0.25 -mile radius of the subject property. California Waste Discharge System (CA WDS) CA WDS sites are sites which may have been issued waste discharge requirements by the SWRCB. The CA WDS database search indicated the subject property is not a CA WDS site. South Bay Site Management System (SOUTH BAY) The SOUTH BAY database lists groundwater pollution cases in the Santa Clara Valley where the regulatory lead is the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. The SOUTH BAY database search indicted the subject property is not a SOUTH BAY site. Orphan Sites Orphan sites are sites listed in any of the databases EDR searched and are potentially within one mile of the subject property, but cannot be accurately mapped. The EDR database search indicated eight orphan sites potentially within one -mile of the subject property. Two sites are duplicates either of sites on the orphans list or sites from the other databases ("Arco Stn #495" and "Kaiser Aluminum"). Based on the partial addresses provided for the orphan sites, CDM concluded five of the sites to be greater than one -mile from the subject property: "Arco Service Station #495," "Texaco," "Doneervyn's," and "Rancho Service Center." The remaining site, Hanson Permanente Cement, formerly Kaiser Cement Corporation, is located just under one mile west of the subject property. A number of USTs in five areas at the site have been removed or closed in place. In 1993, Kaiser Cement Corporation removed one 10,000 -gallon diesel UST and two 10,000 -gallon gasoline USTs from the Upper Service Station area. Soil samples revealed only minor levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons. TPH as gasoline was detected at a maximum concentration of 22 mg/kg, and TPH as diesel was not detected above laboratory reporting limits (RWQCB, 1995). The RWQCB closed the site investigation of this area in 1995. A copy of the closure letter is included in Appendix D. According to SCVWD files, four 1,000 -gallon diesel USTs were removed from the Lower Service Station. Floating product was observed in the tank pit and excavated soils had a strong diesel odor, but no soil samples were collected. One 4,000 -gallon diesel UST was removed from the Emergency Generator Area. During removal, the tank appeared undamaged but its lines and plumbing showed signs of leakage. Excavated soil had a diesel odor and contained product. No soil samples were obtained from this area. USTs were also removed from the Garage and Oil House areas. At least two of these USTs were closed in place. According to the SCVWD, no further remedial work is necessary at the Garage and Oil House areas. On March 2, 1999, the SCVWD requested Hanson Permanent Cement submit a work plan to define the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the Lower Service Station and the Emergency Generator Area (SCVWD, 1999). According to Ms. Adele Shepherd with SCVWD, Hanson Permanente Cement submitted a workplan which has been approved by the SCVWD and is now being implemented. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-8 JACUPERTI N\PHASE-I\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review Even though the groundwater flow is the area is to the east, due to the distance of the Hanson Permanente Cement site from the subject property (just under one mile), the potential is minimal that the LUST site has impacted the subject property. 4.2 Physical Setting The property is located in the west -central portion of the Santa Clara Valley which is a broad structural trough infilled with alluvial sediments. The subject property is within the corporate boundaries of the City of Cupertino. Stevens Creek flows adjacent to the east and south sides of the subject property. The climate in the area maintains a fairly constant temperature due the effects of surrounding bodies of water, the Pacific Ocean and the San Francisco Bay. Summers are cool and often foggy and winters are moderately wet. The subject property experiences the same climatic conditions as much of the Santa Clara Valley which is represented by climate data collected in San Jose. Based on 50 years of climate data, a monthly average minimum temperature of 41.3 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) occurs in January and a monthly average maximum temperature of 82.2 OF occurs in July. Temperature extremes have been recorded at a low of 19 OF in December 1990 to a high of 108 OF in July 1972. The annual average precipitation is 14.61 inches (Western Regional Climate Center, 1999). The subject property is situated in the central part of the Coast Ranges, which is characterized by a series of parallel, northwesterly -trending, folded and faulted mountain chains. In this part of the province, flatland topography is underlain by recent alluvium which is typically underlain by non -marine and marine sedimentary rocks. The region has been folded and faulted as a result of major uplift of the area. The Department of Water Resources (DWR) identifies the Santa Clara Formation as a principle group of the water -bearing units in the Santa Clara Valley groundwater basin (Bulletin No. 118-1, 1975). DWR's report modeled the entire basin and identified preferential groundwater pathways created by highly permeable coarse-grained channel deposits of the Santa Clara Formation which have been intersected by numerous faults. Another study by DWR (Bulletin No. 66-62, 1964) states that the main source of groundwater in the Santa Clara Valley is the younger alluvium and that the Santa Clara Formation is of secondary importance. In addition, the principal aquifers of the area exhibit pressure characteristics so that the groundwater is both confined and unconfined. Groundwater flow in the area generally follows the topography, which would indicate an easterly flow gradient (EMCON Associates, 1993). Groundwater in this area of the Santa Clara Valley is generally a bicarbonate type with sodium and calcium the predominant cations. Although moderately to very hard, the waters are of good to excellent quality and suitable for most uses DWR, 1964). CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-9 JACU PEATI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews On April 22, 1999, CDM met with Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, one of the four owners of the subject property, at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir was interviewed by CDM to obtain information regarding the subject property history, existing conditions, and property -specific information related to current and past operations. The Stocklmeir family has owned the subject property since the 1900s, and Mr. Stocklmeir is the most knowledgeable of the current family owners about the subject property. The interview was followed by a walkthrough of the subject property. The subject property was assessed for recognized environmental conditions with respect to hazardous substances, solid waste/non-hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos - containing materials, air quality, storage tanks, water, wastewater, storm water, herbicides and pesticides, and lead-based paint. CDM did not access the interior of the buildings on the subject property, but observations were made through the windows. 5.1 Hazardous Substances No hazardous substances were observed at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir is not aware of any spills or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property or surround properties. During the site walkthrough, CDM did not observe any operations that would produce hazardous wastes. 5.2 Solid Waste/Non-Hazardous Waste During the site walkthrough, several piles of solid waste were observed at the subject property. One small pile of used wooden shingles is present at the southern end of the site. Along the western boundary of the subject property, small piles of building materials such as metal fencing, lumber, and metal pipes were observed (Photograph 9). Mr. Stocklmeir indicated the shingles were previously used on one of the pump houses, and the building materials are related to his personal contractor business. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, there are no discarded items on the subject property. Residential waste generated at the subject property is disposed of through Cupertino's city-wide trash disposal service. 5.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls According to Mr. Bob Bondy of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), there are two pieces of oil -filled electrical equipment on the subject property. A capacitor bank is located at the northeastern corner of the subject property at the corner of the driveway and Stevens Creek Boulevard. According to Mr. Bondy, the capacitor is labeled as having no PCB -containing fluid. PG&E also operates a pole -mounted transformer located at the southern corner of the subject property. No sticker is affixed to this transformer. According to Mr. Bondy, PG&E does not test transformers for PCBs if they have not been leaking. Mr. Bondy stated that if the residential units at CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC5. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews the subject property are demolished, PG&E will remove the transformer. 5.4 Asbestos -Containing Materials The main residence, studio, and the other subject property structures were constructed between 1900 and 1950, before the commercial use of asbestos -containing material (ACM). ACM are usually found in structures built or renovated between the late 1950's and the early 1980's. However, it is likely that during renovations and additions to the building friable and/or non -friable ACM was used. The existence of friable and/or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. However, without conducting an asbestos survey, the presence and extent, if any, of ACM at the subject property cannot be determined. 5.5 Air Quality The site walkthrough did not reveal any particulate, gas, odor, or emission to the atmosphere from the subject property that would violate any environmental regulation. No violations for the subject property are on file with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 5.6 Storage Tanks According to Mr. Stocklmeir, no USTs are located on the subject property. CDM did not discover any indication that a UST exists or existed at the subject property. One approximately 400 -gallon AST is located on the dirt on the east side of the driveway Photograph 10). According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the AST contained propane used to heat the main residence in the 1930s and 1940s. Use of the AST was discontinued in the mid -1940s or earlier when natural gas became available. To Mr. Stocklmeir's knowledge, the AST is empty. Mr. Stocklmeir is not aware of a permit for the AST or if the AST has been located at any other spot on the subject property. The AST appeared to be in good condition with some light rust along the upper rim and did not appear to be connected to any piping. 5.7 Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water According to Mr. Stocklmeir, a groundwater well was installed at the subject property between 1900 to 1905 by his great grandfather. The well is located outside the eastern pump house located at the southern end of the subject property. The main residence was connected to the city water supply in the 1940s or earlier. Mr. Stocklmeir stated the well is abandoned and has not been used in over 50 years. The well has not been destroyed. A one -compartment septic tank is located on the east side of the driveway, as shown in Figure 3-2 Photograph 11). The approximately 700 -gallon tank services the main residence and the studio apartment. Only sanitary wastewater is generated at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir is unaware of when the septic tank was installed, but stated it was there when his grandparents lived at the subject property starting in 1949. To Mr. Stocklmeir's knowledge, no permit exists for the septic tank. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5-2 J:\CUPERT1N\PHASE-1\SEC5.WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews Mr. Stocklmeir stated occasional stoppages occur every one or two years in the septic tanks lines running from the residences. The commercial service RotoRooter is contracted to clean the lines in those instances. The tank is pumped out every two years by A -Able Septic Tank Company. Three leach lines for the wastewater run underground into the orchard area: one north towards the pump house, and the other two run northeast and east, respectively, into the orchard. Valves to control the flow of the lines are located near the septic tank inside PVC piping. No distressed vegetation was observed in the area of the leach field. Mr. Stocklmeir stated that storm water at the subject property either percolates through the soil or flows east to Stevens Creek. No pavement is present at the subject property except for small patio areas. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, a storm water pipeline runs from the housing development adjacent to the west side of the subject property across the orchard to Stevens Creek via an easement across the subject property. The eastern end of the pipe is visible as a corrugated metal pipe in the western side of the creek bed (Photograph 12). 5.8 Herbicides and Pesticides Use Mr. Stocklmeir hired New View Landscape Service to perform yard work at the subject property consisting of raking and collecting leaves and trimming the bushes. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, no herbicides or pesticides are currently used at the subject property. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, fertilizer has not been used on the orange trees in approximately 10 years. When the orchard produced walnuts for commercial use, the walnut trees were sprayed with herbicides and pesticides. Mr. Stocklmeir stated that mixing or storing of chemicals did not occur at the subject property. The commercial orchard business ended in the late 1960s. No signs of distressed vegetation or stained soil were observed during the site walkthrough. It is possible, although no evidence was found during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement of pesticides (i.e., a spill during mixing or dilution and over application) from historical uses associated with the orchard may have adversely impacted the subject property. In general, pesticides have low vapor pressures, do not biodegrade, and adhere to soil extremely well. Therefore, even though the property stopped serving as an orchard, pesticide residues may still be present in the soil. Farmers began to use DDT as a pesticide in the 1940s. Usually, DDT does not spread to more than a foot below ground surface (Hayes, 1975). According to Toxicology of Pesticides, "residues of pesticides in soil are rarely important as a source of direct exposure to people" (Hayes, 1975). The only orchard maintenance occurring at the subject property is discing of the soil, which could significantly decrease the residual pesticides at the subject property (Hayes, 1975). The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. Major disturbance of the soil may increase potential for human exposure to residual pesticide potentially present in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. 5.9 Lead -Based Paint Due to the age of the buildings on the subject property, it is likely that lead-based paints have been used. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop and on the walls of the western pump house (Photographs 3 and 5). CDM observed no paint chips on the soil at these areas. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead-based paint is minimal. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5-3 JAGUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC5. W PD Section 6 Conclusions and Recommendations This Phase I ESA is based upon information researched and made available to CDM through May 5, 1999. Any subsequent information received by CDM which modifies the conclusions of this report will be submitted to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department in later correspondence. Based on the information provided to CDM and observations made during the walkthrough of the subject property, no recognized environmental conditions at the subject property were discovered during the performance of the Phase I ESA. No information was discovered that would suggest that off-site properties had released contaminants that would results in environmental contamination of the subject property. However, due to the age of the structures at the subject property it is likely asbestos -containing material (ACM) and lead-based paints were used during construction and any renovations. The existence of friable and/or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. Prior to any renovation or demolition of the buildings at the subject property, CDM recommends a certified asbestos consultant conduct an asbestos survey of the buildings. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop building and on the wall of the western pump house. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead-based paint is minimal. In addition, the subject property served as a commercial orchard until the late 1960s. It is possible, although no evidence was found during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement (i.e., spill during mixing or dilution and over application) of pesticides from uses associated with the orchard may have adversely impacted the subject property. The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. The orchard maintenance that occurs at the subject property could reduce the residual pesticides in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. Prior to any major disturbance of the soil at the subject property, CDM recommends collecting soil samples to determine the extent of impact, if any. Finally, one abandoned well exists at the eastern pump house in the southwest section of the subject property. If the well will no longer be used, CDM recommends properly destroying the well with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 6-1 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-I\SEC6. W PD Section 7 References, contacts, and List of Acronyms Used References Department of Health Services, 1987. Letter to Mr. Phil Bobel, USEPA Region IX. April 8, 1987. Department of Health Services, 1988. Letter to Mr. Pirooz Lahiji, Zilog Corporation, Subject: Zilog Facility, 10640 Bubb Road, Cupertino, EPA ID No. CAD 076314459. October 13, 1988. Department of Water Resources, 1964. "Quality of Ground Waters in California, 1961 and 1962, Park I, Northern and Central California," State of California Department of Water Resources, Bulletin No. 66-62, August 1964. Department of Water Resources, 1975. "Evaluation of Ground Water Resources: South San Francisco Bay, Volume III: Northern Santa Clara County Area," State of California Department of Water Resources in cooperation with Santa Clara Valley Water District, Bulletin No. 118-1, December 1975. EMCON Associates, 1993. Environmental Evaluation Report, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, Permanente Facility, Cupertino, California. June 1993. ENSCO Environmental Services, Incorporated, 1988. Letter to Mr. Rich Merkel, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. June 6, 1988. Exceltech, Incorporated, 1988. Soil and Groundwater Investigation for Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. January 5, 1988. Hayes, Wayland J., Jr., 1975. Toxicology of Pesticides. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore. 1975. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1960. Aerial photograph AV 385/7/13. August 22, 1960. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1968. Aerial photograph AV 857/1/7. July 15,1968. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1978. Aerial photograph AV 1497/4/6. May 8,1978. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1989. Aerial photograph AV 3661/9/ 2. October 18, 1989. Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1995. Letter to Mr. Phil Gaynor, Kaiser Cement Corporation, Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certificate for 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. December 21, 1995. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC7. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 7 References, Contacts, List of Acronyms Used Santa Clara Valley Water District, 1999. Letter to Mr. Earl Bouse, Hanson Permanente Cement, Subject: Fuel Leak Investigation at Kaiser Cement, 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. March 2, 1999. United States Geological Survey, Cupertino Quadrangle, California, 15 Minute Series (Topographic), 1961, photorevised 1980. Western Regional Climate Center, 1999. SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA (047821), Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary, Period of Record: 71111948 to 12/ 31/1998. Web site http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi- bin/ cliMAIN.p l?casj os+sfo. Contacts Santa Clara County Recorder Santa Clara County Assessor 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 1st Floor 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 5th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 San Jose, CA 95110 408-299-2481 408-299-3227 Adele Shepherd David Bar Jeanette Townsend San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Santa Clara Valley Water District Control Board 5750 Almaden Expressway 1515 Clay Street, #1400 San Jose, CA 95118 Oakland, CA 94612 408-265-2600 510- 622-2300 Bob Bondy Bay Area Air Quality Management District Pacific Gas and Electric Company 939 Ellis Street 10900 North Blaney Avenue San Francisco, CA 94109 Cupertino, CA 95014 408-725- 2204 Alan Stocklmeir 10240 Stonydale Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 408-738-3758 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7- 2 JACU P ERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC7. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment List of Acronyms Used Section 7 References, Contacts, List of Acronyms Used ACM Asbestos -Containing Material AST Aboveground storage tank ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWP California Annual Workplan CA SLIC California Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup CA WDS California Waste Discharge System CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS - No Further Response Action Planned Facilities CERCLIS CERCLA Information System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Information Reporting System CONSENT Superfund Consent Decrees CORRACTS Corrective Actions DHS California Department of Health Services DTSC Department of Toxic Substance Control DWR California Department of Water Resources EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ESA Environmental Site Assessment FID California Facility Inventory Database FINDS Facility Index System HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting Systems KACC Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation LUST Leaking underground storage tank mg/kg millograms per kilogram MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System NPL National Priorities List PADS PCB Activity Database PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company RAATS RCRA administration action tracking system RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ROD Records of Decision RWQCB San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities /Landfill SWRCB State Water Resource Control Board TPH Total petroleum hydrocarbons TRIS Toxic Release Inventory Database TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TSD Treat, store, or dispose (of hazardous waste) USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UST Underground storage tank WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7-3 JACU P ERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC7. W PD Appendix A Site Photographs 143 11 vo r - ell IV k f,jfti 1. i Vb b / 46 l... i , mow.' 11 F ell IV F ell k Vb N IRS ij. lip z -w anfit ki Tl April 22, 1999 Photograph 7 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Orange trees in main orchard area. April 22, 1999 Photograph 8 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Walnut and apricot trees in northern orchard area. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California D April 22, 1999 Photograph 9 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Piles of building materials along western edge of subject property. April 22, 1999 Photograph 10 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Abandoned propane AST along subject property driveway. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California April 22, 1999 Photograph 11 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Septic tank used for main residence and studio apartment, along driveway. April 22, 1999 Photograph 12 Photographed B; Andria Pomponi Description: Loc along Stevens C where residentia stormwater line along eastern ed subject property SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California Appendix B Information Reviewed i 2 3 4 5 7 9 1C 1 1J 14 13- i55Z5 17 13 7 Q 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2'7 28 LAW 0MCKa ortrelc.A rO..t AYC.Y[ TING. CA 35014 59-CS91 REC. FUEE i l _ MICS0 IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO-RN_ A OTB +, IN AND -70R THE CCU -:TY Or SANTA CLARA E, 1PF In re the -Estate of ) No. i06206 1jU- C-GM_ENT OF DISTRZBUTZGN LOUTS STCC{L..j7IR j ON -.,JA 7,r:--' OF ,CCGJNTING Decedent_ ) Hearing a*e. :larch 1 2cJ' 984 GLAD71S 3. S_CC:{ X_-- _R, _s t ,e Executorc f e Estate o - LOUIS E. S1'CC :_4E1, deceased, hav_na heretofcr-e filed 'her verified re crt cf ixec:ltCr on Waivers cz AccCunting and Petition for Final tD1j:.._tr .7LI_Cn, and t:+e same C;'*i_ng on -h47, duv reQlllu_'1v fOT hE'ar7n-, the Court finds: Due nctice of the hear4 na of the ceti tion has oeen regularly I ' given as requ: red by law. I I All allegations of the Petition are true. LOUIS E. STCCXL.;SEIR died testate on September 24, 1982, in1 i the County of Santa Clara,, State of California, and was a resident thereof at the time of his death_ Decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977 was admitted to Probate by Order of this Court on vanuary 3, 1983. Petitioner qualified as Executor and Letters Testamentary were issued to Petitioner on January 3, 1983, and at all times since then has been and now is the Executor of decedent's Will_ 9I+yRA'!'!i"ziR-..,. .-:- ,. ,...•. . 1 .._....-.-_„.__.....-._.-___._.._.-.-.._.__.._.-,.__.._.._.__. _._...__.. ......... ..._- 5018008 FILED FIR RECORD 1: } MTTFROSTLACIOFFICES 10413 Ai lUE... Torre Avenue 1*y0 G 9 1084 Cupertino, CA 95014P Z9 12 40 !' 1. Ce,,ntj Clc:% Telephone: (408) 253-053_:y GrylC!AL RECORDS JAMES A_ FROST S.i'A CLARA COUNT. GE A. )AANN 3•,. DEPUTY Attorney for Petitioner T?AR REGMER REC. FUEE i l _ MICS0 IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO-RN_ A OTB +, IN AND -70R THE CCU -:TY Or SANTA CLARA E, 1PF In re the -Estate of ) No. i06206 1jU-C-GM_ENT OF DISTRZBUTZGN LOUTS STCC{L..j7IR j ON -.,JA 7,r:--' OF ,CCGJNTING Decedent_ ) Hearing a*e. :larch 12cJ' 984 GLAD71S 3. S_CC:{ X_-- _R, _s t ,e Executorc f e Estate o - LOUIS E. S1'CC :_4E1, deceased, hav_na heretofcr-e filed 'her verified re crt cf ixec:ltCr on Waivers cz AccCunting and Petition for Final tD1j:.._tr .7LI_Cn, and t:+e same C;'*i_ ng on -h47, duv reQlllu_'1v fOT hE'ar7n-, the Court finds: Due nctice of the hear4 na of the ceti tion has oeen regularlyI ' given as requ: red by law. I I All allegations of the Petition are true. LOUIS E. STCCXL.;SEIR died testate on September 24, 1982, in1 i the County of Santa Clara,, State of California, and was a resident thereof at the time of his death_ Decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977 was admitted to Probate by Order of this Court on vanuary 3, 1983. Petitioner qualified as Executor and Letters Testamentary were issued to Petitioner on January 3, 1983, and at all times since then has been and now is the Executor of decedent's Will_ 9I+yRA'!'!i"ziR-..,. .-:- ,. ,...•. .1 .._....-.-_„.__.....-._.-___._.._.-.-.._.__.._.-,.__.._.._.__. _._...__.. ......... ..._- 1410- 636 1 Notice to Creditors has been duly given as required by law, 2 the time for filing or presenting claims has expired, and the 3 estate is now in a condition to be closed. 1 No claims have been filed or presented against the estate. 5 ` All debts of the decedent and of the estate and all the expenses 6 ! of the administration except closing expenses, attorney's fees, - 7 Executor-conlissions, and certain costs advanced by the attorney 8 have been paid. 9 An Amended Invento-y and Aopraiser,etit of the estate was duly 10 returned and tiled cn December 5, 1983, showing the value of the 11 decedent's estate to be $613,220.00. 12 All personal prooerty taxes due and payable by the estate, 13 if any, have been paid. A clearance is on file. 14 A federal estate tax return has been filed for the estate 15 and the tax shown in the return has been paid. The total state 16 death tax credit allowable for federal and state tax purposes has 17 been calculated and paid to the State of California. The return 18 has not yet been audited. Petitioner has not been released from 19 personal liability for federal,estate tax. 20 All California state_ and federal income taxes becoming due 21 and payable during the period of administration of the estate if 22 any, and the filing of closing fiduciary income tax return will 23 be assumed by the Petitioner. 24 The Waivers vi Accounting by JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, ALAN L. 25 STOCKLMEIR, and DFAMN STOCKLMEIR, all the beneficiaries and 26 remaindermen under the Will of the decedent are on file herein. 27 The Petitioner should be authorized and directed to pay to 28 herselZ the sum of $13,414.40 in discharge of statutory commissions T Ll.w FFICL!S A OIt[< IOt L 2- LOMVIIN,.ltli. GUPCHTINO. U 91010 00) 11:2-0131 4mm.. ..0n,,., _ a 3a :r+Ja+.k t a `.r it - r:4 • .... F , 7 i , 1 The Petitioner should be authorized and directed to pay to 2 JAMES A. FROST, Esq. the sum of $13,414.40 as the statutory attorney 3 fess for his services rendered to the administration in.this estate, i4inthesumof $350. 80 for costs advanced. + i 5 The Petitioner should be authorized to retain $:;00.00 in cash 6 pending a final audit of tax returns, and for any liabilities that 7 may be determined to be due from the estate. 8 Distribution should be ordered as prayed for in the Petition 9 and as hereinafter in this Order specified. 10 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: li 1. The administration of this estate is brought to a close, 12 without requirement of an accounting. 13 2. All the acts and proceedings of the Petitioner as Executor 14 relating to matters set forth in the Petition are ratified, confirmL 15 and approved. 16 3. The Executor is authorized and directed to pay to herself 17 the sum of $13,414.40, statutory commission for services rendered 18 to the estate. 19 4. The Executor is authorized and directed to pay to the 20 attorney, JAMES A. FROST, Esq., the sum of $13,414.40, the statutor} 21 fees for servicos rendered in the administration of this estate, 22 and the sum of $350.80 for certain costs advanced. 23 5. Petitioner is authorized to retain $300.00 for closing 24- expenses of administration and as a reserve for a possible tax 25 deficiencies, and to deliver the unused part to the Trustee appoint( 26 herein without further Court order after the closing expenses have 27 been paid and the various taxes have been finally determined 28 settled. 9T %W OFFICES c ueanw_ 3 _ rneror.wr urr, io nlnec wvc..u[ V. WD—.D. CA 35014 401 157.0531 I 1 2 J 4 51 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7BT LAW OFFICER M(]I[C.IUHAI UNMIINA TIQN IO.IJ TU..0 -C-C CUI•ERTIND. CA 95014 4:18) 753.0531 14 (53 6. Notice to Creditors has been given as required by law; 7. The Executor has in her possession belonging to said estate and remaining for distribution the following described property which is to be distributed in the following manner in accordance with the terms of decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977: - a. To DEAN STOCKLMEIR as to a one-half (_1/2) interest and to ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR and JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, in equal shares, as to a one-half interest in the miscellaneous fur:ziture, furnishin, and personal effects located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulev?rd, Cupertino, California. b. The real property described herein below„is distribu;_d to DEAN STCCKLMEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR, in trust, to be held, administered, and distributed by the Co -Trustees in accordance with the terms of the decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977: 1) Unimproved real property in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as: ALL OF LOTS 30 and 31, as shown on the Map entitled, TRACT NO. 5915 THE MEADOWS OF CUPERTINO", which Map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County cf Santa Clara, State of California on November 30, 1976, in Book 384 of Maps, at pages 18 and 19. 2) ResidentaV real property commonly ;mown as 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California and situated in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL NO. 1 Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section No. 278 as delineai- d and so designated on the Map hereinafter referred to; thenco running among the Easterly lines of Sections No. 278, 275 and 275 A as shown on said Map, N. 120 1' W. 402 feet to the Southeasterly line of Scenic Boulevard; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of Scenic Boulevard, 76.33 feet; thence S. 0° 7' W. to the Northwesterly corner of said Section 275 and continuing S. 0° 7' W. along the Test line of said Section 275 and along the extension of said West line a total distance of 334.30 feet to a point on the South line 4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7 28 IOST LAW OFFICES rHorr u mui UHVfIpAI ON ia.0 rt1HHc wvrHu[ r:OPIERTIN0, CA 95014 409) 357.0331 n 1410. 1- 639 of said Section 278 distant thereon East 25 feet fromtheSouthwestcornerofsaidSection278; thence East130.35 feet to the point of beginning, and being allofSectionsNumbered275and275AandpartsofSectionsNumbered274and278, as said Sections are delineatedandsodesignateduponthatcertainMapentitled, "MapofInspirationPoint, Monta Vista", and which Map wasfiledforrecordintheofficeoftheRecorderoftheCountyofSantaClara, State of California, on April11, 1917, in Book "P" of Maps, page 18. PARCEL NO. 2 Beginning at the point of intersection of the SoutherlylineofStevensCreekRoad, as it formerly existed 40feetwide, with the center line of Stevens Creek; thenceinageneralSoutherlydirectionalongthecenterline Of Stevens Creek the following courses and distances; S. 480 30' E. 110,55 feet; S. 590 45' E. 132.00 feet; S. 45° E. 162.03 feet; S. 3° 37' E. 122.10 feet; S. 4° 8' W. 231.66 feet; S. 24° W. 80.26 feet; S. 36° T4. 199.32feet; S. 2S° W. 54.12 feet; and S. 36° 30' W. 107.38feettoastationdesignatedD. S.. 5 from which a sycamc_e14inchesindiametermarketB.T.D.S.5 bears S. 360 45' E. 17.82 feet; thence leaving the center line of Stevens Creek and running along the Easterly line of Monta VistaPark, the Map of which is of record in Bo -k "P" of Maps, page 19, Santa Clara County Records, and along theEasterlylineofInspirationPoint, Monta Vista, theMapofwhichisofrecordinBook "P" of Maps, page 18, Santa Clara County Records, the following courses anddistances; N. 40 41' W. 339.24 feet to a station designatedD. S. 4; N.4° 11' W. 191.40 feet to a pipe; and N. 12° 1' W. 448.00 feet to a pipe at the Northeasterly cornerofsaidInspirationPoint, Monta Vista; thence N. 37° 42' W. 13.00 feet to a pipe on said Southerly line ofStevensCreekRoad; thence along said Southerly lineofStevensCreekRoad, N.'890 E. 84.48 feet to the pointofbeginning, containing 4.857 acres of land, more orless, and being a portion of the San Antonio Rancho, and being shown upon that certain Map entitled, "MapofasurveymadeforAdelheidM. Stocklmeir in the SanAntonioRanch", which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder or the Recorder of the CountyofSantaClara, State of California, on Decemb.-r 29, 1915, in "-.ok "O" of Maps, page 88. C. Decedent's Will, dated November 18, 1977, provides as follows: I. I further give, devise and bequeath to the said DEAN STOCKLMEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR, as Co -Trustees, in trust, my 5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i 11 1:2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RO LAW OFFICES HUI I'RRtU.a AL U HI•IIHwtIU. 14 1: 1_ IIIFHC wVl. I.uC ru 7TINII. C; 95014 re) U5:1•U571 a, interest, if Ltny, in any real property that my said wife and I are using as our principal residence at the time of my death. Such residence shall be held, administered, sold, or distributed in accordance with the trust provisions se,: forth hereinbelow. 2. Said trust shall terminate upon the death of my wife, GLADYS BOYER STOCKLMEIP.. Upon the death of my wife, then the Co- Trustees'shall distribute and deliver free of trust, all of the then balance of the trust estate, as follows, to wit: a. On th_reof to my said son, DEAN STOCKLMEIR. b. One-half thereof to my said grandchildren, ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR and JANET L. STOCKLIKEIR, in equal sharps, or to the survivor of them, if either should predecease me or die before the termination of this trust, .end leavt3 no issue surviving. 3. To carry out the purposes of the trust, the Co -Trustees are vested with the following powers in addition to those now or hereafter confirmed by law, affecting the trust and trust estate: a) Whenever the right of any beneficiary to receive payments from net income or principal hereundershallterminate, either by reason of death or otherwise, all such payments accrued or undistributed by the Co -Trustees at the date of such termination shall be distributed in equal shares to the beneficiaries entitled to the successive interest hereunder, orifthey `)e deceased but survived by issue, then to such issue in accordance with the provisions hereof. b) Upon any division of partial or final distribution of the trust estate, and except as herein specifically provided, the Co -Trustees maydivideordistributesuchpropertyinkind, includingundividedintereststherein, or in their absolute discretion the Cc -Trustees may sell all or any part of such property and make such division or distributionincashorpartlyincashandpartlyinkind; and the decision of the Co -Trustees as to what constitutes a proper division of the trust estate either prior to or upon any distribution thereof shall be binding upon all of the beneficiaries. i — 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 J'3 H 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 RON 9T' AW OFFICES s • nu ura r1 nus nun u 1aw.c s u uc PrurIN0. c. 75014 40V - - 253-0531 c) The Ca -Trustees shall have the power, with respect to the property of the trust estate or anypartthereof, and upon such terms and in such manner as they may deem advisable, to sell, convey, exchange, Convert, improve, repair, manage, operate, and control; to lease for terms within or beyond the term of this trust and for any purpose, including exploration for and removal of gas, oil and other minerals; to borrow money for any trust purpose, and to encumber or hypothecate by mortgage, deed of tru_t, pledge or otherwise; to carry insurance of such kinds and in - such amounts as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable, at the expense of the trust; to compromise or otherwise adjust any claims against or in favor of the trust; to commence or defend such litigation with respect to the trust or any property of the trust estate as it may deem advisable, at the expense of the trust; to invest and reinvest the trust mounds in such property as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable; whether or not of the character permitted by law for the investment of trust funds; and with respect to securities held in trust, to vote, give proxies, and pay assessments or other charges, to participate in foreclosures, reorganizations, consolidations, mergers ancf liquidations, and incident thereto to deposit securities with and transfer title to any protective or other committee upon such terms as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable, and to exercise or sell stock subscription or conversion rights; and the Co -Trustees shall have such additional powers as may now or hereafter be conferred upon it by law or as may be necessary to enable the Co -Trustees to administer this trust in accordance with the provisions of this Will, subject to any limitations thereof that may be provided herein. d) The Co -Trustees are authorized to loan or advance their own funds to, the trust for any purpose thereof, at the then current rate of interest, and any such loan or advance, together with interest shall be a first lien against the trust estate and shall be repaid therefrom. e) '2he Co -Trustees may hold securities or other property in this trust in their name as Co -Trustees hereunder, or in their own name, or in the name of their nominee, or the Co -Trustees may hold such securities unregistered in such condition that ownership will pass by delivery. f) Ail property taxes, assessments, fees, charges and other expenses incurred by the Co - Trustees in the administration or protection of this trust, including the compensation allowed by the Court to the Co -Trustees and their attorneys for their services hereunder, shall be a charge upon the trust estate 7— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24: 25 26 27 28 iCMT LAW OFFICES rnn •eiaH t ', r.•ua r ar. 1w• nlewt AV(MIIC ZUP CIN(]• CA 79010 l d+df 75:1.05.11 r I U.0 642 and sha11 be paid by the Co -Trustees in full out of the principal or in full out of the income of the trust estate, or partially out of each of them, in such mangier and proportions as the Co -Trustees in heir absolute discretion may determine to be advisable, prior to final distribution of the trust property; and the determination of the Co -Trustees with respect to all such matters shall be conclusive upon all persons however interested in this trust. g) `Phe Co -Trustees shall have full power and authority to determine, in their ahsclute discretion, what shall constitute principal of the trust estate, gross income .therefrom and net income distributable under the terms of this trust; except as herein otherwise specifically provided, and the determination of the Co -Trustees with respect to all such matters shall be conclusive upon all persons howsoevez interested in this trust. h) No beneficiary of this trust shall have any right to alienate, encumber, or hypothecate his or her interest in the principal or income of the trust in any manner, nor shall such into -est of any such beneficiary be subject to claims of his or her creditors or liable to attachment, execution or other process of j,w. i) I hereby appoint as Co -Trustees of the trust created herein, DEAN STOCKLHEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR. A Trustee shall ;nave the right to resign at any time, and upon such resignation if no successor Trustee be herein designated, the Trustee resigning or any beneficiary of the trust may secure the appointment OE a successor Trustee by a Ccurt of competent jurisdiction, at the expense of the trust. j) The successor of a Trustee, whether through death or resignation as Trustee hereunder, or otherwise, shall forthwith become a successor Trustee hereunder, and shall succeed to all title of a Trustee to the trust estate, and all powers, rights, discretions, obligations, and immunities of a Trustee hereunder, with the game effect as though such successor were originally named herein as Trustee. 4. Any ocher property of the estate not now known or discover, which may belong to the estate, or in which the decedent or the estate may have: any interest, is distributed to DEAN STOCKLMEIR i SP -; 643 1 as to a one-half (1/2) interest therein and to ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR 2 and JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, in equal shares as to a one-half (1/2) 3 interest therein. 4 DATED: , -.,, . „- 1984 5I JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 7 8 9 10 SIO R s 12 a * ' ® tart i copy of, the 0611 A 13 h' r T — A 1 "a ST 14 e% ... - ®. 'County ClerkL • •,' S ta Clara i 15 rir p County 4(t ttl u,as`a Sh Geri a n-atn:e Clam H(tspt gS erior C) a t IiY 1/ A t` LYdISeatiClue DEPUTY16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RosT LAW OFFICES AOROi [\10',L 9_ Q.l3 r ... c —C.U[ CUP[RTINO. CA 95014 40B) 753.0531 All t \ 7`,,3:.}' '.;r w:.s:ui ; I I, :,'j 1_.-.''u:f ):o-rua"_i xi„ky,r_c, c .c .r r. g 1';'FAd' i.. yq ''t ' f'^4: 7 \Y , aI . - - s '1 rg F y' a"T>—' j C T S? , it l ' I tt°. r 4•, i y S%r 1 , 'rye, i i• W - L11 Tt 'X :.1 :ltlil`` . ` I 4 ] qty sf-,,$.,y7,.,': ` gyp, t( I /" '1y y,] 1^, f k L t } i` C.•1 In t'1' i :f9"'+ %-s.i+i' r1TP' t. 1.b.i.., t • 4i,+ 1-, 1 ,T7i •': 7 y'YI Cr - 7' M"T4 f y , .( IY •. 1 yr 4 ra. _,: :rt_f •'•+ .` }'' ' . ^ c' . y y l- ..R LLt:,. 1 • 4 `f!" 'ETeI:' ! `7 E u EEuvu. y , + I::•c [ i { 7;.•'} f' f _ i t' ':•,7'L: ,<' f.'/ ' e ` vax """'t_i y11 ' i,yq" .. Q,.4 t','• t ` . r ••' ` Scn. 3`'' `r ' '''fi i s ` Ur.C.'- .5= s ,• -_ •. ' c-'G_, •',; e`, r'• ss'S1r+t...• `j:f ,i.••,... ' J 7_;.. rte+ !(Q•!',:` / i'T ' r' lr.a N , G 4 f_ _ MFE -'i_, g _ 1 '•''. la: t 'rjt'' ±a I uvy+yy• C43r fF `T t $ ry -.•' , r ,r. :' 'S 4+ Sl,`L"t.tJ I r+t, yl,,, i N. ,6. F,(I '•t'l . t,'' r. M1'l v .r '•"-'P". ;'' S r„'`3 }1 hcar i t'9 j 1; t f n_ ;;'" fi, tY!. 5 . ? p c> :,t t 1 -t i 2' • f ` yy ?' itl_.'l cam. + : , + 5. a'kt, 2'' t 4h Cf riE ~ }{^ •' t 1 a -. F r'.•• .. - rG tI' ---- , 1"' I'':."; irl}'{'h[1.'.,.1''t.,_ , 1!?,-, a', a, I> y4t JR+ ,r' r rT.. €ii •.,, L' X'; cit-L: `. .I;"s' fy a. 1frF.>, `i:' a2'^p.Y, {; " t:`° `Y w . >,<,._ I t - i •• ) ,\i' r {r' Ep v .r, . - 1 µ"+3 jt V, ri S-y y.'• j,t 'i11 i k.[ -, f;'' 1 4 `„ F' 1-' ( F: J r S I q - r , d • i 7r- tt%''y, ,tf. a, S q'`E:Ir yi't I •ii:, le t ,... c'+ 3' Ya• y."` ; ` 1 :.... 4 •[ I''..' g7nS.i . ti ':.7, 3ri„ a^t' , .y'j L' f r'+ kE a'>r - •1 , i t<..+.1 .['r.” ,tl stf u z - ei* , t : kT `ay., yj. ', fi. f + . - ' v. Yi,. 1 . i } 1 r} t +•d .f , L u+' i 9Y t ,. a - i_ Y , r '. Kz yr 7 S4* 1 i/ ^ N t {` y h .t, .•,t` y t . .w > +r : x - _ ,r < , I w :j >;•.....,. fY -1 C } r' S7 ' r ; i• :"•.....%' r e,,°• 1 r ' '>+ Ij Li • * t + J Yk a i" 4 ^w 'i i.; y}p y`' ••'tt. a :, " 1t SL }rd} 5 .t vkS'1Y4` r' " .f• !'i.11l s '+' r cr se e 5 f_ - M _ +': y •t r,;,re ltl t4. C, f. , j F 7 .:,^r,:, yam[ U '';` 4 i ,<., f 4 - ii. `• LC/'G^Fr [ ,v 1 Ci.. "`t' - ` t, ` ,r I,o+ l ,f .i,W',,yy,.< et y • 1 :':: 4' q{ F\ t 1, . r'; i" c } il r• i'o r t 11 . i }ya. pV`''alj '. C!>•8 ' I- +"' ' - ''-' ' . :i ` 1- ' , . 4. 3t" n 1f l r a 7 4y, i•''a'` 4' Z?t{. r # 11 > ' Z s fyrr*s• i 't+i y4r} Y• ig0^ t cij? Try- y,` N;_ ojyk1, '' li + • , L . ` rf' t'' :, tq c t w d , yo- 4•' r J Rr*.'• S 7. t i.% •+i.• - r'' L' p' K {; i t jL,i7 ':yv 9 t _ y i A • . t "5 .E; r i t F• ti : 2 #,.S,T" P l p:. `% h ' ,z .•-,Tib #•_ ' l / ._'''n : c.. ;. •( Y t _ • i7 gyp`_?,t,,, . 1k,,..• f1..^Sti b. ..i"-.-; J+ i. pp . / Lir: a t I St;.' .r '.}1 ci b1W'', _ ', i. r , •" ' : e 1 •, -> s, r y x 4I l' 1`; T rj' A F! i'•iT^" i\+C P, k:i' S. f - f v e . • }.. sj': s] .` • t _ a t' An i ' .'= t 7-•...? t I . ? M. r I is f 1 .'• F f•' . • .' `Xl=/. • t'!: , lJ rt{, A' b' a + i. _ \• F ry 4K t ter, Aerial Photograph August 22, 1960 AERIA YS 8407 Edgewater Drive Ov.Hand, CA 94621 0 (510) 632- ir. IV? - m Aerial Photograph July 15, 1968 IF P A' ILI iq4,.F.aA, W-4iO dio A W, 4 EPA 0 F -J P Vi4141 ho 01 r. DW6iI r vtn 'YY.;fjIg kip Wt Val M T;1 V 2 7- loxfl 4. LLJ V r? tip, 4 IN I 7W01 N. X i. 1.4 Ad 7'. Iwof f. K 3 iL I'A INA fiiE A I!V S;R a AERIAF'1rMEYS 8407 Edge -water Drive 0,-!z1and, CA 94621 - (510) 632-2020 143M Aerial Photograph May 8, 1978 AERIA'FtCIRVEYS 8407 Edgewater Drive O,.!Jr-ind, CA 94621 • (510) 632-2020 1 1Atii.. •,. + Cid`. • ., t y 7,`; .• F,. .7+. , „1• !'j r `, '' nYi ,.fr1,;, '' °. r y r, ,' e J ..f ,, 1T+ . • . 7 ^ ' _. ! `, t emir, i.. 1 4 Lf - i'. 1 :41Y r yr .7} , .,.. 1f J'+ At y 1#,•' ` 1 ; r,j',f•i( F„ ,. fi+. !yaia F!Jc.,dy1 ;l:Y j`•. +.. `i.. ft,f'F 1`; F ! ...+'- 4': l .{e J!'"f=gtis.. ,;`. :Al cItH ?!+. r1., r i' a.i' - ail .:.,, • 1',':k i,•! f 5, •j ••. ,.\, f, J '' i '' r. dy '..•. " ' .w. a ;+ "L f11. +i: 3 ar `y•i l.,JEb" a, i.* ? +rl...i ?,,.?.•f+, , : sm Y 4' s z;,'iK,r `il:E 'i'. '" yr f jl' • II ' gi .E - }t ' fL t_ _ 3 ,1 ' .. J'r 1_. w b•. /f "., , .moii'LI J.I C, .. - _ ,.•„? 1 ..1 J r,: .;z• 4Y s:^,. t• `75y 1G J f + r ty u1IH_! ? P .4 J. a;.i?'93"', r fyj «,1'+Ji r-. T3` S,4t ` y * IT t.JI V. • R. { 1, 1•(., 1111' *. i - J. i 11+ x, 1•• 1 )' y '_ r.. ' iF il .+.` ' 14 4 } ,-" { j F •• I ra - v - ft .f.'a • .¢. wr ,` ; aay__t_N, ti t!s In -4 d; a e ; ! 44 ;,.., t j :-y!S','ti yr; 71,.,? .,ifY af', >> 01 W,•. r T ?• a' r ;i a't `.i • * 'ra L' , til.«y a { ri J [ ..aq'•i+.?r:.. caner ,+ r• '" .".'i1i, i + 4 A wt n . °" ^; 4 n Y14. ! /', R ref •,; ; i,z r'9 ` ; ,.. y . ln . r J`. +, j/f +.l 1•J,_3• 4!`.. 1`.:, SIT w L S. "'i. k', n F =ieJlii' !' :,' r !' # * i. .N°t±. i"aS j! tl i IN L • t. ' a ";. ,M { SII . '- i f _ r f g¢ IF y Y Y EC• i. .. ~. +. i'!tr• ". 3 Y :il '.l+lcr,1'Yl''; A4y +hY+Y" - , A, ljj " p ,ga K,;r 4rC i:. +glon Y. {'c' .'3t•' h' ` - . ; . -" >F$•w`-"r y! F',.T+ :, .fI , s X' ` _ ', e. w "," r• Y + g r r,.,.•la a K ; y1f YL t • 7181 i4! +•i '" w.' `, . K k ..' '+( j' j,' C ,r'. y, V't' 1 a . TJ` i1' S C ti('''i y , .t` y t 1+ k ' • r , ±, xy!•+ s r if -.w -,r ' ii ss{ • , f i . r l h" k. .t^, t.f - '= - 'i L '. ; f - '\'! j ' fill, M1 . i }l1 • '" `t r. }` , R . Jei j .. ° n I ,• ,t 2. f' a 1 aw '-iJ'% '- ''f r' +j i s. k y- 1•j * o. C.l: , `fi' {.i '•`''- y7y _ y. a' f' •. r g 7i j j _ tt. i a + '+A `'•il.'; , .,Y- Y .,, ` n [' a ' i i;"'+"}• '`: `+,,-.,, _.s: r+ i+ 1 `• lr}Y_ 1. t1s-. 1Q lRti1 '. 3 i l 'l4 x : ii `. 1. .ti t r f •le ,. = m M , {. t;:i; . e: a t r ar1 *3. t'! „, 7ql ..;, . ; f , +,, _ tR r : rC.t ' } -, it-; ' . i' i K -' t }y;,y-. Y ;` ( *' ' • 1+ r1 ys- . iyaa '\ frfA rc' l r , j • 1 5 1 qty u jY I•C^' '! w C' ` • it . L . ti' ' 1 •' 'Q i!1 '.. ,/I' . . 11' lrct } .ir ' j . • s p Sr i4\ s YJI 1 ,i .n . ' C .2 " i ` 7 t ,r yN, j..+ J. ', .j 1'x+. } t r, ;, 2 /fl1 s isi• I•..1 . Appendix C EDR Report The EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck° 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Inquiry Number: 359034.1s April 15,1999 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. an.:. edr-company The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary------------------------------------------------------- ES1 Topographic Map--------------------------------------------------------- 2 GeoCheckSummary ------------------------------------------------------ 3 Overview Map----------------------------------------------------------- 5 DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Map Summary - All Sites--------------------------------------------------- 7 Map Summary - Sites with higher or the same elevation as the Target Property--------- 8 MapFindings------------------------------------------------ 9 Orphan Summary-- ------------------------------------ 40 APPENDICES GeoCheck Version 2.1 ----------------------------------------------------- Al Government Records Searched / Data Currency Tracking Addendum- - - - _ _ A13 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer and Other Information This Report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources and Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) makes no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, reliability, quality, suitability, or completeness of said information or the information contained in this report. The customer shall assume full responsibility for the use of this report. NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, SHALL APPLY AND EDR SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF SUCH WARRANTIES. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. COPYRIGHT (C) 1998 BY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks used herein are the property of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. TC359034.1s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-97. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. The address of the subject property for which the search was intended is 22120 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the subject property or within the ASTM E 1527-97 search radius around the subject property for the following Databases: NPL:_________________________ National Priority List Delisted NPL:________________ NPL Deletions RCRIS-TSD:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System AWP: -------------- AWP CHMIRS:_____________________ California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Toxic Pits:___________________ Toxic Pits CERCLIS:____________________ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP:--------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System SWF/LF:--------------------- State Landfill UST:_________________________ Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database Ca. FID:______________________ CA FID AST:_________________________ Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities RAATS:---------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System WMUDS:--------------------- WMUDS/ SWAT RCRIS-SOG:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LOG:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System HMIRS:______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System PADS:_______________________ PCB Activity Database System ERNS: ----------------------- Emergency Response Notification System FINDS:_______________________ Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report TRIS: ------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA: ------------------------ Toxic Substances Control Act MLTS:------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System NPL Lien:____________________ NPL Liens Ca. BEP:_____________________ CA Bond Exp. Plan ROD:------------------------- ROD CONSENT____________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Ca. WDS:-------------------- CA WDS S Bay Reg. 2:________________ South Bay Region 2 Coal Gas:____________________ Former Manufactured gas (Coal Gas) Sites. Unmapped (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. Search Results: Search results for the subject property and the search radius, are listed below: Subject Property: The subject property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Surrounding Properties: Elevations have been determined from the USGS 1 degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. EDR's definition of a site with an elevation equal to the subject property includes a tolerance of -10 feet. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the subject property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the subject property (by more than 10 feet). Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. CAL -SITES: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. A review of the Cal -Sites list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Cal -Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM CORP 23333 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/2 - 1 W 19 34 NOTIFY 65: Notify 65 records contain facility notifications about any release that could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Proposition 65 database. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page ARCO SERVICE STATION #6182 10121 NORTH FOOTHILL BO 1/4 - 1/2W 11 22 CORTESE: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with LISTS having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information. A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 Cortese sites within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM CORP Lower Elevation MEASUREX ANNEX Address 23333 STEVENS CREEK BLV Address 10120 IMPERIAL AVE Dist / Dir Map ID Page 112-1 W 19 34 Dist / Dir Map ID Page 1/4 - 112ESE F16 31 TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally -defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/01/1998 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Lower Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page ZILOG INC 10460 BUBB RD 1/2 - 1 ESE 18 33 LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/31/1999 has revealed that there are 11 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page FACCIOLA RESIDENCE 22371 CUPERTINO RD 1/8 - 1/4 W A2 9 DENNIS HALL PROPERTY 10104 BYRNE AVE 1/8 - 1/4 ESE B4 13 DENNIS HALL PROPERTY 10104 BYRNE AVE 1/8 - 1/4 ESE B5 15 MOBIL SERVICE STATION 22510 STEVENS CREEK BL, 1/4 - 1/2W 8 16 ARCO 10121 N FOOTHILL BLVD 1/4 - 1/2W D9 19 ARCO #6182 10121 N FOOTHILL BLVD 1/4 - 1/2W D10 22 Lower Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/4 - 1/2 E E12 23 US POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/4 - 1/2E E13 23 HIGDON, ALLEY, KOLB 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE 1/4 - 1/2E 14 27 MEASUREZ CORPORATION 10120 IMPERIAL AVE 1/4 - 1/2 ESE F15 30 MEASUREX CORPORATION 10120 IMPERIAL AVE 1/4 - 1/2 ESE F17 33 HAZNET: The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000, 000 annually, representing approximately 350, 000-500,000 shipments. Data from non -California manifests & continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, & disposal method. The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control is the agency A review of the HAZNET list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 HAZNET sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page DAN FACCIOLA LYNN MARKEY Lower Elevation 22371 CUPERTINO RD 10066 BYRNE AVE Address 1/8 - 1/4W Al 9 1/8- 1/4 ESE 3 12 Dist / Dir Map ID Page CLARKS AUTO PARTS & MACHINE 21881 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/8 - 1/4E C6 15 CLARKS AUTO PARTS & MACHINE 21881 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/8 - 1/4E C7 15 TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the CA SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CA SLIC site within approximately 0.5 miles of the subject property. Lower Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page US POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 114 - 112E E13 23 TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name RANCHO SERVICE CENTER TEXACO DONEERVYN'S ARCO SERVICE STATION #495, AT 10550 DEANZA BLVD., ARCO STN #495/10550 DEANZA BLVD STEVENS CREEK(DUMPING LOCATION) KAISER ALUMINU 23333 STEVENS KAISER CEMENT CORP PERMANENTE Database(s) LUST UST HAZNET ERNS ERNS ERNS FINDS S Bay Reg. 2,CA SLIC TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 359034.1s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. Major Roads Contour Lines Waterways Earthquake Fault Lines Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater Closest Federal Well in quadrant Closest State Well in quadrant Closest Public Water Supply Well 0 1/ 2 1 2 Miles Closest Hydrogeological Data i Oil, gas or related wells TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 /122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:41 am GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 37.322620 - 37° 19'21.4" Longitude (West): 122.060852 - 122° 3' 39.1" Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 10 UTM X (Meters): 583210.6 UTM Y (Meters): 4130872.0 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE Target Property: GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATIONt Geologic Code: Era: System: Series: ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNITt Category: GROUNDWATER FLOW INFORMATION 2437122-C1 CUPERTINO, CA Tpc Cenozoic Tertiary Pliocene Continental Deposits Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. if such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including well data collected on nearby properties, regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers), or surface topography.t AQUIFLOWr"** Search Radius: 2.000 Miles DISTANCE DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP FROM TP Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW General Topographic Gradient at Target Property: General NNE General Hydrogeologic Gradient at Target Property: No hydrogeologic data available. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data*: Search Radius: 2.0 miles Status: Not found FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION WELL DISTANCE QUADRANT FROM TP Northern >2 Miles STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION WELL DISTANCE QUADRANT FROM TP Northern 1/2 - 1 Mile Eastern 1 - 2 Miles Southern 1/4 - 1/2 Mile. Western 1 - 2 Miles STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION API # DISTANCE FROM TP LITHOLOGY Not Reported DEPTH TO WATER TABLE Not Reported NO WELLS FOUND t Source: P. G. Schrubem, R. E. Amdt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U. S. at 1: 2,500,000 Scale -A digital representation of the 1974 P. B. King and H. M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). U. S. EPA Ground Water Handbook, Vol I: Ground Water and Contamination, Office of Research and development EPA/625/6-90/016a,Chapter 4, page 78, September 1990. EDR AOUIFLOWTv information System of hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow directions at specific locations. See the date pages at the end of this report for a complete description. TC359034.1s Page 3 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 SUMMARY PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION Searched by Nearest PWS. NOTE: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. PWS Name: CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Location Relative to TP: 1 - 2 Miles East PWS currently has or has had major violation(s): No AREA RADON INFORMATION EPA Radon Zone for SANTA CLARA County: 2 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Zip Code: 95014 Number of sites tested: 3 Area Average Activity 4 pCi/L 4-20 pCi/L 20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor 0.267 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC359034.1s Page 4 OVERVIEW MAP - 359034.1 s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. Target Property o 1 a 1n 1 Yves 1 Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than Power transmission lines the target property Oil & Gas pipelines A Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) 77,71 100 -year flood zone T-77 National Priority List Sites 500 -year flood zone Landfill Sites TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 /122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:39 am w • mow w www. w w _ _ _ ___ n m_ffi__ I___ Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) X Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites El Landfill Sites 0 1/16 1113 114 Miles Power transmission lines d= a Oil & Gas pipelines 0 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 /122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:40 am GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 ADDENDUM FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION BASIC WELL DATA Site ID: Site Type: Year Constructed: Altitude: Well Depth: Depth to Water Table: Date Measured: LITHOLOGIC DATA Not Reported WATER LEVEL VARIABILITY Water Level: 283.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/69 Water Level: 298.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/69 Water Level: 265.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/70 Water Level: 277.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/70 Water Level: 255.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/28/71 Water Level: 266.00 ft. Date Measured: 08/01/71 Water Level: 250.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/01/71 Water Level: 259.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/72 Water Level: 255.00 ft. Date Measured: 01/ 01/73 Water Level: 260.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01!73 Water Level: 218.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/74 Water Level: 198.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/30/74 Water Level: 194.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/75 Water Level: 216.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/76 Water Level: 214.90 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/77 Water Level: 204.10 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/78 Water Level: 184.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/79 Water Level: 208.30 ft. Date Measured: 12/31/81 Water Level: 192. 90 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/83 Well Closest to Target Property (Northern Quadrant) 372130122042301 Distance from TP: 2 Miles Single well, other than collector or Ranney type 280.00 ft. Not Reported County: Santa Clara 189.00 ft. State: California 640.00 ft. Topographic Setting: Valley flat Not Reported Prim. Use of Site: Withdrawal of water Not Reported Prim. Use of Water: Public supply Water Level: 287.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/69 Water Level: 280.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/69 Water Level: 159.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/70 Water Level: 267.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/70 Water Level: 256.00 ft. Date Measured: 04/01/ 71 Water Level: 270.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/71 Water Level: 240.00 ft. Date Measured: 01/01/72 Water Level: 277.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/72 Water Level: 240.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/73 Water Level: 248.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/73 Water Level: 217.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/ 25/ 74 Water Level: 195.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/28/ 75 Water Level: 195.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/28/ 75 Water Level: 190.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/77 Water Level: 201.10 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/77 Water Level: 206.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/12/78 Water Level: 189.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/01/79 Water Level: 202.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/01/82 Water Level: 165.02 ft. Date Measured: 01/ 01/84 Water Level: 290.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/69 Water Level: 274.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/01/69 Water Level: 269.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/70 Water Level: 254.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/31/70 Water Level: 254.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/71 Water Level: 267.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/01/71 Water Level: 241.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/72 Water Level: 279.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/72 Water Level: 266.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/73 Water Level: 133. 00 ft. Date Measured: 01/02/ 74 Water Level: 216.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/74 Water Level: 195. 00 ft. Date Measured: 04/ 30/ 75 Water Level: 184.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/28/ 75 Water Level: 190.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/77 Water Level: 194.90 ft. Date Measured: 01/01/78 Water Level: 208.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/78 Water Level: 212.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/79 Water Level: 183. 00 ft. Date Measured: 12/29/ 82 Water Level: 303.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/69 Water Level: 268.00 ft. Date Measured: 01/ 01/70 Water Level: 275.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/70 Water Level: 250.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/71 Water Level: 255.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/01/71 Water Level: 260.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/71 Water Level: 241.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/72 Water Level: 258.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/31/72 Water Level: 270.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/73 Water Level: 131.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/74 Water Level: 214.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/74 Water Level: 214.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/30/ 75 Water Level: 179. 00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/76 Water Level: 189.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/01/77 Water Level: 193. 90 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/78 Water Level: 186. 00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/79 Water Level: 240.10 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/81 Water Level: 175. 90 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/83 TC359034.1s Page Al Water Wells: GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Well Within 1/2 - 1 Mile of Target Property (Northern Quadrant) Water System Information: Prime Station Code: E43/018-SCVWDMA FRDS Number Number: 4310018005 District Number: 05 Water Type: Surface Water Source Lat/Long: 371945.0 1220324.8 Source Name: SCVWD - MANN CONNECTION System Number: 4310018 System Name: City of Cupertino Organization That Operates System: Precision: 10300 TORRE AVE Source Name: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Pop Served: 18200 Area Served: CUPERTINO Water System Information: User ID: HEN County: Santa Clara Station Type: RESVR/CANAUAMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Well Status: Combined Treated Precision: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Connections: 4199 Well Within 1 - 2 Miles of Target Property (Eastern Quadrant) Prime Station Code: 07S/02W-13C01 M User ID: HEN FRDS Number Number: 431 0001 01 5 County: Santa Clara District Number: 05 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT/MU N/I NTAKE/SU P PLY Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/Long: 372000.0 1220200.0 Precision: Undefined Source Name: WELL 024-01 System Number: 4310001 System Name: CWSC Los Altos Suburban Organization That Operates System: 949 B Street Los Altos, CA 94024 Pop Served: 53940 Connections: 17895 Area Served: LOS ALTOS Sample Information: * Only Findings Above Detection Level Are Listed Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 680.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 7.310 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 247.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 300.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 400 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 140 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE TC359034.1s Page A2 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 280. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 72.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 24.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 720 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 1.300 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 33.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 6.000 UG/L Chemical: LITHIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 020 UG/L Chemical: FOAMING AGENTS (MBAS) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 383.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 120 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 20.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 005 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 060 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 20.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 660. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 7.410 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 249.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 303.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 500 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 190 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 264.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) TC359034.1s Page A3 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 55.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 31.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 36.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 960 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 900 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 29.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 160 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 39.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 160.000 UG/L Chemical: BARIUM Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 10.000 UG/L Chemical: LITHIUM Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 387.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 140 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 15.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 017 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 150 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 20.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 2.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 640.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 7.300 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 257.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 312.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 400 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 190 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE TC359034.1s Page A4 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 262.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 57.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 29.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 42.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 1.130 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 180 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 26.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 388.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 060 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 14.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 016 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 300 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 3.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 670.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 7.450 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 265.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 322.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 170 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 263.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) TC359034.1s Page A5 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 60.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 27.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 43.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 1.150 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 39.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 190 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 411.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 250 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 16.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 018 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 100 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 1.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 670. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 7.450 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 237.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 288.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 140 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 277.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 64.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM TC359034.1s Page A6 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 29.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 760 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 34.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 170 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 382.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 100 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 17.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06/02/ 1988 Findings: 006 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 150 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 2.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 645.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 7.510 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 243. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 295.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 220 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 260.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 59.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 25.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM TC359034.1s Page A7 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 37.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 1.000 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 34. 000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 200 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 34. 000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 120.000 UG/L Chemical: BARIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 391.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 130 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX Q SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 17.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 007 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 300 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 04/08/1992 Findings: 2.500 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA Sample Collected: 04/08/1992 Findings: 1.300 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR Sample Collected: 03/22/1993 Findings: 7.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06/30/1994 Findings: 2.600 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA Sample Collected: 06/ 30/1994 Findings: 1.700 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 20.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 4.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 656. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 7.640 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 248.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 300. 000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY TC359034.1s Page A8 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 900 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 210 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 254.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 57.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 26.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 46.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 1.260 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 1.400 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 40.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 230 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 134.000 UG/L Chemical: BARIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 404.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 280 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 16.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 021 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 150 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 01/20/1995 Findings: 3.400 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA Sample Collected: 01/20/1995 Findings: 2.000 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR Sample Collected: 03/ 07/1995 Findings: 17.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03/ 26/1996 Findings: 14.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 5.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR TC359034.1s Page A9 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 567. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 7.480 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 236. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 287.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 100 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 282.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 64.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 27.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 31.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 31.000 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 1.600 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 41.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 130 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 150.000 UG/L Chemical: IRON Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 12.000 UG/L Chemical: NICKEL Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 56.000 UG/L Chemical: ALUMINUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 382. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 129 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 14.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 600 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) TC359034.1s Page A10 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Well Within 1/4 - 1/2 Mile of Target Property (Southern Quadrant) Water System Information: Prime Station Code: 07S/02W-15R01 M User ID: 43C FRDS Number Number: 4300751001 County: Santa Clara District Number: 73 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/Long: 371905.0 1220319.0 Precision: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Source Name: WELL 01 System Number: System Number: 4300751 System Name: System Name: BLACKBERRY FARMS Organization That Operates System: Organization That Operates System: 298 GARDEN HILL DR. 21975 SAN FERNANDO AVE. LOS GATOS, CA 95030 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Pop Served: Pop Served: 3600 Connections: 1 Area Served: Not Reported Sample Information: * Only Findings Above Detection Level Are Listed Sample Collected: 09/ 25/ 1986 Findings: 1.600 UG/L Chemical: CHLOROFORM (THM) Sample Collected: 10/24/1986 Findings: 760 UG/L Chemical: CHLOROFORM (THM) Sample Collected: 04/06/1987 Findings: 850 UG/L Chemical: CHLOROFORM (THM) Well Within 1 - 2 Miles of Target Property (Western Quadrant) Water System Information: Prime Station Code: 07S/02W-09Q11 M User ID: HEN FRDS Number Number: 4300812001 County: Santa Clara District Number: 05 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/Long: 371954.0 1220506.0 Precision: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Source Name: WELL 01 System Number: 4300812 System Name: SCC P&R, Rancho San Antonio Organization That Operates System: 298 GARDEN HILL DR. LOS GATOS, CA 95030 Pop Served: 40 Connections: 1 Area Served: RANCHO SAN ANTONIO COUNTY PARK TC359034.1s Page A11 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION Searched by Nearest PWS PWS SUMMARY: PWS ID: CA4310018 PWS Status: Active Distance from TP: 1 - 2 Miles Date Initiated: June / 1977 Date Deactivated: Not Reported Dir relative to TP: East PWS Name: CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Addressee / Facility: Not Reported Facility Latitude: 371923 Facility Longitude: 122 01 51 City Served: CUPERTINO Treatment Class: Mixed (treated and untreated) Population Served: 10,001 - 50,000 Persons PWS currently has or has had major violation(s): No TC359034.1s Page Al2 Appendix D Environmental Agency Information Requested and Obatined CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consuRing One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 16, 1999 Ms. Teresa Lee Bay Area Air Quality Management District Public Information 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Lee: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any air emission complaints or permits on file with your agency for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. OC D Andria Pomponi Staff Planner O:\US ERS\POM P.QNI\CUPERT— I \FOIA. W PD Bay Area Air Quality Management District 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Attention: Public Records Administration Division FAx. (415) 749-5911 California Public Records Act Request Name of Company Requesting Records: Date: C - N r r _- in Address . L r L -ti- r . ve . . Y e C i n 1 u- (4V5/ Zhu odd Who shoa!d we call if we have a question? Qts Contact: Po N[ , b Telephone: ci Please complete one copy of the back of this form for each facility or site for which you are requesting records, and mail or fax to the address shown above. Within 10 calendar days of receiving your request, we will fill your request, or you will be advised of the reason we are unable to fill it. If you have questions, please call (415) 749-4784 for record request assistance. The following are not considered public records: Any trade secret so designated by a permitted facility. Any complainant's name or address. Any record pertaining to personnel names or fiscal files subject to audit. District publications or subscriptions available by fee (including selected computer compilation printouts, as listed on "Record Request Form" and provided only as public information). Any non-specific record (i.e., requested without facility name or other identification). REPLY TO YOUR PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST Enclosed are the records you requested. We have located the records you requested and they exceed the number of pages which the District provides at no charge. The cost is $ for pages at $0.10 per page. The records will be forwarded upon receipt of the amount due. Please make your check or money order payable to BAAQMD. Your check should reference Invoice Number and should be sent to: Business Office Bay Area Air Quality Management District 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 q We are unable to provide the records you requested. S &ck ire ;s x]' A search was made but no records were found. I a c situ z ns Cc e2 -+L r itio CA( ] A search was made but the requested item is not ava"[ a&e becau6e it is not a public record. We are unable to find the record you requested because the request did not include sufficient information to find it. G:IRDWIPRAI.doc --11/26/96 CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center l engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 20, 1999 Will Bruhns Public Assistance Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region 1515 Clay Street, #1400 Oakland, California 94612 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Mr. Bruhns: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation on file with your agency for the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Mobile Service Station Zilog Inc. 22510 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10460 Bubb Road Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Kaiser Alumninum & Chemical 23333 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA_ 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Kaiser Cement Corp. 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. ax4u ° Andria Pomponi Staff Planner O:\USERS\POM PONI\CUPERT- I \FOIA. W PD STATE OF CALIFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY GEORGE DEUKME)IAN, Govemor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 2151 BERKELEY WAY BERKELEY, CA 94704 April 8, CAUFORN1A REGjoNA1 WATFR APR 13 Mr. Phil Bobel, Chief QUALM CONTROL BOARDWasteManagementSection US EPA Region IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94132 Dear Mr. Bobel: This letter is to request your concurrence with this Department's intention to issue a public notice and accept public comment regarding closure of the Zilog, Inc. facility which was located at 10640 Bubb Road, Cupertino, California. The Department has determined that the Zilog facility was closed in a manner consistent with Title 22, California Administrative Code, and that said closure was certified by the facility operator and an engineer duly registered to practice in the State of California. Based on information available at this time, the Department of Health has further determined that no contamination resultingfromZilog's activities remains at the site. There are, however, small concentrations of residual contaminants of uncertain origin in the soil. The Department therefore is proposing to permit closure of the Zilcg facility, with no requirement for Zilog to pursue additional closure or post closure activities at this time. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Daniel E. Murphy at (415) 540-2043. Since- ly, Dwi ht R Hoenig, Chief North Coast California Section Toxic Substances Control Division cc: Roger James, RWQCB-SF Debbie Johnson, EPA DRH:dem:na iTATE OF CALIFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gov,mor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION 2151 BERKELEY WAY, ANNEX 7 BERKELEY, CA 94704 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Pirooz Lahij i Director of Facilities Zilog Corporation 210 Hacienda Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Lahiji: October 13, 1988 ALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER OCT 18 QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ZILOG FACILITY, 10640 BUBB ROAD, CUPERTINO, EPA ID NO. CAD 076314459 We have received the engineer's certification that your facility has been closed in accordance with your approved closure plan. This letter is your acknowledgement that the Department now considers the Zilog hazardous waste storage facility, EPA ID No. CAD 076314459 officially closed. Please beadvised that this acknowledgement of facility closure is not a certification that your facility does not pose any environmental -or public health threat. This letter does not remove any liabilities associated with the past hazardous waste management practices which occurred on the site. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Daniel E. Murphy at (415) 540-3545. Sincerely, DwiAt. /Hoenig,Chi Region 2 Toxic Substances Control Division Cert. Mail No. P 888 746 057 cc: Christy Camp, U.S. EPA -Region IX Steve Ritchie, SF Bay-RWQCB DRH:DEM:re CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 20, 1999 Jeanette Townsend Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, CA 95118 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Townsend: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency for the following sites. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Kaiser Cement Corporation 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regardine, this matter, please call me at (925) 296- 8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. a Andria Pomponi Staff Planner STATE OF CALIFORNIA lofts CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD PE -E vrI:SGN SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION 2101 WEBSTER STREET Suite Soo i OAKLAND CA 94612 Tel. 15101 286.1255 FAx 15101286.1361) December 21. 1995 File No. 2188.20 (JRW10H.) Mr. Phil Gaynor tic ,C RB File No 43-1860 Kaiser Cement Corporation 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard ' Cupertino, CA 95014 I i Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certificate for 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Cupertino, CA Dear Mr. Gaynor. This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage tanks formerly located at the location described above. Enclosed Is the Case ClosureSummaryforthereferencedsiteforyourrecords. Based upon the available information, including the current land use. and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions. no furtheractionrelatedtotheundergroundtankreleaseisrequired This notice is issued pursuant to a regulation contained in Title 23. California Code of Regulations. Division 3. Chapter 16, Section 2721(e). If a change in land use is proposed. the owner must promptly notify this agency Please contact John West at (510) 286-1247 or Logan Hansen at (510) 286-6733 if you have anyquestionsregardingthismatter Attachment: Case Closure Summary cc w/attch: James Crowley, SCVWD Jim Blarney, SCCDEH Sincerely, Loretta K. Barsamian Executive Officer Z'; Stephen I. Morse Chief, Toxics Division i r SITE CLOSURE SUNLMARY ^ I. AGENCY INFORMATION Date De.emhcr 21. 149s AFencs lame S F B R W Q C B .Address 2101 Webster Street City State Zip Oakland- CA 94612 PMmc 1510) 286.1255 Responsible Staff Person John R West. U,gan Hansen Title Ensironmenul Specialist III Student Intern Il. SITE LN -FORMATION Site Facihn Name Kaiser Cement Corporation. Scrvi;c Sution Site Facility Address 24MI Stevens Creek Boulevard. Cuperiino. CA 95013 RB SMS Case No 33-1660 Lucal or LOP Cax No Pnpnn 1132 I URF Filing Date 2'22 9.1 SWEEPS No Responsihle Partie, nncludc addre,ws and Phone numbers- Phil Gaynor Kaiser Cement Corparauon 23001 Snscns Creek Bpuleyard. Cu rnn,. CA 95111. I Ph. (408) 996-4266 Tank No. Size in Gallons Contents Closed In—Place'Removed'. I Date 1 10.000 Diesel Rcmoscd I 11 ID 9- I 10.0110 Gasuhnc Removed IO.O(K) Gau+hne Remosed I! Ib 91 111_ RELEASE AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION INTORSIATION Cau,e and Tspe of Release Unknown Site characterization complete' Yes Date Approved By Oyersi ht Aeencc Monitoring wrils installed' No Number Proper crecned mmnal' Highest GW Depth Below Ground Surface. Lowest Depth Flow Direction cost Sensitive Current Use. Most Sensitive Potential Use and Probabiliry of Use Are drinking water wcl!, affected' Aquifer lame Is surface water affected' Nearest Affected SW Name Off -Site Bcnefi:ial Use Impacts (Addresses Locations)' Reponisi on file' 1'es Where is rerKlrtm filed' S FR W Q C B r- nrr, Y wr., 1 IV. CLOSURE Due, e0m ICiCJ ;arrnusc anon Protea evsane henclmal uses per the Rcemnal Hoard Ba,m Plan' Y., Dues compicicJ :orre,u,c a, tion protea potential heneli,ial u,e, r, the Rerwnai h—rJ Ha,m Pl.ir.' 1 e Does curretuse action prvtcct puhhi health for current land usc' Yc, II I Site Manaeenient RegwrcmcnL No s ectal re uirement% I Monitoring Wells De,ommss)oned N A \umber Decummi%,wned ur..hcr Rct.,incd List Enforcement Acnnns Taken None taken List Enforcement Axiom Rescinded None rcxmdc l TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF .AFFECTED MATERIA!. Material Amount (Include Units) Action (Treatment or Disposal —Destination) j Date Tank 1 10.(Xt0 Callon Removed and di%posed (Iucatton unkn,,wm I I I v, Tank '_ 10.0kW) calion Remoscd and disfx,wd dc>`auun unknowm l l IS" Tank i IU.(XV Callan Remmed and ds )scd (location uni:now-n) j 11 Ih tai Piping Unknown Removed and dispsiscd docauon unknowm 11 Ih 9i I ki.AXI%IU%l DO''CMENTED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS—B[FORE AND AFTER CLLANI'P POLLl7A.\7 Soil (ppm) Before Atter Nater (ppb) Soil (ppm) POLLIT.\7 Before After Before After t Nater ( phi iBeforeAfter TPH )Gas) 22 NA' N A• N A Xsl= u' NAcnr N A N A i TPH iDinelr U V \ A \ A EN\Ihcntrne NA I N Bctucnr 5' N A N A N A 0)I S Grca,c N\ NA j N Toluene h' NA N A N A Hca,s sicuis NA NA N A i I Comments (Depth of Remediation- etc.): am Ie taken from ,io:kpilc of o,creicasated sml tram tank Pit I ND= Nun-dctc.t \A= A= Not aprI),ahlc I IV. CLOSURE Due, e0m ICiCJ ;arrnusc anon Protea evsane henclmal uses per the Rcemnal Hoard Ba,m Plan' Y., Dues compicicJ :orre,u, c a,tion protea potential heneli,ial u,e, r, the Rerwnai h—rJ Ha,m Pl.ir.' 1 e Does curretuse action prvtcct puhhi health for current land usc' Yc, II I Site Manaeenient RegwrcmcnL No s ectal re uirement% I Monitoring Wells De,ommss)oned N A \umber Decummi%,wned ur..hcr Rct.,incd List Enforcement Acnnns Taken None taken List Enforcement Axiom Rescinded None rcxmdc l I V. TECHNICAL REPORT CORRESPONDENCE ETC..MAT Tiffs L. ,SURE RECO%INIENDATION AAS BASED L'PON Title: Sampling Repon, Sequoia Analytical 11 19 91 Uinuthorized Release Form ]'_'Ga vI. ADDITIONAL CO\OIENTS, DATA. ETC. PLLASL IACLLDE ATTACH THE rot LOW DA AS APMOMIATL I-SrI 4AP 1%O 41`1w TA%A Mr UA AT"O%MO TMI. WELL LIX AT— D.I, I ADw 1711 LMAMt-T 17f .. Sri r(.fuSwOATHNOtMTIrt L G AIILA OF I SIDLA A)Lt:"H ;1 r 11P. ArL DLI_ .171, P. 1'' On Nosemher 19.1993. three IO.M1 Fallon Underground Stange Tanks IUSTsi. one used to hold diesel and twos used to hold gasoline were closed and removed from the subject site Nicole Jakahy, of the Sanu Clara County Envi,onmental Health Department was present to observe removal and sampling Two, wnl sample, were Lakcn from heneath each CST pit and three composite samples of the stockpiled soils were Laken Anal\srs of the samples taken from hencath the tanks resulted in a maximum conccintranon of one part(+" per million Ippm) for Total Petroleum H%drozatte,n% ITPNI The stockpile samples had a maximum lysyl of TPH at ]_ ppm Benzene. Toluene. Ethylbenzene. and Xylene (BTEX) concentrations were well below one ppm or not detected in all samples Conclusion Regional Board Suit re.,,mmend the cxc lar closure sm:e only minor IcsclA o11 TPN were klund :n the sod samples from the tank pit and residual podluwm ,lac% not appear to posy a threat it, water qualm ,or human health and safes 7 C' f fes-' CO 2 ti This document and the related CASE CLOSURE LETTER. shall he retained Is, the lead agen:y as pan oMe off": — _ sue file fV m Jf^ v .r h1 ® 1 r, V 64Mp Tye . yy,' Liry HC e March 2, 1999 Mr. Earl Bouse Hanson Peramente Cement P.O. Box 309 3000 Busch Road Pleasanton, CA 94566 Dear Mr. Bouse: Subject. Fuel Leak Investigation at Kaiser Cement, 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA Per our February 26, 1999, telephone conversation, I am forwarding to you a copy of the Santa Clara Valley Water District (District's) February 7, 1997, letter and additional information. The staff at California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) closed the portion of this case that involves gasoline tanks (Upper Service Station). The remaining source areas to be addressed are listed below and documented in our enclosed letter. Please prepare and submit a work plan to define the extent of contamination in the Lower Service Station and Emergency Generator areas. TECHNICAL COMMENTS 1. There are five former source areas at this site: Lower Service Station Emergency Generator Garage Oil House Upper Service Station 2. Lower Service Station Area Prepare a work plan to define the extent of soil and groundwater pollution associated with four removed 1,000 gallon diesel tanks. Following tank removal, reportedly floating product was observed on water in the tank pit and excavated soils contained strong diesel fuel odors. Reportedly, no samples were collected from this area and the excavation was backfilled. Emergency Generator Area Define the extent of soil and groundwater pollution associated with one removed 4,000 gallon diesel tank. Following tank removal, reportedly the tank appeared undamaged with no apparent leaks, but the associated connecting lines and plumbing showed obvious leakage. Excavated soils contained diesel odors and the excavation contained product. No samples were collected and the excavation was backfilled. 4. Garage and Oil House Areas No further work is necessary. Mr. Earl Bouse 2 March 2, 1999 Upper Service Station Area No further work is necessary; The RWQCB granted closure for this area December 21, 1995. However, if you are no long utilizing the groundwater monitoring wells installed in this area, you should properly abandon them. Contact Mr, Dave Zozaya in the District's Well Services Unit, 408) 927-0710, extension 2650. It appears that three groundwater monitoring wells were installed near the existing underground storage tanks. 6. Because closure has been granted for the only gasoline tanks at your site, it is not necessary to repeat the analyses for fuel oxygenates in your next investigation. However, it will be necessary to analyze soil and groundwater samples for the gasoline additive Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE), and to report the analytical results in your data tables, as well as include the laboratory analytical results for all samples analyzed If analytical results for samples yield positive results under method 8020, we suggest you use confirmation analyses, with analytical method 8260 or comparable, to confirm the presence of MTBE at your site. A typical way of defining the extent of contamination near and in former source areas is to install soil borings and to collect soil and groundwater samples for analysis, at depth intervals of 5 feet and at significant lithologic breaks. In order to define the vertical extent of contamination, it is necessary to collect samples until either: you reach groundwater and collect a grab groundwater sample for analysis, or obtain non-detectable analytical results for petroleum hydrocarbon contamination to a significant depth in the soil. In order to define the lateral extent of contamination, it is necessary to install borings laterally from the source areas until analytical results for samples indicate significant contaminant attenuation with distance from the source area. REQUEST Prepare a work plan to address comments 1 and 2 above, due no later than April 16, 1999. This request is made pursuant to the Regional Water Quality Control Board's authority under Section 13267 of the California Water Code. If you have any questions, please call me at (408) 265-2607, extension 2639. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Adele R Shepherd Water Quality Specialist Leaking Underground Storage Tank Oversight Program Enclosures cc/enc: A. Shepherd cc: D. Zozaya PT:gs:FL03 01 g L CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 20, 1999 Freedom of Information Act Contact California Environmental Protection Agency 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 525 Sacramento, CA 95814 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Freedom of Information Act Contact: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency for the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Facciolo Property Lynn Markey Property 22371 Cupertino Road 10066 Bryne Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Clark Auto Parts & Machine Measurex Annex 21881 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10120 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. amotuo Andria Pomponi Staff Planner V w. u. 4 California Environmental Protection Agency m Air Resources Board a Department of Pesticide Regulation • Department of Toxic Substances Control Integrated Waste Management Board • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Winston H. Hickoz State Water Resources Control Board a Regional Water Quality Control Boards Gray DavisSecretaryforGovernor nvironmental rotection April 28, 1999 Ms. Andria Pomponi Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. One Walnut Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Pomponi: We have received your letter requesting information dated April 20, 1999, regarding "any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency ..." as stated in your letter. After reviewing the files of the Office of the Secretary, no records relevant to your request were discovered. You may wish to contact one or more of our constituent entities regarding your request individually to determine if they have pertinent information. For your information, the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) consists of the following entities: Office .of the Secretary (to which your request was sent) Air Resources Board Department of Pesticide Regulations Department of Toxic Substances Control Integrated Waste Management Board Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment State Water Resources Control Board Regional Water Quality Control Boards I have enclosed a list of contacts for public records requests at each Board, Department, and Office within Cal/EPA. If you have any questions regarding the Office of the Secretary, please contact me at (916) 327-2064. Sincerely, L19's F. Brown Acting Deputy Secretary for Law Enforcement and Counsel Enclosure 555 Capitol Mall a Suite 525 a Sacramento, California 95814 0 (916) 445-3846 a Fax: (916) 445-6401 Printed on Recycled Paper r_ CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 16, 1999 Mr. Donald White Freedom of Information Act Officer United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region IX Office of Public Affairs 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request via fax: 415-744-1605 I Dear Mr. White: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information in your files for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. Andria Pomponi Staff Planner 0:\USERS\POM P.ONI\C UPERT- I \FOIA. W PD UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Z = REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105.3901 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Freedom of Information Act RIN-9- /S - J / Your Reference: / ,, 0 (_r P l The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) -database lists those regulated facilities that have notified EPA as hazardous waste generators, transporters or treatment, storage or disposal facilities under RCRA. This database may not contain all the potential hazardous waste s tes that exist or that are regulated by state and local agencies. Your request also has been sent to other appropriate divisions of EPA, who will answer you directly. The information you have requested is not in the EPA Region 9 RCRA L__- 1 database e_ or hardcopy files. If you consider this response to be a denial, you may appeal it by addressing your written appeal to the Freedom of Information Officer (A-101), United States Environmental Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20460. California, Arizona and Nevada are RCRA program in lieu of EPA and we appropriate state agency to request attached). COMMENTS: now authorized to conduct the suggest that you contact the up-to-date information (list If you have additional questions regarding your request, please contact Jacqueline Jennings, or Bridget Coyle, at (415) 744-2029. Si,1aqerejy BrVdgef jV(5yl'X, Section Chief FAX #: 415/744-1605 Data M' gem nt & Analysis I 1. Printed on Regrled Paper CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 30, 1999 Ron Baker External Affairs Department of Toxic Substances Control 10151 Croydon Way, Suite 3 Sacramento, CA 95827 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Mr. Baker: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency for the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Facciolo Property Lynn Markey Property 22371 Cupertino Road 10066 Bryne Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Clark Auto Parts & Machine Measurex Annex 21881 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10120 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. Gf 0- ; r7 Andria Pomponi Staff Planner O F F I C E 0 F' N I A 9 BOOK 357 9. 6.62 2 za NI 2 4r _` S2 mI 5/ 5 \ 4 ' 3 _ 1p -j -/00/2- J J T O N 23 m 3 2 6BK G 27 60 28 emn 9 9 0 5425 Cn Z Zo 5 55 25 75.12 O a1 23 4 n 00 l Qrn 56- 7 6, 2 JOK K 870 O.R. 1249 m P Q a4 o kz o Compiled in conformance with sec 327 of the 5 S R. k T. code. For assessment purposes only. E rNottve For Roy! Yec 19 9 8— 9 9 2 c` LAWRENCE E. STONE — ASSESSOR A T 6.62 2 za NI 2 4r _` S2 mI 5/ 5 \ 4 ' 3 _ 1p - j -/ 00/2- J J T O N 23 m 3 2 6BK G 27 60 28 emn 9 9 0 5425 Cn Z Zo 5 55 25 75.12 O a1 23 4 n 00 l Qrn 56- 7 6, 2 JOK K 870 O.R. 1249 m P Q a4 o kz o Compiled in conformance with sec 327 of the 5 S R. k T. code. For assessment purposes only. E rNottve For Roy! Yec 19 9 8— 9 9 2 c` LAWRENCE E. STONE — ASSESSOR CDMCatnp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting engineering construction operations One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 May 13, 1999 Bert Viskovich Director, Public Works Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Subject: Transmittal of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA Dear Mr. Viskovich: Enclosed please find two copies of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California subject property). This Phase I ESA assesses the subject property for recognized environmental conditions resulting from current or past uses of the subject property or activities at surrounding properties. If you have any questions or comments, please call us at 925-933-2900. Very Truly Yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. e 2v: XL' Randall T S mith,, P.E. Project Director encl. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California May 12, 1999 CDM Project No. 10886-25977 Prepared by: Andria Pornponi QROFESSIONq F2Reviewedby: 2 22C Rlo. C- 51180 EXP. tri a Randall 0mith, P.E. \ T r CIVk\- OF C P-\- Contents Section 1 Executive Summary .............................................. 1- 1 Section 2 Introduction.................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose ................................................. 2-1 2.2 Description of Work ........................................ 2-1 2.3 Limiting Conditions and Methodolgy Used ...................... 2- 2 Section 3 Property Description ............................................. 3-1 3.1 Location and Legal Description ............................... 3-1 3.2 Property and Vicinity Characteristics ........................... 3-1 3.3 Description of Structures and Other Improvements ............... 3-1 3.4 Current Uses of Property .................................... 3- 2 3.5 Past Uses of Property ...................................... 3- 2 3.6 Current and Past Uses of Adjoining Property .................... 3-3 Section 4 Records Review ................................................. 4-1 4.1 Databases Searched ....................................... 4-1 4.2 Database Search Results ................................... 4-2 4.3 Physical Setting ........................................... 4-8 Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews ................................. 5-1 5.1 Hazardous Substances ..................................... 5-1 5.2 Solid Waste/Non-Hazardous Waste ........................... 5-1 5.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls ................................... 5-1 5.4 Asbestos -Containing Materials ............................... 5-2 5.5 Air Quality ................................................ 5- 2 5. 6 Storage Tanks ............................................ 5- 2 5. 7 Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water .......................... 5-2 5.8 Herbicide and Pesticide Use ................................. 5-3 5. 9 Lead -Based Paint ......................................... 5-3 Section 6 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................. 6-1 Section 7 References, Contacts, and List of Acronyms Used ...................... 7-1 Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Information Reviewed Appendix C ED Report Appendix D Environmental Agency Information Requested and Obtained CDM Camp Dresser & McKee JACU PERTI MPHASE-NTOC. W PD Figure Contents continued) List of Figures Follows Page 3-1 Topographical Relief Map of Cupertino, California ........................... 3-1 3-2 Subject Property Site Plan .............................................. 3-1 4-1 EDR Overview Map ................................................... 4-1 Table List of Tables Follows Page 4-1 EDR Site Inventory .................................................... 4-1 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee JACUPERTI N\PHASE-1\TOC. W PD Section 1 Executive Summary Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) was contracted by the City of Cupertino Public Works Department to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California (referred to as the subject property). The subject property is owned jointly by relatives Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, Ms. Janet Trankle, Ms. Pam Stocklmeir, and Mr. Kurt Stocklmeir. The subject property has been owned by the Stocklmeir family since the early 1900s. The approximately five -acre subject property currently contains two rental residential units and a noncommercial orchard. This Phase I ESA was performed in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard designation E1527-97 with the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions' at the subject property. The results of the Phase I ESA were based upon information provided to CDM by Mr. Alan Stocklmeir (the most knowledgeable of the owners), review of pertinent historical documents, and observations specific to environmental conditions made by CDM during a site walkthrough of the subject property conducted on April 22, 1999. The subject property was assessed for recognized environmental conditions with respect to hazardous substances, solid waste/non-hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos - containing materials, air quality, storage tanks, water, wastewater, storm water, herbicide and pesticide use, and lead-based paint. During the site walkthrough, the subject property appeared to be well maintained. Based on CDM's site walkthrough, interviews, and review of site-specific information, there were no indications that prior or current use of the subject property has resulted in recognized environmental conditions. No evidence was discovered that would indicate that adjacent properties caused recognized environmental conditions at the subject property. However, due to the age of the structures at the subject property it is likely asbestos -containing material (ACM) and lead-based paints were used during construction and any renovations. The existence of friable and/or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. Prior to any renovation or demolition of the buildings at the subject property, CDM recommends a certified asbestos As used in ASTM E1527-97, "recognized environmental condition' means the following: The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicated an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies" (ASTM, 1997). CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-1 JACUPERT[ N\PHASE-I\SEC1. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Section 1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Executive Summary consultant conduct an asbestos survey of the buildings. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop building and one pump house. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead-based paint is minimal. In addition, the subject property served as a commercial orchard until the late 1960s. It is possible, although no evidence was fo-und during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement (i.e., spill during mixing or dilution and over application) of pesticides from uses associated with the orchard may have adversely impacted the subject property. The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. The orchard maintenance that occurs at the subject property could reduce the residual pesticides in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. Prior to any major disturbance of the soil at the subject property, CDM recommends collecting soil samples to determine the extent of impact, if any. Finally, one abandoned well exists at the eastern pump house in the southwest section of the subject property. If the well will no longer be used, CDM recommends properly destroying the well with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District. This Executive Summary is not intended to be read as a stand alone document. The reader should review the detailed information regarding each item in the following sections: Section 3, Property Description; Section 4, Records Review; and Section 5, Site Reconnaissance and Interviews. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1-2 JACUPERTIMPHASE-RSEM M Section 2 Introduction This section describes the purpose of the study and presents the scope of work as well as limitations to the investigation. 2.1 Purpose CDM was contracted by the City of Cupertino Public Works Department to perform a Phase I ESA of the subject property located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. 2.2 Description of Work CDM received written authorization to proceed on April 13, 1999 from Mr. Bert Viskovich of the City of Cupertino Public Works Department. Upon authorization to proceed, CDM arranged a site walkthrough of the subject property through Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, one of the owners of the subject property. On April 22,1999, CDM met with Mr. Stocklmeir at the subject property to discuss background information pertinent to the assessment of the subject property. After the meeting, CDM conducted a site walkthrough of the subject property, which consists of six buildings and an orchard of approximately 170 orange, walnut, and apricot trees. Mr. Stocklmeir accompanied CDM during the site walkthrough and provided information regarding the current and historical uses of the subject property. Observations made by CDM were noted and photographs of the subject property were taken during the site walkthrough. Select photographs of the subject property are provided in Appendix A. Appendix B contains information reviewed pertinent to the subject property. In addition, a search of federal, state, and local environmental databases was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The database search report provides information regarding any past or current hazardous waste disposal sites; reported petroleum or hazardous waste releases; listed hazardous waste generation, transportation, storage, or disposal facilities; listed solid waste disposal facilities; report leaking underground storage tanks; or listed underground storage tanks at the subject property and properties in the vicinity of the subject property. A copy of the EDR database report is provided in Appendix C. Cursory observations were made of surrounding properties listed in the EDR database during an drive-through survey of the area. During April 20 through May 5, 1999, various federal, state, and local environmental regulatory agencies were contacted as part of an investigation of the history of the subject property and to determine whether prior use of the subject property has resulted in recognized environmental conditions. Agency personnel were also questioned about the existence of recognized CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 2-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC2. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 2 Introduction environmental conditions in the vicinity of the subject property. Names and affiliations of persons contacted for information for this Phase I ESA and a list of information reviewed are provided in Section 7. Copies of information request letters sent to environmental regulatory agencies and subsequent responses are provided in Appendix D. 2.3 Limiting Conditions and Methodology Used The results of this Phase I ESA are based on interviews with environmental regulatory agency and subject property personnel, a walkthrough of the subject property, and a review of acquired environmental regulatory agency documents and subject property information. The conclusions, therefore, represent CDM's professional opinion based on these aforementioned sources of information. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Cupertino Public Works Department. It is not intended for use by other parties. If evidence of recognized environmental conditions are discovered based on CDM's review of information requested but not as yet provided, CDM will notify the City of Cupertino Public Works Department of these newly discovered issues. Therefore, is supplemental information warrants, CDM reserves the right to change conclusions and recommendations stated in this Phase I ESA. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 2- 2 J:\CUPERT1N\PHASE-RSEC2.WPD Section 3 Property Description 3.1 Location and Legal Description The subject property is located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, in southwest Santa Clara County. Figure 3-1, Topographical Relief Map of Cupertino, California, depicts the location of the subject property with respect to geographical features. The Assessor's parcel map was obtained from the Santa Clara County Assessor's Office. The subject property consists of Assessor's Parcel Number 357-09-053. The deed for this parcel, dated March 28, 1984, was obtained from the Santa Clara County Recorder's Office. Appendix B includes a copy of the parcel map and the deed. According to the deed, the legal description of subject property is as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Stevens Creek Road, as it formerly existed 40 feet wide, with the center line of Stevens Creek; thence in a general Southerly direction along the center line of Stevens Creek ... to a station designated D.S. 5 ... thence leaving the center line of Stevens Creek and running along the Eastery line of Monta Vista Park ... and along the Easterly line of Inspiration Point, Monta Vista ... to a pipe on said Southerly line of Stevens Creek Road; thence along said Southerly line of Stevens Creek Road ... to the point of beginning, containing 4.857 acres of land, more or less, and being a portion of the San Antonio Rancho, and being shown upon that certain map entitled, "Map of a survey made for Adelheid M. Stocklmeir in the San Antonio Ranch", which Map was filed for records in the office of the Recorder of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, on December 29, 1915, in Book "O" of Maps, page 88. 3.2 Property and Vicinity Characteristics The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stevens Creek in Cupertino, California. Stevens Creek borders the subject property on its east and south sides. Blackberry Farm Park, consisting of a golf course and picnic facilities, is located on the east side of the creek, south of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Residential housing is situated north and west of the subject property. A wooden fence lines the western boundary of the subject property, except for a short section that is a closed wrought iron gate. The gate leads to Dean Court, one of the private roadways adjacent to the subject property. Main access to the subject property is provided on the north side by a gravel driveway entering from Stevens Creek Boulevard. 3.3 Description of Structures and Other Improvements Eight structures are located on the subject property: a main residence, studio apartment with an attached garage, a shop building, two open-air garages, and three pump houses. Figure 3-2 presents the layout of the subject property. The main residence, the studio apartment, and the shop CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3-1 JACU P ERTI N\PHASE-I\S EC3. W PD AVE MORTON `- CJASCADELAr.*,, DRIVE 11 'a 0 i OREJ Grant utDALLFS F 7vzv--- -->--- ---- M ont_ r HELENA aliiey1. Sch 0 a EAD 260 perg In S R D*., V % H. 0 232 r rn.,itkr"i Z Mll M 1M.rylc oil nary e kv,/Ay Se L a D C- R l EAF 7 LILJ nbuostation- Jk J, -,, F z i Mw - 4 C ISCREEK RD DE ANZA PER A, V istaMoli COLLEGE r C if Cementceff, 0 CourSd 3 jtD j 15 3 a"i Linco S YCh JLL F 0 FT= A-- VJE pjjf It .enne.dy k, sar a 2' 4GravelPit' ater. 019 Gravel 77 pit ------ 0i -j 1=R ANE north Grave,) Pi F 7' I—BUBrzli1 0 2000= 1:: ftte-. 545 as/ t Feet SP, Y 311 P F P rr) i -ATI OA -- Source: U.S.G.S. 15' Quadrangle - Cupertino, CA 1980 Figure 3-1 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Topographic Relief Map of Cupertino, California xa JaSd CDM Camp Dresser & McKee j MInResidemuse ,--" SepticTankGaragelQ Open -Air l01, and Studio Garages \: S Shop Property Line sidences l ' I I Orchard 1 Area l I I rCf i i Property Line I' I Residences Pump i Houses El EIj // Figure 3- 2 Subject Property Site Plan 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California Cupertino Public Works Department Phase / Environmental Site Assessment Section 3 Site Description and History building are each one-story wooden buildings with concrete foundations (Photographs 1 through 3). The open-air garages have wooden frames with corrugated heavy plastic roofs. The main residence and studio apartment were built in approximately 1900, and the shop building, garages, and pump houses were built around 1950. The pump at the pump house located at the northern end of the property was installed around 1920 Photograph 4). It provides water from Stevens Creek for the garden area near the main residence. Historically, it pumped water for use in irrigating the orchard on the subject property. The pump system consists of a PVC pipe that enters the creek, a pressure tank to hold the creek water, the pump, and garden hoses used for distribution. The western pump house at the southern end of the property pumped creek water for irrigating the orchard (Photograph 5). The pump system consisted of a trap door in the creek bed, a concrete holding pit, and the pump. The holding pit is located in the concrete structure between the western and eastern pump houses. This concrete structure, covered with wooden planks, is separated into two comparments: one for the creek water and one for the groundwater well. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the creek water pump was installed in the 1920s or 1930s. The 8 -foot by 10 -foot pump house is now used for storage space. The pump is operable but has not been used in approximately twenty years. The eastern pump house at the southern end of the subject property houses a pump and equipment for a drinking water well (Photograph 6). The groundwater well is located in the concrete structure between the two pump houses. The well was installed between 1900 to 1905. Mr. Stocklmeir is unaware of the depth of the well; however, Mr. Stocklmeir stated that distribution pipes at least 120 feet long have been pulled out of the well. The well was used as the main drinking water source for the subject property until the property was connected to the City's water lines. The well system consists of pipes inserted to reach the groundwater, the pump, and a concrete pressure tank. The pump is inoperable and has not been used in over 50 years. The 8 -foot by 10 -foot pump house is now used for storage space. 3.4 Current Uses of Property Since 1996, Mr. Stocklmeir has rented out the main residence and the studio apartment. The orchard, consisting of approximately 150 orange trees and 20 walnut and apricot trees, fills the majority of the subject property not occupied by the main residence, pump houses, and other structures (Photographs 7 and 8). The orchard no longer functions as a commercial operation. The oranges are picked every March by volunteers from the Second Harvest Food Bank of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties in San Jose, California. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the extent of current orchard maintenance is discing the orchard surface two to three times a year. 3.5 Past Uses of Property According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the subject property has been owned by the Stocklmeir family since the turn of the century. Mr. Stocklmeir's great grandmother lived at the main residence from 1900 until the mid -1940s. His grandparents then lived at subject property from 1949 to 1996, at which time the main residence and studio apartment were rented out. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3-2 JACUPERTIMPHASE-RSEM M Cupertino Public Works Department Section 3 Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Site Description and History Until the late 1960s, the subject property ran a commercial orchard. The orchard area was primarily walnut trees and customers would come to the property to pick the nuts. A portion of the orchard was leased out for growing flowers. The orchard became economically unfeasible and the commercial business ended in the late 1960s. In the mid-1970s, the majority of the walnut trees were removed and replaced with orange trees. About twenty walnut and apricot trees remain at the northern end of the orchard. 3.6 Current and Past Uses of Adjoining Property The Stocklmeir family owned the land adjacent to the west side of the subject property before the area was developed into residences. That area grew additional walnut trees and was also leased out for flower growing. The Stocklmeir family sold that land in 1976. Aerial photographs, available from Pacific Aerial Surveys, were reviewed. The photographs were from the years 1960, 1968, 1978, and 1988. Appendix B presents copies of these aerial photographs. In the 1960 photograph, the surrounding area was used for agricultural and residential purposes. Orchards occupied the subject property, the adjacent property to the west, and portions of the area east of the subject property which is currently Blackberry Farm Park. The main residence is visible through the vegetation on the subject property. In the 1968 photograph, more of the surrounding area has been converted to residential uses. Orchards occupy the subject property and the adjacent property to the west. The area east of the subject property has been developed into a golf course. In the 1978 photograph, the majority of the surrounding area is residential property. On the subject property, the main residence, shop, garages, and pump hoses are visible. The studio apartment is not visible due to vegetation at the subject property. The northern portion of the orchard area appears to be heavily planted, but the southern half is either open space or lightly planted. Housing has been developed along Scenic Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property to the west. In the 1988 photograph, a few small agricultural areas still exist north and east of the subject property. The surrounding area is residential. At the subject property, all of the current structures are visible. The northern portion of the orchard is planted with large trees, while the southern portion has smaller trees. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3- 3 JACUPERTIMPHASE-ASEC3. WPD Section 4 Records Review A search of environmental regulatory agency databases was conducted by EDR for the subject property and properties in the vicinity of the subject property. The EDR database search was conducted to determine whether documentation exists related to environmental incidents at the subject property or at properties in its vicinity. Table 4-1 presents a summary that lists the database, search distance and number of sites recorded on the database searched. Figure 4-1 presents the location of sites located by the database search in the vicinity of subject property. Appendix C presents the results of the EDR database search. 4.1 Databases Searched The following databases and radii search distances were searched for the subject property: Federal Databases National Priorities List (NPL) and Records of Decision (ROD) - 1 mile; NPL Liens - subject property only; Delisted NPL - subject property only; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permitted Treatment, Storage and Disposal (RCRIS-TSD) facilities - 0.5 mile; RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) - subject property only; Corrective Actions (CORRACTS) - 1 mile; RCRA Registered small or large generators of hazardous waste (RCRIS Small Quantity/Large Quantity) - 0.25 mile; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information CERCLIS) - 0.5 mile; Superfund Consent Decrees (CONSENT) -1 mile; CERCLIS - No Further Response Action Planned Facilities (CERC-NFRAP) - subject property only; Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Activity Database System (PADS) - subject property only; Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) - subject property only; Facility Index System (FINDS) - subject property only; Toxic Release Inventory database (TRIS) - subject property only; Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - subject property only; Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) - subject property only; Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System (HMIRS) - subject property only; State of California, Regional and County Databases Cal -Sites (AWP/CAL-SITES) - 1 mile; California Bond Expenditure Plan (CA BEP) - 1 mile; Proposition 65 (Notify 65) - 1 mile; California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) - 1 mile; CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Table 4-1 EDR Site Inventor MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING ALL SITES TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC359034.1s Page 7 Search Target Distance Total Database Property Miles) 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 1 Plotted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Delisted NPL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RCRIS-TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 AWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cal -Sites 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 Notify 65 1.000 0 0 1 0 NR 1 CHMIRS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cortese 1.000 0 0 1 1 NR 2 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CERC-NFRAP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUST 0.500 0 3 8 NR NR 11 UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CA FID 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HAZNET 0.250 0 4 NR NR NR 4 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CA SLIC 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 CA Bond Exp. Plan 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CA WDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 South Bay Region 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Coal Gas 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC359034.1s Page 7 OVERVIEW MAP - 359034.1 s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. W./ N a M ES T E W :H 0 M Z%1/A j R D 9 / ! 25,0 s S REEK A VD / 8 t- M C, L L'LAN R Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) National Priority List Sites I I Landfill Sites 0 1/4 12 1 Miles Power transmission lines Oil & Gas pipelines Figure 4-1 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone EDR Overview Map TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi 1TY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY #: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 / 122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:39 am Section 4 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews State index of properties with hazardous waste (CORTESE) - 1 mile; Toxic Pits cleanup facilities (TOXIC PITS) -1 mile; CA Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery listing (CA SLIC) - 0.5 mile; State Landfill - 0.5 mile; Registered Underground Storage Tanks (UST) - 0. 5 mile; Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) - subject property only; Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) - 0.5 mile; Waste Management Units (WMUDS/SWAT) — 0. 5 mile; Hazardous Waste Information System (HAZNET) - 0.25 mile; California Facility Index Database (CA FID) - 0.25 mile; California Waste Discharge System (CA WDS) - subject property only. South Bay Site Management System (SOUTH BAY) - subject property only; and In addition, EDR searched former manufactured gas (Coal Gas) sites for a radius search of 1 mile. 4.2 Database Search Results A summary of listed environmental sites within the requested search distance follows. National Priorities List (NPL) Sites The National Priorities List (NPL) is a list of the nation's most serious hazardous waste sites. NPL sites are those sites which the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), under its Superfund program, has determined to be a significant threat to public health. The Records of Decision (ROD) document mandates a permanent remedy at an NPL site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup. The USEPA has the authority to file liens (NPL Liens) against real estate property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. The database searches indicated no NPL and ROD sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. There are no liens against the subject property and the subject property was not on nor deleted from the NPL. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Sites The RCRIS databases contain data compiled for RCRA and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. RCRIS lists sites which treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. RCRA administration action tracking system (RAATS) contains records based on enforcement action issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil suits. Under RCRA, the CORRACTS database contains hazardous waste haulers which are undergoing corrective action. The RCRIS database indicates that no TSD sites are located within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. The subject property is not listed in the RAATS database. The CORRACTS database search indicated one CORRACTS site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Zilog Incorporated is located approximately 0.75 miles southeast of the subject property. Zilog manufactured silicon, semiconductor wafers, and microprocessors, and was listed as a hazardous waste storage facility. Zilog operated three USTs: one for storage of waste solvents CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 2 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review acetone, isopropanol, freon, trichloroethane, xylene, and n -butyl acetate); one for containment of potential solvent spills; and one for containment of potential sulfuric, nitric, and hydrofluoric acid spills (J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates, 1983). J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates concluded no soil degradation had occurred from the operation of the acid spill tank, and no additional analytical testing was necessary for the waste solvent storage and spill containment USTs due to only trace levels (less than 20 micrograms per kilogram) of tetrachloroethane, toulene, and benzene found in soil samples near the other two USTs (J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates, 1983). According to Zilog, those chemicals were not used in their operations. In 1987, the California Department of Health Services (DHS) determined that no contamination resulting from Zilog's operations remained at the site (DHS, 1987). The Zilog site was officially closed by the DHS in 1988 (DHS, 1988). Due to the site closure by DHS, trace levels of contaminants in the soil, and distance from the subject property, it is unlikely that the site has impacted the subject property. RCRA Registered Large and Small Generators (LG GEN, SM GEN) of Hazardous Waste The EPA's RCRA facility database lists facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large Generators (LG GEN) are facilities which generate at least 1,000 kilograms of non -acutely hazardous waste per month while Small Generators SM GEN) produce less per month. No SM GEN or LG GEN sites are located within a 0.25 -mile radius of the subject property. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERCLA) Sites The CERCLA Information System (CERCLIS) supports EPA Headquarters and regions for the management and oversight of the Superfund program. CERCLA sites are either on the NPL or are in screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. CONSENT decrees are major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL sites. CERC- NFRAP sites are those CERCLA sites where no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not serious enough to require NPL consideration. No CERCLIS or CONSENT sites are located within a 0.5 -mile and 1 -mile radius of the subject property, respectively. The subject property was not listed on the CERC-NFRAP database. PCB Activity Database System (PADS) The PADS identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. The PADS database search indicated that the subject property is not a PADS site. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) The ERNS list is a national database used to collect information on reported accidental releases of oil and hazardous substances. Spill reports are made to federal authorities including the EPA, the CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 3 JAC U PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review US Coast Guard, the National Response Center and the Department of Transportation. The ERNS database search indicated that the subject property is not an ERNS site. Facility Index System (FINDS) FINDS contains both facility information and references to other sources that contain more detail. The FINDS database search indicated that the subject property is not a FINDS site. Toxic Release Inventory Database (TRIS) Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act (also known as SARA Title III) of 1986 requires the EPA to establish an inventory of toxic chemicals emissions from certain facilities. Facilities subject to this reporting are required to complete a Toxic Chemical Release Form Form R) for specified chemicals. The TRIS database search indicated that the subject property is not a TRIS site. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) TSCA identifies manufactures and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. The TSCA database search indicated that the subject property is not a TSCA site. Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. The MLTS database search indicated that the subject property is not a MLTS site. Hazardous Materials Information Reporting Systems (HMIRS) The HMIRS database contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to the Department of Transportation. The HMIRS database search indicated that the subject property is not a HMIRS site. California Annual Workplan (AWP) California Department of Toxic Substance Control's Annual Workplan, formerly Bond Expenditure Plan (BEP), identifies known hazardous substance sites targeted for cleanup. The AWP and BEP database search indicated no AWP or BEP sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 4 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review Calsites (CAL -SITES) The CAL -SITES database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties as reported by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC). The CAL -SITES database search indicated one CAL -SITES site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation (KACC) is located just under one mile west of the subject property. In 1987, KACC decontaminated and closed a paint/sludge UST. Oil and grease was found in the surrounding soil at concentrations of 1,100 to 2,600 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). A subsequent investigation found that samples from underlying soils had chromium and lead levels consistent with regional background levels, and purgeable and aromatic hydrocarbons levels below detection limits. One groundwater sample from the site exceeded the Primary Drinking Water Standard for chromium (Exceltech, Inc., 1988). In 1988, a kerosene spill occurred at KACC. Excavated contaminated soil contained high levels of vegetable oil. Subsequent analysis of samples from the area of the release indicated vegetable oil in the soil samples at concentrations from 19 to 24 mg/kg, and in a groundwater sample at a concentration of 100 micrograms per liter. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) as kerosene was found in soil samples ranging in concentration from 14 to 32 mg/kg, but was not detected in groundwater. TPH as kerosene concentrations in soil were below the action level of 100 mg/kg. No action level exists for vegetable oil in soil or groundwater (ENSCO Environmental Services, 1988). No documentation from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or any other environmental agency on action taken at the KACC site existed in the RWQCB files. Mr. David Bar with the RWQCB stated the KACC case is inactive, a status which usually occurs when there is a shortage of staff to investigate the case at its onset. Even though the groundwater flow is the area is to the east, Mr. Bar indicated that the subject property was unlikely to have been impacted by the KACC site due to the distance, just under one mile, between the two sites. Proposition 65 (Notify 65) Notify 65 contains facility notifications about any release which could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The Notify 65 database search indicated one Notify 65 site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Arco Service Station #6182 is located approximately 0.40 miles west of the subject property. The site was also listed in the LUST Region 2 database as having reported a release from a gasoline UST in 1988. According to the EDR report, the Santa Clara Valley Water District SCVWD) signed off on the site on July 29, 1996. Due to the case closure by the SCVWD, it is unlikely that the Notify 65 site has impacted the subject property. California Hazardous Material Information Reporting System (CHMIRS) The CHMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to Department of Transportation. The CHMIRS database search indicated no CHMIRS sites within a one -mile radius of the subject CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 5 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Section 4 Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Records Review property. State Index of Properties with Hazardous Waste (Cortese) The Cortese database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with underground storage tanks having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency. The Cortese database search indicated two Cortese sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. The Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation is located just under a mile from the subject property. A detailed description of the release and subsequent investigation can be found above in the section on CAL -SITES sites. The other Cortese site is the Measurex Corporation and is further discussed under LUST sites. Toxic Pits Toxic Pit sites are suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. The Toxic Pits database search indicated no Toxic Pit sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. California Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup (CA SLIC) CA SLIC sites are sites that have impacted groundwater or have the potential to impact groundwater. The CA SLIC database is provided by the RWQCB. The CA SLIC database search indicated one CA SLIC site within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. The Cupertino Post Office is located approximately 0.45 miles east of the subject property. The EDR report states a release from a waste oil UST occurred at the site. The RWQCB closed the site investigation on August 10, 1993. Based on the case closure by the RWQCB, it is unlikely that the CA SLIC site has impacted the subject property. State Landfill The Solid Waste Facilities /Landfill SITES site (SWF/LF) type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that fail to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. The State Landfill database search indicated no state landfill sites located within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-6 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks (UST/AST), Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historic listing of UST and LUST sites. The source of the database is from the State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB). The database search located no registered UST sites within a 0.25 -mile radius. The AST database lists registered ASTs as reported by the SWRCB. The EDR database reported no ASTs at the subject property. The LUST database search indicated 11 LUST sites within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. Of the 11 sites listed, "Dennis Hall Property," "Arco #6182," "U.S. Postal Service," and "Measurez Corporation" are duplicates. Of the remaining seven LUST sites, six site investigations have been closed ("Facciola Residence," "Dennis Hall Property," "Arco," "US Postal Service," "Higdon, Alley, Kolb" and "Measurex Corporation"). Neither the RWQCB nor the SCVWD has a file for the remaining site, the Mobile Service Station. The RWQCB and the EDR database report that the site was removed from the SCVWD's LUST database. Ms. Jeanette Townsend of the SCVWD, the lead agency for the site, confirmed that that agency has no file for the site and if the site was removed from the LUST database there was no contamination problem at the site. This concurs with the EDR database which reports the soil contamination occurred at such a low level as to not pose a threat to water quality. Based on the information from the RWQCB and SCVWD, it is unlikely that the LUST sites have impacted the subject property. Waste Management Unit Database (WMUDS/SWAT) WMUDS/SWAT is used by the SWRCB to track and inventory waste management units and consist of 12 separate databases. The WMUDS/SWAT database search indicated there are no WMUDS/SWAT sites within a 0.5 -mile radius of the subject property. Hazardous Waste Information System (HAZNET) The California Environmental Protection Agency provides a database (HAZNET) from the manifest data extracted from copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The HAZNET database search indicated four HAZNET sites within a 0.25 -mile radius of the subject property. Of the four sites, "Clarks Auto Parts & Machine" is a duplicate. The three remaining sites Dan Facciola", "Lynn Markey", and "Clarks Auto Parts & Machine") do not have files at the California Environmental Protection Agency. The DTSC is currently reviewing their files to determine if information exists on the remaining sits. If information does become available that suggests a HAZNET site has had the potential to impact the subject property, CDM will notify the Cupertino Public Works Department. California Facility Inventory Database (FID) California Environmental Protection Agency provides the Facility Inventory Database (FID) which contains a historical listing from the SWRCB. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-7 JACUPERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review The FID database search indicated no FID sites within a 0.25 -mile radius of the subject property. California Waste Discharge System (CA WDS) CA WDS sites are sites which may have been issued waste discharge requirements by the SWRCB. The CA WDS database search indicated the subject property is not a CA WDS site. South Bay Site Management System (SOUTH BAY) The SOUTH BAY database lists groundwater pollution cases in the Santa Clara Valley where the regulatory lead is the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. The SOUTH BAY database search indicted the subject property is not a SOUTH BAY site. Orphan Sites Orphan sites are sites listed in any of the databases EDR searched and are potentially within one mile of the subject property, but cannot be accurately mapped. The EDR database search indicated eight orphan sites potentially within one -mile of the subject property. Two sites are duplicates either of sites on the orphans list or sites from the other databases ("Arco Stn #495" and "Kaiser Aluminum"). Based on the partial addresses provided for the orphan sites, CDM concluded five of the sites to be greater than one -mile from the subject property: "Arco Service Station #495," "Texaco," "Doneervyn's," and "Rancho Service Center." The remaining site, Hanson Permanente Cement, formerly Kaiser Cement Corporation, is located just under one mile west of the subject property. A number of USTs in five areas at the site have been removed or closed in place. In 1993, Kaiser Cement Corporation removed one 10,000 -gallon diesel UST and two 10,000 -gallon gasoline USTs from the Upper Service Station area. Soil samples revealed only minor levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons. TPH as gasoline was detected at a maximum concentration of 22 mg/kg, and TPH as diesel was not detected above laboratory reporting limits (RWQCB, 1995). The RWQCB closed the site investigation of this area in 1995. A copy of the closure letter is included in Appendix D. According to SCVWD files, four 1,000 -gallon diesel USTs were removed from the Lower Service Station. Floating product was observed in the tank pit and excavated soils had a strong diesel odor, but no soil samples were collected. One 4,000 -gallon diesel UST was removed from the Emergency Generator Area. During removal, the tank appeared undamaged but its lines and plumbing showed signs of leakage. Excavated soil had a diesel odor and contained product. No soil samples were obtained from this area. USTs were also removed from the Garage and Oil House areas. At least two of these USTs were closed in place. According to the SCVWD, no further remedial work is necessary at the Garage and Oil House areas. On March 2, 1999, the SCVWD requested Hanson Permanent Cement submit a work plan to define the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the Lower Service Station and the Emergency Generator Area (SCVWD, 1999). According to Ms. Adele Shepherd with SCVWD, Hanson Permanente Cement submitted a workplan which has been approved by the SCVWD and is now being implemented. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-8 JACUPERTI N\PHASE-I\SEC4. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 4 Records Review Even though the groundwater flow is the area is to the east, due to the distance of the Hanson Permanente Cement site from the subject property (just under one mile), the potential is minimal that the LUST site has impacted the subject property. 4.2 Physical Setting The property is located in the west -central portion of the Santa Clara Valley which is a broad structural trough infilled with alluvial sediments. The subject property is within the corporate boundaries of the City of Cupertino. Stevens Creek flows adjacent to the east and south sides of the subject property. The climate in the area maintains a fairly constant temperature due the effects of surrounding bodies of water, the Pacific Ocean and the San Francisco Bay. Summers are cool and often foggy and winters are moderately wet. The subject property experiences the same climatic conditions as much of the Santa Clara Valley which is represented by climate data collected in San Jose. Based on 50 years of climate data, a monthly average minimum temperature of 41.3 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) occurs in January and a monthly average maximum temperature of 82.2 OF occurs in July. Temperature extremes have been recorded at a low of 19 OF in December 1990 to a high of 108 OF in July 1972. The annual average precipitation is 14.61 inches (Western Regional Climate Center, 1999). The subject property is situated in the central part of the Coast Ranges, which is characterized by a series of parallel, northwesterly -trending, folded and faulted mountain chains. In this part of the province, flatland topography is underlain by recent alluvium which is typically underlain by non -marine and marine sedimentary rocks. The region has been folded and faulted as a result of major uplift of the area. The Department of Water Resources (DWR) identifies the Santa Clara Formation as a principle group of the water -bearing units in the Santa Clara Valley groundwater basin (Bulletin No. 118-1, 1975). DWR's report modeled the entire basin and identified preferential groundwater pathways created by highly permeable coarse-grained channel deposits of the Santa Clara Formation which have been intersected by numerous faults. Another study by DWR (Bulletin No. 66-62, 1964) states that the main source of groundwater in the Santa Clara Valley is the younger alluvium and that the Santa Clara Formation is of secondary importance. In addition, the principal aquifers of the area exhibit pressure characteristics so that the groundwater is both confined and unconfined. Groundwater flow in the area generally follows the topography, which would indicate an easterly flow gradient (EMCON Associates, 1993). Groundwater in this area of the Santa Clara Valley is generally a bicarbonate type with sodium and calcium the predominant cations. Although moderately to very hard, the waters are of good to excellent quality and suitable for most uses DWR, 1964). CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4-9 JACU PEATI N\PHASE-1\SEC4. W PD Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews On April 22, 1999, CDM met with Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, one of the four owners of the subject property, at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir was interviewed by CDM to obtain information regarding the subject property history, existing conditions, and property -specific information related to current and past operations. The Stocklmeir family has owned the subject property since the 1900s, and Mr. Stocklmeir is the most knowledgeable of the current family owners about the subject property. The interview was followed by a walkthrough of the subject property. The subject property was assessed for recognized environmental conditions with respect to hazardous substances, solid waste/non-hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos - containing materials, air quality, storage tanks, water, wastewater, storm water, herbicides and pesticides, and lead-based paint. CDM did not access the interior of the buildings on the subject property, but observations were made through the windows. 5.1 Hazardous Substances No hazardous substances were observed at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir is not aware of any spills or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property or surround properties. During the site walkthrough, CDM did not observe any operations that would produce hazardous wastes. 5.2 Solid Waste/Non-Hazardous Waste During the site walkthrough, several piles of solid waste were observed at the subject property. One small pile of used wooden shingles is present at the southern end of the site. Along the western boundary of the subject property, small piles of building materials such as metal fencing, lumber, and metal pipes were observed (Photograph 9). Mr. Stocklmeir indicated the shingles were previously used on one of the pump houses, and the building materials are related to his personal contractor business. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, there are no discarded items on the subject property. Residential waste generated at the subject property is disposed of through Cupertino's city-wide trash disposal service. 5.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls According to Mr. Bob Bondy of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), there are two pieces of oil -filled electrical equipment on the subject property. A capacitor bank is located at the northeastern corner of the subject property at the corner of the driveway and Stevens Creek Boulevard. According to Mr. Bondy, the capacitor is labeled as having no PCB -containing fluid. PG&E also operates a pole -mounted transformer located at the southern corner of the subject property. No sticker is affixed to this transformer. According to Mr. Bondy, PG&E does not test transformers for PCBs if they have not been leaking. Mr. Bondy stated that if the residential units at CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC5. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews the subject property are demolished, PG&E will remove the transformer. 5.4 Asbestos -Containing Materials The main residence, studio, and the other subject property structures were constructed between 1900 and 1950, before the commercial use of asbestos -containing material (ACM). ACM are usually found in structures built or renovated between the late 1950's and the early 1980's. However, it is likely that during renovations and additions to the building friable and/or non -friable ACM was used. The existence of friable and/or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. However, without conducting an asbestos survey, the presence and extent, if any, of ACM at the subject property cannot be determined. 5.5 Air Quality The site walkthrough did not reveal any particulate, gas, odor, or emission to the atmosphere from the subject property that would violate any environmental regulation. No violations for the subject property are on file with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 5.6 Storage Tanks According to Mr. Stocklmeir, no USTs are located on the subject property. CDM did not discover any indication that a UST exists or existed at the subject property. One approximately 400 -gallon AST is located on the dirt on the east side of the driveway Photograph 10). According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the AST contained propane used to heat the main residence in the 1930s and 1940s. Use of the AST was discontinued in the mid -1940s or earlier when natural gas became available. To Mr. Stocklmeir's knowledge, the AST is empty. Mr. Stocklmeir is not aware of a permit for the AST or if the AST has been located at any other spot on the subject property. The AST appeared to be in good condition with some light rust along the upper rim and did not appear to be connected to any piping. 5.7 Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water According to Mr. Stocklmeir, a groundwater well was installed at the subject property between 1900 to 1905 by his great grandfather. The well is located outside the eastern pump house located at the southern end of the subject property. The main residence was connected to the city water supply in the 1940s or earlier. Mr. Stocklmeir stated the well is abandoned and has not been used in over 50 years. The well has not been destroyed. A one -compartment septic tank is located on the east side of the driveway, as shown in Figure 3-2 Photograph 11). The approximately 700 -gallon tank services the main residence and the studio apartment. Only sanitary wastewater is generated at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir is unaware of when the septic tank was installed, but stated it was there when his grandparents lived at the subject property starting in 1949. To Mr. Stocklmeir's knowledge, no permit exists for the septic tank. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5-2 J:\CUPERT1N\PHASE-1\SEC5.WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews Mr. Stocklmeir stated occasional stoppages occur every one or two years in the septic tanks lines running from the residences. The commercial service RotoRooter is contracted to clean the lines in those instances. The tank is pumped out every two years by A -Able Septic Tank Company. Three leach lines for the wastewater run underground into the orchard area: one north towards the pump house, and the other two run northeast and east, respectively, into the orchard. Valves to control the flow of the lines are located near the septic tank inside PVC piping. No distressed vegetation was observed in the area of the leach field. Mr. Stocklmeir stated that storm water at the subject property either percolates through the soil or flows east to Stevens Creek. No pavement is present at the subject property except for small patio areas. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, a storm water pipeline runs from the housing development adjacent to the west side of the subject property across the orchard to Stevens Creek via an easement across the subject property. The eastern end of the pipe is visible as a corrugated metal pipe in the western side of the creek bed (Photograph 12). 5.8 Herbicides and Pesticides Use Mr. Stocklmeir hired New View Landscape Service to perform yard work at the subject property consisting of raking and collecting leaves and trimming the bushes. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, no herbicides or pesticides are currently used at the subject property. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, fertilizer has not been used on the orange trees in approximately 10 years. When the orchard produced walnuts for commercial use, the walnut trees were sprayed with herbicides and pesticides. Mr. Stocklmeir stated that mixing or storing of chemicals did not occur at the subject property. The commercial orchard business ended in the late 1960s. No signs of distressed vegetation or stained soil were observed during the site walkthrough. It is possible, although no evidence was found during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement of pesticides (i.e., a spill during mixing or dilution and over application) from historical uses associated with the orchard may have adversely impacted the subject property. In general, pesticides have low vapor pressures, do not biodegrade, and adhere to soil extremely well. Therefore, even though the property stopped serving as an orchard, pesticide residues may still be present in the soil. Farmers began to use DDT as a pesticide in the 1940s. Usually, DDT does not spread to more than a foot below ground surface (Hayes, 1975). According to Toxicology of Pesticides, "residues of pesticides in soil are rarely important as a source of direct exposure to people" (Hayes, 1975). The only orchard maintenance occurring at the subject property is discing of the soil, which could significantly decrease the residual pesticides at the subject property (Hayes, 1975). The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. Major disturbance of the soil may increase potential for human exposure to residual pesticide potentially present in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. 5.9 Lead -Based Paint Due to the age of the buildings on the subject property, it is likely that lead-based paints have been used. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop and on the walls of the western pump house (Photographs 3 and 5). CDM observed no paint chips on the soil at these areas. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead-based paint is minimal. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5-3 JAGUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC5. W PD Section 6 Conclusions and Recommendations This Phase I ESA is based upon information researched and made available to CDM through May 5, 1999. Any subsequent information received by CDM which modifies the conclusions of this report will be submitted to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department in later correspondence. Based on the information provided to CDM and observations made during the walkthrough of the subject property, no recognized environmental conditions at the subject property were discovered during the performance of the Phase I ESA. No information was discovered that would suggest that off-site properties had released contaminants that would results in environmental contamination of the subject property. However, due to the age of the structures at the subject property it is likely asbestos -containing material (ACM) and lead-based paints were used during construction and any renovations. The existence of friable and/or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. Prior to any renovation or demolition of the buildings at the subject property, CDM recommends a certified asbestos consultant conduct an asbestos survey of the buildings. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop building and on the wall of the western pump house. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead-based paint is minimal. In addition, the subject property served as a commercial orchard until the late 1960s. It is possible, although no evidence was found during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement (i.e., spill during mixing or dilution and over application) of pesticides from uses associated with the orchard may have adversely impacted the subject property. The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. The orchard maintenance that occurs at the subject property could reduce the residual pesticides in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. Prior to any major disturbance of the soil at the subject property, CDM recommends collecting soil samples to determine the extent of impact, if any. Finally, one abandoned well exists at the eastern pump house in the southwest section of the subject property. If the well will no longer be used, CDM recommends properly destroying the well with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 6-1 JACU PERTI N\PHASE-I\SEC6. W PD Section 7 References, contacts, and List of Acronyms Used References Department of Health Services, 1987. Letter to Mr. Phil Bobel, USEPA Region IX. April 8, 1987. Department of Health Services, 1988. Letter to Mr. Pirooz Lahiji, Zilog Corporation, Subject: Zilog Facility, 10640 Bubb Road, Cupertino, EPA ID No. CAD 076314459. October 13, 1988. Department of Water Resources, 1964. "Quality of Ground Waters in California, 1961 and 1962, Park I, Northern and Central California," State of California Department of Water Resources, Bulletin No. 66-62, August 1964. Department of Water Resources, 1975. "Evaluation of Ground Water Resources: South San Francisco Bay, Volume III: Northern Santa Clara County Area," State of California Department of Water Resources in cooperation with Santa Clara Valley Water District, Bulletin No. 118-1, December 1975. EMCON Associates, 1993. Environmental Evaluation Report, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, Permanente Facility, Cupertino, California. June 1993. ENSCO Environmental Services, Incorporated, 1988. Letter to Mr. Rich Merkel, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. June 6, 1988. Exceltech, Incorporated, 1988. Soil and Groundwater Investigation for Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. January 5, 1988. Hayes, Wayland J., Jr., 1975. Toxicology of Pesticides. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore. 1975. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1960. Aerial photograph AV 385/7/13. August 22, 1960. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1968. Aerial photograph AV 857/1/7. July 15,1968. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1978. Aerial photograph AV 1497/4/6. May 8,1978. Pacific Aerial Survey, 1989. Aerial photograph AV 3661/9/ 2. October 18, 1989. Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1995. Letter to Mr. Phil Gaynor, Kaiser Cement Corporation, Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certificate for 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. December 21, 1995. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7-1 JACUPERTIN\PHASE-1\SEC7. WPD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Section 7 References, Contacts, List of Acronyms Used Santa Clara Valley Water District, 1999. Letter to Mr. Earl Bouse, Hanson Permanente Cement, Subject: Fuel Leak Investigation at Kaiser Cement, 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. March 2, 1999. United States Geological Survey, Cupertino Quadrangle, California, 15 Minute Series (Topographic), 1961, photorevised 1980. Western Regional Climate Center, 1999. SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA (047821), Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary, Period of Record: 71111948 to 12/ 31/1998. Web site http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi- bin/ cliMAIN.p l?casj os+sfo. Contacts Santa Clara County Recorder Santa Clara County Assessor 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 1st Floor 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 5th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 San Jose, CA 95110 408-299-2481 408-299-3227 Adele Shepherd David Bar Jeanette Townsend San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Santa Clara Valley Water District Control Board 5750 Almaden Expressway 1515 Clay Street, #1400 San Jose, CA 95118 Oakland, CA 94612 408-265-2600 510- 622-2300 Bob Bondy Bay Area Air Quality Management District Pacific Gas and Electric Company 939 Ellis Street 10900 North Blaney Avenue San Francisco, CA 94109 Cupertino, CA 95014 408-725- 2204 Alan Stocklmeir 10240 Stonydale Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 408-738-3758 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7- 2 JACU P ERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC7. W PD Cupertino Public Works Department Phase l Environmental Site Assessment List of Acronyms Used Section 7 References, Contacts, List of Acronyms Used ACM Asbestos -Containing Material AST Aboveground storage tank ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWP California Annual Workplan CA SLIC California Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup CA WDS California Waste Discharge System CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS - No Further Response Action Planned Facilities CERCLIS CERCLA Information System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Information Reporting System CONSENT Superfund Consent Decrees CORRACTS Corrective Actions DHS California Department of Health Services DTSC Department of Toxic Substance Control DWR California Department of Water Resources EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ESA Environmental Site Assessment FID California Facility Inventory Database FINDS Facility Index System HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting Systems KACC Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation LUST Leaking underground storage tank mg/kg millograms per kilogram MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System NPL National Priorities List PADS PCB Activity Database PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company RAATS RCRA administration action tracking system RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ROD Records of Decision RWQCB San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities /Landfill SWRCB State Water Resource Control Board TPH Total petroleum hydrocarbons TRIS Toxic Release Inventory Database TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TSD Treat, store, or dispose (of hazardous waste) USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UST Underground storage tank WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7-3 JACU P ERTI N\PHASE-1\SEC7. W PD Appendix A Site Photographs 143 11 vo r - ell IV k f,jfti 1. i Vb b / 46 l... i , mow.' 11 F ell IV F ell k Vb N IRS ij. lip z -w anfit ki Tl April 22, 1999 Photograph 7 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Orange trees in main orchard area. April 22, 1999 Photograph 8 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Walnut and apricot trees in northern orchard area. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California D April 22, 1999 Photograph 9 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Piles of building materials along western edge of subject property. April 22, 1999 Photograph 10 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Abandoned propane AST along subject property driveway. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California April 22, 1999 Photograph 11 Photographed By: Andria Pomponi Description: Septic tank used for main residence and studio apartment, along driveway. April 22, 1999 Photograph 12 Photographed B; Andria Pomponi Description: Loc along Stevens C where residentia stormwater line along eastern ed subject property SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California Appendix B Information Reviewed i 2 3 4 5 7 9 1C 1 1J 14 13- i55Z5 17 13 7 Q 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2'7 28 LAW 0MCKa ortrelc.A rO..t AYC.Y[ TING. CA 35014 59-CS91 REC. FUEE i l _ MICS0 IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO-RN_ A OTB +, IN AND -70R THE CCU -:TY Or SANTA CLARA E, 1PF In re the -Estate of ) No. i06206 1jU- C-GM_ENT OF DISTRZBUTZGN LOUTS STCC{L..j7IR j ON -.,JA 7,r:--' OF ,CCGJNTING Decedent_ ) Hearing a*e. :larch 1 2cJ' 984 GLAD71S 3. S_CC:{ X_-- _R, _s t ,e Executorc f e Estate o - LOUIS E. S1'CC :_4E1, deceased, hav_na heretofcr-e filed 'her verified re crt cf ixec:ltCr on Waivers cz AccCunting and Petition for Final tD1j:.._tr .7LI_Cn, and t:+e same C;'*i_ng on -h47, duv reQlllu_'1v fOT hE'ar7n-, the Court finds: Due nctice of the hear4 na of the ceti tion has oeen regularly I ' given as requ: red by law. I I All allegations of the Petition are true. LOUIS E. STCCXL.;SEIR died testate on September 24, 1982, in1 i the County of Santa Clara,, State of California, and was a resident thereof at the time of his death_ Decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977 was admitted to Probate by Order of this Court on vanuary 3, 1983. Petitioner qualified as Executor and Letters Testamentary were issued to Petitioner on January 3, 1983, and at all times since then has been and now is the Executor of decedent's Will_ 9I+yRA'!'!i"ziR-..,. .-:- ,. ,...•. . 1 .._....-.-_„.__.....-._.-___._.._.-.-.._.__.._.-,.__.._.._.__. _._...__.. ......... ..._- 5018008 FILED FIR RECORD 1: } MTTFROSTLACIOFFICES 10413 Ai lUE... Torre Avenue 1*y0 G 9 1084 Cupertino, CA 95014P Z9 12 40 !' 1. Ce,,ntj Clc:% Telephone: (408) 253-053_:y GrylC!AL RECORDS JAMES A_ FROST S.i'A CLARA COUNT. GE A. )AANN 3•,. DEPUTY Attorney for Petitioner T?AR REGMER REC. FUEE i l _ MICS0 IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO-RN_ A OTB +, IN AND -70R THE CCU -:TY Or SANTA CLARA E, 1PF In re the -Estate of ) No. i06206 1jU-C-GM_ENT OF DISTRZBUTZGN LOUTS STCC{L..j7IR j ON -.,JA 7,r:--' OF ,CCGJNTING Decedent_ ) Hearing a*e. :larch 12cJ' 984 GLAD71S 3. S_CC:{ X_-- _R, _s t ,e Executorc f e Estate o - LOUIS E. S1'CC :_4E1, deceased, hav_na heretofcr-e filed 'her verified re crt cf ixec:ltCr on Waivers cz AccCunting and Petition for Final tD1j:.._tr .7LI_Cn, and t:+e same C;'*i_ ng on -h47, duv reQlllu_'1v fOT hE'ar7n-, the Court finds: Due nctice of the hear4 na of the ceti tion has oeen regularlyI ' given as requ: red by law. I I All allegations of the Petition are true. LOUIS E. STCCXL.;SEIR died testate on September 24, 1982, in1 i the County of Santa Clara,, State of California, and was a resident thereof at the time of his death_ Decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977 was admitted to Probate by Order of this Court on vanuary 3, 1983. Petitioner qualified as Executor and Letters Testamentary were issued to Petitioner on January 3, 1983, and at all times since then has been and now is the Executor of decedent's Will_ 9I+yRA'!'!i"ziR-..,. .-:- ,. ,...•. .1 .._....-.-_„.__.....-._.-___._.._.-.-.._.__.._.-,.__.._.._.__. _._...__.. ......... ..._- 1410- 636 1 Notice to Creditors has been duly given as required by law, 2 the time for filing or presenting claims has expired, and the 3 estate is now in a condition to be closed. 1 No claims have been filed or presented against the estate. 5 ` All debts of the decedent and of the estate and all the expenses 6 ! of the administration except closing expenses, attorney's fees, - 7 Executor-conlissions, and certain costs advanced by the attorney 8 have been paid. 9 An Amended Invento-y and Aopraiser,etit of the estate was duly 10 returned and tiled cn December 5, 1983, showing the value of the 11 decedent's estate to be $613,220.00. 12 All personal prooerty taxes due and payable by the estate, 13 if any, have been paid. A clearance is on file. 14 A federal estate tax return has been filed for the estate 15 and the tax shown in the return has been paid. The total state 16 death tax credit allowable for federal and state tax purposes has 17 been calculated and paid to the State of California. The return 18 has not yet been audited. Petitioner has not been released from 19 personal liability for federal,estate tax. 20 All California state_ and federal income taxes becoming due 21 and payable during the period of administration of the estate if 22 any, and the filing of closing fiduciary income tax return will 23 be assumed by the Petitioner. 24 The Waivers vi Accounting by JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, ALAN L. 25 STOCKLMEIR, and DFAMN STOCKLMEIR, all the beneficiaries and 26 remaindermen under the Will of the decedent are on file herein. 27 The Petitioner should be authorized and directed to pay to 28 herselZ the sum of $13,414.40 in discharge of statutory commissions T Ll.w FFICL!S A OIt[< IOt L 2- LOMVIIN,.ltli. GUPCHTINO. U 91010 00) 11:2-0131 4mm.. ..0n,,., _ a 3a :r+Ja+.k t a `.r it - r:4 • .... F , 7 i , 1 The Petitioner should be authorized and directed to pay to 2 JAMES A. FROST, Esq. the sum of $13,414.40 as the statutory attorney 3 fess for his services rendered to the administration in.this estate, i4inthesumof $350. 80 for costs advanced. + i 5 The Petitioner should be authorized to retain $:;00.00 in cash 6 pending a final audit of tax returns, and for any liabilities that 7 may be determined to be due from the estate. 8 Distribution should be ordered as prayed for in the Petition 9 and as hereinafter in this Order specified. 10 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: li 1. The administration of this estate is brought to a close, 12 without requirement of an accounting. 13 2. All the acts and proceedings of the Petitioner as Executor 14 relating to matters set forth in the Petition are ratified, confirmL 15 and approved. 16 3. The Executor is authorized and directed to pay to herself 17 the sum of $13,414.40, statutory commission for services rendered 18 to the estate. 19 4. The Executor is authorized and directed to pay to the 20 attorney, JAMES A. FROST, Esq., the sum of $13,414.40, the statutor} 21 fees for servicos rendered in the administration of this estate, 22 and the sum of $350.80 for certain costs advanced. 23 5. Petitioner is authorized to retain $300.00 for closing 24- expenses of administration and as a reserve for a possible tax 25 deficiencies, and to deliver the unused part to the Trustee appoint( 26 herein without further Court order after the closing expenses have 27 been paid and the various taxes have been finally determined 28 settled. 9T %W OFFICES c ueanw_ 3 _ rneror.wr urr, io nlnec wvc..u[ V. WD—.D. CA 35014 401 157.0531 I 1 2 J 4 51 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7BT LAW OFFICER M(]I[C.IUHAI UNMIINA TIQN IO.IJ TU..0 -C-C CUI•ERTIND. CA 95014 4:18) 753.0531 14 (53 6. Notice to Creditors has been given as required by law; 7. The Executor has in her possession belonging to said estate and remaining for distribution the following described property which is to be distributed in the following manner in accordance with the terms of decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977: - a. To DEAN STOCKLMEIR as to a one-half (_1/2) interest and to ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR and JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, in equal shares, as to a one-half interest in the miscellaneous fur:ziture, furnishin, and personal effects located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulev?rd, Cupertino, California. b. The real property described herein below„is distribu;_d to DEAN STCCKLMEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR, in trust, to be held, administered, and distributed by the Co -Trustees in accordance with the terms of the decedent's Will dated November 18, 1977: 1) Unimproved real property in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as: ALL OF LOTS 30 and 31, as shown on the Map entitled, TRACT NO. 5915 THE MEADOWS OF CUPERTINO", which Map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County cf Santa Clara, State of California on November 30, 1976, in Book 384 of Maps, at pages 18 and 19. 2) ResidentaV real property commonly ;mown as 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California and situated in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL NO. 1 Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section No. 278 as delineai- d and so designated on the Map hereinafter referred to; thenco running among the Easterly lines of Sections No. 278, 275 and 275 A as shown on said Map, N. 120 1' W. 402 feet to the Southeasterly line of Scenic Boulevard; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of Scenic Boulevard, 76.33 feet; thence S. 0° 7' W. to the Northwesterly corner of said Section 275 and continuing S. 0° 7' W. along the Test line of said Section 275 and along the extension of said West line a total distance of 334.30 feet to a point on the South line 4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7 28 IOST LAW OFFICES rHorr u mui UHVfIpAI ON ia.0 rt1HHc wvrHu[ r:OPIERTIN0, CA 95014 409) 357.0331 n 1410. 1- 639 of said Section 278 distant thereon East 25 feet fromtheSouthwestcornerofsaidSection278; thence East130.35 feet to the point of beginning, and being allofSectionsNumbered275and275AandpartsofSectionsNumbered274and278, as said Sections are delineatedandsodesignateduponthatcertainMapentitled, "MapofInspirationPoint, Monta Vista", and which Map wasfiledforrecordintheofficeoftheRecorderoftheCountyofSantaClara, State of California, on April11, 1917, in Book "P" of Maps, page 18. PARCEL NO. 2 Beginning at the point of intersection of the SoutherlylineofStevensCreekRoad, as it formerly existed 40feetwide, with the center line of Stevens Creek; thenceinageneralSoutherlydirectionalongthecenterline Of Stevens Creek the following courses and distances; S. 480 30' E. 110,55 feet; S. 590 45' E. 132.00 feet; S. 45° E. 162.03 feet; S. 3° 37' E. 122.10 feet; S. 4° 8' W. 231.66 feet; S. 24° W. 80.26 feet; S. 36° T4. 199.32feet; S. 2S° W. 54.12 feet; and S. 36° 30' W. 107.38feettoastationdesignatedD. S.. 5 from which a sycamc_e14inchesindiametermarketB.T.D.S.5 bears S. 360 45' E. 17.82 feet; thence leaving the center line of Stevens Creek and running along the Easterly line of Monta VistaPark, the Map of which is of record in Bo -k "P" of Maps, page 19, Santa Clara County Records, and along theEasterlylineofInspirationPoint, Monta Vista, theMapofwhichisofrecordinBook "P" of Maps, page 18, Santa Clara County Records, the following courses anddistances; N. 40 41' W. 339.24 feet to a station designatedD. S. 4; N.4° 11' W. 191.40 feet to a pipe; and N. 12° 1' W. 448.00 feet to a pipe at the Northeasterly cornerofsaidInspirationPoint, Monta Vista; thence N. 37° 42' W. 13.00 feet to a pipe on said Southerly line ofStevensCreekRoad; thence along said Southerly lineofStevensCreekRoad, N.'890 E. 84.48 feet to the pointofbeginning, containing 4.857 acres of land, more orless, and being a portion of the San Antonio Rancho, and being shown upon that certain Map entitled, "MapofasurveymadeforAdelheidM. Stocklmeir in the SanAntonioRanch", which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder or the Recorder of the CountyofSantaClara, State of California, on Decemb.-r 29, 1915, in "-.ok "O" of Maps, page 88. C. Decedent's Will, dated November 18, 1977, provides as follows: I. I further give, devise and bequeath to the said DEAN STOCKLMEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR, as Co -Trustees, in trust, my 5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i 11 1:2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RO LAW OFFICES HUI I'RRtU.a AL U HI•IIHwtIU. 14 1: 1_ IIIFHC wVl. I.uC ru 7TINII. C; 95014 re) U5:1•U571 a, interest, if Ltny, in any real property that my said wife and I are using as our principal residence at the time of my death. Such residence shall be held, administered, sold, or distributed in accordance with the trust provisions se,: forth hereinbelow. 2. Said trust shall terminate upon the death of my wife, GLADYS BOYER STOCKLMEIP.. Upon the death of my wife, then the Co- Trustees'shall distribute and deliver free of trust, all of the then balance of the trust estate, as follows, to wit: a. On th_reof to my said son, DEAN STOCKLMEIR. b. One-half thereof to my said grandchildren, ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR and JANET L. STOCKLIKEIR, in equal sharps, or to the survivor of them, if either should predecease me or die before the termination of this trust, .end leavt3 no issue surviving. 3. To carry out the purposes of the trust, the Co -Trustees are vested with the following powers in addition to those now or hereafter confirmed by law, affecting the trust and trust estate: a) Whenever the right of any beneficiary to receive payments from net income or principal hereundershallterminate, either by reason of death or otherwise, all such payments accrued or undistributed by the Co -Trustees at the date of such termination shall be distributed in equal shares to the beneficiaries entitled to the successive interest hereunder, orifthey `)e deceased but survived by issue, then to such issue in accordance with the provisions hereof. b) Upon any division of partial or final distribution of the trust estate, and except as herein specifically provided, the Co -Trustees maydivideordistributesuchpropertyinkind, includingundividedintereststherein, or in their absolute discretion the Cc -Trustees may sell all or any part of such property and make such division or distributionincashorpartlyincashandpartlyinkind; and the decision of the Co -Trustees as to what constitutes a proper division of the trust estate either prior to or upon any distribution thereof shall be binding upon all of the beneficiaries. i — 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 J'3 H 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 RON 9T' AW OFFICES s • nu ura r1 nus nun u 1aw.c s u uc PrurIN0. c. 75014 40V - - 253-0531 c) The Ca -Trustees shall have the power, with respect to the property of the trust estate or anypartthereof, and upon such terms and in such manner as they may deem advisable, to sell, convey, exchange, Convert, improve, repair, manage, operate, and control; to lease for terms within or beyond the term of this trust and for any purpose, including exploration for and removal of gas, oil and other minerals; to borrow money for any trust purpose, and to encumber or hypothecate by mortgage, deed of tru_t, pledge or otherwise; to carry insurance of such kinds and in - such amounts as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable, at the expense of the trust; to compromise or otherwise adjust any claims against or in favor of the trust; to commence or defend such litigation with respect to the trust or any property of the trust estate as it may deem advisable, at the expense of the trust; to invest and reinvest the trust mounds in such property as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable; whether or not of the character permitted by law for the investment of trust funds; and with respect to securities held in trust, to vote, give proxies, and pay assessments or other charges, to participate in foreclosures, reorganizations, consolidations, mergers ancf liquidations, and incident thereto to deposit securities with and transfer title to any protective or other committee upon such terms as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable, and to exercise or sell stock subscription or conversion rights; and the Co -Trustees shall have such additional powers as may now or hereafter be conferred upon it by law or as may be necessary to enable the Co -Trustees to administer this trust in accordance with the provisions of this Will, subject to any limitations thereof that may be provided herein. d) The Co -Trustees are authorized to loan or advance their own funds to, the trust for any purpose thereof, at the then current rate of interest, and any such loan or advance, together with interest shall be a first lien against the trust estate and shall be repaid therefrom. e) '2he Co -Trustees may hold securities or other property in this trust in their name as Co -Trustees hereunder, or in their own name, or in the name of their nominee, or the Co -Trustees may hold such securities unregistered in such condition that ownership will pass by delivery. f) Ail property taxes, assessments, fees, charges and other expenses incurred by the Co - Trustees in the administration or protection of this trust, including the compensation allowed by the Court to the Co -Trustees and their attorneys for their services hereunder, shall be a charge upon the trust estate 7— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24: 25 26 27 28 iCMT LAW OFFICES rnn •eiaH t ', r.•ua r ar. 1w• nlewt AV(MIIC ZUP CIN(]• CA 79010 l d+df 75:1.05.11 r I U.0 642 and sha11 be paid by the Co -Trustees in full out of the principal or in full out of the income of the trust estate, or partially out of each of them, in such mangier and proportions as the Co -Trustees in heir absolute discretion may determine to be advisable, prior to final distribution of the trust property; and the determination of the Co -Trustees with respect to all such matters shall be conclusive upon all persons however interested in this trust. g) `Phe Co -Trustees shall have full power and authority to determine, in their ahsclute discretion, what shall constitute principal of the trust estate, gross income .therefrom and net income distributable under the terms of this trust; except as herein otherwise specifically provided, and the determination of the Co -Trustees with respect to all such matters shall be conclusive upon all persons howsoevez interested in this trust. h) No beneficiary of this trust shall have any right to alienate, encumber, or hypothecate his or her interest in the principal or income of the trust in any manner, nor shall such into -est of any such beneficiary be subject to claims of his or her creditors or liable to attachment, execution or other process of j,w. i) I hereby appoint as Co -Trustees of the trust created herein, DEAN STOCKLHEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR. A Trustee shall ;nave the right to resign at any time, and upon such resignation if no successor Trustee be herein designated, the Trustee resigning or any beneficiary of the trust may secure the appointment OE a successor Trustee by a Ccurt of competent jurisdiction, at the expense of the trust. j) The successor of a Trustee, whether through death or resignation as Trustee hereunder, or otherwise, shall forthwith become a successor Trustee hereunder, and shall succeed to all title of a Trustee to the trust estate, and all powers, rights, discretions, obligations, and immunities of a Trustee hereunder, with the game effect as though such successor were originally named herein as Trustee. 4. Any ocher property of the estate not now known or discover, which may belong to the estate, or in which the decedent or the estate may have: any interest, is distributed to DEAN STOCKLMEIR i SP -; 643 1 as to a one-half (1/2) interest therein and to ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR 2 and JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, in equal shares as to a one-half (1/2) 3 interest therein. 4 DATED: , -.,, . „- 1984 5I JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 7 8 9 10 SIO R s 12 a * ' ® tart i copy of, the 0611 A 13 h' r T — A 1 "a ST 14 e% ... - ®. 'County ClerkL • •,' S ta Clara i 15 rir p County 4(t ttl u,as`a Sh Geri a n-atn:e Clam H(tspt gS erior C) a t IiY 1/ A t` LYdISeatiClue DEPUTY16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RosT LAW OFFICES AOROi [\10',L 9_ Q.l3 r ... c —C.U[ CUP[RTINO. CA 95014 40B) 753.0531 All t \ 7`,,3:.}' '.;r w:.s:ui ; I I, :,'j 1_.-.''u:f ):o-rua"_i xi„ky,r_c, c .c .r r. g 1';'FAd' i.. yq ''t ' f'^4: 7 \Y , aI . - - s '1 rg F y' a"T>—' j C T S? , it l ' I tt°. r 4•, i y S%r 1 , 'rye, i i• W - L11 Tt 'X :.1 :ltlil`` . ` I 4 ] qty sf-,,$.,y7,.,': ` gyp, t( I /" '1y y,] 1^, f k L t } i` C.•1 In t'1' i :f9"'+ %-s.i+i' r1TP' t. 1.b.i.., t • 4i,+ 1-, 1 ,T7i •': 7 y'YI Cr - 7' M"T4 f y , .( IY •. 1 yr 4 ra. _,: :rt_f •'•+ .` }'' ' . ^ c' . y y l- ..R LLt:,. 1 • 4 `f!" 'ETeI:' ! `7 E u EEuvu. y , + I::•c [ i { 7;.•'} f' f _ i t' ':•,7'L: ,<' f.'/ ' e ` vax """'t_i y11 ' i,yq" .. Q,.4 t','• t ` . r ••' ` Scn. 3`'' `r ' '''fi i s ` Ur.C.'- .5= s ,• -_ •. ' c-'G_, •',; e`, r'• ss'S1r+t...• `j:f ,i.••,... ' J 7_;.. rte+ !(Q•!',:` / i'T ' r' lr.a N , G 4 f_ _ MFE -'i_, g _ 1 '•''. la: t 'rjt'' ±a I uvy+yy• C43r fF `T t $ ry -.•' , r ,r. :' 'S 4+ Sl,`L"t.tJ I r+t, yl,,, i N. ,6. F,(I '•t'l . t,'' r. M1'l v .r '•"-'P". ;'' S r„'`3 }1 hcar i t'9 j 1; t f n_ ;;'" fi, tY!. 5 . ? p c> :,t t 1 -t i 2' • f ` yy ?' itl_.'l cam. + : , + 5. a'kt, 2'' t 4h Cf riE ~ }{^ •' t 1 a -. F r'.•• .. - rG tI' ---- , 1"' I'':."; irl}'{'h[1.'.,.1''t.,_ , 1!?,-, a', a, I> y4t JR+ ,r' r rT.. €ii •.,, L' X'; cit-L: `. .I;"s' fy a. 1frF.>, `i:' a2'^p.Y, {; " t:`° `Y w . >,<,._ I t - i •• ) ,\i' r {r' Ep v .r, . - 1 µ"+3 jt V, ri S-y y.'• j,t 'i11 i k.[ -, f;'' 1 4 `„ F' 1-' ( F: J r S I q - r , d • i 7r- tt%''y, ,tf. a, S q'`E:Ir yi't I •ii:, le t ,... c'+ 3' Ya• y."` ; ` 1 :.... 4 •[ I''..' g7nS.i . ti ':.7, 3ri„ a^t' , .y'j L' f r'+ kE a'>r - •1 , i t<..+.1 .['r.” ,tl stf u z - ei* , t : kT `ay., yj. ', fi. f + . - ' v. Yi,. 1 . i } 1 r} t +•d .f , L u+' i 9Y t ,. a - i_ Y , r '. Kz yr 7 S4* 1 i/ ^ N t {` y h .t, .•,t` y t . .w > +r : x - _ ,r < , I w :j >;•.....,. fY -1 C } r' S7 ' r ; i• :"•.....%' r e,,°• 1 r ' '>+ Ij Li • * t + J Yk a i" 4 ^w 'i i.; y}p y`' ••'tt. a :, " 1t SL }rd} 5 .t vkS'1Y4` r' " .f• !'i.11l s '+' r cr se e 5 f_ - M _ +': y •t r,;,re ltl t4. C, f. , j F 7 .:,^r,:, yam[ U '';` 4 i ,<., f 4 - ii. `• LC/'G^Fr [ ,v 1 Ci.. "`t' - ` t, ` ,r I,o+ l ,f .i,W',,yy,.< et y • 1 :':: 4' q{ F\ t 1, . r'; i" c } il r• i'o r t 11 . i }ya. pV`''alj '. C!>•8 ' I- +"' ' - ''-' ' . :i ` 1- ' , . 4. 3t" n 1f l r a 7 4y, i•''a'` 4' Z?t{. r # 11 > ' Z s fyrr*s• i 't+i y4r} Y• ig0^ t cij? Try- y,` N;_ ojyk1, '' li + • , L . ` rf' t'' :, tq c t w d , yo- 4•' r J Rr*.'• S 7. t i.% •+i.• - r'' L' p' K {; i t jL,i7 ':yv 9 t _ y i A • . t "5 .E; r i t F• ti : 2 #,.S,T" P l p:. `% h ' ,z .•-,Tib #•_ ' l / ._'''n : c.. ;. •( Y t _ • i7 gyp`_?,t,,, . 1k,,..• f1..^Sti b. ..i"-.-; J+ i. pp . / Lir: a t I St;.' .r '.}1 ci b1W'', _ ', i. r , •" ' : e 1 •, -> s, r y x 4I l' 1`; T rj' A F! i'•iT^" i\+C P, k:i' S. f - f v e . • }.. sj': s] .` • t _ a t' An i ' .'= t 7-•...? t I . ? M. r I is f 1 .'• F f•' . • .' `Xl=/. • t'!: , lJ rt{, A' b' a + i. _ \• F ry 4K t ter, Aerial Photograph August 22, 1960 AERIA YS 8407 Edgewater Drive Ov.Hand, CA 94621 0 (510) 632- ir. IV? - m Aerial Photograph July 15, 1968 IF P A' ILI iq4,.F.aA, W-4iO dio A W, 4 EPA 0 F -J P Vi4141 ho 01 r. DW6iI r vtn 'YY.;fjIg kip Wt Val M T;1 V 2 7- loxfl 4. LLJ V r? tip, 4 IN I 7W01 N. X i. 1.4 Ad 7'. Iwof f. K 3 iL I'A INA fiiE A I!V S;R a AERIAF'1rMEYS 8407 Edge -water Drive 0,-!z1and, CA 94621 - (510) 632-2020 143M Aerial Photograph May 8, 1978 AERIA'FtCIRVEYS 8407 Edgewater Drive O,.!Jr-ind, CA 94621 • (510) 632-2020 1 1Atii.. •,. + Cid`. • ., t y 7,`; .• F,. .7+. , „1• !'j r `, '' nYi ,.fr1,;, '' °. r y r, ,' e J ..f ,, 1T+ . • . 7 ^ ' _. ! `, t emir, i.. 1 4 Lf - i'. 1 :41Y r yr .7} , .,.. 1f J'+ At y 1#,•' ` 1 ; r,j',f•i( F„ ,. fi+. !yaia F!Jc.,dy1 ;l:Y j`•. +.. `i.. ft,f'F 1`; F ! ...+'- 4': l .{e J!'"f=gtis.. ,;`. :Al cItH ?!+. r1., r i' a.i' - ail .:.,, • 1',':k i,•! f 5, •j ••. ,.\, f, J '' i '' r. dy '..•. " ' .w. a ;+ "L f11. +i: 3 ar `y•i l.,JEb" a, i.* ? +rl...i ?,,.?.•f+, , : sm Y 4' s z;,'iK,r `il:E 'i'. '" yr f jl' • II ' gi .E - }t ' fL t_ _ 3 ,1 ' .. J'r 1_. w b•. /f "., , .moii'LI J.I C, .. - _ ,.•„? 1 ..1 J r,: .;z• 4Y s:^,. t• `75y 1G J f + r ty u1IH_! ? P .4 J. a;.i?'93"', r fyj «,1'+Ji r-. T3` S,4t ` y * IT t.JI V. • R. { 1, 1•(., 1111' *. i - J. i 11+ x, 1•• 1 )' y '_ r.. ' iF il .+.` ' 14 4 } ,-" { j F •• I ra - v - ft .f.'a • .¢. wr ,` ; aay__t_N, ti t!s In -4 d; a e ; ! 44 ;,.., t j :-y!S','ti yr; 71,.,? .,ifY af', >> 01 W,•. r T ?• a' r ;i a't `.i • * 'ra L' , til.«y a { ri J [ ..aq'•i+.?r:.. caner ,+ r• '" .".'i1i, i + 4 A wt n . °" ^; 4 n Y14. ! /', R ref •,; ; i,z r'9 ` ; ,.. y . ln . r J`. +, j/f +.l 1•J,_3• 4!`.. 1`.:, SIT w L S. "'i. k', n F =ieJlii' !' :,' r !' # * i. .N°t±. i"aS j! tl i IN L • t. ' a ";. ,M { SII . '- i f _ r f g¢ IF y Y Y EC• i. .. ~. +. i'!tr• ". 3 Y :il '.l+lcr,1'Yl''; A4y +hY+Y" - , A, ljj " p ,ga K,;r 4rC i:. +glon Y. {'c' .'3t•' h' ` - . ; . -" >F$•w`-"r y! F',.T+ :, .fI , s X' ` _ ', e. w "," r• Y + g r r,.,.•la a K ; y1f YL t • 7181 i4! +•i '" w.' `, . K k ..' '+( j' j,' C ,r'. y, V't' 1 a . TJ` i1' S C ti('''i y , .t` y t 1+ k ' • r , ±, xy!•+ s r if -.w -,r ' ii ss{ • , f i . r l h" k. .t^, t.f - '= - 'i L '. ; f - '\'! j ' fill, M1 . i }l1 • '" `t r. }` , R . Jei j .. ° n I ,• ,t 2. f' a 1 aw '-iJ'% '- ''f r' +j i s. k y- 1•j * o. C.l: , `fi' {.i '•`''- y7y _ y. a' f' •. r g 7i j j _ tt. i a + '+A `'•il.'; , .,Y- Y .,, ` n [' a ' i i;"'+"}• '`: `+,,-.,, _.s: r+ i+ 1 `• lr}Y_ 1. t1s-. 1Q lRti1 '. 3 i l 'l4 x : ii `. 1. .ti t r f •le ,. = m M , {. t;:i; . e: a t r ar1 *3. t'! „, 7ql ..;, . ; f , +,, _ tR r : rC.t ' } -, it-; ' . i' i K -' t }y;,y-. Y ;` ( *' ' • 1+ r1 ys- . iyaa '\ frfA rc' l r , j • 1 5 1 qty u jY I•C^' '! w C' ` • it . L . ti' ' 1 •' 'Q i!1 '.. ,/I' . . 11' lrct } .ir ' j . • s p Sr i4\ s YJI 1 ,i .n . ' C .2 " i ` 7 t ,r yN, j..+ J. ', .j 1'x+. } t r, ;, 2 /fl1 s isi• I•..1 . Appendix C EDR Report The EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck° 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Inquiry Number: 359034.1s April 15,1999 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. an.:. edr-company The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary------------------------------------------------------- ES1 Topographic Map--------------------------------------------------------- 2 GeoCheckSummary ------------------------------------------------------ 3 Overview Map----------------------------------------------------------- 5 DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Map Summary - All Sites--------------------------------------------------- 7 Map Summary - Sites with higher or the same elevation as the Target Property--------- 8 MapFindings------------------------------------------------ 9 Orphan Summary-- ------------------------------------ 40 APPENDICES GeoCheck Version 2.1 ----------------------------------------------------- Al Government Records Searched / Data Currency Tracking Addendum- - - - _ _ A13 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer and Other Information This Report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources and Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) makes no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, reliability, quality, suitability, or completeness of said information or the information contained in this report. The customer shall assume full responsibility for the use of this report. NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, SHALL APPLY AND EDR SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF SUCH WARRANTIES. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. COPYRIGHT (C) 1998 BY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks used herein are the property of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. TC359034.1s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-97. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. The address of the subject property for which the search was intended is 22120 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the subject property or within the ASTM E 1527-97 search radius around the subject property for the following Databases: NPL:_________________________ National Priority List Delisted NPL:________________ NPL Deletions RCRIS-TSD:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System AWP: -------------- AWP CHMIRS:_____________________ California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Toxic Pits:___________________ Toxic Pits CERCLIS:____________________ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP:--------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System SWF/LF:--------------------- State Landfill UST:_________________________ Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database Ca. FID:______________________ CA FID AST:_________________________ Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities RAATS:---------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System WMUDS:--------------------- WMUDS/ SWAT RCRIS-SOG:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LOG:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System HMIRS:______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System PADS:_______________________ PCB Activity Database System ERNS: ----------------------- Emergency Response Notification System FINDS:_______________________ Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report TRIS: ------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA: ------------------------ Toxic Substances Control Act MLTS:------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System NPL Lien:____________________ NPL Liens Ca. BEP:_____________________ CA Bond Exp. Plan ROD:------------------------- ROD CONSENT____________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Ca. WDS:-------------------- CA WDS S Bay Reg. 2:________________ South Bay Region 2 Coal Gas:____________________ Former Manufactured gas (Coal Gas) Sites. Unmapped (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. Search Results: Search results for the subject property and the search radius, are listed below: Subject Property: The subject property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Surrounding Properties: Elevations have been determined from the USGS 1 degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. EDR's definition of a site with an elevation equal to the subject property includes a tolerance of -10 feet. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the subject property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the subject property (by more than 10 feet). Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. CAL -SITES: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. A review of the Cal -Sites list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Cal -Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM CORP 23333 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/2 - 1 W 19 34 NOTIFY 65: Notify 65 records contain facility notifications about any release that could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Proposition 65 database. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page ARCO SERVICE STATION #6182 10121 NORTH FOOTHILL BO 1/4 - 1/2W 11 22 CORTESE: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with LISTS having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information. A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 Cortese sites within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM CORP Lower Elevation MEASUREX ANNEX Address 23333 STEVENS CREEK BLV Address 10120 IMPERIAL AVE Dist / Dir Map ID Page 112-1 W 19 34 Dist / Dir Map ID Page 1/4 - 112ESE F16 31 TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally -defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/01/1998 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. Lower Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page ZILOG INC 10460 BUBB RD 1/2 - 1 ESE 18 33 LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/31/1999 has revealed that there are 11 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page FACCIOLA RESIDENCE 22371 CUPERTINO RD 1/8 - 1/4 W A2 9 DENNIS HALL PROPERTY 10104 BYRNE AVE 1/8 - 1/4 ESE B4 13 DENNIS HALL PROPERTY 10104 BYRNE AVE 1/8 - 1/4 ESE B5 15 MOBIL SERVICE STATION 22510 STEVENS CREEK BL, 1/4 - 1/2W 8 16 ARCO 10121 N FOOTHILL BLVD 1/4 - 1/2W D9 19 ARCO #6182 10121 N FOOTHILL BLVD 1/4 - 1/2W D10 22 Lower Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/4 - 1/2 E E12 23 US POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/4 - 1/2E E13 23 HIGDON, ALLEY, KOLB 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE 1/4 - 1/2E 14 27 MEASUREZ CORPORATION 10120 IMPERIAL AVE 1/4 - 1/2 ESE F15 30 MEASUREX CORPORATION 10120 IMPERIAL AVE 1/4 - 1/2 ESE F17 33 HAZNET: The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000, 000 annually, representing approximately 350, 000-500,000 shipments. Data from non -California manifests & continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, & disposal method. The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control is the agency A review of the HAZNET list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 HAZNET sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the subject property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page DAN FACCIOLA LYNN MARKEY Lower Elevation 22371 CUPERTINO RD 10066 BYRNE AVE Address 1/8 - 1/4W Al 9 1/8- 1/4 ESE 3 12 Dist / Dir Map ID Page CLARKS AUTO PARTS & MACHINE 21881 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/8 - 1/4E C6 15 CLARKS AUTO PARTS & MACHINE 21881 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/8 - 1/4E C7 15 TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the CA SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CA SLIC site within approximately 0.5 miles of the subject property. Lower Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page US POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 114 - 112E E13 23 TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name RANCHO SERVICE CENTER TEXACO DONEERVYN'S ARCO SERVICE STATION #495, AT 10550 DEANZA BLVD., ARCO STN #495/10550 DEANZA BLVD STEVENS CREEK(DUMPING LOCATION) KAISER ALUMINU 23333 STEVENS KAISER CEMENT CORP PERMANENTE Database(s) LUST UST HAZNET ERNS ERNS ERNS FINDS S Bay Reg. 2,CA SLIC TC359034.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 359034.1s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. Major Roads Contour Lines Waterways Earthquake Fault Lines Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater Closest Federal Well in quadrant Closest State Well in quadrant Closest Public Water Supply Well 0 1/ 2 1 2 Miles Closest Hydrogeological Data i Oil, gas or related wells TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 /122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:41 am GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 37.322620 - 37° 19'21.4" Longitude (West): 122.060852 - 122° 3' 39.1" Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 10 UTM X (Meters): 583210.6 UTM Y (Meters): 4130872.0 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE Target Property: GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATIONt Geologic Code: Era: System: Series: ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNITt Category: GROUNDWATER FLOW INFORMATION 2437122-C1 CUPERTINO, CA Tpc Cenozoic Tertiary Pliocene Continental Deposits Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. if such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including well data collected on nearby properties, regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers), or surface topography.t AQUIFLOWr"** Search Radius: 2.000 Miles DISTANCE DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP FROM TP Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW General Topographic Gradient at Target Property: General NNE General Hydrogeologic Gradient at Target Property: No hydrogeologic data available. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data*: Search Radius: 2.0 miles Status: Not found FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION WELL DISTANCE QUADRANT FROM TP Northern >2 Miles STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION WELL DISTANCE QUADRANT FROM TP Northern 1/2 - 1 Mile Eastern 1 - 2 Miles Southern 1/4 - 1/2 Mile. Western 1 - 2 Miles STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION API # DISTANCE FROM TP LITHOLOGY Not Reported DEPTH TO WATER TABLE Not Reported NO WELLS FOUND t Source: P. G. Schrubem, R. E. Amdt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U. S. at 1: 2,500,000 Scale -A digital representation of the 1974 P. B. King and H. M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). U. S. EPA Ground Water Handbook, Vol I: Ground Water and Contamination, Office of Research and development EPA/625/6-90/016a,Chapter 4, page 78, September 1990. EDR AOUIFLOWTv information System of hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow directions at specific locations. See the date pages at the end of this report for a complete description. TC359034.1s Page 3 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 SUMMARY PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION Searched by Nearest PWS. NOTE: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. PWS Name: CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Location Relative to TP: 1 - 2 Miles East PWS currently has or has had major violation(s): No AREA RADON INFORMATION EPA Radon Zone for SANTA CLARA County: 2 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Zip Code: 95014 Number of sites tested: 3 Area Average Activity 4 pCi/L 4-20 pCi/L 20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor 0.267 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC359034.1s Page 4 OVERVIEW MAP - 359034.1 s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. Target Property o 1 a 1n 1 Yves 1 Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than Power transmission lines the target property Oil & Gas pipelines A Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) 77,71 100 -year flood zone T-77 National Priority List Sites 500 -year flood zone Landfill Sites TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 /122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:39 am w • mow w www. w w _ _ _ ___ n m_ffi__ I___ Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) X Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites El Landfill Sites 0 1/16 1113 114 Miles Power transmission lines d= a Oil & Gas pipelines 0 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034.1s LAT/LONG: 37.3226 /122.0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8:40 am GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 ADDENDUM FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION BASIC WELL DATA Site ID: Site Type: Year Constructed: Altitude: Well Depth: Depth to Water Table: Date Measured: LITHOLOGIC DATA Not Reported WATER LEVEL VARIABILITY Water Level: 283.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/69 Water Level: 298.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/69 Water Level: 265.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/70 Water Level: 277.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/70 Water Level: 255.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/28/71 Water Level: 266.00 ft. Date Measured: 08/01/71 Water Level: 250.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/01/71 Water Level: 259.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/72 Water Level: 255.00 ft. Date Measured: 01/ 01/73 Water Level: 260.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01!73 Water Level: 218.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/74 Water Level: 198.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/30/74 Water Level: 194.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/75 Water Level: 216.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/76 Water Level: 214.90 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/77 Water Level: 204.10 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/78 Water Level: 184.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/79 Water Level: 208.30 ft. Date Measured: 12/31/81 Water Level: 192. 90 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/83 Well Closest to Target Property (Northern Quadrant) 372130122042301 Distance from TP: 2 Miles Single well, other than collector or Ranney type 280.00 ft. Not Reported County: Santa Clara 189.00 ft. State: California 640.00 ft. Topographic Setting: Valley flat Not Reported Prim. Use of Site: Withdrawal of water Not Reported Prim. Use of Water: Public supply Water Level: 287.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/69 Water Level: 280.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/69 Water Level: 159.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/70 Water Level: 267.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/70 Water Level: 256.00 ft. Date Measured: 04/01/ 71 Water Level: 270.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/71 Water Level: 240.00 ft. Date Measured: 01/01/72 Water Level: 277.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/72 Water Level: 240.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/73 Water Level: 248.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/73 Water Level: 217.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/ 25/ 74 Water Level: 195.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/28/ 75 Water Level: 195.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/28/ 75 Water Level: 190.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/77 Water Level: 201.10 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/77 Water Level: 206.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/12/78 Water Level: 189.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/01/79 Water Level: 202.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/01/82 Water Level: 165.02 ft. Date Measured: 01/ 01/84 Water Level: 290.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/69 Water Level: 274.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/01/69 Water Level: 269.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/70 Water Level: 254.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/31/70 Water Level: 254.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/71 Water Level: 267.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/01/71 Water Level: 241.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/72 Water Level: 279.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/72 Water Level: 266.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/73 Water Level: 133. 00 ft. Date Measured: 01/02/ 74 Water Level: 216.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/74 Water Level: 195. 00 ft. Date Measured: 04/ 30/ 75 Water Level: 184.00 ft. Date Measured: 12/28/ 75 Water Level: 190.00 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/77 Water Level: 194.90 ft. Date Measured: 01/01/78 Water Level: 208.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/78 Water Level: 212.00 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/79 Water Level: 183. 00 ft. Date Measured: 12/29/ 82 Water Level: 303.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/69 Water Level: 268.00 ft. Date Measured: 01/ 01/70 Water Level: 275.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/70 Water Level: 250.00 ft. Date Measured: 02/01/71 Water Level: 255.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/01/71 Water Level: 260.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/71 Water Level: 241.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/72 Water Level: 258.00 ft. Date Measured: 10/31/72 Water Level: 270.00 ft. Date Measured: 07/01/73 Water Level: 131.00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/74 Water Level: 214.00 ft. Date Measured: 11/01/74 Water Level: 214.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/30/ 75 Water Level: 179. 00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/76 Water Level: 189.00 ft. Date Measured: 06/01/77 Water Level: 193. 90 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/78 Water Level: 186. 00 ft. Date Measured: 03/01/79 Water Level: 240.10 ft. Date Measured: 09/01/81 Water Level: 175. 90 ft. Date Measured: 05/01/83 TC359034.1s Page Al Water Wells: GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Well Within 1/2 - 1 Mile of Target Property (Northern Quadrant) Water System Information: Prime Station Code: E43/018-SCVWDMA FRDS Number Number: 4310018005 District Number: 05 Water Type: Surface Water Source Lat/Long: 371945.0 1220324.8 Source Name: SCVWD - MANN CONNECTION System Number: 4310018 System Name: City of Cupertino Organization That Operates System: Precision: 10300 TORRE AVE Source Name: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Pop Served: 18200 Area Served: CUPERTINO Water System Information: User ID: HEN County: Santa Clara Station Type: RESVR/CANAUAMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Well Status: Combined Treated Precision: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Connections: 4199 Well Within 1 - 2 Miles of Target Property (Eastern Quadrant) Prime Station Code: 07S/02W-13C01 M User ID: HEN FRDS Number Number: 431 0001 01 5 County: Santa Clara District Number: 05 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT/MU N/I NTAKE/SU P PLY Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/Long: 372000.0 1220200.0 Precision: Undefined Source Name: WELL 024-01 System Number: 4310001 System Name: CWSC Los Altos Suburban Organization That Operates System: 949 B Street Los Altos, CA 94024 Pop Served: 53940 Connections: 17895 Area Served: LOS ALTOS Sample Information: * Only Findings Above Detection Level Are Listed Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 680.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 7.310 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 247.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 300.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 400 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 140 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE TC359034.1s Page A2 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 280. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 72.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 24.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 720 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 1.300 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 33.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 6.000 UG/L Chemical: LITHIUM Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 020 UG/L Chemical: FOAMING AGENTS (MBAS) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 383.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 120 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 20.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 005 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 12/30/1980 Findings: 060 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 20.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 660. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 7.410 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 249.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 303.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 500 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 190 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 264.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) TC359034.1s Page A3 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 55.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 31.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 36.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 960 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 900 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 29.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 160 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 39.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 160.000 UG/L Chemical: BARIUM Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 10.000 UG/L Chemical: LITHIUM Sample Collected: 10/ 13/1982 Findings: 387.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 140 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 15.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 017 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 10/13/1982 Findings: 150 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 20.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 2.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 640.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 7.300 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 257.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 312.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 400 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 190 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE TC359034.1s Page A4 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 262.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 57.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 29.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 42.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 1.130 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 180 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 26.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 08/ 15/1984 Findings: 388.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 060 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 14.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 016 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 08/15/1984 Findings: 300 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 3.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 670.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 7.450 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 265.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 322.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 170 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 263.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) TC359034.1s Page A5 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 60.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 27.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 43.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 1.150 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 39.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 190 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 411.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 250 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 16.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 018 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 11/19/1986 Findings: 100 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 1.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 670. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 7.450 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 237.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 288.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 140 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 277.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 64.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM TC359034.1s Page A6 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 29.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 760 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 34.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 170 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 382.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 06/ 02/1988 Findings: 100 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 17.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06/02/ 1988 Findings: 006 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 06/02/1988 Findings: 150 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 2.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 645.000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 7.510 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 243. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 295.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 220 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 260.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 59.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 25.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM TC359034.1s Page A7 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 37.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 1.000 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 1.100 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 34. 000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 200 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 34. 000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 120.000 UG/L Chemical: BARIUM Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 391.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 130 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX Q SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 17.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 07/ 08/1991 Findings: 007 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 07/08/1991 Findings: 300 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 04/08/1992 Findings: 2.500 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA Sample Collected: 04/08/1992 Findings: 1.300 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR Sample Collected: 03/22/1993 Findings: 7.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 06/30/1994 Findings: 2.600 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA Sample Collected: 06/ 30/1994 Findings: 1.700 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 20.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 4.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 656. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 7.640 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 248.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 300. 000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY TC359034.1s Page A8 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 900 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 210 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 254.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 57.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 26.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 46.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 1.260 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 1.400 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 40.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 230 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 32.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 134.000 UG/L Chemical: BARIUM Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 404.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 280 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 16.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 021 UG/L Chemical: IODIDE Sample Collected: 10/27/1994 Findings: 150 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) Sample Collected: 01/20/1995 Findings: 3.400 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA Sample Collected: 01/20/1995 Findings: 2.000 PCI/L Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR Sample Collected: 03/ 07/1995 Findings: 17.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 03/ 26/1996 Findings: 14.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 18.000 C Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 5.000 UNITS Chemical: COLOR TC359034.1s Page A9 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 567. 000 UMHO Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 7.480 Chemical: PH (LABORATORY) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 236. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 287.000 MG/L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 600 MG/L Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 100 UG/L Chemical: PHOSPHATE Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 282.000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS (AS CAC03) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 64.000 MG/L Chemical: CALCIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 27.000 MG/L Chemical: MAGNESIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 31.000 MG/L Chemical: SODIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 31.000 Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 1.600 MG/L Chemical: POTASSIUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 41.000 MG/L Chemical: CHLORIDE Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 130 MG/L Chemical: FLUORIDE (TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 28.000 MG/L Chemical: SILICA Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 150.000 UG/L Chemical: IRON Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 12.000 UG/L Chemical: NICKEL Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 56.000 UG/L Chemical: ALUMINUM Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 382. 000 MG/L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 129 Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP. Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 14.000 MG/L Chemical: NITRATE (AS NO3) Sample Collected: 11/10/1997 Findings: 600 NTU Chemical: TURBIDITY (LAB) TC359034.1s Page A10 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION Well Within 1/4 - 1/2 Mile of Target Property (Southern Quadrant) Water System Information: Prime Station Code: 07S/02W-15R01 M User ID: 43C FRDS Number Number: 4300751001 County: Santa Clara District Number: 73 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/Long: 371905.0 1220319.0 Precision: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Source Name: WELL 01 System Number: System Number: 4300751 System Name: System Name: BLACKBERRY FARMS Organization That Operates System: Organization That Operates System: 298 GARDEN HILL DR. 21975 SAN FERNANDO AVE. LOS GATOS, CA 95030 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Pop Served: Pop Served: 3600 Connections: 1 Area Served: Not Reported Sample Information: * Only Findings Above Detection Level Are Listed Sample Collected: 09/ 25/ 1986 Findings: 1.600 UG/L Chemical: CHLOROFORM (THM) Sample Collected: 10/24/1986 Findings: 760 UG/L Chemical: CHLOROFORM (THM) Sample Collected: 04/06/1987 Findings: 850 UG/L Chemical: CHLOROFORM (THM) Well Within 1 - 2 Miles of Target Property (Western Quadrant) Water System Information: Prime Station Code: 07S/02W-09Q11 M User ID: HEN FRDS Number Number: 4300812001 County: Santa Clara District Number: 05 Station Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/Long: 371954.0 1220506.0 Precision: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Source Name: WELL 01 System Number: 4300812 System Name: SCC P&R, Rancho San Antonio Organization That Operates System: 298 GARDEN HILL DR. LOS GATOS, CA 95030 Pop Served: 40 Connections: 1 Area Served: RANCHO SAN ANTONIO COUNTY PARK TC359034.1s Page A11 GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION Searched by Nearest PWS PWS SUMMARY: PWS ID: CA4310018 PWS Status: Active Distance from TP: 1 - 2 Miles Date Initiated: June / 1977 Date Deactivated: Not Reported Dir relative to TP: East PWS Name: CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Addressee / Facility: Not Reported Facility Latitude: 371923 Facility Longitude: 122 01 51 City Served: CUPERTINO Treatment Class: Mixed (treated and untreated) Population Served: 10,001 - 50,000 Persons PWS currently has or has had major violation(s): No TC359034.1s Page Al2 Appendix D Environmental Agency Information Requested and Obatined CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consuRing One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 16, 1999 Ms. Teresa Lee Bay Area Air Quality Management District Public Information 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Lee: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any air emission complaints or permits on file with your agency for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. OC D Andria Pomponi Staff Planner O:\US ERS\POM P.QNI\CUPERT— I \FOIA. W PD Bay Area Air Quality Management District 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Attention: Public Records Administration Division FAx. (415) 749-5911 California Public Records Act Request Name of Company Requesting Records: Date: C - N r r _- in Address . L r L -ti- r . ve . . Y e C i n 1 u- (4V5/ Zhu odd Who shoa!d we call if we have a question? Qts Contact: Po N[ , b Telephone: ci Please complete one copy of the back of this form for each facility or site for which you are requesting records, and mail or fax to the address shown above. Within 10 calendar days of receiving your request, we will fill your request, or you will be advised of the reason we are unable to fill it. If you have questions, please call (415) 749-4784 for record request assistance. The following are not considered public records: Any trade secret so designated by a permitted facility. Any complainant's name or address. Any record pertaining to personnel names or fiscal files subject to audit. District publications or subscriptions available by fee (including selected computer compilation printouts, as listed on "Record Request Form" and provided only as public information). Any non-specific record (i.e., requested without facility name or other identification). REPLY TO YOUR PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST Enclosed are the records you requested. We have located the records you requested and they exceed the number of pages which the District provides at no charge. The cost is $ for pages at $0.10 per page. The records will be forwarded upon receipt of the amount due. Please make your check or money order payable to BAAQMD. Your check should reference Invoice Number and should be sent to: Business Office Bay Area Air Quality Management District 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 q We are unable to provide the records you requested. S &ck ire ;s x]' A search was made but no records were found. I a c situ z ns Cc e2 -+L r itio CA( ] A search was made but the requested item is not ava"[ a&e becau6e it is not a public record. We are unable to find the record you requested because the request did not include sufficient information to find it. G:IRDWIPRAI.doc --11/26/96 CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center l engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 20, 1999 Will Bruhns Public Assistance Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region 1515 Clay Street, #1400 Oakland, California 94612 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Mr. Bruhns: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation on file with your agency for the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Mobile Service Station Zilog Inc. 22510 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10460 Bubb Road Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Kaiser Alumninum & Chemical 23333 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA_ 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Kaiser Cement Corp. 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. ax4u ° Andria Pomponi Staff Planner O:\USERS\POM PONI\CUPERT- I \FOIA. W PD STATE OF CALIFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY GEORGE DEUKME)IAN, Govemor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 2151 BERKELEY WAY BERKELEY, CA 94704 April 8, CAUFORN1A REGjoNA1 WATFR APR 13 Mr. Phil Bobel, Chief QUALM CONTROL BOARDWasteManagementSection US EPA Region IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94132 Dear Mr. Bobel: This letter is to request your concurrence with this Department's intention to issue a public notice and accept public comment regarding closure of the Zilog, Inc. facility which was located at 10640 Bubb Road, Cupertino, California. The Department has determined that the Zilog facility was closed in a manner consistent with Title 22, California Administrative Code, and that said closure was certified by the facility operator and an engineer duly registered to practice in the State of California. Based on information available at this time, the Department of Health has further determined that no contamination resultingfromZilog's activities remains at the site. There are, however, small concentrations of residual contaminants of uncertain origin in the soil. The Department therefore is proposing to permit closure of the Zilcg facility, with no requirement for Zilog to pursue additional closure or post closure activities at this time. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Daniel E. Murphy at (415) 540-2043. Since- ly, Dwi ht R Hoenig, Chief North Coast California Section Toxic Substances Control Division cc: Roger James, RWQCB-SF Debbie Johnson, EPA DRH:dem:na iTATE OF CALIFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gov,mor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION 2151 BERKELEY WAY, ANNEX 7 BERKELEY, CA 94704 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Pirooz Lahij i Director of Facilities Zilog Corporation 210 Hacienda Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Lahiji: October 13, 1988 ALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER OCT 18 QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ZILOG FACILITY, 10640 BUBB ROAD, CUPERTINO, EPA ID NO. CAD 076314459 We have received the engineer's certification that your facility has been closed in accordance with your approved closure plan. This letter is your acknowledgement that the Department now considers the Zilog hazardous waste storage facility, EPA ID No. CAD 076314459 officially closed. Please beadvised that this acknowledgement of facility closure is not a certification that your facility does not pose any environmental -or public health threat. This letter does not remove any liabilities associated with the past hazardous waste management practices which occurred on the site. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Daniel E. Murphy at (415) 540-3545. Sincerely, DwiAt. /Hoenig,Chi Region 2 Toxic Substances Control Division Cert. Mail No. P 888 746 057 cc: Christy Camp, U.S. EPA -Region IX Steve Ritchie, SF Bay-RWQCB DRH:DEM:re CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 20, 1999 Jeanette Townsend Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, CA 95118 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Townsend: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency for the following sites. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Kaiser Cement Corporation 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regardine, this matter, please call me at (925) 296- 8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. a Andria Pomponi Staff Planner STATE OF CALIFORNIA lofts CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD PE -E vrI:SGN SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION 2101 WEBSTER STREET Suite Soo i OAKLAND CA 94612 Tel. 15101 286.1255 FAx 15101286.1361) December 21. 1995 File No. 2188.20 (JRW10H.) Mr. Phil Gaynor tic ,C RB File No 43-1860 Kaiser Cement Corporation 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard ' Cupertino, CA 95014 I i Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certificate for 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Cupertino, CA Dear Mr. Gaynor. This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage tanks formerly located at the location described above. Enclosed Is the Case ClosureSummaryforthereferencedsiteforyourrecords. Based upon the available information, including the current land use. and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions. no furtheractionrelatedtotheundergroundtankreleaseisrequired This notice is issued pursuant to a regulation contained in Title 23. California Code of Regulations. Division 3. Chapter 16, Section 2721(e). If a change in land use is proposed. the owner must promptly notify this agency Please contact John West at (510) 286-1247 or Logan Hansen at (510) 286-6733 if you have anyquestionsregardingthismatter Attachment: Case Closure Summary cc w/attch: James Crowley, SCVWD Jim Blarney, SCCDEH Sincerely, Loretta K. Barsamian Executive Officer Z'; Stephen I. Morse Chief, Toxics Division i r SITE CLOSURE SUNLMARY ^ I. AGENCY INFORMATION Date De.emhcr 21. 149s AFencs lame S F B R W Q C B .Address 2101 Webster Street City State Zip Oakland- CA 94612 PMmc 1510) 286.1255 Responsible Staff Person John R West. U,gan Hansen Title Ensironmenul Specialist III Student Intern Il. SITE LN -FORMATION Site Facihn Name Kaiser Cement Corporation. Scrvi;c Sution Site Facility Address 24MI Stevens Creek Boulevard. Cuperiino. CA 95013 RB SMS Case No 33-1660 Lucal or LOP Cax No Pnpnn 1132 I URF Filing Date 2'22 9.1 SWEEPS No Responsihle Partie, nncludc addre,ws and Phone numbers- Phil Gaynor Kaiser Cement Corparauon 23001 Snscns Creek Bpuleyard. Cu rnn,. CA 95111. I Ph. (408) 996-4266 Tank No. Size in Gallons Contents Closed In—Place'Removed'. I Date 1 10.000 Diesel Rcmoscd I 11 ID 9- I 10.0110 Gasuhnc Removed IO.O(K) Gau+hne Remosed I! Ib 91 111_ RELEASE AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION INTORSIATION Cau,e and Tspe of Release Unknown Site characterization complete' Yes Date Approved By Oyersi ht Aeencc Monitoring wrils installed' No Number Proper crecned mmnal' Highest GW Depth Below Ground Surface. Lowest Depth Flow Direction cost Sensitive Current Use. Most Sensitive Potential Use and Probabiliry of Use Are drinking water wcl!, affected' Aquifer lame Is surface water affected' Nearest Affected SW Name Off -Site Bcnefi:ial Use Impacts (Addresses Locations)' Reponisi on file' 1'es Where is rerKlrtm filed' S FR W Q C B r- nrr, Y wr., 1 IV. CLOSURE Due, e0m ICiCJ ;arrnusc anon Protea evsane henclmal uses per the Rcemnal Hoard Ba,m Plan' Y., Dues compicicJ :orre,u,c a, tion protea potential heneli,ial u,e, r, the Rerwnai h—rJ Ha,m Pl.ir.' 1 e Does curretuse action prvtcct puhhi health for current land usc' Yc, II I Site Manaeenient RegwrcmcnL No s ectal re uirement% I Monitoring Wells De,ommss)oned N A \umber Decummi%,wned ur..hcr Rct.,incd List Enforcement Acnnns Taken None taken List Enforcement Axiom Rescinded None rcxmdc l TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF .AFFECTED MATERIA!. Material Amount (Include Units) Action (Treatment or Disposal —Destination) j Date Tank 1 10.(Xt0 Callon Removed and di%posed (Iucatton unkn,,wm I I I v, Tank '_ 10.0kW) calion Remoscd and disfx,wd dc>`auun unknowm l l IS" Tank i IU.(XV Callan Remmed and ds )scd (location uni:now-n) j 11 Ih tai Piping Unknown Removed and dispsiscd docauon unknowm 11 Ih 9i I ki.AXI%IU%l DO''CMENTED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS—B[FORE AND AFTER CLLANI'P POLLl7A.\7 Soil (ppm) Before Atter Nater (ppb) Soil (ppm) POLLIT.\7 Before After Before After t Nater ( phi iBeforeAfter TPH )Gas) 22 NA' N A• N A Xsl= u' NAcnr N A N A i TPH iDinelr U V \ A \ A EN\Ihcntrne NA I N Bctucnr 5' N A N A N A 0)I S Grca,c N\ NA j N Toluene h' NA N A N A Hca,s sicuis NA NA N A i I Comments (Depth of Remediation- etc.): am Ie taken from ,io:kpilc of o,creicasated sml tram tank Pit I ND= Nun-dctc.t \A= A= Not aprI),ahlc I IV. CLOSURE Due, e0m ICiCJ ;arrnusc anon Protea evsane henclmal uses per the Rcemnal Hoard Ba,m Plan' Y., Dues compicicJ :orre,u, c a,tion protea potential heneli,ial u,e, r, the Rerwnai h—rJ Ha,m Pl.ir.' 1 e Does curretuse action prvtcct puhhi health for current land usc' Yc, II I Site Manaeenient RegwrcmcnL No s ectal re uirement% I Monitoring Wells De,ommss)oned N A \umber Decummi%,wned ur..hcr Rct.,incd List Enforcement Acnnns Taken None taken List Enforcement Axiom Rescinded None rcxmdc l I V. TECHNICAL REPORT CORRESPONDENCE ETC..MAT Tiffs L. ,SURE RECO%INIENDATION AAS BASED L'PON Title: Sampling Repon, Sequoia Analytical 11 19 91 Uinuthorized Release Form ]'_'Ga vI. ADDITIONAL CO\OIENTS, DATA. ETC. PLLASL IACLLDE ATTACH THE rot LOW DA AS APMOMIATL I-SrI 4AP 1%O 41`1w TA%A Mr UA AT"O%MO TMI. WELL LIX AT— D.I, I ADw 1711 LMAMt-T 17f .. Sri r(.fuSwOATHNOtMTIrt L G AIILA OF I SIDLA A)Lt:"H ;1 r 11P. ArL DLI_ .171, P. 1'' On Nosemher 19.1993. three IO.M1 Fallon Underground Stange Tanks IUSTsi. one used to hold diesel and twos used to hold gasoline were closed and removed from the subject site Nicole Jakahy, of the Sanu Clara County Envi,onmental Health Department was present to observe removal and sampling Two, wnl sample, were Lakcn from heneath each CST pit and three composite samples of the stockpiled soils were Laken Anal\srs of the samples taken from hencath the tanks resulted in a maximum conccintranon of one part(+" per million Ippm) for Total Petroleum H%drozatte,n% ITPNI The stockpile samples had a maximum lysyl of TPH at ]_ ppm Benzene. Toluene. Ethylbenzene. and Xylene (BTEX) concentrations were well below one ppm or not detected in all samples Conclusion Regional Board Suit re.,,mmend the cxc lar closure sm:e only minor IcsclA o11 TPN were klund :n the sod samples from the tank pit and residual podluwm ,lac% not appear to posy a threat it, water qualm ,or human health and safes 7 C' f fes-' CO 2 ti This document and the related CASE CLOSURE LETTER. shall he retained Is, the lead agen:y as pan oMe off": — _ sue file fV m Jf^ v .r h1 ® 1 r, V 64Mp Tye . yy,' Liry HC e March 2, 1999 Mr. Earl Bouse Hanson Peramente Cement P.O. Box 309 3000 Busch Road Pleasanton, CA 94566 Dear Mr. Bouse: Subject. Fuel Leak Investigation at Kaiser Cement, 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA Per our February 26, 1999, telephone conversation, I am forwarding to you a copy of the Santa Clara Valley Water District (District's) February 7, 1997, letter and additional information. The staff at California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) closed the portion of this case that involves gasoline tanks (Upper Service Station). The remaining source areas to be addressed are listed below and documented in our enclosed letter. Please prepare and submit a work plan to define the extent of contamination in the Lower Service Station and Emergency Generator areas. TECHNICAL COMMENTS 1. There are five former source areas at this site: Lower Service Station Emergency Generator Garage Oil House Upper Service Station 2. Lower Service Station Area Prepare a work plan to define the extent of soil and groundwater pollution associated with four removed 1,000 gallon diesel tanks. Following tank removal, reportedly floating product was observed on water in the tank pit and excavated soils contained strong diesel fuel odors. Reportedly, no samples were collected from this area and the excavation was backfilled. Emergency Generator Area Define the extent of soil and groundwater pollution associated with one removed 4,000 gallon diesel tank. Following tank removal, reportedly the tank appeared undamaged with no apparent leaks, but the associated connecting lines and plumbing showed obvious leakage. Excavated soils contained diesel odors and the excavation contained product. No samples were collected and the excavation was backfilled. 4. Garage and Oil House Areas No further work is necessary. Mr. Earl Bouse 2 March 2, 1999 Upper Service Station Area No further work is necessary; The RWQCB granted closure for this area December 21, 1995. However, if you are no long utilizing the groundwater monitoring wells installed in this area, you should properly abandon them. Contact Mr, Dave Zozaya in the District's Well Services Unit, 408) 927-0710, extension 2650. It appears that three groundwater monitoring wells were installed near the existing underground storage tanks. 6. Because closure has been granted for the only gasoline tanks at your site, it is not necessary to repeat the analyses for fuel oxygenates in your next investigation. However, it will be necessary to analyze soil and groundwater samples for the gasoline additive Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE), and to report the analytical results in your data tables, as well as include the laboratory analytical results for all samples analyzed If analytical results for samples yield positive results under method 8020, we suggest you use confirmation analyses, with analytical method 8260 or comparable, to confirm the presence of MTBE at your site. A typical way of defining the extent of contamination near and in former source areas is to install soil borings and to collect soil and groundwater samples for analysis, at depth intervals of 5 feet and at significant lithologic breaks. In order to define the vertical extent of contamination, it is necessary to collect samples until either: you reach groundwater and collect a grab groundwater sample for analysis, or obtain non-detectable analytical results for petroleum hydrocarbon contamination to a significant depth in the soil. In order to define the lateral extent of contamination, it is necessary to install borings laterally from the source areas until analytical results for samples indicate significant contaminant attenuation with distance from the source area. REQUEST Prepare a work plan to address comments 1 and 2 above, due no later than April 16, 1999. This request is made pursuant to the Regional Water Quality Control Board's authority under Section 13267 of the California Water Code. If you have any questions, please call me at (408) 265-2607, extension 2639. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Adele R Shepherd Water Quality Specialist Leaking Underground Storage Tank Oversight Program Enclosures cc/enc: A. Shepherd cc: D. Zozaya PT:gs:FL03 01 g L CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 20, 1999 Freedom of Information Act Contact California Environmental Protection Agency 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 525 Sacramento, CA 95814 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Freedom of Information Act Contact: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency for the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Facciolo Property Lynn Markey Property 22371 Cupertino Road 10066 Bryne Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Clark Auto Parts & Machine Measurex Annex 21881 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10120 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. amotuo Andria Pomponi Staff Planner V w. u. 4 California Environmental Protection Agency m Air Resources Board a Department of Pesticide Regulation • Department of Toxic Substances Control Integrated Waste Management Board • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Winston H. Hickoz State Water Resources Control Board a Regional Water Quality Control Boards Gray DavisSecretaryforGovernor nvironmental rotection April 28, 1999 Ms. Andria Pomponi Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. One Walnut Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Pomponi: We have received your letter requesting information dated April 20, 1999, regarding "any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency ..." as stated in your letter. After reviewing the files of the Office of the Secretary, no records relevant to your request were discovered. You may wish to contact one or more of our constituent entities regarding your request individually to determine if they have pertinent information. For your information, the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) consists of the following entities: Office .of the Secretary (to which your request was sent) Air Resources Board Department of Pesticide Regulations Department of Toxic Substances Control Integrated Waste Management Board Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment State Water Resources Control Board Regional Water Quality Control Boards I have enclosed a list of contacts for public records requests at each Board, Department, and Office within Cal/EPA. If you have any questions regarding the Office of the Secretary, please contact me at (916) 327-2064. Sincerely, L19's F. Brown Acting Deputy Secretary for Law Enforcement and Counsel Enclosure 555 Capitol Mall a Suite 525 a Sacramento, California 95814 0 (916) 445-3846 a Fax: (916) 445-6401 Printed on Recycled Paper r_ CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 16, 1999 Mr. Donald White Freedom of Information Act Officer United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region IX Office of Public Affairs 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request via fax: 415-744-1605 I Dear Mr. White: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information in your files for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. Andria Pomponi Staff Planner 0:\USERS\POM P.ONI\C UPERT- I \FOIA. W PD UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Z = REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105.3901 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Freedom of Information Act RIN-9- /S - J / Your Reference: / ,, 0 (_r P l The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) -database lists those regulated facilities that have notified EPA as hazardous waste generators, transporters or treatment, storage or disposal facilities under RCRA. This database may not contain all the potential hazardous waste s tes that exist or that are regulated by state and local agencies. Your request also has been sent to other appropriate divisions of EPA, who will answer you directly. The information you have requested is not in the EPA Region 9 RCRA L__- 1 database e_ or hardcopy files. If you consider this response to be a denial, you may appeal it by addressing your written appeal to the Freedom of Information Officer (A-101), United States Environmental Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20460. California, Arizona and Nevada are RCRA program in lieu of EPA and we appropriate state agency to request attached). COMMENTS: now authorized to conduct the suggest that you contact the up-to-date information (list If you have additional questions regarding your request, please contact Jacqueline Jennings, or Bridget Coyle, at (415) 744-2029. Si,1aqerejy BrVdgef jV(5yl'X, Section Chief FAX #: 415/744-1605 Data M' gem nt & Analysis I 1. Printed on Regrled Paper CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. consulting One Walnut Creek Center engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 construction Walnut Creek, California 94596 operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174 April 30, 1999 Ron Baker External Affairs Department of Toxic Substances Control 10151 Croydon Way, Suite 3 Sacramento, CA 95827 Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Mr. Baker: Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information regarding any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency for the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessment of fees up to $25 for this request. Facciolo Property Lynn Markey Property 22371 Cupertino Road 10066 Bryne Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Clark Auto Parts & Machine Measurex Annex 21881 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10120 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (925) 296-8064. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. Gf 0- ; r7 Andria Pomponi Staff Planner O F F I C E 0 F' N I A 9 BOOK 357 9. 6.62 2 za NI 2 4r _` S2 mI 5/ 5 \ 4 ' 3 _ 1p -j -/00/2- J J T O N 23 m 3 2 6BK G 27 60 28 emn 9 9 0 5425 Cn Z Zo 5 55 25 75.12 O a1 23 4 n 00 l Qrn 56- 7 6, 2 JOK K 870 O.R. 1249 m P Q a4 o kz o Compiled in conformance with sec 327 of the 5 S R. k T. code. For assessment purposes only. E rNottve For Roy! Yec 19 9 8— 9 9 2 c` LAWRENCE E. STONE — ASSESSOR A T 6.62 2 za NI 2 4r _` S2 mI 5/ 5 \ 4 ' 3 _ 1p - j -/ 00/2- J J T O N 23 m 3 2 6BK G 27 60 28 emn 9 9 0 5425 Cn Z Zo 5 55 25 75.12 O a1 23 4 n 00 l Qrn 56- 7 6, 2 JOK K 870 O.R. 1249 m P Q a4 o kz o Compiled in conformance with sec 327 of the 5 S R. k T. code. For assessment purposes only. E rNottve For Roy! Yec 19 9 8— 9 9 2 c` LAWRENCE E. STONE — ASSESSOR Condition of Approval 45 Provide Evidence of Non-occupancy of Historical Society Caretaker Residence in lieu of conditions 43 and 44 Condition of Approval 45 Provide Evidence of Non-occupancy of Historical Society Caretaker Residence in lieu of conditions 43 and 44 1 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Instead of Requiring Modern Pollution Controls Santa Clara County Conditions of Approval for Lehigh Cement Removes Residents from the Oldest Home in Cupertino In 2000, the Cupertino Historical Society acquired the oldest home in Cupertino, the historically-important 1881 Snyder Hammond House, with a caretaker (see page 4 for Snyder Hammond family history). A historical organization taking over this home was welcome news: Cupertino Historical Society saved the last of the old Cupertino area Victorian era homes from demolition by purchasing it from the Catholic Diocese of San Jose for $1.00 (see page 5 for article). The sale of the home was included in the land sale package of the Oak Valley housing development, adjacent to Rancho San Antonio. Following nearly two decades of ownership, the Cupertino Historical Society has neither installed a plaque at the home nor featured a permanent story about it on their website. On at least one occasion, the home’s caretaker gave a talk at one of their events. Around 2006, the Permanente Quarry, owned by HeidelbergCement Group, Germany, began dumping mining overburden near the historic Snyder Hammond House (see photo page 4) on top of the former headquarters of Permanente Metals (later Kaiser Aluminum) where, in the past, employees would take their families to picnic on weekends. Photos demonstrate that the company started by Henry J. Kaiser was very proud of its headquarters (attached). The buildings were badly damaged during a suspicious fire on April 26, 1993.1 The mining overburden formed a permanent artificial mountain of mining waste now known as the EMSA, the East Materials Storage Area. This new mountain is visible when entering Rancho San Antonio Preserve and from Cupertino’s main street, Stevens Creek Blvd. The EMSA has been the subject of lawsuits, including one between the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and Santa Clara County. Among the Open Space District’s concerns, the County had allowed construction of the EMSA, which now generates water pollution,2 without the benefit of planning.3 The Open Space District4 and Water Boards5 have since requested better selenium water pollution measures. The December 2011 Lehigh Reclamation Plan described air quality problems from its Permanente Quarry.6 Since the oldest home in Cupertino became the most impacted residence by air pollution, Lehigh expressed interest in having the occupied historic home empty in order to continue running polluting equipment in lieu of installing modern pollution controls. Because the Cupertino Historical Society had Lehigh Hanson personnel as its members, this plan was feasible. Thus, the County Final Conditions of Approval (COA) provide either evidence of Lehigh installing modern pollution equipment (COA 43, 44) or vacating the Cupertino home (COA 45).7 These COAs have been continuously memorialized as recently as the 2018 Lehigh Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment Conditions of Approval Compliance Annual Report Information Package (see Annual Report page 12, footnote 2). The full text of the relevant 2012 Final COAs are on the following page.8 1 Cronk, Michael. “Cement Plant Fire Raises Plume of Smoke,” San Jose Mercury News, April 28, 1993 2 Water testing results at end of 2018 Lehigh Annual Report sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/2250_AR6.pdf 3 August 13, 2014 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District board meeting agenda provides a lawsuit summary openspace.org/CGI-BIN/agendas_minutes/2014.08.13.Lehigh_settlement_R_14-98.pdf 4 Letter from Open Space District requesting improved selenium pollution abatement at EMSA sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/2250_PC_20160728_Item5_Supplemental_MROSD.pdf 5 San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. “Revised Water Code Section 13267 Technical Report Order Requiring Submittal of Information on Selenium Concentrations in the Permanente Plant Discharges and in Permanente/Stevens Creeks,” April 26, 2017, waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water_issues/hot_topics/Lehigh/update/Revised_Water_Code_Section_13267_Techn ical_Report_2017_04_26.pdf 6 December 2011 Lehigh Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2010042063, section 4.3, Air quality, pdf p 38 sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/Lehigh_DEIR_201112_Ch4_03_AirQuality.pdf 7 Final Conditions of Approval Approved by Planning Commission, June 7, 2012 and modified by the Board of Supervisors on June 26, 2012 FILE NUMBER 2250-13-66-10P-10EIR (M1): COA 43 – 45, pdf p12 sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/Lehigh_20120607_COA_Final.pdf 8 Final Conditions of Approval Approved by Planning Commission, June 7, 2012 and modified by the Board of Supervisors on June 26, 2012 FILE NUMBER 2250-13-66-10P-10EIR (M1), COA 43 – 45, pdf p 9 sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/Lehigh_20120607_COA_Final.pdf 2 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 2012 Lehigh Reclamation Plan Amendment Final Conditions of Approval 43 – 45: 43. Within 90 days of final RPA approval, the Mine Operator shall submit to the County and BAAQMD a comprehensive inventory of all RPA-related off-road construction equipment expected to be used during any portion of the RPA period. The inventory shall include the horsepower rating, engine production year, and projected hours of use or fuel throughout for each piece of equipment. The inventory shall be updated and submitted annually to the Planning with the Annual Report, throughout the duration of the RPA. (Implements Mitigation Measure 4.3-3a). 44. Within 90 days of final RPA approval, the Mine Operator shall provide a plan for approval by the Planning Manager and BAAQMD demonstrating that off-road equipment to be used for Reclamation of the EMSA would achieve an average 35 percent reduction in Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) emissions compared to the proposed fleet described in the ALG report (Ashworth Leininger Group, December 13, 2011) during RPA Phase I. The plan shall be updated and submitted annually to the Planning Manager, with the Annual Report each year throughout the duration of the RPA. Options for reducing emissions may include, but are not limited to: a. Using newer model engines (e.g. engines that meet US EPA interim/final Tier 4 engine standards). b. Use of Retrofit Emission Control Devices that consist of diesel oxidation catalysts, diesel particulate filters, or similar retrofit equipment control technology verified by CARB (www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/verdev.htm) c. Use of low emissions diesel products or alternative fuels; d. Use of alternative material handling options (e.g. conveyor system); or other options as may become commercially available and verifiable. (Implements Mitigation Measure 4.3-3b). 45. In lieu of Condition No. 43 and No. 44 (Mitigation Measures 4.3-3a and 4.3-3b), the Mine Operator may submit within 90 days of the RPA approval evidence establishing to the Planning Manager’s satisfaction that there are legally binding restrictions precluding any occupancy of the caretaker’s residence located at 2961 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 342-63-003) during the entirety of Phase I of the Project. (Implements Mitigation Measure 4.3-3c). COA #45 was selected and the Cupertino Historical Society removed the caretaker and his family from the historically-significant 1881 Snyder Hammond house, the oldest residence in Cupertino. In late 2012, the County received a copy of the lease demonstrating the home’s vacancy (attached, the author is presently unable to find the link to it on the Santa Clara County website) and the San Jose Mercury News described the transaction as bringing new life to one of Cupertino’s oldest homesteads (see article page 6). Note that both the COA and the lease list the wrong street address, 2961 rather than 22961. The City of Cupertino General Plan refers to the Snyder Hammond House on its Historic Resources Map and as the second of thirteen Historic Site photographs with the address of 22961 Stevens Creek Blvd. Additionally, the General Plan has three policies pertaining to historic sites, LU-6.1, LU-6.2, and LU-6.3. Policy LU-6.2 states: "Projects on Historic Sites shall meet the Secretary of Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties."9 These standards are described on the National Parks Services U.S. Department of the Interior web page: nps.gov/tps/standards.htm. Having a home unoccupied is never a good idea and the home’s vacancy enabled the subsequent demise of Cupertino's Historic Site, removed an affordable home from Cupertino housing inventory, and exposed Cupertino citizens to more pollution. The lease agreement stipulates that the tenant is required to take care of the property but the tenant has allowed it to be vandalized. Finally, the Cupertino Historical Society has failed to maintain the home under Cupertino General Plan Policies and other ordinances. The City of Cupertino should intervene. 9 Cupertino General Plan, Historic Resources Map (item #2, page LU-26, pdf page 78), Hammond House photograph and address (page LU-27, pdf page 79), Land Use Policies LU 6.1 – 6.3 (page LU-24, pdf page 76) 64.165.34.13/WebLink/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=566706&dbid=0&repo=CityofCupertino 3 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Location of the Snyder Hammond House and More Information Historic 1881 Snyder Hammond House (Google Earth) This page provides images of the setting of the Snyder Hammond House and is followed by: a) History of the Snyder Hammond House b) 2001 Article: Announcing the Purchase of the Oldest Home in Cupertino c) 2012 Article: Lehigh “saves” historic house d) Photos of historic setting (no page numbers) e) Lease agreement that satisfies Condition of Approval (no page numbers) General location 280 x Foothill (Google Maps) Assessor’s Parcel: APN 342-63-003 Site Address: 22961 Stevens Creek Bl Cupertino CA 95014 Jurisdiction: Incorporated (Cupertino) Recorded Size: 1 acres Source: sccplanning.org/gisprofile/ Notice the Hammond Snyder Loop Trail. John Snyder’s home was nearby and his daughter’s home is called the Snyder Hammond home. On older maps, the road adjacent to the house is called St. Joseph Avenue. Earlier assessor maps list the address as 10185 N. Stelling Road (the address of the Cupertino Historical Society). close-up map view (Google Maps) 4 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 History of the Snyder-Hammond House and Family Home While Occuppied Mountain of Mining Waste Behind Home In 1881, John Snyder (1828 – 1901), built this home on his ranch for his daughter Martha and her husband Dr. W. H. Hammond. John Snyder purchased the ranch in 1861 and it originally had over 1200 acres. It was located 4 miles from Mountain View Station (in the area that we now know has Rancho San Antonio). Snyder moved west in 1849 and accidentally discovered the Scott River and gold while searching for his lost ponies. In 1855 he married Martha Kifer (John Kifer’s daughter, a name you might recognize from Kifer Road). John and Martha had five children: - Sarah Ann (who married William Foss); - Arthur J. a Mountain View orchardist; - John H.; - Martha B (who married Dr. Hammond and lived in the house shown above. They had one daughter Muriel who married Raymond Haynes); and - Letitia (who married E. F. Kendall, a Los Altos orchardist, well known for being on the railroad line). John Snyder’s 1862 grain crop was the first to be raised in the county and he did it without irrigation; he inspired others to do the same. He also grew prunes and owned other properties. John’s daughter Martha, also known as Mattie, was born at "Hillside," Permanente Creek, Mountain View. Martha’s husband, Dr. W. H. Hammond graduated from medical school in 1879 and practiced medicine for a year in Hawaii. Hammond had taught school until he had sufficient funds to attend medical school at the University of the Pacific in San Francisco (later, the school later changed names to Cooper Medical College and eventually became part of Stanford University). For two terms, he was County Physician for the county of Santa Clara. He also had other business interests such as owning orchards and other real estate. Biographical References: John Snyder: santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/jsnyderpen.html santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/jsnyder.html Martha Kifer: John Snyder’s wife (no bio links) Martha Hammond, John and Martha’s daughter, who lived in the house shown santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/mbhammond.html Dr. W. H. Hammond, Martha’s husband santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/whhammond.html Mrs. Letitia Pearl Snyder Kendall, John Snyder’s daughter santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/lpkendall.html William Foss, Sarah’s husband, Principal of the public school at Mountain View in 1875. santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/fremontalleybios.html Arthur J. Snyder, a Mountain View orchardist and John H. Snyder, were John’s sons. E. F. Kendall, Letitia’s husband, a Los Altos orchardist. santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/efkendall.html Mrs. Sarah Foss, John Snyder’s Daughter santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/safoss.html 5 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Announcing the Purchase of the Oldest Home in Cupertino Palo Alto Stanford Heritage, Summer 2001 pastheritage.org/Images/News/2001%20news/2001SummerWeb.pdf 6 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Announcing the Rental of the Oldest Home in Cupertino to Lehigh (now the home is in disrepair) mercurynews.com/ci_22095004/partnership-restores-saves-cupertinos-snyder-hammond-house Partnership restores, saves Cupertino’s Snyder-Hammond house Matthew Wilson| Bay Area News Group November 29, 2012 at 1:05 pm New life has been given to one of Cupertino’s oldest homesteads. The Cupertino Historical Society and Lehigh Southwest Cement have a long-term agreement to use the old Snyder-Hammond house as a storage location for artifacts from the days when Henry Kaiser presided over cement manufacturing in the Cupertino foothills. The historical society wrote in its latest edition of The Cornerstone newsletter that the house is Cupertino’s oldest remaining farmhouse. The agreement between Lehigh Cement and the historical society began in mid- September. The house was purchased by the historical society from the Catholic Diocese of San Jose in 2002 for just $1 to save it from being razed during the Oak Valley development in the northwest Cupertino foothills, according to the newsletter. Since that time, the home was under contract with a caretaker and his family. The home was becoming increasingly uninhabitable, and the historical society does not have the money to upgrade the property and make repairs for public use, according to the newsletter. The society instead chose to partner with Lehigh on the condition that the house only be used for storage of Kaiser historical artifacts. “Lehigh and Hanson before us have always supported the historical society. We’ve always had a close relationship,” said Sandra James, Lehigh’s community affairs director and a longtime community volunteer and former mayor. “We needed a place to store our historical artifacts, and they have this wonderful building. The possibility is here for a good partnership.” As compensation, Lehigh donated funds that equate to approximately $1,100 a month for the next nine years. The historical society will still be able to store some of its own items in the house and use it for special events. There have also been tentative plans over the years to relocate the home if enough donations are gathered. In 2009 and parts of 2010, the historical society’s mini-museum at the Quinlan Community Center included a display featuring artifacts and historical accounts of Kaiser’s era at what is now Lehigh Cement. Many of the artifacts from that display will be housed in the Snyder-Hammond house. Lehigh Cement has plenty of regional history in its own right. Nearby Permanente Road has been there since the late 1890s and mining at the site dates back to that era. Cement production began just before World War II. The facility was owned by Hanson Permanente and Kaiser Cement Corporation before becoming part of the Heidelberg Cement Group in 2007. Condition of Approval 45 Provide Evidence of Non-occupancy of Historical Society Caretaker Residence in lieu of conditions 43 and 44 1 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Instead of Requiring Modern Pollution Controls Santa Clara County Conditions of Approval for Lehigh Cement Removes Residents from the Oldest Home in Cupertino In 2000, the Cupertino Historical Society acquired the oldest home in Cupertino, the historically-important 1881 Snyder Hammond House, with a caretaker (see page 4 for Snyder Hammond family history). A historical organization taking over this home was welcome news: Cupertino Historical Society saved the last of the old Cupertino area Victorian era homes from demolition by purchasing it from the Catholic Diocese of San Jose for $1.00 (see page 5 for article). The sale of the home was included in the land sale package of the Oak Valley housing development, adjacent to Rancho San Antonio. Following nearly two decades of ownership, the Cupertino Historical Society has neither installed a plaque at the home nor featured a permanent story about it on their website. On at least one occasion, the home’s caretaker gave a talk at one of their events. Around 2006, the Permanente Quarry, owned by HeidelbergCement Group, Germany, began dumping mining overburden near the historic Snyder Hammond House (see photo page 4) on top of the former headquarters of Permanente Metals (later Kaiser Aluminum) where, in the past, employees would take their families to picnic on weekends. Photos demonstrate that the company started by Henry J. Kaiser was very proud of its headquarters (attached). The buildings were badly damaged during a suspicious fire on April 26, 1993.1 The mining overburden formed a permanent artificial mountain of mining waste now known as the EMSA, the East Materials Storage Area. This new mountain is visible when entering Rancho San Antonio Preserve and from Cupertino’s main street, Stevens Creek Blvd. The EMSA has been the subject of lawsuits, including one between the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and Santa Clara County. Among the Open Space District’s concerns, the County had allowed construction of the EMSA, which now generates water pollution,2 without the benefit of planning.3 The Open Space District4 and Water Boards5 have since requested better selenium water pollution measures. The December 2011 Lehigh Reclamation Plan described air quality problems from its Permanente Quarry.6 Since the oldest home in Cupertino became the most impacted residence by air pollution, Lehigh expressed interest in having the occupied historic home empty in order to continue running polluting equipment in lieu of installing modern pollution controls. Because the Cupertino Historical Society had Lehigh Hanson personnel as its members, this plan was feasible. Thus, the County Final Conditions of Approval (COA) provide either evidence of Lehigh installing modern pollution equipment (COA 43, 44) or vacating the Cupertino home (COA 45).7 These COAs have been continuously memorialized as recently as the 2018 Lehigh Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment Conditions of Approval Compliance Annual Report Information Package (see Annual Report page 12, footnote 2). The full text of the relevant 2012 Final COAs are on the following page.8 1 Cronk, Michael. “Cement Plant Fire Raises Plume of Smoke,” San Jose Mercury News, April 28, 1993 2 Water testing results at end of 2018 Lehigh Annual Report sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/2250_AR6.pdf 3 August 13, 2014 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District board meeting agenda provides a lawsuit summary openspace.org/CGI-BIN/agendas_minutes/2014.08.13.Lehigh_settlement_R_14-98.pdf 4 Letter from Open Space District requesting improved selenium pollution abatement at EMSA sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/2250_PC_20160728_Item5_Supplemental_MROSD.pdf 5 San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. “Revised Water Code Section 13267 Technical Report Order Requiring Submittal of Information on Selenium Concentrations in the Permanente Plant Discharges and in Permanente/Stevens Creeks,” April 26, 2017, waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water_issues/hot_topics/Lehigh/update/Revised_Water_Code_Section_13267_Techn ical_Report_2017_04_26.pdf 6 December 2011 Lehigh Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2010042063, section 4.3, Air quality, pdf p 38 sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/Lehigh_DEIR_201112_Ch4_03_AirQuality.pdf 7 Final Conditions of Approval Approved by Planning Commission, June 7, 2012 and modified by the Board of Supervisors on June 26, 2012 FILE NUMBER 2250-13-66-10P-10EIR (M1): COA 43 – 45, pdf p12 sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/Lehigh_20120607_COA_Final.pdf 8 Final Conditions of Approval Approved by Planning Commission, June 7, 2012 and modified by the Board of Supervisors on June 26, 2012 FILE NUMBER 2250-13-66-10P-10EIR (M1), COA 43 – 45, pdf p 9 sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/Lehigh_20120607_COA_Final.pdf 2 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 2012 Lehigh Reclamation Plan Amendment Final Conditions of Approval 43 – 45: 43. Within 90 days of final RPA approval, the Mine Operator shall submit to the County and BAAQMD a comprehensive inventory of all RPA-related off-road construction equipment expected to be used during any portion of the RPA period. The inventory shall include the horsepower rating, engine production year, and projected hours of use or fuel throughout for each piece of equipment. The inventory shall be updated and submitted annually to the Planning with the Annual Report, throughout the duration of the RPA. (Implements Mitigation Measure 4.3-3a). 44. Within 90 days of final RPA approval, the Mine Operator shall provide a plan for approval by the Planning Manager and BAAQMD demonstrating that off-road equipment to be used for Reclamation of the EMSA would achieve an average 35 percent reduction in Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) emissions compared to the proposed fleet described in the ALG report (Ashworth Leininger Group, December 13, 2011) during RPA Phase I. The plan shall be updated and submitted annually to the Planning Manager, with the Annual Report each year throughout the duration of the RPA. Options for reducing emissions may include, but are not limited to: a. Using newer model engines (e.g. engines that meet US EPA interim/final Tier 4 engine standards). b. Use of Retrofit Emission Control Devices that consist of diesel oxidation catalysts, diesel particulate filters, or similar retrofit equipment control technology verified by CARB (www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/verdev.htm) c. Use of low emissions diesel products or alternative fuels; d. Use of alternative material handling options (e.g. conveyor system); or other options as may become commercially available and verifiable. (Implements Mitigation Measure 4.3-3b). 45. In lieu of Condition No. 43 and No. 44 (Mitigation Measures 4.3-3a and 4.3-3b), the Mine Operator may submit within 90 days of the RPA approval evidence establishing to the Planning Manager’s satisfaction that there are legally binding restrictions precluding any occupancy of the caretaker’s residence located at 2961 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 342-63-003) during the entirety of Phase I of the Project. (Implements Mitigation Measure 4.3-3c). COA #45 was selected and the Cupertino Historical Society removed the caretaker and his family from the historically-significant 1881 Snyder Hammond house, the oldest residence in Cupertino. In late 2012, the County received a copy of the lease demonstrating the home’s vacancy (attached, the author is presently unable to find the link to it on the Santa Clara County website) and the San Jose Mercury News described the transaction as bringing new life to one of Cupertino’s oldest homesteads (see article page 6). Note that both the COA and the lease list the wrong street address, 2961 rather than 22961. The City of Cupertino General Plan refers to the Snyder Hammond House on its Historic Resources Map and as the second of thirteen Historic Site photographs with the address of 22961 Stevens Creek Blvd. Additionally, the General Plan has three policies pertaining to historic sites, LU-6.1, LU-6.2, and LU-6.3. Policy LU-6.2 states: "Projects on Historic Sites shall meet the Secretary of Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties."9 These standards are described on the National Parks Services U.S. Department of the Interior web page: nps.gov/tps/standards.htm. Having a home unoccupied is never a good idea and the home’s vacancy enabled the subsequent demise of Cupertino's Historic Site, removed an affordable home from Cupertino housing inventory, and exposed Cupertino citizens to more pollution. The lease agreement stipulates that the tenant is required to take care of the property but the tenant has allowed it to be vandalized. Finally, the Cupertino Historical Society has failed to maintain the home under Cupertino General Plan Policies and other ordinances. The City of Cupertino should intervene. 9 Cupertino General Plan, Historic Resources Map (item #2, page LU-26, pdf page 78), Hammond House photograph and address (page LU-27, pdf page 79), Land Use Policies LU 6.1 – 6.3 (page LU-24, pdf page 76) 64.165.34.13/WebLink/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=566706&dbid=0&repo=CityofCupertino 3 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Location of the Snyder Hammond House and More Information Historic 1881 Snyder Hammond House (Google Earth) This page provides images of the setting of the Snyder Hammond House and is followed by: a) History of the Snyder Hammond House b) 2001 Article: Announcing the Purchase of the Oldest Home in Cupertino c) 2012 Article: Lehigh “saves” historic house d) Photos of historic setting (no page numbers) e) Lease agreement that satisfies Condition of Approval (no page numbers) General location 280 x Foothill (Google Maps) Assessor’s Parcel: APN 342-63-003 Site Address: 22961 Stevens Creek Bl Cupertino CA 95014 Jurisdiction: Incorporated (Cupertino) Recorded Size: 1 acres Source: sccplanning.org/gisprofile/ Notice the Hammond Snyder Loop Trail. John Snyder’s home was nearby and his daughter’s home is called the Snyder Hammond home. On older maps, the road adjacent to the house is called St. Joseph Avenue. Earlier assessor maps list the address as 10185 N. Stelling Road (the address of the Cupertino Historical Society). close-up map view (Google Maps) 4 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 History of the Snyder-Hammond House and Family Home While Occuppied Mountain of Mining Waste Behind Home In 1881, John Snyder (1828 – 1901), built this home on his ranch for his daughter Martha and her husband Dr. W. H. Hammond. John Snyder purchased the ranch in 1861 and it originally had over 1200 acres. It was located 4 miles from Mountain View Station (in the area that we now know has Rancho San Antonio). Snyder moved west in 1849 and accidentally discovered the Scott River and gold while searching for his lost ponies. In 1855 he married Martha Kifer (John Kifer’s daughter, a name you might recognize from Kifer Road). John and Martha had five children: - Sarah Ann (who married William Foss); - Arthur J. a Mountain View orchardist; - John H.; - Martha B (who married Dr. Hammond and lived in the house shown above. They had one daughter Muriel who married Raymond Haynes); and - Letitia (who married E. F. Kendall, a Los Altos orchardist, well known for being on the railroad line). John Snyder’s 1862 grain crop was the first to be raised in the county and he did it without irrigation; he inspired others to do the same. He also grew prunes and owned other properties. John’s daughter Martha, also known as Mattie, was born at "Hillside," Permanente Creek, Mountain View. Martha’s husband, Dr. W. H. Hammond graduated from medical school in 1879 and practiced medicine for a year in Hawaii. Hammond had taught school until he had sufficient funds to attend medical school at the University of the Pacific in San Francisco (later, the school later changed names to Cooper Medical College and eventually became part of Stanford University). For two terms, he was County Physician for the county of Santa Clara. He also had other business interests such as owning orchards and other real estate. Biographical References: John Snyder: santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/jsnyderpen.html santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/jsnyder.html Martha Kifer: John Snyder’s wife (no bio links) Martha Hammond, John and Martha’s daughter, who lived in the house shown santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/mbhammond.html Dr. W. H. Hammond, Martha’s husband santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/whhammond.html Mrs. Letitia Pearl Snyder Kendall, John Snyder’s daughter santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/lpkendall.html William Foss, Sarah’s husband, Principal of the public school at Mountain View in 1875. santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/fremontalleybios.html Arthur J. Snyder, a Mountain View orchardist and John H. Snyder, were John’s sons. E. F. Kendall, Letitia’s husband, a Los Altos orchardist. santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/efkendall.html Mrs. Sarah Foss, John Snyder’s Daughter santaclararesearch.net/SCBIOS/safoss.html 5 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Announcing the Purchase of the Oldest Home in Cupertino Palo Alto Stanford Heritage, Summer 2001 pastheritage.org/Images/News/2001%20news/2001SummerWeb.pdf 6 Rhoda Fry | fryhouse@earthlink.net | 3/6/2019 Announcing the Rental of the Oldest Home in Cupertino to Lehigh (now the home is in disrepair) mercurynews.com/ci_22095004/partnership-restores-saves-cupertinos-snyder-hammond-house Partnership restores, saves Cupertino’s Snyder-Hammond house Matthew Wilson| Bay Area News Group November 29, 2012 at 1:05 pm New life has been given to one of Cupertino’s oldest homesteads. The Cupertino Historical Society and Lehigh Southwest Cement have a long-term agreement to use the old Snyder-Hammond house as a storage location for artifacts from the days when Henry Kaiser presided over cement manufacturing in the Cupertino foothills. The historical society wrote in its latest edition of The Cornerstone newsletter that the house is Cupertino’s oldest remaining farmhouse. The agreement between Lehigh Cement and the historical society began in mid- September. The house was purchased by the historical society from the Catholic Diocese of San Jose in 2002 for just $1 to save it from being razed during the Oak Valley development in the northwest Cupertino foothills, according to the newsletter. Since that time, the home was under contract with a caretaker and his family. The home was becoming increasingly uninhabitable, and the historical society does not have the money to upgrade the property and make repairs for public use, according to the newsletter. The society instead chose to partner with Lehigh on the condition that the house only be used for storage of Kaiser historical artifacts. “Lehigh and Hanson before us have always supported the historical society. We’ve always had a close relationship,” said Sandra James, Lehigh’s community affairs director and a longtime community volunteer and former mayor. “We needed a place to store our historical artifacts, and they have this wonderful building. The possibility is here for a good partnership.” As compensation, Lehigh donated funds that equate to approximately $1,100 a month for the next nine years. The historical society will still be able to store some of its own items in the house and use it for special events. There have also been tentative plans over the years to relocate the home if enough donations are gathered. In 2009 and parts of 2010, the historical society’s mini-museum at the Quinlan Community Center included a display featuring artifacts and historical accounts of Kaiser’s era at what is now Lehigh Cement. Many of the artifacts from that display will be housed in the Snyder-Hammond house. Lehigh Cement has plenty of regional history in its own right. Nearby Permanente Road has been there since the late 1890s and mining at the site dates back to that era. Cement production began just before World War II. The facility was owned by Hanson Permanente and Kaiser Cement Corporation before becoming part of the Heidelberg Cement Group in 2007. WRT to McClellan Road Bridge, the slide should show ~$2.2M in City Funding until other funding is found. We made the assumption that we would have more funding from elsewhere with Jollyman Park and that did not happened and us taxpayers wound up funding it. In the name of transparency, please for now have that $2.2M come from City Funds. There is a bridge on Stevens Creek Blvd that is in worse condition than the McClellan Bridge near the Golf Course. This bridge was eligible for Federal Funds (where as the McClellan Bridge was not). What is the status of that bridge? REGARDING CITY-OWNED PROPERTIES Please do know that you can’t tell from the photo that the Byrne property is on a very steep slope. Right after the house and the 1-car garage is a steep hill that makes the property a challenge to build on. Sadly the property has become blighted since the City purchased it. Many of the beautiful plants and trees are gone. We had a plan for the Torre Annex, please let’s work that plan! That will allow the City to make seismic repairs to City Hall. This has been going on for way too long. Regarding the Stocklmeir property, it was in beautiful condition when the City purchased it and has fallen into disrepair. In the 2005 General Plan, it was protected as a Historic Site. At a minimum, let’s bring the exterior of that property up to its previous condition. It is against the General Plan to allow historic sites to fall into disrepair. It is tragic that the home of our first City’s historian has been allowed to become degraded in this way. Please find attached an assessment of the property when it was first purchased. Separately, Cupertino’s most historic home, that was owned by the County’s physician, the Sara Cody of his day, was leased by the historical society to Lehigh so that Lehigh could avoid installing modern pollution equipment. That home has also fallen into disrepair. Attached are documents that I have put together regarding the sad state of this property. Regards, Rhoda Fry Virus-free.www.avg.com From:Santosh Rao To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk Subject:03/19/24 city council meeting. Agenda item 1: Please DO NOT approve agenda item 1. Bollinger Rd bike lane study. Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:23:51 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. [CC: City clerk] Dear Mayor Sheila and honorable council members, I implore you to please REJECT and DO NOT APPROVE the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. (Agenda item 1 on 03/19/24 city council meeting). Please also DO NOT approve any other bike lane spend at this time such as DeAnza, McClellan, Steven’s Creek Blvd. There are 70k+ residents in Cupertino and vast majority of them use autos to get around. Please do NOT disrupt this critical East-west corridor connecting DeAnza to Lawrence and beyond and vice versa. Please do NOT approve the study to explore elimination of one lane each direction. Please REJECT agenda item 1. At this time of budget deficit I beseech you to kindly prioritize any and all spend to maximize the number of residents benefitted. How many bicyclists do you have compared to residents using autos. How many residents drive on Bollinger compared to bicyclists. Why do you need to eliminate lanes when you can encourage and identify alternate roads with less traffic for sections of bike lane connectivity. An inordinate amount of city funds have been spent on bike lane projects. You would think public works capital projects are largely only bike lane projects. This project has never come before city council before for agenda item discussion and public input at council. The very first time it is on agenda it seeks funding approval for the study. This project is even marked low priority by public works. Why does this make the cut if low priority. Please REJECT this agenda item 1. I understand that part of the funding is intended to be covered via grant money. I ask that you kindly REJECT this and do not proceed with the Bollinger Rd project. We do not want the grant money going towards causing massive inconvenience to residents. Please apply available grants for pedestrian safety instead such as beacon activated pedestrian crossings, new pedestrian crossings. You can be sure that my family voters will be aware of this issue on November elections and will be carefully watching how November election candidate Hung Wei will vote on this issue as well as Kitty Moore assuming they are seeking public office for their roles again. We will vote on this issue as well as other issues that demonstrate council members alignment with common sense and average residents needs or their leaning towards small and niche groups that may have valid needs but simply is not pragmatic in such cases to disrupt roads like Bollinger. While on the topic I also urge you to cancel the remaining spend on Steven’s Creek, DeAnza, McClellan Rd bike lane spend. Enough has been spent on bike lanes. It’s time to spend on the rest of us residents. Thank you for keeping the average resident in mind and the maximum impact of every dollar spent including grant fund dollars. Hoping to see you vote to NOT APPROVE agenda item 1 or any bike lane project today at the council meeting. Thanks, Santosh Rao (Cupertino resident) From:Seema Lindskog To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Safety Study and Design CIP project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:08:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I am writing today to urge you to include the Bollinger Rd Safety Study in this year's CIP projects list. This project is one of the few safety improvement projects on the CIP list. There were two fatalities and one serious injury on this road. It is critical that we complete the study and explore possible designs for making the road safer for all residents. Eighty percent of the study cost is paid for by a grant, so it's also a good fiscal decision for the city. Thousands of students go to school using Bollinger to go to Hyde, Lynbrook, and Murdock- Portal. Today, the vast majority of them drive because the road is not safe for students to bike to school. There are so few pedestrian crossings and they are so far from each other that the road is not pedestrian or transit friendly either. In some places, seniors and young families can't safely cross the road because it is too wide. Many of the residents who live on Bollinger struggle to even back out of their driveway safely because of the fast moving cars. They fear for the safety of their children and pets if they wander out unaccompanied. It's one of the few east-west connectors in the city and it's been a big safety problem for years for residents living on Bollinger, students, seniors, cyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. I know some residents are writing in against the Bollinger Road Safety Study because they are worried that the city will slow down the cars and cost the drivers a few more minutes. But this CIP project does not fund any construction. That is not what you are voting on today. There will be more opportunities for resident input when designs are being considered and when a final design is brought in front of council. It is premature to kill the project now. Please prioritize resident safety and vote to include the Bollinger Road Safety Study in this year's CIP list. Thank you for everything you do for this city. Best regards, Seema Lindskog ___________________________________________________________________ "You must be the change you want to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi This message is from my personal email account. I am only writing as myself, not as a representative or spokesperson for any other organization. From:Shaohua Yang To:City Clerk Subject:objection to reducing Bollinger road lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:19:35 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, My name is Shaohua Yang, and I am writing to object to the proposal of reducing car lanes on Bollinger Road. It is a bad idea as the road is busy for school and commuting to work. Thanks! Regards, Shaohua From:Shaoyu Lu To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Resident Letter to Oppose Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:28:53 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council Members or to Whom it may concern, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bollinger Road Corridor Design to shrink the car lane from 2 to 1. We live in the Lynbrook High School district. Our kid goes to Cupertino School District elementary school everyday. Bollinger Road is the closest big road to our house. We drive on Bollinger everyday. But this proposed Bollinger Road Corridor Design would greatly increase the traffic congestion, and it would have a devastating impact on our community. The Bollinger road is located in the heart of our community, connecting many popular schools in our community, for example, Lynbrook High School, Hyde Middle School, Miller Middle School, Dilworth Elementary School and Murdock Elementary School. These schools serve a big population of Cupertino and West San Jose residences. Every morning, I see cars waiting in a long line on Bollinger road trying to get in and out of these schools. Now I can use the second lane to go through the traffic, but if you change the bollinger road to a single car lane, we have to stay in the single car lane forever. And our kids will be late for school. We will be late for work! Moreover, Cupertino City is currently short of funds for many good design proposals, for example, for schools , libraries and parks. Please at least delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design! I urge you to vote against the Bollinger Road Corridor Design in today’s meeting! It would be a mistake that we would regret for many years to come. Please put my comments into the public record. Sincerely, Shaoyu Lu From:Shiv Shah To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:50:15 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sent from Mail for Windows From:Shu-ping Yeh To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Support of Alternative B for Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:16:28 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I am writing to express my view on the Bollinger Road Study. I am NOT in support of Plan A, which reduces the lanes from 4 to 2. As an almost daily driver on Bollinger, I can tell that the increased congestion will make it intolerable, and the #1 accident type in the City's analysis (Rear-end collision) will only increase. Thank you. Shu-ping Yeh From:someday To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:No on Bollinger Road fund allocation Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:06:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, Please postpone the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please don't start the Bollinger Road Corridor Design right away. What is wrong with the Cupertino City and Council ? Where are your brains? Do you know how crowded Bollinger Road is? Please put my comments into the public record. Thank you! Cathy From:Staci Hung To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Bollinger Road Study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:38:21 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi City of Cupertino, I am writing to express my view on the Bollinger Road Study. I am NOT in support of Plan A, which reduces the lanes from 4 to 2. As a driver on Bollinger frequently, I can imagine the increased congestion will make it intolerable, and potentially more accidents on Bollinger Road. Please reconsider the decision. Staci Hung Residence of Cupertino in Wilson Park area From:Steve Yu To:City Council Subject:Bollinger Road project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:11:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear council members, Bollinger Road is a major conduit between De Anza and Lawrence Expressway. Removing 2 lanes could severely impacting the traffic and creating major congestion during rush hours. The change would be very costly and difficult to revert if the result seems to be unsatisfactory. It would be prudent and more cost effective if we selectively choosing needed locations for safety improvements. Best regards, Tsunglun (Steve) Yu 10491 Davison Ave Cupertino, CA 95014 From:Susan Michael To:City Clerk Subject:FW: March 19 2024 CC Study Session Item 1 CIP 5 yr plan Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:14:25 PM Attachments:image009.png image010.png image011.png image012.png image013.png image014.png image015.png image016.png FYI Susan Michael Capital Improvement Programs Manager Public Works SusanM@cupertino.gov (408)777-1328/(408)510-0622 From: Lisa Warren <la-warren@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:07 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org> Cc: Susan Michael <susanm@cupertino.org>; Chad Mosley <chadm@cupertino.org>; Matt Morley <mattm@cupertino.org> Subject: March 19 2024 CC Study Session Item 1 CIP 5 yr plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. City Council and Staff, Please do not continue with any studies or projects related to the Bollinger Rd Corridor RE-Design. This is low priority item/project that has not at all benefited from public comments and outreach. I believe that the survey as well as the traffic study were done 'during Covid' which we all should understand was not a good time to get useful data. Any study performed in the past and particularly during a dramatic decrease of cars on the roads due to pandemic, will be entirely inadequate. In addition to that, a survey that is completed during the same pandemic period is not useful for a project like this. Top that with the fact that both Cupertino and San Jose are currently, and will continue to, increase both full time resident AND daytime/commuter residents. This will dramatically increase the number of automobiles, and potentially other modes of transportation (bike, bus, etc). Any study performed in the past and particularly during a dramatic decrease of cars on the roads due to pandemic, should be considered very poor data. Limiting Bollinger Rd. to one driving lane in each direction would risk creating a situation where commuters/drivers will choose routes thru neighborhood streets to avoid a very congested main artery that would basically become a neighborhood street with far too many automobiles. Both Lawrence Expy and DeAnza Blvd, and likely Miller Ave will be more congested in the not so distant future and with Bollinger being one of the connecting, and well used arteries, the result could very well be that these roadways suffer greatly in the congestion index. Bollinger is also a route that public safety vehicles use.... they need room to get around traffic !!! AND... we, as a city, have higher priorities and NOT enough money. Thank you ' Lisa Warren frequent driver in and about these streets. From:Susan Yahoo To:City Council Subject:Road safety Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:30:48 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please ignore the requests to dismiss item 1 on the agenda. Bike safety is paramount to the safety of the city residents and important to our future of our city. Thank you! Susan Cupertino Resident From:Suyash Ganu To:Sheila Mohan Subject:Bollinger Traffic Study Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:17:54 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan, My name is Suyash Ganu and I am a graduate of Cupertino High School and a former De Anza College student. I grew up biking on Bollinger and taking VTA Bus 25 along the same corridor. As a student, I had many close encounters with cars drifting too close to the bike lane and taking unsafe right turns without checking for me in the blindspot. In addition, many residents leave their trash cans in the bike lane making it incredibly dangerous. For this reason, I want to encourage the City to support the Bollinger Road Design and Traffic Analysis CIP item. The safety and health of our residents should be prioritized. Cupertino has already had fatalities on not just Bollinger but also Tantau and Wolfe in the past few years. I want my future children to grow up in a Cupertino where kids are safe to bike in. I absolutely loved the protected bike sections on Stevens Creek near Cupertino High School and appreciate the city for installing those. I still see a lot of traffic during school drop off which signals to me that many parents do not feel bicycling is safe. It is imperative that we make biking safe not only to reduce traffic but to also increase the health of our youth at a time when child obesity is rising. A traffic study on Bollinger would be a sign that the Cupertino City leadership is taking the safety of children into account. Making Bollinger safer would make it easier for kids at Cupertino, Hyde, Sedgewick, Lynbrook, Miller, and even De Anza College to get to school on time safely. Creating better infrastructure would also benefit our adult population as well. Cupertino is required by the state government to build more housing. Creating good bike instructure would be integral to reducing traffic in this scenario. I hope that given the immense potential for improving Bollinger, you consider moving forward with traffic study. Thank you for considering my input, and your work on behalf of Cupertino. From, Suyash Ganu From:Swapna Deshpande To:City Council; City Council Cc:City Council; City Council Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:28:06 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. From:Taghi Saadati To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:29:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is even difficult. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds. This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Sent from my iPhone From:Tao Shui To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Delay Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:06:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear city council members, please postpone the city’s Bollinger Road Corridor project until you get more feedbacks from the city’s residents. As an Apple employee, parent of Cupertino school district student and resident close by (I am living in Dumas Dr, close to Bollinger road), I strongly oppose the idea of converting the current double traffic lanes into the proposed single-lane, for the following reasons: 1. The existing Bollinger design considered the heavy traffic needs of the nearby residents and city citizens. There are only a few main east-west traffic corridors in this region, including Homestead, Stevens Creek, Bollinger and Prospect, all of which are at least double traffic lanes with heavy commute needs. Changing Bollinger into single lane will cause sever congestion which will adversely affect Cupertino residents and nearby neighborhoods (W. San Jose area, Santa Clara, for example). 2. The existing Bollinger design already factored in the needs of cyclists with dedicated bicycle lane. There is no need to extend the bicycle lane to try to increase cycling usage. I use Bollinger Road to commute to work place everyday. There are very few cyclists on this road throughout the year. Please do take a few field trips to observe this yourself. 3. During rush hours of the week (even in afternoon hours of weekends), I noticed heavy traffic on the road already, from commuters to work to parents sending/picking up kids to and from schools. It is certainly a good idea to promote ‘Green commute’ in our city, but please do so without sacrificing resident’s life quality by introducing lots of inconvenience. In my opinion, it is also irresponsible to simply consider cyclists’ single-sided opinions without doing an in-field investigation. If you think this could be a highly controversial topic with heavy impact to our city and neighborhood, please do allow more time to hold hearings in the city, collecting more polling letters to get extensive feedback, before making the hasty decision. Thank you! Tao Shui (408)6219416 From:Tim Liang To:City Council Subject:Subject: Concerns about Converting Bollinger Road to a One-Way Street Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 6:47:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Officials and Stakeholders, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed conversion of Bollinger Road to a one-way street. As a daily commuter on Bollinger Road, I am well aware of the traffic congestion during rush hour. However, I believe that converting the road to a one-way street would not only fail to solve the problem but would also exacerbate it. Bollinger Road serves as a critical thoroughfare for many residents who commute to Lawrence Expy. Reducing the road to a single lane would effectively halve its capacity, leading to increased congestion and longer commute times. Furthermore, I question whether the city has conducted any studies to assess the impact of converting Bollinger Road to a one-way street. Is there any data to support the claim that this change would actually improve traffic flow? In addition, the city's financial situation is already strained. It is unwise to allocate scarce resources to a project like this one, which would be a waste of taxpayer money and inconvenience residents. I have never heard of a case where a city intentionally narrowed a major roadway. Such a move goes against the very notion of urban development and progress. If the city truly wants to promote economic growth and prosperity, it should focus on the following measures: Attracting businesses and investments by creating a favorable business environment Controlling housing costs to attract and retain talented professionals Opening up school districts to attract young families These are the types of initiatives that would foster sustainable growth and development for our city, rather than self-defeating measures like converting Bollinger Road to a one-way street, which would only alienate residents and hinder progress. I urge the city to carefully reconsider this proposal and make a decision that is in the best interests of all residents. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Tim 03/18/2024 From:Tony G. Li To:City Council Subject:Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:46:26 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi there, I know the city council will discuss the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor tonight. My home is close to the Bollinger Road and my kids are in the Hyde Middle School. The Bollinger Road is already very congested in the morning every day. It takes me a lot of time to bring them to school. I don’t think city council should spend money on the bike land along the Bollinger Road. I hope you guys can delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor. And please put my comments into the public record! Thanks and best regards! Tony Li From:Tracy Kosolcharoen To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Public comment agenda item 1 Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:09:37 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council & Staff, Please deprioritize the Bollinger Road corridor design project from the CIP work list. Bollinger is a key artery going to multiple schools (Lynbrook, Eaton, Miller, Hyde to name a few), the Cupertino Library, City Hall, a retail complex with multiple restaurants, parks, and more. Forcing 4-lane traffic into 2 lanes will exacerbate congestion in a key thoroughfare. Moreover, there are potential housing developments planned along S De Anza that will further increase the population of this area. Why would we constrict roads when they have high usage and are likely to have even higher usage in the future? Finally, the City continually expresses that it is in a budget deficit and must reduce city services. The Bollinger project has already been classified as "Low" priority, but it was elevated due to grant funding. However, this reprioritization does not take into account the fact that the grant funding only covers the first, very small portion of the project (traffic analysis/feasibility/design). The second portion is the more substantial cost: $4M funding over 5 years. Per the document, there is no grant funding for the construction portion. If we cannot even afford to maintain pavement quality, how can we afford $4M for this project? Many thanks, Tracy From:Will Shearin To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:44:25 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. I live north of Bollinger off of Miller and use Bollinger on a regular basis. Much like Miller, Bollinger is a through street where drivers go very quickly which makes crossing the street, entering the flow of traffic, or riding a bike fairly risky. In the case of Bollinger, there have been fatalities and apparently many near-misses. For an 80% discount with the grant money, it seems like it would be a good idea to take a look at how to improve safety, particularly at that curve just east of Blaney, that’s a scary little stretch of road. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Will Shearin AppleCare CC Analysis wshearin@apple.com From:WJ Cheng To:City Council Subject:Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 10:30:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I know you guys don't care but for people who live around Bollinger and commute to work/school daily on Bollinger, making it one lane each direction will dramatically increase traffic congestion. It won't ease it, it will only create more congestion. Moorpark was converted to one lane with a bike lane and what has happened since? More traffic and hardly any bikers using the lanes. You guys don't care bout the residents and only care about your political careers!! Stop the funding of Bollinger road corridor design now. Come down to Bollinger around 7-8am on a weekday and see for yourselves! Put my comments into the public record! From:Xgll Zong To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:26:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi officer, Good afternoon! I'm a resident of Cupertino, and two of my kids go to John Muir Elementary school. I drive through Bollinger Rd everyday. The traffic is quite heavy already in today's condition, converting to single lane would severely deteriorate the traffic and cause big congestion for our neighborhood's residents and sister cities commuters. Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please put my comments into the public record. Thank you! Best, Danya From:Xgll Zong To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:26:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi officer, Good afternoon! I'm a resident of Cupertino, and two of my kids go to John Muir Elementary school. I drive through Bollinger Rd everyday. The traffic is quite heavy already in today's condition, converting to single lane would severely deteriorate the traffic and cause big congestion for our neighborhood's residents and sister cities commuters. Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please put my comments into the public record. Thank you! Best, Danya From:Xgll Zong To:City Council; City Clerk Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:12:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi officer, I'm the resident of Cuoertino, and two of my kids go to John muir Elementary school. I drive through Bollinger Rd everyday. The traffic is quite heavy already in nowadays condition, converting to single lane would severely deteriorate the traffic and cause big congestion for our neighborhoods residents and sister cities commuters. Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please put my comments into the public record. Best, Danya From:Xia Zhao To:City Clerk Subject:Oppose Bollinger Rd. Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:53:32 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino city clerks I live near Bollinger/Johnson Ave. Every day I drive on Bollinger to go somewhere. I think Bollinger Rd is a very busy road, 2 lanes both ways is absolute necessary. So please don’t start the Bollinger rd corridor design! And please put my email into public records. Thanks From:Xiangchen Xu To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Regarding the CIP Study session in today"s special meeting Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:13:28 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Honorable councilmembers, I just want to share my concern regarding the CIP project #1 in today's study session. According to the staff report, the priority of Bollinger Road Corridor Design is Low. However, the total cost is high ($4,000,000 or more in future). Do you believe it is appropriate to start a low priority project right away while our city is facing financial difficulty. We are sorry to see many city funded programs stopped because of the revenue decline. What's more, we already have several other big CIP projects on-going. I hope you can consider to postpone funding this project in today's city council meeting. Please include my comments in public record. Thanks a lot! Sincerely yours, Xiangchen From:Xiangying Yang To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Concern on Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:00:15 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear city council members, cc city clerk, As a Cupertino resident/voter, I am writing to respectfully request you to delay the funding decision on the Bollinger Road project. Please put my comments into the public record. I have the following concerns. - The idea was brought up long time ago and there has been no sufficient public hearing and thorough study on how it would impact many people's life - Due to a recent change, Cupertino is running into budget issue and has to cut many public services. Why this project is so urgent and high priority? I am a biker on that road too for the past 10 years, although I did not ride every day. I probably meet <2 other bikers every time on that route. - The road is crucial for many families' (Cupertino, WSJ and even Campbell and Santa Clara) commute, did you have a calculation on the # of passengers in cars/bus vs # of bikers on that road? - As a biker I think there are other more reasonable and preferred approaches such as providing more biking/pedestrian friendly crossing signals, or find other smaller less-busy roads to implement bike/pedestrian mixed use zone. Thank you for considering my comments Best regards, Xiangying Yang From:Xin Wang To:City Council Subject:Delay Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:29:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Cupertino City Council, I'm writing the email to urge you to delay the fund allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. There are many schools around Bollinger road and it's already very congested during rush hours. Reducing the current 4 lanes to 2 lanes will definitely make traffic worse. As a resident in Cupertino/West San Jose area for 5 years and traveling on Bollinger daily multiple times a day, I do not witness many biker using this road. In my opinion, adding a bike lane on each side doesn't made sense. Not to mention project like this will add burden to city budgets already under stress. Please put my comments into the public record. Regards, Xin Wang From:Xinhai Ye To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:Bollinger project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:46:31 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, Why waste money on this project? If the road is converted to two lanes, I can see it will introduce traffic jams. If the city has to spend some money on it, Alternative B is much better than Alternative A. -thanks Stanley From:Y Thorstenson To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:49:34 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. Yvonne From:Yang Liu To:City Clerk Subject:Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:24:28 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi dear Council Staff, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the lane conversion proposal on Bollinger Road. Having resided in the vicinity of Bollinger Road, specifically at Miller Avenue, for numerous years, and commuting on Bollinger Road daily, I consider myself intimately acquainted with the current state of the road. It serves as a primary route for residents in our neighborhood, and traffic congestion is already a significant issue during peak hours. Implementing this proposal will exacerbate the problem, potentially leading to a standstill in traffic flow. Many individuals within our community share these apprehensions. I urge you to postpone the allocation of funds for this project and to gather more input from the community before proceeding further. Please ensure that my comments are included in the public record. Thank you, Yang From:Yang Liu To:City Council Subject:Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 11:17:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi dear Council Staff, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the lane conversion proposal on Bollinger Road. Having resided in the vicinity of Bollinger Road, specifically at Miller Avenue, for numerous years, and commuting on Bollinger Road daily, I consider myself intimately acquainted with the current state of the road. It serves as a primary route for residents in our neighborhood, and traffic congestion is already a significant issue during peak hours. Implementing this proposal will exacerbate the problem, potentially leading to a standstill in traffic flow. Many individuals within our community share these apprehensions. I urge you to postpone the allocation of funds for this project and to gather more input from the community before proceeding further. Please ensure that my comments are included in the public record. Thank you, Yang From:Yang, Shenglin To:City Council Subject:Opposed to the idea of changing of traffic lane change on Bollinger Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:02:13 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear city council, I am a resident living around Bollinger and Miller area. It is a shock to hear that the city is discussing to change the traffic lane on Bollinger road between De Anza & Lawrence to single-lane. This is a terrible proposal. I commute on this route every single day. The current traffic in this area is already pretty bad during rush hour. The back up is really bad even with the current 2-lane condition. Can not image the traffic congestion with this change. Very doubt that the person made this unthoughtful proposal has any real experience. Always heard city is tight on finance and there are so many thing city can do to benefit the residents. Why spend money on this atrocious idea. We strongly opposed to the idea to this traffic lane change. Please consider our residents’ request/input before making any decisions. Thanks, Shenglin From:Yanghong Zhong To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:Re: 3-19-2024 City Council Agenda Item #1 CIP - Bollinger Project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:32:44 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. hi city council Please Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design and wait for more residential comment. single lanes could make the daily commute very difficult, my kids late for school twice, because city road maintenance last year, if bollinger change to single lane, then many kids will fail. also this is important daily commute road, distribute traffic from steven creek blvd , make cupertino engineers save lots time on commute. Please put my comments into the public record. have a great day Byron On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 2:40 PM Yanghong Zhong <tolieve@gmail.com> wrote: hi city council The Bollinger Road is a major commuting road with double lanes on both sides I I live in that aera, bollinger is everyday commute and school road for me.. I see the proposal is Alternative A: Lane ConversionBollinger Road would be reduced from 4 lanes to 2 lanes (l lane in each direction), creatingspace for a continuous two-way left-furn lane or median, improved pedestrian crossings, andimproved bicycle facility. Alternative B: Maintain Existing Lanes Bollinger Road would maintain the existing 4 lanes. I recommend you re-consider PLAN A, I would prefer PLAN B single lanes could make the daily commute very difficult, my kids late for school twice, because city road maintenance last year, if bollinger change to single lane, then many kids will fail. also this is important daily commute road, distribute traffic from steven creek blvd , make cupertino engineers save lots time on commute. -- Byron Zhong Enjoy Your EveryDays -- Byron Zhong Enjoy Your EveryDays From:Yanghong Zhong To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:3-19-2024 City Council Agenda Item #1 CIP - Bollinger Project Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:40:45 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. hi city council The Bollinger Road is a major commuting road with double lanes on both sides I I live in that aera, bollinger is everyday commute and school road for me.. I see the proposal is Alternative A: Lane ConversionBollinger Road would be reduced from 4 lanes to 2 lanes (l lane in each direction), creatingspace for a continuous two-way left-furn lane or median, improved pedestrian crossings, andimproved bicycle facility. Alternative B: Maintain Existing Lanes Bollinger Road would maintain the existing 4 lanes. I recommend you re-consider PLAN A, I would prefer PLAN B single lanes could make the daily commute very difficult, my kids late for school twice, because city road maintenance last year, if bollinger change to single lane, then many kids will fail. also this is important daily commute road, distribute traffic from steven creek blvd , make cupertino engineers save lots time on commute. -- Byron Zhong Enjoy Your EveryDays From:Yao Xia To:City Council Subject:Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:36:24 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Bollinger road is very busy during traffic hours! It's not a good idea to change bollinger road to a single lane road. People will get stuck in the traffic! Please put my comments into the public record. Thank you! Yao From:Ying LIU To:City Clerk Subject:About changing bollinger road to single lane Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:24:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please put my comments into the public record. It is wast of money. Can not believe whoese ideal is it? What a terrible impact this will have on residents and all others. Yours, Ying From:Ying LIU To:City Council Subject:Change bollinger road to single lane Date:Monday, March 18, 2024 9:34:49 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, Please Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design. Please put my comments into the public record. It is wast of money. Can not believe whoese ideal is it? Yours, Ying From:Yingfeng Su To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Re: Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:57:29 AM Attachments:image.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Just to add, I live at Bollinger & Miller intersection. The map below is my bike path (actually it was my actual commute to work today, 3/19 Tuesday). Due to the river, I don’t really have a safe alternative path for this section without significantly lengthening my route. — Yingfeng Su > On Mar 19, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Yingfeng Su <samsonsu@gmail.com> wrote: > > Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, > I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. > > I’m a bike commuter who uses Bollinger every day and it doesn’t feel safe especially at those curves around the river and Blaney. Cars cut corners and speed thru them, and there is zero protection for bike lane. I would like to see a study, and eventually some improvements done to improve the bike safety on that road. Even a small section of barriers that seperate bike lane from car lanes help a lot. I know car drivers don’t like it, but there should be a balance to keep both groups of users happy — I myself both drive and bike. > > The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. > > Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. > > The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. > > Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. From:Yingfeng Su To:City Council Cc:Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject:Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:48:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. I’m a bike commuter who uses Bollinger every day and it doesn’t feel safe especially at those curves around the river and Blaney. Cars cut corners and speed thru them, and there is zero protection for bike lane. I would like to see a study, and eventually some improvements done to improve the bike safety on that road. Even a small section of barriers that seperate bike lane from car lanes help a lot. I know car drivers don’t like it, but there should be a balance to keep both groups of users happy — I myself both drive and bike. The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars. Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. From:Yuhong Sheng To:City Clerk; City Council Subject:postpone the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:10:47 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello there, My name is Yuhong Sheng and I have been living in Cupertino as a citizen for more than 15 years. I am so shocked to become aware of the proposed plan to reduce Bolliger Road to one lane in each direction, and I am writing to express my strong opposition to this idea. Bolliger Road is a vital thoroughfare in our community, particularly given its proximity to several schools. Implementing this change would undoubtedly exacerbate traffic congestion, leading to increased stress levels and a higher likelihood of accidents. Furthermore, such a modification poses significant risks to both motorists and cyclists alike. I urge you to reconsider this plan and halt any further progress on it. Preserving the current configuration of Bolliger Road is crucial for maintaining safety and efficiency in our neighborhood. Please put my comments into the public record. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Yuhong