Loading...
89,314 93-02 Brice/James _ 89,314 ANNEXATION 93-02 _ 21761 Olive Avenue Brice/James now � M i CITY OF CUPERTINO • • • RECEIPT • No. ? 5953 • DATE S/i 191.Z• RECEIVED /J • FROM 1A t C,�� C A !`'!''�R7 • r ADDRESS CISN CNECN MD Ev • X OPMM DOLLARS CEN15 • v 0 • s • By CEIVED 3 ?5 10 0 i . tlpWN WbNFSS 5M51FMS.111151 M1'P15 . • 89,3/q- • f RESOLUTION NO. 9003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "OLIVE AVENUE 93-0211, APPROXIMATELY 0.15 ACRE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF OLIVE AVENUE BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND PASADENA AVENUE; BRICE (APN 357-18-028) WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.15 acre on the north side of Olive Avenue (APN 357-18-028) has been filed by property owners James and JoAnn Brice; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 1993, the City Council adopted resolution No. 8988 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Olive Avenue 93-02; and WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the proposal consent to this annexation; and WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting authority for said annexation; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: Resolution No. 9003 1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the Government Code for the annexation of property designated "Olive Avenue 93-02", more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; 2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino: a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.15 acre. b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy of annexing when providing City services. C. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment, and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration. d. The City Council on June 4, 1984, enacted an ordinance prezoning the subject territory to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 zone. C. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special districts. f. That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission. g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions. h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this determination. i. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. j. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of ownership. k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan. 2 Resolution No. 9003 I. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area. M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under provisions of the Government Code. 3. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 35151 et seq. of the Government Code. 4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give notice of said annexation as prescribed by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of January, 1994 by the following vote: Vote Member Qf tk CitX Council AYES: Bautista, Burnett, Dean, Sorense, Koppel NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Kim M.Smith (s/ Barbara Koppel City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 3 nEXHHU,l, Am ANNExATION To THE CITY OF GVPERPINO "Olive Ave. 93-02" oll that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, state f California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 2 as shown on "Record of Survey for W. Garcia", which map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of Santa Clara County in Book 136 of Maps, at page 8: Thence from said Point of Beginning S8905613011E, 66.67 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 2; Thence SOUTH, 97.70 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 2; Thence, N89056130"W, 66.67 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 2 and along the northerly berry line of Olive Avenue and that certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Almaden Avenue 80-13"; Thence NORTH, 97.70 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 0.15 acres, more or less A.P.N. : 357-18-028 Date: SePtember 23, 1993 Revision date: October 11, 1993 Q Z W 4 a ALMADEN AVE I a0 a OLIVE AVE. TR 1 6-M-a LOT 2 ® SITE W J APN 357-18-028 SAN FERNANDO a 6,513.66 SQ. FT. z AVE. z S89'56'30"E / 0.15 ACRES m z O I �67' r _ _ ALCAZAR 0 AVE. �J I P.O.B. I � D I D z z cD co N I CIO DOLORES AvE. SCALE: 1"=60' m I LOT 1 A -J LOT 2/`i o LOT 3 I o o = m VICINITY MAP Z NOT TO SCALE D I 30' < m I 66.67' - - - D C 20' �N89'S6'30"W < m m _ _ - - - -OLIVE-AVL -U.E ___- m EXISTING ANNEXATION "ALMADEN 80-13" 30' • RES. 5462 I LEGEND: EXHIBIT B = BOUNDARY' LINE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION k PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO i — — — = BOUNDARY LINE OF ENTITLED OLIVE AVE. 93-02 EXISTING ANNEXATION ' DATE: SEPT. 1993 SCALE: 1 " L= 60' - - - - - - = EXISTING CITY LIMITS BY: K. RIEDEN REVISED: 10- 3CITY OF CUPERTIN City Hall Ocitvof 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408)777-3354 FAX: (408)777-3333 Ct pertll10 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT May 15, 1995 File: 89,314 County of Santa Clara Local Agency Formation Commission County Government Center, East Wing 70 West Hedding Street, 1 Oth Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Dear Sir: In response to a Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census letter dated April 28, 1995, the following information is submitted for your review: Resolution No. 9003 -Annexation of Territory Designated "Olive Avenue 93-02" and attachments (Exhibit"A",Exhibit"B") Resolution No. 8957 is shown on the enclosed Census Bureau form. This resolution approved a quit claim deed on the same property but was inadvertently shown as the resolution number for annexation. Our records have been corrected. Very truly yours, City of Cupertino Carmen Lynauu Public Works Project Manager nUnl enclosures cc: Dept. of Commerce, Census Bureau California State Board of Equalization Pnnted on Recycled Paper PS�ENT OCCOM� BAS-13(U-CA W "9� UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (2-95) Bureau of the Census Washington, DC 20233-0001 APR 2 6 1995 s cp 1 Ob 0670 MIL MAYOR CUPERTINO CITY 10300 TORRE AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014 Dear Public Official: Thank you for your response to our annual Boundary and Annexation Survey. We submit the information you provide to the Certifying Official for the State of California (noted in the box below), who certifies whether the reported actions were accomplished in accordance with California law. This procedure ensures the accuracy of the information we use for reporting data we collect in our decennial and economic censuses as well as our current surveys. It also ensures that your records are complete for the survey year. Certifying Official Mr.Burton W.Oliver Executive Director California State Board of Equalization 1020 N Street,Room 118 Sacramento,CA 95814 Contact person Telephone number The Certifying Official recently notified us that the State is unable to certify one or more boundary change actions that you reported to us. Please review the information listed on the reverse side of this letter. For all actions you believe to be legally in effect, please send a copy of the relevant authorization (ordinance, resolution, and so on) and a plat showing the area involved to the appropriate Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). The LAFCO will notify the Certifying Official of each action that the State should certify to us. If you sent a copy of the effecting authorization to your LAFCO earlier, please notify the LAFCO that the Certifying Official has not received the correspondence. Should your review show either that the State's records are in error or that you need to modify information previously reported to the Census Bureau regarding boundary change actions, please notify both the Certifying Official and the Census Bureau accordingly. It is important that you notify your Certifying Official of your findings and the actions being taken as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding our request, please call Ms. Louise Stewart of my staff on (301) 457-1099. Thank you for your cooperation with the surveys of the Bureau of the Census. Sincerely, JOEL L. MORRISON Chief, Geography Division Bureau of the Census • BOUNDARY CHANGES THAT THE STATE WAS UNABLE TO CERTIFY Authorization Action (b) Effective date (a) Type Number (c) Annexation Resolution 8957 09-07-93 FORM BAB-13(L)-CA 12-10-951 0 Countyof Santa Clara cOCtn Tt Department of Planning and Development Office of the County Surveyor County Government Center. East Wing — ZF 70 West I ledding Street 'S San)use. California 951 10 �y �Vi* (408)299-2871 PUBLIC WORKS October 27, 1993 Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk City of Cupertino P. O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 The attached revised map and description dated October 11, 1993 of territory proposed for annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled OLIVE AVENUE 93-02 is in accordance with Government Code Section 56826. The boundaries of said territory are definite and certain. The proposal is in compliance with the Local Agency Formation Commission's road annexation policies. /6J 17XIuct� Martin D. Marcott County Surveyor Attachment cc: LAFCO Executive Officer (w/attachment) KeVr, Rl'ec{en Board of Supervisors: Michael M. 1 tonda. Zoe 1_olgren. Hon 0 ozales. Hod Diridon, Dianne McKenna County Executive: Salle H. Heed "FXHM37T A" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERUNO "Olive Ave. 93-02" All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 2 as shown on "Record of Survey for W. Garcia", which map was filed for reoord in the Office of the Recorder of Santa Clara County in Book 136 of Maps, at page 8: Thence from said Point of Beginning S8905613011E, 66.67 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 2; Thence SOUTH, 97.70 feat to the southeast corner of said Lot 2; Thence, N89056130"W, 66.67 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 2 and along the northerly boundary line of Olive Avenue and that certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Almaden Avenue 80-13"; Thence NORTH, 97.70 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 0.15 acres, more or less A.P.N. : 357-18-028 Date: September 23, 1993 Revision date: October 11, 1993 kQ 2 W O uj A MADEN AVEa a < 4 OLIVE AVE. GSM LOT 2 a Q. SITE w � a 136 APN 357-18-028 SAN FERN AND 2 6,513.66 SO. FT. W AVE. - S89'56'30"E 0.15 ACRES m O 66.67' ( ALCAZAR 0 AVE. T P.O.B. I D D / D DOLORES AVE. CZO �� O Q SCALE: 1"=60' m i LOT 1 = o LOT 2 a = LOT 3 i m VICINITY MAP Z NOT TO SCALE < 30' D m 66.67' D fC C m _ Z OLIVE_AVFNU.E _ m EXISTING ANNEXATION "ALMADEN 80-13" 30' RES. 5462 LEGEND: EXHIBIT B = BOUNDARY' LINE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO — — = BOUNDARY LINE OF ENTITLED OLIVE AVE. 93-02 EXISTING ANNEXATION DATE: SEPT. 1993 SCALE: 1" = 60' - - - - - - = EXISTING CITY LIMITS BY: K. RIEDEN REVISED: 10-11 -93 CITY OF CUPERTINO "F.1HIBTT An "Olive Ave. 93-02" All that certain real property situate in the county of Santa Clara, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 2 as shown on "Record of Survey for W. Garcia", which map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of Santa Clara County in Book 136 of Maps, at page 8: Thence from said Point of Beginning S8905613011E, 66.67 feet to the northeast corner of said Trot 2; Thence SOUTH, 97.70 feet to the southeast corner of said lot 2; Thence N8905613011W, 66.67 feet along the northerly boundary line of Olive Avenue and that certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Almaden Avenue 80-13"; Thence NORTH, 97.70 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 0.15 acres, more or less A.P.N. : 357-18-028 117 1 gq. .;/.l Q 2 W l � J 4 Li A MADEN AVEa OLIVE AVE. Q f T t < a SITE 36 LOT 2 SAN FERNANDO W s APN 357-18-028 z AVE. c� 6,513.66 SQ. FT. S89'S6'30"E m ALCAZAR AVE. O H667 m � P.O.B. y D Cn DOLORES AVE. Z z D SCALE: 1"=60' m LOT 1 oLOT 3 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE m D Z - - - < c m m �� OLIVE AVENUE m EXISTING ANNEXATION "ALMADEN 80-13" • RES. 5462 LEGEND: EXHIBIT B BOUNDARY LINE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ENTITLED OLIVE AVE. 93-02 BOUNDARY LINE OF EXISTING ANNEXATION DATE: SEPT. 1993 SCALE: 1" = 60' BY: K. RIEDEN REVISED: CITY OF CUPERTINO RECORDING REQUESTED • GATEWAY TITLE COMPANY WE. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND, UNLESS OTHER- WISE SHOWN BELOW,MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN DEED OF TRUST IS A FULL, TRUE AND CORRECT F COPY OF THE ORIGINAL, RECORDED NAME James A. Brice, Jr. and / 3 UNDER ADDRESS Jo Ann Brice cITY A 21761 Olive Avenue RE ORDER'S FILE t_ 7L g.S(o L6 STATE Cupertino, CA 95014 GATEWAY TITLE COMPANY ZIP ZIP 721 BV Title Order No. 736-7360064C-scrow No. 7360064 APN: 357-18-028 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED The undersigned declares that the documentary transfer tax is $ .. 313.50 .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . ..... . .. ... ... and is ® computed on the full value of the interest or property conveyed, or is — ❑ computed on the full value less the value of liens or encumbrances remaining thereon at the time of sale. The land, tenements or realty is located in ® unincorporated area ❑ city of . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... .. ..... ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CAL PENINSULA EXCHANGE, INC. , a California corporation hereby GRANT(S) to JAMES A. BRICE, JR. and JO ANN BRICE, husband and wife, as Joint Tenants the following described real property in the Unincorporated Area county of Santa Clara state of California: Lot 2, as shown on that certain record of survey which was filed for record in the ENO office of the recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, on August 2 4, 1961 in Book 136of Maps, at page 8. L� L/) Property is commonly known as: 21761 Olive Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (l Dated_ June 14, 1993 Cal P ins a Inc. b Arthur A. Mar ue , Vi side Secreta STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF .Santa Clara } S.S. On June 15 , 1993 before me, H. Patrica Brutlmlett personally w, appeared _ Arthur A. Marquez -_ FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP 7 'rl 4704 JAMES A. BRICE, JR. 11-24 JO ANN BRICE 121NG (406)248.9044 83 CRONIN DR. 4 199 SANTA CLARA,CA 95051 PAY TO /� F C $ �C�•DQ t� Txc awes of o0 DOLLARS =. EL CAMMO-REMINGTON OFFICE WELLS FARGO BANK ' 599 EAST EL CAMNO REAL SLWNYVALE.CA WI87 - MEMO �: l 2 L000 2481: ?04 0469 249 ? WIRO I' JAMES A. BRICE, JR. 4705 'T"v iw.o T JO ANN BRICE 11 (408)248-9044 121 1f1 83 CRONIN DR. SANTA CLARA,CA 95051 I9 PAY TO (�^+' \�^ ,Ne o.oe.oFa gym. l Y o r JA�T� CLo,Lyr S !3�OSI o>7 OU— �DoLLAxs - EL CAMINO-REMINGTON OFFICE - WELIS FARGO BANK d. 590 EAST EL CAMINO REAL SONNYV .CA 94a91 MEMO �: 1 2 1000 24 11: ?05 0469 2497181I' 1 City of Cupertino (408)252-4505 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA- 95014 PETITION for proceedings pursuant to the CORTESE-KNOX KCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985 The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of Cupertino for approval of a proposed change of organization or reorganization, and stipulate(s) as follows: 1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985) . 2. The proposed change of organization is designated as: "Olive Ave. 93-02" and consists of: X annexation to City of Cupertino _ detachment from (name City/District) of . 15 (number of) acres on the N (n/s/e/w) side of Olive Avenue (Street/Avenue) between Orange Avenue (Street/Avenue) and Pasadena Avenue (Street/Avenue) and (if applicable) _ annexation detachment of the same to/from (name City/District(s) ) 3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the territory(ies) included in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map of said territory(ies) , marked Exhibit B, are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein. 4. The territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited. ("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited. 5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence is not of the affected city and district(s) . 6. The reasons(s) for the proposed ANNEXATION (annexation, detachment, reorganization, etc.) is/are: To procure City services. Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2- 7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to the following terms and conditions: 8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one) : owner(s) of land within the affected territory. registered voter(s) within the affected territory. 9. The undersigned proponent(s) do own 100% of the territory do not proposed for change of organization or reorganization. Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows: C[IIEF PETITIONERS (not to exceed three) Signatures of Petitioners (please print) Assessor's Election name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct Date si ture City/S ate/Zip No.* No.** Z17fol "we Avenve 551-16-oZ8 sr Cvper+"nv Phone: M&) 2jt-9244 21-7(01 oL1vr Ayehve Cupe r+ no Phone: Phone (_) * - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner-initiated proposals. ** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter initiated proposals. City of Cupertino (408)252-4505 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with any petition to the City for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorganization (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.) PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: "Olive Ave 93-02" Annexation ) Detachment ) to/from City of Cupertino Reorganization) (City or Spec. District) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL X -City of Cupertino , as Lead Agency for environmental review (Name of City/District) of the project, has already prezoned (prezoned? other approval action?) the territory on June 4, 1984 , and in ccnpliance with CEQA, has: (date) _ determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal.Arbm.Code Sec. (cite class exemption section) . completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. copleted a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. _ City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the project and the completed Environmental Information Form required by Planning staff is attached to this application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 252-4505.) Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec. because CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA 1. Number of acres . 15 2. Number of inhabitants 4 3. Number of registered voters 4 4. Number of dwelling units 1 5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) : Single Family Residential b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract under provisions of the Williamson Act: C. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above parcel(s) from the contract? 6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing requirement for city annexations) : R1-7.5 b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is annexed to the City? YES_ NO X If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought. 7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being proposed for the territory, if any, and when this development is expected to begin. Remodel single family residence as soon as possible S. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership? YES X NC If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide justification for approving the boundary change as proposed: Suppl. Appl. -2- 9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES NO x If YES, answer the following questions: a. Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? (If more than one island is being created, indicate the acreage of each island.) b. Number of inhabitants? C. Assessed value? d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip? e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island: f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an island? YES NO If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified. SERVICES 10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in the City or District's urban service area: YES-1- NO 11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES_ NOx If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal? 12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc- tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be fin- anced by the formation of a special assessment district? YES_ NOS If YES, describe service(s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner of the district. Service/improvement: Cost: $ fyr. for _ yrs. $ Jyr. for _ yrs. Supp• Appl. -3- 13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal. (Exclude -Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importation.) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information) : k(�, }'no ElerreniarYSc.l.ocl D s+r c} c S[Anli Dis ICt =ln, + H qh 5choc.l Oe+r�ct M d n' �sula0 _ DeFY t Fw+hi Korn wnityColuf)epistrist LANDOWNERS AND RBGISTERE'D VOTERS 14. Please provide the information requested below: a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexatoin/detaclmrent/reor- ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by property-owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or print names, addresses, etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed lard (not improvements) valuation, and, if 100% property-owner consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be added prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained. Assessed Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of Date Print name below City/State/Zip Tel. No. No. Lard . oel74/ o[tt*.M P--GAB' # 1D8,242 u RTi✓O �� r d/7GI oGl✓Ftd� o?4P-4o9� T J N /Ct eul��2n�+o (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.) * "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency owning land." Government Code Section 56048. Supp. Appl. -4- CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal) I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property locates within the annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by application and that the _ (number) signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER C EraIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City will make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing. Date: City Clerk (Seal) City of Cupertino b. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor- ganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number arxi assessed land valuation below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be held for less-than-100%-consent applications. Street Address Street Address Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.) C. FOR NOT-100% OONSETr pROposALS, list all registered voters residing in the territory proposed for anneomtion/detachment/re- organization if different from the landowners shown in 14a. and 14b. above. Street Address Street Address Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet grid attach. ) supp• Appl. -5- 15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Director of Community_ Development's Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district) Street Address Name City/State/Zip (1) (2) (3) 16. I hereby certify that all ZAFCO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate. Bert J Viskovich 10300 Torre Avenue (PrF.re,ift7L, complete- Cupertino CA 95014 ing ( /n( s si ) NUI�: It is a general IAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this appli tion be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to submit this information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met.