89,310 11845 Upland Way 92-04 Harlan/Ruth Sethe t
89,310 11845 Upland Way 92-04 —
Harlan/Ruth Sethe
Annexation
F�
am
v CITY OF CUPERTINO • •
• RECIIPT •
No. 67443
DATE 19 "1RECEIVE
C
• FROM D Ht)(IAV,% Se4hc: •
ADDRESS f-) U61G nd
USM CXECK XCNEx
• OMEN DOLLARS CENTS •
• Fee 3 - •
. f10 -4 - 0 •
• k4 14= •
• RRECEIVED �'fi_ •
. CRJWry&1511f555v51FN5-��.151 M1.AJ5 .
t CITY OF CUPERTINO .
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 1 Date
To /, Dow-eAbi Corne iys From t`�ewin Rieden
C 14 Clerk P bl work I
El Information MESSAGE: Pie-ase p rrYocess for anneXa4',nll . Enc�nse 7
❑ Implement Are Pla-�ny-J 1 ,cr r i QLKiNo
❑ Investigate Z pe+i+l f1Y1 �l IDDI IfGiT On
❑ Discuss
❑ See me 3 VIP la ra4i On
❑ Reply 4 l n't-+I G1 I S+ud y
_ 5 � r
G� C1neck S G), Co,)YA U otn� LAD
Reply:
SIGNED: DATE
Forward part 1 Retain part 2
v �
0
EXHIBIT A
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ENTITLED "UPLAND HAY 92-04"
DATE: MARCH 1992
Consisting of Parcel B as shown on that certain parcel map recorded in Book 492 of Naps
at page 2, Santa Clara County records and described as follows:
Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Parcel a , said corner lying on the
Westerly boundary of Upland Hay, sixty feet wide: thence along said Westerly boundary of
Upland Way through a curve to the left with an initial tangent of S33041'00"E, a radius
of 205.00 feet, an internal angle of 18001'00" , and a length of 64.46 feet to an iron
pipe at a point of compound curvature; thence along a curve to the left with a radius of
40.00 feet, an internal angle of 120000' 00", and a length of 83 .78 feet to a point of
cusp at the most Northeasterly corner of said Parcel B; thence along the Northeasterly
boundary of said Parcel B S51042'00"E 283.10 feet to the Easterly boundary of said Parcel
B; thence along said Easterly boundary S17044'00"W 98.25 feet to the Southerly boundary
of said Parcel B; thence along said Southerly boundary S89057 '00"W 489.89 feet to an iron
pipe at the most Southwesterly corner of said Parcel B; thence along the Westerly line of
said Parcel B N27014' 11"E 321.99 feet to an iron pipe; thence N83042' 00"E 42.57 feet to
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 99,230 square feet (2.278 acres) more or less and lying within Santa Clara
County, California.
QROF ESSIp'V,
APN: 366-03-051
Cz Z
597
No. 20
� m
Xp 9�
��91 CIVIL ���• ��
F OF CAL_F� -
r �
EXHIBIT " B"
EXISTING ANNEXATION
UPLAND WAY 90-01
RES. #8237
o = 18'01'00" 4
N 83'42'00" E R = 205.00'
42.57 L = 64.46'
o = 120'00'00"
R = 40.00'
EXISTING ANNEXATION g L = 83.78'
"UPLAND WAY 89-12"
RES. #8126
R
�00' SCALE: 1"=100'
n/ F
/PARCEL B 2e�
,PARCEL MAP '°'
492 OF MAPS, PAGE 2
ry� 2.278 ± ACRES/ t41
2/ ry O
obi .n
N 89'57'00" E 489.89' 2
o QKOFc SSIIJ.I
LEGEND: h�r`��V'j
BOUNDARY LINE OF cz
PROPOSED ANNEXATION No. 20597 lal
BOUNDARY LINE OF
EXISTING ANNEXTATION rfgT C1VIl
PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE
�ANo o CITY OF CUPERTINO
�'E MCN m x ENTITLED
DRIVE m " UPLAND WAY 9 2 - 04"
pW RAINBOW DR ( S ET H E)
y�Py
BOWS 3 APN 366 - 03 - 051
m UPLAND
SITE MARCH, 1992
VICINITY MAP
City of Cupertino (408)252-4505
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL G0vERNKwr REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of
Cupertino for approval of a proposed change of organization or
reorganization, and stipulate(s) as follows:
1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the
California Government Code (conmiencing with Section 56000,
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985) .
2. The proposed charge of organization is designated as:
Upland Way 92-04
and consists of:
X annexation to The City of Cupertino
- _ detachment from (name City/District)
of 2.278 (number of) acres on the end (n/s/e/w)
side of Upland Way (Street/Avenue)
between Rainbow Drive (Street/Avenue)
and Bubb Road (Street/Avenue)
and (if applicable) _ annexation
detachment
of the same to/from
(name City/District(s) )
3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory(ies) included in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map
of said territory(ies) , marked Exhibit B. are attached to this
petition and by this reference incorporated herein.
4. The territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited.
("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited.
5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence
is not of the affected city and district(s) .
6. The reasons(s) for the proposed annexation (annexation,
detachment, reorganization, etc.) is/are:
To procure City services
Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2-
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or
reorganization be made subject to the following terms and conditions:
8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one) :
owner(s) of land within the affected territory.
_ registered voter(s) within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) do own 100% of the territory
_ do not proposed for change of
organization or
reorganization.
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in
accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government
Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows:
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please print) Assessor's Election
name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct
Date signature) City/State/Zip No.* No.**
3-24�z aA4,� lJgySUPZAaD WR7 -O
a U 11 r;Lr/JV V, e p • yso l-r
/ Phone:
I- 0
s'-�H-9i �GLvrcr -uf'an/✓o wln , :36L-03-o5/
Av I /f F- S'CrHE _CIIPERT/NC.fil. SSOfy
Phone: (qoog) - 16is
Phone ( ) -
* - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for
landowner-initiated proposals.
** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter
initiated proposals.
• 10
City of Cupertino (408)252-4505
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with
any petition to the City for a change of organization (annexation or
detachment) or reorganization (multiple annexations and/or detachments)
made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of
1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.)
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: Upland Way 92-04
Annexation )
Detachment ) to/from The City of Cupertino
Reorganization) (City or Spec. District)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
X - The City of Cupertino as Lead Agency for environmental review
(Name of City/District)
of the project, has already prezoned
(prezoned? other approval action?)
the territory on Sept 8, 1981 and in compliance with CEQA, has:
(date)
determined that the annexation is categorically exert from
provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal.Adm.Code Sec.
(cite class exemption section) .
X completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the
annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is
attached to this application.
City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the
environmental review of the project and the completed Environmental
Information Form required by Planning staff is attached to this
application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 252-4505.)
Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to
Cal. Acts. Code Sec. because
CHARAC=STICS OF TflE AREA
1. Number of acres 2.278
2. Number of inhabitants 2
3. Number of registered voters 2
4. Number of dwelling units 1
5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific) :
residential
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are
under contract under provisions of the Williamson
Act:
C. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken
to release the above parcel(s) from the contract?
6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied
by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing
requirement for city annexations) :
b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if
and when the territory is annexed to the City? YES_ NO
If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought.
7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being
proposed for the territory, if any, and when this development is
expected to begin.
new SFDWL
8. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of
assessment and ownership? YES X NO
If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide
justification for approving the boundary change as proposed:
Suppl. Appl. -2-
9. Lb the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island,
corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES NO X
If YES, answer the following questions:
a. Number of acres in the island, corridor
or strip? (If more than one island is being
created, indicate the acreage of each island.)
b. Number of inhabitants?
C. Assessed value?
d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip?
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island:
f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation
of an island? YES NO
If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified.
SERVICES
10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in
the City or District's urban service area: YES X No—
ll. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development
be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing
sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES_ NOg
If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc-
tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be fin-
anced by the formation of a special assessment district? YES NO X
If YES, describe service(s) or inprovement(s) and the average cost per
resident/landowner of the district.
Service/iirprovement:
Cost: $ fyr. for _ yrs. $_--/yr. for _ yrs.
Supp• Appl. -3-
13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and
County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal.
(Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air
Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water
Importation. ) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this
information) :
Cupertino Elementary District Mid Peninsula Open Space District
Fremont High School District Cupertino Sanitary District
Foothill Community College District
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
14. Please provide the information requested below:
a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexatoin/detachment/reor-
ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent
by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with
date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated
by property-owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or
print names, addresses, etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed
land (not improvements) valuation, and, if 100% property-cxmer
consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be
added prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100%
property owner consent is obtained.
Assessed
Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of
Date (print name below) City/State/Zip Tel. No. No. Land
See petition 11845 Upland Way 253-1673 366-03-051
Harlan T Sethe Cupertino,CA 95014
See petition
Ruth F. Sethe
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.)
* "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last
Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner,
then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next
Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement
of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency
owning lard." Government Code Section 56048.
Supp• Appl. -4-
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal)
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located
within the annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by this
application and that the _ (number) signatures above represent all of
the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURMM CEMFY that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City will make
determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing.
Late:
City Clerk
(Seal)
City of Cupertino
b. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reor-
ganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed
by name, address, parcel number and assessed land valuation
below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be
held for less-than-100%-consent applications.
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.)
C. FOR NOT-100% CONSENT pROposALs, list all registered voters
residing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/re-
organization if different from the landowners shown in 14a. and
14b. above.
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and
attach.)
Supp• Appl. -5-
15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to
exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Director of
Community Development's Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in
addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or
district) :
Street Address
Name City/State/Zip
(1)
(2)
(3)
16. I hereby certify that all LAFCD filing requirements will be met and
that the statements made in this application are to the best of my
knowledge accurate.
Travice Whitten 10300 Torre Avenue
(Print name of person complete- Cupertino, CA 95014
ing this application) (Address)
,�2 6/9Z
(Signature) (Date)
NUPE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this
application be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of
this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential
development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to
submit this information to the appropriate school district(s) and the
signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement
has been met.
.a
CM OF CUPMTIN0
NBSATIVE DECLARATION
July 9, 1990
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City
Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4,
1974, January 17, 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following
described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino on July 9, 1990.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION --
Application No. (s) 4�IM-90 and 10-FA-90
Applicant Edward M. Giuliani
Property Owner Alice Ruth Norman
Location North of adjacent to the southerly
terminus of Upland Way
DISCRETIONARY ACTION RFOUEST
TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide 0.97 acres with an average slope exceeding 200
into two lots of 14,200 s.f. and 16,700 s.f. respectively, and annexation
of unincorporated territory within the Spehere of Influence to the City of
Cupertino.
FINDINGS OF DECISION IU NG BODY
The Planning Commission granted a Negative Declaration finding that the
project is consistent with the General Plan, that there are no significant
environmental impacts which have not been appropriately mitigated, and
that there are no significant growth-inducing influences associated wiyth
extension of utility services necessary to serve-the project area.
Robert Cowan
Director of Community Development
CERTIFICATF. OF TNF Q-M CLJMK
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the
Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on July 10, 1990.
Dorothy Lorne us, CMC
City Clerk
erc\nd10ea90
F7 z 99
i
CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue
Department of Planning 6 Development Cupertino,CA.95014
(408)252-4642
' ' p --
EA File No.
Case File No(s). Lyj-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Attachments?
PROJECT TITLE 1'L.d1n1'I'JL .dAY/LU1' YL1'1'
PROJECTLOCATION 11d ;0 OPi.A:JD WAY , CUPERTI!J0 , CA. y5J14
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pi<OP0-jR i'0 SiI Pr)TVTF)F. LOT ( 966-0"1-.L5) Pk) lit ai A
QECON6 _PUILCAL'LF: LOT .
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING I :ILL r'Ao,1.LY .;L:iID ACL 1 .I 1'..n CiJi'isi, I .'Ill 0P' Tf .`i
PROJECT STATISTICS
. 7i'iJ :.
Site Area (ac.) 1 -iL Building Coverage � % Exist. Building =JJJ s.f. Proposed Bldg. 3 L,j11K s.f.
Zone RILS GP Designation Assessor's Parcel No. Jbu -J > -1
If Residential, Units/Gross Acre Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check)
Total No. Rental? Bedrooms Total s.f. Price Q Morita Vista Design Guidelines
Unit Type.#1 0'J s I`I 2:1ii1.L 201 J N. De Anza Conceptual
Unit Type#2 0.ris A0 [a,J r, j LD 0 S. De Anza Conceptual
Unit Type#3 0 S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual
Unit Type#4 1 1 Stvns. Crk. Blvd. Conceptual
Unit Type#5 0 Stvns. Crk. Blvd. SW& L'scape
If Non-Residential, Building Area s.f. FAR Max. Employees/Shift
Parking Required Parking Provided
Project site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area Yes XXX No—
ray S p�thl NiMyl
S } IN 9 ry ��i��ysu �^�Y/i,J .n, <<A sa'
A) GENERAL PLAN SOURCES D) OUTSIDE AGENCIES
1) Cupertino General Plan, Land Use Element 22) County Planning Department
2) Cupertino General Plan, Public Safety Element 23) Adjacent City's Planning Department
3) Cupertino General Plan, Housing Element 24) County Department of Environmental Health
4) Cupertino General Plan_Circulation Element 25) MidPeninsula Regional Open Space District
5) Cupertino General Plan, Environmental Resources 26) County Parks and Recreation Department
Element 27) Cupertino Sanitary District
6) Cupertino General Plan,Appendix A—Hillside Develop- 28) Cupertino Union School District
ment 28) Fremont Union High School District
7) Cupertino General Plan, Land Use Map 30) Pacific Gas 6 Electric Company
8) City Ridgeline Polity 31) Central Fire District
9) Noise Element Amendment 32) County Shentf
10) Cupertino General Plan Constraint Maps 33) CALTRANS
34) County Transportation Agency
B) CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 35) Santa Clare valley Water District
11) Tree Preservation Ordnance 778 E) OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS
12) City Aenal Photography Maps
13) 'Cupertino Chronicle'(California History Center, 1976) 36) BAAOMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses
14) Geological Report(site specific) 37) FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps
15) Parking Ordinance 1277 38) USDA,'Soils of Santa Clara County'
16) Zoning Map 39) County Hazardous Waste Management Plan
17) Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 40) County Heritage Resources Inventory
C) CITY AGENCIES F) OTHER SOURCES
18) Cupertino Planning 3 Community Development Dept 41) Project Plan SeVApplication Materials
19) Cupertino Public Works Dept 42) Field Reconnaissance
20) Cupertino Parks 6 Recreation Department 43) Experience with project of similar scope/characteristics
21) Cupertino Water Utility 44) City Noise Ordinance
45) ABAG Projections Series _
�c',i,,,$$� ss� bsY s �y¢� fin` /���1�� yK�'y'd Sf✓sw$x b$3'
1) Complete aU information requested on the initial Study 4) When explaining any YES response,label your answer
cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY clearly (Example: " N - 3. Historical") Please try to
WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLI- respond concisely, and place as many explanatory
CABLE. responses as possible on each oaoe.
2) Consult the Initial Study Source List;use the materials 5) Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the
listed therein to complete the checklist information in Preparer's Affidavit.
Categories A through O. 6) Please attach the following materials before submitting
the Initial Study to the City:
You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if
such sources are used, jot in theirtitle(s)in the"Source" - Project Plan Set or legislative Document(1 copy)
column next to the question to which they relate. - location map with site clearly marked(when applicable)
3) If you check any of the "YES' responses to any ques YOUR •
tion. you must attach a sheet explaining the potential COMPLETE -- INCOMPLETE
impact and suggest mitigation if needed. CAUSE PROCESSINGDELAYS
IMPArr
T... YES
WILL THEPROJEC
�y1 Not Significantn(N
Cumulativ SOURCE
Significant (MitigationProposed)
A) LAND USE/GENERAL PLAN
1) Require a change from the land use designation for
the subject site in the General Plan? 0 0 0 1,7,18
2) Require a change of zoning? 0 0 Q Q 16. 18
3) Require a change or variance from an adopted
specific plan other adopted policy statement? 0 0 17, 18
4) Result in substantial change in the present land use
of the site or that of adjoining properties? EX 0 0 7, 12,
6) Disrupt or divide the physical configuration of an
established neighborhood? ® 0 7, 12, 23, 42
7) Conflict with established recreational, educational,
religious or scientific activities in the project vicinity? XX 0 7,12,16
B) GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC HAZARD
1) Be located in an area which has potential for major
geologic hazard? 0 0 0 2, 14
2) Be located on or adjacent to a known earthquake
fault? 0 2, 14
3) Be located in a Geologic Study Zone? 0 0 2
4) Be located in an area of soil instability (subsidence,
landslide, shrink/swell, soil creep or severe ero-
sion)? 0 0 2. 5. 10
5) Cause substantial erosion or siltation of a water-
course? 2, 5, 10
6) Cause substantial disruption, displacement, com-
paction or overcovering of soil either on-site or off-
site? X_ 0 0 Q Q 2, 14, 41
7) Cause substantial change in topography or in a
ground surface feature? 12, 41
8) Involve construction of a building, goad or-zaptio
ystom•on a slope of 10%or greater? Q X Q Q Q 6, 12, 41
C) RESOURCES/PARKS
1) Increase the existing removal rate, or result in the
removal of a natural resource for commercial pur-
poses (including items such as rock, sand, gravel,
trees, minerals or topsoil)? rx 0 0 5, 10
2) Result in the substantial depletion of any non-renew-
able natural resource? RX 0 0 0 Q 5
3) Convert prime agricultural land(Class I or II soils)to
non-agricultural use or impair the agricultural pro-
ductivity of nearby prime agricultural land? 0 0 0 5. 35
4) Involve lands currently protected under the William-
son Act or any Open Space easement? EX F-1 0 5, 18
5) Substantially affect any existing agricultural uses? 0 0 0 7, 16
IMPAMT
YES
WILL THE PROJECT... Not Sgni(rant Sipnifkenl Cumulatry SOURCE
Signi&ant (Mitigation (No
Proposed) Mitigatiion
Proposed)
6) Be located on, within or near a public or private
recreation facility, park,wildlife preserve, public trail
either in existence already or planned for future
implementation? '"' F� ED E:1 0 5, 10, 12, 22, 25
D) SEWAGE/WATER QUALITY
1) Result in aseptic field being constructed on soil with
severe drainfield performance limitations? X X 0 0 6, 19
2) Result in a septic field being located within 50 feet of
a drainage swale or within 100 feet of any well,water
course or water body? 0 0 0 35, 41, 42
3) Result in extension of a sewer mainline with capacity
to serve new development? Er 19, 41
4) Substantially degrade surface or groundwaterqual-
ty, or the public water supply? XY Q 0 Q Q 19, 35, 38
5) Be located in an area of water supply concern (such
as low fire flows)? 0 19. 31
E) DRAINAGE/FLOODING
1) Interfere substantially with ground water recharge? Q Q Q Q 0 19, 35
2) Substantially change the direction, rate of flow or
quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 19, 35, 41
3) Change the absorption rates, drainage patterns or
the rate/amount of surface runoff? 0 19, 35
4) Involve a natural drainage channel or streambed or
water course such as to alter the location, course or
flow of its waters? 0 35, 41, 42
5) Be located in a floodway or floodplain Area? Q 0 Q 0 Q 37
F) FLORA AND FAUNA
1) Significantly affect fish,wildlife, reptiles or plant life
by changing the diversity or numbers of existing
species, or by introducing new species, or by
restricting migration or movement? 0 0 5,
2) Substantially reduce the habitat area for fish, ani-
mals or plants? 0 0 0 0 5, 10
3) Change the existing habitat, food source or nesting
place for a rare or endangered specie of plants or
animals? 0 5, 10
4) Involve construction within 100 feet of a riparian
area? v v 0 0 0 10, 41, 42
5) Involve cutting/removal of specimen scale trees,
whether indigenous to the site or introduced? 0 0 11, 41, 42
impArr
WILL THE PROJECT... Not SipnifYE Sipniksnl� Cumulatry SOURCE
Siynifr l (Mitpation (No
Proposed) Mitipatiion
Pmposed)
G) TRANSPORTATION
1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system? ^ X 4, 19, 33
2) Cause any public or private street intersection to
function below Level of Service D? ® 0 0 4, 19
3) Increase traffichazardsto pedestrians,bicyclistsand
vehicles? XX 0 0 0 19, 32
4) Adversely affect access to commercial establish-
ments, public buildings, schools, parks or other pe-
destrian oriented activity areas? Xx 0 10, 19
5) Cause a reduction in public transportation service at
or near the project site? vv 0 0 34
6) Increase demand upon existing parking facilities, or
engender demand for new parking space? v v 18, 41
7) Inhibit use of alternative modes of transportation to
private automobile usage? X Y. 0 0 5, 19, 33, 34
H) HOUSING
1) Reduce the supply of affordable housing in the
community, or result in the displacement of persons
from their present home? 0 0 3, 18
2) Increase the cost of housing in the area,or substan-
tially change the variety of housing types found in the v 0 3, 18
community?
3) Create a substantial demand for new housing? 0 3, 18, 45
1) HEALTH & SAFETY
1) Involve the application,use,disposal or manufacture
of potentially hazardous materials? 0 31, 39, 41
2) Involve risk of explosion or other forms of uncon-
trolled release of hazardous substances? 0 0 0 31, 43
3) Involve the removal or continued use of any existing,
or installation of any new underground chemical or
fuel storage tank? X X 0 0 31, 41, 42
4) 'Be located in an area of seasonal fire danger? 2. 31
5) 'Employ technology which could adversely affect
public safety in the event of a breakdown? 0 41, 43
6) Provide breeding grounds for mosquitos or other
disease vectors? 0 24
J) AIR QUALITY
1) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 41, 43
2) Violate any ambient air quality standards,contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation,or expose sensitive receptors to substantial
concentrations of pollutants? 0 0 0 5, 36, 41
IMPACT
YES
WILL THE PROJECT... NO Not Signif"rit Significant cumulat SOURCE
Signifmnt (Mitigation (No
Proposed) Miligaliion
Proposod)
K) NOISE
1) Increase substantially the ambient noise environ-
ment of the project vicinity during construction of the
project? 0 0 9, 41
2) Result in a sustained increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity following construction of the
project? 0 9, 41
3) Result in sustained noise levels beyond the thresh-
olds of sound energy and duration limits contained in
the City's Noise Ordinance? 0 0 0 9,44
L) AESTHETICS
1) 'Be generally in conformance with applicable designy
guidelines? F ' 0 0 17, 41
2) Create an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view? 0 41,42
3) Visually intrude upon an area of natural scenic quali-
ties? 0 5. 42
4) Obstruct view of a scenic ridgeline visibile from the
valley floor? 0 0 0 0 5. 8.
5) Obstruct views of the city's adjacent hillsides from
residential areas or public lands 0 0 10, 22, 24, 41
6) Adversely affect the architectural character of an
established neighborhood or business district? 0 0 41, 42
7) Produce glare from artificial lighting sources upon
adjacent properties or public roadways? 0 0 41, 43
M) ENERGY
1) Involve the use of unusually large quantities of fossil
fuels or non-renewable energy sources? X• 0 0 5, 41
2) Remove vegetation providing summer shade orwind-
breaks to an existing or proposed building? 0 0 0 41, 42
3) Significantly reduce solar access to an adjacent
building, public recreation space or private yard? 0 41, 42
N) HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
1) Be located in an area of potential archeaological or ® O
paleontological resources? f 10, az
2) Affect adversely a property of historic or cultural
significance to the community, except as part of a
scientific study? ® 0 0 1, 18, 41, 42
IMPACT
YES
WILL THEPROJECT... Not Significant Significant Cumulativ SOURCE
Significant (Mitigation (No
Proposed) Mrigaiiion
Proposed)
O) PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
1) Produce solid waste in substantial quantities? x,y, 41
2) Induce substantial growth, or alter the location, distri-
bution,or density of the human population of an area? 0 0 1. 45
3) Cause substantial impact upon, or increase the need
for:
a) Fire Protection Services? 0 0 0 18. 31
b) Police Services? f O 0 32
c) Public Schools? 28. 29
d) Parks/Recreation Facilities? 5, 17, 19, 26
e) Maintenance of Public Facilities? 18, 19, 41
f) Other Governmental Services?
4) Cause substantial impact upon existing utilities or
infrastructure in the following categories:
a) Electricity? U 0 0 0 0 30. 41
b) Natural Gas? D O O 30, 41
c) Water? �°7 O O 21 _ -
d) Sewage treatment and disposal? 18, 41
e) Storm water management? 35, �16
5) Generate demand for use of any public facility which
causes that facility to reach or exceed its capacity? 0 0 18, 41, 43
5 -= aytMY/A 5 � 5Ry f�[l.y V�m{ t� C�
� p �:.
M.
WILL THE PROJECT...
YES NO
1) Have the potential to degrade substantially the quality of the environment, to substantially
diminish the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,to cause afish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels,to threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community,to reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California's history or prehistory?
2) Have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term
environmental goals?
3) Have environmental impacts which are individually limited,but are cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are
substantive when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
4) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
tl k 0}�N 'Ilii� 'NI�t�1 off a
I hereby certify that the information pro ided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief;
I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appro-
priate.source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevent environmental data. I hereby
acknowledge that any substantial errors detected within this Initial Study may cause cause delay or discontinuance of
related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino,its staff and authorized
agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. _
Preparer's Signature s <<< -Date
Print Preparer's Name
-P.,lNrf 'yLH . ,r.s S '�yh Y/g 6* s i
3
rr�y idsy£rslyy� /fi oa �1s!} { pf sM ( Y $&
All yam:"/11Jr i t%i,
IMPACT AREAS:
El Land Use/General Plan E] Geologic/Seismic Hazard ❑�Resources/Parks ❑ Housing
LJ Sewage/Water CuaMy ❑ Drainage/Flooding l=1 Flora& Fauna ❑ Transportation
❑ Historicai/Archaeological ETHealth & Safety ❑ Air Quality 0--Aesthetics
u
❑ Historical/Geological ❑ Public Services/Utilities ❑ Energy Aesthetics
STAFF EVALUATION
(I) 6t6LC1GIG yikZNW Mlrr 60 FEX &FO o,,l5j's Lf- i er 417-o AT' I;I oe,. MMAtT-
--UFt-t4wo -0 FARLEI. L 5-",D �j GUSH LF'nm dF 5N90 -- WI-L- Aso
.SUE 3 LOT :905vW5100 Ou W. 5117r OF UN W) WX-(
r�5� Izew%t. DF SILK cw F PR-667-15rs 7Zr0V--r aF f/I0//96
T (A� fAt�6ag ROtXN 111S�v�A�1oU OF o� N4Dk_&mT GFP l Ejft� of 3/3/90
L (4 Mt��Ep 6l IMPL +t Tal oy 6r VIZEUWC WatT QHlr (nax• --01
4elect Qt+
On the basis of this Initial Study, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds:
.s ;
That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and recommends3 £: F
that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted.
That althou although
project nificantefectontheenvironment,nosi significant
9 9 9
because mitigation measures are included in the project. ERC recommends that a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION be granted. s ' ti;—if,��.
That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that an
ENVIRONMENTAL I AC EPORT be prepared.
H
Staff Evaluator ERC Chairperson �WILt ^
Date 5 Z1i 6 Date
321992 SJA
Application No... ....................
Aft
Grant �Deeb 31oint Tenantp
MELVIN E. HEWI14S aril San tJUSA AhStf7d A ilfle CO,
JOSEPHINE E. HEWINS, his wife,
---r - — do hereby GRANT TO 3904t„ . v ,Pm405
HARLAN SETHE and
1� RUTH SETHE, his wife, . . - of
d AS JOINT TENANTS all that real property situate in the - -
O i
County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:
Above space for Recorder
, 4 ll �� w�1
Lot 11 aVae��signOc`Tdd and delineated upon that certain Map
entitled, "Tract No. 492 Marquette Heights Subdivision, a
portion of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 26, T. 7 S. R. 2
W. , M. D. B. & M. , Santa Clara County, California, " and
which said Map was filed for record in the office of the
__ Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California
on March 22, 1948 in Book 18 of Mans, pages 4 and 5.
i
WITNESS ourhand 6 this 2nd day of October , 193 7
i
,
... � .. . ..... .. �l..11 J .......................... .
t
P/)w
nr''ys�s��••nn,,4FtCAI:IFORN]A
CO {�y(JF SANTA CLARp�'
0p"lie 2ndr ,-dayof October 195 7,beforeme, Jobn W. Clark
a xo)l#y"Py hiEin County and State, personally appeared Melvin E. Hewins and Josephine E.
Hew ins known to me to
W the persons whose name s are subscribed to the foregoing instfum and ckfi'owtedged to me tha they executed the same,
\ ........................ ... ._.........................-....... ..... .._Fs - "----"-
Notary Public