89.332 Annex 96-03 Cole 89,331 BYRNE AVENUE 96-01
Askari
l
IN " 'm
UPC 14834
NoK2-153LK=1 m��.2
HASTINGS.ON
CITY OF CUPERTINO i
• FXcWT •
• No. S2032 •
DATE /4� q
• FROM RECEIVED �a/V� fis ko-�1 19 •
ADDRESS �Ck�l ✓oS C..�� 9•j�a'r
• CI511 CNECJI, HONEY •
/3 ORDER DOLLARS CENTS
• l)l ;t X' ��,i J Fe •
• �� 102 lleo. •
• RECEIVED D •
BY /
dt3W WSMESSSYSTMES.INC -ISDJI8a M5 •
•
RESOLUTION NO. 9621
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING
THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "BYRNE
AVENUE 96-01 It, APPROXIMATELY 0.172 ACRE LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF MCCLELLAN ROAD BETWEEN BYRNE
AVENUE AND ORANGE AVENUE; ASKARINAM (APN 357-14-
012)
WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of
Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.172 acre on the north side of
McClellan Road (APN 357-14-012) has been filed by property owners Aram Askarinam,
Khani Askarinam and Touran Askarinam; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9605
initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Byrne Avenue 96-01; and
WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the
proposal consent to this annexation; and
WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that the
Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an
annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within
the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the
legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the
conducting authority for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and
WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino as follows:
Resolution No. 9621 Page 2
1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the Government
Code for the annexation of property designated "Byme Avenue 96-01", more
particularly described in Exhibit "A";
2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino:
a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.172
acre.
b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory
with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy
of annexing when providing City services.
C. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the
annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment,
and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration.
d. The City Council on June 4, 1984, enacted an ordinance prezoning the
subject territory to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 zone.
e. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special
districts.
f. That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the
Local Agency Formation Commission.
g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions.
h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed
annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the
Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the
County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this
determination.
i. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it
would be difficult to provide municipal services.
j. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of
ownership.
k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan.
2
EXHIBIT A
For Annexation BYRNE AVE. 96-01
All of that certain property situate in Santa Clara County, California described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the Northerly boundary of McClellan Rd. and the Easterly
boundary of Byrne Avenue (formerly known as Buena Vista Ave.), said corner being the
Southwesterly comer of lot 180 as shown upon that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision
`A' Monta Vista", as recorded in Book P of Maps at page 20 Santa Clara County Records,
thence along the Easterly boundary of Byrne Ave. and along the Easterly line of that certain
Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled `Byrne Ave. 85-01" North 75.00 feet; thence
leaving said boundary of Byrne Avenue but continuing along the City limits of Cupertino East
100.15 feet to a point on the Easterly line of lot 177 as shown on the above mentioned Map;
thence leaving said City limits of Cupertino and heading along said Easterly boundary of lot
177 South 75.00 feet to a point on the Northerly line of McClellan Rd. and the Northerly line
of that certain Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Howell 76-9"; thence along said
boundaries West 100.15 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing 0.172 acre more or less and consisting of all of a portion of lots 177, 178, 179 and
180 as shown on the above mentioned Map.
APN 357-14-012
QKOF ESSI
I C, E. NF�sI Fi
W
No. 20597 m
�9l CIM
f 0f CALIF�Q'�
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
EN TI TLED
BYRNE AVE. 96 - 01
20 --i �— f` 30.00'
EXISTIN ANNEXATION
I BYRN AVE. 85-01
P
I 20.00' I �p
. P O
I LOT LOT LOT 1 LOT
180 179 178 177 J0
W P S J`rESS T
>1 EAST
I Q 100.15'
W o x o Q No. 20597
z 0 o 9�>
I o � o.n2 Ac.
z n (n n sryj CIVIL 1" = 50'
m F Of CAUEO�
WEST
cli POB100.15 MC CLELLAN RD . o
EXISTING ANNEXATION
HOWELL 76-9 0
EXISTING ANNEXATION
MC CLELLAN #1-A APN 357-14-012
VICINITY MAP
_ a
a — CUPERTINO CITY LIMITS
z z PROPOSED ANNEXATION LIMITS
} DOLORES
m APRIL 11, 1996
MC CLELLAN RD.
SITE
i •
Resolution No. 9621 Page 3
1. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the
commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area.
M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under
provisions of the Government Code.
3. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 35151
et seq. of the Government Code.
4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give
notice of said annexation as prescribed by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Cupertino this 3rd day of June, 1996 by the following vote:
Vote Members sf 1hf C& Council
AYES: Bautista, Chang, Dean, Sorensen, Burnett
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/ Kimberly Smith /s/ Don Burnett
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
msoluWros962 Ldoc
3
i
RESOLUTION NO. 9605
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO SETTING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF
ANNEXING AREA DESIGNATED "BYRNE AVENUE 96-01
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MCCLELLAN
ROAD BETWEEN BYRNE AVENUE AND ORANGE AVENUE;
APPROXIMATELY 0.172 ACRE, ASKARINAM
(APN 357-14-012)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a request for
annexation of territory designated "Byrne Avenue 96-01" from property owners, Aram
Askarinam, Khani Askarinam and Touran Askarinam; and
WHEREAS, the property, 0.172± acre on the north side of Almaden Avenue
between Orange Avenue and Byrne Avenue (APN 357-14-012) is contiguous to the City
of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and
WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and
WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on June 4, 1984, to
City of Cupertino RI-7.5 zone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmental review
completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and
description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section
56826, the boundaries to be defmite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance
with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and
WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above
certification has been paid; and
1
Resolution No. 9605 Page 2
WHEREAS, as provided in Govemment Code Section 56826 the City Council of
the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an
annexation to the City; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider annexation of the
territory designated 'Byrne Avenue 96-01" at their regular meeting of June 3, 1996.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 6th day of May, 1996 by the following vote:
Y= MembersdtheCityCouncil
AYES: Bautista, Chang, Dean, Burnett
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sorensen
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/ Kimberly Smith /s/ Don Burnett
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
=nexa iN"1.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
For Annexation BYRNE AVE. 96-01
All of that certain property situate in Santa Clara County, California described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the Northerly boundary of McClellan Rd. and the Easterly
boundary of Byrne Avenue (formerly known as Buena Vista Ave.), said corner being the
Southwesterly comer of lot 180 as shown upon that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision
`A' Monta Vista", as recorded in Book P of Maps at page 20 Santa Clara County Records,
thence along the Easterly boundary of Byrne Ave. and along the Easterly line of that certain
Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Byrne Ave. 85-01" North 75.00 feet; thence
leaving said boundary of Byrne Avenue but continuing along the City limits of Cupertino East
100.15 feet to a point on the Easterly line of lot 177 as shown on the above mentioned Map;
thence leaving said City limits of Cupertino and heading along said Easterly boundary of lot
177 South 75.00 feet to a point on the Northerly line of McClellan Rd. and the Northerly line
of that certain Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Howell 76-9', thence along said
boundaries West 100.15 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing 0.172 acre more or less and consisting of all of a portion of lots 177, 178, 179 and
180 as shown on the above mentioned Map.
APN 357-14-012
?%OFESSt6,,
5 E. NF�sI`Si
� . 20597 m
�9l CIYII ��'
�Of CAL►FO��
EXHIBIT B
F��PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
EN TI TLED
BYRNE AVE. 96 - 01
20 —i —I— I` 30.00•
EXISTIN ANNEXATION
I BYRN AVE. 85-01 I �SCP
P
20.00• I �O
. P 0
I LOT� LOT LOT�LOT S�OINK 4
180 179 178 II 177 �g
I EAST Pe YHOEESSr,1:r T
QI 100.15 4aF��pS E'
LLB _ . No. 20597 m
Iz 0 Lo 0.172 AC. 'o 00 9�>
z n n l rr9lF Cm1. ���P 1" = 50'
ml �F CALIF
WEST
P08100.15 MC CLELLAN RD. 0
EXISTING ANNEXATION
HOWELL 76-9 0
EXISTING ANNEXATION
MC CLELLAN #1-A APN 357-14-012
uj � VICINITY MAP
a — — —CUPERTINO CITY LIMITS
ui
z' PROPOSED ANNEXATION LIMITS
m DOLORES o
APRIL 11, 1996
MC CLELLAN RD.
SITE
County of Santa Clara C,oU
Environmental RCSGUrces Agency
Building Inspection/Utrtd Devclopinent Engineering and Surveying
County Government Center, Easl Wing
70 West I Ict Ie 11:19 Slreel. 7111 Fluor
San Jose. Calitornia 951 10
Bldg. Inspec. (408)299-2351 Land Devel. 299-2871 FAX 27", 537
April 22, 1996
Kim Smith, City Clerk
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
The attached map and description dated April 11, 1996, of territory proposed
for annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled BYRNE AVENUE 96-01 is in
accordance with Government Code Section 56826. The boundaries of said territory are
definite and certain. The proposal is in compliance with the Local Agency Formation
Commission's road annexation policies.
Martin D. Marcott
County Surveyor
Attachment
cc: LAFCO Executive Officer (w/attachment)
Board of supervisors: Michael M. Honda, Blanca Alvarado, Ron Gonzales.James T. Beall Jr.. Dianne McKenna
County Executive: Richard Wittenberg
EXHIBIT A
For Annexation BYRNE AVE. 96-01
All of that certain property situate in Santa Clara County, California described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the Northerly boundary of McClellan Rd. and the Easterly
boundary of Byrne Avenue (formerly known as Buena Vista Ave.), said corner being the
Southwesterly corner of lot 180 as shown upon that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision
`A' Monta Vista", as recorded in Book P of Maps at page 20 Santa Clara County Records,
thence along the Easterly boundary of Byrne Ave. and along the Easterly line of that certain
Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Byrne Ave. 85-01" North 75.00 feet; thence
leaving said boundary of Byrne Avenue but continuing along the City limits of Cupertino East
100.15 feet to a point on the Easterly line of lot 177 as shown on the above mentioned Map;
thence leaving said City limits of Cupertino and heading along said Easterly boundary of lot
177 South 75.00 feet to a point on the Northerly line of McClellan Rd. and the Northerly line
of that certain Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Howell 76-9"; thence along said
boundaries West 100.15 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing 0.172 acre more or less and consisting of all of a portion of lots 177, 178, 179 and
180 as shown on the above mentioned Map.
APN 357-14-012
Q\ioF ESSlp��
E. NFlsl Fy
NN 20597 ,r^„
9 CIVIL �P
lF�f. CALS'���
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
EN TI TLED
BYRNE AVE. 96 - 01
20 —i ~� I` 30.00'
EXISTIN 3 ANNEXATION
I BYRNE AVE. 85-01 I �SqP
P
20.00' I !n0
I LO80T7 LOT LOT LOT
1 179 178 177 5�0
Lli T
Q ��OFESS47,,
I QI EAST 100 15' �P � 4FlF/
L j / W No. 20597 m
0 A
o
0 � 0.172 AC. 0 �` 9�
} z n 0 �T9lF OF CAL1F0��\ 1 50'
=
m WEST _ _
POB100.15' MC CLELLAN RD.
EXISTING ANNEXATION 41
HOWELL 76-9 0
EXISTING ANNEXATION
MC CLELLAN #11-A APN 357-14-012
- ,,,VICINITY MAP — —
Li > —CUPERTINO CITY LIMITS
¢ w
PROPOSED ANNEXATION LIMITS
z z
r DOLORES cr
m 0 APRIL 11, 1996
MC CLELLAN RD.
SITE
City of Cupertino (408) 777-3249
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of Cupertino for approval of a
proposed change of organization or reorganizations, and stipulate(s) as follows:
1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California
Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985).
2. The proposed change of organization is designated as:
BYRNE AVENUE 96-01
Sims Address: 10496 Byrne Avenue
and consists of.
X_annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO
_detachment from (name City/District)
of .172 (number of) acres on the north (n/s/e/w)
side of McClellan Road (Street/Avenue)
between Byrne Avenue (Street/Avenue)
and Orange Avenue (Street/Avenue)
and (if applicable) _annexation
_detachment
of the same to/from
(name City/District(s))
3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the territory(ies) included
in the proposal, marked Exhibit A and a map of the said territory(ies), marked Exhibit B,
are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein.
4. Territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited.
("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X unihabited.
5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence
is not of the affected city and district(s).
6. The reason(s) for the proposed annexation (annexation, detachment,
reorganization, etc.) is/are: development of a new single family residence.
0
Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2-
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to
the following terms and conditions:
8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one):
owner(s) of land within the affected territory.
registered voter(s)within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) �L do own 100% of the territory
do not proposed for change of
organization or
reorganization.
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of
Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows:
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please Drint Street Address Assessor's Election
ame be w City/State/Zip Parcel No.* or Precinct No.**
1752 R%pGa= i
Ivc CT.
/C� Ssac�� ToSc• L'ra gS12� '35�- IN-cIZ
Date: 47
/ a 19 Phone: (4o?)5i?
or
AS AI3cyE 357- iq-cIZ
Date: Phone: (qc8) qZ3- 3 8
C'r. 35:1- ;g-clt
Icornn �SIGt-r•nc.rv� S��I "SoSG� CA Cf51Z}
Date: U 12 / G Phone: (ea) IJZS-
*- For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner-initiated proposals.
**- For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident-voter initiated proposals
City of Cupertino (408) 777-3354
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with any petition to the
City for a change of organization(annexation or detachment) or reorganization(multiple
annexations and/or detachments)made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.)
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: BYRNE AVENUE 96-01
Annexation )
Detachment ) to from CITY OF CUPERTINO
Reorganization) (City or Spec. District)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
XX CITY OF CUPERTINO as Lead Agency for environmental review of the project,
(Name of City/District)
has already orezoned the territory on 6/4/84
( prezoned? other approval action?) (date)
and in compliance with CEQA, has:
determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA
pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec. (cite class exemption section.)
XX completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which
is attached to this application.
completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the
project and the completed Environmental Information Form required by Planning staff is
attached to this application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 777-3308).
Proposal is categorically exempt form provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code
Sec. because
Suppl. Appl. -1-
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA
1. Number of acres .172
2. Number of inhabitants 1
3. Number of registered voters 1
4. Number of dwelling units 1
5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific):
Single Family Residence
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract under
provisions of the Williamson Act: N/A
c. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above
parcel(s) from the contract?
6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the
affected area(Note: Prezoning is a filing requirement for city annexations):
R1-7.5
b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is
annexed to the City? YES _NO X
If yes, indicate the new zoning which will be sought?
7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being proposed for the territory, if
any , and when this development is expected to begin.
New single family home - construction to begin as soon as possible.
8. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership?
YES X NO_
If NO, please explain the reason for non-conformity and provide justification for approving
the boundary change as proposed:
Suppl. Appl. -2-
0
9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of
unincorporated territory? YES NO X
If YES, answer the following questions:
a. Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? (If more than one island
is being created, indicate the acreage of each island.)
b. Number of inhabitants?
c. Assessed value?
d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip?
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island:
f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an island?
YES—NO—
If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified?
SERVICES
10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in the City or District's
urban service area: YES X NO_
11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without
community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant?
YES NO X_
If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
Suppl. Appl. -3-
• 0
12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construction of any public
improvements to the affected territory be financed by the formation of a special assessment
district? YES NO X
If YES, describe service (s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner
of the district.
Service/improvement:
Cost: $ /yr. for ors. $ /yr. for_yrs.
13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located
within the area of this proposal. (Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco
Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importation.)
(Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information):
Cupertino Elementary School District Cupertino Sanitary District
Fremont Union High School District Mid-Peninsula Open Space District
Foothill Community College District
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
14. Please provide the information requested below:
a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who consent
to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names
and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by
property-owner petition: put"see petition" below and type or print names, addresses,
etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed land (not improvements)valuation, and if 100%
property-owner consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be added
prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained.
Date . (Print name below)_City/State/Zip Tel. No. Parcel No. Value of Land
See (408)
Petition Aram Askarinam 923-3188 357-14-012 $15,078
1252 Ridgeline Ct. San Jose,CA 95127
Khani Askarinam 1252 Ridgeline Ct. 923-3188
Touran Askarinam San Jose,CA 95127
*See next page
Suppl. Appl. 4-
* "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized
Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to
be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll;where land is subject to a
recorded written agreement of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any
public agency owning land." Government Code Section 56048.
15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number,
who are to receive copies of the Director of Community Development's Report and
mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city
or district):
Street Address
Name City/State/Zip
(1)
(2)
(3)
16. I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will.be met and that the statements made
in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate.
BERT VISKOVICH 10300 TORRE AVENUE
(Print game o person com eting this CUPERTINO, CA 95014
a at
) (Date)
NOTE: It is a gene LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this application be filed with each
school district shown on question#13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate new
residential development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to submit this
information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification
that this filing requirement has been met.
Suppl. Appl. -5-
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK(Required for 100% Consent Proposal)
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the
annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by this application and that the _(number)
signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER
CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City will make determinations
on this proposal without notice or hearing.
Date:
City Clerk
(Seal)
City of Cupertino
a. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who do not
consent to this proposal should be fisted by name, address, parcel number and assessed
land valuation below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be held for less
than 100% consent applications.
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
b. FOR NOT-100% CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters residing in the
territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization if different from the
landowners shown in 14a. and 14b. above.
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
Suppl. Appl. -6
EXHIBIT A
For Annexation BYRNE AVE. 96-01
All of that certain property situate in Santa Clara County, California described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the Northerly boundary of McClellan Rd. and the Easterly
boundary of Byrne Avenue (formerly known as Buena Vista Ave.), said comer being the
Southwesterly comer of lot 180 as shown upon that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision
`A' Monta Vista", as recorded in Book P of Maps at page 20 Santa Clara County Records,
thence along the Easterly boundary of Byrne Ave. and along the Easterly line of that certain
Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled `Byrne Ave. 85-01" North 75.00 feet; thence
leaving said boundary of Byrne Avenue but continuing along the City limits of Cupertino East
100.15 feet to a point on the Easterly line of lot 177 as shown on the above mentioned Map;
thence leaving said City limits of Cupertino and heading along said Easterly boundary of lot
177 South 75.00 feet to a point on the Northerly line of McClellan Rd. and the Northerly line
of that certain Annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Howell 76-9"; thence along said
boundaries West 100.15 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing 0.172 acre more or less and consisting of all of a portion of lots 177, 178, 179 and
I80 as shown on the above mentioned Map.
APN 357-14-012
QROFESSIp��9
E. NFl� Fy
r gNo.1zas� m
F Of G1UF��
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ENTITLED
BYRNE AVE. 96 - 01
20 —{ �-- �— 30.00'
EXISTIN ANNEXATION I �p
BYRNE AVE. 85-01 SS
P
20.00' I �p
LOT LOT LOT LOT
180 179 178 177
EASTfESS : O
�JS NF 9j
W No. 20597
-C) m
z ^ 0.172 AC. 0 n �q CIYiI �� 1" = 50'
lF Cf CA
m
` WEST — — — — —
P08100.15' MC CLELLAN RD .
f EXISTING ANNEXATION
HOWELL 76-9
EXISTING ANNEXATION
MC CLELLAN #1-A APN 357-14-012
,i VI C I N I TY MAP — —CUPERTINO CITY LIMITS
w >
> a
a w
w 0 PROPOSED ANNEXATION LIMITS
z z
m DOLORES 0 APRIL 11, 1996
MC CLELLAN RD.
SITE
P203PAGE2117 13195235 a
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: REC FEE
Fideli'./ National Title Insurance Company RMF 3 Recorded at the Request of
Escrow No. 723805-JTJ FIDELITY NAIL TITLE CO.
Title Order No. 00723805 faICRO
BTCF 8'M.
When Recorded Mail Document FEB 1 4 1996 A.M.
and Tax Statement To: LIEN
Mr. Aram Askarinam sMPFi D BRENDA DAVIS RECORDER
20818 Dunbar Drive 1G PCOR V SiNeCluaCourtyOfflcialReoxds
Cupertino, CA 95014
A N:77F-1 4-012 GRANT DEED SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s)
Documentary transfer tax is $ 192.50
[ X 1 computed on full value of property conveyed, or
p [ 1 computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale,
r [ 1 Unincorporated Area City of Cupertino
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Arthur F. Arnell and Lois E. Arnell,
fHusband and Wife as Joint Tenants and Robert J. Dunlop and Mary E. Dunlop, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants
M hereby GRANT(S) to Aram Askarinam, A Single Man and , A Single Man and Khani Askarinam and Touran
Askarinam, Husband and Wife AS SOrr\7 Ttv,Ar1T5 in `Z-0AA OliA
Q
the following described real property in the City of Cupertino
County of Santa Clara, State of California:
SEE EXHIBIT ONE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
DATED: February 7, 1996 alu�
STATE OF 6A4FeftfdtA Arthur F. Arnell
COUNTY OF G¢SI
ON '4t-h. I Qr 1 9 9 before me, � C
✓ -e luny 0- Csw 92 personally appeared Lor E. Arnell Q
OLl M a Gw
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis Robert J. Dunlop of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons) whose -L y1
name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument anda��
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the Mary E. Ounlop
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that
by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the NOT Aav PUBIJC
person(s) acted, executed the instrument. r- STATE OF NEVADA
Counry or wasroe
Witness my hand and official seal. =' IAELANIE GRIGG
� / My AppC n[ .e 'Eaores Jan 28.'99,
Signature rz
i
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
FD-213 (Rev 9/94) GRANT DEED
PQe3Pa 9
• ( Order No. 723805
EXHIBIT "ONE"
PARCEL ONE:
Portion of Section 179 and 180, as shown upon that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision
'A' Monta Vista", which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder of the County
of Santa Clara, State of California on April 11, 1917 in Book P of Maps, at page 20, and more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the Northerly line of McClellan Road with the Easterly
line of Buena Vista Avenue, said corner being the Southwesterly corner of Section 180, as
shown upon the Map above referred to and running thence along the Northerly line of
McClellan,Road Easterly 50.08 feet to the common corner for Sections 179 and 178 as shown
on the above map, and running thence Northerly along the dividing line between said Sections
179 and 178, 75 feet; and running thence Westerly and parallel with the Northerly line of
McClellan Road 50.08 feet to a point on the Easterly line of Buena Vista Avenue; and running
thence Southerly along the Easterly line of Buena Vista Avenue, 75.00 feet to the place of
beginning.
PARCEL TWO:
All of Lots 177, 178, 179 and 180 as shown upon that certain Map entitled, "Map of
Subdivision 'A' Monta Vista" which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder of
the County of Santa Clara, State of California on April 11 , 1917 in Book P of Maps at page
20.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that certain parcel of land described in the Deed from Josephine
Yuill to Lula Ingraham, dated February 13, 1941 and recorded February 13, 1941 in Book
1022 Official Records, page 295, and being more particularly described as follows:
Portion of Sections 179 and 180, as shown .upon that certain Map entitled "Map of
Subdivision 'A' Monta Vista,", which map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder
of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on April 11, 1917 in Book P of Maps, at page
20 and more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the Northerly line of McClellan Road with the Easterly
line of Buena Vista Avenue, and said corner being the Southwesterly corner of Section 180,
as shown upon the map above referred to; and running thence along the Northerly line of
McClellan Road, Easterly 50.08 feet to the common corner for Sections 179 and 178, as
shown on the Map above referred to; and running thence Northerly along the dividing line '
between said sections 179 and 178 75 feet, and running thence Westerly and parallel with
the Northerly line of McClellan Road, 50.08 feet to the point on the Easterly line of McClellan
Road, 50.08 feet to the point on the Easterly line of Buena Vista Avenue, and running thence
Southerly along the Easterly line of Buena Vista Avenue, 75.00 feet to the point of beginning.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof described as follows:
The Northerly 43.30 feet, front and rear measurements of Lots 177, 178, 179 and 180 as
shown on that certain Map entitled "Map of Subdivision A Monta Vista", which map was filed
for record in the office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on
April 11, 1917 in Book P of Maps, page 20
Assessors Parcel No: 357-14-01 2
2
• • P203PAGE2I 18
Title or type of Document Deed
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Number of Pages 1 Date of Document
Signer(s) Other than named below
County of Santa Clara
On Feb. 8, 1996 beforeme Joetta Jones personally appeared
Arthur F. Arnell 6 Lois E. Arnell
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which
the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. �+ 70DP' 04"Q474'
JOEfTAJONES
WITNESS my hand and official seal. U Comm.No•1CiC722 D
NDTARY F'Jq_C•CALIfDF4QIA
n
NTf
Signature (Seal) < SAl*'IACLARACOL
Notary Public ' d fors 'd my and State My Comrriseion Expires February 12,1996
Tide or type of Document
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Number of Pages Date of Document
Signer(s)Other than named below
County of
On before me personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which
the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
Notary Public in and for said County and State
UD01 (Rev.4194)
Aft
BAHADOR ASKARINAP EXPLANATION AN+DU+T 741
1252 RIDGELNE CT.
SAN JOSE,CA 95127
(6gB)\9233189 11-24-1210
ly
COUNT �tev (•1 re C, r tee„ e'— DOLLARS CHECK
AMOUNT
DATE TO THE ORDER OF DESCPvnON CHECK
PQ HUAIBER
1$ 0..— ` 0'C �c r— Cfr_ P'E'<S — At-j iz- _ 9h%-/Z. 4'A $ 13 S.
all
WELLS FARGO BANK
CUPERTINO OFFICE CUPERTINO,CA 95014 ;
000074L11■ 1: 12L0002481:0478 6779
EXPLANATION AMOU NT
BAHADOR ASKARINAM 739
1252 RIDGELINE CT.
SAN JOSE,CA 95127
(408)92378
11-24-1210
JUNT uv�ryf '"' If .2— �a�••' �DOLLARSi CHECK
cell AMOUNT
WTE TO THE ORDER OF DESCRIPTION CHECK
P NUMBER
• d ��� IO1 user-�•-0 Pees - 96�y� �"�5 $ � i 3 �.
O11
WELLS FARGO BANK
CUPERTINO OFFICE CUPERTINO,CA 95014 0
11'00073911' 1: L2L0002481:0478 6779 '
BAHADOR ASKARINAM rjEEXPLANAMNEAMOUNT 740
1252 RIDGEUNE CT.
SAN JOSE,CA 95127
(4D8)92"188 11-24-1210
AY
FOUNT Iwo �f �`� .�l'� ~� 1� DOLLARS, ACHECK
MOUNT
CHECK
DATE TO THE ORDFAK OE9LAIPi10111 NUMBER
s_. "G-y. _ 46 �yZ
1011
WELLS FARGO BANK
CUPERTINO OFFICE CUPERTINO,CA 95014
112 0 0 0 7 4 011' 1: L2L0002481:0478 67793311'
alp
a
City of Cullen Ino
NIiCATIVI'. 1)IiC1.ARA,rION••
May 21 . 1984
As pruvidcd by the htiviroumeutal Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City
Council of th, City of Cupertinu on March 27, 1973, as amended, the following
described project was granted a ",egative Declaration by the City Council of
Lhe City of Cupertino on May 21, 1984.
jr I and Location
Application 4-EA-84 Applicant: City of Cupertino (Old Munta Vista area)
Location: Generally bounded by Granada Avenue to the
north, lmperial Avenue to the east,
McClellan Road to the south and by the
westerly boundary of the Blackberry
Farm Golf Course to the west.
Discretionary Action Request: Prezone and rezone
approximately 97 acres within the Old Munta Vista
area to R1-8 (Residential Single-family), H1-7.5
(Residential Single-family), P (Planned Devetopment
with a Residential 4.4-12 dwelling units per gross
acre), P .(Planned Development with a Residential
4.4-7.7 dwelling units per gross acre), P (Planned
Development with ]light Industrial and Residential) ,
P (Planned Development with Agriculture/Recrea Unnal),
and BQ (Public Building) zoning districts.
Findings of Decisionmaking Body_
The City Council granted a Negati aG l er. 'pit, consistent
_- with the General Plan.and ha ncis'�`" fic vQn n mPa_,. . �f y
n.
r u
A. g; <PIaaning DIrectur �, r
eta
r .
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed
in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on May
22, 1984.
a �
eputy City Clerk �1
Initial Stec
City Of CL'0ert'nO
Environmental Assessment Procedures
E. A. File Number(s) -IiA-B�
Application F e Nu=ber(sl L-%-84
Date Pebrunry 27 , 1984
The California Environmental Quality Act Of 1970, as amended, requires public
agencies to evaluate public and prirate projects to determi-ie their poten.--za1
impact on the environment.
' 1. This worksheetis intended to provide guidance for both you, the applicant, and
City officials in assessing a proposed project to determine whether it may or
may not have a significant impact on the environment.
If, Hased upon the information provided below, the City makes a dererm-4nation that
your project may have a significant impact on the en r-'--c=enc, you.will be required
to prepare an Environmencal Impact Report as provided by State law and the City
of Cupertino 's Environmental Assessment requirements. 1.
Detailed information regarding the environmental assessment procedure is ava{l-
able from the Director of Planning and Development.
Pert 1
Inrormetion to be completed by the Applicant
Project Type (Pre)Zcni.-ig Tentative Hap L I Other
Use Permit �- I Variance
Old HOIlLa Visca Aran geueraliy uuunuec oy ranaoa ven-Ti ue to the nortu,*'triperial
Location Avenue to the east, Hcclellan Rond to the sc .th and by the westerly boundary of
the iiincKoerry Farm l.nll COUrSe CO the west.
Applicant City or: Cupertino
Address of Applicant 10300 Torre Avenue , Cupertino , CA 95014 Phone (408) 252-4505
General Description of Project Precone and rezone the above areas to zoning
districts cansistenr. with the General Plan . The nrojert site contains apprnximately
g7 acres.
Description of Project (conc 'd. )
Sue Details of t-he Proiecc
I. Sire a: sizey/A
2. Lzcensity of Development
(a) If residencia_:
(1) Number of units per gross acre
(2) Residencies Unit Schedule:
Own err Na. a; S'zs Esciaatea total
Rercal ( ship I Bedrooms Sa.ft ( Sales Pr'ce ( Number
Unit type J1
Unit type 02
Unit type 03
Unit type 04
Unit type 95
TGt4?
(3) Percentage in area of building coverage
Percentage in area of recreational open space
(4) Park:Lng required Parking proposed
(b) If cacmiercial , industrial, or institutional:
(1) Building square footage-
(2) Percentage of buLlding coverage of site
(3) Estimate of ma:—mum number of employees per shift
(4) Paz'.cng required Park-4ig proposed
Cuestiens Related to Potential Iaoact cf P-oiect
A. social/cultural Impacts : Yes Havbe No
(1) Will the proposed prciect result in the dis-
placement of people? X
(1) Will the proiec- a1t-_ the employment base
of the cc:=un_tf? R
(3) Wig' the project -.'_tar the housing needs
of the community? x
(4) Does the proposed project affect a historical
or archaelogical site? X (Note 1)
(Page 4)
B. Physical Impacts:
(1) Will the project result in a change of a natural
body of water, vegetative cover, or land form? X
(Z) Will the project result in a change in a scenic
view or vista from e_v{sting residential area
or public lands or roads?
(3) Will the project change the development pattern,
scale or character of general area of project? X
(4) Will the construction and/or operation of the
project result is significant amount of solid
waste, litter, dust, ash, smoke, fames or
odors in the vicinity? R
(3) W411 the project result im a change in stream
or ground water quality or quantity or altera-
tion of e_asting drainage patterns? R
(6) Will the project substantially change we—sting
noise or vibration levels in the vicinity? X
(7) Is the project site on f'1 ' ed land or an
slope of 10Z or greater? x
(3) Does the project involve the use or disposal-
of potentially hazardous material' s such as
toxic substances , flammable or e_:plos'-Ve? X
(9) Is the project a phase of an e= sting or
future larger project cc series of projects? X
-3-
Descriocion of the Env' ronme^tal Sett?n2
?rov de the fallowing info rmation on a separate attachment:
(_) Describe the project site as it exists before the proiecc,
including information on topography, sail stability, plants
and animals , and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
structures . A plot: plan may be required for the descriatian.
(3) Describe the sur_ounding .properties, including infa rac'_en on
Plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commer-
cial, ecc. ) , intensity of land use (one-family, apartment
houses , shops, department stares, etc. ) , and scale of devel-
opment (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.) .
CZRTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached e_.-chibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initiall evalluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information pre-
sented are true and correct to the best of my kncvledge and
belief.
(Signature)
For G cT�/ f%F C�CJP�7'�fltia
(1) The project site is comprised of e:: lsting urban development including n
acre golf course and picnic ground recreation complex. The entire area
has general historic value. A few structures = hnve greater historical
value as scparate entities. The recreation complex is located In Lite
100-year. evcnc flood plan Ear Stevens Creek.
(2) The project area is bordered by the Old N.onta Vista Commercial District
to the north, by the bent Valley Industrial Park to the east and by
single-Enmily residential neighborhoods to the south and west .
Forf I I
Inrormation to be complefec� by City OFricicls
A. Pri=ary General Plan Considerations : Yes V-,Ibe No
(1) Is the project in violation of the City of
Cupertino ' s adopted General Plan?
(2) Will the project burden public utilities and
services?
(a) Fire and police services x
(b) Parks and recreation system x
(c) Schools x
(d) Water system x
(e) Sever system x
(f) Stogy system x
(g) Solid waste x
(3) Is the project side outside of the Urban Ser-
vice Area of the City as defined by Santa
Clara County Loco' Agency Formation Commission? x
B. Social/Cultural impacts-
(1) W+?1 the proposed project result in the dis-
placement of people? x
(2) Will the project alter the emplcyment base
of the community? x
(3) Will the project alter the housing needs
of the community? x
(4) Does the proposed project affect a histori-
cal or archaelogical site? x
(5) Will the proposed project eliminate an
exert-ng recreational use at the project site? {
(6) Does the proposed project decrease public
access to any public body of water or recrea-
ticnal area? x
(i) Will the proposed project alter the lecatien,
distribution , density or grc•.th rate of the
human population of an area? x
(8) WL'1 the project resuic in: Yes Mavbe No
(a) The disturbance of a natural or man—made
feature in the prciect area -hick is unique? y
(b) The obscruction of a scenic visca open to
the public? K
C. Physical L--cacts :
(l) Will the proposed project result in the exposure
of people or property to geologic ha=ards such
as earthquakes, landslides, muds'—ides, ground
failure or sim'?ar hazards?
(2) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of -the sail? x
(c) Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? x
(d) The destruction, covering or modifica—
tion of any unique geologic or physical
feature? X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of
sail—, either on or off the site? X
(3) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? x
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? x
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? x
(4) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Changes in absorption races, drainage
patterns or the race and amount of surface
water runaff? x
(b) Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? x
(c) Discharge into surface waters , or
in anv alteration of surface water qualicy,
including but not Limiced to temperature ,
dlsealved e.cygen or turbidity?
(8) W'1 the project result in: Yes Maybe NO
(a) The disturbance a£ .a natural or man-^::.de
feature -.. the project az_o uhich is unique?
(b) The obscructian of a .scenic vista open to
the public? y
C. Physical I--pacts :
(1) Will the proposed project result in the exposure
of people or property to geologic ha_ards such
as earchauakes, landslides, =udslides, ground
failure or s4--'! rr ha_ards? X
(2) WE 1 the proposed project result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic subst:actures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? X
(d) Tne destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or physical
feature? X
(e) Any increase in wind or cater erosion of
soil, either on or off the site? X
(3) Wi1! the proposed project result in:
(a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
(4) W{ll the proposed project result in:
(a) Changes in absorption rates, dta=rage
patterns or the race and amount of surface
water runoff? X
(b) Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? X
(c) Discharge into sur=ace waters, or
in any alteracian of surface water quality,
including buc not limited to temperature ,
dissolved o:cygen or turbidity? ;<
Yes Xa •be No
(d) Alteration of the direction or race of flow
of ground water? X
(a) Change in the quantity of ground waters,
e_cher through direct additions Cr With-
drawals , or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or escuvac'_on? Y
( ) Substantial reduction in the amount of
Wacer ache_n;ise available for public water
supplies? X
(g) Ecposure of people or property to water-
related ha=ands such as flooding or tidal
Wave. {
(5) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species; or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs , grass, craps, and aquatic plants? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare ar endangered species of plants? X
(c) Introduction of new species of plants into `
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
X
crop?
(e) Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms a-, insects)? X
(f) Reduction'of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species- Of animals? R
(g) Introduction of nev species of an4_.ma15
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? X
(h) Deterioration to existing fish or will d1'-=e
habitat?
(6) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Increase in existing noise levels?
(b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x
(7) Does the proposed project signi-ficantly affect
the potential use e:ctraccion or canservation of
a scarce natural resource such as agricultural
Land , a mineral deposit, or woodland?
Yes Mavbe Ic
(8) Will the proposed project involve the use,
storage, or disposal of hazardous mac_rials? {
(9) Will the proposed project result in :
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy? x
(b)' Subscancia-1- increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or .require the development
cf neu sources of energy? X
(10) Will the proposed project result in:
(a) Generation of substantia1 additional vehiv a-
movemenc? Y
(b) Effects an existing parking facilities, or
demand far new parking? X
(c) Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
t ion sYstemS?
v
(d) Alterations to. present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goads? Y
t
(e) Alterations to waterbarne, rail or air
traffic? Y
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
(11) Mandatory Findings of Significance:
(a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal .or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistary? X
(b) Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
Lang-term, environmental goals? (a short-
term impact an the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time, while long-term impacts will
endure into the future.) X
Yes Havbe No
(c) Does the project have impacts which are
individually 14_^.4ced , but cumulatively con—
siderable? (A project may impact on two or
acre separate resources where the impact on
each resour—ce is relatively sma", bur where
the effecr'af the total of these impacts
on the environment is sign�Picant. ) ,�
(d) Does the project have e^.•r'_rcnmencal effects
which w'>> cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings , either dir__tly or
'-directly? X
Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
(Nate: Use additional sheets if necessary.)
Da e---Linacicn
On the bass of this initial evaluation, the Environmental Review .Cammittee finds:
_I That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect an the environ—
ment, and therefore recommends the GRANTING OF A NEGATIVE DEC..ARATION.
I That although the proposed project could have a sign{°icant effect an the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
of the mitigation measures described an an attached sheet have been added
cc the project. It is recommended that A NEGATIVE DECLIRATION BE PREPARED.
�i That the proposed project HAY have a significant effect an the environment,
and an EYVIRONHENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requ'r ed.
Dare
/ ' an, Environmental Rev'ieewwfCCoocztt<iccee