Loading...
CC 07-02-2024 Item No. 7. Housing Element Zoning_Written Communications (3)From:Connie-Comcast Swim5am To:City Clerk Subject:Fwd: 2024-7-2 CC Agenda Item 7, Public Comments Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 8:00:54 PM Attachments:2024-7-2 CC Agenda Item 7 Public Communicatons.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From Connie's iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Swim5am (Connie Cunningham)" <Swim5am@comcast.net> Date: July 2, 2024 at 3:37:40 PM PDT To: Connie Cunningham <swim5am@comcast.net> Subject: 2024-7-2 CC Agenda Item 7, Public Comments Dear City Clerk, please add these to the written documents for the record. Thank you, Connie Cunningham 1 Honorable Chair Mohan, Vice Chair Fruen, Councilmembers Wei, Chao and Moore I am Connie Cunningham, Housing Commission, speaking for myself only, I have been a homeowner for 37 years. Our children attended local schools. In the early 90’s, after college, they moved away from Cupertino because the cost of homes was too high. The situation is worse now for our students who graduate from high school. Thank you, City Council, for adopting the Housing Element in May! I fully support that extraordinary document. Tonight, I urge you strengthen it with zoning to affirmatively further fair housing, a key goal of this 6th Cycle. HCD must agree and approve this re- zoning, as well as the Housing Element. Thank you to Staff for your very good work on the rezonings to date. New Chapter 19.38 that includes universal design standards for people of all ages and abilities, 2 New Chapter 19.50 Emergency Shelters: State Law AB 2339. Homelessness is rising. Our community critically needs an emergency shelter. It is critical to provide homes for all incomes and abilities, and also to provide climate protections for all residents. Question: Staff commented on lot coverage on Page 7 Para 1.b. of their Report, dealing with the TownHome Combining District. To me, it is not clear what the change would be if they eliminated the lot coverage standard. What is that standard? How can it be written to allow developments to occur with areas for landscaping? Many Cupertino policies are related to urban heat island effect, sustainability, and maintaining an urban tree canopy. This is more complex than it sounds because of the interplay with other building codes such as FAR and parking. Cupertino for All wrote Council describing specific, actionable changes that you, as policymakers, can enact to ensure that HCD will accept them. I fully support these recommendations and urge that you adopt them. 3 These strengthen our Housing Element in fully answering the requirements of state law to affirmatively further fair housing. First, Council must remove the 5-story limit, relying only on the 70-foot height limit. Second, Council must remove the change in the definition of a duplex. Third, Council must Request staff to partner with all stakeholders in regards to staff’s recommendation to adopt Objective Development Standards. ------- These will Give home builders more flexibility to design housing of varying types and for varying incomes & abilities, without having to rely on state-law workarounds like the Density Bonus Law. ------- Thank you for your consideration and effort to foster an inclusive and vibrant Cupertino. From:Marilyn Sherry To:City Council; City Clerk Subject:For Public Comment (7/2): Item: Housing Element Rezonings Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 4:38:24 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Mohan and City Council, My name is Marilyn Sherry. I am a resident of Cupertino, a resident co-owner, with my daughter's family, of a duplex located on a lot zoned R3, which will continue to be R3 under the new plan. We recently considered adding a third unit as a second story of our duplex, to accommodate a dear friend who is aging alone, only to find that Cupertino zoning regulations would not accommodate this, even though we are zoned R3. I would like to thank our city's staff for their hard work on the proposed rezonings, which are necessary for the Housing Element to achieve full compliance with HCD. There is, however, still room for improvement. We must approach our rezonings in a manner that encourages flexibility in all types of housing. We cannot stand by and watch unnecessary restrictions cripple Cupertino’s zoning code. Council has received a letter from Cupertino for All (CFA) describing specific, actionable changes that our Council, as policymakers, can enact to enhance our rezonings and ensure that HCD will ultimately accept them. I support many of the CFA recommendations. I especially applaud CFA's call for adding greater flexibility for architects designing housing of different forms for different populations at different income levels. In particular, I think that the definition of a duplex which requires principal dwelling units to be no more than 200 square feet different from each other is absurd and needs to be removed. It does not reflect current reality in Cupertino or in other cities in the Valley. Homeowners should be allowed greater flexibility than a one-bedroom difference between units, especially if adding what is essentially an ADU. I also support parking standards for R2 and R3 lots of 1 enclosed space and 1 exposed space per principal dwelling unit (for a total of 2 parking spaces per unit per lot). This ensures that more of a lot's area can be dedicated to living space for people rather than "living space" for cars. This has the added benefit of fitting in better with existing single-family neighborhoods, which feature this level of parking as standard. Finally, I agree with CFA that a height limitation stated in feet (or meters) for R4 (or any other R1, R2, or R3) makes better sense than an 'x-story' limit. A 'story' is not a standard measure; such a 'non-standard standard' allows for uncontrolled height in buildings. All standards should be written using measurements approved by a national or international standards body. Thank you for your consideration and effort to foster an inclusive and thriving Cupertino. Best regards, Marilyn Sherry From:John To:Luke Connolly; Piu Ghosh (she/her); Pamela Wu; City Council; City Clerk Subject:Changes to Building requirements. Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 5:33:52 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Recipients: Current proposed housing element changes are totally unacceptable. To wit: Eliminating requirements for developers to provide parking, which would result in more cars being parked on our streets. Until Cupertino provides significantly better public transportation -- and when the California model of suburban design changes to the European or Japanese model of the "hub" -- in no way should parking of residences be ignored. Raising the maximum building height in our city to SEVEN floors (by aligning with the aggressive State bill, the future max building height could be even higher) Do the proponents of this change Live in Cupertino? Do they have an idea of the character of the city? Do they really think making Cupertino like The Bronx makes sense? (I suppose I need to put it: this is rhetorical.) Increasing the floor area ratio (FAR) from the current 55% to 100%, allowing for larger construction on lots. Low maintenance residences? What is being proposed recalls what I grew up with, calling it a "housing project." The "projects" were a wonderful incubator of crime, gang violence and dead-end life style. I think the English call it "Council Housing." It's a term of opprobrium. I urge you not to adopt any of the above proposals. John Michel Ricardo Road Cupertino A resident for the last 47 years. From:Rod Sinks To:City Council Cc:City Clerk Subject:Fwd: Thoughtful Rezoning - Item 7 on tonight"s agenda Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 6:34:16 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. HI City Council members, I'm resending this to ensure you receive it. Thanks, Rod Sinks ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Rod Sinks <rodsinks@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 12:07 PM Subject: Fwd: Thoughtful Rezoning To: <cityclerk@cupertino.gov> Begin forwarded message: From: Rod Sinks <rodsinks@gmail.com> Date: June 26, 2024 at 11:32:13 AM PDT To: piug@cupertino.gov, lukec@cupertino.gov, Benjamin Fu <BenjaminF@cupertino.gov>, citymanager@cupertino.org Subject: Thoughtful Rezoning Dear City Planning Leaders, As a former council member and current FUHSD trustee, I appreciate the need to make thoughtful decisions on zoning. Retaining the city's authority on land use requires that the city make meaningful efforts toward housing production, and zoning is a key tool to that end. I am broadly supportive of measures that will allow Cupertino to generate more infill housing at all income levels, but particularly for those in the missing middle and lower income levels. I also recognize that the City must approach rezoning with care toward current residents; for example, a 20 story building towering over a R-1 neighborhood that dramatically changes the viewshed from that neighborhood is bound to be counterproductive, igniting community pushback. I support these measures: 1) Removing the 5-story limit in R-4 zones to allow greater flexibility in building housing while retaining a separate cap on building height. 2) Reducing parking requirements to 1 enclosed and 1 exposed per unit in R-2 zones. 3) Allowing lot coverage of up to 50% in R-2 and R-3 zones, and 4 units in R-3. 4) Soliciting input from housing experts on other rezoning measures that would meaningfully improve our housing production. Finally, I'm writing this in my personal capacity rather than as an FUHSD trustee, but I note that both CUSD and FUHSD would benefit from more students that would result from new housing production. Sincerely, Rod Sinks From:chitrasv@yahoo.com To:Luke Connolly; Piu Ghosh (she/her); Pamela Wu; City Council; City Clerk Subject:Urgent Call to City Council and Staff Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 7:25:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Luke Connelly, Piu Ghosh, Pamela Wu, and Cupertino City Council, I am writing to express my full support for the proposed housing element draft and rezoning, as previously developed by Luke Connelly and Piu Ghosh. Please do not make any further changes to the previously drafted housing element proposal, which has already received approval from HCD. Now is not the time to allow outside influences to disrupt the process and jeopardize the prospects of Cupertino passing the housing element and extending Builders Remedy. It has come to my attention that certain advocates have suggested significant changes to the housing element draft during the last council meeting. I urge you not to accept any of those changes. This is not the time for major alterations, as doing so could lead to extreme conditions that would make Cupertino unrecognizable from its current character. Luke and Piu have done an excellent job, and we do not need additional input from those who may not fully understand the unique needs of our community. It is crucial to balance the need for new housing with the preservation of our community's character and existing standards. Increasing flexibility in rezoning and reducing parking requirements could lead to overdevelopment and strain our infrastructure. Instead of pushing for higher density and fewer restrictions, we should maintain reasonable limitations that align with Cupertino's current character. Specifically, I urge you to consider the following points: Preserving Community Character: Maintain the current 5-story limit in R-4 zones to prevent overcrowding and ensure new developments harmonize with existing neighborhood aesthetics. Retain the 55% FAR limitation to avoid excessive density that could overwhelm local resources and infrastructure. Supporting Equitable Housing: Keep the current definition of a “duplex” to avoid complications in design and development processes. Flexibility is important, but it should not come at the expense of community cohesion and established standards. Preserve existing parking requirements to ensure adequate parking availability and minimize congestion in residential areas. Maintaining Standards and Order: Uphold current lot coverage limits and minimum lot size requirements to maintain orderly development and prevent overcrowding. Retain existing interior side yard setbacks to ensure sufficient space between properties, promoting privacy and reducing potential conflicts between neighbors. Consideration of Long-term Impact: Any future ordinance updates should be carefully considered and aligned with the community’s long-term vision and needs, ensuring changes benefit all residents without compromising the quality of life. While it is crucial to address the housing needs of underrepresented communities and comply with state regulations, it is equally important to consider the potential repercussions of drastic changes. A balanced approach that maintains some current restrictions will better serve Cupertino in the long run. Thank you for your time and consideration of my perspective as a long-term Cupertino resident and current voter. This is a critical matter to me, and council members' votes on this issue will impact my decisions in the upcoming elections in November 2024 and 2026. I trust that the Council will make decisions that reflect the best interests of our entire community. Sincerely, Chitra Iyer Long time Cupertino resident and voter From:Balaram Donthi To:City Clerk; mayor@cupertino.org Subject:Municipal Code Text Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 8:19:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I am a long term resident of the city of cupertino. I am also a Commissioner of TICC. However, I am speaking on my own behalf. I support the staff recommendation without any changes.* Do NOT increase maximum floors to 7. Do NOT reduce parking requirements. Do NOT increase Floor Area Ratio (FAR) above 55%. Do NOT add any other changes Let's get the housing element approved by HCD. Thank you Balaram Donthi From:Kitty Moore To:City Clerk Subject:Agenda Item 7 Written Communications Date:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 8:46:23 PM Attachments:AppendixB_AQGHG.pdf Pages from Exhibit GPA-6 - Env Assessment.pdf Pages from Pages from Exhibit GPA-6 - Env Assessment-2.pdf Dear City Clerk, Please include the attachments to this email for Item 7. They include the air quality impacts due to the Housing Element and the health impacts each criteria pollutant can cause. Thank you, Kitty Moore Kitty Moore​​​​ Councilmember City Council KMoore@cupertino.gov (408) 777-1389 GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-9 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance AESTHETICS (AES) AES-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not have an adverse effect on a scenic vista. Policies LU-3.3, LU-6.7, LU-12.3, and RPC-3.1 Strategies LU-3.3.1, LU-12.4.1, and LU-13.7.5 Policies LU-3.3, LU-6.7, LU-12.3, LU-12.4, LU-13.7, and RPC-3.1 Strategies LU-3.3.1, LU-12.4.1, and LU-13.7.5 LTS N/A N/A AES-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings, within a State scenic highway. Policies LU-6.1 and ES-5.3 Policies LU-6.1 and ES-5.3 Strategy LU-19.3.10. LTS N/A N/A AES-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project in an urbanized area could conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A AES-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. N/A Policies LU-3.5, LU-20.6 and LU-27.8 Strategy LU-3.5.1 LTS N/A N/A AES-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to aesthetic resources. Policies LU-3.3, LU-6.1, LU-6.7, LU-12.3, and ES-5.3 Strategies LU-3.3.1, LU-12.4.1, and LU-13.7.5 Policies LU-3.3, LU-6.1, LU-6.7, LU-12.3, LU-12.4, LU- 13.7, LU-20.6, LU-27.8, ES-5.3, and RPC-3.1 Strategies LU-3.3.1, LU-12.4.1, LU-13.7.5, and LU- 19.3.10 LTS N/A N/A AIR QUALITY (AIR) AIR-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would conflict with the growth assumptions under Plan Bay Area 2040 that are applied to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) 2017 Clean Air Plan, the proposed Modified Project would therefore conflict with the air quality emissions forecast in the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan. Policy M-1.1 Strategy ES-4.1.3 Policy M-1.1 Strategies ES-4.1.1, ES- 4.1.3, and ES- 4.2.1 SU General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-2a: As part of the City’s development approval process, the City shall require applicants for future development projects to comply with the current Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s basic control measures for reducing construction emissions of PM10. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-2b: As part of the City’s development approval process the City shall require applicants for future development General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-2a and AQ- 2b have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.050(A), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements Air Quality Permit Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-10 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance projects that could generate emissions in excess of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMDs) current significance thresholds during construction, as determined by project-level environmental review, when applicable, to implement the current BAAQMD construction mitigation measures (e.g. Table 8-3 of the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines) or any construction mitigation measures subsequently adopted by the BAAQMD. AIR-2: Operation of development projects that could occur from implementation of the proposed Modified Project would generate emissions that would exceed Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s regional significance thresholds for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), and fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5). Policies ES-4.2 and ES- 4.3 Strategy ES-4.1.3 Policies ES-4.1, ES- 4.2, and ES-4.3 Strategies ES-4.1.1, ES-4.1.2, ES-4.1.3, ES- 4.2.1, ES- 4.2.2, ES- 4.2.23, ES- 4.2.4, ES- 4.2.5, ES- 4.3.1, and ES- 4.3.2 SU N/A N/A AIR-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU- 20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU-24.2, M-1.3, M-3.6, M-4.4, ES- 4.2, and HS-6.2 Strategies LU-19.2.2, LU-27.1.1, M-5.1.1, and M-9.3.2 Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU- 20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU- 24.2, M-1.3, M-3.6, M-4.4, ES- 4.2, and HS-6.2 Strategies LU-19.2.2, LU-27.1.1, M-5.1.1, M-9.3.2, and ES- 4.1.1 SU General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-4a: Applicants for future non-residential land uses within the city that: 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel-powered TRUs, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g. residential, schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the proposed Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Cupertino prior to future discretionary Project approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AQ-4a has been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.040(A), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Air Quality Technical Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-11 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance one million (10E-06), PM2.5 concentrations exceed 0.3 µg/m3, or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that Best Available Control Technologies for Toxics (T-BACTs) are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to:  Restricting idling on-site.  Electrifying warehousing docks.  Requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles.  Restricting offsite truck travel through the creation of truck routes. T-BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site development plan as a component of the proposed Project. AIR-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Policy ES- 4.2 Strategies LU- 27.1.1, ES- 4.2.1, ES- 4.2.2, ES- 4.2.3, ES-4.2.4, and ES-4.2.5 Policy ES- 4.2 Strategies LU- 27.1.1, ES- 4.2.1, ES- 4.2.2, ES- 4.2.3, ES- 4.2.4, and ES-4.2.5 LTS N/A N/A AIR-5: The emissions that could occur over the buildout horizon of the proposed Modified Project could generate a substantial increase in emissions that exceeds the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations and health risk in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin. Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU- 20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU-24.2, M-1.1, M-1.3, M-3.6, M-4.4, ES- 4.2, ES- 4.3and HS-6.2 Strategies LU-19.2.2, LU-27.1.1, M-5.1.1, M-9.3.2, ES- 4.1.3, ES- 4.2.1, ES- 4.2.2, ES- 4.2.3, ES-4.2.4, and ES- 4.2.5 Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU- 20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU- 24.2, M-1.1, M-1.3, M-3.6, M-4.4, ES-4.1, ES- 4.2, ES- 4.3and HS-6.2 Strategies LU-19.2.2, LU-27.1.1, M-5.1.1, M-9.3.2, ES- 4.1.1, ES-4.1.2, ES-4.1.3, ES- 4.2.1, ES-4.2.2, ES- 4.2.3, ES- 4.2.4, ES- 4.2.5, ES- 4.3.1, and ES-4.3.2 SU Implement General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ- 2a, AQ-2b, and AQ-4a General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-2a and AQ- 2b have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.050(A), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Air Quality Permit Requirements, and General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AQ-4a has been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.040(A), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Air Quality Technical Requirements, therefore, compliance with GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-12 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (BIO) BIO-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plan, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Policies ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-5.6, ES-7.1, and ES-7.8 Strategy ES-5.3.1 Policies LU-3.5, ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-5.6, ES-7.1, and ES- 7.8 Strategies LU-3.6.2, LU-12.4.2, and ES-5.3.1 LTS General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures BIO-1: Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Department of Fish and Game Code. If construction activities and any required tree removal occur during the breeding season (February 1 and August 31), a qualified biologist shall be required to conduct surveys prior to tree removal or construction activities. Preconstruction surveys are not required for tree removal or construction activities outside the nesting period. If construction would occur during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31), preconstruction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal or construction. Preconstruction surveys shall be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped. Locations of active nests containing viable eggs or young birds shall be documented and protective measures implemented under the direction of the qualified biologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. Protective measures shall include establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e. demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by a qualified biologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure BIO-1 has been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04050(D), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Biological Resources Permit Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-13 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance passerines and other birds. The active nest within an exclusion zone shall be monitored on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status. The radius of an exclusion zone may be increased by the qualified biologist if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The protection measures shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. BIO-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. N/A N/A NI N/A N/A BIO-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A BIO-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Strategy ES-5.3.1 Strategy ES-5.3.1 LTS N/A N/A BIO-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Policies ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-5.6, ES-7.1, and ES-7.8 Strategy ES-5.3.1 Policies LU-3.5, ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-5.6, ES-7.1, and ES- 7.8 Strategies LU-3.6.2, LU-12.4.2, and ES-5.3.1 LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-14 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance BIO-6: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan N/A N/A NI N/A N/A BIO-7: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to biological resources. Policies ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-5.6, ES-7.1, and ES-7.8 Strategy ES-5.3.1 Policies LU-3.5, ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-5.6, ES-7.1, and ES- 7.8 Strategies LU-3.6.2, LU-12.4.2, and ES-5.3.1 LTS Implement General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure BIO-1 General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure BIO-1 has been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04050(D), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Biological Resources Permit Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES (CUL) CUL-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Policies LU-6.1, LU-6.2, LU-6.3, LU-6.4, LU-6.5, and LU- 6.6 Policies LU-6.1, LU-6.2, LU-6.3, LU-6.4, LU-6.5, and LU- 6.6 LTS N/A N/A CUL-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A CUL-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A CUL-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is: (i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-15 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or (ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c). In applying the criteria set forth in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c) for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance to a California Native American tribe. CUL-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to cultural and tribal cultural resources. Policies LU-6.1, LU-6.2, LU-6.3, LU-6.4, LU-6.5, and LU- 6.6 Policies LU-6.1, LU-6.2, LU-6.3, LU-6.4, LU-6.5, and LU- 6.6 LTS N/A N/A ENERGY (ENE) ENE-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. N/A Policies HE-4.1, LU-1.1, LU-3.1, M-1.1, M-3.1, M-4.8, M- 8.1, M-8.3, M-9.2, ES-1.1, ES-1.2, ES-3.1, INF-6.1, INF- 6.2, and INF-6.3 Strategies HE- 1.3.5, HE- 2.3.12, HE-4.1.1, HE-4.1.2, HE- 4.1.3, M-8.1.3 ES- 1.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.12, ES-2.1.3, ES- 2.1.4, ES- 2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.9, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES-3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-4.2.2, INF- 6.2.1, INF-6.2.2., INF-6.2.4, INF-6.2.5, and INF-6.3.1 LTS N/A N/A ENE-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A ENE-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a substantial increase in natural gas and electrical service demands, and would not require new energy supply facilities and distribution infrastructure or capacity enhancing alterations to existing facilities. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-16 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance ENE-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to energy resources. N/A Policies HE-4.1, LU-1.1, LU-3.1, M-1.1, M-3.1, M-4.8, M- 8.1, M-8.3, M-9.2, ES-1.1, ES-1.2, ES-3.1, INF-6.1, INF- 6.2, and INF-6.3 Strategies HE- 1.3.5, HE- 2.3.12, HE-4.1.1, HE-4.1.2, HE- 4.1.3, M-8.1.3 ES- 1.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.12, ES-2.1.3, ES- 2.1.4, ES- 2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.9, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES-3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-4.2.2, INF- 6.2.1, INF-6.2.2., INF-6.2.4, INF-6.2.5, and INF-6.3.1 LTS N/A N/A GEOLOGY AND SOILS (GEO) GEO-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. ii) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. iv) Landslides, mudslides, or other similar hazards. Policies HS-5.1 and HS-5.2 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-1.1.2, HS-5.1.1, HS-5.1.2, HS- 5.1.3, HS-5.2.1, HS-5.2.2, HS-5.2.3, HS-5.2.4, and HS- 5.2.5 Policies HS-5.1 and HS-5.2 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-1.1.2, HS-5.1.1, HS-5.1.2, HS- 5.1.3, HS-5.2.1, HS-5.2.2, HS-5.2.3, HS-5.2.4, and HS- 5.2.5 LTS N/A N/A GEO-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Policies ES-5.3, ES-7.2, and ES-7.5 Strategy ES-7.2.3, Policies ES-5.3, ES-7.2, and ES-7.5 Strategies LU-12.3.1 and ES-7.2.3 LTS N/A GEO-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off- site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-17 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance GEO-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined by Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property. Policies HS-1.1, HS-5.1, and HS-5.2 Policies HS-1.1, HS-5.1, and HS-5.2 LTS N/A N/A GEO-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. N/A N/A NI N/A N/A GEO-6: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GEO-7: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact to geology and soils. Policies ES-5.3, ES-7.2, ES-7.5, HS-1.1, HS-5.1 and HS- 5.2 Strategies LU-12.3.1, ES-7.2.3, HS-1.1.1, HS-1.1.2, HS- 5.1.1, HS-5.1.2, HS-5.1.3, HS-5.2.1, HS-5.2.2, HS-5.2.3, HS-5.2.4, and HS-5.2.5 Policies ES-5.3, ES-7.2, ES-7.5, HS-1.1, HS-5.1 and HS- 5.2 Strategies LU-12.3.1, ES-7.2.3, HS-1.1.1, HS-1.1.2, HS- 5.1.1, HS-5.1.2, HS-5.1.3, HS-5.2.1, HS-5.2.2, HS-5.2.3, HS-5.2.4, and HS-5.2.5 LTS N/A N/A GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (GHG) GHG-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would exceed the net zero greenhouse gas emission threshold under Executive Order B-55-18. Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.5, LU-13.6, HE-1.3, M- 1.1, M-3.1, M-3.8, M-8.3, M-8.6, M-9.2, ES-1.1, ES-1.2, ES-2.1, ES-3.1, and INF-2.5 Strategies HE-4.1.1, HE-4.1.2, ES-1.1.1, ES-1.1.2, ES- 1.1.3, ES-1.2.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.3, ES-2.1.4, ES-2.1.6, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.9, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES- 3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-4.2.4, and INF-2.5.1 Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.5, LU-13.6, HE-1.3, M- 1.1, M-3.1, M-3.8, M-4.8, M-8.1, M-8.3, M-9.2, ES-1.1, ES-1.2, ES-2.1, ES-3.1, and INF-2.5 Strategies HE-4.1.1, HE-4.1.2, M-8.1.1, M-8.1.2, M- 8.1.3, ES-1.1.1, ES-1.1.2, ES-1.1.3, ES-1.2.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES-2.1.4, ES-2.1.5, ES-2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.9, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES- 3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-4.2.4, and INF-2.5.1 SU N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-18 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance GHG-2: The proposed Modified Project would not meet California Green Building Standards Code nonresidential voluntary Tier 2 electric vehicle parking standards and would exceed the City of Cupertino’s vehicle miles traveled reduction threshold, and therefore be inconsistent with the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan. Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.5, LU-13.6, HE-1.3, HE- 4.1, M-1.1, M-3.1, M-3.8, M-8.3, M-8.6, ES-1.1, ES-1.2, ES-2.1, ES-3.1, and INF-2.5 Strategies HE-4.1.1, HE-4.1.2, ES-1.1.1, ES-1.1.2, ES- 1.1.3, ES-1.2.1, ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES-2.1.4, ES-2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.9, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES- 3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-4.2.4, and INF-2.5.1 Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.5, LU-13.6, HE-1.3, HE- 4.1, M-1.1, M-3.1, M-3.8, M-8.1, M-8.3, ES-1.1, ES-1.2, ES-2.1, ES-3.1, and INF-2.5 Strategies HE-4.1.1, HE-4.1.2, M-8.1.1, M-8.1.2, M- 8.1.3, ES-1.1.1, ES-1.1.2, ES-1.1.3, ES-1.2.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES-2.1.4, ES-2.1.5, ES-2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.9, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES- 3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-4.2.4, and INF-2.5.1 SU N/A EA Mitigation Measure GHG-2: Future development projects in the City of Cupertino shall comply with the voluntary Tier 2 electric vehicle charging standards under the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) version that is applicable at the time of permit applications and shall illustrate compliance with Tier 2 CALGreen electric vehicle charging standards on the site plans submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Department. Additionally, the City of Cupertino shall amend the Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, of the Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC) to require that new parking amenities included in individual development projects install electric vehicle spaces in compliance with the voluntary Tier 2 standards under the CALGreen version that is applicable at the time of permit applications. The amended CMC shall require that all site plans submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Department shall illustrate compliance with Tier 2 CALGreen electric vehicle charging standards. GHG-3: The proposed Modified Project would result in vehicle miles traveled that would exceed the City of Cupertino’s reduction target, and therefore conflict with the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan and Executive Order B-55-18. N/A N/A SU N/A Implement EA Mitigation Measure GHG-2. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-19 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZ) HAZ-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Policies HS-6.1, HS-6.2, HS-6.4, and HS-6.5 Policies HS-6.1, HS-6.2, HS-6.4, and HS-6.5 LTS N/A N/A HAZ-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A HAZ-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 miles of an existing or proposed school. N/A N/A LTS Implement General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure HAZ- 4a and HAZ-4b. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-4a and Haz- 4b have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.040(B), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Hazardous Materials and in CMC Section 17.04.050(B), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Hazardous Materials Permit Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. HAZ-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Policies HS-6.1, HS-6.2, HS-6.4, and HS-6.5 Policies HS-6.1, HS-6.2, HS-6.4, and HS-6.5 LTS General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure HAZ-4a: Construction at the sites with known contamination shall be conducted under a project-specific Environmental Site Management Plan (ESMP) that is prepared in consultation with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The purpose of the ESMP is to protect construction workers, the general public, the environment, and future site occupants from subsurface hazardous materials previously identified at the site and to address the possibility of encountering unknown contamination or hazards in the subsurface. The ESMP shall summarize soil and groundwater analytical data collected on the project site during past investigations; identify management options for excavated soil and groundwater, if General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-4a and Haz- 4b have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.040(B), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Hazardous Materials and in CMC Section 17.04.050(B), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Hazardous Materials Permit Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-20 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance contaminated media are encountered during deep excavations; and identify monitoring, irrigation, or other wells requiring proper abandonment in compliance with local, State, and federal laws, policies, and regulations. The ESMP shall include measures for identifying, testing, and managing soil and groundwater suspected of or known to contain hazardous materials. The ESMP shall: 1) provide procedures for evaluating, handling, storing, testing, and disposing of soil and groundwater during project excavation and dewatering activities, respectively; 2) describe required worker health and safety provisions for all workers potentially exposed to hazardous materials in accordance with State and federal worker safety regulations; and 3) designate personnel responsible for implementation of the ESMP. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure HAZ-4b: For those sites with potential residual contamination in soil, gas, or groundwater that are planned for redevelopment with an overlying occupied building, a vapor intrusion assessment shall be performed by a licensed environmental professional. If the results of the vapor intrusion assessment indicate the potential for significant vapor intrusion into an occupied building, project design shall include vapor controls or source removal, as appropriate, in accordance with regulatory agency requirements. Soil vapor mitigations or controls could include passive venting, and/or active venting. The vapor intrusion assessment and associated vapor controls or source removal can be incorporated into the ESMP (Mitigation Measure HAZ-4a). GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-21 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance HAZ-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not, for a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area. N/A N/A NI N/A N/A HAZ-6: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Policies HS-2.1, HS-2.4, HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-7.1, and HS-7.2 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-2.2.1, HS-3.3.1, HS-3.3.3, and HS-3.3.4 Policies HS-2.1, HS-2.4, HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-7.1, and HS- 7.2 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-2.2.1, HS-3.3.1, HS-3.3.3, and HS-3.3.4 LTS N/A N/A HAZ-7: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Policies HS-3.1, HS-3.2, and HS-3.5 Policies HS-3.1, HS-3.2, and HS-3.5 LTS N/A N/A HAZ-8: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to hazards and hazardous materials. Policies HS-2.1, HS-2.4, HS-3.1, HS-3.2,HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, HS-6.1, HS-6.2, HS-6.4, HS-6.5, HS-7.1, and HS- 7.2 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-2.2.1, HS-3.3.1, HS-3.3.3, and HS-3.3.4 Policies HS-2.1, HS-2.4, HS-3.1, HS-3.2,HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, HS-6.1, HS-6.2, HS-6.4, HS-6.5, HS-7.1, and HS- 7.2 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-2.2.1, HS-3.3.1, HS-3.3.3, and HS-3.3.4 LTS Implement General Plan Mitigation Measures HAZ-4a: and HAZ-4b. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-4a and Haz- 4b have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.040(B), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Hazardous Materials and in CMC Section 17.04.050(B), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Hazardous Materials Permit Requirements, therefore, compliance with the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (HYD) HYD-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Policies ES-7.1, ES-7.2, ES-7.3, and ES-7.5 Strategies ES-5.3.1, ES-7.2.2, ES-7.3.2, and ES-7.4.1 Policies ES-5.1, ES-5.2, ES-5.3, ES-7.1, ES-7.2, ES-7.3, ES- 7.4, ES-7.5, ES-7.6, and ES-7.8 Strategies ES-5.1.1, ES-5.1.2, ES-5.2.1, ES-5.3.2, ES- 5.6.1, ES-7.1.1, ES-7.2.1, ES-7.2.2, ES-7.2.3, ES-7.3.1, ES-7.3.2, ES-7.4.1, ES-7.4.2, ES-7.4.3, and ES-7.8.1 LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-22 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance HYD-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. N/A Policies ES-7.5 and ES-7.8 Strategy ES-7.2.3 LTS N/A N/A HYD-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site; ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) Impede or redirect flood flows Policies INF-1.2 and INF-4.1 Strategy INF-1.1.3 Policies INF-1.1, INF-1.2, INF-1.3, INF-1.4, INF-4.1, and INF-4.2 Strategies INF-1.1.1, INF-1.1.2, INF-1.1.3, INF-1.4.1, INF-1.4.2, INF-1.4.3, INF-4.1.1, INF-4.1.2, INF-4.1.3, and INF-4.2.1 LTS N/A N/A HYD-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not, in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation. Policies HS-1.1, HS-1.2, and HS-7.2 Strategies HS-1.1.3, HS-1.2.1, HS-1.2.2, and HS-7.2.2 Policies HS-1.1, HS-1.2, HS-7.1, HS-7.2, HS-7.3, and HS- 7.4 Strategies HS-1.1.1, HS-1.1.2, HS-1.1.3, HS-1.2.1, HS- 1.2.2, HS-7.2.1, HS-7.2.2, HS-7.4.1, HS-7.4.2, HS-7.4.3 LTS N/A N/A HYD-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A HYD-6: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to hydrology and water quality. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-23 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance LAND USE AND PLANNING (LU) LU-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not physically divide an established community. Policies LU-23.1, LU-25.1, LU-25.2, LU-27.1, LU-27.7, M-2.2, M-3.2, HS-8.5, and RPC-2.4 Strategies LU-1.3.2, LU-3.3.8, LU-8.3.3, LU-27.1.1, LU- 27.1.3, M-3.5.1, and M-3.5.2 Policies LU-4.1, LU-13.1, LU-23.1, LU-25.1, LU-25.2, LU- 27.1, LU-27.7, M-2.2, M-3.2, HS-8.5, and RPC-2.4 Strategies LU-1.3.2, LU-3.3.8, LU-8.3.3, LU-27.1.1, LU- 27.1.3, M-3.5.1, and M-3.5.2 LTS N/A N/A LU-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Policies LU-1.6 and ES-1.2 Policies LU-1.6 and ES-1.2 LTS N/A N/A LU-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to land use and planning. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A NOISE (NOI) NOI-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, state, or federal standard. Policies LU-27.8, HS-8.1, HS-8.3, HS-8.4, HS-8.5, HS- 8.6, and HS-8.7 Strategies HS-8.2.2, HS-8.2.3, and HS-8.6.1 Policies LU-27.8, HS-8.1, HS-8.3, HS-8.4, HS-8.5, HS-8.6, and HS-8.7 Strategies HS-8.2.2, HS-8.2.3, and HS-8.6.1 LTS N/A N/A NOI-2: Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? N/A Policies LU-27.8 and HS-8.1 LTS N/A N/A NOI-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not for a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. N/A N/A NI N/A N/A NOI-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to noise. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-24 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance POPULATION AND HOUSING (POP) POP-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth or growth for which inadequate planning has occurred, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure. Policies LU-1.6, LU-5.3, LU-18.2, LU-23.1, LU-25.1, LU- 27.1, LU-27.2, LU-27.6, HE-1.1, HE-1.2, HE-1.3, HE-2.1, HE-2.2, HE-2.3, HE-3.1, HE-3.2, HE-3.3, HE-4.1, HE-6.1, M-2.2, M-2.4, M-9.1, M-9.3, ES-1.2, INF-2.4,and RPC- 2.4 Strategies LU-1.4.2, LU-3.3.8, LU-9.1.3, LU-13.7.3, LU- 27.1.1, LU-27.1.4, LU-27.6.1, HE-1.3.2, ES-1.2.1, INF- 1.1.2, and INF-1.4.2 Policies LU-1.6, LU-5.3, LU-18.2, LU-23.1, LU-25.1, LU- 27.1, LU-27.2, LU-27.6, HE-1.1, HE-1.2, HE-1.3, HE-2.1, HE-2.2, HE-2.3, HE-3.1, HE-3.2, HE-3.3, HE-4.1, HE-6.1, M-2.2, M-2.4, M-9.1, M-9.3, ES-1.2, INF-2.4,and RPC- 2.4 Strategies LU-1.3.2, LU-3.3.8, LU-9.1.3, LU-13.7.3, LU- 27.1.1, LU-27.1.4, LU-27.6.1, HE-1.3.2, ES-1.2.1, INF- 1.1.2, and INF-1.4.2 LTS N/A N/A POP-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A POP-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to population and housing. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION (PS) PS-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection and emergency medical facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Policies HS-3.1, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, HS-3.7, and HS-38 Strategies HS-3.3.3 and HS-3.3.4 Policies HS-3.1, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, HS-3.7, and HS-38 Strategies HS-3.3.3 and HS-3.3.4 LTS N/A N/A PS-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to fire protection services.? Policies HS-3.1, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, HS-3.7, and HS-38 Strategies HS-3.3.3 and HS-3.3.4 Policies HS-3.1, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, HS-3.7, and HS-38 Strategies HS-3.3.3 and HS-3.3.4 LTS N/A N/A PS-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Policies HS-4.1, HS-4.2, and HS-4.2 Strategy 4.2.2 Policies HS-4.1, HS-4.2, and HS-4.2 Strategy 4.2.2 LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-25 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance PS-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to police protection services. Policies HS-4.1, HS-4.2, and HS-4.2 Strategy 4.2.2 Policies HS-4.1, HS-4.2, and HS-4.2 Strategy 4.2.2 LTS N/A N/A PS-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered public school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. Policies HE-7.1, LU-1.6, LU-11.1, and RPC-8.1 Strategies HE-7.3.2, RPC-8.1.1, and RPC-8.1.2 Policies HE-7.1, LU-1.6, LU-11.1, and RPC-8.1 Strategies HE-7.3.2, RPC-8.1.1, and RPC-8.1.2 LTS N/A N/A PS-6: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant cumulatively considerable impact with respect to public school services. Policies HE-7.1, LU-1.6, LU-11.1, and RPC-8.1 Strategies HE-7.3.2, RPC-8.1.1, and RPC-8.1.2 Policies HE-7.1, LU-1.6, LU-11.1, and RPC-8.1 Strategies HE-7.3.2, RPC-8.1.1, and RPC-8.1.2 LTS N/A N/A PS-7: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered public libraries, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. Policies RPC-6.1 and RPC-6.4 Strategy RPC-1.1.2 Policies RPC-6.1 and RPC-6.4 Strategy RPC-1.1.2 LTS N/A N/A PS-8: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to the construction of other public libraries. Policies RPC-6.1 and RPC-6.4 Strategy RPC-1.1.2 Policies RPC-6.1 and RPC-6.4 Strategy RPC-1.1.2 LTS N/A N/A PS-9: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered park facilities or other recreational facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, or other performance objectives. Policies RPC-1.2 and RPC-2.4 Strategy HE-3.3.5 Policies RPC-1.2 and RPC-2.4 Strategy HE-2.3.9 and HE-3.3.5 LTS N/A N/A PS-10: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur, or be accelerated. Policies LU-7.1, RPC-1.1, and RPC-5.1 Strategies RPC-1.1.1, and RPC-2.5.1 Policies LU-7.1, RPC-1.1, and RPC-5.1 Strategies RPC-1.1.1 and RPC-2.5.1 LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-26 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance PS-11: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to parks. Policies LU-7.1, RPC-1.1, RPC-1.2, RPC-2.4, and RPC- 5.1 Strategies HE-3.3.5, RPC-1.1.1, and RPC-2.5.1 Policies LU-7.1, RPC-1.1, RPC-1.2, RPC-2.4, and RPC-5.1 Strategies HE-3.3.5, RPC-1.1.1, and RPC-2.5.1 LTS N/A N/A TRANSPORTATION (TRANS) TRANS-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.1, LU-20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU-24.2, M-1.1, M-1.2, M-1.3, M-1.4, M-3.1, M- 3.6, M-4.4, M-7.1, M-8.1, and M-9.2 Strategies LU-8.3.3, LU-12.5.1, LU-13.7.4, LU-19.2.2, LU-25.4.2, M-5.1.1, M-9.3.2, and ES-2.1.9 Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.1, LU-20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU-24.2, M-1.1, M-1.3, M-3.1, M-3.2, M-3.3, M3- 4, M-3.5, M-3.6, M3.7, M-3.8, M-4.1, M-4.2, M-4.3, M- 4.4, M-4.5, M-4.6, M-4.7, M-4.8, M-5.1, M-7.1, M-8.1, M-8.2, M-9.2, M-10.1, M-10.3, and ES-1.2. Strategies LU-8.3.3, LU-12.5.1, LU-13.7.4, LU-19.2.2, LU-25.4.2, M-5.1.1, M-8.1.1, M-8.1.2, M-8.1.3, M-8.2.1, M-8.2.2, M-8.2.3, M-8.2.4, M-9.3.2, ES-1.2.1, and ES- 2.1.9 LTS General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 was required for impacts related to level of service (LOS), which is no longer a threshold under CEQA. N/A TRANS-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would exceed the adopted Cupertino vehicle miles traveled (VMT) threshold per service population of 31.30 VMT by 3.5 VMT per service population, due to forecasted growth through 2040. N/A Policies M-8.1, M-8.2, and M-8.3 Strategies M-8.1.1, M-8.1.2, M-8.1.3, M-8.2.1, M-8.2.2, M-8.2.3, and M-8.2.4 SU N/A N/A TRANS-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). Policies LU-20.2, LU-21.3, LU-21.4, LU-24.2, M-2.2, M- 3.5, M-3.6, M-7.2, and HS-3.2 Strategies HS-3.3.3 and HS-8.7.2 Policies LU-20.2, LU-21.3, LU-21.4, LU-24.2, M-2.2, M- 3.5, M-3.6, M-7.2, and HS-3.2 Strategies HS-3.3.3 and HS-8.7.2 LTS N/A N/A TRANS-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Policies HS-2.2, HS-2.4, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, and HS-7.1 Strategies HS-3.3.2 and HS-3.3.3 Policies HS-2.2, HS-2.4, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, and HS-7.1 Strategies HS-3.3.2 and HS-3.3.3 LTS N/A N/A TRANS-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would cumulatively contribute to regional vehicle miles traveled. Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.1, LU-20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU-24.2, M-1.1, M-1.2, M-1.3, M-1.4, M-3.1, M- 3.6, M-4.4, M-7.1, M-8.1, M-9.2, HS-2.2, HS-2.4, HS- 3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, and HS-7.1 Policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-13.1, LU-20.2, LU-21.3, LU- 21.4, LU-24.2, M-1.1, M-1.3, M-1.4, M-3.1, M-3.6, M- 4.4, M-4.8, M-7.1, M-8.1, M-8.2, M-9.2, ES-1.2, HS-2.2, HS-2.4, HS-3.2, HS-3.3, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, HS-3.6, and HS- SU GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-27 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance Strategies LU-8.3.3, LU-12.5.1, LU-13.7.4, LU-19.2.2, LU-25.4.2, M-5.1.1, M-9.3.2, HS-3.3.2, HS-3.3.3, HS- 8.7.2, and ES-2.1.9 7.1 Strategies LU-8.3.3, LU-12.5.1, LU-13.7.4, LU-19.2.2, LU-25.4.2, M-5.1.1, M-8.1.1, M-8.1.2, M-8.1.3, M-8.2.1, M-8.2.2, M-8.2.3, M-8.2.4 M-9.3.2, HS-3.3.2, HS-3.3.3, HS-8.7.2, ES-1.2.1, and ES-2.1.9 General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 was required for impacts related to level of service (LOS), which is no longer a threshold under CEQA. N/A UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS (UTIL) UTIL-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would have insufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Policies ES-1.1 and ES-7.9 Strategy ES-7.9.1 Policies ES-1.1, ES-3.1, ES-7.6, ES-7.9, ES-7.10, ES-7.11, INF-1.1, INF-1.2, INF-1.3, INF-1.4, INF-2.5, INF-3.1, and INF-3.2 Strategies ES-1.1.1, ES-1.1.3, ES-3.1.1, ES 3.1.2, ES- 3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-7.8.1, ES-7.9.1, ES-7.10.1, ES-7.10.2, ES-7.11.1, ES-7.11.2, ES-7.11.3, ES-7.11.4, ES-7.11.5, ES-7.11.6, ES-7.11.7, INF-1.1.1, INF-1.1.2, INF-1.1.3, INF-1.4.1, INF-1.4.2, INF-1.4.3, INF-2.5.1, INF-2.5.2, INF- 2.5.3, and INF-3.1.1 LTS N/A N/A UTIL-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not require or result in the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects. Policies ES-1.1 and ES-7.9 Strategy ES-7.9.1 Policies ES-1.1, ES-3.1, ES-7.6, ES-7.9, ES-7.10, ES-7.11, INF-1.1, INF-1.2, INF-1.3, INF-1.4, INF-2.5, INF-3.1, and INF-3.2 Strategies ES-1.1.1, ES-1.1.3, ES-3.1.1, ES 3.1.2, ES- 3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, ES-7.8.1, ES-7.9.1, ES-7.10.1, ES-7.10.2, ES-7.11.1, ES-7.11.2, ES-7.11.3, ES-7.11.4, ES-7.11.5, ES-7.11.6, ES-7.11.7, INF-1.1.1, INF-1.1.2, INF-1.1.3, INF-1.4.1, INF-1.4.2, INF-1.4.3, INF-2.5.1, INF-2.5.2, INF- 2.5.3, and INF-3.1.1 LTS N/A N/A UTIL-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to water services. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A UTIL-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would Policy ES-7.7 Strategy INF-5.1.2 Policies ES-7.7, INF-1.1, INF-1.2, INF-1.3, INF-1.4, INF- 5.1, and INF-5.2 Strategies INF-1.1.1, INF-1.1.2, INF-1.1.3, INF-1.4.1, INF-1.4.2, INF-1.4.3, INF-5.1.1, and INF-5.1.2 LTS GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-28 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance cause significant environmental effects. N/A N/A UTIL-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it does not have adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. Policy ES-7.7 Strategy INF-5.1.2 Policies ES-7.7, INF-1.1, INF-1.2, INF-1.3, INF-1.4, INF- 5.1, and INF-5.2 Strategies INF-1.1.1, INF-1.1.2, INF-1.1.3, INF-1.4.1, INF-1.4.2, INF-1.4.3, INF-5.1.1, and INF-5.1.2 LTS General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure UTIL-6a: The City shall work with the Cupertino Sanitary District to increase the available citywide treatment and transmission capacity to 8.65 million gallons per day, or to a lesser threshold if studies justifying reduced wastewater generation rates are approved by CSD as described in Mitigation Measure UTIL-6c. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure UTIL-6b: The City shall work to establish a system in which a development monitoring and tracking system to tabulate cumulative increases in projected wastewater generation from approved projects for comparison to the Cupertino Sanitary District’s treatment capacity threshold with San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant is prepared and implemented. If it is anticipated that with approval of a development project the actual system discharge would exceed the contractual treatment threshold, no building permits for such project shall be issued prior to increasing the available citywide contractual treatment and transmission capacity as described in Mitigation Measure UTIL-6a. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure UTIL-6c: The City shall work with the Cupertino Sanitary District to prepare a study to determine a more current estimate of the wastewater generation rates that reflect the actual development to be constructed as part of Project implementation. The study could include determining how the green/LEED certified buildings in the City reduce wastewater demands. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure UTIL-6a, UTIL-6b, and UTIL-6c, have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.050(I)(1), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Manage Wastewater Inflow and Infiltration to Sewer System, therefore, compliance the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-29 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance UTIL-6: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to wastewater services. N/A N/A LTS Implement General Plan Mitigation Measure UTIL-6a, UTIL-6b, and UTIL-6c. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure UTIL-6a, UTIL-6b, and UTIL-6c, have been incorporated into CMC Section 17.04.050(I)(1), Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, Manage Wastewater Inflow and Infiltration to Sewer System, therefore, compliance with this section of the CMC is required to mitigate impacts. UTIL-7: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects. Policies ES-7.2 and ES-7.4 Strategy ES-7.2.3 Policies ES-7.1, ES-7.2, ES-7.3, ES-7.4, and ES-7.5 Strategies ES-7.1.1, ES-7.2.1, ES-7.2.2, ES-7.2.3, ES- 7.3.1, ES-7.4.1, ES-7.4.2, ES-7.4.3, and ES-7.8.1 LTS N/A N/A UTIL-8 : Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant cumulative impacts with respect to stormwater. Policies ES-7.2 and ES-7.4 Strategy ES-7.2.3 Policies ES-7.1, ES-7.2, ES-7.3, ES-7.4, and ES-7.5 Strategies ES-7.1.1, ES-7.2.1, ES-7.2.2, ES-7.2.3, ES- 7.3.1, ES-7.4.1, ES-7.4.2, ES-7.4.3, and ES-7.8.1 LTS N/A N/A UTIL-9: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. N/A Policies INF-7.1, INF-7.2, INF-7.3, INF-7.4, and INF-8.1 Strategies INF-7.3.1, INF-8.1.1, INF-8.1.2, INF-8.1.3, INF-8.1.4, INF-8.1.5, INF-8.1.6, and INF-8.1.7 LTS N/A N/A UTIL-10: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. N/A N/A LTS General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures UTIL-8: The City shall continue its current recycling ordinances and zero-waste policies in an effort to further increase its diversion rate and lower its per capita disposal rate. In addition, the City shall monitor solid waste generation volumes in relation to capacities at receiving landfill sites to ensure that sufficient capacity exists to accommodate future growth. The City shall seek new landfill sites to replace the Altamont and Newby Island landfills, at such time that these landfills are closed. N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-30 APRIL 2024 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance UTIL-11: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impact with respect to solid waste. N/A N/A LTS Implement General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure UTIL- 8. N/A UTIL-12: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which would cause significant environmental effects. Policies ES-1.1, ES-2.1, and ES-3.1 Strategies ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES-2.1.4, ES-2.1.7, ES- 2.1.8, and ES-3.1.1 Policies ES-1.1, ES-2.1, ES-3.1, INF-6.1, INF-6.2, and INF- 6.3 Strategies ES-1.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES- 2.1.4, ES-2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES-3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, INF-6.2.1, INF-6.2.2, INF- 6.2.3, INF-6.2.4, INF-6.2.5, and INF-6.3.1 LTS N/A N/A UTIL-13: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not, in combination with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, result in a cumulatively considerable impact to electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities. Policies ES-1.1, ES-2.1, and ES-3.1 Strategies ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES-2.1.4, ES-2.1.7, ES- 2.1.8, and ES-3.1.1 Policies ES-1.1, ES-2.1, ES-3.1, INF-6.1, INF-6.2, and INF- 6.3 Strategies ES-1.1.1, ES-2.1.1, ES-2.1.2, ES-2.1.3, ES- 2.1.4, ES-2.1.6, ES-2.1.7, ES-2.1.8, ES-2.1.10, ES-3.1.1, ES-3.1.2, ES-3.1.3, ES-3.1.4, INF-6.2.1, INF-6.2.2, INF- 6.2.3, INF-6.2.4, INF-6.2.5, and INF-6.3.1 LTS N/A N/A WILDFIRE (FIRE) FIRE-1: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. N/A Policies HS-2.1, HS-2.2, HS-2.4, HS-3.2, HS-3.4, HS-3.5, and HS-3.6 Strategies HS-3.3.2, HS-3.3.3, HS-3.3.4, and HS-3.4.2 LTS N/A N/A FIRE-2: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. N/A Policies HS-1.1, HS-3.1, HS-3.2, HS-3.5, and HS-3.7 Strategies HS-1.1.1 and HS-1.1.2 LTS N/A N/A FIRE-3: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) but would not exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable PLACEWORKS 2-31 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Standard of Significance Question or Impact Statement General Plan 2040 Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Proposed Modified Project Policies and Strategies and Required Mitigation Measures Level of Significance FIRE-4: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. N/A Policies ES-5.3, ES-7.2, ES-7.3, ES-7.5, and HS-7.5 Strategies ES-7.3.1 and ES-7.8.1 LTS N/A N/A FIRE-5: Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to wildfire. N/A N/A LTS N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY N/A = Not Applicable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Less Than Significant with Mitigation; SU = Significant and Unavoidable 2-32 APRIL 2024 This page has been intentionally left blank. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO AIR QUALITY PLACEWORKS 4.2-1 4.2 AIR QUALITY This chapter describes the potential impacts to air quality associated with the adoption and implementation of the proposed Modified Project. This chapter describes the regulatory framework and baseline conditions, identifies criteria used to determine impact significance, provides an analysis of the potential air quality impacts, and identifies General Plan 2040 policies and/or strategies that could minimize any potentially significant impacts. 4.2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AIR POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN Criteria Air Pollutants The pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are categorized as primary and/or secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb) are primary air pollutants. Of these, CO, SO2, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5 are “criteria air pollutants,” which means that Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) have been established for them. VOC and NOX are criteria pollutant precursors that form secondary criteria air pollutants through chemical and photochemical reactions in the atmosphere. Ozone (O3) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are the principal secondary pollutants. Table 4.2-1, Criteria Air Pollutant Health Effects Summary, summarizes the potential health effects associated with the criteria air pollutants. TABLE 4.2-1 CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT HEALTH EFFECTS SUMMARY Pollutant Health Effects Examples of Sources Carbon Monoxide (CO) Chest pain in heart patients, Headaches, nausea, Reduced mental alertness Death at very high levels Any source that burns fuel such as cars, trucks, construction and farming equipment, and residential heaters and stoves Ozone (O3) Cough, chest tightness, Difficulty taking a deep breath, Worsened asthma symptoms Lung inflammation Atmospheric reaction of organic gases with nitrogen oxides in sunlight Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Increased response to allergens, Aggravation of respiratory illness Same as carbon monoxide sources Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) Hospitalizations for worsened heart diseases, Emergency room visits for asthma, Premature death Cars and trucks (particularly diesels), Fireplaces and woodstoves, Windblown dust from overlays, agriculture, and construction Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Aggravation of respiratory disease (e.g., asthma and emphysema) Reduced lung function Combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels, smelting of sulfur-bearing metal ores, and industrial processes Lead (Pb) Behavioral and learning disabilities in children, Nervous system impairment Contaminated soil Source: California Air Resources Board, 2024, Common Air Pollutants: Air Pollution and Health, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/common-air- pollutants, accessed January 29, 2024; South Coast Air Quality Management District, May 6, 2005, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/air-quality-guidance/complete-guidance-document.pdf, accessed January 29, 2024. GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO AIR QUALITY 4.2-2 APRIL 2024 A description of each of the primary and secondary criteria air pollutants and their known health effects is presented below.  Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon substances, such as gasoline or diesel fuel. CO is a primary criteria air pollutant. CO concentrations tend to be the highest during winter mornings with little to no wind, when surface-based inversions trap the pollutant at ground levels. The highest ambient CO concentrations are generally found near traffic-congested corridors and intersections. When inhaled at high concentrations, CO combines with hemoglobin in the blood and reduces its oxygen-carrying capacity. This results in reduced oxygen reaching the brain, heart, and other body tissues. This condition is especially critical for people with cardiovascular diseases, chronic lung disease, or anemia, as well as for fetuses. Even healthy people exposed to high CO concentrations can experience headaches, dizziness, fatigue, unconsciousness, and even death.  Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) are a by-product of fuel combustion and contribute to the formation of ground-level O3, PM10, and PM2.5. The two major forms of NOX are nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). NO is a colorless, odorless gas formed from atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen when combustion takes place under high temperature and/or high pressure. The principal form of NOX produced by combustion is NO, but NO reacts quickly with oxygen to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOX. NO2 is an acute irritant and more injurious than NO in equal concentrations. At atmospheric concentrations, however, NO2 is only potentially irritating. NO is a colorless, odorless gas formed from atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen when combustion takes place under high temperature and/or high pressure. NO2 acts as an acute irritant and in equal concentrations is more injurious than NO. At atmospheric concentrations, however, NO2 is only potentially irritating. There is some indication of a relationship between NO2 and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Some increase in bronchitis in children (2 and 3 years old) has also been observed at concentrations below 0.3 parts per million (ppm).  Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent, irritating gas formed by the combustion of sulfurous fossil fuels. It enters the atmosphere as a result of burning high-sulfur-content fuel oils and coal and chemical processes at plants and refineries. Gasoline and natural gas have very low sulfur content and do not release significant quantities of SO2. When sulfur dioxide forms sulfates (SO4) in the atmosphere, together these pollutants are referred to as sulfur oxides (SOX). Thus, SO2 is both a primary and secondary criteria air pollutant. At sufficiently high concentrations, SO2 may irritate the upper respiratory tract. Current scientific evidence links short-term exposures to SO2, ranging from 5 minutes to 24 hours, with an array of adverse respiratory effects, including bronchoconstriction and increased asthma symptoms. These effects are particularly adverse for asthmatics at elevated ventilation rates (e.g., while exercising or playing) at lower concentrations and when combined with particulates, SO2 may do greater harm by injuring lung tissue.  Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) consists of finely divided solids or liquids such as soot, dust, aerosols, fumes, and mists. In the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB or Air Basin), most particulate matter is caused by combustion, factories, construction, grading, GENERAL PLAN 2040 AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO AIR QUALITY PLACEWORKS 4.2-3 demolition, agricultural activities, and motor vehicles. Two forms of fine particulates are now recognized and regulated. Inhalable coarse particles, or PM10, include particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns (i.e., 10 millionths of a meter or 0.0004 inch) or less. Inhalable fine particles, or PM2.5, have an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns or less (i.e., 2.5 millionths of a meter or 0.0001 inch). Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is also classified as a carcinogen. Extended exposure to particulate matter can increase the risk of chronic respiratory disease. PM10 bypasses the body’s natural filtration system more easily than larger particles and can lodge deep in the lungs. The EPA scientific review concluded that PM2.5 penetrates even more deeply into the lungs, and this is more likely to contribute to health effects—at concentrations well below current PM10 standards. These health effects include premature death in people with heart or lung disease, nonfatal heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, aggravated asthma, decreased lung function, and increased respiratory symptoms (e.g., irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing). Motor vehicles are currently responsible for about half of particulates in the SFBAAB. Wood burning in fireplaces and stoves is another large source of fine particulates.  Ozone (O3) is a key ingredient of “smog” and is a gas that is formed when ROGs and NOX, both by- products of internal combustion engine exhaust, undergo photochemical reactions in sunlight. O3 is a secondary criteria air pollutant. O3 concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light winds, and warm temperatures create favorable conditions for its formation. O3 poses a health threat to those who already suffer from respiratory diseases as well as to healthy people. Breathing O3 can trigger a variety of health problems, including chest pain, coughing, throat irritation, and congestion. It can worsen bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma; reduce lung function; and inflame the linings of the lungs. Besides causing shortness of breath, it can aggravate existing respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. Chronic exposure to high ozone levels can permanently damage lung tissue. O3 can also damage plants and trees and materials such as rubber and fabrics.  Reactive Organic Gases (ROGs)/Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are compounds composed primarily of hydrogen and carbon atoms. Internal combustion associated with motor vehicle usage is the major source of ROGs. Other sources of ROGs include evaporative emissions from paints and solvents, the application of asphalt paving, and the use of household consumer products such as aerosols. Adverse effects on human health are not caused directly by ROGs, but rather by reactions of ROGs to form secondary pollutants such as O3. There are no AAQS established for ROGs. However, because they contribute to the formation of O3, the BAAQMD has established a significance threshold for this pollutant.  Lead (Pb) is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as in manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been mobile and industrial sources. As a result of the phasing out of leaded gasoline, metal processing is currently the primary source of lead emissions. The highest levels of lead in the air are generally found near lead smelters. Other stationary sources are waste incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid battery manufacturers. Because ........................................................................................................................ A PPENDIX B : A IR Q UALITY AND G REENHOUSE G AS E MISSIONS D ATA ........................................................................................................................ Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Appendix              Assumptions Worksheet             Name:Cupertino Housing Element and Safety Element Update Project Number: COCU-26 Project Location:City of Cupertino County:Santa Clara County Climate Zone:4 Land Use Setting:Urban Operational Year:2031 Utility Company:PG&E, Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) Air Basin:San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) Air District:Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Project Components Units1 Acres1 Population2 Apartments Low-Rise 317 8.58 932 Apartments Mid-Rise 2,773 46.91 8,153 Condo/Townhouse 218 9.36 641 Single Family Housing3 9 1.34 27 Total 3,317 66.19 9,753 Notes 1 Based on data from Tables 3-4 and 3-5 from Chapter 3, Project Description. 2 Proposed population is the net new dwelling units x 2.94 persons per household 3 CalEEMod Land Use Inputs Land Use Type Land Use Subtype Unit Amount Size Metric Acres Land Use Square Feet Population Residential Apartments Low-Rise 317 Dwelling Unit 8.580 336,020 932 Residential Apartments Mid-Rise 2,773 Dwelling Unit 46.910 2,662,080 8,153 Residential Condo/Townhouse 218 Dwelling Unit 9.360 231,080 641 Residential Single Family Housing 9 Dwelling Unit 1.340 17,550 27 Net Trips Weekday Average Daily Trips Weekday Daily VMT Cumulative Conditions (Baseline)425,290 4,389,760 Cumulative Conditions with Project Conditions (Proposed Project)451,170 4,561,890 Net New Trips 25,880 172,130 Land Use Type CalEEMod Weekday Trip Rate CalEEMod Saturday Trip Rate CalEEMod Sunday Trip Rate Apartments Low-Rise 7.32 8.14 6.28 Apartments Mid-Rise 5.44 4.91 4.09 Townhomes 7.32 8.14 6.28 Single Family Homes 9.44 9.54 8.55 Land Use Type Weekday Trips Weekday Trip Rate 1 Saturday Trips Saturday Trip Rate 2 Sunday Trips Sunday Trip Rate 2 Average Trip Rate Apartments Low-Rise 2,473 7.802230932 2,750 8.676251499 2,122 6.693717314 7.7687 Apartments Mid-Rise 21,636 7.802230932 19,528 7.042086816 16,266 5.866015692 7.4170 Townhomes 1,701 7.802230932 1,891 8.676251499 1,459 6.693717314 7.7687 Single Family Homes 70 7.802230932 71 7.884882002 64 7.066639716 7.7090 25,880 24,240 19,911 Notes: 1 Based on net new trip data from transportation analysis multiplied by the percentage of each residential land use type. 2 Saturday and Sunday trip rates extrapolated from CalEEMod default weekday and weekend trip rates. Sources: Fehr & Peers. 2024, January. Cupertino General Plan and Zoning Updates: Transportation Analysis for the Environmental Review. Land Use Type Weekday Total Miles Traveled Weekday Miles/Trip Saturday Total Miles Traveled Saturday Miles/Trip Sunday Total Miles Traveled Sunday Miles/Trip Apartments Low-Rise 16,450 6.651081917 18,293 6.651081917 14,113 6.651081917 Apartments Mid-Rise 143,900 6.651081917 129,880 6.651081917 108,190 6.651081917 Townhomes 11,313 6.651081917 12,580 6.651081917 9,705 6.651081917 Single Family Homes 467 6.651081917 472 6.651081917 423 6.651081917 172,130 161,225 132,431 Total VMT 60,196,060 Land Use Res H-W Trip %Res H-S Trip %Res H-O Trip % Apartments Low-Rise 29%17%54% Apartments Mid-Rise 29%17%54% Townhomes 29%17%54% Single Family Homes 29%17%54% Adjusted Trip Type Percentages (For All Land Uses)100% 0% 0% Fireplaces (CalEEMod Default) No wood-burning stoves or fireplaces anticipated in new development, consistent with BAAQMD District Regulation 6, Rule 3: Wood-Burning Devices. Land Use # Wood # Gas # Propane # without Fireplace Hours/Day Days/Year Wood Mass (lb/year) Apartments Low-Rise 0 161.7 0 155 3.5 9.00 0 Apartments Mid-Rise 0 1,414.2 0 1,359 3.5 9.00 0 Townhomes 0 111.2 0 107 3.5 9.00 0 Single Family Homes 0 1.8 0 7 3.0 9.00 0 Trip Type Percentages CalEEMod Inputs - Cupertino Housing Element and Safety Element Update, Operation For consistency with the 3,317 homes analyzed in the transportation analysis, additional units have been added to the single family homes category. Water Use and Wastewater Generation (CalEEMod Defaults) Land Use Indoor Outdoor Total Apartments Low-Rise 11,496,449 0 11,496,449 Apartments Mid-Rise 100,566,727 0 100,566,727 Townhomes 7,906,075 0 7,906,075 Single Family Homes 326,398 1,377,374 1,703,771 Total 120,295,649 1,377,374 121,673,023 Solid Waste (CalEEMod Defaults) Land Use Total Solid Waste (tons/resident/yr)3 Total Solid Waste (tons/yr) Apartments Low-Rise 0.25 230.50 Apartments Mid-Rise 0.25 2,016.34 Condo/Townhouse 0.25 158.53 Single Family Housing 0.26 7.05 CalEEMod Energy Use Land Use Subtype Total Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh/year) Total Annual Natural Gas Consumption (kBTU/year) Title-24 Electricity Energy Intensity (kWhr/size/year)* Title-24 Natural Gas Energy Intensity (KBTU/size/year)* Nontitle-24 Electricity Energy Intensity (kWhr/size/year) Nontitle-24 Natural Gas Energy Intensity (KBTU/size/year) Apartments Low-Rise 1,188,904.61 6,327,100.54 244,198.70 5,944,215.26 944,705.91 382,885.28 Apartments Mid-Rise 9,459,953.20 24,413,689.13 2,323,627.43 22,688,205.97 7,136,325.77 1,725,483.16 Condo/Townhouse 931,838.79 6,370,960.36 160,764.40 6,016,868.81 771,074.39 354,091.55 Single Family Housing 55,663.71 415,997.30 8,057.83 391,758.70 47,605.88 24,238.60 Total 11,636,360.31 37,527,747.33 Architectural Coating Percent Painted Interior Painted:100% Exterior Painted:100% CalEEMod Default Interior Paint VOC content:100 grams per liter Exterior Paing VOC content:100 grams per liter Structures Land Use Square Feet CalEEMod Factor2 Total Paintable Surface Area Paintable Interior Area1 Paintable Exterior Area1 Residential Structures 0 3,246,730 2.7 8,766,171 6,574,628 2,191,543 8,766,171 6,574,628 2,191,543 Pacific Gas and Electric Carbon Intensity Factors Forecasted Year 2031 CO2:1,2 203.98 pounds per megawatt hour CH4:3 0.033 pound per megawatt hour N2O:3 0.004 pound per megawatt hour 1CalEEMod methodology calculates the paintable interior and exterior areas by multiplying the total paintable surface area by 75 and 25 percent, respectively. 2 The program assumes the total surface for painting equals 2.7 times the floor square footage for residential and 2 times that for nonresidential square footage defined by the user. Changes to the CalEEMod Defaults - Fleet Mix 2031 Trips 25,880 Default HHD LDA LDT1 LDT2 LHD1 LHD2 MCY MDV MH MHD OBUS SBUS UBUS FleetMix (Model Default Percentage 0.792551041 51.2655735 3.467168659 24.09308106 2.450372092 0.624942593 2.191876434 13.70431185 0.223160908 0.973518193 0.106175896 0.067909597 0.039357701 100.00 FleetMix (Converted)0.00792551 0.512655735 0.034671687 0.240930811 0.024503721 0.006249426 0.021918764 0.137043118 0.002231609 0.009735182 0.001061759 0.000679096 0.000393577 100% Trips 205 13,268 897 6,235 634 162 567 3,547 58 252 27 18 10 25,880 Percent 81%5%14%100% without buses/MH 0.007926 0.512656 0.034672 0.240931 0.024504 0.006249 0.021919 0.137043 0.002232 0.009735 0.001062 0.000679 0.000394 100% Percent 81%5%14%100% Adjusted without buses/MH 0.007926 0.512656 0.034672 0.240931 0.024504 0.006249 0.021919 0.137043 0.002232 0.009735 0.001062 0.000679 0.000394 Percent adjusted 81%5%14%100% Assumed Mix 97.0%1.00%2.00%100% Adjusted with Assumed Mix Percentage 0.001502 0.613787 0.041511 0.288459 0.004643 0.001184 0.026243 0.020000 0.000423 0.001844 0.000201 0.000129 0.000075 100% Adjusted CalEEMod Input 0.150162 61.378694 4.151134 28.845905 0.464263 0.118405 2.624266 2.000000 0.042281 0.184449 0.020117 0.012867 0.007457 Percent Check:97%1%2% Trips 39 15,885 1,074 7,465 120 31 679 518 11 48 5 3 2 25,880 25,104 1,417 518 Fleet mix for the project is modified to reflect a higher proportion of passenger vehicles that the regional VMT. Assumes a mix of approximately 97% passenger vehicles, 2% medium duty trucks, and 1% heavy duty trucks and buses.             Emissions Worksheet             Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Summary - Operations, 2025 Cupertino Housing Element Update Mitigated Operational TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T Category tons/yr Mobile 58 54 26 389 1 0 103 104 0 26 27 Area 2 16 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Energy 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 60 71 28 407 1 1 103 104 1 26 27 BAAQMD Threshold (T/YR)NA 10 10 NA NA NA NA 15 NA NA 10 Exceeds thresholds Yes Yes Yes Yes Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Summary - Operations, 2025 Annual emissions divided by 365 days/year to obtain average daily emissions. Cupertino Housing Element Update TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T lbs/day Mobile 298 143 2132 5 2 564 570 2 143 145 Area 90 2 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Energy 1 9 4 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Total 389 154 570 146 BAAQMD Threshold (Daily)54 54 82 82 Exceeds Threshold Yes Yes Yes Yes GHG Emissions Inventory Proposed Project Buildout Operations1 MTCO2e/Year2 Operations % Mobile 78,838 96% Area 210 0% Energy3 3,068 4% Water 73 0% Solid Waste 0 0% Refrigerants 0 0% 82,189 100% Notes 1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.1 2 MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. CalEEMod Outputs 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Data Field Value Project Name Cupertino Housing Element Update Operational Year 2031 Lead Agency Land Use Scale Plan/community Analysis Level for Defaults County Windspeed (m/s)2.7 Precipitation (days)25.6 Location Cupertino, CA, USA County Santa Clara City Cupertino Air District Bay Area AQMD Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area TAZ 1708 EDFZ 1 Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric App Version 2022.1.1.21 1.2. Land Use Types Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq ft)Special Landscape Area (sq ft)Population Description Apartments Low Rise 317 Dwelling Unit 8.58 336020 0 932 Apartments Mid Rise 2773 Dwelling Unit 46.9 2662080 0 8153 Condo/Townhouse 218 Dwelling Unit 9.36 231080 0 641 Single Family Housing 9 Dwelling Unit 1.34 17550 105416 27 1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector #Measure Title 2. Emissions Summary 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Unmit.92.9 167 70.8 698 1.34 3.97 122 126 3.91 31 34.9 1531 168694 170225 161 4.14 245 175735 Daily, Winter (Max) Unmit.73.7 149 75 487 1.26 3.88 122 126 3.85 31 34.8 1531 160613 162143 162 4.62 29 167598 Average Daily (Max) Unmit.73.4 150 39.7 524 1.01 1.32 113 115 1.27 28.6 29.9 1531 115466 116997 161 4.13 113 122357 Annual (Max) Unmit.13.4 27.4 7.25 95.7 0.18 0.24 20.7 20.9 0.23 5.23 5.46 253 19117 19370 26.6 0.68 18.8 20258 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Mobile 70.8 66.6 26.9 491 1.06 0.47 122 123 0.44 31 31.4 107740 107740 4.7 3.34 222 109073 Area 21 100 34.4 203 0.22 2.73 2.73 2.71 2.71 0 41985 41985 0.8 0.08 42029 Energy 1.11 0.55 9.48 4.03 0.06 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 18530 18530 2.12 0.15 18628 Water 231 439 670 23.7 0.57 1432 Waste 1300 0 1300 130 0 4549 Refrig.23.3 23.3 Total 92.9 167 70.8 698 1.34 3.97 122 126 3.91 31 34.9 1531 168694 170225 161 4.14 245 175735 Daily, Winter (Max) Mobile 68.8 64.3 32.8 469 0.99 0.47 122 123 0.44 31 31.4 100162 100162 5.41 3.82 5.74 101442 Area 3.82 83.9 32.7 13.9 0.21 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 0 41481 41481 0.78 0.08 41524 Energy 1.11 0.55 9.48 4.03 0.06 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 18530 18530 2.12 0.15 18628 Water 231 439 670 23.7 0.57 1432 Waste 1300 0 1300 130 0 4549 Refrig.23.3 23.3 Total 73.7 149 75 487 1.26 3.88 122 126 3.85 31 34.8 1531 160613 162143 162 4.62 29 167598 Average Daily Mobile 63.7 59.6 28.6 427 0.94 0.44 113 114 0.41 28.6 29.1 95226 95226 4.8 3.41 90 96452 Area 8.57 90.1 1.67 93.5 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.1 0.1 0 1271 1271 0.03 < 0.005 1273 Energy 1.11 0.55 9.48 4.03 0.06 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 18530 18530 2.12 0.15 18628 Water 231 439 670 23.7 0.57 1432 Waste 1300 0 1300 130 0 4549 Refrig.23.3 23.3 Total 73.4 150 39.7 524 1.01 1.32 113 115 1.27 28.6 29.9 1531 115466 116997 161 4.13 113 122357 Annual Mobile 11.6 10.9 5.22 77.9 0.17 0.08 20.7 20.8 0.08 5.23 5.3 15766 15766 0.79 0.56 14.9 15969 Area 1.56 16.4 0.3 17.1 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 210 210 < 0.005 < 0.005 211 Energy 0.2 0.1 1.73 0.74 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 3068 3068 0.35 0.02 3084 Water 38.2 72.7 111 3.93 0.09 237 Waste 215 0 215 21.5 0 753 Refrig.3.85 3.85 Total 13.4 27.4 7.25 95.7 0.18 0.24 20.7 20.9 0.23 5.23 5.46 253 19117 19370 26.6 0.68 18.8 20258 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Low Rise 7.39 6.95 2.8 51.3 0.11 0.05 12.8 12.8 0.05 3.23 3.28 11246 11246 0.49 0.35 23.1 11386 Apartments Mid Rise 58.2 54.7 22.1 403 0.87 0.39 101 101 0.36 25.4 25.8 88469 88469 3.86 2.74 182 89564 Condo/Townhouse 5.09 4.78 1.93 35.3 0.08 0.03 8.79 8.83 0.03 2.22 2.25 7734 7734 0.34 0.24 15.9 7830 Single Family Housing 0.19 0.18 0.07 1.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33 0.33 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 290 290 0.01 0.01 0.6 294 Total 70.8 66.6 26.9 491 1.06 0.47 122 123 0.44 31 31.4 107740 107740 4.7 3.34 222 109073 Daily, Winter (Max) Apartments Low Rise 7.18 6.71 3.43 48.9 0.1 0.05 12.8 12.8 0.05 3.23 3.28 10455 10455 0.56 0.4 0.6 10589 Apartments Mid Rise 56.5 52.8 27 385 0.81 0.39 101 101 0.36 25.4 25.8 82247 82247 4.44 3.14 4.72 83297 Condo/Townhouse 4.94 4.62 2.36 33.7 0.07 0.03 8.79 8.83 0.03 2.22 2.25 7190 7190 0.39 0.27 0.41 7282 Single Family Housing 0.19 0.17 0.09 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33 0.33 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 270 270 0.01 0.01 0.02 273 Total 68.8 64.3 32.8 469 0.99 0.47 122 123 0.44 31 31.4 100162 100162 5.41 3.82 5.74 101442 Annual Apartments Low Rise 1.16 1.08 0.52 7.73 0.02 0.01 2.05 2.06 0.01 0.52 0.53 1566 1566 0.08 0.06 1.48 1586 Apartments Mid Rise 9.65 9.03 4.33 64.6 0.14 0.07 17.2 17.2 0.06 4.34 4.4 13079 13079 0.66 0.47 12.4 13247 Condo/Townhouse 0.79 0.74 0.36 5.32 0.01 0.01 1.41 1.42 0.01 0.36 0.36 1077 1077 0.05 0.04 1.02 1091 Single Family Housing 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 44.1 44.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 44.7 Total 11.6 10.9 5.22 77.9 0.17 0.08 20.7 20.8 0.08 5.23 5.3 15766 15766 0.79 0.56 14.9 15969 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Low Rise 664 664 0.11 0.01 671 Apartments Mid Rise 5287 5287 0.86 0.1 5339 Condo/Townhouse 521 521 0.08 0.01 526 Single Family Housing 31.1 31.1 0.01 < 0.005 31.4 Total 6503 6503 1.05 0.13 6567 Daily, Winter (Max) Apartments Low Rise 664 664 0.11 0.01 671 Apartments Mid Rise 5287 5287 0.86 0.1 5339 Condo/Townhouse 521 521 0.08 0.01 526 Single Family Housing 31.1 31.1 0.01 < 0.005 31.4 Total 6503 6503 1.05 0.13 6567 Annual Apartments Low Rise 110 110 0.02 < 0.005 111 Apartments Mid Rise 875 875 0.14 0.02 884 Condo/Townhouse 86.2 86.2 0.01 < 0.005 87.1 Single Family Housing 5.15 5.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.2 Total 1077 1077 0.17 0.02 1087 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Low Rise 0.19 0.09 1.6 0.68 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 2028 2028 0.18 < 0.005 2033 Apartments Mid Rise 0.72 0.36 6.16 2.62 0.04 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7824 7824 0.69 0.01 7846 Condo/Townhouse 0.19 0.09 1.61 0.68 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 2042 2042 0.18 < 0.005 2047 Single Family Housing 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 133 133 0.01 < 0.005 134 Total 1.11 0.55 9.48 4.03 0.06 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 12027 12027 1.06 0.02 12060 Daily, Winter (Max) Apartments Low Rise 0.19 0.09 1.6 0.68 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 2028 2028 0.18 < 0.005 2033 Apartments Mid Rise 0.72 0.36 6.16 2.62 0.04 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7824 7824 0.69 0.01 7846 Condo/Townhouse 0.19 0.09 1.61 0.68 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 2042 2042 0.18 < 0.005 2047 Single Family Housing 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 133 133 0.01 < 0.005 134 Total 1.11 0.55 9.48 4.03 0.06 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 12027 12027 1.06 0.02 12060 Annual Apartments Low Rise 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.12 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 336 336 0.03 < 0.005 337 Apartments Mid Rise 0.13 0.07 1.12 0.48 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 1295 1295 0.11 < 0.005 1299 Condo/Townhouse 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.12 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 338 338 0.03 < 0.005 339 Single Family Housing < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.1 Total 0.2 0.1 1.73 0.74 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 1991 1991 0.18 < 0.005 1997 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.1. Unmitigated Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Hearths 3.82 1.91 32.7 13.9 0.21 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 0 41481 41481 0.78 0.08 41524 Consumer Products 69.5 Architectural Coatings 12.5 Landscape Equipment 17.2 16.3 1.75 189 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 503 503 0.02 < 0.005 505 Total 21 100 34.4 203 0.22 2.73 2.73 2.71 2.71 0 41985 41985 0.8 0.08 42029 Daily, Winter (Max) Hearths 3.82 1.91 32.7 13.9 0.21 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 0 41481 41481 0.78 0.08 41524 Consumer Products 69.5 Architectural Coatings 12.5 Total 3.82 83.9 32.7 13.9 0.21 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 0 41481 41481 0.78 0.08 41524 Annual Hearths 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 169 169 < 0.005 < 0.005 170 Consumer Products 12.7 Architectural Coatings 2.29 Landscape Equipment 1.55 1.46 0.16 17 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 41.1 41.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 41.2 Total 1.56 16.4 0.3 17.1 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 210 210 < 0.005 < 0.005 211 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.1. Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Low Rise 22 41.6 63.6 2.27 0.05 137 Apartments Mid Rise 193 364 557 19.8 0.48 1194 Condo/Townhouse 15.1 28.6 43.8 1.56 0.04 93.9 Single Family Housing 0.63 4.98 5.6 0.06 < 0.005 7.71 Total 231 439 670 23.7 0.57 1432 Daily, Winter (Max) Apartments Low Rise 22 41.6 63.6 2.27 0.05 137 Apartments Mid Rise 193 364 557 19.8 0.48 1194 Condo/Townhouse 15.1 28.6 43.8 1.56 0.04 93.9 Single Family Housing 0.63 4.98 5.6 0.06 < 0.005 7.71 Total 231 439 670 23.7 0.57 1432 Annual Apartments Low Rise 3.65 6.89 10.5 0.38 0.01 22.6 Apartments Mid Rise 31.9 60.3 92.2 3.28 0.08 198 Condo/Townhouse 2.51 4.74 7.25 0.26 0.01 15.5 Single Family Housing 0.1 0.82 0.93 0.01 < 0.005 1.28 Total 38.2 72.7 111 3.93 0.09 237 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.1. Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Low Rise 124 0 124 12.4 0 435 Apartments Mid Rise 1087 0 1087 109 0 3802 Condo/Townhouse 85.4 0 85.4 8.54 0 299 Single Family Housing 3.8 0 3.8 0.38 0 13.3 Total 1300 0 1300 130 0 4549 Daily, Winter (Max) Apartments Low Rise 124 0 124 12.4 0 435 Apartments Mid Rise 1087 0 1087 109 0 3802 Condo/Townhouse 85.4 0 85.4 8.54 0 299 Single Family Housing 3.8 0 3.8 0.38 0 13.3 Total 1300 0 1300 130 0 4549 Annual Apartments Low Rise 20.6 0 20.6 2.06 0 72 Apartments Mid Rise 180 0 180 18 0 629 Condo/Townhouse 14.1 0 14.1 1.41 0 49.5 Single Family Housing 0.63 0 0.63 0.06 0 2.2 Total 215 0 215 21.5 0 753 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Apartments Low Rise 2.41 2.41 Apartments Mid Rise 19.1 19.1 Condo/Townhouse 1.65 1.65 Single Family Housing 0.13 0.13 Total 23.3 23.3 Daily, Winter (Max) Apartments Low Rise 2.41 2.41 Apartments Mid Rise 19.1 19.1 Condo/Townhouse 1.65 1.65 Single Family Housing 0.13 0.13 Total 23.3 23.3 Annual Apartments Low Rise 0.4 0.4 Apartments Mid Rise 3.16 3.16 Condo/Townhouse 0.27 0.27 Single Family Housing 0.02 0.02 Total 3.85 3.85 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Total Daily, Winter (Max) Total Annual Total 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Total Daily, Winter (Max) Total Annual Total 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Total Daily, Winter (Max) Total Annual Total 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Vegetation TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Total Daily, Winter (Max) Total Annual Total 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Total Daily, Winter (Max) Total Annual Total 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO₂PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO₂NBCO₂CO₂T CH₄N₂O R CO₂e Daily, Summer (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal Annual Avoided Subtotal Sequestered Subtotal Removed Subtotal 5. Activity Data 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low Rise 2,473 2,750 2,122 898,881 16,450 18,293 14,113 5,978,532 5,978,562 Apartments Mid Rise 21,636 19,528 16,266 7,507,117 143,900 129,880 108,190 49,930,448 49,937,540 Condo/Townhouse 1,701 1,891 1,459 618,158 11,313 12,580 9,705 4,111,419 4,111,513 Single Family Housing 70 71 64 25,324 467 472 423 168,431 168,427 60,188,830 60,196,042 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated Hearth Type Unmitigated (number) Apartments Low Rise Wood Fireplaces 0 Gas Fireplaces 162 Propane Fireplaces 0 Electric Fireplaces 0 No Fireplaces 155 Conventional Wood Stoves 0 Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Pellet Wood Stoves 0 Apartments Mid Rise Wood Fireplaces 0 Gas Fireplaces 1414 Propane Fireplaces 0 Electric Fireplaces 0 No Fireplaces 1359 Conventional Wood Stoves 0 Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Pellet Wood Stoves 0 Condo/Townhouse Wood Fireplaces 0 Gas Fireplaces 111 Propane Fireplaces 0 Electric Fireplaces 0 No Fireplaces 107 Conventional Wood Stoves 0 Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Pellet Wood Stoves 0 Single Family Housing Wood Fireplaces 0 Gas Fireplaces 2 Propane Fireplaces 0 Electric Fireplaces 0 No Fireplaces 7 Conventional Wood Stoves 0 Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 Pellet Wood Stoves 0 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Parking Area Coated (sq ft) 6574628 2191543 0 0 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Season Unit Value Snow Days day/yr 0 Summer Days day/yr 180 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 1188905 204 0.033 0.004 6327101 Apartments Mid Rise 9459953 204 0.033 0.004 24413689 Condo/Townhouse 931839 204 0.033 0.004 6370960 Single Family Housing 55664 204 0.033 0.004 415997 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 11496449 0 Apartments Mid Rise 100566727 0 Condo/Townhouse 7906075 0 Single Family Housing 326398 1377374 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year) Apartments Low Rise 230 Apartments Mid Rise 2016 Condo/Townhouse 159 Single Family Housing 7.05 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak RateService Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C & Other residential A/C and heat pumps R-410A 2088 < 0.005 2.5 2.5 10 Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators and/or freezers R-134a 1430 0.12 0.6 0 1 Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C & Other residential A/C and heat pumps R-410A 2088 < 0.005 2.5 2.5 10 Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators and/or freezers R-134a 1430 0.12 0.6 0 1 Condo/Townhouse Average room A/C & Other residential A/C and heat pumps R-410A 2088 < 0.005 2.5 2.5 10 Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators and/or freezers R-134a 1430 0.12 0.6 0 1 Single Family Housing Average room A/C & Other residential A/C and heat pumps R-410A 2088 < 0.005 2.5 2.5 10 Single Family Housing Household refrigerators and/or freezers R-134a 1430 0.12 0.6 0 1 5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor 5.16.2. Process Boilers Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity ScoreVulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A Extreme Precipitation 1 1 1 2 Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 8. User Changes to Default Data Screen Justification Land Use based on data from Tables 3-4 and 3-5 from Chapter 3, Project Description. Proposed population is the net new dwelling units x 2.94 persons per household. Operations: Fleet Mix Fleet mix for the project is modified to reflect a higher proportion of passenger vehicles that the regional VMT. Assumes a mix of approximately 97% passenger vehicles, 2% medium duty trucks, and 1% heavy duty trucks and buses. Operations: Vehicle Data based on data provided by F&P Energy Calculations Operation-Related Vehicle Fuel/Energy Usage VMT Gallons VMT Gallons VMT Gallons VMT kWh Proposed Passenger Vehicles 54,030,711 1,723,451 435,463 35,719 6,803 981 5,723,083 2,110,930 Total 54,030,711 1,723,451 435,463 35,719 6,803 981 5,723,083 2,110,930 Electricity PROJECT LAND USE COMMUTE Vehicle Type Gas Diesel CNG Land Use Vehicle type Fleet percent VMT All Vehicles All Vehicles Total HHD 0.15% 90,391 90,391 LDA 61.38% 36,947,556 36,947,556 LDT1 4.15% 2,498,819 2,498,819 LDT2 28.85% 17,364,098 17,364,098 LHD1 0.46% 279,468 279,468 LHD2 0.12% 71,275 71,275 MCY 2.62% 1,579,705 1,579,705 MDV 2.00% 1,203,921 1,203,921 MH 0.04% 25,452 25,452 MHD 0.18% 111,031 111,031 OBUS 0.02% 12,109 12,109 SBUS 0.01% 7,745 7,745 UBUS 0.01% 4,489 4,489 100.00% 60,196,060 60,196,060 Vehicle type Gas percent Diesel percent CNG percent Electricity percent LDA 86.13% 0.10% 0.00% 13.77% LDT1 97.95% 0.00% 0.00% 2.05% LDT2 96.93% 0.36% 0.00% 2.72% MDV 94.73% 1.22% 0.00% 4.04% LHD1 55.47% 32.78% 0.00% 11.75% LHD2 26.63% 61.94% 0.00% 11.44% MHD 12.35% 73.95% 1.08% 12.62% << Equal to T6 (https://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/downloads/emfac2014/emfac2014-vol3-technical-documentation-052015.pdf) HHD 0.02% 88.91% 5.11% 5.96% << Equal to T7 (https://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/downloads/emfac2014/emfac2014-vol3-technical-documentation-052015.pdf) OBUS 17.35% 78.74% 1.01% 2.90% << Motor coach, all other buses, and OBUS (https://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/downloads/emfac2014/emfac2014-vol3-technical-documentation-052015.pdf) UBUS 8.18% 51.35% 14.86% 25.62% MCY 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% SBUS 36.71% 53.75% 2.61% 6.94% MH 66.05% 33.95% 0.00% 0.00% VMT mpg Gallons VMT mpg Gallons VMT mpg Gallons VMT m/kWh kWh LDA 31,822,548 34.28 928,314 35,801 48.12 744 0 0.00 0 5,089,206 2.68 1,898,039 LDT1 2,447,604 28.53 85,794 18 29.73 1 0 0.00 0 51,197 2.76 18,525 LDT2 16,830,490 28.07 599,613 62,029 37.50 1,654 0 0.00 0 471,579 2.83 166,833 MDV 1,140,521 23.23 49,106 14,736 27.90 528 0 0.00 0 48,663 2.76 17,655 LHD1 155,016 10.64 14,568 91,607 16.41 5,584 0 0.00 0 32,845 1.53 0 LHD2 18,977 9.39 2,021 44,146 13.89 3,177 0 0.00 0 8,152 1.55 0 MHD 13,713 5.12 2,676 82,112 8.78 9,357 1,194 7.27 0 14,012 0.00 0 HHD 14 4.48 3 80,369 6.61 12,164 4,618 5.30 871 5,390 0.55 9,878 OBUS 2,101 5.15 408 9,535 8.74 1,091 122 8.31 0 351 0.00 0 UBUS 367 10.10 36 2,305 8.80 0 667 6.05 110 1,150 0.57 0 MCY 1,579,705 42.89 36,832 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 SBUS 2,843 10.20 279 4,163 8.38 497 202 5.65 0 537 0.95 0 MH 16,811 4.42 3,802 8,641 9.36 923 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 54,030,711 1,723,451 435,463 35,719 6,803 981 5,723,083 2,110,930 Electricity Operational Land Use PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS Vehicle type Gasoline Diesel CNG VMT/day Gallons/day Miles/gallon VMT/day Gallons/day Miles/gallon VMT/day Gallons/day Miles/gallon VMT/day kWh/day Miles/kWh All other buses 0 0 0.00 52,310 5,558 9.41 826 99 8.31 0 0 0.00 LDA 22,458,335 655,145 34.28 25,266 525 48.12 0 0 0.00 3,591,639 1,339,516 2.68 LDT1 1,496,573 52,458 28.53 11 0 29.73 0 0 0.00 31,304 11,327 2.76 LDT2 11,191,983 398,732 28.07 41,248 1,100 37.50 0 0 0.00 313,592 110,941 2.83 LHD1 719,038 67,574 10.64 424,916 25,900 16.41 0 0 0.00 152,349 99,806 1.53 LHD2 85,545 9,110 9.39 199,001 14,323 13.89 0 0 0.00 36,746 23,702 1.55 MCY 170,934 3,985 42.89 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 MDV 6,091,481 262,272 23.23 78,706 2,821 27.90 0 0 0.00 259,910 94,292 2.76 MH 19,813 4,480 4.42 10,184 1,088 9.36 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 Motor coach 0 0 0.00 12,282 2,082 5.90 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 OBUS 14,235 2,765 5.15 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 2,376 2,632 0.90 PTO 0 0 0.00 23,571 4,398 5.36 0 0 0.00 3,688 7,639 0.48 SBUS 9,700 951 10.20 14,204 1,695 8.38 689 122 5.65 1,834 1,932 0.95 T6 68,067 13,282 5.12 407,572 46,443 8.78 5,926 815 7.27 69,551 75,729 0.92 T7 179 40 4.48 1,007,730 152,525 6.61 57,908 10,917 5.30 67,584 123,864 0.55 UBUS 4,912 486 10.10 30,832 3,503 8.80 8,921 1,474 6.05 15,382 26,815 0.57 Total 42,330,795 1,471,281 28.77 2,327,834 261,961 8.89 74,269 13,427 5.53 4,545,954 1,918,194 2.37 Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory Region Type: Sub-Area Region: Santa Clara (SF) Calendar Year: 2031 Season: Annual Vehicle Classification: EMFAC202x Categories Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips Fuel Consumption Energy Consumption Santa Clara (SF) 2031 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 953.1226477 52309.77038 52309.77038 0 8482.791564 5.558242859 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 13.13397101 825.9794288 825.9794288 0 116.892342 0.099379098 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 603399.0962 22013784.6 22013784.6 0 2803164.773 639.8711052 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 883.737468 25266.39849 25266.39849 0 3799.765194 0.525104131 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 76860.81775 3030639.55 0 3030639.55 365231.4147 0 1170076.999 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 25461.03533 1005550.246 444550.7961 560999.4498 105281.3811 15.2736845 169438.5543 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 46901.01193 1490241.88 1490241.88 0 209139.0513 52.23945503 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.276777681 10.97537797 10.97537797 0 1.355425552 0.000369199 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 522.3461965 22273.32517 0 22273.32517 2538.366039 0 8599.341832 Santa Clara (SF)2031 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 365.1119945 15362.3227 6331.484675 9030.838022 1509.738097 0.21852187 2727.582245 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 319369.3963 11103089.38 11103089.38 0 1484055.287 395.6457694 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1173.677606 41248.49698 41248.49698 0 5500.09096 1.099841882 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 6220.407446 193057.8902 0 193057.8902 30819.47911 0 74536.27956 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 5316.757023 209427.4567 88893.38585 120534.0709 21984.79029 3.086434609 36404.88189 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 19687.3566 719037.7306 719037.7306 0 293312.2792 67.57417896 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11330.44455 424916.3376 424916.3376 0 142522.7388 25.89958754 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2756.217427 152348.5119 0 152348.5119 38618.42883 0 99806.15562 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2433.678314 85545.01417 85545.01417 0 36258.1807 9.11006936 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5486.176806 199001.0884 199001.0884 0 69009.20261 14.32252025 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 693.8669749 36745.81904 0 36745.81904 9200.423634 0 23701.75018 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 30211.11579 170933.851 170933.851 0 60422.23158 3.985415077 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 177155.5583 6038275.157 6038275.157 0 820036.2994 260.3981834 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2393.450036 78706.49268 78706.49268 0 10984.30797 2.821356323 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 6088.019047 187882.3823 0 187882.3823 30112.24512 0 72538.10636 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 3252.526344 125233.1296 53205.86268 72027.26688 13449.19643 1.873612648 21754.38135 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1997.870826 19812.81141 19812.81141 0 199.8669974 4.480433606 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1078.004466 10184.13476 10184.13476 0 107.8004466 1.08776648 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 104.062505 12282.4362 12282.4362 0 2391.356365 2.082130844 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 362.1380916 14235.44914 14235.44914 0 7245.658936 2.764627118 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 30.9887658 2375.644602 0 2375.644602 620.0232262 0 2631.850728 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 23571.30287 23571.30287 0 0 4.39815388 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0 3687.769943 0 3687.769943 0 0 7639.284649 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 199.6537134 9699.906901 9699.906901 0 798.6148537 0.951047046 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 649.5338804 14203.54124 14203.54124 0 9405.250589 1.695311692 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 57.0000408 1833.643979 0 1833.643979 667.0697929 0 1931.6625 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 29.82555163 688.6908673 688.6908673 0 431.8739876 0.121825891 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2.989550976 194.2537576 194.2537576 0 68.69988142 0.02073872 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.497832659 40.32125631 0 40.32125631 11.44019451 0 43.80031639 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3.831799442 268.7767351 268.7767351 0 88.05475118 0.028768663 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.597332908 53.01800175 0 53.01800175 13.72671022 0 57.59258177 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15.15568421 682.9800719 682.9800719 0 348.277623 0.072334856 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2.923782457 157.878782 0 157.878782 67.18852085 0 171.5011197 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 24.83420154 4759.123678 4759.123678 0 570.6899514 0.450536572 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2.430891096 515.1680692 0 515.1680692 55.86187738 0 559.6185856 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 612.6632563 20002.71391 20002.71391 0 8742.704667 2.335574146 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 71.56519873 2852.161121 0 2852.161121 1021.235386 0 3046.904056 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 4.689188827 168.1774704 168.1774704 0 66.91472456 0.024397807 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 715.4954394 23238.24283 23238.24283 0 10210.11992 2.733163614 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 79.29019057 3155.895384 0 3155.895384 1131.471019 0 3371.377015 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 4.71921648 171.0192496 171.0192496 0 67.34321917 0.024564469 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1359.813581 44245.91556 44245.91556 0 19404.5398 5.183459894 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 154.3537729 6110.703573 0 6110.703573 2202.62834 0 6527.936785 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 9.130251529 331.3186951 331.3186951 0 130.2886893 0.047502867 0 Santa Clara (SF)2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 208.0817191 10088.13162 10088.13162 0 2969.326131 1.197056862 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 9.316471157 482.2115295 0 482.2115295 132.9460434 0 515.1364886 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 4.226504661 210.683322 210.683322 0 60.31222151 0.030746272 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1082.291907 42110.16643 42110.16643 0 12511.29444 4.755659785 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 143.8047757 6918.298318 0 6918.298318 1662.383207 0 7333.957198 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 8.047416455 366.697701 366.697701 0 93.02813422 0.046434166 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2249.427479 88255.49468 88255.49468 0 26003.38165 10.00194531 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 282.7537776 13644.72888 0 13644.72888 3268.633668 0 14464.51902 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 15.22881788 693.5004631 693.5004631 0 176.0451346 0.086870135 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2123.239651 83235.0548 83235.0548 0 24544.65036 9.374002964 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 270.9201066 12991.86534 0 12991.86534 3131.836432 0 13772.43073 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 14.70201783 669.4783717 669.4783717 0 169.9553261 0.083869062 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 976.8350637 36700.12736 36700.12736 0 11292.21334 4.161190875 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 61.0929124 4155.618066 0 4155.618066 706.2340673 0 4405.292115 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Other Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 23.41491052 892.4658481 892.4658481 0 270.6763657 0.117237963 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.955489937 387.9993876 387.9993876 0 91.96546368 0.042545286 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.960505556 64.2620298 0 64.2620298 11.10344423 0 68.12296238 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 0.064947403 3.882390094 3.882390094 0 0.75079198 0.000474849 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 302.1542892 15517.11222 15517.11222 0 3492.903583 1.646510573 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 9.575285682 776.9139976 0 776.9139976 110.6903025 0 823.5918348 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 6.289914165 326.3452811 326.3452811 0 72.71140775 0.041258727 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1.953080254 129.8267635 129.8267635 0 44.88178423 0.0130979 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2.477047427 178.0989735 178.0989735 0 56.92254987 0.018053041 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.06137948 465.3777133 465.3777133 0 231.2105005 0.046334351 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13.32317768 3383.874668 3383.874668 0 306.1666232 0.310916894 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 122.6336269 4412.267222 4412.267222 0 629.1105059 0.543655061 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 13.20106669 566.940599 0 566.940599 67.72147211 0 669.5004693 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 8.754782708 335.9938952 335.9938952 0 44.91203529 0.051292887 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 215.8983509 7645.134527 7645.134527 0 1107.55854 0.945651452 0 ELECGASDSL EMFAC Fuel Usage: Year 2031 Vehicle type NG Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 23.64888983 1016.341746 0 1016.341746 121.3188048 0 1200.198535 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 16.10459934 597.3592497 597.3592497 0 82.61659461 0.090121731 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 113.3690076 4131.144331 4131.144331 0 581.5830091 0.509435807 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 12.44166331 529.6117588 0 529.6117588 63.82573277 0 625.418821 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 7.548483951 290.545521 290.545521 0 38.72372267 0.043454492 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 280.2507129 12420.12573 12420.12573 0 1437.686157 1.495880554 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 30.43763504 1858.381302 0 1858.381302 156.1450678 0 2194.563515 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 18.02356908 820.6508988 820.6508988 0 92.46090936 0.120543157 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 88.81105877 3542.793316 3542.793316 0 1136.781552 0.386015915 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 19.50495374 840.1244834 0 840.1244834 249.6634079 0 940.9926751 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 0.846626098 32.34038211 32.34038211 0 10.83681405 0.004234467 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 16.77612121 668.8564018 668.8564018 0 214.7343514 0.072714534 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 3.69651702 159.2106441 0 159.2106441 47.31541786 0 178.3260134 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 0.165891826 6.327373732 6.327373732 0 2.123415377 0.000827892 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 18.53311175 908.0556189 908.0556189 0 237.2238304 0.097977402 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 4.0832461 243.2138799 0 243.2138799 52.26555008 0 272.4149623 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 0.21228626 9.650305424 9.650305424 0 2.717264128 0.001253915 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1347.937181 68067.01645 68067.01645 0 26969.52711 13.2822748 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 162.1560979 12418.47591 0 12418.47591 3244.419206 0 14485.40723 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1033.080016 205283.3741 205283.3741 0 23740.17877 30.04095324 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 110.9762814 23383.21619 0 23383.21619 2550.234947 0 42696.02419 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2.025018252 398.3369536 398.3369536 0 46.53491942 0.06636668 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 NNOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 996.6750667 271970.9382 271970.9382 0 22903.59303 37.44066548 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 431.710698 98825.2679 98825.2679 0 9920.711841 14.02262898 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Other Port Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 95.1803273 23245.55411 23245.55411 0 1557.150155 3.497861789 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Other Port Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 6.671907472 2143.462702 0 2143.462702 109.1524062 0 3901.031891 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 647.2566174 71540.61596 71540.61596 0 10589.11826 11.18630159 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 42.03116743 4422.854619 0 4422.854619 687.6298992 0 8049.450501 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 1.167481527 128.8339023 128.8339023 0 19.09999778 0.021789503 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 648.5583298 27204.74551 27204.74551 0 3327.104232 4.911900549 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 54.97357904 3316.172941 0 3316.172941 282.0144605 0 6508.263188 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 3.78009555 168.6078707 168.6078707 0 19.39189017 0.035436993 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 367.0371985 24219.8734 24219.8734 0 3457.49041 3.832478065 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 76.60845525 6112.605118 0 6112.605118 721.6516485 0 11144.22153 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 23.244144 1524.844016 1524.844016 0 218.9598365 0.251612525 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Dump Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 738.7127681 37862.90642 37862.90642 0 6958.674276 6.301437446 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Dump Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 64.74983892 5214.464687 0 5214.464687 609.9434827 0 9506.773059 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Dump Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 47.96362173 2504.340868 2504.340868 0 451.8173167 0.446926643 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Other Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1138.75072 49464.57234 49464.57234 0 10727.03178 8.129993578 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Other Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 117.74036 7245.276753 0 7245.276753 1109.114191 0 13209.25655 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Single Other Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 71.03367787 3133.255749 3133.255749 0 669.1372455 0.554814413 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 167.4736841 10870.2114 10870.2114 0 770.378947 4.35317106 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 58.85991169 3761.382045 0 3761.382045 270.7555938 0 6998.242017 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 468.8898827 30383.66785 30383.66785 0 2156.893461 6.008423941 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2946.223163 184134.2354 184134.2354 0 42808.62256 28.29152703 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 153.4545817 11570.90732 0 11570.90732 2229.695072 0 21067.26434 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 327.1732484 19665.9185 19665.9185 0 4753.8273 3.531470405 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 73.96960851 3107.467998 3107.467998 0 946.8109889 0.515991589 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 6.308413763 378.8744662 0 378.8744662 80.74769616 0 713.3441946 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1.471837454 178.9219048 178.9219048 0 29.44852377 0.039924839 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.152984214 34.88493835 0 34.88493835 3.06090815 0 70.09548845 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 47.03544053 4911.900021 4911.900021 0 188.1417621 0.486261683 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 294.097702 30831.58765 30831.58765 0 1176.390808 3.50289306 0 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 124.5167043 15381.9903 0 15381.9903 498.0668171 0 26814.56413 Santa Clara (SF) 2031 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 76.8255673 8920.556737 8920.556737 0 307.3022692 1.473549158 0