Notice of Intention to Circulate Recall Petition dated April 25, 2016APR 2 5 2016
PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICECUPERTINO CITY CLERK
I, declare that:
(print full n e)
At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age. ley name, address and telephone
number are as follows:
4 6 't V c$ ;-e7' W1, %l'ey
(print full name) y�
-�✓ Q��fra�r Ci9
(com fete address)
(telephone number)
I personally served to V / , C'. " -, ri
(print full name of officgr sought to be recalled)
a copy of the Notice of Intention to Recall him/her by delivering the copy of the Notice of
Intention to him/her at: , cl EJ y /4,, (/
(complete address)
Cl rF V,
c is
on Iq i� at ( 1,`61 C (a.m, p.m.
(date) (time) circle one)
I have attached the original of the Notice of Intention to Recall to this Proof of Personal
Service.
1, do e to -a 0 t WE 11 � y , declare under penalty of perjury
(print full name)
under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that
(print full name)
AoV, I z �- '7-ol6 at
(date)
executed this proof of personal service on
Cv
(place of sigi
e.g., city or county)
(complete signature)
TO THE HONORABLE Councilmember Barry Chang
(name of officer sought to be recalled)
Pursuant to Section 11020 of the California Elections Code, the undersigned, registered qualified
voters of the City of Cupertino , in the State of California, hereby give notice that we are the
(name of district)
proponents of a recall petition and that we intend to seek your recall and removal from the office of
Cily Council , in the City of Cupertino California, and to demand
(title of office) (name of district)
election of a successor in that office.
The grounds for the proposal recall are as follows:
The undersigned voters propose that Councilmember Barry Chang be recalled from office
due to his pattern of abusive and dishonest behavior toward the public and other council members.
Barry Chang has failed to fulfill his fiduciary duty to Cupertino citizens. He started to run
for State Assembly only six months after being sworn -in, and used his position in Cupertino to
solicit large campaign contributions from developers, construction companies and real estate
brokers that will benefit from his actions on the City Council.
Barry Chang has repeatedly disgraced the City of Cupertino, by personal attacks against
residents in council meetings and in the State of the City address. Even when corrected by other
council members and staff members, he persisted in these defamatory comments and blatant lies
without remorse or contrition.
Barry Chang has abused. his position as mayor. He called a special meeting without proper
justification, purposely circumventing the Brown Act, to change the ballot label for the Cupertino
Citizen's Sensible Growth Initiative, brazenly ignoring the recommendations of the city's own
attorneys to conform to the California Election Code, and taking the recommendation of a
developer's attorney instead.
The printed names, signatures, and residence addresses of the proponents are as follows:
Name Address
Signature f.
�—
V
6
Pagel of 3
Name
Address
Signature
7
qlv 14-
"lam 6w
10
12
A ZHO416
�,-I-h
�fc-nj ZIP
�21,JC,
13
rffOOLTAW-7 OAA161
tA r A 0." M
7 01
14
T
Cc(,e rLn o
5
15
16
Ct.,( 'Mr -t-7
21�
17
4-0,44t-o eyl 9<-0
18
cvpmr�wo (A 95-0
19
PC4
0
—
2
A
21
61
T I R Q T I-b'O\ M'A
6�Z PC r--(i /To C./t
Ik
15b I
ry
22
( ►
C,4 P A
jL %
23
9-(-
Telephone number to contact proponents (optional):
Page2 of
A copy of this and the proof of servicer will be filed with the City of Cupertino Elections
(name of city)
Official. You may file an answer to the statement of the proponents with the
City of Cupertino Elections Official within 7 days after the notice is filed. It may not be
(name of city)
more than 200 words. If an answer is filed, a copy of it must also be served personally or by
certified mail within that same 7 day period on one of the above proponents. The answer shall
include the printed name, signature, and business or residence address of the officer sought to be
recalled.
Page 3 of 3