Loading...
24-129 San Jose Water Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System)RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Cupertino WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (Exempt from recording fees per Govt. Code § 27383.) (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE) AGREEMENT FOR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY (WATER SYSTEM) 62847373.v2 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECITALS.....................................................................................................................................1 TERMSAND CONDITIONS....................................................................................................2 Article1— Definitions.................................................................................................................2 Article 2 — Lease of Water System.............................................................................................7 2.1 Lease.................................................................................................................................7 2.2 Term.................................................................................................................................7 2.3 Use of Water System......................................................................................................7 2.4 Title................................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Compensation.................................................................................................................8 2.6 Net Lease.........................................................................................................................9 2.7 Taxes and Assessments................................................................................................10 2.8 Liens and Encumbrances.............................................................................................10 Article 3 — Operation of Water System..................................................................................10 3.1 General...........................................................................................................................10 3.2 Maintenance..................................................................................................................11 3.3 Repair.............................................................................................................................11 3.4 Capital Improvements.................................................................................................11 3.5 SWRCB Permit..............................................................................................................15 3.6 Customer Services........................................................................................................15 3.7 Emergency Services......................................................................................................15 3.8 Water Quality Testing..................................................................................................16 3.9 Other Services...............................................................................................................16 3.10 Reports.......................................................................................................................16 3.11 Hazardous Substances.............................................................................................18 3.12 Water Supply.............................................................................................................19 3.13 City Access.................................................................................................................19 3.14 City Inspection and Oversight................................................................................19 Article 4 — Customer Rates and Billing..................................................................................20 62847373.v2 4.1 Customer Rates.............................................................................................................20 4.2 Customer Billing and Collections...............................................................................21 Article 5 - Insurance and Indemnity......................................................................................22 5.1 Insurance........................................................................................................................ 22 5.2 Indemnity......................................................................................................................24 Article 6 - Default, Termination, and Expiration.................................................................25 6.1 Default............................................................................................................................25 6.2 Surrender Upon Expiration or Termination.............................................................28 6.3 Transition Period..........................................................................................................28 6.4 Dispute Resolution.......................................................................................................28 Article 7 - Miscellaneous Provisions.....................................................................................29 7.1 Recitals...........................................................................................................................29 7.2 Notice.............................................................................................................................29 7.3 Compliance with Laws................................................................................................30 7.4 Nondiscrimination........................................................................................................30 7.5 Force Majeure................................................................................................................30 7.6 Assignment....................................................................................................................31 7.7 Governing Law and Venue.........................................................................................31 7.8 Waiver............................................................................................................................31 7.9 Integration.....................................................................................................................31 7.10 Amendment...............................................................................................................31 7.11 Interpretation............................................................................................................. 32 7.12 Severability................................................................................................................32 7.13 Execution in Counterparts.......................................................................................32 7.14 Authorization............................................................................................................32 CITY OF CUPERTINO AGREEMENT FOR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY (WATER SYSTEM) This Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) ("Lease") is entered into on QC- Zt p [Ii 7�i, by and between the City of Cupertino ("City"), and San Jose Water Company, a California Corporation ("Lessee") (individually, a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties"). RECITALS A. Prior to City's incorporation in 1955, and continuing thereafter, the Cupertino area was provided with water service by investor -owned private utility companies. B. From about 1960 until October 1, 1997, in the areas not already served by the private water companies, City provided water service to approximately 4,200 (currently approximately 4,600) metered customers in the service area described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Service Area"). C. As a result, Cupertino has been served by three roughly equal -size water systems: a City -owned system within the Service Area and two other systems owned and operated by investor -owned utilities. D. Within the Service Area, City is the owner of certain real property, easements and rights of way and those certain reservoirs, pipes, wells, pumps and appurtenant facilities (including without limitation buildings, pump houses, sheds and other structures) constituting all of City's water system ("Water System") as generally depicted in the Water System Map attached as Exhibit B hereto. E. City has no legal obligation to provide public water service to its residents and desires to allow those services to be provided City-wide exclusively by investor - owned utilities. F. The Lessee has been operating the Water System since 1997 pursuant to a lease agreement with the City ("1997 Lease"). The term of the 1997 Lease will expire on September 30, 2024. City of Cupertino Page 4 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) G. Pursuant to the requirements of Public Utilities Code section 10061, the City issued a Request for Proposals on July 31, 2023 ("RFP") and received one responsive proposal from qualified water system operators. During a public hearing on Ly 16, 2024, which was scheduled and noticed pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 10061 and Government Code section 6066, the City Council examined the proposals and staff recommendations, and found that Lessee was the best qualified operator to continue to provide equal or better service to the customers of the Water System for just compensation as specified herein. H. Following expiration of the 1997 Lease and as of the Effective Date, the Lessee will continue operating the Water System in accordance with the terms of this Lease. I. As consideration for the valuable property, rights, and privileges granted under this Lease by the City, acting in its proprietary capacity, to Lessee, the Parties mutually agree that the reasonable just compensation will be comprised of the one-time Concession Fee, the Annual Investment Rent, and the annual Franchise Fee, as further specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS Article 1- Definitions The following definitions apply to capitalized terms used in the Lease, including the recitals and exhibits hereto, unless otherwise specified: 1997 Lease has the meaning given in the Recitals. Annual Investment Rent means the annual rent for the Water System to be paid by Lessee to the City, the proceeds of which will be allocated by the City to fund Capital Improvement Projects. The initial Annual Investment Rent shall be $1,800,000, and shall be adjusted annually as described in Section 2.5(B) (Annual Investment Rent). Asset Management Plan means the 2019 Water Distribution System Asset Management City of Cupertino Page 5 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) Plan, as updated by the memorandum dated December 8, 2021 ("2021 Memorandum"), prepared by Kayuga Solution, attached as Exhibit C to this Lease, as may be amended from time to time. AWWA Handbook means the most current version of the Water Distribution Systems Handbook as published by the American Water Works Association. Capital Improvement means any physical addition, betterment, replacement, or improvement to the Water System, excluding Maintenance or Repair, which will either enhance the Water System's overall value, increase its useful life, improve its performance or adapt it to new uses. Capital Improvement Plan means the plan developed by the Parties and approved by the City for Capital Improvement Projects to be implemented by Lessee, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and which may be amended from time to time by the Parties as further specified in Section 3.4 (Capital Improvements), herein. Capital Improvement Project means a project for construction of a Capital Improvement pursuant to a City -approved design, and includes all physical requirements for the project, including, as applicable, related demolition and removal of existing components in accordance with Laws, and which is subject to City reimbursement for Project Costs as more particularly described in Section 3.4 (Capital Improvements). City means the City of Cupertino. Concession Fee means the one-time fee more particularly described in Section 2.5 (Compensation) herein. Consequential Damages means any special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages arising out of or relating to this Lease that do not flow directly and immediately from an injurious act but that result indirectly from an action or failure to act, such as revenue losses, loss of use, cost of capital, debt service, loss of profit on related contracts, administrative costs, loss of bonding capacity, lost opportunity, claims of taxpayers and other indirect damage, whether arising out of breach of this Lease, tort (including negligence) or any other theory of liability. Construction Cost Index means the most current version of the Construction Cost Index for San Francisco published by Engineering News Record. City of Cupertino Page 6 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) County means Santa Clara County. CPUC means the California Public Utilities Commission. Customer means a retail customer of the Water System served by a physical connection to the Water System. Director means the Director of the City's Public Works Department, unless otherwise indicated by the context. Effective Date means the date that the Lease becomes effective as more particularly described in Section 2.2 (Term) herein. Environmental Laws means any Federal, State or local laws or any regulations promulgated pursuant to such laws, as such laws or regulations may from time to time be amended, applicable to the Water System, groundwater or the utility services, regulating or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning or relating to (1) the protection of human health or the environment, (2) the regulation, use or exposure to Hazardous Substances or (3) the operation, Maintenance, construction, Repair or rehabilitation of the Water System. Force Maj eure Event has the meaning set forth in Section 7.5 (Force Majeure) herein. Franchise Fee means the annual fee more particularly described in Section 2.5 (Compensation) herein. Hard Costs mean the reasonable direct costs for construction of a Capital Improvement Project, including but not limited to labor, equipment, materials, permitting, traffic control and inspection, but excluding costs for planning, design, project management, administration, or other such "soft" costs. Hazardous Substance means any solid, liquid, gas, odor, heat, sound, vibration, radiation or other substance, material or waste which is defined as contaminant, pollutant, dangerous substance, toxic substance, hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous substance, extremely hazardous waste, restricted hazardous waste, residual waste, solid waste or similar term which is or becomes regulated by applicable Environmental Laws (as defined herein) or which is classified as hazardous or toxic under applicable Environmental Laws (including, without limitation, hydrocarbons, petroleum, City of Cupertino Page 7 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) gasoline, diesel fuel, crude oil or any products, other petroleum hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos, and urea formaldehyde foam insulation, or their by- products or fractions thereof). Indemnified Person has the meaning given Section 3.11(B) (Indemnity). Laws means all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, directives, covenants, easements and restrictions of record, permits, and requirements of any applicable fire insurance underwriter or rating bureau, relating in any manner to the Water System or the groundwater, including, but not limited to, SWRCB Permit; the SCVWD Contract and any amendments thereto; and the foregoing items pertaining to: (1) industrial hygiene, (2) environmental conditions on, in, under or about the Water System or the groundwater, including soil and groundwater conditions, (3) the use, generation, manufacture, production, installation, maintenance, removal, transportation, storage, spill or release of any Hazardous Substance or storage tank, and (4) prevailing wage requirements, payment bond requirements, working hours and workers compensation insurance, unemployment insurance benefits, Federal Insurance Contributions Act laws, and business license requirements now in effect or which may hereafter come into effect, and whether or not reflecting a change in policy from any previously existing policy. Lease means this Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System), including all exhibits attached hereto or incorporated herein, and as amended by any duly executed amendments, if any. Lessee has the meaning given in the Recital and includes its officers, assigns, and successors. Maintain or Maintenance means routine maintenance activities or actions, other than Capital Improvements, to keep an asset in good working order so that it will operate as required under this Lease. Maintenance Plan means the Maintenance Plan attached as Exhibit E hereto, as may be amended from time to time. Operating Standards means, collectively, the operation -related requirements in this Lease, including the exhibits hereto, the applicable standards in the most current AWWA Handbook or other applicable water operation standards, and requirements of Laws. City of Cupertino Page 8 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) Project Costs means all Hard Costs and Soft Costs, as defined, in connection with Capital Improvement Projects. Rates means the rates, surcharges, surcredits, and other service charges or fees and penalties that Lessee may impose on Customers for the water services provided pursuant to this Lease. Regulatory Cap means the maximum benchmark for rates charged to Customers as more particularly described in Section 4.1 (Customer Rates) herein. Repair means activities or actions, other than Capital Improvements, to restore an asset to the condition and level of service required by this Lease after an asset has failed or has been damaged. RFP means the Request for Proposals issued by the City on or about July 31, 2023, for leasing the Water System pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 10061. SCVWD means the Santa Clara Valley Water District (also known as "Valley Water"). SCVWD Contract means the contract between the City and SCVWD for a supply of treated water, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit F. Section means a numbered section of this Lease, unless otherwise indicated by the context. Service Area has the meaning given in the Recitals. Soft Costs means all other costs and expenses paid or incurred in connection with Capital Improvement Projects which are not Hard Costs, including costs for planning, design, project management, administration, and construction management. Except as set out in Section 3.4(J) (Lessee's Responsibilities), the City will pay for all soft costs up to 24% of the total Hard Costs. State means the State of California. SWRCB means the State Water Resources Control Board. SWRCB Permit means the SWRCB Domestic Water Supply Permit 68-43, as amended, which is incorporated herein by reference. City of Cupertino Page 9 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) Term means the existing term of this Lease as more particularly described in Section 2.2 (Term) herein, including any duly authorized and executed extensions thereto, if any. Water System has the meaning given in the Recitals. Article 2 - Lease of Water System 2.1 Lease. City hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases from City, the Water System as described in Exhibit B. Except as specifically set forth in this Lease, the Water System is leased in an "as is" condition. City also grants a concession to Lessee to provide water service within the Service Area, and in connection therewith, to use, possess, operate, manage, Maintain, Repair, rehabilitate, expand, and improve the Water System in exchange for those Rates Lessee establishes in accordance with and pursuant to this Lease. In conveying this interest in governmental property to a private party, neither City nor any of its agents has made any representation or warranties with respect to the Water System except as specifically set forth in this Lease. 2.2 Term. The term of this Lease will commence on October 1, 2024_ ("Effective Date") and will continue for a period of 12 years, unless terminated earlier as otherwise provided in Article 6 herein ("Term"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if mutually agreed, the Parties may extend the Term for an additional period of up to eight years, for a total Term of up to twenty years. For the Term to be extended, one of the Parties must provide written notice to the other Party requesting extension of the original Term no later than 180 days prior to expiration of the original Term, and subject to mutual agreement on the duration and conditions for any such extension, the Lease will be amended to so extend the Term. 2.3 Use of Water System. At all times during the Term, Lessee will use the Water System for the purpose of furnishing potable water service, including water service for fire protection, to all Customers in accordance with the applicable Operating Standards relating to service, subject to the provisions of this Lease. Provision of water from the Water System outside of the Service Area is prohibited unless authorized in writing in advance by the Director. (A) Property. Lessee will not retire, sell, transfer, convey, dispose of, or encumber City of Cupertino Page 10 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) any real property or personal property of the Water System without City's duly authorized prior written permission. (B) City's Right to Use. City retains the full right to use or continue to use any portion(s) of the Water System, including easements, tanks, pump station, wells, buildings, and appurtenances, for any legal purpose which does not interfere with Lessee's use of the Water System to furnish water service to Customers. (C) Development. City reserves the right to approve future developments to be served by the Water System subject to available water supply and applicable Laws, including the requirements of the SWRCB Permit and provisions of the SCVWD Contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all connections to the Water System required for future developments shall be performed by Lessee or by a contractor approved by Lessee at the sole expense of the developer. Lessee shall not be responsible or liable for any cost associated with such connections. 2.4 Title. City retains title to the Water System. Lessee will not own the Water System or any part thereof or any interest therein during the Term of this Lease, including ownership of any Capital Improvements made during the Term. Title to all Capital Improvements, improvements from Maintenance or Repair, or improvements installed for City -approved development made during the Term will vest in City upon acceptance by or beneficial use by City, whichever occurs first. No such vesting of title of any improvement will alter or limit Lessee's obligations for Repair and Maintenance of the Water System as set forth herein. 2.5 Compensation. As bargained -for consideration for the benefits it derives from this Lease, Lessee will pay the City the amounts set forth below. The Parties agree and acknowledge that the following payments to City are not levies imposed by City on Lessee in its governmental capacity, but rather voluntary payments as fair and reasonable compensation for a valuable interest in the Water System and the use of City's property and resources related to the Water System. The Parties further agree and acknowledge that the amounts to be paid pursuant to this Section were determined by a fair and competitive procurement process and good faith negotiation. The following payments will be legally incident on Lessee and the legal duty to pay will remain with Lessee regardless of how Lessee opts, in its sole discretion, to fund the payments. (A) Concession Fee. Lessee will pay the City a one-time Concession Fee of $22,100,000 within 30 days following the Effective Date of this Lease. The City of Cupertino Page 11 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) Concession Fee is consideration for Lessee's right to sell water from the Water System. Except as set out in Section 6.2 (Termination of Lease for Convenience), the Concession Fee is not a security deposit and is not refundable. The Concession Fee may be used to fund Capital Improvement Projects or for any other legal purposes the City desires. (B) Annual Investment Rent. Upon the Effective Date and on each anniversary of the Effective Date each year thereafter during the Term, Lessee will pay to City as Annual Investment Rent, the sum of $1,800,000, subject to an annual adjustment based on the Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, applied on a cumulative basis (i.e., after the Effective Date, by adjusting the prior year's Annual Investment Rent). City will notify Lessee in writing at least 30 days prior to the date that the Annual Investment Rent is due of the adjusted amount pursuant to the Construction Cost Index, along with a calculation evidencing the adjusted amount. The Annual Investment Rent will be used, up to the amount recommended in the approved Capital Improvement Plan, to reimburse Lessee for the completion of City -approved Capital Improvement Projects, and excess amounts which have not been reimbursed to Lessee in any year will be carried forward to reimburse Capital Improvement Projects in the following year, in each case as further specified in Section 3.4 (Capital Improvements) and the Capital Improvements Plan. In the event that Lessee is due reimbursements to which the City agreed (in writing), were undisputed, due and payable, for Capital Improvement Projects from the previous year, the Annual Investment Rent will be reduced by any amount owing to Lessee for such Capital Improvement Projects in satisfaction of the amounts owing to Lessee and any remaining amount will be a debt due and payable from the City to Lessee. (C) Franchise Fee. As consideration for the City's costs to administer this Lease, including the concession and franchise rights granted herein, Lessee will pay City an annual Franchise Fee, due the first year by November 1, 2025, and annually thereafter during the Term. The amount of the Franchise Fee will be equal to two percent of Lessee's annual gross receipts from Customers for the preceding year from the use, operation and possession of the Water System (with the total prorated for the final year of the Term if less than a 12-month period). The Parties agree that this constitutes fair and reasonable compensation for City administration of this Lease and the franchise conferred herein. 2.6 Net Lease. This Lease will be deemed and construed to be a "net lease" and Lessee City of Cupertino Page 12 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) hereby agrees that the Annual Investment Rent is an absolute net return to City free and clear of any expenses, charges or setoffs other than as set forth in this Lease. 2.7 Taxes and Assessments. Lessee will pay all taxes, assessments, fees, levies, charges, license or permit fees and other governmental charges of any kind or nature which are levied, charged, assessed or imposed during the Term of this Lease upon or against the Water System or the groundwater or the leasehold estate created hereby or which may be imposed upon any taxable interest of Lessee acquired pursuant to the Lease. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Lessee acknowledges that this Lease may create a possessory interest which may be subject to property taxation and that Lessee may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Any such tax will be the sole responsibility of Lessee. 2.8 Liens and Encumbrances. Lessee agrees to keep the Water System free and clear of all liens, security interests and encumbrances except for those consented to in writing and duly authorized by City. Lessee agrees to promptly pay all amounts due for materials, parts, labor, water, power and other consumables and supplies furnished at Lessee's instance or request upon or to the Water System and to keep the Water System free and clear of all liens resulting from such payment obligations. Lessee agrees to require that any contractor performing work on City - owned property pursuant to a contract in excess of $25,000, will provide a payment bond in conformance with the requirements of Civil Code section 9550, as may be amended from time to time. Article 3 - Operation of Water System 3.1 General. In addition to the requirements of this Lease, Lessee will operate the Water System in accordance with the Operating Standards. Lessee will, at its own expense, manage and operate the Water System and pay all costs and expenses of operating the Water System as specified herein, including, but not limited to, the costs of all water, utilities, Maintenance, Repair, and Capital Improvements, and all public charges, taxes and assessments of any nature whatsoever. City is not responsible for payment of any costs or expenses of any kind or character in connection with or related to the operation of or improvements to the Water System except and only to the extent as expressly set forth in this Lease (including, City of Cupertino Page 13 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) but not limited to, City's payment and reimbursement obligations set forth in this Lease). 3.2 Maintenance. At all times during the Term, Lessee will Maintain the assets of the Water System in good working order consistent with the requirements of the current Maintenance Plan, and consistent with the Operating Standards. Within 10 days of the anniversary of the Effective Date each year, Lessee will submit proposed revisions, if any, to the Maintenance Plan for City's review and approval. If requested by City, Lessee must revise and resubmit the proposed revised Maintenance Plan within a reasonable time period after request, such period to be no less than 3 weeks, but not more than 6 weeks, unless mutually agreed upon otherwise. Upon approval by the Director, the revised Maintenance Plan will supersede any prior version. All Maintenance will be provided in accordance with the approved Maintenance Plan to ensure the Water System remains in good condition and at Lessee's sole expense. Maintenance work is not subject to reimbursement by City pursuant to Section 3.4 (Capital Improvements), below. However, Maintenance work is subject to the requirements of Section 3.4(F) (True - Up of Capital Improvement Reimbursements) pertaining to contractors. 3.3 Repair. Lessee is solely responsible at Lessee's sole expense for the prompt Repair of any assets of the Water System during the Term to ensure safe and effective operation of the Water System. If Lessee fails to effectuate any Repair on a timely basis, City reserves the right, but not the obligation, to have the Repair made at Lessee's expense, such amount to be based on the documented costs incurred by City. Repair work is not subject to reimbursement by City pursuant to Section 3.4 (Capital Improvements), below. However, Repair work is subject to the requirements of Section 3.4(G) (Contractors) pertaining to contractors. 3.4 Capital Improvements. Lessee will be responsible for Capital Improvements to be designed, constructed, and completed during the Term in accordance with the terms of this Lease and the Asset Management Plan, and as further specified in the current Capital Improvement Plan and as required by Laws. The parties may update the Asset Management Plan on an annual basis to reflect Capital Improvement Projects completed during the prior year and to reflect the current needs of the Water System or as otherwise set out in clause (B) below. (A) Capital Improvement Plan. The Capital Improvement Plan in effect on the Effective Date of this Lease will include a five-year Capital Improvement Plan City of Cupertino Page 14 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) approved by City, which also includes a list of Capital Improvement Projects which are to be prioritized for completion during the first three years of the Term. Within 10 days of the anniversary of the Effective Date each year, Lessee will submit proposed revisions (including in accordance with clause (B) below), if any, to the current five-year Capital Improvement Plan for City's review and approval, which approval shall not be withheld. Subject to clause (B) below, proposed revisions must be consistent with the current needs of the Water System, the Asset Management Plan, and the Operating Standards. If requested by City, Lessee must revise and resubmit the proposed revised Capital Improvement Plan within a reasonable time period after request, such period to be no less than 3 weeks, but not more than 6 weeks, unless mutually agreed upon otherwise. (B) Revisions to Capital Improvement Plan. In the event that (i) unexpected Capital Improvement Projects become necessary or the required Capital Improvement Projects, which in either case, result in investments beyond the Annual Investment Rent being required, or (ii) Capital Improvement Projects are delayed due to an uninsurable Force Majeure Event, the existence of Hazardous Substances (other than caused by the negligence of Lessee) or City fault; or (iii) an uninsurable Force Majeure Event, the existence of Hazardous Substances or City fault occurs that has a material impact on the performance of Capital Improvements, then Lessee shall submit proposed revisions to the five-year Capital Improvement Plan together with adjustments to the Annual Investment Rent for City's review and approval, in its reasonable discretion. Upon approval by City, the revised Capital Improvement Plan will supersede any prior version. If the City does not approve, Section 6.6 (Dispute Resolution) will apply to resolve the form of Capital Improvement Plan to be complied with by Lessee. . (C) Minimum Annual Investment Rent. Subject to reimbursement under Section 3.4(D) (Reimbursable Costs), each year during the Term, Lessee is solely responsible for investing a minimum of the Annual Investment Rent in construction of Capital Improvement Projects consistent with the requirements of the current Capital Improvement Plan. (D) Reimbursable Costs. Lessee will be solely responsible for the cost to design, bid, and manage any Capital Improvement Project. However, provided that Lessee has fully complied with the requirements of this Lease as it relates to the Capital Improvement Project, including this Section, City will reimburse Lessee for Project Costs expended on approved Capital Improvement Projects as set forth below, City of Cupertino Page 15 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) with the total annual reimbursement capped at the amount of the Annual Investment Rent paid by Lessee for that one-year period. City's reimbursement obligation will not exceed the amount recommended in the 2021 Memorandum with the Asset Management Plan and based on documented Project Costs for construction of the Capital Improvement Projects. In addition, City's reimbursement obligation is limited to City -approved Capital Improvement Projects that are completed in accordance with the requirements of this Lease and accepted by City. (E) Standards. The design and construction of Capital Improvement Projects must be consistent with the requirements of this Lease, the Asset Management Plan, the Operating Standards, and Laws (in effect at the time of the Capital Improvement Project), and will provide a minimum design life of ten years for pumps, mechanical and electrical equipment, 40 years for above -ground buildings and structures, and 50 years for underground pipes and lines, measured, in each case, from City acceptance of the relevant Capital Improvement Project. The plans or design for any Capital Improvement Project is subject to the timely and reasonable review and approval by the Director pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 2.28.040 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, or as otherwise required for purposes of design immunity pursuant to Government Code section 830.6. (F) True -Up of Capital Improvement Reimbursements. Following the completion of each Capital Improvement Project, Lessee and City will confer in good faith regarding any true -up of City's reimbursement obligation that may be necessary or appropriate based on the total Project Costs for each project, including for any increase in Project Costs due to City directed -change or City fault, the existence of Hazardous Substances (other than caused by the negligence of Lessee) impacting a Capital Improvement Project or uninsurable Force Majeure Events: (G) Contractors. Lessee may contract with qualified, licensed design professionals or contractors for design and construction of Capital Improvement Projects or for Maintenance or Repairs. Lessee's contracts for construction must require that the contractor comply with Laws and must warranty its work for a period of at least one year following City's acceptance of the work. Lessee's contracts with design professionals and contractors must include requirements for insurance and indemnity that are satisfactory to the City's risk manager, which may include naming the City as an additional insured. Lessee is solely responsible for any such contracts, and any default by a contracting party will not relieve the City of Cupertino Page 16 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) Lessee of its obligation to complete the Capital Improvements in accordance with this Lease. (H) Cost Estimates. A minimum of 30 days prior to beginning any work on a Capital Improvement Project, Lessee will submit to the City an itemized schedule of anticipated Project Costs for each Capital Improvement Project for City review and approval. (I) Progress Meetings and Reports. During construction of any Capital Improvement Projects, designated representatives for Lessee and City will participate in regularly scheduled construction progress meetings, as agreed upon between the Parties. At least five days before each such progress meeting, Lessee will provide City with a summary report for each such Capital Improvement Project regarding progress of construction, including payments to date as a percentage of the total project, the percentage of the project that is complete, and the following: (1) updates regarding estimated and actual Project Costs; (2) update and narrative with respect to progress schedules; ,(3) overview of the work currently being performed; (4) narrative of any expected upcoming issues or changes in the design; and (5) an updated list of any outstanding issues and action items. (J) Lessee's Responsibilities. Lessee is solely responsible for obtaining or providing all necessary services in connection with planning, design, direction, inspection, and supervision for each Capital Improvement Project, all necessary permits from applicable regulatory agencies (including City permits), for providing all materials, supplies, and equipment required for the completion, start-up, testing, commissioning, and performance of each Capital Improvement Project. Lessee is solely responsible for ensuring that all Capital Improvement Projects are constructed in compliance with applicable Laws, including prevailing wage and payment bond requirements. CEQA and NEPA approval documentation will be prepared by the Lessee. All Soft Costs for preparation of CEQA / NEPA City of Cupertino Page 17 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) documentation shall be reimbursable and not subject to the 24% cap of Hard Costs as provided in the definition of Soft Costs. (K) Documents. Within 30 days following completion of each Capital Improvement Project, Lessee will provide to City, in electronic form, and make available for review by City, a set of "as -built" plans for each Capital Improvement Project completed; all manuals required for operation and maintenance of the components of the Capital Improvement Project; and copies of warranties issued by the manufacturer of the equipment and materials installed as part of the Capital Improvement Project. (L) Invoicing. Lessee must submit detailed monthly invoices to City for reimbursement for eligible Project Costs it has incurred for work completed during the preceding month on Capital Improvement Projects pursuant to this Section. Upon request by City, Lessee will promptly provide documentation to substantiate any of the costs for which it seeks reimbursement. The City will make payments on all undisputed amounts within 30 days after receiving a detailed invoice and any requested documentation. Within such 30 days period after receipt of a detailed invoice, if City disputes all or any portion of the invoice, City shall promptly provide Lessee reasonably detailed reason(s) for any disputed portions of such invoice and withhold the disputed amount, and Section 6.6 (Dispute Resolution) shall apply. 3.5 SWRCB Permit. Lessee is responsible for compliance with the terms of the SWRCB Permit and administration of the SWRCB Permit. 3.6 Customer Services. Lessee is solely responsible for satisfying all Customer service obligations associated with Lessee's provision of water service as set forth herein and consistent with the Operating Standards. (A) General Requirements. Lessee's Customer service obligations include, but are not limited to, issuing detailed billing statements to all Customers for services provided; payment processing; responding to Customer inquiries on water service, bills, leaks or other concerns; collecting payments; processing applications for new or transfer of service; collection of Customer deposits for new service; collection of construction meter deposits; and investigation of Customer complaints. City of Cupertino Page 18 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) (B) Drought Education. Lessee will provide ongoing drought education, by providing billing inserts about water conservation during drought, holding water conservation workshops and any other mutually agreed upon activities, to Customers consistent with Lessee's standard drought education programs provided to similarly situated customers and will enforce drought -related restrictions on water use as required by Laws or recommendations of SCVWD, including any City-wide requirements imposed by the City acting in its governmental capacity. Lessee will submit an annual written report on drought education to City within 10 days of the anniversary of the Effective Date for each year during the Term. The report must summarize Lessee's efforts to educate Customers and to enforce any applicable drought- related restrictions. The annual report must illustrate the effectiveness of Lessee's efforts in one or more summary tables or graphs showing the change in annual water use by residential and by commercial Customers. (C) Confidentiality. Lessee will use all commercially reasonable efforts to keep all Customer information confidential, whether received from City or developed during the Term, and in compliance with Laws. 3.7 Emergency Services. Lessee is solely responsible for maintaining 24-hour on -call responses to emergency calls or Customer inquiries; providing an emergency or natural disaster operations plan; maintaining an emergency communications system; providing or having immediate access to equipment required to perform emergency repair work to vital Water System equipment and water mains, including providing emergency backup generator at the Mann Pumping station or anywhere else that may be needed to ensure uninterrupted delivery of potable water to Customers. 3.8 Water Quality Testing. Lessee is solely responsible for performing or causing to be performed by a laboratory certified by the State, any and all water sampling, analysis, testing and reporting as required by Laws governing water sources, distribution mains or Customer premises, including Laws of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, State Department of Health Services and Office of Drinking Water, and the County Environmental Health Department. This obligation includes, but is not limited to: scheduling and collecting water samples to test for microbiological, inorganic and organic constituents; transportation to certified lab; preparation of monitoring plans; sample collection training; reporting to appropriate regulator(s); record keeping; analysis interpretation; special or City of Cupertino Page 19 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) emergency sample collection and analysis; emergency notification to affected Customers, if required; preparation and distribution of any and all published and distributed Customer reports on water quality; management of a cross -control program; new well or water source sampling and analysis; response to Customer inquiries on water quality issues; conducting annual system survey with State Department of Health Services; obtaining permits and compliance with any air district with jurisdiction over the Water System; providing hazardous materials control program, and ensuring any required operator certification is in compliance with Laws. 3.9 Other Services. Lessee is solely responsible, at its own expense, for implementing any City, County, SCVWD, State or federal water conservation program as established by mandate or law during the term; maintaining distribution system maps and plat maps; preparing any required urban water management plans; and in general, doing all such acts and performing all such services as required to operate the Water System as required by this Lease. All maps, plans and records required by this Section and/or through the operation, Maintenance and improvement of the Water System will be transmitted to City at a minimum frequency as specified in Section 3.10 (Reports). 3.10 Reports. In addition to the reporting requirements specified elsewhere in this Lease, including for Capital Improvement Projects set forth in Section 3.4 (Capital Improvements), Lessee will provide City with written reports related to Lessee's operation of the Water System, as specified herein. (A) Annual Summaries. Each year during the Term, within 10 days of the anniversary of the Effective Date, Lessee will submit summary reports regarding activities during the preceding year, for the following: (1) Annual Operations Report: General status of overall operation, expenditures and revenue of the Water System including priority needs and concerns. (2) Annual Maintenance Report: Maintenance completed, in progress, and scheduled, including compliance with the current Maintenance Plan. (3) Annual Repair Report: Repairs completed, in progress, and needed. City of Cupertino Page 20 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) (4) Annual Report on Capital Improvement Projects: Capital Improvement Projects planned, in progress, and completed, including compliance with the current Capital Improvement Plan. (5) Annual Report on Developer -funded Expansions to Water System: Summarize status of all developer -funded expansions to the Water System, including percentage of completion and pertinent comments relative to the project. (6) Annual Customer Service Report: List Customer service requests and complaints, including the number of calls received by issue (e.g., general, lack of water, billing, water quality, etc.) and resolution of each such Customer request or complaint. (7) Annual Water Quality Report: Water quality analysis of microbiological testing, including quantity of water delivered to all Customer types, quantity of water delivered from SCVWD, quantity of water delivered from each well site, estimated annual amount of Water System loss, number of water quality tests completed, number of water quality samples testing positive for coliform and action taken, results of annual water quality tests for all constituents tested and action taken for any constituent testing out of range. (B) Periodically. In addition to any other reporting requirement set forth herein, Lessee will provide any additional report or information that is reasonably requested by City to ensure operation and Maintenance of the Water System in compliance with this Lease. Any water quality testing positive for coliform or constituent exceeding testing range is to be immediately reported to the City. (C) End of Term. Within 30 days following expiration of the Term or early termination of the Lease, whichever occurs first, Lessee will provide City with an updated version of all of the annual reports specified above. This provision will survive expiration or termination of the Lease. 3.11 Hazardous Substances. (A) Release of Hazardous Substances. Lessee will not cause or permit to occur any release, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, transportation, or disposal City of Cupertino Page 21 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) of Hazardous Substance on, in, under, or from the Water System or the groundwater or any portion of it in violation of Laws. If Lessee does cause any release or disposal of any Hazardous Substance on, in, or under the Water System or any portion of it, Lessee, at its own cost and expense, will immediately take such action as is necessary to detain the spread of and remove the Hazardous Substance as required by applicable Law. Lessee will promptly notify City of any release or disposal (of which Lessee has knowledge) of any Hazardous Substance on, in, under or from the Water System or the groundwater. If Hazardous Substances other than those caused or released by Lessee exist or occur on, in, under or from the Water System or the groundwater, Lessee shall not be responsible for the costs of any action to address, remediate, characterize, remove, treat, dispose, transport or handle such Hazardous Substances and the costs thereof shall be reimbursed to Lessee from City or deducted from any amounts owing from Lessee to City. Lessee is responsible for ensuring all water delivered from the water system is free of Hazardous Substances (B) Indemnity. Lessee will indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to City and hold harmless City and its officers, agents and employees (each such person and entity being referred to as an "Indemnified Person") from and against all losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, claims, litigation, demands, defenses, costs, judgments, suits, proceedings, damages (including consequential damages), disbursements or expenses of any kind (including attorneys' and experts' fees and expenses and fees and expenses incurred in investigating, defending, or prosecuting any litigation, claims, or proceeding) that may at any time be imposed upon, incurred by, asserted, or awarded against City in connection with or arising from or out of: (1) any Hazardous Substance, on, in, under, or affecting all or any portion of the Water System or the groundwater caused or released by Lessee, excluding any unknown pre-existing Hazardous Substance or any Hazardous Substance released, generated or disposed by City; (2) any material breach of any covenant or agreement of Lessee contained or referred to in this Section relating to Hazardous Substances for which Lessee is responsible under this Lease; (3) any violation or claim of violation by Lessee of any Laws; or (4) the imposition of any lien for the recovery of any costs for environmental cleanup or other response costs relating to the release or threatened release of Hazardous Substance, excluding any unknown pre-existing Hazardous Substance or any Hazardous Substance released, generated or disposed by City. The expiration or termination of this Lease and/or the termination of Lessee's right to possession will not relieve Lessee from liability under any indemnity provisions of this Lease as to matters occurring City of Cupertino Page 22 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) or accruing during the Term by reason of Lessee's occupancy of the Water System and the groundwater. 3.12 Water Supply. The Water System is supplied with water pursuant to the SCVWD Contract. Lessee will not modify or take water supply wells serving the Water System out of permanent service without the express written permission of the Director. Lessee will purchase water pursuant to and comply with requirements of the SCVWD Contract and will immediately notify City if any provision of the SCVWD Contract is violated by Lessee. 3.13 City Access. City and City's agents have the right to enter the Water System at any time in the case of an emergency, and otherwise at reasonable times and on reasonable prior notice for the following purposes: (i) to determine whether the Water System is in the condition as required by this Lease and whether Lessee is complying with its obligations under this Lease, (ii) to serve, post, or keep posted any notices required or allowed by Laws or under this Lease, and (iii) as City may otherwise reasonably deem necessary. In connection with any City access, City shall (i) comply with Lessee's reasonable safety rules, (ii) not unreasonably interfere with or adversely impact Lessee's operations, Maintenance, Repair or Capital Improvement Project activities; and (iii) be liable for any damage to the Water System arising out of such access or City actions. 3.14 City Inspection and Oversight. Lessee, upon written request of City or City's agent providing reasonable notice, will permit City or City's agent to conduct a comprehensive inspection of the Water System, including, but not limited to, field inspections; Maintenance and Repair records and reports; Customer complaint records; and Capital Improvement Projects, schedules, and plans, in order to assess the condition of the Water System. In connection with any City inspection and oversight, City shall (i) comply with Lessee's reasonable safety rules, (ii) not unreasonably interfere with or adversely impact Lessee's operations, Maintenance, Repair or Capital Improvement Project activities; and (iii) be liable for any damage to the Water System arising out of such access or City actions. Article 4 — Customer Rates and Billing 4.1 Customer Rates. Lessee, in its sole and exclusive discretion, will be responsible for setting, levying, and providing notice of any and all of the Rates that Lessee will require for water service to be delivered to the Customers. Notwithstanding City of Cupertino Page 23 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) the foregoing, City reserves the right to impose and collect fees for new or expanded water service connections on the Water System, including connection fees and development impact fees. (A) Regulatory Cap. The Rates levied by Lessee on Customers must not exceed the lowest cumulative rates, surcharges, surcredits and other service charges or fees and penalties approved and/or authorized by the CPUC and in effect on Lessee's CPUC regulated water system located in the City ("Regulatory Cap"). The Parties agree that this Regulatory Cap affords Lessee with sufficient flexibility to establish Rates while ensuring the Customers are subject to just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory Rates. The Regulatory Cap does not include the "Surcharge to Fund Public Utilities Commission Reimbursement Fee," an administrative fee imposed by the CPUC tariffed systems. (B) Modifications. Lessee will notify City of any proposed modifications to Lessee's Rates at least 30 days prior to their effective date and provide documentation to demonstrate that the proposed Rates will be at or below the Regulatory Cap. (C) Compliance. City, acting in its regulatory capacity, may confirm that Lessee is in compliance with this Article. In the event of a discrepancy, City may request additional information for clarification, which Lessee must provide within 15 business days. If, in City's reasonable determination, Lessee's Rates exceed the Regulatory Cap and Lessee cannot demonstrate that its Rates are in compliance, City may direct Lessee to revise its Rates to achieve compliance with this Article, and to further require that Lessee provide a refund and/or credit to Customers equal to the difference between the Rates charged and the revised Rates. (D) City's Rights. Provided that Lessee is in material compliance with this Article, City will have no authority or obligation to impose, set, modify, approve, or provide notice of the Rates levied by Lessee on Customers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City reserves the right to impose and collect fees for new or expanded water service connections on the Water System such as connection fees and development impact fees. (E) CPUC Orders. If the rates used to establish the Regulatory Cap are reduced or increased by order of the CPUC, Lessee will reduce or increase its Rates consistent with the CPUC order. City of Cupertino Page 24 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) (F) City's Facilities. No charge will be made for water delivered to fire department facilities or for firefighting activities in the City. All other City properties using water service will be charged the same Rates as other Customers. (G) Water Rationing. In the event of mandatory water rationing imposed by Laws, Lessee will impose water conservation measures or mandatory water rationing on its Customers and, if required by Laws, will provide timely education and if needed, proactively assess penalties on Customers that violate such Laws. 4.2 Customer Billing and Collections. Lessee is solely responsible for submitting billing statements to and collecting all Rates and taxes from Customers for water received through the Water System. Lessee may propose payment and credit rules substantially similar to those imposed on customers of its CPUC-regulated tariffed water system in the City. City will have no responsibility for billing or collecting Rates from Customers. Lessee will retain the proceeds from all Rates for water services provided during the Term of the Lease. (A) Utility Users Tax. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at all times during the Term, Lessee will, at its sole expense, bill and collect from Customers on behalf of City any additional amounts which City, in its regulatory capacity, may assess as a utility users tax on any Customers and will promptly pay all such amounts to City. (B) Unpaid or Delinquent Accounts. Lessee is solely responsible for the collection of unpaid or delinquent Customer accounts, at Lessee's sole expense. City will have no responsibility for collection of unpaid or delinquent Customer accounts. (C) Transition Periods. With respect to Customer payments for water services provided prior to the Effective Date of the Lease, Lessee will cooperate with City to determine the amount payable to the prior lessee pursuant to the 1997 Lease and will promptly tender payment of that amount as specified by the Director. With respect to payments due for water services provided prior to expiration or termination of the Lease, Lessee will cooperate with City to determine the amount payable for such services prior to expiration or termination of the Lease, and the Director will arrange for payment of that sum to Lessee. (D) Survival. The provisions of this Section will survive expiration or City of Cupertino Page 25 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) termination of the Lease. Article 5 - Insurance and Indemnity 5.1 Insurance. During the Term of this Lease, Lessee, at its own cost and expense, will maintain insurance, issued by a carrier or carriers acceptable to City, as set forth in this Section. (A) Policies and Limits. The following insurance policies and limits are required for this Lease: (1) Commercial General Liability ("CGL"). Commercial general liability insurance in the single limit amount of not less than $10,000,000 which amount may be satisfied by any excess liability insurance carried by Lessee, written on an occurrence basis. Such insurance shall include coverage for injury (including death) or damage to persons and/or property arising out of the operations of Lessee pursuant to this Lease. The policy will include coverage for liability assumed under this Lease for personal injury, property damage and all other insurable claims as an "insured contract" for the performance of Lessee's indemnity obligations under this Lease. (2) Workers' Compensation Insurance. Workers' compensation insurance, or a certificate of self-insurance, insuring against liability under the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Act now in force in the State, or any act hereafter enacted as an amendment or supplement thereto or in lieu thereof. Such insurance will fully cover all persons employed by Lessee in connection with its operations under this Lease for claims of death or bodily injury arising in connection with their employment by Lessee pursuant to its operations under this Lease. (3) Automobile Liability Insurance. Automobile (vehicle) liability insurance on an occurrence basis for bodily injury and/or property damage in a single limit amount of not less than $2,000,000. (4) Pollution Liability Insurance. Pollution liability insurance on a claims made basis, providing coverage of at least $2,000,000 for all liability arising out of sudden, accidental and gradual pollution and remediation, and loss City of Cupertino Page 26 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) arising out of claims for bodily injury, death, property damage, or environmental damage caused by pollution conditions. (5) Cyber Liability Insurance. Cyber liability insurance with limits of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage must be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations of Lessee under this Lease, including, but not limited to, claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion, and network security. The policy must provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties, and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations. (B) Endorsement. Lessee's CGL policy, automobile liability policy, pollution liability policy, and Cyber liability policy must contain an endorsement in favor of City and its officers, agents and employees listing them as additional insureds. (C) Review. The Parties will periodically review the required insurance for the purpose of mutually agreeing on increases in the minimum limits, which may be reasonable and customary for similar facilities of like size and operation. (D) Insurers. All insurance must be affected under policies issued by insurers of recognized responsibility, licensed or permitted to do business in the State, and with an AM Best rating of A.VII or otherwise as mutually agreed between the parties. (E) Cancellation or Changes. All policies of insurance issued by the respective insurers must provide that such policies will not be canceled or materially changed without at least 30 days' prior written notice to Lessee and to City. Evidence of all renewed or new policies, together with evidence of payment, will likewise be deposited with City prior to expiration dates of expiring or non- renewed policies. (F) Minimum Limits. The limits of insurance required by this Lease or as carried by Lessee will not limit the liability of Lessee nor relieve Lessee of any obligation under this Lease. City of Cupertino Page 27 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) (G) Waiver of Subrogation. Lessee will cause the general liability and worker's compensation insurance policies obtained by it to provide that the insurance company waives all rights of recovery by way of subrogation against City in connection with any damage covered by any policy. 5.2 Indemnity. To the full extent permitted by Laws, Lessee will indemnify, defend with counsel proposed by Lessee and acceptable to City, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against all liability, loss, claims, obligations, penalties, demands, suits, litigation, legal or administrative proceedings, defenses, proceedings, judgments, damages (including consequential damages), expenses, costs (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and fees of litigation and its threat) of any kind or nature, including any challenge to the validity of this Lease or any portions thereof (collectively, "Liability") to the extent arising out of or in connection with Lessee's negligent acts or omissions or willful breach of this Lease during the Term in relation to this Lease, including, but not limited to, Liability arising from any failure by Lessee to comply with Laws or the requirements of this Lease. While Lessee's indemnity and defense obligations are immediate, in the event that Liability is determined to be caused in whole or in part by the concurrent negligent or intentional wrongful acts or omissions of an Indemnified Person, then (i) the Liability shall be comparative; and (ii) each Party shall indemnify the other to the extent that such Party's negligent or intentional wrongful acts or omissions were the cause of such Liability; and (iii) Lessee shall not be responsible for any comparative Liability relating to the negligent or intentional wrongful acts or omissions of an Indemnified Person. The obligations in this Section will survive expiration or termination of this Lease with respect to any Liability arising during the Term of the Lease. If this Lease or any portion hereof is declared invalid, each Party waives any claim it may have against the other in connection therewith. Article 6 — Default, Termination, and Expiration 6.1 Default. If City determines that Lessee is in default of any of the material provisions of this Lease, City will notify Lessee in writing of the default and afford Lessee a reasonable opportunity to cure the default unless immediate action is required due to an emergency that threatens imminent danger or injury or death to persons or damage or destruction of property. City of Cupertino Page 28 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) (A) Default. The occurrence of any of the following constitute a default by Lessee: (1) If Lessee fails to operate, Maintain, or Repair the Water System or any portions thereof in accordance with this Lease, where such failure continues, or Lessee has not diligently commenced reasonable steps to cure such failure for 14 days following receipt of written notice from City specifying the failure or such other time specified in the written notice. (2) If Lessee fails to make any payment to City or to any third party required by this Lease as and when due, where such failure continues for 60 days following receipt of written notice from City specifying the failure. (3) If Lessee fails to obtain and maintain any insurance coverage required by this Lease, where such failure continues for seven days following receipt of written notice from City specifying the failure. (4) If Lessee materially breaches or fails to perform any of its other covenants or agreements in this Lease, where such breach or failure continues, or Lessee has not diligently commenced reasonable steps to cure such failure, for 14 days following receipt of written notice from City specifying the failure or such other time specified in the written notice. (5) Lessee's financial capacity to operate the Water system is impaired in any of the following manners: (a) Lessee is or becomes bankrupt or insolvent or makes any general arrangement or assignment for the benefit of creditors; (b) Lessee becomes a "debtor" as defined in 11 U.S.C. section 101 or any successor statute thereto (unless, in the case of a petition filed against Lessee, the same is dismissed within 90 days); (c) a trustee or receiver is appointed to take possession of substantially all of Lessee's assets or of Lessee's interest in this Lease and possession is not restored to Lessee within 60 days; or (d) if a writ of attachment or execution is levied on, or there is a judicial seizure of, substantially all of Lessee's assets or of Lessee's interest in this Lease and such seizure is not discharged within 60 days. (B) Notice and Cure. Upon receipt of written notice of default from City, if Lessee's default is not cured or Lessee has not diligently commenced reasonable steps to cure the default within the time period specified in such written notice of default, City of Cupertino Page 29 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) then City may at its option, avail itself of any remedies listed below, which are non-exclusive and cumulative with. any remedies now or later allowed by Laws or provided for elsewhere in this Lease: (1) City's Right to Cure Lessee's Default. In the event of a default by Lessee, if Lessee is not taking prompt and reasonable efforts to cure the default, following the time specified in the written notice to Lessee, City may elect to cure the default at Lessee's cost, provided that Lessee has not provided City notice that it will need additional time to cure the default, unless immediate action is necessary to ensure uninterrupted operation of the Water System. Lessee will promptly reimburse City for its costs. (2) Emergency Corrective Action. Notwithstanding any provision of this Section to the contrary, if a default or failure to perform by Lessee poses an immediate threat to public health, safety, or property, City will notify Lessee, and if Lessee fails to take corrective action within the time specified in such notice, City may take all necessary action at Lessee's expense, including Maintenance of or Repairs to the Water System or portions thereof. Lessee will promptly reimburse City for its costs. (3) Lessee's Right to Possession Not Terminated. In the event of a default by Lessee, if Lessee is not taking prompt and reasonable efforts to cure the default, following the time specified in the written notice to Lessee (which shall be no less than the time periods set forth in Section 6.1(A) (Default)), City may take control of the Water System and relet the Water System and the groundwater, or any part of it, to third parties on Lessee's account. Lessee will be liable immediately to City for all reasonable costs City incurs in reletting the Water System and the groundwater. Reletting may be for a period shorter or longer than the remaining Term of this Lease. Lessee will pay to City any amounts due under this Lease on the dates such amounts are due, less the rent or other amounts City receives from any reletting. No act by City allowed by this paragraph will terminate this Lease unless City notifies Lessee that City elects to terminate this Lease. (4) Termination of Lessee's Right to Possession. In the event of a default by Lessee, if Lessee is not taking prompt and reasonable efforts to cure the default, following the time specified in the written notice to Lessee (which shall be no less than the time periods set forth in Section 6.1(A) (Default)), City of Cupertino Page 30 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) City may elect to terminate Lessee's right to possession of the Water System and the groundwater. No act by City other than giving formal written notice to Lessee pursuant to this paragraph will terminate this Lease. Acts of Maintenance, efforts to relet the Water System and the groundwater or the appointment of a receiver on City's initiative to protect City's interest under this Lease (other than the appointment of a receiver to perform all of Lessee's obligations hereunder) will not constitute a termination of Lessee's right to possession. On termination, City has the right to recover from Lessee any amount necessary to compensate City for all actual damages directly caused by Lessee's default. (5) Interest on Past Due Amounts. (i) If City, at any time, by reason of Lessee's default, pays any sum or does any act that requires the payment of any sum, the sum paid by City will be due immediately from Lessee to City at the time the sum is paid, and if not paid within 15 days of notice, will bear interest at the rate of the 90-Day AA Financial Commercial Paper Interest Rate, from the date the sum is paid by City until City is reimbursed by Lessee. (ii) If payment of any undisputed amount from City to Lessee is made after the 30th day following the proper submission of an undisputed and properly completed invoice, then payment shall include interest on the amount owing, at the rate of the 90-Day AA Financial Commercial Paper Interest Rate, from the 301h day after the payment was due until the date of payment. (6) Survival. The provisions of this Section will survive expiration or termination of the Lease. (7) Consequential Damages. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws, except as otherwise specified in this Lease and excluding claims associated with patent infringement or intentional breach of confidentiality requirements, neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for punitive damages or Consequential Damages. (8) Limitation of Liability. Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary City of Cupertino Page 31 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) herein, Lessee's aggregate liability under this Lease to the City shall not exceed an amount equal to the Annual Investment Rent in the prior 12 month period. 6.2 Termination of Lease for Convenience. The City may terminate the Lease for convenience prior to the expiration of the Lease upon ninety (90) days written notice to the Lessee. The amount of Lessee's payment obligations with respect to the Annual Investment Rent, pursuant to Section 2.5(B) (Annual Investment Rent), and Franchise Fee, pursuant to Section 2.5(C) (Franchise Fee) will be prorated based on the effective date of the termination for convenience. Following a termination of the Lease for convenience, City shall pay to Lessee all pro -rated amounts (including a pro -rated reimbursement of the Concession Fee based on the remaining term of the 12-year initial term of the Lease) owing under the Lease at the time of such termination for convenience. Lessee shall also be entitled to compensation for all work performed on or prior to the effective date of the termination for convenience, including work on Capital Improvement Projects. Lessee's obligations under the terms of this Lease, including any amendments hereto, will remain in full force and effect through the effective date of the termination, unless otherwise specified in the termination notice. 6.3 Termination by Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease for cause, by declaring a breach should City fail to comply with any material provisions of this Lease. City shall be deemed in breach of this Lease if it fails to comply with any material provision of the Lease, including but not limited to failure to make payments in accordance with the Lease. Lessee shall provide City with reasonably prompt written notice setting forth in sufficient detail the reasons for the written notice declaring it believes that a breach has occurred. City shall have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of the written notice declaring the breach (or such longer period as the Lessee may grant in writing) within which to cure the alleged breach or such longer period determined by Lessee if the breach is not curable within that time period. Upon such termination, Lessee shall be entitled to receive payment for work executed, and reasonable costs incurred by reason of such termination on the same basis as for a termination for convenience. 6.4 Surrender Upon Expiration or Termination. Upon expiration or termination of the Lease, Lessee agrees that it will surrender to City the Water System in in a state of repair that is consistent with the applicable Operating Standards. Within 30 days following expiration or termination of the Lease, Lessee will provide City City of Cupertino Page 32 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) with an updated Water System map (ArcGIS or equivalent), the accuracy of which Lessee cannot provide verification to the extent information was or is provided by City or third parties or to the extent of changes of such information with the passage of time, showing spatial location of all surface and subsurface assets including all asset types, age, diameter and to the extent known by Lessee. This Section will survive expiration or termination of the Lease. 6.5 Transition Period. Lessee will reasonably cooperate with, and not take any affirmative actions to hinder in any way, City's efforts to operate, lease, or sell the Water System. All records required under this Lease will be made current by the Lessee at the frequency previously defined or as reasonably requested by City. All Customer billing information will be kept current and provided to City during the last 12 months of the Term. 6.6 Dispute Resolution. If a dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or relating to this Lease, including its formation, validity, binding effect, interpretation, performance, breach, or termination (a "Dispute") arises between the Parties regarding interpretation or implementation of the terms and conditions of this Lease, including the exhibits hereto, the representatives of the Parties who have primary responsibility for operation of the Water System and administration of this Lease will engage in best efforts to resolve the Dispute informally. If the Parties are unable to resolve a Dispute informally, the Party seeking redress may submit an informal written claim to the City, specifying the nature of the claim, the applicable Lease provisions, a summary narrative of the events leading to the claim, and the remedy, sought to resolve the claim. Within 30 days thereafter, the Director will arrange to meet and confer in person or by videoconference with Lessee, in a further attempt to informally resolve the claim. If, within 30 days following the initial attempt to meet and confer, the claim is not resolved, the Parties agree to submit the Dispute to mediation with an experienced third -party neutral in an effort to resolve the claim by compromise, with each Party to share equally in the mediator's fees and each Party to bear its own legal fees, if any. City and Lessee will mutually agree to a mediator selected in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). Mediation will be scheduled to ensure the mutual availability of the selected mediator and all of the individuals that each Party requires to represent its interests. The Parties will share the costs of the mediation equally. Good faith compliance with the informal Dispute resolution provisions set forth in this Section is a condition precedent to filing a claim pursuant to the California City of Cupertino Page 33 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) Government Code or to otherwise initiating legal proceedings with regard to the Dispute. The provisions of this Section will survive expiration or termination of the Lease. Article 7 - Miscellaneous Provisions 7.1 Recitals. The Parties agree that the recitals to this Lease are true and correct and are hereby made part of this Lease. 7.2 Notice. Any notice required by or given pursuant to the Lease, including notice of any changes to the contact information in this Section, must be in writing and sent to the other Party by U.S. Mail or a reliable overnight delivery service, with postage prepaid and return receipt requested. For the convenience of the Parties, copies of Notices may also be given by email to the email address given below. Notice is deemed effective on the date of delivery shown on the receipt or date of delivery of the email. A copy of any notice given to the City must also include simultaneous transmission of a PDF copy of the notice to the Director. Notice for each Party must be given as follows, unless a different address is later designated for such purpose by written notice to the other Party: City: City of Cupertino, City Clerk 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Email: cityclerk@cupertino.gov Copy to: Director of Public Works (via email) Lessee: San Jose Water Company Attention: John Tang 110 W. Taylor Street San Jose, CA 95110 408-279-7933 Email: John.tang@sjwater.com 7.3 Compliance with Laws. Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, Lessee will, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, diligently and in a timely manner, comply in all material respects with all Laws. Lessee shall notify City in writing (with copies of any documents involved) of any threatened or actual claim, notice, inquiry, City of Cupertino Page 34 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) citation, warning, complaint or report with respect to which it obtains knowledge pertaining to or involving any alleged failure by Lessee to comply with any Laws in its operation of the Water System. 7.4 Nondiscrimination. Discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons in the leasing, transferring, use, or enjoyment of the Water System, on account of sex, race, color, creed, national origin, ancestry, religion, citizenship status, age, marital status, medical condition, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, veteran status or any other characteristic protected by Laws is strictly prohibited. Lessee must comply with all applicable Laws prohibiting discrimination. Lessee cannot establish or permit any practice of discrimination or segregation. 7.5 Force Majeure. (A) Force Majeure Event. Lessee's obligations under this Lease will be suspended only to the extent that and only for the duration in which the performance of its obligations is prevented or hindered by acts of nature; war; epidemic or pandemic; riots; civil insurrection; acts of civil or military authority taken to protect public health and safety; fires; floods; earthquakes or other natural phenomena; labor strikes, accidents or incidents; change in law or standards; or other cause of the same or other character which are beyond the reasonable control of Lessee ("Force Majeure Event"). (B) Notice. In the event of a suspension due to a Force Majeure Event, Lessee will promptly notify the City in writing of such suspension and the cause and estimated duration of such suspension. Lessee will be excused from fulfilling its obligations under the Lease only to the extent that the Force Majeure Event has prevented Lessee from fulfilling its obligations, and only until such time that the Force Majeure Event has ceased to prevent performance or other remedial action is taken, at which time Lessee will promptly notify City in writing of the resumption of its obligations under this Lease. If Lessee is unable to fulfill any of its obligations by reason of a Force Majeure Event, Lessee will exercise due diligence to reasonably remove such inability within a reasonable time period and to mitigate the effects of the Force Majeure Event. The relief from performance will be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is required by the Force Majeure Event. City of Cupertino Page 35 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) 7.6 Assignment. Lessee may not assign its rights or obligations under this Lease, in part or in whole, or sublet the Water System or any portion thereof, without City's written consent. City agrees to provide consent where such assignment relates to an upstream reorganization or transfer of direct or indirect interests in Lessee so long as no change occurs in the entity with ultimate power to direct or control or cause the direction or control of the management of Lessee. 7.7 Governing Law and Venue. This Lease will be governed by California law and venue will be in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, and no other place. Lessee waives any right it may have pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 394, to file a motion to transfer any action arising from or relating to this Lease to a venue outside of the County. 7.8 Waiver. City's waiver of a breach by Lessee of any term, covenant or condition contained in or granted by this Lease will not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition hereof. 7.9 Integration. This Lease, including the exhibits hereto, which are incorporated by this reference, constitute the final, complete, and exclusive terms of the agreement between the Parties with respect to the Lease of the Water System, and supersede all other oral or written provisions. 7.10 Amendment. No amendment or modification of this Lease or any of the exhibits hereto will be binding unless it is in a writing duly authorized and signed by the Parties. Any amendment to the Term or to the provisions of Section 2.5 (Compensation) are subject to City Council approval, with the exception of annual adjustments to the Annual Investment Rent. Amendments to the Capital Improvement Plan, Maintenance Plan, and update of Asset Management Plan are subject to approval by the City's Director without further City Council approval. 7.11 Interpretation. The terms of this Lease have been negotiated by the Parties and the language used in this Lease will be deemed to be the language chosen by the Parties to express their mutual intent. This Lease will be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction against the Party causing such instrument or any portion thereof to be drafted, or in favor of the Party receiving a particular benefit under this Lease. City of Cupertino Page 36 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) 7.12 Severability. If any provision of this Lease is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in part or in whole, such provision or portion thereof will be excluded from the Lease and the remaining provisions of the Lease will remain in full force and effect. 7.13 Execution in Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument. 7.14 Authorization. Each individual signing below warrants that he or she is authorized to do so by the Party that he or she represents, and that this Lease is legally binding on that Party. If Lessee is a corporation, signatures from two officers of the corporation are required pursuant to Corporations Code section 313. [Signature page follows] City of Cupertino Page 37 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) The Parties agree to this Lease as witnessed by the signatures below. CITY OF CUPERTINO By: Date: Paqela Wu, City Manager ATTEST: By: kl�o� Date: Kirsten Squarcia, MMC, City Clerk APPROVEDXV TO q (21+(q-�2-y 9/2�-lzy By: �� Date: Christopher J tsen, City Attorney LESSEE: SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY By: M. 1-6 I Date: 231,14 Tanya Moniz-Wit6president City of Cupertino Page 38 Agreement for Lease of Real Property (Water System) List of Exhibits: Exhibit A — Service Area Exhibit B — Water System Map Exhibit C — Asset Management Plan Exhibit D — Capital Improvement Plan Exhibit E — Maintenance Plan Exhibit F — SCVWD Contract EXHIBIT A Service Area o �Q gt13'�3.LS � n � � A U� O iO� N n D N FOOTHILL !.V o p 7 z 2!0 H122�JJ�k 1,}5 c O cp �• Ail I 0 m PHAR. `1F> A p E DR SANTA TERESA OR 7 m IN WILKSQlVAVE 3 EMANN DR Com1-11AVE cLn Z < <^ BUBB RD p SIN AN" SfG D y A PRQSpfiC Z N y y m b y m p c� �o d Pa 2 < m d��02i30� N ?jG CAS71NEAVE r,Q L y zo rml m D ,,plory f S STELLING RD N STELLING RD l z a z w y'� 0�-' ,m- O BEAR\ON DR 0 POPPY WAY f 00� m 2 4 0CA m EANDLEY DR D � r m m S DE ANZA BLVD N DE ANZA BLVD F Om a1FINlil�- cn 7 TDRRE AVE � i ao OA WIN DSOR ST y' FAPALLONE DR m G LARRYWAi 7 Z LA RANDY LN - 2 }t In 0S 0 j AVE S BLANEY AVE m N < H .� m i t D S m m z Z o ctin i i `ry C z N HE ROry L a ALOarRBF�OOKLN A A E p RVE O L.vyG 1 Q &STAlgslCryHO PERIM �� LARKLy t�(1 FR OR 7 OR cb o • NN C y N WOLFE RD A rr I a m f D � r FINCH AVE �D 2 t�l N o % Vt z _ S TANTAU AVE 14� TAN TAU AVE D JUDY AVE N BRET AVE m 4IQ4Z� STERNAVE — 2�-- } C'{y�C WUNDERLICH DR 0� J CALVERT O f r. ��O,yF iOWNSON AVE "+ "t EXHIBIT B Water System Map FIX EXHIBIT C Asset Management Plan 1101191,3111,11 2019 .• • 1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 What is an Asset Management Plan for Cupertino Municipal Water System?............................................1 1.2 Key Components of the Asset Management Plan........................................................................................2 2 What Does the City Own?.....................................................................................................................................8 3 What is the Replacement Cost of the Assets?....................................................................................................13 4 What is the Current Condition of the Assets?....................................................................................................15 5 How Should the Assets be Prioritized?...............................................................................................................29 6 What are the Recommended Levels of Service?................................................................................................34 6.1 Environmental, Organizational, and Financial Sustainability Levels of Service..........................................34 6.2 Asset Performance Levels of Service..........................................................................................................36 6.3 Customer Service Levels of Service............................................................................................................37 6.4 Regulatory Compliance Levels of Service...................................................................................................38 7 What is Needed to Sustain the Delivery of Services?.........................................................................................40 7.1 Condition and Age Based Analysis.............................................................................................................40 7.2 Level of Service Analysis.............................................................................................................................48 7.3 Efficiency Analysis......................................................................................................................................49 7.4 Analysis Summary......................................................................................................................................50 7.5 10-Year and 20-Year CIP Summary............................................................................................................52 Figure1-1 Asset Hierarchy............................................................................................................................3 Figure1-2 Decay Curve.................................................................................................................................4 Figure1-3 Risk Matrix...................................................................................................................................5 Figure 1-4 Life Cycle Cost Logic Illustration.................................................................................................. 6 Figure 1-5 IRIS (Infrastructure Reinvestment Intelligence System)..............................................................7 Figure 3-1 Replacement Cost of Mains, Valves, Hydrants, and Meters.....................................................13 Figure 3-2 Water Distribution Facilities Replacement Cost........................................................................14 Figure 4-1 Condition Profile for the Water System Condition Profile........................................................15 Figure 4-2 Condition Profile for Water Mains, Water Services, Meters, Hydrants, Interties, and Others. 15 Figure 4-3 2019 Pump Station, Reservoirs, and Wells Condition Profile....................................................16 Figure 4-4 Water Main Installation by Decade ................................................. .......................................... 16 Figure 4-5 Water Main Installation History by Decade...............................................................................17 Figure 4-6 Valve Installation Profile by Decade..........................................................................................20 Figure4-7 Valve Condition Profile.............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4-8 Hydrant Installation Profile by Decade......................................................................................21 Figure 4-9 Hydrant Condition Profile..........................................................................................................21 Figure 4-10 Water Service Installation Profile by Decade..........................................................................22 Figure 4-11 Water Service Condition Profile at 50-Year Useful Life...........................................................23 I<AYUGAs01-UT ION Figure 4-12 Water Service Condition Profile at 65-Year Useful Life............................................................................23 Figure 4-13 Water Service Condition Profile at 80-Year Useful Life............................................................................24 Figure 4-14 Water Meter Installation Profile by Decade.............................................................................................25 Figure 4-15 Water Meter Condition Profile.................................................................................................................25 Figure 4-16 Mann Pump Station Condition Profile......................................................................................................26 Figure 4-17 Storage Tanks Condition Profile...............................................................................................................27 Figure 4-18 Flowering Pear Well and Franco Court Well Condition Profile.................................................................27 Figure5-1 Water Main CoF Scores..............................................................................................................................30 Figure5-2 Asset Criticality Profile................................................................................................................................32 Figure5-3 Risk Matrix..................................................................................................................................................33 Figure 7-1 Water Distribution Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile (100 Years).........................................42 Figure 7-2 Water Distribution Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile (20 Years)...........................................43 Figure 7-3 Total 20-Year Condition -Based Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile by Asset Type ............................43 Figure 7-4 Water Distribution Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile (10 Years)...........................................44 Figure 7-5 Total 10-Year Condition -Based Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile by Asset Type ............................44 Figure 7-6 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Mains...........................................................................................45 Figure 7-7 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Mains — Probabilistic...................................................................46 Figure 7-8 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Services and Meters....................................................................46 Figure 7-9 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Services and Water Meters — Probabilistic.................................47 Figure 7-10 10-Year Water Consumption Trend..........................................................................................................48 Figure 7-11 Long -Range Water System Needs - Condition/Age, Level of Service, and Efficiency — 100 Years ...........50 Figure 7-12 Long -Range Water System Needs - Condition/Age, Level of Service, and Efficiency — 20 Years .............51 Figure 7-13 Long -Range Water System Needs - Condition/Age, Level of Service, and Efficiency — 10 Years .............51 Tables Table1-1 Asset Classes..................................................................................................................................................3 Table 1-2 Condition Assessment Score and Description...............................................................................................4 Table 2-1 Water Distribution Asset Inventory...............................................................................................................8 Table 2-2 Water Main Inventory by Material................................................................................................................9 Table2-3 Water Main Inventory by Size.......................................................................................................................9 Table 2-4 Mann Pump Station Asset Inventory...........................................................................................................10 Table 2-5 Storage Tank Asset Inventory......................................................................................................................11 Table2-6 Well Asset Inventory....................................................................................................................................12 Table 3-1 Water Facility Total Asset Replacement Cost..............................................................................................14 Table 4-1 Water Main Useful Life Scenario Summary.................................................................................................19 Table 4-2 Water Service Useful Life Scenario Summary..............................................................................................24 Table 4-3 Mann Station Assets in Need of Replacement or Rehabilitation.................................................................26 Table 4-3 Flowering Pear Well and Franco Court Well Assets in Poor Condition........................................................28 Table5-1 Water Main CoF Scoring..............................................................................................................................30 Table 5-2 Water Distribution CoF by Asset Class.........................................................................................................31 Table 5-3 Water Facilities CoF by Asset Class..............................................................................................................31 Table 6-1 Level of Service Importance Ranking...........................................................................................................34 Table 6-2 Environment, Organization, and Financial Sustainability Levels of Service.................................................35 Table 6-3 Asset Performance Levels of Service...........................................................................................................36 Table 6-4 Customer Service Levels of Service..............................................................................................................38 Table 6-5 Regulatory Compliance Levels of Service....................................................................................................39 Table7-1 Management Strategies...............................................................................................................................40 KAYUGASOL UTION . Table 7-2 Water Management System R&R Summary................................................................................................45 Table 7-2 20-Year Water Main R&R Summary .............................................................................................................46 Table 7-4 20-Year Water Services and Water Meter R&R Summary ...........................................................................47 Table 7-10 Level of Service CIP Recommendations.....................................................................................................49 Table 7-11 Efficiency CIP Recommendations...............................................................................................................50 Table 7-12 Long Range Water System Needs Summary ..............................................................................................50 Table 7-13 2019 to 2028 CIP Summary .......................................................................................................................52 Table 7-14 2029 to 2038 CIP Summary .......................................................................................................................53 Appendices Appendix A: Asset Inventory of Pump Station, Storage Tanks, and Wells Appendix B: Hydraulic Analysis Report Appendix C: SJWC 2015 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study KAYU GA SOLU TI ON ,. Introduction The City of Cupertino (City) is working to investigate its water system. The City is served by three different systems: one owned and managed by California Water Service Company, one owned and managed by San Jose Water Company (SJWC), and one owned by the City. The City's water system is currently being operated and maintained by SJWC. This service is part of a 25-year concession between the City and SJWC that began in 1997. The City's water system covers approximately 3.7 square miles and has nearly 60 miles of pipelines, 3 storage tanks, and just under 4,400 water services. Before the end of the concession agreement with SJWC in 2022, the City will need to gain a thorough understanding of its water system to assist them in the decision in the following business cases: • The City takes over the operations, maintenance, management and customer interactions of the water system • The City negotiates and renews the concession agreement with the lessee responsible for all operation and customer interaction responsibilities, and the City establishes a defined capital expenditure schedule for system improvements that is paid by lessee • The City negotiates and renews the concession agreement with a lessee that is responsible for all operation and customer interactions, and the City establishes a defined capital expenditure schedule for system improvements to be paid by City • The City sells the City -owned water system In an effort to help the City make an informed business decision, the City has contracted Kayuga Solution and its team (i.e., Hanson Associates, Charles Marr Consulting, MR Valuation Consulting) to perform comprehensive water system asset planning and valuation. The goal of the project is to develop an asset management plan that provides a comprehensive understanding of the current and future asset needs, asset risk profile, appropriate levels of service, cost to provide that level of service, and financial and resource requirements to sustain the delivery of those services. The asset management plan will provide an understanding of the City's current and future infrastructure needs for the water system assets. As system conditions change in the future, a periodic re -inspection and update of this asset management plan is recommended. 1 A What is an Asset Management Plan? An asset management plan is a long-range planning document that provides a framework for understanding the assets owned by the City, services it provides, risks it assumes, and financial investments it requires. Development of an asset management plan requires answers to the following questions: • What does the City own and manage? • What is the current state of the assets? • What are the immediate asset maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement needs? • What are longer -term asset investment needs with respect to aging assets, capacity, level of service, etc.? • What is the risk associated with asset failure? • What are the appropriate levels of service? • What is required to sustain the delivery of service? o Financial requirements o Resource requirements KAYUG^SC)l u r ions 1 o Risk vs. investment analysis • What is the cost of service? An asset management plan is a living document. It is meant to grow and change with the organization and system for which it is written. With new and/or replaced assets, an asset management plan should be updated periodically to reflect the asset risk profile and continually monitor the financial plan required to sustain the delivery of services. Key Components of an Asset Management Plan The following section introduces and defines the key components and methodology used to develop the asset management plan. Asset Register The asset register establishes the data foundation of the asset management plan by consolidating and documenting all assets owned and managed. The development of the asset register required establishing the following key elements: • Asset Definition — Helps to define what is an asset versus what is not an asset. With the asset definition established, the City is able to separate assets from components and manage them accordingly. • Asset Hierarchy— Organizes the thousands of assets in the asset register. With the asset hierarchy, the City is able to easily find assets and support asset management decisions at any level within the asset hierarchy. • Asset Classes — Groups the assets to allow the City to characterize the life -cycle behavior of the assets in the register. An asset class is developed by grouping assets with similar characteristics, such as type, function, useful life, material, and size. Asset classes are used to help model the life -cycle costs of the assets. • Asset Data Standards — Identifies the data attributes required to support asset management decisions. Asset Definition An asset was established as something that is owned and managed by the City, has a value, and is critical for the delivery of water distribution services. An asset is identified at a level at which a work order is typically generated. The initial step in developing an asset register was to consolidate all previously existing asset data in the various information systems (e.g., Geographic Information System (GIS), Excel spreadsheets, engineering drawings). Once the data was consolidated, a data gap analysis was performed to determine which assets or asset attributes (e.g., size, material) were missing. This data gap analysis provided the foundation for the data collection and correction part of the project. The data gap was filled by visiting the assets and collecting missing assets and missing attributes. Asset Class Assets are grouped into classes to more efficiently model and manage the assets. An asset class generally refers to a group of assets that behave similarly. Grouping the assets into these classes allows easier modeling of life -cycle behavior. The following table lists the City's asset classes. KAVUGASOI...0 I ION Table 1-1 Asset Classes Building HVAC I Main Casing Service Line Control Panel Hydrant Meter Tank i Driveway Instrumentation Motor Valve Fencing Lifting Equipment Pavement Vault Structure Filter Lighting Pump Well Casing -- — -- Generator Main � SCADA Asset Hierarchy • City of Cupertino A Water System The hierarchy for the organization of the assets is presented in the Figure 1-1. . Air Release Valves The assets are organized by City, Water System, and Sub -Systems. Air Release Valves Air Valve Pipe Air Vent Valve Replacement Cost ► Blow Off Valve Fire Hydrants Asset management best practice estimates the future financial needs based Fire Hydrant Pipes on current -year asset replacement cost. In many cases, escalation of the initial Fire Hydrant Valves Fire purchase cost does not properly reflect the replacement cost. As such, each rfi Intertiesrants es asset in the asset register was assigned a replacement cost in 2019 dollars. Line Valves This replacement cost estimates the budget required to replace the asset with Meters Operational Zone Valve a like, in -kind asset. The replacement cost incorporates material, labor, a Pump Station removal, and other costs associated with replacing the asset. It should be i Mann Station noted that the replacement cost does not include any changes to capacity or Discharge Flow Meter Vault Discharge PRV Vault level of service. In addition, the replacement cost does not represent costs ► Pump House associated with delivering a CIP project, which typically include the following: site General Station Flow Meter Vault • Engineering/design/project management Water Tank • Demolition and removal • Reserviors Cristo Rey Storage Tank • Permit A Mercedes Road Station • Contractor overhead/profit Electrical Shed Mercedes Station Tank e1 • Contingency Mercedes Station Tank 02 • Traffic control Site General Sampling Station • General conditions ► Services Typically, an additional 30% to 50% is added to the replacement cost to Water Main Casing Water Mains represent CIP project costs. In the asset management plan, all costs are . Wens represented as replacement cost. The individual replacement costs for the Flowering Pear Well assets are then summed to create a total estimated replacement cost for the Franco Court Well management system. Figure 1-1 Asset Hierarchy KAYUGASOL LIT IOrV 3 Condition Condition is one of the best indicators for estimation of immediate and/or future maintenance, repair, and replacement work. General condition assessment (e.g., visual, touch, sound) was performed for accessible assets. For inaccessible assets, condition was estimated based on age. No forensic or detailed condition assessment work was involved. A condition scale of 1 to 5 (Table 1-2) was utilized to represent the general condition of the asset. Compared to a more complex scale (e.g., 1 to 10, 1 to 100), this simple scale greatly limits the subjectivity associated with the assessment of the condition score from one inspector to another. Table 1-2 Condition Assessment Score and Description 1 Excellent: New or nearly new 2 I Very Good: Not new, but in very good condition 3 Good: Good or as expected based on age 4 Poor: Poor or recommended replacement In near -term 5 Failed/Critical: Failed or nearing failure, needs immediate attention In many cases where the asset was not visible (e.g., buried assets) or the condition could not be determined (e.g., pipes, electrical), age was used as the main indicator of the condition of the asset. Utilizing age and decay curve, the condition of an asset is estimated. The figure below illustrates the various decay curves available to represent the deterioration of assets. It is expected that decaying characteristics of most assets can best be represented by an exponential curve. Kayuga utilized the Late Decay (1.5) curve to estimate asset condition in the City's asset management plan. This curve is widely used by many utilities and municipalities in this geographic area (i.e., Santa Clara Valley Water District, City of Livermore) as it represents a more conservative view of an asset's decay. For example, a linear decay curve of an asset with a condition rating of 3 is estimated to have 63% life consumed. The same asset with the same condition utilizing the Late Decay (2) curve is estimated to have 78% life consumed. 8 2Li.Y. 3fYY, An36 5(P,> ,rr '(N 80% 91f. 1CXN1 Percent of Useful Life Consumed Figure 1-2 Decay Curve K A V U G A S O L.. LJ T I ON -tare Deray (L`) -Late Decay(2) -Late Decay (3) -Late Decay (4) -Late Decay (5) -Linear Deray -Early Decay (0.51 -Early Decay (0.133) - ra, ly Decay (0.25) -Early Dewy (0.2) 4 Risk Risk is used for effective, transparent prioritization of limited resources (e.g., budget, availability of staff). Under limited resources, the City should address the assets with the highest risk scores before addressing the lower -risk assets. The two main components of risk are Probability of Failure (PoF) and Consequence of Failure (CoF). PoF indicates the estimated time until the asset fails to function at the established levels of service. CoF provides an indication of the impact of the asset failure considering the triple bottom line factors of sustainability: economic, social, and environmental. Every asset in the asset register is assigned a risk score. For some assets, redundancy was considered to offset the risk. The following formula is used to calculate the risk score: With each asset's risk score calculated, assets were plotted in the following risk matrix. The risk -based strategy should be to manage the high -risk zone (red zone) before moving down to medium (yellow zone) and low risk zones (green zone). HIGH Probability of Failure LOW LOW Consequence of Failure HIGH Figure 1-3 Risk Matrix Life -Cycle Cost In orderto predict the future replacement and rehabilitation need of all assets, a life -cycle cost analysis is performed. The life -cycle cost analysis is a calculation of costs required to support the set of activities (e.g., rehabilitation, replacement) that are needed to sustain the delivery of an asset's services during the life of an asset or for the planning horizon (e.g., 10, 20, or 100 years). The useful life (e.g., 10, 20, 30 years) was estimated for each asset. Life - cycle cost analysis is performed for each asset in the asset register. For every year of the planning horizon, the life - cycle analysis will calculate which asset needs a refurbishment or replacement activity and how much it will cost to perform the needed activity. As noted previously, replacement costs do not include costs associated with delivering a CIP project (e.g., engineering, project management, contingency, insurance). When all the activity costs are KAVUGASOL U f ION G summed for each year, the overall replacement and rehabilitation budget for the year will be established. The life - cycle cost analysis drives the estimation of the future financial needs to sustain the delivery of the assets. Comparing and contrasting the life -cycle cost results against the current asset replacement and rehabilitation spending, sustainability of the future financial plan can be assessed. Life -cycle cost calculation takes place in the form of a life cycle cost logic or management strategy. A management strategy characterizes the life -cycle behavior of an asset (e.g., how it will decay, how long it will last, necessary refurbishment during the life of the asset, when refurbishment is needed, how much refurbishment will cost). Every asset is assigned a management strategy. The following figure illustrates the relationship between asset condition, management activities, and life -cycle cost. After the installation, asset condition will deteriorate with time. In order to raise the condition to an acceptable level, an investment in the form of maintenance or rehabilitation will be required. At the end of its useful life, the asset will need to be replaced, and the cycle will repeat. 5 -Paned Li Fe Cycle Maintemrrr }Aaln�nan¢ A h hihatlon Figure 1-4 Life Cycle Cost Logic Illustration Year The life -cycle cost assessment allows the City to proactively manage the assets. The City will be able to predict which assets are nearing the end of useful life and proactively plan for replacement of high -risk assets to prevent failure. Reacting to a high -risk asset failure after they have occurred typically results in the highest expense. With life -cycle cost analysis, the City will also have an understanding of the work and investment required for future years and proactively plan ahead to minimize risk and costs. These estimations will be used to prepare the budget and resources required to sustain the delivery of services. When budget and resource limitations exist, the City will be able to prioritize the needs by risk to ensure the budget is first spent on high -risk assets. In essence, the City will be able to ensure that minimum funds are spent to maximize risk reduction. IRIS (Infrastructure Reinvestment Intelligence System) Life -cycle cost calculation can be very tedious and time consuming. It is especially difficult when the calculations need to be performed for thousands of assets, year -by -year, asset -by -asset. For this reason, the City utilized Kayuga Solution's asset management planning tool, IRIS (Infrastructure Reinvestment Intelligence System), which incorporates the developed asset register and performs the life cycle cost and risk assessment work. IRIS is an asset management dashboard that utilizes the asset data and performs asset management calculations and analyses presented in the City's asset management plan. It is a planning tool the City can use to project the _-,-, — 1<AYU GA SCII ll � ICIN _.. �... A future maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement needs, understand its high -risk assets, understand the cost of ownership, calculate the appropriate budget required to mitigate the high -risk assets, and identify assets estimated to require rehabilitation or replacement year -by -year, asset -by -asset. The figure below illustrates a sample view of the IRIS dashboard. Asset Hierarchy Main Welarrhy s a ar a<'la.. van<a Ai, Vent valve I 31w OH WM a rre HyEranla Line val Masers Operauowl Zane VeHe Y vumP SIaHPn e Rvrervwrs Sampling SuOPn a $ervicM Vrt1w Main Caslry YA1e Maim a Wells 2ona VaM Alternate Hierarchy Y,nlsl„ecmmlanng ra ftj- Mngernal CPa rvrpl W E—n GWrY E—n ArW„b MaY.amre laaiW ucr,yrrm Can Sur ryC ar'boav 5' IA. or/Cones Puo C.a6 was rR&v R:sYl Woh 9„Y-�g Kvv.YyPh RCOA Lbs 0.wYRR9nln IMP furN+gAWy,is _ _..` City of Cupertino Msk:.41�?. , )'n`°'4Cvr`_i• rri....i -.1;t?:,.: f:-.: d`.Jas 1 s,.�d:ean A,T,:x.m RnR oral aearm rYw:�v Ie. nw�s<ill r� m 1DO Years 1954 - 2018 a-�+car .... 591,581,447 $1,661,332 $166,133.226 , Replacement & Rehabilitation (R&R) Ss,ocO,cW —Annual Average �Warer Splan . H.aW oao 52000,000 11.fi6)3)2 II,, w III �' I II I rills. a II d..d III ��aIIOII) II L I ( I (� � II 2015 ZONI 2025 2Q)0 a135 20a0 ZOaS ZO50 HISS ]060 20fi5 2020 }I125 2Dl0 A95 2090 20 P. 2105 1110 111S 2120 a Year Figure 1-5 IRIS (Infrastructure Reinvestment Intelligence System) Long -Range Planning of Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Needs Based on the life cycle cost analysis, the long-range financial needs of asset replacement and rehabilitation profile is generated. Life cycle cost analyses were performed for a 100-year, 20-year, and 10-year horizon to evaluate the replacement and rehabilitation needs of the assets. A 100-year planning horizon provides a comprehensive view of asset replacement; by the 100`h year, each asset (e.g., main, valve, pump) will be replaced at least once within the 100-year planning horizon. Every year, those assets requiring replacement or rehabilitation are identified and summed to generate the replacement profile. KAV U GA SCDI LJ)ICD rV 7 What Does the City Own? As part of the asset management plan development process, a comprehensive asset inventory was performed. All facilities (e.g., pump station, storage tanks, wells) were visited and their assets inventoried. Hydrants and system valves were visited and their location (i.e., GPS coordinate) was recorded. Where assets are not visible (i.e., mains, services, valves), a thorough analysis of as -built drawings and available GIS data was performed. Water main, valve, service, and meter data were initially provided by SJWC. Where the initial GIS data did not match the as -built drawing or on -site verification, Kayuga updated the initial GIS data to provide the City with a more comprehensive and current water distribution asset database. Asset Inventory The City owns 12,244 assets including nearly 60 miles of pipelines and just under 4,400 services. The water system also includes 3 water storage tanks, 2 wells, and a pump station. The following tables summarize the water distribution assets for the Cupertino Leased Area water system. The provided GIS data also included pipes from water main to hydrants and small sections of pipes to blow off and air release valves all identified in the table below. Table 2-1 Water Distribution Asset Inventory Hydrants 399 I Mains (4" to 20" diameter) 1,094 57.6 Main Casing 1 Air Release/Vent Valves 30 1 Blow Off Valves 86 Interties 4 Line Valves 810 Zone Valves 12 Hydrant & Service Valves 455 Hydrant Pipe 400 1.5 Blow Off Pipe 8 > 1 Air Release Pipe 9 > 1 Services 4,382 11.5 Fire Services 29 Meters 4,382 Sampling Stations 8 Interties 4 Total 12,113 70.6 I<AVUGAS(71. UTION 8 Table 2-2 Water Main Inventory by Material AC 33.7 59% _-� Cl 1 1; 2% CIP 0.5 >1% DICL 15.4 27% DICLZ 0.4 >1% FKCL 2.7 5% PVC 0.1 >1% S 1.2 2% WS 0.8 1% WSCL 1.7 3% Total 57.6 100% Table 2-3 Olater Main Inventory by Size Diameter (in) Length (mi) Percent of Total 2 0.6 1 % —� 3 — 0. >1% 4 3.1 5% 6 19.1 33% 8 21 37% 10 5.8 10% 12 3.1 5% 14 1.5 3% 16 0.9 2% 18 1.4 2% 20 0.9 2% Total -- 57.6 100% KAVUGA-�rlI UI ICIN 9 A summary of the facility assets at the pump station, reservoirs, and wells is shown in the following tables. A comprehensive list of assets in each facility can be found in Appendix A. Piping to the facilities is accounted for in the water mains. Note that the PRV at the pump station is accounted for with the valves. Table 2-4 Mann Pump Station Asset Inventory NumberPump Station Asset Class of Assets Mann Pump Station 74 Building 1 Control Panel 8 Fencing 1 Generator 2 HVAC 1 i Instrumentation 6 Lifting Equipment 1 Motor 5 Pavement 2 Pump 5 SCADA 1 Sump Pump 2 Tank 1 Valve 35 Vault Structure 3 KAVUGA501. Ll rION 10 Table 2-5 Storage Tank Asset Inventory Mercedes Road Storage Tanks 1 23 Building _ 1 Control Panel 3 Fencing -- 1 _ -- Generator 1 Instrumentation 2 Pavement 1 SCADA 1 Site 1 Tank 2 Valve 10 Cristo Rey Storage Tank 13 Driveway 1 Fencing 1 Pavement 1 SCADA 1 Tank 1 Valve 7 Vault Structure 1 KAVUGASC)I. U 1 ION 11 Table 2-6 Well Asset Inventory Flowering Pear Well 13 Control Panel 2 Fencing 1 Filter 1 Instrumentation — 1 Motor 1 Pavement 1 Pump T 1 SCADA �1 Valve 3 Well Casing 1 Franco Court Well 12 I Control Panel 1 Fencing 1 Instrumentation 1 Lighting — 1 Motor 1 Pavement 1 Pump 1 SCADA 1 Valve 3 VFD 1 Well Casing 1 KAYUGASC7I U i ION 12 What is the Replacement Cost of the Assets? In total, there are 12,224 assets in the water system. The replacement cost for each asset was estimated. The replacement cost does not represent a project cost that includes engineering, management, insurance, contingency, etc., costs. In many cases, project costs can add an extra 30% to 50% to the replacement cost. The sum of all individual asset replacement costs for the City's water distribution system is approximately $91.6 million in 2019 dollars. The assets were further distributed into categories based on the asset hierarchy. The sum of all replacement costs for mains, services, interties, valves, hydrants, meters, is approximately $79.0 million. Water Mains, Water Main Casing, $10,000 Sendces, $23,875,944 Figure 3-1 Replacement Cost of Mains, Valves, Hydrants, and Meters K AY GA SCII L11 ION —Zane Valve. $16.300 Release Valves, $44,537 Air Vent Valve, $7,000 ow OH Valve, $176.995 .e Hydrants, 52,562,960 - Interties, $60.000 Line Valves, S1*1,000 --Meters, $4.829,065 )nal Zone Valve, $4.700 npling Station, $16.000 13 The sum of all asset replacement costs (Figure 3-2) in the pump station, storage tanks, and wells totaled $13.0 million. Table 3-1 provides a summary of replacement costs by facility. It should be noted that a replacement cost does not equal CIP project cost. CIP projects cost can typically be 30 to 50 percent more than replacement cost estimate. -- ——Wells, $1,511,530 Reserviors, $8,668,394 Pump Station, $2,339,655 Figure 3-2 Water Distribution Facilities Replacement Cost Table 3-1 Water Facility Total Asset Replacement Cost Facility Replacement Cost Cristo Rey Storage Tank $ 3,182,190 Mercedes Road Station $ 5,486,204 Mann Pump Station $ 2,339,655 Flowering Pear Well $ 746,275 Franco Court Well $ 765,255 KAVl3GASOI ll i ION ® Pump Station, $2339.655 Reserviors, $8.668.394 Well , $1.511,530 Total: $12519,579 14 What is the Current Condition of the Assets? Condition is one of the best indicators for estimation of immediate and/or future maintenance, repair, and replacement work. During the asset inventory process, the condition of each visible asset was assessed and recorded utilizing the condition assessment scale introduced in Table 1-2. It should be noted that main objective of the condition assessment process is to highlight assets in poor and failed condition (i.e., Poor, Failed/Critical). These poor -condition assets will be included in the 20-year CIP recommendations (Chapter 7). Where assets are not visible, age was used as the main indicator of the condition of the asset. When installation information was not available, assumptions were made based on neighboring assets or nearby developments (e.g., construction year of neighboring houses). There is a possibility that the mains were installed long before parcel development; however, the actual installation year was unknown. In some cases, the historical record of water main break data was utilized. Where the work report indicated the cause of the main break was due to corrosion, aging pipe, or poor condition, the condition score of the pipe segment where the water break occurred was updated to reflect the poor condition. '1'.1 System Level Condition Profile High-level condition profiles are provided below. These high-level profiles will be followed by specific asset analysis in the following sections. k e n nC Sze s67 oos Water System (Total) Figure 4-1 provides an overview of the estimated current condition of the water system. This condition profile includes all assets. It is estimated that about 6% of all assets fall under Poor to Failed/Critical condition. The sum of replacement cost of these assets equates to about $12.6 million. Water System (Water Mains, Water Services, Meters, Hydrants, Interties, and Others) The estimated current condition profile for water mains, water services, valves, hydrants, meters, interties, and others assets are shown in Figure 4-2. Approximately 6% of the assets are identified in poor and failed/critical condition. The total replacement cost of these assets is about $8.8 million. KAYUGASC71 tJ T IC)N '. Very Good: 524,900.424 Good.- 120,240,664 Poor S11696,020 Failed/Cmical 51,157.334 Total. $91.581447 Figure 4-1 Condition Profile for the Water System Condition Profile hk Excellent 37% Very Good 43% ® Good: 14% Poor 5% Ik Failed/Critical: 1% Figure 4-2 Condition Profile for Water Mains, Water Services, Meters, Hydrants, Interties, and Others 15 Water System (Pump Station, Reservoirs, Wells) Figure 4-3 provides an overall condition profile for pump station, reservoir, and well assets. At these facilities, approximately 23% of the assets are identified as Poor or Failed/Critical condition. The total replacement cost of these assets is about $4 million. Details of assets in need of replacement or rehabilitation will be discussed in the following sections. Asset Level Condition Profile Excellent 3% b Very Good: 20% Good: 54% Poor 23% Failed/Critical 0% Figure 4-3 2019 Pump Station, Reservoirs, and Wells Condition Profile Key representative asset level condition profiles are presented in the following sections. The condition profiles are either represented as current percentage of Poor and/or Failed/Critical assets or as replacement needs for the next 10 years. Water Mains The following installation profile shows the decade the water mains were installed or last replaced. When installation information was not available, assumptions were made based on neighboring assets or nearby developments (e.g., construction year of neighboring houses). The oldest water mains were estimated to have been installed in the 1950s and 1960s. The following figure presents the age by decade of the water mains with respect to total length. It is estimated that about 38% of the water mains are now over 50 years old. It should be noted that older pipes may potentially exist in the City. According the City's Lease Water System Inspection Technical Report', the City has a logbook that dates the water mains back to 1916. It stated that the City's water system was originally constructed in 1916 and then expanded in 1938 and 1950s. Unfortunately, no historical as -built drawings could be found to verify this claim. The oldest pipe in the GIS data showed to be constructed in the 1950s. Figure 4-4 Water Main Installation by Decade SPF Water Engineering, "Final Technical Report: Leased Water System Inspection," 2017. KAYUGASVC)l �LJ `1 IC]N 16 The figure below provides a map of the water main installation profile by decade. �` � c o 1w1 ley ti Iluil 2 Wit «� e Water Main Installation .... .- ...._ Decade - P - 1950, - 1960, I - 1970a tII ... .-. . -19606 ••.•� - ,�� `" :� swu� tr "[v( Cron++e wrn.OUM.JaasMr •. {.f/eg�u 4v 4Cwwl4 m Am, f�, YE kPN . - _yam_ .. qw ...u,awnex,..M i,. as u.w or•b+/ Figure 4-5 Water Main Installation History by Decade Estimates of pipe useful life play a key role in the asset management analysis for underground pipelines. According to a comprehensive study conducted by Utah State Universityz on water main break rates in the USA, the average age of failing water mains is approximately 50 years old. This number is well below what is usually recommended by most of the pipe manufacturers. The study also found that the break rate of asbestos cement (AC) pipe significantly increased by 43% after reaching 50 years of age. The study concluded that AC pipe installed in the 1960's may be near its end of life. In addition, the study indicated that an average expected life of a newly installed pipe is 84 years. Typical new installation pipe materials included ductile iron (DI), PVC, HDPE, concrete steel cylinder (CSC), polyvinyl chloride (PVCO), and steel. A similar study conducted by the US EPA stated that post World War II cast iron (Cl) pipe average service life is about 75 years. The US EPA study provided the following expected service lives for different pipe materials: • AC pipe 15 inch or greater— 85 years • AC pipe 4 inch or smaller — 40 years • DI pipe — 87 years • Reinforced concrete pipe — 140 years • Concrete — 130 years • Cl pipe — 75 years Z Folkman, Steven. "Water Main Break Rates in the USA and Canada: A Comprehensive Study." Utah State University Buried Structures Laboratory (2018). 3 "Primer on Condition Curves for Water Mains." US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-13/080 (2013). I<AYUGASC71 IJ r ION 17 In addition, a recent study by the Sustainable Solutions4 stated that the following useful lives • PVC pipe -100 years • DI — 50 years • HDPE — 50 years Multiple water main useful life scenarios were developed and modeled to gain understanding of anticipated water main replacement needs for the next 10 years. Careful analysis of the scenario results can yield a better understanding of future water main replacements. Scenario 1— US EPA Useful Lives A simulation of expected water main replacements was performed utilizing the US EPA pipe useful life presented above. For those pipe materials not identified by US EPA, a useful life of 84 years was used. This number is based on the Utah State University research presented above. Based on this analysis, it is expected that 10-year water main replacement will be about $1.4 million or about 3%of the total water mains. This value represents the pipes currently identified in the leak data to be in poor condition. Scenario 2 — Conservative (100-Year Useful Life) This scenario provides a conservative look at the water main pipe replacement needs. All pipes were assigned a 100- year useful life. From the water main data, the earliest water main installation recorded in the City was 1954. With a 100-year analysis, the earliest water main replacement will in the mid-2050's, out of the 10-year water main replacement window. Similar to Scenario 1, the 10-year water main replacement is expected to be about $1.4 million (3%) for the replacement of identified poor condition pipes. Scenario 3 —Aggressive (65-Year Useful Life) This scenario is developed to represent the worst -case scenario. All pipes were assigned a useful life of 65 years. In reviewing the water leak work data, the representative age of all pipes identified as structurally in poor condition was about 65 years. Based on this analysis, it is expected that the city has to replace about 17% of the total water mains worth $7 million. Scenario 4 — Hybrid (65-Year Useful Life for AC Pipes and US EPA Useful Lives for Other Pipe Materials) This hybrid scenario was designed to provide a more representative view of the City's water main replacement needs. As indicated in Scenario 3, the representative age of water mains identified to be poor condition was 65 years. Closer review of poor condition water mains revealed that they are mostly asbestos cement (AC) pipes. In this scenario, all AC pipes were assigned a 65-year useful life while other pipe materials were assigned useful life identified by the US EPA. This assumption is supported by the Utah State University study'. The study revealed that, for AC pipes, the frequency of leaks increased by 43% after 50 years. In another words, after the 50t' year, the AC pipe decay curve (Figure 1-2) rapidly falls, indicating that there is little service life left before failure. A majority of AC pipes in the City were installed in the 1950's, 1960's, and 1970's. Based on this analysis, it is projected that the City will need to spend 4 "Life Cycle Assessment of PVC Water and Sewer Pipe and Comparative Sustainability Analysis of Pipe Materials." Sustainable Solutions Corporation (2017). ' Folkman, Steven. "Water Main Break Rates in the USA and Canada: A Comprehensive Study." Utah State University Buried Structures Laboratory (2018). KAYUCASCII I.JTION 18 about $6.6 million in the next 10 years. This equates to about 16% of the total water mains. Scenario 5 — San Jose Water Company Useful Life This scenario uses water main useful lives recommended by SJWC. According to SJWC, life expectancy is 85 years for AC, 110 years for Cl and 70 to 85 years for WS mains. The remaining mains are estimated conservatively to have a 100-year useful life. Based on this analysis, it is expected that the City has to replace about 4% of the total water mains worth $2.9 million within the next 10 years. Water Main Useful Life Scenario Summary The summary of scenario results is provided in table below. Although it is difficult to predict exactly when the water mains will fail and how much budget is required to replace them, the scenarios provide an expectation between the worst -case and the best -case scenarios. The conservative and aggressive scenarios establish the two extreme numbers. From there, both the hybrid and SJWC numbers incorporate system knowledge in the analysis. From the scenarios, the City may expect to spend about $3 to $6.6 million for water main replacement in the.next 10 years. © US EPA Useful Lives ® Conservative © Aggressive Hybrid San Jose Water Company Valves Table 4-1 Water Main Useful Life Scenario Summary Water main useful life based on US EPA study $1.4 million All water main useful life set to 100 years $1.4 million All water main useful life set to 65 years $7.0 million 65-year useful life for AC pipes and US EPA useful lives $6.6 million for other pipe materials Useful life and replacement cost based on SJWC $2.9 million recommendation Similar profiles were constructed for valves. The following figure shows the installation profile of the water valves by decade. Like with the mains, assumptions were made based on neighboring assets when installation information was not available. Similar to water mains, 31% of valves are over 50 years old. KAYUC^a i"i u r IC)N 19 Figure 4-6 Valve Installation Profile by Decade The figure below presents the condition profile for water system valves (i.e., air release, air vent, blow off, line, zone). It was assumed that the water system line valves would be replaced when the main is replaced. As such, the installation year and useful life were set to be the same as the nearest main. Valves on AC pipes were set to 65 years and valves on other pipe materials were set to US EPA recommended years. Data analysis show that about 10% of the valves are in Poor and Failed/Critical condition. In the next 10 years, it is anticipated that the City will need to spend about $160,000 to replace aging valves. Figure 4-7 Valve Condition Profile Hydrants E-11-1 31% 2 Very Gaod. 33% Good 26% Poor 9 EaiW/C.6.1 1% The following figure presents the installation profile of the hydrants by decade. Like the water mains and valves, some of the oldest hydrants were installed in the 1950s and 1960s. Currently, about 11% of hydrants are expected to be 50 years or older. KAYUGASC)l urICDN 20 Figure 4-8 Hydrant Installation Profile by Decade The figure below presents the condition profile of the hydrants. Useful lives of hydrants have been stated to be anywhere between 40 years to 100 years. A 100-year useful life was used in this analysis as the previous condition assessment work (Technical Report of the Leased Water System Inspection, 2017) revealed the hydrants to be in good condition. In general, hydrants are visible and regularly tested and exercised; as such, hydrant condition tends to be more updated and managed compared to other buried assets. Cities and water providers near Cupertino (e.g., City of Livermore, Santa Clara Valley Water District) also utilized a 100-year life for hydrants. The following condition profile reveals the hydrants to be in good condition or better. E—Hent 84% Very Good: 16% sk Good 0% P-r 0% Failed/Cntiwl: 0% Figure 4-9 Hydrant Condition Profile In the next 10 years, fire hydrant needs were limited to maintenance activities (i.e., testing and paint). During our field visit, numerous fire hydrants that are in need of repaint were identified. It was assumed that a typical per unit cost to sand blast, prime, and paint a fire hydrant is $125. At this rate, the total need for next 10 years was $44,500. No fire hydrant replacement needs were identified. Water Services The following figure presents the installation profile of the water services by decade. Like the mains, there were many services for which the installation year was not available. As such, age assumptions were made based on neighboring assets or nearby developments (i.e., construction year of neighboring homes). Based on these assumptions, approximately 28% of services are estimated to be 50 years old or older. KAYUGASCJI 11 l ION 21 11990s 2000s 8% 6% i 201' 0 I1980s 11 3% a 1%, 7 1970s 1960s1 30% 21% Figure 4-10 (Water Service Installation Profile by Decade Due to a thinner pipe wall, water services typically have shorter service life when compared to water mains. Multiple analyses were performed using varying water service life (i.e., 50-years, 65-years, 80-years) to gain understanding of the expected condition and their resulting budget for replacement. These scenarios were developed based available data analytics and from similar projects from nearby areas (e.g., Livermore). It is important to note that, due to lack of available data, the installation year of water services were estimated to be equal to neighboring assets (i.e., water main) or nearby developments (e.g., construction year of neighboring homes). It should also be noted that, as mentioned in the water main analysis section, that some water mains could be older than shown in the database. According to water service installation data from the past 20 years, over 450 services were replaced since 1997. This equates to about 10% of water services in the City. Further examination of the data revealed that the 53% of the replaced water services were connected to AC water mains where the average age was 43 years old. If water services were installed at the time of water main construction, it can be deduced that useful life of water services is about 43 years. However, since the City is not experiencing daily water service breaks, the scenario analyses of the water service useful life were represented as 50-years, 65-years, and 80-years. Scenario 1— 50-Year Water Service Life An expected useful life of 50 years was used to model the condition of water services. Using a 50-year useful life, it is estimated that about 44% of water services are in Poor to Failed/Critical condition. The total replacement cost of these water services equates to approximately $10.3 million. The Failed/Critical condition water services alone summed to approximately $6.9 million. Failed/Critical condition water services are estimated to have exceeded their expected lives. KAVUGASOL U TIC) 22 Excellent 25% ® Vary Good. 13% Good: 18% Poor. 15% faded/Criticak 29% Figure 4-11 Water Service Condition Profile at 50-Year Useful Life Scenario 2 — 65-Year Water Service Life An alternative analysis was performed using a 65-year useful life. In this analysis, it is assumed that water services will be replaced at the same time water mains are replaced. In the water main discussion above, it was concluded that reasonable expected useful life of an AC pipe is 65 years. As approximately 60% of the City's water mains are AC (Table 2-2), water service useful life was set to 65 years to assume that water services will be replaced at the same time. The following figure shows the water service condition profile based on 65-year life. In this scenario, services in Poor or Failed/Critical condition equated to 12% or approximately $2.7 million dollars. k-b"ilent29_% ® Very Good: 34% Good: 26%_ Poor. 10% Failed/CridcaL 2% Figure 4-12 Water Service Condition Profile at 65-Year Useful Life Scenario 3 — 80-Year Water Service Life Another scenario was developed simulating 80-year useful life for water services. With the earliest water service installation taking place in the 1950's, an 80-year useful life scenario will push any replacement need for the water services out of the 10-year planning window. As expected, no water services were identified to be in Poor or Failed/Critical condition. 1<AYUGASOI UTION 23 E-11-c 39% Very Gaud: 5096 Ok Gook 11% P a 0% Failed/Cr iaL 0% Figure 4-13 Water Service Condition Profile at 80-Year Useful Life Water Service Useful Life Scenario Summary The following table summarizes the water service scenarios. Water service data revealed the average life of the services that have been replaced was 43 years. In addition, the data showed that many services that were replaced were connected to AC pipes, the oldest pipes in the City. As water service pipe walls are thinner, it will be tough for water services to match the life of the water mains. Given this fact, if a reasonable useful life approximation of an AC pipe is 65 years, it will be realistic to assume that water service replacements may reach about $3 million within the next 10 years. Table 4-2 Water Service Useful Life Scenario Summary Scenarios 10-Year Projection 2 3 :0 Water Meters The following figure presents the water meter profile of the services by decade. SJWC practices a 20-year water meter replacement program. In 2009, many of the meters (66%) were replaced. As such, water meters in the leased area are in very good condition. The average age the water meter is 8 years. KAVUGASOL UTIC7N , 24 20005 j 67% j Figure 4-14 Water Meter Installation Profile by Decode The water meter condition profile is provided below. As expected, overall, the water meters are in excellent to very good condition. However, the analysis indicates that there is $36,000 worth of water meters requiring replacement. According to data, these are water meters that were those not replaced in the recent replacement projects. Figure 4-15 Water Meter Condition Profile Facility Condition Profiles Excellent: 32% s , Very Good: 67% R! Good: 0% IVA Poor. 0% Failed/Critical: 1% The following figures give an overview of the condition of the assets at the pump station, storage tanks, and wells. On -site inspection of the facility assets took place. All visible and accessible asset condition is based on visual inspection. For those assets not visible or accessible, the condition of the asset was estimated based on age. Mann Pump Station The following figure provides an overall asset condition profile for the Mann Pump Station. It was noted during inspections that the pump station is aging; original construction is estimated to have taken place in the 1980's. As shown in the figure, many assets have been replaced since original installation and were in good condition. About 18% of the assets, however, were noted to be in Poor or Failed/Critical condition. In particular, the emergency generators and electrical controls were noted to have likely exceeded their useful lives, and the ability of the generators to provide power when needed was questionable. In addition, pump number 3 is aging and is in need of replacement. The estimated total replacement cost of these assets is about $1.1 million. I<^YU GA Llt IC1N 25 Excellent: 5% h Very Good: 4% Good 73% P a 18% Failed/C it,ol- 0% Figure 4-16 Mann Pump Station Condition Profile A comprehensive list of assets requiring replacement or rehabilitation is provided in Table 4-4 below. Table-4-3 Mann Station Assets in Need of Replacement or Rehabilitation Engine -Generator Set, Bus B Engine -Generator Set, Bus A Main Switch Board Automatic Transfer Switch. BIL Motor Control/Disconnect - N Motor Control/Disconnect - N Motor Control/Disconnect - N Motor Control/Disconnect - IV Motor Control/Disconnect - IV Booster Pump #3 Booster Pump#3 Motor i j Flow Meter Vault Sump Pump Security fence Reservoirs railer Mounted) s B otor 1 otor 2 otor 3 otor 4 otor 5 Poor ReplacementCondition $360,000 $360,000 . $100,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 , $30,000 $100,000 $30,000 Poor Poor Poor_ Poor Poor Poor Poor I Poor —� Poor Poor Poor $500 Poor $11,375 Figure 4-17 provides the condition profile for the storage tanks. It should be noted that this condition profile looks only at structural condition; any level of service recommendations (e.g., regulatory, seismic, water demand) will be included in the recommended CIP and future replacement and rehabilitation sections. As shown in the figures, the Cristo Rey Storage Tank is in very good condition as it was constructed in 2000. Mercedes Station Tank #2 was recently rehabilitated in 2018. Mercedes Station Tank #1 is currently out of service as the current water demand KAVUGASOI 1J11CJN 26 does not require it. However, if the water demand increases, Tank #1 will be required again. A full rehabilitation will be required if Tank #1 is to come back on line. In 2018, Tank #2 was rehabilitated for $1.5 million. Rehabilitation of Tank #1 should cost about the same. Cristo Rey Storage Tank Wells Mercedes Station Tank #1 \ Excdlenl0% :1, Very Good: 1W% \ G-10% \ Poor 0% \Faded 0% Mercedes Station Tank #2 \ E.dleet 0% \ Eacelle 0% Very Good: 0% Al Very Gaud 100% \ Good: 0°6 _ \ Gaud 0% \ P_ 100% \ Poor 0% \ Failed: 0% ; 't' \ F.&d yt\.; Figure 4-17 Storage Tanks Condition Profile The condition profile of both Flowering Pear Well and Franco Court Well is presented in Figure 4-18 below. The overall condition of the wells is good as both wells were rehabilitated in 2015. At both wells, assets in need of update or replacement are electrical assets and fencing. The total replacement cost of assets in need is estimated to be about $51,000. Flowering Pear Well \ Ercelle- 0% Very Good: 2396 �+ Gaed: &1% Po 23% \ Failed/Critical0% Franco Court Well Figure 4-18 Flowering Pear Well and Franco Court Well Condition Profile \ Ea«Ilem. o% Very Gaod: 17% ® Goad. 67% \ Poor 17% \ Failed/Critical: 0% A comprehensive list of assets identified at the wells to be in poor condition is provided below. The list is categorized based on on -site visual inspection and age -based estimation. These poor -condition assets will be included in the 20- year CIP recommendations (Chapter 7). K A Y U GA SOL UI ION 27 Table 4-4 Flowering Pear Well and Franco Court Well Assets in Poor Condition Flowering Pear � I Control panel $10,000 Transfer switch $15,000 Fencing $7,875 Franco Court Fencing $3,150 _—$15,000 Motor controller_ I<AVUGA501. U T ION 28 How Should the Assets be Prioritized? In order to prioritize the future needs for the water assets, a risk -based approach that incorporates Probability of Failure (PoF) and Consequence of Failure (CoF) was utilized. 5.1 Probability of Failure The PoF score indicates the projected time until the asset fails to function as intended. PoF was represented by a score of 0 (new or very low probability of failure) to 1 (failed or very high probability of failure). An asset failure is represented by different failure modes (i.e., mortality, capacity, level of service, financial efficiency). For the mortality failure mode, asset condition score or age was the key factor in determination of the PoF score. For water mains, historical main breaks were also incorporated. For the capacity failure mode, hydraulic modeling work was performed to identify any capacity issues in the water system. The results of the hydraulic modeling indicate that the current system is capable of meeting current and future demand. However, field sample testing was lower than the hydraulic modeling capacity. The field results could be due to valve issues, leakage, or other issues; more investigation is required. For more information on the hydraulic modeling, refer to Appendix B. For the level of service failure mode, the need for changes to the system to support the service demand were incorporated in the asset failure. These included water pressure, water quality, regulatory, safety, and emergency concerns. For the efficiency failure mode, low efficiency (e.g., financial, energy) was the key factor for identifying asset failure. 5.% Consequence of Failure The CoF is a numerical measurement of the criticality of the asset, that is, the impact of the asset failure. Where applicable, the impact of failure was assessed with respect to the triple bottom line factors of sustainability: economic, social, and environmental. CoF scores were assigned on a scale of 1 (low criticality) to 5 (high criticality). The CoF is used to help prioritize the asset under limited budget and resources. Prior to the asset management project, SJWC conducted a CoF analysis as documented in the 2015 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study (Appendix Q. The goal of the study was to rank each segment of the water pipeline from the highest to lowest consequence of failure. The following consequences were considered during the CoF evaluation: • Health and Safety o Potential water quality hazards due to contamination infiltration o Potential for injury due to flooding o Disruption to critical facility operations • Transportation o Disruption to traffic along high traffic volume roads • Business o Disruption to businesses • Systems Operations KAYUGA5C)l U 1 ION 29 o Water supply shortage due to transmission main damage o Water system facility disruption due to critical pipeline damage Based on the principles of asset management, the CoF methodology was concluded to be sound. The CoF scores for the water mains were incorporated into the asset management study. In some cases, the water main IDs had changed since the 2015 study. These changes are likely due to water main replacement. Where possible, the score from the study was applied to the new pipe ID; where the new and old pipe IDs could not be reconciled, the score from the neighboring pipe was applied. In order to make the main CoF scores consistent with facility asset CoF scores, the scores and ranking from the 2015 study were normalized to the 1 to 5 scale as summarized in the following table. Table 5-1 Water Main CoF Scoring 1 to 106 10% 8% 22% 5 4 --- 3 2 1 — 107 to 212 10% 213 to 530 32% --' 33 % 531 to 760 761-1061 22% 27% 26% 27% The following figure illustrates the CoF scores for the water mains. Valves along the water mains (e.g., line valves, blow off valves, air release valves) were given the same CoF score as the highest-CoF main to which it is attached. Water Mains COF I Figure 5-1 Water Main CoF Scores ICAYUG.>soL urloru 30 The remaining water distribution asset CoF scores are shown in the table below. As hydrants provide critical emergency services, they were given a CoF score of 5. Water meters and services were given scores based on size. The greater the disruption a water service failure would cause, the greater the economic consequence of a failure. Fable 5-2 Water Distribution CoF by Asset Class Hydrant 5 i Hydrant Valves and Pipe 5 Interties — 5 — iMeters and Services >_ 4 in 4 Meters and Services between 1.5 and 3 in 2 Meters and Services <_ 1 in 1 The following table shows the CoF scores forthe water facility assets. Facility assets were given CoF scores based on their importance to the overall facility's ability to function. As such, many of the major mechanical and electrical assets (e.g., pumps, motors, emergency generator, MCC) were given high CoF scores. Table 5-3 Water Facilities CoF by Asset Class Tank 5 Flow Meter 4 Motor � 5 Level Sensor �i 4 Pump 5 Pressure Transmitter 4 Generator 5 Intrusion Alarm 4 SCADA 5 Sump Pump 4 Vault Structure 5 Building 3 Well Casing 5 Strainer 3 Gantry Crane 3 Level Switch 5 Level Transmitter 5 Driveway/Pavement 2 Local Control Panel 4 Exhaust Fan 2 Transfer Switch 4 �— Valve 2 Breaker Panel 4 Fencing 1 Main Switch Board 4 Lighting 1 L Disconnect Switch 4 KAVUGASOI I J I ION - 31 The following figure summarizes the percentage of critical assets. Figure 5-2 represents the asset criticality profile for all assets. Using the CoF assessment methodology summarized above, about 14% of all water system assets are considered to be critical (CoF >_ 4). CoF=1, Count=8,579----- - -- - - Figure 5-2 Asset Criticality Profile Ris'< Count=1,481 4, Count=242 3, Count=650 CoF=2, Count=1,292 The following figures show the resulting overall risk profiles for the water system. This profile incorporates both the Probability of Failure (PoF) and Consequence of Failure (CoF) scores to prioritize the assets. The assets in the red zone of the risk matrix are the highest risk assets. Under limited resources, assets in the red zone should take priority over others in terms of being replaced. There are 26 high -risk assets with a total estimated replacement or rehabilitation cost of approximately $3.8 million. These assets are composed of water mains, water distribution system valves, water services, emergency generators, and tank rehabilitation at Mercedes Road. It should be noted that, as mentioned in Section 4.3, that Mercedes Station Tank #1 is currently not operating as the current water demand does not require it. However, if the water demand returns to historical level (3 MGD), Tank #1 will need to be operating again. More discussion on the need of Tank #1 will be provided in the CIP section (Chapter 7) of this report. The high -risk assets will be included in the 20- year CIP recommendations. The 148 assets in the medium risk (yellow zone) include water mains, water services, fire hydrants, and others. Under ideal conditions, all assets would be replaced as they reach PoF 1 at the top of the matrix; the replacement should be prioritized based on risk (red, yellow, and green). IGAYUGASOL. UTION 32 09 08 07 06 N 0 06 3 04 a 0.3 0.7 01 2 Consequence of fatlure Figure 5-3 Risk Matrix IGAYUCGASOL L3 T ION 33 ri What are the Recommended Levels of Service? Levels of service are performance indicators expressed as specific, measurable outcomes with defined time constraints. Service levels support priorities expressed in strategic plans, budget objectives, and policy -maker direction. The City should use levels of service to describe a commitment to service delivery, sustainability and risk management, asset performance, and regulatory compliance. Service levels are measured on a regular basis to learn where the organization is meeting or exceeding its goals and where improvement is needed. Service levels also indicate the level of effort and likely costs the agency must incur to meet its goals. The International Organization for Standardization in its Asset Management Guidelines (ISO 55002:2014(E)) note that defining service levels help ensure that the organization's assets are meeting the needs of customers and other stakeholders. In order to develop levels of service for the City's water distribution system, four categories of indicators should be considered: 1. Sustainability - Sustainability topics will include minimizing the environmental impact of water operations, providing adequate financial resources for operations and capital needs, and maintaining a data -driven, effective organization. 2. Asset Performance - The asset performance section will identify actions required to obtain maximum performance and value from the community's investment in infrastructure. 3. Customer Service - The customer service category will address rate payers' expectations for product quality and reliability and for responsive, effective assistance from water organization employees. 4. Regulatory Compliance - Regulatory compliance will call out the responsibilities of the water agency to remain in compliance with the elements of the California Water Resources Control Board (WRCB) permit, state laws, and water regulations. The tables below contain 51 level of service measurements recommended for the City. The indicator's level of importance is ranked on the following scale. Table 6-1 Level of Service Importance Ranking Rank Description 3 Critical 2 Important 1 L Useful The measurements that matched AWWA "Benchmarking Performance Indicators for Water and Wastewater (2016 Edition)" are accompanied by the AWWA's benchmark numbers represented as high, median, and low percentiles of performance. Management and policy -makers often use these indicators to monitor performance and track the movement in the set direction. 6. 1 Environmental, Organizational, and Financial Sustainability Levels of Service The following table presents the recommended sustainability level of service to ensure stability by minimizing impact on the environment, maintaining an effective, productive organization, and ensuring that current and future financial obligations will be met. I�AVUGASCII ll I I�_�I`.I ��- - 34 Table 5-2 Environment, Organization, and Financial Sustainability Levels of Service Capital expenditures or funds 2.8% of NPV of pump station Auditor attests 3 2.80% 1.50% 0.60% reserved for pump station and rehabilitation / replacement i annually storage rehabilitation I cost replacement Capital expenditures or funds 2.5% of NPV of well Auditor attests 3 2.5% 1.5% 0.3% reserved for well rehabilitation / rehabilitation / replacement annually replacement cost Capital expenditures or funds 2.1% of NPV of distribution Auditor attests 3 2.1% 0.9% 0.5% reserved for main and service piping rehabilitation / annually line rehabilitation / replacement replacement cost Auditor attests 3. Set billing rates at levels that Rates provide adequate support both routine operations funding for operations, current annually and planned capital capital projects, and reserve replacement and rehabilitation. funds as established by system Adjust rates annually. policy -makers Employees maintain required 100% Quarterly 3 certification levels review of training and Monitor and reduce water loss testing records <_ 4% AW WA water 2 3.3 5.9 14.3 audit software Keep employee turnover rate <_ 5% Human 2 5.8% 6.8% 9.6% low resources director attests Maintain at least a 2-day supply 4.86 MG System records 2 in storage based on average annually and production for the previous 5 adjusted by the years UWMP 2 High risk assets receive priority Funding for high risk asset Biennial policy- funding in replacement and replacement /rehabilitation not maker review of rehabilitation program less than 85% of planned work asset risk assessment and CIP Management reviews and Annually Adopt and regularly revise 2 standard operating procedures approves Increase annually use of 5% increase year over year System records 1 recycled water for irrigation and annually other non -potable uses year overyear 1<^IrU G A S CJI U f ICJN 35 Reduce electrical power costs > 2% Power bills and 1 year over year and increase records of local alternative energy sources and power fuels. generation quarterly. Fuel consumption records quarterly Per capita use does not exceed Customer billing 1 Per capita water use steady to declining a rolling two-year average records 1 successful application every 3 Application 1 Make maximum use of grants and zero interest rate loans to years history support the water system Annual review Rating agency 1 Maintain at least a high-grade bond rating ` Employees rate workplace as >_ 85% Biennial survey 1 excellent or good 6.2 Asset Performance Levels of Service From piping to pumps, a distribution system is asset -centric. The ability of underground and above ground assets to function properly facilitates delivery of potable water to customers. Establishing asset performance measurements will give management and policy -makers the guideposts needed to keep the organization's physical assets functioning at desired levels. A complete asset inventory, including criticality, will be instrumental in planning and executing preventive and corrective maintenance. Identification of critical assets and careful assessment of risk, updated routinely, will assure that limited resources are directed toward assets with the highest impact and probability of failure. Table 6-3 Asset Performance Levels of Service What We .. Our Standard How We Measure Level AW`WA Performance 75th Percentile indicators Median 25th Percentile High risk system valves 2 99% Maintenance records 3 exercised annually quarterly review >_ 20% Maintenance records Low risk system valves 2 exercised annually quarterly review Hydrants tested 20% per year Maintenance records semi- 3 annual review Capital purchase and Asset inventory and 100%of assets 3 criticality database up to identified and maintenance records date criticality assessed reviewed annually Asset failures analyzed, z 99% Maintenance records 2 and follow up actions annual review completed K^YUc.asoi urion 36 What We .. What's Our Standard How We Measure Level AWWA Performance 75th Percentile Indicators Median 25th Percentile Asset operation and >_ 99% Maintenance records 1 maintenance costs fully annual review tracked Operate a mechanical, Failures and impaired Report performance and 3 electrical, performance decline replacement of equipment instrumentation and year over year. Non- in program semi-annually structural preventive compliant equipment maintenance program replaced for all assets valued at $5,000 or critical to system operation Maintenance records Tank cleaning and 100% 3 inspection every 5 years including corrosion control Maintenance records Main or service line z 95% 1 breaks repairedwithin 6 hours Adopt and revise a five- Policy -makers Annually 2 year capital approve plan and improvement plan that revisions. Review reflects asset criticality progress. Maintenance records 2 Testing of large meters Large meters — or aging meter groups annually Aging meters — 20% annually Conduct a leak detection Water loss declines Management report to 3 program to reduce water year over year by at policy -maker annually. loss and identify failing least 5%. Failing pipe sections segments identified and prioritized for repair or replacement 5 6 3 6 13 25 Breaks or leaks per 100 Maintenance records miles distribution pipe Maintain and update Biennially Management reports to 2 system risk assessment policy -makers 6.3 Customer Service Levels of Service Customer service indicators describe the actions the organization will take to ensure the satisfaction of the rate payers and consumers. These levels of service set out markers for staff and decision -makers to guide individual interactions, community outreach and information availability, and the quality and reliability of the product. 1<AVUGASC31 U I ]C]N 37 Table 6-4 Customer Service Levels of Service Answer phone calls 90% of calls Phone system records 1 promptly answered within 20 monthly 4 seconds Total hold time >_ 1 minute Phone system records 3 0.6 1 2 monthly/ annual customer survey Phone system records 2 Percent of calls 3.6% 3.6 6.5% 10.6% abandoned monthly Customer records Water quality complaints 3 1.7 4.1 10.5 per 1,000 customers Customer requests >_ 98% Customer management 2 resolved within 1 software monthly/annual business day customer survey Notice and outage records 2 Minimum notice of 24 >_ 98% hours for all planned quarterly shutdowns Minimum notice of 15 >_ 85% t ' Notice and outage records 1 minutes for all quarterly unplanned shutdowns Amount of time water is 99.90% Outage records quarterly 3 available to all customers Unplanned outages per 1.38 Outage records quarterly 3 0.51 1.38 2.89 year per 1,000.customers Customers able to use >_ 90% Annual customer survey 2 desired payment methods for water bills Customers able to use Z 95% Annual customer survey 2 desired tools to learn about water system activities and issues Customers rate water 1 >_ 90% Annual customer survey 3 t service excellent or good AWWA stakeholder I >_ 90% 1 Management review 1 2 1 92% 1 67% 1 42% outreach program checklist 6.4 Regulatory Compliance Levels of Service Regulatory compliance is required by provisions of federal and California law and by orders and resolutions of the I<AYU GA SCJI LJ rIC)N� 38 State Water Resources Control Board, California's primary water regulator. The indicators in this section highlight the actions necessary to reliably deliver high -quality and safe drinking water, meet community fire flow demands, and secure future water supplies. Table 6-5 Regulatory Compliance Levels of Service What We .o What's Our Standard How We Measure Level AWWA Performance Indicators Percentile Median Percentile Remain in compliance with all 100% WRCB 3 100% ' 100% 100% permit requirements Provide fire flows required by 100% Annual testing in 3 SCCFD conjunction with flushing program Urban Water Master Plan Every 5 years Management presents 3 completed results to policy - makers Maintain backflow prevention All devices tested and in Test records. Location 3 program in compliance with compliance. All program and required Title 17, Code of Regulations requirements met improvement reports. Annually. Maintain 0.2 free chlorine in 100% Sample testing records 3 distribution system Complete sanitary survey for Every 5 years Management presents 3 well sites results to policy - makers, Maintain system pressure >_ 95 % Maintenance records 2 between 40 and 70 PSI Flush system annually to Maintenance records 2 100% of dead ends and maintain water quality low flow areas; 33% of other mains ICAVUGASCJI LJ I ICJN 39 What is Needed to Sustain the Delivery of Services? The next step in the asset management analysis is to investigate the current and future asset replacement and rehabilitation needs. The future needs of the water system were evaluated based on the following methods: • Condition and Age • Level of Service • Efficiency The condition and age -based analysis focuses on the physical mortality of the assets, including when the assets need replacement and how much it will cost. The level of service analysis investigates the current system's ability to continue delivery of services, including capacity and safety. The efficiency analysis evaluates the system for any efficiency recommendations. 7,1 Condition and Age Based Analysis In order to estimate the long-term asset replacement and rehabilitation needs in terms of physical mortality, a life - cycle cost analysis was performed for each asset. As described in Section 1.2 of this report, each asset class was assigned a life cycle cost logic or management strategy (e.g., useful life, decay curve, rehabilitation activities) that includes the rehabilitation and replacement activities to best characterize the life cycle investment needs for the asset. The estimated useful life is based on industry standards/reference documents (e.g., AWWA, Water Research Foundation, US EPA, Utah State University) or similar projects nearby the City (e.g., City of Livermore, Santa Clara Valley Water District). Assets in condition 4 or 5 that fail within the planning horizon are included in the long-term replacement needs. The following table summarizes the management strategies. Table 7-1 Management Strategies Blow Off Valve Water Main - AC Water Main - DI Water Main - CI Water Main - I FCKL, PVC, or WS Water Main Casing Line Valve, Connected Main Water Service Meter Sampling Station Fire Hydrant 40 65 87 75 84 84 Same as Main 65 20 100 100 — - — Rehabilitation (Paint) 15 $300 KAYUGAICII UI ICJN 40 Mann Pump Major 30 30% of cost Replace 15 $21,000 Station Building rehabilitation roofing Breaker Panel 30 Control Panel 30 Disconnect 15 Switch VFD 15 Exhaust Fan 20 Fence 20 Flowmeter 20 Gantry Crane 15 Generator 30 Intertie 100 Intrusion Alarm 15 Level Sensor 10 Level Switch 10 Level Transmitter 10 I Lighting 30 Motor 20 Rehabilitation 10 25% of replacement cost Pavement- 80 Rehabilitation 20 25% of Asphalt replacement �- cost Pavement - 80 Rehabilitation 20 25% of Concrete replacement cost Unpaved Road Rehabilitation 2 25% of replacement cost Pressure 10 Transmitter Pump 40 Rehabilitation 20 25% of i replacement cost SCADA 15` Strainer 15 Sump Pump 10 ICAYUGASC)t U I ICIN 41 Mann Suction I 115 Drain and 7 ; $10,000 Tank inspection Reservoir Tank Rehabilitation 35 $ 500,00 Drain and 7 125 $10,000 (e.g., paint) j i I 0 inspection 30 Transfer Switch Facility Isolation 50 Valve Facility Check 35 Valve Facility Air 25 Release Valve Vault Structure j 100 The following figures show the long-range asset replacement and rehabilitation needs for the water system assets. Three planning horizons were utilized: 100 years, 20 years, and 10 years. A 100-year analysis provides a visualization of full replacement of all assets in the water distribution system (e.g., water main with 100-year life). For planning, a 20-year view provides a closer outlook of any upcoming spikes. A 10-year horizon will provide a more detailed information on what assets are anticipated to fail in the near future. 100-Year R&R Analysis The result of a 100-year life cycle analysis is provided below. The total asset replacement and rehabilitation needs for the next 100 years is estimated to be $164.9 million. The average annual asset replacement and rehabilitation need is approximately $1.6 million in 2019 dollars. Inflated costs were not calculated as the long, 100-year, horizon exponentially increases the total replacement and rehabilitation sum. In addition, the City will never plan based on a 100-year planning horizon. In the first couple of years, most replacement and rehabilitation needs are for water mains, valves, services, and meters; the overdue replacements include water services that are estimated to need replacement and recommended replacements at the facilities (e.g., emergency generators). $6,000.000 $4,000,000 $2.000,000 $0 uo�uuou�uuuo�uuu.�ouuu�u�us�ouuuuuu�uuuuuuu un��unn�n�u������ 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 2075 2080 2085 2090 2095 2100 2105 2110 2115. 2120 Year Figure 7-1 lNoter Distribution Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile (100 Years) KAYUCASCJL U 1 IC)N 42 20-Year R&R Analysis In addition, a 20-year replacement and rehabilitation analysis was conducted. The total replacement and rehabilitation need for the next 20 years is $37.1 million. The average annual needs over a 20-year horizon is approximately $1.9 million per year. SOMOW $2.000.000 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year Figure 7-2 Water Distribution Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile (20 Years) The following graph provides a closer look at Figure 7-3 by summarizing the 20-year age and condition -based needs by asset class or location. Note that level of service recommendations will be covered in the next section. Over the next 20 years, it is anticipated that water mains ($17.3 million), water services ($9.2 million), Mercedes Road and Cristo Rey reservoirs ($2.1 million), and Mann pump station ($2.4 million) will be the biggest needs. Water Mains, $17,376,126 Wells, $273,338 Services, $9,244,742 Reserviors, Pump Station, 0 nan sin' 1 $2,379,383 Air Release Valves, $3,857 Blow Off Valve, $154,250 Fire Hydrants, $233,100 Line Valves, $509,600 FMeters, $4,8295 Figure 7-3 Total 20-Year Condition -Based Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile by Asset Type The bulk of the R&R needs over the 20-year horizon for reservoirs is for Mercedes Road Station. These activities include the electrical building and system replacement, generator installation, tank rehabilitation/inspection, site rehabilitation, and replacement of various instruments and valves. KAYUGA=C1 �. I 11-11 43 The future R&R over the 20-year horizon for Mann Pump Station includes generator replacement, pump and motor assembly replacements, tank rehabilitation/inspection, and building and site rehabilitation. 10-Year R&R Analysis The analysis was repeated using a 10-year horizon to project the short-term needs. The total replacement and rehabilitation need for the next 10 years is $13.8 million. The average annual needs over a 10-year horizon is approximately $1.4 million per year. $3,000,000 $2,000,000 st000,000 EO 2020 2025 Year Figure 7-4 Water Distribution Asset Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile (10 Years) The following figure presents a more detailed look of Figure 7-5 by summarizing the 10-year age and condition -based needs by asset class or location. Note that level of service recommendations will be covered in the nextsection. Over the next 10 years, it is anticipated that water mains ($6.7 million), water services ($3.0 million), Mercedes Road and Cristo Rey reservoirs ($1.9 million), and Mann pump station ($1.6 million) will be the biggest needs. Wells,- $127,831 Water Mains, $6,660,642 Services, $3,046,800 7Airease ir alves, $857 Blow Off Valve, $137,735 Fire Hydrants, $114,300 Line Valves, $140,200 Meters, $93,330 Pump Station, Reserviors, $1,563,345 $1,919,460 Figure 7-5 Total 10-Year Condition -Based Replacement and Rehabilitation Profile by Asset Type The bulk of the R&R needs over the 10-year horizon for reservoirs is for Mercedes Road Station. These activities include the electrical building and system replacement, generator installation, tank rehabilitation/inspection, site rehabilitation, and replacement of various instruments and valves. KAYUGASC.3I U1 IC)N 44 The future R&R over the 10-year horizon for Mann Pump Station includes generator replacement, pump and motor assembly replacements, tank rehabilitation/inspection, and building and site rehabilitation. R&R Analysis Summary The following table summarizes the annual average for the different replacement and rehabilitation analyses. Table 7-2 Water Management System R&R Summary 100-Year $165 million $1.6 million 20-Year $37.1 million $1.9 million 20-Year with 3% Inflation $50.9 million $2.5 million 10-Year $13.7 million $1.4 million 10-Year with 3% Inflation $15.5 million $1.5 million The following figures provide a closer look at when major replacement needs are projected for the water mains, water services, and water meters. Water Mains The following figure presents the projected water main replacement for the next 20 years. As discussed previously, a large portion of the water mains are aging and are estimated to need replacement in the near future. In particular, AC mains estimated to have been installed in the 1950's and 1960's will are estimated to need replacement. In the next 20 years, approximately $17.4 million worth of mains are estimated to need replacement, with an annual average need of approximately $869,000. $2,000,000 51,000,000 { s0 ' 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year Figure 7-6 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Mains An additional analysis was conducted on the future main replacement needs using a probabilistic method. In this analysis, some mains are projected to fail earlier than their expected useful lives, while others are expected to fail later. Using this projection method, $9.4 million worth of mains are estimated to need replacement in the next 20 years, with an annual average of $468,000. 1<AYUGASC)I UTIC)N 45 $900,000 $600,000 $300,000 $o 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 Year Figure 7-7 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Mains —Probabilistic The following table compares the water main replacement analyses. The actual water main replacement needs will likely fall between the two analyses. Table 7-3 20-Year Water Main R&R Summary 20-Year $17.4 million $869,000 20-Year, Probabilistic $9.4 million $468,000 Water Services and Water Meters Replacement profiles of water services and water meters are presented below. Due to their shorter lives, it is projected that the greatest near future asset replacement needs will be water services and water meters. As shown in the figure below, approximately $14.1 million worth of services and meters will need replacement in the next 20 years, with an annual average of $704,000. $3.000,000 S2.000,000 S1,000,000 $703,690 y 71 so 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year Figure 7-8 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Services and Meters KAYUGASC)I U-I IC7N 46 An additional analysis was conducted on the future water services and water meters replacement needs using a probabilistic method. In this analysis, some services and meters are projected to fail earlier than their expected useful lives, while others are expected to fail later. Using this projection method, $7.4 million worth of meters and services are estimated to need replacement in the next 20 years, with an annual average of $371,000. 61,200,000 $900,000 $600,000 4300,000 fllkt' - < I5_ 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 Year Figure 7-9 20-Year Replacement Profile for Water Services and Water Meters —Probabilistic The following table compares the water services and water meters replacement analysis. The actual replacement needs may fall between the two analyses. Table 7-4 20-Year Water Services and Water Meter R&R Summary 20-Year, Probabilistic Backlog Analysis Analysis was performed to compare and contrast the projected asset replacement and rehabilitation work since the start of SJWC's operation in 1997 to actual work performed by SJWC. A life -cycle cost analysis was performed with start year of analysis set to 1997. A planning horizon of 21 years was used to project the asset replacement and rehabilitation needs from 1997 to 2018. According to the analysis, an estimated asset replacement and rehabilitation needs for the 21-year period was $10.3 million. From this value, assets identified with known install year between 1997 and 2018 were removed. This assumes that those assets were installed under SJWC's management. The sum of all assets installed between 1997 to 2018 equated to $8.8 million. Taking $8.8 million from the projected $10.3 million reveals a value of $1.5 million. In theory, $1.5 million should be the amount of backlog not addressed from 1997 to 2018. However, the confidence level of $1.5 million is low. According to the City, SJWC reported having spent $5.73 million on asset rehabilitation and replacements since 1997. Based on this fact, the actual backlog of work could range from $1.5 million to $4.57 million. KAYUGASC31 U I ION 47 7.2 Level of Service Analysis The Level of Service analysis investigates the need for changes to the system to support the service demand. A capacity analysis considering both the current and future demand for water services in the water system was performed as part of the asset management study. The demand includes fire flow demands. As identified in the Cupertino Leased Water System Capacity Analysis (2018), no excessive capacity issues were identified under current demand. The future demand analysis shows that the system demand trend has been decreasing in recent years due to the state-wide drought. In addition, limited or no growth is expected in the service area. As such, the system has the capacity to support future water demand. For more information about the water demand and capacity analysis, refer to the Cupertino Leased Water System Capacity Analysis (2018). If the water demand rises, it is recommended that the City bring the Mercedes Road Storage Tank #1 back in service. Figure 7-10 shows a 10-year history of average water consumption. Since 2008, the average water consumption in Cupertino has steadily declined due to drought and water conservation programs. However, after recent wet winters, the graph reveals the average water consumption rising again. In 2008, the average water consumption was 3 MGD. In 2017, this value dropped to 2 MGD. At 2 MGD, the total capacity required is 3.3 MGD, using a design factor (maximum daily demand) of 1.5 and fire flow requirement of 0.3 MGD. Even with Mercedes Road Storage Tank #1 out of service, there is enough storage (4 MG) in the system to handle this load. However, as the graph shows, starting 2018 there is a bit of upward trend in water consumption. If this trend continues, when the average water consumption reaches 2.5 MGD, the total required storage capacity will reach over 4 MG. In 2018, the average water consumption was 2.26 MGD. The estimated cost to bring Mercedes Road Storage back in operation is approximately $1.92 million. This estimate includes rehabilitation, seismic upgrades, adding mixers, and other safety upgrades. This cost is reflected in Table 7-9. 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Average Water Consumption N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F_ 1- 1- 1-+ N 00 lD O F-+ IV W 41 Ul M J 00 lD O Year Figure 7-10 10-year Water Consumption Trend An additional recommended level of service is to develop an Urban Water Master Plan at an estimated cost of $250,000 every 5 years. Another recommended project is related to the chronic low service pressure at Inspiration Heights. During the project and capacity investigation, it was found that 22 service locations have low pressure concerns. A closed water ICAYUG AS OL.UT ION 48 service pressure zone should be investigated as a solution. This project includes the assessment and design, as well as the installation of a hydropneumatic tank, a small 24-hour pumping system and standby fire pumps, and a separate distribution piping system for an estimated $500,000. This project is recommended to be implemented within 5 years. The connection/development of a SCADA monitoring system for the City is another recommended project. The priority of this recommendation varies based on whether the City chooses to operate the system or not. Even if the City does not operate the system, it will be helpful for the City to have the ability to monitor the status of the Leased Water System. This project is estimated to cost $300,000. This project is recommended to be implemented within 10 years, or earlier if the City decides to operate the system. In addition, level of service includes the investigation of upgrades for regulatory, safety, and emergency concerns at the facilities. Seismic and emergency power upgrades for the storage tanks and wells were identified. The following table shows the recommended level of service upgrades for the facilities. Table 7-5 Level of Service CIP Recommendations 2019 Mercedes Road Station Site Thin foliage and create fire break 2020 Mercedes Tank #2 Improve seismic stability with anchoring, foundation repair, flexible piping and other reinforcement 2023 I Flowering Pear Well Install emergency generator 2023 Franco Court Well Install emergency generator 2024 i Mann Pump Station Suction Tank Improve seismic stability with anchoring, foundation repair, flexible piping and other --- - I reinforcement - $45,000 $ 308,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $92,400 2025 SCADA Monitoring Office $300,000 2029 Mercedes Tank #1 Improve seismic stability with $ 308,000 anchoring, foundation repair, flexible piping and other reinforcement 7.3 Efficiency Analysis The efficiency analysis examined opportunities for increased efficiency (e.g., financial, energy) in the system. In the Recommended Levels of Service, reduce electrical power costs year over year and increase alternative energy sources and fuels was one of the recommendations. The following projects will also help to address this level of service. The following table includes the specific recommendations for the VFD/soft start CIP recommendations for energy efficiency. 1<AYUGASOI UTION 49 Table 7-6 Efficiency CIP Recommendations 2021 Mann Pump Station 2023 Flowering Pear Well 2023 Franco Court Well 7.4 Analysis Summary Install VFDs/Soft starts $150,000 Install VFD/Soft start $ 15,000 Install VFD/Soft start $ 15,000 The following table summarizes the total water system needs, including the condition/age, level of service, and efficiency analyses. Table 7-7 Long Range Water System Needs Summary 100-Year 20-Year 20-Year with 3% Inflation 10 Year 10-Year with 3% Inflation $166.8 million $1.7 million $38.8 million j $1.9 million $54.4 million $2.7 million $15.3 million $1.5 million $17.6 million $1.8 million The following figures show the long-range replacement and rehabilitation profiles including the condition and age analysis, the level of service analysis, and the efficiency analysis. u.uogwo szwoanu span om sc ,rols xC30 M, 2— ­1 — -1 4- MI — -1 — ­1 — =Wes x I., 2131 2105 21�0 xllS ,.I -A Year Figure 7-11 Long -Range Water System Needs - Condition/Age, Level of Service, and Efficiency — 100 Years KAYUGASOI U FION 50 SS JCOCW Sa CUIRb 13 iAa000 52�YJa,o]0 SI NOttV SO Year Figure 7-12 Long -Range Water System Needs - Condition/Age, Level of Service, and Efficiency — 20 Years u.aooaw f3.000000 L'Cea00� SIp00- fa Ma =au Year Figure 7-13 Long -Range Water System Needs - Condition/Age, Level of Service, and Efficiency — 10 Years KAYUGASOI U'I ION 51 10-Year and 20-Year CIP Summary The following tables summarize the recommended CIP for the next 20 years considering the condition, level of service, and efficiency analyses. Table 7-8 2019 to 2028 CIP Summary GAYI.JGAri <�! LJ 1 �C'�N 52 $3,292,800 $1, 355, 700 $118, 800 $816,100 $250,000 $1,184,900 $4,648,500 Table 7-9 2029 to 2038 C!P Summary $3, 313,100 $109, 000 $52,700 $426,400 $62,000 $1,442,900 $2,470,500 $3,732,500 $163, 600 $84,000 $250,000 $479,100 $3,422,100 $146,000 $4,163,400 $3,896,100 $3,669,900 $116,300 $2,371,700 $2,371,700 $3,786,200 -- 53 iGAVU CA S<>1..UT �<>N Appendix A Asset Inventory of Pump Station, Storage Tanks, and Wells 1<AYUGASOL UTION 54 Cristo Rey Storage Tank Driveway Fencing Pavement Vault Structure Tank Valve Valve Access Road Security Fencing Yard Pavement Vault Structure, Level Control Valve Cristo Rey Storage Tank Tank Drain Valve #1 Tank Drain Valve #2 3360 SQFT 790 FT (LENGTH) 4320 SQFT 12 FT (LENGTH) 2.051 MG 4 IN (DIA) 6 IN (DIA) Valve Tank Isolation Valve #1 12 IN (DIA) Valve Tank Isolation Valve #2 12 IN (DIA) Mann Pump Station Fencing Security fence 325 FT (LENGTH) Pavement Concrete Pavement 702 SQFT Pavement Crushed Gravel Pavement 8550 SQFT Tank Suction Tank 0.4 MG Valve Valve Valve Tank Isolation Valve (Emergency Connection) Tank Inlet Air Release Valve Tank Main Inlet Check Valve 6 IN (DIA) 2 IN (DIA) 12 IN (DIA) Valve Tank Main Inlet Isolation Valve 12 IN (DIA) Valve Tank Bypass Upstream Isolation Valve 8 IN (DIA) Valve Valve Instrumentation Instrumentation Tank Bypass Check Valve 8 IN (DIA) Tank Bypass Upstream Isolation Valve 8 IN (DIA) Pressure transmitter Tank level alarm Controller, suction tank level Pump House Gantry Crane Intrusion Alarm Ventilation Fan Engine -Generator Set, Bus B Engine -Generator Set, Bus A Instrumentation Building 1400 SQFT Lifting Equipment 0.75 TON (LOAD) Instrumentation HVAC Generator Generator KAYUGASC7l UTIC)N 55 Control Panel Main Switch Board Control Panel Automatic Transfer Control Panel Motor Control Dis Switch. Bus B / connect- Motor 1 Control Panel I Motor Control/Disconnect - Motor 2 Control Panel Motor Control/Disconnect - Motor 3 Control Panel Motor Control/Disconnect - Motor 4 Control Panel Control Panel SCADA Motor Control/Disconnect - Motor 5 Main Panel SCADA Controller and RTU Valve Pump Suction/Tank Outlet Isolation Valve Valve Pump #3&4 Suction Supply Isolation Valve Valve Booster Pump #1 Suction Isolation Valve Pump Motor Valve Booster Pump #1 I Booster Pump #1 Motor Booster Pump #1 Air Release Valve Valve Booster Pump #1 Check Valve Valve Booster Pump #1 Discharge Isolation Valve Valve Booster Pump #2 Suction Isolation Valve Pump Booster Pump #2 Booster Pump #2 Motor Booster Pump #2 Air Release Valve Motor Valve Valve Booster Pump #2 Check Valve Valve Booster Pump #2 Discharge Isolation Valve Valve Booster Pump #3 Suction Isolation Valve Pump Motor Valve Booster Pump #3 Booster Pump #3 Motor Booster Pump #3 Air Release Valve Valve Valve Valve Pump Motor j Valve L .. Booster Pump #3 Check Valve Booster Pump #3 Discharge Isolation Valve Booster Pump #4 Suction Isolation Valve :=Booster Pump #4 Booster Pump #4 Motor Booster Pump #4 Air Release Valve 460 VOLTS 460 VOLTS 460 VOLTS 14 IN 141N� 10 IN 1,262 / 1,150 GPM 100 HP 0.5 IN 81N 81N 10 IN 1,262 / 1,150 GPM 100 HP 0.5 IN BIN 8 IN 81N 1050 GPM 75 HP 0.5 IN 81N 81N 81N 1262 / 1150 GPM 100 HP 0.5 IN KAYUGASCJI I.J I IUI`.I 56 Name Size Valve Booster Pump #4 Check Valve 8 IN Valve Booster Pump #4 Discharge Isolation Valve 8 IN Valve Booster Pump #5 Suction Isolation Valve 8 IN Pump Booster Pump #5 1600 GPM Motor Booster Pump #5 Motor 100 HP Valve Booster Pump #5 Air Release Valve 0.5 IN Valve Booster Pump #5 Check Valve 8 IN Valve Booster Pump #5 Discharge Isolation Valve 8 IN Vault Structure PRV Vault 6 FT (LENGTH) Sump Pump PRV Vault Sump Pump 1.5 IN Valve Pressure Regulating Valve #1 Upstream Isolation Valve 8 IN Valve Pressure Regulating Valve #1 10 IN Valve Pressure Regulating Valve #1 Downstream Isolation Valve 8 IN Valve Pressure Regulating Valve #2 Upstream Isolation Valve 4 IN Valve Pressure Regulating Valve #2 4 IN Valve Pressure Regulating Valve #2 Downstream Isolation Valve 4 IN Vault Structure Flow Meter Vault 5 FT (LENGTH) Sump Pump Flow Meter Vault Sump Pump 1.5 IN Flow Meter 8 IN Instrumentation 5 FT (LENGTH) Vault Structure Station Flow Meter Vault IN Instrumentation Station Flow Meter Mercedes Road Storage Tanks Name Fencing Fencing Size 700 FT (LENGTH) Pavement Yard Paving Site Site 16092 SQFT Tank Tank#1 2 MG Instrumentation Tank #1 Level Sensor Valve Tank #1 Isolation Valve 20 IN Valve Tank #1 Altitude Valve 20 IN i Valve Tank #1 Inlet Isolation Valve Valve Tank #1 Outlet Isolation Valve KAYUGA SOL U LION 57 Valve Valve i Tank Tank #1 Bypass Isolation Valve Tank #1 Air Release Valve i Tank #2 (Undergoing Rehabilitation) i 2 IN 2 MG Instrumentation Tank #2 Level Sensor Valve Tank #2 Isolation Valve 6 IN Valve Tank #2 Outlet Isolation Valve 6 IN Valve Tank #2 Altitude Valve Valve Tank #2 Air Release Valve Building Mercedes Station Electrical Shed Control Panel - Controller, Emergency Generator Generator Emergency Generator Control Panel— Main Electrical Panel 20 IN IN 70 SQFT 240VOLTS Control Panel SCADA Electrical Sub -Panel Remote Terminal Unit, Mercedes Tank Sensor Flowering Pear Well Fencing Fencing 225 FT (LENGTH) [Pavement Yard Paving Flowering Pear Well Pump, Flowering Pear Well Motor, Pump Air Release Valve 1800 SQFT Well Casing 6 IN Pump 550 GPM Motor Valve 75 HP 2 IN [Valve Isolation Valve, Auxiliary Line 8 IN Valve Isolation Valve, Well 8 IN [�iter Sand Trap _ 81N Instrumentation Control Panel Control Panel Flow Meter Motor Controller Manual Transfer Switch SCADA SCADA Controller and RTU KAYUGASCJI. U f ICJN 58 Franco Court Well Fencing Pavement Fencing Yard Paving 90 FT (LENGTH) 441 SQFT Lighting Well Casing Pump Motor Lighting Franco Court Well Well Pump Pump Motor 8 IN 700 GPM 75 HP Valve Air Release Valve 2 IN Instrumentation Valve Valve Control Panel SCADA Flow Meter Check Valve Isolation Valve Motor Controller SCADA Controller and RTU 8 IN 8 IN 8 IN K/kyuG^s, �L II I ION 59 ICAYU GA SCDL UTI ON - Appendix B Hydraulic Analysis Report 60 1<AYUG/k S U L U 1 IUN City of Cupertino Cupertino Leased Water System Capacity Analysis Prepared by Charlie Marr Consulting ►M K A Y U GA SO L U T I ON Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Purpose......................................................................................................................................1 2 Leased Water System............................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Service Area and Applied Loading................................................................................................................2 2.2 System Demands..........................................................................................................................................3 2.3 General System Operation...........................................................................................................................3 3 Hydraulic Model and Field Testing........................................................................................................................5 4 Capital Improvements.........................................................................................................................................10 Exhibit 1 San Jose Water Company and Cupertino Leased Water System Exhibit 2 City of Cupertino Water Service Areas Exhibit 3 Leased Area Water System and Fire Flow Analysis Locations Exhibit Leased Water System Hydraulic Profile A Computer Model B Cupertino Municipal Water System Fire Flow Analysis (SJWC, January 2017) C J & C Fire Protection Field Flow Tests and Results KAYUGASOLUTION Introduction and Purpose The Cupertino Leased Water System Capacity Analysis was performed to support the Asset Management and Valuation investigation for the City of Cupertino. Cupertino owns a public water supply and distribution system, the operation and maintenance of which has been leased to the San Jose Water Company (SJWC) since 1997. The lease is for 25 years, and will end in 2022. The San Jose Water Company Service area and Cupertino's leased water system service area are shown in Exhibit 1. The City is performing its due diligence to determine system integrity and capacity. As part of the City's due diligence investigation, it contracted with consultants in recent years to begin the process of affirming the water system operation and maintenance activities meet the lease agreement requirements, and that operation of the system is in accordance with customary utility practice and within the Operator's standards of the other water systems it owns and operates. The capacity analysis is a recommendation in the Final Technical Report Leased Water System Inspection, by SPF Water Engineering (January 12, 2017). KAYUGASOI UTt0N F 2 Leased Water System The City of Cupertino's leased system serves the northwest third of its City boundary, as shown in Exhibit 2. The City has leased out its operation and maintenance to San Jose Water Company, which owns a separate water system serving the southern portion of the City. California Water Service Company serves the remainder of the City in the northeastern area of the city. The water system operates in a supply zone and two separate distribution pressure zones, and consists of City - owned groundwater well supply and imported water supply from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD). SCVWD is a wholesaler for retail water utilities including SJWC and the City of Cupertino. The system serves 3.7 square miles of the City and consists of approximately 60 miles of water pipelines (ranging in diameter from 2-inch to 20-inch); 4,554 customer service connections (as of 2017); three 2.0 million -gallon (MG) reservoirs at two reservoir sites (Mercedes and Cristo Rey); a forebay, five parallel booster pumps and imported water supply source at the Mann Drive Pump Station site with total rated capacity of approximately 6,000 gpm capacity; two off -site wells and Homestead Road/Stelling Road transmission system; and two regional pressure -reducing stations at the Mann Drive Pump Station site. These facilities serve, on average, 800 to 1,000 million gallons per year, and represent about two percent of the total water served by San Jose Water Company. 2.1 Service Area and Applied Loading The leased system service area is virtually built -out and consists predominantly of residential land uses. The City's Community Vision 2040 general plan defines the following Special Areas and residential communities within the water service area of the leased system: — Bubb Road (low-rise industrial and research) — Monte Vista Village (residential, neighborhood commercial, public and industrial) — Oak Valley Neighborhood (residential) — Creston-Pharlap Neighborhood (residential, includes school) — Inspiration Heights (residential, includes institution and Mercedes reservoirs) — Monte Vista North (residential, schools) — Garden Gate (residential) According to the general plan, limited or no growth is expected from these areas except for 42 acres of vacant privately -held land that could develop homes on a portion. This would still represent minimal increased demands in the future and not be significant for the model analysis. KAYUGASOLU iI ON 2.2 System Demands The Annual Reports SJWC produces for the Cupertino Municipal Water System identifies average annual demands of the leased water system as follows: Table 2-1 — Average Annual Water Demands The trend seen here with lower demands in recent years is typical of what the industry has observed due to the persistent state-wide drought. Since 2011, California has been in one of the most severe extended droughts on record. Peaking of demands is an important consideration in water model simulations for two reasons — fire flow analysis and peak demand analysis. Peaking information for the leased system was requested but not provided for the modeling investigation. First, fire flow simulation is standardized by the California Fire Code (CFC) and required to be analyzed during maximum -day normal demands. 'Maximum -day' represents the largest volume of water demanded by a water system over a 24-hour period. Typical for public municipal water systems, the maximum daily volume occurs in the summer time when irrigation demands are at their highest. Second, peak normal demands for public water systems occur for much shorter periods. For public municipal water systems, these peaks, commonly referred to as "peak - hour", occur during the early morning and early evening hours just before the work day begins and just after the work day ends, as people shower in the morning and use dishwashers and clothes washers in the evening. Depending on the size of the public water system and land use make-up, maximum -day demand factors could range from 1.5 to 3.0 times average demand flow; and peak -hour factors could range from 2.5 to 5.0 times average demand flow. Considering the size of Cupertino's leased system, with a usage that can exceed 2.0 million gallons per day on average, the modeling study adopted 2.0 for the maximum -day factor and 4.0 for the peak -hour factor. 2.3 General System Operation A current water master plan outlining system operation, including water supply and distribution characteristics, was not available for this study. The general operation was gleaned from provided documents, a phone interview, and e-mail correspondence with San Jose Water Company staff. The leased water system is supplied by imported water from the Santa Clara Valley Water District and groundwater from City -owned wells outside of the leased system service area. The Franco and Flowering Pear Wells are located within the City of Cupertino but outside the leased system service area adjacent to Homestead Road and Forge Way. i<AYUGASOL UT ION 3 Recent major improvements were done to the well systems' conveyance system, and should be capable of supporting any improvements to well operation and production capacity. The imported water supply is from a Santa Clara Valley Water District connection and meter at the Mann Drive Pump Station (MDPS) site. Both supply sources are designed to fill the Mann Drive Pump Station 400,000-gallon forebay. The forebay acts to supply stable suction hydraulics for the MDPS pumps. The leased water system operates in an "open" system with reservoirs at elevation to supply system pressure by gravity. MDPS pumps operate to maintain water levels in the reservoirs at approximate pad elevation of 600 feet, namely the Mercedes and Cristo Rey tanks, which have a total capacity of 6.0 million gallons (MG). Considering the total demands of the leased system and fire flow volume requirements, the leased system storage capacity should be adequate for "time -of -use" operation. Time -of -use refers to avoiding the need to operate system facilities like pumps and wells during peak electrical power costs. Pumping only during off-peak hours is the preferred operation of water utilities in order to minimize operating costs. However, SJWC staff indicated that in order to maintain water service pressures at the highest elevations of the system, the reservoir levels must be maintained at or near high water level at all times (approximately 630 feet elevation). Staff indicated that the pumps must turn on every two- to four- hours in order to maintain the water levels, depending on the time of year. This requires short and frequent pumping periods that could also significantly reduce pump life. SJWC staff also indicated that the primary source of supply is from Santa Clara Valley Water District imported water. Typically, local groundwater production that is not brackish (very low quality requiring reverse osmosis treatment) is more cost effective than paying for imported water. The City should investigate the cost of the two sources, considering water quality, conveyance, well improvements and pumping rights, and control of its own water supply. The lowest elevations at the northeast end of the service area are pressure -reduced to manageable pressures because static pressures at elevations below about 280 feet (elevation above mean sea level) are excessive and could be dangerous for maintenance and upkeep. Lowering pressures is also a very effective way of reducing water loss. The "Mann Regulated Zone" consists of approximately 250 residential connections. 1<AYUGASOL UT I ON 4 Hydraulic Model and Field Testing The computer water model provided by SJWC staff was pre -loaded with `average' demands totaling 1,682 gallons per minute (gpm), which is consistent with system demands from the Annual Reports. Another component of water demand and sizing of distribution facilities is fire flow. Standardized fire flows for different types of land uses are typically provided in Water Master Plans or other hydraulic analysis reports that were not available for this modeling study. Current fire flow requirements are listed in the California Fire Code (CFC) as high as 8,000 gpm at 20 psi, with reductions allowed when fire sprinkler systems are included in building construction. Invariably, large structures are conditioned forfire sprinklers regardless of construction materials used. The CFC allows for a reduction in fire flow requirements of up to 75 percent. Also, fire flow requirements for the purposes of the model analysis should consider that many of the structures within the City's service area were likely constructed at a time when the fire flow requirements were lower. With these considerations, and the limited expected development or redevelopment that could occur, it is reasonable to evaluate the leased system capacities at various locations based on land use with the fire flow requirements as stated in the Final Technical Report, and summarized in Table 3-1: Table 3-1— Capacity Requirements Single-family 180,000 Residential 1,500 2 Multi -family 2,000 2 240,000 Residential All other 2,500 2 300,000 zoning The following is a summary of system demand loadings used for the computer model analysis: Table 3-2 — System Demand Loadings Average Demand Max -Day Demand Peak -Hour Demand System -wide System -wide System -wide 1,682 .p 3,364.. Note: 2*Avg = Max -day; 4.0*Avg = Peak -hour The Innovyze modeling software (formerly MWH Soft) InfoWater was used in a stand-alone version (no AutoCAD or Arcview platform) in instantaneous analysis mode. The scenarios selected were designed to analyze system capacity at different land uses throughout the service area. These scenarios were then field tested to validate system performance. Appendix A includes a graphic of the leased system water model. I<AYUGASOLUTION The computer model includes the complete distribution system from the Mann Drive Pump Station to the Mercedes and Cristo Rey tanks. In all, nine simulation scenarios were performed for the purposes of hydraulic model analysis and establishing hydraulic bases for comparing with field flow testing: Scenario 1: Supply scenario, zero system demand, Mann Drive PS operating Scenario 2: Max -day system demand (3,364 gpm), normal operation, MDPS off Scenario 3: Peak -hour system demand (6,728 gpm), normal operation, MDPS off Scenario 4: Max -day plus FF #1 (Exhibit 3), 2500 gpm at Alves Street (J23992), MDPS off Scenario 5: Max -day plus FF #2 (Exhibit 3), 2500 gpm at Mary Avenue (J23440), MDPS off Scenario 6: Max -day plus FF #3 (Exhibit 3), 2500 gpm at Scenic Circle (144068), MDPS off Scenario 7: Max -day plus FF #4 (Exhibit 3), 2500 gpm at Alcalde Drive (J63366), MDPS off Scenario 8: Max -day plus FF #5 (Exhibit 3), 2500 gpm at Ainsworth Drive (J65056), MDPS off Scenario 9: Max -day plus FF #6 (Exhibit 3), 1500 gpm at Voss Avenue (J65056), MDPS off Simulation Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 provide hydraulic characteristics under normal conditions. Scenarios 4 through 9 simulate foreseeable emergency fire events at critical locations. InfoWater includes a fire flow tool that, for each fire flow simulation, evaluates the entire system for deficient pressures in addition to meeting the minimum 20 psi at the fire flow location. This analysis uses the minimum pressure criteria for the fire flow junction of 20 psi (based on Uniform Fire Code), and maintains positive pressure everywhere else in the system. Table 3-3 summarizes the hydraulic analysis results for the fire flow scenarios. Table 3-3 — Fire Flow Hydraulic Analysis Results ModelingD. Calculated signated Simulation Scenario Node Elevation Normal Residual Flow at Fire Flow 20 psi at for Fire Flow psi Planning Purposes 2 - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - 4 J23992 269 82.77 psi 1,090 gpm 25.63 psi 1,147 gpm 1,500 gpm 5 J23440 296 139.83 psi 2,104 gpm 112.26 psi 4,652 gpm 2,500 gpm 6 J44068 323 128.38 psi 2,005 gpm 117.39 psi 6,900 gpm 2,500 gpm 7 J63366 446 75.28 psi 2,077 gpm 71.65 psi 9,038 gpm 2,500 gpm 8 J65056 J65152 314 542 132.33 33.69 psi psi 2,192 1,399 gpm gpm 125.39 20.00 psi psi 9,858 1,399 gpm gpm 2,500 gpm 9 1,500 gpm [1j Normal (static) pressure is taken from the Max -day system demand Scenario 2. [21 As designated for the Final Technical Report (SPF Water, January, 2017) KAYU GAS OL U T I ON Other parameters important for hydraulic analysis evaluation are maximum flow velocity and minimum system pressure. Typical maximum velocities for design of public water systems are 3 to 5 feet per second (fps) for normal operation, and 10 to 17 feet per second for emergency fire flow conditions. The typical standard for minimum pressures during normal operation is 40 psi to ensure adequate pressure for second floors of residential structures. Although the velocities resulting from the analysis are within these criteria, the minimum system pressures are not. Table 3-4 is a summary of the maximum velocities and minimum pressures observed for each scenario. 1<AYUGASOI UTION 7 } 1 I 2 (No Demands) 1 (Max -day) 5.93 fps (14' 2.69 fps, Mann Dr PS 2.40 fps discharge) T602760 D531051 (8") D531151 (20") 10-24 psi 9-24 psi (Inspiration Hts) (Inspiration Hts) J56126, 76014, - J56126, 76014, - 016, -022, et al. 016, -022, et al. Table 3-4 - Maximum System Velocities and Minimum System Pressures 3 4 5 6 7 8 (Peak -hour) _ (Alves St FFF (May Ave FF) , (Scenic Cir. FF ) (Alcalde St FF) (Ainsworth St FF) 5.56 fps, 8.20 fps 2.41 fps 6.66 fps 6.06 fps 4.30 fps 4.17 fps D531051 (8") D531800 (8") D531151 (20") D532110 (8") D531682 (12") D531675 (12") D531845 (8") D531151 (20") D531156 (10") D531151 (20") 6-24 psi 11-24 psi 10-24 psi 10-24 psi , 10-24 psi 9-24 psi (Inspiration Hts) (Inspiration Hts) (Inspiration Hts) (Inspiration Hts)(Inspiration Hts) (Inspiration Hts) J56126, 76014, - J56126, 76014, - J56126, 76014, - J56126, 76014, J56126, 76014, - J56126, 76014, - 016,-022, et al. 016, -022, et al. 016,-0 et al. 016, -022, et al. 016, 022, et al. 016, -022, et al. fps = feet per second psi = pounds per square inch ID = identification number used in the computer model. 9 (Voss Ave FF) 8.96 fps D532154 (8") -4 - 24 psi (Inspiration Hts) J56126, 76014, - 016, -022, et al., & FF Node 8 As outlined in the table, model nodes with service to several estate lots in the hills of southwest Cupertino (namely Inspiration Heights residential community) are at elevations too high to comply with normal water service pressure standards. SJWC addresses this in a January 4, 2017 fire flow analysis memorandum and identifies these service areas as customer services with 'less than 20 psi' or 'no water' with a boil -water -advisory should a fire event occur. Even under normal conditions, as indicated in Table 5, service pressures can be less than 10 psi during normal conditions. It is assumed these services incorporate private pumping for adequate shower pressure, as well as dishwasher and clothes washer appliance pressure. The SJWC memorandum is included in Appendix B. Scenarios 4 through 9 indicate adequate fire flow capacity for all locations except Garden Gates and Inspiration Heights. Scenarios 4 through 8 were field tested on November 20, 2018 by J&C Fire Protection. Field flow testing was recommended as a result of the findings of a series of technical memorandums of the Final Technical Report study (SPF, 2017). The flow testing crew, supported by SJWC and City of Cupertino staff, locate the desired hydrant to flow and a separate location for reading system pressures (normal operating pressure prior to flowing the hydrant, often called 'static'; and dynamic pressure during flow typically referred to as 'residual') and performed the proper flow testing procedure at each site. These field measurements should be taken periodically to confirm model results. The results of the field flow tests performed are included in Appendix C. Table 3-5 includes a comparison of the fire flow analysis between model results and field flow testing results, and shows a distinct difference in all but the Alves Street location. Table 3-5 — Fire Flow Analysis Comparison — Model vs. Field Flow Testing Alves St 55 psi 1,083 gpm 40 psi 1,180 gpm 1,147 gpm Mary Ave 145 psi 2,059 gpm 100 psi 3,575 gpm 4,652 gpm Scenic Circle 135 psi 2,293 gpm 98 psi 4,230 gpm 6,900 gpm Alcalde Rd 80 psi 1,595 gpm 55 psi 2,559 gpm 9,038 gpm Ainsworth Dr 130 psi 2,059 gpm 1 100 psi 4,153 gpm ! 9,858 gpm [11 Alves Street is in Mann Regulated Zone; therefore, calculation at 20 psi uses normal pressure that would be generated without pressure reduction. Estimated elevation of flow test at Alves Street is 270 feet, 630 HWL - 270 = 360 ft = 156 psi. Assuming the geometry of the model provided by SJWC was confirmed for accuracy — i.e. elevations, pipe lengths, and pipe diameters — this could be an indication that pipe connections thought to have been constructed were actually not constructed (adversely affecting circulation and system capacity), or pipe roughness factors should be much lower in the model, or both. In addition, old or broken valves not properly abandoned, or thought to be removed, could also reduce system capacity. In any event, these major differences in field and modeling data should be corrected to acceptable tolerances before relying on modeling data for any further system analysis. KAYUGASOt UTION The apparent deficient fire flow at Alves Street could be a settings error in the model that needs further investigation. Review of the results reports indicate twice the flow as necessary flowing through the Mann regulation valves causing erroneously high headloss readings. Reducing the headloss will result in higher available flow to Alves Street and the entire Mann Regulated Zone service area. Capital Improvements Evaluation of the water system capacity using computer modeling shows that the system should be capable of operating within time -of -use and normally accepted criteria, with the exception of the highest residential services in Inspiration Heights. Adequate interconnection locations exist, and could be improved for automatic operation (actively connected). In addition, a SCADA headquarters office should be constructed and implemented for the ability to monitor all major water system functions — Well operation, Mann Drive PS operation and forebay water levels, SCVWD service connection flows, pressure -reducing valve operation, reservoir water levels at Mercedes and Cristo Rey sites, and interconnection flows. Water systems operation should incorporate digital readouts, electronic maps and signals to a single operator (dispatcher) at any hour of the day to alert on -call field staff in the event of ruptured mains, pumping failure, power outage, water supply outage, low reservoir water levels, etc. The Department of Public Health has strict guidelines for publicly -owned water utilities, in addition to operator registration requirements, for specific capacities within the organizational structure of a utility operation. The following is a list of capital improvement projects gathered from the research of recent documentation provided for the hydraulic analysis study that should be prioritized for the City of Cupertino's leased water system: 1. Evaluate all options to remove/reduce the City's liability associated with the low service pressures in Inspiration Heights. Potential liability could arise with water quality degradation due to the low pressures, or lack of water capacity during normal operation, and lack of fire flow capacity during emergency operations. Options could include legal agreements with each homeowner, construction of a hydropnuematic pressure zone or other closed system operation, or City purchase.and maintenance of individual private pumping units. 2. Based on the Final Technical Report (SPF, January 2017), the capacity and efficiency of the Mann Drive Pump Station needs major upgrades, and may require a redesign for time -of -use operation. This should include an evaluation of the adequacy of its backup power supply. 3. Perform a complete well inspection of both Franco and Flowering Pearwells, including mechanical/material inspection, efficiency testing, and downhole video to assess the level of needed rehabilitation. 4. Investigate the cost of the two sources of City water— local groundwater and imported water from SCVWD. This should consider issues such as water quality and on -going treatment requirements of each; operation and upkeep of the conveyance systems for each; well maintenance, improvements and pumping rights; and control of its own water supply. Curiously, SJWC does not emphasize maximizing local groundwater production despite the State of California's efforts to incentivize water suppliers to use local water supplies. 5. Prepare a Water Master Plan. Water Master Plans should be the cornerstone for funding a water system. A thorough water master plan includes analysis to justify capital improvement and replacement projects that should be reviewed on an annual basis. The Water Master Plan itself should be updated at least every 10 years, or when a major update to the general plan is made. Municipal finance departments rely heavily on a water master plan to perform the necessary updates to keep its capital Improvement and replacement programs current. 6. Investigate the water quality concerns at the Mercedes Reservoir site. One of the Mercedes Reservoir site tanks was reportedly emptied approximately two years ago due to "considerations of water age and KAYUG AS OLU T I ON 10 quality". Water quality would be the primary concern for the method of operation currently employed by the SJWC. 7. Update the Mercedes tanks to current seismic code. According to the SPF report, both tanks may be out of compliance with seismic construction requirements. Ironically, the "General Cupertino Leased Area Description" report describes the operational practice of minimizing the water level in the tanks (maximizing Freeboard) in order to "minimize damage from sloshing during a seismic event". This is inconsistent with SJWC staff assertion that the Mercedes tank water levels are maintained between 29.5 and 32 feet, which is at or near the high water level at all times to improve service pressures for nearby residents. This represents conflicting operational goals that could be detrimental to valuable storage capacity. Additionally, operating a 2.0 million -gallon reservoir with a water level band at the highest 2.5 feet is not prudent reservoir operation and negates many of the advantages of incorporating storage within a distribution system. 8. Investigate as -built plans and the reported existence of a "logbook" that could have records of system improvements since 1916, according to the SPF report. This could provide clues to lost and paved -over old valves that have broken and fallen into the flow path of old pipelines still in operation. Such debris would be a capacity and water quality detriment to a water system, and could be a reason for the difference in computer model results and field-tested capacity. 9. Start a hydrant flushing and valve maintenance program. Hydrant flushing should include gathering hydraulic data for field verification of the computer model. Valve maintenance program should include exercising each valve, documenting turns, and inventory type, location, and size. 10. Pave the access road to Cristo Rey tank site. These capital projects represent top priority within a comprehensive Capital Improvement/Replacement Program. Additional projects should be identified through further cooperation from San Jose Water Company and candid descriptions of chronic operational challenges from staff. Otherwise, the oldest 4-inch (and smaller) "system" pipelines dating back to the 1930's and before should be prioritized for immediate replacement. If a logbook, as indicated in Item 8 above, exists it can be a very good resource for prioritization. KAYUGA=�'.-11 11 N , ■■CIA\11\ ,1-...,, f ♦ Y tt yl'�'! Mountun t,t' 1 ,1tns -- i us. iGr 1 101 I Leased Water System Service Area C ! 71 3 45 6 Miles L.1 if �„�r i�J•� i f Y'J ✓ t San Jose Water Company Service 'Area S Source: San Jose Water Company 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, Figure 3.1 Exhibit 1 'ax 41� urce, 9 I HO EM STEAD F(D LONDONDERRY DR LORNE w" �4tlr. /2 i r o m % i3 3 ` s aRUNEiyo j x Q Z 5 rc �LLI � °EAI:E °y tt J OiFS i U l ¢ WO Q Q oP� z4 v� ' N ` Z CALIFORNIA WATER 3 Z o r� ew� z W SERVICE _ m o c O� VALL CO pa� '�' a WHEATOM pR aw �srEVENS CREEK BLVD �N STEVENS CREEK BLVD SCOFlELD 6R CP 09> w i CUPERTINO WATERw vD a x E�,,,,dto Son Jose Water until 2022] SHELLY DR ¢ti a w LA MAR OR � �'�w q�� � NICCLELIAN RD a < PH0. LN TILSDN,NE wo K ,"N WAY g w p 4 R7JG MRWIN LN 3,O o:'SlM "`iii p m�r2 Z OU kKS OR +,. DTy� ci 0 1 rd o "ro°e°"taf l p COLV MBVS AVE o ~ a r`.2TOE LN 2 a� VAI AVE Q F'L 44 'tt�y O CH o., TERR� SAID JOSE WATER 'i'' ��<N AVF v j SERVICE ° VE BLBA HILL OR ARK IN RAN BOW OR ' 'I EN $pTUN09 p City of Cupertino a Water Service Areas 4" Mlles PROSPECT RD no , January 12, CXF11D11 L 9Q From Flower- Pressure- ing Pear and reduced Franco Wells a Model Fireflow Zone m Simulation #5 Commercial (2500 gpm) Mann Drive �00 Pump Station & Forebay & � Cristo Rey PRVs o Reservoir — (1-2.OMG) N� Model Fireflow Simulation #1 b-__ Public Facility (2500 gpm) q�s o- -� a -g g ° e --oStevens Creek Blvd o- 80 Model Fireflow Simulation 42 Commercial Model Fireflow koo.� (2500 gpm) Simulation #6 N Residential �� o— � o- • p� (1500 gpm) I p _ 0 _ O O Mercedes co McClellan Road Reservoirs 0 0 3 (2-2.OMG) 0 o-- Model Fireflow 0) o� Simulation #3 — Public Facility Model Fireflow (2500 gpm) (n Simulation #4 School Supply Pipe (2500 gpm) Bubb/Rosario interconnection Pipe Dia. 8" or less (w/ SJWC) Santa Teresa/Columbus Pipe Dia. 10" or 12" inerconnection (w/ SJWC) Pipe Dia. 14" or greater Exhibit 3 Mercedes Cristo Rey Station Station Tan #1 Tank#2' Tank �. 2.0.MG Mercedes Distribution Zone Cristo Rey Ah-rDistributior Operational Zone Mann er. Zone Valve Mann Drive Booster 4" and 10" B-5 B-4 B-3 B-2 B-1 Station Regulators SCVWD %TankMan Dr. Mann onk RegulatedDistribution ZoneW-1 Flowering Franco Ct. Pearl Well Well Pump Pump Source: City of Cupertino Final Technical Report Leased Water System Inspection, January 12, 2017. Exhibit 4 APPENDIX A Computer Model J80174 Exhibit A-1 Exhibit A-2 Exhibit A-3 1500129 59 Exhibit A-4 J$1870 J75448 81888 Mann Drive Pump J65054 Station 5 Fire Flow #5 g J349 J83090 J84652 Ainsworth J77874 PRVs for Mann J337 Regulated zone J52888 J58754 J7351 J74166 13 2 J J7453S ® J$4520 J8 234 J81198 J7 374 ,p74 J83314 J$4S J31998 1319 8 39 J68J714 AM58 J32920 J80144 JB9072 �J81874 444 J7 2P J72838 2 \I 508 3 18 J84854 J32922 J33 98 J88822 5394 J88828 149440 �� .3420. J 056 J 852 0 � J73188 240 J 384 J43574J"598 J7 J3431 J734 72 22980 J7 e2 J73558 J74154 J73788 ZV500023 J5 J84552 34238 J74752 J J45992 J51188 40 J558 J27 J288M 3438 J24882 J ` J5 8 448120 J48118 J5388 J27556 M508 570 J45 J41958 J55202 JBg J25328 55088 J30542 J49888 1700 92 J55090 3WI90 J54988 J54490 J488 J45340 A42 52 J49564 J49540 I\ 50388 J20254 J55008 J54988 r8 481 421 J713$ 1 J56 52 8$878 1 J 8 J49586 J58`� J53018 J55058 42844 258 J54492 ;58 J58962 J55378 J5495J59�288JBIO& 127310 Exhibit A-5 n J50970 J50972 J51548 ®J48080 I J48078 J71524 ;18 J50734 J83124 J53 J50028 9804 J53910 J54588 IJ52092 4 J55458 J48732 J 8 '\ J48378 J48448 J47880 tiD J51928 J48432 J48430 J41886 7852 41858 J41704 J41024 J41800 8?018 J38908 J45730 J38798 J38296 J38298 Fire flow #3 Scenic Drive J37824 J37828 48 J37888 J4 J4574 J45808 J42288 7J376M J44088 J8208 J45002 J45400 J44890 344888 J30952 J29780 -0 J30174 Exhibit A-6 J24964 1JI4356 J25618 J25025 J55378 J54 J59288 J810 J27310 J5835 J 930 J2750 J56282 J 44 J7 J8208 J29 J27502 J30808 J40758 J37834 J21482 J53910 J28730 J J5 8 J55458 J55130 J53120 Fire Flow #2 —] J30952 Mary Ave J51928 J52550 J29780 J30174 J41704 J411 J53 S J24954 J14358 J41024 J4 230 J 047 J4573O J38795 J39056 J38 54 J 30 45264 J38296 J38298 J39358 28 J15858 J45748 J37024 J37826 J45280 80 1 4 J25818 J4560 142288 J45400 J45002 1304 J44890 950 J44088 � 2 J44888 rw 0-y even N500129 J79392 ZV500059 / IJ44830 0 0 J18360 Exhibit A-7 J13888 J84520 J83314 J73914 72 N W508 4€3 4 88828 4 J73188 J68624 J7 J74154 J73788 JS405$ \\ JM54 J3431 Mann Regulated Zone J34586 J38138,* IJ38* J38011 J3�'a920f 31998 J32400 432398 ZV500023 +JM38 t Exhibit A-8 IA1884 J80222 J73188 J3431 Mann Regulated Zone U � J74154 J73788 ZV500023 J51188 J558 J275 J28530 38 J48120 J4$1i8 J5388 J27555 J29508 J55202 J30542 55090 J58190 J54988 J54490 J488 J49540 J55008 J54988 J58588 J 6 J5505i J54492 J5494('�,J59288 ® 810 __ J2731.0 J7&0 J8208 J29 J27502 J30808 4►- J53910 J28730 J r8 J55458 J58130 J 20 J30952 J51928 052550 J'29780 J30174 J41704 J41 J53 J24964 J14356 J45730 J38 796 I J39058 Fire Flow #2 Mary Ave J338M J37008 131044 J20200 J17496 1 ZV500025 J20988 J21482 Exhibit A-9 3888 14 APPENDIX B Cupertino Municipal Water System Fire Flow Analysis (SJWC) sm Memorandum CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS Background San Jose Water Company (SJWC) provides residents of the Cupertino Municipal Water System (MWS) with high quality water and exceptional customer service. SJWC maintains and operates the MWS based on a 25-year Lease agreement, which is set to expire in less than six years on October 1, 2022. The Cupertino MWS consists of 4,183 service connections, about 58 miles of pipe, four welded steel storage tanks, five booster pumps, two wells and one regulator station. The system is comprised of three hydraulic pressure zones: Mercedes Zone, Cristo Rey Zone and Mann Regulated Zone. Imported surface water supply from Santa Clara Valley Water District (District) is the primary source of water for this system. In addition, there are two groundwater wells named Franco and Flowering Pear both located near Homestead Rd., east of Stelling Rd. District water and groundwater are both blended together at Mann Drive Station, which acts as the central hub for all three pressure zones. The City of Cupertino (City) requested from SJWC a fire flow evaluation to demonstrate that the MWS can adequately respond to a simulated fire flow event. The following sections describe SJWC's analysis and results. Analysis The Santa Clara County Fire Department has indicated that for planning purposes fire flow requirements will vary from 1,500 gpm for two hours to 2,500 gpm for two hours based on zoning. In the Cupertino MWS, the highest fire flow requirement is 2,500 gpm in proximity to schools and public facilities. Residential neighborhoods have a fire flow requirement of 1,500 gpm for two hours. Based on zonirrg within the Cupertino MWS and the distribution system network, SJWC determined that the area near Monte Vista High School is most appropriate to perform the requested fire flow evaluation. Should the City determine that an alternate location is preferred, SJWC will rerun the analysis. Santa Clara County Fire Department has accepted hydraulic simulations in lieu of field flows from SJWC for more than twenty years. To further demonstrate to the City the resiliency of their water system, SJWC simulated a fire flow event under normal operating conditions and a worst case hydraulic analysis based on a fire event following an earthquake. Assumptions For the fire flow simulation based on normal operating conditions, the following assumptions were made: CUPERTINO LEASED AREA HYDRAULIC STUDY H:\PUBLIC\CUPERTINOMWS DOYLEPROPERTY\CUPERTINOTM.DOCX January4,2017 smMemorandum • All tanks were assumed to be online • Maximum day demand conditions • The emergency pumper connection between SJWC and the MWS is offline For the fire flow simulation based on a worst case scenario, the following assumptions were made: • Both Mercedes Station tanks are offline • Mann Station tank is offline • Flowering Pear and Franco Court wells are offline • Maximum day demand conditions • The emergency pumper connection between SJWC and Cupertino MWS is offline Mann Drive 4" and 10" Regulators Mann Regulated Distribution Zone Mercedes Cristo Rey Station Station Tank#1 Tank#2 2.0 MG 2.0 MG Mercedes Distribution Zone Cristo Rey T, Distribution Operational Zone Mann Dr. ZoneValve Booster Station SCVWD "Tank' Mann Dr. 0.18 MG Tank Flowering Franco Ct. Pear Well Well Figure 1. System Schematic for Simulated Worst Case Scenario For the worst case scenario, two hydraulic model runs were analyzed: 1) three pumps at Mann Drive Booster Station online; and 2) all five pumps at Mann Drive Booster Station online. Results There are 11 services on the southwest side of the Cupertino MWS that have static pressure below 20 psi. These homes are situated at an elevation that is very high when compared to the base elevation of Mercedes Tanks. CUPERTINO LEASED AREA HYDRAULIC STUDY 2 HAPUBLIC\CUPERTINOMWS_DOYLE PROPERTY\CUPERTINO TM.DOCX January 4, 2017 sm Memorandum When a fire flow event occurs near Monte Vista High School under normal operating conditions residual pressures are not significantly impacted at these high elevation homes or anywhere within in the distribution system because of the redundancy in storage and boosting facilities in the MWS. When simulating the worst case scenario with both Mercedes Tanks taken out of service, more customers on the southwest side of the leased area would either have no water or have pressure between 3 and 20 psi. To minimize the impact to customer's water pressure following this simulated event, boosters at Mann Station must be continuously operating. If all five pumps at Mann Drive Booster Station are in service, there are 15 services with no water and 19 services with system pressure below 20 psi. Due to the location of these low pressure services on a cul-de-sac, there is no potential for pipe looping. Under the simulated worst case scenario, a boil water advisory will be required for services with no water. Simulated system results during a fire flow event under normal operating conditions and a worst case scenario are presented in Table 1 and Figures 1, 2 and 3. Table 1. Number of Services with No Water or Pressure Less than 20 psi() • Z,000 gprn nre nUw • Max Day Demand Mercedes Tanks; • All tanks online Cristo Rey Tank; 11 • Pumper connection with Mann Drive Booster Station SJWC offline Cristo Rey Tank; • 2,500 gpm fire flow Mann Drive Booster Station 68 33 • Max Day Demand (operating 3 pumps) • Both Mercedes tanks offline • Pumper connection with Cristo Rey Tank; SJWC offline Mann Drive Booster Station 1 b 19 (operating 5 pumps) (a) Under maximum day demand conditions with a 2,500 gpm fire flow demand near Monte Vista High School Summary SJWC has a long history of providing high quality water and exceptional customer service to residents in the MWS. The system is well prepared to provide adequate water supplies to the Santa Clara County Fire Department during a fire flow event under both normal operating conditions and following a catastrophic event. CUPERTINO LEASED AREA HYDRAULIC STUDY H:\PUBLIC\CUPERTINOMWS_DOYLE PROPERTY\CUPERTINO TkDOCX January 4, 2017 APPENDIX C J&C Fire Protection Field Flow Test Results � �•� r„ t � .��, i�:¢1b'.'"$i. k ��' �. - '4�� L ..tis'Y }Y .�.+i IC, • � , t � i>� �.�.: - f � � 'a.! tpr T ►��i y� ,1: � un� A,K'P1r {;� . ��'r_ �; � ; • � � emorial Park r . ,1. � �;, �i \., -�'- ! 1� .I��l�y '��� •ill ',� — ..t. y •-.. �� r,. .h m,aa _ - , rn �r -,, _ !�`'nY.� • —,yr' jJ i:, s �•-%..t 'J. P .:i.x� 4X ,� f,,'�'.; "7 - �.. '. ^ram •� Tfv �.i' � •yC•. «• s. IN �� ., ,., •��, ' ,t tea-P� '� f • `' +1 TT .l `Y .r h i R. e x �Y p +Y' J may.?•. 4 �,,�•.� q`. r\ i,y�°'7s�\ - �`.',y F•� r •P Sena a Wary. _;•. 4y:�f e� . ;_�,. -•: rj- ' � a"ie " hL'.,+` t .a ..... � � a•. 2 ' -. 'yip ;,. pt ',�c�.•,t?riy t'\ . i7 . '1.w I V: Go g e Earth _ 2 ft 01 Goo { "" FIRE PROl u s 5 � Location of test: Alves St Cupertino, CA 95014 Hydrant Z-00129 The follow available flow and pressure information is bases on a maximum day demand hydraulic model analysi J&C Safety lst Fire Protection, Inc. This information should be used as a guidance of the approximate available recommended that a design allowance be made for possible reduction in pressure and/ or flow that could occur possible scenarios. Applicate understands that J&C Safety 1 st Fire Protection Inc can not guarantee any specific pressure and flow. If you have any questions; please contact us at jetireprotection(a)gmail.cont or call us at (510) Possible fire service connection 41 Connection Point Static 55 PSI Residual Pressure 40 PSI Pitot Reading 8 PSI (1083GPM) �-CEGI Icily Q�o�15tFIre pr- 0�,� -- y� yV - - _ ay CIASSIFACnON -- _- -- _ -. V C-16 p 7 UCENSENO. - -- — 964500 * _. �rEhe nett 26203 Production Ave. Ste. #8 Hayward, CA 94545 - Web: www.jOreprotection,com/E-mail: jcfireprotection@gmall.ci Legend Ave Mary -. I. ;�+► Write a description for your map. ! IM w. t ' ,;;.w•000 � , + ~ � s x � • , Syr � �' � '' ,�` � .r'r 'y � " JkA , �•.< �'..s • s Jr P �«u!� T" v jA ty 1 * �i. I —.:'p' fbii i , E, W • 1 • r1. W aao.1 + to �� y 1 � � � ar •4litri.�.i 3'r' 1 ww ii ` gl 6 r , • I'I • © ® ° EMA I ti, 92 FIRE plipT P Fb1 Cf g L u L a � Location of test: Mary Ave Cupertino, CA 95014 Hydrant Z-00074 The follow available flow and pressure information is bases on a maximum day demand hydraulic model analysi J&C Safety I st Fire Protection, Inc. This information should be used as a guidance of the approximate available recommended that a design allowance be made for possible reduction in pressure and/or flow that could occur possible scenarios. Applicate understands that J&C Safety I st Fire Protection Inc can not guarantee any specific pressure and flow. If you have any questions, please contact us at jcftreprotecfion@gmaii.com gmail.com or callus at (510) Possible fire service connection #1 Connection Point Static 145 PSI Residual Pressure 100 PSI Pitot Reading 30 PSI (2059GPM) 1OA( c, 7 u}! CIASSIFACnON C-18 ' ucENSE NO. 964500 k �4 OF CA'� 26203 Production Ave. Ste. #8 Hayward. CA 94545 - Web. www.jOreprotection.com/ E-mail: jcrtreprotection@gmail.o Ay 491 ,+�i 4 k i t � �a• stiy��''�1,% * ,t.' �;:'w'' ����+ � a �i�4 � r ' �'`�,.'" :�, `{ s: ��: ' � z ats� -• ScenicBlvd .� .rid +. - �.� "r ��,� •4. r, Fri, + w., .dd' _,� '� ''��... � � !,% �` N6�n4. � ,•e`er •.. f1��x� ' � .-'-i+ • Mpg J', - � `'_, dry* F �,,.• �.� �`• •� �. A�� ���'Y s VC _ �R r VL Le w ci ,• �a� � 1. "max � .S t �'+�• =.. '1 d 1�i '.-jt,�{,% lap t, ryw C y^+�� 01 VINN OIL ri `o9 Ie•Earth 600 ft n 2018 Google y. Location of test: Scenic Cir Cupertino, CA 95014 Hydrant Z-00211 The follow available flow and pressure information is bases on a maximum day demand hydraulic model analysi J&C Safety I st Fire Protection, Inc. This information should be used as a guidance of the approximate available I recommended that a design allowance be made for possible reduction in pressure and/ or flow that could occur i possible scenarios. Applicate understands that J&C Safety Ist Fire Protection Inc can not guarantee any specific pressure and flow. If you have any questions, please contact us atjcfireprotection@gmail.com or call us at (510) Possible fire service connection #1 Connection Point Static 135 PSI Residual Pressure 98 PSI Pitot Reading 38 PSI (2293GPM) ejeCTIO c® Q � '.01re �O 1 CIASSiF. CnON n C-16 O ' UCENSENO. * 9WOO */ w \' C I'IIC r Al 26203 Production Ave. Ste. #8 Hayward, CA 94545 - Web: www.jOreprotection.com/E-mail: jcfireprotection a@gmail cc 1 f 1k _ r s _.Legend Alcalde dd Write a description f• • .• i�.f �'.1 :P• . • . h {y r`} r'J c a3k {Y"e` IV 'x . +3t�;+j� �'jy . �, r +i�in"7ar' sic' 1 i ... - .,'r , _ -- ,'•_'° • ' � � iw s •�`' Y Y 1� , lad .�, 10 - iiu'c' ! ,fl+kv { t � � � 4'' � l �.• i.+ �• s ti'. ' : � RAN I i. 1 ..�+'y > `•� : t .t „Y, . - ' IiY..w "-0`t � •-• .�. �.-��'j Y`i".� es.'�. v� s •y y r,. �'.i.. �i a �i���lo�,�, r, ♦!'I. ..fir i6i.. ���/•�"'v �� � ' i iy p, !$,. 'a 6'1 6 10 0 j Vo� _ I .._.. 'pit, • �.Q, r S -':� .. - ■, _ �r'���!'' - ,yam ,�. '� __ ; !• . �1�1-•.� Imo_ .q �� xii�i�lllfn/� s,'�y _ ._ - � t -Santa Lucia Rd 00 WIN ',"f_l I-' C .. � M 1 � '• ` tit 4 n. � i _.. __. ;-, M.M" ' /f"}`-,%K._ "" s.-_. #1-sue •, ,_,f yk' 'l, :✓7 lit gA,`i r L I 200 ft Location of test: Alcalde Rd Cupertino, CA 95014 Hydrant Z-00062 The follow available flow and pressure information is bases on a maximum day demand hydraulic model analysi J&C Safety I st Fire Protection, Inc. This information should be used as a guidance of the approximate available recommended that a design allowance be made for possible reduction in pressure and/ or flow that could occur possible scenarios. Applicate understands that J&C Safety Ist Fire Protection Inc can not guarantee any specific pressure and flow. If you have any questions, please contact us atjcfireprotection@gmaii.com or call us at (510) Possible fire service connection # I Connection Point Static 80 PSI Residual Pressure 55 PSI Pi tot Reading 18 PSI (I595GPM) /0ECTto/y 0 / �15tFlre p`��b y� 1 CLASSIfACTION a � Gt8 p LICENSE N0. -10 * 964500 */ OF 26203 Production Ave. Ste. #8 Hayward, CA 94545 - Web: www.jcfireprotection.com/E-mai/:jcfireprotection@gniai/.ct ;v. ,arm t ,i. • ..\. y1wL t •N�lb �� ./'o.'b 'f• � � ,�,r r� \`\' y7' � 1_ �'•. ••r `,r, k,�, �, �Fj� k.•TT AL Aft 41, - a`i '� May .,11'a (.• -^,� /� J' � � ••��-��r.,,,,, .y. � � ; '}� :Jy�,•� 4 '� Cpl `� � J,`',ti-'� as ,. ...: •a `���� r�,�j/��$;�, _.. �`*_✓�" - f. ',W\i'�t"'.�g'' air ,;�. �Oj tip,' >;r � a. �; . _ 1 �' � ��x �� 1 •, ,'', ., .. � v!.*': aka.-_. ,: �' �" a. �w,� _ _ .S �` .••e,,. L ... I. wA t „ �'.,.... /` ., ;, 1 Yet lY4•^ 46 iz OF t. � ( 4„ 1� .ti,. .4. .f. ,� �� 1 GSA• � +k+rr�� •'' �� , «.1 a,. - � 4'1 '+'rw�•'� 4h�i •�1r ,ga;i�t'�'@.e2`a� r •� , .•y .Y y •A.'�b!4 �l � � 1 f.i ~'Py �018cibgfe �.�w �� _� �.• �. Location of test: Ainsworth Dr Cupertino, CA 95014 Hydrant Z-00379 The follow available flow and pressure information is bases on a maximum day demand hydraulic model analysi J&C Safety 1 st Fire Protection, Inc. This information should be used as a guidance of the approximate available i recommended that a design allowance be made for possible reduction in pressure and/ or flow that could occur I possible scenarios. Applicate understands that J&C Safety lst Fire Protection Inc can not guarantee any specific pressure and flow. If you have any questions, please contact us atjcfireprotection@gmail.com or call us at (510) Possible fire service connection # I Connection Point Static 130 PSI Residual Pressure 100 PSI Pitot Reading 30 PSI (2059GPM) ®�V.l;7lON Q �1SLRe p�ot� �jyi y i CLASSIFAVON p C7 C-16 O UCENSE NO. 964500 \� r ant\ 26203 Production Ave. Ste. #8 Hayward, CA 94545 - Web: www.jcfireprotection.com/E-mait.-jcfireprotection@gmai/.cc Appendix C SJWC 2015 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study K AYU G A SOL UT I ON 61 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study Cupertino Lease Area October 2015 San Jose Water lrmCompany 9sn Jere water Company Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Prepared by San ,dose Water Company Planning Group Andy Yang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer i /3- & CfVt4 Pipeline Consequence o/ Failure Study October Y015 Dam Reviewed by Jake Walsh, P.E. Engineering Unit Manager Bill Tuttle, P.E. Director of Engineering P.E. San Jp6! w.ta EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Company Executive Summary Introduction and Purpose Pipelines are one of the most important assets of northwestern region of the City of any water system and their continual operation is critical to San Jose Water Company (SJWC) 4,200 water services delivering reliable water supply to its customers.2.4 MGD Average D, Demand With the purpose of identifying the criticality of eachmiles of pipeli­il� pipeline, the Planning Group conducted a Pipeline VMPHT srorage Consequence of Failure Study for the Cupertino •"pumps 2 wells Lease Area water system. This -•studyprovides a framework to strategically identify`"` pipeline improvement projects within —the —Cupertino Lease Area. To this end, a methodology was developed which p6mariiy used'hydreul'rc modeling and flooding analysis re5u►ts to quantify_ttte criticality of all pipelines in the water system. Consequence of Failure Evaluation Pipeline failures have a multi -faceted impact on society. In order to quantify the amount of impact a pipeline failure has on society as a whole, it was necessary to identify the primary facets affected by pipeline failures_ The following four impact categories summarized in Figure ES-1 were considered to be the primary impacts. Consequence of Failure Impact Categories Impact on public health and safety due to possible water contamination and flooding, and in some cases due to water service outages Impact on transportation corridors due to flooding of highways, roads, and passenger railroads Business I Impact on commercial and industrial businesses due to service outages Impact and flooding System Operations Impact on the ability to continually operate the water system and Im-pact provide water to users Figure ES-1. Consequence of Failure Impact Categories Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page I I on San Jpae "'ate Company EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hydraulic Modeling Extensive hydraulic modeling was conducted in order to simulate catastrophic break scenarios for every pipe in the Cupertino Lease Area water system. The hydraulic model measured the leak discharge rate out of each failed pipe, potential for water contamination due to low pressures, amount of consumer water demand inhibited due to isolation of the failed pipe, and number of valves needing to be operated to achieve hydraulic isolation for each pipe. Geographic Information System Mapping Spatial analysis played a significant part in the consequence of failure analysis. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping was used as a tool to identify the types of properties, facilities, roads, and railroads within the potential flooding region for each pipe. in addition, GIS spatial tools were used to help identify pipelines crossing critical transmission mains and those essential for water system operations. Results from hydraulic modeling and GIS spatial analyses were input into the consequence of failure evaluation methodology, which ultimately yielded a final consequence of failure score for each pipeline. Figure ES-2 outlines the overall consequence of failure evaluation process. Figure ES-2. Consequence of Failure Score Evaluation Process Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page I i i San Jow "`°'°` Carnpany E.xEcunvE SUMMARY Consequence of Failure Evaluation Results After the consequence of failure score was generated, slt GtS defined pipe segments in Cupertino Lease Area were uniquely ranked from 1 to 1061 and divided into four criticality categories: High (Top 10%), Medium -High (10-20%), Medium (20-50%), and Low (50-100%). Map ES-1 provides a visual representation of the final results for all pipes by criticality category. Recommended Improvements and Actions Findings of the consequence of faikire evaluation provide a baseline for future efforts to identify and prioritize capital improvement projects, Main replacement and rehabilitation project recommendations take into consideration both the consequence of failure as well as the probability of failure, so those recommendations are not included in the scope of this study. However, results of this study did bring to surface the need for a regulator installation, a valve installation, and easement documentation. As previously communicated with the City, SJVV.0 ,,,,requests that the City provide more data felating to pipe type and age _of installation before a comprehensive probability of failure analysis is conducted. Regulator Installation Based on the consequence of failure evaluation results, it is recommended that an 8-inch pressure regulator be installed on the northern border of Cupertino Memorial Park, near the intersection of Christensen Drive and Fenway Court, as shown in Figure ES-3. This improvement will prevent many services from .dropping to low (often subatmospheric) pressures during a catastrophic pipe break and will increase fire -flow capacity. It is recommended that this improvement be implemented in 2017. The estimated cost for this improvement is $117,600. Figure ES-3. Recommended 8-inch Pressure Regulator Installation Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page I iii MAP ES-1. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Results by Rank � �� sari nose Water WCompany 1 N W E S I O I Cristo Ray or Reservoir Ak r s: 3 "yr i Flowering Pear Dr Station!' l HOMESTEAD RD y t Franco Ct Stati • R AN _ J "< •Mann Dr Sta on M ° a J Dialysis and Life Support Rublic ElemenlaryASchool as STEVENS CREEK BLVD STEVENS CREEK BLVD L 41111111'- STEVENS CREEK BLVD i De Anza Community College _ l LEGEND RANK 1 - 106 -> High Criticality (10%) �^ 107 - 212 -> Med-High Criticality (10%) 213 - 530 -> Medium Criticality (30%) 531-1061 -> Low Criticality (50%) Road Type Freeways Arterials Major Collectors Minor Collectors - LocatRoads Critical Facilities Commercial/Industrial Business Industrial Business Commercial Business 6 'r Cupertino Lease Area Limit 1 _ MCCLELLAN ROAD Public Elementary School . Nlercedec Road R,,3er-dopr ��"� .} � �} o P,ubiic High School " - z m a g5 '; J J Public Middle School 0 1 ,500 3,000 Service Layer Credits USGS The National Map National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, Geographic Names Information System,. Na}Ionat.Hyprography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line, HERE Road Data 4;500 6,000 Feet NOTE: Industrial business parcels shown in this map that reside outside of the Cupertino Lease Area were included as part of the Consequence of Failure Analysis because they are served by the Cupertino Lease Area water system. D ,`r7,,; tea✓✓`; � J) y) /lo /i✓�i/)' .tom; `c / Yic ,--j Cs ,'�XrS.'�i✓ L> .e�.4 ��JS /ice iii�r� i ,� 2 rJ�/j-.� �- !./,¢G ✓� '�•`�S �'�F.�f.¢7.a,-d 15` .G7�t-'�,�.� u,ry� Sci.YY► � ��� �� Y S� J"[.�✓ /!Y7%JiF-Doi/��7�'1 �1�� li��� �u"��ii7.�'k'Y'����.J ifa�'a7c.►� �J�l+-r't�, %r' C jr� �rj ja 7XA diC //dS 7i47�G• �d3� /�d r�' /�Jj /C d Tf� O /G sd/t �4r sr�py. /1/c.iN� T"y d � �/�✓,�" .�'�./�1���r .fi¢rv�?f� f -�= z✓c-� ir/��/ /i9�'��'�a/✓c� Han Jose EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Company Valve Installation It is recommended that a 14-inch valve be installed at the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and South Foothill Boulevard, as illustrated in Figure ES-4. This recommendation will decrease the number of .large diameter.valves needing. to beclosedto hydraulically iso4te the 14-inch diameter pipe alignment on South Foothill Boulevard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Alcalde Road to the south. Currently, in the event of a catastrophic break along this alignment, it is estimated that approximately 2 million gallons may be discharged into the surrounding area. However, with the implementation of this recommendation, the failed pipe will be hydraulically isolated within a shorter time frame and the volume discharged will be reduced by up to 400,000 gallons. This improvement is recommended for implementation in 2017 and is estimated to cost $21,900. Figure 1=S-4. Recommended 14-inch Valve Installation Easement Documentation A number of pipes in the Cupertino Lease Area water system are installed within private yards and streets, see Table ES-1. SJWC requests that the City provide plat and legal descriptions, tract, parcel or utility maps identifying easement type and limits as well as water main location within each easement. This documentation would be necessary for any potential pipeline improvements in these areas. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study october2015 Page I v San Jose Water Company Table ES-1. Easement Documentation Request List e ,12-049 10420 CRESTON DR 12-051 7326-13-035 10440 CRESTON DR 12-052 10450 CRESTON DR 10401 VISTA KNOLL BLVD 326-15-076 10370ALPINE DR 326-1S-076 10370ALPINE DR 326-15-076 10370 ALPINE DR 326-lS-076 10370ALPINE DR 326-15-103 22364 SALEM AVE 326-15-130 22445 CUPERTINO RD 326-15-130 22445 CUPERTINO RD 326-16-045 10130 CRESCENT RD 326-16-047 10151 HILLCREST RD 326-16-050 10181 HILLCREST R❑ 326-16-052 10161 HILLCREST RD 326-16-053 10143 HILLCREST RD 326-16-055 10133 HILLCR EST RD 326-16-061 10191 HILLCREST RD 326-16-080 10171 HILLCREST RD 326-17-013 10168 AMELIA CT 326-17-019 10201 A M E LIA CT 326-17-020 10185 AMELIA CT 326-17-026 10171 AMELIA CT _ 326-17-OS3 10151 AMELIA CT 326-18-057 10019 OAKLEAF PL 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD OR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-35-063 10451 PHAR LAP OR 326-35-068 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS, 326-37-004 10391 RIVERCREST CT 326-37-D47 CRESTON DR 326-39-060 SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER 326-41-033 10500 CASTI N E AVE 326-41-095 _ 21291 MILFORD OR _ 326-41-096 21301 MILFORD DR 326-41-097 21311 MILFORD DR 326-41-098 21321 MILFORD DR 326-41-099 21331 MILFORD DR 326-41-100 21341 MILFORD DR 326-41-101 21361 MILFORD DR 326-41-102 21371 MILFORD DR 326-41-103 21381 MILFORD DR Pipeline Consequence of Failurn Study October 2015 EXEcurivE SUMMARY 326-41-104 21391 MILFORD DR 326-41-105 21401 MILFORD DR� 326-41-106 21421 MILFORD DR 326-41-107 21431 MILFORD DR 326-41-108 21451 MILFORD DR 326-41-109 21461 MILFORD DR 326-41-114 CITY OF CUPERTINO 326-47-019 10410 STOKES AVE 326-49-007 10650 STOKES AVE 326-49-018 21887 WILSON CT 326-49-034 STOKES AVE 326-55-023 10315 ANN ARBOR AVE 342-12-063 22615 SALEM AVE 342-12-064 2262S SALEM AVE 342-12-064 22625 SALEM AVE 342-12-064 22625 SALEM AVE 342-12-090 22611 POPPY DR 342-29-057 10495 MERRIMAN RD 342-44-017 10500 SAN FELIPE RD 342-44-020 lOS30 SAN FELIPE RD 342-4S-007 22864 VOSS AVE 342-45-035 10396 AVENIDA LN 342-48-006 22654 OAKCR EST CT 342-48-018 10439 HENEY CREEK PL 342-48-030 -10350 HENEY CREEK PL 342-48-030 10350 HENEY CREEK PL 3 42-57-009 10799 JUNIPER CT 342-57-030 10829 SYCAMORE CT 342-58-003 22238 HAMMOND WAY 356-01-021 10980 MIRAMONTE RD 356-05-005 MC CLELLAN RD 356-06-030 22044 BAXLEY CT 357-01-027 22288BELLEVUEAVE 357-01-033 10168 CASS PL 357-04-029 10494 MIRA VISTA RD 357-06-016 10489 SCENIC BLVD 357-09-053 22120 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 357-10-006 21975 SAN FERNANDO AVE 357-10-008 21979 SAN FERNANDO AVE 357-12-055 10485 SAN FERNANDO AVE 357-20-019 10340 BUBB RD 357-22-006 10106 IMPERIAL AVE 357-22-007 10104 IMPERIAL AVE 357-22-035 10118 IMPERIAL AVE Page I vi San Jose Water Company TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................................................................ 1 TABLEOF CONTENTS ............................................ ........ ....................... ............... ......... ................ I ..................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................... I ............ I ................................ ........................................I............. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND........................................................................ .............1 1.2 OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................................................................................1 1.3 SYSTEM OVERVIEW.— ................................. ........................................................................... ....... ................ 1 2. PIPELINE FAILURE EVENT CHARACTERIZATION, EFFECTS, AND MODE ......................................................... 3 2.1 PIPELINE FAILURE EVENT CHARACTERIZATION............................................................................................................4 2.2 PIPELINE FAILURE HYDRAULIC EFFECTS (IMPACT CAUSES)............................................................................................5 2.3 PIPELINE FAILURE MODE.......................................................................................................................................6 3. PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY.......................................................... 7 3.1 IMPACT CATEGORIES.............................................................................................................................................7 3.1.1 Health & Safety Impact..........................................................................................................................7 3.1.2 TransportationImpact...........................................................................................................................9 3.1.3 Business Impact............................................................................................................................... 3.1.4 System Operations impact .....................................................................................................................8 3.1.5 Impact Categories Summary..................................................................................................................9 3.2 IMPACT CATEGORY MEASUREMENT PARAMETERS AND TOOLS....................................................................................10 3.2.1 Hydraulic Model................................................................................................................ ......11 3.2.2 Geographic Information System(GIS)..................................................................................................11 3.3 PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE SCORING METHODOLOGY...................................................................................19 3.3.1 Health & Safety impact Category Scaring............................................................................................20 3.3.2 Transportation Impact Category Scoring.............................................................................................24 3.3.3 System Operations Impact Category Scaring.......................................................................................26 3.3A Business Impact Category Scoring.......................................................................................................27 4. PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION RESULTS....................................................................29 4.1 RESULTS FOR OVERALLSY57EM.............................................................................................................................29 4.2 RESULTS FOR PIPES AFFECTING CRITICAL FACILITIES, KEY FEATURES, AND SYSTEM OPERATIONS........................................31 S. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIONS.....................................................................................33 5.1 REGULATOR INSTALLATION FOR MANN REGULATED ZONE..........................................................................................33 5.2 VALVE INSTALLATION............................................................................................................................... ....-.35 5.3 EASEMENT DOCUMENTATION...............................................................................................................................35 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page I vii Han Jaue j C*mp CONTENTS ,"O" LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. DAMAGE OBSERVED DUE TO MAIN BREAK LOCATED ON PENSACOLA DRIVE IN THE EASTERN SIDE OF SAN JOSE........................3 FIGURE 2. WORKERS DIVERTING TRAFFIC ON BASCOM AVENUE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO FIX A MAIN BREAK ON A 12" WATER MAIN ........... 4 FIGURE 3. PICTURE ON THE LEFT ILLUSTRATES THE BREAK STAGE OF A MAIN BREAK; PICTURE ON THE RIGHT ILLUSTRATES A REPAIR DURING THEISOLATION STAGE OF A MAIN BREAK........................................................................................................................5 FIGURE 4. PIPELINE FAILURE MODE- COMPLETE SEPARATION....................................................................................................6 FIGURE S. SAMPLE OF GIS RESULTS OBTAINED USING FLOODING BUFFERSAND VARIOUS SPATIAL FEATURES....................................17 FIGURE 6. OVERVIEW OF CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE SCORING PROCESS.....................................................................................19 FIGURE 7. HEALTH AND SAFETY CATEGORY SCORING PROCESS AND EQUATIONS...........................................................................20 FIGURE 8. ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED FOR.ISOLATION FLOW CHART.........................................................................................23 FIGURE 9. BUSINESS IMPACT CATEGORY SCORING PROCESS AND EQUATIONS..............................................................................27 FIGURE 10. PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF CRITICALITY RESULTS BY COUNT AND BY LENGTH...............................................................29 FIGURE 11. BREAKDOWN OF PIPES AFFECTING CRITICAL FACILITIES, KEY FEATURES, AND SYSTEM OPERATIONS..................................31 FIGURE 12. NUMBER OF PIPES BY CRITICALITY AFFECTING CRITICAL FACILITIES, KEY FEATURES, AND SYSTEM OPERATIONS...................32 FIGURE 13. RECOMMENDED 8-INCH PRESSURE REGULATOR AND MANN REGULATED ZONE...........................................................34 FIGURE 14. RECOMMENDED S-INCH PRESSURE REGULATOR AND IMMEDIATE VICINITY..................................................................34 FIGURE 15. RECOMMENDED 14-INCH VALVE INSTALLA11ON.....................................................................................................3S LIST OF MAPS MAP1. CUPERTINO LEASE AREA BOUNDARY...........................................................................................................................2 MAP2. FLOODING BUFFERS...............................................................................................................................................13 MAP3. ALL SPATIAL FEATURE DATA....................................................................................................................................14 MAP4. POPULATION DENSITY....- ................................................. I ..................... ....................................................... _MAP 5. CRITICAL FACILITIES,_COMMERCIALAND INDUSTRIAL BUSINESSES ........ _............................. .............................................16 MAP 6. CRITICALSYSTEM OPERATIONS MAINS AND PIPES INTERSECTING SCVW D MAIN..................................I...........................18 MAP7. RESULTS BY RANK..................................................................................................................................................30 MAP 8. WATER MAINS CROSSING PRIVATE PROPERTIES..........................................................................................................37 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. HYDRAULIC EFFECTS OF PIPELINE FAILURE EVENT........................................................... .............. ................................ 5 TABLE 2. IMPACTS CATEGORIES IMPACT SUMMARY...................................................................................................................9 TABLE 3. QUANTIFIABLE PARAMETERS USEDTO MEASURE IMPACT CATEGORIES..........................................................................10 TABLE 4- TYPE AND SOURCE OF EXTERNALSPATIAL DATA.........................................................................................................12 TABLE 5. TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC...................................................................................25 TABLE 6. SYSTEM OPERATIONS IMPACT SCORINGSUMMARY.......... ............................................ .............................................. 26 TABLE7. CRITICALITY CATEGORIES BY RANK...........................................................................................................................29 TABLE 8. EASEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUEST LIST.............................................................................................................36 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study Oclaber2013 Page I viii San Jose Water Company LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIXA City of Cupertino Land Use Map APPENDIX 6 City of Cupertino Annual Average Daily Traffic APPENDIX C Consequence of Failure Scores and Rankings Table LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic DDW Division of Drinking Water ft Feet GIs Geographic Information System gpm Gallons per minute psi Pounds per square inch SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District s1WC San lose Water Company CONTENTS Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page I ix San Jet. om Cp INTRODUCTION Company 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Pipelines are a critical water distribution system asset and fundamental to virtually every facet of reliable water system operations. Given the magnitude of their importance, it is imperative that excellent pipeline asset management studies and programs be implemented to assure the safety and reliability of water systems for the overall benefit of the customers.. This Pipeline Gonsequence of Failure study will serve as a baseline upon which San Jose Water Company (SJWC) will develop a refined pipeline asset management program. 1.2 Objectives The objectives of the Consequence of Failure Study are summarized below: • Establish an approach for evaluating the consequence of failure for each pipeline • Locate critical facilities, features, and areas of concern • Generate results measuring the consequence of failure for each pipeline by rank Develop a baseline to help strategically identify capital improvement projects that would yield the greatest ratepayer benefit 1.3 System Overview The Cupertino Lease Area is located in the northwest region of the City of Cupertino, encompassing 3.7 square miles which is equivalent to approximately one-third of the city's total area. SJWC has been providing water service to the Cupertino Lease Area for the past 18 years as part of a 25 year agreement. The Cupertino Lease Area water system is composed of nearly 60 miles of pipelines, 4 water storage tanks with a total design storage capacity of nearly 8 million gallons, 5 booster pumps with a total design capacity of 6,300 gallons per minute (gpm), and 2 wells with a combined -capacity of 1,100 gpm. The majority of water supply served to the Cupertino Lease Area comes through a Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) turnout at Mann Drive Station. There are approximately 4,200 water services within the Cupertino Lease Area, totaling an average day demand of over 2 million gallons. Map 1 provides a visual summary of the Cupertino Lease Area water system. Pfpelfne Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 17 MAP 1, CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Cupertino Lease Area Boundary MENSan Jose Water Company W E Ji Ole T z- Cristo Rey Or Reservoir !� Mann Dr Station as - I 11tN STEVENS ;REEK-SL-VD n CUPERTINO'LEASE AREA u LLI MCCLELLAN•ROAD ` Mercedes Road Reservoir �' ) t , --T - r TTLIT 1� u r SA t 3� k r = Flowering Pear Or Station %Franco Ct Station CITY OF CUPERTINO SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY SERVICE AREA 000 7 5 �- 0 2,500 5, 00 10000 , , Feet Service Layer Credits USGS The National Map National Qoundaries Dataset, NaUo�talFJevat<on Dafaset, Geographic aines �foAotigp Syst National Land Cover Database. National StrdAres Dataeet. and National Tfa0pot14ion Datasaf l!_3.,:"s i3ureai 416ER/brip'. HERER( HE LEGEND STATION Water Main All Parcels Cupertino Lease Area Limit Cupertino City Limit SJWC Service Area san Jose w°` Company PIPELINE FAILURE EVENT CHARACTERIZATION, EFFECTS, AND MODE 2. Pipeline Failure Event Characterization, Effects, and Mode Pipefine failure events can occur in many different fashions and magnitudes. Some failures may be as small as a minor leak, but some are catastrophic in nature causing a major disruption to the water distribution system and to the public as depicted in Figures 1 and 2. Before any system -wide analysis on the consequence of pipeline failure could be performed, it was first necessary to clearly define the characterization, effects, and mode of pipeline failures that would be considered for the purposes of this study. 1 Figure 1. Damage observed due to main break located on Pensacola Drive in the eastern side of San Jose. J } ,i Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 13 1 j8a" Jose Ce Pany Pfpam FAiLuRE EVENT CNARACTFR anoN, EFFECTS, AND MODE Comp Figure 2. Workers diverting traffic on Bascom Avenue while attempting to fix a rain break on a 12" water main. 2.1 Pipeline Failure Event Characterization Pipeline failure events and their impacts can be characterized by two stages. The first stage (break stage) is the affected condition of the distribution system immediately after the pipeline break, when water is being discharged from the failed pipe into the surrounding environment. The second stage (isolation stage) is the affected condition of the system while the failed pipe is hydraulically isolated and being repaired. Both stages were considered in this study to capture the entire impact of a pipeline failure event. Figure 3 includes photographs illustrating the two stages. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 14 AUSan Jost m�.y PIPELINE FAJLURE EVENT CHARACTERIL4 TlON, EFFECTS, AND MODE Figure 3. Picture on the left illustrates the Break Stage of a main break; picture on the right illustrates a repair during the Isolation Stage of a main break. 2.2 Pipeline Failure Hydraulic Effects (Impact Causes) When a pipeline fails, there are a few primary hydraulic effects which cause impact to the public that must be considered. During the first stage of the failure event, the additional demand (i.e. water being discharged into its surroundings) creates higher velocities and lower pressures in the distribution system. Another major failure effect during the first stage is the flooding of the surrounding vicinity. The societal impacts of low pressures and flooding that were considered in this study are explained in Section 3 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Evaluation Methodology. During the second stage of the failure event, various valves must be closed (or at least pinched down) in order to isolate the failed pipe for repair. This operation will hydraulically isolate the region contained within the closed valves and will put all of the users within this region out of service. In addition, once the isolation valves are closed, the rest of the water system outside of the isolated region may also be affected due to the change in overall system dynamics. Users outside of the isolated region may experience low pressures and reduced water flow as well. Table 1 summarizes the failure effects that were considered in this study. The societal impacts of hydraulic isolation that were considered in this study are explained in Section 3 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Evaluation Methodology. Table 9. Hydraulic Effects of Pipeline Failure Event Stage.l immediately following pipe break Stage 2 Immediately following isolation for pipe repair • Low pressures • Flooding • Low pressures • Out of service Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 15 San Jose Company APEL1NE FAILURE EVENT CHARACTERIZATION, EFFECTS, AND MODE 2.3 Pipeline Failure Mode There are numerous ways in which pipelines can fail. Failure modes include blowouts, longitudinal splits, wall ruptures/tears, circumferential breaks, joint leaks, perforations, and more. It was assumed for the purposes of this study that all pipes would fail in a catastrophic fashion resulting in complete pipe separation such that there are two points at which water is discharged at atmospheric pressure, as illustrated in Figure 4. Although the vast majority of pipeline failures in the SJWC distribution system are not of this nature o_ r magnitude, it was appropriate to analyze a worst -case scenario for each pipeline. Atmospheric Pressure i t Figure 4. Pipeline Failure Made - Complete Separation Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page I a San Jns "a`°' Company PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 3. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Evaluation Methodology Establishing the methodology for evaluating each pipeline's consequence of failure is the most involved and pivotal portion of this study because, in the end, methodology will determine results. Therefore, it is imperative that the methodology is developed such that it captures all key consequences or impacts that result from pipeline failures and accurately measures them. Various consequence of failure evaluation methodologies have been developed for different water utilities and for research purposes. However, upon review of various studies, it was found that a new and customized methodology was necessary to more specifically evaluate and address the particular needs within the Cupertino Lease Area. This section presents SJWC's customized methodology which is intended to provide an objective and systematized process that will yield quantifiable and justifiable consequence of failure results. The section is structured as follows: • Section 3.1 Impact Categories — Introduction to key impacts that result from pipeline failures • Section 3.2 Impact Category Measurement Parameters and Tools — Discussion of parameters and tools used to measure impacts • Section 3.3 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Scoring Methodology— Explanation of scoring methodology used to develop final rankings 3.1 Impact Categories The following four impact categories encompass what SJWC believes to be the primary societal impacts when a pipeline fails: • Health & Safety Impact • Transportation Impact • Business Impact • System Operations Impact The following subsections provide explanations as to why and how pipeline failures play a role in these four impact categories. 3.1.1 Health & Safety Impact The most critical societal impact of pipeline failures is related to public health and safety. Pipeline failures often create a major drop in pipeline pressures, potentially allowing contamination infiltration into pipes. According to the California Division of Drinking Water (DDW) Waterworks Standards, distribution systems are required to "assure that the minimum operating pressure in the water main at the user service line connection throughout the distribution system is not less than20 podnds>:per square inch (psi) at all times" (Chapter 16, Section 64602). However, in the event of a pipeline failure, pressures often drop below 20 psi, and sometimes even below 0 psi (atmospheric pressure) giving rise to potential contamination Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 page 17 son Imcompany Jos. Water PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY company of the water system. In addition to water quality concerns, pipeline failures can also compromise public safety due to flooding. Depending on the extent of flooding, conditions may be such that the general public is more prone to injuries. Lastly, public health and safety may be impacted due to users being put out of water service while the failed pipe is hydraulically isolated for repair. Pipeline failures can also negatively affect firefighting capabilities, However, due to the momentary nature of pipeline failures and the infrequency of fire events, fire -flow impacts during a pipeline failure were not included as part of this study. 3.1.2 Transportation Impact In densely populated areas such as the San Francisco Bay Area, transportation is a critical component of public life and is heavily intertwined with numerous societal functions. Therefore, it is essential that all corridors related to public transportation such as highways, roads, and passenger railroads be minimally disrupted. Pipeline failures, depending on magnitude and location, can cause major disturbances to transportation corridors due to flooding. 3.1.3 Business Impact Pipeline failures also negatively impact commercial and industrial businesses, possibly resulting in economic loss. When flooding occurs due to a pipe failure, all businesses that require customer or worker access may be temporarily inaccessible, thereby halting or impeding business operations. For example, potential customers of restaurants and shopping centers would be deterred from entering due to flooded conditions in parkingllots, walkways, and building interiors. In addition to flooding, service shutdowns due to hydraulic isolation may also negatively affect businesses. While heavy water -consuming businesses such as restaurants, car wash stations, and certain heavy industries will be most affected, nearly all businesses will be affected as customers and workers will temporarily have only limited or no access to water. 3.1.4 System Operations Impact There are specific pipelines that must remain in service for SJWC to maintain safe and reliable system operations. These pipelines include SCVWD transmission mains and critical pathway pipes that keep important water system facilities operational and hydraulically connected to the system. SJWC relies heavily on SCVWD for its water supply. On an average water demand day, the District treats and delivers approximately 70 million gallons of wholesale water per day to SJWC through their large transmission mains which range from 20-inches to 6.5-feet in diameter in SJWC's service area (20-inches to 48-inches within the Cupertino Lease Area). A catastrophic break in an SJWC main that crosses a District transmission main could potentially result in significant damage to SCVWD's pipeline, This could cause flooding damage and result in water supply shortages to Cupertino and other surrounding communities. Therefore, SJWC pipelines Grossing SCVWD transmission mains are considered critical to system operations. Pipeline Consequence of Feifure Study October2015 Page 18 Can Jose ater PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATIQN METHODOLOGY � Company Critical pathway pipes are defined as pipelines without redundancy that keep major facilities such as tanks and pumps in operation. These pipelines typically include tank inlet/outlet pipes as well as transmission mains located upstream and downstream of pump stations. 3.1.5 Impact Categories Summary Table 2 summarizes the hydraulic effects and practical impacts which were considered in this study that correspond to the four impact categories. Table 2. Impacts Categories Impact Summary Low Pressures • Public exposure to potential water quality hazards due to contamination infiltration Health & • Public more prone to injuries due to hazardous Safety Flooding conditions • Disruption to critical facility operations Out of Service Transportation Flooding Business Flooding Out of Service SCVWD Transmission System Main Damage Operations Critical Pathway Pipeline Outage Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study Ociober 2M • Disruption to critical facility operations • Nigh traffic volume roads/highways and railroads disrupted • Customer access to business prevented • Business operations disrupted • Business operatons disrupted • Water supply shortage • Inability to operate important water system facilities Page19 t San Jose C' p PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Company 3.2 Impact Category Measurement Parameters and Tools Quantifiable parameters were established to measure the amount of impact every individual pipeline failure event has on each impact category. Table 3 provides all of the parameters used for this study, as well as the primary tools used to obtain these measurements for each parameter. Table 3. Q UOntifiable Parameters Used to Measure Impact Categories ImpactParameter .. Number of users (by type) that experience less than 20 psi Low Pressure Hydraulic Model during pipe break stage Number of users (by type) that experience less than or equal Low Pressure Hydraulic Model to 0 psi during pipe break stage Quantity of water lost in gallons per minute Flooding Hydraulic Model Number of valves (by type and size) needing to be closed to Out of Service Hydraulic Model isolate pipe segment for repair Number of users (by type) hydraulically isolated after valves Out of Service Hydraulic Model are closed for pipe segment repair Quantity of water inhibited due to hydraulic isolation when Out of Service Hydraulic Model valves are closed for pipe segment repair Number of non -isolated users (by type) that experience less Low Pressure Hydraulic Model than 20 psi during isolation stage Number of non -isolated users (by type) that experience less Law pressure Hydraulic Model than or equal to 0 psi during isolation stage Number of properties (by type) within flooding region 1 Flooding GIS Road types within flooding regions' Flooding GIS Population density within flooding region Flooding GIS Pipes that cross SGVWD transmission mains Damage to GIS SCVWD Main Critical pathway pipelines essential for water system Critical Pathway GIS operations Pipeline Outage Notes: (1) Certain user types, facility/property types, and roads types are more critical than others. Therefore, all users that would experience low pressures and all properties or roads that would be flooded due to pipeline failure were accounted for according to their type. See Section 3.3 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Scoring Methodology for detail on how these critical users and facilities contributed to the overall consequence of failure score for each pipe. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page 110 San Jam wat°'AjuCpmp°ny PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OFFAILUREEVALUATtON METHODOLOGY As indicated in Table 3, all parameters required in this study for evaluating the consequence of failure of each pipeline could be obtained through the use of the hydraulic model and Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping system. Synergi Waterm was the tool used to measure parameters related to services experiencing low pressures following pipe breaks and outages due to isolation, while ArcGIS° was the tool used to measure parameters related to geographic location such as flooding or proximity to other features. The following subsections explain in detail how these two software tools were used to obtain measurable parameters. 3.2.1 Hydraulic Model In order to obtain results required for the consequence of failure evaluation, SJWC created an all pipes and valves hydraulic model based on GIS data. Pipe segments are assigned a unique ID in GIS and defined as a continuously drawn pipe with the same diameter and work order ID. A pipe segment is only broken by GIS at water main tees, changes in diameter, or when the work order fD changes. Pipe segments are not broken in GIS at valves, hydrants, elbows, or service taps. After importing all facilities into the hydraulic model from GIS, 1-ft resolution elevation contours were obtained from Santa Clara County and assigned to each node. Annual service demand data from SJWC's Billing Department was then geospatially plotted and assigned to the nearest node of the appropriate pipeline. Creating this hydraulic model allowed SJWC to simulate the effect caused by catastrophically breaking and then isolating each pipe segment. 3.2.2 Geographic Information System (GIS) ArcGIS® software can perform various spatial analyses and yield useful information tied to the geographic location of a specific feature. In this study, ArcGIS° was used to tie locations and attributes of each failed pipe to other external spatial data such as parcels, transportation corridors, SCVWD facilities, and population density. Ftooding Buffers Following a catastrophic main break, water may inundate the surrounding area, possibly impacting critical facilities, roads, transportation corridors, businesses, and residential properties. SJWC's Distribution Systems Department identified 50-ft as the inundation limit for most pipe breaks. Therefore, 50-ft buffers surrounding each pipe were developed as potential flooding areas. When flooding intensity (see Section 3.3.1 Health & Safety Impact Category Scoring for an explanation of flooding intensity) was simulated to be greater than twice the average flooding intensity, a 100-ft flooding buffer surrounding the pipe was used as the potential flooding area. Map 2 shows the flooding buffers created around each water main. GIS Spatial Data Spatial data related to parcels, railroads, roads and population density was needed for this study and obtained via external sources as summarized in Table 4 and illustrated in Maps 3, 4 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study Qctober2015 Page 111 11AUCsan4— O �mpany PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OFFAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Co and 5. Map 3 contains parcel, road, railroad, and SCVWD pipeline data, while Map 4 shows the population density distribution. Map 5 identifies critical facilities, commercial parcels and industrial parcels. Parcels were flagged as critical in GIS if they contained hospitals, acute health care facilities, schools, and residential or commercial units where users require uninterrupted water service for dialysis or other life-support equipment. Table 4, Type and Source of External Spatial Data Santa Clara Y. Polygon Santa Clara County aunty Parcels'! i pertino Roads Line City of Cupertino Railroads Line United States Census Bureau - r6pul'ation Polygon Bay Area Census / Metropolitan Density Transportation Commission SCVWD West Pipeline Line SCVWD Using GIS to Measure Parameters Spatial intersection analyses were performed using the flooding buffer surrounding each pipe segment and the feature of interest (e.g. parcels, roads, population density polygons, etc.) in order to obtain a quantifiable value that would ultimately be used to determine the consequence of failure score. Figure 5 provides samples of the data obtained from ArcGISO by using a 50-ft flooding buffer as an example. GIS was also used to identify water mains considered critical to SJWC's operations, as illustrated in Map 6. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 112 OEM Water ,dose MAP 2. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS -Flooding Buffers water Company i; 280 ;,cacti ' trot n �r 71 rT K ii■■■w■f� ■ T--- �t ► [�[IT�s +�i r� 1 +n , rid �ititit rr■ w "' %% _' ywiTlr�:l�If asf:VtiR\SRN +�r# i�1-_�1M= *• %� ? - i %lam .ei w�1'—T ``� I 'w ■ i r � '�RRs ►r •ift i �r;r '.`r' ;�� , �1 rRt w1�r�rJ�liISM ll0►`Ir � -rfi �,�iQ' •. .Will lrfll ,;; IllAirfi</M U''rtl-rrl- • M`�rrw w_ wrri1-- s� rr�ti•11 1,ztit��=�� _-+rfrwr■ ■,arr'tt 'r^'r�1%'w�irwltww, � fty c■ru/ww. ■1 �'`� ' .r■fiww s rrjjr� a•raw 7M\�.0 �► t# !. �r1•.i r"Rf e .`�r� �trI�re=r *13- wrlrlilr� /g rr � w..;. i�t lllJr _■■is '� .�• ,~:•!1' -� ai ■.. w r +Isw ►rrr tlr Ian .r:r Rr.r r... ■ .r++ ■Irrrr tL ,�%ir ■n■nr -- !/ 1. -� �L■r �i! r:Am`r! ftl �!I'r■1l1■ . r-� i11 r 1ltlrtalt /N! ��r �f■ r tsr11/-.� ilr/' 1,4i1=!cltlllli�J�■'" ■. �Itur 2 .� : !rf Iiy qxr-j.., �w r�i.% .� line ru ■� +tl J■IrahNow.r .�+rll• iliMIt#/« itltiltl�IFJ1lt ��• rllJ�ra!:,Ioitwr+r— r 4'lllllllll�i W�I:..� r �lr►�t■r 1._illiwliHlr' ! #/ �r)•w� rM it ��llrlr■M�■��.i! ' •;,� i�r/ 'lsiw•r'tlil�r ".`i�i ■+i■wil lit !tr r/r ■� +41 AN `rw Alm a+~i■ tl� mar ■ !� +rrJllllJttJl_ .. a� 1�,.,. ti '•' lrr� r'�`/#/■. w.■r �,Its!'� ♦-�r'..0 ■rttuco;w !1 D i .��It' A. tttl �rI✓ rrr ...}■/�- rllr Ii■/.=iiiil,�iw t '•�Ilit �---f Iriiilt�irra Rri�;,�. "+r /!/�;=� ■ .J ...f'.,;.q�,_. i r t■litftr /■Itlaf wti� -' r n. �r![wr•w �.;ti a.�• w Ir # R#f/ /,■'.+•rrr �'a`i�llfaYY.rrr+.�,..-•ice a+. ' w_ ■IIIIf�iRfri■r■R�lP■•ra.r,W • r� r r lift.■. / aw r _• a■ rr i1N.� 'r###' 1 ���'�■!1■\��� y�Itllrr,.� r`'' �� ■ �••rlrti■rl_ I Y ■I'ra � + Lei r*� ■11■ a J lsrrl-!sa' 1,011 i,�» ~ f ip 111 s�arrrr' 1i:i1sl� ail, r it .} a\ : • ,r■ rrr! � •.;,�■ t: '\ i,• . �ii _ � y =. Y ON gar:. �i ��i+�� ■■r�iirr#N#t -�, it��Y� ..!►.iiriirluilirin t',, �- .� ��•.:.,*��I`��'T���.�'IjI���♦��!�'i'/ •l 1Y�,.1�i/�'►��� .w��j��%,�,���%■r�1I����A�w'A r:Nl1'1.ir M11 wfry �� .�N r .. 1rflai111rj"• 's+'il►+rrji#\IIN .�iw1 ��►� •u rlt��#�Irrrr .11 i� ► lot \ ✓ ��✓ sr r!r/•r r r = \/lrrRllr sw . tRNN■ ■'-.� RI�1t r4� �� �� f �.'�##�++r+ wK «j`I ±: :� : ��*rrr •`. r r� tiler it��»iar1 a� �' Iir{ii `��� `��: 1~,~-�•'�.'ir r' i '■w rrl+■`� r= '..a1 _/H!i i., +. a����111•�� ��'� •',�� ;1 ,i ITii��tr■r �t;�� it ri■:nulrrisriiii;�� C+`\1! >' i 1�40.-~�'^�� ��,Y~���`.��'1��••;�.��'��;��: ' • +' i, rr, �i[��I�ir:r■r�w>/•t>tt■ttitttrittnlllrr# ;:wssr«rr .�r�«r�� .rry.y�.Iivt■ifI�lilN+tnl.rRrirlrrirr.rroiirlir+liwii/ .r.� _It%lll!l�liall+ ::,r '.'', : ■�f. �� air, IWlw ' / � 1 "'t/il{Iltlllltl►\',' ilt1. i�l.■rr� '- }� •� +:.:.. -..: � �auunrr:nal� �/IIININ/I :R� .+ rll ul ii� �^ rs fa�+rr rw AM s1 #f1#1l/111f1■ rc A� a ^ 111 s\, I�.■riw.. +iinluuna /I�IffIl,i� s+1\� �Z R� �s c■ st11t ■■ lIIaIlirli� ► i l!� ilra�l a aw r ■- a , 1■• II�r111s s. wMa7I rs ■��� ■r,.IRISHnl`�'�� ■ '+��11r[::: ■Inl+r a :1h Is��l ullT!• ��+1 .',,: wuah �� �: i �Al�>,�■�4■M!f:le7�ilf+~'•';r Y �. 'ti' .. � v � .._ ... Mr �j►?!"•3�'i �ti`s r��'., 7 �I�r �� r MAP 4. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Population Density san nose AHi Water Company �h i Y Y � ►i � r � t * i 4 � i 4 y r 1 rr t 85 LEGEND Road Type == Freeways --- Arterials Major Collectors Minor Collectors Local Roads Cupertino Lease Area Limit Cupertino Area Parcels Population Density (Peopletsq mi) 0 - 3000 3000-7000 7000-10000 10000 - 20000 20000-100000 aan Jose MAP 5. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Critical Facilities, Commercial and industrial Businesses Water NUIL: Industrial business parcels shown in this map that reside outside of the Cupertino Lease Area were included as part of the Consequence of Failure Analysis because they are served by the Cupertino Lease Area water system. FIGURE 5. Sample of GIS Results Obtained Using Flooding Buffers and Various Spatial Features Flooding Buffer Interaction with various Features Description of Measurable Parameters Obtained 50-ft Buffer/Population Density Intersect i A spatial intersect between the 50-ft buffer of pipe D5318281 and the I population density layer is observed. Because five population density blocks intersect the highlighted 50-ft buffer, five polygons are created as a result of the spatial intersects. Each of these polygons contains the attributes of pipe D531828 as well as the attributes of each specific density block as illustrated in the summary table below, For the population t3 ! g`"-` density spatial feature the measurable value selected for pipe D531828 is the weighted arithmetic mean of the population density by area. M " Pipe D532828 � Population Density Total Density z Pipe ID Density Block ID Code z Area Intersected (it ) (toWi population/sq mrj BtockArea(ft ) y �x 0531929 60855077012032 7328.33537 6715 5558.122074 0531328 60855077012034 14452.2091 3405 1028.015525 0531828 6065SM012035 0 2612 3958.94872 D53132B 60855077012036 0 805 1598.092481 D531828 W 55077012037 4592.1773 1692 4011,44405 s i `{ i 50-ft Buffer/Parcels Intersect I 76•17 1Q! i 15: 17 100 ,Y,r-17.0� yi7 d'i.711 A spatial intersect between the 50-ft buffer of pipe D531828 and the Santa f - Clara County parcels layer is observed. Because nine parcels intersect the highlighted 50-ft buffer, nine polygons are created as a result of the spatial P Y9 P x7 �; �, i �. .. intersects. Each of these polygons contains the attributes of pipe D531828 as well as the attributes of each specific parcel as illustrated in the summary table below. For the parcels spatial feature the measurable value selected for pipe D531828 is the number and type of parcels affected by the flooding buffer. I� Pipe 0531828 i I Pipe ID APN Section Area of Intersected Parcel (tt) Total Parcel Area €t2 D531828 357-16-�059 452.51 6490 D531828 357-16-149 699.79 8455 D531928 357-17-099 666.01 5054 D531928 357-17-100 336.72 4850 D53182S 357-17-101 221.44 5026 13531828 357-17-111 55.27 6668 D531828 357-18-002 378.70 13471 D53182B 357-13-039 3064,27 7033 D531828 357-18-040 1 2648.50 6313 50-ft Buffer/Road Type Intersect 1 A spatial intersect between the 50-ft buffer of pipe D531698 and the Cupertino Roads layer is observed. Four different road types are found within the highlighted 50-ft buffer. As a result, the intersect tool reports on each of these 4 road types and ties their attributes with those of pipe D531698 as illustrated in the summary table below. For the Cupertino ----------_ __ .___ Roads spatial feature the measurable value selected for pipe D531828 is the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)2 of the highest traveled road eteu�lraduFr. �w affected by the pipe. SD�r .I 'r ttt j Pipe ID Road Ty a Road Name Total Length Intersected ft D531698 Arterials STEVENSCREEK BLVD 23.91 D531699 Loral Roads PENINSULAAVE 59.138 D531598 Major Collectors STEVENS CREEK BLVD 76.13 D531698 Minor Collectors B'UBBRD 1005.65 \-- j Pipe D531598 11 4, i Pipe 0532145 50-ft Buffer/Railroad Intersect A spatial intersect between the 50-ft buffer of pipe D532145 and the Cupertino Railroads layer is observed. Four different road types are found a within the highlighted 50-ft buffer. As it is illustrated, a segment of the Union Pacific Railroad is contained within the 50-ft flooding buffer for pipe < D532145. The final measurable value selected for pipe D532145 would be a 1 indicating pipe D532145 does affect the railroad. IL NOTES: Far a definition of Pipe Segment see Section 3.2.1 Hydraulic Model (2) Annual Average Daily Traffic is explained in Section 3.3.2 Transportation Impact Category Scoring MAP 6. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Critical System Operations Mains and Pipes Intersecting SCVWD Main ���w t r �ase Company IT-. ...;! 941 N - r � , { f '94 -._. - fiw ...tom _ - � - r,•a t Cristo Rey Dr Reservoir 9 Mann D(.Station a +� 0 t J + m - J _ J p W 00 1,500 3,00 STEVENS CREEK 4f STEVENS CREEK BLVD MCCLELLAN ROAD ervoir R f m ♦' s� m o � A � Service Layer Credils USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dateset, National Elevation DatssM..'Gecgraphio Nantes Win ��• Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National. Transportation Dataset, LI.S Certsi ition System, Bureau - TIC Ct Station �0 STEVENS CREEK BLVD t -- T' r 85 J J W Nati at ERIL . HERE Road UT Flowering ?ear Dr Station LEGEND Critical Systems Operations Main Pipes intersecting SCVWD Main --- Water Main SCVWD West Pipeline Road Type — Freeways Arterials — Major Collectors Minor Collectors Local Roads SJWC STATION Cupertino Lease Area Limit Cupertino Area Parcels San .lose wet Company PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 3.3 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Scoring Methodology A two-step process was used to obtain consequence of failure scores for each pipeline. First, the parameters listed in Table 3 were used to calculate scores for each impact category for every pipeline. Then scores for each impact category were weighted and combined to yield the consequence of failure score for all pipes. Figure 6 illustrates the overall scoring process. The following subsections provide explanations of the scoring process for each impact category and for the overall consequence of failure score. Consequence of Failure Scoring Process CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE SCORE Figure 6. Overview of Consequence of Failure Scoring Process Pipeline consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page119 San Joss Wale, PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE of FAILURE EVALUAnoly METHODOLOGY Company 3.3.1 Health & Safety Impact Category Scoring The Health & Safety impact category is the largest contributor to the overall consequence of failure score, accounting for 50 percent of the total weight. The overall process and methodology for calculating the Health & Safety impact category score is presented in a flow chart in Figure 7. Following the flow chart is the discussion and rationale for the methodology. Ic ealth and System ) + 0.Conse tlenCe O Transportation Businessf 0.5Safety + 0.2 Impact + p,2 Operations 1 Impact FaUttre Score Impact Score Impact Score Score Score Health &Safety Impact Score = 0.75 (Water Quality Score) + 0.25 (FloodpScore) WQ Score = Service WQ Score 1W:Q Score = 2 x Node WQ Score Flooding Score = (Initensity) x log (P Denlsityn 1 Yes No service WQ Score 7 0 ? �- — Service Water Quality Score = (#o f services between + 2 #o f services l 0 and 20 psi ) ( 5 0 psi Node Water Quality Score = # of nodes <_ 0 psi Discharge ime Unttl Flooding Intensity = ) x Rate Isolation Figure 7. Health and Safety Category Scoring Process and Equations The Health & Safety impact category score can be separated into a water quality component and a flooding component, as these are the two major impact causes associated with the general health and safety of the public. There is also a third component, the "out of service" component which results from hydraulic isolation. However, this third component was only considered in special cases, particularly when critical facilities requiring constant water service were placed out of service. These special cases were handled separately and are further discussed throughout this subsection. The water quality component and flooding component contributed 75 percent and 25 percent, respectively, to the total weight of Health & Safety impact category score, as shown in Equation 3.1. The methodologies used to obtain water quality and flooding scores are described in the following subsections. Health &Safety Impact Score 75 (Water Quality Score) + 0.25 (FloodingScore) (3.1) Pipeline Consequence of Faifune Study october2015 Page 120 Saompany n Joaa Water PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY C Water Quality Score Service Water Quality Score For each pipe, the water quality score was determined based on the number of services that would experience between 0 psi and 20 psi, and the number of services that would experience less than or equal to 0 psi during the break or isolation stage of a pipeline failure event. Each service experiencing between 0 psi and 20 psi contributed one point to the water quality score, and each experiencing less than or equal to 0 psi contributed two points to the service water quality score, as shown in Equation 3.2 below. (#of services between} (#of services Service Water Quality Score = l 0 psi and 20 psi / } 2 k c 0 psi ) (3.2) Hydraulically isolated services that did not drop below 20 psi after the pipe break (i.e. before isolation) do not contribute to the water quality score_ The rationale behind this was that hydraulic isolation does not negatively affect water quality because, although isolated services drop to 0 psi, isolation is a controlled event. Before an isolated pipeline is put back into service, the necessary protocols (e.g. flushing) will be taken to ensure only high quality water is provided to users. However, if a service elsewhere in the system that is not hydraulically isolated drops below 20 psi or 0 psi as a result of the isolation of the failed pipe, it will contribute to the water quality score. If no services dropped below 20 psi in both the break and isolation stages, the service water quality score was equal to 0. In these cases the node water quality score was considered. Node Water Quality Score_ In some cases, areas of the water system without services may experience low pressures due to a pipeline failure. Should there be contamination infiltration into these parts of the system, it is still possible for contaminated water to be conveyed toward users' services. In order to account for these potential cases, the number of hydraulic model nodes that would experience less than or equal to 0 psi were considered for the node water quality score, as shown in Equation 3.3. Only nodes with pressures at or below atmospheric pressure were included as part of the node water quality score because of the unlikelihood of water quality at a service being negatively affected due to pressures below 20 psi but above atmospheric pressure in a remote area. Any minor contamination infiltration would likely be disinfected by chlorine residual before the water reaches any service. Node Water Quality Score = # of nodes c 0 psi (3.3) Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page i V San Joao Company PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OFFAILuRE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Water Quality Score In cases where the service water quality score was greater than 0, the service water quality score was used as the water quality score. When the service water quality score was equal to 0 (i.e, no services were affected by low pressures), one-half of the node water quality score was used. Only a half of the node water quality score was used because, although contaminated water may be introduced into the system at atmospheric or sub -atmospheric conditions, the chlorine residual may disinfect the contaminated water in the time it would take to reach users services. Equation 3.4 shows the process for determining the water quality score. After a water quality score was calculated for all pipes, the scores were scaled such that the maximum score was equivalent to a value of 1. Service WQ Score , Service WQ Score > 0 Water Quality Score = j Z x (Node WQ Score) , Service WQ Score = 0 (3.4) Critical Facilities Pipes affecting critical facilities by lowering their service pressures below 20 psi due to a pipe break had their scores elevated to the maximum water quality score of 1. In addition, pipes that took critical facilities out of service during the isolation stage were also given the maximum water quality score of 1. Although isolation is not typically a water quality concern, because it is a serious overall health concern for critical facilities requiring constant water service, it was considered a reasonable cause for score inflation. Ftoodinq Score For each pipe, the flooding score was determined based on estimated flooding intensity and population density of the estimated flooded area. Estimated Flooding Intensity Flooding intensity resulting from a pipe break is difficult to approximate as it is dependent on numerous factors. However, it can be roughly approximated as a function of the discharge rate of the pipe break and the time it takes to isolate the failed pipe, as shown in Equation 3.5. Flooding Intensity = (Discharge Rate) x (Time Until Isolation) (3.5) The discharge rate for each pipe break was attained from the hydraulic model (see Section 3.2.1 Hydraulic Modeo, and the time required to respond to and isolate each failed pipe was approximated based on the pipeline emergency response procedures and practices of SJWC's Field Service and Distribution Systems Departments. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study dctober2015 Page 122 San Jow '""" PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY canpny Typically, when SJWC is notified of a water teak, it may take a Field Service worker up to 45 minutes to respond and arrive at the site of the break for investigation. If the Field Service worker is able to close the valves by hand (i.e. when valves are not larger than 8-inch gate valves or 12-inch butterfly valves), then it will usually take up to 10 minutes to close each valve. However, if valves cannot be closed by hand (e.g. larger valves) the Field Service worker will contact the Distribution Systems Department to have a truck dispatched. It may take up to 45 minutes for the truck to arrive onsite, and it may take up to 15 minutes to close each of the remaining valves. The flow chart used for deciding the approximate required time for isolation is shown in Figure 8, (! SJWC Notified of Add 45 min for Field Main Break ! Service Response' I 'All Gate valves-, Yes B"and Butterfly �, Valves _;12 ? Add 45 min for Distribution System 1 i ! truck dispatch and r' arrival Notes L_---•_---- �_.__� (1) Field Service response time of 45 min assumes SJWC is notified outside of working hours, (2) This pathway assumes that all gate valves 58" and butterfly valves 512" in diameter are closed by Field Service by the time the Distribution System truck finishes its work. However, if takes longer for Field Service to close the smaller valves than it does for the Distribution System truck to be dispatched and close the larger valves, then the time it takes to close the smaller valves should be used. Add 10 min per valve Failed Pipe Isolated Figure 8. Estimated Time Required for Isolation Flow Chart Population Density Add 15 min per Gate Valve >8" and Butterfly Valve >12" 2 Flooding occurrences in densely populated areas will have a greater impact on general public safety. The average population density associated with each pipe was estimated based on the intersection of the population polygons and the Hooding buffer of each pipe. See Section 3.2.2 Geographic Information System (GIS) for more detail on how the population density for each pipe was estimated. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page] 23 Ban Jose cC—P.ny PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Flooding Score The flooding score for each pipe was calculated by multiplying estimated flooding intensity by the logarithm of the estimated average population density in the vicinity of the pipe, as shown in Equation 3.6. The logarithm of the population density was used for a more even distribution. After the flooding scores were calculated for each pipe, they were scaled such that the maximum flooding score was equivalent to a value of 1. Flooding Score = (Flooding Intensity) x log(Population Density) (3.6) Critical Facilities Pipes affecting critical facilities due to flooding had their scores elevated to the maximum flooding score of 1_ 3.3.2 Transportation Impact Category Scoring The Transportation impact category is a large contributor to the overall consequence of failure score, accounting for 20 percent of the total weight. The score ioT this impact category is calculated solely based on flooding of public transportation corridors. The City of Cupertino categorizes their road types similarly to the United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration's classifications. Table 5 tabulates the City of Cupertino road types along with their estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). The AADT is defined as the total volume of vehicle traffic in a year divided by the number of days in a year, in units of vehicles. A map provided by the City of Cupertino with the AADT values for major roads is included in Appendix B. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study ocfober2015 Page 124 San Ja" Water Company PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE oFFAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Table 5, Transportation Corridor Annual Average Daily Traffic 265,000 (Route 280) California Department of Freeway NIA NIA 222,000 (Route 85) Transportation 2009 Traffic Census Arterial 34,860 36,800 35,800 City of Cupertino Major 10.850 20,640 15,700 City of Cupertino Collector Minor 3,300 14,580 8,900 City of Cupertino Collector US Department of Local 80 700 400 Transportation Federal Highway Administration Notes: (1) 2009 Traffic Census data was used because the AADT data from the City of Cupertino for arterials, major collectors, and minor collectors are primarily from 2009. This allows for a fair comparison between the two datasets and more representative relative values. (2) The United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration provides general AADT ranges for various road classifications. In order to determine the amount of impact each pipeline failure would have on public transportation, flooding areas for each pipeline were geospatially plotted and overlaid with roads and railroads (see Section 3.2.2 Geographic Information System (GIS) for more detail on flooding areas). Each pipe was given a score equivalent to the AADT value of the highest traveled road affected by the pipe. For example, a pipe affecting both an arterial and a major collector would receive a score of 35,800. One exception, however, was that only half of the AADT value for freeways was taken into account because of the unlikelihood of flooding both sides of freeways with center dividers. After the transportation corridor scores for all pipelines were assigned, scores were scaled so that the maximum score was equivalent to a value of 1. Passenger Railroads Pipes that affected passenger railroads due to flooding were given the maximum score of 1. Although passenger railroads would likely not affect as many people as freeways, the impact would be great because trains are typically unable to take alternate routes to get to their destinations, and any railroad damage could require extended repair times. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2095 Page 125 an $a J� j W"" Company PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 3.3.3 System Operations Impact Category Scoring The System Operations impact category accounts for 20 percent of the total consequence of failure scoring weight. This impact category score takes into account pipelines that are necessary for the continual operation of the water system. Pipes that cross SCVWD transmission mains were considered critical to the overall operations of the water system, as SJWC relies heavily on these transmission mains for water supply; these pipes were given a score of I. In addition, critical pathway pipes without redundancy that are essential for the operation of pumps or tanks were also given a score of 1. Table 6 presents the scoring summary for the system operations impact category. See Section 3.1.5 System Operations Impact Category Scoring for more information on the System Operations impact category. Table b. System Operations Impact Scoring Summary Pipe crosses SCVWD transmission main andlor is a . critical pathway pipe 1 Pipe does not cross SCVWD transmission main and 0 is not a critical pathway pipe Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 126 $all Jo water Company PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OE FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 3.3.4 Business Impact Category Scoring The Business impact category accounts for 10 percent of the total consequence of failure score weight. The overall process and methodology for calculating the Business impact category score is presented in a flow chart in Figure 9. Following the flow chart is the discussion and rationale for the methodology. (Health and) System. Consequence o (Transportation) :ullne�= 0.5Safety + 0.2 Impact 0.2 Operations +,0.1 IFailure Score Impact ImpactScoreScore Score Business Impact = 0.6 (Out of Service Score) + 0.4 (Flooding Score) Category Score Out of Service Score to Commercial and Industrial + 1l g_�__ ._ Inhibited Demand FFI,,di7zgScore = #o f Commercial and Industrial Properties Affected Figure 9. Business Impact Category Scoring Process and Equations Out of Service Score The Out of Service score, which is a measure of business impact due to a water service outage, was based on inhibited demand. The inhibited demand is equivalent to the average day demand (in gpm) of the services placed out of service, which can also be understood as the amount of water that would have been used by businesses had there been no service outage. The equation used for the Out of Service score is as follows, in Equation 3.7: Out of Service Score - log Commercial and Industrial + 1) (3.7) Inhibited Demand A small number of commercial and industrial services with very high demands create a skewed and uneven demand distribution. Therefore, the logarithm of the demands was used for a more even distribution. A value of 1 was added to the demand before the logarithm was taken in order to avoid negative Out of Service scores and also to ensure that pipes which did not affect Pipefine Consequence of Failufa Study October2015 Page 127 San Jose ►Peter 00.p.ny PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY commercial or industrial demands would receive a score of 0 (i.e. 1,og(0+1)=0). After the scores were obtained for each pipe, the results were scaled such that the maximum value was equal to a value of I . Flooding Score The flooding score for the business impact category was equivalent to the number of commercial and industrial parcels affected. A parcel was considered affected if it was at least partially within the flooding region of the pipe. Equation 3.8 presents the equation used to calculate the flooding score. #o f Commercial and Industrial Flooding Score = properties Af f ected (3.8) After the flooding scores were obtained for each pipe, results were scaled such that the maximum score was equivalent to a value of 1. Business Impact Category Score The overall Business impact category score is equivalent to the weighted sum of the Out of Service score and the flooding score for each pipe. The Out of Service score was given a 60% weight, and the flooding score was given a 40% weight. The flooding score was given a lower weight than the Out of Service score because of the higher degree of uncertainty with flooding. In the event of a pipe break, there is uncertainty as to where the break will occur along the pipe, and there is also uncertainty as to the exact destination of the discharged water. Nevertheless, because a large flooding st;enario would leave a relatively long-term negative impact on businesses, a weight no lower than 40% was considered appropriate. Equation 3.9 is the equation used to obtain the overall Business impact category score for each pipe. Business Impact ^ 0.6 (Out of Service Score) + 0.4 (Flooding Score) (3.9) Category Score After the scores for each pipe were calculated, they were scaled such that the maximum score was equivalent to a value of 1. Freight Railroads Railroads exclusively used for freight transport are critical to numerous industries requiring the transport of goods. Because pipes that impact freight railroads due to flooding would have a large impact on many businesses, they were given the maximum business impact category score of 1. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2095 Page 128 San Jose wa: G°mpsnpy PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE FVALUATIoN RESULTS 4. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Evaluation Results 4.1 Results for Overall System Every pipeline in the Cupertino Lease area was evaluated according to the methodology explained in Section 3.3 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Scoring Methodology and ranked based on the calculated consequence of failure scores. Pipes with identical final scores were prioritized according to their flooding intensities. Results were grouped into four criticality categories as shown in Table 7. Figure 10 shows the breakdown of the four criticality categories by pipe count and by pipe segment length. Table 7. Criticality Categories by Rank High 1 - 106 Top 10% Medium -High 107 - 212 10 - 20% Medium 213 - 530 20 - 50% Low 531 - 1061 50 -100% Criticality Results by Count Criticality Results by Length Medium Mediu 30% 33% Med-High Med-Hij 10% h 12°h Figure 10. Percent Distribution of Criticality Results by Count and by Lensth A compiled summary of the impact category scores, final consequence of failure scores, and final rankings for all pipes in the Cupertino Lease Area is included in Appendix C. Final results for all pipes by rank are geospatially presented in Map 7. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page 129 MAP 7. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Results by Rank XJJJ San Jose Water Company N W E S LEGEND a. s � 1� 4 M 1 Cristo Rey Dr Reservoir RANK - 1 - 106 -> High Criticality (10%) 107 - 212 -> Med-High Criticality (10%) 213 - 530 > Medium Criticality (30%) 531-1061 Low Criticality (50%) Road Type Freeways Arterials Major Collectors Minor Collectors Local Roads Critical Facilities Commerciallindustrial Business Industrial Business Commercial Business ! wa Cupertino Lease Area Limit Flowering Pear _Dr Stationlri HOMESTEAD RD ~ - Franco Ct Static __ - r --• � t ` era ..� r #. Mann DkStation . o - Dialysis and Life Support Public Elementary,,Schoot i4• 1 o - 85 ' 1,'1 STEVENS GREEK. BLVD STEVENS CREEK B r i i T� v gTEVENS CREEK BLVD De Anza Community College - .�_ 4 .r IL t M NACCLELLAN ROAD I ry tl t Public Elementary School j "i -edos Road Rc�Sery )ir t © L j Public High School x �. i S zLu ``f' c 85 `' ,11 ! r Public Middle School. f a- pw r o 1 T500 3;0 4,60-0 s 00 Service Layer'Credirs USGS The National Map' National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydra$raphy i Feet Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line, HERE Road Daly — I NOTE: Industrial business parcels shown in this map that reside outside of the Cupertino Lease Area were included as part of the Consequence of Failure Analysis because they are served by the Cupertino Lease Area water system. San Jaso '""°" PIPELINE CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE EVALUATION RESULTS comp■y J 4.2 Results for Pipes Affecting Critical Facilities, Key Features, and System Operations The following results summarize the number of pipes affecting critical facilities, key features, i and system operations clue to water quality impact, flooding, or placing services, tanks, or pumps out of service. Results indicate that 9 pipes affected a critical residential unit requiring constant water service for life support, 103 pipes affected schools, 8 pipes affected freeways, 22 pipes affected freight railroads, and 39 pipes affected system operations. No hospitals, acute health care facilities, or passenger railroads were found within the Cupertino Lease Area. See Figure 11 for a visual breakdown of the number of pipes affecting these key features and ? operations. 1 1 Count of Pipes Affecting Critical Facilities, Key Features and System Operations 120 100 o m 4p 20 } p �oy� e�aG 5��� Qa��o �aOto �ia�`o �6 ye;.W1 l 1 Figure 11. Breakdown of Pipes Affecting Critical Facilities, Key Features, and System Operations J 1 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 131 $an Jo W Waterse Company PlpEvNE CONSEQUENCE aFFA1LUREEVALUATtON RESULTS Pipes affecting critical facilities, key features, and system operations predominantly fell within the high or medium -high criticality categories. Figure 12 shows the breakdown of criticality categories for pipes affecting critical facilities, key features, and system operations. Dialysis / Life Support f 9 10 c 3 r u _ a 4 d' rr f Z Q.--.--..—.o..._-._._.__..._._ High mea-reign Meaium Low Criticality Freeways High Med-High Medium Low Criticality Freight Railroads Schools 100 85 75 m 50 j a °' 25 0 ` High Med-High Medium Low Criticality System Operations 40 /' 30 T-- 0 u 20 .0 10 0 High Med-High Medium Low Criticality 15 l 12 4+ C � 0 10 6 u ai a 5 a —�j 0 �! High Med-High Medium Low Criticality Figure 12. Number of Pipes by Criticality Affecting Critical Facilities, Key Features, and System Operations Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Page 132 A�San Joao "'Mp RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIONS Company 5. Recommended Improvements and Actions The results and findings of this study are intended to provide a baseline to help with future efforts to identify and prioritize pipeline capital improvement projects_ 'Definitive maim replacement and rehabilitation projects are. not ,included ias, part of this study. SJWC requests that the pity of Cupertino proVrde more pipe type and age of installation data before a comprehensive probability of failure analysis is conducted for the development of definitive pipeline improvement projects. However, the results of this study did bring to surface the need for a regulator installation, a valve installation, and easement documentation. 5.1 Regulator Installation for Mann Regulated Zone Mann Regulated Zone is located within the northeast portion of the Cupertino Lease Area. Although most pipes within Mann Regulated Zone do not affect any critical facilities, key features, or businesses, nearly all of them fell within Medium -High and Medium criticality categories. The cause of these results is that Mann Regulated Zone was designed with only one regulator station as the sole input .into the ;zone. Therefore, when there is high demand in the zone due to fire flows or a pipeline failure, nearly all services in the regulated zone drop to very low -pressures, ;often to subatmoepherie-pressures, regardless -of which pipe fails. Therefore, SJWC recommends an 8-inch pressure regulator be installed on the northern border of Cupertino Memorial Park, near the intersection of Christensen Drive and Fenway Court. This improvement will prevent many services from dropping to low pressures in the event of a pipeline failure and will also increase fire -flow capacity to help meet current fire department flow requirements. Figure 13 shows the location of the proposed 8-inch regulator in relation to Mann Regulated Zone, and Figure 14 shows the regulator in relation to its immediate vicinity. This improvement is recommended for implementation in 2017 and is estimated to cost $117,600. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page 133 8 u i San Ja "'a'" Canpalry RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND AGTIONS iLegend Q Proposed Regulator O Existing Regulator Existing Zone Valve I— Pipeline - Mann Regulated Zone — Pipeline Mann Station 4 Proposed 8-inch regulator will allow water into Mann Regulated Zone to keep pressures higher in the event of a main break or file �:- r— m:ro ks.dn.«...gg:.Sir�e n Figure 13. Recommended 8-inch Pressure Regulator and Mann Regulated Zone Figure 14. Recommended 8-inch Pressure Regulator and Immediate Vicinity Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page, 34 Son Jop WaterRECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIONS Cnmpeny 5.2 Valve Installation A 2,200-ft long, 14-inch diameter pipe alignment on South Foothill Boulevard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Alcalde Road requires 7 valves to be closed to achieve hydraulic isolation, 4 of which are greater than or equal to 12 inches in diameter. In the event of a catastrophic break anywhere along this alignment, it is estimated that approximately 2 million gallons could be discharged into the surrounding area. However, with the installation of a 14-inch valve at the intersection of South Foothill Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard, only two valves greater than or equal to 12 inches in diameter will need to be closed, thereby decreasing the time required to hydraulically isolate the alignment and reducing the volume discharged by up to 400,000 gallons. Therefore, it is recommended that a 14-inch valve be installed as illustrated in Figure 15. This improvement is recommended for implementation in 2017 and is estimated to cost $21, 900. Figure 15. Recommended 14-inch Valve installation 5.3 Easement Documentation It was found that a number pipelines within the Cupertino Lease Area cross through private property yards and streets. SJWC requests the City of Cupertino provide documentation defining the limits of the easements, as they would be necessary for any potential pipeline improvements in these areas. Map 8 highlights the location of these pipelines and Table 8 lists APN's and addresses of parcels that intersect these pipelines. Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October2015 Page 135 4' S; San J— water .A _ _r' Sf Company Table S. Easement Documentation Request List A P 326-12-049 Address 10420 CRESTON DR 326-127051 10440 CRESTON DR 326-12-052 1045D CRESTON DR 326-13-035 10407 VISTA KNOLL BLVD 326-15-076 10370ALPINE DR 326-15-076 10370ALPINE DR 326-15-076 10370ALPINE DR 326-15.076 10370ALPINE DR 326-15-103 22364 SALEM AVE 326-15-130 22445 CUPERTINO RD 326-15-130 22445 CUPERTINO RD 326-16-045 10130 CRESCENT RD 326-16-047 10151 HILLCREST RD 326-16 050 10181 HILLCREST RD 326-16-052 10161 HILLCREST RD 326-16-053 10143 HILLCREST RD 326-16-055 10133 HILLCREST RD 326-16-061 10191 HILLCREST RD 326-16-080 10171 HILLCREST RD 326-17-013 10168 AMELIA CT 326-17-019 10201 AMELIA CT 326-17-020 10185 AMELIA CT 326-17-026 10171 AMELIA CT v 326-17-053 10151AMELIA CT 326-18-057 10019 OAKLEAFPL 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-27-037 10145 PARKWOOD DR 326-35-063 10451 PHAR LAP DR 326-35-068 SOUTHERN PACIFICTRANS. 326-37-004 10391 RIVERCREST CT 326-37-047 CRESTON DR 326-39-060 SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER 326-41-033 10S00 CASTINE AVE 326-41-095 21291 MILFORD DR 326-41-096 21301 MILFORD DR 21311 MILFORD DR _326-41-097 326-41-099 21321 MILFORD D_R 326-41-099 21331 MILFORD DR 326-41-100 21341 MILFORD DR _ 326-41-101 21361 MILFORD DR 326-41-102 21371 MILFORD DR 326-41-103 21381 MILFORD DR Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2016 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIONS A'a 326-41-104 Address 21391 MILFORD DR 326-41-105 21401 MILFORD DR _ 326-41-106 21421 MILFORD DR 326-41-107 21431 MILFORD DR 326-41-108 21451 MILFORD DR 326-41-109 21461 MILFORD DR 326-41-114 CITY OF CUPERTINO 326-47-019 10410 STOKES AVE 326-49-007 10650 STOKES AVE 326-49-018 21887 WILSON CT 326-49-034 _ STOKES AVE 326-55-023 10315 ANN ARBOR AVE 342-12-063 22615 SALEM AVE 342-12-'064 22625 SALEM AVE 342-12-064 22625 SALEM AVE 342-12-064 22625 SALEM AVE 342-12-090 22611 POPPY DR 342-29-057 10495 MERRIMAN RD 342-44-017 10500 SAN FELIPE RD 342-44-020 10530 SAN FELIPE RD 342-45-007 22864 VOSS AVE 342-45-035 10396 AVENIDA LN 342-48-006 22654 OAKCREST CT 342-49-018 10439 HENEY CREEK PL 342-48-030 10350 HENEY CREEK PL 342-48-030 10350 HENEY CREEK PL 342-57-009 10799 JUNIPER CT 342-57-030 10829 SYCAMORE CT 342-58-003 22238 HAMMOND WAY 356-01-021 10980 MIRAMONTE RD 356-05-005 MC CLELLAN RD 356-06-030 22044 BAXLEY CT 357-01-027 22288 BELLEVUE AVE 357-01-033 10168 CASS PL 357-04-029 10494 MIRA VISTA RD 357-06-016 10489 SCENIC BLVD 357-09-053 22120 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 357-10.006 2 1975 SAN FERNANDO AVE 357-10-009 21979 SAN FERNANDO AVE 357-12-055 10485 SAN FERNANDO AVE 357-20-019 10340 BUBB RD 357-22-006 10106 IMPERIAL AVE 357-22-007 101041 MPEMAL AVE 357-22-035 10118 IMPERIAL AVE Page136 MAP 8. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE ANALYSIS - Water Mains Crossing Private Properties an jose Water �'�� Company N W E S r / Cristo Rey Dr Reserv;4 `4 �w N r' ?SBrV STEVEtIS CREEK SLVD i I- i I Milo 4N,1 iw e'er ! ii 4 STEVENS CREEK MCCLELLAN ROAD 1 M O i — � ��_zr.•:.-{ffr�k....a..,s-_es /'� '"'' ce . -" �I` � ar:.3.'� Q ,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 Feet Service Layer Credits, USOS The National Map, National Boundaries Dataset. National Elevation Dataset, Geographic Names Information National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset• U.S Census BureaL--TLGERILlne, HEF 9 85 m ( 85 ❑ in co z J 111 s- v National Hydrography Dataset. t Data Pear Dr Station co Ct Station or R=.EK BLVD t: 4 �y ' $ 4 ��rr {fit LEGEND Pipes crossing Private Properties Water Main Road Type — Freeways Arterials Major Collectors Minor Collectors Local Roads SJWC STATION Cupertino Area Parcels + i _+ Cupertino Lease Area Limit San Joae Water Compaey Appendices Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Sm Jtseo Mill W.- i Canpany APPENDIX A City of Cupertino Land Use Map Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2al5 S:n MdcNo C.aniye.a i SwiI to i 20 A.S Drc- 14 urn � Ifniicnliall2aelnpmmt e a iw Hatuw+rya..� r- T,W Unit use &—t.:a Im lamp aR,ln; tts 14l'url+.i�wrvae area elrall Ln eoi,srsle+,l,a- . -i&tlaAl d,—Ii,•w—ablohed by the Carney !wr144-4m lienektlelan ',, ar•� qwe n�• K�Il1nN GGAf. lit Ne.I3i4,.OnS+ '�l 5, �=ate•'—'L � _ Il 1•(MIHViUF-. 1 a�mge_y'ttkdaa:tA m i _ _. _ I it l �! I •i I j� �� I . I i .-- j' Il _` --- - _ I_ � YI l I \ �i'_ ) S5 `<i L �\ 1 -n.•r - ��J-__ fi_ r_ 1 '' 'Il,i li �`!_ �I I, IIF •i �• I I I I l II �I -.- -- .! L w.dad .erllm l �v 1 �r~ ��I —! I'• I� � I I,I `— J^f; ��.—,� "•11 �. 1. �I _.__ll� .—= I� I: I a MDFANz. _ - � I City of Cupertino 3 Land Use Map cufrflrrnlo Non -Residential LmdUsc Designalioae Legend c n n ,tat , rstrir a / P—i 1.1 a lJ1ltv:eruil _' 14,sidtnliai Ci1S&,-d.U iK>z dvatn•.. ' Commeraal; Frri,lc�nt[d 7J rl fw Hwrora,eCity c]:n._ Reaidv,di•I iniuu Spa(al Center Rounduivs )ndnslla)/C •,d+•+,:tal!Cummen;._ L1rbld Serve Aru. thinl:c E.ohl— ® Spl,i•[C Ol failbeace Que>i—"vbH.' I moon-.�,I — Cnrta ©Q�nni-Pnbl'¢ / lh.tltudanol-i, erlA; IS I lcmtiag Denl,in Site ® P.A. and O4'an Sp.. ��F'"•+nc-nrr+der ItesidenlialLaadUseDesl atio � es U T,anq,n•6ition t:r-Lo Bw -dy P 20 Ara, 51o1M Dennly Forme'.) O G•,nly Qt'ery Sn- @•n..ily (1- 7 A—S)op: Dnaiq F+,rmdal hiontaVista Und Use Desigaa(ions r;n_ :nw Dwua� (sl,p` on,snyFerm+dA] D-5 Du; Ae) �W, Dessit)Il-AVWAG)ltuxh.,kiin •d• Cjlr:xirl-ln:(-I.+a7DU40 ! _j:— Mvd— D—ur(}te!lU!A,) O R1 idm,u: (-1412130/Ac.) P.43,cm (111-M 01)1 Ac) - P—de:dtel11U :5 DL','Ac) 4tei Dews+(20 a5 DD; .40 ul+k,ighharh 4e:em—.1 tRer•.den:iAl Hie.l. Density (1,14 Dl'/Ac) Sikes destgnalyd ©am Pr9ttily Hlx45mg Sites as idenbG d In ttw adoptod Htnuing Element Cummer. inl a,eas ill n&$hborhnods have a residential dsslly or 15 DU, AC- Nulwdhstrrnding the detsibas shown above, sites are devgluted a5 F'nnnt, I lunsmg.Sites m the adopted Housing hlemeln s1ra0 have tLr duaities 6hnwn im the lious(ng fiiente 1. Cu kvid pmpernes In live Htmrs. toad Spmial Areaexcept those an thi• South ci&of R—ovad bet-- De Anm and 5tellmg ha,•eA density of'15 DU/A,,. p 0.55 Ptepared by the Codununily Deoalopm, nt ➢epart—t Mfsn, Adefdml; Nowstbcr15, 21115 Amended, February 12W, 2015 o g oi}}e. -L Atrey a6eaend l enuuV ouipedno jo Aji3 8 xiaN3ddV sioz•agapo ,fpngg alnpe.Ijo aouenbasuoo auiledid duedwoo lellm xor ueg 280 3.300 e,b60 3,360 (3.2009) 2,000 4.030 2,030 (3.2009) i u 7,940 7,380 16,390 - - - - L750 - - _., - - (� .450 9,370 20 O) (42009) t1i 7� a w F-F d c U m, I I HOMESTEAD RD. U4I 0 10,640 I 9,4ab 10,790 - - 2) 10 i 8,750 • - � a,900 �.., � 10.740 � � 21,590 c2: �70 20,330 .6 U.85a I0,850 11,G30 10.8G2 J0,820 8,150 i` (4.2009) (2,2007) (.42009) 00 °' (1.2013) 0 K m .� N } PRUNERIDGE AVE, ry Wi FQ' - - - - 4.4GO N R O 0 G0 to 9,900 0'! N o 5.040 Qa N N vi (3.7009) gee 0 VALLEY GREEN DR - I O 0 O 1 c n cum ni::, 0 o 00 v' W c01 0 Lr;C N N N CJ rry N G ol Al VHS DR a STEVENS CREEK BLVD, 5 640 10,850 10.570 20,640 34,8636,800 1745le4 19,200 ^' + 770 31 ,140 5,2 c 0 10,070 J 7,0 I(111 0 1 (IO.Z012){2.2D08) 5,370 (5.2009) (`a.2009) mm 0 0� v m 'i 1111 1l9 nj ori:: 3 960 6,470 RD. 8.140 -- 13.23dLLAN 4,0(3.2C05) 2,240 4.510 2,270 (3.2009) n L61 o o°o m 6? O oro v 0 600'f2001 2400' 480W Graphic Scale 1 .858 515 a,o i � RAINBOW DR. )•200 (2.oG71 N - �Lnf� 07 O In N - N N N N 6.764 i 3,863 7.199 (2,2W7) '780 2G2❑ 84 C (3. FU091 2,720 5,290 P,570 (3.2009) PROSPECT RD. 3,900 7,420 3.520 (4.2009) PKW V I ,630 2,850 1,250 o (3,2009) N 3 I I J 2,050 n .� N i 2,360 "1s rc - - 15,300 14,906 30,400 31 .845 25,250 26, 10 y r� tiO 15,100 16,939 13,7.00 13,730 110 2012) (10.2012) (3.2009) (2,2007) I 1,750 0 0 m o o c a 3.660 RODRIGUSSAVE O si. (P I-. N ti ai O in 67 n 1.650 N N Yj N N wn I PACIPICADR 2,050 +1 r * X 4,210 m m o0 O O O c> 2,1 GO _ ., Q Coll_ N �i N � 8,04 I 5,704 7,663 (2.20071 o 0 og x+ r o _ - v I Q` � 9.100 � i0,260 S009 L,S80 ) (5.2009 CITY OF CUPERTINO SCALP: V . 24W 2009 01010C w Q BQT , ..1-V" -r Er lJ = Freeway & Expressways = Arterials �- = Major Collector Minor Collector = Average Daily Traffic (ADT) (typically a Wednesday) rVcuwn90 &'5 (0.0000) DATE pp {Od OV 6n Nlj $u1c: I:Z56{(Ann791 AvySf OpmrA 190cr_ San lose Water Company APPENDIX C Pipeline Consequence of Failure Scores and Rankings Table Pipeline Consequence of Failure Study October 2015 Pipeline Consequence of Failure Scores and Rankings Table Pipe10 Di712 Length (ft) Floodlad Intensity 1931) Impact Cateav y Consequence of Failure hnpactSL- Health & safe Transportation Business system Operations D532S20 107 1,268,042 0.B756 0.1414 1,0000 1-0000 0.7661 1 D531685 121 637 803,565 0.8134 1.0000 0.0956 00000 0.6162 2 0532529 121 181 779,5861 0.8283 0.3225 1.0000 0.0000 05787 3 D531717 121 120 792.9161 1.0000 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.5645 4 D531672 101 111 649,809 1-0000 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0-5645 5 D531689 101 31 1,230,7011 D.8719 0.1414 1.0000 0.0000 D.5642 6 D533109 12 52 1,985,3101 0.9572 0.1414 0.3780 0.0000 0.5447 7 D530938 14 667 1,847,905 0.9350 0-1414 0.2817 0.0000 0,5240 _-_ a D542 51 14 77 2,038,245 0.9263 0.1414 0,2817 MOW 0.5196 9 D530939 12 35 1,969,425 0.9399 0.1414 0.1878 0.0000 0-5170 10 0531989 10 8 615,731 1.0000 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.5160 11 D531890 6 36 505,441 1.0000 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.5160 12 D531896 6 53 494,360 1.000 0.0902 0.0000l 0.0000 0.5160 13 D531395 6 1271 456,025 _ 1.0000 0.0802 0.00001 0.0000 0.5160 14 D531992 61 16 417,053 10000 0.0802 D.0000 0.0000 0.5160 15 0531916 6 1.35 414,540 1.0000 0.0802 _ _ _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.5160 16 D531897 8 680 389,632 1.0000 0,0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.5160 17 0531898 6 411 363,936 10000 0.0902 0.0000 0.0000 6.5160 18 0531994 6 295 291,278 1.0000 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.5160 19 D540881 16 161 1,577,040 1.0000 _ 0-0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.5007 20 D540873 16 264 1,572,2041 1.0000 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.5007 21 0531369 151 798 1,524,780 1-0000 0.0036 MGM 0.0000 0.5007 22 0540879 61 28 1,000,812 1-0000 0.0036 00000 0-0000 0.5007 23 D531368 6 242 598,776 1.0000 0.0036 0.00(101 0.0000 0.5007 24 D531563 8 850 353,269 1.0000 0,0036 0.00001 0.0000 0.5007 _ 25 D531687 12 10 915,474 0.8311 OS225 0.09561 0.0000 0.4896 26 D532531 12 211 742,266 0,9204 0.3225 _ 0.0956 D.0000 OA842 27 D532060 12 97 1,374,909 0.8843 D.1414 0.0939 010000 0-4799 28 D532530 8 24 711,119 0.8206. 03225 0.0482 0.0000 _ 0.4796 29 D532527 12 8 776,2461 0.8280 0.3225 0.0000 D.0000 0.4785 30 D531686 6 39 613,9471 0.8044 0.3225 0.1071 0.0000 0.4774 31 D532528 8 31 721,667 0.8222 0.3225 0.0047 0-0000 0.4761 32 0532070 12 233 1,420,860 0.8941 0.1414 0,0000 0.0000 0,4753 33 D542774 12 24 768,893 0.8198 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0,4744 34 D535914 12 326 767,151 a8191 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4741 35 D531682 121 479 765,504 0.8182 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 04736 36 0532176 12 6 1,404,297 0.8900 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.4733 37 D532177 12 61 1,405,580 018699 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.4732 38 0532127 12 50 1,406,619 0.8895 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0A730 39 D532062 20 20 1,377,513 0.8884 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.4725 40 OS42773 12 6 716,436 0.8150 0.3225 0.000ol 0.0000 0.472D 41 0542775 12 15 711,996 0.8146 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4718 42 D542784 12 15 740,421 0.8144 _ _ 0,3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4717 43 D542772 12 24 6944,728 0.8 130 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4710 44 D542777 12 20 726,017 0.8130 0.3225 0.0000 _ D.O000 D-4710 45 D531680 8 6 692,2441 0.8129 0-3225 0.0000 0.0000 0,4709 46 0532DSS 12 10 1,221,2641 0.8652 0.1414 0-0939 0.0000 0,4708 47 D531974 12 203 1,399,236 0.9841 0.1414 0.D000 0.0000 0.4704 48 0542776 12 24 714,137 0.8114 0.3275 0.0001)1 0.0000 0.4702 49 D532128 12 46 1,345,181 0.8831 0,1414 o-00001 0.0000 0.4699 50 D531673 12 550 678,659 0.8093 0.3225 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.4692 51 D542790 8 24 650,556 0.8090 0.3225 0.0000 0,0000 0,4590 52 D531671 12 108 664,119 0.8088 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4689 _ 53 D532071 12 906 1,321,3921 0.8804 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0-4685 54 D531684 12 42 787,992 0.8074 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0A682 55 05320S9 12 91 1,1S4,220 0.8603 0.1414 0.0939 010000 04678 56 0532178 12 228 1,270JR81 0.8775 0.1414 0.0000 0.000D 0,4671 57 D532512 61 24 865,641 0.9331 0.1414 0.2213 0.0000 0,4670 58 D532065 12 519 1,242,708 0.8761 0.1414 0.0000 0,0000 0.4664 59 D531681 12 38 816,684 0.8002 0.3225 0.0000 0.0DDD 0.4646 60 0532513 12 120 958,398 0,8420 0.1414 0.1275 0.0000 0.4620 61 D532522 12 199 953,639 0-8416 0.1414 0.1275 0.0000 0.4618 62 D532069 8 316 1,156,476 0.8667 0.1414 0.0000 0,0000 0.4616 63 D532523 12 334 940,320 0.8407 0.1414 0.1275 0.0000 0.4614 64 0531668 8 396 479,795 0.7928 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4609 65 D532020 a 171 1,150,295 0,8632 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.4599 66 D532525 8 23 862,410 0.8346 0.1414 0.1275 0.0000 04583 67 D540980 16 ig 1,577,868 0.9117 0.0036 0.0000 10000 0.4566 68 0532066 8 776 1,041,984 0.8531 0.1414 O.DDOD 0.0000 0 4548 69 D531398 16 590 1,558,992 OAD36 0.0.6 0-0000 0.0000 0.4525 70 D532526 12 52 900,9131 0.9402 0.14141 0.0336 0.0000 0.4518 71 Noe. Pipes with identical Consequence of (allure scares were pr{aritlzed nccordina to thax flood i ne lnWnsRies. Plpe tU Ofameter length tin) Ittj Hooding intensity l of 1 mpact [ateogry Consequence of Failure impact5core Health & Safe Transportation Business system Operations D532511 8 32 692,493 D.8155 0.1414 0-1275 0.0000 0.4493 72 D532191 Z 48 185,976 0.7669 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0-4479 73 D532194 2 481 186,543 0.7661 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0,4475 74 D532192 2 48 165,312 0.7650 0.3225 0,0000 00000 0,4470 75 D532190 2 48 165,264 0.7650 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.4470 76 D531976 8 14 892,441 0.8364 0.1414 _ 00000 0.0000 0,4465 77 DS32147 16 24 1,251,348 0.2730 0.0000 1,0000 _ _ 1-0000 0.4365 78 OS43109 16 12 1,522,824 0.8570 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.4292 79 D532187 10 6 973,032 08553 0.003E 0,0000 0,00001 U.4284 80 D531833 10 315 952,104 0.8519 0.0036 0.0166 0.0000 0.4283 _ 81 D543108 16 24 1,518,012 0.8535 0,003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.4275 82 0532146 16 163 1,301,040 0.2509 0.0036 1.0000 L0000 0.4262 83 D531873 10 350 916,908 0.8489 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.4252 84 D531888 10 311 632,121 0,8155 0.0902 0.0000 0.0000 0.4238 85 0531885 10 93 904,527 0.8450 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.4232 86 D531961 8 344 _ 821,232 0.8373 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,4194 87 0531879 10 8381 851,756 0.8364 0-0036 0.0000 00000 OA199 88 D531891 10 3221 839,592 0.8359 00036 0.0000 _ 0.0000 04187 89 D531860 81 327 801,012 0.8346 0,003E 0.00001 0.0000 0.4180 90 D531BS2 10 10 880,908 0.8304 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.4159 91 0600356 17 1,094 99,677 0.0188 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.4094 92 D542783 12 24 714,380 0.3120 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.4067 93 D600337 17 1,477 51,887 0.0078 1.0000 0-0000 1.0000 0.4039 94 0531676 12 329 641,172 0.8055 O.OD36 0.0000 0.0000 0.4085 95 DS31675 12 41511 617,520 0.8054 0.0016, 0-0000 0,0000 0.4034 96 D600384 17 3,6001 48,928 0.0065 L0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.4033 97 D531367 6 _ 226 424,656 0.7933 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.3974 98 D531677 6 100 470,700 0.7908 0.003E 0-0000 0.0000 03961 99 0581366 6 283 385,332 0.7859 O.OD36 0.0000 0.0000 03937 AD D542781 8 4 351,618 0.7819 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3910 101 D531382 14 12 1,455,276 0,3693 0.0036 0.0000 1.0000 0.3854 102 D532195 _ _ 2 48 196,476 0.7662 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.3838 _ 103 D532145 16 136 1,187,544 0.1249 0.0000 _ _ 1.0000 1.0000 0.3624 194 D533110 8 271 1,356,924 0.5826 0.1414 0.3780 0.0000 0.3574 105 0532144 16 741 1,651,415 0.6439 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.3503 106 0532117 8 210 987,712 0.0912 0,0036 LOOM 1A000 0.3463 107 053162D 8 1,968 .137,700 0.2514 1.0000 _ 0.1970 0.0000 0.3454 10_8 D534695 16 _ 6 1,470,816 0.6234 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.3400 109 0534684 16 24 1,470,288 0.6222 0.1414 0.0000 0-0000 0.3394 110 D532152 14 27 1,539,670 0.6140 0.1414 _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.3353 111 D531345 16 485 1,457,436 0.6671 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,3342 112 T602760 10 38 1256,703 0,2663 0,0036 00000 1.0000 0.3339 113 D531151 20 763 2,594,940 0.2635 0.003E _ 0.0000 1.0000 0.3325 114 D531095 16 249 1,357,824 0.2567 0.0036 0.0000 1.0000 0,3291 11 D531637 8 132 428,820 0.0247 0-0902 1.0000 1.0000 0.3284 116 D532170 8 227 537,453 0.0547 0.0036 100001 1.0000 0.3280 117 0531387 14 199 1,536,312 0.6247 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.3130 118 D530942 14 539 1,932,660 0.5213 0,1414 0.1878 0-0000 0.3077 119 0531346 8 270 1,056,108 0.6061 0.0036 0-0000 O.00DO 0.3038 120 D600412 17 1,601 46,706 0.0055 O.OD36 1.0000 1.0000 0.3035 121 0531102 14 38 1,599,075 0,5471 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 03018 122 D531105 16 194 1,434,404 0.5231 0.14141 0.0000 0.0000 0.2893 123 D531103 14 353 1,614,168 _ 0.5146 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.2856 124 D600351 17 1,007 100,790 0,0188 0.3225 O.00OGJ 1.0000 0.2739 125 D602851 17 309 99,939 0.0175 0,3225 0.0000 1.0000 6.2732 126 0530923 14 394 1,588,829 0-4733 0.1414 UODO 0.0000 0.2650 127 0531100 16 2S3 1,580,904 0.4716 0-1414 0.0000 0.0000 0,2641 128 T603403 20 6 1,623,720 01178 0,0000 0.0000 L0000 0-2589 129 T603399 20 120 1,894,924 0,11421 00000 0.0000 1.0000 0.2571 130 603393 20 14 1,603,056 0.1130 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 02565 131 603396 20 22 1,632,936 _ 0.1085 0.0000 0.0000 10000 0.2542 132 0531385 14 223 1,493,092 0.5033 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2524 133 D532168 8 396 982,980 0.5012 0.0016 0.000D O.ODOO 0.2513 134 D531344 8' 57 1.364,449 0.S002 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2508 135 D530905 14 384 1,S86,777 0.4421 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.2493 _ 136 0530936 14 429 1,620,068 0.4R471 D.1414 0-0000 0.0000 0.2406 137 D531061 10 471 277,215 0,0762 0.0036 0.000o 1.0000 0.2198 138 D531786 8 698 126,650 0,4646 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.2330 139 D531108 8 499 922,860 0.4077 01414 _ 0.0000 0.0000 0,23211 140 0542702 SO 522 321,000 0.0603 0.0036 0.0000 1-0000 3.2309 141 0531150 6 1,132 285,890 0.0527 0.0036 0.0000 OOOG 0.2271 142 D530945 12 543 1,454,604 0.3367 0.1414 0.2841 0.0000 _ 0.2250 143 D531381 8 56 1,293,264 0,4478 0.003E 0.0060 00000 0.224E 144 mote: Riper with identnal Conic gvcnce of FAINN 5cmes were prioritized according to their f loodIng intensities. Pipelp Diameter Length (ini (ft) Flooding Intensity (gall Impact cateogry Consequence of Failure Impact Scare Health d. Safe Tronspartation Business Systefn 0 eratlons D531147 10 1,309 576,612 0.0477 0.0036 0.0000 1,0000 0,2246 145 Q531O44 10 330 1,323,459 03923 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0,2244 146 0544257 10 279 491,970 0.0393 0.0036 0.0000 1.0000 0.2204 147 D531193 20 492 2,128,824 0.4372 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2193 148 D530903 8. I67 1,212,368 0.3808 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0,2187 149 D531771 8 342 117,1150 0-4356 0.003fi 0.0000 0.0000 0.2185 ISO D534683 10 1,253 225,612 0-0354 6.0036 0-0000 1.0000 0.2184 151 0531128 16 22 1,396,572 0.4319 0.0036 0.0000 010000 0.2167 152 D531275 20 827 1,966,968 0.4314 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2164 153 D532987 16 127 1,897,760 0.4265 0,0036 D-0000 O.O000l 0.2140 154 0531799 10 S90 195,2Z8 0,0253 1.0000 OMOO 0.0000 0.2127 155 D531119 16 161 1.392,396 0.4234. OA036 0.0000 0.0000 0.7124 156 D532151 20 16 21124,576 0,4228 0.0035 0,0000 0-0000 0.2121 157 b532986 16 233 1,391,400 D.4221 0.0036 O.DODO 0.0000 0,2118 158 D602870 12 12 109,400 0.0207 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.2104 1-99 D531129 16 24 1,393,094 0.4159 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.2087 160 D532999 16 4 1,382,892 0.4151 0.0036 0.0000 0,0000 0.2083 161 0531602 8 1,106 63,317 0.0144 110000 0.0000 0.00DO 0.2072 162 D531378 12 12 1,091,507 0.4123 0.0036 0.0000 6.0006 0.2069 163 D531279 20 20 2,188,661 0.4089 0.0036 0,0000 O.00DO 0.20S2 164 D602868 1 12 11 87,896 0.0088 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.2044 165 D531384 14 340 1,464,57133 0.4068 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2041 166 D532596 8 2,500 65,08 0.0069 LOOOO 010000 0.0000 02035 167 D531123 16 166 1,391,936 0.4052 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,2033 168 D602872 12 13 46,IZ31 0.0055 10000 0.0000 L0000 0.2028 169 0532998 8 27 1,218,2881 0.4027 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 D.2021 170 D536144 12 347 469,296 0.0014 0.0036 D.0000 LOOOD 0.2014 171 D531785 8 271 110,010 0.4006 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2010 172 D531054 12 1,440 493,776 0_0014 D.oO00 0.0000 1.0000 0.2007 173 OS31052 12 471 559,020 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 L0000 02004 174 D535147 12 957 287,194 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 LOOOD 0.2002 175 603407 6 8 419,088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.2000 17E T603410 6 3 290,692 6-D000 0.0000 0000 1.0000 0.2000 177 602321 12 76 220,320 0.0000 OA000 0.0000 1.0000 0.2000 178 T60232G 12 34 192,780 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10000 0.2000 179 T603416 6 113 149,279 O-.0WO - O.ODDO 0.0000 L0000 0-2000 18 0531159 20 492 2,860,320 0.3979 0,0036 0,0000 0.000o 0.1997 181 D531707 8 630 107,100 0.3973 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1994 182 0531121 16 261 1,374,516 03953 .0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 01984 183 053072 I2 411 1,280,316 03369 0,1414 0.0000 D.D000 0.1967 184 D531098 16 240 1,516,644 0-3910 0.0036 0.0D00 0.0000 0.1962 185 D531232 14 453 1,862,760 03548 0.0902 0.0000 O.ODOO 41934 186 0531172 10 17 1,811,0701 0.3514 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1918 187 OS32158 10 34k1,762,S60 5,470 0.3490 0.080Z 0.000O 0.0000 0.1905 188 D531593 8 85359,531 02S18 0,3225 0-0000 0.0000 0.1904 189 D531126 lfi 524,436 0.3790 0.0036 0.0000 eoom 0.1902 190 0531127 16 244,706 0.3788 0.0036 0,6000 0.000D 0.1901 191 T602842 8 36,357 0.3751 O 36 0.0000 0.0000 0.1883 i.9Z 0531278 10 1833,257 0.3747 O.D036 0.0000 D.0000 0.1881 193 T602845 8 115,560 0.3694 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,1854 194 D531166 10 3899,110 0.3315 0.0802 0.00DO O.00OD 0.1818 1-45 D532160 14 321,840 03312 0.0802 0.0000 O.ODOO 0.1815 196 D530940 fi 365,265 0.2570 0.1414 0,1885 0.0000 0.1756 197 D5321,59 ID 122,S60 0.3189 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1755 198D530944 12 2339,084 0.2920 0.1414 0.0025 0.0000 0.1745 199 0531153 20 3112,3900.3467 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1741 200 0532629 8 299,1,464 0.3467 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1741 201 D531772 8 269 126,557 03467 0.0036 0.0000 0.0006 0-1741 202 D531769 8 211 109.695 0.3456 D,0036 D.0000 6.6660 0.1735 203 602854 8 6 926,373 0.3457 0.0000 0.0000 D.0000 0,1729 204 0531770 6 383 101,070 0,3426 00036 0.0000 0-0000 0.1720 205 D531160 10 255 1,917,940 0.3421 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1718 20E D531973 a 273 940,236 0.2842 0.1414 0:0000 0.0000 0.1704 207 D540382 6 45 979,620 0.3268 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1641 208 D531230 14 347 1,773,790 0.2959 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 01640 269 TW2863 84 7 797,601 0.3255 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1627 210 0531231 14 812 1,790,325 0.2902 0.0802 0.0006 0.0000 0.1611 211 D531099 8 350 1,044,077 0.3202 0.0036 0.0000 0.01100 01608 212 D532111 8 20 465,200 0-3181 O.GQ361 0.00001 0.0000 0.1598 213 D531794 6 1,107 99,870 0.3151 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1582 214 0531146 4 Sfi 600,156 0.1160 0,0000 10000 6.0000 0.1580 215 D532022 10 258 657,552 0.1140 0,0036 1.0000 O.OpO1 0.1577 216 0531200 20 638 2.045.06 D.3107 0.0036 0.0000 Q.OWO D.1561 217 Note'Pioes with Identical Con-eu-nr Falirn -..,..o,..i,.,:w A __-____.__ ID Diameter (in) Length ft F[oti ing Intensity { al Neakh & Safe Impact Cateow Transportation Business System Operations consequence ° of failure Impact5core 74 8 319 122,655 0 3092 O.DD36 0.0000 0.0000 0.1553 218 10 8 688 384,180 0 2759 0.0802 0.0000 D0000 0.1540 219 J:53 90 8 1,285 105,203 0.3054 00036 D.0000 0.0000 0.1534220 83 8 417 106,538 0-ID43 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.2529 221 60 8 i64 175,824 0.3031 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 01523 222 82 l0 508 1,371,885 0.2711 0.0807. O,00D0 0.0000 0,1S16 223 0 8 46 618,808 0.3012 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1513 224 12 8 795 457,842 D.2577 0.0802 0.0601 0.0000 0.15099 10 8 177,540 0.3000 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.1507 226 7 10.5 265 177,120 0.2993 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.15D4 227 5 10 728 677,492 0.2668 0,0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1494 228 D511779 I0 405 176,520 0.2950 D.DD36 010000 0.0000 01482 229 0531759 8 S31 176,244 0.2930 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1472 230 0531780 10 1621 174,216 0.2929 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1472 231 D531773 6 4101 110,203 0.2897 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,145E 232 D531778 8 386F 170,904 0.2890 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 01452 233 0531611 8 1381 363,773 0,2577 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1449 234 D531154 10 45 2,279,005 6.2871 0.0036 0.0000 00000 0.1443 235 D531767 8 262 107,175 0.2856 00035 0.0000 0.0000 0.1435 236 D531584 6 1,817 83,819 0.2518 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1419 237 D543089 10 6 164,483 0,2823 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1419 239 Q531776 8 417 108,015 0.2810 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1412 239 D531768 6 25 101,588 0.2796 9.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1405 240 D531178 10 9 1,540,710 0.2461 010802 O.DODO 0.0000 0.1391 24 D531781 8 168 149,698 0.2763 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1389 242 D531796 6 25E 157,764 0.2772 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1386 243 0531792 10 81 149,520 0.2757 0.0036 0.0000 O.DDDD 0.1386 244 D53I791 6 119 138,29 0.2750 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 D.1382 245 D511782 8 563 105,878 0,273E 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.1375 246 0531761 6 341 105,435 .0.27361 0.0036 0 0000 0.O00D 0.1375 247 D531766 8 270 105,983 0,27341 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1374 248 D531763 8 254 105,503 0.2732 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0,1373 249 D531106 6 621f 519,420 0.2732 (woo 0.0000 0.0000 01373 250 0531762 6 1491 100,463 0.2693 0.0036 E0 000 0.0000 0.1354 251 0531793 10 561 143,000 0.2689 0.00.46 0.0000 0.0000 0.1352 252 D531765 fi 240 99,fi15 - 0,2694 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1349 253 D531775 6 330 97,305 0.2680 0,0036 0.000D 0.0000 0.1347 254 D531764 6 233 98,80S 0.2672 0.0036 D_0000 O.OD00 0.1343 255 D532631 8 384 647,532 0,2668 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1341 256 0531110 6 563 594,240 0,2307 ' - 0.1414 0.0000 0_0000 0.133E - 257 D532635 6 28 573,317 0.2633 0.003E O.OD00 0.0000 0.1324 258 Q531698 8 971 378,781 0.0322 0.3225 _ 0.517E 0,0000 0.1324 259 D532166 6 573 205,811 0.2605 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,131 260 D532633 8 123 616,78E 0.2598 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.3,30E 261 D531969 12 271 1,434,186 0.2037 0.1414 0.0000 D_00DO 0.1301 262 D531968 12 298 1,414,274 0.2009 0.14-1 0.0000 0.0000 0.1287 263 D531638 8 395 430,826 0.0243 0.0802 1A000 0.0000 0.1282 264 D531650 8 711 87,645 0.2549 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1282 265 D531251 6 52 1,321,005 0.2220 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1270 266 D531945 6 615 385,378 0.2521 O,Q036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1268 267 D531627 8 1,111 435,782 0.0214 0,0802 1.0000 0.0000 0.1268 268 0532167 2 481 167,136 0.2500 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.1257 769 OS31621 8 3071 372,204 0.0178 0.0802 L00DO 0.0000 0.1249 270 D530978 10 32C 1,441,7118 01170 0,0802 Q0000 0.0000 O-IZ46 271 D531556 8 1,189 392,627 0.2476 0.003E 0,0000 0.0000 0,1245 272 D531623 8 441 2I3,248 0.0111 0.0802 1.0000 000001 0.1216 273 D531802 10 2 137,792 0.2432 0.0000 DAg00 0.0000 0.121E 274 D531005 10 2,089 1,128,948 0.1671 0.1414 0.0939 0.0000 01212 275 D531642 5 172 87,983 0.2395 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,1205 276 0531622 8 319 182,700 0.0084 0.0802 1.0000 0.0000 0.1202 277 D531051 8 1.,690 124,066 0.0082 0.0802 1.0000 0.0000 0.1201 2 D542765 8 1B 171,848 0,0072 0.0802 1.0000 0.00001 O.i197 279 D531616 8 25 170,513 0.0072 0.0802 LOODD 0.0000 0.119E 280 0532139 20 9 1,431,948 0.2060 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.1190 281 0531002 10 53 1,437,012 0.2055 0.0802 0 0000 0.0000 0.1188 282 053ZI97 2 48 66,660 0.0029 0.0802 1.0000 0.0000 D.1174 293 V532052 10 346 940,080 0.1158 0.1414 0.3071 0.0000 0.1169 284 D53111B 8 520 619,710 0.1736 0,1414 0.0000 0.000t 0,1151 285 D530985 10 201 1,386,396 0.22S4 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1134 286 D530979 10 17 1,450,224 0.2222 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.1118 287 D532923 8 3 405,594 0.2182 0.003E 0.0000 DA000 0.1098 268 0532157 1{) 2 1,475,685 0.2180 D.Og36 0.000Q O.QD00 0.1047 289 0532921 8 59 403,431 0.2178 0-OD36 0.0000 O.nnnn n_ttwr )on NOW. Pipes wMi Went —I Consequence of Failure Scares were W brittaed Pipe Information Cons Fimcling Diameter Length Intensity Health& PR a ID (in) (It) (gal) safety the. flooding tntemttles. Impact Cateogry Consequence Transportation Business System of failure 0 eratloM ImpactScon 05309A7 8 498 703,956 0.1614 0.14141 0.00251 0.0000 0.10921 291 D53154A 8 790 374,084 O.Z15Z D.OD36 0.0000 0.0000 0.10831 297 D53D963 10 411 1,362,840 0.2144 0.0036 0.OD00 O.00DO 03079 Z93 Note: Pip es with Identfc I Consequence of Failure Scores were prioritrzpdaccordfng to their flooding Intemitles 6, 7o,531084 MR1 Diameter (in] Length (ft) Flooding kttensity [gal} impact Cateogty Consequence of Failurz Impact5_ore Health & Safe Transportation Business System operations 10 484 469,044 0.1597 0,0036 0.0000 O.0000 0.0806 364 10 377 472,284 0.1589 0.0036 0.00001 0.0000 0.0802 16S 0531016 8 201 .997,294 0.1276 0.0902 0.0000. 0.0000 0.0799 366 D532061 6 47 812,669 0,0978 0.1414' _ 0.0254 D.D000 0.0798 367 D531085 10 2,451 415,193 0.1566 0.0036 _ 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.0790 368 D531149 10 1,148 435,405 0.1561 0.0036 O.DDDD _ 0.0000 0-0788 369 D531071 10 731 474,836 0.1556 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0785 370 D530977 6 200 854,508 0,1539 0,00361 0.0000 0.0000 0.0776 371 D532136 8 252 926,426 0.1232 0,0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0776 372 0532054 6 348 580,493 O.OSS6 ; 0.1414 _ 0.2132 0.0000 0.0774 373 0532156 6 311 1,1155,400 0.1226 0.08021 O.C)Oal)l 0.0000 0.0773 374 D536145 _8 4331 41.4,312 0.1531 D.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,0773 375 D532057 6 126 733,950 0.0741 0,1414 0.1193 0.0000 0.0773 376 0531162 10 261 1,298,772 0.1531 _ 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0773 377 D532033 10 218 960,768 0.1485 0.0036 0.0165 _ 0.0000 0.0766 378 D531091 10 222 465,710 0.1501 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0758 379 D530873 8 44 926,545 0,1192 0.0802 0.00DO 0.0000 0,0756 380 053366S 8 372 415,608 0.1490 0.0036 00000 O-OQDD 0.0752 381 ❑5427S2 6 165 752,261 0,0923 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0745 382 D531567 8 523 386,261 0.1471 0.0036 0.0000 O.ODOD 0.0743 383 D531064 10 326 468,113 0,1470 0.0036 _ _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0742 384 D531043 10 117 1,061,280 0.1459 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0737 385 D531699 8 153 549,810 0.0710 0.1414 0.0986 0.0000 0.0736 386 D531063 10 S55 493,425 0.1457 0-0036 0.0000 0.0000 _ 0.0736 387 D531601 12 56 100,181 0.0177 03225 0.00001 0.0000 0073.3 389 0600342 10 .1,9971 101,220 0.0174 0.3225 0.00GOI 0.0000 0,0732 389 0600347 8 1831 101,042 0,0163 IL3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0729 390 D530937 8 19 646,170 0.0700 0.1414 O.D939: 0.0000 0.0727 391 D531316 _8 264 500,212 0.1120 0.0202 0.0000 0.0000 0,0720 392 D532201 10, 21 462,524 0.1423 O.OD36' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0719 393 D530932 6 12 636,370' 010682 0.2414 0.0939 0.0000 D.0718 394 D532143 10 24 1,040,100 0.1419 _ _ MOM _ _ _ _ _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0717 395 OS31072 8 270 412,080 0.1416 0.0036 O.D000 _ 0.0000 0.0715 3% D532067 5 1051 765,744 0.0862 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0714 397 D533117 6 8201 336,728 0.0470 11414 0.1939 0.0000 0.0712 398 0530963 8 231 887,661 0.1103 0.0802 0,0000 0.0000 0.0712 399 0542750 10 193 469,679 0.1407 0_.0036 0.0000 O,ODDO 0.0711 400 0532142 10 6 1,038,960 0.1404 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,07091 401 0531065 10 153 456,840 0.1391 0,0036 0-0000 0.0000 0.0703 402 OS31306 10 177 531,510 --0.1073 o.08021 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0697 403 D530975 8 328 687,629 01377 OzO361 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.0696 404 D531645 6 60SI 79,500 0.1375 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0695 405 0531073 8 37S 415,056 0.1374 0.0035 0.0000 00000 0.0694 406 D531024 10 274 1,006,908 0.1371 0.0036 0.0000 0.OD00 0.0693 407 D531630 B 232 _52,135 0.0086 0.3225 _ 0.0000 0.0000 D.0688 408 OS31585 8 _ 1,659 67,574 O.D082 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0686 409 D531092 10 110 400,309 0.1357 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,0696 410 D531111 8 28 672,665 0,0806 0,1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0686 411 0531647 8 528 85,238 0.1356 _ O.D036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0685 412 D531982 6 197 617,868 0.0804 0.1414, 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.0685 413 D532251 8 9 109,158 0.0079 0.3225 O.000O 0.0000 0.D684 414 D531547 8 983 287,291 0.1351 0.0036 _ 0.0000 O.OD00 0.0683 415 D531059 10 1,238 355,775 01344 0.0036 0.0000 0.13000 0.0679 416 D531304 8 18 516,212 0-1031 0-0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 417 D530980 6 272 656,736 0.1336 0,0036 0,0000 O.D000 0,0675 418 0531323 6 971 292,706 0.1027 0.0802 0.0000_ 0.0000 0.0674 419 D530962 8 1341 816,943 _ 0.1027 0-0802 0.0000 00000 00674 420 OS31599 2 92 34.671 0.00S6 0.3225 0.0000 OA000 0.0673 421 D532039 6 165 455,184 0,0527 0.0036 0.40091 0.0000 0.0872 422 0532013 8 203 581,033 0.0775 0,1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0670 423 D531167 10 377 1,012,428 0.1325 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0670 4l4 0531276 8 372 840,032 0.1324 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0669 425 DS30964 8 224 78a,880 0.1318 0.0036 0.0000 0,0000 0.0666 426 D531337 8 706l 376,457 0-1316 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0665 427 0511693 6 1551 417,915 0.0513 U03151 0.4009 0.0000 D.0665 428 0531334 8 391 388,714 0.1308 D.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,0661 429 D530933 8 694 550,834 0.0564 0,1414 0.0939 0.0000 0.0659 430 DS31305 8 37 499,454 0,0984 0.0802 _ 0.0000 0.0652 431 0532364 6 32 563,Z10 0.0981 0.0802 0.0000 _0-0000 0.0000 0.0651 432 0531336 8 491 336,600 0-1287 MOM 0.0000 O.ODOO 0.0651 433 0S3159D 2 131 13,233 D.0010 0.3225 0.0000 00000 0.0650 434 D531592 2 105 13,129 0.0010 0.3225 D.D000 0,0000 0.0650 435 D531320 5 401 488,1Z4 0.0976 O.OBQ2 0.6000 D.0000 0,0649 436 - ..Ir...........�.,....e..r C��h�.e Cmmc wwra nrinrlTbnd a[mrdin•10 their FlnMln•int2fl51r1.5 Pipe ID Di7,10 Length (ft) Flooding Intensity (gal) Impact Cateogry cons UmiDi, of Failure Impact score , Health8 safe Transportation Business System O rations D531033 484 469,044 01597 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0806 364 D531D84 10 377 472,284 0-1589 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0$02 365 D531016 8 20 987,294 0.1276 0.0802 0.0000 D.0000 D.D79B 366 0532061 61 47 912,669 0,0978 0.1414 0,0254 0.0000 OD798 367 D531085 10 2,451 4]5.193 0.1566 0.0036 D.D000 0.0000 0,0790 368 D531148 10i 1,148 435,4051 0.1561 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0798 369 D531071 101 231 474,836 01556 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0785 370 D530977 6 200 354,508 0.1539 0.0036 0.00001 0,0000 0.0776 371 D532136 8 252 926,426 0.1232 0.0802 0,0000 0-0000 0.0776 372 0532054 6 349 580,493 0.0556 0.1414 0.2132 0,0000 0.0774 373 D532156 6 31 1,055,400 0.1226 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0,0778 374 D536145 8 433 414,312 0.1531 0.0036 0.0000 010000 0•07-73 375 D532057 5 126 733,9SO 0.0741 0.1414 01193 0.0000 0.0773 376 D-931162 10 261 17298,772 0.1531 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,0773 377 D532033 10 212 960,7681 0.1485 0.0036 0.0166 0.0000 0.0766 378 D531091 10 222 465,710 0.1501 0.0035 0.0000 0.0000 0.0758 379 0530873 8 44 926,545 0.1192 0.0902 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.0756 390 0533665 8 372 415,608 0.1490 0.0036 0.0900 0.0000 0.0752 381 D542752 6 185 752,261 0.0923 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0,0745 382 D531567 8 523 386,261 0.1471 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0743 383 0531064 10 326 468,113 0.1470 0.0036 0.0000 _ 0,0000 0-0_742 384 D531043 10 117 1,061,280 0.1459 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0737 385 D531699 8 153 549,8101 0.0710 0.1414 0.0996 0.0000 0.0736 386 D531063 10 555 493,4251 0.1457 _ 0.0036 0.00001 0.0000 O.D736 387 D531601 12 56 100,181. 0.0177 0.3225 0.0000 00000 0.0733 388 D600342 10 1,997 101,220 0.0174 0.3225 0-0000 0.0000 0.0732 389 D600347 81 183 101,042 MOM 0,3225 0.00D0 0.0000 0.0729 390 D530937 8 19 646,170 0.0700 0.1414 0.0939 O.D000 0.0727 391 0531316 8 264 60%212 0.1120 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0720 392 D532201 10 21 462,524 0.1423 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0719 _ 393 D530932 6 12 636,370 D.0682 0.1414 0.0919 0.0000 0.0718 394 D532143 10 24 1,040,100 0.1419 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0717 395 D531072 8 270 412,080 0..1416 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0715 396 D532067 61 105 765,744 0.0862 0.1414 0,0000 0.0000 0.0714 397 D533117 6 820 336,728 0.0470 0,1414 0,1939 0.0000 0:0712 398 D530963 81 231 887,661 0.1103 0,0802 _ O.000D 0.0000 0.0712 399 D542750 30 193 469,679 0.2407 0.0036 0•0000 0.0000 0.0711 400 D532142 10 6 1,038,960 0.1404 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 00709 401 D531065 10 153 456,840 0.1391 _ 0.0036 0,00001 0.0000 0.0703 402 D531306 10 177 5311510 0.1073 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0-0697 403 D530975 8 328 687,629 0.1377 0.0036 0.0000 00000 0,0696 404 D531645 6 605 79,500 0.1375 0.0036 0,0000 O.D000 0.0695 405 0S31073 375 415,056 0.1374 0.0036 _0.0000 0.0000 0.0694 406 D531024 _8 101 274 1,006,909 0.1371 0.0036 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.0693 407 OS31600 8 232 57,1351 0.0086 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 _ 0.0688 408 D531585 8 1,659 67,574 0.0082 U2251 0.0000 0.0000 0.0685 409 D531092 10 110 400,308 0.1357 0.0036 O.D000 0.0000 0.0686 410 D531111 8 23 672,665 0.08D6 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0686 411 ❑531647 g 528 85,238 0.1356 0.0036 0.0000 0,0000 0.0695 412 D53L%2 fi 297 617,868 0.0804 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0,0685 413 0532251 8 9 109.158 0.0079 0.3225 010000 0.0000 0.0684 414 0531547 8 983 287,291 0.1351 00036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0683 415 D531.059 10 1,238 365,775 0.1344 0,0036 D.ODDD DMOD 0.0679 _ 416 D531304 8 18 516,212 0.1031 0.0802 0,000D 0A000 0-D676 417 0530980 6 272 656,736 0.1336 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 419 D531323 6 971 292,706 0.1027 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0674 419 0530962 at 134 816,1343 0.1027 0.0202 0.0000 0-0000 0-0674 420 531589 21 92 34,6711 0.0O56 03225 0.0000 0.0000 00673 421 0532038 fi 165 455,1941 0.0517 0.0036 0.40091 0.OD00 0.0572 422 0532013 91 203 581,0331 0.0775 0.1414 11.00DO 0.00D0 0.0670 423 D531167 101 37 1,012,428 0.1325 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0670 424 D531276 8 372 840,0321 0.1324 0.0036 0.0000 D.0000 0.0669 425 0.530964 8 224 788,880 0-2318 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.0666 426 0531331 8 706 376,457 0.1316 OD036 _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0665 427 D531693 6 155 417,915 0 0513 O.OD36 04009 0.0000 0.0665 428 D531334 8 391 388,714 0-1308 0.0036 ❑.0000 0.0000 0.0661 429 0530933 8 694 550.834 0.0564 0.1414 0.0391 0.0000 0.0659 430 D531305 8 37 499,454 0-0984 0.0602 0.00001 0.0000 0.0652 431 D532164 6 32 563,210 0.0981. 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0651 432 8 491 336,1011 0.1287 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0651 433 02131 13,233 0.0010 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0650 434 r5,3,36 22 105 13,129 0.0010 03225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0650 435 0 6 401 488,114 0.0976 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 O.D649 436 Mnte. Pives with idendcal Con-uence of fallure n..,.-.. :........:.: PipelD Diameter (in} length (ft) Flooding Intensity (gal} Impact Cateom Consequence of Failure Impact Score Health& safe Transportation Business Systerp Operations 0531083 1O 48 459,044 0.1597 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.0806 364 D531084 10 377 472,264 0.1589 0.0D36 6.0000 0.0000 0.0802 865 D531016 8 20 987,Z94 .1 761 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0798 366 1)53206. 6 47 812,669 0.097B D.1414 0.0254 D_0000 0.0798 367 D531085 10 2,451 415,193 0.1 666 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0790 36S D531148 101 1,148 435,405 0.1561 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0788 369 0531071 101 2311 474,83E 0.1556 0.003E 0.0000 0.00001 0.0785 370 D530977 6 200 854,508 0-1339 0.0036 0.0000 10,00DO 0.0776 371 D532136 8 252 926,426 0.1232 0.0802 0.00001 0.0000 0.0776 372 D532054 6 34B 580,493 0.055E 0.1414 0.21321 0.0000 0.0774 373 053215E 6 3 1,055,400 D.1226 0.580? 0.0000 0.000D 00773 374 D536145 8 433 414,312 0.1531 0.0036 0.00DO 0.0000 0.0773 375 0532057 6 126 733,950 0.0741 0.1414 0 1193 0.0000 0.0773 376 0531162 10 261 1.,298,772 0.1531 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0773 377 D532033 10 218 960,768 0.1485 0.0036 0.0166 0.0000 0.0766 378 D531091 lD 222 465,7101 0.1501 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0758 379 D530973 8 44 926,545 I1192 0.0802 0.D000 0.0000 D.0756 380 D533565 8 372 415,608 0.1490 0.0036 0,0000 5000 0.0752 381 D542752 6 185 752,261 0.0923 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0745 382 D531567 81 523 396,261 0.1471 0.0036 0.0000 00000 0.0743 383 D531D64 10 326 458,133 0.1470 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0742 384 D531043 10 117 1,061,280 0.1459 0.0036 0.0000 (1.0000 0.0737 385 0531699 8 153 549,810 0.0710 0,1414 0.0986 00000 0.0736 386 D531063 10 555 493,425 0.1457 0,0036 0.00001 O.D000 0.0736 387 D531601 12 56 100,181 0.0177 0.3223 amool 0.0000 0.0713 388 D600342 10 1,997 101,220 0.0174 0.3225 0.0000 0.01)00 0.0732 389 DE00347 8 183 SO1,042 0.0168 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0729 390 0530937 81 19 646,170 0.0700 0.1414 0,0939 0.0000 0.0727 391 D531316 4 2641 600,212 0,1120 0,0802 0A000 O.D000 a072C 392 D532201 101 21 462,524 _ 0.1423 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0719 393 D530932 6 12 636,370 0.0682 0.1414 0.0539 0,000p 0.0718 394 D532143 10 2 1,040,100 6.2419 0.0036 0.0000 00000 0.0717 395 D531072 B 27 412,030 D.1416 0.0036 D.0000 0.0000 0.0715 396 D532067 6 105 765,744 0.0862 0.1414 0.000D 0.0000 0.0714 397 D533117 6 820 336,728 0.047D D.1414 0.1939 0.0000 0.0712 398 D530963 8 231 887,661 0.1103 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0712 399 0542750 10 1931 469,679 0.1407 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0711 400 0532142 10 6 1,035,960 0.1404 0,0035 0.0000 MOD() 0.0709 401 D531065 10 153 456,840 0.1391 3.13036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0703 402 D531306 10 177 531,510 0.1073 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0697 403 D530975 8 328 687,629 0.1377 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0696 A04 0531645 6 605 79,500 0.1375 O.OD36 0.0000 0.0000 0.0695 405 D531073 S 375 415,056 0:13 44 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0,0694 406 D531024R6. 274 1,006,908 0.1371 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0693 407 D531600 23Z 52,135 0.0086 0.3225 O.D000 0.0000 0 MR 408 D531585 1,659 67,574 0-0082 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0666 409 D531092 11 400,108 0.1357 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,0686 410 D531111 28 672,665 0.0806 0,1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0686 411 D531647 528 85,238 0.1356 0.0036 O.000O 0.0000 0,0695 412 D531982 197 617,868 0.0804 0.1414 U.D000 0.0000 0.0685 413 D532251 9 109,15E 0.D079 0.3225 0.0000 0.0000 0.0684 414 D531547 983 287,293 0.1351 0.003E 0.0000 O.00DO 0.0663 415 D531.059 1,232 365,775 0.1344 0.0036 0.000D 010000 0.0679 416 D591904 18 516,212 0,1031 0.0802 0.0000 O.000D 0,0676 417 D530980 272 656,736 0.1336 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 418 0531323 971 292,706 - 0.1027 0,0802 0.0000 010000 0.0674 419 D530962 8 13 916,943 0,1027 0.0802 0.0001) 0.0000 0.0674 AN D531589 2 92 34,671 0.005E 0.3225 0.00001 0.0000 0.0673 421 D532039 6 165 455,184 0,0527 0:0036 0.4009 _ 0.0000 0,0672 422 D532013 8 203 581,033 0.0775 0.1414 0.0000 0.000D 0.0570 423 D531167 10 377 1,012,428 0.1325 0.0036 010000 0.0000 0.0670 424 D531276 8 372 840,032 0.1324 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0669 425 D530964 8 224 788,880 0.1318 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0666 426 D531337 8 706 376,457 0.131E 0.0036 ().00001 0.0000 0.0665 427 D531693 6 155 417,915 0.0513 0.0036 0,40091 0.00DO 0.0665 428 D531334 8 391 388,714 0.1308 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0661 429 D530933 8 694 550,834 0.0564 0.1414 0.0939 0.0000 0.0659 430 D531305 8 37 499,454 0.0984 0,0802 0.0000 0.0000 0,0652 431 0532164 6 32 563,210 0.0981 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0651 432 D531336 8 491 336,600 0.1287 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0651 433 D531590 2 131 23,233 O.00IO 0.3225 0.0000 D_0000: 0.0650 434 D531592 21 1051 13,129 0,0020 0-3225 D.D000 0.0000 0.0650 435 D531320 4011 488,124 0.0971ij 0.0802 000001 0. DODO 0.06491 436 - W11-i- ,.e 9. ffi- -.-.,.,.-nri-111-da n.dine In their fin dim intr'Asftk�A Pipe I Pipe In information tgametes (14) floo�n� 'e-nz% T ITftwxy (M (PT) Consequence of Failure Evaluation Results Impact Catec�ry Consequence 01F i fmpactScore FINAL si"hh % Safety pwTranststlon Business system I operatIOM D531914 8 65 389,980 0,0718 0.0802 O.OQ00. D.00001 0M19 510 D536143 9 790 405,059 0.0471 0.1414 0.0000 0.00001 0.0519 511 - D532169 8 257 501,857 0.1022 0.0035 0,0000 0,0000 0.0518 512 1)532025 8 12 657,552 0U021 0-0036 RODOO 0.0000 0,0518 513 D531392 8 39 529,423 0-0712 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0-0516 514 D531654 8 509 87,355 0.1014 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.0514 515 D5313D3 9 305 353,462 0.0708 0-0802 0!00001 0.0000 00514. 526 D532163 538 846,651 0,1911 0-0036 0.0000 O.ODOD 0.0513 517 D531553 H 285 255,1318 0-2009 0.00�36 00000 0.0000 0.0512 518 D531930 8 101 615,429 0.0695 00802 0.0000FO.00DO 0.0508 519 D532026 8 20 632,289 0.0996 0.0036 0.0027 0.0000 (),0508 520 115313-91 a 119 603,697 0-0595 0.0802 0.0000 , 0: OW 0.00M 0.0508 521 D531966 8 407 662,008 0.0991 0.0035 00000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0503 522 D531947 9 392 502.0a4 0,0985 O.DO36 01MOO 0.0001� 0.0500 573 D5308133 8 375 -55S,.128 0.0984 0,0036 0.0000 0.00001 0.0499 524 D532280 8 16 385,455 0.0677, 0.0802 010000 0.0000 CI.D499 525 D532035 61 172 441,252 0.0587 O,G036 0.1959 0.00DO 0,0496 526 D53196-2- a 56 663,642 0.0975 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 527 T602850 8 2 941,525 00989 0.0000 0.0000 OMOO 0.0495 528 D531023 8 195 782,988 0.0374 0.0036 0.0()00, 0.0000 0.0494 5291 D533666 8 714 378,276 0,0974 0.00116 0.00001 O.D000 0.0494 530 D531333 a 479 475_720 0.0972 0,0036 0-0000 0.0000 0,0493 5311 0532193 6 6 343,317 0.0357 0.0036 0.3070 0.0000 0.0493 512 D531262 6, 48 573,203 0.0665 010802, 0.0000 o.oam 0.0493 533 D530924 6 654 371,735 0.D413 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0-0489 534 D542707 10 339 343,335 O0964 0.0036 010000. &Oaao: 0-0489 535 D533676 8 203 417,396 O.D962 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0488 536 0531526 a 65 90,636 0.0409 0,1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0467 537 D532875 9- 24 E12,476 0.0653 0.0802 0.0000 0,0000 0-0487 538. D531923 12 146 -759,423 0.0972 0.0000 0.00110 0.0000 0.6486 539 T502856 8, 20 922,194 0.0971 0.0000 0.0000 D-D000 0.0485 540 D531968 al 105 502,703 0.0747 a0036 0.1033 0.0000 D,0484 541 D532888 61 376 433,237 0.0646 0.11802 0,0000 0.0000 0-0483 542 D531664- 6 314 74,993 0.0944 0.0036 O.OD00l 0.0000 0.0479 543 D5308-97 B 35j 736,649 00940, 0.0036 0.0006 0.0000 0.0477 544 D532129 61 20 870,240 0.0942 (0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0471 545 D530896 81 156 712,567 0.0925 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 00470 546 D531842 81 36 732,229 0.092-5 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.0470 547 D531004 81 566 640,229 0,0618 0.0802 010000 0.0000 0.0469 -670467 S46 D532827 6 33 479,324 0.0613 010802 0.0000 O.00D0 549 1)53.1583- 8 1,18.3 177,068 0.0610 0.0802 0.0000, 0.0000 0,0465 550 D532885 6 175 511,659 0.0608 0.0802 0 OOGOJ 0.0000 0. - 0464 -- 551 D533667 8 595 374,160 0.0911 0.0036 0.00DO1 0.0000 60463 5521 D531591 12 10 466,830 0.0356 0.1414 ().00001 0.0000 0.0461 553 D542711 8 1,215 374,475 0.0904 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0459 554 D531700 6 305 471,045 0,0501 0.0036 02010 0. OQOQ . _0,0459 555 D531957 81 420 576,954, 0,0902 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0,0458 556 D531010 91 1,265 304,6201 0.0312 0.0802 0.1408 0,0000 0.0457 557 D532032 fil 859 537,0841 0.0866 0.0036 0.0165 0.0000 O.D457 558 D534824 a 91 520,9131 0.0696 0.0036 0.1006 0.0000 0.0456 559, D531977 81 353 5912,4161 0,0896 0,0036 0,0000, 00000 0.0455 SrDI D531843 8 17 722,8411 0.0895 0.0036 0.00001 O.DODO 0.0455 5611 D531347 8 464 583,6311 0.0895 0.0036 00000 0.0000 0'()455 562 D53.2008 6 227 282,4651 0.0342 0-1414 0-0000 0.0000 - 0.0454 S63 D531696 a 359 515,4151 0.0684 0.0036 0.1031 0.0000 0.0452 564 C531819 8 2D1 678,4261 0,0890 0.0036 0.0000 OMOO 0,0452 565 D531653 a 1.66 84,575 0-0886 0.0036 0-0000 0-0000 - 0.0450 566 D531665 61 137 84,898 0.0885 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 - O.0450 567 0533671 81 321 375,792 0.0885 0.0036 0.0000, 0.0000 0.0450 568 D532711 81 298 422,700 0.0884 010036 0.0000 0.0449 569 D531234 a 672 420,743 0.0576 0.002 0.0000 ----0,0000 0.0005 0.0448 570 MMM a 363 668,914 0-0879 0.0036 0-0000 lwooa 0.0447 571 0547704 10 501 340,920, 0.0879 00036 0.0560 00005 D.0446 572 D531849 8 18 827,474 0.0876 0.0036 (10000 0.0000 0.0445 573 D532871 6 30 442,536 0.0570 0.08D2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0445 574 0511058 6 8 463,B24 0.1122 00000 0,0000 0.0000 0.044S 575 0535869 6 118 75,098 0.08,,j 0.0036 010000 0.0000 0.0445 576 D530882 8--71-3-6 711,212- 0.08741 010026 D.0000 -0,0000 0.0444 577 D542705 10 1,321 335,145 0.0873 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0444 578 D530971 8 2 571,440 0.0872 0.0035 OMOO 0,0000 0.0443 579 D531844 8 35.4 736,197 0.0869 0.0036 0-0000 0.0000 0,0442 580 D536147 8 1717 37 9! 401 0,0562 0. 0.0000 0-OODO 0.0442 581 ,0530959 8, 'S - 455.L119 0.0562 0 0902i 0.00001 O.Owo. 0.0442, 582 Nuk: Pipes whh Idential Consequence of Failure Scores were oriorittred a-rdine to rheir floodine>..r.....a:e� WIN Diameter Length 797 System oIFailure Pie ID (in) (ft)Transportation eusfnessO eralions Impact Score D531104 8 435 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0643 437 0531074412 61 0.0036 0.0000 0 0000 0.0642 438 D530931652 441,201 0.0526 0.1414 0.0939 0,0000 0.0640 439 D536149 1,032,4Q2 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.063 440 05316499 86,985 0.1260 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.063 441 D53131083 479,892 O-W4 00802 00006 O.00OD D.0632 442 D53219922 408,864 Q,1244 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0629 443 0531661 81 M1 88,587 0.1240 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0.0627 444 D530982 0 4901 558,88E 0.1239 OJID36 0.0000 0.0000 00627 445 D543110 12 867,395 0.1233 0.003E 0.0000 0,00001 0,0623 446 0533109 6 9 610,879 0.0736 0.0902 0.0946 0.0000 0.0623 447 D531009 aj 169 713,78E 0.0923 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0,0622 448 D531155 10 501 934,659 0.1225 0.003E 0.0000 0,0000 0.0620 449 DS31335 8 167 386,20E 0.1.221 0.0036 010000 0.01100 0.0618 450 D532975 8 84 773,917 0.1234 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0617 451 D531606 8 34 512,828 0.06401 0.003E 0.2984 0.0000 0.061E 452 D531651 8 5 75,96E 0.1214 0.0036 D.0000 0.0000 0.0614 453 D532072 8 14 585,897 0.0661 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0613 454 0532068 8 47 579,338 0.065E 0,1414 O.ODOD 0.0000 0.0611. 455 D531947 10 191 889,50E 0.1203 0.0036 0.0000 010000 0.0609 456 D532116 E 223 782107 01200 O.OD36 010000 0.0000 0.0607 457 D542760 12 131 940,77E 0.1190 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0602 458 D542757 11 4 913,068 0,118E D_0036 0.(i00Q 0.0000 0.0600 454 D531082 5 231 299,556 01185 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0500 460 0542754 12 24 932220 O.3182 O.D036 0.0000 0.000E -QOSqB 461 D542756 321 24 911,040 0.1180 O.DODO 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.059 462 D542758 12 644 917,998 O,11fi5 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0590 463 D53184E S. 749 626,262 0.0848 0.0802 0.000DI 0.0000 0.0585 464 D531314 61 730, 373,842 0.084E 0.0802 MOM O.000D 0.0583 465 D531025 8 -86 862,124 0.1149 0.003E 0.0000 0.00DO 0.0582 466 D531109 61 991 496,562 0.D597 0.1414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0581 467 0532D27 fl 663,831 0.1146 0.0036 0,0000 0.0000 0 0580 468 D531084 10 758 418,811 0.1145 0-0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0580 461 0531663 8 2031 77,070 0.1145 00036 0.0000 moaoa 0.0580 470 053202E 8 231 651,431 0.1140 0.0036 0.000 n.D000 0.0577 471 D531M 8 16 999,798 D.1130 O.0036 0.0000 D.00DO 0.0572 472 D531188 8 3611 636,557 0.0116 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 O.D569 473 D531060 12 5891 395,004 0.1218 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0,056E 474 D531184 6 11 486,312 0.0807 0.0802 0.0000 O.Q664 475 D531562 8 151 77,108 0.1113 0.0036 0.0000 0,0564 476 D531576 8 428 574,114 0.0905 0,0802 0.0000 0.0553 477 ❑531181 fi 679 467,208 0.08D5 0.0802 Q.0000 0.0563 478 0532064 6 659 449,831 0.0508 0,1414 0.0254 CO.O'DOOD.0555 0.0552 479 D531619 8 495 344,285 0.030E O.OSQ2 0-2478 0.0561 480 T602848 10 1,162,044 0,1106 0.0036 0.0000 .0560 481 T603302 8 102 1,042,128 0.1117 0.0000 0.0000 .0559 482 0531543 6 673 79,500 0.1095 0.0036 0.0000 D.0555 483 D532198 8 3131 430,920 0.0292 0.0802 0.2478 D,0000 0.0554 484 D531038 8 2.161 846,626 0.1092 0.0035 0.0000 0.0000 0,0553 485 D532021 8 2211 603,309 D,S08fi 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 00550 486 D531592 8 9211 169,1)95 0.0775 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.054E 487 D5311885 8 113 956,947 0.1080 0.003E 0.0000 0.0000 0,0547 488 D531380 6 6581 310,644 0.1080 O,DO36 O,000Q 0.0000 0,0541 489 T600006 10 71 921,480 0.1695 0.000D O.ODOO 0.0000 0.0547 490 D531289 fi- 151 296,730 0.1070 0.OD36 0.0000 0,000D 0.0542 4 91 ❑534823 8 74 543,053 0.0860 0.003E 0.1031 0.0000 00540 492 D530934 6 278,401 0.0319 a1414 0,0439 0.0000 0,0536 493 D532829 6 8591 519,396 0.1024 0,0036 0,0166 0.0000 0.0536 494 D531910 8 4531 376,403 0.0748 Q0802 0.0000 0,0000 0,0534 495 D535813 6 8 421 5491 85,493 69,752 O 051 0.0497 0.0036 0.1414 0.0000 010000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0533 0.0591 496 497 D5315138 D531850 12 393 928,464 0.104E Q.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0530 498 D531649 6 85 82,710 0.1046 0,003E 0.0000 0.0000 Q.0530 499 D531845 8 121 850,941 0.1045 0.00361 O.00OO 0.0000 O.D530 500 D531869 8 75 501,885 0.064E 0.0036 9.1971 0.0000 0 0529 501 D542709 10 301 352,755 0.1041 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.052E 502 D530950 6 256 402,259 0.0545 0.0802 0,0946 0.0000 0.0527 503 0530894 B. REJ 662,359 0.1034 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0524 504 D531963 E 173 665,865 0.1034 D,OQ3E 0.0000 0.000D 0,0524 SOS D531915 8 30 382,080 0.0726 0.0802 0.0000 0.0000 0.0524 506 D531M 8 20 392,133 0,0230 0,0802 R2478 0.0000 0.0523 507 D532023 a 192 636,437 0.102E O.DO36 0.00D0 0.0000 00520 SOB D531232 8 391,417 0.0473 0.14141 0,0000 n_nnnn nnrlo cna .a..s-..-..,.-o6-If,.,I f� rhnirfiu di- int-f- pipe Pi ID lnformat;on Diameter (Ini Length {it) Flooding intensity (gal) Consequence of Failure Evaluation Results Impact [ateom Gorse auence ofFaNure I.tfpaCtScare Mealtha Safe Transportation Business S�rstem O rations D532115 6 395 135,885 0.0127 0.0036 D.OnoO 0.0000 0.0071 1021 D531034 6 4 110,044 0.0125 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0070 1022 D53T053 6 439 85;774 0.0124 0.0035 0.0000 0.0000 0.0059 1023 D544652 6 5 111,435 0.0123 0.0036 0.0000 D.00DO 0,0069 1024 0530987 4 40 73,509 0.0123 0.0036 O.D000 0.0000 0.0069 1025 D531964 4 184 122,626 0.0123 0.0036 00000 0.0000 0.0069 1026 D531206 6 257 130,494 0.0121 0.OD36 0.0000 0,0000 0.0068 1027 0531373 4 305 112,889 0,0117 0.0036 j 0.0000 0-0000 0,0066 1028 0531852 4 295 104,948 0.0117 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0066 1029 D603112 8 8 100,695 0.0116 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0065 1030 D603109 B. 30 100,664 0.013.6 00036 O OOOO 0.0000 0.0065 1031 D603115 81 651 100,527 0.0116 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0065 1032 D539619 6 - 4621 122,232 0.0112 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0-0063 1033 D531037 4 1011 108.540 0.0121 O.ODOO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0060 1034 D531248 4 1601 102,356 0.0106 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0060 1035 0531288 6 7661 113,568 0.0106 0.00361 ().000ol 0.0000 D.0060 1036 D531135 3 2101 105,613 0.0103 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0059 1037 DS33075 41071 92,174 _ 0.0103 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0059 1038 D532017 4 513 94,620 0-0100 0,0036 0.0000 D.0000 0.0057 i039 D531224 4 2271 88,118 0.0099 0.0036 _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0057 1040 D530877 4 821 94,452 0-0095 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0-0055 1041 D531137 4 239 99,294 0.0095 00036 0.0000 0.00DO 0.0055 1042 D531196 6 449 107-399; 0.D094 0.0036 0-0000 0.0000 D.0054 1043 D532114 4 120 96,743 0.0093 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0-0054 1044 D531965 4 244 84,015 0.0091 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 MOSS 1045 D532019 4 501 85,468 0.0091 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0053 1046 D530878 4 155 81,751 0.0104 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0052 1047 D531035 41 70 78,998 0.0088 0.0036 D.0000 0.0D00 0.0051 1048 D531372 41 5261 81,915' 0.0087 0,0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0051 1049 D531327 4 234 79,970 O.OD86 0.0036 0.0000 0-0000 0,0050 1050 D531197 6 379 97,818 D.0085 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0050 1051 D532109 4 207 86,607 0-0081 0-0036 0.0000 O.ODOD 0,0048 1052 D531040 4 113 68,757 0.0077 0:0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0046 1053 D531309 4 30 82,391 0.0077 0.0035 0.0000 0.0000 00045 1054 D531036 4 80 77,963 0.0087 D.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0-0043 1055 D531041 41 144 64,552 0.0059 0.0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0042 1055 0531924 4 7671 87,528 0.0061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0040 1057 D531801 2 48 55,6371 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0026 1058 D531308 2 128 13,188 0.0019 0�0036 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016 1059 D531570 2 499 11,400 0-0012 0.0036 0.00DO OO O.OD 0.0013 1060 D531379 2 397 11,110 0.()0101 0.0036 0.00001 0.0000 0.0012 1061 EXHIBIT D Capital Improvement Plan $894,900 $2,600 $2,600 $21,400 $700 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $7,800 $1,400 $2,100 $1,000 $42,000 $36,200 $381,600 $1,696,700 $17,000 $3,400 $28,300 $555,300 $8,200 $33,900 $11,000 $6,300 $28,300 $14,700 $1,196,500' $888,300 51,313,400 $4,700 $2,800 $5,100 $1,400 $3,400 $1,700 $2,700 $47,000 $18,800 $37,400 $1,000 $59,600 $3,189,900 $19,300 $3,400 $12,100 $62,200 $39,600 $31,200 $93,800 $118,700 $28,300 $471,200 $415,000 $371,000 $15,400 $2,500 $48,000 $2,200 $5,700 $600 $76,300 $2,300 $2,700 $22,400 $483, 600 $476,000 $3,100 $30,900 $47,600 $8,500 $3,400 $1,600 $465,400 $695,700 $2,500 $600 $1,756,500 $1,012,700 $416,400 $2,007,200 $176,400 $1,849,700 $1,398,600 $5,165,500 $2,142,800 $1,442,700 3 $1,091,400 $2,571,100 $866,200 $780,800 $1,452,300 $2,242,1004F $452,700 $1,740,400 $6,300 $2,400 $5,800 $100 $41,200 $3,400 $2,700 $21,000 $3,700 $85,800 $700 $1,000 $1,000 $25,200 $110,900 $20,700 $44,600 $40,200 $75,500 $9,700 $72,900 $61,400 $570,100 $223,000 $248,900 $84,100 $255,700 $189,600 $35,200 $19,400 $42,400 $52,200 $31,800 $181,600 $11,300 $36,900 $183,600 $28,300 $28,900 $28,300 $3,400 $28,300 $17,000 $28,300 $860,200 $1,461,700 $469,900 $316,900 $787,200 $1,167,200 $408,900 $744,500 $2,500 $3,400 $2,500 $2,500 $8,200 $65,000 $600 $4,000 $600 $600 $11,900 $93,200 $882,700 Ir$755,OM $25,300 $2,400 $1,000 $1,400 $14,800 $29,800 $3,100 $12,600 $58,700 $932,300 $11,300 $3,400 $27,700 $457,700 $842,100 $2,500 $20,200 $600 $3,600 $2,092,400 $4,794,600 $1,665,800 $1,429,100 $2,668,400 $3,752,500 $1,136,000 $3,034,200 $2,336,000 $1,820,000 EXHIBIT E Maintenance Plan Water System Maintenance Plan The recommended items, frequencies, and work descriptions below should be considered a minimum level of effort by any proposer. Proposers should submit a five-year maintenance plan, describe the methods for work planning, scheduling, executing, and reporting, and describe the system the proposer will use to manage and report on the maintenance of the Cupertino water system. The proposer should also delineate plans for capital replacement of mains, valves, and other fixed assets. Distribution Systems Daily ✓ Perform housekeeping functions and security check at Mann, Cristo Rey, Mercedes, Flowering Pear, and Franco stations. ✓ Check any warning lights (e.g., low water level, high water level, power outage, pump failure). ✓ Investigate any customer complaints (e.g., water leak, low pressure, water quality problems, taste, odor). ✓ Follow up on leak reports and make necessary repairs. Weekly ✓ Record well pump run times and pump cycle starts. ✓ Check instrumentation,for proper signal input/output. ✓ Record water purchase and well water production. Monthly ✓ Read service meters for billing. Determine trends for water demand, leaks, and conservation. ✓ Check and record chlorine residual in the distribution system. Evaluate and record high and low levels. ✓ Check and record fluoride concentration in the distribution system. ✓ Collect routine bacteriological samples and test for total coliform. Follow up on unsatisfactory sample results and provide a report documenting the results. ✓ Check service pressures throughout distribution systems and investigate the cause of any low pressures. Flush dead ends or low flow sections of the system to maintain water quality. ✓ Conduct distribution system maintenance and keep records of all preventive work, repairs, and equipment modifications or replacements Annually ✓ Evaluate overall performance of the distribution system (e.g., pressure, flow capacity) and identify areas needing repair or update. ✓ Exercise distribution system valves and clean valve pots. Record inspection results and repair broken valves. Locate (i.e., GPS coordinates) unmapped valves and add to the City's GIs system. ✓ Do a water audit and calculate unaccounted-for water by comparing water production and usage — goal of < 4%. ✓ Conduct a preventive maintenance program (e.g., calibration, replacement) on high volume service meters. Replace 5% to 7% of lower flow meters beginning with earliest installations. ✓ Evaluate safety programs and equipment (e.g., traffic safety, trench safety, confined space, ladder safety) and update training documents as needed. ✓ Evaluate Emergency Response Plan (e.g., loss of pressure, contamination, cross connections, overfeeds) and update as needed. ✓ Update/reconcile distribution system data (e.g., year of install, size, type, material, condition) in GIs or other asset management software to reflect the latest capital projects and repairs. ✓ Evaluate the flushing program (e.g., training, equipment, availability of hydrants or blowoffs). ✓ Have backflow prevention assemblies tested by certified backflow assembly tester (BAT). Record results and take corrective maintenance as needed. Ensure backflow inventory is up to date by reconciling with new construction and remodels in the service area. ✓ Determine daily and monthly peak water -demand periods: Document peaks for next five- year master plan update. ✓ Conduct Cross -Connection Control Program activities according to your program plans. ✓ Perform flow tests on 20% of fire hydrants. Pumps and Pumping Facilities Daily ✓ Check motors for unusual pump motor conditions, such as: • Unusual pump noises in operation (hum, chattering, clicking, rapid knocking, etc.) • Motor fails to start or to come up to speed normally. • Blackened or excessive sparking at commutator or brushes. • Fine dust under couplings with rubber butters or pins. • Smoke or charred insulation. • Excessive vibration, heat, unusual odors. ✓ Check any warning lights or alarms for low pressure, pump failure, intrusion, power outage, etc. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check pumps for leaks or seepage for pumps that are not water lubricated. Write work order for follow up corrective action for any leaks found. ✓ Check pump cycle rate — troubleshoot excessive pump cycling (about 6 cycles per hour). ✓ Verify start and stop pressure settings and operability of water pressure gauges - reference O&M manual. Reset if out of parameters. ✓ Check bearing temperatures if a temperature gauge is available. Take care when checking how hot it may be. Write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check pump run hours if information is available. ✓ Clean pump station interior and grounds. Report wear, vandalism, and/or security concerns for follow up corrective action. Monthly ✓ Check oil or grease lubricant reservoirs for proper levels and any leakage or unusual conditions. Write work order for follow up corrective action if unable to correct problem. ✓ Check packing for wear and repack as -necessary. ✓ Check pump and motor alignment to ensure torque transfer to the pump. Adjust as needed. ✓ Check and secure all pump mountings. ✓ Inspect bearings and drive belts for wear. Adjust, repair, or replace as necessary. ✓ Perform routine operation of emergency generator per manufacturer's instructions. ✓ Check condition of emergency generator batteries, fuel levels, oil levels, instruments, and controls. Correct conditions outside of parameters or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check that existing pressure gauges, pump run meters, and flow meters are functioning properly. ✓ Check that pump controls are functioning properly. Write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check pump station lighting, ventilation, security, and animal proofing (bats, birds, rodents). Write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Read electric meter at pump house and record. Annually ✓ Clean electrical panels and MCCs. Inspect connections for burning, pitting, discoloration. Replace worn or damaged components. ✓ Perform pump efficiency tests on well and system pumps. Schedule maintenance or replacement when efficiency fall below establish levels of service. ✓ Performed by a qualified electrician, twice per year or every 400 hours (whichever is less), service the emergency generator and test the automatic transfer switch at Mann Station ✓ Measure source pump capacity in gallons per minute (GPM) to detect pump output problems. ✓ Calibrate pressure gauges and flow meters monitoring pump performance and capacity. Storage Facilities Weekly ✓ Check any warning lights or alarms - low water level, high water level, intrusion, power outage, etc. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check storage tank for signs of security breaches - damaged fences, open gates, graffiti, vandalism, etc. Report security violations. ✓ Check the overflow line, vents, ladder access locks, roof access hatches, and controls that are readily visible from the ground for damage, vandalism, or other conditions. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check storage tank and site after any adverse event (i.e., heavy rain, high wind, earthquake). Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. Monthly ✓ Check water level indicator and record information. ✓ Verify all openings are protected from surface runoff, windblown contaminants, insects, birds and animals. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check tank overflow lines for signs of damage, such as, screens, flapper valves, check valves, splash plate, etc.. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check area for excessive vegetation or dangerous conditions - uncut grass, brush, dead trees, fire hazard, ponding water, etc. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check control valves for proper positions, open or closed. Reposition as needed. ✓ Check control valves for damage or leaks. Correct issues or write work order for follow up corrective action. ✓ Check earth embankments for erosion, burrowing animals, improper drainage, and leakage. Annually ✓ Check storage tank structural, seismic, and sanitary integrity - leaks, corrosion, cracks, supports, warping, etc. ✓ Exercise valves and make repairs as needed. ✓ Document inspection and maintenance activity as part of the annual maintenance program. ✓ Evaluate stored water for clarity, sediments, floating materials or films, unusual odors, insects, birds or animals. Five Year Inspection ✓ Inspect storage tank interior for pitting, concrete spalling, rot, corrosion, rust, water level sensors, biofilm build-up, etc. ✓ Inspect tank indicator every three years for steel storage tanks without corrosion protection or every five years for storage tanks other than steel without corrosion protection. ✓ Drain, inspect, clean, and disinfect storage tank or use a diving maintenance service without draining tank. ✓ Respond to any evidence of storage tank problems or deficiencies and report them. Instrumentation Daily ✓ Perform corrective maintenance on any malfunctioning sensor loop. Annual ✓ Calibrate each sensor loop and document results in work order. Write follow up work orders to correct each unresolvable sensor issue. O&M Planning & Record Keeping ✓ Develop/update Water Master Plan and Water Rate Study every five years ✓ Develop an Asset Management Plan to manage risk and ensure financial capacity to deliver safe and reliable water. Report to City annually on progress in meeting objectives. ✓ Develop a five-year annual maintenance plan. Update annually. Report actual to planned accomplishment to City yearly. ✓ Maintain logs of water main and service line repairs. ✓ Maintain logs of safety equipment repairs. ✓ Maintain records of valve exercising programs and associated logs. ✓ Maintain employee training log. ✓ Maintain the customer complaint and system telephone threat checklist/logs. ✓ Review emergency response plans and update as needed. ✓ Review O&M manual and update as necessary. ✓ Consider installation of soft-starters/VFDs for well submersible and system pressure pump motors. ✓ Consider installation of an EAMS/CMMS to manage assets and maintenance. ✓ Consider backup power at Mercedes, Flowering Pear, and Franco Stations. ✓ Consider solar power installation with battery at Cristo Rey Station. ✓ Review the adequacy, reliability, and redundancy of the current pumping facilities and plan for improvements. EXHIBIT F SCVWD Contract p%S-6Lj:,Tj-cL4 twil. 54QR A RXIXYLUT1014 F Tqlt eTTV OWNWIL Of FIRE Cl'ky Or MYT-1109171M EX9(;M"l()14'0F t"lt'TRACT OME" THE CM Or p TE CliPERT-110. ANO I ir ".H., WIT& CIAXA. VAL'-EY tad 4 SUPPLVOF TREATED UATRI purcb%sc c-urreutlY has a ::ontrm:e W-or .A tar Distctwhriich vAe ex - ter �Mbdr 5: 19671 apd 1w. an U Aict Ovdr 'rho N.4 ro 01-s. otigitt3l- c0m there ha: the tin,$ oubrai-cumd a new cootrac t" teaCity Incor"'r-atas the Amand, itnd les imp 1, f kqe$ tj�o pyj.0 oich.. the. city h" r a que t e 4:1 voud nd c f icie"t '�Orm sn" lts Unckeeks, the ew ctiattptct is la proplt and Suf ble tb lie CitY Pf Cuipe.rtipo; J.r RESOUVED that the. City CIL'rk 8nd "iyov "d to #94b ntrwct in behplf Of the. City of ruits. &aid co ...VAS mt a reg lar meet.Jng of the City Couw.ft of the Cit), &E.D. 1980 by the u rt of C.Pe. ino of AYES: HOES None AM"a" vol'a ABSTAIN, N'- p " V, A r n R 0 V r.13 City of Cup;e;�rti'tuo ATTLST: jsj c I C;C T--JT t..A%"T BETWEEN SA TA CLARA VALLEY tvAVR 3). TMZJ(-F.VI CITY OF cv-PERTIN-9 FOR A SUPPLY OF TREATEP WATER' T1.4..8 CONTRACT is made and rnt.wed into art Jou-jary 27, 1M. , twwvvvcml the SAN' A CLAR IN VAI i,i,Y WATER DISTRICT, fwcxrvi terr rereere d to as !-IN', 1If1, ;mad CIT.T .01F cum V9.0 r %rel'nafter ;r'nfe"dd t,005, nCgntra$ eior;' and 5'up-em des Vi4w':1k1ate V- 1a -4rntram's ire 4we-eDistrict RTW C ODL actor. A. M.;rUdet:Wexecuted contracts with, the State ' C-ftifer-a Department of to sl ar Res-.. oes and the 034-4 Statue Wr a *a Reelarmatioa heMby Distrietis' lj be-e title? 9 to 3Ceemye bmfyart water and, Di tr ct 'h t;<is-CI'6 to loontinues c+Cit stru "vion of a. ste-r� 3��� htn do jA and ��es of i� rlet: to *ist 3� e� ��t�r b s �c€���e� .. � B, TYsek+4ud-ed: !%Iit�i�T'.c_i said, s���� ���. Z• �i1j��l�.�lt to 6Mr-�a.t px $ ; I�.3 t�:X :�. 'nF¢�i . fi. � ' C-djAt'�ctot 0 dee)raw, of �6btain r-q 4`of 'treated I tai �'#?Tf! �Ia"tr'ict AGREEMENT-. For "Oln e msider z don of the mutual profrAse otd co-veaf' i, o tr .rs 10crt Used in this t 1l.tit3[`,, the f 110w:irtg t�.ra S"'.81 havr, thne rrrr~a rin s r ei after s-t fortb, a) "Fio.cui Year" Mia:tl mean each 1 -nio nth Period during this term l-;€ vcvf ccmmend n July I.O 'year nd tee`€ ill.0tifi$; J-11ne 3 0 of the rmt suvw,eedincr rex. butt; da;.'ew ir:idusi ie. b) - f'E"h i .orrtrpmtr ", or "Other Cor 't aet;v'', Nlra:ll meran atky er t.it a g Publics'- priv€rt.e, cantracning nth Distrkn for a supply �f tricate d eater. c) TI-be "AA" Sfta;li meaty the Swit-<l Cl am `fie ells Water . iwt;rl(I Act, tvs amended. d) ItRoarid" shall mean the Board of Directors of t..ble Sanlo Clara IV,411'e! tv atco*District, 2., des ra of contract 8) This e-onf:ract shall bec e effective On U-M- dale fi t. ubevt written 91*1 shall retna n in ei`f e et for a Pero *C'70 ve Fps or uatF =ll loop-4- and ail bonds, the pr•vcotlas Of sale of Whbzh, have been used for xtvc- CKae.XAMetion of wu#or treatrr,em at i dhA'ibuti*-n FaeRit. I)Pk-v.t- re-tired., whichiwerpric sthall be tanker, t-;avie ecd; lice:%:vc •, uInt ill no even sbalt the term of ttis �-crrrtauc: be, d04N I W extend be w the period authozziwd. by llwwt I. I.4c31Z V22f W The i vrm of this 4cont.rac" may lam. extended for an 4u-' tional ter. Of years upmi s#;reb Wins and € ondivOom M may tw- FGct Nth i±' a wriater, n-Veemant ttre parties azoreto exe t . ak ir, € �t ci tf?erl {18} w�ztontha#YPH W,, tv rexglrya�t�j�o (�aYfp[tho� terrsti{�p�j }�lfi�*e�{.3.�#y{ }'� ��}ce�ilr, A;C [1 br f C tif.)(()j1�,y',}��f.�"�.o �1�:�[�pp�(�Y'Y4yi�#i�.l�l f'�yyfig�ly�ty.'!..5n�t..11��k�j�SkS;'{'SU"CI$5q�,i0'4��y�,�'�Cn#L[;,i��.'L FF�,, �C'��p� {LyI ``EE %%yy Lei ltvaeat Shall tor-�'1 inott � s sp*# shied .isn td �'subsec ion. Z.a .UnI at - least, ent year tr of t.Men f ina Lion :ate rrntr e`tnc it � ;it Djstridt in Sri iM, thai COPAractor.4ewr.es to Pxtend.the tern£ hereort lrr uata Iry :rtt, spar # r � l �ti7i,t o rx .tetx l €i Czar i ad.'M nn periodof five y Upon v u r im, kVe]UITIon and cor' d tlons.he_rein Successors and 110i rs - 511bleiat to tom= PrOW ions of the suCceedifig seetion 4 hereof, t 7i a ,t€�a� f ar a tr tie ms, c-Ovenants, agr'eemen's awl e&Wftions herein wntaincd.shttll nure to The betmot.11 cif and 4abbiding upoa the ueaessors, and assigns of Me par'tt. hc-.r6to. . �nrri i �z a r r or-tr�er b, "o trt�cbwl of th S �c��irs�t r « P 12 r�i? r six itjt:.t lvil s ito e ' ` I:nt ' t iier"` in o �'c,,-il .O vat itrti S�' P ` d hit first ' , �F h?� t a aEpraVal Il strret € *r s ,jsttll ndt be tF EPr' �fti1 ll„Y lr i1E3 hc. s l€{irT T t ztCttw,xti tandtag, Etta cons tit sh 'l b C Ire '.% _ t $s5 ar}Ie3Tt t:.#E 1'ebii 4artcy art?; tl € awe° €�f e.tnfiie at dornrrrrr, �ti>> c:��;sta� lr Public Ag�crrc� ��pr �l,'s' assumes tha obi ixtlarrs of tlra wntree-j And .providM, furthers Owt rf said 1't�i.�Uc Age € -1 es ohty a .0ortion.of the.dtdlgatlt€w of this c6htract"Contrattor shall rernain oWlipted fo the re_rrrti icr,.or tit tht ent'Onnt saetxor shall seIt t as-f 9 or conve anyp art or gaits or its,.Waler uystem to ,k ny er?tity, poblic or privy t , E 6 PLI. ct r may *W90 to the pt relrsiser thereof a portion. of Gu tt_r `ts rt„c rigbts, privileges and ObligatloW herawndeer and, -In the event of any such s SII90rne:at COfttractar• shall Ile relieved of such portion of strci3 .obligations of CO.-tr&Ctpr sa b�lgged -if i Paftw;r�sit�lt saie, tramst €fir corve$uAee, District sltll earrieere sroc to fug rt#s1r tc'ritt ed tv.- ter -to -such erit3ty,ritiict. rarrdct ecrrttr yet w*t.h rt rt ro€rs prior to su h s be, tr ar f r,€ c€a3+v arle- trtit"r�a s t-he anjount or tr tl:ed .w ter de.10,er(W to ttdlr entity 10, earner fit. inmok it W. #. the mareased watt.^ require -Thetis of saele tlty-resulting from mch isle, trwrs:€-el* or esrr�veyari< 6. Ad sgt.rr .of Schedule l r�r=vita. s-c on t_3rer ntcr Service to proie(red 4 �..�, Service Ar en 10161. ��onte aetar' lr�ts prepared ar,d swbnli.t.ted a trr�i.�seti Water delivery sohe %let ,l istrie3 to r apr ensu' i4.-' 100 y - ert . itr *eO0r nfC ittt z rii,I 1 eref irr rrrr, nal ie a rtici{ titre of a €t relianc°e :Upein pro*ted Water service bar contraetvr tv its emstir.ng or futureaustojam. whmceive err would ;receive ser•vi€re within a. serw.ee area WI-tich shail be d0fined and ray' be a, niended from tlrti€r to time by ('011traftor° and atkachad hereth, AS Exhibit it ,and 'ire S-Chedule hag been aWroved awl rtm4de Wndinrl :t-pon C ontrrt.otor in accordance wit)) article H hercof, - id WheMI in lieu of nil -dct€ fr .any Wiley, Oublic Ot iiriv ite. sir€r!i thet�eia:fter peovide trcwted water service WOW W sraclf eti tcarrtv'rs and ttte. zxi.stenee of Such eircunistarmae and the ne€ e_s,%i ty c r cantmv!..Ot 1.0 reduce its deJYv aelreOaelc b6ing shoiviri to Dittrict and rtrl: owle4ged by D s£rit_q 4o he tact lex��t�tcr€e�r-�sw sold delivery sebv,6j:Ie :;hAII tit its t## U611 be amended lirurmptly in suchrium.er IAS to rESdu.et C 011trtrntor'rs scltOuled Nrater pardhases from District hC."C. rider" by im arFrtOu"t fairly.rraa eo„ensurate with .stta h reduction of O: htractor-"s anticipated -)r rajected water 1 GC731- 9 B. WATER SERVICE PROVISIONS W460 sebadilleg .......... On OeWber M 1q$G ani, ov 0Y t3azee.900; thaToafter, c6m'rfi�eor .tcall Submit in vAtkig a.. pm*044.1fory. se-hodulm fir t vr-umg three s per f*d jxonnf"g jug � Y 14; A-0 ng year. Vbg aform .shall t4 SO i- ta opt, : Proposed &-flivery t t'�4 tjot he Dla strizt n4fndgll 'd e'the Amountrzl of tmite;d Yfuttr desir04 by. Qostir.Wr rrt tha. 0131. t href­yr Oerlod, Ex"..pt 41 pravi&d A Subskilon 6.(. �eatj6R-, Cmltjsjkbr , that in subtapro ftyag a .. *Cdwater 4elivery ufthtd'we ti WIM, D5 peredat athe am-ount fo*eom fistail Year corAttrinink-the M-Axi mum mou,nt In the i'vitrront Ury -Ylw uhl . ess 1. 11; :...'_ � , . ;_ schodu, coaractor hal b'U'VO U jWr!ft1d'­ ..A ption oe its to as 911 d'MrSIP11111YI ;ncAtA '=I Pik �tTtlhie brcM"'Olt fAtiAe A, 115ection 4Ae%Vt4.0rsenfed � ic ­.�Ch 69Wgj1ment',.. Pr or Xse of a rwndw t he'Pmvislosmaif ArficleA on 0 oi2�dtl 11,14 rrence qr'Am-t' ct t' anl M the OT0.90. . -orth!'q 9"d 1 W Shall :appl -Y i.111YAO kit tausmigned pwfi6 j Contmet,brts right-q arid. Upon rek&eipt otzu'ch dellv4y sn"It d4!�, Disti- _Aafl review and after -em.1sultatio"'I Vvit".1 Contrietor and -0thor Qqqtruetors - make soxh reductions th4rebi aS'fire- :C0TWStcBt WM r)Uvim's fibilit, too Ila wev6r' - thaf;': S-ubject to AY0aWlJtY:bf..fuhd5, fjrA�._q #6es. Mid bp6rptlhg� k& MGWS'.Dlstriet W11 . .. .1 . .. 1;1 . I - every rcrosonatyje effort to approve "eac!) rurlwc ffmdule Pi 4.delivery'K submitted by. Cohtraet= and other Con rectors. .'Except Wprow4q,01 in subbsecti.i.)n e of this's"don. Distiq6t ilvthkt it Wm app.�Dve a delivivy nhodule for -sail, I'll 0.1.1edule parfod WIU01 W:not :tom len, in toW oi-snount.for ea!:T Sear 0 $Zlild'achedult Oenbd than 95 Percent oftile ma -mum fisbal years schedule peirlod. Not Yvi thstandhAg the previsJoils .b ASul ' n--eet.16m a and b of thisse-Ptior-1, either Con"T'neter Or Distdat gmy esquest Mat' the aflillinum..40no TA of miter for eaah risers* yeae.-Un Wz' eAsuirti; t11r-.yw Le'I Lle period 1*_�e resda"ed -to a mst"r *uyiMom 41r"wuot Ulan precrihcd J61 Subsections: a and b. Upon writteA Ag , 4Y b"Quil Rue., Dist Net, hasod op a -whow.ung of #Xtr4'mdjnary tlat� clahvery schedule may b+ .approved u.t The apprmred Jvery s0hp&le Shall be tmu,mitted to. ('onttatttor pr'or to Mcemlier 31 of tho. yepwr in which the propQSed eterivcry 4(!hPdWc is vubmitted. The rk -4�y s-9ieciule for small proved doive years 19.76-77 thmigil 190-81 is set forth In.FRt �,xiijWt i ,.a hereto and by this referance made in part. hvqcar. r ' ' Opersiti a€l��dq0p1zx`EiiY ng pur't mms, � � s3Li .f.:�safi+r a Llcip-i ted m+l}itmy em '1.thttW ia"`ia P-Year 'and. 'V1.mk 3yx� i .fir by Dis �ety: to eter^�tta�{>� projected /€rastion �Iq'Mawo- y�����rTy pc I "Ii'€�+q.�� :eij��.su-Ing . V w�:yea-�P+��ygy�il�t{���{�-i-{£.�rX it ow �yd�.yyShy}:}ydUs'���.1} %3the sad ,is�7 4f `*rSt t,iVit sAG?174 i. ��t(r3 €'fiW t � �Lj.. i.:i�6' 1�HY^VLLlii* 'a -.. . m- nitt en�tk�b :'[�]imtme receive, Me am6ua .� of wSI. sei. Ito. �1 r a oi�ard ccciN.x-'.f"t3 a i.noowit's of Le i SYa3t€Y 1 eii eire F to ontmet-Or rcr ft&rpc : stet �€rti -e a i:•rerf. 2= 4<.m6;IIIU Of lyiatLy Raf o ,rrf (a) District gees liyf to One eaet year or irge; ionai f k"Al yearlpf th fi:on radt; : t 113 i7111}+ Y f t flrli+3tmts rtre t Water set roto on t,xe := ru' c de i ry �Gr ` G$ .tTI' Ctff�Cls , 'is; l '.year, as lay. i k1: TArCJ 4i t etv M-1:e!,}gc{'°i` to Contra etim %I",fi�.}Ii 1 iifi!}p :t m L2f'tie , t<'_'t at lelst 1.S i 4imrlt of ;i10 xa m " 9 11ount of iP to4 we -ter Which Dist&t t 11(W 'therew'f o t`:tii�;i f 1i,tsL t 3 Con tria{:`to {juriri the s ol i dable fiscal year ba 5hs3 .l ixln (d). lstrratr farther 'i reel t fat v:xde f =3itz n;sa l of deRve"kiligapz 1011 deliver tiirc amour) water".�i.-eL --b&, b aubseict'So}15 a and b o this Seati x on domand of �,���ivtc t : as t rat .caf ft;��v gyp. =tcj era te]dJi? PRki'iitittll3t ia�ttiPl}L�vtE)ii�t€ Ott�e`Bt3afi ''- i Y.,,:�`;+ Sa'". �Eu-lf' expressed t25 iir} OC16iv46t UT iforal flow tato over The full to& an aggre'gat,�, or i 2'.huvis 36. itgy'M+L1nti] and fail` StiCli Ftc1{il�lti�i �' II{ rr � � any t. oigtrl Dlstiti'tf t -,ih ..mPa ilityto ei.wev at �.il i•tl.t"�. i 3 43V dad that D"trict, ;8t 's} T tires. C1uring, tb,-- R";'mmtitdO o F F:tt s1'fi%i 1 'h'1! l ` t it fa ,' not }3. i7 1"heeapa. ty to delive'_} a: y A rete, may redude,4ia h rats tit as it3statii ous al tx!!Tq :.I f.kw rates ttat t * exce6d 19a p6eoah_t br act iuittt l viols v O ress d war, dgWy'atert't "uniform flow rote Orvor lhtt fttii t) NotwitbStanding the foes&gIrg2fg,durjW he '�rJ� d4ii�' I* Arne "n7 tT� : i.:."'t._ 4t"S may i�i�}i4 S;." .L��,.a�. t 4m ..t.;w :1'"ac.�`r. for . , .'i'.fit} _ bd}� �i�y traotor to 180 ".#era.ei't of a. theo.. we atSnua}l, vt��x�ie of that Contractor prm OS an i~�&Il:. W 't .ti}� `1 3 'w _i?U ' "VIC UR 131.'@%a P,z t�'�i't .9 ' = give grata t€ i rr r Pr'lor rat ee of a€ y sued Ppro t: llga t �t rn0.4r11_um flow r*te. 3. Delivery trtirt.urp,$ a? stater delivered: to Contractor pursuant to (this CQArac ;Rl bo Provided from DS.4'tYtct faeilitl.L ti rmg� � deliyeq str mires to he i"ie ted 4a rsuelt locatiois as may be mut-mily aweed uv�a, ! ;4 c:> Lvery. s rueturga:l?ra.bc designed =1;i~on-s.t; a cteO or Caused to be cor t:rt t�.d by 1'Wri ct. Deslfra rnd girl co ltS ,'ShmiI be subject to favorable revi.ew rated approval tq the Contrtittor prior to awwd of 1OC312 eons truett or. nstruettor y�3pJ'oigri3 ct� for 3I. tie � :a °° � +Kp'#�yi��t� Sy�Qry . ytti{et a;t �?iyayfiWY X 1! lliii o �.4 la d, eptomat'ed colR'L#-�I�v� S��.tT ���f.r�: sYRi3� s, �vF�i:.iY�.�i'* t r sk r �ru4e f rrlva porn n :uf dh 'said str;aet - it jg, , d t`csittrs t r stet pav:the. tlil o ' a r trtn .t ? he v. or dO e .i€ # c} II1h bf t' tr etrkeS..ems so1-d d v and tis t r ho.vil 0 €t txit _ t4ae r i"= t• :t r. d t° r of. nCe iA.a:*a 4 Part IV. "Upon 'tiAr ty. () tWw "tan movex Wallet, €e(i€ "roe►t `Sit t3rMgr tt �vc.l t .•i to t, & uisits'an d`i ftjtatjoq an r`� dvM o clr a.y € b ; .. -T)js rir t L t e ttf`tt°�lattt to o such Wit to boborne +Gtan�ra0tdrk. In: Erie ; t±tt e ti "n-te proves b how; C9eAlve .shall try t tt°i a Ufa ri.tter:;zt!itr'lxff�strs�rr fzss t 'gnats n d.t:#�e etcr i 5 t tcy .�v4irrie b Coptractor. � tit, eat su osfiir awt : rac+ 1 t tzar high Drstriet :sba,11 ir afund 0 Contraotor an toy t'bo : erenc�e Ix. tva °tie actual -t~r f fit} rat �.d theF mad dest. atiftV cry s -,Uct and to 611 epx3ar't ti r td d. irlurrtie ;rtir r'ol use" tad it itic:e4f:irr ill hit ' rhtig it3rrs ct res t t ttis'r� t t ress t:t t °�tcr and st an be �.no; V%. ion tv aap r,te,' atxrt-in. r "� #aee , t tre1 mo*slw a] 'Water nddeliveredtLO ortr r"tir ad rrrarceUratp,ndr�t�te retrr<_ thera,trtR t cry xek ix; ser tst ins. #ta:l: itr"t 3 , pera wnd onointaiq iat.a ll Uvery steuctures sac h meoUrft, deva (s and equipment as we sausf t tery t� awe to total por"tims. »� �d1'trr it'TlE±lt ;i it ' �" utrl�n iilte tanci' Reriod's —. T pStPi t art .33233 F aff r aasar°mb'm a*ffof ,.cT pFc Udlo cmui-�UouR Ser vi&e to C-5ontr actor l,"ui may Lr rr,porar lu 4�isectltimie C°� redWc# the daiiv4y water to colS1 acivr o ��7E .?ij rNa� of pver,trggaflo , tr tx .rr, rn f.r t � €�, repwr Or PeplaCeMeW al rIrrY �xf t: E ti.rli• meesma.py for the dr:livery qf trwited water t"n w`*ntrsictor.} zr t t..r3 i% n itaay C:ot7trrte# ar €ta INir trrr advhn"t Ms bossible of ahy d6montititiance or roductim) and err till.)RtV4 duration of such:`dises srti,`r carte Qr re :�. �i uetloa. n zlr t �. contrat'l r W rely on Dlslrlicttv'r-Oni tern Eapt I ddivarim;orvotor pr eu; ri duringp xis # v���Cer �ay;�;�r�sti ra :..tariritr� iaerr �=max°.. �istt� et r��. ��� �� ,:e .�t4 hit aaft'a l,� #-*rtczt!•z€�ut ttte term of this: € on't-remt to `r-r'rake, sqYY mi'n ct_IscEmitim.,ance.4w reduclter j-1 tha Iteltve -y of vrttt(r only durihv tt:e-l) f NoE Os hhaYm . I a tl �-wetxt of eny dftmtontlmiwmp of be redtielfon its dalivex of �rattr, E'dntraator may eIe(-t to re eve the amount of i4ater wart 7atherwise �;�c�ltalc� ia�V�O br=Vr4' tltr� oigteyi; drr� s r<i� Y# Ltr't#.1i�.Ca: 3`'ii'lJ i�t-Lrt3'* r'v.�il#t.i�lrE4i{��`'.L33'1`i.'b..C%iri;7`t "�'9.«': during such year, oan.teitt .�rti, f}tsta ict'.s de fivry ztfaiitltl;derin the titan etr<rat doli veev sebedt,lasof AH :Other Cakt°act6r& r' csf fic r c Rpm D - aul t - if$ t oi` (went an acf ul t by ('7011trOctor in tht.Oil nent'+�t terry syare .i° tir?:ir°ed t � are ' s .r tit :Uric" ttereu€ader, ti tr°iei may, upon rest° ins ttttzr, t], sree months, written notiet to C*Itrraetor, sw rrt rtta3itla� 3e r w€tt r rMder tbis P(a"trtiet `€t.so la its such dctault t+Au eorctinue rvov,s ;, 110WOvdr, that dtr in such terkd contrector slhail rernsin obliL-a"e€t 10 rjvaa e all t►ayrnLpts ;°eW."iced Under this eont:r4xrr[ and Provided, further, t? t �__ttch dr rrnqt,;nt amount shalt acepsae inter-est at t'tfe mte of fine-t-k-lt` or 011e peroont ptr month e�aanrn� isc:i� Ore 1 he 5 V R N! ffj 41 ' Nj di to of sur--h .vqnount sino froi amou'at -A -1,4) Chrfpr.arr' 41)(. thereon drep&ld In jful�-,, S'I^Plt s ji nsi vevy pe 0.1% of deli Pursuant to VILs Seed xi it 01,1111 riot 4eptli'me Dfsixtct of or jiglit pro-med. t)y ft, * Vont Lmet or -by )-,Aw for the money dun- ar Whifei" may bee-Olne &W, under tKq cantuaan the vvnt of any disqU7,atment biF!,vreen Gorttra,c,tor -md Distc 'a* as to the a -mount W" mvi t411 rem.��re(; to Gmdrarutur by, Disiritt., wratAx semice slall 110t.tj diseoritirwoed if -the ditputrel amou,,jt tile, on de -t—Ptith, J)j�str. fAxil IL Irm proel-We J,eVj:.1-W mid adk4i Oat of f0y- bill, as Set forV-i An Art --I- C. StVuon. R, heren't, 71 WntNi 'Qualit mu Dl�T.rktt aft Umat all Water to I e dafivem-, 4v it. to Coritrulutm, pursumft Vic) termi, of this Coptumt. will � peso's fr-,Aut)jC taw "'wa.1thful wid tbat all suclrl Wal(n, Wrs;i ba of wutivq may to Us W fOr dOmmAle purpwies at tile pi Eat, Withh'ut rlwttkar treatmen1% TAstri-pt understwids Ulat C-*,Arac ,kL(,W is A -Pwl.e uVilt V, f-veniswrl water to 11.3 ms-tom for domestle purp(reas t4- OL be efelli verpd. by it, 4.0 PIM w.1ror t Cone metor bo de)av,�re-e! .144-vtm- Omer u4strict: rees e-un-jel, will by :Coftimftor to ur zl. its. s furt o ystem r-hvaj it)p tonsirm aerated dQ6 P9 the l In he�,-e_lr to 8 izard-n with a perTnit or per n !I L 0& temporarrm 3qbefts, tOg ed.. -�Ftmr, by ih6stgtt - in, 4a-�t-jj 54- Y" f, rVjOL m.)P104 of. �,i+ w.7). Of H tK= rect,,11?1 b District. Dfi�triet Qreos 111'"t th6ti-�Ated V+a.t4r, deti, to p ra .. .4 . Y . .., '. . : 1 1. - - - Cttyr rsuant It -1 n "et fc -rx pm o this contrac I QW1 e�.&; for,, t, t c::Wml�t in t, 0, t#=, &WTCPt primary and secomlar atidards; for t Y xtj P�mkes,.Ve urovx,� qmw7its and t"ni advpted tky Ithe CaWortd-u S.Tatt DeparOuem u,7 �Imvqlth� 811ou1d the.need ar6e, P. -Wrtri at and CTntrac, uw wail e�oop-erata f ully IM fidiusting their respretive. p"Wele-SIS-1-14 to the ,;Xtftnt reasrmably prai-VICab1c, and 'provi Q-4v"d sueb 840, Y*Ustrn�gm 40 nol affect oihor Contra -lam, to aid the Gryltractor in to such law cow R�-1 (!j.strih�ijo,n s,ystem. A RTI C-G E C, P A YNI L, P4 T P13.0 V lFil 0 NS The PlVaimitN to bo made by Contractor.a.116 1.�&Ch C. Ontm-I'mor for &-JiverOp t reate(i w 41 t tr strut be 11 pla - i cc p ��,r a cre-foot bmsf!4, - upon the priclag pofivry ao'nPted. -tty -tho. Reard. duted junuary I a, I v.71, as from tin, n, to true xnenv dedAZ i ch ti set forth. I't, 1), atLachi-NI, (iml,o alid by.tlmg refertnw- mado a part. 1.Zm0f, usid sh-all be t1m total of the bask, -water elatrges avid treute�i puzeb.urg# w. dextermined Vy the Dlstrk=t UO.f1rd fo.,, eac. ,h ,I for Whi�,qj-a raej%:,(�jfOjje is efftvtive, 2> In the above elwqgts, . 1. 31-s� blaSiC Z alt�^ Charge Shell" be OWvVl to DiMtric.1% groumdmiter chw—ge for ivater Wihcr thg.n agriatil.-Wral 1v-,4ter tsailu rorrh 119gricultural water" beirW defl-ned iti the Aut) in Zone W-2:, %Ttu(;ql stqA11 ngf -,d be �(k v n I n a mally by flu- Board it) am!or*d411,rX:1 witll ttic, legal provisions fi;nd ewtoirclylellu. of Ole Act; provided. howevt-t-, ihni Y•!lg ulch rat-- pvlod tkie ],Mst et w-fil comidar j anticipotW f'tv eaeb suet rateperi-od and wil,11 tb orttir9 full uAte Deriod. 1 $ V N�itnic[ shall charge. for. the delivery of tri-.,ated Water in a(- orftneu, wA.h rate sehechite for -orul or �(wrice As SU-0hrate schtxllwe is cstutliifheu, by the 13oard. The Board of Directoi-Li �Jiajj risvietv uric rate 80,edwie every Olpekz yvxl�-,- to dc"Iermine WUether the sehe(tile is jil neeordance with V* un-wg rove -nit ard. - revenucu of Dist1lel. Aveorrlip,,-Jy, VIC R0,4rd shAIJ, oit ur +buut the s,7;cord 1'aisdny M ,' Mrrell 198t, oot -Nitar Itlarl Xwil 15, lqsl,Fail;'1&b ?k Fail;' W.khcdule ftr the rale pera'A coult!.-.n.t011"r .Iklly 1. MAI through ,lam nw = rr 119,'i4, and stv-.11 folim% snid pro-ce-dure 1 OCS I 2� VRMI 4/z i i+.a 04ch ensuing TIVef'' Ycy -ar perlr:7, Fach gercia rats' gej�je( uif[ stiilr��r t,.,:czve ki CqkVratioo, twt Mull p�-ovitte fear trio r°bc�,,ucry of expelleaNves to be recavere 4 by Vio *ur.od water tharro and the treRtad water- stire-harge ue rlrw ti-re pe ,*4 84d rates rare 44.eyfleet aria ftn,, swortages Of eeverae for Wei eVertrlfii=retr fret irr. y hai r fee;,, per e ceet jng the Preced, ng r#R#e per]oc tt N agrto tfirr - tk rates to taip so -led shall Mt 4$0 carkeiisonabler or twWrrary, #Ml lie Wised jjpon reinabfla estjr tc., 0f oo3t:;� and pwater ectuf ire �paw � tjTf t#ea {tl;e r n � fgr : -�rtor� and QVixer contrue' or , 4W all p h.the pm%OW;N Ptfti.4`".r ' Prjv*ULP-y �. lurat.tu*�i. inn, .i��ted water tr''F3i:�f y7kf�6`�1t"..`;L� ri`h�yii:F'a'.E .'i �i�E the.ptt3iit Of G' S' S ' #3 crli c t' t i33 is N ;friet i�g_ee 1.0 3� ; � ��:�t .i i l ..ut t:t L. i °fillfs Wit' t.tO ee5l�t t. It, rep tither ComrRet m., j hd sic�� vpn5rornllq Ln setuors. 0 �t+'11t Ol r'te 5011iiJ i- t k1 tr3i'r T'3'$% ±'tali& ? ';}1CYli#P 4'Js$4 It .e dlnZ the Mspee l o l�rta���MIS of tre-ated wter fft:€v 44 t",sait? P' C w larr t pad' DaStrlct the tote or t � get :Cc t tfr on the rtat Pcf 0drdt . t« uri rg bo kr ad r eel rate: sche"e, are .effr t vc fo,- ail W ter -dcalvere . tr . t`� Mcaiatactsr, t�vtct tat itxuotcir[aIi Pay TIst.aet t;a "t#l531i13ii. your A�a�ftc bt to. Water scher#tt ed tea bYear, rel rnia ft rrT r= r 1 # �• :er r eta nmtrt of �0 ,Od` �t�r ,t� ill t� tpr^ 1 €rattr>t t e t watO'to ivi d �ti �z�it�ae�t frig kit t :�year . hriiii the {zprov verycea ra=rdec", f€ra3^r ttarrtfrAt�z� r. riy :the yoAr i3�':ttle £"il`:1"t'i:$ i$ soh 31i3 Quad : i*'h 3{is,��f�3Wi�d Nftt C t �� '3 ''� p e .oaf the Water fit.& �ju1ed to be r1:6 3 to err aeu We a iaf n s s tta rg : deliver In tra: fs rc,0nt fr-r -ch h yam' tar a r t a init rw' '.i-11,N Ch r'ato S(*.,V.,�Iiale erlod h! ,irf�",rcl°a ontraa ietieiv-e31;0SLI OM 40 4,*e tt.+p tale treated water as ghown era t e pp'.aVed �" Tlv_r yer:e€Titi * irrrl If e€ :r has lair .'l rkr�z t tar Such riaarauis i a ralirratrn ice# it t "Oar water not -det vereb to it,.Ct�tr' .jhall :glue: the r: g t to .r keel-ve; xti r iirie4e4fir 'jpq .wtz3 r"r t�rzthiaaat ar iti�if fxrr+�at���t s arzn; thc7�.i°erriainoer, of tho 4:hfun jja++ ent r aTy�Cw'x !hft! ±le po}piedat times District t x�� the dealK"l��'�� t` pubilrty pivvldim rugl,,�rePe, hQ%�ever', t i"ab If ill any ary of any r ur ng .tha terra her0w4 t3f 'trl t, for May 1a+7a, irielratlrrrgrce tlellv'ie t�rriwri€st to te.pr±airts tier t3 Irw,,c:crf, shait a ab! to irciiver treated 'water Co .rtr Bier . ri rain. &il-Munt equal to L, 39 of the T: ra MrrVlt LOT.Ithlw >~c:)led UA"r7OUnt try S.et t6rti,' in Article 5, Se+et cra tte.I say eX�. iairrr€i daifyvdlurfoj the, there anaairte�ri stwIl be t1ased. upon. an arno ni, e!,f water isa o°!'0rsi�ted who :n fi.km 4 rerlue�ez tay an dr OUht e%M, .r l to, the reduction. reqt1ired by, Wis. - t .for each day a re&6 �,l:r{��i�r ;s t'�u:irc.*d lad If Ir€ glary day Of MY yOMP uri the ter in #aet`pof V=::.tr:itt stja,:i off or to e:luer te? Cirataa,t,,xxat= rtic�i shalt f.ft t a meet aloe e�ualty requirel.—cents Sept .forth in Article 8, Section `f`. leer , then Cfmtractor Mig—f havi� the alga to rf f rtgc- to ace.ept cr^ i�ec Ie .liez of water Dij%t itrif.f3tth i=r= eas se: to*ter ag rr;eet said c5uabuy.rt=quirp eiat.g. In i<401 event: J�stractor shall. frraiiia t}iatt=j notify PlAriet, and Confirm. a xcs'cira� ��titlrirs 3 as �E then Im yin rim of y ire r px.�'ird. €n any e,t;jeti ver+r the tiller, mini MUM Ixe arcduC t>y tare ainount -utina to the Voltune of water re(Ne-ecl by tide.* £110ratTAtA4r UP to all anav .;r.,.t vqlal to :1,,3Q of t;)e t"�70n curre it ntanu,iy s^lr i?Pd te3J4',g. aS iOt fOrth in Article 9, Seetion �6-3•v;ce r5 so refused. a' ?'c+s�;�:: ; t)Y gj P 'i.`rttrtraf'ifJr. If I �^ at I Lie 3 L i`,OFVT 4/2X.,&v any timc; or fron, tim-e to time durin:7 t- A_g he ter-m the right toratu." to pecept Water rerf-t Ngtrif't by reason Olt vtm�- , J149PM-Aw-OrMot 'this L%Ibsoetian 4b, hu.# 0YOUJIdneverthow- (all .to excr6sm -"Wh riijbt, Sha-V in tic event tkr. to Waive or Itivit extrelso vrsudb 01glit ' 0610MIC1fir. T-NMAPt AW ICA f0vth by thO foMgOlrl� PM-Mifarm 16f this nit -4* , C-;qpfrq not be obl, gatad to p ry for my vveW ri-vt tly j l'crttuti dulalmd in this See tion 4 aftAl11W IV any Way 14e fjoc-,-hod to it c6atmotarls, abligaVIVA tO PgNr for -z)11 IWO aqv;�pted by It f —n pvnsprime mte !W fer-th from time to time �a Distriers thor, appAi mmie wlv�le. C) If in ally yenu* dulring vie. tares 114,eor, tie Boam or 1.�irvnars Of aball by FooluL"Orf PitCe in (West a !,vafer reducton p 4ruo in acme w Of to poraehtt of normal use tiptip Mhly soh& -'Wed amount-1 vor rortions. -khoreor, as rpt forth in Articlo le, ftw ttmt portift Of the year when %vath walon-'. rmAx- progtam is �p Vr6oll,shall'be reduejed by the sanne require, tT. the Water. "duct. 0! pi-Ograrl less �e �*Ql b -porepunt, Th Ta ae-oorewic 'Uistri' t stmil Ofte immi-I With Odund amclfttim praC;t'iCfe, hilt t lip, Ojry ep te 01 ttw reav en u es rapre i VAW : Oy It vr pr--Mod, rJtW]1-r,- the term IWMoVa? from the alb of treaterWaterto Contra Ctor mid 01jW (.7,on traetom- from the SaP3 of raw water,. sit -0-t-trow3h.-Collection Of the grmi char ge-, referred tol n Artie 15 fi, er 64-4 i W. exesed O'd -L)m, te, ictt Costs d empiiruc-, em6w, such year, ar r-atp perjad, Mstrict. 4jall retain suoll -Mcms-' and reserve Ox emme for Pllrdhtsr?,SQf I-EM dter, C01,15truction, MRiht 4-Ode or opi��nrktion of laxistIMS or udditional fROCTWOS for U10 kpp�>rtflt I ioh, eomervation, treotm-ent or wh 01 sale �O:atrihmion of watq-fr, reduc'e Its t;k-lLeduled p-Nee of tre4ted water or, s0ject to the prOmSionsuA the Aet., redui,* said. ppundwatter Dart; . It Is muder.stood hat 19he objee. in eorhpitU -.p under this Oulitra-et is to Cover ti)O costs rie3atiF4.10 le Unportatfoh, Comerve'liorz, treatment ,or wjxwlesal- Wwfbutlon of water. V.'aler - The terun "'Orin-COntrac-1 watler" refer is to aeated Water roluld'ClTr for defivery txi tbve treiLted to tflm gobedided amounts. lon-Wtrum wter may 'be avitable cW_,�,.4t gtwb times And suOpplees as determinM by tivl ahgiriet, Distrietwill rplify Cont tructor in WT-Mlig. LhOMOL Veliveries of nou-zantraO Avater to Contraotor wH1 onty 44 made ftfw- Cunt,metov has purehased 'LOD peteent of the.-monti. dy Sehoduled alROW 05 apt firth in.. ARi 0 8, 1131�, tion 1.(e). Vorther,.at th4.4W:0'f 6 W-) f lsaml year an -adju$tm,5w! ill bil-11";W W1141 be made and Contructor will be required to have -paid for IOU of the v,pproved dolivery scheduled am, Ouj1,!t,'N$c, any OtbOr Adjustments bt-foro the puretumfoof mn-eo-11ralef water is Gilowed, NirhW aqypixiod:ih jr- uo*,. Rvallable and Contractor fakes- water in ax6uim 61 M svheduled amount, Sueth w-nl,dr Wul riot am.] Will, be ehargeJ fer at the 1714 marpet prim tvq, ter taken ill oxm-ts of Schedulthl amounts duri%r jrwlads O�hm non-e-ontrael wati�r it not 4i'v*ailable may, be cretIfted ss a goat of Guntraotors minjaAmi a4mal ettarge. 7. Flillinn - Billing's Stall be In&& Monttdy vs f-u,[Jows. On c-r atAoto t.�ne fir,51, of eaf"4`1 InQ-.itb UN, C—t Win -,laid t:o co ntrfictos .0 bill xweuiutv-d in aeeordnni�,Q With Oe-_ PJ*Mriajons of Article 0 hureof tor all 1 1-00 wate,- AC-Cepted by Contruet4r from Mz,,t,6,4t (juritz the Precedingmutith. The final hill for melt Meet vear!-Omall ilvlvkk� ly "mms dv�e fc,!' the 1101J.-nUM Charge reimired by Artlele C, Section 4, j . IcF-P(yr. r.)jstt�o* $1 -V — I . k all' 'mpkl i.m 2t orrs tt t pia Me jast 'ay of two : 1 irxar r t� , a r i z.;tram &U111 Ib eatii' tI ma el such k*:ad ft9s fhrPe. 4-Ors Ivior to Me 0,a r f a.z C41OAtar TPIOR♦f,.7i or withi oo day-. i Iter �.a �d21i# o 46 I "1Yd r month. C `4 Me And. MOWOf p i r:a "t Wit 4 da s A£t5�� bg DUINIet'. M tits ttiat t t3 f 1 .ti wetwacy it a- , f b1 -,.�c . -itt Wit � € t to this 1-0tv I 'irgtrivt dce th wr W. l.�t v"_ 4 *�priorto Via dOhLqh MY €t yt#tf*tty1�; ltt # I �e}tryt� #iyyydue. `6yt'y1�1e t* idt! t{,_,t.r Icsgtt'"��t(#'�1 {���"�{���tryup Q ` �'t. M 1'b*M'3�LYu +$k16iS.LisL e r aTPr It, AM , Re W, s'm4k)e y� t rt o� taw arxOit, ts tm at, dt=e . extent t; ft 9trs : & . rind �`�r�tr��tr ' c ���� � �t t� t�� t�°� gatIf+r ref such cottrrtlu,r W. Yedup"lt ��iatty�t`pttt���} Iripuf t17f if�y1 yitt't �an�+�r.}be�pfeyt�y4te{�zNaXLtYey { d ratyy m,pa#q thy� f } y� . - W � t 3N144 j 43 Ai:.�l�} t_�� F3*. 8 vale .,reo, t'.�1 [41 .w"Fe �fe'a�.F Y�L#J'V''rtr i��i*�+ b[iF} MAT ques-tonon from r : v V uir ir} cvhtch 3r r t ettt A water >itagbi tin �9 4� t.�tril t r}r enc}ge in tt.e S.-twily 0t watP. flable% elav r _# !"' erg,. T}t�ty€# ty€:tc+€� of t t' d4ti , f. i^_.x 0' water, re ��, ems, tp ?+r4:fin�ij d;ir.ia:; Li :':9w'�Futir7Tk.1i ... ON to t er-14i +e water pttrst nt o the tote am'jar Federal (ttr64_,i +tea ilvr t tea` txtrt att[�r:' r of . �.. - durate...: 2P s lte re d Ot$ean ; _� ttrr € of sue"Idelltr tea ntr t dIrmUr fmt crotindivot& 1.1,90Argo P.mup it tp to prov s r)f 1-I'm ret,�Ode� I€at� 1, #urtd'Y r�tu+�t an to ��lvetti r ill taerome, teem -,try it the tremf4d Writ . mvirememv, set f--6ral or %Ire pprvv d dielivery $e1jedule )1 Csoaracto .tale Ottrer _ eta t m are to 1?r 9net, I a^trt t` Y< Z ; t f re =e lcteitt t€'a=eri_ to €tl t :tc 1= and Qqh& C1oxjtf°_.gets., ,. rat c, w ldt l a' 'Mattcat of a rteui6u water (As Vm the . t r � t oth t" t• rtr.fe every VtWK bm Senl.—ear lrj=. ! ti t tt t41 t t t fcAc�`,!�1n g:, napat,V, t1tvt rr tit t 1ets.ofjr a04d livered tgrtculiraIvt= +tt.n t11 p► i!} thfoo tiseal year tattltfpli el 1 tl,e ere ti e # v valtt l l fsiri i t r et,,. f .water Ir its Trott taxYd cede-� urcres for fageieultta-1 tie is iia d n ttt tatty .lrtzd edc Y at an rt3 Is re:dur Od to s6tt l"t r rs€ tt t r or Ord €: 3 if ;may recl€7 tt ttfi r wl v6rle ref treat ,d rater shp',1 bo me €e +�e5�j f ll:at in t*a 3tz tt r r.. tr t d flea pumunlft to ate. prQvl4!-,1Or5 of tile. :fits fin •taort 7 and l r trict T 1 r -duce .eli-tvi� O.f tt teu jv#ter t� �ntraet Oran , ti er ('04tractor$ 9n Y arn6 ant wwca i _ta�rar ttBe"me PrOPO,{#:cara. t a total tmt of se#t reetratt:ltt t# rt:unt Iateluded :a r;aeti tom; e4 �uu tea• €ma's approveu1cttt as duld be -f the amoij it IF{Ie4 in tlle approym delivery schwule 'a Qoatractqr o.4 Ottlef poif"etfUs fOr that 1'is I �* k', r�l. � vier rtrtr;}ed by lfeslei; ri�u34e � t tri ttsay Apponim) on sonse other basis if sulzb i= retrt}f�cl t a :!,eet } Tiai7tt Ft ni $Yfl tor d4 a Wtie s4 V.1y ► fire r(aL("O+jora. Ckfi'�t z#t8t On�jfdt [tY�'r the year. t ttt # tt r e to tl C"4 -m- for ?r6 ritbig Promptly in the event Drag �u&ir- ut q, h): t 4lYu£ rt t —contractor and Other coni-raet or } stuill be d t'lr 9i a Uss mad COTICUIT et *} '= .. of Uwam t vtsuahfleldudtfOyi Of Wry € r€V_,s in ContrrA c r afsr=. e titer t s € yi {. lt 'Ot be�; *,,Wri. to �: dell, to monde^ f t Tyv) tnts hem► pt°r3v dOdi Swab ratiu bWby t €. x r y t�ti� ret::s ► eyc ntsre�3 3istriet Distr�iet 30 gins "_tt�ntreetor W14tten mtbze fer�. e ` r Eir�t# tr, tf i f x e a -we which s b f )r)i5tx',ct erc e-s t) t'tp1 ��h or modifyk� t 'tr 3 T,t to �. iitfiL�d i pi a 11( Heir act fix t� f 3` y a e � tFrin ier ttric�t furb eg:t . that it t ure R5 t}� .Mt4btatt�of sALer ¢itgitb���� 71 rt dwA of t furl ' # �s d i ,te € �t t3 s rtxu r char at tt rates per n..cr�-fit try ��� t�'stkxCt i Bch s"at f.iifty : to " t s r: ar: of the s� c F.1imd nature Qf' the wet.er iecvi" i� reudered� GO r`Q— thz f ga t ur t crz=r I hat tietlie sxtf �, t of avy 1 �0,m ge csuused id mitt r party t y t sitter by re or� of rmy brt aai kh Ot t4k co traeut uiay L,e cxtrtrncly d if quit to ter fnes, it i by the parties hereto ih,., za�� act oi� fc4 rr�mrges s aa ia�cieetuAte Xe"�t� �t � ch -and tIvnt SPectfic s n u, mitt ut prec"Vjcn any other rcrneciy a ai% ie in ► r t. law, in be neocessa b ' � ft��t ether �erty' hereto with, an a...�l tie. + for the t emch hereof. tt � - This Guntrz ---t rrt y t c er3 st y #fie rautuOl e e w;ment cif fire except in ofar as any i ropa$amen' is ate In. y .` ontr r toPI?i c � triat srrkees that in the e�c�i of �e�fiilyT e-0�:fur�z �s�te #icy: by cogniz "t 90 er;�rrrri i # a y, either prt�Ix_g a pro4pectIm change in. the Volume. of use of wfittr by contrnO60s customers, as by thii sm;xn#t or sUspen ?ifg r'icK rSerVice f, c k13) i`t'qL;i€ amg retie of wastewater � f _ � at. i i efi age of W.-wtew u.-r rote ,pan F'r4A*QO i� y. trK.Wal make st;; au. ,etu sat of itiu ertrts tNeare9r siy .�`- 4 I e All natim for wasier wrz:tic, in this ewntraig rvIl"Ide to be Ove'l or monde or sent. or whiNm m. ay #.c given or tte 01° $ t, bar Other pt�rty h�ra€t� :t�► the Other, $hall ts- deemed to have txea gully t,,� n or amide ter sent when a in pos-Ite-0 th the unitia'd States mad, ragLaered, ar rti�`fed, t tagO_ f�'�rp, and t z jajlo.vvs; TO District- Santp Mrs VaII4.'.y 'Wai-er DIS-rici San Jae, ("WIE' o :aju 9$11 t To Contractor.., a t r of cuperti:al 1.0300 Torre A, mas 1%4,.C� add reSS ts1nt mly riu."elit rwriting i�iAk iwn d r �#rt 'C upc; l i "s 1 2�0b, a A'� eO v uch p.`L, r abO provided. a�tzbil�l Ifg t 'rzte or more of :Rxaa =egwAw ru`agreements ut fprV7z.Jts - t 00ar ei on tFi� j t z' ]DIstriet iw r r ; r, s;a Ef ,fir uiryfbim�,/, at ePi f :.:. . p.l"I L1 }tip T �:'t�" Y :tO anNN �i��3Y1� ��. t �}� law w :��t dit' ! 't J � �i .�dt�t{�►:3is � ...�� tb birfci!'eab.Ie rn tiny i "; tom; fit" rImpotent W s a ':tic tion, -tom ���tt Cove i Vn �tk g i�, try }i (yepr tor y y i� rner�rpsy ttPts, s� ire Inu rnc� Vrsl�3ia-and y n{ i1 �iy p� ed. tg yy a a c '��'�,/'n. (he rE�m it#'3� co erm ii d agri. e" ,0��'�r bi35S,� si iid1.p rtq,ada,n .at txn In ties tFatr. 't r a t set �fr i nd� re no to cor►struilp-n as a part of Vnis contract or inwi+ way rt.i:€rg W.119MV. n Ch girt=, bons. hereof. Other Cuntrneu District saget,,essthat eac. i etaat€:°ash roo tt araqugy of trie"ded WAITU: in reaff;T -ent reed lmmo_b r',SQCI £ lth *my Other Coiltra,elmr A r«aka. ally PrOVMW 2€is 4 a ater� i llat `e 4 .€Y v' Other 'C)NIVIPAc`tor thau'eke awheaNk, the cont alb<wi. W11 /lit/ 1 fIC31;? ! t IN WIT.4ESS WV7FMOF, Mi-,,.rxt 'has eamed, lhix corilltmtt to bo exwUlled i�y Um- Clinfrintn Q1 its Rwird of Pirettors ando-al;7wel its Off!M�1, Sea] 0 be ham l Alc3 44r.G%,,P4 and contracto" has thr-Sc. Primc 4, to br;- exeeulAcd Ott 19 by its auIy gittl 100 Vzd officer. ATTRSTSUSAN A-EIMRAIINII) IV- -JCT SANT" CLAR VALLEY WATJ�lq R rAw. PA tw L TA, Of* OF DfKaft Rr - -nar allonm. 0 Air" fin.vf Qja eetors Appmed' as 'to f0m, I nut , 'lard W Valley aor Distbrict AT-VISTi CTTY OF ME ay /�m Ad Approved as to fur. as k 41 J14, Ai LL rflL�y for contracto., September 1975 .. '`A.,�,.•.:- ..e.<„_." ,� - �s�q ,�^ Y s �-e ,, . t ;�r t' t�.}� �. �t-i ry i- 3 Y-� eke « wP3A Aix R.J.:.ed-�Wi F e',�}.�l.�ii�T ,JrL /s�.y.D C0*N t'1 k%i.+� A17i) Fir b#�riy- 31:.#:.�,r dii"1. .f, ' TAY3, Azm p Qatcjx". r, pot-cy to- Pricing -ji.ic. .21 r a + ".y c x ,r. pn a c�a tb a.,ret..�I va r e C n Via; r i3#` b' aaYd c ?)}7�r �J?t-Gr �? yX 31"I rJ;7' ''d`.Y ':'C'I 4t ` t'bri"3Y;3^j e.? i:< to ,)'ie Dist:'r.: ct- z +.Ilg the �V �":.'•--.,�L''�a?E,.. _ a� �.. c... � .�.'b:3..e to I- f ptad O rr �,c, Id e r de i ' ca' _z Far"." . C.XC :_i �.`::at'..._ , s,` r a al Sti..rc e",i.n Ci �.S-i; •it t''.` .`"Try t - fl"> d control benefits ire*��z� In� .;ici) � e�ra -. nd.prav�. e: roc:rea hen fits- a a ...fis. nq tt� �+�J�. �y �/. y+{ µ �, pyc- . ':E^1� M1-- .T1 , �w coil �..l} f AX', iEY li•.�w� .I. d,ti j� i.+Fw'.ii :�_ �to 4i..I4 t"fwwww z of the pexq ojat-, On ponds also u o-,r �ae.z �a� ..�j���-e - ct v t _. �dt3X)Viae rqpreatjqnai 3 a t �tct.�z s tru y , z tweet bc-%;cz Lt'nS. s1.%i.,from QWa �br' ��**e?t ' t iei� to Owzta acts .. A. 3ac:rxcf its r.sn trout; x° x-rsxt � kzc �a uch _ e.r��., � Ott 3'3�-r t n e rt �_�, _ nt plants*'e4 _vt1 p r~?y xde va ilaxai j%#y f '- ter even . :c }, +e U0 fac, lities,hre, 4otr bet as _ In the �� .fit ruc A fae t .1 excess ���e�ty c�za� e� be � �+v� da-d ;tom rt� ure th �' fa ndL and a :Z: tawrct* belief it ru-S:11 tting xcaft tive gyrator ro - g am# _clasaly alxitp4. to* the gerleral eminomic. berne-l'it, iS the it x ,pry: uible t c) a6ccttakn tb"z� CQct:s associated with share of c:ot s allocated to �araci,. 1 rr z sa tr r from core rucLipr� �nc� � ���t���� �� tho s'-S rVQ E4nd to recreation associat;�,,d with they r.ese Vv ors", Aad the pets,.:Aation or"do can be ascertained through applicati s some a e t.; cost ro. :a cP!ac 'lie ovocumlitted. 6:vrardt ft ciaan be C.az l moat; :rpd. It b�� CC WIC-8 az 7 az1'L, €�w r to 6-i.�.0cato twC. en i at* S t i .. 'lie G' ��� ..4w�3� �s �.�s�Gt` bra LS'd 'G£� th .,� �3� �s�..� � b?` 'L3���. � � c��#� Clearly l�++ anj C':t�•iI if?0C-A`3U,ril. :r0 i'''o S)Ou �• �r� �ir8. i�'f�: to i f?i:^ A� Those b e ri e f c- it. a.rie,S ':«`h b rer—eiVr ;, yi,U;[.±pl u_ r:..i r r for cCTi a::.�3f }, tde 1] e' (us " J Xs3 E ' �.; i:.. a {' i i f3e? 1 E4 ,�. Yii S ? �" . c S i I �: re c'j C .1s3a` I t� 11s 2] .:` Ouul pav f Or i616 t: benefit a on 1I6 eels .� f froin 011 tger eat;rn,a-zt .c. ,th.- inif f_Z" 41.e ti! slir=,i.{ld be cn ,�3_— S c �.I. t_n_ L.-fit. W. s . U1eli~1 r I),ilk tIic,', b e ;xaf it: j. t z :` ='1 oc!at oi`7 of rC77 Ie; bl_a and Le eetcCni.ned in a,wcordarica w J.Q:� �<`ce�atcc� � a� :'.:ices a i r .s i rite s; :: �ctsr±,t i t'h ne 6<.i: r,,,e t�.ve 4:nY ICITx ppljxy.. hould eiubs dye this ;Eb c on �4 L Kai p0 :.Iraq. � CE �. -_ �, t 7- i-a-i te-d ext en t., +mt;,bod - d tree pre s.en.t, panic IV ley.. t7zadt.7l.a 'ice Cons.J.czer,� ape at ive '0f lt-s . �Ourep and cost. The wetter Icah,j :i 5 i 22 oF 1T{1o' ` v,11 % r .'�i :: r«' A.r ;/ Ci�t FR .. {3%L?S€ £ sue' 7t W i I;uutzlefit 6f.riar ervcr.: aIc: ..;- 'Ova, jto JLj our servati r 'Was$• r Wb1C.'h 'ice t tit hoc 9. t r P "rs c . A ge.dua t t � csrs � t�i� e.11pr r sex . r i t o + ._ "A�€q�g c s R w ,p�{c �Z- fn '+j �p:{w: swyd��.yp{Y� au _' G- Con, ration.. +n. . of j d'� - the gto�t1n 6Rf C; to l."�a4c"ain ��i Ich con s td �-: E,a iosp.V L.hi.i common �OW},.�.1 Shoup b re-ox e r r ncl , a e: l r c 4 : o a 01 ;a.ca,art hydro� ;icalzz. at=rad ��t.p then r tnd- w t• r as2in raceivi n.x runoff from sty ams in Naztl wt!.st„. lEtaz-t h: Central, . ttr�t� x�jci rziirk px.srsa:sn. Local. �':ossneraratar��t and �zt the Past, and will iii tis,-2 fut;:uz,,L-, aid it equalizing -the cosy ba is rP_,� rn �iL a t *muwat " f r .9intu all r'�vil$ t4a f.str kbu t{+. _6:. . >: ho commiwi f . 1. y t,ho qil]ilutyy C*MitrxF'.' Pipeline will 1.1 h b 3�4� t 19 7 . t ....cou d t+�.i%G r Is and y� n j i..S Fi M': F�yj l:l. �J,�l a� s}.�A. .{mil. f�.:..C";y � 7 M ^� `ie.r v - 5 C•1P.� G�i { . ia�'z + "myIM�ti3USI017' '� •; ML,f p �1�'r iit_$.Y �?y D0.Caria `cxrryIn t.s r �. iris, �:,_ , � .s jz Sf <. c! - i jam, �.. 1, f 5 t'" f'! ✓ J. •� 1. L~ r ' C {,, .i 4Gi t,., .�i �<'_. „ jr - r x tiiiG 3C31± VYC?� ; c = ind t i'C !_1 S <:,i:.: ti C C7' tCC-_7" Yi nt i ia!±^tlx;E � tbi fi t.er'rzq e i . the Un crq "Qk e 1;tr �.0 -FJ. x7si t $# t7t Z ��.'•i?C:Yl{ .th-0 rlat{T. cA'?2 7 i T 5^.l2-)iI fs-t'!C,?1L'll,ir7 �i .a;`kCiCr r'}!C 1II5+,' C+S'1is13dbe, [f�Xiiilln? t�`tL"isn1.S; v'.C3"Y-a.1.1 Wal- costs of facilif "L.1s.ft. C i Fv Lt � G9 ili 3 ' G c1:artic'cc 3 ti::.rt�ar� tfi€s a. 06 r jr } �1r€�i mid Con�� 4n,4 g_e 1t 3..r.-Iw0. :.- water q f r!'�.�Y�fFi�'i-.:�a.*"CiO..bY+y K'? - i lis St SL':,Ti 4t1. i rc_1'.7 r311 i the �aw."fs'3t rces tC'Zav )i e .. ?,. y't,, t yA a`six- F�ilc.'FkY`,. . ..kon6 yla g e,.l3ti 3t.). i}_;� ,f�}"t 2 .6 ;i3' �41A d3�3". Nl���k p �.. 4. v�.:I.,e1�'t .+f- Ll6)t2�.'%.i.+ 5r'+s•-FF',x.-K-.�e it ' rr�.��t� � 6 9 Fr'af Twi W . q �r^�p- p�$y��-y �y g�yy� ��x _.a6�p+5.tc.. y��,•� ytp �l� �` Y✓'� w'd�' �r tom: .Ai�A . \y.�F a�: �'}+� Y`(�y.Ft ,]. d+ T 'vf}'4:+..�yfwq i�g i�ty 5�:.a 9.{� 4rti�Tye Fs�gi4 rry�'Cry i C �.S Y y, yal�,-; tV to ,��Tlt h. vi iat \i' 1'Nd z � �Qv}i a}'• + r��igA kr?tt� . to tEf' %cdk� t4C1tFTdt C PEr n �2:'k: r toy, � o% L o �� allagepth .tit to .. �F}r�}nxp i =) y rates rt y}+� le -E?+ YiFs.°''a.3. • Y�y ,/�y�y* F �gj, Y y.yet;,(�3f�p'..--.;/.:tij received t� lin ��+4a F+w!- 4i 4'.� V ,PR % �F US-0 M+.i.. the -va c!r � i. xn s-Ni.YI� talc.' of, TM C r "l. . . ' F x tv . 4? 6� �.�� G: area. C � p till 4 0aAlp 1Y ' of tit'ji UIX z 0,akti:or z An 440 Oil UM 4v. •s..Rd� k.Xi ;'� 3.k..' .A �,'yyy�uy,+9e{.yg yam'. (��ya .�i•-p4 yµ �" g�Y �{{ s3VMt �riaA +H}'�tFy +# R &+-:..'9'6 .,'a:•3k�'"Sa',,,'g';.. OPCI Oc :. '. - aF'i '*H i '•�"e'A'F•.'d-�"Y lt' "" SAY r �ilX�'' '':,.cy�. } - o, U., .i eY,; Sit€'}` - ,1' .,A . 9F i `C3TI }a re nble ` ..: .y, i �. } ,5. 1, Aicot* 8 14je rlv;) 1.l21 Jr.. ✓ y EIt r the f . the HeL 0- t rsi-C �lb tC`"S5 Aquf'dja + L=rP.i a Ili n t a 3r y �.4�sJ.k � i 4� a, _3 � � 1 m n ►�f�_13th Pacheco.j L..xrn Al A.`(. 1. 7.Ci t for to .h 440 Alto ¢� h.IGM..CxL 4i.aaa#id.Yr"&{ A. }i e� Fwe Y i t."�/ys StL♦. i �.'(.L wk iya'� #� is i��.j u4i.gta{ k. clu . �+Cy t'(6F �Yq+ y yy�meY • '�i 5� .�.`. ebc: id.Ae %Tc. 's Y JwATO,. y�� $i-xp'mif�3d t.v..vx.P'� { 12 t t: r qu. dim+ # y. tk tuikCt ..` �i Ex:tould 1 u 5Ny13Ci,r3tcctt*f t'h bi*4c,° - 9s ka�Y�F�L'T:W����rf ��a••. � �q�,3.g i ��aZ��� F�3� we ; '�R +.I Y. +.i.ey -'' "�� ,�p�,Y,'k:,� R.t.'�'". z6�1;' I ' .7ai:� ,...y. y Ra` Ur'{'.\.4�24q" 3 .. {{ �( a county., I StiK+-x T«k��ik.1".%�s`.+s. .p.Y .. .. .. a. rr `z , cs'��`u�':t�. App .-• - .:: :- :'L� .vC :. !..:S 3r. i 3,. :' ` .;.'S;. _h'. t<'i 7:.��%. ii,7 "1Gy . �- - iy.w r�el4:' _, r C,; �.5. l+I��ib4A�.3� C4�f. _� C= a��EF����w :. (;-.. �,'Kt "a�:3 »l-.��{r: #_�� 3.. Rt9►'�aer�' ., - tt .r .. :. 3 1Tt.0 �?_'`.zS t ,...i d' �'. - i. ;x. 4�. e"S 7 .2,s"tt un" of Am F' to Jotji c6ruty—widw SO levy for. xwy '. S+0 w y w l._ P :'Y w to {; Y faF.+e-.SaU ).... ' !gal r ,`,'t:. �� �`�'#iFutx�a �,1.� � a-a6,%[ R �ui�iw'$ �'i l'.`.�. � � V_ •S*.s:,dd K: +.I♦ �:Ca j7 ,: '�,3:1.e'4 z-;i a +..�I.:.f%r r' ♦ 'Fr :� � as-tt! � ' d q aioi(Y C '.} S. yy ��tt+ WK{ � , c ... E.i .�. 1='L.k Li ,t-1.<6vR3 {, i {,. t wt"4 w lt. h. 7.! C. v'-t ad- i'LylY. �. i{.pi'?� ro. y' �:: 1 s S4 k' :ice'. fit✓ ', vr.s-. '✓v " S ..i } ie L t{.F.� one - - !,tin _ - .n s .�r� g t t b'� 5F*.A:. k : _ e. St d .ii.q. t wa ri,— c :08tpit- A to �t t,� tetu a' in y 7.' '� ale an tr:#.:�71 i +.kg� - -' s ,� F. . -Y 1 ta�s 'cj}.ti. ' � •; { 'i.,rd,•h ..00 Wi ' .,¢a Y T ♦#y�� . -s`�it ni . -`1 i s emit Y MAW tv, the ktii�� rr e e t, a Sa lctc JU- _t �! yyn� �yy-B� q yA�Yy'r� ' "AlYy'�- } .y y� l� the d S:i�i Tli� L ! � ���� �� LyF{t. g.rea �a^+N�.fy�9y;x .,�iW4•s7. Z --pa -?.:b.tiiiXd tl.wi.. b .�tggi"��,,t� } yttt 31. i-t i}{i +4d'`u, e',.7 a t" i i,:�3V i%'� Y � .� � � c eA a� ei'os P1 `s'g —j Q� 6 � g�� y u d y -. 4✓, ^'iM1.'b.:'in`T'i Cat/g'.m'.R. .Y'Re l OM OWrX OO tq 1i,: �' 7Y��f� L�:•jtF3a+ 5:.59`Xf��A�l`�.�p?:3. ,k p Y yk pX �.,,ppyY Lai'�Z=}W.t�-A'/}��� � C+e�'y'v��3YFr ) 4�y�: + t�q - gM'ly).d4Li$�4p-.^::. - M��..S�6r y:i ' :2' #+ �.y�•�y.��}�a�j yc n ,j +j,� y� ,qt- y z��tq y,� �+y •:i}' 'O.i. J�yd _.tlY' if, 1 5- i0 .s� ,y R 9 �a i �+Rn �^ 2�,g� ��p yy1 pT its. SiF' c,. xyi:�MfJ {4X#M 7r C'.i�% a !NFJi.'i kip- �t..��4z rvIO Y 40''I..a. %� .-�i.. ei'•ir.<�S ii��i Y!'1}3' RR.�I�:�R: o } s fle f WA1:c- ,. xc3' � # z tc. f° i s ic. re! r tltic! tj '.L'er.4i�tmr--nt oa t.<T ti; a.# vQ " t� c L = # t ct; X j.t1 V tEt` gig0.�,k vi-c- +�F ev 0`� lc t c d# 4":0 Win an" pxn d a � It �iC� � ���k 4�r ifi ty� ii� je. x': 4 x^ w : 3?` XSW�iE ha0fi;'Ei�- i 4. Th 0S: 0n rti "�.. 'S.i�'p3� t F' Jet>F';*.r.- S. .bv E" -.Sit_ .i` t i i •+., i { .'� �.i .s 'r' ' aS�+�S_sr'i <' t T i; . Os ta k {-` Levy. .4? "Lro-It' io3��`11.:. Tr T E• _:.3 3'@+i":w35.:_ CCT`f{1i4 E�. iti`r C3 - _ by th'`, T„ h3 [•.',.ti'ti' �.",'� .a ,..''i f c:��C3j.i � i�l i �' .� ^s ��t�s'fC'�'1'�'�3� d'ti,-:.• t�� r .,,'�;,, ^-�.� - to: 00VF"a.. �t�..-}+...s �, �. ii,=vm Li ty,.33 if.r YC 6 r J a y� ii yyrr j � �,{ �.y �y l y. i'.'1 ,? t sY.. 'S+ .g. sjI .0 .. . ^b;en L�:� 3 L ?._Ll F) '[ i `i ti ? lixC ka T D-C' �1L i" Rd, .. f - lA'g tivgope< . . -vat. wadox. cl .egos 4"e Onaq- e—r ivo from -tare er 6tom. i4a ar 10 � ���v���.a i ce would4��; 9�x��- �.�.vd withinwithint� :���� v�r �L .: _ i llfs;trict Dholl "t bo, DOmp for failure u smouas jwlv*mpt�ove provievad Itso .1 far -i 9mll be "I by droda�'It Nq d the remscmatWevorlrol 0 f T,) Ot. ax i'll: ad-vw- 00 as pw of 4 6 an 'j: cv *4tur Alt may g n' ft-,ft If I *j d _Ws (it mated 'jN.bW-.ATFII CHARGE 'fre o '10 t-hr- 0 -- 03-t. dug Or.,rfis lin tlaf& forty Uvoughl") lhtc*rHm! t' trom: Wwn' t; 0 Act) Hic ..... ..... jjk nwt vi 'Wa or, tit -b R xi c, of Via M RIM mrs I. A- otume of tl*, wat ce aFeAgAt A., MY 1W-ed to ei ma c.4 e- Pi v w 4 -.0w, fig ta�*3i t. May c el y by the ol , c u I 4 S-cti op, for d"I'm ag-'u- IS rkn Um-11"o-i -3 rig 4n. the its --aw, WTI, ->�'sdr- - lo turn-ish -4m, -red ;vi'p iherp ty �qth . 4,q Oqu y ARTICIA 0. OIWERAL FR(OVISIONS -by y- be,;me tiled At 4Av thn.&, A Ta, 114M 016 CQ.lrtvRvt:uxa Stu r m .;�O�.Oxceptjhgofpr as arse prepas*dt 1 Mel), MIN -Its or#, In dilvik ug. �emvp cmwtv ry to Appueable It- ")Ntrio 016 It lof togoyl Oot? MIT 1, tfczzy A du- j. volum-bof-use fit' w, lej'by'c!' 'b wil of an order sill d r v- -or � y : I ot wIMl.-Flee Apei-;ut*nOns* nor. tW 000�.vdPewiw:O, VI'm afrwd"sl) n tx.- eonstrueml FIve—vint rng-. -Iboh—trwo-i or or Djs�rllptl I Iati t y f. cat . k r ue I q, o r Ap w-j' ftig c au,;. of rah law of Waiver ofILObi - Aby -wal"VOP at 6V Alh AllY ilrm L m 0 y here of Othor -u -e isp -i-all this 4X con 0*000011 1 dazamet l4uq I )tbe ryl ed.W NTaW t! Ywb r c pe-ewany ailler 0daultor f�40:M.e Of t tYt!- 6,QV the Written %tcalf"'t<'%at or the w"Tivin ft" ty 10 I tl C 3 12