Reso 2753 RESOLUTION NO. 2753
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REVISED USE PERMIT TO
(MANGE THE USE OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUILDING WHICH IS
PART OF A THREE-BUILDING PIECED-USE COMPLEX TO INCLUDE
ill A RESTAURANT OF APPROXIMATELY 1,900 SQUARE MEET WITH
OUTDOOR DINING SPACE AND A TWO-BEDROOM APARTMENT.
Application No(s) . 13-U-85 (revised)
Applicant: Terry Brown/James Hemphill
Property Owner Terry Brown/James Hemphill
Location: Northwest corner of Pasadena Avenue and Granada
Avenue
Parcel Area (Acres) : .48
FINDINGS AND SUBCCNC'Tt1SIONS:
Approval is subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and the
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission
meeting of January 13, 1986.
CONDITIONS:
1-15 STANDARD CONDITIONS
Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does
exist, the special conditions as enumerat 1. herein shall apply.
411 16. APPROVED EXHIBITS
That the recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A 1st
Revision, B and B-1 of Application 13-U-85 Revised except as may be
amended by special conditions enumerated herein.
17. MODIFICATION OF THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall
desire to make minor e alteration or
any Chang amendment in the
approved development plan or building permit, a written request and
revised development plan or building permit shall be submitt- d to the
Director of Planning and Development. If the Director makes a finding
that the changes are minor and do not affect the general appearance of
the area or the interests of owners of property within or adjoining
the development area, the Director may certify the change on the
revised plan. If such approval is witheld, the applicant may appeal
to the Planning Commission. If the dhanges are material, the Director
shall submit said changes to the Planning Commission for approval. If
the change is denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may
appeal to the City Council as provided in Ordinance 652 of the City of
Cupertino. If the change is approved, an appeal my be made by an
interested party. Further, any member of the City Council may request
a hearing before the City Council, said request to be made within ten
(10) days fLum the date of approval - when the change has been
• approved by the Planning Commission.
- 2 -
•5adai oxbuTO 3o .A.e4SnTo P
buTgpzodz00UT buTdPOSpUPT LPTM peoPTdaz pup pagPuTuITTe eq TTPLIP anuaAV
uuepPsed mr ; a.Ts aqg og ezupaqua aq . 3o ATaatpgnos eopds brTxu4.ud
gsaT3 aqs •sauTTepTn€ ubTsar p4sTA p4u0141 atp.} q.3TM guagsTsuoo sedA;
aaaq gaaags pup saxnxxT3 ggbTT gaazgs apTAoad TTPIi's qupoTTddP aqs
SdJL SSZi.L LI E S QNY adna T. mJlrl 'i'Z
•S O OMg oquT STaoapd buTgsTxa abeam Treqs queoTTddP atiy
SI'd S,L'dQI'IOSNco '£Z
•SaoupuTpzO 'C.TO tp.TM aouppiOooP uT sgTmaad uoTgTTourap
peaTnbaz TTP uTP4c1Q 04 A4TTT0qTsuodsaz au; a1IfssP TTPgs guPOTTddP aqI
INEWBEI.00ad NOI,LIrlowal 'Z Z
•abpgs gTuuad buTpTTnq egg
ge TPAozddp pup MaTnaa 33P4s Og goaLgns eg TTPLIS bUTdpospuPT a4Ts-u0
M IAad SdVDSQNV I 'T Z
'8LL eoupuTpzO 410
gtTM SOUPpz000P UT TTATAans aTagg aansUa Oq Saanspam b'TTTpgap pup
saazq eta. uOdn A.TATgoP uOTgonzgsuoo go goagge 94'4 buTuTTlno goagTgoay
eddospuPI p maag uoTgpnTPAe UP epnTouT TTPgs uPTd aql, .saTqTATqop
uoT4onagsuoo go uoTgpanp etpq ao; eeaq Lippe go aagauT.zad euTTdTzp
etpq buoTJ paTTPgsuT aq oq saoTAap uoTgoagezd go uoTgoTdap oTgdpab
epnTour TTs uPTd pTPS •A4aadoad goeCgns egg uo seaaq uaurppeds
buTgsTxe alp Jo uoTgPnaasazd aog uPTd P epTnazd TTPtS 4USoTTdde eq,Z
NoTTnaladd aabil '0Z
•guawaaabp
aPTTmTs P LIT agPdToTgaPd oq pagpbTTgo aap (s)aaurlo Agaadaad pTps
uegt gsez eqg og (s)eau o Agaadoad buTuTo Cpp aqg 1.14TM quamas e SS Dup
TPoozdTpea p UT agPdTpTgIPd oq quamaaabp up ubTs TTPuS gUPOTTddP eqs
siNaw3SKS SSS2IDS/SSS23DNI ait1Lal '6T
•anuaAv pueppsPd
pup enuaAy pppuPaj 'papnaTnog xaaao suaAe s Aq paaapaoq saTgzadazd TTP
og ssaabe/ssaabuT go SggbTa spuagxe govgm puP 'euTT Agaadoad ggaou eqg
buoTP ApMaATap quTo C au; ao; ggzou aqq. og Agzadoad buTuto CpP atpq tpTM
sguaauasPe ssaaba/ssaabuT TPooadToaz oquT saaque tpoTgM Aauzoggy 'TO
eqg Aq TenozddP pup MaTnaz og goeCgns pup' eqq -t TM buruuru quwueAOo
pup uOTgoTagsaa peep egpTadolddp uP pzo0ea TTPgs qU OTTddP atiy
SIMMAIIHEDY INawasu SS 2/SSS2ioN1 '8T
- £ - ebpd
(PesT l) S8-11.-ET (PesT/e ) NoILrnosai
RESOLUTION (Revised) 13-U-85 (Revised)
Page - 4 -
IIP 25. PROPERTY USE CONSTRAINTS
The approval is granted to redevelop the existing site to a three -
building complex totaling 6,670 square feet, more or less, consisting
of 1,180 sq. ft. of Office space, 1,427 sq. ft. of Commercial space in
use as a Real Estate center, 1,873 sq. ft. of Commercial space
(including approx. 630 sq. ft. of existing basement space) in use as a
full-service restaurant with an additional 475 sq. ft. of exterior
dining deck area, and three (3) apartment units encompassing 2,190 sq.
ft. All new uses or changes in use from those enumerated in this
Condition shall require use permit review as determined by the
Director of Planning and Development.
26. RESTAURANT USE CONSTRAINTS
The restaurant approved under Condition 25 above shall be subject to
operation under the following constraints:
a) Hours of operation: 6:30 AM to 11:00 PM daily
b) Maximum employees per shift: Four (4)
c) Total mmaximmn seating capacity: 38 inside; 14 outside
d) Liquor sales: Beer and Wine with meal service only; no take-out
liquor service or separate bar shall be offered. (Subject to
obtaining all appropriate licenses)
• 27. Silh PLAN MODIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED RESTAURANT USE
If an exterior service yard is provided, said facility shall be
subject to ASAC review at the building permit stage to ensure that the
orientation and design thereof minimizes its visibility to adjoining
sites and to outdoor living areas of on-site residential units.
28. PARKING
The two parking spaces adjacent to Building I shall be covered and
designed specifically for use by the studio apartment units.
S
RESOLUTION (Revised) 13-U-85 (Revised)
Page - 5 -
ilr
PASSED AND ADOPi1,1) this 13th dayof January, 1986, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by
the following roll-call vote:
AYES: CSSIONERS: Mackenzie, Adams, Szabo, Sorensen, Chairman Claudy
NAYS: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: CCSSIONERS: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
-__ /s / Robert Cowan /s / John Claudy
Robert Cowan John Claudy, Chairman
Planning Director Planning Commission
•
•