Loading...
CC 03-04-2025 Item No. 9 Amendments to the City Council Procedure Manual_Written CommunicationsCC 03-04-2025 Item No. 9 Councilmember Mohan's comments for Amendments to Cupertino City Council Procedures Manual Written Communications From:Sheila Mohan To:Lauren Sapudar; Kirsten Squarcia; Christopher Jensen Cc:City Clerk Subject:Re: Mohan"s Comments - Council Policies and Procedures Date:Wednesday, February 12, 2025 4:06:11 PM Attachments:image009.png image010.png image011.png image012.png image013.png image014.png image015.png image016.png image017.png image018.png image019.png image020.png image021.png image022.png image023.png image024.png image025.png image026.png image027.png image028.png image029.png image030.png image031.png image032.png image033.png image034.png image035.png image036.png image037.png image038.png image039.png image040.png image041.png image042.png image043.png image044.png image045.png image046.png image047.png image048.png image049.png image050.png imag51.png image052.png Mohan's Comments - Council Procedures.pdf VIII.Reports to City Council or Commissions Mohan's comments: This should be done as part of the Councilmember Reports. Expense reporting not required here. Councilmember Reports now include events attended by Councilmembers in their official capacity. L1  Remove, : No good reason to include these Mohan's comments: The reason this (4.4) is included is to avoid the revolving door practice among current officials and to encourage new participants. L2: Replace: Commission Removal by Council Approval Mohan's Comments: There are objective standards for commissioners - attendance, Form 700, etc. It is more efficient when City Clerk removes commission members when these objective standards are not met. There is nothing discretionary or subjective in the City Clerk's decision. L5: CM Provides Options (ICMA suggestion) Mohan's Comments: City Manager's performance criteria should not be part of Council Procedures Manual L6: Assume Suggestion, rather than instruction Mohan's Comments: I disagree. There is no need for this Add. We should all be able to tell the difference between a suggestion and an instruction. L7: Replace: Council may file PRA Request Mohan's Comments: I disagree that a Councilmember can file a PRA request. PR Requests have spiraled out of control - 333 requests in 2024! PRA's have the intended and/or unintended consequence of bringing City operations to a halt because of the time and huge effort involved in complying with the 10-day response period that the State requires. L11: Add 7.7: Written Communication Mohan's Comments: Non-agenda communications should not be part of the agenda. Minutes reflect oral communications which include non-agenda comments from prior council meeting. L12: Add: When......regular council meeting Mohan's comments: Start time of Council meeting should be at the discretion of the mayor and city manager. L14: Replace: Anyone can pull items. Mohan's Comments: Disagree. Efficient management of agenda will be adversely impacted. L17: Replace: Encourage meaningful discussion Mohan's Comments: This is unnecessary. Procedure exists now. L18: Add: Access to Closed session materials Mohan's Comments: Need clarification. Revision to Council Procedures Manual 2025-02-03 CONFIRM: “CM shall keep Council informed of the City response” 5.4 Responses to Public. It will be the responsibility of the City Manager to ensure a response is provided to public correspondence for informational requests addressed to the Council. Staff shall respond to all requests for services as appropriate, and the City Manager shall keep Council informed of the City response.[LC1] [LC1] It seems the responses to residents have not been forwarded to Councilmembers in practice. I seem to have to request that the city’s response is forwarded to me. CONFIRM: CM shall place requests on Agenda 6.6 Councilmember Access to Information. ….it more appropriately be assigned to staff through the collective direction of the City Council, based on the guidelines set forth in Cupertino Municipal Code section 2.17.043. The City Manager shall place requests that impose a significant workload on staff on the Council agenda for review by the full Council, along with a statement from that Councilmember as to why the information is needed.