CC 07-15-2025 Item No. 13 Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study_Written CommunicationsCC 07-15-2025
Item No. 13
Stevens Creek Corridor
Vision Study
Written Communications
From:Richard Lowenthal
To:City Council
Cc:City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject:Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study
Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 10:17:51 PM
Mayor Chao and the Cupertino City Council,
Please vote to accept the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study. we're hoping that you’ll join the cities of San Jose,
Santa Clara, Santa Clara County, and VTA to ensure a cohesive future for this very, very important boulevard in
Cupertino. Most of us use Stevens Creek Boulevard every day, and many times because of traffic congestion, we
take it to Santa Clara and San Jose, and indeed all the way west to Foothill Boulevard.
It is particularly important for us to adopt the vision all the way up the Heidelberg Quarry, or at least to Foothill
Boulevard. Our family uses that segment frequently when the 85/280 transition ramps are all plugged up with
traffic. In addition we are concerned about the health and future of the bridge that carries Stevens Creek Boulevard
over the creek itself. That bridge is 47 years old and is wearing out and frankly a pedestrian and bike underpass
under that bridge when the bridge is ultimately replaced would be spectacular. Since that bridge is considered a
County route, Cupertino’s chances of getting funding assistance for it from the County and VTA will increase if we
all join in a vision that includes the area by Blackberry Farm.
Thank you for taking residents thoughts into consideration.
Richard Lowenthal
42 year resident of Cupertino
From:Ishan Khosla
To:City Council
Cc:City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject:Please Accept Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study - Include in Public Record
Date:Monday, July 14, 2025 10:30:22 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members,
My name is Ishan Khosla, and I am a student at Cupertino High School who relies on biking
to get to school and around town every day.
Stevens Creek is a major corridor in our city, and its safety and accessibility for all citizens,
regardless of transportation method, is of utmost importance. Right now, it often feels quite
unsafe and disconnected if you are not in a car. This is why we must accept the Stevens Creek
Corridor Vision Study to make this road safer, more efficient, and better for all of our citizens,
including students and families. It's a collaborative effort involving San Jose, Santa Clara, the
County, and the VTA, so Cupertino should stay involved as well.
Plus, accepting the study does not commit Cupertino to implementing any projects, but
ensures that we have a seat at the table as planning moves forward. It will also place us in an
advantageous position to receive county and state-level funding.
Thank you for your leadership and for considering the voices of students and citizens. Please
include this email in the public record.
Sincerely, Ishan Khosla
From:Aahaan Jain
To:Public Comments
Subject:Public Comment 7/15 - Item 13 - Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study
Date:Saturday, July 12, 2025 8:36:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is Aahaan Jain and I'm a former Cupertino resident who used to (and still do)
live close to Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is our city’s most important corridor for jobs, housing, and
transportation, but the current design of the corridor isn’t up to the task. Its current
design encourages speeding, putting everyone at risk, especially those of us who are
unable to drive like children, seniors, or mobility device users.
The current design is also deeply unsustainable, both environmentally and financially.
With the state forcing us to plan for more development along Stevens Creek, we must
ensure the transportation options along the corridor can mitigate the traffic impacts of
new projects for a less congested and more livable future.
The Stevens Creek Vision Study’s Recommended Plan includes proven measures to
improve safety and reduce traffic, and respects the independence of our city by not
forcing any projects that Cupertino residents object to. It was approved
UNANIMOUSLY by the Planning Commission and the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Commission. By accepting the study, the city will be reaffirming our commitment to
safe streets and strong regional partnerships without binding the city to any new
financial obligations.
Please vote to accept the study so we can all enjoy the safe and sustainable Stevens
Creek Boulevard that we deserve.
Sincerely,
Aahaan Jain
From:Doron Dru
To:Public Comments
Subject:Public Comment 7/15 - Item 13 - Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study
Date:Friday, July 11, 2025 12:41:42 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is Doron Drusinsky and I’m a Cupertino resident at 11425 Charsan Lane.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is our city’s most important corridor for jobs, housing, and
transportation, but the current design of the corridor isn’t up to the task. Its current design
encourages speeding, putting everyone at risk, especially those of us who are unable to drive like
children, seniors, or mobility device users.
The current design is also deeply unsustainable, both environmentally and financially. With the
state forcing us to plan for more development along Stevens Creek, we must ensure the
transportation options along the corridor can mitigate the traffic impacts of new projects for a less
congested and more livable future.
The Stevens Creek Vision Study’s Recommended Plan includes proven measures to improve
safety and reduce traffic, and respects the independence of our city by not forcing any projects
that Cupertino residents object to. It was approved UNANIMOUSLY by the Planning Commission
and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission. By accepting the study, the city will be reaffirming
our commitment to safe streets and strong regional partnerships without binding the city to any
new financial obligations.
Please vote to accept the study so we can all enjoy the safe and sustainable Stevens Creek
Boulevard that we deserve.
ALSO: there is no reason Cupertino cannot look like Amsterdam or Copenhagen, with not only
FULLY SEPARATED and SAFE bike lanes everywhere, but also separated walking trails that are
not adjacent to vehicle exhaust fumes.
Sincerely,
Doron Drusinsky
From:Braeden Webb
To:Public Comments
Subject:Public Comment 7/15 - Item 13 - Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study
Date:Saturday, July 12, 2025 9:12:00 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is Braeden Webb and I’m a Cupertino commuter.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is our city’s most important corridor for jobs, housing, and
transportation, but the current design of the corridor isn’t up to the task. Its current
design encourages speeding, putting everyone at risk, especially those of us who are
unable to drive like children, seniors, or mobility device users.
The current design is also deeply unsustainable, both environmentally and financially.
With the state forcing us to plan for more development along Stevens Creek, we must
ensure the transportation options along the corridor can mitigate the traffic impacts of
new projects for a less congested and more livable future.
The Stevens Creek Vision Study’s Recommended Plan includes proven measures to
improve safety, reduce traffic, and respect the independence of our city by not forcing
any projects that Cupertino residents object to. It was approved UNANIMOUSLY by the
Planning Commission and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission. By accepting the
study, the city will be reaffirming our commitment to safe streets and strong regional
partnerships without binding the city to any new financial obligations.
Please vote to accept the study so we can all enjoy the safe and sustainable Stevens
Creek Boulevard that we deserve.
Sincerely,
Braeden Webb
From:Maddon Nicholas Hoh-Choi
To:Public Comments
Subject:Public Comment 7/15 – Item 13 – Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study
Date:Saturday, July 12, 2025 10:34:43 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is Maddon, a former Cupertino student.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is a vital corridor for our city, but is largely unsafe for
bikers, pedestrians, and people relying on transit. Speeding traffic puts children, seniors, and
people using mobility devices at risk every day.
The Stevens Creek Vision Study recommends proven improvements—like protected bike
lanes, safer crosswalks, and pedestrian islands—that will make the corridor safer for everyone
without harming traffic flow.
Adopting the study does not commit the city to any projects or spending. It simply opens the
door to future grants and regional partnerships that will help Cupertino plan for growth
responsibly.
Both the Planning Commission and the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission unanimously
recommended adopting the study. Please vote to accept it and move Cupertino toward a safer
future, especially as the city adds more residents and businesses to the corridor.
Thank you,
--
Maddon Hoh-Choi (He/Him)
University of California, Berkeley | Class of 2027
Haas School of Business
From:Alvin Yang
To:Public Comments
Subject:Public comment for 7/15 Item 13 (Stevens Creek Corridor Study)
Date:Friday, July 11, 2025 8:16:09 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
I'm writing today as a 25+ year resident of Cupertino to urge you strongly to approve the
Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study plan. I've seen Cupertino and the surrounding cities
grow in my lifetime and they have outgrown the current design of Stevens Creek. There are
simply too many points of interest on Stevens Creek to only prioritize car traffic. Between
Downtown San Jose, SJSU, Valley Fair, Santana Row, Main Street, De Anza College, and the
soon-to-be-completed Vallco project we simply cannot keep the design as is. The other cities
and agencies of this study (San Jose, Santa Clara city + county, and the VTA) have all already
come to this conclusion and are on board to adopt the plan. Cupertino should not continue to
drag its feet at this critical juncture.
As it stands now, if you ever travel on Stevens Creek during peak hours you'll find the road
full of traffic and congestion. This is especially apparent at Valley Fair/Santa Row. By
adopting this plan we can alleviate the congestion on Stevens Creek as alternative options such
as public transportation will become way more enticing. This will also benefit the Cupertino
side of Stevens Creek as Main Street is also a highly desirable location. You may think that
since there is already existing bus infrastructure that we do not need to improve it but I would
argue that the current bus infrastructure isn't good enough to be a viable alternative for the
average citizen. I personally took bus 23 from Cupertino to SJSU when I went to college. I
found the bus would get stuck in traffic during rush hour adding an extra 10-20 minutes to my
commute. Furthermore the bus route itself took so long that the overall travel time on just the
bus alone was nearly an hour. This was partially alleviated when VTA started rolling out
limited stop bus routes but the bus would always get stuck in traffic and stop constantly at all
the red lights. One of the short term plans for the Vision Study is to give signal and lane
priority to existing buses. This alone would greatly increase the speed of the bus and make it a
viable alternative to driving. The plan document estimates a 50% reduction in corridor travel
time which is insanely good return on investment. If you've ever been stuck queuing for
parking at Santa Row you can easily see how the bus becomes a very enticing option.
I recognize that the budget has been on the City Council's mind since the loss of Apple online
sales tax revenue. I would posit to you that implementing this plan is an investment in the
future of the city. If Cupertino chooses to adopt the plan you will find that businesses on
Stevens Creek will have an increase of customers as it will be easier and more convenient for
more people to reach these places. This in turn will boost revenue for the city. It is imperative
that the city council acts now while we both still have the capital and have this incredible
opportunity. It is very rare to have all these citys and agencies in agreement for such a project.
Passing it up now would be detrimental to any future collaboration on not just Stevens Creek
but any other future projects.
In the past Cupertino has led the way on Stevens Creek improvements but by dragging your
feet with this study we are at risk of being left behind. I ask that Cupertino take charge once
more and approve the Stevens Creek Plan for the future benefit of its citizens and of the South
Bay Area.
Regards,
Alvin
From:Cate Crockett
To:City Clerk; City Council
Subject:Stevens Creek Blvd
Date:Saturday, July 12, 2025 1:50:21 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is Cate Crockett and I’m a 30 year resident and Cupertino home owner.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is our city’s most important corridor for jobs, housing, and
transportation, but the current design of the corridor isn’t up to the task. Its current
design encourages speeding, putting everyone at risk, especially those of us who
are unable to drive like children, seniors, or mobility device users.
The current design is also deeply unsustainable, both environmentally and
financially. With the state forcing us to plan for more development along Stevens
Creek, we must ensure the transportation options along the corridor can mitigate the
traffic impacts of new projects for a less congested and more livable future.
The Stevens Creek Vision Study’s Recommended Plan includes proven measures
to improve safety and reduce traffic, and respects the independence of our city by
not forcing any projects that Cupertino residents object to. It was approved
UNANIMOUSLY by the Planning Commission and the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Commission. By accepting the study, the city will be reaffirming our commitment to
safe streets and strong regional partnerships without binding the city to any new
financial obligations.
Please vote to accept the study so we can all enjoy the safe and sustainable
Stevens Creek Boulevard that we deserve.
Sincerely,
Cate Crockett
From:Joe
To:Public Comments
Subject:Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study
Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 2:22:07 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
UBJECT: Public Comment 7/15 - Item 13 - Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision
Study
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is and I’m a San Jose resident & Commuter who uses the San Jose
Cupertino corridor.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is our city’s most important corridor for jobs, housing, and
transportation, but the current design of the corridor isn’t up to the task. Its current
design encourages speeding, putting everyone at risk, especially those of us who are
unable to drive like children, seniors, or mobility device users.
The current design is also deeply unsustainable, both environmentally and financially.
With the state forcing us to plan for more development along Stevens Creek, we must
ensure the transportation options along the corridor can mitigate the traffic impacts of
new projects for a less congested and more liveable future.
The Stevens Creek Vision Study’s Recommended Plan includes proven measures to
improve safety and reduce traffic, and respects the independence of our city by not
forcing any projects that Cupertino residents object to. It was approved
UNANIMOUSLY by the Planning Commission and the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Commission. By accepting the study, the city will be reaffirming our commitment to
safe streets and strong regional partnerships without binding the city to any new
financial obligations.
Please vote to accept the study so we can all enjoy the safe and sustainable Stevens
Creek Boulevard that we deserve.
Sincerely,
Joe Neil
CTO
Phonix.io
From:Carol Stanek
To:City Council
Cc:City Clerk
Subject:Support for the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study
Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 12:52:39 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor, Vice Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I am writing today to voice full support of the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study and urge you
to accept the Vision Study. Cupertino needs to look to the future and actively pursue improved transportation
routes.
I strongly disagree with the Planning Commission's recommendation to limit
the study to Bubb Road.
This is short sighted and dangerous.
Anyone who travels between Bubb Road and Foothill knows that this section is routinely used as a popular shortcut
by motorists to avoid the Hwy 85 to 280 interchange. This is particularly problematic on weekdays in the mornings
and afternoons, the same time as parents are taking their children to and from Stevens Creek Elementary
School. This is the only route to take children to school! There are times when it is impossible to turn onto Stevens
Creek toward Foothill from the surrounding neighborhoods.
In addition, the pedestrian crossing at the entrance to the Blue Pheasant and Blackberry Farm golf course is another
place that is rife with safety issues. Motorists routinely speed down the hill, so much so that Sheriff officers often
position themselves here to catch speeders. This should all be included in the Vision Study.
To suggest that the study be limited short of this section is foolish and dangerous. We already know the issues. The
Vision study will provide additional data to guide us in our decision making. The other jurisdictions and agencies
have agreed that the corridor should be studied to the end. Why wouldn't we want the data too?
Let's get to work to study the corridor all the way through to Foothill!
Sincerely,
Carol Stanek
Speaking for myself
Note: Please include my comments in the public record.
From:Jian He
To:City Council
Cc:City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject:Urging Acceptance of the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study
Date:Monday, July 14, 2025 12:08:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Members of Cupertino City Council,
As a resident of Cupertino for more than 20 years, with my family living near Stevens Creek
Boulevard and my husband relying on his bike for his daily commute, I am writing to strongly
urge your immediate acceptance of the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study. This critical
initiative represents a collaborative effort between the cities of Cupertino, Santa Clara, and
San Jose, along with the County of Santa Clara and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority (VTA), all united in the goal of comprehensively improving Stevens Creek
Boulevard. The future of this corridor directly impacts my family and many others in our
community, making your decision on this matter incredibly important.
Cupertino has already demonstrated its commitment to this vital project. In July 2019, our City
Council adopted a resolution specifically affirming Cupertino's support. This vision study is
the culmination of extensive multi-year input from various stakeholders, including the broader
public, a dedicated Steering Committee composed of elected leaders from all three cities, and
a Community Advisory Group of respected community leaders. Such a thorough and inclusive
process ensures that the recommendations reflect the diverse needs and aspirations of our
shared community.
It is imperative to note that the City Councils of San Jose and Santa Clara, the County, and the
VTA have already voted to accept the results of the Vision Study. Cupertino currently stands
as the only major participant that has yet to formally accept these results. This is crucial
because accepting the study keeps the City of Cupertino actively engaged with Santa Clara,
San Jose, the County, and VTA in deciding the future of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Now,
Cupertino must do so as well to maintain its vital role in this collaborative effort.
It's important to emphasize that the Vision Study does not mandate any specific changes or
projects. Instead, it serves as a foundational document, laying out a comprehensive vision for
the corridor's future. Any specific projects that emerge from this vision will require separate
and individual approval processes, ensuring that Cupertino retains full control over local
implementation.
Furthermore, unanimous acceptance of the study by all participating cities, the County, and
VTA will significantly elevate the priority of specific projects for state and county grant
funding. This will directly benefit Cupertino by increasing our chances of securing the
necessary resources to realize these improvements.
Finally, I must strongly advocate that the corridor vision study encompass all of Stevens Creek
Boulevard, extending all the way to Foothill Boulevard, and not terminate at Bubb Road as
recommended by the Planning Commission. All other participating cities, the County, and the
VTA recognize the paramount importance of improving this vital corridor from end to end. An
inclusive approach ensures a cohesive and effective strategy for the entire length of Stevens
Creek Boulevard, benefiting all residents and commuters.
By accepting the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study, the Cupertino City Council will
reaffirm its commitment to inter-agency cooperation, demonstrate its dedication to thoughtful
urban planning, and unlock significant opportunities for future funding and improvement
within our city.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this urgent matter.
Sincerely,
Jian He, Cupertino Resident
Many blessings to you all,
"...all things work together for good..." --- Romans 8:28
From:Winnifred Homer-Smith
To:City Council
Cc:City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject:Vision Study for Stevens Creek Corridor
Date:Saturday, July 12, 2025 7:47:29 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Cupertino City Council Members,
I am writing to express my support and enthusiasm for the Vision Study for the Stevens
Creek Corridor. It is very valuable to give all the cities involved this opportunity to make
significant improvements in this ever-so-important corridor that we all use so frequently. It is
also very important that it include the entire length of the corridor, as was recommended by
the team that produced the Vision.
It is my understanding that all the other cities involved have already approved it. It was
brought into existence after many years of preparations participated in by many different
interest groups. If unanimously approved, it will most likely bring important grant funding.
While it does not specify projects, it clearly opens an opportunity to bring this vital corridor
into the present, and to prepare it well for our future.
I certainly hope we - our city - will continue to support this project to continue all that has
been achieved already.
Sincerely,
Winnifred Homer-Smith
23300 Via Esplendor, V58
Cupertino, 95014
From:Neil Park-McClintick
To:Public Comments; City Council
Cc:City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject:Yes on Item 13—Public Comment
Date:Monday, July 14, 2025 1:58:37 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
My name is Neil Park-McClintick and I lived in Cupertino for over 15 years, and my family is still
lives there. I also do not own a car and rely on VTA and my bicycle to go to work, get groceries,
receive healthcare treatments, meet friends+family, volunteer, and to do basically everything in
life, usually on a daily basis.
Cupertino and Silicon Valley are fabled throughout the world—many of my relatives in Korea
imagine grand cities, rich in amenities, nice facilities, and world class infrastructure. Of course,
when people actually come here, they instead witness office parks, surrounded by sprawling
suburbs, and limited pedestrian and foot traffic due to car dominance. For all of the massive
wealth we have here, our communities are deeply underwhelmed by fault in many cases of
those who came before us, before we knew we'd become a epicenter for jobs, housing, and
schools. In many ways, Cupertino is actually better planned than much of the South Bay,
including our portion of the corridor, but nonetheless our roads, transit systems, bikeways, and
major corridors are all connected across cities, counties, agencies, and so on. We have an
opportunity and duty to play a key role, as a leader in our region, to reverse the poor decisions of
the past—please accept this study, so we can make our community:
(1) Better for Bus Users, Pedestrians, and Cyclists: Here is a simple visual of how important a
well operated, efficient bus system can be. Often the narrative is focused on how a bus is empty.
First, the 23 and 523 (the corridor lines) are two of the most used bus lines in the entire VTA
network. But also, we perpetually create a self fulfilling prophecy when we purposely hinder a
bus's success under the suspicion that it's underutilized. If the bus takes longer to get to your
destination, you will take active steps to use the bus less or not at all, and therefore ridership
declines. People need to see the government and its respective services run well and efficiently
before they see those as competitive alternatives.
images.jpeg
2. Good for Drivers: An underrated reality of having a more shared, safer corridor is that we
could also create a better experience for drivers as well. If we can get more people to use the bus,
we can create a less congested corridor, especially during prime time traffic and closer to Santana
Row/VF, and drivers will have to sit in traffic less. Better cyclist and walking planning also means
that drivers are less likely to accidentally come into contact with active transportation, reducing
fatalities, crashes and accidents (which lead to more congestion and road closures), and making
driving far less stressful.
3. Good for Workers and Students, and Elderly: Cupertino, just like any community in the bay
area, is highly dependent on lower-waged workers, who are often Latino (less than 5% of the city),
and whose families cannot afford to live in the high rent/purchase homes of our city. In many
cases, they rely on the bus to get to and from work, and are the lifeblood of our city—fueling the
few retail stores we frequent, the facilities we operate, the roads we operate, the coffee shops and
bakeries we eat at, and the grocery stores we depend on. Catch the bus during commuting hours,
and you will see these workers, riding the bus to and from work, often sitting in gridlock traffic
because of our poor corridor design. Similarly, students, especially De Anza students, ride the 23
and 523 at extremely high volumes, aided by their smart-pass deal that FHDA has with VTA,
which allows for free bus use. These workers and students cannot afford a car, especially in this
economy—they are living paycheck to paycheck or stretching their financial aid to the absolute
last dollar. Finally, if you regularly ride this corridor, you will frequently see elderly who rely on the
bus to be able to freely live their lives, many of whom are Asian-American, and who otherwise
would be homebound or highly dependent on their families to have freedom.
This corridor study will not undo decades upon decades of failed planning, but this is a necessary
step to bring the vibrancy, safety, and convenience that Cupertino and Silicon Valley deserves.
This DOES NOT preclude future expansions of transit or alternative transportation, but it's a
statement and set of policy recommendations that will steer us away from dying strip malls,
communities oriented around auto dealerships, unnecessary traffic, and tangibly improve a lot of
people's lives.
Sincerely,
Neil Park-McClintick