Loading...
CC 07-21-09C O P E RT I N O APPROVED rvIINUTES CUPERTINO CI7~Y COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, Jule 21, 2009 ROLL CALL At 6:00 p.m. Mayor Orrin Mahoney called the regular meeting to order in the Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Present: Mayor Orrin Mahoney, Vice-Mayor Kris Wang, and Council members Dolly Sandoval, Mark Santoro, and Gilbert Wong. Absent: none. CLOSED SESSION 1. Significant exposure to liti ag tion pursuant to subdivision (b) of GC Section - 54956.9 (one potential case). No documentation in packet. Council was in closed session from 6:00 p. m. unti16:20 p.m. Mayor Mahoney announced that no action was taken. RECESS -Council was in recess from 6:20 p.m. unti16:45 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Orrin Mahoney called the meeting back to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Orrin Mahoney, Vice-Mayor Kris Wang, and Council members Dolly Sandoval, Mark Santoro, and Gilbert Wong. Absent: none. CEREMONIAL MATTERS -PRESENTATIONS 2. Adopt a resolution affirming the City of Cupertino's support and partnership with the 2010 census, Resolution No. 09-121. Doris Tse from the U.S. Census Bureau noted that the response rate for the 2000 census nationally was 67%, the California response rate was 70%, the Santa Clara County response rate was 75%, and the City of Cupertino response rate was 77%. She noted the July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 2 challenges of why people don't report and also noted what was working well so far with Census 2010. She said that right now they are only promoting the census and raising public awareness, but in March of 2010, every household would receive a questionnaire in the mail. Residents interested in more information on the census or in job opportunities can contact her at (408) 202-7156, doris.s.tse e,census.gov, or visit the website at www.census.gov. Sandoval/Wong moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 09-121. The motion carried unanimously. POSTPONEMENTS The Deputy City Clerk noted an updated staff re~~ort for item number 11, regarding the Slurry Seal Program bids, asking Council to defer the aw~~rd of the contract to the Aug. 4 meeting. Wong/Sandoval moved and seconded to continue item number 11 to August 4. The motion carried unanimously. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Deputy City Clerk Grace Schmidt distributed the following items at the meeting: • Amended page 8, minutes of July 7, 2009 (item No. 3) • Updated staff report regarding the Slurry Seal Program bids deferring the award of the contract to Aug. 4 (item No. 11) • Draft "Voluntary Contribution Agreement" between the City of Cupertino and ECI Two Results, LLC, regarding transportation system improvements; PowerPoint presentation; an email from Judy Wilson in support of tree 5-year extension request (item No. 12) • An additional staff report listing General Plan office allocation for major companies, other areas in the City, and future office df;mands; PowerPoint presentation; email to City Council from staff regarding General Plan language related to office allocation for major companies (item No. 13) • PowerPoint presentation titled "Trial Period for anOff--Leash Area for Dogs" and 16 emails dated July 21 from various commu~lity members regarding their preferences for an off-leash area for dogs, a fenced area for dogs, and other topics related to a dog park (item No. 15). (Note: City Council received many other emails on this topic earlier in the week). • Memo from Finance Director David Woo regarding the definition of "Private Telecommunication Service" and a PowerPoint presentation (item No. 16) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Ruby Elbogen talked about the Relay for Life to be held at De Anza College on July 25. She noted that Council members will open the relay with the staff and members of the relay. For more information visit www.relayforlife.org/cupertinoca. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 3 Frank Jelinch, member of the San Francisco ;ihakespeare Festival Board and resident of Cupertino, noted that the Festival will perform its 27th year of free Shakespeare in the Park beginning Sat., Aug. 8 for three weekends. The performances will be held at the Memorial Park Amphitheater and the play, A Comedy of Errors, will be performed. More information is available at www.sfshakes.org/park. CONSENT CALENDAR Wong/Wang moved and seconded to approve: the items on the Consent Calendar as recommended, with the exception of item numbers 3 and 9 which were pulled for discussion. Ayes: Mahoney, Sandoval, Santoro, Wang, and W~~ng. Noes: None. Abstain: None. 4. Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Pay~ible for July 2 and 10, Resolution Nos. 09-112 and 09-113. 5. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for July 10, Resolution No. 09-114. 6. Adopt a resolution replacing Teen Commission Resolution No. 09-078 to delete Section A regarding ranking so that all applicants would be interviewed, Resolution No. 09-115. 7. Adopt a resolution accepting a Quitclaim L)eed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Puttappaiah Muniyappa and Kavitlia Puttappaiah, 10210 Peninsula Avenue, APN 326-22-017, Resolution No. 09-116. The property owners of this residential development agree to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property. 8. Adopt a resolution accepting a Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Arindam Chakraborty and Pompee: Chakraborty, 930 Rose Blossom Drive, APN 359-06-028, Resolution No. 09-117. The property owners of this residential de~relopment agree to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property. 10. Review bids and award the contract for 2009 Reconstruction of Curbs, Gutters, and Sidewalks, Project No. 2009-04, to Maxicrete Inc., in the amount of $418,605.00, and approval of a contingency amount of $40,000 for additional work that may be identified and approved by the Director of Public Works. 11A. Authorize the City Manager to sign, on behalf of the City, a West Valley Community Services application for funding a Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Program. (HPRP) July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 4 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) 3. Approve the minutes from the June 10 and .luly 7 City Council meetings. Deputy City Clerk Grace Schmidt distributed an amendment to the minutes of July 7, 2009, page 8, paragraph 7, to delete the phr;~se "...shall not create a strategic plan but..." Sandoval/Wang moved and seconded to df;fer this item to Aug 4 for staff to clarify that section in the July 7 minutes. The motion carried with Mayor Mahoney voting no. 9. Adopt a resolution approving a Parcel N[~ for condominium purposes, Monta Vista Oaks Inc., a California Corporation, 2',1761 Granada Avenue, APN 357-17-116, Resolution No. 09-118. Approval of the parcel map permits the map to be forwarded to the County for recording, which completes the subdivision. Wang/Sandoval moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 09-118. The motion carried unanimously. 11. Review bids and award the contract for the; 2009 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. 2009- 06 to the lowest, qualified bidder contingent on staff providing the results of the bid opening at the meeting. Under "postponements" this item was continued to August 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Consider a major amendment modi ins the Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2008- OS), Use Permit Modification (M-2008-03), Tree Removal Permit (TR-2008-06), and Director's Minor Modification (DIR-2008-32) for the purpose of extending the expiration date of these approvals for six years, I~hasing construction, clarifying conditions of approval, and modifying the traffic and signal improvement condition, Application No. M-2009-02, Tim Kelly (Embarcadero Capital Partners), 1 Results Way, APN Nos. 357- 20-046, 357-20-041 (continued from June 16). The Deputy City Clerk distributed a draft "Voluntary Contribution Agreement" between the City of Cupertino and ECI Two Results, LLC, regarding transportation system improvements; an email from Judy Wilsor,~ in support of the 5-year extension request; and a PowerPoint presentation. Senior Planner Colin Jung reviewed the sniff report and PowerPoint presentation. Applicant Sandy James explained that th~:y are asking for an extension due to the poor economic conditions. She also noted that they have negotiated with the staff to deal with traffic mitigation as a separate issue. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 5 John Hamilton, Managing Principal of Eml~arcadero Capital Partners, reiterated the need for an extension and asked for council support. Mayor Mahoney opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Jennifer Griffin said that it is important that this land remain as a tech site and said she is glad that the owner is willing to take a risk. She urged Council to make sure the lush landscaping is maintained on the property. Mike Foulkes, President of the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, said he supported the extension. Mayor Mahoney closed the public hearing ~~t 7:41 p.m. Sandoval moved and Mahoney seconded to approve the following, and the motion carried unanimously: • The Major Amendment (M-2009-02) modifying the Use Permit modification, Architectural and Site Approval, the Tree Removal permit, and the Director's Minor Modification to extend t}ie expiration dates for five years, phasing construction, clarifying conditions of approval, and modifying the traffic and signal improvement condition • Staff's recommendation to delete Condition of Approval 4b in its entirety from the Planning Commission resolution, since the condition has already been fulfilled • Deleted the following sentence from the second bullet of Condition 3: "The Community Development Director has the authority to approve reasonable, minor adjustments of the plans" • Amended the second sentence in (:ondition 4a to read: "The improvements may include, but are not limited to, installing new pedestrian signal heads, a new traffic signal cabinet, a new traffic signal controller, new traffic signal loops, and replacing damaged pavement on th.e Results Way approach, pavement restoration and lane restriping" • Accepted the applicant's Voluntary Contribution Agreement providing $200,000 to reduce traffic congestion and iincrease pedestrian/bike safety within '/~ mile radius of the project site west of Highway 85 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 13. Consider General Plan Amendments, Application Nos. GPA-2009-01 and EA-2009-03, City of Cupertino, Citywide (continued from June 2): a. Adopt a Negative Declaration b. Consider increasing the office allocation in the General Plan July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 6 The Deputy City Clerk distributed an additional staff report listing General Plan office allocation for major companies, other areas in the City, and future office demands; a copy of the PowerPoint presentation; and an email to City Council from staff regarding General Plan language related to office allo~~ation for major companies. City Planner Gary Chao reviewed the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Mahoney opened the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. Jim Cunneen, representing Hewlett Packard, said he supported staff's recommendation. Mike Foulkes, representing Apple Compu-ter, said it was important for the company to grow in Cupertino and asked for Council's support for the staff recommendation. Barry Chang said that he isn't speaking for growth or anti-growth but asked Council to consider the impact on the housing element while considering the office allocation because it would affect the entire city. Jennifer Griffin said that Cupertino is a min: of residential, office, and high tech and urged Council to proceed cautiously to be sure there is room for everyone. Keith Murphy said that the City should be prepared and needs to also grow on the housing element side. He urged Council to weigh the two issues together. Tom Hugunin said that he didn't see any information on the major companies in the staff report in the packet and that the public h~~d no way to view the document that Council received this evening on the dais on this issue. He asked what constituted a major company, would the office allocation beneficiaries lobby ABAG on the housing element portion, and how the City allocates the cost of the amendment to the beneficiaries. Hari Guleria said that this is one of the only places where property values are maintained, and he urged Council to encourage large companies in Cupertino. Mayor Mahoney closed the public hearing ~~t 8:48 p.m. Council directed staff to recalculate the square footage of the existing major companies. Sandoval moved and Wang seconded to adopt a Negative Declaration. The motion carried unanimously. Wong moved and Santoro seconded to approve an office allocation of 483,053 square feet, with the major companies having 450.,000 square feet total, and the rest of the square footage going into the other areas. The motion failed with Mahoney, Sandoval, and Wang voting no, and Santoro and Wong voting yeas. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 7 Sandoval moved and Wang seconded to amend the General Plan to add an office allocation of 483,053 square feet analyzed in the 2005 General Plan. The motion carried unanimously. Sandoval moved and Wang seconded that the 483,053 square feet should go into the category of major companies in the Gene-ral Plan. The motion carried with Mahoney, Sandoval, and Wang voting yes and Santor~~ and Wong voting no. Santoro moved and Wong seconded to tak:e out the word "existing" in the definition of major companies. The motion failed with ]Mahoney, Sandoval, and Wang voting no, and Santoro and Wong voting yes. Council recessed from 9:20 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. NEW BUSINESS 14. Conduct a hearing and adopt a resolution approving the assessment of fees for the annual weed abatement program (private parcels), Resolution No. 09-119. County Weed Abatement Program Coordinator Moe Kumre answered questions from Council regarding fees, how notices are mailed out, and when inspections were done. Phil Aramoonie said that his property was inspected the second week in April and he did the weed abatement work the third week in April. He said that he would still pay the County's assessment fee. Don Chen said that his property was inspected but he never received a letter. He noted that last year the notice was sent out in .June, and in April this year, according to the County. He said that he normally cuts his weeds in May when the rainy season is over and in this case the County had already done the work and assessed the fee. He protested the fee as excessive and unfair and requested a waiver. Mr. Kumre answered questions from Council including a question regarding an appeal process. He responded that if the property owner can show that the County is in error of having done the work or miscalculating thf; fees, then the charges can be removed. Sandoval moved and Wong seconded to ~idopt Resolution No. 09-119. Wang offered an amendment to waive the fees for the two people who protested this evening. The motion failed for lack of a second. The original motion carried with Santoro voting no. Council gave direction to staff to agendi2;e in the near future a discussion regarding the County weed abatement deadline date for next year and an explanation of the County's fees. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 8 15. Consider the following actions for a trial eriod for anoff--leash area for dogs: a. Adopt rules for use of an off-leash area for dogs in a City park b. Authorize a subcommittee from members of the Citizens Group to work with the City and County of Santa Clara to conduct a study for a fenced dog park at Stevens Creek County Park c. After neighbor and park user support is obtained by the Citizens Group Committee, authorize asix-month trial for a fenced off-leash area at Linda Vista Park d. Continue the community discussion with a smaller, appointed group of citizens for a trial period for an unfenced off leash area at Memorial Park and/or Jollyman Park The Deputy City Clerk distributed copies of a PowerPoint presentation titled "Trial Period for an Off-Leash Area for Dogs" gas well as emails dated July 21 from various community members regarding their preferences for an off-leash area for dogs, a fenced area for dogs, and other topics related to z~ dog park. (Note: City Council received other emails earlier in the week). Senior Recreation Supervisor Julia Lamy reviewed the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. The following individuals spoke against anoff-leash area for dogs: Judy Harrison Rok Sosic Anu Srikanth Randy Ong Adina Bidel Vickie Wu Cheng Zhang Chris Copeland Barry Feeley Sophie Wang Hongqing Yi Ardith West Sanjay Sawhney John Xiao Greg Labmeier Lynn Frake Paul McNulty Mary Jo Gunderson John Woolfolk Dan Koren Paul Chan Tamima Koren Sue Copeland Philip Tsai David Fung (also spoke for Cecil Coe, 1`Qehrnaz Hada, Ted Hou, David Klinger, Judy Klinger, Dan Koren, Robert Kroeger, Erin Labmeier, Manisha Puranik, Runping Qi, Premika Ratnam, and Karen Seale and distributed a handout titled, "Off-Leash Dog Policy Proposal for Cupertino City Parks";i July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 9 Adwait Sathye (distributed a petition titled, "Petition against off-leash dogs in Cupertino parks (especially Jollyman Park)" Kuo-Lon Soong (distributed a handout titled, "Save Linda Vista Park People's Voice") Their comments included: support of a legal, fenced, off-leash area in Memorial Park or Linda Vista Park; issues with wildlife in parks like Linda Vista if there is a fenced, off- leash area; too dangerous for children under 4 years old in Jollyman Park; off-leash dogs would influence park quality; cleaning up <iog waste is costly; complete discussions such as safety issues before going to trial; dogs off-leash can be over-exuberant; don't use only one particular park for a fenced in area; parking lot will fill up and people will park in the street; noise issues with dogs barking; there are already fenced-in dog parks not too far away; the proposal is too broad; enforcement issues. The following individuals spoke in support of an off-leash area for dogs: Geoff Fong Eric Wilson Betsy Daugherty Jim Black (also Black) Iraa Guleria spoke for Barbara Carol Miller Sherri Stein Mindy Grant Jeff Hu Alvin Hu Vivian Hu Darcy Paul, Parks and Recreation Commi;~sioner, said he was not speaking on behalf of the commission, but as someone who had been involved in the discussion for some time, and he wished to commend the vibrant and open discussions that were taking place on the matter. Don Rosenbaum (also spoke for Arlene ]~osenbaum and Sherry Fang and submitted a handout titled, "Consider actions for a trial period for anoff--leash area for dogs") Hari Guleria (also spoke for Melissa Dry~;dale, Tania Tengan, and Karen McKinlay and submitted a petition for off-leash dogs in Jollyman Park that was included in the Council packet as Attachment K) Their comments included: parks are almost empty at most times of the day; many hours could be set aside during the day for an off leash area without interfering with other park users; Cupertino parks should be ml~lti-use to accommodate all users without discrimination; have simultaneous trials :For both fenced and unfenced off-leash areas; perform surveys of park users and neighborhood residents; Jollyman petition shows active citizens ready to help during a trial; suggested locations for off-leash areas include Memorial Park, Library Field, and Linda `'ista; don't impose setbacks; noise levels not an issue; have trials at many parks and not ju~;t one specific park. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 10 Council member discussion followed. Council member Santoro suggested that a Stevens Creek Canyon be kept on the list or another place that's not a neighborhood park, but which is big enough and has sufficient traffic capacity to accommodate an off-le~~sh area. He was in favor of starting a trial period in the next 4 to 6 weeks in local parkas; and requiring special tags on the dogs using the trial area. He was opposed to fencing in Linda Vista Park but thought it was a reasonable site for anoff--lead area becau:~e it has some natural barriers. Other choices would include Jollyman Memorial Park. 1Je was in favor of giving the list to a smaller subcommittee to do an impartial survey ;bout hours, and it would require over 50% approval of the survey takers, and he preferred a 9-12 month trial. He said that for a fenced park, the City should look for an area first, decide what it's going to cost, and then decide if the City can do it. Vice Mayor Wang said she understood pe~~ple's fear of dogs, and concerns about noise, traffic, smells, and other impacts. She was. in favor of working with the County, perhaps on the site mentioned at Stevens Creek Park, which would be a permanent, long-term solution and wouldn't impose on those people who are afraid of getting bit. She asked how long the trial period, if there was gone, would run. She said if there were no complaints and that location becomes an oi:f leash park permanently, the residents need to know that in advance. Mayor Mahoney asked if Vice Mayor Wing was agreeable to the off-leash rules. She replied that it was not urgent at this point, since the Council knew her position. She supported option B, (Authorize a subcommittee from members of the Citizens Group to work with the City and County of Santa Clara to conduct a study for a fenced dog park at Stevens Creek County Park), but she did. not support C (After neighbor and park user support is obtained by the Citizens Grou~~ Committee, authorize asix-month trial for a fenced off-leash area at Linda Vista Park) ~or D (Continue the community discussion with a smaller, appointed group of citizens for a trial period for an unfenced off-leash area at Memorial Park and/or Jollyman Park.) Council member Wong said he was in f<<vor of having a committee study the Stevens Creek County Park area, although he felt it was too far outside the city and he would prefer to something inside the city. He thought that both groups were not opposed to a fenced dog park, but the difficulty was finding the right location. He suggested another area for consideration, north of the Oaks Shopping Center on Mary Ave across the street from Memorial Park. He supported a fenced in park area but didn't think that Linda Vista was going to work. He supported a trial period for off leash areas, but more work was needed with staff and the citizens. He said he was in favor of adopting the rules. Council member Sandoval asked for clarification on the trial period and if it would occur at the same time as the neighborhood survf:y. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 11 Senior Recreation Supervisor Julia Lamy s~iid the citizen's group recommendation was a 6-month trial, and staff recommended that t:he trial take place after neighborhood support had been gathered by the citizen group. Council member Sandoval said she was in_favor of adopting the rules; in favor of Stevens Creek park as a location; undecided about Linda Vista Park, but was willing to explore an off-leash unfenced option in Linda Vista Park, Memorial Park, and Jollyman Park areas. She said it would be nice to accommodate ~~eople who have to go to work so that they can run their dogs early in the morning but she did not like the idea of having off-leash areas start at 5:00 a.m. so she would propose the: committee look at timing of off leash hours. She was also in favor of the dogs wearing a special tag, and suggested identification for owners too, so it was obvious which people and dogs were using the off-leash area. Mayor Mahoney said he was in favor of the following: Adopting the rules, following up on Stevens Creek Park, pursuing unfenceC~ off-leash areas in multiple parks with some kind of tag. Regarding unfenced areas, if they are limited to a certain area a few hours a day, it may have a good effect on controlling existing behaviors such as dog owners letting their dogs off leash in other locations or times. That is one of the purposes of the trial, and it makes it possible for people to avoid the area if they don't want to be near that activity. He mentioned the Main Street Cupertino project as another trial location, but thought that the Stevens Creek Park locatio~i may be the best test case. Santoro moved and Sandoval seconded to adopt rules for use of an off-leash area for dogs in a City park; authorize a subcommittee i=rom members of the Citizens Group to work with the City and County of Santa Clara to conduct a study for a fenced dog park at Stevens Creek County Park and continue t~~ look at an alternate site; have staff initiate a neighborhood survey for neighbors within -1000 feet in all directions from Jollyman Park, Linda Vista Park, Memorial Park, and the Library Field for an unfenced off-leash area and 30 days of surveys for park users; 50°/~ of those surveyed must agree to an unfenced off-leash area; blue tags are required for both dogs and owners to use unfenced areas; look into increasing either code enforcement or sheriff services to patrol the area; develop an educational program for neighbors and Users of the site and include the information on the city channel; add signage to the off-leash sites. Wang offered a friendly amendment to survey neighbors within 2000 feet in all directions from the 4 parks. Sandoval suggested 1501) feet for the survey and Santoro accepted the friendly amendment for 1500 feet. The motion carried unanimously.* *At the City Council meeting of August ~l, 2009, Vice Mayor Kris Wang clarified that she meant to vote no on the July 21 vote rE;garding options C and D (a six-month trial of an off-leash area at Linda Vista Park and a~ntinued discussions about anoff-leash area at Memorial Park and/or Jollyman Park). Council recessed from 1:57 a.m. to 2:05 a.m. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 12 16. Consider placing a measure on the November 3, 2009, General Municipal Election to amend the telephone Utility Users Tax (UUT) ordinance. The amendment would modernize the municipal code wording t~~ treat all taxpayers the same regardless of technology used, with no rate increases and no changes to senior citizen exemptions: a. Adopt a resolution to place a measure on the ballot at the November 3, 2009, General Municipal Election, Resolution No. 09-120; or b. Defer the matter at this time and direct staff to undertake further study and report back with options regarding such a measure at a future election The Deputy City Clerk distributed a memo from Finance Director David Woo regarding the definition of "Private Telecommunicatic-n Service" and a PowerPoint presentation. Finance Director David Woo reviewed the staff report and PowerPoint. Jim Cunneen, representing Hewlett Packard, supported staff's recommendation. Mike Foulkes, representing the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, supported staff's recommendation. Jennifer Griffin asked if she, as a private user, would pay taxes on both her telephone landline and her cell phone, would Cupertino receive the revenue, and she also asked if websites are taxed. Mayor Mahoney responded that she would be taxed on both phone lines and Cupertino would receive the revenue, but there no plan to tax websites. Sandoval moved and Wang seconded to adopt Resolution No. 091-120. The motion carried unanimously. 17. Consider canceling the meeting of Au ug st 4. (No documentation in packet). Council took no action. ORDINANCES 18. Conduct the second reading of Ordinancc; No. 09-2046: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City Of Cupertino amending Chapter 9.06 of the Cupertino Municipal Code relating to massage establishments anti services by replacing it in its entirety." Wang moved and Santoro seconded to react the ordinance by title only and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes: Mahoney, Sandoval, Santoro, Wang, and Wong. Noes: None. Wang moved and Santoro seconded to enact Ordinance No. 09-2046. Ayes: Mahoney, Sandoval, Santoro, Wang, and Wong. Noes: None. July 21, 2009 Cupertino City Council Page 13 STAFF REPORTS -None COUNCIL REPORTS Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events. ADJOURNMENT At 3:07 a.m. Wed., July 22, the meeting was adjourned. ,~ ~ ~ L --~~,,- c Grace Schmidt, Deputy City Clerk Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the City Council meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click on the appropriate Packet. Most Council meetings are shown live on Comcas~t Channel 26 and AT&T U-verse Channel 99 and are available at your convenience at www.cupertino.or~. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click Archived Webcast. Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364.