Loading...
03-095 Biggs Cardosa Associates - Mary Ave Bridge3 -05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF CUPERTINO And BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. for the MARY AVENUE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE A CUPERTINO CAPITAL IMPRO`dEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT (Contract No. Dated 1913 - 001\2071148.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1913 - 001\2071148.1 PAGE 1. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................... ............................... 1 2. TERM OF AGREEMENT ................................................................................................ ............................... 2 3. SERVICES CONSULTANT AGREES TO PERFORM ................................................ ............................... 2 4. COMPENSATION .............................................................................................................. ..............................2 5. MAXIMUM COSTS .......................................................................................................... ............................... 3 6. QUALIFIED PERSONNEL ............................................................................................... ..............................4 7. REPRESENTATIVES FOR BOTH PARTIES ............................................................... ............................... 4 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND GENERAL LIABILITY ................................................... ............................... 5 9. LIABILITY OF CITY ....................................................................................................... ............................... 5 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ................................................................................... ............................... 6 11. INSURANCE ...................................................................................................................... ............................... 6 12. SUSPENSION OF SERVICES ......................................................................................... ............................... 7 13. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSI: ....................................................... ............................... 7 14. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CONVENIENCE ....................................... ............................... 8 15. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST /OTHER AGREEMENTS ............................................ ............................... 11 16. PROPRIETARY OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CITY; PUBLICITY .............................. 11 17. NOTICE TO THE PARTIES .......................................................................................... ............................... 12 18. OWNERSHIP OF RESULTS/WORK FOR HIRE ....................................................... ............................... 12 19. AUDIT AND INSPECTION RECORDS ....................................................................... ............................... 13 20. SUBCONTRACTING /ASSIGNMENT /CITY EMPLOYEES ..................................... ............................... 13 21. NON - DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ......... ............................... 14 22. DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE POLICY ........................................................................ ............................... 14 23. COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ......................... ............................... 14 24. DISPUTES ........................................................................................................................ ............................... 14 25. AGREEMENT MADE IN CALIFORNIA; VENUE .................................................... ............................... 15 26. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS ....................................................................................... ............................... 15 1 1913 - 001\2071148.1 27. CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................................................... ............................... 16 28. MISCELLANEOUS ........................................................................................................... .............................16 29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATIONS OF AGREEMENT ............................ ............................... 16 30. SURVIVAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS ............. ...................................................... ............................... 17 1913-001\2071148.1 THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is dated this 11 day of 62erzPQEx _ , 2003, in the City of Cupertino, State of California, by and between Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as ( "Consultant ") and CITY OF CUPERTINO, hereinafter referred to as ( "City "). Recitals WHEREAS, City wishes to retain Consultant to provide design services for its Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge project, which is a component of City's Capital Improvement Program; WHEREAS, Consultant was selected by means of City's consultant selection process, and represents that it is qualified to provide the services required by City as set forth under this Agreement; WHEREAS, City's rules and regulations authorize City to enter into agreements for professional temporary services; and WHEREAS, the services proposed in this Agreement are professional and temporary in nature, and City does not have regular employees who possess the necessary specialized knowledge to provide such services. Now, THEREFORE, or good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, stipulated and agreed, the parties agree as follows: Definitions Where any word or phrase defined below, or a pronoun used in place thereof, is used in any part of this Agreement, it shall have the meaning herein set forth. Agreement This Agreement together with all attachments and appendices and other documents incorporated herein by reference, including, but not limited to, Appendices A (Scope of Services), B (Payments to Consultant), and C (Insurance), attached hereto. City City of Cupertino. Upon written notice to Consultant, may delegate all or portions of its responsibility as City to a third party contractor or other person or entity. Consultant Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc Program Cupertino Capital Improvement Program Project City's Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge project, which is a component of City's Capital Improvement Program]. Services All work, labor, materials and services required under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, provided pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including without LIMITATION archit.ctural, engineering, coordination and administrative services. 1913 - 001\2071148.1 Subconsultants Consultant's consultants, subconsultants, contractors and subcontractors, of any tier, for whom Consultant is solely respoisible. 2. Term of Agreement All work comprising the Services shall be deemed performed under this Agreement. This Agreement shall conclude upon the completion of the Project. Services under this agreement are anticipated to commence on or about September 30, 2003, and be completed September 30, 2004. Actual commence and completion dates are subject to change by agreement of the parties to the Agreement. 3. Services Consultant Agrees to Perform 3.1 Consultant shall perform all Services described in Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 3.2 Consultant shall complete all Services required by this Agreement within the times specified in the project schedule deliverable per Appendix A. Consultant agrees that the project schedule includes reasonable allowances for completion of the Services, including all time required for City's review and approval of deliverables and for approval of the deliverables by all authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and the Services. Consultant shall achieve its scheduled Milestones (as shown on the Milestone Schedule) unless an excusable event causes delay (excusable delay), and unless Consultant gives written notice of the excusable event and requests a time extension within ten days of the occurrence of the excusable event. (Excusable events shall be limited to acts of neglect by City or City's agents or consultants when acting at City's direction, breaches of this Agreement by City, Acts of God such as fire, flood, earthquake, or epidemic, or delay by a construction contractor during the construction phase of the Project, or any other circumstances beyond Consultant's reasonable control.) If the period of excusable delay caused by an excusable event concurs with a Consultant caused or other nonexcusable delay, City may (but shall not be required to) grant a time extension without compensation. 3.3 Consultant may recover extra costs resulting from excusable delay upon showing that the costs claimed (i) resulted from time and /or expenses actually incurred in performing Services, (ii) were incurred by Consultant as a direct result of the delay and not otherwise within Consultant's scope of Services, and (iii) are documented to the City's satisfaction. (For example, and not by way of limitation, contract punchlist and final inspection Services, whenever performed, and Services related to correcting deficiencies in Consultant's work, shall be within Basic Services and not entitle Consultant to extra costs or Additional Services.) 3.4 Should the progress of the Services under this Agreement at any time fall behind schedule for any reason other than excusable delays, Consultant shall apply such additional manpower and resources as necessary to bring progress of the Services under this Agreement back on schedule and consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.5 Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 4. Compensation 4.1 City shall pay Consultant compensation according to Appendix B, Payments to Consultant. City shall pay Consultant in monthly payments on or before the last day of each month for Services in an amount which City, in its sole discretion, concludes is the value of the Services that have been properly performed as of the last day of the immediately preceding month and is due under Appendix B. 1913 - 001\2071148.1 4.2 City shall not incur any charges under this Agreement, nor shall any payments become due to Consultant for any payment period on the Project, until City receives all deliverables required under Appendix A and the project schedule for the payment period (if any) and reasonably accepts such deliverables as meeting the requirements of this Agreement. In cases where Consultant has partially completed one or more deliverables due during a payment period, and if Consultant demonstrates diligent progress thereon, then City may make a partial progress payment based upon Consultant's percentage completion of the partially completed deliverables and diligent progress but taking into account any adve -se impacts upon City. 4.3 City will not withhold entire payment if a questioned amount is involved, but will issue payment in the amount of the total invoice less any questioned amount(s). City will make payment for questioned amounts(s) upon City's receipt of any requested documentation verifying the claimed amount(s) and City's determination that the amount is due under the terms of this Agreement. City shall advise Consultant, in writing, within 15 days of receipt of the requested documentation. Final payment will be made when all Services required under this Agreement have been completed to the reasonable satisfaction of City including, without limitation, Consultant's transmittal of all deliverables to City required by Appendix A and the project schedule. 4.4 Invoices and any other statements of cha ges furnished by Consultant under this Agreement must be in a form acceptable to City. All amounts paid by City to Consultant shall be subject to audit by City. Payment shall be made by City to Consultant at the address stated hereinabove. Consultant shall comply with Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 48 Chapter 1, Part 31, and CFR 49, Part 18. 5. Maximum Costs 5.1 City's obligation hereunder shall not at any time exceed the amount approved by City and approved by City's Director of Public Works for payment to the Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and as shown in the cost proposal in Appendix B. 5.2 Except as may be provided by City ordinances governing emergency conditions, City has not authorized its employees, officers and agents to request Consultant to perform Services or to provide materials, equipment and supplies that would result in Consultant performing Services or providing materials, equipment and supplies that exceed the scope of the Services, materials, equipment and supplies agreed upon in the Agreement unless City amends the Agreement in writing and approves the amendment as required by law to authorize the additional Services, materials, equipment or supplies. 5.3 City shall not reimburse Consultant for Services, materials, equipment or supplies provided by Consultant beyond the scope of the Services, materials, equipment and supplies agreed upon in the Agreement and unless approved by a written amendment to the Agreement having been executed and approved in the same manner as this Agreement. 6. Qualified Personnel 6.1 Services under this Agreement shall be performed only by competent personnel under the supervision of and /or in the employment of Consultant. Consultant shall make every effort to conform with City's reasonable requests regarding assignment of personnel, but all personnel, including those assigned at City's request, shall be supervised by Consultant. 1913-001\2071148.1 6.2 Consultant agrees that all professional personnel assigned to the Project will be listed on Schedule 6.2, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (including any replaced, substituted or additional personnel, "Listed Personnel ") and that it is Consultant's intention that the Listed Personnel will continue their assignments on the Project during the entire term of this Agreement. It is recognized that the Listed Personnel are not bound by personal employment contracts to Consultant. Consultant agrees that reassignment, replacement or substitution from the Project for any reason whatsoever of any Listed Personnel (any such event, a "Reassignment ") during the Agreement period shall only be with other professional personnel who have equivalent experience and shall be in consultation with City. Any costs associated with any Reassignment shall be borne exclusively by Consultant. Resumes for all initial Listed Personnel shall be attached to Schedule 6.2 and by this reference incorporated herein. 7. Representatives for Both Parties 7.1 Each party hereby designates the following representative: Glenn Goepfert, Assistant Director of Public Works, for City; and Mahvash Harms, Principal of Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc., for Consultant. These representatives are authorized to act on the respective parties' behalf with respect to this Agreement. Each party may delegate all or some of the representatives' role and function to some other representative, or change its representative, at any time and with notice to the other party. 7.2 For purposes of this Agreement, except ror notices specified under Section 17 below, each party shall direct all communications to the other party through the foregoing representatives, or such other individuals as a party may notify the other in writing. 7.3 Consultant represents that it has reviewed Appendix A and that in its professional judgment the Services to be performed under this Agreement can be performed for a fee within the maximum amount set forth in the Compensation Schedule established in Appendix B and within the times specified in the project schedule deliverable per Appendix A. 7.4 Consultant represents that it is qualified to perform the Services and that it possesses the necessary licenses and /or permits required to perform the Services or will obtain such licenses and/or permits prior to time such licenses and /or permits are required. Consultant also represents that it has extensive knowledge of all applicable building codes, laws, regulations and ordinances. 7.5 Consultant represents that it has specialized expertise in designing and observing construction of facilities similar to those intended for the Project. Consultant agrees that the Services shall be performed in a manner that conforms to the currently prevailing standards of architectural and/or engineering practice observed by other practitioners of Consultant's profession performing services similar to the Services. 7.6 The granting of any progress payment by City, or the receipt thereof by Consultant, or any inspection, review, approval or oral statement by any representative of City or any other governmental entity, shall in no way waive or limit the obligations in this Section 7, including but not limited to cases where the defective or below standard Services may not have been apparent or detected at the time of such payment, inspection, review or approval. 8. Indemnification and General Liability 8.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Section 2782), Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Cupertino, and its officers, departments, officials and employees (collectively "Indemnitees ") from and against any 1913-001\2071148.1 and all claims, loss, cost, damage, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or its Subconsultants), reasonable expense and liability of every kind, nature and description (including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) that arise from or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from: (1) the Services under this Agreement, or any part thereof, but only to the extent that any of the above are caused by any negligent act or omission of Consultant, any Subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control (collectively "Liabilities "). Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify any Indemnitee shall not apply to the extent that such Liabilities are caused in whole or in part by the negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee. 8.2 Consultant shall defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to City), indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnitees from all loss, cost, damage, expense, liability or claims, in law or in equity, including attorneys' fees, court costs, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses, that may at any time arise for any infringement of the patent rights, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, service mark or any other proprietary right of any person or persons in consequence of the use by City, or any of the other Indemnitees, of articles or Services to be supplied in the performance of this Agreement. 8.3 City shall include a provision in the construction contract with the general contractor on the Project requiring the general contractor to indemnify Consultant for damages resulting from the negligence of the general contractor and its subcontractors. City shall also include a provision in the construction contract with the general contractor on the project requiring the general contractor to name Consultant as an additional insured on its CGL insurance coverage. The risk of an inadvertent omission of such provisions is on Consultant. Therefore, Consultant shall review the construction contract prior to bidding to -nsure that such provision has been included in the draft of the bid documents. 8.4 Consultant shall place in its subconsulting agreements and cause its Subconsultants to agree to indemnities and insurance obligations in Favor of City and other Indemnitees in the exact form and substance of those contained in this Agreement. 9. Liability of City 9.1 Except as provided in Appendix A, City's obligations under this Agreement shall be limited to the payment of the compensation provided for in Sections 3, 4 and 5 of this Agreement. 9.2 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in no event shall City be liable, regardless of whether any claim is based on contract or tort, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages, including, but not limited to, lost profits or revenue, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the Services performed in connection with this Agreement. 9.3 City shall not be responsible for any damage to persons or property as a result of the use, misuse or failure of any equipment used by Consultant, or by any of its employees, even though such equipment be furnished, rented or loaned to Consultant by City. The acceptance or use of such equipment by Consultant or any of its employees shall be construed to mean that Consultant accepts full responsibility for and agrees to exonerate, indemnify, defend and save harmless City from and against any and all claims for any damage or injury of any type, including attorneys' fees, arising from the use, misuse or failure of such equipment, whether such damage be to the Consultant, its employees, City employees or third parties, or to property belonging to any of the above. 1913 -001 \2071148.1 9.4 Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any right or remedy, whether in equity or at law, which City may have under this Agreement or any applicable law. All rights and remedies of City, whether under this .Agreement or other applicable law, shall be cumulative. 10. Independent Contractor 10.1 Consultant shall be deemed at all times to be an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the manner in which Consultant performs the Services required of Consultant by the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall be liable for the acts and omissions of it its Subconsultants, its employees and its agents. 10.2 Nothing contained herein shall be construed as creating an employment, agency or joint venture relationship between City and Consultant. Consultant acknowledges that neither it nor any of its employees or agents shall, for any purpose whatsoever, be deemed to be City employees, and shall not be entitled to receive any benefits conferred on City employees, including without limitation workers' compensation, pension, health, insurance or other benefits. 10.3 Consultant shall pay all taxes ( includ:ng California sales and use taxes) levied upon this Agreement, the transaction, or the Services and /or goods delivered pursuant hereto without additional compensation, regardless of w iich party has liability for such tax under applicable law, and any deficiency, interest or penalty asserted with respect thereto. Consultant represents that it will collect, report, and pay all sales and or use taxes to the State Board of Equalization. Upon full payment, the Consultant will issue City a receipt pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 6203, relieving City of all liability for any tax relating to the scope of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all other taxes including but not limited to any applicable City of Cupertino business tax, not explicitly assumed in writing by City hereunder. The Consultant shall comply with all valid administrative regulations respecting the assumption of liability for the payment of payroll taxes and contributions as above described and to provide any necessary information with respect thereto to proper authorities. 10.4 Consultant shall be available as much as reasonably possible to City staff during City's normal working hours or as otherwise requested by City. Terms in this Agreement referring to direction from City shall be construed as providing for direction as to policy and the result of Consultant's Services only and not as to the means by which such a result is obtained. 10.5 Nothing in this Agreement shall operate; to confer rights or benefits on persons or entities not parties to this Agreement. 11. Insurance 11.1 Consultant shall comply with all requirements of Appendix C, which is attached and made part of this Agreement, including without limitation, providing evidence of insurance in form and substance and by the time described therein. 11.2 As described in Appendix C, City has informed Consultant that prior to the execution of this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish to City satisfactory proof that Consultant has taken out for the entire period required by this Agreement, as further described in Appendix C, the following insurance, in a form satisfactory to City and with an insurance carrier satisfactory to City, authorized to do business in California and rated by A. M. Best & Company [ B+ or better, financial category size [ FSC IX ] or better, which will protect those described in Appendix C from claims described below which arise or are alleged to have arisen out of or result from the acts or omissions of Consultant for which Consultant may be legally liable, whether performed by Consultant, or by those employed directly or indirectly by it, or by anyone for whose acts Consultant may be liable. 6 1913-001\2071148.1 12. Suspension of Services 12.1 City may, without cause, order Consultant to suspend, delay or interrupt ( "suspend ") Services pursuant to this Agreement, in whole or in part, for such periods of time as City may determine in its sole discretion. City shall deliver to Consultant written notice of the extent of the suspension at least seven (7) calendar days before the commencement thereof. Suspension shall be treated as an excusable delay and Consultant shall be compensated for such delay to the extent provided under this Agreement. 12.2 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section, no compensation shall be made to the extent that performance is, was or would have been so suspended, delayed or interrupted by a cause for which Consultant is responsible. 13. Termination of Agreement for Cause 13.1 if at any time City believes Consultant may not be adequately performing its obligations under this Agreement, that Consultant may fail to complete the Services as required by this Agreement, or has provided written notice of observed deficiencies in Consultant's performance, City may request from Consultant prompt written assurances of performance and a written plan to correct the observed deficiencies in Consultant's performance. Consultant shall provide such written assurances and written plan acceptable to City within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of written request. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any failure to provide written assurances and a written plan to correct observed deficiencies, in the required time, is a material breach under this Agreement. 13.2 Consultant shall be in default of this Agreement and City may, in addition to any other legal or equitable remedies available to City, terminate Consultant's right to proceed under the Agreement, in whole or in part, for cause: 13.2.1 Should Consultant make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, admit in writing its inability to pay its debts as the}, become due, file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, file a petition or answer seeking for itself any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under any present or future statute, law, or regulation, file any answer admitting or not contesting the naterial allegations of a petition filed against Consultant in any such proceeding, or seek, consent to, or acquiesce in, the appointment of any trustee, receiver, custodian or liquidator of Consultant or of all or any substantial part of the properties of Consultant, or if Consultant, its directors or shareholders, take action to dissolve or liquidate Consultant; or 13.2.2 Should Consultant commit a material breach of this Agreement and not cure such breach within ten (10) calendar days of the date of notice from City to Consultant demanding such cure; or, if such failure is curable but not curable within such ten (10) day period, within such period of time as is reasonably necessary to accomplish such cure. (In order for Consultant to avail itself of this time period in excess of 10 calendar days, Consultant must provide City within the 10 day period a written plan acceptable to City to cure said breach, which includes, for example, evidence of necessary resources, subcontract commitments, schedules and recovery schedules showing a realistic and achievable plan to cure the breach. Consultant must then diligently commence and continue such cure according to the written plan.); or 13.2.3 Should Consultant violate or allow a violation of any valid law, statute, regulation, rule, ordinance, permit, license or order of any governmental agency in effect at the time of performance of the Services and applicable to the Project or Services and does not cure 1913-001\2071148.1 such violation within ten (10) clays of the date of the notice from City to Consultant demanding such cure; or, if such failure is curable but not curable within such ten (10) day period, within such period of time as is reasonably necessary to accomplish such cure. (In order for Consultant to avail itself of this time period in excess of 10 calendar days, Consultant must provide City within the 10 day period a written plan to cure said violation acceptable to City, and then diligently commence and continue performance of such cure according to the written plan.) 13.3 In the event of termination by City as provided herein for cause: 13.3.1 City shall compensate Consultant for the value of the Services delivered to City upon termination as determined in accordance with the Agreement, subject to all rights of offset and backcharges, but City shall not compensate Consultant for its costs in terminating the Services or any cancellation charges owed to third parties. 13.3.2 Consultant shall deliver to City possession of all tangible aspects of the Services in their then condition, including but not limited to, all copies (electronic and hard copy) of designs, engineering, Project records, cost data of all types, drawings and specifications and contracts with vendors and Subconsultants, and all other documentation associated with the Project, and all supplier and aids dedicated solely to performing Services which, in the normal course of the Services, would be consumed or only have salvage value at the end of the Services period. 13.4 In the event a termination for cause is determined to have been made wrongfully or without cause, then the termination shall be treated as a. termination for convenience, and Consultant shall have no greater rights than it would have had if a termination for convenience had been effected in the first instance. No other loss, cost, Barrage, expense or liability may be claimed, requested or recovered by Consultant. 14. Termination of Agreement for Convenience 14.1 City may terminate performance of the Services under the Agreement in accordance with this Section in whole, or from time to time in part, whenever City shall determine that termination is in City's best interests. Termination shall be effected by City delivering to Consultant, at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the effective date of the termination, a Notice of Termination specifying the extent to which performance of the Services under the Agreement is terminated. 14.2 After receipt of a Notice of Terminatiol, and except as otherwise directed by City, Consultant shall: 14.2.1 Stop Services under the Agreement on the date and to the extent specified in the Notice of Termination; 14.2.2 Place no further orders or subcontracts (including agreements with Subconsultants) for materials, Services, or facilities except as necessary to complete the portion of the Services under the Agreement which is not terminated; 14.2.3 Terminate all orders and subcontracts to the extent that they relate to performance of Services terminated by the Noti,,e of Termination; 14.2.4 Assign to City in the manner, at times, and to the extent directed by City, all right, title, and interest of Consultant under orders and subcontracts so terminated. City shall have 1913-001\2071148.1 the right, in its discretion, to settle or pay any or all claims arising out of termination of orders and subcontracts; 14.2.5 Settle all outstanding liabilities and all claims arising out of such termination of orders and subcontracts, with approval or ratification of City to the extent City may require. City's approval or ratification shall be final for purposes of this clause; 14.2.6 Transfer title and possession to City, and execute all required documents and take all required actions to deliver in the manner, at times, and to the extent, if any, directed by City, completed and uncompleted designs and specifications, Services in process, completed Services, supplies, and other material produced or fabricated as part of, or acquired in connection with performance of, Services terminated by the Notice of Termination (including mockups and model(s)), completed or partially completed plans, drawings, information, in whatever form (i.e., hard -copy and electronic), all intellectual property rights (including without limitation, to the extent applicable, all licenses and copyright, trademark and patent rights) and all other property and property rights which, if the Agreement had been completed, would have been required to be furnished to City; 14.2.7 Use its best efforts to assist City in selling, in the manner, at times, to the extent, and at a price or prices that City directs or authorizes, any property of the types referred to in Section 14.2.6, but Consultant shall not be required to extend credit to any purchaser, and may acquire any such property under conditions prescribed and at a price or prices approved by City. All proceeds from the foregoing shall be applied to reduce payments to be made by City to Consultant under this Agreement, shall otherwise be credited to the price or cost of Services covered by this Agreement or be paid in such other manner as City may direct; 14.2.8 Complete performance of any part of the Services which were not terminated by the Notice of Termination; and 14.2.9 Take such action as may be n.cessary, or as City may direct, for the protection and preservation of property related to this Agreement which is in Consultant's possession and in which City has or may acquire an interest. 14.3 After receiving a Notice of Termination, Consultant shall submit to City a termination claim, in the form and with the certification City prescribes. The claim shall be submitted promptly but in no event later than 3 months from the effective date of the termination, unless one or more extensions in writing are granted by City upon Consultant's written request made within such 3- month period or authorized extension. However, if City determines that facts justify such action, it may receive and act upon any such termination claim at any time after such 3 -month period or extension. If Consultant fails to submit the termination claim within the time allowed, City may determine, on basis of information available to it, the amount, if any, due to Consultant because of the termination. City shall then pay to Consultant the amount so determined. 14.4 Subject to provisions of Section 14.3, Consultant and City may agree upon the whole or part of the amount or amounts to be paid to Consultant because of any termination of Services under this Section. The amount or amounts may include a reasonable allowance for profit on Services done. However, such agreed amount or amoun:s, exclusive of settlement costs, shall not exceed the total Agreement price as reduced by the amount of payments otherwise made and as further reduced by the Agreement price of Services terminated. The Agreement may be amended accordingly, and Consultant shall be paid the agreed amount. 14.5 If Consultant and City fail, under Seclion 14.4, to agree on the whole amount to be paid to Consultant because of termination of Services under this Section, then Consultant's entitlement to G 1913-001\2071148.1 compensation for Services specified in the Agreement which are performed before the effective date of Notice of Termination, shall be the total (without duplication of any items) of — 14.5.1 Reasonable value of Consultant's Services performed prior to Notice of Termination, based on Consultant's entitlement to compensation under Appendix B. Such amount or amounts shall not exceed the total Agreement price as reduced by the amount of payments otherwise made and is further reduced by the Agreement value of Services terminated. Deductions against such amount or amounts shall be made for deficiently performed Services, rework caused by deficiently performed Services, cost of materials to be retained by Consultant, amounts realized by sale of materials, and for other appropriate credits against cost of Services. Such amount or amounts may include profit, but not in excess of 10 percent of Consultant's total costs of performing the Services. 14.5.2 When, in opinion of City, the cost of any item of Services is excessively high due to costs incurred to remedy or replace defective or rejected Services (including having to re- perform Services), reasonable cost to be allowed will be the estimated reasonable cost of performing Services in compliance with the requirements of Agreement and excessive actual cost shall be disallowed. 14.5.3 Reasonable cost to Consultant of handling material returned to vendors, delivered to City or otherwise disposed of as directed by City. 14.6 Except as provided in this Agreement, in no event shall City be liable for costs incurred by Consultant (or Subconsultants) after receipt of a Notice of Termination. Such non - recoverable costs include, but are not limited to, anticipated profits on the Agreement or subcontracts, post - termination employee salaries, post- termination administrative expenses, post- termination overhead or unabsorbed overhead, costs of preparing and submitting claims or proposals, attorney's fees or other costs relating to prosecution of the claim or a lawsuit, pre judgement interest, or any other expense which is not reasonable or authorized under Section 14.5. 14.7 This section shall not prohibit Consultant from recovering costs necessary to discontinue further Services under the Agreement as provided for in Section 14.2 or costs authorized by City to settle claims from Subconsultants. 14.8 In arriving at amount due Consultant under this Section there shall be deducted: 14.8.1 All unliquidated advance or other payments on account theretofore made to Consultant, applicable to the terminated portion of Agreement, 14.8.2 Any substantiated claim which City may have against Consultant in connection with this Agreement, and 14.8.3 The agreed price for, or proceeds of sale of, any materials, supplies, or other things kept by Consultant or sold under the provisions of this Section, and not otherwise recovered by or credited to City. 14.9 If the termination for convenience hereunder is partial, before settlement of the terminated portion of this Agreement, Consultant may file with City a request in writing for equitable adjustment of price or prices specified in the Agreement relating to the portion of this Agreement which is not terminated. City may, but shall not be required to, agree on any such equitable adjustment. Nothing contained herein shall limit the right of City and Consultant to agree upon amount or amounts to be paid to Consultant for completing the continued portion of the Agreement when the 10 1913 -001 \2071148.1 Agreement does not contain an established price for the continued portion. Nothing contained herein shall limit City's rights and remedies at law. 15. Conflicts of Interest /Other Agreements 15.1 Consultant represents that it is familiar with Section 1090 and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California, and that it does not know of any facts that constitute a violation of said sections. 15.2 Consultant represents that it has completely disclosed to City all facts bearing upon any possible interests, direct or indirect, which Consultant believes any member of City, or other officer, agent or employee of City or any department presently has, or will have, in this Agreement, or in the performance thereof, or in any portion of the profits thereunder. Willful failure to make such disclosure, if any, shall constitute ground for termination of this Agreement by City for cause. Consultant agrees to comply with all conflict of interest codes adopted by the City of Cupertino, and its reporting requirements, including without limitation the California Fair Political Practices Act. 15.3 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest, and shall not have any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of Services required under this Agreement. Without limitation, Consultant represents to and agrees with City that Consultant has no present, and will have no future, conflict of interest between providing City the Services hereunder and any interest Consultant may presently have, or will have in the future, with respect to any other person or entity (including but not limited to any federal or state wildlife, environmental or regulatory agency) which has any interest adverse or potentially adverse to City, as determined in the reasonable judgment of City. The provisions of this Section 15 shall remain fully effective indefinitely after termination of Services to City hereunder. 15.4 Consultant represents that neither it nor any of Consultant's employees, officers or agents has any interest, however remote, in any other agreement with City, whether or not such agreement is with Consultant's firm, affiliate firms, or through separate employment, except as expressly itemized below. Failure to disclose such information will result in termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 13 herein. These other agreemi;nts are: None. 16. Proprietary or Confidential Information of City; Publicity 16.1 Consultant acknowledges and agrees that, in the performance of the Services under this Agreement or in the contemplation thereof, Consultant may have access to private or confidential information that may be owned or controlled by City and that such information may contain proprietary or confidential details, the disclosure of which to third parties may be damaging to City. Consultant agrees that all information disclosed by City to or discovered by Consultant shall be held in strict confidence and used only in performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall exercise the same standard of care to pro,:ect such information as a reasonably prudent Consultant would use to protect its own proprietary data, and shall not accept employment adverse to City's interests where such confidential information could be used adversely to City's interests. Consultant agrees to notify City immediately in writing if it is requested to disclose any information made known to or discovered by Consultant during the performance of or in connection with this Agreement. 16.2 Any publicity or press releases with respect to the Project or Services shall be under City's sole discretion and control. Consultant shall not discuss the Services or Project, or matters pertaining thereto, with the public press, representatives of the public media, public bodies or representatives of public bodies, without City's prior written consent. Consultant shall have the right, however, without City's further consent, to include representations of Services among Consultant's 11 1913-001\2071148.1 17. 18. 19. promotional and professional material, and to communicate with persons or public bodies where necessary to perform under this Agreement. 16.3 The provisions of this Section 16 shall remain fully effective indefinitely after termination of Services to City hereunder. Notice to the Parties City and Consultant shall provide notices to the other in the form of a writing, sent by certified mail return receipt requested, or by overnight courier or delivey service with signature required, as follows: City: CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Attn: Glenn Goepfert Consultant: Biggs Cardosa Associates Inc. 1871 The Alameda, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95126 -1752 Attn: Mahvash Harms or to such other place as either party may similarly in writing designate to the other. Notices shall be effective three business days after mailing by certified mail, or upon receipt if delivered by overnight courier or delivery service. Ownership of Results /Work for Hire 18.1 Any interest (including, but not limited to, property interests and copyright interests) of Consultant or its Subconsultants, in drawings, plans, specifications, studies, reports, memoranda, computational sheets or other documents (including but not limited to, electronic media) prepared by Consultant or its Subconsultants in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement shall become the property of and will be transmitted to City at the conclusion of this Agreement. Consultant may, however, retain one copy for its files. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the normal course of the Consultant's activities, Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to reuse its standard construction drawings, details, specifications and other related documents, including the right to retain electronic data or other reproducible copies thereof, and the right to reuse portions or the information contained in them which is incidental to the overall design of the Project. 18.2 Any and all artworks, copy, posters, billboards, photographs, videotapes, audiotapes, systems designs, software, reports, diagrams, surveys, source codes or any original works of authorship created by Consultant or its Subconsultants in connection with Services performed under this Agreement shall be Works for Hire as d .-fined under Title 17 of the United States Code, and all copyrights in such works are the property of City. In the event that it is ever determined that any works created by Consultant or its Subconsultants under this Agreement are not Works for Hire under U.S. law, Consultant hereby assigns to City all copyrights to such works. With the prior written approval of City, Consultant may retain and use copies of such works for reference and as documentation of its experience and capabilities. Audit and Inspection Records 19.1 Consultant shall maintain all drawings, specifications, calculations, cost estimates, quantity takeoffs, statements of construction costs and completion dates, schedules and all correspondence, internal memoranda, papers, writings, electronic media and documents of any sort prepared by or 1? 1913 - 001\2071148.1 furnished to Consultant during the course of performing the Services and providing services with respect to the Project, for a period of at least five years following final completion and acceptance of the Project. All such records (except for materials subject to the attorney client privilege, if any) shall be available to City, and City's authorized agents, officers, and employees, upon request at reasonable times and places. Monthly records of Consultant's personnel costs, Consultant costs, and reimbursable expenses pertaining to both Basic Services, or Additional Services shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis, and shall be available to City, and City's authorized agents, officers, and employees, upon request at reasonable times and places. Consultant shall not destroy any Project records until after advising City and allowing City to accept and store the records. 19.2 Consultant agrees to maintain full and ac.equate records in accordance with City requirements to show actual costs incurred by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement, and to make available to City during business hours accurate ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, cancelled checks, and accounting and other books, records and documents evidencing or relating to all expenditures and disbursements charged to City or relative to Consultant's activities under this Agreement. Consultant will furnish to City, its authorized agents, officers and employees such other evidence or information as City may request with regard to any such expenditure or disbursement charged by Consultant. Consultant will permit City, and City's authorized agents, officers, and employees, to audit, examine and make copies, excerpts and transcripts from such items, and to make audits of all invoices, materials, payrolls, records or personnel and other data related to all other matters covered by this Agreement, whether funded in whole or in part under this Agreement. State and Federal representatives, as appropriate, shall have access to all contract records and the right to audit Consultant and subconsultants. 19.3 Consultant shall maintain all items described in Sections 19.1 and 19.2 above in an accessible location and condition for a period of not less than five years after final completion and acceptance of the Project or until after final audit has been resolved, whichever is later. If such items are not kept and maintained by Consultant within a radius of fifty (50) miles from City's offices in Cupertino, California. Consultant shall, upon City's request and at Consultant's sole cost and expense, make such items available to City, and City's authorized agents, officers, and employees, for inspection at a location within said fifty (50) mile radius, or Consultant shall pay City its reasonable and necessary costs incurred in inspecting Consultant's books and records, including, but not limited to, travel, lodging and subsistence costs. The State of California or any federal agency having an interest in the subject of this Agreement shall have the same rights conferred upon City by this Section. 19.4 The rights and obligations established pursuant to this Section shall be specifically enforceable and survive termination of this Agreement. 20. Subcontracting /Assignment /City Employees 20.1 Consultant and City agree that Consultant's unique talents, knowledge and experience form a basis for this Agreement and that the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement are personal in character. Therefore, Consultant shall not subcontract, assign or delegate any portion of this Agreement or any duties or obligations hereunder unless approved by City in a written instrument executed and approved by City in writing. Neither party shall, on the basis of this Agreement, contract on behalf of or in the name of the other party. Any agreement that violates this Section shall confer no rights on any party and shall be null and void. 20.2 Consultant shall use the subconsultants for the scopes of services listed below and shall not substitute Subconsultants unless approved by written instrument executed and approved by City in writing. All subconsultants shall comply with the terms of this Agreement. Subconsultant Name Scope of Services 1913 - 001\2071148.1 See attached Appendices and Schedules. 20.3 To the extent Consultant is permitted by City in writing to subcontract, assign or subcontract any portion of this Agreement or any duties or obligations hereunder, Subcontractor shall comply with all applicable prompt payment laws and regulations (including, without limitation, California Civil Code, Section 3321. Consultant shall remain fully liable and responsible for all acts and omissions of its Subconsultants in connection with the Services, or the Project, or the Program as if it engaged it the acts and omissions directly. 20.4 Consultant shall not employ or engage, or attempt to employ or engage, any person who is or was employed by City or any department thereof at any time that this Agreement is in effect, during the term of this Agreement and for a period of two years after the termination of this Agreement or the completion of the Services, without the written consent of City. 21. Non - Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment, nor against any Subconsultant or applicant for a subcontract, because of race, color, religious creed, age, sex, actual or perceived sexual orientation, national origin, disability as defined by the ADA (as defined below) or veteran's status. To the extent applicable, Consultant shall comply with all federal, state and local laws (including, without limitation, City ordinances, rules and regulations) regarding non - discrimination, equal employment opportunity, affirmative action and occupational- safety - health concerns, shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations thereunder, and shall comply with same as each may be amended from time to time. 22. Drug -Free Workplace Policy Consultant acknowledges that pursuant to the Federal Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1989, the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited on City premises. Consultant agrees that any violation of this prohibition by Consultant, its employees, agents or assigns shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. 23. Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act Consultant acknowledges that, pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ( "ADA "), programs, services and other activities provided by a public entity to the public, whether directly or through a contractor, must be accessible to the disabled public. Consultant shall provide the Services specified in this Agreement in a manner that complies with the standard of care established under this Agreement regarding the ADA and any and all other applicable federal, state and local disability rights legislation. Consultant agrees not to discriminate against disabled persons in the provision of services, benefits or activities provided under this Agreement and further agrees that any violation of this prohibition on the part of Consultant, its employees, agents or assigns shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 24. Disputes 24.1 Non - Judicial Administrative Claim Settlement Procedure; Government Code Claims. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and City regarding any claim by Consultant for time, money, or additional compensation for any reason whatsoever (including, without limitation, any alleged failure of City to make a decision), Consultant shall submit to the City a written and fully documented administrative claim that sh<LlI provide a narrative of the pertinent events, Consultant's theory of entitlement, pricing calculations and attaches supporting documentation. City will then review Consultant's fully documented administrative claim, conduct an administrative hearing, 14 1913-001\2071148.1 and make a final administrative decision thereon. Pursuant to Government Code, Section 930.2: (i.) Consultant shall initiate this nonjudicial settlement procedure by presenting its administrative claim within 60 days of the first event giving rise to the claim or dispute, (ii.) Consultant's submittal of the administrative claim and City's decision thereon shall be a condition precedent to Consultant thereafter filing a Government Code Claim under the California Government Code, Section 901, et. seq., (iii.) any and all such Government Code Claims presented in connection with this Agreement shall be presented to the City no later than 120 days following completion or termination of this Agreement (whichever is later); (iv.), except as so modified, all other the Government Code requirements remain unchanged. 24.2 Provided that City continues to compensate Consultant in accordance with this Agreement, Consultant shall continue its Services throughout the course of any and all disputes. Nothing in this Agreement shall allow Consultant to discontinue Services during the course of any dispute and Consultant's failure to continue Services during any and all disputes shall be considered a material breach of this Agreement. Consultant agrees that the existence or continued existence of a dispute does not excuse performance under any provision of this Agreement, including without limitation, the time to complete the Services. Consultant also agrees that should Consultant discontinue Services due to a dispute or disputes, City may terminate this Agreement for cause as provided herein. 24.3 In the event of claims exceeding $50,000, as a precondition to litigation, the parties shall first participate in non- binding mediation pursuant to the construction mediation procedures of the American Arbitration Association ( "AAA "), in Cupertino, before a mediator mutually agreeable to the parties, and in the event the parties are unable to agree, selected by a judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court from an approved list of AAA qualified construction mediators. The parties may agree to engage in discovery prior to mediation, but if they do, they shall follow the procedures prescribed in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2019, et. seq. and discovery so conducted shall apply in any subsequent litigation as if conducted in that litigation. If a party other than City refuses to mediate under this Section, then City shall have satisfied its obligations under this Section. 25. Agreement Made in California; Venue 25.1 This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in the City of Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. The formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules. Each party hereby waives its rights under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394 to file a motion to transfer any action or proceeding arising out of this Agreement to another venue. 25.2 The exclusive venue for all litigation relative to the formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be in Santa Clara County, California. 26. Compliance with Laws 26.1 Consultant represents that it will comply with all applicable laws in the performance of the Services, regardless of whether such laws are specifically stated in this Agreement and regardless of whether such laws are in effect on th,,- date hereof. Consultant shall comply with all security requirements imposed by authorities with jurisdiction over the Project and /or Program (including without limitation, the California Department of Transportation, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and other government agencies), and will provide all information, work histories and /or verifications as requested by such authorities for security clearances or compliance. 26.2 Consultant further represents that it shall exercise due professional care to prepare all plans, drawings, specifications, designs and any other product of the Services to comply with all applicable laws, codes and regulations, consistent with the standard of care in this Agreement. 1 `> 1913-001\2071148.1 27. Construction All section and paragraph captions are for reference only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement. If Consultant consists of more than one party (such as, for example, a joint venture of two corporations), each signatory party for Consultant shall have joint and several responsibility and liability to perform the terms of this Agreement. 28. Miscellaneous 28.1 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures to act by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run on the date of issuance by City of the final Certificate for Payment, or termination of this Agreement, whichever is earlier. 28.2 Any provisions or portion thereof of 1:his Agreement, which is prohibited by, unlawful or unenforceable under any applicable law of any jurisdiction, shall as to such jurisdiction be ineffective without affecting other provisions of this Agreement. If the provisions of such applicable law may be waived, they are hereby waived to the end that this Agreement may be deemed to be a valid and binding agreement enforceable in accordance with its terms. If any provisions or portion thereof of this Agreement are prohibited by, unlawful, or unenforceable under any applicable law and are therefore stricken or deemed waived, the remainder of such provisions and this Agreement shall be interpreted to achieve the goals or intent of the stricken or waived provisions or portions thereof to the extent such interpretation is consistent with applicable law. 28.3 Either party's waiver of any breach, or the omission or failure of either party, at any time, to enforce any right reserved to it, or to require performance of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or other provisions of this Agreement, including without limitation, the timing of any such performance, shall not be a waiver of any other right to which any party is entitled, and shall not in any way affect, limit, modify or waive that party's right thereafter to enforce or compel strict compliance with every term, covenant, condition or other provision hereof, any course of dealing or custom of the trade or oral representations notwithstanding. 28.4 The parties shall execute four originals of this Agreement. 29. Entire Agreement; Modifications of Agreement 29.1 The Agreement, and any written modification to the Agreement, shall represent the entire and integrated Agreement between the parties hereto regarding the subject matter of this Agreement and shall constitute the exclusive statement of the terms of the parties' Agreement. The Agreement, and any written modification to the Agreement, shall supersede any and all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral, express or implied, that relate in any way to the subject matter of this Agreement or written modification, and the parties represent and agree that they are entering into this Agreement and any subsequent written modification in sole reliance upon the information set forth in the Agreement or written modification and the parties are not and will not rely on any other information. All prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral, express or implied, that relate in any way to the subject matter of this Agreement, shall not be admissible or referred to hereafter in the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. 29.2 Consultant, in any price proposals for changes in the Services that increase the Agreement amount, or for any additional Services, shall br .-ak out and list its costs and use percentage markups. 16 1913-001\2071148.1 Consultant shall require its Subconsultants (if any) to do the same, and the Subconsultants' price proposals shall accompany Consultant's price proposals. 29.3 Consultant and its Subconsultants shall, upon request by City, permit inspection of all original unaltered Agreement bid estimates, subcontract Agreements, purchase orders relating to any change, and documents substantiating all costs associated with all cost proposals. 29.4 Changes in the Services made pursuant to this Section and extensions of the Agreement time necessary by reason thereof shall not in any way release Consultant's representations and agreements pursuant to this Agreement. 29.5 This Agreement may not be modified, nor may compliance with any of its terms be waived, except by written instrument executed and approved by a fully authorized representative of City expressing such an intention. 29.6 Whenever the words "as directed ", "as required ", "as permitted ", or words of like effect are used, it shall be understood as the direction, requirement, or permission of City. The words "approval ", "acceptable ", "satisfactory", or words of dike import, shall mean approved by, or acceptable to, or satisfactory to City, unless otherwise indicated by the context. 29.7 Consultant shall comply with any requirements of any funding sources, as requested by City from time to time. To the extent such cooperation is not already required by this Agreement, City shall compensate Consultant for its costs of compliance as Additional Services. 30. Survival of Certain Provisions. Except as otherwise separately and expressly provided by the parties in writing, Sections 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement, and any completion of the Services. 17 1913-001\2071148.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day first mentioned above. "City" CITY OF C PERTINO, David W. KnapV, eity Manager Attest: Kimberley Smith Pty Clerk "Consultant" BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Its: Approved as to form 1 Ii this 104 day of t�c! 7-e BE2 , 2003. Charles Kililrn,4ti nsel City Resolution No. 03 -082 THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE VALID OR EFFECTIVE FOR ANY PURPOSE UNLESS AND UNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY COUNSEL. 18 1913-001\2071148.1 LIST OF APPENDICES AND SCHEDULES Appendix A Scope of Services Appendix B Payments to Consultant Appendix C Insurance Schedule 6.2 Professional Personnel (including resumes) APPENDIX B — PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT This is an appendix attached to, and made a part of, the Professional Services Agreement dated ( "Agreement ") between THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, ( "City "), and BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ( "Consultant "), for the provision of professional services ( "Services "). 1. Basic Services. City will pay Consultant for Basic Services, a maximum compensation of $1,300,000.00 ( "Contract Price "), which sum includes costs for reimbursable expenses as identified below. Such payment shall be full compensation for all Basic Services required, performed or accepted under this Agreement. If City and Consultant previously executed a purchase order for services within the scope of the Services of this Agreement, then the services performed and the compensation paid under that purchase order shall be subject to the terms of this Agmement and the previous payments deemed payments against the Contract Price established in this Appendix 2. Work Breakdown Structure. To assist City in determining progress payments, Consultant shall provide City with an itemization of its fee under this Agreement. Consultant shall define all project tasks, deliver a project schedule defining the time line for each task, deliver a project budget defining the planned man -hours and costs for each task, and a schedule of deliverables defining each deliverable to be provided to City. The Consultant shall further define which tasks are to be performed by each sub - consultant. (The project tasks are defined in Appendix A attached hereto. The planned man -hours for all tasks and schedules of direct costs appear in this Appendix. The project schedule that will provide a further breakdown of costs and schedule of deliverables will be delivered by Consultant according to Task 1.8 shown in Appendix A.1 3. Payment Schedule. Once the retainer is e;chausted, Progress payments for Basic Services for each phase of the work shall be made as follows: by City ❑ upon completion of work X❑ monthly based upon Consultant's percentage completion of the Services as determined ❑ as set forth in the attached schedule 4. Additional Services. City will pay the Consultant for Additional Services beyond those noted in Section 1, "Basic Services," above, as agreed to in a written addendum or amendment ( "amendment ") to this Agreement executed by City and the Consultant. Payment for all such Additional Services shall be in an amount and upon the terms set out in such amendir.ent. Each such amendment shall provide for a fixed price; or, where payment for such Additional Services is to be on an hourly basis, for a maximum amount plus Costs and Reimbursables. Each amendment sha; l also provide for a method of payment (i.e., partial payments or lump sum) and whether it will be based upon percentage of completion or for services billed. Amendments must be negotiated and signed by the Consultant and City prior to commencing work of Additional Services; otherwise, such costs are deemed within Basic Services. 5. Invoices. All payments shall require a written invoice from Consultant in a form acceptable to City. City shall make payment on approved amounts within each invoice within 30 days of receipt. APPENDIX "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES MARY AVENUE BICYCLE CORRIDOR CITY OF CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA This is an appendix attached to, and made a part of, the Agreement dated Vie %, 1'7 ,70e),3 THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ( "City ") and Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. ( "Consultant" ) for the provision of professional services ( "Services"). TABLE OF CONTENT A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. ..............................2 B. CONSTRUCTION BUDGET ......................................................................... ..............................2 C. CRITERIA GOVERNING CONSULTANT "S SERVICE ............................. ..............................3 D. ADMINISTRATIVE, COORDINATION, REPORTING AND SCHEDULING SERVICES ....3 E. ADA ................................................................................................................. ..............................5 F. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ............................................................ ..............................5 G. DESIGN STANDARDS .................................................................................. ..............................5 H. DETAILED WORK PLAN AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................ ..............................5 1.0 TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ................................................ ..............................6 2.0 TASK 2. PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS .... ..............................8 3.0 TASK 3. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ( 35%) ............................. .............................19 4.0 TASK 4. FINAL DESIGN - UNCHEC KED ........................................ .............................29 5.0 TASK 5. FINAL PS &Q - CHECKED (95 %) < BCA/ HNTB> ............ .............................31 6.0 TASK 6. FINAL PS &E (100 %) < BC. A/ HNTB> ................................. .............................34 7.0 TASK 7. CONSTRUCTION BIDDING SERVICES ......................... .............................36 8.0 TASK 8. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES (Not in Contract Amendment) .........36 9.0 TASK 9. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (Not in Contract) ...............37 10.0 TASK 10. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES (Not in Contract) ..................40 LISTOF ANTICIPATED SHEET ......................................................................... .............................41 A -1 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Cupertino ( "City ") has undertaken a project to provide a bicycle and pedestrian connection between the cities of Cupertino and Sunnyvale in a corridor on Mary Avenue between Homestead Road and Meteor Avenue. The corridor passes over Interstate 280, utilizing the existing right -of -way designated for Mary Avenue. The project will include a bicycle path with landscaping and a bridge over Interstate 280. The City has approved a project Feasibility Study Final Report, dated December 3, 2001. The report presents a preferred design for the corridor based upon the input from community workshops. The corridor features a suspension bridge over Interstate 280 with a main span of about 300 -feet and a total length of about 460 -feet. The approaches to the bridge will utilize the existing fill slopes placed for a future extension of Mary Avenue over Interstate 280. The final report shows pathway alignments and landscaping; details preferred by the residents to mitigate their privacy and security concerns. This final report is to be used as design guidance for the Preliminary Engineering and Final Design scope of services. This scope of services will provide for preliminary engineering and environmental documentation of the project and final design of the project, resulting in a set of Plans, Specifications and Estimate for construction. Construction engineering support services will be provided by Consultant, but is treated as an optional task in this scope of services. The preliminary engineering phase consists generally of surveying, geotechnical field investigations and reports, bridge type selection and design, pathway design refinements, environmental clearance, public information meetings, drainage design, utility identification and preparation of permit applications. Preliminary engineering will be consistent with the concepts provided in the prior approved feasibility study final report. The final design phase will consist of incorporation of all City /Caltrans review comments into the plans, and submittal of the approved PS &E construction documents for advertising. B. CONSTRUCTION BUDGET Bid Day Budget: The preliminary budget for construction costs of work to be designed by the Consultant is Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00). City's "Bid Day Budget" referenced means the anticipated value of the construction contract for the Project when initially let for the base contract work, exclusive of alternates. Consultant shall treat City's identified budget(s) as City's required construction cost for the Project. Consultant's design contingency budgets are specifically described in this Agreement. In performing its Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall not rely upon or refer to any other City contingency budgets either for design, construction, or any items within those contingency budgets, nor shall any such contingency budgets be referred to in determining performance under this Agreement. A -2 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 K:] C. CRITERIA GOVERNING CONSULTANT'S SERVICE Consultant shall not, unless otherwise permitted in writing by City, propose or recommend any design that has the effect of shifting design responsibilities from Consultant to a contractor, through performance specifications or any other means. Performance specifications will be allowed only when necessary to preclude single vendor sources. 2. Consultant shall not, unless otherwise permitted in writing by City, specify unique, innovative, proprietary or sole source equipment, systems or materials. Whenever a proprietary or sole source design or equipment is requested by Consultant, Consultant shall provide City with a written evaluation of whether all periodic maintenance and replacement of parts, equipment or systems, can be performed normally and without excessive cost or time. City will consider such evaluation in making in decision. D. ADMINISTRATIVE, COORDINATION, REPORTING AND SCHEDULING SERVICES General Description and Requirements. 1.1 Performance of Services will require Consultant to work with, meet with, and attend meetings with City staff, with other governmental agencies, with Contractors, and with such other consultants as Consultant determines necessary, to the extent necessary for the design and construction of the Project and performance of Consultant's duties; under this Agreement (including, but not limited to, Consultant's express duties of coordination with other consultants). 1.2 Plans, specifications, design calculations, site data, and cost estimates, if any, required to be prepared by Consultant shall be prepared by licensed personnel or personnel under the direction of licensed personnel. As required by the California Code of Regulations, "Responsible Charge" for such Services shall be with a Registered licensed Engineer in the State of California. 1.3 Consultant shall provide to City all professional architectural and engineering services necessary to perform the Services. Services will include, without limitation, providing all professional architectural and engineering services necessary to perform the Services and complete the Project, including civil, traffic, electrical, architectural, structural engineering, soil's engineering, landscape, and cost estimating services required to perform the Services and complete the Project. 1.4 Consultant shall have adequate personnel, facilities, equipment and supplies to complete Consultant's Services. Consultant shall provide all materials required to complete its services at its sole cost and expense. A -3 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 : •1 1.5 Consultant shall engage all appropriate specialty subconsultants as are necessary for proper completion of Consultant's Services, at the sole expense of Consultant. Consultant's contracts with its Subconsultants (and their contracts with their subconsultants) shall incorporate this Agreement by reference to the extent not inconsistent with the Subconsultant's scope of work. City shall have the right (but not the obligation) to approve specialty subconsultants engaged by Consultant as well as their form of contract, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 1.6 Consultant shall require each of its subconsultants to execute agreements containing standard of care and indemnity provisions coextensive with those in this Agreement and which will indemnify and hold City harmless from any negligent errors or omissions of th.- subconsultants. 1.7 To the extent necessary to complete its design services for the Project, Consultant shall independently review, update and verify all as -built and existing conditions, and all as -built information supplied by City concerning existing structures, facilities and utilities as outlined in the scope of services. 1.8 Throughout Consultant's performance of the Services, Consultant shall make written recommendations to City concerning any additional information necessary to complete the Services. 1.9 Consultant shall provide City with written evaluations of the effect of any and all governmental and private regulations, licenses, patents, permits, and any other type of applicable restriction and associated requirements on the Services and its incorporation into the Project. 1.10 Consultant shall provide City with a copy of all written communications and submittals to third parties regarding the Project (excluding attorney - client privileged communications). 2. Coordination of Services With Consultant's Subconsultants and With Consultants on Other Projects. 2.1 Consultant shall mutually coordinate all architectural and engineering disciplines and subconsultants involved in completing its Services. The objective of this coordination shall be the development of a complete, comprehensive and workable design for the Project with consistency in architecture and thematic details with other projects, and in which the work of Consultant and other consultants interface well and is properly coordinated, is architecturally sound and well engineered, with details that work together with regard to all affected disciplines. City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to attend and participate in such meetings, and to remain A -4 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA fully advised and informed of the coordination of design work and the performance of each subconsultant of their design responsibilities. 2.1.1 Consultant shall require its subconsultants to agree in their subcontracts to coordinate with Consultant and other subconsultants. 2.1.2 Consultant shall conduct at least monthly design coordination meetings with all subconsultants employed by Consultant. F,_ ADA Consultant's scope of Services on the Project shall include ADA compliance. F. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. Consultant shall coordinate, schedule and take all actions necessary to perform the Services in a manner that complies with all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ( "CEQA ") and any other statutory or regulatory requirements as to environmental issues or compliance applicable to City on the Projects. Consultant shall not be responsible to prepare CEQA compliance documents, but shall prepare its designs in conformance with CEQA compliance documents and required timeframes. G. DESIGN STANDARDS Roadway tie -ins, bicycle path and bridge design shall conform to the applicable provisions and guidelines of the current editions of the following: • AASHTO Policy on the Geometric Design of Roads • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications • Caltrans Bridge Design Specifications • Caltrans Bridge Memos to Designers • Caltrans Bridge Design Aids Manual • Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual • Caltrans Drafting and Plans Manual • Caltrans Highway Design Manual • Accessibility standards adopted under the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) All plans, specifications, estimates, and reports shall be prepared in Metric units. H. DETAILED WORK PLAN AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The Scope of Services is divided into nine tasks, numbered 1 through 9, which are summarized below. Submittals shall be made in the number and type specified in the current edition of the CALTRANS publication entitled Guide for the Submittal of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates, A -5 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA and where applicable, EFPB Information and Procedures Guide of the Division of Structures, unless noted otherwise. TASK 1. Project Management TASK 2. Planning and Preliminary Investigations /GAD, Environmental Studies, Environmental Document, Project Study Report and Project Report TASK 3. Preliminary Engineering and Preliminary design (35 %) for General Plan Submittals and Bridge Type Selection Meeting TASK 4. Final Design - Unchecked (65 %) TASK 5. Final PS &Q - Checked (95 %) with Cost Estimate TASK 6. Final PS &E (100 %) with Cost Estimate TASK 7. Construction Bidding Services TASK 8. Construction Phase Services ( /amendment) TASK 9. Construction Management Services (Amendment) TASK 10. Construction Inspection Services (Amendment) Note: Tasks that are not applicable to this project are identified by (N /A). 1.0 TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT will provide project management for each task for the entire duration of the project schedule. The design documents shall be bid - ready, and constructable in accordance with CALTRANS' approved standards. Management activities shall consist of administration, coordination, attending meetings and quality control as stated in the following: 1.1 Supervise, coordinate and monitor planning and design for conformance with CALTRANS' standards and policies. 1.2 Prior to start of any work, CONSULTANT shall interface with CALTRANS' Project Development and the Division of Structures to assure format consistency of all deliverables. A -6 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 I. 1.3 Assure compliance with other codes and standards as acceptable to CALTRANS and approved by VTA and the City. For example, the use of City standards for arterials and local roads outside Caltrans Right -of -Way (ROW). 1.4 Maintain Project files in accordance with CALTRANS' Uniform Filing System and, when applicable, to CALTRANS' Bridge Memo to Designers. 1.5 Not perform any extra work without prior written authorization from the City. 1.6 Assure that all documents requiring CALTRANS' oversight review are prepared in accordance with CALTRANS' standards, guidelines, and procedures. 1.7 Coordinate the planning and design effort with all team members, including Consultants, subconsultants and the following: • City of Cupertino • VTA • CALTRANS (All Offices, Departments, Divisions and Groups as directed by CALTRANS Project Development and if applicable by CALTRANS DOS). • Utility Companies. • County, cities, regulatory agencies and private property owners. 1.8 Prepare a detailed Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule within one month after Notice to Proceed for the entire project. Update the Project CPM schedule on a monthly basis and submit an electronic file at the end of each month. Also, prepare, update, and submit a Two -Month Horizon Schedule at the regular monthly design coordination meetings (Trend Meetings). 1.9 Attend meetings such as: • Regular monthly planning and design coordination meetings (Trend Meetings). • Two (2) Stakeholder Working Group (SWG)meetings with CALTRANS and other agencies to resolve issues. • Community Meetings; participate in two (2) community meetings concerning the project. Furnish plans, handouts, and make presentations describing the project. • Council Meeting; appear at on,,- (1) Cupertino City Council meeting for award of the contract. Furnish plans, handouts, make presentations, and answer questions related to the project. 1.10 Prepare and submit budgets, monthly progress and performance reports, and invoices. 1.11 Prepare and submit correspondence and memos including all meeting minutes. A -7 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 FIRM, 1.12 Maintain project design files in accordance with CALTRANS Bridge memo to Designers and, where applicable, to the Uniform Filing System. 1.13 Establish and implement a quality control procedure for planning and design activities, perform in -house quality control reviews for each task, and submit deliverables to the City for review in accordance with the approved schedule. 1.14 Coordinate work to assure quality, accuracy and consistency of all documents. 1.15 Conduct all regular monthly planning and design coordination meetings (Trend meetings). Required activities include but are not limited to the following: • Preparation and submittal of agenda for the trend meetings. • Preparation and submittal of a two -month horizon schedule for work to be performed by the CONSULTANT and his subconsultants. • Preparation and submittal of status of submittals register. • Log of permits required for the project. • Compile a data request log of information requested by and provided to others. • Preparation of meeting minutes for each Trend Meeting. 1.16 All final drawings, specifications and other documents submitted by CONSULTANT must be compatible, readable and useable by Caltrans Headquarters and District computer software and hardware systems. 2.0 TASK 2. PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS Task 2 shall consist of compiling and reviewing existing data pertinent to the Project, planning phase activities, identifying and requesting supplemental information and surveys, and establishing coordination with any adjacent projects, and obtaining information and requirements for utilities, right -of -way, permits and geotechnical. CONSULTANT activities shall include, but are not limited to the following: 2.1 Data Collection and Review CONSULTANT shall obtain and review available data and information necessary for planning and designing the Project. This information may be obtained from the City, VTA, CALTRANS, local agencies, utilities, and other agencies and organizations. Data to be reviewed includes the following: • Any previous report(s) or documents related to the proposed project area • As -built plans • Utility information • Aerial photos and any available mapping, including digitized topography • Survey control data • Preliminary Layout Plans A -8 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA • Layout Line Alignment • Right -of -way information • Pertinent historical correspondence • Approximate retaining wall and sound wall locations • Bridge Maintenance Reports • Pavement structural cross - sections, when available 2.2 Concept Alternatives and Design Workshops CONSULTANT shall conduct two (2) design workshops with the City and Caltrans. The workshops will be as follows: Workshop 1: Meet with the City and Caltrans to review the current alternatives (concept sketches) and alternative selection matrix for the project. During the workshop, additional concepts will be developed and discussed. At the conclusion of the workshop, two ('2) cable- supported structure alternatives will be chosen to be further developed into concept sketches (to the same level of effort that the current alternatives have been developed). The alignment of the pathway and landscaping design will also be discussed and developed. Workshop 2: Within two (2) weeks, a second workshop will be held. The two (2) structure alternatives, along with an accompanying pathway and landscaping design, will be reviewed and discussed. During the workshop, one (1) alternative will be chosen as the preferred cable - supported structure alternative. Once chosen, details will be discussed and developed. The resulting alternative will be developed for Type Selection and ;included in the combination Project Study Report/Project Report. A standard cast -in -place concrete box alternative will be developed and included in the combination Project Study Report/Project Report, if required by Caltrans. 2.3 Combined Project Study Report (PSR) / Project Report (PR) CONSULTANT shall prepare a Combined Project Study Report/Project Report (PSR/PR) in accordance with Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual and shall include the following information for the work to be performed in the Caltrans right -of -way and any other information currently required by Caltrans criteria: • Cover Sheet • Applicant Portion • Caltrans Portion • Proposal • Existing Facilities • Deficiencies A -9 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 RIM • Environmental Status • Traffic and Accident Data • Traffic Signals <none required> • Non Standard Features • Impact on Railroads <none required> • Impact on Utilities • Structures • Highway Planting <minor restoration required> • Permits • Right of Way Required • Hazardous Materials • Remarks • All attachments as required for combined PSR/PR • Appropriate Maps • Typical cross sections • Appropriate environmental documentation • PR Cost Estimate • Cooperative Agreement • Right of Way Data Sheet • Initial Site Assessment CONTRACTOR shall submit required copies to Caltrans, VTA and City for review. After review comments are received, a final PSR/PR shall be prepared and submitted to Caltrans for signatures. 2.4 Environmental Documents City of Cupertino has the Initial Study that led to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration by the City Council on November 18, 2002. [Prior to City Council action, the City's Planning; Commission had reviewed the project and had recommended approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.] The Initial Study was prepared on the project's Feasibility Study, the environmental analysis that occurred addressed the impacts of project. While a detailed design was not available at that time, there was sufficient information to address aesthetics, geology, noise, cultural resources, etc. Consultant believes that the City has legally complied with CEQA for this project and the majority of the following environment scope of work is not applicable to this project. 2.4.1 Attend Field Review (N /A) A -10 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA CONSULTANT will attend and participate in a field review of the site with the project team and Caltrans staff. 2.4.2 Preparation of Draft Initial Study (N /A) CONSULTANT will prepare an updated Initial Study (IS), which will evaluate the proposed bridge project. The IS will describe the existing environmental setting and include the CEQA Checklist. An analysis of the potential impacts resulting from the proposed project will be included in the IS. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. (In the event that the Initial Study identifies significant impacts of the project that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, an EIR would be required. Preparation of an EIR is not included as part of this scope of work). The IS will be consistent with the CEQA Guidelines and will include the following sections and appropriate environmental analysis. Background and Project Description The Initial Study will include relevant background information on the project site, and a general description of the proposed bridge improvements. Maps, tables, and appropriate graphics will be included to describe the characteristics of the project. The project description will also discuss the project objectives and will include a section describing the consistency of the project with relevant federal, state and local plans. Environmental Setting The Initial Study will include an overview of the environmental setting of the project site area, including a description of the existing and surrounding land uses, as well as the local geologic, drainage and flooding, hazardous materials, biological, cultural resource, noise, utilities and services, and visual conditions. Environmental Checklist The Initial Study will include the CEQA Environmental Checklist. The checklist will be used to identify potentially significant impacts resulting from development of the proposed project. Discussion of Significant .Environmental Effects The Initial Study will include a discussion of potentially significant environmental effects that will result from the proposed bridge project. A -11 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 C While the Initial Study will address all issues in the checklist as necessary, it is presently anticipated that substantial discussion will be necessary in the areas of land use, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, hazardous materials, biological resources, cultural resources, noise, visual and elevated views impacts, public services, utilities, and construction impacts. Land Use The Initial Study will describe the historical and existing land uses in the project area, and will describe the project's consistency with adopted plans and policies. The Initial Study will describe potential constraints to development posed by the existing conditions in the area. The Initial Study will also identify potential land use impacts and conflicts that could result to the various project components from nearby land uses, as well as potential impacts upon nearby land uses resulting from the project. Mitigation measures will be identified, as necessary, for significant land use impacts. Geology and Soils The Initial Study will address the potential geologic impacts from construction of the proposed bridge, based upon available geotechnical information. Mitigation measures will be identified to minimize potentially significant geologic impacts, if necessary. Hydrology and Water Quality The Initial Study will describe the change in hydrological conditions resulting from the project. Construction of the proposed bridge could cause erosion and sedimentation into nearby storm drains and waterways. The potential project impacts to water quality will be described in the Initial Study. Mitigation measures will be identified for potentially significant water quality impacts, as necessary. Hazardous Materials The Initial Study will describe the potential for existing hazardous materials contamination to be present in the project area. This will include a database search by Environmental Data Resources for the purpose of determining whether or not there are recorded sites with known/suspected contamination in the project area. (It should be noted that this scope does not include the completion of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.) A -12 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 Biological Resources The Initial Study will describe the potential for the bridge project to result in impacts to biological resources that could be present on the project site. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce or avoid significant impacts, if warranted. Cultural Resources The potential impacts of the project upon cultural resources that could be present at the site will be evaluated. An Archaeological Survey Report and a Historic Property Survey Report will be prepared at the site of the bridge. These reports will be prepared in the required Caltrans/FHWA formats to address the provisions of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This scope assumes that these reports will not turn up any resources of significance within the construction impact zone. This task will be completed by our subconsultant, Basin Research Associates. Noise The Initial Study will describe the existing noise environment and major noise sources in the project area, and will assess the noise impacts of the project. Permanent and periodic project noise increases, both direct and indirect, will be addressed, and any impacts upon nearby sensitive receptors will be evaluated. Construction- related noise impacts upon adjacent residential neighborhoods and sensitive receptors will also be evaluated. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce significant noise impacts upon sensitive receptors, as necessary. Visual and Aesthetic Impacts The Initial Study will describe the existing visual character of the project site area and the projected change in visual character resulting from development of the proposed bridge. The Initial Study will include photo simulations of the proposed bridge, if available from the City and /or the project team, to illustrate views of the bridge from surrounding uses and from Interstate 280. The hiitial Study will identify the potential for the project to provide areas with elevated views into residential homes or backyards, and will evaluate the need for design changes or screening. The Initial Study will also describe the proposed night lighting on the bridge, and will evaluate the potential for light and glare to impact surrounding land uses as well as drivers on Interstate 280. Mitigation A -13 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA measures will be identified to reduce or avoid any significant visual impacts of the project, if necessary. Public Services The project will create additional areas that will need to be patrolled by the Sheriff's Department and potentially accessed by the Fire Department. The Initial Study will describe the existing conditions and the project's potential impacts upon police and fire /ambulance services, as well as the ability and capacity of the service providers to serve the proposed bridge, bridge approaches, and sun•ounding areas. The Initial Study will also describe potential impacts upon schools, particularly Homestead High School, of the bridge project. Utilities and Services The Initial Study will describe the existing and planned gas, electric, telephone, and cable services to the project area. The Initial Study will address potential impacts to these services, specifically as they relate to infrastructure requirements, facilities, and capacity. The Initial Study will also address potential impacts to the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) channel located adjacent to the freeway. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce significant impacts, if warranted. Construction Impacts Potential construction impacts of the proposed project will be addressed in the Initial Study, including construction noise, traffic and air quality. The Initial Study will also address the potential for temporary impacts upon adjacent land uses resulting from construction of the proposed bridge improvements. Considering the, construction staging and scheduling mitigation measures will be identified to reduce or avoid potentially significant impacts. Other Issues The Initial Study will also address the following issues: Air Quality Recreation Mineral Resources Transportation/Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance Reproduction and Delivery of Administrative Draft Initial Study A -14 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 Consultant will prepare a total of five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft IS. These copies will be submitted to the City staff for review and comment. Preparation of the Draft Initial Study The Administrative Draft IS will be revised, based upon the comments received from the City and Consultant. Upon approval by the City Staff, the document will constitute the Draft IS and up to fifty (50) copies will be printed and delivered to the City for public review and circulation, as required by CEQA. If requested by the City, an electronic disk or email version of the Draft IS will also be provided to the City. 2.4.3 Preparation of Final Initial Study (N /A) Consultant will respond to ;substantial comments received on the Draft IS during the public review period, and will make any necessary changes to the Initial Study, based upon the comments received. Up to ten (10) copies of the Final IS will be submitted to the City. If requested by the City, an electronic disk or email version of the Final Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration will also be provided to the City. 2.4.4 Environmental Information for PSR/PR Assuming that CEQA is complete Consultant's role will be limited to providing information for the PSR/PR document using the documents prepared under Feasibility Study Phase. 2.4.5 Permits This scope of work assumes that Consultant staff will prepare the applications for the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) and Caltrans permits for the project and will assist City with their processing with these agencies. It is not anticipated at this time that the proposed project would require regulatory permits from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). If it is determined that the project would require permits from these agencies, we would complete the permit applications and coordinate; their processing with the agencies. 2.4.6 Environmental Mitigation — Mitigation measures that are lighting impact and additional geotechnical studies shall be incorporated into the PS &E. A -15 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 2.5 Coordination with Others Coordination shall be performed for each task among all project members, including subconsultants and other consultants. Coordination also includes, but is not limited to, the following agencies: • City of Cupertino • VTA and its consultants • CALTRANS (All offices, Departments, Divisions and Groups as directed by CALTRANS Project Development including CALTRANS DOS) • Federal Highway Administration SCVWD (FHWA) • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Santa Clara Valley Water District • Utility companies • Department of Fish and Game • Department of Parks and Recreation • City and County Agencies • Private Property Owners 2.6 Permits CONSULTANT shall be responsible to perform all activities to identify and assist City to procure permits required to construct Mary Avenue Bicycle Corridor Project. CONSULTANT shall identify all permits required to construct this Project based on consultation with CALTRANS' Project Development, and Division of Structures staff. CONSULTANT shall meet CALTRANS' permit requirements specified in current editions of the PS &E Guide and the Division of Structures EFPB Information and .Procedures Guide. CONSULTANT shall assure that requirements of all attachments and exhibits are fully understood and that all applicable conditions identified in the permits are met. Environmental permits are discussed in the Environmental Documents section. 2.7 Structure General Plan Type Selection General Plan shall be included in PSR/PR. Refer to Task 3 Scope of Work. A -16 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 :60 2.8 Traffic Modeling and nd Operations Analysis Shall consist of completing the traffic engineering analyses needed to design the project. CONSULTANT activities shall include, but are not limited to the following: 2.8.1 Traffic Forecasting and Modelin CONSULTANT will review and update, if necessary, previous forecasts of pedestrian and bicycle volumes projected for the new structure and any associated reduction in vehicular traffic on the adjacent roadways. 2.8.2 Traffic Element of the Proi ,-ct Study Report/ Project Report and Environmental Documents CONSULTANT will prepare the traffic element for inclusion in the Project Study Report/ Project Report, Noise Study, and Environmental Documents. 2.8.3 Traffic Operation Design Review CONSULTANT will provide input regarding the design of the bridge connections to existing sidewalks, bicycle facilities, and roadways. CONSULTANT shall assess the connections in order to minimize conflict between vehicular traffic and bridge users. CONSULTANT will provide recommendations in terms of the traffic control devices required to provide adequate access for pedestrians and bicyclists using the bridge. No roadway or signal modifications are anticipated for either the intersection of Mary Avenue and Homestead Road at the north end or the terminus between the bicycle /pedestrian path and Mary Avenue at the south end. 2.9 Stage Construction and Traffic Handling CONSULTANT shall prepare traffic handling recommendations indicating the sequence of construction activities proposed to optimize both maintenance of traffic flow, efficiency of construction work, throwaway costs, and acceptability to public. CONSULTANT shall prepare a schedule of construction activities related to the traffic handling and stage construction. 2.10 Prepare Topographic Mapping CONSULTANT shall prepare topographic base mapping in accordance with current Caltrans procedures and requirements. Activities performed shall include horizontal and vertical ground control survey, aero- triangulation analysis, A -17 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 MW preparation and delivery of topographic mapping, development of base mapping and field verification of mapped features. 2.11 Design Surveys and Survey Control Data The City shall prepare and process encroachment permits necessary for fieldwork. 2.11.1 Control Line Survey Perform field survey to locate existing monuments and controls necessary to reestablish existing control lines and convert to NAD 1983 and tie to approved Caltrans monumentation. Field survey shall be based on Second Order Accuracy Controls established through GPS Survey. 2.11.2 Hardcopy Survey of Control Line Prepare hardcopy survey map of the control lines. Hardcopy survey format shall conform to Caltrans' standard for R/W Engineering Local Public Agency Coordination Booklet, dated September 1999 and Survey Standards for Special Funded Projects, dated December 1994. Hardcopy survey shall depict monuments and control points surveyed and survey adjustments required to reestablish existing control and new control line for design purposes. Hardcopy for control lines shall depict existing right of way (graphically only). CONSULTANT shall perpetuate the existing monumentation that may be expected to be disturbed during construction per section 8771(b) of Business & Profession Code. 2.11.3 Potholing (Not in Contract) CONSULTANT shall determine those utilities that need to be potholed within project limits. Utilities shall be potholed, reference surveyed and plotted by the CONSULTANT Actual potholing shall be performed by the City. 2.11.4 Topographic Design Surveys Field surveys for design should include additional surveys necessary to confirm mapping accuracy, topographic surveys necessary to complete design, including but not limited to cross sections, verifying utilities and drainage facilities, pavement elevations and locations, potholing, conforms, vertical clearanc: s, obstructions, tree survey locations, lighting fixtures, fences, retaining walls, soundwalls, drainage swales and ditches and any other features necessary to complete the design. A -18 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 2.12 Submittals CONSULTANT shall perform in -house quality control review and submit the following Project documents: • Concept Drawings • Topographic Mapping • Hardcopy Map • Draft PSR/PR and Final PSR/F'R with attachments and technical reports • Permit Requirements Memorandum 3.0 TASK 3. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (35 %) The purpose of Task 3, Preliminary Engineering, is to complete preliminary bridge design, finalize bridge layout and path geometrics, establish and /or confirm requirements for right -of -way, utilities easements, construction quantities, cost estimates and permit requirements for the Project, including highway and structures. CONSULTANT shall study various design elements for value engineering opportunities, addressing those elements where it may appear that significant cost savings or other advantages can be realized. CONSULTANT activities shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 3.1 Fact Sheets (N /A) CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit combined Fact Sheets summarizing known mandatory and advisory design exceptions for deviations from Caltrans' standards and policies prior to commencing any detailed design work. Additional design exceptions, if discovered, shall be submitted as supplemental Fact Sheets in the Resident Engineer's File. 3.2 Highway Plan Sheets CONSULTANT shall prepare, coordinate and submit Design Plan Sheets in metric units for all highway design., and assure that interface information is provided to the other design consultants. CONSULTANT shall prepare Plan Sheets in metric units and in accordance with City requirements for the pathway and CALTRANS' Highway Design Manual requirements for highway improvements. CONSULTANT shall commence preparation of the Plan Sheets upon approval of the Bridge General Plan and Bridge Type selection by CALTRANS' Division of Structures. These Sheets will not be included in the combination PSR/PR. The Plans will include the following: A -19 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 1' Existing topography and the proposed layout. In flat terrain, contours may be eliminated; however, the general slope of the land shall be indicated. Land use shall also be shown. Layout lines for the highway, frontage roads, crossroads, ramps, and other major roadways must show either assumed or actual stationing. Curve radii of all layout lines must be shown. Horizontal clearances shall be noted. Directional arrows for all one -way streets must be included. Public roads, streets, creeks, and channels shall be labeled with their official names. Right -of -way lines with access control and opening locations must be shown. Except for scratch grading areas, the toe of fill and top of cut slope face must be indicated by appropriate symbols. Alignment or location controls shall be outlined and labeled. Profiles to suitable scale must be shown for overcrossing structure. The profile must show a ground line for each grade line shown. The proposed grade line must be labeled to show gradient, length of vertical curves, and stopping sight distance. The direction of travel and sight distances to off ramp noses shall be shown. All values required above may be graphically determined. It is not necessary to calculate any values until the geometrics are approved. It is anticipated that Plan and Profile sheets will be prepared in lieu of separate Plan sheets and Profile sheets. • superelevation diagram is not anticipated for work on the pathway. • geometric typical section of the overcrossing structure, pathway, and main highway shall be shown. All geometric elements, pavements, shoulders, curbs, medians, and right -of -way shall be shown and dimensioned. Details Not Required for these Improvement Plans: • Minor geometric details that are standard shall not be dimensioned. Embellishments shall not be shown. These include ramp nose radii, flares, truck turn and pavement widening, and details of standard public and private road connections. • Artistry such as slope hachures or tinting and artistic or futuristic north arrows shall not be used. CONSULTANT shall prepare the -Following Design Plan Sheets: 3.2.1 Base Mapping CONSULTANT shall provide new aerial photo and planimetric base mapping, based on 1983 NAD (Horizontal) and 1988 NAVD (Vertical). 3.2.2 Geometric Skeleton Base Sheets shall be prepared on 22" x 34" plan and profile sheets. Skeleton base sheets shall include basic layout information and identify all major construction features. A -20 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 IM 3.2.3 Typical Cross Sections for the highway and pathways shall be based on the approved standard sections, including pavement structural sections. 3.2.4 Utility Relocation/Occupat'.on Plans. CONSULTANT shall identify, propose final locations, and. prepare plans for utilities which are affected by the Project, such as water, sewer, gas, electric, cable TV, and telephone. These separate plans will be for relocations within the highway right -of -way only. See 3.2.6 for separate plans along with pathway. 3.2.5 Retaining Wall Layout Sheets shall be prepared. 3.2.6 Grading, Drainage, and Utility Layout Sheets for the pathway shall be prepared showing existing and proposed systems and for utilities which are affected by the Project, such as water, sewer, gas, electric, cable TV, and telephone. 3.2.7 Pavement Delineation plans shall be prepared (separate plans for the pathway and highway, if required). Signage for the pathway will be shown on the Pavement Delineation Sheets. 3.2.8 Signs. Field survey and develop inventory of existing signs and confirm with as- builts. For the highway, separate plans depicting all signs within the project limits will be prepared. 3.2.9 Other pertinent plans. CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for preparing and submitting an adequate number and type of plans in order to receive CALTRANS' and other agencies' comments early in the design phase to minimize change in subsequent tasks. Other plans, such as stage construction and traffic handling, landscaping, and electrical may be submitted for review by the appropriate CALTRANS departments. 3.3 Bridge Plan Sheets CONSULTANT shall prepare, coordinate and submit design plan sheets for the structure. CONSULTANT shall prepare the following Design Plan Sheets: 3.3.1 Bridge General Plan Upon completion of Preliminary Design, CONSULTANT shall submit a Type Selection Report and make a presentation for review and approval of the proposed bridge structure. This is the "Structure Type Selection" process and no further design work shall be performed until written approval of the structure type is received from the Division of Structures. A -21 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA The Type Selection Report will include the proposed General Plan, General Plan Estimate, and Type selection Memo and will be submitted for review two weeks prior- to the "Structure Type Selection" Review Meeting. Upon completion of review of Type Selection Report by CALTRANS DOS, CONSULTANT shall conduct a Type Selection Review Meeting that will be held in Sacramento. The CONSULTANT shall be prepared to discuss and provide information on foundation requirements, falsework requirements, seismic and aesthetic considerations, traffic handling, construction cost and other pertinent information that is needed to review and approve the proposed structure type. The results of the meeting will be summarized in writing to the CONSULTANT within two weeks following the meeting. Within two weeks after receiving written comments of the proposed General Plan and structure type, the CONSULTANT shall furnish DOS with 40 reduced (11" x 17 ") copies of the approved General Plans. 3.4 Design Reports: CONSULTANT shall prepare Design Reports as outlined in this section. CONSULTANT's submittal shall contain sufficient design calculations and other information based upon established CALTRANS' design criteria. CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit the following Design Reports: 3.4.1 Preliminary Drainage Report CONSULTANT shall conduct a study of local drainage and overland flood flow conditions, obtain historic drainage information, and prepare a Preliminary Drainage Report in the format approved by CALTRANS. The report shall include the following: • Existing conditions • Unusual and Special conditions • Drainage Mapping • Hydraulic Analysis • Proposed systems • Alteration of facilities of other agencies and agreements 3.4.2 Bridge Hydrology Report / Location Hydraulics Study (N /A) It is not anticipated that a bridge hydrology report will be required. A -22 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 PIM 3.4.3 Survey Report CONSULTANT shall submit Survey Report in accordance with CALTRANS Survey Procedural Manual, dated February 1994 or latest editions. Survey Report shall include control surveys, traverses, adjustments, and all field survey notes. 3.4.4 Foundation Reports and Log of Test Borings CONSULTANT shall submit a Foundation Report for the bridge and special retaining walls, which have been prepared and signed by an Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer, with deep foundation experience, registered in the State of California. Geotechnical investigations and foundation reports shall conform to the requirements in Section 4.3.5 of CALTRANS Bridge Design Specifications, latest edition. CONSULTANT shall perform soils investigation, including borings at the approximate locations of abutment and piers. Four soil borings and four Cone Penetration Testing borings (CPT) are proposed. At this moment, we estimate each soil boring would be 100 feet deep. CONSULTANT will arrange all permit applications and underground utility clearance prior to the investigation. We assume that the project site is non - hazardous for the cost estimate purpose; if the site is found to be hazardous, we will stop the drilling program and notify the City for further instruction. Drilling services for test borings shall be provided by CONSULTANT. Logs of test borings shall be provided with the Bridge General Plan to CALTRANS on plan sheets per CALTRANS requirements. The following laboratory tests will be performed on selected soil samples: • Unit weight and water content • Atterberg test • Grain size distribution • Consolidation test • Corrosity test • Direct shear test • Unconfined compression test CONSULTANT shall be familiar with current seismic design standards and CALTRANS response spectrum approach. Seismic Strategy Meetings with CALTRANS Office of Structure Design may be required in Sacramento. A -23 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 Logs -of -Test- Boring (LOTB) sheets will be prepared according the Caltrans guideline and findings from in -situ and laboratory testing will be documented in the Foundation Report. During type selection and -115% design, ARS design criteria for the project will be developed based on Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC). The 35% preliminary bridge design will be based on a response spectrum approach in order to get a fix on construction quantities and cost estimates. CONSULTANT shall prepare necessary foundation design parameters for the preliminary foundation design, including t -z curves, p -y curves and pile length estimates. Detailed seismic analyses will be conducted during final design phase. CONSULTANTS will develop at least one set of time history (three components) that is spectrum compatible to the ARS curve that is used during the 35% design. Because the Caltrans SDC is based on an attenuation relationship in soil, CONSULTANT will use an actual recorded motion from a soil site and then spectrum match to the Caltrans SDC curve. No site response analyses will be conducted. CONSULTANT will use this motion directly in dynamic time history analyses of a global bridge model. To implement foundation components in the global model, CONSULTANT will perform soil- structure interaction (SSI) analyses to establish foundation stiffness, mass, and damping matrices. These foundation parameters can be used to accurately represent the support foundations in the global bridge model, eliminating needs to implement individual piles and soil support curves. Once the foundation demands are available from the global bridge model, CONSULTANT will then perform pushover analyses to determine pile loads using non - linear soil support curves. It is important not to extract pile loads directly from the global model, especially using the response spectrum approach. Pile design will be performed following the pile loads determined from the pushover studies. A traditional pile design calls for providing three design tips based on (1) compression demand, (2) tension demand, and (3) lateral dernand. These tip elevations will be provided in standard Caltrans pile data table shown on the contract plan. Constructability of piles will be addressed including pile driveability study and providing a minimum pile wall thickness requirement. Potential for soil liquefaction, associated lateral spreading and the effects on the bridge foundations will be evaluated. A -24 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 I' The Foundation Reports and Log of Test Borings Sheets shall be prepared in accordance with pages 15 -2 through 15 -6 of the CALTRANS Bridge Design Aids manual, latest edition. Copies of the preliminary geotechnical recommendations shall be submitted to CALTRANS ]DOS with the Type Selection Report. The foundation report will be submitted with the 65 %, 95 %, and 100% DOS submittals. 3.4.5 Preliminary ridge Type Selection Report CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Bridge Type Selection Report for the bridge structure, and any special retaining walls or sound walls, and the pump station, and shall verify conformance with the design theme of the route at an architectural review meeting. The report shall include the following: • General description • Design and construction data • General Plan and Structure Type Selection Considerations • Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations • Recommendations 3.4.6 Materials Report/ Geotechnical Design Resort CONSULTANT shall prepare a Combined Materials and Geotechnical Design Report in accordance with Caltrans current requirements. The Combined Materials and Geotechnical Design Report shall include all necessary information and recommendations required to perform site grading, construct minor structures, and evaluate pavement sections. 3.4.7 Environmental Assessment Report The purpose is to determine soil and groundwater contamination and design any required remedi ation. The report shall be prepared in accordance with Caltrans current requirements. 3.4.7 Pavement CgdM It is not anticipated that corings of the existing pavement will be required. Information shown for existing pavement structural sections will be based on as -built or record drawings. A -25 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 3.4.8 Aerial Deposited Lead (A )L) Test Report Prepare an ADL Work Plan and a Health and Safety Plan for Caltrans' review and approval. Perform as many hand auger borings as needed, to collect soil samples for lead testing. At each site, collect samples for testing. Perform laboratory testing for lead using EPA Test Method 6010 and PH using EPA Test Method 9045. Prepare Aerial Lead Test Report (Draft and Final). Submit 1:o Caltrans for review and approval. 3.4.9 Lane Closure Report Collect seven (7) -day, 24 -hour traffic counts from Caltrans. If the counts are not available, perform 7 day 24 -hour traffic count at mainline and for all ramps where closures are required, including local streets. Perform lane closure calculations per Caltrans' standard methodology and submit draft lane closure report to Caltrans for review. Issue 20 copies of the final report. 3.5 Permits CONSULTANT shall prepare drafts of all permit applications for the Project, including highways and structures which will be reviewed and submitted by the City. City will be responsible for processing and paying permit application fees. 3.6 Right -of -Way (R/W) Engineering CONSULTANT shall be responsible for interfacing and coordinating selected right -of -way activities for the Proj : ct. It is anticipated that no additional right -of- way will be required for the project: however, utility relocations and possibly easements will be necessary. CONSULTANT shall verify that all right -of -way information shown on the plans is current and coordinated with the Caltrans and the City, and that the right of way is adequate for the project (right of way certification). Tasks included in the contract are: Determine all right -of -way needs for the project, including easements, utilities and acquisition information and other right -of -way information necessary to accomplish the project. Attend Trend Meetings to discuss utility. Identify utility issues (relocation, notices, etc.). 3.6.1 In the event right -of -way acquisition will be required, the CONSULTANT will perform the following Right -of -Way work activities: (N /A) • Prepare drawings and exhibits necessary for the City to perform right - of -way engineering including preparation of, Right -of -Way Record A -26 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA Maps, Record of Surveys, monumentation and other information necessary to acquire the rights -of -way for the project. • Attend Trend Meetings to discuss right -of -way related issues. • Communicate to the City in a timely manner any change in design which may have an impact on the right -of -way and acquisition process. • Prepare draft right -of -way certification from 35% plans. The certification shall include right of way takes, condemnations, clearances, easements (both permanent and temporary) and utility impacts. • Update certification when the plans are at the 65 %, 95% and 100% stage, or as required. • Include permit requirements in the right -of -way certification. • In accordance with City instructions, prepare the following documents for parcels, utilities, and construction and utility easements affected by the Project: - Right -of -Way Data Sheet - Utilities Review Checklist - Right -of -Way Status Sheet • Communicate with Caltrans and the City to insure inclusion of the proper dates into the certification for acquisitions, condemnations, clearances and other right -of -way related issues that may have an impact on the design schedule. • Review 100% plans to assure that necessary right -of -way caused by the proposed construction has been addressed. • Review draft right -of -way certification to ensure that the parcels which are required for the construction of the Project are included in the certification. • Prepare final certification when the plans are complete and outstanding utility issues (notices, clearances, etc.) are complete. • Prepare Draft Right of Way Appraisal Mapping 3.6.2 Work to be performed shall include the following work activities: • Legal Descriptions • Permit and Utility Coordination • Appraisals • Acquisition • Caltrans Right -of -Way Coordination • Caltrans Utilities Coordination A -27 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 3.7 Utility Design Process CONSULTANT will perform the following work activities: • Identify utility issues (relocation, notices, etc.). • Prepare input for utility notices. • Accomplish potholing and verifications, including providing horizontal and vertical survey referencing. • Assure that utility notices and potholing information comply with CALTRANS' utility requirements. • Communicate with right -of -way and project coordinator to ensure inclusion of the proper utility permit requirements and other utility data for R/W certification and design. • Assure that necessary utility impacts caused by the proposed construction have been addressed. • Prepare input for utility agreements. • Develop utility plans (including joint trench plans, if required) and utility envelope plans. • Promptly review and comment on utility notices and agreements. 3.8 Preliminary Construction Quantities and Estimates 3.8.1 CONSULTANT shall prepare Preliminary Construction Quantities and Estimate for the Project, including highway and structures. Estimates shall be prepared using a format acceptable to the City and Caltrans District 4 and shall be in accordance with Article 3, Project Estimate of Cost, of the PS &E Guide, latest revision based upon the CALTRANS' Standard Items of Work, and adding items as may be necessary. CONSULTANT shall prepare a list of the construction work and pay items required for the Project and a quantity estimate for each. Pay items shall be based upon CALTRANS' Standard Pay Items List and modified where feasible to match City Standard Pay Items. 3.8.2 CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate for the Project, including highway and structures. The cost estimate shall identify construction pay items, quantities, unit costs, and summarize the estimated total Project cost, including allowances for supplemental work, owner furnished materials, expenses, mobilization and contingencies 3.9 Preliminary Construction Schedule CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Construction Schedule for the Project based on the data developed by the CONSULTANT in Task 3.8. The schedule shall be prepared using Microsoft Project. CONSULTANT shall A -28 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 C promptly notify City of any differences between this construction schedule and the construction schedule in the most recent edition of the Base Case Plan. 3.10 Value Analysis (N /A) It is not anticipated that a Value Analysis (VA) or Value Engineering will be required. 3.11 Submittals The CONSULTANT shall submit the following documents during the preliminary engineering design phase: • Preliminary Design Plan Sheets • Design Reports • Design Checklist Updated • Draft Permit Applications • Utility Documents • Preliminary Quantities and Estimates • Preliminary Construction Schedule CONSULTANT shall perform a quality control review of the above Project documents two weeks prior to the 35% Preliminary Design Milestone submittal. 4.0 TASK 4. FINAL DESIGN - UNCHECKED Task 4 develops draft plans, specifications and quantities for Final PS &Q Unchecked (65% submittal) design completion, and includes responding to comments received from the agencies reviewing Task 3 submittals and identifying and resolving conflicts. CONSULTANT shall provide written response to the Preliminary Design (35 %) review comments received for the documents and provide justification for comment. CONSULTANT shall attend a meeting with CALTRANS and other agencies to resolve issues from Preliminary Design (35 %) review. CONSULTANT shall incorporate the agreed upon comments received from the City, VTA, CALTRANS, and other agencies, perform final design and prepare Final Design Unchecked (65 %) documents. CONSULTANT shall address comments and concerns from the Constructability Review. The submittal shall consist of the design documents which are required for the Project. CONSULTANT's submittal shall include, but is not limited to, the following: 4.1 Design Sheets CONSULTANT shall prepare bridge final Design Sheets. Plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements stated in CALTRANS' Publication Plans, A -29 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA Specifications and Estimates Guide and, where applicable, to the EFPB Information and Procedures Guide and the Drafting and Plans Manual all to be the latest editions in effect at Notice to Proceed. Title blocks shall be signed and sealed by an appropriate California Registered Engineer. 4.2 CONSULTANT shall incorporate all comments and prepare civil final design sheets. 4.3 Specifications and Special Provisions 4.3.1 CONSULTANT shall review CALTRANS' latest edition Standard Specifications and CALTRANS' Standard Special Provisions applicable thereto. 4.3.2 For all work items necessary for construction of the Project, CONSULTANT shall assemble data and prepare drafts of (1) necessary modifications to the Standard Special Provisions, and (2) additional specifications which may be necessary. Detailed information is provided in Article 4, entitled "Special Provisions," of the CALTRANS PS &E Guide. CONSULTANT shall follow instructions contained in the latest edition of that publication. CONSULTANT shall prepare the equivalent of Caltrans SSP for Sections 8 (Materials), Section 9 (Description of Work), and Section 10 (Construction Details). City will prepare the "boiler plate" special provisions. 4.3.3 Upon completion of the foregoing activities, CONSULTANT shall submit the SSP signature and seal sheet. 4.3.4 CONSULTANT shall coordinate specifications with other design consultants to assist design interface activities. 4.4 Right -of -Way Certification (N /A) CONSULTANT shall prepare Project right -of -way and utility requirements to in accordance with requirements stated in Task 3.6 and 3.7. CONSULTANT shall assure that sufficiency of right -of -way has been secured early enough in design to not impact the Project schedule during construction. 4.5 Construction Quantities and Cost Estimate CONSULTANT shall update the estimate of Construction Quantities and Cost Estimates to reflect design development from Preliminary design (35 %) to Final Design Unchecked (65 %). CONSULTANT shall follow instructions provided in Task 3. The estimate format shall be acceptable to the City. A -30 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 4.5.1 Prepare a Construction Quantity Estimate. 4.5.2 Prepare a Construction Cost Estimate. 4.6 Construction Schedule CONSULTANT shall update the Construction Schedule prepared as directed in Task 3 and shall promptly notify City of any differences between the update and the Construction Schedule for the :Project in the most recent City schedule. CONSULTANT shall coordinate mitigation, highway and structures construction schedule information to prepare the Project Construction Schedule. 4.8 Conceptual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) <HNTB> CONSULTANT shall perform the following to assure SWPPP compliance in accordance with Caltrans Standard. SWPPP Handbook, and Regional Board's Permit Requirements.: (1) Prepare Conceptual SWPPP report in draft and final format, (2) Prepare water pollution control plan, site layout and water pollution control details (water pollution control plan and site layout shall be color plots), and: (3) coordinate with Caltrans for review and approval. The drawings and reports shall be submitted in electronic format and will become the property of the City. 4.9 Submittals CONSULTANT shall perform in -house quality control review and submit the following Project documents in accordance with the approved schedule: • Design Plan Sheets • Approved Reports including Geotechnical and Foundation Reports • Specifications and Special Provisions • Permit Applications and Permits • Quantity Estimate • Cost Estimate • Completed Design Checklist • Construction Schedule • Sample Survey File • Conceptual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 5.0 TASK 5. FINAL PS &Q - CHECKED (95 %) <BCA/HNTB> CONSULTANT shall attend Joint resolution meetings with the City, VTA, CALTRANS and other agencies to resolve issues. CONSULTANT shall provide written response to Task 4, Final Design - Unchecked (65 %), review comments, with justification noted for A -31 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA each comment not incorporated. Prior to making submittals of the PS &Q- checked (95 %) documents, CONSULTANT shall assure that all comments are incorporated or resolved with CALTRANS and all its units, other r .-viewing agencies, and structures approval has been received from CALTRANS' DOS. Review at this stage of design will require several revisions and resubmittals of plans, specifications, quantities, and cost estimates. CONSULTANT shall allow adequate provisions in its design for these changes. The submittal shall be a complete, bid -ready set of documents, checked, stamped and signed. CONSULTANT shall perform the following activities: 5.1 Fact Sheets (N /A) CONSULTANT shall prepare any additional Mandatory and Advisory Design Fact Sheets prepared as directed in Task 3. 1, make final submittal to CALTRANS' Project Development and include these in the Resident Engineer's File. 5.2 Design Plan Sheets CONSULTANT shall incorporate the agreed upon comments received from CALTRANS, City and other agencies into the design plan sheets submitted as directed in Task 4.1 and prepare complete highway and structure construction plans. 5.3 Specifications and Special Provisions 5.3.1 CONSULTANT shall incorporate the agreed upon comments into the Special Provisions submitted as directed in Article 3.4.2 and prepare Special Provisions which are specific to the Project for use with CALTRANS' Standard Specifications latest edition. SSP shall be submitted in MS Word format. 5.3.2 CONSULTANT shall check that every construction work item for the Project has a method of payment stated in the Specifications and is accounted for in the Construction Cost Estimate. 5.4 Right -of -Way Certification (N /A) CONSULTANT shall update right-of-way and utility requirements as directed in Task 3.6 of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall prepare, sign and submit all Project Draft Right -of -Way Certification documents to the City for review. A -32 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 106-M, 5.5 Construction Quantities and Cost Estimate 5.5.1 CONSULTANT shall update the Construction Quantity Estimate submitted as directed in Task 4 CONSULTANT shall submit quantity calculations showing the sketches, diagrams and dimensions necessary for their use by field inspectors. The quantity calculations shall be independently checked. 5.5.2 CONSULTANT shall update the Construction Cost Estimate submitted as directed in Task 4. 5.6 Construction Schedule CONSULTANT shall update the Construction Schedule submitted as directed in Task 4.6 and shall promptly notify City of any difference between the update and the Construction Schedule included in the most recent City schedule. CONSULTANT shall coordinate highway and structure construction schedule information to prepare the Project Construction Schedule. 5.9 Submittals CONSULTANT shall perform in -house quality control review and submit the following Project documents in accordance with the approved schedule: • Design Plan Sheets • Specifications and Special Provisions • Permit Applications and Permits • Quantity Estimate • Cost Estimate • Construction Schedule • Sample Survey File (Updated with actual design data) • Provisions Appendix • Design Calculations • Quantity Calculations • Materials Report • Foundation Report • Independent Structural Check Calculations • Independent Quantity Check Calculations • Storm Water Data Report A -33 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 5. 10 Independent Check <HNTB> CONSULTANT shall perform an independent check of the drawings and calculations per Caltrans Standard procedure. The CONSULTANT shall prepare independent quantity calculations and review the special provisions independently. 6.0 TASK 6. FINAL PS &E (100 %) Task 6 incorporates comments from Task 5 and produces Final PS &E (100 %) documents ready for CALTRANS District 4 and Division of Structures (DOS) review and City advertisement. CONSULTANT shall review comments received from the reviewing agencies on the Task 5 submittals and attend comment resolution meetings with City, CALTRANS and other agencies to resolve issues. CONSULTANT shall incorporate agreed upon comments and assist City in preparing Bid Documents for advertisement. The following services and submittals are required from CONSULTANT: 6.1 Plans, Specifications and Estimates 6. 1.1 CONSULTANT shall update and incorporate into the Design Sheets, Special Provisions and Quantity Estimates submitted for Task 5 the comments received from the City, CALTRANS, and other agencies. 6.1.2 CONSULTANT shall submit to the City, and CALTRANS the revised Quantities and Cost Estimate. 6.1.3 CONSULTANT shall coordinate the plans, specifications and estimates with those of other design consultants and assure that highway design interfaces with structures design when all documents are combined to form a single Project PS &I: package. 6.1.4 CONSULTANT shall submit the Final PS &E (100 %) Specifications in the Caltrans format. 6.2 Wind Tunnel (Not -in- Contact - Amendment) CONSULTANT will retain a testing agency to perform a wind tunnel testing of the finalized bridge model to investigate the performance of the bridge due to extreme will loads and vibration due to pedestrian loading. Inclusion of Mass Tuned Dampers will be determined after the results of testing is reviewed, but are not anticipated to be required. A -34 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 6.3 Permits For the permits required from permitting agencies, CONSULTANT shall prepare draft documents and supply required Project design and construction information to the City, VTA and CALTRANS. to ensure conditions are resolved, and include these permits as part of the Bid Documents. 6.4 Right -of -Way Certification (N /A) If required, CONSULTANT shall provide updated Project right -of -way and utility requirements to City and update, sign and submit the draft right -of -way certification. 6.5 Resident Engineer's File <BCA> CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit a Resident Engineer's file and include all project relevant items identified in the Resident Engineer's file check -off list. CONSULTANT shall insure that the appropriate Resident Engineers' File items are in DOS format and assure consistency of all the design documents. The following items, as a minimum, shall be included for structures: Bridge deck contour 50 scale (formerly 4 scale) plans in accordance with Caltrans Memo to Designers 2 -2 or latest practice if necessary. Final Foundation Report Joint Movement Rating Calculations 6.6 Submittals CONSULTANT shall perform in -house quality control review and submit the following documents: • Bid Documents • Resident Engineer's File 6.7 Caltrans CAD Submittals Prepare submittals to Caltrans in DGN format for roadway and structure plans including existing and new Log of "Test Borings. As Built Log of Test Borings may be scanned into DGN files. The plans shall comply with Caltrans current A -35 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA Users Manual and Drafting and Plans Manual. Submittals shall be made on CD- ROM. 7.0 TASK 7. CONSTRUCTION BIDDING SERVICES Construction bidding procedures are the responsibility of the City. CONSULTANT shall provide engineering services, including Agreement Management (Task 1 during design), to support the construction bidding phase of the Project as described herein. 7.1 All services to be performed by thy,- CONSULTANT under Task 8 will be included in the agreement. 7.2 The following types of services are anticipated under this task. 7.1.1 Minor clarification of existing design. 7.1.2 Providing information to the City for responses to bidders' questions regarding the bid documents. 7.1.3 Attendance at the Pre -bid Meeting, and other meetings as requested. 7.1.4 Preparation of addenda to the bid documents. 7.1.5 Revision of bid documents as may be necessary to achieve an acceptable bid. 7.3 The types of services listed below are "in -scope services" which shall be performed by CONSULTANT, but will not be reimbursed. 7.3.1 Corrections of errors and omissions in the bid documents. 7.3.2 Providing data missing from the submittals required in the Scope of Services for the Final PS &E. 8.0 TASK 8. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES (Not in Contract- Amendment) CONSULTANT shall provide engineering; services, including Management (Task 1 during construction), to support the construction phase of the Project as described herein. Construction administration is the responsibility of the City or their assignee. Consultant can provide these services if required by the City. Services to be provided include: 8.1 Clarification of existing design. A -36 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 8.2 Providing responses to Requests For Information about the plans and specifications. 8.3 Review of shop drawings and other contractor technical submittals for conformance with the plans and specifications, and recommendation for acceptance, rejection or re- submittal. 8.4 Providing data additional to the submittals required in the Scope of Services for the Final PS &E. 8.5 Attend field meeting as needed at critical times during construction. 8.6 Make bi- monthly field visits during construction to observe progress and verify general conformance of construction to intent of plans and specifications. 8.7 Preparing record drawings based on Contractor red -lined plans. 9.0 TASK 9. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (Not in Contract - Amendment) CONSULTANT will provide construction management for the tasks outlined below for the duration of the construction schedule in accordance to the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Management activities shall consist of administration, coordination, attending meetings and quality control as stated in the following: 9.1 Prior to start of work, CONSULTANT's construction manager will review the R.E. file, contract plans and specifications, permits, agreements, easements, environmental documents, and pertinent reports and studies to develop a thorough understanding of the project construction schedule and required coordination between City of Cupertino, Contractor, Caltrans, utility companies, design team and other agencies involved in the project. A list of all the submittals that the Contractor must provide will be prepared to assist the City and the CONSULTANT in monitoring submittals. 9.2 CONSULTANT construction manager will meet with City representatives, Contractor, Caltrans, utility companies, design team and other agencies to discuss key project features, establish lines of communications, and review contract administration procedures. In addition, the CONSULTANT will meet with business, institutional, and residential representatives near the project that will be affected by construction activities. 9.3 The CONSULTANT will prepare project instructions and establish contract administration and record keeping procedures to be used during construction. A -37 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 lim These procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Project Manager prior to implementation. The proposed contract administration and record keeping procedures will follow the! guidelines established by the Caltrans Construction Manual and Caltrans Local Programs Manual. 9.4 The CONSULTANT will attend and participate in the preconstruction meeting with the Contractor who is awarded the construction contract. 9.5 The CONSULTANT will serve as focal point for coordination between the City, contractor, Caltrans, utility companies, design team, other agencies, inspectors, surveyors, and material testing agency, and other interested parties. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the following: • Maintain communication with the City's Project Manager and copy the City's Project Manager on all project correspondence. • Receive all Contractor correspondence and prepare and transmit responses to the Contractor after receiving concurrence from the City. Coordinate with applicable parties as required to develop responses. All correspondence received and responses transmitted will be tracked and logged in a correspondence log, complete with dates, transmittal parties, and general subject matter. • Attend weekly (or as necessary) construction contract coordination meetings with the Contractor. Meeting minutes will be taken and distributed to all parties designated in the project instructions. • Maintain contract files in a systematic and orderly manner consistent with the Caltrans Construction Manual. • Performing claims administration, including coordinating and monitoring claims response preparation, logging claims, and tracking claim status. 9.6 The CONSULTANT will review the Contractor's planned schedule for conformance with the specifications and for reasonableness of the sequence and duration of activities. The CONSULTANT will: • Review work progress, as compared to the planned schedule, and notify the Contractor of schedule slippage. • Analyze schedule to determine impact of weather and change orders. • Obtain from the Contractor progress updates of the schedule incorporating actual progress, weather delays, and change order impacts. • Negotiate time extensions due to change orders, weather, and other delays. 9.7 The CONSULTANT will prepare and submit monthly progress reports to City Project Manager describing key issues, cost status, and schedule status. 9.8 The CONSULTANT will review the Contractor's initial schedule of values for reasonableness and ease of monitoring. Key personnel will prepare monthly A -38 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA progress payment requests, negotiate differences over amount, and process payments through the City's Project Manager. 9.9 The CONSULTANT will manage the submittal process. 9.10 The CONSULTANT will manage the Requests for Information (RFI's) process as follows: • Receive, process, and monitor status of RFI's from the Contractor. • Prepare responses to RFI related construction issues. • Transmit design related RFI's to the design team and copy the City's Project Manager. • Conduct meetings with the Contractor and other parties as needed to discuss and resolve RFI's. 9.11 The CONSULTANT will prepare and issue change orders related to City requested design changes, construction issues and problems, and construction not in conformance with the construction documents. Change orders will be based on the current approved plans, specifications, and other design information from the design team and the City's Project Manager. Change order procedures items will include: • Submit background information and recommendations with change order documents for the City's Project Manager for review and approval. • Performing change order administration, including obtaining City approval of change order requests, issuing change orders to the Contractor, maintaining logs of proposed change orders, receiving change order quotations from the Contractor, negotiating change order costs and time extensions, processing final negotiated change orders, and incorporating approved change orders into the progress payment breakdown. • Performing quantity and cost analysis as required for negotiation of change orders. • Analyzing additional compensation claims that are submitted during the construction period and prepare responses. 9.12 The CONSULTANT will verify Contractor's compliance with specified contract compliance requirements including conducting worker interviews and verifying certified payrolls and subcontractor utilization. 9.13 The CONSULTANT will provide oversight and document hours expended, direct cost reimbursables, equipment utilized, and review all cost associated with Force Account work. 9.14 The CONSULTANT will perform the following Post Construction Services: A -39 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 314MI After issuance of the notice of completion for the construction Contractor, the CONSULTANT will consolidate punch lists of remaining work, compile record drawing information and prepare final City required forms. The CONSULTANT will provide one copy of revised record mylars of the project drawings to the City. The CONSULTANT will recommend final payment and all project files (organized in an orderly manner) will be transmitted to the City for archiving. 9.15 The CITY PROJECT MANAGER. shall review payment requests from Contractor with Consultant and shall comment on items to be clarified or resolved. Upon resolution of these outstanding issues, the City Project Manager will approve and process the Contractor payment request. 9.16 The CITY PROJECT MANAGER, shall review all Contractor change order requests, participate in meetings with Contractor to review or negotiate change order requests, and then approve and process contract change order. 10.0 TASK 10. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES (Not in Contract - Amendment) CONSULTANT will provide construction inspection for the entire duration of the construction schedule. Inspection activities shall consist of administration, coordination, attending meetings and quality control as stated in the following: 10.1 The CONSULTANT will provide inspectors for day -to -day, on-the-job observation and inspection of all works and improvements as shown on the plans and required by the specifications. The inspectors shall make reasonable efforts to: • Inspect plant fabrication and field construction practices and provide inspection reports in accordance with the project contract documents and the Caltrans Construction Records and Procedures Manual. • Perform required Quality Assurance Testing and prepare test reports. Quality Assurance Testing will be performed in accordance with California Test Methods, Caltrans Construction Manual, Chapter 8, and all applicable permits and City Standards distribute test reports to City, Contractor, Caltrans and design team. • Prepare daily inspection reports documenting observed construction activities. • Take progress photographs and bind and label them. • Mark up a field blue line set oi' drawings to incorporate Contractor record drawing markups. • Prepare punch lists of incomplete or unsatisfactory work. • Coordinate and conduct final inspection. A -40 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA • Assist with equipment testing and startup and other matters relating to construction of the project. • Monitor the Contractor's operations for quality assurance to the safety standards outlined in the Contractor's safety plan, and for public convenience. • Act as advocate, in the field, for local businesses impacted by the project, to ensure strict adherence to requirements for maintaining access. • The inspectors shall assist with monthly progress payment recommendations by making measurements of bid items on the project cost breakdown, checking the percent complete in the field, and assisting with Contractor meetings to resolve any differences in percent complete. LIST OF ANTICIPATED SHEET PLAN SHEETS General 1. General Notes 2. Abbreviations 3. Site Survey Sheets (Review only) 4. Site Survey Sheets (Review only) 5. Site Survey Sheets (Review only) 6. Site Survey Sheets (Review only) Civil 1. Demolition Plan 2. Demolition Plan 3. Demolition Plan 4. Demolition Plan 5. Layout and Profile 6. Layout and Profile 7. Layout and Profile 8. Layout and Profile 9. Site Architectural Layout 10. Site Architectural Layout 11. Site Architectural Layout 12. Site Architecture Details 13. Site Architecture Details 14. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities Plan 15. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities Plan 16. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities Plan 17. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities Plan 18. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities Details 19. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities Details 20. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan A -41 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 21. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 22. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 23. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 24. SWPPP Details 25. SWPPP Details 26. Traffic Handling Plan (I -280) 27. Traffic Handling Plan (I -280) Electrical 1. Site Lighting Plan 2. Site Lighting Plan 3. Site Lighting Plan 4. Site Lighting Plan 5. Lighting Details 6. Lighting Details Landscaping and Irrigation 1. Landscaping Plan 2. Landscaping Plan 3. Landscaping Plan 4. Landscaping Plan 5. Planting Details 6. Planting Details 7. Irrigation Plan 8. Irrigation Plan 9. Irrigation Plan 10. Irrigation Plan 11. Irrigation Details 12. Irrigation Details Structure Plans 1. General Plan 2. Index to Plans/ General Notes 3. Structure Plan 4. Deck Contours 5. Foundation Plan 6. Erection Staging No. 1 7. Erection Staging No. 2 8. Erection Staging No. 3 9. Abutment Layout 10. Abutment Details 11. Anchorage Layout 12. Anchorage Details No. 1 13. Anchorage Details No. 2 A -42 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA 14. Anchorage Details No. 3 15. Tower Layout & Details 16. Tower Details No. 1 17. Tower Details No. 2 18. Typical Section 19. Girder Layout 20. Girder Details 21. Precast Deck Panel Details 22. Camber Diagram & Concrete Type Limits 23. Cable connection 24. Cable Geometry and Forces 25. Main Cable Connection Details 26. Cable Band Details No. 1 27. Cable Band Details No. 2 28. Bearing Details 29. Abutment Joint Seal Details 30. Deck Drain Details 31. Railing Details 32. Electrical /Lighting Plan 33. LOTB END OF APPENDIX "A" A -43 Mary Ave. Bicycle Corridor Appendix A Scope of Services May 15, 2003 BCA APPENDIX B — PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT This is an appendix attached to, and made a part of, the Professional Services Agreement dated ( "Agreement ") between THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, ( "City "), and BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ( "Consultant "), for the provision of professional services ( "Services "). 1. Basic Services. City will pay Consultant for Basic Services, a maximum compensation of $1,300,000.00 ( "Contract Price "), which sum includes costs for reimbursable expenses as identified below. Such payment shall be full compensation for all Basic Services required, performed or accepted under this Agreement. If City and Consultant previously executed a purchase order for services within the scope of the Services of this Agreement, then the services performed and the compensation paid under that purchase order shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement and the previous payments deemed payments against the Contract Price established in this Appendix 2. Work Breakdown Structure. To assist City in determining progress payments, Consultant shall provide City with an itemization of its fee under this Agreement. Consultant shall define all project tasks, deliver a project schedule defining the time line for each task, deliver a project budget defining the planned man -hours and costs for each task, and a schedule of deliverables defining each deliverable to be provided to City. The Consultant shall further define which tasks are to be performed by each sub - consultant. [The project tasks are defined in Appendix A attached hereto. The planned man -hours for all tasks and schedules of direct costs appear in this Appendix. The project schedule that will provide a further breakdown of costs and schedule of deliverables will be delivered by Consultant according to Task 1.8 shown in Appendix A.] 3. Payment Schedule. Progress payments for Basic Services for each phase of the work shall be made as follows: by City ❑ upon completion of work X❑ monthly based upon Consultant's percentage completion of the Services as determined ❑ as set forth in the attached schedule 4. Additional Services. City will pay the Consultant for Additional Services beyond those noted in Section 1, "Basic Services," above, as agreed to in a written addendum or amendment ( "amendment ") to this Agreement executed by City and the Consultant. Payment for all such Additional Services shall be in an amount and upon the terms set out in such amendment. Each such amendment shall provide for a fixed price; or, where payment for such Additional Services is to be on an hourly basis, for a maximum amount plus Costs and Reimbursables. Each amendment shall also provide for a method of payment (i.e., partial payments or lump sum) and whether it will be based upon percentage of completion or for services billed. Amendments must be negotiated and signed by the Consultant and City prior to commencing work of Additional Services; otherwise, such costs are deemed within Basic Services. 5. Invoices. All payments shall require a written invoice from Consultant in a form acceptable to City. City shall make payment on approved amounts within each invoice within 30 days of receipt. Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California Biggs Cardosa Associates Total Fee Proposal, Task l Through Task? 1 5/21/03 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Hours 394 Rate/Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $88,650 Principal 1232 $154 $189,728 Engineering Manager 50 $118 $5,900 Senior Engineer 900 $111 $99,900 Project Engineer 100 $95 $9,500 Staff Engineer 180 $82 $14,760 Assistant Engineer 23 $75 $1,725 Sr. Comp. Drafter 255 $98 $24,990 Secreterial 131 $85 $11,135 Project Admin. 80 $105 1 $8,400 Total 3345 $454,688 2 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS HNT 3 $500,000 Kier & Wright $57,000 Fehr and Peers $15,200 Earth Mechanics $79,700 David Powers $18,300 Apex $10,000 Total $680,200 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS OTHER DIRECT COSTS ;?ercent X Base Fee ($) (Line 5) 10.00% $680,200 $68,020 Plotting $7,000 Reproduction $7,000 Communication $0 CADD $8,092 Other (vendors- subconsultants -etc.) $75,000 Total $97,092 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) KAMary Ave tasks and fee finalAs $1,300,000 Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 1 - Project Management 1 5/21/03 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Hours 200 Rate/Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $45,000 Principal 620 $154 $95,480 Engineering Manager 0 $118 $0 Senior Engineer 360 $111 $39,960 Project Engineer 0 $95 $0 Staff Engineer 0 $82 $0 Assistant Engineer 13 $75 $975 Sr. Comp. Drafter 0 $98 $0 Secreterial 120 $85 $10,200 Project Admin. 80 $105 $8,400 Total 1393 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) $200,015 $200,015 2 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS HNTB $0 Kier & Wright $0 Fehr and Peers $0 Earth Mechanics $0 David Powers $0 Apex $0 Total $0 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base (Line 5) 10.00% $0 Fee ($) $0 4 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel $0 Reproduction $0 Communication $0 CADD $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total $0 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) $200,015 K:\Mary Ave tasks and fee final.xls Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 2 - Planning and Preliminary Investigations, Conceptual designs, PSR/PR 1 5/21/03 DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Hours 40 Rate/Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $9,000 Principal 100 $154 $15,400 Engineering Manager 0 $118 $0 Senior Engineer 40 $111 $4,440 Project Engineer 0 $95 $0 Staff Engineer 20 $82 $1,640 Assistant Engineer 0 $75 $0 Sr. Comp. Drafter 60 $98 $5,880 Secreterial 10 $85 $850 Project Admin. 0 $105 $0 Total 270 $37,210 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS HNTB $171,000 Kier & Wright $54,500 Fehr and Peers $9,600 Farth MPnhanicc $0 David Powers 31 ts,jvu Apex $10,000 Total $263,400 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base Fee ($) (Line 5) 10.00% $263,400 $26,340 4 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel $0 Reproduction $0 Communication $0 CADD $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total $0 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) $326,950 K:\Mary Ave tasks and fee finalAs Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 3 - Preliminary Engineering (35 %) 1 5/21/03 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Hours 40 Rate /Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $9,000 Principal 100 $154 $15,400 Engineering Manager 0 $118 $0 Senior Engineer 80 $111 $8,880 Project Engineer 0 $95 $0 Staff Engineer 20 $82 $1,640 Assistant Engineer 0 $75 $0 Sr. Comp. Drafter 40 $98 $3,920 Secreterial 0 $85 $0 Project Admin. 0 $105 $0 Total 1 280 $38,840 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS HNTB $56,000 Kier & Wright $2,500 Fehr and Peers $5,600 Earth Mechanics $79,700 navirl Pnwera $0 Apex W Total $143,800 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base Fee ($) (Line 5) 10.00% $143,800 $14,380 4 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel $0 Reproduction $0 Communication $0 CADD $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total $0 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) $197,020 KAMary Ave tasks and fee finalAs Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 4 - Final design - Unchecked (65 %) 1 5/21/03 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Hours 50 Rate/Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $11,250 Principal 220 $154 $33,880 Engineering Manager 40 $118 $4,720 Senior Engineer 240 $111 $26,640 Project Engineer 40 $95 $3,800 Staff Engineer 100 $82 $8,200 Assistant Engineer 10 $75 $750 Sr. Comp. Drafter 80 $98 $7,840 Secreterial 0 $85 $0 Project Admin. 0 $105 $0 Total 780 $97,080 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS I iNTB $105,000 Kier & Wright $0 Fehr and Peers $0 Earth Mechanics $0 David Powers $0 Apex $0 Total $105,000 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base Fee ($) (Line 5) 10.00% $105,000 $10,500 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel $0 Reproduction $0 Communication $0 CAnn $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total $0 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) KAMary Ave tasks and fee finalAs $212,580 Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 5 - Final PS &Q- Checked (95 %) 1 5/21/03 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Flours 40 Rate/Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $9,000 Principal 100 $154 $15,400 Engineering Manager 10 $118 $1,180 Senior Engineer 80 $111 $8,880 Project Engineer 40 $95 $3,800 Staff Engineer 20 $82 $1,640 Assistant Engineer 0 $75 $0 Sr. Comp. Drafter 40 $98 $3,920 Secreterial 0 $85 $0 Project Admin. 0 $105 $0 Total 330 $43,820 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS HNTB $108,000 Kier & Wright $0 Fehr and Peers $0 David Powers Eu Apex $0 Total $108,000 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base Fee ($) (Line 5) 10.00% $108,000 $10,800 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel $0 Reproduction $0 Communication $0 CADD $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total $0 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) KAMary Ave tasks and fee final.xls $162,620 Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 6 - Final PS &E (100 %) with cost estimates 5/21/03 1 DIRECT LABOR Estimated Rate/Hour Total Estimated Hours Cost (Dollars) Principal In Charge 20 $225 $4,500 Principal 80 $154 $12,320 Engineering Manager 0 $118 $111 $0 $9,990 Senior Engineer 90 20 $95 $1,900 Project Engineer 20 $82 $1,640 Staff Engineer 0 $75 $0 Assistant Engineer 30 $98 $2,940 Sr. Comp. Drafter $0 Secreterial 0 $85 $0 Project Admin. 0 $105 $33,290 Total 260 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS $55,000 HNTB $0 Kier & Wright $0 Fehr and Peers $0 Earth Mechanics $0 David Powers $0 1 Mal 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base Fee ($) (Line 5) 4 OTHER DIRECT COSTS 10.00% $55,000 $5,500 $0 Reproduction Communication $0 $0 CADD $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) K :\Mary Ave tasks and fee final.As $93,790 Mary Avenue Bicycle Cooridor City Of Coopertino, California Biggs Cardosa Associates Task 7 - Construction Bidding Services 1 5/21/03 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS DIRECT LABOR Principal In Charge Estimated Hours 4 Rate /Hour $225 Total Estimated Cost (Dollars) $900 Principal 12 $154 $1,848 Engineering Manager 0 $118 $0 Senior Engineer Project Engineer Staff Engineer Assistant Engineer Sr. Comp. Drafter 10 0 0 0 5 $111 $95 $82 $75 $98 $1,110 $0 $0 $0 $490 Secreterial 1 $85 $85 Project Admin. 0 $105 $0 Total 32 $4,433 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS HNTB $5,000 Kier & Wright $0 Fohr p-re $0 T... -fl. Adonhonirc .DV Apex av Total $5,000 3 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR SUBS Percent X Base (Line 5) Fee ($) 10.00% $5,000 $500 4 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Travel $0 Reproduction $0 Communication $0 CADD $0 Other (vendors) $0 Total $0 5 TOTAL CONTRACT COST (sum of lines 1,2,3 &4) $9,933 KAMary Ave tasks and fee final.As MARY AVENUE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CITY OF CUPERTINO Consultant: Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. Date: May 12, 2003 Fringe Benefit % Overhead % General Administration % Combined % NORMAL 27.54% + Inc. in Gen. Admin. + 132.47% = 160.01% Name S.A. Biggs Function Principal Initial Wage (S/Hr) 75.00 % Wage Incr. - Scheduled Wage (S/Hr) 75.00 Comb. Overhead Generaa % Fringe, and Admin. Fee % 10.00% Hourly Rate From 5/1/03 1 To 10/1/03 Normal 214.51 O.T. 1.5 x N/A O.T. 2 x N/A Normal 1 160.01% O.T. 160.01% 225.23 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 78.75 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 82.69 236.50 5/1/03 10/1/03 148.50 D.B. Devlin Principal 51.92 - 51.92 5.00 54.52 155.92 10/1/03 10/1/04 10/1/04 1011105 163.72 5.00 57.24 5/1/03 10/1/03 T.M. Goolkasian Principal 48.17 - 48.17 137.77 10/1/03 10/1/04 144.66 5.00 50.58 10/1/04 10/1/05 151.89 5.00 53.11 M.M. Harms Principal 51.35 - 51.35 146.87 5/1/03 10/1/03 10/1/03 10/1/04 154.21 5.00 53.92 161.92 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 56.61 146.87 5/l/03 10/1/03 R.M. Schnabel Princi al 51.35 - 51.35 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 53.92 154.21 10/1/04 10/1/05 161.92 5.00 56.61 5/1/03 10/1/03 T.L. Swayze Principal 48.17 - 48.17 137.77 10/1/03 10/1/04 144.66 5.00 50.58 10/1/04 10/1/05 151.89 5.00 53.11 150.16 5/1/03 10/1/03 M.A. Thomas Princi al 52.50 - 52.50 10/1/03 10/1/04 157.66 5.00 55.13 10/1/04 10 /1 /05 165.55 5.00 57.88 101.48 5/1/03 10/1/03 S.A. Metzler Associate 35.48 - 35.48 10/1/03 10/1/04 106.55 5.00 37.25 111.88 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 39.12 132.82 5/1/03 10/1/03 D.L. Vallejos Construction Mgr. 46.44 - 46.44 139.46 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 48.76 146.44 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 51.20 I.S. Li Engineering Mgr. 38.37 - 38.37 109.74 5/1/03 10/1/03 10/1/03 10/1/04 115.23 5.00 5.00 40.29 42.30 120.99 10/1/04 1011105 113.03 5/1/03 10/1/03 D.H. Nguyen Engineering Mgr. 39.52 - 39.52 118.68 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 41.50 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 43.57 124.62 5/l/03 10/1/03 109.74 A.P. Notaro Engineering Mgr. 38.37 - 38.37 115.23 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 40.29 120.99 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 42.30 112.20 5/1/03 10/1/03 R.L.Oen Engineering Mgr. 39.23 - 39.23 117.81 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 41.19 123.70 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 43.25 109.74 5/1/03 10/1/03 S.F. Wade Engineering Mgr. 38.37 - 38.37 115.23 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 40.29 120.99 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 42.30 102.28 5/1/03 10/1/03 R.M.Firme Senior Engineer 35.76 - 35.76 107.39 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 37.55 112.76 10/1/04 10 /1 /05 5.00 39.43 MARY AVENUE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CITY OF CUPERTINO Consultant: Bites Cardosa Associates, Inc. Date: May 12, 2003 Fringe Benefit % Overhead % General Administration % Combined % NORMAL 27.54% + Inc. in Gen. Admin. + 132.47% = 160.01% Name Function Initial Wage ($/Hr) % Wage Incr. Scheduled Wage ($/Hr) Comb. Fringe, Overbead and General Admin. % Fee % Hourly Rate From To Normal 1 O.T. 1.5 x O.T. 2 x Normal O.T. M.T. Fretz Senior Engineer 36.06 - 1 36.06 160.01% 160.01% 10.00% 103.14 N/A N/A 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 37.86 108.29 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 39.76 113.71 10/1/04 1011105 J.P. Gutierrez Senior Engineer 32.60 - 32.60 93.24 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 34.23 97.90 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 35.94 1 102.80 10/1/04 10/1/05 G.P. Kenning Senior Engineer 36.92 - 36.92 105.60 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 38.77 110.88 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 40.70 116.42 10/1/04 1011105 A.L. Nye Senior Engineer 36.64 36.64 104.79 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 38.47 110.03 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 40.40 115.54 10/1/04 10/1/05 W.D. Hooper Project Engineer 28.56 - 28.56 81.68 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 29.99 85.77 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 31.49 90.06 10/1/04 10/1/05 Q. Liu Project Engineer 31.44 - 5.00 31.44 33.01 89.92 5/1/03 10/1/03 94.42 10/1/03 10/1/04 99.14 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 34.66 A.W. Richardson Project Engineer 31.44 - 31.44 89.92 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 33.01 94.42 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 34.66 99.14 10/1/04 10/1/05 M.W. Wong Project Engineer 30.00 - 30.00 85.80 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 31.50 90.09 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 33.08 94.60 10/1/04 10/1/05 W.M. Wooley Project Engineer 28.85 - 28.85 82.51 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 30.29 86.64 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 1 31.81 90.97 10/1/04 10/1/05 J.A. Alciati Staff Engineer 27.12 - 27.12 77.57 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 28.48 81.44 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 29.90 85.52 10/1/04 10/1/05 S.W. Au Staff Engineer 25.67 - 25.67 73.42 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 26.95 77.09 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 28.30 80.94 10/1/04 10/1/05 C.M. Bradbury Staff Engineer 26.25 - 26.25 75.08 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 27.56 78.83 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 1 28.94 82.77 10/1/04 10/1/05 D.Chan Staff Engineer 27.40 - 27.40 78.37 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 28.77 82.29 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 30.21 86.40 10/1/04 10/1/05 K.D. Cox Staff Engineer 26.54 - 26.54 75.91 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 27.87 79.70 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 29.26 83.69 10/1/04 10/1/05 G.O. Dizon Staff Engineer 27.12 - 27.12 77.57 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 28.48 81.44 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 29.90 85.52 1 10/1/04 10/1/05 MARY AVENUE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CITY OF CUPERTINO Consultant: Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. Fringe Benefit % Overhead % General Administration % NORMAL 27.54% + Inc. in Gen. Admin. + 132.47% _ Date: May 12, 2003 Combined % 160.01% Name Function Initial Wage ($/Hr) % Wage Incr. Scheduled Wage ($/Hr) Comb. Fringe, Overhead and General Admin. % Fee % Hourly Rate From To Normal O.T. 1.5 x O.T. 2 x Normal O.T. A.T.Goffe Staff Engineer 25.10 - 25.10 , 160.01% 160.01% 10.00% 71.79 N/A N/A 5/1/03 10/1/03 75.38 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 26.36 79.15 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 27.67 79.20 5/1/03 10/1/03 S.L. Larkins Staff Engineer 27.69 - 27.69 5.00 29.07 83.16 10/1/03 10/1/04 10/1/04 10/1/05 87.31 5.00 30.53 71.79 5/1/03 10/1/03 M.Z. Mneimneh Staff Engineer 25.10 - 25.10 5.00 26.36 75.38 10/1/03 10/1/04 10/1/04 10/1/05 79.15 5.00 27.67 77.57 5/1/03 10/1/03 S.E. Movies Staff Engineer 27.12 - 27.12 28.48 81.44 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 85.52 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 29.90 75.08 5 /1/03 10/1/03 K.A. Stokesberry Staff Engineer 26.25 - 26.25 78.83 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 27.56 5.00 28.94 82.77 10/1/04 10/1/05 5/1/03 10/1/03 79.20 J.D. Visaya Staff Engineer 27.69 - 27.69 83.16 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 29.07 87.31 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 30.53 67.64 5/1/03 10/1/03 F.R. Aron Assistant Engineer 23.65 - 23.65 71.02 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 24.83 5.00 26.07 74.57 10/1/04 10/1/05 5/1/03 10/1/03 64.35 V. DellaPas ua Assistant Engineer 22.50 - 22.50 10/1/03 10/1/04 67.57 5.00 23.63 70.95 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 24.81 5/1/03 10/1/03 54.46 K. Kamaideep Assistant Engineer 19.04 - 19.04 57.18 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 19.99 60.04 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 20.99 T. Kittiophakorn Assistant Engineer 21.92 - 21.92 62.69 5/1/03 10/1/03 10/1/03 10/1/04 65.83 5.00 23.02 69.12 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 24.17 65.18 5/1/03 10/1/03 E.C. Kneer Assistant Engineer 22.79 - 22.79 68.44 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 23.93 71.86 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 25.13 70.96 5/1/03 10/1/03 H.T. Nguyen Assistant Engineer 24.81 - 24.81 74.51 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 26.05 78.23 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 27.35 62.69 5/1/03 10/1/03 S. Pervais Assistant Engineer 21.92 - 21.92 65.83 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 23.02 69.12 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 24.17 66.01 5/1/03 10/1/03 B. Ruiz Assistant Engineer 23.08 - 23.08 69.31 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 24.23 72.78 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 25.45 71.79 5/1/03 10/1/03 R.B. Sanguinetti Assistant Engineer 25.10 - 5.00 25.10 26.36 75.38 10/1/03 10/1/04 79.15 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 27.67 MARY AVENUE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CITY OF CUPERTINO Consultant: Biggs Cardosa Associates. Inc. Date: May 12, 2003 Fringe Benefit % Overhead % General Administration % Combined % NORMAL 27.54% + Inc. in Gen. Admin. + 132.47% = 160.01% Name Function Initial Wage ($/Hr) % Wage Incr. Scheduled Wage ($/Hr) Comb Fringe, Overhead and General Admin. '/o Fee % Hourly Rate From To Normal O.T. 1.5 x O.T. 2 x Normal O.T. J.J. Delgado Sr. Comp. Draft. 32.60 - 32.60 160.01% 160.01% 10.00% 93.24 N/A N/A 5/1/03 1 10/1/03 5.00 34.23 97.90 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 35.94 102.80 10/1/04 10/1/05 S.M. Hickey Sr. Comp. Draft. 29.14 - 29.14 83.34 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 30.60 87.51 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 32.13 91.89 10/1/04 10/1/05 T.E. Hicks Sr. Comp. Draft. 27.98 - 27.98 80.03 5/1/03 .10/1/03 5.00 29.38 84.03 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 30.85 88.23 10/1/04 10/1/05 R.L. Quetulio Sr. Comp. Draft. 27.40 - 27.40 78.37 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 28.77 82.29 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 30.21 86.40 10/1/04 10/1/05 M.L. Tse Sr. Comp. Draft. 25.67 - 25.67 73.42 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 26.95 77.09 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 28.30 80.94 10/1/04 1011105 N.M. Benavides Computer Drafter 21.92 - 21.92 62.69 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 23.02 65.83 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 24.17 69.12 10/1/04 1011105 D.U. Mancini Computer Drafter 21.92 - 21.92 62.69 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 23.02 65.83 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 24.17 69.12 10/1/04 1011105 A. Rosales Computer Drafter 23.08 - 1 23.08 66.01 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 24.23 69.31 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 25.45 72.78 10/1/04 1011105 J.E. Brygider Secretarial Serv. 21.92 - 21.92 62.69 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 23.02 65.83 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 24.17 69.12 10/1/04 10/1/05 S.N. Luu Secretarial Serv. 16.44 - 16.44 47.02 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 17.26 49.37 10/1/03 1011104 5.00 18.13 51.84 10/1/04 10/1/05 Y.M. Mac Secretarial Serv. 17.31 - 17.31. 49.51 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 18.18 51.98 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 1 19.08 54.58 10/1/04 10/1/05 A.H. Martial Secretarial Serv. 15.29 - 15.29 43.73 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 16.05 45.92 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 16.86 48.21 1011104 1011105 C.A. Martinez Secretarial Serv. 13.00 - 13.00 37.18 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 13.65 39.04 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 14.33 40.99 10/1/04 10/1/05 T.A. McGuirk Secretarial Serv. 27.98 - 27.98 80.03 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 1 29.38 84.03 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 30.85 88.23 10/1/04 10/1/05 B.E. Paluso Secretarial Serv. 27.98 - 27.98 80.03 5/1/03 10/1/03 5.00 29.38 84.03 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 30.85 88.23 10/1/04 10/1/05 MARY AVENUE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CITY OF CUPERTINO N:2003/200312- MdeSchedule - S11212003 Date: May 12, 2003 Consultant: Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. Fringe Benefit Overhead % General Administration % Combined % NORMAL ° 27.54 /o + Inc. in Gen. Admin. + 132.47% = 160.01% Comb. Fringe, Overhead and Hourly Rate Initial % Scheduled General Admin. Name Function Wage Wage Wage `'' /o Fee % Normal O.T. 1.5 x O.T. 2 x From O.T. ($/Hr) Incr. ($/Hr) Normal S.M. Samford Secretarial Serv. 17.02 - 17.02 48.68 51.11 10 1/03 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 17.87 53.67 1 1 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 18.76 89.92 5/1/03 10/1/03 C.E. Sturla Secretarial Serv. 31.44 31.44 160.01% 160.01% 10.00% 94.42 N/A N/A 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.00 33.01 . 99.14 10/1/04 1011105 5.00 34.66 1 99.82 104.81 5/1/03 10/1/03 P.E. Thom son Project Admin. 34.90 34.90 10/1/03 10/1/04 5.. 00 36.65 110.05 10/1/04 10/1/05 5.00 38.48 N:2003/200312- MdeSchedule - S11212003 SCHEDULE OF DIRECT COST ITEMS DESCRIPTION UNIT COST Printing and Reproductions: A. Blueprints ($1.50 /sf max) SF ACTUAL B. Xerox Vellums ($10.00 /sf max) SF ACTUAL C. Photocopying ($0.10 /ea max) EA ACTUAL Computer: A. Computer Prints SF $1.00 B. Computer Plots SF $2.50 C. Computer Plots - Mylar SF $5.00 D. Microstation HR $20.00 Travel Expenses: A. Airfare B. Rental Car C. Personal Car D. Per Diem Delivery Services: A. Special Delivery/Shipping EA ACTUAL Miscellaneous: A. Film Developing ($20 /unit max) EA ACTUAL * ACTUAL COST IN CONFORMANCE TO CALTRANS TRAVEL GUIDE' DATED JANUARY, 1993, FOR NON - REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES. NOTE: ACTUAL COSTS ARE COPETITIVE PRICES FROM APPROPRIATE VENDORS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE INDUSTRIES COST PROPOSAL Hourly Rate Schedule HNTB Corporation NORMAL OVERTIME Fringe Benefit % Overhead % 48.26% + 104.54% + NA + NA + FEE % 10.0% Contract #: Cupertino - Mary Ave Attachment A Consultant HNTB Date: May 20, 2003 Page 1 of 1 FCCM %* Combined % 0.21% = 153.01% NA = NA f+nl PI11 ATInIJ INIMPMOTION lame and corresponding job classification. 1. For all key team members that are Ustea on me MUM M w- �� �a 11 - -'I-' • -• • - -- - For all other employees (i.e. support staff /non - professional) list only the job classification. 2. For named employees enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, list the average hourly rate for that classification. 3. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with sn asterisk ('). ' Per FAR, profit does not apply to the FCCM. HNTB Corporation SCHEDULE OF DIRECT COST ITEMS HNTB DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNI COST Printing and Reproductions A. Bluelines & Blacklines ($0.15 /sf Max) SF I Actual B. Sepia Vellum ($0.80 /sf Max) SF Actual C. Copying (Outsourced) 8 1/2 " x 11" size ($0.10 /sht Avg) EA Actual 11" x 17" size ($0.15 /sht Avg) EA Actual 81 /2" x 11" size color ($1.50 /sht Avg) EA 1 Actual D. Plotting ($20 per sheet or plot Avg) EA Actual Computer A. SpeciaI7 Programs Vehicle Expenses A. Airfare EA Actual"` B. Rental Car C. Personal Car D. Per Diem _ Delivery Services A. Overnight Mail Services ($25 /Unit Max) EA Actual B. Courier Service ($50 /Unit Max) EA Actual Communications A. Conference call EA Actual Miscellaneous A. Film, Film Developing, Binders Computer Tapes and Disks EA Actual B. Equipment Rental, Special Purchases (with State Authorization). EA Actual C. Word Processing (with State Authorization) EA Actual " ACTUAL COST PER LEASE/ACCESS /PURCHASE OR OTHER VENDOR ARRANGEMENT. (with State Authorization). •" ACTUAL COST, IN CONFORMANCE TO CALTRANS TRAVEL GUIDE FOR NON - REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES. NOTES: ACTUAL COSTS ARE COMPETITIVE PRICES FROM APPROPRIATE VENDORS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE INDUSTRIES, WITH STATE AUTHORIZATION. Date 05/20/03 If an item listed on the ODC sample form is captured in the Consultant's Overhead Percentages, the Consultant should note "not applicable" (N /A) in that section. APPENDIX C - INSURANCE This is an appendix attached to, and made a part of, the Professional Services Agreement dated ( "Agreement ") between THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, ( "City ") and BIGGS CARDOSA, INC. ( "Consultant "), for the provision of professional services ( "Services "). 1. Consultant's Duty to Show Proof of Insurance. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish to City satisfactory proof that Consultant has taken out for the entire period required by this Agreement, as further described below, the following insurance, in a form satisfactory to City and with an insurance carrier satisfactory to City, authorized to do business in California and rated by A. M. Best & Company [ B+ ] or better, financial category size [ FSC IX ] or better, which will protect those described below from claims described below which arise or are alleged to have arisen out of or result from the acts or omissions of Consultant for which Consultant may be legally liable, whether performed by Consultant, or by those employed directly or indirectly by it, or by anyone for whose acts Consultant may be liable: 1.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance Commercial general liability insurance, written on an "occurrence" basis, which shall provide coverage for bodily injury, death and property damage resulting from operations, products liability, blasting, explosion, collapse of buildings or structures, damage to underground structures and utilities. liability for slander, false arrest and invasion of privacy arising out of construction management operations, blanket contractual liability, broad form endorsement, a construction management endorsement, products and completed operations, personal and advertising liability, with per location limits of not less than $2,000,000 general aggregate and $1,000,000 each occurrence. 1.2 Business Automobile Liabilfty Insurance Business automobile liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence including coverage for owned, non -owned and hired vehicles. 1.3 Workers' Compensation Insurance Workers' Compensation Employers' Liability limits not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 per disease and $1,000,000 aggregate. Consultant's Workers' Compensation Insurance policy shall contain a Waiver of Subrogation. In the event Consultant is self - insured, it shall furnish Certificate of Permission to Self- Insure signed by Department of Industrial Relal:ions Administration of Self- Insurance, State of California. 1.4 Professional Liability Insurance Professional Liability Insurance, either (a) specific to this Project only, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each claim, or (b) limits of not less than $12,000,000] aggregate, all with respect to negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with services to be provided under this Agreement, wilh no exclusion for claims of one insured against another insured. Insurance policies shall contain an endorsement containing the following terms: 2.1 Additional Insureds. On Consultant's Commercial General Liability policy and Automobile Liability Policy, City of Cupertino and their affiliates, directors, officers, officials, partners, representatives, employees, consultants, subconsultants and agents, shall be named as additional insureds, but only with respect to liability arising out of the activities of the named insured, and there shall be a waiver of subrogation as to each named and additional insured. 2.2 The policies shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the company's liability. 2.3 Written notice of cancellation, non - renewal or of any material change in the policies shall be mailed to City thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date thereof. 2.4 Insurance shall be primary insurance and no other insurance or self insured retention carried or held by any named or additional insureds other than that amount Consultant shall be called upon to contribute to a loss covered by insurance for the named insured. 2.5 Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements shall have clearly typed thereon the title of the Agreement, shall clearly describe the coverage and shall contain a provision requiring the giving of written notice described above in subsection 2.3. 2.6 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant or any of its permitted Subconsultants may be held responsible for payment of damages resulting from their operations. 2.7 If Consultant fails to maintain any required insurance, City may take out such insurance, and deduct and retain amount of premium from any sums due Consultant under this Agreement. END OF APPENDIX C f+111. ML. 44 RlrrscnRD ACORDTa CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE 05 /08 /03D PRODUCER Dealey, Renton & Associates P. O. Box 12675 Oakland, CA 94604 -2675 510 465 -3090 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED - Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. 1871 The Alameda, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95126 INSURER A. American Motorists Ins. CO.* INSURER B: Security Ins. Co. of Hartford INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: ER AGES COV THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY-NUMBER PDATE MM/DD EFFECTIVE PDATE MM/DDTION' LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY 7RD804024 -01 03/01/03 03/01/04 EACH OCCURRENCE $1000000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $500,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Policy Excludes MED EXP (Any one person) $10,000 CLAIMS MADE Y OCCUR Claims Arising PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $1,000,000 X Blanket out of the Contractual GENERAL AGGREGATE s2,000,000 Performance of GENT AGGREGATE LIM IT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG s2,000,000 Professional POLICY X PR7 LOC JE Services A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO E7G08173202 04!15/03 04/15/04 COMBINED SINGLE LIMB (Ea accident) $1,000,000 X ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ X BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS X PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY: AGG $ ANY AUTO $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ OCCUR CLAIMS MADE $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 7CW23564211 09,101/02 09/01!03 X WC STA1 OTH- E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY E.L. DISEASE - EAEMPLOYEE $1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT 1 $1,000,000 B OTHER Professional AEE0700972 03,101/03 03/01/04 $1,000,000 per Claim Liability Ins. $2,000,000 Annl Aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONS /VEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT /SPECIAL PROVISIONS * The insurer's policy payment obligations are backed by a Cut - Through Agreement to National Indemnity Company, an A ++ rated Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary. A summary of the Cut- Through Agreement is attached. BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY, NON -OWNED and HIRED AUTOM0131LE LIABILITY (See Attached Descriptions) SHOULD ANYOFTH E ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TH E EXPIRATION City of Cupertino DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL %I WMAIL30_DAYSWRITTEN 10300 Torre Avenue NOTICE TOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TOTHE LEFT, B Cupertino, CA 95014 rae11:116aex18a»x AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 -S (7!97)1 Of 2 #M57278 esJql -------- ADDITIONAL INSURED: The Certificate Holder and any other person named in the written contract between the Named Insured and the Certificate Holder. The coverage afforded is pursuant to Section T., Additional Insureds - By Contract, Agreement or Permit, of Endorsement Form BP 7434. AMS 25.3 (07197) 2 of 2 #M57278 (EXCERPTS FROM) BP 74 34 (Ed. 07 99) — KEMPER PREMIER ENDORSEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING FIRMS THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED TO THE BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM, BP 7108: T. ADDITIONAL INSUREDS — BY CONTRACT, AGREEMENT OR PERMIT Item 5. of Section C. —WHO IS AN INSURED, is deleted and replaced by the following: 5. Additional Insureds — By Contract, Agreement or Permit Any person or organization to whom or to which you are obligated by virtue of a written contract, agreement or permit to provide such insurance as afforded by this policy is an insured, but only with respect to liability arising out of: a. "Your work" for that insured by you; b. Permits issued by state or political subdivisions for operations performed by you; or c. Premises you own, rent, occupy or use. This provision does not apply unless the written contract or agreement has been executed, or the permit has been issued, prior to the "bodily injury," "property, damage," "personal injury" or "advertising injury." This insurance is primary and is not additional to or contributing with any other Insurance carried by or for the benefit of Additional Insureds. U. AGGREGATE LIMIT OF INSURANCE (PER PROJECT) The following is added at the end of item b) of Section DA., Aggregate Limits: This General Aggregate Limit applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you. V. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION 2.a. If the insured has rights to recover all or part of any payment we have made under this policy, those i rights are transferred to us. This insurance shall not lie invalidated should the Named Insured waive in writing, prior to a loss, any or all rights of recovery against any party for a loss occurring. However, the insured must do nothing after a loss to impair these rights. At our request, the insured will bring "suit" or transfer those rights to us and help us enforce them. (EXCERPT FROM) BP 71108 (Ed. OT 99) BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM F.I. Hired Auto and Non -Owned Auto Liability b. 2) Section C. WHO IS AN INSURED in this Coverage Form, C., is replaced by the following: Each of the following is an insured under this Optional Coverage to the extent set forth below: d) Any other person or organization, but only for their liability because of acts or omissions of an insured... i E. 5. Separation Of Insureds Except with respect to the Limits of Insurance, and any rights or duties specifically assigned In this policy to the first Named Insured, this insurance applies: i a. As if each Named Insured were the only Named Insured; and b. Separately to each insured against whom claim is, made or "suit" is brought. ' Kemper. Insurance Companies Kemper/National Indemnity Cut- Throuszh Summary In the event Kemper receives an order to cease policy payments or is deemed insolvent by a court or regulatory order: • For policies where the notice is provided at the policy inception date, National Indemnity Company (NICO) will pay on behalf of Kemper 100% of policy payment obligations not previously paid by Kemper. • For policies where the notice is provided effective mid -term, NICO will pay on behalf of Kemper 100% of policy payment obligations not previously paid by Kemper for any claim where damages, loss or offense commences on or after the date on which the notice was provided. • Claim payments to insureds and claimants, including payments to mortgagees and assignees are covered, as are legally declared payable dividends, retro premium adjustments and return premiums • Third party liability payments will be made upon either legal judgement, approval by Kemper prior to any order, or NICO approval after such order • An insured does not have to notify NICO of any claims or suits unless they have received actual notice of an order issued by a court or regulator • All policy payment obligations of the original policy continue to apply • NICO will bear 100% of all reasonable defense costs • There is no sunset provision on the payment obligation by NICO NICO is the lead member of the Berkshire Hathaway Group of insurance companies and is `A++' rated by A.M. Best and AAA by Standard & Poor's Disclaimer - This is not intended to be a legal interpretation. The actual wording of the notice will always govern the application of this cut - through notice. BIGGS CAROOSA ASSOCIATES INC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS HNTB PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE I. STROMSTEAD, C.E. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART City of Cupertino Design of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge BRIDGE CONCEPTUAL 8 CIVIL ENGINES ANDSCAP I BRIDGE NNTBTE�RE I LANDSCAPE I URBAN DESIGN I ELECTRICAL I 'SURVEYING / _ I TR FEHR d WE RING I G EARTH T ECNY AL ENGINEER CS I ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES INDEPENDENT CHECK ARCHITECTUREIELECTR /CAL ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING RIGHT OF -WAY DAVID J.POWERS NNTB : iin7e "nip niiTv NCRd�rR /Gffl 6/iJJV4 " " /AICJ SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ;PROJ;ECT ANAGER P ROJECT MANAGER BRIDGE ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PROJECT MANAGER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER PRINGPAL IN CHARGE ENGINEER GEOTECHNICAL MANAGER PRINGPAL IN CHARGE ER, S.E. J. LITZINGER, C.E. G. DeMOND, A.I.A. S. SIMPSON, A.S.L.A. B. ELROD, A.S.LJ M. MAUNG, E.E. G. GOLOBIC, C.E. K CHOY I. LAM J. HESLER PROJECT MANAGER BRIDGEARCHI7ECT SURVEY MAMA GER TRANSPORTATION SENIOR ENGINEER PROJECT MANAGER J. PACK S. KIM, C.E. E. SUPCOFF, A.I.A J. VIGIL, L.S. ENGINEER H. LAW J. SCHWARZ , I J. GLTIE BRIDGE DESIGNER T. ZOLI, P.E. BRIDGE DESIGNER C. MALLARE, C.E. STAFF HNTB PREUMINARY CIVIL DESIGN LIGHTING A ELECTRICAL FINAL CIVIL DESIGN BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE GAD, PSR, PR DESIGN RENDERING PROJECT REPORTS VISUAL DESIGN UTILITY SEARCH HYDROLOGY GRADING HYDRAULIC STUDIES UTILITY PUNS PERMITS DRAINAGE TRAFFIC HANDLING BRIDGE CONCEPTUAL d STAGE CONSTRUCTION INDEPENDENT CHECK SIGNAGE PLANS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYPARTY CHIEF T. RUBIO, L.S. PUBLIC RELATIONS APEX STRATEGIES PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE E. GOODWIN r . STAFF A I STAFF STAFF STAFF k r STAFF BIGGS CAROOSA ASSOCIATES KIER i WRIGHT FEHR i PEERS PROJECT MANAGEMENT SURVEYING TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BRIDGE ALERNATIVE STUDIES R/W ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT MAPPING PRELIMINARY STRUCTURAL DESIGN FINAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN PS d E PREPARATION PROJECT COST ESTIMATING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PERMITS VALUE ENGINEERING STAGE CONSTRUCTION EARTH MECHANINCS DAVID J. POWERS & ASSOC. APEX STRATEGIES GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN ENGINEERING FOUNDATION REPORT MATERIAL TESTING GEOTECHNICAL CONST. ENGINEERING TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS CEQA,WEPA COMPLIANCE PUBLIC OUTREACH SECTION 404 /ARMY CORPS PERMITS FISH d GAME PERMITS WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION INTERAGENCY COORDINATION PERMIT APPUCATION F NTB PROJECT STAFFING Biggs Cardosa Associates in association with HNTB, has selected Kier & Wright, Earth Mechanics, David Powers & Associates and Apex Strategies to assist us on this project. We have worked with the majority of these firms on numerous transportation projects and feel that we bring the City of Cupertino a well- coordinated and technically strong team. The following is a summary of the services each firm will be providing, their specific responsibilities and estimated level of participation. BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. 1871 The Alameda, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95126 Phone: (408) 296 -5515 Fax: (408) 296 -8114 Principal -in- Charge: Project Manager: Senior Design Engineer: Senior Design Engineer: Project Design Engineer: Quality Control Manager: Quality Control Engineer: Stephen A. Biggs, S.E. Mahvash M. Harms, S.E. Greg P. Kenning, C.E. .Joseph P. Gutierrez, C.E. Sonny W. Au, C.E. :Michael A. Thomas, S.E. Dzung H. Nguyen, C.E. Services Provided: Project Management, Structural Engineering, and Quality Control The following experienced staff will be assigned to lead this project for Biggs Cardosa Associates. Stephen A. Biggs, S.E., will act as Principal in Charge on this project and his involvement will be to establish the design criteria and strategy for the project as well as reviewing the contract documents prior to the final submittal. Stephen Biggs has acted as President of Biggs Cardosa Associates since its inception in 1986. He has over 25 years of experience in the Bay Area as a structural engineer specializing in the design of transportation projects. Mr. Biggs has been involved as Principal in Charge or Project Manager for the design of over 300 bridges. Mahvash M. Harms, S.E. will act as Project Manager and will be responsible for all client contact, project scheduling, implementation of an overall design strategy, including technical supervision and day -to -day management of the project design team wid all subconsultants. Ms. Harms has over twenty years of experience in Project Management and Structural Engineering of projects that included coordination and obtaining permits from different agencies like Caltrans, including: • State Route 152/156 Interchange • Tasman Corridor LRT P.O.C. • San Jose International Airport POC • 87/101 Separation • Southbound Route 87 Northbound 85 Connector • Route 237/North First Street Interchange • Guadalupe River Viaduct & Widening at 237 • Oakland Road & E. Hedding Street Overcrossings at 101 �� ,� Greg P. Kenning, C.E. and Joe P. Gutierrez, C.E. will act as Senior Design Engineers responsible for preparation of the structural calculations, computer analysis, preliminary drawings, final contract documents, quantities, estimates and special provisions. Both Greg Kenning and Joe Gutierrez have acted as Senior Engineer on numerous bridge and highway projects in California. Sonny W. Au, C.E. will act as Project Design Engineer and be responsible for preparation of structural calculations, computer analysis, preliminary drawings, final contract documents, quantities and estimates. Michael A. Thomas, S.E. will act as our Quality Control Manager for this project. He will provide complete quality control of all plans and details at the preliminary design phase and prior to submittal of final plans, specifications and estimate. Michael lbomas has acted as Project Manager on the following pedestrian bridges: • Andrew Molera Ped Bridge, Monterey • Alhambra Creek Pedestrian Bridges, Martinez • San Felipe Road Bridge, San Jose • Campbell Park Bridges • Brentwood Park Ped Bridge, Brentwood • Sand Creek Road PUC, Brentwood • Broadway Brommer Extension, Santa Cruz • Oakland Coliseum POC over I -880, Oakland Dzung H. Nguyen, C.E. will act as Quality Control Engineer for this project. He will provide complete quality control of all plans and details at the preliminary design phase and prior to submittal of final plans, specifications, and estimate. HNTB 2025 Gateway Place San Jose, CA 95110 Phone: (408) 451 -7300 Fax: (408) 451 -6942 Design Services: Principal in Charge: Robert Stromstead, C.E. Landscape Architect: Barbara Simpson, A.S.L.A. Civil Engineering Manager: John Litzinger, C.E. Electrical Engineer: Min Maung, E.E. Bridge Architect: Gregory DeMond, A.I.A. Urban Designer: Brian Elrod, A.S.L.A. Bridge Architect: Evan Supcoff, A.I.A. Bridge Conceptual and Independent Check: Project Manager: Semyon Treyger, S.E. Project Manager II: Simon Kim, C.E. Bridge Designer: Theodore P. Zoli, P.E. Bridge Designer: Chip Mallare, C.E. Services Provided: Civil Engineering, Bridge Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Urban Design, Electrical Engineering, Bridge Conceptual Design and Bridge Independent Check Please refer the resumes of the Biggs Cardosa Associates and HNTB Key Personnel following this section of the Proposal. -ate SUBCONSULTANTS FEHR & PEERS 255 n. Market Street, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95112 Phone: (408) 278 -1700 Fax: (408) 278 -1717 Senior Transportation Engineer: Transportation Engineer: Services Provided: KIER & WRIGHT 3350 Scott Blvd. Building 22 Kristiann Choy Jason Pack Traffic Engineering Santa Clara, CA 95054 Phone: (408) 727 -6665, Fax: (408) 727 -5641 Principal in Charge: Gene Golobic, C.E. Survey Manager: Jimmy Vigil, L.S. Party Chief: Tony Rubio Services Provided: Surveying, Right -of -Way EARTH MECHANICS 17660 Newhope Street, Suite E Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Phone: (714) 751 -3826 Fax: (714) 751 -3928 Geotechnical Manager: Ignatius Lam, C.E. Senior Project Engineer: Hubert Law, P.E. Services Provided: Review Available Foundation Data, Site Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Investigation, Foundation Report, Material Testing, Hazardous Waste Investigation DAVID POWERS & ASSOCIATES 1885 The Alameda, Suite 204 San Jose, CA 95126 Phone: (408) 248 -3500 Fax: (408) 248 -9641 Principal in Charge: John Hesler Project Manager: John Schwarz Services Provided: Environmental Engineering, Permit Applications APEX STRATEGIES 111 Nanna Court Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Phone: (831) 460 -1530 Principal in Charge: Services Provided: Fax: (831) 460 -1420 Eileen Goodwin Public Outreach Please refer to detailed resumes of our Subconsultanrs' Qualifications and resumes of their Key Personnel in the Subconsultant Section of this Proposal. -BCC STEPHENA. BIGGS Principal Registration Structural Engineer, State of California, 52272 Civil Engineer, State of California, C26113 Education B.S. Civil Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California Responsibilities Responsibilities as Principal include project development, staffmg and control of personnel, project management and engineering for public works projects, and engineering quality control. Project Current and completed projects which required the direct involvement of Stephen A. Biggs as Experience Principal in Charge or Project Manager include: • Highway, pedestrian, railroad and light rail bridges, transit structures, and tunnel projects for Caltrans, City of San Jose, VTA, Santa Clara County, Santa Clara Valley Water District, City of San Carlos, City of Palo Alto, Santa Clara County Traffic Authority, City of Fairfield, City of Santa Cruz, City and County of San Francisco, County of Alameda, Contra Costa County, San Mateo County, Monterey County, City of Burlingame, Napa County, Yuba County, City of Fremont, Alameda County Flood Control, State of Nevada, State of Oregon and numerous construction and development companies. • The seismic retrofit of over 150 bridge structures during Phase I, Phase 11, and various local agency contracts with Caltrans, County of Santa Clara, City of San Jose, City of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco, including assistance on the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge Retrofit and the San Mateo Bridge Retrofit. • Value engineering of numerous Phases of the San Francisco International Airport expansion project including the Automated Rail Transit System (people mover), the elevated circulation roadways, the inbound and outbound. freeway ramp structures, Concourse H; the BART and ART Intermmodal Station, and the ART System Maintenance Facility. • Industrial buildings and facilities for Exodus, Lightwave, HMT, Hewlett Packard, Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., NASA, IBM, General Electric, Intel, Spectra Diode and Sperry Univac. • Structural rehabilitation and seismi(; retrofit of St. Joseph's Cathedral, Executive Building, St. James Hotel, and New Century Building. Structural modification of numerous old buildings on the San Jose Transit Mall for the City of San Jose. • Commercial buildings for Synopsis, Cisco, Safeway, Payless, Walgreens, Gavilan Bank and Almaden Valley Shopping Center. • Parking structures for the City of San Mateo, Town of Los Gatos, City of Santa Cruz, the City of Campbell and Steinbeck Plaza. • Sewage treatment plants and pump Stations for the City of San Jose, City of Eugene, Santa Clara County, City of Fairfield, City of Carmel, City of Minden Garnerville, County of San Benito, and the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority. Professional Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Affiliations American Concrete Institute Prestressed Concrete Institute American Welding Society American Institute of Steel Construction MAHVASH M. HARMS Principal Registration Civil Engineer, State of California, C31736 Structural Engineer, State of California, S2639 Education B.S. Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, California M.S. Civil Engineering, San Jose State: University, San Jose, California Responsibilities Responsibilities as Principal include 1?roject management, staffing, scheduling and budgeting, obtaining permits, oversight of structural analysis and design of project, development of construction details and specifications, production of contract documents, coordination with client, contractor, and subconsultants, and field review of construction. As Project Manager for multi - disciplinary projects, Ms. Harms' responsibilities also include: coordinating all roadway geometrics, channel work, traffic control, construction staging, utility coorrdination and relocation and environmental issues associated with the projects including close coordination with VTA, Caltrans, cities, counties, water districts, Army Corp of Engineers, Department of Fish and Game, utility agencies and various other government agencies. Project Current and completed projects which required the direct involvement of Mahvash M. Harms as Experience Principal, Project Manager, or Quality Control Manager include: Highway Overcrossings, undercrossings, structure widenings, elevated roadways, grade separations, and viaducts for Caltrans, various Counties, cities and other local agencies, including work on major interchanges such as SR 85/87, SR 87/101, SR 85/Hwy 101 South, numerous bridges along Hwy 101 and 237 as part of MSA project and Rte. 237/N. First Street. Seismic Retrofit The seismic repair of earthquake damaged structures and seismic retrofit of numerous structures for and Repair Caltrans' Phase I, and Phase Il Retrofit Programs and numerous local agency contracts with Caltrans, Santa Clara County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, Monterey County, Santa Cruz County, City of San Mateo, City of Salinas, City of Watsonville, City of San Jose and other local agencies. HBRR, Numerous Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation projects from staged bridge replacement Rehabilitation projects, deck repairs to total barrier replacement including Watsonville Slough Bridge @ Harkins and Barrier Slough Road in Watsonville and Guadalupe River Viaduct at Route 237 in San Jose. Replacement Rail Structures Heavy, light rail, and BART projects including overheads, underpasses, guideways, station platforms and transit access structures, including a 2000 -foot long LRT aerial guideway in Campbell, CA., San Carlos Overhead modification in San Jose for the LRT on the Vasona Corridor and Sanborn Overhead seismic retrofit in the City ot, Salinas. Pedestrian and Numerous pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle bridges over highways and waterways for local agencies Bicycle Bridges such as Loma Prieta School pedestrian bridge in Los Gatos, Los Gatos Creek pedestrian bridge in Campbell, Tasman Corridor LRT pedestrian Overcrossing in San Jose and Milpitas and San Jose International pedestrian bridge in San Nose. Highway Signal and sign structures, special metal railing and light poles including a 55.5 -meter (182 -foot) Mounted double truss overhead steel signal structure for the Taylor Street Urban Interchange on Route 87 in Structures San Jose. Walls Walls for sound and visual mitigation, and retaining walls of varying types and systems, including cantilevered walls, soil -nail walls, tie-back walls, mechanically stabilized embankment walls, specialty block gravity walls consisting of various materials and heights ranging from 5 to 40 -feet. Miscellaneous Various infrastructure projects, which include water reservoirs, pump stations, utility vaults, junction Infrastructure boxes, outfall structures, culverts, concrete lined channels, U -framed channels, trapezoidal channels, and floodwalls, including the 2000 -foot long Guadalupe River diversion/bypass box culvert in downtown San Jose. Construction Project Management for construction inspection, support to Contractors for such things as design/build, temporary shoring, failure studies, value engineering including the project management for the inspection of the Sanborn Overhead seismic retrofit and barrier replacement in the City of Salinas and Cushing Parkway Viaduct in Fremont. Relevant • Cushing Parkway Viaduct, Fremont, CA: Project Manager for a 1,800 L.F. long new elevated Projects roadway bridge over wetlands. • Route 85/87 Interchange, San Jose, CA Project Manager for the design of the Southbound 87/Northbound 85 Connector and seismic retrofit of the SB Route 87 Connector and Quality Control for all other structures on SR85 /SR 87 Interchange. • Watsonville Slough and Struve Slough Bridges (PSR & PS &E), Watsonville, CA: Project Manager for an Advanced Planning Study and preparation of the construction document (PS &E) for a 670 -foot long structure and a 790 foot long structure at Harkins Slough Road. • State Route 152/156 Interchange (PSR/PR and PS &E), Santa Clara County, CA: Project Manager for the Advanced Planning; Study, PSR/PR and Project Reports and preparation of the construction documents (PS &E) for VTA and Caltrans. She was also Project Manager for design and construction management for: • San Jose International Airport Pedestrian Overcrossing, San Jose, CA • Loma Prieta School Pedestrian Bridge, Los Gatos, CA • Tasman Corridor LRT Pedestrian Overcrossing and Elevated Structures, San Jose/Milpitas • Los Gatos Creek Pedestrian Bridges, Campbell, CA Professional Structural Engineering Association of Northem California Affiliations CELSOC — Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California APWA — American Public Works Association Member of Code Enforcement Board of Appeals, County of Santa Clara MICHAEL A. THOMAS Principal Registration Civil Engineer, State of California, C49793 Education B.S. Civil Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California B.S. Computer Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California Responsibilities Responsibilities as Principal include client development, contract negotiations, project staffing, project scheduling, supervision of project engineers and draftsmen, and engineering quality control and job cost control for projects under his supervision. Project Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Experience Experience • Andrew Molera Ped Bridge, Monterey Co., CA: PM for prefabricated ped/bicycle bridge • Brentwood Park Ped Bridge, Brentwood, CA: PM for prefabricated ped/bicycle bridge • Alhambra Creek Ped Bridges, Martinez, CA: PM for 2 precast concrete ped/bicycle boardwalks • Sand Creek Rd PUC, Brentwood, CA: Project Manager for ped/bicycle bridge undercrossing • Sand Creek Rd Ped Box UC, Brentwood, CA: PM for box culvert ped/bicycle subway • San Felipe Road Bridge, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for prefabricated ped/bicycle bridge • Broadway- Brommer Extension, Santa Cruz, CA: Project Manager for APS of 2 bicycle bridges • Campbell Park Bridges, Campbell, CA: QC Engineer for 3 prefabricated ped/bicycle bridges • Feather River Bridge, Yuba City, CA: Designer for bicycle lane widening of 1500 -ft. bridge • Oakland Coliseum POC over I -880, Oakland, CA: Designer for Advanced Planning Study Highway Bridge Experience • South 85/101 Interchange, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for 11 bridge structures • Coyote Creek Bridge/101 VECP, San Jose, CA: Assistant PM for redesign of 5 -span bridge • Santa Teresa Bridges, San Jose, CA.: Project Manager for 5 bridges over Fisher Creek • River Islands, Lathrop, CA: PM for multi-bridge study including signature structure • Route 87 Widening, San Jose, CA: assistant PM for 4 widenings and seismic retrofits • Cypress Rd Bridge, Brentwood, CA.: Project Manager for bridge widening • Bridgeway Lakes, West Sacramento, CA: PM for structures in large residential development • Goldridge, Fairfield, CA: Project Manager for 3 bridges in a residential development • Sunset Road Bridge, Brentwood, CA: Project Manager for bridge over Marsh Creek • Stevens Creek / I -880, San Jose, CA.: Project Manager for APS of ramp separation structure • Bailey Ave West, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for 2 bridges over Fisher Creek • Calle De Cisco OC, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for roadway grade separation structure • Blossom Hill Ave OC, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for APS of bridge widening over Hwy 101 • Hellyer Ave OC, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for APS of bridge replacement over Hwy 101 • King Rd Driveway Bridge, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for new bridge over Silver Creek • Bailey Ave OC, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for new bridge over Highway 101 • Coyote Creek Bridge, San Jose, CA.: Project Manager for 4 -span bridge at Bailey Ave • Walnut Ave Bridge, Brentwood, CA: Project Manager for widening existing slab bridge • Tully Road OC, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for PSR for widening of existing 4 -span bridge • Jack Tone Road/Hwy 99 Interchange, Ripon, CA: Project Manager for PS &E of 4 bridges • Slag Haul Road/I -10 Interchange, Ontario, CA Project Manager for APS of a ramp separation • Foxworthy Avenue Bridge, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for 2 -span HBRR bridge replacement • Saratoga - Sunnyvale OC, Cupertino, CA: Project Engineer for bridge widening • Great America Parkway UC, Santa Clara, CA: Designer for two 2 -span bridges • San Tomas Aquino Creek, Santa Clara, CA: Designer for four 5 -span bridges • Oka Road UC, 17/85 Interchange, Los Gatos, CA: Designer for 6 bridges • Bascom Avenue Ramps, 17/85 Interchange, San Jose, CA: Designer for two 3 -span bridges • Lark Avenue OC, Los Gatos, CA: Quality Control Engineer. Project included stage construction Local Agency Seismic Retrofit Exueriience • Big Sandy Creek Bridge, Monterey County, CA: Project Engineer for 5 -span steel bridge • Nacimiento Creek Bridge, Monterey County, CA: Project Engineer for 2 -span steel bridge • Fair Oaks Avenue Overhead, Pasadena, CA: Project Engineer for 3 -span bridge • Tasman LRT Overhead, Santa Clara, CA: Project Engineer for LRT bridge over SPTCo. Tracks • Colorado Street Bridge, Pasadena, CA: Designer for modifications of historic 1913 arch bridge • Fashion Island Boulevard Bridge, San Mateo, CA: Quality Control Engineer for 8 -span bridge • Salinas River Bridge, San Ardo, CA: Quality Control Engineer for strategy of 1,650 -foot bridge Caltrans On -Call Seismic Retrofit Ea_nerience • Riverside Blvd Bridge, Los Angeles, CA: QC Project Manager for 5 -span historic bridge • Local Agency Seismic Retrofit, San Mateo Co., CA: Project Manager for 7 local agency bridges • Southwest Expressway OC, San Jose, CA: Assistant PM for 7 -span connector ramp • Virginia Street UP, San Jose, CA: Assistant PM for 4 -span trough girder SPTCo. Bridge • Corte Madera Bridges, Marin Co., CA: Project Engineer for preliminary design of 4 viaducts • 17/280 West Connector Viaduct, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for portion of 10 -span bridge • Civic Center Drive OH, San Diego, CA: Project Engineer for 4 bridges over San Diego LRT • Harbor Drive On -Ramp UC, San Diego, CA: Designer for 3 -span bridge • Feather River Bridge, Yuba City, CA: Designer for 1500 -foot viaduct bridge • Stockton Avenue OH, San Jose, CA.: Designer for 13 -span, steel and concrete girder bridge • Agnew UP, Santa Clara, CA: Quality Control Engineer for 2 -span t trough girder SPTCo. bridge • Coleman Avenue OH, San Jose, CA: Quality Control Engineer for 11 -span bridge Rail Bridge Experience • SB101/NB85 Overhead, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for 3 -span overhead over UPRR • Lone Tree UP, Brentwood, CA: Project Manager for a grade separation study • Oakley Grade Separations, Oakley, CA: Project Manager for two grade separation studies • Calle De Cisco OH, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for 3 -span overhead over UPRR • Commuter Rail/BART/LRT Study, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for feasibility study • Bailey Ave OH, San Jose, CA: Project Manager for 3 -span overhead and grade separation • Sand Creek Road UP, Brentwood, CA: PM for preliminary design of 2 -span Union Pacific bridge • San Antonio Pedestrian UP, MouniAin View, CA: Project Manager for repair project • Valley Blvd OH, Ontario, CA: Project Manager for 2 -span overhead over spur line • Jack Tone Road OH, Ripon, CA: Project Manager for 3 -span bridge over Union Pacific • Old Orchard Road UP, Martinez, CA: Assistant Project Engineer for 4 -span AT &SF bridge Box Culverts and Hydraulic Structures • Amber Grove, Concord, CA: PM for various storm drainage junction boxes • Discovery Bay West - Lakeshore, Discovery Bay, CA: PM for junction box and sewer crossing • Terrabay, South San Francisco, CA: Project Manager for detention basin • Fairview Avenue at Sand Creek, Brentwood, CA: PM for lengthening a large box culvert • Cisco Hydraulic Structures, San Jose, CA: PM for dam, weirs, boxes, culverts and walls • Gallery Walk, Pleasant Hill, CA: Project Manager for detention basin • Brentwood Park Detention Basins., Brentwood, CA: PM for underground basins • Apple Hill Drive at Marsh Creek, Brentwood, CA: Designer for two cell box culverts • Newton Drive at Marsh Creek, Brentwood, CA: Designer for two cell box culverts Uy 7.0 1--9 ki Registration Education Responsibilities Project Experience DZUNG H. NGUYEN Engineering Manager Civil Engineer, State of California, C56803 B.S. Architectural Engineering, The Odense Engineering Academy, Denmark Responsibilities as Engineering Man<<ger include leading the structural analysis and design, development of construction details, production of contract documents, quality control, coordination with client, contractor, and subconsultants, and field review of construction. Design Experience • SFO Inbound/Outbound Ramps, San Francisco, CA: Lead Engineer for the Advanced Planning Study, Type Selection Report and design of five new inbound/outbound ramps for the San Francisco International Airport. • Airport Light Rail Transit Project, San Francisco, CA: Structural Engineer for preparing plans and calculations for approximately 7.8 miles of aerial structure, including the Westside Package, Alignment Layout for the East Loop, Middle Loop, North Extensions and Second Phase Alignment for the San Francisco Airport Light Rail Transit Project. • Arch Road UC and Arch Road OC (Temp) Bridge, Stockton, CA: Project Engineer responsible for preparing contact plans, specifications, calculations and estimates for 165 meter cast -in -place prestressed concrete box girder bridge with various stage constructions. Also responsible for preparing contract plans, specifications, calculations and estimates for a 34 meter steel girder for the Arch Road Overcrossing temporary structure. • Valley Boulevard Bridge, San Bernardino County, CA: Project Engineer for a 135 -foot and 175 - foot long cast -in -place prestressed concrete box girder bridge structure over San Sevaine Channel and UPRR spurline. • C515 -Light Rail East Extension, VTA: Project Engineer for design of approximately 1,000 feet of retaining walls for the 1 -680/ Capitol Avenue Undercrossing. Construction costs for the project were $1.1 million. • C520 Light Rail East Extension, VTA: Lead Design Check Engineer for a two -mile aerial guideway structure, including design of Great Mall Station frame and Montague Station frame. Also acted as the lead coordinator over all engineering disciplines for the structural and construction interface. Construction cost for the project was $52 million dollars. • Seismic Retrofit of Six Bridges, Shasta County, CA: Project Engineer for developing the seismic strategy and retrofit design of six existing bridges (four steel girder and two reinforced concrete box girder bridges). • Seismic Retrofit of Eight Bridges, San Luis Obispo, CA: Project Engineer for the retrofit design and QA &QC for plans and calculations for eight bridges. • Foothill Boulevard Undercrossing, Los Altos, CA: Structural Engineer for the retrofit design and widening of an existing LRT bridge. • Tasman Corridor Light Rail Extension, Santa Clara County, CA: Quality Control Engineer for a 16 -mile segment of the LRT. • Mulholland Drive Overcrossing, Contra Costa County, CA: Quality Control Engineer for the seismic retrofit design. • Washington Street Overcrossing, Contra Costa County, CA: Structural Engineer for the independent check of the seismic retrofit. • 12th and 14th Street Overcrossing, Contra Costa County, CA: Structural Engineer for the review of the collapse mechanism analysis. Project Experience (Continued) • Storstroms County Highway Department, Denmark: Project Engineer for the realignment of a 2.6 -km, 4 -lane State Highway Project. • C520 Light Rail East Extension, VTA, CA: Construction support for the Light Rail Project including checking shoring schemes, falsework design and construction sequences • SB101/N85 Connector Separation - VTA: Project Engineer preparing the Advanced Planning Study and Type Selection Report of this connector separation. Also acted as lead Structural Engineer for the design of a 145 meter cast -in -place prestressed concrete box girder bridge structure over UPRR and Monterey Highway. • LA Metro Red Line, Los Angeles, CA: Structural Engineer /QA &QC for plans and calculations for the First/Boyle Metro Station, including appendages and entrance structure. • BART Dublin - Pleasanton Extension (DPI), Alameda County, CA: Structural Engineer for the design of two cast -in -place prestressed concrete box girder bridges. • Caltrans I -880 Bridge Replacement Project, Oakland, CA: Structural Engineer for the design of two cast -in -place prestressed concrete box girder bridges. • Seismic Retrofit of Eight Bridges, Santa Cruz County, CA: Project Engineer for the retrofit design and evaluation of eight existing bridges (six steel girder bridges and two reinforced concrete box girder bridges). Construction Experience • Temporary Support for Towers T2, T3 and T4 Replacement - Northern Approach Viaduct - Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, CA: Project Engineer working for the Contractor preparing plans, erection sequences, jacking schedules and sensitivity analysis for replacing existing towers T2, T3 and T4 for the Northern Approach Viaduct - Golden Gate Bridge. • Bearing Replacement at N2 & N11 - Northern Approach Viaduct - Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, CA: Project Engineer working for the Contractor preparing plans, erection sequences, jacking schedules and sensitivity analysis for replacing the existing bearings with seismic isolated bearings for the Northern Approach Viaduct - Golden Gate Bridge. • SFIA - Steel Girder Erection Sequences, Contract 5700 -East Loop - SFIA: Project Engineer working for the Contractor preparing temporary support plans and erection sequences for approximately 2,400 feet of steel box girders at the San Francisco International Airport. Also acted as special inspector on this prc ject. �C� Registration Education Responsibilities Project Experience GREG KENNING Senior Engineer Civil Engineer, State of California, C49258 B.S. Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA Responsibilities as Senior Engineer include leading the structural analysis and design, development of construction details, production of contract documents, and quality control. Projects which Greg Kenning has been directly involved with include: Highway Bridge Experience • Route 85/87 Interchange, San Jose:, CA: Project Engineer responsible for the design of the Southbound 87/Northbound 85 Connector. The proposed bridge is a 335 -meter (1,100 -foot) long, six -span post- tensioned concrete box girder structure with single column bents. • Taylor Street Signal Structures, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for the Design of four steel double truss overhead sign structures and the quality control engineer for a 55.5 meter (182 -foot) steel double truss signal structure for the proposed Taylor Street Urban Interchange on Route 87. • Kings Creek Bridge, Santa Cruz County, CA: Project Engineer for bridge replacement project for the county of Santa Cruz. The replacement bridge is a 21 meter (69 -foot) long single span precast prestressed voided slab with a cast -in -place composite toping slab. • Bernal Avenue Bridge, Pleasanton, CA: Project Engineer for a widening of the Bernal Avenue Bridge over the Arroyo Del Valle Creek the bridge is a 284 - footlong 4 -span precast prestressed voided slab with a cast -in -place composite toping slab. • Tassajara Creek Bridge at Central Parkway, Dublin, CA: Quality Control Engineer for a 158 - foot long three -span precast prestressed voided slab with a cast -in -place composite toping slab. The bents of this structure are supported on cast -in- steel -shell (CISS) pile extensions. • Guadalupe River Bridge Widening at Trimble Road, San Jose, CA Assistant Project Engineer for the seismic retrofit/widening of an existing 66 -foot wide by 210 -foot long 5 -span concrete T- beam structure. • San Joaquin River Bridge, Firebaugh, CA: Quality Control Engineer for the replacement of the 13th Street bridge over the San Joaquin River. The replacement bridge is designed as a 572 -foot long 4 -span post- tensioned concrete parabolic haunched box girder. • Eagle Ridge Bridges, Gilroy, CA: Project Engineer for the design of one of three post- tensioned concrete box girder bridges designed for the Eagle Ridge Development. Responsible for producing the project specifications and providing construction support for all three bridges. • Valley Boulevard Bridge, City of Industry, CA: Quality Control Engineer for the replacement of the Valley Boulevard bridge over the San Gabriel River. The replacement structure is a 943 -foot long, 11 -span concrete box girder bridge. • Constitution Avenue Bridge, Fairfield, CA: Project Engineer for the design of a 60 -foot long single -span precast prestressed voided slab bridge over Laurel Creek in the Paradise Valley Estates Development. Also acted as the Resident Engineer for this structure during construction. • Utility Overcrossing Replacement,, Route 280, Daly City, CA: Quality Control Engineer for a utility overcrossing over Route 280. The proposed bridge is an 86 metric (282 -foot) long 3 -span post- tensioned concrete trough structure with two column bents. • Hedding Street Bridge, San Jose, CA: Provided construction support for the replacement of the Hedding Street Bridge over the Guadalupe River with two post- tensioned concrete box girder bridges; a 186 -foot long 2 -spzm structure and a 106 -foot long single -span structure. • Los Gatos Creek Pedestrian Bridge, Los Gatos, CA: Design and construction support of two 140 -foot long bow -string type bridges over Los Gatos Creek in Campbell Park. Project Experience (Continued) Seismic Retrofit Experience • Echandia Overhead Off-Ramp, Route 5, Los Angeles, CA: Project Engineer for seismic retrofit of a 450 -foot long, 8 -span, reinforced concrete box girder structure with multiple column bents • Meridian Avenue Overcrossing, Route 280, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer responsible for developing the strategy for the seismic retrofit of a 277 -foot long, 2 -span post- tensioned concrete box girder structure with a single column bent • Bird Avenue On -Ramp Overcrossing, Route 280, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer responsible for developing the strategy for the seismic retrofit of a 301 -foot long, 3 -span post- tensioned concrete box girder structure with single column bents. • UPRR Underpass over Paramount Boulevard, Pico Rivera: Project Engineer responsible for developing the strategy for the seismic retrofit of a 114 -foot long 2 -span steel girder railroad underpass as part of the Los Angeles County Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program. • Sanborn Road Overhead, Salinas, CA: Project Engineer for the seismic retrofit and barrier replacement of two 850 -foot long, 21 -span adjacent structures. Currently acting as the structure representative for the duration of construction. • Lexington Reservoir Bridge at Alma Bridge Road, Santa Clara County, CA: Acted as the structure representative during construction of the seismic retrofit of this 225', 4 -span steel girder structure with multiple column bents. r Registration Education Responsibilities Project Experience JOSEPH P. GUTIERREZ Senior Engineer Civil Engineer, State of California, C53273 B.S. Civil Engineering, San Jose State'University, San Jose, CA Responsibilities as Senior Engineer include leading the structural analysis and design, development of construction details, production of contract documents, and quality control. Projects which Joe Gutierrez has been directly involved with include: Bridge Design Experience • Sand Creek Central, Brentwood, CA.: Project Engineer for design of a complicated extension of an existing 12'x24' box culvert, a 3 single span slab pedestrian undercrossing bridge, and a 9'x12' pedestrian undercrossing box structure. • Martinez Marsh Restoration Project Pedestrian Bridges, Martinez, CA: Project Engineer for design of a new precast prestressed voided slab bridge with 40' simply supported spans. • Brentwood Park, Andrew Molera State Park, and San Felipe Road Pedestrian Bridges: Project Engineer involved design of foundation structures for pre- fabricated steel truss bridges -of 52', 40' and 100' lengths respectively. • Bailey Ave Bridge, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for design of a new 489 -foot four -span cast -in- place post- tensioned box girder bridge over Coyote Creek. • Bailey Ave OH, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for design of a new 260 -foot three -span cast -in- place mild steel reinforced grade separation with a precast/prestressed I girder drop span at UPRR, • Bailey Ave OC, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for Advance Planning Study of new 303 400t two - span overcrossing over Highway 101. • McKee Commercial Center Driveway Bridge, San Jose, CA: Design Engineer for a 60 -foot single span cast -in -place prestressed slab bridge for a developer. Vertical constraints required the use of a tapered structure depth. • Sand Creek Road UP, Brentwood, CA: Project Engineer for a proposed two -span underpass. The railroad required the bridge construction to be completed in a 14 day period, reducing the closure of the tracks. The railroad later declined to allow closure of the tracks, thus halting the project. • Commuter Rail/BART/LRT Study, San Jose, CA: Project Engineer for feasibility study to grade separate a commuter rail corridor (or future BART corridor) and the Tasman East LRT line. • Broadway - Brommer Pedestrian Extension, Santa Cruz, CA: Project Engineer for an alternative study for a 3,600 -foot pathway, including two pedestrian bridges over steep ravines. • Jack Tone Road/Hwy 99 Interchange, Ripon, CA: Design Engineer for a 418 -foot three -span overhead structure over UPRR, two roadways and a canal for a San Joaquin County Interchange. • Arizona Street Bridge, Union City, CA: Project Engineer for a 76 -foot single -span cast -in -place prestressed box girder bridge for a developer. • Water Street Bridge, Santa Cruz, CA: Project Engineer for the HBRR- funded replacement of a portion and seismic retrofit of another portion of this bridge over the San Lorenzo River. The structure incorporated aesthetic superstructure haunches and parabolically stepped pier walls. • Rancho Mission Roadway Bridge, San Diego, CA: Project Engineer for the relocation of a roadway bridge due to the light rail extension project Mission Valley West. • Route 73 Moulton Parkway Undercrossing, CA: Assistant Engineer for the design of a 328 -foot three -span, cast -in -place post - tensioned concrete box girder bridge. Project Experience (Continue) • West Cliff Drive at Swanton Blvd, Santa Cruz, CA: Project Engineer for a 140 -foot long soil nail wall repair of a storm - damaged coastal bluff. • West Cliff Drive at Woodrow, Santa Cruz, CA: Project Engineer for a 200 -foot long soil nail wall repair of a storm - damaged coastal bluff. Seismic Retrofit Experience • Big Sandy Creek Bridge at Indian Valley Road, Monterey County, CA: Project Engineer for the seismic retrofit of a six-span steel girder bridge with concrete decking supported on pier walls. • Nacimiento Creek Bridge -at Naciimiento- Ferguson Road, Monterey County, CA: Project engineer for the seismic retrofit of a two -span rail flat car bridge with a steel pier. • San Diego- Coronado Bay Bridge, San Diego, CA: Assistant Project Manager for the seismic retrofit of a 9,800 -foot long toll bridge crossing. Responsible for assembling scope of services, cost estimate worksheets, monthly progress reports, communication with design team and Client, and preparing presentation material. Also responsible for the production of retrofit plan sheets, strategy development of the Easterly Ramp structures, and the independent check of the ramp structures footing retrofits. • Colfax Avenue POC Retrofit, Los Angeles, CA: Project Engineer for the seismic retrofit of a steel through truss bridge, including the City's first application of a friction plate damper. • Ash Creek Bridge at US 101, Cloverdale, CA: Project Engineer for the seismic retrofit of a 1932 T -beam bridge. • I -280 Southern Freeway Viaduct, Independent Check, SF, CA: Seismic retrofit design check. -.= =_ W& SONNY W. A U Staff Engineer Registration Civil Engineer, State of California, C63513 Education B.S. Civil/Structural Engineering, University of California at Berkeley Responsibilities Responsibilities as a Staff Engineer include layout of structural drawings, structural design and analysis, production of contract documents, quantity estimates, supervision of draftsmen, and review of other engineer's work for in -house quality control. Project Projects which Sonny Au has been directly involved with as an Staff Engineer include: Experience • Eden Shores Boulevard Overhead, Alameda County, CA: A 4 -span overhead structure with a concrete deck on prestressed precast concrete bulb -tee girders support by seat abutments and 2- column bents on 7 feet diameter CISS concrete piles. • 101- 85/S101 HOV Connector Separation, Santa Clara County, CA: Provided review and check of original design of this 4 -span prestressed cast -in -place box girder for in -house quality control. • Route 85/87 Interchange Project, Santa Clara, CA: Project includes as -built analysis and retrofit design of the existing 13 -span Southbound 85 Connector and design of a new 6 -span Southbound 87/Northbound 85 Connector. • Uvas Creek Bridge at Bonfante Gardens, Santa Clara County, CA: A 2 -span cast -in -place prestressed box girder bridge supported by seat abutments and a single - column bent. • Greenyard Street Bridge at silver Creek, Santa Clara County, CA: A 103 feet simple -span cast - in -place prestressed box girder bridge with abutment diaphragms supported on concrete spread footings • Tasman East Light Rail Project — Aeri4l Guideway Structure, Santa Clara County, CA: Two - story access structures, total 4, located along the aerial guideway; relevant design standard from the '97 UBC were utilized in design. • Nacimiento Lake Bridge over San Antonio River, Monterey County, CA: A 2 -span 240 long cast -in -place box girder structure with seat type abutments and single column bent supported an CISS pile. -.= =_ W& HNTB Chip P. Mallare Jr., PE Structural Engineer Education MS /1990 /Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University BS /1987 /Civil Engineering, Marquette University Professional Registrations 1993 /Civil Engineering: California No. C050659 Professional Background Entered the profession in 1991; joined HNTB in 1991 Professional Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers Society of American Military Engineers Publications "Displacement Ductility Analysis of the Petaluma River Bridge," Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Structural Engineers Association of California Convention, Scottsdale, Arizona, September 29 - October 2, pp. 143 -150. "Bridge Seismic Retrofitting ", Proceedings of the 1993 Surface Transportation Workshop, October 1 - October 3, Houston, Texas. "Stress- Sprain Behavior of Spirally Confined Concrete," Master of Science Thesis, submitted to North Carolina State University Graduate School, Raleigh, NC, 1990. "Load Resistance Factor Design of Beams- to-Column Flange Connections for Restrained Members — Design Aids," Structural Engineering Practice, vol. 4, no. 1 -2, 1987, pp 19-66. Professional Experience Mr. Mallare has over 12 years of experience in structural and highway engineering design, engineering management and program management. His experience also includes both bridge construction assistance and construction inspection. Mr. Mallare's previous projects include all aspects of highway and bridge design, such as plan preparation, specification writing and estimating. His background includes extensive bridge retrofit work, as well as new bridge design. Mr. Mallare has also performed construction inspection work on bridge retrofit projects for Caltrans and was responsible for Task Orders and all on -call construction engineering during HNTB's Seismic Bridge Retrofit Contract for Caltrans. Measure A/B Highway Program, Santa Clara County, CA Design Coordinator responsible for overseeing all aspects of the Route 85/101 (S) Interchange Project, the Route 85/87 Interchange Project, and the Route 152 Safety Improvement Project, from the environmental phase through final PS&E and construction. He is also directly responsible for the oversight of all structures work for the entire Highway Program. Mr. Mallare's role also includes coordination between the various design disciplines such as environmental, civil, electrical, structural, and architectural firms, coordination between the designers and the reviewing agencies such as Caltrans, Santa Clara County Water District:, The City of San Jose, other local agencies and environmental review agencies. HNTB is part of a joint venture team with Hatch Mott McDonald to NNTB perform Program Management for the Santa Clara County Measure A/B Highway Program. This ambitions $600 million Highway Program includes ten main projects with improvements on nearly every major freeway within Santa Clara County. The: Program Management team performs oversight on ten prime consultants and over 40 subc:onsultants. Del Amo Boulevard Overcrossing, Carson, CA Mr. Mallare was the project engineer for this 1,000 -foot long CIP P/S box girder bridge. Key issues which influenced the design included substantial variations in substructure heights, changes in soil conditions, and large spectral accelerations. Unique! tapered pier walls were designed for the bents located in the Dominguez Channel to limit scour and to avoid conflicts with utilities which could not be economically relocated. Limits on construction time within the Dominguez Channel also impacted the design of the structure. BART SFO Extension, San Mateo County, CA Deputy Chief Structural Engineer responsible for design and design oversight of the subway box sections and the aerial structures. The seismic design of the aerial structures included standard Caltrans practices as well as complex non - linear time history evaluations. Mr. Mallare's role also included coordination with other design disciplines such as civil, architecture, environmental, and systems design. He also provided design oversight for the station, ventilation, and other miscellaneous structures. The BART SFO Extension Project includes 8 miles of underground subway and over one mile of aerial bridge structures that will serve the San Francisco Airport 1-880 Replacement, Oakland, CA Design engineer for design and construction of three Caltrans viaducts connecting the Oakland /San Francisco Bay Bridge to 1 -880. PS &E documents were prepared for a three -lane north connector, a two -lane south connector and a future HOV expansion. Mr. Mallare was responsible for initial sizing and field splice locations of the welded steel 1- girders for both the north and south connectors to minimize construction and material costs. He was also determined the column and footing placement in a congested railroad yard to minimize track relocation and to provide optimal span arrangements. Carquinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Contra Costa/Solano County, CA Mr. Mallare served as lead analysis engineer for the West Approach structure. He was also the lead engineer for analysis and design of the "B" Line Off -Ramp structure, a 1,135 foot long deck truss bridge with complex geometry. As lead engineer, Mr. Mallare was responsible for all PS &E efforts, supervising a design group of 10 engineers and CARD technicians. HNTB was a key member of the team contracted by Caltrans to provide performance. acceptance criteria, PS &E packages and design support during construction. Young Chong Suspension Bridge, Seoul Korea Lead Design Engineer responsible for investigating 'various cable spinning techniques and suspension bridge construction procedures in order to reduce the overall construction time and costs associated with the Young Chong Suspension Bridge in Seoul Korea. The 1,800 -foot long main span suspension bridge consisted of two decks, an upper deck to carry roadway traffic and a lower deck for rail traffic. A number of options were developed, one of which included a unique cable erection technique specifically tailored to this particuilar structure which would maximize the efficiency of existing Korean technology and equipment. HNTB conducted a study to provide the cable engineering services for the proposed suspension bridge linking the new Seoul Airport on Young Chong Island to the City of Inchon, Korea. HNTB HNTB Corporation is a multi - disciplinary design firm, founded in 1914, with a network of over 60 offices and 3,000 employees throughout the United States. HNTB provides comprehensive architecture, engineering and planning services to public and private clients throughout the United States and worldwide. Core service areas include: Bridges Transportation • Architecture • Aviation • Urban Design & Planning • Construction Services HNTB's commitment to providing our clients with design excellence has earned us worldwide acclaim for numerous projects. Currently ranked #1 as a pure design firm in the nation by Engineering News Record, HNTB has a long and proud tradition of quality professional services to its clients. The greatest commitment we make to our clients is that of excellence in design and that commitment has earned HNTB worldwide acclaim for many of our projects. HNTB's excellence is affirmed by the receipt from the American Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC) of three Grand Conceptor awards in the past six years. Each of our clients receives professional services from a select group of local professionals specifically assembled to meet the challenges of each project. We affirm our commitment that each and every client receives the local attention that is critical to the successful delivery of their project — from contract signing through planning and design to construction. To this day the quality service exemplify 1bY� extend beyond technical scientific eaccurary to represents total which our work is performed. Quality and ex eY solution, clearly envisioned, founded on the appropriate technology, and integrated to a uniform whole. From small technical studies to major program assignments, client satisfaction is our primary objective. Bridges HNTB is a leader in the design of both concrete and steel long -span and movable bridges, having been involved in the design of various bridges worldwide. Locally, we understand the challenge of developing a comprehensive design that can withstand a thorough review by Caltrans. We have designed over 200 Caltrans bridge projects, all complying with their review requirements in an expedited process. Services include: • Inspection and rehabilitation • Segmental bridge design • Long -span bridge design • Hard and soft ground tunnel design Movable bridge design • Bridge replacement design Interchange bridges and viaducts • Construction management IHMYB' Robert A. Stromsted, PE Principal -in- Charge Education \Certifications ECE Construction Management — Stanford University (1980) MS Civil Engineering — Stanford University (1979) BS Civil Engineering — U.S. Coast Guard Academy (1975) Registrations Civil Engineering - CA #0035907 Professional Experience Mr. Stromsted has 27 years of engineering experience in management and engineering for a variety of transportation and public works projects including highways, bridges, railroads, and rail transit. He frequently serves as the Officer -in- Charge and Project Manager for both on -call and long -term engineering projects, working closely with the client to ensure availability of all personnel resources. In this capacity, Bob is responsive to the client's flexible staffing needs, including maintaining Caltrans -savvy engineering and construction support: staff. In addition, his Project Manager role on numerous Northern California freeway projects gives him a thorough understanding of Caltrans design standards and practices. Mr. Stromsted is experienced with preparing and processing PSRs, PRs, EDs, PS&Es, and is experienced in Program and Construction Management. Caltrain JPB On -Call Civil Engineering, San Mateo, San Francisco and Santa Clara Counties, CA Principal -in- charge and project manager for on -call contract to provide civil engineering services to the Peninsula Joint Powers Board for Caltrain facility maintenance, repair and improvement projects. Principal In Charge of Diridon Station Platform Rehabilitation design, bridge investigations and design for the replacement of railroad bridges, the Dumbarton Railroad Bridge project study, Colma Creek Bridge and channel replacement study, and construction. He was primarily responsible for a deliverable project that involved the resources of HNTB's full service capabilities. Santa Cruz -Los Gatos Rail Corridor, Santa Cruz, CA Principal and Project Manager of feasibility study of passenger rail service alternatives. Study included patronage forecasting, inspection and evaluation of the 27 -mile historic rail corridor between the Vasona Junction and Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, development of an operating plan, technology comparison including LRT, DMU, and conventional commuter rail equipment; conceptual engineering for rail route and 7 tunnels, station planning, capital and operating cost estimating, and a public involvement program. Received commendation from the project's Joint Policy Board consisting of the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission, the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District, and the Santa Clara County Transportation Agency. Measure A/B Highway Program, Santa Clara, CA Officer -in- Charge for this $500 million highway program. Also JV Board Member leading contract administration for the Highway Management Team. Works closely with client to provide personnel resources. Responsive to VTA flexible staffing needs, including providing Caltrans -savvy engineering and construction management personnel. Assists with local agency coordination and supervises administration of subconsultant contract management. Program covers 10 major state highway projects involving Caltrans oversight, including 1 -880 Widening, US 101 Widening, Route 85/101 Interchange in south San Jose, Route 85/101 Interchange in Mountain View, Route 237/880 1Hrj=rB1 Interchange in Milpitas, Route 17 Improvements in Campbell, Route 152 Improvements, and Route 87 HOV lanes. Devil's Slide Tunnel, Pacifica, CA Served as backup to Project Principal on engineering support and project oversight. Services involved "type - selection" of a 4,000 -foot tunnel (ported- to-portal,) with 1,000 -foot approach roads on each side. This comprehensive study was completed within budget on a fast -track schedule. Route 87 Freeway, Julian to Route 101, San Jose, CA Project Manager for City of San Jose and Caltrans project management services during planning, environmental clearance, design, and construction. Managed design, ROW and agency coordination activities. Responsible for visual design guidelines, specifications, public information, coordination with the Santa Clara Valley Water District, permit coordination and traffic studies. Responsible for project development including preliminary engineering, Project Report and environmental documentation. $200 - million project converts an existing 3 -mile, 4 -lane roadway to a 6 -lane freeway with three grade - separated interchanges, three unde,,rcrossings, a freeway separation structure, and two bridges over the Guadalupe River. Project included Route 101 freeway and interchange modifications. Highway 25 Bypass, Hollister, CA Principal -in- Charge of the San Benito County Measure A Authority project. Services included preliminary engineering, funding strategies, permits, and PS & E for a 3 -mile urban arterial. Coordinated with Caltrans, the City of Hollister, and San Benito COG. Route 118 /Madera Interchange, Simi Valley, CA QA/QC manager of PS & E for Interchange improvements including ramp modifications, freeway bridge widening, drainage improvements, local street improvements, and landscaping. Route 101 Auxiliary Lanes, San Mateo, CA QA/QC manager of implementation plan and preliminary engineering for widening of Route 101 between Marsh Road and Route 92. Project included freeway widening, bridge widening over creeks, culvert extensions, drainage facilities, TOS (ITS) modifications, soundwalls and retaining walls. Route 92 Operational Improvements, San Mateo County, CA Principal -in- Charge of PSR, preliminary engineering, environmental documentation, Project Report and final design (PS &E) for the San Mateo County - transportation Authority, under Caltrans oversight. Project included bridge widening /replacement, realignment, drainage improvements, extensive retaining walls and grading along this scenic highway. Route 23711 -880 Interchange, Milpitas, CA Project manager and officer -in- charge of design on this major freeway - to-freeway interchange for the VTA and Caltrans. Project includes an HOV direct connector viaduct, braided ramps, critical construction -phase traffic handling and construction staging. Mission/Foothill Corridor Study, Hayward, CA QA/QC manager of 5.3 -mile corridor that included preliminary design, urban design, cost estimating, traffic operations analyses, right -of -way studies, altematives analysis, environmental assessment, project implementation and funding program, project renderings, Caltrans and City of Hayward coordination, public and City Council presentations, and a final report. H John Litzinger, PE Civil Engineer Education MBA /1994 /Business Administration /Santa Clara University BSCE /1987 /Civil Engineering/Texas A&M University Professional Registrations 1991 /Civil Engineer /CA C047545, Exp. 12/31/03 Professional Experience John Litzinger has 15 years of civil engineering experience, including working with utilities engineering design and construction. His past 12 years were spent working in the South Bay, giving him a solid background of coordination with local cities and agencies. In addition, his project manager role on the Vasona LRT /Diridon Station in San Jose gave him hands -on experience in coordinating with Caltrain, and involved construction of a cut - and -cover tunnel through an active Caltrain rail yard. Willow- Cambridge Bike /Pedestrian Undercrossing, Menlo Park, CA Inter - Agency Coordinator on this feasibility study for a Caltrain pedestrian undercrossing. Work scope includes providing draft of a construction and maintenance agreement between the City, JPB and Caltrain. Vasona LRT /Diridon Station, San Jose, CA Project manager for construction management overnight on behalf of the PCJPB. The project includes construction of a cut - and -cover tunnel through the active Railroad yard. HNTB duties include review and approval of weekly Site Specific Work Plans; coordination meetings with the VTA, Contractor, JPB and Amtrak to discuss upcoming work in the yard and the effect it may have on operations and maintaining commuter rail service; monitoring of Site Specific Work Plans; invoicing; document control; and administrative duties. In total, the VTA will administer eight contracts over a three -year period to complete the project. Washington Avenue Improvements, Sunnyvale, CA Project manager responsible for managing and coordinating the design of improvements to widen a 800 linear foot section of Washington Avenue that will accommodate six (6) lanes. To assist the City with an emergency project, temporary striping plans were prepared and provided to the City with one week from Notice -to- Proceed. A subsequent reconstruction project totaling an additional 800 linear feet was added to the project during design. Overall, the work will include the design work includes roadway widening, bike and pedestrian paths, grading, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, retaining walls and drainage structures. Mr. Litzinger also directed 1he subconsultant performing the traffic engineering work which includes design modifications to two (2) signals. Measure A/B Highway Program, Santa Clara VTA„ CA Performed construetability reviews for this $500 million highway program, including 10 main projects with improvements on nearly every major freeway within Santa Clara County. F-1NTB Airline Highway, Hollister, CA Project manager for design of Airline Highway widening from Union Street to Enterprise Road intersection. Plans were prepared in metric units following Caltrans standards and coordinated with development of subdivision plans, which were designed in English units. Project coordination was done with Caltrans for an encroachment permit and with the City for planning of ultimate improvements to the area. Widening required relocation of existing overhead facilities and connections to existing street utilities. 1-880 Replacement, Oakland, CA Provided sanitary sewer design for this $695 million replacement project that included rebuilding 3.8 miles of 1 -880 west of the original freeway and extending a 1.3 -mile connector to the Bay Bridge. Devil's Slide Tunnel, Pacifica, CA Senior engineer on this PS&E for a 4,000 -ft tunnel (portal -to- portal) with 1,000 feet approach roads on each side. VTA Southern Gateway Transportation and Land Use Study, CA Senior engineer for this study to identify projects along Routes 101, 152, 156, 25, 129 from 85/101 in South SJ to Salinas. Responsible for 3rd party agreements and agency coordination. Study will incorporate land -use policies and issues from over 20 agencies including city and county general plans. Study will result in an implementation plan for $240 million in highway projects within the study area over the next 20 years. 1- 238/1 -580 from 1-880 to Redwood Avenue, Hayward, CA Assisted in preparation of a Caltrans Draft Project Study Report (PSR) for widening 1 -238 to 8 lanes with auxiliary lanes and truckway. PSR included 4 plan and profile studies with cost estimates. SR- 84/Thomton Avenue Reconstruction, Fremont, CA Assisted in preparation of Caltrans Project Report and preliminary design for pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction. Project required extensive coordination with local utility companies. SR- 851Almaden Expressway to South Bascom Avenue, San Jose, CA Assisted in preparation of PS&E for design of three miles of 6 -lane freeway including two interchanges. Funded by the Traffic Authority, project involved extensive coordination with Caltrans and City of San Jose. This below -grade cut section of SR -85 involved extensive relocation of existing utilities along adjacent streets, in addition to storm drainage for freeway. SR- 101 /Capitol Expressway to Tully Road, San Jose, CA Participated in Caltrans PSR for modification of existing northbound on -ramp and auxiliary lane. 1 -580 Greenville Road Interchange, Livermore, CA Assisted in preparation of a Caltrans PSR for interchange modifications, including plan and profile studies for three alternative configurations to improve projected levels of service. SR -1 and SR-84, San Mateo County, CA Performed construction inspection of a maintenance project to re -stripe over 10 miles of state highway from Devils Slide to Pescadero and Woodside. H B Gregory F. DeMond, AIA Bridge Architect Education BArch /1971 /Kansas State University Registration 1979 /Architecture /KS # 2364 Expires: June 30, 2004 Professional Experience Mr. DeMond, is an architectural /engineering designer with 30 years of experience in the development and presentation of aesthetic design solutions for bridge and transportation projects. 2nd Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Tacoma, WA As senior architect, Mr. DeMond was responsible for the development and coordination of aesthetic design and architectural treatment for a $350 million, 5,200 -foot suspension bridge including interchange, toll plaza structures and retaining walls as part of the $700 million SR 16 transportation corridor. Oostanaula River Pedestrian Bridge, Rome, GA As lead architect, Mr. DeMond was responsible for the development and coordination of aesthetic design and arch itectural'treatment for steel and concrete structure types, decorative railing and aesthetic lighting for 12 -foot wide bridge with a 300 -foot main span. 1-95,1-395,1-495 Interchanges, Springfield, VA Responsible for the development and coordination of aesthetic design and architectural treatment for steel and concrete structure types, piers and retaining walls. The $275 million project involves the improvement of two major interchanges with approximately 45 bridge structures located within the Washington D.C. beltway. Northwest 12th Avenue Bridge, Miami, FL Bridge architect responsible for aesthetic design concepts for the approximately $25 million replacement of a National Register eligible 70 year old Bascule bridge over the Miami River that is adjacent a historical district and part of a major urban corridor. Hell Canyon Bridge, Custer County, SD Responsible for the development and coordination of aesthetic design and architectural treatment for steel and concrete structure types for 550 meter long bridge in an environmentally sensitive setting. Lovejoy Ramp Replacement, Portland, OR Developed aesthetic design and architectural treatment alternatives for a replacement ramp connection to the historically significant Broadway Bridge, which has been considered eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. FIN TB Timberline Road Bridge, Fort Collins, CO Bridge architect responsible for developing both steel and concrete bridge type alternatives for a new 360 -400 foot, 6 -lane (ultimate) crossing over the Cache La Poudre River. Also responsible for coordination of design charrette architectural treatment options and computer photomontage exhibits for client/public approval. U.S. 20 over the Iowa River, Hardin County, IA Bridge architect responsible for developing alternative bridge concepts for a new crossing of U.S. 20 over the Iowa River in an environmentally sensitive location. The selected alternative is a 460 -meter long, six -span, launched steel 1- girder structure with cast -in -place concrete piers with an estimated cost of $16 million. Mississippi River Crossing, Greenville, MS Bridge architect responsible for preparation of bridge type alternative exhibits and final aesthetic design of $100 million crossing over the Mississippi River. East Topeka Interchange Bridges, Topeka, KS As bridge architect, Mr. DeMond developed alternate pier types for interchange comprised of 11 bridges, with overall spans that ranged 300 to 1,000 feet in length Kansas River Bridge, Manhattan, KS Responsible for aesthetic and conceptual design development/presentation exhibits for replacement bridge and interchange. 1-1r#41TB Evan Supcoff, AIA Bridge Architect Education MArch, Yale University, Architecture BA, Harvard University, Social Studies Professional Registration Registered Architects: NY & PA Professional Affiliations American Institute of Architects Professional Experience Mr. Supcoff is Principal Architect and serves as Director of Architecture for the New York office as well as a national resource for transportation architecture at HNTB. Mr. Supcoff is an able manager and team leader, equally committed to the highest level of design, documentation and communication. Mr. Supcoff is currently overseeing a variety of transportation- related projects being performed by the New York architecture studio. Areas of specialty include aviation, transit and bridge architecture. The group has developed a national specialty in the area of bridge architecture. Working in collaboration with HNTB bridge engineers and urban design professionals, Mr. Supcoffs architecture group has developed an impressive portfolio comprising bridges and urban infrastructure projects at many different scales and settings - including signature structures, movable bridges, pedestrian bridges, and corridor treatments. Little River Bridge Generator House, South Carollina Principal Architect for the design of a new generator building that will house an au)dliary Generator and a restroom adjacent to the swing truss bridge. Rails to Trails Pedestrian Bridge over NC -24, North Carolina Principal Architect for the design of a unique prefabricated 'weave" pedestrian bridge with a main (bowstring) span of 220' and approach (inverted bowstring) spans of 130' feet each. This bridge is part of a 5 -mile pedestrian/bikeway adjacent to a major US Marine Camp. This project includes a community outreach program aimed at winning the :support of the community and the NCDOT. Mantoloking River Bridge Control House, New Jersey Principal Architect for the design of a three level control house for a dual leaf Bascule Bridge located in southern New Jersey replacing an existing historical structure dating to 1930. Project includes preparation of presentation materials for coordination with State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO). SR-40811-4 Interchange, Florida Principal Architect for the architectural design of a complex interchange located in downtown Orlando. Tasks include the design of pre -cast concrete pylons, endspan enclosure walls, bridge piers and fascia elements. Pedestrian scaled treatments and parking are planned for below the structure. H American Parkway, Pennsylvania Principal Architect for the architectural design of corridor components and a new 700' signature span over Lehigh River in Allentown PA. Tasks include the development of a design theme that will be carried though the 2 -mile corridor creating a vital transportation link for the entire region. Prior to joining HNTB, Mr. Supcoff managed the New York office of a major architecture and planning firm, with a specialty in transportation architecture. His project experience includes the following: Macombs Dam Bridge Rehabilitation, New York, New York Project Architect for the design of a new control house and access stairways in sympathy with the historic bridge structure as well as new railings, protective fencing, curb safety barriers, roadway lighting, and historic statuary and fountain. Tomlinson Bridge Replacement, New Haven, Connecticut Project Architect for preliminary and final designs of a new lift bridge and control tower. Benjamin Franklin Bridge Toll Plaza Reconstruction, Camden, New Jersey Project Architect for the redesign of tollbooths and improved overall visibility and appearance of toll plaza and accommodation for new collection system, canopy, and redesign of interior. South Street Bridge Replacement, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Project Manager for the design of a replacement bridge for a 1923 steel and masonry structure, as well as urban design elements such as viewing balG:)nies and bikeways. Elizabeth River Viaduct and Corridor, Elizabeth, New Jersey Project Manager for the aesthetic enhancement for the 39 -span viaduct, 795 -ft approach ramps, corridor planning, and adjacent corridor design. San Francisco -Oakland Bay Bridge New East Bay Segment, California Senior Project Architect for the architectural design of cable stayed alternatives for the replacement of bridge main span and viaduct. Project included major public involvement campaign. Long Island Expressway Expansion/Reconstruction, Exits 36 -40, Long Island, New York Project Manager for bridge replacements and rehabilitations, retaining walls, noise barrier design and overall corridor aesthetics. Project included preparation of presentation graphics and materials for community outreach. Six Bridges in the Bronx, New York, New York Project Manager for the rehabilitation or replacement of six bridges, four of which are historic. Scope of work included aesthetic design for each bridge. Mainline- Schuylkill Bridge Rehabilitation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Project Architect for the rehabilitation of Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's Mainline- Schylkill Bridge and associated structures. 1 Barbara A. Simpson, ASLA Landscape Architect Education Bachelor of Landscape Architecture /1982 University of Washington Professional Registrations Landscape Architect/1992/Washington State — #568 Professional Memberships American Society of Landscape Architects Professional Experience Ms. Simpson has 20 years of experience in landscape architectural design, project management and construction management. She has provided professional design services for both private and public sectors, including the Port of Seattle, Los Angeles MTA, Sam Trans and the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, City of Federal Way, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, McChord Air Force Base, the City of Redmond, Sound Transit, WSDOT, King County Metro, Boeing and Microsoft. As a Project Manager, Ms. Simpson has administered public bid processes, construction contracts and managed project construction. Hood River Bridge Bicycle /Pedestrian Access Study, Hood River, OR Non - structural alternatives for bicycle and pedestrian use of the Hood River Toll Bridge were analyzed for the Port of Hood River for pursuit of future funding opportunities to create a vital link for non- motorized users across the Columbia River. The report included analysis of existing local and regional trail and bike lane facilities and level of use for relevance and connectivity to the bridge, demand and need analysis for bicycle and pedestrian access to the bridge, funding and partnering opportunities and description of alternatives including local transit van shuttle, ferry, and private van shuttle program. Sammamish River Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge, Redmond, WA Landscape Architect responsible for landscape and conceptual pedestrian bridge siting and pedestrian improvements for a new trail link in the City of Redmond. The bridge will be located at the confluence of three regional trails: the King County % Sammamish River paved and unpaved trails and the Puget Sound Energy /City of Redmond bicycle trail. The design will not only address the recreational needs of a variety of user groups and ownership's, but be highly cognizant of the visual impact and unique aesthetic opportunity of the bridge as a landmark within surrounding neighborhood. The site is environmentally sensitive requiring design for minimal impact on the surrounding wetlands and fish- bearing waterway. Lead Landscape Architect for concept design through final construction document for pedestrian bridge. Work includes preliminary siting and evaluation of siting criteria, bridge aesthetic concept development, pedestrian safety and ADA standards implementation, landscape design and pedestrian improvements including signage and wayfinding. Bridge construction is anticipated to begin in 2002. 118th Avenue SE Bikeway/Walkway and Railroad Bridge, City of Bellevue, Bellevue, WA Landscape Architect for the 118th Avenue SE Walkway/Bikeway project is a multipurpose trail underpass designed and constructed for the City of Bellevue Department of Public Works. The project entailed design of a portion of the Lake Washington Bicycle Trail system in Bellevue, WA. The project is unique in that it is a "missing link" in the system, which had remained unresolved i HNTB' through years of effort by the City of Bellevue and numerous consultants. HNTB was hired by the City of Bellevue to find the solution for the problem, which necessitated creating an undercrossing for an existing and active railroad track. The HNTB solution, to build a new railroad bridge and route the new trail underneath was accepted by the City and BNSF. Work included project management, concept design, final design, contract documents and cost estimating. Lawrence Station CTX South, Peninsula Corridor .Joint Powers Board, San Carlos, CA Civil team leader for design of Lawrence Station and concept development for Sunnyvale Station. Work includes design to expand each station for express track development. Ms. Simpson's involvement includes working with the client on program development, project management of civil engineering, station architecture design including stallion furnishings and platform shelters, landscaping, urban design, interdisciplinary coordination, permit coordination, and work as lead landscape architect for preliminary through final design and preparation of the final bid package. Responsible for design of $8.7 million in 2003 station construction. Overlake Transit Facility, Redmond, WA Lead Landscape Architect for the Overlake Transit Facility is a 9 acre, $6m transit transfer and multi- modal facility nearing completion for the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit). The work entailed extensive coordination with the City of Redmond, Sound Transit, WSDOT, King County Metro, and Microsoft Corporation and the selected project public artist. The project design includes a transit transfer roadway and platform, platform and site furnishings including design of custom canopies, a bicycle station and trail link to the WSDOT SR520 bicycle trail, a Microsoft shuttle transfer roadway and drop off facility, site landscaping and grading including wetponds, 250 Park and Ride parking spaces, two regional bus stops, and site planning for transit - oriented development including office space for the Microsoft shuttle dispatch services, a Community Policing substation, the Greater Redmond Transportation Management Association offices, vendors space and Operators rest area. Responsible for concept development, final design and contract documents for all landscape architecture and site canopy architecture as well as construction management for landscape and artwork improvements. Metro Red Line Mid -City Segment SEIS -SEIR, LANITA, Los Angeles, CA Work included site design and station area planning for two new rail station sites planned for the subway system extension. Responsible for site analysis, concept design and graphic documentation for the associated project SEIS /SEIR document. The work involved analysis of existing neighborhood context and participation in several public open houses, site layout for a multi -modal facility for the proposed 11 acre Venice /San Vicente station site and site layout for the proposed Olympic/Arlington site. Site design elements included a bus transfer facility, a 1000 car park and ride facility, site planning and coordination of two interconnected subway line stations and pedestrian - oriented urban design. The work also entailed parti6pation in track alignment and station location alternatives with site constraints for engineering analyses. Sounder Rail Phase I, Sound Transit, Seattle, WA Work included evaluation and identification of all storm, sewer, powerline, fiber optic, gas and fuel, signal, water and utility relocates along existing Burlington Northern and Union Pacific railroad Rights of Way for future track upgrades and improvements for Sounder Rail Commuter Rail alignment extending from Tacoma to Seattle Washington. HNTB Brian M. Elrod, ASLA Urban Designer /Context Sensitive Design Education Bachelor of Landscape Architecture /1986 Oklahoma State University Associate Degree in Drafting and Design /1982 Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College Professional Registrations Landscape Architecture /1995/Washington - #663 Landscape Architecture /1993 /California - #3919 Landscape Architecture /1997 /Nevada - #503 Landscape Architecture /1999 /Oregon - #444 Professional Memberships American Society of Landscape Architects Professional Experience Mr. Elrod is a project manager and department direcl:or for urban planning and landscape architectural projects. His responsibilities and experience include: comprehensive and neighborhood planning, urban design, transit and transportation oriented developments, community parks, neighborhood parks, athletic field renovations and playgrounds, golf courses, municipal, commercial, and residential projects. He provided conceptual design, construction documents, specifications, site observation and construction administration, public presentations, and project coordination. Other previous experience includes planned commercial developments, large -scale planned communities, condominiums, retail centers, habitat revegetation plans, design guideline publications, and master planning for urbanizing areas. He has coordinated with city, state, and other governmental agencies in processing plans and obtaining permits. Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Living War Memorial Park Relocation, Tacoma, WA Landscape Architect and Project Coordinator for relocation of an existing WWII Memorial Park. Duties included visual analysis, site assessment and selection, design criteria development, concept studies, final master plan and public involvement. Responsibilities also included coordination of all stakeholders including WSDOT, FHWA, City of TaG:)ma, Tacoma Parks and Ad Hoc Committee. Steel Bridge Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing, Portland, OR Landscape Architect for this ongoing multi- discipline! project to implement a low - level, mixed -use pathway across the Willamette River in downtown Portland. Project elements include modifications to the historic Steel Bridge, a two-deck lift bridge carrying railroad traffic on the lower deck and pedestrian, bicycle, auto, bus, and LRT traffic on the upper deck; a new mixed -use pathway on the East Bank of the Willamette River connecting the Steel Bridge crossing to the Oregon Convention Center Overlook and a future East Bank park; and a new pedestrian/bicycle bridge over existing mainline railroad tracks. HNTB Bureau of Land Management, Road Assessment, WA, OR, ID Project Coordinator for the Seattle office. Responsibilities included staffing, scheduling and daily coordination for staff to complete road assessments for the Bureau of Land Management-Western Region. Work included visual analysis of road conditions and identification of future improvements. SR520 Roadside Restoration, Washington State Department of Transportation, WA Project Manager and lead Landscape Architect for this 5.5 -mile stretch of SR520 Roadside Restoration project in Bellevue and Redmond, Washington. Responsibilities included contracting, sub - consultant management, design, presentations and daily coordination efforts with the client, cities and stakeholders. Work included development of the highway's right-of-way landscape conceptual plans, construction plans and specifications. Albeni Falls ADA Modernization and Renovations, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Priest River, ID Project Landscape Architect for 5 different campsites and recreation areas. Each campground an recreation area presented unique challenges in providing ADA upgrades and improvements due to topography, existing vegetation and character. The work included master plan design and construction document preparation for each site, which included amenity upgrades to beaches, boat ramps, playgrounds, campsites, restrooms, trails and staff facilities. Responsibilities included conceptual design, project coordination, construction drawings and specifications. Rainier Beach Neighborhood Plan, Seattle, WA Retained by the Rainier Beach Neighborhood 2014 Committee as the Landscape Architect responsible for preparing the Phase I portion of the neighborhood plan. HNTB's Seattle Planning Department is responsible for reviewing neighborhood survey results, tabulating the results and preparing the community for the Visioning Event, developing the scope of work for the Phase 2 portion of the neighborhood plan, and preparing both a physical and social needs inventory of the neighborhood. The neighborhood is along the alignment of Seattle Regional Transit Authority's new light rail alignment, with key interface issues involved in the neighborhood analysis. Pasadena Blue Line ( Marmion Way) Light Rail Transit Project, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA Project Landscape Architect providing urban design and public involvement support for the Marmion Way Corridor of the 13.7 -mile Pasadena Blue Line 1project. Community concerns about the impacts of the new line on private properties were resolved by changing the system design from semi - exclusive (fenced right -of -way) to full street running. Urban design measures such as separation of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular ways along the narrow corridor are also being explored to promote user safety. Ongoing work involves implementation of further urban design measures for the corridor, including right -of -way design, streetscape design, station area urban design, and private property interface. Hilton Hotel - Seattle Airport, Seatttle, WA Prime Architect for the design of a major expansion and renovation of the Hilton Seattle Airport , located in the City of SeaTac, Washington. The project consists of design and engineering services through construction completion. The current 178 room facility will be expanded to 400 rooms with $14.7 million in new construction, $8.9 million in renovation and $3.2 million in site improvements including a new convention center. The project site design concept was developed to create an inviting and exciting entrance experience for the guest. Landscaped courtyards with extensive use of plant materials and outdoor seating are proposed. A lighted fountain entry is planned for creating a new image and contribution to the urban streetsc:ape. 1-1NTB Min Maung, PE Electrical Design Engineer Education BS /1968/Electrical Engineering/Rangoon Institute of Technology Professional Registrations Electrical Engineer /1981/Washington - #19928 Electrical Engineer /1986 /Califomia - #E012210 Electrical Engineer /1993/ldaho - #7251 Professional Background Entered the profession in 1968, joined HNTB in 19713 Professional Experience Mr. Maung is an electrical design engineer. He has designed electrical systems for numerous roadway and transportation projects (both surface and underground); in addition to commercial, institutional, industrial, aviation, military, health care, and recreational facilities. Steel Bridge, Portland, OR Lighting Engineer for pedestrian bridge added to eAsting railroad bridge. Also designed lighting for the parks at both ends of bridge. Caltrain Lawrence Station, Sunnyvale, CA Project engineer for train station lighting and power and relocation of overhead and underground electrical utilities. 1 -15 Lighting, Salt Lake City, UT Provided lighting calculations for various lighting configurations including median, edge, high -mast and flood lighting for 16 miles of 6 -7 lane freeway through downtown Salt lake City. Downtown Seattle Transit Project, METRO, WA Design engineer for one station of 1.3 -mile underground transit system consisting of three subsurface and two surface level passenger stations in interconnecting twin bored tunnels. Station and tunnels design for electric buses with provisions, for light rail service by the year 2000. Evergreen Point Bridge SR520 Lighting Upgrades, WA Electrical engineer for replacement of lighting on SR'.520 from 1 -5 10th Street undercrossing to MP 3.07 west of the floating bridges opening. Project consists of replacement of all lighting systems, conduit and service distribution equipment. Highway 83 Lighting, Missoula, MT Lighting Engineer for 2,300 -meter section along State Highway 83. The design met MDOT standards. Port of Longview Alternate Rail Corridor and Fibre Way Grade Separation, Longview, WA Lighting Engineer for 1,800 -foot roadway lighting. Design met City of Longview and WSDOT standards. IHIMYB Steamboat and Ebey Slough Bridges, Everett, WA, Electrical engineer for design of electrical power and control systems as part of renovation of these two swing bridges. Work includes new PLCs, variable speed drives, limit switches and sensors, lighting, and a relocated control house. Ford Island Bridge, Honolulu, HI Preliminary design documents for floating movable bridge including 12.5KV power distribution and programmable logic controls. Systems include step down 480Volt substations, trolley- supported power and control cables for moveable section, and traffic safety barriers and gates. Design also included roadway and navigation lighting. Fuller Warren Bridge, Tampa, FL Electrical designer for roadway, navigation, and accent lighting for a 6,500 -foot fixed bridge above St. John's River. 1 -275, Tampa, FL Lighting retrofit for ten different underpasses including photoelectric controls EpcotBuena Vista Interchange, Orlando, FL Conventional highway lighting for multi-lane interchange. Southern Connector, Orlando, FL Cobra head and shoebox lighting systems for 2 miles of freeway. 1 -90 Mt. Baker Tunnel, Seattle, WA Chief inspector for supervision of construction of 1 -90 tunnel electrical systems. Devil's Slide Tunnel Study, Pacifica, CA Evaluation of lighting designs and construction costs; for 4500 tunnel alternatives on US Hwy 101. Twin tube and single tube alternatives with and without bicycle paths were considered. HNTB Semyon Treyger, PE, SE Technical Bridge Expert Education MS /1973 /Structural Engineering/Moscow Structures Institute Active Registration 1993 /Civil Engineer /CA #C050515 Expires: June, 30, 2005 1993 /Structural Engineer /CA #003756 Expires: June 30, 2005 Professional Experience Mr. Treyger has over 30 years of experience in structural engineering. As director of bridge and tunnel engineering, he has designed major bridges and tunnels, several of which have been recognized with awards for their excellence of design and is considered one of HNTB's foremost experts in the seismic design and retrofit of structures. He has provided both design services and quality control review for HNTB projects throughout the United States and abroad. Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement, Long Beach, CA Bridge Design manager for the design of signature span cable- stayed bridge with a mile long approach spans for Port of Long Beach and Caltrans as clients. POLB and Caltrans envision this bridge as the "Golden Gate of the South" as South Califomia does not have a prominent signature span bridge at this time. Main span features a 2000 -ft long bridge with 200-ft vertical clearance. Bridge type considered are concrete -steel composite? and concrete segmental. Approach spans are considered of three types: concrete bulb tee, steel 1- girder and concrete segmental box. Project is currently under conceptual design stage. Estimated construction cost is $ 780,000,000. SR16/Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridges, Tacoma, WA Deputy Bridge Design Manager for the design of the New Tacoma Narrows Parallel Crossing and upgrade of the Existing Tacoma Narrows Bridge. The parallel crossing features a 5,400 -foot long suspension bridge with a 2,800 -foot main span. The superstructure consists of a composite construction orthotropic deck supported by floorbearns at 20-ft on center and a stiffening truss supported by 40 -ft on center hangers and two 21 -inch diameter main cables with 78 -foot on center cables. The new bridge is designed for a future second deck installation per WSDOT request. Bridge is located in the highly seismic area and complete nom- linear time history seismic analysis was performed on HNTB in -house T187 program and ADINA finite element program. Upgrade to the existing bridge includes seismic retrofit and deck modifications. This project is a D/B job and currently in the final design stage. Bid construction cost is $ 680,000,000. Yerba Buena Tunnel, San Francisco, CA Analytical team leader for a first -ever analysis and retrofit rock tunnel structure. Cutting -edge technology in non - linear analysis application was applied to solve soil - structure interaction problems for world's largest rock tunnel. The finite element ADINA program was used to analyze two- dimensional models of the tunnel cross - section, three - dimensional global model of the entire tunnel and a detailed three - dimensional model of the typical portal. The primary task was to study deformations imposed on the tunnel liner as a consequence of seismic wave propagation through the rock surrounding the liner. Global longitudinal models captured changes in longitudinal strain H B while two- dimensional transverse cross s ande1�ck assessments were also performed. racking and analysis ovaling of the liner. Wave propagation y Carquinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Contra Costa/Solano County, CA. Lead design engineer for the seismic retrofit of the 1927 Carquinez Bridge and approach structures. Listed on the National Register of Historic Structures, this long span steel cantilevered through truss has main spans of 1,100 ft and a total bridge length of 3,350 feet. Devil's Slide Tunnel, San Mateo County, CA Task leader for structural analysis and design for this bored rock tunnel t 30 be constructed -foot wide twin tunnel will Route 1 just south of Pacifica in San Mateo County. The new, two -lane, measure 4,200 feet long each bore. Also serving as task leader for the tunnel seismic analysis and design work. San Francisco -Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) West Span Bicycle /Pedestrian /Maintenance Path Planning and Feasibility Study, San Francisco CA Design engineer for the preparation of a bicycle /pede :strian /maintenance path planning and feasibility report for the west spans of the SFOBB. The feasibility study addressed new at -grade facilities on YBI and within San Francisco; new elevated pathway structures on YBI; new elevated and undercrossing structures within San Francisco; new pathway structures on the north and south sides of the SFOBB; structural impacts on the existing bridge due to dead, live, and seismic loads, and wind aerodynamic conditions; right-of-way; utility relocation; agency permitting; long -term maintenance; and user and functional needs. BART SFO Extension, San Francisco, CA Design engineer for design and construction for the subway SFO extension to San Francisco Airport. subway tunnel. The underground tunnel is being The extension includes eight miles of underground constructed by cut - and -cover method, and consists of one to three cell sections 16 feet by 60 feet wide and 16 feet high. Tunnel was analyzed for soil, water pressure, seismic and live loads consisting of Cooper E80 and AASHTO loads. Besides the underground subway and aerial bridge structures, the project also includes structural and civil design elements, trackwork design, systems design, electrical design and mechanical design. NNTB Simon Kim, PE Project Manager 11 Education MS /1991 /Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA BS /1988 /Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA Professional Registrations PE/Civil Engineering/California # C52451 Professional Society Membership Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors of California, Membership Chair of the Bay Bridge Chapter Structural Engineering Association of Northern California, Member ASCE Standard Committee on Testing of Base Isolation Systems, Member Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Member Professional Experience Mr. Kim has over 11 years of structural engineering design and engineering management. Mr. Kim is currently responsible for performance of project management and leading the structural analysis and design, development of construction details, production of contract documents, and quality control. His responsibilities have covered highway, rail, and light rail bridge design: plan preparation, specification writing, and estimating. Mr. Kim's expertise has grown to include extensive bridge retrofit work, bridge widening and new bridge design, much of which has been through Caltrans projects. He is familiar with the Agency's organization and standards. CALTRANS Bay Bridge Bikeway Feasibility Study, Oakland, CA Senior Project Engineer — Responsible for providing the Advanced Planning Study of Yerba Buena Island (YBI) approach structures, which includes a signature double steel arch bridge structure which crosses over the West Portal. The selected YBI Viaduct #1 (west side north viaduct) alternative consists of a 1260 feet long bridge including 3 concrete frames with 14 intermediate single - column bents, and 1 steel arch west portal crossing. The selected YBI Viaduct #2 (west side south viaduct) alternative consists of a 185 feet long bridge including 1 frame with 2 intermediate single- column bents. The design access for YBI is based on the shortest and workable pathways connecting the new East Span Bikeway with the proposed West Span Bikeway. YBI constraints are defined by a West span bikeway ending at the west anchorage and a new East span bikeway ending with an off - ramp structure. The selected design enhances the shortest path around the island while minimizing vertical climbs and road crossings for safety and comfort. Cesar Chavez Bikeway Overcrossing, San Francisco, CA Deputy Project Manager - Managed the design of a 300 -foot long voided slab prestressted cast-in-place bridge. Funded by STIP, constructing adjacent to state highway off -ramps within the State right -of -way, the project presented numerous non - standard design items, extremely limited construction access, and tight site geometric constraints. Provided coordination with CCSF, Caltrans and design consultants. CALTRANS, the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge & San Mateo Hayward Bridge Seismic Vulnerability Study Senior Project Engineer - Responsible for comprehensive seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges. Conducted dynamic analyses of the entire bridge, including nonlinear and multisupport excitation effects. Structural components examined include: pile foundations, reinforced concrete pier shafts, reinforced concrete columns, steel towers, and steel trussing superstructures. HNTB San Francisco International Airport and BART Station, San Francisco, CA Senior Project Engineer - Managed the analysis work and was responsible for implementation of the project specific, innovative seismic, design criteria, prepared by the Transit Guideway Consultants, for structural design of the San Francisco International Airl)orfs Aerial Rapid Transit (ART) and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station. Managed subconsultants, performed extensive detailed nonlinear static and dynamic analyses, coordinated the design team's effort in order to ensure its compliance with criteria, and liaised with the criteria development committee. PCJPB - Caltrain Express PS&E, San Carlos, CA Project Manager — Responsible for providing management on the general engineering consultant team for the Caltrain Express Project, representing the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board. The project includes capital and maintenance improvements on the 80 -mile rail line from San Francisco to Gilroy, California. Mr. Kim currently manages both civil and structural design efforts for bridge widening at the Bowers Avenue Underpass and the San Tomas Aquinas Creek Underpass, as well as minor structures for crash wall protection. His duties include coordination with PCJPB, Santa Clara Valley Water District, local municipalities, utility companies and permitting agencies. PCJPB — Caltrain Express Feasibility Study, San Catrios, CA Project Manager — Responsible for providing management on the general engineering consultant team for the Caltrain Express Feasibility Project, representing the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board. Route E 2371N 880 Connector Separation, City of Milpitas, CA Senior project engineer responsible for providing the design and construction services for a 52 -foot wide, 1,925 -foot long, 10 -span fly -over bridge in Milpitas. Mr. Kim also managed contract change orders including a drastic modification of a large footing, supported by approximately 70 precast piles, in order to avoid conflict with the existing fiber optic cable bank. Buchanan Street Overhead, City of Albany, CA Senior Project Engineer - Responsible for the design modifications of the existing structure. The project included adding a new ramp, eliminating an existing ramp, providing median in -fill for left turn lanes, and deck re- grading. Being directly adjacent to state highway off - ramps, the site presented numerous design challenges, including the presence of soft Bay Mud of variable depths, near source effects, tight geometric constraints, and existing utility conflicts. The project also included the evaluation of a prior seismic retrofit design of the existing bridge. Mr. Kim was responsible for the coordination between the City of Albany, Caltrans, and the design consultants. Tunnel Avenue Overhead, City of Brisbane, CA Deputy Project Manager - Managed the design of a 1 COO -foot long HBRR bridge replacement. The site presented numerous design challenges, including liquefaction, the presence of the deep soft Bay Mud, near source effects, tight geometric constraints, and e)dsting utility conflicts. Provided coordination with City of Brisbane, PCJPB, Caltrans, and utility companies. Arch Road/ State Route 99 Interchange, San Jose, CA Senior Project Engineer - Responsible for the Advanced Planning Study for the four bridge structures that comprise the urban interchange. Challenging design features include the need to accommodate heavy track traffic, the ability to maintain traffic at all times during construction, and the need for a unique staging plan incorporating a temporary bridge, reinforced soil walls and cross traffic over a partially complete span of the bridge. HNTB Theodore P. Zoli, PE Bridge Designer Education B.S., Civil Engineering, 1988, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ M.S., Civil Engineering, 1989, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Adjunct Professor of Civil Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey Project Engineering Panel, NCHRP 12 -49, Comprehensive Specifications for the Seismic Design of Bridges Registration P.E.: New York, 1993 Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE Subcommittee on the Seismic Performance of Bridges International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering Related Publications 1995 Zoli, T. & McCabe, R. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of a Two Level Portion of the Richmond Expressway ", Proceedings, National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways, San Diego, CA., December 10-13,1995 1996 Zoli, T. 'The New Jersey Department of Transportation Seismic Prioritization Program ", Proceedings, ASCE Conference Seismic Assessment of Regional Lifelines, Newark, NJ, March 19-20,1996 1998 Zoli, T & Gamble, S., "Dynamic Characteristics of the Mid - Hudson Suspension Bridge, Wind Behavior and the Use of Ambient/Forced Vibration Field Surveys", ASCE Met Section, Spring Seminar, 1998. Professional Experience Mr. Zoli joined HNTB in 1990, and serves as the Director of Long Span Bridge Design in the New York office. He is a nationally recognized expert in seismic analysis, design, and retrofit of bridges. He has an extensive knowledge of all aspects of seismic design, including prioritization, vulnerability assessment, conceptual & detailed retrofit design, seismic isolation, and the preparation of construction plans and specifications. He has concentrated his efforts on seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofit of bridges in the Northeast United States. Mr. Zoli currently is serving on the Project Engineering Panel charged with developing the next generation of AASHTO bridge seismic design guidelines. Rome Pedestrian Bridge, Rome, Georgia Project Engineer and Lead Designer in charge of the conceptual and final design of this signature suspension bridge over the Oostanaula River with a main span of 350 ft. The pedestrian bridge is designed in accordance with the new AASHTO Guide Specifications for Pedestrian Bridges. The suspension bridge utilizes a steel composite deck, inclined suspenders and steel towers above the 100 year flood elevation. Charles River Bridge, Boston, MA Project Engineer in charge of the final design of the unusual cable- stayed bridge project. Site - specific response spectral analyses were conducted for both operating level and maximum credible events. Soil- structure interaction analyses were performed to assess foundation strength 1 requirements in the presence of a liquefaction induced lateral spread event. All major load carving elements were designed to remain elastic during the maximum credible event. Cape Girardeau Bridge, Illinois Provided seismic analysis and design of the 1150 -ft main span concrete cable stayed bridge. Due to the structure's proximity to the New Madrid Fault, seismic considerations are essential to the design of this structure. Site - specific time history analysis that incorporated multi- support excitation was conducted. Soil liquefaction was a major design issue, whereby forces from sloughing and changes in foundation stiffness were incorporated in the seismic analysis and design. The use of isolation systems were also evaluated. (1994 -1995) Sixth Street Bridge, Milwaukee, WI Project Manager and lead engineer for this design build project which consists of twin 195 ft main span concrete cable- stayed bridges with inclined towers and twin double leaf bascules' bridges with spans of 134 feet. This is the first bi- directionally post- tensioned flat slab cable stayed bridge in the United States. Complete final design and construction of these four complex structures will be completed within a 24 month schedule. Stonecutters Bridge Design Competition, Hong Kong, China Project Engineer and Lead Designer in charge of the conceptual design of this unusual cable stayed bridge with a main span of 1000m. Developed the concept which was selected as a finalist for this prestigious international design competition. The unusual three dimensional cable arrangement optimized wind performance of the bridge, while eliminating the problem of cable vibrations. The main span utilized a steel orthotropic box girder. Ohio River Bridge at Blennerhasset Island, Parkersburg, West Virginia Project Engineer and Lead Designer in charge of the conceptual and final design of this signature suspension bridge over the Ohio River and Blennertiasset Island with a main span of approximately 1500 ft. Due to the unusually long back span (900 ft) spanning the Ohio side channel, an unusual cable arrangement and longitudinally rigid towers are required. Currently, inclined suspender options, orthotropic and composite deck alternatives,, as well as varying tower configurations are under evaluation. Worli Bandra Sea Link Bridge, Mumbai, India Project Engineer and Lead Designer in charge of the preliminary and final design of twin 250m main span concrete cable- stayed bridge over the Mahim Bay. The bridge consists of an unusual inverted Y shaped single tower supporting twin precast segmental concrete boxes with 4 planes of cables. Sidney Lanier Bridge, Georgia Project Engineer in charge of analysis and final design of the 1250 ft main span steel composite cable- stayed bridge over the Brunswick River. Due to the torsional flexibility of the superstructure cross section and the potential for hurricane level winds at the site, A -frame towers were required to improve flutter and vortex excitation. Delaware Memorial Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Delaware Project Manager in charge of the dynamic analysis and conceptual retrofit design for the twin suspension bridges and over three miles of approaches. This project includes nonlinear dynamic analysis for the suspended spans as well as site - specific seismological and site response evaluations. Retrofit strategies included bearing replacement with isolation bearings. Lateral strength (Push -over) analyses were conducted for critical substructure units to determine optimal retrofit requirements. HNTB Chip P. Mallare Jr., PE Structural Engineer Education MS /1990 /Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University BS /1987 /Civil Engineering, Marquette University Professional Registrations 1993 /Civil Engineering: California No. C050659 Professional Background Entered the profession in 1991; joined HNTB in 1991 Professional Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers Society of American Military Engineers Publications "Displacement Ductility Analysis of the Petaluma River Bridge," Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Structural Engineers Association of California Convention, Scottsdale, Arizona, September 29 - October 2, pp. 143 -150. "Bridge Seismic Retrofitting ", Proceedings of the 1993 Surface Transportation Workshop, October 1 - October 3, Houston, Texas. "Stress- Sprain Behavior of Spirally Confined Concrete," Master of Science Thesis, submitted to North Carolina State University Graduate School, Raleigh, NC, 1990. "Load Resistance Factor Design of Beams- to-Column Flange Connections for Restrained Members — Design Aids," Structural Engineering Practice, vol. 4, no. 1 -2, 1987, pp 19 -66. Professional Experience Mr. Mallare has over 12 years of experience in structural and highway engineering design, engineering management and program management. His experience also includes both bridge construction assistance and construction inspection. Mr. Mallare's previous projects include all aspects of highway and bridge design, such as plan preparation, specification writing and estimating. His background includes extensive bridge retrofit work, as well as new bridge design. Mr. Mallare has also performed construction inspection work on bridge retrofit projects for Caltrans and was responsible for Task Orders and all. on -call construction engineering during HNTB's Seismic Bridge Retrofit Contract for Caltrans. Measure A/B Highway Program, Santa Clara County, CA Design Coordinator responsible for overseeing all aspects of the Route 85/101 (S) Interchange Project, the Route 85/87 Interchange Project, and the Route 152 Safety Improvement Project, from the environmental phase through final PS&E and construction. He is also directly responsible for the oversight of all structures work for the entire Highway Program. Mr. Mallare's role also includes coordination between the various design disciplines such as environmental, civil, electrical, structural, and architectural firms, coordination between the designers and the reviewing agencies such as Caltrans, Santa Clara County Water District, The City of San Jose, other local agencies and environmental review agencies. HNTB is part of a joint venture team with Hatch Mott McDonald to perform Program Management for the Santa Clara County Measure A/B Highway Program. This ambitions $600 million Highway Program includes ten main projects with improvements on nearly every major freeway within Santa Clara County. The Program Management team performs oversight on ten prime consultants and over 40 subc:onsultants. Del Amo Boulevard Overcrossing, Carson, CA Mr. Mallare was the project engineer for this 1,000 -foot long CIP P/S box girder bridge. Key issues which influenced the design included substantial variations in substructure heights, changes in soil conditions, and large spectral accelerations. Unique tapered pier walls were designed for the bents located in the Dominguez Channel to limit scour and to avoid conflicts with utilities which could not be economically relocated. Limits on construction time within the Dominguez Channel also impacted the design of the structure. BART SFO Extension, San Mateo County, CA Deputy Chief Structural Engineer responsible for design and design oversight of the subway box sections and the aerial structures. The seismic design of the aerial structures included standard Caltrans practices as well as complex non - linear time history evaluations. Mr. Mallare's role also included coordination with other design disciplines such as civil, architecture, environmental, and systems design. He also provided design oversight for the station, ventilation, and other miscellaneous structures. The BART SFO Extension Project includes 8 miles of underground subway and over one mile of aerial bridge structure:; that will serve the San Francisco Airport 1-880 Replacement, Oakland, CA Design engineer for design and construction of three; Caltrans viaducts connecting the Oakland /San Francisco Bay Bridge to 1 -880. PS&E documents were prepared for a three -lane north connector, a two-lane south connector and a future HOV expansion. Mr. Mallare was responsible for initial sizing and field splice locations of the welded steel 1- girders for both the north and south connectors to minimize construction and material costs. He was also determined the column and footing placement in a congested railroad yard to minimize track relocation and to provide optimal span arrangements. Carquinez Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Contra Costa/Solano County, CA Mr. Mallare served as lead analysis engineer for the West Approach structure. He was also the lead engineer for analysis and design of the "BA Line Off -Ramp structure, a 1,135 foot long deck truss bridge with complex geometry. As lead engineer, Mr. Mallare was responsible for all PS&E efforts, supervising a design group of 10 engineers and CARD technicians. HNTB was a key member of the team contracted by Caltrans to provide performance! acceptance criteria, PS&E packages and design support during construction. Young Chong Suspension Bridge, Seoul Korea Lead Design Engineer responsible for investigating various cable spinning techniques and suspension bridge construction procedures in order to reduce the overall construction time and costs associated with the Young Chong Suspension Bridge in Seoul Korea. The 1,800 -foot long main span suspension bridge consisted of two decks, an upper deck to carry roadway traffic and a lower deck for rail traffic. A number of options were developed, one of which included a unique cable erection technique specifically tailored to this particular structure which would maximize the efficiency of existing Korean technology and equipment. HNTB conducted a study to provide the cable engineering services for the proposed suspension bridge linking the new Seoul Airport on Young Chong Island to the City of Inchon, Korea. Firm Description Fehr & Peers specializes in providing transportation planning and traffic engineering services to public and private sector clients. We emphasize the development of creative, cost - effective and result- oriented solutions to planning and design problems associated with all modes of transportation. With a current staff of over 100 engineers, planners and support personnel, our expertise includes the analysis, planning and design for transportation projects in the following major disciplines: • Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning • New Urbanism • Traffic Calming Traffic Operations Transportation Design Transportation Planning The firm's professional staff has developed a considerable reputation in the transportation planning and traffic engineering field. Our commitment to quality and personal service is evidenced by the large number of repeat clients. We have planned and evaluated many award - winning transportation projects, which is testimony to the creative talent and problem solving ability of our staff. We are also leading the nation with new techniques in evaluating travel demand and land use interactions as well as applying microstation models. fp' FEHR &I PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Bikeway and Pedestrian Planning Most cities and towns throughout the country already have bike lanes, pathways, and pedestrian areas full of joggers, walkers, cyclists, school children, senior citizens, and families. When properly planned and built, they typically become popular community amenities — helping to meet recreation and transportation needs of local citizens. Fehr & Peers Associates believes that every community should provide an integrated non - motorized transportation system. We specialize in state -of -the -art planning studies and designs which have proven successful over time in a variety of urban, suburban, and rural settings. We understand that each community is different, with unique needs, geography, cost constraints, and history. Our projects throughout the western United States are successful because we listen to our clients' needs, spend time in the field, meet with staff and the public, and utilize our extensive resource library, computerized mapping, and design capabilities. `t Our specific bikeway and pedestrian services include: • Bikeway and Trail Master Plans • Pedestrian Facility Plans • Corridor Studies • Safety, Education, and Marketing Plans • Design and Engineering • Mapping and Graphics Our key strengths are specialized expertise, proven abilities to get projects built and funded, use of the latest standards and graphictmapping software including AutoCAD, GIS, and Microstation and a balance of practical and innovative engineering experience. fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS IKRISTIANN CHOY Senior Transportation Engineer /Planner EXPERIENCE Transportation Planning /Impact Analysis Served as Project Engineer on numerous stand -alone Transportation Impact Analysis and Environmental Impact Reports. Responsibilities included scope of work preparation, analysis of existing conditions, project trip generation and distribution, identification of significant impacts on all modes of transportation, and development of mitigation measures. Some of these projects include: • Campbell General Plan • Campbell Housing Element • Mountain View Housing Element • Renaissance Hotel in Milpitas • Gilroy Sports Park • Engineering Building at University of California Santa Cruz • Bayer. Corporation Development Agreement • Alta Bates Medical Center EIR Traffic En-'neering Served as Project Engineer with responsibilities including intersection operation, warrant analyses and safety analyses. Studies include: • Corral Hollow Road and Muirfield Development Warrant Analysis, Tracy, CA • Quarry Road Parking Lot Warrant Analysis, Palo Alto, CA • Ignacio Boulevard Interchange, Novato, CA Traffic Signal Desi Design engineer for preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS &E) for new traffic signals or modifications of existing traffic signals. PS &E packages prepared according to both Caltrans and local agency requirements. Projects include: • Hale Avenue/Tilton Avenue, Morgan Hill, CA (1 new) • Story Road/Lyndale Drive, San Jose, CA (1 new) • Silver Creek Valley Road/Fontanoso Way, San 'lose, CA (2 modifications) • Hollis Street/64 h Street, Emeryville, CA (2 new) • Watergate Towers, Emeryville, CA (1 new, 1 modification) 03/02 f? FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS EDUCATION • Master of Science in Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1993 • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, 1992 AFFILIATION • Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) CERTIFICATION • Licensed Professional Civil Engineer, State of California (64730) • Licensed Professional Traffic Engineer, State of California (2141) Kristiann Choy Page 2 • State Route 4 /State Route 49, Angels Camp, CA (I new) • Shellmound Street, Emeryville, CA (2 new) Traffic Operations Conducted traffic operations analyses using Synchro and CORSIM to evaluate operations of alternatives for the San Tomas Expressway and Monroe Street grade separation project and to evaluate operations of Sycamore Valley Road at Interstate 680. Signal Timing and Coordination Served as Project Engineer in developing and updating coordinated signal timing plans using PASSER H -90, PASSER IV -96, TRANSYT -7F and SYNCHRO. Responsibilities included model development, alternatives evaluations, preparing Bitrans 233 timing sheets and evaluated travel time studies. Some of these projects include: • Vallejo City -wide Project (20 subsystems) • Hillsdale Boulevard, Edgewater Boulevard and :Foster City Boulevard (12 intersections) • Kirker Pass Road/Ygnacio Valley Road (9 intersections) and Willow Pass /Clayton Road (9 intersections) • Blackhawk/Crow Canyon Road (5 intersections) • Washington/Lewelling (4 intersections) • El Camino Real (20 intersections) 03/02 f� FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS JASON D. PACK Transportation Engineer EXPERIENCE Pedestrian and Bicycle Studies City of Sunnyvale Recommended Bicycle Capital Improvement Program. This was a long -range planning tool developed for City Staff to plan the addition of bicycle facilities to arterial roadways throughout the city. City of San Jose Commuter Bicycle Corridor Study. This study evaluated possible bicycle trail /path projects along Guadalupe River, Coyote Creek, and Los Gatos Creek to support bicycle use as a commute mode into downtown and the northern industrial areas of San Jose. Emeline Campus Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation Improvement Study (Santa Cruz). This study included identification of existing pedestrian and vehicular on -site deficiencies and development of conceptual plan.3 to improve on -site circulation. Traffic Calming Studies Developed neighborhood traffic calming plan for the Vendome neighborhood (San Jose) as part of the College Park development project. Developed Saratoga neighborhoods traffic calming; plan. Developed traffic calming device to minimize neighborhood traffic impacts by the Willow Glen Longs Drugs Store development project. Transportation Planning Completed planning studies to recommend improvements to adequately serve future travel demand. • Saratoga Circulation and Scenic Highway Element Update. • Sandy City (Utah) Downtown Illustrative Genend Plan. • I- 25 /Bellview (Denver) Area Master Plan. • City of Burlingame Analyzer Update. Traffic Engineering and Parking Studies Performed site traffic analyses as stand -alone studies and for inclusion in environmental documents. Tasks also included development of conceptual intersection and parking lot layout designs, evaluation of parking demand, and use of Highway Capacity Manual and other traffic operations methodologies. 03/02 f? FEHR &_ PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis, 1999 CERTIFICATION • Engineer -In- Training, State of California COMPUTER SKILLS • TRAFFIX • Synchro • Corsim • aaSIDRA • Spreadsheet programs • Access databases • AutoCAD /AutoTurn Jason D. Pack Page 2 • Saratoga Union School District Studies. • Los Altos School District Studies. • Freemont Union High - School District Circulation Study. • Saratoga and San Jose Public Libraries Traffic /Parking Studies. • NASA Research Park /Moffett Field Re-Use EIS. • Cupertino City Center Mixed Use Traffic /Parkin); Study. • Marina Shores Development EIR (Redwood City) • Abbott Labs Development EIR (Redwood City) • Catholic Diocese High School EIR (Morgan Hill) • College Park Development Traffic /Parking Study (San Jose). • Vallco Mall EIR (Cupertino). • Hollister Industrial Park EIR. Travel /Trip Generation Surveys Prepared and performed various surveys to obtain data for inclusion in travel demand studies, transportation corridor analyses, and traffic impact analyses. • Trip Generation Survey for High Tech Office Uses in Milpitas. • East Palo Alto License Plate Survey. • Abbott Labs Trip Generation Survey (Redwood City, Morgan Hill, and Santa Clara). TransRortation Demand Management Studies Developed transportation demand management (TDM) programs that were used to minimize project - generated traffic impacts and promote alternative modes of transportation. • 350 -360 Convention Way TDM Program (Redwood City). • Redwood City Technology Center TDM Program. Corridor Studies Prepared analyses to evaluate adequacy of signal timings, turn- pocket storage lengths, and intersection operations. Studies also included development of conceptual roadway striping plans. • Mission College Boulevard (Santa Clara). • Madrone Parkway Extension (Morgan Hill). 3/02 f? FEHR &_ PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS GENERAL INFORMATION NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESSES: Santa Clara Kier & Wright Civil Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. 3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 Santa Clara, California 95054 Telephone: 408- 727 -6665 Fax: 408 - 727 -5641 YEAR FIRM ESTABLISHED: 1972 FIRM'S PRINCIPAL FIELDS OF EXPERTISE: Commercial & Office Buildings Cadence Design Systems Cambrian Business Park River Corporate Center IBM San Thomas Corporate Center Marriott Hotel B.A.R.T. Parking Structure Shoreline Technology Park Great America Technology Center Campuses Cisco Systems Corporate Campus Cisco Systems — Phases 1 -5 Adobe Systems — Phases 1 &2 Sun Microsystems Campuses Applied Materials Stewart Campus Altera Campus Network Appliance Corporate Campus McCarthy Ranch Novell - San Jose Campus Pleasanton Kier & Wright Civil Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. 1233 Quarry Lane, Suite 145 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Telephone: 925- 249 -6555 Fax: 925- 249 -6563 TYPE OF ORGINAZATION: California Corporation Retail Fashion Fair Mall Newpark Mall Sun Valley Mall Expansion Serramonte Acura/Cadillac Orchard Farm Shopping Center Mercado Shopping Center Reconstruction. Expansion & Widening San Francisco International Airport San Jose International Airport De Anza Boulevard Widening & Overcrossing Pier 39 Breakwater Pier 39 Marina Martinez Downtown Beautification Routes 85 & 237 Multi Residence Kensington Place Apartments Town Center Homes Winfield Affordable Housing PRINCIPALS: Anthony McCants, L.S., President Ted L. Wilson, L.S., Vice - President Eugene R. Golobic, P.E., Vice - President Barry Schmitt, P.E., Vice - President David Readler, P.E., Vice- President PROJECT MANAGERS: Richard Tso, P.E. Michael R. Lesar, P.E. Tony Rubio, L.S. Jim R. Vigil, L.S. Glen Aoyama c:\Documents and Settings \Jcarlough.KIERWRJGH7%Local Settings \Ten-porary Internet Fi1es \0LK7 \General Information.doc PROFILE OF FIRM Kier & Wright Civil Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. has provided comprehensive civil engineering and land surveying services to the public and private sector since 1972. Services offered include street and highway design, municipal consultation, utility engineering, grading and drainage plans, A.L.T.A. surveys, mapping, boundary surveys, topographic surveys, construction staking, land planning, and other related professional services. Kier & Wright has offices located in the cities of Santa Clara and Pleasanton. Kier & Wright Civil Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. is a California corporation currently staffed by 85 employees: 7 registered civil engineers, 5 civil engineers, 7 professional licensed land surveyors, 11 office surveyors /field crew support staff, 35 union field surveying personnel, 12 engineering technical/CAD drafters and 8 administrative /clerical. The Santa Clara Office has a staff of 44 and the Pleasanton office has a staff of 41. Since 1978 the firm has increased in size almost fivefold. Kier & Wright is committed to providing efficient, cost effective services to our clients. We at Kier & Wright emphasis a team approach method on every project that we work on and include our client as part of our team. Growth of the firm has been due entirely to referrals, repeat business, and the underlying philosophy of the firm which demands the highest quality professional service, responsibility to client needs, timeliness, efficiency and pride. Our survey crews are fully equipped and are able to handle any type of surveying project. They are trained to work closely with our clients to insure that the fieldwork that is being performed is exactly what the client needs. We routinely suggest that our clients meet our crews "at the site" so that they can better explain their needs and desires. Our office survey staff provides any type of support that our field crews need to insure a successful project. The office surveying staff at Kier & Wright has the capability to provide any type of land surveying services that our clients may need. Our survey office and CAD departments are set up to be available, responsive and accessible to our clients. We are sensitive to our client's schedules and we are always willing to try to accommodate them. We utilize AutoCAD Release 14 with Softdesk on a daily basis in our office and we have release 12, 13 and 2000 available. We are able to transfer information between our clients and ourselves electronically. The Kier & Wright office staff is familiar with the application methods and procedures for our projects. Over the years we have found that the field of Global Positioning Systems when applied properly, can be a great benefit to our projects. We have developed a successful relationship with a GPS sub - consultant that gives us an increased level of flexibility on our projects and allows us to allocate our resources in such a fashion as to place an emphasis on performance, quality control and meeting our clients needs. We view the application of GPS to land surveying projects as a specialty discipline that requires specific knowledge and a detailed specific approach that may differ in each area and on every project. Mission planning is a critical CADocuments and Settings \Jcarlough.KIERWRIGHT\Local Settings \Ternporary Internet Fi1es \0LK7\Profi1e of Finn.doc part of every project. Over the years we have found that we can break every project down into specific tasks during the planning stage and develop an approach to a specific project that provides for faster mobilization times, redundant cross checking and cooperative allocation of resources, which allows our office survey project managers to focus on the successful delivery of exactly the product that our client requires. Kier & Wright's management continually evaluates and updates equipment and procedures in order to maximize efficiency and productivity. Procedural approaches are determined by management to make sure projects are executed as efficiently as possible. CADocuments and Settings Vcarlough.KIERWRIGHT\Lmal Settings \Temporary Intemet Files \0LK7\Profile of Firm.doc • Route 85 and 237 In the 80s, the taxpayers of Santa Clara County voted a sales tax increase to provide for the construction of a new freeway and improvements to existing freeways. In October of 1987, we were retained by the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority to provide professional services for Right of Way Engineering for the proposed Route 85 and improvements to the existing 237. Our scope of work evolved into a major and significant role. We were tasked with compiling all the utility facilities that crossed the proposed Route 85 from Almaden Expressway to the south to Route 280 to the north and 237 from Middlefield Road to McCarthy Blvd. We gathered, compiled and delineated available utility information from the cities and utility companies for the use of the various design teams and utility companies. During the design phase we worked with each of the design groups to identify necessary easement requirements and coordinated the necessary utility relocations to accommodate each project. We prepared the Notice to Owner, Utility Agreements, Report of Investigation, worked closely with both the local office, the District and Headquarters. Where situations occurred where exceptions to policy were needed, we prepared the documentation and presented the request to the Encroachment Exception Committee in Headquarters. Client: Santa Clara County Traffic Authority Contact: Eileen Goodwin Phone: 408 - 453 -5373 • Route 85- Saratoga Avenue Interchange and Los Gatos Creek to Saratoga Creek Kier & Wright provided construction staking on the above two projects. The Saratoga Avenue Interchange project included staking for detour roads, railroad bridges, channel grading, roadway brides, pump stations, railroad relocation, utility relocations, curb and gutter retaining walls and sound walls. Staking of the Los Gatos Creek to Saratoga Creek project included staking for excavations bridges, retaining walls, sound walls, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utility relocations, etc. Kier & Wright was responsible for 100% of the staking under their contract. Client: Santa Clara County Traffic Authority Contact: Eileen Goodwin, Executive Director Phone: 408/453 -3777 • De Anza Boulevard Overcrossing, City of Cupertino This project widened the De Anza Boulevard overcrossing over Highway 280, including the approaches. Kier & Wright was under contract to the City as the Prime Design Consultant. As part of this responsibility we performed topographic surveys, which included both aerial photogrammetry and field work. Our office surveyors resolved the differences between the State Right -of -Way Maps and the Maps of Record for the adjoining parcels; preparation of plats and legal descriptions for both fee and easement acquisition. We provided construction staking for utility relocations in advance of the City's Contractor to clear the R/W and for the Contractor. Client: City of Cupertino Contact: Bert Viskovich Phone: 408/252 -4505 CAWIND0WS \TEMP \85237De Anza Blvd..doc RESUME OF EUGENE R. GOLOBIC, PRINCIPAL EDUCATION: B.S.C.E. San Jose State University PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Registered Civil Engineer, State of California, R.C.E. 30441 Mr. Gene Golobic's 26 years of civil engineering and project management experience is in the design of commercial and industrial projects and public works improvements. MAJOR PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENT: DeAnza Boulevard Widening, Cupertino DeAnza Boulevard Overcrossing Widening, Cupertino San Jose International Airport- Federal Inspection Services Facility (FIS) San Francisco International Airport- Boarding Area G Cisco Systems -Phase 4 @ Agnews East Adobe Systems Incorporated, Inc., Towers 1,2 &3 San Jose 303 Almaden (formerly IBM), San Jose Sun Microsystems Incorporated, Santa Clara Campus @ Agnews West North First/East Tasman Assessment District, San Jose Martinez Downtown Beautification, Martinez Santa Clara County Visitor Paid Parking Structure, San Jose B.A.R.T. Parking Structure, El Cerrito Fashion Fair Mall, Fresno Newpark Mall, Newark Area Improvement District #14, Newark Pier 39 Breakwater, San Francisco Pier 39 Marina Reconstruction, San Francisco Sun Valley Mall Expansion, Concord Route 85 and 237 Utility Coordinator Alta Avenue Assessment District, Mountain View Serramonte Acura/Cadillac, Colma C:\Documents and Settings \Jcarlough.KIERWRIGHT\Loca] Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es \0LK7\ERG.doc RESUME OF JIMMY R. VIGIL, ASSOCIATE EDUCATION: Riverton High School, Graduate 1971 Central Wyoming College: 1.5 years Evergreen Valley College: 0.5 years Emphasis in Land Surveying, Engineering, Mathematics, and Drafting. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional Land Surveyor, State of California L.S. 6256 Professional Land Surveyor, State of Wyoming L.S. 5370 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION: California Land Surveyors Association Mr. Vigil has 27 years of Professional Land Surveying Experience in the aspects of mapping and subdivision work. These areas include Tentative maps, Parcel maps, Final maps, office computations, plats and legal descriptions, lot line adjustments, lot combinations, reversion to acreage maps, easements and Alta/Acsm Land Title Surveys. Jim is also well versed in pubic land system surveys including large section breakdowns and aliquot part surveys including boundary surveys, topographic surveys and Record of Survey maps. The compiling of recorded documents in determining easement locations and boundary resolutions are also included in Jim's well - rounded career. MAJOR PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Surveying & Mapping for: Adobe Phase I & II Projects in Downtown San Jose Cisco Phase VI Project in San Jose Cisco Phase V Project in Milpitas 3Com Projects in Santa Clara Matilda overpass project for the City of Sunnyvale- CADocuments and Settings Ucarlough.KIERWRIGHT\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Fi1es \0LK7URV.doc RESUME OF TONY RUBIO, ASSOCIATE EDUCATION: West Valley Jr. College — Emphasis in Science and Mathematics Northern California Surveyors Joint Apprenticeship Program 4 years apprenticeship — graduated as a Certified Chief of Party PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional Land Surveyor, State of California L.S. 7575 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION: California Land Surveyors Association Mr. Rubio has been surveying since 1974, and has been a Party Chief since 1976. He has been with Kier & Wright since May of 1992. He worked as a Party Chief until May of 1994, at which time he came into the office to provide technical support for the field crews. He is now the Survey Supervisor for the Construction Staking; Department in the Santa Clara office, and attained his Professional Land Surveyor License in 1999. His main expertise is in Construction Surveys, but is also well versed in Boundary and 'ropographic Surveys, G.P.S. Surveys, As Built Surveys and Monitoring Surveys. He also was an instructor for NCSJAC Apprentice Program from 1989 until 1996. MAJOR PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Surveying for: Cisco Campuses in San Jose Adobe project in Downtown San Jose Mercado Shopping Center in Santa Clara Nortel Campus in Santa Clara Exodus project in Santa Clara McCarthy Ranch project in Milpitas Light Rail project from North First Street in San Jose to the station at Old Ironsides and Tasman Drive in Santa Clara Proposed Super Conducting Collider site east of Stockton in portions of San Juaquin and Stanislaus counties (Conventional & G.P.S.) Drainage Studies centered around Morgan Hill (G.P.S.) Aerial Mapping along the 101 Corridors between :Novato and Healdsburg Two -mile portion of Highway 85 Water Treatment Facility in Fremont Lawrence Livermore Nation Laboratory including layout for a portion of the S.D.I. project CADocuments and Settings \Jcarlough.KIERWRIGHT\Local Settir gs \Temporary Intemet Fi1es \0LK7\TR.doc Ignatius Po Lam, PE Geotechnical Manager Mr. Lam participated in 6 toll bridge seismic retrofit and design contracts, including east span replacement of San Francisco — Oakland Bay Bridge ( SFOBB). These contracts resulted in significant advancement in the state -of- practice in geotechnical engineering for design of major long -span bridges. Mr. Lam contributed in some of these advancements and the experience gained from these projects, specially from SFOBB project would be invaluable for the proposed bridge project. Mr. Lam is active in professional activities in earhquake engineering and foundation design. He authored the Foundation Design Section of ATC -32 and the FHWA Guidelines on "Seismic Design of Highway Bridge Foundations ". He has lectured in a number of FHWA workshops on seismic design of bridge foundations. He is also leading the effort, in two NCEER/FHWA contracts to upgrade seismic design and retrofit guidelines for bridges. Key Projects San Francisco — Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement, Bay Area, CA: He is the lead geotechnical coordinating different aspects of geotechnical design including subsurface exploration, geophysical exploration and data interpretation, development of pier specific design ground motion, and design of foundation system. Deepening of Pier C, Port of Long Beach, CA: EMI completed a series of numerical dynamic, soil - structure interaction analyses to evaluate the feasibility of the concept of installing a submerged cantilever bulkhead for stabilizing a gravel dike prior to dredging for deepening of Berths 24, 25, and 26 at Pier C. The finite element analyses took into account existing versus constructed configurations, stiffness characteristics of the pile groups and deadman, liquefied versus non - liquefied soils, and reinforcing effects of the pile foundations. Pier 400, Phases 1 and 2 Container Wharf Design, Port of Los Angeles, CA: EMI is providing seismicity and dynamic soil - structure evaluation for this project in support of the POLA design team. The project consists of design and construction more -than 7,000 feet of new container wharves along the north and northwest faces of the Pier 400 landfill. EMI updated the seismicity for the project and performed dynamic soil - structure interaction analysis of the dike - pile - backland configurations to estimate dike deformations and stresses and bending moments in wharf piles due to pile movements induced by seismic deformation of dike. EMI engineers worked closely with POLA engineers and POLADs structural consultants throughout the project to meet the schedule. New Long -Span Bridges, Bay Area, CA: Geotechnical engineer in designing the new Benicia - Martinez and Carquinez bridge. Bridge Retrofit and Design, Statewide, CA: Be led the geotechnical team for the Carquinez, Richmond -San Rafael approaches, Vincent Thomas and Coronado bridge seismic retrofit contracts as well as seismic retrofit and new design of over 500 bridges throughout California. Yerba Buena Island (YBI) Tunnel, Bay Area, CA: He is the lead geotechnical, leading the effort to integrate specialized geologics, geophysics, rock mechanics, ground motion and dynamic response techniques to evaluate the vulnerability of the YBI tunnel. Credentials B.S. / 1973 / Civil Engineering M.S. / 1974 / Civil Engineering E.D. / 1976 / Civil Engineering Professional Engineer in California Hubert Law, PE Senior Engineer Dr. Law is a key project engineer for new designs and seismic retrofits of several major toll bridges for Caltrans; all are scrutinized by a peer- review panel. His toll bridge experiences include development of foundation substructures for the global bridge models to effective interaction with the structural engineers. He also participated in numerous peer - review meetings to ensure the quality of technical works. Dr. Law is involved in NCEER research contract on lateral performance of large diameter piles and the group effects on p -y curves by using three - dimensional finite element method. He is a co -author of the NCEER report entitled "Soil Structure Interaction of Bridges for Seismic Analyses ". He is also a part time lecturer for graduate courses at the California State University at Long Beach. Key Projects New San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge, Bay Area, CA: Led the efforts in ground motion development, soil - structure interaction analysis, rock. engineering and other geotechnical design issues. The project includes a self - anchored suspension bridge and 2.1 km long viaduct structure. Evaluated designs of high - capacity tie -down anchor and large pile foundation in rock using rational mechanics. Examined rock slope stability of a large excavation area planned for construction of the bridge support. Developed seismic loading criteria and multiple support excitation for the design of the entire bridge structure. New Benicia - Martinez Bridge, Bay Area, CA: This new toll bridge is a segmental box structure crossing a major strait in the Bay area. The typical foundation includes a group of 2.5 in diameter piles socketed in shale. Provided all aspects of geotechnical design parameters including seismic loading. New Carquinez Bridge, Bay Area, CA: This new suspension bridge is located at a poor site, especially at the south anchorage. The design of the south anchorage includes 380 piles driven mostly battered in soft clay and shale. Lateral load from the cable as well as seismic demands are crucial for the design. Existing Bridge Retrofit Projects, Statewide CA: lather than new bridge projects indicated above, Dr. Law was involved in the seismic retrofit design of the following toll bridges in which he provided foundation analyses and seismic soil - structure interaction tasks: • Existing Carquinez Bridge; a 1,000 -meter long twin steel -truss bridge in Vallejo, California • San Diego — Coronado Bay Bridge; a 2,262 -meter long concrete box girder bridge with a 90- degree- turn alignment in San Diego, California • Vincent Thomas Bridge; a 765 -meter long suspension bridge in Long Beach, California • Richmond — San Rafael Bridge; a 4535 -m long steel truss bridge in Richmond, California Credentials 1985/Mining Engineering M.S. /1987 /Geological Engineering Ph.D. /1991 /Civil Engineering ( Geotechnical) Professional Engineer in California . y . - . " , " � - . , , I , I If." z� .� l* i:., i 'A 1, �,� "'t.:., ! '. , .. " � 1� 11 ,-. OT ," lh,�;- , %` L - i � ;� � "" ;; . . . � , �, , -, '. , , � ) A --. - I �, M " , �i �', i. I I _,�-, , ... 6 ", ; ;- � , , : I , , ,. I �,,,� -i-'� , 1 " -. " '.� . -" ij�, i. �, ., , � ": ,I . - '. ...I:. " 1, . , � I �-,, ", '. , ; , � '. . ll�, ,,,,, . ., - �t Q,y; - , ,.* -, , , . - !; '. ,. , : - � 'i .. , , ,I � " - 1, . �- � , � , , --.-,' ,; . , . " , '. , I '.I , 1; I , 1, , �- - I � I . .. � � . , . � . � ,� , , ,� , , �-:' , , I * ;�' q, -4 - , - f ; - - , ,* � 4 ;� 1 , - � ��,-�'. . ., , , , , , !. -�' � j , ,: - , , 1 �' - - i, - , I -� ; r , , :; ": . , , ", 1. I - - . � � � . . , , :. i v� - , - - - , - .1 'I �� -.;� I . � .. -- , , , . . i , k , � " .., .-- '! �-',.! , ,� �. . " i7l:. �', . " . " " - I �1, - . , ". , � , � I � .� , , , ,. . . - ; ..... . : :,. : * ". . . - .,�,.. ,.?-, �q?l,- -*,�; , 1. v", z - .. I. �; ,.. I � i. I 11 . � . "".1 , ,,: - ,,, ,N' J[ 1 ;7, , .".'..;' ." , , ;. m, �;.".,t '. '. -� . , - . . , .. .Tl � ."� . ,% .1, .. .1 t , '. ., i- ,;,, - I - T: ". .'. " 1�, . �!',� , , � �. . ... F % , - . , i , 4 , . . I . i a I , . , '. , - I 1; , �, .4. . ." , � . -',N' �l I � .�.: 44 . , "I � ; ., � I � 7 I ;t, " . . , L , , . . - � �,,.� t, -, I " .'� .., , , ;!. - ,� , , , ': , ,- ,� '. � 1 � - . - 1. - , � ,,�. ,, 1, , . , . ., - � �­ �. .. ... . . , , � - I ., � . , . "", � , -.1 I. i I � .., ;, 11 � " - � �:: " . , . , 1, , . - . . ; ..., .-- .. , . . , . 1:� , - ,., -�. , � ... �� , -,: .. I.. ', ;- 11 , 11 " I i - '. � , , I �,� ,�j.li. *7 . 7 I ,- - I � . I �-; , �, � ,,,;! , � - 6 , , - � .; ", �-. ­ , , . " � - ... 1% %.� , . , ." ll-� - , " . .T. .; 11 I , . I I I � - � ". . �- - ". ; , . , , �, 4 � �-, ". ,. ,I �.,, ; 1,� - �. , . . . , t . . ,� t� �;, ': * � � - , - , . , . �.,�.; . . ; ", ". , . , , ! � - ". i, -': , -, A 1: I, - " , , , , � .,. � 'i x , � � �, �i . . �'- , , ,� :", I" � - , 11-1 , " � - .-*,, . . �� ,-,'.�- ". � , , 1 �- , .. '. It , . �.-il� .. V - , . . ";.4%,� , , , . - . I .il- , , - �`,'-,'i �M-� - ., . . , ...; �` I 1P. I � .. , .. I ., " . , . . ." '.1 � , :. I , - , - : ,. 4 i . , . " . - : , .� - � , , -� 10 a., - p , , .11. : *. -., : I * i., �:-. " ,- .1. , . � , I . - � � 1 .. , .. 1,�, , , , . - - , : - , . , i , lo ". � - . , - , , , " I � , � .. .,�;l i ,� * ,;* , , ., 1. , I; I -; L :. � , I - � � - X'� � . rl� . '. , , I Ill , , . " ,�` . , k �, 1',: , , , 4: ... I . .' t "., ; -, -, I 11 ;c i ".., .. , . '. , , ; `;� - � , :. ." il.; ... .1 � . ,; �. -. I.. "t , �- -i , . , . iy. , ,". . , � 11 - .. , I. . . , " . , �, f. ; , 'i , , . .. I... I � . �-� " ,;. , ;� ... , , , , k vi . , , , " . . . , . . . - , . . . - . ,. , 'l, �,: ,� - - -t , �,- .. - . -, , , ; , - - ;. T .tt, -,. , I . !,�, : �", . . - , � ��:.l � � .. . , . , I I. " - '. ,,� �- , � , - " , ...... . -1 . , . . , . � - 1.11 , , 1 , , , ., ,�, . �,� , .. c, ; . . � I 1. . . � 1 , , 1; : . , ,. ,�. . ." - . . , - . , - - 11 - I . . , - - � .1 - .t'l, .. r � .1 � , , -�, ; ...... �', V.- � ; � . , . ,1� � . ! ; ;;-",�' U ql,�.,;, k : -.,� � , I , �-, . , - � . - 1. . I . , .; . . . ., ,.!Z:.;, , . 1, . . `.;'. �� I V. '. ; :" ,T - � , � � . . � . - " . . . , , , - i , . ., " , , - I ,-, � , , .� , , , '. , - .., " . , 'r. t , , .1, � .; �., ,� - ,-�., , , I . , - , , -, , . !�, . . �. , . . . , . ,� . . ., "- . . . - " - . . , , , , � , . . , .� " � ... � - , . � , , , , , - :.. , , , � . - , t . . , � , � , - i ! . ,... � , I I I .;; `- -1. �l - .� , , - ;. I . .. � I , . ,:, , . "'. , .;; 11. :1 - �- ". ,:,.;� I � � ,; , .. % " . , �, ,- l .�, . , , , , ' ' r' . , . � .. , �. . , . , , . , , , . , ,, , . , -. 1, . . . - I , i , , . . . , . , � . " . - , . , , . 1 � , � . . - . , , - , ,- , . . , ., , �� . .. - ., . , ': , .. �� . . . , , , , 1. � �, ,�� , `,� , . , . : 11 04 ;., - i. , I : ,-, !'� � . I , . - , . , " : � " , , . , � �. - � . . .. . , . , ; , . � - . , , . , . - - , , " . . ".., I ,, "; -;, . , . . . � , %�, -, . i , ':T . . , ; -, -, ; ", A' ':. ! . , . , - i ? .�, ;: 1: , � .� �, ,.... . , ,- . . , . ., .1 , ,. - - . r . I .� t .:,f . , . . .. .1 w. 41 " �, , - : .� , r, . � - 'I .. , -, ; i . " �- , ;.� i . . . . , , . , , , -Z, , �, , *� , : ;, i v; , � , , .1 � . - l . - . '. . , . I v .; _:.- !, ,- - i ,;, . i .. , - I �l ,;� � , 1 , , � I.: 17 e.�.-' I: �' ',-, ;r. -.1 .. I - . ,�, - - � ,.- -; " . .j ., - I .�-� . ; 17 1. . I �. . . -, - - � , , , . - - ... , - . . � , , , . .. � . . , " , , , � . , , . ,; , , � , , . � . . ., , , ., ; ., - � , , , , , . � I . I I .i . . � i � , )., :, I � ;. � .. . , i , .1 �� , ; " I .1 : 'J-, , . I .1, - - , I * --, - -� , -��,� ,e , -,�* I - , I I . - I � f i . ,; , � '" , I . � �� , 11.1, ,; !r' . , . :-, � � � �, I -. -� i�'..,".".... ".�', I I 11 , . . : . - . , . . � . i - . , : - . . . ; ,��:!, � . , - I - i .: ,, , . - - 1. , , ': .1 � -,( ,�,, 1 1 , . 1. . ..". . � . , . - - : , : ,� � : � . -, I . , . ': ... 1� ., ; i.-;,. 'J., , . . . �g , , . . , .. . 1 , : ,.. � z , , - . . , -; � ; liml. -, �'�-- - '. �'. , , . 1. .. W! . . , � � . - , �, * . - ,: r 1�1 _ ( I , i;�7�,,,;�;i� ,�, " � I'Ll * ,-. , .. - � . '. m . - . . , , . I ..' -,� � , I .� ..,, . , ., �, , . ". . : ., � - � T: � -V� ."� iel, - ' " � � , - � . . . ' � , ;. .'�� i, I - �, i ,.� - , � : 'I .'! , , . , � 11 .. ,:; -,. . t 7 . - " � ,�- �': ..* 1, : , � , �, p.. - , -�.. I :,� , . " , . ,. : 1, I . a . .1 ., -, , . . - !� kl,: -,-. ,; I , ". . � � , . . � � . . . ,., , - , '�;.,!,. 1, .. . .. . � .. . , * 1-1 - ,.:. *�;, 111 1, I - . . .: -:.:.,.-�'. . - . . . , . 1 .1 .. f � ., . " . , -� 'k ... .7 �� , . ,- .1 I i ! Ir. i. ".t � . I , -, . . . . �,, � *r - �41,1',.' �., I - . , �� ,. ,� . . , - , - - -.� , . � ! ", (.. . �.�: . . . - I . '�4 '. �. , . - :- I I '.! , .: . -.-� , .1 I. i, ", �., . . - 1. , , -�.;%I_ j , -� 1-� �-,.:-' '. !�:�, ,!..'l 4 -,.. . :�!; �.�. :.. ,4 -,, : � � ; � " t ". - .. - �., - , ,-. - , . �� . . 1, ': � � , : �. �;, w .� , - ,., , � . . . , , , . , . ,,!. " .. ii�-, . 1-1 ", i".�� ..... ;-- - :. , :,I. , � , , �, I . , ; -.1 : - . . , ,:� -, , !,:!, �: ,11 , . .. - . : � - ... . , . ; . - ,�� . , � - � .,o f - , i �, , T '. . � , : , , , , � I,' ? : , ., " � ­. , , ;l.. , .:� i I I -, . - 1� I , d , 11 � '� . , � I , . �. . � - , . . ", ;!, ;. - ;..-i 1` � I.' I , ,. - . , -I ", . , f I : A " � � :'. , � ! -, t . . . I , ..� � , , " , � ", I �� � .". � i . -i ; .; "; ., . . .:. , . .. � .':- ,;L , .1 - . . ­ �.g , - � � - , ,, - j , .'. . . , ,,, t , , I , 1, . , , . � i . , . . - .. 1. I ,. " .-, � �. .. �, - , 'I ., . � 1. . , I I -, ", -`l I , �.: . `� � ,, �� ,� . L .. la . 1, I I � 'i-1 I -': ---�! . . � . . ; - , ., , , j'. . . .�, . . :, � �. � , I , I -. -1: ,,.-; .; ,- ,� -* 11 .. , . , - , . , . , " - , I . .. - ., , ; . . , , - ,� I I , " , -; , , , , , "I .... -`,11-";l�'- �,r- � - - - I �1. � .. �- - , I . . . � I ", . . - i . .� , .. � , !, - - - � . , ! , � ,:; � ; ,, , . . , . . .. :: ,.,!,-, �* x : ..'i � � ... � . , - --,�, !." , - ; : - .- �l : , � , , - , - , 1. .. "..'. , .4 - I.,. �' ft;. � I .. � . : -:*' � , 4 , 11 -11 �:j -i, . -- �` I - I . �.,: � , , - " : �-, i , , . . I - . .. , , 1� : . .. � . I I , - .; . r la� :-�- ... - I , , * 't -,� - I ', . , F ��:, � , : .- � 1 ,,'t-", .. . . " "" . . . . ,, , t :. � . I 1.� - . ,-� , � , " , . � . , .. , : , . � ... � " . .. . � .! . '. , , ,..,,: 1. I - . , - , -, - I ; I � ., �-, 4 . ', -, '".. , 11 " - , �. . ., : I . sil%�- ----,,%---- 'T.- ", .. �V , .r . , . I . : � .J. -- , .. - t - .. t .% I . *, %�: ;:� ... - I I 1. . . -t! `� . - , ': , � �: . . . 't , - . , ,-. - 'I I. - . �:;, - ..-. ,;,,'*.':.:. ,-.: - , . . ". ;�O* . � . I . . .. , � : ., - �, -. . , .. � � � .1 I v � .. . , . � �-1 . . ; t;,: ; ,. . . , , � �.'�, , , I ." i- -,-; , , �, . .1 . I - I I � *' - ,- : :. � I I I q �,- �,�,� � -1 . ;, - . , r . 1: ., " , , , 1. - . , .11 . .I- � . - : ! - .. - � I ..11, - . . - ,q ! -�' .. : , , I' ", . , 1 " - ��:! � . - , : . . - - � 1-1t, ,A. ! "' , � '�-":- : ': L.,. - .� %�- �.- ".. * , .11 I . 1� _ . ;!,-. � , , , � ,�'". .. I 1. I � - ` . . . - . I.. .�.*. . . �,, , I . . . , - - .� �, : " I I - I , - � � � - � : P. : . - ..-I :! .,:!., -, ,, - . . . .-,��: I.-,.:,. , .1 , , ., . 'I'. .."., . .� - . - - , .; 1� . I I . . . , : I ! . .1 I ,4 • � I . . , . I , '. ;;; I , .. 11 . �l - - : . I . . . ; I I .11 .1 .1 . � ,-. 1, � . , . , , ... m. �. , � :. , �: . . , . I :' : . . I I , , : - . . . � , , I i f, I t � 1. . , . , I : I . .. . . . :.- .1 ..., , . .. . . � , : . � � -1 I , . - .. , 1. . I ! . . - ., . : a - . . � :o :: . . .-. I I . , . . ... I. - ! � � , , � : . . ;; . . ; I , .. I . .. - I I . - p . 1 . . , . ` .. . I � I ", . . . I . � .... . ... . ;- . �.4 I � � , 1 � :.. '. . , , I- , I . I . , , . � . I ! .1 . . : I - . , . - I 1. . . I - . I . I . I -! ; . ! � � " . r , I - � : . . , . : � � . ; , - - .. . . 71 . - � . - I �. . . , . I � . I , .., � � 1. - 11 . , - 1, . q . - , .. , ; � 11 I : I �. , I . I . I .. ,,, I .. a "• . . .1 .�: , ., 's, ., .1. . I . . � I I I * , � m .. I '. I I I I I .. .� . . 1. , .. : 0 . . 1� . . . . , , : I . . �': I I - I � I 1 . � I I I .1 . . � , , . : , -. .11 , , .1 I . . . I � , - , I - � . . . . , .. � �.l I - , , , * , . . , , , , : 'q I . �. I . , � � . . I . . - * li.: I - I . � :, ��, � . :' , w , : 14� : . , , ... ,. I . I ,% . . . . . .: . . . � I , I , . I , I . ;., ,� ., . I .. I . .: . I , .. .. . I : I � : .. , a .c , , , * I , . . I �Ir SS 'n. � �„ e� �•� _.tea � . r� FIRM OVERVIEW David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. provides professional consulting services to public agencies and private developers in all areas of environmental planning. The company consists of a small group of environmental professionals with extensive experience in urban development and planning and the overall research, coordination, and written preparation of environmental documents to meet the requirements of CEQA and NEPA, ranging from environmental assessments to full environmental impact reports (EIRs) and environmental impact statements (EISs). Representative projects over the past 30 years have included more than 20,000 acres of industrial park development, twenty -five redevelopment projects, parks, twenty golf courses, trails and open space projects, a downtown arena, sanitary sewer lines and wastewater treatment plants, numerous residential developments, retail and office commercial developments, medical and psychiatric facilities, and a high voltage transmission line. Representative transportation projects include a county -wide airports master plan, light rail transit lines, CalTrain extensions and several roadway improvements including freeway interchanges and bridge replacements. Clients have included local City and County governments, numerous private developers, the California Public Utilities Commission, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense. David I Powers & Associates, Inc. has extensive experience in evaluating environmental impacts associated with urban development, particularly is the fields of air quality, transportation, noise, drainage and flooding, and urban infrastructure construction. The company has devoted special attention to these issues, since they are most frequently central in evaluating urban development. Other issues that are addressed during the environmental review process include impacts to archaeological/historical resources, vegetation and wildlife impacts, land use conflicts, visual and aesthetic impacts, energy conservation methods, hazardous materials, seismic hazards and socioeconomic impacts. David I Powers & Associates, Inc. also provides mitigation programs designed to reduce the impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appropriate mitigation provided includes Transportation Demand Management Programs, mitigation of wetlands and unique wildlife habitats, and archaeological/historical monitoring. The company provides mitigation that can feasibly be implemented in conformance with the Assembly Bill 3180 legislation requiring monitoring and reporting of mitigation measures. David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. honors a basic philosophy of providing each client with objective and thorough research, accurate identification of project impacts, and a carefully written analysis of those impacts with appropriate mitigation. The company has often been selected for projects with critical time schedules, requiring strong management and organizational control. Environmental Consultants & Planners r a 1885 The Alameda •Suite 204 •San Jose, CA 9`; 126 •Tel: 408 - 248 -3500 •Fax: 408-248-9641 DAVID J. POWERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Harkins Slough Road Bridge, EAIIS Lead Agency: City of Watsonville Contact: Mahvash Harms, Biggs Cardosa Address: 1871 The Alameda, Ste. 200, San Jose, CA 95126 Phone: (408) 296 -5515 David J. Powers & Associates is currently preparing an EMS for the construction of a new bridge within the City of Watsonville over Watsonville Slough at Hzxkins Slough Road. H.T. Harvey & Associates has prepared a draft Natural Environment Study, which is currently being reviewed by Caltrans. Two proposed bridge alignments were surveyed and habitats at the proposed bridge crossings were mapped. Impacts to both regulated habitats and special status species were quantified, and mitigation areas were planned within the project area. Nash Road Bridge Replacement Project Lead Agency: County of San Benito Contact: Dale Rosskamp, Engineer I, Dept. of Public Works Address: 3220 Southside Road, Hollister, CA 95023 Phone: (831) 636 -4170 x34 David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. prepared an Initial Study in conformance with CEQA for the Nash Road Bridge Replacement project southwest of the City of Hollister, in San Benito County. The project consisted of demolition of the existing bridge and replacement with a new bridge to restore vehicular access over the San Benito River and improve safety. This project also required compliance with NEPA, including all U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Caltrans, and FHWA requirements. Important issues addressed in the Initial Study included vegetation and wildlife, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, and construction - related impacts. Miguelita Creek Bridge Rehabilitation and Safety Improvements Project Lead Agency: County of Santa Clara, Road. & Airports Dept. Contact: Siva Darbhamulla Address: 101 Skyport Drive, San Jose, CA 95110 -1302 Phone: (408) 573 -2478 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared an Initial Study in conformance with CEQA for the rehabilitation of the existing Alum Rock Avenue /State Route 130 Bridge over Miguelita Creek in eastern San Jose. The existing bridge was a two -lane bridge structure across Miguelita Creek, with wrought iron railings on each side of the structure. The proposed safety improvements included installing weathered steel tubular railings, widening of the bridge deck, relocating the decorative railing to the south end of the bridge, and constructing a separate pedestrian bridge on the west side of the bridge. Because the project was funded with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (I1BRR) Rail Improvement Program funds, compliance with NEPA was also required. Important issues addressed in the Initial Study included vegetation and wildlife, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, traffic and safety, and construction- related impacts. ©©© ®00 �J ® ®o Guadalupe River Pedestrian Bridges Project Lead Agency: City of San Jose Redevelopment Agency Contact: Bill Ekern, Senior Development Officer Address: 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 900, San Jose, CA 95113 Phone: (408) 794 -1000 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. conducted the federal environmental review for the addition of two pedestrian/bicycle bridge projects within the Guadalupe River Park. This project involved impacts (beneficial) to the Guadalupe River Park and trail system, so a Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation was required. This project included meeting permitting requirements and interagency facilitation of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the Santa Clara Valley VVater District. Key issues involved in this project included biological resources (jurisdictional wetlands and special status species), flooding, hazardous materials, cultural resources, and regulatory requirements, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. Wolfe Avenue Widening Project EIR Lead Agency: City of Sunnyvale Public Works Department Contact: Mark Dettle, Director of Publin. Works Address: 456 West Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94088 -3707 Phone: (408) 737 -4951 In 2001, DJP &A prepared an EIR evaluating three alternative proposals of the City of Sunnyvale to widen Wolfe Road, generally between Eleanor Way and the Sunken Garden Terrace Driveway, a distance of approximately 1,890 feet. The addition of the travel lane would require acquisition of developed private property along the street frontage, between eight and 12 feet, for the length of the study segment. The goal of the project was to improve the level of service at the intersections of Wolfe Road/Fremont Avenue and Wolfe Road/El Camino Real. The EIR also evaluated right -of -way impacts of project alternatives, including grade separating Wolfe and Fremont Avenue and El Camino Real. Primary issues addressed included land use impacts, traffic, noise and vibration, air quality, visual and aesthetics, cultural resources, biological resources (ordinance trees), and hazardous materials. Greenville Road Widening and UPRR Bridge Replacement Project Lead Agency: City of Livermore, Engineering Division. Contact: Harjit Sidhu Address: 3589 Pacific Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Phone: (925) 373 -5261 In 2001, DJP &A prepared an Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the widening of Greenville Road from two to four lanes for approximately one -half mile, and replacement of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Bridge at Greenville Road. The proposed improvements are designed to improve safety at the bridge crossing, improve the design speed and traffic conditions along Greenville Road and accommodate existing and future traffic in the east Livermore area. Environmental issues addressed included land use impacts to adjacent uses, filling of wetlands, special status plant-and animal species, hazardous materials, and cultural resources impacts. 0 M-01 +! �• 9 JOHN M. HESLER ENVIRONMENTAL AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNER/ANALYST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1982 - Present Environmental Specialist/Planner David J. Powers & Associates, Inc., San Jose, California • Research and prepare environmental documents required under Federal and California laws including Environmental Impact Reports, Environmental Impart Statements, Environmental Assessments, Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, Section 4(f) Evaluations, Historic Property Reports, and Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit Applications. • Provide detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts of proposed private sector development and government sponsored projects, identify mitigation measures, and prepare mitigation monitoring plans. Assist in compiling appropriate findings. • Provide experienced assistance and support in preparing planning and environmental analyses for a variety of complex transportation projects. This has included CEQA and NEPA documents for freeways, interchanges, bridges, major streets (both new construction and reconstruction), bicycle and pedestrian corridors, and airport planning. Related work has included preparation of support material such as mitigation and monitoring plans, feasibility analyses, identification of areas of impact, hazardous materials surveys, and alternatives evaluations. Project Manager for preparation of environmental reports on the following projects: San Jose to Gilroy CalTrain Extension, Guadalupe Corridor Serpentine/Asbestos Public Health Risk Assessment, Route 85 (West Valley Freeway), Vasona Corridor, Runway 301 Extension at San Jose International Airport, Santa Clara/Giants Stadium, Route 237 Freeway Upgrade, Yerba Buena Road/U.S. 101 Interchange, Senter Road Widening, Santa Clara County Airports Master Plan, Lawrence Expressway HOV Lanes, Menlo Oaks Corporate Center, Watsonville Transit Ctr., Reid - Hillview Airport Tie - Downs, Cochrane Bridge and Pacheco Creek Bridge Replacements, Moffett Technology Ctr., Route 87 Freeway Upgrade, Riverpark Center, Route 17 at Lexington Reservoir Interchange, Reid - Hillview Airport Closure, San Jose International Airport Master Plan, 880 /Tasman Interchange, Great Oaks Water Tank, and Metcalf Road Safety Improvements. 1981-1982 Environmental Planner /Analyst Santa Clara County Transportation Agency/Transit District • Reviewed environmental documents from loi -,al and regional agencies for adequacy regarding transportation- related issues. • Conducted airport and expressway noise monitoring for the Agency. 0 Worked on preparation of environmental documents on all Agency and Transit District projects, including the Downtown San Jose Transit Mall, Montague and San Tomas Expressways HOV lanes, and the Guadalupe Corridor. EDUCATION. Bachelor of Arts. - Environmental Studies —1981 (Impact Analysis/Transportation Planning) San Jose State University PR OFESSIONAL OR GANIZA TIONS: Association of Environmental Professionals South Bay Transportation Officials Association Environmental Consultants & Planners J 1885 The Alameda • Suite 204 • San Jose, CA 95126 • Tel: 408 -248 -3500 • Fax: 408 - 248 -9641 85 JOHN SCHWARZ - PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Project Manager, David J. Powers & Associates, Inc., San Jose, California (2002 — Present, 1998 — 2000, 1994 -1997) Provide environmental consulting services for a variety of development projects throughout the Bay Area and California. Prepare Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Initial Studies, Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), and Environmental Assessments in conformance with requirements of CEQA and NEPA. • Provide detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts, identify mitigation measures, develop alternative design solutions, and prepare Mitigation and Monitoring Plans. • Responsible for the entire project life cycle, from proposal development through product delivery and client support. • Advise public agencies and private sector clients on CEQA processes and procedures. • Deliver presentations before decision - making bodies, explain environmental processes and technical reports, and respond to questions at public hearings & meetings. • Coordinate with applicants, subconsultants, and local planning staffs in processing environmental documents. • Project Manager for preparation of environmental documents on the following projects: Oakland Road Widening Phase H Project, King Road Phase 11' Widening Project, Nash Road Bridge Replacement Project, Amador County State Route 49 Bypass, Interstate 580ITassajara Road Interchange Improvements, Interstate 580 /Fallon Road Interchange Improvements, 1lliguelita Creek Bridge Safety Improvements Project, Ryland Silver Ridge, 851101 Interchange Project Study Report, Montague Expressway Upgrade, Franklin McKinley Housing Project, La Terraza Apartments Project, Ranch at Silver Creek Residential and Golf Course Project, Kaufman & Broad Communications .Kill Residential Project, Santa Clara Valley Water District Matadero /Barron Creeks Flood Control Project, Cisco Systems Site 6 Project, North San Jose Storm Drain Improvements Project, Redwood City Residential General Plan Amendment and Rezoning, and San Mateo Golf Course Master Improvement Plan. . Assistant Project Manager for preparation of environmental documents on the following projects: Santa Clara Valley Water District Adobe Creek Watershed Project, Santa Clara Valley Water District Instream Recharge Program, Palo Alto Golf Course Master Improvement Plan, Confluence Park Improvements Project, Tamien Station Area Specific Plan, Bohannon Industrial Park Federal Express Facility, Los Alamitos Creek Trail NEPA Documentation. Manager, Strategic Alliances, Sierra Atlantic, Inc., Fremont, California, (2000 -2001) Responsible for maintaining and developing relationships with Sierra Atlantic's strategic partner accounts in order to services revenues. Coordinated and developed partner marketing and sales programs. Major Account Representative, Gartner Group, Inc., San Jose, California (1997 -1998) Responsible for renewal and growth of existing contract revenue from two of Gartner Group's strategic accounts. Position included all aspects of the sales process and account management. EDUCATION: Master of Business Administration - Marketing Management Emphasis (Santa Clara University, June, 1999) Bachelor of Arts - Environmental Studies (University of California, Santa Barbara, June, 1994) Environmental Consultants & Planners 1885 The Alameda • Suite 204 • San Jose, CA 95126 • Tel: 408 - 248 -3500 • Fax: 408 - 248 -9641 APEX STRATEGIES 111 Nanna Court Santa Cruz, CA 95060 (831) 460 -1530 EDUCATION University of California, Santa Cruz Certificate in Finance University of Chicago Masters of Science Claremont Men's College Bachelor of Arts, Double Major With Honors AFFILIATIONS American Public Works Association California Transportation Foundation Board Member 1998 Mineta Transportation Institute San Jose State University -Peer Reviewer for Published Research Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Chair, Technical Advisory Committee, 1996 Chair, Capital Improvement Program Committee, 1995 Self -Help Counties Coalition SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS As the Principal in Apex Strategies, Eileen Goodwin is responsible for bringing creative and proven project development and management skills to her clients' infrastructure improvement programs. She has a thorough and tested understanding of funding and delivery issues, priorities, and requirements. Ms. Goodwin has extensive experience in leveraging additional funds and community support. She provides strategic counsel based on her direct contact and established working relationships with a broad range of local, regional, State and Federal governmental entities. DESCRIPTION OF QUALIFYING EXPERIENCE Santa Clara County Traffic Authority Eileen Goodwin has ten years of responsible management experience in the public sector as Executive Director and, before that, as Deputy Director, of the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority. Over that ten -year period, the Traffic Authority completed over $1.2 billion in highway improvements on Routes 85, 101 and 237 in Santa Clara County, on time and on budget. Practical and hands -on experience in public finance, budgeting and strategic planning. Achievements inc][uded negotiation of nearly $400 million in municipal bonds and notes. Additional revenues were generated by aggressively seeking and obtaining over $160 million in State and Federal grants. Negotiated municipal and public agency donations in excess of $20, million. Created an innovative excess right -of -way disposal program generating over $16 million in additional revenue. Spearheaded the now muCh- copied public /private partnership. concept, resulting in unprecedented program management successes. Extensive experience with other governmental agencies including over one hundred regulatory agencies, numerous State and Federal Departments, the California State Board of Equalization, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Directed extensive state legislative program covering a wide range of issue areas. APEX STRATEGIES AwARDs Grand Award 1995, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Excellence in Transportation 1995, Caltrans Tranny 1995, California Transportation Foundation, Outstanding Project 1991, California Transportation Foundation, Special Award Silver Anvil Finalist 1995, Public Relations Society of America Woman of the Year 1994, Women's Transportation Seminar Outstanding Business Woman 1993, American Business Women's Association Award of Merit 1991, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Silver Winner - Excellence in Design 1991, International Astrid Award Ms Goodwin created and directed the Traffic Authority's public image, including strategic positioning of the agency. A 1996 poll showed that 873/o of Santa Clara County voters approved of how the Authority administered its tax revenues. She was responsible for an award winning community outreach program and a model community input process. Extensive experience as spokesperson for the Authority, including interaction with trade, general and national media and as facilitator and speaker at hundreds of public meetings. Represented the Authority with numerous boards, commissions, and local, regional, State and Federal agencies. Key contact and negotiator with effected jurisdictions for political and technical issues. Broad experience in leading complex discussions at all functional and political levels. San Jose Real Estate Board As Director of largest local real estate trade association in California, Ms. Goodwin transformed the Association's community outreach program and conceived and directed an award - winning publications program. Managerial and advocacy responsibilities and'. strategic involvement in all major policy decisions of association. Hughes Communications Incorporated Pioneered marketing strategy for start -up satellite communications company. Achievements included management of all marketing presentations and materials, creation and direction of corporate videos and leadership of company involvement at trade shows. Relevant Projects: Clark County Public Transit Benefit Authority (C -Tran) Provide strategic plan development and deployment services to transit district in Clark County Washington. Provide facilitation and training regarding strategic planning process as well as effective techniques for communication with stakeholders. Developed goals and key performance indicators that will be used to measure progress toward achieving each goal. Developed the 2002 Strategic Business Plan to support plan deployment throughout the next budget cycle. Lynne Griffith General Manager C -Tran 2425 NE 65th Vancouver, Wa. 98668 -2529 (360) 696 -4494 County of Santa Clara, Department of Roads and Airports Provide funding analysis and strategy for Countywide Landscape Master Plan for the County Expressways (2000) as well as funding strategy and community outreach services for current Comprehensive County Expressway Planning Study (2002). Elements include funding analysis, prioritization process, meeting facilitation and community involvement. Mike Murdter Director Roads and Airports Department 101 Skyport Drive San Jose, Ca. 95110 (408) 573 -2438 The Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) Provide strategic planning, -facilitation services and funding expertise to TAMC in support of a Transportation Expenditure Plan for Monterey County. The Expenditure Plan is a strategic planning document that covers a 20 -year timeframe. Services provided include development of a framework for coordination of all transportation project and funding prioritization, cost - benefit analyses, and support of public education efforts. Debbie Hale Deputy Director Transportation Agency for Monterey County 55 -B Plaza Circle, Salinas, Ca. (831) 755 -0903 Water Transit Authority Provide public relations services for the Water Transit Authority (WTA). The WTA, a regional agency, was funded by the California Legislature to conduct the planning studies to enhance commuter ferry service on San Francisco Bay. Specific assistance provided includes market research development, strategic planning for key messages and project identity as well .as community outreach support. Tom Bertken Executive Director WTA 120 Broadway San Francisco, Ca. 94111