Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
.02 U-2009-09 Kiddie Academy
CITY OF City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 C O P E RT I N O (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Agenda Item No. 2 SUMMARY Application: U-2009-09 Applicant/Owner: Cindy Cheng Property Location: 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard Agenda Date: Tanuary 26, 2010 APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT (U-2009-09) to allow an 8,400 square foot daycare facility to operate at an existing commercial building. The application also includes a new outdoor play area in the existing rear parking lot. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Use Permit per the model resolution to the City Council. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Specific Plan: Acreage (Net): Commercial/ Off ice/ Residential P (Mixed Use Planned Development) Heart of the City 1.78 acres (77,537 square feet) Building SF: Building Height: Floor Area Ratio: Parking: Project Consistency with: General Plan: Zoning: Environmental Assessment: 25,200 square feet 26 feet (one-story) 32.5 93 spaces Yes Yes Categorically Exempt 2-1 Kiddie Academy Daycare Center U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The project site is located at 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard, between Blaney Avenue and Portal Avenue. The site is located east of the Cupertino Executive Suites and west of Yoshinoya restaurant and an office building. There are single family residences to the north of the site and to the south are townhomes and the Marketplace Shopping Center. Currently the site is occupied by a furniture store. On January 22, 2008, an Architectural Site Approval was approved for modifications to the existing 25,200 square foot commercial building and parking lot improvements (ASA- 2007-16) to accommodate the conversion of the large single tenant space into fifteen (15) tenant spaces. Tl1e applicant has decided not to proceed with the large tenant conversion project and instead proposes a daycare use to take up approximately 8,400 square foot of existing building space (approximately 33 % of the total building space). DISCUSSION: P1~o~osed Dao care Use According to the General Commercial ZOning District, daycare centers require a Use Permit. In addition, the proposed project requires final approval by the City Council due to its size being in excess of 5,000 square feet. 2-2 Kiddie Academy Daycare Center U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 3 The daycare provider, Kidc Day of operation: Hours of operation: Maximum Capacity: Childcare Staff: Administration: lie Academy, provides the following operational information: Monday thru Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. (staff recommends 7:OOa.m. - 6:30p.m. 143 children (Infant to school age) 15 3 Typically, special considerations are required to allow businesses to open prior to 7 a.m. based on the General Commercial Zoning requirements. Given the project's proximity to residential use and the hours of operation associated with recent daycare approval across the street (Growing Tree - 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.), staff recommends that t11e hours of operation be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Outdoor Play Area State law requires that daycare centers provide outdoor play areas for children. The applicant intends to meet the state requirement by providing approximately 5,050 square foot of play area directly behind the daycare center. The location would enable the children to use the play area without having to cross the driveway or parking lot. The play area is set back 76 feet from the residential property line to the north, 16 feet from the property to the east and 220 feet from the property to the west (see site aerial on page 3 of the staff report). The proposed play area will consist of: • Three (3) play structures, divided by age group, and individually fenced • Grass landscaping around play structures • Six (6) foot perimeter fence • Protective bollards around the north and west perimeter of the play area, spaced every five (5) feet to protect fence from cars (If warranted, Planning Commission may require additional curbing along the perimeter of the play area to provided further protection). • Landscaping near the perimeter fence Parking Lot Connectivify The General Plan (Policy 4-9) encourages properties with frontages on major streets (i.e., Stevens Creek Boulevard) and secondary streets (i.e., North Portal Avenue/ North Blaney Avenue) to provide direct access to driveways from the secondary streets in order to improve public safety and vehicular circulation. In commercial areas, cross connections and shared driveways between commercial properties enhance pedestrian activities and facilitate for more efficient use of land/site design. All of these factors can help bolster businesses and shopping activities. Consequently, it has been a common practice of the City to require reciprocal access easements and/or physical improvements to facilitate parking and driveway connections between commercial properties. 2-3 Kiddie Academy Daycare Center U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 4 In the early 1980s the City required the adjacent (easterly and westerly) property owners to record reciprocal access agreements as part of their development approval with the intent to complete a driveway connection along the rear of the properties from North Blaney Avenue to North Portal Avenue. ~I 2 0 r~ ~,. r i L ...W ~: .3 ~h' ' e*i ~Mp-a~4 ray ~~ ~~ L~ _ ~ ~.~a ____._.- :' f 4k} f ::' 1 ~. ~ w ~ 'W I ~Mi ayYy. w y 1 F`' !'i:a. ~ '. `,:..E ~ .: ~ ..~ r.' ar7lL ...h ...:i: _.. ... _..1~._. a~ a..i lYb North Blaney Avenue to North Portal Avenue Connection Reciprocal Drivewau Access ~ hnprovemerits As part of this approval, the applicant is required to record a reciprocal access easement benefiting the adjoining properties (to the east and west) and make the necessary improvements to open up the parking lot to the adjacent properties. Based on the current parking lot configuration of the adjoining commercial properties, the following improvements are necessary to realize the parking lot connections to the adjoining properties. For the connection between the project site and the property to the east, improvement would include the relocation of alight pole, and the removal of a portion of an existing planter strip and a chain link fencing that borders the two properties. No parking stalls will be displaced. (see picture to the right). 2-4 East Co~ulection Kiddie Academy Daycare Center U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 5 • For the corulection between the project and the property to the west, improvements would entail the deletion and/or removal of approximately four parking stalls, the existing chain link fencing, two trees, and an existing curbed planter (see pictures below). Both of the property owners of the adjoining sites have reviewed the project. The property owner to the east supports the new parking lot design (including a new connection along the easterly property 1i11e) provided that noise and vehicular circulation concerns from the day care operation are addressed (see Attachment 1, noise and vehicular circulation discussed later in the staff report}. The property owner to the west is opposed to having any new connection with the project because of concerns with security issues and potential cut through traffic. Staff therefore recommends that the parking lot on the project site be designed to accommodate the future parking lot corulections between with the property to the west. Physical improvements to the western property will not be required until such time that a project triggering City d1SCretlollary review is required. ~, 2-5 West Connection Kiddie Academy Daycare Center U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 6 Additional Site Improvements on the Project Site: As part of this application, the applicant will be providing additional site improvements including new trees wells, landscape planters and swales, the existing asphalt will be resurfaced and repaired, and new light fixtures will be provided where needed. Please refer to Attachment 4 and the plan set for the detailed list of all of the improvements. A condition has also been added requiring the submittal of a final landscaping plan to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The final landscaping plan shall be consistent with the City's Xeriscape Landscaping Ordinance (including the latest State mandate on water efficiency) and use drought tolerant and pest resistant plant species to the maximum extent possible. In addition, the shrubs planted along the easterly property line must be verified by a professional arborist as appropriate for privacy screening purposes or they must be replaced with appropriate shrubs/trees suitable for screening mitigation. A condition has also been added requiring that all new lighting shall conform to the standards in the General Commercial (CG) Ordinance, and the final lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to building permit issuance. Noise A noise impact and mitigation study was conducted by Environmental Consulting Services to evaluate the potential noise impacts on adjacent properties by the proposed daycare. The noise engineer visited local daycare centers with similar size play areas and with similar number of children playing outside to establish the baseline noise levels. The primary noticeable noise would be intermittent and brief in the play area. With the types of activities typical of daycare play areas, the number of kids estimated to be outside at any given time (a maximum of 28 children at one time), and the distances between each age-related play area, these activities would be within the City Noise Ordinance limits, and would not be expected to create any noise impacts in adjacent areas (please see Attachment 5 for the detailed noise analysis). In addition, the General Commercial Zoning Ordinance (19.56.070 E.d.) requires a minimum 8-foot high sound wall between a retail and residential properties. The applicant will be increasing the height of the existing concrete masonry wall from 6 feet to 8 feet along the northern border, which will help provide visual and noise screening to the adjacent residences. The owner of the office building to the east has requested that the applicant provide an 8- foot masonry wall along the play area to buffer any new noise and visual impacts to their tenants. The applicant is currently proposing awrought-iron fence and landscaping along the eastern border. The noise analysis indicates no significant impacts to adjacent uses. In addition, the first floor of the adjacent office building is about four feet higher than the level of the play area (putting the windows at about seven feet above the play area which will further reduce noise from the play area. 2-6 Kiddie Academy Daycare Center U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 7 __ Although the noise study and the physical conditions do not indicate that there will be noise impacts, staff has added a condition requiring a new masonry wall to be installed along the easterly property boundary for the Planning Commission's consideration. Trash Enclosure Applicant is providing a new trash enclosure, located toward the northwest corner of the rear parking area. The final trash enclosure design will be reviewed by the Community Development Director prior to building permit issuance. Prepared by: Leslie Gross, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: ~~~~~ Gary Chao City Planner Approved by: ,~ ,~:~ i/~ ~ Aarti Shrivastava Community Development Director Enclosures: Model Resolution Attachment 1: Neighbor Comment Letters/Emails Attachment 2: Plan set Attac)2n~ent 3: Site Improvement List Attachme~Tt 4: Public Works Memorandum Attachment 5: Noise Study Attachment 6: Kiddie Academy Operational Information Attachment 7: Kiddie Academy Play Area Units, by Playzuorld Systems G: ~ Planning ~ PDREPORT ~ pc U reports ~ 2009ureports ~ U-2009-09.doc 2-~ CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DAYCARE CENTER IN A COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED AT 19875 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2009-09 Applicant: Cindy Cheng Location: 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, as amended, and the purpose of this title; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2009-09, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 26, 2010, and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. 2-8 Resolution No. U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "Kiddie Academy of Cupertino, CA; Cupertino Business Plaza, 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA" consisting of 8 pages labeled pages A-0, A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, L-1, E-0 and 1 except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. USE APPROVAL Approval is granted to allow a daycare center with an outdoor playground with a maximum daily attendance of 143 children. The number of children may be increased without use permit modification if the applicant can demonstrate adequate parking supply for all tenant uses to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and that the increase is consistent with any applicable Building and/ or Fire Codes (including but not limited to accessibility, fire safety, and building occupancy. 3. NOISE CONTROL Noise levels shall not exceed those as listed in Chapter 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 4. RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a reciprocal access easement benefiting the adjoining properties (to the east and west) and make the necessary improvements to open up the parking lot to the property to the east. 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit a final landscaping plan to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The final landscaping plan shall be consistent with the City's Xeriscape Landscaping Ordinance (including the latest State mandate on water efficiency) and use drought tolerant and pest resistant plant species to the maximum extent possible. In addition, the shrubs planted along the easterly property line must be verified by a professional arborist as appropriate for privacy screening purposes or they must be replaced with appropriate sl-irubs/trees suitable for screening mitigation. 6. LIGHTING All new lighting shall conform to the standards in the General Commercial (CG) Ordinance, and the final lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to building permit issuance. 2-9 Resolution No. U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 3 7. SOUND WALL The applicant shall install an eight-foot masonry sound wall along the easterly property boundary to further buffer any potential noise and/ or visual impacts. The applicant shall submit a final wall design to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. . 8. PROTECT AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 9. REVOKATION OF USE PERMIT In any case where, in the judgment of the Director, substantial evidence indicates that the conditions of this use permit have not been implemented, or where the use permit is being conducted in a manner detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, the Director shall set a date for a public hearing before the decision maker granting the original use permit, and notice a public hearing in accordance with Section 19.124.040 of the Conditional Use Permit Ordinance. 10. GREEN BUILDING MEASURES The applicant is encouraged to incorporate green building measures when feasible and/ or appropriate. The green building measures may include but are not limited to: low VOC paints, maximizing recycled building materials, using porous concrete, using energy efficient mechanical equipments and lighting (including solar energy), maximizing onsite water retention, and using draught tolerant and pest resistant landscaping. 11. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 2-10 Resolution No. U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 4 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 14. C.3 RE UIREMENTS Should pavement replacement exceed the 10,000 square feet threshold, the Developer will be required to satisfy the state mandated c.3 stormwater treatment requirements. Should this happen, the developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of storm water treatment facilities on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan to satisfy c.3 requirements is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan (subject to third party review), Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are required. 15. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 16. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 17. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 18. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 2-11 Resolution No. U-2009-09 January 26, 2010 Page 5 19. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 20. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 21. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 22. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from any agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. 23. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. 24. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers system shall be reconfigured in any remodeled or reconfigured area of the interior of this occupancy. Final fire protection plans shall be submitted to the City for A Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations and a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval new construction to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 25. PLAYGROUND ACCESS The fenced-in playground shall not obstruct emergency access to the building. Gates to this area must conform to the applicable provisions of CFC 503.6 and 506. 26. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to issuance of building permits. 2-12 Attachment 1 Leslie Gross From: Traci Caton on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning bept. Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:54 PM jo; Leslie Gross Cc: Gary Chao; Aarti Shrivastava Subject: FW: Application U-2009-06 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard APN: 316-21-031 FYI From: Anne Risberg [mailto:ARisberg@MattesonRealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:23 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Application U-2009-06 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard APN: 316-21-031 To the City of Cupertino: I represent the properly ov/ner of 19925 Stevens Creek Boulevard, which is adjacent to the proposed day care center While we appreciate the service a day care center can provide, we have the following concerns: We have been informed that cut-through drive aisles will be installed between our property and the adjacent property as a result of decades-old approvals for the site. We are concerned about traffic through our existing business environment by parents dropping off, and picking up their children, and the safety of additional traffic through our parking lot. We want to put on record that the Travigne Plaza development immediately north west of our property (at the corner of Blaney and Stevens Creek Boulevard) has caused significant parking and traffic problems through those cut-throughs to the point where we had to hire a stationary security service during business hours for a period of time to monitor and prevent the mis-use of our parking areas. Our prize tenant, Apple, vvas so concerned about the traffic, trash and general impacts on that side of the building that they considered leaving. Please address how traffic and parking will be handled by this business and how impacts on the existing professional business environment will be mitigated. _ _. -:?nd tclb6~f~ ~~.~~+j:ullci ,'IOr:ci:li.';' I''~~II~G~.:r I '-r--` Ali. Vii]. it;~~'^~i i f•1?1::.2SOfl `'crli.'y -?1',~iC.C'~; ,~~C, l'i-:i.. ii' U.l) '; .1 .1':> ~ C!i'~:• _.d;':''~: SUI'E? %nl% ! G;~=c;'i•:OOd Qi~.`r', :-,`~ ':i•=~':''r'` i ~'?:?l.!.~J[.~.':!:i :K] ~~.~ I o~lS~efq(afTl3L~2sOn~eB~tY.COfT1 ! WVJ1N.f1'1~Lt250f1C0171Don125.COfi1 2-1~4 M C P HARLIN SPRINKLES & THOMAS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TEN ALMADEN BLVD., SUITE 1460 SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95113 TELEPHONE (40s) 293-1900 FACSIMILE (40S) 293-1999 WWW.MSTPARTNERS.COt`4 January 14, 2010 City of C~apertino Plaru~ing Department 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Attn: Leslie Gross, Assistant Planner PAUL S. AVILLA AIMEE E. GOLDSTEIN KATHARINE L. HARDT-MASON LINDA HENDRIX MCPHARLIN JANE P. RELYEA ELAINE M. SEID CATHERINE C. SPRINKLES ANNE C. STROMBERG N. DAVID THOMAS Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino Dear Ms. Gross: Our office represents Angelo and Roseann Traina, Trustees, the owners of property located at 10055 Portal Avenue, Cupertino, California. Our clients' property is improved with a one story office building, which is leased to a telecommunications company, housing its engineers, and to dentists. Adjacent to our clients' property, at the intersection of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Portal Avenue, is a restaurant. The property to the north is residential. To the v~~est is a retail building that, historically, has been used as a furniture store. We understand the potential tenant for the westerly (formerly furniture store) property has submitted an application for a conditional use pernut to operate a cluld care center. We have met with 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd. property owner in an attempt to discuss our clients' concerns regarding this proposed use at the site. At that meeting, the owner refused to address any of my clients' concerns. It is our understanding that the outside play area for the center will be located along the common boundary line between 10055 Portal Avenue (our clients' property) and the child care center. Cynthia Rotwein will be forwarding photographs of the properties «7hich will better illustrate the proximity of the Portal building and the proposed play area. As you will see from the photographs, there is no sound barrier of any type between the properties. The improvements at 10055 POrtal Avenue «~ere constructed in approximately 1986, of a design and materials that ~~-ere customary at that time. These improvements, including the type and location of windows in our building, were not constructed in anticipation of a child care playground adjacent to the property and; «~ithout addressing the noise issue, 2-15 an outside play yard in the proposed location is incompatible with the existing office use. Given the type of construction of our clients' building and the fact that it is a single story structure located within 10.5 feet of the proposed play area, we feel that unbuffered noise from the play area would be detrimental and injurious to the peaceful use and occupancy of the Portal office building. For that reason, my clients request that the City impose a condition upon the operator requiring the construction of a sound wall between the play area and the Portal property in order to ameliorate the negative noise impact of the proposed outdoor play area. Additionally, v~~e understand that the child care center will have access to Portal Avenue across an ingress and egress easement over the northerly portion of our clients' property. We also would ask that any conditional use permit be conditioned upon the center operator ~rohibitiilg any "stacking" of vehicles in the ease~i~ent area. Should verucles be permitted to "stack" into the easement area on my clients' property, ingress and egress to my clients' property would be effectively blocked. Since we anticipate that trip times to the child care center and to our office building will coincide u1 morning and evening rush _ hours, my clients' use of its property (by its tenants and their employees and visitors) would be severely limited by any such "stacking." VJe hope the applicants will re-assess their initial negative reaction to our reasonable requests that it address noise generated in its outside play area, realizing that conditional uses are identified precisely because they require special review and requirements in order to fit into general commercial zoning areas. Outside uses are generally prohibited by City zoning ordinances, as a matter of right, in commercial areas because any and each proposed outside use in such a zone must be evaluated and instituted, if at all, in a mamler consistent with (and not detrimental to) surrounding uses. We would be happy to meet to discuss this matter further before any public hearing. However, should that not be possible, please be sure to provide notice of any public hearing to the undersigned and to our clients' property manager Jon Wakimoto, Wakimoto Management, 1855 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95125, and to Cynthia Rot~~~ein, Colliers International, 450 W. Santa Clara Street, San Jose, Ca 95113. My client will be represented at any public meeting. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Very ly yours, /e ~~'~t~G~ atherine C. Sprinkles cc: J. Wakimoto C. Rotu%eii~ ~. Traina 2-16 GRUBB & ELLIS. From Insight to Results January 6, 2010 Mr. Jon T. Wakimoto 1855 Hamilton Avenue Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95125-5672 Grubb & Ellis Company 1732 North First Street, Suite 100 San Jose, CA 95112-4543 408.452.5900 main 408.437.0499 fax www.grubb-ellis.com R~C'D J A ~ ~ ~ 2010 Re: Kiddie Academy Facility, 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard, San .lose, California Dear Mr. Wakimoto: At the direction of Cynthia Rotwein, please find the attached- drawing of the proposed layout for a Kiddie Academy to be located next to your building on Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino. The City of Cupertino would appreciate the owner's acknowledgement that the ingress/egress easement at the back of the property will be opened up to traffic. My client will be responsible for the cost of removing the current fencing and landscaping as well as repairing the curbing, landscaping, and any necessary repaving. You should direct your acknowledgement to Leslie Gross, Assistant Planner, City of Cupertino, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (email: leslieg@cupertino.org}. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 408-453-2352. erely~~ Martin L. Chiechi Senior Vice President 408-453-2352 License # 00806069 Encl. 2-17 N:IAdmin~Chiuhi~2C101,Correspcra'ence`,INcY,imoto O10o10.doc J 1 M~N~GEMENT INC January 11, 2010 Leslie Gross Assistant PIanner CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3202 Re: Kiddie Academy Facility 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd. Dear Leslie: This is a follow-up to the letter dated January 6, 2010 fiom Martin Chiechi of Grubb & Ellis (copy enclosed). Please be advised the property ov~n~er will comply with its obligations under the existing easement If you have any questions, please let us know. Sincerely, J.T.WAKIMOTO MANAGEMENT, INC., Managing Agent fo • Ange R. Traina Trust on akimoto Property Manager JW:ynlc cc: Catherine C. Sprinkles Cynthia Rotwein 1855 Hamilton Avern.~e • Suite 20110 QQ• San Jose, California °5125-5672 Phone: (408) 36°~8C1tT-' rax: (408) 369-0555 From: Anne Risberg [mailto:ARisberg@MattesonRealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:23 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Application U-2009-06 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard APN: 316-21-031 To the City of Cupertino: I represent the property owner of 19925 Stevens Creek Boulevard, which is adjacent to the proposed day care center. While we appreciate the service a day care center can provide, we have the following concerns: We have been informed that cut-through drive aisles will be installed between our property and the adjacent property as a result of decades-old approvals for the site. We are concerned about traffic through our existing business environment by parents dropping off, and picking up their children, and the safety of additional traffic through our parking lot. We want to put on record that the Travigne Plaza development immediately north west of our property (at the corner of Blaney and Stevens Creek Boulevard) has caused significant parking and traffic problems through those cut-throughs to the point where we had to hire a stationary security service during business hours for a period of time to monitor and prevent the mis-use of our parking areas. Our prize tenant, Apple, was so concerned about the traffic, trash and general impacts on that side of the building that they considered leaving. Please address how traffic and parking will be handled by this business and how impacts on the existing professional business environment will be mitigated. Anne Risberg ~ Regional Property Manager ~ DRE Lic. 01198586 ~ Matteson Realty Services, Inc. ~ DRE Lic. 01193115 ~ One Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 ~ Redwood City, CA 94065 p: 650.802.1800 x115 ~ arisbera~mattesonrealty.com ~ ww-w.mattesoncompanies.com 2-19 3. Contractor shall prevent debris from being deposited on adjacent mall areas, contractor shall obtain all the necessary permits required for the removal of debris from the site. 4. Contractor shall assume complete responsability for the safety and protection of workers and all other people around and about the site, as required by local regulations. 5. Contractor shall be responsible for the work compliance with codes, regulations and requirements of the governmental agendes. 6. Contractor shall verify exsting conditions at the project site as described in these contract documents prior to beginning the work. 7. In the event of conflicts and 1 or disaepandes between these wnUad documents and the conditions on site, the contractor shall immediately submit information to the designer for resolution prior to proceeding with any related work 8. Do not cut, drill through or damage any structure located within the parameters of this project without first consulting with the designer or sUuciurel engineer. 9. Contractor is responsible for checking and verifying field conditions for accuracy of locations and dimensions. 10. Contractor is responsible for coordinating the work, inducting but not limited to architectural, slrudurel, mechanical, plumbing (sprinkler system), fire protection, electrical and lighting. 11. All field welding shall be performed by a licensed welder while under the supervision of a building inspector. 12. The intent of the Contract Documents is to indude all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the work. The documents are complimentary and what is required by one shall be required by all. If the cailrad documents are not completed as to minor details of a required construction system orvdth regard to the manner of combining or installing parts, materials, or equipment and there exists an accepted trade standard (or mall standards) for food and workmanlike construction, such standards shall be deemed th be a requirement for the contract documents. 13. Contractor shall famish all labor, equipment, materials and services required or reasonably inddental to the successful completion of the work. 14. Contractor shall pay all permits and fees, licenses and inspections necessary. 15. All costs of overtime work required by the nature of this work, except emergendes, shall be inducted. 16. ConUctor shall submit all lien releases along with payment application. 17. No work defective in construction quality or defident in any requirements of the contract shall be acceptable in consequence of the owner's or designer's failure to discover. No partial andlor final payments shall be consbued as an acceptance of defective work and improper materials. 18. All horizontal dimensions are tolftom face of construction, (U.O.N.). All vertical dimensions are from top of finish floor, (U,O.N.) 19. Due to the d'rfl'iculty of anticipating every unsatisfactory condition that might exist in connection with the existing work where alteration or reconstruction work is proposed, the following clause shall be applied to any reconsUuction or alteration work; "The intent of the drawings and spec cations is to create a new or remodeled store in accordance with Title 24, California code of regulations. Should any condition developed not covered by the contract documents wherein the finish work will not comply with said Title 24, Cal'domia code of regulations, the contractor shall submit infomration to the designer for resolution prior to proceeding with any related work. KIDDIE ACADEMY OF CUPERTINO, CA CUPERTINO BUSINESS PLAZA 19875 STEVEN'S CREEK BLVD., CUPERTINO CA MAP VICINITY SCOPE OF UVORK PROJECT DATA: USE AND SCOPE: (no changes in use) ~~ ~~ USE PERMIT FOR KIDDIE ACADEMY DAY CARE OF CUPERTINO OCCUPANCY GROUP: M,B TO INCLUDE: CONSTRUCTION TYPE; V-N SITE OF PROJECT GROSS SITE AREA: 78,149.00 S.F. 1. REMOVE ALL EXISTING INTERIOR WALLS, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, 0 0 HVAC AND FINISHES TO ALLOW FOR DAY CARE CENTER FLOOR AREA: 25,200.00 S.F. rr 0 3 2. CONSTRUCT "KIDDIE ACADEMY" DAY CARE CENTER STORIES OR FLOORS: ONE STORY FIRST FLOOR 3. ADD NEW DOOR OPENINGS TO REAR OF BUILDING FOR "KIDDIE FIRE SPRINKLERS: YES AUTO ACADEMY" DAY CARE . STEVEN'S CREEK BLVD . 4. RE-STRIPE PARKING AT FRONT OF BUILDING TO INCLUDE 2-VAN PARKING: 93 SPACES HANDI- CAPPED PARKING SPACES, AND 3-LANDSCAPE ISLANDS CODES: 2001 CBC, 1997 UBC, 2002 CPC 5. RE-STRIPE PARKING AT REAR OF BUILDING TO INCLUDE 2-VAN 2001 CPC, 2001 CEC, 2002 NEC HANDI- CAPPED PARKING SPACES, TRASH ENCLOSE, PLAY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEE SHEET Al DEMOLITION GROUNDANDLANDSCAPING 1. GENERAL: Demolition is not limited to what is shown on the drawings. The intent of the drawings is to indicate the general scope of wodc required. SHEET INDEX APPROVALS; 2, Demolition shall be done carefully to prevent unnecessary damage. Damage incurred during demolition whether to mall surfaces or store shall be repaired promptly. A-0 COVER SHEET 3. Contractor shall salvage all existing equipment. Furniture (if existing) and other A-1 SITE PLAN items as specfied by the owner, Prior to starting construction or demolition, wntractor shall meetwith the ownerto decide disposition of items mentioned A-2 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN above, A-3 PLAY GROUND PLAN NOTICE: A-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN Contractor (or owner) shall verify all dimensions and sUucturel details prior to any demolition orconstrudion.Notifythisoifice,PalelStructurelEngineerstoverifyon E-~ EXTERIOR~LIGHTING PLAN -PHOTOMETRIC site conditions that require danfiration. Written dimensions on these drawings shall have precedence over scaled dimensions andcondiiions.ConUadorshall 1 ORIGINAL GRADING & PAVING PLAN verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions on the job. BY RUTH & GOI NG c-cu e~ ~ o W~ W ~, Z_ , C7 v W cWn `~ Dorn z ~ Q~ ~y~ F- a U ~~ ~;o ~ Q: ~ Y J W~ Q~ a~ Q N Q U Q J O Z Q I-- ~ ~ Q w ~ z ~ ~ W z v _ ~ W ~ D z> - J = z m I- Y W ~ m W W ~ W U = O (n (n z z W - ~ w ~ w > ~- O z ~ v W ~ ~ ~ r U DATE: 10-01-09 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN: JAH J09: OF 8 SHEETS 5 SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY A 1 ~° 6'-8' ABOVE FlNISH ~~ wn,elu mq e. GALVANIZED STE0. GRADE OF PARKING `s"d1A°~ ~' POLE PAINTED FUT LOT tdphaxnq ..._.._..... BUCK • ~ ~ I I• r c ~= ~~~ GALVANIZED PTEEL ~ REFLECTORZED ~ II-' SIGN °' _ W/ MIMMUM 1' HIGH N LETTERING • CONC. FOOTING ~. • AT BUILDING ENTRANCE e• 4 ADA SIGNAGE AT PARKING SPACE A 1 "°'~ 393.24' PROPERTY LINE (E) A/C PAVING DRIVWAY (E) OFICE PARKING Q W 0 W D J m Y LLJ W U Z W W ~_' a LLI 0 0 , I 0 ~ PROVIDE 6 91KE RACKS (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL I TO BE RELOCATED m I __ ^7 - - - r ~ ' ^ 18 ^5 I Fo I RESERRE SPRINKLER 5 I REMOVE (E) PUNTER TD ^ I I ° I I ALLOW FOR NEW BICYLE I I= I d I I= I I RACKS 5^ U I I° I I 6 i 0 (` L- J ~f Al Z 9 ^ v IW , , ^ I N LANDSCAP[ ^ (E10 PUNTER 9 a+. a ^ ~, i p 0 i i ~ (LANDSCAPE PLANTER ^ W O J' 0 1 6 ~~ . ~• w 0 °j 3 al ^ C), ® HC Tll ; ^ ro W h N ~, © O Z rnl CD a 5 ? ~ 10 O y HC , d W o , 5 I (N) ^ , LANDSCAPE PUNTER ^ , 6 , a ' ^ I 1 fi'-0" ~ I 1 - - I ^ DROP OFF & PICK UP I m AT FRONT ENTRY FOR I ~ 'KIDDIE ACADEMY" a I I ^ I I 2 0 I ^ I ® ~-l I I I REMOVE (E) PLANTER I a I I I i I II I I ^ L_J U 0 EXISTING RETAIL AREA ~ HAVE A MINIMUM 48" WIDTH. 2. AlL INTERNATIONAL SIGNS OF ACCESSIBILITY SHALL COMPLY W/ CBC FIGURE 11 B-6 & SECTICN 11178.5.8.1.1 AND SHALL BE LOCATED A7 THE EXISTING BUILDING ENTRANCE. 3. ALL GROUND FLOOR SURFACES ALONG ACCES- SIBLE ROUTES AND IN ACCESSIBLE ROOMS & SPACES INCLUDING FLOORS, WALKS, RAMPS AND CURBS SHALL BE STABLE FIRM AND SLIP RESISTANT. 3 i~ i ~ ~ ~ I -. I o 4 I I ~ :_ I~ to I " I N ~_ REMOVE (E) PUNTER TO ALLOW FOR NEW BICYLE RACKS 6 CLASS II BIKE RACK Al ~5u" II I/E EASEMENT t6'-0" IS'-0' REO.D'S ^ I 6 1 ' • • • ' z2'-D• 1e -D IB -D 2z - W 11 0_ U 0 ~ F = a z g VI Q Z W ~ W 5 a W !Y Q 3 Y ~ ^ 6 3 t0 W ~ U 2,_6. 3 TRasH A4 6 ENCLOSURE a 18'-0' 18'-D' w 0_ a ~ a uml ewx ~ 21 Z g I m z 2 ~ ~ D ^ Z 9' 8, 9' 8'-fi' I 0 a U Z • 14 14 O ^ HC HC ° To ^ WHEEL STOP, li 6 ~, wrz TYP. O 7 D O O 'O O O^ O ~~ Al 6 2 .~. .-~ . r~ --~c. -K . -~c . t 7 wavuec ' ~ ~ urz r wrz °°1AR0 ~ '1 ~ , Wi a' OIASS X ~i...~~r ~^"+ ~ ""'~~ F PLAY GROUND ~„~, W 0 c uurt 6 y~„q Cl o ~~ i i o 4b ~ o i o ~ i i i~ i i i i i o 0 (E) A/C PAVIN 2 rs. 1-1 /2' z 1-1/2' BOTTOM (E) A/C PAVING ' fi +0 -0' I I I I I I I I ~ I -1-12' DIA X 3'-0=1 I I I DEEP PIERS 0 I I I I EACH TS 3~3' 0 I I I I 6'-0" O.C., TYP. I I (n I I I I ~ ~ L_J L_J ~ FENCE SECTION W N FENCE ELEVATION Z rn C9 v 7 TUBE STEEL FENCE DTL. ,~ w A l M0 scuE ~ J O rn I ~ Z Q~ SITE DATA: ~ ~' 2- U ~,. STORY USE ANO SCOPE: EXISTING MIKED USE ~ ~ RETAIL SPACE SFR (no changes in usa) ~ j Q `~' ~ OCCUPANCY GROUP: M ~ y coNSrRUaION TYae vN J a FlAOR ARE4 25,200.00 SQ. FT. ~ STORIES OR FLOORS ONE STORY / FlRST BOOR Q t0 AUTO. FlRE SPRINKLERS: YES d ~ CODES: 2~1 CBC, 1997 UBC 2DOZ cPC, I ------------- 2001 CPC, © , 2001 GEC, 2002 NEC I , ~ I KEY NOTES: ^1 EXISTING SIDEWAUf ^ EXISTING AC. PAVING ^ EXISTING ACCESSISBLE PARKING 57ALL WRH / H/C SYMBOL 2- 4^ EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN ' STORY/ ^5 EXISTING UNDSCAPING SFR 6 NEW UNDSCAPING 7 EXfi"IINC EXTERIOR ELECTRIUL SWITCH GEAR OCTED I TO BE REL ^8 NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE ^ NEW PARKING STALL PAINT STRIPING TO I MATCH EXISTING 1 PROPERTY UNE 11 NEW CONCRETE WALKWAYS I 12 EXISTING PAMT STRIPING TD REML4N ~ 13 EXISRNC WALKWAY I 14 NEW PUNTED H/C SYMBOL ' W Z 1 NEW PUY AREA EOUIPMENi , J 1 NEW 3' WIDE PAINTED STRIPE PATHS ' Q I __-_-_ D= NBE FENCE (sea details Ihia ahaet) - 17 NEW fi 1 TOW AWAY SIGN AT PROERTY ENTRANCE ® N ' I W 0. ~ 19 INCREASE EXISi1NC CMU WALL WITH NEW CMU BLOCKS TO B'-0' ABOVE GROUND Q ' ~ d a ®BLOCK-0U'T 18' LONG OPENMG IN CONCRETE CURB FOR DRANAGE J a U r7 21 FOISTING GTCH BASIN ® PAVERS AT NORTHERN PARKING STALLS SEE n ~ 'i v1 ( r UNDSCAPE PLAN Z ' ~ ~ ®DROP-OFF AND PICK-UP LOUTION FDR ( Z 10 ^ KIDDIE AUDEMY ®ALL ASPHALT REPPIRS AND REPLACEMENT WORK SHALL MNMTNN DRAINAGE TO r n ~J I ( ~ EXISTING UTCH BASINS PER ORICIN4L l/ J I © GRADING 8 PAVNG PUN BY RUTH k GaNC W (SEE DRAWMC 1) / DENOTES ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL 2- / FROM STREET OR ACCESSIBLE PARKING - SPACE TO PRIMARY BUILDING ~ /'~ I STORY EMRANCE ~/ ' SFR ~ m I , J Q l y O s ~ .. x. 6,240.00 S.F. ~`*'Imx+~a x I Q wroi uvl 5 , l u ti~ x N 2t ~ o >; 0 5 ~ Im z CD Z O , KIDDIE ACADEMY DAY CARE x .°'"~x p ; ;;c ~~ X ~ II g ~ - •u ~i ~ / / / /2. STORY/ / // RESTAURANT AND OFFICE LANDSCAPE: FRONT OF PROPERTY: = 1,840.00 S.F. REAR OF PROPERTY: = 4,907.00 S.F. PLAY GROUND AREA: = 5,049.00 S. F. TOTAL LANDSCAPE: = 11,796.00 S. F. 15.19 OF SITE COVERAGE (6.5% PLAY GROUND AREA) (does not include lawn area on streetside oT planting strip) t 1 I$1 i ~L Z ^ ~ ,p LL F~ - I I I3 • 1. 1 r E !3 r t I d l x ,~ ~ 2 1 ~ ,9~ ~ ^ ~ ; 1) ~;~ ~ °f AI I I ~ X ® INCREASE (E} CMU WALL WTH I ~ I ~ o~ss Wit! 17 16 , NEW CMU BLOCK TO 8'-0" ~ xreo emus xtixc m•oc x - ~ '( ABOVE GROUND 1 g !w U t e' so[reix ~' a"rz 11 ^ PR P RiY IN -x - -x - -z -a ~-z - - -x --- - U~--- -------- 0 E L E EASEMENT REO.D'S (E) TRASH 1 2 STORY OFFICE LEGEND: O N0. OF PARKING SPACES SEE KEY NOTES (E) PARKING 1 / ~ (E) PARKING / NORTH REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS: PRCViDED PARKING: ZONING = C-1 REGULAR PARKING 24 STALLS (front of property) BUILDING AREA: = 25,200. S.F. 2 H/C VAN STALLS (front of property) KIDDIE ACADEMY /DAY CARE: = 143 CHILDREN/6.5 = 22 STALLS MAXIMUM PARKING 65 (uni-size) STALLS (rear of property) 1 RETAIL AREA: 16,860 S.F. 16,800/250 = 67 STALLS 2 H/C VAN STALLS (rear of property) A 1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 69 STALLS TOTAL 93 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED Q U Z ~- W U z J g m Y W W W ~ U (n Z W ~~ Lw r Cn LL1 m GATE: 10-D9-D8 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN:JAH JOB: CUPERTINO OF B SHEETS ~ o W~ Wrn _Z (7 v W cn N J ~ N Z I Q ~ ~ N ~ N U ~ ,~ ~~a ~<` I- `1 J Wa ~~ Q~ ~~ ADJACENT TENANT (unoccupied) ~ waft. sHK w/ DRAM BD. woBK TABLE 3D' x +e' mcnovAV[ (m KDT Paves w/ exxwsr thM1 Gov.) FAN ABLVE 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ U~ ~U~ ® N ~~ MW ,W 4 3 U ® 2 1 26 STACKED U U ~ cDI NEC~ _ H ] 6 5 CUBBIES AREAS REA 7 REA 4 n S ~x ~ 12 11 ~" y 10 9 ; " SCHOOL AGE 28 KIDS 5 YRS 12 KIDS 3 ^ 2 YRS 24 KIDS yn~ ~ d W 980 5F (980 SF) t2 STACKED cueBlES 420 5F (420 SF) ®®® 840 SF (840 SF) W y ]BAY SINK W/ DWV ~ 12 INFANT wND BOARDS -sroRAGE BINS AREA 1 m 0 0 i ~ / 1 I TOIL 2 0 24 STACKED ~ ~ W/D - - ~ ~~ 12F KID$ 420 SF ~. ~ ~ ,ter 1 ~ ) i CUBBIES i REF ® (421 SF) +1 ~ \ / ~ it ~1 /~I I r5~ HW , . . , ; _ _ , ~ o n ^1 1 HOUR RATED CORRIDOR ~ 1 HOUR RATED CORRIDOR ^1 ~ /~~ `~ /~4 `~ ~ ® DF ® TOIL 12 SLACKED . 1 t 1 ) ; 1 f ~ \~ \ ~ ® ® ~,--~ CUBBIES ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ LJ 5 - I 1 - , ~e ) ~ l J DF , } I ' J i . 2 - 2 cDT cLOSEr ^ >= r 2 I r ~ ~ TOILET ~ tJ ~ ~ ® 3 ~ ^ o F AREA 6 AREA 5 ®® AREA 2 NB o. ~ CLOSET 244 KDS 24 K DS '~~ 3 TODDLERS D w LOBBY ~ 840 SF (840 SF) 840 SF (859 SF) g IK pg 20 ISF I N ~ D ~~ +1 s 315 SF (3zD sfj 420 SF) o 0 an ~ DIRECTOR o r~ oa +s rN rN ~o °o ~ OWNER U U U II i ,.~ - _ - n- .- , - _ - _ -~ - _ _ I FF" ,F c' r' I ,. ::I: 1 - _ -- LC _I ~ E ,_~_F'~:~ I _ _i~ FF ~ ^F~ 'E'J.. - _ -.~. 4 1 ~ -- r I I i -. I I ~__' I ='I - ~- T~... CL-~J I, _ - _ L __ _ ... ._ '. - r F> - "- -_. __ _ ~~- - _ -- - - I I I - I I I -- - ~ ~ I mo- I - I ~~ _ _ _ - - - I I I I ~ --- 1- I __ 4 I - - - I -- -- NORTH 1 A 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-D" WALL LEGEND: KEY NOTES: 1 1 RATED CORRIDOR EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALL 2 36' HIGH DOOR (N) FULL HT. WALLS W/ 3 5/B" X 20 GA. MTL. STUD ® 3 ~" HIGH WALL 24' O.C. & 5/B' GYP. BOARD BOTH SIDES. CORRIDOR 4 DEMISING WALL (FLOOR TO ROOF) SHALL BE 1 HR. RATED. (N) WALL TO UNDERSIDE OF T-BAR CEILING OR HARD " " 6 ~ X 25 GA. MTL STUD ®24 O.C. CEILING W/ 3 5/8 NDTE: ALL FULL HT. WALLS k RESTRDDM WALLS SHALL .BE W/ Ri3 INSULATION i9 1D INDICATES 4'-0" X 4'-0" WINDOWS, 45 MIN. RATED. ALL 11 DOORS ®RATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE 20 MINlJiS RATED 12 W/ SMOKE SEAL ~ CLOSURE O z Q U W o z W ~ z U ~ U ~ ~' ~ O O ~ J Q m J LL ~-- Y LtJ w W ~ ~ W ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q z O w ~ U ' ~ Lv Q ~ W ~ 0 DATE: ID-09-08 SCALE: PS SHOWN DRAWN:JAH JOB: CUPERTINO Of 7 SHEETS N W i L/7 "^~"Cr'-J~~ )~.. t ~_.• ~: ~ ~~~ r ~.._ 1 ;~; C) 7 t~7:~ ~___ _,~ y r.~..~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~i ~ lJ ~' it1 ! T ~ ~y ~..I ~~ ~~~ ~ '~ (~ ~' ~~ --ir~~C a ~ ~~~~ ~ m C.7 ~ . v7~nv~u~~ ~~~~ X ail ;, ~,_: ~ ,r: ~ ~ ' `.; a e ~~ 9' SIDEWALK (AS PER SI~fE PLAN) --1 ~_,~: x -~ ~~ x ?i x ~c X -#~ `rl G7 ~ o ~ x G~ ~ ~ Ol7ltr'.LrJa cn (1 X d 9' SIDEWALK (AS PER SITE Pl"AN~ DC X ~: U7 cr '~ c~ C'r'i ti. i r ,,: I ~ ~ ~ E `1 ~.).1. ~ ~ c~ ~ „z-,~ ~Is~r,,a -i ~ ytf1Qa ~~,.~~~ ~. I ~ ca y X ~, ~~• W ..~ i ~ . ~ T; ~) r fJt n~ U V z :., ~ " ~ ~ rn 'S 7J U rn f7 .~ y , ; x k rn ~ ~ ,n r -~ wMt ' I ~ ~ ~ IA M w>~ ~ I ~ nl :., .~ ' t7] .........~ ~ * rC., ~ ~ I ..r. ~ , ..------- / ~ n ~ ~ r ti '~ , t }( ;n r1 ;- ~ rnrol`i ~ E `~ rr ~i m n o , :' ~' in ~' , r u ~ E E ~ r • : .~~ ~ ~ m iii }t ~ F`" j ! _...._....__ __ -...........,______....._______~ ___._-.._ ! _,..111 M _ ~ . ~ X _~...... ~ )C G 0 ~, FEN E ,.,~ ~. .r ~ ~ ~ . , ..~. X ~~,, ~ __ ~> ~ _ y to ~ ~ E (Riuur;fij "'i'd~i~ ,/'~ Ei i ~7'-7I ~ ,w '~~°-T~ 1 i x e i.. ~:.. r ~~~~~ __ a ,~ ~ ,.~ ~S;C I i:~. -wit r .. .f~ -i {~ ~ ~ 1 ' lfl~ I' j ~ X ~ ~...~ i it r•, •-~ '.. 1 ,, -r , ^~ rz~l ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ i,~ -~ ..i ~.... ,.,~..., ~,.,. ~x WrJ(1~r.15 ~ ; ( ~ .. ~;,, i i M~~.. ~ t E } a ~,~ ~ ~, ._ ~ ' x _ ~....___.._____..___. _..._ .._....._..__..___. __ ... _.._.......; I 1 ..V L.. _ .. _ .... .. _..._ I ~~ ~ _. E..... i_w c~ I ~. ~~ ~ i r~ l ~.r~ : , _~ .. __..._.. __._-_. ______..______..._.._ ..___.._....____........ _~._ ~_. ~.._._...___-___. ~ 1 x ... --_~ ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ ..._.,...... x ~4' FENCE X _..___... x .w,......_.. ~ .._...... X . x ..__.._. x x ~'. GRASS x ~., -rt__.... .__ _..__..._....__..___.........~. _..___.____._ _...._..____.._......._, t n+~ ~+^~~vaI-ICK.~CYR,MMrfK,~R~YfIMR'~Mtl/K01/M'+Y ~ t ~ ' yY'w• O EE ~ ;. ~ plllnflllr' ! ih~ ~ !•w ~ ~ .~ ~~ r ' t t N ~ rI' trr,~j~ ,r'i ~i rq 1~1 ~ r~ i- X ''" l,„ _~ U r i r..l x ~.{ ii ~ . ~ ~o `~ ~n T ~ ~ t~ t) z ~ ~``~ '.c~j ~r-ia I ?; ~ ,'1 ° ~~ I I u ~" ' liE _t ~ ~ ' 7 _. ~ {t : z p J.. r 3, r m ;1 ~ tl •4jy rU 7~ - E ..{ w ;n ~ ~ ..1 ~ r ~ ~ rn ~ ~> [~Cl ;z~ xc ";;~` ' ~ `r' t~ ~+ ~' i ; iJ~ t'~ to~;~;I~ ~ ~t~~ ~jr t E I 1-'~ ~~ n -, ~ ~ (a r ~t :~ A 7a- ("SEs~S 5~r~~F i I `::; .TJ ,, Iri . ,. _.. „ . ,. ~. ... r, ~ ~ r, '.Ar fr 61 ~~~~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~ is ~`` ~~ ~ ~r a< I .~..~~f 7 i : •1• ~ , Y -1 t ~ t, z ...d t,~ _.~ {a _ ,._ __..~..._~ ...... _ . _ tr ~ ~ tl~ k ~ ~ l ~ _ _ .... _ . __.__. ___.. _._,.... ..._ ....._ __. _ .._~. r __ ___ __._.-,..._... r~ ~ ~ ~~~;~~ _..... i~ .~ t ~ i` i ,. - i~ l ~ i I r R ~ ;~ I i i ~ I !~ rd ~ ~' ~, ~ W ~>x~;~ 1 „~ Q ~. a ,~ ~~~~`SF__ _:~ ~ w~j ~~~~' ~' .. ~~ _:a ti r~.~ ~.. .; ~.,. ~ I~ ;~ ~4 ~ ~ •~ I~ ~!~ ~ BOLLARD DETIAL PAVING A4 SALE: ,,z• _ ,'-o" PLAN 180'-4" (E) ROOF LINE BEYOND ~~~^ .~ (E) PAINTED CMU BLOCK '~~ COLOR: light tan .' `. ~' ~~ ~ ,C .~ ,. .~ 5116' PETAL CATS 18 6l "t' D® CDRRUCAh71 V_ SLANG OR ED. WELDED wctt sim nauE, ro ;H FAINDING CDLAR C. APRDH PAD D: W W Z_ (7 ~~~, ri ~ i ivi v Z SCALE: 1/4' ~ 1'-0' W J U 3 TRASH ENCLOSURE SCALE: AS-SHOWN ~ A4 ~ J W Q a w 0 rn a U ~ M Om ~ ~ zI Q ~ N ~ N ~„ 0 >v ~~ Y a Q N Q Q U O ~ LL Z J I- Q ~ ~ ~ w w D.. ~ Vl ~ U W ~ z ~ t~ - J Z (/~ m _O F- Y Q W ~ m L>J W ~ J U W Z ~ z W _o - ~ ~ W ~ ~ x LLJ ,n w nn ~ ~L ~ Q7 U ~ ~ NEW 3070 EXIT DOORS AT NEW (E)10'X10' ROLL-UP DOOR ~ ~ (E) 3D70 PAIR DOORS TO REMAIN ~ (E) 407D PAIR DOORS TO REMAIN ' "KIDDY ACADEMY" DAY CARE TO REMAIN -SEE NOTE -SEE NOTE -SEE NOTE NOTE: REAR ELEVATION EXISTING OPENINGS WILL CHANGE PER FUTURE Z TENANT NEEDS PER PLAN SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL DATED 01-22-2008 A 4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2" S0. METAL RECESSED TUBE COLOR: brown 2" S0. METAL RECESSED TUBE COLOR: brown E)) CEMENT PLASTER k t ~OLDR d (E) CEMENT PLASTER COLOR: dark tan or an : (E) CEMENT PIASTER COLOR: dark tan (E) CEMENT PLASTER COLOR: dark tan (E) FOAM TRIM COLOR: ligth tan DD \ (E) HALF-ROUND TRIM COLOR: li ht tan 9 ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ' I ' ` ~ ; I / ! '~- ~ ~ I '' ` L I i ~ ~i~ ~'f ~i.-.'~.i... .viii. rl-.. -4,-.I. . '...~. ..L!4 ' ~ i .~.{ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~. !Y. "Y iii-. ii i~ I ~~~ {.Y!~i. -.H~_I. !+ ~4 .rfl'- ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ (E) CEMENT PLASTER (E) 6" TILE ((E)) CEMENT PLASTER CCOOLOR: ligth tan COLOR: mexicon/tan COLOR: l; th ton 9 NEW 3070 PAIR OF STORE FRONT DOORS TO BE INSTALLED AND LOCATED AT EXISTING STORE FRONT WINDOWS. ALL FUTURE STORE FRONT DOCRS & WINDOWS MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON TENANT NEEDS, ALSO SEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DATED 01-22-2008 (E) FOAM TRIM COLOR: dark tan ~~ i ~ i i ~ i ~ i (E) 3070 PAIR OF STORE (E) 5" TILE FRONT DOORS COLOR: mexicon/tan (E) CEMENT PLASTER COLOR: dork Tan f 0 ~~ I '~ ~ I - ~ i (E) CEMENT PLASTER COLOR: Ilgth tan (E) 3070 PAIR OF STORE FRONT DOORS AT "KIDDY ACADEMY" DAY CARE DATE: 09-30-09 FRONT ELEVATION SGALE: AS S~~DWN 1 AL~ SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-D" DRAWN: JA'rl JOB: CUPERTINO OF 8 SHEETS N N CJ1 ~~.miA A m A~~f~ ~~oZm mZ ~ ------------- 4 4 STE1/ENS CREEK BL1/D. -----~ I 1 I I I 1 ' ~i ~ ~N N ' I JJ I I N ~ ~ A i ~~ -~~~ 01 ~ z / j ~ `\ ~ II I 1 1 I I L x I 101 I f m ; 1 ~ l! ~ ~\\ i I % J ~ t -II~~~ .r 1 i ~/ 1 I \\\ i I i I \` I I ~ 1 I ip 1 I ~ I I I ~~ I ~ i ~\ I I ~~~ 1--r 1 ~' ~~. I ~ ~ 1 I ` ~ I I 1 ~ i 01 I 1 \~ 1 1 i `~~ I I ~i I~~i~ II I '.~-1, \ ~ ~ I I I , Y I \\ ~I ~ ~ 1 ~~ .101 I I c~ 1` i 1 ~ 'I ~ a u~~~~~~"~ g~~~+~°wNu -~ - ~ D ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ x ~ D n T ~ t ~'~ ~ A ~ ~~ _ _ ~ ~D~ ~ ~ p '~ - ~ ~a _ u - ~ ~ D ~w n d w ~-~ '~ ~ ~w ~~ ~ (fl ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ >~ 3 ~ m F ~~~ L a ~ ~ z ~~~ N1~ V ~ V ~~ ' "~ ' ' U RUB i i I ! ~ -u-NUm u~ Z i2 bbb~ $ ~ , b ~~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' i~ ~ (A (P fP O~ ~~ v ~ I A ~ I'~~~ I I U-~-. . 1 1 ~~ ~' I I ` ~ I I ` li0 II\ I I i ~ Z y m I r.. 'I I Amp F ~~ I i ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .I 1 ~ A~~i-1 m A A 1 II I 11 m~~~ 1 p l 1 '~~~ II I~ ~ ~ ~ A I ~~~ I ~,~ ~~ ~ I ,~~' ; ~. ~ 1 I ~ II I ~ I 1 ~ iip ~ I I I I ~\\\ I I I ~~~~~~~ I I 'I I ~~~-T ~, ;' ~i ' ~~ I I 1 1 I , 1 I , I II I I I ~ I , I I `~~~I ~ ~, ~ I I i~/ +~~~ /~~ I I ~, / ~ I I I 1 ICI I I I I 1 1~ I I ~ ~ I I ~~ it ~~/ 7~ i ~~ I ~` ~_ ~~ I `~ I I I ~ III Oi 11 1 I~ I I ~~ I I j ~ N `~~J_ I ~i/ j T~ I ~ ~ ,I I 1 ~ I I 1 I I I 1 j I t I j I i --F~~/ I to I N ! I q I I li.~~ F ~ ° CUPERTI~10 BUSINESS PLAZA r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PATEL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ~ ~ 19875 STEVENS CREEK BLVD., CUPERTINO, CA 461 PARK AVE. /SAN J05E CA. 95110 ~ 1 A O O (408) 288-5935 vl o Z o LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Q a W W U W W H ~. urci~iii~ i~luuy nu^uc~uY cu..c~. .. v..~~iuc~~v.. .,.....t.....1 Lighting Systems 2322 6th Street Berkeley, CA 94710 Calcs by: Cain Boulden Voice: 510-982-3937 Fax:510-704-9568 cainb@ltgsys.com 10/15/2009 Filename: cupertinoKiddyAcademyH_10-15-09.AGI 1. THIS LIGHTING DESIGN IS BASED ON LIMITED INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS TO LIGHTING SYSTEMS, INC. SITE DETAILS PROVIDED HEREON ARE REPRODUCED ONLY AS A VISUALIZATION AID. FIELD DEVIATIONS MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT PREDICTED PERFORMANCE. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, CRITICAL SITE INFORMATION (POLE LOCATIONS, ORIENTATION, MOUNTING HEIGHT, ETC.} SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SPECIFIER RESPONSIBLE FDR TriE PROJECT. 2. LUMINAIRE DATA IS TESTED TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. OPERATING VOLTAGE AND NORMAL MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES OF LAMP, BALLAST, AND LUMINAIRE MAY AFFECT FIELD RESULTS. 3. CONFORMANCE TO FACILITY CODE AND OTHER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER ANO/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. U PLAN Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Description Lumens LLF Filename } 6 PGM150P-x2x HUBBELL PGM150P-x2x 12900 0.558 PGM175H-x2x.IES _ '~ 10 wp9s3-15k " KIM Warp9 WP9S3 LED-5100K -1 0.855 wp9s3-15k.ies 7 wp9s5-15k KIM Warp9 WP9S5 LED-5100K -1 0.855 wp9s5-15k.ies Calcination S Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Parking Illuminance Fc 1.05 2.7 0.3 3.50 9.00 ~ o U N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ L Q) m -~' - ~ -~--~ ~ ~--~ N N N Q N Q Q U O Z U W z~ _J ~m Y W W U 0 ~ Z zW _> z ~' W ~ r` U Z z I C~ J W ~- DATE' NOV, 2009 SCALE. AS SHOWN DRAWN: --- JOB: --- OF 7 SHEETS l G. O ... I r ~; i .. .'wr. - ' r %ti: w.' ' ., ' 'n y.. ' • ""• ~ '.t,...,nyl ~ ,:: ~ +~R>N' •~h~ -t , +. A _'.~ .-• 6 ~ cq G.0 / '.,L,L''3 _ ~ { •I'` f ••~. wr~',V PL 'r I IJ O ~~ I ^'rw , L4.S _. i t E• • 111 I ~ t`' ! ~ J - , -; .c ~~ 01 ? _.. , . _ ; ' 1 I I E' 'j •` _.. _ .._ ~~ - 1 t:g, r ~ ,I ' rldr, ll~ 114 1 t:.b d0•l `D.s r ~ ~~. bC.~4,~tc •fol ,~ r ' ` .., al'~Q.~ `` ~ i ~,~. L 2,u.; 11~9xy4~' •.; ( t1~V1114d1 ti • I l p • - - f - ^-- / _ ..,'tip , ~, ICI/ I ' . • I •'-- -- n 1 , ,, ' ' " " .. _ ......_.__ . ~.~_._.._. .._1._ _. r; I -•- - - • , is N 1 ~ P I .,~ .. ~; ~^ S '{ ~ R ~ oG ~ \ ~ •I '~ _.. •~ R ._..___... ~i •l~ ~~• 1 t ' r. .~ ,y e Q a r d / Q ci ~ '~ ~ ' I ~ ~'.. IN. LCXa2 ElE+!. 197.5 JI t,c ~ Z ~ _ __ _ ------- ~ 1 r ~ , . ~ I. ~ y.. I' r "V . q t'. ll U 3 tJ U U ~• 1 ~ nl ,1 •~• I •,'__ U ~ ~ 1r a I ~ -.. - , I ~ ,! ~i 0 _ ~ h ` • , I~ ~ d ~ . __ _ • - /~ I r h , . _- ~~ ,l7 1 c.>5. I t ~ ~ of ~ I,< rDr - - fz' ~' ~ Q0'o/ ~ rYpl • •/Tn r 1NV. i12•L I e 1 ~' (1 1' -w• al t•, t n / d I I V I • t '~' RIM 1r~f ~ /' . t , ,' '•~• i01•C~ X01. 01• 25'•tJ 201-pn. --LD1. O" 261.0„~ ~• ~ ~ % •/ 1, 1 r ( • . ,1 .. e; • e ~ , / d s bAU ITAIG1f tin ER r rv r.o sla ! r r ds 7 E• ~ Y" ~'` Co t / r 1 • \~ I ~/• \ ~ / ~ _I C .~rr.l. j / -, i ` ;" 1 ~ s ~, P I~ 1191 I J ~ ~ .~ ., .. - • ~ • ..q•i7~ C' Pr 'a • r , ; PLAt/Y ING V I t, :r J7L~,..,,• ! 1, alrAl M014 ~ .O ID ~ •- I ,. - •'-~ ~ ,•-CA t~.tovcA. ~' to ~ + a~I~Pt 1+"•751^i~~.l' JSa~01`~'1HV,l1L,l __~ ~ 105~•~R.C•?~ 3•'001 .G QIM•197.oG I _ ~ •" tN+<1192.3 ,l•j1r.95 ~ , I'{ i,l _ I Il . •-INV1 19'1,5 C I r' + ' • I_ a .,,r ri is i • t p 1 I 1 ' ~ , I I d t01 , 7 •+ • ~ f b5 U /¢0' 0 •~7t1_ Q I I p1 I 1 t I I I I 1 e 1?31'r.4 140 1 ~ 75 45 •o ~ P~q P D Dy t ~r1hC~7 G6PICATI~,1N , "~':':~t':::~ .~QE~. PAnICING AGGSi.~,s t7RIVE.1V,t~4' hAR1~1N6 t . ' d•~ o t*I'C M ' •. , _t ~•F J.: •. : ti ;~' Lo,,P• :~_I; I;nr,~ 12'I A c PAVING cStJ ZI1 Q •G P A V I N c5 ON ~O" CAhP, tJAJTE 121, A/C FA V ItJ G ON I G CD1w, %A/iE [a P P7A r 0„T„,~~;~ 7q~Tlal. P~KKIN G• 11•G Cb,(L~ FREITAS CONSTRUCTION CO. ~~ 1 ,.... a_ .~, ..,. ' ( , •. ••IMN•,f • ~M1L Iltwn yF•M1 1.:. • hr ,l .. t _ t , • • w fi4• +C • . f .; .e ~ i v. F.)•f., v:a •. .. :, '.t y.V f.~ •t It:•r.n.•.3•i,a.:l, r~ ~. r ~ ' I : ~ y r.• . a ~ t ,thL ... ~•r•~ yl ,~ gitr• ~:: r n. r. I 1 al r 3:•0., - ~ N.'. , ...-. _ l . _.... .;1..~ `1.• ~C;jN~. ~'~~~'. 'E1~~ i~~ _. _. _ I II I o ~.. _ .. ...... • GALE 2 I~tJ _ 'e, _ ,. ' • G¢ADING ,EJATUfR'• • ~,v1CNC}1./ti4R•;,18••A •} ON THE' cd'iCH DAylr., oN TAG 3DUTH• • ~,~~r1D6 o•F•~STE:YEN?,•,_,a.E~k:hLUb NE1+fL..PJ~wD~'LAnt,6 AND oCPDyITe< •cvPE:RTIN,u • ', ., LO/f1~1l,Ei2 ,C.Oa••c1-EVr4Z•i0N•15'Z09,.Gq• CI?Y oF; GvpElt•itNO DA-fVJh,, . • ,land 16e1 ~ urdt lawn U H vadtr niL MT~ r r a1T tpnNtder4 1 aVi .k, xe IuenHd le u.t'•nr td :'Slit i21 41 tM~ , ro ~,,ee" in ANS GHEC 0 eY P1- f7 1? / G' oa o~ ~ '• , 1'i r AaSE ~ cc c ~• ~: y,Y r.. •' ~~~~ pPPRO o EDcltt of iK ff.Cec;MGE Rd n D.Gjry1 CES curENTwo tppli ! ELITE 5:1J1 rsce•,a`~ VU k `i...l Y{ I•:1 t If-' T t.rl7:rt ht ~e srr Cep. ~': •II•, rrr:nt t I I' t+r, ; a t• it i4 DIA15: i :: , a tr.N d tYf ~ V ~' 1'•"•t .1 Svt L' CHECKED ANO AP?ROVED FOR cDNFOFih1.iNC •wt ~ u FD Du 1~ IURK C; McFFRLAND, JA. U _~ .~ ~, W !!.~ ', U ~` 1 I ~ , I U.~ ~ I- ' •~ I ~ ,. I ~ ,~ I tt , h I ~ 11 r rly r I I , rJ , ~~u I 1 ;~'~ •~l I 1 I ~ I ~ r PoRTAt aV E• ~ ~ ~ ~LA'TS 2 +~ 3 u L; ~ Ir • +~ou~a vltiTa w tiugnlVl~lc~N J °~ 111 trLAN6Y A4A .,~ __.._.._,. -_,,.._. 1 ,. .., . _ .. . I,• I 1 . _ J' .. ~ 'f W --•-•. ....1 ~ ...._.... 1r . ~ CItY of cvaERrlNO I 5172 CLEAMNCE i ~1F?ROVED '! J ~- C(•Y.~~G~1:... ( ~.. ,• _n I j ' + ~ ( i , OAT2 ~~... a t • . r L 5ARA1AfsA SUNIJYYALE liti• !t _..._..'at. I. i VICINITY II~1~,p ~•Z E L J~~i~'F• n ~Cf I L _ _ .. ::•. :,:,. ~ i ~ :'>. ~ ~~:,.. ~• , 1 . ~ . • l :A1A{EK:~",DA,1F.; ?8Y:`,; .~:~ D6GYIPTIOti' ' a n c 4n +: :1. _ ~• _ •'r.; ,~, • r,;. ~i.r: ~•- • ('. • .~~ I J.,.:.(. '~ •;.y. .~:a• f o,...~. :yu c, .,i,., . Stole_ ~ • . .,,•: '•1• •i1' ;'.a:.••.^':'?~~~~'.1~+:• '~ • /x,1 •rr iii •,t, _ .~. . . ~ , ~~~ '~> 5 E ~ V~ ~ • : ' A : ~ C 11FOitN1 ^dttt^ S^i, J^t^ A A M , . . . i i•/. _ i ,~ l I ,~... , F, r~q: "r,~~`F'. ~j •;tyr.. ,~ ;t: ~:`, 1r;, .:,,; '.f `.. ; `r. t.: .I .. T. . ~'' ~• .• , ... ,_ •_rA.. ,a :'.~, I. <. `,4+` ,. 'y `. ... i, .... 1 is ~, .;'n^' , : .. ~, , l~y 1.11 .. ._. ., .. . , .., .. . ... ... _ . :r'71 ~,4. I~. .-.~ - - •yrAI.E _ I-o GRfb.t~iNG At.ID PaviNG~Io;GS. 1rU1COtht3<, fOViJDATIDN4."I'Rtth AND ALL DLt71i-I~ SPnLI %E ¢cawuE~ ft~7HT+cyl?E. TQCb RoOT+I hH•aLL PtE 2E;J~aV,:~ Ta 4 a,NIIIUN DEPTH cP 2 FEttT• ToP Son. 5}PALL hE REiJ,avzn To A DEpTK of G INC.-+cK Suy~y.oE BEFALL 17tS eaclRtPtL'n Tu /. gGrTH oP Co WCHt•4 ANO togy'gc7ED Ta q .. _„ RELA'iIVC ~/nPAGTfON OF q0~^ Ay DE76RJnINt'D DNOE2 .47ANRA(ZO yPECIp,CA•rtONy. "•'~'~•;;i;=, •• •'••' •• ," •~.~i?t£ hahE hHALL GoNgIhT Op C,RU4Hfd lLnuc OR GfV+VEL, Co4FOr.+~IWGTrJ GL4y5 2 -;;{..?, ::'-- ~ n', ~ • , , ...,yl.~.cf 9EGTtol.t ZCr . 'fe 6 PiAhE CFUR4E SN,o•LL NE CmYy(rALTLI7 rd A RELAT+Vm a y h Cst`[~J ' IXING ANC Pl•AGING C>F AyPIlA4? CONCR,ETG rr'I~LL CONPORA~ TO 1'~'1tE ~ OP N I ~ NOY'EI 2 Existing asnitar9 "~~ ecTront ~~• , s ' • :"1' _ --•• ~ e •' *d, cr"Ir, ~l ~ - aterale for this Droperty. dt the present time came only H6 DauPrLt: SEAL eeaT 4ii-ALL eONpor/n 'Tv =rrrc'rrnV 37 . I"aR 4 t i ? - r g1.,•ol•.Ili• _ •, tij ` • to the existing property line, ' lNOUh SE .Lb . +TU~• ?Ui ioP hDIL td ~ : i:;. •• • ' •• .,.-•~- o The x111 be dedicatin lL1 '~ ~,fG PACING , Yh S At t t ti t t - v a E ,gyATEat.~L AI.I ~ DuGIVG ~F RE1N{'tlRCL'A ..On1cRE7E DRAtN PIE 5•H LL I'IAN7E2 •,. - •'- • ~ ~ ' ' - ~ a me, con rac or ;rill "have to rlm acditional 151 ling. " ~ N O[ZTy , O 7ECTTON Cry . F CIN3 TEi'EIAL •aJD PL/ 7NE / • ` ' - U+r.1G ~;1R~i ~ •, .' .: • _~ bo inside of a1d^vrssli:, :mere ~ C.oV,PI Phht clean-wts x111 be installac. , M ,E~VEfC PIPE bHt,t.L 8E CLAY yE~VE>R. PIPE , NITAR ( iANITAIZY ~,E\vER 9{},1LL CoI:1Fo2tA T>3hEG~•ION 71. 6ACIC FILL 4f TREIJC,;•E'c, • `~ Per WA1r~ee 4-14-04 A•-L iaE IJ;F: NA}ylCnuY ca,nPhG7r:rD, ,1 n ` . o z TOH hA51NS ;SH:E.LL PJE OF PDriTLArtn :~~ wIJCR~r w1-~•G1 224 r 2_ . .. Ai CahT IRa>' GR/iiFl+ ANO 4HALL cONF4Nti, ;O APPLICA3 Ln YOR.~'IDtJy OF • Grp, . -,..u; ~~,,. , . I~~~~;.~.~- h [: L71 o N ~ I . . . _ .. .. ~ - •-'' r'' -•r „?r`. ',,1~*1 -t''f~•'T'~'~''•%r~~•~n-t ,. .E.I+PJOVE E rONy RE E2 TO yEG nth o' .T E STATE o CC.L1FoRN1A , I ' ''~~• I. ~ ~• ,ar,•,'••~.-• 2 i,.,. TN h CT, f 'rlD F H 1= ~~NC., ..~~~~I~ ~ C.~, t_.+JI~ _~ T31;,~~UY.:..S.f.ui~:.. ,>l _ ~ .::n;:l~i~„at::•=.iC, ~ TnETJ.T• ~0 Pl1 JLIC tvO C /tNOAQ.() PE;CI I~A"IIaJNh OF .~ANf 1FIG0 htAE.ts Ali' = 11-0" .. - __ DEP n. f r r~.5 ~r 5• F , ' n "• Attachment 3 Application: USE PERMIT (U-2009-09) to allow an 8,400 square foot daycare facility to operate at an existing commercial building. The application also includes a new outdoor play area in the existing rear parking lot. Applicant/Owner: Ci1dy Cheng Property Location: 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard Site Improvement List Pam Front Parking Area The front parking lot is a one-way parking aisle with existing tree wells. The applicant is providing the following improvements: • Upgradu1g the existing tree wells to landscape planters • Adjusting existing parking stalls to 8.5 feet by 18 feet to allow for larger landscape planters • Providing six (6) new bike racks The applicant is also reserving seven (7) parking stalls for parent drop-off/pick-up for the daycare, located immediately in front of the daycare entrance. Rear Parkilag Lot The parking lot at the rear of the site is in poor condition and the project proposes to improve it as follows: • New striping for 93 stalls (Minimum 89 stalls required per Parking Ordinance) • Resurfacing and repairing existing asphalt with new asphalt overlay • Pervious pavers for the northerly perimeter parking spaces • Anew swale at northerly perimeter • Landscape planters in the parking lot and perimeter landscaping planters with 18-inch curb cuts for drainage. • New wheel stops along west side of play area • New trash enclosure • New parking lot lighting Landscaping The applicant is providu1g 8,128 square feet of landscape area, 1,840 square feet at the front of the lot, and 6,288 square feet at the rear parking area of the lot. The following ne~v landscaping enhancements are proposed: Front Parking Area • Modify existing tree wells to landscape planters Rear Parki~zg Area • New bio-swales along the entire northerly perimeter of the site 1 2-28 • Curbless landscape strip at the west perimeter of the play area to allow for storm water collection • New landscape planters with 18-inch curb cuts in the parking area to allow for storm water collection • New landscape planters along the north perimeter of the play area • New shrubs along the east perimeter of the play area (not shown on plans and have already been planted by the applicant after the plan submittal) LiLi l~~ Nett' lighting fixtures are proposed throughout the parking lot. A photometric study has been provided confirming the following measures: • Light fixtures are oriented to minimize light and direct glare to adjacent residential properties • All parking lot area, sidewalks, and pedestrian accessible areas are sufficient illumilated • 17 luminaries out of 23 are proposed to be energy efficient Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 2 2-29 Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM INTRAOFFICE CORRESPONDENCE CUPERTINO DATE: January 21, 2010 TO: Leslie Gross, Planning FROM: Chad Mosley, Public Works SUBJECT: 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd -Kiddie Academy The 10,000-square-foot-minimum-area-of-disturbance threshold for triggering the application of C3 stormwater management requirements is not met under the description of the project currently given by the applicant. It is worth noting, however, that a large portion of the existing paving on the site appears to be either in poor condition or to be insubstantial structurally. Were rehabilitation of this portion of pavement to be part of the project description, the C3 area-of-disturbance threshold would almost certainly be crossed, and applicable stormwater management requirements pertain in conditioning the project. Although it might be desirable to rehabilitate this portion of the existing paving, Public Works cannot require that such rehabilitation be part of the project. We request, however, that the applicant provide a pavement plan that shows the extent of pavement repairs and pavement replacement (as referenced in key note 24, on sheet A-1). This plan would locate areas of new andlor replaced pavement (asphalt and concrete), and would also provide square footage quantities for these areas. 2-30 Attachment 5 Environmental Consulting Services 18488 Prospect Road -Suite 1, Saratoga, CA 95070 Phone: (408) 257-1045 stanshell99(a.toast.net FAX: (408) 257-7235 November 3, 2008 _ _____ Mr. Mahesh Patel _ Patel Structural Engineers 461 Park Avenue -Suite 1 San Jose, CA 95110 RE: Noise Impact and Mitigation Study for new Kiddie Academy daycare center, 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd, Cupertino Dear Mr. Patel, In response to your request I have evaluated the potential noise impacts that could be produced on nearby sensitive receptors by the proposed redevelopment of a portion of the building at 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd. in Cupertino. The report discusses the present environment, the proposed project and its associated noise-related aspects, the potential new activities and operational noise impacts on the nearest receptors in the area, and compliance with Cupertino noise guidelines. To summarize the conclusions of the report, the proposed changes to the project site, building and new activities would be expected to meet the City Noise Ordinance and not produce any significant noise incidents on the site. Project Description [1] [2] The Kiddie Academy of Cupertino proposes to provide weekday daytime care for infant through elementary-age kids on the subject site. Kiddie Academy proposes to create a new Cupertino daycare facility by redeveloping 8,400 square feet of the existing 25,200 square foot former retail furniture building at the subject address in Cupertino and constructing outdoor facilities for play activities behind the building. The property is zoned for commercial and school-type uses. Internal modifications would be made to the building for Kiddie Academy use, as well as constructing a 6,240 square foot playground area in back of the building and paved parking for 25 vehicles in front and 68 vehicles in back. The facility would accommodate a maximum of 143 kids with a staff of 15, on a normal workday schedule of hours. No evening, major holiday or weekend activities would be held on site. Inside activities would include normal school educational, creative and play activities in 8-10specially-designed rooms. Three distinctive outdoor play areas would be constructed for infants/toddlers, preschoolers, and school-age kids, with appropriate climbing structures and play areas for each group. During outdoor play periods there would be at least one staff person for every 6 infants/todd{ers, and one staff for every 12 preschool and older kids. Sensitive Receptor F:ocations The project area is a mixed residential and commercial neighborhood on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard west of Portal Avenue. The nearest sensitive receptor locations for noise generated by the project includes a row of residences a{ong the north property line and a medical of ice building adjacent to the property on the east side. There are also other potential receptors in the vicinity, such as an office center on the adjacent property to the west, and a fast food restaurant adjacent to the site to the east behind a high concrete block wall, which are not considered sensitive receptors because of intervening distance and structural protection. There would also be other tenants sharing the building at some point, which represent additional potential sensitive receptors. Vehicle access to the project ~~~~ould be from Stevens Creek Boulevard as at present, and a nel~r access route into the rear of the site 1~Iould be opened from Portalvenue on 'the past side. Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga 2-31 Kiddie Academy Project Noise Study -Cupertino Page 2 of 4 This study investigates the extent to which the adjacent receptors could be impacted by noise from Kiddie Academy activities. The various potential noise impacts are discussed in the following sections. Ambient Noise Levels and Noise Sources in the Area The primary source of ambient noise at the project site is traffic on Stevens Creek Boulevard, a major arterial bounding the project site on the south side. Typical vehicle passby noise levels are in the 50-60 dBA range at 100 feet. Trucks, buses, motorcycles, and poorly-muffled vehicles produce peak levels 5 to 15 dBA higher on passby. Noise is contributed to a lesser extent by sporadic vehicles on Portal Avenue. Large and small aircraft and helicopter overflights create infrequent noise incidents of 55 to 65 dBA. Delivery of products by large diesel trucks to support retail activities in other portions of the building and on - - - --- both sides of~Portal7wenue adjacent-to the site create noise levels of~65=70-dBA at-100-feet from~eriods-of engine idling while unloading. Background ambient noise levels are established by high volume and high speed vehicles on 4-280 one block to the north. Other than typical sporadic neighborhood lawn care and garbage pickup activities, there are no other notable noise sources in the project area. Field noise measurements were made during the midday period of October 24, 2008 with a CEL-440 Precision Noise Meter and Analyzer, calibrated with a B & K Model 4230 Sound Level Calibrator. Measurement locations were chosen to represent the site and key receptor locations, as described below: • Location 1 -parking lot adjacent to the open field at the back of the site, between the medical office building and the corner residence on Portal Avenue, 100 feet from the Portal traffic • Location 2 - at the northwest comer of the property, near the residences behind Noise levels were measured and are reported using percentile noise descriptors, as follows: L90 (the background noise level exceeded 90 °!o of the time), L50 (the median noise level exceeded 50% of the time), L1 (the peak level exceeded 1 % of the time), and Leq (the average energy-equivalent noise level). Measured noise levels are presented in Exhibit 1 below. The DNLILdn noise levels were computed as the long-term average of the Leq using the daily traffic distribution in the area, with standard weighted penalties for the nighttime hours, and modeled with an enhanced version of the National Cooperative Highway Research Board traffic noise model [4]. EXHIBIT 1 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS (dBA) Proposed Kiddie Academy project area, Stevens Greek Boulevard, Cupertino Location Lg0 L50 Leq L1 Ldn 1. east property fine behind building 44 46 51 62 55 2, northwest corner of site 43 45 46 53 50 Traffic is the dominant noise source near the project site, so noise levels at any location depend upon volume, speed and distance to the nearest traffic, and the Exhibit 1 monitored levels indicate those relationships. At location 1, Portal traffic is the dominant noise, even though volume and speeds are low, At location 2, the distance is significantly larger (Stevens Creek Blvd.), but volume and speeds are higher. At both locations the Lgp background naise level is a result of the moderate-volume traffic on {-280 one block north. During morning and evening periods when temperatures are Power and humidity higher, noise is transmitted more efficiently, and noise levels from 1-280 are or`ten higher by 5-10 dB. k~efevant C€~pertir~o hloise Grdirtance Limits ~3~ Section 10.48.040 of the Cupertino Noise Ordinance applies to this project, which limits naise during daytime hours (7 am to 8 pm) produced by sources adjacent to a residential property to 60 dBA, ar by sources adjacent to commercial propert,~ to 65 dBA. Dote that there are no activities during night time periods associated ~~~rh the project, vE~hen City noise limits are more restrictive. In Addition, brief da~~time noise incidents on the site ~~~ould be allowed somewhat hither noise levels b~~ Ordinance section 10.48.050. Environm~ntGl Consulting Ser~.%ic:.s Saratcga 2-32 Kiddie Academy Project Noise Study -Cupertino Page 3 of 4 For example, noise incidents that last less than 15 minutes during any two hour period are allowed to be 5 dB higher than long-term general limits. Potential Kiddie Academy Noise Impacts Outdoor playground activities behind bfJiiding All outdoor potentially noisy activities would occur behind the building and adjacent to the east property fine on three distinct playground areas (a 900 square foot area for infants/toddlers, a 3000 square foot area for preschoolers, and a 2100 square foot area for after-school activities by school age kids). The _ _ __ ___. ___potential_noise_impacts_from_outdoor_activities_are_described in the folfowina_paragraphs: _ Outdoor kids' activities would include climbing on play structures, tricycle riding, games with balls and other typical outdoor games. Almost all of the noise would be from sporadic voices of kids and staff. Kids have two outdoor play periods of 45 minutes each day. During school hours there would be a maximum of 36 toddlers and preschool kids at a time playing outside. After about 3 pm a group of school age kids, as many as 28 at a time, would also have outdoor play time. Activities of this type can create intermittent brief noise from kids' and staff voices of 50 to 60 dBA at a distance of 30-40 feet. The adjacent medical office building has large sealed windows facing the playground area and is set back i 5 feet from property line. Typica{ outdoor noise levels at the medical office building from playground voices would be in the 50 - 60 dBA level, below City ordinance limits, and there are no outdoor use areas associated with the building that wou{d be exposed to the playground noise. Ensile the medical ofFces playground noise levels could be in the 30-40 dBA range, considerably below normal office and HVAC noise. There are four residences along the back property line closest to the project, 75 to 125 feet from the playground, so noise maximum playground noise levels would be in the 40 to 50 dBA range, in the range of ambient traffic noise and much below the City noise ordinance limits. The residences have wooden fences on the property line, offering 4-7 dBA reduction of project noise. There are also parking spaces 25-40 feet from the property line, which could produce brief incidents of 50-60 dBA during the day. Activities Ensile the building Potential noise impacts from Kiddie Academy activities inside the building, such as reading, art, music, and other classroom-type activities would be negligible because of noise attenuation by the high- quality party wails dividing the tenant spaces within the building. With proper construction of dividing walls, noise transmission through walls would be reduced 40-50 dBA, so there would be no significant noise generation from this activity on other tenants. The anticipated noise levels for key locations are shown in Exhibit 3. EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT NOISE LEVELS (dBA ) Kiddie Academy -Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Location Max Noise Levels 1. outside -medical office building adjacent to 55-60 east property line 2. inside -medical ofrce building 30-40 3. outside -residential yards along north 50-55 property line 4. inside project building -adjacent ~ 25-35 ~ commercial spaces i=r~~,rironi,~ental Consulting ~c~'dICcS Saratoga 2-33 Kiddie Academy Project Noise Study -Cupertino Page 4 of 4 Conclusions and Summary Overall ambient noise levels in the project area now depend primarily on traffic noise, and this will continue to be the dominant noise source in the area in the foreseeable future, Because the full outdoor play area is 6000 square feet, activities and noise incidents would be widely distributed over a large area. The primary noticeable noise would be intermittent and brief voice incidents. With the type of activities, the number of kids and the distances involved, these activities would be within the City noise ordinance limits, and would not be expected to create any noise impacts in adjacent areas. If I may be of further assistance on this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, H. Stanton Shelly Acoustical Consultant Baard Certified Member (1982) Institute of Noise Control Engineering REFERENCES 1. Project Drawings: Cupertino Business Plaza, 19875 Stevens Creek Blvd, Cupertino, A-1, A-2, L-1; Patel Structural Engineers, San Jose, Revised 10-9-08. 2. Operational information sheet and facility activity description for Kiddie Academy of Cupertino, Child Care Learning Centers, October 22, 2008. 3. Noise Ordinance, Municipal Code Section 10.48, Noise levels for residential and commercial zones; City of Cupertino; 199 4. Highway Noise - A Design Guide for Highway Engineers, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 117, Highway Research Board, Nationa{ Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1971 (model enhanced and Held validated by ECS). Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga 2-34 FsR4i'~tJ~ED KIDDIE A~IDEMYt~ ~F ~UF'EF~Tl~1C~ ~~~,~~ ~~ ~~~.~~ Attachment 6 ~Gf~E3~1" ~~, ~~i7$ Da~+ ! , cif aperati~n: Hoy ~ ~ of appration: Hal ~l~y Ciasings: Sg~ ! ~r~ Fo~a'k~ge: Kiddie Academyte~ o~ Gu~ertina St$vens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA ~RERATI(~NAL INFORMATIOi~I N{anday thru Friday ~:~0 Afv1- 6:~g PM 8 Major Holidays 8,00 SF ~CCUF'AhiT CHART Roor' - Rge Students per Sta'~f Capacity Staff Administrafiive 1 ~ Infants 4 12 3 2 Toddlers 6 12 2 _ 2 Year Qids 12 g 1 _ ~ 2 Year 41ds 12 24 2 _ 4 ~ ~ Year Qlds 12 24 2 _ ~ W 4 Year Qlds 12 24 2 6 5 Year t~lds 12 12 1 7 Scho~f I~ B 14 2~ 2 lc~t~l!~ 143 15 ~ 2-35 CFFIl.E} Ckf~E •LEr~RMfNQ CEFITER$ t,~l,l1'D~~R PLAN AREA • Tots I playground square footage: 6,Q00 square feet • Ptay area divided into three separate play areas fr~r safety and age appropriateness. • Infai i ltaddfer area: 9Q0 square feet • Pre- ~ct~aa! play area: 3,000 square feet • Sch~Ql Age play area: 2,1 a0 square fee# ~ Chip rein will have outdoor play twice a day. ~utdc~ar play schedules will rotate in aGCOrr~ance with program scheduling {see f~etgw). InfantJTc~d ~t;er Playcround Schedule ___ • Tie l_~~es~k infentlfioddler groins•i~e at any_given timo wt~uErl k~e 92 children atlotuing_75 square feet ~~r_ __ -- child R+lornEng Age Group tnfants ~"oddiers Total Children 12 ~~ Time Schedule x:00 AM - 9:45 AM 9:45 AM - ~ 0:30 AM Afternoon Age Group Infants Toddlers Total Chlt~#ren 1~ 12 Time SGhetiu~e 2:15 - 3:00 pM 3:00 ~--- 3:45 PM Pre-Schao Play~tround achedule • The I argent pre-school grasp size at any given time woubd be 24 children allowing 125 square feet per child Morning Ag®Group 2 Year Qld$ 3 Year olds 4 Year Qlds 5 Year C71ds Afternoon Age Group 2 Year Olds 3 Year (Ids 4 Year Olds 5 Year tOlds Total Ghilctren 24 24 ~4 12 Tote{ Children 24 24 24 12 Time Schedule 9:00 At,~l - 9:45 AM 9:45 Alkyl -10:30 AM 10:3QAM-~11:15AM 11:15 AM-12:00 PM Tlme Schedule 1:30 -2:15 PM 2:15 - 3:OQ PM 3:a0 - 3:45 PM 3:45 - 4:3Q PM School A~-; t-laYeround Schedule The largest school age group size at any given time ~rould b® 23 children aliowirZg 75 square feet per chilrl lt~lcrning Age Group School Age TQiral Ghi!Idrer~ I'~lA !~f#ernc~r~n Age Group Tu~i Cis-lc~r~r~ ~cl~aol Age 25 2-36 Tirne Schedule I~IA~ s trn~ S~l~~t#u~~ 3:00 ~ 3:45 ECM