The URL can be used to link to this page

.02 U-2009-08 PW Market OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C1TY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENtiE • CUP�PTINO, CA 95014-3255 (40S) 777-3308 • I'AX (40S) 777-3333 • ��laiuun ��,�;cu}�ertino.or� CUPERTtNO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. G Agenda Date: Apri113, 2010 Application: U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08, EA-2009-11 Applicant/Owner: Ken Rodrigues/ FBJ Homestead Associates, LLC Property Location: 20580, 20620 and 20680 Homestead Rd APPLICATION SUMMARY Use Permit and Architectural and Site Approval to allow the demolition of 95,666 square feet of existing commercial space and the construction of 147,790 square feet of new commercial space arranged as four new commercial satellite Uuildings and three new major tenant spaces in an existing shopping center for a total of 203,792 square feet. The application also requests for approval of a 24-hour drive-through pharmacy and a second drive-through at one of the satellite Uuildings to operate from 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM. Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of up to 124 trees as part of tlle proposed development application. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends t11at the Planning Commission recommend approval of the following to the City Council: 1. Neg Dec, EA-2009-11 (Attacl 1- Initial Study & Attachment 2- Neg Dec) 2. Use Permit, U-2009-08 per the model resolution (Attachment 3). 3. Architectural & Site Approval, ASA-2009-08 per the model resolution (Attachment 4) 4. Tree Removal Permit, TR-2010-02 per the model resolution (Attaclunent 5) Project Data: General Plan Designation: Commercial/ Residential Zoning Designation: Planned General Commercial and General Commercial -rg [P(CG)/CG-rg] Specific Plan: N/A Acreage (Net): 15.029 acres (654,663 square feet) ' 2-1 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) April 13, 2010 Page 2 Building SF: Existing 153,000 square feet Proposed 203,792 square feet Building Height: 35 feet maximum Floor Area Ratio: 31.3% Parking: 3.98 spaces / 1000 square feet Proj ect Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Zoning: Yes Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt BACKGROUND The project site is located at 20580, 20630 & 20680 Homestead Road on the south west carner of Homestead Road and N. De Anza Boulevard. The site consists of an existing commercial shopping center located over three parcels that are adjacent to another small commercial strip center at the corner of Homestead and De Anza Blvd. and a Good Year Tire store to the east. The project is surrounded by a variety of uses including a hotel, a mini-storage facility, condos/townhomes, apartments and a new park under construction. Please see Figure 1 for details. ...�f I :: rs",!f ��_� r..=:�� : �:.i .♦ �-.-a. ,� i - , - T ' �, w y��` r � i a _ ' - ' t s. �If f � .4 '��`_'_ ^ i-. � ? . �'c' � X ` ' � ._,r.. ��....,� •.� � -s � �, _�'f � .�. .. - � "'+�,;�. _ -_ ,�. �3�� ` - � . , .. .' ' J� 'r" '� I � • �,�, - r�, .- _ .. .. �3�' ..+� ._ �"1.. �� y ��. I .,_. -_r.fl...�.. _..�.__._.�.r " ��c ,.�c � ; •7� �� °2 � � .� ,..f .. . . t . �� s « � . . ��' ._ _ - _,.-� �"� � � .. - ° 1 `-'�\' l7` ..v �;��v`��L.`. ^✓D-.if1E •�� -- i � ��y . � �� `� �. ... � �� I . t . . _ _�I�' R . ^Yi �7 .. � . �aY. .. � .� � ��, I i ,� �'r / � � �r� _ '�:T. . ' `,, ' ''- °''�� ,w� -..' � � _ } I %�� '� a1 �� , �'�` , !.�.�: � Ca � �r ' .� � �.,� '' f �.� ��.� .� � : � � � �_.� �. �� .. � �.... � ��- " _ _ - - . . ..�.� � .nM'.'.l.vsti:�' i. i.�'Rw � .� _.. � —. � w . . . �:t. �r+t..+�M ` .. . . . � + ��A � ' �I��i. ..._. � A .. _.. � �.�'�V�.��1 � '- ' ` pr. _ &. �8'0 �i qilaek • �� . ^. . w e -�. .c- s. r.k� � :�..c^ � '..�..�/R,..: ' ..--.�,,. �i...�w, 'r, jY . . �' w , �Je i �a - � �� "'w"'` � . "�� """ �,��` � Q - - "�:e� � �, + � � �► . � � ?, � .�" °s �,'' ` i ; � t �. � � - €. xk �'�� _� � � � ��^�k � � . � s . 1 �'s" �.' r . , � ';_ n�" t +� =.�k . . �:Y# �.[ �'- , r • �?! w � w -" ;�1' �s � , � � � � �, � ip /. ._N � ! ! � �C � !' _.. r ' � s �, a rf! a• , � w,.i }� � L'>�?R1Q' �� . � .ri '� ` .. � "' r 4 r � . . . ; ". t � F a ; ��' _ ` � � � ��. : �; . � � �' � �t � � �: �'�!' tt. . �; f� ! � '► � �; _ ' . �" # wr � , � _ �. � �' r - �"'�'� � �> �...- � �� ,� _ � i OGO �. Cre .�.i ` " ~ � t � � �` r t ^ _ �s �„ ' M, . . ' t t � » � . � � :a,tv�. - l '�" + T-e�.... . , - .. t j ► y � Cf F� e'c ;; � �, -�-�' t ..� . ) r , f� c"" r 'i --- ----�---- � • ' � �' � � t i f:i�k�'s. Nfichael s. T.J. Maxx. ' ,� � i '*�►-.._.,,,• � �4 ,� . .y �'�' ��'� � �,*. � -.�� " �` PW NlarKet. Rre Aid � - - �` - ,� � � � �:, . � � — - _ _ � - -- _ ---- �- ;. -� _ ' . -°� � �#� � �� `' _� ', ,� �y` ..t �'' �� - 1 --- . �� ► = C7 � Ec' y ` �. x.: •' � _t. _- , -. � � , �.. �,..r.�. ��' , � � _ - � _. �, 'f�'� , ..,.., . , .. . F, '� 'r '� . . ... . _-�r. �...,.��.,,.�� _ � �. _ - . '-"' � ... i:.. a �y'�r's�. � . . � F . _ !Fi` �fa' - �'aT � � �� a ,�' ; K .� •,r..� -� .'� � � . �. .. .�.,1w. � i Y�R i .�- � � �. � �t . � , - - � � � � --- • � . ; .-� ._ - ��`� � _..y � 1 ', , y. u �, +�� , � _ , .. . Y 1 �� i r ��_ :wr. � � � �, ,. � � "A � _ •1 � . � � � r T` �, _ s � Y ,r�. s a _ - , F � . y � r � � :� �':�- .� � �.� ��^ , � r � ,� � --�- ,� � �„ � ' , ,� ��= � - � .�. y 7 �,. �.,.,.,.,� ,�� _� _. ` � :�.-� . . ,. ' .' i.a:' • � � � y�� a.1?YJ � � ,'� �I .�.�L I A r �'-.. . �.f.� ! f"' ~ , �� ." .�� f � , I � � 4 + i �. �., ...,., w.. .� .,.�...�._...��.►r'"'�'�..°' �.� �r. � �f,t; ,1�,�� ` �-�`_� � i� � !�t �a `�p !�''�`�`�w :'�'�„' .� - � e�i + �' �: ! s . � k.x - ^# -e �i.� ., ,� . � �`$r ��,,,;�q�+'t'.� ,:«Mr�n .. �. ,;,1' ' �� . . :,.n ..a��sai. �sw��` � . _ . - . � � � . _ � _ r •• � . Figure 1: Aerial of Project Site 2-2 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) Apri113, 2010 Page 3 DISCUSSION Proj ect Description The proposed project encompasses three parcels (see Attachment 9- Plan Set). The parcel on the northvvest of the project site is a drive-through fast food restaurant, Carl's Jr. The par�el in the middle has a pad building with TOGO's, Great Clips and a Laundromat. The larger shoppuzg center spans across two parcels and is occupied by Kinko's, Michaels, �'.J. Maxx, P.W. Market and Rite Aid. The site is accessed by two existing driveways from Homestead Road and one driveway each from Franco Court and N. De Anza Boulevard. 9M�` _ ' � �° . _...,.... �, A° ` �StKrM-s ; � � .� �H � �'. „f ,�7#t6 i :1�' . �1G - ST�R1 � [�� * �f IC ['��'NL `� , � ( �' j �J� !. � �'� rww.�n.; ,y ry . �M'Mr �('1'wPr° '�9. �' K ��. K. . �� . . �.� ' � ,. .v . � � � � a.r.n c W � ._ . + �. E .. �. .. �, . . �,. � �� . .� . �'r•��". �°' .� � . .. F ` . :2� � . ' , � ��t7'YYlMill . A. . . . .. ... . . , A � -- ...�..,a.�-�►�. �"` � :dj�. , - �..�.� .�..� - tl�i'�"� �►U RO RLi �a►r+r - ` ..:.��. ! � — "" .. �. �. � - r �� . � ' _ . . � _ r i ` , . ' ' _: E� y �� y � � �� .r.+.«,m � ! '. � � , d . � - _ . t ��-'� � � � �Y � ' � � rf=x�, � t c�.r ` _ .. . � �_ . •:i � �. � ` � � � � � � __... �� - - — � - �nu...a�.� � � __ '� _�. 611(�6; ' ;, r �,,..�o..,.�.� �► �►'i � �,,,, � �►�i1 � . 4 _ o � �. ?�—�� ' � �!'� - - � � � � �" - � � � < _�, _ a • � � '�I � a�.n..oc .� � ( � j . � . $ _ - � � � � .. ,� s1� � �r ; � .�� , . � � � , �r � �., � o , � �� # � � � � � �..r..�. o � �� !'� irl� � � � � � �"'' '� � �► �r �r . v "��.i l 1 � < � t � � � • . . . �-. "._ . . �� _. . -' s _ . ►�„�� ..t"�' ♦ .� «.!' _ ._ y„��. ��►'+-� �.. � �. � �-�r .-► -- �. � � r � � �. .. _ . . • . _ ..— -' - _ 1 4 � . . � �i�lis.; �l:+ � �'rr� - +ca rwr�atwa 1 u ... � 'Jr�'3 wir�nw►ww t �C � � � � 3 JY.' �f � F� L�t '+� �Z'1� �iNS�Tthf�.- ��C' VtM V:�. � �+,]�e + Ith1LR� t�� W.:.' f. ' �Rl� : f.t:..'Y - � 9C.�t ii 7I.:60f 6�T , t' .: � 1 �e�5: .�c cz j w � . � � � <r• � � � , •` � . � �� `:�� .. . . ..w�w _ --t7Q�c-- ; . ... . � . . - � .....�..�` ��e ,�,�� '"..._..._ �.�� .�`, ��. .. .�� ' � � . � _.r. • � �� ' �.�. ' , ,�, ..� ' „�IM��._._ w��A�►�►..1� � a.;� _ .� -� �� . �^�Ii - - - _ _ � waw�r�rcw r�._�-- _- ;�_ ,..- �.� . , �t'�N�Ktaa.�=y��' % ..�"aL�AiMFi � .�_ tf �':�"....i�,�. � . �. .-:.,�` T. .� + � �. .'.. � . �'+« .. _ _ . STJR' ►IIMI�MG !� � � .� � � -;� � Cxi'T++W � ` � . �,, k �: a . 4" .,,� , � iK . � '?� x . ia. 1�ii�S. , � i ...... ...�.�� ..c ..... art da. . �.. Figure 2: Site Plan The applicant proposes to demolish the Carl's Jr. building. The project proposes the �onstruction of four pad buildings along Homestead Road. The largest pad (Pad Building #1) to the east of the site is a 17,340 square foot building which will have a 24-hour Rite Aid pharmacy with a drive-through service. The other three pads are smaller retail/restaurant buildings at 5,460 square feet, 6,250 square feet and 6,900 square feet each. The applicant also requests extended operating hours for another drive-through use in Pad Building # 2, the building closest to the Rite Aid building. The applicant also proposes to demolish approximately 91,736 square feet of the existing shopping center at the rear including PW Market, Ilite Aid and an empty tenant space and, construct 110,508 square feet of new commercial space in their place. The applicant 2-3 - U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-OS Homestead Square (PW Market) April 13, 2010 Page 4 indicates that the spaces will include one 48,028 square foot section for PW Market and two 31,240 square foot tenant spaces. Minor fa�ade improvements are proposed for the remaining rear tenant spaces. Pro�osed site improvements associated with the project include a new parking lot with 793 spaces, landscaping improvements, including the removal and replacement of 124 parking lot trees, and new trash enclosures. The terminus of each driveway from Homestead Road will have a small plaza area with water features, enhanced paving, enhanced landscaping and seating areas along the rear buildings. The project will also provide two public art features along Homestead Road to meet its Public Art obligations. The applicant is also proposing merging the three parcels encompassing the project site into one. Architectural Design New Construction The architectural elements materials on the new buildings have a Mediterranean/Mission architectural theme. The architectural design of the building incorporates the use of different textures to provide visual interest. Materials include Spanish clay-type roof tile, plaster and stone veneer. Other details include Spanish style tower features, gabled entry features and arched arcades to provide visual articulation. The new construction portion of the shopping center will match the height of the existing shopping center entry features and parapet wall heights. The pad buildings along Homestead Road have a more modern flair to the Mission style architecture proposed in the shopping center at the rear of the project. The buildings on the front, including the Rite Aid building, all incorporate the use of plaster and Spanish style tile. The addition of the four pad buildings along Homestead Road will also activate the street edge by putting smaller retail uses along the street. To provide visual interest and articulation along Homestead Road, these buildings include storefront windows, entry awnings and, dining patios. The Rite Aid building is set back from the street behind a parking area. However, enhanced paving and landscaping in front of the building provides additional visual interest. The drive-through pharmacy for Rite Aid is located on the eastern side of the building to minimize visual impacts. The building also has a loading dock that faces the retail buildings to the rear. The applicant proposes to screen the dock with landscaping which will be discussed later in this report. The drive-through use being proposed for pad #2, the building closest to the Rite Aid building, is located behind the building. Existing Shoppi�zg Center Exterior improvements proposed on the existing shopping center building includes minor upgrades including new exterior paint, a new arcade between the existing entry 2-4 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) April 13, 2010 Page 5 areas to add continuity betv��een the new portion of the shopping center and the existing portion of the shopping center and new entry features at each of the existing tenant spaces. � .; ,, , � '� � � �.--„- � `-�� - -. "'F� 1 ,a ,�J� ;.�r ;"�;+ , - � ' '_ _ .rt� tir � r�f �1 � � F�i-: `� �t' ,y f°�l(�_ �� ° r ��ll '� . I f ' ' 1 4 i " ° ` - ' � � � �_ ! f , - u , i _ . - ... - ... �. .. . , .. . . . � . � �, _ �.. � - _,�- ��.. -..� y �V � ,. _ ._. ._ ..� -.- .. �r , i•� � Y " . � . .�_ � - . . _ ` .. . ,� `�ii � � �, � " � .. . . . _ ._. �` -.- : i .. � . - . ,.+•+�:F'^" � .. . .. - ..� _ . . . . . ......_ . �� .. � . . . . .. _. ...__ . ....._. . ..r��._-... ---. - �'- `�.. _._.,,.�.._..� . ., �igure 3: T�eFnaining S�dpping Ceniter without entry ways � . . � - -.. . �;r. �_ . , .. � �. ... � . q ri t � _ �,,. � ' � �.It:�:. � °`` ' � � �.�. . . r s �d � ' - ��." � ` � ,- ' �� f �� -�` " c- �,1 . 4 4 � �. ,� . '"'ir�7n�"�"��j� �1! '` .�4 Rr'4 ! ..��A� �� ,��-•- �S7.�L '';.� � x �, , � r ' .!� � �� ' ... .._... � - . i , i� � ,.,'^� � � � .. . - � •. :... ._._ � . � ' .3. .. . . _ _ ..r �r. . �ry=: . - '�.. , .... : -ai . � .. . �.. . . . . .t�r�4� . � � .. . . _,D ' _ <.� i.�..r � _. '�� . � � . _; ;�..... .. ._. �'L � s.'^-' ..... Figure 4: Remaining Shopping Center with proposed entry ways As seen in Figure 5, the new entry elements appear detached �T�� from the builduzgs and do not ��— ----� - � � �--- � - � --�-=-- -� - _ integrate visually or physically � � � � � with the existing roof design. ; �� ,��' ' — � _ �.. � � _ � �a. � � ..� :� �r � m.. � _�j..r. �— Staff therefore recommends that � � �, , � � ` the applicant work with staff �� and the City's consulting __ __ � architect to desig entry ___--- - � ;- features that integrate better � _ _ --=-��: �- - _ .� visually and physically with the �___ _ � � ,, __ _ __ __4_ _� � - �� . a•r.i. ..7 _ 1 . " '" �.. _ . existing buildings (Examples -�� _ ___ - -____ _._ �, � w . -- shov�rn in Attachment 6). ' ;- _ - ---�- - -�-� Y �� Another o tion for the Plannin -- - - - � - - �- p g �" - � � : Comission's consideration is to remove trte Ymprovements tp Figure 5: Proposed faux entry feature at each remaining tenant the alder buildings until a major remodel or redevelopment is proposed and resources are available for a better integration with the new portion. 2-5 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) April 13, 2010 Page 6 General Plan Allocation The project will require a net commercial allocation of 95,849 square feet. Since there are no remaining commercial allocations left from the "other commercial areas" pot in the General Plan, staff recommends that the project commercial allocation be taken from the Heart of the City (HOC) Special Planning area which currently has 140,984 square feet available. The General Plan allows flexibility of development allocatian between geographic areas. The remaining square footage u1 the HOC planning area after the transfer will be 90,192 square feet. Site Improvements Parking Lot Connectivity The praposed project proposes opening up driveways to the parcel at the corner of Homestead Road and N. De Anza Boulevard. Cross con.nections and shared driveways between commercial properties enhance pedestrian activity, minimize impact on adjacent roads and facilitate an efficient use of land/site design. All of these factors can help bolster businesses and shopping activities. Consequently, it has been a common practice of the City to require reciprocal access easements and / or physical improvements to facilitate parking and driveway connections between commercial . . properties. � � �,� 1` '_� u: � - ,� � . _ .v 4 � . .+�.._ � ( � � � � . �. � �.� y � .. M:` � � � , . � . � � ,5:�-'. �}y � 4 � ,��: �(aM � �� v� ��. :'.�� . `��. �.� � In the late 1980s, the Cit r ' - - �° __ �: �`�� '��`� _ .�.�`�,�w � � y � , � . �, � �� n r � , required the property owner � Homestead Road � � . �� , �� C� � - _ ='_ � �; -� . �xts�� , tne��x: of the parcel at the corner of ". � s.� �� '�� }�� ..�; , ro �.��a i � ;:�_ � � ��, .�� De A1 and Homestead to � � �a y � � �� . � �: record a covenant agreeing to ��T�� - ��" °' ,� RETA I L � �`" "�� ' . � enter into a reciprocal access L , �U I LD I ry� . �� _ RlGNT � � �t��y � � f, f- . agreement as part of their s�. d � � _ �� development approval with 3 , ,�,�.. � � � the intent to complete a �--_. . � '�'� �-'''"� ' �� -.� -. rt -- d driveway connection between � � y �' ' ' ' ' ' G ' ` -�' r ��: t�tE� l TFti%'s"� �t.._ J.:Z � O • � •�� . � ~ the t��vo properties. A --=� � �1— F��"'- r`��' �� •� W c � condition has been added to � Figure 6: Location of new shared driveways with prope � rner the Moc�el Resolution t0 of Homestead and De Anza Blvd. require a similar agreement of the applicant. 2-6 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) Apri113, 2010 Page 7 Parlcing The proposed project provides 793 parking spaces for the entire shopping center at 3.89 parking spaces per 1000 square feet Based on the City's Parking Ordinance, Chapter 19.100, the project 11as 23 spaces less than the 816 spaces required for "general retail" uses at 4 parking spaces per 1000 square feet. The Ordinance provides for alternative parking consideration tllrough a parking study prepared by a licensed tzaffic/parking engineer. Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants was retained Uy the City to conduct a parking � study for t11e project (see Attachment 7). The parking survey included the following methods to determine parking demand for the project: • Using the ITE Manual standards, the parking provided Uy the project (3.89 spaces per 1000 square feet) exceeds the 85% percentile parking demand for similar shopping centers (3.5 and 3.8 parking spaces per 1000 square feet). • A parking survey of the existing site concluded that peak parking demand was 2.13 spaces per 1000 square feet. The proposed project provides consideraUly more parking at 3.89 spaces per 1000 square feet. • A parking survey of two sites in addition to the existiilg site was also conducted. The parking survey concluded that average peak demand for a shopping center of this type is Uetween 3.52-3.85 spaces per 1000 square feet which is lower than that proposed Uy the project. It should be �noted that one of the selected sites, the Grant Park Plaza Shopping Center, has two grocery stores, a NoU Hill and a Ranch 99, with more of a regional draw than a typical shopping center of this type and, therefore, has a parking peak demand of 3.98 spaces per 1000 square feet. Since 76 % of the � proposed project will have medium format tenant spaces with large inventory requirements, it will not generate traffic to the extent that Grant Park Plaza would. Additionally, there will Ue some ability for people to combine shopping trips from one store to the other. Based on the parking study and project characteristics, staff believes that the parking proposed by the project is adequate. However, if the Planning Cominission would like the project to provide a higher parking ratio, the following two alternatives could Ue considered: • Require the applicant to enter into a shared parking agreement with the property owner of the Good Year Auto Service Store. This will result in the potential sharing of 15 parking spaces. • Require the applicant to reduce the project square footage to 199,246 square feet. This will allow a parking supply rate of 3.98 spaces/ 1000 square feet. Lighting � � All new lighting will be required to conform to the standards in the General Commercial 2-7 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) Apri113, 2010 Page 8 (CG) Ordinance, and the final lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved Uy the Community Development Director prior to building permit issuance. 24-hour Drive-through Pharmacy and 6:00 a.m. -11:00 p.m. drive-through on Pad 2 There are no negative impacts anticipated froin the operation of the 24-hour drive- tl ough pharmacy. The closest residential areas are over 150 feet from the drive-through. The hours of delivery and loading/unloading are regulated Uy Cupertino Municipal Code, even though tlle drive-through area operates for extended hours. There are expected to Ue no noise or light impacts from the operation of this drive-through use. However, staff does not recommend approval of the drive-tl�u ough proposed on the pad Uuilding #2, the building closest to the Rite Aid building, due to concerns about impacts on vehicular and pedestrian circulation. It should be noted that General Plan Policy 2-91: New Drive-Up Services allows the approval of drive-throughs only when there is adequate circulation and the architectural features and landscaping is compatiUle with the visual character of the surrounding uses. Tree Removal & Landscaping Parkillg Lot Trees The project proposes removing all 124 parking lot trees (see Attachment 8). These will Ue required to Ue replaced with 134 new trees that are native species, drought tolerant and/ or are suitaUle for planting adjacent to paving and sidewalks. Staff proposes the following conditions for parking lot trees and landscaping: ■ Increase the width of the planter between all parking areas and the side property line to five feet ii1 compliance with Section 19.100.040(N)(5) of the Parking Ordinance. This is the minimum width required for trees to grow successfully in landscape strips. ■ Trees planted along Homestead Road shall be London Plane Trees, to match those already planted to the soutll and the east of the property. ■ Plant a douUle row of London Plane trees along parking lot frontages on Homestead Road. � � Increase landscape screening in planters to the south of the Rite Aid loading dock and replace the proposed Canary Island Pines with species that provide Uetter screening, are drought tolerant and reduce damage to paving. Canary Island Pines do not provide screening at a lower level, are not drought tolerant and pose a hazard to pedestrians from dropping cones. ■ The revised landscaping plan shall Ue reviewed and approved Uy the City prior to issuance of Uuilding permits. 2-8 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-08 Homestead Square (PW Market) April 13, 2010 Page 9 Phasing The applicant is proposing that the project be constructed in two phases. In the first phase, the pad buildings along Homestead Road and some parking lot improvements shall be made closer to the pad buildings. In the second phase, the larger shopping building and the rest of the parking lot improvements are expected to be completed. T`he construction of the second phase of the project is contingent upon funding. Staff recommends that some of the public improvements be constructed in the first phase of construction. These include the separated sidewalk along Homestead Road since the buildings in Phase 1 are along these streets and parking lot improvements recommended by the Traffic Consultant's report to improve pedestrian connectivity. Neighborhood Input On March 13, 2010, the applicant met with 11 residents at a neighborhood meeting arranged by the applicant to introduce the project to the adjacent residential neighborhoods. The main concerns of the residents were about the potential noise impacts from construction activity. The applicant assured neighbors that courtesy notification of the major construction stages such as demolition, roofing and parking lot improvements will be provided. A condition of approval requires review and approval of a construction management plan prior to issuance of building permits as well as notification of adjacent homeowner associations and/or property managers at least one week prior to each major construction stage. In addition, contract information for construction related concerns shall be displayed prominently and a hotline shall be established by the applicant/developer to facilitate/remedy concerns or complaints. Gateway Sign The General Plan identifies six gateway entries into Cupertino. Policy 2-8, Strategy 3 also looks at reviewing new development next to community entry points for opportunities to reflect the gateway concept. The project site is adjacent to one of these entry points and a condition of approval has been added to require a contribution towards a gateway feature. Signage The applicant has provided conceptual designs for signage for illustrative purposes only. These conceptual signs are not a part of this application. A separate application for review and approval of a sign program and signage will be required for the project as a condition of approval. Environmental Assessment The Environmental Review Committee approved the negative declaration (Attachments 2-9 U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08, TR-2010-OS Homestead Square (PW Market) April 13, 2010 Page 10 1& 2) for this project since there are no significant environmental impacts from the re- development of this property. Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: ,� % � i� / '� '% � ��/J�� ii�/%�. � �� , � Gary ao Aarti Shrivastava City Planner Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Initial Study Attachment 2 Negative Declaration Attachment 3 Model Resolution for U-2009-08 Attachment 4 Model Resolution for ASA-2009-08 Attachment 5 Model Resolution for TR-2010-02 Attachment 6 Consulting Architect's solutions for entry features to remaining stores Attachment 7 Traffic and Parking Analysis prepared by Fehr and Peers, Inc. dated Apri11, 2010. Attachment 8 Tree Inventory List provided by the applicant. Attachment 9 Plan Sets C:\Docurnentsalzd Setti�igs\piug\Deskto�\U-2009-OSASA-2009-08AS.docz 2—�� Attachment 1 � �3�o i orre avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX 408 777-3333 - CUPERTCNO -- --- — — --- --- ---- —�---- - --__-- Community Development Department _ _ ----- - _ _ _ ��r��ii►��rr� �� ... u . _ �r � Staff Use Only EA File No. EA-2008-11 Case File IVo. U-2009-08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASA-2009-08 Project Title: Use Permit and Architectural and Site Apqroval to allow the demolition of _ 95,666 s.f. of existing commercial sqace and the construction of apqroximatelv 147,790 s.f. of new commercial space. Project Location: 20580. 20620, 20680 Homestead Road. Project Description: The proiect involves the demolition of three maior tenant spaces in an existing shoppinq center and their reconstruction. The prolect also involves the demolition of a fast food restaurant building and the construction of four commercial satellite buildings. Environmental Setting: Existinq shoppinq center located on two properties on Homestead Road. There are two sateliite buildinQS on one of the properties one of which will be demolished. A tire shoq is located to the east of the shoppinq center. A shoqqing center is located to the north-east of the proiect site with inter-connectivity. A hotel is located to the south-east of the proiect site. There are aqartments and condominiums located to the south, west and north of the qroperty. A new park is being constructed to the west of the property across Franco Court. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) -+/- 14.029 ac. Building Coverage — 31.3% Exist. Building — 153.000 s.f. Proposed Bldg. - 205,124 s.f. Zone — P(CG)& CG-rq G.P. Designation — Commercial/Residential Assessor's Parcel No. — 326 10 051, 326 10 060 and 326 10 063 If Resident6al, Units/Gross Acre - N/A Applic�bie Special Qrea �lans: (Check) ❑ North Vallco Park Special Center ❑ Monta Vista Design Guidelines ❑ S. De Anza Conceptual ❑ N. De Anza Conceptual ❑ S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual ❑ Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual ❑ Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape �f N��t-Re�idential, Bui{clirtg Area - 205.124 s.f. FA�R - 31.3% N6ax. �m�EoyeeslShift - N/A Parking Required 821 Parking Provided 816 Project Sit� is �IV�thEn C��x�rtir�a l�r�a� ��rvice s�rea - YES 0 NO ❑ . 2-11 iWiTt�4t STi�DY SOtlRCE LIST 27. County Parks and Recreation Department A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 1. Land Use Element 29. Fremont Union High School District 2. Public Safety Element 30. Cupertino Union School District 3. Housing Element 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 4. Transportation Element 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department -5.-E-nvironmental-Resources 33. County_Shenff_ _ __ _____ _ _ - --- - - __ - 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 34. CALTRANS 7. Land Use Map 35. County Transportation Agency 8. Noise Element Amendment 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District 9. City Ridgeline Policy 36b Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution 10. Constraint Maps Prevention Program 36c San Jose Water Company B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCIiMENTS E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps Center, 1976) 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Ciara Count�' ____ __ 14. Geological Report (site specific)___ __ ____ 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 �1: County Heritage Resources Inventory 16. Zoning Map 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak 17. Zoning Code/Specific Pian Documents Site 18. City Noise Ordinance 43. CaIEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances 18b City of Cupertino Urban Runoff Pollution Site Prevention Plan 43b National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater C. CITY AGENCIES Site Discharge Permit Issued to the City of 19. Community Development Dept. List Cupertino by the San Francisco Bay 20. Public Works Dept. Regional Water Quality Control Board 21. Parks & Recreation Department 43c Hydromodification Plan 22. Cupertino Water Utility F. OTHER SOURCES D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 44. Project Plan SeUApplication Materials 23. County Planning Department 45. Field Reconnaissance 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 46. Experience w/project of similar 25. County Departmental of Environmental scope/characteristics Health 47. ABAG Projection Series D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 1NSTRUCTIONS A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. ✓Project Plan Set of Legislative Document ✓Location map with site clearly marked �� ' � ` (when applicable) � � � � ' � ' . . •-• � � 2-12 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACTS: The project involves the demolition and reconstruction of a portion of an existing shopping center. The project also involves the construction of four new satellite commercial buildings. The project proposes to add a total of 52,124square feet net to the shopping center. The project is consistent with the zoning on the property. The project is also consistent with the 2005 General Plan and its policies, since the General Plan land use designation for the project area is Commercial/Residential. I � c � i> ��c co cc I �a +� ea �. I �.. ISSUES: �;� e E- ;� �� o �;� Q ! o Q [and Supporting Information Sources] o � � � � � �' o � � � ' Z � a�n � � �I �N- - c ------ --- - - - - -- - - - ---- _ ------------� ---- I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: , a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a ❑ ❑ I ❑ � 0 scenic vista? [_ � �=.-- =-] � � , b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ i ❑ � 0 including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a ( state scenic highway? [_ �� `- �= �� '�` �-�] � c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [` � - � y�] d) Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ; ❑ 0 ' ❑ glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [' � 6.'��] ' Items a throuqh c- No Impact There are no scenic vistas or scenic resources on the project site; therefore, the project will have no adverse effects on scenic vistas or scenic resources. The project involves reconstruction of an existing shopping center; therefore, the project will not degrade the �xisting visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Item d- Less than Significant Impact Four new buildings are being proposed. These will all have interior lighting. However, there are requirements in the General Commercial Ordinance, Chapter 19.56.070(F) has specific regulations that will prevent any significant adverse impacts. � � fl. AGRICULTURE RL�SOURCES: In � ' determining whether impacts to agricultural , resources are significant environmental , effects, lead agencies may refer to the I , California Agricultural Land Evaluation and � ! � Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by j I the California Dept. of Conservation as an ; � optional model to use in assessing impacts ' I on agriculture and farmland. 1Nould the � �, project: � i 2-13 i � � i �,� : �� o �� I � +• �, � o � � ! +.. ISSUES: *�� -�� a` ~�� o� ��a' y �•��Q; y =a a [and Supporting Information Sources] �.. E �+ _�, N E Z E - - - - _ _ _ -- - -- - --- --- a in � v� _� � ��n a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique � ❑ ❑ ❑ � Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide , � Importance (Farmland), as shown on the � I maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland ' � Mapping and Monitoring Program of the j California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use`� [� - ��] ' ---b) Confiict with exis.tinc,�zoning_for___ - -__ - _._ _ ❑ ❑-_ _--- _❑ _ �_ — 0-_-- agricultural use, or a Williamson Act , contract? [�.-��] � � c) Involve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of � Farmland, to non-agricuitural use? [� -��] � Items a throuQh c-- No Impact The project site is currently developed with three commercial buildings; therefore, the project will not impact agricultural land or resources. I T I 1lI. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the � � � significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air , pollution control district may be relied upon ' to make the following determinations. Would ' the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 the applicabie air quality plan? [5 3%.=.�.�4] , j � b) Violate any air quality standard or ❑ ❑ � ❑ � 0 contribute substantially to an existing or � projected air quality violation? [� �f �%.=�-] I I c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net i ❑ ❑ I ❑ j 0 increase of any criteria poliutant for which ' � '' the project region is non-attainment under an , i j I applicable federal or state ambient air quality j � � ! standard (including releasing emissions i � I � which exceed quantitative thresholds for ' � � ozone precursors)? [= �-.-�=] j I d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial j ❑ � ❑ j ❑ � � pollutant concentrations? [' �- =-] ; ' i , e) Create objectionable odors affecting a i ❑ � ❑ , � substantial number o peopl [= =- ==] � � _ 2-14 I j i j C � I � �,� �� o o � � � i � � ISSUES: � �' � � � t � � c'.��'-o� y:�=�� ~ :� = al Ze. [and Supporting Information Sources] �'; �: � � � � � � _ o � � � I � � a ° 'v� i � N � � � cn _ _ - -- -- ---- - - -- - - -- --_ --- - - — items a throuqh e- No Impact The proposed buildings are not anticipated to conflict with any applicable air quality plan, violate any air quality standards, or create objectionable odors within the surrounding area. Standard mitigation measures will be applied to the project as conditions of approval to mitigate odors and dust resulting from construction-related activities. As an added condition of approval of the development, any proposed restaurants shall be required to install filtration equipment such as activated charcoal fifters etc. to minimize odors and other pollutants. i � � � - I-V-. BIOLOGICAL-RESOURCES---Would . i- ---- - ---E----- ---,-- -- — the project: � i � � a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ' ❑ � ❑ � ❑ i 0 directly or through habitat modifications, on j any species identified as a candidate, � � sensitive, or special status species in local or j regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by � the California Department of Fish and Game � , or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? � [� .:.�- �,�] � f i b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ � 0 riparian habitat or other sensitive natural I community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildl'rfe Service? [�. ` C�2; �'�] c) Have a substantiai adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ j � federally protected wetlands as defined by I Section 404 of the Clean Water Act � - (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, � � filling, hydrological interruption, or other � � means? [2�� 3c.=�4] � I � d) Interfere substantiaily with the movement ❑ ❑ ; ❑ i � of any native resident or migratory fish or i ' wildlife species or with established native � � i resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or � i impede the use of native wildlife nursery i � sites? [ � .; � ; _ - % �] � � � j e) Conflict with any local policies or ❑ ❑ ; 0 I � ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ! � o rdinance? [- � � _ =-] 2-15 i � � � c � �, �. � .r � o � *. � � � � � � � _ � � L � � � ' ISSUES: �. t- •- [and Supporting Information Sources] � �� v �', c�3 �° y c E Z E I — -�� -- � �� _ _ a tn -� u? � c � ui_ __ i ' f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted � ' Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural � p ❑ ❑ , � Community Conservation Plan, or other � approved local, regional, or state habitat � � ! i conservation plan? [� � �.%� �-] � � � Items a throuah d and f- No Impact The project site is already developed as a shopping center. There is no change of use and therefore, no biological impacts. ---- -- tem - e = than Significant Impact - - - --- -- 120 trees are being proposed for removal with this project. Adequate replacements are being proposed for the removed trees in compliance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. An arborist report has been prepared for the project site. The arborist has identified 12 trees for relocation on the project site. A condition of approval for the retention and relocation of these 12 trees will be added to the ro'ect. � V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the I � project: � ` I a) Cause a substantial adverse change in � ❑ ❑ ❑ � � the significance of a historical resource as � defined in §15064.5? [�� `� 3 '�`] � � � b) Cause a substantial adverse change in � ❑ I ❑ j ❑ � 0 the significance of an archaeologicai , � resource pursuant to §15064.5? [� �� '� `� ] � ( c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique j ❑ ❑ ❑ i 0 paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [� ' �.�`] ! I i � d) Disturb any human remains, including � ❑ ❑ i ❑ � � those interred outside of formal cemeteries? � � i � L "� =l i � I Items a throuqh d- No Impact The project site is not within a sensitive archaeological area of the city and has no historicaf, archaeological, paleontological or geologic resources. Therefore, the development appiication will not have any adverse effects on cultural resources. ' � ; �OL GEOLOGY AND SOILS - W�uld �he ; � , ; �; project: ' � i ! ; � ; ; a) Expose people or structures to potential ; i ', substantial adverse effects, including the risk i � ; , of loss, injury, or death invoiving: �' � � ' 2-16 i i i�� o �� i ! � � .j � � p +• ca .r I .. � I �eo , � �ca . � � fSSUES: 1 �;�� F oQ l [and Supporting Information Sources] ,;� � E v�', �� a v�', �= E Z E a �n � 'v� � � � , N - - --- -- - I , --- -�__ - --- - � -- __ _ _ --- -- _- - - - — -- - --- -- - -- -- _ ! � i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ❑ � ❑ I � delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo � i Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on ; other substantial evidence of a known fault? ' � Refer to Division of Mines and Geology � i Special Publication 42. [= - - ' -] � � - - � ii) Str ong se ism ic ground shaking? _ _ 0_ � __� _�___ 0 [%_�_ =] j - � iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ � � � liquefaction? [�. � . � _ � ' �] ' i iv} Landslides? [= � � _ �� '-`+] ❑ � � f � � � � b� Result in substantial soil erosion or the ❑ ❑ � I � loss of topsoil? [� � �� ::.-��) I . � c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ i ❑ � ❑ i 0 unstabie, or that would become unstable as , i a result of the project, and potentially result � in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? � �C... }',,.�� d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ❑ ❑ � 0 in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1 �97), creating substantial risks to life or I � property? [� � `'�] I e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ � � j 0 supporting the use of septic tanks or � � alternative waste water disposal systems � � where sewers are not available for the � j disposal of waste water? [� �� ] � ' � � � items a throuqh e- No Impact According to the Geologic and Seismic Hazard Map of the Cupertino General Plan, the project site is located in a VF, Valley Floor, zone. The VF zone includes ail relative(y level valley floor terrain vvith relatively low levels of geologic hazard risk. The General Plan also includes policies that would reduce potential impacts from seismic risk to acceptabie levels. The project shall be conditioned to comply vvith all structural requirements during construction of the development project. � , � �JII. HAZARDS �4ND FtAZ,4RD�l�S ; j � � 9 VIA�'E RI�R LS - the project: � � �� ,� � � a) Create a significant hazard to the public or ❑ '� ❑ I � I ' � the environment through the routine � ' � ; ; transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [_� =� == =_ ==] 2-� 7 i � � i c c � ��.� � � o o � � � .� ISSUES: � .,��- a H ;� � � o , �.�. ;� � o � a a [and Supporting Information Sources] ! �; � �; N � � °' a N � � z � a °� � � � J' - -c- -- — - --- - - - b) Create a significant hazard to the public or ❑ ❑ ❑ � p the environment through reasonably i foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [�% =" � � =-.=.=��] c) Emit hazardous emissions o'r handle ❑ ❑ ❑ p hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, ___ substances,_or waste within one-quarter_mile ._ ___ ______I___ ______ _ of an existing or proposed schooi? I j , [% %_ �� ' � =`�] � ; � � i d) Be located on a site which is included on a� ❑ ❑ ❑ p list of hazardous materials sites compiled , � pursuant to Government Code Section . 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a I significant hazard to the public or the � enviranment? [�.�%.=��.�-,;] �'� � , e) For a project located within an airport land ❑ i ❑ ❑ 0 use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result I in a safety hazard for people residing or , working in the project area? [] � , f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ ' � airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the ; � project area? [ ] I � g) Impair implementation of or physicaily � ❑ i p � ❑ 0 interfere with an adopted emergency � � response plan or emergency evacuation j plan? [� �2 :�� -�] t ! � � I h) Expose peopie or structures to a i � � i � � � significant risk of loss, injury or death j i ; involving wildland fires, including where - � I wildiands are adjacent to urbanized areas or � i where residences are intermixed with ; �� wildlancis?[� % -=] ; j ��, Items a throuQh h- No Imqact � The development is not anticipated to generate hazardous waste, increase the risk of accidental explosion, release hazardous substances, interfere v�ith emergency services, '� increase exposure of people to hazardous vvaste or increase fire hazard in areas vvith flammable brush, grass or trees. The project site is not within a two-mile radius of the nearest airport (fVioffett Airfield/San Jose pirport) and is not listed as a contaminated site in the State of California Hazardous VVaste and Substances Site List. 2-1$ i , � � � c I � � � � � p � � � r.+ I +.+ �S$VES: *'' . eo I— ; F �� p 1— ;� e4 O e4 [and Supporting Informateon Sources] ' �.��., _ � � � � ° ° N � � Z E afl� -J(A � U JN- - - - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - ---- - -- - - _ _ � - �- - - - VlII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER C�UALITY I -- Would the project: I a) Violate any water quality standards or ❑ ❑ ❑ � waste discharge requirements? [- = � = = -] b) Substantially deplete groundwater , ❑ � ❑ � ❑ ' 0 supplies or interfere substantialiy with i i � groundwater recharge such that there would ' � - -- -- ---- - - - -- - ---- _ - � --- - . be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing ' nearby wells would drop to a level ' which would not support existing land uses or pfanned uses for which permits have been granted)? [�� ;� =2] ' e) Create or contribute runoff water which ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or ' provide substantial additional sources of , polluted runoff? [2C�.36 �2] � �� f) Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ ❑ � �� quality? [20.36 �� :�] � i g) Piace housing within a 100-year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? �G.J'j`�`� h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 structures which wouid impede or redirect � flood flows? [� ::��] i) Expose people or structures to a significant ❑ ❑ ❑ I 0 risk of loss, injury or death involving fiooding, ; including flooding as a result of the failure of i a levee or dam? [� �� =�] i j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ ❑ ❑ � � mudflow? [� �� ] � Items a throuqh i- No Impact The proposed development inrill not violate any water quality standards or water discharge requirements, create excessive runoff, substantially deplete ground water supplies, degrade water quality, place housing in a 100-year floor zone, or expose people or structures to risks involving flooding or tsunamis. The project site is not located within a 100-year fiood hazard area. The project is going to incorporate adequa� �st°� mvvater management techniques that ��ill m inimize runoff. All v�aste vdater will be dire�ted�t�S the sewer system. I � I � I C � ++ l4 �SSUES: �+�' v� E" v `, E- v� p� ea [and Supporting fnformation Sources] I� � E H ��' Qi y c E Z E , o .� - d ,m o c� � - - a tn � N �-c ';- "� c� -- - - - - - - ---- - - — _ _____f ----- - – -- I � ; IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would � the project: � ', , , a) Physicalfy divide an established ❑ � ❑ ' ❑ � community? [- � � __ =� ] � , ; � b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ❑ � ❑ , ❑ i � policy, or regulation of an agency with � jurisdictio ove the projec (includi but ---- ---- ------ --_ - — - -- not limited to the general plan, specific plan, i � local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) I adopted for the purpose of avoiding or , i mitigating an environmental effect? � [--�-_ --�_�] � � c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ❑ f ❑ ❑ i � conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [� � r �.2�) : , (tems a - c - No Imqact The rezoning application will not physically divide an established community or conflict with any applicabie habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation pian. The site is currently developed as a shopping center and is surrounded by both residential and other commercial buildings. The project is seeking to transfer 97,181 square feet of commercial development allocation from the Heart of the City area, leaving the Heart of the City area with a remaining commercial allocation balance of 43,803 square feet. General Plan Policy 2-20(4) allows flexibility among the allocations assigned to each geographical area. According to the General Pian, redistribution of development allocation may occur between planning areas provided that there are no si nificant environmental impacts. X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the j � � i project: ; I j i a) Result in the loss of availability of a known � ❑ ❑ ❑ i 0 mineral resource that would be of vafue to i the region and the residents of the state? ; � �, - =� � � b) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 � locally-important mineral resource recovery � ; site delineated on a local general plan, ' specific pl or oth er land u p l a n? [� � �] i ' Items a and b There are no known mineral resources on the project site. , � Xi. i��iSE -- Vlfmuld ti�e pro�eet r e�uft En: � � ' 2-20 i A r r � C "'' � O � ��'' � i � — � }, � eC � O *'' � � ++ ' +.+ i lSSUES: ' � � � � � � *' � ' � � � � � I c=c� w.�eao� h-w. o [and Supporting lnformation Sources] � a; c�I N'c �� Q' N'c E i z� o a� o � � — _ ._ _ a� ain �u� � �, �ii� a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, � ❑ ❑ � � noise levels in excess of standards ; established in the local general plan or noise i � ordinance, or applicable standards of other � . agencies? [� � --] ! � � , b) Exposure of persons to or generatian of ❑ 0 ❑ i 0 excessive groundborne vibration or I roundborne noise levels? � ` � -- 9 " "' ' � - — — -------;— c) A substantial permanent increase in � ❑ ❑ ❑ � 0 ambient noise levels in the project vicinity � � above levels existing without the project? � '� �:. �� ; i d) A substantial temporary or periodic , ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ increase in ambient noise levels in the i project vicinity above levels existing without � the project? [� ` �.==] ' ; e) For a project located within an airport land ❑ ❑ ❑ � use plan or, where such a plan has not been � adopted, within two miles of a public airport � or public use airport, would the project i expose people residing or working in the � project area to excessive noise levels? � [ � �� . �� 4l I � , f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ � 0 airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to i excessive noise levels? [� ' n] � Items a throuqh c and e throuqh f— No Impact The proposed expansion of the existing shopping center wiil not expose people to noise in excess of noise standards or ambient noise leveis, and excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels. Additionally, the project site is not located within an airport land use plan area or private airstrip. Item d— Less than Siqnificant Impact The proposed development will create some intermittent increase in ambient noise levels during the construction activity on the site. However, these �Nill be regulated by the City's Noise Control Ordinance. X�I. POPI�LATEf)N AP�� F!()tdS{F�� -- Ohf�t��d �; � � � �he �rQje�t: i i i , a) Induce substantial population growth in an ❑ ', ❑ ' ❑ i 0 area, either directly (for example, by ! proposing new homes and businesses) or ' ; indirectly (for exampie, through extension of ; roads or other infrastructure)? [_ -_ ==] 2-2� ' � � i � —''�;. � � � ° e�a �}. i ,«. ISSUES: I �;� e�v H �� o i��- ;� Q o Q [ a n d S u p p o rt i n g I n f o r m a t i o n S o u r c e s] i�; �� v, ��' ? y c� Z E c' — � a� • c � .a' — -- -' a o N �� = JN � — --, -- -- — - - 1 b) Displace substantiai numbers of existing ❑ � ❑ ❑ � � housing, necessitating the construction of I replacement housing elsewhere? [� ' � `=] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, � ❑ ; � ❑ � 0 necessitating the construction of � � replacement housing elsewhere? [: ` �-'] j i Items a through c— No Imqact - T-he-pr-ojeet site-is eur - — development will not displace existing housing and will not necessitate replacement housing elsewhere. Additionally, the scope of the project will not induce a substantial rowth in o ulation directl or indirectl . XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES � a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the � � public services ; I i F protection? [` � � `--�] ❑ ❑ p p � Police protection? [�3 a4] � ❑ � ❑ i ❑ � Schools? [2� ��;� �� ] ❑ � ❑ j ❑ � p i � Parks? [�� - . � � 26 �7 � ,] ❑ � p i ❑ � i Other public facilities? [�� 2�'�; -��] p p � p p � � Items a — No fmpact The project site is currently developed with a shopping center within an urbanized area that is served by municipal services, including fire, police and public facilities. Therefore, the development application will not create additional impacts onto existing public services. XI�O. i�ECREAT{ON -- i ; ; j � � � a) VVould the project increase the use of � ❑ ; ❑ ; ❑ i � existing neighborhood and regional parks or � ; other recreational facilities such that � I substantial physical deterioration of the � ' '' ' facility would occur or be accelerated? ' i � L= _ � - �- -- - -=l � ; � 2-22 � � I � � � A*' I �+' � O C�' I � � r . + , � R O *'' !Q � r . + � ++ �SSUES: I ""' � e �' �-- ;._. �*' O � � �`� `� c � = `� ~'�= a ° a [and Supporting tnformation Sources] ;; _� v�', ��' � y�� E Z E aN-� �N � � JN- - � � - — ----_ - - - , -- � b) Does the project include recreational � ❑ � p ❑ ! � facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities �vhich � � might have an adverse physical effect on the � environment? [� ==] ; i i Items a and b- No impact The proposed project is the expansion of an existing shopping center. This use does not generate an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other - ---reereational faeili#ies.-The-proposed projeet also does not include recreational facilities or -- require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- � ' � �� Would the project: + I I a) Cause an increase in traffic which is t ❑ � ❑ � 0 ❑ substantial in relation to the existing traffic i _ I load and capacity of the street system (i.e., , result in a substantial increase in either the � number of vehicle trips, the volume to I capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4.2�� .44] � b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, � ❑ � � a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [�.2C,w�] � c) Resuit in a change in air traffic patterns, ❑ I ❑ ❑ � including either an increase in traffic levels or , I � a change in location that results in ; substantial safety risks? [�.?] � J d) Substantially increase hazards due to a ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatibie i ; � uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [�� -� =�] ; ! � � i � e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ' ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ [= � �_ �� -'�] � ' i i � f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? : ❑ ❑ ; � � ❑ � - - _.�� ; i � � � g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ ! ❑ I � programs supporting alternative ! � ; I ' transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle , � r ac k s)? [= � =] ' � Items c, d, e and q- Ro impact The proposed project does not impact air traffic, does not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature and does not result i i a�iequate emergency access. The project v�ill provide the requisite number af bicycle r��;�as determineci by the Parking Ordinance, i , C ( ;` � t+ � C p '++ I !�4 � ++ I r.+ ISSUES: + � � � � � � *' � I � � � e�a 0 and Su ortin information Sources �� ' � 3•°-� °- y c a� Z� � Pp 9 l o �E �� .o ��E� E -- - - i a cn - J -� - � -c - � vi - - --- - - - - — - - --- -1 � Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, on the site. items a, b and f- Less than Significant Impact A traffic analysis has been prepared for the proposed project. The traffic consultant, Fehr and Peers, has determined that the traffic impacts of the proposed devefopment to the signalized and CMP intersections are less than significant. The traffiic analysis has also determined that the impacts on the freeways are also less than significant. T parking anal f or the proposed project also determines that the parking im pacts are less than significant. — - ---- - -- - - -- -- - -- Parking provided for the project does not meet the City's parking ordinance requirements. The ordinance requires 4 parking spaces per 1000 s.f. for general commercial uses. In addition, there may be uses that are located in a shopping center (i.e., food services and specialized schools) that require more restrictive parking standards. The proposed project provides 3.98 parking spaces per 1 �00 s.f. However, the parking ordinance, Chapter 19.100.040(F)(2), allows projects to conduct a special parking study to determine the parking needs of the proposed project. A special analysis was prepared by Fehr and Peers. The study evaluated the parking standards set forth by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Manual, and concluded that acceptable parking demand for these types of projects ranges from 3.5 - 3.9 spaces per 1000 s.f. This supports the proposed parking supply for the shopping center. In addition, Fehr and Peers surveyed two other retail centers as well as the existing project site to gauge actual parking demand for a comparative study. The survey concludes that the parking demand for these centers ranges from 1.83 spaces/1000 s.f., at the existing shopping center, to 3.98 spaces/1000 s.f., at one of the reference sites. Based on the parking study, the parking being provided by the proposed project is adequate. The proposed development has a large number of large format tenants that do not generate as much traffic as restaurants. A majority of the shopping center, close to 85%, will be large format tenant spaces. Only about 15% of the total s.f. of the shopping center may be available for small format businesses and/or restaurants. Given these factors, the fower parking supply is determined to be a less than significant impact. - � XVI. UTIUTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -' � ; ' Would the project: � � ' � � ; � a) Exceed wastewater treatment ! ❑ ❑ � ❑ I � requirements of the applicable Regional j � ' W Quality Con B [_ �= %� .=�= =-] ; ' b) Require or result in the construction of ! ❑ � ❑ j ❑ 0 new water or wastewater treatment facilities � � ' or expansion of existing facilities, the ' construction af which coulci cause significant ; ' environmental effects? [_� -= -� �=] � ' 2-24 ! ` I I i � � C i �I i �' � � � C �+-��' � � ++ ++ ' ISSUES: � � ��o� t oQ' [and Supporting Information Sources] �,�; c E� y c�� ? y c�� Z � a°in-i JN � � JN- - - _ - - -- � - -- c) Require or resuit in the construction of � ❑ i ❑ ❑ � new storm water drainage facilities or � expansion of existing facilities, the ' construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [� : _ __ _ � =-] e) Result in a determination by the ❑ ❑ ❑ � wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serv t project t it has adequate ___ ___ __ capacity to serve the project's projected ciemand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [� 2� =:= _ _ -] ' f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g} Comply with federal, state, and local ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Items a throuqh g- No Impact The proposed development application will not exceed waste water treatment requirements or require construction of new or expanded water/ waste water/ treatment facilities, or be served by a landfili. There may be construction of some stormwater facilities on site; however, they will not cause environmental impacts. The project site is currently devefoped with an existing shopping center that is served by sanitary sewer service. 2-25 XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE , (To be completed by City Staff) a) Does the project have the potential to ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 degrade th qua lity of the environment, -- -- substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or - - wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife , population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a piant or animal , community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? - b)-Does-the project have impacts-that-are -- - �-- — ---�---- --0--- --0--- - individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable° means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental � ❑ ❑ 0 effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? PREPARER'S AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the information provided in this initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to holci harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature - � Print Preparer's Name �' f U Cl �}-f � S�} 2-26 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (To be Completed by City Staff) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least"oneimpact tha� is a"Potentially Significenf Impact" as indicated by the checklist the - following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources 0 Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Hazards & Hazardous ❑ Hydrology / Water ❑ Land Use / Planning Materials Quality ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities / Service ❑ Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: 0 The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION wiil be prepared. ❑ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ The proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an eariier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as describec! on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the pro d project, nothing further is required. � �363 U t �valuat Dat Y �� ? � f ) ,� oti.+`-� > ( f � ` 5�� -�/ �•`� � . ERC Chairperson �` � � l Daie ; 2-27 Attachment 2 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE March 3, 2010 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on March 3, 2010. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: U-2009-08, ASA-2009-08 (EA-2009-11), TR-2010-08 Applicant: Ken Rodrigues (FBJ Homestead Associates, LLC) Location: 20580, 20620 and 20680 Homestead Road DISCRETIONARY ACTIO�N REQUEST Use permit and Architectural and Site approval to allow the deinolition of 95,666 square feet of commercial space and to construct approximately 147,790 square feet of new coinmercial space consisting of four new commercial satellite Uuildings and tl�uee new major tenant spaces at an existing shopping center FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts. / s / Aarti Shrivastava Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development g/erc/REC EA-2009-11 2-28 U-2009-08 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Attachment 3 Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF 95,666 SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF 147,790 SQUARE FEET OF NEW COMMERCIAL SPACE ARRANGED AS FOUR NEW COMMERCIAL SATELLITE BUILDINGS AND THREE NEW MAJOR TENANT SPACES IN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER FOR A TOTAL OF 203,792 SQUARE FEET, ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ANDA 24- HOUR DRIVE-THROUGH PHARMACY SECTION I: FINDINGS ` WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will Ue located and conducted in a manner in accord with the � Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Conditional Use Permits Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for a Use Permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the suUconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2009-08 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 13, 2010, and are incorporated Uy reference as though fully set forth herein. . SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2009-OS Applicant: Ken Rodrigues (PW Market) Location: 20580, 20620 and 20680 Homestead Rd 2-29 Resolution No. U-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is Uased on the plan sets submitted Uy Kenneth Rodrigues and � Partners Inc, titled "Homestead Square, PW Market/Homestead Retail" consisting of 27 pages labeled "Title, A1-A21, C1.0-C3.0, L1 and L2" as submitted Uy the applicant, except as may Ue amended Uy the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is gianted to allow the demolition of 95,666 square feet of existing commercial space and the construction of 147,790 square feet of new commercial space arranged as four new commercial satellite buildings and three new inajor tenant spaces in an existing shopping center for a total of 203,792 square feet, with associated site improvements as shown in the approved exhibits. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive an allocation of 95,849 square feet of retail commercial allocation from the Heart of the City Specific Plan area allocation. 4. LOT MERGER The applicant shall merge the three lots identified in the Santa Clara County Assessor's Tax Assessment Rolls as APN: 326-10-051, 326-10-060 and 326-10-063 into , one legal lot. 5. DRIVE-THROUGH USES Approval is granted for a 24-hour drive-through pharmacy at Pad Building #1 identified. Approval is denied for the second drive-through lane proposed at Pad Building #2. 6. PHASING PLAN The following improvements will Ue completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Director of PuUlic Works prior to final occupancy of the Phase 1 Uuildings (Rite Aid and the three pad Uuildings along Homestead Road): a. Separated sidewalk b. Street landscape improvements c. Pedestrian improvements in right-of-way recommended Uy the Fehr and Peers, Inc. Traffic Report, dated April 1, 2010. d. Parking lot improvements in area associated with Phase 1 construction as identified on sheet A20 of the approved plan set. 2-30 Resolution No. U-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 3 7. PARKING The applicant shall provide a minimum of 793 parking spaces in accordance with the approved site plan. Future tenants in the shopping center must obtain a business license and an administrative parking analysis is required to ascertain that parking is sufficient on the site. 8. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking/bike racks for the proposed commercial building in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. Final location of the bicycle parking/bike racks shall be reviewed and approved Uy the Director of Community Development. 9. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING PROGRAM , The applicant shall participate in the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Program by paying the appropriate fee in the fee schedule applicable at the time of payment of fees for 52,124 square feet of new construction on the site. 10. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT The applicant shall obtain a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement from the adjacent property owner/ s to the north-east of the property. The agreement shall Ue approved by the City and recorded on the property as a covenant prior to issuance of building permits. 11. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall install public art, in locations approved by the Fine Arts Commission, prior to final occupancy. The public art shall be valued at a minimum of one-quarter percent (1/4%) of the total project budget, not to exceed $100,000. The applicant shall submit a puUlic art plan to Ue reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission prior to installation of the public art. 12. GATEWAY FUND The applicant shall pay $25,000 toward the installation of a gateway feature/ sign in the project vicinity. The amount shall be paid to the Public Works Department. 13. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. The construction management plan shall include the following: a. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 75 feet of any residential property. b. Adjacent homeowner associations and/ or property managers shall be notified by the applicant or his designee at least one week prior to each major construction stage. c. Contact information for construction related concerns shall be displayed prominently and a hotline shall be established by the applicant/ developer to 2-31 Resolution No. U-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 4 facilitate/remedy concerns or complaints. 14. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to Ue reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of • building permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: 1. Increase the width of the planter Uetween all parking areas and the side property line to five feet in compliance with Section 19.100.040(N)(5) of the Parking Ordinance. 2. Trees planted along Homestead Road shall be London Plane Trees, to match those already planted to the south and the east of the property. 3. Plant a double row of London Plane trees along parking lot frontages on Homestead Road. 4. Increase landscape screening in planters to the south of the Rite Aid loading dock and replace the proposed Canary Island Pines with species that provide better screening, are drought tolerant and reduce damage to paving. 5. All shrubs shall be a minimum planted size of 5 gallons. 6. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, California DWR's Model Water Efficiency in Landscaping Ordinance and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 7. The revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. 15. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. This plan shall include all applicable recommendations made by the City's Consulting Arborist report dated January 8, 2010. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: • For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. • No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. • No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenclling is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall Ue consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. • Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four-inch depth. • Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection Uarriers. • Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. 2-32 Resolution No. U-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 5 • A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. Should any tree die due to construction activity or neglect, appropriate replacements shall be planted subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 16. PLAZA AREAS The applicant shall provide detail drawings of the plaza areas depicted on the site plan. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 17. SIGNAGE & SIGN PROGRAM Signage is not approved with this Use Permit application. The applicant shall be required to submit an application for a sign program and signage prior to installation of any signage on site. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. 18. BUILDING COLORS AND MATERIALS The final building colors and materials, including all awnings, trim materials, tiles, stone veneer etc. shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of Uuilding permit. 19. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so that they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. , Screening materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. Any mechanical equipment screening must have noise attenuation and be designed by a certified professional noise consultant to minimize noise impacts onto adjacent residential residents. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall Ue reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 20. RESTAURANT ODOR ABATEMENT All new restaurants shall install odor abatement systems to reduce odor impacts from the restaurants to the adjacent community. The odor abatement systems shall be installed prior to final occupancy of the associated restaurant(s). Detailed plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits. 2-33 Resolution No. U-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 6 21. TRASH AND DELIVERY ACTIVITIES A detailed refuge and truck delivery plan must be prepared by the applicant. The plan shall specify locations of trash facilities, refuge pick up schedules and truck delivery schedules and routes. All trash facilities must be screened and enclosed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. The final plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 22. DEMOLITION REQUIRE All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 23. PROTECT AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major Uy the Director of Community Development. 24. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 25. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 26. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS CurUs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall Ue installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 27. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 28. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 2-34 Resolution No. U-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 7 29. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified Uy the City. 30. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water ' Quality Control Board as appropriate. 31. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 32. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 33. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of t11e affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 34. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT , The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,982.00 minimum b. Grading Permit: $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,217.00 minimum c. Development Maintenance $2,000.00 , Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD e. Power Cost: *'� f. Map Checking Fees: TBD g. Park Fees: TBD h. Street Tree By Developer *'" Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved Uy the PUC 2-35 ' Resolution No. U-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 8 Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees descriUed aUove are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted Uy the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may Ue modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 35. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from puUlic street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. ' 36. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 37. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must oUtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from tlle State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. • 38. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS � The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 39. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan Uy a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 40. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 2-36 Resolution No. U-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 9 41. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environrrtental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 42. WORK SCHEDULE � A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable necessary for , completion of on and off site improvements. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair Director of Community Development Planning Commission G: IPlanninglPDREPORT1RES120091 U-2009-08 res.doc 2-37 ASA-2009-08 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 Attachment 4 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF 95,666 SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF 147,790 SQUARE FEET OF NEW COMMERCIAL SPACE ARRANGED AS FOUR NEW COMMERCIAL SATELLITE BUILDINGS AND THREE NEW MAJOR TENANT SPACES IN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER FOR A TOTAL OF 203,792 SQUARE FEET, ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ANDA 24-HOUR DRIVE-THROUGH � PHARMACY SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino� received an application for a Use Permit, as descriUed in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary puUlic notices have Ueen given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and tlle P1aruling Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: A. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not Ue detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the puUlic health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; B. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; C. The proposal will use materials and design elements such as horizontal siding, , composition roof and simplified Uuilding forms that complement the existing and neighboring structures; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence suUmitted in this matter, the application for an Architectural and Site Approval Permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution Ueginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 2-38 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 2 No. ASA-2009-08 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of Apri113, 2010, and are incorporated vy reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2009-OS Applicant: Ken Rodrigues (PW Market) Location: 20580, 20620 and 20680 Homestead Rd SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on the plan sets submitted by Kenneth Rodrigues and Partners Inc, titled "Homestead Square, PW Market/Homestead Retail" consisting of 27 pages labeled "Title, A1-A21, C1.0-C3.0, L1 and L2" as submitted Uy the applicant, except as may be amended Uy the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. LOT MERGER The applicant shall merge the three lots identified in the Santa Clara County Assessor's Tax Assessment Rolls as APN: 326-10-051, 326-10-060 and 326-10-063 into one legal lot. 3. PHASING PLAN The following improvements will be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works prior to final occupancy of the Phase 1 buildings (Rite Aid and the three pad buildings along Homestead Road): a. Separated sidewalk b. Street landscape improvements c. Pedestrian improvements in right-of-way recommended Uy the Fehr and Peers Inc Traffic Report dated Apri11, 2010. d. Parking lot improvements in area associated with Phase 1 construction as identified on sheet A20 of the approved plan set. 4. PARKING The applicant shall provide a minimum of 793 parking spaces in accordance with the approved site plan. Future tenants in the shopping center must obtain a business license and an administrative parking analysis is required to ascertain that parking is sufficient on the site. 2-39 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 3 5. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking/bike racks for the proposed commercial building in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. Final location of the bicycle parking/ bike racks shall be reviewed and approved by t11e Director of Community Development. 6. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT The applicant shall obtain a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement from the adjacent property owner/s to the north-east of the property. The agreement shall be , approved by the City and recorded on the property as a covenant prior to issuance of building permits. 7. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall install puUlic art, in locations approved by the Fine Arts Commission, prior to final occupancy. The public art shall Ue valued at a minimum of one-quarter percent (1/4%) of the total project budget, not to exceed $100,000. The applicant shall subinit a public art plan to Ue reviewed Uy the Fine Arts Commission prior to installation of the public art. 8. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. The construction management plan shall include the following: a. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 75 feet of any residential property. U. Adjacent homeowner associations and/ or property managers shall Ue notified Uy the applicant or his designee at least one week prior to each major construction stage. , c. Contact information for construction related concerns shall be displayed prominently and a hotline shall be established by the applicant/ developer to facilitate/ remedy concerns or complaints. 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved Uy the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of Uuilding permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: a. Increase the width of the planter between all parking areas and the side property line to five feet in compliance with Section 19.100.040(N)(5) of the Parking Ordinance. b. Trees planted along Homestead Road shall be London Plane Trees, to matcll those already planted to the south and the east of the property. � c. Plant a double row of London Plane trees along parking lot frontages on Homestead Road. � 2-40 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 � Page 4 d. Increase landscape screening in planters to the south of the Rite Aid loading dock and replace the proposed Canary Island Pines with species that provide better screening, are drougllt tolerant and reduce damage to paving. e. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, California DWR's Model Water Efficiency in Landscaping Ordinance and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. f. The revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved Uy the City prior to issuance of building permits. 10. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall Ue prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. This plan shall include all applicable recommendations made Uy the City's Consulting Arborist report dated January 8, 2010. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: • For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. • No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. • No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting Ueneath the dripline of the tree. • Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four-inch depth. • Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. • Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. • A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved Uy the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of , the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. Should any tree die due to construction activity or neglect, appropriate replacements shall be planted subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 11. PLAZA AREAS The applicant shall provide detail drawings of the plaza areas depicted on the site plan. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 2-41 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 5 12. SIGNAGE & SIGN PROGRAM Signage is not approved with this use permit application. The applicant shall be required to submit an application f or a sign program and signage prior to installation of any signage on site. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. ' 13. BUILDING COLORS AND MATERIALS The final building colors and materials, including all awnings, trim materials, tiles, stone veneer etc. shall be reviewed and approved Uy the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of building permit. 14. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the Uuilding or on the site shall be screened so that they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/colors shall inatch Uuilding features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. Any mechanical equipment screening must have noise attenuation and be designed Uy a certified professional noise consultant to minimize noise impacts onto adjacent residential residents. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall Ue reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 15. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent � feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 16. PROTECT AMENDMENTS T11e Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major Uy the Director of Community Development. 17. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that tlle 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 2-42 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 6 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 18. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall Ue provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 19. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 20. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lightiilg fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 21. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 22. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. . 23. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 24. DRAINAGE Drainage shall Ue provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 25. FIRE PROTECTION � Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 26. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall suUmit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 2-43 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 7 27. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,982.00 minimum b. Grading Permit: $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,217.00 minimum c. Development Maintenance $2,000.00 Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD e. Power Cost: �`"` f. Map Checking Fees: TBD g. Park Fees: TBD h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements U. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. . -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted ' Uy the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 28. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar aUove ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 29. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturUs soil. BMP plans shall Ue included in grading and street improvement plans. 30. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 2-44 Resolution No. ASA-2009-08 April 13, 2010 Page 8 31. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT SEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 32. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 33. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must Ue designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 34. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 35. WORK SCHEDULE A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable necessary for completion of on and off site improvements. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Coininission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair Director of Community Development Planning Commission G: IP1mz�zingIPDREPORTIRE'SI20091ASA-2009-08 res.doc 2-45 TR-2010-08 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Attachment 5 Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE REMOVAL OF REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF UP TO 124 TREES AT 20580, 20620 AND 20680 HOMESTEAD ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2010-08 Applicant: Ken Rodrigues (PW Market) � Location: 20580, 20620 and 20680 Homestead Rd SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Corrunission of the City of Cupertino received an application to approve the removal of 124 t� ees that are Uy an approved development plan considered protected trees subject to Chapter 14.18, the Protected Tree Ordinance of the City of Cupertino; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, e�iUits, testimony and other evidence subinitted in this matter, the Plaruzulg Commission finds: 1. That the aforementioned trees are in conflict with the development proposal; 2. That the application for Tree Removal, file no. TR-2010-08, is hereby approved; and 3. That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TR-2010-08, as set forth in the Minutes of the Plaiuzing Coinmission Meeting of Apri113, ' 2010 are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION The approval is based on the plan sets submitted by Kenneth Rodrigues and Partners Inc, titled "Homestead Square, PW Market/Homestead Retail" consisting of 27 pages laUeled "Title, A1-A21, C1.0-C3.0, L1 and L2" as submitted by the applicant, except as may Ue amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 124 t�ees marked for removal in the Tree Inventory List provided by the applicant are approved for removal. All trees are identified by metal tags with a number on them. 2-46 Resolution No. TR-2010-08 April 13, 2010 Page 2 2. TREE REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT The removed trees are to be replaced with 134 24" box trees, species of which shall Ue reviewed and approved, prior to final occupancy on the suUject property by the Director of Community Development. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest with�n this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13+�� day of April 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Plannuzg Corrunission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: , NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: � APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava, Director Paul Brophy, Chair Community Development Department Plannuzg Commission G: � Planni�ig � PDREPORT � RES � 2010� TR-2010-08 res.doc 2-47 � ; � _ --.!� ■ �� ; r+....w.. f '�3r, -^ � . ..�.��"'� . ��.�� ti�� ,� :�,�_ _.- - �� f� � ;.�'' f '' �!f'`�";'�"` � t' � �}; � �_ �� i ''� �'� ` ��i ; �� ,� ; ; � � � �t� _ -, r ' � �' � , �._ . � : � ,� � � - ��: L , , �� , � �.�:,;: �� 4 �� .�:�, .�r,._��, : �( t� -�� :.�-�- i , y � �i� ^ ,� � � �. •�� x �l '� }�. L1 ! f ' . % � � �,`� � 1 q1��1� .�t .M � t � t�; �� , 1� !� *. � W A�� n � � ��' °.� "�{;x � % y � _- i �� p�`.� ��, � . �� ' Ri �. -i � � �� Example of inetal framework '' and flowering vines used � for arched entry element , - � � EXISTING MAJOR 5 EXISTING SHOP3 �--- c��----Q---.-¢--o--�- �---�--- _ � t N ` I � 1 � � EXISTIN� FACADE AND � � � t � � EXISTINO FACADE AND � � � ARCADE TO REMAM .�. -- -- _ .' ...� �{�. .^. �- ` _– -- ♦ ARCADE TO REMAIN � .w J-,J r. ..� _.. ,... ._. . .�.. _. .r... �. _ � 1--i. � .... .._, _. ... � _... _... .�.,. _, .. _ 1 _�,_,_.. .__.. ..� .-,_., .._..,��.. .,. � <.._. .� ..... .,� ...,.. d ,� .,�.. �. �. ..... �...� � — -- ._.. _ _ ' � . � _ _ _ .-. � - : , .. � � �.. _, � 14 15 24 22 1 2 14 16 ?A � - - - -- ---- - — -- Align entry Align entry Alternate framework element trellis element s� n Iocatlon with existing fascia e ve o . . ___ _ - — ._--_ �- with existing fascia ----- -----. - _ u o o y �o � o � oo ,� �• . . .. .� � 1 , t.,-..c � .,.,� y r, �� !T �se e \� e ' � � , r 1 a , �K � �i, f �t � c fc � • ;� ++ .,. a o � o u�' _e. 'o �Q o e s Amy s Ca e a �� ,� ,� � � �.. s ��. , � _... _._ _ , e , .- -�� -'; ^. ^ .--, __ � -� _. ., ._e V � e, . u � — - U „ ' 11 �----- L1 �f =��= .�� I �1 � � . � Amy's Cafe _ c a` -- -- -i �--- r a� - �� ;� ' � - ��; �� _ . � _ __ a � �. , �-_,_ _ _ _ _ _ - � �_ �. _ _ , __ _ _ -_ � Metal framework PROPOSED SION ARFJ1 Columns to match existing PROPOSED SK3N AHE�► �' and flowenn v�nes Wood trellis with flowering vines � • g - see examples above) �`�, � � �-- � � N �, � I � � � Suspended sign or sign on top �� -� f�i �'a, � � �� f � � 1��h i'�a��a� �a.,�� ;��i.�#��;��`��; ic�p ��-* � -.�.��1��c� �1/��3j��r� � ra�r. 3��? PW MARKET / HOMESTEAD RETAIL � CANNON DESIGN GROUP March 15, 2010 Attachment 7 ��°�f� Tr��s��t��r� ��r��c� �.c��s �� r��t ��r��c� �.e�� x��r��v�r� �. - , _ _ — r � 1 � ... � ; _' ' C �fi ... i�.,,A -- . +�&+� . . w � . � . , . . L - � � �' .�� ,. . �►�; .t;� ` �j(�-., i"�� rz x: : d � � ' �� c: � '�' �✓t q ' Y �i'`�5:: � p� A l , � 'f � �'� � � Ay_' '.:� :rt r�' � � .�' �i ��," 4 Ni -' f y . �i /�". � _ '" � - �... . .i . ,: ' � . _ i' � . „ � _ � ' . •� � : �_ ,+ � , �► t � , .,�.. p4� - `� _. _/� _ _ .= , �� . . • "- , ' � � �:�� _ . � -- _ _ � __ - ��,�:t -' � FH� � � �FRS TRANSPORTAT ION CONSULTANTS 16d �: �a�t� �far� �t., �re. 675 S�r� �Q��, CA 95913 �,��9-1 ��1 �k prif 2�t� � �3 2-49 Draft Report PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion Prepared for: City of Cupertino Prepared by: Fehr 8� Peers APRIL 1, 2010 2-50 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... i Project Impacts ........................................................................................................................................ i SiteAccess and Circulation ..................................................................................................................... i 1 . INTRODUCTION .................................................................,..................................................................1 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 5 RoadwayNetwork ................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................................. 5 ExistingTransit Service .......................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Intersection Volumes and Lane Configurations ......................................................................10 Level Service Methods ..................................................................................................................... 10 Existing I�tersection Levels of Service ................................................................................................. 13 Existing Freeway Segment Levels of Service ......................................................................................13 Field Observations ................................................................................................................................14 3. BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................15 Background Traffic Estimates ............................................................................................................... 15 Background Roadway Improvements .................................................................................................. 15 Background Intersection Levels of Service .......................................................................................... 15 4. PROJECT CONDITIONS .....................................................................................................................18 Project Traffic Estimates ....................................................................................................................... 18 Project Roadway Improvements ........................................................................................................... 23 Project Intersection Levels of Service .................................................................................................. 23 intersection Impact Criteria ................................................................................................................... 24 Intersection ............................................................................................................................. 24 Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service ........................................................................................ 24 Project Freeway Impact Criteria ........................................................................................................... 25 Project Freeway Impacts ......................................................................................................................25 Site Access and On-Site Circulation ..................................................................................................... 26 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ..........................................................................................................26 Transit Facilities .................................................................................................................................... 27 Parking Facilities ...................................................................................................................................28 5. CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT AND WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ................................................. 31 Cumulative Traffic Estimates ................................................................................................................ 31 Cumulative Roadway Improvements .................................................................................................... 31 Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................... 31 Cumulative Intersection Impact Criteria ............................................................................................... 31 Cumulative fntersection Impacts .......................................................................................................... 31 2-51 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location and Study Area ............................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 Proposed Project Site Plan .......................................................................................................4 Figure 3 Existing Bicycle Facilities .......................................................................................................... 8 Figure Existing Transit Service ............................................................................................................. 9 Figure 5 Existing Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, Lane Geometries, and Intersection Controls ................................................................................................................................................12 Figure 6 Background Peak H�ur Turning Movement Volumes, Lane Geometries, and Intersection Controls...................................................................................................................................17 Figure 7 Project Trip Distributions and Assignment ..............................................................................21 Figure 8 Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, Lane Geometries, and Intersection Controls. ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 9 Cumulative No Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, Lane Geometries, and Intersection ............................................................................................................... 33 Figure 10 Cumulative With Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, Lane Geometries, and Intersection ................................................................................................................34 2-52 LIST OF TABLES Table ES-1 Summary of Intersection Levels of Service ...............................................................................iii Table 1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions ......................................................................11 Table 2 Freeway Segment Level of Service Definitions .............................................................................11 Table 3 Existing Intersection Levels of Service ..........................................................................................13 Table 4 Existing Freeway Segment Levels of Service ................................................................................14 Table 5 Background Intersection Levels of Service ....................................................................................16 Table 6 Estimated Trip Generation .............................................................................................................19 Table 7 Project Intersection Levels of Service ............................................................................................23 Table 8 Project-Level Freeway Segment Levels of Service ....................................................................... 25 Table 9 Average Passenger Load Values ..................................................................................................27 Table10 Parking Surveys ...........................................................................................................................29 Table 11 Cumulative intersection Levels of Service ...................................................................................32 APPENDICES Appendix A: Intersection Turning Movement Counts and RoadWay Volume Data ...................................35 Appendix B: Level of Service Calculations ................................................................................................ 36 Appendix C: Approved and Pending Development ................................................................................... 37 2-53 - v��w��:- .��. ,; ��'� PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion �`' April 2010 . �' . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY �� This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed PW Market/Homestead Expansion project. The proposed project includes construction of approximately 50,000 square feet (s.f.) of additional commercial space. An altemate project description included 17,340 s.f. of pharmacy with drive through window; 129,249 s.f. of shopping center space; a 58,222 s.f. supermarket; and a 430 s.f. gas station (12 fueling stations). The current proposal does not include a gas station and would generate less net new trips than the previausly proposed project. Therefore, the transportation analysis was based on the more conservative approach that analyzed the site with a gas station. The project site is located on the southwest quadrant of the Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard intersection and is bounded by Franco Court, Homestead Road, and De Anza Boulevard.The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 3,902 net new daily trips, 156 net new AM peak hour trips (85 inbound/71 outbound), and 388 net new PM peak hour trips (195 inbound/194 outbound). These project trip estimates include the pass-by reductions per ITE guidelines. PROJECTIMPACTS Intersection operations were evaluated at seven (7) study intersections with level of service calculations during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak periods for Existing, Background, Project, Cumulative No Project Conditions, and Cumulative With Project Conditions. Levels of service for the study intersections under each scheme are presented in Tabie ES-1. All local and CMP study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service for the both the AM and PM peak hours. Thus, intersection impacts are considered less-than-significant. Freeway segments were evaluated at two (2) segments. Based on the VTA's Congestion Management Program guidelines, both schemes will have a less-than-significant impact on the segments. The projecYs impact to the pedestrian and bicycle facilities is considered less-than-significant since adequate pedestrian facilities are provided and the proposed project does not conflict with existing or planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Fehr & Peers recommends that alternative routes be provided and signed during construction phases of this project, to provide accessible travel paths for pedestrians. The proposed project is expected to generate some transit trips; bus stops are located on Homestead Road/Hollenbeck Avenue-Stelling Road and Homestead Road/Sunnyvale Saratoga Road-De Anza Boulevard. Due to the low project demand and available capacity, the existing transit facilities will be able to accommodate the increase in transit trips and the project will have a less-than-significant impact. A parking study was conducted to evaluate the sufficiency of the proposed parking supply based on the mixed-use development. The study included three sites with similar land uses intended to project on-site parking demand and resulting supply for the project. Overall, the projecYs parking impacts are considered less-than-significant. Fehr & Peers recommends the finat site plan be reviewed for adequate bicycle parking facilities to meet city requirements. SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The site plan has good vehicular access with the existing driveways on Franco Court, Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard, as well as new shared driveways with the existing retail building located on the corner of Homestead Road/De Anza Boulevard. These driveways provide adequate capacity for vehicies to enter and exit the project site. Parking circulation is expected to function adequately, with finro-way 24- foot and 26-foot double loaded parking aisles throughout. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking stalls are accessible and located conveniently to the entrances of the buildings. The site plan proposes � �;;� �� " ,.. . �`: �, FEHR � PEFRS j� � TRANSPORTATIO� CONSULTAA'S , ��„ 2-54 ,.�,.w �:�. PW Market/Homestead Retai! Expansion � ��, . Apri12010 _ ��' ' . _,.r : . rt ;awe;��' new pedestrian walkways to connect the Homestead Road sidewalk directly to the main buildings. Based on the site plan, the circulation elements on the site should provide adequate and safe facilities for the proposed site uses. � � . �.. �. �� :,. ,� . � �: � -��, FEHR � PEERS �i.� � � ,:, ,; TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS ^�� " L � � . ,. _ N I � rn PW Ma�keUHomestead Retail Expansion Apri12010 TABLE ES-1 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Cumulative No Existing Background Project Project Cumulative With Project Peak � in Crit. A in Crit. A in Crit. A in Crit. Intersection Hour Delay' LOS Delay' LOS Delay' LOS VIC' Delay' Delay' LOS Delay' LOS VIC' Delay 1. Homestead Road / AM 41.3 D 41.9 D 42.1 D 0.007 0.3 41.9 D 42.1 D 0.007 0.3 Stelling Road PM 47.1 D 48.7 D 50.7 D 0.025 2.8 48.7 D 50.7 D 0.025 2.8 2. Homestead Road / AM 10.2 B+ 10.3 B+ 10.4 B+ 0.01 0.1 10.3 B+ 10.4 B+ 0.01 0.1 Franco Court pM 11.1 B+ 11.4 B+ 11.7 B+ 0.027 0.4 11.4 B+ 11.7 B+ 0.027 0.4 3. Homestead Road / De AM 37.7 D+ 38.8 D+ 39.3 D 0.006 0.5 38.9 D+ 39.4 D 0.006 0.5 Anza Boulevard [CMP] PM 39.4 D 45.1 D 50.5 D 0.036 9.8 45.8 D 51.2 D- 0.036 10.0 4. Homestead Road / AM 27.4 C 27.4 C 27.5 C 0.002 0.1 27.5 C 27.5 C 0.002 0.1 Wolfe Road PM 32.7 C- 39.3 D 39.5 D 0.000 0.0 39.6 D 39.8 D 0.000 0.0 5. I-280 Northbound qM 23.8 C 24.1 C 24.1 C 0.001 0.0 24.1 C 24.1 C 0.001 0.0 Ramps / De Anza PM 21.2 C 21.4 C+ 21.3 C+ 0.005 0.0 21.4 C+ 21.3 C+ 0.005 0.0 Boulevard [CMP] 6. I-280 Southbound qM 20.0 B- 20.3 C+ 20.3 C+ 0.001 0.0 20.3 C+ 20.3 C+ 0.001 0.0 Ramps / De Anza Boulevard [CMP) PM 19.6 B- 20.1 C+ 20.1 C+ 0.003 0.2 20.1 C+ 20.1 C+ 0.003 0.2 7. Stevens Creek AM 33.8 C- 36.3 D+ 36.3 D+ 0.002 0.0 37.2 D+ 37.2 D+ 0.002 0.1 Boulevard / De Anza PM 52.7 D- 59.4 E+ 59.8 E+ 0.003 0.7 63.5 E 64.0 E 0.003 0.8 Boulevard [CMP] Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized inlersections using methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. 2 LOS = level of service. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX LOS analysis software package. LOS D standard for City of Cupertino intersections. LOS E standard for CMP-designated intersections is. 3 Change in the critical volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) between Background and Project Condilions (Cumulative No Project and Cumulative With Project Conditions). 4 Change in Critical movement delay between Background and Project Conditions (Cumulative No Project and Cumulative With Project Conditions). [CMPJ = Congestion Management Program-designated intersection Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2010. � FF.HR � PEERS iRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS � �` PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion April 2010 -- t � ,� 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the resutts of the transportation impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed PW Market retail expansion project located in the City of Cupertino. The proposed project is located on the southwest quadrant of the Homestead Road and Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road/De Anza Boulevard intersection and includes approximately 50,000 square feet (s.f.) of additional retail space. Currently the project site contains approximately 153,000 s.f. of retail space. The proposed project site location is shown on Figure 1. Figure 2 presents the conceptual site plan for the proposed project. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the potential impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation system in the vicinity of the site, and to identify improvements required to mitigate significant impacts (if needed). Potential impacts were evaluated using methods approved by the City of Cupertino, and the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), the Congestion Management Agency of Santa Clara County. The following intersections (shown on Figure 1) were evaluated for potentially significant impacts: 1. Homestead Road and Holienbeck Avenue-Stelling Road 2. Homestead Road and Forge Way-Franco Court 3. Homestead Road and Saratoga Sunnyvale Road-De Anza Boulevard' 4. Homestead Road and Wolfe Road 5. I-280 NB Ramps and De Anza Boulevard` 6. I-280 SB Ramps and De Anza Boulevard` 7. Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard" ''Designated CMP intersection The existing conditions of the following freeway segments were also evaluated: 1. I-280 between SR 85 and De Anza Boulevard 2. I-280 between De Anza Boulevard and Wolfe Road The operations of the study intersections were analyzed during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours under the following scenarios: Scenario 1: Existing Condifions — Existing volumes obtained from counts, representing peak one- hour traffic conditions during the morning and evening commute periods. Scenario 2: Background Conditions — Existing Condition peak-hour traffic volumes plus trafFic from approved but not yet constructed or occupied developments in the area. This scenario is the basis from which project impacts are determined. Scenario 3: Project Conditions — Background Condition peak-hour traffic volumes plus traffic generated by the proposed expansion. Site access, on-site circulation, and parking conditions specific to the schemes are also analyzed in this scenario. Scenario 4; Cumulative No Project Conditions — Background Condition peak-hour traffic volumes plus traffic from pending developments in the area. � , �� . � x i ,'. � �� 3 �'� � � � FENR Sz PFERS �'� TRANSPORTATION CONSUIihNTS b' `��``' 1 2-57 s a ��. � _ . , _u �,,�,� ,:�. � �: � �. :«.. � .,.;�,. _ PW MarkebHomesfead Retail Expansion ��'_ April 2010 �� Scenario 5: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions — Cumulative No Project Condition peak-hour traffic volumes Plus traffic generated by the proposed expansion. The project is anticipated to add low traffic volumes to the freeway system. Therefore the project will have a less-than-significant impact to the freeway segments and no project-level freeway analysis was conducted. Potential impacts to existing and planned, non-vehicular modes of transportation, including pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as well as transit systems, are also included in this analysis. The remainder of this report is divided into five chapters. The existing transportation system in the study area and the current operations of the key intersections are described in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 evaluates traffic operations under Background Conditions for approved but not yet constructed local developments. Chapter 4 describes the method used to estimate the amount of traffic added to the surrounding roadways by the proposed expansion and impacts on the transportation system under Project Conditions. Chapter 4 also includes a discussion of site access, on-site circulation, parking conditions, and potential impacts to pedestrian and bicycle facilities and transit systems. Cumulative traffic conditions for both with and without the proposed expansion are discussed in Chapter 5. � .��;�� .� �r�,� � . ;, � F E H R& P E E R S �°'��;�;' TRANSPORTRTION C�NSULTANTS f � 2-5 8 _ � �._.�._ :� N I cn ca - D �0 O � � v ° v � � �v c o � � � ¢ v w Y �O O UJ T � � C C >� C � > ln O v 2 pi O W. Homestead Road " E. Homestead Road � � _ � � ° � � � � U � Project Site , � Pruneridge a, > a� � I I T Avenue = �- v �v c � �^ m Z . � � > m N C � Q N � Z Stevens Creek Boulevard LEGEND: � = Study Intersection r, Nol lo Scale � FEHR � PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS December 2�09 SJ09-1111 PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion Project Location and Study Area Figure 1 � � u -,�.e: r a� , � F � • -. sQ°{ ti�.Yw`�y p I .,.. : �' � • � �S1pJt. !� . ! � �. � t�� I �li �,(� �+�.� �` r isr�HO a sroaY F ,. ; �snroo � s Rr, �F � !F t7CIM r' ` �!� cw �`�F!' °Y 4 �. r, ��' � � � i *.k � r NWSI �,� �°1�F"i5.�...:. I�LI. tlM+Ms r . k ,: �,,; � :.� ,� � � � r�: . 1 � �,,� `K lnaai �� r,9- INiER� "'+�" ..�'-..f�'.-.,4� .-� - 1�- ��__�4..-.. � 1��-r y,l... � -R.� — .. ,.,. ._ � ', . . �.-arrt'1 fs IU I. 7t,�11I� � . �-- XE'w Cs!v �iEr+w � rF� � � � 'N L Tl.�j ' �I t tl �4NF '. . I ..�'� .,. � : . . : a f C'l,`rlj�� g �Y � +� , ��Fh,7�� . � i' .. I' ! 111F.RBEG11;]N �' �+ r +;, � NJiEl15ECTKN .,. 1 s �. . .;��. � rewe+inene.A►, �� 7F��5'��. �� f � �! . �-- �A me..��.�-.m �ws.^�ws R�t�eiwr— H� M E 5 T E A D R O A O rew�tesaow+ ,� � , r .. , i ►.�w `. ,,.. ---�. --- '�- . ' . . �:. �, _� % - . f. t _,- t — �� ,-, , . -. -� ; ... _ . � f ,' ,. . e , " '_" _-., _.... .. _ _ . .._ _-�.__. �j �' '�' �+ �,� . f .�,.. " _ !_�� ._ �_— . #�� Lgi iA� �� - ;� L �� `�,-�-�,--� � I _ r 1 N W� I�� '-- ,--.T�� l� I� �� I I I l� I I 11� I I 1 l�!� ,#� y n*' �.;� . 1 j � ' I NEW PAD Jl� � � � � rw�[�f-. � . li., ; . ( I r � � �II NEyy ,�. �_� �� 6ABOSF i � � PAV2 � ' - _ �L�LJ�l.L1.J_ILLUJ ' f ��•.*'rvy �.,:. ��Emt►�C�INfMM ; iA i PAfI d I � 6Z50 Sf � � � - 1 i � � -- - � ' rent�� « � � ( i e.s�, sr � �,y O ; f 1 , ! �� . ' I ' G _ i u I �' '" F „ F xi�, u.�; . �• i M: �� I . . Y. f 11-.. � �I I i! I � i i'� � � I j�! � NEW - RETMI � r- l�I� �. .? �. `�� i �_� _ i � � I I I � - � BUILDING -q1p�1tINAWT� ' '� I _t .__ _ _ O � . t � � � � � i I PAf11 Inr �IOI. � � �; i . : I ��' .. . •� �� li ii �I � i� � � �� _ . O I � �� • 17�JA09F _ :? '�.� � �.t o i �w i , / i 1 I �; � 1 : � s . ..�w.�. ,.,�� .n��..�� . � ��.��- , � i _� � I � 1 � ., ' ' � �:.".,�i . � � � ,� . -- Q �� r� , — o � � ' -N� "`; " ;Y I,i , —_ }_. � � ,L > � � _ ��'-''•��! Q - ~ �� I � I i � i � _ .�. __h�nvt�ro��aw+. -'�� , � . . . �:�.a,,m, 7 i � . ro � �: �-�� f , � �� .�� a - vn�cw.c�,_ . .. _ LL'_. .��r.�i .imnrnrx: =nn W � �' b D � 0 � o ��_� r--, o � ,. EXISTINO j � p p ' 1 � � � i I i � I 11! �. :� )T 16 ��F' •n. o . Y—i � . I ' � �: „ cno � �" — � - �� • 15 j � II II ll 0 . O � - 1�: fi.1AI SF i ' � � i +j .� +} I� p � � � �r.vert»w;c�ncw , , � : , � ,,, � ; � : � � ;- � p � _ � I _I ,- m!;�j�x,dan ( ,. i+ �� i� is . � 7- ( i � i � iri io » 1 ? U F '��" }5� �7t�:tl �n }5� !•�I K A � y' TI)�' } � - f�'� P ( 1 ' M' )' jl��)� M' M_ .-___,�_ -� ' � ! Z s 1 � l �-��k 4 � : � �,, .�,1� ��1��s l; I i I :. I I .�! w-L=��1 '�-�� -: ' �, s ,.h >,�'ii-� t ' '�� ii,�. u �;-- k — � � ., � �r,�y.L.j1•ll_n,�» ��; ° � ; -- . - � q. :s I . r t 4 G.i � i� 3: �.��4;yc� . 1��T il i:�i si - t.w . � 4 . t� � -~ i�F I .� e f` � � 1 � � fi -- ..,.., r na� ...., , - � �i �;y W � LL�;I �� i EXISiING ` rr•.�.._.., t . / ( � II_ �� ,. �� . 911(li'S � �swr.nm.... � _... . - - _ Atl�/ \P�� 1 i ��., ' I . ^ ' ^ �i EXIStllic, � (� (.� \`_. � �;, � � 5.7c0 SF � , � e!" r7FYA�� . . - � � �l � � EXISTI�JG F!(ISTMG NEW NEW � NFW � �ir� PUILDINf. - . y � � i � MIIJUI7 S . MAIUN 4 MA.WR 3 MAJOR 2 M/�JUR 1 � �C . ' .�. � �� i 25 4p0 SF 20.00U SF 31.2A0 SF J1,240 SF (' d8.02B 9F �, � � � � I Cj ` 1 � .. � �:i. �' i • � �:. � (� � � 1 ; � �tP . ! �� . ,J � �'� '��' � � `� .� .,� � ,,, , � . r � � - -� : , "-) �� I � n r. j� .,iv,�� t Ii .� -smcvwe.aattri ( .n n11tCx1 � --- -' -- . . i J �.I,, �� d�'.. �. � J � � ' j . � : , � , --- - - ---- ' F i y ` . , _ r� . _ ' tt . . �, � . I - � � y� � /. 4 �� „y t: ��y�..,.' �.Yn ,,. �. . � � . � �. ' . �+ : .... _ . . . i �+ _ _ V xa+l�� A� �Lt�nrx �', � '- t - nrfn�t�4r7�11 . � � _ -:-, . ` . --a. rr ! �.vYi�... .� . IlWww�0.U�Ui . �� - _ . � � '� � " ^��•RRT'I:IA.'4�6G�PM1�� . �� " ��', ' _ �.� � � � X" ` I y �. �,-.. � � • �> . � E�411NC3 3 �I A �, � p - � T' !.. : � � r '�i�� ,«� � - g# � SidtY NOUSM/3 I � t � Ett;Ttnl , I� �. !�� -' :rt�Ftr � ,� �;� � . , . �Mrq.'a�`illrM�� t .� � �d�`�� ' �s � • . � � _ 1 ��{1TF � .,,,� . .. N07E' �UR /1LL 7 RASH ENCLSOURE UE7AILS SEE SFIEET 1119 �/ ( _+ � �� .on.::.:�.,�:��:� : : : . :�,�e : :�. PW MARKET/HOMESTEAD RETAIL CUPERTINO, CALlFORNIA DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN PW MARKET TADULATION EXISTINO PROPOSED SITE nREA �/-1GA29 /1C (OGA,6G3 SF) +/-15.028 AC (f354,003 8F) BUILDING AREA 153,000 SF 20�,792 5F FA R. 23.4 ^/e 31.1 "/e N OF STORIES ONE ONE MAXIMUM HEI(;N I 30' 30' PARKING l34R STAIIS 793 STALLS U N I- S T A I L 0 3 1 S T � L L S 7 7 2 S T A L I S H/1NDICnPPED 17 ST/1LL5 21 ST�LIS P A R K I N G R A il O 5. 5 S T/ 1 L L 5 / 1 0 0 0 S F 4 ST A L L S / t U 0 0 SF H O U R S O F O P E R/ 1 T I O N 1 A M T O 1 1 r M 8 n M T O 1 1 f' M 24 HdURS - RI7E AID USE RETAII RETAII ZONING DESION/1TION PlCO 8 CO-rQ P/CG d C�-rq n��xeo use �o nNO n.nxeo use ro nr+o nFHFpAt f.[INMERCIM (1VE�I Avl rF11FR111 f:(D.11/FM:U11 nVFRI�v� (3ENERAL PLAN CommerciaUResidenlial CommerciellResidenliAl P�VING I1REA A20,908 SF ( 64.3 %) 340,602 SF ( 52.1 %) 1/1Nn5(:/1PF I1Nn Rf),755 SF ( 17 7°�) 110,2fQ S� ( 1f P%) HARDSCAPE AREA TRASH ENCLOSURE KEY U 7RI1SH ENCLOSURE TYPE 1 � z I TRASI I[NCLOSUR[ TYPE Z LJ TRASH ENCLOSURE TYpE 3 I Al TFlASII ENCLUSURE lYPE 4 n TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 5 Ktv��7.o17 H 1 � ) o� it.ie I�. o� i o i o t7.�.ip��! o, ,,.e, . , . . . A ��N o .� . �a ,.� � FEHf� � PEERS TRANSPORTAT CONSULTANTS March 2010 SJ09-1111 PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion Proposed Project Site Plan Figure 2 ;.�-:.,;.:: . ��.r, PW MarkeUHomestead Retai! Expansion � - �., : Apri12010 ,,� -� � ., 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS This chapter describes the existing conditions of the roadway facilities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, transit service, plus existing traffic volumes, and intersection operations. This chapter also includes a discussion of the methods used to evaluate the transportation system and the corresponding results. ROADWAY NETWORK The project site location and the surrounding roadway network are presented on Figure 1. Interstate 280, De Anza Boulevard, Horrlestead Road, and Hollenbeck Avenue provide regional access. Driveways to access the site are I�cated on Homestead Road, De Anza Boulevard, and Franco Court. I-280 is a north-south, six-lane freeway with an additional lane in each direction designated as a high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane. HOV lanes, also known as carpool lanes, are restricted for use by vehicles occupied by two or more persons or motorcycles, as well as select alternative fuel vehicles, between 5:00 am and 9:00 am and between 3:00 pm and 7:00 pm on weekdays. The freeway extends from San Francisco in the north to San Jose, in the south. In the vicinity of the site, I-280 runs in an east- west direction and is located south of the site. De Anza Boulevard is a six-lane north-south arterial forming the eastern boundary of the project site. North of Homestead Road and south of Prospect Road, De Anza Boulevard is designated Sunnyvale- Saratoga Road. It extends from Sunnyvale in the north to Saratoga in the south. Homestead Road is a four-lane, east-west arterial that forms the northern boundary of the project site. It extends east from the City of Cupertino through the Cities of Sunnyvale and Santa Ciara. Homestead Road is primarily fronted by residential land uses in the vicinity of the project site. Hollenbeck Avenue is two-lane, north-south roadway located west of the project site. Hollenbeck Avenue is named North Stelling Street south of Homestead Avenue. It provides access to residential neighborhood south of the project site and extends north to the City of Sunnyvale. Franco Court is a two-lane, north-south local roadway extending from West Homestead Road in the north to Celeste Circle in the south. Franco Court is adjacent to the project site to the west. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and off-street paths that are meant to provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities. Sidewalks are provided on all major roads and boulevards within the proximity of the site with one exception; no sidewalks are provided on the west side of Franco Court. All study signalized intersections are equipped with pedestrian signals. Crosswalks are provided on all study intersections with the exceptions of the following approaches: • Eastern approach of Forge Way/Homestead Road • Southern approach of De Anza Boulevard/NB I-280 ramps • Northern approach of De Anza Boulevard/SB I-280 ramps � �� . . � �~ '�� FEHR � PEERS � ;�'�� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTA�?5 _�� 2-61 � � ,.�-r � : �:�'� PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion Apri12010 =�: '" _;;; �, , Bicycle Facilities Bikeway planning and design in California typically relies on the guidelines and design standards established by Caltrans in the Highway Design Manual (Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning and Design, 5tn Edition, California Department of Transp�rtation, January 2001). Chapter 1000 follows standards developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officiais (AASHTO) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and identifies specific design standards for various conditions and bikeway-to-roadway relationships. Under California Law, bicyclists are allowed to use all roadways in California unless posted. Therefore, even for the roadways that have no designated (or planned) bikeways identified, a majority are open for cycling. Caltrans standards provide for three (3) distinct types of bikeway facilities, as generally described below and shown on the accompanying figures. • C/ass I Bikewav (Bike Path) provides a completely separate right-of-way and is designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with vehicle and pedestrian cross-flow minimized. In general, bike paths serve corridors not served by streets and highways or where sufficient right- of-way exists to allow such facilities to be constructed away from the influence of parallel streets and numerous vehicle conflicts. �� .. � � �l • C/ass ll Bikewavs (Bike Lanes) are lanes for bicyclists adjacent to the outer vehicle travel lanes. These lanes have special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bicycle lanes are generally five (5) feet wide. Adjacent vehicle parking and vehicle/pedestrian cross-flow are permitted. 4 *-� r �:�a t 1 s .��: a i;:�� ' „ � �,,,.�. ° ,. ��,� «� ' .: r � _� —E" SOLID VJHITE S7RIPE -- ' /�' . ' .w.:.., "'�. � �� LL �v'+:� � -( � �� , � l � " ,� .'�° , . i r. �.+ .. �''�•' • C/ass !!1 Bikewav (Bike Route) are designated by signs or pavement markings for shared use with pedestrians or motor vehicles, but have no separated bike right-of-way or lane striping. Bike routes serve either to: a) provide continuity to other bicycle facilities, or b) designate preferred routes through high demand corridors. � �'Krs� ��'riP:s r;. � � FFHR �z PEERS ��, }� � I � TRANSPORTATION CO�SULThNTS ^ �� A ' � L L '¢ :� _ . �__� � ,.. � �� t.; �� PW Market�`Homestead Retail Expansion � - . �:. April 2010 , ,,...; f ''� ' <.: _ � SIKE RflUT£ SIGTJ � � � � � r. � � �� . } � � � ��t Bike lanes (Class II) providing direct access to the project site exist along De Anza Boulevard and West Homestead Road. Existing bicycle facilities within the study area are shown on Figure 3. EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) operates fixed route, commuter, and paratransit bus service and light rail service (LRT) in Santa Clara County. Existing transit service near the project is illustrated on Figure 4 and is discussed in more detail below. Roufe 23 is a regular bus route that provides service between Alum Rock Transit Center and De Anza College via Stevens Creek Boulevard. Weekday hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 1:00 am with 12- minute headways. Weekend hours of operation are from 5:40 am to 1:05 am with 15-minute headways. Route 25 is a regular bus route that provides service between Alum Rock Transit Center and De Anza College via Valley Medical Center. Weekday hours of operation are from 6:05 am to 10:15 pm with 30- minute headways. Weekend hours of operation are from 7:20 am to 7:45 pm with 30-minute headways. Roufe 26 is a regular bus route that provides service between Eastridge Transit Center and Lockheed Martin Transit Center. Weekday hours of operation are from 4:50 am to 11:45 pm with 30-minute headways. Weekend hours of operation are from 6:30 am to 10:30 pm with 30-minute headways. Route 51 is a regular bus route that provides service between De Anza College and Moffett Fieid/Ames Center. Weekday hours of operation are from 5:45 am to 7:00 pm with 60-minute headways. Weekend service is not provided. Route 53 is a regular bus route that provides service between West Valley College and Sunnyvale Transit Center. Weekday hours of operation are from 6:05 am to 6:55 pm with 60-minute headways. Weekend service is not provided. Route 54 is a regular bus route that provides service between De Anza College and the Sunnyvale Lockheed Martin LRT Station. Weekday hours of operation are from 6:00 am to 9:35 pm with 30-minute headways. Weekend operations are provided on 30 to 60-minute headways between 7:55 am and 8:40 pm on Saturdays and 8:25 am and 7:40 pm on Sundays. This route operates on Hollenbeck Road west of the site. Route 55 is a regular bus route that provides service between De Anza College and Great America near the site. The hours of operation are from 5:32 am to 11:05 pm with 30-minute headways on weekdays. On weekends, this route operates on 30 to 60-minute headways between 7:50 am and 9:05 pm. This route operates east of the site on De Anza Boulevard. It should be noted that VTA has announced that service to most bus routes including the routes mentioned above will be modified in January 2010. � � �.Y ., ' Lz:x _ .< ;�..k�'.. FEHR & PEERS �� ..,. � �� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTAk1S ";�4��"' '.,{��'�� 2-63 �� N I rn �P � v o - 7 rv C O v � � > Q � 1 ra > O N 7 'n T C �p 41 > _ > O = v Ql O W. Homestead Road "" E. Homestead Road � � ! � � ' -o ° °' � � Project Site � � Prunerid e � � � Q � venue — �- v � c a, rv � m z � � > m � N C . Q N O Z Stevens Creek Boulevard LEGEND: 0 = Study Intersection _. �= Class II Bike Lanes rv Nol lo Scale � FEHR � PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS December 2009 SJ09-1111 PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion Existina Bicvcle Facilities Figure 3 N I � cr � � , o � � v o � �o � c � � o > � � ¢ v ,v Y � o V � U1 -n C C � C O � tn • S p� O � W. Homestead Road " E. Homestead Road . i .� o � v � � Project Site � v Pruneridge o, � � � f Q r� ' � T Avenue .� � a, C N � Z m � .��Y+ � � 1 � � i . � > .�. m N C • Q N � Z StevensCreek Boulevard LEG E N D: �� 0 = Study intersection �� = Regular Bus Service f@ = Express Bus Service N Nol lo Scale � FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS December 2009 SJ09-1111 PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion Existinq Transit Facilities Figure 4 ,;:_�;�+- � :��: ;��.�:�� :x:..- ��' ._ ... PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion r��., _�_�, Apri12010 �-; ¢ `"% EXISTING INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS New traffic counts were conducfed in June and October 2009 during the AM and PM peak periods at five study intersections. The remaining two intersections counts were provided by the City of Cupertino. Peak period turning movement counts are included in Appendix A. The operations of the key intersections were evaluated during weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak-hour conditions. Per city guidelines, the AM and PM peak periods occur from 7:00 am to 9:00 am and 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm, respectively. Intersection operations were evaluated for the highest one-hour volume counted during each period. Per City staff direction, non-Cupertino-controlled intersections were also analyzed during the 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm peak period as well. Figure 5 presents the existing AM and PM peak-hour turning movement volumes, the existing intersection lane geometries, and traffic control devices for the study intersections. LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODS The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service. Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on factors such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, representing congestion-free conditions, to LOS F, when volumes exceed capacity and stop-and-go conditions occur. LOS E represents "at-capacity" operations. Signalized lntersections The level of service calculation method for signalized intersections, approved by the City of Cupertino and the VTA bases, operations on average control vehicular delay calculated as described in Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect conditions in Santa Clara County. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections was calculated using the TRAFFIX 8.0 analysis software and was correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 1. The level of service standard (i.e., minimum acceptable operations) for all of the signalized study intersections in the City of Cupertino is LOS D except at certain locations. According to the City's General Plan, the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard and the De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Road intersections must maintain LOS E+ operations (with no more than 60 seconds weighted average control delay). The same operations method is used by the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to analyze traffic impacts for Congestion Management Program (CMP) intersections. The level of service standard for CMP-designated intersections is LOS E. � �: > -z;� ,�° �. FEHR � PEERS �� °#-�' s, ; k � TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANiS �� „- I 2-6 6 _�� :� ,�� ' � _ .. �-��- PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion `� �- Apri12010 �, z � TABLE 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Level of Average Control Delay Per Service Description Vehicie (Seconds) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression s 10.0 and/or short cycle lengths. g+ Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or 10.1 to 12.0 g short cycle lengths. 12.1 to 18.0 g_ 18.1 to 20.0 C+ Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or 20.1 to 23.0 C longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. 23.1 to 32.0 C_ 32.1 to 35.0 D+ Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable 35.1 to 39.0 p progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Many vehicles 39.1 to 51.0 p _ stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 51.1 to 55.0 E+ Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long 55.1 to 60.0 E cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are 60.1 to 75.0 E _ frequent occurrences. 75.1 to 80.0 F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to > 80.0 over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. Source: Traffc Level of Service Analysrs Guidelines, VTA Congestion Management Program, June 2003; Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Freeway Segments Freeway segments are evaluated using VTA's analysis procedure, which is based on the density of the traffic flow using methods described in the 2000 HCM. Density is expressed in passenger cars per mile per lane. The Congestion Management Program range of densities for freeway segment level of service is shown in Table 2. The LOS standard for the freeway segments is LOS E. TABLE 2 FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Level of Service Density (passenger cars per mile per lane) A <11 g 11.1 to 18.0 � 18.1 to 26.0 p 26.1 to 46.0 E 46.1 to 58.0 F > 58.0 Sources: Traffc Level of Service Analysis Guidelines, VTA Congestion Management Program, June 2003; Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. � ��u � � �� .. , �r:;,»�x . FEHR � P�ERS TRRNSPORTRTION CONSULTA�TS 2 - 6 7 �� ., ... I,; c%> o � ° o " I � f7 M � ¢ [7 (D f7 � N l0 _. a o � � �so �3as> � �, � � �� is �ss) � � � � � zis �iss� � v N � E 568 (747) c� �� 921 (1090) � rn � m f— 470 (538) I�� _ � 220 (88) � LL � 26 (23) ,� � � 445 (323) �` r�n Homestead Rd Homestead d Homestead d 74 (359) � � ��1� 29 (29) � U �� 256 (190) � —�' ��1 I 1� 403 (600) � c °°''�� o � � 878 (1014) —► ° N rn 359 (512) —i N �,Q ^ 177 (200) � `—�I �,�c�,,, � 7(18) � m � c� 324 (372) —� Q c n'�i c �I � m N � � � � N 4� N r�i v N O r m� � c� � n N f7 m f`�') � N j N[�D � � � � � �� 7�J ��45� I� C N � B�9 �70�� tN � � � o f 451 (767) v � c � �� 3 � 193 (363) �,1111 � � 931 (499) 111�� o Homestead Rd NB 280 Ramps � 280 amps � 123 (205) � ��1 I � ��111 51D (474) � 11111� 433 (738) � Q � � � 0 3(9) �► � � 188 (320) � N � � a c`�o 445 (259) '� `v' � o� v c� c� � � � M lfl �f1 � ['J N � N N m N O � V O C � m O N a� � � N � > °� � 279 (230) N � m Q � 812 (888) � ,� m � 243 (534) o c � _ � ti a o � o Stevens Creek Blvd a 10 c Y N � � � � a '' — = 3 � i. � �� 111� ° � _ � 234 315 W. Homestead Rd " �' E. Homestead Road 318 (803) � o � Q 142 (387) —� �� N � �, ProjeCt $ite v r n nd � � — > �� p� N c °{'�— T Avenue w � � �. C LL � m Z KEY: � > m XX (YY) = AM (PM) Peak Q Hour Traffic � Z Volumes Stevens Creek Boulevard � = Signalized Intersection PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion � F E N R c�: P E E RS EXISTING PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES, TRANSVORThT!ON �o�s��A�,s LANE GEOMETRIES, AND SIGNAL CONTROLS December2009 FIGURE 5 SJ09-1111 2 -60 ,.;�a� � ,:�� PW Markef/Homestead Refail Expansion s �,;�, Apri12010 .� '"'"` , �.,�°. � ::..J.:_.,.� . . . -.. �.9s�..-�YJ_:.�p..:,- EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Existing lane configurations and peak-hour turning movement volumes were used to calculate the existing levels of service for the study intersections during each peak hour. The results of the LOS analysis for Existing Conditions are presented in Table 3. The corresponding calculation sheets are contained in Appendix B. The results of the LOS calculations indicate that all study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service. TABLE 3 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Peak Count Intersection Intersection Hour Date Control Delay� LOS 1. Homestead Road / Stelling Road AM �6/2009 41.3 D PM 10/2009 Signal 47.1 D 2. Homestead Road / Franco Court AM 06/2009 �p.2 g+ PM 10/2Q09 Signal � � � B+ 3. Homestead Road / De Anza Boulevard AM 06/2009 37.7 D+ [CMP] PM 10/2008 Signal 39.4 D 4. Homestead Road / Wolfe Road AM 07/2007 27.4 C PM 10/2009 Signal 32.7 C- 5. I-280 Northbound Ramps / De Anza AM 06l2009 23.8 C Boulevard [CMP] PM 10/2008 Signal 21.2 C 6. I-280 Southbound Ramps / De Anza AM 06/2009 20.0 B- Boulevard [CMP] PM 10/2008 Signal 19 6 B _ 7. Stevens Creek Boulevard / De Anza AM 10/2008 33.8 C- Boulevard [CMP] PM 10/2008 Signal 52.7 D- Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacrfy Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. 2 LOS = level of service. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX LOS analysis software package. LOS D standard for City of Cupertino intersections. LOS E standard for CMP-designated intersections is. Bold text indicates unacceptable operations by City of Cupertino & CMP LOS standards. [CMP] = Congestion Management Program-designated intersection Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2010. EXISTING FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE Freeway segment densities reported in VTA's 2008 Monitoring and Conformance Report were used to calculate the LOS for the key freeway segments during the AM and PM peak hours. The results of the LOS analysis for Existing Conditions are presented in Table 4. The following freeway segments are operating at unacceptable levels (LOS F): • I-280 Southbound, SR 85 to De Anza Boulevard (PM peak hour) • I-280 southbound, De Anza Boulevard to Wolfe Road (PM peak hour) � � ��:_:.. � u� . , � - �=: �� ,. FEHR � PEERS ' �� 4 ��I,, TRANSPORTATION CONSUL7ART5 r��--t� }��V 2-6 9 , � ��"� �� :: . M� PW Market/Homestead Refail Expansion ,� � � °��.:- � �.�.:� � April 2010 ;,-�-,Y TABLE 4 EXISTING FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE Peak Mixed-Flow Lanes HOV Lanes Freeway Direction From To Hour Density� LOS Speed Density� LOS Speed SR 85 De Anza AM 25 C 66 8 A 67 PM 87 F 18 20 C 70 I-280 Southbound De Anza Wolfe AM 36 D 61 8 A 67 PM 70 F 26 23 C 70 Woife De Anza AM 47 E 46 31 D 65 PM 29 D 65 9 A 70 1-280 Northbound De Anza SR 85 AM 37 D 59 19 C 66 PM 26 C 66 10 A 70 Notes: ' Measured in passenger cars per mile per lane. z LOS = level of service. 3 Density is calculated by using the travel speed from the adjacent segment, as well as the volume (flow) from the adjacent segment adjusted by the volume entering/exiting the freeway at the interchange. Unacceptable operations are shown in bold rypeface. Source: VTA, April 2009. FIELD OBSERVATIONS Field observations of the study intersections were conducted during the morning and evening peak periods in June 2009. The intersections were generally observed to operate at the calculated levels of service for each peak hour as shown in Table 3. All intersection queues were cleared after one cycle. Heavy vehicle flows were observed during both AM and PM peak hours at intersections along the De Anza Boulevard corridor. With the I-280 southbound on-ramp meter in operation, ramp vehicles occasionally queued back to the intersection of De Anza Boulevard/I-280 southbound (SB) Ramps. Moderate congestion occurred on Northbound I-280 in the morning while heavy southbound congestion took place in the afternoon. No spill backs were observed from the off-ramps onto the mainline during either peak hour. � �. , ; ,w FEHR � PFERS � ```��- Y TRANSPORTRTION CONSULTANTS � . �� 2 �� O ''w�,�s . � ��:< �. w.�,'"„�, �; , PW Markef/Homesfead Refail Expansion � � "�. �;��: Apri12010 ` � ,�`'` ' _ . '�.� 3. BACKGROUND CONDITfONS This chapter discusses the operations of the key intersections with existing traffic volumes plus traffic generated from surrounding development projects that have been approved but are not yet constructed or occupied. Background Conditions serve as the basis for identifying project impacts. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ESTIMATES Traffic volumes for Background Conditions were estimated by adding traffic generated by approved but not yet constructed and occupied developments close to the study area to the existing intersection peak- hour volumes. The list of approved projects, presented in Appendix C, was obtained from City of Cupertino planning staff. Approved developments from the City of Sunnyvale were also included. Trip assignments for the approved developments were obtained from traffic impact reports or estimated with Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates and standard engineering practice. If no trip assignment was available, the trips associated with each development were assigned to the roadway network based on the relative locations of complementary land uses and existing and estimated future travel patterns. Figure 6 shows the peak-hour turning movement volumes, the lane geometries, and traffic control devices at the study intersections under Background Conditions. BACKGROUND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS No future roadway or intersection improvements were identified by City of Cupertino staff; existing intersection lane configurations were used for the Background Conditions analysis. BACKGROUND INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Table 5 presents the intersection LOS calculation results under Background Conditions. Appendix B contains the corresponding calculation sheets. Under Background Conditions, all study intersections are expected to operate acceptably. _ ( '. _ . '� "' ,�. 3�TM FEHR & PEERS �^ � TRANSPORTkTION CONSULTANTS ��°',�,�'� �•'�' 2-71 r ��'��, _ w ..�.. _.�;�,:. ��.,_�.- . ��" PW Market/Homestead Refail Expansron , Apri12010 .�:'" �'�R�:t: TABLE 5 BACKGROUND INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Peak Hour Delay� LOS 1. Homestead Road / Steiling Road AM 41.9 D PM 48.7 D 2. Homestead Road / Franco Court AM 10.3 B+ PM 11.4 B+ . 3. Homestead Road / De Anza Boulevard [CMP] AM 38.8 D+ PM 45.1 D 4. Homestead Road / Wolfe Road AM 27.4 C PM 39.3 D 5. I-280 Northbound Ramps ! De Anza Boulevard [CMP] AM 24.1 C PM 21.4 C+ 6. I-280 Southbound Ramps / De Anza Boulevard [CMP] AM 20.3 C+ PM 20.1 C+ 7. Stevens Creek Boulevard / De Anza Boulevard [CMP] AM 36.3 D+ PM 59.4 E+ Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighied average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. 2 LOS = level of service. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX LOS analysis software package. LOS D standard for City of Cupertino intersections. LOS E standard for CMP-designated intersections is. Bold text indicates unacceptable operations by City of Cupertino 8� CMP LOS standards. [CMP] = Congestion Management program-designated intersection Source: Fehr 8� Peers, January 2010. � �� .. Y g, � � '':b' �i; FFHR � PEERS � �� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTAR?S A �� ^ T� J T � G,^' L L : _* �w::� , _ :. ..�� cv m rn o I� � `� N a � ( ) � � � v � I � � � '192 362 � � cO- 3 �_ 1s (66) � N ,� � � zz7 (212) � c c �� 579 (796) i^� � c-�i � f— 942 (1�90) �°` r' m f-- 463 (609) 1�� 1= j 237 (108) � LL /� 29 (36) ,� ' � 456 (342) /� �� Homestead Rd Homestead d Homestead d 74 (359) � �� 1� 29 (29) � �j �� 270 (198) � —�' ��111� 426(643) _� c o �� 932(1098) —� � � � 385(577) —► N � Q o 195 (217) � d ` c� `O 7 (19) � � " = 355 (394) � � a " Q � � � (n L'J v c LL th N ` N h"' O Q N N � �� C� V ' � � I � � � T N � .-. O ('7 � � � N � � c7 R O7 � I> N � > .� v � o � � �� 84 (155) o fD � � 637 (726) N � � ° co .- I o �— 454 (775) c � Q � �� Q �11�� 3 � 2,2 `44,' �1111 ;° j 956 (528) 111�� ° Homestead Rd NB 260 Ramps I SB 280 Ramps � ,Z9 �2�9, � ��11� ��ttt 5z, �49,> � 1t111� 441 (754) � a,� N o, c� 3 � �► u� � 219 (434) � ° o N � n 460 (278) � � � r " `" � �n cc � c o � r> N � N � � � Q � M O � � � � I � °� � 3'11 (294) (D N � IG n N �— 693(1151) �111�� a � � o I� zss cs�s, c � � � m v o 0 Stevens Creek Blvd Y � N p ' T � ?.� _ 3� � �� 111� ° � ` _ � 256 342 �° ' W. Homestead Rd � E. Homestead Road 407 ('1048) � � ^ N 143 (387) —� � m�'? o i 'o! ProjeCt Site _ � Pr n ri � � � N �' o! Q Avenue �n m cv c m . . .. . . .. �, w a c �. m Z KEY: � > 0 XX (YY) = AM (PM) Peak � Hour Traffic ° Z V o I u m e s Stevens Creek Boulevard � = Signalized I ntersection PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion � BACKGROUND PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES, F E!-; R�z P E E R� LANE GEOMETRIES, AND SIGNAL CONTROLS TRANSPORTkTION CD�SULTkNTS December2009 FIGURE 6 SJ09-1111 2-73 . . ..: r::: � . .s. .�cL'�_ .. - «�s.�,n� , . . �. .... .�.�a�.r �. PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion -°�� ::. Apri12010 _ �,;� �° � , �. � .e.��:. 4. PROJECT CONDITIONS The impacts of the proposed project expansion on the surrounding roadway system are discussed in this chapter. The project inciudes reconfiguration of the existing 153,000 s.f. commercial buildings and the addition of buildings on separate pads in the existing parking lot. Project Conditions are defined as existing traffic volumes, plus trips from approved but not yet constructed developments (Background Conditions), plus traffic generated by the proposed project. A comparison of intersection operations under Background and Project Conditions is presented and the impacts of the project on the study intersections are discussed. The proposed project was analyzed using a previously identified project alternative that included a gas station. The trip generation for the currently proposed project generates less trips than the one presented in this report and would therefore have a lesser impact than identified in this report. PROJECT TRAFFIC ESTIMATES The amount of traffic added to the roadway system by the proposed expansion project is estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. The first step estimates the amount of traffic added to the roadway network. The second step estimates the direction of travel to and from the project site. The trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning movements in the third step. The results of the process for the proposed project are described in the following section. Trip Generation The amount of traffic generated by the proposed expansion was estimated using rates published in Trip Generation, S Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008) for Pharmacy (881), Shopping Center (820), Supermarket (850), High-Turnover Restaurant (932), and Gasoline Station (944) land uses. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 3,902 net new daily trips, 156 net new AM peak hour trips (85 inbound/71 outbound), and 388 net new PM peak hour trips (195 inbound/194 outbound). Driveway counts were also conducted on September 23, 2009 to obtain local trip generation rates. Applying the surveyed rates to all uses except the Gasoline/Service Station, yields a trip generation of 146 AM trips (77 inbound/ 69 outbound) and 286 PM trips (129 inbound/157 outbound). These surveys indicate that this shopping center currently generates traffic at a rate that is lower than the ITE rates provided in the 8�' Edition of the Trip Generation manual. Per City Staff direction the ITE rates were used as a conservative estimate of project generated tra�c. Pass-by reductions of 25 percent and 50 percent were applied to the retail and the gasoline station land uses to account for vehicles that are already traveling on the roadways adjacent to the project site. Table 6 summarizes the estimated site trip generation of each scheme. � w � � -. ;� ` �;� FEHR � PEERS � � �a � TRANSPORTATIDN CONSULTANTS w �� '�� f .�:� _...� r � � � �. ;�: {r:" :� _.. .. r.; � PW Market/Homesfead Retail Expansion 4� April 2010 fr �":" . :� -,�,'b; TABLE 6 ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION Dail AM Peak PM Peak Land Use Size Rate Tri s Rate Tri s In Out Rate Tri s In Out Pharmacy [A] 1 ksf o 88•18 1,529 2.65 46 26 20 10.32 179 90 89 Shopping Center 129.24 52.81 6,826 1.15 149 91 58 5.02 649 318 331 [BJ 9 ksf Supermarket [C] 5 8 sf 2 102.25 5,953 3.59 209 127 82 10.49 611 312 299 Subtotal 14,308 404 244 160 1,439 720 719 Pass-by Reduction 25% 3,577 101 61 40 360 180 180 Total 10,731 303 183 120 1,079 540 539 Gasoline Station 12 168.58 2,023 12.17 146 73 73 13.83 166 83 83 [D] Station Pass-by Reduction 5�% -1,012 -73 -37 -36 -83 -42 -41 �'ota! 1,011 73 36 37 83 41 42 Existin9.s QPPing 105 ,� 5.02° ,; .527 .� ;�258�� ..=269.; �(:en er -�:z...o. ....."lcsfi:. .: �52.8�K-: ��.5,545.: �_1:15 r •e�29.:�. �::�74=;: .<: 47,. Existing 48 102.25 4,908 3.58 172 105 67 10.50 504 257 247 Supermarket [F] ksf Subtotai 10,453 293 179 114 1,031 515 516 Pass-by Reducfion 25% 2,613 73 45 28 258 129 129 Total 7,840 220 134 86 773 386 387 Total Net New Trips 3,902 156 85 71 389 195 194 (A+B+C+D-E-F] Source: Trip Generation, 8` Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers. Pharmacy (881), Shopping Center (820), Supermarket (850), High-Turnover Restaurant (932), Gasoline Station (944). Fehr 8 Peers, October 2009. Trip Distribution The directions of approach and departure for the proposed project vehicle trips was estimated using the relative locations of complementary land uses, previous studies, existing travel patterns in the area, and input from City staff. Figure 7 presents the estimated directions of approach and departure for the proposed expansion. _ I � ��:� ..�. .r>„ ' � �� , FEHR � PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULiA�'S �„�, 2-7.5 ��:�:_ • {s .=;k �'. . PW Market/Homestead Retai! Expansion '. ��* ` > .�,�:. � April 201 D Trip Assignment The trips generated by the proposed project were assigned to the roadway system based on the directions of approach and departure. Project trips were added to background traffic volumes to establish intersection volumes for Project Conditions. Figure 7 presents the net new project trip peak hour assignment at the study intersections. Project trips generated by each scheme were added to the Background Conditions to estimate volumes under Project Conditions, which are shown on Figure 8. � � ��htr� . �: �� =k . . a� v.: �. �, k FEHR �z PEERS �� " � TRANSPORTATION CONSULTAN?S ��`�"�� 2 �� A..c�. _ _ ��:� � , � a ',� � � t��9 '� ��s m � � � s— 11 (29) � �� 27 (75) � N�— 17 (39) o f— 8(�8) rn m�5('Iq) c� ii ° j5(11) � �.�i � 0 _ -Romestead � � Homestead FFd� � Homestead f�d Homestead �d � ' 1 � � � � ! U, v 14 (39)-� m 13 (29) --i m .... 33 (75) � o', N � 14 (39) � N �. 6('17) --► - �c 3 (7) � `' a 10 (28) -� Q Q .� � LL y � 9 � � 9 � m �m �m KEY: .�v N 2 � 4 � C7 � N t") � N .�_.� Q �� Q � �,Q Q �, � o °' Q XX (YY) = AM (PM) �� NB 28D Ramps �� Stevens Creek elvd Peak Hour 1 B 280 Ramps I t TrafFic z �q� � Volumes v v N N o o �� = Project Trip Distribution -a 0 � R v rn � � o „ � � o c Y � 10 °/a N 20 % O a °—' 3 � 5°Po � > 5% v �� _ � IZ°� � 9 H o W. Homestead Rd `� E. Homestead Road � 3' y ry 5% �� Project Site 4% 'c Prunerid e � �'� c _ K/' a � �� --- -_ � I z % Avenue LL C •`. � o � , A Z F"� t=� � �7% -o m N Q N � Z Stevens Creek Boulevard �12 °ro � PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion F E N R& P E E�:S PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSPORTAT?ON CONSUITh�TS ASSIGNMENT TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES December 2009 F � G U RE 7 SJ09-1111 2-77 �r..;,�,�:� :�.. � � m io N 1� (D I > O> � � � N �` o � � 199 (361) `'��' � °�..-' 3 �_ 20 (69) � N � � � 227 (212) � c N C � 590 (825) � � ��'+ p f— 969 (1265) o o � m f-- 500 (648) ,� _ ,� z42 �,2z, ,�, LL � � �47> �11�� /� 456 (342) � Homestead Rd Homestead Homestead d 74 (359) � � ��1� 29 (29) � �j �� 284 (237) � —�' ��111� 439 (672) � � o^ 0 965 (1173) —► � Q � 399 (616) —� N N o 0 �95 (217) � dl � �? ° 10 (26) � m ° � 365 (422) � Q � � ° �I lfi C (D LL V N N �`-' O � � C N � [` [D � r ^ � � N � � N lD .� R ["� Q � � � � m v j � � > � o ,f, � �_ 84 (155) `" N � � 639 (730) ° N I � ° r co � `-� �"— 462 (793) `�v � c � �� c �11�� 2,2 `44'' �1111 ° � 956 `5z8, 111�� ° Homestead Rd ' NB 280 Ramps � SB 280 Ramps j 129 (209) � ��1t� �� I tt 523 (495) � 111t1� 447 (771) —� ^ � v m c� o� ri 3 ( 9 ) m ci 2�9 (434) � ° o N � � 460 (278) � �� 1f (O t� � N � [`� N I� N � � � � � O � O LD .� � N tD � �' � 3'11 (294) � Q� � N ch �c c Q f— 893 (1151) �111�� j � o /� 2ss cs�s> o � � m � v o 0 Stevens Creek Blvd Y a � r =' 3 = 3 � > � �� 11t� ° vt , � _ � 2ss saz � ' W. Homestead Rd ' � E. Homestead Road 407 (1048) � � .Q � v 143 (387) —► �� o �I projed Site _ � n r� � � u-, m N �+ o._...... ..._ r Avenue � .� 4 c z " m KEY: -� > m XX (YY) = AM (PM) Peak < Hour Traffic Z � V o I u m e s Stevens Creek Boulevard � = Signalized Intersection PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion � F E�-� �& P� F�s PROJECT PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES, TRNNSPORTkTION �o�s��T��TS LANE GEOMETRIES, AND SIGNAL CONTROLS December 2009 F I G U R E 8 SJ09-11�1 2 —/0 PW Market/Homestead Refai! Expansion �"-� �.,,,,. Apri12010 PROJECT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS No future roadway or intersection improvements were identified by City of Cupertino staff; existing intersection lane configurations were used for the Project Conditions analysis. PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection levels of service were calculated with the net traffic added by the proposed project expansion to evaluate the operating c�nditions of the intersections and identify potential impacts to the local raadway system. The results of the LOS calculations for Background and Project Conditions (with both Scheme 1 and 2) are presented in Table 7. The calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. TABLE 7 PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Background Project Peak 0 in Crit 4 in Crit Intersection Hour' Delay LOS Delay LOS VIC Delay 1. Homestead Road / AM 41.9 D 42.1 D 0.007 0.3 Stelling Road pM 48.7 D 50.7 D 0.025 2.8 2. Homestead Road / AM 10.3 B+ 10.4 B+ 0.010 0.1 Franco Court pM 11.4 B+ 11.7 B+ 0.027 0.4 3. Homestead Road / AM 38.8 D+ 39.3 D 0.006 0.5 De Anza Boulevard PM 45.1 D 50.5 D 0.036 9.8 [CMP] 4. Homestead Road / AM 27.4 C 27.5 C 0.002 0.1 Woife Road PM 39.3 D 39.5 D 0.000 0.0 5. I-280 Northbound AM 24.1 C 24.1 C 0.001 0.0 Ramps / De Anza PM 21.4 C+ 21.3 C+ 0.005 0.0 Boulevard [CMP] 6. I-280 Southbound AM 20.3 C+ 20.3 C+ O.Q01 0.0 Ramps / De Anza PM 20.1 C+ 20.1 C+ 0.003 0.2 Boulevard [CMP] 7. Stevens Creek Boufevard / De AM 36.3 D+ 36.3 D+ 0.002 0.0 Anza Boulevard PM 59.4 E+ 59.8 E+ 0.003 0.7 [CMP] Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average controi delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using method described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX 8.0 level of service analysis software package. 2 LOS = level of service. LOS D standard for City of Cupertino intersections. LOS E standard for CMP-designated intersections. 3 Change in the critical volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) between Background and Project Conditions. 4 Change in critical movement delay between Background and Project Conditions. Bold text indicates unacceptabie operations by City of Cupertino 8� CMP LOS standards. [CMP] = Congestion Management Program - designated intersection Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2010. � ��' rv =� FEHR Sz PEERS � �� ' t. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS ��-" I 2-7 9 M �r � PW Markef/Homestead Retai/ Expansion Apri12010 � ,�:� � INTERSECTION IMPACT CRITERIA The impacts of the project were evaluated by comparing the results of the level of service calculations under Project Conditions to the results under Background Conditions. City of Cupertino A significant project impact to a City of Cupertino signalized intersection occurs if the project results in one of the following: ■ Operations at a signalized intersection deteriorate from LOS D or better under Background Conditions to LOS E or F under Project Conditions; or ■ Exacerbation of unacceptable operations (LOS E or F) at a signalized intersection by increasing the average critical delay by four (4) seconds or more and increasing the volume- to-capacity (V/C) ratio by 0.01 or more. ■ Operations at the De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard intersection to deteriorate to LOS E+ under Background Conditions LOS E or F; or ■ Exacerbation of unacceptable operations (LOS E or F) at the De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard intersection by increasing the average critical delay by four (4) seconds or more and increasing the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio by 0.01 or more. Valley Transportation Authority (CMP Intersections) Significant impacts at CMP intersections located within the County of Santa Clara occur if the addition of project traffic causes one of the following: ■ Operations degrade from an acceptable level (LOS E or better) under Background Conditions to an unacceptable levei (LOS F) under Project Conditions. ■ Unacceptable operations are exacerbated by increasing the critical delay by more than 4 seconds and increasing the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio by 0.01 or more. ■ The V/C ratio increases by 0.01 or more at an intersection with unacceptable operations (LOS E or F) when the change in critical delay is negative (i.e., decreases). This can occur if the critical movements change. The City of Cupertino foliows the CMP impact criteria for CMP intersections. INTERSECTION IMPACTS Both local and CMP intersections continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for Project Conditions. Thus, the project's impact to these signalized intersections is considered less-than- . significant. PROJECT FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE Project-generated traffic volumes were added to existing 2008 traffic volumes for each freeway mainline segment. These volumes were then used to estimate density for each segment under Project Conditions. The resulting freeway segment operations are presented in Table 8. All traffic ass�ciated with the two � � � ��'��" _ � .,� -� f '��'r , FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION C�NSULTANTS �� '�„_h�,r>... - ..;�-�; .;:;,,<� .., PW Market/Homestead Retai/ Expansion �` .- � ' Apri12010 � f.,`� schemes was assumed to use the mixed-flow lanes on the freeway; therefore, HOV lanes were not analyzed under Project Conditions. TABLE 8 PROJECT-LEVEL FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE Existing Scheme 1 Scheme 2 Peak Added % Added % From To Hour Density� LOS Trips Density' LOS Impact Trips Density� LOS Impac Eastbound l-280 SR 85 De Anza AM 25 C 1 25 C 0.01 2 25 C 0.03 PM 87 F 3 87 F 0.04 4 87 F 0.05 De Anza Wolfe AM 36 D 1 36 D 0.01 1 36 D 0.01 PM 70 F 3 70 F 0.04 4 70 F 0.05 Westbound 1-280 Wolfe De Anza AM 47 E 1 47 E 0.01 2 47 E 0.03 PM 29 D 3 29 D 0.04 4 29 D 0.05 De Anza SR 85 AM 37 D 1 37 D 0.01 1 37 D 0.01 PM 26 C 3 26 D 0.04 4 26 D 0.05 Notes: ' Measured in passenger cars per mile per lane. Density is calculated by using the travel speed from the adjacent segment, as well as the volume (flow) from the adjacent segment adjusted by the volume entering/exiting the freeway at the interchange. Density based on volume from VTA's 2008 CMP Monitoring Data. 2 LOS = level of service. 3 Project trips added during the peak hour. Significant impacts are shown in bold typeface. Source: VTA, April 2009; and Fehr & Peers, January 2010. PROJECT FREEWAY IMPACT CRITERIA The impacts of the two project schemes were evaluated by comparing the results of the level of service calculations under Projects Conditions to the results under Existing Conditions. Significant impacts to freeway segments are defined to occur when the addition of project-related traffic causes one of the following: ■ A segment to drop below its acceptable CIVIP operating standard (LOS E); or, ■ The project traffic added to a segment operating at LOS F is more than one (1) percent of its capaciry. PROJECT FREEWAY IMPACTS Based on the significance criteria, the proposed schemes will have less-than-significant impacts on the freeway system. _ f '`�, . � � : FEHR � PEERS �� ,� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS p x � ' 2 � O � � _�°�-r _� �.��2,.�.. _.,�:,.:... �.:� _ � _. �,;�; _ PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion ��= ; Apri12010 , : n� ��"`' � � ��" ` . SITE ACCESS AND ON CIRCULATION The site plans showing the location of the project driveways and the internal circulation system are presented on Figure 2. The site has good vehicular access with the existing driveways on Franco Court, Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard. Driveways on De Anza Boulevard retain partial access (right in-right out) only. In addition, the project has two new shared driveways connected to the existing retail building located on the corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard. They serve as secondary connections to the site. These driveways provide adequate capacity for vehicles to enter and exit the project site. Based on the current site plans, vehicles can circulate the aisles in both directions. Parking circulation is expected to function adequately, with two-way 24-foot and 26-foot double loaded parking aisles throughout. Americans with Disabilities ACT (ADA) compliant parking stalls are accessible and located conveniently to the entrance of the buildings. Based on these plans, the circulation elements on the site should provide adequate and safe facilities for the proposed site uses. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The project site proposes new pedestrian walkways that connect the Homestead Road sidewalk directly to the main buildings. Striping is also available to guide pedestrians within the shopping center. Bicycle racks are provided at each building to encourage alternative modes of transportation. Fehr & Peers recommends that these racks be placed near the building entrances to provide adequate visibility. Bicycle and Pedestrian Impact Criteria The General Plan for the City of Cupertino identifies existing and planned bicycle/pedestrian networks and identifies any improvements and/or related policies necessary to ensure that these facilities are safe and effective for City residents. Using the General Plan as a guide, significant impacts to bicycle/ pedestrian facilities would occur when a project or an element of the project: ■ creates a hazardous condition that currently does not exist for bicyclists/pedestrians, or otherwise interferes with pedestrian accessibility to the site and adjoining areas; or ■ creates substantial increase in demand for bicycle/pedestrian facilities where none currently exist or creates conditions that would lead to overcrowding on existing facilities; or ■ conflicts with an existing or planned bicycle/pedestrian facility; or ■ conflicts with policies related to bicycle/pedestrian activity adopted by the City of Cupertino for their respective facilities in the study area. Bicycle and Pedestrian Impacts As discussed previously, Class II bike lanes are provided on Homestead Road, Hollenbeck Avenue- Stelling Road, and Sunnyvale Saratoga Road-De Anza Boulevard. Bike lanes on Homestead Road provide access to residential units east and west of the project site. Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard connect the southern end of the City of Cupertino, as well as the City of Sunnyvale north of the project site. The project will not eliminate any existing bike lanes immediately adjacent to the site. Sidewalks currently exist along Homestead Road, Sunnyvale Saratoga Road-De Anza Boulevard as well as Hollenbeck Avenue-Stelling Avenue. Sidewalks are provided along the east side of Franco Court. The project is proposing the construction of new sidewaiks along the site's frontage on Homestead Road between Franco Court and De Anza Boulevard. The local bus stops are all accessible via existing ■ `"a'y,,. . .... ... ' . . . � m^: p FFHR � PEERS � ��`� , _rt� : TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANrS �� 2-82 ' �� , : _ . -.�:� ' ,::�:�• ::�,.: PW Market/Homesfead Retail Expansion :_ �.- -- Apri12010 �� x " �. ::� �. , � �Q:. �.�.� sidewalks. Fehr & Peers recommends that alternative routes be provided and signed during construction phases of the project to provide accessible travel paths for pedestrians. The proposed project does not conflict with the existing or preclude construction of proposed future bicycle and pedestrian facilities; therefore, the project would have a less-than-significant impact on pedestrian and bicycle circulation. TRANSIT FACILITIES The proposed project is not proposing any changes to existing transit service to the project site. However, the project will likely increases demand for transit service in the area. Transit lmpact Criteria Significant impacts to transit service would occur if the project or any part of the project: • creates a substantial increase in transit demand that could not be accommodated by existing adjacent transit capacity, measured by comparing the expected transit capacity with the expected project demand for transit service; or • causes a substantial increase in delay or operating cost to a transit provider; or • conflicts with transit policies adopted by the City of Cupertino, or VTA for their respective facilities in the study area. Transit /mpacts To identify potential impacts to transit service in the project area, average load factors were obtained from VTA. These numbers reflect the average passenger loads of bus routes at specific stops. Fixed-route bus service operates adjacent to the site with stops located at Homestead Road/Hollenbeck Avenue and Homestead Road/De Anza Boulevard. Tabie 9 summarizes the average load factors for VTA bus routes servicing these stops. TABLE 9 AVERAGE PASSENGER LOAD VALUES Average Average Average Average Daily Daily Weekday Route Trips Average Load / RouteDirection Location Boarding� Alighting� Ridership / Day Rider/Trip Capacity 53 NB Homestead Rd & 16 13 9 �� 3 33 0.86 Sg Hollenbeck Ave 17 14 15 54 NB Homestead Rd & 6� 22 1010 28 18 0.47 Sg Hollenbeck Ave 6 16 29 55 NB Homestead Rd & � �a 26 3170 42 37 0.97 gg De Anza Blvd 43 Notes: 1 VTA October 2009 boarding and alighting counts. 2 VTA November 2009 weekday ridership counts. 3 Standard bus route seating capacity — 38. 4 Route 55 does not operate in the northbound direction at the project site. � . _ . � �, :;�� FEHR � PEERS �� .'� TRANSPORThTION CONSULTANTS ,�, 2-83 ,�.ry{. -.�= X L'.'""C '''n' � ...+i.A1t � .... . : :.:v� . PW Market/Homestead Refai/ Expansron r�� ,� Apri12010 ,.�;� . " , _,�., According to the City of Cupertino General Plan, transit trips represent 1.5 percent of the daily generated trips in the city. The transit demand from the proposed project was calculated to be two (2) AM peak-hour trips and five (5) PM peak-hour trips. According to Table 9, all routes operate below the standard seating capacity. Due to the low project demand, the existing transit facilities will be able to accommodate the increase in transit trips and the impacts are expected to be less-than-significant. PARKING FACILITIES Parking impacts for the proposed redevelopment of the shopping center are evaluated in this section. The City of Cupertino Municipal Code requires general commercial/retail uses to provide 1 parking space per 250 s.f.(4 spaces per 1,000 s.f.) of space. This land use category is very general and can include a variety of different types of specific land uses. The current site plan provides 793 parking spaces, a supply rate of 3.89 spaces per ksf. To verify that the proposed supply will be adequate to accommodate the projected demand of this project a parking study was conducted that gathered local data from developments with a similar mix of uses. Parking surveys of similar local commercial developments were performed on a weekday and weekend day to obtain additional parking demand information. In consultation with �City staff, the following three commercial sites were chosen for parking surveys: 1. Existing Homestead Project Site 2. Mariposa Shopping Center, 2760 Homestead Road, Santa Clara 3. Grant Park Plaza, 1220 Grant Road, Mountain View All three of the above sites provide a mix of commercial uses that include a supermarket, a general merchandise store (CVS, Rite Aid, etc.), and restaurant space that is approximately ten (10) percent or less of the total size of the shopping center. The sites were surveyed between the hours of 11:00 AM and 7:00 PM on a weekday, and between noon and 5:00 PM during a Saturday in February 2010. Table 10 presents the results of the parking surveys. The parking demand rates from the three surveyed sites range from 1.83 to 3.98 parking spaces per ksf of occupied space. The average demand rate of the three surveyed sites is 3 spaces per ksf, It should be noted that the highest rate was observed at the Grant Park Plaza site which includes a Nob Hill supermarket, as well as a Ranch 99 market. Based on observations of this site, a substantial proportion of the parking demand appeared to be attributable to Ranch 99. The popularity of this type of store as well as the fact that there were two supermarkets is likely the cause of this relatively high parking demand rate at this site. The project site generates a peak weekday demand of 327 spaces or 2.13 spaces per ksf with the current uses. The ITE 85�' percentile demand rate is 3.35 spaces per ksf that is provided in the Parking Generation 3 Edifion. A circulation factor is typicaily appiied to the demand rate to account for peak parking times when the demand is high so that spaces are easily accessible and vehicles to do not have to circulate through the site to find an available space. Typical circulation factors for shopping centers range from 5-15°/o depending on the level of service that is desired to provide customers. Applying these factors would result in a parking supply range of 3.52 — 3.85 spaces per ksf. This is consistent with the surveyed sites parking demands and would accommodate the demand of most of these sites during the surveyed time periods. The proposed supply rate of 3.89 spaces �er ksf is greater than the average rate of the three sites surveyed for this project as well as the 85 percentile ITE rate that is provided. Based on the above surveys and the fact that the existing site is expected to remain similar with the same type of shopping center land uses, the proposed supply of 793 spaces is expected to be able to accommodate the � � . �_ . , � � s .r-` b : FEHR � PEERS �� . . �:% h..: . . TRANSPORTATIDN CONSULTAKTS A �� ," L �. :. i», r� ��.� . .',°s,. .ti. � PW Market/Homestead Retail Expansion �;,. ,_ Apri� 2{Y10 _.... .. � .,. _ ,:_:��•. .,, expected demand with implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, the impact of this development on parking is expected to be less than significant. r The City Code also requires the inclusion of designated bicycle parking for each of the uses on site. For general commercial/retail land use, 5% of the vehicular parking requirement is required. The site plan provides bike racks with no specific quantity. Fehr & Peers recommends that the project provide bike racks that can accommodate approximately 40 bicycles. TABLE 10 PARKING SURVEYS Site #3 Site #1 Site #2 Grant Park Project Site Mariposa Plaza Occ. Occ. Spaces % Occupied Occ. Spaces % Occupied Spaces % Occupied Total # of Parking 941 644 1,019 Spaces ime of Day (Weekday) 11:00 AM 230 24% 247 38% 350 34% 11:30 AM 218 23% 290 45% 410 40% 12:00 PM 258 27% 334 52% 461 45% 12:30 PM 242 26% �,,.�:3��, ,�8, �� 507 50 /o Ylv K S{ R%'- O 1:00 PM 269 29% 331 51 % 499 49% 1:30 PM 264 28% 317 49% :„ ,528 x, �:, .52% ��. 2:00 PM 317 49% 458 45% 2:30 PM 256 27% 288 45% 460 45% 3:00 PM 265 28% 289 45% 434 43% 3:30 PM 258 27% 288 45% 399 39% 4:00 PM 241 26% 299 46% 433 42% 4:30 PM 22g 24% 332 52% 435 43% 5:00 PM 223 24% 305 47% 428 42% 5:30 PM 196 21 % 285 44% 404 40% 6:00 PM 180 19% 294 46% 393 39% 6:30 PM 156 17% 289 45% 403 40% 7:00 PM 132 14% 257 40% 340 33% ime of Day (Saturday) 12;00 PM 218 23% 307 48% 611 60% 12:30 PM 227 24% 328 51 % 609 60% 1:00 PM 238 25% 317 49% 598 59% 1:30 PM 253 27% 308 48% 606 59% � � �"��, , , ^ s* .' . .. .. �� f r F E H R Sz P E E R S � �b� ':'�f� TRANSPORTATION CDNSULTA�15 '�-�� 2-85 �� : V �- PW Market/Homestead Refail Expansion Aprr! 2010 '' � TABLE 10 PARKING SURVEYS Site #3 Site #1 Site #2 Grant Park Project Site Mariposa Plaza Occ. Occ. Spaces % Occupied Occ. Spaces % Occupied Spaces % Occupied 2:00 PM 271 29% 332 52% 629 62% 2:20 PM 357 55% 631 62% 3:00 PM 25g 28% 3:30 PM 249 26% 338 52% 619 61 % 4:00 PM 248 26% 309 48% 610 60% 4:30 PM 239 25% 278 43% 605 59% 5:00 PM �gg 2�% 244 38% 483 47% Center Size (s.f.) 170,000 136,800 174,800 Occupied Space (s.f.) 153,000 126,700 162,500 Weekday Peak Demand 2 � 3 2.75 3.25 Rate Weekend Peak Demand 1.83 2.88 3.98 Rate Notes: 1 Required Supply from City of Cupertino's Zoning Ordinance Table 19.100.040-A. 2 Total project area. 3 Center Size rounded to the nearest hundred. Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2010. � `��.�;�' .. .. FEHR � PEERS �� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS � 2-86 -� _ ,.: «;.. _ . .. � PW Market/Homestead Refai! Expansron �`-� �: Apri12010 ,�_:�,' - � ��a, r.-. 5. CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT AND WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS This chapter presents an analysis of Cumulative Conditions both with and without the proposed expansion. Cumulative No Project Conditions are defined as existing volumes plus traffic generated by approved but not yet constructed developments in the project study area, plus traffic generated by pending developments (those not yet approved). Trips from the proposed project are added to the Cumulative No Project Conditions to obtain Cumulative plus Project Conditions. This chapter describes the procedure used to determine the cumulative traffic volumes and the results of the level of service analysis for both Cumulative Conditions. CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ESTIMATES A list of pending projects was obtained from the City of Cupertino (Appendix C) and the City of Sunnyvale. Trip estimates were then developed using available data and standard engineering practice. These trips were then assigned to the roadway network based on the locations of complementary land uses and anticipated directions of approach and departure. Figure 9 presents the Cumulative No Project turning movement volumes, the lane geometries, and traffic control devices. The trips generated by the proposed expansion were added to the Cumulative No Project Condition volumes and are shown on Figures 10. CUMULATIVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS No future roadway or intersection improvements were identified by City of Cupertino staff; existing intersection lane configurations were used for the Cumulative Conditions analysis. CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection operations were evaluated with level of service calcufations under Cumulative No Project and Cumulative With Project Conditions, and the results are summarized in Table 11. Cumulative No Project Conditions serve as the baseline condition for determining cumulative impacts. All intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service both with and without the project, independent of the expansion scheme. CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION IMPACT CRITERIA Using the same significance criteria as Project Conditions, impacts of the cumulative scenario were evaluated by comparing the results of the level of service calculations under Cumulative without Project Conditions to the results under Cumulative with Project Conditions. CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION IMPACTS Both local and CMP intersections continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for Cumulative with Project Conditions. Thus, the cumulative projecYs impact to these signalized intersections is considered less-than-significan t. � >�. ��, , _ . ... . . . r . .. y, 3 E : $� z FEHR & PEERS `� � �� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS �� ' � �� 2-87 �`'�` A� r �:� :� �. �._.. u .�.::,..�; _ _.. ..�„�,.� PW Market/Homesfead Refai! Expansipn - ` � ' .,�' Apri12010 , ,� a�.-�` TABLE 11 CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Cumulative No Project Cumulative with Project Peak o in Crit o in Crit Intersection Hour' Dela� LOS Delay LOS VIC Defay 1. Homestead Road / AM 41.9 D 42.1 D 0.007 0.3 Stelling Road pM 48.7 D 50.7 D 0.025 2.8 2. Homestead Road / AM 10.3 B+ 10.4 B+ 0.010 0.1 Franco Court PM 11.4 B+ 11.7 B+ 0.027 0.4 3. Homestead Road / AM 38.9 D+ 39.4 D 0.006 0.5 De Anza Boulevard PM 45.8 D 51.2 D- 0.036 10.0 [CMP] 4. Homestead Road / AM 27.5 C 27.5 C 0.002 0.1 Wolfe Road PM 39.6 D 39.8 D 0.000 0.0 5. I-280 Northbound AM 24.1 C 24.1 C 0.001 0.0 Ramps / De Anza pM 21 4 C+ 21.3 C+ 0.005 0.0 Boulevard [CMPj 6. I-280 Southbound AM 20.3 C+ 20.3 C+ 0.001 0.0 Ramps / De Anza PM 20.1 C+ 20.1 C+ 0.003 02 Boulevard [CMP] 7. Stevens Creek Boulevard / De qM 37.2 D+ 37.2 D+ 0.002 0.1 Anza Boulevard PM 63.5 E 64.0 E 0.003 0.8 [CMP] Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using method described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX 8.0 level of service analysis software package. 2 LOS = level of service. LOS D standard for City of Cupertino intersections. LOS E standard for CMP-designated intersections. 3 Change in the criticai volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) between Cumulative No Project and Cumulative With Project Conditions. 4 Change in critical movement delay between Cumulative No Project and Cumulative With Project Conditions. Bold text indicates unacceptable operations by City of Cupertino 8� CMP LOS standards. (CMP] = Congestion Management Program-designated intersection Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2010. � - . . . z ' ^9.%" n A , C .�4 µ . . ��- . . . � FEHR � PEERS F ��:�: TRANSPORTATION CONSULTAKiS ^�^^ o e= -�,. L a a � : .. _.____ i� � � � m � � i� °" a' � � I �' =� i�o � ,'�, � �92 (362) � �=, °3 �� 19 (66) � N � ;�? � 228 (212) � v N � � 579 (797) M �� I� � 943 (1194) m°`r' I m F— 483 (610) � = j 237 (108) ,� LL �— z9 �3s, �11�� i= � 460 ��, � � Homestead Rd � Homestead d I , Homestead d I 74 (359) � �i ��1� 29 (29) 1 U' �� 270 (139) � —�' ��111� 427(643) � m o^� 935(1100) —♦ o � � 386(577) —� N ^ c � co 195 (217) "� ml � ;c ° 7 (19) � m `�' " 357 (396) —� Q V r� � �I V N N LL t'�J N � � � � N W (") Q . [`� 1� � � t7 7 CO � O � r� I N M N M N C') ? W ` D � OJ I'j � o � � �� 84 (156) o N � � 638 (726) � N � o c � I p �' 456 (777) v � Q � �� Q �11�� j 212 `�,, �1111 � j 956 (528) 111�� ° Homesteatl Rd NB 28D Ramps � SB 280 amps � 130 (209) � ��11� ��111 521 (492) � 11111� 442 (758) � Q Q m m Q 3(9) � N� 219 (434) � ° o N � i� 460 (278) � �� v �n n r� a � m c� N W N C O N C m � V O r � � � v N � � m � 3�2 �295� c�a c�.� v Q � 940 (1206) � 1111�� 256 �5�5, � � c � L v o Q _ o Stevens Creek Blvd � ¢ Y d � � °' 3 '' _ ��11t� 3 �? o a � = c ( )� s ' 430 (1330) —� � Q N W. Homestead Rd � �' E. Homestead Road � � j : 148 (405) —► � o � Q ` o �� Pfoject Site o`� Dr n ri e � � � N �' °6'. ¢ Avenue u a, 4 c y`� u � C Z KEY: a > m XX (YY) = AM (PM) Peak Q Hour Traffic � Z V o I u m es Stevens Creek Bou levard � = Signalized I ntersection PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion � F F►-� �& P E F R s CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT TRANSPORTf,TIO� �o�s��TA�,S VOLUMES, LANE GEOMETRIES, AND SIGNAL CONTROLS December 2009 F I G U RE 9 SJ09-1111 2-89 � �o � � m � � � m > rn N � o � � 199 (381) ..�"'. �.; °�`--' � �� 20 (69) � N � � � 228 (212) � c N � � 590 (826) � �� — 970 (1269) o o � I m �- 500 (649) ,� _ �- z4z �,ZZ, ,� LL � 34 (47) �11�� _ � 460 ��, � � Homestead Rd Homestead d Homestead d 74 (359) � � ��1� 29 (29) � �j �� 284 (238) � — ��1 I I � � 440 (672) —♦ o � 0 968 (1175) —� ° Q � 400 (616) —� NI �� m —� c �� ° 1D 26 m ° � 367 424 —i � �� 135 (217) '� d ,_ ( ) � � ) —� Q � �, � Il Q �ry m N� N � C N � ('' t` 07 r � ' �, I r a N ry Q N 1� u', c� v v � v � � � � p � � �_ 84 (156) � m � � 640 (732) ° � m �� o �— 464 (�95) � a 111�� a �11�� 212 `�,' �1111 �� 956 (528) � 0 Homesteatl Rd NB 280 Ramps � SB 280 Ramps � 130 (209) � ��11� ��t11 523 (496) � 11 I 11� 448 (775) —i c v r� rn"�' 3 (g) �► ui n 219 (434) � ° o N � � 460 (278) � � � ^ � � � � = c in c� � v rn w c� N DJ N Q � �� th n o � � � � � m � � ,� N � 312 (295) � � c Q f— 940(1206) �111�� I� zs6 cs�s, o o � � � o, � o 0 � Stevens Creek Blvd � Y ,��, a � q = �J v 3� � � >� ��t11� ° � � _ � 263 365 �° � � W. Homestead Rd � V ' E. Homestead Road 430 (1130) � � � � 148 (405) � � � � Q o � ProjECt Site `m run .ri � � ° � — ' � � N �+ o, ._ . ._.. . ¢ Avenue � — c� v y c LL m Z KEY: -� > m XX (YY) = AM (PM) Peak � Hour Traffic ° Z Volumes Stevens Creek Boulevard � = Signalized Intersection PW Market Homestead Retail Expansion � MOVEMENT F E�-i �& P F F� S CUMULATIVE WITH PROJECT PEAK-HOUR TURNING TFANS?ORTATION �o�s��TS VOLUMES, LANE GEOMETRIES, AND SIGNAL CONTROLS� December2009 FIGURE 10 SJ09-1111 2-90 Attachment 8 . ,� ��8�� S��.I��`E� profess�onal coneuiti�g arbor�3ts and tree care �� @��i1F�� i �� ^ ^ ° �" t � � ^ � o i� � � � v � 3 �� = � a �3 �'3 G� �,a � H y o 'o $ I a '" b o •° o �.°.�' "✓ � � r. �' � ..�. ;� o F, c�d F U .�. � ' y � �' � a w m � �f � � r � 7? 6� o � 'Y Y � � �� V � �fA Uw �''� E � Ir�' TREE : � a .� � y a � o �� eo h�l i�-� i�.`� : NO. ! TREE NAME � H w � x � � � O � ri x � � � London Plane Tree fl (Platanus acerifolia ) 10.5 30 ` 75% 50% Fair Hi h �a�� Commants: Ivy along lower trunk. London Flane Tree 2 (Platanus aceri olia ) ]0 25 75% 50% Fair High '�dV� Comments: Ivy along ]ower trunk. London Plane Tree �j 3 � (Platanus acerifolia ) 8.5 25 � 75% 50% Fair High ��e Comments: Ivy along lower trunk. London Plane Tree 4 (Plaranus acerifolia ) 7.5 20 75% 50% Fair High SaVe Comments: London Plane Tree 5 (Platanus acerrfolia ) 9.5 25 75% 50% Fair High Comments: Ivy along lower trunk. Red Ironbark 6 (Eucal tus sideraxylon ) 21 35 75% 25% Fair Low �`�� Comments: eanopy encroaches on existing street ]ight. Ivy along iower [runk. Has been significantly reduced in height {or "topped"). Red Ironbark 7 (Euca! r� sideroxylon ) 15 30 50% 50°/a Fair ; Moderate 5��7� Comments: Has sustained a]arge limb failure in past. Ivy along Iower truak. Shame? AsF� f � (Fraxinus uhdei j 2 � 8 � 14% 75% .r'iood Low � �omments: New grovnh. p Fiewering Plam � �, : � (.�' cerasifera ) 5 '; '_ 5 75% 75% �ood iYoderaTe ��'.CT�3'� �o:r_mer.is: �. �:.��. v;��: c'u�R�•i��^�ES:�a�'?��: yt:�s:u:• ,P.-e�areci Got: City o� �;r,verH �iD/�1i'3u^. �i°'N�E� s�erl. �;'G',67F�1'@fl (��': �s@Y:� �. �+�(O1S,'.J '� ?!` � y;�s?!�5:�?Y �, !i'`t'4: 2-91 � �� .�� rrofess�onat consLft�ng arborr.�ts and tree care �i''�� F�tl7�i�l 1 �� G �/�'i�EL� K a � ^ � ° � �, ^ � � 0 0 3 � � ° � � F 3 �'� � �e �.� � �. � o o , '�, o� � f� a � - ° �? ° :,3 � f o � 'J C� ,� ' d v �*' a� w a� E � �� Cj � �� U � � ,L��' o F � ".� � �� 42� �.�'REE � � � �° � �� R�ba � k� NO. TREE NAIVIE [--� , u`� cn x� rn � � O� � x : E� �lr ti� . Flowering PIum z FQ i {Prunuscerasiferaj 4 10 75% 50% Fair Moderate ��v�-' Comments: Flowering Plum i tfl (Prunuscerasi era) 3.5 S 75% 50% � Fair Moderate R�IDO[�� Comments: Flowering Plum 12 (Prurars cerasifera ) 7.5 20 75% 50% Fair Low ��m� Comments: Has a girdling root as trunk's base. Flowering Plum 13 (Prt�nus cerasi era ) 8 25 75°/a 50% Fair Moderate Re�ove Comments: Base of trunk covered by plants and not visible. Flowering Plum 14 (Prumrs cerasifera ) 6.5 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate Re�iOV� Comments: FIowering Plum b5 (Prunuscerasifera) 7.5 15 75% 75% Good Moderate � R�AlIC3VE' Comments: Flowering Plum flE (Prunuscerasifera) 5.5 IS 75% 50% Fair Noderate �Q-'� Comments: ' Flo�vering Plum � fl7 (Prunus ceras:fero. ) 4.5 14 75% 25°/a � Fair L.ow �eDl90�'E' Comments: Structure is comprised of seven leaders that form a wsak attachment. � Flowerir_g Plum ' � :� �� (P cerasifera; 5 i 5 75% � 50% � Fair � iYodetate ,�'�'��'��Q-' �or�m�n:s: J"<``S: Gi"!:'`�i`'!'e��^+9�°e.Cc'G`^�-.r'.s.� .,`' Pre,�ared ��r: �it?� o� C�oertlr.v �om�n. k'��ref��,.. �et�a�r�. !oi"E�F,('G''w'�;�: �{'r2fY:`�`�.�... C�Gl�i�1;,! G ��`d: eSF'F.'i£ai ':u� �y�v' 2-92 ,�� 1��B��t �$��€��.;ER�� proftss�onal corts�;ltin9 arborists and tree ca�e �� G�� y � o � t H � � t r� ,� I o O � �� i Q .� 3 3 � � p � •� � a a� �� c y a o o �� o `" a o� � � � y � ,+� � a � � •= ° o '� ,�i I G � � t`� .. � y � Y o � `� � k �l1 • � �, j Q ' �� tj � �� U � �� G� U��°� '�'AEE � � a � ° � ° � o e��c � ° ° „ 'w ��,, ��.f .� NO. F TREE NAME E-�� c? rr �� O� � v� x � E� W i� , Flowering Plum 14 (Prunus cerasifera ) 2.5 8 75% 25% Fair Low �� Comments: Has a major wound with decay at trunk's base. Flowering Plurr 2(E (Prunusceraszfera) E 4.5 15 100% 25% � Fair Moderate ;�$�ldf!AE�'@ Comments: Structure is comprised of three leaders that form a weak attachment. Flowering Flum �fl (Prunus cerasi era) 4.5 10 50% 25% Poor Low ��o�� Comments: Has sunscald along trunk and a poor structure. Has been overpruned. Flowering Plum ; �2 (Prunus cerasifera ) 1 4 100% 50% Good ' Moderate �P�HR06�@ Comments: New install. It appears to have been planted too deep, and there does not appeaz to be sufficient lateral roat growth. Flowering Plum %3 (Prunus cerasifera) 5.5 IS 75% SQ% Fair � Moderate Comments: Flowering Plum 24 (Prunus cerasifera ) r b.5 20 75% SQ% Fair Moderate �� Comruents: � Flowering Plum t ; �� 5 � (Pn�nus cerasi era ) 6.5 15 i 75% 50% Fair Moderate �omments: Flowenng Flum � � �2etmdv� i6 (Prunus cer�sifera ) b.5 20 75% 50% � Fair Moder�te Comments: F3oti�eri�g Plum • � k7 (Pr�rn:s ceras�era ) � 1 4 j� ] 00% a S�% � �oed Moderate �� `'` � �:,omments: �erv izstai: �Ya' ��a*s to have been �iantec� bo deep. �1�`6: k:C.^sf':��::?9s:at�P,�� wi'..'y.::i`1c?!; Pre�,ared fn^ �Fty af �u,o�r36r�r� �otnr�. :•sv�e�a; . se��.�i. :'',�e�^��~�e�'!�;:: �'ev:�;. E��.�, . 1 �: ^ � :- ,,.�, �- � �,,,.r �.,: �,, �. �r�. i• :, 2-93 . �� Q� ��.�� professianai coer9ult�ng arbc�rsts and tree care � R�� 111�`IB 1�S �F��E'� I�� t � Y � ° � � � ^ ° ° � � 3 , -� � �. 3 � 3 � ca ; ° � +1 L � � O '� $ p,�. �, � t'� ar cd � 0 a y � � '� � �'i, � � w c� �-1 f!! ; � �'�' o �i � o.� b Ct� � i A r� U� � C �� A t�� '� Q� t l t� TREE � �a � � �' e �v -g :n � f!I � P� : NO. TREE NAME H r i v x� rn p �� ri x E- �� Plowering P[um R �� E 2� i (Prunus cerasifera) 8.5 25 50% SO% Fair Low Comrnents: Has sunscald along trunk. Flowering Plum 29 (Prunus cerasifera } 7.5 15 50% 25% Poor Low ��@� Comments: Has a very large wound at trunk's base. ' Flowering Plum 30 (Prunars cerasrfera ) 9.5 20 SQ% 25% Poor � Low �em�o�re Comments: Structure es comprised of two leaders that form a very weak attachrnent. Flowering Plucn 31 (Prunusceras:fera) 5.5 20 75% 50% ' Fair Low �$�@np�`F� Comments: Has sunscald along trunk. Grows with a lean towards the street. Flowering Pium 3B (Prarrius cerasi era ) 6.5 20 75% 25% Fair Low R@t'�OVG Comments: I�as a large wound at ttunk's base. Crrows with a lean inro sidewalk. Flowering P3um 33 (Prunus cerasifera) 5.5 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate R�mp�i'e Comments: Flowering P1um 34 (Pr�rnu,s cerasifera ) 4.5 20 75% � 50% Fair Moderate ' R��= Comments: Has a wound at trunk's base. FIowering Plum � 35 (Prunus cerasifera ) 6.5 25 75% 54% Fair ; Moderate �@�p�y�e Comments: Hzs a woun� at trunk's base. ` Flowerirg Plum ' ? � ; i_ �G � (�runtscera,sifera;� 5 20 75% 50% Fair � Tvlodera�e ��"�+�`�'� �om,��ents: ._.._._. �.`;!g: :r�'�'c^v �:_:�ssE�z�� Q:.,` ��8.w�� Pre,�a�ad �-: Cft,v o� ,�'.;r�¢rtf?o �o�rrra?. Gvre�°o �. :�ef,�G�`. n�"'2( �'' eiF;r: �a�'r'`� :,.. Yes'dP`iv � ,,�+, T �.,� T � � .i,� .`s^.C'i��i�. r� �� 2-94 � ,�� P��QR R.��OLIFt�� rofess4onal consuitiog arbonat= and tre� care �� i`� Y �� 1 � �� C � y O �y i � � ,� � ^ ( Q •r� � � 0 � �� a � c �,, � . o ��o $ •y o � � � a � ., .. �o ° c � � U1 � a � ..`'"'�. (j W � CL U � F �, 'c Qa � Q � II II w � � � � � TREE � � u � � � ° � o � y � i•I �d � i NO. TREE NAiVfE ° o G • � y G � > U � x � � � � �"� w f/� r�i �/ V] v 0� C/] �..i . Evergreen Pear 37 (Pyrars ka��akamii } 10 34 50% 50% Fair Moderate '��e Comments: Has been overpruaed. Has a wound along hunk. E Evergreen Pear � 38 (Pyrus kawakamii } 5.5 20 75% SQ% Fair � Moderate IZ@IIDQ�T� Comments: Crowded growing conditions. Evergreen Peaz 39 {Pyrus kawakamii ) 4 35 50% 50% Fair ; Moderate R�� Comments: Has been overpruned. Fruitless Mulberry 4@ (Morus alba } 9 20 50% 25% Poor Low 1�E'![tO�T@ Comments: There is a very large decay column along its enrire trunk. Fruitless Mulberry 4� (Morus alba ) 9 25 50% 25% Poor Low RG]f90itC Comments: Has a large decay column along its entire trunk. Camphor Tree ' 4� (Cinnamomumcam hora) 10.5 35 100% 50% Good High �� Comments: Has a low-branching structure. Interior has been overthinned. Camphor Tree 43 � {Cinnamom.um camphora) 5.5 15 75% 50% Fair Moderate R�� Comments: Has a nanow canopy due to crowded growing conditions. �amphor Tree � 44 (Cinnamomum cam hora ) 9.5 25 50% 75% Fair �oderate I� •L'ATQS�L Comments: I-Fas a sparse canopy. � Caznphor Tree f � �� iCinnamomum ca;n�hora ) 7 2Q i 100% SQ% # iood Moderate '��'�'� E= �:.orlrne?►ts: . 6�C � �`'�'�. ! ,' ',:i:1F,yu ��"r^. P.•s�a� 9�r: �it� oP �;:��er�ire �om:+3. �evs6�y;�. �e�ar:. i�:'E;�:'EG` :i;�. f . 4�!i3, v?:� Gt�'. •. '..r.BYLt:� i,':. T� :£�>uCi�E:•j,/`c, �,f''`� 2-95 .. �� proFess�onal consult�nc� arbor�st5 and tree care �� {aE �f �I��P'L� 'd ��4��G ^ I ^ � � 1 y i � � o o � � �� ; � � 3 � � y o � -�a j r � o po; � � c} ' , \ �Q a� a s i� � � � � � «� � j � 0 � L � N �' �� O v� ny y F"' � t � � �' � Q '� v � � � �q � w �,' � 6e °.� � � � TREE� ! � �� ' a � i ° c Go � ° o , �`� � �1� NC?. � TREE NAIVtE � F-� w rn x:. �n `. �� r n x' ; FK G� V: . Camphvr Tree � 4( (Cinnamomum camphora ) i 1 20 50% 50% Fair Moderate �a�re Comments: Sparse canopy. Trunk is adjacent to a�ac Be[1 underground vault. F,ondon Plane Tree 47 (Platanus aceri olia ) E 25 75% 75% Good Moderate :��@ Comments: London Plane Tree � 48 (Platanus acerifolia 6.5 20 75% 50% Fair ' 1�foderate �� Comments: London Plane Tree 49 (Platanus aceri olta ) 7.5 25 75% 50% � Fair Moderate �aV� Comments: Fruitless Mulberry 5(F (Morus alba ) 11.5 35 50% 25% Poor � i,ow ReIItQV(' Comments: Has been "pollarded;' which is a pruning method that promotes the rapid growth of weakly attached branches. � Flowering Plurn Sf (Przrnus cerasi era 8 10 106% 25% ; Fair Low ��V� Comments: Graws with a lean. j London Plane Tree � f 52 (Platanus aceri olia 9.5 30 50% 50% ! Fair Moderate S�Q7� Comments: Has a large stub due to the past faiiur� of a limb. i Londor Flane Tree � 53 ° (Platanus ace�zfolia ) 8 � 30 SQ% 50% Fair ; Moderate �� Comments: ; � o�rbardy Poplar w ' t� � � ' � ��,�: 5�? � (PoYUiz:s r� . 'Ita�ica � 5•5 ; G ! 75% 50% ! Fair � '_,ow � �a_ri:ner.�s: ^ p ..: /� �^.. ,� �- • �.,. f . �V'!:'G4 � �J'C�'.�i.'g v.'v:�+C.'V�.''.'.�'.� Ara�aresl:o:;: �it� of ��erti,.o n,aPn�. �re�^, �. �s�L�. �i6+�i�T,:Yx+� ��': ..�i'�'!'�.�i, .. �i��"w G' i`�� e,'c^,:;.6��;.< �, 4y7a; 2-96 • �� 1��+�P� ��CE� professFOnal consult�ng arbonsts ar,d tree care �R�� 9N��T��` � ��.� � i ^ ^ ° �, � � I �' �, o o � � 3 C} i � `� a i � 3 �' 3' g Q ; �.t � o o '� `' � � p o ¢. e � C7 cd `� w „ O L �+ � V 'fl in ,� in C� � a�i F �? Pl} `" C G) � ` A �a � ° ` A� �m Uw �a � f�2�` � TREE f � 2 r,`� � � � � ' � o c � G� � R1 � o . 6� 1-t � ' NO. . TitEE NANE � w v' � x� �� ` p c7 �� E� aa tn London Plane Tree 95 {Platanus acerifo:ia ) 'i 7 25 50°/a 25% Foor Low ��v� Comments: Lombardy Poplar 56 (Po u&rs n. 'Italica') S 20 75% 50% Fair Low $�� Comments� London Piane Tree 57 (Plataners aceri olia } b 25 50% 25°/a Poor Low ��e Comments: Has a low-branching structure. London Plane Tree 58 (Platarrus acerrfo/ia ) 7 35 50% 50% Fair Moderate 52�� Comments: London Piane Tree 59 (Platanus aceri olia ) 8 ZS SU% 50% Fau , Moderate Comments: f London Plane Tree I � � 6Q (Platanus acerifolia ) 7 25 50°/n 50% Fair Moderate Comments: � London Ptane Tree 61 (Platanus acerifolia ) 4.5 i 5 ' S0% 25% Poor Low Sc��Te Comments: Crowded growing conditions have created. a suppressed canopy. � Sitver-Doltaz Gum � ; 6Z (Eucalyptus olyanthemos) i8 30 100% SO% Good � ivioderate • Comments: There is z retaining vrall at hvnk s base (d�wnhiil/parking lot side). ' �.on�o� Flane T'rae ° g �� # (Dl¢tana�� acerifolda ) 18.5 35 50% 50°/a Fair ; c✓!oderate �a�-' �' � Conne�is: T.r��re is � rei�inir,g wzi; ai in�nk's base (do3vnhilUparkir_g ln; sicie}. �f�o: �!�'r^.2J .'".�.^ss?'�"x� ax^�ir ^.rw.^�,C', r!i u^aAFx^.'�r �rs,�ared Eo-: �itv oa rcr�+erlF�r� �orr��n. �e�rs�e :�e�a�. :�: :��r: ra�r?'� `�. ��,b:u�rr .� �� - � c �� ,i�&^•sc^. r F -.,,; f �u' " 2-97 � ,�' � . �� Q''��.�� profess� c ar and tree care �� i�B��f�� t � y I .. , o � 1 � p ,,_, s r. � 0 0 �� 3 i 0 � �, 3 �' � � A E d a +�. , d o ,o ° �_ ° a w` � `� � t a� � ° °� ° � ° � � 4 ''✓ � � � U .� '� � ,� y a � �° a� i�-I PA " .0 4, ° m� � U '�a �'�' � � � R � � � � ii � ri ._ w :_ � �t t� .� TREE � -'�S � �� '� o � o � o � a �! U s � IrtQ. TREE NANiE � w rn 3 x� �n � � O� v� � C-�{ Q� t�F! London Plane Tree E 6�8 (Platanus acerafotia ) 23 35 50% 50% Fair � Ivloderate S��7E Comments: There is a reta:ning wall at trunk's base (downhilUparking lot side). Silver-1?allar Gum f5 ' {Eucaly tus lyanthemos ) 1 i.5 20 100% SO% Good Moderate ��V� Comments: There is a retaining wall at irunk's base (downhilllparking lot side). London Plane Tree 66 (Platanus aceri olia ) 21 40 50°/a 50% � Fair Moderate �ave Comments: There is a retaining wall at trunk's base (dawnhilUparking lot side). Silver-DoUar Gum �7 (Eucal tus ol anthemos } 13.5 20 75% 25% �� Fair Low SdV� Comments: There is a retainir►g wall at trunk's base (downhilUparking Iot side). Has a weak structure. London Plane Tree ; 68 {Platanus acerifolia ) 21.5 35 50% 50% Fair � Moderate S�v� Comments: There is a retaining walI at trunk's base (downhilUparking lot side). Silver-Do11ar Cr�m i 69 (Eucaly tus olyanthemos } 11 8 SO% 25% Poor � Low �av'� Comments: There is a retaining wall at trunk's base (downhilUparking tot side). Has a broken top. London P1ane Tree � 70 (Platanus acerifolia ) 21.5 � 35 50% 50% � �air � High ��E'- Comments: There is a retaining wall at trunk's base (dawnhiiUparking iet side). � ; London Plane Tree � � 7Il (PI'alanus acerifolia ) 24 ; 35 iQ0% 50% C'iood n Hig�i �� Comments: TF.ere is a retzining wall at trunk's base (downhill/parking lot side). t L.onaoa Plane Tree � ' , i ��' (FLatanus acer.'folia J I 2 ', 5 � 75% SO% � Fzir � Nfaderate p��3�G: ^omments: �-owde�. growing canditi�ns �zve creates e supp:�essec �a?:o�y. Cy,•A4(�: 64"�i y'QUS::BJ �i��4t�w� P�rs�a!ed fo^ �ity of �r:i�oertr,^o �om�. ueue��. �e��t. �'Ss�c'R'L •- �6Y`G+i. �$f.�WjF r .^uFG�� ,:��^'i�s. kr.'?f�� 2-98 • � �� .��,��5 p�rQfessECna� aansult�n� arbor�s:s a tr care �� FNVf �/�i'� 1 Li1'�. Y �� t ^ C � �i f, � G ,,� o o '� � .-, r � i a d 3 �' •ri '.:. � 3 �'' 3 a a� .� .i.l y � 'y� o � � o � � e a� RS � � o a '� . � � U .-� I � y � m C� E W G7 rl � G� .�+°�. � C � R� �c q U �m `' ; .1�,,,+' � C� '�' U II '� II �., � -� � � �'Z i3 TR$E ' �� d � � o c�i o Lti � ti,� G! Q) �d � NO. 'FREE NAN[E � w r � ,'7�+ � �� O� cn x E W fl1 . London Plane Tree 73 (Plaranus acerifolia ) 3.5 10 � i5% ; 50% � Fair Moderate � a�e Comments: London Plane Tree 74 (PlaJanus acerifolia ) 3 8 75% 50% Fair ' Moderate ��[ae k Comments: London Plane Tree 75 (Platanus acerifolia ) 4 10 75% 50% Pair Moderate SaVe Comments: London Ptane Tree 76 (Platanus acerifolia ) 2 5 0% 0% Dead Low 5��7� Comments: Tree is dead or nearly dead. London Plane Tree � 77 (Platanus acerifolia ) 2 5 0% 0% Dead Low S�V@ Comments: Tree is dea:t or nearly dead. Londan Plane Tree 78 {Platanars acerifolia ) 4.5 15 75% 75% Good Modetate �'��e Comments: London Piane Tree ?9 (Platam�s acerijolia ) � 5.5 15 75% 50% Fair Moderate S3�J`E? Comments: London Plane Tree R� (Platanus acerifolia ) 6.5 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate � Comments: Lo:�den F�a=se Tree e �: �?.k (Platarr�sacerifo;ia; � 5.5 � 7' � 75% 50% FGir � I�oder2:e �� vorr.r3e�ts: :. a: 8�� t �'�:.,-��<.w� r,'sd£�, �:;:vers,:� P:^�e f�:: Cffy o£ CJp�rtino �omr�. d��s�,p. ue _�;*�7��3y: �a�cP'�. ��<b,t .. �k'� .i�<<�,��: �d, ,"c�''� 2-99 - �� .�Bt�R �E�£��C�S profess�ona! consult�ng arborests and tree ca�e �� [VtiV'�6'�f�� C � � O � n O O � E � � � € '� ^ •�1 :� �, a � 3 � A � � o �,a � � .�o ��g � o �� . � b . � �^ � � '� a o� `�b � �; � q �� '�� ,� �w �'� � tc��. TREE � � .� �a�i � � o � o `� v � � I��d �' � NO. TREE NAME � H rit cn x� �° � C7 � � x E� Re c!a . L.ondon Plane Tree 82 (Platanus acerifolia ) 3 5 75% 50% Fair Moderate �a�� Cornments: London Plane Tree � 83 i (Platanus acerifolia ) � 2.5 5 0% 0% Dead Low ��@�� Commsnts: Tree is dying or dead. London Plane Tree �4 {Platanus aceri olia ) 2 5 0% Q% Dead Low ��V@ Comments: Tree is dying or dead. London Plane Tree 85 (Platarrus acerifolia ) 2 5 Q% 0% Dead Low RP1RQVe Comments: Tree is dying or dead. � London Plane Tree �� {Platanus acerifolia ) 2 5 0% ' Q°/u Dead Low �elqQV� Comments: Tree is dying or dead. � Loodon Piane Tree 87 (Platanus acerifolia ) 3.5 15 50% 50% Fair Moderaie Se'3V@ Comments; London Plane Tree F8 {Platanus acerifalia ) 1 i 30 �5% 54% Fair Moderate �� Ve Comments: � Mixr�osa 4 8Q ; (Albiziajulibrusin } 3, 2.5, 2.5 10 4 75% ; 50% Fair Low I��CICT�@ Comments: Comprised of s�:ckers growing from a common stump. �amnr.or Tree � �' �+ �Ci,�natnomum. camphora j 12 30 ]00% "IS% ^ vood Higti ' ,�`y,3 �om.rnen:s: _n:_�k is 3dj�.cent to ar. ;L*��iergrour_d rau�.. �€c�: s��+�Fy.'-:��^��za`�-��.�t �:iyr,�,�r��. Pre�ared ta-: �ffj� of �;�f,�ertl;,•o ��m�a. �^e�*E�,c. �m��;. :�t iJ^jv: �t3Y:'�'r. ..�5¢•��:! : W ��r�' ei•'f..iT3:;c,� �� ! 2-�00 � � �� o�t�e�s prafess�onai consulLir+� arbonsts and tree care G G�E� ��'��R�' �'IR��..� � 1 c � � o � n, � Vl y � 4 : 1 � � ^ � � � � ^ � .� � � a � � �' 3 g e y � ` � *� � �' ' � � y � •y � '� . f � c� .. '� $ ,� o c a o� i�-{ t!� . � o a� U o.� �,. o G} � � p � b ' U � `�' � : V i`= ., � �U 42 .�.! . TREE � 8� �_ �= F o m� U� Gd R1 NQ. � TREE NAME � � � i '�' ° � ° i p � � � Ei �4 V2 E-a w v� x:. v� :., . Camphor Tree g� (Cinnamomum cam hora ) 9 20 75°/a 75% Good High �"� Comments: Mimosa SB (Albizia 'ulibrissin } 7.5 20 50% 50% Fair Moderate S�Ve Comments: Has decay. Jacaranda �3 (.iacaranda mimosi alia � 4.5 15 100% 50% , Good � Moderate Save Comments: London Plane Tree 94 (Platanus acerifolia ) 7.5 20 75% 50% Fair Eii h Remove Comments: London Plane Tree 15 (Platanus acerifolicr ) 8 20 75% 50% Fair High ��dv� Comments: Raywood Ash , t 96 (Fraxinus o.`Ra ood') 12.5 35 100°/a � 50% � Good Moderate ��Ve Comments; Has a girdling root. Also, a large root from this tree appears to be exploiting the parking lot European White 8irch �� 47 (Betula endula ) 3.5 l, 10 75% 25% Fair ; Low Comments: European White Bi:rh ; t �8 4 (Betulapendula} 4' 10 75% 25% � Fair ; Low ;�e��'� Commer.ts: � Eu.o ea� tiVhite Birch � �_ �� {Betuia�ene�u[a ) � 2.5 : G i 5G% 25% � Foor � i,oti� � �p��` � rcmrr.ents: .J�:'a': �rr'$S'� :``fl!T�$k'°€'�i �r'�.'.t� �;if."�^c'$�F:`� ��e,�arecl�or. �ft;iof�u;�ee�tfr�� nm�. �ser� �i£,�2:"l°.•. 'S?!: �s'8i/5�',. Lr`�£�i.�,�'i'� ci .i Gi �.l�a:�.�ii�°f !�� is`f�y' 2—�01 � � �'� �� i.��J profess�onaE cQnsu!trng arborsts ancf trte care ��G,� �� W ��i� i �� . .-. � o C'. ' �. O � o o �: , b � 3 •� i y 0 � � � a a �' c " " a� ✓ !� i � � � � °_ �'° � ° a" � � � Ti p„� C L, rR FlJ R U � C v '� r,�i o ..��., <`" � � � '� � a �`� �j� '�� f U r �'o �U �1l.�' TRBE � E � Y � � � � � � � �4 1� .N 0 0 , NO. TREE NAME F.�, w� s� r� � b� �' �i � ' C-s �k t!� Shamel Ash fl0� � {Fraxinus undei j 21.5 40 140% 25% Fair Maderate ��aV� Comments: Has likely caused hardscape damage. Shamel Ash ']�1 (Fraxinusuhdei) i 15.5 35 1(TO% 25% Fair Moderate � Comments: Has also likely caused hardscape damage. Shamel Ash d02 ;Frc�ims uhdei 10 20 100°/a 25°/a Fair Moderate RE-'��'V� Comments: Trunk is covered by shrubs and is not visible. Raywood Ash 1Q3 ' (Frcarinus o. 'Raywood') 4.5 15 75% 75% Good , Moderate ' R�IElG3�e Comments: Crape Myrtle 1Q4 (Lagerstroemiaindica) 4 ]0 75% 50% Fair Moderate Remove Comments: Has been topped � Crape Myrtle � �{!5 {La erstroemia indica) 3 8 75°/a SD% Fair Moderate � 1ZFI6PO�C Comments: Has been topped. � Crape My�le � i06 (La erstroemiaindica) 5.5 20 75% 50% Fair Moderete ��'� Comments: The canopy's interior has been significantly pruned. The support stakes are embedded into the irunk (and causing damage�. , Raywood Asr� flfl7 f (FYmcinNs o. 'Raywood') 12 25 75% 50% Fair Moderate ��ffiCZV� Comments: Canopy's interior significantly pruned. ' Raywood Ash ' r �± ��8 (Froxints o. 'Raywaod') _ 30 ; 75% 50% Fair i19o�erate �' ��(�y � r� Commer�ts: Car�opy inie:ior sigr�ificant?y pn:n .jC`fr: �'��LJ'f';fl �:',"��C]:i";y PrPrared �a-: Ctt,v oP!.;u�er#ir,.o Corr��. �e•rs?o�, r�e�� b�ai c2' c�,v: S�av°� :.. ��.��?i '�: ��f a"� ' � R1 �s:.L�u�� s �:; �s � 2-102 • �� lY��Ra �►��.a1[�'�3:� prefess�onal consuiWng arbpngts a�d tree care ��i�:e �f��E� 1 �� i i !�'8�� " � � � !�. ,� O o � � .. I O 3 E -r, � a g ° ��3 �A �� i a��i � '=' ° � ° �� o °,�' � 'J� � / � V � c � � � � o � w � � � � q � � t j � � �G U r ° '�'�' � 42 ►�2 .I-� �r�E � G a � E � � s � � � ( � � a� � � NO. TREE NAME �' �' c. a`�i ° o � o � c E .• oa � k•i-t F u�v� x., �" �c? �� E . Raywood Ash � F Qa (Fraxinres o. 'Raywood') 4 15 75% 75% Good Moderate �� Comments; Raywood Ash � 14� (Fraxinus o.'Ra oon') 6.5 25 75% 50% i Fait � Moderate . RelliC�Ve Comments: Raywood Ash P H fl (Frcaxinus o. 'Raywood') 6.5 25 75°/a 25% Fair Low RP�J�v� Comments: Raywood Ash ➢f� (Fiaxinuso.'Raywood') 4 10 75% 25% Poor Low R�IOVe Comments: Raywood Ash ' F E3 (Frazirars o.'Ra ood') 3 8 75% 75% Good Moderate ' R411��Ve Comments: Crape Myrtle Y�9 (La erstroemia indica ) 6 � 20 75% 75% Good High R@11ROVe Commenis: � Crape Myrtle fiF5 7 (La erstroemia indica} 5.5 20 75% 50% Fair High ��e�� Comments: � Crape Myrtle t , �1� � (Lagerstroemiaindica) i 5.5 15 ; 75% 50% j Fair High �� Comments: , Crape Myrtle [ fi � 1 i Il i � (�agerstroeTnia inclica j � 5.5 20 75% � 50% Fair High ��'`T'�' T �� oxrrr.ents: `v Kii�L 5f}cf�^c�^��Q:t"" _r�3'��2':r. .�r'o3l�Ql:�a':",k ArP��!e�t r�r. �;itN of �;r�s�r��ro �om�, ��e:�^�. ��p�r� !�.'@,{:£'� f.'C` i;,�: �2Y:.�i� ;. �.+£lJi:j/ '�J �:: ;Ew ,;2lb''G3G� ;,�' �_ G:"• i e ' 2-103 • �'� �� profess�cnal ca�rsultyng arbor�sta a�d tree cara �� ^ ^ •° �."i € � s ° � ° � � 3 CZ i o 6 0 3 �' 3 ° o F. `� a�8 o � �' � � � � ' � � ° " o i � � - �✓' I 'I # � U � p � `�" 4) O ,� w � �' � .°� � � � � V � � � V � '� � � � � TREE " � � e � o m � :n � � Gl � NO. TREE NAME � u`� v x� �° b' Z7 ; n � E� � U�2 Crape �yrtie �f� � {Lagerstroemiaindica) 4.5 i5 75% 50% Fa'u Hi�h F�etld�Ve Comments: xaywood Ash � 14emove SI� � {Fraxinuso.'Raywood') i2.5 30 ?5°/a � 50% Fair Moderate , Comments: Raywood Ash ��20 (Fraxinus o.'Ra wood') 10.5 25 75% 50% Fair i Moderate ��fl�� Comments: Ash fl�l (Frazintts s.) 7, 5(3 , 4, 2 25 50% 25% Poor Low Comments: Has been topped. A mulri-trunk tree comprised af stump sprouts. Raywood Ash I i� (Fraxinus o. Ra aod') 14 35 75% 50% Fair Moderate R�IifQVE'. Comments: i Raywood Ash ��23 (Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 4.5 � 25 75% 25% Fair Low j��move �omments: Has a poor structure. Raywood Ash '�Z4 (Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 4.5 14 75% SU% Fair Moderate REliDC'V't? Comments: ; Flowering Plam ➢�� ` Prunus cerast era 4 ' 0 75°/a 25% �� i � .f ) � Fair Low Comments: Has been topped. � F3o:�er�g Ph:;n ?s�� 'Fr•.!nu.s csr�s�ercj � 3.5 ? u 75% 25% �� Fa;, � Low � ��°��'4-' *'r,rri:-ner_�: �-iss �een toppe�. v�rc: k'�r;t? �'„�`r.r�S3e£Q7 �wea; r:;�&':.r„�'u Pa-�e��na!ed a�:>: Citr of ��r�+erffra �arre�-�. ��er"�; .�e� �.c�. :�a�ti.'�c7.�f'ff��:3�: fldYfC �. �i�&�Ji.�✓ ��i �:rLw .i'c a: Gci�',F� 2-104 � �� i�� 3�� professional cQ �9uftin9 a a�!d t aar �f�E� ��@��R� TA�L� ; � o � N fA Fy � 0 0 � � n � '� a �3 �'3 A � � � C � � '° g � ° '� o a' � � � C� �' F y `� � o a' `� .b k�R f p �� U� I 0.1 � U� � �I-�'.,'o �� TftEE. c � a�i y d "o �� k k� tv0. ' TREE I�'AME � � � rn ='' �° �° p c� �� E-t R1r Cd} Flowering Plum � l�7 � Prunus cerasifera ) 4 8 75% 25% � Fair Law ��` Comments: Has been topped. Flowering Plum 12� (Prunuscerasifera) 3.5 8 75% 25% Fair Low R�� Comments: Has been topped. Flowering P1um I29 (Prunus cerasifera ) '7 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate � Comments: Flowering Plum F30 (Prunws cerasi era) 5.5 15 75% 50% Fair � Moderate ��flVe Comments: Flowering Plum l3S (Prttnus cerasi era) 3.5 10 75°/a 50% Fair Moderate r R�IliOV@ Comments: Flowering Plum 132 (Prunus cerasifera ) 4.5 10 75% 25% Fair Low Renaos�e Comments: Has a poor structure. Flowering Plum 133 {Pru.n;rscerasifera) 2.5 ; 50 75% 50% Fair Low �RE?Y��Ve Comments: �rape Nyrtle E ;��9 (Lagerstroemia indica } 3 8 75% ' 25% f Fav Low � R�It10�7E Comments: Has significant t:unk decay. Crape Myrtle I�� I (i,agerstroemia in4'ica j 5 j ZO 75% 75% ; Good I Mod.erafe �� rorn_n��; tts interior'�sas beer_ s:gnificar,.ly pruned. . �.�: r:�,^c� �'a�.�•.�s�a�,�'(�o�c'y �s�s��lwm P: e�a,+�ed G�:r: �Hv of ��,�enino Cam rm. �ev�fc�¢. !�xs �`. ?.�e�3�ne�',�cr: �a��s� L. E.,l� v�� ;� • ,. f°�'�' �` � oi�c a:� G�i£�' 2-105 .� � �RB�� $��5��..i�.�ES proFess�onal cons�tit�� arbarESts and trec care Y 1�a�� FU��E�'��`� f E�� I � f � I � � p � N /t V G � o +. � � 3 .� � � F 3 �, 3 G Q � . �., �� o o •� o � o a � � . � � o L � � � r A C� ''� � '� v c a `° °' N t'R .-. m t`{a r I � Gj �v U� �� U'� �'� C� f�! � TREE NQ. , TREE NAME � �� a � ° o � o � � � � � i��6 � E- w cn x:. cn `. p C? � x E�+ W V! Flowering Plurn F36 {Prumrs cerasifera) 3.5 8 75% 25°/a Fait Low �� Comments: Has been topped. Flowering Plum � S37 (Prarnus cerasifera 3 5 75% 25% Fair Low j��OVe Comments: Has been topped. Flowering Plum 138 (Prunus cerasifera) 4 8 75% 25% Fair ��, �emove Comments: Has been topped. Flowering Plu�; 139 ' (Pnrnus cerasifera) 1 50 100% 75% Good Moderate R�IROV� Comments: I�Iew install. Raywood Ash 44m (Fraxinus o, 'Raywood'} 7.5 I 5 50% 25% Poor � Low �ea��ve Comments: Elas been topped. The support stake is against the tree's tr�nk. Rayv✓ood Ash 1�� (Fraxinuso.'Raywood'} 11 20 SO% ZS% Poor Low R�IIROVe Comments: Has been topped. Raywood Ash 142 ; (Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 4 9 20 50% � 25% � Poar Low j��e Comments: Has been topped. Raywood Ash 343 (Fraxinuso.'Raywood') 8.5 25 � 75% 25% Fair Low ��v� Comments: f-ias beer. overpruned. , Raywood Ash � � ��`A � (rraxinus o. `Aaywood`; � 7.5 I 20 � SQ% 25% Pao* j � ovv ��`�� er.7menis: �ius been tapped. .h.f�£: C "�iII':•��a_�'ti r�Ff: ^ .1�u8:"` i r`'.":�^u Fr: a�ared !`�r: �itv of ��r�erti,: o�am: ra . �ev�s��,�, �e.;zr u. : Da��'s� `... Prs:�;up� r, f`.�G ' . i�, ,`c�`� 2-��6 - �'� ��.��a ��'��'�� `�J professFanal censult�r,g arbor�sts a�td tree care �� EE'��GIi6 f Y.f�� E % � � � r '^'' .^.. p �i _, � i � ` ^ '� � O .--� I � � e6 � 3 p `r� � ,� 3 3 � � ... �+ �, � ti E c e � r � °: � � •� � �0 0 • ° o w � , y � o �, � V.-• � �� ,� "r C a w a `" i S-1 P!1 k Q A �� Cj ffA r� U�ca p .�'� � �12 � TREB � x � � \ � \ '�o � � � � A) � RS NQ. TREE NAME E C W�n ,,� ° �° p V' �� H� C�11 . Crape Myrtle T 45 (Lagerstroemia indica ) 4 10 � 75% 50% Fa'u Moderate Res�ove Comments: The canopy's exterior has reduction cuts (i.e. its height has been somewhat reduaedj. Crape Myrtle 146 (Lagerstroer�ia mdica ) � 5 1Q � 75% 50% Fair Moderate '��o�e Cornments: Has reduction cuts. Crape Myrtle ; fl47 (LagersTroemia indica ) 6 15 75% 75% Good High � Comments: Has reduction cuts. Crape Myrtfe 148 (Lagerstroemia indica ) 5 10 75% 75% Good High Rernave Comments: Has reduction cuts. Raywood Ash &4Q (Fraxinus o.'Raywood'} 10.5 30 75% 50% Fa'u � Moderate � ReI1�pV� Comments: Its height has been reduced. Raywood Ash 15(1 (Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 7.5 2Q 75% 50% Fair � Moderate RfEIQOVC.' Comments: Has reduction cuts. � Raywood Ash ��Sl {Fraxinuso.'Ra ood') 6.5 LS 75°/fl � 50°/a Fair Moderate ��e Comments: Has reduction cnks. Raywood �,sh i '! 5�. (Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 1�J.5 ? 25 ' 75% 50% Fair Moderate �eu��e Comments: Iias been poorly pruned. � ! Rayr .tis�: f ;i � S� � (Fr�r.inus o . 'Raywood`) I ' � �5 � 75% 50% Fair ; iYloderate � ��d[S��ii'G �ommen?s: F�zs been p�orly pruned. ,.�Fn"^: L,'�i`��x� �G>i.�G; iE�u�' e�T.'c'v; vG;;::�"Pl•r� Pre�a�'ed fo?: �fty o! Y:r�erti,�ao �om�a?. ��ree��r. E'�ep�� Qf Q;^c'!:: E'u� i�;�F: �fli/.SGf �. '("dc'�P.3.''�"'„1f �C �i Lu .oR,�'^:;c��,y" a5 fu'i f�.• 2-107 ' � �� .�� rofess�onal consuiting arborists artd trce care �� if �Y�F' t� �1'6 i �� ; .� o � i �, � o o � � 3 Q •r; '�.^.�. >, � �' 3 � Ca y � � .� � •� o �b o ',� o a. � t � c� � o � � i U.�. '� " �''' � 0.i a° c'"i R 1-� iR �s w � u3 " � o .� � e,� � q � � V � � � U � � � � bl tla -�s TREE � � � � � e � � � � � f� G+ RS NQ. iREE NAME � � y n, a�i S � o �° ,:-° an 14 8•t �J H w�n x�. v�� o� �,� E+av� Flowering Plnm ��S4 ` (Pr ceras jera ) 7.5 15 75% 50% Pair Mod: rate '� i Catnments: Plowering P1um �55 � (Praer.us cerasi era) 8.5 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate R2��'aT� Comments: Flowering Plnm � 156 (Prunus ceras:fera ) 8.5 � 15 75% 50% Fair Noderate I�@IlDC=y@ Comments: Flowering Plum fl57 � (Prunus cerasifera) 10 2Q 75% 50% Fair Moderate ��3'e Comments: Fruitless Mulberry Y58 (Morws alba ) 15.5 35 , 75% 25% Fair Low ��'�'�e Comments: Pollarded. Flowering Ptum � ' 154 (Prunus cerasi era ) 1.5 4 50% 25% Poor � Low Re�ove eomments: Top has been removed. Flowering Pium ; t64R (Prurtt�s cerasrfera ) 2.5 8 75% 25% 'r Fair I.aw ��Q�''� Comrnents: Top center has been removed. Flowering Plum �E"s g (Prv.nuscerasifer4J 4.5 ]5 75% 50�/o Fair s Low ��➢�E��T� Cornments: Has an asymmetrical canony. � Flowering Plum ; � [ + �%�i �i�runzrs cerase;er�) 3 � 50% 25% � Poor ; Low ��`� �crr,merts: T�p bro�ce c, •. removee. "�;l.9: 6�r'��h�? P.:!?':^c5.?c'�' �'�Zc^�� i�r.:v�«o �'i 9 �a.�ed r�:-: Lt�r of �:e�er�i,: R :9/li737. .{�QfBiRih"J. „�s�°�4,T,",. �: �r.�;-�,;- �:.r: Gar'� �. �a_�.:;i °�r �' �. ."�r:;�<-�,� �: ,� ��.�a 2-108 � �� f��i �$.��RC�� professtana! cor:s�ft�ng a�borssts ar,cF tree care �� ii'�Y'��0�� L�hi�E�� : ^ o � [ � � �. �' �v �" 0 0 = d s� r. p f � T � 3 3 � � 3 -�; � '� o, a � •� �� o � . � ; i.J �r. .,c o � $ •.. o a, � �, Ry � � I � � ^ � � � � o ° ' ° .b M tt! � � a�i� CjfA � I W U'c� �'o Q}''�' TFtEE � -� .� � � � ° o � � � � � G! Q� !d NO. TREE I�TAME F.�. r � c �°i x° r � � O� v'� � E+ P.� t��J . Fruitless Mulberry EG;? (Niorus alba ) 16.5 ; 50 75% 25% Fair I_,ow , k'@ltiOV� Comments: Pollarded. I-�as very large surface roots that dominate existing planter. ' Flowering Plum T6� ; (Prunus cerasifera ) 10.5 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate , ReRDO�i'� Comrnents: F]owering Plum 165 (Prunus cerasifera ) 10.5 20 75% 25% Fair Low ��OVe Comments: Iias sunscald, weak attachments and heavy limb weight. Flowering Plum g66 (Prunus cerasi era ) 7 15 50% 25% Poor Low Rt?Y1l�ii@ Comments: Has a very large decay column along entire trunk. FruitJess Mulberry ; 1�7 (Morus alba } 2Q 55 75% 25% E Fair ! Low �P�l10�7e Comments: Has been pollarded. There is a fence pole embedded in trunk. Flowering Plum '�68 (Prunus cerasrfera) 7 10 75% 50% Fair Low ReIItOVe Comments: Has sunscald and a wound along trunic. Fruitless Mulberry r�� (lYonrs alba ) I6 40 75% 25% Fair i.ow FcEl�3CZWE Comments: Has been pollarded. Its roots have damaged the surrounding parking lot. F FIower.ng Fli:m ' 17� ` (Prunacs cerusifera ) 8 I S 100% 50% f'roo Moderate !�� Comments: I Flowenng Plur,t f � E7� (PrurzuscerasiPra; j 7 10 f 50% � 5'/� � Focr iaw ��o�.,,°IlC6��'� Corr:�rents: .�t;c: t��6' _ �:�:x:�:;� �2�,,:? �:�;.r Pre�,-�as8d;5�c: �It�rof��aer*.d�:o �9�r!�. �efeF�,�. f��p�r,� aP9 92 "5� �'c'?'lt�Sa �. ��b'�i� �3 u� �,� , �i�;��x:::m�; �,,.m 2-109 � �� t��c�� professional �onsult�ng arL�or�sts and tree care �� LV61S �BVF�� i' ��L� .-. o � s � ^ [ 0 � � � � � ; 3 I •�-1 � a A 3 �3 � c � �� +� � o o � '� � • c o � � � � ° � �� g ' � :: $ " o � � ; � i � c� v ' a.r 'b a, o�, �-t tk ' � � � a w i '_' `a� o . � � �C f i_a � � Cj � � PG U �v ,�' � � �ll �.+ TREE � � � � 3� � � � � :'c � � Gb �L' NO. ! TREE NAP�iE H u � �n �° �° 0 C7 �� , E.ft�e u�2 . Flowering Plum Re��ve 172 ; (Prunuscerasifera) 9 15 75% j 25% Fair Low Comments: Has sunscald. Has sustained the failure of a large limb. Flowering Plum ' — fl73 (Prunus cerasi era ) 8 20 75°/a 50% Fair I Moderate � R47DOV@ Comments: Has sunscald. Japanese Black Pine 174 (Pintisthunber iana) 7.5 SS 75% 25°/a � Fair Low Rern�ove Comments: Is about eight feet Yal1. Its top broke sometime ago, and has resufEed in a weak shvcture. �.a:: dnr�� , o�rre�_;a� r r�� :,�;:� ��,�. P�B�areaf g�: Clt;i af �:r,�srtir•� �om�a. �p�eF��. �; �.rn. :'�'r12EJ�!'�C" :u;f: �e]r:'s,-` �. ��'u'�s�;Y �;' ^` ` y ti - .rn:� T L� : � ... �i4'6.. � 2 _ 1 1 0 MARC H 8, 2010 VICINITY MAP CONTACTS SHEET INDEX � � CL I ENT A1 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN PW Su ermarkets, Inc. � DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN � o � P Phone: 408.258.4977 A3 DESIGN IMAGERY � � L 2001 Gateway Place #220 West Fax: 408.453.2169 A4 PAD 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS m o San Jose, Ca 95110 Contact: Joy Belli � �, �' M i k e S t i g e r s A5 PAD 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS � A6 PAD 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS � WEST HOMESTEAD RD. c�n �sT HonnESTEAO R�. 0 W N E R R E P R E S E N T 1 V E& L EA S I N G AT PAD 4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS C o l l i e rs I n f e rn a t i o n a l Phone: 408.282. 3800 A8 MAJORS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS i-28o 450 W. Santa Clara Streef Fax: 408.283.2538 A9 MAJORS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS San Jose, Ca 95113 Contact: John Machado A10 MAJORS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A11 ENLARGED KEY AREAS Al2 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS m � i, A R C H I T E C T A13 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS a � 8 ° Kennefh Rodrigues & Partners, Inc. Phone: 650.965.0700 A14 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS o � 445 N. Whisman Road, Suite 200 Fax: 650.960.0707 A15 PAD BUILDING FLOOR PLANS StevensCreekBoulevard z ° Mounfain View, Ca 94043 Contact: Kenneth Rodrigues A16 MAJOR 1 FLOOR PLANS A17 MAJORS 2& 3 FLOOR PLANS A18 BUILDING SECTIONS S ITE co►vrRaCrOR A19 TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS �,,,. J K BAKER CONSTRUCTION. Phone: 408.882.0199 A20 PHASING PLAN 2175 Stone Ave. Unit #11 Fax: 408.882.0190 A21 LANDSCAPED AREA CALCULATION Contact: Dwayne Baker San Jose, Ca 95125 C1.0 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN C2.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN C3.0 STORMWATER TREATMENT NOTES & DETAILS � L1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L2 TREE SURVEY K E N N E T H R 0 D R I 0 U E S ! P A R T N E R S I N C 413 NORTN MiM ISYAN �D. S UI TE /200 Y 0 U N T A 1 N V I E W C A ! S 0. f !!. 0 7 0 0 '�` I T L- E . F� � � � � 5,, - w' o ,�; . . �,,, � EXISTING $ � } � � � � �QSTING 2 STO�Y '"� , v : . ., �" "� , EXISTING 1 STORY EXISTING 2 S710RY C(�MMERCIAL �� ' ;< � �" '�� -� '? �: -� s� � �x ' � . ��°'` .: ''�'* �' � ��r � HOUSING a' r � RICULTURAL RESIDENTWI, HOU51N ', ��'� ,�� .. y . � �, �a ., �� . � �; � � �. � ... � - � � �" _ . ;,. � rr .,� : � . � '� b ti� i . «; .�- .� -� -h��' � � � �';r. . . . : , . , „_ R � . � . � ' ' � � . .. . . �ys � o- . , f tg, ��' k r e Y. �' �»n � . . �. �' �a Y"' {��,. .�9.?� y� � .�R '� i ��, • �a,.� �'� .., � " ,� � `� �?s � ' � � �+ � T . rT � � "� . i . � v : rv a .. r. �. R�v :.. - . . ..�y,. . � .. k+ . . � � �� '�� b �.;�� $~ .. � 35��f . .. . . . �,4" ' , N � ' � : .,„.�. � . ._, � � �., � �, � . _ ,a�r � a.��n�.% � � - NEWCITYJIOE'W� ..� . �_ � - ��"�,"�'°�� r ' � � � s �, ,, _ ° � � pyLpN � �` ,� � RE AID SFC�N . ,.. "� �:_ z ,..: � �f: � NEW OIfTDOOFt Pk1�(? , � " � � : �_ _ NEW 810NAL�E PUBIJC ART . „'� "� * ` � , r �� - E H'� M E - E A D R O A D � 510.7�' . . ... �- - � � : _ _ _ _ . • - - � �.w. . �� . __ _ , _ _ _ t. = . , �. � T.,.- . , � . n �, �, � _ " �h ,,. -, =- � ;:-_ �; ..,��, � � c , �µ . , �, .� �. , � „ ... � L ..:- ,S ... . . ..- ,. ? \ . � ::. � . . :,_ � . . . . , � a ' x.� . �: ! a f ..� '�., -.% : + II `�� .: .. : ... .. _ '- i.:s m z . ; i � ��.�. r . . __- _ ... .;, .,.� .� ( , , . .:: � .• . _ I '." I . . .:�: �"� �SR.;.� - ' � .. _� ( I I i I I �: �k . <. � � �,, ,. . N E W PAD 3 �. .,� , N E W - � _ � _— Nevr s►w� � .; � N E W �> � ' _ • _ • • . , : 5,460 S F ' ' ..� ; ; PAD 2 ' oRn�w��rs �osr�o cro s�oEw�tx � � . . :...— . �. ,� ;� , � . � _- Y ` PAD 4 ' " �, ; 6.250 SF — -- � ;; ro r�w �� : � � . � � -- , , _ ' , .- � _ , . �_ . . . �,,� 6,900 SF , � ' �� y � - � ,� � . � ,. t : �, ,.:,-.. � -... . �. Cy,c ,'/� S - � � � I � " .� • • „ • � _ � . ..— � � ' �� -� - � ■ GMJ�IR7 . . . . 'F;.. /_ � � �� ` � � � � � � __ , ;' . . � , �ra� �� _ � _ � � _ � ' � t� � ,�� _ NEW BUILDING � �� e ; _ , , PAD ,. : _ _ . �- rw►s� �osu� � � � � ; • ,� _ i . �_ �� . . . . . ' , -- i �?'� ' ►� 17,340 SF � � � . . . . . . . - -.. .�,.�re� �� `+� .; _ ,� �� , � � `�� . � -�: - � � ro � rrPico� eiosw� -,, r�w M�uw � • '� . . � , � �-�► � � �� - � -- - _ - _ = - . � � - - Q _ _ _ _ _ �+ � �;,� � ; �� f .��. -� �� . .� . t �► � .� - > ; #: .____� . . . . � �.� � °� � `"� °*� �' �; � . . : I � _ -- FtusH � c� . P,w w . �� °�`. ,� Y°'�.- �► `�- � - �+i► . �ir� �ir�`rl �r�l � -'+� °'� - - -- . � � J ; EXISTING r:- , � -,,� � „� � . �� . �. O � � PAD � r.i� � '� � � � r� � � 'w! 'MI � � � � � � � ' 6,144 S F � � ,� � ,� , i � • � � I � � NEw s�ow►aE anoN � : . � _. m � ��' �_ . . � � � . ,.� � � � � � . . � �_ � ..� -,� , � �► o � � . . ; y;. . . . , ; , , = , � _ ' ' ;� , ��:. � ; Y_ �- � � , , O . . . . . . . �� . . ' . . . . . . ` � � . . . .� �' � .� ��► �° ,,,,� � ¢ Z r ,. , � �iri`��i •ir�i1�1 �t. � N ��z Q � ' :• _ ,, �-.-. .'�° I'' ' �w � --- ------- � . . ' . . � � , � � T y Y a-�.--�-� �< ,�r, �� a�xs ��"3`fiF#�==�e-#f°#t fi � 'r '�.-� t ,,��_� I a � � ' � ---�--�€' -- ---- -- ' � � � � . - - � -� � � . . _ . - k -�" � .. r� , LL. - � , � ' E X IST I N G �-�w �-�' �� 'rva�r.u. c� co�w►ts - ; � W � 4 .�: '"� sHOPS i�-+�wE►�r�v�c►, � � EwsnNG � p � � 5,790 SF I � RETAIL '` � � . � . �F • EXISTING EXISTING NEW NEW NEW `;n ' i: i I a; � BUILDING � i � �� MAJOR 5 I MAJOR 4 ' MAJ(3R 3 MAJOR 2 MAJOR 1 � � ��, _•.,� ,� 25,400 SF 20,OOQ SF 31,240 SF 31,240 SF � 48,028 SF 1 � �. � �� ( - : I ; � ,� y , . t f {' .. ' _ � r .. _ __ c� � " y' . f � I i � ,. . � � 4 �� ,�; � _ ;! � . . _ , . , . . , � ;. .. .,;;�.:., . .�„s,.. sr . `? "-, �. .; . - . ..... . _ . . . _ . ' — SCOFE OF WO�K � � . a r � � ,. .,,� . . • � � - � ` � � �'�,,,, I � � , . . Ili,; ,, . �� + , : � � — s � � rp ° I LOADING �'_i- . ' Wt3 -- � � W � c- ' , , „ - — � � -, u � ,,, � � �-^- ,, � � , . ., • ,�:;_ ,� � � � , _ � �:, _ s ,� ° ,>_� •, ; ; , �: � j ,. x --- _ __ � i � . . .'_`-----_ ,��_, �—TYPICJIL COMPACTOR � �------ `�_,r 500' _. ._ _ , �'.�� , '�-----.._. -" "_`�---_� _-"__-� � : — -- � - , � _..,, �.,� ��-��"--- EXISTINC3 LANDSCAPE TO REW�tM- � _------- �; �"> u.: _ � � 2' . .. � �� :-:��}'..�. �.i�. � ,';� - +�._ - .S � v .j5- ��kn ,�� r , �,�� EXISTING 3 8 4 {: � . - � � . . � _ �, � � . � � � ��k STORY HOUSING ,� �� -_ � EXISTING � � Y �, � � < , �'� , � F . � � ., �. � � �, � ; � �, , . , . . • m , �� ar. ��a . � e . , 5�r� . ,;. � ;< S � � � 4STORY � _ �- ��: nti � �" �, a � . s:� �. � `�-;� � � _� _. HOTEL -� � � �� K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 , P1N MARXET/H�MESTEAD RETAIL -- N, � _____._ ; CUPFRTlNO, CALIFORNIA 03. fls. ,o , _ \ oz zz ,o -- -- oz., �., o KFM .E.w�ao�.��E_. �.a.� �LL US TRA T1 VE SI TE PLA N 1 2. 1 . 0 9 � s s r o R v N r N� s r �� R a. a u � r c � a o 0 0 9• 1 5. 0 9 N o ! i H � "= 0 60' 120' 3 fi0' Y O l: ti T A N Y 7 C w C A 6 S 0. 9 6 S. D 7 O 0 � ■■� � � � � � � � , ' W � �—� t ,; � �, ;�� -� ��m � � � � �' � ��. � ** �, � � ,�° � � � �`�..-��.., . � �XISTING � �'` � � . � :. �� .� �"d� � �'`'�� *. ISTING 2 STOI�Y ` } � . EXISTING 2 S RY' �`� .� MMERCIAL `� �,.' � �'" : . ., ' "�;��` �. •« �- � �- �} � h�0�lSlf� , � � �,: ` . ,� ' R � ;� FiOUSIN �: � . � '"�� r �� ;��-. ��;�� . . .,�..x , �.. _ ; ` . � ,.,� �.:, � � � $ ; - ��. � . ALLTURNS EXISTING PROPOSED ;� �� ., , ,� M � r � .� ; ,��. '�!" � 2 -�. �� ` : "�� ;,,�, SIGNAUZED ti �_ _ � , ,� . : . >- � � ' . , �a_ .. �'�. . , � . � A � °' �'`; ��': � ` ,- �;.'�„�. °, , INTERSE�TION ��, ALL TURNS NEW CITY SIDEWALK PER ALL TURNS f � ,:<,;, ., ' A1 � N �� SITE AREA +/-15.029 AC (654,663 SF) +/-15.029 AC (654,663 SF) SIGNALIZED ,�, V , Fin's��ARO INTERSECTION ALL TURNS ., a.. vi�" 4�i� M' � INTERSECTION ": ��'. _ ExiSri pno� i�N ..: � ,-. � .�:, INTERSECTION ��, .�' , � �` ; , . : � ��>, � �: � NEWOUTDOORPATIO TOBEREMOVED NEWSIGNAGE PUBLICART H O M E S T E A D R O A D �� NEWRITEAIDSIGN � ,.� ;.�� ;aH � BUILDING AREA 153 ,000 SF 203 SF PUBLIC ART PYLON , � - -- ----- � ------- e L � a - ,.,, 8 ------- + s2.ss 5,s�s i — -- — — �\ �� _ -----�,- �� , „ ��" '. , �'� F.A.R. 23.4 % 31.1 % � ----- -------- — 140.1 339.58' / � � �r. _ � � M1 . � u i N � W i � � �" i � . . � ,. �. � I 7 __ __ � � . ,•^ . ,�' V �. �. ° � � i = � " � � � ' �� ` # OF STORIES ONE ONE � 1 � � NEW PAD 3 I I NEW 5 I � _ ._ ,. , I � 3 � - � . I i d °' . -� as. - t � EW SHARED ,�*{' r� ■ �■ yq� � � �, i I L�, t� � "" . I � _-.. �:.. ,.,d; � YEVJAVS ; . EXISTING CI�Y,SIDEWALK - � � . . .. _:, _ ' . NEW 5,460 SF � I ss , I rr� _ I 6 250 SF i 6� �� " �= To REMn�r, ! �� MAXIMUM HEIGHT 30 30 PAD 4 $ ' I 4 �oe� � _ I r �?�' � t � 6,900 SF N i ,� � � I � �oo� - I � 1?. , � Y � 5 . . g�: a� PARK N 7 TALLS 1 � Ex�ST�NG = I G 848 STALLS 93 S � 30 ' I � � _ � � �o� 1 I I . �� I I j :• NEW 23 RETAIL "�� ,. � o I I � � I PAD 1 , � BUILDING c . RtGHT IN 8� OUT i UNI-STALL 831 STALLS 772 STALLS I I -- '' � — ��' '� �:,`� d� HANDICAPPED 17 STALLS 21 STALLS ,s ; i o � j 1 17,340 SF t „�. `�. � . �.� EXISTING GTY SIDEWALK � - 3 � �� ' TO REMAIN TYPICAL BIOSWALEI c� NEW MEDUW � _ + ,. �= s` 2 8 �\ ,� � � i 14 _ 1z 162-� 4, r �, �,��y,�s�..,� ��, � :� , PARKING RATIO 5.5 STALLS / 1000 SF 3.89 STALLS / 1000 SF _ _ � ' . Y� � _ ■ NEW PEDG�TRIAN .. � � -- ----- I ---- —� � w �\ `o I �7 ,;`' 4 .L� � a � ` ---- � ' He SURE >�� ; HOURS OF OPERATION 7 AM TO 11 PM 6 AM TO 11 PM � • 4IA1 I I 5/A1 � W �� AY � - -� - - - - '- - -� - - -�u9- / � FLUSH CURB CONC. PAD w � y � � ;? 24 HOU RS - RITE AI D � � — J � EXISTING s e �' �a� z � z � �s� �s� � ; I I � � � � '"�° �� pqp � o s I 0' "�"�- USE RETAIL RETAIL �a 6,144 SF . � ,. F _ I I � I N � m 8 � NEW SIGNAGE PYLON m r`, » • •� 2 �. r ZONING DESIGNATION P/CG 8� CG-rg P/CG 8� CGrg �a �a �a �a �a ia �a �a �3 i � �3■ �s is �s �s 30 30 ■zs � a s RIGHT IN 8� OUT � 9 ■ — } Q (MIXED USE PD AND (MIXED USE PD AND (,) 3z� sa� e� ts� 2s �s� s� �s� 2s� 3s� 2s� ao� 2s• ss� zs aa� o r 2d� 3s� 2a� ss� 2a� 3s� 2a� 2 3s� 2r za� ss� 2a� a 2a� s� za� 3s� 2s� tE�' o �; � GENERAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY) GENERAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY) Z -- —" —— ----- — m I j � N Y, E • � • , � � , , , � $ � � � — — — —, — ,.,— , —. -,: ,' a Z u: � _ ��'' , , r ; _ � �- " :s GENERAL PLAN Commercial/Residential Commercial/Residential � � , � � � - ' � � - - -- =- -- ¢ � � �� ; �, ' � ��. � � � � TYPICAL C CORRALS � � EXISTING EWARCAD ��, ''� N T t : w� �, . PAVING AREA 420,908 SF ( 64.3 %) 340,602 SF ( 52.1 %) I EW ENTRY ARCH / 4 3 \ EXISTING PARCEL LINE TO LUDED � �� SHOPS A11 A11 � BE REMOVED OTAL) �C� EXISTING �� -� � �.4" � � 5,790 SF � - ��°"' RETAI� ' �;� : o- `` � LANDSCAPE AND 80,755 SF ( 12.3 %) 110,269 SF ( 16.8 %) � EXISTING EXISTING NEW NEW NEW �' BUILDING �, � � i HARDSCAPE AREA MAJOR 5 MAJOR 4 MAJ�R 3 MAJOR 2 MAJOR 1 �� 25,400 SF 20,000 SF 31,240 SF 31,240 SF 48,028 SF '� — �.� � �` W� 3 2 � ' � � _ � � � i,� � -:a � I � � �� .t� � � � 4 i � ,�� °� r��: � ' '� �� Y TRASH ENCLOSURE KEY 8 4 ; _ � � ,�: � _ � ` �so� �sa zsr � � 1 '� � , � � I I '� LOADIN �� _,_ L ADIN LOADING �� SCOPE OF WORKLIMIT I P RIGHT IN & OU �'. � TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 1 _ � -- r�'� ` �� - - --- 9 � � � . � r 2 3 I� � — � . �, � � �• ° � : -. :; ��.� �� . „ -,,; ., < � � � _ , `�--�x,sTiNGPARCE�urvE � x �.� TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 2 . �.+- : - -;.. ' v .' ' �'% . , _? ' ., -e, �„3' ' � � _ :.Y�' 'e , 'iF,:. . � . . . ' a'w+ �. ❑ .. �. ' � �, � � � , y '. � +� . 3a - :�e� � _. .:�- .+ . ,._ ' �� C. � °#.� .. ^�� - - - - t ;_: � " ' � . , - - . ;. . _ . - — ,. z ,. : -: �: ,� �' .,�� a :_s.�: �., .. ,,;, 3� •�� , y .. ��.� r.r�. .< � ' _ - ..�. t° �.s. � � � "��- � � n . ... ..��5' .,. �� s�. «: �': '�. �..� �. �� .� � � ��s � � � .. � � �� . � � j ..,, , ^�. ..... .� ��;. ._ _ �;>.�. , n� N � x , �„� ' ... 4 i � � __ . .. .. ' � : � . � 'TR�,SHTRUCK � � �; �a2.52�',- �,„'� � EXIS7INGG'�OMPACTOR ` TYPICAL��MPACTOR } �• � � �°"+ 500' ' CONCRE��P '�� TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 3 � � TURNING RADIUS �-� � TRASH E�CLO E � 3. � � �, � :- ' ,. d �`. µ . � : � s �' � �° � , EXlSTING IJWDSCAPING AJ�� _ - _ _ . ,, �s ., � _ W f' ,: � _ "�' e � ;: ;� . : � To Rer,nAiN �-T_ .� ¢• f P ,. ; K � �` , � ��; 4❑ TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 4 � � � � _� � ; � � 4 .. r . _. � �, � : � �� , > � � �.. � k+ E7�ISTING 3 & 4 °� " �� _ � � � � *� � �� '� x y , -; � r -,. ; . _ „ , ,;. - .'" s , � EXISTING . . � STORY HOUSING u � .�. :��; � �� 5❑ TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 5 . � � �� . � r . � ; � . � . , 4-STORY � � � ' ��' , � . � . - , �. , . .. 6 • a :; � � � 2 ,� � , ,. r . �> _ � �. ti �, P ,o�, � � � , p �.� _ , �� , � .� � e . _., .,�... HQ�'EL;� � � � �� '� NOTE: FOR ALL TRASH ENCLSOURE DETAILS SEE SHEET A19 K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET/HOME TEAD RETAIL N � S CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 0 3. 1 2. 1 0 0 2. 1 0. 1 0 KENNETH RODRIGUES t PARTNEpS �M� D 1 M E N S I 0 N E D S I T E P L A N - ' 2 ' 8• O 9 0 9. 1 5. 0 9 N 0 R i H 1'=60'-0' � 4 5 N O R T N W H I S Y A N R D. 5 U 1 T E � 2 0 0 0 s�� 20� � 8�� M 0 U N T A 1 N V 1 E W C A 6 S 0. f 6 S. 0 7 0 0 � � ■ � � � � � � –- — M _ � � � � , . ....: �. .: . � P ' �:'•. ... : , �_ 6Y ..` _ . . � � . . . ...., '-.'",.f ' �h4� '�:,. �'.: Fi ` i .! ��"- � �YCW � f � _ t - Y . . :: s:v'_ . . : . � _ . : � . .. . ..� '' ' ._ Y m; r . . . � u�. ' ,. �- _.. . ..�:�..�. i . . � , y A . u � " •, : a: . . -��.. . _� .. . ;,_ � rytl � . � . ._ .. : '. . r. � . . - .. - - _ � ' "� - i � ,5, .,;t . _, :,�...�.� ,. �. .� � .., •;,�.. ;:� ' � � i�: � . [_. �. . �, . _..,.- ' p*�.� i l�: � .:�.� . .. ..... z �.. KK ' .,.._. ��.. . :.`� . � ... .,: .., ..'.: �,-:�: ,- ',, :� - ' � w�`,.' a - �. _ { .. "�y -� ��., .. . � . . :. ". - �,.., - .s«. � `� V . .. _ ,. ..,,. _ - .: . . . � � � , . .. s �� .- � �.; „�. � .- � , . ' _ .. ; t .. ,.:�' _ Y' .. . i �. . � ") . _ �,_ .�` � � � . , , ' �� 1 � � ,,. . . �'- ,, . � .�.; . � ` � , ; ,: _ � v�. °- � . .- . �, � �,` �� _. � , �' e �.-;. - �� a. i t. j � _ � �-a �u � ; � :�3. ; � , � • , � , �, " � , � � � � . , . _ �' ,. . :�.�. � � .� �. � .�: . _a.: - � .- � .. � 6 �� • �.� i;� 3 �' �$� � � � ,< + ' . _ . . . � . : * �• , � .� . ��.. , � ,' , , ..� .. , , ; u- � _ .. ,• � , "� , :s.�� n " -: . . �., .. :__ �. _ � _ ;; � . , ! � i , � � � ' ':_ ; ` � '�r� - � `. � ,- k .. r:.. ,. . � . i a:� . _ . .. . � . .. : _ , .,. ,z _ n. t zoi '� � , , : � . I ,. �.:x =' ��" '. , �� ,. .. _ . ,., . ;�: __ � . .� . . �.. � ,. . � ,� . .� ., �:s -F:. - p - : .'.� • ._" .:. . .. ,. . � �y � .c; . �- .- ,..� -..._. ., "� . 3 n k .� 9� y } _ � ..��.. . .._ ; 3. ... �. � 6 � � �' �` .. .. � ,:.-�� $. _ � �� ` +� ._.:: � � -�. .. x S ., �. .,.. .� _ .z, ;,: � �.s . � < a . }r _ - , . m . , � � � � .�i � �� R � �` :. - , . .� K . .�� .a :. -: . . :... ; 5..,��. �i � ..:... "' �-.. '. 5,�-. . - _ .. _. . . a1�►� ',��`. �y � � ,s ' � i . . ..., ,� s;� -�� .t . . . �- .. - .,. �se_.�:. ,�. .....-. .^,.-... �s:.._ . x .� . ... �.." .a � � � r ,. ,.. ..,. . . . �..:..� ; _." .. r -- .-. .«� �. . , . � , ... � . . . �.� "_ -� °�� -��:. � , ; *�r .. - . . .. � .,.,:_.. . . _ . � , �. �., : i . -.�,- - ��, �«E>..-� .�. . , ,_ � .. « .,,� , �. .:�..� � .z _., ,, .:. �� . � ...,.., . .,,.. . . , ,� _� .. . �. �'��,.> � . .. . � . ._.._ . �� . - .. .. � - - �"�..: , —___ _r- - - _.-- -- __--- __._'::..__ _ , , = k#F. „w «. i '' - .... 1_ ,_.,..., , +�._ ; . +s '- . , �. .: . -_. . :- _ ,; , , -�... � ': ,. , .._. �. 6 .,_ _r_ y: � :e� ',�, "" �, ;- • _._.. , ... r . � ,. :.r _ < . �� , - �...t� - F t , ��F .. p �� ' `��`.� , .�. ' � . , , . : , -�� ` � ��{��"... � i ��. . � _ .� na».r-� ;,. " � � � "; � =�� j ^� . .,. .� o. g -� � �� g „ - i tl . , ,� , € � � �;,� � � �:�.,: �` �'' � ,°< . •; _ ` . _ L � � , > °,,,;,, > .: , _ �� a �.,_.;s y a � ....._.�;.... .� . . �� -3. ..�awwo. .- �,... . P .. - n ,.;: '�d ; . . .., . 4 � � �., ., . �: �F . ; •; � . , � � < , ;: ��. ` . ='�� 4: � � � � � ._ . _.,.. ; '; ., n , , _ , _ v � . o ;�„ • : �w. h.. � _ - � „ � , ,. ,. �.. . q, � . �. � - ° , � � € w ! � K' a� , r � � � :._ � - : � " E ' � � t� >� � � � � , , ..� R , �, ,: , ��- �° ° k � �, __ �;� . �� , ' � E . ,,. . . '� t ��' , � �:. � _ : .,_ ,. . ,. ��:: �; ° �� ,.. ., : � ,; l' ...� � ,� � ,az � � �� ;: _ , �� .� -._ ,.. � . �, , r < 'y . f�,� �,, . � _ .�~,. ,� _ ;� a _ x� �; �: ; � - , .. . ,. ; . -�� ' .s. , - �� - 'ht * . .,, ;.. , . ,. �..a� r.>. "...• . .' °, _ "_ ,, `�-� ��. �: � '�e ' .,�. . , < .. »r' . � a, s , °„ � ��` , � .v j, , p . ` . Z � . . .. - � '� ��';.. � _ P .�: ::. ��.� . 3..� . . . : : s _ _ - - � ' � � 3: . . � i.,. � '. . -, dr�. ��:: `� �'t.�: . : .@. .... � ... �„ � " - . S , m `:4 ^' � � ✓ � �tg ;�; . . . '� :. � �.-. r .,_ _ ' � �`-� .a y J ��$ ;� . �:: .;� :. . tir ¢, � F � t � ��i. �r�. . -.. �-..,.,'� ; _�� ,_... i' _ _ r : .. p.... . P�1.. - . - t .� ' . s � - _ .� �� , .. �' ' �. 4 °.i:.. . '.x . `. '. .. �' , r �� - ��-tilis : &� �: a Y *n�'J¢' l. - �',��#�y . . . _..- �. ' , .. . �t . . . • a .} . '- . '�:,� A�� . ,, .A f�, � �. . I _ _ ,a "ti .,,,.,� �—.�-_ .._.- . ., ,y�' y.. . � .;, f „��... , , y, i s ... .,� ,. _� ^ �K. __ � . a _ „ . �.•� ,. r � * ` ,.... .. '� k :. .. 4 °' ,. .. ` '- i. � : _ _. a. -.; , ,e r . : h � .� "�. „ , .'F ` � ' '� F - #� �" ��. . . . � , .,. . i _ . . t . . ^ 4 • y 1 , �,. r � . a _ m . r .. �`a �. �9w,. , y' $w ,� r , . 1.� . . ..�s . � _ T�a� ��c` � �,: �� ,: �. � , __ . �. :� ' ;.'` � \ � Y' !�� r e ,�.,r- � n .. �.. . , � ,. � ,�. � �+r'F�a°� �;� "'# � ", .:.. i�+. ...- - � � , . � _ P � ._N �, µ . . . ,� , .. ;4 � .. . �':. - �ryk �_ � � '�r � , . .. �.._ �� ,`y�' �•. : ,-�� M _:.i 1' � �i' r.I . �. .. .� � a�.,� � xk -- . F� � . , o- � 0 -, + ... _... _.-.' ' ' 1 � � . e � / # .; : ��ti �' f . � .. p. � _ . _ �' * � � ,� ; q . . �, . : ,.. -�-�,.. ... � ; . . ��., � ' � ' � � `` - . > "_ . �, �� - _ -� ' _ � �, - _ � � . ; ° � . � s'.: .� r "�- � w ,, _ �._ . . � .. :; �s- , �:�._ �� .,. .. s �:,;� ... .�.. �`�'�'7� _,,, - - a � ..� . .� � y .� .. ��# :: . .- , - � . �a, : ' 1 : � � _" `� 3 � � � :3 ` �.-.«d - k .,.� . , . � +ti w � „ �., b ,�,� � � _ _, �: , , �� - + � -'i } ' ` , ;,, .� .�` I _ - � . , �„ , ... , � �. � ,�3- .s._ - .. .�� i �:�_, �. . �, : � - , _ ; _ �, �s�. , � , Y . • . '"°- ;� � . . �, < .: � . , .�.. . �°` � _ . �.. , . , : „ , . .. . � - „- - ,, . , . ��. , , • .. �. - � II . =' � = t . � , _. ., „ � � � " � � . ; _ . . - .� . y� � � �, . -- m `- - - � .. ' r�..-.�. - ; .: F _ r . � j . e � d ' yyk i�k � . .. . � ,: ; � � A � .. 4 '+�, , °�� ,� �� , :,� . _,. - : . e . � . F _ - _ _ _. _ _ - -- - _ :_ ' � � � � �. ''� � �� ..... _ _ . - �c t .,. � , s.r. .� §_ - - _- -.:,. � . .� f � - �r � _ � ',�� }' i � • ' .,�,<, ��`'�a ' " ' - � ,.`� - T[ . �. _ e . _ �� f , „ .. �1 ' u �� , � " . }� � ` � ., •,� ' � } - .t �'' a�, ,�- .;� ��,r� y .� = ' .,�,�_ ¢ ,� � �; . . �a-ta-3 `" " �s� ` � d g . w ,...' e _ a . ' 'y � ' {M � � k _ � ; , � . _.. . . . :� µa � � ...�..... ��':� �, p � r -�stFv = _ . �. r -., � � . rz.m1+ _ , � . " � ; ..-.. _ . �' _� � " � ., , - •.. a.��s�.a y . - �� ,,. '� ' ;. , . ; ' '#' _ ; �. _ „ � ' < � , �[ F � , : �' '.. � � - ° � '� f ' . � �� I., r. . .. .. .. . � � . .. �� F� �,�. '. „ � � �:_.:.. � �� . t „ m „ " - - �.t � ��;<,�_ - - - - -,�::i ::, - ,_.. , � < �a.. _ .:...- ... �; ` -. _ : �- G ,. ,. ..o „> �. _. ,� .:..�� ;,. '.. _ �,`. �,��' �,' - _ - . � �. � _ _ � ._. 5 -w'.�". ._'u.< . ... .. ..- � � � ,� "` .t _ � �. r := ' .._: � .. ::. � ; . -� �. .. � x = - �, � '�;�.' . - s �.� . 2 ;. � . .. � , ... .. _ . . „ w � . -.. �, � . � .,.�• '��'=r' '+.��y3t°�, -. � .. . . . . .. � -- s . �F � . . . � . '�� - � - . . � .,. '� ` :� �f:.;ye' `.+-"'°:� :y + �� ' � ' . � � ' . � .._ ..,._ . . , -� - _ . . ° E. .. _ �� , � . . v.. ,_' �.-�_. -.�...-a� _ �. z.w. . .. ,:,� � _:: �` •� ..� � . t„�� s '�+�� -- ' . s �` _ ;.i �� .. i � n ��, - � .. : � . . .�.._. _� . . . - _ _ _ �� , � . � ..��.F � �.._- . � ; . ....: .... �- .� ' ..�_,.-. :� , . -. .s. � � . 9 ; ..�,.:�� ._,� `- .. ... � - . .�, a, � g �::.�}• - � - - .�� t _::. � ... :.: - .W ..�.. �._ J is7b�...: �. , , �. .- ..-..ar.�-cad.��. . .. ...,.._.:, � . :_` -:> ;t: . _ � _ 3w . a .�d � .. _ ,- -: • ��,;t _: ..,. ,� -- .. ,r . : �. , , ..� �: � � . ,��.. Y a E • .� t -'�? �. . . . -. .� , -- ., iM1., "�. 0 � � .t ' :. �.i - .. '�'.�; . x F �,.� '" .,:' . 4. . . __ � � f:: u ,:,�. o � v _.. �,.� � a ='�-:.�.._ - -. �. . . . + � � �, r 'ti ,`,:., � �,� 'K e.r' � - z ' :�'' .. . ><. 1 ,. � ��°"'°�p _-.�- , . ' Q ° .. � ., ` �' ' . � . �' _� € . ' � � • ,!t . _ s /�� . ' . � � � ° � �� ` � - i�� ,,�, � u ; . � y �. - — — - � � _ � _" . �: � : � . ;, � � w�,, :; ,o t -# �F'P'.. ,<, . : +r �'��•�; - �� , � �, �-: -_.- .,_. ,.. _ u , �"� - ":;�� . � �F`.,�..3 � z .y, g�•� -��'- *t,�. � _ �s " ° . _ _ a _ M �.� w:: t._' -. 4. ' .,.: .. .. -.� , �z ,.. :. _ , � -� -. � 4 .' _ . • � � �r .. � � ' u � . ��i � �+ '� e, � q� € � +� y' ,` � '.' 3 - ` t' � k. �` H �' ��'F4 _ � � . _ � .. � .` .� - < ,, � . . , � � � N , � t , r � „ . , ° - ` � _ �' �. � ._ -.-... � . , _� v i' ... ,, � �� 4 � f ��- �.; - I .. � i' ' � ..• o_ £ . :_t;�.. � - ,. e -+x . .. - � � � _ _ ... � � _. * � �" i►.' �� aF � � �i . a r. � S �' - . ...� � , �+ �„i'3� o - _ �' -�, " � # a "�y 'a..f �, } � � % _- _-__.... _:_:._' � L.�' ` : .... _ � r � .. . `: t: R..� : }....�,w-.�. -:. � A.. s, . ° k �. , _ . � �-, \ . _ , :. _. ' '• ,....,.�k :'�= � .. . . r:�� .. _ ...:_ �� _ _ _ � ' . e ,� ti , �" '� h� � � �. r �p2 ,3:.}. ^. � _ ,_. , � � � � � �?_ ,. �.� -.-:, � 4. .�� .��. � � .. , ; � ,. � . ,,: n �. ' �: -c ' _ - . r � +wa' . s .. ' � _. _' : � � . , • . 3 '' , .�.� ` ° . ��' ' � � �� 4.... f' •• �4..�. .� , ,, r: '.r .ac"�, .'-�..' . ¢.��[ �� . .b.. r' � ..:� � � , �� i � . � _ � ' .. - . . 1 - .'�. . . d., �� _ ' , 3� _ s � � , , c y Y M ' � :. � �...a._. ...,., ..._.,� a� .�°`'�'�. ' � � .. � a ; o- „- . ;�-�"� �.. � u � - �: � � � w ,� ,� a .. - q, ..,vc . �. _ .,. a,� � �' y , ' ,. . � _.` �. a � � �� _ •�„�n, _ :. .,, . . � p �. .� �s� � g . r � a . , �: �, , , y } , ; . m� Y � . � , „+� . + � r �s � iA �d �-� �t . �n �' � m a � ( ` c '� ' �' .t .. . � . . . - _ ....^ �� e � � i * "fi"'p .. ^+�� _ � , , . , r . _ `� ��. ; �� . . I � ; � �. , , ., � . � * �` �- � „ '� ��, � `'�'� �' € `. a �`�` ' . . . *� ` , . ,� . . . �� - . .. � , : �. � g _ � I �n; •.`cp ; �.:� �: " �` ,��'�� ' � .� ° ;. � '� � ��"�`� ��`� +` f � ' ' � ' ° ' � e � . g �� * '�'' .;„ , r : � � �� .._ ,. . : „� '" " , I .� .: � . G �"� ? : .i J . � ' �. . �• -,. � :; . _.. ' f � m .. ; �y.f . ,�':.,: ��:�: . . � i °.' ' .. T. �. ... -;. . ..:'_ �. � � - � ��• -..� . "" ,} �-: . . pF "f _ Y' y' . _ , ; . ,_ E � � •. '� t . � � � ; �� w �� q Y � � 2»mw, � =y�� 3r'1� � { _ . _ ..'� �`-:�. ,,� ' ' . � �.: 3 , . _ '_ �g w ,.. ; : � . � , . . ..:- q� • -'.. _.. �- - � r:� �� , � • � . .�� .� ., � � �.'� -� i �*' . �� a 'Gra' . � � � , � � , . .. . .; ,; �� , - , y t� � �t'�� # � � . .. . 4 '� = � ' �°�- �� . � �. ..� :. . _.` ` � �; ,'� ? �"� �., ' - :i'i.' � � _. "" ' _ �' �. � � § -�'-- s, . � � . .., g . -*(�... . w� . � ; . �.. . . . . .e.g., � : i, . _ .. � _. .,. ... . . ... ,r _. ,I +. , e J . �� . ��.s ... R �:. T � - . . ... . �r. .. # � ,.�, � .. a . ', .�,.�� .,. . - ., �. _ ..� � .; � .• . ,:a , , s :. ,.'� ��; .. .M F . � - � �t +" . . . .� , , ..��.,. . . � , +� _ �a� , �. ,;'... y ,. , :. * .... _ . .. .,, . ., 5. _.�;.. �;:_:., -.. , _: . � ;b _, ��• ,. :. . . . . �' .. 4 ' .' '� . .. , - .,, .-�:� � �� ,. .-._- -,� �_ ... .., . .. � _ . ....- �. _ �.<. ��,"Y. _,..- .,:. -- .� ".; � 1 =_ - ,.. �._:. ::`d _.. .,µ�e.b�.w.�..w; 4 �. .,�',�,x. _ ,. �j � _ .. , . , .: - . s .:. qa ., ,�.. . .� •' .`T a,�. ,� F --. � ... , � . ,:,. .._..�. ��e. _,... . , ,. � � �?: � � r� . �=� � -, ; ._ '� .. y�,� �' .., : ��. � .n _ .,.. � 1�� _. ,. ,:, z .. .�;��.. .. IF. . .. .. -'. . �a.� . L*"' �._.. ,__.� i s ...: :. � � .� . M.•'.�. F _��._ _'. , �� v � :.. � .'�` . . . : ' �� - � � } ��::? .. . . . � ' �. . , .. •. . �. r . . d � . . ,.< <� 3 F .. �. '�' i i/']l.d - t `� d : s " . : �.__ �� .. '� ' � ` : .. � # ` _ '� . . "R �.. �� ' . ..i . . �� ` n :�.� ' ' .� �, , • � N. t , ^-_. < k :.�' ,.. - �- , ._ . s �„ M : ,. .: ..: ' !� _ @r.,�� ... }t:'. < y� �,�r r - � a . ,�. - � � " ' . � `1 . .« F . ..... � � � � . � . , - _ ; , ,,.. .. : � :._. ;;,. „ , � ° -" r r__.- � ..- ;- �:�F_ '4 . 1 ; -�u« ,.. . ; :�: .r ,.,,; .4,.� a: -- ��'�.'��`. � � � ,��-1 ,�. ..�,`_,,... � � . .' � . , ��.t„ . �- : . # .:�: - �. -- � - _. - �, �'�we - �� .�� "„� � 1 �.... ,: . T . �a.r . -..:_ _ ._-.. ,. s �aY ..r.,.._ f. � � .. � ., _ .. ._' :., . . ._;-.� _. .... -,.t� � ,. _ .��.. �� - - . "� ' _ . � , _ .. ,�„�.-, . .-�..� � -.:_. ... ., ,�... � . :;� ,.,.,. .t�_. i. .� . , . .� : ._: ;. � 4 ,.. ''.+ . v � � �..... � �F ,.� , �.,. �� . ,,- .. �,... z, � , , ._rY _ . , '�, . i' _ a ., ,: . �.-�"� �.. - ' . _ a. >,. .. = ., , f .. :'_ - _ . � , . ,"� ` � ..,:.. ,. - .....;. - � -. e. t', � - --�- -'�`_ , ��_�� , �. ,. ... ... ,� -. "�. ; .a ; ... I "� � _ -_ :� , £:'�,;?,. . . � � , , _ ., � �, � _-__ .,.: � �, , �. ,r,. : � , > � � x: r a _: °Wr , . .a� . _ ,_ : _ , , . . ,,,,, . . . , � . _ r � •-'_ � r w . _ � �� :.�-... ik , • . . �. ' _ � �' €� ,.,_ Y.: ,. , , � � � t � ., , .�; . � , ;- � .. - , . �_ , .'- _. ,. '� . ,_, . __:. _,_ r :� , , : E , ., l �`w� - . . . t � �. . � . , _ '; : �._ . �. 3 _.�` • .,�i, � � � � , ... �;� . . �- _:°�.,..� _,..,. 3� . ,a� � _� . . �'. . , - . �a� �:'..,, . ..� .: #�.: a. � ,s� :,:�.: s .:�.-,. �. .�.. :_ . _ _ ___- y !�� ' .. • �"'��E! '�. ,. . _ �= ., . . :. �:, -:.`- ... ', ,. �:. .:. "�� ;-- { �€ � . . , � ' ,�` � i 'fi� :;:� ..Y.r,. �`�.. .- . , .:- . . � .: � y �_ »; . „, .. -. _?y : � ' . . . ,'. � �N , ,.: �. ' "�-... .'� � � F� { _." ' ��< .. � ' ,,� � . �� :�.� ' � ... �:,=.. + �`a�p'i � � ,5. . { ., �,. �k�`y .. . � � � ,�,,: �, ti I� , . �y��-� ' _ _ �._ :: "' , c `b�! ,> ��" � v� �. ' ' ,�� e:-- �. " ' .r.' ._ � ,. . ,. �. _ . ., _ ' , : � ��. ..� _ `e '4: �,�..^�' t �t � , *a', `� �.�¢�' s it=":" '�f . « _, ':.x : . . � Y : a . g� , . y« �' . �. _ . . . . � " w. '�" � c � � �. : . .. . - . , _.. '..- ._ , �++ -r : ...��.. .. ' � : ;.. - _ ��r . . - . ; � �. '- �, ,,;�• _s� .'� -,. � . �� . . ,,. . .. _.-- . - ; �;:. " ` ., ,. � ° , . } •;, _. � , � ti � y � . : „ �• �: ; ".; .. , ��1�� e �,� f ♦ � +� �^ '� � - .� . . i z , t � � . �. _ � •�. : . � a , . 9 . , � �., I ,�: „� .,� � , �r+'. ,. , . ,- � . ; , , , .•. _ �_> , ��+ �' ' � � _� , . �. � � � . 'T__.. . k �� _ . _ ti. ( : �. 3l.; '� � '" §�a;._ . � e k_ - � F . z � . `,-�� ,� _ . r .. ; > ; :. , F ,. . -; �� : �' �`� �>. � . �".'' . ,��=. . _ � • -. � d� �. . , , , , , ,. � . . � � : i , 3 .: r ,. . ''� ., ,, � 4 , ��„ , ;,� � � , � , ¥'- - : ., . ;. ,�. n.�. . , ,, _ a�`" r ' ,: 3��: _ � y � . , �; i ; �, � . . : , . `� /� .. � �:_ ,� ,_ � �► � - � , "�! �a .. q , '� _ I � ` - ,� ,, - .:. .�.. ,.. -. .-. � .�. : ., : . .:� . . .. .< .: -.,- ., ,. .. . :, �: ..,. �__ ,._ u � -.:,, .;. : .. - .;a�.�. : .. .�.m3' '";:.:a� , S'. .. : . ., _: s . . . • .. : - ... .�:�- � � ^ `� � _-'- .- . . Y ., . .- . :� � � ' -� � � . : . . t.. . y : - , ��. . . . , _: _.. ' ' _ -. � �'�.� � ,� � s. , � , -s- �'� ,... _ ; . R � , . ..,,.. �� ;' . . �. � .. . � . +v.a � 3e� _ �' + ' .. � e."� y'Y�-.. m �' " � ' ' i_�° . t. � .�� , , � . . �,--: ... a � , � .� , � < < ► : �,, � . � ,� . �. . , ; .: . ,. 4. .�, � , .. . �, �� M. � ��. r '.,� -. - y� �; :: . � ..:,� �_. ..�€. � ' . _..: �, ( . �':_ -; : � �'.:.. ,. �- _.:.�: ��:,,-_., ( �.d�wv : . ,�.. , .�. c. �� . _ t . � � , � . � �..3 �� k ., ; . _ � . ._s,. , , .�, .;'i . ,:" . �.. � , _ e �:. : . .:.. , - s -- .. .` - aF :. St .� -.. .� . fs IY'>:;� �. �-;, . ,_,� . w : .._ ,_. � -� +� �.." - .., .. :a� � �_� ..-,-, .�..,. ... ..... # -<. �-a�e � :':"'�'. � . .�..- . : , . . k _.� t. � �... � .. 7 s,P,""? . ._,.. . - . .:. � . -.:-: .� ' ��"� a " . � -.. . - a. � � � ' _ ' . �. . � , ..s .�: � . � _ . 8. . . . . "� . ' _. - - � -� , ' _ -"-. a : . ._ . . .� .:�. . .,�< -a�x ., ._ .._„ -:� ,�- ..3 _ �� - . ... . . , -- Y_.. . . _ . �. ��:: � .-,. _. d F . � :. . ..�_ . �,�:�F`, ,s.:.. _ .. x� ;}..,�_ . !�A �w� '.+' _ ,,. ':�� I.�: �;�. :.. �'. . ,�` . �, -�'v . s r . �. �.. . d . �. i �N ��.:: . ; . .: - � ,. : ; . �l . - ...�. � .. -.,�., � :=t, -." � }* . �' . y ¢ . . t� �" . � - _ �- , � . a ' � , ' 1. :�.. . .:= � , fi ' ti.. �. " ,':.... �. W: - � � ".. "' . . ` � , �`v' . .. ' , ti �k . 4 p � :. . Y �:, . i'. a .� ;; . . . . .� _ . ::" w :._ +: IM"'._ -.y."� -... i � ?R. - ; .... ... . � '� ." k" i .i.�a � � �"T � - �y"� ` " - .�bz � - . . _ �. ..., c � , �, .sr= � . ' .::-.. � F .� ! . .�� y � �� , . _.' ��.�� . ,t - .`3" � � S . ,_ ,,.. � . _ � .., -.. -f. . . ,. �� . #'�.: � . � � ' � ' - - - - _ a . ♦ r w � a. O .i. � . � r_ -", . _' _ _,- ' .� v . . � ..:.._ " ,� �� . ......�`. -p...:: ,_ " i(. ... ,.: . .r . . . _ - �... __ .. .: : � ._... ';,y __ � .:-H • -".. & - .: v .�� . � � r . .:,�.: , .. t._:.-. �' �'� . { °� '�'.:.'� i': :r v� ..... . $}��.. ` � �� _ . � � �. �. � t� a�:- _ it. � , �;-: ..�..: .. a . ,w :.. ; ,... ,--: .� �k�:.'� � �'_ - - ' +i� ..: . " `- - -,.: •. ... ..� � . , � . ;� __.<� � .�' �- . .. .. > a `o- �. - � ^'.4 ek.4'�. . ..;>� - � � .W t � � . ° f . ; � .� , . .. � ,... �.. _ � � _ . .- - �,r.� 1� ..�_ .. -.. _ -- � � �. -�. , - } . . ' . - .. ' - . i . '.r _ . .a f �. . • • ,.� : .•. �0,. ... '� l. X.:: - . . ,. � ?.: .v� rJ�, �� i--�-a=� . �' ,.�.w.,�.. • . - �;, _ . , �+� :'_.- ..,.�.T . : " � . .. :: ..,; .,.. . �.., : � ' - - '- u .�. 1<.: �__-�,. �� ..:-.:.' _ . . . .� : �.., ..: , �_.... � V � _ , �. �, :�, . , � � �'�aa.� tiy :' v F f ,.., . -.. � � , �� ° - : __ --- � 4 ^_'� ' ' �. ' �: '�., _ a "!�',�,�.;, • . «t. _ : �, __ _ : _ w . : � +� _ , �''� w: •�a i� � � � _ - - - r �� . �� ' � ..,-:_. . .�;, t �' � � •rs a . �_o . , ��.m. . .�'� � ..� � ' - - _� a �'� . � _ . . . . � - _ - .., ... .. � . _ ' . , _ " .�: �• ; _ . .� e ..� , . . . k... m �� . . .� . . . '� _ �. .. �- .. :: . _'�.. �.. ".. � w - :_ ��'� �^vc�,^� �`�s_ ..�� •:: _ � .:.:F� � ._. . ` . - ..._ � �,�s � . � ;....: . � . u7 "'> ' ; � � ' a� �.,� i �. � �,, . � n� , � :F . _ • , .� �' ►", ry ! � � � _ � y _ � . v , . q p �.i a�' ' ' r � .., i � . i� ! _3s.c � . . ,� -v u r ,y ' .: " i '��' . . �' :�, ' , t.. + � � s � ' _ � � ��it ��,_ - k A �. ..,... - ..�. AM"� �'., ' 4� �'�. � : � v� . . a ,,. . � . .. � . _ , , - - .. . F a Y ... �"�-.., . °, �:... �. ` .; r,d,:�p: , , +d + � L .,+l� : � : . ` � � .F � .~. _ ' ` � - , � __,. a ,. w�'.�, d r.o :.� ,v ' F� fr� `� . _ > .� � ,t �, �`. � ��.;�� .. � �� -' �' .. • ,- :.. � , ... � _ � . -x . . . h: e .i� .., a. - : _ �:. �, .. , ' . .. . � w �. � ` �.. ' L � � g � 1�' . v r:' � � � . �„� ... ,. �:. �z C - w �,.� � ` � _ "r . � .: . , . . . �, . fi *. " . .. _ �F' -' a k � ` ' s$ � ,. > K �,..., '� ._ ., °'� - . _ . , . . . r 'te= .. . . . . , - a„::- � , ��.:'. . �� - .. � .:: � ��, +P- � .� ^__.. � 2 ., � . . ... . _ ' � �� * F � a 3 ' � � ,'� � - y �:, .� .. .n f �� ..� �{ � �; .,.,��-" � . ,{ f � ', - �3• . _ '_ � I ,., ' . ' .' . ,., � . : .. . i , � . . ^ : �. . ��'�� .. • - 6 � 1M- -_J� � � �"�" �t * `� �� '4 ?P. t � �� . ' ' . , . • .;. r __ ;;. : _ '; ..�, . _ � ;' v . "W ' : """" ,�" . s � - ,.-. .. . . „ . . ,•' -. . ::� . , � � - . "•' ,�" y ,-. e �`�M' - < . V�. ... �''. "} � . u�. ' n � . . �', "'�� t. ..� . � �� .. � �� . q . '�� . . . , . � �, , . - _. . -,. ' . c: . ,., _ - _ � � '.... _ .. `-' _ s .-:. . . '. K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET/HOME TEAD E I L � S R TA CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KEMNETN RODNIGUES ! PARTNERS �N D E S I G N I M A G E R Y 4 1 S N 0 � T N W N 1 S M A N R D. S U 1 T E / I 0 0 �o �..,�.,.s.�,�� P W M A R K E T = _ I I I 1 � ��-� . � �. , t. � , . ..�L:' .:..i, .. i_!j1"�'y�R' . ,. . _�-_ �- _!'[�]".'�'t.. ' ____. ,�`:.,f_. -. . wr.a p . ,,, . , - � , " . . _ .. ..� _ . �� ..� .-.. .... .. .. .. _ _. .. ... . . . . . . . y .� '. fn: '" , ' _ � ..�. . .. . . . . . . �},..` - _., . • �� . _ �� .��. . . . �.... '� _." � �',.` : � Y � '.: � -i;"' I . f .4 t � : � + . . .... ._. . . . f' a I y � f '`',k r i�`. ,. _ , �i ° �; �" J e YY� } ti�' '.w I r•'r '� , r+� r i - ,'� �' I ��' �' .1 . p � ' �r.^�. ��x I I I , � �•_ ' . � ""i .�,� �' �� : 9 ' . � : ,+,'•� _ . �{ i : ..�.�� . �.11..� - .-s �'- �. , s � � v .r` . �' t,,t I �. � r �. I . ., � y � . �� : ` ; �fi� � 1 f ...�., .r' �..._./ r _ �� 4 � . � . � � ti � _ ak. I T • .; , . 6 yF, } . 15 5. '; , ;. , " _� .re ` -- � 't . "� � � � ., . � °� � � . - r - - - - -- - ... �. . ;�� - ., �- �-. - _ . . . . r - e k� � ", , � . . . . . t . �+r��_�,.. . . . . . i . ,p.` ,S . ;i . . � . : : . ��s � "� I � r. p i� . 3 � ��i. . _ . ' ,_. . . . ,� ._ � .,... ., - � _ I .� "_""_ a1� �� . -T , .. , � . . , . . �: . . , � . ,. -... � ��. , ' � * 1 , : � + . I :: �Fj+�:y -..��C�r �i�S 1 �� _ , _ '� " ' . �J a �.: ._. � � - � i � .�� _ . �.: � __ _ i. _ . _ _ � ... .. .. �a�.e..n.�.�_ .ei. . . -. .. ... : � . . � �("` , , .. . E' . . ,, � �„�„��„ . u.:'.: ,. � ;:: ' � �,'` Y 1 � t�'�� . ; .� _ �, . . ; .. �' . � . i �q i �k .' � ry � '! �� ,, - � � ;. - ,. ��__ �; - _ _ i: , .. , -- -- _ ` � - -- +. � ; --._.._. _.___ _._�___ ... __ �. �...._ � � -- _ ----__ - - _ ---- . _ _ - ��*�«< � �,�w �'� §. -- , � : �: - I .� � •:x� . =. . . � ; �,. A .. � - j __ _ _ _ - ,. _ _ ,_ «. . _ a: .:. � .. .. _, .,._ . � �..� � • , ';�.� _ _ .�� ' '. LEGEND . , ,� . ,,� : . � . ,, s�. ��, , �..��. .�. , ,p� . _ , g w i .. �. I �"'7';' S ' �,:'., �`=,� .'�, ,._ __tes ... . . -. _ '.,� V 1CS y'��F . . , � * � L � .. i �.. ... , .�. . .3 r '_.�. �'.. :�'r �f.-� „'a . ." .,. ... . . � .. � _.: � ... �ur . _ - �� : �,�.a iST , � : ��. �. CL,4Y TILE ROOF WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 2. PAINTED METAL GUTTER COLORS & 8 '3 8' 4 17; 10 '9 3. EXTERIOR PLASTER SYSTEM MATERIALS 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM i STOREFRONT SYSTEM `"'�"`� `'��`''��"'� 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR -- - ' , . . . , .. . _ . _. �,� . .__. �., _. , , LL , ..�. _ t --. w. �.�_ . � _...n . .-,. � : 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN __ _ _ `, _ : _ �. . , � . _ i �`� _•�: -- ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ��',�-� , . . _ � : . _. . _ � Ef __ . . _ _ _ ' 1�'r h ��. - �`• ,v �.�.'• �-r - �� ( �.""� f'" �',r ' ° i. '�a• ` 7. CLERESTORY WINDOWS ",r �?�„� �t„ , ,.��,� { � �,, �: `• �� 8. PLASTER REVEAL ,t� _ ;-,� � ,>� ; , , � = � � � k `w � � ,�y �, ; �•�: ; �'�' _ 4 a i }� � � • �° �. ��IYi�� . � � �+z` ; . � T.F . . . .. . .. . . . , _ 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR � � � . � _ . � _ �*�;. . : M „�t _ - - .� `.--�=, .�� _ - - n � f , # , � . , , ,* . . = . . t _ , � . . . . .. .,; .�. 10 OVERHEAD R t ... � �� t. ,�� ,. f ., �_ � _ __ �� -. :�� .E� _...____ --��.. � 3 ,,�� . OLL-UP DOOR , -- l � . � . . � � � � ,��- � . Y � � �. r . .'� , d .. 2 ' i � - }�V� 4 ��. � . q �. .+ h L , . . . . , � �._ �-: � T .. . _w .,.. . . . .... .,_ .... v .. . 1. � e ' 11. WOOD LINTEL =� .� _ _ _ ` ..4 ,. , .. , , , � � 4 ��.� A � ,� � � ��:� '� � s�� r"� �"> � q ,;-t.a ` �,,: �_ '+. �� .' . , . ;.-.. :1:._ �-a. a ..� ,�r . -� � � ..� r+ � � � ^j�j � �,R 9c�` �`a. � �� . I .�. , : .-. � . . p ♦�` , 1 ` ., .. `� . . .. .. . . . �,: I.. . . : � . P-r• ,. St '�. 1 � . , t"6_ j vi "` ' .t �•y� . i , � ' �y ti- 1� ��p � � �' . J 1� �.. . . . �' 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER i i i i. �� i � �� i < < i �� >�-� �� __ . m. t �. � �. _ , � ° ,�..° � �. ,,� {� � � •:i. ..�. °, 4� *X�:�4�• i � ��' ry . � . ' . � �:.�l: �a,+;.. � � ��i+Y� " c.; g�. . � ti1i _;.j \ I l 1 1 11? I) I I t l I) � � cW},; s�,- �:r ..a .�. � x ti=•",;�``��+��i�- �, 5F � ° , 13. WOOD TRELLIS ' � � � � � . .�,LL- , .. , _ , � ;.,�.,. ;'�� r;� � �+� � ,� ; �. __' "'_ _ 'T� ." ;� .�s� � : � it ��ra�.4"Yw . -......._.. �r �4 0.�;.. - i �^'�`�,�'#'�`� �t'°f'� .....__ -.� �. .. .. _ t G�� - � _.. .,--' -� ,. . y �.� �w . � . �. s� � �. '. .. ,�-' ..t ..-- .,� 1 � - �r�y, ;�. r , • ._ ,. , .,.:... .,_ ,,.. ,,, _.q�,• 3+ ��' t�'" sr� .t_ � r y .: . -,, :,. , . . , , , ._, ... . , : _: � � :�s- - � � ��-' � �.. ,� w . ;� � . 14 . � � �� 9 r F. � ., , , �r .��#.:. „ ° "$.. �'q` ' �.�` °�,� � , t 1 �� . `7 ��i!. � �' � �: CUT STONE VENEER . �r �.�w.. _ ,�.,�.. . �� - . � �.- .� ' ., , . , , . . ,.. . _ �, _ _ ,.: . :F - . . .:, . j -, �. " �-{, .,f� � � � 15. PRECAST TRIM 16. PRECAST CORNICE SOUTH ELEVATION 17. METAL WALL TRELLIS "" h""""'' �"` "-= � �� ti 18. DRIVE THRU WINDOW 31 17 � � 9, n � 4 � 14 8 1S 4 1��, � 7 � 19. DRIVE THROUGH CANOPY � � ` `,�-' �� Q T� i � ! �. I ..;�::rv, �. I I � I+ 11 � �'. � � ; � � \ �. 1 `• i .- ��"-rC� �+' h � �1\ -� i �: h:it �( �i I' �.:�; .- ,. Y ,�,� � . - !�. . � rd�r_�. � . . � ��1 - - ------'- �... . -„.., .... I � p ,. . ,_. . �, - . :r .:. .,_ ;. 2T-8' { { . � � , ., � Y � �,� <-. ...... .. ... _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ � _ .. _. . . . . .. _. .. . . . .. : � � ...,... ��: - � ' ' � - T �f .e3".� � ; x. , 24 rs� ,.,;�°. , _ _ . _ > ti - - - -,d� , _ _ _ ._ _ . ... _ , s:� . 3.. . � y , - - - - - - - - - - -_ �:.-'�"<E`>� - t,�,,,.- '�,�,., � • �. :S � � �� .� . ° ' �, � . . . x x ,�� , .;, ` 7 .a, ,x.�' ; � *`�.. ., .�-: 1.,' . . r � _` � . �-;� . ' _:,_ � ,,��-�_: �. . ..-+�,� , �d ` � .r- - 43 � ,r" ,;: _ . _ ., . _ . . I �'ys r §t � r , f ��v- - .� � . �� +S � - ' �;- � . `Snnta iSar �Bt'N�� ' � " � - _ _ 7� . ... : : - _. - y�� . . ' . - �. . �:�.- .. +-✓ 3' '+ � � ' . . .yy � g � ' 1 �.^%'"' �'Y�� ' �e?'� >� . ,..� '.a �-#i . ` .�.� ��" . ".,. ��' ".'L... $�.,_ .� � . . i + �-,�� !i F.�:�)�/}Z_��)(IS�t)\}� �.. "'yr�"s-, r�" .: �'� �� ." '- ' ,,,�� .�'::� :.`�'Y`�r r'� «'k �� r �. 7� � .. ,... , 1 ('()_\1151�.1) 1�1()\f' ',� � � ��;, - ..Ey + `;��. w`'/ � °� '} x, �'-.�� {'.:3F%} �� r.i+ � ��: �� f - • ¢ � I; A3 �, � ,�+ 1 , .. . .. . , ! % . . . .. �, .< . � , � e� � � �'�, � � �, - _ � , 4 i y . ' �- � �. w�� _ � . _:.r.r r- _ � .�/ . - �•� 4 � � KEYMAP � - „� w,.� . > r_:,�_ ,� . __� �`: .:� �-� �-� ;� _ i . .� i , � ` �: ��, , 'f �' - 1 ,.�- ---- - r� . ��`:.,.,,, ' . ,. ,. . -. ; r �, . � c ,. .. . �,. � . �'.' # ` "`� ' .-. .... ..,.. . . ..... . . . .. . , _ . - . . . . . L' • � � - �- , C -,. . a, - �r . �. ...-�-- .-. --.. ..-_. .. , . ;;�. ,.�;' _ . .. _ . � . .. .. . .. . . .. ... .. , R' v :.-. _ _� ... . , . �� r� - , "v � � a *. k;�? � . �� . :. _ . � ' ". . 3 r� � I� ��--r_- -�.:• ..:- �� .. _ , s � .. - _ + a •' �r.-__ :. � � '... �i • ♦ v i:`.' r .'., tl'. ..'.' e � r .: .. , . . .: . .; " :. i: . � , .'U� . i�t t� � � �. . ..� � i .. ..._.._......,�� , '�_.- ... . . .�u. � �. . '.. „p _ �'.�.1..�_�.7 _' _' �� . . _ � .. � , ... ,. - _ _ _ __ ..' _' _ .�.. - ' .... ...+... " .. _ .. p.., _ �s _ ' _ _ _ �. ; " " _ " '.' , i . r , l. �� . T. .��1'T��1 \ �. ��. . - : : wi. . �me! ., ..;,3y. >- :. -- _ .. .�: x- . �� .-. zLL.. �.. , . . ��._. : � _ . �, �, � ;., � `' :�wv'S`tiA: r « a,: ° - ---- . _; _: ., 'C: .�• � .. . , . . <�y r�" �.. i. .•S'...... . .�:- ,._ _�-. ' ...q - . ' ..'� � - � , , . . .:,��'`. . � .*, 3 - s.� � r i .. . .. . �;. 4.. �..., r� . -. _^.� y`2t;. e . • i � ;�� . . � .. � � .:. :e -. F. - i .,. .,. �.., ::� ". �� N. v�i l�k _ � . � -. c:_-.-...,�} . - - - ::� � �� I II. Eil.� �- �. �... �. .. '- y.. s_. _ _ ... ...� :. - :a, �.: �_�,.,�. g ;� _ :: . _ ". , :, : : -- . t k �Si. � .<� . � : a .,..� ._ : .'-, :. : + - , . ...�- -.,; . ..:.,.,; .r� �.! ` ;4 r ,: ° a�'+'''':. ' P .^ 1 �as��. ��f Y, � �' � � �.� _ � � ------ �`' t , � , �' �I��I�� , . � � �� " ' . � + � , : .� _ . _ , , � � . � � r *� � _ : �' �� i .w �� .t . , � . i � r ' ' � . . ?a , . i r '. rt12�,� L` .., 1 ,... -.. ' ��^:��c d � _. . :�-. _ :, � L ��.. � i.- " s }s7� s,.�s � . � f . . .. .. . � � , ,� � � f . . t . �.... .... . . � . � , m � 1 ' �. ' � . �' . �.�.� .r � y ..: , d 'b.,'�`" _ . � ! � �'"'r' �: � ' ': a �� ,- --- _ � `. �-+{J ` ' PAD 1 : ; - _ , � ,,, � � � �' r - � , , � _ _ s� � � . - � -- - - - } ��i i f1�xr� i�c� :;,. , , _ � � . . • � �. � � I - - ;.._, _, . � .. a . .� ,. � ,.. ��.T . � ... _ .. _ �. . � � . � . � . _ _ __. - _ � � , --, � ; � ;�- f # � � ` . .� � � „�,.,-�;_�.-,�,�, ¢ - ; t , i � . -- �.� . � t � : ; . _ � �m � = i�� ;� � � ;ti. �tic�i � ,: , s. , �y� � �3� � � � ! � ; , , �� r� � � � � . - : � � �- - - ,- - �- --. �._ � ,. . �� : � � � _ � � _ _ , , ,�� . �, � ;.�...;..� _ �iiz<,�� -� �' ---- �:: ��::,,.��_ , . _ ___ � - - - , � � � [ � � i �. f��i� � , �� _ - . � �� _ _ _ �, ; � ; :� _ . . � .�. , � , , �: , _ � _ _ , �: j , :_ . � _ __ � � �-. , �� . � 7 ; �� _ �- __ ___ ,: , �._ ,: ;, , �,�� - � � ��;� y � . , �'� � . � � ♦ R' - � = , � f � . � __ P' ., . _ _ . a-.v=k <:.�.�-.' p . ..,' , . ?>s' �t'"D «'ti �.. �4 ;4 '4�.^' i � ..`_; . . �. il 1r � , ... '�I:._..._:1_._ _ . . . � . .. . � .. .,.. ._ �' a 5.. x.. ,,� .ca". �y�,�,� .A 1 `$' ..i . . . , . �� _ �� . . . ' � - p� _ . L., . . . _ �_ ., � �-_, � f .., _ ;.-, _� - , , . ,. . . & , �'_. t- �; � ... ,� � �� . .. . _ . ?�� ? . . . �. �- c b c � �m '_. -'__.. . .� .., 5 Y . . �.. . , .,. . ._y- .,� a�: � _ . ..1�'. ¢..'._ . k . .. .. s"tl� i9?j- _ :��'`a',] r�.."h Y» a � I � .-��. . ��TR°�s �.. 'ri; . � .. ', T ' � . 5.. __ _. ' .�' ._� .�, � v.t�- ;. j ' - _.�:s'�s r � r . ' _ _ _ I - '�i � ." i€". _ - . . , � ", _ �- . �a� ,. _� . �. . - - .. 4 •�.� � _ _ _ v.: °� _ ..�y. +. �� ' � . x .. + ' ':. .-: ° =.".c 'ti i, ' . .� �� , :: . :. � .: i � '' ��:1 i � . . , ��r•> � K �� I � z. . i . i . . .. f � _� _. . 1 �^, _ __ __.._._.� � .. .: _ _ �': > . � �� - NORTH ELEVATION �--: � � , - :..., _---. - --- - � � ;--�, . � �_ _- - - - ' �>F , - ---------__=--- �___-�__-- -_-____-__- ..�ltFii�«i�� i� K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 � PW MA RKET/H ME A D ----- - � 0 TE F S R TA1L � ______ _ _ j CUPERTINO, CALIFORNlA �E� Nf7N �ooR,6�F5 . P N� P A D� F X T E R I 0 R E L E V A T 10 IV ° 3.° �� S MORTfI MN1SY �N RD. S Uli[ f 200 S ,,8-=,._o- �o��r.,w�,Ew �� aso9aso,00 P W M A R K E T o 8 . ,�, _ f _ __--_ MATERIALS �-�;� . ; � � �: � � �. t i . �� . k , .� � � , , �t� � ' ;;: t ,. c� ��c `,�"�' � ; I 1 ,�� , '*� 20 ' . 1. CLAY TILE ROOF - � �- ,;,� „� � -- - �.� , _� __. «1_ .. _.: w x_.�.�_.�...�_.,_. , �,;.. ;;4� �: �+ _ 4_. s�. _ _ __k _ _ --- _� _ _ _ ,�.,� ��:ti ° T c c)L[)R I .f c.F ��): �'; -� „r� """'-� � ; , r ; . � .�; t � 'o" � - '�?` �'�� , . : , Y . . ,:. , �•+, „ r:-x j . xt _� .. p� 1 "�r� �+ r V � f T _. y . _ .� . , . _. . . ,. ... . . � �»� �. , v . . 2. PAINTED METAL GUTTER �� y L � �, ; . .��. .-� _ #.� �; � �. ___�......_. _. _ _ ; �� ,�.;��. ,�,.��. � �_--�__T�_T._-�—_______�.,------ -.�,._____.__..,_� � �" _ _ - - - _ ��`- �-. . . , r -. �` �-• �- �;� -� , � -� 3. EXTERIOR PLA TER Y T M , . _ � : � � t : �- r . �'`.-.��'-'�fr :`. ` `��` �fi :r��F.�' ��r�.u+�s � ° !', �a� S S S E ~ . _ ^. . � ,, . _ _ �,t� F d # .- I � f � >`�`�� , � �_ . . ,� t � � *.. , , _ 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM w ,- �s�� , , - - -�-- _ � � - } _ _ �t - - - __ _ ��. � r. . -. . . .� � . �� , � t . . ; . . "` � . .�_ � � � . ... .; _ _ _ , , �, , � ; .m, � � . � ' _ _ -,_ .. . .wb� � p � � Yi� ,,,,N� �, . ,:.n - � , �� STOREFRONT SYSTEM � i ��i��il� �� i �ti �c � �� _ �t � ` � � _ _ , 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFR4NT ENTRY DOaR ` ` , <_ - , ,: _.��. � � 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN r ` � � - ' � ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ;s � � � �� _ � 4 �p , ti� � �} ''�''�' ��.. � 7. CLERESTORY WINDOWS 8. PLASTER REVEAL s. HOLLOW METAL DOOR '` '`;; "� `"� �:' -' EAST ELEVATI ON W EST ELEVATION 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 11. WOOD LINTEL _ _ ;__ .—, _ . � _� �: i4. '�.1 � � �g� �..�.� 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER � � � � : ; 13. WOOD TRELLIS � i('t i't)t.OR �0.6J1 2� � � _ _,______...�____.___.__._ � ..(.()I.UF:� C �1_��.�<. E. YV`r,,y.w?"�'w+.c;.,�� . r. 4 �� ' , r. f ' ., , j 4 �p:� ,�, .rs..._ r�- w_. i a � a __ . d`. � �.t Ii : • � :. . �......._,.:�e.. .......:...:.. �._ ....,�+-wrhe+.�r. .. _ ...-..R... _ - ..°a�s � SA. �i,7.w....:r ,, �:� 1 - � ' ... _ . .m,.f a � � .. �8� " ; °+ ,g��.? . ., ;� � j : . . . .. * � ,+ a��+„� . _. . ., _� ,. � .� {� _ i _ _ __,.. _ a � . r . . ... --. . �. * - , � . t � .; s �. tcs -ri , .. ,� �. • .,. �.�a�. , .. �. . � r�,� , * }� � � � '. �'� } d F" ;. !`"� ~�� .�.. � J t p d' S � .�,��`i' � * i�; ; �- �''`� }' � A .� ` �. .: '� _ _��.." __ �__�._ _ _ . 1 , rtt.�r r a �. ��rs,:ur � � .� � __ _ � _ " _ ,- - ---- --- — -- �� . � •• ��.i��t��i i � �— �. :: M�, <:�..�;. � , � . . � ` '� ',� � ° w . -� , . ., � . - �' , . x ,, ,, .� � . , � _ �_,, 1� �. _ , . � - .,.., , ,.. . . '" _ , �b �! � . ��- r �. � �,�a� , ; � `� 1 ; ` i'K 11 I a 1. 1111i F Ft t �. � � 1() 11 ?'+ k10 F K S t\l) N�RTH ELEVATIUN ��,�►�� , ; � � `� 5E�11 7R1��I'1}�F�T ('t)i c)K �1[i ��.e � t �� . � ^' `� -� � . o- � ` K 4�� . � o �, �, , t�, , �`�C- - .�� , r. �' �� „ _ �, �'�+ `.a`;;� �tx +y._�� , . 4k�---..-.--�,- _. �,.__�......_ _ -___,,�_._�:r_,�;:;. _ �-�,.,. ,�'� �,-, � - - . . r � N . .... � �.E "8y ,.- . . . � � 'ti ,,� , i r� - . . � .... . , � . � _� —..� .� . v M'�� v - � — a liK()\1F �"�� sJ-. ��..�.�.�......� .....�_�__�..� ._�°__ __��___ �_� � � ��►'� _. ____ _ , .�g �,. "`�' �. `�-: � _ � _ �" ��«.,..� �, \�'i!I)t)1� FR:��fk�- �' -` � �% a � ,. . -= .�,: . y . � " - __�_ — -- _ _ _ . y -_- ._ - ---� __ : :� ,�� - - -- . ,. �� f,� .�,_ . . � �'�' �� - a , �,.. � ; •- ' . � � ` KEY�IJIAP :a� E �� , j ; - � �� - _ _ _ , ; i �_ . . , , x �. < � ,� w :,= , � � � : i � . , �''�''} 3 � ' �� l f , � � a-t'a �;� �E . � P� ��i � "�� .i ` -- .l..,$fltil.if >� :�, �... _. ,..... � _: �' � �� , - , � ' y ' ` ? i � E : � - � . ` � � ��TNaI �t fA"' e . , ' '�.1 �"".`".�! � , ` 1 .� � � . . e. . � � � . . q. r � �..�.1.. , y p�� 1 r�#° ..,°� � � ., : � i ; F i tlt?ft al)C) ti fOoi� , �^ � � 1 ` q� . � _.� _ _ • . , , c ca �tast �� i<r�t , � , � -t ' � # , � � : � __ -> r, �_,a;�,� .'�r `� - i � � ��,•- . .-, .��, . . ., �� i �. 1 . , : , � �'t i .}�' g � �� S i Y t �. i . �. 1 r . ..� �. -. � . . � � ... ... _ �, ':'.> { a. . _ .. ... . ......,.._ . .._. ...., ' �� I � .�', " . _' ' . t :1 .0 _LT :�+±tre.. _..'� � _.�`.. � _.�«. �. .. _ ___ a� ------ ° �- ,�,,,,��"'�'' r � ,,�;,� � ° . � � �� TH ELEVATI�N �. a � 4 ,� �,��5 l Edaa el ,�, ; �� '� a 4� �; _ � . �'.� �I .. . _._, .. . , _ ,,. „,.. ' . :... .._.__ ` _ c�^�. _�._ �.�'..as � .:�_ . . lSit1)Lt �, } 1. 11! tt Y) K R P 1 � 3 0 3 1 , PI�I �IAR�ET H�ME TE�D RE�"A!L � / S � , C+UPERTlNO CALIFORIVIA � T �.. ..... .,. .. ...._ . PA D 2�X �� !� f� F L� ,E VA TI C� �V S �1,° ,° ■f■re 7� eO�Aa :.t++�. a ra•� �+i s; in_ aa! ■O!t• irNi SaiM R0. if�1t ��.�' , * 1 C 0 0 8� ' 6' 24' fIG�l��A�• qf('�r (a E 5 G 6 b S 9 7 w G / j �A, ��q � K E T � �� ---� ---- - ~' � i k"�, - LtC��NU C:UWFtS iic -' L�. : ' ��-� . �. .. ��. � � . �j T i . �� '� . � . �L.. �!' '+��,`� t . S. �'�}, , '�. . �� a � � ��'��: �M - _ .t_:.�. � {�,�� y��,y. . :1�-' , *`Z�' �$��-r .��, . . � . . x+.. �„_.:-.s-a 1- -- .�K-�- ...,;. �. ;$ 'K _ t �; ' +lt�ti,� ' _ _ • . �!d ""r �v' __ � __ .. _ _. _ MATERIALS , _ � , �4+ `"''�� , `•�'x " ` � _ �+s R: : } � ' �- �;; � . . .. , ° � � �� , - � '� _ _ :,, � . „ . ,-� � r� ��- �,. � � . � f � ��. - - - �r .� .� � �- .� . _... . _ 1. CLAY TILE ROOF � �, � � . � . . t�°v, "�.`�.: _�_._ T_ ._ - y � :� �,�� .��- �---�--� _ ;� I. 1Ki_F .1 (1. �_.__._,_ ,-____..r-----.___._ ___ • � —�- :,:; , ,. , - �. ,. � - ...�� 7 �, � .. �-: ....� ... . , .. - �-ll�:� ,•%?' � .. s . y '. t t ; - .. . � f� j ... . j�: �X _ ., � ��li i .. .. 2. PAINTED METAL <- � _ � . � _ - - -- - ;. .... _. . _._..__�.i.. __..._.. __._.__�_ .��. _...._.�_ _� _ • y, a. _ «. GUTTER " ' � tr �.�,'t ?�' �r _ �.__ _�._. , ��_,�.� � ,� M+�= - . . , , , ,. a., ,k . � - . , # '-... i�4 - t �. ,✓�,, - _, -n �2' � . - - m�---- - - _ . .�...�.._ _ . . _ _ , . � 3. EXTERfOR PLASTER SYSTEM `` - ,, � � . . , � . ; ,�^'� :.• :. - �. � . , � . ^ . -. - a �. i ..n � .. . . .. ,� , ., • . . � . . � . � _ . � ..t- "� �.. . . . ., . ,_ . .t .. 'J . . �- . . .� . � . . . �' ' � � '�.... � , + � .'�' �. , P,;: 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUt1AINUM !� STOREFRONT SYSTEM � n �` '� � * '' '� 'a • e =� 5. GLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR "�' `�"' " �° "` ; .� � F �}z�� F�� . ,< +� :� � . - . _ � � 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN s� – F=� ' x- �� ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 7. CLERESTORY WINDOWS EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATl4N 8. PLASTER REVEAL 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR �` �`�'� "Ft :�' �o �: ;� i ��.:. � 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 11. WOOD LINTEL — - _ _--? - - --- --- ; � 5_: � 7_� �4 J f� � '�?� 3_1 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAF�'ER ? ; 7 13. W04D TRELLIS » �< �� c�<��.�>k .�� a� -t1(71,I}h.�c'it:tLit'h" � ______�___ -----� s�'�v.,,� - - �"s- ~-= �. �_ _ i � �� ` ��:�" " � ., � t,�� r,� . �* . . ... " ..�,.,_ �; _.._ - � ,° -,�- � ,��- _ _ _ z •. , � t ` � fi 18' , _...; .� . , .. . „ < <.. ��___�,, ..,� +n �� <� - i'' �� . ,. ...-. � ...__ . . . a." � s" .. _. , , , - -- ------- � ^ - .� � _ , P+�' .�t. � r ,� t� , � -- ------- ---�---`-- --'----------- ------ - - - T � �� - x � � f'Ft.1l l S I. \�IRF'KI •e -.� .� � , � ,� . � F �. � � � , , : , � . � . � q �� X�� . .. �'. � \(),'_1�u��\tl.l.\ �r ' � --_ -_ _ -- -�'� � w f 12' . s' �5 --- - — --�--- � � `: , �� _ 5� - a +r„r � t - �, ; +3 �� ' �f . ... � . �. A . � � �# r-�. 0� �i 1�k:�� l� � 4��HNkt [ � �c� 11 "� K1\ i k ti 1\1� { '"� '' � 3 ` --� NORTH ELEVATI�N �,� � _ __l_� - i / � <>f l �fi'Ic 1h�11 IfL1\�I'1KF\I 1 ---� c-o�.<�tt;,-ib ' 4 3 11 , 51 � 7� ! r11 ' 12+, � � � 4 3 �' _ ._ _ m .�� - -- - -.. ,_. ._ ._ .. � � � � � � � � , � �.r'"`��7�.. { ` �.,. � �_ 20' � ��' - � �'�.. { ,3:,.. -�.�..�c J .-:...�.�._..y...., ..�. �. ... _ _... ,..��...�_ _.. � . ....._ .� . _ � ._ . . .._ -. � s , . .. ...... _ ..� .,. � � _. _ i ... _ _ � _.... _ - .. _ _ . _ _. . ._ �, � q..� �`+�c,�"" �+ . ,.. . }iF�()ti%.f i�'4nr 4�f:, , "t24,� f ` _-:' �; �� t . �. . � �z. _.�. z, a _ � .�_ . � � �' .- : . .� � � �.. �'.� .- . �11 � I>c ri� 3� fi.�i I I•_ , , � - � � ---- ---- �__ � _ _ �-------- —__.__.__ _ ___- — - -- - ------- — -- — ' � °.�`-"�. : ��. .� ��. w, � � � � , . . . �� , , _ � ;, � � - � � .; . . � KEYMAP °, �a = _, � ��g�� _ ___ � � , _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ � �. :- _r , ��; � - - ._ _ _;_ . . , _ : , '. . , ' � , ' _ _ . �� .� , _ , _, .. : - i . � [ _�, - - - .� ., ; ° ` . - , �'" , d � I s � �. ' , : « *,x: _ aa 4 � __ �PA� � � � � :� � � � � - ._ - _ .� -� �� - , , �� : . , i � � , ; f- .� � �►. ..t�lx ti�rr ra° • ro � � • �;: � a � ,, , __ '(^ '=� � � -- � � � ` �- ' ' �r ,.�, .� �; � ,� _Yt a s . . 4 , hl l)(>}Z11)()ti1()\F fi ='_ =` , ` *,` __ �T ^.�_ ._-x , ; _ .a Z . _ + t. .. � r' ` t'{) 111tif I) S[(l11 �S� ; �*" 1� n� . � , �� - r- � � } 1k---; . . , ; 4 �. . � � � � � € t ` � � � . �� t � � � �r_% . � �+` 3 < , ,� , , � � - A � � .'� � :� � � � ¢ � x ... ,�. . , r �.,, : � . -. =, �, � , . , � !� � , . #� �, �- -- ,�'°"�" ,. ; T � . , _ , ^-� �. _ , � °, ; '� � � . -��` .� �- _�-�--� . : , .�.. =•: __ . _ _ �._ _, "� � - : , �� ,� � .. .. � � , S UTH ELEVATI N .�. ��._, � � � .., ��_ � ,. � � , ., ,... � �__:�.�-� f' �+i t� t �,t; ,-,,�. �, _...- M .� _� �.; , 1 d3ii(9H?�i f1-�1\#�f.t)" ___.__� __,__ �_.__...___._. ...�____ �.�........... W.-�..,._..:�._�:.:J . � K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 ., P�l' �l A R�C E T� J� E T E A D R E �� L . �/ C� T -� � S � ,� CUP��T1fU0, CAZ�F�ORIVJA t��,�TN.00={`��. , F.�.*��: � P� D 3 EX �"� I41 � I4 E L E�/A T1 aas aor xb�srwr �p. so�tt �sce: O�� 0 2. 1 0. 1 8 � 't' _'.�` e �' � s' 2 e' y u a • .� . . . a [ � � a s " ° � � � � � � � � , - - ----- �"�! �""S�''s��,—�"'�--- - . , �� --- f 1 CLAY TILE R04F � , - �� - , . � � , , ('t1Ll)It I.i.(.1�.\Il: �. t i � 1 , ,�� . . � ; � -> -� .s . , , . � , i , • y - - k y, i� 20� � ' 1'� . . . � � .. . � }� _ _ ��'r '«.�ter y��s. - . .. t � ' �� 4 . ". ..... � : , .. .�+x.ekare��... ..:...:...a.. y-...� -.... �_ + . . ; y, �N � '•L• � a � ' ...:..�c..�. �" �. ` _ _ ' ' _ ' ' ' - r ' � ,.( � -1 �''�; � 1 1� .� � , y . i :. y � a , • �, '..� � �� .r �� .. .� X . ., 2. PAINTED METAL GUTTER -- - - � - - � :.r- � , �. , - ; a _.__ . . ,;: , .. . �., a r�.� .� ;a,'�* , .� '� � '� ., . ,. .. _ .� i � . . . � ... . i�.. .. _� . , _ p . . :: . ; .. .� ., k t , ' . � ` �z • : w'` , #["�,`'1v :>_ . . #"� . • � " � iti' j'^ �3��`, �' �'�� .... :..�. - � W . � _ : ., ! •' • � �� , . ;�_ ; ,�c „ 5t. � �� . . >_ - --- - �-- . �".e:� � ' .. ; w . " �..:_= � ' ' � � �� s��#. �"��- Y� . . _ .. . . . - . � .. �'�: •"� r ��'C . � . � . .. . . �. ��- ..: . . . ,�„ ,. ; . .. . .._, }. _. 3. EXTERIOR PLASTER SYSTEM �''° ��,.,� �-- � . �,h, : , -- --- , --- �. �.< - ,�.;.� � .=�`� ,, _ _ ,�,..��- �: � � w �� `�: ��V- _�- .;.� .� ��. . . _.. , »g ., : � ,e , : •�p"�; v� x, _. � •�, 1 � v�� __ � : . . . y# i p�r `� , 4 , n � �.. -.: � : a . � -- �' .• •..a� �.' _ �e : rf-�_�t ��j[,`_ � !'+�� _ , � »k; ' ` 6 : _ . , 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM � - �- � _ _ � . , :� - -- --- ------ ---- - ---- — -- __ _ _ - _ _ _ _. f . , � - w ., r - --, � __ . , �� ` ---- -_:_..T._.._ - - - -- ---- _ _ STOREFRONT SYSTEM "` ' ��' ,` _ 1 -`"`�` ; � _ �� :� , � . . :. ! - t , - .� _ . . '. - ! . � qv-!..,..-. � . a '.� r ' ff o h' � M � � 4 � f ��i ' i � � � �� .�� t «< 1 Q .- . - .�..� �,... _. '.___ .__ �. _ ..._. _. _._ _ _ .`. f 1 , � �. •"�'"k . z.�� . ,_ .. ._ ...- n..r.. � _ _ .,-_ . ._ � _ �.. - . I t k )_ � - . _ .. , _ . -. v _. _ � , , . , . -, t, � �-,� �:� � ' �.,- .. �. _"#"'-- � ..... ��,. ` 3.2 �, �. .1± .� .: .. .�,:.,• ..� � - . �� tii '" y � ' � �• ♦ :'�i' ' ' :.. : . , .::.� � �.. . � .: ._ ... , � .,. . . r � .. � . .. . � , • ` 1 . . � � ._ . . � :. .�.. .� .° �+. . � .._ .. .. ' . �: . � . : ,,.;�` � ' ,:: .�. _ . � � " � `,... .' � a . ',.. � '� ��:`✓ �� `. '.�'. , � - - ,. , � - ._ 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR f.�K- �Fk4 ti� ,� ��< � . _ y _ . . � _ ;, _ - � F- , - �.. � �. . � .. . � �. . - . ,. „� . � . . ,�„`Re�r�"'�; �...., . .. � kz; _s � _ � f �� i �� :3.e . . ' `--.__ r...�� ._ _. �.� � . i,, .. �'� .{ . .. I � . �,.,. - � � , � - .. , . .. _' .. � aa' � ,. �q" t ��°: fi. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET �N �� _ ; � �� `� � � " - � ��?� . � ,. . ,�; ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEtvI _ , �$ ' � � �� ; ! , �� '� �� ° �� `;_ � ��.� r�� ' � �� I � ��*��x+�;rr�; � � , . _, , , , . -� � � 7. CLERESTORY WIND0INS ` � ` ` - - �^ d ' ! - ` " "��- � . , . '�^'-,. : .. t " i"- - , � : , . , :; " _ .� „ " � - , „ .., ,,_ x . __.. , ,... ,, n _ _, _ . __ : , � _ _ � ; ,,: _ .. ,,. , ` , ,� 8. PLASTER REVEAL � �c � � c�t.cyR �i�.�,25 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR -�4..��K�?� - �o OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR NORTH ELEVATI�N SOUTH ELEVATION 11. W�OD LINTEL 12. EXPOSED W(JOD RAFTER 13. WOOD TRELLIS ic�i c��>i.oK.c>.h„ _ 3 _ 1 _� _. . ,_5 �� r 3 a � i �'' 2 � -(:OI.131�:\ l l(.11.It P:" - - � _ _ . 26� _ _ _ � ..�� ' � � . ; ; � . ' �r' 20 � • _.__��---e°.-�.-----t--- ......_,__.._...:_� ._�._..--,,; � �'� . , � y .'°��p,r.'d`�. ,. -• ' . : _,_,_� � � „ ,s�,*s _ 4 �'' .' ' � -' � � � " �� `'�" . a. -`_ c „ ' � : . ^'^,. . ,� i'k.1I 1 �1 1.l\iliFltl �..;�'�,..�,� � " �4 , -,� ' � + � � Y `' ^ � - �` ` �,�^ - .�� . _ � .. � \().'1��\.1\If l.-\ + ,� - '� , ' , , : z'� � .. - y �. � r : 9 4 =�: b ``d �* � �,�,,. : : � _ .__,._ '�� .� + ' V _ __� _ . _ � . „ (��,�1f ,�. _. __.,._ , . � ,� � � � „' c e _ . _ . . ..._ . . .__ �+R01�+t4 � 6 } !` .�aY�r`� ._ . _ .' __--__ ' _ _'__._ .__.._...�__� +9 �� t�. _ r5 . + Y S � � ^t^•:'.+aelRp , �' , • —_ _ r .--..� _ _ _ _ ' � 11 r..,..... �� '� w . _ ..� � .,.. �,_ ,:..�_ F . � I .- r . . . ,..,.,-. .. �� ... . � p.� 1 � � ��F �' , �a� i A ,� ..<< � Y, ,k i � . � � - � rt�� ... . �( � f k:�rra i..��tt�t•Hr , � � � �� ' � �o.�� zv kn u ti ��t� � , � � � , � , �� ° ._ µ _ , _ .. „ . , _ �. ��_ . . , - . .�..� .� •� . -w. �.. � � �� = Q -. ' EAST ELEVATION '� .413 c�11'il'I< , 51 �11 1 K \\til'.\k{ \ i � _�� , _ ('() .(]R = 16 _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _. _ _ _ __ _ _. _ _ ._q \ � � �.—� � 12� ` 11 �..t- f.—� � � 1 ; 13 € - I ��, � s �` <, _. , .K � � ..�.,. : , I - - - - � � - . > � �� - � , � � ..�- x ��;: . I � t a � �-�� .• t "?--�.. �� , �, �; � - � v i �; 4 ,g Kft()��1' t 4 i�' �`� i ' � ' � � '' . .' , �G."� . . ~ �' i �' -5� 4� a. ' i.h •�-.� ^°� ' �„' '"`'�:-}, � ' ,�*�. .� .1 �' ____ ,._. _ g - - ^ .-.�S..ar�. t �.` -=r '�`� { , y� y� . _ . N'1\I>()\�' tR:�\tF: �,. � r �! , _•,. . � � s ., _ ��- � ,�. �� ` � :'� '� �:��,, ; • :. . � _.� � ,,,,� ,�`�` _ _ . , . �� ;� � � �� S � °. .. _ `_� � ��'� � ' r � , � :. +S� i -� �s s :;" ,�: ��..;: 3^, �s�-�,. ' � . *"i . T �. �..�� + r �� 't y:,w�� - '�` ° ♦ � �� `�t4z. KEYMAP . y. _ � � :-_ �� ,� � � �; • • . � �,..� � , ,. , -•.., y � . _ ., , � ,�9�� . ;� , r , - � •� • ".�.�;.��?"�3��`' -3 3� } .�- r °�;t , � : ,,. x �.,Y t ;� � �� • • ,�;; � , � ; ^* ��- , � �� -.--,�»�,.- +�`: — dx. � . 4 ..� � ae e" ..� � .n ' �� :,�.. $' • ; ' .,�.:" _ �,�. , � 1 � � "r� i�'. � P'1 ' . ._. . ... .. ... ....... ..._` . . . . . . .. . . . ,. . . .. ... . . � F ,._.. ..,. _.-..._,-..,..,..�� a_ : . . . �, _ � . .__ . ,. .. . ..- _. . � . , , � "'�'`��+�, � ._� .: _...� ,. � ___. � � �.aa. . , ., . . '�' . _ �- � , . . ,:. .. . . . . � . : � �_..__ ..�. . �_ ♦ jC �'..��. R � • wvs� � �- - a . . � . A2., � y � � � � .. � '� � s 'k �v ' � �. �-� : ♦. . �. . ; � ,', .. , tr... .�.. ' �_;.'�p. � -< �.:�_:.. .. � ��: {T� i.'� - ��.' g ' u €.; ' � ' ^. � � -�v-a+r . � M � a �; �, � ... r . � _ . _ - _ _ A ; -_ � �r"".�' ; ' -�:3 : . ..: . �f . ; . � . t - ►^�--- _ `_�' r , �, , -,< �„ �� . �� .x � �`� r�� , �` � . - .�,�,�,,, , _ -, .- , . . ` � r . c�.-¢� � { f+ . > '°."-.�`-- � xg�hrf� lia�' ra" F��^° �^" a .. _ �~ ,� ~. a , . =� .� � ��€ - �x' - i .. . ; i ;.�...... ; , ? n; ; . I � �a'�,. �` �� - - �� ,_ . � � � , .� t {It--�.c - 1�},;..,... 1 f ? : Ic _ F 1.1)( > K 1 f)t 5 S l< 71 I < � �� , �, ��, 3� ,.,� �.: . . �_ ; c. � � a � -�+ i `. . . -� _ i � ,� m � � , . � � �� d y � s > :a =' ' � � � ; � !� " () �)ti�t)\ Y6R r � y � - , � � ,, ,,...:. ( y . . 11dS1 F [ : ....._. �' . 3 a . . :.�.. " ' � � - � � A � ... .. . # , ! , r , � � ..� . '�" f _ _ , _: . ,_ , � ... 1 �� A'.c �� .7 . 3 ��. � ' � >.. _� . . � - . , � � , ,: . �:,�a �. i� �_ :_ ' � i t y i , 3 � . t i i < - . � Y � T �• y �, . . { :. ,.,, �, � � . . ��. .{ . . : .�, w ,ws. . : , . , ' ' ' _ -- - �� . .� ..».. ...:. � ...Y. .1. .l y< : � • � • }(... �,; ... � a, .. � . _ #� � �u� � n a �+ . _ . ,.� � '-&. t "' ' 6 �g , _ .: � 9' .. .. s�- � . _, c-� c_ � P� ;� �,. .:,. ,. ,.>«, 2L ��`'a' . «N�.�o' '� ��W .� - '�.2�. ..� �;.s:« .'.r <.,�-.. � 4 .� - `.�.;., �"'8a+�,;: �, . ':uc ��'�`y a ,3 "q� ,, .* . ,��+'; r' �"�� ,; k a . — � � _ ' ...__._._ � � ..._.._ _'_.._.___ __..�_. ...� ' ' _ „� \, L .Lh ,"., �. ,. � '�� ` � 7 � �,y"'��; _. �.�.._.- . '. „� .� " _ I ,.� �' ' " . .� ; � �. : w. :........, `�- :- - �.......�"°y,,: _ R x�... ti y � ... '� - - �e.< 6 F�.. '� �� S a � „..,....: . �� .. � .. i�i r C'L-�, f �'. I ��' i i• 1-; �' � . � � t � 1NE�T ELEVATI(JN •; : i;t st�. � � �i; ��,� t'�. , _ :: _ .— _ '...,., .,�_�. ; ' fittll«'ti f 1.,4ti1!# 1) P�� A R K� T 1� I� A D .__� �.�...__�._ K R P 1 2 3. 8 3 2 / � E TE 3 S R E� A I L �--. �.�.. __._...__ _�. ._.___..._ _�. _ � __ __ � CUPERTINO CALIFORNlA �;wrt7� �41R�t�tS t w�■•Nee« �yC I � / � � � � � � � 1 � J , � � L v � i ' V � . . ��! �IO�TM RN11f1lN /8. SC'at/ �?�6 �•% � � v a � ,/ (� � 1 4 . ! f� rG�N 1 i1M s�'( w G♦ f S 6• 6!� 0 � T O � � � � � � � � .... 4 8' 16' 32' � �� A r�� . _. . . _ . _. ' DESI(�N CONCEPT �- . ` . __ , .� :. . � � . . • RE-DEFINE THE ARCHITECTURE THEME 1 STYLE ,,✓'.��, -�� " � � � ___ . - -p � . _ , �... . . _ , ,. � t . _ _ ___ _. �;, �,. -'`.. , � _ 1* , �,,.�.- � � $-,-.' �,-' �. � ^�� YANKET � :..�._ -..� �+ �_ _'..-:: _ . �vt-r .+ E :-..._*' � f " i. __ .. }"{}..:j __ _. .. ��,� .. .._"_. " ._.:i- .. � e, 4'�';r� . , ' � : .. , .., . � -. , � � . � � � � � . �+_#^ . - = �. { � �` 4 , . , ,� , • �+, - , . , _ � � -. r- YMy . } •4 ` � �„ _""'^� � . ,. ,. ,. . .. . . _ . . : ., _, ... , , • , - :. IG.. _ �-,z� � � � � . - - _ 1.�_:1:t .. .,,r _��,. � F' . '' . - ° . • . . ` , , - . ' . .�, , . �, -� . _ , r' , � '� w' . , � F� '��.'�....� .�� ,'�.�:�� _�.� � � ,. �..�,�� . x ., _ � _ r.. = .. _�.�. .. . .:_ � , . .,� : . �, y„ _ _: ., �,,� ,_� . j � n _ � • INCREASE TENANT IDENTITY PROPaSED NORTH ELEVATION ALONG HOMESTEAD ROAD 1"=40'-Q" . � ) ' EXISTING BLDGS • NEW ENTRY TOWERS • ENRICH SHOPPING FJCPERlENCE & ATMOSPHERE • NEW TEXTURED AND COLOf�D WALKWAY • IN-fiLLED COVEREO W14L1CWAY • ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN ACTNITY � .. � �.,.., � � � � �� _ _ _ _ x �_ _ �.��. -- a. � - _. _ _ __ ,,s � �� ry ��. �- �. .� n � ,_., _,�,-�. �.r . . . , _ .. . . � � n._�..�.e�..�,��_ u , L : . _ , ,:. - , , � .. _ T. -- '. .- _ , � �- � . ...: _ . � , _ z�.. £ r �� . r � _ . _ . �, , � . _,, .. . , �. . . : _ __ _._ _ . _ ;_ � _ _ _- __ :, , ` ._ ._ R�, - �.� � :.�. _ - _. .. _ . _. . _ _ . ; , _ , � , . s _ . ,,. . f .. , . . ; _ . . ,. - � . , . .� _ ,.. , ,� . , ,��. ,. . . -�Af. �, " .' , � {�, � � � • REAT M NI � ' _ �_. � ;. �. , . _ _ . , .. . r �, -, �. � _ C E C�M U TY GATHERING SPACES - .. . . � . . _ , . , ,,..tY . � .. .. m a _. ��-.- _- �� i,,, ..-_�.:. ��_•� � ��- . . ::. t :._ : �... .._:. .. . .. . . 4 A. .__ . ..:' -�.-... . . "� .. . .k. ......�. i--^:�`�Y"" :� . . i. �'�@..._..-.� _. � .. .,iM�„�_. _�__•. .. _ �--� #'' � . . � � - � � : . ,.F. �� --�. . . , �,.� . � o W.... � '_��.. .... EXISTING NORTH ELEVATIQN ALONG H�MESTEAD RDAD (1 "=40'-0") • DESIGN HUMAN SCALE ARCHITECTURE . -_' r' 4 �'ti �A11 _ _ �A11�: i g . � �, NEW MAJOR 1 NEW MAJOR 2 NEW MAJ4R 3 �i i� � ,ti �i � - �— ---x r ___ _� ': � . . - . � _�-.-.---a.►- ,-- , $ �--- r -- . , �'�' • '-_•_ • • 1�4-..--- , . �._ _ . _ -�_ __ ...- 5 • � _. r ��.:�. : , ; . :_� � r , , u, , �. , � I ._ . -�,�...� <-�{_�� - ! . . .. _...s ��.. . .�.r�b- . . �� r , ': • \• t � � �' . . i F � - 1 , �:., �3� . _ 6 4._.�.,_ � ;,�s�3i .. � . : . . . � 1 . I ':�F�3 ;!;;� �� '��'?'x�`z, .. '--- � ! i �. , � ' _. . ; ., � ' ; ; , � , , - I t ._...�....,.. 1 1 j . j � g ; .� . � . : , � i_ . :_ i . 4. —_—�L_=— ''�'� _.� �-_� _ _. -- ' �_ _111'�11_ ._ _�__ - 1 i , � � . ,. � ----�-- �- � : . , � - � � L ..,�' -- - , _ _ -�=:;- -*� — - - _� - - - --d ' � �.- � - �. � _ ._ . - ..0 v -1 - u - . _ _ rx m: r ... _ .. e �� '� ��° - '�- ..� . .. . .. .... _ . _ . . ' .., �__ l P .,t , t' � _ _, � � ��—�--- —�— �`— � °� � — ---�" _ _; _ --- � . - i- - - ;�'� r � i � m�_a,�s _ ' � � --. . � Y ,� � � , --�-- -•�^- �_ . ( . . � . , .- . � q . . i .� I . . , . . . _ . �,•�:, - . , , . . . . . . . .. . �` . . � . .. . . .e�. . . .. . . i.. .S.- . _ ..� 4 , . . . ;: '`-�. � _ _ ._ ._ ...�. -_...... _ � �� . �,` . ` ' � ' ...._-..�._.--.-.-..�.- .__.. _.. ` _ . ..-_._._. ._. __:_ X �.Y_Ar... ._...:._......_..�._...��._ _ � � � r � _ _ . ._ ..___ ...__ _' _ _._� _ . _ z fi . _ . .. . . . .. �t `+.'j '�i�. , _ . �_. . �_.-.-'-.=�°.- _ _ . _ . - . .. . - � - . . __. .... . _. . . . .. _. '- _' _ ' - -_, _'_ _.__ . _. _ . _. . _ . .J. ' _ _ _..._._ � :..�_„ .��_ ,' - . -.._ __ _. ._._ - -�: .__- _ . . '__' - __ _ __._ � �� ...._ _. _ - .' _ _ ,..-..._ - . , ,, _ . ,. ..,, . � ..._. _ .. ._._.. , ._ .-� -,-�..:_.�o....`. .. � ' _.. _ _ ,.. � � _.... ' _- �.,,_,_ _, �� - - - __ �: �--- _, _°�w, . I � " . -. ._. p i � � � -...__.. rt � - j ', " . . .�,. � r_ ;.- � --- � .. . - - . � �. . � . _.,. � ..., .� � . _, \ r .. . . � � --•_ �-r_..-�_ - : � `� i ��. v._ ..... ..... ..._ - - - '- - - � . . �- �' �- �- -- ._ . . __ -t �. � ...a.. f , __ _ � COMMU GATHERING SPACE ARCHITEC SECONDA FOCAL PO INT ; IN-SETW STO MA F OCA L POINT i �---- -- --- — _ _ _—._ � I • TRELLIS WITH ViNES ^ • MODERN MEDITERRANEAN / MISSIQN STYLE ----- CURVED ARCADE - -- � • POTS AND BENCHES _ • FQUNTAIN --~ • OUTDOOFt DINIt+IG PATlO . DIFfERENT FORMS, MATERIALS, � COLORS . PALMS Of� SAMBOO BACKDROP • UGNTINC, FI)CTURES • PALMS OR BAMBOO BACKDROP ;• WALL FOUNTAIN ,. INCREASE SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY ', . LOYV SEATING WIV.L. GATHERII�'a SPACE • BANt�R SlGNS • POTS AND BENCHES, GATHEFtING SPACE ' '• UN�REUA , TASLES � CHAiRS I• TdWER ELEMENT3 '• NEW TEXTURED AND COLORED WALtCWAY . NEW TEXTURED AN0 COIOFt£O WALKWAY • NEYV TEXTURED AND t'ALORED WAl.KWAY ' i ' '• DIFFERENT PEDESTRIAN SCALE ARCADE ELEMENTS ' • LINED TREES Q ENTRY DRfVEWAY s C4VERED WALKWAY • LINED TREES � ENTRY DRNEWAY I' , � � I � ; i { �" i aT � � y� ,# � , ' - ; � :n .,� - . r.ca ., - � -. ` �.± .� �'r \ . , ,. i a .: , _.K_--�s_ ��..,.�-:. ��-�,...`..,�—a _' c"'._` - .� -•--- t- - - ,_ - =r -. __.._ _ ._ _-.--='-^_�-- - . _- -- ----- _�_�.__°_ -- �' a - _ __ _ ,+1 � . _. _. -�..�_.._-_..�� ° , �' _.. .- � _.:._ �. -, , _.____ _ - - - - - - - � _.._,_._.,.,,....., r .-_ _ , . _ � . � a.� - --- - _ T - ---_ -- - � : ..., _ �, - - - - -_ _ -- --- - - — --- '— --_ - � � � -----' � _._ _ _.. j _., �. �= , �, , ,. . a - �'T ' -� � . fe�t' SEJS�"'�- �, � - - - --- _.. _ ------- . : - � `.� ;� *.� �i �_. -.. ...�. .,e,_y„_..... ' ' . ': .-.....-._w_�.�_ �' �.. ... ��, � �«6T'.:F�..I`�+��: v�-l.: 1i aV - 1 .�i�'.. . ..- � �- � .. , ..�_.�:lh+c-.�..,y. --�-- .:� .1w. ..�� . , .r"^� I 'X.'�. . z �� t+ ., ,, _. �u � ._-.. __, _..., -.e._ �, ,. , d° a x �,TM . � � _ ,....�. ..._�;� �. �s,�..� ,.<:,.-.__. _ , . .--�. �. r _ _. _A_---- .- ' `;. :..-_ --- . .. ,, , + i t� - _._. - _ _ __ _ c ., .. t r _:., , � .n M A �t K E T � , . , _�,�r ,. : }_ „ � ,, : :: �` ` � -- �'�;;' , � - - - s�i.. � - �_ �- „ . , , a �- . . , . . ,- .��._. . , , �!K_:.u..� -. � �. �......�. r_ch . .. � � . ..et ..::� �.: , .`. : : r , r�� '�-. 4 _+� � .�.':G w �.�e,b- . X �- - .... "�.a �---",----.-... .._ . .�.` �-- --- !dS .._ . . 4 :._��,..,.f. r , . _ ;� � � - *_. - . w , , � i +g�+ � � ,K � !' . . -�ew ,. .. �� . ; �, _ :_ .-. .�. J .. -Y S ._ � �._.� y . � �.._ _ - � ___�_ � _ _ _ _ _. _' �, . . . �... + _ . .�_ , . i . .. : . . . . . . . .: � � ..: �' - __ : ` ,_ i y � . _' � f: .i 1� . : �. � ! � . .! 4 '.. . . % � : d t� � ♦ � � , - ..i .., a . ' � '. - L . 7 � P . ;y r iv- : ��,'t� �:�t �� . i-�'� .. F � � ��.`� }'+I' f ; � , t, ,. 4 _ � � �..tid ; � ' ' j�� , ( �`� � >• � , �, _. e _ . , � ,: . , . , ' �: i . , _ +� � , . } . � . �.. - .. , i , ♦ . .Y.. , , _ y-.. ,. . . _,� - . ,�-- .� .. , y , �'1" . . . .-o-., � �, ... F . t3.... � , +._,.:. y, � � u � _ .�:_.. . : _p� � � i ��. _ ._.. -�- .. v: .... . _. - . �._ , . . .. . : .7' �: , , t � _ � . , - � .. .�... _ "' . r . ..�-�.� # s_�- i { _ � , .� � "� 1� ^ .. :. � ' _ _ .: ..., 1 >`-a V -�sk�- f � s.. , ` � �:�, . _ . .� 4. _� . ...� � .:�.lk--�.m�:s�-.__ � ��.._� ,� -- ;....�_ .. �� _�:i�_ -�.�-��_- ��.�_ �_ °. _:_ ^ �~ ��6� ��.�� 4m� �,P'1� i}� �:.. ,L�� -- _ .�_ ..•...WT l.M _ . . _ _ .. �_ '.. _ . . s.. ��-. . ENLARG�D PR�POSED MAJt'JRS E�EVATI4N & PARTIA� FLQOR PLAN��I "=20'-0") K R€ 3 2 3. 0 3 1 f P UV MA J4� E T l�� M E A D / TE � S RETAIL � �UPE�?TINO CALIF�RNIA , �IAJ�RS �X ��E�I ��4 �L�VA TI��IS J� .2., '1[CMiil1M ateoa. c � t, a rar+-. cAS !�: 3� .' 0. ' 9 s�a Ko�rx 1N1;�4M •o. sai*t �3m.� � a W•' ♦�� r i fi r { s 1 b � L e 5 �.: : � t� �° W I� A R K��' 2. PAINTED METAL GUTTER `W � " � � � 3. EXTERIOR PLASTER SYSTEM , Z � 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM �� R STOREFRONT SYSTEM ------------------- - '� r � �---------------------- ----------------------------------� 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR �' � � �' � 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN � , ___ _ _ _�__, '"'�°' : . "'�'" : -y ��' �-'`'""'`'�-._ .'�°''`�"�.. - ., _ _ ..__._ _ . � , _ � � , _ _ .. . �, . �, , . _. � F , � ..,- � ' �� .� ,...T,"s� .�.{ , .. - 4 s � �-�.;i +.� -, � ., :`w .<;;.. .. �, : . ..w , . }� �s..�Kam�i .•'�- �.__::� _ -,.5. �. � ,.. . ., _. .. '�-. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM , . .�� - ; : ;: �. �� ;�;- _ -}� . �-�.. .., --�� r ��: k�. E;,. . .: 4 t , � �., i : 1 �. ,�,�.: .. . .. � i) - � ,�„�., � �� - ' - - js � ,'. i , ., . ., �. . � � �✓ 7 CLERESTORY WlNDO1JVS _ � ,� � ' ' - , ._ _..� _ . _ - - � � �_ :�o �.- -- • :�;�:.��_ . �.�: � ��"� ��: _ . n � ,. : , ;; . _. . �. � r . . _ � . __ _ �� ...� ` � _� . ; , _ � .� . i �. , ..�:o_ "�„- �, ��_�,.�,._ 8. PLASTER REVEAL -.___� �__---- -------------------------�,___________________----- --�_____,�__�________----_ _____.�__.�__�.______�.__�._.�-_______- 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION ALONG HOMESTEAD ROAD (1"=40'-0"} 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 11. WOOD LiNTEL 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER 20. BANNERS 13. WOOD TRELLIS 21. PRECAST MEDALLION �° � '-., ; 14. CUT STONE VENEER 22. NEW COVERED ARCADE \ ��'` ° ,�. _ . -�- s , � ��. . . 15. PRECAST TRIM 23. LOW STONE SEAT WALL �� '�� .��. � � � .�. 16. PRECAST CORNICE 24. NEW FREE STANDING ENTRY �. N,1 ; . � ��y t�r r�~ ,� 7. i��+,I � �.� ,�! �� F.I I�t �K_�I�c� 51l)�t: RRc)�%l. c�i.! �11'I< f'12:1I E� 1:.1�iBt:KC PRif ��: L:�\1E31�RT 1('I t�c)LC)R �U.6Si (c l a'c)I.i�R �O G'4 Ic'I �'c�l,c)ft `c�,c�c METAL WALL TRELLIS 25. REPAINT EXISTING BUILDING �;� ,:�� ,�: ��.�,E <<>>k ��,�n�,« �,t�„F s�� N,••��•Nf•� ��.>> = 9 K1�!•kSl�l) �{,.:,,,�,��,.,,, � -� :OLI)F�C'F6\1.!( f•. R1�TR�)" ��6�R\iFR511.111\1(" 18. DRIVE THRU WINDOW 26. NEW GUARD RAI� T4 MATCH EXiSTING ;"" "" � ` ",,, �, � ��'�� - "� C4LORS & MATERIALS 19. DRIVE THROUGH CANOPY 27. EXISTING TR�ES T4 REMAIN � �15 3 14 4 �1 i 24 22 LL 24 25 � 22 t 24 � � Al2 } � A14 � � ,, - _ _ � ._.. ... .._. .._. ...._ _.... � _ � � � _ � _ ._ ._ _... � - - - - .,... � ..... � .... ._.. ...._ � � _ _ � ..._ ._ ..._ ...... _._ _.... ...... ...._ _.._ ..... ..,.. � ,... ._.. . .... ...... ...._ � - - - - - - - - - - � ♦ � � ! �, � / \ , i � �� ` § , � � . + _ . F � ;.., i ,�`��"� �- y �. :� �f ;� � � }.,," - �,, � � _ � �',, - � -. .�.:� - ..� �i��tr��.,j��+{(r� i� f �{ , . i �� . '�l� ` 5 �� : �� .. , � �." I `, �.. �'y��. .i�.,�; '�,--_:. :;=.�• : t •.• _., , f ,> , �': ... r I': t �) ( �� '� � � i, ,,� .z�'�. ,�� ,'� ,��.�"t� ..a� e � d . ��.�, T ... _ . . _�i1 •w 4� . I I € �" �' 2. :�, . � ' 4 y:ai.. �,.. _ _ -._. , �.r�_...__ ...<. •� -• ♦_. J - _ _.. ._. _ �.__.« ] t 7{ � �-�� fr 1 '1 rl ,�a `A '��' t d �:;€.g � .. ___ ._ __ . .�_ . _ ._ . ._._ ��+A--'+--.'�...+.w� . - - " ." .. _ .. _ _ _ - . � 1 ' -. ��' � � .� S. � ..e �. , _.. oit�� ..F . t t �. j�( i 1 � �� 1 . . __.. +� . 5��.1_ '_ _ _ "� . �..3i�-. �'; 1� �� ` . . _... -•-__.._:..,,._.: ,r.. - !r .1 ��{ � �) "rv? v0 . \' '.4. kt'44�: �.,- . -. �' '--..,o- ....,,. . __ �.:-�,_..- ' ' - + t�,< S l � � } ��e �.:. .� .. . �� _ . . , , r f� : � �, � r� � t, 1 - - .' ��; ' , t i ,; ,,:� -l'i affl eL.til � ' , �t 1 �"r ._ t�? ,t,. � �� { g i ` / �.12ia��_. \ .. . . t, .., . .. - �.. � .�_ �./ a � � �. � �, , . :R= . ,- , q ! � , �� . � � ! �t . . .r9±.-�. , . . �_ ,. '�� ,�.,� ��.i.��, .,--F,s;\� r , , � ., y� , _�-�^^---,. ...�.. ; 11:.. .�..,s, ; t a�^ aF��`�':', @"� t - ,.,t �' ro. .. . . . i � - .. r R - �.\, x _� -�. �� . � �I � t 1 . � � � t}� 1 . . _ , .. _ _ �k`.'°'� �4.. ��,. ...� .�.-,� ji r� /3 , --�--�.. ._'__. c .. �6 r..,.. ��£�S��trh4 �2 � �. �- r � . : .. . ... . e. �. .. �� .r � �P . ...� . ....*. .:r .., ,ii�,..,.�. . ...,.... o I, " t � ,� �� .� �.._ �� . : t'' '�� \ `� a. . . „ , : . . - . . , _ . ..� fi- .. j .� �: • ; . ..: � : '� � L _ �.. +. ��'�'r � . _ ,°}- � '� �.- .. . tic. P . . � 1� J P . � e '� `� a.. . ., , , a , � . , , 1. , . . � , � , , -�.,�;."-,.'+y` ,,� �t...: ,. . .:J1' . ' . . . � � •- i r ^�. � _ . , t � � �,; , ,, �.. . 4,. ,. � a �-, . �,. . . ! ,E . ,t 4 �� :,t '-- , � : A k � -. ,,...-- �fi , -.,. .t. _ _ . . f. , 1 ,f \ - r � �'i ; � � .. . ., . _ h� .. . , > . t � -�. . � �. t -• ,�:.1 , , ti. _.� I � a � � i, r z,- i _ ,t� �1� �. �. "k., . . _ k : � S�� . � , �! j ! . � , _ ,. � , .4 , . ,, , �� , . � . ,� , :vti � =� .J'4.�.� �. 'C :�t..... �. � -e�+ . .�'3, i'�i' .. �.. . ., .� 1.; .�. � 1f 1 . _ . 't'�i �y��4�-��2 ..s� �. r...i.t � , .,. ..,� , r� t � � t t� � �i� . °!?� , .-: -s.•. :2,:� �_�. `s�r "�,�{ ' .,t J 1V ! ✓�- -} ,.., ��ya4 1�.. :.�,�, .�� d� �:r . . .,,, t�.. r , < . �,ii .i, „ �,S � .:.l.il F�d ,r. , �1�.��:1e .# .�l �. �... 1 ,.y�. r �t��P:' �.��. 4 .�\. �.. '�� .,..�� ... . . .. .... T� ER��# f�. .� ,.. .. . ,_�a.;,;;,. ..,.... . �"- S ,... r /,. �l�1 1 �.�.-i� - ��!.t .�i�:':.V76-42 " .. _... __......i .�r � ,�� t�� . , _ _ �_ . :_. . � � . ..+$.�.��..�5�."Sn.:n.�*�- --. .aw.nb� - � .�--- ,t,,, �, _ .�.�u..�,... . �� 't a+ . _ . _ - _._ - - � - a_� - _ --� _ .� ,--- -- - _ � ... ...._ �. ..�i:j.�.� _ p .��.s?'�., ..n . �..: '�.-....� ".`.: _ ;.�, , *.�y , s �: ; " -'^` - _ .. -..�� _�_ ... '#�- . � , _, _ _ . �.. _.:- 1y - ,r __ _ _ --_--._._._� .- r. - -_.� � ! ' � � ',�' ;. � • - - 3 � �l �; '" y , _ ,. � _ , ,. F . , � � `y� } �e , � �. , r �. . b . _ � , t ��. ., • '.� �, � � ,� , }i . � :';:. � � , ^ti - ; � � � � , 1 ��i,yi� � � . . � . 0 � 4 . .., ; . - _:.. ,_ . .: ,2:._ E z ¢° - - I �" - � ; . ' � ,. , � y k : ' ' . �:,. . . . , r. t '. . .; : �, .. - �-i _ � -,� - , � . . -:a , � +r- . �� .�- ...� .: � ; . ..:, ��. ♦ # ,� �.�. - :, i . : '��-' �! T� : A�,��;: .... � � >,.. -.�.-.c.��-, � . .�'hdRd.: _�'.�.. � � - --- � _.._ . � s .�� - � ' . � _ _ - _.: , ! .sAa�.e.� . �_,.. d�r . ..._ „ -._:. _�_ _ � : i y . ._.-, ��, _ .. . .. _ fE , - _ . ' - . . : �! . : . . ..� . ,,,.:; ' . � . i A . � _ � � , . , ., �: � . . - . . � ` � 1 ' `_ '. -• . .,.� ��• „ r�"� . . . . . . . . ... .. .�..�. � � ��...- . . ,� ., " z ..;,.bF+� r ��h.� ,. , . . . . . . .. ... _ . �. .. a ; �. �.' �.�._ +. . . ... � -- � - � ' .�. :. _. _. -.u� ok.�, . . ., q k -.. 1"` ww � �' ;.�:x, :....... :. . .'�'��... . `�+✓ �,.. . .. . �..a. a �.�- _ _ . ` � � ' � � ., !�±. ' ��' :,,° ` _ : .�; ` 'a � - - • ` .. , � z'_ .�.... • �, ,. a. w �_ _ �. � _ _ �_ , • - . , f _� � _ �\ i• :� a* . _.- - .. . :_ - _� - aa. � � � . ` f -,, . � � ---------------- �, ,✓ --------------------- ------------------------------ -- ---- �.�... � , - -- - - - - - - 1. ENLARGED PROPOSED NIAJORS ELEVATIQN (1/16"=1'-0") �� 4 1 , 23 1 20 a�2 $ � 2 4 21 At2 i � �,�° --�.��_-�___.! � r _�._...Y__� _+_..�._._ f \ � � � / � , �.. � 4� - 11 � � 1 \� � - +..,,. � � , �,� �- � . a � ^ �.�� v � ° � F F` ��' ' € . e `-s.��i':sC'-�.:LL.:._:e��._:-.. g,,..��_ �--._^.__ ........�r-� � � _"'� �,,, . ,. °�.._ ..wr.,.. -�,�, __ -. _�. ... .� .. � , ..a . S ._ � . � � . . . . t � 1 �" --- - � - - -- - . . . . , , . . , _ ==-�"`- --- - - , . , � . -- ----- - - . . . . . , . . . . . _ . m .. � �. _ '} - � . , f � � - r�i�,r;��.., . �. ,.� � . !P�' - ,�� p, � (� � � ..� . �� " _ fl t . ^ t� ��,.�Z r. �� f f , . _ ' _._ ,�.._,.. ;- � � .,, .. ;� r.�,-�. :. { + m��*y�,�.��5� "�"' 4'f r� �, ± �� !. . » .- . , . .:.. . � v.t ry'* . ..-...�._� .. _., �. . -•, a � a +r. '� H. �} , • �g.� _ �w.r - 7 1a.c l„ ��+f " " -- . � _ _ _- ,� � . ��. � ..� s . � �, , � , -- t . ... . . � . / ., ___ '� , �" t . . . � .. .. � 'r. � _.'. ., '� . ; :�� ,..e� ... . -...., . . �y , .,�. .; � :.. . - '`' : . � ' 'e: � � -.i. , i 'n-`i,�^ . . . . . .___ _-� _ . _ , . , .�,� � ,. �� ... ._ . - . � , MAftKE`f : �. ,< . .; , � � � ,,,: ,. �_ .�; ��` � � � ..1, *., ... -. . r . . ! ,. � r . 3 .�_ .- , - l �-: .. . ". , �_��. ... a .. , .. ��+. _ .<e �x r -" ' �� .. .�""'- �_. `.•^ � �`�]- s ...�;. ':4�'F . .�,!" , x ,�. �� t.� . �a 4 ti- �i � >.�-- �4 � + . �. . �.�.�.m�!�.._. _�_� ; • � _r _ i_c ., � 'HT� , , _s� ,�_ ,_. _� _ 4 `�', ,�: .� y `vx �s. ,r �s ,<° ,. , � � . _..... .. .,.,.�: � � ,. . . �. - �. ,.. .'7, . ..-.._ t..�,,.. ._.. i , , a � ; : t'� � .:... �.2.._. � : - .� ___, . � . _ _ _._ _ ... .; . _ _-__ _-..�- •� . � -+- : _ .., .,. .- " .. _ . ,.- - �t� ,. ,..,...........'_-�. �. -- �� .��i' _ , , : 3;. , , .�, -.a.-x_� .. .. .. , � . .. � ap -.. . ��° �;: .:, �`, __ ?_ ..• , t � a f �. - ..�.,. r , � � '�_:�.' t "`.i. '��.��, "Sey - � . t-,�,.� > ._ � . , ; r r s , , ; . ., '�,. �: , . ; -..______ _.��-��>� - - ; ; , � � a, . :.:. y . , , � , � � ,, t . :.+, r : - , . ,, w. � , . . , . � , . - Y� - � � �.-... _ ., , � � ,�` .a i �� , 1. e. ( - !` 3, , . t, . � : _ ! �{- �,�?: t. .. 4 : ,+ �, � I ' E . � :. w ..,..' . , , ��. ' ,.. :� i . y .. , , � � .:., . � . . �_.. _.� . � � . , i ' i . � ' � � ' ' ' ` 7 � - - � , . . � ' 'a ' f � s :", I =f i i e r ' �. . _ _.'°t ._ � ( �. . , � �. 1 � ! �� ._ -. � ,ae� � .. .. . . ,r -.; �� , . k _ I � � � � a . - � T � `.� . . .. .. , . . . i . . � �. , � , ._. , .� - - s .�� . _ �� . � . .__ ! �. �.. � ,, � ,i � . �Y. . . . tl✓ � - _. . . .. �.-. �,.>-+�E+ �• � -0�. , .,:.. -, . , - _i �� ; ,ali��p*.-- � -7i; ; ' _. , . .,�. �. .. � . _ - = � .•� .: • - -- ' _ _ . 4 � � � . � ' . C ", , � d �� . a : _ '�+' -� � , F . r , _ ._ .� ' _ y , � . . � � � , � _� . a_, , � _,,,_.. _ � . . .. . .. . . . .. _ . ..,:_ . _ . . - r �-,:.. � ..,_:.. ._ . . . � � °' . ° . . _ . .. .. . . ._. .. - __ _.- � .. . �. .. .. -, .` . . . . <. .r - . . . . . . .... �.�:.. . ' . ... .: . - i � . . . . '-� . . ! . ...... . ,+� . ` :. . y,. . .. . .. . .. �� ,. .... � . � . • � : . _ �. . r� . � I .. . �\ / \ a � . �-._.__�...___.__.._._.___....-'' .... � ""•-____--___..___-__ _.+' 2. ENLARGED PROPOSED I�JIAJO�S ELEVATIC�N (1/16"=1'-0"} /rA , , / � / � � � � � � tf RP i 23 _fl 32 _: , J V �� 1 �l � /��l E � A D __. �� - � � - _ �__ � C(1f'ERTiNO, CALIFORNJA � _ _- �---- --- -- - t[wrClM R00��4ut: t ?rorn[QS �R: � � M V / \ � � / 1 7 � i { l �/ � � ` � � ' ■ ! ! �/ � �/ Q 3. t 2. 1 G o z � o . � o �� 7 Mlf.f M f NIlAIIAM ■O. Sil l iE � Y00 rouMr�:■ vic+r c• s s a.• t s.a � p o ]"') ��/ �� E T + 1 + r t � 1 3. EXTERIORPLASTERSYSTEM __________________._.. _ ___ ______ _ _ _ . � `_ _ _ _ _ _ � I 9 ,_ , _ ,� _ _ 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM - `,, ,' �. .� , . STOREFRONT SYSTEM ' -- - . �.�.�_.� ,.,� - � . . .. _�. � :.t� __.__ � . _ , . _. . . . .�:_ , � . .. . �.�. �. _.. . , . ..� ��. ..,�.�._,� �.��.�. .. .� � A_ � _ __ .. � .�.. , w�� .��.�:, ..�n . � - I 5 CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY D � ,. _ . ., .. .. . _ , . .� - - , � �,..�„ ��.s� � � ..� "---�. _ : �. __ .. . �.:�__ . . � _ � .. . . . _. . , _ .. . . _ , � :. _ .. �,. OOR - _ .. ,. . �i � -- b � - - .�-�. �a.�,..y _ � . . ___ . _ � � _ . € _. _ .. _ �_��. . _�..____ . - , ; ., • : - . -�u , �.-.., w, � . -- w-. .s.. :� �� f _-_.. � . .. .. ... . .:.._ _� _ , , ;. _ ; ..� � .; � .. �,..,,._..�.>, � , ,�:.� . .. ,. � ��,... :.�. 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET !N `'. ,, , , : --- _ _ __ _ __ _ ___ _ _---.-----___....____- ---_ __.____.__ _ __--__ _ __-- __..._ _______ _ _ _ ___ INUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM MAJORS SaUTH ELEVATION 1"=40'-0" 7. CLERESTQRY WINDOWS ( � 8. PLASTER REVEAL 3 -,�:� � .� d� 9. HOLLOW METAL �Oa►R ,�.��.��`� ��' �> 3; 4 � 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR `�`� �` �` ?�- � �- �. �. r - �� «�� ; i 11. WOOD LINTEL . y ��. -�� ' . - � �,� r� -� � � � � � � �- ��- � 12. EXPOSED WDOD RAFTER ` � �,� .�:' �' ._:_.. . ------- -- ; , 13. WOOD TRELLIS �. � -{� ,;� ' t . . , � . . . . , . . ---- ; . - . - �._..... ' . . -0, .. . , , . , . ., . . . . � , � � �.w , . . . _ � . , . . 14. CUT STONE VENEER . _.z � . � � . , , . --- -.. 15. PRECAST TRIM �� h � �, . � , _ � � ,� .� . . , - -- - _c ��.� , % , .� � . _ ,. . - , � . ; . 16. PRECAST C N OR ICE � , � . =--- � � i ---------. � _._�_ ---� ---- , . - =- ' , _ � � ��' �r �.�: �� _ 17. METAL WALL TRELLIS �� DRIVE THRU WINDOW 1. MAJ�RS EAST ELEVATION (1/16"=1'-0") 19. DRlVE THROUGH CANOPY 20. BANNERS � 21. PRECAST MEDALLiON �� . � T � ? �-�-� - 22. NEW COVERED ARCADE � �� ,� �W -.� - - �. 23. LOW STONE SEAT WALL _ _ �,� - ,�� : 24. NEW FREE STANDING ENTRY ;� r:�.uc»:�i�� ;,.� Bx��zE ��i >>�f�� i'k�i ► a i,:��t;�:k� PFL•17 i�: L.,1.�IRF:R( it 1('ULOIt \t).6J1 ic�i c-��.c�x ��>.�_� �c i c��i.c�K.c�.s�s 25 REPAINT EXISTING BUILDING r+�{ + ��'\ !�l'i1ti {; EI�,. C'C):iR.SF [) 11c)�f 11"1\1)011 HR 111H. �t,t�`n1.C:1R � i�� " �c}.11 29 RI\'ER S 111) �c>.z��,�:�v�i:�.., -r :OLf?F:\ ('11:�L1('L;" "N.1�iK(l' � F.�K11k:RS 11.�1.ti �(„ 26. NE1N GUARD RAlL T� MATCH EXISTING COLORS 8� MATERIALS 27. EXISTING �'REES TO REAAAIN , . = :8; �! . �. 13� � �� j _ t �_ ._f' . .- ... �'' � . \ �,:. . ° � 'Z . . . , ,,. _ � � �''� q „� . �. .. �. : • - - e , -. . ' .. __. . . _,_ _ �. _ f .,r . ._..,_ �,�' . . _...�, • � "� - . . . . . � . . _. ,d.__.._ . '� _ ' . " � , . = � � .: �_._ .�.,_m_ � � t� _...� ----•----- _ _ . _ . .. ---.-,..�. _ �-. . , �\ { , . .._ _ � .-^_ . ,_%` � , s . , . .� -.�-d„n--_.� . � , � ... ...., . , � . - .,. -,. ' , . . ' . . . ..,�._..... i .__ .-_...e- - . . .. ..`.,.. .:. . .......-...-.�-.. -�,-....__..-,_ r._. ...w_...___ � -�_....._...-..-._.�._.m. .�. �..,,_,._,,,..-.� • � . ' � � �~- j � , ...,� , _. .-_ _.._._.. _ .m._. �.�o..-.� _ - . . , � .. ^ � _ , , -- . . � . • . , . � � .. tf I � � � � . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . , . , . . _ , , �: . . , . , . . . . , . . ry . ; • _ . . .. . , , . . . , , . . , , . ,. .. . • . , • �,�w - F-�__ •.�� ; . - . . . , . I . . • , " ' ' � . . i . .1 . . �ewrw.: . .- � _....,. ._ . . � ___ . , , ---- - - - -- - - � � . , • - --- _._ - - -- - --- - - - - ' . i -� . . ,- _-.....: _ . : . � _._ -- : � ---- � . _ � _,� -- - - ,-� �..-�- _ - �:= --- .. � �srtiw�arsa��ew�M� ' • . _ . . _ . • . . . . ' _ _ . .a-.c ___ . . _....-_..,, • �_ - . I ' � �, 2. ENLARGED MAJORS SOUTH ELEVATION t1/1�"=1'-0") EXISTING BUIIDINGS TO REMAIN AND RECEIVE NEW PAINT ' _.��_ .�------ � --; z � `� --- ----_�__�� _ `� 3 ; �,:.__��.,____._._.._....�...�_-,..�._.� �.� ,, �� ?, � ..R__ � ._ � ,' � t � � � ; - �_ - � __- _._..�_ ,.____-_.•�-'' `'`..._. _ -�,.,�„ , . . _..�,. ' . . . . - . . ' •� , � �� .. _. . .. , �.: , .. . ,: • , , .. . . . . . . , . , __...�. .-_ , . , , . , . . _ - �------ _� ___._.,�,._�_____ _ . �_ ._ � ._ , , . ._ � • . • ._.. vx_.. . _� _� _ __�.____.___,�..._. � _ _ - - - _ •� _ ,„;._. .. . . . . , ., , -� _ _ , . � ,�- n �__._.��._.. ._.___ �--1-...� .---- .�- � �, ---�,_-.,'�" �_ -�...-�_......�.�.�-.._�.._. .�_ _ . . � . _ . . . , . , • , , . . . � • � . .. • . . ; •-�. �. � . - " . ' • � -; -- '----�------• --- � - - - . � . . - , 3. ENLARGED MAJOf�S S�llTH ELEVATION {1l'� 6"=1'_p") � �A J � � � KR#" ?3. f333 V � � � � / � . � � � � �� ETAIL � � _ � CUPERTINO, �ALJFORNlA ) it(M11;lf1 R$�111G:4��(S .� i�Atrdk3 �w: ••` � � 1I � � �� ) ■ r � � L E 1/A T 1 � � . 1 O . � O •�S wCl�w s�{Sr wD. Sn�7[ ��r:� 1 \% �� y 4 •; � • . -. ♦ • � E W C a 6 S a S t 5 .. . „ t � � � � � � � I � -�T- '^�'� � "� : ,. , �: � , , � ,' - � -, „ k ._ ;� � �` .L�i= ,,s _ - ,, ,; s� _, NEW �TE AID PLON StGN. DE3lGN TO MATC�I � _._.__ >_� . _ � ,5 _.�, �_------� _ � i ----_ __ - - --- ^- ` .� ; , ,. . _ .� , �. � _ PROJECT � .� _ -- -- - __... , �_: . . . . ._ , _ -- ' - MONUI�NT SiGN � � �, ____. ' y , f � „ .�,. U , T � , c ' :r: ,: ,. , ' .': ;; , — .Mw .... ..._ ,� ..... ..� �. _ �. __ _. _� _.._ � NEW tNTEGRAL COIORED 3TMAPEO CONC�iETE ._ i�i.� i�i i�+'+�— , ` � r .;< : ; � � �, F; �� ,; �. � � . . . PAVING - �, - .b . ' � . __ � _. - �; ' � * � . - - __ , _ _ _ , _ .. :.; i � ' � NEW PAD 2 ` _ __ _ _ ___ -- i ; , sMOOn� c�o�n cawc�� erwo _ _ ._ ------_ _ ., NEW PAD 3 , -- - � __ r v • ' � � . , � � . ... ; s,o5o sF : ,,,� ; � � '� s,�oa sF ,. , LANDSCAPED FtNGER � � . , _ _ - - - - ,�� ----- --------------- -- - _ .. , _ _ _--- - - . __ . __ . r . . --__. , . : , . , - ° _____ ---- MEW STOh1E WVD6C.APE BOILARD AI� UQFfTNlG �< � � � , >;. _ 1 � — -- . , , . - ._ � � .. .,:: , w ,u- .. , :, �, - � �� a,. °^- L , : ; .. . _._.. . � z..,_ __ � �,, . .� . �E:�. � � ; � ;, . -. . _ _._ ..�.��. . , _ � , -, , ..�W,. � .._- ..�. v ' _ —__ .---_'—_ � ; ' - �.. � �; , IANOSCAPSht3 AT MEDtAN ISI�Np ---- � - -- ---- ,. � , : , , , n r � � �..' •� � s,- .� � � , • , : ` k .. � �� N „ . . `` t a . � � � s � � ,: ' 3 .. p .� f , �. -� � ..__._. �. . � � _..__._�__._ ____...___. .----__ '..._-.-__. ..__ . . a s �ur,�R� _ �� __ _..,. _� NEW # � , _ � � � . - PAD 1 .�. , � � . ; ; , „�. , ;:A��;� , � - - , 17,340 SF , , ----- �., t ; �. .., ..:_-._. • ,. :,� • • • i .,� .. � . Y} � � � � i • • _..__.. � ' �. ` ' � ,, y , 1 � . _ _ . r: : MEMt INTEGRAL COLORED STNIAPED (:UNCRET'E X � � . . .., :,: „ '� "` , PAVING WITH SMOOTN tNTE(�RA�L COLORED BANDS , . ,� ,, >. �. \ t � ... ,► . " � � � �. i i �` 't.^ � �I�" . . � � � � ; ` �., f �� ]� . ;� �..-. ..� . a.. a � � * : # � � k. � � � ! �z . . �. . � n „ � , �; .. ;� � ; •- . , . %� .� • . .� . � —�, �.�, 'v l � . - � . - - . _ .. , ' ! R +" +� " � � <� � C u. � � • , � . . ::� { . � '..� � � _ .. ' ' .�.::; �! ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT MAIN LNTRY ' ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT RITE AID �, �_,� � _ .- SCALE: 1 —30 -0 ' � ' SCALE: 1 "=30'-0" BENCHES AND lMIDBCAPE POTS FOR OUTDOOR .� SEA7ING �` CART CORRAL ---- -- — �._ �� ---- STONE A(:CENT WALL FEATl�2E � f r --�-�.....�. �..� _ ...�.,�.�._..,.._ ___._ __ _ . TABLES AND UMBRELLAS FOR OUTDOOR SEATII� �'` ~`��,. ` � LOW STOI�E SEAT WALL ,, . ; ; . -- , ,, , i I -r�' i � r ` , � I { I �` f} S�EG x�l wP-° i �� • I _ - _ — --� , � } _ .-... ` __.._�__�_ A�N F'I.MA "I`CiEES _ __ I � { ; , . -- �i' s � - _ _ _ _ . � � ,� �_�_i � �. � . � � ' � .. � _ .._ �'� I . � .... — � f � �_ _ . P. � � y� , � � � � i _ .:.. ._ �- � ._. -. ,,,.�- • - ..,. . - � . . - - xy � ___ 1 . . —+F�:an, _ ' . � . . �- -- - — r . _ ... ..� ..... .... ... ._. ...... ..... A �''`� _ _ �--�� .� . . " . � '_ .. ._. . . � � � , _ � _ - : - � ; ; � _ -- �_ _..-- - _�_ _ (�OLORED STAMPED CONCREfE PA _ " T _ ,...._. _ T : -- ,-.- -- - --- - � _ _ � ' j .,- � - _ _ �:- . , !� ' --, - �. - VING --__ � � _ , , x,. . . . , ,,-, �. �. - - _ �. . � _ - . , � . , . :. . y .: . . . . , . : . ____ .� � __.L� w . �.___�____ � . . . . , . . ..,. _ - . . . . . . . _ INTEGR/1L I + a � � � � � ,� ,•.. . '�;:% � , `� ,.�`" . . „ . WITH ALTERNATING G COtVCRETE 8J1NOS - ~=-� ° , � �; � . � �r �s� . � - � - � �a a , � � w , _. w ._ _ � ( .. x '.. � .. �', :> - �_Y . x ... . .. �.,�� / ty F � z k� � �� }' Y , �Y ' �'�"'�� r �\ iI � x �� } ^ � � r � } Yx � — � � � � � / �' i �_ �r�s4y a y ''�, ��... a+ 3tr . � r` � ,� xr /`� , �.^ . � a• _� � ..:_. � . . .,�;'' c_ `y . € 4 . ;x % ;� . : � :�: � � � � � . . .� , . � �. . � 4., k � ':�'� .:� �' ;� . �.,�,�. ��' � � �� `tS� ."�,.' � ',x .�• f� �,� � � � . .' _ J` ,, , _ A , .. _ a� , � . _ -- a �+ y . � } " _..__ .. �--. _ ...... . ..........._. ....,...... . I . : .. � , .� � - . . - .., . . - .. .. _ p P. . . . , : . Y : w� ;�, r�. f *� " . ` _ . �: . . . . . ''`�cl. WATER FFATURE __ . �., .... _ � � � , , , , , . . , ; � � , _ ...._ . _. .. . , , _ _ __ , .: � � �. _ - � _ ' - � , .1 _ _ _ , �., . _.._ � � �� - -- �'� . , . _ : - ' . . _ _ __------ r� � .:t¢ � . _ � ------- ----- - - _ _ --- _ -- . .. _ � - _ _- -- - :. _ _ � = � _. , � -- � � _ � ___�� . _ _ - � x:. ___- _ �.: -"'� � � � _....__.rr._.__._ � �_ � ._.�--��_ _:.�-- �� ENLA►RGED SITE PLAN AT PLAZA FEAT�I�E '" ENLARGED SITE P�AN A� PLAZA FEAT�IRE / � a_ � w , ' SCALE: 1-1 Q-0 `�� SCAIE: 1"=1 U'-0" � � �� K R P t 2 3, 0 3 2 t-~`� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �ETA I�. �% � ,�� CUPERT�l�O, CALtFt�RN�A /��,/\ J /� \ � ) j / J ��J f `�' c� t�s ao a�? �r4fxsa� t��r�s r �� . .. , F �i4 � �7q� � rr � � tiI � V � � � � • 1 � � V . � , „ 1 � aAVa3w�w ri[ar t� e� a.• t�.:] 4 6 G `. i f �� j� 1\ � ! V � t 1 '�. z L��+�7�� , . . � 2. PAINTED METAL CUTfER --- _ _---��g:, ; ,� � . . _ t6 � ,.�.� ��; -- - -----1 3. EXTERIOR PLASTER SYSTEM � ; � � � �::� ��-�� • . 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM � *--- ------ - �p ._.,�, <� STOREFRONT SYSTEM � ' T - � �� , . f . � .�. � , �-��- , >, � _ 15 � � ; i b ', . --- �� 5. CLEAR GLASS STQREFRONT ENTRY DOOR ; � ----- �"'� . , , 6. FROSTED SPA�NDREL GLASS SET fN �--- � � �� ALUMINIJM STOREFF�ONT SYSTEM � F � - - �� --- - -- �a� • . . m � 7. CLERESTORY 1NINDOWS `--- � 4 , 8. PLASTER REVEAL �I�- � � � �� . __ _-_ _: a, 9. HOLLOVN METAL DOQR �o OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 1. EtVLARGED MAJC�R 1 E[�TF�Y ELEVATION 11. WOOD LINTE� 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER 13. VNOOD TRELLIS 14. CUT STONE VENEER ,�--�,� ; 15. PRECAST TRIM � ` '`� 16. PRECAST CORNICE , -- --___--- ---__ _ _ 11 � __ _ _ i� 17. METAL WALL TRELLIS ��, ' a � 18. DRIVE THRU WiNDOW • ` . � 19. DRIVE THROI�GH C�IOPY _ �$ j�'` _. E��,�, ,� '�'� ---�- . to; � � 20. BANNERS ! � /' � . _-- 21. PRECAST MEDALLlON � ' � �- . . � � ,�`� � � �" • - '�� 22. NEW COVERED ARCADE ___-, � �' . . ,' " _ . __, ; . " ✓ - � \ _.. _ _ �; _ _ __ -------- � �. 23. LOW STQNE SEAT WALL - �� , � , '- - _ ;15 24. NEW FREE STANDING ENTRY ; � �� " �� ` .� � 25. REPAINT �XISTING BUlLDING � � � - 26. NEW GUARD RAIL TO MATCH EXISTING r� Y. _' �� , � --- � - �4; 27. EXISTiNG TREES TO REMAIN ' 2. ENLARGED MAJOF� 2 ENTRY ELEVATION KEYMAP - - . �� ,u � � , t � _ _ __ _--- ., � __ .. , ------ �` , � .: ,� - - �---- -----� � � _ ; --- � , � Z 1 - - 16 ; � � _ - - -- --�----- -�- ;. � 1 _ . i {. ,__ , _: . _ m. .:._ ..:, � � — — � _ � jv \ .va�.�-v-a«�1..�..-�.-a..r�,. � e e--, ._�:-t.-t � .. r_,..-� �; -- ---- �q : � ;; a� , � � �� . ;� __ ; ;� .. �. �. � ._ � �. 9 � .. _ . _ _-- _ .._...------- ,.-, � - � _. _. ` �\ �. . _ _._�._. ._ _ ; 4 ; t� ' ' � ' �_ � ;' ': �, t r; °, af+� A#r NEYV NEYV NEW ---� � . M�4JOR bWOR MA.lOR � , . _ . --4 , 3 2 1 } / � . -- -----=� . . . � _ i �. . 4` . ...._ _�._.J._J.. x � 1 � T _. � f . - ,.' ., ` . .� ` 6, , , ____ _. �---'k - -- - . _ _ �. _ , �- ._ � 3. ENLARGED MAJOR 3 ENTRY ELEVATION PUV J�ARK ��?s°�2 . � E T/ H M � s Q E �TEAD RETAIL CUPERTlNO, CALIFORNlA "�,"��a°R,�u`� . P.a..`p� ��: �NLA R� ED EL EVA TI ONS 02. ,� �� S M O� i M � M I S Y A 1� R Q. S U i f L � S 0 9 ��' =1 •_ O . 0 8' � 6' Ia' � u... �. �Sa,�SO,�a P W l� A R K E T � ^ �_� �� 1. CLAY TILE ROOF b ^ 4 ,� 2. PAINTED METAL GUTTER � ��' ; 4 3. EXTERIOR PLASTER SYSTEM - -�- 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM SECTION 1. ENLARGED TYPICAL PAD ELEVATION STOREFRONT SYSTEM 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN � ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM - 7. CLERESTORY WINDOWS - � � � 8. PLASTER REVEAL �"� , ;, . '7, 15 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR 15 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 3 � � � �� ,�� ; -� 11. WOOD LINTEL 11 � ; - __ �� 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER �.� ar �, p`k� "��_. ,�$., 13. WOOD TRELUS ' � � ` � 14. CUT STONE VENEER a � � �� '�' 4 _ �� :,�.,�.,�. 15. PRECAST TRIM i � ' � _ �..�,. ... - _� .: _ . :. .�...; 16. PRECAST CORNICE --- - - 17. METAL WALL TRELLIS � 18. DRIVE THRU WINDOW SECTION 2. ENLARGED TYPICAL PAD ENTRY ELEVATION 19. DRIVE THROUGH CANOPY 20. BANNERS 21. PRECAST MEDALLION 22. NEW COVERED ARCADE ��''`' � f � 23. LOW STONE SEAT WALL - � �- _ , . ,. ,.. - 24. NEW FREE STANDING ENTRY � 25. REPAINT EXISTING BUILDING 15 y � � �s 26. NEW GUARD RAIL TO MATCH EXISTING �f a �� r 27. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 3 � �� , 4 � - 3 � i 4 SECTION 3. ENLARGED TYPICAL PAD ENTRY ELEVATION . �� `�� l � 1..�� j�� cf � �� } �,{� `� #`�.,��'�� ` �� , � }�� s�.� '.�``< �� ' .�' �{ �`�i -� �� "�;• ; � , r � �t''�. �'�x• �� _ t,� ' �° ��`,�`�`- - � _ � x � �� h �4 �-? �;.;� :,�' i� ;" ''' ; e �� f � .�.. ,� x , � ` � "� iF � �.. ��, '�7".> .�'�`f l.. � � � t .•�,., � ' �'i� ti F �"Y � � �. � � .. � �(i � `�' . � ��. �``�`r . "4.�:�* . . �� .��t ��' -�tii. . ,4, `-, ' S 4_ �'' _ � 4 ti y i � . ^ � . �_ � � � � � '; "�� ' � � � � F / �` » ... � T � � r � �:N n@u� _.._. � ' wr ;_.'; �r.-. �n .. , 4 �..:_- ... __..��,,..�. ' ...� - . . � �......,....i.w.,, "" . •^ . � � • �� T � �� . , _ .µ :�� ,z,:: t �� ii� 4. SITE SECTION AT ENTRY DRIVE 5. SITE SECTION AT ENTRY DRIVE � � M A KRP123.032 RKET H � / 0 ME STEAD R E TA I L CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 1 t S M N 0 R T N W I�S t R O R 3 U I ' M E N L A R G E D E L E V A T 1 0 N S A N D E I ,zoo S C T 0 N S 02. °., ° ,,e-=, •_o- 0 8' 16� 24' Y UNTAI N VIEW CA ! S D.9 { S.0 7 D 0 � .- I �� --_ I I W 1. CLAY TILE ROOF 2. PAINTED METAL GUTTER 3. EXTERIOR PLASTER SYSTEM 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 7. CLERESTORY WINDOWS 8. PLASTER REVEAL 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 11. WOOD LINTEL 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER 13. WOOD TRELLIS 14. CUT STONE VENEER 15. PRECAST TRIM 16. PRECAST CORNICE 17. METAL WALL TRELLIS 18. DRIVE THRU WINDOW 19. DRIVE THROUGH CANOPY 20. BANNERS EXISTING MAJOR 5 EXISTING SHOPS 21. PRECAST MEDALLION 22. NEW COVERED ARCADE _ 23. LOW STONE SEAT WALL ( i �� ►+ ! � i 24. NEW FREE STANDING ENTRY � ! f' f' � EXISTING FACADE AND � 25. REPAINT EXISTING BUILDING � EXISTING FACADE AND 1 1 3 � ARCADE TO REMAIN � 26. NEW GUARD RAIL TO MATCH EXISTING � ARCADE TO REMAIN t-- �� : `-i !�- `!�� r 27. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN - - �_ _.... _ � ._.,. _�_ - -- - - --�-- - -- -- -� �1_ .... � _ _� ._._ _ .... � _ � ..,_ ,..._ _ _, _ � _� ,! � _ ,,,,,�"'''�_�( _ .,.. � ! _. _ � . �---i � - -- � � _ _ " - _ .,.._ , �.... _ _ _ „_,. _. ,.,.. _ .�- _� ,_ KEYMAP �4 ,5 2a � , 2 ,a ,s Za � y — -- --- �}� . � -;.,--�,= �. � � --- - -- - i . Tl!�. Ih I r i� ' I I��l �'t j � J I � ~�i,..r, -,� '�{ I I r �S ' �-��' i :�� I � � - � � i i i� �TT"'?f_' ' � � ti �-,,—�. u � � �� .� ,,� 1: - - �_— --�— — --__._---- — -- , _ ' � � � � „ — -��v^✓:^. � v`sti=�v.°rr�,-o,�,,-w=n�r'�, �wvvu �.�.� _. _ � z 1 ` ! t Yn�°�, i��l1lT' - . � . � � � r' : . • . . 1''W . , . - - - x., — - , ' � � � �{+"�4-•- - � , : ; \ _ � S _ ,, , � , — . , � �"�� o � � , � �- - Z � ' � � � i - �� - - - � �.� ..�+ :.t � t ,:j � ! � � I I � ./'� t � �� , , 'I - "-, � _ —, ! i; I � � � �`,.1LL1L.._ _ - �.� - — � -- _ _ __- --- � I � ,e -- _ : - , -; _ ._ , , , ; . . � -- -- � � 1 AAAJOR ', , I � � � < •- , ; ; � -, 5 c _ — 1 i � � � T . , - � � � . _ , : � . � + 1 , ;.; ;.�:,c - a �-�., ___ ._ _ . u � .. ; _ -- _ _ ___ -- _ _. ___ _ � 1 PROPOSED SIGN AREA PROPOSED SIGN AREA 1. TYPICAL EXISTING MAJOR TENANT AND SHOPS ENTRY REMODEL K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET/HOME TEAD RET - � S AIL CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA RENNE�X RODMIGUE3 t PAFTNERS .N� E N L A R G E D E N T R Y E L E V A T I 0 N S =�-- � Z. � Q. � 0 1/8'=1' 4 4 S N 0 N T M W N 1 S Y A N R D. 3 U I T E � 2 D 0 YOUNTAIN �..SO.,.s.��° P W M A R K E T -- � e� 16� Z4� L � � � LEGEND � -�_ - - - �, " �==== C==== ' � �_--- �:__: � � 1. CLEAR GLASS ENTRY DOOR ' ' - - �� _ _ _ _ � �_-__ 2. EXTERIOR WALL - i =' - - - 3. WOOD TRELLIS ABOVE 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN STOREFRONT � 4 � WINDOW SYSTEM - - �- - - � 5. LINE OF BUILDING EDGE ABOVE , 6. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR ' � � � 7. HOLLOW METAL DOOR � � � -- � � � 6 7 PAD 4 FLOOR PLAN PAD 1 FLOOR PLAN 2 4 1 1 4 2 108' 100' r r r � � r r r-- � I I I KEYMAP � � ' � � � , � , � � � ' � AD /1D � � L I I I J L J �� PAD 1 - - - - �I L - _ _ J L _ _ _ J L - - - J L _ - - J L _ - - J I I � � �� - J � - _ _ L - - _ J - I � � � � � � � � I L____J L__ _J PAD 3 FLOOR PLAN PAD 2 FLOOR PLAN +��'� K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET H ME TEAD N S RET L � AI CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETMROD�IOYES ! PA�TMERS INC PA D 8 U I L D I N G FL 0 0 R PLA N S O 2. 1 O. 1 O N 0 R T H 1/16'�1'-0' �� S N 0 � T M W N 1 S Y A N R 0. 3 U 1 f E / 2 0 0 0 16' 32' 48' MOUNTAIN �� .SO...s.�,�� P W M A R K E T LEGEND 1. CLEAR GLASS ENTRY DOOR -- � _ _ — -- - i i i i i i i i —-- 2. EXTERIOR WALL — — i i i i i i i i i 3. WOOD TRELLIS ABOVE 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN STOREFRONT i I WINDOW SYSTEM 5. LINE OF BUILDING EDGE ABOVE 6. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 7. HOLLOW METAL DOOR 8. TRASH ENCLOSURE 9. TRASH COMPACTOR I 4 � � � rn rn n = = m m Z D I m .� � I q �� ao I 5 � If II II II II � II II `— II II II II II II II II II KEYMAP � � �� I � ________ I ' �� I 9 � � o s MAJOR 1 _ _ A I a z MAJOR 1 FLOOR PLAN K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET/HOME AD N S TE RETA I L � ____ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETH RODR16UE5 !►ARTNE�S INC M q J 0 R 1 F L 0 0 R P L A N O 3. I I. � O / 4 3 N 0 R T X W N 1 S Y A N N D. S U 1 T E O L. � O. � O N O R T H / t o o �� —��—� 0 16' 32' 48� YOUNTAIN �� .s�.,.�.�� P W M A R K E T ' ' LEGEND �-- J � - - - - - 1 - _ -- - -� - ---- - -- - -- --- -- -- - -- , , -- -- -- , � - �� -- -- - 1. CLEAR GLASS ENTRY DOOR ' � � � � � � � � � � � � - - 2. EXTERIOR WALL 3. WOOD TRELLIS ABOVE 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM � 5. LINE OF BUILDING EDGE ABOVE � 6. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 7. HOLLOW METAL DOOR 8. TRASH ENCLOSURE 9. TRASH COMPACTOR � � � D m � � n = = m r I'r1 � � 4 m D ° � o� � � � � KEYMAP � I _ � - 7 I — 9 �� 9 � I �� 8 2 Q 6 6 � 2 MAJO MAJO I 8 I s � I I i I -- MAJOR 3 FLOOR PLAN MAJOR 2 FLOOR PLAN K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PVl/ MARKETIHOME TEAD E N � S R TAIL CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETNRODRICUES t PARTNE�3 IMC MA J 0 R S 2� 3 FL 0 0 R PLA N S O 2. 1 O. 1 O N 0 R T H t/�e'=t'—o' 1 1 S N O � T H W H 1 S Y A N q D. S U I T E / 1 0 0 0 16� 32' 48' YOUNTAIN VIEW CA • S O.f { S.0 7 0 0 D � M A R K E T r —��--��,—;�� 4. CLEAR GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 5. CLEAR GLASS STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR 6. FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS SET IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 7. CLERESTORY WINDOWS S. PLASTER REVEAL 9. HOLLOW METAL DOOR 10. OVERHEAD ROLL-UP DOOR 2 � 11. WOOD LINTEL 12. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTER 13. WOOD TRELLIS _ _ _ _ ae� 14. CUT STONE VENEER 15. PRECAST TRIM 16. PRECAST CORNICE � 17. METAL WALL TRELLIS 12 18. DRIVE THRU WINDOW 3 ' e 19. DRIVE THROUGH CANOPY 19 ' �� 20. BANNERS 21. PRECAST MEDALLION 18 22. NEW COVERED ARCADE 4 23. LOW STONE SEAT WALL _ _ _ , 24. NEW FREE STANDING ENTRY 25. REPAINT EXISTING BUILDING 26 NEW GUARD RAIL TO MATCH EXISTING 10 BUILDING SECTION AT PAD BUILDING 2 27. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN � � � �� 16 ------ 3 22 5 �2 BUILDING SECTION AT MAJOR 1 K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET H ME TEAD ET L � S R AI CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETH ROO�IOUES t �ANTNER3 INC 8 U I L D I N G S E C T 1 0 N S 0 Z. � �. � � 1 1! N 0 R T M Yf N 1 S Y A N R D. S U 1 T E / 2 0 0 1�E�=1�-O� 0 8� 16' 24' YOUMTAIN ��Ew �. . S o... s.a �� P W M A R K E T '. ' '-' �_ �. �.vi��.R� i � rr�v 5. METAL FACIA, METAL ROOF � ,�� BEYOND � � ` ' a� I � � u� ` � � . . .: u� 6. LINE OF ROOF ABOVE � � � - 7. HOLLOW METAL DOOR � , � , � � �° , . - - � 8. ROLL UP DOOR � '� � I LOADIN(3 � - LOADIN(3 NuuoR e�rorio NwoR 2 e�r 9. 3 cu yd METAL BIN � � � �oR s �. �� 1 0. 4 c u y d M E T A L B I N n .. —_ � a w i r a c 3 4o�wmc3 � � �� 11. 96 GAL. TOTER Z 9 ' ' � = , . , i� � �A� , � � NwoR s L oo�cic� �r RECYLCE BIN b 3 - � b� s�ronm b � b� auuoRz � - . .; � J . � _ 12. GREASE/TALLOW BIN WITH : . . .. - : . _ - . . : ' � . CATCH BASIN AS . _ SECONDARY CONTAINMENT _ � 13. 96 GAL. TOTER ORGANIC � ., - . BIN (SHOWN SHADED) . NOTE 30 ACCESS ALLOWED TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 5: PLAN � ELEVATIONS TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 4: PLAN � FRONT ELEVATION AT FRONT OF EACH BIN NOTE: EACH BLDG ENTRANCE LOCATED AT NEW MAJOR 1(48�000 SF MARKET) LOCATED AT NEW MAJORS 2$ 3(31 �350 SF RETAIL EACH) WILL HAVE RECEPTACLES FOR �MAJOR HAS COMPACTOR IN LOADING AREA FOR ORGANIC WASTE) (EACH MAJOR HAS COMPACTOR IN LOADING AREA FOR TRASH) TRASH, RECYCLE� AND ORGANIC WASTE 13 11 10 5 3 1 5 1 13 11 4 1 3 5 1 5 � 9 5 3 1 5 1 1T�• 14'�8' 13' ' — — 6 2 I Z � � � I � . .:; .._\ I � ( _ .� ` � � � . `.•: � I � . I g � ;. � Z , I 6 �� •� I I � :. _ ' � � 6 9 L� f-� b° � 4 . b° � 4 b° � TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 3: PLAN � ELEVATIONS TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 2: PLAN & ELEVATIONS TRASH ENCLOSURE TYPE 1: PLAN & ELEVATIONS LOCATED AT EXISTING MAJOR 5(25,400 SF RETAIL) LOCATED AT EXISTING SHOPS (5�790 SF RETAIL) LOCATED AT EXISTING PAD (2�500 SF RESTAURANT $ 3�644 SF RETAIL) LOCATED AT NEW PAD 1(17�340 SF RETAIL) SIM. LOCATED AT EXISTING MAJOR 4(20�000 SF RETAIL) LOCATED AT NEW PAD 2(6,500 SF RESTAURAN� (AT PAD 1: SOME 96-GALLON TOTER BINS MAY BE FOR ELECTRONIC WASTE) (AT MA�JOR 4: BOTH 3 cuyd BINS FOR RECYCLE� COMPACTOR FOR LOCATED AT NEW PAD 3(2,400 SF RESTAURANT $ 3�650 SF RETAIL) TRASH) LOCATED AT NEW PAD 4(4,000 SF RESTAURANT 8� 3,200 SF RETAIL) K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 � PW MARKET H ME TEAD RETAI L CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETN ■ODRICYES t PARTNERS INC T R A S H E N C L 0 S U R E D E T A I L S 0 Z. � �. � � 4 1 S M 0 � T M YY N 1 S Y A N R D. 3 U I T E f I 0 0 1�B�=1 �-O� 0 8' 16' 24' YOUNTAIN �..so.,•s.�,�� P W M A R K E T HOMESTEAD ROAD HOMESTEAD ROAD x � �� ,. k � � = X - .�. � k ,.y. . x - � i �:kl ;r. x X,` I Y y . " EXISTIN � � " " � Y " y x RETAIL x �` "�`' �r � NOT �— x BUILDIN � � y'�x > A � � � � �� PART � � �- � - � - > > r x � O� O . _,. : U „ < w U �`: ��: ,r W � J k;.� �� ,v� _1 . . . � �. �. . � � �� ,� . ` � , ,, . > � � � ,. � : w' • F � ' � O I EXISTING � ? O O EX � � _ , _ O „.. PAD � • „ (� 6,144 SF I • m (� 6,144 SF ' P_ �, < x x m I I • I • y �� . . - . Z . . Z , � � . k : ' s �' . y ,. ; I �,. �, :�._ ,.. �, , ¢ � Q Q �: , �, .. . Q � , .. : .. 4 � -- � N � . . . N „ „ � w._ _ , ;. � � ��.. � ,��. -- LL = Z IL �- � , ��z � �� . ..,. �.... , .. ., .... Z _ � � _ ,: _ .� � _ .� �. ,. .�., . , _ . EXISTING I a EX�ST�N� �: . � P HAS E 2 • +��",�` �� Q SHOPS EXISTING SHOPS � .� ` ��- , NOT 5,790 SF I RETAIL w 5,790 SF A W EXISTING EXISTING NEW NEW NEW BUILDING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING � PART I MAJOR 5 MAJOR 4 MAJOR 3 MAJOR 2 MAJOR 1 I 0 MAJOR 5 MAJOR 4 MAJOR 3 MAJOR 2 MAJOR 1 � � 25,400 SF 20,000 SF 31,350 SF 31,350 SF 48,000 SF 25,400 SF 20,000 SF 10,000 SF 38,000 SF 44,600 SF I I I � ' I s �.. �..f � I I � , , � � �` � I '� � �x�� , a s i # � °>M;«�• - . .. - - � - - - - - j . . •�i. �• �f . . . • �� ! i• � �1• • �• • �• .. " r..�. _ ' .. <: � a�': �, � _ F �� r; Y �,' _ . . 4 . . .. ... _. �....4 � � �� ' . . � . S,�.r,' �v.�F ._ �"�... . �., z��'W,e"edw.� ;a ' °' ,. � . a°� dv� PHASE 1 • DEMOLISH EXISTING PAD BUILDING @ THE CORNER OF HOMESTEAD PHASE 1 PARKING ANALYSIS & FRANCO AND PARKING LOTS WITHIN SHADED AREA • CONSTRUCT FOUR PAD BUILDINGS BUILDING AREA 149,934 SF • INSTALL NEW PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING PARKING 512 STALLS PARKING RATIO 3.4/1000 SF PHASE 2 • DEMOLISH EXISTING MAJORS, 1, 2, 8 3 AND THE REMAINING PARKING AREAS IN FRONT OF THE MAJORS. • CONSTRUCT THREE NEW MAJOR BUILDINGS • NEW ENTRY ARCHES AT EXISTING MAJORS & SHOPS • REMODEL PARKING FIELD IN FRONT OF MAJORS 8 SHOPS K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 � PW MARKET/HOMESTEAD RETAIL - N CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETH RODRIGUES t VARTNERS �M� P H A I S NG PLAN o2.,o.,oNOR �--so._o. 1� 5 N O R T H W H I S Y A N p D. S U 1 T E / 2 0 0 0 80' 160' 240' YOUN7AI �� asa.,as.o�� P W M A R K E T .—. .�——— 0 SF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE 66,767 SF ' AREA � � �1 � -�� . �TTT - _ _ _ - • • ► ♦ �� i � � � r i i�r •�� • i�i i �• • ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � � I I I I I I I� I I I l PERCENTAGE 10.2 % . . a 98 F 86 SF � �•�;;:;;:;: � � I a 59 SF i 39 S 1,136 SF 2�015 SF 8 SF 8 SF 8 SF 8 F� � � < <:::::�: � � ; , ,; , � ---- ---� ---- .; : � :•: I I .. .. . •. .. .:.�:: ; B ... � . ,•:�. . . . . -- t;:::::'` SF ' 1 9 S •�.• I I __ • 60 SF �F ,, .. .. :. .. � � � �` e � � � • 2 • S ° SF I I •� 302 S -- -- �:;;. � 1 2S 1 2S � � ••1,040SF i 90SF � a__ __ __ 134 SF 207 SF �F a 78 S 78 S ' :•: : : •: : •: : . :•: . � : � 1 948 SF • 88 SF 1,081 SF • 207 SF 696 S 11� SF 138 SF 224 SF 1,646 SF 251 SF 1,646 SF 251 SF 2,676 F 650 S 115 SF i • : : : . . .. . . . ... :. � :: : : • .....; . .. :: : •:: :: . .. ... . . : : : SF SF �F � . :. ::: ; .... • :: . ................. � � I I 936•SF 186 S 2 1 F' a SF SF I I i 398 SF 398 SF 398 SF 911 SF 233 SF 233 SF I I SF SF �F ;;:; � 2 •: . � � � SF SF I I SF SF SF � � � ' 208 SF 749 � ' I I � SF SF �F � � .. .; . .... � � � � � a _ _ :�c� :: • ... • �O" 448 SF � ::: ' � . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �:•: :• •: : : : : :•: : : : :•: : : : •: :•: : : : : : : : : : : :• •: : . � : : . . �3,180 SF 167 SF 251 SF 251 SF 115 SF 251 SF 251 SF 251 SF i 115 S 481 SF 1,257 SF 174 87 • 67 SF • 174 SF i � i 202 SF 121 SF 121 SF i i ... .� •.� �;: � :;� � : � � � � � � � #_�___�_ � � '� ' • - - ___ - - --- --- • �-�-�F fi�-�-�_ - - �=�F ' 4 SF ►: .. - �_�_ � � � � _�_�_�� > ?1�=�=#-__ - _ �___�, _� • r�-� �__ � � � �� F==�==�+F= :_ � �� . � �� - - - - : �------�_===�------ � _===�-----� � �=a=a=� ��_ � , (; � � SF i i SF � i SF i :; SF ;� i i ,' i 9 SF 3 3 � ►� �:' � ►:: � I E ; � i;:; i � :•. ;•: , � , ..... ............................... . i i 2,076 SF i 10,082 SF ... ... ... K R P 1 2 3. 0 3 2 PW MARKET/HOME TEAD RET IL N S A � _____ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA KENNETH RODR16UE3 t PARTNE�S ,N� L A N D S C A P E A R E A C A L C U L A T I 0 N ♦� S N 0 R T X W N 1 S Y A N N D. S U I 7 E O 3. � 8. � O N 0 R T H / 2 0 0 �•-�•_�• 0 40' BO' 120' YOUNTAIN �� •��.,.5.��° P W M A R K E T ----- �� _ _ ; ,. ., ( ', � � \ 0 0 0 .� � — .f � i I NEW PAD 2 � � ` \ �Q� �. � � —�_—_____—' � N EW PAD 3 � , c - ----, ; I � �• � -R- T , � �! ' � � � �. � � ! ` ; __ _ -- - � I �� I�;I � � i �� I tI �� I � I I � � � `_. , e — J � 1 � J �— I I � l � � � __ _. , NEW PAD 4 � ' I 1 � �____ .__ — i � � , � , , ; � IJ � � � ' i � � % �'----- - ---_ __.__.____ �'� � � � e �� - ' j _ W � , / 1 , e � !� ' I � I� � ^-�-- � ' � ' �� I 1 � ; � �_ NEW PAD 1 I '� � � t � + � j ,� , FF 210.3_ � --- --- —�— --- � � � � � � � ��\ � i � � '� � �` � —, � _—) _� � , � ' � i I �.,.,._ . .�� C ) C� � � _ C � ._ � � � � � � I ! � � � � � �, ! i � � . �� _ _ BUBBLER � ^�� t - � � � I' _—� (--_� r —_� � ` � I �,� f -- ' � � �- � �, L—J � I �• -�--�— --�--- ....-...�- � - , , I � , � —� I , t . � 1 -......� -...� —....� r-..._ � . � i � , ..`. , , "_ .. . .. � . �. .. � I I . . . ,... .+ . I I . � `... _J ... � ' � �. ' .'.�i..f . � ' r � ; � ,� � ( � , �;:: j :..�� _ _. . � I ! � � . �� °C � °� � � � w ; � ��, � �, � ; � .� � - .--� �' ., ; � �. , , , � �� ` � �� o � � � , � ' � W � - � ' , , °� � � � � d � � II � � . ''� ; � ; N �� ' � � � ,.�-,- � � � � � � �' � � � , � , � � -._._._ _ ; � � ,, � � � � W � � � � 1 �_ � � w � � _ � •� � � > i � �' � � A ! � S�MH I � � � � � � r i x �� l i � � � �,...� L ' °� �1 __ _ � ; H \ �--=. -`�" J l �, � �-----. � � - � ._-_ � - - - - - - - - - - o— 0 � � .� O � � � � � . � C� �� — -.'„� """� "^ � -�^-�► -�^-+- ' PUMP STATiON A 4 ! � � � _� �� `]' � � r '__� � J _„�,.� _,.,�.r . Z � �WITH 2 PUMPS � � _,,,,� � ( ( � � � S ( � � � .J� , ` � � " � , / �— "_� � , � �./�/ ,�' �' � -'�' � / ^/`R ' R ' ` ��F� �� --�_� —R R � _.___ 1�.��___._� � � � � 0 0 0 0 � � o 0 o a o c / � � � � � `� � -.....� -.....� �..,...► � � � ' � � � 1 � � � � �,� � EX. MqJOR S EX. M/�OR 4 NEW MqJOR 3 NEW MqJOR 2 NEW MP�OR 1 --�— �--- �- � �, �� , � �-- —R— —R—\ R— `� y , r �, � � � � �� y � W � � �' L ' 1 � ` � I � I I , � � �.� � � � �' �� /� � I �, � _ > � � ) `�� 0 40 80 120 � � � � � v � � � I � � � � � � � Scale 1" = 40 ft I � -....r . r....� . -.�,..� . _,.,..� �-'� ,.�\ _.._ ._ �� \ ; _----=-=-- �- � �� ..,--� � , , -_ _ _ _ __--- �R�_ � �I 1 � � � -......� _.,._� • • - � � � '�"� -�^-� -��---� . � � r' � -. -�; ' r — -�-- - ._..... ...._.__ ..__. _ ---..._.. ... _ _____ . ... __-------.—__.___.__. _... ._... -- --- - - - - — � __ __ __ " __ __ __ -_ __ " " __ '_ __ __ _. __ " _' � __ __ __ _' '• -- \-�-------- � � � ' � � A70008 � PW MARKET/ H4MESTEAD RETAIL --- - N W KIER & WRIGHT NENMETMRODRIGUES 6 PARTNERS �� CD N C E PTUAL G RAD I N G P LAN CIVIL ENGINEERS& SURVEYORS INC. � � ■ 2-23-14 N 0 R T H 3350 Scott Boulevud. Building 22 (408) 727 6665 ��s NORTH WMISM�N RO. SUITE�Y00 San[aCtara,UUfom1a95054 fax(408)72756a1 MOUNTAINVIEW CA E30.9E5 0700 CUPERTINO, C A L I F O R N I A ------------- ---- -- USER: svelasquez I: �PROJECTS�A10008\OWG�PLANNING�C1.0 GRAD.dwg MARCH 01, 2010 2: 12 PM , , ,,, j ; _ � 3 Mf5 UI�iT 3 o BY PASS PIPE � ' . , `, �`� ',, ' ' ' NEW PAD 3 !��o � NEW PAD 2 i, � x o �,-�-------- � � � . , __ , o i � . . i I ` � Q ,+ _ � , , f � � � �� , � i �� . : �i �-� ' i � � � � I � � � "� I �. _ _ _ _ f� I �� NEW PAD 4 i >� ! ___ � E - - - _ -- - _ . . i I ,_ � N ; � a/L � .. . � ; i ... ....,_ .......__...__...._.... : ( o.c�r... � � i ; �;+ _ v � I ; , � � , ; -� , , � � x ---------__ __----- ___ ____ ' � - � C3. �. ' ' � � ..�k , � � . � * �;it; ; , � � AI��A 3 _ � � � `�� NEW PAD 1 { � �� , � � � i �_ i� � � ! � /� I * ,� FF 210.3 ± � � , � -- --- --- ' i i !'� j i x � , — - - _ — __ _- ..., . % - --�� ` - � � . . - C i �(, E ___. � I ��.l. ��.` I .. � , I .,, . _ I ._ . ' .�� , �. , \1 ----- ��---------- � .. { '' f �!� ..= ��.. � � . • .. � f �� i :.. I .yT� r t..� �.. . I� _ Af�� 1 . . � ; - � � � � E = .� � � � w � + x � T'�-�i � 4 O O H ( BUBBLER � j j � --- � � i , �r � . _. . -. . . ------- ---------^----- ,� , , ,- ; , � I I � 1 i , , � , . , ; . -----� - -- � - _._. ___. _ ___ __- ---- � . , , , i �d, (_ _ , � I I I - ' , � � � � , , � I � ,# __ ` I � . : x ! .. .... . ._ � i ; , _ _ � � � , � , _� _ � `'' Q , i � I � i � �� ' I W , i I r ( � ' i - -. .- - ' - , � ; i 2 Z �, ,�,i ' , i . � _ I Q � `� � C3. F �� I W � I � i 1 � �i � I { 1 �W � � i ; � ,. � ' N i I I��a i' , ;, . �, z , � i + �� ¢ - I ; ' j � � I >^ � _ . _ �E i ` .� I. � � , ' A � � i -X � � ' . ; '�� __ ; � i �� — -• , , , '�. ; � � i ^.i" : . � � �� ...... ... .... _..._._ ..... .... - � � � � � � � ` I --_ __ .. � �. . .., ..... .�-.-.-�" , I --' '- "' . SDMH ; � . - - �� i ��. , .. 1 .. __...�._. .� '.:t. � ..:.. ..r- -- '�fi - . . r •, , . ( .,, �% ' 0 ; I , I � ' � ; , , - ' , . , .,- . , � . . � �. � ' . '� . . �. z , . �. . . , , ... � `�.. . . i ,.�. i �.. i � ,. � ; � ��: . . I _ . . , t '.._ —� ��. PUMP STA710N A � `—� L ' — � I WITH 2 PUMPS � , _ , , _ , _-- — -.-._ _.. _ — - __ a.._._...�._. ....._. ... _...___.... .......___ _....,� __.. __..._ -- - - - - _. I � I . ,- ; , � - - —. � � ,- ., ; ' ! , ( � r � ....� � - .., . .. ��.- . „ ��.�_ �. .- , � . . . .. , ... _ - � `� _ ,, � � �� r ❑ �. ; c � c ' .t .. .'I � � - - - �� ` - u� `� . — , _ _ , ,._, ...� . _ �- L � , � , - _ - �1 _ , __ �� ,.. �--� � � �� ;- . _ :_ � � � � _-� �.� � � � � . � , � f ; �'' ,>i � } ( � \ I 1 - � I � 3 1 � � f i � , � � ' ,}� ' ! i � �j � i �'� I , � EX. MAJOR S EX. MqJOR 4 NEW MqJOR 3 NEW MqJOR 2 NEW M�OR 1 6; ! ' � � '� f j � AREA 2 ��' ; � ''�, v �. � ' � � S'� � � ' k � � ; ' " w t � � � ! �� 6 6 2 AC ' � � � � � ; i • . N �, ; ; ss r� E .� I , t , �� B PA - P I Y - -� � � i !. � � _ } � _ i � �� `T_ _—� 0 40 80 . i�_, o o � ', �`-� � �" •� 3 Mf5 UNIT 2 �� , Scale i"= 40 k I ; ; i 1 _ g- , - i . � , � - _ " __ _ _ _ � � _ ; ; ( . .. _v 1 - a� -- - � � � - - . .: - , : ------ ------- -------------- i __ _ _. . � '� I � ___ �. --. �. — — _. , ,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . �-T ., . ' ; _ _ : � _ .._. _ __ ;.____ ._ _ _ _ ; _ _ _. _ ..-.. _ _ . --� _ ----- --- , �.,:� �, _ � _ _,- _ __ _ _ _ , - - _,-_ :f _ _ - _ _:._ -- -- = =�.�- ' � __ . -�-�-� -�-�-f -��-� �-�-E ■ �-�- �-�-� _ -�=�-f f-�-E f-�-E __ �-�- " _ - - �- - - — - — - �-- -. - - _ ! t --_ _— - - - --- - -- --_ _ A70008 PW MARKET/ HOMESTEAD RETAIL -- ------ -- --- - N 1 _ . � W KIER & WRIGHT KEMNfTNFODRt6�ES�iARTNERS STpRMWATER MANA�EMENT ��- ��-��- - �-- � � CML E NEERS & SURVEYORS, INC. � 2-23to « o a T r+ 3350 Scott Boule�vrd. Butlding 7t (401p )2) t+fi55 ------- ---.. ..__-... ��s tioaTH wn�sr*w Rn S.LAYE�200 SanaClua.CaWorNa95054 fax(10�72)5641 MOL717A1N YI£MY C11 f 3 D.965 0790 PLAN CUPERTINO, C A L i F O R N I A : - ��:s�i�a�.�z c��ao,�c?s�ni�oo��tawc�,a+�r�na�r�c2.a sr�.a.ny MAROi 03. 20Sfl 2_ae � ~1Q � 2.25' 10.00' 2.25' 3.00' Q(Stormwater Treatment) _.80 x 0.2 x 6.62 = 1.06 cfs Area 1 will be treated by 2 vegetated swales. Vegetated swale A has the capaciry to treat 2.31 Ac. Vegetated swale B has the capacity to treat 1.69 Ac. The combined capacity of these 2 swales will treat 4.00 Ac. Area 1 Is The MFS Unit (Unit 2) will be sized to treat a flowrate of 1.06 cfs. Fiowrates in excess of the stormwater 4.00 Ac. and therefore will be adequately treated by the 2 swales. treatme�t flowrate will be conveyed by a bypass pipe around the MFS Unit and will be discharged to the public I 3: �� ,_��,_ �,_, �_��, storm drain system. 7 A pump station wi[h 2 pumps will be constructed on the existing storm drainpipe draining Area i. One pump '- Q1 _i;,- Area 3 wfll be designed to discharge 0.37 cfs which is the stormwater treatment flowrate 9enerated by 2.31 Ac. This --, �„_ discharge will be directed to and treated by Swale A. The remaining pump will be designed to discharge 0.27 cfs � I I= Area 3 will be treated by a MFS Unit (Media Filtration Unit). Area 3 is 5.19 Ac. The Stormwater Treatment Q is: which is the stormwater treatment flowrate generated by 1.69 Ac. This discharge will be directed to and treated I I � ; 1 by Swale B. I jl il Q(Stormwater Treatment) _.80 x 0.2 x 5.19 = 0.83 cfs The treated stormwater, along with flowrates exceeding the stormwater treatment Flawrate, wlll be collected in a I 1- -_ ,-,_ ��= i �_ i i I-I I =1I i i t-i i i= �--�---� The MFS Unit (Unit 3) wlll be sized ta treat a flowrate of 0.83 cfs. Flowrates in excess of the smrmwater dedicated storm drainpipe and conveyed to a proposed junction box adjacent to Homestead Road for discharge o T I treatment flowrate will be conveyed by a bypass pipe around the MFS Unit and will be discharged to the public to the public storm drain. °• -1 I- storm drain system. The swale calculations are as follows: -- -- r "'-"'-"-" ' CALTRANS PERMEABLE MATERIAL - - 6' PERf. PIPE 2/19/10 2.00' --�- --- - A10008 VEGETATED SWALE CALCULATIONS Flow-Based Stormwater Treatment BMP � � � VEG ETATED SWALE A �� STORMFILTER DESIGN TABLE - �,,.,.m'� (StormKefer Treafinent i= 0.20 in/hr) � �--�ow�M- StormFilter' • THE B' z 16' S70RMFILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY VARIES BV NUMBER OF FIITER CAF2TRIDGES INSTALLEO AND BV REGIpN For C= 0.80 I= �.20 iNhr, and Area = 100,733 sf 2.313 F�C. SPECIFiC INiERNAL FLOW CONTROLS CONVEYANCE CAPACIN IS I3ATED AT 1.8 CFS. . • THE STANDARO CONFIGURATION IS SHONRJ. ACTUAL CONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIFIED STRUCTURE(5) PER CIVI� ENGiNEER The Stormwater treatment Q= 0.37 cfs or 166 CJP/Il WILL BE SHOWN ON SUBMITTAL DRP,WING�SI. � - � . � • AL'. PARTS PROVI�ED AND INTERNAL ASSEMBLV BY CANTECH STORMWAiER SOLUTiONS UNLE55 OTHERVJISE NOTED. � .. . . . .. . CAR�RiDGE HEIGHT 2T 18' 1Y Channe� deg9n: ' � SYSTEM iYDR4ULIC DROP H- REO'D. MIN. 3.05' 2.3' 1.8' Botrom slope, s s= 0.0125 ft.�ft. �REA?AENL dV MtUTA SUHFACE AREA ap B � Z BDmm� � 9��p' '_' ___-'__-__. . ..__-_ _' . -. .- ...-- --- ... c:A�1 71.5 11,25 15 7.5 10 5 Manning's n n=' 0.2500 C�.250 recommended ---- 1-- - _ - Side sl Ri ht side 3.00 horiz. to 1 �ert. s 1 max --- �� 9 --- - - Side slope, Left side 3.00 horiz. to 1 �ft. 3 1 R13)( INSPECTIONAND _- - - - - � A _ Depth of flow. d d= 0.17 ft. (treatment depth) 3'+ ' fl m�x ,sEE FFtnuE nrao Bottom width, w W= 10.00 R. ii .i• COVERDETPJL) - 16' Top width @ Q T ,., i ,,,.,,� depth 11.0 ft. _ Top width @ design depth 14.5 ft. Design depth = 0.75 ft. r .,� - _,---.---�rr,--,._ c � ��.�, � There/ore: , _' � 1' �_ w; i`- 1 w;�`�•�t�` I. � � , . , ' _ _ � � � � � � � �� H �� _--- Area A= 1.83 sq. ft. _ I_ A i�� 4,y �' -� �`-� �-;�--V�ie,4� �� A . ..-- . 7�`_4 � < � `< � `! �" `c � < g• Wetted erimeter Pw = 11.10 ft. _ - ._. ___ __ _ --- � ` r P 'r�. ! �`"'`� Z-! !- _ . Hydraulic redius r = 0.16 � ,, ,� �` -'�-� i, �- J �` ;f `f �;, � _ ' Ftow , � � �¢ � ` --�-"-; ;--`�- +�- --� --+�-y--^,--`�� `� � � , , „ iow , ., . � = � ` -+.` � .:i-�<_r-+�_ = By Mannln9's Eauadon: _, : _ _ , _ � .. ,E----4-----�- ��- �� - - - 1 1 ' - � _y_�'_y_"„ _ .. . . �.. _ .. _ .. . INLET PIPE � =�/" �i ��i �� @ � _,' -` . � � OL'TLET PIPE � G_ L_ L �l-.. �al � / / . .. ___'.._ ; �. _�__"� _�_ -� � I l �'-,4-'°'--A--'°'--fi--�-��-�'-�-'- �k'�i%;� Q= 0.37 cis 0 37 cfs requ�red Swale Length: 120 ft. � , . , . . . , . . ., , , . '�, � i �._,: .,-' •'-' •-_' _-' . �� _' V = 0.20 ips '' --- --�-------------� v ---------�__ 1� Residence time in swale: 10.0 minutes _ ______ Fi�rwnoNSnv ALTERNA7E PIPE � LOGTION (TYP OF 4) Construct 1 swale(s) 14.5 ft. wide x 120 ft. long , PLAN (ACCESS FRM1E AND COVERS � 5.50� OMITTED FOR CLARITVI '. �. . 2/�9/�Q FRAMEANDCOVER A10008 2.25' 8.50' 2.25' 2.50 IT'POF2) � GRA�E RING _'_�___ _ (tYP OF 7) VEGETATED SWALE CALCULATIONS � ov�aF�ow Elow-Based Stormwater Treatment BMP - - - .,• �. ; . _ . , . ;,,...., .. , _ . �-.. Swale B i- 3. � � =i � �--_ --� � �- srev . . __. _ _. _ _ . _ . - _ _.. . ._... _. ___ i � _I � ENERGV (Stormwater Treatment i= 0.20 in/hr) -- - _ i�- �issianroF - -- -= �-- _ .___ �� _.___.. � . - . .' � . . � . ' . ,. . . _ - 5 3 MIN For C= 0.80 i= 0.20 iNhr, and Area = 73,600 sf 1.690 Ac. _ � �� ; j ��; : - - - - , ` � `�� I �. %�� % � ; � � The Stormwater beaUnent Q= 0.27 cls or 121 gpm I I �H ', 9�� ;a �� I ' � - . I_ - Channel desgn: __ � �_ _ ---� - I- . _ _ _ '� � ; �.: . . o I I_ _ • , : . .. . , .. �=--� � -i^ I I I = I I i i- �. i-� .-. . �_._.�. ._ L... . - --- ------ ...--- -. --. . . �. Bottom slope, s s= 0.0130 k.lft. t o sroae+Fi�Te�z _- , \ (;AH�IiIUGE -� � HFC UNDERORAIN pUTLET Manning's n n= 0.2500 0.250 recommended . _ e�aniiFO_o sun�r - --- --- --- - - - Side slo Ri hl side 3.00 horiz. l0 1�.ert. �3:1 max � Pe� 9 _ _ --- I 1-11-11 LI 1„ I_ _ Side slope. Left side 3.00 horiz. to 1 eert. 3 1 max =-- CALTRANS PERMEABLE MATERIAL SECTION A- A _. __ _ ,_ _ Botto wid h. w w= 8.50 �(treatment depth) j. �F� «,.�, __.___ 2.00' 6' PERF. PIPE Top width @ Q r,,,, depth 9.4 ft. . Top width @ design depth 13.0 ft. Design depth = 0.75 ft. ' - Therefore: _ Area A = 1.42 sq. ft. + -.._ ._ ._.._ .-- :, Wetted penmeter Pw = 9.50 ft. - - VEGETATED SWALE B 2 MFS (MEDIA FILTRATION UNIT) DETAIL 3 -- �� -- Hydraulicredius r= 0.15 _- ----- - ! ' _ _ ___. By Manning's EquaUon: � � - -� -- -- . �= 0.27 cfs 0,27 cfs required Swale Length: 115 ft. V = 0.19 ips Residence time in swale: 10.0 minutes Construct 1 swale�s) 13.0 ft. wide x 115 ft. long A10008 � PW MARKET/ HOMESTEAD RETAIL - N k W KIER & WRIGHT KENNETH RODRIGUES 6 PARTNERS INC S T O R M WAT E R T R EAT M E N T CIVIL EN I SURVEYOR , �N . � z-2s-�o N o R T H 3350 Scott 8oulevard, Bullding 22 (408) 727 6665 It5 NORTM WHISMAN RD. SUITE�200 SanUClara,Califomia95054 fax(108)7275641 MOUNTAINVIEW CA fi50 865.0700 NOTES&DETAILS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ____ _ ____ ___ _ USER: svelasquez I: \PROJECTS\A10008\DWG\PLANNING\C3.0 STRM DETL.dwg MARCH 01, 2010 2:12 PM TR ES�CH EXISTING SHADE TREES SUCH AS: LONDON STAR ETC)�-NILE. SMA�LL-SCALE ORNAMENTAL ACCENT TREES (SUCH AS: WTHORNE OSEMARY ONIB�INDIAR MEDI�UM S ZE SHRUB II �� I LOW SHRUB BORDER `� ' �� '' '` (I.E. LONDON P�ANE PROPOSED LARGE-SCALE CANOPY , DWAR ABELIA ETC.) � BETWEEN ENTRY TREES � LARGE-SCALE FALL CHANTICLEER FLOWERING PEAR, CRAPE MYRTLE, PLANE TREE AND EUROPEAN \ COLOR ACCENT BUFFER (TYP.) / 1 HACKBERRY) � FLOWERING LOCUST, PURPLELEAF PLUM ) PUBLIC ART AREA AND PROJECT SIGNAGE EXlSTING LANDSCAPE \ RE EWAYS SUCH AS: POSSIBLE LAWN BIOSWALE �N�TH F�OWERING PERENNiALS AND SEASONAL TO REMAIN (TYPICAL) PARKING AREA \ \ �''� / I �ISLE �,� MEDIAN W/ FLOWERING � RED SUNSET DRAINAGE AR�AS (SEE SECTION) COLOR (TYP.) � - +I PERENNIAL COLOR A _� ,. MAPLES) t ., - , . ! �<. ;. ;,, ,,,. ._ . _ _ ' .; ,,;, r� : : : . _ ; .. , � ' ` •.: ; ;, �' �;.: . ,% ' • . �;.tt • • .u��n,}�.�:: - � � ' .. ' � �.. K '�,+. - ` . . . n � � ..�.:�� • -...; � , F.i C r ,7'�-f. _ 1�. ' .: : � . . . , .> ,., .. g , ', �., .ti i - � - �. z :� ^ s . � . �%'� . � ,�� . '�'�� - - �. , � ' .. �: ��'r '��• .. .4 - '_�;� �: _ . . �. . . . �� '�'�'�F' �., . s.�i'-� „y e 3 � ...�j '°�• - � � o • � � � �� r � =L F �-��--.�..:: .�:- . � � � � . , , k • � i � . . . � � 1 � . . . ' � � . �� , . � �� • �. 1 O . . . � _ ' . � �... . . . . , � _ AT MAIN EN RY DRIVE .. 'f.Y�'N �. .: � . ... . � ��:.- � y �f4 . . �,...' : r ,�� ..�•.t'.. .,Y ��„ ,� � ..� ` � �•r... a . � . •? �.. �. . . � ..... - .� �nv . : _ ' �, � T : �..�. � � . � . . . .- .. .....,.r �r_.�. .. .+e. �Kikt.�-� .3...,n.....,-:' }-. :;,t.. !. ':'..�.. ��..._.. � e �.C. .. _ Y Y� 1� ... � 3/16 .S:y. ..1� �-7 .S?.'/!K�M!' �n�JPl+.<. .Y. . . S� . j�.T.�� .:4• �[ W . ' �S�' .. . . . . ' • . ' l y� . :..., .. ..�..� .. - :.. r ..c.:...%:: .. .♦ � . . 'y:.n.�. .-.r� �. r ........E . . \ 1rt' ' ; . -.. .; .� ..,..-.: i �� '-.:: .�'.' .,�" .. ,- �:... ..... .... .� .. . . .. ... ... ... . . . . � ., . . . . . . :.... ...�. . . ...: - t... .w7� ., ... ,.. ...,, .j. .. . ._. ., . ...�. , . �... ..�. .. - - . . �. ... : . .�. ., a,_ • t:� "a.,. S. d..... . �.. �._�. -_� :•...� .'... .: �'�� . ,::. .. . �.%' '1+ r.ti.�x.�.k . . , " v � t. . _. .x z4. • ��. . � � . $.e ... <•, •' . • . t �A., , :. . ,� .... ... . ......�.. ..:i''Fx: ... . ... . .. . .. . .. .�.,.�...� .�. .,�. �,. . ...,.. �..�..�: , .;.... ,: : .. ,...... -.. . _.:: -. ,. —� � . . .....: . .; � . •.!.;� � . .. ` „' ,., as ., .. '��". _. . SrT. � v . � ._.,.'r -� /--- NEW (21) CFMNESE , . . ,,..... , . : , : � - �r � � � � �+y • i� . �ti`�Zr'i'Y7 � P�.ST -. �� S .w {^:' , 1 . � ;.:-�_ ,;C,l� i, �� ; 'ro .:"�.S�s..� U�� , ..y.. '��• :.. . ACHE �"` >. � �� _ , ,. PRELIMI P E T s.. � �:� ..;�w :..,��,:-. . ,.. .,. ,�,.�� NARY LAND APE AL T E _. ... . _ . , . ,. , :�. ,. ,,,,:,,.. _.... :. _., . ,, : �.,,: ,,< .,. .� , _ , . . r. , , .-s� �, .�{„ _,..: � z,... :;a ;. .� . . . NEW (22) RED SUNSET .... ,. , (21) RW SUNSET . .. .__ . .. . .� .. .. , , ,... . .,�. • 4TY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SZZE .,, ., � ,... ., < i M ,.�,, MAPLES ,r . • -- _ .,. . ,. � APLES „ - .�. , �. . .^, . , „ _ ,..t w :.r. ' : :�. .• � . � . -�a • , . � , .. ,� , . . .. .. , . . . . . . ... . . . ., . .. . ..... . - - . . ...:. . . . ...... . ..... ... .. . ..... .. ... N, , ... ..... . : . .: < , ... .... . . . . ..... .... .... . . � r • _ ... ... .... .... . .... , � R .. ; •_'�. ;• •!' } ,.� � . T R E E S: ; � � , , � � � � � . � � . .. . �.' �r ... .. .. . .. ..... . • . . , ' • .:.::• .. . ...... . ::.:.. .. :.. .....•.�...•..• . �. ... ;..,.,. • . ..••. ,...� --- — -- +y � ONSET . .... ,. ✓ ........ .... .. . :... •.:::::::.. , .. ,... ...:• ..::.. .. . . � '� , ... . . . , 48 ACER RUBRUl1 'REDS RED S SE r ........... ..... ....... . ....... . . . . . . .. .. .; ., ., ........ . -- ----.. _ _ _ . _ UN T MAPLE 24" BOX ..... ... . . . . ... ............ .. . ..:.:.:.: :.. .... •. � ..... .. ......... . ........ ... ....... .. ...:. . ........ . ;.; . . .. ...... . ...:. . , ......................................... . . .. ..........:.�.:.:.: '..:...: ....... ... L ... . . ....�.�.. �.�.�...� . . ....... . .............. .... .. . . . , .. �- ..� �.�.� •. . .......................•................ . ":. i .. ...- ...............,....., ........... ' ."________. .� ..._ " . .Y � � � ... .... 1 CELT S A ` . � ' ' ; ! , i I �'� „ •• �'• � � � � � � � . � y � .•,� , � 40 LAGERSTROEMIA HYSRID CRAPE 75 GALLON .. .... •. �: ' f • NEW (6) CHAN ' _ _ - - " 0 P NUS CAN � " " NEW(3)FL WERINGIOCUST � �::•.: �• :�: I I � �� : � -� \` :.� � 1 Z ARIENSIS CANARY ISLAND PINE 24" BOX � ' '?<',• °' R a ; ,� � 27 PISTACIA CAINENSIS CHINESE PISTACHE 24" BOX . - ` i. = NEW (10) PURPLELEAF PWMS � :•; ;, FLOWER PEAR ?', � -- � . � � � ' �` "�-d 30 PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA LONDON PLANE TREE 15 GALLON � �� pA � -.. . --f=�� EX.LONDONPIANE 22 PRUNUS CERASIFERA 'THUNDERCLOUD' PURPLE LEAF PLUM 75 6ALLON ,%,�—� N€W PAD 3 ° � ° ' � �` n�� '� `� � r ' r � 1 I - -- - --_� �,.i. � � " 93 PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CHANTICLEER' CHANTICLEER FLOWERING PEAR 15 GALLON > • ■ � �'•; a• ; > �' � � ?�' � `' 16 ROBINIA 'PURPLE ROBE' FLOWERING LOCUST 15 GALLON ,;, S s . -- -- ,, . - .- '>� y �;: � 4 SYAGRUS ROMAN20FFIANUM QUEEN PALM SPECIMEN j I I I,� � ` t: JFt� S H R U B 5 , P E R E N N I A L S A N D O R N A M E N T A L G R A S S E S � -- NEW (12) �CAA Mv rie • r'� SEAS,(� L SHADE C(�L.�JEi. � �, . ' f�'��,��`'� ABELIA 'EDWARD GOUCHER' DWARF ABELIA 5 GALLON :'� i .- . . NEVH (16) . � . ' . . ; . -- � - ' . ,. '= . EXISTING ;>'; :.; ;� ALYOGYNE HUEGELII BLUE AIBISCUS 5 GALLON I :- . • , . � a_ LONOON .�6:� : �,.— A � ! i� -: � �: � BUDDLEJA DAVIDII BDTTERFLY BUSH 5 GAI.LON a.�r� NEW t) L U �.. • .. , , RETAIL ; ' _. , � .�, � � � � N�IN PAD 1 EX. � ��t CALAMAGROSTIS X A(.YITIFOLIA FEATHER REHD GRASS 1 GALLON CISTUS DORIS RIBBERSON' PZNR ROCKROSE 5 GALLON I! � i - i BOTTLEBRUSH �� -.(-- � �� `:.,� DIETES BICOLOR AFRICAN ZRZS 5 GALLON ,� � ', NEW (� FCOW�RM�Q LOG'U5T. j ; � �'�� ' ' i �''""' ESCALLONIA 'TERRI' DidARF ESCALLONIA 5 G7�LLON NEW (2) FLOWERING b p � I g��gEppy� �- � i � �� HELICPOTRICdON SBMPERVIRENS BLUE OAT GRASS 1 GALLON LOCUST + �� __ _ � '�y; :�fi HEMEROCALLIS ITYBRIDS DAYLILY 5 GALLON EX. LONDON -- `-- �- �� ; J LAV7SNDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA ENGLISH LAVENDER 5 GALLON !PIAN� �. � i i i ' - 4 - '— y� '. LAVATERA THURINGIACA 'BARNSLEY' TREE MALLOW S GALLON w. +v ,,. x ":. ... . ... : . � _ ..� , � —, ,. :, ,. ' � — --- . •. .. � ....•, ' � ' .. NEW(3 � `� ,. o ;^' NANDINA DOMESTICA AEAVENLY BAMBOO 5 GALLON - �: I � L T -_- — -_ NEW (10) CANAfiY t9lANp�pINE NEW (7) FURPLELEAF PLUf.� BRUM RASS i PENNISETOM SETACEUM 'RU PURPLE FOUNTAIN G 5 GALLON i i�� _ _ � �� PENSTEMON GLOXZNZOIDES GARDEN PENSTEMON 5 GALLON � � ''� PLpMBAGO CAPENSIS CAPE 5 GALLON EXISTING ' ___ "" RAAPAIOLEPIS INDSCA INDIA HAWTHORNE 5 GALLON PAD NEVJ (72) _ APE MYRTLE � � ROSA 'MEIDILAND' CARPET ROSES S GALLON r's ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ROSEMARY 5 GALLON � �. NEW (5) LONDON pI.ANE 1 � . : :_, • EX. EUCS. � �� -• G R O U N D C O V E R S A N D F L O W E R I N G C O L O R ■ ■ NEW (8) CRAP RT I I ' ---` EX.LONDON � o AGAPANTHUS 'PETER PAN' (DWARF LILY-OF-THE-NILE) FROM 1 GALLON @ 24" O.C, PLANE - � � � .� s � � FLOf�IERING SEASONAL COLOR FROM 4" POTS @ 8" O.C, (!lIN. 9 VARIEI'IES) •jL -J � � ��' LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS (LAVENDER LANTANA) FROM 1 GALLON @ 36" O.C. NEW (5) PURPIEIEAF NEW (1D EUROPEAN Q° � NEPETA FAASSENZI (CATMINT) FROM 1 GALLON @ 24" O.C. SCAEVOLA lfAWE CLUSTERS' (FANFLOWER) FROM 7 GALLON @ 29" O.C. ( �-�� - NEW (14) CWWTLICLEER ' NEW (13)CHAN7ICLEER � SOD LAF/N ('MEDAILLON' DWARF FESCUE BY "PACIFIC SOD" OR APPROVED EQUAL - HACKBERRY FLOWERING PEAR NEW (6) EUROPEAN NACKBEHAY � FLOWEPoNG PEAR �� EX. LONDON PLANE TRACHELOSPERFIUM JASMINIOIDES ( STAR JASMINE) FROM 1 GALLON @ 24" O. C. r'.a '� � i �� i I � ' I�� II i I ; RED SUNSET �. 3 � � t � � , ( ' f I i ' I I . � �� ' jr 1� 1� c3i' _ � - = i I' _ ;� ' � �� . i _ c _�_�_ - _ - L'- MAPLES � � �l :c +� ; ' .� � �; .�.. � #, '�_# tF_{ , -��__�,� � _ � � .�,_ , : � � ; - _ _ _ �r � , � ; r_`� t _,�_� I T _i__� _ � f ___.' ___"_'_— _.—� _—_____ _� . ____'_�.._____' _'_—_..___� ' l. _ . � . . � �� '� � - ��- � � �� ., T _�� -- 1 I � DECORATIVE ' CONC1 PLAZAS, ENTRY DRIVE ACCENT PAVING I , � N�w ta� ouEa ' � ' � � , . _ - — - --- -- � � PALMS ` . � ' � ; �& CROSSWALKS W/ INTEGRAL COLOR & SCORING PATTERN j ! � � � V 1 f' � . � EXISTING � ; ' ; I (TYPICAL) , , � � � EXISTIN(�i i " � , '� - I �' SHOPS ' � � i I I � i. � � 3. � � -� t �� , i Ex. M�M��B 1 � EXISTING I; EXISTING � � NEW � NEW � � NEW I_ ; � RETAi� � "., �• , ., � JACARANOA `� , � � � - ,-'� - i MAJOR 5 MAJOR 4 ! MAJOR 3 � MAJQR 2 � MAJOR 1 '� `\ I ; ! i _ ' ,�� PROPOSED STREET TREE , � � t ' (REFER TO PLAN) � � i ; i _. , � ; i ' � I ; _ �- «„ `� .� � � \ ,� ' 1 VEGETATIVE BIOSWALE WITH �\` � � EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN � � ' � �'� ,� \�\ ' � I(PREDOMINANTLY SYCAMORES, LIQUIDAMBAR, ! j � i, ', ORNAMENTAL GRASSES, PERVIOUS . � EX. CAMPHOR TREES ' � EUCALYPTUS & IVY GROUND COVER ! ;.� , i SOIL MIX AND PERFORATED PIPE - ' TO STORM IN EX LONDON PUNE - � � `'� \� �� \ � - — ---- ' � � , , , I _.___ _ _ - --- ------- �— - - - - --- - - --,_,�-�:i ----- ---- � __ _ � , __. .. , , _. . . _ , , i — i , _ . __ . , , , , , � _. .... � - - i ; � i I z3, � � \ �'—__ _- _•'� � I I I`= II . . � r . ___—'_ 'C I � — w�� - n. A �_J � . f• . �� . L AWN PAR WA U K Y . . °F .. ,. . ......._ .. ._ ._ - - _ �;� , . _ . . , . : '_ . ... .. . 1` yP:' _ .i.�.. .. : � � n . .. . . . . . -�. ' � :. "^-' Il l l i l I ( . ... . . ..�� . .�.- . . .. v: e : - _l r , . ,, ., . ..: - • �, . .. . . � � � tT � NEW CITY � 1�:; �= � _ . ; . . .�� -. . �" �r'`'� �%�!Y �� 1: : : - , SIDEW �.. Sr- ..: ..-. .:. . , : ., .. '.. � �' . . . - Y � d'� . �a.,1S� .. �'� '-'- � :': '�' �t. K++� -?G � � ,� ; PARKIN REA HOMESTEAD ROAD . 4 ,.. . .. . , . . . ^ . '� t ., r,. .i¢ _ ALK Y N .� � ' -� G A �...:.:��:�« � �.. - .. � t ,. < ,...�,�,. ,s ; ," s r � rxc;�f�`i�"�'• `""'��'�. �4 ..�ti ' ' �: , � i ,� � - ,:a.. �i'#i ' �� . . � - �..d. r . ��.��' r.fr . -:};� : y' ..,.'S��'" . . � !l, L i � , . . �.... . . �, ^ . - i,' . !.,1:�' s r. . . �s� �' � � �l! � � � � � � '� � -�Y'. --`.r.+..�- .. , .'6 ��,N .. . �-' r � , �' � Y = _ Y,. 1r""' . . � 3;.aPt`�: . ��t . .. . . .. ... .. . . . . ..... . . .. " t.�,'� �50... `, �;//f�J§\ � / , +x . - . � '�� t: � . o' , . . Y +: �� ..� �� . � . ��1:,. 'i i 2 ^ ... . ' � 1, f '+� � . ,: � a � / �� .. . 'J' _ � .,� P': i � b . :� y . �+,r. � � . r' . . �t: -� . - F�: . . .. � � : 1 9r ,��w,. . W. ' �'}:- . a ,.. ' " =. . ±: . � � .'y.d.��. � . ...:. .. . '�t'� � � . �� ... s _.. ' � ° !��L..., ... .__ � _ " M _"_« _.. . . ".^�{ �� . . ._... � � �`_':>'' ,._ . ':`tn��' �� '� �� . . • U ,; �� .' .� : . . .;. . .. : �.. . . . t � 1 �._ ' __ _ ... _ .' ._ __ �_"'u _ '. �. L° �,q A I 8 •8S o . SECTION AT BIOSWALE AND STREETSCAPE 1i4�� = r-o�� P W M A R K E T H M ____ KRP 12 N 3.032 �� / 0 ES TEA D R� T - - , AIL � � _ ____-__ __ ___ _ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA - - - ' � I 03, 08. 1 0 , / 1�------- 0 2. 2 2 __ 1 - O ■ LAI.DERBAUGH - -- _ o z . ,. o . .. �. . o., 1 2. 1 8. 0 9 KfNNETH RODRIGUES h PARTNEfiS IHC L A N � A S S O C I A T E S Q 9, � S. O J 4 U '2 f H l 4 5 N 0 R T H W H I 5 N A N R D. 5 U I T E / 2 0 0 L 1 M 1 N A R Y L A N D S� A P� P LandscapeArchitecture/Planning ,^=so �--�� 425 Clyde Avenue In/ Mountain View. California 94043 4 0 U H T A I N V I E W C A 6 5 0. 9 6 5. 0 7 0 � � � 6�� _ 1�-^0� P Y Y M A R K E T (650) 691-9711 f.(650) 691-9713 -- - F�_ .�_ . ...� —� � �� ----- --- - _ ----- � . . , - :. . _. � , .. � - I � r �� : z ,.� � �.. � _ � ti �. , , .� " :s ' ,�., ' '- ; . � , TING � � �` - EXfSTING 1 STORY ' RCIAL ._ � .� �.. �: ��i ,;, �' : �- � " � RICUL"TURAL RESIDE ' � � � . ,4.,,�.. ,�,.. . � � ta :� . �' �� . , ..-• • . • ._ � . _.. , , � _ � � t � `.� ,`.`�..� . : +r .. ....., . . . ":. . ,..... , . .-.. . . ;. -a. .�. .-. . - ."^'^ �J �� . _ . : �......e.' . , . . �� ti . . ' ., . :. � � . . . . ". � � : ;:. • - t . . _ •. . , �,, _ _ ___.__ ' r+< ,t „;,.: ,.. . , _ , . . �. w _ . s . .. - . �• . � . _ -s. . '. ""D' ,�:� _ . �., :., • A ` ,S, ' . „� � :�� . . 'i'. . . . . . .� , ..N - ��.. . � `, �> . .�«. � . , . ,.' .. ,.. r � ' - _ ,� ��. , EPLUM . . •, - u13 � . �- , 8'PLUM � 1' P 1' UM P �) 16 5'-6' � �t�2 �� , . ' , _ , , � �' - -- a•a�u►n t� �g # - - �t24 __ - � �t tt � tt1 20 �21 #� � �23 �25 tc e^r�u►.� � - - # � �t3p � a -� __ � � �,, I I i . ! I . � �., I � � 6'PIUAI 8"PLUM 6'PLUM . ; . � . . . . .-- — — � , I � I I I ' �� <' r � '� : �}( � ` _ j x1�9 r� NEW. - °_ � � - � '' � , . . �� NEW FALI 3 x _ I : �� ° � r � �34 -�'a y �_ .�37gPE�R ' ` `, ::;` . tt100 �•�sH tt112 s•�sH � 7t12 "P4-� � #140 _ T �149 »'�sr+ � 3 � a158 ° � ' � �'- N�`�IF: �i.:!. , . , � �� I� 1f �4 • � U � 8'ASMI P'� 2 � ,. MU�ERR a;'b� "t' \ / '+ � �3A5PEAR _ I � I P�CD 4 - - -- - - ' 4'CRAPE MVR YASH -- - - > r � "-- - • -- , � �� 1 . _ h I �39 8'PEAR ' . �1� ^ #9 . .. _ .—_ .. �-- I ' �� : X 7U APE MVR -- .- r �� i i _ . ,, ; ,' I � ' . 9 �- � I I , ; . �$ c � V_... _= a }� �,+ '� 1 . . \ �. 1 PLUM I , � P U . -_ \ , � � . ' �. . �. •. ' . ;• ` I a�siRC� _ a nsM --_ 2 i _� - I 59 , � #167 I, EXISTING ; � x �' l. x10 �� x x114 X tt123 ' �:; � _ P_ ��_ rci.uM i� "PIUM #97x x q tt101 _ a as 7"CFAPE MYR. � �-- �( � 7 1�� ,� I , � , ; _ 8'PLU �' ��.. , r \� - --- , . _.,'.� � ' �� .. I i a• siRCH - is��sri •au u x #1 5Q �. -- zo'►,�.eEmv x NEW RETAI L i � --- _ , . ' ; - - tt tt141 e•�sH I -: � i � BUILDINGi ' i ' � - - � , , �t 136 _ � ; - i ' � � ,' , �t102 - - - — �_ i � - I i �'�� x ,r�sr+ tt14�,-� _-- - r�uM < : PAD 1 O� � i i , � .'. �0'ASH � � ! � I �ti(i ti,� '.�� J� 8`CRAPE � }( X1�3 i t9 tt9� tt103 x110 u115 1t122 `�Y �„ �J __ _ "'�v �--�" __ # �� -- e•�uMx i�168 � ':. i e�c�MaHOa I tt43 �c�A►,wr,oR ` 5'PLUM 5'ASN t6"ASH � 129 �{,, . --L ` -i__ � 8'PLUM �- � �— �, . 8"ASH 8"CRAPE MYR. ,� __, --t- � - r. � 7t�j10"SYC �"�� -- - - — __ X6'PIUM �12�"MULBERFY� I AMPFIOR__� � e � � , I ' � >' 04 "�09 _�J16 ' �121 `x" _X - - # '; - ... ,�,��uM , i � - - � � , , -- _ _ _ -- __j�_� � � _ -3'CRAPE 5"CRAPE MYR TCRAPE MVR � 8'ASN � - - I <.+ : i .. �s , � 4 � . ._ . � �'��_. , � -�-.-_ i �j -�'"., � -- MYR. -�_ . _ .. . _.dS_ �1.�1[ X � --- - .�M ... O— 8 ASH,I -- ��6� .�X# � 9"PIUM �`, #4 l� , #4 �3'CAMPH�R �' - : _ .� ,%�` ` 1 2 0 41 2 � ,' - - , ■ — - -- '— 6"PLUM I �_ —.� -�- - —_ 5"PLUM 1tiF)M S1�5 ; gg T _ - - - -- -- --L-- -- __ : _ _ _ _ _. xima� 6"PIUM it171-� x ;, i . � PASF+ � -- -� -- . . �B it�� 5'CAMPHQLi. � -�-� --- -- - - MYR .. �-� .. - CRhPE MYR. . _ _�11"ASH 3'PIUM � rJ � � �faVR. �j�� O .._ - -- �S2Z O O O .-- . O � GSYC. L I 4 . EXISTING _ _ _ :PeMVa.- �� - ir�sri - ----_ ... -- I � � �� _ -_ - �O � ��7 l� }C � __ 5'CRAPE t3"PIUM_ � � �� , �t7 \ PAD I 7-3'CRAPE _ . ---� - � ; , __ 4"_ASFi _ __� _ _ V � w � � � ,. -- _I ', ._. . J�47 _ ._ � _._'. _ _".-__ �� -.�___ "_T_"-_ __.�_""_ 11� ..� i .. :� '•• � 6,144 SF , --- ---- _-- a•�uM x , � � �— _ :. ti169 s�P unn- -- tt50 �S _ ( � ;. - �. O' o- � I 1'PLUM(BROKENI � ' -- - - � ; 17'EUC j- - - -- b- - - I � � _ �}. O _ . 8 : UM - -- -- - - - '_ - - - i0'MULL1ERHV g s9 I � x. . _ _— 1( � o I. _ -- - - - -- - � - --- - � - ,,.,.. o . � a �r=-� � ; if1� --- , -- - i i i — T-- � +1 .. - . . - --- . — � , --- � � //i �-.i � �'I � , -__ .___.-._'.__. __ _�_..._ , . �, e r � I � , � o � � o --- ----,�-- o � ;, ; , _ __ � i � o— _ � I -_ - 8 gd tt106 �t10�7� x118 �1� it134 A�1� �� ° ;, „ ° � ,• i- tt6 �e�euc � #145 �t153 �163 tt170 � � . SYC 6"CRAPE MYR 12^ASH 5"CRAPE MVR 14"ASH 3"MYR 9'ASH 5'CRAPE MYR ��$H � 16"MU�BEqpV A•p�� '_ `,' V ��• i ' � , , ; � '� J ' _ ' _ , . - _ __ -_ , _ .. _ :F I I I �:1 I i �'.- i i i' � ;I' �i � '1 �. I i t- - i; 'L i � i , 1 � , ' - - - - ^� � T� � � -��' _ __� _ ' , .� t.l- � . I. ,�' . , :. � � � I . � ., � � - � ' _ _ - b "�' -� 1 i , � i. , - L_ i,__+. _. .. . �� . � ._ . . _ ... . _. —�^�` - xY 77r'� - - - - ,�"- _ .-� . . � .. ._ _. � .�, '� �� ,!`<; � t . I � . _ Y E� r r,� . � � �- _ � ..-_._ � r � � . � __ .._ ._--- -, I ---- -- � , . , �' � ' L= i r- ' . _ , t .:; -- ---- - , tY ' : i. _ , e � -- J ' __ ' , f � - --- ---- -- �,r � � . _ �- �, �9'. VC _ f � I - -- -- � � a�s�K I� EXISTING TREES TO BE � � � � � � � �� =l, �`�� i EXtSTING � --- � ; I i � �. �'hEE �I SHOPS REMOVED(TYPICAL) �' � ' -- � ' 1 ` ' ' � - � � ; I I � �� svc- �92 � ' � � � I � ' I � � � �� .I�� i! EXISTING ;� EXISTING ! NEW� NEW ' NEW � '� ' ,;.� ;. . y i usr �� _ _ � --- , MAJOR 5 � MAJOR 4 � MAJOR 3 , MAJOR 2 � MAJOR 1 � � I ''� � ; � , _ �8"SYC � � -- ' � �. ` � I i i �� a°Pa 9us sPa t?� � REMA�IN�TYP ES TO � , �� ' ._. !, _ - -�� , ' ' _ , `, � � �gsrc ( ICAL) I I � , '% � - � � i � � I '` :--� _ -- ! ,.- ; , � i , � � � tt90 ��. i�10'SYG. � ��17'PRUNUSSPP (�) � ( -- I . ' � #�93 LOCUST ---- ----- - - - - -- ----- ---- - - ------ -- -- -- -- — -- c I __ /` , , _ l � , _ 1 � � ' � � � , \ ` \ � i I I_ _ �17� #69 � i; , �' � j � �� r �r rt n � � � #7 n71 � I 65�64�63� � __� � , - ' - 87..86_85__8�. �33. _82 _81tt80 9�78;i7 it7 �75#74 #73 �72 tt #61 !t �t56 tt 5 �54 �53�52 ' •,, ' s`ws.:;y..�. - "'j _ I y .� ,; "rd s-_ � �r, �.�a� { z' K' � :��,' �. y "'�CT� � '�j �%�" � - � EXISTIN , � �4 r � k. � �,. �:`� L� ' � �5 ��.�Y .. .. �e ' • .. . .. �' � "„ r' � � , ?:�� } . . � . � 4-STOR s � 5�' ��. .. " � y -'� �� ,�, ..� ; _ �. _ . s _. .,.HO�EL � �g '�`f ` _._. - - - � ., . � �. � "� ; 9"SYC 5"SYC 3"LIQ. 3"LIQ 3"LIQ. 3"LIQ. 3'SYC 6"SYC. 8"SYC 6"SVC 6"SYC 2"SYC 3'SYC. 5"SYC 3"SYC 5"SYC. 2"SYC. 28"SYC 24"SYC 17EUC 24"SYC 12'EUC 24"SYC. 17'EUC 24"SYC. 15'SYC 18"EUC 5'SYC. 8"SYC 8"SVC 8"SYC. 6"SVC 10"POPLAR 6"SYC 5'POPLAR B"SYC i0"SVC. Note: Tree numbering corresponds to project arborist's site tree tags P W M A R K E T . A A�E� A ��H _____ _______ := K R P, z . 0 3 z /HOME TEAD SSO�,ATE S RET 5 . � A 1 L . _ ___ _ _ _______ __ __ _ . � � Landscape Architecture!Planning -- / -__ � / CU PERTlNO, CAL 425Clyde A�e�,Ue _ _____ � _--- - , � Mountain View, California 94043 ---- - - -- (650) 691-9711 f.(650) 691-9713 \� I �� - 0 3.1 2 .1 0 0 2. 1 0. 1 0 M A S T E R S 1 T E P L A N AND SITE TREE SURVEY ��?=--'- °� K E N N E T H R O D F i G U C S d P A R T N E R 5 I N C 0 9. 1 5. 0 9 H o ? t y << 5 N 0 R T H W H I S 11 A N R D. 5 U � T E / y 9 0 �"=60 0 60' 120' 180' 4 UN AIH YIEW CA 6 5 0.9 ti 5.J 1 0 0 �� M A R K E T - �� ' __ �� - _ n�' ��-_. � � _'. . . :-'. �.'_-. �-��. .. _ ..-:� '__ "" - ..::� : - _. '_. '_' __'