.02 MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance OFFICE OF COM�IUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,�
.
CTTY HALL
10300 TORRE AVF:NUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT 1 N Q (408) 777-3308 • F.�X (408) 777-3333 • planningC�3cupertino.or�
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 2 Agenda Date: October 26, 2010
Application: MCA-2010-04
Applicant: City of Cupertino
Location: Citywide
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Municipal Code Amendment to adopt a Green Building Ordinance (Continued from
October 12, 2010)
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt
the proposed draft Green Building Ordi:zance in accordance with the Model Ordinance
(See Attachment 1) with additional changes as recommended by the Commission.
BACKGROUND
On October 12, 2010, the Planning Cc�mmission reviewed the draft ordinance (See
Attachment 2, October 12 staff repo rt) and conducted the public hearing. The
Commission discussed various components of the draft ordinance, including the
threshold levels for new construction a 1d renovations/ additions, verification options,
LEED EBOM (Leadership in Energy ancl Environmental Design for Existing Buildings:
Operations and Maintenance) and incen :ives. The Commission recommended that staff
provide additional information and rE�sponses to questions that were raised, and
continued the public hearing to October 26, 2010.
DISCUSSION
A summary of the Commissiori s comr.lents and questions are provided below with
additional information and responses provided by staff and the consultant. Responses are ,
provided in italics. Also, each section (as ��pplicable) has a recommendation on changes to
the draft ordinance for the Planning Comnissiori s consideration.
2-1
MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 2
Planning Commission Comments/Questi ons on Reference Standards
1. How are points accumulated for higher density/smaller unit buildings?
Points in the rating systems are accurnulated per the GPR checklists for single family
residential and multiple family residentiai projects. You may access these checklists on Build
It Green's website at zvwu�.builditgreen.o7g/Quidelines--checklists. In terms of the benefit that
density provides, for example, a project o�' over 15 units per acre would get 10 points in the
multi family rating system. Being close to transit and services provides another 3 points. And
multi family units are inherently more energy efficient than a single family house, so they
would likely earn approximately 10 additic�nal points in the energy category.
2. Provide more information about LEED EBOM (LEED for Existing Buildings:
Operations and Maintenance) (See Attachment 3 for more details on LEED EBOM),
and clarify what the difference is bet�veen EBOM and other certifications, and what
the benefits are to allow TIs (tenant 'mprovements) in an EBOM certified building
without separate certifications for eacli TI project. Are the certification costs the same
or different than other LEED certification costs?
LEED for Existing Buildings: Operatior� and Maintenance is a rating system specifically
developed for buildings that are already bz ilt and, in most instances pre-date the LEED rafing
system. The focus of LEED EBOM is pi�tting in place practices and procedures to meet the
goals of the LEED rating system, whicl� are to reduce resource consumption and provide
healthy working and living environmen `s. In comparison, the LEED rating systems for
Building Design and Construction, Comrnercial Interiors, and Core and Shell are focused on
the selection of design strategies, buildin� s systems, and materials that will achieve the same
goals, once the building is completed and placed in sef-z�ice. To earn a LEED EBOM
certification a project must have at least one year of operation data, which is used to establish
performance benchmarks against which � rerequisites and credits are measured. The LEED
EBOM certification is valid for a five-year period.
Key p,arts of LEED EBOM are establishif�g procedures for reducing energy and water use in
existing buildings through systems upgrades and fixture replacement. An optional credit
(Materials and Resources Credit 3) speci �cally addresses tenant improvements by requiring
that owners establish tenant improveme�zt standards and criteria that are consistent with
LEED criteria. Any future tenant im��rovement projects must be consistent with these
standards and criteria for the building to inaintain its LEED EBOM certification. The benefit
of allowing building owners to conduct a LEED EBOM precertification is that the owner
would be reducing the impact of the en;-ire project, not just the area of individual tenant
improvements. This approach is also m�re comprehensive than the piecemeal approach of
addressing individual tenant improvemenis over multiple years.
The costs for LEED EBOM are slightlir lower than for LEED for New Construction or
Commercial Interiors. The main savin,�s is in the cert�fication fees from GBCI (Green
Building Certification Institute is the certi�CCation organization under the U.S. Green Building
Council for LEED). For example a 50,C'00 square foot new construction project would be
charged $2,000, while the same building ir. EBOM would be charged $1,500.
�-2
MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 3
3. What is the flow chart difference if a d�velopment went through LEED exterior versus
LEED EBOM?
Informal Certi cation
The development process for a LEED N�w Construction project involves the following: a)
submit LEED checklist with building �ermit application, c) submit green review fee, d)
drawings and LEED checklist reviewed b:� City consultant, e) project determined to meet the
intent of the applicable LEED rating systE m, fl building permit issued, g) project built per the
construction documents and consistent u�ith the LEED checklist, g) conduct commissioning
during and at the completion of the construction process (LEED prerequisites and required by
Cal Green for projects over 10,000 sq. ft.), h) receive permit "final" and certificate of
occupancy. The City inspectors could che��k that the built project is consistent with the plans,
as they could for all of the City Determina ion projects.
Formal Certification
The development process for a LEED NE w Consiruction project involves the following: a)
register the project with GBCI, b) subn!it registration and LEED checklist with building
permit application, c) submit refundable d�posit, d) building permit issued, e) build the project
per the construction documents and �,onsistent with the LEED checklist, � conduct
commissioning during and at the complf�tion of the construction process, g) receive permit
"final" and temporary cerhficate of occupzncy, h) complete and submit LEED certification, i)
receive cerhfication, j) release of refundabl�� deposit.
EBOM Precertification,for Tenant Improvement Prolects
The EBOM process involves the followin,�: a) include evidence of active EBOM certification
with building permit application and derronstrate that the proposed TI is consistent with the
TI standards established in the EBOM ce�•tcfication, b) building permit issued, c) TI inspected
by City staff at final permit/Certificate of Occupancy issued. The City inspectors could check
that the built project is consistent wi Fh the plans, as they could for all of the City
Determination projects.
Staff Recommendation on Reference S�-andards
• Staff recommends providing LEE� EBOM as an alternative to LEED requirements
for renovations/additions with Informal Verification. The LEED EBOM
requirement can be achieved at t�ie same levels as the LEED requirements (e.g.
LEED EBOM Certified, etc.).
• On Alternate Reference Standards (Section 19.78.050), the draft ordinance clarifies
that the decision maker of the ap��lication will determine whether a project may
use an alternate reference stanc ard that is equivalent to the minimum or
exemplary standards per the requi rement chart in Section 19.78.060. This was not
clarified in the draft ordinance the ��ommission reviewed on October 12.
?-3
MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 4
Planning Commission Comments on Re� idential New Construction
1. Consider a threshold level based upori the square footage for residential projects� and
require additional points for homes c ver a certain size since larger homes have the
potential to create greater greenhouse ,;as impacts than smaller homes.
2. Consider using one rating system (i.e., Green Point Rated) and a uniform point
requirement to simplify the requireme 1ts.
Staff Recommendation for Residential New Construction:
In response to the Commissiori s request, :�taff suggests using the following thresholds for
new residential construction:
• Single-family homes (R-1, RHS and A-1 zones) - require 75 GPR points for homes or
projects with an average home size c�f <_ 2,500 square feet and 100 GPR points for
homes > homes or projects with an avE�rage home size of 2,500 square feet.
• Multi-family homes - require 75 GPR ��oints for projects with an average unit size of 5
800 square feet and 100 GPR points for units > 800 square feet. For multi-family
projects with multiple units, the requ:rement will be based upon the average size of
the units in the project.
• This system would not use a threshold based on the number of units in a project.
• Continue to provide flexibility of eithe r the GPR or LEED standard.
As shown in Attachment 4, three cities in ;�anta Clara County (Morgan Hill, Palo Alto and
Sunnyvale) use tiers/thresholds based c►n square footage. Thresholds used by cities
range from 1,500 square feet to 2,550 squ<<re feet. Palo Alto and Morgan Hill also include
a tiered system that requires an addition� l point for every 70 square feet over the square
footage threshold. GPR uses a threshold of 1,$50 square feet for 3 bedroom homes and
2,600 square feet for 4 bedroom homes. GPR grants an additional point or two for homes
that fall below these thresholds. Staff sug gests a threshold system similar to Sunnyvale's
to keep the process simple. The unit size� suggested by staff are based on the typical size
of a single-family home and a multi-famil:�, t�wo-bedroom apartment.
Planning Commission Comments on No n-residential New Construction
1. Lower the threshold level to 25,000 sqiiare feet versus 50,000 square feet for the higher
certification requirements. Modify the table to show projects with >_ 10,000 square feet
- 25,000 square feet as a mid-size proj �ct, and all projects over 25,000 square feet as a
large project.
2. Provide the % of recent new constructions in the City above and below 25,000 square
feet in size. The Commission felt that the draft ordinance threshold of 50,000 square
feet was too high and would not capfiire a significant number of buildings that could
considerably add to the green house €;as impacts in the region. Attachment 5 provides
2-4
MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 5
data over the past five years and indicatE�s that about 31 % of new construction projects are
above 25,000 square feet and 21 % are aboz�e 50,000 square feet.
3. Consider Formal Verification requirement only for the projects over 50,000 square
feet; consider Informal Verification rf�quirement for all other projects (this was one
Commissioner's suggestion).
4. Consider Formal Verification requir �ment for all new construction projects; not
comfortable with the Informal Verification for new construction projects (this was one
Commissioner's suggestion).
5. Consider Informal Verification for all projects; start at the lower level requirements
that the Informal Verification offers rather than the mandatory requirements of
Formal Verification (this was one Commissioner's suggestion).
Staff Recommendation for Non-Residenti �l New Construction:
Based on the Commissiori s comments, staff is suggesting the following changes to the
draft ordinance:
• Reduce thresholds for non-residential new construction to 25,000 square feet. Based
on this change, non-residential new a�nstruction projects < 10,000 square feet would
require CALGreen Mandatory, >_ 10,i)00 - 25,000 square feet would require LEED
(Leadership in Energy and Environm�ntal Design) Certification, and >25,000 square
feet would require LEED Silver certification.
• Require Formal Verification requirement for new construction projects above 50,000
square feet.
Planning Commission Comments on No::�-residential Renovations/Additions
1. Consider lowering the square footage threshold for non-residential
renovations/additions to 10,000 squ<<re feet (rather than the previously proposed
25,000 square feet) to capture renovation/addition projects that could considerably
add to green house gas impacts and to 1ae consistent with the Phase II
recommendations
2. For the threshold of three out of four building systems, require that one shall be the
HVAC system.
3. Provide the % of commercial TIs belc�w and above 25,000 square feet. Attachment 6
provides data over the past five years ancl indicates that about 12 % of renovations/additions
are above 25,000 square feet and 7% are c�bove 50,000 square feet. The data does not provide
details on building systems involved in thE renovations/additions.
4. Consider Informal Verification requirement for all renovation projects.
2-5
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui ding Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 6
Staff Recommendation for Non-Residential Renovations/Additions:
Based on the Commissiori s comments, �taff is suggesting the following changes to the
draft ordinance:
• Reduce threshold to 10,000 square feet as recommended by the Commission. Based on
this change, non-residential minor renovations/additions would require CALGreen
Mandatory, and non-residential ma:or renovations/additions (over 50% of total
existing floor area, and at least 10, 000 square feet of renovation/ addition, and
replacement or alteration of the HV1�C system and two of the following: building
envelope, hot water system, or lightin�; system) would require LEED Certified.
• For building systems, require that fc�r three out of four systems, one shall be the
HVAC system.
• Require Informal Certification for all r��novations/additions.
Planning Commission Comments on Scc�pe and Applicability:
1. Consider providing a grace period oj� either 3 months or 6 months for the effective
date after adoption of the ordinance.
2. No exemptions from the ordinance for planning projects that have received
entitlements, since such projects would not be exempt from the upcoming Cal Green
building codes.
Staff Recommendation on Scope and App!icability:
Based on the Commission s comments, � taff is suggesting the following changes to the
draft ordinance:
• Consider the effective date to be 30 days from the adoption of the ordinance, but
provide language in the ordinance th;�t says the ordinance requirements on building
permits will not become effective un:il six months after adoption of the ordinance.
This essentially shortens the time fraine for anyone to mount legal challenges to the
ordinance to 30 days, and still allows for the "grace period" of six months from the
date of adoption before the ordinance takes effect on building permit submittals. Staff
feels that a six month period will a11o�N applicants adequate time to prepare building
permit documents after being notified of the new ordinance requirements.
• Do not provide exemptions from thf� ordinance for previously approved planning
projects that submit for building permits after the effective date of the ordinance.
2-6
MCA-2010-04 Green BuL ding Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 7
Planning Commission Comments on Ve��ification
1. The verification process should be st�•eamlined and should not add building permit
plan check or construction time due to a required certification.
Staff Recommendation on Streamlining t]te Verification Process:
Based on the Commissiori s comments, :;taff is suggesting the following change to the
draft ordinance:
• For projects that require Forrr�al Certification - Grant final building
approval/occupancy (instead of tem�orary occupancy) if all other city requirements
have been met except for certification and a Green Building deposit has been paid per
ordinance requirements.
Planning Commission Comments on FeE�s & Deposits
1. Consider a Green Building deposit an�ount similar to the City of San Jose that is least
onerous, and allows for flexible metliods of deposit such as use of a line of credit
rather than bond to fulfill the deposit i equirements.
Staff Recommendation on Fees/Deposits
• Green Building Deposit - Staff is seek ing the Planning Commission s guidance on the
best approach. The City of San Jose's refundable Green Building deposit is $0.30 per
square foot, up to a maximum of $30,000 per building or shell permit. However, it has
been found that the deposit amount i;� less than the cost of certification and is not an
incentive to encourage applicants to :ollow through with certification. The amount
recommended in the draft ordinance is higher but commensurate to the cost of
certification. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages.
• Allow for flexible methods of deposit, such as use of a line of credit, or other means as
acceptable to the Director of Commun ity Development.
Planning Commission comments on Ina�ntives for Exemplary Projects
1. Consider express building plan chE�ck processes as an incentive for exemplary
standard projects requiring certificatic n.
2. Consider incentives to encourage certiEication and exemplary projects.
3. For zoning code adjustments to Fl��or Area Ratio and off-street parking under
"Incentives," would this be determ.ned and be decided upon under the public
hearings for ASA approval?
Staff Recommendation on Exemplary Standards/Incentives
• Staff does not recommend offering expedited plan checking as an incentive for
exemplary projects, particularly since staff currently makes it a point to move every
2-7
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 8
project forward as expeditiously as possible in the interest of providing excellent
customer service. Staff also belie ves it would not send the right message to
applicants about the City's customer � ervice if their plans were held back even if their
application was submitted earlier. Therefore, staff does not recommend this
approach. The City currently offers o ver-the-counter "express" plan checks for minor
projects and five-day "express" plan checks for some smaller projects that do not
require extensive review, where appli�:ants pay a higher fee. Such express plan checks
will continue to be offered to projects - :hat qualify.
• Staff additionally recommends the f��llowing changes that have been incorporated
into the draft ordinance to clarify the i ncentives process:
o Amend the purpose statement to note that the City wishes to encourage projects
that meet or exceed the ordinance ��equirements
o Provide findings for projects to qu�ilify for incentives
o Consider a tiered systems for incer.tives
The following section provides additiona� detail on the changes:
• Staff recommends adding the followir�g language to the Purpose and Intent section of
the ordinance (Section 19.78.010):
"The Cify also wishes to encourage applic�ants to voluntarily adopt practices that are more
environmentally friendly than the minimicm required by this ordinance by providing
incentives for such buildings and structures."
• Staff recommends adding the followir g findings in Section 19.78.080 (Voluntary
Requirements to Obtain Incentives) to be adopted by the decision maker to clarify
when projects may qualify for incenti��es:
Findings:
1. The project greatly exceeds the mi �imum amounts required to meet the exemplary
standards.
2. The proposed use is compatible with tY e surrounding community.
3. The project will greatly advance the gc als of this Chapter.
4. The project will serve as a model for fu ture green construction; will be harmonious.
5. The project is consistent with, and wil! advance the goals of, the General Plan.
• Staff recommends adding the followin g language in Section 19.78.080 (Voluntary
Requirements to Obtain Incentives):
An applicant for a building permit mai� voluntarily opt to meet or exceed the exemplary
standards, and to fulfill the applicable ven fication requirements.
2-8
MCA-2010-04 Green Buil ding Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 9
A. Automatic Incentives. If the applica�it does so, in all cases, the applicant shall obtain a
reduction in applicable building pennit fees by an amount set by a resolution by the
Council as part of the fee schedule.
B. Discretionary Incentives (to be grar�ted b�y the ,final approval body for the planning
a lication .
a. In addition to obtaining the automatic incentive listed above, the applicant can request
at the time of the submittal of the ��lanning application that City authorize the issuance
of one (and only one) of the followi;lg discretionary incentives:
i. A 10 % increase to the maximunc floor area ratio (FAR) authorized by the Municipal
Code.
ii. A 10 % reduction in the amoun t of off-street parking required by Municipal Code
Section 19.100.
• Staff is requesting the Planning Commission's preference on Incentives. Alternatives
include:
o Automatic Incentives
■ Building permit fee reductions (included in the draft ordinance) - Recommended
range 2-5%. The amount sh�ill be set by the Council annually based on
available funding.
OR
■ Matching grants to offset the ccst of certification application (based on funding
availability) - Recommended �unounts - up to $250/single family, $500 for
multi-family and $1000 for no 1-residential. The amount shall be set by the
Council annually based on avai .able funding.
o Zonin� Incentives
■ Increase to maximum floor area ratio (FAR) - Recommended range 5-10%
■ Reduction in amount of off-stre��t parking - Recommended range 5-10%
The draft ordinance includes a 10 % in�:rease/reduction in both cases.
2-9
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui ding Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 10
Comparison Table of the October 12, 2010 Draft Ordinance and Recommended
Amendments based on the �?lanning Commission Discussion
Project Type October 12, 20101)raft Ordinance Recommended Amendments
based on PC Discussion
Thresholds Veri ication Thresholds Veri ication
New Construction
Single-Family � Multi- < 5 homes Formal Verification Average home size Minimum:
Family Residential (Option 1) or 2,500 SF or less, or Informal.
• GPR min. 75 pts. Informal Multi-Family Exemplary: Formal
or LEED certcfied Verification homes (all other
(Option 2) residential zvnes)
average home size
Formal Verification S00 SF or less
for Exemplary • GPR min. 75
points or LEED
Certified
Average home size
>_ 5 homes i Formal Verification more than 2,500 Minimum:
or Informal SF, or Informal.
• GPR min. 100 pts. Verification Multi-Family Exemplary: Formal
or LEED Silver homes (all other
Formal Verification residential Zones)
for Exemplary average home size
more than 800 SF
• GPR min. 100
points or LEED
Silver
Non-Residential < 10,000 SF Informal < 10,000 SF Minimum:
Veri cation f
• CAL Green In ormal.
• CALGreen Mandatory Exemplary: Formal
Mandatory Formal Verificatzon
for Exemplary
Forntal Verification Minimum:
? 10,000 — 50,000 SF or Informal 10,000 — 25,000 SF Informal.
Veriftcation Exem la Formal
• LEED cerhfied Formal Verification . LEED Cert�'fced p ��
for Exemplary
Formal Verification 25 001 or more SF Minimum: 25,001
> 50 000 SF � — 50 000 SF —
' or Informal '
Informal
Verification . LEED Silver
• LEED Silver
Formal Verification 50,001 or more
for Exemplary SF— Formal
Exemplary: Formal
2-10
MCA-2010-04 Green Buil3ing Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 11
Project Type October 12, 2010 I)raft Ordinance Recommended Amendments
based on PC Discussion
Thresholds Veri ication Thresholds Veri ication
Renovations/Additions
Single-Family £� Multi- Single family Informal Single family. Minimum:
family Residential residential >_ 50% of Verification Renovations and/or Informal.
total existing floor additions over areas
area Formal Veri cation Exemplary: Formal
fi that comprise at
for Exemplary least 50 % of the
• CALGreen total existing floor
Mandatory area
• CALGreen
Mandatory
Multi-Family (minor Informal Multi family Minimum:
renovation) Verification (minor). Informal.
Renovations and/or Exemplary: Formal
• CALGreen Formal Verification additions over areas
Mandatory (as for Exemplary that comprise at
applicable to scope) least 50 % of the
tofal existing floor
area, but do not
meet the higher
thresholds for
"major renovations
and additions" in
the cell below.
• CALGreen
Mandatory
Multi family Minimum:
Multi-Famil (ma'or Formal Verification
y 1 (major). Informal.
renovation) or Informal
Verification Renovations and/or Exemplary: Formal
additions that
• LEED Cerhfied comprise at least
Formal Verification
for Exemplary 50 % of the total
existing floor area,
are at least 10,000
square feet, and
replace or alter the
HVAC system and
at least two of the
following: building
envelope, hof water
system, and
lighting system.
, • GPR min. 75 pts
or LEED
Certified or
LEED EBOM
�-11
MCA-2010-04 Green Buil ding Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 12
Project Type October 12, 2010 I)raft Ordinance Recommended Amendments
based on PC Discussion
Thresholds Veri ication Thresholds Veri ication
Certified
� Alternate
. Reference
Standard per
Section
19.78.050
Renovations/Additions, Minor Renovation Informal Minor. Minimum:
Non-Residential Verification Renovations and/or Informal.
CALGreen additions that do Exem la Formal
Mandatory Formal Verification not meet the higher p ��
for Exemplary thresholds for
"major renovations
and additions" in
the cell below.
• CALGreen
Mandatory
Major Renovation Formal Verification Major. Minimum:
(over 50 % of total or Informal Renovations and/or Informal.
floor area, and at least Verification addifions that Exemplary: Formal
25,000 SF of comprise at least
renovation/addition, . Formal 50% of the total
and replacement or Verification for existing floor area,
alteration of 3 of the 4 Exemplary are at least 10,000
following systems: square feet, and
� HVAC, building replace or alter the
envelope, hot water HVAC system and
system, or lighting two of the
system) following: building
envelope, hot water
• LEED certified system, and
lighting system.
� LEED Cerhfied
or LEED EBOM
Certified
• Alternate
Reference
Standard per
Section
19.78.050
2-12
MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance October 26, 2010
Page 13
Environmental Consideration
The draft Green Building Ordinance is co:lsidered categorically exempt per Section 15308
Class 8(Actions by Regulatory Agenci�s for Protection of the Environment) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (��EQA). Therefore, no further environmental
review is necessary to adopt this ordinance.
Next Steps
Staff will incorporate the Planning Commission's comments into the draft ordinance. The
Planning Commissiori s recommendation will then be presented to the City Council for a
final decision.
Prepared by Aki Honda Snelling, AICP, S��nior Planner
Reviewed by: Approved by:
,
a ao Aarti Shrivastava
ity Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 Model Resolution & Model Ordinance
Attachment 2 October 12, 2010 F'lanning Commission staff report
Attachment 3 LEED EBOM/LEf;D CI Comparison by Global Green
Attachment 4 Comparison TablE� (Sunnyvale, Morgan Hill, Palo Alto)
Attachment 5 % of New Constr data over 25,000 SF
Attachment 6 % of Tenant Improvement data over 25,000 SF
G:�Planning�PDREPORT�pcMCAreports�2010�MCA-2010-04 Oct.26.doc
�'-13
Attachment 1
MCA-2010-05
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 T��rre Avenue
Cupertino, (�alifornia 95014
MODEL I:ESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMIS� ION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY CC►UNCIL APPROVE THE MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDMENT TO CREATE CHAP TER 19.78 (GREEN BUILDING) OF THE
CUPERTINO n1UNICIPAL CODE
The Planning Commission recommends �pproval of the proposed amendment to the
City of Cupertino Municipal Code as sho��n in Attachment A attached herewith.
PASSED AND APPROVED this da � of 2010, at a Regular Meeting of
the Planning Commission of the City of C�zpertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair
Director of Community Development Planning Commission
2-14
MODEL (�RDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CC)UNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 19.78 TO CIZEATE A GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a properly noticed public hearing on
October 12, 2010;
WHEREAS, the public hearing was contir.ued to and conducted on October 26, 2010;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission aciopted Resolution # '' to recommend that
the City Council adopt this ordinar.ce;
WHEREAS, the City Council conductecl a properly noticed public hearing on this
ordinance;
WHEREAS, adoption of the ordinance �vill improve the environment and is in the
public interest.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Statement of Purpose.
This ordinance establishes a new chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code to create a
green building ordinance.
Section 2. Code Amendment.
Chapter 19.78, entitled "Green Buildi:zg," of the Cupertino Municipal code is
established as shown in Attachment A. .
Section 3. Severabilitu.
Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or
circt�mstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful,
unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other
provision of this Ordinance or the applic�ition of this Ordinance to any other person or
circumstance and, to that end, the provisis�ns hereof are severable.
Section 4. E ective Date.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days from adoption as provided
by Government Code Section 36937.
Section 5. Certification.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall give
notice of its adoption as required by law. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36933,
a summary of this Ordinance may be published and posted in lieu of publication and
posting of the entire text.
99582.2
2-15
Section 6. CEQA. Because this projE�ct will assure the maintenance, restoration,
enhancement, or protection of the envir��nment and does not relax the regulation of
construction activities or standards allowing environmental degradation, this project is
exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA G aidelines section 15308.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeti 1g of the Cupertino City Council the day
of 2010 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Council
on this of 2010 by the fol: owing vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
99582.2
�.-16
City of Cupertino
CHAPTER 19.7f�: GREEN BUILDING
19.78.010 Purpose and Intent
This Chapter is intended to support a"whc�le systems" approach to the design, construction,
location, and operation of buildings and structures to help mitigate the environmental,
economic, and social impacts of constructi �n, demolition, and renovation of buildings and
structures. The City wishes to promote g-een building practices that minim;ze the use of
energy, water, and other natural resources , vhile promoting a healthy and productive indoor
environment. The City also wishes to encoL rage applicants to voluntarily adopt practices that
are more environmentally friendly than the :rinimum required by this ordinance by providing
incentives for such buildings and structures.
19.78.020 Definitions
The following terms shall have the following definitions for purposes of this Chapter:
A. "Building Envelope" means the sep�.ration between the interior and the exterior
environments of a building in order to provide structural integrity, moisture control,
temperature control, and air pressure cc�ntrol. The principal physical components of the
building envelope include the foundation, roof, walls, and windows.
B. "Decision maker" means the person c r entity with final approval authority over the
underlying project.
C. "Exemplary Standards" mean the stan��ards that correspond to the requirements of a
particular project and are listed in columr� 2 of the chart that appears in section 19.78.060.
D. "Green Building Checklist" means a c lecklist, typically with prerequisites and credits
and/or points that is developed by the aG ministrators of green building certification systems
and used to determine whether a develo�ment project can achieve certification.
E. "Minimum Standards" mean the minimtm standards that apply to a particular project and
are listed in column 1 of the chart in Secti��n 19.78.060.
F. "Required Verificatiori' means the star dards that correspond to the requirements of a
particular project and are listed in coluinn 3 of the chart in Section 19.78.060, and which
verification procedures are fully set forth in section 19.78.070.
19.78.030 Adoption of Green Standards by P.eference
The following codes are hereby adopted by rE�ference:
A. GPR �Green Point Ratin� Standards. T71e three following Green Building Guidelines that
are administered by Build It Green "BIG" ►:
a. Single Family New Home Constructic n(2009-11 version).
b. Single Family Home Remodeling (2007 version).
c. Multifamily New Home Construction (2009-11 version).
995723
2-�7
B. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Envirc nmental Desi�n) Standards. The following rating
� systems developed by the U.S. Green �►uilding Council, and administered by the Green
Building Certification Institute (GBC�:
a. LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovation.
b. LEED 2009 for Existing Buildings: Op �rations & Maintenance.
c. LEED 2009 for Commercial Interiors.
d. LEED 2009 for Core and Shell Develo��ment.
e. LEED 2009 for Schools New Construction and Major Renovation.
f. LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Develo:�ment.
g. LEED 2009 for Existing Buildings OpE�ration and Maintenance (EBOlVn.
19.78.040 Minimum Rec�uirements
On or after � ';: 2011, the City shall iiot issue any building permit unless, in addition to
meeting all other legal requirements, the decision maker determines that:
A. The project complies with the applicabLe "�n;mum requirements" set forth in the first
column of the chart in Section 19.78.060; � nd
B. The project met the applicable required v�rification per Section 19.78.070.
19.78.050 Alternate Reference Standards
The decision maker may declare that an alternate reference standard is equivalent to the
• minimum standards or exemplary standard s per the chart in Section 19.78.060, if the decision
maker finds that:
A. The applicant has utilized an alternate co nprehensive green building rating system that:
a. Is comprehensive, and applies standa rds that are, when taken as a whole, as stringent as
the GPR and LEED standards;
b. Addresses a comprehensive scope of green building issues including energy efficiency,
water efficiency, resource efficient ma terials, and healthy building practices;
c. Includes a formalized certification prc►cess that incorporates third party verification; and
d. Includes a set of standards that is comparable to the applicable minimum and/ or
exemplary standards.
B. The project will:
1. Meet or exceed the applicable minimtun and/or exemplary standards.
2. Advance the purposes of this Chapte��.
Examples of alternate comprehensive green building rating systems may include: Living
Building Challenge, Building Research Esta�lishment Environmental Assessment Method (UK),
and Comprehensive Assessment System for ]3uilding Envirorunental Efficiency (Japan).
Dr� io-22-io
L -�I S
19.78.060. Standards for New Construction, Renovations and Additions
The following chart lists the minimum stanclards that apply for new construction, renovations
and additions.
Column 1 ��olumn 2 Column 3
Minimum Standards Exemp lary Standards Required Verification
See §19.78.060.
a. Residential
i. Single Family homes (R-1,
A-1, RHS zones) average . GPR r.tinimum 125 pts. Minimum: Informal.
home size 2,500 SF or less, or Exem la Formal.
P rY�
or . LEED Gold Alternate Reference Standard
Multi-Family homes (all
other residential zones) (Minimum and Exemplary):
average home size 800 SF or Formal.
less.
• GPR min. 75 points or
• LEED Certified
• Alternate Reference
Standard per Section
19.78.050
ii. Single Family homes (R-1,
A-1, RHS zones) average • GPR r:unimum 125 pts. Minimum: Informal.
home size more than 2,500 or Exem la Formal.
P rY�
SF, . LEED Gold Alternate Reference Standard
or (Minimum and Exemplary):
Multi-Family homes (all Formal.
other residential zones)
average home size more
than 800 SF.
• GPR min.100 points or
• LEED Silver
• Alternate Reference
Standard per Section
19.78.050
b. Non-Residential
i. Less than 10,000 SF.
• CALGreen Mandatory • LEED Gold Minimum: Informal.
Exemplary: Formal.
Dran io-z,a-io
;� �i 9
Column 1 ��olumn 2 Column 3
Minimum Standards ExemZ lary Standards Required Verification
See §19.78.060.
u. 10,000 - 25,000 SF. Minimum: Informal.
• LEED Certified • LEED Gold Exemplary: Formal.
• Alternate Reference Alternate Reference Standard
Standard per Section (Minimum and Exemplary):
19.78.050 � Formal.
iu. 25,001 or more SF. Minimum: 25,001-50,000 SF -
• LEED Silver • LEED Gold informal.
• Alternate Reference 50,001 or more SF - Formal.
Standard per Section Exemplary: Formal.
19.78.050 Alternate Reference Standard
(Minimum and Exemplary):
Formal.
a. Residential
i. Single-family. Renovations
and/or additions over areas
that comprise at least 50% of GPR min.125 pts or Minimum: Informal.
the total existing floor area. �
CALGreen Mandatory ' LE:�D Gold Exemplary: Formal.
u. Multi-family (minor).
Renovations and/or additions . GPR min.100 pts or Minimum: Informal.
over areas that comprise at least � LE:�D Silver Exem lar Formal.
�0% of the total existing floor p y �
area, but do not meet the higher
thresholds for "major
renovations and additions" in
the cell below.
• CALGreen Mandatory
iu. Multi-fami�y (major). • GPR min.125 pts or Minimum: Informal.
fZenovations and/or additions . LE=�D Gold Exemplary: Formal.
that comprise at least 50% of Alternate Reference Standard
the total existing floor area, are (Minimum and Exemplary):
at least 10,000 square feet, and Formal.
replace or alter the HVAC
system and at least two of the
following: building envelope,
hot water system, and lighting
system.
D�� io-z2-io
�' � o
Column 1 ��olumn 2 Column 3
Minimum Standards Exem� lary Standards Required Verification
See §19.78.060.
• GPR min. 75 pts
• LEED Certified or LEED EBOM
Certified
• Alternate Reference Standard
per Section 19.78.050
b. Non-Residential �
i. Minor. Renovations and/or • LEED Gold Minimum: Informal.
additions that do not meet Exemplary: Formal.
the higher thresholds for
"major renovations and
additions" in the cell below.
• CALGreen Mandatory
ii. Maj or. Renovations and/ or • LEED Gold Minimum: Informal.
additions that comprise at Exemplary: Formal.
least 50% of the total existing Alternate Reference Standard
floor area, are at least 10,000 (Minimum and Exemplary):
square feet, and replace or Formal.
alter the HVAC system and
two of the following:
building envelope, hot water '
system, and lighting system.
• LEED Certified or LEED
EBOM Certified
• Alternate Reference
Standard per Section
19.78.050 �
Mixed-Use
For projects with residential and non-residential components, each use shall comply with the
minimum requirements and verification reqt.irements stated above. To meet exemplary
requirements, each use shall comply with thE exemplary requirements stated above.
Note: The requirements in the section "renovaticros and additioris" only apply to the portions of the
building that are subject to the renovation or addi tion.
19.78.070 Required Verification
Verification that a project meets the applica �le environmental standards occurs through either
the formal or informal verification process pE r the requirements in the chart in Section 19.78.060.
A. Formal Verification. A project will rneet the forxnal verification process if the City
determines that the project meets or e:cceeds the applicable thresholds listed in section
Draft 10-22-10
r,
�.- 1
19.78.060 and the applicant submits all of the following to the City in addition to other
application requirements, to assist the City in making that determination:
a. P1arulin� A�plication. A green building checklist that includes cross-references to
appropriate locations in the constru�:tion documents for all prerequisites and selected
points or credits; and demonstrate� that the proposed project meets the applicable
minimum requirements.
b. Building Permit.
i. Proof of project registration with �dministrating body of the applicable reference
standard,
ii. A green building checklist that inclu ies cross-references to appropriate locations in the
construction documents for all pr �requisites and selected points or credits; and
demonstrates that the proposed project meets the applicable m�n;mum requirements,
and
ui. Green Building deposit in an amoun : that may be set by resolution of the City Council.
The applicant may provide the depo� it in the form of cash, or in any other form that the
City finds acceptable to meet the pur��oses of this section. T'he full amount of the deposit
shall be returned upon the certi�ication document being provided per Section
19.78.070(A)(c). If however, the proj��ct does not meet the requirements of this chapter,
as applied to the project, then the C:.ty shall retain the full amount of the deposit, and
shall use the deposit solely to advanc�� the purposes of this Chapter.
c. Within 18 months of Final Occupancy - Certification document for LEED, GPR or
alternate rating standard accepted by the City per the chart in Section 19.78.060.
B. Informal Verification. A project will xneet the informal verification process if the City
determines that the project meets or e rceeds the applicable thresholds listed in section
19.78.060 and the applicant submits all of the following to the City in addition to other
application requirements, to assist the Cii y in making that determination:
a. Planning Application.
i. A green building checklist per Sectior� 19.78.070(A)(a).
b. Building Permit.
i. A green building checklist per Sectior►19.78.070(A)(b)(ii), and
ii. A refundable deposit to defray the C.ty's costs of verifying that the building is designed
to the applicable minimum requirer.-►ents. The City shall release any unused deposit
amounts to the party submitting t1e deposit after determining that all verification
requirements were met.
19.78.080. VoluntaiyRec�uirements to Obtain Incentives
An applicant for a building permit may ��oluntarily opt to meet or exceed the exemplary
standards, and to fulfill the applicable verification requirements.
A. Automatic Incentives. If the applicant does so, in all cases, the applicant shall obtain a
reduction in applicable building permit f�es by an amount set by a resolution by the Council
as part of the fee schedule.
Dr�t io-22-io
,� `� 2
B. Discretionary Incentives.
a. In addition to obtaining the automati�: incentive listed above, the applicant can request at
the time of the submittal of the plaruung application that City authorize the issuance of
one (and only one) of the following d_.scretionary incentives:
i. A 10% increase to the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) authorized by the Municipal
Code.
ii. A 10% reduction in the amount of off-street parking required by Municipal Code
Section 19.100.
b. Findin�s. The decision maker may award a discretionary incentive of the decision
maker's choosing, at the same time a� the approval of the plannulg application, if it finds
all of the following:
i. The project greatly exceeds the nunimum amounts required to meet the exemplary
standards.
u. The proposed use is compatible w ith the surrounding community.
ui. The project will greatly advance tlie goals of this Chapter.
iv. The project will serve as a model i or future green construction; will be harmonious.
v. The project is consistent with and will advance the goals of the General Plan.
19.78.090 Exemptions for Historic or Atypic:il Projects
A. At the applicant's request, the City shall �xempt a project from the duty to comply with one
or more of the minimum standards if eitr er:
a. The project is on a property that is considered "historic" for CEQA purposes, the
applicant demonstrates that the histc�ric nature of the property makes compliance with
the applicable thresholds infeasible, ��nd the applicant has made all reasonable efforts to
mitigate and offset any non-compliance with the threshold(s); or
b. The project includes atypical energy-:•elated design requirements and/or patterns of use,
these limitations make compliance with the threshold(s) not feasible, and the other
components of the project design o� ercompensate for the lack of compliance with the
applicable threshold(s).
B. "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable
period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological
factors.
Draft 10-22-10
� �2 3
Attachment 2
` OFFICB OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,�.
CTTY HALL
10300 TORRE AVEr UE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 I
(408) 777-3308 • FA} (408) 777-3333 • pIanning@cupertulo.org
CU'PERTINt� �
;
� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �
i
� Agenda Item No. � Agenda Date: October 12, 2010
�
Application: MCA-2010-04
Applicant: City of Cupertino �
Location: Citywide '
I
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Municipal Code Amendment to adopt a(ireen Building Ordinance .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt ',
the proposed draft Green Building Ordi lance in accordance with the Model Ordinance �
(See Attachment 1). '
I �
�
� BACKGROUND
� On January 19, 2010, the City Council au thorized staff to initiate the public input process i
to help develop a draft Green Building (�rdinance, using the Phase II recornmendations �
as a framework with a maximum budge� of $25,000 (see Attachments 2&3 - City Council �
, minutes and staff report). �
The goal of developing a Green Buildi:lg Ordinance was initiated through the City's
� participation �and support of the Sani a Clara County Cities Association Board of ;
! Director's "Phase II recommendations (see Attachment 4) adopted in June 2009. The
Phase II recommendations are criteri � and thresholds for new construction and
renovation/remodeling projects, that �►im to support the use of healthy building `
materials/construction methods, � promc te energy, water and resource efficiency and
conservation by adherence to LEED (Le��dership in Energy and Environmental Design)
' and GPR (Green Point Rated) rating systE�ms.
DISCUSSION
Cornmunity Outreach ,
In May 2010, citywide notices were mailE�d out seeking interested parties to participate in ;
the Green Building Ordinance Focus Gr �ups. Green building consultant Global Green, �
,:-24 `
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Page 2
� was also retained by the City to assist with the focus group facilitation and preparation of
the draft ordinance.
,
On june 7, 2010, the first Green Building �rdinance Focus Group meeting was held at De
. Anza College's LEED Platinum Kirsch c �enter. The meeting was attended by over 60 '
participants. The meeting started wit�� a tour of the Kirsch Center, followed by a
presentation by Walker Wells of Global � Green on the purpose and concepts of green �
building and the Phase II recommendatic�ns. The par�icipants had opportunities to break
'• into small groups to discuss and provide input on elements of green building ordinances,
I including threshold levels, rating stan�iards and certification levels, incentives and
implementation strategies.
� As a result of participants' comments 1 o better understand the rating systems under
consideration, the Planning Commissior� held an educational workshop at its July 13,
2010 meeting. The workshop included a presentation by Shiloh Ballard of Silicon Valley
Leadership Group who provided an overview of LEED, GPR and the Phase II
' recommendations. Additionally, David Kaneda, Cupertino Planning Commissioner,
provided an overview of the upcoming r�ew Cal Green Building Codes that wi11 become
effective on January 1, 2011.
On July 29, 2010, a second Green Build:ng Focus Group meeting was held, where the
Green Building Ordinance core elements were presented anc� discussed. A summary of
the comments and suggestions providec. by residents, businesses and the development
� community at the focus group meetings i;; attached in this report (see Attachments 5& 6). �
�
,
Draft Green Building Ordinance �
The draft Green Building Ordinance �n�as prepared primarily by using the Phase II
' framework with modifications and adjushnents to meet the specific goals and objectives
of the City of Cupertino. The draft ordin�ince also attempts to incorporate and respond to
key comments and suggestions providE d by the focus group participants. The draft
ordinance will be a new chapter of the :�oning Ordinance, and will be incorporated as
Chapter 19.78 of the Cupertino Municipa] Code.
: Key components of the draft ordinance ai e summarized as follows:
"Scope and Applicability" �
�
The proposed draft Green Building Ordinance will apply only to private development
projects, including new construction and renovation/remodeling projects that require
; building permits and meet the criteria i n the table of the Requirements section of the
ordinance.
� Public (city-owned) buildings have been �xcluded from the draft ordinance requirements �
� since staff has found that most cities that address green building requirements for public i
buildings do so either through a separatE� policy or ordinance. Additionally, aIl of the �
cities within Santa �Clara County, i ncluding Cupertino, adopted the Phase I '
�'-25 .
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Page 3
recommendations from the Santa Clara County Cities Association that requires new
� public buildings over 5,000 square feet � e LEED Silver certified in order to demonstrate
and exemplify that such standards are ac hievable. Although the City Council supported
' the Phase I recommendations, no public buildings have been constructed in the City of
Cupertino since the adoption of the PhasE� I recommendations.
� Staff recommends that the new ordinance become effective six (6) months from the date �
of its adoption. Any projects in which bt.ilding permit applications have been submitted
� for development within this grace period are not subject to the new green building
� requirements, unless otherwise conditioiied by a development permit. The grace period
wili provide time to disseminate inforr.lation about the ordinance through the City's
website, handouts as residents and businesses plan their developrnent projects. Please
note that a dernolition permit does not qualify as a building permit application for
development, and would not exempt a stibsequent building project from this ordinance if
submitted after adoption of the ordinar�ce. The ordinance also clarifies that planning
entitlements alone, obtained prior to thE� effective date of the ordinance do not exempt
such projects fr.om the ordinance requirernents.
❖ Option regarding previous planning approvals
The Planning Commission may consicier whether to exclude previously approved
planning projects from this ordinance. These projects have received planning
entitlements (some with phased develo pment schemes) but may not submit building �
permit applications prior to the effective date of the ordinance. A reason for excluding
such projects may be that the applicants had not built in the new requirements into their
proforma. Also, since projects are requixed to vest their permit within two years of their
permit approval (unless the Council atithorized longer terms for a Use Permit - for �
; example, Main Street and the Oaks proje�t), staff does not believe that this will not affect
the intent of the ordinance in the long tE rm. However, in order to prevent people from
"vesting" their permit by building only one building in a large project and then
submitting building permits over an extended period of time, the ordinance should allow
, projects that have already received p1a�uling approvals as of the effective date of the
� ordinance, an exemption for the duratic�n that their permit is valid. After the permit
expiration date, whether the project is extended or phased, buildings shall be required to
comply with the Green Building Ordinance.
"Reference Standards"
The draft ordinance relies primarily ori existing rating standards of LEED and GPR
consistent with the Phase II recommend�.tions. However, the draft ordinance recognizes
, the need and provides the ability for alternative reference standards (e.g. Living Building
Challenge) to be applied in cases where �n applicant may propose to meet or exceed the
ordinance requirements through an alterriate rating system with a forrnalized
certification process and third party verif ication.
j
�
;:-26
MCA-2010-04 Green Building Ordinance October 12, 2010
Pa�e 4
"Re�uirements"
The threshold criteria under which projec ts are subject to the draft ordinance are outlined
in the Table 19.78.050 of the draft ordinan ce. While the criteria are mostly consistent with
the Phase II recommendations, staff is re �ommending some changes to respond to focus �
group comments.
Comparison Table of Phase II and C'upertino Draft Green Building Ordinance
New Construction and Addition/Renovation
Cupertino Draft Green Bi dlding Ordinance Phase II Recommendations
Minimum Re uirements
Residential - New Construction Single-Family & Mulii-Fa mily < 5 homes: Single-Family (SFR) & Multi-Family (MFR)
(Single Family & Multi-Family) < 9 homes:
GPR min. 75 pts or LEED Certified
Formal Certification or O ption 2 � GPR Rated (50 pts min.) or LEED Certified
SFR & MFR Z 9 homes:
SFR & MFR � 5 homes:
GPR Rated or LEED Silver
GPR min.100 pts or LEE] � Silver
Formal Certification or Option 2
Residential - Renovation/Addition Single-Family z 50� total existing floor area: SFR<$100K permit valuation; or <500 sf
(Single-Family & Multi-Family) add'n; or FAR increase<50%: ;
Cal Green Mandatory (fo r new portions �
o � y � BIG Elements checklist or LEED checklist I
SF $100K-$200K permit valuation; or 500- ;
Multiple-Family (minor r�novation): 1,000 sf add'n:
Cal Green Mandatory (as applicable to BIG Elements 25-49 pts, or LEED Certified
scope) SFR $200K+ pernut valuation; or 1,000 sf
add'n; or FAR increase of 50°k:
Multi-Family (major ren�roation) - over 50%a
tofial existing floor area, f nd at least 25,000 sf GPR Rated (min. 50 pts.) or LEED Certified
of addition/renovation, and replacement or Small MFR (TBD):
alteration of 3 of the 4 following systems:
HVAC, building enveloF e, hot water system GPR checklist or applicable LEED checklist
or lighting system: Large MFR (TBD):
LEED Certified GPR 50 pts. or applicable LEED Certified �
� Formal Certification or O ption 2 (
Commercial - New Construction < 10,000 sf: Smali, <5,000 sf:
Cal Green Mandatory LEED checklist
Mid-size, 5,000 - 25,000 sf:
> 10,000 - 50,000 sf:
LEED Certified I
LEED Certified Large, >25,000 sf: �
Formal Certification or O ption 2
LEED Silver
>50,000 sf: '
LEED Silver
Formal Certification or O tion 2
�
L—Z7 _
i
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui lding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Pa�e 5
Commercial - Renovation/Addition Minor Renovation: Small projects:
Cal Green Mandatory � LEED Checklist i
Large w/o HVAC: 2 of 4 systems are
Major Renovation - Over 50°,6 total existing touched +> 10,000 sf +> permit valuation ;
floor area, and at 1� �ast 25,000 sf of of $1 million pemut valuation '
' addition/renovation, ar.d replacement or
alteration of 3 of the 4 following systems: LEED Certified w/ o prerequisites
i HVAC, building envelo� e, hot water system Large w/HVAC: 2 of 4 systems are touched,
, or lighting system: one being HVAC +> 10,000 sf +>$1 million
i
i permit valuation:
LEED Certified
I Formal Certification or O ption 2 LEED Certified
MixedUse For projects with both residential and non- NotAddressed �
residential components, each use shall :
comply with the mini num requirements i
stated above. �
� I
New Construction �
Residential - The reason for variations fr��m the Phase II recommendations for residential I
� is based upon comparisons with other local cities that have adopted green building
ordinances and have successfully ixr.plemented higher standards for residential '
developments (e.g. Palo Alto, Morgan Iiill, and Sunnyvale require 70 GPR points for
their residential developments)(See Att�ichment 7, Comparison Table of Other Cities'
Requirements). Additionally, staff modif:.ed fhe threshold level to delineate between less
than five homes and greater than or equal to five homes to differentiate single family and
I minor lot subdivisions (parcel maps) frc►m larger subdivision projects requiring a tract
I ma P' � �
Non-Residential - The requirements are fairly consistent with the Phase II �
recomrnendations, except for adjustmenis to make the threshold and certificatioz levels I
less stringent based upon feedback staif received from major stakeholders and focus
; g�roup participants. The requirements a]so aim to be in line with the new state "green"
building code (CALGreen). Essentially, C ALGreen has set the floor of building codes at a
higher level by requiring development ��rojects to incorporate green building practices.
CALGreen takes effect on January 1, 2011 and will require all new construction ,
(residential projects of three floors or less and all non-residential projects) to comply with '
� the code. Cupertino's draft ordinance also takes the requirements a step higher by
requiring significant single-family rf�sidential additions/renovations and minor
�additions/renovations for multiple-family and comme'rcial projects to comply with
CALGreen. Staff believes that this requir��ment is preferable for smaller projects since the
requirements are less stringent, easier tc follow and require adherence to the new code ,
only for a fixture or the portion of the building that is being modified. However, it .
should be noted that CALGreen does n�fi require energy efficiency beyond the current '
Title 24 energy requirements.
I
i
, �
�
�:-28 . '
i
�
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui (ding Ordinance October 12, 2010 �
Pa�e 6
� I
Renovations and Additions ;
i
The draft ordinance requires single-family renovations and additions that add or affect '
50% or more of the existing building flo�r area to comply with the CALGreen building !
codes for the new/renovated portions on.y. �
For Multiple-Family Residential and Non-Residential (commercial and industrial) �
renovations and additions, the threshol��s differentiate between minor renovation and
i major renovation. A major renovation is defined as a renovation or addition that affects �
� greater than 50% of the total existing flc�or area if that area is equal to or greater than
25,000 square feet, and includes replacement or alteration of at least three of the following
four systems: HVAC system, buildir�g envelope (including walls and windows),
domestic hot water system (e.g. water h�ater/boilers), and lighting. Major renovations
will require LEED certification, whi:h is fairly consistent with the Phase II �
recommendations and what some of thE other Iocal cities are requiring (e.g. Palo Alto, :
Sunnyvale, Morgan Hill)(See Attachmeitt 8, Comparison Table), except that the draft '
ordinance does not require LEED Silve� for the highest threshold of Non-Residential
renovations and additions, as some of f7te other local cities do. Staff is recommending �
that LEED Certified level for� major re=lovations based upon discussions with major �
stakeholders in the community.
, All minor renovations and additions that do not meet the threshold for major renovations � �
� are required to comply with the CALGreE�n building code.
Mixed use projects will be required to cc mply with the minimum requirements for each ;
� component type of the development. �
i
� Exemplary/Incentives
� An Exemplary Standards section has been added to provide incentives and encourage
developments to seek higher levels of cer ification than the nunimum requirements of the �
ordinance. Possible incentives that th�� City may consider granting for meeting or
exceeding Exemplary Standards have been identified, contingent upon 'availability of
i funding and City approval. These possible incentives include:
• Matching grants to off-set the cost of certification application (based on funding
� availability).
• Fee reductions for the building permit (options include 2-5%) '
• Zoning code adjustments of floor arE a ratio, or off-street parking, not to vary more
than 10% (options include 5-10%) of tr�e standards in place at the tirne of application
"Veri cation"
Staff has proposed two options for verifi�:ation to ensure that the development is carried
out to the prescribed standard.
2-29
i
I
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui.ding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Page 7
• Option 1(Formal Certification) is the verification route for projects requiring formal
' certification, and would be required c�f any new residential construction project, any
� new non-residential (commercial) co�lstruction project over 10,000 square feet, and
; major renovations for multi-fami.y residential projects and non-residential
� (commercial) projects. The formal ce� tification would also be required for exemplary �
' standard projects. This option will pr��vide the greatest degree of confidence that the �
; building has been built and is operatir.g to the required standards.
' •� Option 2(City Determination) is an alternate option to Option 1. Essentially, Option 2
� is a verification route that would o:�ly require that projects demonstrate that the
i � construction drawings are designed t�� meet the required certification level. A formal
certification process to require projects to actually achieve the required certification
level is not required. Therefore, this verification route could be handled through a
Cify determination process. No further verification is required past the building
permit stage to demonstrate that the ��equirement is met. As is the case in most cities,
the City will use a qualified consultant to ensure that building permit documents
adhere to the required standards.
• CALGreen - For projects that require adherence to CALGreen requirements, the City
will make the determination as they will with other building permits that require
adherence to CALGreen. �
�
The draft ordinance highlights the certification process in detail. �
� �
The following is a list of pros and con� that the Planning Commission may consider
: regarding verification requirements:
� - 4 - _ � _ � _ i �� ,t �"` . - - = d�"�. a � i�.�' � 3 .
:. � i s . t � z : � _ __�� : r � t ��' s . � � � � s,-�'�� �i51C�' � 7� k .
, � � ,�- �'��,.�- � � � ; � ' �fI a ���� - � :;�.:�. �r�t
s� . � . _ �.._. � � x , _. �,. � ;�-�. . :.�. �-�--, x: - � ,. s T � _ _. ..
Option 1(Formal Cert ification) O tion 2 Ci Verification)
Pros • Certification requirement ensures that Reduced cost and process
building is built as and functions as a since it does not require
"green building." � certification or a Green
Building deposit. ?
• Certification allows building owners to ;
market/lease their buildi�igs as "green �
�
buildings." �
• Allows City to track and � nonitor its
CAP (Climate Action Pro,;ram)
accurately.
;
i
, �
�
� �'-30 `
i
. �
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui Iding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Page 8
. �, ,. «�:, ,�
; � _� _
, � =y ,.� _ - - � ,�
��d � � a �� � x �
,
' �l .,t+�... � �?, z5_ _.r+�: ".,A.:�.,�'<x . _. [�..ea , �,.�....F.. __ _ :�n� ' — — �i
O tion 1(Formal Certification) u O tion 2(Ci Verification
Cons � Additional cost for certifi�:ation. • Additional deposit to cover
• Additional cost for deposit cost of the City's consultant I
requirement to verify documents at the
' building permit stage.
• Does not ensure that
building is built as, or
� functions as, a "green
building."
• Cannot be marketed/leased
to prospective owners or
. tenants as a "green
building." ,
• City cannot ensure that a i
building meets the I
requirements.
. • Does not allow the City to '
track and monitor its CAP �
, (Climate Action Program) ;
j effectivel . �
I
;
,
"Fees F� Deposits"
Option 1
A refundable Green Building Deposit :.s required for projects under Option 1 of the
Verification requirement. The intent of tlle deposit serves as an incentive to comply with
the ord.inance requirement for certificati �n, and would be paid by the applicant prior to I
' issuance of a building permit for the projrct.
Note: The suggested deposit is $2/sq. ft. with a minimum of $3,500 and maximum of $5,000 for
each single family residential building, min'mum of $40,000 and maximum of $55,000 for each
� multiple fa.mily residential building, and mi�cimum of $70,000 and maximum of $150,000 for each
non-residential building.
f These minimum deposit amounts are based ��n typical costs to cerhfy these iypes of projects. The
! maximum deposit amounts are based on th�� maximum costs typical for a project type. Keeping
deposit amounts in line �vith typical certtfi�:ation costs will encourage people to follow through
� with their certification and not make forfeiting.the deposit amount a more attractive alternafive.
. ,
� I
�
;�_g � •
MCA-2010-04 Green Bu:lding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Page 9
'FT ical Green B�uldin Certification Costs
Green Point Rated LEED for Homes LEED BD&C
1 Sin le Famil $3,800 $5,000
Multi-Famil $40,380 $54,700 I
Office 20,000 s . ft. $71,650
Office 50,000 s . ft. $97,650
*Based on data from Build i t Green, US Green Building Council, �
Davis Energy Group, � topWaste.org, and Giobal Green.
i
i
! Option 2
i
� � For Option 2, a deposit is required to be ��aid at the time of building permit application to
cover the cost of reviewing verification rE quirements. �
The City will hire a consultant to review the plans to verify that the building permit
documents meet the required certificatio�i level for a project. It is estimated that a typical
review for most projects will require 6-10 hours of consultant time with an associated cost
of approximately $900 - $1,500.
� "Exceptions"
The draft ordinance allows for property c>wners to request exceptions from the ordinance
requirements for historic sites and projects that may include atypical energy-related
� design requirements. The exceptions ma�� vary from the ordinance requirements itself, or
a particular prerequisite only for a speciiic rating system that has been determined to be
infeasible for the project. In cases where the exception is requested only for a particular
prerequisite, all ofher prerequisites ar d minimum point requirements will still be j
� required to be met.
� Exceptions may be approved if the deci:�ion-making authority for the project makes the
following findings: '
The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's ordinances and meets
one or more of the criteria described belo �v:
a. It is a hardship or is infeasible for the applicant to fully meet the requirements of this ,
Ordinance due to a conflict with the compatibility of the green building rating system
with other City goals, such as those requiring historic preservation. .
b. The exception is requested is the mir.imum required and alI required green building ;
� measures are otherwise incorporated into the development project.
�
; LEED EBOM (LEED for Existing Buildings � Operations and Maintenance)
LEED EBOM is a certification project ty pe that is based upon the actual total building �
� operating performance, instead of des� gn expectations, to maximize the operational �
efficiency and minimize the environmeni al impacts for the sustainable ongoing operation
of a building. LEED EBOM is based xpon 100% of the floor area of the building.
i
I
�-32
MCA-2010-04 Green Bui(ding Ordinance October 12, 2010
Page 10
Essentially, a building must be in operati��n for at least one year for a performance period
before certification application and certi4ication is based upon 100% of the floor area of
the building.
Subsequent additions/renovations may occur in a LEED EBOM certified building (in
other words, the building may rei ain its LEED EBOM certification) if the `
addition/renovation complies with improvements perrnitted by the LEED EBOM �
requirements. Staff recognizes that, in such cases, the applicant may apply for an
! alternative standard since such improvements would still retain the building's
certification.
' Environmental Consideration
The draft Green Building Ordinance is considered categorically exempt per Section 15308 �
Class 8(Actions by Regulatory Agenci es for Protection of the Environment) of the �
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no further environmental
review is necessary to adopt this ordinanc�e.
Prepared by Aki Honda Snelling, AICP, Senior Planner �
I
Reviewed�by: Approved by: �
�
i
i
% '
i
hao ivastava '
City Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 Model Ordina::�ce �
Attachment 2 January 19, 20:10 City Council minutes
Attachment 3 January 19, 20'LO report
� Attachment 4 Phase II recommendations '
Attachment 5 June 7, 2010 G reen Building Ordinance Focus Group
meeting comrr�ents ,.
Attachment 6 july 29, 2010 (�reen Building Ordinance Focus Group
meeting comtr�ents �
Attachment 7 Comparison T�ble of other cities for New Construction �
Attachment 8 Comparison T�ble of other cities for Renovations/Additions I
Attachment 9 Cal Green Des �ription �
Attachment 10 Comparison o:= CALGreen, LEED and GPR
G: `Pla�ming,PDREPORT`pcMCA reports� 2010�MCA-2010-09 .doc
_ . . � . 2-33 .
•
o viE�w e
. th
en i re c o er
a reoran
a ac men s
�
ea se see e
. , . .
annin .ommission
en a �ac e or
c o er
�
e rn
Attachment 3
In an effort to provide more information on LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations and Maintenance
(EBOM), the following is a description of the ratin; system, in what scenarios it is applicable, and how
stringent it is as compared to LEED for Commerci 31 Interiors (CI) in terms of two Tenant Improvement
scenarios.
LEED EBOM was designed to implement ongoing �;ustainable practices throughout the buildings
operational life-cycle. The most notable difference in LEED EBOM as compared to the other rating
systems is the processes of recertification. Recert ification can happen as often as every year, but must
be completed every five years. This process ensu �es that the building continually address building
operations, processes, systems upgrades, minor s�ace- use changes, and minor facility alterations or
additions
LEED EBOM is applicable to buildings new to LEEC certification as well as buildings previously certified
under LEED for New Construction, LEED for Schools, or LEED for Core & Shell. The following building
types are applicable under the rating system: office, retail and services establishments, institutional
building, and residential buildings of four or more habitable stories. It is a whole-building rating system
where individual tenant spaces are not eligible.
In comparing LEED EBOM to LEED CI, the fundamf�ntal difference is that LEED EBOM requires an
inventory of the whole building regardless of the �roject scope in order to assess and improve the
performance while LEED CI is contingent on the p•oject scope of work. The following two scenarios
outline this fundamental difference and how it afi�ects the level of stringency of LEED EBOM as
compared to LEED CI.
Scenario one is a TI project with a scope of work that does not address any of the energy systems and
does not have any indoor plumbing fixtures or fitiings within the tenant space. LEED CI would not
require any improvements to the existing energy �r water use since the systems are not within the
project scope and therefore not applicable to the requirement. The mechanical system requirements
under CI are applicable and must meet the minimum ventilation requirements. LEED EBOM, however,
will require an inventory and adjustment to all th�� systems since they are within the building. Under
this scenario LEED EBOM is more stringent becau�;e all the systems within the building are being
evaluated, modified and improved to the highest relevant standard required. Scenario two is a TI
project where the scope of work does include the energy and water systems. In this scenario, LEED CI is
more stringent because energy and mechanical s��stem needs to be consistent with or better than new
construction standards, while water usage needs to be 20�o better than a baseline case. Similar to
scenario one, LEED EBOM requires that buildings Function to the best of their existing capacity.
Overall, LEED EBOM is more comprehensive in its approach to sustainability and in some scenarios can
be more stringent in terms of ineeting LEED requirements. It can be considered equally sufficient to
other Rating Systems and a viable approach to su �tainably within the Green Building Ordinance in that
operations and maintenance is often more costly and harmful to the environment than new
construction.
.,
�.- 4
Attachment 4
COMPARISON TABLE OF CITIES W/SQUARE FOOTAGE THRESHOLDS FOR
RESIDENTIAL (MORGAN F[ILL, PALO ALTO, SUNNYVALE)
City Single-Family Multip le-Family - Single-Family — Multi-Family -
Residential, New New Construction Renovations Renovations
Construction
Morgan Hill 5 2,000 sf per unit 5 2,000 sf per unit Addition >_ 250 sf Addition >_ 250 sf
or renovation or renovation
70 GPR pts. 70 GPI. pts. permit valuation ? permit valuation >_
or LEED certified or LEE D certified $100K: $100K:
> 2,000 sf per unit > 2,000 sf per unit
BIG Existing BIG Existing
70 GPR + 1 pt per 70 GP�. + 1 pt per homes checklist homes checklist
each additiona170 each aclditiona170 m�• 25 pts. min. 25 pts.
sf (150 pt. sf (150 pt. Addition >_ 700 sf Addition >_ 700 sf
maximum) or maxim um) or or renovation or renovation
LEED Silver LEED ��ilver permit valuation >_ permit valuation z
$250K: $250K:
BIG Existing BIG Existing
homes checklist homes checklist
min. 50 pts min. 50 pts
Permit valuation >_ Permit valuation >_
$100,000 $100,000
25 pts. of BIG 25 pts. of BIG
checklist checklist
Permit valuation >_ Permit valuation z
$250,000 $250,000
50 pts. BIG 50 pts. BIG
checklist checklist
Palo Alto SFR >_ 1,250 sf: MFR >_ ;� units: SFR addition or MFR renovations or
rebuild >_ 1,250 sf: alterations z 50% of
70 pts. GPR + 1 pt. GPR ''0 pts. & existing unit sf and
for each 70 sf. over exceed title 24, Part Choose GPR Rated include replacement
2,550 sf & exceed 6 by 15°� (min. 50 pts.) or CA or alteration f at least
Title 24, Part 6 by Energy Code T-24, 2 of the 4 systems
15% MFR >_ : 0 units: Part 6 and HERS II (HVAC, building
Existing home envelope, hot water
GPR :'0 pts. & renovations, rebuilds system, lighting
Comple:e LEED-ND and/or additions system):
(Neightorhood totaling z 250 sf and
Develo� ment) <1,250 sf and >_ GPR 50 pts. min. &
checklis t& exceed $100K: exceed Title 24, Part
Title 29, Part 6 by 6 by 15%
15% GPR Checklist and MFR renovations,
HERS II additions and/or
rebuilds to
individual units >_
250 sf and valuation
z $100K in a single
unit:
GPR Checklist, HERS
II
�-35
Sunnyvale SFR S 1,500 sf: MFR < 3 dwelling >$100K construction >$250K construction
units: value valuation:
GPR checklist (no N/A
min. pts. required) �R >_ 3 dwelling GPR Checklist (no GPR Checklist (no
SFR > 1,500 sf: ��; minimum pts. minimum pts.
GPR 70 pts. required) required)
GPR 70 pts.
** Palo Alto's threshold of 2,550 square feet is based upon the allowable FAR for a 6,000 square
foot lot (standard size lot) in Palo Alto. The a<lditional point for every 70 SF above this threshold
was to proportionally raise the bar as homes g�t larger to achieve certain points for a certain size
home (e.g. 90 points for a 4,000 SF home or 100 points for a 4,600 SF home)
�'-36
Attachment 5
N
I
C,�
�
Date: 10/14/2010
New Construction more than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
10070054 O APPLE INC 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1A2 33,084 09/16/2010
33084
08020156 C TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 1 BOFF 100,000 05/16/2008 01/29/2009
100000
08090060 C APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 1GENCOM 71,169 10/31/2008 08/28/2009
09100078 E CITY OF CUPERTINO 10486 STERLING BLVD 26,010 11/16/2009 05/19/2010
97179
09050013 O CUPERTINO PROPERTY DVLPti 10900 N WOLFE RD 1SHELLBLDG 279,567 08/05/2009
279567
06120042 E PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD #10 COMML-NEW 25,998 11/03/2008
05020059 C SILVERSTONE S DE ANZA R2 120,037 05/10/2005
05060075 C LANDMARK PROPERTY MANAG 10123 N WOLFE RD 120,000 08/17/2005 03/13/2007
05080165 C PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 25,998 01l20/2006 04/30/2008
05100195 C LANDMARK PROPERTIES MGM' 10123 N WOLFE RD # 2030 93,332 03/15/2006 03/13/2007
05120104 C LANDMARK PROPERTIES MGM' 10123 N WOLFE RD # 2030 60,750 05/04/2006
06020008 E WHOLE FOODS INC 20955 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 75,494 07/06/2006
06020109 E LANDMARK PROPERTIES MGM' 10123 N WOLFE RD # NPS3 229,839 08/09/2006
06030076 E LANDMARK-VALLCO 10123 N WOLFE RD # EPS4 241,443 10/06/2006 04/09/2008
,
Page 1
Date: 10l14/2010
New Construction more than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
,..
.
w
�
V 1 V/ UV i/ � li �nllYlt' 1 VIV f1V 1 CL/l'[CJ 1 f1UR/11V 1� 1 VVJV J UC /11VL11 DLV U
01040110 C CUPERTINO CITY CENTER ASS 10050 S DE ANZA BLVD
07020163 C PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
0 28 I C IEVERSHINE VI & ANNIE CHAN I19620 STEVENS CR EK BLVD
LU0�0:1V �U�1/ IV/LVV!
204,224 04/10/2007
25,998 04/30/2007
58,390 05/�
34,046 01/03/2008
3605736
..�.�{�-
_ �
,
2,70�f,roloa
Page 2
Date: 10/14/2010
New Construction less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
08050172 C FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 10505 MILLER AVE 1GENCOM... 20,100 09/12/2008 11/19/2008
A 1
I
w
co
080301651 O IMARCI PROPERTIES LLC �10056 ORANGE AVE BLDG A
���7~.'
1,991 �09/05/2008
2399
�
05020091 I C ITHE FORUM RANCHO SAN ANTI23500 CRISTO REY DR I COMML-NEW I 2,663 I04/18/2005 I11/07/2005
04090102 C CUPERTINO HOUSING PARTINE 19501 STEVENS CREEK BLVD # B 3,868 04/20/2005 05/06/2008
04090105 E CUPERTINO HOUSING PARTINE 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD # A 2,576 04/20/2005
05070074 C SILVERSTONE S DE ANZA R2 19,375 08/29/2005 02/15/2007
05080164 E PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 20128 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2,388 01/20/2006
05030230 C GREGG C BUNKER 1375 S DE ANZA BLVD 9,672 02/23/2006 05/09/2008
06020071 E BUNKER GREGG C 1375 S DE ANZA BLVD 1,825 02/23/Z006
04050173 E MENLO EQUITIES 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD # A 2,506 02/14/2005
06010127 E THOMAS E HARRIGNTON 22350 HOMESTEAD RD 1,774 03/17/2006
05110004 C RANDY YIN 10038 ORANGE AVE 1,705 05/04/2006
05110003 C SAM AND DIANA HU 10026 ORANGE AVE 1,932 05/04/2006
06050044 E CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN 15621 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
06100104 C HEWLETT-PACKARD 19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE
06120167 C SILVERSTONE S DE ANZA R2
6,074 10/26/2006
1,859 12/06/2006
19,375 12/22/2006
Page 2
' Date: 10/14/2010
� New Construction less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
07120258 C SCS ADVISORS, SEMI SALMI 10050 S DE ANZA BLVD 1A3 150 05/06/2008 05/08/2009
08070076 O UNION CHURCH OF CUPERTIN� 20900 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 5,000 07/01/2009
5150
09060052 O 10212 N DE ANZA LLC 10212 N DE ANZA BLVD 166NK 1,999 11/02/2009
1999
� 09080096 O ATAM SANDHU 1699 S DE ANZA BLVD 1 BOFF 947 04/22/2010
..,
08100189 C DR ROBERT CHEN 20510 TOWN CENTER LN 2,130 12/23/2008 05/04/2009
. _ _--- ----_
_ _ --._ _ - -
� 3077
�
0
09010098 C APPLE INC 2 INFINITE L:OOP . 1GENCOM 10 01/22/2009 03/02/2009
09010131 C AVERY ET AL 10100 MARY AVE 1,600 01/30/2009 07/23/2009
09020017 C APPLE INC 10300 N TANTAU AVE 363 02/03/2009 03/23/2009
09030076 C APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE 12 03/19/2009 04/23/2009
09010080 C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD 4,044 03/26/2009 04/23/2009
09030063 C VALLCO MALL 10123 N WOLFE RD #1095 258 04/09/2009 07/08/2010
08060234 E COATES & SOWARDS 20085 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 13,500 06/26/2008 06/21/2009
08060018 C KCR DEVELOPMENT 19750 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 863 07/07/2008 11/13/2008
08070133 O MATTIESON REALIY SERVICE:20863 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 6,000 07/18/2008
10030019 C TANTAU INVESTMENT, LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 67 05/05/2010 07/12/2010
10070005 O APPLE INC 10300 BUBB RD 23 08/26/2010
10070048 O KCR DEVELOPMENT 19648 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 400 10/05/2010
08040194 C SHELL OIL CO U S 20999 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 16 09/10/2008 10/17/2008
Page 1
Date: 10/14/2010
New Construction less than 25,000
r.,
�
�
�
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
06120166 C SILVERSTONE S DE ANZA R2 �OMML-NEVN.. 19,375 01/19/2007
07010104 C BUNKER GREGG C 1375 S DE ANZA BLVD 1,825 02/07/2007
07010191 C TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 490 04/09/2007 09/12/2007
07040148 C NEW LIFE CHURCH OF NAZARE20900 MC CLELLAN RD 3,148 07/11/2007 12/17/2007
07040240 C UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY 240 08/22/2007 12/13/2007
07090069 C CITY OF CUPERTINO 22221 MCCLELLAN RD 1,600 09/11/2007 06/18/2008
05040023 E THE FORUM AT RANCHO SAN f 23500 CRISTO REY DR. 21,30d 11/05/2007
07020114 O MICHAEL SHAKERI 21767 GRANADA AVE (BLDG 2D) 557 03/11/2008
07020115 O MICHAEL SHAKERI 21757 GRANADA AVE (BLDG 2E) 525 03/11/2008
14����
1 � (�� 2 5
Page 3
Attachment 6
Date: 10l14/2010
.�
�
N
� TIs over 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Foo#age Date Date
00271 C ISYMANTEC
08100111
08110058
09050015
09020016
08060127
07120018
07120020
10060004
�8090077
10050098
D9090058
D9060070
D9060071
D9060024
D9060101
10010120
09120135
09120094
10050168
E
E
C
C
E
C
C
C
�
C
O
C
O
O
C
C
C
O
C
0
C
1 A TI
1 B TI
27,000 �01/0712008 �01/15I2008
27000
71,169 12/18/2008 10/29/2009
30,000 03/24/2009 11/06/2009
38,811 06/11/2009 08/26/2009
100,084 03/18/2009 05/13/2009
30,060 08/20/2008 10/14/2009
58,900 01/22/2008 07/17/2008
44,524 01/22/2008 07/17/2008
34,046 05/29/2008
101, 080 07/22/2010
55,280 10/30/2008 11 / 13/2008
52,451 0$/03/2010
105,227 01/27/2010 06/02/2010
103,690 09/28/2009
136,23010/29/2009 ,
50,273 06/19/2009 01/19/2010
34, 330 10/29/2009 12/08/2009
46,565 03/02/2010 07/13/2010
33,625 02/17/2010
56,266 OZ/02/2010 05/11/2010
97,272 07/08/2010
60, 938 10/02/2008 12/09/2008
10201 TORRE AVE
APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE
APPLE INC 10201 N DE ANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 18880 HOMESTEAD RD
APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE BLDG 3A
APPLE WC 10300 N TANTAU AVE
APPLE INC 10400 N TANTAU AVE #TA02
EVERSHINE VI 8� ANNIE CHAN 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
APPLE INC 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
APPLE INC. 20705 VALLEY GREEN DR
4 CORNER PROPERTIES 10101 N DE ANZA BLVD
APPLE INC 10201 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1-3
APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG A
APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG C
APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 2
APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG A�
TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE 5TE 200
ECI TWO RESULTS LLC 6 RESULTS WAY _
MISSION WEST 20705 VALLEY GREEN DR FLR 1& 2
APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE FLR 1-3 �
SAND HILL PROPERTY CO 10495 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1-3
Page 1
r.,
I
�
w
Date: 10/14/2010
Tis over 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address
Number
�
07030006 C I STAR REAL ESTATE 18880 HOMESTEAD RD
07020085 C HUNTER PROPERTIES TORRE AVFJTOWN CTR
07090064 C APPLE INC 19191 VALLCO PARKWAY CAC-04
04080255 E HUNTER PROPERTIES TORRE AVE/TOWN CTR
U411UU4ti l: HF'F'Lt INI: "IU431 N Ut HNLH IiLVU
05010056 E APPLE INC 10355 N DE ANZA BLVD # 6)
05010092 C KAISER PERMANENTE 19000 HOMESTEAD RD
0�01011U C CUPERTINO CITY CENTER AS:20300 STEVENS CRK
05030110 C APPLE INC 10725 N DE ANZA BLVD
05030165 C AMES AVENUE ASSOCIATES 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE
05080124 C TARGET CORP 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
05110089 C LANDMARK PROP. 10123 N WOLFE RD # 3000
05110117 C APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE
06030175 C LANDMARK PROPERTY MANA(10123 N WOLFE RD # 3000
06060091 C SAND HILL PROPERTIES 10100 N TANTAU AVE
06060218 C APPLE INC 10351 BUBB RD
06070123 C LANDMARK PROP. 10123 N WOLFE RD # 2030
06070129 C TARGET CORP 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
106080090 E VALLCO/LANDMARK 10123 N WOLFE RD #30 (STRIKE)
Page 2
Permit Square Issue Close
Type Footage Date Date
1340821
25127
COMML-TI 60,000 05/03/2007 02/21/2008
120,000 02/27/2007
36,685 12/03/2007 01/16/2008
120,000 03/14/2005
45,/tStS UL/15/LUUb
62,130 01 /27/2005
48,556 04/13/2005 12/08/2005
27,737 03/08/2005 06/16/2005
40,000 04/05/2005 01/10/2006
25,222 04/25/2005 05/24/2005
119,926 02/03/2006 02/12/2007
93,332 09/05/2006 07/20/2010
29,376 03/20/2006 07/27/2006
93,332 09/06/2006 07/15/2010
65,300 11/01/2006 08/15/2007
27,000 09/28/2006
93,332 08/08/2006
119,926 09/05/2006
38,300 01/30/2007
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs over 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name
Number
06080230 E APPLE INC
06080248 C TARGET CORP
06100028 C LANDMARK PROPERTY
06120017 C VALLCO/LANDMARK
07040092 C MISSION WEST PROP
07010075 C HUNTER PROPERTIES
Location Address
10351 BUBB RD
20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10123 N WOLFE RD
10123 N WOLFE RD
10460 BUBB RD
TORRE A�/E/TOWN CTR
Permit Square Issue
Type Footage Date
COMML-Ti... 27,D00 08/28/2006
119,926 09/25/2006
93,332 02/13/2007
• 38,300 12/06/2006
30,668 06/06/2007
120,000 01/26/2007
1695168
Close
Date
'/30/2007
�, � �� ?L� ,.. •� _ �
�� � .� f U�rrl��,� I
�
-P 3,cn62989
Page 3
��
I
�
�
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit � Status I Owner Name
Number
32
08040121
09010081
09030065
nRn7nna�
10070081
09100142
09070142
10020045
10010041
09010083
09080108
09100049
10030172
10070156
10070172
Location Address
E YU-MEE JANG,JAEIN JANG,SUL 20916 HOMESTEAD RD
C ST JOSEPH PARISH CUPERTIN� 10110 N DE ANZA BLVD
C COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 10605 N WOLFE RD
E VALLCO SHOPPING CENTER 10343 N WOLFE RD
C SYMANTEC CORPORATION 10200 S DE ANZA BLVD
C VERIGY 10100 N TANTAU AVE FLR 1
C HEWLETT PACKARD (TRAININC 10955 N TANTAU AVE BLDG 45
C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD BLDG 1
C APPLE INC 4 INFINITE LOOP FLR1L4
(: APPI F IPIr 1f1��,�, N f1F AN7A RI \/fl
O CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD S
C APPLE INC 4 INFINITE LOOP
O APPLE INC 19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG B
C APPLE INC 3 INFINITE LOOP
C APPLE INC 10495 BANDLEY DR
C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD BLDG 2A
C' DAVE OMARA 10630 S DE ANZA BLVD
C JASON KUNG 20570 TOWN CENTER LN
C CEC ENTERTAINMENT INC 19805 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
O BYER PROPERTIES - 10650 S DE ANZA BLVD
O UNITED POLARIS LLC/OLIVIA J� 19062 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
Permit
Type
1 A TI
Square Issue Ciose
Footage Date Date
840 08/29/2008 03/01/2009
282 10/01/2009 06/1712010
3,730 11/20/2009 05/05/2010
9,194 07/09/2009 01/13/2010
1,620 07/20/2009 09/01/2009
1,800 04/22/2008 02/09/2009
180 04/16/2008 07/24/2008
6, 059 07/01 /2009 01 /27/2010
2,644 05/27/2009 06/14/2010
� nRi�ai�nnR nqmRi�nn�
100 08/24/2010
1,676 10/22/2009 08/03/2010
23,000 11 /09/2009
640 03/17/2010 �3/26/2010
5,000 01/11/2010
2,577 07/01/2009 01/27/2010
5,721 10/21/2009
1, 097 10/06/2009 01 /11 /2010
14,652 04/09/2010 05/11/2010
3,610 09/29/2010
4,210 09/2812010
Page 1
i
�,
�
rn
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
08090007
10030027
08010037
10030165
10070080
10070119
10040073
07100194
10050161
no��nn�n
10020135
10040029
10030127
10010075
10010077
10010078
09090175
09070129
09110101
10020100
10010073
09060005
09060D54
09040123
08100172
C
C
C
C
O
O
O
E
C
�
O
C
C
C
O
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
O
C
C
LOUIS CHIARAMONTE JR 10123 N WOLFE RD #FC9
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPAN 11111 N WOLFE RD STE C
APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE SHOOT 1,2,
BYER PROPERTIES 10580 S DE ANZA BLVD
CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
THOMAS E HARRINGTON TRU� 22352 HOMESTEAD RD
DENNIS S CHEN, DDS 10430 S DE ANZA BLVD STE 185
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST 19920 OLIVEWOOD ST
BAY 18 LLC C/O OLIVIA JANG 20956 HOMESTEAD RD STE H
1'1D I Iwl � 4l�AQl� C 1'1C AA17A �1 \/r1 CTC 7A/1
v� v ✓ r� � �� �u � u� � v v � � �v �
CUPERTINO CITY CENTER BLD 20400 STEVENS CREEK STE 370,
APPLE INC. 10400 RIDGEVIEW CT
MI-HYE CHOI 19110 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
LAB 126 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD FLi
LAB 126 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
LAB 126 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
LAB 126 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
JOYCE SHEU 19068 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
APPLE INC 10300 N TANTAU AVE FLR 1
APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE FLR 2
APPLE INC . 2 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2
DERRICK KOO 20568 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10212 N DE ANZA LLC 10212 N DE ANZA BLVD
MARK OSBORN 21710 STEVENS CREEK BLVD #1�
APPLE INC 10300 N TANTAU AVE
1 B TI 593 12/04/2008 03/20/2009
162 05/24/2010 06/16l201 U
12,730 02/29/2008 10/20/2008
960 04/09/2010 06/25/2010
6,400 07/27/2010
990 10/12/2010
1,452 05/14/2010
155 02/04/2008
108 06/04/2010 06/29/2010
��� �uv�iLVV� v�ivv���viv
1,000 03/23/2010
1,275 04/21/2010 06/02/2010
1,103 04/05/2010 06/29/2010
- 960 01/19/2010 02/22/2010
1,961 02/05/2010
2,790 02/05/2010 08/05/2010
12,000 12/22/2009
1,600 08/10/2009 01/13/2010
520 11/18/2009 05/26/2010
50 03/24/2010 07/08/2010
3,852 02/09/2010 06/29/2010
1,957 06/25/2009 09/24/2009
2,864 11/02/2009
800 04/22/2009 06/26/2009
609 12/10/2008 12/23/2008
Page 2
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less thaa 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number � Type Footage Date Date
�,
I
�
�
10030050 C APPLE INC 10725 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1 1 B TI... 898 03/09/2010 03/25/2010
08080142 C APPLE INC 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD 350 08/19/2008 10/16/2008
09040098 C APPLE INC 18880 HOMESTEAD RD 470 06/15/2009 07/20/2009
10040116 O APPLE INC 3 INFINITE LOOP 2,097 07/20/2010
1004011� O APPLE INC 6 INFINITE LOOP 4,046 07/20/2010
09080171 C APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 473 09/25/2009 10/14/2009
09080146 C APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1 12,540 09/30/2009 01/22/2040
09050161 E MANDAR DANGE 20640 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2,756 06/23/2009 02/11/2010
08090166 C MANDAR DANGE 20830 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 20,632 12/23/2008 04/27/2009
�nn�nnu� n ri ip�RTinin riTV rFNTFR 7(1df1f1 CT�/FNIC (:RFFK RI \/Il STF �.rifl (1R/1Q/�(11(1
09010104 C CHARLES SCHWAB & CO, INC 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE 6,628 03/20/2009 07/27/2009
08080059 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 120 08/07/2008 09/05/2008
08080064 E APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 2& 4 22,914 09/23l2008 03/24/2009
07120060 C APPLE INC 10627 BANDLEY DR 2,500 12/10/2007 01/04/2008
08120027 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 1,560 01/09/2009 03/02/2009
08120107 C APPLE INC 19310 PRUNERIDGE AVE 1,050 12/16/2008 12/23/2008
10070023 O APPLE INC 20605 LAZANEO DR 17,188 09/10/2010
10070029 C APPLE INC 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 242 08/19/2010 10/07/2010
10080064 O APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD 1,528 10/14/2010
10080065 O APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD 1,870 09/21/2010
10080067 O APPLE tNC 20650 VALLEY GREEN DR 5,180 09/10/2010
10040001 C APPLE INC 10355 N DE ANZA BLVD 1,044 04/01/2010 09/20/2010
10050131 C APPLE INC 6 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2 380 06/03/2010 08/03/2010
10070033 C APPLE INC 2 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1 2,212 09/09/2010 09/17/2010
10070015 O APPLE INC 20705 VALLEY GREEN DR FLR 1 533 08/03/2010
. Page 3
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
10070016 O APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1 1 B TI... 234 08/02/2010
10070079 C APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2 375 07/28/2010 09/14/2010
09120011 C APPLE INC 6 INFINITE L�OP 1ST FLR . 10 12/01/2009 04/30/2010
10010124 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 11,857 03/16/2010 07/08/2010
09110145 O APPLE INC 2 INFINITE LOOP 226 04/19/2010
09110146 O APPLE INC 10355 N DE ANZA BLVD 8,900 01/25/2010
09110061 C APPLE INC 20705 VALLEY GREEN DR FLR 2 3,500 12/14/2009 01/13/2010
09120137 O APPLE INC 2 INFINITE LOOP 1,990 01/28/2010
10060040 C APPLE INC ' 10495 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 3 500 06/08/2010 07/09/2010
n� 1f1f17(117d (1 APPI F I1�I('. 1 IhIFINIITF I f1f1P 1�7RR nfi/f1Al7f11l1
� 10080212 O APPLE INC 20650 VALLEY GREEN DR 4,807 10/11/2010
�
°O 08120108 C APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP 18,864 01/08/2009 OS/05/2009
10060171 O APPLE INC 10495 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 3 180 07/20/2010
10080175 O APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA FLR 2 2,878 09/20/2010
10040140 O APPLE INC 1 INFINITE LOOP FLR 2 N 4,176 04/22/2010
08030133 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 1,830 05/01/2008 07/31/2008
08030056 E APPLE INC 10400 N TANTAU AVE 1,390 04/02/2008
09090062 C APPLE INC 10351 BUBB RD 263 10/12/2009 01/04/2010
08050175 C APPLE INC 20625 LAZANEO DR 759 06/09/2008 07/30/2008
08020129 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIEW CT RC08 BSIDE 1;100 02/21/2008 04/17/2008
07120007 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 14,400 01/07/2008 02/11/2008
07120063 E APPLE INC 10495 N DE ANZA BLVD 2 01/03/2008
08060120 C APPLE INC 10435 N TANTAU AVE 5,171 07/03/2008 10/08/2008
08060122 C APPLE INC 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD 18,993 07/10/2008 09/24/2008
09060040 C APPLE INC 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1 17,681 07/02/2009 01/19/2010
Page 4
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
09010054
09010059
09060115
09050033
09050074
09060083
09050151
09060025
.._ nnnannQQ
� 09090005
�
C° 09100034
09070013
09040121
08070155
08090036
08090112
08090177
10080089
08090196
08100066
09040122
09050020
09100186
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
�
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
C
O
E
C
C
C
C
4PPLE INC
qPPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
ADDI C IAI/'`
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
RAJ MEKA
ROBERT CAMARDA
AMIR KHOJASTEH
VARDY SHTEIN
DE ANZA MEDICAL LLC
VERDE TEA ASSOCIATES
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
APPLE INC
10450 RIDGEVIEW CT FLR 2
10400 RIDGEVIEW CT
3 INFINITE LOOP
10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1
2 INFINITE LOOP
10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1-FLF
10495 N DE ANZA BLVD
10201 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1
10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1
a in��innTG � nna
10300 N TANTAU AVE FLR 1
2 INFINITE LOOP
19333 VALLCO PKWY BLDG B
10123 N WOLFE RD #FC8
20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
10123 N WOLFE RD #F C1
10215 S DE ANZA BLVD
10430 S DE ANZA BLVD STE 210
'19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD #18
2 INFINITE LOOP
10441 BANDLEY DR
4 INFINITE LOOP
10500 N DE ANZA BLVD FLR 1
1 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1
5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 3
1 B TI...
1,015 03/03/2009 03/05/2009
894 01/20/2009 02/02/2009
894 03/12/2009 04/21/2009
22,568 08/�7/2009 08/04/2010
526 06/24/2009 06/26/2009
6,772 06/22/2009 07/20/2010
695 08/26/2009 01/07/2010
3,466 05/26/2009 06/17/2009
7,228 06/22/2009 01/19/2010
� a�n (17/1R/7l1f1Q (1�/1R/7�1�11
3,760 09/23/2009 05/26/2010
1, 035 10/06/2009 10/29/2009
11,373 08/19/2009 10/11/2010
810 01/12/2010 07/12J2010
4,920 07/22/200810/16/2008
703 12/19/2008 07/22/2009
1,803 12/19/2008 05/19/2009
455 10/07/2008 11 /25/2008
1,555 02/17/2009 09/23/2009
100 09/28/2010
9,686 10/21/2008 06/10/2009
1, 300 12/19/2008 12/23/2008
1,384 05/14/2009 06/29/2009
717 05/05/2009 07/08/2009
200 12/14/2009 01/13/2010
Page 5
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
n�
I
�
0
Permit Status Owner Name
Number
10080097
08070017
09040044
10080103
10080046
09120022
09120060
10030129
f1G(ld(1f1dR
08060010
110018I
110023
07110167
08100150
10050067
09080057
09040077
08090226
09090086
09100213
09070037
08010039
Location Address
Permit
Type
1 B TI...
Square Issue Close
Foo#age Date Date
O CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C CIVIC PARK CUPERTINO, LLC 20560 TOWN CENTER LN
C CUPERTINO CITY CENTER 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE
O APPLE INC 10460 BANDLEY DR
C APPLE INC 20300 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
O APPLE INC 5 INFINITE LOOP FLR 1-4
E APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE
C APPLE INC 2 INfINiTE LOOP FLR 1
F APPI F INC: 1RRRf1 Hf1MFSTFAII RIl
C EVERTRUST BANK 20510 STEVENS CREEK BLVD ',
C CHINA TRUST BANK 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE'
C APPLE INC 10480 RIDGEVIEW CT
C APPLE INC 18880 HOMESTEAD RD
C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COfV 10600 N DE ANZA BLVD 1 ST FLR
C VICKIE PENG 10036 ORANGE AVE
C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CON 10600 N DE ANZA BLVD STE 250
O WOODMONT REAL ESTATE SEI 10201 TORRE AVE FLR 3 LOBBY
C KCR DEVELOPMENT 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C CHRIS MARCHESE 10101 BUBB RD
C DURECT CORPORATION 10260 BUBB RD
C ARC SIGHT 4 RESULTS WAY #3
C FUJIO WATANABE 10789 S BLANEY AVE
C PROMETHEUS 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE
C PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCT 20130 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
Page 6
47 08/26/2010
1,166 08/19/2008 09/22/2008
2,800 04/30/2009 06/10/2009
720 05/22/2008 03/13/2009
2,826 09/09/2010
1,323 08/05/2fl10 08/31/2010
2,029 12/03/2009
1,318 12l10/2009 06/30/2010
76 04/07/2010 05/05/2010
� (1R1 (l.r,/��/�f1f1G 11/��/�Mq
389 07/11/2008
6,596 05/19/2009 09/17/2009
974 02/01 /2010 07/08/2010
2,230 11/04/2009 01/08/2010
7,000 10/14/2008
150 12J03/2007 01 /10/2008
2,500 10/23/2008 12111 /2008
740 06/17/2010
1,476 10/02/2009 01 /05/2010
1,430 04/15/2009 05/15/2009
192 09l30/200812/03/2008
534 09/14/200910/20/2009
100 01/12/2010 03/25/2010
2,492 07/21/2009 08/19/2009
1,216 01/28/2008 02/20/2008
�
TIs less than 25,000
Date: 10/14/2010
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
190
��
i
�
�
09060039
10050151
08070165
08070143
09080242
09080243
09100076
f1Q17f111 Q
10080108I
10080109
1100861
08100130
08110014
08120101
09010108
10030008
08110061
08070067
E
C
O
O
C
O
O
O
C
f`
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
O
C
C
PINN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTI 19949 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
WAYNE GONG 19968 HOMESTEAD RD
METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. 20573 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
EMBARCADERO CAPITAL PART 6 RESULTS WAY
MITCH KANE 20725 VALLEY GREEN DR
MENLO EQUITIES 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
MENLO EQUITIES 10080 N WOLFE RD FLOOR 1-3
MENLO EQUITIES 10050 N WOLFE RD FLOOR1-3
STAR ONE CREDIT UNION 10991 N DE ANZA BLVD
TANTAI I IN\/FSTIIAFI�ITC I I(` 1flQflfl N TAPIT01_I 0\/F
'TANTAU INVESTMENTS LLC 10900 N TANTAU AVE
� CHAN 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
FRED CHAN 19620 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
JP MORGAN CHASE 10250 S DE ANZA BLVD
APPLE INC. 20705 VALLEY GREEN DR
PETER CHANG 10123 N WOLFE RD #FC12
CATHAY BANK 10480 S DE ANZA BLVD
PROMETHEUS 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STI
PHIL LAO 10123 N WOLFE RD STE FC7
MP TORRE PLAZA JV LLC 10201 TORRE AVE
SHOEFAIR PROPERTIES AND T 10139 S DE ANZA BLVD
ZHONG XIAM TAO 20530 TOWN CENTER LN
EAST WEST BANK 10001 N DE ANZA BLVD STE 100
TAKAKI BAKERY 19750 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
KIMCO REALTY CORP 10773 N WOLFE RD
1 B TI
760 09/29/2008 05/16/2009
63 04/07/2009 06/23/2009
5,020 OS/27/2009
20 05/19/2010
900 07/23/2008
1,273 08/20/2008
2,491 10/06/2009
3,527 10/06/2Q09
40 10/26/2009 01 /06/2010
7 �.R� (17/7R/7(11(1 f17/1�/7f1�f1
1,819 09/03/2008 09/03/2008
2,232 09/09/2010
1,657 09/09/2010
5,031 10/21/2009 07/28/2010
679 01 /06/2009 02/27/2009
625 10/13/2008 01/16/2009
2,524 06/18/2008 06/02/2009
3,644 09/12/2008 01/06/2009
916 11 /14/2008 05/23/2009
375 02/03/2009
489 " 01 /28/2009 01 /07/2010
1,146 04/16/2009 O6/17/2009
800 03/18/2010
426 02/09/2009 03/02/2009
290 07/10/2008 07/30/2008
Page 7
�
�
TIs less than 25,000
N
�
C3l
N
Date: 10/14/2010
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number . Type Footage Date Date
09030086 C ANNE PANOWICZ 10919 N WOLFE RD 16 TI... 1,162 04/24/2009 06/01/2009
08090108 C VALLCO MALL 10123 N WOLFE RD 1,500 10/10/2008 11/20/2008
07120083 E SHAWN TAHER 8� HENRY LAI 21267 STEVENS CREEK BLVD #31 400 02/25/2008
08040087 C JIMMY CHEN 10123 N WOLFE RD #2021 729 06/11/2008 07/30/2008
08040150 C PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT ER 18922 FORGE DR STE B 196 05/07/2008 09/11/2008
09020106 C MP TORRE PLAZA JV LLC 10201 TORRE AVE 2ND FLR 600 03/25/2009 02/26/2010
08050167 G HOMELAND MANAGEMENT GRt 21265 STEVENS CREEK BLVD #20 1,070 08/05/2008 04/14/2009
467121
IUy I IU 1�8 l.. J 1. JVJGt'f1 Vr' l�Ut'CK 1 IIVIJ Jl IU ILU IV UC NIVLII DLVU I I C 11 1 L OOU VL/ 1�lLV IU VO/J 1/LV IU 1
)70007 C LITTLE TREE MONTESSORI INC 20100 STEVENS CREEK BLVD �
)10082 C ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH 10100 N STELLING RD BLDG 2B
10126 I G IAPPLE INC
10475 BANDLEY DR #5
08040184 C WHOLE FOODS INC 20955 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10070059 O CVS PHARMACY- M DECARVAL 10455 S DE ANZA BLVD
08040179 C EVERSHINE 19750 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10050140 O MARINA FOODS 10122 BANDLEY DR STE C'
07050029 6 ARIEF PASHA 19062 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
1 H TI
1 M TI
i
5,719 08/20/2009 10/08/2009
4,893 07/01 /2009 01 /27/2010
13492
900 04/07/2009 08/26/2009
900
5,000 05/13/2008
889 10/04/2010
11,875 07/07/2008 12/16/2008
662 07/27/2010
983 06/18/2007 03/24/2010
19409
Page 8
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
07070108
07070174
07080266
07040226
07060066
05120145
05090217
06100085
06020099
�� f151�f1(l.ri1
� I05020126
cr
C+� nan�nnna
�5030166
�7050015
D7100005
D5040062
D5110136
D7050014
D6120114
D6020171
D6070186
07100042
110032
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
E
r
C
E
C
E
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
E
C
SOUTH BAY INVESTMENT GRO 19748 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CURRY HOUSE 10350 S DE ANZA BLVD
MENLO EQUITIES 19505 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
ECI TWO RESULTS, LLC8�CB Rli 2 RESULTS WAY 2ND FLOOR
VU 8� BAOTRAM TRUONG 19501 STEVENS CREEK BLVD #1
J C PENNEY PROPERTIES INC 10150 N WOLFE RD
GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY
TIANLHUI TEMPLE 7811 ORION LN
PROMETHEUS 20450 STEVENS CRK # 250
PRnMFTHFI IS �(L45(1 STFVFNS C:RK #�f)fl
TREND MICRO 10101 N DE ANZA BLVD
WAYNE GONG 19944 HOMESTEAD RD
GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY
NUTRITION RESTAURANT 10300 N TANTAU AVE
jNUTRITION RESTAURANT 10300 N TANTAU AVE
�HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19410 HOMESTEAD RD # 43
�' HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE
HEWLETf PACKARD CO 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE #44
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE
HEWLETT PACKARD CO 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE
ROCKWOOD CAPITAL, LLC 10200 N TANTAU AVE
CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPAI 10023 S DE ANZA BLVD
CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPAI 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD
GROSWENOR 2 RESULTS WAY FL 2ND
Page 9
COMML-TI
900 08/30/20U7 11/27/2007
2,933 10/05/2007 03/17/2008
2, 547 10/ 12/2007 12/13/2007
15,561 06/01/2007 08/29/2007
1,289 06/08/2007
3,400 04/05/2006
2,500 11 /04/2005 12/21 /2005
445 10/12/2006
12,501 03/06/2006
1 f1 f11 /(1�/�(1f1R (1�/�9/�f1f1R
10,893 02J1712005 08/08/2005
64 03/03/2006
2,000 03/16/2005
263 05/21/2007
50 10/10/2007
1,200 04/12/2005
300 12/21/2005 09/29/2006
676 06/20/200710/13/2007
400 01 /12/2007
306 03/28/2006 09/29/2006
300 08/30/2006
639 12/18/2007 01 /22/2009
2,097 08/06/2007 01 /31 /2008
1,306 06/29/2007 07/31/2008
422 11 /16/2005
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address . Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
N
�
�
.�
07090073 C GARY LESSING 10061 BUBB RD COMML-TI... 247 11/14/2007 06/18/2008
05010040 E GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY 21,184 02/17/2005
04080220 C PEETS COFFEE & TEA 20807 STEVENS CRK # 200 1,834 01/04/2005 04/18/2005
05010057 C BANDLEY CENTER INC 10268 BANDLEY DR 10,000 08/01/2005 03/28/2006
05050041 E DE ANZA PROPERTIES 10150 TORRE AVE 10,115 06/16/2005
05010067 C CALI FINANCIAU HAIR SALON 10475 S DE ANZA BLVD 1,237 01/11/2005 04/04/2005
04100065 C TACO DEL MAR 21267 STEVENS CRK# 320 1,378 01/04/2005 04/14/2005
04120016 E PANERA BREAD INC 20807 STEVENS CRK# 100 5,160 05/09/2005
04120009 E SUNNYVIEW LUTHERSAN HOM 22445 CUPERTINO RD 280 04/14/2005
(1d17f1f1�,� (: PR(1�AFTI-IFI IC RFA1 FCTATG 7fldflfl CTF�/F�IC (`IC RI \/1'1 1f1l1 ��RI1A n�lll�l7nn� nzl�n/7nn�
04120088 C LUCKY RESTAURANT 10271 TORRE AVE 2,020 03/14/2005 01/18/2006
05010010 C POTSTICKER RESTAURANT 19634 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2,535 08/18/2005 03/23/2006
05010066 C PROMETHEUS (2ND FL. #245) 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3,650 01/11/2005 08/24/2005
05020179 C HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANl 11000 WOLFE RD 9,611 04/15/2005
05030026 C GROSVENOR 2 RESULTS WAY 600 03/02/2005
05020170 C DOLLINGER DE ANZA ASSOC. 1601 S DE ANZA BLV # 150 5,570 04/20/2005 11/02/2005
05030013 C PET FOOD (FIVE PAW BAKERYJ 10251 S DE ANZA BLVD 2,800 03J01/2005 03/31/2005
05030016 E MARCUS & MILLCHAP 10133 S DE ANZA BLVD 1,874 04/06/2005
05030022 C RITE AID CORP. 20580 HOMESTEAD RD 3,417 06/06/2005 01/26/2006
05030102 C AARON BROTHERS 20600 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 5,862 04/04/2005 05/23/2005
05030115 C CUPERTINO FINANCIAL CENTE 10080 N WOLFE RD 7,865 04/14/2005 05/12/2005
05030130 E DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN AS:10381 DE ANZA BLVD 820 12/16/2008
05010120 C UNITED NATIONAL BANK 10001 N DE ANZA BLVD # 101 420 01/20/2005 03/23/2005
05090209 C HEWLETT-PACKARD � 10955 TANTAU AVE BLD 45 1,635 09/30/2005 12/13/2005
06040100 C EVERSHINE GROUP 19754 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1,087 12/22/2006 07/26/2007
Page 10
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
N
�
cn
cn
07070259
06010056
05070091
05040014
05110050
05110041
05120022
05110065
05110069
06020105
05070067
`�
10127
10152
10157
0
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
TIANLHUI TEMPLE 7811 ORION LN
MATTESON COMPANIES 20813 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
HEWLETT PACKARD 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE # 46
AARON BROTHERS 20600 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
BYER MARIAN AND ALLAN G 20670 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
NEW LIFE CHURCH OF NAZARE 20900 MC CLELLAN RD
MATTRSON CO. 19925 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
DOLLINGER DE ANZA ASSOCIA 1601 DE ANZA BLVD # 118
CUPERTINO FINANCE (#270) 19638 STEVENS CRK # 270
t�nl I INC,FR f)F AN7A ASS(�C:IA 1R(11 S f1F AN7A RI Vfl # �4R
KUMUD GROCERIES 10255 S DE ANZA BLVD
JAYNE HAM 23000 HOMESTEAD RD
VERITAS PROPERTY MGMT 10596 N TANTAU AVE
PACIFIC RESOURCES 10501 N TANTAU AVE
PROMETHEUS (#100) 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
MARK THOMAS 8� CO. INC. 20833 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
PROMETHEUS (#150) 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
DURECT CORPORATIVN 10260 BUBB RD
NUIMAGE FURNITURE 20149 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT 19450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
LORIS DINER RESTAURANT 19930 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
FARMERS INSURANCE 20735 STEVENS CREEK BLVD # D
DONNA COTNER, DDS 10011 N FOOTHILL BLV # 112
',PROMETHEUS (6TH FL.) 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
DR_ ALAVI 10251 TORRE AVE # 160
COMML-TI...
445 05/10/2005 10/10/2006
1,817 09/06/2007 02/15/2008
4,787 05/10/2005 09/19/2005
4,854 04/22/2005 05/23/2005
1,874 01%17/2006 03/20/2006
390 07/15/2005 08/04/2005
4,100 05/04/2005 05/23/2005
1,451 11 /09/2005 11 /18/2005
625 11 /08/2005 01 /24/2006
ri d11 1?/71/�f1f1S
2,525 01/12/2006 05/30/2006
4,782 01/03/2006 04/25/2006
14,250 04/03/2006
890 09/01/2005 03/16/2006
1,000 09/06/2005
480 09/15/2005 02/09/2006
3,000 09/06/200511/07/2005
1,000 09/21/2007 03/03/2008
9,500 03/08/2005 04/28/2005
2,705 01/26/2005 04/26/2005
6,052 03/16/2005 06/28/2005
42 06/03/2005 08/09/2005
1,402 02/02/2005 05/27/2005
3,800 03/15/2005
65 02/03/2005 03/21/2005
Page 11
� Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
N
I
G1
rn
05020080 C DR. WARREN L LEE 10251 TORRE AVE # 108 COMML-TI.._ 1,400 03/14/2005
07040087 C THE FORUM RANCHO SAN ANT 23500 CRISTO REY DR #OFFICE 496 06/21/2007 10/08/2007
05040043 C BERG 8� BERG 10460 BUBB RD 1,780 04/07/2005 05/10/2005
05060014 C DR. HENRY LIN 19028 STEVENS CREEK BLVD # D 953 08/10/2005 09/22/2005
05040055 C BERG & BERG 10460 BUBB RD 100 04/19/2005 04/29/2005
05040080 C AMES AVENUE ASSOCIATES 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE # 100 13,664 04/14/2005 06/21/2005
05040081 C BETTER HOME AND LOAN 10495 S DE ANZA BLVD 2,924 04/14/2005
05040100 C PROMETHEUS (6TH FL.) 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3,800 05/10/2005 06/10/2005
05050056 C AARON BROS 20600 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 275 05/12/2005 05/23/2005
05060076 E JC PENNEY COMPANY 1015(1 N W(�I FF Rn � F�n nst��Qnnn�
05080048 E SYMANTEC (GROUND FL.) 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3,500 08/26/2005
05080070 C IMAGINATION UNLIMITED 19110 STEVENS CREEK BLVD # C 1,000 09/06/2005 10/25/2005
05090144 C WAHOO'S FISH TACO 19626 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 2,735 12/05/2005 04/06/2006
05080066 C PROMETHEUS (#850 8TH FL.) 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 145 08/09/2005 08/31/2005
05110008 C KCR DEVELOPMENT 19638 STEVENS CRK# 220 1,434 11/01/2005
06120168 E KCR DEVELOPMENT 19628 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1,500 03/06/2007 05/31/2007
06060109 C JIM BOWLBY & SHU MEI CH. 19705 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 300 06/13/2006 08/02/2006
05090126 C DOLLINGER PROPERTIES 1601 S DE ANZA BLVD # 111 4,905 10/17l2005 12/06/2005
05090054 E DOLLINGER PROPERTIES 1601 S DE ANZA BLVD 1,838 10/19/2005
05090071 C AMES AVE ASSOCIATION 19050 PRUNERIDGE AVE # 200 1,298 09/16/2005 11/17/2005
05090108 C DOLINGER PROPERTIES 1601 DE ANZA BLVD # 230 1,475 09/15/2005 09/28/2005
06020090 C STARBUCKS COFFEE 22390 HOMESTEAD RD 1,700 06/20/2006 08/02/2006
07070171 C SYMANTEC CORPORATION 10200 S DE ANZA BLVD 1,161 07/31/2007 09/12/2007
07010181 C HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANti 19091 PRUNERIDGE AVE #46L 18,270 03/09/2007 07/25/2007
05080112 C SYMANTEC (1ST FL.) 20300 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1,169 08/22/2005 12/13/2005
Page 12
67
05
69
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type - Footage Date Date
N
, I
�
�
05080214
05100210
05110115
05030266
05030299
05120084
05120111
06060170
60141
20116
20141
;�y�
C
E
C
E
E
E
C
C
C
C
E
E
C
E
C
C
E
C
C
STATE SIDE PROPERTY (#100) 19400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
STATESIDE PROPERTIES 19400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CALI FINANCIAL 10495 S DE ANZA BLVD
PETSMART 20558 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
TREND MICRO (2ND FL.) 10101 N DE ANZA BLVD
SYMANTEC (GROUND FL.,) 20330 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
VARDY MIKE LLC 10215 S DE ANZA BLVD
DOLLINGER DE ANZA ASSOICA 1601 S DE ANZA BLVD # 250
MATTESON CO. 19925 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
ARC SIGHT 5 RESULTS WAY
VALLCO INTERNATIONAL 10123 N WOLFE RD
OLIVIA JANG 19062 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
PROMETHEUS REAL ESTATE 20400 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3
SAEED GHAZVINI
STARBUCKS
CEC ENTERTAINMENT
CHRIS CIARDELLA
PROMETHEUS REG.
CHRIS MARCHESE
10075 PASADENA AVE
20520 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
19805 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
21721 GRANADA AVE
20400 STEVENS CRK # 850
10101 BUBB RD
090163 C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CON 10600 N DE ANZA BLVD 1ST FLR
100080 C SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CON 10600 N DE ANZA BLVD
090110 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIEW CT 1ST FLR
020072 C APPLE INC 10400 RiDGE VIEW CT
COMML-TI... 3,789 06/16/2005
3,712 03/16/2005
2,850 03/23/2005 06/22/2005
20,596 07/20/2005
204 08/17/2005
10,000 09/30/2005
1,600 02/07l2006
5, $25 12/06/2005 12/20/2005
530 03/29/2005 04/11/2005
�n� n:�i:�ni�nn� n���Ri�n��
1,140 04/03/2006
6,078 03/10/2006 02/20/2010
1,500 06/28/200610/15/2007
224 01 /05/2007
1,107 08/17/2006 09/01/2006
14,652 05/31/2006 11/02/2006
1,100 05/09/2006
9,048 07/24J2006
15,620 08/04/2006 01/08/2007
7,000 01/03/2008 01/18/2008
7, 000 10/09/2007 11 /09/2007
620 09/18/2007 04/29/2008
904 03/08/2007 05/10/2007
Page 13
Date: 10/142010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
07030108
06030126
06050126
AGS98A9�
05050146
06080195
05120050
N nFn�nn��
� I06010024
� ���o����
C
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
F
E
MANDAR DANGE
ORBIT RESOURCES INC
ORBIT RESOURCES
APPLE INC
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMP
H.K. ENVISTMENTS
CEC ENTERTAINMENT
MARCHANT FAM I LY
FVFR�HINF I PV
HEWLETf PACKARD (TRAINI
10564 DE ANZA BLVD
10123 N WOLFE RD
10123 N WOLFE RD
20730 VALLEY GREEN DR
19111 PRUNERIDGE AVE
20735 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
19805 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
10300 S DE ANZA BLVD
1QR�R STFVFNS f:RK#�Rfl
10955 TANTAU AVE # 45N-L
COMML-TI._. 1,135 03/29/2005
1,042 02/08/2008
550 04/20/2007
21,680 05/23/2006
2,711 06/23/2006
991
14,652
3,778
Rd
5,117
3/2008
7/2007
'/11 /2005108/09/2005
1 /20/2006 I07/03/2007
1 /f1�,/�f1f1F
3/16/2006 I
06020024 C PROMETHEUS (#300) 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1,500 02/23/2006 03/29/2006
05020064 E APPLE INC ONE INFINITE LOOP 1,090 03/22/2005
07090062 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIEW CT 2ND FLR • 3,343 09/18/2007 04/29/2008
07090063 C APPLE INC 10450 RIDGEVIVIEW CT 1ST FLR 2,993 10/16/2007 01/08/2008
07050195 C APPLE INC 10400 RIDGE VIEW CT 905 06/18/2007 12/03/2007
05010087 C APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI DR 1,067 01/13/2005 03/22/2005
05050057 C APPLE INC 10460 BANDLEY DR 1,228 05f11/2005 08/23/2005
05060221 C APPLE INC 10381 BANDLEY DR (BLDG A) 16,438 08/11/2005 09/21/2005
05040116 E APPLE INC 20705 VALLEY GREN DR 1,500 04/19/2005
05030231 E APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 8,000 04/08/2005
05030236 C APPLE INC 20605 LAZANEO DR 14,920 04/27/2005 06/16/2005
05030203 C APPLE INC . 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD 1,148 03/22/2005 02/22/2006
05020141 C APPLE INC 20605 LAZ/�NEO DR 4,566 04/05/2005 07/18/2005
Page 14
�,
I
�
�
Date: 10/14/2010
TIs less than 25,000
Permit Status Owner Name Location Address Permit Square Issue Close
Number Type Footage Date Date
05030171 C APPLE INC 20650 VALLEY GREEN DR COMML-TI... 322 03/16/2005 07/19/2005
05120085 C APPLE INC 10101 BUBB RD 1,420 12/15/2005 03/02/2006
05100012 C APPLE INC 20525 MARIANI AVE 1,869 10/04/2005
05100040 C APPLE INC 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD 3,897 10/21/2005
05090214 G APPLE INC 10131 BUBB RD 13,540 12/08/2005 03/30/2006
05090056 C APPLE INC 10400 RIDGE VIEW CT 16,416 09/29/2005 04/13/2006
05080255 G APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVE 14,060 09/08/2005 03/17/2006
07030160 G APPLE INC 10381 BANDLEY DR 16,520 04/19/2007 09/12/2007
652492
�� 3�I1 llva�nc�
; 2-� �� 3�5�
Page 15