R-2010-21b OFFICE OF COMMUt11TY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENl1E • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT I N O (408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • planning�cupertino.org
November 16, 2010
jeanette Coran
JCA Architects
2096 Lincoln Avenue
San Jose, CA 95125
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW A.CTION LETTER — Application R-2010-21:
This letter confirms the decision of the Director of Community Development, given on
November 12, 2010; approving a 649 square fc ot addition to the first floor and a 911 square foot
second story addition located at 10707 Santa L�cia Road, with the following conditions:
1. APPROVED PROTECT
This approval is based on a plan set enti tled, "Planning Submittal for: The Musa Family,
10707 Santa Lucia Road, Cupertino, CA 95014" consisting of twelve (12) sheets dated July
19, 2010 with a revision date of SeptembE�r 28, 2010; Geotechnical Peer Review by Cotton,
Shires, and Associates, Inc. dated Noveml�er 10, 2010; and color and material sheet, except
as may be amended by conditions in this r��solution.
2. ACCURACY OF THE PROTECT PLANS
The applicant/property owner is responsi �le to verify all pertinent property data including
but not limited to property boundary loc�tions, building setbacks, property size, building
square footage, any relevant easements an��/or construction records. Any misrepresentation
of any property data may invalidate this a}�proval and may require additional review.
3. GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNIC REVIEV'I
. The project shall incorporate all recommendations set forth in the engineering geologic and
geotechnical investigation prepared for thE development by Murray Engineers Inc., dated
November 2, 2010. �'
In addition, the project shall incorporate all the following conditions set forth in the geologic
and geotechnical peer review conductec. by Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., dated
November 10, 2010:
a) Structural Evaluation and S:ructural Plans. Prior to issuance of building
permits, the Project Structural Engineer shall evaluate the ability of the existing
footings to support the propo::ed loads, and shall provide suitable foundation
designs for either replacing ttie existing rear retaining wall or designing the
adjacent portion of the planr ed addition, assuming this old wall does not
provide lateral support. Structural plans shall be submitted that reflect the
recommendations of the Project Geotechnical Consultant.
b) Geotechnical Plan Review. Pri �r to issuance of building permits, the applicant's
geotechnical consultant shall rE view and approve all geotechnical aspects of the
development plans (i.e. si� e preparation and grading, site drainage
improvements and design parameters for foundations, drainage, pavement, and
retaining walls) to ensure th �t their recommendations have been properly
incorporated. The results of tl ie structural evaluation and structural plans as
mentioned in condition 3a, anci geotechnical plan review shall be submitted to
the City for review and appr��val by City staff prior to issuance of building
permits.
c) Geotechnical Construction Inspection. Prior to final (as-built) project approval,
the geotechnical consultant sltall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all
geotechnical aspects of the prc>ject construction. The inspections shall include,
but not necessarily be limited �:o: site preparation and grading, site surface and
subsurface drainage improvEments and excavations for foundations and
retaining walls prior to the pla :ement of steel and concrete. The results of these
inspections and the as-built conditions of the project shall be described by the
geotechnical consultant in a let and submitted to the City Engineer for review
prior to final project approval.
4. PRIVACY PLANTING
The final privacy-planfing plan shall be r��viewed and approved by the Planning Division
prior to issuance of building permits. If existing tree(s) is used for privacy screening, a letter
from a certified arborist shall be submitte � confirming that the tree(s) is in good condition
and is appropriate privacy protection in ar y season.
5. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT
The property owner shall record a coveiiant on this property to inform future property
owners of the privacy protection measure� and tree protection requirements consistent with
the R-1 Ordinance, for all windows with views into neighboring yards and a sill height that
is 5 feet or less from the second story finis 1ed floor. The precise language will be subject to
approval by the Director of Communit�� Development. Proof of recordation must be
submitted to the Community Developm��nt Department prior to final occupancy of the
residence.
6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPAR`CMENTS
The applicant is,responsible to consult witl other departments and/or agencies with regard
to the proposed project for additional con�iitions and requirements. Any misrepresentation
of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development
Department.
7. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS
Final building exterior treatment plan (inc luding but not limited to details on exterior color,
material, architectural treatments and/or �mbellishments) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The final
building exterior plan shall closely reser� �ble the details shown on the original approved
plans. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community
Development shall require a minor modifi�:ation approval with neighborhood input.
8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESEIZVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of :he dedications, reservations, and other exactions.
You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest
these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying
with all of the requirements of Sectior 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within two years, it shall expire on September 27,
2012.
Staff received a comment from a neighbor iriquiring whether any of the hillside landscaping
was proposed for removal and the setback requirement for the side yard. The applicant is not
proposing to remove any hillside landscapin,;. The side setbacks on the first floor are five (5)
feet on the east side and ten (10) feet on the west side. The side setbacks on the second floor are
20 feet on both the east and west sides. The pr.�ject's setbacks conform to the standards of the Rl
Ordinance.
Staff has made all the findings that are requir��d for approval of a Two-story Residential Permit
as required by the of Cupertino's Municipal C'ode, Chapter 19.28.100 (D). Also, please note that
an appeal of this decision can be made withi�t 14 calendar days from the date of this letter. If
this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled before the
Planning Commission.
Sincerely,
George Schroeder
Assistant Planner
City of Cupertino
408-777-7601
georges@cupertino.org
Enclosures:
Approved Plan Set
Cc: Shah Musa, 10707 Santa Lucia Road, C upertino, CA 95014
Yvonne Chen and Kai-Ti Huang,1072�� Santa Lucia Road, Cupertino, CA 95014
G:\Planning\MinorResidential\R1 Approvals\2010\R-2010-21 A�tior:letter.doc
M�sa Residence - 10707 Santa Lucia Road, Cupertino
Exterior Finish / Color Board
,;' - � � ,�� ��''a �'����������'''� � �. MonierLifeTile -
1 A y "?��` .1 f�
; . -�:��� �=��-:�.�����,s r � ,� . Type: Concrete Shake Tile
. . � ;�: � ��- � -�;.�
Color: Chestnut Brown
r,
, �
` j � 1�
�. �l � � � ,_: _ � . . ,._ � � _� c �.� � �
� �/ ,`: �.� ,
�r {�� � �
(: ^ �i �
_ r.� �:'� 1�.��1fi1 '�`'��r�;� �
t -- �. �� _�...��___ �_,..__•.,..,..._
- <► :� ..-.. `���rc��i ���R � -, � �
, �., _1.f� �,
,� � � � 1,,.._.,..� � : �
� ,._..,..._.,_ ..._.,...
.
; � .�.�... ,�- ��na u�Y�;
� _ '''�
� �^ �+.wn.w.O,lR _ .� . �. i �� Y� r _ . / ..:�t . � .
_.
.: i � �.,..,.,�,,..,� . _ . - ` �� �'� C � �
� _ �,..,�::
►! •'� �.-..+�--... � .r-��,,
� , �.. �
> ,•�.-'�'� ` ;,;rr..�. •; '�
�..:.�t�. - - EI Dorado Stone -
,. = t. ��..� -�.
- � �`-- � �" '��j Type: Mountain Ledge
� � `� � Color: Buckskin
�: S � � £. , y,?, - . _ .� .:
_,:.. x.
,, r
:'� �,.. W "`
..• ...>, -. . . _
- . �. _ '.:
�1 , .1� � . � �. a.y,
:� . � `�� ._ti.
�, `
x *� a�< . , --
��r . � . ;,y�
_ � _ �y
. —. . f .. :_� ..
_ �
���_-�� . .�_�^� 'i , W. , �.. ` ` `�_ �
. .. .. . . ..... .... _ . . . .. _
Wall Color -
Benjamin Moore Paints
996 Ashen Tan
Trim Color -
Benjamin Moore Paints
999 Rustic Taupe
Windows -
Milgard Windows and Doors
Type: Vinyl Windows
Color: Exterior Tan
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSO CIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND G
November 10, 2010
C5080
. . �. ;;: . _. . � �0/0 -- o 2i
TO : George Schroeder �� � ; � � � � � � � r.. r+J _ _ _ _ _._� _ _--_ _ .�
. a . � 1" .� s ? � � �,�. � . . �,,,_.�—�
Planni.ngDepartment a ������ - � ,, � �,�;��� __.__---��
CITY OF CUPERTINO ''°� r� � � � ...I _; .+.,: __ _ __ _� -- _. .�.. _ _
10300 Torre Avenue ������UI�%
Cupertino, California 95014 "�'" .:'"" �` � � e..or� .Sc�,� Q �
SUBJECT : Geotechnical Peer Review
RE : Shafquat/Musa, Proposed p.ddition
10707 Santa Lucia Road
At your request, we have com pleted a geotechnical peer review of the
Residential Design Review permit applic ation for the proposed residential additions
using the following documents:
• Engineering Geologic and Geo technical Investigation (report), prepared
by Murray Engineers, Inc., No� �ember 2, 2010; and
• Architectural Plans, including Site, Floor, Roof and Landscape Plans,
Elevations and Sections (12 sheet, various scales), prepared by Jeanette
Coran Architect, dated Septeml �er 28, 2010.
In addition to evaluation of the ab� �ve referenced documents, we have reviewed
pertinent technical documents from ou r office files and performed a recent site
inspection.
DISCUSSION
The applicant proposes to construc�t a second-story residential addition onto the
west side of the existing single-story resid ence. The southeast portion of the residence,
which was formerly a garage and now a family room, is to be converted back into a
garage and expanded slightly.
SITE CONDITIONS
The project site is characterized, i1 general, by moderately inclined (15- to 20-
degree inclinations), natural, east-facing hillside topography. Grading for original
residential construction has resulted in th� � development of a relatively level cut and fill
building pad. A concrete retaining wall, L p to approximately 7 feet in height, supports
Northern California Office Central California Office
330 Village Lane 6417 Dogtown Road
Los Gatos, CA 95030-7218 San Andreas, CA 95249-9640
(408) 354-5542 • Fax (408) 354-1852 (209) 736-4252 • Fax (209) 736-1212
www.coti onshires.com
George Schroeder November 10, 2010
Page 2 C5080
an upslope cut. This retaining wall ap: �ears to be in fair condition, but contains
abundant near-vertical cracks up to 0.1-ir_ch in width. One weephole was observed in
this wall, and one surface drain pipe extE nds through the wall immediately above the
weephole. The weephole and drain pipE appear to discharge onto a drop inlet that
conveys this runoff below a concrete pat o to an unknown location. A large retaining
wall, up to approximately 8 feet in height. is located along the southwestern portion of
the property, along the downslope side o= the driveway. This wall appears to support
fill material along the outboard edge of the driveway. Abundant cracks are located
along the outboard edge of the drivewa y, suggesting possible fill settlement and/ar
creep. We also observed several large cr�icks (up to 0.2-inch width) in the residential
foundation along the front of the structure.
Our site observations reveal tl �at surface drainage conditions could be
improved. Roof gutter downspouts disc��arge adjacent to the residential foundation,
and localized areas of ponding likely occu r in the rear patio area. The drainage behind
the upslope retaining wall is unknown, a 1d surface water on the slope above the wall
does not appear to be effectively captc red and conveyed past the residence. The
existing drop inlet at the foot of the rear re taining wall is somewhat unconventional.
Published geologic maps of the are a reveal that the site is underlain, at depth, by
valley floor alluvium and alluvial fan deposits (i.e., unconsolidated gravel, sand, silt,
and clay). The City Geologic and Seismic Hazards Map indicates that the building site
is located within an"F" zone, which defines a potential fault rupture hazard zone
associated with the nearby Monta Vista :'ault. Traces of the potentially active Monta
Vista fault have been mapped approxima tely 250 feet west of the site and 300 feet east
of the site. The active San Andreas fault i� mapped approximately 3.5 miles southwest
of the project site.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDEI� ACTION
The proposed residential construc tion is potentially constrained by expansive
surficial soil material, the potential for setl lement and creep of alluvial soil and artificial
fill materials, poorly controlled surface drainage conditions, the suitability of the
existing footings and potential for settlem �nt under the additional two-story loads, and
the susceptibility of the site to very strc ng to violent seismic ground shaking. The
Project Geotechnical Consultant has perfurmed a geotechnical investigation, including
the excavation of 2 exploratory borings, ar�d has concluded that the potential for surface
fault rupture to impact the proposed de��elopment is low. They have also concluded
that the potential for landsliding, liquef, iction, and/or secondary seismic hazards to
adversely impact the proposed additions : s low. We do not have geologic objections to
the proposed layout of the residential adclitions, and thus, recommend approval of the
permit application from a geologic standp� �int.
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
� George Schroeder November 10, 2010
Page 3 C5080
However, we do have two pri mary concerns regarding the existing site
conditions and their relationship to the ��roposed 2-story addition, specifically: 1) the
existing footings may not be adequate for supporting the second-story loads; and 2) the
condition of the rear retaining wall and ttie proximity of this wall to the proposed new
addition. The Project Structural Enginee�• should evaluate the condition of the existing
footings, specifically their ability to suppc►rt the proposed loads. Additionally, the rear
retaining wall, as shown on the building sections, abuts the new two-story addition.
This wall has abundant cracks and the P roject Geotechnical Consultant has indicated
that this wall has unknown foundatio 1 conditions and should not be used for
foundation support. Therefore, we do not recommend that the proposed addition abut
this wall, and recommend that considera ion be given to removing and replacing this
wall. Consideration could also be given 1 o designing the new residential living space
adjacent to this wall to withstand the static� and dynamic lateral forces from this upslope
area assuming the existing wall will iiot provide resistance. Consequently, the
following items should be submitted prior to issuance of building permits:
1. Structural Evaluation and Structural Plans — The Project Structural
Engineer should evaluate the � ibility of the existing footings to support
the proposed loads, and shoul�i provide suitable foundation designs far
either replacing the existing re�r retaining wall or designing the adjacent
portion of the planned additior� assuming this old wall does not provide
lateral support. Structural pla ns should be submitted that reflect the
recommendations of the Projeci Geotechnical Consultant.
2. Geotechnical Plan Review - 7�e applicant's consultant should review
and approve all geotechnical a,�pects of the development plans (i.e., site
preparation and grading, sit� drainage improvements and design
parameters for foundations, dr �inage, pavement and retaining walls) to
ensure that their recommendati �ns have been properly incorparated.
The results of the Structural Evaluation and Structural Plans and
Geotechnical Plan Review sho �ld be submitted to the City for review
and approval by the City Staff �►rior to approval of Building Permits. The
following should be performed prior to final (as-built) project approval:
3. Geotechnical Construction Ins�ection - The geotechnical consultant
should inspect, test (as needed;, and approve all geotechnical aspects of
the project construction. Th e inspections should include, but not
necessarily be limited to: site ��reparation and grading, site surface and
subsurface drainage improvem� �nts and excavations for foundations and
retaining walls prior to the plaa �ment of steel and concrete.
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
' George Schroeder November 10, 2010
Page 4 C5080
The results of these inspection, and the as-built conditions of the project
should be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and
submitted to the City EngineE r for review and approval prior to final
project approval.
LIMITATIONS
This geotechnical peer review has 1�een performed to provide technical advice to
assist the City with its discretionary permi t decisions. Our services have been limited to
review of the documents previously ide�ltified, and a visual review of the property.
Our opinions and conclusions are ma 3e in accordance with generally accepted
principles and practices of the geotechni<�al profession. This warranty is in lieu of all
other warranties, either expressed or impLed.
Respec�:fully submitted,
COTT��N, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CITY I;EOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
�
Jo M. Wallace
Princip �l Engineering Geologist
CEG 19 23
� ,
G �
David "'. Schrier
Princip �1 Geotechnical Engineer
GE 233� �
DTS:jMW:st
, . �.'.,t. _.. �C ��O[C� — ,�?I _
� � , —
".i�.j 1�',',✓���I�.,i�'° , _..-- '-- __Y_..�..._.� ..�. _ r..._..._
P�i�.�i��0.Ai `i� �,".`��� �� '� ��� �i, .. —
�, —
Jr�91c�tUli�
�:'.:.�, �,a,. ,_ � — -
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
,
�
�
U �
��
��
��
�
�o
��
�
�
remove (e) wood
stair to upper yard
new wood
landscape stair
75.12'
__ -- -- -- -- --
° ��� &� ° �� � &�
� �o
o ��° �
� o o I
� o o � o� o � o� I
U y I
@� � �
o ��
� N
� � � � I
�o c
� � --------------------� �
�i i
I I I
� �
� ; � �
� � �
o ,,. � . ; ,.� Io
20-o I I 20-0
� 2nd floor 2nd floor sideyard setback ,�
� sideyard setback I A � I O
I A5.0 I
�
�
� �
I � ���_ J f � � (e) drain
�— _ _._ . .
_ - - �:_ . u __ _ _ _ _ _
__ __ I __ �
�__�' _ _ _ _ -- -
(e) retaining i � � �'�,
wall � �� , � p �
� i
hatching indicates area � ��� �
I �
� - - -�
of I st floor addition i � /
I / ---I -----
(e) wood �' - - - - � �
fence
(e) retaining
wall to remain,
typical.
I O'-0" mm.
5'-0" I st floor � ' I I// I st floor sideyard setback
sideyard setback �
i � � , ��
I� � I � B
� , I ; - - � : � � As.o
� I i / i � hatchmg mdicates
. . � . .. , � �, � I � ..o�., I cf FI......
/ i � � � _ _ . _ .� __
� / � ' cross hatchm9
, . � . . . � I .,. —__—_—__ —_ � . . ..
-- ------- --- - ------ g il indicates new 2nd floor
- ' � 2nd fl buddin rimeter
I �. ` (e) concrete path
. I. , � I ----- 2nd fl roof pen � et I�_
' L__-_ --- _ �' I ' I ' (clean and repair)
� �f _ i ,
@ . (e) meters - gas 4
�, � , \\ i electric to be upgraded
� T � p '..-------- --- - ---- -----_ _ _.. ----.._ _ . ._.
_ 1 _ _
� . / O Y L I___ �
. � - T V O I� � _— _---.— ._ � I � .
L < � o
: . . � I . . N O .� � N �. 6� U _ . _ _ i . .. I .. i . . . . .. I
� c
� . . � ,� � p t O � �v . . . . I '
N `
E
J�
. N . V � � �� � � � � � � �
� ��� o .� first floor buildmg perimeter
o '" , �
(e) brick paving
(clean and repair) I - ` `�
(e) conc. curb z (
(e) asphalt paving i _
I � �
I :
� (e) wood fence
� �to remain
I
20'-O° i '
� dr�veway easement�
for flag lot
I �
� , first floor roof perimeter
—� _�. � . _ � � "�
(e) as halt avin ��
p p g (e) retaming
(clean and repair) sewer clean out wall to remain
remove
(e) fireplace
ad�. bui�ding
APN # 342- I 7-094
water company�
street I�ght �
Site & Proposed Roof Plan
sewer
�mail box
The Musa Residence
Cable N
PG�E�j�,
Planning Submittal For:
•
e usa a m�
•
a n a uc�a oa
.
u er �no,
r _ _____ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _. _____ ________
I 'i Scope of Work Project Data
� The scope of work involves an addition of approx. 350 habitable I I Zoned:
square feet to the first floor, an addition of 299 non-habitable , Type of Construction:
I square feet to the garage, as well as an add�t�on of a new second ', Current # of Stories:
' floor of 9 I I square feet. The garage wh�ch was non-conform�ng I�v�n ' PropoSed # of Stor�es:
I space wdl be re-converted back to a two car garage. Occupancy Type:
APN:
� ,
', Sheet index
I Total S�te Area:
! ARCf11TECTURAL
A0.0 Cover Sheet, Site Plan with Roof Coverage 4 Pro�ect Data
� e F wall penmeter calculations
2 A0.2 Site landscape Plan
' A0.3 Existing Site Plan
I emo i �o 0o n
I A2.0 Proposed First Floor Plan
i� A2. I Proposed Second F�oor Plan
j A2.2 Proposed Roof Plan
I A3.0 Existinq Elevations
i A4.0 Proposed Elevations
I ; A4. I Proposed Elevations
A5.0 Proposed Sect�on
First Floor Area Diagram - NEW I
��----- - --- �I
I I I
I� � --�' ._.. ... ... . . . . . ' :
I ,
i II 2 B � Second Floor. �
-- -----_ --; 2-A = 36 I SF i
I I __ 2-C ' 2-B = 303 SF ,
� - 2-C = I I 6 SF i
� 2"A , ' 2-D = 131 SF
! !� I 2-D � Total2nd �
I
' --.__._., -
I r Flr (habitable)- 91 I SF
� -- � I I
, I A � I-----I--B---��I First Floor:
' �— I _ -'__ - - � -A = 53 SF
, , - - -- -- --
, � I I-B = 32 I SF
I-C= I,I16SF
, l -D �', I -D = 627 SF
; I
, � �� I C Total I st
Flr (habitable)= I ,437 SF
� � I -F (garage) = 680 SF
�'�� - -� `�� Total I st FIr.= 2, I 1 7 SF
! non-hab�table ,
squarefeet '--------_ _.__._.___
��
y
i i8° = i �-o°
RI10
V-B
I
2
R3
342- I 7-093
8, I 88 SF
Existing Residence:
Existing Floor Area (habitable): I,087 SF
Ex�sting Garage Area (non-habitable): 381 SF
Total Existing Lot Coverage (SF): I,468 SF
Total lot coverage - percentage ex�sting 18%
Total Existing FAR 18%
Pro�osed Res�dence:
Proposed First Floor Add�tion 350 SF
Proposed New First Floor Area (habitable): I,437 SF
Proposed New Second Floor Area (hab�table): 9 I I SF
f ropoSEQ l�aragC Hddition: Gyy 7�
Proposed Garage Area (non habitable): 680 SF
Total Proposed Area (habitable and non habitable): F
Total New Lot Coverage (�nclud�ng roof eaves): 2,568 SF Q
Total Lot Coverage Percentage New: 3 I.4%o z
Total New FAR . o
� �
U �
N �
� .c
+
� �
Q .�
��
�a
o�
U�
N ,�,
a� �
c �
0 i
� 0
� N p O
���U
�� ^�
Q � U
�
����
�
o .° �
U � �
U
_,U �.,
� o CQ
���
�o C
O O�v �
���.�
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
Submittal:
Plahhi7g Preliminary Feview:
�.z�.zoio
, , „ , ,�„ ��,�o � .
94i 3.2010 J
Plannincj ReviSion Delta 2:
9.28.20 i 0
fAR calculation:
Net lot area; 8, I 88SF (excluding easement driveway access port�on)
Maximum allowbale FAR (for both story)
___; 8, I88 x 0.45 = 3,6855F r�,•., •e�r ?�-�. •�
, (Proposed Total Floor area =3,0285F) �. �.a,P��.r � „ ,. t, + .
r
F � : t�.�i ���r�ll�ii ��TM~ :
First Floor Area (including garage) ' 0.45 � -�
������ � � �
_ . _ ��_�.� :�- .c�. � �.,
, I I 75F • 0.4 = 9535P • � "' _ ' � "`
( roposed econd oor Area is I I ) ���r(�,�} �1{ "� 3R-, � r_ �
, c �_ v0 �..r .,� �.� r / �
_ __ _ .. _ .�4 _ - ��- � ,
;,� ,
���i��i�1 ;
„r;,ar i"'� _
Location Map � G-�- �'
i `i �""•� JI j
I ' t e �. . ,�.�.. .. � � ` ,1 � s i A �,�, . A ' '�,
, � � � f � ; ; � '_ .. • ,.,; �� �:
�°� a..,.�,.. �d~`� .....a.... �,} � . � .+� j
i � � +�..e. S r �..�.w,t. � i � t ,A °'`� . � �� i
I ��� ,..* ° M `�'� ". • ; `� ���
��� u��raM t� �WUr. �� .��.a.��. rw.r..va r ... �""d� ,
,,,.o� �'F� k:-�. , �� �' _, .,. � [ �
' .�s �► � °�..,. ...a . � � . � ..
� �,�� � ' . ''�_ „ ,,,, � rv.� .,�. �., .. . s_ � _~
.
�• �.. , �1
' � � :._- M �
" y
� . ..:, +
�— --1� --- _� �-- .
— _ .. 4 _ __ --_
�
__ SITE "
Sheet Title
cover sheet,
site plan 8�
project data
Pro�ect No. 20I0.38
Date 07. i 9.20 I O
Sheet No.
A0.0
I�
N
� 35'- I ' �
0
�
� 35'- I "
I less than 6'-O"
� i�
/ �
I / \
� i �
� / �
/ '-"�, �
/ / .�.�� L� �.-�- �,�:�,- i � .-,�� \ �
/ . ._L �.'�. u �, y:. i^ ' ,� �, � i 11�_ _��� \
/ �'�I i ly � ,.i ! i I, I�� � .
I I`'� i -"� - --� `� �_
I , �
/ I�
�
I 25 � � / � - -
/ i I I � ��!_� I� I�L I'�. I i ' �'i '� I�.
� i I � i �iil
/ i i
� i �I
I i II i � I I �
L — —
� i �
i, � i I � �� � �
�I I�I,�� i II k u�
, � ,
n �n nn�
�
�
O
�
I
I
I
I
I
I st floor I
'�- building I
�? - � envelope
m � \ I
- — \
_ �
I \ \ � I
li l� I� �i II �
�� i�� �ti�� �_ . � �_'_��'��_'_�_'_
(� s� ii C� ���� t�� �
� �� t�°�.� ��� �� � �`����- T�- _ - — '
�■ .� ��-` �� �=� t�u��� -•_
,
�
_ _. __ .. . e
�
�
�
0
�
I
I
I I st floor � � �
� building / �
envelope /
I /
/
/
� I I�
�— — — — �i i i� �
-�O ------
I
I
35'- I "
I I
26'- I I" 8'-2" I
�� more than 6'-0" less
' /� than 6'-O" I propert Ime, —�
I / � typical
I / �
l / \ I �
I / � , , .LL�� � � ' I
i ,�I' !llil�� �II II � j �� �
/ 'I I�'� � �' II � �, �I I� ; ; \
i I� lil �I I' ''I ' � I
'Yj'` II �;
\
� I
\
I
\ � 25°
\
� I I . ��! —
,i ._! u �i_ ! i �.� I
❑❑❑ ❑�❑ - - - - - --- -- ------ --- - I Q
� �
�
I
(N) west elevation (rear)
� �
U . O
N N
L �
i� i
m
� / � Q 'c
� / \ a O
/ \ � -
� / \ O �-
�� , 30'-8" � � �! \ � � �
� / / 1 7'-0" \ � � a�i
I 3'-8"
, Iess than 6'-0" more than 6'-O" � � r
/ ' �
o
, ,
,
/ ��
� / _ --�-'�� o
I � i'} _ 1._. ;�-� ._.�w' . �� ._
/ � �. � .
I / � . � .i_ :1 i - ..,� , ., � ' i ..
/ . .� � :; � �_�
/ - I� L �'� i ��', I �� i i �I i I � i i I I i� I i � I �' 'I I �i ��I �
� --
'
I st floor -
/
I o
/
buildin � - _
9 ,
� envelop/ � cn ` � � -
��� ii � r
I / �I i ��. � .- ----
�/ �.L_�L� �1 _�--�-�� � I�
/ � 1
— o � �� � � .� . �i:_ ':. ,.� , -
N � i i i i i i
� i ��� � L�L� I � � i i i
� N p O
�� � U
� �` � vi
Q P U
� O N
•���
� O V
O = �
U � �
JU �.�
o�
c�
���
O � �
�o -' � C
o�°�
N��•,
_ - .. - . .. . .
� � - ..
. � � . . . •...
• �_ �—..�.__��--_—,� _�:� •—_� . - . �
�� —,���.—,��—,��� '=,�
�=• ��� ���=�� �' � �—���
� � �±� .�� � � * -,� '
, �_:�� ia��
i � �' �'= �' ��'= —�=�
_ ��, !�� _(�� _,�,� t�����_�
�� =���=�r' �=i ��,���ar�'��
(New) north elevation (right
/ / \ �
/ �
/ \
/ �
� �
/
/
/
/
(New) south elevation (left)
3/ 16"=1 '-0"
. : t''�,� �' �� �� e , �� ��'�DO � vC �
�'� �.' . -- -- - — -� -�
�� �. , � r � � I I � i� �'�,� ..
1 n+ J ___._ _ -1"_ � � _ ,o..r .......�... _
. .
�;w�r����1 �:.���
����� } � `_- Submittal:
h ^ �, •y Planniny PrCliminary RCView:
�ia�����.r��; . � 2� 20�0
- y,. . , ,
7'�.C�R,.t�^w*1:�:� 9y13.20ip�., �,.�..
' .l:.luv ..r.wc h�.}
y Plann�ng Revision Delta 2:
� 9.28.20IO
�
0
3/ 16"=1 '-0" 3/ 16"=1 '-0
! Second floor addition less than 6'-0": 13'-8" + 35'-1" + 21'-7"+ 8'-2" = 78'-6"
!' Second floor addition more than 6'-0": 17'-0" + 9'-1 "+ 26'-11 "= 53'-6"
', ', Total second floor perimeter: 131'-6"
� _ ___ ___ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _
Sheet Title
second floor
exposed wall
perimeter
calculations
Pro�ed No. 2010.38
Date 07. � 9.20 I 0
Sheet No.
A0.1
Existing Trees
Tree # Speaes D.S.Yi. Canopy Crown Preservation
11e�ght Rad�us 5u�tab�l�ty
I Quercus Agnfolia 8" 20' I 5' Moderate
2. Quercus Agr�fol�a 8" 20' I 2' Moderate
3. Quercus Agrifolia l 2" 25' 20' t1�gh
4. Quercus Lobata 8", I 0", I 2" 35' 30' tiigh
5. Prunus Cerasifera 8" I 5' I 0' Low
6. Juniper Communis 8" I I' I 0' Low
7. Juniper Communis 8" I 0' I 0 Low
8. Juniper Communis I O" I 2' I O' Low
Copied from the Tree Description Table from the Pre-Construction Tree lnventoryand
Cert�fied Arbo��st's Report.
r ' '�. °i. I� - �OtO � a�� � . .._ _ �
� _ . ,. ���. - - - '-., -- --_...�'" "
;� �:`� �°. „i�a� 1�= ����i�: `� r... � ...�,. . -
y , _ �__� --
� �' � R''
4 J I
�;�������t !��.� __�_ r!.. ��.�...�.�.-�--�- ---
.
�ig��dtuf•� , _ . -
„
{�,ti k,fl�AfN.%i�' �
j .
(E) trees to remain for
privacy sr_reenin9, refer
to arhorist's report.
_..___ - � '- - - - -
� ���~' �'��w' i� �` �
o .o o �� � 9
I �� � p the "Reiease of Pr�vacy
0 0� o o� Protect�on Measures" prov�ded
� p o o I by the City of Cupertino
O� O � O� O ��� I
00� � ��
� (N) Arbutus Marina
� trees (mm. 8' planting
a , � he�ght and 24" box
I --------------------
� r 1 I m�n.) at I 5' spacing or
� � I I equivalent privacy
�,� I I screening materials as
`-° � I�Hed e Trees � � requ�red by the Gty of
? o I g � I I � Cunert�no (see note).
�� I � I
� � I �--�-FJ
(E) trees to remain--�� �
O � for prwacy � _ � I O
screening, refer to I _- I
� � arborist's report. � � � I d�
O � � 1ledge Trees � O
� � � � �
I(E) drain Ime behmd I I -----
retaming wall directs � � ��' `���\
� to drain. � � f `
� I I � � V�
������������������T ,���
� T, ,
�- - — -- - - - _- ---- - -- - .
.
, 1._- .. __ _ ' _. .
f _. �_ __...__:_� -,--''i
(e) retaining- �� � i — � �� � � � ' �
wall F �--�--/ ' I I �P ii � ? `\�`. .�i� .y.
�
I -- - -------- - _� �
i Second floor � � � ;; �
p Y p 9 a� I, I -------- �
clerestory windows, no - I ,
, rivac lantin re ` � `�� ;
! ' ' I �
� r �', � f ; I �� �� �
I I - _� 4 , i� �/
I (E) trees in I -
ad�acent lot � � I I;('
I for privacy � '� �� E-- ;� j i
� � ,
i screernng. '. � �; , ; , �`„ -
�i i '� , i ; `` _ _
- - �` .,_ � _.,
� � 1: I . � ��.. N � � � ��� � � � � � � � Y. �� �
I , �
; .-
�� � I �
_ ; I ._ __
I _ ,
, i I �......�._ _�._
i --- ---- -- � —� , ,
.
= •- j � �
,
� " ' I -- ------------�_--_�- --- ---- —� �'�'' _ ''� ,
� �' � --- � � , i � �
— — ' � u ��i , �
I �
� �
� Indic es window I ' -- -------------------- ; . _ __
------- - -\�-
� locati ns. typical. ' �
, � �
I '- ---- _ _ __ _ -- - -- - - - -- -�- � _ _ _ _ . �
-- -- -
_ _ . /' /' / I l/
�,I � I
� � ��
,�������������
>
� DRAINAGE:
� Building is located on the flat
portion of the property. Any water,
> including all downspouts, shall be
> drained away from house towards
� nearby landscape area, typical.
>
' ((E) drainage pattern to remain.)
i
1
� � ,���� � � ; , � � �` � �� 75.1
I `
' I (N) Olea Europea (Ohve) trees (min. 8' Q
� � � plantin9 height and 24" box min.) at I 5'
, � n spaang or equivalent privacy screenmg
� ' materials as requ�red by the City of
� Cupert�no (see note).
, �
I '
I
I `
� � APN # 342- I 7-094
I •
I
� �.
75.12'
Note:
O p��pn O 00 � �n Required privacy planting may be
�0 Qor� wa�ved �f affected ne� hbors sign
5-8
(e) trees to be
removed
...�.��...
(e) storm drain
�
- (e) landscape area
�
(N) Aesculus Californica
(California Buckeye),
mm. 8' plantina height
and 24" box min. at I 0'
spacing or equivalent
privacy screening
materials as requved
by the City of
Cupertino (see note).
Second floor
- clerestory w�ndows, no
privacy planting req.
Roof slope, typ�cai.
�
Stairway clerestory
windows over 5' above
landin9, no privacy
planting req.
(e) landscape area
to remain
�
�
�
�
Site Landscape Plan with Privacy Screening and Drainage
��
y
�,8�� - � �_o„
� �
N N
� .c
U +
L m
Q .�
� c
c
� O
O a
U +
�
N �
�
N a��i
c �
� U
N �
��°O
���U
> a �. �;
Q P +-
� U
o �
���
t
co��
O = �
� p �
J U �.,
o @�
N � �
O � �
�O � � C
O a � �
NN�:•
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Rood
Cupertino, CA 95014
Submittal:
Planniny Prehminary Rev�ew:
�.2�.20 � o
rianning Revis�on ve��a �:
9. i 3.20 i 0
Plannin9 Revision Delta 2:
9.28.20 I 0
Sheet Title
Landscape Plan w
Privacy Screening
8� Site Drainage
Pro�ect No. 2010.38
Date 07. � 9.20 I 0
Sheet No.
A0.2
" /2��D � c� --� I
_+ r s� , . , . _. ___ Y- •
,���1 ����+!������411 R�� .....�_�-__. �1 ...��.._
�,�, . .
_ �,,.�•,�-,�.�_� ,o.,�- �
��������i �'��j _�.__ 1 �-�.��� - _
�i���tu���;
���
�r; ?<��; !l��?�r. � �
'" i i' �
.{ I ' I �
� �
, I I
� I
,. .. . . �F . ' ' �y--*�--- � - ' .... . . .
I
I I
I L---------------------------------------J i
I � � Paved path
I __._ . _ I '
( _ . _ _ _. _._ _ __ ' �
� _ sewer � (e) dirt area for
- asphalt �cleanout ��andscaping
�imgation pavement
— — — — —, —. —, —a —,--: ,: s
�.:_�_. _____,__: —. 75.12'
���x
�.
�
�.
,.
�.
asphalt I
driveway � '
�a
I:
I
I'
�� APN # 342- I 7-094
I.
I
� .
water �
street I�ght�
Existmg Site Plan
sewer
I mail box
�
�
�
�
�
SANTA LUCIA ROAD
pg6e
�cable
1�
y
i ie° _ � ,
r iannmg icevision �eica i:
9. i 3.20 i O
Plahnin9 Revision DeIW 2:
9.2b.2010
Sheet Title
Existing Site Plan
Pro�ect No. 2010.38
Date 07.19.2010
Sheet No.
A0.3
� �
�i�' '�o�o -�,%
�, � _ _ �
3_. "�' -
,
��:a �.��,t�C����� �. � _ — - _ _..�._
, -
_�_ . Q _ �..:�
.,
�,���G'��i ��;��� r I -� � -�c
. ,�. __.�__<�mr=.�m.cv..�... ....... � -.
f�� '
�i�il�tl,���`; _ _ . w
; ��s���;�;��xr s
_ , . �.
�
�arage
�ed as
bitable
�ace
; -n (e) water heater to be
i ii removed l saved for
r--- --�===================�---�
i rT i� r, i relocation.
� � � � �� � � i 1 � I
_�_'_---- __ J I \ 11 1 I I I 1 I
""
r----_--_-__ _� 1 — I � II 1 I I I 1 1
, � � ,; -----,�r � , . � � � �
i�-------� i i ii dw I i `� ii ��----' i
� ���Y L___ 1
' ' i i '` ---'� — �.}-� r ; ;
V„ CIOS. � i i ,n.z� �
�� � � � asl�e�/
�_ �_� , � � �,
�____ �-- ���._ �� dry�r, �
� ' r� ���r � ��ds. ; ;
i � > ��
._ �7 �Y �� �i i i i
� j�C,��c�� _. .. ..._R.__ . _I _.i �------- ----
kitchen -- -------
' �L�_yl I r-r—....._..i .._""._.._.....__.... ________� c "�� -' �_____ - _� 1
I �
� y i � I I I 'r � I / 1 I
� � 1 I 1 \� I I \ Y% ' 1 I
� �, � 11 �\ i L'________� . II
, , �� „ ��
' ---' �� ��
_ ,_ -- � � � �
lab-on-grade �
' to rema�n
E---�—
' - ---- ---�
pantry � ref �
' F ----�
�
„ i i
. ___ _�_ _._� � _. ___�
- �r-1
-_____________3L-----�--- � i
I r- J
i ="� ;
� , �
� i i
i � i
' fire � ;
� , �
i
�
(e) br�ck fireplace i «<ti i
3 foundation to ��-� i� i
���_J
be removed. �
ii
�i
ii
��
ii
��
living room
� � bath � ;
��
� � �' bedroom 2 ' '
I _____"'_" I �T
1 f"_-____�1 1 i-il � III
���. I 1 j II� �, III
II� 1 1/ II�. III
i�; i v u in
iii
I L-- _� �� iii
-- -- ------ �_ i i i
� ____� - W
�
' ��\ -n
i � � ' ' u
� u
' r5 =i i n . ,,
�� � �_ _ ._---� u �
' �--------------- _ --- ' � ;,
i i�i i r i
i i° % i C�OS. i `
� � ;;_; ' rr- -� ' ' � (e) under-floor
T
i � ;'; � � �� � access to removed
11 L_______J
� i ;' L_ J j/ relocated.
ii '---------------
�� ---------------'
ii ----- �i
� � bedroom 1 -- ---,
ii ' ii
i i C�OS. i i i
ii � ii
ii .� � ii
i� � , ii
ii � ��
__� � � �`.` � �
u ;i � �
%�' ° i i � � gas � electric meter
i i � � � ---- �-----�
� i� � � locations to remain.
i u �'
'--------- ..__._.... _. .. J 1_.__ ._. _ .... ---T-------------- .. _..--� =-�-- � ---�- ..
-------------- U ---------------�---- �
� remove all windows 4
doors, typ�cal.
�(e) porch columns to
remain, typical of three.
First Floor Demolition Plan
1?
y
t /4" = I '-0"
Demolition Legend
- - - _ _ _ _ = Ewsting construction to be removed.
`__ '� " - ":" _ Ewstin9 construction to remain.
U
N
�
U
Q
C
�
O
U
a�
�
�
C
�
N
�
� N p O
���U
1 �` n vi
Q � U
o N
���
. �
C �� �
O :�- �
U � p
C Vi
J U �.,
.o@�
N
� � �
O � �
O a ° v �
cV v� �-: ,
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Road
Cuperfino, CA 95014
Submittal:
Pla�nmg Preliminary Review:
7.27.201 O
y , , ,,,., ,,,..". , .
9413.20 i 0
Planning Revision Delta 2:
9.28.20 I O
Sheet Title
first floor
demolition plan
Pro�ect No
Date
Sheet No.
A
20 I 0.38
07.t9.20i0
■ • 0
', F;
': r � ;._���-�-��._ ��aoro •-��
,:
:�� ° ����iii�`����' � - -- .___�_- �. .�
_�_s�__ r- . -_ _ = - - ,�.. - -
�����G`��I ����' . ll��
._ _ _ _....... _ -
�ign��u���
����^�� [.''`�',,'� , -- __ � ..� _
. �d i
. 1O'-0" '��
,
i
_ ..,__ _ _ '
r ---- -----
� wash dry
�
� �
,
`� ; laundry � '
c
�
L�
First Floor Plan
�
.. .
rear of house
50'- I 0"
� 27 �_ � �,
�u -
�
fl b eakfast
8'-7"
(e) conc.
� retaining wall
.
---- ---
I ----- -----
i new conc. step ',
�
I'
I
I , _ �
� ' - _
i patio ' - -
�
I �
family I �,
� ---- -
I � � ; � room ----
I furn + � �
I (n) water heater I �� � dW �
and furnace on � , � I I'_2"
I; ,
I platform � ' � kitchen �
{ I� I (n) 2nd floor� Wh ' � (n) 2nd floor �
buildin erimeter I O�. _ � buildin erimeter -
I gp � v _� 9P II -
20'-0" � i u� ���� _
I from platform to wall � ,� - �P � bedroom
I Q garage i i; � j 4
I : .:,: ;I B
I � (—►-down _
� pantry I /� ns.o
I � �- ,' �/ � - -� — -
�, � ,
� �.��. .. ._:, . _
- -
new slab�(e) conc. slab � �' ' linen F L- 1- `
on grade on grade _ ,---------[---- ----- — 1�
----
� -�--- �_ .. .� . �...'., ._,� _
�� ii ii i 0
I i (n) or (e) I hr i'. r ---------------- i i i , m
I rated wall : ;---- i � � � � � cdat!
- -----
;; i i i i i i i ;, (n) under-floor
I , (n) ceiling � I � i � i �
I i � � � coffer ; I �_ � __ -_ - -� _ , ,,._ ' access location
} Q
V ��
� N
� ,C
U +
Q �
c
� c
c
� o
o Q
U �
N �
��
�-
� �
N �
� O
jC�V � O I �
���U
) � n vi
Q � U
o N
�•`C=
�
co��
o :-- °
� p a
J U �.v
�°�
���
O a �
O � � �
NN� �
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Road
Cuperfino, CA 95014
Submittal:
Plann,�y PrCliminary RCViCw:
�.z�.2o � o
rear of house
N �
U . O
N N
� C
U +
� �
Q .�
� c
C
� O
O �-
U�
� �
� U
a� a�
c �
� U
� �
��o�
���0
> P � }
Q � U
o N
��}
�
C �� �
O = �
U � p
C
J U �.v
.OUd
�
���
oa�
�O � C
O a � �
CV N :-: • �
Remodel S. Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
� ; �, ��. ,� � : {,'r; ¢r
: . �-a�;�;� . _. _. :. �—�v10 —�2 %
# ,�
--- -- ------- - -- � ,
:���� ���ti���;�,
� �. _�s_ � --...� __ _ ,..... _. �..a.... _ .
��������� I ��i� 1l -I -io
. �_ . _ � _.-.-, - �..� ,� _
s��t' —
�i.c��a�u� ;
i '., t .,., .,,., ., � _ �vt_
� �. .. .. , }_
I I // y
�
I �
�
�
(
�
I
I
I
(
I
� -- -- -- ----�
I
I
�
�
Second Floor Plan �
i
i
i
i
i
, ,
� �
�
� ,
I I
I
�
�
� I
� I
I
I I
I
�
� I
�
� �
�
�
I
�
I
�
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
1�
y
I /4"= I 0'-0"
Floor Plan Legend
New construct�on
: _ . Existing construction to remain
New or existin9 one hour rated wail
between 9arage and habitable to
unders�de of roof structure
Submittal:
Planning Preliminary Review:
7.27.2010
I �a � �„� „�������� „� �e � .
9.13.20i0
Planniny Revision Delta 2:
9.28.201 O
�eet Title
:cond floor plar
�ect No. 20 i 0.
.e 07. i 9.2C
'P.0 NO.
�2.1
a � y- ; ;� - �'?� } 3) � o'� 0 ! � '�2 I
4 3 �wa���.* 5 .. � ^" . ' .__ __. ..�.. � 3
�
��'! I�����i�����:�� �-�"� __..�.._
, r -:� s_ �-�:.:_-� - ,�. _
����� �yi.,
'��) �. �; --�,� . � _
' _���.�� .- ..�- -��� _ s. _ /0
:����a��� �; _ _
,I`nrr, : . -;p,� : �
:........,.,, j�...
Roof Plan
/ -
; �� �
�
' I
-- - -- ------------ -------
—� ---- — -- -----
---- -- - -- - C
c
�
��
y
I /4"= I 0'-0"
Roof Plan Legend
A. Pa�nt all sheet metal roof flashing and saddles to
match roofing material color. Paint to have a flat
firnsh.
B. New roofs to have 6: I 2± roof pitch
unless otherwise noted on plans or elevations.
Overhangs at eaves and rakes to be as noted on plans
and elevations.
Sheet Title
Roof Plan
Pro�ect No. 2010.38
Date 07.19.2010
Shee,t No.
A2.2
F1 ', '
..� f , __ a , ` �a�/� �:J�'
.� �: � �.' y �,� l � �i ��r�� �� - _ _. �.�. ._..._
r! E.� r.�
• � + �� ia `9ft� ���+�R.+ .__�_,___� �'-�'� �(1 � - -__
� l� '? � :.1 i�. v/ '�
� ._ _ ,_ _. - �. ,
����t�d�� �
. i, � . ...__ --
�, _ ---
� _ _ -
- s
°� - - -___
�J �a - ----
+I � _ - --
� - - - - ---- - ---
Remove (e) fireplace -
(E) east elevation (front) � chimney
�
s
m
�
S _ _
�
C
�
�
�
�
+�
�
m
(E) south elevation (left)
�
V
+I
(E) west elevation (rear)
______________________ _ I st Floor Plate: 8'-O" 6
----------------------- —
_ �
_ - ---- -------- �, s
_ � a-
-- .__ _._ .__.-- ---._ ..---� � � c
- - -. __ . _ _. . .. .__ . __ . -__- �
- ..__.- _.__.._.__
_ __-_._ . -__ -. ._____
_ ..._"__ _ ._. _- +� �
- - - Remove (e) board and �
- -- --_ - - --- — _ _..
_ _ - - -------- batten siding a�
-.... --._ - - - _
-._ _--- -
- - --- --
---- _ _ _ __ ---- -- --- I 5t loor: -
Remove (e) front door
Remove (e) front door
.._...--- ,-. ... - r �---
6 chimney
114"=1'-0"
i1LfiBf�ly1
�
�
�
I st Floor Plate: 8'-0" �
-------------------------------- ----------- ----- m
-------- �
__-- --- -- -- �
-. -_ - - _
�-- - --- - �
�
--- - --- - _... _ - -- - �
- - - - _ _ .�
-- -- -- -- — -- - -- +�
_ _ -- - �
-- - -- -- -- - -- — _ _ _ _ - - �
. . _. . . ._. ___.. _ ... . ____ ... ___
_ -- - __ I st Floor: 0'-O�
(E) north elevation (right)
va°=r-o•
iIL•y6lE�li�
'late: 8'-O"
"IOOr: Q�-���
U
�
L
�
Q
C
�
O
U
a�
a�
C
�
�
1
a�
o �� o
C � c� �
U
� �� a�
+ Q U
p� co
C � o N
� •� ' t
� � O i
�- O = �
°' c a a
5 J U.�,v
� _OU
m � c� �
� ���
i � P �
� � � _
� � � �
N�� -�
Remodel & Addition For:
' The Musa family
10707 Santa Lucio Road
Cupertino. CA 95014
Submittal:
Plannng Prelim�nary Review:
7.27.2010
I na�n�ng icevis�on ue�.ta i:
9. i 3. 20 I O
Planning Revision De!ta 2:
9.28.20 i 0
�et Title
�ting elevati�
t No. 2C
07. 1 �
No.
\3.0
.._..."' �.. ." ""_. .,..,....� i�c,ii�vvc, ai� �c./ uvvi�
around house, typical. and trim, typ.
6�� 7,. . 1 . }
.' � :�,,,��°.�J _�. f . /Q—�OIU —�/
.s
.�� � ��.�.�i��l����.`�� � �_ _ _ __�_.....__._
. _ ___ ___ _ - - ,...,,__ - -- .
�����,.�� �f���. �C�-��� -,d
, �� �s"!''st�
. -- -- - - — -�...,. — _
��
�I��1�tUfi;
.,+'z,.,, i�;��. ,'� � .. -- -�..�
.�..,., �
- - - _ - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ - - -- --- new class 'A' cement
_ _____ __. - _.-_ ----- _ _ _ . --
roof tiles
I2 _
� I -
._. __ .__. , _. � ._ _
_
, ,
5
- - i -'�' � � - - - - � 2nd Floor Plate: I 8��_���
� ------------------------ ..�_. -----------------------------------
� - I ` - - - - - -
m
� �_painted fascia 4 trim
�o
�„ new vinyl windows new (3) coat li htl
Y
t
9
c Q'
� sanded stucco finish.
0 3 I 2 '�L -�_, ��..�1_. i_ I
� Q � � � I . � . � , . -•,y , I-
@ �`-� - - -� x,--�4. .��.,_ 1-�--'� ����.- _u.
N 5 `���! i � I � i �
, .
�, i � � , � , � � _
�_�..� ,
� @ - - - - - - - - � �-_.. �+' �-1=-1'^� ,�`-i�-' �' Y� =• � � � � ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 nd F I oor_ I 0'_O_'
„
- ,
i i i � -
3 E i � i 'I � I �, I� i i � i I � I� , � I i I i
o ������-.! 1__ f�.i�l � �-1�i !� � - �'-� � � - -
- � i i
,i � �
I i i' i I ,��
O I �I.
li �i � I i l i I I I I,
� �i I � i _
I � � i I� I i ,
i i'
E
� 1 1 �I I � � i I st Floor Plate: 8 O
p - ---- 1`��: i'�� - -- � , ----------------------
�
N
n li h
ew c at tl
3 0
n li h � )
+I e
w t
9
Y
_
9
-
ini h
�
fix r
sanded stucco f s
tu es
�
.
N � � I; ��� I f -� �}y i -, ,--- � �� p� �
� '' �yp ��-- I �"� . :' .' eqe �°'
L� �:����. �� i'��' L� I�Ji L_ ;� -J L,
I�� � � � �� i� ' '�. -
�' �' � I I` i
--� -- - -- _ ,�� �_; -
;
,�,
� ��'� � �� �� .
I st Floor. 0-0
I
New) east elevation (front
painted roll-up
garage doors (x2)
\ L new stained wood door
`- house number
new wood trim around
(e) columns / posts.
new stone veneer sidiny
1 /4 � �-0��
where shown.
'i
5 I 2 , � I � '�� �I I� � I I �' l l I I
� li__�a_1
i I � i i I I il
� � �I ��II I li I ! ' I il II' �I, �! I� I i� I I I'' !� � I �
I
�
�
7n.1 Flnnr Pl�+v• I R"_(1"
(New) north elevation (ri
1 /4��- � �-0"
U
�
L
�
Q
c
�
O
U
a�
�-
N
c
a
N
�
°��aE
�
���0
� �` n �n
Q �()i
o N '
��}
�
���U
O.� �
U � p
� , U
�U
�o�
���
� O a �
O � � �
Nv�� �
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
, 10707 Sania Lucia Road
I Cupertino, CA 95014
Submittal:
Planning Preliminary ReviCw:
7.27.2010
I �a,� �, � ,��������� „� � � .
9. I 3. 20 I 0
Planni�g Revis�on Oe!ta 2:
9.28.2010
�et Title
N elevations
�t and right <,
;t No. 20
07. I 9
No.
�4.0
� � 2nd Fioor Plate: I 8'-0"
------------
2nd Floor: I O'-0"
�-------------
I st Floor (e�late: 8'-0" _
�-----
� , I st Floor: 0'-0" _ _
-----------
Section A-A
i►L�i��T�
� �
U . O
� N
L �
+
� m
Q c
� c
C
� 6
o a
U�
� U
N �
C L
� �
� �
��o�
���0
) �` n v�
Q P U
o N
O � =
L
C �� i
o= �
�p o
J U , . c?
,oU
N �' �
� � }
O a �
�o � C
a � o a
o���
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Road
Cuperfino, CA 95014
Submittal:
Planni�g Prelim�,nary Review:
7.27.2010
U
�
L
i
Q
C
�
O
U
N
�
N
C
�
�
�
� N p O
���U
� �` n �i
Q P U
o �
���
. �
C �� �
O = �
� p �
� (� , o . C?
.o@�
c�
N � �
� O P �
� � O �
N N � • �
Remodel & Addition For:
The Musa Family
10707 Santa Lucia Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
-� ., -� ;t� `+i�; �� �_�0/C� � �!
• � �. � �� [� � � � ��� - - — � ' �. �
— — �..
.��.9 t���ai���±�'i�:i� - =—� - – . .
_ _ _ _ ,�� ;.Y.,--
�rr�r ''' `" �� �ID
.�►,�� � , �— r �C -�. -- - — -
, ► • � a�` _.f �c�;:
— �....�.
�f��lClfl.ii�> _ .
i'�r. i ' .,�. � � ..
, ,... ......, �. .
(New) south elevation (left)
,' �L
_l� 1� � � ' I ' I ' �
' � �' ''�.1 II IJ IJ I I IJ � �
,� i i , II I�� ' I �I I' � s
i , ;i
�i � i` ii��i ii � ii�� .;i�i ii;��i ii��,
(New) west side elevation (rea
columns � tnm
1 /4"- � �-0��
1 /4 � �-0��
Submittal:
Pla�ning Preliminary Review:
� �� �n � n
Planning Revision Delta � �
9. I 3.20 I 0
Planning ReNS�on Delta 2:
9.2b.2010
Sheet Title
new elevations
rear and left side
Pro�ect No. 20 i 0.38
Date 07.19.2010
Sheet No.
A4.1