110-I. Reconsideration Petition filed 1/18/11.pdfATTACHMENT I
To be completed by City Clerk staff
Staff Form - Appeals
(attach to Appeal form submitted) Pe:b `Ti 7�A-- COkq Q,je�� .,
i . Application No.. t r - 2-
2. Fee submitted? Yes No
3. Date of decision or mailing: l J 2 It
4. Date appeal received: `) `Z t
S. Hearing scheduled for 6y 3.1 l9
Ih,
6. Notification sent to:
Applicant(s)
Appellant(s)
ct Interested parties�-
c Planning Department
7. Date legal notice published: 1 3 f,- O t 0
appealslstaff.doc
City Clerk
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Ave
Cupertino Ca. 95014
Petition for reconsideration of Councils Decision on Dir-2010-30 per 5 b,c
JAN 1 8 2011
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
5b/c City staff report is inaccurate on several item.
Safety- only one other pair of duplexes on 915 and921 Miller Ave are the same in garage location and
shared driveways , there are no front set back parking pads. All the rest of duplexes have front garage
excess and driveways. The assumption that no vehicular / pedestrian /bicycle accidents happened is that
this design is safe - is wrong. The fact that this proposed proposed parking pad is like most duplexes
on the west side of Miller Ave is no different - is wrong. This proposed pad would be the only one on
the front setback. Driveways of the other duplexes are not front setbacks and cars park much closer to
the garagedoor leaving ample room for safe passage.
The proposed pad with the intended SW or car parked therein totally obstruct the view to the
right sidewalk traffic (pedestrian and bicycle), any vehicle exiting from the driveway will be over the
sidewalk before the driverr sees anything coming.
Respectfully yours
Erwin Wolf
10326 Virginia Swan PI
Cupertino, Ca 95014