The URL can be used to link to this page

1-18-11 Searchable Packet èÛÚÐ×ÍÖùÍÎÈ×ÎÈÉ ûÕ×ÎØÛ ø×Ù×ÏÚ×ÊùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐÏÓÎÇÈ×É øÊÛÖÈïÓÎÇÈ×É ø×Ù×ÏÚ×Ê ùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐÏÓÎÇÈ×É øÊÛÖÈïÓÎÇÈ×É ûÙÙÍÇÎÈÉìÛÃÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØ×ÎØÓÎÕø×Ù×ÏÚ×Ê øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ìÔÛÉ×óæÍÖÈÔ×÷ÏÌÐÍÃ××å×ÐÐÎ×ÉÉìÊÍÕÊÛÏ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ å×ÐÐÎ×ÉÉìÊÍÕÊÛÏùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÉ å×ÐÐÎ×ÉÉéÇÊÆ×Ãê×ÉÇÐÈÉ ùÔÛÎÕ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×é×Ð×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖùÐÛÉÉÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÊ×Ù×ÓÆ× ûÇÈÍÏÍÚÓÐ×ûÐÐÍÅÛÎÙ× éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÎÓÏÛÐÉÓÎøÓÉÛÉÈ×ÊûÎÎ×ÄÈÍùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ÷Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃìÐÛÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÎÓÏÛÐøÓÉÛÉÈ×ÊûÎÎ×Ä ö××ÅÛÓÆ×ÊÖÍÊéÈòÍÉ×ÌÔªÉùÛÈÔÍÐÓÙéÙÔÍÍÐûÈÔÐ×ÈÓÙè×ÛÏÉ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈû ëÇÓÈÙÐÛÓÏø××ØÛÎØûÇÈÔÍÊÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊçÎØ×ÊÕÊÍÇÎØåÛÈ×Ê êÓÕÔÈÉéÈ×Æ×ÎûúÊ×ÓÎÚ×ÊÕÛÎØøÛÎÎÛéúÊ×ÓÎÚ×ÊÕ ùÍÊØÍÆÛêÍÛØûìî ê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ëÇÓÈÙÐÛÓÏø××Ø ïÛÌ ëÇÓÈÙÐÛÓÏø××ØÛÎØûÇÈÔÍÊÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊçÎØ×ÊÕÊÍÇÎØåÛÈ×Ê êÓÕÔÈÉêÛÏÛÎæïÇÏÏÓØÓÆÛÊÛÌÇÛÎØúÔÛÆÛÎÓ ïÇÏÏÓØÓÆÛÊÛÌÇ éÍÇÈÔèÛÎÈÛÇûìî ê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ëÇÓÈÙÐÛÓÏø××Ø ïÛÌ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊ×Î×ÅÛÐÍÖÚÓÎÕÍÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÖÍÊéÈòÍÉ×ÌÔÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ùÔÇÊÙÔÛÎØùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍé×ÎÓÍÊù×ÎÈ×ÊùÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÎÕùÍÇÎÙÓÐ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ éÈòÍÉ×ÌÔùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÔÇÊÙÔÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍé×ÎÓÍÊù×ÎÈ×ÊùÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÎÕùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ûÚÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÎÇÓÉÛÎÙ×Å××ØÉÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐùÍØ×ùÔÛÌÈ×Ê ÛÎØê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎîÍ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ å××ØûÚÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÕÊÛÏùÍÏÏ×ÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈ ê×ÌÍÊÈ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍå××ØûÚÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÕÊÛÏéÙÔ×ØÇÐ× ûÌÌÊÍÆ×Øê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎîÍ ïÓØã×ÛÊÚÇØÕ×ÈÛØÒÇÉÈÏ×ÎÈ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÓØã×ÛÊùÛÌÓÈÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÕÊÛÏùóìê×ÆÓ×ÅÛÎØ éÈÛÈÇÉê×ÌÍÊÈ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ùóìéÌÊ×ÛØÉÔ××È éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÊÍÒ×ÙÈìÔÛÉ×óó éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐùÍØ×ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉÈÍÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ôÍÇÉÓÎÕ÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈ ïùû ïùû AGENDA CUPERTINOCITYCOUNCIL ~ REGULARADJOURNEDMEETING CUPERTINOREDEVELOPMENTAGENCY ~ REGULARMEETING 10350TorreAvenue,CommunityHallCouncilChamber Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:00PM CITYCOUNCILMEETING PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE – 3:00PM ROLLCALL CLOSEDSESSION 1.Subject:ConferencewithRealPropertyNegotiator(Gov'tCode54956.8);Property:10346 ScenicBlvd.Cupertino,CA 95014;Negotiator:CarolAtwood;Under negotiation:terms RecommendedAction:Provide directionto negotiator Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet 2.Subject:Conferencewithlegalcounsel-Significantexposuretolitigation-(Threecases) Gov'tCode 54956.9(b) RecommendedAction:N/A Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet 3.Subject:ConferencewithRealPropertyNegotiator(Gov'tCode54956.8;Property:10800 TorreAve,Cupertino,CA95014;NegotiatingParties:CityofCupertinoandpotential lessees;UnderNegotiation:Lease- priceandterms of payment RecommendedAction:N/A Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet CEREMONIALMATTERS – PRESENTATIONS 4.Subject:DeclareJanuary 2011 to beNationalBloodDonor Month RecommendedAction:PresentproclamationtotheAmericanRedCross,Northern CaliforniaBloodServicesRegion Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet January 18, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency POSTPONEMENTS – ItemNo. 15 continuedtoFebruary 1 WRITTENCOMMUNICATIONS ORALCOMMUNICATIONS Thisportionofthemeetingisreservedforpersonswishingtoaddressthecouncilonanymatter notontheagenda.Speakersarelimitedtothree(3)minutes.Inmostcases,Statelawwill prohibitthecouncilfrommakingany decisionswithrespecttoamatter notlisted on theagenda. CONSENTCALENDAR Unlessthereareseparatediscussionsand/oractionsrequestedbycouncil,stafforamemberof the public,itisrequestedthatitems undertheConsentCalendar beacted on simultaneously. 5.Subject:December 7 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes Draft Minutes Page: 8 6.Subject:December 21 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes Draft Minutes Page: 16 7.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 31, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-004 DraftResolution Page: 24 8.Subject:PhaseIV ofthe EmployeeWellnessProgram RecommendedAction:ApproveadditionalproposedenhancementstotheEmployee WellnessProgram StaffReport WellnessProgramComponents WellnessSurveyResults Page: 27 9.Subject:ChangestotheSelection ofClassificationthatreceiveAutomobileAllowance RecommendedAction: EliminateAutomobileAllowancefor selectedclassifications StaffReport Page: 32 January 18, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency 10.Subject:AnimalsinDisasterAnnextoCupertino EmergencyPlan RecommendedAction:ApproveasanAnnextotheCupertino EmergencyPlan Description:DocumentaddressesCupertino’sroleincaringfordisplacedpetsandstray animalsfollowingamajoremergencywhentheCity’sAnimalControlServiceis overwhelmed StaffReport AnimalDisasterAnnex Page: 34 11.Subject:FeewaiverforSt.Joseph’sCatholicSchoolAthletic Teams RecommendedAction:Denyfeewaiverrequest StaffReport Attachment A Page: 55 12.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,StevenA. BreinbergandDannaS.Breinberg, 10625 CordovaRoad,APN 342-22-103 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-005 Description:ThepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCity therighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property Resolution QuitclaimDeed Map Page: 58 13.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,RamanV. MummidivarapuandBhavani Mummidivarapu, 10134 South Tantau,APN 375-07-038 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-006 Description:ThepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCity therighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property Resolution QuitclaimDeed Map Page: 66 ITEMSREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTCALENDAR(above) PUBLICHEARINGS 14.Subject:AnnualrenewalofbingopermitsforSt.JosephofCupertinoChurchandCupertino SeniorCenterCoordinatingCouncil RecommendedAction:Conduct public hearingandrenew permits StaffReport StJosephCupertinoChurchapplication CupertinoSeniorCenterCoordinatingCouncil Page: 72 January 18, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency 15.Subject:GreenBuildingOrdinance RecommendedAction:ContinuetoFebruary 1 Description:Application:MCA-2010-04;Applicant:CityofCupertino;Location:Citywide; ApplicationSummary: MunicipalCodeAmendmenttoadoptaGreenBuildingOrdinance Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet UNFINISHEDBUSINESS NEWBUSINESS 16.Subject:Abatementofapublicnuisance(weeds)pursuanttoprovisionsofCupertino MunicipalCodeChapter 9.08 andResolutionNo. 10-224 RecommendedAction:Note protest(s)andadoptResolutionNo. 11-007 StaffReport DraftResolution 2011WeedAbatementProgramCommencementReport City ofCupertinoWeedAbatementProgramSchedule ApprovedResolutionNo. 10-224 Page: 81 17. Mid-YearOperatingandCapital budgetreview: a.Subject: Mid-Year budgetadjustment RecommendedAction:Approvemid-year budgetadjustment StaffReport Page: 105 b.Subject: Mid-YearCapitalImprovementProgram(CIP)ReviewandStatusReport RecommendedAction:DirectstafftoproceedwiththeCIPascurrentlyapproved,with adjustmentstothe programto be proposed duringtheannual budgetreviewin spring, 2011 StaffReport CIPSpreadsheet Page: 108 c.Subject:StevensCreekCorridorProject,PhaseII RecommendedAction: 1.Authorize stafftoinitiatethe designeffortforAlternative 4A 2.AuthorizetheCityManagertonegotiateandexecuteanamendmentwithSSA LandscapeArchitectsfor design services nottoexceed $200,000 3.AuthorizetheCityManagertoissueLettersofIntenttovariousgrantingagencies clarifyingtheCity’sintentto proceedwithAlternative 4Aandcreekrestoration 4.Authorize stafftoinitiateanenvironmentalclearance processforthe project StaffReport Page: 114 January 18, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency ORDINANCES 18.Subject: MunicipalCodeamendmentsto beconsistentwiththe 2007-2014Housing Element RecommendedAction:Conduct secondreadingandadoptOrdinanceNo. 11-2073 Description:MunicipalCodeAmendments(MCA-2010-06)toChapter19.48(Planned Development(P)Ordinance),Chapter19.72(PrivateRecreation(PF)ZoneOrdinance), Chapter19.124(PlannedDevelopmentPermits,ConditionalUsePermitsandVariances Ordinance)andChapter20.04(SpecificPlansOrdinance)oftheCupertinoMunicipalCode tobeconsistentwiththe2007-2014HousingElement;"AnOrdinanceoftheCityCouncilof theCityofCupertinoamendingtoChapter19.48(PlannedDevelopment(P)zones),Chapter 19.72(PrivateRecreation(FP)zone),Chapter19.124(PlannedDevelopmentPermits, ConditionalUsePermitsandVariances)andChapter20.04(SpecificPlans)oftheCupertino MunicipalCodeto beconsistentwiththe 2010 Housing Element" MCA-2010-06 secondreading MCA-2010-06PlannedDevelopment Page: 120 STAFFREPORTS COUNCILREPORTS ADJOURNMENT REDEVELOPMENTAGENCYMEETING Canceledforlack of business. TheCityofCupertinohasadoptedtheprovisionsofCodeofCivilProcedure§1094.6;litigation challengingafinaldecisionoftheCityCouncil/RedevelopmentAgencymustbebroughtwithin90days aftera decisionisannounced unlessa shortertimeisrequired byState orFederallaw. Anyinterestedperson,includingtheapplicant,priortoseekingjudicialreviewofthecitycouncil’s decisionwithrespecttoquasi-judicialactions,mustfirstfileapetitionforreconsiderationwiththecity clerkwithintendaysafterthecouncil’sdecision.Anypetitionsofiledmustcomplywithmunicipal ordinancecode §2.08.096. IncompliancewiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA),theCityofCupertinowillmake reasonableeffortstoaccommodatepersonswithqualifieddisabilities.Ifyourequirespecialassistance, pleasecontactthecityclerk’s officeat 408-777-3223atleast 48 hoursinadvance ofthemeeting. AnywritingsordocumentsprovidedtoamajorityoftheCupertinoCityCouncilafterpublicationofthe packetwillbemadeavailableforpublicinspectionintheCityClerk’sOfficelocatedatCityHall,10300 TorreAvenue,duringnormalbusinesshoursandinCouncilpacketarchiveslinkedfromthe agenda/minutes page on theCupertinoweb site. DRAFTMINUTES CUPERTINOCITYCOUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday,December 7, 2010 PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE At6:45p.m.MayorKrisWangcalledtheregularmeetingtoorderintheCouncilChamber, 10350 TorreAvenue,Cupertino,California,andledthePledge ofAllegiance. ROLLCALL Present:MayorKrisWang,Vice-MayorGilbertWong,andCouncilmembersBarryChang, Orrin Mahoney,and MarkSantoro.Absent: none. MayorKrisWangacknowledged several peopleinattendance,includingthefollowing: x StateControllerJohnChiang x DistrictDirectorJohnKesslerrepresentingAssemblymanPaulFong x SantaClaraCountySupervisorLizKniss x CupertinoUnifiedHighSchoolDistrictBoardmemberBenLao x BerryessaSchoolDistrictBoardtrusteeLindaChan x SanJoseCityCommunityCollegeBoardtrusteeRandyOkamura x formerSunnyvale MayorJohnHall x formerCupertino Mayor MichaelChang x SantaClaraCountyBoard of Educationtrustee x SantaClaraValleyWaterDistrict 5 Director x formerCupertino MayorPatrickKwok x formerCaliforniaAssemblymemberJimCunneen x DeputyConsulGeneralofChineseConsulateGeneralinSanFrancisco MaoQingwen x ShealsoannouncedTaipeiEconomicandCulturalOffice(TECO)representativeDeputy DirectorWangandStateSenatorJoeSimitianwerealsoexpectedtoarrive shortly. x MarkLinderintroducedthenewPublicWorksDirectorTimmBordenwhoformerly servedastheDeputyPublicWorksDirectorfortheCity ofSanJose. CLOSEDSESSION -None POSTPONEMENTS- None December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 2 CEREMONIALMATTERS – PRESENTATIONS -None ELECTIONOFMAYORANDVICEMAYOR 1.Subject:Councilmemberselect MayorandVice Mayor. WangmovedtoelectGilbertWongtothepositionofMayor.Changseconded,andthe motioncarried unanimously. WangmovedtoelectMarkSantorotothepositionofViceMayor.Mahoneyseconded,and themotioncarried unanimously. 2.Subject: MayorandVice Mayortake oath of office. Discussion:StateControllerJohnChiangextendedhisholidaywishestotheCouncil.He thankedMayorWangforherservicethispastyeardespiteeconomicchallengesfortheState ofCalifornia. Action:Mr.ChiangadministeredtheoathofofficetoMayorWong,andsaidhelooked forwardtoacollaborativeworkingrelationshipinthefuture. Discussion:SantaClaraCountySupervisorLizKnissspokehighlyaboutherlongwork historywithMr.Santoroandrecalledworkingwith himwhen hewasayoung scientistatSun Microsystems.ShesaidthatViceMayorSantorowillhaveanimportantjobsupportingthe MayorWongandfillinginasacting Mayorwhen necessary. Action: Ms. KnissadministeredtheOath ofOfficetoVice Mayor MarkSantoro. MayorWongpresentedaplaquetoCouncilmemberWanginrecognitionofherserviceas Mayor,andalsopresentedanengravedglassleafingratitudeforherenvironmentalefforts. HesaidCouncilmemberWanghasbeenarolemodeltogirlsandwomeninCupertino. CouncilmemberWanginvitedhersontocomeuponstageandsaidhewasalwaysher biggestsupporter.MayorWong’stwodaughtersandnephewpresentedhimwithabouquet offlowers. ActingCityManagerMarkLinderpresentedadeskpensettoCouncilmemberWangon behalfoftheCupertinoemployeesforinspiringcommunitythroughleadership.Hepraised herintellect,senseofsocialjustice,persistenceinsustainability,supportforCitystaff,and recognitionofCityManagerKnapp’s10yearsofservice.CouncilmemberWangthankedthe audiencefortheirsupportthispastyearwhilesheservedasMayor,aswellasthelastseven yearssheservedtheCouncil.Shetalkedaboutthechallengesofworkingwithinthecurrent economicclimate,managingcutbacks,theimportanceofmaintainingthegreenprogram,and remarked on agreatCity staffandthemanyaccomplishments oftheyear. December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 3 4.Subject: Members oftheaudienceareinvitedto speak Discussion:ThefollowingindividualsofferedtheirthankstoformerMayorKrisWang, andcongratulated MayorGilbertWongandVice Mayor MarkSantoro. DeputyConsulGeneralofChineseConsulateGeneralinSanFrancisco,MaoQingwen offeredcongratulationstoMayorWongandViceMayorSantoroandpresenteda proclamationtothe Mayorfor hiswillingnessto supporttheChinesecitizens ofCupertino. Taipei EconomicandCulturalOffice(TECO)representativeDeputyDirectorWang presenteda proclamationto MayorWong,acknowledgingtheCity ofCupertino’s contributionin promotingtheHsinchuSisterCityrelationshipwith TaiwanROC.He thankedcouncilmemberWangfor her service. CupertinoChamber ofCommercePresidentLinChingand boardmembersKevin McClellandandJohnCirelli presentedcouncilmemberWangwitha bouquet offlowers, offeringcongratulationsfor herworkas Mayorandextendedthanksfor hercontinued support oftheChamber. Mrs.Chingalso presenteda bouquet offlowersto MayorWongfor hisyears ofwork on theChamberBoard, hiscontinued support oftheChamber,andto welcome himasthe new Mayor. MayorWongacknowledgedAviKottsformerFremontUnionHighSchoolDistrictand BruceSwensonFoothillDeAnzaCommunityCollegeDistrictfortheir presenceinthe audience. MaheshNihalani,JewelsinStyleandRamGopal,CupertinoBakery presented MayorWong andCouncilmemberWangeachwithacakeinappreciation oftheir service. They offered thankstoCouncilmemberWangfor hercommunityleadershipandyears offriendshipand offered supporttoincoming MayorWong. TheyalsocongratulatedVice Mayorincoming Vice MayorSantoroandremarked oftheiryears offriendship. Resident MichaelGottwald CupertinoPlanningCommissioner Marty Miller PublicSafetyCommissionChairDanielNguyen CindyChang, on behalf ofagroup offriends, presented outgoingCouncilmemberWang witha bouquet offlowersandacake. SantaClaraValleyWaterDistrictDirectorandformerCupertino MayorPatrickKwok SantaClaraCountyBoardSupervisorLizKnisspresenteda plaquetoCouncilmemberWang inrecognition of herworkas Mayorand praisedtheirworkingrelationship overtheyears. December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 4 MaoQingwen,DeputyConsulGeneralofChineseConsulateGeneralinSanFrancisco, presentedaproclamationtoCouncilmemberWang,recognizingherlongtimecommitment andsupportofpromotingfriendshipbetweenChinaandtheUnitedStates,particularly Cupertino. MayorWongremarkedthatitwas honorand privilegeto beelected by his peers.Hethanked hisfamilyandacknowledged hisfriendsandfamilymemberswhowereintheaudience.He discussed his prideinCupertino,whichwasawonderfulcommunityforfamilies becauseit includeda strongtechnology sector,many parks&facilities,a highrate of volunteerism,and highranking schoolsandLibrary.HethankedtheCouncilandtheCupertinoStafffortheir supportaswell. 3.Subject:Comments byCouncilmembersand new Mayor TheCouncilmemberscongratulatedMayorWongandthankedformerMayorWangforher service. FormerMayorWangcongratulatedthenewofficersandsaidshewashappyforthenewteam andlookedforwardtoanotheryear.ShethankedtheCouncilandCitystafffortheirhard workand supportthis pastyear. 5.Subject: The publicisinvitedtoattendareceptioninthelobby MayorWongintroducedthemembers oftheFar EastDragonLionDanceAssociation (FEDLDA),who performedatraditionalChinese dancein honor oftheceremony. RECESS : TheCouncilrecessedfrom 7:56 p.m.to 8:43 p.m.toattendthereception. WRITTENCOMMUNICATIONS CityClerkKimberlySmithdistributedacopyofthestaffPowerPointforitemNo.17,arequest forafive-yearextension of permitsissuedfor 10100 North TantauAvenue. ORALCOMMUNICATIONS AnnePflagerexpressedconcernovertheproposedopenpitmineatLehighCementPlantand askedtheCounciltotakeastrongstancewithSantaClaraCountytoopposethenewopenpit mine. PhillipPflageralsoaskedCounciltotakeapositionagainstthenewopenpitmine.Mr.Pflager saidtheoriginalmineopenedwhenfewpeoplelivedinthecountybutthepopulationhassince grown.HeaskedtheCitytakeastrongstancetoopposetheopenpitminetoprotectthehealth andwelfare ofCupertinocitizensand valleyresidents. PaulaWallis statedthatLehighisthelargest single polluter ofmercuryinSantaClaraCounty andis violatingtheCleanAirActandits TitleVPermit.Sheexpressedconcern overthe December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 5 CaliforniaRegionalWaterControlBoard’s questioning ofLehigh’s dumpinginPermanente CreekandaskedCouncilforaresolutionagainstLehigh’s vestedrights ofthe EastStorage MaterialArea(EMSA),andrenewal ofits TitleV permit. RhodaFrysaidshewouldliketoseemorecollaborationbetweentheCityanditsvoters.She requestedmorefrequentCouncilmeetingswithshorterdurationssothatresidentscanparticipate more.Shementionedseveralupcomingenvironmentalissuesincludingthenewgreenbuilding ordinance,StevensCreekrestoration,andLehighcement.ShenotedthattheSan JoseGuadalupe Riverisstillpollutedasaresultofmercurymining150yearsago.SherequestedtheCouncilput pressure on theCountyto keepthecommunity healthyand safe. ArturPlonowski said helivesclosetoLehighcement plantandisconcernedabout healthissues duetomercuryexposure.Healso usesthecompostfromtheCitywhichisadjacenttothe plant. Heasked howmuchmercuryandcancer-causing substancesareinthis soil,ifit hasit been measured,andwhetheritwould betested, because hewasconcernedaboutthecontamination of the soil. RodSinksstatedthatLehighisthenumberfourcementplantpolluterintheUnitedStatesand thelimestoneherehasanextrahighmercurypercentage.HesaidthatLehighhasworkedto blockEPAregulationsfromgoingintoeffectwhichwouldreducetheallowableoutputof mercuryfrom 350-700 pounds downto 69-88 pounds. RoyHongsaidLehighhasthreeactivenoticesofviolationsforland,water,andairandhewas incredulousthatthingshadreachedthisstate.Hefelttherewasalevelofantagonismandanger and dysfunction on all sides,and heaskedtheCityCouncilfor helptoresolvethisissue. TimBrandsaidthatadeterminationforLehigh’svestedrightsforthe East MaterialStorageArea (EMSA)couldtakeyears,anduntilthenLehighwillcontinuepilingmaterials.Hequestioned whatwouldhappentotheexistingwasterock.HeaskedtheCitytoincreasetheireffortsto influencetheCounty,andheaskedthatcouncilpassaresolutiontoopposeEMSA,immediately suspendthetemporary permit,andimposefines. CONSENTCALENDAR WangmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovetheitemsontheConsentCalendaras recommended.Ayes:Chang, Mahoney,Santoro,Wang,andWong.Noes:None.Abstain:None. 6.Subject:November 1 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes 7.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingNovember 12, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-219 8.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingNovember 19, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-220 December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 6 9.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingNovember 24, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-221 10.Subject:Payrollfor periodendingNovember 12, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo.10-222 11.Subject:Payrollfor periodendingNovember 24, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-223 12.Subject:Year-endFinancialReportsfor 2009-10 RecommendedAction:AcceptFinancialReportsforfiscalyearendedJune 30, 2010 13.Subject:DeclareweedsanuisanceandsethearingdateofJanuary18forobjectionsto proposedremoval RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-224 14.Subject:AlcoholicBeverageLicense,WholeFoods Market, 20955 StevensCreekBoulevard RecommendedAction:ApproveapplicationforOffSaleGeneral 15.Subject:AlcoholicBeverageLicense,SushiHanaBistro,19068StevensCreekBoulevard (LoreeShoppingCenter) RecommendedAction:ApproveapplicationforOn-SaleBeerandWineforaBonaFide Public EatingPlace 16.Subject:Citizens'OptionforPublicSafety(COPS)Grant RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo.10-225toapprovethe2010-11COPSgrant fundingrequest ITEMSREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTCALENDAR(above) PUBLICHEARINGS 17.Subject:Applicationforafiveyearextensionofpermitsissuedfor10100NorthTantau Avenue RecommendedAction:Considerapprovingafiveyearextensiontoapreviouslyapproved projecttoconstructa 10,582 squarefootretail buildinganda one-level parkinggarage. Description:ApplicationM-2010-06;ApplicantAlannaSchroeder/FourCornersProperties (RocktinoFee,LLC);Location 10100 North TantauAvenue,APN 316-19-061 ApplicationSummary:ModificationtothepreviouslyapprovedUsePermit(U-2007-03), Architectural&SiteApproval(ASA-2007-05),ExceptiontotheHeartoftheCitySpecific Plan(EXC-2007-08),TentativeMap(TM-2007-08),andTreeRemovalPermit(TR-2007-03) forthe purpose ofextendingtheexpiration date oftheapprovalsforfiveyears Discussion:CityClerkKimberlySmithdistributedacopyofthestaffPowerPointforitem No. 17, arequestforafive-yearextension of permitsissuedfor 10100 North TantauAvenue. SeniorPlannerAkiHondaSnellingreviewedthe staffreport. December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 7 Staffexplainedtheextensionrequestwassubmittedwithintherequiredtimeframebut,due toapplicantschedulingconflicts,Councilhasbeenunabletoreviewtheprojectuntilnow. TheprojectwillstillbecompliantwiththecurrentHeartoftheCityPlan;theextension would befromAugust 21 to 2015 fora 5-yearextension. ApplicantBruceBurquehartwithFourCornersPropertiesrepresentingtheownersonTantau Avenue,answeredquestionsandcitedthecurrenteconomicconditionsasthereasonforthe permitextensionrequest.Hehopedtoavoidreapplyingforanewpermitwhichcouldcost $15,000,becauseoftheamountofcapitalalreadyspentonthisprocess,includinghistime andlawyerfees.Heexplainedthatitwasnotfinanciallyviabletokeepredesigning.The applicantdoesnothaveplanstoselltheprojectrightnoworwithinthenextfiveyears becausetheywould not beabletorecoverwhatthey originally paidforthe property. MayorWong openedthe public hearingat 9:25 p.m. JenniferGriffinsaidwhenthisprojectwasfirstheardin2007theneighborhoodwas concernedaboutthepotentialremovalofmanytreesalongStevensCreekBoulevard.She askedthatCouncilretainasmanytreesaspossible,retainthe“porkchop”topreventcut- throughtraffic,andretainthe high-tech usesinthis project. The public hearingwasclosedat 9:32 p.m. Action:WangmovedandChangsecondedtoapproveathree-yearextensionofpermitsfor 10100NorthTantauAvenuepursuanttothePlanningCommission’srecommendationandall otherconditionsasrecommendedbythePlanningCommission.Themotioncarried unanimously. UNFINISHEDBUSINESS -None NEWBUSINESS 18.Subject:PossiblechangetoCityCouncilmeeting schedule RecommendedAction:Considercancellingmeeting ofJanuary 4 Description:Thedecisionisnecessaryatthistimeinordertoaccommodatenewspaper deadlinesforany public hearing notices. Discussion:CityClerkKimberlySmithaskedthattheCityCounciltablethisitem.She explainedthatsincetheagendahadbeenprepared,severalitemsofbusinesshadarisenand that neededto beaddressed on January 4. Action:TheCouncilconcurredtotabletheitem. ORDINANCES 19.Subject:Buildings&ConstructionOrdinance. RecommendedAction:ConductsecondreadingoftheBuildings&ConstructionOrdinance No. 10-2072 December 7, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 8 Description:AnOrdinanceoftheCityCounciloftheCityofCupertinoamendingChapter 16 oftheCupertinoMunicipalCodeandadoptingthe2010CaliforniaBuildingCodeStandards withappendicesandamendmentsthereto Staffsaidthattheminorchangesrequestedbycouncilweremadetotwopartsofthe ordinance,andthatthephrase“aone-timeadditiontoanexistingbuildingthatdoesnottotal morethan1000squarefeet…”hasbeenamendedtosay“oneormoreadditionsmadetoa buildingafterJanuary 1, 2011 that do nottotalmorethan 1000 squarefeet of building…” Action:WangmovedandMahoneysecondedtoreadtheordinancebytitleonlyandthatthe CityClerk’sreadingwouldconstitutethesecondreadingthereof.Ayes:Chang,Mahoney, Santoro,Wang,andWong.Noes:None. WangmovedandChangsecondedtoenactOrdinanceNo.10-2072.Ayes:Chang,Mahoney, Santoro,Wang,andWong.Noes:None. STAFFREPORTS 20.Subject:Critzer v. City ofCupertino- updatetoCouncil on status oflitigation RecommendedAction:Receivereport Discussion:ActingCityManagerMarkLinderreportedthatlawsuitisnowfinalizedinthe City’sfavor. TheCouncilreceivedthereport,and no actionwastaken. COUNCILREPORTS Councilmembers highlightedtheactivities oftheircommitteesand variouscommunityevents. ADJOURNMENT At 9:50 p.m.themeetingwasadjourned. ____________________________ KimberlySmith,CityClerk Staffreports,backupmaterials,anditemsdistributedattheCityCouncilmeetingareavailable forreviewattheCityClerk’sOffice,777-3223,andalsoontheInternetatwww.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas& Minutes,thenclick on theappropriatePacket. MostCouncilmeetingsareshownliveonComcastChannel26andAT&TU-verseChannel99 andareavailableatyourconvenienceatwww.cupertino.org.ClickonAgendas&Minutes,then clickArchivedWebcast.VideotapesareavailableattheCupertinoLibrary,ormaybepurchased fromtheCupertinoCityChannel, 777-2364. DRAFTMINUTES CUPERTINOCITYCOUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday,December 21, 2010 PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE At6:45p.m.MayorGilbertWongcalledtheregularmeetingtoorderintheCouncilChamber, 10350 TorreAvenue,Cupertino,California,andledthePledge ofAllegiance. ROLLCALL Present:MayorGilbertWong,Vice-MayorMarkSantoro,andCouncilmembersBarryChang, Orrin Mahoney,andKrisWang.Absent:None. CLOSEDSESSION -None CEREMONIALMATTERS – PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject:ProclamationrecognizingCaptain TerrenceCalderonefor his serviceintheCity Action: MayorGilbertWong presentedthe proclamation 2.Subject:ProclamationcommendingCupertinoHighSchoolStudentsTobiasChisupShinand AndrewYoonforassistingtheSantaClaraCountySheriff’sOfficeintheresolutionofa bankrobbery Action: MayorGilbertWong presentedthe proclamation POSTPONEMENTS -None WRITTENCOMMUNICATIONS DeputyCityClerkGraceSchmidt distributedthefollowingwrittencommunications: x ForitemNo. 10, the draftleasewiththeCoffeeSociety x ForitemNo. 11, LehighCement East MaterialsStorageArea(EMSA): x EmailfromSusanSievertinfavor ofaresolutioncondemningthe handling ofthe EMSA x EmailsfromBenCooperandinfavorofstoppingtheproposednewopenpitmineand stopping ongoing violations x LetterdatedNovember10,2010fromformerMayorKrisWangwithinformationabout upcoming hearings December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 2 ORALCOMMUNICATIONS MayorWongannouncedthatonatrialbasis,theagendawouldbere-orderedtomovetheOral Communicationssectiontotheendofthemeetinganytimethereweremorethanfiverequeststo speak.Healsostatedthatallspeakersfromthepubliconanyitemontheagendawouldbe limitedtotwominutesinsteadofthree,inviewofthenumberofpotentialspeakersandthe increasinglength ofCouncilmeetings. CityAttorneyCarolKoradenotedthatStatelawestablishestherightofthepublictospeak,and themayor hasthe prerogativeto setthetimelimit. CathyHelgersonmentionedanarticleinaSan Jose paperregarding 35 cities,includingSanJose, beingtestedforchromium6inthewater.ThearticlenotedthatCaliforniaproposedsettinga publichealthgoallimitof0.06partsperbillionontheamountofchromiumthatcouldbeinthe water.Ms.Helgersonsaidthataccordingtothe2009CalWaterreport,thelevelofchromiumin thewaterwasat6.3.Sheexplainedthatduetothetoxinsintheair,water,andsoil,hercancer camebackinadifferentform.ShesaidthatLehighCement,theStevensCreekQuarry,andthe AppleComputerfacilityonBandleyDriveweretheculpritsofallthepollution.Sheasked CounciltodosomethingaboutthecompaniesandtohelpstopthepollutioninCupertino.She distributedcopies oftheSanJosearticle. CONSENTCALENDAR WangmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovetheitemsontheConsentCalendaras recommended,withtheexceptionofItemNo.8whichwaspulledfordiscussion.Ayes:Chang, Mahoney,Santoro,Wang,andWong.Noes:None.Abstain:None. 3.Subject:November 16 andNovember 29 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes 4.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 3, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-226 5.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 10, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-227 6.Subject:Payrollfor periodendingDecember 10, 2010 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo.10-228 7.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,HungwenLiand Hung-YingLi, 10450 AnnArborAvenue RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 10-229 December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 3 ITEMSREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTCALENDAR(above) 8.Subject:ReviewopportunitiesforfuturedevelopmentontheHewlettPackard(HP)campus locatedintheNorthVallcoPark MasterPlanArea RecommendedAction:TablethisitemuntilsuchtimethenewpropertyownersoftheHP campusintheNorthVallcoAreaarereadytopresenttheirplansforfuturedevelopmentto theCity Discussion:CouncilmemberChangaskedwhetheranyofthe$25,000thatCouncilapproved topayforaconsultanttolookintotheHPpropertyhadbeenspent.EconomicDevelopment DirectorKellyKlinesaidthatstaffisrecommendingthatthisitembetabled,sonofunds wouldbeexpended.ChangalsonotedthathehadcontactedAppleComputerasanindividual CouncilmemberlettingthemknowthatCouncilwouldtrytohelpthembesuccessfulinthe newcampus. CathyHelgersonsaidthatshewasconcernedaboutAppleComputermovingtotheHPsite andsheaskedtohavethebuildingremovedimmediatelybecauseitcausedherfamily’s cancer.SheaskedCounciltodosomethingaboutthepollutioncomingfromAppleandnoted thatthe pollutioncontainsan unregulatedtoxicelement. ChangmovedandMahoneysecondedtotablethisitemasrecommended.Themotioncarried unanimously. PUBLICHEARINGS -None UNFINISHEDBUSINESS -None NEWBUSINESS 9.Subject:ConsideraLibraryCommission proposaltoestablishaPoetLaureateforCupertino RecommendedAction:AdoptresolutionNo.10-230designatingaCupertinoPoetLaureate, andrequestthattheLibraryCommissionappointaselectioncommitteetooverseeand administerthe program Description:ThePoetLaureate'sresponsibilitieswouldbetostimulateculturalandliteracy awarenessandtoreinforcethe benefits of poetrytothecommunity Discussion:LibraryCommissionChairmanRonMillercongratulatedthenewMayorand ViceMayor.HesaidthatlastAugust,formerMayorWangchallengedthecommissionsto findawaytomakeCupertinoabetterplacetolive.TheFineArtsandLibraryCommissions areaskingCounciltoestablishaPoetLaureate.HeintroducedmembersfromtheProvisional CupertinoPoetLaureateSelectionCommittee,notingthatthenameswerelistedinthe Councilpacket.HealsoreadanexcerptfromabookbyLaurenMerritttitle,TheHeartofan Engineer. Action:MahoneymovedandWangsecondedtoadoptResolutionNo.10-230.Themotion carried unanimously. December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 4 10.Subject:CoffeeSocietyLease RecommendedAction:AuthorizetheCityManagertoexecuteathreeyearleasewiththe CoffeeSociety Discussion:PublicWorksDirectorTimmBordenreviewedthestaffreport.Councilnoted sometyposintheleaseand staff saidthattheywouldmakethosecorrections. Action:WangmovedandMahoneysecondedtocontinuethisitemtothemeetingof January 4to havetimetoreviewthelease. Themotioncarried unanimously. RECESS- Councilrecessedfrom 7:30 p.m.to 7:40 p.m. 11.Subject:LehighCement East MaterialsStorageArea(EMSA) RecommendedAction:Considerwhatletterorresolution,ifany,theCityCouncilmaywish tosendtotheSantaClaraCountyBoardofSupervisorsregardingLehighCementEast MaterialsStorageArea(EMSA) Discussion:MayorWongremindedtheaudiencethattheyhaveuptotwominutestospeak onanyagendaitem or underOralCommunications. TheCityAttorneynotedthatStatelawestablishestherightofthepublictospeak,butitdoes notestablishanytimelimit.Theagendastatesthatspeakersmayspeakuptothreeminutes, andthemayor hasthe prerogativetochangetheamount oftime. CityManagerDavidKnappintroducedtheitem,notingthatthiswassomethingCouncil askedtobeputontheagenda.PublicandEnvironmentalAffairsDirectorRickKitsonsaid thatstaffhasaccumulatedapproximately44differentreportsaboutthesubject,rangingfrom theStateMiningandReclamationActandcompliancetotrafficandothermitigations.He notedthatanymaterialreceivedfromanyoftheregulatoryagencieshasbeenpostedonthe City’swebsiteatwww.cupertino.org/lehigh.Heexplainedthatthematerialislistedin chronologicalorderandbrokenoutbysubjectarea,datingbackto2007.Healsonotedthat thatsinceLehighisnotundertheCity’sjurisdiction,staffisnotfact-checkingany documents receivedfromany oftheregulatoryagencies.Heanswered questionsfromCouncil. PlantManagerofLehighQuarryandCementPlantHenrikWesselingsaidthattheyare proud toprovidelocalbuildingmaterialsforCupertino,SantaClara,andtheBayareaforover70 years bycomplyingwiththemoststringentenvironmentalrulesandregulations.He explainedthatthefocustonightisontheeastmaterialsstoragearea(EMSA)andthatthey havereceivedsupportfrommanyoftheneighbors.HenotedthatLehighdoeshaveaTitleV permit. MarvinHowell,DirectorofLandUsePlanningandPermittingforLehigh’sWestRegion, saidthattheyhavethreegoalsfortheEMSA:1)Amendtheexistingreclamationplanto includetheEMSAwithinitsboundaries;2)Enhancethebiologicalvalueofthe89-acre parcel;and3)Improveviewslookingtowardstheindustrialfacilityfromthevalleyfloor.He December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 5 explainedthatnothingintheapplicationexpandstheexistingquarryorprovidesforasingle acreofnewexcavationanywhereonthe3500acres.HenotedthattheEMSAhasbeena storageareaformorethan70yearsandtheprojectprovidesforthereplantingand reclamationofstockpilearea;biologicalanalysishasshownthattheprojectwillresultina muchbetterhabitatthanwhatexiststheretoday.Heshowedaphotofrom1940ofthe beginningofthestockpileandwhatthearealooksliketoday,notingthatthestockpileareais indistinguishableandthatthecurrentplanwouldbeevenbettersincenativeplantswouldbe used.Heshowedphotorepresentationsofwhattheprojectwouldlooklikein5,10,and20 yearsandexplainedtheprojectwouldbedevelopedinthreephases,withreplantingaseach phaseiscomplete.Hesaidthattheprojectwouldtakeabout5yearstocompleteand everythingassociatedwiththeconstructionoftheEMSAwillbecoveredbytheCounty’s EnvironmentalImpactReport(EIR). Mr.Wesselingand Mr.Howellanswered questionsfromCouncil. Councilrecessedfrom 8:13 p.m.to 8:20 p.m. Thefollowingindividuals spoke on thistopic: Saneev Mahalawat PhilPflager AnnePflager AshleyCushmanrepresentingagrassroots organizationforcleanairandlong health Amy Migdal Michael Enescu MichelleBazargun TeriWiss KellyHsiao FrankGeefy RhodaFry JustinFry EmilyKinnerrepresentingDeAnzaCollege students VictorArredondorepresenting students,residents,and veterans LeighStevens Don-Min Tsou SoeunPark Gary Ettinger KiyoOuchida NahuiQuetzelcoat CathyHelgerson RodSinks AlexSakhanyuk KarenDelCompare NadineGrant KristalCaidoy Kevin McClellandrepresentingtheChamber ofCommerce December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 6 TimBrand–distributedcopyofExecutiveOfficer’sreportfromStateMining&Geology BoardfortheCity’swebsiteandmaps showingthearea CraigLee RichardAdler–distributedcopyofdraftEMSAresolutionanddocumentfromtheUS EnvironmentalProtectionAgency RonYu BillAlmon LynFaust DavidRussell BrettAlten,attorneywithAppleComputer FarroAgdassi Chris Toomey ChrisPribe JohnBartas Bill Erdman Thorsten von Stein Marylin McCarthy ConnieFrenzel,ActingPresidentoftheAutismSocietyandformerSantaClaraCounty publichealthnurse–distributedasummarycomparisonofcharacteristicsofautismand mercury poisoning LilyLim ShaniKleinhaws PatriciaRod BrianFranklin PaulaWallis RoyHong RobinClaassen JohnsonLau Theircommentsincluded:concernsabouttheproximityoftheplanttoresidents,visual aesthetics,traffic,noise,toxicdust,andairandwaterpollutionfrommercuryandchromium toxins;urgedCounciltosendaresolutionorlettertotheCountystronglysupporting enforcementofallregulationsandappropriatefines;againstvestedrights;takeaproactive stepinmakingbuildingmaterialsmoregreen;encouragedresidentstotalktotheCountyand theregulatingagenciesdirectly;urgedresidentstovisitthequarryandseethestoragearea personally. Councilrecessedfrom 10:06 p.m.to 10:24 p.m. Council discussedtheissueandasked questions of staff. Action: Mahoneymovedthefollowing:(1)SendalettertotheCountywiththefollowing talking points:report outwhatwas heardtonight bytheresidents; howmany people spoke; thelevel ofconcern oftheresidents;encouragetheCountytolookat upcoming healthand safetyissuesina seriousmanner;and dealwiththoseissuesinanexpeditiousfashion;(2) December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 7 Ratifyformer MayorWang’sletter ofNovember 10;and(3)and sendacopy oftheletterto alltheregulatoryagencies.Santoro seconded butwithdrew his secondaftermore discussion. Changmovedto sendthe draftedresolutiontotheCounty;itwould bereviewed bytheCity Attorneyandcome backforCouncilapproval. Themotion diedforlack ofa second. Mahoneymovedthe samemotionas before:(1)SendalettertotheCountywiththe followingtalking points:report outwhatwas heardtonight bytheresidents; howmany people spoke;thelevel ofconcern oftheresidents;encouragetheCountytolookat upcoming healthand safetyissuesina seriousmanner;and dealwiththoseissuesinan expeditiousfashion;(2)Ratifyformer MayorWang’sletter ofNovember 10;and(3)and sendacopy ofthelettertoalltheregulatoryagencies.Wang secondedfor purposes of discussion. Wangmadeafriendlyamendmentto notethatthe purpose oftheletterwasto strongly urge theCountySupervisorstolookintotheissueinatimelymanner;withthe number one message beingto showa strong stance,andthattheletterrepresentstheentirecommunity. Mahoneyacceptedthefriendlyamendment. Themotioncarried 4-1withChang voting no. ORDINANCES -None STAFFREPORTS Councilagreedtocallaspecialmeetingat6:30p.m.onJanuary4todiscusstheCoffeeSociety lease. CouncilagreedtostarttheJanuary18meetingat3:00p.m.inordertohavetimetoreviewthe mid-year budgetadjustment. COUNCILREPORTS CouncildiscussedreconsideringthevoteonItemNo.11regardingtheLehighletterandasked theCityAttorneytoexplainthe process. CraigLeesaidthatcountlesslettershavesentandthatthislettercouldbememorializedasa resolutionaskingtheCountytolookat healthand safetyissues. BillAlmonurgedCounciltobecarefulsincemanypeoplewhospokeearlierhadalreadyleft knowingwhatthefirstvotewasandthereisalreadylackofconfidenceandworryaboutthis issue. WangmovedandChangsecondedtoreconsiderre-votingItemNo.11onthepriormotion withoutchange. Themotioncarried unanimously. December 21, 2010CupertinoCityCouncilPage 8 MahoneymovedandWangsecondedtorevoteItemNo.11onthepriormotionassummarized intotalkingpointsbytheCityClerkandtobewrittenbythePublicandEnvironmentalAffairs Director. Themotioncarried unanimously. CouncilcontinuedwithCouncilreportsandhighlightedtheactivitiesoftheircommitteesand variouscommunityevents. ADJOURNMENT At 12:35a.m. on Wednesday,December 22, themeetingwasadjournedtoJanuary 4 at 6:30 p.m. ____________________________ GraceSchmidt,DeputyCityClerk Staffreports,backupmaterials,anditemsdistributedattheCityCouncilmeetingareavailable forreviewattheCityClerk’sOffice,777-3223,andalsoontheInternetatwww.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas& Minutes,thenclick on theappropriatePacket. MostCouncilmeetingsareshownliveonComcastChannel26andAT&TU-verseChannel99 andareavailableatyourconvenienceatwww.cupertino.org.ClickonAgendas&Minutes,then clickArchivedWebcast.VideotapesareavailableattheCupertinoLibrary,ormaybepurchased fromtheCupertinoCityChannel, 777-2364. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject PhaseIV ofthe EmployeeWellnessProgram RecommendedAction Approveadditional proposedenhancementstothe EmployeeWellnessProgram Description In2007,theCityadoptedaWellnessProgramtopromoteemployeehealthandreduceour currentandfuturemedicalcostsforfull-timeemployees.Programcomponentsareoutlinedin AttachmentAandrewardemployeesforschedulinganannualphysicalandkeyhealthscreening tests,keepingcholesterolandglucoselevelswithina“healthyrange”andparticipatingin exerciseprograms.Inaddition,wesurveyparticipationannuallytoidentifyourmosteffective programcomponents.(AttachmentB) Thisyear,weare proposingadditionalenhancementstothe program: x HealthLeaveBank- Additional health bankcredits(upto 4 hoursmaximum): Mammogram – one hour(currently ½ hour) o PSA Test – one hour(currently ½ hour) o OBGYN Exam – one hour o BloodPressurecheckandreadingwithin“healthyrange” – ½ hour o Participationinaformalweightlossprogram(WeightWatchers;Nutri-systems, o etc.) – two hours Attendanceinaformalno-smoking program – two hours o AttendanceofBrownBagwellnesstopic sessions – ½ hour per session o x SafeHouse/Don’tdriveprogram Reimburseemployees $50/nightto providelodgingintheir homestoemployees o who needtoworklateand havea substantial drive homeinconjunctionwith required nightmeetings. FiscalImpact PhaseIVestimatedannualcostisapproximately$600.00.Regularexercise programsandannual check-upscanreducetherisk of heartattackandstroke between 30%and60%respectively.We believetheseenhancementstarget our highriskmedicalareasandthattheresulting benefitswill farexceedthecosts. _____________________________________ Preparedby:CarolAtwood Reviewedby: ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments:WellnessProgramComponents;WellnessSurvey CityofCupertino WellnessProgram ProgramComponents ByFiscalYear Pre 2008 EmployeeAssistanceProgram; AnnualHealthFair,includingmedicalscreeningforglucose,bloodpressureand cholesterol; AnnualFitness Membershipforfull-timeemployeesattheCupertinoSportsCenter; DentalHygiene –Increased dentalcleaningsfromtwotofour peryear; 2009 HealthLeaveBank (oneyearcarryover,useitorloseit).Uptofour(4)hours maximumcreditearnedpercalendaryearforthefollowingactivities: ¾AnnualPhysical – 1 hour; Mammogram – ½ hour;PSAtest – ½ hour rdth ¾DentalVisits – 3cleaning peryear – ½ hour; 4cleaning peryear – ½ hour ¾Workout program – workout 10 timesata health/workoutfacility – 1 hour ¾Participationinacity-sponsoredleague – 2 hourswith 80%attendance ¾HDL/LDLCholesterolratiowithin“healthyrange” – ½ hour ¾Glucosewithin“healthyrange” – ½ hour ¾Bike/walktowork- 10 times- 1 hour Promotewellness as follows : Walking/walkingclub –(lunchtime, before orafterwork) – pedometersforall Dropin summer volleyball – organize once-a-week volleyball Promote non-city organizedweightlosscontests Freeexercisetips Brownbag sessions – various healthtopics Healthyfood potlucks Soft openingforemployeesattheSportsCenter(newequipment) Events surroundingtheNat’lWellnessInstitutesobservancecalendar Other–DistributeawardprograminformationforhealthsurveysfromBlueShieldand others health plan. 2010 AnnualfitnessmembershipforPERSretiredemployeesandcouncilmembersatthe CupertinoSportsCenter. 2011- Proposed HealthLeaveBank: ¾Mammogram – one hour ¾PSA Test – one hour ¾OBGYN Exam – one hour ¾BloodPressurereadingwithin healthyrange – one hour ¾Participationinaformalweightlossprogram(WeightWatchers;Nutri-Systems, etc.) – two hours ¾Participationinaformalno-smoking program – two hours ¾AttendanceofBrownBag sessions – ½ hourpersession Safehouse/Don’tdriveprogram: ¾Reimburseemployees$50/nighttoprovidelodgingintheirhomestoemployees whoneedtoworklateandhaveasubstantialdrivehomeinconjunctionwithCity Councilmeetings. å÷ððî÷éééçêæ÷ã 2010***2009**2008* øÓØÃÍÇÔÛÆ×ÛÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐ×ÄÛÏý YES646763 NO303829 å×Ê×ÃÍÇÊÙÔÍÐ×ÉÈ×ÊÍÐÛÎØÕÐÇÙÍÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÈ×ÉÈ×Øý YES647765 NO302827 öÍÊÅÍÏ×Î ÛÎØÍÆ×ÊØÓØÃÍÇÔÛÆ×ÛÏÛÏÏÍÕÊÛÏý YES192521 NO81110 N/A276961 öÍÊÏ×Î ÛÎØÍÆ×ÊØÓØÃÍÇÔÛÆ×ÛìéûÈ×ÉÈý YES172612 NO132513 N/A165467 ôÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ÉÌ×ÊÅ××ÑØÓØÃÍÇÔÛÆ× ÏÓÎÇÈ×ÉÍÖ ÙÛÊØÓÍÆÛÉÙÇÐÛÊ×Ä×ÊÙÓÉ×ý NONE71012 ONE-TWO293928 THREE-FOUR343331 FIVE+242321 ôÍÅÏÛÎÃØ×ÎÈÛÐÙÐ×ÛÎÓÎÕÉØÓØÃÍÇÔÛÆ×ý ONE8812 TWO455549 THREE251819 FOUR12229 NONE423 Total Employee Responses: *2008 - 92 responses out of 154 employees **2009 - 105 responses out of 150 employees ***2010 - 94 responses out of 149 employees ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject ChangestotheSelectionofClassificationsthatreceiveAutomobileAllowance RecommendedAction EliminateAutomobileAllowancefor selectedclassifications. Description UndertheCityofCupertinoUnrepresented Employees’CompensationProgram,PolicyNo. 4, “AutomobileAllowances& MileageReimbursements”,eligibleemployeesareto be compensatedforthe useof personal vehiclesforCity business. The policylists selectedclassificationstoreceivea specifiedmonthlyallowance,includingtwo classificationsthatarecurrently vacant: ExecutiveAssistanttotheCity Managerat $200.00,and HumanResourcesDirectorat $250.00 (AttachmentA).Because both oftheseclassifications only usetheirpersonalvehiclesforCity business on an occasion basis,itisrecommendedthat these vacantclassifications beremovedfromthelist ofclassificationstoreceiveamonthly AutomobileAllowance.Asanalternative,compensationfor occasional usewill be providedfor throughmileagereimbursement. FiscalImpact This hasthe potential ofsaving up to $650.00 permonth onceall positionsarefilled. _____________________________________ Preparedby:PamelaMullen Reviewed by:CarolAtwood ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments:AutomobileAllowancesand MileageReimbursements(Unrepresented CompensationProgram,PolicyNo. 4) ATTACHMENTA CityofCupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’COMPENSATIONPROGRAM PolicyNo.4 AUTOMOBILEALLOWANCESAND MILEAGEREIMBURSEMENTS ItisCity ofCupertino policythateligible personsunderthisCompensationProgram shall becompensatedfairlyfortheuseofpersonalautomotivevehiclesonCitybusiness.Inmany instancestheuseofpersonalvehiclesisaconditionofemploymentduetotheabsenceof sufficientCityownedvehiclesforgeneraltransportationpurposes.Itisnotintended,however, thatsuchaconditionofemploymentshouldworkanunduehardship.Forthisreason,the following policies shallapplyformileagereimbursements. ThosepersonswhooccasionallyarerequiredtousetheirpersonalautomobilesforCity businessshallbereimbursedforsuchuseatanappropriaterateestablishedbytheCityCouncil. Submission ofreimbursementrequestsmust beapprovedbytheDepartmentHead. Employeesinthefollowingclassificationsshallbepaidonamonthlybasisthefollowing automobileallowance: ClassificationAllowance CityManager $350.00 Director ofAdministrativeServices 300.00 Director ofCommunityDevelopment 300.00 Director ofParksandRecreation 300.00 Director ofPublicWorks 300.00 AssistantDirector ofPublicWorks 250.00 CityClerk 250.00 HumanResourcesDirector 250.00* PublicCommunicationsManager 250.00 CityArchitect 250.00 Traffic Engineer 250.00 RecreationSupervisor 200.00 ExecutiveAssistanttotheCity Manager 200.00* * ExecutiveAssistanttotheCityAttorney 200.00 Employeesreceivingautomobileallowanceshallbeeligibleforreimbursementfortravel thatexceedstwo hundredmilesroundtrip. *Thisallowancewill beeliminated oncethecurrentemployeeis no longerinthe position. AdoptedbyAction oftheCityCouncil April 1, 1974 Revised 7/74, 5/79, 6/80, 7/81, 8/84, 7/87, 1/89, 7/90, 7/92, 6/96, 8/99, 6/00, 9/01, 1/02, 6/02, 10/07, 7/10, 1/11 OFFICEOFTHE CITY CLERK ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject ANIMALS INDISASTERANNEXTOCUPERTINOEMERGENCYPLAN RecommendedAction ApproveasanAnnextotheCupertino EmergencyPlan Description DocumentaddressesCupertino’sroleincaringfor displaced petsand strayanimalsfollowinga majoremergencywhentheCity’sAnimalControlServiceis overwhelmed. TheAnnexis based ontheSantaClaraCountyOperationalArea EmergencyOperationsPlan,AnimalsinDisaster Annex,revised March 17, 2010. TheAnnexwaspreparedbyCupertinoAnimalsinDisaster VolunteersandreviewedbytheCupertinoDisasterCouncilandCupertinoOfficeof Emergency Services. TheAnnexis designed so thatemergencyfunctionsaremanagedbyCupertino’s volunteersand supportedbytheCityEmergencyOperationsCenter. _____________________________________ Preparedby:MarshaHovey Reviewedby:CarolAtwood ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments:AnimalsinDisasterAnnex PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð çì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: January 18, 2011 Subject Fee waiver request Recommended Action Deny the request for a fee waiver. Background for a fee waiver for the use of Jollyman Park as its home field for soccer and flag football. The request is found on Attachment A. The Cupertino Field Use Policy establishes the fees for use of Cupertino parks and Cupertino Union School District fields that are programmed by Parks and Recreation. The Cupertino Field Use Policy is Attachment B to this report. Fees are determined by the number of participants and the residency -resident and 47% resident. Therefore, they fall into the non profit, non-1% or more resident participants, they would be in the non-profit resident category. -resident, non-profit category is $11 per resident participant and $66 per non-resident participant for a total of $1969. The invoice is attached as Attachment , the fee would have been $11 per resident participant and $22 per non- considered in the resident, non-profit category so they can pay the $825 fee. If the fee waiver is granted, the difference between the resident, non-profit category and non-resident fees is $1144. Discussion The Cupertino City Council adopted the Field Use Policy in 2005. The adoption followed eighteen months of meetings involving two Council members, City staff, and representatives of the stakeholder groups that would use the fields. The goals of the policy are: To strive to provide all Cupertino residents with an opportunity to participate in their activity of choice To establish procedures governing the exclusive use of City of Cupertino and Cupertino Union School District playing fields managed by the City of Cupertino. To ensure Cupertino residents have priority access to the fields they have paid for. To provide for a variety of activities reflecting the athletic preferences of Cupertino residents. To grant a proportionate amount of field time to regional organizations that Cupertino residents participate in. To collect reasonable fees for the use of the fields, in order to support their ongoing maintenance. To adopt a fee schedule that rewards volunteerism and community involvement. -resident fee in 2005, but they paid resident fees from 2006-2008. They did not use the field in 2009. The 2010 fee is the non-resident fee. request will have potential impact on our Field Use Policy and on the e: Precedent will be set and other youth sport organizations may feel entitled to bring a waiver request to City Council. If other youth sports groups comprised of over 50% non-resident participants receive a fee waiver and are categorized as resident, non-profit the annual impact to the City is a loss of approximately $100,000. Staff will lack clear direction on how to assess fees for field use. The youth sports organizations of Cupertino currently work very well together and have demonstrated an ability to share the fields. If the groups feel there is preferential treatment given to one or more groups it could disable this collaborative environment. Therefore, staff recommends denying the fee waiver request and assessing the fees that were assigned based on the Cupertino Field Use Policy. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Mark Linder Reviewed by: Donna Henriques Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: RESOLUTIONNO.11- ARESOLUTIONOF THECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO ACCEPTINGQUITCLAIMDEEDANDAUTHORIZATIONFORUNDERGROUND WATERRIGHTS,STEVENA.BREINBERGANDDANNAS.BREINBERG, 10625CORDOVAROAD,APN 342-22-103 WHEREAS,StevenA.BreinbergandDannaS.Breinberg,haveexecuteda“Quitclaim DeedandAuthorization”,whichisingoodandsufficientform,quitclaimingallrightsinand authorizingtheCityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,toextractwater fromtheundergroundbasin,underlyingthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino, more particularly describedasfollows: AllthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,CountyofSanta Clara,State ofCalifornia,as shownintheattached Exhibit“A”. NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityofCupertinoacceptsaid “QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization” so tendered;and ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid “QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”andthisresolution. PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof Cupertinothis 18th day ofJanuary, 2011, bythefollowing vote: VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST:APPROVED: _________________________________________________ CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino Í«¾¶»½¬æ Ï«·¬½´¿·³ Ü»»¼ ¿²¼ ß«¬¸±®·¦¿¬·±² º±® Ë²¼»®¹®±«²¼ É¿¬»® Î·¹¸¬ô Í¬»ª»² ßò Þ®»·²¾»®¹ ¿²¼ Ü¿²²¿ Íò Þ®»·²¾»®¹ô q ïðêîë Ý±®¼±ª¿ Î±¿¼ò Î»½±³³»²¼»¼ ß½¬·±²æ ß¼±°¬ Î»±´«¬·±² Ò±ò ïïóÁÁÁÁÁÁò RESOLUTIONNO.11- ARESOLUTIONOF THECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO ACCEPTINGQUITCLAIMDEEDANDAUTHORIZATIONFORUNDERGROUND WATERRIGHTS,RAMANV. MUMMIDIVARAPUANDBHAVANI MUMMIDIVARAPU, 10134 SOUTH TANTAU,APN 375-07-038 WHEREAS,RamanV.MummidivarapuandBhavaniMummidivarapu,haveexecuteda “QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”,whichisingoodandsufficientform,quitclaimingall rightsinandauthorizingtheCityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,to extractwaterfromtheundergroundbasin,underlyingthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCity ofCupertino,more particularly describedasfollows: AllthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,CountyofSanta Clara,State ofCalifornia,as shownintheattached Exhibit“A”. NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityofCupertinoacceptsaid “QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization” so tendered;and ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid “QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”andthisresolution. PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof Cupertinothis 18th day ofJanuary, 2011, bythefollowing vote: VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST:APPROVED: _________________________________________________ CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino Í«¾¶»½¬æ Ï«·¬½´¿·³ Ü»»¼ ¿²¼ ß«¬¸±®·¦¿¬·±² º±® Ë²¼»®¹®±«²¼ É¿¬»® Î·¹¸¬ô Î¿³¿² Êò Ó«³³·¼·ª¿®¿°« ¿²¼ Þ¸¿ª¿²· Ó«³³·¼·ª¿®¿°«ô ïðïíì Í±«¬¸ Ì¿²¬¿« ßª»²«»ò Î»½±³³»²¼»¼ ß½¬·±²æ ß¼±°¬ Î»±´«¬·±² Ò±ò ïïóÁÁÁÁÁÁò q OFFICEOFTHE CITY CLERK ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject Annualrenewal of bingopermitsforSt.Joseph ofCupertinoChurchandCupertinoSenior CenterCoordinatingCouncil. RecommendedAction Conductthe public hearingandrenewthe permits. Discussion TheCupertinoCoordinatingCouncilandSt.JosephofCupertinoChurchhaveappliedforthe annualrenewaloftheirbingopermitsasrequiredbytheMunicipalCode.Allformsandfees have beenreceived. TheSheriff’sDepartment,CentralFireProtectionDistrict,theCountyHealthOfficer, Cupertino’sChiefBuildingInspectorandDirector ofPlanninghaveapprovedtheapplications. _____________________________________ Preparedby:GraceSchmidt,DeputyCityClerk Reviewedby:KimberlySmith,CityClerk ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: Staffreport ApplicationforSt.Joseph ofCupertinoChurch ApplicationforCupertinoSeniorCenterCoordinatingCouncil OFFICEOFTHE CITY CLERK ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject Abatementofapublicnuisance(weeds)pursuanttoprovisionsofCupertinoMunicipalCode Chapter 9.08 andResolutionNo. 10-224. RecommendedAction Note objectionsandadoptthe draftresolution orderingabatement ofa public nuisance(weeds). Discussion Chapter9.08oftheCupertinoMunicipalCoderequirespropertyownerstoremoveordestroy weedsontheirproperty.Theweedabatement processisinplacetonotifythepropertyownersof thisresponsibility,authorizetheCountytoremovetheweedsifthepropertyownerdoesn’t,and allowtheCountytorecoverthecostsofabatement.Theprocessconsistsofeightstepsthatbegin inNovemberandgothroughAugust ofeachyear.Atthistime,the processisatStep 4. 1.Countypreparesalistofallpropertiesthathavebeennon-compliantinremovingweeds inthelastthreeyearsand providesthatlisttotheCity(Nov). 2.CityCounciladoptsaresolutiondeclaringweedsanuisanceandsettingahearingdateto hear objectionsby property ownersto havingtheir name on thelist(Dec). 3.Countysendsnoticetothepropertyownersonthelistnotifyingthemofthehearingdate andexplainingthattheymustremoveweedsbytheabatementdeadlineofApril15orit willbedoneforthem,andthecostoftheabatementplusadministrativecostsassessedto their property(Dec). 4.CityCouncilholdsthehearingtoconsiderobjectionsbypropertyownersandadoptsa resolution orderingabatement(Jan). 5.AfterApril15,thepropertiesareinspectedbytheCountytoverifythatweedswere removedandproceedswithabatementiftheinspectionfails.Countymakesalistofall costsassociatedwiththeabatementandprovidesthatlisttotheCity(June-July). 6.CityCounciladoptsaresolutionsettingahearingdatetohearobjectionsbyproperty ownersfortheassessedcosts ofweedabatement(July). 7.City notifiestheproperty owners on theassessmentlist notifyingthem ofthe hearing date. 8.CityCouncil holdsa hearing, notesany disputes,andadoptsaresolution puttingalien assessment on the propertiestoallowtheCountytorecoverthecost ofweedabatement (July-Aug). _____________________________________ Preparedby:GraceSchmidt,DeputyCityClerk Reviewedby:KimberlySmith,CityClerk ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: StaffReport DraftResolution 2011WeedAbatementProgramCommencementReport CityofCupertinoWeedAbatementProgramSchedule ApprovedResolutionNo. 10-224 RESOLUTIONNO.11- ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCUPERTINO ORDERINGABATEMENTOFPUBLICNUISANCEPURSUANTTO PROVISIONSOFCUPERTINOMUNICIPALCODECHAPTER 9.08AND RESOLUTIONNO. 10-224 WHEREAS,theCityCouncilhasdeclaredthatthegrowthofweeds,the accumulationofgardenrefuse,cuttingsandothercombustibletrashupontheprivate propertiesasdescribedinResolutionNo.10-224adoptedDecember7,2010,tobea public nuisance;and WHEREAS,afterduenotice,ahearingthereonwasheldattheregularmeeting of theCityCouncil on January 18, 2011;and WHEREAS,fromtheevidencepresented,bothoralandwritten,itappearstobe inthe bestinterests oftheCitytoacquirejurisdiction overandabate saidnuisance. NOW, THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED: 1.ThattheAgriculturalCommissionerisherebyorderedtoabatesuch nuisanceorcausethesametobeabatedbyhavingtheweedsreferredtodestroyedor removedbycutting,discing,chemicalsprayingoranyothermethoddeterminedbyhim; thatall debris,whetherin piles or scattered, be hauledaway; 2.ThattheAgriculturalCommissionerandhisdeputies,assistants, employees,contractingagentsorotherrepresentativesshallhaveexpressauthorizationto enteruponsaidprivatepropertiesforthepurposeofcausingsaidpublicnuisancetobe abated;and 3.Thatanyaffectedpropertyownersshallhavetherighttodestroyor removesuchweedsor debrishimselforherself orhavethesame destroyedorremovedat his/herownexpenseprovidedthatsuchdestructionorremovalshallhave beencompleted priortothearrivaloftheAgriculturalCommissionerorhisauthorizedrepresentativeto destroyorremovethem bytheParcelAbatementDeadline ofApril 15, 2011. BEITFURTHERRESOLVED: 1.ThattheAgriculturalCommissionershallkeepaccountofabatingsaid nuisanceandembodysuchaccountinareportandassessmentlisttotheCityCouncil, which shall befiledwiththeCityClerk. 2.Saidreportsofcosts,hearingandcollectionproceduresinvolvedshallbe providedas statedinChapter 9.08. ResolutionNo. 11-Page 2 PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof Cupertino on the 18th dayofJanuary 2011, bythefollowing vote: VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST:APPROVED: _______________________________________________ CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino RESOLUTION NO. 10-224 ARESOLUTIONOFTHECUPERTINOCITYCOUNCILDECLARING WEEDS ONCERTAINDESCRIBEDPROPERTYTOBEAPUBLICNUISANCEAND SETTINGAHEARINGFOROBJECTIONSTOPROPOSEDREMOVAL WHEREAS,weedsaregrowingintheCityofCupertinouponcertainstreets, sidewalks, highways,roadsand private property;and WHEREAS,saidweedsmayattainsuchgrowthastobecomeafiremenaceor whichare otherwise noxious or dangerous;and WHEREAS, saidweedsconstitutea public nuisance; NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDbytheCityCounciloftheCityof Cupertinoasfollows: 1.That saidweeds do nowconstitutea public nuisance; 2.Thatsaidnuisanceexistsuponallofthestreets,sidewalks,highways,roadsand privatepropertymoreparticularlydescribedbycommonnamesorbyreferenceto thetract,block,lot,codearea,andparcelnumberonthereportpreparedbythe AgriculturalCommissionerandattached hereto; 3.Thatthe18thdayofJanuary,2011,atthehourof6:45p.m.,orassoonthereafter asthemattercanbeheard,intheCouncilChamberintheCommunityHall,City ofCupertino,isherebysetasthetimeandplacewhereallpropertyownershaving any objectionstothe proposedremoval of suchweedsmay be heard; 4.ThattheAgriculturalCommissionerisherebydesignatedandorderedasthe persontocausenoticeoftheadoptionofthisresolutiontobegiveninthemanner andform providedinSections 9.08.040 oftheCupertino MunicipalCode. ResolutionNo. 10-224Page 2 PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingofthecityCounciloftheCityof Cupertinothis 7thday ofDecember, 2010, bythefollowing vote: VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil AYES:Chang, Mahoney,Santoro,Wang,Wong NOES:None ABSENT:None ABSTAIN:None ATTEST:APPROVED: /s/KimberlySmithGilbertWong _______________________________________________ CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject Mid-Year budgetadjustment RecommendedAction Approvemid-year budgetadjustment Description AdjustGeneralFund budgetedrevenuesandexpendituresby $321,875asfollows: RevenueIncreases Sales Tax$81,875 BudgetSavingsfromPriorYear$240,000 TOTALREVENUES$321,875 ExpenditureIncreases ERAF-TEApropertytaxlegislationandgrantsconsultant$21,875 Revenuetaxmeasurerate studyand polling$60,000 Zoningchangefor slopedR-1lots$25,000 ABAGRegionalHousingNeedsAllocation(RHNA) sub-$50,000 regionalreport preparation Permittrackingsystem$165,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES$321,875 Discussion BudgetaryConditions Staff projectsa smallGeneralFund surplusfor 2010-11 because of strongerthananticipated salestaxgrowth so farthisyear.However,fiscal2009-10endedwithrevenuesthatwere $2.3 millionlowerthanexpected duetotherecession.The stronggrowth of 2010-11 hasmade up most ofthat shortfallleavingafund balance of $14.4millionattheend of 2010-11, or $0.5 millionaboveminimumreservelevels. Therevisedfive-yearforecast showsanimproved 2011- 12 but becauseoflowerpropertytaxrevenuesandincreasedPERScosts, beginningin 2012, GeneralFundreservesare projectedtofall belowpolicylevels.Statelegislationto provide equityin propertytaxallocationsis one solution being pursued. Cupertino has keptcosts downwithacontract policeforce, selective hiringfreeze, smallwage increases,caps onemployer healthcarecostcontributions,andlimits on newcapital projects. Other possiblerevenuemeasures beingconsideredatthistimeareatransient occupancytax (TOT)rateincreaseanda storm drain/cleancreeks parceltaxincrease. Revenue and Expenditure Budget Adjustments Usingthe surplusand budget savings, staff proposesadjusting budgeted 2010-11GeneralFund revenuesandexpendituresby $321,875 asfollows: RevenueIncreases- $321,875 Year-end savings of $240,000and stronger salestax of $81,875 should bereflected on the revenue side. ExpenditureIncreases-$321,875 PropertyTaxLegislation and GrantsConsultant- $21,875 TheCity has beenworkingwithalegislativeconsultant,inconjunctionwithSaratoga,LosAltos Hillsand MonteSereno,ongetting statelegislationtocorrectthe disproportionateamount of propertytaxes shiftedfromthesecitiestothe state undercurrent EducationalRevenue AugmentationFund(ERAF)Tax EquityAllocation(TEA)formulas. Theconsultantisalsowell regardedinfindinggrantsthatcould helptheCity’sfinancial picture. The$21,875includesthe City’s sharedcost of $4,375throughtheend ofthismonthforthe ERAFissueand $17,500 for theCity’s solecostfromFebruarythruJune 2011 for pursuinglegislativegrantawards. RevenueTaxMeasureRate Study and Polling- StormDrain/CleanCreeks- $60,000 Storm drain/cleancreeksmaintenanceandimprovement parceltaxes havenotchanged since 1992and nowrequireaGeneralFundannual subsidy.Staffrecommendsa storm drain/clean creeksrate studyforapproximately $30,000 thatwouldidentifythetotalcost ofthis programand anappropriaterate structure. Thatinformationcould be usedina pollcostingapproximately $24,000thatwould determinethe viabilityofa storm drain/cleancreekstaxincreaseineitherthe upcomingNovember 2011generalelection orasaseparatemail-in ballottoindividual parcel ownersateitherAugust30, 2011 or March 6, 2012.Sixthousand dollarswould be neededfor part-time helpincommunity outreach. TheNovember ballotwouldrequire 2/3majority passage ofthe generalelectorateandcostapproximately$30,000inCountyelectioncoststo hold. The separatemail-in ballotsrequirea simplemajoritybutcostsapproximately$130,000to hold since theCounty does notconductelections directedto parcel ownersandthereforetheCitymust bear allcosts.Budgetsforthe $30,000 or $130,000 electioncostswould be decidedas part ofthe 2011-12 budgetand onlyifthe pollingindicatesprobable passage ofthetaxmeasure.Rate study ($30,000), polling($24,000),and outreachcosts($6,000)totaling $60,000should be budgeted nowifthisrevenuemeasureis pursued. RevenueTaxMeasureRate Study and Polling Alternative-TransientOccupancyTax- $30,000 Alternatively,increasingthetransient occupancytax on hotelsfrom 10%to 11%wouldincrease generalfundrevenuesby $210,000 to $250,000 annually based on recentrevenuetrends.Sucha measurecouldappear ontheNovembergeneralelection,requiringamajority vote. Election, polling,and outreachcostswould be $30,000, $24,000, and $6,000 respectively.LosAltosisat 11%;CampbellandPaloAltoareat 12%. The pollingand outreachcoststotaling $30,000 should be budgeted nowifthisrevenuemeasureis pursued. ExpenditureIncreasesfor Additional ProgramNeeds Usingin-housesavings,staff proposestofundcertain program needs.CommunityDevelopment generated savings of $240,000fromcompleting planning studieswith staffinstead of using consultants. These savingsmakeit possibletoaddressthefollowing needs: Zoningchangefor slopedR-1lots$25,000 ABAGRegionalHousingNeedsAllocation(RHNA) sub-$50,000 regionalreport preparation Permittrackingsystem$165,000 In summer 2010, theCitywas notifiedbyitscurrent softwareprovider,Pentamation,thatit would begin phasing-out support oftheCity’sexisting permittrackingsystem, usedby planning and building.Inadditiontothis notice ofintent,the developmentreview streamlining study identifiedthe needto domorein providing on-line supportforapplicants.Atthat point, staff begantoallocatefunding via ourannualinformationtechnology budgetforthiscriticale- servicesapplicationandperformedageneralinquiryastowhatsystemswereavailabletomeet theCity’s needs.Originalestimatesrangedfrom $350,000 to $500,000 asaresult ofthisinquiry. ThecurrentI.T. budgethas $224,000 already set-aside.Another $165,000 could beaddedfrom CommunityDevelopmentcost savings. FiscalImpact Approvingallrevenueandexpenditureincreaserecommendationsmaintainsa balancedGeneral Fund budgetfor 2010-11. _____________________________________ Preparedby:DavidWoo,FinanceDirector Reviewedby:CarolA.Atwood,DirectorofAdministrativeServices ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject Mid-YearCapitalImprovementProgram(CIP)ReviewandStatusReport. RecommendedAction Direct staffto proceedwiththeCIPascurrentlyapproved,withadjustmentstothe programto be proposed duringtheannual budgetreviewinSpring, 2011. Discussion Inpreparationforthe Mid-YearBudgetReview,thelist ofthe projectsintheCapital ImprovementProgram(CIP)wastransmittedtoCouncilinItemsinNovember, 2010. The attached spreadsheet hasbeen updatedas ofJanuary 6, 2011. As projectssuchastheStevens CreekCorridorProjectPhaseIIarecurrently underfunded, specialattention has been paidto projectsthat havebeencompletedwithfundsremainingandprojectsthatcould berecommended for deferral. Theintentof staffisto providetheCouncilwith optionsavailabletoadvance underfundedor newprojectsifit so desires. Summary Ofthefifty-ninereported projects,therearemanythatareeithercomplete,underconstruction, arerequired duetoregulatorymandates, orarefundedbyenterprisefundsthatcannot be divertedto other uses.Itisrecommendedthatall ofthese projectsmeetingthesecriteria proceed atthistime. Ofthefourteencomplete projects, nine havefundsremainingthatmay beredirectedbackto underfundedor newprojectstotalingapproximately $490,000, as highlightedinAttachmentA. Itis staff’srecommendationtocontinuewiththeCIPascurrentlyapproved,identifythecurrent completed projectbalancesas savings,andto proposethe use ofthis savings duringtheannual budget processfor 2011-12.Itisanticipatedthatthismoneycan partiallyfillin part ofthe fundinggapforconstructionfortheStevensCreekCorridorProject,PhaseII. Therewill bea fundinggapintheSCCPregardless ofthe preferred projectalternativethatis selected, butthere iscurrently sufficientfundingintheSCCPfortheremainderofthecurrentfiscalyearto proceed with design. FiscalImpact None _____________________________________ Preparedby:TerryW.Greene,CityArchitect Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments:CIPSpreadsheet CITY OFCUPERTINOCIPSTATUSREPORT ItemFundOriginalEncumberedAccountPotential StatusofProject No.FundDescriptionPM *AllocationBudgetToDateBalanceReallocation Parks úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×óÊÊÓÕÛÈÓÍÎúúöê×Æ èõ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø çÌÕÊÛØ×Éê×ÙöÇÎØ éÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÍÌ×ÎÚÓØÉÍÎòÛÎÇÛÊÃ ÛÎØÉÈÛÊÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏóÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×çÌÕÊÛØ×Éèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ COMPLETE ùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐÛØÍÌÈ×Øê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎÍÖöÓÎÛÐûÙÙ×ÌÈÛÎÙ×ÍÎîÍÆ ìÛÊÑè×ÎÎÓÉùÍÇÊÈê×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕêðê×ÙöÇÎØ ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÚÛÐÛÎÙ×ÙÛÎÚ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×Øê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÖÇÎØ éÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÍÌ×ÎÚÓØÉÍÎòÛÎÇÛÊÃ ÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø éÙ×ÎÓÙùÓÊÙÐ×ûÙÙ×ÉÉèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ÖÍÊéÌÊÓÎÕÍÖ COMPLETE- ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÓÉÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÙÍÎÉÓØ×Êê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎÍÖöÓÎÛÐ éÈ×ÊÐÓÎÕúÛÊÎÔÛÊÈìÛÊÑèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ûÙÙ×ÌÈÛÎÙ×ÓÎö×Ú ÙÍÎÈÓÎÕ×ÎÈÇÌÍÎÊ×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÓÎÍÊÌÊ×ÆÛÓÐÓÎÕ ÅÛÕ×ØÓÉÌÇÈ×Ú×ÈÅ××ÎùÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÖÍÊÏ×Ê×ÏÌÐÍÃ×× õÊÛÎÈÉ COMPLETE- ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÖÇÎØÉØ×ØÓÙÛÈ×ØÈÍÍÎÕÍÓÎÕÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ìÛÊÑø×Ø éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑìÔÛÉ×èõ ÚÃÈÔ×ÕÊÛÎÈÉÛÎØÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÕÊÛÎÈÛÎØÌ×ÊÏÓÈÙÐÍÉ×ÍÇÈ õ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÛÊÑø×Ø ïÓÐÐõÊÛÎÈÛÅÛÊØ×ØÓÎé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÖÍÊ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑìÔÛÉ× èõ õÊÛÎÈ òÛÎÇÛÊÃ éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊð×ÕÛÙÃöÛÊÏèõê×ÙöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊíÊÙÔÛÊØóÊÊÓÕÛÈÓÍÎèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø ø×ÉÓÕÎÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÉÍÓÐÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÊ×Æ×ÛÐ×ØÐ×ÛØÙÍÎÈÛÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ïÍÊ×ÉÍÓÐÈ×ÉÈÓÎÕÛÎØÈÔ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÊ×Ï×ØÓÛÐÛÙÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÓÉÇÎØ×Ê è×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃøÍÕìÛÊÑïÛÊÃûÆ×ÎÇ×èõê×ÙöÇÎØ ÅÛÃÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×Ê×Ï×ØÓÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÉÈÉïÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÈÍØÛÈ×ÅÛÉÌÛÓØÖÍÊ ÖÊÍÏÛÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÖÇÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕÚÇØÕ×ÈÈÔÛÈÅÛÉÉ×ÈÛÉÓØ×ÖÍÊÈÔ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃØÍÕÌÛÊÑ COMPLETE è×ÎÎÓÉùÍÇÊÈê×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕêðéÌÍÊÈÉùÈÊ æÛÊÓÍÇÉìÛÊÑìÛÈÔÛÎØìÛÊÑÓÎÕðÍÈê×ÌÛÓÊÉ êðõ×ÎöÇÎØ úÛÉÓÙÅÍÊÑÚ×ÓÎÕØÍÎ×ÎÍÅûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÅÍÊÑÙÛÎÚ×Ø×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÇÎÈÓÐöã ê×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕ æÛÊÓÍÇÉèÊÛÓÐê×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÛÈéÙÔÍÍÐéÌÍÊÈÉ êðõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÙÍÇÐØØ×Ö×ÊÅÍÊÑ öÓ×ÐØÉ åÓÐÉÍÎìÛÊÑóÊÊÓÕÛÈÓÍÎéÃÉÈ×Ïê×ÎÍÆÛÈÓÍÎêðõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÙÍÇÐØØ×Ö×ÊÅÍÊÑ èõÿè×ÊÊÃõÊ××Î×ùÓÈÃûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈ êðÿêÍÕ×Êð××ûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉïÛÓÎÈìÛÕ×ûÐÐØÛÈÛÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×ÛÉÍÖòÛÎ õõÿõÐ×ÎÎõÍ×ÌÖ×ÊÈûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ÷ÎÕ ItemFundOriginalEncumberedAccountPotential No.FundDescriptionPM *AllocationBudgetToDateBalanceReallocationStatusofProject Buildings ûïêÛØÓÍéÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÈ×ÎÎÛÛÎØèÊÛÎÉÏÓÈÈ×Ê èõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø ê×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ èÔ×ùÓÈÃùÐ×ÊÑÉÖÐÍÛÈÓÎÕÆÍÈÓÎÕÌÛÎ×ÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÓÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÌÔÛÉ×ÛÎØÓÉ ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÖÍÊÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÓÎïÛÊÙÔèÔ×ùÓÈÃôÛÐÐÙÍÎÖ×Ê×ÎÙ×ÊÍÍÏÆÓØ×Í ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃù×ÎÈ×ÊûÇØÓÍæÓÉÇÛÐçÌÕÊÛØ×èõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÓÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÌÔÛÉ×ÛÎØÓÉÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÖÍÊÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÓÎ ûÌÊÓÐèÔ×÷íùÛÇØÓÍÆÓÉÇÛÐÇÌÕÊÛØ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÓÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÌÔÛÉ×ÛÎØÓÉ ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÖÍÊÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÓÎòÇÎ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØùÓÈÃÔÛÉÒÇÉÈÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ØÈÔ×ÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÛÅÛÊØ ÷íùõ×Î×ÊÛÈÍÊÅ èÊÛÓÐ×ÊèõõÊÛÎÈ Ð×ÈÈ×ÊÖÍÊÈÔ×ÕÊÛÎÈ Û ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ÷ÏÕõ×Î×ÊÛÈÍÊçÌÕÊÛØ×èõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø Ú õÊÛÎÈ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØùÓÈÃÔÛÉÒÇÉÈÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ØÈÔ×ÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÛÅÛÊØ ùôõ×Î×ÊÛÈÍÊùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎèõ õ×ÎöÇÎØ Ð×ÈÈ×ÊÖÍÊÈÔ×ÕÊÛÎÈ Ù ÷Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃæÛÎçÌÕÊÛØ×èõõ×ÎöÇÎØ éÇÚÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø Ø COMPLETE ûÇÈÍÏÛÈ×ØÅÛÈ×ÊÖÓÐÈ×ÊÙÐ×ÛÎÓÎÕÉÃÉÈ×ÏØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ× ðÓÚÊÛÊÃöÍÇÎÈÛÓÎèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ÓÏÌÊÛÙÈÓÙÛÐÊ×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÚÇØÕ×ÈÙÛÎÚ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×ØïÛÎÇÛÐÖÓÐÈ×ÊÙÐ×ÛÎÓÎÕÅÓÐÐ ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ× ðÓÚÊÛÊÃìÛÊÑÓÎÕèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×Ø èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÚÃÈÔ×Ø×ÛØÐÓÎ×ÍÖÈÔ× ÕÊÛÎÈ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ÷ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎõÊÛÎÈ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÕÊÛÎÈÖÇÎØÓÎÕÔÛÉÚ××ÎÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÚÇÈÛÅÛÊØÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ× èõ öÛÙÓÐÓÈÃê×ÙöÇÎØ Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÇÎÈÓÐïÛÊÙÔ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÍÎÔÍÐØø×ÉÓÕÎÈ×ÛÏÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×ØÚÃ êöìÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÉÈÍÅÍÊÑÍÎúÐÛÙÑÉÏÓÈÔÉÔÍÌÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×É ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÚ××Ä×ÙÇÈ×ØÛÉÛÌÛÊÈÍÖúÐÛÙÑÉÏÓÈÔéÔÍÌÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÈ×ÏÎÍ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔôéÛÎÓÈÛÊÃùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ COMPLETE éùùììÔÛÉ× ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÛÎØù÷ëûÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑúÐØÕóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉèõìÛÊÑø×Ø ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÚÛÐÛÎÙ×ÙÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÛÐÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø COMPLETE ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÓÎòÇÎ× ÖÍÊôìÍÐ×úÛÊÎ èÊÛÓÐ õÊÛÎÈ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÛÎØ úÐÛÙÑÉÏÓÈÔéÔÍÌØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔöÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉèõ õ×ÎöÇÎØ ê×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎìÍÐ×úÛÊÎÛÎØèÊÛÓÐÛÊ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÛÎØÛÙÙ×ÌÈ×Ø úÐÛÙÑÉÏÓÈÔéÔÍÌÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÛÈÇÉÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎ ê×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÊ×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÚ×ÓÎÕ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ØÚÃ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔúÐÛÙÑÉÏÓÈÔéÔÍÌèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÈ×ÛÏ öÇÎØÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÖÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÉÓØÓÎÕÈÊÓÏÛÎØ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔê×ÌÛÓÊÉìÛÓÎÈÓÎÕèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ Ø×ÈÛÓÐÉÍÎïÓÐÑúÛÊÎÛÎØåÛÈ×ÊèÍÅ×ÊÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÖ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ× È×ÊÏÓÈ×ØÛÏÛÕ× COMPLETE ïÍÎÈÛæÓÉÈÛê×ÙùÈÊöÐÍÍÊùÛÚÓÎ×Èêðê×ÙöÇÎØ Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÚÇØÕ×ÈÙÛÎÚ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×Ø ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÎØ×ÊÅÛÃÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÅÓÈÔûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈÇÊÛÐÖÓÊÏÈÍÌÊÍØÇÙ×ÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÇÛÐ ëÇÓÎÐÛÎù×ÎÈ×ÊóÎÈ×ÊÓÍÊçÌÕÊÛØ×èõê×ÙöÇÎØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×É COMPLETE ëÇÓÎÐÛÎù×ÎÈ×ÊèÊ×ÐÐÓÉèõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÚÛÐÛÎÙ×ÙÛÎÚ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×Ø COMPLETE é×ÊÆÓÙ×ù×ÎÈ×Êé×ÙÇÊÓÈÃõÛÈ×êðõ×ÎöÇÎØ Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÚÛÐÛÎÙ×ÙÛÎÚ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×Ø èõÿè×ÊÊÃõÊ××Î×ùÓÈÃûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈ êðÿêÍÕ×Êð××ûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉïÛÓÎÈìÛÕ× ûÐÐØÛÈÛÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×ÛÉÍÖòÛÎ õõÿõÐ×ÎÎõÍ×ÌÖ×ÊÈûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ÷ÎÕ ItemFundOriginalEncumberedAccountPotential No.FundDescriptionPM *AllocationBudgetToDateBalanceReallocationStatusofProject é×ÊÆÓÙ×ù×ÎÈ×ÊèÍÍÐùÊÓÚêðõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÙÍÇÐØØ×Ö×ÊÅÍÊÑÈÍöã Streets ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÎØ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ùÇÊÚõÇÈÈ×ÊÛÎØéÓØ×ÅÛÐÑê×ÌÛÓÊÉûøû õõõÛÉèÛÄ ÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××ÎÉÌ×ÎÈØÇ×ÈÍÉÐÍÅÊ×Æ×ÎÇ×ÛÙÙÊÇÛÐèÔÓÉÓÉÎÍÈ êÛÏÌÉ ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÊ×ÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÓÉÎÍÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉÉÇÚÈÍÈÛÐ õÊÛÎÈÉ COMPLETE ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÖÇÎØÉÎ××Ø×ØÈÍÖÓÎÛÐÓÂ×ÍÖûÉúÇÓÐÈØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉ ïÛÊÃûÆ×úÓÙÃÙÐ×öÍÍÈÚÊÓØÕ×èõõÛÉèÛÄ ÛÎØÐÛÎØØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÈÍùÛÐÈÊÛÎÉ õ×ÎöÇÎØ èÔ×ÖÇÎØÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÏ×ØÓÎÈÍÛùóìÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÊöã èÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉ ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×íÛÑÉìÛÊÑùÍÎØÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ØûÇÕ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×Ê ÛÎØ ÖÊÍÏÛÏÍÈÍÊÓÉÈÖÍÊÈÔ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ØÛÏÛÕ×ØöÍÍÈÔÓÐÐ ïÍÎÇÏ×ÎÈõÛÈ×ÅÛÃéÓÕÎø×ÉÓÕÎéÓÕÎèõ øÛÏÛÕ×ùÐÛÓÏ úÐÆØÉÓÕÎèÔ×ùÓÈÃ×ÄÌ×ÙÈÉÈÍÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÖÊÍÏìå ïÛÊÑ×ÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÉÙÍÏÏÓÈÈ×ØÈÔ×ÖÇÎØÉÈÍÛùóìÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔ× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉÖÍÊûú Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÏ×È ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈõõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÎØ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ COMPLETE Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÏÍÎ×ÃÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×ÛÐÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÍÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊÐÍÙÛÐ ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈûêêûöã õõûêêû ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÇ×ÈÍö×Ø×ÊÛÐÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ Û ùÓÈÃØÓØÎÍÈÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÔ× ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÖÍÊöã èÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈûêêûöã õõûêêû ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈØÓØÎÍÈÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ÈÔ×ûêêûÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎØ×ÉÓÕÎ×Ø Ú ÚÇÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÎÔÍÐØíñÈÍÙÐÍÉ×ÛÙÙÍÇÎÈ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÎØ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÔ×ÏÍÎ×ÃÓÉÙÍÏÏÓÈÈ×ØèÔÓÉÓÉö×Ø×ÊÛÐÏÍÎ×ÃÛÎØÓÉÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÇÉ×ØÖÓÊÉÈ ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÌúõõìÊÍÌú ÅÔ×ÎÖÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÍÈÔÛÈÏÍÎÓ×ÉÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÐÍÉÈÛÎØ ÈÍÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÕÛÉÈÛÄÏÍÎÓ×É ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÎØ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÔ×ÏÍÎ×ÃÓÉÙÍÏÏÓÈÈ×ØèÔÓÉÓÉö×Ø×ÊÛÐÏÍÎ×ÃÛÎØÓÉÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÇÉ×ØÖÓÊÉÈ ìÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÌ õõìÊÍÌ ÅÔ×ÎÖÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÍÈÔÛÈÏÍÎÓ×ÉÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÐÍÉÈÛÎØ ÈÍÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÕÛÉÈÛÄÏÍÎÓ×É êÛÎÙÔÍêÓÎÙÍÎÛØÛéÈÊ××ÈéÈÇØÃõõõÊÛÎÈ æèûÖÇÎØÓÎÕæèûÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ØÈÔ×É×ÖÇÎØÉìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÍÎÔÍÐØ TrafficFacilities åÍÊÑÎÍÈÉÈÛÊÈ×ØÛÖÈ×ÊÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÈÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÈÔÛÉÚ××Î Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÔ×ØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÖÊÍÏ ø×ûÎÂÛúÐÆØ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎ ìÛÙÓÖÓÙÛéÓÕÎÛÐÈÔ×õÛÉéÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÍø×ûÎÂÛÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÇÎÈÓÐÊ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÛÊÙ×ÐÈÔÓÉ õõø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×Ê ïÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÊÑÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØéÈÛÖÖÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÊ×ÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÏ×Ø ÖÇÎØÉÛÎØÅÛÓÈÓÎÕÇÎÈÓÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔ×ÛÉÈÙÍÊÎ×ÊÈÍÏÍØÓÖÃÈÔ× ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ õÊÛÎÈ ø×ÉÓÕÎÓÉÛÈÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÖÍÊéÇÏÏ×ÊÍÖ õÊÛÎÈ éÛÖ×êÍÇÈ×ÉÈÍéÙÔÍÍÐõÛÊØ×ÎõÛÈ×õõ õ×ÎöÇÎØ ÖÇÎØÉÎ××ØÈÍÚ××ÄÌ×ÎØ×ØÚÃéÌÊÓÎÕÍÖ æÛÊÓÍÇÉèÊÛÖÖÓÙéÓÕÎÛÐúÛÈÈ×ÊÃúÛÙÑÇÌéÃÉÈ×Ï õõõ×ÎöÇÎØ åÍÊÑÓÉÇÎØ×ÊÅÛÃÛÎØÅÓÐÐÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÚÃÈÔ××ÎØÍÖ öÓÎÛÐìÔÛÉ× èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÌÐÛÎÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÈÍÇÌÕÊÛØ×ÛÎÃÉÓÕÎÛÐÉÚÇÈÈÔÓÉÖÇÎØÔÛÉÚ××Î æÛÊÓÍÇÉèÊÛÖÖÓÙéÓÕÎÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎïÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉõõõ×ÎöÇÎØ ÇÉ×ØÖÍÊÏÓÎÍÊÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÅÔ×ÎÎ××Ø×ØÛÈÉÓÕÎÛÐÉôÛÐÖÍÖÈÔ×ÚÛÐÛÎÙ× ÙÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÇÎÈÓÐÎ×ÄÈÖÓÉÙÛÐÃ×ÛÊ èõÿè×ÊÊÃõÊ××Î×ùÓÈÃûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈ êðÿêÍÕ×Êð××ûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉïÛÓÎÈìÛÕ× ûÐÐØÛÈÛÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×ÛÉÍÖòÛÎ õõÿõÐ×ÎÎõÍ×ÌÖ×ÊÈûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ÷ÎÕ ItemFundOriginalEncumberedAccountPotential No.FundDescriptionPM *AllocationBudgetToDateBalanceReallocationStatusofProject StormDrainage éÈÍÊÏøÊÛÓÎ õÛÉèÛÄ úÍÐÐÓÎÕ×ÊúÓÑ×ðÛÎ×É ùÛÐÛÚÛÂÛÉùÊúÊÓØÕ×õõ èÔ×É×ÖÇÎØÉÛÊ×ÙÍÏÏÓÈÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÓÏÚÇÊÉ×éùæåøÖÍÊÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø õ×ÎöÇÎØ õÊÛÎÈÉ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÎØ×ÊÅÛÃöÇÎØÓÎÕÙÍÆ×ÊÉÍÎ×ÈÓÏ×ÇÌØÛÈ×ÍÖéÈÍÊÏøÊÛÓÎïÛÉÈ×Ê ïÓÎÍÊéÈÍÊÏøÊÛÓÎóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉõõéÈÍÊÏøÊÛÓÎ ìÐÛÎÈÍ×ÎÛÚÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÖ××ÛØÒÇÉÈÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÛÎÎÇÛÐÉÈÍÊÏØÊÛÓÎ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÉÎ××ØÉÛÊÓÉ× ø×ÉÓÕÎÓÉ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÏ××ÈÓÎÕÓÎéÌÊÓÎÕ ïÍÎÈÛæÓÉÈÛéÈÍÊÏøÊÛÓÎÛÕ×éÃÉÈ×ÏõõéÈÍÊÏøÊÛÓÎ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÉÈÛÊÈéÇÏÏ×Ê Environmental õÊÛÎÈ éÓ×Ï×ÎÉéÈÊ××ÈðÓÕÔÈÉóÊÊÓÕÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎêð åÍÊÑÓÎÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉ õ×ÎöÇÎØ UnfundedProjects èÔ×ùÓÈÃôÛÐÐÊ×ÏÍØ×ÐØÓØÎÍÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÐÛÈ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÈÍ ËÇÛÐÓÖÃÖÍÊ÷ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐöÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÈÇÉèÔ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÇÌÕÊÛØ×ÓÉÇÎÖÇÎØ×Ø ùÓÈÃôÛÐÐê×ÏÍØ×Ðé×ÓÉÏÓÙçÌÕÊÛØ×èõ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÙÍÉÈÖÍÊÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙ ÙÍØ×ÇÌÕÊÛØ×É ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÙÍÉÈÖÍÊÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÌÕÊÛØ×É éÌÍÊÈÉù×ÎÈ×ÊõÃÏÎÛÉÓÇÏèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ éÑÛÈ×ìÛÊÑèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐè×ÎÎÓÉùÍÇÊÈðÓÕÔÈÓÎÕéÌÍÊÈÉ èõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ ù×ÎÈ×Ê ðÛÅÊ×ÎÙ×ïÓÈÈÃìÛÊÑûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐöÇÎØÓÎÕèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ éÓÏÏÉìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÈÍúÛÃéÈÇØÃíÎÐÃèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈèúø éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐúÊÓØÕ×íÆ×Êçììêèõ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ èÛÎÑôÍÇÉ×ùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎîÛÈÔÛÎôÛÐÐèõéÈÛÖÖÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃ×ÄÌÐÍÊÓÎÕÇÉ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ÙÍØ×É ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØùÍÉÈ îìø÷éðÛÊÕ×èÊÛÉÔùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÆÓÙ×õõ ûúûõõÊÛÎÈÍÖ ÈÍÚ×ÛÇÕÏ×ÎÈÏÛÎØÛÈ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Total9,186,0591,355,834 èõÿè×ÊÊÃõÊ××Î×ùÓÈÃûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈ êðÿêÍÕ×Êð××ûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉïÛÓÎÈìÛÕ×ûÐÐØÛÈÛÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×ÛÉÍÖòÛÎ õõÿõÐ×ÎÎõÍ×ÌÖ×ÊÈûÉÉÈøÓÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ÷ÎÕ PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2011 Subject StevensCreekCorridorProject,PhaseII RecommendedAction 1.Authorize stafftoinitiatethe designeffortforAlternative 4A. 2.AuthorizetheCityManagerto negotiateandexecuteanamendmentwithSSALandscape Architectsfor design services nottoexceed $200,000. 3.AuthorizetheCityManagertoissueLetters ofIntentto various grantingagencies clarifyingtheCity’sintentto proceedwithAlternative 4Aandcreekrestoration. 4.Authorize stafftoinitiateanenvironmentalclearance processforthe project. Discussion OnNovember 29, 2010,Councilreceiveda statusreport oftheStevensCreekCorridorProject (SCCP)PhaseII. That statusreport providedtime sensitiveinformationregardingthereceiptby theCityofa $1.2M stategrantthatcould beappliedtotheentire projectifthe projectalternative wasexpandedtoincludecreekrestoration. This samereportwas providedtotheParksandRecreationCommission onJanuary 6, 2011 and included veryrecentinformationfromtheCity’shydrologistandtheCity’sgolfcourse designer thatlikelywill significantlyreducethe potentialphysicalimpactstothegolfcourseifAlternative 4Aischosen. TheParksandRecreationCommission votedtorecommendapproval of Alternative 4A. Thisreport describesthemostrecentinformationalongwitha staffrecommendationto proceed withAlternative 4A. Thetiming of $1.2M state grantis suchthatifCouncil desiresto pursuethe grantandan alternativethatincludescreekrestoration, staff needsthat directionatthistimeto begin design andmeetthegrantconstruction deadlines.OnlyAlternatives 4Aand4Bare discussedinthis report sincetheyaretheonlyalternatives presentedinNovemberwithacreekrestoration component.Alternative4Ais discussedatlength sinceitisconsideredfinanciallyfeasiblewhile Alternative4Bmay beconsidered“out ofreach”financially duetothecurrenteconomicclimate. Alternative 3, which onlyincludesthetrailconnectionfromtheBlackberryFarm parkinglotto StevensCreekBoulevard,is stillfeasible butthetimelineis notascritical sincethis specific grantwould not beapplicable. CreekRestoration Creekrestoration,if undertaken,would be similartothework doneinPhaseI,consistingofthe removal of brokenconcreteriprap, buildingrifflesand poolsforthefederally-threatened Steelhead,andwideningthechannelfor highwatereventsandimprovedhabitat value. Capturingandrelocatingthefish, dewateringthecreek,removing non-native vegetation,and planting nativevegetationandtreeswouldbeinvolvedinthecreekchannelwork. It should be notedthatthe stategrantingagencyisinfavor ofAlternative4A, butthe grantis expectedto beeligiblefor usetoaccomplishAlternative 4BifCouncil determinesthatto bethe better solution. The grantcannot be usedforanyotheralternativethat does notincludecreek restoration. The grantadministratorhasinformed staffthatthe projectmust becompletebySeptember of 2013toremaineligibleforthefull $1.2M reimbursement. To completethefull scope ofthework andmeetthatSeptember2013 deadline, staffhasdeterminedthat designmust begininJanuary of 2011. Thistimelineallowsforanappropriatepublicinput periodforthe new designandan updated MitigatedNegativeDeclaration,alongwiththetime necessaryto obtain permitsfrom theregulatoryagencies. The grantagreement does not needto beexecuted untilearlyJune of 2011,allowingCounciland stafftimeto secureadditionalgrantfunding.Ifadditionalgrantfundingturns outto be insufficientbyJune of 2011,Councilcan direct staff nottoexecutethegrantandto stopthe project. The sunk costsatthat pointareestimatedto beapproximately $200,000,includingthe $50,000expendedto date. GolfCourseImpacts Staffconsideredimpactstothegolfcourseto beapotentiallyfatalflaw ofAlternative 4Amore thanayearagowhenthisalternativewasfirstcontemplated.In March of2010, staffengaged LandmarkGolfofIndianWells,Californiato studyAlternative 4Aforgolfcourseimpacts. Landmark hasbeeninvolvedin designandconstruction ofmajorgolfcoursesaroundtheUnited States,especially on thewestcoast, since 1972.Atthattimeitwasassumed, usingexistingaerial survey data,thatcreekencroachmentintothegolfcoursemight beasmuchas 35 feetfromthe th existingtop of bank, nearly bisectingthe 9fairway. Whilefurther designandanalysisarerequired,preliminary studiesbytheCity’screek hydrologistconsultantandLandmarkGolfindicatethoseimpactswilllikelybeminimaland th manageable.AsrecentlyasJanuary 6, stafflearnedthat someflexibilityforthe design ofthe top of bank doesexistandthattheencroachmentintothegolfcoursecanvary butwill bemuch lessthanthe 35 feetthatwasthoughtto berequiredearlier.In someareas,therecanlikelyeven be no channelencroachmentatall. Thecreek,inAlternative 4A,must bewidened slightlyintothegolfcourse,alongthe ninth fairway.Additionally,asanitary sewerline undera portion ofthe ninthfairwaymay needto be relocatedtoprotectthelinefrom potentialerosionifitistooclosetothe newcreek bank.If theseconstructionactivitiesinfact do significantlyencroach on thecourse,LandmarkGolfhas indicatedthatthereareseveraltemporarywaystomaintaina nine holecoursethroughthefouror fivemonth period ofconstruction. Theyalso believethatthefinalconfiguration ofthe ninth holecan beprovidedinamannerconsistentwithUSGolfAssociationcriteria.Staffwill continuetoworktominimizeconstructionimpacts,ensurecontinuityofgolf play,and provide forthe best operationalconfiguration upon completion. Theeast bankofthecreekalongthegolfcoursehas beencoveredwithlarge bouldersand slabs ofconcrete overtheyearsto preventerosion. Much ofthisworkwasperformedbythe private owner beforetheCity purchasedthe propertyin1991. The narrowchannelwasfurtherdamaged bythefailure oftheconcrete,whenlargechunksslippedintothe stream bed orwhen highflows erodedthe soil behindthe slabs. Theresultisthatthe safepassageof spawning steelheadtrout has been disrupted. Theseimpedimentstofish passageare very similartothosethatwere removedfromthe upstreamchannel duringthePhase 1 project.All ofthisworkwould be requiredalongthegolfcourseineitherAlternative 4A or4B. Themain differenceinAlternative 4Aisthatthecreekchannelwouldremaininitscurrent locationand bewidenedtotheeastcreatinga newtop of bankinwhatis nowtherough orthe fairwayofthe ninth holeofthegolfcourse.Additionally,the newtop of bankwillrequirean adjacentvegetation bufferabout 10 feetwidethatwillfurtherencroachintothegolfcourse.Itis thoughtthat suitable native vegetationcan beidentifiedthat serves habitatgoalswhilealso being compatiblewiththeadjacentgolfactivity. The viability ofthisideawould haveto be vettedin the design phase, butthetotalencroachmentis nowthoughtto beabout 20to 25 feet. The designandconstructioncosts necessarytoaddressthegolfcourseimpactsinAlternative 4A have beenincludedinthe project budgetestimateof $3.5M. Alternative4Bwouldinsteadinvolvetrenchinganew 800 footlongby 65footwidecreek channelthroughtheStocklmeir orchard,causinga number of orchardtreesto beremoved. The existingcreekchannelwould be back-filledwith some oftheexcavated soilfromthe new channelandconvertedintoanenvironmentalwillow swale. FundingSourcesandShortfall Staff believesthatfundingforthe shortfall ofAlternative 4Amightbe partially obtainedfrom CIP savings or project deferrals.Staffalso believesthatadditional grantmoniesmaybe availablethroughtypicalgrantapplication processesandisactively pursuingthose.Inanycase, Alternative 4Aappearstoaccomplishmanygoalsandthereforeis staff’srecommended alternative. Thecreekandassociated habitatcanbenefitfromimprovements similartothe successfulPhaseI project,atthis stageitappearsthatimpactstothe operation ofthegolfcourse can beminimizedtocontinue operating successfullywithoutarevenue disruption, both during constructionand postconstruction,andmost oftheStocklmeirOrchardcanremainandbean enhancementtothe newtrail.Additionally,the significantcostassociatedwithrelocation ofthe creekincludedinAlternative 4Bcanbeavoided;makingthe project budgetachievablewithany ofa varietyof optionsthatcan beproposed duringtheannual budget process. Existingand potentialgrantfunding sourcesforAlternative 4Aare providedthefollowingtable: SourceFundingStatusConditionsforUse SCVWDGrant$100,000Havemust buildentiretrail ParkDedicationFees$150,000Remainingcan useforcreek ortrail CaRiverParkwaysGrant1,200,000Awardedcan use 50/50creek&trail SCVWD/FAHCECostShare800,000Likely,Junecreekrestoration only SCVWD – SafeCreeksGrant200,000Maybe,Junemaybe 75/25creek&trail State EEMPGrant250,000 Maybe, March‘12can use 20/80creek&trail TotalPotentialFunding2,700,000 ProjectBudget3,500,000 Shortfall$800,000 It should be notedthattheAlternative 4Afinancial shortfall, presentedinNovember of 2010, did nottakeintoaccountanyloss ofgolfcourserevenue ora potentiallong-termloss of players causedbyconstruction. CEQA InApril of 2006, CounciladoptedtheInitialStudy/ MitigatedNegativeDeclaration(MND) CEQA documentsfortheStevensCreekCorridorPark MasterPlanandRestorationPlan. Those documentsfullycovertheworkcontemplatedinPhaseII,recentlypresentedtoCouncilas Alternative4B.Staff has previouslybeenadvisedthatAlternative 4Acould potentially be addressedbya briefAddendum.AnAddendumtechnically does notrequirea publiccomment periodandcan be processedinamuch shorterperiod oftime. StaffisrecommendingthatCouncilinsteadapprove preparation ofa documentthatallowsfor publicreview,whichisexpectedto bea new orSubsequent MitigatedNegativeDeclaration.If Alternative 4Ais selected,thisapproachwillallowfora publicinput processto occur priorto adoption ofthe updateddocuments,andwould beamorerobustmeansofproviding environmentalclearance. Thischoicewouldrequirethatthe pending $250,000 state EnvironmentalEnhancementand MitigationProgram(EEMP)grantapplication bewithdrawnfromthecurrentgrantcycle, becauseitis dependentuponanapprovedenvironmental document beingin placebytheend of February. The deadlinedoes notallowenoughtimetoexecutea neworSubsequentNegative Declaration.Howeverthe EEMPgrant programisanannualfundingcycle,typicallyinvolving distribution of $10 million statewide.Ourgrantapplicationcan bere-submittedinfall ofthis year.Funding decisionsnormally occurthefollowing spring.Ifthere-submittedapplicationis successful,thetimingwouldeasilyallowthefundsto be usedforimplementingthe project. Giventhetechnicalchangein howtorestorethecreekwithencroachmentontothegolfcourse, staff believesthatthecommunityneedsthe opportunitytohavetheirinputconsideredand addressed viaanenvironmental process. ShouldCouncil selectAlternative 4Aand directthisapproach, staffwill overseepreparation of anappropriateenvironmentalclearance documentandconductanassociated publicreview process. RecentAlternativeVariations th AttheNovember 29meeting,Councilasked stafftoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconstructing thetrailalongtheentireeast side ofthecreektothe parkinglot,eliminatingtheneedfora bridge overthecreekand use oftheStocklmeir property.Inthiscase,thetrailwould be so closetothe golfcoursefairwaysthata ball protectionfencewould berequiredforitsentirelength. It should be notedthatasection of ball protectionfenceisalreadyincludedinthe scope ofwork forthe upperportion ofthetrailthatis plannedalongtheeast bank ofthecreekasit departsthe BlackberryFarm parkinglot. To continuethe protectionfencetothe parkinglotwouldcausethe entiretrailexperience ofmorethan 1,000 feetto becoveredbyaprotectivefence.Thiseast-side trailwouldalsoencroach ontothegolfcoursetoamuchlargerextentthaniscurrently envisionedby4A or4B. Letters ofIntent Some ofthe prospectivegrantingagenciesmightbemoreinclinedtoagreeto offergrantsforthis projectifaletter ofintentwere providedfromtheCity.Staff proposesthatCouncilauthorizethe CityManagerto submitletters ofintenttotheWaterDistrict,andto otherpotentialfundersas appropriate, outliningthe project scopeandthe dependence ongrantfunding. Theletterswould be preparedtoclearly statethattheCityisformallyrequestingfunds butwouldmake no promisesto proceedwiththe projectif sufficientfundingis not obtained. DesignTeam Infiscalyear 09/10Councilauthorized staffto proceedwiththedesignofPhaseIIas described asAlternative 3 inNovember.Itconsisted ofthetrail, bridge, parkinglotmodifications,and safetyimprovementstotheintersectionatPharLapDriveandStevensCreekBlvd.Staff requested qualificationsfrom selectedlandscapedesignfirmsinthebayareawithexpertisein trail designthroughenvironmentally sensitiveareas.Followinga standardRFQinterview process,thefirm ofSSALandscapeArchitects ofSantaCruzwas selectedas primeconsultant. SSA beganworkandtodate has providedpreliminary designsfortheBluePheasant parkinglot modifications. ShouldCouncil decideto proceedwith one ofthecreekrestorationalternatives, staff proposesto continuewithSSAandexpandthe subconsultantteambyadding several ofthose subconsultants originallyinvolvedinthePhaseIwork. Schedule Whilea detailed designandconstruction scheduleneedsto be developed,designforeither restorationalternativecan beaccomplishedin 2011, permitsreviewedandissuedin 2012, and constructionexecutedandcompletedbythefallof 2013.Potentialimpactstothegolfcourse would not occur untilconstruction beganand staff believesthereis sufficienttimeto developthe necessaryalternativestominimizethoseimpacts. SustainabilityImpact:Alternative 4A ofSCCP,PhaseII,fully supportstheCity’s sustainability goals. FiscalImpact ItisassumedthattheCitywill needtofrontthemoneyfortheprojectandreimbursethegeneral fundwhengrantmoneyisreceived. The projectcurrently has $1.4M inapprovedfundsforthe FY 10/11CIP, however$1.1M ofthisamountexpectedasParkDedicationFeesexpectedfrom theRoseBowl project have not beenreceivedto dateand should not beanticipatedinthe near term. Thereare no newGeneralFundmoniesavailableforcapital projectfinancingthisyear.In orderto backfillthisgap, savingsfromcompletedCIP projectsinthecurrentyearcould be appliedtoSCCPPhaseII,and otherCIP projectscould be deferredas necessary. These recommendationswill be proposedasmoreinformationis known duringtheannual budget process. Itisexpectedthatabout $1.5M ofthetotal $3.5M project budgetwould besufficientthroughout all of 2011 and 2012 fordesignand permitting.The balance of $2.0M would be necessary possiblyinlate 2012 butcertainlyin 2013 forconstructionandconstruction phase services. _____________________________________ Preparedby:TerryW.Greene,CityArchitect Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:January 18, 2010 Subject SecondReadingandAdoption of MunicipalCodeAmendmentsto beconsistentwiththe 2007- 2014Housing Element. RecommendedAction StaffrecommendsthattheCityCouncilconductthe secondreadingandadoptOrdinanceNo. 11- 2073:“AnOrdinance oftheCityCouncil oftheCity ofCupertinoamendingtheCupertino MunicipalCode”(MCA-2010-06)(seeAttachmentA). Description MunicipalCodeAmendment(MCA-2010-06)toChapter 19.48 (PlannedDevelopment(P) Ordinance),Chapter 19.72(PrivateRecreation(PF)ZoneOrdinance),Chapter 19.124 (Planned DevelopmentPermits,ConditionalUsePermitsandVariancesOrdinance)andChapter 20.04 (SpecificPlansOrdinance) oftheCupertino MunicipalCodeto beconsistentwiththe 2007-2014 Housing Element. Discussion , OnJanuary 4, 2011theCityCouncilmovedtointroducethe ordinanceamendments shownin ExhibitA.Nochangeshave beenmadetotheOrdinance sinceitwaslast presentedforthe Council’sreview. _____________________________________ Preparedby:PiuGhosh,AssociatePlanner Reviewedby:GaryChao,CityPlanner,AartiShrivastava,CommunityDevelopmentDirector ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: A.OrdinanceNo. 11-2073 ORDINANCENO. 11-2073 ANORDINANCEOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCUPERTINO AMENDINGTOCHAPTER 19.48 (PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT(P)ZONES), CHAPTER 19.72 (PRIVATERECREATION(FP)ZONE),CHAPTER 19.124 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENTPERMITS,CONDITIONALUSEPERMITSANDVARIANCES)AND CHAPTER 20.04 (SPECIFICPLANS)OFTHECUPERTINOMUNICIPALCODETO BECONSISTENT WITHTHE 2010 HOUSINGELEMENT. THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCUPERTINOORDAINSASFOLLOWS: Section 1.Statement of Purpose. This ordinanceamendmentclarifieslanguageregarding storageandparking ofvehicles. Section 2.CodeAmendment. 1. Chapter19.48,entitled“PlannedDevelopment(P)Zones,”oftheCupertinoMunicipalCode, isamendedtoreadas shownin Exhibit 1; 2. Sections19.72.040and19.72.050inChapter19.72,entitled“PrivateRecreation(FP)Zone,” oftheCupertino MunicipalCodeareamended,toreadas shownin Exhibit2; 3. Chapter19.124,entitled“PlannedDevelopmentPermits,ConditionalUsePermitsand Variances,” oftheCupertino MunicipalCodeisamended,toreadas shownin Exhibit 3;and 4. Section20.04.040inChapter20.04,entitled“SpecificsPlans,”oftheCupertinoMunicipal Codeisamended,toreadas shownin Exhibit 4. Section 3.Severability. ShouldanyprovisionofthisOrdinance,oritsapplicationtoanypersonorcircumstance,be determined byacourtofcompetentjurisdictiontobeunlawful,unenforceableorotherwisevoid, thatdeterminationshallhavenoeffectonanyotherprovisionofthisOrdinanceorthe applicationofthisOrdinancetoanyotherpersonorcircumstanceand,tothatend,theprovisions hereofareseverable.TheCityCouncildeclaresthatitwouldhaveadoptedthisordinanceand eachsection,subsection,sentence,clause,phraseorportionthereofirrespectiveofthefactthat anyoneormoresections,subsection,sentenceclause,phrasesorportionsbedeclaredvalidor unconstitutional. Section 4.EffectiveDate. ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinforcethirty(30)daysfromandafteradoptionas providedbyGovernmentCodeSection 36937. Section 5.Certification. TheCityClerkshallcertifytothepassageandadoptionofthisOrdinanceandshallgivenotice ofitsadoptionasrequiredbylaw.PursuanttoGovernmentCodeSection36933,asummaryof thisOrdinancemaybepublishedand postedinlieu of publicationand posting oftheentiretext. 1 ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO Section 6.CEQA. Becausethisordinancemakespurelyproceduralchanges,andimprovementstoreadability,this ordinanceisexemptfromCEQAreview pursuanttoCEQAGuidelines section 15061(c)(3). Section 7.Continuity. TotheextenttheprovisionsofthisOrdinancearesubstantiallythesameaspreviousprovisions oftheCupertinoMunicipalCode,theseprovisionsshallbeconstruedascontinuationsofthose provisionsand notasamendments oftheearlierprovisions. INTRODUCED ataregularmeetingoftheCupertinoCityCouncilthe4thdayof ENACTED January2011andataregularmeetingoftheCupertinoCityCouncilonthis____of __________ 2011 bythefollowing vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST:APPROVED: CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino E1 XHIBIT CHAPTER 19.48:PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT(P)ZONES Section 19.48.010Purpose. 19.48.020Applicability ofregulations. 19.48.030 Establishment of districts–Permittedandconditional uses. 19.48.040ZoningorPrezoning. 19.48.050PlannedDevelopmentPermit. 19.48.010Purpose. A. Theplanneddevelopment(P)zoningdistrictisintendedtoprovideameansofguiding landdevelopmentorredevelopmentoftheCitythatisuniquelysuitedforplannedcoordination oflandusesandtoprovideforagreaterflexibilityoflanduseintensityanddesignbecauseof accessibility,ownershippatterns,topographicalconsiderations,andcommunitydesign objectives. B. The planneddevelopmentzoning districtis specificallyintendedtoencouragevarietyin thedevelopmentpatternofthecommunity;topromoteamoredesirablelivingenvironment;to encouragecreativeapproachesinlanddevelopment;toprovideameansofreducingtheamount ofimprovementsrequiredindevelopmentthroughbetterdesignandlandplanning,toconserve naturalfeatures,tofacilitateamoreaestheticandefficientuseofopenspaces,andtoencourage thecreation of public orprivatecommon open space. 19.48.020Applicability ofRegulations. Nobuilding,structureorlandshallbeusedandnobuildingorstructureshallbeerected, enlargedorstructurallyaltered,ordemolished,inanyplanneddevelopmentzoningdistrict, exceptinaccordancewiththe provisions setforthinthischapter. 19.48.030Establishment ofDistricts–Permitted andConditionalUses. A.Planned developmentzoning districtsmay beestablished,modified orremovedfromthe zoningmap,andtheregulationsapplicabletoanyplanneddevelopmentdistrictmaybe established,modified ordeletedinaccordwiththe procedures describedinthischapter. B.AllPdistrictsshallbeidentifiedonthezoningmapwiththelettercoding“P”followed byaspecificreferencetothegeneraltypeofuseallowedintheparticularplanningdevelopment zoningdistrict.Forexample,aplanneddevelopmentzoningdistrictinwhichtheusesaretobe generalcommercialinnature,wouldbedesignated“P(CG).”Aplanneddevelopmentzoning districtinwhichtheusesareintendedtobeamixofgeneralcommercialandresidentialwould be designated“P(CG/Res).” C.PermittedusesinaPzoningdistrictshallconsistofalluseswhicharepermittedinthe zoningdistrictwhichconstitutesthedesignationfollowingthelettercoding“P.”Forexample, thepermittedusesinaP(CG)zoningdistrictarethesameuseswhicharepermittedinaCG zoning district. D.ConditionalusesinaPzoningdistrictshallconsistofalluseswhichrequirethe issuanceofaconditionalusepermitinthezoningdistrictwhichconstitutesthedesignation followingthelettercoding“P.”Forexample,theconditionalusesinaP(CG)zoningdistrictare 1 ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO thesameuseswhichrequireaconditionalusepermitinCGzoningdistrict.Eachconditionaluse inaPzoning districtrequiresa separateconditional use permit. E. ThegeneralcategoryofusesinaPzoneshallbedefinedatthetimeoftheconceptual plan,andshallbeconsistentwiththeadoptedGeneralPlanrelativetothepropertyinthe application.Thedevelopmentstandardsandregulationsofthepermittedandconditionaluses shall beestablishedinconjunctionwiththeapproval oftheconceptualand definitive plans. 19.48.040Zoning or Prezoning. A.Application-TheapplicantforaPzoningdistrictshall,atthetimeoftheapplication, submittotheDirectorofCommunityDevelopmentaconceptualdevelopmentplan,whichwill includeageneraldescriptionoftheproposeduses,theproposedtraffic-circulationsystem,a topographicalmapofthesiteandtheneighboringproperties,alandscapingplan,andanyother informationrequiredbytheDirectorofCommunityDevelopment,thePlanningCommission,or theCityCouncil.TheDirectorofCommunityDevelopmentshallprovidetheapplicantwitha detailedlist ofinformationrequiredforaconceptual development plan. B.ProcessandReviewAuthority – 1.Applicationsforthezoning,prezoningorrezoningofpropertyshallbeprocessedinthe manner prescribedinChapter 19.120 -,AmendmentstotheZoning MapsorZoningRegulations. 2.Uponfinalapprovaloftheapplication,theCityCouncilshallenactanordinancezoning orprezoningthesubjectpropertyorpropertiesasaplanneddevelopmentzone,incorporating within such ordinancetheconceptual planandconditions ofapproval. C.Findings–Nosuchordinancemaybeadoptedunless,inadditiontomakingthefindings requiredbyChapter19.120,AmendmentstotheZoningMapsorZoningRegulations Ordinance,,thefollowingfindingsaremade: 1.Thattheconceptualdevelopmentplanattachedtotheapplicationisconsistentwithboth theGeneralPlanandany underlyingzoningdesignationwhichregulatesthe site; 2.Thattheconceptualdevelopmentplanprovidesforanorganizedandunifiedsystemof landusesandlanduseintensitieswhichwouldbecompatiblewiththesurrounding neighborhood; 3.Thattheconceptualdevelopmentplanforaresidentialuseensuresthattheproposed developmentprovidesadequateactiveandpassiveorientedopenspacewithinthedevelopment tosatisfytheneedsoffutureresidentsand,further,thattheproposeddevelopmentprovides adequatelandscapingthatwillfunctioninamannerwhichwillenhancetheindividual developmentandthecommunityasawhole; 4.Thattheconceptualdevelopmentplanensuresthatthelocationofthesitewithrespectto majorthoroughfaresandusesoutsidethezonewouldnotcreateundueandunreasonabletraffic congestioninthearea; 5.Thattheconceptualdevelopmentplanmakesprovisionsforadequateparking,waste disposaland undergrounding of utilities. D.Modifications-Anymodificationoftheconceptualplanrequiresthesubmissionofa rezoningapplication. ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO 19.48.050.PlannedDevelopmentPermit. A.ProcessandReviewAuthority-Priortoanydevelopmentwithinaplanned development zoningdistrict,theapplicantmustobtainaplanneddevelopmentpermitapprovingthe developmentpursuanttotherequirementsofChapter19.124,PlannedDevelopmentPermits, ConditionalUsePermitsandVariances. B.CombinedApplications-Nothinginthischapterisintendedtoprohibitacombined applicationforzoningandplanneddevelopmentpermittobeconsideredatthesamepublic hearing.CombinedapplicationsshallbeprocessedandreviewedasprovidedbySection 19.04.090,CombinedApplicationforLandUseEntitlements. E2 XHIBIT CHAPTER 19.72:PRIVATERECREATION(FP)ZONE 19.72.040ConditionalUses–UsePermitRequired. Thefollowingusesmaybepermittedinprivaterecreation(FP)zones,subjecttothesecuring ofaconditionalusepermitineachseparatecase.AttheinceptionofarezoningtotheFP classification,suchrezoningshallbeaccompaniedbyasimultaneousrequestforusepermit approval.TheusepermitreviewprocedureshallbeasdescribedinChapter19.124,Planned DevelopmentPermits,ConditionalUsePermitsandVariances. A.OutdoorUsesPermitted byConditionalUsePermitIssuedbythePlanningCommission: 1.Equestriancenterincludingridingacademies, stablesand horserental, 2.Practicerangeforarcheryorfirearms, 3.Golfcoursewith orwithout drivingrange, 4.Swimandracquetclub, 5.Swimming, diving orrelated sportscenter, 6.Picnicareas, 7.Racquet sportscenterfortennis,racquetball, badmintonand similaractivities, 8.Specialtyoutdooractivitycenterencompassingoneormoreofthefollowingorsimilar uses: a.Roller skating, b.Skateboarding, c.Lawn bowling, bocce ball, d.Miniaturegolf, e.Waterslide, 9.Commercialathleticfieldfor one ormore ofthefollowing or similar uses: a.Baseball, softball or battingcagetraining, b.Football, c.Soccer, d.Volleyball, e.Field hockey, f.Basketball, 10.Amusement parkswithorwithoutrides orliveentertainment, 11.Bicyclemotocrosscourse/go-carttrackorsimilarspecialtyraceway,butexcluding facilitiesforracing ofautomobiles ormotorcycles, 12.Airsportsfieldforhanggliding,ultralightaircraftorballooning,butexcludingcommon carrier passengeraircraftservice, 4 ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO 13.OtheroutdoorrecreationuseswhicharefoundbytheCityCouncilorPlanning Commissiontobeofsimilarintensityandcharacteristicsofusetothoseenumeratedinthis subdivision; B.IndoorUsesPermittedbyConditionalUsePermitIssuedbythePlanningCommission: 1.Museumsand galleries, 2.Theatersforfilm, stageormusicentertainment, 3. Specialtyindooractivitycenterencompassingoneormoreofthefollowingorsimilar uses: a.Bowling, b.Video games, c.Pool, billiards, d.Martialarts, e.Ice orroller skatingrink, 4.Personalfitnessorsportstrainingcenterwithprimarylocationoffacilitiesandequipment enclosedwithina structure, 5.Dancehall orfacilityfordanceinstruction, 6.OtherindoorrecreationuseswhicharefoundbytheCityCouncilorPlanning Commissiontobeofsimilarintensityandcharacteristicsofusetothoseenumeratedinthis subsection. E3 XHIBIT CHAPTER19.124:PLANNEDDEVELOPMENTPERMITS,CONDITIONALUSE PERMITSANDVARIANCES Section 19.124.010Authority oftheDirector ofCommunityDevelopment. 19.124.020Applicationfor planneddevelopment permit. 19.124.030Applicationforconditional use permit or variance. 19.124.040ActionbytheDirector. 19.124.050Notice of public hearing. 19.124.060ActionbythePlanningCommission. 19.124.070ActionbytheCityCouncil. 19.124.080Planneddevelopmentpermitandconditionalusepermit–Findingsand conditions. 19.124.090Variance–Findingsandconditions. 19.124.100 Effectivedate. 19.124.110 Expiration,extensionandrevocation. 19.124.120 Expansion of planned development orconditional uses. 19.124.130Changeof use. 19.124.140Concurrentapplications. 19.124.010Authority oftheDirector ofCommunityDevelopment. Subjecttotheprovisionsofthischapterandgeneralpurposeandintentofthistitle,the Director ofCommunityDevelopmentmaygrantthefollowing: A.AnydevelopmentpermitswhichareauthorizedtobeissuedbytheDirectorpursuantto anyprovisionofthistitle.Allotherplanneddevelopmentpermitsandconditionalusepermits shall beissuedbyeitherthePlanningCommission ortheCityCouncil,asprovidedbythistitle; B.Avariancefromthesitedevelopmentregulationsandparkingandloadingregulations (exceptthosehandicappedparkingregulationsmandatedbyStatelaw)applicablewithinany districtestablishedbythistitle; C.Avariancefromthespecialconditionsthatapplytositedevelopmentandparkingand loadingregulations(includingconditionsattachedtoplanneddevelopments)applicablewithin any districtestablishedbythistitle. D.Arequestforreasonableaccommodationmadebyanypersonwithadisability,when thestrictapplicationoftheprovisionswithinresidentialdistricts,actasabarriertofairhousing opportunities, pursuanttoChapter 19.50. 19.124.020ApplicationforPlannedDevelopment Permit A.Anapplicationforaplanneddevelopmentpermit,maybemadebytheownerofrecord, or hisagent, of propertyforwhichthe planneddevelopmentis sought. 6 ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO B.ApplicationshallbemadetotheDirector,onaformprovidedbytheCity,andshall containthefollowing: 1.Adescriptionandmapshowingthelocationofthepropertyforwhichthepermitis sought; 2.Adefinitivedevelopmentplan,consistentwiththeconceptualdevelopmentplanand conditions ofapproval ofthezoning,fortheentire property; 3.Architecturaldrawings ofthe proposeddevelopment; 4. Maps showingthelocations of buildings; 5.Renderings showing buildingheightsand squarefootages; 6. Maps showingthe preciselocation ofroads, streets,alleysandaccess points; 7.Atrafficanalysis;and 8.Aconstructionplan, 9.SuchadditionalinformationastheDirectormaydeempertinentandessentialtothe application. C.ApplicationshallbeaccompaniedbythefeeprescribedbyCityCouncilresolution,no part ofwhich shall bereturnabletotheapplicant. 19.124.030ApplicationforConditionalUsePermit orVariance. InadditiontoallinformationrequiredpursuanttoSection19.124.020,ApplicationforPlanned DevelopmentPermit,thefollowinginformationshall be provided: A.Iftheapplicationisforaconditional usepermit, plansand/ordescriptions ofexistingand proposedusesoftheproperty,anddescribingindetailthenatureoftheuseproposaltobe conducted on the property; B.Iftheapplicationisforavariance,plansand/ordescriptionsofexistingandproposed constructiononthepropertyinvolved,togetherwithastatementofthecircumstanceswhich justifythe variousapplications. 19.124.040ActionbytheDirector. A.UnlessotherwiseprovidedbySection19.04.090,CombinedApplicationforLandUse Entitlements,thefollowingactionsshallbetakenbytheDirectortoprocessanapplicationfora planned developmentpermit,conditional use permit or variance: 1.Uponreceiptofacompleteapplicationforaplanneddevelopmentpermit,conditionaluse permitorvariance,theDirectorshall,withinthirtydaysfromthedatetheapplicationis deemedbytheDirectortobecomplete,setadateforapublichearinguponthematterata regularorspecialmeetingofthePlanningCommission,unlesstheapplicationisdivertedfor administrativeapproval,pursuanttoChapter19.132,AdministrativeApprovalofMinor ChangesinProjects.Thepublichearingshallcommencewithinsixtydaysofthedateitis set.Iftheapplicationisforaplanneddevelopmentpermitforanindividualsingle-storyor two-storysinglefamilyresidencethatdirectlyincorporatesChapter19.28(SingleFamily Residential(R1)Zones)standards,theDirector shalldiverttheapplicationtobe processedas setforthinChapter19.134,ArchitecturalandSiteReview,forapprovalbytheDesign ReviewCommittee. ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO B.TheDirectorshallendeavortoforwardawrittenreporttotheCityCouncilandPlanning Commissionoftheactionhe/shehastakenoneachapplicationforplanneddevelopmentpermit, conditional use permitsand variances. 19.124.050Notice ofPublicHearing. Noticeofanypublic hearingunderthischaptershallbegiveninthesamemannerasprovided inChapter 19.120, AmendmentstotheZoning MapsandZoningRegulations, ofthistitle. 19.124.060Decision afterHearing. A.Atthetimeand place setfor hearing,theDirector,PlanningCommission orCity Council,asthecasemaybe, shall hearevidencefor oragainst suchapplication.Withina reasonabletimeaftertheconclusion ofthe hearing,theDirector,Commission orCouncil shall makefindingsand shallrenderadecision on theapplicationwhichis supportedbytheevidence containedintheapplication or presentedatthe hearing. B.IntheeventthatthedecisionbytheDirector, ortheCommission,isafinal one,then such decisionis subjecttotheappeal procedurescontainedinChapter 19.136, Appeals. 19.124.070.ActionbythePlanningCommission. A.Forplanneddevelopmentpermits,thePlanningCommissionisthefinaldecisionmaking bodyiftheapplicationisfornewdevelopmentoflessthanfivethousandsquarefeetof commercialorlessthantenthousandsquarefeetforindustrialand/orofficeuse,orlessthan eightresidentialunits.Forallotherplanneddevelopmentpermitapplications,thePlanning Commission shallmakearecommendationtotheCityCouncil. B.ForallpermitssubjecttothisChapterexceptthoseregulatedbysubsectionAofthis section19.124.070,thereviewprocessshallbeasspecifiedintheChapterofthiscodethat specifiesthezoningclassificationthatappliestothe propertyin question. C.TheDirectorshallendeavortoforwardawrittenreportdescribingPlanningCommission decisionstotheCityCouncilwithinfivecalendardaysfromthedateofthedecision.Ifa PlanningCommissiondecisionisadvisorytotheCityCouncil,theDirectorshallendeavorto forwardthePlanningCommission’srecommendationsandfindingstotheCityCouncilwithin fifteen daysoftheCommission’s decision. 19.124.070ActionbytheCityCouncil. UponreceiptofarecommendationofthePlanningCommission,theCityCouncilmay approve,modify, or disapprovetherecommendation ofthePlanningCommission. 19.124.080PlannedDevelopmentPermit andConditionalUsePermit–Findings and Conditions. A. Thedecisionmakermaygranta planneddevelopment permit oraconditional use permit onlyifall ofthefollowingfindingsaremade: 1.Theproposeddevelopmentand/oruse,attheproposedlocation,willnotbedetrimental orinjurioustopropertyorimprovementsinthevicinity,andwillnotbedetrimentaltothepublic health, safety,generalwelfare, orconvenience; 2.Theproposeddevelopmentand/orusewillbelocatedandconductedinamannerin ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO accordwiththeCupertinoComprehensiveGeneralPlan,underlyingzoningregulations,andthe purpose ofthistitle. B.Thedecisionmakermayimposewithreasonableconditionsorrestrictionsashedeems necessarytosecurethepurposeofthistitleandtoassureoperationofthedevelopmentand/or useinamannercompatiblewithexistingandpotentialusesonadjoiningpropertiesandinthe general vicinity. C.Permitsareapprovedforatwo-yearperiodoralongerperiodoftimetobedetermined bythedecision-makingbody. 19.124.090Variance–Findings andConditions. A.TheDirectormaygrantavariancefromthesitedevelopmentregulations,theparking andloadingregulationsorthespecialrequirementsofthistitleapplicablewithinanydistrict,if theDirectorfinds: 1.Therearespecialcircumstancesapplicabletotheproperty(includingsize,shape, topography,location orsurroundings)that do notapplygenerallyto propertyinthe same district; 2.Thespecialcircumstancesapplicabletothepropertydeprivethepropertyofprivileges enjoyedby other propertyinthe vicinityand underidenticalzoningclassification. 3.Theissuanceofthevariancewillnotconstituteagrantofspecialprivilegesinconsistent withthelimitationsuponotherpropertiesinthevicinityandzoninginwhichsuchpropertyis situated. 4. Thevarianceisnotbeingissuedforthepurposeofallowingausethatisnototherwise expresslyauthorizedbythezoneregulationgoverningthe parcelofthe property. 5.Thegrantingoftheapplicationwillnotbedetrimentalorinjurioustopropertyor improvementsinthevicinityandwillnotbedetrimentaltothepublichealth,safety,andgeneral welfare, orconvenience,andto securethe purpose ofthetitle. 19.124.100EffectiveDate. Aplanneddevelopmentpermit,conditionaluseorvarianceshalltakeeffecttenworkingdays followingthemailingofthenoticeofdecision,unlessanappealisfiledasprovidedinChapter 19.136,Appeals. 19.124.110Expiration,Extension andRevocation. A.Expiration. 1.Aplanneddevelopmentpermit,conditionalusepermitorvariancewhichhasnotbeen usedwithintwoyearsfollowingitsissuance,shallbecomenullandvoidandofnoeffect,unless ashorterorlongertimeperiodisspecificallyprescribedintheconditionsofsuchpermitor variance.Apermitorvarianceshallbedeemedtobe"used"whenactualsubstantialand continuousactivityhastakenplaceuponthelandsubjecttothepermitorvarianceor,inthe eventoftheerectionofastructureorstructures,whensufficientbuildingactivityhasoccurred andcontinuesto occurina diligentmanner. 2.Notwithstandingsubsection1ofthissection,iftheuseforwhichaconditionaluse permitwasgrantedandutilizedhasceasedorhasbeensuspendedforoneyearormore,said permit becomes nullandvoid. ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO 3.Unlessavariancehasexpiredpursuanttosubsection1ofthissection,itshallcontinue toexistforthelifeoftheexistingstructureorsuchstructureasmaybeconstructedpursuantto thevarianceapprovalunlessadifferenttimeperiodisspecifiedinitsissuance.Avariancefrom theparkingandloadingregulationsshallbevalidonlyduringtheperiodofcontinuous operations ofthe useand/or structureforwhichthe variancewasissued. B.Extensions.Thedecisionmakergrantingtheoriginalplanneddevelopmentpermit, conditionalusepermitorvariancemay,withoutpublichearing,extendthetimefortheuseof suchpermitorvarianceforamaximumofoneyearonly,uponapplicationfiledbytheapplicant withtheDirectorpriortoexpiration.Upontimelyfilingofanextensionrequestwiththe Director,thetimeforwhichapermitorvariancemustbeusedshallbeautomaticallyextended untiltherequestis heard bythedecisionmaker. C.Revocation.Inanycasewhere,inthejudgmentoftheDirector,substantialevidence indicatesthattheconditionsofaplanneddevelopmentpermit,conditionalusepermitorvariance havenotbeenimplemented,orwherethepermitorvarianceisbeingconductedinamanner detrimentaltothepublichealth,safety,andwelfare,theDirectorshallsetadateforapublic hearingbeforethedecisionmakergrantingtheoriginalpermitorvariance,andnoticeapublic hearinginaccordancewithSection 19.124.050, Notice ofPublicHearing,ofthiscode. 19.124.120ExpansionorModification ofPlannedDevelopment orConditionalUse Permits. A.Anysignificantexpansioninbuildingsizeonsiteareaofaplanneddevelopmentorany significantincreaseofaconditionaluseshallnecessitatetheissuanceofanewplanned developmentpermitorconditionalusepermitfortheexpansioninaccordwiththeprovisionsof thischapter. B.Anymodificationtoapreviouslyapprovedplanned development permitshallrequirean applicationforamodificationtotheoriginalpermitandshallbeprocessedpursuanttothe requirementsofthisChapter,unlesstheapplicationisdivertedforadministrativeapproval, pursuanttoChapter 19.132,AdministrativeApproval of MinorChangesinProjects. C.Noapplicationsforaplanneddevelopmentpermitorconditionalusepermitshallbe necessaryforexistinguseswhichwerelawfulconformingpermittedusesandwhichwere renderedconditional byreasonofrezoningorchangetothistitle,providedthatanyexpansionin the building site or sitearea of such use shall be subjecttotheissuanceofaplanned development permit orconditional use permitinaccordwiththischapter. 19.124.130Change ofUse. 1. Achangefromaconditionaluseorapermittedusetoanotherpermitteduserequiresa modificationoftheplanneddevelopmentpermit,unlesstheproposedusedoesnotchangethe generalappearanceoftheprojectanddoesnotchangehowthepropertyinteractswith neighboringproperties. 2.Achangefroma permitted use oraconditionally permitted usetoa differentconditional userequirestheissuanceof separateconditionaluse permit. 19.124.140ConcurrentApplications. Notwithstandinganyprovisioninthistitletothecontrary,anyapplicationforaplanned developmentpermit,conditionalusepermitorvariancewhichwouldnormallybeissuedbythe ON.11-2073 RDINANCEO DirectorofCommunityDevelopmentorthePlanningCommissionmay,atthediscretionofthe Director,beprocessedconcurrentlywithapplicationsforGeneralPlanamendments,zoning changes, subdivisionmaps or otherapprovalswhichrequireCityCouncilapproval. E4 XHIBIT CHAPTER 20.04:SPECIFICPLANS 20.04.040ZoningDistrictApplicableto a SpecificPlan. Allareasgovernedbyaspecificplanshallbezonedasaplanneddevelopment(P)zoning districtunderChapter19.48oftheCity’sOrdinanceCodeandallregulationsgoverninglanduse approvalsinaplanneddevelopmentzoneshallbeapplicabletospecificplans.Aproposalfor specificplanmaybecombinedwithanyapplicationforlanduseentitlementsintheCity’s planned developmentzoning districts. 12