4-5-11 CC Packet.pdf
Table of Contents
Agenda4
March 15 City Council minutes
03151112
Payroll for period ending March 4, 2011
Draft Resolution21
Payroll for period ending March 18, 2011
Draft Resolution22
Accounts Payable for period ending March 4, 2011
Draft Resolution23
Accounts Payable for period ending March 11, 2011
Draft Resolution29
Accounts payable for period ending March 18, 2011
Draft Resolution46
City Project, Pavement Restoration, Project No. 2009-08
Staff Report54
A - Pavement Restoration Location List55
Development Agreement, Mimi Tsui, 10292 Orange Avenue
Resolution56
Agreement58
Map72
Development Agreement, Jerry Jin-Tzong Liu and Jennifer Fang
Fang, 21835 Lomita Ave
Resolution73
Agreement75
Map89
Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water
Rights, Mimi Tsui, 10292 Orange Avenue
Resolution90
Quitclaim Deed91
Map95
Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water
Rights, Hantyng Kenneth Hsieh and Jean Lai, 20557 Blossom
Lane
Resolution96
Quitclaim Deed97
Map101
Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water
Rights, Paul A. Lassa and Palmyra S. Pawlik, 21700 Alcazar
Ave
Resolution102
Quitclaim Deed103
Map106
1
Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water
Rights, Jerry Jin-Tzong Liu and Jennifer Fang Fang, 21835
Lomita Ave
Resolution107
Quitclaim Deed108
Map112
Grant of Easement for Roadway Purposes, Mimi Tsui, 10292
Orange Avenue
Resolution113
Grant of Easement114
Map118
Grant of Easement for Streetlight Purposes, Vincent C. Wong
Senior and Vincent C. Wong Junior, 18996 Pendergast Avenue
Resolution119
Grant of Easement120
Map124
Grant of Easement for Roadway Purposes, Jerry Jin-Tzong Liu
and Jennifer Fang Fang, 21835 Lomita Avenue
Resolution125
Grant of Easement126
Map130
Alcoholic Beverage License, Bonjour Sandwiches & Crepes,
20371 Stevens Creek Boulevard (near Torre)
Staff Report131
Application for Alcoholic Beverage License132
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, Human
Service grants, and FY 2011 Annual Action Plan
Staff Report133
Attachment A137
Attachment B156
Attachment C157
Fiscal Year 2011/12 Fee Schedule
Staff Report170
Resolution173
Fee Schedule Table of Contents174
Fee Schedule A - General175
Fee Schedule B - Engineering178
Fee Schedule C - Planning181
Fee Schedule D - Building184
Fee Schedule E - Recreation217
Alternative Bridge Locations and Trail Alignments for Stevens
Creek Corridor Project Phase II
Staff Report227
A - Bridge Location Alternatives230
B - Stocklmeir Task Force Meeting Notes231
Petition for reconsideration for a personal wireless service
facility at 11371 Bubb Road (continued from March 15)
2
T-Mobile/Bubb Road Reconsideration Report235
A. City Council Resolution & Exhibit 1242
B. Director's Minor Mod Approval dated 9/7/10249
C. Appeal by Shaul Berger dated 9/20/10253
D. PC Staff Report dated 11/9/10258
E. PC Meeting Minutes dated 11/9/10263
F. PC Resolution No. 6616269
G. CC Staff Report dated 11/29/10272
H. CC Meeting Minutes dated 11/29/10275
I. Reconsideration Petition dated 12/9/10277
J. Email from Shaul Berger to City staff dated 11/30/10283
K. Email from Shaul Berger regarding radiation analysis
dated 1/27/11284
L. Response Letter from Hammett & Edison dated
1/31/11288
M. Email from Hammett & Edison to Shaul Berger dated
2/11/11289
N. Email from Shaul Berger to City staff dated 3/21/11292
O. Plan Set293
Department of Energy grant for an electric vehicle charging
station at City Hall
EV_Charging_Station_Staff_Report303
Attachment_A_Networked.Charging.Stations310
Attachment_B_Network.Standard.Service314
Attachment_C_Grant.Award318
Attachment_D_Reporting.Guide326
Attachment_E_REJ.Installation.Proposal335
Attachment_F_Subscription.Agreement336
2011 Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan
Staff Report353
A - Resolution355
B - Bicycle Transportation Plan356
Resignations of Fine Arts Commissioner Joelle Lieb, and
Technology, Information, and Communications Commissioner
William Allen
Staff Report423
3
AGENDA
CUPERTINOCITYCOUNCIL ~ REGULARMEETING
CUPERTINOREDEVELOPMENTAGENCY ~ REGULARMEETING
10350TorreAvenue,CommunityHallCouncilChamber
Tuesday,April 5, 2011
6:45PM
CITYCOUNCILMEETING
PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
CLOSEDSESSION
CEREMONIALMATTERS – PRESENTATIONS
1.Subject:ProclamationrecognizingMichaelGottwaldforsupportingtheyouthinthe
communityandfor hisfund-raisingeffortsformajorcharities
RecommendedAction:Present proclamation
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
2.Subject:Councilrecognition ofCupertino'sGreenLeaders
RecommendedAction:RecognizeGreenCitizenoftheYear&Cupertino'sGreen
Businesses,andannounce EarthDayFestival
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
3.Subject:AwardfortheOutstandingPark&RecreationProjectinCalifornia,2010,from
AmericanSociety ofCivil EngineersforStevensCreekCorridorPark
RecommendedAction:Presentaward
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
4.Subject:PresentationfromthePlanningCommission
RecommendedAction:Accept presentation.
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
POSTPONEMENTS
WRITTENCOMMUNICATIONS
4
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
ORALCOMMUNICATIONS
Thisportionofthemeetingisreservedforpersonswishingtoaddressthecouncilonanymatter
notontheagenda.Speakersarelimitedtothree(3)minutes.Inmostcases,Statelawwill
prohibitthecouncilfrommakingany decisionswithrespecttoamatter notlisted on theagenda.
CONSENTCALENDAR
Unlessthereareseparatediscussionsand/oractionsrequestedbycouncil,stafforamemberof
the public,itisrequestedthatitems undertheConsentCalendar beacted on simultaneously.
5.Subject: March 15 CityCouncilminutes
RecommendedAction:Approveminutes
031511
Page:
6.Subject:Payrollfor periodending March 4, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-039
DraftResolution
Page:
7.Subject:Payrollfor periodending March 18, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-040
DraftResolution
Page:
8.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodending March 4, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-041
DraftResolution
Page:
9.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodending March 11, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-042
DraftResolution
Page:
10.Subject:Accounts payablefor periodending March 18, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-043
DraftResolution
Page:
11.Subject:CityProject,PavementRestoration,ProjectNo. 2009-08
RecommendedAction:AcceptProjectNo. 2009-08
StaffReport
A-PavementRestorationLocationList
Page:
5
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
12.Subject:DevelopmentAgreement, Mimi Tsui, 10292 OrangeAvenue
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-044
Description:ThroughthedevelopmentagreementwiththeCity,theapplicantforabuilding
permitforasingle-familyresidentialdevelopmentwillbeobligatedtobondandconstruct
city-specifiedroadsideimprovementsalongthe streetfrontage oftheir building site
Resolution
Agreement
Map
Page:
13.Subject:DevelopmentAgreement,JerryJin-TzongLiuandJenniferFangFang,21835
LomitaAve
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-045
Description:ThroughthedevelopmentagreementwiththeCity,theapplicantforabuilding
permitforasingle-familyresidentialdevelopmentwillbeobligatedtobondandconstruct
city-specifiedroadsideimprovementsalongthe streetfrontage oftheir building site
Resolution
Agreement
Map
Page:
14.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,MimiTsui,
10292OrangeAvenue
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-046
Description:ThepropertyownerofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreestogranttotheCity
therighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property
Resolution
QuitclaimDeed
Map
Page:
15.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,Hantyng
KennethHsiehandJeanLai, 20557 BlossomLane
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-047
Description:ThepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCity
therighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property
Resolution
QuitclaimDeed
Map
Page:
6
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
16.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,PaulA.Lassa
andPalmyraS.Pawlik, 21700 AlcazarAve
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-048
Description:ThepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCity
therighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property
Resolution
QuitclaimDeed
Map
Page:
17.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,JerryJin-Tzong
LiuandJenniferFangFang, 21835 LomitaAve
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-049
Description:ThepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCity
therighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property
Resolution
QuitclaimDeed
Map
Page:
18.Subject:Grant of EasementforRoadwayPurposes, Mimi Tsui, 10292 OrangeAvenue
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-050
Description:ThepropertyownerofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCityan
easementforpublicroadwaypurposes,togetherwiththerighttoconstruct,operate,repair
andmaintain public utilitiesandimprovements, overa portion ofthe property
Resolution
Grant of Easement
Map
Page:
19.Subject:GrantofEasementforStreetlightPurposes,VincentC.WongSeniorandVincent
C.WongJunior, 18996 PendergastAvenue
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-051
Description:ThepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCityan
easementforstreetlightpurposes,togetherwiththerighttoconstruct,operate,repairand
maintain streetlightimprovements, overa portion ofthe property
Resolution
Grant of Easement
Map
Page:
7
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
20.Subject:GrantofEasementforRoadwayPurposes,JerryJin-TzongLiuandJenniferFang
Fang, 21835 LomitaAvenue
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-052
Description:ThepropertyownerofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttotheCityan
easementforpublicroadwaypurposes,togetherwiththerighttoconstruct,operate,repair
andmaintain public utilitiesandimprovements, overa portion ofthe property
Resolution
Grant of Easement
Map
Page:
21.Subject:AlcoholicBeverageLicense,BonjourSandwiches&Crepes,20371StevensCreek
Boulevard(near Torre)
RecommendedAction:ApproveapplicationforOn-SaleBeer&WineforBonaFidePublic
EatingPlace
StaffReport
ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicense
Page:
ITEMSREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTCALENDAR(above)
PUBLICHEARINGS
22.Subject:CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CDBG)funds,HumanServicegrants,and
FY 2011 AnnualActionPlan
RecommendedAction:Conductpublichearingandcontinuefinalapprovalofthefunding
allocationsandFY2011AnnualActionPlantoMay3inordertocompletethe30-day
review period
Description:Thisisthefirstoftworequiredpublichearingsregardinguseof2011-12CDBG
funds,HumanServicegrants,andtheFY 2011 AnnualActionPlan
StaffReport
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Page:
8
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
23.Subject:FiscalYear 2011/12FeeSchedule
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-053,approvingthe 2011-12fee schedule.
StaffReport
Resolution
FeeSchedule Table ofContents
FeeScheduleA-General
FeeScheduleB- Engineering
FeeScheduleC-Planning
FeeScheduleD-Building
FeeSchedule E -Recreation
Page:
UNFINISHEDBUSINESS
24.Subject:AlternativeBridgeLocationsandTrailAlignmentsforStevensCreekCorridor
ProjectPhaseII
RecommendedAction:AdopttheBaseAlignmentbridgelocationandageneraltrail
alignmentbetweenthesecondrowoforchardtreesandthecreekriparianzoneforthe
StevensCreekCorridorParkPhaseII
StaffReport
A-BridgeLocationAlternatives
B-Stocklmeir TaskForce MeetingNotes
Page:
NEWBUSINESS
25.Subject:Petitionforreconsiderationforapersonalwirelessservicefacilityat11371Bubb
Road(continuedfrom March 15)
RecommendedAction:ConducthearingandadoptResolutionNo.11-054,denyingthe
petitionforreconsideration
Description:Application:DIR-2010-28Reconsideration;Applicant:DaynaAguirre(forT-
Mobile);Petitioner:ShaulBerger;Location:11371BubbRoad,APN356-23-047;
ApplicationSummary:PetitionforreconsiderationoftheCityCouncil’sNovember29,2010
decisiontodenyanappealofaDirector'sApprovalforapersonalwirelessservicefacility
withthreepanelantennasandfourassociatedequipmentboxestobeinstalledonanexisting
PG&E polelocatedinfront of 11371 BubbRoad
T-Mobile/BubbRoadReconsiderationReport
A.CityCouncilResolution& Exhibit 1
B.Director's Minor Mod Approval dated 9/7/10
C.Appeal byShaulBerger dated 9/20/10
D.PCStaffReport dated 11/9/10
E.PC Meeting Minutes dated 11/9/10
F.PCResolutionNo. 6616
G.CCStaffReport dated 11/29/10
H.CC Meeting Minutes dated 11/29/10
9
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
I.ReconsiderationPetition dated 12/9/10
J. EmailfromShaulBergertoCity staff dated 11/30/10
K. EmailfromShaulBergerregardingradiationanalysis dated 1/27/11
L.ResponseLetterfromHammett& Edison dated 1/31/11
M. EmailfromHammett& EdisontoShaulBerger dated 2/11/11
N. EmailfromShaulBergertoCity staff dated 3/21/11
O.PlanSet
Page:
26.Subject:Department of Energygrantforanelectric vehiclecharging stationatCityHall
RecommendedAction:AcceptDepartmentofEnergygrantandauthorizetheCityManager
tonegotiateandexecutethenecessaryagreementswithCoulombTechnologies,Inc.,and
REJ ElectricCompanyin substantiallythe sameformasattached
EV_Charging_Station_Staff_Report
Attachment_A_Networked.Charging.Stations
Attachment_B_Network.Standard.Service
Attachment_C_Grant.Award
Attachment_D_Reporting.Guide
Attachment_E_REJ.Installation.Proposal
Attachment_F_Subscription.Agreement
Page:
27.Subject: 2011 CupertinoBicycle TransportationPlan
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo.11-055,approvingthe2011CupertinoBicycle
TransportationPlan
StaffReport
A-Resolution
B-Bicycle TransportationPlan
Page:
28.Subject:CancellationofApril19CityCouncilmeetingandschedulingofBudgetStudy
Session
RecommendedAction:ConsidercancelingmeetingofApril19andscheduleBudgetStudy
Session between May 23 andJune 2
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
29.Subject:ResignationsofFineArtsCommissionerJoelleLieb,andTechnology,Information,
andCommunicationsCommissionerWilliamAllen
RecommendedAction:Acceptresignationsand,iftheApril19Councilmeetingis
cancelled, direct staffto setinterview deadlines
StaffReport
Page:
10
Tuesday,April 5, 2011CupertinoCityCouncil
CupertinoRedevelopmentAgency
30.Subject:Datefor study sessionregardingteleconferencing
RecommendedAction:Select May 3 beginningat 6:00
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
31.Subject:DateforCity Managerevaluation
RecommendedAction:Set dateforclosed session on May 12 beginningat 5:00PM
Page:Nowrittenmaterialsin packet
ORDINANCES
STAFFREPORTS
COUNCILREPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
REDEVELOPMENTAGENCYMEETING
Canceledforlack of business.
TheCityofCupertinohasadoptedtheprovisionsofCodeofCivilProcedure§1094.6;litigation
challengingafinaldecisionoftheCityCouncil/RedevelopmentAgencymustbebroughtwithin90days
aftera decisionisannounced unlessa shortertimeisrequired byState orFederallaw.
Anyinterestedperson,includingtheapplicant,priortoseekingjudicialreviewofthecitycouncil’s
decisionwithrespecttoquasi-judicialactions,mustfirstfileapetitionforreconsiderationwiththecity
clerkwithintendaysafterthecouncil’sdecision.Anypetitionsofiledmustcomplywithmunicipal
ordinancecode §2.08.096.
IncompliancewiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA),theCityofCupertinowillmake
reasonableeffortstoaccommodatepersonswithqualifieddisabilities.Ifyourequirespecialassistance,
pleasecontactthecityclerk’s officeat 408-777-3223atleast 48 hoursinadvance ofthemeeting.
AnywritingsordocumentsprovidedtoamajorityoftheCupertinoCityCouncilafterpublicationofthe
packetwillbemadeavailableforpublicinspectionintheCityClerk’sOfficelocatedatCityHall,10300
TorreAvenue,duringnormalbusinesshoursandinCouncilpacketarchiveslinkedfromthe
agenda/minutes page on theCupertinoweb site.
11
DRAFTMINUTES
CUPERTINOCITYCOUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
CITYCOUNCILMEETING
PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE
At6:48p.m.MayorGilbertWongcalledtheregularmeetingtoorderintheCouncilChamber,
10350 TorreAvenue,Cupertino,California,andledthePledge ofAllegiance.
ROLLCALL
Present:MayorGilbertWong,Vice-MayorMarkSantoro,andCouncilmembersBarryChang
Orrin Mahoney,andKrisWang.Absent:None.
CLOSEDSESSION-None
STUDYSESSION
1.Subject:StudysessionregardingtrailalignmentforStevensCreekTrailCorridorProject
PhaseII
RecommendedAction:Conduct study session
WrittencommunicationsforthisitemincludedastaffPowerPointpresentationon
alternativetrailalignments.
PublicWorksDirectorTimmBordenreviewedthePowerPointpresentation.He
highlightedtheBaseTrailAlignmentprosandcons;Alternatives1and2–Westside
Trail prosandcons,andAlignment 3 – Eastside Trail prosandcons.
Councilconcurredtotake publiccommentwithItemNo. 13.
12
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 2
CEREMONIALMATTERS – PRESENTATIONS-None
POSTPONEMENTS
DeputyCityClerkGraceSchmidtnotedthattherewasarequestto postponeItemNo. 12 toApril
5.
LeslieFowler said sheagreedtheitem should be postponed so thattheexpertscan beavailableto
addressthecelltower beforeitisinstalled.
SantoromovedandWangsecondedtopostponeitemNo.12toApril5attherequestofthe
appellantwiththeconcurrenceofapplicant.Thisitemisregardinga personalwirelessfacility on
BubbRoad. Themotioncarried unanimously.
WRITTENCOMMUNICATIONS
Schmidt distributedthefollowingwrittencommunications:
·A staffPowerPoint presentation on alternativetrailalignments(ItemNos. 1 and 13)
·Anamendmentto page 8 oftheminutes ofFebruary 15 (ItemNo. 2)
·Arevisedcopy ofthe draft ordinance(ItemNo. 14)
·AtypedlistofcommentsfromDarrylLumopposingtheproposedchangeinprocedure
(itemNo. 14)
·AnemailfromKeithMurphyopposedtoalteringthereconsiderationprocess(ItemNo.
14)
MayorWongreorderedtheagendatotake up theConsentCalendar next.
CONSENTCALENDAR
WangmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovetheitemsontheConsentCalendaras
recommended,withthecorrectiontotheminutesofFeb.15.Ayes:Chang,Mahoney,Santoro,
Wang,andWong.Noes:None.Abstain:None.
2.Subject:February 15 CityCouncilminutes
RecommendedAction:Approveminutes
Writtencommunicationsincludedanamendmentto page 8 oftheminutes ofFebruary 15.
3.Subject: March 1 CityCouncilminutes
RecommendedAction:Approveminutes
4.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingFebruary 18, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-033\\
13
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 3
5.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingFebruary 25, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-034
6.Subject:Payrollfor periodendingFebruary 18, 2011
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-035
7.Subject:Approve destruction ofrecordsfromtheCityClerk department
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-036
8.Subject:AlcoholicBeverageLicense,BombayOven,20803StevensCreekBoulevard
(nearSaich)
RecommendedAction:ApproveapplicationforOn-SaleBeer&Wine
9.Subject:AlcoholicBeverageLicense,ShanghaiGardenRestaurant,20956Homestead
Road,SuitesA2&A3(OakmontSquareatHomestead&Stelling)
RecommendedAction:ApproveapplicationforOn-SaleBeer&Wine
10.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,SI24,LLC,
10600NorthDeAnzaBlvd
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-037
Description:Thepropertyownerofthiscommercialdevelopmentagreestogranttothe
Citytherighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property
11.Subject:QuitclaimDeedandAuthorizationforUndergroundWaterRights,SureshR.
TammanaandSubhaP. Tammana, 22140 HibiscusDrive
RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 11-038
Description:Thepropertyownersofthisresidentialdevelopmentagreetogranttothe
Citytherighttoextractwaterfromthe basin underthe overlying property
ITEMSREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTCALENDAR(above)-None
PUBLICHEARINGS – None
UNFINISHEDBUSINESS-None
NEWBUSINESS
12.Subject:PetitionforreconsiderationoftheCityCouncil’sNovember29,2010decision
todenyanappeal ofaDirector'sApprovalfora personalwireless servicefacilityat 11371
BubbRoad(continuedfromFebruary 1)
RecommendedAction:ContinuetoApril5atrequestofappellantwiththeconcurrence
ofapplicant
Under“Postponements”thisitemwas postponedtoApril 5.
14
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 4
13.Subject:AlternativetrailalignmentsforStevensCreekCorridorProjectPhaseII
RecommendedAction:Authorizestafftoproceedwiththebridgeandtrailalignmentas
generally depictedintheapprovedJune 2006 StevensCreekCorridorPark MasterPlan
WrittencommunicationsincludedastaffPowerPointpresentationonalternativetrail
alignments.
DeborahJamisonsaidthatshecouldspeakonbehalfoftheentireconservation
communityinurgingCounciltokeepthecreekandtheriparianplantrestorationahigh
priorityinthisproject.ShealsourgedCounciltoputthetrailalignmentnottoocloseto
thecreekandriparianwoodlandbecausehumanpresencewouldhaveanimpacton
wildlife useinthearea.
DonnaAustinsaidthatshewantstoseethecreekrestoredandthetrailbuilt,butshewas
concernedthatthetrail not bemade ofcement duetoirrigationandtreerootissues.
TomDyer,ChairoftheStocklmeirTrailStudyCommittee,saidthatthecommitteehas
beenmeetingwiththeCityforovertwoyearsregardingtheproposedpropertyandtrail
alternatives,andparticipantshaveincludedadjacenthomeowners,theHistoricalSociety,
andmultipleenvironmentalentities.Henotedthatthecommittee,withsupportfrom
interestedschooldistricteducators,createdaLegacyFarmconceptwhichwouldenable
communitypartnershipsforbuildingandsustainingalivingopenspacewithemphasison
K-12education.Henotedthatthecommitteelooksforwardtocompletingthe
architecturalreview process beforefinaltraillocationsaremade.
AnnNg,StevensCreekTrailBoardmember,saidthatthegroupisneutralonthetrail
alignmentandthankedCouncilfor buildingthetrail.
LeslieFowlersaidthatherkidslovetowalktoschool,andwiththetrailalignment
hopefullymoreparentswillallowtheirkidstowalktoschoolaswell.SheaskedCouncil
thatwhenfuture projectsare planned, neighborhoodsare not dissected bymajorroads.
RobertGeorge,PresidentoftheMeadowsofCupertinoHomeowner’sAssociation,said
thegroupsupportstheCity’seffortstoimprovetheStevensCreekTrailhabitat,andthe
trailthroughtheorchardshouldofferapleasantexperienceforthehikerswhileretaining
apeacefulandsecureenvironmentforadjacenthomeowners.HeurgedCouncilto
continuetheagreementtomaintaina100-footbetweenthetrailandtheresidentproperty
lines.
JohnBuenzsaidhewasamemberoftheoriginalStevensCreekTaskForceandurged
Counciltokeepthe100-footsetbackfromthepropertyownerlineandthetrail.Henoted
hewasopposedtoAlternative#1;Alternative#2wouldbeacceptable;hehadnoopinion
aboutAlternative#3;andhedefinitelyapprovedoftheBaselineAlternativewhichwas
closertowhatthe original TaskForce hadinmind.
15
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 5
DarrylStow,PresidentoftheCupertinoHistoricalSociety,suggestedthatinsteadof
havingthetrailgothroughtheorchard,tohaveitgothroughthewestsideofthecreek
instead.Hesaidthiswasthemostbeautifulpartoftrailandtheleastimpacttoneighbors,
thegolfcourse,andthe orcharditself.
CouncilaskedquestionsofstaffandthepreviouspublicspeakersanddiscussedtheBase
TrailalignmentandtheAlternative Trailalignments.
Santoromovedto(1)Putthebridgedownstreamofthepumphouse;(2)Placethetrail
betweentheredlines(asnotedonthestaffPowerPoint)andthesecondrowoftrees;and
(3)DirectstafftolookatthetrailcomingoutonStevensCreek.Mahoneysecondedfor
discussionandaddedafriendlyamendmenttomakethemovementofthebridgethefirst
priority,andlookatbothplacementalternativesinregardstothegolfcourse.Santoro
acceptedthefriendlyamendment.Staffwillcomebackwithcostanddesignanalysison
April 5. ThemotioncarriedwithChang voting no.
MayorWongreorderedtheagendatotake up OralCommunications next.
ORALCOMMUNICATIONS
LeslieFowlersaidshecouldn’tattendtheLehigh vestedrightsmeeting butwatchedit on TVand
wasupsetthatpeopleonlyhadtwominutestospeak.Shenotedthatpeoplehadplannedtheir
three-minutepresentationsandshethoughtitwasrudetoallowthemonlytwominutes.Shesaid
thatresidentshavearighttospeakforthreeminutesregardlessofwhomthemayorisorthe
circumstances.
MichaelaMillersaidsheworksforSiliconValleyFacesandnotedthattheyarehostinga
CommunityVoices:Dinner&DialogueonApril5from7-9PMattheLevyFamilyCampusin
LosGatos.Sheexplainedthattheeventisto bringtogetherAsianAmericanimmigrantsand non-
immigrantsintheregiontoencouragecommunityinvolvementand support ofeach other.
Councilrecessedfrom 8:45 p.m.to 8:50 p.m.
RichardAdlerfromNoToxicAirbeganaPowerPointpresentationwhichwasoriginallymade
bytheOfficeofMineandReclamationStateofficeonFebruary11totheStateMiningBoardin
Sacramento.HenotedthattheLehighHansenQuarryhasbeenoutofregulatorycompliancefor
10years.Thepresentationhighlightedabriefhistoryincluding:theReclamationPlanapproved
in1985;landslideissuesatthequarryin1987-2001;anEmergencyRepairProposalin2002;
Office of MiningReclamationinspection ofthe plantin 2005;anda public hearingin 2006.
PaulaWallacecontinuedthePowerPointpresentationbeganbyMr.Adlerhighlighting:the
NoticeofViolation/OrdertoComplyin2006tobeachievedattheendof2007;Amended
ReclamationPlanapplicationinJanuaryof2007whichwasrejectedbytheStateasinsufficient
requiringaComprehensiveGeotechnicalReport;aRevised45-DayNoticeforcompliance;a24-
monthextensiongrantedtothequarryforcomingintocompliance;illegaldumpingbythequarry
16
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 6
in2008atasitewhichisnowcalledtheEastMaterialsStorageArea(EMSA)throwingthe
compliancetimeline offto nowinclude EMSA;andaComprehensiveAmendmentin 2010.
RodSinkscontinuedthePowerPointpresentationwithwhatishappeningcurrentlywiththe
complianceissue.HenotedthatthequarryhasnoapprovedReclamationPlananddoesnot
qualifytobeontheState’sAB3098listwhicharequarriesingood standingallowingthemto bid
onpublicallyfundedprojects.HesaidthatLehighhasbeensupplyingcementandaggregates
togovernmentcontractsforalmost10yearsinviolationofStatelaw.HeaskedCounciltosenda
lettertotheStateOfficeofMiningReclamationdemandingLehighbetakenofftheAB3098list
andthattheStateMiningBoardtakeLeadAgencystatusawayfromtheCountyofSantaClara.
Moreinformationisatwww.cupertino.organdatwww.notoxicair.org.
TheCityCouncilcontinuedwiththeNewBusiness portion oftheagenda.
14.Subject:MunicipalCodeamendmentsregardingreconsiderationofitemsbyCity
Council
RecommendedAction:Conductfirstreading ofOrdinanceNo. 11-2075
Description:"AnOrdinanceoftheCityCounciloftheCityofCupertinoamending
Chapter2.08.096oftheCupertinoMunicipalCoderegardingReconsideration-Soughtby
InterestedPerson"
Writtencommunicationsincluded:
·Arevisedcopy ofthe draft ordinance
·AtypedlistofcommentsfromDarrylLumopposingtheproposedchangein
procedure
·AnemailfromKeith Murphy opposedtoalteringthereconsideration process
AssistanttotheCityAttorneyTeresaZuegerreviewedthestaffreportandCouncilasked
questionsfrom staff.
KeithMurphysaidheisatwo-timeloserofthereconsiderationprocessbutisgladhe
participatedbecausehefoundithelpful,educational,andagreatdialogue.Heurged
Counciltoconsiderwhatwould happeniftwoCouncilmembersconflicted on atopicand
onewereappointedtothesub-committee.ThatCouncilmembercouldtakethewhole
processhostageandessentiallyallowareconsiderationtopassorfail.Hesaidthatthe
reconsiderationprocessisabenefittothecommunityandwouldhatetoseeitgobackto
a potentialadversarial position.
JenniferGriffinsaidthatshehaswatchedthereconsiderationprocessevolveand
recommendedtoleavetheprocessalone.ShenotedthatCupertinoisn’tbigenoughto
havesub-committeesandthepublicneedstobeabletoparticipateandhavethingsoutin
the openand not behindclosed doors.
DarrellLumsaidthattheproposaliscomplexandnotveryworkable.Hesuggestedthat
thesub-committeeshouldonlybeanadvisorytothepetitionerandthatthepetitioner
17
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 7
shouldhavetheoptiontocontinuethereconsiderationprocesstothefullCityCouncil.
Healso notedthatthe sub-committee shouldn’t becomposed oftheCouncilmembers.
TomHuguninsaidthatthereisatransparentprocesstodayandtheCouncilfrom1999
thatapprovedthereconsiderationprocessneverenvisionedachangetothepartofthe
MunicipalCodebyaddingaSectionC.Henotedthatmanycitizensareengagedinthe
processandaddingSectionCwouldbecumbersome,andcitizensmaybeconfusedby
the process.
NedBrittsaidthathe’suncomfortablewithusingtwopeopleasagatekeepertodecideif
thereconsiderationshouldcomeforward.Hesuggestedusinganon-bindingprocessand
thepetitionershouldbeabletochooseoneofthesub-committeemembers.Healsonoted
thatthe petitioner should only haveto pay halfthemoney beforethecommitteemeetsand
thenchoosetostopthereorpaytherest,taketherisk,andhavetherestoftheCouncil
hearthe petition.
RobertMcKibbinsaidtherewasandstillisavalidreasonwhythereconsideration
processisinplaceandithasservedtheCitywellsince1999.Hesaidthatoneofhis
concernsisthatthemainargumentstaffhasitthatit’stimeconsuming.TheDemocratic,
openprocessishistoricallytimeconsuming.Heaskedquestionssuchaswouldthesub-
committeeprocessbetelevised,woulditbeopentothepublic,andhowwouldtwo
membersbeselected.Hewasconcernedaboutmakingdecisionsbehindcloseddoors.He
urgedCounciltoconsiderthereconsiderationcriteriaandnotedthattheyarenotblack
andwhiteand said hewantedto keepthe processthewayitis.
Councilasked questions of staffandfurther discussedtheissue.
Councilconcurredtodirectstafftoresearchwhetheritspermissibletoplaceacaponthe
totaltimelimitforreconsiderationitemsandcantheprocessbeseparatedintotwosteps:
1.Haveanyofthefivecriteriabeenmet;2.Ifno,thepetitionwillnotbeconsidered
furtherandifyes,afull hearingwillcommence.
ORDINANCES
15.Subject:SecondreadingandadoptionofMunicipalCodeamendmentstotheParking
Ordinance
RecommendedAction:Conduct secondreadingandenactOrdinanceNo. 11-2074
Description:MunicipalCodeAmendment(MCA-2010-05)toChapter19.100and
Chapter19.08toclarifylanguageregardingstorageandparkingofheavyequipmentand
plannednon-operationalvehiclesinresidentialzones.“AnOrdinanceoftheCityCouncil
oftheCity ofCupertinoamendingChapter 19.100 (ParkingRegulations) oftheCupertino
MunicipalCodewithassociatedamendmentstoChapter19.08(DefinitionsOrdinance)
relatedtoclarifyinglanguageregardingstorageandparkingofheavyequipmentand
planned non-operational vehiclesinresidentialzones”
18
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 8
TheDeputyCityClerkreadthetitleoftheordinance.MahoneymovedandWang
secondedtoreadtheordinancebytitleonly,andthattheDeputyCityClerk’sreading
wouldconstitutethesecondreadingthereof.Ayes:Chang,Mahoney,Santoro,Wangand
Wong.Noes:None.Absent:None.
MahoneymovedandWangsecondedtoenactOrdinanceNo.11-2074.Ayes:Chang,
Mahoney,Santoro,WangandWong.Noes:None.Absent:None.
STAFFREPORTS – None
COUNCILREPORTS
CouncildirectedstafftoresearchthepossibilityofjoiningaCouncilmeetingremotelyifa
Councilmembercould notattendthemeetingin person.
CouncilMembershighlightedtheactivitiesoftheircommitteesanddiscussedvarious
communityevents.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:52 p.m.,themeetingwasadjourned.
REDEVELOPMENTAGENCYMEETING
At10:53p.m.ChairGilbertWongcalledtheregularRedevelopmentAgencymeetingtoorderin
theCouncilChamber,10350TorreAvenue,Cupertino,California,andledthePledgeof
Allegiance.
ROLLCALL
RedevelopmentAgencymembersPresent:ChairGilbertWong,Vice-ChairMarkSantoro,and
RedevelopmentAgencymembersBarryChang,Orrin Mahoney,andKrisWang.Absent: none.
A.Subject:February 15 RedevelopmentAgency Minutes
RecommendedAction:Approveminutes
WangmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovetheminutes.Themotioncarried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:55 p.m.,themeetingwasadjourned.
____________________________
GraceSchmidt,DeputyCityClerk
19
March 15, 2011CupertinoCityCouncilPage 9
Staffreports,backupmaterials,anditemsdistributedattheCityCouncilmeetingareavailable
forreviewattheCityClerk’sOffice,777-3223,andalsoontheInternetatwww.cupertino.org.
Click on Agendas& Minutes,thenclick on theappropriatePacket.
MostCouncilmeetingsareshownliveonComcastChannel26andAT&TU-verseChannel99
andareavailableatyourconvenienceatwww.cupertino.org.ClickonAgendas&Minutes,then
clickArchivedWebcast.VideotapesareavailableattheCupertinoLibrary,ormaybepurchased
fromtheCupertinoCityChannel, 777-2364.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3354www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
CityProject,PavementRestoration,ProjectNo.2009-08.
RecommendedAction
AcceptProjectNo. 2009-08.
Discussion
TheCity’scontractor,G.Bortolotto&Company,hascompletedworkonthePavement
RestorationProjectwhichconsisted ofasphaltrepairsat variouslocationsthroughouttheCity.
_____________________________________
Preparedby:JoanneJohnson,PublicWorks Engineering Technician
Reviewedby: TimmBorden,PublicWorksDirector
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachments:A – PavementRestorationLocationList
54
ATTACHMENTA
PavementRestorationProject–2009-08Location List
CordovaRd
EEstatesDr
Farallone Dr
Flora VistaAve
Folkestone Dr
GardenGate Dr
Gardena Dr
GardensideDr
JaniceAve
LazaneoDr
LoreeAve
McClellanRd
PacificaDr
PalmAve
Palo Vista
PharLapDr
Presidio Dr
SanFernandoAve
StevensCreekBlvd
WillowbrookWay
55
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
AUTHORIZINGEXECUTIONOFANDEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTBETWEENTHE
CITYANDDEVELOPER,MIMI TSUI, 10292ORANGEAVENUE,APN 357-19-030
WHEREAS,therehasbeenpresentedtotheCityCouncilaproposeddevelopment
agreementbetweentheCityofCupertinoanddeveloper,MimiTsui,fortheinstallationof
certainmunicipalimprovementsat10292OrangeAvenue,andsaidagreementhavingbeen
approvedbytheCityAttorney,andDeveloperhavingpaidthefeesasoutlinedintheattached
ExhibitA;
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDTHATtheMayorandtheCityClerkare
herebyauthorizedto signtheaforementionedagreement on behalfoftheCity ofCupertino.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
Cupertinothis 5th day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
56
ResolutionNo. 11-
Page2
EXHIBIT“A”
SCHEDULEOFBOND,FEES,ANDDEPOSITS
DEVELOPERS:MIMITSUI
LOCATION:10292ORANGEAVENUE,APN 357-19-030
PARTAFaithfulPerformanceBond:$ 15,000.00
110 2211
PARTBLaborand MaterialBond:$ 15,000.00
110 2211
PARTC.CheckingandInspectionFee:$ 2,468.00
110 4538
PARTD.Development MaintenanceDeposit:$ 1,000.00
110 2211
PART E.StormDrainageFee –Basin 3$ 185.98
215 4072
PARTF.StreetLight-One-YearPowerCost:N/A
110 4537
PARTG.MapCheckingFee:N/A
110 4539
PARTH.ParkFee-ZONEIIN/A
280 4082
PARTI.ReimbursementFee:N/A
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING EXECUTIONOFANDEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTBETWEEN THE
CITYANDDEVELOPERS,JERRYJIN-TZONGLIUANDJENNIFERFANGFANG,
21835LOMITAAVENUE,APN 357-16-063
WHEREAS,therehasbeenpresentedtotheCityCouncilaproposeddevelopment
agreementbetweentheCityofCupertinoanddevelopers,JerryJin-TzongLiuandJenniferFang
Fang,fortheinstallationofcertainmunicipalimprovementsat21835LomitaAvenue,andsaid
agreementhavingbeenapprovedbytheCityAttorney,andDevelopershavingpaidthefeesas
outlinedintheattachedExhibitA;
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDTHATtheMayorandtheCityClerkare
herebyauthorizedto signtheaforementionedagreement on behalfoftheCity ofCupertino.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
Cupertinothis 5th day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
73
ResolutionNo. 11-
Page2
EXHIBIT“A”
SCHEDULEOFBOND,FEES,ANDDEPOSITS
DEVELOPERS:JERRYJIN-TZONGLIUANDJENNIFERFANGFANG
LOCATION:21835LOMITAAVENUE,APN 357-16-063
PARTAFaithfulPerformanceBond:$ 4,277.00
110 2211
PARTBLaborand MaterialBond:$ 4,277.00
110 2211
PARTC.CheckingandInspectionFee:$ 2,468.00
110 4538
PARTD.Development MaintenanceDeposit:$ 1,000.00
110 2211
PART E.StormDrainageFee –Basin 2$ 229.98
215 4072
PARTF.StreetLight-One-YearPowerCost:N/A
110 4537
PARTG.MapCheckingFee:N/A
110 4539
PARTH.ParkFee-ZONEIIN/A
280 4082
PARTI.ReimbursementFee:N/A
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGQUITCLAIMDEEDANDAUTHORIZATIONFORUNDERGROUND
WATERRIGHTS,MIMI TSUI,10292ORANGEAVENUE.,APN 357-19-030
WHEREAS,MimiTsui,hasexecuteda“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”,whichisin
goodand sufficientform, quitclaimingallrightsinandauthorizingtheCityofCupertino,County
ofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,toextractwaterfromtheundergroundbasin,underlyingthat
certainreal property situateintheCity ofCupertino,more particularlydescribedasfollows:
AllthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,CountyofSanta
Clara,State ofCalifornia,as shownintheattached Exhibit“A”.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityofCupertinoacceptsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization” so tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”andthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
Cupertinothis 5th day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
90
91
92
93
94
95
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGQUITCLAIMDEEDANDAUTHORIZATIONFORUNDERGROUND
WATERRIGHTS,HANTYNGKENNETHHSIEHANDJEANLAI,
20557BLOSSOMLANE,APN 359-18-033
WHEREAS,HantyngKennethHsiehand JeanLai,haveexecuteda“QuitclaimDeedand
Authorization”,whichisingoodandsufficientform,quitclaimingallrightsinandauthorizing
theCityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,toextractwaterfromthe
undergroundbasin,underlyingthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,more
particularly describedasfollows:
AllthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,CountyofSanta
Clara,State ofCalifornia,as shownintheattached Exhibit“A”.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityofCupertinoacceptsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization” so tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”andthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
Cupertinothis 5th day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
96
97
98
99
100
101
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGQUITCLAIMDEEDANDAUTHORIZATIONFORUNDERGROUND
WATERRIGHTS,PAULA.LASSAANDPALMYRAS.PAWLIK,
21700ALCAZARAVE.,APN 357-19-109
WHEREAS,PaulA.LassaandPalmyraS.Pawlik,haveexecuteda“QuitclaimDeedand
Authorization”,whichisingoodandsufficientform,quitclaimingallrightsinandauthorizing
theCityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,toextractwaterfromthe
undergroundbasin,underlyingthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,more
particularly describedasfollows:
AllthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,CountyofSanta
Clara,State ofCalifornia,as shownintheattached Exhibit“A”.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityofCupertinoacceptsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization” so tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”andthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
Cupertinothis 5th day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
102
103
104
105
106
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGQUITCLAIMDEEDANDAUTHORIZATIONFORUNDERGROUND
WATERRIGHTS,JERRYJIN-TZONGLIUANDJENNIFERFANGFANG,
21835LOMITAAVE.,APN 357-16-063
WHEREAS,JerryJin-TzongLiuandJenniferFangFang,haveexecuteda“Quitclaim
DeedandAuthorization”,whichisingoodandsufficientform,quitclaimingallrightsinand
authorizingtheCityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,toextractwater
fromthe underground basin, underlyingthatcertainreal property situateintheCity ofCupertino,
more particularlydescribedasfollows:
AllthatcertainrealpropertysituateintheCityofCupertino,CountyofSanta
Clara,State ofCalifornia,as shownintheattached Exhibit“A”.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityofCupertinoacceptsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization” so tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
“QuitclaimDeedandAuthorization”andthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
Cupertinothis 5th day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
107
108
109
110
111
112
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGGRANTOF EASEMENTFORROADWAYPURPOSES,
FROMMIMI TSUI, 10292ORANGEAVENUE,APN 357-19-030
WHEREAS,MimiTsui.,hasexecutedaGrantofEasementforroadwaypurposes,which
isingoodandsufficientform,grantingtheCityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,Stateof
California,easementovercertainpropertyforroadwaypurposessituateat10292Orange
Avenue,moreparticularlydescribedinExhibit“A”andExhibit“B”,attachedheretoandmadea
part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCity ofCupertinoaccept said grant so
tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
grantandthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
th
Cupertinothis 5 day ofApril, 2011 bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
113
114
115
116
117
118
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGGRANTOF EASEMENTFORSTREETLIGHTPURPOSES,
FROMVINCENTC.WONGSENIORANDVINCENTC.WONGJUNIOR,
18996PENDERGASTAVENUE,APN 357-34-039
WHEREAS,VincentC.WongSeniorandVincentC.WongJunior.,haveexecuteda
GrantofEasementforstreetlightpurposes,whichisingoodandsufficientform,grantingthe
CityofCupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,easementovercertainpropertyfor
streetlightpurposessituateat18996PendergastAvenue,moreparticularlydescribedinExhibit
“A”& Exhibit“B”,attached heretoandmadea part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCity ofCupertinoaccept said grant so
tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
grantandthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
th
Cupertinothis 5 day ofApril, 2011 bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
119
120
121
122
123
124
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
ACCEPTINGGRANTOF EASEMENTFORROADWAYPURPOSES,
JERRYJIN-TZONGLIUANDJENNIFERFANGFANG,
21835LOMITAAVENUE,APN 357-16-063
WHEREAS,JerryJin-TzongLiuandJenniferFangFang.,haveexecutedaGrantof
Easementforroadwaypurposes,whichisingoodandsufficientform,grantingtheCityof
Cupertino,CountyofSantaClara,StateofCalifornia,easementovercertainpropertyfor
roadwaypurposessituateat21835LomitaAvenue,moreparticularlydescribedinExhibit“A”,
attachedheretoandmadea part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCity ofCupertinoaccept said grant so
tendered;and
ITISFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedtorecordsaid
grantandthisresolution.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof
th
Cupertinothis 5 day ofApril, 2011 bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
125
126
127
128
129
130
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3308www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
AlcoholicBeverageLicense,BonjourSandwiches&Crepes, 20371 StevensCreekBoulevard
(near Torre)
RecommendedAction
ApproveapplicationforOn-SaleBeer&WineforBonaFidePublic EatingPlace.
Description
Name ofBusiness:BonjourSandwiches&Crepes
Location:20371StevensCreekBoulevard
TypeofBusiness:Restaurant
TypeofLicense:On-SaleBeer&WineforBonaFidePublic EatingPlace(41)
ReasonforApplication:Original&AnnualFees,State&FederalFingerprints
Discussion
Thereare no use permitrestrictions orzoningrestrictionswhichwould prohibitthis useand staff
has no objectiontotheissuance ofthelicense.LicenseType 41 authorizesthe sale of beerand
wineforconsumption onthe premiseswhere sold.
_____________________________________
Preparedby:TraciCaton,PlanningDepartment
Reviewedby:GaryChao,CityPlanner;AartiShrivastava,Director ofCommunityDevelopment
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachment:ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicense
131
132
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3308www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CDBG)funds,HumanServicegrants,andFY2011Annual
ActionPlan
RecommendedAction
ConductpublichearingandcontinuefinalapprovalofthefundingallocationsandFY2011Annual
ActionPlanto May 3 tocompletethe 30-dayreview period.
Description
Thisisthefirstoftworequiredpublichearingsregardinguseof2011-12CDBGfunds,HumanService
grants,andtheFY 2011 AnnualActionPlan.
Discussion
CDBGProgram
TheCityofCupertinoisexpectingtoreceiveaCDBGentitlementofapproximately$422,719forfiscal
year2011-12,plusareallocationof$10,300inprojectedprogramincomefromrehabilitationloanpayoffs
foratotalof$433,019.Sincethefederalbudgethasnotbeenapproved,thisentitlementmaybereduced
priortotheJulyallocationsinwhichcasetheCity’sAffordableHousingFund(fundedbyBMRfees)will
beusedtomaketheconstructionprojectswhole.Adetaileddiscussionisprovidedlaterinthisreport.
However,thepublicserviceagenciescouldseeareductioninfundingbecauseofthe15%caponpublic
serviceagencyfunding pertheDepartment ofHousingandUrbanDevelopment(HUD)regulations.
ThisisCupertino’sninthyearasanentitlementjurisdictionreceivingtheCDBGgrantdirectlyfromHUD
andthesecondyearofatwo-yearpublicservicefundingcycle.HUDregulationsrequirethatprojects
selectedforfundingbenefitverylowandlow-incomehouseholds,eliminateablightedarea,oraddressan
urgent(emergency)communityneed.Inaddition, onlycertaintypes ofactivities qualify undertheCDBG
regulations. Examples ofeligibleactivitiesare:
·Removal of barrierstothe handicapped·Propertyacquisitionforaffordable
housing
·Publicimprovements
·Rehabilitation ofaffordable units
·Public serviceactivities
·Affordable housing developments
Ofthe$433,019(entitlementplusprogramincome),only20%,or$86,604,maybeusedfor
administrationoftheprogramandfairhousingservicesand15%,or$64,952,maybeusedtofund
publicserviceactivities.Publicserviceactivitiesmustbenefitverylowandlow-incomehouseholds
andincludeactivities suchaschildcare, placement services, seniorlegal services,etc.
Theremainderofthegrant($281,463)canonlybeusedforactivitiessuchasthepurchaseoflandfor
affordablehousing,rehabilitationofqualifyingunits,constructionofaffordableunitsandpublic
133
April5,2011Page2of4
CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CDBG)funds,Human Servicegrants,and FY2011AnnualActionPlan
improvementsinlowandvery-lowincomeneighborhoods.AttachmentBprovidesasummaryofthe
fundingallocations.
Asmentionedearlier,thisisthe secondyear ofthetwo-year public servicefundingcycle.InFebruary
2008,theCityCouncilvotedtomovetoatwo-yearfundingcycletoreducethelengthofpublic
hearingsandreducetheamountoftimenon-profitagenciesspendpreparingapplicationsforfunding.
AlthoughtheCityCouncilmaderecommendationsforfundingpublicserviceagenciesandhuman
servicegrantfundinglastyear,annualpublichearingsarerequiredbyHUDtoreviewtheAnnual
Planandfinalizetheallocations.Publicserviceandhumanserviceagencieswerenotrequiredto
completeafundingapplicationormakepresentationsathearingsthisyear.Also,insteadofstaff
preparinganewagreementfornextyear’sfunding,aone-pageamendmenttolastyear’sagreement
willbepresentedtoeachagencywiththeamendeddatesanddollaramounts.Thisprocesssaves
significant stafftimefor boththeCityandeach non-profitagency.
RequestforProposals:
ThisisCupertino’ssecondyearutilizinganon-lineRequestforProposal(RFP)andapplication
process.Staffplacedapublicnoticeinthelocalpapernotifyingpotentialapplicantsofthefunding
availabilityanddirectingtheagenciestotheCitywebsitewheretheyreceivedinstructionsonhowto
accessthewww.citydataservices.comwebsite.
CupertinoHousingCommission:
OnMay18,2010,theCityCouncilapprovedarevisedCitizenParticipationPlanaspartofits2010-
2015ConsolidatedPlan.PriortoexpendingCDBGdollars,theCityisrequiredtohaveaCitizen
ParticipationPlan,ConsolidatedPlanandanAnnualPlaninplace.AspartoftherevisedCitizen
ParticipationPlan,theCitydeclaredthattheCupertinoHousingCommissionwouldserveasthe
advisorybodyonCDBGmatters.TheHousingCommission’sresponsibilityistomake
recommendationsonpolicy,evaluateproposalsreceivedandmakefundingrecommendationstothe
CityCouncil.
OnMarch10,2011,theHousingCommissionmetandconductedapublic hearing on theFY 2011-12
CDBGandHumanServicefundingallocations. TherecommendationsfromtheHousingCommission
arelisted below:
§CDBG Public ServiceGrants:
ThepublicserviceportionoftheCDBGentitlementislimitedto15%oftheentireentitlement
plusprojectedprogramincome.Asmentionedearlier,thisisthesecondyearofatwoyear
fundingcycle.Allpublicserviceandhumanservicegrantswillberenewedforthesameamount
asallocatedlastyear.Thisincludesageneralfundallocationof$40,300.Ifthefederalentitlement
should decrease,all public serviceagencygrantswillexperiencea prorata decreaseinfunding.
§CDBGConstruction/Acquisition/Rehabilitation:
Unlikethefundingforpublicserviceandadministrativeactivities,thepercentageoffundingused
forcapitalimprovements,construction,acquisitionandrehabilitationisnotlimitedtoaspecific
percentageofthetotalfunding.ItencompassesthelargestpercentageoftheCDBGentitlement.
Thisyear,staffreceivedtwofundingproposalsforthisfundingsource.TheCommissionheard
134
April5,2011Page3of4
CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CDBG)funds,Human Servicegrants,and FY2011AnnualActionPlan
presentationsfromtwoapplicantsandrecommendedthattheCityCouncilfullyfundboth
agencies.
RebuildingTogetherSiliconValleysubmittedarequestfor$60,000tocontinueitsprogramof
makingminorhomerepairsforlowandverylowincomeCupertinohomeowners.Theallocation
wouldallowtheagencyto serve 5-8eligibleCupertino households.
SeniorHousingSolutionsisrequesting$196,195forthefinalphaseofthePriceAvenue
congregateseniorhome.Allexteriorworkonthehomeandfiftypercentoftheinteriorworkhas
beencompleted.Theadditionalfundingwouldpayforcabinets,countertops,finishedwalls,
appliancesandflooringinthe home.
§General Fund AllocationforHuman ServiceGrants:
EveryyeartheCityCouncilallocatesapproximately$40,000fromtheGeneralFundtohuman
serviceagencies.Formalagreementsandmonitoringarerequiredforthisprogram,butthe
requirementsarelessstringentthanforfederalfunding.TheHousingCommissionreviewsthe
allocationsatthesametimeastheCDBGallocationsandmakesrecommendationstotheCity
Council.TheHumanServiceGrantallocationsareonatwo-yearfundingcyclesimilartothe
CDBGpublicservicegrantcycle.AswiththeCDBGpublicservicegrantstheagencieswill
receivethesameamountasapprovedlastfiscalyear.Iffundsdecreaseduringthesecondyear
citybudgetcycle,eachagencywouldbeaffectedproportionately.Theseagencieswillalso
receivea one-pageamendmenttolastyear’sagreement.
§AffordableHousing Fund:
Staffalsoproposesa$75,000allocationtoWestValleyCommunityServicesfromtheAffordable
HousingFundforadministrationandmonitoring oftheBelow MarketRate(BMR)Program units.
TheAffordableHousingFundreceivesitsrevenuefromthepaymentofhousingmitigationfees
from office,commercialandindustrial developments.
FY 2011-12AnnualActionPlan:
FederalregulationsrequirethateachentitlementjurisdictionprepareanAnnualActionPlanand
th
submittheplantotheregionalHUDofficenolaterthanMay15ofeachyear.TheAnnualAction
Planisaone-yearplanwhichdescribestheeligibleprograms,projectsandactivitiestobeundertaken
withfundsexpectedduringtheprogramyear(FiscalYear2011-2012)anditsrelationshiptothe
priorityhousing,homelessandcommunitydevelopmentneedsoutlinedintheapprovedConsolidated
Plan.Furthermore,Federalregulationsrequiretheplanbemadeavailablefor30daysforpublic
reviewandcomment.TheFY2011-2012AnnualActionPlan(AttachmentA)wasreleasedfor
publicreviewonMarch11,2011forthe30-dayreviewperiod.Anoticewasplacedinthelocal
paperinformingthepublicofitsavailability.OnMay3,2011,theCityCouncilwillholdafinal
public hearingtoapprovetheAnnualActionPlanfor submittaltoHUD.
Fiscal Impact
CDBG Funds
TheCity ofCupertinoisexpectingtoreceive $422,719 forfiscalyear 2011-12, plusareallocation of
$10,300in projected programincomefromrehabilitationloan payoffsforatotal of $433,019.Since
135
April5,2011Page4of4
CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CDBG)funds,Human Servicegrants,and FY2011AnnualActionPlan
Congress has notapprovedthe 2011 Federal budget,any decreaseintheCity’sentitlementwill be
reflectedina proportional decreasetoall public serviceagencies.SinceRebuilding TogetherSilicon
ValleyandSeniorHousingSolutionswill qualifyforAffordableHousingFunds, staff proposesto
make up any decreaseinCDBGfundingthroughthesefunds.
AffordableHousing Funds
TheAffordableHousingFundreceivesrevenuefromanyBMRfees paid by developers ofresidential,
office,commercial, or hotel. Thesefeesareaccumulatedand usedforthecreation of newaffordable
housing unitseitherthrough newconstruction or substantialrehabilitation.Currently,thefund has
approximately $600,000 availableforallocation.Ofthe $600,000, atotal of $75,000 has been set-
asideforWVCSadministration oftheBMR programforFY 2011-12leavinga balance of $525,000.
General Funds
TheFY2011-12allocationfor public serviceand human servicegrantsis proposedat $40,300. This
amountwasapproved bytheCouncilin 2010 as part ofthetwo-yearfundingcycle.
_____________________________________
Prepared by:VeraGil,SeniorPlanner
Reviewed by:AartiShrivastava,Director ofCommunityDevelopment
ApprovedforSubmission by:DavidW.Knapp,City Manager
Attachments:
AttachmentA:FiscalYear 2010-11AnnualActionPlan
AttachmentB:Summary ofFundingAllocations
AttachmentC: 2010-11CDBGFundingApplications
136
ATTACHMENTA
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fiscal Year 2011 Annual Action Plan
Prepared by the Department of Community Development
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Aarti Shrivastava, Director
Approved by City Council
May, 2011
Resolution 11-
For information regarding this document, please contact:
Vera Gil, Senior Planner
Phone: (408) 777-3251
E-mail:verag@cupertino.org
137
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Action Plan is an annual plan, which the City of Cupertino, as lead agency, oversees
pursuant to the goals outlined in the Consolidated Plan. The Action Plan details the activities
Cupertino will undertake to address the housing and community development needs and local
objectives using funds received during that program year from the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) plus anticipated Program Income. The Action Plan consists of HUD-
developed forms plus a supplemental narrative.
The largest portion of the CDBG resources continues to be used for housing and homeless
programs available on a citywide basis. Fair housing activities and administrative costs will not
exceed 20% of the annual allocation.
Evaluation of Past Performance
Over the course of fiscal year 2010/2011 the City of Cupertino anticipates providing financial
assistance to 4 affordable housing units through the use of CDBG funds. The funds will be used
to assist in the construction of four units by Habitat for Humanity of local CHDO. The portion
of CDBG funds that will be allocated to public service subrecipients will be used to provide
approximately 800 persons with food, clothing and housing counseling, 90 days of shelter to 80
homeless and adult day care to 11 households.
Cupertino was successful in addressing a majority of the goals and objectives cited in the fiscal
year 2010/11 Annual Action Plan. Most of the CDBG funds were used to carry out activities
that benefit low and moderate-income persons. Only CDBG administration funds and a portion
of ECHO’s fair housing funds did not directly serve low and moderate-income persons. Some of
the funded activities include fair housing, senior services, food and clothing and emergency
housing. These activities continue to make a positive impact on identified needs and are
providing services that might have gone unmet. As can be expected, community needs continue
to exceed the available resources.
INTRODUCTION
The Annual Action Plan is a one-year plan which describes the eligible programs, projects and
activities to be undertaken with funds expected during the program year (Fiscal Year 2010-2011)
and their relationship to the priority housing, homeless and community development needs
outlined in the Consolidated Plan.
FEDERAL RESOURCES
The City of Cupertino’s Annual Action Plan for the 2011-12 Program Year is a comprehensive
approach to addressing the immediate community needs of people who are very low and low
income. The Action Plan is based on a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
entitlement of $422,719 that the City anticipates will be received from the federal Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and $10,300 in program income. Exhibit A describes
the agencies proposed to receive funding in the 2011-12 fiscal year. Also detailed in the exhibit
are the goals and proposed funding amount for each of the agencies.
138
Anticipated CDBG program income during the 2011-12 Program Year is estimated to total
$10,300 derived from outstanding rehabilitation program loans. A portion of that program
income will be allocated to support Public Service activities and administration. The city of
Cupertino will allocate $64,950 to public service activities. Consistent with CDBG regulations,
this amount represents no more than 15% of the combined total of the City's projected 2011-12
Program Year income and the 2011-12 entitlement.
In 1999 HUD informed the Santa Clara County that the San Jose Metropolitan Statistical Area is
one of the high-income areas where the income limits were increased to the actual 80% of
median income, adjusted for household size. The City of Cupertino will continue to use the
actual 80% of median income limits for all of its CDBG programs in the 2010 Program Year.
Individual activities may use a lower income eligibility criterion.
OTHER RESOURCES
Housing Mitigation Program
The Office and Industrial Mitigation Program acknowledges housing needs created by the
development of office and industrial projects. A fee is applied to new square footage of office
and industrial development in the City. The fees collected are deposited in the City's Affordable
Housing Fund and are to be used for the provision of affordable housing.
The City's Residential Mitigation Program applies to all new residential development of one unit
or greater. Residential developers are required to designate at least 15% of the units in an
ownership development as affordable and are required to pay a mitigation fee for rental
developments. These designated units are identified as the "BMR" (Below Market Rate) units.
For ownership developments of six or fewer units or in the case of all rental developments, the
developer may pay a fee in-lieu of building the affordable units. All affordable units developed
under the BMR program must remain affordable for 99 years from the date of first occupancy
and, if for sale units are resold during that period, a new 99 year time period is established.
The City administers the Affordable Housing Fund, which is currently supported with fees paid
through the Housing Mitigation Program. Potential options for use of the housing funds include:
a. Development of new affordable units.
b. Conversion of existing market rate units to affordable units.
c. Down payment assistance programs.
d. Second mortgage programs.
West Valley Community Services– West Valley Community Services (WVCS) is a non-profit
organization that assists in administering housing programs on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
WVCS administers the Rotating Shelter Program for homeless individuals and also manages a
transitional housing facility. Further, WVCS acts as the administrative agent on behalf of the
City in managing and monitoring the BMR program.
Housing Trust of Santa Clara County (HTSCC) – The HTSCC is a public/private venture,
dedicated to increasing affordable housing in the Silicon Valley. The Trust makes available
funds for developers to borrow for the construction of the affordable units. Cupertino originally
contributed $250,000 to the fund and accessed the fund to assist in the development of Vista
139
Village, a 24-unit affordable apartment complex constructed by BRIDGE Housing and Cupertino
Community Services. Subsequently, the City contributed $25,000 in 2008 and 2009.
"Move In For Less" Program - In cooperation with the Tri-County Apartment Association, this
program recognizes the high cost of securing rental housing. The program is geared to classroom
teachers in public or private schools who meet income criteria. Apartment owners/managers who
agree to participate in the program require no more than 20% of the monthly rent as a security
deposit from qualified teachers. This reduced security deposit hopefully makes it more
financially feasible for a teacher to move into rental housing.
Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program -The MCC program provides assistance to first-
time homebuyers by allowing an eligible purchaser to take 20% of their annual mortgage interest
payment as a tax credit against federal income taxes. Santa Clara County administers the MCC
Program on behalf of the jurisdictions in the County, including Cupertino. The program does
establish maximum sales price limits on units assisted in this program and, due to the high
housing costs in Cupertino, there have been few households assisted in Cupertino in recent years.
Second Unit Program -- The City's Second Unit Ordinance allows an additional unit to be built
on any single-family residential parcel. The objective of this Ordinance is to encourage
additional units on already developed parcels, such as parcels with single-family dwellings.
Santa Clara County Affordable Housing Fund (AHF)
In July 2002, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors created an Office of Affordable
Housing and established a housing trust fund in the amount of $18.6 million to be used for
affordable housing developments. The primary goal of the fund is to leverage funding with other
sources and create affordable housing in Santa Clara County.
Section 8
The Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara (HACSC) provides rental subsidies and
develops affordable housing for low-income families, seniors and persons with disabilities living
in Santa Clara County, California, the heart of Silicon Valley. This past year, the Housing
Authority provided voucher assistance to 74 Cupertino households.
Density Bonus Ordinance -- The City's Density Bonus Ordinance allows a 25% increase in
density for developments greater than 5 units that provide a proportion of units for very low or
low-income households or housing for senior citizens. In addition to the density bonus, certain
concessions can also be provided to the development, which can include:
a.Reduction of Parking Requirements,
b.Reduction of Open Space Requirements,
c.Reduction of Setback Requirements,
d.Approval of Mixed Use Zoning,
e.Reduction of Park Dedication Fees,
f.Reduction of application or construction permit fees, or
g.Provision of tax-exempt or other financial assistance.
140
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
The Housing Services Division of the Community Development Department is the lead agency
for overseeing the development of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan.
This Annual Action Plan development process began with an advertised public hearing, held by
the Cupertino Housing Commission on March 10, 2011 to make funding recommendations to the
City Council. In addition, to the public notice, written notification of the hearing was made to
numerous non-profit service agencies and the city’s CDBG Steering Committee for the purpose
of gaining greater input for determining the best use of anticipated federal funds for addressing
community needs.
The City Council held two advertised public hearing on April 5, 2011 and May 5, 2011, to
determine the allocation of CDBG funds for the 2011 Program Year. The Annual Plan 30 day
public review period occurred March 11, 2011 through April 11, 2011. The City did not receive
any public comments.
CONSULTATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
As standard practice, CDBG entitlement jurisdictions from throughout Santa Clara County meet
at least quarterly to discuss issues of common interest. Meeting agendas cover such topics as
projects receiving multi-jurisdictional funding, performance levels and costs for contracted
public services, proposed annual funding plans, HUD program administration requirements, and
other topics of mutual concern. These quarterly meetings provided the opportunity for the City to
consult with other jurisdictions on its proposed use of federal funds for the 2011 Program Year.
CONSOLIDATED PLAN (CON PLAN) PRIORITIES
The City of Cupertino adopted a new Consolidated Plan on May 18, 2010 with the priorities
listed in Table 2A and 2B. These tables are attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit B
of this document.
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
A map outlining geographic areas considered to be of low and moderate-income concentration is
included as part to this submittal. In the map, three Census tracts indicate a higher percentage of
low/mod population than all other Cupertino Census tracts. It is from these three Census tracts
that the City of Cupertino recruits three representatives of the CDBG Steering Committee.
Funding support for the listed projects is based more on expressed need within the community
rather than upon geographical priority.
ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY
In a continuing effort to reduce poverty, the city of Cupertino will make it a priority to fund
agencies that provide direct assistance to the homeless and those in danger of becoming
homeless and make a commitment to improve the communication and service delivery
capabilities of agencies and organizations that provide programs to assist the homeless.
Depending on funding availability, Cupertino will continue to provide assistance to public
agencies and nonprofit organizations providing neighborhood housing services, supportive
141
services to the homeless, older adults with physical or mental impairment, the mentally ill,
victims of domestic violence, and households with abused children among others.
Coordinate with public agencies providing job training, life skills training, lead poisoning
prevention and remediation and other education programs that listed in the City’s Consolidated
Plan strategies.
HOMELESS AND SPECIAL NEEDS
In previous years, the City of Cupertino appropriated $20,000 in CDBG funds for the Sobrato
Family Living Center Project and contributed to the Home Safe-Santa Clara providing
transitional housing for survivors of domestic violence who are considered at-risk for
homelessness. Most recently, in a 2008 mid-year reallocation, the City contributed $800,000 to
Maitri, a non-profit agency providing transitional housing to victims of domestic violence, for
the purchase of a four-plex in Cupertino.
In addition to these capital project subsidies, the City will fund public service activities related to
homelessness. During the 2011 program year, the city will provide $19,014 to the Haven to
Home Program to provide support services to Cupertino. The City of Cupertino will also
continue to coordinate services to the homeless through such inter-agency efforts as the
Collaborative, Help House the Homeless, and the Community Technology Alliance and support
the regional Continuum of Care.
Cupertino also participated in the countywide homeless count that took place in early 2009
which reported 18 unsheltered homeless. This is an update of the surveys that took place in
2005, and 2007.
In addressing senior services, the City will continue advocacy for the increased dissemination of
accurate information and counseling for seniors and other persons regarding housing options
available. This will be accomplished through a cooperative effort with the Cupertino Senior
Center, Cupertino Community Services and the Cupertino Public Library.
LEAD-BASED PAINT
Lead-based paint awareness and abatement will be fully integrated by the City of Cupertino into
its assisted housing programs. Each tenant, landlord and property owner will be informed of the
dangers, symptoms, testing, treatment and prevention of lead-based paint poisoning. Lead-based
paint hazard stabilization or abatement will be provided in each and every rehabilitation project.
Furthermore, adherence to Federal guidelines for reduction activities with lead-based paint is
provided for in every federally funded rehabilitation loan.
PUBLIC HOUSING
The City will continue to encourage the local Public Housing Authority to develop affordable
units in the city of Cupertino.
LEVERAGING OF FUNDS
To the greatest extent possible, when feasible, the City of Cupertino will leverage public and
private resources to achieve the goals of the Consolidated Plan. Cupertino will continue to
142
request that affordable housing developers to seek private financing and grants and to fully
utilize other state and federal funding sources, such as the State of California Multifamily
Housing and the Low Income Housing Tax Credit programs.
FAIR HOUSING
Cupertino continues to support both the purpose and goal of fair housing and works to achieve
fair housing in administering federal, State and local programs. The City also supports the
development of affordable housing stock that is an important part of a fair housing initiative,
given the high cost of local housing.
In conjunction with other jurisdictions in Santa Clara County, the City commissioned a
comprehensive survey to identify unmet needs and unidentified barriers, to assess the delivery of
fair housing services, and to recommend action steps to meet the County's fair housing needs.
The study was completed in 2003 and the city will be working with the other Santa Clara County
to review program changes as a result of the study. The City prepared an Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) in 2004.
The proposed actions to be undertaken by the City in the 2010 Program Year consist of the
following:
The City will continue to require developers to provide relocation assistance when
residents will be displaced.
The City will continue to provide a housing program that allows for modification of
existing housing facilitating the needs of persons with disabilities.
The City will continue to support non-profit organizations whose purpose is to aid in the
furthering of fair housing in the community. Methods of support could include
notification of fair housing rights and responsibilities distributed in brochures located in
public buildings, public service announcements on the local access channel or similar
methods.
The City will continue to allow for the construction of higher occupancy housing
complexes on a case-by-case basis when possible, for all economic segments of the
community.
PROGRAM MONITORING
Performance monitoring for compliance to federal program requirements is scheduled at least
once annually for projects that are under service contract. Monitoring of federally funded
activities is undertaken for projects that are either under an annual or longer-term performance
period. In addition, the City undertakes an annual Single Audit according to the requirements of
the federal Office of Management and Budget. As standard practice, notification is made to HUD
on the availability of the City's annual audit.
URGENT OR COMMUNITY NEED
In the event of a local, state or federal disaster declaration for areas within the boundaries of the
City of Cupertino, the City will reserve the right to use CDBG funds to abate immediate and
necessary hazards. The funds may be used for staff efforts, grants or loans to affected parties, as
approved by the City Council and allowed under the federal regulations.
143
AMENDMENTS TO PLAN
Prior to the submission of any substantial amendment in the proposed use of funds, citizens will
be provided reasonable notice of, and the opportunity to comment on, any proposed Action Plan
amendments.
RELATIONSHIP OF THE ANNUAL PLAN TO THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN
G OAL 1 A SSIST IN THE CREATION AND PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR
-INCOME AND SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSEHOLDS.
LOWER
Objective: Suitable Living Environment
Outcome: Sustainability
Outcome Statement: Provide opportunities for suitable living environments with
improved/new sustainability
Indicators: 1. New housing units available to various income groups
2. Overall increase in housing stock
3. Reduction in households paying too much for housing
4. Number of parcels with changed land use designations
5. Number of second units created
Proposed 2011 Activity: Below Market Rate Program
2011 Goal:Create 15 Housing Units
G OAL 2 S UPPORT ACTIVITIES TO END HOMELESSNESS.
Objective: Suitable Living Environment
Outcome: Availability/Accessibility
Outcome Statement: Provide a suitable living environment with improved/new availability
Indicators: 1. Number of persons assisted with homeless services
2. Number of persons assisted with emergency rental assistance.
Proposed 2011 Goals: Provide homeless prevention services through Haven to Home and
emergency rental assistance through WVCS Comprehensive Assistance
Indicators: Provide homeless prevention services to 100 individuals
Provide emergency rental assistance to 100 eligible residents a year.
G OAL 3 S UPPORT ACTIVITIES THAT PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES, ELIMINATE BLIGHT,
AND/OR STRENGTHEN NEIGHBORHOODS.
Objective: Suitable Living Environment
Outcome: Availability/Accessibility
Outcome Statement: Provide funding to a variety of non-profits that assist low and very-low
income residents.
Indicators: 1. Support programs that provide transportation.
2. Provide funding for social service organizations that assist low
and very-low income households and special needs
population.
Proposed 2011 Activity: Fund a variety of public service agencies that provide services to low
and very-low income.
2011 Goal:Serve 1,000 low and very-low income households with support
services.
Provide 6,200 rider subsidies.
144
GOAL4 P ROMOTE FAIR HOUSING CHOICE.
Objective: Suitable Living Environment
Outcome: Availability/Accessibility
Outcome Statement: Provide a suitable living environment with improved/new availability
Indicators: 1. Number of outreach activities
2. Number of households with resolved fair housing disputes
Proposed 2011 Goals Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity – Fair Housing Services
Indicators: Distribute 1000 brochures. Resolve 10 Fair Housing cases.
G OAL 5 E XPAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Objective: Suitable Living Environment
Outcome: Availability/Accessibility
Outcome Statement:
Indicators: 1. Support local employment development and workforce
training programs
2. Support programs that facilitate small business development
Proposed 2011Goals: Serve 60 households through Nova program
Indicators: Provide employment counseling and job resources to 60 Cupertino
residents.
G OAL 6 P ROMOTE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
Objective: Suitable Living Environment
Outcome: Availability/Accessibility
Outcome Statement: Encourage and fund energy efficient improvements and modifications
for existing rental units serving extremely low, very low income and
low income households.
Indicators: 1. Fund energy efficient improvements and modifications for
existing rental units serving extremely low, very low income
and low income households.
Proposed 2011 Goals: Provide energy efficient improvements through Rebuilding Together
Silicon Valley
Indicators: Provide 5-8 homes with energy improvements.
145
Goal Goal
70101086426
Unmet Unmet
Need (a) Need (a)
147493817314141
Elderly Elderly
Low
Low
High High
Priority Priority
Medium Medium
146
Goal Goal
10101029116
Unmet Unmet
Need (a) Need (a)
483143583842
Large Related Large Related
Low Low Low
High
Priority Priority
Medium Medium
Goal Goal
120110905623
28
(a) (a)
NeedNeed
Unmet Unmet
23222030811376184
Small Related Small Related
sing problem, as reported by CHAS Data, Census, 2000.
16
Low
High High High
Priority Priority
Medium Medium
HUD Table 2A: Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan RENTERS 0-30% AMI 31-50% AMI 51-80% AMI OWNERS 0-30% AMI 31-50% AMI 51-80% AMI Section 215 Goals Notes:(a) Based on households with
houSources: SOCDS CHAS Data, 2009; City of Cupertino, 2010; BAE, 2010.
305123
0
10
Year 5 Goal Plan/Act.
305033
0
10
Year 4 Goal Plan/Act.
3350343
10
147
Year 3 Goal Plan/Act.
3003
543
10
Year 2 Goal Plan/Act.
351483
(cont’d)
1710
Year 1 Goal Plan/Act.
2
15205015
251715
5-YrGoal Plan/Act.
ner units
ental units
CDBG Acquisition of existing rProduction of new rental units Rehabilitation of existing rental units Rental assistance Acquisition of existing owProduction of new owner units Rehabilitation
of existing owner units
Homeownership assistance
HUD Table 2A: Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan
ATTACHMENT A
148
ATTACHMENT A
149
ATTACHMENT A
150
ATTACHMENT A
Legal Aide to Seniors
2011-12 Request: $9,717
Annual Goal: Serve 40 Cupertino seniors.
151
ATTACHMENT A
152
ATTACHMENT A
153
ATTACHMENT A
154
ATTACHMENT A
155
156
ATTACHMENTC
Community Development Block Grant Program Application
City of Cupertino
Fiscal Year 2011/2012
SECTION 1: COVER SHEET
A. Applicant Information
Legal Name of Organization:Senior Housing Solutions
Mailing Address:512 Valley Way
City, State, Zip Code:Milpitas, CA, 95035
Web Address:www.srhousingsolutions.org
Contact Person:Bob CampbellTitle:Executive Director
Email Address:bob@srhousingsolutions.org
Telephone Number:408-416-0271Fax Number:408-416-0278
Executive Director:Bob CampbellEmail:bob@srhousingsolutions.org
B. Project Overview
Project Name:Price Avenue Senior Residence Project
Location of Project Activity:19935 Price Avenue
City, State, Zip Code:Cupertino, CA 95014
Brief Project Description:
Senior Housing Solutions (SHS) is applying for $196,195 in rehab funds to complete Phase II of our Price Avenue
Senior Residence Project which will provide 5 units of affordable housing for extremely low-income seniors in the
City of Cupertino. In partnership we purchased the property and in January completed Phase I rehab. SHS will
develop the project to serve independently functioning seniors 60 years of age and older whose income is $1,500 a
month or less. Rent will be held to 30% of income and include utilities, phone, cable and laundry facilities.
C. Cupertino Funds Requested
CDBG Funding Request, FY 11/12:$196,195
Total Project Cost, FY 11/12:$196,195
Cost per unit (housing/services), FY 11/12:39,239
Is the Organization currently receiving funding?Yes
CDBG Funds Requested in FY10/11:$271,003
CDBG Funds Received in FY10/11:$0
SECTION 2: PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Project Overview and Target Population
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed Project including the specific activities to be undertaken and services
to be provided using funds from this application.
The mission of Senior Housing Solutions (SHS) is simple: To develop affordable housing to help extremely
low-income seniors improve their quality of life. Our innovative model combines housing, property management and
case management to achieve positive health and quality of life outcomes for our residents. Today the SHS provides
57 units of affordable housing for extremely low-income seniors in twelve single-family homes throughout Santa
Clara County.
The Price Senior Residence Project will use funds requested for Phase II rehab activities. The property located at
19935 Price Ave in the City of Cupertino was purchased with City BMR and Phase I construction was completed in
January. Upon completion of rehab the Project will provide affordable housing to 5 extremely low-income seniors.
Rents will be held at 30% of the seniors income. Our target is City of Cupertino residents who are seniors 60 years
of age and older who function independently and whose income is $1,500 per month or less.
At the completion of Phase II rehab actives will have added 1 bedroom and 1 bathroom in the existing footprint and
include installation of solar panels and exterior and interior rehab so that the house can adequately house 5
independently functioning seniors. Specific work includes kitchen remodel, remodel of the common areas of the
house, bathroom remodel, new windows, floor coverings, floor covering, interior and exterior paint, new HVAC
system as well as modifications and remodel of the kitchen and common areas in the house. Assuming funds are
available not later than April 1 we anticipate Phase II construction to be completed by June 15.
157
2. Describe the need(s) that the proposed Project addresses, its community impact, and how it addresses a need or
problem in relation to the Consolidated Plan.
The senior population in Santa Clara County is growing, and so is the number of seniors who struggle economically.
Based on research by Dr. Steven P. Wallace, Ph.D. UCLA School of Public Health, the estimated monthly income
needed for a senior to be Self-Sufficient in Santa Clara County is $1,928 per month. Fifty-five percent ($1,068) of
the cost is for housing. The average income of seniors living on Social Security Retirement in Santa Clara is $1,503
a month. In the County, there are 70,000 seniors living on Social Security whose monthly income is below $1,503. In
the City of Cupertino, income and housing trends are similar to those of the county except that the cost of housing
tends to be a bit higher.
Senior Housing Solutions addresses the underlying problem facing these seniors: poverty. Lack of stable housing,
threat of evictions, insufficient food, poor health, isolation, a lack of safety and security, and an endless stream of
financial emergencies are symptoms of poverty. Our unique housing model provides a permanent solution to these
quality of life problems for our residents. The outcome is sustainable permanent housing for seniors in a setting that
supports key quality of life indicators including economic, social, health and psychological factors as they age in
place.
The Price Avenue Senior Residence Project will have a positive impact on those we serve and the surrounding
community. Senior Housing Solutions provides the primary stabilizing factor in a seniors life housing that they can
afford within a comprehensive program that addresses continued housing security, safety, reduced dependence on
family members, increased access to needed services, maintained disposal income, improved social support, daily
household and community interaction and emotional support from peers and professional staff. Resident Outcomes:
our innovative housing and support services model continues to achieve positive outcomes for our residents including
a reduction in the feeling of loneliness, a decrease the occurrence of depression, an increase in physical activity, a
sense of safety and an overall increase in their quality of life. Community Outcomes: (1) Age/economic diversity of
neighborhoods in preserved. (2) The supply of affordable senior housing in Santa Clara County in increased through
program expansion. (3) Replication in other communities.
Throughout the Citys Consolidated Plan affordable housing and support service needs for seniors are rated as High.
Specifically: Priority Needs table 1B pg.45, Table 2A pg.46, Table 2B pg. 47 show HIGH priority need. Also related
is Goal A Policy 3.3 pg.17, Policy 3.4 pg.18, Policy 3.9 Implementation Prog. 26 on pg. 20-21, Goal D Policy 3-11
Implementation Prog. 32 pg. 22 all relate to affordable housing for extremely low-income seniors.
3. Describe the Project’s target population, including client eligibility requirements. Discuss how and if they are an
at-risk and/or under-served population.
The Price Avenue Senior Residence Project will serve seniors 60 years of age and older who are functionally
independently. We will target those among this population whose income is $1,500 or less monthly or about 20% of
the median. Most will have been living in temporary housing including with friends or family just prior to moving into
the Senior Residence. The project will result in the development of 5 units of affordable housing and include services
designed to achieve positive health and quality of life outcomes for our residents. Rent is kept at just 30% of income
ensuring our residents will never have to worry about a rent increase beyond their ability to pay.
4. What other private or government organizations are now or will be addressing the same needs identified herein?
List and describe the services provided by each in relation to the needs addressed. Explain how the proposed
program/project augments rather than duplicates the services of others. Describe how your agency collaborates with
other service providers.
There are numerous nonprofit and government organizations addressing the housing and support service needs of
seniors in our community. Our unique housing model has not been duplicated. From the design of the floor plan in the
house to the collaboration between our case management and property management services we are striving to
provide a permanent solution to those seniors in our community who are most challenged economically.
We leverage our organizational operations and service model with our strategic alliances. We have a broad array of
community agencies with whom our case management interfaces. Some common resources and partners used by
our case management include the Social Security and Veterans Administration, Indian Health Center, East Valley
Clinic, East Valley Mental Health, Mental Health Advocacy Project, Project Sentinel Valley Medical Center, In Home
Support Services, Multi-Service Senior Program, Senior Care Connection, VTA Outreach, Alcoholics Anonymous,
Meals on Wheels, Catholic Charities, and City Team, to highlight a few. In addition the Mt. View Community Services
Agency has provided us a letter of support for our project. We have also formed a formal collaborative project with
the Family and Children Services Agency designed to increase the resilience and communication skills of housing
158
residents.
Organizationally, our partnerships with the Cities of Campbell, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Milpitas, Los Gatos,
Cupertino, San Jose and County of Santa Clara Office of Affordable Housing are significant. Without them, our
housing opportunities would not be possible as they provide property acquisition and rehabilitation grants and
deferred loans.
5. State the number of unduplicated clients to be served by the proposed Project in the fiscal year.
Cupertino Clients:5Total Project Clients:5
6. Project Client Breakdown for Funding Requested:
2010-20112011-20122010-20112011-2012
ActualProposedActualProposed
CupertinoCupertinoCupertinoCupertino
TotalTotalTotalTotal
Extremely Low Income
5 62 5 72Youth (0-18 years)
(0%-30% AMI)
Very Low Income
Adults (19-62 years)
(31%-50% AMI)
Low Income
Seniors (63+ years) 5 62 5 72
(51%-80% AMI)
Moderate Income
Total All Ages
5 62 5 72
(81%-120% AMI)
Above Moderate
IncomeDisabled Individuals
(120%+ AMI)
Other Special
Total All Incomes
5625 72
Needs
B. Numeric Goals
1. For each activity, please indicate the goal for number of service units to be served.
1st2nd3rd4th
Annual
Activity
QuarterQuarterQuarterQuarter
complete rehab activieies 5 5
C. Project Administration and Monitoring
1. Use the table and space below to briefly describe how the project will be managed and administered, included
proposed staff time and staff functions.
TotalTotal% TimeCDBG
Position TitleProgram/Project DutiesAnnualHoursFor CDBGSalary
Salary/WeekActivityRequest
Executive Director manage construction $0
2. How will the effectiveness of your project be measured?
Jed Emerson Bloomberg, Senior Research Fellow in Philanthropy, Harvard Business School, speaks of SROI or
Social Return on Investment, which is a measure of social value creation resulting from the investment of financial or
social capital. Based on this concept, we developed a Logic Model that is our plan for success.
In the past two years, over 80% of our residents have responded to our evaluation which is completed each year
between November and January. Following are 12-month goals we will target for residents at the Price Avenue
house measured through our annual survey:
46% of residents report a decrease in depression
60% of residents report a decrease in feeling lonely
74% of residents report an increase in quality of life
79% of residents report they have another house mate they can confide in when feeling troubled
95% of residents report that they feel safe
Over what time frame? 12 months
3. Describe your written policies and/or established procedures for assuring persons with disabilities and/or limited
English proficiency access to services and benefits.
159
Non-discrimination Policies and Reasonable Accommodation Policies are in place. We face several institutional
restrictions in what we can know about a client before they move in to our housing. Because we receive HUD funding
for the capital projects we must follow fair housing practices regarding discrimination.
Our current residents speak primary languages that include Farsi, Chinese, Japanese, English, Bulgarian and
Russian. We cannot manipulate the residences so that Chinese speakers can live with Chinese speakers or Russian
speakers can live with Russian speakers. However, our Case Manager works to continue to support residents to
remain connected to their communities. Most have rather strong connections with their ethnic communities and
families. In fact, the most reliable source for translation support we have found comes readily through these
resident's community and family.
Our office hours are Monday Friday 8:00-4:30. Seniors do not have to come into the office in order to gain access to
our services. We do our eligibility screening over the phone. Upon becoming eligible, seniors are put on the waiting
list until a vacancy occurs. All of the seniors entered onto our waiting list receive a brochure that describes our
housing and services. We encourage seniors on the waiting list to contact us whenever they want to and especially
to let us know if their contact information has changed. When a vacancy occurs we contact the senior at the top of
the waiting list to make an appointment to show the room and see house. If they like it we take a deposit, complete
our application process that includes a criminal background and credit check and then they move in.
Though we do not require anyone to come to the office for the initial eligibility screening the office is physically
accessible. Houses are designed to facilitate accessibility and functionality. Individual accommodations are made to
ensure access to our housing.
4. Provide a brief general description of your agency and the services provided. Include a description of your
agency’s experience in providing the proposed services. If previously funded, what were the goals and
accomplishments of CDBG projects?
The mission of Senior Housing Solutions is to develop affordable housing to help extremely
low-income seniors improve their quality of life. Our innovative model combines shared housing
in single-family homes, property management and case management to achieve positive health
and quality of life outcomes for independent seniors whose income is less than $18,000
annually. Rent is kept at just 30% of income ensuring our residents will never have to worry
about a rent increase beyond their ability to pay.
By providing the primary stabilizing factor in a seniors life housing that they can afford within a
comprehensive program that addresses continued housing security, safety, reduced
dependence on family members, increased access to needed services, maintained disposal
income, improved social support, daily household and community interaction and emotional
support from peers and professional staff, Senior Housing Solutions achieves its primary goal:
to have a positive impact on the economic, social, health and psychological needs of our
residents.
Today, there are 12 SHS homes in operation throughout Santa Clara County. An additional
three houses will open by December 2011. Currently there are 57 seniors residing in our
housing. The average age of current residents is 72 years; the average monthly income of our
residents is $987. Rent in our houses, including utilities, cable, laundry facilities and phone is
just $296 a month!
5. Explain how your agency collects income and race/ethnicity data.
As mentioned above we have certain restrictions prior to residency in our housing. As part of the application process
income eligibility is established by checking 2nd party documents i.e. SSI letters, bank accounts, pay stubs etc. This
is then done annually to ensure continued eligibility in our housing.
Our application process also asks for race and ethnicity data. However, due to fair housing requirements, we cannot
160
require this information is completed.
D. Consolidated Plan Goals
1. Please indicate which Consolidated Plan Goals will be met by the Project and briefly describe how your
Project/Activity meets the Goals.
Goal #1: Assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for lower-income and special needs
households.
Goal #2: Support activities to end homelessness.
Goal #3: Support activities that provide basic services, eliminate blight, and/or strengthen neighborhoods.
Goal #4: Promote fair housing choice.
Goal #5: Expand economic opportunities for low-income households.
Goal #6: Promote environmental sustainability.
2. Explain how you will meet these goals.
We will conduct rehab activities to complete Phase II construction activities for our Price Avenue Senior Residence
Project. Rehab activities in Phase II include metal work, decking, finishing work in bathrooms, bedrooms, utility
room, common areas and exterior, installation of appliances, exhaust ducting, ducting, plumbing, HVAC system,
electrical and utility hookups.
We have already begun affirmative marketing of the house to the Cupertino community. Initially there were 28
residents who indicated an interest in the house. Over the past month we have contacted each of these original 28.
To date a total of 12 Cupertino residents have indicated that they remain interested in living at the house. Once
Phase II funding is secured we will begin showing the house to these 12 perspective residents. We hope to begin
rent up not later than June earlier if possible.
Once residents move in we will begin our property management and case management services.
E. HUD Performance Measures
HUD requires that recipients of federal funding assess the outcomes of their programs. Please identify which HUD
objective and HUD outcome will be addressed by this project.
1. Objectives:Provide Decent Affordable Housing
2. Outcomes:Improve affordability
SECTION 3: FINANCIAL AND OTHER ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
A. Agency Information
Non-profit with 501(c)(3) Status? YesFaith-based organization? No
Community Based Development Organization (CBDO)? No
Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) ? Yes
Other Type of Organization? Describe:
DUNS Number: 19778672
B. Total Agency Budget
2011-20122010-20112009-20102008-2009
Budget Item
Administration $91,161 $59,615 $27,859 $61,369
Fundraising $33,149 $19,872 $6,965 $18,492
Proposed Project (Total budget) $196,195 $0 $0 $0
All Other Programs $704,426 $582,902 $661,660 $536,263
Total Agency Budget
$1,024,931$662,389$696,484$616,124
C. Program Budget (Fiscal Year 2011-2012)
2010-2011% Change from
2011-2012
CDBGFY 10/11 - FY
Proposed Project Expenses
CDBG Request
Allocation11/12
Salaries/Benefits/Payroll/Taxes
Office Supplies
Communication
161
Publications/Printing/Advertising
Travel
Rent/Lease/Mortgage
Utilities
Insurance
Equipment Rental/Maintenance
Audit/Legal/Professional Services (for
CDBG portion only)
Direct Services (Funding for specific
service such as a meal, ride)
Contracted Services
Other $0 $196,195
Total Expenses
$0$196,195
List below your funding sources for 2011/12 by jurisdiction and source:
FY2011/12 Revenue Source
CDBG AmountOther SourceOther AmountTotal
by Jurisdiction
Cupertino $196,195 $196,195
Total
$196,195 $0 $196,195
1. Does the Organization have a HUD-approved indirect cost plan? No
2. Does your agency charge fees for the services that you are requesting funding for? If so, please attach a fee
schedule. No
3. If your organization is not leveraging the requested CDBG funds with other funds, please explain why.
This request is for Phase II construction of our Price Avenue Senior Residence. The City assisted with BMR funds
for Acquisition. These funds were leveraged by the Housing Trust. The City provided Phase I construction funds from
CDBG and CDBG-R. Phase II Construction funds via this CDBG application have no leveraged funds.
D. Other Information - Attachments
Check each line item that you will attach. Attachments must be uploaded(?).
1. Please submit the following documents in support of your application:
Articles of Incorporation/Bylaws.BYLAWS_Senior_Housing_Solutions_Revised_January_25_2007.pdf
SHS_Articles_of_Incorporation.pdf
Authorization - Download this document,Authorization_Attachment_for_Cupertino_CDBG_March_2011.doc
print and sign it, and upload the signed
document.
2. If your application is selected for funding, you will be required to submit the information below at a later
date:
Policy & Procedures Manual. Include policy
prohibiting discrimination, grievance
procedures, and conflict of interest.
Nonprofit Determination. Submit
determination letters from the Federal
Internal Revenue Service and the State
Franchise Tax Board documenting the
organization is tax exempt.
List of Board of Directors. Include the
name, telephone number, address, and
occupation or affiliation of each member.
Identify the principal officers of the
162
governing body.
Authorization to Request Funds.
Documentation must be submitted of the
governing body's authorization to submit the
funding request. This consists of a copy of
the minutes of the meeting in which the
governing body's resolution, motion, or
other official action is recorded.
Designation of Authorized Official.
Documentation must be submitted of the
governing body's action authorizing the
representative of the agency to negotiate
for and contractually bind the agency. This
consists of a signed letter from the
Chairperson of the governing body providing
the name, title, address, and telephone
number of each authorized individual.
Organizational Chart. Include the
organization's administrative framework and
staff positions.
Financial Statement and Audit. Describe any
findings or concerns that were cited in the
audit or in any accompanying management
letter, particularly pertaining to the use of
CDBG funds. Also, describe any actions
taken to correct identified findings or
concerns.
Resume of Chief Program Administrator.
Resume of Chief Fiscal Officer.
Proof of Liability Insurance.
Program Manager SignatureBob Campbell
Date Signed03/01/2011
163
Community Development Block Grant Program Application
City of Cupertino
Fiscal Year 2011/2012
SECTION 1: COVER SHEET
A. Applicant Information
Legal Name of Organization:Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley
Mailing Address:2827 Aiello Drive
City, State, Zip Code:San Jose, CA 95111
Web Address:
Contact Person:Bev JacksonTitle:Executive Director
Email Address:bjackson@rebuildingtogether-sv.org
Telephone Number:(408) 578-9519Fax Number:
Executive Director:Beverley JacksonEmail:bjackson@rebuildingtogether-sv.org
B. Project Overview
Project Name:Rebuilding Housing Repair and Rehabilitation Program
Location of Project Activity:2827 Aiello Drive
City, State, Zip Code:San Jose, CA 95111
Brief Project Description:
Rebuilding Together will preserve affordable housing by providing safety, energy efficiency, accessibility and mobility
repairs and improvements for low income homeowners in Cupertino. Our project strengthens the resiliency of
low-income homeowners as well as the neighborhoods in which they live.
C. Cupertino Funds Requested
CDBG Funding Request, FY 11/12:$60,000
Total Project Cost, FY 11/12:$60,000
Cost per unit (housing/services), FY 11/12:12,000.
Is the Organization currently receiving funding?
CDBG Funds Requested in FY10/11:$56,400
CDBG Funds Received in FY10/11:$56,400
SECTION 2: PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Project Overview and Target Population
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed Project including the specific activities to be undertaken and services
to be provided using funds from this application.
Rebuilding Together (RT) will provide home safety repairs and mobility and accessibility improvements for five or
more homes (5-8 unduplicated beneficiaries) for very low-income people in Cupertino in 11/12, with the primary
consideration being the correction of safety hazards. All work is at no cost to the clients and can include: wheelchair
ramps, grab bars, railings, improved lighting installations, stair and step modifications for walkers, bath chairs, hand
held shower adapters, tub cut outs, door handle and faucet replacement for accessibility, smoke alarms, door,
window and lock repairs, roof repairs and replacement, interior and exterior painting, yard cleanup, minor plumbing
repairs, minor electrical repairs, appliance replacement, flooring (linoleum, carpet, or tile) repairs and replacement,
heating installation and repairs, outdoor lighting and fencing improvements for safety, elimination of tripping hazards,
replacement and/or repair of windows, earthquake proofing of water heaters. We improve the safety of the living
environment by fixing hazardous conditions.
The majority of repairs are completed by volunteers. Some of the specialized work, such as electrical, roofing,
carpet installation and plumbing involve contract staff of Rebuilding Together. Rebuilding Together program staff
schedule and coordinate all repair work utilizing either volunteers or skilled trade contractors.
Each October and April, groups of volunteers armed with paintbrushes, saws, hammers and shovels join together
over one or two Saturdays to repair and rebuild homes and community facilities, dedicating their time in the spirit of
service and community during Rebuilding Day Projects.
Additionally, our Safe At Home program leverages our skilled volunteers that wish to contribute on a weekly basis,
by providing home modifications and minor safety repairs throughout the year.
164
2. Describe the need(s) that the proposed Project addresses, its community impact, and how it addresses a need or
problem in relation to the Consolidated Plan.
The Rebuilding Housing Repair and Rehabiliation Program will allow very low-income homeowners to remain in
affordable, safe and decent housing. Residents of Cupertino who live on a fixed income may be less able to afford
little beyond the most basic needs. On fixed incomes, even necessary expenses such as prescription medications
can be difficult to afford while other important expenses, such as repairs to resolve unsafe or unsightly conditions,
may be near impossible for older homeowners to afford. Older adults are more likely to live in homes that they own,
with homeownership rates over 80% for Americans over 55 years of age, more than any other age group in 2008
(U.S. Census Bureau, 2008). A significant portion of Cupertino older persons are aging in place in homes they
purchased more than 30 years ago. Although the homes may have increased in value, residents find that their fixed
income is less able to cover routine upkeep or repairs. Most do not want to move from their homes, but others find
they could not afford to move even if they would choose to do so. Benefits of aging in place including maintaining
seniors social networks and limiting the negative effects of relocation and dramatic transitions, including the financial
expense of relocating (Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, 2001). The Housing Repair Program
addresses this problem by allowing homeowners to remain in safe and affordable housing for as long as possible.
Rebuilding Together is the only community-based non-profit organization providing repairs to homeowners in need at
no cost to the homeowner.
Our projects are life-changing for the residents and the neighborhood. Imagine finally feeling warm and safe in your
own home: your heater now works, and youre no longer afraid of falling on torn carpet or curling linoleum. Imagine
the change to your outlook on life when living in surroundings that nourish your spirit and make you feel better about
yourself.
3. Describe the Project’s target population, including client eligibility requirements. Discuss how and if they are an
at-risk and/or under-served population.
The target population are low-income, homeowners that require safety and accessibility repairs and modifications to
provide for decent, affordable and safe housing. On average, a Rebuilding Together client is 72 years of age, has
lived in their home for over 26 years and has an annual income of about $21,000.
Homeowners submit an application to initiate the intake process. Rebuilding staff/volunteer conducts a telephone
interview and schedules a site visit to determine project need and process for repair completion. The focus of
interviews and visits is to evaluate the financial and repair needs of the client and the impact the repairs will make on
homeowners safety, warmth, and independence. Once a homeowner has been approved for the program, they must
submit proof of home ownership and income verification (accepted documentation includes social security benefits
statements, the most recent tax return, or recent pay stubs) before repairs can be made. Determinations of income
eligibility are made using the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developments income limits. Once homeowners
are approved for the program and their documentation has been submitted, homeowners information and application
are maintained in Rebuilding Togethers secure database to ensure accurate tracking of all clients.
4. What other private or government organizations are now or will be addressing the same needs identified herein?
List and describe the services provided by each in relation to the needs addressed. Explain how the proposed
program/project augments rather than duplicates the services of others. Describe how your agency collaborates with
other service providers.
Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley is the only organization that provides free home repairs for low-income
homeowners in the City of Cupertino, leveraging the skills and energy of volunteers, community groups and local faith
communities and corporations.
5. State the number of unduplicated clients to be served by the proposed Project in the fiscal year.
Cupertino Clients:6Total Project Clients:10
6. Project Client Breakdown for Funding Requested:
2010-20112011-20122010-20112011-2012
ActualProposedActualProposed
CupertinoCupertinoCupertinoCupertino
TotalTotalTotalTotal
Extremely Low Income
3 3 Youth (0-18 years)
(0%-30% AMI)
Very Low Income
2 2 Adults (19-62 years) 2 2
(31%-50% AMI)
165
Low Income
1 1 Seniors (63+ years) 4 4
(51%-80% AMI)
Moderate Income
Total All Ages
10 0 10 0
(81%-120% AMI)
Above Moderate
IncomeDisabled Individuals 4 4
(120%+ AMI)
Other Special
Total All Incomes
606 0
Needs
B. Numeric Goals
1. For each activity, please indicate the goal for number of service units to be served.
1st2nd3rd4th
Annual
Activity
QuarterQuarterQuarterQuarter
Homes Completed with Repairs 1 2 1 2 6
Repairs 4 8 4 8 24
C. Project Administration and Monitoring
1. Use the table and space below to briefly describe how the project will be managed and administered, included
proposed staff time and staff functions.
TotalTotal% TimeCDBG
Position TitleProgram/Project DutiesAnnualHoursFor CDBGSalary
Salary/WeekActivityRequest
Executive Director Overall Agency supervision 2 $0
Client Services client outreach, application processing
4 $0
Coordinatorand selection
Oversees S@H repair work, reviews
Safe At Home Managerwork scope, and supervises contract and 2 $0
volunteer repairs.
Coordinates logistics, work scope and
Program Director 2 $0
Rebuilding Day Program
Completes safety repairs and supervises
Repair Technician 4 $0
volunteer work projects
2. How will the effectiveness of your project be measured?
Homeowners, project management staff and volunteer project leaders sign off on completed work. This has the
effect of (1) assuring that the project and components have been completed and (2) provides an opportunity to
assess the results via our five criteria: safety, warmth, independence, financial status, and neighborhood health and
vitality. Our results have indicated that our efforts have been effective, have provided a targeted solution (address
the need), and have been life-changing for everyone involved. Respondents have said that they feel safer in their
homes because repairs have been made to crumbling steps, leaking roofs, and other dangerous conditions.
Over what time frame?
3. Describe your written policies and/or established procedures for assuring persons with disabilities and/or limited
English proficiency access to services and benefits.
Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley Program staff speaks Spanish and Tagalog languages and both are available for
these oral translations. Accomodations are made for persons with diabilities that additional assistance with
application process and completion. Rebuilding Together volunteers are on-call for oral translation in Vietnamese,
Mandarin and Portuguese and are scheduled through Rebuilding Together Program staff. Partnerships with other
senior services and centers have also assisted with client interviews. Rebuilding Together has also been successful
in matching the language needs of the clients with community service clubs and corporate teams to support the
client, during Rebuilding service days. Many of our volunteers from the local Silicon Valley, high tech corporate
community are pleased to share their language skills and translate for Vietnamese and Mandarin clients.
4. Provide a brief general description of your agency and the services provided. Include a description of your
agency’s experience in providing the proposed services. If previously funded, what were the goals and
accomplishments of CDBG projects?
166
Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley has been in operations since 1991. Since our inception, we
have mobilized 23,900 volunteers to repair and upgrade 1201 homes and nonprofit facilities
throughout Santa Clara County. In the first two quarters of 2010-11 RT provided 205 repairs to
6 low-income Cupertino homes. In total our work impacted over 9,523 County residents in 2010
through 223 project locations. Rebuilding projects leverage community dollars with the
experience and willingness of Rebuilding volunteers to impact the health and safety of area
residents. Our projects are life-changing for the residents, the neighborhood, and the
volunteers. Imagine finally feeling warm and safe in your own home: your heater now works,
and youre no longer afraid of falling on torn carpet or curling linoleum. Imagine the change to
your view of the world to live in surroundings that nourish your spirit and make you feel better
about yourself. We can all identify with feeling good about where we live, and volunteers
complete a project and leave tired but with big smiles. They know they have profoundly
changed the quality of daily experience for someone else. In so doing, they change the quality
of their own lives as well.
5. Explain how your agency collects income and race/ethnicity data.
All clients submit proof of household income and homeownership prior to work completion. Race and ethnicity data
survey is collected at the time of program application.
D. Consolidated Plan Goals
1. Please indicate which Consolidated Plan Goals will be met by the Project and briefly describe how your
Project/Activity meets the Goals.
Goal #1: Assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for lower-income and special needs
households.
Goal #2: Support activities to end homelessness.
Goal #3: Support activities that provide basic services, eliminate blight, and/or strengthen neighborhoods.
Goal #4: Promote fair housing choice.
Goal #5: Expand economic opportunities for low-income households.
Goal #6: Promote environmental sustainability.
2. Explain how you will meet these goals.
Rebuilding Together will repair and rehabilitate owner occupied housing units for extremely, very, and low-income
homeowners who are often seniors and/or families with disabled family members. All work is completed at no cost
to the client. Repairs remediate health and safety issues in the home, necessary for the owner to continue living
there. This project will service residents from the entire City of Cupertino. 100% of RT clients have incomes 80% or
less of the median income.
E. HUD Performance Measures
HUD requires that recipients of federal funding assess the outcomes of their programs. Please identify which HUD
objective and HUD outcome will be addressed by this project.
1. Objectives:Create Suitable Living Environments
2. Outcomes:Improve affordability
SECTION 3: FINANCIAL AND OTHER ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
A. Agency Information
Non-profit with 501(c)(3) Status? YesFaith-based organization? No
Community Based Development Organization (CBDO)? No
Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) ? No
Other Type of Organization? Describe:
DUNS Number: 017547055
B. Total Agency Budget
2011-20122010-20112009-20102008-2009
Budget Item
Administration $75,200 $75,200 $70,276 $62,708
Fundraising $71,000 $73,873 $81,779 $57,914
167
Proposed Project (Total budget) $60,000 $56,400 $40,000 $40,000
All Other Programs $880,000 $840,557 $796,621 $927,888
Total Agency Budget
$1,086,200$1,046,030$988,676$1,088,510
C. Program Budget (Fiscal Year 2011-2012)
2010-2011% Change from
2011-2012
CDBGFY 10/11 - FY
Proposed Project Expenses
CDBG Request
Allocation11/12
Salaries/Benefits/Payroll/Taxes
Office Supplies
Communication $0 $0
Publications/Printing/Advertising $900 $900 0%
Travel
Rent/Lease/Mortgage $4,260 $4,400 3%
Utilities $1,000 $1,000 0%
Insurance $800 $900 12%
Equipment Rental/Maintenance $750 $800 7%
Audit/Legal/Professional Services (for
CDBG portion only)
Direct Services (Funding for specific
service such as a meal, ride)
Contracted Services $12,000 $13,000 8%
Other $36,690 $39,000 6%
Total Expenses
$56,400$60,000 6%
List below your funding sources for 2011/12 by jurisdiction and source:
FY2011/12 Revenue Source
CDBG AmountOther SourceOther AmountTotal
by Jurisdiction
Cupertino $60,000 $60,000
Total
$60,000 $0 $60,000
1. Does the Organization have a HUD-approved indirect cost plan? Yes
2. Does your agency charge fees for the services that you are requesting funding for? If so, please attach a fee
schedule. No
3. If your organization is not leveraging the requested CDBG funds with other funds, please explain why.
D. Other Information - Attachments
Check each line item that you will attach. Attachments must be uploaded(?).
1. Please submit the following documents in support of your application:
Articles of Incorporation/Bylaws.Articles_of_Incorporation.pdf
Authorization - Download this document, print and sign it, andsignature.pdf
upload the signed document.
2. If your application is selected for funding, you will be required to submit the information below at a later
date:
Policy & Procedures Manual. Include policy prohibiting
discrimination, grievance procedures, and conflict of interest.
Nonprofit Determination. Submit determination letters from the
Federal Internal Revenue Service and the State Franchise Tax
Board documenting the organization is tax exempt.
168
List of Board of Directors. Include the name, telephone number,
address, and occupation or affiliation of each member. Identify
the principal officers of the governing body.
Authorization to Request Funds. Documentation must be
submitted of the governing body's authorization to submit the
funding request. This consists of a copy of the minutes of the
meeting in which the governing body's resolution, motion, or
other official action is recorded.
Designation of Authorized Official. Documentation must be
submitted of the governing body's action authorizing the
representative of the agency to negotiate for and contractually
bind the agency. This consists of a signed letter from the
Chairperson of the governing body providing the name, title,
address, and telephone number of each authorized individual.
Organizational Chart. Include the organization's administrative
framework and staff positions.
Financial Statement and Audit. Describe any findings or concerns
that were cited in the audit or in any accompanying management
letter, particularly pertaining to the use of CDBG funds. Also,
describe any actions taken to correct identified findings or
concerns.
Resume of Chief Program Administrator.
Resume of Chief Fiscal Officer.
Proof of Liability Insurance.
Program Manager SignatureBeverley Jackson
Date Signed03/04/2011
169
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3227www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
FiscalYear 2011-12FeeSchedule
RecommendedAction
AdoptResolutionNo. 11-_______,approvingthe2011-12feeschedule.
Description
The newfee schedule,effectiveJuly 1, 2011, carries overthecurrent schedulewith various
changesasdescribed.
Discussion
Summary
Userfeesarereviewedeachyearinconjunctionwith budget preparation.City policyisto
ensurethat,totheextent possible,feescoverthecost of providing services. Themajorityof
thefees proposedforadoptionare based on theactualcostto performtheservice.Somefees,
suchasthoseforGeneralandRecreation purposes,are based on marketconditions orfees
chargedby outsideservice providers or othergovernments.
Manyfeeshave notchanged sincethelastincrease on July 1, 2009. Overthe pasttwoyears,
theBayAreaconsumerpriceindex hasincreased3.5%.Staff salaryand benefits,including
pensions,willincreasebyapproximately 6.5%from 2010 through 2012.Afterimplementing
processingefficiencies, staffrecommendsPlanning,Building,andEngineeringfeeincreases
of 3%,in ordertokeepupwiththecost of providing service.Sincethesefeesareprimarily
developmentrelated, not keeping up withthecostof serviceresultsinaGeneralFund subsidy
to developers.Inaddition,afewfeeclassificationsareaddedtoreflectexisting processesand
permitsandtoimproveclarity,consistency,andaccuracy.A small portionofGeneraland
Recreationfeesarealsochanged.
Becausefeesgointoeffectatleast sixtydaysafteradoption,the scheduleis broughttothe
Councilatthistimein orderto havethefeeseffectiveatthe beginningofthe newfiscalyear.
Schedule A -GeneralFees
·Mostly unchanged.
·Fingerprintingandfalsealarmchargesrisebecause of higherlawenforcementcosts.
·Municipal parking violationfines up $5 dueto higherCountycharges of $3andto keep
finesinlinewith otherjurisdictions.
·Smallincome businesslicenseanddatabasereportfeesincreased $1 inconjunctionwith
theconsumer priceindex.
170
Schedule B – Engineering FeeChanges
·3%increase.
·Geotechnical, structural,landscape plan,and stormwatermanagement planreviews
involving outside specialistsarerecommendedtohavea $1,000 to $5,000 refundable
deposittocoverthecostofthereview.
·SimilartoPlanningandBuildingcurrentpractice,a standard hourlyrateof $130 may be
chargedforlarge projectsrequiringalevelof staff support greaterthanthe scope ofwork
includedintheregularfee schedule.
ScheduleC – Planning FeeChanges
·3%increase.
·PlannedDevelopmentPermitclassifications havebeenaddedtotheexistingConditional
UsePermitfeecategories.ItreplacesConditionalUsePermitsfor projectsinPlanned
DevelopmentZonesandischargedatthe samerate.
·A newfeeforAdministrativeConditionalUsePermitsinvolving usesthataregenerally
acceptableinthecommercialzones butrequireadditional stafflevelreviewand
discretiontoensurethatthereare no negativeimpactstothe surroundingusesand
neighborhood.Currently,thesetypes of permitsare processed onlywithaMinor
ConditionalUsePermitattwicethefee.
·A newfeeforamendingaConditionalUsePermit orPlannedDevelopmentPermitat half
thecost ofissuinganewpermit.
·A new $500 feecoveringtheReasonableAccommodationreviewandapproval process
describedinthezoningordinance.Currentlythereis no feeforthis processthat
necessitatesfour hours of stafftime.
·A new $173 feetoresearchandissueaPublicConvenienceandNecessityLetterrequired
bytheDepartmentofAlcoholicBeverageControlwhena businessisapplyingforan
alcoholic beveragelicensewherethereisa highconcentration of suchlicensesand/ora
higherthanaveragecrimerateexists.Similarto stafftimeforaZoningVerification
Letter.
ScheduleD – BuildingFeeChanges
·3%increase.
·Toencouragealternativeenergysystems, ElectricVehicleChargingStationandSolar
WaterHeating permitfeeswill beissuedbytheCityatareducedfee of $100thatis half
thecost ofreviewandinspection.
·To better servethecommunity,a small number ofmiscellaneousfeesareaddedtoclarify
certainchargesthatarealready beingassessed underageneralcategory. These
additionalfeeitems helpstaffandthe public quicklyidentifyaparticularfeecategory
andtaketheguessworkout of decidingwhichlineitem bestfitsthe service provided.
Thisimprovestheconsistencyandaccuracyofthe overall permitfee.
171
Schedule E – RecreationFees
·Mostly unchanged.
·ModifiedtheCommunityHallrentalfeesto beconsistentwithQuinlanCommunity
CenterCupertinoRoomcharges.
·MontaVistaRecreationCenterandCreeksideParkBuildingrentalfeesincreasedto
bringthechargesinlinewith similarfacilitiesinSunnyvale,SantaClara,Mountain
View,andtheQuinlanCenter.
FiscalImpact
Approximately $82,400 inadditionalGeneralFundrevenueswillresultfromthefeeincreases.
Notadoptingtheincreasesmeansthatthe highercost of providingthese serviceswill not be
fullyrecoveredbyfeesandthe servicecostwillcompetewithfunds usedforCity services
benefittingthegeneralpublic.
_____________________________________
Preparedby:DavidWoo,FinanceDirector
Reviewedby:CarolA.Atwood,DirectorofAdministrativeServices
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachments:Resolution
FeeSchedule Table ofContents
FeeScheduleA – General
FeeScheduleB – Engineering
FeeScheduleC – Planning
FeeScheduleD –Building
FeeSchedule E -Recreation
172
RESOLUTIONNO:11-
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCUPERTINO
RESCINDINGRESOLUTIONNUMBER 10-072
ANDADOPTINGUSERFEES
WHEREAS,theState ofCaliforniarequiresfeeschargedfor servicerendered nottoexceed
thecost of delivering said services;and
WHEREAS,a public hearing has been heldtoreview userfees;and
WHEREAS,theCityCouncil oftheCity ofCupertino hasestablishedguidelinesfor setting
userfees;
NOW, THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDthat:
1.Userfeesareestablished perattachedSchedulesAthorough E
2.UserfeesareeffectiveJuly 1, 2011
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeeting oftheCityCouncil oftheCity ofCupertino
this 5th day ofApril, 2011 bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
____________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
173
CITY OF CUPERTINO
SUMMARY OF USER FEES
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
DepartmentSchedule
GeneralA
EngineeringB
Planning C
BuildingD
RecreationE
174
Changes indicated
CITY OF CUPERTINO
in strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule A - General
Photocopies - per sheet$0.20
Microfilm/Microfiche Printout$0.50/frame
Budget Documents - CD Only$13.00 each
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) - CD Only$13.00 each
Returned Check Charge$25.00
Late Payment on 30 Day Delinquent City Invoices12% per annum
Property Liens Administrative Fee$40/book/block/parcel lien
Municipal Code BookVendor Invoice
Williamson Act Filings$105.00
Candidate Statement Fee (County Regulated Fee)Current County Registrar Cost
Video/Audio Service
VHS$13.00/tape
DVD$21.00/DVD
CD$13.00/CD
Audio Cassette$2.15/tape
Notary Fee (State Regulated Fee)$10.00/signature
Fingerprinting Processing (State $32 plus City County Fee $13 $20)
$45.00$ 52.00
Handbill Permit$60.00
Renewals$30.00
Solicitor Permit (Includes fingerprinting)$90.00
Renewals$45.00
Massage Establishment Fee (Includes fingerprinting/background$349.00
check and business start-up inspection)
Establishment with Therapist Permit$379.00
Renewals (Includes two inspections per year)$90.00
Massage Therapist Fee (Includes fingerprinting/background ck)$289.00
Therapist with Managing Employee$319.00
Renewals$60.00
Massage Managing Employee (Includes fingerprint/bkgrnd ck)$289.00
Managing Employee with Therapist Permit$319.00
Renewals$60.00
Massage Permit Appeal (Denial/Revocation)$155.00
Taxi Driver Permit (Includes fingerprinting/background check$300.00
Renewals$180.00
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\PROPOSEDFee Schedule_A_General 2011.xlsx
175
Changes indicated
CITY OF CUPERTINO
in strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule A - General
All Municipal Code Parking Violations (including County and State fees)$55.00$ 60.00
CVC Parking Citation Dismissals Admin Fee (State Regulated Fee)$25.00
Noise Variances$174.00
Duplicate Business Licenses$27.00
Small Income Business License$65.00$ 66.00
Business License Database$105.00$ 106.00
New Business Monthly Reports$22.00/month
$8.80 $8.95/day/vendor
Community Festivals
$2.20 $2.25/week/vendor
Farmers Market
$9.50 $9.65/month/vendor
Flea Markets
Sign Removal (Public Right-of-Way)$30.00/sign
Dangerous Dog Annual Registration Fee$180.00
Internet Processing Fee$2.00/transaction
False Alarms$150.00$ 153.00
Petitions for Reconsideration$259.00
Abatement FeeActual Cost *
Compilation of New Records (requests greater than 1/2 hour)Actual Cost *
Graffiti CleanupActual Cost *
Event Video Taping/EditingActual Cost *
Damage to City PropertyActual Cost *
Grounds, Streets, Facilities, Traffic Engineering/Maintenance
Code EnforcementActual Cost *
Public Requests for GIS Printed Maps
Standard pre-formatted maps
Plotted maps$25.00
Printed maps$2.00
Custom request mapsActual Cost *
Prints or plots of aerial photography, see Engineering fees
Public Requests for GIS Data
Digital data layers for GIS data$25.00/layer
$200.00 for all city layers
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\PROPOSEDFee Schedule_A_General 2011.xlsx
176
Changes indicated
CITY OF CUPERTINO
in strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule A - General
Custom request data layers on CD-ROMActual Cost *
Ortho-rectified aerial photography$25.00/tile
$300.00 full City of Cupertino (153 tiles)
Vendor Invoice plus 10% City
Outside Agency Review / Services
Admin Fee
* Actual cost is: 1) Employee hourly rate plus 55% for benefits and overhead, and 2) cost of materials,
contractors and supplies.
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\PROPOSEDFee Schedule_A_General 2011.xlsx
177
Changes indicated
CITY OF CUPERTINO
in strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
3% increase unless
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
otherwise noted.
Schedule B - Engineering
Street Cuts Miscellaneous
- Cost of Improvements $10,000 or under$232.00$239.00
- Cost of Improvements between $10,001 and $15,000$347.00$357.00
- Cost of Improvements $15,001 and over5% of cost
- Utility, greater of $1,507 $1,552 minimum or 5% of cost of improve.
$1,507 minimum$1,552.00 minimum
Grading permit; greater of $2,317 $2,387 min. or 6% of cost of improve.
$2,317 minimum$2,387.00 minimum
Parcel Map/Tract Map (Map Checking Fee)
- Parcel Map (1-4 lots)$3,765.00$3,878.00
- Tract Map (> 4 lots)$7,817.00$8,052.00
Plan Check and Inspection
- Review of Building Permit Only$580.00$597.00
Review of Public/Private Improvement Plans:
- Residential; greater of $2,468 $2,542 min. or 5% of cost of improve.
$2,468 minimum$2,542.00 minimum
- Commercial; greater of $3,982 $4,101 min. or 6% of cost of improve.
$3,982 minimum$4,101.00 minimum
Geotechnical Review*Cost of review + 10%
$2,000.00 deposit required
Structural Review*Cost of review + 10%
$2,000.00 deposit required
Green Bldg Code Landscape Plan Review Fee*Cost of review + 10%
2
(applies to 10k ft or greater development area in 2011)
$1,000.00 deposit required
C3 Stormwater Management Plan Review Fee*Cost of review + 10%
2
(applies to 10k ft or greater development area in 2011)
$5,000.00 deposit required
*Per Outside Agency Review/Services on Schedule A - General
Confirmation of Planning Applications$250.00$258.00
Annexation (plus County filing fee)$1,620.00$1,669.00
Certificates of Compliance$1,389.00$1,431.00
Encroachment Permits
- Residential$232.00$239.00
- Non-Residential$232.00$239.00
- Annual Utility Company$405.00$417.00
- Pool Permit$580.00$597.00
Lot Line Adjustment$2,666.00$2,746.00
1
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_B_ Engineering 2011
178
Changes indicated
CITY OF CUPERTINO
in strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
3% increase unless
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
otherwise noted.
Schedule B - Engineering
Engineering Copies
- Microfiche$23.00/sheet**$23.50/sheet **
- Improvement Plans$23.00/sheet**$23.50/sheet **
- Traffic Reports/Plans$23.00/sheet**$23.50/sheet **
- Microfilm$0.57/frame**$0.59/frame **
** Price is for first sheet only. Each additional sheet is $11.22 $11.56.
Transportation Permit (State Regulated Fee)
- Single$16.00
- Annual Utility Company$90.00
- Additional Engineering Investigation or Coordination$59.00/hr.
Telecommunications Facility Fee (5% increase per year)
$2.08 $2.18/lineal ft. of conduit/yr
- Installation Rate
$1.10 $1.16/lineal ft. of leased conduit/yr
- Occupancy Rate
Banners
- Large Banners Across Stevens Creek Boulevard$372.00$383.00
- Small Banners on Light Poles (for 20 poles)$732.00$754.00
Aerial Photo Custom Work
24" x 36"$59.00/sheet$61.00/sheet
8 1/2" x 11"$11.38/sheet$11.72/sheet
Soil/Geo Report Research$1,389.00$1,431.00
Schools - Traffic Request$1,426.00$1,469.00
Special Events$1,263.00$1,301.00
Block PartyNo Charge
Parades$1,069.00$1,101.00
Vacation of Public Street ROW/PUE$534.00$550.00
Small Traffic Calming Request$1,002.00$1,032.00
Rural/Semi-Rural Classification Application$696.00$717.00
Comprehensive Neighborhood Traffic Request$1,993.00$2,053.00
Certificate of Correction$152.00$157.00
Floodplan Evaluation$59.00$61.00
Permit Parking Study$1,017.00$1,048.00
Streamside Review$362.00$373.00
2
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_B_ Engineering 2011
179
Changes indicated
CITY OF CUPERTINO
in strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
3% increase unless
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
otherwise noted.
Schedule B - Engineering
Applications may be subject to an hourly fee of $130.00, for applicable staff time, for cost recovery.
This hourly rate applies to large projects that require a level of staff support greater than the scope of
work included in the regular fee schedule and will be based on the time required to process the entire
project. The applicant will be notified if this fee is applicable to their project.
3
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_B_ Engineering 2011
180
Changes indicated in
CITY OF CUPERTINO
strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
3% increase.
Fees Effective July 1,2011
Schedule C - Planning
DEFINITIONS
A. Major
Five thousand or more square feet commercial; 10,000 or more square feet office/residential; eight or more
residential units.
B. Minor
Less than 5,000 square feet commercial; less than 10,000 square feet office/residential; less than eight
residential units.
C. Appeal
A request from the project applicant or interested party to reverse or amend a decision made by staff or an
advisory body. An appointed public official serving on the board that made the decision subject to the appeal,
an appointed public official serving on a board that is directly affected by the decision and the City Council
members are exempted from the fee requirement.
D. Directors Application
An application that receives final approval by staff either via an advertised public hearing or non-hearing format.
The application may involve a pre-application meeting and/or Environmental Review committee review.
E. Temporary Sign Permit
A staff review of a temporary sign application that includes an evaluation of the sign request, the entry into the
temporary log and site review by Code Enforcement Officers. The permit fee is in addition to the submittal of
a deposit to guarantee removal of the sign upon expiration of the temporary permit.
F. Tentative Map: Five or more parcels.
G. Parcel Map: Four or less parcels.
H. Housing Mitigation Fee
Fee collected is used to construct new affordable residential units for Cupertino residents and employees. The
fees mitigate the need for affordable units caused by expanding offices, retail, hotel and industrial buildings
creating new jobs and new residential development creating a need for more affordable development.
An impact fee shall be assessed on any new retail, hotel and office/industrial development applications. The
following uses shall be exempt from the impact fee, but still required to provide Below Market Rate Housing as
part of a residential development: projects in a redevelopment project area and mixed use projects providing
two thirds residential and one third retail/office.
An in-lieu fee shall be assessed on all new residential units in developments of and on new single family lots
created through a subdivision. Existing single family lots are exempt.
Note: Mixed use applications will be classified based upon the highest intensity and review process. The Director
of Community Development will have discretion to classify projects based upon the above criteria.
181
Changes indicated in
CITY OF CUPERTINO
strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
3% increase.
Fees Effective July 1,2011
Schedule C - Planning
General Plan Amendment Authorization - Major$ 4,160.00$4,285.00
General Plan Amendment Authorization - Minor$ 2,079.00$2,141.00
Study Session$ 4,160.00$4,285.00
General Plan Amendment - Major$ 12,957.00$13,346.00
General Plan Amendment - Minor$ 6,479.00$6,673.00
Development Agreement$ 17,133.00$17,647.00
Zoning - Minor$ 3,209.00$3,305.00
Zoning < one acre$ 6,417.00$6,610.00
Zoning one to five acres$ 9,755.00$10,048.00
Zoning > five acres$ 13,291.00$13,690.00
Tentative Map (See Definition F)$ 14,140.00$14,564.00
Parcel Map (See Definition G)$ 6,604.00$6,802.00
Use Permit / Planned Development Permit - Major
$ 14,140.00$14,564.00
Use Permit / Planned Development Permit - Minor
$ 6,604.00$6,802.00
Amendment to Use Permit / Planned Development Permit - MajorNEW$7,282.00
Amendment to Use Permit / Planned Development Permit - MinorNEW$3,401.00
Architectural and Site Approval - Major
$ 6,604.00$6,802.00
Architectural and Site Approval - Minor$ 3,194.00$3,290.00
Planning Commission Interpretation$ 3,230.00$3,327.00
Exception$ 2,490.00$2,565.00
Hillside Exception$ 6,264.00$6,452.00
R-1 Design Review$ 2,217.00$2,284.00
R-1 Exception$ 2,490.00$2,565.00
Minor Residential Permit$ 1,115.00$1,148.00
Environmental Impact Report (Plus State & County Filing Fees)$ 24,738.00$25,480.00
Negative Declaration - Major (Plus State & County Filing Fees)$ 3,806.00$3,920.00
Negative Declaration - Minor (Plus State & County Filing Fees)$ 1,902.00$1,959.00
Categorical Exemption (Plus County Filing Fee)$ 220.00$227.00
Amendment to Development Approval$ 3,776.00
182
Changes indicated in
CITY OF CUPERTINO
strikethrough and bold.
Resolution 11-
3% increase.
Fees Effective July 1,2011
Schedule C - Planning
Sign Exception$ 1,867.00$1,923.00
Fence Exception$ 634.00$653.00
Director - Variance$ 1,594.00$1,642.00
Director - Minor Modification$ 1,115.00$1,148.00
Conditional Use Permit - Administrative NEW$3,401.00
Reasonable Accomodation NEW$500.00
Tree Removal Permit
First Tree$ 160.00$165.00
Each Additional Tree$ 81.00$83.00
Retroactive Tree Removal Permit$ 2,851.00$2,937.00
Tree Management Plan$ 1,115.00$1,148.00
Temporary Use Permit$ 1,274.00$1,312.00
Temporary Sign Permit (See Definition E)$ 186.00$192.00
Sign Program$ 639.00$658.00
Appeals (See Definition C)$ 162.00$167.00
Zoning, Planning, Municipal Code (Building Permit Fees)
Commercial/Multi-Family$0.25/sq.ft.$0.26/sq. ft.
Residential Single Family$0.13/sq. ft.$0.13/sq. ft.
Wireless Master Plan Fee: Equipment Mount on Existing Light Utility Pole$ 5.78$6.00
Wireless Master Plan Fee: Other Personal Wireless Facility$ 1,158.00$1,193.00
Housing Mitigation In-Lieu Fees (See Definition H)
Residential$2.67/sq. ft.$2.75/sq. ft.
Office/Industrial/Hotel/Retail/R&D$5.08/sq. ft.$5.23/sq. ft.
P(MP)$2.54/sq. ft.$2.62/sq. ft.
Zoning Verification Letter$ 168.00$173.00
Public Convenience and Necessity Letter (Alcoholic Beverage License)NEW$173.00
Applications may be subject to an hourly fee of $126.00 $130.00, for applicable staff time, for cost recovery.
This hourly rate applies to large projects that require a level of staff support greater than the scope of work
included in the regular fee schedule and will be based on the time required to process the entire project. The
applicant will be notified if this fee is applicable to their project.
183
$3.70$2.54$3.80$2.03$7.97$8.10$3.70$2.54$3.80$2.03$7.97$6.06$4.15$6.23$3.32$3.35$9.20$2.30$3.45$1.84$7.22$7.28$5.00$7.50$3.99$9.48
$10.16$14.76$40.49$10.10$15.17$31.79$10.16$16.59$13.04$20.00$15.70$17.28$47.39$11.86$17.77$37.21
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $4,908$5,057$5,565$5,819$6,959$7,975$4,892$5,039$5,546$5,798$6,937$7,948$4,908$5,057$5,565$5,819$6,959$7,975$4,013$4,134$4,549$4,757$5,691$6,520$2,222$2,289$2,519$2,634$3,151$3,613$4,829$4,975$5,47
5$5,725$6,850$7,847$4,581$4,719$5,193$5,430$6,496$7,443
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$4.62$3.17$4.76$2.53$9.97$4.62$3.17$4.76$2.53$9.97$7.57$5.19$7.79$4.15$4.18$2.86$4.32$2.31$9.03$9.11$6.25$9.37$4.99
$12.70$18.46$50.61$12.63$18.97$10.11$39.74$12.70$20.74$16.30$11.49$25.00$19.61$21.60$59.24$14.82$22.21$11.85$46.51
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,135$6,321$6,955$7,273$8,700$9,968$6,115$6,299$6,931$7,248$8,670$9,935$6,135$6,321$6,955$7,273$8,700$9,968$5,017$5,168$5,686$5,946$7,114$8,151$2,778$2,862$3,149$3,292$3,939$4,515$6,037$6,219$6,844$
7,156$8,562$9,808$5,726$5,899$6,492$6,787$8,120$9,304
@
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$5.55$3.81$5.71$3.05$5.55$3.81$5.71$3.05$9.08$6.23$9.34$4.97$5.02$3.44$5.18$2.76$7.50$5.98
$15.23$11.96$22.15$60.73$15.16$22.76$12.13$47.69$15.23$11.96$24.90$19.56$13.79$10.84$10.92$29.99$11.25$23.54$25.93$71.08$17.78$26.65$14.21$55.83
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$7,363$7,584$8,347$8,728$7,337$7,559$8,318$8,697$7,363$7,584$8,347$8,728$6,019$6,201$6,823$7,135$8,536$9,780$3,334$3,435$3,779$3,951$4,727$5,418$7,244$7,463$8,213$8,588$6,871$7,079$7,789$8,145$9,743
@
$10,440$11,962$10,405$11,922$10,440$11,962$10,275$11,769$11,166
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$3.59$9.86$2.47$3.69$1.97$7.74$9.81$7.86$3.59$9.86$2.47$3.69$1.97$7.74$5.88$4.03$6.05$3.22$3.25$8.93$2.23$3.35$1.79$7.01$7.07$4.85$7.28$3.87$9.20
$14.33$39.31$14.73$30.86$16.11$12.66$19.42$15.24$16.78$46.01$11.51$17.25$36.13
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$4,765$4,909$5,402$5,649$6,756$7,742$4,749$4,892$5,384$5,629$6,734$7,716$4,765$4,909$5,402$5,649$6,756$7,742$3,896$4,013$4,416$4,618$5,525$6,330$2,157$2,222$2,445$2,557$3,059$3,507$4,688$4,830$5,315$
5,558$6,650$7,618$4,447$4,581$5,041$5,271$6,306$7,226
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$4.49$3.08$4.62$2.46$9.68$9.82$4.49$3.08$4.62$2.46$9.68$7.35$5.04$7.56$4.03$4.06$2.78$4.19$2.24$8.77$8.84$6.07$9.10$4.84
184
$12.33$17.92$49.14$12.26$18.42$38.58$12.33$20.14$15.83$11.16$24.27$19.04$20.97$57.51$14.39$21.56$11.50$45.16
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$5,956$6,136$6,752$7,061$8,446$9,677$5,936$6,115$6,729$7,036$8,417$9,645$5,956$6,136$6,752$7,061$8,446$9,677$4,870$5,017$5,520$5,772$6,906$7,913$2,697$2,778$3,057$3,196$3,824$4,383$5,861$6,037$6,644$
6,947$8,312$9,522$5,559$5,727$6,302$6,589$7,883$9,033
@
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$5.39$3.70$5.54$2.96$5.39$3.70$5.54$2.96$8.82$6.05$9.07$4.83$4.87$3.34$5.03$2.68$7.28$5.81
$14.79$11.61$21.50$58.96$14.72$22.10$11.78$46.30$14.79$11.61$24.17$18.99$13.39$10.52$10.60$29.12$10.92$22.85$25.17$69.01$17.26$25.87$13.80$54.20
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$7,148$7,363$8,103$8,473$7,123$7,338$8,075$8,443$7,148$7,363$8,103$8,473$5,843$6,020$6,624$6,927$8,287$9,495$3,236$3,334$3,668$3,835$4,589$5,260$7,033$7,245$7,973$8,337$9,975$6,670$6,872$7,562$7,907$
9,459
@
$10,135$11,613$10,101$11,574$10,135$11,613$11,426$10,840
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
250 500 500 500 200
1,000 5,000 1,250 2,500 5,000 1,000 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,0004,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 20,000 50,000 12,500 25,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,00020,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 100,000
Threshold
Project Size
--------------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
A Occupancy
Tenant Improvements
Banks
Laundromat
----------------------------
IBC
Class
A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4, A-5 A B
B
$8.63$5.92$8.88$4.74$4.11$2.82$4.22$2.26$8.86$4.80$3.30$4.94$2.64$4.58$3.13$4.72$2.51$9.87$3.36$9.23$2.30$3.47$1.83$7.24
$23.67$18.59$11.29$13.18$10.35$37.68$25.84$38.75$20.67$81.16$22.67$62.18$15.54$23.32$12.44$48.83$12.57
$103.35
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $5,721$5,893$6,485$6,782$8,113$9,296$5,451$5,616$6,180$6,463$7,730$8,860$1,912$1,970$2,168$2,266$2,711$3,107$4,995$5,146$5,663$5,921$7,084$8,117$3,006$3,097$3,407$3,562$4,262$4,884$6,073$6,257$6,88
5$7,198$8,614$9,872$4,456$4,591$5,053$5,281$6,323$7,239
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.41$5.91$5.14$3.53$5.27$2.82$6.00$4.12$6.18$3.30$5.73$3.91$5.90$3.14$4.20$2.86$4.34$2.30$9.04
$10.79$29.58$11.09$23.24$14.11$11.07$16.48$12.95$47.10$32.30$48.44$25.84$28.34$77.72$19.43$29.14$15.55$61.05$15.71$12.34$11.54
$129.19$101.47
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,151$7,367$8,107$8,477$6,814$7,020$7,725$8,079$9,662$2,390$2,462$2,709$2,833$3,389$3,884$6,244$6,433$7,079$7,401$8,854$3,757$3,870$4,259$4,453$5,328$6,105$7,592$7,820$8,606$8,998$5,571$5,739$6,315$
6,602$7,903$9,049
@
Size$10,141$11,621$11,074$10,147$10,768$12,340
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$8.89$7.10$6.17$4.23$6.33$3.39$7.21$4.94$7.41$3.96$6.88$4.70$7.08$3.77$5.04$3.44$5.20$2.75
$12.96$35.50$13.32$27.89$16.93$13.29$19.78$15.53$56.52$38.76$58.12$31.00$34.00$93.28$23.32$34.97$18.66$73.25$18.85$14.81$13.84$10.86
$155.03$121.76
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$8,581$8,840$9,728$8,177$8,424$9,270$9,694$2,868$2,955$3,251$3,399$4,067$4,660$7,493$7,719$8,494$8,882$4,508$4,644$5,110$5,344$6,393$7,326$9,110$9,385$6,684$6,886$7,578$7,922$9,483
@
$10,172$12,170$13,945$11,594$13,289$10,626$12,176$10,327$10,797$12,921$14,808$10,858
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$8.38$5.75$8.62$4.60$3.99$2.74$4.10$2.19$8.60$4.66$3.20$4.80$2.56$4.45$3.04$4.58$2.44$9.58$3.26$8.96$2.23$3.37$1.78$7.03
$22.98$18.05$10.96$12.80$10.05$36.58$25.09$37.62$20.07$78.80$22.01$60.37$15.09$22.64$12.08$47.41$12.20
$100.34
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$5,554$5,721$6,296$6,584$7,876$9,025$5,292$5,452$6,000$6,274$7,504$8,601$1,856$1,912$2,104$2,200$2,632$3,016$4,849$4,996$5,498$5,748$6,877$7,880$2,918$3,006$3,307$3,458$4,137$4,741$5,896$6,074$6,684$
6,988$8,363$9,584$4,326$4,457$4,905$5,127$6,138$7,028
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.19$5.74$4.99$3.43$5.12$2.74$5.83$4.00$6.00$3.20$5.56$3.80$5.73$3.05$4.08$2.78$4.21$2.23$8.78
185
$10.48$28.72$10.77$22.56$13.70$10.75$16.00$12.57$45.73$31.36$47.03$25.09$98.51$27.51$75.46$18.86$28.29$15.10$59.27$15.25$11.98$11.20
$125.43
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,942$7,152$7,870$8,230$9,845$6,615$6,815$7,500$7,843$9,380$2,320$2,390$2,630$2,750$3,290$3,770$6,062$6,245$6,872$7,185$8,596$9,851$3,647$3,757$4,134$4,323$5,172$5,927$7,370$7,592$8,355$8,735$5,408$
5,571$6,131$6,409$7,672$8,785
@
$11,282$10,751$10,454$11,980
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$8.63$6.89$5.99$4.11$6.15$3.29$7.00$4.80$7.19$3.84$6.68$4.56$6.87$3.66$4.89$3.34$5.05$2.67
$12.58$34.47$12.93$27.08$16.44$12.90$19.20$15.08$54.87$37.63$56.43$30.10$33.01$90.56$22.64$33.95$18.12$71.12$18.30$14.38$13.44$10.54
$150.51$118.21
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$8,331$8,582$9,444$9,875$7,938$8,178$9,000$9,411$2,784$2,868$3,156$3,300$3,948$4,524$7,274$7,494$8,246$8,623$4,376$4,508$4,961$5,188$6,206$7,112$8,844$9,111$6,489$6,685$7,357$7,691$9,206
@
$11,815$13,538$11,256$12,901$10,316$11,821$10,026$10,482$12,544$14,376$10,541
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
500 300 100 500 100 500
2,500 5,000 1,000 5,000 1,500 3,000 6,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 5,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 15,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,00020,000 50,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 100,000 100,000
Threshold
Project Size
----------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Medical Office
Offices
B Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Preschool/School
E Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Factory/Industrial
F Occupancy Tenant Improvements
----------------------------
IBC
Class
B B B E E F-1, F-2 F
$6.76$4.64$6.95$3.70$1.67$4.55$1.15$1.70$0.92$3.58$6.59$4.53$6.79$3.63
$39.41$27.01$40.53$21.62$84.88$31.43$86.19$21.55$32.32$17.24$67.69$29.55$81.04$20.28$30.40$16.20$63.65$18.52$14.55$20.64$56.60$14.15$21.22$11.32$44.45$18.09$14.21
$108.08
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $5,224$5,381$5,921$6,192$7,407$8,489$4,167$4,293$4,723$4,938$5,908$6,770$3,918$4,036$4,441$4,644$5,555$6,366$4,477$4,612$5,075$5,307$6,349$7,275$2,736$2,819$3,102$3,243$3,879$4,446$4,411$4,545$5,00
0$5,230$6,252$7,164$2,624$2,703$2,974$3,111$3,721$4,266
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$8.45$5.79$8.69$4.62$2.08$5.70$1.44$2.13$1.14$4.48$5.67$8.49$4.53
$49.25$33.75$50.67$27.03$39.28$26.93$40.40$21.55$84.61$36.95$25.35$38.00$20.26$79.57$23.15$18.19$25.79$70.75$17.69$26.52$14.14$55.56$22.62$17.77
$135.09$106.10$107.74$101.30$824.00
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,530$6,726$7,402$7,739$9,259$5,208$5,365$5,903$6,173$7,385$8,462$4,897$5,044$5,551$5,805$6,945$7,957$5,596$5,765$6,344$6,634$7,938$9,094$3,420$3,523$3,876$4,054$4,850$5,556$5,514$5,680$6,250$6,538$
7,815$8,955$3,280$3,379$3,718$3,888$4,652$5,332
@
Size$10,611
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$6.94$5.55$2.50$6.83$1.73$2.55$1.37$5.38$9.89$6.80$5.44
$59.10$40.50$60.80$32.42$47.14$32.32$48.48$25.85$44.33$30.42$45.60$24.31$95.48$10.14$27.79$10.43$21.83$30.95$84.90$21.22$31.84$16.97$66.67$27.14$10.18$21.32
$162.11$127.32$129.29$101.54$121.56
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$7,835$8,072$8,882$9,287$6,250$6,438$7,084$7,407$8,862$5,877$6,054$6,662$6,965$8,333$9,549$6,715$6,918$7,613$7,960$9,525$4,104$4,228$4,652$4,864$5,819$6,668$6,616$6,816$7,500$7,845$9,378$3,936$4,055$
4,461$4,665$5,582$6,398
@
$11,111$12,732$10,154$10,912$10,746
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$6.56$4.50$6.75$3.59$1.62$4.42$1.12$1.65$0.89$3.48$6.40$4.40$6.59$3.52
$38.26$26.22$39.35$20.99$82.41$30.51$83.68$20.92$31.38$16.74$65.72$28.69$78.68$19.69$29.51$15.73$61.80$17.98$14.13$20.04$54.95$13.74$20.60$10.99$43.16$17.56$13.80
$104.93
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$5,071$5,224$5,748$6,011$7,191$8,241$4,045$4,167$4,585$4,794$5,735$6,572$3,803$3,918$4,311$4,508$5,393$6,180$4,346$4,477$4,927$5,152$6,164$7,063$2,656$2,736$3,011$3,148$3,766$4,316$4,282$4,412$4,854$
5,077$6,069$6,955$2,547$2,624$2,887$3,020$3,612$4,141
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$8.20$5.62$8.44$4.49$2.02$5.53$1.40$2.07$1.11$4.35$5.50$8.24$4.40
186
$47.82$32.77$49.19$26.24$38.14$26.15$39.22$20.92$82.15$35.87$98.35$24.61$36.89$19.67$77.25$22.48$17.66$25.04$68.69$17.17$25.75$13.73$53.94$21.96$17.25
$131.16$103.01$104.60$800.00
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,339$6,530$7,186$7,513$8,989$5,056$5,208$5,731$5,993$7,169$8,215$4,754$4,897$5,389$5,635$6,742$7,725$5,433$5,597$6,159$6,440$7,706$8,829$3,320$3,420$3,763$3,935$4,708$5,394$5,353$5,514$6,067$6,347$
7,587$8,694$3,184$3,280$3,609$3,774$4,516$5,176
@
$10,301
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$9.84$6.74$5.39$2.43$6.63$1.68$2.48$1.33$5.22$9.60$6.60$9.88$5.28
$57.38$39.32$59.03$31.48$45.77$31.38$47.07$25.10$98.58$43.04$29.53$44.27$23.60$92.70$26.98$10.13$21.19$30.05$82.43$20.60$30.91$16.48$64.73$26.35$20.70
$157.39$123.61$125.52$118.02
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$7,606$7,836$8,623$9,016$6,067$6,250$6,877$7,191$8,603$9,858$5,705$5,877$6,467$6,762$8,090$9,270$6,519$6,716$7,391$7,728$9,247$3,984$4,104$4,516$4,722$5,649$6,473$6,423$6,617$7,281$7,616$9,104$3,821$
3,936$4,331$4,529$5,419$6,211
@
$10,787$12,361$10,594$10,433
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
100 500 100 500 100 500 500 100 500 300
1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 2,000 1,500 3,0006,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 15,00030,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 200,000
Threshold
Project Size
----------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
H-1 Occupancies
Hazardous Rooms
H Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Institutional
I Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Market
M Occupancy Tenant Improvements
---------------------------
IBC
Class
H-1 H-2 toH-5 H I-1 to I-4 I M
M
$4.88$3.35$5.01$2.68$2.48$6.82$1.71$2.55$1.36$5.36$1.94$5.30$1.32$1.99$1.07$4.17$7.05$0.93$0.94$0.71$7.06
$13.37$10.51$18.81$18.79$49.35$21.18$45.35$22.55$18.91$37.58$37.58$14.10$98.68$42.30$83.87
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $5,173$5,330$5,864$6,133$7,335$8,406$2,636$2,717$2,989$3,126$3,739$4,285$7,695$7,926$8,723$9,119$2,420$2,702$2,984$3,126$4,112$4,536$1,257$1,272$1,285$1,299$1,750$1,892$4,159$4,723$5,286$5,569$7,54
2$8,388
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B$10,912$12,512
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$6.10$4.19$6.26$3.35$3.11$8.52$2.13$3.20$1.71$6.70$2.42$6.63$1.65$2.49$1.33$5.21$8.81$1.16$1.17$0.90$8.82
$16.72$13.13$23.50$23.48$61.69$26.46$56.69$28.18$23.64$46.99$46.99$17.63$52.88
$123.35$104.84
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,467$6,663$7,331$7,666$9,169$3,295$3,395$3,736$3,906$4,674$5,356$9,619$9,908$3,026$3,378$3,730$3,906$5,140$5,670$1,571$1,589$1,606$1,625$2,188$2,364$5,198$5,903$6,608$6,960$9,428
@
Size$10,508$10,903$11,398$13,641$15,639$10,485
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.32$5.03$7.51$4.02$3.73$2.55$3.84$2.05$8.03$2.90$7.96$1.99$2.99$1.60$6.25$1.40$1.41$1.07
$20.05$15.76$10.22$28.21$28.18$10.57$74.03$31.75$68.02$33.83$10.59$28.37$56.38$56.38$21.16$63.45
$148.02$125.81
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
SEE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE
I-A, I-B
$7,761$7,994$8,797$9,198$3,955$4,074$4,483$4,688$5,609$6,428$3,630$4,054$4,476$4,687$6,168$6,803$1,885$1,907$1,928$1,949$2,626$2,837$6,238$7,084$7,929$8,353
@
$11,002$12,609$11,542$11,890$13,084$13,678$16,368$18,767$11,313$12,582
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$4.74$3.25$4.86$2.60$2.41$6.62$1.66$2.48$1.32$5.20$1.88$5.15$1.28$1.93$1.04$4.05$6.84$0.90$0.91$0.69$6.85
$12.98$10.20$18.26$18.24$47.91$20.56$44.03$21.89$18.36$36.49$36.49$13.69$95.81$41.07$81.43
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$5,022$5,174$5,693$5,954$7,121$8,161$2,559$2,637$2,901$3,034$3,630$4,160$7,470$7,695$8,468$8,853$2,349$2,623$2,897$3,034$3,992$4,403$1,220$1,234$1,247$1,261$1,699$1,836$4,037$4,585$5,132$5,406$7,322$
8,143
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$10,594$12,147
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$5.92$4.07$6.08$3.25$3.02$8.27$2.07$3.11$1.66$6.50$2.35$6.44$1.60$2.42$1.29$5.06$8.55$1.13$1.14$0.87$8.56
187
$16.23$12.75$22.82$22.80$59.89$25.69$55.04$27.36$22.95$45.62$45.62$17.12$51.34
$119.76$101.79
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,278$6,468$7,117$7,442$8,901$3,199$3,296$3,627$3,792$4,537$5,200$9,338$9,619$2,937$3,279$3,621$3,792$4,990$5,504$1,525$1,542$1,559$1,577$2,124$2,295$5,046$5,731$6,415$6,757$9,153
@
$10,201$10,585$11,066$13,243$15,183$10,179
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.11$4.88$7.29$3.90$3.62$9.92$2.48$3.73$1.99$7.80$2.82$7.73$1.93$2.90$1.55$6.07$1.36$1.37$1.04
$19.47$15.30$27.39$27.36$10.26$71.87$30.83$66.04$32.84$10.28$27.54$54.74$54.74$20.54$61.60
$143.71$122.15
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
SEE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE
Additional
I-A, I-B
$7,534$7,761$8,540$8,930$3,839$3,955$4,352$4,551$5,445$6,240$3,524$3,935$4,345$4,550$5,988$6,604$1,830$1,851$1,871$1,892$2,549$2,754$6,056$6,877$7,698$8,109
@
$10,681$12,241$11,205$11,543$12,702$13,279$15,891$18,220$10,983$12,215
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
800 800 499
4,000 8,000 4,000 8,000 3,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
16,000 40,000 80,000 16,000 40,000 80,000 15,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
150,000 300,000
Threshold
Project Size
---------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Apartment Bldg
Apartment Bldg - Repeat Unit
Hotels & Motels
Dwellings - Custom,
Models, First Master Plan
Dwellings - Production Phaseof Master Plan(repeats)
------------------------
IBC
Class
R-2 R-2 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-3
$9.40$7.07$4.70$3.52$6.70$4.59$6.88$3.67$7.35$5.04$7.57$4.03
$37.58$42.29$49.34$71.89$20.02$21.79$25.86$39.59$18.80$75.20$14.08$84.61$98.66$18.34$14.41$45.03$30.87$46.32$24.70$97.01$24.38$66.91$16.72$25.08$13.39$52.54$20.15$15.83
$138.62$123.52
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $4,511$4,652$5,216$5,358$6,203$7,190$2,565$2,636$2,936$3,007$3,443$3,960$8,505$8,787$9,915$8,872$9,140$5,969$6,150$6,768$7,077$8,466$9,701$2,587$2,665$2,933$3,067$3,668$4,204$5,845$6,021$6,625$6,92
7$8,290$9,499
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B$10,196$11,889$13,862$10,056$10,516$12,580$14,413
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$8.84$5.87$4.40$8.36$5.75$8.60$4.58$9.19$6.29$9.47$5.04
$11.75$46.99$52.86$61.67$89.87$25.03$27.23$32.33$49.49$23.49$94.01$17.60$22.94$18.01$56.29$38.59$57.90$30.87$30.48$83.64$20.90$31.35$16.74$65.68$25.18$19.79
$105.76$123.33$173.28$154.40$121.25
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$5,639$5,815$6,520$6,697$7,754$8,987$3,207$3,294$3,670$3,758$4,303$4,950$7,462$7,687$8,459$8,845$3,234$3,332$3,665$3,833$4,585$5,255$7,306$7,527$8,282$8,660
@
Size$10,631$10,983$12,393$12,746$14,861$17,328$11,089$11,424$12,571$13,145$15,724$18,017$10,582$12,126$10,362$11,873
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.05$5.27$6.89$5.50$7.55$6.05
$14.10$56.38$10.60$63.44$74.01$30.03$32.68$38.79$59.39$28.19$21.13$10.04$27.52$10.32$21.62$67.55$46.31$69.48$37.05$36.58$25.07$37.63$20.09$78.82$11.02$30.22$11.35$23.74
$107.84$112.81$126.92$147.99$207.93$185.28$145.51$100.35
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$6,767$6,978$7,823$8,036$9,304$3,849$3,954$4,405$4,510$5,164$5,939$8,954$9,224$3,881$3,997$4,399$4,599$5,503$6,306$8,767$9,032$9,938
@
$10,785$12,758$13,180$14,873$15,295$17,833$20,793$13,307$13,709$15,085$15,774$18,870$21,620$10,151$10,614$12,698$14,551$10,391$12,435$14,248
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$9.13$6.86$4.56$3.42$6.50$4.46$6.68$3.56$7.14$4.89$7.35$3.91
$36.49$41.06$47.90$69.80$19.44$21.16$25.11$38.44$18.25$73.01$13.67$82.15$95.79$17.81$13.99$43.72$29.97$44.97$23.98$94.18$23.67$64.96$16.23$24.35$13.00$51.01$19.56$15.37
$134.58$119.92
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$4,379$4,516$5,064$5,201$6,022$6,980$2,490$2,559$2,850$2,919$3,342$3,844$8,257$8,531$9,626$9,899$8,613$8,873$9,763$5,795$5,970$6,570$6,870$8,219$9,418$2,511$2,587$2,847$2,977$3,561$4,081$5,674$5,845$
6,432$6,725$8,048$9,222
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$11,542$13,458$10,209$12,213$13,993
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$8.58$5.70$4.27$8.12$5.58$8.35$4.45$8.92$6.11$9.19$4.89
188
$11.41$45.62$51.32$59.87$87.25$24.30$26.44$31.39$48.05$22.81$91.27$17.09$22.27$17.49$54.65$37.47$56.21$29.97$29.59$81.20$20.29$30.44$16.25$63.77$24.45$19.21
$102.68$119.74$168.23$149.90$117.72
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$5,474$5,645$6,330$6,501$7,528$8,725$3,113$3,198$3,563$3,648$4,177$4,805$7,244$7,463$8,212$8,587$3,139$3,234$3,558$3,721$4,451$5,101$7,093$7,307$8,040$8,407
@
$10,321$10,663$12,032$12,374$14,428$16,823$10,766$11,091$12,204$12,762$15,266$17,492$10,273$11,772$10,060$11,527
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$6.84$5.12$9.75$6.69$5.34$7.33$5.87
$13.69$54.74$10.29$61.59$71.85$29.16$31.73$37.66$57.66$27.37$20.51$26.72$10.02$20.99$65.58$44.96$67.46$35.97$35.51$97.43$24.34$36.53$19.50$76.52$10.70$29.34$11.02$23.05
$104.70$109.52$123.22$143.68$201.87$179.88$141.27
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$6,569$6,774$7,595$7,801$9,033$3,736$3,838$4,276$4,378$5,013$5,766$8,693$8,955$9,855$3,767$3,880$4,270$4,465$5,342$6,122$8,511$8,768$9,648
@
$10,470$12,386$12,796$14,439$14,849$17,313$20,187$12,919$13,309$14,645$15,314$18,320$20,990$10,304$12,328$14,127$10,088$12,072$13,833
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
80
100 500 400 800 600
1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,600 4,000 8,000 3,000 6,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 12,000 30,00060,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000
Threshold
Project Size
-----------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
First Master Plan of
Master Plan(repeats)
Group Care
Group Care
R Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Moderate-Hazard Storage
---------------------------
IBC
Class
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3.1 R-4 R S-1
$0.55$1.49$0.37$0.57$0.30$1.17$4.46$3.06$4.59$2.43$9.60$3.11$8.54$2.13$3.19$1.72$6.71$4.39$5.63$8.63$5.92$8.88$4.74$1.65$4.51$1.13$1.69$0.91$3.54
$12.22$53.94$36.98$55.48$29.58$15.07$25.39$22.61$35.47$23.67$18.59
$147.95$116.18
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $7,214$7,431$8,177$8,551$3,545$3,652$4,019$4,202$5,028$5,757$2,861$2,946$3,243$3,390$4,057$4,648$4,125$4,249$4,677$4,890$5,848$6,706$2,183$2,249$2,475$2,588$3,096$3,548$5,721$5,893$6,485$6,782$8,11
3$9,296$6,550$6,748$7,425$7,766$9,286
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B$10,235$11,727$10,640
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$0.68$1.86$0.46$0.70$0.37$1.46$5.57$3.82$5.74$3.04$3.88$2.67$4.00$2.14$8.38$5.48$7.05$7.41$5.91$2.06$5.64$1.42$2.11$1.13$4.43
$15.27$11.99$67.42$46.23$69.35$36.98$10.67$18.83$31.73$28.25$44.33$10.79$29.58$11.09$23.24
$184.94$145.24
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$9,017$9,288$4,431$4,564$5,023$5,251$6,285$7,196$3,576$3,684$4,054$4,238$5,070$5,810$5,156$5,311$5,845$6,111$7,309$8,383$2,729$2,810$3,094$3,234$3,869$4,434$7,151$7,367$8,107$8,477$8,187$8,434$9,280$
9,706
@
Size$10,221$10,688$12,793$14,658$10,141$11,621$11,607$13,299
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$0.81$2.24$0.56$0.84$0.44$1.76$6.68$4.59$6.89$3.65$4.67$3.20$4.79$2.58$6.57$8.46$8.89$7.10$2.47$6.77$1.71$2.53$1.35$5.31
$18.32$14.39$80.92$55.48$83.22$44.37$12.81$10.06$22.60$38.09$33.91$53.20$12.96$35.50$13.32$27.89
$221.92$174.29
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$5,316$5,477$6,027$6,302$7,542$8,636$4,290$4,420$4,864$5,086$6,085$6,972$6,187$6,373$7,014$7,334$8,771$3,274$3,373$3,712$3,881$4,643$5,320$8,581$8,840$9,728$9,825
@
$10,820$11,146$12,266$12,825$15,352$17,591$10,058$10,172$12,170$13,945$10,121$11,137$11,648$13,928$15,959
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$0.53$1.45$0.36$0.55$0.29$1.14$4.33$2.97$4.46$2.36$9.32$3.02$8.29$2.07$3.10$1.67$6.51$4.26$5.47$8.38$5.75$8.62$4.60$1.60$4.38$1.10$1.64$0.88$3.44
$11.86$52.37$35.90$53.86$28.72$14.63$24.65$21.95$34.44$22.98$18.05
$143.64$112.80
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$7,003$7,214$7,938$8,301$9,936$3,441$3,545$3,901$4,079$4,881$5,589$2,777$2,860$3,148$3,291$3,938$4,512$4,004$4,125$4,540$4,747$5,677$6,510$2,119$2,183$2,402$2,512$3,005$3,444$5,554$5,721$6,296$6,584$
7,876$9,025$6,359$6,551$7,208$7,539$9,015
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$11,385$10,330
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$0.66$1.81$0.45$0.68$0.36$1.42$5.41$3.71$5.57$2.95$3.77$2.59$3.88$2.08$8.14$5.32$6.84$7.19$5.74$2.00$5.48$1.38$2.05$1.10$4.30
189
$14.83$11.64$65.46$44.88$67.33$35.90$10.36$18.28$30.81$27.43$43.04$10.48$28.72$10.77$22.56
$179.55$141.01
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$8,754$9,017$9,923$4,301$4,431$4,876$5,098$6,101$6,986$3,471$3,576$3,935$4,114$4,922$5,640$5,005$5,156$5,674$5,933$7,096$8,138$2,649$2,728$3,003$3,139$3,756$4,304$6,942$7,152$7,870$8,230$9,845$7,948$
8,188$9,009$9,423
@
$10,376$12,420$14,231$11,282$11,268$12,911
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$0.79$2.17$0.54$0.82$0.43$1.71$6.49$4.46$6.69$3.54$4.53$3.11$4.65$2.50$9.77$6.38$8.21$8.63$6.89$2.40$6.57$1.66$2.46$1.31$5.16
$17.79$13.97$78.56$53.86$80.80$43.08$12.44$21.94$36.98$32.92$51.65$12.58$34.47$12.93$27.08
$215.46$169.21
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$5,161$5,317$5,851$6,118$7,322$8,384$4,165$4,291$4,722$4,937$5,907$6,768$6,006$6,187$6,809$7,120$8,515$9,765$3,178$3,274$3,603$3,767$4,507$5,165$8,331$8,582$9,444$9,875$9,538$9,826
@
$10,504$10,821$11,908$12,451$14,904$17,078$11,815$13,538$10,812$11,308$13,522$15,494
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
40
600 200 400 800 500
3,000 6,000 2,000 4,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 2,500 5,000 3,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 50,000 12,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 15,000 30,000 60,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 200,000 500,000 100,000 150,000300,000
1,000,000
Threshold
Project Size
--------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Low-Hazard Storage
S Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Private Garage/Agricultural Bldg
Standard Comm. Foundationw/o Podium
Standard Comm. Foundationw/ Podium
--------------------------------
IBC
Class
S-2 S U
$7.73$6.18
$11.26$30.87$11.57$24.26
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $7,462$7,687$8,459$8,845
Size
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B$10,581$12,127
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$9.66$7.73
$14.08$38.59$14.46$30.31
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$9,327$9,609
@
Size$10,573$11,057$13,226$15,158
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$9.27
$16.89$46.31$11.60$17.36$36.38
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
@
$11,192$11,530$12,688$13,268$15,872$18,190
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$7.50$6.00
$10.93$29.97$11.23$23.55
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$7,244$7,463$8,212$8,587
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$10,272$11,773
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$9.38$7.50
190
$13.67$37.47$14.04$29.43
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$9,055$9,329
@
$10,265$10,734$12,840$14,716
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$9.00
$16.40$44.96$11.26$16.85$35.32
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
@
$10,866$11,194$12,318$12,881$15,409$17,660
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
500
2,500 5,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 25,000 50,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Threshold
Project Size
----
Schedule D - New Construction Plan Check Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
All Other Shell Buildings
Each additional 100 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold.
-----
*
IBC
Class
SHELL BUILDINGS
$48.11$56.52$57.68$26.29$17.20$28.39$62.07$40.60$67.02$48.11$56.52$57.68$26.29$17.20$28.39$60.17$70.70$72.15$32.88$21.52$35.50$37.70$44.28$45.20$20.60$13.46$22.24$70.79$83.17$84.89$38.69$25.31$41.77$
96.76$52.87$34.60$57.08
$113.63$133.48$136.23$113.67$116.03
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$815$863$540$556
@ $1,380$3,304$6,130$1,951$3,620$7,025$1,380$3,304$6,130$2,067$3,834$7,441$1,294$2,401$4,661$7,750$1,015$2,431$4,511$8,754$1,329$2,466$4,787$7,958
Size$11,898$19,782$28,383$11,681$16,757$11,898$19,782$28,383$12,373$17,753$11,117$14,557$20,885$11,418
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$60.14$70.65$72.10$32.86$21.51$35.47$77.59$50.76$83.78$60.14$70.65$72.10$32.86$21.51$35.47$75.22$88.37$90.19$41.10$26.89$44.38$47.12$55.35$56.49$25.75$16.83$27.79$88.49$48.36$31.63$52.21$66.08$43.24$
71.36
$142.03$166.85$170.29$103.97$106.11$120.95$142.09$145.03
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$676$694
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,725$4,130$7,663$1,018$2,439$4,524$8,781$1,725$4,130$7,663$1,079$2,583$4,792$9,301$1,619$3,002$5,826$9,689$1,268$3,039$5,638$1,662$3,082$5,983$9,948
@
$14,872$24,728$35,479$14,601$20,946$14,872$24,728$35,479$15,466$22,191$13,896$10,943$18,196$26,106$14,272
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$72.16$84.78$86.52$39.42$25.80$42.57$93.10$60.90$72.16$84.78$86.52$39.42$25.80$42.57$90.26$49.32$32.28$53.25$56.55$66.41$67.78$30.89$20.20$33.35$58.03$37.97$62.65$79.30$51.89$85.63
$170.43$200.22$204.34$100.54$106.05$108.22$106.19$124.76$127.34$145.14$170.51$174.04
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$811$833
$2,069$4,956$9,194$1,222$2,926$5,429$2,069$4,956$9,194$1,294$3,100$5,751$1,942$3,602$6,992$1,523$3,647$6,766$1,994$3,699$7,180
@
$17,846$29,673$42,575$10,537$17,521$25,134$17,846$29,673$42,575$11,162$18,559$26,628$11,626$16,675$13,132$21,835$31,326$11,937$17,126
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$46.71$54.87$56.00$25.52$16.70$27.56$60.26$39.42$65.07$46.71$54.87$56.00$25.52$16.70$27.56$58.42$68.64$70.05$31.92$20.89$34.47$36.60$42.99$43.88$20.00$13.07$21.59$68.73$80.75$82.42$37.56$24.57$40.55$
93.94$51.33$33.59$55.42
$110.32$129.59$132.26$110.36$112.65
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$791$837$524$985$539
$1,339$3,207$5,951$1,894$3,514$6,820$1,339$3,207$5,951$2,006$3,722$7,224$1,256$2,331$4,525$7,524$2,360$4,379$8,499$1,290$2,394$4,647$7,726
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$11,551$19,205$27,556$11,340$16,268$11,551$19,205$27,556$12,012$17,235$10,793$14,133$20,276$11,085
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
191
$58.39$68.59$70.00$31.90$20.88$34.44$75.33$49.28$81.34$58.39$68.59$70.00$31.90$20.88$34.44$73.03$85.80$87.56$39.90$26.11$43.09$45.75$53.74$54.84$25.00$16.34$26.98$85.91$46.95$30.71$50.69$64.16$41.98$
69.28
$137.89$161.99$165.33$100.94$103.02$117.43$137.95$140.81
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$988$656$673
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,674$4,009$7,439$2,367$4,392$8,525$1,674$4,009$7,439$1,047$2,507$4,652$9,030$1,571$2,914$5,656$9,406$1,231$2,950$5,473$1,613$2,992$5,808$9,658
@
$14,438$24,007$34,445$14,175$20,335$14,438$24,007$34,445$15,015$21,544$13,491$10,624$17,666$25,345$13,856
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$70.06$82.31$84.00$38.27$25.05$41.33$90.39$59.13$97.61$70.06$82.31$84.00$38.27$25.05$41.33$87.63$47.88$31.34$51.70$54.90$64.48$65.81$29.99$19.61$32.38$56.34$36.86$60.83$76.99$50.38$83.14
$165.47$194.39$198.39$102.96$105.07$103.10$121.13$123.63$140.91$165.54$168.97
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$787$808
$2,008$4,811$8,926$1,186$2,840$5,270$2,008$4,811$8,926$1,256$3,009$5,583$1,885$3,497$6,788$1,478$3,540$6,568$1,935$3,591$6,970
@
$17,326$28,808$41,334$10,230$17,010$24,401$17,326$28,808$41,334$10,836$18,018$25,852$11,287$16,189$12,749$21,199$30,413$11,589$16,627
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
250 500 500 500 200
1,000 5,000 1,250 2,500 5,000 1,000 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,000 4,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 20,000 50,000 12,500 25,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 20,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 100,000
Threshold
Project Size
--------------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
A Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Banks
Laundromat
----------------------------
IBC
Class
A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4, A-5 A B
B
$68.25$80.19$81.84$37.28$24.40$40.26$57.98$68.11$69.51$31.68$20.71$34.20$62.32$73.22$74.74$34.05$22.28$36.77$73.25$47.94$79.11$73.25$47.94$79.11$57.65$67.71$69.13$31.49$20.61$34.01$51.01$59.93$61.17$
27.86$18.24$30.10
$134.10$157.53$160.80$134.10$157.53$160.80
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$979$536$385$921$385$921
@ $2,344$4,348$8,440$1,663$3,981$7,388$1,284$2,383$4,625$7,690$1,709$3,317$5,515$7,912$1,709$3,317$5,515$7,912$1,653$3,959$7,344$1,463$3,502$6,499
Size$14,032$20,133$14,339$23,843$34,200$11,032$14,258$23,704$34,008$12,616$20,975$30,095
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$85.31$46.60$30.50$50.33$72.47$85.14$86.90$39.60$25.89$42.75$77.90$91.52$93.43$42.57$27.86$45.97$91.57$59.93$98.89$91.57$59.93$98.89$72.06$84.65$86.42$39.36$25.76$42.51$63.77$74.90$76.47$34.82$22.80$
37.62
$100.24$102.30$167.62$196.92$201.00$167.62$196.92$201.00
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$670$482$482
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,223$2,930$5,436$2,078$4,977$9,233$1,605$2,978$5,781$9,612$1,151$2,136$4,146$6,893$9,890$1,151$2,136$4,146$6,893$9,890$2,066$4,949$9,181$1,828$4,379$8,124
@
$10,551$17,540$25,165$17,924$29,804$42,750$13,790$17,823$29,631$42,510$15,770$26,219$37,619
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$55.92$36.61$60.40$86.97$47.52$31.08$51.29$93.48$51.08$33.43$55.16$71.91$71.91$86.47$47.24$30.91$51.01$76.52$89.89$91.75$41.80$27.36$45.14
$102.37$120.28$122.77$102.17$104.28$109.83$112.11$201.15$236.29$241.21$109.88$118.67$201.15$236.29$241.21$109.88$118.67$101.57$103.70
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$804$577$577
$1,468$3,515$6,522$2,493$5,972$1,926$3,574$6,937$1,382$2,563$4,975$8,271$1,382$2,563$4,975$8,271$2,480$5,937$2,193$5,255$9,748
@
$12,660$21,049$30,199$11,080$21,508$35,764$51,299$11,534$16,548$11,867$11,867$11,016$21,386$35,556$51,011$18,924$31,462$45,142
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$66.26$77.85$79.46$36.19$23.69$39.09$56.29$66.13$67.49$30.76$20.11$33.20$60.51$71.09$72.56$33.06$21.64$35.70$71.12$46.54$76.81$71.12$46.54$76.81$55.97$65.74$67.12$30.57$20.01$33.02$49.52$58.18$59.39$
27.05$17.71$29.22
$130.19$152.94$156.12$130.19$152.94$156.12
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$950$520$373$894$373$894
$2,275$4,221$8,194$1,614$3,865$7,172$1,246$2,313$4,490$7,465$1,659$3,220$5,354$7,681$1,659$3,220$5,354$7,681$1,604$3,843$7,130$1,420$3,400$6,309
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$13,623$19,546$13,921$23,148$33,203$10,711$13,842$23,013$33,017$12,248$20,364$29,218
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
192
$82.83$97.32$99.32$45.24$29.61$48.86$70.36$82.66$84.37$38.45$25.14$41.50$75.63$88.86$90.70$41.33$27.04$44.63$88.90$58.18$96.01$88.90$58.18$96.01$69.96$82.18$83.90$38.21$25.01$41.27$61.91$72.72$74.24$
33.81$22.14$36.52
$162.74$191.18$195.15$162.74$191.18$195.15
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$650$467$467
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,187$2,844$5,277$2,017$4,832$8,964$1,558$2,891$5,612$9,332$1,117$2,073$4,025$6,692$9,601$1,117$2,073$4,025$6,692$9,601$2,005$4,804$8,913$1,774$4,251$7,887
@
$10,243$17,029$24,432$17,401$28,935$41,504$13,388$17,303$28,767$41,271$15,310$25,455$36,523
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$99.39$54.29$35.54$58.64$84.44$99.19$46.14$30.17$49.80$90.76$49.59$32.45$53.55$69.82$69.82$83.95$98.61$45.86$30.01$49.52$74.29$87.27$89.08$40.58$26.56$43.83
$116.78$119.19$101.24$106.63$108.84$195.29$229.41$234.18$106.68$115.21$195.29$229.41$234.18$106.68$115.21$100.68
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$781$560$560
$1,425$3,412$6,332$2,420$5,798$1,870$3,469$6,734$1,341$2,488$4,830$8,030$1,341$2,488$4,830$8,030$2,407$5,764$2,129$5,101$9,464
@
$12,291$20,435$29,319$10,757$20,881$34,722$49,804$11,198$16,066$11,521$11,521$10,695$20,763$34,520$49,525$18,372$30,545$43,827
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
500 300 100 500 100 500
2,500 5,000 1,000 5,000 1,500 3,000 6,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 5,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 15,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 20,000 50,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 100,000 100,000
Threshold
Project Size
----------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Medical Office
Offices
B Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Preschool/School
E Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Factory/Industrial
F Occupancy Tenant Improvements
----------------------------
IBC
Class
B B B E E F-1, F-2 F
$73.25$47.94$79.11$73.25$47.94$79.11$73.25$47.94$79.11$44.33$52.09$53.16$24.22$15.85$26.15$58.61$38.36$63.29$35.45$41.64$42.51$19.37$12.67$20.91$60.90$71.55$73.03$33.27$21.77$35.93
$134.10$157.53$160.80$134.10$157.53$160.80$134.10$157.53$160.80$107.27$126.02$128.65
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$385$921$385$921$385$921$636$308$737$524
@ $1,709$3,317$5,515$7,912$1,709$3,317$5,515$7,912$1,709$3,317$5,515$7,912$1,523$2,825$5,482$9,115$1,367$2,654$4,412$6,330$2,033$4,869$9,034$1,255$2,328$4,519$7,514
Size$13,078$17,535$29,159$41,824$10,779
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$91.57$59.93$98.89$91.57$59.93$98.89$91.57$59.93$98.89$55.41$65.11$66.45$30.27$19.82$32.69$73.25$47.94$79.11$44.32$52.06$53.13$24.22$15.83$26.14$76.12$89.44$91.29$41.59$27.21$44.91
$167.62$196.92$201.00$167.62$196.92$201.00$167.62$196.92$201.00$134.10$157.53$160.80
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$482$482$482$795$385$921$655
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,151$2,136$4,146$6,893$9,890$1,151$2,136$4,146$6,893$9,890$1,151$2,136$4,146$6,893$9,890$1,903$3,530$6,853$1,709$3,317$5,515$7,912$2,542$6,087$1,569$2,910$5,649$9,392
@
$11,394$16,349$11,292$21,919$36,449$52,279$13,474
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$71.91$71.91$71.91$66.51$78.13$79.73$36.33$23.78$39.23$87.91$57.53$94.94$53.18$62.47$63.76$29.06$18.99$31.36$91.35$49.91$32.65$53.89
$201.15$236.29$241.21$109.88$118.67$201.15$236.29$241.21$109.88$118.67$201.15$236.29$241.21$109.88$118.67$160.92$189.04$192.96$107.33$109.55
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$577$577$577$953$462$786
$1,382$2,563$4,975$8,271$1,382$2,563$4,975$8,271$1,382$2,563$4,975$8,271$2,284$4,237$8,224$1,106$2,050$3,980$6,617$9,494$3,049$7,304$1,882$3,492$6,778
@
$11,867$11,867$11,867$13,673$19,618$13,550$26,303$43,738$62,736$11,270$16,168
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$71.12$46.54$76.81$71.12$46.54$76.81$71.12$46.54$76.81$43.04$50.57$51.61$23.51$15.39$25.39$56.90$37.24$61.45$34.42$40.43$41.27$18.81$12.30$20.30$59.12$69.47$70.90$32.30$21.14$34.88
$130.19$152.94$156.12$130.19$152.94$156.12$130.19$152.94$156.12$104.15$122.35$124.90
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$373$894$373$894$373$894$617$299$715$508
$1,659$3,220$5,354$7,681$1,659$3,220$5,354$7,681$1,659$3,220$5,354$7,681$1,478$2,742$5,322$8,849$1,327$2,576$4,283$6,145$1,973$4,727$8,770$1,218$2,260$4,387$7,294
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$12,697$17,024$28,309$40,605$10,464
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
193
$88.90$58.18$96.01$88.90$58.18$96.01$88.90$58.18$96.01$53.80$63.21$64.51$29.39$19.24$31.74$71.12$46.54$76.81$43.03$50.54$51.58$23.51$15.37$25.38$73.91$86.83$88.63$40.38$26.42$43.60
$162.74$191.18$195.15$162.74$191.18$195.15$162.74$191.18$195.15$130.19$152.94$156.12
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$467$467$467$771$373$894$636
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,117$2,073$4,025$6,692$9,601$1,117$2,073$4,025$6,692$9,601$1,117$2,073$4,025$6,692$9,601$1,847$3,427$6,653$1,659$3,220$5,354$7,681$2,467$5,909$1,522$2,825$5,484$9,118
@
$11,062$15,872$10,963$21,280$35,387$50,756$13,081
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$69.82$69.82$69.82$64.57$75.85$77.41$35.27$23.09$38.09$85.35$55.85$92.17$51.63$60.65$61.90$28.21$18.44$30.45$88.69$48.45$31.70$52.32
$195.29$229.41$234.18$106.68$115.21$195.29$229.41$234.18$106.68$115.21$195.29$229.41$234.18$106.68$115.21$156.23$183.53$187.34$104.20$106.35
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$560$560$560$925$448$763
$1,341$2,488$4,830$8,030$1,341$2,488$4,830$8,030$1,341$2,488$4,830$8,030$2,217$4,113$7,984$1,073$1,990$3,864$6,424$9,217$2,960$7,091$1,827$3,390$6,581
@
$11,521$11,521$11,521$13,274$19,046$13,155$25,536$42,464$60,908$10,941$15,697
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
100 500 100 500 100 500 500 100 500 300
1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 2,000 1,500 3,000 6,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 15,000 30,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 200,000
Threshold
Project Size
----------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
H-1 Occupancies
Hazardous Rooms
H Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Institutional
I Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Market
M Occupancy Tenant Improvements
---------------------------
IBC
Class
H-1 H-2 toH-5 H I-1 to I-4 I M
M
$42.64$50.08$51.13$23.29$15.24$25.15$42.64$50.08$51.13$23.29$15.24$25.15$38.07$44.70$45.64$20.80$13.61$22.45$67.38$43.42$55.55$55.27$76.57$69.28$67.38$43.42$55.55$55.27$76.57$69.28$67.38$43.42$55.55$
55.27$76.57$69.28
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$978$978
@ $2,343$4,346$8,436$2,343$4,346$8,436$3,274$7,842$1,519$2,529$3,181$4,291$5,398$6,928$1,519$2,529$3,181$4,291$5,398$6,928$1,519$2,529$3,181$4,291$5,398$6,928
Size$14,025$20,121$14,025$20,121$14,548$28,241$46,962$67,367
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$53.30$62.60$63.91$29.11$19.06$31.44$53.30$62.60$63.91$29.11$19.06$31.44$47.59$55.88$57.05$26.00$17.01$28.07$84.23$54.27$69.44$69.09$95.72$86.60$84.23$54.27$69.44$69.09$95.72$86.60$84.23$54.27$69.44$
69.09$95.72$86.60
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,223$2,929$5,433$1,223$2,929$5,433$4,093$9,803$1,898$3,162$3,976$5,365$6,746$8,661$1,898$3,162$3,976$5,365$6,746$8,661$1,898$3,162$3,976$5,365$6,746$8,661
@
$10,545$17,531$25,151$10,545$17,531$25,151$18,185$35,302$58,702$84,208
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$63.96$75.12$76.69$34.93$22.86$37.73$63.96$75.12$76.69$34.93$22.86$37.73$57.10$67.06$68.46$31.20$20.40$33.68$65.13$83.33$82.92$65.13$83.33$82.92$65.13$83.33$82.92
$101.07$114.87$103.93$101.07$114.87$103.93$101.07$114.87$103.93
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
SEE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE
I-A, I-B
$1,467$3,514$6,518$1,467$3,514$6,518$4,911$2,278$3,794$4,770$6,437$8,095$2,278$3,794$4,770$6,437$8,095$2,278$3,794$4,770$6,437$8,095
@
$12,654$21,036$30,181$12,654$21,036$30,181$11,763$21,822$42,362$70,443$10,393$10,393$10,393
Size
$101,050
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$41.40$48.62$49.64$22.61$14.80$24.42$41.40$48.62$49.64$22.61$14.80$24.42$36.96$43.40$44.31$20.19$13.21$21.80$65.42$42.16$53.93$53.66$74.34$67.26$65.42$42.16$53.93$53.66$74.34$67.26$65.42$42.16$53.93$
53.66$74.34$67.26
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$949$949
$2,274$4,219$8,190$2,274$4,219$8,190$3,178$7,613$1,474$2,455$3,088$4,166$5,240$6,726$1,474$2,455$3,088$4,166$5,240$6,726$1,474$2,455$3,088$4,166$5,240$6,726
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$13,616$19,534$13,616$19,534$14,124$27,418$45,594$65,404
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
194
$51.75$60.78$62.05$28.26$18.50$30.52$51.75$60.78$62.05$28.26$18.50$30.52$46.20$54.25$55.39$25.24$16.51$27.25$81.78$52.69$67.42$67.08$92.93$84.08$81.78$52.69$67.42$67.08$92.93$84.08$81.78$52.69$67.42$
67.08$92.93$84.08
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,187$2,843$5,274$1,187$2,843$5,274$3,973$9,517$1,842$3,069$3,860$5,208$6,549$8,408$1,842$3,069$3,860$5,208$6,549$8,408$1,842$3,069$3,860$5,208$6,549$8,408
@
$10,237$17,020$24,418$10,237$17,020$24,418$17,655$34,273$56,992$81,755
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$62.10$72.93$74.46$33.91$22.19$36.63$62.10$72.93$74.46$33.91$22.19$36.63$55.44$65.11$66.47$30.29$19.81$32.70$98.13$63.23$80.90$80.50$98.13$63.23$80.90$80.50$98.13$63.23$80.90$80.50
$111.52$100.90$111.52$100.90$111.52$100.90
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
SEE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE
I-A, I-B
$1,424$3,411$6,328$1,424$3,411$6,328$4,767$2,211$3,683$4,631$6,249$7,859$2,211$3,683$4,631$6,249$7,859$2,211$3,683$4,631$6,249$7,859
@
$12,285$20,423$29,301$12,285$20,423$29,301$11,420$21,186$41,128$68,391$98,106$10,090$10,090$10,090
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
800 800 499
4,000 8,000 4,000 8,000 3,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
16,000 40,000 80,000 16,000 40,000 80,000 15,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
150,000 300,000
Threshold
Project Size
---------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Apartment Bldg
Apartment Bldg - Repeat Unit
Hotels & Motels
Dwellings - Custom, Models, First
Master Plan Dwellings -
Production Phaseof Master Plan(repeats)
------------------------
IBC
Class
R-2 R-2 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-3
$67.39$43.42$55.54$55.26$76.61$71.40$67.39$43.42$55.54$55.26$76.61$71.40$67.39$43.42$55.54$55.26$76.61$71.40$63.23$74.28$75.83$34.54$22.60$37.30$55.95$36.61$60.42$69.44$45.44$74.99$56.47$66.34$67.70$
30.85$20.19$33.31
$102.41$120.31$122.80$127.13$149.35$152.44
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$294$704$292$699$972
@ $1,731$2,741$3,392$4,504$5,609$7,140$1,731$2,741$3,392$4,504$5,609$7,140$1,731$2,741$3,392$4,504$5,609$7,140$1,813$4,343$8,056$1,306$2,533$4,212$6,042$1,296$2,516$4,182$6,000$2,327$4,317$8,380
Size$15,639$26,002$37,302$13,931$19,989
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$84.23$54.28$69.42$69.08$95.76$89.26$84.23$54.28$69.42$69.08$95.76$89.26$84.23$54.28$69.42$69.08$95.76$89.26$79.04$92.85$94.78$43.18$28.25$46.63$69.94$45.75$75.52$86.81$56.81$93.75$70.60$82.93$84.64$
38.55$25.24$41.64
$128.02$150.39$153.50$158.92$186.69$190.55
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$367$879$365$874
II-A, III-A, V-A
$2,162$3,426$4,241$5,629$7,011$8,926$2,162$3,426$4,241$5,629$7,011$8,926$2,162$3,426$4,241$5,629$7,011$8,926$2,266$5,428$1,631$3,167$5,265$7,552$1,621$3,145$5,228$7,500$1,215$2,909$5,397
@
$10,071$19,549$32,502$46,627$10,475$17,415$24,986
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$65.14$83.32$82.89$65.14$83.32$82.89$65.14$83.32$82.89$94.85$51.81$33.90$55.95$83.92$54.91$90.62$68.18$84.72$99.51$46.27$30.28$49.98
$101.08$114.91$107.11$101.08$114.91$107.11$101.08$114.91$107.11$111.43$113.74$153.61$180.47$184.21$190.70$224.03$228.66$104.17$112.50$101.56
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$441$438
$2,595$4,111$5,089$6,755$8,413$2,595$4,111$5,089$6,755$8,413$2,595$4,111$5,089$6,755$8,413$2,720$6,513$1,055$1,957$3,799$6,317$9,062$1,048$1,944$3,773$6,273$9,001$1,457$3,490$6,476
@
$10,711$10,711$10,711$12,084$23,459$39,001$55,952$12,570$20,897$29,983
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$65.43$42.16$53.92$53.65$74.38$69.32$65.43$42.16$53.92$53.65$74.38$69.32$65.43$42.16$53.92$53.65$74.38$69.32$61.39$72.12$73.62$33.53$21.94$36.21$99.43$54.32$35.54$58.66$67.42$44.12$72.81$54.83$64.41$
65.73$29.95$19.60$32.34
$116.81$119.22$123.43$145.00$148.00
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$285$683$283$678$943
$1,680$2,661$3,293$4,372$5,445$6,932$1,680$2,661$3,293$4,372$5,445$6,932$1,680$2,661$3,293$4,372$5,445$6,932$1,760$4,216$7,821$1,267$2,459$4,089$5,866$1,258$2,442$4,060$5,825$2,259$4,191$8,135
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$15,183$25,244$36,215$13,525$19,406
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
195
$81.78$52.70$67.40$67.07$92.97$86.66$81.78$52.70$67.40$67.07$92.97$86.66$81.78$52.70$67.40$67.07$92.97$86.66$76.74$90.15$92.02$41.92$27.43$45.27$67.90$44.42$73.32$84.28$55.16$91.02$68.54$80.51$82.17$
37.43$24.50$40.43
$124.29$146.01$149.03$154.29$181.25$185.00
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$356$853$354$848
II-A, III-A, V-A
$2,099$3,326$4,117$5,465$6,806$8,666$2,099$3,326$4,117$5,465$6,806$8,666$2,099$3,326$4,117$5,465$6,806$8,666$2,200$5,269$9,777$1,583$3,074$5,111$7,332$1,573$3,053$5,075$7,281$1,179$2,824$5,239
@
$18,979$31,555$45,268$10,169$16,907$24,258
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$98.14$63.24$80.89$80.48$98.14$63.24$80.89$80.48$98.14$63.24$80.89$80.48$92.09$50.30$32.91$54.32$81.48$53.31$87.98$66.19$82.25$96.61$98.60$44.92$29.40$48.52
$111.56$103.99$111.56$103.99$111.56$103.99$108.18$110.43$149.14$175.21$178.84$185.15$217.50$222.00$101.14$109.22
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$428$425
$2,519$3,991$4,940$6,558$8,167$2,519$3,991$4,940$6,558$8,167$2,519$3,991$4,940$6,558$8,167$2,640$6,323$1,024$1,900$3,688$6,133$8,798$1,017$1,887$3,663$6,090$8,738$1,414$3,388$6,287
@
$10,399$10,399$10,399$11,732$22,775$37,865$54,322$12,203$20,288$29,109
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
80
100 500 400 800 600
1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,600 4,000 8,000 3,000 6,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 12,000 30,000 60,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000
Threshold
Project Size
-----------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Models First Master Plan
Phase of Master Plan(repeats)
Group Care
Group Care
R Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Moderate - Hazard Storage
----------------------------
IBC
Class
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3.1 R-4 R
S-1
$8.87$4.85$3.17$5.23$9.87
$32.73$38.47$39.24$17.89$11.70$19.31$47.62$55.95$57.08$26.01$17.03$28.09$10.40$10.63$65.26$76.68$78.25$35.66$23.34$38.50$27.60$32.42$33.09$15.08$16.28
$285.73$335.67$342.61$156.11$102.13$168.56
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$819$328$785$255$609$936
@ $9,385$1,963$3,641$7,066$1,457$2,827$4,700$6,743$1,129$2,192$3,647$5,235$2,241$4,159$8,071$2,375$5,687
Size$22,478$41,715$80,956$11,748$16,854$13,419$19,253$10,551$20,478$34,052$48,849
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$134,643$193,169
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$6.06$3.98$6.54
$40.91$48.09$49.05$22.37$14.64$24.14$59.52$69.94$71.36$32.51$21.28$35.11$11.08$13.01$13.29$81.58$95.85$97.81$44.58$29.17$48.13$34.51$40.53$41.36$18.85$12.33$20.35
$357.17$419.58$428.26$195.12$127.67$210.71
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$410$981$318$762
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,024$2,453$4,551$8,832$1,821$3,533$5,876$8,429$1,412$2,740$4,558$6,543$1,170$2,801$5,198$2,968$7,109
@
$11,731$28,098$52,143$14,684$21,068$10,088$16,774$24,066$13,187$25,595$42,561$61,056
Size
$101,195$168,304$241,461
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.27$4.77$7.85
$49.10$57.71$58.86$26.84$17.56$28.97$71.42$83.92$85.63$39.02$25.53$42.14$13.30$15.60$15.94$97.89$53.49$35.00$57.76$41.41$48.64$49.64$22.62$14.80$24.42
$428.60$503.51$513.91$234.15$153.21$252.84$115.02$117.37
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$492$382$913
$1,229$2,943$5,461$1,178$2,185$4,240$7,050$1,694$3,288$5,470$7,852$1,403$3,361$6,237$3,561$8,530
@
$14,078$33,717$62,572$10,598$17,621$25,282$10,114$12,105$20,129$28,880$15,825$30,715$51,075$73,271
Size
$121,434$201,964$289,753
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$8.61$4.71$3.08$5.08$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$9.58
$31.78$37.35$38.10$17.37$11.36$18.75$46.23$54.32$55.42$25.25$16.53$27.27$99.16$10.10$10.32$63.36$74.45$75.97$34.62$22.66$37.38$26.80$31.48$32.13$14.64$15.81
$277.41$325.89$332.63$151.56$163.65
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$0$0$0$0$0$0
$795$318$762$247$591$908
$9,111$1,905$3,534$6,860$1,414$2,744$4,563$6,546$1,096$2,128$3,540$5,082$2,175$4,037$7,835$2,305$5,521
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$21,823$40,500$78,598$11,405$16,363$13,028$18,692$10,243$19,881$33,060$47,426
Size
$130,721$187,542
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
196
$5.88$3.86$6.35$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
$39.72$46.69$47.62$21.72$14.21$23.44$57.79$67.90$69.28$31.56$20.66$34.09$10.76$12.63$12.90$79.20$93.06$94.96$43.28$28.32$46.73$33.50$39.35$40.16$18.30$11.97$19.76
$346.77$407.36$415.79$189.44$123.95$204.57
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$0$0$0$0$0$0
$994$398$952$308$739
II-A, III-A, V-A
$2,381$4,418$8,574$1,767$3,430$5,704$8,183$1,370$2,660$4,425$6,352$1,135$2,719$5,046$9,794$2,881$6,901
@
$11,389$27,279$50,624$98,247$14,256$20,454$16,285$23,365$12,802$24,849$41,321$59,277
Size
$163,401$234,428
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.06$4.63$7.62$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
$47.67$56.03$57.15$26.06$17.05$28.13$69.34$81.48$83.14$37.88$24.79$40.91$12.91$15.15$15.48$95.04$51.93$33.98$56.08$40.20$47.22$48.19$21.96$14.37$23.71
$416.12$488.84$498.94$227.33$148.75$245.48$111.67$113.95
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$0$0$0$0$0$0
I-A, I-B
$477$370$886
$1,193$2,857$5,301$1,143$2,121$4,116$6,844$9,819$1,644$3,192$5,310$7,623$1,362$3,263$6,055$3,457$8,281
@
$13,667$32,734$60,749$10,289$17,107$24,545$11,752$19,542$28,038$15,364$29,820$49,587$71,136
Size
$117,897$196,081$281,313
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
40
600 200 400 800 500
3,000 6,000 2,000 4,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 2,500 5,000 3,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 50,000 12,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 15,000 30,000 60,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
100,000 200,000 500,000 100,000 150,000 300,000
1,000,000
Threshold
Project Size
--------------------------
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Low - Hazard Storage
S Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Private Garage/Agricultural Bldg
Standard Comm. Foundationw/o Podium
Standard Comm. Foundationw/ Podium
--------------------------------
IBC
Class
S-2 S U
$76.33$89.66$91.54$41.69$27.30$45.03
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $1,094$2,621$4,863$9,439
Size$15,693$22,515
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$95.42$52.11$34.11$56.29
$112.08$114.41
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,368$3,276$6,079
@
$11,799$19,616$28,144
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$62.53$40.93$67.55
$114.49$134.50$137.30
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$1,641$3,931$7,294
@
$14,159$23,539$33,773
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$74.11$87.05$88.87$40.48$26.50$43.72
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$1,062$2,544$4,721$9,164
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$15,235$21,859
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
197
$92.64$50.59$33.12$54.65
$108.82$111.08
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$1,328$3,180$5,901
@
$11,455$19,044$27,324
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$60.71$39.74$65.58
$111.16$130.58$133.30
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$1,593$3,816$7,081
@
$13,746$22,853$32,789
Size
Construction Types:
Base Cost Threshold
Resolution 11-
500
2,500 5,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 25,000 50,000
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Threshold
Project Size
----
Schedule D - New Construction Inspection Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
All Other Shell Buildings
Each additional 100 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold.
-----
*
IBC
Class
SHELL BUILDINGS
$51.81$66.68$60.22$30.09$19.23$36.36$77.24$48.70$98.81$51.81$66.68$60.22$30.09$19.23$36.36$66.23$87.29$76.30$39.11$24.84$48.54$41.05$53.48$47.50$24.05$15.30$29.46$78.07$89.89$46.19$29.30$57.47$70.64$
44.08$94.29
$128.39$173.97$146.33$103.17$114.04$161.06$127.89
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $6,288$8,361$5,707$6,990$9,166$6,288$8,361$4,876$6,201$8,383$2,762$3,583$4,920$7,295$5,844$7,406$9,986$5,137$6,048$7,659
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$11,695$17,717$26,741$36,358$12,823$18,618$24,705$11,695$17,717$26,741$36,358$12,198$18,064$24,273$10,901$14,730$14,479$21,407$28,732$10,217$14,454$18,861
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$64.76$83.35$75.27$37.62$24.04$45.44$96.56$60.87$64.76$83.35$75.27$37.62$24.04$45.44$82.79$95.38$48.89$31.04$60.68$51.30$66.84$59.35$30.07$19.14$36.82$97.60$57.73$36.62$71.82$88.29$55.09
$160.49$217.46$182.92$123.52$109.11$128.97$112.36$142.55$201.33$159.85$117.87
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,860$7,133$8,738$7,860$6,096$7,751$3,454$4,481$6,151$9,118$7,305$9,258$6,420$7,561$9,574
@
$10,451$14,618$22,145$33,428$45,447$11,455$16,029$23,271$30,881$10,451$14,618$22,145$33,428$45,447$10,478$15,247$22,580$30,342$13,628$18,411$12,482$18,099$26,758$35,914$12,770$18,068$23,576
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$77.71$90.33$45.13$28.85$54.53$73.03$77.71$90.33$45.13$28.85$54.53$99.34$58.66$37.25$72.81$61.57$80.20$71.22$36.07$22.96$44.19$69.28$43.95$86.19$66.10
$100.01$192.58$260.95$219.50$115.86$148.23$100.01$130.95$114.45$117.11$154.75$134.84$171.07$241.59$191.82$105.95$141.46
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$9,432$8,559$9,432$7,313$9,301$4,145$5,377$7,381$8,767$7,704$9,073
@
$12,540$17,541$26,574$40,113$54,537$10,485$13,747$19,234$27,926$37,056$12,540$17,541$26,574$40,113$54,537$12,574$18,297$27,095$36,408$10,943$16,353$22,093$11,110$14,979$21,720$32,110$43,095$11,488$15
,325$21,680$28,292
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$50.30$64.73$58.47$29.22$18.66$35.30$75.01$47.29$95.94$50.30$64.73$58.47$29.22$18.66$35.30$64.30$84.75$74.08$37.97$24.11$47.13$39.85$51.92$46.12$23.34$14.86$28.60$75.81$87.28$44.82$28.45$55.79$68.58$
42.79$91.56
$124.64$168.89$142.11$100.14$110.72$156.37$124.14
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$6,104$8,116$5,539$6,786$8,897$6,104$8,116$4,733$6,019$8,138$2,682$3,479$4,777$7,083$5,674$7,190$9,693$4,986$5,871$7,435$9,918
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$11,353$17,199$25,966$35,298$12,449$18,075$23,986$11,353$17,199$25,966$35,298$11,842$17,537$23,565$10,584$14,300$14,057$20,780$27,893$14,033$18,311
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
198
$62.88$80.92$73.08$36.53$23.33$44.12$93.76$59.11$62.88$80.92$73.08$36.53$23.33$44.12$80.38$92.60$47.46$30.14$58.91$49.81$64.89$57.65$29.18$18.58$35.75$94.77$56.02$35.57$69.73$85.72$53.48
$155.80$211.11$177.63$119.93$105.94$125.17$109.10$138.40$195.46$155.17$114.45
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,630$6,924$8,482$7,630$5,916$7,524$3,352$4,349$5,971$8,853$7,092$8,987$6,232$7,339$9,294
@
$10,145$14,191$21,499$32,458$44,122$11,121$15,562$22,594$29,983$10,145$14,191$21,499$32,458$44,122$10,172$14,803$21,921$29,456$13,230$17,874$12,117$17,572$25,975$34,867$12,397$17,541$22,889
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$75.45$97.10$87.70$43.83$27.99$52.95$70.93$75.45$97.10$87.70$43.83$27.99$52.95$96.46$56.95$36.17$70.69$59.77$77.87$69.18$35.01$22.29$42.90$67.23$42.68$83.68$64.18
$186.96$253.34$213.16$112.51$143.92$127.13$111.12$113.72$150.20$130.92$166.08$234.55$186.21$102.87$137.33
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$9,156$8,309$9,156$7,100$9,029$4,023$5,218$7,165$8,510$7,478$8,807
@
$12,174$17,029$25,799$38,949$52,946$10,179$13,345$18,674$27,112$35,979$12,174$17,029$25,799$38,949$52,946$12,207$17,763$26,306$35,347$10,624$15,876$21,449$10,785$14,540$21,086$31,170$41,840$11,153$14
,877$21,049$27,467
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
250 500 500 500 200
1,000 5,000 1,250 2,500 5,000 1,000 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,000 4,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 20,000 50,000 12,500 25,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 20,000
Fees Effective July 1,
100,000 100,000
Threshold
Project Size
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
A Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Banks
Laundromat
----------------------------------
IBC
Class
A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4, A-5 A
B B
$76.88$87.76$46.16$29.14$58.85$62.09$79.40$72.33$35.90$22.97$43.06$67.12$86.40$78.04$38.99$24.92$47.12$68.61$96.57$60.38$62.23$80.28$72.26$36.21$23.12$43.88$54.37$69.16$63.47$31.33$20.07$37.34
$103.86$171.78$260.88$186.64$112.00$160.27$156.77$219.71$176.34$127.94
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $6,700$8,237$7,114$9,597$2,448$3,254$4,551$6,891$5,380$6,067$7,372$9,238$3,391$4,018$5,116$6,879$9,777$7,726$5,919$8,093
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$10,833$15,222$22,145$29,429$13,568$20,802$31,573$43,060$10,401$14,139$12,599$16,029$12,796$10,216$14,229$21,456$32,318$43,880$11,552$17,897$27,298$37,334
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$96.10$57.69$36.41$73.57$77.61$99.25$90.43$44.87$28.71$53.82$83.90$97.55$48.75$31.16$58.92$85.77$75.48$77.79$90.33$45.26$28.90$54.85$67.97$86.44$79.33$39.16$25.10$46.66
$129.82$109.71$108.00$214.72$326.11$233.30$140.01$200.36$195.96$274.64$220.43$120.71$159.94$100.36
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$8,374$8,892$3,060$4,067$5,687$8,614$6,726$7,584$9,215$4,239$5,021$6,395$8,599$9,658$7,399
@
$10,297$13,543$19,028$27,681$36,786$11,997$16,958$26,003$39,466$53,824$13,001$17,674$11,547$15,747$20,037$12,221$15,995$12,769$17,787$26,821$40,399$54,850$10,118$14,439$22,372$34,122$46,668
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$69.24$43.71$88.29$93.14$53.85$34.47$64.58$58.49$37.39$70.69$90.57$93.35$54.32$34.68$65.82$81.56$95.19$47.00$30.11$56.00
$115.33$155.78$131.66$119.10$108.51$100.69$129.61$117.05$257.67$391.32$279.97$168.00$102.91$240.43$235.15$329.57$264.53$144.85$191.92$120.42$108.40$103.73
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$3,672$4,881$6,825$8,070$9,101$5,085$6,026$7,673$8,877
@
$10,049$12,355$16,250$22,832$33,219$44,144$10,670$14,396$20,350$31,202$47,358$64,588$10,336$15,601$21,208$11,057$13,857$18,897$24,043$10,319$14,664$19,193$11,590$15,322$21,343$32,183$48,477$65,819$12
,141$17,326$26,846$40,945$56,000
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$74.64$85.19$44.82$28.29$57.14$60.28$77.09$70.24$34.86$22.30$41.80$65.17$83.89$75.77$37.86$24.20$45.76$66.60$93.77$58.61$60.42$77.95$70.16$35.15$22.45$42.60$52.79$67.12$61.62$30.42$19.49$36.25
$100.83$166.79$253.30$181.20$108.76$155.61$152.21$213.32$171.20$124.22
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$6,504$7,996$6,906$9,317$2,377$3,159$4,417$6,690$5,223$5,890$7,156$8,968$3,291$3,900$4,966$6,678$9,491$7,500$9,917$5,746$7,857
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$10,517$14,777$21,500$28,571$13,171$20,195$30,652$41,804$10,097$13,727$12,231$15,561$12,422$13,814$20,830$31,376$42,601$11,213$17,376$26,501$36,246
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
199
$93.31$56.02$35.36$71.43$75.35$96.36$87.79$43.57$27.88$52.25$81.46$94.71$47.32$30.25$57.19$83.25$73.27$75.52$97.43$87.70$43.94$28.06$53.25$65.98$83.90$77.03$38.02$24.36$45.31
$126.04$106.49$104.86$208.48$316.62$226.50$135.95$194.52$190.27$266.65$214.00$117.22$155.28
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$8,129$9,996$8,632$2,971$3,948$5,521$8,362$6,528$7,362$8,945$4,113$4,875$6,208$8,348$9,375$7,182$9,822
@
$13,146$18,471$26,874$35,714$11,646$16,464$25,244$38,314$52,255$12,621$17,158$11,210$15,289$19,452$11,864$15,528$12,396$17,268$26,038$39,220$53,251$14,016$21,719$33,126$45,307
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$67.23$42.43$85.71$90.43$52.28$33.46$62.71$97.76$56.79$36.30$68.63$99.90$87.92$90.62$52.73$33.67$63.90$79.18$92.44$45.63$29.23$54.37
$111.97$151.24$127.79$115.63$105.35$125.83$113.65$250.18$379.94$271.80$163.14$233.42$228.32$319.99$256.80$140.66$186.33$116.92$105.24$100.68
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$9,755$3,565$4,738$6,625$7,834$8,835$4,936$5,849$7,449$8,619
@
$11,995$15,776$22,165$32,249$42,857$10,359$13,976$19,757$30,292$45,977$62,705$10,035$15,146$20,590$10,734$13,452$18,347$23,342$10,017$14,237$18,633$11,250$14,875$20,721$31,246$47,064$63,901$11,786$16
,820$26,063$39,752$54,369
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
500 300 100 500 100 500
2,500 5,000 1,000 5,000 1,500 3,000 6,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 5,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 15,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 20,00050,000
Fees Effective July 1,
100,000 100,000 100,000
Threshold
Project Size
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Medical Office
Offices
B Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Preschool/School
E Occupancy
Tenant Improvements
Factory/Industrial
F Occupancy Tenant Improvements
---------------------------------
IBC
Class
B B B E E F-1, F-2
F
$69.56$65.18$64.14$51.09$70.61$57.80$31.17$19.55$40.70$79.83$49.68$37.12$46.19$43.66$21.07$13.59$24.49$67.49$89.64$77.56$40.06$25.40$50.14
$173.51$265.61$187.81$113.78$163.99$165.53$243.72$182.35$105.57$146.80$163.65$238.57$181.08$103.65$142.76$127.91$182.62$142.80$107.74
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $5,609$6,302$7,630$9,509$4,552$5,214$6,432$8,255$4,303$4,957$6,150$7,961$5,113$6,135$7,900$3,044$3,556$4,469$5,897$8,291$6,444$9,414$3,148$3,958$5,302$7,630
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$12,922$16,401$11,423$14,682$11,070$14,278$10,789$15,464$20,353$10,776$14,034$22,765$35,411$48,988$11,235$15,045
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$86.96$81.48$80.19$63.86$88.26$72.24$38.96$24.44$50.88$99.77$62.08$46.40$57.76$54.57$26.35$16.97$30.62$96.96$50.08$31.74$62.68
$216.87$332.01$234.75$142.24$204.99$206.90$304.66$227.93$131.97$183.50$204.57$298.22$226.35$129.57$178.46$159.89$228.28$178.49$134.67$900.12$112.06
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,012$7,877$9,538$5,690$6,516$8,039$5,379$6,195$7,687$9,951$6,391$7,668$9,874$3,805$4,444$5,585$7,371$8,056$3,935$4,948$6,628$9,537
@
$11,885$16,152$20,501$10,319$14,278$18,352$13,838$17,847$13,487$19,332$25,443$10,365$13,468$11,767$17,542$28,457$44,264$61,234$14,044$18,806
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$97.76$96.22$76.65$86.67$46.76$29.33$61.06$74.50$55.68$69.30$65.49$31.61$20.36$36.74$60.09$38.09$75.21
$260.25$398.40$281.71$170.68$104.33$245.99$248.29$365.58$273.53$158.36$220.21$245.48$357.85$271.63$155.48$214.15$105.92$191.87$273.94$214.18$119.75$161.61$101.24$134.47$116.35
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$8,412$9,454$6,827$7,820$9,647$6,454$7,436$9,225$7,668$9,202$4,566$5,334$6,702$8,844$9,665$4,722$5,937$7,953
@
$11,445$14,262$19,382$24,599$12,382$17,133$22,021$11,940$16,604$21,416$11,850$16,184$23,198$30,530$12,436$16,162$14,120$21,050$34,148$53,116$73,482$11,443$16,852$22,566
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$67.53$63.27$62.28$49.60$68.56$56.11$30.26$18.99$39.52$77.51$48.21$36.04$44.87$42.38$20.46$13.20$23.79$65.53$87.03$75.30$38.89$24.66$48.68
$168.45$257.87$182.34$110.47$159.21$160.70$236.64$177.03$102.52$142.53$158.89$231.64$175.79$100.63$138.61$124.19$177.31$138.63$104.60
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$5,444$6,118$7,407$9,231$4,418$5,061$6,244$8,014$4,176$4,812$5,970$7,728$4,963$5,955$7,669$2,954$3,451$4,338$5,724$8,049$6,255$9,139$3,056$3,842$5,147$7,407
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$12,545$15,921$11,090$14,253$10,747$13,861$10,474$15,014$19,760$10,460$13,626$22,101$34,379$47,577$10,907$14,605
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
200
$84.42$79.09$77.84$61.99$85.70$70.13$37.83$23.73$49.40$96.89$60.27$45.05$56.09$52.97$25.58$16.50$29.74$81.91$94.13$48.61$30.82$60.85
$210.56$322.34$227.92$138.09$199.02$200.88$295.80$221.28$128.15$178.16$198.61$289.55$219.74$125.79$173.26$155.24$221.63$173.29$130.75$108.79
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$6,805$7,647$9,259$5,522$6,326$7,805$5,220$6,015$7,462$9,660$6,204$7,444$9,586$3,693$4,314$5,422$7,155$7,819$3,820$4,802$6,434$9,258
@
$11,538$15,681$19,902$10,018$13,862$17,816$13,434$17,326$13,093$18,767$24,700$10,062$13,075$11,423$17,032$27,626$42,973$59,471$13,633$18,256
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$94.90$93.41$74.39$84.16$45.40$28.48$59.28$72.32$54.06$67.30$63.57$30.69$19.80$35.68$98.29$58.34$36.98$73.03
$252.67$386.81$273.50$165.71$101.30$238.82$241.06$354.96$265.54$153.78$213.79$238.33$347.47$263.69$150.95$207.91$102.84$186.28$265.96$207.95$116.27$156.90$130.55$112.96
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$8,166$9,177$6,627$7,591$9,366$6,264$7,218$8,955$7,445$8,932$4,432$5,177$6,506$8,586$9,383$4,583$5,763$7,721
@
$11,111$13,846$18,817$23,882$12,021$16,634$21,379$11,592$16,120$20,791$11,503$15,711$22,521$29,640$12,074$15,690$13,708$20,438$33,151$51,568$71,365$11,110$16,360$21,908
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
100 500 100 500 100 500 500 100 500 300
1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 2,500 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 2,000 1,500 3,000 6,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 15,000 30,000
Fees Effective July 1,
100,000 200,000
Threshold
Project Size
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
H-1 Occupancies
Hazardous Rooms
H Occupancy
Tenant Improvements
Institutional
I Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Market
M Occupancy Tenant Improvements
-----------------------------
IBC
Class
H-1 H-2 toH-5 H I-1 to I-4 I M
M
$47.52$63.45$54.48$28.30$17.92$35.66$45.12$56.90$52.84$25.84$16.60$30.51$40.01$50.00$46.96$22.79$14.68$26.62$86.19$62.21$62.60$97.75$68.31$44.36$56.26$77.82$83.63$88.19$81.00$69.65
$104.62$114.63$104.96$153.95$118.87$153.15
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $6,151$7,673$3,614$5,060$7,335$3,939$5,231$6,165$7,417$9,510$2,776$3,801$4,466$5,590$7,148$8,820$5,678$7,252$8,467$9,860
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$10,210$14,569$21,360$28,527$11,562$17,764$24,406$10,969$15,768$23,271$37,360$57,874$79,879$11,464$12,940$15,316
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$59.40$79.32$68.10$35.37$22.41$44.57$56.41$71.12$66.04$32.31$20.77$38.14$50.01$62.51$58.70$28.49$18.34$33.28$77.75$78.25$85.39$55.44$70.34$97.27$87.07
$107.73$130.78$122.18$143.29$104.54$110.24$131.22$101.26$192.44$148.60$191.44
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,690$9,592$4,518$6,324$9,169$4,924$6,540$7,706$9,271$3,469$4,751$5,582$6,990$8,934$7,096$9,065
@
$12,764$18,211$26,700$35,659$14,451$22,205$30,507$13,712$19,711$29,088$46,700$72,343$99,847$11,886$14,331$11,025$10,584$12,325$16,174$19,146
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$71.28$95.17$81.72$42.44$26.88$53.49$67.69$85.34$79.24$38.77$24.91$45.76$60.00$75.02$70.45$34.19$22.00$39.93$93.31$93.90$66.54$84.40
$129.28$156.95$146.62$171.95$102.47$116.75$125.46$132.30$157.45$121.51$104.49$230.94$178.32$229.74
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
SEE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE
I-A, I-B
$9,228$5,422$7,588$5,908$7,848$9,246$4,163$5,701$6,698$8,386$8,516
@
$11,508$15,315$21,852$32,038$42,790$11,001$17,342$26,645$36,609$16,453$23,653$34,906$56,040$86,811$11,124$14,263$17,196$10,721$13,230$10,878$12,699$14,790$19,408$22,975
Size
$119,817
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$46.13$61.61$52.89$27.48$17.39$34.62$43.81$55.24$51.29$25.09$16.12$29.62$38.84$48.57$45.61$22.12$14.24$25.85$83.67$60.42$60.75$94.90$66.34$43.08$54.61$75.56$81.20$85.63$78.66$67.61
$101.57$111.29$101.93$149.47$115.41$148.70
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$5,972$7,448$9,912$3,509$4,911$7,120$3,823$5,078$5,985$7,200$9,231$2,694$3,689$4,335$5,428$6,939$8,563$5,511$7,040$8,220$9,572
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$14,144$20,740$27,695$11,224$17,246$23,694$10,648$15,309$22,594$36,276$56,188$77,550$11,129$12,562$14,870
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
201
$57.66$77.01$66.12$34.36$21.74$43.27$54.77$69.04$64.12$31.36$20.15$37.02$48.55$60.71$57.01$27.66$17.80$32.31$75.52$75.94$82.93$53.85$68.26$94.44$98.33$84.51
$104.59$126.97$118.62$139.12$101.49$107.03$127.42$186.84$144.27$185.87
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,465$9,310$4,386$6,138$8,900$4,779$6,348$7,481$9,000$3,368$4,612$5,419$6,784$8,673$6,889$8,800
@
$12,390$17,679$25,925$34,619$14,030$21,557$29,618$13,310$19,136$28,243$45,345$70,235$96,938$11,539$13,912$10,703$10,275$11,965$15,702$18,587
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$69.19$92.42$79.34$41.23$26.08$51.93$65.72$82.85$76.94$37.64$24.18$44.43$58.26$72.86$68.41$33.19$21.36$38.78$90.63$91.13$99.52$64.62$81.91
$125.51$152.36$142.35$166.94$113.33$121.79$128.44$152.90$117.99$101.41$224.21$173.12$223.05
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
SEE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE
I-A, I-B
$8,957$5,263$7,366$5,735$7,618$8,977$4,041$5,534$6,503$8,141$8,267
@
$11,172$14,868$21,215$31,110$41,542$10,680$16,836$25,868$35,541$15,972$22,963$33,892$54,415$84,282$10,800$13,847$16,694$10,408$12,844$10,560$12,330$14,358$18,842$22,305
Size
$116,326
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
800 800 499
4,000 8,000 4,000 8,000 3,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
16,000 40,000 80,000 16,000 40,000 80,000 15,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Fees Effective July 1,
150,000 300,000
Threshold
Project Size
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Apartment Bldg
Apartment Bldg - Repeat Unit
Hotels & Motels
Dwellings - Custom, Models, First Master Plan
Dwellings - Production Phaseof Master Plan(repeats)
------------------------
IBC
Class
R-2 R-2 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-3
$76.79$81.00$62.61$97.55$72.09$63.44$59.06$77.05$86.19$69.62$69.93$92.62$80.42$41.42$26.27$51.71$61.31$94.52$58.83$63.82$86.49$72.74$38.42$24.22$49.14
$125.95$143.29$102.47$110.99$118.62$139.87$175.27$210.02$147.44$243.83$153.67$102.27$157.43$151.51$216.26$169.16$127.53
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $6,242$7,393$8,608$9,862$4,296$5,377$6,328$7,511$9,052$6,263$6,854$8,074$9,610$2,879$3,364$4,229$5,583$7,850$6,817$8,348
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$11,812$14,330$11,100$10,236$11,528$13,307$14,700$17,498$21,002$10,685$13,483$18,112$26,155$38,582$51,715$12,678$15,743$10,204$10,942$15,307$22,221$29,488
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$95.98$78.26$90.10$79.31$73.82$96.31$87.02$87.40$51.78$32.83$64.64$76.62$73.55$79.79$90.93$48.02$30.28$61.43
$101.27$121.94$157.43$179.13$128.09$138.75$107.72$148.29$174.84$219.09$262.54$115.79$100.53$184.31$304.79$192.09$127.84$196.77$189.40$270.33$211.45$118.16$159.43$108.11
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,801$9,241$5,369$6,720$7,911$9,387$7,829$8,566$3,599$4,206$5,286$6,978$9,813$8,521
@
$10,761$12,326$14,765$17,913$11,314$13,876$12,793$14,409$16,634$18,375$21,872$26,254$13,355$16,852$22,642$32,694$48,226$64,644$10,090$12,012$15,847$19,678$12,755$10,436$13,679$19,135$27,777$36,859
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$93.92$95.17$88.59$62.13$39.40$77.57$91.96$88.27$95.74$57.62$36.33$73.72
$115.18$121.52$146.33$188.92$214.95$108.13$115.57$153.70$166.50$129.27$177.95$104.45$209.81$262.90$315.04$104.89$138.95$120.63$221.16$365.75$230.52$153.40$236.13$227.28$324.38$253.73$141.80$191.32$12
9.73$109.11
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$9,362$6,444$8,065$9,494$9,395$4,319$5,045$6,343$8,372
@
$11,089$12,912$14,791$17,717$21,496$11,265$13,577$16,650$15,353$17,291$19,962$22,050$26,246$31,504$16,027$20,222$27,169$39,233$57,871$77,572$10,279$12,108$14,413$19,015$23,613$11,776$15,307$10,224$12
,522$16,414$22,961$33,332$44,231
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$74.55$78.65$60.79$94.71$69.99$61.60$57.34$74.81$99.48$83.67$67.63$67.89$89.95$78.07$40.21$25.52$50.22$99.29$59.52$91.79$57.10$61.97$83.97$70.64$37.29$23.52$47.71
$122.27$139.12$107.76$115.17$135.77$170.16$203.91$143.15$236.73$149.20$152.83$147.11$209.94$164.23$123.82
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$6,059$7,177$8,357$9,573$4,170$5,220$6,144$7,291$8,787$9,937$6,080$6,653$7,837$9,329$2,794$3,265$4,105$5,419$7,622$9,906$6,617$8,104
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$11,467$13,912$10,776$11,192$12,919$14,272$16,987$20,391$10,372$13,088$17,586$25,393$37,457$50,218$12,307$15,283$10,623$14,862$21,574$28,628
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
202
$93.19$98.32$75.98$87.49$77.00$71.67$93.51$84.53$84.86$97.59$50.27$31.90$62.77$74.40$71.37$77.46$88.30$46.61$29.39$59.64
$118.39$152.84$173.91$124.36$134.71$104.59$143.96$169.71$212.71$254.88$112.44$178.94$295.91$186.50$124.12$191.04$183.89$262.42$205.29$114.74$154.77$104.96
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$7,574$8,972$5,212$6,525$7,680$9,113$7,600$8,316$9,796$3,493$4,081$5,131$6,773$9,527$8,271
@
$10,446$11,966$14,334$17,391$10,983$13,471$12,421$13,990$16,149$17,840$21,234$25,488$12,966$16,360$21,982$31,741$46,821$62,773$11,661$15,384$19,104$12,382$10,130$13,279$18,577$26,967$35,785
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$91.18$92.40$86.01$60.32$38.28$75.33$89.27$85.65$92.95$55.93$35.27$71.57
$111.83$117.98$142.07$183.41$208.69$104.99$112.21$149.23$161.65$125.51$172.76$101.44$203.66$255.25$305.86$101.84$134.93$117.11$214.72$355.09$223.80$148.94$229.25$220.66$314.91$246.35$137.69$185.73$12
5.95$105.96
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$9,088$6,255$7,830$9,216$9,121$9,979$4,191$4,897$6,157$8,128$9,926
@
$10,766$12,536$14,359$17,200$20,869$10,936$13,180$16,165$14,905$16,788$19,379$21,408$25,481$30,586$15,559$19,632$26,379$38,089$56,185$75,327$11,755$13,993$18,461$22,925$11,432$14,858$12,157$15,935$22
,293$32,360$42,942
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
80
100 500 400 800 600
1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 2,000 5,000 1,600 4,000 8,000 3,000 6,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 12,00030,000 60,000
Fees Effective July 1,
100,000
Threshold
Project Size
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
First Master Plan
of Master Plan(repeats)
Group Care
Group Care
R Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Moderate-Hazard
Storage
----------------------------
IBC
Class
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3.1 R-4 R
S-1
$8.04$4.89$4.39$5.63
$33.28$39.96$39.61$18.46$12.00$20.48$52.08$68.17$60.14$30.60$19.46$37.69$11.98$18.94$12.76$11.94$15.07$25.39$22.61$35.47$73.89$84.17$44.54$28.08$57.09$29.25$36.93$34.22$16.77$10.78$19.82
$339.67$483.62$379.59$211.59$131.71$284.74$100.35
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $4,364$5,615$7,660$3,189$3,731$4,700$6,217$8,757$4,380$4,858$5,806$7,082$9,495$2,183$2,249$2,475$2,588$3,096$3,548$6,657$8,134$8,925
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$16,599$29,909$49,892$89,507$11,268$16,776$22,611$11,391$11,941$10,644$14,853$21,532$28,549$12,435$17,976$28,244$43,338$59,489
$144,878$204,896
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$6.12$5.48$7.05
$41.59$49.95$49.51$23.07$15.01$25.60$65.09$85.21$75.18$38.25$24.32$47.10$14.96$23.68$15.96$10.06$14.92$18.83$31.73$28.25$44.33$92.37$55.67$35.08$71.37$36.57$46.17$42.78$20.96$13.46$24.78
$424.59$604.52$474.49$264.47$164.65$355.95$125.43$105.22
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$5,455$7,017$9,574$3,986$4,665$5,875$7,771$5,474$6,073$7,257$8,851$2,729$2,810$3,094$3,234$3,869$4,434$8,321
@
$20,748$37,386$62,364$14,083$20,969$28,264$10,946$14,239$11,867$14,926$10,168$13,305$18,565$26,915$35,687$11,155$15,543$22,467$35,301$54,168$74,355
Size
$111,883$181,097$256,119
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.35$6.57$8.46
$49.91$59.95$59.42$27.68$18.00$30.73$78.10$90.22$45.91$29.18$56.53$17.97$28.41$19.14$12.06$17.91$22.60$38.09$33.91$53.20$66.81$42.10$85.65$43.88$55.41$51.35$25.15$16.15$29.73
$102.24$509.52$725.43$569.39$317.37$197.58$427.13$110.85$150.52$126.26
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$6,545$8,420$4,782$5,598$7,049$9,326$6,569$7,286$8,708$3,274$3,373$3,712$3,881$4,643$5,320$9,984
@
$24,898$44,863$74,838$11,488$16,900$25,163$33,918$13,135$17,086$10,622$14,241$17,910$12,201$15,965$22,277$32,299$42,825$13,386$18,651$26,962$42,363$65,003$89,230
Size
$134,259$217,316$307,344
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$7.81$4.73$4.26$5.47
$32.31$38.80$38.46$17.90$11.66$19.89$50.56$66.18$58.39$29.71$18.89$36.59$11.63$18.39$12.39$11.58$14.63$24.65$21.95$34.44$71.74$97.42$81.72$43.24$27.25$55.43$28.40$35.86$33.23$16.28$10.45$19.25
$329.78$469.53$368.53$205.42$127.88$276.46
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$4,236$5,449$7,435$3,095$3,622$4,561$6,036$8,501$4,251$4,716$5,636$6,874$9,217$2,119$2,183$2,402$2,512$3,005$3,444$6,462$7,897$8,664
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$16,114$29,037$48,438$86,899$10,938$16,286$21,952$11,058$11,582$10,332$14,419$20,904$27,717$12,072$17,451$27,421$42,075$57,756
Size
$140,605$198,927
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
203
$9.76$5.91$5.32$6.84
$40.38$48.50$48.08$22.38$14.58$24.87$63.20$82.72$72.99$37.13$23.61$45.73$14.53$22.99$15.49$14.48$18.28$30.81$27.43$43.04$89.68$54.05$34.06$69.29$35.50$44.82$41.54$20.35$13.07$24.06
$412.23$586.91$460.67$256.77$159.86$345.57$121.78$102.15
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
$5,295$6,812$9,293$3,868$4,528$5,702$7,545$5,314$5,895$7,044$8,593$2,649$2,728$3,003$3,139$3,756$4,304$8,077$9,871
@
$20,142$36,296$60,548$13,673$20,357$27,440$10,626$13,823$11,521$14,477$12,916$18,023$26,131$34,647$10,829$15,088$21,812$34,273$52,589$72,188
Size
$108,623$175,756$248,659
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$7.09$6.38$8.21
$48.46$58.20$57.69$26.85$17.50$29.84$75.84$99.27$87.59$44.56$28.33$54.88$17.44$27.59$18.58$11.71$17.37$21.94$36.98$32.92$51.65$64.86$40.88$83.15$42.60$53.79$49.85$24.42$15.68$28.88
$494.68$704.29$552.80$308.13$191.83$414.69$107.61$146.14$122.59
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
$6,354$8,174$4,642$5,434$6,842$9,053$6,376$7,074$8,453$3,178$3,274$3,603$3,767$4,507$5,165$9,693
@
$24,171$43,555$72,657$11,152$16,407$24,429$32,929$12,751$16,588$10,312$13,825$17,372$11,845$15,499$21,628$31,357$41,576$12,995$18,107$26,175$41,129$63,109$86,630
Size
$130,348$210,907$298,391
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
40
600 200 400 800 500
3,000 6,000 2,000 4,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 2,500 5,000 3,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 50,000 12,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 20,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 50,000 15,000 30,000 60,000
Fees Effective July 1,
100,000 200,000 500,000 100,000 150,000 300,000
1,000,000
Threshold
Project Size
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
Low-Hazard Storage
S Occupancy Tenant Improvements
Private Garage/Agricultural Bldg
Standard Comm. Foundationw/o Podium
Standard Comm. Foundationw/ Podium
--------------------------------
IBC
Class
S-2 S U
$87.59$99.27$53.26$33.48$69.29
$120.53
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
@ $8,556
II-B, III-B, IV, V-BSize
$10,308$13,322$18,284$26,274$34,642
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$66.57$41.84$86.60
$109.50$150.67$124.07
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
@
$10,695$12,885$16,652$22,856$32,842$43,302
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$79.89$50.20
$131.38$180.81$148.90$103.93
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
@
$12,833$15,461$19,982$27,427$39,411$51,963
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Changes indicated in strikethrough and bold. 3% increase.
$85.04$96.35$51.73$32.49$67.26
$117.03
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
$8,306
@
II-B, III-B, IV, V-B
$10,007$12,933$17,750$25,510$33,632
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
204
$64.67$40.61$84.08
$106.30$146.28$120.44
Each
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
II-A, III-A, V-A
@
$10,383$12,509$16,166$22,188$31,888$42,040
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
$77.60$48.73
$127.56$175.54$144.52$100.90
Each
2011
100 sf *
Cost for
Additional
I-A, I-B
@
$12,460$15,011$19,399$26,625$38,265$50,448
Size
Construction Types:
Threshold
Base Cost
Resolution 11-
500
2,500 5,000
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10,000 25,000 50,000
Fees Effective July 1,
Threshold
Project Size
- - - -
Schedule D - Consolidated Schedule of Total Construction Fees
IBC Occupancy Type
All Other Shell Buildings
Each additional 100 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold.
-----
*
IBC
Class
SHELL BUILDINGS
4444656565
130130130
0.070.090.14
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
42 42 63 63 63
126 126 126
0.07 0.08 0.13
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
205
Resolution 11-
Fee Types
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
Travel and Documentation Fees:Mechanical Permit FeeStand Alone Mechanical Plan Check (hourly rate)UNIT FEES:Residential ApplianceNew multi-family residential buildings (apartments and
condominiums) having three or more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other non-commercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square
foot New and single and two-family residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square footNew
commercial buildings and completely remodeled spaces not including the area of garages, per square footFor the repair of alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration
unit, cooling unit, VAV boxes, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this Code (Commercial)For
each air-handling unit, A/C units, heat pumps to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto. Does not apply to central type (Commercial)For each air-handling
unit, A/C units, heat pumps to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto. Does not apply to central type (Residential)Repair/Alteration/Addition to
each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated
by this code. (Commercial)Repair/Alteration/Addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative
cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this code. (Residential)
ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISC. FEESMECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
339822656565656598
130130130130120142163185
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
32 95 21 63 63 63 63 63 95
126 126 126 126 116 137 158 179
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
206
Resolution 11-
Fee Types
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
For each air-handling unit A/C unit, heat pump over 10,000 cfmp to and including 3HP, or each absorption system up to and including 100,000 Btu/h. (Residential)For the installation or
relocation of each commercial or industrial-type hoodFor the installation of each residential hood that is served by a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hoodFor the installation
or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/hFor each ventilation system
which is not a portion of any heating or air conditioning system authorized by a permitFor each ventilation fan connected to a single ductFor the installation or relocation of each
forced air or gravity type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/hFor the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including
ventFor the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater (Commercial)For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater,
recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater (Residential)For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit
(Commercial)For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit (Residential)For the installation or relocation
of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h (29.3 kw)For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/hFor the installation or relocation of each boiler
or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/hFor the installation or relocation of each
boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/hFor the installation or relocation
of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h
99
654444446565653322
130130
0.070.090.14
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
8 8
63 42 42 42 63 63 63 32 21
126 126
0.07 0.08 0.13
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
207
Resolution 11-
Fee Types
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this Code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this CodeOTHER FEES:Other Mechanical
Inspections (per hour)Plumbing Permit FeeStand Alone Plumbing Plan Check (hourly rate)UNIT FEES:New multi-family residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three or
more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other non-commercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same, per square footNew single and two-family residential
buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square footNew commercial buildings and completely remodeled
spaces not including the area of garages, per square footFor installation, alteration or repair of water piping water treating equipmentFor repair or alteration of drainage or vent
piping, floor, area, condensate pipingFor each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping and backflow protection therefore)For each gas
piping system of one (1) to four (4) outlets (Commercial)For each gas piping system of one (1) to four (4) outlets (Residential)For each gas piping system of five (5) or more, per outletFor
each industrial waste pre-treatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen type grease traps functioning as fixture trapsKitchen type trap and/or systemFor each
building sewer, sanitary sewer, and each trailer park sewer (Commercial)
PLUMBING/GAS PERMIT FEES
97
222626221265656544
130130130130
0.070.090.14
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
8 6
21 25 25 21 11 63 63 63 42
126 126 126 126
0.07 0.08 0.13
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
208
Resolution 11-
Fee Types
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
1 to 5over 5 each additional(apartments and condominiums) having three or more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other non-commercial automobile storage areas
constructed at the same time, per square footbuildings not including the area of garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square footnot
including the area of garages, per square foot
For each building sewer, sanitary sewer, and each trailer park sewer (Residential)Storm/rainwater systems per drainFor each water heater and/or vent (Commercial)For each water heater
and/or vent (Residential)Water service (Residential)Re-pipe per fixture (Commercial)Re-pipe per fixture (Residential)For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow
protection devices thereforeFor atmospheric type vacuum breakers/backflow not included in item 1For each private sewage disposal systemFor each cesspoolOTHER FEES:Other Plumbing and
Gas Inspections (per hour)Electrical Permit FeeStand Alone Electrical Plan Check (hourly rate)SYSTEM FEES:New multi-family residential buildingsNew single and two-family residentialNew
commercial buildings and completely remodeled spaces
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
22444465774465774422
130
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
21 42 42 63 74 42 63 74 42 21
126
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
209
Resolution 11-
Fee Types
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self-contained room console, or
through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor operated appliances not exceeding one
horsepower (HP) in rating, eachFor residential appliances and self-contained factory-wired, non-residential appliances non exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovotampere
(kVA) in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases; drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines; or other
similar types of equipment, eachFor services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each (Commercial)For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1,000
amperes in rating, each (Commercial)For services over 600 volts over 1,000 amperes in rating, each (Commercial)For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating,
each (Residential)For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1,000 amperes in rating, each (Residential)For services over 600 volts over 1,000 amperes in rating, each
(Residential)For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, eachFor additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee,
eachFor electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth
UNIT FEES:Residential AppliancesNon-Residential AppliancesServices (Temporary Power)Signs, Outline Lighting and MarqueesMiscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits, Conductors, and Special Circuits
34
3333332244651412
130130
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
2 3
32 32 32 21 42 63 13 11
126 126
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
210
Resolution 11-
Fee Types
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
1 unit2 through 5 units, each additional6 and over, each additionalFirst 20Additional outlets, eachFirst 20Additional fixtures, each
For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatuses,
as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (kW), kilovolt-amperes (kVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR):For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereofFor
receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters follows:For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp holding
devices
Power Device/ApparatusBuswaysReceptacle, Switch and Lighting OutletsLighting FixturesFor pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, eachFor theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies
eachOTHER FEES:Other Electrical Inspections (per hour)
41
130170588652260260994130963327170392327718588260130523523457457783914457457
1,4821,2051,0441,0444,4372,740
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
39
126570633253252965126934317380317697570507507443443760887443443
NewNewNewNew
1,4381,1691,0131,0134,3072,660
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Unit
eacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheach
eacheach
1 hour
1 hour1 hour
per hour1/2 hour
each unit
251-499 sf251-499 sf
up to 250 sfup to 250 sfup to 250 sf
211
Resolution 11-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Miscellaneous Items
Work Item
Multi-Family/CommercialOver the counter-(not hillside-has conventional framing- Minimum 2 hours). Plan Check Fees (not hillside).Plan Check Fees (not hillside).each additional hourInspection
Fees (Not Hillside)Inspection Fees (Not Hillside)RadioCellular/Mobile Phone, free-standingCellular/Mobile Phone, attached to buildingSpecial Inspector Certification ApplicationMaterials
Testing Lab CertificationInterior wallExterior wall
Standard Hourly RateAccessibility Hardship ExemptionAcoustical ReviewAdditions (R3 Occ) - Plan Check FeesAdditions (R3 Occ) - Inspection FeesAddress AssignmentAdministrative/Clerical
Fee - 1/2 hour flat rate (covers changes in contractor/architect information and permit extensions)Alternate Materials and Methods of ConstructionArbor/TrellisAwning/Canopy (supported
by building)Balcony AdditionCarportCertifications Special Inspector Qualifications (initial review) Special Inspector Qualifications (renewal / update)ChimneyChimney RepairClose
Existing OpeningsCommercial Coach (per unit)Covered PorchDeck (wood)Deck Railing
65656565
130523260523130300523260130260392100170170210392652260652457359783
1,1751,175
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
6363
126507253507126291507253126253380380633253633443348760
NewNewNewNewNewNew
1,1401,140
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Unit
eacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheach
each
1 hour1 hour
30 min30 min
per hour
2 hours
each 100 l.f.each 100 l.f.
up to 100 l.f.up to 100 l.f.
each 3,000 sfeach 3,000 sfeach 3,000 sf
212
Resolution 11-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Miscellaneous Items
Work Item
Commercial (each add'l 3,000 sf)Residential (each add'l 3,000 sf)Swimming Pool ResidentialSwimming Pool Commercial (up to 3,000 sf)Swimming Pool Commercial (each add'l 3,000 sf)Non-masonry,
each additional 100 lfMasonry, each additional 100 lf
Commercial (up to 3,000 sf)Residential (up to 3,000 sf)New door (non structural)New door (structural shear wall/masonry)Non-masonry, over 6 feet in heightMasonry, over 6 feet in heightMasonryPre-Fabr
icated/MetalWood frame up to 1,000 sfMasonry up to 1,000 sf
Standard Hourly RateDemolitionDemolitionDisabled Access Compliance InspectionDoorDuplicate/Replacement Job CardElectric Vehicle Charging StationExtensions Plan Check Applications
(within 180 days of Submittal) Permits (within 180 days of Issuance) Start construction, w/o plans Resume or complete construction, w/o plans Start construction,
w/ plans Resume or complete construction, w/ plansFenceFireplaceFlag pole (over 20 feet in height)Foundation RepairGarage (detached)
8
9898
130130391195130130130260130130783392392783170457457652652652523783783783652214521914783914783130
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
7
9595
126126379189126126253126126760380380760443443633633633507760760760633207505887760887760126
NewNew
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
Unit
eacheacheacheacheach
1 hour1 hour1 hour1 hour
1 hour
2 hours
each 10each 10
up to 10up to 10
per hourper hourper hour
per hour
up to 2 hrs
each 1 kW
each 30 l.f.each 30 l.f.up to 8 kW
up to 30 l.f.up to 30 l.f.
each 300 sfeach 300 sf
up to 300 sfup to 300 sfup to 300 sfup to 300 sfup to 300 sfup to 300 sf
213
kilowatts
Resolution 11-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Miscellaneous Items
Work Item
Additional patioAdditional enclosed patioAdditional Piles (increments of 10)Additional Piles (increments of 10)
Standard Inspection Hourly RateOutside of normal business hours, 0-2 hours (minimum charge)Each additional hour or portion thereofProgress InspectionPartial InspectionCourtesy Inspection
- 2 hour minimumhour (minimum charge = 1/2 hour)Cancelled inspection w/out advance noticeeach add'l poleAdditional partitionAdditional partitionWood frameMetal frameOther frameEnclosed,
wood frameEnclosed, metal frameEnclosed, other frameResidentialMulti-Family Res/Commercial, up to 8Multi-Family Res/Commercial, each additional 1 kilowattCast in Place Concrete (first
10 piles)Driven (steel, pre-stressed concrete)
Standard Hourly RateInspectionsLife Safety ReportLighting poleModular StructuresModification of Technical CodePatio Cover/ Sun RoomPhotovoltaic SystemPile FoundationProduct Review
651414
130130195588588392258187359163783652914783979848979848979848783783783652652652523718
3,9385,232
Fee
$ $ 1.5 x PC Fee$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
$ 130
and bold.
631313
126570570380250181348158760633887760950823950823950823760760760633633633507697
NewNewNewNew
3,8235,079
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Unit
eacheacheacheacheacheacheach
per hourper hourper hour
per hour2500 sf +
1000 sf
each 50 l.f.each 50 l.f.each 50 l.f.each 50 l.f.each 50 l.f.
up to 50 l.f.up to 50 l.f.up to 50 l.f.up to 50 l.f.up to 50 l.f.
each 300 sfeach 300 sfeach 300 sfeach 100 sfeach 100 sfeach 100 sf
up to 300 sfup to 300 sfup to 300 sfup to 100 sf
each 2,500 sf
214
Resolution 11-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Miscellaneous Items
Work Item
Additional remodelAdditional remodelAdditional remodelCommercial (first 5,000 sf)Commercial (each add'l 2,500 sf)Additional retaining wallAdditional retaining wallAdditional retaining
wallAdditional Gravity/Crib WallAdditional Gravity/Crib Wall
Standard Plan Review Hourly RateCALGreen Plan Review (minimum 2 hr charge in addition to Plan Check Fees)Expedite Plan ReviewOutside of normal business hours, (minimum 2 hr charge in
addition to Plan Check Fees) KitchenBathOther RemodelOther RemodelOther RemodelResidentialMulti-Family DwellingCommercialStandard (up to 50 lf)Special Design, 3-10' high (up to 50 lf)Special
Design, over 10' high (up to 50 lf)Gravity/Crib Wall, 0-10' high (up to 50 lf)Gravity/Crib Wall, over 10' high (up to 50 lf)Commercial NewTenant ImprovementSFDWLAdditionRemodelAdditional
roof structure replacement
Standard Hourly RatePlan ReviewRe-roofRetaining Wall (concrete or masonry)RevisionsRoof Structure Replacement
656598336565
130588392196260130327327327327260260391392718100327196327359457130195130
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
636395326363
126570380190253126317317317317253253379380697317190317348443126189126
New
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Unit
eacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheach
each
per hourper hourper hour
per flight
first flight
first 100 lf first 100 lf
each 100 lfeach 100 lffirst 30 minfirst 30 min
each 400 sfeach 400 sf
up to 400 sfup to 400 sfup to 400 sf
215
Resolution 11-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Miscellaneous Items
Work Item
Additional sidingEach additional Directional Signeach additional 100 lfeach additional 100 lf
Stone and Brick Veneer (interior or exterior)All Other DirectionalGround/Roof/Projecting SignsMaster Plan Sign CheckRework of any existing Ground SignOther SignReinspection FeeWall/Awning
Sign, Non-ElectricWall, ElectricLess than 10 sfGreater than 10 sf or structuralEach additional flight0-8' high (up to 100 lf)over 8' high (up to 100 lf)Additional Stucco ApplicationFirst
1/2 hour minimumEach Additional hourOvertime Plan Check FeeFirst 1/2 hour minimumEach Additional hour
Standard Hourly RateSidingSignsShed over 120 square feetSkylightSolar Water HeatingStorage RacksStucco Applicationsmore inspections than average, the Building Official may charge additional
inspection feesSupplemental Plan Check Fee (after 2nd review)
130914652196229327260391380392130457783783
1,4351,827
Fee
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $
Changes shownin strikethrough3% increase.
and bold.
126887633190222317253379380126443760760
New
1,3931,773
Fee
No refund No refund No refund
Double fees
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
80% of permit fees
Unit
eacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheacheach
each
100% of Plan Review Fees
first 8
each 8
2 hours
each 100 sf
216
Resolution 11-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule D - Miscellaneous Items
Work Item
Vinyl-lined (up to 800 sf)FiberglassGunite (up to 800 sf)Additional pool (over 800 sf)Commercial pool (up to 800 sf)Commercial pool (over 800 sf)Spa or Hot Tub (Pre-fabricated)Replacement
(first 8 windows)Replacement (each add'l 8 windows)New Window (non structural)New window (structural shear wall/masonry)Bay Window (structural)Plan review more than 3 Business Days
after the Date of SubmittalNo inspections within 180 days of permit issuance No inspections more than 180 days after permit issuanceInspections were provided
Standard Hourly RateSwimming Pool/SpaTemporary Occupancy Permit - flat rateTemporary StructuresTenant Improvement PreparationWindow or Sliding Glass DoorRefunds - Plan Check Fees
1st review not started (within 3 Business of Submittal)Refunds - Building Permit FeesWork without permit-based on current permit andplan check feesFOOTNOTE:Fee Adjustments: In instances
where the strict application of fees from this schedule would constitute a substantialinequity to an applicant or to the City, the Chief Building Official shall be authorized to adjust
such fees on a case-by-case basis. Any such adjustments shall be recorded in writing and entered into the appropriate files.
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Recreation classes and excursion fees shall be determined as follows:
Classes
1. Determine the maximum hourly rate paid to instructor.
2. Multiply the instructor's hourly rate by the number of class meetings.
3. Determine the minimum number of participants and divide into the instructor's cost.
4. Add indirect overhead percent - 32%.
5. Add 20% to establish non-resident fee.
6. Add cost for specialized equipment or supplies.
Special Conditions: For classes taught by contract instructors, the indirect overhead is
only added to the City's percentage.
Excursions
1. Transportation cost divided by the number of participants plus overhead transfer.
2. Add 20% to establish non-resident fee.
3. Add any admission cost, supplies or leadership cost.
Additional factors that may be used to determine the class or excursion user fee:
The total number of participants in a given activity may generate additional revenue
whereby the total program cost may be reduced.
Classes that traditionally have waiting lists may have the user fee increased.
Programs in competition with adjacent cities or the private sector may require fees to be
increased or decreased to remain competitive.
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx1
217
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Facility Use Fee Schedule (Staff Use Only)
CLASSIFICATIONS:
Group I: City of Cupertino activities that are open to the public. Official city sponsored programs.
Group II: Clubs with 51% resident membership, recreation programs and events with full or
affiliated city co-sponsorship and open to the public.
Group III: Programs and events sponsored by Cupertino based non-profit recreation, education
or community service organization with 51% resident participation.
These organizations must show an official structure and status.
Group IV: Cupertino Residents/Cupertino Businesses - Private, special interest or business groups
for functions not open to the public. These functions would include parties, banquets,
receptions, industrial conferences, seminars, trade shows, etc.
Group V: Programs and events sponsored by non-resident non-profit recreation, education or
community service organization. These organizations must show official structure and status.
Group VI: Non - Residents/ Non-Resident Businesses - Private, special interest or
business groups for functions not open to the public. These functions would include
parties, banquets, receptions, industrial conferences,seminars, trade shows, etc.
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx2
218
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Quinlan Community Center
ROOM RENTAL SCHEDULE PER HOURS
Cupertino RoomMon-Fri up to 5:00 pmFri 5:00 pm-Sun
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$30$80
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$30$80
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$140$230
Non-Resident Non-Profit (Group V)$50$140
Non-Resident/Non-Resident Business (Group VI)$170$280
Social Room
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$20$60
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$20$60
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$45$90
Non-Resident Non-Profit (Group V)$25$75
Non-Resident/Non-Resident Business (Group VI)$55$110
Conference Room*
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$10$25
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$10$25
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$40$60
Non-Resident Non-Profit (Group V)$25$50
Non-Resident/Non-resident Business (Group VI)$50$75
*Note: Conference Room is not available to rent the months of June, July, or August
Security Staff
Security staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility. $25.00 per hour.
Overtime Fee
Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 $200.00 for any time up to the first half
hour, and $150.00 $200.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit.
This applies to all City facilities.
Security Deposit
A security deposit shall be required for Groups III, IV, V, and VI. Security deposit is due at time of reservation.
The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security deposit will
be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time.
Quinlan Community Center
Cupertino Room - Res/Cupt Bus./Cupt. Bus. Promotional & Non-Res.$750
All Other Rooms -Res/Cupertino Business $300
All Rooms - Co-Sponsored/Cupt Non-Profit/Non-Res./Non-Profit$300
General Liability Insurance - All groups required $1M w/endorsement - $2M w/alcohol, w/endorsement to policy
showing City of Cupertino as Additional Insured.
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx3
219
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Monta Vista Recreation Center/Creekside Park Building
Room Rental Schedule Per Hour
Monta VistaCreekside Park
Recreation CenterBuilding
Classroom
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$25 $30$25 $30
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$25 $30$25 $30
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$50 $55$50 $55
Non-Resident/Non-Profit (Group V)$40$40
Conference Room/Kitchen
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$25 $30N/A
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$25 $30N/A
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$50 $55N/A
Non-Resident/Non-Profit (Group V)$40N/A
Security Staff
Security Staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility: $25.00 per hour.
Overtime Fee
Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 $200.00 for any time up to the first half
hour, and $150.00 $200.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit.
This applies to all City facilities.
Security Deposit
A $100 security deposit shall be required for Groups III, IV, V and VI. Security deposit is due at time of
reservation. The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security
deposit will be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time.
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx4
220
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Senior Center
ResidentNon-Resident
Annual Membership
$22$30
End of Aug. to End of Oct. Membership Sale
$17$22
Day Pass Fee
$5$5
Class Pass
$10$15
Day Trip Pass
$20$25
Room Rental Schedule Per Hour
Evenings and
Reception RoomWeekends *
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$12
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$80
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$230
Non-Resident/Non-Profit (Group V)$140
Classroom, Conference Room, Arts & Crafts Room, Bay Room
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$12
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$60
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$90
Non-Resident/Non-Profit (Group V)$75
* Senior Center rooms are not available for rental Monday through Thursday 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Security Staff
Security Staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility: $25.00 per hour.
Overtime Fee
Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 for any time up to the first half
hour, and $150.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit. This
applies to all City facilities.
Security Deposit
A security deposit shall be required for Groups III, IV, V and VI. Security deposit is due at time of reservation.
The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security deposit will
be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time.
Cupertino Senior Center
Reception Hall - Group IV$750
All Other Rooms - Group IV$300
Group II, III, V - All Rooms$300
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx5
221
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Outdoor Facilities
Memorial Softball Field
Cupertino residents/Resident business only$25.00
Non-Residents$40.00
Field can be reserved for a maximum of 2 hours. THERE IS NO FEE FOR
CURRENT SOFTBALL TEAMS PLAYING IN CUPERTINO LEAGUES
Field preparation (includes dragging, watering, chalking, and bases)$36.50
Field Attendant (2 hour minimum). Field Attendant is required any time lights or field$8.25/hr
preparation is requested.
Lights (in the evening)$5.00/hr
Memorial Park Amphitheater
Cupertino resident/Resident business$55.00
Non-Resident/Non-Resident business$75.00
Memorial Park Gazebo
Cupertino resident/Resident business$55.00
Non-resident/Non-resident business$75.00
Picnic Areas (daily rate)
Cupertino residents/Resident business$55.00
Cupertino business$75.00
$80.00 $75.00
Non-residents/Non-resident business
Non-resident business$100.00
Electricity at Memorial or Linda Vista Park$25.00
Sports Field Fees
Adult Leagues (two hour minimum)$50.00/hr
Deposit$600.00
Youth Leagues (participant/season)
Resident$11.00
Non-resident$22.00
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx6
222
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Blackberry Farm
Picnic Areas (Daily Rate) *ResidentNon-Resident
Area 1 - 200-300 Person Picnic Area$250$500
Area 2 - 100 Person Picnic Area$100$200
Area 3 - 100 Person Picnic Area$100$200
Area 4 - 50 Person Picnic Area$50$100
Area 5 - 50 Person Picnic Area$50$100
Area 6 - 25 Person Picnic Area$25$50
Pool Pass for Picnic Area Groups$2 per person$3 per person
Day-Use Pass Only
Weekday Tuesday - Friday$4.00$6.00
Weekend Saturday - Sunday$6.00$8.00
Picnic area fees are due in full at the time of reservation.
* Organizations may rent multiple areas.
Swim Pass OptionsResidentNon-Resident
10-day Pass$40$60
Season Swim Pass (May-Sept)
Individual Pass$100$140
2-Person Pass$160$200
3-Person Pass$170$210
4-Person Pass$180$220
5-Person Pass$190$230
6-Person Pass$200$240
7+ - Family Members - per person$5$7
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx7
223
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Sports Center/Child Watch/Teen Center
TypeResidentNon-Resident
Day Passes$7.00$10.00
Monthly Passes
One MonthSingle$55.00$65.00
One MonthCouple$75.00$90.00
One MonthFamily$95.00$115.00
Annual Passes
One YearJuniors (<17)$295.00$330.00
One YearSingle$420.00$455.00
One YearCouple$805.00$880.00
One YearFamily$900.00$980.00
One YearSenior$375.00$405.00
Sports Center Conference Room Rental Rates$40.00$48.00
Multi-Purpose Room$60.00$72.00
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
1. The Cupertino Tennis Club will be charged $10.00/hour during primetime and $6.00/hour per court
during non-primetime for all C.T.C. sponsored activities other than U.S.T.A. leagues and practices.
2. All competitors in C.T.C./U.S.T.A. leagues participating at the Sports Center must purchase an annual
pass.
3. Individuals may purchase a ten pack of day passes, $60.00 Resident, $90.00 Non-Resident.
4. Specials will be offered on an on-going basis.
Child Watch Fees
One visit$5.00
Ten visits$45.00
One Month Pass$100.00
Teen Center
Rental Rate$200.00Per 3 hours
Deposit$750.00
Overtime Rate: $100.00 first hour; $50.00 each half hour after.
Teen ResidentTeen Non-Resident
Daily RateNo Cost$5.00
10 Day PassNo Cost$40.00
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx8
224
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Community Hall
ROOM RENTAL SCHEDULE PER HOUR
Mon-Fri Up to Fri 5:00 p.m.-
5:00 p.m.Sun
Co-Sponsored (Group II)$80 $30$250 $80
Cupertino Non-Profit (Group III)$80 $30$250 $80
Resident/Cupertino Business (Group IV)$80 $140$250 $230
Non-Resident Non-Profit (Group V)$80 $50$250 $140
Non-Resident/Non-Resident Business (Group VI)$100 $170$300 $280
Security Staff
Security staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility: $25.00 per hour.
Overtime Fee
Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 $200.00 for any time up to the first half
hour, and $150.00 $200.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit.
This applies to all City facilities.
Security Deposit
A security deposit shall be required for All Classifications (Groups). Security deposit is due at time of
reservation. The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security
deposit will be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time.
Community Hall
All Classifications - Fri thru Sun Resident/Cup Business/Cup Business Promotional & Non-Resident$750
All Classifications - Mon thru Thurs Co-Sponsored/Cupertino Non-Profit/Non-Resident Non-Profit$300
*If a non-profit 501c form is provided, the fee is $300
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx9
225
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Resolution 11-
Fees Effective July 1, 2011
Schedule E - Recreation
Blackberry Farm Golf Course
Daily Green Fee Schedule
WeekendsWeekdays
ResidentNon-ResidentResidentNon-Resident
9-Holes
$17.00$19.00$16.00$17.00
Senior
$17.00$19.00$14.00$15.00
Junior
$14.00$16.00$14.00$15.00
Second 9 Holes (all players)
$11.00$13.00$11.00$13.00
All Groups and Tournaments pay the full rate (Cupertino residents still applies). Staff is authorized to set
merchandise fees according to current cost.
Annual Rate (Weekdays Only)Adults (17-61)Jr/Sr
Cupertino Residents$1,040$965
Non-Residents$1,225$1,135
Semi-Annual Rate (Weekdays Only)
Cupertino Residents$610$520
Non-Residents$645$575
Super Annual Rate (Good on Weekends & Holidays)
Cupertino Residents$1,175$1,175
Non-Residents$1,315$1,315
Super Semi-Annual Rate (Good on Weekends & Holidays)
Cupertino Residents$595$595
Non-Residents$700$700
Quick Passes
WeekdayWeekdayWeekdayWeekday
SeniorAdultSeniorAdultWeekendWeekend
Res.Res.NRNRRes.NR
Savings
per round
# of Plays
10$1$130$150$150$160$160$180
20$2$240$280$280$300$300$340
30$3$330$390$390$420$420$480
40$4$400$480$480$520$520$600
50$5$450$550$550$600$600$700
Golf fees may be increased/decreased at the discretion of the City Manager, Resolution No. 04-350.
10
G:\\Finance\\Budget\\FEESCHEDULES\\2011\\Fee Schedule_ E_Parks Recreation 2011.xlsx
226
PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3354www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
AlternativeBridgeLocationsand TrailAlignmentsforStevensCreekCorridorProjectPhaseII.
RecommendedAction
AdopttheBaseAlignmentbridgelocationandageneraltrailalignmentbetweenthesecondrow
of orchardtreesandthecreekriparianzonefortheStevensCreekCorridorParkPhaseII.
Discussion
OnJanuary18,2011,Councilauthorizedstafftoinitiatevariousactionsfortheproject,
includinginitiatingthedesigneffortforAlternative4A(consistingofaneastbankcreek
restorationand usingapprovedmaster planned bridgeandtrailalignment).
OnMarch15,2011,CouncilheldaStudySessiontodiscussalternativebridgelocationsandtrail
alignments.Aregularagendaitemwasalso heardwiththeintentofadoptingabridgealignment
andgeneraltrailparameterssothatthenextphaseofdesigncouldproceedandthatfewer
alternativeswould needto be studied duringtheCEQAanalysis.
TheCouncil directed stafftoreport back on April5withthefollowing:
·Considerlocatingthetrailbetweenthesecondrowoforchardtreesandariparian
setbackfromthecreekbank
·Analyzeadditional upstream bridgelocations
·MeetwiththeStocklmeir TaskForce
·Provideacostand designanalysisforeachalternative
·Lookat howthetrailwillintersectwithStevensCreekBoulevard
OnMarch28,2011,staffmetwiththeStocklmeirTaskForceandpresentedalternativebridge
locationsfortheirconsideration.Thosealternativelocations,alongwiththeBaseAlignment
alterative,are depictedintheattachedexhibitsand summarized below.
227
Bridgealternatives,numbered2,3and4,areprovidedforasExhibitAforCouncil
consideration.
AlternativeBridgeLocationNo. 2
Thisbridgewillneedtobeapproximately70feetinlengthtospanthecreekandprevent
damagetotherootsofseverallarge sycamoreandoaktrees.Thewesternendofthebridgewill
extendsubstantiallyinsidetheMeadows100footsetbackandbeapproximately50feetfromthe
Meadowspropertylineandthenearestresidence.Theinstallationofthisbridgewillrequirethe
removal ofanoaktreeontheeast bankthatisapproximately 28 inchesindiameter.
AlternativeBridgeLocationNo. 3
Thisbridgewillneedtobeapproximately85feetinlengthtospanthecreekandprevent
damagetotherootsofseverallargeoaktrees.Thewesternendofthebridgewillextend
substantiallyinsidetheMeadows100footsetbackandbeapproximately60feetfromthe
Meadowspropertylineandthenearestresidence.Theinstallationofthisbridgewillrequirethe
removalofseveralbuckeyetreesonthewestbankanda13inchelderberryontheeastbank.
An unhealthysycamoreontheeast bankwillmostlikely needtoberemovedfor safetyreasons.
AlternativeBridgeLocationNo. 4
Thisbridgewillneedtobeapproximately105feetinlengthtospanthecreekandprevent
damagetotherootsofaverylarge(84inchdiameter)oaktreeonthewestbank.Thewestern
endofthebridgewillrestoutsidetheMeadows100footsetback.Theinstallationofthisbridge
willrequiretheremovalofan unhealthysycamore on theeast bankfor safetyreasons.
BaseAlignment
TheBaseAlignmentbridgewillbeapproximately60feetinlengthtospanthecreekand
preventdamagetotherootsofaverylarge(84inchdiameter)oaktreeonthewestbank.
Severallimbsontheoaktreewillneedtobetrimmedforbothconstructionandeventual
pedestriansafety.ThewesternendofthebridgewillrestwelloutsidetheMeadows100foot
setback.A16inchdiameteroaktreeontheeastbankmayneedtoberemovedtoinstallthe
bridge.
AttheconclusionoftheStocklmeirTaskForcemeeting,themembersreachedageneraland
nearunanimousagreementthattheypreferredtheBaseAlignmentbridgealternativefora
varietyofreasons.Theyalsorecommendedthatthetrailberoutedthroughtheeasternedgeof
theorchard,nearthecreekbutoutsideariparianzone.Thetaskforceurgedthisroutebe
acceptedtoprotecttheorchardandstillprovideforanearbycreekexperiencebythetrailusers.
ImportantfactorsfortheTaskForcememberswerethatthetrailseparatethecreekandorchard
experiencesandthatasmuchflexibilityaspossibleberetainedforthefutureLegacyFarm.
Staffwillcontinuetoworkwiththe TaskForceasthetrail designprogresses.
228
BridgeAlternativeCostComparison
AlternativeNo.BridgeandProtectiveFenceCost
ImpactfromBase
BaseAlignment0
2(10,000)
335,000
465,000
TheprojectbudgetcurrentlyaccommodatesanamountfortheBaseAlignmentbridgespanand
the necessaryfoundationsystem. Thefoundationandinstallationcostsforthealternativeswould
also be higher duetotheincreasedlength ofthe spans.
Thealternativebridgelocationswouldreducethelengthofgolfprotectionfencerequiredand
therebythecostoftheassociatedprotectionfence.Thetableaboveshowstheapproximatenet
impacttothecurrent budgetforeach ofthealternative bridgelocations.
It should be notedthattheabovecostestimates showninthetableareroughestimates.
TrailAlignment
TheStocklmeirTaskForcemembersalsoconcludedthatthetrailwouldcreatetheleastnumber
ofimpactsifitwereroutedalongtheeastsideoftheorchardnearthecreekriparianzone.
MembersofthetaskforcerepresentingtheMeadowsagreedthatthetrailcouldencroachonto
the100footsetbackbutshouldnotbeplacedanycloserthanthesecondrowoforchardtrees.
Thesecondrowoforchardtreesisapproximately80feetfromtheMeadowspropertyline.The
taskforcemembersalsoagreedwiththe suggestionthatadditionalorchardtreescould be planted
alongthewest sidetoenhance privacyifthetrailwereroutedalongthewest side ofthe orchard.
Thedesignofthetrail’sintersectionwithStevensCreekBoulevardwilltakeintoaccountbike
andpedestriansafetyandwillemploybestdesignelementstoaccommodatetheperpendicular
intersectionandthevehicularspeedsoneastboundStevensCreekBoulevard.Measurescould
employ both physicaland signageelementstolessenthe potentialforconflicts.
Conclusion
StaffagreeswiththeStocklmeirTaskForcethattheBaseAlignmentbridgelocationandthatan
easterly orchardtrailroute strikethe best balanceforallthe stakeholdersconcerned.
SustainabilityImpact
Anyoneoftheproposedalternativebridgelocationsandatrailalignmentbetweenthesecond
rowoforchardtreesandthecreekriparianzonewouldfullysupporttheCity’ssustainability
goals.
____________________________________
Preparedby:TerryGreene,CityArchitect
Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks
MarkLinder,Director ofParksandRecreation
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachments:
ExhibitA-BridgeLocationAlternatives
ExhibitB-Stocklmeir TaskForce MeetingNotes
229
green
th
8
tee
th
8
green
th
7
230
ATTACHMENTB
EXHIBITB
StevensCreekCorridorPark-PhaseII
StocklmeirTaskForceMeetingNotes
March28,2011
Overview:
TimmBorden,DirectorofPublicWorksmadeopeningstatementsandprovidedbackgroundinformation
regarding thePhaseIIprojectandCouncil’sdirectiontoinvestigatealternativebridgeand traillocations
for theApril 5,2011CityCouncilmeeting.
TerryGreene,CityArchitect,presented theprojecthistoryand thecurrentstatusregardingalternative
bridgelocationsandtrailalignments.Mr.Greene explained that themeeting was toreceivefeedback
about thebridgeand traillocationswithrespectto the100’setbackfrom theMeadowsandariparian
setback expected tobeapproximately50feetfrom thetopofbankat thecreek.Healsosaid theCity
wantstohearconcernsandsuggestionssostaffcanmakerecommendationstoCityCouncil.Mr.Greene
said thatabridgelocationandalignmentneedtomoveforwardin theCEQAprocesssothatcurrent
grantfundingdeadlinescanbemet,andafinalCouncildecisioncanbemadeonMay 17,2011.
Mr.Greenesaid thatanadditional taskforcemeetingwillbescheduledpriortoMay 17,2011.
GailSeeds,ProjectManager,describedeachof thebridgelocationsand where the100’setbackfrom
theMeadowswaslocated. ThegroupviewedexhibitswhileMs.Seeds explainedeachof thebridge
locations,howlong they wouldlikelybe,andhow theyrelatedtothe100’setbackand what thegeneral
lossof treesfor eachlocationmightbe.
TaskForce CommentsandConcerns:
Q. Thereisavisionfora LegacyFarmon theStocklmeirsite – don’tplace the trailorbridgeinsucha
wayastopreclude therestorationof theorchardintoalegacyfarm.
A.Staffwillwork withthe taskforceand thedesignteam tofind theoptimum traillocationthat will
preserve thelegacyfarm concept.
Q.If thebridgeismovedupstreamfromtheBaseAlignment,thegolfcourseballprotectionfence will
beshorter–won’tthatbebetterfor thetrailusersand thegolfers?
A.Yes,ashorterfencewouldbebetterforboth trailusersandgolfers.
Q.If thegolfcourseprotectionfenceisanettypelike theoneneartheBlackberryFarmparkinglotit
maycauseaproblemforbirdsin theriparianareaalong thecreek.
Page 1
231
A.Thegolfballprotectionfenceis expectedtobeachainlinkfencewithacurved top–itshouldnot
beahazard.Nettingisnotplannedforanypartofthefence.
Q.Are thereany treesthat willbelostifthebridgeismovedupstream?
A. Yes,inonecaseforbridgealternativenumber 2,alargeoaktree willhave toberemoved.Amature
sycamorewillalsoprobablyneedtoberemovedforalternatives3and4butithasalargeholeinits
baseandmayneedtoberemovedasasafetyitemanyway.Severalbuckeyetrees willneedtobe
removedforbridgealternative 3 aswell.(itshouldbenoted thatanoak willneed toberemoved
for theBaseAlignmentbridgeaswell– thiswasoverlookedandnotmentionedin themeeting)
Q.Ifbridgealternativenumber2wereselected,wouldn’tonlyoneresidentintheMeadowsbe
affectedby the trail encroachinginto the100footsetback?
A. Yes,if the trail wereroutedalongthe edgeof theeasterncreekriparianzoneandnotalong thewest
sideof theorchard.
Q.Wouldthemembersof theMeadowsbewilling tobeflexibleon the100footsetbackif the trail
wereroutednocloserthan thesecondrowoforchard trees?Possiblyanotherrowoforchard trees
couldbeplantedin thelargeopenspacenearthepropertylinetoprovidemoreprivacy.
A.We thinkso.Privacyandsecurityareaconcernforalltheresidents.
Q.Doesthetrailneed tobe8feet wide?
A. Yes,itis theappropriate widthforbicyclistspassing eachotherandgivingroomforpedestrianstoo.
Q.Whattypeof trailmaterialhasbeenconsidered?
A. The trail through theorcharddoesnotneedtobethehardbutporousconcreteusedinPhase1.It
couldconsistofdecomposedgraniteorlikematerialandflush with theorchardon eitherside.
Q.Pleasedon’tlet the trailuserswalkon theorchard treeroots.Itwillkillthetrees.
A.We willroute the trailpast theorchardtreestoprotect therootzones.Wemayneedto transplant
sometreestoprevent themfrombeingdamagedbytrailusers.
Q.Can theorchardtreesbe transplanted?
A. Yes,webelieveso.
Q.Whatare theCity’splansfortheoldwellandpumphousesat theupper endof theorchard?
Page 2
232
A.Weintendtoseeif thewellcanbeputbackintoservice.Itwasdamagedinthe1989earthquake.
Wewouldliketouseitforirrigating theorchardsincewebelieveweobtainedthe waterrights
whenwepurchasedtheproperty.
Q. Thewelllidneedstobecheckedforsafetyreasons.
A.We willdo thatrightawayandmakeitsafe.
Q.How wide will thebridgebe?
A.We’replanningona10footwidebridgelike theonecrossing thecreektothepicnicareaat
BlackberryFarm. Thebridgeneeds tobewideenough toallowasmallmaintenancevehicletopass
overit.
Q.Howcloseto thecreekcan thetrailbeplaced?Itwouldbeniceiftrailuserscould walkdowntothe
creekinplacesto enjoy thecreek.
A.If the trailfollowsalong theriparianzoneof thecreek, wetoohopethataplaceortwocanbe
created where trailusers can walkupcloseto thecreek.
Q.Doesthetrailhavetogoup theStocklmeirdriveway?
A. Yes,unfortunatelyitseems thereisnoalternativerouteforthetrail. Thedriveway widthis
controlledby the existingrockwallaround thehouse, therockpondsnear thefront,andalsobya
large eucalyptus treenearthe entry.
Q. Thereseemtobealotofgolfballsin theorchardjustnorthofwhere thebackwaterisplanned.
A. Yes, thegolfersteeingofftoward theninthholeoftenhitballsacross thecreekbyaccident.It
wouldbe wisetoroutethe trailalittlefurthertothewestin thatareatoprevent trailusersfrom
beinghit.
Q.Where willthebusesbedroppingoffpeopleorchildrenusing the trail?
A. Thebusdropofflocationsarecurrentlybeingdesignedandareexpectedtobelocatedalong
StevensCreekBlvd.sincethelargebusescannotbesafelydriveninto theStocklmeirdrivewaynor
can theyevenbedriveninto theBluePheasantparkinglotwithoutlosinganumberofrequired
parkingspots.
Q.Wehopethatwhateveralternativesareselected,theywillnot threatenthepossibilityofgettingthe
grantmoneyforcreekrestoration.
Page 3
233
A.Weagreeandwe’re tryingveryhardtokeeptheprojectonschedule.
Q.Itappears thatthereisgeneralconsensusthat thebestbridgelocationis theBaseAlignmentand
thebest trailalignmentisalong theeastsideof theorchardjustoutsidetheriparianzone.
A. Thank youforyourparticipationtoday.Wewillpresentthisinformationto theCouncilat theApril
thth
5meeting.We willfollowup withanothertaskforcemeetingbefore theMay17meetingand,if
theCouncilgivesusdirectiontoproceed withtheproject,we willinvite yourcommentsagain
during theCEQAprocessandin thedesignprocess.
Page 4
234
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3308www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
Reconsideration petitionforaCityCouncil denial ofanappeal ofanapprovedwireless
communicationsfacilityat 11371 BubbRoad
RecommendedAction
ConductahearingonapetitionforreconsiderationregardingtheCityCouncil’sdecisiononthe
wirelesscommunicationsfacilityat 11371 BubbRoad.
AdoptResolutionNo.______,DenyingthePetitionofShaulBergerseekingCouncil
reconsiderationofitsdecisiontoapprovethewirelesscommunicationsfacilityat11371Bubb
RoadinaccordancewithPlanningCommissionResolutionNo. 6616 (SeeAttachmentA).
Description
PetitiontoreconsideraCityCouncil decisionto denyanappeal ofaDirector’s Minor
ModificationApprovaltoallowa personalwireless servicefacility,consisting ofthree panel
antennasandassociatedequipmentinstalled on anexistingPacific,Gas& Electric polelocated
infront of 11371 BubbRoad.
Discussion
Background
Thefollowingisa summary ofthevariouseventsthat occurredregardingthis projectleading up
tothereconsiderationrequest:
Sept. 7, 2010CommunityDevelopmentDirectorapprovedwirelessfacilitywitha
Director’s Minor Modification,DIR-2010-28(AttachmentB).
Sept. 20, 2010Projectapprovalappealedbyadjacent propertyownerShaulBerger
(AttachmentC).
Nov. 9, 2010ThePlanningCommissionconsideredtheappealandrecommendeddenial
oftheappeal on a 4-0-1vote(AttachmentD, E,&F).
Nov. 29, 2010TheCityCouncil heardtheappealand denieditona 3-2 vote(Attachment
G,H).
Dec. 9, 2010AppellantShaulBergerfiles petitionforreconsideration(AttachmentI).
Feb. 1, 2011Reconsideration hearingcontinuedto March 15, 2011.
March 15, 2011Reconsideration hearingcontinuedtoApril 5, 2011.
235
Background/CouncilDirection
TheCityCouncilcontinuedthereconsideration hearingfromFebruary 1, 2011to March 15,
2011togivethepetitionerandapplicanttimeto discusstheir differencesincalculatingtheradio
frequencyenergyexposures ofthe proposed T-Mobile personalwireless servicefacility.A
continuancewasrequestedbythepetitioner because hisengineerwould beout ofthecountryin
March,andthiswasagreedtobytheapplicant.TheCityCouncilcontinuedthe hearingtoApril
5, 2011. Theapplicantattemptedtoreachthe petitionerinFebruary butwas not successful
(Attachment M ).Sincetheyhave not had discussions,thereis no newinformationfor staffto
present on radiofrequencyenergyexposures.
Basisforthe Reconsideration
TheCity’s MunicipalCode, section 2.08.096, provides proceduresforinterested partiesto
petitiontheCityCounciltoreconsiderits decisions.A petitionforreconsideration shall specify
in detaileachandeverygroundforreconsideration.Failureofa petitionto specifyany
particulargroundorgroundsforreconsiderationprecludesthatparticularomittedground or
groundsfrom beingraised orlitigatedina subsequentjudicial proceeding. The groundsfor
reconsiderationarelimitedtothefollowing:
1)An offer of newrelevantevidencewhich,intheexercise ofreasonable diligence,could not
have been producedatanyearliercityhearing.
2)An offer ofrelevantevidencewhichwasimproperlyexcludedatany priorcity hearing.
3)Proof offactswhich demonstratethattheCityCouncil proceededwithout, orinexcess ofits
jurisdiction.
4)Proof offactswhich demonstratethattheCityCouncilfailedto provideafair hearing.
5)Proof offactswhich demonstratethattheCityCouncilabusedits discretionby:
a)Not precedinginamannerrequiredbylaw;and/or
b)Renderinga decisionwhichwas not supportedbyfindings offact;and/or
c)Renderinga decisioninwhichthefindingsoffactwere not supportedbytheevidence.
The petitionforreconsiderationconsists ofthreepagesaccompaniedbyapetitionwith 31
signatories.Reconsideration ofthisitemconstitutesthethirdfull hearingofthismatter
conductedbytheCity.As statedinthe petition’sintroductoryparagraphs,the petitioner has
madeclaimsforreconsideration undertheabovereferencedcriteria #2, #4,#5band #5c. The
petitioner submitted hisradiationanalysis(AttachmentK) on January 27, 2011, 49 daysafterthe
reconsideration petitionwasfiled on December9, 2010. Theanalysisclaimsfora
reconsideration underreferencedcriteria #1. TheCity’sfindingsoffactandresponses on each
ofthesecriteriaare setforth below.
1.An offer ofnewrelevantevidencewhich,intheexercise ofreasonablediligence,couldnot
havebeenproduced at anyearliercityhearing.
Finding: Theoffer of newrelevantevidencebythe petitionercould havebeen presentedatthe
CityCouncilappeal hearing ofNovember 29, 2010 orwiththereconsideration petition
submitted on December9, 2010, instead of 49 dayslater on January 27, 2011.
236
PetitionResponse
Inthepetitioner’sanalysis of powerdensity,Theapplicant’sradiofrequencyenergy
assumptionsaremadeaboutthe T-mobileconsultantfindsthe petitioner’smethodology
equipmentand powerdensityiscalculatedasaandcalculationsto bereasonable,exceptforan
percentage ofthe MaximumPermissibleerrorin usingthe proposed output powerfrom
Exposure(MPE)allowedbytheFederaltheantennaasthe output powerfromthe
Governmentfor uncontrolledenvironments(1transmitter,whichaccordingtotheconsultant
milliwatt percentimetersquared) Therearemakesall ofthe petitioner’sresultstoo highby
three pagescalculatingpower density 12 feet,afactor ofabout 15 times(1500%). The
20feetand 30feetfromtheantenna. Theconsultantalso points outthatthe petitioneris
results showexposures of 632%, 227.5%andcalculatingthe power densityinfront ofthe
101.1% ofthe MPE.antennaswhichare 44feetintheair,instead of
wherepeoplemightbe present suchasat
groundlevel orin nearby buildings
(AttachmentL). Theapplicantattemptedto
contactthe petitioner, providingadditional
technical specificationsonthe T-Mobilecell
facility, but has notbeenabletomeetwiththe
petitioner(AttachmentM).
Toremoveany doubtastotheaccuracyofthe
consultant’sRFenergyanalysis,theCityhas
alsoconditionedtheapprovaltorequire post-
constructionRFmonitoringtomakecertainthe
RFenergyexposuresarewithinfederal
standards.
2.An offer ofrelevantevidencewhichwasimproperlyexcluded at anypriorCityhearing:
Finding: Thepetitionerhas offered no newrelevantevidencethatwasexcludedatany priorCity
meeting, norhas petitioner proventhatanyevidencewaspreviouslyexcludedbytheCity
Council. Thecomplaintisan opinion ofthe petitionerthat has not been supportedbyanyfacts
orevidence.
PetitionResponse
The petitionerallegesthat hisanalysisThe petitionerclaimedattheNov. 29, 2010
presentedattheNov. 29, 2010 meeting
meeting,that hisanalysis ofthecalculated
indicatesthatradiofrequency(RF)energyenergylevelsat 12 feetfromtheantennaswas
exposurewasmorethan6times higherthan
morethan sixtimeswhatwasallowedbythe
approvedgovernmentlevels. The petitionerfederal standard. The petitioner did not offera
furtherallegesthattheCouncil voted on this
copyoftheanalysistotheCouncil or staff.
projectwithoutcheckingtheseclaimsthattheAfterthehearing, staffrequestedthatthe
RFenergyexposurewashigherthanapprovedpetitioner provide hisanalysisforthe public
governmentlevels.record;thepetitioner did not provideany
analysistotheCity(AttachmentJ) until 49
237
daysafter hisreconsideration petitionwas
filed,and 5 days beforethereconsideration
hearing(AttachmentK). TheCityCouncilcan
onlyact on thefactsandevidence on hand
whenits decisionisrendered.
TheCity hasrelied on areputablefirm,
Hammett& Edison,to preparetheRFenergy
analysis.Hammett& Edison haveclarified
thattheRFenergyatthis siteiswellwithinthe
federal safety standardsatalevel of 0.0012
milliwatt percentimetersquaredforallground
levelexposures,and 0.0022milliwatt per
centimeter squaredfor secondfloorexposures
ofany nearbyresidence.
Toremoveany doubtastotheaccuracyofthe
consultant’sRFenergyanalysis,theCityhas
alsoconditionedtheapprovaltorequire post-
constructionRFmonitoringtomakecertainthe
RFenergyexposuresarewithinfederal
standards.
4.Proof offactswhichdemonstratethattheCityCouncilfailedtoprovide a fairhearing:
Finding: Thepetitionerhas not providedany proof offactsthat demonstratetheCouncilfailed
to provideafairhearing. To thecontrary,areview ofthe hearing on November 29, 2010 shows
thattheCouncil heardlengthytestimonyfromthe petitionerand neighborhoodresidents,aswell
asinformation presented by staffandtheapplicant. TheCouncilasked questionsandreceived
responses beforedeliberating on the project.
PetitionResponse
The petitionerallegesthattheCity did not
Sincethis project has been heardby boththe
provideafair hearing becausetheCommunityPlanningCommissionandtheCityCouncil,
DevelopmentDirector did notconvenea public
anyalleged processingflawattheDirector
designreviewhearing beforeactingtoapprovelevel has been overcomeatthis point.At both
theapplication.
thePlanningCommissionandCityCouncil
hearings,the petitionerhas had opportunitiesto
reviewandinfluencethedesign ofthewireless
facility. TheDirector’sapproachwas not
based on a determinationthattheitemwould
not becontroversial;rather,theDirector
determinedthatthe placement ofthewireless
equipment on anexisting utility pole
constitutedaminor designchangetothe
238
appearance ofthe pole.TheCity’sadopted
WirelessFacilities MasterPlanindicatesthat
theDirector’sapprovalisthe proper processing
optionfor suchafacilitydesign.
5.Proof offactswhichdemonstratethattheCityCouncil abuseditsdiscretionby:
b)Rendering a decisionwhichwasnot supportedbyfindingsoffact; and/or
c)Rendering a decisioninwhichthefindingsoffactwerenot supportedbytheevidence.
Finding: Thepetitionerhas not providedany proof offactsthat demonstratetheCouncilabused
its discretionbyrenderingadecisionwhichwasnot supportedbyfindingsoffact, orrenderinga
decisioninwhichthefindings offactwere not supportedbytheevidence.
PetitionResponse
The petitionerallegesthattheCityCouncilThereis no requirementthatthe best solution
neverreviewedalternativecell site optionsthatbefound, onlythata projectis determined
providea better solutiontoall parties. Theappropriate. TheCity’sWirelessFacilities
petitionerallegesthatanalternative solutionMasterPlanexpressesadesign preferencethat
involvingatallertowerinamoreremotewirelessfacilitiesinresidentialareas be sited
locationwould providebettercoverageandonexisting utilitytowersand poles,ratherthan
collocation“savings”andresultina differentbuilding new structures.Thusthe proposed
decision.sitemeetstherequirements oftheCity’s
WirelessFacilities MasterPlan. TheCity
Council did discussthreealternative sitesinits
deliberations on Nov. 29, 2010.One sitewas
LindaVistaPark on a hill. This parkwas
estimatedto beabout ¾ofamileawayand
wasfeltto betoofarawayto providegood
coveragetotheBubbRoadarea. Thesecond
suggestedalternative sitewasthe proposed
AT&TmonopineatResultsWaywhich had
the potentialto serveanothercarrieratalower
height on the pole.Itwasinappropriateto
considertheResultsWay siteasanalternative
because no decision on the projectappeal had
beengrantedbyNov. 29, 2010. TheCouncil
knewthattheAT&Tmonopinewas 19 feet
lowerthanthegroundtothe south, so anyT-
Mobilecollocatedantennas(at 46 feet,
effectively 27 feet)would be similartotwo
nearby T-Mobilefacilitiesandtoolowin
heightandtoofaraway(1+mile)to provide
cellcoverageto southernBubbRoad.
Thethird sitealternativesiteconsideredbythe
239
CouncilwastheSanJoseWaterCompany
water storagefacilityatRegnartRoadand
LindyLane. Thisfacilityisacoveredearthen
reservoir.Staffindicatedthatthe structure
lacked heightandamonopolewould haveto
be built. TheCityCouncilrejectedtheconcept
oferectinga new,tallmonopolecell siteatthe
edge ofthereservoir nexttotheexisting
houses.
Thisclaimisimmaterialtoanybasisfor
The petitionerallegesthat T-Mobilecould not
provideanyinformationaboutthe number ofreconsideration.Also,the 1996
subscribersthatwould benefitfromtheTelecommunicationsAct, section
proposedwirelessfacility. TheCouncil704(7)(B)(i)(I)prohibitsanylocal decision-
renderedadecision on thisfacilitywithoutmakingagencyfrom unreasonably
knowingiftherewasany public benefit.discriminatingamong providers offunctionally
equivalent(personalwireless) services.
The petitionerallegesthat hisanalysisSeeCityResponsetoPetitioner’sclaim under
presentedattheNov. 29, 2010 meetingMunicipalCode section 2.08.096(B)(1)and
indicatesthatradiofrequency(RF)energy(B)(2).
exposurewasmorethan6times higherthan
approvedgovernmentlevels. The petitioner
furtherallegesthattheCouncil voted on this
projectwithoutcheckingtheseclaimsthatthe
RFenergyexposurewashigherthanapproved
governmentlevels.
AT&Tacquisition ofT-Mobile announcement
The petitionerShaulBerger hasemailedtheCityregardedtheannouncedacquisition of T-
MobilebyAT&T. Thepetitioner believestheacquisitionwill havefar-reachingimplicationsfor
th
wirelesscoverageinCupertinoandthatallactivity,includingtheApril 5reconsideration
hearingforfile no. DIR-2010-28 should be put on hold untilthecompaniesfigure outtheir
combined plans(AttachmentN).
Therehave been pressreportsthatAT&Tis planning on acquiringT-Mobile.Staff has
contactedAT&Tandwasinformedthatthemergerwill nottake placeforatleast 12 months.In
fact,the plannedacquisitionis subjecttofederalregulatoryapprovalandwill not occurfor quite
sometime,ifatall.Atthistime,theCityCouncilmay notconsiderthe potentialacquisitionas
groundsfor denialoftheproject. Thetwocellularsystemsarecurrently separate.Unlessthe
applicantwithdrawsherapplication,theCityCouncil should proceedwiththereconsideration
hearing.Legally,theCitymay notconsiderthis possible businesstransactionas part ofthe
requestforreconsideration ofthecellfacility siting.Also,the possible sale of T-Mobileto
AT&T does notconstitute grounds underthereconsideration ordinance.
____________________________________
240
Preparedby:ColinJung,AICP,SeniorPlanner
Reviewedby:GaryChao,CityPlanner;AartiShrivastava,CommunityDevelopmentDirector
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachments:
A.CityCouncilResolutionNo.______and Exhibit 1
B.Director’s Minor ModificationApproval datedSept. 7, 2010
C.AppealbyShaulBerger datedSept. 20, 2010
D.PlanningCommissionStaffReport datedNov. 9, 2010
E.PlanningCommission Meeting Minutes ofNov. 9, 2010
F.PlanningCommissionResolutionNo. 6616
G.CityCouncilStaffReport datedNov. 29, 2010
H.CityCouncil MeetingAction Minutes ofNov.29, 2010
I.PetitionforReconsiderationfiledDec. 9, 2010
J. EmailfromShaulBergertoCity staffdatedNov. 30, 2010
K. EmailfromShaulBergerregardingradiationanalysis ofT-Mobile
Antenna proposaldatedJan. 27, 2011.
L.ResponsetoPetitioner’sRadiationAnalysis preparedbyHammett& Edison,Inc.
DatedJanuary 31, 2011.
M. Emailfrom MarkNeumann ofHammett&EdisontoShaulBergerregarding ERP
calculations datedFeb. 11, 2011, andemailfrom MarkNeumannofHammett&
EdisontoColinJungregardinglack ofresponsefromShaulBerger datedFeb. 25,
2011
N. EmailfromShaulBerger datedMarch 21, 2011
O.ApprovedPlanSet
241
RESOLUTIONNO.
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
DENYING THEPETITIONOFSHAULBERGERSEEKINGCOUNCIL
RECONSIDERATIONOFITSDECISION TODENYANAPPEALOFDIR-2010-28,A
DIRECTOR’SMINOR MODIFICATIONTOALLOWAPERSONALWIRELESSSERVICE
FACILITYONANEXISTINGPG&EPOLEAT 11371 BUBBROAD
WHEREAS, on November 29, 2010, theCupertinoCityCouncilreceiveda staffreportand
recommendationto denyanappeal ofaDirector’s Minor Modificationapproval ofa T-Mobile
personalwireless servicefacilityproposed on anexistingPG&E poleat 11371 BubbRoad.
WHEREAS,theCupertinoCityCouncil helda public hearingandattheconclusion ofthe
hearing deniedtheappealfiledbyShaulBergerona 3-2 voteatitsmeeting ofNovember 29,
2010,thusapprovingtheproject,DIR-2010-28,inaccordancewithPlanningCommission
ResolutionNo. 6616.
WHEREAS,theCupertinoCityCouncil'sdecisionwaswithinits discretionandmadeat
a properly noticed publicmeeting.
WHEREAS,ShaulBergerrequestedthattheCityCouncilreconsiderits decision underthe
provisions ofSection 2.08.096 oftheCity'smunicipalcode;and
WHEREAS,theCityCouncil hasconsideredallrelevantevidencepresentedbythe
partiesatall hearings,includingevidencepresentedattheApril 5, 2011 reconsideration
hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE,ITISHEREBYRESOLVEDASFOLLOWS:
1.The petitioners'ReconsiderationPetitionis defective on itsfaceinthatit does not offer
proof offactsasrequiredby MunicipalCodeSection 2.08.096.
2.The petitioners did not provide newrelevantevidencewhichintheexercise ofreasonable
diligence,could not have been producedatanyearliercity hearing(SeeMunicipalCode
§ 2.08.096B(1).) Evidence presented did notincontrovertibly provethatfederallaws
regardingmaximumlevels ofradiofrequencyenergyexposurewould be violated. The
Cityhasrequired post-constructionradiofrequencyenergymonitoringtoinsure
compliancewithfederallaw.
3.TheCityCouncil did notexcludeanyevidence presentedbythe petitionersatany prior
city hearing.(See MunicipalCode § 2.08.096B(2).)
4.The petitioners havefailedto presentanyevidencethattheCityCouncilfailedto provide
afairhearing.(See MunicipalCode § 2.08.096B(4).)
242
5.The petitioners havefailedto demonstratethattheCityCouncilabusedits discretion
by denyingtheappeal ofaDirector’sapproval(file no. DIR-2010-28) ofapersonal
wireless servicefacilityonanexistingPG&E polelocatedat 11371BubbRoad.(See
MunicipalCode § 2.08.096B(5).)Specifically,theCityCouncil determinesthat:
a.TheCityCouncil'sdecisionis supportedbyfindings offactattachedas Exhibit 1.
b.ThefindingsoffactrelatedtotheCityCouncil'sdecisionwere supportedby
substantialevidenceintherecord of proceedings.
6.The petitioners'PetitionforReconsideration oftheCityCouncil's decision ofNovember
29, 2010 on item __ isDENIED,therebyaffirmingthe originaldecision.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeeting oftheCityCouncil oftheCity of
th
Cupertinothis 5 dayofApril 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
___________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
243
EXHIBIT 1
CITYCOUNCILFINDINGS INRESPONSETOPETITIONFORRECONSIDERATION
Cupertino MunicipalCode section 2.08.096 states:
“A petitionforreconsideration shall specifyin detaileachandeverygroundforreconsideration.
Failureofa petitionto specifyanyparticularground or groundsforreconsideration precludes
that particular omittedground or groundsfrom beingraised orlitigatedinasubsequentjudicial
proceeding.
The groundsforreconsiderationarelimitedtothefollowing:
1)An offer of newrelevantevidencewhich,intheexercise ofreasonable diligence,could
not have beenproducedatanyearliercityhearing.
2)An offer ofrelevantevidencewhichwasimproperlyexcludedatany priorcity hearing.
3)Proof offactswhich demonstratethattheCityCouncil proceededwithout, orinexcess of
itsjurisdiction.
4)Proof offactswhich demonstratethattheCityCouncilfailedto provideafair hearing.
5)Proof offactswhich demonstratethattheCityCouncilabusedits discretionby:
a)Not proceedinginamannerrequiredbylaw;and/or
b)Renderinga decisionwhichwas not supportedbyfindings offact;and/or
c)Renderinga decisioninwhichthefindingsoffactwere not supportedbythe
evidence.”
OriginalPetition
The petitionforreconsiderationconsists ofthreepagesaccompaniedbyapetitionwith 31
signatories.Reconsideration ofthisitemconstitutesthethirdfull hearingofthismatter
conductedbytheCity.As statedinthe petition’sintroductoryparagraphs,the petitioner has
madeclaimsforreconsideration undertheabovereferencedcriteria #2, #4,#5band #5c. The
petitioner submitted hisradiationanalysis on January 27, 2011, 49 daysafterthe
reconsideration petitionwasfiled on December9, 2010. Theanalysisisaclaimfor
reconsideration underreferencedcriteria #1. TheCity’sfindingsoffact on each ofthese
criteriaaresetforth below.
1.An offer ofnewrelevantevidencewhich,intheexercise ofreasonablediligence,couldnot
havebeenproduced at anyearliercityhearing.
Finding: Theoffer of newrelevantevidencebythe petitionercould havebeen presentedat
theCityCouncilappealhearing ofNovember 29,2010 orwiththereconsideration petition
submitted on December9, 2010, instead of 49 dayslater on January 27, 2011.
PetitionResponse
Inthepetitioner’sanalysis of powerTheapplicant’sradiofrequencyenergy
density,assumptionsaremadeabouttheconsultantfindsthe petitioner’smethodology
T-mobileequipmentandpower densityisandcalculationsto bereasonable,exceptfor
calculatedasa percentage ofthe Maximumanerrorin usingtheproposed output power
244
Permissible Exposure(MPE)allowedbyfromtheantennaastheoutput powerfromthe
transmitter,whichaccordingtotheconsultant
theFederalGovernmentfor uncontrolled
environments(1milliwatt percentimetermakesall ofthe petitioner’sresultstoo high
squared) Therearethree pagescalculatingbyafactor ofabout 15 times(1500%). The
power density 12 feet, 20feetand 30feetconsultantalso points outthatthe petitioneris
fromtheantenna. Theresults showcalculatingthe power densityinfront ofthe
exposures of 632%, 227.5%and 101.1% ofantennaswhichare 44feetintheair,instead
the MPE.ofwhere peoplemight be present suchasat
groundlevel orin nearby buildings. The
applicantattemptedtocontactthe petitioner,
providingadditionaltechnical specifications
onthe T-Mobilecellfacility, buthas not been
abletomeetwiththe petitioner.
Toremoveany doubtastotheaccuracyofthe
consultant’sRFenergyanalysis,theCityhas
alsoconditionedtheapprovaltorequire post-
constructionRFmonitoringtomakecertain
theRFenergyexposuresarewithinfederal
standards.
2.An offer ofrelevantevidencewhichwasimproperlyexcluded at anypriorCityhearing:
Finding: Thepetitionerhas offered no newrelevantevidencethatwasexcludedatany priorCity
meeting, norhas petitioner proventhatanyevidencewaspreviouslyexcludedbytheCity
Council. Thecomplaintisan opinion ofthe petitionerthat has not been supportedbyanyfacts
orevidence.
PetitionResponse
The petitionerallegesthat hisanalysisThe petitionerclaimedattheNov. 29, 2010
presentedattheNov. 29, 2010 meetingmeeting,that hisanalysis ofthecalculated
indicatesthatradiofrequency(RF)energyenergylevelsat 12 feetfromtheantennaswas
exposurewasmorethan6times higherthanmorethan sixtimeswhatwasallowedbythe
approvedgovernmentlevels. The petitionerfederal standard. The petitioner did not offera
furtherallegesthattheCouncil voted on thiscopyoftheanalysistotheCouncil or staff.
projectwithoutcheckingtheseclaimsthattheAfterthehearing, staffrequestedthatthe
RFenergyexposurewashigherthanapprovedpetitioner provide hisanalysisforthe public
governmentlevels.record;thepetitioner did not provideany
analysistotheCity until 49 daysafterhis
reconsideration petitionwasfiled,and 5 days
beforethereconsideration hearing. TheCity
Councilcan onlyact on thefactsandevidence
on handwhenits decisionisrendered.
TheCity hasrelied on areputablefirm,
245
Hammett& Edison,to preparetheRFenergy
analysis.Hammett& Edison haveclarified
thattheRFenergyatthis siteiswellwithin
thefederal safety standardsatalevel of
0.0012milliwatt percentimeter squaredforall
groundlevelexposures,and 0.0022 milliwatt
percentimeter squaredfor secondfloor
exposures ofany nearbyresidence.
Toremoveany doubtastotheaccuracyofthe
consultant’sRFenergyanalysis,theCityhas
alsoconditionedtheapprovaltorequire post-
constructionRFmonitoringtomakecertain
theRFenergyexposuresarewithinfederal
standards.
4.Proof offactswhichdemonstratethattheCityCouncilfailedtoprovide a fairhearing:
Finding: Thepetitionerhas not providedany proof offactsthat demonstratetheCouncilfailed
to provideafairhearing. To thecontrary,areview ofthe hearing on November 29, 2010 shows
thattheCouncil heardlengthytestimonyfromthe petitionerand neighborhoodresidents,aswell
asinformation presented by staffandtheapplicant. TheCouncilasked questionsandreceived
responses beforedeliberating on the project.
PetitionResponse
The petitionerallegesthattheCity did notSincethis project has been heardby boththe
provideafair hearing becausetheCommunityPlanningCommissionandtheCityCouncil,
DevelopmentDirector did notconvenea publicanyalleged processingflawattheDirector
designreviewhearing beforeactingtoapprovelevel has been overcomeatthis point.At both
theapplication.thePlanningCommissionandCityCouncil
hearings,the petitionerhas had opportunities
toreviewandinfluencethe design ofthe
wirelessfacility. TheDirector’sapproachwas
not based on a determinationthattheitem
would not becontroversial;rather,the
Directordeterminedthatthe placement ofthe
wirelessequipment on anexisting utility pole
constitutedaminor designchangetothe
appearance ofthe pole.TheCity’sadopted
WirelessFacilities MasterPlanindicatesthat
theDirector’sapprovalisthe proper
processing optionfor suchafacility design.
5.Proof offactswhichdemonstratethattheCityCouncil abuseditsdiscretionby:
246
b)Rendering a decisionwhichwasnot supportedbyfindingsoffact; and/or
c)Rendering a decisioninwhichthefindingsoffactwerenot supportedbythe
evidence.
Finding: Thepetitionerhas not providedany proof offactsthat demonstratetheCouncilabused
its discretionbyrenderingadecisionwhichwasnot supportedbyfindingsoffact, orrenderinga
decisioninwhichthefindings offactwere not supportedbytheevidence.
PetitionResponse
The petitionerallegesthattheCityCouncilThereis no requirementthatthe best solution
neverreviewedalternativecell site optionsthatbefound, onlythata projectis determined
providea better solutiontoall parties. Theappropriate. TheCity’sWirelessFacilities
petitionerallegesthatanalternative solutionMasterPlanexpressesadesign preferencethat
involvingatallertowerinamoreremotewirelessfacilitiesinresidentialareas be sited
locationwould providebettercoverageandonexisting utilitytowersand poles,rather
collocation“savings”andresultina differentthan building new structures. Thus the
decision.proposed sitemeetstherequirements ofthe
City’sWirelessFacilities MasterPlan. The
CityCouncil did discussthreealternative sites
inits deliberations on November 29, 2010.
One sitewasLindaVistaPark on a hill. This
parkwasestimatedto beabout ¾ ofamile
awayandwasfeltto betoofarawayto
provide good coveragetotheBubbRoadarea.
The second suggestedalternativewasthe
proposedAT&TmonopineatResultsWay
which hadthe potentialto serveanother
carrieratalowerheightonthe pole.Itwas
inappropriatetoconsidertheResultsWay site
asanalternative becauseno decision on the
projectappeal had beengrantedbyNov. 29,
2010. TheCouncil knewthattheAT&T
monopinewas 19 feetlowerthantheground
tothe south, so any T-Mobilecollocated
antennas(at 46 feet,effectively 27 feet)
would be similartotwo nearby T-Mobile
facilitiesandtoolowin heightandtoofar
away(1+mile)to providecellcoverageto
southernBubbRoad.
Thethird sitealternativeconsideredbythe
CouncilwastheSanJoseWaterCompany
water storagefacilityatRegnartRoadand
LindyLane. Thisfacilityisacoveredearthen
reservoir.Staffindicatedthatthe structure
247
lacked heightandamonopolewould haveto
be built. TheCityCouncilrejectedthe
concept oferectinga new,tallmonopolecell
siteattheedge ofthereservoir nexttothe
existing houses.
Thisclaimisimmaterialtoanybasisfor
The petitionerallegesthat T-Mobilecould not
provideanyinformationaboutthe number ofreconsideration.Also,the 1996
subscribersthatwould benefitfromtheTelecommunicationsAct, section
proposedwirelessfacility. TheCouncil704(7)(B)(i)(I)prohibitsanylocal decision-
renderedadecision on thisfacilitywithoutmakingagencyfrom unreasonably
knowingiftherewasany public benefit.discriminatingamong providers of
functionallyequivalent(personalwireless)
services.
SeeCityResponsetoPetitioner’sclaim under
The petitionerallegesthat hisanalysis
presentedattheNov. 29, 2010 meetingMunicipalCode section 2.08.096(B)(1)and
indicatesthatradiofrequency(RF)energy(B)(2).
exposurewasmorethan6times higherthan
approvedgovernmentlevels. The petitioner
furtherallegesthattheCouncil voted on this
projectwithoutcheckingtheseclaimsthatthe
RFenergyexposurewashigherthanapproved
governmentlevels.
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
CITY HALL
10 CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3212 www.cupertino.org
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting: April 5, 2011
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Consider accepting a Department of Energy grant for a Coulomb Technologies, Inc. electric
vehicle charging station, and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the necessary
agreements with Coulomb Technologies, Inc., and REJ Electric Company for installation of a
charging station at City Hall in substantially the same form as attached
BACKGROUND
In seeking strategies to reduce emissions and enhance future savings, staff identified the
reinstallation of a plug-in electric vehicle charging station as critical infrastructure to enable the
city to once again acquire and use electric vehicles as part of its fleet.
Coulomb Technologies, deploys charging stations in municipalities,
utilities, office buildings and parking garages. The company is creating a network of electric
vehicle charging stations, accessible to all plug-in drivers through a single use or monthly
subscription model. Supported by Department of Energy funding to deploy and collect data
among 4600 stations in nine metro areas, Coulomb has offered to make the infrastructure
available in Cupertino for resident and business vehicles, as well as the city fleet, at no cost to
the City. These stations are currently located in 13 other Bay Area jurisdictions including the
Cities of San Jose, South San Francisco, San Francisco, Los Altos Hills and Counties of
Alameda and Sonoma, though numerous stations have been installed by other vendors in
neighboring jurisdictions including Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, Santa Clara and
1
Campbell
TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY
The technology proposed for the City of Cupertino is a 7.2kW
output Level II 208/240V @ 30A) dual output station (CT2100
see Attachment A) charging
connector and fixed 18-foot cable designed for public outdoor
applications.
electric vehicle supply equipment, in that it allows for a faster battery charge of 4 to 6 hours
(depending on the EV, battery type and capacity) due to a higher voltage (over Level I 120V
2
AC). The charging station requires 220V 40A and 110V 20A on separate circuits and will
consist of installing new, dedicated branch circuits from the central meter distribution panel to
1
Electric vehicle charging station locations information obtained on March 25, 2010 through www.evchargermaps.com
2
Additional information on charging levels are described in these Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Deployment
Guidelines: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/OIPP/docs/EVDeployGuidelines3-1.pdf?ga=t
303
April 5, 2011 Page 2
the charging station. Proximity to the electrical service is an important factor in locating this
parking area, as the length of the circuit run and the number of stalls will have a significant
impact on the installation cost for the City. Additional charging station features are included in
Attachment A & B and include:
1. Smart Card Reader: -based RFID reader accepts
(integrated circuit card) or other contactless credit cards, with
capacity to provide indentification, authentication, data storage and application processing.
The reader can also provide optional driver billing and custom access control, preventing
electricity theft and enhancing safety.
2. Software Features: Software features are outlined in Attachment B including network
operation service, driver telephone support, station manager software application, flex billing
manager software application and flex billing service.
3. Station Manager: The Station Manager provides access to usage, energy consumed, station
availability and\\ greenhouse gas (GHG) trends for each charging station. Data can be
exported and combined with data from other systems to track costs, calculate savings and
monitor efficiencies of the electric vehicle charging system.
FISCAL IMPACT
The smart charging infrastructure for plug-in electric vehicle, valued at $6,555 will be donated
by Coulomb Technologies, through its Department of Energy (DOE) ARRA Grant (Attachment
C and D). The installation cost to the city will be covered by a
California Energy Commission Grant for $1,750, which will include
wiring installation ($450), concrete base ($300) and final assembly
($1,000) and $600 for a parking bollard to protect the equipment, for a
total project grant of $2,350 (see Attachment E). Ongoing subscription
costs are established through the Agreement with Coulomb
Technologies and are paid buy the user. The City will receive a free
subscription to the network through December 31, 2013, when
(Attachment F). -per-
use features to establish parking service rates (termed session fee pricing, per Attachment F) that
vary by day, time of day and individual customer. This allows billing to reflect PG&E rate
schedules, including Time of Use rates. All fees are collected automatically and transferred
account. All of these considerations will be subject to negotiations
between Coulomb Technologies and the City. At the close of the free subscription term of
December, 31, 2013, session pricing fees will follow the formula outlined below:
Session Authorization
Session Fee Session Processing Fee
Fee
PG&E A-10 Electric Rate Schedule (A-10 Total Meter Cost x
+ +
2
Total Meter Cost 7.5%)
3
$0.5
Currently: (($0.16013kwh)
4
Currently: $0.16013/kwh
2
x 7.5%)
3
Based on the following Subscriber Session Transaction Fee Schedule dated July 7, 2010 (Attachment F).
4
Based on PG&E Commercial Service Electrical Rates (A-10 Schedule) accessed March 25, 2011 through:
http://www.pge.com/tariffs/CommlOnlyA-10Current.xls
304
April 5, 2011Page 3
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
1.Limiting Parking Disruption: As a means to minimize parking disruptions in the Civic
Center Parking Lot, staff will implement the following actions:
5 minute Loading & Charging Zone To accommodate the need for additional loading
spaces for Public Works and other facility guests, staff proposes to designate the space for
both Loading and EV Charging. This is supported by the Public Works team including the
new EV charging service.
Electric vehicle as part of the vehicle replacement schedule, described in further detail in
item 9 below, staff propose to replace a conventional pool vehicle with an electric vehicle,
which will in turn charge in the designated Loading & Charging space, as described above.
This will free an additional parking space during the time while the vehicle is charging and
also when it is being utilized by staff.
Pool vehicle staff are evaluating the opportunity toshift one pool vehicle that has minimal
usage, likely the pool van, currently parked in the Civic Center Parking Lot to the
Corporation Yard. This will create an additional space not currently available to the
general public.
2.Code Requirements: As with any electrical installation, EV charging infrastructure is
service territory, the National Electrical Code (NEC), the California Electrical Code (CEC),
and the California Building Code (CBC) are standards for local jurisdictions to follow to
ensure the safe operation of equipment. Also, in an effort to create an opportunity for
residents to install electric vehicle charging systems, the City, through its involvement in the
Bay Area Climate Collaborative, is evaluating the guidelines developed by the Tri-chapter
Uniform Code Committee to enhance regional consistence in application and enforcement of
the Building Code, as it relates to electric vehicle charging infrastructure
3.Permitting: Staff confirmed that the installation of electric vehicle charging stations will
require an electrical permit, issued through the building department. Also depending on the
scenario, Public Works may require an encroachment permit to allow construction in the
public right-of-way. As part of this project, staff reviewed electrical permit fees of adjacent
part of the FY2011/2012 Budget, should consider establishing a special commercial electric
vehicle charging station permit fee that both incentivizes this installation and avoids issues
similar to that encountered with commercial solar photovoltaic permitfees. It should also be
noted that as a means to create a regionally consistent permitting process for charging
stations, staff are participating in a Bay Area Climate Collaborative-convened working group
to evaluate EV fleet opportunities and streamline EV infrastructure permitting for public,
residential and commercial installations.
4.Siting: To minimize installation costs, while minimizing disruptions among Library patrons,
staff propose the electric vehicle charging station be installed in the City Hall Parking Lot
where wiring and conduits exist from the previous RAV-4 charging station, as highlighted in
the image below. This recommendation was confirmed and approved by both the Ci
Transportation Engineer and proposed installer, REJ Electric. Alternative locations at City
305
April 5, 2011 Page 4
Hall would result in a minimum increase of $60/linear foot for prevailing wage-based labor
and materials, though not including additional costs for renting and operating boring
equipment to access the site (estimated to exceed $5,000).
In addition, siting requirements for publicly available charging expand beyond those for
public fleets, in order to address questions of ownership, vandalism, payment for use,
maintenance, and data collection. Though most of these considerations will be addressed in
Technologies (Attachment F), staff are reviewing
mounting options (bollard, pole, wall) to ensure the charging stations accommodate (1)
public safety (2) ease of access and (3) EV owner access to alternative activities during
charge time.
5. Parking and Signage: Despite the fact that the City had
previously designated spaces for electric vehicle charging at City
Hall
include specific language related to parking or signage for electric
vehicle charging. Opportunities to incorporate this language
include Chapter 11.24: Stopping, Standing and Parking Public
Streets and Chapter 11.31: Regulation of Parking on Property
Owned by the City, which will be reviewed staff in consult with
This team will also evaluate signage
to serve two unique purposes: (1) to keep non-EV vehicles from
parking in charging station spots and (2) to help EV drivers locate charging stations, as
depicted on the right.
6. Utility: The City, supported by Coulomb, will work with PG&E to determine requirements
for a special or second meter to accommodate the project. Though beneficial to electric
vehicle charging pricing, the transition to a demand-based Time of Use (TOU)schedule will
not considered at this time, as it was under review as part of a proposed solar power purchase
agreement project which will not be advanced.
306
April 5, 2011 Page 5
7. Demand for Charging Infrastructure: As cited in a 2009 University of California,
Berkeley Technical Brief conducted by the Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology,
improvements in both lithium-ion battery technology and hybrid automobiles over the past
twenty years have made possible the design of superior performance electric vehicles to their
gasoline vehicle counterparts. Spurred by these breakthroughs, vehicle manufacturers have
indicated their intention to begin mass producing electric vehicles within the next .five years
to dramatically increase the number of electric vehicles on U.S. roads, which are currently in
the thousands
Specific projections referenced in this brief note that
for 64% of U.S. light-vehicle sales by 2030 and comprise 24% of the U.S. light-vehicle
fleet. These rates of adoption will be driven by the low purchase price and operating costs of
electric cars with separate battery ownership or battery leasing. The estimates include the
cost of installing charging and battery switching infrastructure to extend the range of electric
5
vehicles. However, due to policies enacted (i.e. ease of permitting requirements for EV
charging equipment, retail sales and use tax exemptions for EV batteries and infrastructure)
and infrastructure installed to encourage accelerated deployment of transportation
alternatives, adoption of electric vehicles is anticipate to first occur among West Coast states.
For example, By 2020, 700,000 of the 2.7 million electric cars sold in the United States,
comprising 17% of 2020 new light-vehicle sales, are forecast to be sold in the four West
Coast States.
6
EVs are approximately three times more energy-efficient than gasoline vehicles. As a
vehicle fuel, electricity offers the additional advantage of price stability. EVs can operate for
as little as 2 cents per mile when charged overnight using off-peak power, when compared to
a gasoline vehicles which cost of 20 cents per mile (rated at 20mpg, gasoline cost $4/gallon).
By charging batteries during off-peak hours, EV owners can minimize their energy bills and
also make more efficient use of utility power plants, which in turn can reduce the average
cost of electricity for all customers.
8. Electric Fleet Vehicles: Per the
Policy Section as part of the vehicle replacement schedule,
the City will identify and consider less-polluting alternatives such as compressed natural gas,
bio-based fuels, hybrids, electric batteries, fuel cells as available. To achieve this goal, staff
will initiate a new standard practice as part of the vehicle replacement schedule to fully
evaluate vehicle alternatives, per Section 3.7.8, as a means to further advance the goals
outlined in Section
short and long-term costs in comparing alternatives. This new practice is to include
evaluation of total costs expected during the period of ownership including, but not limited
to, acquisition, extended warranties, operations, supplies, maintenance, disposal costs and
Here staff will take into consideration
federal and state tax rebates and grants available to offset the cost to procure alternative fuel
vehicles (vs. conventional models).
5
011 at http://cet.berkeley.edu/dl/CET_Technical%20Brief_EconomicModel2030_f.pdf.
6
at: http://www.pge.com/about/environment/pge/electricvehicles/fuelrates/index.shtml .
307
April 5, 2011Page 6
SUSTAINBILITY IMPACT
As referenced above,a transition toelectric vehicleswill offer economic and environmental
benefits,costingabout 2cents per mile to operate, compared to 20cents per mile for a
conventional car, based on gas at $4per gallon(consistent with fuel prices on March 5, 2011), all
the while emitting no tailpipe pollutants and requiring no fluids to lubricate moving parts (i.e.
engine oil, anti-freeze, transmission fluid). Most EVs charge up at night when system wide
demand for electricity is low, tapping into existing generating capacity that is not fully used
rather than increasing demand for new capacity. For example, the battery of a Nissan leaf,with a
100-mile range, can be charged to 80 percent capacity in 30 minutes with a quick charger or fully
charged from a 220-volt home outlet in eight hours. If this charging is performed overnight the
vehicle owner in PG&E territory could save upwards of $0.23/kwh if charging in off peak vs.
7
peak hours.
greenhouse gas emissions by 22% and plug-in hybrids reduce emissions by 36%. Night time
charging may furtherreduce emissions by 46 61%. Electric Power Research Institute and a
Natural Resource Defense Council study noted that plug-in electric vehicle (PHEVs) will
actually get cleaner as they get older, because the (domestic) power grid that supports these
vehicles is, and will continue to, getting cleaner. Though plug-in electric vehicles (PHEVs) are
increasing penetration among the 247 million registeredconventional passenger vehicles in the
United States, most PHEV owners do not have a way to charge theirvehicle once they leave
their home. Addressing this gap in alternative transportation infrastructure will,in coordination
with Coulomb Technologies,enable existing PHEV owners to access the resources required for
mobility and eliminatethe barriers to market entry for new and emerging electric vehicle
technology companies. .
Furthermore, incentivizing the development of this marketplace will provide the city means to
achieve its Bay Area Climate Compact Goals to:
Incentivize and encourage transportation mode-shifts, such as networked work stations,
bicycling and public transit, to reduce 2008 baseline gasoline consumption 3% by the end of
2013, and 8% by the end of 2018.
Increase the number of zero emission and other advance ultra-low emission light duty
vehicles to 10% of municipal fleets by the end of 2013, and to 25% by the end of 2018.
TIMELINE
Coulomb is looking to complete all charging station allocations by the close of the year, with the
intent to deploy the installation of all public charging stations by September 2011.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Consider accepting a Department of Energy grant for a Coulomb Technologies, Inc. electric
vehicle charging station, and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the necessary
agreements with Coulomb Technologies, Inc., and REJ Electric Company for installation of a
charging station at City Hall in substantially the same form as attached
7
Information obtained on Pacific Gas &
at:http://www.pge.com/about/environment/pge/electricvehicles/fuelrates/index.shtml
308
April 5, 2011 Page 7
Prepared by: Erin Cooke, Environmental Affairs Coordinator
Reviewed by: Rick Kitson, Director of Public and Environmental Affairs
Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager
Attachments:
Attachment A: ChargePoint Networked Charging Stations CT2100 Family
Attachment B: ChargePoint Network Standard Service
Attachment C: Coulomb Technologies, ChargePoint America Grant Award
Attachment D: Coulomb Technologies, ChargePoint America Installation and Reporting
Compliance Guide
Attachment E: REJ Electric Company, City Hall Electric Car Charger Proposal
Attachment F: Coulomb Technologies, ChargePoint Master Services Subscription Agreement
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
Congratulations! Your organization has been awarded one or more Coulomb
Technologies, Inc. electric vehicle charging station(s) under the ChargePoint Am
Program. The Program has been funded in part under the terms of Grant number DE-
EE0003391 from the United States Department of Energy as part of the American
Reinvestment and Recovery Act. In order to receive delivery of the Charging Station(s),
you must agree to all of the terms and conditions following. Furthermore, you need to:
1. Countersign at the end of this letter and provide a copy of it back to Coulomb or
to the local Coulomb distributor.
2. Provide a $0 PO to Coulomb Technology for the charging station(s). Please
make sure the part numbers on the order correspond to the part numbers on this
letter and you provide a requested shipment date, ship to address with a contact
name, phone number, and email address.
3. Sign and return the attached Master Services Support Agreement.
4. Please familiarize yourself with the Installation and Reporting Guide. Providing
proper documentation of the charger installation to Coulomb is a requirement of
the Grant. Our authorized installers are compliant with the reporting requirements
and can complete the cost documentation reports on your behalf.
5. Return the documents within 30 days of the date of this award letter.
Please note that delivery of the charging systems will be up to 68 weeks of receipt of
PO and associated signed documents. We appreciate your participation in this exciting
program and look forward to creating an electric vehicle charging infrastructure in your
area.
Best regards,
Michael Jones
Western Region Director
ChargePoint America Program
Coulomb Technologies
318
CHARG
1. Charging Stations.
Program .
The Program has been funded in part under the terms of Grant number DE-
will be installed at the locations specified on Appendix A, as amended from time
to time to reflect the award of additional Charging Stations under this Station
Award Agreement.
319
2. Shipment and Delivery. CTI will pay for the cost of standard delivery charges of
the Charging Stations to the locations designated by You in writing to CTI. CTI
shall choose the method by which Charging Stations are to be delivered. If You
desire expedited delivery, You will be responsible for the payment of all delivery
charges.
3. Installation. (a) Installation of the Charging Stations shall be at your sole cost
and expense. Unless specifically agreed in writing, installation of the Charging
Stations may only be performed by a CTI Authorized Installer. Should You wish
discretion, to do so no more than fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled
installation date. You should be aware, certain requirements must be met by all
contractors and subcontractors working to install electric vehicles station
equipment (EVSE) as part of the Grant. The Davis Bacon and Related Acts
(DBRA) requires all contractors and subcontractors performing work on federal
construction contracts or federally assisted contracts to pay their laborers and
mechanics not less than the prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits for
corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on similar projects in
the area. The prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits are determined by the
Secretary of Labor. For the ChargePoint America program, construction includes
all alterations, improvements and/or repair, including painting and decorating,
performed on a site in performance of the installation of EVSE. In the event You
use your own installer, such installer shall become subject to certain audit and
other rights granted to the United States government and to CTI. Also, should
you be authorized to use your own contractor to install the charging stations, the
contractor will be required to submit to CTI or the applicable CTI Distributor within
5 days of the installation, the applicable DBRA related paperwork including (i) a
certified payroll or a properly filled out US government form wh-347 and (ii) an
invoice or receipt for the work done to install the charging station(s) including
costs for panel rework, trenching, concrete pad placement, fixing the station, and
electrical wiring. Furthermore, you shall indemnify and hold harmless CTI from
all costs
charges, fees, fines and other expenses of any sort whatsoever, including,
without limitation, the refusal of the DOE to provide reimbursement to CTI in
respect of the Charging Stations awarded to you, incurred by CTI as a result of
limitation, the Davis-Bacon Act or (ii) failure to provide CTI such documentation
as is reasonably needed by it to comply with applicable DOE requirements. (b)
You agree to cause the installation of the Charging Stations within forty five (45)
days of their delivery to You. In the event that the Charging Stations have not
been installed by the expiration of such forty five day period, CTI reserves the
right to reclaim the Charging Stations. In the event that You are having trouble
arranging for the installation of the Charging Stations by an Authorized Distributor
320
or an installer chosen by such Authorized Distributor, please contact CTI as soon
as possible so that it can assist you in obtaining prompt installation of the
Charging Stations. (c) The Charging Stations are not to be removed from their
packaging by any person other than the Installer.
4. Warranty/Limitation of Liability. (a) Warranty. The Charging Station is
beginning on the date of installation and running until December 31, 2013. A
copy of the Warranty is included with this agreement. All applicable warranties
with respect to the Charging Station are set forth in the Warranty, and are hereby
incorporated by reference into this Agreement. (b) Disclaimer of Warranties.
EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION 4 AND IN THE
WARRANTY, CTI MAKES NO WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PERFORMANCE OF THE CHARGING STATION, THE CHARGEPOINTTM
NETWORK STANDARD SERVICES OR THE CHARGEPOINTTM NETWORK,
WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE. CTI
EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF
THIRD PARTY RIGHTS BY THE CHARGING STATION, MERCHANTABILITY
AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. CTI DOES NOT WARRANT
UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE OPERATION OF THE CHARGING
STATION. (c) Limitation of Liability. (i) REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ANY
REMEDY SET FORTH HEREIN FAILS OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OR
OTHERWISE, IN NO EVENT WILL CTI BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOST REVENUE
OR PROFIT, LOST OR DAMAGED DATA, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS
OF CAPITAL, OR FOR SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL
OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, HOWEVER CAUSED AND REGARDLESS OF THE
THEORY OF LIABILITY OR WHETHER ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR
RVICES, OR OTHERWISE
OR BASED ON ANY EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR CLAIMED WARRANTIES BY
YOU NOT SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THIS ADDENDUM. BECAUSE
SOME STATES OR JURISDICITON DO NOT ALLOW LIMITATION OR
EXCLUSION OF CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, THE ABOVE
LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. (ii) YOUR SOLE REMEDY FOR ANY BREACH
BY CTI OF ITS OBLIGATIONS OR WARRANTIES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT
THE CHARGING STATION. (d) Warranty Exclusions. Exclusive Remedies.
THE REMEDIES CONTAINED IN SECTION 4 ARE YOUR SOLE AND
EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES AND ARE IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER RIGHTS OR
REMEDIES YOU MAY HAVE AGAINST CTI WITH RESPECT TO THE
321
5. Access to the Public. All of the Charging Stations will be installed in a manner
and in locations that make them available for access and use by the general
public. The Charging Stations, and the facilities in which they are located, shall
be kept clean and in good repair. You shall promptly call CTI or an Authorized
Distributor in order to arrange for the repair of any non-functioning Charging
Stations.
6. Network Access. As a part of the award, You will receive a free subscription for
st execute a
copy of the Master Services Agreement as a part of your obligations under this
Subscription Period. CTI offers various other services, such as billing services,
7. Access to Information. In consideration of your receipt of the Charging
agree to provide and release to CTI, the DOE, such other participants and
partners of CTI in the Program as CTI shall determine necessary, all data and
information relating to You, Your electric vehicles, if any, and their use, the use
by others of Your Charging Stations and Your use of the Charging Stations and
and agree that the Data may be used by any of the above-described persons for
use of Your Charging Stations, the effectiveness of infrastructure put in place to
meet the needs of drivers of electric vehicles, and the efficacy of the Program.
Your performance of this Agreement and willingness to supply and release Data
to the persons described in the immediately preceding paragraph is a material
d provide
the Charging Stations hereunder. You understand, acknowledge and agree that
CTI will need Your reasonable cooperation and assistance, and You agree to
provide your reasonable cooperation and assistance to CTI, so that CTI can
successfully conduct its testing and collect Data from You, the Charging Stations,
and public electric vehicle infrastructure utilized by You and others. Except as
set forth in this Section 7, the use of the Charging Stations will be subject to
https://www.chargepointportal.net/index.php/general/uri/privacy.html
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 7, or in the
322
Privacy Policy, CTI reserves the right, on behalf of the DOE, to collect certain
anonymous information regarding the use and operation of the Charging
Stations.
8. Certain Rights of the United States Government. Notwithstanding the fact
that You are being awarded the Charging Stations under the Program, the United
States Government reserves the right to seize the Charging Stations under
certain, limited circumstances, including, without limitation, national emergency.
9. No Right to Remove, Move or Sell the Charging Stations. The Charging
Stations may not be removed, moved or sold from their place of installation, prior
to January 1, 2014, without the prior written consent of CTI.
10. Failure to Comply with Terms of the Program. In the event that You fail to
comply with the terms of the program, including, but not limited to (i) the use of
an CTI authorized installer (ii) providing documentation of the installation costs
(iii) allowing public access to the station(s), You are liable for losses and/or
damages incurred by CTI. If You fail to comply with the program or make
restitution within 30 days of receiving a demand notice from CTI, CTI reserves
the right to repossess the charging station(s) You received under the grant.
11. Additional Charging Stations. In the event that You have purchased Charging
conditions shall apply.
12. No Amendment or Modification. No modification, amendment or waiver of this
Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and either signed or electronically
accepted by the party against whom the amendment, modification or waiver is to
be asserted.
13. Waiver. e to require your performance of any obligation
under this Agreement will in no way affect the full right to require such
this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of the p
exercise any of its rights provided in this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of
such rights. No waiver will be effective unless in writing and signed by a CTI
authorized representative. Any such waiver will be effective only with respect to
the specific instance and for the specific purpose given.
14. Applicable law. This Agreement will be construed, and performance will be
determined, according to the laws of the State of California without reference to
principles of conflicts of law and the state and federal courts of
323
California shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim arising under this
Agreement.
15. Waiver of Jury Trial. You and CTI each hereby waive any right to jury trial in
connection with any action or litigation arising out of this Agreement.
16. Severability. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, if any term or
condition of this Agreement or the application thereof to either You or CTI will to
any extent be determined by any judicial, governmental or similar authority, to be
invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of
such term or provision to this Agreement, You and CTI or circumstances other
than those as to which it is determined to be invalid or unenforceable, will not be
affected thereby.
17. Assignment. You may not assign any of your rights or obligations under this
Agreement, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written
consent of CTI.
18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, taken together, shall
constitute but one and the same document.
COULOMB TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AWARDEE:
By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________
(Signature) (Signature)
Name: Name: _________________________
Title: Title: __________________________
324
APPENDIX A CHARGING STATION LOCATIONS
Station #1 City Hall Parking Lot, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
CHARGEPOINT®
MASTERSERVICESSUBSCRIPTIONAGREEMENT
IMPORTANT:PLEASEREADTHISMASTERSERVICESSUBSCRIPTIONAGREEMENT(“AGREEMENT”)
CAREFULLY.
THISAGREEMENTGOVERNSREGISTRATIONOFYOURCHARGINGSTATIONONTHECHARGEPOINT
NETWORKANDACTIVATIONOFCHARGEPOINTNETWORKSERVICES.SUBSCRIBINGFORA
CHARGEPOINTNETWORKSERVICECONSTITUTESACCEPTANCEOFALLOFTHETERMSAND
CONDITIONSOFTHISAGREEMENTANDISBINDINGONYOUANDTHEBUSINESSENTITYYOU
REPRESENT(COLLECTIVELY, “SUBSCRIBER”OR “YOU”).IFYOUAREENTERINGINTOTHISAGREEMENT
ONBEHALFOFACOMPANYOROTHERLEGALENTITY,YOUREPRESENTTHATYOUHAVEAUTHORITY
TOBINDSUCHCOMPANYOROTHERLEGALENTITYANDITSAFFILIATESTOTHESETERMSAND
CONDITIONS;IFNOT,YOUMAYNOTENTERINTOTHISAGREEMENTANDMAYNOTUSETHE
CHARGEPOINTSERVICES.
YOUMAYNOTACCESSTHECHARGEPOINTSERVICESIFYOUAREADIRECTCOMPETITOROFCTI
EXCEPTWITHCTI’SPRIORWRITTENCONSENT.INADDITION,YOUMAYNOTACCESSTHE
CHARGEPOINTSERVICESFORPURPOSESOFMONITORINGTHEIRAVAILABILITY,PERFORMANCEOR
FUNCTIONALITY,OR ANYOTHERBENCHMARKINGOR COMPETITIVEPURPOSE.
1.DEFINITIONS.Thefollowing termsshallhavethedefinitionssetforthbelow whenusedin this
Agreement:
1.1“Affiliate”meansanyentitywhichdirectlyorindirectlycontrols,iscontrolledby,oris
undercommoncontrolwiththesubjectentity.“Control”,forpurposesofthisdefinition,meansdirect
orindirectownershiporcontroloffiftypercent(50%)ormoreofthevotinginterestsofthesubject
entity.
1.2“ChargePass™RFIDCard”meansaCTIprovisionedradio-frequencyidentificationcard
issuedtoaChargePassAccountHolderwhichpermitsaUserofsuchcardaccesstotheChargePoint
NetworkforthedeliveryofSubscriber-providedservicesandtheChargePassAccountHoldertousethe
ChargePointNetworktomanage theirChargePassAccount.
1.3“ChargePassAccount”meansanaccountregisteredwithCTIthatpermitsaUserto
prepayforaccesstoNetworkedChargingStationsutilizingaChargePassRFIDCard.
1.4“ChargePassAccountHolder”meansaUserwhohasregisteredwiththeNetwork
OperatorandcreatedaChargePassAccount.
1.5“ChargePointNetwork”meanstheNetworkOperatorprovisionedsoftware,firmware,
hardware(excludingChargingStationsownedandregisteredbySubscribers)andservicesfor
SubscribersandUsersthat,amongotherthings,provision,manage,andallowaccesstoNetworked
ChargingStationsbyChargePassAccountHoldersviatheRFIDCardandbyotherUsersviathe
utilizationofcontactlessRFIDembeddedcreditcards,orauthorizedcreditorelectronicdebitcard
transactionsandpermitSubscriberstoregister,activate,monitorandoperateChargingStations.
1.6“ChargePointNetworkStandardService”meansthebundledgroupofChargePoint
ServicesthatassistinthebasicoperationoftheNetworkedChargingStations.TheChargePoint
NetworkStandardServiceisrequiredtobesubscribedtobySubscriberinordertoregisterandactivate
aChargingStationontheChargePointNetwork.
1.7“ChargePointServices”meanstheChargePointNetworksupportservicesand
ChargePointsoftwareapplications,assuchmaybeintroducedandmadeavailabletoSubscribersbythe
336
NetworkOperatorfromtimetotime,whichprovidenetworksupportandfunctionalitiesforUsersand
SubscribersandallowSubscribers,amongotherthings,tomonitorandcontrolNetworkedCharging
Stations.ChargePointServices,including,butnotlimitedto,theChargePointNetworkStandardService,
aremadeavailableforsubscriptionbySubscriberspursuanttoPurchaseOrdersenteredintobetween
SubscriberandCTI.
1.8“ChargingSession”has thesamedefinitionas“Session”setforthbelow.
1.9“ChargingStation”meanstheelectricvehiclechargingstation(s)installedbySubscriber
attheSubscriberLocation(s),eithermanufacturedbyCTIorbyanotherentity,whichhaveembedded
withinthemCTIproprietaryhardwareandfirmware,enablingSubscribertoregisterandactivatesuch
chargingstationsontheChargePointNetwork.AchargingstationmaybedesignatedbyaSubscriberas
aCommercialChargingStationoraFreeChargingStation,aPublicChargingStationoraPrivateCharging
StationandsuchdesignationsmaybechangedatanytimewithrespecttoanyNetworkedCharging
Station(s)utilizing theChargePointNetworkStandardService.
1.10“CommercialChargingStation”meansaChargingStationthatisdesignatedbythe
SubscriberasonewhereUsersmustpayaSessionFeeforaccesstotheChargingStation.
1.11“CTI”meansCoulombTechnologies,Inc.,aDelawarecorporation.
1.12 “CTIMarks”meansthevarioustrademarks,servicemarks,namesanddesignations
usedinconnectionwiththeCTImanufacturedChargingStationsand/ortheChargePointNetwork,
including, withoutlimitation,ChargePointandChargePass.
1.13“CTIIntellectualProperty”meansallintellectualpropertyofCTIrelatingtotheCTI
Marks,theChargePointNetwork,theChargePointServices,ChargePass,ChargePassRFIDCards,
ChargePassAccountsandallotherIntellectualPropertyRightsofCTI.
1.14 “Documentation”meanswritteninformation(whethercontainedinuserortechnical
manuals,productmaterials,specificationsorotherwise)pertainingtoChargePointServicesand/orthe
ChargePointNetworkandmadeavailablebytheNetworkOperatortoSubscribersand/orUsersinany
manner(includingon-line).
1.15 “FreeChargingStation”meansaChargingStationthatisdesignatedbytheSubscriber
asone whereUsersdonotpayaSessionFeeforaccess to theChargingStation.
1.16 “IntellectualPropertyRights”meansallintellectualpropertyrights,including,without
limitation,patents,patentapplications,patentrights,trademarks,trademarkapplications,tradenames,
servicemarks,servicemarkapplications,copyrights,copyrightapplications,franchises,licenses,
inventories,know-how,tradesecrets,Subscriberlists,proprietaryprocessesandformulae,allsource
andobjectcode,algorithms,architecture,structure,displayscreens,layouts,inventions,development
toolsandalldocumentationandmediaconstituting,describingorrelatingtotheabove,including,
withoutlimitation,manuals,memorandaandrecords.
1.17“MaliciousCode”meansviruses,worms,timebombs, Trojanhorsesandothermalicious
code,malware,spyware,files,scripts,agentsorprograms.
1.18“NetSessionFees”meansallSessionFeesactuallycollectedonbehalfoftheSubscriber
fromUsersbyNetworkOperatorforuseofNetworkedChargingStationslessSessionAuthorizationFees
andSessionProcessingFees,aswellasanyTaxesandRegulatoryCharges,ifany,requiredbylawtobe
collectedbyCTIfromUsersinconnectionwiththeuseofNetworkedChargingStations.Exceptas
requiredbylaw,SubscribershallberesponsibleforthepaymentofallTaxesandRegulatoryCharges
incurredinconnection with theNetworkedChargingStations.
Page2of17
337
1.19“NetworkedChargingStation”meansaChargingStationforwhichaSubscriberhas
subscribedfortheChargePointNetworkStandardServiceandregisteredandactivatedsuchCharging
Stationon theChargePointNetwork.
1.20“NetworkOperator”meanstheentityresponsibleforprovisioning,managingand
maintainingtheChargePointNetworkandofferingChargePointServices.CTIistheNetworkOperatorin
NorthAmericabutispermittedatanytimetoassignitsrightsandobligationsasNetworkOperator
under thisAgreementtoanotherentity.
1.21 “NetworkWebPortal”meansanyofthesecureInternetwebportalsestablishedand
maintainedbytheNetworkOperatorwhichwillallow(i)SubscriberthroughitsSubscriberAccountsto
accessChargePointServicesforthemanagementandcontrolofSubscriber’sNetworkedCharging
Stationsand(ii)ChargePassAccountHoldersthroughtheirrespectiveChargePassAccounts to track their
useofNetworkedChargingStations,replenishChargePassRFIDCardsandotherwisemanagetheir
ChargePassAccount.
1.22“Party”means theNetworkOperatorandSubscriber.
1.23“PrivateChargingStation”meansaChargingStationforwhichaccessbythegeneral
publicisrestricted (e.g.,aChargingStationlocatedinaprivateparkingfacilityorrestrictedcorporate
campus).
1.24“PublicChargingStation”meansaChargingStationthatisaccessiblebyanyUser
subjectonlytostatedhoursofoperation.
1.25“PurchaseOrder”meansthepurchaseorder(s)orotherdocumentationenteredinto
betweenSubscriberandtheNetworkOperator,itsdistributorsorotherauthorizedrepresentativesfor
thesubscriptionofChargePointServices thetermsofwhichareincorporatedhereinbyreference.
1.26“PurchasedChargePointServices”meansthoseChargePointServicesmadeavailableby
theNetworkOperatorandforwhichaSubscriptionhasbeenpurchasedbySubscriberwithrespectto
anyofSubscriber’sNetworkedChargingStationsorforwhichtheSubscriptionTermhasautomatically
beenrenewedpursuant toSection 8.3(AutomaticRenewalofSubscriptions).
1.27“RegulatoryCharges”isdefinedinSection 4.6(TaxesandRegulatoryCharges).
1.28“Session”or“ChargingSession”meansacontinuousperiodoftimemeasuringnotless
thanfive(5)minutescommencingwhenaUserhasaccessedaNetworkedChargingStationandthe
deliveryofSubscriberprovidedserviceshasbeeninitiatedandterminatinguponthecessationbysuch
Userof theSubscriberprovidedservices.
1.29“SessionAuthorizationFees”meansthefeespayablebytheSubscribertotheNetwork
Operatortopre-authorizeaChargingSessionataCommercialNetworkedChargingStation.
1.30“SessionFees”meansthefeessetbytheSubscriberforaChargingSession,including
anyapplicableTaxesand/orRegulatoryCharges.
1.31“SessionProcessingFees”meansthefeeschargedbytheNetworkOperatorforthe
management,collectionandprocessingofSessionFeesonbehalfofSubscriberandtheremittanceof
NetSessionFeestoSubscribers.
1.32“SessionTransactionFees”meansthecompletesetoffees,sessionauthorizationfees
andsessionprocessingfees,chargedbytheNetworkOperatortotheSubscriberforcollectionofUser
SessionFeesonbehalfof theSubscriber,as wellasanyapplicableTaxesandRegulatoryCharges.
Page3of17
338
1.33“SoftwareApplication”meanscomputerprograms,includingfirmware,asprovidedor
otherwisemadeavailabletoSubscriberbytheNetworkOperator,oritsdistributorsorotherauthorized
representatives,asembeddedinordownloadedbySubscribertotheSubscriber’sChargingStations,
relatedproductsandanyUpgrades.
1.34“Subscriber”isanownerofoneormoreChargingStationsforwhichSubscriberhas
purchasedSubscriptionsforChargePointServicesandregisteredwithandactivatedontheChargePoint
Network.
1.35“SubscriberAccount”meansanaccount establishedbyaSubscriber.
1.36“SubscriberLocation(s)”meansthephysicallocationswhereSubscriberhasinstalled
NetworkedChargingStationsregistered with theChargePointNetwork.
1.37“Subscription”meansasubscriptionforChargePointServicespurchasedbya
Subscriber.
1.38“SubscriptionFees”meansthefeespayablebySubscribertotheNetworkOperatorfor
subscribing toanyof theChargePointServices.
1.39“SubscriptionTerm”meanstheTermforwhichSubscriberhaspurchasedaSubscription
forPurchasedChargePointServicesforaNetworkedChargingStation.
1.40“Taxes”isdefinedinSection 4.6(TaxesandRegulatoryCharges).
1.41“Upgrades”meansanyauthorizedupgrades,updates,bugfixesormodifiedversionsof
SoftwareApplicationsfurnishedby theNetworkOperator.
1.42“Users”meansanypersonusingNetworkedChargingStationsincluding,without
limitation,ChargePassAccountHolders.
1.43“You”or “Your”meansthecompanyorotherlegalentityforwhichyouareaccepting
thisAgreementand theAffiliatesof thatcompanyorentity.
2.CTI’SRESPONSIBILITIESANDAGREEMENTS.
2.1NETWORKOPERATION.TheNetworkOperatorshallbesolelyresponsiblefor:(i)
ProvisioningandOperatingtheChargePointNetwork–provisioningandoperating,maintaining,
administrationandsupportoftheChargePointNetworkinfrastructure(butexcludingSubscribers’
ChargingStationsandinfrastructurefortransmittingdatafromNetworkedChargingStationstoany
ChargePointNetworkoperationscenter);(ii)ProvisioningandOperatingNetworkWebPortals–
provisioningandoperating,maintaining,administrationandsupportoftheNetworkWebPortals;(iii)
UserAcquisition,AdministrationandSupport--acquisitionandregistrationofnewChargePassAccount
Holders,administrationandsupportofChargePassAccountsandprovisioningthesupportservicesfor
UsersembodiedintheChargePointServices,and(iv)DataProtection–usingcommerciallyreasonable
effortstocomplywithallapplicablelawsandregulationsoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaandallother
governmentalentitiesgoverning,restrictingorotherwisepertainingtotheuse,distribution,exportor
importofdata,products,servicesand/ortechnicaldatawhethersuchinformationordatarelatesto
either theSubscriberorUsersinconnectionwith theChargePointNetwork.
2.2PURCHASEDCHARGEPOINTSERVICES.TheNetworkOperatorshallmakethe
PurchasedChargePointServicesavailabletoSubscriberpursuanttothisAgreementandtheapplicable
PurchaseOrdersforeachNetworkedChargingStationduringtheSubscriptionTerm.TheNetwork
Operatorrepresentsandwarrantsthat:(i)Authority--ithasthepowerandauthoritytoenterintoand
beboundbythisAgreement,(ii)PerformanceofChargePointServices--theChargePointServicesshall
performmateriallyinaccordancewiththeDocumentation,(iii)SupportforPurchasedChargePoint
Page4of17
339
Services –itwillprovideallsupportforPurchasedChargePointServicesandtechnicalsupportand
maintenanceforallSoftwareApplicationsassetforthintheDocumentation,including,without
limitation,Upgrades,(iv)ContinuityofPurchasedChargePointServices–Itwillusecommercially
reasonableeffortstomakethePurchasedChargePointServicesavailable24hoursaday,7daysaweek,
365daysperyear,exceptforplanneddowntime(ofwhichSubscribershallbegivennotlessthaneight
(8)hourspriornoticeviaelectronicmessagingtotheemailaddressfornoticesspecifiedineach
SubscriberAccount),(v)NoDecreaseinFunctionalityofChargePointServices--subjecttoSection
2.3(vi),thefunctionalityoftheChargePointServicesshallnotmateriallydecreaseduringthe
SubscriptionTerm,and(vi)MaliciousCode –it willusecommerciallyreasonable effortstoensure thatit
doesnottransmittoSubscriberanyMaliciousCode(exceptingMaliciousCodetransmittedtoCTIorthe
NetworkOperatorbySubscriberoritsAffiliates).Subscriber’sexclusiveremedyforabreachofanyof
theforegoingshallbeasprovidedinSection8.4(Termination)andSection8.5(RefundorPayment
Upon Termination)assetforthbelow.
2.3LIMITATIONSONRESPONSIBLITY.NeitherCTI,itsdistributorsnoritsotherauthorized
representativesnortheNetworkOperatorshallberesponsiblefor,ormakesanyrepresentationor
warrantytoSubscriberwithrespecttothefollowing:(i)CompetingSubscriberLocations--specific
location(s)ornumberofNetworkedChargingStationsnow,orinthefuture,owned,operatedand/or
installedbySubscribersotherthanSubscriber,orthetotalnumberofNetworkedChargingStationsthat
comprisetheChargePointNetwork;(ii)ElectricalServiceInterruptions–continuousavailabilityof
electricalservicetoanyNetworkedChargingStations;(iii)CellularandInternetServiceInterruptions–
continuousavailabilityofanywirelessorcellularcommunicationsnetworkorInternetserviceprovider
networknotoperatedbyCTIortheNetworkOperator;(iv)NetworkIntrusions –availabilityofor
interruptionoftheChargePointNetworkattributabletounauthorizedintrusions;(v)Unregistered
ChargingStations--ChargingStationsthatarenotregisteredandactivatedwiththeChargePoint
Network,and(vi)Google™Services–thecontinuedavailabilityofanyGoogleservicesincorporatedfor
usewiththeChargePointServices;providedthat,ifGoogleceasestomaketheGoogleApplication
ProgrammingInterface(“API”)oranysimilarprogramavailableonreasonable termsfor theChargePoint
Services,theNetworkOperatorshallmakecommerciallyreasonable effortstoreplacetheGoogleAPIor
suchsimilarprogramwithproductsprovidingsimilarfunctionalitiesifsuchproductsareavailableupon
termswhichtheNetworkOperator,initsreasonablediscretion,believesarecommerciallyreasonable;
andprovidedfurtherthat,ifGoogleceasestomaketheGoogleAPIorsimilarprogramavailable,or
availableonreasonabletermsfortheChargePointServices,theNetworkOperatormayceaseproviding
suchfeatures withoutentitlingSubscriber toanyrefund,creditorothercompensation.
2.4DISCLAIMEROFWARRANTY.EXCEPTASOTHERWISEEXPRESSLYSETFORTHINTHIS
SECTION2,NEITHERCTI,THENETWORKOPERATORNORANYOFTHEIRRESPECTIVEDISTRIBUTORSOR
OTHERAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVESASAPPLICABLE,MAKESANYWARRANTIESOFANYKIND,
WHETHEREXPRESSORIMPLIED,STATUTORYOROTHERWISE,ANDHEREBYEXPRESSLYDISCLAIMSALL
IMPLIEDWARRANTIES,INCLUDINGANYWARRANTIESOFMERCHANTABILITYFORFITNESSFORA
PARTICULARPURPOSE, TOTHE MAXIMUMEXTENTPERMITTEDBYAPPLICABLELAW.
3.SUBSCRIBERRESPONSIBILITIESANDAGREEMENTS
3.1GENERAL.Subscribershallbesolelyresponsiblefor:(i)InstallationofCharging
Stationsand/orRelatedElectricalVehicleChargingProducts–thepurchaseandinstallationof
Subscriber’sChargingStationsandother electricalvehiclechargingproductsshallbeatSubscriber’ssole
costand expense;(ii)Registrationand ActivationofCharging Stationswiththe ChargePointNetwork–
registrationwithandactivationofSubscriber’sChargingStationsontheChargePointNetworkthrougha
NetworkWebPortal,including,withoutlimitation,keepingcurrentSubscriber’scontactinformation,
emailaddressforthereceiptofnoticeshereunder,billingaddressforinvoicesandpaymentof
Page5of17
340
Subscriber’sNetSessionFeesdueunderthisAgreement;(iii)PricingandAccess--settingthepricing
(includingallapplicableTaxesandRegulatoryCharges)foranySubscriberprovidedservicesaccessedby
UsersthroughNetworkedChargingStationsthataredesignatedCommercialChargingStationsandany
conditionslimitingaccessthereof,(iv)UpdateofRegistrationofChargingStations--ifaNetworked
ChargingStationismovedfromitsregisteredlocationSubscribershallupdatetheregistrationlocation
oftheNetworkedChargingStationontheappropriateNetworkWebPortalwithinfive(5)businessdays
ofmakinganychangeintheSubscriberLocation(s);(v)IdentificationofChargingStationsand
SubscriberLocations–provisioningandinstallationofappropriatesignagethatclearlyandprominently
identifiesand,whereappropriate,providesdirectionstotheSubscriberLocationssothattheymaybe
easilylocatedbyUsers;(vi)PublicAccessLevel –designationofeachNetworkedChargingStationas
eitheraPublicChargingStationoraPrivateChargingStation;(vii)Commercialization–designationof
eachNetworkedChargingStationaseitheraCommercialChargingStationoraFreeChargingStation;
(viii)AppearanceandCleanliness--keepingNetworkedChargingStationsandSubscriberLocations(s)
cleanandfreeofgraffiti,unauthorizedadvertising,debrisandothermaterialsthatwouldobscure,block
accessorotherwisedetractfromorcastanegativelightonthereputationoftheChargePointNetwork;
(ix)Maintenance,ServiceandRepairofNetworkedChargingStations–exceptasrequiredbyany
applicablewarranty,themaintenance,service,repairand/orreplacementofSubscriber’sNetworked
ChargingStationsasneeded,includingdeactivationofNetworkedChargingStationsthatarenon-
operationalandnotintendedtobereplacedorrepairedbySubscriberwithinten(10)businessdays
fromtheChargePointNetwork;(x)LocationofChargingStations--assuringtheaccessibility,lighting
andotherfactorspertainingtothesafetyofUserswhileutilizingtheChargingStationsnotdirectly
relatedtothedesignormanufactureoftheChargingStationsthemselves;and(xi)Compliancewith
Laws–operatingandmaintainingtheSubscriber’sNetworkedChargingStationsinamannerthat
complieswithallapplicablelaws.
3.2REPRESENTATIONSANDWARRANTIESOFSUBSCRIBER.Subscriberrepresentsand
warrantstoCTI,theNetworkOperator,theirrespectiveitsdistributorsandotherauthorized
representativesthat:(i)Authority--Subscriberhasthepowerandauthoritytoenterintoandbe
boundbythisAgreementandtoinstalltheChargingStationsandanyotherelectricalvehiclecharging
productstoberegisteredandactivatedontheChargePointNetworkattheSubscriberLocation(s);(ii)
NoViolationWithSubscriber’sElectricalSupplyorOtherAgreements--Subscriberassumesall
responsibilitythattheelectricalusageconsumedbyanyofSubscriber’sNetworkedChargingStation
doesnotviolateorotherwiseconflictwiththetermsandconditionsofanyapplicableelectrical
purchaseorotheragreementincluding,withoutlimitation,anylease,towhichSubscriberisaparty;(iii)
InstallationofChargingStationsWillNotViolateAnyOtherAgreementsorLaws--Subscriberwillnot
installorattachChargingStationsonortoinfrastructurenotownedbySubscriberwithoutproper
authority,orinamannerthatwillblockanyeasementorrightofway.Subscriberwillobservealllegal
requirementswithrespecttovehicleclearancesfromintersections,pointsofingressoregressand
publicinfrastructuresuchasfirehydrants,lampposts,parkingmeters,andwillotherwiseobserveall
applicablegovernmentalrestrictionsorrestrictionsapplicabletotheSubscriberLocationsunderany
otheragreementstowhichSubscriberissubject;and(iv)ComplianceLaws--Subscriberwillcomply
withallapplicablelaws.
3.3FURTHERAGREEMENTSOFSUBSCRIBERMADEINCONNECTIONWITHREGISTRATION
OFCHARGINGSTATIONSONTHECHARGEPOINTNETWORKANDUSEOFCHARGEPOINTSERVICES.
SubscriberfurtheracknowledgesandagreeswiththeNetworkOperator,CTI,andtheirrespective
distributorsandauthorizedrepresentatives,asapplicable,asfollows:(i)DisplayofCTIMarks--
Subscriberwillnotremove,concealorcovertheCTIMarksoranyothermarkings,labels,legends,
trademarks,ortradenamesinstalledorplacedontheNetworkedChargingStationsoranyperipheral
equipmentforuseinconnectionwiththeNetworkedChargingStationsforsolongassuchCharging
Page6of17
341
StationsareNetworkedChargingStations;(ii)UseofNetworkWebPortals--Subscribershallcomply
with,andshallhaveresponsibilityforandcauseallotherpersonsaccessingorusingNetworkWeb
Portalstocomplywith,alloftherules,regulationsandpoliciesoftheNetworkOperator,aswellas
othernetworksandcomputersystemsusedtoaccessNetworkWebPortals,whetheroperatedby
Subscriber,itssuppliersorothersandSubscriberagreestoindemnifyandholdtheNetworkOperator,
CTI,andtheirrespectivedistributorsandauthorizedrepresentatives,directors,shareholders,officers,
agents,employees,permittedsuccessorsandassignsharmlessfromanythirdpartynotices,allegations,
claims,suitsorproceedings(each,a“Claim”)resultingfromSubscriber’suseofNetworkWebPortals
andtheChargePointServicesinviolationofthetermsofthisSection3.3(ii)orofSection3.3(iii);(iii)Use
oftheChargePointNetworkandChargePointServices–Subscribershallberesponsibleforuseofthe
ChargePointServicesincompliancewiththisAgreement,andinparticular,shall:(A)useits
commerciallyreasonableeffortstopreventunauthorizedaccesstoPurchasedChargePointServices,(B)
usethePurchasedChargePointServicesonlyinaccordancewiththeDocumentationandapplicablelaws
andgovernmentregulation,(C)shallnotsell,resell,rentorleasethePurchasedChargePointServices,
(D)shallnotinterfere withordisrupttheintegrityoftheChargePointNetwork,theChargePointServices
oranythirdpartydatacontainedtherein,and(E)shallnotattempttogainunauthorizedaccesstothe
ChargePointNetworkortheChargePointServicesortheirrelatedsystemsornetworks;(iv)Future
ChargePointServices – PurchaseOrdersarenotcontingenton thedeliveryofanyfuturefunctionalityor
features,nordependentonanyoralorwrittencommentsanticipatingfuturefunctionalityorfeatures;
(iv)OwnershipofData--Alldatacollectedby theNetworkOperatorinconnection with theoperationof
theChargePointNetworkshallbeownedbyCTIandtheNetworkOperatorandSubscriber
acknowledgesandagreesthatSubscribershallhavenorightofaccessortheuseofsuchdataforany
purposeotherthanthemanagementofSubscriber’sNetworkedChargingStationswhileregisteredwith
theChargePointNetwork.
4.FEES ANDPAYMENTFORPURCHASEDCHARGEPOINTSERVICES.
4.1SUBSCRIPTIONFEES.SubscribershallpaytheSubscriptionFeessetforthonany
PurchaseOrderforPurchasedChargePointServices.Exceptasotherwisespecifiedhereinorinany
PurchaseOrder,(i)SubscriptionFeesarequotedinandpayableinU.S.Dollars,(ii)SubscriptionFeesare
basedonChargePointServicespurchasedandnotonactualusage,(iii)paymentobligationsarenon-
cancelableandarenon-refundable,and(iv)Subscriptionsarenon-transferable(provided,thatany
SubscriptionmaybetransferredtoaChargingStationthatispurchasedbySubscribertoreplacea
previouslyNetworkedChargingStation).SubscriptionFeesarebasedonannualperiodsthatbeginon
thedateof theSubscriptionstartdateandend eachannualanniversary thereafter.
4.2INVOICINGANDPAYMENT.SubscribershallprovidetheNetworkOperatorwithvalid
anduptodatecreditcardinformationifSubscriberissubscribingforChargePointServicesonline
throughtheapplicableNetworkWebPortal.Inallothercases,paymentofSubscriptionFeesshallbe
madeunderthetermsofanyacceptedPurchaseOrderpursuanttoamethodofpaymentreasonably
acceptableto theNetworkOperator.WhereSubscriberprovidescreditcardinformationto theNetwork
OperatorthroughsuchNetworkWebPortalforthepaymentofSubscriptionFees,Subscriberhereby
authorizestheNetworkOperatortochargesuchcreditcardforallPurchasedChargePointServicesfor
theinitialSubscriptionTermandtheautomaticrenewalofSubscriptionTerm(s)assetforthinSection
8.3(AutomaticRenewalofSubscriptions).Allcreditcardchargesshallbemadeinadvance,either
annuallyorinaccordancewiththetermsoftheacceptedPurchaseOrder.IfthePurchaseOrder
specifiesthatpaymentshallbemadebyamethodotherthancreditcard,theNetworkOperator,its
distributorsorauthorizedrepresentatives,asapplicable,shallinvoiceSubscriberinadvancein
accordancewiththeacceptedPurchaseOrder(includingtheautomaticrenewalofSubscriptionTerm(s))
andinvoicedchargesshallbedue within thirty(30)daysof theinvoicedate.
Page7of17
342
4.3OVERDUESUBSCRIPTIONFEES.IfanyinvoicedSubscriptionFeesarenotreceivedby
theNetworkOperatorbytheduedate, thensuchcharges:(i)mayaccruelateinterestat therateofone
andone-halfpercent(1.5%)oftheoutstandingbalancepermonth,orthemaximumratepermittedby
law,whicheverislower,fromthedatesuchpaymentwasdueuntilpaid,and(ii)theNetworkOperator
mayconditionfutureSubscriptionrenewalsandacceptanceofPurchaseOrdersonpayment termsother
than thosesetforthherein.
4.4ACCELERATIONANDSUSPENSIONOFCHARGEPOINTSERVICES.Ifanyamountowing
bySubscriberunderthisAgreementforSubscriptionFeesforPurchasedChargePointServicesorunder
anyotheragreementbetweentheNetworkOperatorandSubscriberismorethanthirty(30)days
overdue(or,intheeventthatSubscriberhasauthorizedtheNetworkOperatortochargetheamount
owingtoSubscriber’screditcardandpaymentundersuchcreditcardhasbeendeclined,morethan5
dayshaspassedsinceSubscriberhasreceivednoticefromtheNetworkOperatorofsuchevent),the
NetworkOperatormay,withoutotherwiselimitingtheNetworkOperator’srightsorremedies,
accelerateSubscriber’sunpaidfeeobligationsundersuchagreementssothatallsuchobligations
becomeimmediatelydueandpayable,andsuspendtheusebySubscriberof thePurchasedChargePoint
Servicesuntilsuchamountsarepaidinfull.
4.5PAYMENTDISPUTES.TheNetworkOperatorshallnotexerciseitsrightsunderSection
4.3(OverdueSubscriptionFees)orSection4.4(AccelerationandSuspensionofChargePointServices)if
theapplicablechargesareunderreasonableandgoodfaithdisputeandSubscriberiscooperating
diligentlytoresolvethedispute.
4.6TAXESANDREGULATORYCHARGES.Unlessrequiredbylaworotherwisestatedherein,
SessionAuthorizationFeesandSessionProcessingFeesdonotincludeanytaxes,levies,dutiesorsimilar
governmentalassessmentsofanynature,including,butnotlimitedto,valueadded,sales,local,city,
stateorfederal taxes(“Taxes”)oranyfeesorotherassessmentsleviedorimposedbyanygovernmental
regulatoryagency(“RegulatoryCharges”).SubscriberisresponsibleforthepaymentofallTaxesand
RegulatoryChargeshereunderinconnection withPurchasedChargePointServices,SessionFees,Session
AuthorizationFeesandSessionProcessingFees;provided,thattheNetworkOperatorissolely
responsibleforallTaxesandRegulatoryChargesassessablebasedontheNetworkOperator’sincome,
propertyandemployees.WheretheNetworkOperatorisrequiredbylawtocollectand/orremitthe
TaxesorRegulatoryChargesforwhichSubscriberisresponsible,theappropriateamountshallbe
invoicedtoSubscriberinaccordancewiththisSection4anddeductedbytheNetworkOperatorfrom
SessionFees,unlessSubscriberhasotherwiseprovidedtheNetworkOperatorwithavalidtaxor
regulatoryexemptioncertificateorauthorizationfrom theappropriatetaxingorregulatoryauthority.
5.FLEX-BILLINGSERVICEFOR NETWORKED CHARGINGSTATIONS.
5.1.SESSIONFEES.Subscribershallhavesoleauthoritytodetermineandsetinreal-timea
User’sSessionFees(whichshallincludeallapplicableTaxesandRegulatoryCharges)applicableto
Subscriber’sNetworkedChargingStationsthataredesignatedasCommercialChargingStations.
5.2SESSIONTRANSACTIONFEES.InexchangefortheNetworkOperatorcollectingSession
FeesonbehalfoftheSubscriber,theSubscriberherebyauthorizestheNetworkOperatortodeduct
fromallSessionFeescollected:(i)aSessionAuthorizationFee,and(ii)aSessionProcessingFee,eachin
theamountandsubjecttothe termsandconditionsassetforthinSchedule 1.
5.3PAYMENTTOSUBSCRIBEROFNETSESSIONFEES.TheNetworkOperatorshallremitto
Subscribernotmorethanthirty(30)daysaftertheendofeachcalendarmonthtotheaddresssetforth
inSubscriber’sAccountinformationregisteredontheapplicableNetworkWebPortalallNetSession
Fees.
Page8of17
343
5.5NO COMMERCIALIZATIONOF CHARGINGSTATIONSPRIORTOJULY1, 2010.Subscriber
acknowledgesandagreesthatpriortoJuly1,2010,NetworkedChargingStationsshallnotbe
commercialized,i.e.,noSessionAuthorizationFeewillbepaidbySubscribersandnoSessionFees willbe
collectedfromUsers.
6.PROPRIETARYRIGHTS
.
6.1RESERVATIONOFRIGHTS.Subjecttothelimitedrightsgrantedexpresslyhereunder,
CTIreservesallright,titleandinterestinandtotheChargePointServices,includingallrelated
IntellectualPropertyRights.NorightsaregrantedtoSubscriberhereunderexceptasexpresslysetforth
herein.CTIshallhavearoyalty-free,worldwide,transferable,sublicensable,irrevocableperpetual
licensetouseorincorporateintheChargePointServicesanysuggestions,enhancementrequests,
recommendationsorotherfeedbackprovidedbySubscribersorUsersrelatingtotheChargePoint
Services.
6.2RESTRICTIONSONUSE.NeitherSubscribernoranyofitsAffiliatesshall:(i)permitany
thirdpartytoaccesstheChargePointServicesexceptasotherwiseexpresslyprovidedhereinorinany
PurchaseOrder,(ii)createderivativeworksbasedontheChargePointServices,(iii)copy,frameor
mirroranypartorcontentoftheChargePointServices,otherthancopyingorframingonSubscribers
ownintranetsorotherwiseforSubscriber’sowninternalbusinesspurposes,(iv)reverseengineerany
ChargingStationorSoftwareApplication,or(v)accesstheChargePointNetwork,anyNetworkWeb
PortalortheChargePointServicesinorderto(A)buildacompetitiveproductorservice,or(B)copyany
features,functions,interface,graphicsor“lookandfeel”ofanyNetworkWebPortalortheChargePoint
Services.
6.3GRANTOFLIMITEDLICENSEFORCTIMARKS.
(a)LICENSEGRANT.SubscriberisgrantedunderthisAgreementthenonexclusive
privilegeofdisplayingtheCTIMarksduringtheTermofthisAgreementinconnectionwiththe
NetworkedChargingStationsinstalledbySubscriber.Subscriber warrants thatitshallnotuseanyof the
CTIMarksforanyproductsotherthantheNetworkedChargingStationsattheSubscriberLocations(s).
CTImayprovidetrademarkusageguidelineswithrespecttoSubscriber’suseoftheCTIMarkswhichwill
bemadeavailableonaNetworkWebPortal,inwhichcaseSubscriberthereaftermustcomplywithsuch
guidelines.Ifnosuchguidelinesareprovided,thenforeachinitialuseoftheCTIMark,Subscribermust
obtainCTI’spriorwrittenconsent,whichshallnotbeunreasonablywithheldordelayed,andaftersuch
consentisobtained,SubscribermayusetheCTIMarkintheapprovedmanner.TheCTIMarksmaynot
beusedunderthisAgreementasapartofthenameunderwhichSubscriber’sbusinessisconductedor
inconnectionwith thenameofabusinessofSubscriberoritsAffiliates.
(b)NOREGISTRATIONOFCTIMARKSBYSUBSCRIBER.NeitherSubscribernorany
ofitsAffiliates willtakeanyaction,directlyorindirectly,toregisterorapplyfororcausetoberegistered
orappliedinSubscriber’sfavororinthefavorofanythirdpartyanyCTI Marksoranypatent, trademark,
servicemark,copyright,tradename,domainnameorregistereddesignthatissubstantiallysimilartoa
patent,trademark,servicemark,copyright,tradenameorregistereddesignofCTIortheNetwork
Operator,orthatislicensedto,connectedwithorderivedfromconfidential,materialorproprietary
informationimpartedtoorlicensedtoSubscriberbyCTIortheNetworkOperator.
(c)USEOFCTIMARKSBYSUBSCRIBERONINTERNET.Subscribershallbeentitled
tousetheCTIMarkstopromotetheChargePointNetworkonSubscriber-ownedwebsitesandthrough
,thatSubscriberislimitedtousingthe
theInternetadvertisingofSubscriberanditsAffiliates,provided
CTIMarksinconnectionwiththeInternetasfollows:(i)CompliancewithLaw--theusemustbein
compliancewithlocalrulesregardingadvertisingoftheNetworkedChargingStationsandthe
Page9of17
344
ChargePointNetworkontheInternet;(ii)NoDomainName--nolicenseisgrantedtouseorregister
anydomainnamecontaining“CTI”,thenameoftheNetworkOoperatorortheCTIMarks;and(iii)
NoticeofLicense –SubscriberanditsAffiliates,asapplicable,willatalltimesindicatethateachofthe
CTI MarksisamarkofCTIandusedunderlicense,asappropriate.
(d)TERMINATIONANDCESSATIONOFUSEOFCTIMARKS.Uponterminationof
thisAgreementSubscriberanditsAffiliateswillimmediatelydiscontinuealluseanddisplayofthename
“CTI”, thenameof theNetworkOperatorand theCTI Marks.
6.4FEDERALGOVERNMENTENDUSERPROVISIONS.CTIprovidestheChargePoint
Services,includingSoftwareApplicationsandtechnology,forultimatefederalgovernmentenduse
solelyinaccordancewiththefollowing:Governmenttechnicaldataandsoftwarerightsrelatedtothe
ChargePointServicesincludeonlythoserightscustomarilyprovidedtothepublicasdefinedinthis
Agreement.ThiscustomarycommerciallicenseisprovidedinaccordancewithFAR11.211(Technical
Data)andFAR11.212(Software)and,forDepartmentofDefensetransactions,DFAR252.227-7015
(TechnicalData–Commercialitems)andDFAR226.7202-3(RightsinCommercialComputerSoftwareor
ComputerSoftwareDocumentation).Ifagovernmentagencyhasaneedforrightsnotconveyedunder
theseterms,itmustnegotiatewithCTItodetermineifthereareacceptabletermsfortransferringsuch
rights,andamutuallyacceptablewrittenaddendumspecificallyconveyingsuchrightsmustbeincluded
inanyapplicablePurchaseorder,contractorotheragreement.
7.INDEMNIFICATION
7.1INDEMNIFICATIONOFSUBSCRIBERBYCTI.ProvidedthatCTIhassolecontrolofsuch
defenseand/orsettlementandSubscriberdoesnottakeapositionadversetoCTI,tothefullestextent
permittedbylaw,CTIshalldefend,indemnifyandholdharmlessSubscriber,itsofficers,employeesand
agentsagainstanynotices,claims,losses,suits,proceedingsorliability(“Claim”)broughtbya thirdparty
arisingorrelatingtothewillfulornegligentacts(activeorpassive)oromissionsofCTI,itsofficers,
employeesoragents. ThisindemnityprovisionshallincludeanyClaimfromandagainstanyandall third
partyagainstSubscriber,itsofficers,employees,andagentsfor(i)theinfringementofanypatent,
copyright,trademark,servicemark,tradename,tradesecretorsimilarproprietaryrightsregarding
IntellectualPropertyRights(orlicense,access,oruserightstherein)providedbyCTItoSubscriberunder
thisAgreement. TheacceptanceofsaidservicesbySubscribershallnotoperateasa waiverofsuchright
ofindemnification.CTIagreesthatitshallnotsettleanyClaimunlessSubscriberanditsAffiliates,as
applicable,areunconditionallyreleasedfromanyliabilityaspartofanysettlement.Thisindemnitydoes
notextendtoanysuitbaseduponanyinfringementorallegedinfringementofanyIntellectualProperty
Rightsbythecombinationofaproduct(includingtheChargePoint™Services)furnishedbyCTIwith
otherelementsnotfurnishedbyCTIifsuchinfringementwouldhavebeenavoidedbytheuseoftheCTI
product(includinginconjunctionwith theCTIfurnishedChargePoint™Services)alone.
7.2INDEMNIFCATIONOFCTIANDTHENETWORKOPERATORBYSUBSCRIBER.Subscriber
shalldefendCTI,theNetworkOperator,andtheirrespectivedistributors,authorizedagents,directors,
shareholders,officers,agents,employees,permittedsuccessorsandassignsagainstanyClaimbrought
byathirdparty(i)asaresultofSubscriber’snegligenceorwillfulmisconductor(ii)allegingthat
Subscriber’soranyofitsAffiliates’useoftheChargePointNetworkorChargePointServicesinviolation
ofthisAgreementinfringesormisappropriatestheIntellectualPropertyRightsofanythirdpartyor
violatesapplicablelaw,andtopaycostsanddamagesfinallyawardedinanysuchsuitoragreedtoby
Subscriberinsettlementwithsuchthirdparty(includingreasonableattorney’sfeesandexpenses),
providedthatSubscriberisnotifiedpromptlyinwritingofthesuitandatSubscriber’srequestandatits
expenseisgivencontrolofsaidsuitandallrequestedreasonableassistancefordefenseofsame.
SubscriberagreesthatitshallnotsettleanyClaimunlessCTI,theNetworkOperator,andtheir
Page10of17
345
respectivedistributorsand/orotherauthorizedrepresentatives,asapplicable,areunconditionally
releasedfromanyliabilityaspartofanysettlement.
7.3LIMITATIONOFLIABILITY.ExceptassetforthinSection7.1,theNetworkOperatorand
CTI’saggregateliabilityunderthisAgreementshallnotexceedtheaggregateSubscriptionFeespaidby
SubscribertotheNetworkOperatorinthecalendaryearpriortotheeventgivingrisetotheClaim.THE
FOREGOINGDOESNOTLIMITSUBSCRIBER’SPAYMENTOBLIGATIONSFORTHEPURCHASED
CHARGEPOINTSERVICES.
7.4EXCLUSIONOFCONSEQUENTIALANDRELATEDDAMAGES.REGARDLESSOFWHETHER
ANYREMEDYSETFORTHHEREINFAILSOFITSESSENTAILPURPORSEOROTHERWISE,INNOEVENTWILL
CTI,THENETWORKOPERATORORTHEIRRESPECTIVEDISTRIBUTORSOROTHERAUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVESBELIABLEFORANYLOSTREVENUEORPROFIT,LOSTORDAMAGEDDATA,BUSINESS
INTERRUPTION,LOSSOFCAPITAL,ORFORSPECIAL,INDIRECT,CONSEQUENTIAL,INCIDENTALOR
PUNITIVEDAMAGES,HOWEVERCAUSEDANDREGARDLESSOFTHETHEORYOFLIABILITYORWHETHER
ARISINGOUTOFTHEUSEOFORINABILITYTOUSETHECHARGEPOINTNETWORK,ANYCHARGEPOINT
SERVICES,THISAGREEMENTOROTHERWISEORBASEDONANYEXPRESSED,IMPLIEDORCLAIMED
WARRANTIESBYSUBSCRIBERNOTSPECIFICALLYSETFORTHINTHISAGREEMENTANDEVENIFCTI,THE
NETWORKOPERATORORTHEIRRESPECTIVEDISTRIBUTORS,OTHERAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVES,
SUPPLIERSORLICENSORSHAVEBEENADVISEDOFTHEPOSSIBLITYOFSUCHDAMAGES.BECAUSESOME
STATESORJURISDICITONDONOTALLOWLIMITATIONOREXCLUSIONOFCONSEQUENTIALOR
INCIDENTALDAMAGES,THEABOVELIMITATIONMAYNOTAPPLYTOYOU.
7.5EXCLUSIVEREMEDY.Theforegoingstatestheindemnifyingparty’ssoleliabilityto,and
theindemnifiedparty’sexclusiveremedyagainst,theotherpartywithrespecttoanyClaimdescribedin
thisSection7.
7.6ELECTRICAL,CELLULARANDINTERNETSERVICEINTERRUPTIONS.NoneofCTI,the
NetworkOperator,anyoftheirrespectivedistributors,otherauthorizedrepresentatives,orSubscriber
shallhaveanyliabilitywhatsoevertotheotherwithrespecttodamagescausedby:(i)electrical
outages,powersurges,brown-outs,utilityloadmanagementoranyothersimilarelectricalservice
interruptionswhateverthecause;(ii)interruptionsinwirelessorcellularservicelinkingNetworked
ChargingStationstotheChargePointNetwork;(iii)interruptionsattributabletounauthorized
ChargePointNetworkintrusions;or(iv)interruptionsinservicesprovidedbyanyInternetservice
providernotaffiliatedwithCTIortheNetworkOperator.Thisincludesthelossofdataresultingfrom
such electrical,wireless,cellularorInternetserviceinterruptions.
8.TERMANDTERMINATION.
8.1TERMOFAGREEMENT.ThisAgreementshallbecomeeffectiveonthedateof
acceptanceandcontinuesuntilallSubscriptions(includinganyautomaticrenewalsthereof)purchased
bySubscriberhavebeenterminatedorotherwisehave expired.
8.2TERMOFPURCHASEDSUBSCRIPTIONS.SubscriptionspurchasedbySubscriber
commenceonthestartdatespecifiedinthePurchaseOrderandshallcontinuefortheapplicable
SubscriptionTermspecifiedthereinforeachSubscriptionoruntilthePurchasedChargePointServices
providedpursuanttoanySubscriptionareotherwiseterminated,changedorcanceledbytheNetwork
OperatororSubscriberasallowedby thetermsandconditionssetforthherein.
8.3AUTOMATICRENEWALOFSUBSCRIPTIONS.Unlessotherwisespecifiedinthe
applicablePurchaseOrder,allpurchasedSubscriptionsshallautomaticallyberenewedforaperiod
equaltothatoftheexpiringSubscription,unlesseitherpartygivestheothernoticeofnon-renewalnot
lessthanthirty(30)dayspriortothescheduleexpirationdatefortherelevantSubscriptionTerm.The
Page11of17
346
per-unitpricingforanyrenewaltermshallbethesameasduringthepriortermunlesstheNetwork
OperatorshallhavegivenSubscribernoticetotheemailaddressfortheSubscriberAccountthat
SubscriberhasprovidedhereunderofanyincreaseinpricingforSubscriptionsnotlessthanthirty(30)
dayspriortotheendofsuchexpiringSubscription,inwhichcasethepriceincreaseshallbeeffective
uponrenewalandthereafter.Anysuchpricingincreaseshallnotexceedtenpercent(10%)overthe
pricingfortherelevantPurchasedChargePointServicesinthepriorterm,unlessthepricingforsuch
expiringSubscriptionwasdesignatedintheapplicablePurchaseOrderaspromotionaloraone-time
offer.
8.4TERMINATION.
(a)BYTHENETWORKOPERATOR.ThisAgreementandthePurchasedChargePoint
Servicesfurnishedhereundermaybeimmediatelysuspendedorterminated:(i)ifSubscriberisin
materialviolationofanyofSubscriber’sobligationsunderthisAgreement,provided,thatSubscriber
shallbegivenwrittennoticeofsuchviolationandifcuredwithinthirty(30)daysofsuchnotice,any
suspensionorterminationofPurchasedChargePointServicesshallberestoredandthisAgreementshall
continueineffect,(ii)Subscriberbecomesthesubjectofapetitioninbankruptcyoranyother
proceedingrelatedtoinsolvency,receivership,liquidationoranassignmentforthebenefitofcreditors,
(iii)uponthedeterminationbyanyregulatorybodythatthesubjectmatterofthisAgreementissubject
toanygovernmentalregulatoryauthorizationorreview,or(iv)if,pursuanttothetermsofthis
Agreement,theNetworkOperatorispermittedtherighttoterminateupontheoccurrenceofanevent
orevents.
(b)BYSUBSCRIBER.ThisAgreementmaybeterminatedbySubscriberforcause:
(i)uponthirty(30)dayswrittennoticegiventotheNetworkOperatorallegingamaterialbreachofthis
Agreementandtheallegedbreachremainsunremediedattheexpirationofsuchperiod,or(ii)the
NetworkOperatorbecomesthesubjectofapetitioninbankruptcyoranyotherproceedingrelatedto
insolvency,receivership,liquidationoranassignmentforthebenefitofcreditors.ThisAgreementmay
beterminatedbySubscriberuponthevoluntarydeactivationandremovalfromregistrationviathe
applicableNetworkWebPortalofallNetworkedChargingStationsownedbySubscriberanditsAffiliates
fromtheChargePointNetwork,atwhichtimethisAgreementshallterminateeffectiveimmediately;
provided,thatSubscribershallnotbeentitledtoanyrefundofprepaidSubscriptionFeesasaresultof
such termination.
8.5REFUNDORPAYMENTUPONTERMINATION.UponanyterminationofthisAgreement
forcausebySubscriberpursuanttoSection8.4(b)(i),or(ii)ortheelectionoftheNetworkOperatorto
terminatethisAgreementpursuanttoSection8.4(a)(iii),theNetworkOperatorshallrefundto
Subscriberthepro-rataportionofanypre-paidSubscriptionFeesfortheremainderoftheapplicable
Subscription TermforallSubscriptionsafter the effectivedateof termination.Uponany terminationfor
causebytheNetworkOperatorpursuanttoSection8.4(a)(i),(ii)or(iv)oruponthevoluntaryremoval
fromregistrationandactivationofallofSubscriber’sNetworkChargingStationsfromtheChargePoint
Network,SubscribershallpayanyunpaidSubscriptionFeescoveringtheremainderoftheSubscription
TermforanyacceptedPurchaseOrders.InnoeventshallanyterminationrelieveSubscriberofany
liabilityforthepaymentofSubscriptionFeesorSessionProcessingFeesforanyperiodpriortothe
terminationdate.Subscriber
.Nomodification,amendmentorwaiverofthisAgreement
9.AMENDMENTORMODIFICATION
shallbeeffectiveunlessinwritingandeithersignedorelectronicallyacceptedbythepartyagainst
whomtheamendment,modificationorwaiveris tobeasserted;provided,thatsubjecttoanyapplicable
PurchaseOrdertheNetworkOperatormaychangetheSessionAuthorizationFeeand/ortheSession
ProcessingFeeasprovidedinSchedule 1.
Page12of17
347
10.WAIVER
.ThefailureofeitherPartyatanytimetorequireperformancebytheotherPartyof
anyobligationhereunderwillinnowayaffectthefullrighttorequiresuchperformanceatanytime
thereafter.The waiverby eitherPartyofabreachofanyprovisionhereofwillnotconstitutea waiverof
theprovisionitself.ThefailureofeitherPartytoexerciseanyofitsrightsprovidedinthisAgreement
willnotconstituteawaiverofsuchrights.Nowaiverwillbeeffectiveunlessinwritingandsignedbyan
authorizedrepresentativeofthePartyagainstwhomsuchwaiverissoughttobeenforced.Anysuch
waiver willbe effectiveonly withrespecttothespecificinstanceandfor thespecificpurposegiven.
11.FORCEMAJEURE.Exceptwithrespecttopaymentobligations,neithertheNetworkOperator
norSubscriberwillbeliableforfailuretoperformanyofitsobligationshereunderduetocausesbeyond
suchparty’sreasonablecontrolandoccurringwithoutitsfaultornegligence(a “ForceMajeureEvent”).
AForceMajeureEventwillinclude,butnotbelimitedto,fire,flood,earthquakeorothernatural
disaster(irrespectiveofsuchparty’sconditionofanypreparednesstherefore);war,embargo;riot;
strike;laboraction;anylawfulorder,decree,orotherdirectiveofanygovernmentauthoritythat
prohibitsapartyfromperformingitsobligationsunderthisAgreement;materialshortages;shortageof
transport;andfailuresofsupplierstodelivermaterialorcomponentsinaccordancewiththetermsof
theircontracts.
.ThisAgreementwillbeconstrued,andperformancewillbedetermined,
11.APPLICABLELAW
accordingto thelawsoftheStateofCaliforniawithoutreferencetosuchstate’sprinciplesofconflictsof
law(the “ApplicableLaw”)andthestateandfederalcourtsofCaliforniashallhaveexclusivejurisdiction
overanyclaimarisingunder thisAgreement.
12.WAIVEROFJURYTRIAL.EachPartyherebywaivesanyrighttojurytrialinconnectionwithany
actionorlitigationarisingoutofthisAgreement.
13.SURVIVAL.ThoseprovisionsdealingwiththeIntellectualPropertyRightsofCTI,limitationsof
liabilityanddisclaimers,restrictionsofwarranty,ApplicableLawandthoseotherprovisionswhichby
theirnatureortermsareintendedtosurvivetheterminationofthisAgreementwillremaininfullforce
and effectasbetween thePartiesheretoascontemplatedhereby.
14.SEVERABILITY.Exceptasotherwisespecificallyprovidedherein,ifanytermorconditionofthis
AgreementortheapplicationthereoftoeitherPartywilltoanyextentbedeterminedjointlybythe
Partiesorbyanyjudicial,governmentalorsimilarauthority,tobeinvalidorunenforceable,the
remainderofthisAgreement,ortheapplicationofsuchtermorprovisiontothisAgreement,theParties
orcircumstancesotherthanthoseastowhichitisdeterminedtobeinvalidorunenforceable,willnot
beaffectedthereby.If,howeversuchinvalidityorunenforceabilitywill,inthereasonableopinionof
eitherPartycausethisAgreementtofailofitsintendedpurposeandthePartiescannotbymutual
agreementamendthisAgreementtocuresuchfailure,eitherPartymayterminatethisAgreementfor
causeasprovidedhereinabove.
.Subscribermaynotassignanyofitsrightsorobligationshereunder,whetherby
15.ASSIGNMENT
operationoflaworotherwise,withoutthepriorwrittenconsentoftheNetworkOperator(nottobe
unreasonablywithheld).IntheeventofanypurportedassignmentinbreachofthisSection15,the
NetworkOperatorshallbeentitled,atitssolediscretion,toterminatethisAgreementuponwritten
noticegiventoSubscriber.Intheeventofsuchatermination,Subscribershallpayanyunpaid
SubscriptionFeescovering theremainderoftheSubscriptionTermforanyacceptedPurchaseOrders.In
noeventshallanyterminationrelieveSubscriberofanyliabilityforthepaymentofSubscriptionFeesor
SessionProcessingFeesforanyperiodpriortotheterminationdate.Subjecttotheforegoing,this
Agreementshallbindandinuretothebenefitoftheparties,theirrespectivesuccessorsandpermitted
assignsCTIandtheNetworkOperatormayeachassignitsrightsandobligationsunderthisAgreement.
Page13of17
348
Withinninety(90)daysofanysuchassignment,CTIortheNetworkOperator,asthecasemaybe,shall
provide writtennoticetoSubscriberof thefactofsuchassignment.
16.NOAGENCYORPARTNERSHIPCREATEDBYTHISAGREEMENT
.CTI,intheperformanceofthis
Agreement,andinitsroleastheNetworkOperator,,isanindependentcontractor.Inperformingits
obligationsunderthisAgreement,CTIshallmaintaincompletecontroloveritsemployees,its
subcontractorsanditsoperations.Nopartnership,jointventureoragencyrelationshipisintendedby
CTIandanySubscribertobecreatedby thisAgreement.
17.ENTIREAGREEMENT.ThisAgreement,Schedule 1andtheapplicablePurchaseOrdersof
SubscribercontaintheentireagreementbetweenthePartiesandsupersedesandcancelsallprevious
andcontemporaneousagreements,negotiations,commitments,understandings,representationsand
writingsinrespecttothesubjectmatterhereof.Totheextentofanyconflictorinconsistencybetween
thetermsandconditionsofthisAgreementandanyPurchaseOrder,thePurchaseOrdershallprevail.
Notwithstandinganylanguagetothecontrarytherein,notermsorconditionsstatedinanyother
documentation(excludingSchedule 1andPurchaseOrders)shallbeincorporatedintoorformanypart
of thisAgreement,andallsuchpurportedtermsandconditionsshallbenullandvoid.
Page14of17
349
18.COUNTERPARTS
.ThisAgreementmaybeexecutedinoneormorecounterparts,eachofwhich
shallbedeemedanoriginal,butallofwhich,takentogether,shallconstitutebutoneandthesame
document.
COULOMBTECHNOLOGIES,INC.CITYOFCUPERTINO
By:_______________________________By:___________________________________
(Signature)
Name: ____________________________
Name:________________________________
Title: _____________________________
Title:_________________________________
Address:______________________________
City:__________________________________
State:_______ZipCode:________________
E-MailAddressforNotices:________________
______________________________________
(Pleasecomplete Appendix A ifsigningupforFlexBillingService.)
Page15of17
350
1
Schedule 1:SubscriberSessionTransactionFeeSchedule
ForEachChargingSessionusingForEachChargingSessionUsing
FeeScheduleChargePass CardCredit Card
2
Session AuthorizationFee$0.50perSession$0.50perSession
3
SessionProcessingFee7.5%ofSessionFees7.5%ofSessionFees
1
SubscriberisrequiredtoseparatelysubscribefortheChargePoint™NetworkStandardServiceinorderto
activateitsChargingStationson theChargePoint™ Network.
2
TheSessionAuthorizationFeemaynotbeincreasedmorethanonceinany twelve(12)monthperiodnormore
thanthegreaterof(i)tenpercent(10%)or(ii)theConsumerPriceIndexrateofchangepromulgatedbythe
UnitedStateBureau ofLaborStatisticswithrespect to the12-month periodjust thenendedwhen anynotice of
changeisgivenbyCTI to Subscribers.
3
CTImayincreasetheSessionProcessingFeepayablepursuanttothisAgreementatanytimeafterJuly1,2011,
uponnotlessthanonehundredeight(180)daysnotice(the “NoticePeriod”)givenbyelectronicnoticeposted
totheSubscriberPortalandsenttoeachindividualSubscriberAccount,andanysuchchangeshallthereafter
bebindingandenforceablewithrespecttoSubscriberaftertheexpirationofsuchNoticePeriod;provided,
further,thattheSessionProcessingFeemaynotbeincreasedbymorethanonepercentagepointinany
twelve(12)monthperiod,norintheaggregate,increasedtomorethantwentypercent(20.00%)ofSession
Fees at any time.
Page16of17
351
Appendix A:AccountInformationFormforFlexBillingServices
Completeandfaxthisform toCoulomb TechnologiesSalesOperations(+1-214-716-1244)tosignupfor
FlexBillingservices.Allfieldsarerequired(except wherenoted).
BusinessInfo
BusinessLegalName:__________________________________________________________________
BusinessLegalAddress:_________________________________________________________________
(Number)(Street)(City)(State/Province)(PostalCode)(Country)
BusinessFederal TaxID:________________________________________________________________
IndividualPointof Contact
ContactName:_______________________________________________________________________
ContactPhone:_______________________________________________________________________
ContactFax:_________________________________________________________________________
ContactEmailAddress:_________________________________________________________________
BankAccountInfo
BankName:_________________________________________________________________________
BankAddress:________________________________________________________________________
(Number)(Street)(City)(State/Province)(PostalCode)(Country)
BankRoutingnumberorSwiftCode:______________________________________________________
Bank’sAccountnumber(ifapplicable):_____________________________________________________
Business’sAccountNumber:_____________________________________________________________
Business’sAccountName:_______________________________________________________________
(RemitToName,ifdifferentthanBusiness LegalName)
Business’sAccountAddress:____________________________________________________________
(RemitToAddress,ifdifferentthanBusiness LegalAddress)
Business’sFederal TaxID:_______________________________________________________________
(ifRemitToEntityisifdifferentthanBusiness LegalEntity)
AdditionalInformation (for Non-US CustomersOnly)
IntermediaryBankName:______________________________________________________________
IntermediaryBankAddress:_____________________________________________________________
(Number)(Street)(City)(State/Province)(PostalCode)(Country)
IntermediaryBankRoutingorSwiftCode:__________________________________________________
IntermediaryBank’Accountnumberifapplicable:____________________________________________
Page17of17
352
PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3354www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
2011CupertinoBicycleTransportationPlan.
RecommendedAction
AdoptResolutionNo. 11-______,approvingthe2011CupertinoBicycle TransportationPlan.
Discussion
TheCupertinoBicycleTransportationPlanisalong-rangeplanningdocumentdesignedto
encouragebicyclingasasafe,practicalandhealthyalternativetothemotorvehicle.Thecurrent
PlanwasadoptedbytheCityCouncilinDecember, 1998.Sincethattime,thecityhaswitnessed
anincreaseinbicycleusage,aswellasanincreasedemphasisonalternativeformsof
transportationasawaytoreducetrafficcongestionandpromoteenvironmentalsustainability.
Asaresult,overthepasttwoyearstheCupertinoBicyclePedestrianCommissionandCitystaff
havebeenworkingtogethertodevelopanupdatetotheBicycleTransportationPlanthat
addressespresentandfutureneedsofthebicyclingcommunity,sustainability,andsatisfiesthe
requirementsforfundingeligibilityfor bicycleprojects.
The2011CupertinoBicycleTransportationPlanisdividedintofivemainchapters.Chapter2,
Environment,describesCupertino’sclimateandtopography,itsmajorland-usefeatures,and
providesdataonpresentandprojectedbicycleuse.Chapter3,Engineering,describeseachof
theseventeenproposedbikewaysthroughoutCupertino.Chapter4,Encouragement,describes
thewaysinwhichbicyclingcanbeencouragedanddiscussesincentivestobicyclecommuting.
Chapter5,Education,discussesthechallengesposedbycyclistswholackthebasicskillsto
safelyrideabicycleintraffic,andthevariouseducationprogramsandapproachesdesignedto
improvecyclists’safety.Chapter6,Enforcement,focusesontheimportanceandroleoflaw
enforcement officialsincitingcyclistswhofailto observetherules oftheroad.
TheheartofthePlanisChapter3,inwhicheachoftheseventeenproposedbikewaysare
described.Foreachbikeway,theproposeddesignation(bikeroute,bikelane,bicycleboulevard,
etc.),location,adescriptionoftheworktobedone,length,andapproximatecostaregiven.
Proposedimprovementsrangefromsmall,low-costitemssuchasinstallingbikeroutesigns,to
large-scaleprojectssuchasagrade-separatedrailroadcrossing.Additionally,implementationof
manyofthebikewayswillneedtobevettedwiththeneighborhoods,astheymayinvolve
removalofon-streetparking,removalofstopsigns,orprovidingaccessthroughneighborhoods
353
whichcurrentlyhavenothroughaccess.CityCouncil’sadoptionofthe2011Bicycle
TransportationPlanwillallowstafftopursuethefeasibilityoftheindividualbikewaysthrough
detailedengineeringstudy,publicoutreach,andfundingresearch,andthatstaffwillreturnto
Councilforfinalapprovalofeachofthebikewaysindividuallyoncethatworkhasbeendone
andcommunityconcerns have beenmitigatedtotheextent possible.
TheadoptionofaBicycleTransportationPlanisarequirementforajurisdictiontobeeligible
foroutsidefundingfromcertainsources,suchasTransportationDevelopmentAct(TDA)money
administeredthroughtheMetropolitanTransportationCommissionandBicycleTransportation
Account(BTA)moneyadministeredthroughCaltrans.
SustainabilityImpact
Implementationoftheelementsofthe2011BicycleTransportationPlanwillencourage
bicycling,reducerelianceonthesingle-occupancyvehicle,andwillthereforehaveapositive
impactonsustainability.Additionally,adoptingthePlanisconsistentwiththeCirculation
ElementoftheGeneralPlan,GoalB(“IncreasedUseofPublicTransit,Carpools,Bicycling,
Walking,andTelecommuting”)andGoalC(“AComprehensiveNetworkofPedestrianand
BicycleRoutesandFacilities”).
FiscalImpact
ThereisnoimmediatefiscalimpactresultingfromadoptionoftheBicycleTransportationPlan.
However,therewillbeacostassociatedwithimplementingeachoftheproposedimprovements
containedwithinthePlan.Manyofthesmallerimprovementscouldbefundedbyexisting
operatingbudgetswithminimalfiscalimpact.Largerprojectsmayrequireidentifyingspecific
fundingsources,suchasTDAorBTAgrantmoney,andinclusionwithintheCapital
ImprovementProgram.StaffwouldreturntoCouncilatalaterdateforapprovalofindividual
projectsthat havea significantfiscalimpact.
_____________________________________
Preparedby:DavidStillman,SeniorCivil Engineer
Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachments:
A-Resolution
B-BicycleTransportationPlan
354
ATTACHMENTA
RESOLUTIONNO.11-
ARESOLUTIONOF THECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO
APPROVING THE 2011 CUPERTINOBICYCLE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN
WHEREAS,theBicycleTransportationAccountandTransportationDevelopmentActprovide
fundingfor projectsthatimprove safetyandconveniencefor bicycling;and
WHEREAS,alocalagencymusthaveacurrentBicycleTransportationPlantobeeligiblefor
Bicycle TransportationAccountand TransportationDevelopmentActfunds;and
WHEREAS,the2011CupertinoBicycleTransportationPlanhasbeenpreparedbythe
CupertinoBicyclePedestrianCommission,inconjunctionwithCity staff;and
WHEREAS,theCupertinoBicycleTransportationPlancomplieswithCaliforniaStreetsand
HighwaysCodeSection 891.2 andtheSanFranciscoBayAreaRegional TransportationPlan;and
WHEREAS,theCupertinoBicyclePedestrianCommissionrecommendsCityCouncilapproval
ofthe 2011 CupertinoBicycle TransportationPlan.
NOW, THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDthattheCityCouncil oftheCity ofCupertino hereby
approvesthe 2011 CupertinoBicycle TransportationPlan.
PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityofCupertino
th
this 5 day ofApril, 2011, bythefollowing vote:
VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:APPROVED:
_________________________________________________
CityClerkMayor,City ofCupertino
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
OFFICEOFTHE CITY CLERK
CITY HALL
10300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408)777-3223www.cupertino.org
CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT
Meeting:April 5, 2011
Subject
Resignations ofFineArtsCommissionerJoelleLieb,and Technology,Information,and
CommunicationsCommissionerWilliamAllen.
RecommendedAction
Acceptresignationsand,iftheApril 19 Councilmeetingiscancelled, direct staffto setthe
following deadlines:
Application deadline:Friday,April 22, 4:30 p.m.,intheCityClerk’sOffice
Interviews:Tuesday, May 3, 5:00 p.m.,ConferenceRoomA
Discussion
CupertinoResolutionNo. 10-048 statesthat unscheduled vacancies shall be handledinthe
followingmanner:
1.Ifa vacancy occursforan unexpiredtermandinterviewsforappointmenttothat
advisory bodyhavebeenconductedwithinthe previous ninety days,the
unexpiredtermmaybefilledfromthoseapplicationsfollowingtherequired
posting ofthe vacancy.
2.The notice of unscheduled vacancy shall be posted no earlierthan 20 daysbefore
norlaterthan 20 daysafterthe vacancyoccurs,andatleast 10 working days
beforeappointment. The notice of unscheduled vacancymust be postedinthe
OfficeoftheCityClerk,attheCityHall bulletin board,attheCupertinoLibrary,
andin other places designatedbytheCityClerk.
The vacancy noticeswere posted on March 29 andmustremain postedforatleast 10 working
days.Councilcouldmaketheappointments on April 19 fromtheJanuary24interviewlist.
However,ifCouncilchoosestocanceltheApril19meeting,itwill be necessaryto set up
anotherroundofinterviewsatthe May 3 meeting.
423
_____________________________________
Preparedby:
Reviewedby:
ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager
Attachments:
424