The URL can be used to link to this page

5-17-11 Packet.pdfTable of Contents Agenda 2 Accounts Payable for period ending April 22, 2011 Draft Resolution 7 Accounts payable for period ending April 29, 2011 Draft Resolution 18 Accounts Payable for period ending May 6, 2011 Draft Resolution 28 Payroll for period ending April 29, 2011 Draft Resolution 38 Declare brush growing on certain properties a public nuisance and set hearing date for June 7 for objections to proposed removal Draft resolution 39 Municipal Improvements, James R. Courtright and Pamela L. Courtright, 21914 Hermosa Avenue, APN 357-16-048 Staff Report 40 Map 41 Municipal Improvements, Stephen Fung, 21900 Alcazar Avenue, APN 357-14-034 Staff Report 42 Map 43 Garden Gate Sidewalk Installation Project No. 2009-9549 Staff Report 44 Report on the Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade – Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Phase II Trail & 8th Hole Conflict Mitigation Alternatives Staff Report 46 Alternative C-1 50 Alternative C-2 51 Alternative C-3 52 Stevens Creek Corridor Project, Phase II - Funding Report and Authorization to Continue Design Staff Report 53 Alternative 4A 56 Ordinance to regulate smoking in recreational areas Draft Ordinance 57 Report on the Pavement Management Program, Street Conditions, and Preventative Maintenance Staff Report 61 Exhibit A - Deferred Maintenance Cost by Annual Funding Level 67 Exhibit B - Pavement Projects 2001-2009 68 Exhibit C - Pavement Projects 2010 69 Exhibit D - Pavement Project Locations 2011-12 70 1 AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10350 Torre Avenue, Community Hall Council Chamber Tuesday, May 17, 2011 6:00 PM CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL – 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION 1. Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiator (Gov't Code 54956.8); Property: 10346 Scenic Circle Blvd., Cupertino, CA 95014; Negotiator: Carol Atwood; Under negotiation: terms Page: No written materials in packet PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – 6:45 PM ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS – PRESENTATIONS 2. Subject: Proclamation recognizing May 15-21, 2011 as National Public Works Week Recommended Action: Present proclamation Page: No written materials in packet 3. Subject: Presentation from the Cupertino-Hsinchu Sister City organization about the student exchange program Recommended Action: Receive presentation Description: The participants are 15 students from Cupertino Union School District, and Fremont Union middle and high schools Page: No written materials in packet 4. Subject: Presentation from the Public Safety Commission Recommended Action: Receive presentation Page: No written materials in packet 2 Tuesday, May 17, 2011 Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 5. Subject: Accounts Payable for period ending April 22, 2011 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-075 Draft Resolution Page: 6. Subject: Accounts payable for period ending April 29, 2011 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-076 Draft Resolution Page: 7. Subject: Accounts Payable for period ending May 6, 2011 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-077 Draft Resolution Page: 8. Subject: Payroll for period ending April 29, 2011 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-078 Draft Resolution Page: 9. Subject: Declare brush growing on certain properties a public nuisance and set hearing date for June 7 for objections to proposed removal Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-079 Draft resolution Page: 3 Tuesday, May 17, 2011 Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 10. Subject: Municipal Improvements, James R. Courtright and Pamela L. Courtright, 21914 Hermosa Avenue, APN 357-16-048 Recommended Action: Accept Municipal Improvements Description: The work included curb & gutter, driveway approach, and sidewalk improvements Staff Report Map Page: 11. Subject: Municipal Improvements, Stephen Fung, 21900 Alcazar Avenue, APN 357-14-034 Recommended Action: Accept Municipal Improvements Description: The work included curb & gutter and driveway approach improvements Staff Report Map Page: ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) PUBLIC HEARINGS UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 12. Subject: Garden Gate Sidewalk Installation Project No. 2009-9549 Recommended Action: Review bids and award contract to J.J.R. Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Garden Gate Sidewalk Installation Project No. 2009-9549, in the amount of $259,000.00, and approve a construction contingency of $50,000.00 to cover any unforeseen work required to complete the project, for a total of $309,000.00 Staff Report Page: 13. Subject: Report on the Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade – Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Phase II Trail & 8th Hole Conflict Mitigation Alternatives Recommended Action: Receive Report Staff Report Alternative C-1 Alternative C-2 Alternative C-3 Page: 4 Tuesday, May 17, 2011 Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 14. Subject: Stevens Creek Corridor Project, Phase II - Funding Report and Authorization to Continue Design Recommended Action: Authorize staff to continue design and accept the California River Parkways Grant of $1.215 million Staff Report Alternative 4A Page: ORDINANCES 15. Subject: Ordinance to regulate smoking in recreational areas Recommended Action: Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 11-2077: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopting Chapter 10.90 of the Municipal Code to regulate smoking in recreational areas" Draft Ordinance Page: STAFF REPORTS 16. Subject: Report on the Pavement Management Program, Street Conditions, and Preventative Maintenance Recommended Action: Receive Report Staff Report Exhibit A - Deferred Maintenance Cost by Annual Funding Level Exhibit B - Pavement Projects 2001-2009 Exhibit C - Pavement Projects 2010 Exhibit D - Pavement Project Locations 2011-12 Page: COUNCIL REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to Monday, May 23, 3:00 p.m. in the Emergency Operations Center, City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, to conduct a study session on the FY 2011-2012 budget 5 Tuesday, May 17, 2011 Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled for lack of business. The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Any interested person, including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of the city council’s decision with respect to quasi-judicial actions, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the city clerk within ten days after the council’s decision. Any petition so filed must comply with municipal ordinance code §2.08.096. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk’s office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL DECLARING BRUSH GROWING ON CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND SETTING HEARING FOR OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED REMOVAL WHEREAS, brush is growing in the City of Cupertino upon certain streets, sidewalks, highways, roads and private property; and WHEREAS, said brush may attain such growth as to become a fire menace or which are otherwise noxious or dangerous; and WHEREAS, said brush constitutes a public nuisance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: 1. That said brush does now constitute a public nuisance; 2. That said nuisance exists upon all of the streets, sidewalks, highways, roads and private property more particularly described by common names or by reference to the tract, block, lot, code area, and parcel number on the report to be provided by the Agricultural Commissioner; 3. That the 7th day of June, 2011, at the hour of 6:45 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the Council Chamber in the Community Hall, City of Cupertino, are hereby set as the time and place where all property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of such brush may be heard; 4. That the Senior Building Inspector-Agricultural Commissioner is hereby designated and ordered as the person to cause notice of the adoption of this resolution to be given in the manner and form provided in Sections 9.08.040 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the city Council of the City of Cupertino this 17th day of May, 2011 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: __________________________ ____________________________ Kimberly Smith, City Clerk Gilbert Wong, Mayor of Cupertino 39 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: May 17, 2011 Subject Municipal Improvements, James R. Courtright and Pamela L. Courtright, 21914 Hermosa Avenue, APN 357-16-048. Recommended Action Accept Municipal Improvements. Discussion The applicants have completed City-specified improvements in the City right-of-way including curb & gutter, driveway approach, and sidewalk as required by the improvement agreement with the City. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Chad Mosley, Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: Map 40 21800 10197 10149 10101 10085 10065 10053 10204 1019610237 10026 2 2 1 2 6 2 2 1 5 6 22176 2 2 1 5 7 2 2 1 1 6 22086220662204710104 10106 220652185121845 21825 21830 2 1 8 2 0 21815 2170122198 22138 219172190121799219012188521875218652185721881218712186121841218312181521910219002185121825 21835 2180521845 2190421900218102183021820218412185821870219082191210031 10021 10042 10032 10022 10184 2222510120 2221621885 21890 2189521880 21875 2187021860 21850 218691 0 2 4 5 21855 219112184110495 10485 10475 10465 10455 1 0 2 3 7 1 0 2 3 1 100521022710221 1 0 2 2 3 1 0 1 2 2 10120 10112 10110 10005 1001210052 100301004022126221362214622095221052211522125102361 023510252 1 0 2 3 8 22096221062211621915 21910 21905 2183121815 217132188010035 10187 10175 10163 10025 10015 10045 10235 10340 10104 10151 10139 10091 10079 10326 1035410327 10339 10351 10363 10375 10367 10399 10388 21730217202170821700219212192521907216912174021690217452174321741102401014010180 10270 10239 10211 10290 10284 10222 10210 10168 10156 10445 10435 10496 10484 10466 10423 10411 10146 10154 10170 10076 10046 10056 10036 219002186010247 10199 10263 10279 10295 10301 10127 10066 21876218842189221900219102192021930219401009022067221172213722085 22115 2210422084220342205410116 218212183521921219012185521900218682185210049 10075 1039510230 10380 10390 10400 10218 10040 10010 1008010082 10151 10205 10221 1022521660 2165021888218212183721853218692188521901219 1 7 21912219112192121740215902187321811218311001821867218612184521781 21910218902182121845218512184221891218812189821914 21872218102182021840219142192021855218612181121821218462185021870 10052 10056 10070 10135 10120101221012410110101081010610104101021010010405 101341013610138 10132 1016210164101661016810170 101721017410176 101181013010128 1015610178101141011610180101821018410186101881019010192 1015810160 10098 10112 10126 10261 10271 10281 10291 10092 1009410096 10084100861008810090 10050 10353 10355 10357 10361 10360 10370 10354 10350 10330 10300 10290 10280 10270 10475 10465 10455 10445 10435 10425 10415 10020 10480 10470 10460 10450 10440 10430 10420 10410 10057 10073 1020021751217412176210164 10170 10186 10218 10234 10250 21818218002189110266 2177121761216852176010056 10074 10092 10110 10128 10146 218702192521915219092187121865218352181521831216852176121914218202183021836218502190010202 21999 22015 21989 21975 21987 21977 21985 21979 21677217472183121821217572195021970219602192121737217232169710059 218212183721853218692186821852218362182021884218852 1 9 0 1 219062 1 5 9 4 10029 10019 10049 10039 21686216882169221690216802167821696216942168621685 2169621695 217462175621726 21716 21706217152179121793102322168221700216982168410069 10059 21928 10039100291001922008 10109 10089 2183710207 10261 21795219572194721946 2 1 9 5 6 21966 1005810038100181000910049 10276 10284 10310 10320 10330 10340 10350 103602190021958219682196710079 10056 10382 10394 10315 10325 10217 1022522021219912196121931219012193021980219702214522168 1 0 1 9 8 10030 10010 10040 10060 10206 10260 10268 103611017821853218692188521884218682185221836218202 1 9 0 1 2191710175 10141 10155 10165 10071 10095 10101 10121219602200921979219692195921929 21750 21740 10025 10035 100452218822189 10455 10465 10491 10420 10450 10480 10490 10026 1024910081 10061 10041 1006010062 1005210054 10046 10121 10195 10205 10221 1024810190 8085 80818083 8087 10064 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 4 1 0 1 9 0 1 0 1 9 2 1 0 0 5 7 10080100881 0 2 3 0 10201 10191 10181 10171 10161 10151 10141 10131 10121 10111 10170 10160 10150 10140 10080 10090 10100 10110 10120 1 0 2 2 4 1 0 2 2 0 1011010090100661007010156101521013210134101201003810040100601 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 7 5 1 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 3 9 1 0 0 3 7 100332220722211 101312221322210 2220822215 1016110155101351013721790218002181021801218112182121831101361014010150101601017010224102181023910230218012186521861218512181121909 2207910367 10363 10351 21975 21850219302192421914219082190010398 10374 10362 10350 10386 21905219012187510131101711017322017220572206722087 22092 1011910121102121020610188101901019110130101342203222016 10455 10445 10435 10485 10475 10465 10486 10472 10456 10410 104342205622044104222208022068 10446 10442 10432 10125 10135 10145 10165 10290 10330 10072 10060 10230 10111 10185 10195100101003710017 10027 1004710057 10077 10101 10070 10062 10032 10030 10022 10020 10012 10115 1038210372102051045210434 10474 10464 10454 10332 10462 10472 10482 10453 10463 10473 103621035210342 10422 10412 10402 10392 10334 10234 216662167021678216822168622100218102182421836218382184021725217312173921701102 41 1 0 2 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 101 9 0 102 00 102 20 2174121749101811018510187 22050219622199221932219022188421868218522183621820219001007410072 100761007821875 2224021979 2 1 5 9 2 216 48 22168 10068 10118 2183910071 218212162721631216291010710109 10111 10110 10108 10200 101702188421821.52198621822218202187110070 2192121727219182171121771218012173010164 2191110056 10066 1009010270 21646221202209322103221132212310015 216252189110121 10051 10223 10217 217322173421730 21736 21738 21742 21744 10211102151 0 2 2 7 1 0 2 1 5 1 0 1 8 5 2188021866218562185421848194002182010445 21926219202180110421 10411 10381 2181621828218602190910420 10400 2170021800218102186021870216002164021630216202161010182 10164 10148 10132 1011610117 10133 10165 10181 10211 10210 10068 10084 10100218202182121836 10055 10067 10115 10103 2184121856218442184110351 10331 218512184121815219012173610470 2175521710 218812170121703216751024721685101012167221733217272172121737217511006021893218652188521887218611003010028 1003810036 10040 10058 6 10061 2168410135 10141 10130 2168010201 10210 10200 10120 21751217702176610130 10120 10136 10140 216762167410292 10300 21821218212187121733217311030010296 21834217402172021730217101018110185 101771017921920 21925 2190021865218402183521810 21850218382185021697216992169510140 216912173110408 10216 10208 10048 10046 1024110221102352158910218 10232 10228 102382179621760 1026010262 10264 21580 BYRNEORANGEMANNSTEVENS CREEK MCCLELLAN ALCAZARPHAR LAPPASADENALOMITA OLIVEADRIANA SAN FERNANDO ALMADEN DOLORES GRANADA HERMOSA IMPERIALMONTE D E A N OAKVIEW SCENIC NOONAN OAKDELL OAKNOLL GRANADA LOMITA IMPERIALSCENIC¯Subject: Municipal Improvements, James R. Courtright and Pamela L. Courtright, 21914 Hermosa Avenue Recommended Action: Accept Municipal Improvements 41 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: May 17, 2011 Subject Municipal Improvements, Stephen Fung, 21900 Alcazar Avenue, APN 357-14-034. Recommended Action Accept Municipal Improvements. Discussion The applicant has completed City-specified improvements in the City right-of-way including curb & gutter and driveway approach as required by the improvement agreement with the City. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Chad Mosley, Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: Map 42 21800 10204 218512170122198 22138 219172190121799219012188521875218652185721881218712186121841218312181521910219002185121825 21835 2180521845 2190421900218102183021820218412185821870219082191210031 10021 10042 10032 1002222225 21869219112184110495 10485 10475 10465 10455 1 0 1 2 2 10120 10112 10110 10005 1001210052 1003010040221262213622146220952210522115221252209622106221162183121815 217132188010035 10187 10175 10163 10025 10015 10045 10235 10340 10104 10151 10139 10091 10079 10326 1035410327 10339 10351 10363 10375 10367 10399 10388 21730217202170821700219212192521907216912174021690217452174321741102401014010180 10270 10239 10211 10290 10284 10222 10210 10168 10156 10445 10435 10496 10484 10466 10423 10411 219002186010247 10199 10263 10279 10295 10301 10127 10066 218762188421892219002191021920219302194010090 2182121835219212190121855942 934 926 918 910 902 10049 10075 1039510230 10380 10390 10400 10218 10040 10010 1008010082 10151 10205 10221 10225 9482191121921 217402187321811218311001821867218612184521781 21910218902182121845218512184221891218812189821914 21872218102182021840219142192021855218612181121821218462185021870 10052 10056 10070 10135 10120101221012410110101081010610104101021010010405 101341013610138 10132 1016210164101661016810170 101721017410176 101181013010128 10156101541015210178101141011610180101821018410186101881019010192 1015810160 10098 10112 10126 8093809981078115812110261 10271 10281 10291 10092 1009410096 10084100861008810090 10050 10353 10355 10357 10361 10360 10370 10354 10350 10330 10300 10290 10280 10270 10475 10465 10455 10445 10435 10425 10415 10020 8129813981478157219252197521885218952190521835218452186521875219652178521795218052182521765816581758183819110480 10470 10460 10450 10440 10430 10420 10410 10057 10073 10200 2208510797 22115 22105 2 2 1 0 622116 10786 22066 10618 1070621751217412176221818218002189121771217612168521760218702192521915219092187121865218352181521831216852176121914218202183021836218502190010640 10630 10650 10620 21999 22015 21997 22017 21995 22019 2 2 0 6 7 22027 2 2 0 2 9 2 2 0 4 7 2 2 0 4 9 2 2 0 4 5 2 2 0 5 5 2 2 0 7 9 21989 21975 21987 21977 21985 21979 22035 22025 2 2 0 7 7 2 2 0 5 7 2 2 0 5 9 2 2 0 7 5 2 2 0 6 5 2 2 0 6 9 216772 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 5 4 2 2 0 1 8 2 2 0 3 8 2174721840 21831218212175721976219502197021960 21988 219842198221980 21972 21921217102173721723 216972 2 1 6 8 2 2 1 8 1 222012 2 1 9 42 2 2 0 4 2 2 1 9 1 10059 10029 10019 10049 10039 919 925 931926 920 912 906 932 905 911216862168821692216902168021678216962169421686216852169621695217462175621726 21716 21706217152179121793102322168221700216982168410207 10261 2179510276 10284 10310 10320 10330 10340 10350 10360 10056 10382 10394 10315 10325 10217 10225 10206 10260 10268 103611017810175 10141 10155 10165 10071 10095 10101 10121 21750 21740 10025 10035 10045 917 923 929930 10455 10465 10491 10420 10450 10480 10490 924 918 910 904903 909 10026 102498133 8131 8125 8127 81238121 81178119 8130 10727107371074781138115 1006010062 1005210054 10046 10121 10195 10205 10221 1024810190 8129 8085 80818083 80898087 8086 8084 8082 8132 8134 81118109 81058107 10064 81038101 80998097 8095 8093 8091 10726 107 0 6 106 9 6 106 8 6 932 924925 9332220722205 220311075022211 916 9088093909 91781238117 8111809922195 22139221492215922185 10131 221569399408187819581598179817381658151814581378131 2203622119221292207622066220562210022215 22186221762216610701 10703 221462210621790218002181021801218112182121831218012186521861218512181121909 2207910367 10363 10351 21975 21850219302192421914219082190010398 10374 10362 10350 10386 21905219012187522017220572206722087 22092 2203222016 10455 10445 10435 10485 10475 10465 10486 10472 10456 10410 104342205622044104222208022068 10446 10442 10432 10125 10135 10145 10165 10330 10072 10060 10230 10111 10185 10195100101003710017 10027 1004710057 10077 10101 10070 10062 10032 10030 10022 10020 10012 10115 1038210372 10452 10434 10474 10464 1045410453 10463 10473 103621035210342 10422 10412 10402 10392 10234 2166621670216782168221686221002181021824218362183821840220501070510711107151072510735107551007410072 10076 106551007821875 2224021979 216 48 22168 10068 2183910071 2182121821.52198621822218202187110070 2 2 0 0 0 21921217272191821711217302191110056 10066 1009021646221202209322103221132212310015 107652189110121 10051 10223 10217 217322173421730 21736 21738 21742 21744 2188021866218562185421848194002182010445 21926219202180110421 10411 10381 2181621828218602190910420 10400 217002180021810218602187010055 10067 10115 10103 2184121856218442184110351 10331 218512184121815219012173610470 2175522096 22086 22076221261071610726107361074610756 10766107171072710737107471075710767107771078722003107512194510796 1071121710 218812170121703216751024721685101012167221733217272172121737217511006021893218652188521887218611003010028 1003810036 10040 10058 12 11 4 6 5 10061 2168410135 10141 10130 2168010201 10210 10200 10120 21751217702176610130 10120 10136 10140 216762167410292 10300 21821218212187121733217311030010296 21834217402172021730217101018110185218502183821850 21697216992169510140 216912173110408 10216 10208 10048 10046 10218 10232 10228 102382179621760 1026010262 10264 21580 BYRNEORANGEMCCLELLAN R AE ALCAZAR HYANNISPORTPASADENALOMITA OLIVE SAN FERNANDO PRESIDIO ALMADEN DOLORES GRANADA HERMOSA IMPERIALSCENIC LIN D A VISTA D E A N FORT BAKERTR ESSLER NOONAN MADRIDOLD TOWNLOMITA IMPERIALGRANADA SCENIC¯Subject: Municipal Improvements, Stephen Fung, 21900 Alcazar Avenue Recommended Action: Accept Municipal Improvements 43 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: May 17, 2011 Subject Garden Gate Sidewalk Installation Project No. 2009-9549. Recommended Action Review bids and award contract to J.J.R. Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Garden Gate Sidewalk Installation Project No. 2009-9549, in the amount of $259,000, and approve a construction contingency of $50,000 to cover any unforeseen work required to complete the project, for a total of $309,000. Discussion In 2009, the City was awarded $393,788 in federal funding as a result of a successful Safe Routes to School application submitted by the City to enhance safety for pedestrians walking to Garden Gate Elementary School and De Anza College. The scope of the project included constructing new sidewalks where there were gaps in the existing sidewalk network along Stelling Road between Alves Drive and Highway 280, along Greenleaf Drive between Stelling Road and Garden Gate Elementary School, and along Flora Vista Avenue in the vicinity of Greenleaf Drive; constructing new handicap ramps and upgrading existing handicap ramps; and performing a safety upgrade of the traffic signal at Stelling Road/Greenleaf Drive. Subsequent to being awarded the funding, the project scope was amended to include driveway apron reconstruction in order to bring the route up to full Americans with Disabilities Act compliance. The current contract is for construction of the sidewalks, handicap ramps, and driveways. The traffic signal upgrade will be performed under separate contract. The work will be performed during the summer of 2011 during the Garden Gate Elementary School summer recess in order to minimize impacts to pedestrians. The City publicly opened bids from five bidders on May 10, 2011 at 2:15 p.m. in the Community Hall. The Apparent Low Bid was provided by J.J.R. Construction, Inc. Staff reviewed the documents provided by J.J.R. Construction, Inc. and found them to be Responsive and Responsible in accordance with the State Contract Code. The tabulation of bids, including the Engineer’s Estimate, is provided below. J.J.R. Construction’s bid is well below the Engineer’s Estimate for the work. Bidder Bid Robert A. Bothman, Inc. $408,400.00 Engineer’s Estimate $405,000.00 SpenCon Construction, Inc. $404,402.50 44 Jos. J. Albanese, Inc. $387,363.00 Nor-Cal Concrete $318,570.00 J.J.R. Construction, Inc. $259,000.00 Sustainability Impact Not applicable. Fiscal Impact A project budget of $442,000 was approved by City Council in the 09/10 CIP. This money is being reimbursed through the Federal Safe Routes to School Grant, in the amount of $393,788. The total project cost, including contingencies, is $309,000. Consequently, there is no net fiscal impact to the City. _____________________________________ Prepared by: David Stillman, Senior Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: None 45 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: May 17, 2011 Subject Report on the Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade – SCCP Phase II Trail & 8th Hole Conflict Mitigation Alternatives. Recommendation Receive Report. Discussion In June of 2010, Council approved the CIP for fiscal year 2010/2011. The FY 10/11 CIP included a $550,000 project to upgrade the 40 year old irrigation system at the golf course. The existing irrigation system is the original that was installed by the former private owner in the early 1960s. Over the years, the lines, joints and sprinkler heads have deteriorated and cracked to such an extent that leaks and operational repairs are frequent and expensive. With the recent large increases in the cost of water, it has also become imperative to make the system more efficient. The golf course was originally irrigated with water taken from a well, constructed in the 1940s, located at the back of the concession stand in Blackberry Farm. The water was pumped upstream to a large steel holding tank and then pumped back down to the golf course irrigation lines. In 2002, the tank bottom and side wall were discovered to have rusted out beyond repair and it was taken out of service. Irrigation of the golf course was then switched over to the City’s potable water system from San Jose Water Company. During construction of SCCP Phase I, the tank was removed and recycled. Before construction of SCCP Phase I, the golf course ponds were fed directly from an “intake gallery” on the bank of Stevens Creek, near the current educational access point. The gallery was positioned near the bottom of the creek but during low creek flow in the summer months, very little and sometimes no water flowed into the ponds. This irregular and low flow of water contributed to the choking growth of cattails in the ponds. The alternative domestic water source was also considered too expensive to use as a water source for the ponds and very little was ever used. The ponds will continue to deteriorate until they are cleaned out and a new water source is provided. 46 When the golf course irrigation project was under consideration, staff from Parks and Recreation and Public Works began to consider the possibility of reactivating the well and using the water to fill the ponds, with the potential of using that pond water to irrigate the golf course. The City is still has water rights to the well water, as determined by the former City Attorney. A water line was installed in Phase I between the well and the upper pond in anticipation of one day using the well water to fill the ponds. The proximity conflict between the 8th hole and the trail for Phase II is made more difficult by the location of the lower pond, reducing the alternatives for additional separation. Parks & Recreation staff have long had the desire to clean up the lower pond and reconfigure it to a better shape and size. The Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade project was seen as an ideal opportunity to not only reconfigure the pond for irrigation purposes, but to also change its shape to allow more space between the 8th hole and the trail. Unfortunately, the Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade project is not sufficiently funded to accomplish all of the goals stated above. The original $550,000 budget was established to replace the main and lateral irrigation lines, provide new sprinkler heads and automated controllers, clean out the ponds, and reactivate the well to fill the ponds. For this limited scope of work, the budget is sufficient. Following Council’s direction to investigate alternatives to mitigate the potential conflicts with the 8th hole and the trail, staff conducted a “design charrette” with key design members of both the Phase II project and the Irrigation project. That all day effort produced several golf course reconfiguration alternatives and cost estimates that address all of the goals listed below: · Reduce or eliminate the impact of the trail location on the 8th hole · Replace the outdated and inefficient irrigation lines · Fill the ponds with less expensive natural water rather than expensive domestic water · Rehabilitate the ponds and create native habitat · Use the ponds as an irrigation reservoir and line them to reduce water leakage · Substantially reduce the annual water bill for irrigation · Prevent chlorinated water from potentially entering into Stevens Creek The design team identified three concepts that accomplish all of the goals listed above (Attachments C-1, C-2 and C-3). They range in cost between $1.1M and $1.25M, of which the City has already budgeted $550K. The budget shortfall ranges between $550K and $700K. Given that the shortfall is a substantial amount of additional money, staff looked into the possibilities of breaking the project into basic elements relative to potential savings in annual operational expenses. The cost of watering the golf course this past year was about $60,000. In 2002, when the irrigation water source was switched over to San Jose Water, the annual cost was about $30,000, 47 because 40% of the water was supplied by the well and the other 60% came from San Jose Water, which has generally cost twice as much as well water. In 2001, relying almost entirely on well water, we paid only $19,000 to irrigate the golf course. The current irrigation upgrade project, budgeted at $550,000, will replace all the irrigation lines and may reduce the annual expense of water by about 15% by preventing leaks and inefficient watering cycles. It will also reactivate the well head and allow water back into the two existing ponds, but it does not include the funds necessary to prevent the ponds from leaking. Substantially higher savings in water costs can be achieved by changing the source from domestic water back to well water. This change might result in an initial 55% savings, or about $35,000. The cost of the well water is not likely to be subject to dramatic annual increases like those forecast for domestic water. Irrigating the golf course requires a little more than 16 million gallons of water per year. Approximately 90% of that water is consumed during the six months of May 1st through October 31st. The following alternatives provide outline scopes of work and budget shortfall information for consideration. It should be noted that Alternatives A and B will continue to rely entirely upon domestic water from San Jose Water Company for the golf course irrigation requirements. Alternative A This project is currently scoped and underway. It includes the reactivation of the existing well head, the rehabilitation of the ponds, and the replacement of the irrigation main line and the laterals, sprinkler heads and controllers. The well water will be pumped to the upper pond and allowed to run down to the lower pond. The lower pond will no longer overflow into the creek, but should that happen inadvertently, the water will not have any potential to contaminate the creek or harm the fish. It is currently budgeted at $550,000 and scheduled for completion in the fall of 2012. Shortfall: none Alternative B This alternative would include reactivating the well head, cleaning the ponds, replacing the irrigation main line and laterals, sprinkler heads and controllers, and making minor adjustments to the 8th hole tee box, fairway, and green. The lower pond would be reconfigured to allow the entire 8th hole to move further away from the anticipated trail alignment. The lower pond would be prevented from overflowing into the creek as in Alternative A, but would need additional funding of about $75,000 for a project total of $625,000. Shortfall: $75,000 Alternative C-1 This alternative is fundamentally different from the previous two in that the upper existing pond would be converted to a bio-swale and the lower existing pond would be completely reconfigured into a single 350,000 gallon reservoir lake, fed by the well head. The reservoir lake would then supply regular irrigation water through a series of pumps and supply lines to a new irrigation system of mains, laterals, sprinkler heads and automated controllers. The potable 48 water system would remain connected as a backup for emergencies or short term low flow conditions. In this alternative, the 8th hole would be moved a little bit further away from the Phase II trail alignment. See Attachment. It is projected to cost $1,100,000. Shortfall: $550,000 Alternative C-2 This alternative is different from C-1 in that the lower lake would be reconfigured into two separate lakes, with one of the lakes being located between a re-located 8th hole and the anticipated trail alignment. The lakes would together provide the reservoir capacity for the irrigation system and would be connected to each other by an underground pipe. See Attachment. It is projected to cost $1,175,000. Shortfall: $625,000 Alternative C-3 This two lake alternative is different from, and more expensive than, C-2 in that holes 5, 6, 7, and 8 are reconfigured and played in the reverse direction with rebuilt tees and greens that need improvement now. The reverse play of hole #5 reduces the need for ball protection on or near the bridge and also provides good separation from the trail. The lake configuration is also deemed to be a little more challenging. See Attachment. It is projected to cost about $1,250,000. Shortfall: $700,000 Sustainability Impact Any one of the Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade alternatives will fully support the City’s sustainability goals. ____________________________________ Prepared by: Terry W. Greene, City Architect Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Mark Linder, Director of Parks and Recreation Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: Alternatives C-1, C-2, and C-3 49 #7 - No change#5 - No change#5 tee#5 green#7 tee#7 green#6 - No change#6 tee#6 greenbioswaleIrrigation pond#8 (112 yds) - No change in yardage#8 tee#8 green#4 green#4 tee#4 - No changeStevens CreekStevens CreekProposed bridgeProposed trailScale: N.T.SBlackberry Farm parking lotBlackberry Farm parking lotMay 17, 2011Blackberry Farm Golf CourseCity of CupertinoALTERNATIVE C -150 #7 - No change#5 - No change#5 tee#5 green#7 tee#7 green#6 - No change#6 tee#6 greenbioswaleIrrigation pond#8 (122 yds) #8 tee#8 green#4 green#4 tee#4 - No changeStevens CreekStevens CreekProposed bridgeProposed trailIrrigation pondNative tree protective plantingScale: N.T.SALTERNATIVE C-2Blackberry Farm parking lotBlackberry Farm parking lotMay 17, 2011Blackberry Farm Golf CourseCity of Cupertino51 #6 (68 yds)#8 (203 yds)#8 tee#7 (117 yds)#6 greenbioswaleIrrigation pond#5 (118 yds) #5 tee#5 green#4 green#4 tee - extended 10 yds#4 (282 yds)Stevens CreekStevens CreekProposed bridgeProposed trail#6 tee#8 greenIrrigation pond#7 tee#7 greenScale: N.T.SALTERNATIVE C-3Blackberry Farm parking lotBlackberry Farm parking lotMay 17, 2011Blackberry Farm Golf CourseCity of Cupertino52 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: May 17, 2011 Subject Stevens Creek Corridor Project, Phase II-Funding Report and Authorization to Continue Design. Recommendation Authorize staff to continue design and accept the California River Parkways Grant of $1.215 million. Discussion On January 18, 2011, Council received a report with recommended actions for the Stevens Creek Corridor Project, (SCCP) Phase II. The report advised Council of a $1.2M grant that had been awarded to the City several months earlier if the project scope was expanded to include creek restoration. Council authorized: · Staff to initiate the design effort for Alternative 4A (Attachment 1) · The City Manager to execute a design agreement with SSA Landscape Architects for design fees not to exceed $200,000 · The City Manager to issue Letters of Intent to granting agencies · Staff to initiate an environmental clearance process for the project · Staff to conduct public meetings and outreach efforts to collect project related concerns On March 15 and April 5, 2011, Council considered several bridge location alternatives and agreed on the Base Alignment depicted in the original CEQA documents and to a general trail alignment that respected both the privacy setback of approximately 100 feet from the Meadows residential area and a reasonable riparian area adjacent to the creek and backwater. Council also expressed concern about the close proximity of the trail with the 8th hole of the golf course and directed staff to study potential mitigation alternatives. Several of those alternatives will be discussed in another item on this meeting’s agenda. This report provides an update on the potential funding sources and the shortfall for the overall project, still estimated to cost $3.5M. This cost does not include additional money that may be necessary to mitigate concerns regarding the trail/golf course conflict. In January of 2011, Council was provided a chart of funding sources and potential funds. This report updates that chart and provides budget shortfall information for Council consideration at the CIP study session on May 23rd, the CIP public hearing on June 7th, and the CIP adoption on June 21st. 53 Funding Sources and Shortfall Staff anticipates that the shortfall of SCCP Phase II may be met with CIP savings, awarded grants, park dedication fees, and some amount of General Fund. Staff is also continuing to actively pursue grant funding from a variety of sources. Existing and potential grant funding sources for SCCP Phase II are provided below: Source Funding Status Conditions for Use Park Dedication Fees $200,000 Received can use for creek or trail Ca River Parkways Grant 1,215,000 Awarded can use for creek & trail State EEMP Grant 245,000 Awarded CEQA complete by Nov. 2011 VTA Project Readiness 25,000 Awarded Agreement executed TDA Grant 103,000 Awarded Documentation in progress Total Grant/Fee Funding 1,788,000 Project Budget 3,500,000 Shortfall $1,712,000 Staff believes the shortfall of $1,712,000 can be provided from City funds over the next two years should Council be willing to use funds from several sources including some of the current CIP savings. Potential sources and amounts are shown below. Potential City Funding Sources Likelihood General Fund Savings (Completed Projects) $430,000 Sure General Fund Savings (Project Deferrals/Reductions) 450,000 Sure (other proj. impacts) Parks & Recreation Funds (Project Deferrals/Reductions) 400,000 Sure (other proj. impacts) Park Dedication Fees 1,400,000 Hopeful (unknown when) General Fund Savings (Project Deferrals/Reductions) 850,000 Hopeful Total City Funding $3,530,000 The prospect of obtaining the $1.4M in park dedication fees from the Rose Bowl Development is becoming more somewhat more likely as the economy improves. In addition, staff has learned that the Santa Clara Valley Water District Board will consider about $850,000 in grant funds for Phase II as a part of its annual capital project allocations in June. In the initial scoring, the project was rated highest in both of the participating categories. If these funds materialize, the City could reimburse the General Fund. Schedule The project design effort is still underway and will continue through the end of June. With Council’s approval to move the project forward, the City will execute the agreement for the $1.215M grant funds from the State for California River Parkways. 54 Conclusion The issues before Council if it decides to move forward with the project are to decide on the appropriate combination of the following: · take the savings from completed General Fund projects, · take savings from the deferral of currently budgeted General Fund projects · take savings from the deferral of currently budgeted Recreation Funded projects, · continue with project and rely on Water District grants and/or Park Impact Fees Sustainability Impact SCCP, Phase II, fully supports the City’s sustainability goals. Fiscal Impact It is assumed that the City will need to front the money for the project and reimburse the General Fund when grant money is received. The project currently has $1.4M in approved funds for the FY 10/11 CIP. It is expected that about $1.5M of the total $3.5M project budget would be sufficient throughout all of 2011 and most of 2012, for design and permitting. The balance of $2.0M would be necessary, possibly in late 2012 but certainly in 2013, for construction and construction phase services. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Terry W. Greene, City Architect Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: Alternative 4A (Attachment 1) 55 Original Alternative 4A Layout Attachment 1 56 ORDINANCE NO. 11-___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ADOPTING CHAPTER 10.90 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE SMOKING IN RECREATIONAL AREAS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, tobacco use causes death and disease and continues to be an urgent public health challenge, and WHEREAS, exposure to secondhand smoke anywhere has negative health impacts, and exposure to secondhand smoke does occur at significant levels outdoors, and WHEREAS, cigarette butts pose a health threat to young children and others, and WHEREAS, cigarette butts are a major and persistent source of litter and constitute a fire hazard, and WHEREAS, creating smoke free areas helps protect the health of the 86.7% of Californians who are nonsmokers and WHEREAS, state law prohibits smoking within 25 feet of playgrounds and tot lots and expressly authorizes local communities to enact additional restrictions. NOW THEREFORE, it is the intent of the City Council, in enacting this ordinance, to provide for the public health, safety, and welfare by discouraging the inherently dangerous behavior of smoking around non-tobacco users, especially children; by protecting the public from exposure to secondhand smoke where they play, exercise, and relax; by protecting the environment from tobacco-related litter; by reducing the potential for children to wrongly associate smoking with a healthy lifestyle; and by affirming and promoting a healthy environment in and around the City’s recreational areas. Section I. Code Amendment. Chapter 10.90 of the Cupertino Municipal Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: Sec. 10.90.010 Definitions. The following words and phrases, whenever used in this chapter, shall have the meanings defined in this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (a) “Parking Area” means a parking lot or any other area designated or primarily used for parking vehicles of Persons accessing a Recreational Area. (b) “Recreational Area” means any outdoor area, including streets and sidewalks adjacent to Recreational areas, owned or operated by the City of Cupertino and open to the general 57 public for recreational purposes, regardless of any fee or age requirement. The term “Recreational Area” includes, but is not limited to parks, picnic areas, playgrounds, sports fields, golf courses, walking paths, gardens, hiking trails, bike paths, horseback riding trails, swimming pools, roller-skating rinks, and skateboard parks. (c) “Smoke” means the gases, particles, or vapors released into the air as a result of combustion, or vaporization, when the apparent or usual purpose of the combustion, or vaporization is human inhalation of the byproducts, except when the combusting or vaporizing material contains no tobacco or nicotine and the purpose of inhalation is solely olfactory, such as, for example, smoke from incense. The term “Smoke” includes, but is not limited to, tobacco smoke, and marijuana smoke. (d) “Smoking” means engaging in an act that generates Smoke, such as for example: possessing a lighted pipe, lighted hookah pipe, , a lighted cigar, or a lighted cigarette of any kind; or; or lighting or igniting of a pipe, cigar, hookah pipe, or cigarette of any kind. Sec. 10.90.020 Smoking Prohibited (a) Smoking is prohibited anywhere in a Recreational Area and twenty-five (25) feet from the boundaries thereof, or in any parking area adjacent to the Recreational area. The 25 foot prohibition does not apply to adjacent private property. (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit Smoking in any area in which such Smoking is already prohibited by state or federal law unless the applicable state or federal law does not preempt additional local regulation. (c) No Person shall dispose of used Smoking waste within the boundaries of an area in which Smoking is prohibited by this chapter. (d) Each instance of Smoking in violation of this chapter shall constitute a separate violation. For violations other than Smoking, each day of a continuing violation of this chapter shall constitute a separate violation. Sec. 10.90.030 Other Requirements and Prohibitions (a) No ash can, ashtray, or other Smoking waste receptacle shall be placed in any area in which Smoking is prohibited by this chapter. (b) No Person shall dispose of used Smoking waste within the boundaries of an area in which Smoking is prohibited by this chapter. (c) The presence of Smoking waste receptacles in violation of subsection (a) above or the absence of signs shall not be a defense to a violation of any provision of this chapter. (d) Each instance of Smoking in violation of this chapter shall constitute a separate violation. For violations other than Smoking, each day of a continuing violation of this 58 chapter shall constitute a separate violation. Sec. 10.90.040 Violation - Penalty (a) The remedies provided by this article are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity. Except as otherwise provided, enforcement of this chapter is at the sole discretion of the City of Cupertino. Nothing in this chapter shall create a right of action in any person against the City of Cupertino or its agents to compel public enforcement of this article against any party. (b) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as provided in Chapter 1.12 or, in the alternative, subject to enforcement action pursuant to Chapter 1.10: Administrative Citations, Fines, and Penalties. Section 2. Statement of Purpose. This Ordinance is intended to prohibit smoking and smoking litter in recreational areas in order to limit resident exposure to second hand smoke. Section 3. Severability. Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after adoption as provided by Government Code Section 36937. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall give notice of its adoption as required by law. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36933, a summary of this Ordinance may be published and posted in lieu of publication and posting of the entire text. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Council the _____ day of __________ and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Council the _____day of __________ 2011 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: 59 ATTEST: APPROVED: ______ ______________ Kimberly Smith, City Clerk Gilbert Wong, Mayor, City of Cupertino 60 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: May 17, 2011 Subject Report on the Pavement Management Program, Street Conditions, and Preventative Maintenance. Recommended Action Receive Report. Discussion The City is responsible for maintaining a network of approximately 142 miles of paved streets. Comprising this network are 34 miles of arterials, 14 miles of collectors and 94 miles of residential streets. To further recognize the variability of the street network, each of these miles is further divided into over 900 separate management segments. Each year, the Public Works Department develops and implements an annual pavement maintenance plan based on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) street condition rating methodology, available funds, and other criteria that help set priorities. Staff submits this annual pavement management report to Council to describe current pavement conditions, anticipated future pavement conditions at various funding levels and to provide an overview of the pavement maintenance projects planned for FY 2011/12. Program and Funding Overview The 2011 pavement management report rates the overall pavement condition index (PCI) of our street network at 71 out of a possible 100. It is best not to equate these rating numbers with high school scores. A PCI of 100 would be representative of a new street in outstanding condition. A PCI of 71 is still at the lower range of a “Very Good” pavement condition. This condition is based upon information collected by physical observation and measurements in the field conducted in the summer of 2010 for the biennial Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. The MTC receives pavement information from the City of Cupertino and 100+ other public agencies. To stay current with the requirements established by the MTC, the City is required to conduct periodic inspections of the street network and to certify the condition. This was last completed and submitted to MTC in December 2010. The report states that in order to maintain a PCI of 71, an expenditure of approximately $2.4 Million per year would be required. It is also noted in the report that expenditures sufficient to maintain a PCI does not necessarily reduce the amount of deferred spending. Deferred spending is defined as the accumulated dollars not spent in providing all required preventative maintenance. For illustration, refer to Exhibit A . 61 Funding levels in FY 2010-2011 for the City’s pavement management program declined to about $1.55 Million from approximately $2.05 Million the previous year. Whereas the City received $800,000 in ARRA and $500,000 in Proposition 42 funds to supplement City general fund (GF) monies of $750,000 for pavement management in FY 2009-2010, $800,000 in Proposition 1B funds was the only supplement to the $750,000 local GF allocation in FY 2010-11. Although the City expects to receive approximately $500,000 in Local Streets and Roads funds from federal sources in FY 2012-2013, there are no outside funds expected to supplement the local GF allocation of $750,000 in FY 2011-2012. Pavement Conditions The City uses the latest version of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Pavement Management System StreetSaver® software. StreetSaver is an effective tool at predicting future budget needs and at providing generalized recommendations regarding future pavement treatments. Using this type of program is needed to remain eligible to receive outside funding. This software, along with other information collected in the field, enables staff to recommend street network treatments that accomplish timely preventative work today, while reducing the amount of costly rehabilitative work in the future. PCI’s for the City pavement network are based on a visual rating system that quantifies seven pavement condition types. The overall condition of Cupertino’s street pavement is in the lower range of MTC’s designation “Very Good.” Cupertino’s average PCI condition value by street classification is as follows: Table 1 CLASSIFICATION 2010 PCI* Arterial 77 Collector 74 Residential Local 68 TOTAL SYSTEM 71 *Calculated by an algorithm developed by the Army Corps of Engineers Table 2 describes the condition categories, their equivalent PCI range, and typical prescribed maintenance treatments. The maintenance treatment suggested in Table 2 is based on PCI scores and the corresponding condition category. Streets with PCI scores over 90 are considered to be in excellent condition and require only preventative treatment. Streets with scores from 70 to 89 are considered “Very Good”, but may require cracks to be filled or slurry seals. Streets with scores from 50 to 69 are considered “Good”, but may require a thicker cape seal or a thin asphalt overlay. Streets with scores from 25 to 49 are considered “Poor” and generally require a mill and asphalt overlay. Streets with scores below 25 are “Very Poor” and are in need of surface reconstruction. 62 Table 2 Condition PCI Range Typical Maintenance Treatment Excellent 90-100 Do Nothing. Very Good 70-89 Crack Fill / Slurry Seal Good 50-69 Crack Fill / Cape Seal / Thin AC Overlay Poor 25-49 AC Overlay Very Poor 0-24 Reconstruct Structure (AC) The categories of treatments corresponding to Table 2 that Cupertino typically uses are as follows: Scrub cracked pavement surfaces that are not yet actually breaking apart. Cost Treatment Description Lowest Slurry Seal This work consists of applying a mixture of emulsified oil, rock, water, and additives to the pavement surface. Slurry seals are used for sealing aged and worn pavements, filling minor cracks, restoring skid resistance and restoring aesthetic appeal. This application serves to protect and preserve the pavement surface and extend its useful life. Cape Seal This work is the combination of two sealing and rehabilitation methods, chip seal and slurry seal. First a chip seal is applied, which is a hot asphalt spray binder with rock. It is then followed within a few days by a slurry seal. While more expensive, this combination method provides an additional measure of pavement surface durability and has more restorative impact on the pavement than a straight slurry seal. The only downside is that in the period between the chip seal and the slurry seal, sometimes the small aggregate may become loose and it create a nuisance for drivers. Thin Maintenance Overlay (TMO) After cracks and potholes in the road surface are sealed or filled, and a tack coat is applied, a thin overlay (typically up to 1.5”) of asphalt is placed on the street surface. This treatment can extend the useful life of a street section that is still structurally sound by several years. In terms of extending the time until a pavement needs structural rehabilitation, this treatment is more effective than a cape seal. Pavement Overlay An overlay consists of placing an additional asphalt pavement layer (generally 2” to 3”) on top of the existing street surface. This method is typically used in combination with surface milling, i.e., the grinding of several inches of the existing pavement and either re-using the grindings with hot oil additives or replacing it with a new layer of asphalt pavement. This is the most comprehensive resurfacing method used to restore structural integrity. Structural Reconstruction This process typically involves grinding and recompacting the pavement structural section to a considerable specified depth and applying additional base material and a new thick asphaltic concrete surface. Highest Note: Removal and replacement of failed asphalt may be needed for most treatments. This is a limited project treatment that is designed to repair particular sections of pavement where it is not required for the entire street to be overlaid or sealed. This work consists of digging out and replacing discrete areas of the pavement that have failed, or are about to fail, structurally. 63 The following chart illustrates the cost effectiveness of keeping the pavement condition index above 70 for a typical street. Pavement Age (Years) Our current PCI is being reduced annually based on this deterioration curve. Maintenance activities increase the PCI value as they are applied to the segment. As shown in the above picture, a typical pavement section will deteriorate approximately 40% in the first 75% of its lifespan, but then will begin to degrade rapidly. As a result of this continued deterioration, the quantity and cost of the maintenance activities needed to rehabilitate the pavement will increase in both scope and costs. In other words, it is not simply “pay today or pay tomorrow”, but rather a “pay today or pay more tomorrow” proposition. Overall pavement maintenance cost is reduced by the timely application of crack sealing, fog seals, slurry seals and pavement overlays before the subgrade fails and total pavement reconstruction is required. For the biennial study just certified by the MTC, the Budget Needs Average is $6.6 million per year. After the Budget Needs have been calculated, Budget Scenarios are run to determine the funding levels required to maintain and/or improve the current PCI level and generate a list of street maintenance for the next seven (7) years. The software analyzes each pavement section and picks specific maintenance to maximize the improvement of the entire pavement system. Maintenance treatments are allocated to as many streets as the annual budget will allow. These budgets do not account for stopgap maintenance repairs, such as emergency pothole repair. PAVEMENT LIFE CYCLE (90) POOR (25) AC OVERLAY GOOD (50) PAVEMENT RECOMMENDED TREATMENT PAVEMENT Condition SLURRY SEAL ($3.40/SQ.YD.) EXCELLENT VERY GOOD (70) 40% DROP IN CAPE SEAL / TMO / AC OVERLAY ($3.40-$20.00/SQ.YD.) RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) ($110.00-$115.00/SQ.YD.) 75% OF 4 8 12 20 16 (Approx. PCI) 40% QUALITY QUALITY ($20.00-$34.00/SQ. YD.) VERY POOR (0) 64 Pavement Maintenance Funding Needs With the addition of outside sources, the City has been able over the last few years to come near the $2.4 Million total mentioned above that is necessary to sustain an overall PCI of 71. Pavement Funding Trend 2007-2011 Fiscal Year (FY) Total Pavement Funds Available 2007-2008 $2.38 Million 2008-2009 $2.17 Million 2009-2010 $2.05 Million 2010-2011 $1.55 Million Total $8.15 Million Approximate Four-Year Average $2.04 Million There has been an average annual shortfall of approximately $400,000 over the four-year period, and the decline in outside funding has led to a downward year-on-year trend in the funds available for pavement maintenance. To help mitigate this trend, staff will be recommending during the approaching budget review and discussion that rather than allocate $750,000 each to the Pavement Management and Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repair & ADA Ramps accounts in the FY 2011-12 CIP, the total of $1.5 Million for the two maintenance programs be apportioned $1.25 Million for Pavement Management and $250,000 for Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repair & ADA Ramps. Although the latter program may accumulate a backlog of requested work, immediate safety hazards will continue to be eliminated. This will result in a pavement funding trend as follows. Pavement Funding Trend Through 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) Total Pavement Funds Available 2007-2008 $2.38 Million 2008-2009 $2.17 Million 2009-2010 $2.05 Million 2010-2011 $1.55 Million 2011-2012 $1.25 Million Total $9.40 Million Approximate Five-Year Average $1.88 Million This represents an average annual shortfall of just over $500,000. 65 Development of Maintenance Projects and Street Locations Each year, pavement maintenance projects are developed and implemented to preserve or improve the condition of specific streets and minimize future maintenance costs to the greatest extent possible. Due to the increasing needs of our street network and the limited funding available, staff has developed a prioritization system to select the streets that receive maintenance treatments this year based on the following criteria: 1. Pavement Management Program recommendations 2. Engineering and maintenance staff recommendations. 3. Street conditions appropriate for specified treatment 4. Grant funding requirements 5. Streets with unique needs 6. Streets with shared maintenance responsibilities with other jurisdictions Scheduled Maintenance Projects for 2011 Public Works will be implementing four pavement maintenance projects for the 2011 pavement season. Exhibit C contains the list of street segments established for each project. It is noted that the lists could be slightly altered as unforeseen conditions arise or new information regarding other street related projects become available. Conclusions To most effectively address the current pavement needs with the given budget, staff is implementing a multi-pronged approach: · Use knowledge of maintenance personnel in recommending street network treatments · Temporarily shift the balance of maintenance funding for concrete repair and pavement maintenance toward pavement maintenance · Use StreetSaver® primarily as a budget assessment tool · Implement a comprehensive methodology, incorporating a significant degree of direct and visual validation of results. · Train and use in-house staff as much as possible. · Investigate alternate pavement treatments that will provide a stop gap effort to maintain streets in the interim until PCI values can stabilize. This report is for the Council’s information and no action is required. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Glenn Goepfert, Assistant Director - Public Works Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: EXHIBIT A – Deferred Maintenance Cost by Annual Funding Level EXHIBIT B – Pavement Projects 2001-2009 EXHIBIT C – Pavement Projects 2010 EXHIBIT D – Pavement Project Locations 2011-12 66 $0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 Deferred Maintenance CostDeferred Maintenance Cost by Annual Funding Level No Funds $750,000 $2.4Million $3.5Million $6.6Million 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 prior treatment Analysis Year Annual Funding Level $36.1 M $34.7 M $24.0M $19.9M $5.0M $7.72M 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 prior treatment Analysis Year Annual Funding Level $36.1 M $34.7 M $24.0M $19.9M $5.0M $7.72M Exhibit A67 STELLINGSTEVENS CREEK DE ANZAJUNIPER O SERRA HOMESTEAD TANTAUW EST VALLEY BLANEYBUBBMCCLELLAN MILLERWOLFELAWRENCEMARYXXXALVES JOHNSONVOSS PRO SPECTSTEVENS CANYONESTATESLOREE R E G N A R T PORTALTILSON HYDEJUDYBRETMANNPRUNERIDGEFOOTHILL CRISTO REYLORNE FINCHBYRNERODRIGUES BOLLINGER MERRITT BANDLEYTORRESTERNVAI WUNDERLICHKIRWINKIMORANGEC R EST O N COLUMBUS PHILSCENIC POPPYSTOKES VALLCO BARKBEARDON COLBYWEYBURNLA MAR ERINPHAR LAPRAE WRIGHTST ERL I NGLINNETPALM FARALLONEHERONBALBOA VISTALAZANEO CALVERTGIANNINICHIALA RAINBOW SA L E M GREENLEAFCASTINE WHEATONDEODARA LANCERALPIN E BONNYDENISONPRIMROSELARRYAINSWORTHMAXINEFE STIVAL WINDSORLARKRANDYBLUE HILL GLENVIEW SCO FIELD FARGO LINDA VISTAMARIANI 280 FWY RAMP WILKINSONVALLEY GREEN SHELLY KENT W O O D N O E L STAFFORDSAN JUAN HYANNISPORT DUMAS GALLIBLUE JAYALCALDE GASCOIGNEHARLANTIPTOE PRICE DE FOE PERIMETERALCAZARARBORETUM CRAIGRICHWOODLUCILLE A R A T A DUNBAR S E P T E MBERO A K V ALL E Y MELVINWESTLYNNSUISUN PENDLETON SANTA TERESACUPERTINO SUNRISE LIN D Y JOHNHILLSDALEHUBBARDUPLANDCARVERNEWSOMFLORA VISTALILAC TOMPKINSMINERJANICE ANCOCK VISTA KN OLL DE SOTOLOWELL FALLENLEAFLONDONDERRY PROUTYMORETTIHANFORD TULAPRESIDIOKIMBERLYP E NI NS U L A SAICHROSARIO MI LKYPORTOLA MARIALA HERRANBAH LBETTEBARNHART PHYLLIS CASTANO PACIFICA AMAPOLALA RODADRAKE LOCKWOODD E MP S T E R CORDOVABETLINASPEN MADERA FOREST SWALLOWPASADENATUGGLE PENDERGAST FORGE CANYON OAKANTONLONNALILYPLUM TREEMONTEBELLO CYNTHIACEDAR WATERFORD S U L L IV A N HILLCRESTLOMITA BE LV E D E R E ELMSFORDMIRA VISTAARLINGTONREDWOODGARDEN GATE TONITACARMENNOVEMBERPALO VISTAOAKTREEHANNA AVENIDA CORVETTEMINETTECLAYMEADOWOLIVE MILFORD EDWARD PINEVILLENORWICHS Y C A M O R E AVONDALEMENHARTCASTLETON ANN ARBORSC OTLAN D CLARENDON MEDINA STENDHALFELTONMERRIMANPARLETTBRENTOAKVILLEST MARY'S STARL INGBEECHWOOD WALLACE SEVEN SPRI NGSJAMESTOWNSOMERSET BELKNAPBARRANCA ANNNORTHWOOD HOWARDSILVERADO ALDERBROOKYORKSHIREROSE BLOSSOMCHERYL SHARON RIVERSIDE LAURETTA HEATHERWOODBAXTERADRIANA M A U R E E N MELODY CORONADOWIINSTON BIXBY A M U L E T MEIGGS VINEYARD WESTACRESMARTINBAYWOODSHADOWHILL RUMFORD PARKWOOD NORANDASHASTA L E E D SEMPIRE GILLICK LONGDOWN BEEKMAN BLUE HILLS W OODSAMHERSTSAMEDRA VICKSBURGANSON HUNTERSTONDAVISONKINTYRENORMANDY BENTOAKPAYETTE ELM FIR TULIPANASTERLEBANONCRAFTCHRISTENSEN ALMADEN STANFORD DOLORES MONTCLAIREL CERRITOG LEN HUDSONHUNTINGTONSEQUOIA GRANAD A R IC A R D O HAZELBROOK HERMOSA HARTMAN MORENGOFRANCOGARDEN A VIA VICO CLIFDEN ORIO NCASS DANBURYNEWCASTLE B E A U C H A M P S L A S A L L E SANTA CL ARALAURENTIANDERBYSHIRERAM PARTROBINDELLHENEY CREEKCANARYSHADYGROVE DARTMOORSANTA PAULA CALGARYBELLEVILLEPUMPKIN DRYDENKR Z I C H PEPPER TREE ST SOSEPH RUPPELLPARISHFERNGROVEPEACH BLO SSO M DEVON WOODRIDGE S E R R A RESULTSNILEFRIARSMETEOR IMPERIALCHACEBURNETT LAS ONDAS CREEKLINEHOLLENBECKBUCKTHORNEMERCEDESINFINITE LOOP GREENWOOD M I M O S A FIRWOODGLENCOESELKIRK LANSDALEC RIC K E T HILL SO LA DEEP CLIFFMANZANITA OLMOWHITNEYBROOKGROVEPARNELL HALL DE LA FARGE STAUFFER ORANGE BLOSSOM RALYA PEAR TREE QUAILKESTERRIDGEVIEWPRUNE TREEACADIA WESTERNRUCKER S TO N Y D A LE LINDSAYWOODBURY KAMSACKCALI CARLYSLEBANFF APPLE TREE SHETLAND PALOS VERDESMONROVIA CODYHALEAUBURN ELENDA MYERJACQUELINEWILD FLOW ER GREENOAKPARADISELINDENBROOK WOODHILL LA GRANDE HOLLANDERRY SHATTUCK TWIG KINGSBURY RUNOPRADO VISTAOLIVEWO OD MASONMARTINWOODENGLISH OAKVIA MADEROSC H A N T EL ANNE ATHERWOOD TERRACE C E ME T E R Y R OA DCAMINO VISTAC EL E S TE RANDOLPH LOCKSUNART DAWSONST JAMES DEXTER OROGRANDE SQUIREWOOD LEONARDROYAL OAK PEACOCKGRANT VIA LOMBARDIV IA H U E R T A WOODLARK LIVERPOOL D E A NAMELIA KENNEWICKBLAZINGWOODVIA ESPLENDOR CANDLELIGHTBLACK OAK HUNTER MARSHALL OAKVIEW BROOKWELLC AL A B A ZA S MIR A M O N T E KO DIAK SAN JACINTOESQUIRERAMONAPARK VILLA DOROTHY ANNE SQUIREHILL CANYO N VIEW MACKENZIE WESTMOOR WALNUT BIGOAKNARCISOCEDAR TREE K R IN G VILLA DE ANZASILVER OAK B ROOK V A L E VIA CA MIN O WEST HI LLCAROL LEEFORT BAKERNORTHWEST CEDARBROOK GLENTREE W ALLINEL PRADOFLORENCEDUCKETTSTEEPLECHASE EDSEL TWILIGHT TR E S SLE R CYPRESSNOONAN R I T A N N A OAKDELL MURIEL E D M IN T O NBIANCHILAMBETH NORTHWIND MANITACOTTONWOODMADRIDORLINEA L I CI A S I ERRA SPRI NGCIVIC PARK LOCH LOMONDMARIA ROSANORTHPOINTCLEO CALLE DE BARCELONA CHARSANPALOMA ELDERWOODUNITEDCORTE MADERA VENTANA VARIAN SENATECROWNRIDGE CREEK ORCHARDANTHONY COZETTE SUTTON PARK OAKNOLLSWEET OAKPARK CIRCLEMELISSATULITASEGOVIA VILLA MARIA QUEENS OAK RONALDPINOLECLUB HOUSEMURANO DANIEL PLUM BLOSSOM VIA PAVISO NIGHTINGALEC O R YWHITE FIRGARDENSIDE NORTHHURSTBEAVENSHADY OAK PRINGEATONLUCKY OAKACACIA PARKVIEW MOSSY OAKLA JOLLAC ATA L A N O CATALINABRI DGE P A RKVIA V E N T U R A SAKURAMCLAREN CARRIAGE ORANGEWOOD MA P LE T R E E SE E B E R CARTWRIGHTCHETAMONCLOVERLY NIGHTHAWKLANGPORT RI VI ERADREAMOUNT CRESTBRENDARANDYXXX CYNTHIA KIMBERLY RAINBOWMERRIMAN XXX POPPY XXX XXX REGNARTXXX280 FWY RAMP XXX RAINBOW WOLFEARLINGTONST E V E N S C R E E K XXXBARNHART RIVERSIDE PARK VILLA AVONDALEXXX BUBBIMPERIALX X X XXX XX XGLENCOEDEODARAOAK VALLEYH O W A R D B O L L I N G E R XXX XXXKINTYREMARYJOHN XXXKIMPACIFICA LOWELL FOOTHILLBOLLINGER FORGE VISTALINDA VISTA XXXPAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECTS2001 - 2009 ¯Cape Seal Overlay Slurry Seal Pavement Restoration EXHIBIT B 68 STELLINGSTEVENS CREEK JUNIPER O SERRA DE ANZAHOMESTEAD TANTAUW EST VALLEY BLANEYBUBBFOOTHILLMCCLELLAN WOLFEMILLERLAWRENCEMARYR E G N A R T ALVES JOHNSONVOSS ESTATESPRO SPECTSTEVENS CANYONLOREEPORTAL TILSON HYDEJUDYBRETMANNPRUNERIDGE LORNE FINCHBYRNERODRIGUES BOLLINGER MERRITT BANDLEYTORRESTERNVAI WUNDERLICHKIRWIN XXX KIMORANGEC R EST O N COLUMBUS PHILSCENIC POPPYWRIGHTSTOKES VALLCO BARKBEARDON COLBYWEYBURNLA MAR ERINPHAR LAPRAECRISTO REYST ERL I NGLINNETDEO DARA PALM FARALLONEHERONBALBOA VISTALAZANEO CALVERTGIANNINICHIALA RAINBOW SA L E M GREENLEAFCASTINE WHEATON LANCERALPIN E BONNYDENISONPRIMROSELARRYAINSWORTHMAXINEFE STIVAL WINDSORLARKRANDYBLUE HILL GLENVIEW SCO FIELD FARGO LINDA VISTAMARIANI 280 FWY RAMP WILKINSONVALLEY GREEN SHELLY KENT W O O D N O E L STAFFORDSAN JUAN HYANNISPORT DUMAS GALLIBLUE JAYALCALDE GASCOIGNEHARLANTIPTOE PRICE DE FOE PERIMETERALCAZAR CRAIGRICHWOODLUCILLE A R A T A D U N BA R S E P T E MBERMELVINWESTLYNNSUISUN PENDLETON SANTA TERESACUPERTINO SUNRISE LIN D Y JOHNHILLSDALEHUBBARDUPLANDCARVERNEWSOMFLORA VISTAARBORETUMLILAC TOMPKINSMINERJANICE ANCOCK VISTA KN OLL DE SOTOLOWELL FALLENLEAFLONDONDERRY PROUTYMORETTIHANFORD TULAPRESIDIOKIMBERLYP E NI NS U L A MARTINSAICHROSARIO MI LKYW OODSPORTOLA LA HERRANBAH LBETTEBARNHART PHYLLIS CASTANO PACIFICA AMAPOLA DRAKE D E MP S T E R CORDOVABETLINASPEN MADERA SAMEDRAFOREST SWALLOWWINDIMER PASADENATUGGLE PENDERGAST FORGE CANYON OAKANTONLONNALILYPLUM TREECYNTHIACEDAR WATERFORD S U L L IV A NBERNARDO HILLCRESTLOMITA BE LV E D E R E ELMSFORDMIRA VISTAARLINGTONREDWOODGARDEN GATE TONITACARMENNOVEMBERPALO VISTAOAKTREEHANNA AVENIDA CORVETTEMINETTECLAYMEADOWOLIVE MILFORD EDWARD PINEVILLENORWICHAVONDALEMENHARTCASTLETON ANN ARBORSC OTLAN D CLARENDON MEDINA STENDHALFELTONMERRIMANPARLETTBRENTOAKVILLEST MARY'S STARL INGBEECHWOOD WALLACE SEVEN SPRI NGSJAMESTOWNSOMERSET BELKNAPBARRANCA ANNNORTHWOOD ALLEYHOWARDSILVERADO ALDERBROOKYORKSHIREROSE BLOSSOMCHERYL SHARON RIVERSIDE LA CONNERSIE RRA VENTURALAURETTA HEATHERWOODBAXTERADRIANALOCKWOOD LA RODAHIGHLANDS M A U R E E N MELODY CORONADOWIINSTON BIXBY A M U L E T MEIGGS V IN E Y A R D WESTACRESBAYWOODSHADOWHILL RUMFORD PARKWOOD NORANDASHASTA L E E D SEMPIRE GILLICK LONGDOWN BEEKMANHOLLENBECK AMHERST VICKSBURGANSON HUNTERSTONDAVISONKINTYRENORMANDY BENTOAKPAYETTE ELM FIR TULIPANASTERLEBANONCRAFTCHRISTENSEN ALMADEN MARIASTANFORD DOLORES MONTCLAIREL CERRITOG LEN HUDSONBELLEVILLEHUNTINGTONSEQUOIA GRANAD A R IC A R D O HAZELBROOK HERMOSA HARTMAN MORENGOFRANCOGARDEN A VIA VICO CLIFDEN ORIO NCASS DANBURYNEWCASTLESANTA CL ARALAURENTIANDERBYSHIRERAM PARTROBINDELLHENEY CREEKCANARYSHADYGROVE DARTMOORSANTA PAULASTONEHEAVEN CALGARYPUMPKIN DRYDENKR Z I C H PEPPER TREE RUPPELLPARISHFERNGROVEPEACH BLO SSO M DEVON WOODRIDGE S E R R A RESULTSNILEFRIARSMETEOR IMPERIALCHACEPINECREST LAS ONDAS CREEKLINEBUCKTHORNEMERCEDESINFINITE LOOP GREENWOOD M I M O S A FIRWOODGLENCOESELKIRK LANSDALEC RIC K E T HILL SO LA MEADOWLARKDEEP CLIFFMANZANITA OLMOWHITNEYBROOKGROVEPARNELL HALL DE LA FARGE STAUFFER ORANGE BLOSSOM RALYA PEAR TREE QUAILKESTERRIDGEVIEWPRUNE TREEACADIA WESTERNHAMMONDRUCKER S TO N Y D A LE LINDSAYKAMSACKWOODBURY CALI CARLYSLEBANFF APPLE TREE SHETLAND MONROVIA CODYHALEAUBURN ELENDA MYERJACQUELINEWILD FLOW ER GREENOAKPARADISELINDENBROOK WOODHILL LA GRANDE HOLLANDERRY SHATTUCK TWIGNEW BRUNSWICKKINGSBURY RUNOPRADO VISTAOLIVEWO OD MASONMARTINWOODENGLISH OAKVIA MADEROSC H A N T EL ANNE ATHERWOOD TERRACE C E ME T E R Y R OA DCAMINO VISTACANYON VISTAC EL E S TE RANDOLPH LOCKSUNART VI A ESPLENDORDAWSONST JAMES DEXTER OROGRANDE SQUIREWOOD LEONARDROYAL OAK PEACOCKGRANT VIA LOMBARDIWOODLARK LIVERPOOL D E A NAMELIA KENNEWICKBLAZINGWOODCANDLELIGHTHUNTER MARSHALL OAKVIEW BROOKWELLC AL A B A ZA S KO DIAK SAN JACINTOESQUIRERAMONAPARK VILLA DOROTHY ANNE SQUIREHILL CANYO N VIEW MACKENZIE WESTMOOR CARO LINE WALNUT BIGOAKNARCISOCEDAR TREE K R IN G VILLA DE ANZASILVER OAK B ROOK V A L E VIA CA MIN O WEST HI LLCAROL LEEWISTARIA FORT BAKERNORTHWEST CEDARBROOK GLENTREE W ALLINEL PRADOFLORENCEDUCKETTSTEEPLECHASE EDSEL TWILIGHT TR E S SLE R CYPRESSNOONAN OAKDELL MURIEL E D M IN T O NBIANCHILAMBETH NORTHWIND MANITACOTTONWOODMADRIDORLINEA L I CI A S I ERRA SPRI NGCIVIC PARK LOCH LOMONDMARIA ROSANORTHPOINTCLEO CALLE DE BARCELONA CHARSANPALOMA ELDERWOODUNITEDCORTE MADERA VENTANA VARIAN SENATECROWNROLLINGDELL RIDGE CREEK ORCHARDANTHONY COZETTE SUTTON PARK OAKNOLLSWEET OAKLAMONTPARK CIRCLETULITASEGOVIA VILLA MARIA QUEENS OAK RONALDPINOLECLUB HOUSEMURANO DANIEL PLUM BLOSSOM VIA PAVISO NIGHTINGALEC O R YWHITE FIRGARDENSIDE NORTHHURSTBEAVENSHADY OAK PRINGCALIFORNIA OAKEATONLUCKY OAKACACIA PARKVIEW MOSSY OAKLA JOLLAC ATA L A N O CATALINABRI DGE P A RKSAKURAMCLAREN CARRIAGE ORANGEWOOD MA P LE T R E E SE E B E R CARTWRIGHTCHETAMONCLOVERLY LANGPORT RI VI ERADREAMOUNT CRESTBRENDASTOCKLMEIR BENETTI OAK MEADOW PACIFICA RAINBOWARLINGTONXXXKIM CYNTHIA KIMBERLY XXX LINDA VISTA REGNARTXX XMARY 280 FWY RAMP JOHNVISTA H O W A R D B O L L I N G E R AVONDALEPOPPY ST E V E N S C R E E K BONNYPARK VILLAMERRIMAN XXXREGNARTIMPERIALXXXXXXRAINBOW XXXBUBBXXX X X X BOLLINGERLA RODAWOLFEXXX XXXXXXBARNHARTKINTYREXXX XXX FORGEDEODARARANDYRIVERSIDEXXX EXHIBIT C ¯Cape Seal Overlay Slurry Seal PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECTS 2010 69 Pavement Project Locations 2011-12 EXHIBIT D 1/2 Proj ID Project Type of Work Location/Zone Approximate Cost Fund Source Bid Date A Pavement Restoration Digout & reconstruct discrete areas of failing pavement Various City-wide 200,000$ GF July-11 B 2011 Pavement Mgmt Grind and overlay, slurry seal, cape seal of existing pavements Citywide 1,050,000$ GF July-11 Streets Segment Carriage All Heatherwood Westlynn to Tuscany Kim Bollinger to McClellan Santa Teresa Hyannisport to Terrace Brookgrove Lane Shadygrove to Willowgrove Ferngrove Drive Shadygrove to Willowgrove Shadygrove Court All Stendhal Lane Disney to Phil Shadygrove Drive Hyde to Stendahl Betlin Avenue John to Clifford W. Estates Drive All New Haven Court All Old Town Court All Liberty Court All Providence Court All Oak Meadow Court All Greenleaf West of Stelling Greenleaf WO Stelling to end Tulita All Rose Blossom McClellan to Huntridge Blazingwood Alderbrook to Myrtlewood Alcalde Avenida to Alicia Alcalde Alicia to Foothill De Anza Blvd 280 Fwy west De Anza Blvd 280 Fwy east Presidio Bubb to Ft Baker Phil Lane Miller to Tantau Brittany Las Ondas to end Alderbrook Wy Alderbrook to end Blaney Avenue Homestead to Northforde Blaney Avenue Northforde to Cedartree Blaney Avenue Cedartree to Forest Blaney Avenue Forest to SCB De Anza Blvd 280 Fwy to Mariani De Anza Blvd Mariani to280 Fwy Bollinger Road Miller to Farallone Vista Drive Forest to Merritt Finch Avenue Phil to Calle de Barcelona Milford Drive Anson to Castine Brewer Avenue Dexter to Milford Dexter Drive Brewer to Chisholm Chisholm Avenue Dexter to Milford Willowbrook All John Street Blaney to Farallone Farallone Avenue John to Las Ondas Price Avenue Blaney to Portal Bixby Drive Portal to Cold Harbor E. Estates Drive All DeFoe Drive All Fallenleaf Colony Hills to Westlyn Colony Hills Heatherwood to Tiptoe Heatherwood Colony Hills to Westlyn Yorkshire Sunderland to Folkestone Belknap Yorkshire to Elmsford Elmsford All Hyannisport Rae to Bubb Rosario Ave Ronald to Bubb Maria Rosa Columbus to Rosario Fitzgerald Dempster to Alhambra Stokes Somerset Park to Fitzgerald Rodrigues SCB to Torre Acalande Felipe to Stevens Cyn Adriana All Carnoustie Court All Deep Cliffe All Imperial Olive to end Mann All Palm All Pasadena Olive to Granada Prado Vista All Stevens Canyon City limits to park entrance Stokes All Vista Knoll All Overlay Cape Seal TMO 70 Pavement Project Locations 2011-12 EXHIBIT D 2/2 Cozette Tantau to end Richwood Vicksburg to Miller Tilson Finch to Tantau Arata Loree to Calvert Barnhart Culbertson to Moretti Barnhart Ct Barnhart to end Bret Loree to SCB Calvert Menhart to CL Carver Newsom to Tuggle Cynthia Gascoigne to Sterling Gascoigne Newsom to Wunderlich Gascoigne Wunderlich to Barnhart Johnson Bollinger and Newsom Loree Calvert to Johnson Loree Stern to Moretti Meiggs Tantau to Morengo Minette Pl Minette to end Minette Newsom to Wunderlich Moretti Loree to Barnhart Newsom Carver to Johnson Newsom Johnson to Wunderlich Pendergast Culbertson to Wunderlich Pring Sterling to end Ralya Sterling to end Starrett Sterling to end Sterling Runo to N end Stern Loree to SCB Tilson Calvert to Johnson Tuggle Wunderlich to end Bollinger Road DeFoe to end & De Anza to Westlynn McClellan Road Orange to Byrne McClellan Road Byrne to Linda Vista Stelling Road Gardengate to Greenleaf Stelling Road Prospect to Waterford Tantau Avenue SCB to Cozette Miller Avenue Calle de Barcelona to Bollinger Blaney Avenue Bollinger to Rodrigues Bubb Road McClellan to SCB Brewer Spot Chisholm Spot Linda Vista Spot DeFoe Spot Brittany Spot Farallone Spot Johnson Spot Stokes Spot Ainsworth Spot Vista Knoll Spot Blaney Avenue Spot Blaney Avenue Spot Blaney Avenue Spot Blaney Avenue Spot Blaney Avenue Spot Bollinger Road Spot Bollinger Road Spot Bollinger Road Spot De Anza Blvd Spot De Anza Blvd Spot De Anza Blvd Spot De Anza Blvd Spot De Anza Blvd Spot Miller Avenue Spot Miller Avenue Spot Miller Avenue Spot Stelling Road Spot Stevens Creek Blvd Spot Stevens Creek Blvd Spot Wolfe Road Spot Wolfe Road Spot Tamarind Court All Tulita Court All Finch Avenue SCB to Calle de Barcelona Vicksburg Drive E. Estates to Miller Richwood Drive Vicksburg to E. Estates Rainbow Drive Stelling to Bubb Note: Projects in 2011 will proceed as far down this list as available funds permit. Digout Slurry 71