Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Planning Commission Agenda Packet (full)
Table of Contents Agenda..... ..............................2 1. draft minutes 5 -10 -2011 draft minutes 5 -10 -2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2-draft minutes 5 -24 -2011 draft minutes 5 -24 -2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3. Request to construct four, two -story, single family residences by Habitat for Humanity Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1. Tentative Map Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2. Use Permit Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3. ASA Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 4. Parking Exception Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 5. Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 4.Use permit to allow 50% office uses. Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 1. Draft Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2. Use Permit 5 -U -85 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3. Use Permit 48 -U -85 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 4.Current Parking Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5. Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 5. Use Permit and Tree Removal for a new day care facility Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 1. Use Permit Draft Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 2. Tree Removal Draft Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 3. Business Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 4. Arborist Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 5. Noise Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 6. Play Area Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 7.Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 6. Subdivision of a 0.28 acre parcel and construction of 2 new single family residences. Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 1. Draft Resolution DP- 2011 -01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 2. Draft Resolution ASA- 2011 -08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 3. Draft Resolution TM- 2011 -02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 4. Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 7 Director's Report Director's Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 Press Release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 1 AGENDA C U P S RT I N O CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Community Hall Tuesday, June 14, 2011 ORDER OF BUSINESS SALUTE TO THE FLAG: 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Subject draft minutes 5 -10 -2011 Recommended Action approve draft minutes Page 5 2. Subject draft minutes 5 -24 -2011 Recommended Action approve draft minutes Page 10 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARING 3. Subject Request to construct four, two- story, single family residences by Habitat for Humanity Recommended Action Approve or deny U- 2011- 05,ASA- 2011- 06,EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01 Description Application No: U- 2011 -05, ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01 Applicant: Chris Weaver (Habitat for Humanity) Location: Cleo Avenue Use Permit for four, two -story single family dwellings on 0.30 acres; Architectural and Site approval for four, two -story single family dwellings; E Tuesday, June 14, 2011 Page -2 Parking Exception to allow a parking ration of 2 stalls per dwelling, in lieu of the required 2.8 stalls garage and open) per dwelling, for a small lot family residential project; Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 0.30 acres into four lots and a common area lot for a single family residential development Postponed from the May 24, 2011 Planning Commission meeting Tentative City Council meeting date: July 5, 2011 Page 14 4. Subject Application to allow 50% office uses where 25% is allowed Recommended Action Approve or deny U- 2011 -06 Description Application No.: U- 2011 -06 Applicant: Kenneth Frangadakis (De Anza Professional Center) Location: 10601 S De Anza Blvd Use Permit to allow 50% office uses where 25% is allowed at an existing commercial center located in a P(CG) zone. Planning Commission decision final unless appealed Page 46 5. Subject Use Permit for a new day care facility Recommended Action Approve or deny U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011 -09 Description Application: U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011 -09 Applicant: Tony Chen (Yunjian Zou /O -Mei Academy) Location: 10070 Imperial Avenue Use Permit to allow a new daycare facility at an existing office building; Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of three trees in conjunction with parking lot and landscaping improvements at a new daycare facility Planning Commission decision final unless appealed Page 63 6. Subject Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of 2 new single family residences Recommended Action Approve of deny DP- 2011 -01, ASA- 2011 -08, TM- 2011 -02 Description Application: DP- 2011 -01, ASA- 2011 -08, TM- 2011 -02 Applicant: Terry Brown (Robert Adzich) Location: 10216 & 10232 Orange Ave Development Permit to allow the construction of two new, 2,697 square foot, two -story single family residences; Architectural and Site approval for two new, 2,697 square foot, two -story single family residences; Tentative Map to subdivide a 0.29 acre parcel into two parcels of 6,000 square feet each 3 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 Page -3 Planning Commission decision final unless appealed Page 101 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Environmental Review Committee Housing Commission Mayor's Monthly Meeting with Commissioners Economic Development Committee Meeting REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7. Subject Director's Report Recommended Action Receive report Page 136 ADJOURNMENT Ifyou challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please note that Planning Commission policy is to allow an applicant and groups to speak for 10 minutes and individuals to speak for 3 minutes. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk's office at 408 -777 -3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Planning Department after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours. For questions on any items in the agenda, or for documents related to any of the items on the agenda, contact the Planning Department at (408) 777 -3308 or planning@cupertino.org 0 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES 6:45 P.M. May 10, 2011 TUESDAY CUPERTINO COMMUNITY HALL The regular Planning Commission meeting of May 10, 2011 was called to order at 6:45 p.m. in the Cupertino Community Hall, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Ca., by Vice Chair Marty Miller. SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Staff present: Vice Chairperson: Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Chairperson: City Planner: Marty Miller Paul Brophy Clinton Brownley Don Sun Winne Lee Gary Chao Vice Chair Miller presided as Acting Chair in Chair Winnie Lee's absence. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the April 26, 2011 Planning Commission meeting: Motion: Motion by Com. Brophy, second by Co 4 -0 -0 (Com. Lee absent) to approve minutes as presented. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None Com Sun, and unanimously carried the April 26, 2011 Planning Commission POSTPONEMENTS /REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR: 2. U- 2011 -05, ASA- 2011 -06, Use Permit for four, two -story single family dwellings EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01 on 030 acres; Architectural and Site approval for four, Chris Weaver for Habitat two -story single family dwellings; Parking Exception to For Humanity allow a parking ratio of 2 stalls per dwelling, in lieu of the Location: Cleo Avenue required 2.8 stalls (garage and open) per dwelling for a Small lot family residential project; Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 030 acres into four lots and a common area lot for a single family residential development Postponement requested to June 14, 2011 Planning Commission meeting; Tentative City Council meeting date: July 19, 2011 Motion: Motion by Com. Brownley, second by Cand carried 4 -0 -0, Com. Lee absent, to postpone Application U- 2011 -05, ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, and TM- 2011 -01 to the June 14, 2011 Planning Commission meeting. 5 Cupertino Planning Commission May 10, 2011 1. R- 2011 -03 Appeal of an approval of a Residential Design Review for Daryl Harris (Sengupta a new, 3,683 sq. ft. two -story single family residence. & Herrera residence) Postponement requested to the June 28, 2011 meeting. 21150 Grenola Drive Planning Commission decision final unless appealed. Applicant is requesting that the item not be postponed. Gary Chao, City Planner: • Said that the appellant was present to address the commission on the item. Motion: Motion by Com. Brownley, second by Com. Brophy, and carried 4 -0 -0, Com. Lee absent, to deny the request for postponement of Application R- 2011 -03 and to agendize it for discussion. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR None PUBLIC HEARING 1. R- 2011 -03 Daryl Harris (Sengupta & Herrera residence) 21150 Grenola Drive None Appeal of an approval of a Residential Design Review for a new, 3,683 sq. ft. two -story single family residence. Postponement requested to the June 28, 2011 meeting. Planning Commission decision final unless appealed. Gary Chao, City Planner, presented the staff report: • Reviewed the application for the consideration of the appeal of the Community Development Director's March 14, 2011 approval of a Residential Design Review for a new 3,683 sq. ft. two -story single family residence located on Grenola Drive. The proposed home is at 38% FAR, where 45% is allowed, and the project meets all aspects of the R1 ordinance. • He reviewed the three main reasons for the appeal of the approval by Homa and Mehrdad Mcjgam, including their concern that there was no 3D image on the image board; their concern that the landscaping plan was not sufficient and did not appropriately address privacy planting especially along the west elevation, and their concern about the proposed composition roof shingles and shingle siding not being consistent with the neighborhood (stucco and tile roofing materials were preferred). Staff responses to appellant's objections /statements: • The required color perspective was provided by the applicant and was posted on the noticing board; there are no provisions in the RI ordinance requiring the 3D drawing. In terms of privacy protection, along both sides of the side elevation, all windows shown on plans are denoted to have a sill height of at least 5 feet or taller; so consistent with the R1 ordinance, any second story window that has a sill height of 5 feet or taller does not need to provide privacy protection; therefore the privacy protection requirements have been adequately addressed. • Regarding the style and proposed material of the building, staff disagrees with the appellant in that they feel that the proposed design is good and will be complementary to the neighborhood. At times, staff talks about how stucco and tile roofing may be rather harsh and it is difficult to mask some of the mass, staff actually prefers the shingle roof and the natural materials as those are more compatible with the pre- existing ranch style neighborhood. • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Director's decision by approving the application in accordance with the model resolution. 0 Cupertino Planning Commission 3 May 10, 2011 Homa Mojgani, Appellant: • Said they requested a postponement on the appeal but were not granted one. She said they did not receive a notice regarding the new construction and they resided only two homes away; and only found out after story poles were erected. • Relative to the roofing materials, she disagreed with staffs response that the composition roof shingles and shingle siding were consistent with the surrounding neighborhood since most of the neighborhoods were being renovated with tile roofs and stucco finishes. She emphasized that composition roof shingles were no longer being used and they presented a safety factor primarily with the risk of fires. • She discussed the various inconsistencies in rules that they encountered over the years while building their home; and denial of their proposed west side balcony because of residents' comments, and commented that it cost them an additional $140,000 in delays and changes. She asked that the Commission review their appeal and make the right decision for the sake of the neighborhood and the city of Cupertino. Gary Chao responded to comments from appellant: • Relative to the continuance request, he clarified that staff did not inform the appellant that her continuance would have been denied. She was informed to be present in the event the Commission wanted to discuss the application. • In terms of notification of process, the project was notified per the city ordinance, neighbors within 300 feet of the property were notified (list of addresses available). Specific to the Mojgam case, their property address listed on the County Assessor's database was a Palm Avenue address and the notice was sent to the Palm Avenue address. Staff does not have the discretion to notify any other way other than whatever the owner chooses to be notified under this address under the county's database; consequently this notice went to their Palm Avenue address which they own. • With respect to the color perspective, said he could show what was presented on the notice board; perhaps there was a misunderstanding in terms of semantics of what is required. A color rendering perspective does carry some form of dimension; it is not a flat color rendering. IHe said that was what was presented, it can be called 31), although it is not quite 31). Clarified that a full 31) rendering is not required; the intent is to show some depth to it and some shadow lines so that the neighbors can look at it and get a sense of what is proposed. He said he felt the image shown satisfies that intent and does a good job in illustrating that. • Relative to consistency with other homes in the neighborhood, he said the RI ordinance does not require all homes to look exactly alike; the intent is to provide a variety of interesting architecture as long as the mass and scale are generally within context. There is the responsibility to make sure that new homes also respect older homes in the neighborhood and are not meant to just match the newer homes in the area. • There are no fire safety issues with shingle roofs; there are fire ratings that would have to be approved by the state and that meet building and fire code. He said he was certain it was the case with the roofing material proposed by the applicant. • Said he did not feel it was appropriate to discuss the Mojgam's previous application along with the present application being discussed. The Mojgam's application was approved and the home is being built; there were some controversies and concerns from the adjacent neighbors at the time about their proposed balcony, but it is immaterial in terms of what is presented before the Commission for consideration. Daryl Harris, Architect: • Said everything was explained satisfactorily and the history and letter form of staff responses to the appeal were clear. He said he supported denial of the appeal, and felt the basis of the appeal was not about the house, but the unfortunate process that the Mojganis went through 7 Cupertino Planning Commission when building their home. May 10, 2011 Vice Chair Miller opened the public hearing. There was no one present to speak, the hearing was closed. Com. Brownley: • Said he felt it was important to review all the points that were brought up and he appreciated staffs response to the 3D image being in compliance with the RI ordinance. The landscaping plan as proposed meets the requirements of the ordinance; the roof and shingles being a certain style fits within the ordinance and is appropriate. Relative to noticing, staff followed the appropriate noticing process and met all requirements for noticing people within the area. • With all points met, he said he supported moving forward with the project. Com. Sun: • Said he concurred with most of the comments of the Commissioners, but was concerned about Mrs. Mojgam's comments about inconsistencies with rules applied to all Cupertino homeowners /residents; and to ensure that all rules are consistent with all applications. Com. Brophy: • Agreed with Coms. Brownley and Sun, and supported the appeal denial. Vice Chair Miller: • Agreed with Commissioners and supported denial of the appeal. Motion: Motion by Com. Brophy, second by Com. Brownley, and unanimously carried 4 -0 -0, Com. Lee absent, to deny the appeal. Planning Commission decision final unless appealed to the City Council within 14 calendar days. OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS None Cupertino Planning Commission 5 May 10, 2011 REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Environmental Review Committee No meeting. Housing Commission Meeting scheduled for May 11, 2011. Mayor's Monthly Meeting With Commissioners Meeting postponed. Economic Development Committee Meeting Meeting scheduled for next week. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Gary Chao announced that the Planning Commission would be utilizing Agenda Manager for the Planning Commission packets; with the goal to going paperless for agenda packets. City Council has been testing Agenda Manager. Provided an update on the Green Building Ordinance. Said the City Council tabled their decision and gave a one year grace period for staff to post the draft to receive more community input. Staff has not been directed to further change what was presented to the City Council. Unless Council decides in May 2012 that they wish to send it back to the Planning Commission for further review, it will not come back to the Commission but will go directly to City Council. Staff will report back to them to see if there is any additional input and they will have to decide at that time what to do with it. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned to the next regular Planning Commission meeting scheduled for May 24, 2011, at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: Elizabeth Ellis, Recording Secretary 9 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES 6:45 P.M. May 24, 2011 TUESDAY CUPERTINO COMMUNITY HALL The regular Planning Commission meeting of May 24, 2011 was called to order at 6:45 p.m. in the Cupertino Community Hall, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Ca., by Chairperson Winnie Lee. SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL Commissioners present: Chairperson: Vice Chairperson Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Winnie Lee Marty Miller Paul Brophy Clinton Brownley Don Sun Staff present: City Planner: Community Development Director: Associate Planner: APPROVAL OF MINUTES None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None Gary Chao Aarti Shrivastava Pin Ghosh POSTPONEMENTS /REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR None PUBLIC HEARING 1. MCA - 2011 -03 (EA- 2011 -05) Workshop to provide input regarding changes and updates to City of Cupertino the City of Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 19.28, R -1 Citywide Location I Zones to improve readability and consistency and to evaluate the requirements for R1 -20 Zones, the 2 -story design review process, public noticing and story poles. Chair Lee explained that a focus group on R1 was convened earlier. 2. CP- 2011 -02 (EA- 2011 -07) Review of the Five Year Capital Improvements Program City of Cupertino (FY 20112 to 2015 -14) for conformity to the City of Citywide Location Cupertino's General Plan. Planning Commission decision final unless appealed. Colin Jung, Senior Planner, presented the staff report: • Explained that the review was an annual task of the Planning Commission; a requirement by law that before the City can adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the CIP needs to be reviewed by the Planning Commission to determine whether or not it conforms to the City's 10 Cupertino Planning Commission 2 May 24, 2011 General Plan. It is a five year program, with a review of the first year's projects for the purposes of environmental review; the applicant is the City of Cupertino, the property owner is the City of Cupertino, but the projects are citywide. Due to the state of the economy, the number of projects is about one -third of last year's. • The category of projects including the Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Stocklmeir Orchard Irrigation, Blackberry Farm Golf Course Irrigation; the Sports Center Pool Demolition, Sports Court Installation and the Quinlan Interior analysis and upgrades enhance existing parks inventory; they don't add any new lands to Cupertino parks, but part of the goals of the General Plan are to have a well maintained and quality parks and recreation inventory and those projects seek to do so. • Another category of projects in CIP list include the pavement management, curb gutter sidewalk repairs, ADA ramps, traffic signal battery backup system, which are projects that would improve the safety and functioning of the city's primary circulation system. • There are also transportation projects that manage neighborhood traffic, decrease the reliance on private vehicles and promote pedestrian activities and those two projects are primarily Stevens Creek Corridor project where there the main feature is a multi purpose, multi use trail and also the sidewalk repairs and the ADA ramps. • The final project on the CIP list is the money set aside for minor storm drainage improvements, which has policies and General Plan text that discuss the importance of protecting the city from flood risk. • Staff recommends a negative declaration on the project and adoption of a resolution that the CIP is consistent with the General Plan. Chair Lee opened the public hearing. Jennifer Griffin, Rancho Rinconada resident: • Said she attended the budget review meetings and was pleased to learn that the city is interested in the purchase of the Lawrence /Mitty property along the eastern edge of Rancho Rinconada and Lawrence Expressway and the funding for that in the future. She said the Rancho Rinconada area has very few parklands and would benefit from having more parks available. It is very important that the city keep the purchase of the property on the agenda for the future; it is a win/win for everyone if the land is purchased in the future, and Rancho Rinconada is willing to wait. Chair Lee closed the public hearing. Motion: Motion by Vice Chair Miller, second by Com. Brophy, and unanimously carried 5 -0 -0, to approve Application CP- 2011 -02 (EA- 2011 -07) per the model resolution. 3. ASA- 201 -04, U- 2011 -03 Architectural and Site approval for fagade, landscaping, parking Western Athletic Club/ lot and sidewalk enhancements, including a new trash enclosure Sears Roebuck Company to service an on -site cafe, inside a new health club facility; Use 10101 No. Wolfe Rd. Permit to allow the new health club to open at 5:30 a.m. on weekdays and 6:30 a.m. on weekends. Planning Commission decision final unless appealed. Pin Ghosh, Associate Planner, presented the staff report: • Reviewed the application for architectural and site approval for facade, landscaping, parking lot and sidewalk enhancements, and a new trash enclosure to service an on -site cafe inside the Bay Club Cupertino in the Vallco Shopping Mall (inside the Sears building) as outlined in the staff report. The health club is requesting to open at 5:30 a.m. on weekdays and 6:30 a.m. on 11 Cupertino Planning Commission May 24, 2011 weekends; currently the city's ordinance is for operating hours between 7 a.m. and 11 a.m. but allowances with modifications with a conditional use permit. A focus traffic analysis was done to determine if the health club would add additional trips to the a.m. peak hour that Sears does not add, and it was determined that there were no impacts on the surrounding traffic signals. Therefore no mitigation was required to any of the traffic signals. Currently parking is sufficient at the site; they will be improving the unimproved parking pad at the southeast corner of the site and while doing so will be restriping and adding 80 spaces to the site. Reviewed the building architecture, site improvements and landscaping as outlined in the staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the application in accordance with the draft resolution. Pete Jones, Sr. Vice President of Development, Western Athletic Club: • Said the application is straight forward, the concept being to create a separate identity for their building and to improve the parking lot serving both their building and Sears. He presented his business history, beginning in 1977 and opening 15 athletic clubs, and in Santa Clara County operating the Courtside in Los Gatos and the Decathalon Club in Santa Clara. He said he felt Cupertino was an under - served market and felt the Cupertino citizens would be supportive of the athletic club. Chair Lee opened the public hearing. Jennifer Griffin, Rancho Rinconada resident: • Said she was pleased to see the athletic club come to Cupertino as the city needs more businesses. Expressed concern about the parking lot and the need for increased security, particularly in the early morning hours when people have a tendency to leave personal belongings in their cars when going into athletic clubs. She also expressed concern about the future of the eastern part of the Main Street property where there was supposed to be a high end athletic club located also. She cautioned about closing the two parking entrances on the Stevens Creek Boulevard access to the mall, and to avoid the tunnel effect. She also recommended a left turn signal on the perimeter road coming out southbound. Chair Lee closed the public hearing. Aarti Shrivastava: Answered commissioners' questions. She stated that the Main Street property still shows that a health club is scheduled for that area. Com. Brophy: • Said Vallco has been an embarrassment to the community for many years, and he was pleased to see such a large high quality tenant coming in and occupying such an important place in Vallco. He said he was hopeful that it would have a positive effect on the rest of the mall. Vice Chair Miller: Said he welcomed the Bay Club to Cupertino, and did not feel the 5 a.m. opening hour would be a problem because of its location and early hours are standard for health clubs. Concurred with Com. Brophy's comments; and said he hoped the Bay Club's clientele would take advantage of the other shopping opportunities in the mall. Motion: Motion by Vice Chair Miller, second by Com. Sun, and unanimously carried 5 -0 -0 to approve Application ASA- 201 -04, U- 2011 -03 in accordance with the model resolution. 12 Cupertino Planning Commission 4 May 24, 2011 Planning Commission decision final unless appealed. OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS None REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Chair Lee reported there was discussion of a monopine, wireless facility to be placed on Rancho Deep Cliff, and also a discussion about the Capital Improvement Program. HOUSING COMMISSION No meeting MAYORS MONTHLY MEETING Every other meeting cancelled for new schedule. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: Com. Brophy reported on the following items discussed: • The Chamber of Commerce and the City sponsored a Mandarin language seminar in starting a business; • The city is at its highest level of office absorption since 1999 which was a legendary year; a building in downtown Palo Alto recently sold for $900 per square foot which is the tied with one building in Washington DC for the highest in the country. Also in Cupertino there has been an increased interest in retail spaces; some of the long vacant spaces have multiple bidders, and there are a number of restaurants looking to close deals in various places in Cupertino. • City Council is looking at placing a referendum on the November ballot to increase the transit occupancy tax, which is the hotel tax. The city is in process of talking to the hotel owners to get feedback. • Upcoming events include a June Mixer June 8 at Cupertino Inn; October 8 festival. • A number of development events are occurring; Cupertino Village expansion project expires in July; there is some discussion about an alternative or more modest change to it. The Shashi Hotel has demolished the former gas station and may be a precursor to starting construction soon. • He commented that in the past months there has been a complete turnaround in the economic outlook and there has been an increased level in all activity, including retail, office, and residential. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Written report submitted. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned to the next regular Planning Commission meeting scheduled for May 24, 2011, at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: Elizabeth Ellis, Recording Secretary 13 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CUPERTINO CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO. CA 95014 -3255 (408) 777 -3308 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • L)Iannin @cuhertino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 3 Agenda Date: June 14, 2011 Applications: TM- 2011 -01, U- 2011 -05, ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06 Applicant: Chris Weaver (Habitat for Humanity) Owner: Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley Location: Terminus of Cleo Avenue (APN 362 -31 -004) APPLICATION SUMMARY: 1. Tentative Map (TM- 2011 -01) to allow the subdivision of 0.3 acre into four lots and two common area lots for a single family residential development, 2. Use Permit (U- 2011 -05) to allow the development of four single - family residences on 0.3 acre, 3. Architectural and Site Approval (ASA - 2011 -06) for four, 2 -story single - family dwellings on 0.3 acre, 4. Parking Exception (EXC- 2011 -06) to allow a parking ratio of two open stalls per dwelling, in lieu of the required 2.8 stalls (garage and open) per dwelling, for a small lot, single - family residential development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of TM- 2011 -01, U -2011- 05, ASA - 2011 -06 and EXC - 2011 -06 in accordance with the model resolutions (Attachments 1- 4). PROJECT DATA: General Plan Land Use Designation Zoning Designation Environmental Assessment Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Proposed Residential Density Proposed Parking Required Parking (2.8 /dwelling) Building Height Medium Density Residential (10 -20 dwellings per acre) P(Res) - Planned Residential Development Categorically Exempt 13,212 square feet, 0.3 acre Vacant Single - Family Residential 13.33 dwellings/ acre 8 spaces 8 garage spaces +4 open spaces =12 spaces 2 stories, 26 feet 14 ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01, U- 2011 -05 - Cleo Housing June 14, 2011 BACKGROUND: Surrotiiidiiig Laiid Uses The applicant, Habitat for Humanity, proposes to develop a 4 -unit, small lot single - family residential development on a vacant, triangular- shaped lot on the south side of Cleo Avenue at its terminus. The project site is surrounded by vacant land and Highway 85 on the north and east sides, townhouses on the south side and a single - family residence to the west. Applicarit The applicant, Habitat for Humanity, Silicon Valley, was founded in 1986 as an independent affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International. Their mission is to work with the community to provide families with low incomes the opportunity to build and own their own homes. To this end, Habitat works in partnership with affordable housing providers and advocates, eliminating substandard living conditions. Last year, Habitat Silicon Valley completed construction of its 50th home built with volunteer labor. Laiid Acgiiisitioii Process In August 2005, the City acquired the excess property on Cleo Avenue from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for $615,000 for development of an affordable housing project. The City used Housing Mitigation fees for the purchase of the property. In December 2007, City Council agreed to transfer the property to Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley for the construction of four single family homes for low to very low income Cupertino households. The City rezoned the property from Multi- Family Residential (R3) to Planned Development Residential - P (Res) in March 2008. Also in 2008, the City set -aside an additional $250,932 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to be used for development costs. This loan is to cover predevelopment costs such as architecture, NEPA /CEQA preparation, civil engineering costs, etc. The loan is made at a below market interest rate with the developer and carries favorable repayment terms. The loan term is usually 55 years or more. However, if the homes ever cease to be affordable, then the loan becomes immediately due and payable to the City. Neigliborliood Outreach Habitat for Humanity has held two neighborhood meetings on November 6, 2008 and June 2, 2011 to familiarize its neighbors within a 300 -foot radius with the details of the project. Noticing of the hearing was placed in the Cupertino Courier and mailed to property owners within a 300 -foot radius. 15 Private Lots Common Area Lots Lot Designation 1 2 3 4 A B Lot Size (sq. ft.) 1,483 1,633 1,511 1,394 5,134 2,057 Dwelling Plan # 1 2 2 1 - - Dwelling Size (sq. ft.) 1,009 972 972 1,009 None None Total Floor Area Ratio 30% BACKGROUND: Surrotiiidiiig Laiid Uses The applicant, Habitat for Humanity, proposes to develop a 4 -unit, small lot single - family residential development on a vacant, triangular- shaped lot on the south side of Cleo Avenue at its terminus. The project site is surrounded by vacant land and Highway 85 on the north and east sides, townhouses on the south side and a single - family residence to the west. Applicarit The applicant, Habitat for Humanity, Silicon Valley, was founded in 1986 as an independent affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International. Their mission is to work with the community to provide families with low incomes the opportunity to build and own their own homes. To this end, Habitat works in partnership with affordable housing providers and advocates, eliminating substandard living conditions. Last year, Habitat Silicon Valley completed construction of its 50th home built with volunteer labor. Laiid Acgiiisitioii Process In August 2005, the City acquired the excess property on Cleo Avenue from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for $615,000 for development of an affordable housing project. The City used Housing Mitigation fees for the purchase of the property. In December 2007, City Council agreed to transfer the property to Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley for the construction of four single family homes for low to very low income Cupertino households. The City rezoned the property from Multi- Family Residential (R3) to Planned Development Residential - P (Res) in March 2008. Also in 2008, the City set -aside an additional $250,932 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to be used for development costs. This loan is to cover predevelopment costs such as architecture, NEPA /CEQA preparation, civil engineering costs, etc. The loan is made at a below market interest rate with the developer and carries favorable repayment terms. The loan term is usually 55 years or more. However, if the homes ever cease to be affordable, then the loan becomes immediately due and payable to the City. Neigliborliood Outreach Habitat for Humanity has held two neighborhood meetings on November 6, 2008 and June 2, 2011 to familiarize its neighbors within a 300 -foot radius with the details of the project. Noticing of the hearing was placed in the Cupertino Courier and mailed to property owners within a 300 -foot radius. 15 ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01, U- 2011 -05 - Cleo Housing June 14, 2011 Residents attending the neighborhood meetings had several questions (staff responses are in Italic below): 1) Is there a screening process for the potential buyers of the proposed homes? Yes, Habitat for Humanity screens all potential buyers who must: a) Meet certain income limitations, b) Currently live or work in Cupertino, c) Must contribute a certain amount of labor to build the liomes, d) Agree to take classes in home ownership. Habitat for Humanity will be available at the hearing to answer other questions you may leave about their buyer screening. 2) How will the common areas be maintained? Habitat for Humanity will require owners to record a maintenance agreement for the common areas and pay regularly into a fund to pay for landscape maintenance services. 3) The exterior building setbacks seem small. How will privacy of adjacent properties be protected? Homes on Lots #1 & #4 were redesigned with higli -sill, second floor windows facing adjacent properties to avoid privacy view impacts since there is not adequate space for privacy planting in the side yards. The Lot #3 home leas privacy trees, which are depicted on the plan set. DISCUSSION: Site & Building Design The site is accessed by a 20 -foot wide driveway leading to an eight (8) car open parking lot. Behind the parking, toward the rear of the lot, four small, 2 -story wood frame single - family residences are proposed to be clustered around a pedestrian pathway that connects the parking lot at one end to a community garden/ play area at the other end. The development area of the property is constrained by a 17.5 -foot wide existing storm drain and proposed sanitary sewer easement area on the east side of the property. The proposed side and front building setbacks range from 4 to 5 feet, while the rear setback is a minimum of 10 feet to 21 feet. Houses are proposed to have composition roofs and Hardie lap siding. For architectural interest, each house has a one story porch and wooden awning feature over a door and window. Please see the plan set (attachment 5) for the detailed drawings. Privacy Protection The development will have views into the residential property to the west and possible views to the properties to the south, which are separated from the project site by a 1 1 /2 story masonry wall topped by 3 -feet of lattice work. To address potential privacy concerns, the Plan 1 homes on Lots 1 & 4 were redesigned with high sill windows facing toward the abutting properties. The Plan 2 home on Lot 3 is proposing privacy trees next to the existing townhouses. Parking Exception The applicant requests a parking exception to reduce the parking requirements for the project from 2.8 stalls per unit (12 stalls: 8 enclosed /4 open) down to 2.0 parking stalls per dwelling (8 open stalls). The Planning Commission may grant a parking exception contingent on making 16 ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01, U- 2011 -05 - Cleo Housing June 14, 2011 the following findings. Staff believes the findings can be made and recommends approval of the parking exceptions (staff comments are in italics after each listed finding): Parking Excevtion Findings a. The literal enforcement of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter. The intent of the parking ordinance is to regulate parking of vehicles which are unsiglitly, oversized or which are detrimental to property values or the peace and enjoyment of neiglboring property owners or residents, and provide adequate amounts of parking for various land use activities. Staff believes parking will be adequate for the proposed units at 2.0 spaces per unit for the following reasons: 1) The lots and dwellings are small, about 1,500 square foot lots and 1,000 square foot liomes with just 2 bedrooms and 1.5 batlis. There is practically no expansion potential for these liomes; 2) All of the parking is open and cannot be converted to storage as miglit liappen in a garage, so there will not be the potential of any furtlier reduction in parking supply; and Habitat for Humanity's development experience with small -size liome projects indicates that two parking spaces per dwelling is an adequate parking ratio for smaller -size liomes. b. The granting of the exception will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public safety, health and welfare. Presently the proposed parking lot is set back a minimum of 30 feet from the property line and screened from the neigliborliood by a minimum 6-foot wooden fence. Furtlier, since the site planning is severely constrained on the property, any additional parking will remove landscaped areas and potentially make the parking lot more visible to Cleo Avenue. c. The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification and the minimum variance to accomplish the purpose. The exception request amounts to a difference of only four stalls for four houses. d. The proposed exception will not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. The project leas little potential for increased parking demand and the requested exception amounts to only four parking stalls, periodic additional demands by guests of residents can be accommodated by available street parking in the cul -de -sac. Other Departments' Review The City's Public Works Department, Building Division, the Santa Clara County Fire Department, and the Cupertino Sanitary District reviewed the project and have no objections to the project. Their pre- hearing comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval or project modifications. Environmental Assessment The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Evironmental Policy Act (NEPA). The project was determined to be categorically exempt from NEPA by the Director of Community Development on April 22, 2011. Under CEQA the project is exempt under Section 15332: In -Fill Development Projects. Projects considered under this category must meet the following conditions: a) consistent with general plan and zoning; b) within City limits, parcel under 5 acres and substantially surrounded by 17 ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, TM- 2011 -01, U- 2011 -05 - Cleo Housing June 14, 2011 development; c) property has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; d) site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services and e) approval of project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Construction measures will be incorporated in the housing to ameliorate interior noise to acceptable levels. Prepared by: Colin Jung, AICP Senior Planner Vera Gil, Senior Planner Reviewed bv: s /Gary Chao Gary Chao City Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. TM- 2011 -01 Resolution 2: U- 2011 -05 Resolution 3: ASA- 2011 -06 Resolution 4: EXC- 2011 -06 Resolution 5: Plan Set Approved by: / s / Aarti Shrivastava Aarti Shrivastava Community Development Director im ATTACHMENT 1 TM- 2011 -01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 0.30 ACRE INTO FOUR RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND TWO COMMON AREA LOTS FOR A SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON CLEO AVENUE (APN 362 -31 -004) SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 2) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. 4) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated there with is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 7) The proposed project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Subdivision Map, file no. TM- 2011 -01, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the sub conclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM- 2011 -01 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM- 2011 -01 Applicant: Chris Weaver (for Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley) Location: Cleo Avenue (APN 362 -31 -004) 19 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on plan sets titled "Tentative Map /Cleo Avenue Project /4 Unit Residential Subdivision ", dated May 18, 2011, consisting of sheets labeled TM1, T1, C1 & C2, a Proximity Map, a Right -of -Way Dedication exhibit, and a color rendering showing potential new home design, except as amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 3. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall demolish and remove all structures on the property. All demolished buildings and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of demolition permit. 4. STORM DRAINAGE & UTILITIY EASEMENTS At the final subdivision map stage, the applicant shall provide other easements as needed for routing of storm drainage and private utilities. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5. STREET WIDENING Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 6. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 7. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 8. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and /or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 9. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post - development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak storm water flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff of the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on -site (e.g., via buried pipes) as necessary to avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation of the culvert to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 10. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 11. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG &E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and /or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. 12. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: h. Street Tree $ Per current fee schedule $ Per current fee schedule $ 3,000.00 $ TBD ** $ Per current fee schedule $ Per current fee schedule By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG &E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off -site and On -site Improvements Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off -site and On -site Improvement On -site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 21 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 13. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 14. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 15. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 16. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and /or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 17. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 18. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading /erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 19. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 20. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non - standard appurtenances in the public road right -of -way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 22 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 21. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 22. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 23. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 24. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 25. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 26. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. 27. SANTA CLARA WATER DISTRICT CLEARANCE Provide Santa Clara water district approval before recordation of the final map. The developer shall pay for and obtain Water District permit for activities or modifications within the District easement or fee right of way or affecting District facilities. 28. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to issuance of building permits. 29. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG &E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and /or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. 30. SAN IOSE WATER COMPANY CLEARANCE Provide San Jose Water Company approval before recordation of the final map. 31. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the San Jose Water Company all waterlines and appurtenances installed to their standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject development. 23 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 32. OTHER AGENCY CLEARANCES Provide all necessary clearances and approvals from other agencies (both public and private) before recordation of the final map. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/ SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /s /Timm Borden Timm Borden, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 45512 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Planning Commission 24 ATTACHMENT 2 U- 2011 -05 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOUR, TWO - STORY, SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS IN A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT P(RES) ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CLEO AVENUE TERMINUS (APN 362 -31 -004) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U- 2011 -05 Applicant: Chris Weaver (for Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley) Property Owner: City of Cupertino Location: Cleo Avenue terminus (APN 362 -31 -004) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the City's zoning ordinances. c) The proposed project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the initial study, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,: The application for a Use Permit, Application no. U- 2011 -05 is hereby recommended for approval, and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no U- 2011 -05 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 25 Resolution No. U- 2011 -05 June 14, 2011 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. APPROVED EXHIBITS This approval is based on Exhibits titled: "CLEO AVENUE/ Cupertino, California" dated May 18, 2011 consisting of 9 sheets labeled: Architectural Site Plan, Plan 1 (Floor Plan), Plan 1 Exterior Elevations, Plan 1 Alt (Floor Plan), Plan 1 Alt Exterior Elevations, Plan 2 (Floor Plan), Plan 2 Exterior Elevations, L -1, and GreenPoint Rated Checklist: Single Family, prepared by KTGY Group, Inc., except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. USE PERMIT APPROVAL Approval is granted for four two- story, single - family detached residences in a residential planned development zoning district, P(RES). 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The City shall deduct four residential dwelling units from the General Plan residential development allocation (Neighborhood - Other Areas) for this development. 4. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. ASA- 2011 -06, EXC- 2011 -06, and TM- 2011 -01 shall be applicable to this approval. 5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission G: Planning � PDREPORT RES � 2011 � U- 2011 -05 res. doc 26 ATTACHMENT 3 ASA- 2011 -06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT FOR FOUR, TWO -STORY SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS ON 0.30 ACRE AT CLEO AVENUE (APN 362 -31 -004) SECTION L• PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA- 2011 -06 Applicant: Chris Weaver for Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley Property Owner: City of Cupertino Location: southerly terminus of Cleo Avenue (APN- 362 -31 -004) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria: a) Abrupt changes in building scale have been avoided. A gradual transition related to height and bulk has been achieved between new and existing buildings. b) Design harmony between new and existing buildings have been preserved and the materials, textures and colors of new buildings harmonize with adjacent development with design and color schemes, and with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which it is situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots have been concealed. Ground cover or various types of pavements have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees have been avoided. Lighting for development is adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and shielding to adjoining property owners. 27 Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -06 June 14, 2011 c) This new development, abutting an existing residential development, has been designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, fences and other appropriate design measures. d) The proposed project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof,: 1. The application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA- 2011 -06 is hereby approved, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA- 2011 -06 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Planning Division: 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set titled: "CLEO AVENUE/ Cupertino, California" dated May 18, 2011 consisting of 9 sheets labeled: Architectural Site Plan, Plan 1 (Floor Plan), Plan 1 Exterior Elevations, Plan 1 Alt (Floor Plan), Plan 1 Alt Exterior Elevations, Plan 2 (Floor Plan), Plan 2 Exterior Elevations, L -1, and GreenPoint Rated Checklist: Single Family, prepared by KTGY Group, Inc., except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/ property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and /or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. U- 2011 -05, TM- 2011 -01 and EXC- 2011 -06 shall be applicable to this approval. 4. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Architectural and Site Approval is granted for the architectural design and site planning for the Cleo Avenue development of four single - family residences on 0.30 acre. The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 5. FENCING Onsite fencing and common boundary fencing with the property to the west shall be removed and replaced with a minimum 6 -foot tall wooden fence that screens the parking lot from public street views as depicted on the approved plans. Any fencing within the front yard of the project lot shall be in accordance with the City's fence ordinance. Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -06 June 14, 2011 6. LANDSCAPE PROTECT SUBMITTAL Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full landscape project submittal per section 14.15.040 of the Landscaping Ordinance. The Water - Efficient Design Checklist (Appendix A of Chapter 14.15), Landscape and Irrigation Design Plans, and Water Budget Calculations shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 7. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include, but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune -up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run -off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscape and irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit." 8. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE A maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his /her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the landscape installation report is submitted. a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and water requirements for established landscapes. b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de- thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructions to emission devices. c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be size - adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 9. CONSTRUCTION HOURS Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays. The developer shall be responsible for educating all contractors, subcontractors and volunteers of said construction restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer - appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. 10. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 11. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, material, architectural treatments and /or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any exterior changes 29 Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -06 June 14, 2011 determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall require a modification approval with neighborhood input. 12. WINDOWS At the building permit state, the applicant shall submit construction plans that include a window and door schedule that provides certain minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) -rated windows and doors for various project houses as follows: a) All second story windows with line of sight to Highway 85 shall be rated 35 STC or greater. b) All second story windows without line of sight to Highway 85 shall be rated 30 STC or greater. c) Ground floor windows and doors shall be rated 26 STC or greater. 13. VENTILATION To help control noise, each dwelling shall be provided with a forced -air, mechanical ventilation system. 14. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and /or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 15. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2011, at a regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Planning Commission 30 ATTACHMENT 4 EXC- 2011 -06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE PARKING ORDINANCE, CMC SECTION 19.100, TO ALLOW A PARKING RATIO OF TWO OPEN STALLS PER DWELLING, IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED 2.8 STALLS (GARAGE AND OPEN) PER DWELLING, FOR A SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF CLEO AVENUE (APN 362 -31 -004) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC- 2011 -06 Applicant: Chris Weaver (Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley) Location: Terminus of Cleo Avenue (APN 362 -31 -004) SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Exception to the Parking Ordinance to allow a parking ratio of 2.0 stalls per dwelling, in lieu of the required 2.8 stalls per dwelling, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to this exception application: a. The literal enforcement of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter, in that the intent of the parking ordinance is to regulate parking of vehicles which are unsightly, oversized or which are detrimental to property values or the peace and enjoyment of neighboring property owners or residents, and provide adequate amounts of parking for various land use activities. Staff believes parking will be adequate for the proposed units at 2.0 spaces per unit for the following reasons: 1) The lots and dwellings are small, about 1,500 square foot lots and 1,000 square foot homes with just 2 bedrooms and 1.5 baths. There is practically no expansion potential for these homes; 2) All of the parking is open and cannot be converted to storage as might happen in a garage, so there will not be the potential of any further reduction in parking supply; and Habitat for Humanity's development experience with small -size home projects indicates that two parking spaces per dwelling is an adequate parking ratio for smaller -size homes. b. The granting of the exception will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public safety, health and welfare. Presently, the proposed parking lot is set back a minimum of 30 feet from the property line and screened from the neighborhood by a minimum 6 -foot wooden fence. Further, since the site planning is severely constrained on the property, any additional parking will remove landscaped areas and potentially make the parking lot more visible to Cleo Avenue. 31 Resolution No. EXC- 2011 -06 June 14, 2011 The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification and the minimum variance to accomplish the purpose. The exception request amounts to a difference of only four stalls for four houses. d. The proposed exception will not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. The project has little potential for increased parking demand and the requested exception amounts to only four parking stalls. Periodic extra demands by guests of residents can be accommodated by available street parking in the cul -de -sac. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Exception to the Parking Ordinance is hereby recommended for approval. That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based are contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC- 2011 -06, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011 and are incorporated by reference herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Planning Commission G: / Planning /PDREPORT/RES /2011 /EXC- 2011- 06 res. doc 32 � , � � ' d , r 1 r i 1 r i 1 � � � I � � . � . � I � .l ._ I �� I �SFNF � � � � ' � ��SFNF K ������'��� i , W I Z � � � W � � ( � � Z � W ' � � � � i � � i I � i ! �fd OIP � � � � � I I R/W r� � � 51DE1YALK ---�---- � � i � I f� N � APN.• 982-51-Q30 ecartsr / cRONc � rva� �T, �Fd1'OIP � Fd 1" OIP � Av M++ ,+ •/�ee.+ ---- � �. . .� �� • ` \ � """"` , .. _ , \, , . \ �� \ �� �� ��� �•�.a: �_ � _ _ _ r^ ` - � - � - � r -�� � � � � � � . Y � Q � � � CLEO AVENUE f � , i ;� 4rE � s N \`,, �` � `� \ . � � _ • . . .—•—• . . .—�— . .— \�� �` • ' �\� \\� C�� ��� _ —._--�-----------------�----------- s �� ` • � �� SFNF� SFNFJ i M4T1QOr'W _ P � R? ` � ��¢ ii.�s' F� � i j �, , � � � � , � ! � � � � .. � ' AP111.• 3BE-31-009 �� a O u�' �,�� Pif�` I I C�CalAS 5 Fil1QLY a 3 i` '� . JL i � ZUQT1�D PARTNERSAIP � L � �` � i � SIIVGL� FdAlILY RBS. i \ � � ; LOT A 1 P t ` , � , P � � s�a4 sF. Re � � - _ , � f ' I -- � i Pa ; � 1------------ - , � �� z � I � � I TRA CT NO 789 LOT 1 LOT 9 � � � ( LOT 8 � LOT 7 � u� o��� ��� ° 4 ' i i i � � I ' � � i � � � �� ° � �, •� ,, � . • . �. �s�� sF. i i ,= 7�� = _ ±;''`___ �"�_- �v�__ ��� _ �'� UNIT C i ��� � i �^� � ' ` � ��a + ��`� � i ------ _-_� -�-- -t ��L____ � _ �_ a 10 � ------ -- .�1 �.., T � E LA�'4 1394 SF. SF. T- ------- ------ -- -�-� P�R ---�_ t r_ 'G�i'�42�WI IA.lt 1 � r"� ., I i —f----- I �..�''- --------� i r-- � i_{-__� .. ` ' ---L- ' ' S o0' ---L-- TRACT NO Q249 ,- `"' � � PSDf � REMOVE _�1 _ � �SDRE i ,, . � �� L 0 T 1 I L 0 T 2 L 0 T.37 � L D T 3 � � � � � I BLACK W LNUT 1REE ''� ��...- � � I �ssrr��ra 1T.iP e `�� � , � � � LOT 4 � LOT 5, LOT 37 , LOT 6 � LOT 7 � LOT 8 LOT .37 � � I � ( ( � � � ' � ' � LOT 9 � •\� ' I I I I I I j�or �o �� � � i � i � � i � i 1(1 7 Z' .M V�RIFQ C � t al �d1i1ER TYPICAL HALF STREET SECTION CLEO AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC NOT TO SGtF LOT 2 LOT A sz � �ss 4 — - �� �� � Sk LOT B i R � L33 OT 3 + LOT 4 LEGEND (� F�087�10 � � EAE EMERGENCY ACCESS EA.SENENT IEE 1N(3RESSlEGRESS EASEMEAi1T PPE PRNATE PAR1aN(3 EASENENT PR�JE PRNATE UTLJIYE�I9�IB�fT PSOE PRNATE BTORM DRAN EA9B�B�T P�RE PRNATE STORM DRAINAGE RELE4SE EASEMENT PSE PUBLIC SERVICE E��SEMENT 80E BTORM DRA�1 EA9�B�IT 88E 8ANRARY 8EWBt E��TTD C8D � �►����� � NDK`.AT68 TR�'�O RBYIAN EASEMENT NOTES O NOICATEB PBE, EAE, � i PN1JE O NDICAT� P'PE O NDICATEB OOM�AOt� ORIVEWAY � LOT �INE - LINE DATA PARKING EASEMENT - UNE DATA .� '� � \�� � �� N -W E— SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 v� s�► � � �� �� � '9� � SEE ��s� ETA�L "A" -9� � � � � � `�� � � '�► � ,�` � � �;� •� \ �'��.,�� � UNIT A LOT 2 / 33 31DEWALK EASEMENT - UNE DATA ND. BEAitl�Ki DIB'I'I1NCE 81 N70'1i�!'W 1A7� � 8 �'OOm" E 7 7� s9 s oo�s�ye� e arr Q4 N 04'a637"W 7aS 60 N00'118�"W �a�a e0 N JO'�80P W � 1� PARKING EASEMENT - CURVE DiATA Na r�owe � �eron� R1 6.0� oY"�41• 7.D� � ,� ,���,� �,� w so.00► �a� ta.'►o' � ao.ts se�asas� so.aar � � ��� � � 2QA0� s0' 1�' 19' 1� R► S�0' 00"00'OQ' T� e. ...... ............� _ � VICINITY MAP NO 8G1LE . �` � � NOTES PRO�C�NAML CLEOAV9rUE PtiOJECT � aw� cmr oF cu�n�o BUBDMDER: HABiTAT FOR NUMANfTY� �JOOW YAtJ.EY 61SVALLEY WAY MNPITAS. CA. 96�006 1R�lli�llt LEST'ER IKEOAIY� R.C.E.30,5�D D�IRES MARCH 81�2�'12 ALLEO ENOINEERNOOONPANY 5170 WILI.IMAB ROJID $AN JOSE� CA 961�7 TEL (40B) �41-1980 FI1X (408� 241�0�4T ASSESSOR� PCl NO: 382�91-00� PROP'08ED USE 4 81NiiLEfAM�.Y RE81DEN1UIL (SFltj Ut�l'S D0ST1N0 US� VACANT LAT E�STINO LONNC�c P IRF8) PI�'08ED ZONIN(� �� LAND USE R�DENT1AL EXISTMO BUL�NC� NOME �TM� �& NO IWOINN VVE1L� WATER 8UPPLY 8AN J08E WATER OOMPANY FRE PRO'i�CT10N: CiiY OF CiJPEATNO 8TORM SEWB�& CRY OF CUPER'tN0 SANRARY SEWEF� CUPBt11N0 8AN�Ti,RY D13TRICT CONTi0l1R� FIELD 8URNEY (NAVD' 20) -1' M�1/N. TOTAL AREIe 0.303 A�REB PRCPOSED NO.OF LATB� 8(4 BFI� LOTS 8 2 OOMMON L078) NEW STNEETNM�E NONE srn�r r�� �a cnY oF cu�nNO MoNE �toPOS�� N � � � � �� ��� � ���� � ,a►�li��:.�_ , »- TENTATIVE MAP CLEO AVENUE PROJECT 4 UNIT RESIDENTIAL SUBDNISION BEING A SUBDM810N OF T1�E REAL PROPEitTY DE� N TFE ar�cro�s o�u oaa�oes�-o�-0� �oo� �s 000u�rr No. a e�oeo�, oN auc3us-r z�, �, iN niE o�ce oF TME �coRU� oF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, AND LYNI(3 BVT�ELY VW1HN 71� CITY OF CUPERTINO �� $ l� CALlFORNIA � 0 � M � N � o� �� Y � �� '� a � �� 0 � ' �� � �' s �� � d. i j .� � � ���� ��$�� a ���� ��i� _ � NN �s� �� <f5 0� n z � �Z� ��v � > � s � � � � — W � a � Z � O a��Z � F W � O � �"' � � � � C � s+��r � OF ti /� • APN.• 982-31-030 ---- � e o, �` ` 28�.88 R�i = —' � 1 ~ �� �ss.sa Nv ALllASI / CFIONG � _.._.�.---- � � ��� � • (T�ACANT LOT) � � � O � �OODED� PRO,�CT BENqi�AAR1C �0 � 28�r46 INV � �' � S 89° 08' 42" E � � ti � 'l3.84' �d UtU Unea Overheod Utll Lines � � �• I � OH OH O 1 11 � � D�0 2 55 — �`, �o.�s � �M �� Woter � a ' \ k 289.70INV ir rell f � ` ?95 6" DICL Water � � , � w w W w � � LEC3END ��� b � � — — PROF�ERTY L!E � � — --�-- — MONIiEPIT f� MOt�lMENT LPE � �° (� � � 5t o G118 LNE � � � � w ��� � ELSCTRRlAL � ��� ��Y — s — a—r— BAt�AIiY�WERiNH — � -- o-♦o — 810�IiEWERiMi , \ . , � w Pi�. B�( Z ` `. k SCALE IN FEET -- _ d . � a \ �� . a� a ounm � — — 3 �.� � ` 0 10 20 30 40 50 . � � 10' PVC \ �� ����� ` � OHlNEVIMIY �� aa ss ss es � � �� �� .E�AVENUE 3 � �� �,, °� � � � ��o� ,� � � o �� � o ,,�,, -�—�-x� � � N `� ` �� � � ��0 �� � M ♦ o � � Matlbox � � � �'� ❑ {RR �iKiATqNCAMROL800! � N ` �o \ �� \ `� � � � WIITER MEIF�i � r _ — — — g \ � ` `� o` GPJ � � tnoww� $� -- --�--- . 'lF- — 4� P � " \ ,��° \ � � �S� � vr�r� vxvE sooc � � . � a � �� `' `'� R Fwwu� � � � � N 47° 16' 03" W � \� o � ,� � \ ,�" �� � � n � 1$.28 � � / '�\ \ \ �., (� sw e�acoFw�uc � .- � s �, � . � a �c. o \'o. � �.� � ooNC roP oF ooNC� � I APN.• 38z-81-008 CECILIAS'S F.4MILY LIMIT'ED PARTNERSHIP � SINGLE FAMILY RES. � (ONE' STORY) � � A � � � W �* N �� � O � � � � 6 (E) GARAOE � ��� � � / � s �� � a� �' � * y �' j 'd � �� ( � 6 , �► 80E SI�Oti�l Dfm►N FJISEREt�ti � `� � � � c < + o � � ,` �� ��, . � TC 7�OP OF dJFi 1 � . �� a �a. I� I +� ��`' � o � y. � �� roP oF w►v� � ` �� � '` �i�, ! � \ ; `\`. �, � � . \ �. a,� �. 8� , `\ ,``� � ��'+ ' a`� ' ,�f+�� ` � i r .vv ��—`�3�� ��8� � \ � \ � � . � �, sx� '� �ga�� g��� �� � � R a ° ,o \ �� � � . YaR `` � _ pp4 �� � �q' * :� w \ � � � �, � � \ ♦ �' � +� y t5 N N'8 \` � S �DE.G y� � O I3 6C � r � i � � � � ( � ��� _ _ � 1 cb D� n� I � � � �a � �� `.c� �'� � p � � � I I I � ' �� �� � \ � � � � - — � `� � � � � I � � I 3 I \ , � � � '�r c«�a Pacb a ♦ � � q W � � ` � � ` I ' 6 c� '�� ci� �� �` � e� =' 2 � � I ,� � � \ : � � I ��� �°' 9 o s � � � I � � . W G 1 ree ` �--------------- v � � ``� � c� � � , � k � '9� � �� � `` � �19 as.8 T �b'1 • � Z9Q8 Gnd � I �' I / �` �� � e � e c�' ; I - � �``�� �,a �� � � �' � � � � �,S � �s \ � \ � � � ` Tf�% C T lV O 789 � tib \ �� � ,`� `° • � � ' k LOT �0 � � , ( � �,a �9 � � �° :�� � �� �� � �� \ > L � '� � \ ` i � s T 7 � , � ,. \\. , ` � � � a � � . � � �, � l � a�. 2W�.?Z RMA i � d I f �'� \ `�� ` '�` � � � VJ � O � , , I 1 � � •, , p, ,, •, aes.s� iNV j r --- _ _ _ _ .�.l� v � P` ��� � \ �. \ S �Z° , " � � � j � a ?� ADDITIONAL TOPO SW OF PROPERTY L1NE � O 5� T � �� �� �� `�F SC�1LE 1' =10' � Z � � I �' _ 4 r �?.�� � = F � � �'"` � Dense Berry Buahsa c#'� '�� � `�`' ` *� � � � 1� � O L�J! � x � � � ti�� �c��� k �� .�c�� d� � I/ ��'`, M� . � 2o3A6 RIM � Q V V k �• � � � Denae ` �, �a B �� � 286Z1 INV � � r x Mult1—Trunk � � ' � i \ ���� Blaok Watnut �,�'�� \h x� ��� � \ �'`,� ��o S 37 ° Z� 17" E � .�, 9 � e I 1 R 0" � d d 1 I 4�� ,�� a o 294 �\ �,�� r /'* °` •� � � � 7.39 � A � 0 0 d` 16' 12� b C�`� ,��Q p' \,� � �� � "' _' — — � _ � _ TO BE �r 7 � � 1 � � ,�,� �a � � �� `7 SHEET � _ - � ' ���� ��� �� ���� •Y � � ` � . t E Con ete Pane a 4 ��� ( N'°=d _� _�.� ��` �� oF 14_Tre o � wn R `w. A c � -� �r j T SEE ABOVE FOR , A � DDIT , IO w WAL 1 sH�s _ _� �. .� �� � T � _ _ _� � .� �� �� _ ._� _ �� _� � � _ - _... � �IG '• 1 .V� .�1 � / n'� � \ �.\ ?. . 1� I�rVt7�V'\r[7�V �,V'L�I1�� DRAINNO N0. �°' ` 284.98 RIM ----�� . , '� -i - ~ �� , '� �A8.63 INV (E) ONSITE GRADINQ NOZES �,/ �-eeroC \ \. O �. HOODED INLET � � � e Q' Z90.78 TC � PROJBCT BENCFIMARK 7. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS (408) 777-3104 FOR DRAINAGE AND FlNAL GRADE 17• APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN APPLJES ON�Y Ta 7HE IXCAVATION. � �� � \ ����� INSPEC'iION, WHICH INCLUDES DRAW LINES AND ROOF DRAINS/DOWNSPWTS. PLACQ�AENT AND COMPACTION OF NA7lJRAL EARTH MA'1ERIALS, AND TO ��� � 1FiE DRAINAGE AND DRAINAGE INLET STRUCTURES. CON'TRACTORS Z� \ �� y ^ S� OB� 42� E 2• CON7RACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CON'iROL AND INSURING THE AREA SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL IMPROVEMEN75 TO THE RECOMMENOA710N AND ���i � � � � ADJACENT TO TfiE WORK 1S LEFf tN A CtFAN CONQITION. SPEqFlCAT10NS OF THE SDILS ENGINEER. ��� ` �° 13 84' V - �.7tJ.1.7 - D'-�O'''J' 4� rJ6� ��,� wat� L= 21.52' � ir roli f � 6" DICL Watar w w w � 2 - � - 10' PVC � m m .Ea AVE U S,� - o G Mailbox ► i -------------------_� N 47° 98' 03" W- 18.28' APJV .962,�1-�13 C�IAS3FAMQ�Y LA�T�PARTN�.4fLlP S�FAAlbYRB£ ��' K �rti • 3. T}iE C�NTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW STD. DETAIL 6-4 ON 7REE PROTECTION 16. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBIE FOR DEIERMINiNG THE AMOUNT OF �V PRIOR TO ACCOMPLJSHING ANY WORiC OR REMOVING ANY TREES. ENGINEERm FILL IMPORT MATERIAL THAT IS TO BE REQUIRED, ANO IS � Ovefiead Utll Llnea � ALSO RE5PON51BLE FOR DEIERMINING 1HE AMOUNT OF EXCESS D(PORT $ �• ry p � 4. UTIUZE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTlCES (Bh6P'S), AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE MA7ERIAL THAT MAY BE REQUIRm TO 8E REMOVED FROM THE S1TE. - K • ADJU$TTOORADE WA'!ER RESOURCES CON'iROL BOARD, FOR ANY ACIIVITY, NMICH DISTURBS SQIL TME EN�INEER A5SUME5 NO RESPONSIBIUTY FOR E511MAlED EARZIi 2�'J.46(E�RIM WORK SHOWN HEREON. ACIIJAL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES MAY VARY �• a � 5. ALL ROOF DRAINS AND/OR DOWN SPOUTS SHALL BE DRAINm SHEET FLOW DUE lU 51TE CONDITIONS AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. R �g,�p ��y N 2R AWAY FROM 1HE BUILDING AND MAYBE COLLFCTED BY DFtAINAGE INLET 1B, qLL IXISTING CONICRETE SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER BROKEN OR CANNECTED TO PUBUC STORM DRAIN FACILITY. IF AND ONLY IF THE DRAINAGE w IS IN THE HILLSIDE AREA CAN THE WAIER BE DIRECTLY CONNEC7ED TO Ti�IE DAMAfim DURIN(3 CONSTRUC110N SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO � � PUBUC STORM DRAIN. 'fHE 5ATISFAC710N OF THE CITY ENGINEER. \ � � � � �� � B 20, ALL CONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VERIFlCA�ION OF a ' a ��' ry9 6- ROUGH PAD SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 0.10' OF DESIRED LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING U11UT1ES IN THE FlELD. ALL � x �',��'' PAD ELEVATION AND WITNIN 0.06' OF LEVEI» � � � $� CONIRACTORS SHALL CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.} � --�- � � ,�p � 7. ALL CONIRACTORS WILL BE RESPON518LE FOR THE VERIFlCAl10NS OF (� 1-800-842-2444) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGWG. EXCAVATION FOR DEPTH AND LOCAl10NS OF ALL EXISTING U11lJT1ES IN THE FIELD. UNDEROROUND FACIUTIES SHALL NOT BE PERNITTED PRIQR TO f \� e��� ry� UTIUTY DATA MAY BE INCOMPLEIE AND LOCA'�ONS SHOWN ON PLANS CONTACIING UNDERGROUND SERVlCE ALERT. UNOER NO CIRCUNSTANCES � � � �1► �,� �p,:s A �j SCALE IN FEET ARE APPROXIMA7E AND FOR GENERAL INFORMAl10N ONLY. WILL IXCAVATION COMMENCE BEFORE BONG ISSUED AN IDEN�IFICAl10N � ���� ,\ �, Z' C2 v� NUMBER FROM U.S.A. (SECTION 4210.1 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE). 0 10 20 , S. All GRADING AND EARTHWORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE NITH THE a1� `� �' � g � SPECIFlCA710NS AND RECOMMENDA710NS IN THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED 8Y 21. DEPTH OF OVER EXCAVATION NALL 8E DETERMINED IN 1HE FlELD BY � , G � . � T. MAKDISSY CONSlILT1NG, INC., 18228 SEEBREE LANE, MON1E SFRENO SO1LS ENGINEER. � � G G CALJFORNIA 95030, (408) 857-0310, PROJECT No. E1227-1, DATED FEBRUARY ` g � k ;l� � �� �, ��, � 4, 2011 AND SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SIiPERV1510N OF 'TFiE PROJECT SQILS 22• L4YOUT NOTE: � ENGINEER. \ \� `� � �� �a �� � ! VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND OIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, 'O \ � � �' ,�� `� 9. THE CONIRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH 501LS ENGINEER TO DETERMINE IF PARKING AREAS, WALKS, RAMPS AND PAT10 AREAS W/ARCHITECT WN \ � J t�l THE STRIPPING MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR LANDSCAPE USE. IF THE AND/OR OWNER PRIOR TO START OF WORK. �� t �� �\ yC� � MATERIAL IS NOT SUITABLE OR IS IN IXCESS, TtiE CONTRACTOR IS - � � �; CZ � gy RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSING OF ALL S1R{PING OFFSITE. FlRE DEPT NOTES � E � � � � $ L k ' � 5TRIPPING SUITABIE AS TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPiLED AT OWNER'S o�� o \� �� e� q� �,9�`' 15� � DlRECT10N. �. FlRE SPRINKLERS REqUfRED: IN ALL NEW ONE- AND 1w0-FAMILY DWELLJNGS. NO1E: COVERED � � � � � �. ��c• PORC4iES, PATIOS, BALCONfES, AND ATT1C SPACES MAY REQUIRE FlRE SPRINKLER COVERAGE �°� ,� �a � ;� y �� 10. ANY [MPOR7ED FlLL 41AZERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY ZHE SOlLS A STATE OF CAUFORNIA LJCENSED (C-16) FlRE PR07EC110N CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ° q� .3 ' 1� ENGINEER PRIOR TO BONG OEUVERm TO THE 51TE. PLANS, CALCULA110N5, A COMPLEfE PERMtT APPLICATION AND APPROPRIATE FEES TO THIS � �� �, ` �, ,�► Tl' � '8 • � �� DEPARTMETIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNiNG 1}iEIR WORK. CRC SEC. � � 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WATER FOR DUST CONTROL AND EARTH R313.2 AS ADOPTED AND AMENDED BY CUPMC � � �� , COMPACTiON. THE CONIRAC�OR WILL BE RESPON518LE FOR ANY DAMAGE � �� (� �� � �� ��i I ��g4 ��' � OR COMPLAfNTS DUE TO DUST CAUSm BY HIS OPERA710N. 2• POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES SHALL BE PROlECTED FROM CONTAMINATION CAUSED BY FlRE � � `s �� �o• (� PROTECTION WATER SUPPLIES. IT 15 - fHE RESPONSIBIUIY OF T}IE APPLICANT AND ANY � WNTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS TO CONTACT ?}1E WATER PURVEYJR SUPPLYING 1HE SITE � � L�� 12. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES AT TIiE BOUNDARY LINES �iALL BE � e- \ �' � CONSTRUC'iED IN SUCH A MANNER 'THAT ADJACENT FENCES OR WALLS WILL � SUCH PROJECT, AND TO COMPLY WIlH 7}1E REQUIREMENTS OF TF{AT PURVEYOR. SUCH � REqUiREAiIIQVTS SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO 'THE DESIGN OF ANY WA1ER-BASED FlRE � 4 ��� � (S1 NOT BE DAMAf�D. NO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE PERMIT'1ED WIININ 0.5 FEET EA � PROTECTION SY51Ea�t5, AND/OR FlRE SUPPRESSION WATER SUPPLY SY5IEMS OR STORAGE �' o N d � j/� � AC P VEA�ENT �'a` �� t� � OF FENCES OR WALLS W!'THOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. CONTAINERS THAT MAY BE PHY5ICALLY CONNECTED IN ANY MANNER TO AN APPLIANCE CAPABLE � a��" �.��, � a '� ON S� a' Z AB� � r - � 13. EROSIONS CONIROL: ALL 410UNDING AND AREAS SUBJECT TO ER0510N �F CAUSING CONTAMINATtON OF THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY OF THE PURVEYOR OF RECORD. 5 � � FINAL APPROVAL OF 1HE SY5TEh1 S UNDER CONSIDERATION WIIL NOT 6E GRANTED BY 'fHIS � s 'e� �� '8 � ti�• O SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WiTH EROSION CONTROL PLANIING AS PER �) r � I .0 � �O. G� C/ LANDSCAPE ARCNITECT PLANS. OFFICE UNT1L COMPUANCE WITH THE REpUIREMENTS OF THE WAl'ER PURVEYOR OF RECORD ARE �' _� o�` � ���► � DOCUMENTED BY THAT PURVEYOR AS HAVING BEEN MET BY 1}iE APPUCANT(S). 2007 CFC SEC. 1 7 �" (E) tiARAGE �� ��9 ?x� ��'� 94.58 �� �\ � �,o � � 14. THIS QRADING PLAN ILLUSTRATES THE PROPOSED GRADING FOR T}tE 903.3.5 AND HEALTH AND SAFETY COQE 13114.7 �� � � � `'�". \I � �+ PROJECT. FlNISH DRAINAGE SWALES AND DRAINAGE INLE15 HAVE BEEN S 3. PREMISES IDEN71FlCA110N: APPROVED NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACm ON ALL NEW `��, � � INDICA'fED HEREON AND MUST BE fNCORPORATED INTO 7HE FlNAL AND DQSTING BUILDINGS IN SUCH A POSfTtON AS TQ 8E PUIINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM � � A \ 27G '� � � UWDSCAPE GRADING. fT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBtUTY OF THE 7}{E STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. NUMBERS SHALL BE CONTRAST WITH THE1R � � � � � �, • OWNER AND HIS DESIGNATED CONTRACTOR(S) TO INSURE THAT THESE /1 •. •\ g' k � � BACKGROUND. CFC SEC. 505 � VNLUT 3 •�\ °j y � � a� � DRAINAGE SWALES AND INLETS ARE CONSTRUCIED AND ARE N�T � � 8 OBSTRUCTED 8Y PLANTERS, SIDEWAUCS, PAVING OR SIMMR C2 g 2 � �� .� � � CZ INSTALLA110NS. ANY PERMANENT SURFACING StJCH AS SIpEWALKS AND LEGEND ,� � j -� �p �' � ' ASPHALT PAVING SHALL BE CONS1RUCTED WI111 APPROPRIA'TE SWAIF.S TO � ����" � BW BJ4CKOFYVNJC -�- -SS- BANR/1KIr8E11Y6i ���� ��� � � � , \ ACCOMMODA'fE DRAINAGE. � � ^ 295.69 TC A' �, �� .10 FL = i r ��' � 295.19 1P g 5`' � 15, PIPELINES WHICH ARE TO BE ABANDONm SHALI BE REMOVED BY -so- -so- gppqMB�R �� �� 9 �• g'L �p,� �A CONTRACTOR IF 1}iE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER SO REQUIRES. IF � FN�HROOR � � `ti ry �b• 1.5 _ I �`�' � � k ALLOWED TU REMAIN, ALL OPEN ENDS, HOLES� OR OTHER OPENINGS IN -w- -w- W/��L� <a ��.� � I 'T .A �� � B. FG �'� TME PIPELINES 5HALL 6E PLUGGED. 1}iE COST OF PLUGGING 5liALL BE FG FNIBHOItADE � INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE FOR THE GRADING ITEMS. -�- - ��,� � � I �.5 � a ( Ft �,o�wu►� � � � (E) PA110 � 3 �p \ 16. ALL CONIRACTORS ARE TO OBTAIN THEIR RESPECTIVE PERMITS FROM � � • THE AGENqES HAVING JURISDIC'�ON OVER THEIR WORK AND SHALL � �8�� -Q -� �`� �2� � ___- 1 ' 295.25 TC � $� ADVISE THE AGENCY 48 HOURS PRIQR TO STARIING WQRK. �' - -- - - -- --- - � � FG � 294.75 FL . �� GND l3ROlJPD -oH- --ai- 0'1lERHEAD Q W t> 1 B, 3TRUCTION NOTES `����, ����'� �e• � r� � ,� ' . '° � Zes.2 �\ � s/c s�wouracao►fa� a w ��� 'L v i � gP T T� � � F � .'y . , . � $ TC TOP OF OIAi , � �. l�(!l 2 a OONSTRUCT 3TD CITY DRIVEWAY APPROACH � � i .' : e _�' 2 Z UNITA ` w S� C ToC 'roPOF OOMd�tE O I�SANrrAFiYMi C2 s LOT 1� � G .. ?9 S �? p �'� FF 2��dT � 8.4� F �� 1P � oF �►v�xr OO (b7 eT�11� WA7fR SERV{CE BY SAN JOSE WA'IER COA�MIY a UMI�D � � � PAD296�T e � 9� 4.80 FL R + DFPRESS WR8 PER aETaL 4 � � /�p � �'� � � � FL F1.OW I.AiE � CLFJ1NOtJt � ^ 6 . . e '� '7 �L � . •. . . 3 WNSiRUCT (N) MASONRY WALL. MATCH (E� WALL / o = - Q , . . � ., ry F� � � � 2��� (� . .���:, . ',;- .: ��v��rou� C2 � c��o�r > �� � . - � g SEE STRUC7tlRAt. PLANS FOR DETAILS g�O .� • � ` , �' � \ a $��'� �� 265.b7 NV (Ej af7NwNO w�u -8� � � PROVIDE QEfPER FOUPDATtON FOOTNIG ln 298.00 �L � �'� { � �R BTRUCTURA� PuW9 POR oETl1i.8 � (El HOODEO QaE� ACCOMODA'fE LOWER FlNISH GRIIDE AT BAqC OF UNIT. � - HP I ,', , "' � 1 ��j `i `- � ' . � • k ,dP S �? CONCRETE qJlB �.�: � a � REPLACE (E� FENCE CONSTRUCT (N) WI�OD FENCE ON I � ••••, � - �� f ' w \ � � � � ,�� �*�� Ci2 . ��,. � � � � I�TNNiNO WALL (8' 7�0 18' MAX HIOH). SEE STRUC1URHl i � � � i PORC � � G � � � ' • Q ,�' � � � •. . : CONCC� i DUi'1FIi � ? z 0 PLANS FOR DETAILS � 295 � s? F _ � . ..r �o' y � •�� - C2 � �1J Z ,�' I FG 0� � � ORCH ^ 296.42 P \ � \� �� Q \� � '� �� sO � +^ �rq�qr�' , � t�i �: DBCOMP06EDOW1lYiEYlY1LKY111Y �TIi�TOlERBIOM� S � O `b ,�' ��T � 296. 0 T ,� � �;�:t.r��:,.:av � LL UMl C x �' � �� oo . �.."'' � + � 293.9e RNN (E� s� uwosc� �.�►r�e Foao�iu.s (� p � ,' � �' ,� FF 2�9.BD 9g� • � �'�+ ,• °' �� Z86Z7 INV �"' i �\ � �,�� �, � �, \� �;�� �, \ � � P�►n 2�00 � LOT 4 ti �� � �� � � a � s, rF � � � � � + � � � , L - - � � � � • C = T' ' � > . L - � � j �L � � I �� s G '� � 1 '` 'L� 4 �,` � � � � � S 37 2 � 17" E ' ES?1MATED EARTHWORK ��� 7 �� �_ �° h F Trun �rB y �b� v, �,��T� e � � 17.39 cur 3o ctr � � �p^ � ��"��b ��S'�rd ��a � ���_----- � 4� _Blaak Walnu _ � � �� .50 b � � �N , // \ � � � °i k � R �y -�-- - �'�� ------ �^' �'�� � q . � sax 2 �' � 380 CY � 1 �_ 1 . . -- -�----- ----- '� s � � r - -- -�-------- � ( ��� �-- � � \ � � �,� � ��o L�d ti 'a � IMPORT 3S0 CY ske�r � j � � 1 r - L - - --�--- - - -.. _. � � , - , _. r - - - - ��.- � �" - _ � ._. ° - - - � �� 42" W ; 167.83' S � I � .o �.% ��ti. �.� �. . - -- - . �. ' SEE NOTE 19Ae0�VE �.�. z � g� �=,r�• crw} � � � --� b � � '. .��,�\�,�� • ��� ��� � �': ' � >d ►. �' . � . �D� ��M CONCRETE VERTiCAL CURB 1 �vo scuE C2 v�r. uP IA3E, CL2 2 C2 1�4' PVART. LIP (TYP.) CLA33 A PCC PL � CONC VERT CURB � R�yy� (N) WOOD FENCE W/ 12" HIGH RETAINING WALL � CONC CURB 2 SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS I & GUTTER c2 i � e , {E) CONC SOUND WALL I z= � 1 � ,.� .;. _ .,, ' �� (E) GND . ;.� :'�:.' 2.5 AC ON 8.5" CL. 2 AGG. BASE !y I PL 8ECTION A-,A I N0 � ) WOOD FENCE W/ 18" HIGH i :TAINING WALL � E STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS�i CONC VERT CURB �� �e• te� � � . r- ..� - • �;�;� • ' �1i i i���i'. , � . . -. , - VALLEY GUTTER No scauE � � W W c� � a Q z � � � 3 � ❑ � I 3 C2 (E) CONC SOUND WALL � p� � 2.5" AC ON 8.5' CL. 2 AGG. BASE -' I ; (N) WOOD FENCE W/ 18" HIGH SECT�ON B$ � I RETAINING WALL � � 5EE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS Np gC�LL,F W ' ¢ w Q Z J � ; (N) RESIDENT1A� BLDG 4 8" MIN (TYP) (N) SIDEWAIK (N) RESIDENTIAL 8" MiN (TYP) ° N N I . . , . � BLDG 1 I � '� �� ' h .�• ..�,. Y. �.:� ..'. . �. �_ � 1 � �. r ". � � , �� • :. �. : ;�� � ' .•�.' I � ` 1 "•• . ��. \ \ / ♦ / . • � 1• ♦ \ �� �. � � �i I , . DRAINAGE SWALE � • ,� ,� , , •..., - - - - �. � � ` � . ,_ �. i �'� ' _~_ __ - - _ '_ __' z (E)GND� � ---_.._. _____- ---------� -- .�L � i �. ID s .� , . i• 8ECTION GC "o "c�`F 36 �� � �' � ��� � ���� --- __ _.Y f 1� I � � � � � � � I 12 0 � I L_______ ��_^^___�.__....____�___J � BOTTOM OF CURB � 0 N� r V N � O N DEPRE83ED CURB DETAIL 4 'o„ No scA�E C �'„ �n a� � �� 0 � � � �� �� fER Yi ���` u' � ybo � � �a � ��► � 1 ° , ° 7 ���' �� � � � � ^�� � ��� ����i �� � ��� '� N N'B � ��� Z W2 � ��V � > � � g ��o� ���� -� � O a��= � (E) CONC SOUND WALL � �a�� � � C � �� 2 � 2 Sff� DRAWINQ N0. CLASS A ON81TE CONC. CURB AND GUT:"ER No scau.e I I _E� AVENU� I \`` \`` \ \ i ~ � � \```\`` \``\\`` \ `� `�� � . � � �� � `.� � , , ,- � � ��,. . ,- �. � �� , , �,, �,, . �\```` �````\ �` �` 20' wide entry �-- �� � ` � ��� ���� . � �� � � TRACT NO 789 � �� , ��,, �,, . � � �� ��. , . . , . , . � � �� ��, - � , ��. �, ��o '��,, '���, ., � ,,, . � �. . d� , . � rn `. � \ ° ```` ````• i N `�`� �`�� � � � �. �, ., , i `.` � � , _ � �� � �, � � i � � \ i i � I � i \ i � 2 i � I 3 � � � i i � 4 i i � � i I i i I � o � I ° o 30' RADIUS 20' wide drive ``�`. `�� �\. . `\ `� � \ . ` `. � �.� ��` . `��� `� �\� . � \ \� � ��', `,, o � . . o �, �, � N \ `�� � ` i s� �� � � O � � �'s 24' wide aisle 8 Parking Spots . \ `` \ � .� � \` \ .� � `. . . \ �` �`. . �� ` � � ``�� ``� . � . � / �� ``��\� / �/ ^ `���. ``�' —'—� � ' I � i � i LOT 7 f � � i � 0 i Unit D E ° 0 � ��4 ! � � I I I � i 4' Setback �-� � do __��_ o � � o � i ,� � o, 1 �M � .d � o � � LOT 1 � °� � � � I � � � I /# � � � LOT 3 � 0 , o I� i : l `t��.� �. � � e� �, ,. \,� t `?�! \ � `� /� /!�� , `� " ������ � 1 i� �� � I .�. � , ��i � � 'c i:� _� _; , \� f. �� �� � . .�` �`` � LO�, 2�' ;� .� . �`. `. . �� '�, `. . . � `. � .� � *� \� .� �� , / � � Slte Unit 1= 1009 sf x 2 units Unit 2= 972 sf x 2 unit Tota 1= 4 u n its Parking = 8 stalis total 2 stalis / unit o ia� zo� N FIRE DEPT. NOTES 1. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: IN ALL NEW ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS, NOTE: COVERED PORCHES, PATI05, BALCONIES, AND ATTIC SPACES MAY REQUIRE FIRE SPRINKLER COVERAGE. A STATE OF CALIFORNIA LICENSED (C-16) FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMR PLANS, CALCULATIONS, A COMPLETED PERMIT APPLICATION AND APPROPRIATE FEES TO TNIS DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING THQR WORK. CRC SEC. R313.2 AS ADOPTETD AND AMENDED BY CUPMC. 2. POTABLE WATER SUPPLtES SHALL BE PROTKTED FROM CONTAMINA7ION CAUSED BY FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUPPLIES. II' IS T1iE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANTAND ANY CONTRACTOR5 AND SUBCONTRACTORS TO CONTACT THE WATER PURVEYOR SUPPLYING THE SITE OF SUCH PRQJECT, ANO TO COMPLY WITH TFtE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT PURVEYOR. SUCH REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO TI1E DESIGM OF ANY WATER BASED F7RE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND/OR FIRE SUPPRESSION WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OR STORAGE CONTAINERS THAT MAYBE PHYSICALLY CONNECTED IN ANY MANNER TO AN APPL[ANCE CAPABLE OF CAUSING CONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY OF THE PURVEYOR OF RECQRD. FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SYSTEM(S) UNDER CdNSIDERATION WILL NOT BE GRANTED BY THIS 1�.5 Easement OFFICE UNTiL COMPLIANCE WIfH THE REQUIRFMENTS OF THE WATER PURVEYOR OF RECORD ARE ROCUMENTED BY THAT PURVEYOR AS NAVING BEEN MEf BY THE APPLICANT(S). 2007 CRC SEC. 903.3.5 .� AND HEALTH AND SAFfEY CODE 13114.7 ,� � ��.� �� 3. PREMISES INDENTIFICATION: APPROVED NUMBERS `. OR ADDRESSES SHRLL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW AND �`�` �` FJQSTING BUILDINGS IN SUCH A POSIfIQN AS TO BE � PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEFIBLE FROM THE STREET OR �`.� �� �\� ROAD FftONT1NG THE PROPERTY. NUMBERS SHALL `�` `.� � CONTRAST W1T11 THEIR BACKGROUND, CFC SEC. 505 ` `. �` �. � � .``\` �``` ` - __S�mm�n Ar ' '��`, � — � �, � � ��� �. ,, , ��_ ' m ~ \ `� O `� `� � � (� � � \ ` \` . � � ` `\ � x � -- � -� - ;��� g � g � Unit B (� ° � � ` � �;��� � � 3 1� ` ` �, 0 0 � LOT 4 � �_ , � _� �'� � �� i o C o m �'t� o.� A r e a � '� �. �- , \ � � . '� � � _ �\ Architectura! Site Plan V � � _ �' M � M � O ^� L .-� � � OD � � � � °' E- � ' cl � a �� � 0 � V � N P7 �..� o� 0 ' N � o � � 0 � N � � .� 0 .� � �.. 0 ,� � a. u � � � � � �, 3 0 � e z � � .� C � L 0 W "— � � V � ` � C o� L W °' a J � V U � �(Y-A� Second Floor � � 4� 8 lfi �� :� � � � m � � N � � N 0 � N � 2(?'-8" 16'-7 S�' 1Q'-10' Y-10' 3'-G 3'-9` T-T 2 SH � 4036 SL Fti• !14\\;;.`i�. � 00 �--- Pdr. � - / � N � , KItCf19� \ :... ... ........:: � �� c . �,� i ; ... st .�ir. ...: i I — r > �ining � �-0�X� 0�� Livin 9' 'tic13'- " {3) 2 SH g-r e�-r �s r �-� 4'-6' �o r� � � coat � � � a� . � � � � � � � E. � � � Porch I � � � I � s-w� 4'�' First Floor Plan 1 2 Bedrooms 1-1/2 Bath 1,009 sf V C � � M � M +-�1 � � L .1 � � ao � � �' � � � � C C � �� V � 0 � ._ V � f'V M � O '"� O . N ao o � � o �, N 1p � �# � 0 .,.., �► c 0 � � a u c ° u � � � � . 0 � 0 z W � -� V C z L O W ``_ � `� U Q ` 0 c � �-' L w � � _...! � V U Material List: Roof: Composition Roof Walls: Hardie Lap Siding Hardie Shingle Siding Trims: 2X4 Wood Trim Accents: Trim Gable Treatment Section Left Elevation Rear Elevation Plan 1 Exterior Elevations � 41 8' 16, 39 Front Elevation Right Elevation V C � Q K , r� M N � �„� f�'1 �..� 0 [V O '"'� O • ' N L ,-i °� � � o � � �� N � � � � � � � � � � .� � ° c � Q� �. � V � O � V � � 0 � _ � a u c u � �a � � � �3 L 0 a� 0 z W � z W � Q 0 � J U � � � 0 � � V . O c � L � � � V � 9(Y.A■ � a � V C � � M � M ri O ^� L � V � C�D � � 'a' V � � Y O C � � Q � V � O � ._ V n N M ,..� O r "� c ' N 00 O � r-I O � N �p � � .a O .,..,, � � 0 � � � o. u c u � io � � � .� � 0 � 0 z T t Second Floor 0 4` 8' 16' � � 1 40 First Floor Pla n 1 Alt 2 Bedrooms 1-1/2 Bath 1,009 Sf � z w � Q 0 � � U � C � 0 � � V ► 0 c � L � Q. � V Materia! List: Roof: Composition Roof Walls: Hardie Lap Siding Hardie Shingle Siding Trims: 2X4 Wood Trim Accents: Tr�m Gable Treatment Secfiion Left Elevation Rear Elevation Plan 1 Alt Exterior Elevations 0 4' 8' 16' Front Elevation Right Elevation f U C � C]. �, � M �i O N L � � � � �- � � C� °' � Y 0 c � � Q � V � O � CV � N fr'1 .. O `'� 0 ' N 00 � O � � o� N tC � � .� 0 .,._, � � 0 � � a u c 0 v � �o � � � 3 L 0 a� � 0 z W � z W � Q 0 W J U � � 0 � � V . 0 c � � � � � V � � 7T_7 Second Floor 0 4` 8' 16' � � zr-r �-a• w�,o� I — — — — — — ,_......,, ................ ,.�..,�r:.::....::,v ., n �< O O �� pan � SL. GL. DR. TEMP. � �` r � I -- � J � Q Kitchen inin Q Q � � � � N _ � 3� '-6"x1o� • - � , �` ti�cd�t - ��. Living 5'-10'x12'-2 (3) 2 SH 4'-6' 4'-5' g_,o. is�-a. ., :,. � � ' � � � z-a� z-r a�� f-a° 4'�" 8-8' �-s� �-r �� 2T-2' First Floor Pla n 2 2 Bedrooms 1-1/2 Bath 972sf 42 � � � � � tv � fi � � a- � r V C � . �. c�, = M � O ^� L .-� � � m � � '`. V � � Y 0 c '� � d � V � O � V � N M ...� O '"� 0 ' N ao o � � o �, N �O � � � O .,..� � C O � � a u c u � io � � � .� � ui 0 z � � .� C z �— O W "- � � V '� , 0 c o� L W °' a J � V U � Material List: Roof: Composition Roof Walls: Hardie Lap Siding Trims: 2X4 Wood Trim Accents: Trim Gable Treatment Section Left Elevation Rear Elevation Plan 2 Exterior Elevations 0 4' 8' 16` Front Elevation Right Elevation v � � ^ � �i. M I _ � I .--1 O N L ,--1 t� "' � �- � � � °' H Y 0 c � ^, �/ 0. � V � O .�; ._ V n N C�1 �..� O `"� 0 ' N � � O � � o� N �C f � .� Q .,.., �. � 0 � _ � a U C ° u a � � �, � 3 L 0 a� 0 z W � z W � Q 0 � J U � � � 0 � � V � 0 c � L � � � V .EGEND ��1 � IXISTIN� TREE TO BE REMOVED (SEE PLAN FOR TYPE AND SIZE) � � � CONCRETE PAVING / WALFCWAYS O, '� •o'� ° BARK MULCH {FUTURE COMMUNIIY GARDEN OR PLAYAREA) ., t,bt�b .-q �--v WO�D FENCES AND GATES, 6 FEET HtGH V 'RELlMINARY PLANT LIST o�: LL PLANTS 3ifOY.'N fN BOLD lTALICS ARE CAlJFORN/A NATNES ALL OTNER PLANTS ARE NATURAL/ZED ND LQW WATER-USF PLAIYTS. :EY BOTANICAUCOMMON NAME SIZE REES: p ACER MACROPHYLLUM (BlGLEAF MAPL� 24' BOX LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS (BRISBANE BOX) 15 GAL. PYRUS CALLERYANA'ARISTOCRAT' (ARISTOCRAT PEAR) 24' BOX HRUBS & GROUND COVER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS WA-!lRSI (BEARBERRI� 1 GAL. ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'HOWARD MCM/NN' (MANZANITA) 5 GAL ARMEf2lA MARITIMA (SEA THRIF'T) � Gq�„ C,4RDCBARBERAE (SANTA BARBARA SEDQEJ 1 fs',qL, CISTUS CRISPUS (ROCI�tOSE) 1 GAL. FESTUCA GL4I/CA (COMMON BLUE FES4'UL� 1 QqL, GAZANIA HYBRID (CLUMPING GAZANIA-WHITE) 1 GAL. MYRJCA CAUFORNICA (PAC/FlC WAX 1NYRTLE� 5 GAL. PHORMUIM HYBRID'DAZZLER' (HYBRID FLAXj 5 GAL. SALVIA LEUCOPHYLLA (PURPLE SAGE) 5 GAL. �OTES WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE.ORDINANCE: THE 1RRIGATION /WD PLANTING DE51GN FOR TNIS PROJECT WILL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNiA "WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE". TOPSOIL ! HORTICULTURAL 301L3 TESTS: ALL PLANTiNG AREAS SHALL RECENE A MINIMUM 6" LAYER OF NON-COMPACTED TOPSOIL. HORTICULTURAL SOILS TESTING WILL BE PERF�RMED PRIOR T� PREPARATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND WILL BE INCORPORATED tNTO THE "LANDSCAPE 501L PREPARATION" SPECIFICATION AND WILL INCLUDE RECOMMENOATIONS FOR TOPSOIL AND AMENDMENT AND FERTILIZER (NCORPORATiON. TURF AREAS: TURF AREA WILL NOT EXCEED 25% flF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA OR 1,250 SF. ALL PORTIONS OF TURF AREAS ARE WIDER THAN B FEET. TURF IS LIMITED TO SL�PES THAT DO NOT EXCEED15%. NCN-TURF AREA3: AT LEAST 80°� OF THE NON-TURF AREAS SHALL CONSIST OF NATIVE OR LOW-WATER USE PLANTS. HYDROZONE3: PLANTS WITH S�MILAR WATER NEEDS ARE GROUPED WITHIN HYDROZONES. EACH HYDR�ZONE SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY A SEPARATE VALVE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM: SYSTEM SHALL BE DE5IGNED AND MAINTAINED T� MINIMIZE WATER WASTE. LOW-VOLUME IRRIGATION SHALL 8E UTILIZEO IN NON-TURF AREAS. IRRIGATION SFIALL ONLY OCCUR BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 PM AND 10:00 AM. RECYCLED BARK MULCH: ALL PLANTING AREAS WILL REGEIVE A MINIMUM 2' LAYER OF RECYCLED BARK MULCH. 'REE REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT tEES TO BE REMOVED: \ / (N) WATER METERS, SEE CIVIL DRWG'S. (N) RETAINING WALL SEE CIViL DRWG'S. FLOWER[NG ACCENT TREES LANDSCAPE 3CREEN FOR 3ECOND FLOOR WINDOW3 44 WATER BUDGET ESTIMATE MAWA: Ma�cimum Applled Water Allowance (galJyear�: (49.4') (0.62) ((0.7 x 2,450 LA} +(0.3 x 0 SLA) }=52,527 galJyear (49.4`) (0.82) �0.3 x 2,4b0 LA) + 0 SLA) = 3Z�158 gaiJyear 0.70 NOTES: 1. Bay-Frlendly Landscape Guidelines: All frrigatlon deslgn and plant selecfions will be in confortnance with the 'Bay-Friendly Lendscape Guidelines. 2. Pervious and Impervious Calculatlons: See Civil Engineers drawings. �'$ -- •. ... ... `,': L�'�'b �`.; •\ � � COMMUNITY GARDENI.. '' �p � ` PLAY AREA � • -'� �'$ �'� .� b � � .� ` �; �;.:,:. � '.�,�„ � , .;�p+� .i y�,, `` ` ��` � �.�=�'L �� ►6 � o� a �`�'�b�� �: � 1�'��, ----------- �------- {E) CONC. PANEL WALL �� � � � � . . . . � � � �� � � �� � a ° . W ,� � � � ��_��� �� �� � a z } � �J � a W � a � V Z V � �o � � � J z �w � U � � � Z = Q = � a �wa J � U ¢ V U z ~ Q = orUw� BL c►�c� JC oA� b/18111 BGY.E AS NOTEp Jo9 Na 1D.004 f lva:��.! tiq:• t' ' Nu'^V rovk : ... �-� ^. .r\�. ,: 'T �V' �vH11M ? t' ♦ �'vn' v .� . ':WrWA�/.11�WMn N . .`... . M�.sNwl�'VS ••••. q wk�u.� arMY t �••�• n•.�Tr� .�.w4a:•usiG!:r'.-u � : ,• uqf • �.v Y.n 1!! i �:: •:r���Ywh•SV•. t!4W��lNV v . ..:'rv.MA•l"� �:-Nn_r.i:e� ' k:::Y•�•�v?Q '•.vh.ki r. ..w... �-u wSK.:' .. . ........... ........ ..... .. ....... .....S�N4 j ... .... . .......... ..... . ...... ... � 1A�V.'w�>Ia�)+J • w�W\v.. ~ C .�.n a�r+h•i�w.r4iNn a•��v.'r4�m.i� V'LO'MU�M'dtr•] �. ' ��:t\•\`:I,•.��.. .�Tn� iN �..:ta�.�n�r}+y�+ ................. •��Iar.'l Yt�t 1i;„. �.. .. �� .�r�^....,.. . v�: a .. ...,<. .,,.. �� .+� .. . .. . ... ......... ��.usr �rwa�n� M ♦'.t�� +rs ��:� ..y ir��u+^i� . . . . .. ..... r .n.. .. . .:Ty; ?:k5�h!:�:C!�:i..... .................................... :t�9 Y l % . . . . w � 1R\ �•vh LTC'rYVfM.Mi.a .• • ve= Yrv�n /4��v . ... ... .... .. ... ........... .:,,. t.. ., o ....,•.. . n g; .M ar..s r 1/ I aA`W s �:lrvti�wv. ai�r.q .. ...... .. . . ........ ............. 45 s rxsex�fica�t #7dis.sxi C��r:ikist Sir,g:N f�r.rik �� �s:+�.«.w,.v.a..�•.w...vn..,.,w.v..�. •..v�.�:raM .......... ......� +?F 4W+tlatl:tlMM�l.\44q1•Ii1W4WAbfd�lfMhNV�MM `kDfll'Ml�bwel ri�:�A�Yi�::�:?:�n4 .r�tiJLwi�n4A�iWYx�v �itl�•:.r..ifAr:nirnyKVwu.uY ... .. .. ..... u V•.b•M': w X�'IVi✓I � VvuvNn•Y �..ta.. 7 M ]MV4Mt O[Na.Y%fS. �.'YGv!' OY '?:11� .' Vw�Y �Iv 1'�) �wp. Fa�.\ F RwNW) 4 v�M. WS\ � f. {( � IA'M�i 5�. _1Y�1 'u i 1N4vJ���f'l . e +. a �-xr �a � e)+6a�.t .. Y 4n�+s��.� h.�WN 4�•M SwtiS••� ...w+� wo4 4 �•. ��:i }:� ow! M.i1 TnM'iM ��v 1wV�rq�nWwN! . .� . , ::: > :� ' ?;:f::•�� � , L � � , ' � - ::r; ;�:/:;: ::'iiiiia;r:fi:;% - �.1��.���+ ..C'i . `�2"tii:::;:::f:`r:;:..,•.t:< .:3:;'::.......,...... . .... .... ... ' . . ... ... ............. .> .... ............ - :.�::.� .,.;•:t•"�>»v' •: .+w:l":i` - . .. . .. .............. . o. �r+�4�th�..wi�ni�: ��� '"•::-'..,........; .""' � ' :?i: ,y.��,..x.aw,..i.vw. :... �.:. ; ..._.. . - .... . ..............._......... � .•.n.�w.wr....e�u•.u�vn.�.w.v.�. ;... .., .... . _ _ .... ............"""'_"'_" 1G'� . ......................:.�.:.:...:........:" ' '.:. �z,':�v"iK'w" �wi w"�+ZM�!" IV.^V^r:ai!%f.l�CC .................. ..••••-.....:... ........--- :-: . _::::::::::. :::::::::: «n �«.,rw.. S -- - � _.�� •Yh•�C!tOY.JK�'+.K�.fn t� .�t�.+r..i: . •._ ,_... ..' ...................... •f.�n^Fl\in•AHfi�Y ) 4M ... .. i- • :'•�...�... j . M1 .. . .. ...............'" ".. V.��.lA� :nf.H'AnfN�r�{�Y - .. ... ..... .] ... ......................... � dMi�L�: �FW/JVYI.�. e .................. ... ..... . . . ..1........... .. '•_............_.......... �Ak��Y• .•.�.. .'f.ti .iYuriii: . . .. ..... . ......"'. .... _.............'.......... ..iYildi:��:i:;•'r."x%:::�5' %;=:;:;:'•�=":: %' - :':.cs:v , . ........ • ' """ " •" : ...: �. � �. �. � - ......................:.. .... • -"-'-"-"'-' '-'-' ,... -"""'-""... C d.�,•,lr.acry,.:'�>%r-:::�:i:�f-'•;;i>;;:_,5,;_: yy;;;:':;y;:y;.�;. ................ ..............::_.�:::::::::.�cy•.._.:;_......,..+ ... �hbn�vMh��1.��w�%nMM1'•NINVM ::.""""' ......:............ ...................... . ....:.... ....:.-.....r. :�0� s�.Mr.ltirv . � .... ....................._... �.ar' : ..�i::.a.. i �• .,� ; . ;... ;. . ..i .... ........_................. a ... . , .ia;Y:v+�w:irv::r..i.w.:rw..2ttu.w�..�:� ��...� _... f ' .. ...........""'.......... ""....... _.. .... """' ............... ................................ � .....__:......_. . ....._......""""""' � _. : ", '. � �.... �.wwi'.�.��wiwfM�•nnV.M�.�un�e �.�.. ..� ................... . . .. ♦ i .� ��I�ii�a'VyViwY�R�W� ........ .. .. . . ........ ...�. ..... ...... .... ...�...................... f a]C� IMXS )T(1 .} .titify' HX IP ' t ••••••••••••••.. .•••• � . M . .. ' �� . . I"� . M1 Ia! � Y / IN'a F 4 L ' . . .. '""_....."'"".. . . . .. . . . {.. . .-.�.,....... f ' 1 �t 4 � 1 � .....y.�:::t:.... t �(���� ..."" f...+3?�!h<C{J�['Jr� ........... ��YwTPg!- ....r. .:.. ...�...' . ...... .......x: :-:n: 4........ ......f ... ....... I4u+N1aWL\�V4.YxI. 'A �l �+.1.3. � , . . .. f �..."'"" ............................ ...� ....... .. y f� � Y' rM . ... . � . � .:........ ............................ �i . : �11� - M.\ M'�+i�M' N.4'f!M�.�: ; - ' _.�__'."____' ...�.i ........ ...... . .. .......'...."... `'� ti:YTf.'{t�S�l.ivwi.�.7\INIn ..................... �:�.�.. ......... ...:...{.� .�....... ............................ : Y'.�N�-.n��arr��,e�L 1 i ♦ti:�w.•::�wcsv. .•••. •. .• � {.. .., vr�.w...w.'ww- .w.w�rz•wn. { . � ... �. . �. F �w. ti a:.,..Y.�....�.w.., .. ! .. . . . . .. . . � . ......•.�.,�H..•H, :. . . .. � � ........."' ......... ....................... ..+w r... .. ..........._.............." """"... �� .... ......... . ""'.. .. a.rh Y'w;4�n'l*�+rw •.. �`. ... . ...............................�..._.......... . ....4'�wnHiiiu:liiy�'viGi'.w."" �:.:� ..................... ' . .... .......................... ♦Nav�•n•.q.M�..e11.�.nww�.�.rir. • ; . � .. _ .... ....................... . . ...� .._...�... ..� ...., � ' � . ....� :�:}. � : :..:....... ... . A • .. .v � ♦':�.�n4N41w.1•�.�.�.4w• . � . .. . : _ __ .... ................__.'.._... .. ...........�.........�.�.._� ...............�......��.�.�.�..:�c..:�..:....j�.�:��....n ..� .�.�............�... .. . �Flw.w�vw�n�)THYUY�l10M1!uYY � �.1'.: . � . ; •• • '�M(� Y%����vA1►MVw�nWi:•'wM�l�+�w.w�VAwnM+wM.�.. ....-�... n .... �...... ... .� ..................�.... . �:i. . . ......... ......... .... .......... .. .....�:�:�....�........;•.....:. J4.� ]KMfb1�JIYMp/C�GrWN�Y-f�(F}Mi01U16�HUMi :� � . � ^•� •••. ••••••••••••••••�•••••••• ��_ ....... ..._ ..._ ...._..........-•--- - :Et......�:VC!ii=_ti4�i0tir':u;i4.aiefriil.�.�v:.!!.�..........::::;:�•.''"""' . ;..F.:.� . .... . .......1�:':':'::4'!'�R^:r:i`�:t::�R,.: ...... .: ..... .-•- ---'--�--................ ... .......... ... . .. .. ... .. .. ............... ... ' : . . . ?*.��:�CG}(�.AO:k�a�xu»TticM2>:': :"::::.:::::: :•:: ::•:... .. . ,..., ;•-_tr•`z:;{;'•>;::r.r�::. �. . � -. , _,r.-:.... � . ........r.... s.,r:r::::.:.: "'-::._. . .;:> z twi4+.J 'i:iY�.wr .. ... .. ...... .... ... ...... f Yf.�� CS.Jl.4 !7.w•alsf� ••.• •••••• • :••}•• tr �.::.::..i.. .. '� ..�.:...:�.��"'� '� �. � ..... '"'.:...�.' '"" " ' .......'..'�........... M 4nA��4.1YAVrJnlr�v •��. � . <• "'"".........""'_'__"' . _ ltlKtnN1!'M\.:n��vY.r� . . .�.... .. . �... . ....i.�.....�....a.....� . .............. S ." .......�....... .... ..............................................v�_.........v.....:...... ... � ._.....�....i........ � ....................._._..... .,... �cu w..:;w�e � ' � � � .. .. � Nv.1••iVw\ _ ' ; ',': _ _.. .. .........__'____.... . . .. .... . :. ... . .. . �. �:::.�....�...:...��. �� � �liN���.�+w'.v>c �.. ., . . . .... ... .......................... "" ""'� ""'""".�. �.. . . y...,...","'"'__' : ........ ...:.._:.._.....:........ . . w .�...us.'...v.v. �. . ....._..--• ............... .}- �:u�vva..• y... .�.. . ... .......................... .. •"". •' " Yc� ��w..rw..u<�ac.wr,:ww �..... . ..., . ,....;.""""" "' ........ ............. . � � r `. � � ��...,:.va�a�w�• . . ,....., " . ....................... '::}: .�d40}iVR.lC'!tLN�ViY�R.:Y...... ......... ": . � .... ......................... . . : . . .. . � ....�.. .. Ir��c[ iti ..•. . • Of . �. �1' }! .. ! . � ' 1 >M+�J • ` � llv l �t�c . .... { . . .. __" ... ............... � P N�/w1�YnL����wrY+I.wawy . , � 1 � � � - � . .�n.... ..:::.. .. . ..::._ ....:.... :.. h:� .....................................................n...�.............�.�....... .....Z.�................. ............................ ih�� nlMwYw�4Nwv�ru�h�wV �.'. ': _.__ 1Y•r.rN+u.Y.%ra.r:?1�.•�WU`.v.Wrl:FEx�� : ...: '.Of:l � •.i' NNI.M�N\��f w r .., ..�. ............. ....�. ... .........................� . t ^N �..N �: < ......:..... . � ..:...y...:.. ..., •w.:�w�� � ' , i.:.�.�. : .. '`.K: .....�tx:....:,�:^7......... ;. ., . : ;.: ..... __ ... .......................... .. "::...... ........ ..................:::s......_.:.:........... . ,.:. .:...;.. .... ......................... .. , www+�c..�.rn...�w.�,o.s.�..ewwl�..vw .. ,� H �� A�tulkqwxY.w�o. Ta�.n .... .. : . i. . + _ ,....:..:.�.., � '.,tr>eq�y+n.�o.rsr ��.rwwaw'M9 . ... . ' . �. � .... . .... .................... . . ....... . ... . ......... ... ...... . .. . . _.. ..... �... ...;--..� .. .. ... ... .."""........... :;j�.; U �' .\ � � . .......... . ........ ... . "'""""'"'"... . ...�. 1 14�� wJ�w� " .... ...............' ""'".... ' ................. : .. _ K INV�1yRa�WV. - � : '',' .. ..... .......�'.'___.__... .... ..'.'�.. '. ..�. .....i.. ... a ()•aML�WnMi\wv.•:n'.��+i• t . • , � . ♦ . +K.:+�w�.1+•H+� �.. _'" '"' .:........ ... •y.......:... }....... ............._......."'"' � .................................�::wVU.��w'�R���:+t�/F�Y' ..w...�.:.:.....�....... _�.i-....�:.: 1�►e.l� � .... . r..v. ; • N:�W.IY+.'w'•r Y .nv.�A���s.a; : .nA. �.++lvsF ' .... . . . . ... .......... ... .... . .�. . : �. � A4�wrk<V�w9..... �+w.�.w..mrow.�..�r ^i :� �+.' . : ... ' '""� � ' '" ' " ' '� " "" ..:. . �. �� � "'" ���� .... . ......... ." ". .�...... " _ " """": .�:: - I Xx. GWnNY.t i�4 •�n 1t[iY�✓:.:.. -.: �: . f,• � ..a....vN . . '. . ... ....._"" + 0 . 1 W.v�e+t�k.4N.M12.lFbLn/a���Y14MWIH��IM4{4� �.- , nar. .�v r..�.r.�..�,...��r.v.�JV.a •J'4.v.+ . ..... :. ..... �. .,. : - 4. {Fr;nr,..,.,.. ; ............"' �"�""' �"•� ..................�-�---...: ............................: V C � ti � M � � ,-�t O N L., +-�t � � � � � � � � � f�s 0 � � /�� W � � �� O � ' � , -� ,'� n N M H a � 4 . ry � M Q W � � � N � �' � a • �1 � C O � � ;� a a� V C O I V I �' � � C71 � � W Q Z � � L 0 `� a V U . 0 c � � a,� c� a V OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CUPERTINO CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 -3255 (408) 777 -3308 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • hlanning @cuperttino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 4 Agenda Date: June 14, 2011 Application: U- 2011 -06 Applicant /Owner: Kenneth Frangadakis Location: 10601 South De Anza Boulevard (APN 359 -18 -043 and 359 -18 -045) APPLICATION SUMMARY: Use Permit (U- 2011 -06) to allow up to 50 percent office uses where 25 percent is allowed at an existing commercial center in a P(CG) zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Approve the Use Permit (U- 2011 -06) in accordance with the draft resolution. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation Commercial/ Residential Conceptual Plan South De Anza Boulevard Zoning Designation P (CG)- Planned Development with General Commercial uses Environmental Assessment Categorically Exempt Lot Size 71,874 square feet of combined parcels (1.65 acres) Existing Building Area 17,030 square feet Proposed Building Area None Existing Parking Stalls 88 Required Parking Stalls 71 (83 spaces if 50% medical office; 74 spaces if 50% professional office) BACKGROUND: Existing Site and Snrronndinc Uses The project site (De Anza Professional Center) is located on the west side of South De Anza Boulevard and north of Kirwin Lane. The site consists of two parcels connected through a shared parking easement. The larger parcel fronts De Anza (APN 359 -18 -043) and contains two buildings - a 12,730 square foot U- shaped building and a 4,300 square foot rectangular building. The smaller parcel fronts Kirwin (APN 359 -18 -045) and contains an overflow parking lot. The surrounding land uses to the north include the De Anza Plaza shopping center and single - family housing; to the south a commercial building; to the west single - family housing; and across the street to the east, the De Anza Center. ., U- 2011 -06 De Anza Professional Center Use Permit General Commercial Allowed Uses The buildings onsite were constructed during the 1960s and 1970s for general commercial/ office uses. Prior to 1992, professional, general, and administrative offices were permitted in the CG (General Commercial) zone without any specific restrictions. In 1992, the General Commercial Ordinance was amended (Ordinance no. 1601) to restrict professional, general, and administrative offices to comprise not more than 10% of the tenant spaces in a shopping center. The ordinance was amended again in 1995 (Ordinance no. 1687) to limit office uses to not more than 25% of the space in a shopping center. The site has been used for office, commercial and tutoring/ specialized educational uses in accordance with the General Commercial Ordinance at the time of the original approval. The applicant would like to lease space to additional office tenants. The new request requires a Use Permit in order to allow office uses exceeding 25% per the current General Commercial Ordinance. Staff would like to note that there were two previous use permit approvals -- 5 -U -85, for a 6,600 square foot second floor addition; and 48 -U -85, for a new 5,000 square foot office building on the site (see Attachments 2 and 3). However, the projects were never built and the permits expired. DISCUSSION: Office Use The applicant is requesting for a Use Permit approval to allow for up to 50% of the spaces in the center to be office. Office uses would consist of administrative / executive, professional, and medical office uses defined in the City's zoning definitions. No physical building or site modifications are proposed. Parking A parking analysis has been conducted and confirms that currently there is a surplus of 14 stalls onsite (see Attachment 4). A condition has been added to require the applicant to work with staff to keep an active parking account for the center in order to ensure that the tenant mix is consistent with the City's parking requirements. A detailed parking analysis must be submitted for review and approval every time a new change of use business license permit is requested. 47 U- 2011 -06 De Anza Professional Center Use Permit STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The project was originally designed to house mostly professional offices consistent with the original General Commercial Ordinance. However, the spaces in the front could work as active commercial space. Therefore, recognizing the original situation as well as the intent of the current General Commercial ordinance, which supports retail, staff supports the applicant's request with the following condition: Commercial Uses along De Anza Frontage In keeping with Council's interest in focusing active commercial uses along the street, a condition has been added to require the three tenant spaces that front onto De Anza Boulevard (out of the 18 total tenant spaces in the center) be preserved as active commercial uses. There is currently a financial consulting business, tailoring shop, and a law office in these spaces. Out of these three, the law office doesn't meet the description of "active commercial use." However, the condition does not require any changes until the space is re- leased. When the space is re- leased, active commercial uses including banks, insurance /real estate agencies, travel agencies, etc. would be allowed. Staff believes that this provides a balance between the City's interests in maintaining active uses along the street with the applicant's interests in leasing his tenant spaces. INTERAGENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Other Departments' Review The City's Public Works Department, Building Division, and the Santa Clara County Fire Department reviewed the project and have no objections. Environmental Assessment The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15301 (Existing facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Prepared by: George Schroeder, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: /s /Gary Chao Gary Chao City Planner Approved by: /s /Aarti Shrivastava Aarti Shrivastava Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Use Permit 5 -U -85 3. Use Permit 48 -U -85 4. Current parking analysis 5. Plan Set EN ATTACHMENT U- 2011 -06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW UP TO 50% OFFICE USES WHERE 25% IS ALLOWED AT AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER IN A P(CG) ZONE LOCATED AT 10601 SOUTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U- 2011 -06 Applicant/ property owner: Kenneth Frangadakis Location: 10601 South De Anza Boulevard (APN: 359 -18 -043 and 359 -18 -045) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR USE PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the City's zoning ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof, the application for a Use Permit, Application no. U- 2011 -06 is hereby approved, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. U- 2011 -06 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. .• Resolution No. U- 2011 -06 May 24, 2011 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS This approval is based on Exhibits titled, "De Anza Professional Center, 10601 De Anza Professional Center," prepared by Fazekas Architecture, dated 12 -19 -1985 consisting of page Al, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. USE APPROVAL Approval is hereby granted to allow up to 50 percent office uses, provided that the parking demand of the uses onsite (according to the City's ratios) do not exceed the parking supply. Permitted uses include those defined in the City's zoning definitions as "administrative or executive offices," "professional offices," and "medical offices." The tenant spaces along the building frontage (suite #'s 107 -108, 208, and 209) shall only consist of active commercial uses permitted in the General Commercial Ordinance, including, but not limited to retail businesses; restaurants; banks and financial institutions; insurance, travel, and insurance agencies; photography and similar studios which directly serve the public; laundry facilities; limited repair services; personal service establishments; specialty food stores; and pet shop and pet services. Any other uses not listed may be considered by the Director of Community Development at his or her discretion. 3. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT The property owner shall obtain a lot line adjustment with the City to merge the southern parking lot parcel on Kirwin Lane (APN 359 -18 -045) with the main building parcel (APN 359 -18 -043). 4. SITE IMPROVEMENTS The property owner shall apply for the proper City permits for the following site improvements: a. Screen rooftop mechanical equipment from public view. b. Install street tree in the empty tree well in front of the building. c. Resurface and restripe the parking lot on parcel 359 -18 -045. 5. PARKING ANALYSIS AND BUSINESS LICENSES The property owner and /or his representative shall keep an active parking account for the center in order to ensure that the tenant mix is consistent with the City's parking requirements. A detailed parking analysis must be submitted for review and approval every time a new change of use business license permit is requested. Said analysis must be kept up -to -date with the property manager and be made available to any tenants when applying for a business license with the cit All businesses onsite shall obtain City business licenses and licensing from the appropriate State licensing agencies. 6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 50 Resolution No. U- 2011 -06 May 24, 2011 7. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Director of Community Development Planning Commission 51 52 S C f iT; FQOTAGE This Use Permit includes a p pro va l to add app roximat e ly 6,600 sq. rt. to a property with 17,000 nq• ft. or existing gross building space. . It is recognized and approved for the addition to- ekeced:'a.:33 Floor Area i Ratio by .approximately 300. sq t.: 1 FUTURE INGRESS/OGRESS EASEMENTS The applicant shall sigh an agrieement to participa i a rac pro�a:l access easeneni: with the, ad jc f n i:ng property owners) when said prorjr£y owner(s) are obligated to participate ,in a similer agreement. 2o. CONSOLIDATE PARCELS The applicant shall merge all exiating parcels into a siingle lot. � 1. PA itKING Larking shall, be,`prcv3ded at A,ratio of ::One space :ar , every 28S sq., rt of gross floor area.: 22. MIGHT `iie . height , ,or, the addition shall not oxcee ' 6 ft ±: as . measerred from, average.finished. grade to' the i heat po,i,rit, of the atruoture 230 Plan .TMPItOVLMizNTS, :. Th6 applicant shall be requi red'.. to` dedicate ad i.t `oral rlght,',_; r -way. t�lung D$'Anna ouievard and relocate` existing public improvements per the approval of the Itireetor of P =sb] Q. Works.: 24'. PARKi9G Lot T.he applicant .shall be. requi€ ed .`to repair 4p overlay the. existing parking lot ar the :ap"peoval or the Director of Public Works. 25a SIGNING The. sign shown on Exhibit A let Rovis on is not Included in'this ap roval 53 26.. THE P PR OT ECTI ON . The existing tree located in the cvur[. of the main building may be removed,. however-; the applicant" shall provide ;a plan for thee preservation of the remaining J specimen trees on the s ubject propert Said plan shall, I include graphic'de;)lctlon of Protection. devices to bc: insts along the dripline perimeter` of each tree for the duration. of co nst r ucti on act iv ities.: The plan shall include an .'eva,lmatl on "from a Land' seape: Arch i Gee t :,. outlArking effect of con s true ion `.;ac civity upon` the trees and" detaili.ng measures to ensure` their survival in aacordanee with .Ordinance 776. 27. uOUND WALL . A six foot ma:;onry wall. shall be constructed at° the following locations. Along" the westerly 120 .M." "oJR. the" soul }i" property litle`� adjacent =to' ".ared caest; of parking spaces 14 thru.22 ". ." Along tkie" entire northerly: prope r L;. line' «.. — AIo:ng "the west " proper tyy "' li.nc betwee the north, rind" of�" Ruildi!ng .nli+ ano. Lha . no rth property" In addition,: an acous "iJcal."wall construct "0d,.of wood shall be requz,ed'alang the `easterly "` .0 rt. : 'or the north property line TR ASH ENCLOSURE The exts trash ene osure" shall be relocated a.ray Fran th' ad 'pining residential properties, subject to , : ";: the approval or' the;" Di rector, oP "Platin: q "arid E3evelopment":;. " 2�.. Pnl "V11CY" CONTROLS I'he, applicant" shall install, >'.sub,j.ect to; approval . of "? "P1anning `the Director'of. and';'D eve lopmant, lay iscapi.ng ",; ig. ng, "arid " /or :tie"sigr: conLr A: to'' prevent privacy" intrustoti upon" the "re sideriti;,aI ,properties adjoining . ... subdeot: i?re e -ty to " n ©rt}i and south :. Dsgn solutions msav include, but .are not limited "t "a the el;iminatidti''bf 'windows or the insti tTiatr on .of. fixed louvere ar "wing walls. To provide immediate'.' privacy" protoet on, 24 inch box specimen trees may .tie required"., -3- 54 30. LANDSCAPE REVIEW '.he applicant shall reLurn to the Architectueal, and Site � Appro Committ " for i:nror'mal t`cvi wr of 1ar►iscaE's� planting and irrigation plana.: 'Pile landscape p:lar shaII.. a Include th following elements Perimeter landsca stall be rcgared ,along. the north and south property lines'. Along.` the north prop_, line, a minimum 2.5:ft. landscape: strip and trellis shall be required. _ Parking: stalls 1 and l srtatl be converted to: andsenping. , Additional parking stalls may be converted to landscaping, Arovi ft3 the . .. applicant 'still meeta the .C"i'ty, ks parlcing ry '% In order to :co�dliertstate for the 1003 o" t e" existing specimen Pine tree in the courtyard .: cif" the min "i ng, . a ?4 inch box specimen tree may be :required in the front landspape" area Th "e .aPplaan't shall b0" . requir� toz , provilo . irrigation throughout , the sitie, if`it c ©es :not Alreacl:y. exist. . nll rie�a; landeaped' areas shalt be. :1rrigated' _ Existing land scaping slut " ll be t �pldcod w ore it is.sparse in poor condition,. 31. NiC1 DlFZCATION OR: tjit APPROVE13 DL EL PLAN .. In the event that; thu applicant or Subsequent pr operi.y owner shall desire" to make" any minor atange, alteration:' o;r amendment in the agpro`irel dcvelopmont Plan or building permit,.' a- tirri ttert . request arid:` revised development plan or building. permit 3ksail. be; submitted . to the Director" of Plann36g.:tnd Devolapment.; If' the Direa�.or matCes. a> finding that the chanF'es. are minor and do not a ffect the 'general appearance or ' tie area or the intarests o�' dwners" oi' Property withi.ri: or ad,joinzng the ,.ve Omen t"area, the Dire.c:tor may certify the. change: on the revised plan. If:. approval. is:witlihold, the Applicant. inay appeal: to the, Planning Commission . ', If tine changes are material, the t}ireet:or shall submit said changes"to the Planning "'Commission. for approval.', If the chango is denied by tile" Planning. Comit<iss3 on, tht�: applicant. tnalr appeal. to the City.COu as. provided in Clydinanc F►52 o:f the City of Cupertino. If' the. change. is approved, an' appeal my be made by an interet3ted sarty<iirtter' any member•" of the City Council inay 55 ,. ' Coun c-�'l p - said request approval, when the change has been approved by tile. 01 w aftment or Pia I ph VeloPment tb Ra 2043 sily ATTACHMENT 3 ON of C 10100 Torre Nvenue ?.a. dolt 580 Cupertino. California 95014 Cupertino, California 95815 Telephone! (408) 1'2 -4505 OFFICE 01= THE CITY CLERK February 19, 1985 Barry Swensoir1, B il dOX 701 N. First St., #200 San Jose, CA 95112 CITY COI NCIL AC TCti - AP'PLICATIMS 29-M i--85 AND 48 -4j-85p BAIRRY SWENSON RESOLUTION NO, 2756 OF' THE PUNNING CX StnSSION OF THE CITY OF CLIP MM RECCUMMOG APPFCM OF A USE PEF; I= TO (WS`MCT A 5, 000 SQ. F3', OFFICE SING AND RF"LL . swu p.) EX13TI G SnELE SZnRY OMC:E BUI LDIR S Application Nv(s). 49 -U -85 Applicant: 1a rry Swensan Bui ldera Prop3rty owrer Dr. Kenneth =XMd&L — Location: T South of M C.I e] an F84ad Parcel Area (Acres): submitted: is FINDINGS Arri SUBOMCLUSIONS ; Approval i su bj ec t to the fndirg.ts as set forth . on Parma 1 and the sutxx=lusiope as sat forth in the minutes of the planning a mmtissi:on meeting of January 27, 1986. CONDITIONS: standard motions to the "tent that they do not rxflict with the special. cx it is ns ernmerated herein. In the event a conifl i ct does exist., the special conditions as emm*xated herain shall apply. 16. E3CHIB . That t1w motion of approval is based on Exhibits A, B 8-1; E�-2 B-3, B--4 and C of Application 484J-85 except; as may be amended by. special conditions ern.merated herein. 17. A P,ID USES Thi use permit authorizes only , office ,, activity as such uses area referenced in the City of Cupertino Administrative and. Professional office zone (ordinance 002 (y)) . Research and davelcrpment activity as definers in the General. Plan is included as an allured use. Cwmercial uses are spedifically preauded since the project's FAR exceeds: the maxir+�'� .25 limi..t gibed for ==ercial uses in Oarrlition 18 of the South de ju= BmIervard dual. Plan. Ekhibits A and C shall be revised prior to application for building permits to reflect" c caplianc a with the "Wng -Term sidewalk Desig l diagram which appears on Figure 1 of the South De Anca Boulevard Conceptual plan, rihe applicant shall reed pedestrimi and public ut:i: ity its as recess to impleme-- t the afor aid sidewalk / larxl~scapirq configuration. Said sidewalk design All be subject to approval by the Director of Public Works prior: to issuance of building permits. Said pedestrian and public utility easements shall be subject to review by the City Attorney prior to their recordation which shall precede building permit authorization: 16J RE-GO WTION No. 2)b6 (46-U-85) U-13-86 Page 19. Friar or to iw=)oe of kxLUding permits, the applicant/aAmer shall reoord a parcel map which oonsolidates all existing lots into a single entity. The applicant shall record an agreement to participate in reciprocal access easements with the adjoining property owner(s) to the north and south to be implemented utum said prqxrty awner(s) are obligated to participate in similar agreements. MMOR - prior , to sLamosion of application materials for Wilding permits, the applicants' shall appear informally befo the Architectural and Site Approval Ommittes (ASAC) for approval of the following design aspects of the devel . cpment approved under this use Parmit: a) PrWision ' of definitive on-site lighting spoeifications for pedestrian arm .and the parking lot, with appropriate adjurtments to prevent off-site glare. b) Prtmision o%° adequate screening of existing roof- Granted recbanical equipmpt on Building B from visbility to adjoining residential prcpe-Vla ga. c) specific definition of the project colon. /materials palette. d) atmrK�d n- treatmnt of the. Easterly elevation of Wilding A a&Jacent to De Anza Boulevnxd such as a trellised arbor or similar feature. 59 RE50UMON No. 2756 X48- tti -85) 01--ij -8 Page - 3 - .1 10601 S De Anza Blvd- De Anza Professional Center ATTACHMENT 4 updated 5/18/11 Suite Businesses Type of use S.F. Max. # of users Max. # of Employees Parking Requirement Parking Required 101 ISarvaguna Learning Ctr Specialized School 1,056 12 4 1/4 students + 1/1 staff or 1/250 s.f., whichever is greater 7.00 103 Sunny Acupuncture Medical Office 800 N/A N/A 1/175 s.f. 4.57 104 Koski Photography General Commercial 600 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 2.40 105 jArt of Living Yoga Studio Specialized School 1,000 2 1 students + statt or 1/250 s.f., whichever is greater 4.00 106 Cheng Insurance General Commercial 800 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 3.2 107 -108 Evergreen Financial General Commercial 800 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 3.20 208 Jean Hsiang Law Office Professional Office 600 N/A N/A 1/285 s.f. 2.11 209 Lee's Tailoring General Commercial 800 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 3.20 210 De Anza Dental Lab Professional Office 570 N/A N/A 1/285 s.f. 2.00 211 Skin Care Prof. Spa General Commercial 560 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 2.24 212 Aroma Wellness Massage Medical Office 800 N/A N/A 1/175 s.f. 4.57 213 MS Engineering Professional Office 800 N/A N/A 1/285 s.f. 2.81 214 -215 Precision Dental Lab Professional Office 2,200 N/A N/A 1/285 s.f. 7.72 216 Vacant General Commercial 1,344 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 5.38 301 -302 jPolyphony Music Academy Specialized School 1,100 2 1 students + statt or 1/250 s.f., whichever is greater 4.40 303 -304 Aloha Mind Math Specialized School 1,050 3 1 students + statt or 1/250 s.f., whichever is greater 4.20 305 -306 Vacant General Commercial 1,050 N/A N/A 1/250 s.f. 4.20 307 -308 Dr. Leung /A Puff Away Medical Office 1,100 N/A N/A 1/175 s.f. 6.29 Total spaces required 74.00 On site spaces available 88 Current Available stalls 14.00 Building size (sq. ft.)- 17,030 40% office (25% max) 25% specialized school (50% max) W ..... ........... .:.. r' ,.... _ I.I.. .. ;j;';i; �.:y ! .. I... ... .. ,,,,. .. .,, ,.. ..� .. ...... ... .. ... :. ... ... .. ... �. ... ., ;;i�' ` vi i !, r+w.wiW ' ij ? 7.f1'; '!`c :• fi;': ... il:h. " I'.: i::; i:�l+!.1'F.iro$',i'= r :.pyr?�_1;� .. .... .. .. � ,. , . ,.. I ..: •: 'lip. i'rti;i:i �: '. ',':Fa"w ` 4 I. 1! I. I. 'J! I r r ' 1 f r D:F f � I '. 9r SI wf. 'I I rw1�W�rr I ', I pp � I 7f1^Ir w k' �!. ,, I ' e�i?u {• � t,5 SII � i : 's'I• I � • •i I ■ :rl , L I r. I . �. .., r.r:�� i G. Lr G. .h i:. r, :.. . • _ :.;lay r . '.x a , Q .. a :, r' . I .. •: - la II I ._a.. ,. _ l.. : T ... . ; � ••r�.,','! "i �.. I ; •!4 I{4+a• J.f.la sL'f.l• _I ., I .P ; i• . �i Wi 2 3 . i #. } 1 ' • . :., . � -''I :S�•. "ter= ryk `,. . 7T ^� ., } .. ma y ;. ::;;k•!.'� -- - ..... ........... .:.. r' ,.... _ I.I.. .. ;j;';i; �.:y ! .. I... ... .. ,,,,. .. .,, ,.. ..� .. ...... ... .. ... :. ... ... .. ... �. ... ., ;;i�' ` vi i !, r+w.wiW ' ij ? 7.f1'; '!`c :• fi;': ... il:h. " I'.: i::; i:�l+!.1'F.iro$',i'= r :.pyr?�_1;� .. .... .. .. � ,. , . ,.. I ..: •: 'lip. i'rti;i:i �: '. ',':Fa"w ` 4 I. 1! I. I. 'J! I r r ' 1 f r D:F f � I '. 9r SI wf. 'I I rw1�W�rr I ', I pp � I 7f1^Ir w k' �!. ,, I ' e�i?u {• � t,5 SII � i : 's'I• I � • •i I ■ :rl , L I r. I . �. .., r.r:�� i G. Lr G. .h i:. r, :.. . • _ :.;lay r . '.x a , Q .. a :, r' . I .. •: - la II I ._a.. ,. _ l.. : T ... . ; � ••r�.,','! "i �.. I ; •!4 I{4+a• J.f.la sL'f.l• _I ., I .P ; i• . �i OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CUPERTINO Agenda Item No: 5 Applications: CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 -3255 (408) 777 -3308 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • hlanning @cuperttino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011 -09 Agenda Date: June 14, 2011 Applicant /Owner: Tony Chen and Yunjian Zou (O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy)/ Charles Chan Property Location: 10070 Imperial Avenue (APN 357 -17 -066) APPLICATION SUMMARY: 1. Use Permit (U- 2010 -02) to allow a day care center with an after - school learning program at an existing 5,600 square foot office building. 2. Tree Removal Permit (TR- 2011 -09) to allow the removal and replacement of three (3) trees. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Approve the Use Permit (U- 2010 -02) and Tree Removal Permit (TR- 2011 -09) in accordance with the draft resolutions. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation Neighborhood Commercial/ Residential Zoning Designation P (CN, ML, Res 4 -12 DU /AC)- Planned Development with Neighborhood Commercial, Light Industrial, and Residential uses between 4 and 12 dwelling units per acre Environmental Assessment Categorically Exempt Lot Size 16,900 square feet (.39 acres) Existing Building Area 5,600 square feet Proposed Building Area None Existing Parking Stalls 9 Required/Provided Parking Stalls 7 required, 13 provided Existing height 14 feet 6 inches Proposed number of children 40 Proposed number of staff 4 Proposed hours of operation 12pm to 6:30pm (regular); 8:30am to 6:30pm (Summer) BACKGROUND: The project site is located at 10070 Imperial Avenue at the eastern terminus of Granada Avenue. The previous use at the site included offices for Comcast. The building was designed as an office building and built under the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County and annexed into the City in 1980. There are general commercial uses to the north; the Astoria condominiums to the south; single - family housing and automotive repair uses to the west; and the Union Pacific railroad tracks to the east. See the vicinity aerial below: 63 U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011 -09 O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy June 14, 2011 Since 2009, the applicant has occupied the entire building with a martial arts academy and a dance studio. The applicant proposes to continue the existing uses and expand their operation to facilitate a day care /after - school program serving up to 40 children. The applicant has obtained approval through the State Department of Education to operate a heritage school. Heritage schools offer education or academic tutoring, or both, in a foreign language; offer education on the culture, traditions, or history of a country other than the United States; and offer culturally enriching activities based on the culture or customs of a country other than the United States. Per state law, heritage schools are not subject to State Department of Social Services Licensing Requirements, provided that no children are less than 4 years 9 months old. The State Department of Social Services confirmed that the day care is not subject to their licensing requirements. DISCUSSION: The child care provider, O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy, provides the following operational information about their operations (Attachment 3): Day Care /After School Programs: Days of operation: Hours of operation: Maximum Capacity: No. of classrooms: Childcare Staff: Monday through Friday 12pm to 6pm (8:30am to 6:30pm during Summer hours) 40 children (ages - 4 years 9 months to 12 years) 4 4 (one staff per classroom; one staff for every 10 children) M U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011 -09 O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy June 14, 2011 Pick -Up, Drop -Off, and Driveway Widening The applicant has reserved and will provide appropriate signage for five (5) onsite spaces for pick- up and drop -off. The spaces are perpendicular to a new four (4) foot wide walkway that will lead parents and children safely to the building entrance. Wheel stops are also proposed to limit vehicles from overhanging the walkway. Drop -off times are scheduled from 12- 12:20pm and pick -up times are scheduled from 6- 6:30pm. Currently, the site is accessed by one existing non- conforming 16 -foot wide driveway entrance from Imperial Avenue. The project is required to widen this driveway to 22 feet, including the potential of having to relocate and /or modify any adjacent ancillary utility structures, in order to comply with the City's current standards and to ensure safe passage between vehicles entering and exiting the parking lot. The existing driveway chain link fence is also proposed for removal to allow more vehicle turning radii. Directional signage will direct parents to the pick -up /drop -off area. The final site plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Parking The City's Parking Ordinance requires seven (7) onsite parking spaces (1 space per 6.5 children) based on the proposed number of children at the facility. The applicant proposes to provide 13 onsite parking spaces to accommodate pick -up and drop -off and staff parking. All new onsite spaces meet City requirements. There are also eight (8) diagonal on- street parking spaces directly in front of the building near the main entrance. The site is located within an area identified by the General Plan where property owners can obtain credit for on- street parking spaces. Site Improvements As part of this application, the applicant is proposing to install the following site improvements on the existing paved area to the side and rear of the building: • Re- oriented parking lot with associated landscaping buffers and lighting • City - standard trash enclosure • 1,740 square foot uncovered, fenced -in play area (no play structures proposed) • Play area walkway The site improvements are consistent with the City's Parking Ordinance and Trash Enclosure Guidelines. Tree Removals and Replacements One Evergreen Ash and two Flowering Pear trees are currently located in place of a new parking lot landscape buffer. The project arborist evaluated the trees with the proposed project and recommended removal since the construction would negatively impact the trees (see Attachment 4). The small diameter trees are proposed to be replaced with three new 24 -inch box trees. In addition, several screening shrubs are proposed to be planted to provide additional screening along the property lines. Noise Considerations A noise study was conducted by professional acoustical engineer, Stan Shelly, to evaluate any potential noise impacts from the proposed indoor day care and outdoor play area (see Attachment 5). The site is 65 Existing 16' wide two -way driveway U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011 -09 O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy June 14, 2011 bordered to the east and west by a six (6) foot tall redwood fence on top of a two (2) foot high concrete masonry wall. The nearest sensitive receptors are the Astoria condominiums to the south (75 feet away) and several single family homes to the west (70 feet away). Potentially noisy activities associated with the project are in the outdoor play area behind the building. There are two play times scheduled a day from 4:30 to 5:05pm. There will be two groups of 20 children out at 15 minutes a time (see Attachment 6). The noise study concluded that given the existing ambient noise level and the presence of the existing eight (8) foot tall fence, the project is not anticipated to generate significant noise impacts and is within the allowable maximum allowed noise levels. In addition, potential noise impacts from indoors would be negligible due to the noise attenuation by the walls and windows of the building. Public Outreach The City sent notices to property owners within 500 feet of the project on June 3, 2011. The applicant personally delivered unofficial notices to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Notices were mailed to those without physical addresses and to those living outside the City. As of the date of staff report production, no public comments have been received by the Planning Division. Interagency and Environmental Review Comments from Other Departments The City's Public Works Department, Building Division, and the Santa Clara County Fire Department reviewed the project and have no objections. Their comments have been included as conditions of approval. Environmental Assessment The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15301 (Existing facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Prepared by: George Schroeder, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: /s/ Gary Chao Gary Chao City Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution for Use Permit Approved by: /s /Aarti Shrivastava Aarti Shrivastava Community Development Director 2. Draft Resolution for Tree Removal Permit 3. O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy Business Plan 4. Consulting Arborist Report by Deborah Ellis dated December 3, 2010 5. Noise Impact and Mitigation Study by Stan Shelly dated August 13, 2010 6. Outdoor Play Area Schedule 7. Plan Set G: Planning � PDREPORT � pc U reports � 2011ureports � U- 2010 -02, TR- 2011- 09.docx •• ATTACHMENT 1 U- 2010 -02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DAY CARE CENTER AT AN EXISTING 5,600 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILING LOCATED AT 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U- 2010 -02 Applicant/ property owner: Tony Chen and Yunjian Zou (O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy), Charles Chan Location: 10070 Imperial Avenue (APN: 35717 066) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the City's zoning ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the initial study, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,: 1. The application for a Use Permit, Application no. U- 2010 -02 is hereby approved, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no U- 2010 -02 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 67 Resolution No. U- 2010 -02 June 14, 2011 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS This approval is based on Exhibits titled "Revised Business Plan" prepared by the applicant consisting of five pages; "OMei Learning Center Conditional Use Permit, 10070 Imperial Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014;' prepared by Arun Shah and Associates dated July 8, 2010 with revision dates of March 9, 2011 and May 24, 2011 consisting of 8 pages; "OMei Learning Center Landscape Plan, 10070 Imperial Avenue, Cupertino, CA," prepared by W. Jeffrey Heid dated January 26, 2011 and consisting of one page; and "Untitled Lighting Plan," prepared by Elite Energies, Inc. consisting of one page, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted for a child care facility with 40 total enrolled children. Any changes in the operation parameters outside of this approval must be reviewed and approved by the City. Planning Staff has the ability to approve minor modifications to the business plan as long as the changes are consistent with any applicable Building and /or Fire Codes (including but not limited to accessibility, fire safety, and building occupancy and other appropriate agencies). In the event that a pre - school is opened, when children younger than four (4) years nine (9) months are enrolled, and /or if the business loses its Hertiage School Designation, the business owner shall obtain the proper licensing from the State of California Community Care Licensing Division and notify the City Planning Division. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. TR- 2011 -09 shall be applicable to this approval. 4. DRIVEWAY WIDENING Prior to final occupancy of the day care, the applicant shall widen the driveway along Imperial Avenue to at least 22 feet, which includes, but not limited to removing power poles and /or street lights. 5. TOTAL AVAILABLE PARKING The site shall provide a minimum of 13 available parking stalls. The stalls perpendicular to the play area shall be reserved for pick up and drop off with appropriate signage. 6. CHILD PICK -UP AND DROP -OFF PLAN In order to ensure the safety of children and vehicle movements during the pick -up and drop -off periods of the day care, the applicant shall submit a children pick -up and drop -off plan to the City for review and approval prior to the release of final occupancy. Such plan shall delineate general pedestrian/ vehicular safety guidelines for parents, appropriate directional signs /parking lot striping (as needed) and parking lot safety measures to include a traffic safety conductor be present in the parking lot to monitor and direct all vehicular activities during pick up and drop off times. In the event that the pick -up and drop -off schedule changes, the applicant must submit a revised plan to the City for approval. 7. NOISE CONTROL The outdoor play area schedule shall be limited as indicated in the Business Plan. Noise levels shall not exceed those as listed in Chapter 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. .: Resolution No. U- 2010 -02 June 14, 2011 8. FINAL TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION The trash enclosure shall be relocated to the southeast corner of the building in order to be minimally visible from public view. 9. FINAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN All new lighting must conform to the standards in the General Commercial (CG) Ordinance, and the final lighting plan (including a detailed photometric plan) shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to building permit issuance. 10. FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a final landscaping plan in conformance with the City's Landscape Ordinance (Chapter 14.15). If the landscaping area (defined by section 14.15.030) is greater than 2,500 square feet, then a full landscape project submittal per section 14.15.040 is required prior to issuance of building permits. 11. FINAL FENCING DESIGN The final play area fencing design shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits. 12. BUSINESS LICENSE Prior to final occupancy, the business owner shall update the information provided on the City business license to include day care/ after school uses. 13. EXPIRATION DATE If the use for which this conditional use permit is granted and utilized has ceased or has been suspended for one year or more, this permit shall be deemed expired and a new use permit application must be applied for and obtained. 14. RECYCLING OF DEMOLISHED BUILDING MATERIALS A condition will be added to require recycling of demolished building materials to the maximum extent possible. 15. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. 16. REVOCATION OF USE PERMIT The Director may initiate proceedings for revocation of the Use Permit in any case where, in the judgment of the Director, substantial evidence indicates that the conditions of the conditional use permit have not been implemented, or where the permit is being conducted in a manner detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, in accord with the requirements of Chapter 19.124. 17. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. .• Resolution No. U- 2010 -02 June 14, 2011 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE BUILDING DIVISION ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL An accessible primary path of travel shall be shown from each accessible parking stall to an accessible entrance into the building. 2. EXITING Two reasonably separated exits are required from the outdoor play area equipped with panic hardware. SECTION V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET WIDENING Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 2. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 3. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 4. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and /or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 5. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post - development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on -site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation of the culvert to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 7. BICYCLE PARKING The developer shall provide bicycle parking consistent with the City's requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 70 Resolution No. U- 2010 -02 8. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT June 14, 2011 The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits a. Fees: b. a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ Per current fee schedule ($2,468.00 or 5 %) c. b. Grading Permit: $ Per current fee schedule ($2,217.00 or 5 %) d. c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 1,000.00 e. d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ TBD f. e. Power Cost: ** g. f. Map Checking Fees: $ Per current fee schedule (N /A) h. g. Park Fees: $ Per current fee schedule (N /A) i. h. Street Tree By Developer j. ** Based on the latest effective PG &E rate schedule approved by the PUC k. Bonds: 1. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off -site and On -site Improvements m. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off -site and On -site Improvement n. On -site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. o. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 9. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 10. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 11. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 12. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and /or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing 71 Resolution No. U- 2010 -02 June 14, 2011 criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 13. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 14. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading / erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 15. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non - standard appurtenances in the public road right -of -way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 16. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 17. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 18. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 19. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 20. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 21. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. 22. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 23. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY CLEARANCE Provide San Jose Water Company approval before issuance of a building permit approval. 72 Resolution No. U- 2010 -02 24. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES June 14, 2011 The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject development. 25. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to issuance of building permits. 26. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG &E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and /or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. SECTION VI: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT INTERIOR REMODEL A review by the County Fire Department of any such interior remodel construction is required. 2. INSPECTION The County Fire Department shall inspect the premises for compliance with applicable State requirements. SECTION VII: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT 3. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Sanitary sewer is currently available for the subject parcel. 4. IMPROVEMENT PLANS Improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review and comments. 5. FEES AND PERMITS Cupertino Sanitary District fees and permits will be required. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission 73 ATTACHMENT 2 TR- 2011 -09 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 3 TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS AT A NEW DAY CARE CENTER LOCATED AT 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR- 2011 -09 Applicant/ property owner: Tony Chen and Yunjian Zou (O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy), Charles Chan Location: 10070 Imperial Avenue (APN 357 -17 -015) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for tree removal, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regard to this application: 1. That the tree or trees are irreversibly diseased, are in danger of falling, can cause potential damage to existing or proposed essential structures, or interferes with private on -site utility services and cannot be controlled or remedied through reasonable relocation or modification of the structure or utility services; 2. That the protected tree(s) are a detriment to the subject property and cannot be adequately supported according to good urban forestry practices due to the overplanting or overcrowding of trees on the subject property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof,: The application for a Tree Removal Permit, Application no. TR- 2011 -09, is hereby approved, and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR- 2011 -09 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED REMOVALS The approval is based on the arborist report prepared by Deborah Ellis, Consulting Arborist and Horticulturist dated December 3, 2010, "10070 Imperial Avenue, Cupertino," except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 74 Resolution No. TR- 2011 -09 April 12, 2011 2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. U- 2010 -02 shall be applicable to this approval. 3. REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall be required to plant a total of three (3) 24 -inch box trees on the property in accordance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. The required replacement trees shall be planted prior to final occupancy of the project associated with file no. U- 2010 -02. 4. ADDITIONAL TREE REPLACEMENTS The Director of Community Development shall have the discretion to require additional tree replacements as deemed necessary. The final tree replacement plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to final building approval. 5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Planning Commission 75 ATTACHMENT 3 O -MEI TAICHI CULTURE ACADEMY • V Use Permit to allow a new daycare facility; Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of three trees in conjunction with parking lot and landscaping improvements at a new daycare facility. Submitted By: O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy May 27, 2011 76 Summary: Since its inception in 1997, O -Mei Academy has served the community by providing excellent Chinese Cultural classes throughout the Bay Area: Oakland, Fremont, San Leandro, and Milpitas. Our courses provided a need for students of various ethnic backgrounds whose interest and desire to learn Chinese Language, Calligraphy, Folk Dance, Martial Arts and other many other forms of Chinese Arts and Culture. We have developed successful tutoring and after school programs, where students have won many awards in academic achievements, Martial Arts competitions, Chess Tournaments, Beauty Pageants, and more. Alumni of O -Mei Academy have gone on to top tier Universities such as Harvard, Stanford, UC Berkeley, UCLA, and West Point, just to name a few. At O -Mei Academy, we strive to provide the best in every aspect of education that parents expect and children need to successfully compete in the growing globalization. There are approximately 40 students at O -Mei Academy with maximum of 10 students per level. Each level refers to an age range that corresponds to each grade level. Hours are operations are 12 noon to 6:30 pm. There are 4 classrooms with 4 teachers; 1 teacher per classroom of maximum of 10 students per classroom. O -Mei Academy is registered as a Heritage School with the State of California and is exempt from Community Care Licensing Requirements. Any decision to apply for Day Care /Pre- School is not in the immediately business plans. Future Plans and Growth strategy: Cupertino has a diverse population of about 55,000 with one of the most progressive and technologically savvy residence in Northern California. Its residents comprised mostly of engineers and other working professionals, and as a result, the families of Cupertino are also known to place a high value on education, reflected in the city's award winning school system. It is also home to one of the largest Asian populations in the San Francisco Bay Area. The private sector is dominated by high -tech electronics and computer corporations, such as Apple and Symantec. In short, quality schools and proximity to high -tech jobs make Cupertino a desirable Silicon Valley address for a highly educated and culturally diverse population. Education, innovation, and collaboration are the hallmarks nourished by the city government, the community, and local industry and commerce. Page 'I of 5 77 O -Mei Academy plans to secure, operate and expand into the City of Cupertino at 10070 Imperial Avenue with O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy. Its location is situated in a (California zone type) Neighborhood /Commercial zone. The subject building is strategically located near the core and is easily assessable by public transportation. Given that the majority of the area's commercial buildings are occupied by tech - firms, whose employees are mostly family oriented, after school programs such as those available at O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy are in demand. This also brings to Cupertino one of the largest, most dynamic and well respected Academy of its kind. Description of Operation Activities: Phase I O -Mei Taichi Culture Academy proposes to use this location for an after school program. The facility can accommodate a maximum of 40 school age students. With 4 classrooms, each classroom can accommodate 10 children under the supervision of 1 adult teacher per 1 level per classroom. Hours of operations are from 12 noon to 6pm. Early hours of operations is limited only to summer programs and will operate from 8:30am to 6:30pm, Monday to Friday. If summer program is available, all levels of students and number of students per classroom and teacher per classroom will be the same as during the regular semester. Courses of emphasis during the normal school semesters are: • Chinese Language: Training students to listen, speak, read and write simplified and traditional Chinese characters, and its romanization form of Hanyu or Pinyin. • Mathematics: Developing students' skills to apply mathematic principles and concepts to problem solving and logic reasoning. • Homework Tutorial: Assist and ensure that students complete their homework assignment from their regular school. • Kung Fu: Teach eighteen sets of Kung Fu and self-defense methods. This is one of our most popular class that build students confidence, instill discipline, develop character and learn that hard work results in a positive attitude to achieve success. ® Dance: Teaching basic dance and performance skills, such as ballet and folk dance. Page 2 of 5 IS • Drawing: Teaching students basic drawing skills in sketching, watercolor, ink and other styles. . • English reading and writing: Help students improve their writing skills and reading levels. • Abacus: Improve calculation skill and speed, develop human memory and logical inference and enhance children's training in concentration and patience. • College Prep courses such as SAT, AP and other academic exam prep workshops. Page 3 of 5 79 Schedule of Operations Activities: After School Program Schedule (Level 1 -2)* 12:00 -1:30 Lunch 1 Free Play 1:30 -2:30 Lunch Break 2:30 -3:00 Story Poem Drawing Cartoon Reading 3:00 -3:30 Homework: English, Math and Chinese 3:30 -3:45 Snack Time 3:45 -4:30 Chinese Kung Fu Chinese Chinese Abacus 4:30445 Recess 4:45 -5:30 Oil Painting .Chinese Math Dance Craft 5:30 -6:00 Kung Fu -- Chess - -Games 6:00 -6 :30 Parents pick up time After School Program Schedule (Level 3 -4) ** 3:00 -3:45 Homework: English, Math and Chinese 3:45 -4:00 Snack Time 4:00 -4:50 Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Kungfu 4 :50 -5:05 Recess 5:05 -5:50 Oil Painting Math Dance English Craft 5:50 -6:30 Kung Fu -- Chess -- Games 6:00 -6:30 Parents pick up time rt School does not provide lunch to students. Parents are advised to provide lunch for their children. • Students in Levels 1 comprise of children from K to G1 (4 3 / to 6 years). • Students in Levels 2 comprise of children from G2 to G3 (7 to 8 years). "* Students in Levels 3 comprise of children from G4 to G5 (9 to 10,years). ** Students in Level 4 comprise of children from G5 to G6 (11 years to 12 years). Page 4 of 5 -0 Phase 11 O -Mei Taichi and Culture Academy hopes to offer Day Care within the next five years but is not in its immediate plans for at least three to four years. Due to the current state of the economy, offering pre - school at its current location would depend largely on the future conditions of the following: supply and demand, competition, the state of economy, growth and success of current program, cost for construction and the business direction of its business partners. Conclusion Much has been changed since initial plans were proposed in 2010. The cost of construction has risen, the construction permit process has taken longer than anticipated, a growing number of competition and a change of pattern in how families are making choices in providing their students extracurricular activities. Nevertheless, the owners of O -Mei Academy have absolute confidence in its programs and believe that it will continue to grow. Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Sefvice since 1984 Mr. Yunian Zou O -Mei Academy 10700 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 December 3, 2010 10700 Imperial Avenue, Cupertino • Impact of proposed new landscape planting area to existing trees along east property line • Identification and trunk diameters of the existing trees • Recommendations for new parking lot tree species • Planting specifications for new parking lot trees to be installed Dear Mr. Zou: We met on site with Charlie Chan earlier this week to look at and discuss the three existing frees along the east perimeter, as requested by the City of Cupertino Office of Community Development in their letter to you dated October 12, 2010. These trees are shown in the photo above. I have corresponded with your project landscape architect, Jeff Heid about the City requirements. I have also reviewed the Site Plan from Arun Shah & Associates dated September 27, 2010. A copy of this Site Map showing the location of these trees on the property is included on page 3. PO Box 3714, 5aratoge, CA 95070. 408 -725 -1357. decah @pacbell.net. http : / /Www.decah.com. 0 -Mei Academy Arborist Report. December 3, 2010. Page 1 of 6 Y' Deborah Ellis, M5 Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist - 41 ,Seruice since 1984 SUMMARY If the existing planter along the east property line of the site will be made narrower (see the Site Plana, next page) then all three of the existing trees should be removed. Even if this planting area were not to be reconfigured I would recommend the removal of ash tree ##t, which is causing a moderate amount of root damage to the surrounding pavement and curb at this time. In the future as this tree grows larger however, it will cause a significant and unacceptable level of pavement damage. It was not a good tree species to plant in this location in the first place. The two smaller pear trees are in reasonably good condition and are not causing any pavement damage at this time. The planter reconfiguration would cause grading to be right at the edge or slightly beyond of the root collars of these pears, however. This would cause severe damage to the root system and the trees may fall over and would likely die. My best recommendation for the new planter area, which will only be four feet wide, would be to install shrubs here instead of trees, and utilize the east neighbor's existing trees as background and screening. This way you will not end up with two competing rows of trees planted close together, with pavement damage likely to occur to the 0- Mei parking lot pavement. The south perimeter of the parking lot is also of concern to the City from a screening standpoint. This should be planted with tall- growing screen shrubs which can be shear - pruned to keep them narrow, and /or fastigiate (narrow, columnar form) trees. Broader- canopy trees could be interspersed by planting them in the larger island planter areas as have been drawn in on the Site Plan (see page 3). The photo above shows the asphalt pavement around ash tree #1. Small arrows point to cracks in the curb around the small planter in which this tree is located. Larger arrows point to the hump and crack (about a 3 to 4 -inch vertical displacement) to the right of the tree. Yes, that is an elephant at liar left! PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408- 725 -1357, decah@pacbell.net. http: / /Www.decah.eom. O -Mei Academy Arborist Report. December 3, 2010. Page 2 of 6 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist 41 ,Service siu.ce 1984 t _ I as Palc OUTDOOR PLAY AREA J W GATES Yi PAW HARDY �� New tree, broader Brown 10070 IEI LANDSCAPED AREA M LANDSCAPED AREA IMPERIAL AVENUE SITE PLAN 7-4) LJ - Vs' -1'-O �1 PERTE. own ON NAu DO W flDE- CM OUM OW 511.18 T BUSTING M ENTRY PATE TO ®E IEtM 7 MIT Palls Existing /Proposed Site Plan Note: my plan mark -ups are in blue and green; other's mark -ups are in red. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408- 725 -1357. decah @pacbell.net. http: / /www.decah.com. O -Nlei Academy Arborist Report. December 3, 2010. Page 3 of 6 r '- ea'-o I'MI,e IEi Kolo a lP" / PENCE C,414- 49og" Ln� ,'.,] hey ila fidtRig W.Raq A" ;t" r1rN �p PlANT pear Ine Tp III -A D I Y I., SEI STQUTE WK I TU REWH — LAN -CDVM PLAY ILEA - 1.63a 5a Fl. APPJW. l�r 9 isting trees, �eplarrr with ex new small - stature ° X0.0 ) 04 LANDSCAPE ' ssaAa WES o�Txc c '� •� 14.iC0.0 G.GSG roP Arses, or with shrub n Plant new t _ I as Palc OUTDOOR PLAY AREA J W GATES Yi PAW HARDY �� New tree, broader Brown 10070 IEI LANDSCAPED AREA M LANDSCAPED AREA IMPERIAL AVENUE SITE PLAN 7-4) LJ - Vs' -1'-O �1 PERTE. own ON NAu DO W flDE- CM OUM OW 511.18 T BUSTING M ENTRY PATE TO ®E IEtM 7 MIT Palls Existing /Proposed Site Plan Note: my plan mark -ups are in blue and green; other's mark -ups are in red. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408- 725 -1357. decah @pacbell.net. http: / /www.decah.com. O -Nlei Academy Arborist Report. December 3, 2010. Page 3 of 6 r '- ea'-o s'-P• 0 l tree broader -crown W LANDSCAPE Mrf4p - e "n`r• l `.LQ^r'•r 1 �- (N) UGNT POLE �` PER CIC '� •� 14.iC0.0 G.GSG roP � n Plant new P p n trees, small- II stature in narrow linear perimeter planter :A Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist 41 *wire siaee 1984 DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS Mr. Zoe would like to remodel the east property line planting area which is now consist of 3 separate cutout planter cutouts, 8 feet long by 6 feet wide. The plan is to reduce the width of the planting area to 4 feet wide, but make the landscape area a continuous linear planter. The reason for this is to make room for more parking spaces in the parking lot. There is a problem with too many people parking in the street at this time, and it would be beneficial for more of these cars to be spending their time in the parking lot. If the planter is remodeled to make it narrower though, the existing trees will need to be removed. The trunks of these trees are close to mid - planter now, and the cut would be right at the trunk. The Northernmost tree, an evergreen ash, is lifting the asphalt pavement around it and this damage will increase substantially as the tree grows larger. Even if the ash survives the reduction in planterwidth, the tree's roots will cause an unacceptable amount of pavement damage in the future. My best recommendation is to remove all 3 trees and replant with new trees (or better yet shrubs) that will adapt to the site conditions easily. The 3 existing trees are in reasonably good condition but the ash tree poses a significant and costly problem is most economically dealt with now. In addition, I am not sure that the 2 pear trees will survive the planter renovation. If the City requires that the 2 pear trees remain, then there are two options -- make the planter wider in front of these trees, or construct the planter as designed and hope for the best. But there will be a good chance that the trees don't make it, and they could also fall over from the root cutting. There are also 3 large black locust trees (Robinia pseudoacacia, probably the Idaho' cultivarl behind the fence to the east of the three subject trees. These black locust trees are about the same size as the ash and pear trees (about 30 feet tall). Therefore the east perimeter fence line will not be devoid of tree canopies if all 3 subject trees are removed. This presents you with the option of planting screen shrubs, instead of trees in the narrower planting area. From a pavement damage and intelligent landscaping perspective, this would be better than planting trees in this area. When I say "intelligent landscaping" I mean not planting trees just for the sake of planting and /or replacing trees. I mean installing plants that make sense for the site in terms of both function and appearance. If you plant trees behind the existing trees on fhe neighbor's property, you will have trees backing up to trees. Instead you could better utilize the trees on the neighbor's property by not planting something directly on the other side of the fence that is going to compete and interfere with the growth of both sets of these trees. Trees are not always the best solution! Examples of screen shrubs you might consider are Pittosporum tenuffolium, Photfnia, Prunus caroliniana (Carolina cherry), or if you want something more drought tolerant you might try Myrica calffornica (Pacific wax myrtle) or Rhamnus alaternus (Italian buckthorn). These shrubs could be shear- pruned to keep them within the bounds of the planter and below the canopy of the neighboring trees. Another option would be to plant shorter - growing shrubs, not used as a screen, in the planter area. Examples of shorter shrubs would be the smaller cultivarl of India hawthorn (Rhaphiolepfs indica), or one of the dwarf oleander cultivars such as Nerium 'Petite Pink' or 'Petite Salmon'. Will the removal of the 3 trees on the O -Mei property negatively affect the east neighbor's black locust trees? If there is any negative effect such as sunburn to foliage or sunscald of branches, I think that this will be minimal and of short duration. The locusts are young, vigorous trees and they PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408 -725 -1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.deca Academy Arborist Report, December 3, 2010. ?age 4 of 6 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service suite 1981 are a tough tree species in general. In the long term the removal of trees on the O -Mei property should benefit the growth and appearance of the neighboring black locust trees. If the City insists that new trees be planted along the east perimeter fence line, then I would stick with small stature trees so as to minimize future pavement damage and not compete with the neighboring trees. So then we're into the old stand -by's like crape myrtle hybrids (Lagerstroernia hybrids), Swamp myrtle (Tristaniopsis laurina), perhaps standards (shrubs trained to a single trunk, so that they grow as a small tree) such as Carolina laurel cherry, Oleander, etc. Regarding the south perimeter, I would have the some general recommendations as for the east perimeter. A good tree choice for the south perimeter would be Italian cypress, Cupressus sempervirens 'Stricta'. Italian cypress is a fastigiate tree, meaning that it grows tall and narrow; usually no wider than 8 feet after many years. It too can be shear - pruned to keep it narrower if necessary. If the larger island planters will be included in the design, you might plant some broader - canopy trees here (versus the fastigate trees along the fence line). Suggestions are crape myrtle, evergreen or deciduous flowering pear (Pyrus kawakami or P. calleryana) or Australian willow, Gerjera porviflora. Regarding tree planting specifications, I would like to wait to see which trees or shrubs are selected and know the final planter dimensions, irrigation methods and other factors before any specifications are developed for this prolect. The photos at right show the south perimeter of the site. The upper photo shows that portion of the south perimeter closest to Imperial Avenue. Note the tall but scraggly redwood trees close to the fence on the neighboring property. A fastigate tree species like Italian cypress would be a good choice for planting along the a -Mei side of fence so as not to interfere and be interfered with by the existing redwoods so much. Screen shrubs instead of trees would be an even better choice here, with broader - canopied trees like crape myrtle planted in wider parking lot island planters that are farther from the fence line and these redwood trees. The lower photo shows the portion of the south perimeter closest to the east perimeter fence line at left. There is a gap between the redwoods where there is no screening, and Italian cypress would do a good job of screening this area. P Q Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408 -725 -1357. decah@pacbell.net, http: / /www.decah.com. 0 -Mei Academy Arborist Report. December 3, 2010. Page 5 of 6 NET Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis EXISTING TREE DATA Tree Number: 1 Scientific name: Fraxinus uhdei Common Name: evergreen ash Trunk DBH (diameter at 4.5 feet above the ground): 9.8" Size (height x canopy spread in feet, estimated): 30 x 30 Condition' • Vigor: 90 • Structure: 60 Preservation Suitability: Poor Estimated Impact of Proposed Construction: Severe Action: Remove Reason: Construction, Future pavement damage Tree Number: 2 Scientific name: Pyrus calleryana Common Name: deciduous flowering pear Trunk DBH: 5.2" Size: 30 x 15 Condition • Vigor: 80 • Structure: 50 Preservation Suitability: Fair Estimated Impact of Proposed Construction: Severe Action: Remove Reason: Construction t Sercire since 1084 Tree Number: 3 Scientific name: Pyrus calleryana Common Name: deciduous flowering pear Trunk DBH: 6.3" Size: 30 x 18 Condition • Vigor: 90 • Structure: 60 Preservation Suitability: Fair /Good Estimated Impact of Proposed Construction: Severe Action: Remove Reason: Construction I hope this information has been helpful to you. Please call or send me an email if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, ( Deffie Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist #30022 ASCA registered Consulting Arborist #305 I.S.A. Board - Certified Master Arborist WE -4578 Condition & Preservation Suitability Ratings Trees are rated for Condition on a scale of zero to 100 with zero being a dead tree and 100 being the most perfect tree imaginable (which rarely exists), Using this scale, 100 = excellent, 80 = good, 60 = fair, 40 = poor, and 20 = unacceptable. There are two components of tree condition - Vigorand Structure. Each of these components is rated separately and then considered relative to the tree species and use of the site to obtain the Preservation Suitability Rating (i.e. "Is this tree worth keeping on this site, in this location?'). PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408.725 -1357, decah@pacbell.net, http;//www.decah.co Academy Arborist Report, December 3, 2010. Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT 5 Environmental Consulting Services 18488 Prospect Road — Suite 1, Saratoga, CA 95070 Phone: (408) 257 -1045 stanshell99(&toast.net FAX: (408) 257 -7235 August 13, 2010 Mr. Yun -Dian Zou O -Mei Academy 10070 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: Noise Impact and Mitigation Study for Conditional Use Permit Application for O -Mei Academy, 10070 Imperial Avenue, Cupertino Dear Mr. Zou, In response to your request I have evaluated the potential noise impacts that could be produced at nearby sensitive receptors by the proposed use of the building at 10070 Imperial Avenue in Cupertino for an elementary school leaming center. This report discusses the present environment, the proposed project and activities, and the associated operational noise impacts on nearby receptors, and compliance with the Cupertino Noise Ordinance. To summarize the conclusions of this report, the proposed changes to the use of the project site, building and new activities would be expected to meet the City Noise Ordinance and not produce any significant noise incidents on the site. Project Description [1] [2] The O -Mei Academy proposes to provide a year -round elementary school experience for approximately 30 kids on the subject site of approximately 16,900 square feet. O -Mei Academy proposes to operate a new Cupertino elementary school, using the existing 5600 square foot building at the subject address in Cupertino and the existing outdoor paved area for play activities behind the building. The property is in a Light Industrial planning zone, with the Occupancy code to be changed from B/F- 1 to A -3, B, E applying to school activities. Paved parking for 7 vehicles would be provided in front along the street and for 15 vehicles in back. The site has a 6 -7 foot wood fence on the east and south property lines. The facility would accommodate a group of 30 kids initially with a staff of 3, on class schedule of 8:30 am to 6:30 pm Monday through Friday. No evening, holiday or weekend activities are planned for site. Inside activities would include normal school educational, creative and play activities using three classrooms and also several other rooms for special activities. The outdoor paved play area behind the building would allow a number of types of play activities for school kids. Daily outdoor play periods for all kids at the same time would be 15 minutes in the mid- afternoon and 30 minutes at the end of the day during the parent pickup period. In the summer there would also be a 15- minute play period in the mid - morning period. There would be at least one staff person on duty for every 10 kids. Sensitive Receptor Locations The project area is a mixed residential and commercial neighborhood along Imperial Avenue at Granada Avenue in west Cupertino. The nearest sensitive receptor locations for noise generated by the Academy are several 2 -3 story apartment buildings south of the site on Imperial and several single family residences across Imperial at the Granada intersection. Other types of uses near the site on Imperial Avenue are commercial and are not considered sensitive to O -Mei Academy activities. A small park and an infrequently -used rail line are adjacent to the site to the east. Vehicle access to the project would be from Imperial Avenue, as at present. Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga -0 O -Mei Academy Project Noise Study — Cupertino Page 2 of 4 This study investigates the extent to which adjacent receptors could be impacted by noise from planned O -Mei Academy activities. The existing noise environment and potential noise impacts from the proposed project are discussed in the following sections. Ambient Noise Levels and Noise Sources in the Area The primary source of ambient noise near the project site is traffic on Imperial Avenue, a local street bounding the project site on the west side. Typical vehicle passby noise levels are in the 60 -70 dBA range at a distance of 25 feet. Trucks, buses, motorcycles, and poorly - muffled vehicles produce peak noise levels 5 to 15 dBA higher on passby. Noise is contributed to a lesser extent by sporadic vehicles on Granada Avenue. Large and small aircraft and helicopter overflights create infrequent noise incidents of 55 to 65 dBA. Background ambient noise levels are established by arterial traffic on Stevens Creek Boulevard one block north and high volume and high speed traffic on the 1 -85 freeway two blocks east. An auto repair facility across imperial Avenue generates a small amount of intermittent noise from power tools and pneumatic devices during the workday. Other than typical sporadic neighborhood yard care and garbage pickup activities, there are no other notable noise sources in the project area. Field noise measurements were made during the morning of August 6, 2010 with a CEL -440 Precision Noise Meter and Analyzer, calibrated with a B & K Model 4230 Sound Level Calibrator. Measurement locations were chosen to represent the site and key receptor locations, as described below: Location 1 — middle of O -Mei Academy play yard behind building. • Location 2 — at the corner of residential property across the Imperial Avenue /Granada Avenue intersection from the site (25 feet from traffic) • Location 3 — at the side of the multi -story residential property south of the project, 75 feet from Imperial Avenue and 70 feet from the south O -Mei property line. Noise levels were measured and are reported using percentile noise descriptors, as follows: L90 (the background noise level exceeded 90 % of the time), L50 (the median noise level exceeded 50% of the time), L1 (the peak level exceeded 1 % of the time), and L (the average energy - equivalent noise level). Measured noise levels are presented in Exhibit 1 below. The DNULdn noise levels were computed as the long -term average of the L using the daily traffic distribution in the area, with standard weighted penalties for the nighttime hours, and modeled with an enhanced version of the National Cooperative Highway Research Board traffic noise model [4]. EXHIBIT 1 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS (dBA) Proposed O -Mei Academy project, Imperial Avenue, Cupertino Location L90 L50 L L.l Ldn 1. middle of play yard in back of site 46 48 50 58 51 2. across intersection from site 47 50 56 67 59 3, residences south of site 46 48 51 60 54 Traffic is the dominant noise source near the project site, so noise levels at any location depend upon volume, speed and distance to the nearest traffic, and the Exhibit 1 monitored levels indicate those relationships. Location 1 is behind the O -Mei building and shielded from direct traffic noise, so noise levels are set by indirect traffic noise on nearby streets. Location 2 is close to both Imperial and Granada traffic, which sets the noise level, even though vehicle volume and speeds are low. Location 3 at the adjacent residential buildings is 70 feet from the Imperial /Granada intersection, but has direct noise from both streets. At all locations the L90 background noise level is a result of the moderate - volume traffic on Stevens Creek Boulevard one block north and 1 -85 two blocks east. During morning and evening periods, when Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga -e O -Mei Academy Project Noise Study — Cupertino Page 3 of 4 temperatures are tower and humidity higher, noise is transmitted more efficiently, and noise levels from 1 -85 can be higher by 5 -10 dB. Relevant Cupertino Noise Ordinance Limits [3] Section 10.48.040 of the Cupertino Noise Ordinance applies to this project, which limits noise during daytime hours (7 am to 8 pm) produced by sources adjacent to a residential property to 60 dBA, or by sources adjacent to commercial property to 65 dBA. Note that there are no activities during night time periods associated with the project, when City noise limits are more restrictive. In addition, brief daytime noise incidents on the site would be allowed somewhat higher noise levels by Ordinance section 10.48.050. For example, noise incidents that last less than 15 minutes during any two hour period are allowed to be 5 dB higher than the long -term general limits. Potential O -Mei Academy Noise Impacts Outdoor play activities behind building All potentially noisy activities associated with the project would be in the play yard behind the building and adjacent to the parking lot area. Indoor school activities would not be expected to be noticeable at any nearby locations. The potential noise impacts from outdoor activities are described in the following paragraphs: Kids have one or two outdoor play periods of 15 -30 minutes each day. During school hours there could be approximately 30 school kids at a time playing outside, including a 30 minute period starting at 6 pm when parents pickup the kids that do no walk to school. Outdoor kids' activities would include games with balls, such as basketball, kickball, tetherball and other outdoor games that can be played on a hard surface. Balls bouncing on the paved surface can create intermittent noise levels of 55 -60 at 75 feet. Some of the noise generated would be from sporadic voices of kids playing and also staff directions, creating brief noise levels of 45 to 55 dBA at 75 feet. However, the only nearby receptors with a direct sound path from the play yard are upper floor windows at the residential buildings to the south, of which the closest are about 75 feet away. So a few of the upper floor windows could be exposed to sporadic sounds of 45 -60 dBA, similar to noise from cars coming in the residential driveway between the project and the residences. For this reason, the play yard noise would not be disturbing, even with the residential windows open. With the property line wood fence, ground level noise at nearby receptors would be less than 55 dBA, which is near the L50 ambient noise level and would not be noticeable. Properties across Imperial are farther away and would have similar noise levels as those adjacent at ground level. The anticipated noise levels for key locations are summarized in Exhibit 2. None of the anticipated noises would exceed the Noise Ordinance standards, since brief incidents are allowed. I *:4:11111111 _ POTENTIAL RECEPTOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA) O -Mel Academy — Imperial Avenue, Cupertino Location Max Noise Levels 1. residences south of property — closest upper 45 -60 windows facing project 2. residences south of property — ground level 40 -54 facing project 3. residences across Imperial Avenue 40 -55 Activities inside the building Potential noise impacts from O -Mei Academy activities inside the building, such as reading, art, music, and other classroom -type activities would be negligible because of noise attenuation by the walls and windows of the building, as well as distance. Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga 91 O -Mei Academy Project Noise Study — Cupertino Conclusions and Summary Page 4 of 4 Overall ambient noise levels in the project area now depend primarily on traffic noise, and this will continue to be the dominant noise source in the area in the foreseeable future. The primary noticeable noise would be intermittent and brief voice incidents and ball bouncing. With the type of activities planned, the small number of kids, the distances involved, and property -line fence protection, the planned O -Mei Academy activities would be within the City noise ordinance limits, and would not be expected to create any noise impacts at adjacent receptor areas. If I may be of further assistance on this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, �l H. Stanton Shelly Acoustical Consultant Board Certified Member (1982) Institute of Noise Control Engineering REFERENCES 1. Project Drawings: OMEI LEARNING CENTER, Conditional Use Permit, 5 sheets; Arun Shah and Associates, Fremont, CA; July 8, 2010. 2. Operational information sheet and facility activity description for O -Mei Academy, July 2010. 3. Noise Ordinance, Municipal Code Section 10.48, Noise levels for residential and commercial zones; City of Cupertino; 199 4. Highway Noise - A Design Guide for Highway Engineers, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 117, Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1971 (model enhanced and field validated by ECS). Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga 91 ATTACHMENT 6 m Outdoor play area Total playground sq.ft: 1740 School age play area sq.ft : 1740 Childdren will have outdoor play two times a day. School age playground schedule AM/PM Age Group Total Children Time Sehedule PM School Age 20 4:30- 4:45pm 20 4:50- 5:05pm Operational information: Days of operation: Monday to Friday Hours of operation:8:30am- 6:30pm Holidays Closings: Public holiday Total indoor Sq.ft : 6100 sf Occupant chart Room Age Students per staff Capacity Staff 1 School age 10 10 1 2 School age 10 10 1 3 School age 10 10 1 4 School age 10 10 1 Toad 40 4 92 O MEI LEARNING CENTER 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REM?JN __ __ __ __ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED � NEW CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY UNE CENTER �INE lH COLUMN UNE � I G DOOR MARK , � WINDOW MARK (`� v � REYISION "� � DATUM POINT � SECTION �� DETAIL � CONCRETE � CONCRETE BLOCK � EARTFI � GLASS GYPSUM BOARD � INSULATION, BATT INSULATION, RIGID ii'T/� METAL �'�'✓�� MEfAL LATH 0 PLASTER � PLYWOOD ROCK FILL � WOOD, fRAMiNG � WOOD SHIM OR BLOCKING CU PERTI NO, CA 95014 ABBREVIATIONS ACOUS. ACOUST�CAL p,�. ALUMINUM APPROX. APPROXIMATE ARCH. ARCHITECTUR4L BD. BOARD BLDG. BUILDING BLKG. BLOCKING BOT. BOTTOM CI. CAST IRON c�c. cEiuNc CLO. CLOSEf CLR. CLEAR C.O. CASED OPENING COL COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CONTINUOUS DEPT. DEPARTMENT DEf. DETAII DIA. DIAMETER DIM. DIMENSION DN. DOWN DISP. DISPENSER os. oowN sPOUT DWG. DRAWING EA. EACH EL ELEVATION ELEC. ELECTRICAL ELEV. ELEVATOR ENCL. ENCLOSURE EQ. EQUAL EXIS7. EXISTING EXT. EXTERIOR F.D. FLOOR DRPJN F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER F.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINET FIN. FINISH Fl,. F100R FLOUR. FLUORESCENT F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH F.O.S. fACE OF STUDS FT. f00T OR FEET FfG. FOOTING FURR. FURRING GA. GAUGE GALV. GALVANIZED G.B. GR46 BAR Gl. GLASS GYP. GYPSUM H.B. HOSE 816 H.0 HOLLOW CORE HOWD. HARDWOOD H.M HOLIOW METAL HORiZ. HORIZONTAL HR. HOUR HT. HEIGHT I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER (DIM.) INSUL. INSULATION INT. INTERIOR � JOINT KR. KITCHEN LAV. LAVATORY LT. LIGHT MAX. MAXIMUM MECH. MECHANICAL MET. METAL MFR. trtANUFACTURER MIN. MINIMUM MISC. MISCELLANEOUS MTD. MOUNTED GENERAL NOTES SCOPE OF WORK: SCOPE OF WORK INVOLVES USE OF EXISTING SPACE AT 10070 IIvPERIAL AVENUE, FOR AFTER SCHOOL TUTORING CENTER AND DAYCARE FOR CHILOREN ABOVE 4 YEARS 9 MONTHS AGE. HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE 12 PM TO 6:30 PM WEEKDAYS FOR CHILDREN FROM KINDERGARTEN TO 6TH GRADE. A RAMP INSIDE THE BUILDING WILL BE CREATED TO MAKE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ACCESSIBLE. CODES: CITY OF CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 2010 EDITION CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE 2010 EDITION CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 2010 EDITION CALIFORNIA PLUW8ING CODE 2010 EDITION CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2010 EDITION ALONG WITH ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. EXISTING CONDITIONS: INFORMATION ABOUT EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WERE OBTAINED FROM LIMITED RELD OBSERVATIONS AND DRAWINGS DATED JANUARY 11, 1979. ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES DOES NOT TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SHALL NOTIFY ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES OF ALL EXCEPTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDI WITH THE WORK. PROJECT DATA PROJECT ADDRESS 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE DRAWINGS CUPERTINO, CA 95014 AO ZONING: P(CN, ML, Res 4-12) A1.0 ASSESSORS PARCEL N0: 357-17-66 A2.1 A3.1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B (NO AFES) A3.2 A3.3 PREVIOUS OCCUPANCY: B/F-i PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: A-3, B, E (E) BUILDIN6 AREA: 5, 600 SQ. FT. APPROX. BASIC ALLOWABLE AREA� 6 000 SO FT FOR A-3 OCCUPANCY INDEX OF DRAWINGS (N) NEW N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO.OR� NUMBER N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE O.C. ON CENTER O.D. OUTSIDE DUIMETER(DIM.) OFF. OFFICE OPNG. OPENING OPP. OPPOSITE PRCST. PRECAST PL. PLATE P. U1M. PLASTIC LAMINATE PLAS. PLASTER PLYWD. PLYWOOD PT. POINT P.T.D. - PAPER 70WEL DISPENSER P.T.D./R. COMBINATION PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER dc RECEPTACLE P.T.R. PAPER TOWEL RECEPTACLE RAD. RADIUS R.D. ROOF DRAIN REF. REfERENCE REFR. REfRIGERATOR RGTR. REGISTER REINF. REINFORCED REQD. REQUIRED RM. ROOM R.O. ROUGH OPENING RWD. REDWOOD R.W.L RAIN WATER LEADER S.C. SOLID CORE S.C.D. SEAT COVER DISPENSER SCHED. SCHEDULE S.P. SOAP DISPENSER SECT. SECTION SH. SHELF SHR. SHOWER SHT. SHEET SIM. SIMILAR S.N.D. SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER S.N.R. SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACIE SPEC. SPECIFICATION S�. SQUARE S.ST. STAINLESS STEEL S.SK. SERVICE SINK STD. STANDARD STL. STEEL STOR. STORAGE STRL. STRUCTURAL SUSP. SUSPENDED SYM. SYMMEfT21CAL S.S.D. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS T.B. TOWEL BAR T.C. TOP OF CURB TEL. TELEPHONE T. & G. TONGUE Ac GROOVE THK. THICK T.P.D. TOILEf PAPER DISPENSER T.V. TELEVISION T.W. TOP OF WALL TYP. TYPICAL U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VERT. VERTICAL V.I.F. VERIfY IN FIELD W/ WITH W.C. WATER CLOSEf WD. WOOD W/0. WITHOUT WP. WATERPROOF WT. WEIGHT TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN F100R PLAN BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDING ELEVATIONS TRASH ENCLOSURE CONTACT INFORMATION 9, 000 SQ. FT� FOR B OCCUPANCY �• YUNJIAN ZOU 9, 500 S0. FT. FOR E OCCUPANCY 10070 IA�PERIAL AVENUE NON-SEPARATED USE, NO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REQUIRED. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 LOT AREA: 130'x130' = 16, 900 SQ. FT. PHONE: 408.858.6208 email: yjzou111@yahoo.com PARKING: ON SITE PARKING SPACES ; 30 STUDENTS/6.5+3 = 8 REOD 13 PROVIDED OFF SITE PARKING SPACES = 8(DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF BUILDING) LOCATION MAP � SCALE: 1" = 100'-0" R. 0. S. 469/ 5/ THRU 59 _ � : STEVENS b-CREEK _. - --- --- _ BLVD. - I r s z��ro ��e� ri�cs zasu 2�s�� i o�.e. � i i o^' ; j� 25 i^.5 45 ' 25. .. . � .s J F � �,� � '� n: � � � � � n Ib - � iC �'I(N L,� �' � � ' ss' � - .� r o I� � b ! � • , �, m � � A �, a_ '��. A n m� �, �; m �..�� , � � i:�.�� - � ; : � � � ZN O I,2s� w y �" N�, ,� . � � � nN 01 e.9B6 � . .. .�.+..0 .����.L`_1. Dw , A n� ro m � ic D so �V+ �, � N N � ; W � 0 Z -- N ,-- -- - Y- � � � - - ���3 � A - - -, - m � �` � N - J - V O A �� � I �izs� � °J D a;i; ' m— - .3� .s - - =�- �r�.<.._ �a '�$ � � ^' � '_ !o � "'" € ,N. � _"'_� �Cv V � i� v I� N .O � y � N �� U ^ b �'�' � - — -- T�^3o:��: ��.. � o - _ � ., o��� ,;�� , , � '�� �+ � • - ' - 7 - - � - �----- -- cr o �-: - � O7� � � JC r .N GR.INADA -0 `°., Z � �� n' I� ���� _ r #; o la D ►i� q�o AVE�UE m= � �" '� � a �_.��I�r;� �, r o �,,;-�r _� Ip� .� <" r i5" � f o P - o ... �: ce � r' n,"o �ro "o rn - 4i N � L I" 2s ��IvNS,�l�j N -((w D 3� w_�� �i ' � N F M.582•M•3:''"'"s z�sei u — GRANADA , �� � AVE. N ,�. . > �cea evr�z (\ � � 50 � inr ' ,.;o . )' • �0997 5p �� yri )r, N 3 � _ . �� i , i xl � '. I m o p I � �� � �p m � �u 'I+�� a 3.. i� n o �� IN c" , �vg 'o > I i Ii° g � i .�, p O n Z� b i O. < i � ; � P O ' � � cn � - � ( !) V . � . Z � -__ _. .' .iU - - . p � •�e.......♦.�N I 4 � I� �y j0 _ .\U ,�. . � v � y � � • . . �ii Q i�: " �(� G 3 c � � ��'� � �� ,� ti . 1 .° � r . � �r A: � (V ` ��'�'.�"` . o . i 2f6�6-4d h . i .. 31 �o � N � I ! s . O m ,\ 3 � - . :*� ���Ib, Ut. � , m.� � ,2:6 �13 � e�. D �� � � M\ ° z . r+ , D � 3 i,9.96 j � °' ��� ° b �. I � _3L� _ q ,, .., �j h � . � � T cn �n cc mm oc < < J>N 00 zz a o �� Y� 00 PROJECT SfTE m 0 c� 0 � < a m 0 A z > D D ARUN SHAH 8� ASSOCIATES 39795 PASEO PADRE PARKWAY, FREMONT, CA 94538 (510) 220-4264 (510) 657-4265 FAX �� �F� Z W No. 51343 t�n � pp m �e/�t a O 4 `�'� �RUCn►a�� '� a� au THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON ARE THE PROPERTY OF ARUN SHAH 8 ASSOCIATES AND ARE TO BE HELD IN TRUST AND CONFIDENCE. PUBLICATION, DUPLICATION IN ANY FORM AND DISCLOSURE OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ARUN SHAH & ASSOC�ATES IS PROHIBITED I..L W � Z ~ W � U ;;� V a z W � Z� �/ J � Z W p J � W � � O OU � W � / � a� Q U w O {.L � G � � W � � oV Sheet TITLE SHEET Date Issued For Drawn by ARUN Checked by ARUN Project no. I Sheet � 1. ADDI110NAL SI�1 ONLY REQURED AT VAN A�E SPACES. a v�r wn� �acu ca�ana+s 3. VQtFY 9ff. COLOR� WOftDNG. ETC. MITH iRAFFIC ENq1EERMIG DEPARIMENT ACCESSIBILITY SIGN 1/2" = 1'-0 2�—� RESERVED� `° FOR PICKUP o 8c DROPOFF SIGNAGE w S U � � � � , �� _ , �-o� < �30'-0° ARUN SHAH 8� (E) 6—FT. REDWOOD (N) LANDSCAPE (E) AREA DRNN ASSOCIATES F NCE OVEf�2—FT. — � — T — � � — r� — ri. — r� — r� — — — , � ; — � WALL � �— � ' . a : � � o �� �� o �� , ��o �� � PO BOX 1805 � � � J � � FREMONT, CA 94538 I SIGN, SEE DET. — � (E) PLANTER ^ 3 AT STALLS TO BE ,� (510) 220-4264 � (E) STORAGE BLDG 2�6 MOUNTED MODIFlED TO REMAIN ON FENCE ' (N) LANDSCAPE I o � STRIP W/ TREES J SIMILAR TO � � t O � oo � EXISTING � UN—COVERED PLAY � � � ;::;: . ;:: AREA = 1, 740 SQ. I : ;;:, ;: ;:.: � FT. APPROX. NO _ i � � L SIGN, SEE DET. 2 �, ■�: _i w � _ _ � r■ FIXED PLAY EQUIP. IN THIS AREA 22'-6�' VERIFY IN FIELD (N) FENCE� OUTDOOR PLAY AREA TRUNCATED DOIuES � BY ARMOR—TILE 1 � (N) GATE W/ � PANIC HARDWARE �. � 18'-0" 24'— � _ < (N) LANDSCAPE a PLANTER (N) LIGHT POLE � PER CMC ''' 19.100.050 � � � i � � � o i o� T � � w � 16'-0" 5'-0" � rn ,� ��� S �y F y c+ � z � No. 54345 m DEPRESS CURB & � �v 9e[�c[u � o `� PROVIDE WHEEL �r�srRpCNRr� � I STOP � � �� � � � I THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION ° SET FORTH HEREON ARE THE DEPRESS CURB & PROPERTY OF ARUN SHAH & I PROVIDE WHEEL ASSOCIATES AND ARE TO BE HELD IN TRUST AND CONFIDENCE. PUBLICATION, �, STOP DUPLICATION IN ANY FORM AND � � DISCLOSURE OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN � WRITING BY ARUN SHAH 8 ASSOCIATES I IS PROHIBITED. (N) 6" WIDE M � CONC. CURB ° (E) 6—FT. � REDWOOD (N) TRASH ENCL, � FENCE OVER SEE SHEET A3.3 2—FT• CMU I WALL / � \ � 3'-0" w I z� w � ? U � � �� wo � z� Q� � Z � � Q � Q � U Q z w O � W p a Z 32'-4" J � � � W � O W :�_. i� � Z I�� J � , w �� ov � � Sheet ....,. I (E) LANDSCAPED (E) LANDSCAPED AREA AREA (E) LANDSCAPED AREA 3'-8" � (E) ENTRY GATE TO BE REMOVED �_ 'ld - 'ld - �d - � UTILITY POLES SIGN, SEE � (E) SIDEWALK � � � DET. 2 (E) STREET LIGHT • (E) PLANTER __ _ _ _ ___ _ � (E) CURB & ON—SITE PARKING: GUTTER STANDARD STALLS 12 @ 8'-6"x18'-0" HANDICAPPED 1� 9'-0"x18'-0 SITE PLAN Z � 1/8"=1'-0" SITE PLAN Date I Issued For Drawn by ARUN Checked by ARUN Project no. Sheet no. A1.0 , r—, ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES PO BOX 1805 FREMONT, CA 94538 (510) 220-4264 � ��� �� y y W No. 54345 r�n � FxV 06/�0/17 � a o �'� s �RUCT�R� p�'�� F �, �� Ct#-�LLVVF� T 2 ENLARGED WATER CLOSET PLAN 3/a°=i�-o° 32'-4" BUILDING AREA = 5, 593 SQ. FT. NOTE DIIrENSIONS AND AREA IS APPROXIMATE, BASED ON F1ELD `� MEASUREMENTS FOR GENERAL DESIGN � PURPOSES AND NOT AN ACCURATE SURVEY, NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IWPLIED OR PROVIDED � 15'-9" 31'-6�" 14'-0" i 0 � M � � i in � O I O M 32'-4" � 33'-3%" � 28'-0" 3 FLOOR AREA t /t s"= �'-o" THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON ARE THE PROPERTY OF ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES AND ARE TO BE HELD IN TRUST AND CONFIDENCE. PUBLICATION, DUPLICATION IN ANY FORM AND DISCLOSURE OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES IS PROHIBITED. I..I� W �- �- W � U w C� a Z� Z � � Q W Q J � w � � O OU Sheet � z� w� >° Q� Q U W � � Z � � O W o a o V FLOOR PLAN Date �issued For Drawn by ARUN Checked by ARUN Project no. Sheet no. A2.1 � FLOOR PLAN z 3/�s°=i'—o� /r� n�n�nrr rr1 111l�/Vl 7DI\I ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES 39795 PASEO PADRE PARKWAY, FREMONT, CA 94538 (510) 220-4264 (510) 657-4265 FAX � 4�" ��� S �y � h i W No. 5�343 m � E.p, ro/7o/it z a o �1r lR �CT�I RP QR'� F � ���FO � � � � FRONT ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION �/4"=�'-o" I MASONRY WALL THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON ARE THE PROPERTY OF ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES AND ARE TO BE HELD IN TRUST AND CONFIDENCE. PUBLICATION, DUPLICATION IN ANY FORM AND DISCLOSURE OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ARUN SHAH 8 ASSOCIATES IS PROHIBITED. � W H Z ~ W � Uw C� � Z W — � Z � �/ J Q Z W Q J � W 0 � O OU � z� >° Q� J Q Q U W � � Z � � ow o � oV Sheet BUILDING ELEVATIONS ate Ilssued For 2 REAR ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION �/4"=i'-o" Drawn by ARUN Checked by ARUN Project no. Sheet no. A3.1 ` I � � � (E) BASEMENT I I ' _� � . rr� wnnn Tffl\I � �� � � �� � � (E) BASEMENT � LEFT ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION �/4"=�'-o" 2 RIGHT ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION �/4"=�'-o� (E) MASONRY WALL ON PROPERTY LINE I —� I I (E) MASONRY WALL ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES 39795 PASEO PADRE PARKWAY, FREMONT, CA 94538 (510) 220-4264 (510) 657�265 FAX � a,,� �5" �� S �� fZ c h m V No. 54345 � W C F.�p j�L/I1 p O O `�� SJ '��CN R^ pe`� f � ���FO THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON ARE THE PROPERTY OF ARUN SHAH 8 ASSOCIATES AND ARE TO BE HELD IN TRUST AND CONFIDENCE. PUBLICATION, DUPLICATION IN ANY FORM AND DISCLOSURE OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ARUN SHAH a ASSOCIATES IS PROHIBITED. � W H Z � W � UW V � Z� Z� � � Q Z J � W 0 � O OU � w \ � '^ / Y , Q� Q U W � � z � � o w o� oV Sheet BUILDING ELEVATIONS Date Ilssued For Drawn by ARUN Checked by ARUN Projecl no. Sheet no. A3.2 0 0 z SECTION THRU ENCLOSURE a �� = 1'-0" PROVIDE Y4"THK CAP PLATE WELDED ON TOP Of ALL TS5x5 POSTS TO CREATE WATER-TIGHT CONSTRUCTION. LT. WT. SPLIT-FACE CIAU �SONRY: f'm = 1,500 PSI, GROUT ALL CELL� �NCRETE: f'c = 2,500 PSI BAR: #5 � 24" O.C. VERT, �5 � 24" O.C. f ECIAL INSPECTION NOT REQD. 1. 2. 1'-0 3. 4. SEE SHEET S-1 FOR TYPICAL CONNECTION DETAILS 4 ROOF PLAN �/z" _ �'-o � I 2 °� NOTES: 1. SPLIT FACE CI�U, COLOR TO MATCH (E) BUILDING 2. 6" THICK CONCRETE SLAB WITH �5 � 16" EA. WAY. 3. TURN SLAB DOWN 8" AT PAVING 4. ORNA�IENTAL GATE, SEE SHEET S-3 _ 5. CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT 6. 2" DIA PIPE SLVEEVE TO LOCK GATE IN CLOSED POSITION 7. 16" ROUNDx 4-FT DEEP CONCRETE PIER OF GATE POST 8. GATES TO SWING A MIN. 180 DEG. SEE SHEET S-3 9. CONCRETE EXPANSION JOINT 10. CONCRETE FOOTING SEE DETAIL 11. 3 YD TRASH BIN 4'-5"x6'-9" 12. 2-YD RECY BIN 3'-5Y"x6'-9" 13. PROPERTY LINE, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION TRASH ENCLOSURE NOTES EXCEPT WHILE LOADING DEBRIS INTO CONTAINERS, LIDS TO TRASH CONTAINERS SHALL BE KEPT CLOSED AT ALL TIMES. SIGNAGE SHALL BE INTASLLED CLEARLY IDENTIFYING ALL RECYCLING & SOIID WASTE COLLECTION & LOADING AREAS & �IATERIAL ACCEPTED THEREIN. TRASH & RECYCLING AREAS THAT CONTAIN A HOSE-BIB SHALL DR,41N TO A SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION. OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNION SANITARY DISTRICT FOR SPECIFIC CONNECTION & DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. ORIVEWAYS & TRAVEL AISLES SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL BUILDING CODE REQUIREMETNS FOR GARBAGE COLLECTION ACCESS & CLEARANCE, PROVIDING UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS FOR COLLECTION VEHICLES & THEIR PERSONNEL. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. NOTES: 1. SOLID BOTTOM LINTEL BLOCK TURNED UPSIDE DONM 2. Sx8x16 STANDARD CMU 3. 8x8x16 SPLIT-FACE CMU OFFSET �ACK OF BLOCK Y"BEYOND BACK OF STANDARD CMU BLOCK 4. GATE POST 5. METAL DECK ROOf 6. TSSxS� POSTS 13'-4" � TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN i , i2° _ ,�-o° �� I `J I 2 SIDE ELEVATION �/2" _ ��-o° ARUN SHAH 8� ASSOCIATES 39795 PASEO PADRE PARKWAY, FREMONT, CA 94538 (510)220-4264 (510) 657-4265 FAX S a,•� �Y" �� S �� fZ c y : W No. 5�345 r�n rc E„y, a� �i, A 6 O ` Sl R�CNR��� P f � ���FO THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON ARE THE PROPERTY OF ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES AND ARE TO BE HELD IN TRUST AND CONFIDENCE PUBLICATION, DUPLICATION IN ANY FORM AND DISCLOSURE OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ARUN SHAH & ASSOCIATES IS PROHIBITED. L.L W � Z ~ W � Uw � a Z� Z� L.L Q W Z J O w � � O OU � w� � Ln Q � Q U w O � Z � � O W O a oV Sheet TRASH ENCLOSURE Issued For Drawn by ARUN Checked by ARUN Project no. I Sheet no. A3.3 O I 8'-0 CLEAR OPENING REQD. LOCATE GATE & POSTS AS SUCH � �� /if� �C " ""'•� � �l .'T' aav��� ti '." . I " -��- �cLo��/ $� o i �t �� �° ?� B�ACK WROUGHT IRON FENCE ELEVATION ���� I ro�l � 3 _ � 0 � N N K� Y PLANT LEGEND AND NOTES � Erigeron karvinskiansus/Santa Bazbara Daisy @ 5' oc 1 gallon low water �{ I I I) Nepeta fassinii/Catrnint @ 36" oc 1 gallon low water '`''�L✓ A Cupressus sempervirens/Italian Cypress @ 5' oc 15 gallon low water B Prunus cazoliana Compacta/Cazolina Laurel @ 5' oc 15 gallon low water T-1 Lagestrcemia Tuscorora stdJCrape Myrtle 24" box low water T-2 Ginko biloba (male form) 24" box med water (Proposed Street Tree from City of Cupertino list) 1) Verify placement of new plants around proposed lighting. 2) New plant material to be automatically irrigated with a high e�cient (bubbler and/or drip type application). This shall include a multi-progammable controller, and automatic control valves. Verify watet line access to all planter locations new and proposed. 3) Inscall three inch layer of wood chip mulch at all planting beds. 4) Verify all underground utilities before digging or trenching operations begin. Notify architect if location of proposed trees needs to be adjusted based on potential utility locations. 5) Verify all drainage methods of site. See Architectural or Civil plan. LANDSCAPE AREA Existing Area (along front and side of building) 430 sf. Proposed Area (perimeter parking azea and parking island planters) 710 sf Total Landscape Area: 1140 sf GENERAL NOTES 1) Play azea to have no fixed play equipment 2) Proposed plant spacing based on city screening ordinance and anticipated plant maturity. 3) No drinking fountain is proposed within the outdoor play azea, there is an existing one within the building. 4) No pervious paving is currendy proposed for this site. �m � ■ � . � �■� � �■�■ � _ � ° � � � u� � G � ' o W c �� i S S o " g 'E > • ;. W g ° 000Y _< � � sa : � � '�a;�. � � oE�; gog ; . ; � � ei � :54� � s � � Q T � � � n W � F- z , W � Z � �`-- Z � � W � J _ � W O � � � , � , `Y , ^ � 4 � '-� .�. ����� 1 �i� n ,�� . �uJa4- c�c�o �� o � � „ �s�� JO NO. �' �� L1 i � �� IMPEt�.. A#�#iUE LANDSCAPE PLAN � �v; L�� i ,� . � :: : ..,. �;. �..,: :..� 3 ... .� � . .......<� 4 . ` . , ► � � � � � _---- �' 1�-_- "��,�...- �� "�_..� ��.��, i a � � � � � � � cc� � � � ��::,..<. , ,.w: .. :.:.........: �.:° r ;` i ,. .i. ...�.,..,>� .. . . . . . t Propose to: O-Mei Academy 10070 Imperial Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 By: Elite Energies, Inc. 2576 Alvarado Street, #E San Leandro, Ca 94577 Tel: 510 351-9800; Fax 510 351-9808 � � � � � � OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CUPERTINO CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 -3255 (408) 777 -3308 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • hlanning @cuPerttincwrg PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No: 6 Agenda Date: Tune 14, 2011 Application: DP- 2011 -01, ASA- 2011 -08, TM- 2011 -02 Applicant (s): Terry Brown (Robert Adzich) Property Location: 10216 & 10232 Orange Avenue Application Summary: 1. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT application for two new, 2,697 square foot, two -story single family residences. 2. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL application for two new, 2,697 square foot, two -story single family residences. 3. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP application to subdivide a 0.28 acre parcel into two parcels of 6,000 square foot each. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the following applications per the draft resolutions (Attachments 1, 2 and 3): 1. Development Permit application, DP- 2011 -01 2. Architectural and Site Approval application, ASA- 2011 -08, and 3. Tentative Map application, TM- 2011 -02. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Net Lot Area (after dedication): Acreage (Net): Subdivision Proposed: Building SF: Two Two -story Buildings: FAR: Building Height: Total Parking Proposed: Total Parking Required: Project Consistency with: General Plan: Zoning: Environmental Assessment: Residential (4.4 - 7.7) P (Res) 12,000 square feet .28 acres Two (2) - 6,000 square foot parcels 2,697 square feet 45% 25 feet 7 inches 4 spaces 4 spaces Yes Yes Categorically Exempt per Sections 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and 15315, Minor Land Divisions, of CEQA 101 DP- 2011 -01, ASA- 2011 -08 10216 & 10232 Orange Avenue June 14, 2011 TM- 2011 -02 BACKGROUND: Site Location The project site is currently developed with two residential units. The site is located on the east side of Orange Avenue, north of Olive Avenue, and is surrounded by other apartments/ duplexes on the north, south and the east and by single - family residences to the west. DISCUSSION: Project Description The key highlights of the project are summarized as follows: • Demolition of existing residential units and any accessory structures onsite • Subdivision of the site into two side -by -side street fronting parcels, each approximately 6,000 s.f. • Construction of two new 2,697 s.f. two story single family homes • Parking is provided consistent with the Parking Ordinance - two (2) garage spaces and two (2) driveway spaces General Plan Conformance The project proposes to replace the existing two residential units with two new single family homes. The project is consistent with the General Plan density, which allows a (maximum of four (4) dwelling units on the site based on gross acreage). Neighborhood Subdivision Pattern The applicant is proposing to subdivide the project parcel into two side -by -side lots. Although the width of the new lots is narrow, there is a similar lot pattern in the project neighborhood and in the general Monta Vista residential area. 102 DP- 2011 -01, ASA- 2011 -08 10216 & 10232 Orange Avenue June 14, 2011 TM- 2011 -02 Architectural & Site Design The design of the two homes reflects the architectural variety and interest in the neighborhood. One of the proposed homes is a Craftsman style with a substantial porch fronting the street, siding material, hip roofs, wide eave overhangs, carriage style doors and grouped single hung windows. The other home is a Spanish Mediterranean style with gable roofs, exposed rafter rails at the gable ends, casement windows with grids and arches. The garages of both homes have been setback further from the street than the living area in order to help emphasize the entry and living areas. Landscape Considerations No trees are being removed as part of this application. The existing Oak Tree located along the north property line has been reviewed by the City's Consulting Arborist and deemed to be healthy. As a condition of the project, the Oak tree shall be retained on site and protected from any construction activities. Environmental Assessment This project is categorically exempt from Environmental Review pursuant to Sections 15303, Class 3 ((New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and 15315, Minor Land Divisions, of CEQA. Noticing and Public Input The project has been noticed consistent with the requirements of the Municipal Code. Notices were mailed to property owners within 300 foot of the project site and a legal advertisement was posted in the Cupertino Courier. In addition, site signage with a color perspective of the proposed project has been installed at the site. Staff has not been contacted by any member of the public with regard to this project. CONCLUSION: Staff supports the project because it is consistent with the General Plan density and the zoning. The proposed subdivision pattern, and the residential use of the property, is compatible with surrounding neighborhood. Additionally, the homes are well designed and will complement the neighborhood. Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Associate Planner Reviewed by: /s /Gary Chao Gary Chao City Planner Approved by: /s /Aarti Shrivastava Aarti Shrivastava Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution DP- 2011 -01 2. Draft Resolution ASA- 2011 -08 3. Draft Resolution TM- 2011 -02 4. Plan Set G: � Planning � PDREPORT � pc U reports 2011ureports � U- 2011- 04.docx 103 ATTACHMENT 1 DP- 2011 -01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW 2,697 SQUARE FEET SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT 10216 ORANGE AVE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: DP- 2011 -01 Applicant: Terry Brown Property Owner: Robert or Kathleen Adzich Location: 10216 Orange Avenue (APN: 357 -18 -031) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Development Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: a) The proposed development, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; b) The proposed development will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the City's zoning ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,: The application for a Development Permit, Application no. DP- 2011 -01 is hereby approved and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. DP- 2011 -01 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 104 Resolution No. DP- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and /or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. ASA- 2011 -08 and TM- 2011 -02 shall be applicable to this approval. 3. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Development approval to construct two new two -story 2,697 square foot residences is granted. No allocation from the Monta Vista Area is required or granted since this replaces two existing units on the site. 4. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING PROGRAM The applicant shall participate in the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Program by paying the housing mitigation fees as per the Housing Mitigation Manual. The estimated mitigation fee for this project is $7,941 based on the 2010 -2011 fiscal year rate (If building permits are submitted after June 30, 2011, then the estimated mitigation fee for this project is $8,179 based on the 2011 -2012 fiscal year rate, subject to additional Council approved adjustments or changes). 5. FRONT YARD TREE The applicant shall plant a 24" tree in the front setback area. 6. TREE PROTECTION The development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's consulting arborist to determine that the improvements proposed shall not damage the health of the tree. If the improvements cannot be designed in a manner that shall not damage the health of the tree, the applicant shall obtain appropriate permits and plant appropriate replacements. As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the oak tree to be retained along the north property line. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: • For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. • No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. • No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. • Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four -inch depth. • Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. • Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. • A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report 105 Resolution No. DP- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 7. LANDSCAPE PROTECT SUBMITTAL Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full landscape project submittal per section 14.15.040 of the Landscaping Ordinance. The Water - Efficient Design Checklist (Appendix A of Chapter 14.15), Landscape and Irrigation Design Plans, and Water Budget Calculations shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 8. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include, but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune -up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run -off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscape and irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit." 9. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his /her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the landscape installation report is submitted. a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and water requirements for established landscapes. b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de- thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructions to emission devices. c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be size - adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 10. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 15 feet of any adjacent residential property. 11. CONSTRUCTION HOURS Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays. The developer shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. 106 Resolution No. DP- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 12. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 13. PROTECT AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 14. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET WIDENING Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 2. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 3. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 4. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and /or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 5. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post - development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on -site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. 107 Resolution No. DP- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 7. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: h. Street Tree $ Per current fee schedule ($2,468.00 or 5 %) $ Per current fee schedule ($2,217.00 or 5 %) $ 3,000.00 $ TBD ** $ Per current fee schedule ($3,765.00) $ Per current fee schedule ($2,250.00) By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG &E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off -site and On -site Improvements Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off -site and On -site Improvement On -site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 8. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 9. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 10. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 1: Resolution No. DP- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 11. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and /or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 12. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 13. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading /erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 14. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non - standard appurtenances in the public road right -of -way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 15. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 16. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 17. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 18. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 109 Resolution No. DP- 2011 -01 June 14, 2011 19. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 20. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 21. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. 22. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 23. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY CLEARANCE Provide San Jose Water Company approval before issuance of a building permit approval. 24. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject development. 25. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to issuance of building permits. 26. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG &E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and /or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development Winnie Lee, Chair Planning Commission G: \ Plamihig \ PDREPORT \ RES \ 2011 \ DP- 2011 -01_1 res. doc 110 ATTACHI"tNJ_,? CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW 2,697 SQUARE FEET SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT 10216 ORANGE AVE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA- 2011 -08 Applicant: Terry Brown Property Owner: Robert or Kathleen Adzich Location: 10216 Orange Ave (APN: 357 -18 -031) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria: a) Design harmony between new and existing buildings have been preserved and the materials, textures and colors of new buildings harmonize with adjacent development with design and color schemes, and with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which it is situated. The location, height and materials of hedges and screen planting harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots have been concealed. Ground cover or various types of pavements have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees have been avoided. 111 Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -08 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: June 14, 2011 That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof, the application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA- 2011 -04 is hereby approved, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no.(s) ASA- 2011 -04 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of May 24, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS This approval is based on Exhibits titled "New Single Family Residence, 10216 Orange Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014" consisting of pages A -1 - A -6 and "New Single Family Residence, 10232 Orange Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014" consisting of pages A -7 - A -12 prepared by Bruno Marcelic, Architect A.I.A., dated 5 -26 -2011, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/ property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and /or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. DP- 2011 -01 and TM- 2011 -02 shall be applicable to this approval. 4. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Architectural and Site Approval is granted to for fagade, landscaping, parking lot and sidewalk enhancements, including a new trash enclosure to service an on -site cafe inside a new health club facility located inside the Sears store. The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 5. TREE PROTECTION The development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's consulting arborist to determine that the improvements proposed shall not damage the health of the tree. If the improvements cannot be designed in a manner that shall not damage the health of the tree, the applicant shall obtain appropriate permits and plant appropriate replacements. As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the oak tree to be retained along the north property line. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: • For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. • No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. 112 Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -08 June 14, 2011 • No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. • Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four -inch depth. • Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. • Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. • A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 6. LANDSCAPE PROTECT SUBMITTAL Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full landscape project submittal per section 14.15.040 of the Landscaping Ordinance. The Water - Efficient Design Checklist (Appendix A of Chapter 14.15), Landscape and Irrigation Design Plans, and Water Budget Calculations shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 7. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include, but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune -up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run -off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscape and irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit." 8. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his /her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the landscape installation report is submitted. a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and water requirements for established landscapes. b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de- thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructions to emission devices. c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be size - adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 113 Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -08 June 14, 2011 9. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within feet of any residential property. 10. CONSTRUCTION HOURS Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays. The developer shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. DUST CONTROL The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction for the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site: a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non -toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard; c) Pave, apply water at least three times daily, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. d) Sweep streets daily, or more often if necessary (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets. e) The applicant shall incorporate the City's construction best management practices into the building permit plan set. 13. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/ TREATMENTS Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, material, architectural treatments and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall require a modification approval with neighborhood input. 14. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 15. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of 114 Resolution No. ASA- 2011 -08 June 14, 2011 such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. DP- 2011 -01 and TM- 2011 -02 shall be applicable to this approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development APPROVED: Winnie Lee, Chair Planning Commission G: � Planning � PDREPORT � RES � 2011 ASA- 2011 -08 res. doc 115 ATTACH M"T CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 0.28 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS OF 6,000 SQUARE FEET EACH LOCATED AT 10216 ORANGE AVENUE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM- 2011 -02 Applicant: Terry Brown Property Owner: Robert or Kathleen Adzich Location: 10216 Orange Avenue (APN: 357 -18 -031) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE MAP WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidable injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems. f) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 the application for a Tentative Map, Application no. TM- 2011 -02 is hereby approved, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TM- 2011 -02 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 14, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 116 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -02 June 14, 2011 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: " Two Lot Subdivision for 10216 Orange Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 " dated April, 2010 and consisting of 5 sheets labeled Sheet 1of 3 - 3 of 3 and 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, prepared by Nordic Engineering, Inc. dated April 2011, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. DP- 2011 -01 and ASA- 2011 -08 shall be applicable to this approval. 3. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall demolish and remove all structures on the property. 4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. DP- 2011 -01 and ASA- 2011 -08 shall be applicable to this approval. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/ SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. /s/ Timm Borden Timm Borden, Director of Pulic Works City Engineer CA License 45512 117 Resolution No. TM- 2011 -02 June 14, 2011 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chairperson Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission G: Planning � PDREPORT � RES � 2011 � TM- 2011 -02 res. doc 118 . ABBREVIATIONS & AND L ANGLE � AT CL CENTER LINE O DIAMETER # POUND OR NUMBER AA.P. ATTIC ACCESS PANEL A.B. ANCHOR BOLT A.C. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE A/C AIR CONDITIONING ADJ. ADJUSTABLE A.F.S. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER ALUM. ALUMINUM APPROX. APPROXIMATE ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL ANOD. ANODIZED ASPH. ASPHALT AWG AWNING WINDOW B/ BACK OF OR BOTTOM OF BD. BOARD B.H.A.C.B. BETTER HEATING AND AIRCONDITIONING BUREAU BLDG. BUILDtNG BLKG. BLOCKING BM. BEAM B.O.J. BOTTOM OF JOISTS BOTf. BOTfOM B.U. BUILT-UP C. CARPET CABT. CABINET C.B. CATCH BASIN CEM. CEMENT CNT. CENTER C.T. CERAMIC TILE C.I. CAST IRON C.J. CONSTRUCTION JOINT CLO. CLOSET CLR. CLEAR CLG. CEILING C.M.U. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT C.O. CLEANOUT COL. COLUMN COMP. COMPOSITION CONG CONCRETE CONN. CONNECTION CONST. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CONTINUOUS CONTR. CONTRACTOR CSK. COUNTERSUNK CSMT. CASEMENT WINDOW C.W. COLD WATER D. DRYER DB. DOUBIE D.B. DROPPED BEAM DET. DETAIL D.F. DOUGLAS FIR DH DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW DIM. DIMENSION DR. DOOR D.S. DOWNSPOUT D.W. DISH WASHER DWG. DRAWING DWR. DRAWER EA. EACH E.J. EXPANSION JOINT ELEC. ELECTRICAL ELEV. ELEVATION ENCL. ENCLOSURE E.P.B. ELECTRIC PANEL BOARD EQ. EQUAL EXH. EXHAUST EXP. EXPANSION EXIST. or (E) EXISTING EXT. EXTERIOR FBRGL. FIBERGLASS F.D. FLOOR DRAIN FDN. FOUNDATION F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER F.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.H. FIRE HYDRANT OR FLAT HEAD F.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINET F.F. FiNISH FLOOR F.G. FINISH GRADE FIN. FL. FINISH FLOOR FLUOR. FLUORESCENT FLSG. FLASHING F.O. FINISHED OPENING F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY F.O.S. FACE OF STUD FR. DR. FRENCH DOOR FT. FOOT OR FEET FfG. FOOTING FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC FURR. FURRING FXD. FIXED GA. GAUGE G.D. GARBAGE DISPOSAL GALV. GALVANIZE(D) G.I. GALVANIZED IRON GFI. GROUNDFAULTINTERRUPTER GL. GLASS GRD. GROUND OR GRADE G.S.F. GROSS S�UARE FEET G.S.M. GALVANIZED SHEET METAL GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD H.C. HOLLOW CORE H.D. HOLD DOWN HDR HEADER HDWD. HARDWOOD HDWR. HARDWARE H.M. HOLLOW METAL HORIZ. HORIZONTAL H.P. HIGH POINT HR. HOUR H.B. HOSE BIBB HT. HEIGHT HC. HANDICAP HTG. HEATING HVAC HEATING VENT1LATiNG AND AIR CONDITIONING H.W. HOT WATER H.W.D. HOT WATER DISPENSER I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER INV. INVERT INSUL. INSULATION INT. INTERIOR J.B. JUNCTION BOX JST. JOIST JT. JOINT � Q � � � 0 O N �O N � KIT. KITCHEN K.O. KNOCKOUT K.P. KICKPLATE LAVS. LAVATORIES LAM. LAMINATED LIN. LINEN L.P. LOW POINT LT. LIGHT MAT. MATERIAL MAX. MAXIMUM M.B. MACHINE BOLT MECH. MECHANICAL M.C. MEDICINE CABINET MET. METAL MFR. MANUFACTURER M.H. MANHOLE M�N. MINIMUM MISC. MISCELLANEOUS MTD. MOUNTED MULL. MULLION (N) NEW N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO./# NUMBER N.S.F. NET SQUARE FEET N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE O/ OVER O.C. ON CENTER O.F.S. OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD OH. OVERHEAD OPNG. OPENING OPP. OPPOSITE O.D. OVERFLOW DRAIN a OUTSIDE DIAMETER PA. PUBLIC ADDRESS P.B. PANIC BAR P.C. PRE-CAST P.D.F. POWDER DRNEN FASTENER PL PLATE P/L PROPERTY LINE PLAS. PLASTER PLAS. LAM. PLASTIC LAMINATE PLY. PLYWOOD PNL. PANEL POL. POLISHED PORC. ENAM. PORCELAIN ENAMEL PT POINT P.V.C. POLV VINYL CHLORIDE PR. PPJR R. RISERS R.A. RETURN AIR RAD. RADIUS R.C.P. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RD. ROUND R.D. ROOF DRAIN REC. RECESSED REF. REFRIGERATOR REINF. REINFORCEDANG RES. RESILIENT R.H. ROUND HEAD RM. ROOM R.O. ROUGH OPENING REQ. RE�UIRED R/W RIGHT OF WAY RWD. REDWOOD R.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADER S&P SHELFANDPOLE SCHED. SCHEDULE S.C. SOLID CORE S.D. STORM DRAIN SECT. SECTION S.F. SQUARE FOOT/FEET SGD. SLIDING GLASS DOOR SGW. SLIDING GLASS WINDOW S.H. SINGLE HUNG WINDOW SHT. SHEET SHTHG. SHEATHING SHWR. SHOWER SHVS. SHELVES SIM. SIMILAR SK. SINK OR SKETCH SL. DRS. 5LIDING DOORS S.M. SHEET METAL S.M.S. SHEET METAL SCREW SPECS. SPECIFICATIONS SQ. SQUARE STD. STANDARD STL. STEEL STOR. STORAGE STRUCT. STRUCTURAL ST. STL STAINLESS STEEL SUSP. SUSPENDED SYM. SYMMETRICAL T. TILE T.B. TOWEL BAR T.C. TOP OF CURB TEL. TELEPHONE TEMP. TEMPERED THRESH. THRESHOLD T& G TONGUE AND GROOVE T.O.F. TOP OF FOOTING T.O. TOP OF T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE T.O.S. TOP OF SLAB TOSF TOP OF SUB FLOOR T.P. TOILET PAPER TR. TREAD T.W. TOP OF WALL TYP. TYPICAL U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED UR. URINAL V. VINYL V.C.P. VITREOUS CLAV PIPE VERT. VERTICAL V.G.D.F. VERTICAL GRAIN DOUGLAS FIR W. WINDOW OR WASHER W/ WITH WAINS. WAINSCOT W.C. WATER CLOSET WD. WOOD WDW. WINDOW W/O WITHOUT W.P. WORK POINT or WATERPROOF W.R. WATER RESI5TANT or WASTE RECEPTACLE W.S. WEATHER STRIPPING a WOOD SCREW W.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC XO SLIDING WINDOW WITH "X" BEING OPENABLE AND "O" BEING FIXED WHEN LOOKWG FROM THE OUTSIDE XOX SLIDING WINDOW WITH "X" BEING OPENABLE AND'O' BEING FIXED WHEN LOOKING FROM THE OUTSIDE, DIVIDED ROUGLY 1/4, 1f2, 1/4, RESPECTNELY NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE _ T!' ,'a x DETAIL NUMBER X.X SHEET WHERE DETAIL IS DRAWN. SAME DISCIPLINE U.N.O 10216 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SYMBOLS x SECTION NUMBER x INTERIOR ELEVATION NUMBER X.X SHEET WHERE SECTION IS DRAWN. x�x SHEET WHERE ELEVATION IS DRAWN. SAME DISCIPLINE U.N.O SAME DISCIPLINE U.N.O WINDOW MARK O DOOR MARK Q REVISION NUMBER x (SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE) � (SEE DOOR SCHEDULE) X (SEE DESCRIPTION BLOCK ON SAME SHEET FOR DATE 8 DESCRIPTION) PERSPECTIVE � ELEVATION ABOVE DATUM POINT NORTH ARROW (THIN LINE INDICATES TRUE NORTH) VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE ,._ . ,,.. .,. ... .. ..E . _ t. DRAWING INDEX ARCHITECTURALSHEETS A-1 TITLE SHEET A-2 SITE & AREA PLANS A� BASEMENT & F�RST FLOOR PLANS A< SECOND FLOOR 3 ROOF PLANS A5 ELEVATIONS A� SECTIONS 8 DETAILS A-7 TITLE SHEET A-B SffE & AREA PLANS A-9 BASEMENT 8 FIRST FLOOR PLANS A-10 SECOND FLOOR & ROOF PLANS A-11 ELEVATIONS A-12 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS CIVIL SHEETS TENTATIVE MAP 1 COVER, DETAILS, 8 SECTIONS 2 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS 3 EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY GRADING 1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 2 SECTIONS & DETAILS LANDSCAPE SHEETS L1.0 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN L1.1 HOUSE-1 LANDSCAPE HYDRO-ZONE PLAN L1.2 HOUSE-2 LANDSCAPE HYDRO-ZONE PLAN L2.0 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L3.0 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L3.1 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L4.0 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT DATA FLOOR AREA RATIO: RATIO OF 2ND FLOOR TO 1 ST FLOOR: NUMBER OF STORIES: HEIGHT: BUILDING PAD ELEVATION: CURB ELEVATION: PARKING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: PAVING AREA: LANDSCAPING AREA: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: RECREATION AREA: 2.697/6.000 = .449 1006 S.F. / 1,691 S.F. _ .59 2 25'-T SEE CNIL DRAWINGS SEE CNIL DRAWINGS IN GARAGE - 2 ON DRIVEWAY - 2 TOTAL-4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE P (RES) 4.4 - 7.7 DU/GR AC 1,220 S.F. (20%) 3,089 S.F. (51%) (1) 4-BEDROOM UNIT 1,824 S.F. (30 % ) RESIDENTIAL PROJECT COVER SHEET ASSESOR'D PARCEL NUMBER: 357-18-031 NAME OF OWNER: Robert Adzich PROJECT ADDRESS 10216 Orange Ave, Cupe�tino, CA 95014 CONTACT PERSON: Robert Adzich PHONE: 408-2344835 FAX: NET S�UARE FOOTAGE OF LOT 6,000 S.F. (.138 AC.) SQUARE FOOTAGE MAIN HOUSE: EX�STING: PROPOSED: FIRST FLOOR: 810 S.F. 1,267 S.F. SECOND FLOOR: 1,006 S.F. GARAGE: 400 S.F. 424 S.F. BASEMENT: 1,691 S.F. TOTAL: 1,210 S.F. 4,368 S.F. Are there at least two 10 foot by 20 foot clear spaces inside the garage: Y Is privacy protecbon planting required fa the project? Y Build it Green Total Pdnts: N/A On what floor is work being done? ALL Brief descriptlon of work: DEMOUTIN OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND DETACHED GARAGE. CREATION OF A NEW LOT BY SUBDNIDING WITH A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ATTACHED GARAGE Code Editions: 2010 CBC, 2010 CRC, 2010 CPC, 2010 CMC, 2010 CEC, _ _ __ __ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � , � � � ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10216 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Sheet Name: TITLE SHEET Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn By ,JRg Checked By BM A-1 Scale 12" = 1'-0" � VIEW FROM STREET � i. � a � N _ I� v C O N tG N � FIRST FLOOR AREA A- 11'-4" x 4'-0" = 45 sf B- 29'-0" x 21'-0" = 609 sf C- 33'-0" x 28'-0" = 924 sf D- 20'-8" x 2'-0" = 41 sf E- 14'-6" x 5'-0" = 72 sf TOTAL: 1,691 sf AREA J 12 SF G 0 0 � M � w 0 M (O � o� � � `v (V � � ` � � � � LAND. I � '�--- — � I � � � I I MATERIAL � STAG�NG � AREA � � I �----- 48. O ��N) PLANTER Sl � � — SECOND FLOOR AREA `- CURB,GUTTEK,UKIVtWAY, AND SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARDS,TVP. F- 23'-0" x 16'-9" = 386 sf G- 1'-9" x 3'-5" = 6 sf ORANGE AVENUE H- 18'-6" x 6'-9" = 125 sf J- 2'-0" x 6'-0" = 12 sf SITE NOTES: K- 25'-0" x 15'-3" = 382 sf L- 10 �-0�� X r 'J� - 6 " = 55 sf � SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF THE M- 10 � - 0�� X 4�-O = 40 sf HOUSES FROM PROPERTY LINES. 2. ALL UTILITY SERVICES, INCLUDING TOTAL: 1,006 sf TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC POWER, AND ALL COMMUNICATIONS LINES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE. �- 6 FOOT TlvLL REDWOOD FENCEALONG PROPERTY LINES, TYP. 0 0 � M � � 0 M (� � � � Z NEW GAS METER NEW 250A MAIN ELECTRICAL PANEL WITH UNDERGROUND SERVICE Z 0 � a U � w 0 �, ,� i % BRUNO MARCELIC ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10216 ORANGE AVENUE !'I IDCDTIAI!'1 re Sheet Name: SITE & AREA PLANS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn By ,JRg Checked By BM A-2 scaie As indicated 3 FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM 1/4" = 1'-0" N 00°00'00" W 48.00' � ar�• � � � � � � r � � � ■ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ♦ � ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10216 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 � Q � � v c 0 N t0 � lOVE GRADE _ PUMP, BASEMENT AN[ DUCTS �.,aR FRAMING, THROUGH DROPPED CEILINGS AN SOFFITS. DO NOT PENETRATE FLOOR JOISTS AND BEAMS. A5 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1 /4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR 1/4" = 1'-0" Sheet Name: BASEMENT & FIRST FLOOR PLANS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn By ,JRg Checked By gM A-3 Scale 1/4" = 1'-0" � � � � � � � � . � . � � � � . � � . � � � � � . � • 1/ _' � ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fvc 408/ 379-6110 ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Name: NEW SINGLE � FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10216 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 'CMI" MODEL RVGL50 ROOF VENTILATOR, TYPICAL � , A-5 � SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" Sheet Name: SECOND FLOOR & ROOF PLANS Project Number 1103 �ate 05/26/11 ��� Bv JRB Checked By gM A-4 sca�e 1/4" = 1'-0" � ¢ N � CC � 0 b N � N � . ,. .. . r ..;. ..;. ., �.,,...._.. ���ti � ..�`'y�-"'� ~�,,;f �'�... .�� , .✓- "% - ` "� ` �.. .: . , �, ��. _ _ . . __. _� "�-.. ? , . . . f� ' - � - .� � T �.� . .�..� ,.! � :i� ..� '. .': :-:.:; 3 � � i: ��. � ; ........ ......... � • ... .�..�_...........�..... - .. '.:..:.:' . . .:. , . , , �: �'�:'. � . .., �r : �., .:. ,, . . :: : _ . . :: . . .. . . ; ; , �-'' .: : 1 ,, � i:� � � ���{ . . � � . j'I .i! - ... ..: ...,. . ^.�} ., ..-:.: . . .'.:: .. .,�;.;'., .. ,,..�:. . . . :�`�. . ,:�::�\,. Roof n 20' -�1 LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING BY EAGLE STYIE: CAPISTRANO — SUNRISE BLEND WOOD CORBELS AND TRIM FINISH: BENJAMIN MOORE SILHOUETTE Roof = - - '�- - �` _ .�---�•j - - - 20 _- 0 � ���� ANDERSEN 100 SERIES WINDOWS ; FINISH: DARK BRONZE i . ,� l `1s . �� i ;: : �: .: WINDOW TRIM BY VERISTONE * ' ; �.y � FINISH: VERIFY WRH OWNER __ � � A � - •„ ^-.'` , t ' , � . ... � . ` � w � ' . � . ����� �'`�� $ _ Second Floo^ o ::�....�,...� „ �,,,:��.<..�..�..,�,.�:�<� —� y 11' 0 o : �,. �� .. -' N I ,� � . .. , � ,��� o '?`� ��'. � �`"`. � �� ... �1,.. I .�.—^' � ^-� .�*.�^-^�^—�---�._.. � ,�^ �����` ""'s -- � STUCCO WALL FINISH .--�� � FINISH: BENJAMIN MOORE RATTAN i �",� ;" � � 1 � i �`� � � �" � � ., ' � `�l ��_�I._ �_� ����` . .�. , -n _. i � � �, � �, £ ! WOOD ENTRY DOOR i , � . � . �€ � � f S . � (:�`s � �� � ; FINISH: BEHR WOODCHIP STAIN S� � ` � f � ,I � £` ' �j4 ✓_ 3 �: � s � �� " : � s�, � WOOD ROLL—UP GARAGE DOOR j � ; £ .,� � �� � , ; FINISH: BEHRWOODCHIPSTAIN (� 5 � 3 x = � s x i � ; I £ � , � : ; ; ` � � � ' - - - � First Floor - "� � ��� - - � . � � � . � ... ` : F s; . ;;: � O < - , ..,,.,, < � 5 A� � FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" � � : : Second Floor T � � , _ U . __. . ... _ _ . :. . i ... «...-.«:-.-::: ': -.....- . ... �, � � . . __ :........ � � . . : . �...o...:.».... . . �. ...,..,..3 , . . � . _ ' . ? : S �-----'^ , ��::.' . . 5; � � �: � � y �i �.. J '` . f E ;� � F =: �. �: ! ; ...... . . .....__ � , , --' ;; . �; � _. . _ _.._ ; _ _ r r _.... i - : , y� £ a • -• �� ` s ' ` Fi � � 3 � i � � _� 1 � � : � � � : � , � �. ' _ j _ _ _ First Floor 4 _ � . ' .� ��� i ��:s` � f � I��. �:.:' _ — _ —_ — — 0 3 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION � 1 /4• - � �-0» _ � � COMBUSTION AIR 2-0 COMBUSTION AIR 3 EXHAUST VENT INTAKE VENT A � 4 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION � _ i 1 . � �f�� �� � Roof � _ 20 _ p^ V �' �� N_ Second �Floor_� 11'-0" u T-11' 4 0 _ ' First Floor 0" � � � � � � r � � � i � � � C C . � � � � � i � � � � • � . . . _ 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408! 379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10216 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA Q�l11 d Sheet Name: ELEVATIONS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 ��� Bv JRB/BM Cneckea By gM A-5 Scale 1/4" = 1'-0" 2x STUDS � — 16' O.C., U.N.O PLYWOOD — SHEATHING INSULATION, — SEE SECTIONS GYPSUM — BOARD _ TYPICAL EAVE 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1/2' CDX PLWD. — FASTEN ROOFING MATERIAL PER MFR'S INSUL. BAFFLE RECOMMENDATION ROOFING FELT -- 2x SOLID BLKG. w/RAFTER VENTS PER ROOF PLAN GUTTER COUNTER— FLASHING � ROOF GALV. METAL FRAMING, GUTTER F_ SEE STRUCT. f. 1x6 V—GROOVE FINISH SEE ROOF PLAN BOARDS ON UNDERSIDE OF EAVE I 7/8" STUCCO OVER METAL LATH AND 2—LAYERS BUILDING PAPER ROOFING, SEE PLYWOOD SHEATHING ELEVATIONS $ ROOF FRAMING, SEE STRUCTURNLPLANS ROOFlNG UNDERLAYMENT V—GROOVE SIDING GALV. METAL RAKE FLASHING � I Dc R/S RAKE, SEE ELEVATIONS � �: 2x4 OUTRIGGERS SEE PLANS � 48" O.C. 7/8' STUCCO OVER METAL LATH 8 2—LAYERS � BUILDING PAPER PLYWOOD SHEATHING I Dc STUDS � 16" O.C. � TYPICAL RAKE 1 1/2" = 1'-0" SECTION 1 1/4" = 1'-0" Q � c0 ° 0 N (O � 7/8" STUCI LATH AND BLDG.PAF PLYWOOC Dc STUDS Q 16' O.C. INSULATION WINDOW FLASHING HEADER (SEE STRUCTURAL) SEALANT GYP.BOARD CORNER BEAD L—CASING BEAD WINDOW ' CAULKING 8 TYPICAL WINDOW HEAD 4 TYPICAL WINDOW JAMB 3^ = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" IJV W � �ury IM BOARD TUD ER STUD. SEE :TURAL IW )OD SHEATHING >W FLASHING �,'UCCO OVER METAL LATH AND 2—UIYERS BUILDING PAPER First Floor o ° � B��a__se_m_�ent �^ — 3 SECTION 3 1 /4" = 1'-0" NOTCH EACH RAFTER 1' x 3' AT TOP FOR CROSS VENTILATION — 4 'v CAULKINC sruccoF OVER FO/ WINDOW, SEE ELEVATIONS WOOD STOOL . •I" � WOOD TRIM � :� . �. ,I WINDOW FLASHING OVER � �, BU�LDING PAPER PLYWOOD . -� � GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING `{ INSULATION, SEE , ,�� - c SE�T�oNs ST���o i�� :: . j ,: 9 TYPICAL WINDOW SILL 3" = 1'-0" v t-� � . � First Floor . 0" rrr �� ��� :" �.. .• ��� I��—�� ���: —���—",,.... . � ��—��� ���- — '�-1 I I ::�� ' ��. =: I I I—I I I; I I I � •. I I I I I— -- . . _ I I • .. .'. • '• : , � , .. : . t I I I—I I — — I I I � ' . � ' ��: .� �' �I I I�. I I I— � �.., � �: � � : .. . : ` .. ,�' � I I—I I I- — i I I I � ` � ' ' ' -' ' ' . ': :���: i� • I I I .I I I�. -� � �— � • . ... , : � � .. . � : ,... ; . � . � � �—� � �— Basement — �=�t l — — �t l�tt — _� o' - o• � � � � ���—':.'<. :•:•. .•_`,..�..:_;..:�;...{: :-';.: •. •: -: =:..`..,::'.��'.;�..':.'':_= ��—���_ ; I I I � � � I I I, �, I I 1-1 I I=i i I=1 I I, � i I I I-1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I I �;, I I= I 1-1 I I, � i I I 1=1 I I i �, I i —I I I-1 I I—I I I— I � �— SECTION 4 � 1/4" = 1'-0" � ECTION 2 /4" = 1'-0" Baseme_n� I -10'-0" v _ Roof I 20� - 0., :cond Floor I ���—�� First Floor I 0" Basement I -10' - 0" ROOF TRUSSES NOT SHOWN IN DETAII, SEE STRUCTURAL AND TRUSS MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION INSULATION USED TO SATISFY'COOL ROOF' 2008 ENERGY REQUIREMENT � _ Roof n 20� - �" V Second Floor _ ���� First Floor 0" i BRUNO ; MARCELIC ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10216 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO_ CA Sheet Name: SECTIONS & DETAILS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn BY JRB/BM Checked By BM A-6 scaie As indicated ABBREVIATIONS 8 AND L ANGLE Q AT CL CENTER LINE O DIAMETER # POUND OR NUMBER AA.P. ATTIC ACCESS PANEL A.B. ANCHOR BOLT A.C. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE A/C AIR CONDITIONING ADJ. ADJUSTABLE A.F.S. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER ALUM. ALUMINUM APPROX. APPROXIMATE ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL ANOD. ANODIZED ASPH. ASPHALT AWG AWNING WINDOW B/ BACK OF OR BOTTOM OF BD. BOARD B.H.A.C.B. BETTER HEATING AND AIRCONDITIONING BUREAU BLDG. BUILDING BLKG. BLOCKING BM. BEAM B.O.J. BOTTOM OF JOISTS BOTf. BOTTOM B.U. BUILT-UP C. CARPET CABT. CABINET C.B. CATCH BASIN CEM. CEMENT CNT. CENTER C.T. CERAMIC TILE C.I. CAST IRON C.J. CONSTRUCTION JOINT CLO. CLOSET CLR. CLEAR CLG. CEILING C.M.U. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT C.O. CLEANOUT COL. COLUMN COMP. COMPOSITION CONC. CONCRETE CONN. CONNECTION CONST. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CONTINUOUS CONTR. CONTRACTOR CSK. COUNTERSUNK CSMT. CASEMENT WINDOW C.W. COLD WATER D. DRYER D8. DOUBLE D.B. DROPPED BEAM DET. DETAIL D.F. DOUGLAS FIR DH DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW DIM. DIMENSION DR. DOOR D.S. DOWNSPOUT D.W. DISH WASHER DWG. DRAWING DWR. DR�WER EA. n : - E.J. . ��'�VSIONJOINT ELEC. . . "RICAL ELEV. . - . �, "ION ENCL. - � � . '�SURE E.P.B. . . . ' -tIC PANEI BOARD EQ. . �, EXH. � ,� - EXP. �- � EXIST.or(E) : +�- ��ti- EXT. E �'� �ti��R FBRGL Fi=•� �,-�.. �SS F.D. F .�� ��� � FDN. F� . '.". r - ION F.E. Fi=+: � � "iNGUISHER F.E.C. FI��� � � ' iNGUISHER CABINET F.H. Fla� -��_���ANTORFLATHEAD F.H.C. Fiu� -� . -.-: CA8INET F.F. Fl�i�:�-� '. _>OR F.G. Flr.��- .�,=iqDE FIN. FL. Fihi��� � . "�OR FLUOR. F�.. ��: ; ;ENT FLSG. FL�S-�iv; F.O. FINi��-�= _ ")PENING F.O.C. FA: ? .ONCRETE F.O.F. FAC� :`� � INISH F.O.M. FAC: _�� '+1ASONRY F.O.S. FAC: �`= �TUD FR. DR. FREti".-� :�OOR FT. FOO' '?�+ FEET FTG. FOOTiv_ FRP FIBER�_ASS REINFORCED PLASTIC FURR. FURRING FXD. FIXED GA. GAUGE G.D. GARBAGE DISPOSAL GALV. GALVANIZE(D) G.I. GALVANIZED IRON GFL GROUNDFAULTINTERRUPTER GL. GLASS GRD. GROUND OR GRADE G.S.F. GROSS SQUARE FEET G.S.M. GALVANIZED SHEET METAL GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD H.C. HOLLOW CORE H.D. HOLD DOWN HDR HEADER HDWD. HARDWOOD HDWR. HARDWARE H.M. HOLLOW METAL HORIZ. HORIZONTAL H.P. HIGH POINT HR. HOUR H.B. HOSE BIBB HT. HEIGHT HC. HANDICAP HTG. HEATING HVAC HEATING VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING H.W. HOT WATER H.W.D. HOT WATER DISPENSER I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER INV. INVERT INSUL. INSULATION INT. INTERIOR J.B. JUNCTION BOX JST. JOIST JT. JOINT � Q � N � C O N cD N � KIT. KITCHEN K.O. KNOCKOUT K.P. KICKPLATE LAVS. LAVATORIES LAM. LAMINATED UN. LINEN L.P. LOW POINT LT. LIGHT MAT. MATERIAL MAX. MAXIMUM M.B. MACHINE BOLT MECH. MECHANICAL M.C. MEDICINE CABINET MET. METAL MFR. MANUFACTURER M.H. MANHOLE MIN. MINIMUM MISC. MISCELLANEOUS MTD. MOUNTED MULL. MULLION (N) NEW N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO.Hf NUMBER N.S.F. NET SQUARE FEET N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE O/ OVER O.C. ON CENTER O.F.S. OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD OH. OVERHEAD OPNG. OPENING OPP. OPPOSITE O.D. OVERFLOW DRAIN a OUTSIDE DIAMETER PA. PUBLIC ADDRESS P.B. PANIC BAR P.C. PRE-CAST P.D.F. POWDER DRIVEN FASTENER PL PLATE P/L PROPERTY LINE PLAS. PLASTER PLAS. LAM. PLASTIC LAMINATE PLY. PLYWOOD PNL. PANEL POL. POLISHED PORC. ENAM. PORCELAIN ENAMEI PT POINT P.V.C. POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PR. PAIR R. RISERS R.A. RETURN AIR RAD. RADIUS R.C.P. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RD. ROUND R.D. ROOF DRAIN REC. RECESSED REF. REFRIGERATOR REINF. REINFORCED/ING RES. RESILIENT R.H. ROUND HEAD RM. ROOM R.O. ROUGH OPENING REQ. REQUIRED RNV RIGHT OF WAY RWD. REDWOOD R.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADER S8P SHELF AND POLE SCHED. SCHEDULE S.C. SOLID CORE S.D. STORM DRAIN SECT. SECTION S.F. S�UARE FOOT/FEET SGD. SLIDING GLASS DOOR SGW. SLIDING GLASS WINDOW S.H. SINGLE HUNG WINDOW SHT. SHEET SHTHG. SHEATHING SHWR. SHOWER SHVS. SHELVES SIM. StMILAR SK. SINK OR SKETCH SL. DRS. SLIDING DOORS S.M. SHEET METAL S.M.S. SHEET METAL SCREW SPECS. SPECIFICATIONS S�. SQUARE STD. STANDARD STL. STEEL STOR. STORAGE STRUCT. STRUCTURAL ST. STL STAINLESS STEEL SUSP. SUSPENDED SYM. SYMMETRICAL T. T1LE T.B. TOWEL BAR T.C. TOP OF CURB TEL. TELEPHONE TEMP. TEMPERED THRESH. THRESHOLD T& G TONGUE AND GROOVE T.O.F. TOP OF FOOTING T.O. TOP OF T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE T.O.S. TOP OF SLAB TOSF TOP OF SUB FLOOR T.P. TOILET PAPER TR. TREAD T.W. TOP OF WALL TYP. TYPICAL U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERIMSE NOTED UR. URINAL V. VINYL V.C.P. VITREOUS CLAY PIPE VERT. VERTICAL V.G.D.F. VERTICAL GRAIN DOUGLAS FIR W. WINDOW OR WASHER wi wmi WAINS. WAINSCOT W.C. WATER CLOSET WD. WOOD WDW. WINDOW W/O WITHOUT W.P. WORK POINT or WATERPROOF W.R. WATER RESISTANT a WASTE RECEPTACLE W.S. WEATHER STRIPPING a WOOD SCREW W.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC XO SLIDING WINDOW WITH'X' BEING OPENABLE AND "O' BEING FIXED WHEN LOOKING FROM THE OUTSIDE XOX SLIDING WINDOW WITH'X" BEING OPENABLE AND "O" BEING FIXED WHEN LOOKING FROM THE OUTSIDE, DNIDED ROUGLY 1/4, 1/2, 1/4, RESPECTNELY NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 10232 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SYMBOLS X DETAIL NUMBER X.X SHEET WHERE DETAIL IS DRAWN. SAME DISCIPLINE U.N.O O WINDOW MARK X (SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE) x SECTION NUMBER X.X SHEET WHERE SECTION IS DRANM. SAME DISCIPLINE U.N.O DOOR MARK O (SEE DOOR SCHEDULE) X INTERIOR ELEVATION NUMBER X.X SHEET WHERE ELEVATION IS DRAWN. SAME DISCIPLINE U.N.O Q REVISION NUMBER X (SEE DESCR�PTION BLOCK ON SAME SHEET FOR DATE & DESCRIPTION) � ELEVATION ABOVE DATUM POINT NORTH ARROW (THIN LINE INDICATES TRUE NORTH) PERSPECTIVE � VIEW FROM STREET VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE ` s . : . - , ,s <,.;�: DRAWING INDEX ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS A-1 TITLE SHEET A-2 SITE & AREA PLANS A-3 BASEMENT 8 FIRST FLOOR PLANS A� SECOND FLOOR 8 ROOF PLANS A-5 ELEVATIONS A-6 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS A-7 TITLE SHEET A-8 SfTE 8 AREA PLANS A-9 BASEMENT & FIRST FLOOR PLANS A-10 SECOND FLOOR & ROOF PLANS A-11 ELEVATIONS A-12 SECTIONS 8 DETAILS CIVIL SHEETS TENTATIVE MAP 1 COVER, DETAILS. 8 SECTIONS 2 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS 3 EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY GRADING 1 GRADING S DRAINAGE PLAN 2 SECTIONS & DETAILS LANDSCAPE SHEETS L1.0 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN L1.1 HOUSE-1 LANDSCAPE HYDRO-ZONE PLAN L1.2 HOUSE-2 LANDSCAPE HYDRO-ZONE PLAN L2.0 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L3.0 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L3.1 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L4.0 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS P ROJ E CT DATA FLOOR AREA RATIO: RATIO OF 2ND FLOOR TO 1 ST FLOOR: NUMBER OF STORIES: HEIGHT: BUILDING PAD ELEVATION: CURB ELEVATION: PARKING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: ZONING: GENERAL PIAN DESIGNATION: PAVING AREA: LANDSCAPING AREA: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: RECREATION AREA: 2.697/6,000 = .449 1006 S.F. / 1,691 S.F. _ .59 2 24'-8' SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS IN GARAGE - 2 ON DRNEWAY - 2 TOTAL-4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE P(RES) 4.4 - 7.7 DU/GR AC 1,220 S.F. (20%) 3,089 S.F. (51%) (1) 4BEDROOM UNIT 1,824 S.F. (30%) RESIDENTIAL PROJECT COVER SHEET ASSESOR'D PARCEL NUMBER: 357-18-031 NAME OF OWNER: Robert Adzich PROJECT ADDRESS 10232 Orange Ave, Cuperbno, CA 95014 CONTACT PERSON: Robert Adzich PHONE: 408-234d8.'i5 FAX: NET SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LOT 6,000 S.F. (.138 AC.) SQUARE FOOTAGE MAIN HOUSE: EXISTING: PROPOSED: FIRST FLOOR: 810 S.F. 1.267 S.F. SECOND FLOOR: 1,006 S.F. GARAGE: 400 S.F. 424 S.F. BASEMENT: 1,691 S.F. TOTAL: 1,210 S.F. 4,388 S.F. Are there at least two 10 foot by 20 foot clear spaces inside the garage: Y Is privacy protectlon planting required for the projeci? Y Build it Green Total Pdnts: N/A On what floor is work being done? ALL Bnef description of wak: DEMOLITIN OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND DETACHED GARAGE. CREATION OF A NEW LOT BY SUBDNIDING WITH A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ATTACHED GARAGE Code Editions: 2010 CBC, 2010 CRC, 2010 CPC, 2010 CMC, 2010 CEC, � - � = - - __ __ __ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • , � � ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10232 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Sheet Name: TITLE SHEET Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn BY JRB Checked By BM A-7 Sca�e 12" = 1'-0" � a 0 c� O O N � N � I AF f SECOND FLOOR AREA F- 23'-0" x 16'-9" = 386 sf G- 1'-9" x 3'-5" = 6 sf H- 18'-6" x 6'-9" = 125 sf J- 2'-0" x 6'-0" = 12 sf K- 25'-0" x 15'-3" = 382 sf L- 10'-0" x 5'-6" = 55 sf M- 10'-0" x 4'-0" = 40 sf TOTAL: 1,006 sf 3ECOND FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM �ia° _ �'-o° �REA J 12 SF FIRST FLOOR AREA A- 11'-4" x 4'-0" = 45 sf B- 29'-0" x 21'-0" = 609 sf C- 33'-0" x 28'-0" = 924 sf D- 20'-8" x 2'-0" = 41 sf E- 14'-6" x 5'-0" = 72 sf TOTAL: 1,691 sf 2 FIRST FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM � ia~ _ � �-o" N 00°00'00" W 48.00' 6 FOOT TALL REDWOOD FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINES, TYP. � O O � M � � 0 co io � � � Z 0 v 4 N 4 �i Q i� M NEW GAS METER NEW 250A MAIN ELECTRICAL LANDSCAPING zs�-0• i r-a• � r�• PORCH O O � M � w 0 c� Zc � 0 � � II . �� ' �� �� ' �� � �� � . � � � � � � � � � ,, � 11 � ' `�1�11� � . � �i 11111 ! IIIII" , � , � � , , � � � • - ' I Y � � � PANEL WITH �� ' UNDERGROUND � 4 I SERVICE '° o � PORCH � ^ � � � � DRIVEWAY LANDS. I WALKWAY I �------- ---� 1 4 N ' 14��. I Zp��• I I I 4 35'-0' � ( � m I � I I� � MATERIAI I ' ' � SAREAG I ' � LANDSCAPING I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � z � �------------� � ------------ -- — 9 a ° o (N) SIDEWALK w 0 � (N) PLANTER STRIP' � � � � � � � � S 00°00'00" W 48.00' CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, AND 51DEWALK PER CIT`/ STANDARDS,TYP. ORANGE AVENUE SITENOTES: ---------- 1. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF THE HOUSES FROM PROPERTY LINES. 2. ALL UTILITY SERVICES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC POWER, AND ALL COMMUNICATIONS LINES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CABLE N TELEVISION SERVICE. � SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" / / BRUNO MARCELIC ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10232 ORANGE AVENUE Sheet Name: SITE & AREA PLANS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn BY JRB Checked By gM A-8 scaie As indicated � ¢ N M 0 0 � m N � sr-0• a�-0• � r�• � r�• a,-o• °' 2 5 q A-12 , -------------- ----- ' d A-12 a ' WINE �4 3�-2� TASTING °i c�R. AREA � . �i � 3�_2• 4 � � � CLR. 4 0 �� ------ STEPPED _ _ _ _ WALL Q ____ 4 � � � � `V ------ N W �. � ____Z r _ N � � BASEMENT - �+�� � � � 9'-0" CLG. j o STORM DRAIN � 4 CATCH BASIN $ NOTE: INSTALL 5/8' `"� SUMP PUMP, TypE-X GYPSUM SEE DETAIL 80ARD ON ENTIRE � B/A-7.0 8 CIVIL CEILING IN BASEMENT 3 � DRAWINGS °� A-12 _ � DN 1R N 7.5' MNX. � UP : � = a � a J � w a� - " 4. � ~ O � J �i � 1 I � UP 16R a A-12 � � i i � T=10.5' MIN. P w i i � � STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN, � � � i " � � CONNECT TO CATCH BASIN & a o � 8'-0" CLG. �DN t w ,°�° � SUMP PUMP AT OTHER LIGHT i i i i i i i 4'�" WELL, SEE CNIL DRAWINGS 7.5" MAX. 3 i i i i i i i � i i i i i i i = i i i i i i i � i i i i i i i LINE OF SOFFIT ABOVE TEMP. J ' --------------------------------------- .. . . --------------------------------------- • v 4 ,�, � - ° Y z�-o• ❑ N Z , A , �: s'+owER � CLOSET BATH �= � 3'�• s'-e" ;� GAME ROOM ; 8 ��� O� 00 8'�' CLG. CLG. Z i� O JILL •' l 4 �N �, � ° � N � DRAIN WITH SUMP PUMP . MECHANICAL / � STORAGE " 8'-0' CLG. LISTED 2WYIINUTE FIRE RATED, SELF-CLOSING, DOOR ASSEMBLY WITH AIR-TIGHT GASKETING SANITARY SEWAGE PUMP, SEE DETAIL &A-7.0 AIR INTAKE � FROM ABOVE . , GRADE ' — FURNACE SERVES BA5EMENT AND FIR5T FLOOR, RUN DUCTS UNDERNEATH FLOOR FRAMING, THROUGH � DROPPED CEILINGS AND SOFFITS. DO NOT PENETRATE 4 N _ LL � 0 FLOOR JOISTS AND BEAMS. "' (N ��e ' ' EXHAUST FROM 14'�' 20'-6" 2'-0" ABOVE GRADE 3T-0" A-11 A-11 2 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1 /4" = 1'-0" � FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" i BRUNO MARCELIC ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10232 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA Sheet Name: BASEMENT & FIRST FLOOR PLANS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn BY JRB Checked By gM A-9 Scale 1/4" = 1'-0" A-11 � � � � � � r � � � �- � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • ♦ ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 'CMI' MODEL RVGL50 ROOF VENTILATOR, rraicA� � 200F PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" � SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 10232 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Sheet Name: SECOND FLOOR & ROOF PLANS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn BY JRB Checked By BM A-10 sca�e 1 /4" = 1'-0" �, . , . —.� ., ,. � . � .�-� , , ... �-_ ` ; ,.. .�-.: -. . : ; � � _ + ?,...�'� .".^^^m.m^..'M" � t �---�.�_,.. _. �� - � � � r--�--m� .. �= z � r : ��:"T '�� --�� ' . . � ' -- .:..... � � � - � v . r-----� ." -' � .. .. �;.. . : . . � ..�.. ��' ,.,.��� . , � « • <, 1. , � - -- --:: ... : _ , _r _ . �:�.. .. - - -- ._ - ::::::.... _ , � �� . , j: - ��--.. Secon�d Floor_,� _ 11'-0" u �;-. � "_• ..�._ Roof � _ p�^ � 50 VEAR PRESIDENTIAL TL COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING BY CERTAINTEED -.' J^l '` 1 - STYLE: WEATHERED WOOD �.� „/" � -..,, ANDERSEN 100 SERIES VINYL WINDOWS � - " FINISH: WHITE ' x ~`^` ` ✓„ ` � — — — ROOf ` c�.�....M::�c...�... . ....�:,., � .,..;,.s�.,.,..,.. 2 �� - �� :»>„..�...,w.., ....:.... ': ....:...,. .:., ' ` -: :.�..._.M. '" .w..., � • < ���•�" . "' ' • ' ` 4' HORIZ. FIBRE-CEMENT SIDING .. -� ,.._.__„�......., .._ ��� - ..... , FINISH. BENJAMIN MOORE WEIMERANER . . .. ..... � } .. : ...... ... � ... . _ i �# , _ �{ : � �; _ , FIBRECEMENT WINDOW TRIM -- �� ' � ' � - ' FINISH: BENJAMIN MOORE MASCARPONE T ......, ,. } 1 � ; � I � t � � CRAFTSMAN STYLE PAINTED & INSULATED } _..--- `--._ _ , ; � ,,, ,; . � — - WOOD ROLL-UP GARAGE DOOR , � ; �. ,. _...., . .: s,a�,;� . ;. . , . ,,,.,,> ; -- -. FINISH: BEHR CHATHAM FOG STAIN :.. �.... . ..... ..: .w..vS . ... :.::'. "� � S econd Floor ,,, � K _ n , .. N � ��; � 11 0 .�� g ".` ' ' ,� .,,,. ..., �-� , � < „ � 8 „ _._..... � • �.-_-.-..'..M" �� ... , �- - ` rs��r�.�n....... <. . . i: .. ':. . ......1 ..... . ........t.......... ! .. �' � ,_, . � ,-,.,,, ��-� ' . :::, .. �.�:::..-,,,.,,_ ........� .... .w ; . , ,_,,:..m :�.�,, m, ....M, BRE ; ; . .. ' .,..- ,. ' 8" HORIZONTAL FI - ..._:, ._ . .. �'� � � , , WEIMERANER IN MOORE CEMENT SIDING . � ; �1 `' � 3 �- .. - �-t�-��-~� � _ , - > -- � -- - q .... ___..� � i �'� I i � , _ ...... o ;; � ,:.,,. �. - >' f ' } .. . s € ,: _ . � i : � , M RN EL DORADO ' ' ' n I � ' STYLE SANTA FE STACKED , � ; , _ . � ', 5'-2 1!2" ` £ � : ; � � ' � � i � � - � _ �. � , , ... . . ,... ., � � ; � � , `t � � � ; Fir st Floor � — — — � � - 0 .. : ., , _.. ,-__,, , �.,.... � WOOD ENTRY DOOR FINISH: BEHR CHATHAM FOG STAIN � FRONT ELEVATION 1 /4" = 1'-0" .................. .. � .... � . �__ � ......_ ,. _ r �--_.. ...,.. . �~-~ I . .' ; � � ..,, _ � � . I : � _... 4 . � : � .... ....... .... ...... _ ,. IR „ . .. .. .. ....... , : ; ; € ` N VEN N A ,,..,., . � �. .. , m _, j i � ' : , � __ , _. _ EXHAUSTVENT , : ._ ,, : , ; ; ..:.....,...�..,�..:... .. E ::: ,._.._�.,M.�� .... ....... '��: ..: :....� i .... ............ ............................ . . t I f . .. F ,L"": h- .. . ...... ... ..... .... ... „ � .: j ,�. .. E � ... . . .... ... ... .� : -��;...... .... � € '�;. .� E .. . � � � , � .... ... .. . ... ,\ . � . , E ' � _ ; � j . � ,. . ' �� ,.� �: _ _. .... _. _ First FIOOr ,.,,..,.,_m..,.. :; _ . � ' ... — —_ — — _ ..; ` ::: ,, _ .. �-- - r � � : : _ - . . � o • ....... , .. _ _ , _ — - _ _ !i _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 3 A �Z 6' TALL REDWOOD FENCE I 2�_0' I_ 2'-0" , �T SIDE ELEVATION = 1'-0" � '� �� . _ . . ���� _.,," .'.' . .. . .. • : . 4 _ . .: , : ^+—y ' �. ��� ,.. - ~- _ R�oof . . ' • _ .. ., -._-..., mT..._��.,. r.,,� m,�.r.,... _m ... ............... .. ~.� ..._ ; 2�� - 0" V .�. �, ,., �_.� �._, � —�, . : �— , ,,,� , , . £ ; ..��_ ` : —� . ... . .. .. . : .�. E .,,:., 'r------�� .. .. ... .. , ,: . '�. . „ ..s : .. .. ' ... .: � � �� .. .. � �. . ` � . � ,. � , ... ... ..: ._ < _ _ . � �.. _ , ; ,t�; ; � �� .- .r .: � . - _ � . ,,. . _ : " . , � �_ � N � O N � N � � .�-'�s� ����� . ---w ��.. � � , �,, � , Roof 20� - o~ � l � Second Floor J � 11'-0" ; , .. - .� 3. 'w^ � .'^e�� N ; � � : ..., � � ��. , �� : ..... .. ........ . _, . � ��-��. .: , � � : 5 ' ..:: : � . . : . : � �: ... ,� .�. .,._ ......... < { : i ..�_. .......... ; . ; : ; :- : _ ; �: : � i i : :; :: ,..� � ....... • �:: . :: :: .; � 5 � �. . : � : :_ 8 I ,...; � s �.. �;: � .,.., ' 1 .......... - � ' � ;: ; . . � ....... h ::.--: � �.�.' , � ; o � I ; ; , �---� -.._� _....� � ; : ' ° ' � ` � � � ;� ; ; � ;. . , , �: : � ; � ; s , ; , ; F �: , , � . E : �. : ' ..._.. I. � . � .....! . ,...:.._ � .. i i ;.... _ � ' First Floor : ? . — _ --�- . .+:. i — ; — 0 ., Second Floor '� 11' - 0" 5 J ' A-12 ¢3 _._ _ � ,� ,.. _ ; REAR ELEVATION ,...:..,. , ; - ��.;.......:...�..., � 1 /4 = 1 -0 .. . I . - � � �� I , , n ; • : � . ' , � ; �� � i }� E � f _ ; . �: , .. ., . : , : � -.. , � .au � ; . . , , . ....... ;.. . � . �'�" ��' , . � „,, � ....... ... ..... ......... :: . ' i � a ... `S, c � ��..: 3 � � ? ; �� e T e ...... .... .......... � . » : �.. , . > ..... ... ,.. ,, :. ... , � �: ; �-.: a " l � i 8 ; � � � & , �:: �: :i ::. ., . � �; . � , , . :.. ..:::, .. . . . , . a ;. :, ; � . , i � ��. , � : : , _: > s ' , :. ,:; , , g : , t : v , ; , — — a f , ., _ . .-- - . .._.. ...—... _ ' . —i ' � ._ — _ , s ; .. .. , .... . �. . . .. � . � -.-_ .... . . f � First Floo�r , � . .: r _ - � ..._... � .. :. .• ,,... ..:.� . .� .. . . .. . . ... .. . ::. -.�:� •�� ��� ,.. .. ::. � .�: . ... .... . �.... ... ::. . .;. ..::. .._,..:. " <_. .._,_... . ......... . . . ... . . ; � ... ,. ,...: RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION s� rn�� REOw000 FeNCe ' 4 � ie. _ � � � � � � � � r � � � ■ � � � � � � � � � I � � , / 1 � • � . . 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/ 379-6500 Fax 408/ 379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10232 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 9.r,M d Sheet Name: ELEVATIONS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn By �Rg Cnecked By gM A-11 Sca�e 1 /4" = 1'-0" � O � M 0 O � c0 � 2x STUDS � — 16' O.C., U.N.O PLYWOOD — SHEATHING INSULATION, — SEE SECTIONS GVPSUM — BOARD _ NPICAL EAVE 1 1 /2" = 1'-0" ROOF FRAMING, SEE STRUCTURAL FASTEN ROOFING 1/2' CDX PLWD. MATERIAL PER MFR'S RECOMMENDATION INSULATION BAFFLE ROOFING FELT 2x SOLID BLKG. w/RAFfER VENTS PER ROOF PLAN 1 1 x TRIM / GUTTER COUNTER- FLASHING , GALV. METAL GUTTER SEE ROOF PLAN �� V-GROOVE FINISH BOARDS ON UNDERSIDE OF EAVE HORRONTAL SIDING o/ ^ 2-LAYERS BLDG. PAPER, ' \ SEE ELEVATIONS PLYWOOD SHEATHING ROOFING, SEE ELEVATIONS & ROOF FRAMING, SEE STRUCTURALPLANS 30LB.FELT V-GROOVE SIDING GALV. METAL RAKE FLASHING 2x R/S RAKE, SEE ELEVATIONS 2x4 OUTRIGGERS SEE PLANS (t� 48" O.C. HORIZONTAL SIDING o/ 2-LAYERS BLDG. PAPER, SEE ELEVATIONS PLYWOOD SHEATHING 7�c STUDS Q 16" O.C. � TYPICAL RAKE 1 1/2" = 1'-0" fION 1 = 1'-0" R-13 INSULATION SIDING OVER LAP BUILDING GYPSUM BOARD BUILDING PAPER PAPER OVER (SEE ELEVATIONS) METAL FLASHING KING STUD (SEE STRUCTURAL) 1/4" REDWOOD Dc STUDS Q 16' O.C. STARTER TRIMMER STUD � INSULATION (SEE STRUCTURAL) 24 GA. GALV. METAL FLASHING WINDOW PLYWOOD SHEATHING HEADER(SEE Dc6 TR�M STRUCTURAL) PLYWOOD SHEATHING GYP.BOARD 2x6 TRIM CORNER BEAD SEALANT CAULI4NG L-CASING BEAD yy�Nppyy W�NDOW FLASHING � CAULIONG SIDING OVER BUILDING PAPER (SEE ELEVATIONS) 8 TYPICAL WiNDOW HEAD 4 TYPICAL WINDOW JAMB n SE� 3 " = 1'-0" • CAULKING 2x3 TRIM, SI 2x6 TRIM, BI PLYWOOD : CAULKING SIDING OVE BUILDING P (SEE ELEVP TYPICAL WINDOW 3 ._���. WINDOW WOOD STOOL WOOD TRIM WINDOW FLASHING OVER BUILDING PAPER GYPSUM BOARD R-13 INSULATION First Floor 0 " Bas�ement � -10' - 0"� 5 SECTION 4 � �t� � �� 1/4. _ ���� � r1 L J � r1 LJ \, % BRUNO MARCELIC ARCHITECT A.I.A. 365 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008-2013 Phone 408/379-6500 Fax 408/379-6110 Project Name: NEW SINGLE FAM I LY RESIDENCE 10232 ORANGE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA Sheet Name: SECTIONS & DETAILS Project Number 1103 Date 05/26/11 Drawn By ,JRg Checked By BM A-12 scaie As indicated z z a � STEVENS CREEK GRANADA GRANA A HERAAOSA LOMITA LOMITA ALMADEN LI a a 0 SITE a Z a m w w ¢ � c� Q ° � m N W o a f BLVD. o N > J m Q N z Q w 0 N VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT INFORMATION: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 10216 & 10232 Orange Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 APN: 357-18-031 PROPERTY OWNER: Four Point Holdings, LLC 10164 Carmen Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Robert Adzich Managing Member PROJECT ENGINEER: MARIUS E. NELSEN, R.C.E. 20597, EXP. 9/11 NORDIC ENGINEERING 21801 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD, STE. 8 CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA, 95014 TEL. (408) 257-6452 FAX: (408) 257-6821 nordicengineers�yyahoo.com Q EXISTING LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIOENCE PROPOSED LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 PROJECT AREA: 12,000 S.F., 0.28 AC. UTILITIES: ELECTRIC AND GAS, P.G. & E. WATER: SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY TELEPHONE: ATT SEWER: CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT x' � CHRISTY U21 WITH LIGHT DUTY CAST IRON GRATE 19, MIN. _ _ 1% MIN _ ' i_. ' _- ;. _ ' Z � N ;� 3/4" DRAIN ROCK 15 L.F. 24" H.D.P.E. PIPE OVERFLOW TO FUTURE STORM DRAIN IN ORANGE AVE. Y ' 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE PERCULATION PIT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE , Y J Q � W N ln � � N Z p O S = � w J � � �Z � � � � � o F.F.=344.40' � DRIVEWAY GARAGE a � a SLAB _.. _ _. _..._... __... _...__ _. _. _ ...... ........_.. _..._ ,. _._... _ ..........._._.. EXISTING GRADE 344 ___ _ .. S �01 _ __...... 344 ' I ' � ' 340 � _ ' ' I BASEMENT ' ' F.F.=334.40' 336. . ! , __.... _ _ ,. ___......... _ ,. cp: c0� <O �: M a��. �(1 c0: �O 0���. Of: O�: 00 N N� N N N N- N N N N. � �� � � 7� d� d: a �: � � � d�� d d: d M. M� � M�� M- M'1�- M M: M M�� �''� M_ M �+�� �+2� �+4� 0+6� �+8� �+�� �+20 SECTION A-A, LOT 1 � SCALE: HORIZONTAL: 1"=10' � w VERTICAL: 1"=4' 0 ~ N Z N N � � o } o 0 '�' w 3 � x x � z � � J �n 41 F.F.=344.65' a o � � DRIVEWAY GARAGE � � a SLAB ; 340 FINISH GRADE , ! 336 __ , n. �. M M 1+40 _ l i EXISTING GRADE � S=o.a, 344 ' ! ',344 I I ' I ' , ' ' , 340 I __._ . _. _.. _ _..... _.._... _ 340 FINISH GRADE BASEMENT ', ', F. F:= 334.65 I I 336 ' _ _ . > _...._ _, _. 336 M]. M�.�........ .. M ......... ���. ......... ^_...... ���.�...... �. ... �: ... . �... .. ���.. ........ . M:..... ���., .. ....... �.. . . .... �..... . ... M ... .. . �. r���. M- M��� N���. N: M��. N� N-. N: N N: N: N�� N N��. ��.. a' �: � a v a a a: t a a: � a � v M��. M: M� M��. M: M���. r7. M: r���. M� M: r'1- M��. M��. M��.. .. 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 SECTION B-B, LOT 2 SCALE: HORIZONTAL: 1"=10' VERTICAL: 1 "=4' � �� � � � 4� H� �� 0 �� �� �1, F " 0 z a I �; �c dRllCE A. � � , � W7L I � REVISIONS � � o - U � c � .�',o v �„ .., � m U � � - .�, m o ' .�- � U (: C � � � ° � � C � x � � m � mJ d �'-� y C . � . :,, � .�_ � � yW' C • � _ :: W � � `` � � � ti�° �� . rn �o -o i ' � j T O m - Z• � �. U � _ � O � � � �� z, ¢ - W- i) I _ Z� z ^ w � � Q LJ.J � � w �J.� I V J W / � O z U W � / O � /r L� �L � � �..I..� Q Q C' U �z w � O � O Z � ~ Q � � I..._ � L1.J Z N � wo� I— � U te: APRIL 2011 ale: 1 "= 10' �wn: CAD Sheet 1 � of � Sheets . ,•,�.� i i GARAGE FF= 344.07' (AT REAR) 5=0.01 � . . .�x.�e � . �---- z5.00' � J� ■ v; - ■ ssa.: � � �' ssa.� ~ saz.e�e . EG=343.36 FL=343.0 TC=343.36 � BEGIN SWALE HIGH POINT 15.00' 30 0' -� � : JOINT � UTILITY ��$5 �"{"JOINT POLE � �TILITY ■ s4.�s.,z POLE ss s.7s „ • ..�$ , PG&E PG&E VAULT ��] 4t8 GV PG&E / � �b,�s.so SERVICE J eox � I SIDEWALK TYP. SURFACE BIO-SWALE : FG=341.39 �0"W 135.0� � _ _ _ • �� 41.39 00 _ � , ,� �; - ¶ ■ sei ,g"'v�s�yq� . ■ 3a5.at � �f � � � � � 2 FG= 343.4 I � GHTWELL � 1 ��� ,,,fff ■ :i;.�a I■ �<s.sx NEW RESIDENCE LOT j I /, PERCULATION FF=344.40' PIT BASEMENT NET AREA: , � GRATE=341.2 0 FF=334.40' 6,000 S.F. � O �I ■ aa: a7 0.14 AC. ■ .}t2.75 ■ 38I-n1 ■ 3A`•.95 I ' ■ 341.85 � /( ��" 20.00' � BUILDING LIGHTWELL � /p SETBACK ■ 3,i.e, � 2 FG=343.4 � I `'':fls I �... ....._ �1 • 34�.e7 a O _ - _..._. _ _ � 3Y2.00 - _ I O � � � ll „ BIO-SWALE . � � "�� BLD. SETBACK � FG=342.0( ■�+�+• � �G=342.0( Sal. , _ -----. _ __ .._..... _._.. - rza:.lb J - -�".. r ga2.xl 3 FG=343.65 B/a�� ( o �- k 'A�f ° 25 O L✓ LIGHTWELL 2 � a .�.z.� � LOT 2 � � z r st2.37 NEW RESIDENCE NET AREA: PERCULATION FF=344.65' ... 6,000 S.F. � PIT BASEMENT 0.14 AC. � � GRATE=341.3 ° FF=334.65' �( � � ■ 3e2.a9 ■ 3a2.50 r 3s;i.Yt I � / � 20.00' Q' BUILDING� �� UGHTWELL i I SETBACK ' F = 4 . ��� °--- -- --�--� -----.. . - - - ` - - -� � I ■ aaa.sa � 125.00' •� =" - S89'S6'30"E 135.00' �•92� � SIDEWALK BLDG. FG=342.45 TYP. SETBACK EG=342.45 LEGEND: - - PROPERTY LINE . �z.a� SPOT ELEVATION E. GRADE � DRAINAGE, DIRECTION OF FLOW APN: 357-18-031 (LOTS 1 & 2) GROSS AREA: 12,960 S.F. 0.30 AC. NET AREA: 12, 000 S. F. 0.28 AC. NOTES 1Q SEE DRYWELL DETAII, STORM WATER OVERFLOW TO DRAIN INTO FUTURE STORM DRAIN IN ORANGE AVE. Q2 LIGHTWELL DRAINS TO DRAIN TO PUMP SYSTEM, SEE GRADING PLAN. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, BASEMENT WALL DETAILS, ETC. I REVISIONS N N � o -- Of U - cY, N, C ^+ � W � a U .n � - � � .v _ � 3 c s: � � C N rn -J .* � ° � _. _ . . � .� C � X � O) J p�j .0 �. L� u.. L • m � , ` 'p � aw � . � � ... _. W � � � �, � ��� a`..i'i v c � N ,� .% 'rn m 'O �` � O _ � � Z > � a.. U � = c � � cn v� t ¢ �� � - i� i ��W V I Z �..1..� � � 0 {..i� � 0 N 0 � � _ � Z L-L � LL_ � > � � Q L.L � � Ll.� Q Q C' U � z W � O > O Z � I Q � �..L.� "' � Z N � l..iJ Q � I- � U Date: APRIL 2011 Scole: 1"= 10' Drawn: CAD Sheet � of � Sheets ■ aaa.ia f � ( ■ �aa.sa � ,/ k ■ 3i2e5 I � ■ ssz.�c � LIMITS OF NEW CURB, GUTTER � � & DETACHEjD SIDEWALK � PER STD� DET. 1 saz.ae i 15.00' • ` W: , � , � i /� � �z.w; W ` E. WATER � , METER ■ J4i.42 ■ saa.rt � FL=342.12 � 74Z.� � i � 10.00' ROADWA DEDICATION O » 2� �� � �� 2� �� SCALE: t"=10' 'a sxa. aalas •°�� o oiw TEMPORARY ° � BENCHMARK N�o MAG. NAIL=342.95' � 'N �m � �.� TWIN LIVE OAK 25", 12" 11 �� ■ 20.00' BUILDING SETBACK DRIVEWAY ' 5=0.03 > i ■`+^_� ° s I x iU :� 'O � : a � ; °� 24.00' . � TC= 42 8 0 0 I�I 10 00' � 3 F o BEG 0 o � _ o - 20.00' c BUILDI SETBA K . ,� i . ��. � � 24. 0' ■ ana.as r 43.53 � O O ■ :w �� Q 3 I � o ORIVEWAY o � � 5=0.02 � 1 z I■ �x.e� 7.92' FL=343.2 BLD. BEGIN SWALE SETBACK HIGH POINT N89_56' � FG=343.4 GARAGE � FF=343.73' (AT REAR) S=0.01 � 5.08' BLD. • ; SETHACK FG=343.4 r saa.aa 3��+� = 343.3 SWALE P I T S89'56 0"E 5.5 _ _. __ , 125.00' M ?d:.N� Sf:t.'ii ■ aas.,s ABBREVIATION: ,,,,� � E. EXISTING � E. WATER EG EXISTING GRADE METER FG FINISH GRADE TC TOP OF CURB 2 ,,�� ; FL=342.63i FL FLOW LINE "�+`� 5=0.01 SLOPE=0.01 "�`331' �+�a3.e' TYP. TYPICAL BEGIN NEW CURB, GUTTER FF FINISHED FLOOR & DETACHE,D SIDEWALK PER STD` DET 1-19 N zo �o o ,o zo SCALE: 1 "=10' TEMPORARY BENCHMARK MAG. NAIL=342.95' JOINT UTILITY POLE � . PG&E � VAULT PG&E � SERVICE BOX ' ! I . . ( � EDGE OF I � � PAVEMENT ' TYP. � , ` TWIN LIVE OAK 4.5' WIRE FENCE �5.00' � 25 12" � : : . .. ` N89'S6'30"W 135.00' � � - - -...- - - , � +.. �...� , � � � � ; ..w..,..a w . �www� � � ..... � Z�J.O�� ... . W : E. GAS i > � METER � ' , .,,_,_.,,...,�,..�........,..........�.._. FENCE 6' WOOD � ` ,� � 1 �. � ' � � � ,� E. GARAGE � ` I E. HOUSE �. WATER � �' : METER ', 1, % � I.-�---._..�.... �.. I � ,: : I � � I ' `' ' �< ' ' � AT � ; _.. h,r. _ : � �10.00' ROADWAY � DEDICATION , CONCRETE , ASPHALT � 4' CHAIN ` o � I � LINK FENCE DRIVEWAY � N i � ��.. ... ' i .. � - °---°_....... \ \ ............ ....._ ; 3 'a O �\\� ���\ �,� o / 3 o ASPHALT �;. o 0 -: • �, oz � � ORIVEWAY ��O � o � � � A.P.N. 357-18 031 \ \ \ /� : � � � ....—.... _--- � .____. ...------.... o o m . ..._.�..... .. z P w 1 3 �..`.,_. .- � � �„� �........ --._.. ::.::. - -c<� ...�...----.._.-...__._..__.... .........--�- _ ......__--- .........-- -._..---- -._......--- ......._. � o \`�` \` .T,-�-..�'... ��\` �r-: �, : , : N ° ASPHALT m ' � � DRIVEWAY � : �, ' • ' __._.�..}......_.. ._.----- �`�� ._..__._ __..�..--.. _--�--. �` ..............- __.....�. ASPHAIT 1 i �.��� I DRIVEWAY r 3 1 BRICK ; I PAVING coNC. I f CURB & E. WATER ! ' � ; f � ' � GUTTER METER� ' � ` ' ` � � ` C_]: I E. HOUSE \� : ( : -,.}/{' I -----°�----------- .. 1 � � i / I 1 1 � I � � l � 1 \�` _ E. GARAGE k � � I �' 4' CHAIN 6' WOOD ' LINK FENCE FENCE ; i � E. GAS ...... _.._....._.___._ - ; METER ; , ' : T - - � ..... .. ........_ S89 56 30 E 135.00 .� � _ � � _ � _ � _ � - _ r, _ _ 12_5.00' ,� . .. . ... �- � I , . � . � : � � WOOD FENCE � 6' WOOD � � FENCE 15.00' 30.�00' i L� JOINT � UTILITY POLE ; LEGEND: - - PROPERTY LINE _._... _ __ ...... FENCE LINE --�----�-��-�•-���---� �--- EDGE OF ASPHALT ��� - - ": - CONTOUR LINE � JOINT UTILITY POLE APN: 357-18-031 GROSS AREA: 12,960 S.F 0.30 AC. NET AREA: 12,000 S.F. 0.28 AC. NOTE: SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTS WERE NOT FOUND DURING THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. REVISIONS � c o - ., � C N (� � C� U r, c c m ^' o ` �3 c ;�� = fn � `� o � � �L� � otf x ctl x 41_1 N �(�.� G • m • � '% •� o� � '� m = 5 `n •°' ';: C � c r � . � (0 S1 � '-.. V C N ;V � Z � � m � 0 3 � W � � - ' N � _ � ro U tU � V- v �j c � � v z a �� � - W• z� 0, z � � � Z M �..L.� � � I W DO r O I � � � u J � M V L Z � _ � c~ a X � Z �--L� W � / O � Q �.L J � �J..� Q Q C' U � Z w � O � O Z � ~ Q � � � � �.1.� Z N �- w Q � � � U Date: APRIL 2011 Scale: 1"= 10' Drawn: CAD Sheet Z J of � Sheets , :i zo , o o , o so SCALE: 1'=10' TEMPORARY BENCHMARK MAG. NAIL�342.95' ABBREVIATION: E. EXIS7ING EG IXlS71NG GRADE TC TOP OF CURB FL FLOW LJNE 5=0.01 SLOPE�0.01 ,�. ���,� FF FlNISHED FLOOR i I � I I y • a1z�e � l! OF NEW dc DETACH y PER - HIGH POINT � � � � �� � � �o.00� � BUILDING - - sEreAC�c r � DRIVEWAY I I � GARAGE 5=0.03 I FFm343.73' � � (AT REAR) � � I I S=0.01 r � 7.92' BLD. SElBAqC 0 I SIDEWALK � TfP. SURFACE 810-SWALE _ f5. � - - - - - - - EGm34f.39 � �«.�� . �,..� � � - - - - � � F 343.4 I � A � ~ { II 7N.M NEIN RESiDENCE 1 I �( PERCULATION FF=344.40' / '. PI BASEMENT O I , GRATE=341.2 ° a FFm334.40' x�.n m °�� �,�„ �LOT 1 , . I � 6.000 S.F. I / x ��° 0.14 AC. � i 20.00' BUILDING 1 P � LIGHTWELL � I ~ / SETBACK sa� I ��' � ■ 341.l0 � � 1 "�„ SETBAq( I r aa.a t � G= R 3�2.77� bI2W •� _� O :� �.8 � � � - - _� _ . -- --- ro _ . .. BEqN SWALE ... HIGH POINT S89�E -Y r.08' BLD. SETBACK �� '� 20.00' � , . . - - - -- v� BUILDI �' � �TBA a I : ,� 1 ■ ■ w.. sam P I •s�n » .� = rg I '� 3 �' DRIVEWAY I GARAGE o$� 5=�02 I I (AT REAR) 3 s—.o.o, 1 z �■'r''iv I I «- � k � CO UGH7WELL � ■w� I : su.r� NEW RESIDENCE �a�+.ss' ,�.,6 BASEMENT F'F=334.65' LoT z NET AREA: R; 6.000 S.F. 0.14 AC. I UGHTWELL — — � � - - O vi G a ,rt a a t �--re�- y 25.00' � i saaa. . � ■ - - - 1, � 'Y y� - � � •� FL=343.0 SIDE I TCr3�3.38 H�G1i POINT� TYP. � 15.00' � 30�00' --� � r s+�u ` � s�.ao � B, GU � SID ALK DET. -19 � � ! --- � � W H \ y � Q'a �,,,� E. WATER I y I _ ME7ER � .� Z Q FL=342.12 � �10.00' ROADWAIf ti DEDICA710N y 9 i 1 - O N �� 3 f (� y Y W o � �p � < vi- a a a. I E. WATER ME7ER y � y FL=34263/ � xaum EGIN NEW R8, GUTTER � DETACH�D SIDEWALK PER STd DET. 1-19 I .IOINT UP�� N . , �"a's I PGdcE J VAULT � PGdcE SERVICE BOX y , N I I N N I I y N I I y H ( � � r s�s�o I I I NOTES: � ( 1Q SEE PERCULAl10N PIT DEf/Ul, STORM WATER � �� I OVERFLOW TO DRAIN INTO FUTURE STORM DRAIN IN JOINT ORANGE AVE. s�-��UTY P� ( � UGHIWELL DRAINS TO DRAIN TO PUMP SY51EM. w.ee � INSTALL STD. MANHOLE (SUMP HOLE) WITH SOUD COVER NATH DUPLEX PUMPS PER NO?ES, SHEET 2 PROVIDE HIGH WA7ER ALARM MOUNIED IN BASEMENT NA7H SYVITCN SET AT EL.=89.8'. SET ON AND OFF SWITCHES AT EL=89.2' AND 88.2 REPECTIVELY. Q4 Y SCHL 40 PVC PRESSl1RE PIPE MA1ti CHECK VALVE TO BlfBBLE UP. � MSTALL BUBBLE UP. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. GRATE ELEV. = 342't � DOYMN SPWTS SHALL RELEASE TO GROUND SURFACE, DRAINAGE SHOULD BE DIREC7ED AWAY FROM BU{LDING FOtlNDA110N AND TO LANDSCAPED NREAS. � INSTALL PERIMETER DRAIN AT OUTSIDE BASE OF BASEMENT/ RETAINING WALL 6RAVITY DRAIN TO SUMP HOLE. MIN. SLOPE�IX, SEE N07E5 AND DET,VL, SHEET 2 � CONNECT PERIMETER DRAIN TO SUMP. � INSTALL GRINDER/ PUMP (SANITARI� WITH qiEq( VALVE. COWNECT 1ST FLOOR AND BASEMENT SANITARY DRAIN UNES TO THIS PUMP. SEE PLUMBING PLANS. � INSTALL 2' SCHL 40 PVC PRESSURE PIPE SEVVER UNE WI1H CHECK VALVE. 11 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. ESTiMATED LOCATION OF EXISTING LAiERAL, EXACT LOCATION TO BE DE7ERMINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. A�OVE SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT TO 6EHIND PROPERTY UNE SEE CLEANOUT DETAIL. SHEET 2 ...125. ..- -...- .. i8'30'E 135.00' 7.92' BLDG. SE7BACK r sasis " y ���342.0t fl� � ■ sa�,�o PERCU �ON o "^' �" PIT o ATE=341.3 � � I m 1 Iz 3 I a 0 °� � �� i . .� . :� g 20� G '� SETBACK /�°" � ' --� 1 t -- =��= -- FG=34245 EG=342 NOTES (cont.): � UNDERGRWNO ALL E�S71NG OVERHEAD UTILJTIES TO NEW HOUSE. (ELEC., PHONE, AND OR CABLE SERVICE IN ,101NT TRENCH). � WATER SERVICE, MOVE EXISTING WAlER METER TO BEHIND PROPERTY LlNE. ALL EARTHYYORK, INCIUDING FOOlING AND BASEMENT EXCAYA110N, PREPARA110N OF OF SIAB-ON GRADE UNDERLAYMENT, PLACEA�IENT OF RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE, PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF FlLL AND SURFACE DRAWAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHWLD BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE VYI7H THE GEOTE(�iNICAL REPORT PREPARED �Y DATED 2011. SHOULD BE ALLOWEO AT LEAST 48 HOURS ADVANCE NOTIFlCATION OF ANY EAR7HNIORK OPERAT{ONS AH� SHOULD BE PRESENT TO 06SERVE AND/OR 7EST AS NECESSARY THE EARTHWORK AND FOUNDAitON INSTALLATiON PHASES OF 7HE PROJECT. LEGEND: — — �oP�nr uNE ■ s�s�a SPOT ELEVATION E. GRADE �e DRAINAGE, DIRECTION OF FLOW ,a ,rr JOINT U71UTY iRENCH, POWER, GAS, N, CABLE, COMAI. SS SANITARY SEWER MPJN a a SANITARY SEWER LATERAL W WATER MAIN G GAS MAIN � APN: 357-18-031 (LOTS 1 & 2) GROSS AREA: 12,960 S.F. 0.30 AC. NET AREA: 12,000 S.F. � 0.28 AC. �� �� ,�z ��J �0 �f. � � � v c � o • U •V �; � p r_ t�V ;�E� � 'S L �! � ,�9v, �,g�a � � x ��� � �> > a LL � � � • A • � DI �,C� �m� � � � •=' W�m ^�? 0 .Y = � ''•v � ? �W� 03 v�` � � �; �� � � � �/ z � �� - ur Z� z /\� Ird t069Z z � � � V Z Z w � 0 � O Q � � � L.LJ Q C� U � � � Q O Q � Z Z O — � � LL J r �'L'� � � O � � r— U Date: APRIL 2011 Scale: 1'= 10' I Drown: CAD Job: �,�t � of � Sheats � � Y J d � Q � � Z � � � J � Z � � � - � W � � ,� � F.F.�344.40' a � a DRIVEWAY �� '� I EwSnNG GRnDE 3�4 $ +0.01 344 ( ( 340 340 FINISH GRADE BASfMENT F.F.=334.40' 3� MIN. FINISH fL00R 12" 2X MIN. 336 336 � CONC. SLAB � BASEMENT f100R 10. . .. �D. �O� ♦� M . . . . . f. . Y7 t0� . (C .. .. ... .... O .. . . . . O, . . O, . . . .. . � f` .. . . 10.. .. . . � n r�i r�i n n �i n n n n M n n n n PAD ELEVATION 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0t80 1+00 1+20 1+40 SECTION A LOT 1 TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION � SCALE: HORIZONTAI.: i"=1a' NOT TO SCALE � w VERTICAL: 1 O W ►- � Z � � J CHRISTY U21 � Z � � � � HOLE WITH LIGHT DUTY �n '�' F.F.a344.65 �' CAST IRON CRATE a o � � DRIVEWAY GARAGE J � a SIAB iX MIN. 1% M� � EXISTING GRAOE ' k s�ao, � � : z 344 344 r ' 3 ��""a N � � � � � � �� �� � � ` 340 I , 3/4" DRAIN ROpC 3 � 15 L.F. 24' H.D.P.E. PIPE ' • BASEMENT FINISH GRADE OVERfLOW TO FUTURE STORM �> ° i F.F.=334.65 DRAIN IN ORANCE AVE. �; ; � A 336 , 336 6" SCHEDULE 40 ' ` PVC PERfORATED PIPE M . M M . T . 1 �.. . . C� .Or. N . . . f . . .... . 'r . . �. . �. � . . . .+' . . . n � `, a �: .. ... , n " a . v e cv � .cv � v Y v `v < , � ` M� h h� M. M� �� M h. M1�. M M M �� M� ; . . � . _ �. . �. � '. _ _ i 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 7+00 1+20 1+40 SECTION B LOT 2 °� PERCULATION PIT DETAIL $CALE: HORIZONTAL• t'=10� I DISTANCE fROM PROPERTY uHE tp gE �S cxoSE �5 NOT TO SCALE VERTICAL: 1"a4' � I PRACTIGtL AND NOT TO I E%C�ED F'IVE (S) FEET. � ( ED PUBUC RIGHT OF �MAY ! �, STMIDARO ClEANOUT REUOVABLE ClEANOUT PIUG � Flr�s►+ cR,�oE T ACC�55 80X SHALL BE (�1RIStt GS ' ' TRAfF1C VAIVE BOx 10-3/S' I.O. X 12" YY11M WYE i'OR RISER G5C iJD LABEt.ED 'SEWER' CLEANOUT RISER P�E � ,��' e�r+o I REDUCER f7TTarG ADMTOR COUPLING SI2E PER MANUFAC7URER'4 SPEC�ICAflONS 1-t/4' PVC OR HOPE (TYP) -�---2X Mh � .�.�-27[ Uin PRE55URE flOw fkOY PUMP I STREET LATERK SEWER HOt15E LATERAL SEWER --�,-_.— ' --'4 -'- � a NOTES: i. AlL ON-SITE PIUMBiNG, IN ACCOROANCE NATH LOCAI JURISO�CTION BUILO�NG DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. 2. LATERAL SEWER CLEANOUT TO 8E SAME SIZE A5 STREET IATERAI SEWER• 3. 6-INCH MINIMUM CIEARANCE BETYYEEN REMOVABLE CLEANOUT PLUC AND INSIDE OF 80X REQUIRED. 4. REfER TO PUMP MANUFACTURER'S RECOAtMEN0AT10N5 fOR ANY Ap01T10NAl EWIPIYtENT REQUIREO FOR THE PRESSURE LINE ANO CONNECTON TO GRAV11'Y SEWER. 6� NATIVE SO�L COMPACTEO TO 90X N 1 3/4 ' DRAIN ROp( � WATER PROOfING MARAFI 140 FILTER fABRIC RETAININC WALL FOR BASEMENT VAPOR BARRIER PER SOILS REPORT BASEMENT fL00R CAPILLARY BREAK MATERIAL t2 , PER SOILS REPORT 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE p R A I N T O S U M P A T i X M I N. BASEMENT RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE NOT TO SCALE NOTES 1. PROVIDE DRAIN ROCK, fiITER fABPoC ANO t� SCHL. 40 PVC PERfORATED PIPE PER DET/UL A. ON THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE RETAINING WALI FOR THE BASEMENT. DRAIN AT MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1X TO CONCRETE SUMP WITH AN INVERT Of _�. PROVIDE DUPLEX PUMP SYSTEM ORAINAGE SYSTEM NATH A TEEL /2P355 SUBMERSIBLE EffLUENT PUMP CONTROILED NATN A /2P544 80X AND /2P055 fLOAT SMATCH, USE 2' SCHL. 40 PVC PIPE FOR CONNECTION TO THE ORAINAGE SYSTEM. PUMP REOUIRES A 230 VOIT 20 AMP CIRCUI7, ALL WIRING AND PLUMBINC TO BE PER THE NATIONAL ELECTRiC CODE AND THE UNIFORM PLUM8ING CODE. 2. EXTERIOR SURFACE OF RETAINING WALL FOR THE BASEMENT TO BE TREATED FOR WATER PROOFING. 3. FLOOR Of BASEMENT TO BE PlACEO ON VAPOR BARRIER ANO CAPILLARY BREAK MATERIAI PER SOILS REPORT, 6' DIA. GRATE IN CONC. 80X �R MlN. t� Mt 2 ' � N � 3/4" DIA. ORAIN ROCK r � �-i�; ' ___1_ � .;'�,"`� � 2' SCHED. �0 PVC f } � 1 I �J. � PERFORATED PIPE � ;� � �_,`__ , � 6" � � BUBB�.E UP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE REVISIONS � `c � 0 O� V m c ` �o � �� � � � � � � � j � o o, N Y� � �� ��� � J N LL- '� � � • N � C � � C ��j � u �� `Y �IO � � � � � N ti 3 O W U $ � � ZU� m � � z � � Z� a I) - ��' O'' i �� V I Z � � U VI � � J � �..lJ � Z � � � C.� Z Z W � � � O a a J � �..1..) Q (,� U � Q � Q /1/ O LL Z C7 z L (D � J � W w N 11 � O � � �— U Oote: APRIL 2011 Scoir. t to' Drown: CAO Job: Sheet � o( � Sheets REED ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHfiECTURE an soun� T� sr�r suNNrvu� c�wa�u woee /0�.��1-�0l0/�0�.��7-�0P! FAX w6: wwnlurl / wrt Yr�l ORANGE AVE. HOME ORANGE AVE. Cuperfino, CA ISSUE pq7E — — 1210.09 ORANGE AVENUE f�V�i 1 IRJ 1 G�7 L T}�E CONTRACTOR SHALL V62FY PLAM C�UAMTTES FROM TI-E PLAM1Vf' PLAN. IX1AMITES ° WN N Tl-E IFGB�D ARE FOR CANVB�BJCE ONLY. 2 NOTFY TuE LArDSCAPE ARCHIECT WNA�IAT�Y N T}�E EVENT OF ANY DISC'.R�ANCES BETW�I ACTUAL SITE COrDfT10NS ArD Tl-E PLA�fTNG PLAN. 3. PLANT GROII�DCOVH2 N SI-RUB AREAS AS NOl'�, USE TRIANGIA.lu2 SPACNG. 4. S� DET,4d. AND SPECFICATION SI-�TS FOR ADDITIONAL rFORMATIOtJ. 5. Tl-ERE Wtll BE NO MA1821ALS OR PLANT MATS2IALS SI.BSTITUTIONS WfTHOUT APPROVAL OF TI-E OW�B2 OR Tl-E LANDSCAPE ARC:t�RECT. 6. ALL SLOPE� PLANTID WITH LAWN NOT TO EXC� A yi SLOPE ALL SLOPE'' PLANT� WITH GROU�D COV62 NOT TO DfC�D A 2d SLOPE 7. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRANAGE AWAY FROM ALL Bll1NJC'S (2E MW 8. N Tl-E EVB�IT OF ANT DISCR�ANCES BETWEBJ TF�S PLAN MD ACTUAL SfTE C.ONDfTIONS� TI�E LArD�',�CAPE ARCHTECT IS TO BE NOTF� N�kv�IATELT. 9. ODT OF �lSH�GR�ADE� C SCA�PE C T� IS TO�R�E �� 1fo LAPD°.,CAPE AREAS. 10. ALL St7E UTIJT�S ARE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. N TFE EVENT OF CO�FLICT BETW�J THE PLANS ArD UTLI11E5 T�E CONTRACTOR SNALL NOTFY THE LA�.�CAPE ARC�lTECT. ANY DAMAGE TO UTLITES. STRUCTU2ES. OR OTI-H2 FEATlI2ES TO REMAN. A�D CAUSED BY TI-E LArDSCAPF CONTRACTOR SNALL BE REPLAC� OR R�AR� BY TNE CONTRACTOR AT NO D(PHJ�3E TO TF� OWt�62. B. TI�E W0121C N TL�SE DRAWNCS ArD SPECXiCATpNS MY RI.N CONCI�ffLY WfTH WORK BY OTI$2S. TI-E LA�DSCAPE COrfTRACTOR $HqLL COORDNATE TI.E WpRK WITH OTF82 CONTRACTORS. Yl. REFH2 TO CNL B�K�EB2'S PLANS FOR OV62ALL SRE p2ADNC' APD DRANAGE q. SOD LAWN $�IALL BE DWARF FESCI� BLE�. I4. PRIOR TO ANY DIGGNG 02 1RB�CL#JG. CAIl 1�GR�l1ND 5H2VICE ALH2T - �eoo.n��eoo PLAIVT 3YMIBOLS 5 INDICATES PWJT K�1' INDICATES PWJf QUANTITY :�� r .�� ��F�.����E � �OG ^� �o � �� c; � �=��� ;�� :, � � �, �. � �� ��■�� � �� � PAUL JAY REED � NO. 2002 y +t o�. vrson * dy. �P �r e ¢ �� OWNERSMP AND USE OF DOCUMENfS M Ormr'age, Sp�eH'catbm oM wpip tMrwf turni�had Dy ���lanicap.�wc�l.em� ai. ma .haa mrw:i oNy �MA rupeet lo fhb Projsct ond an no! 10 M wW on uny otMr proj�el. s�e�+.� a e�.�.ia,�� c� �,..t omad ��c� �- QufromsMt or Iw pwpo�n in connaefion wRh tAa � N orMw Lad�.��M�hl Ia��coqrqM a otlrr nesrvad rqM�. �wP•owa Pl� Drawn DS Revlered qr Project No. 11.12 Scak ��$" s�'-0" hsua Data 3.28.10 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L1.0 PLANT L.IST� OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CUPERTINO CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 -3255 (408) 777 -3308 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • hlanningCGCUhertino.or� Subject: Report of the Community Development Director Planning Commission Agenda Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 The City Council met on June 7, 2011 and discussed the following item(s) of interest to the Planning Commission: 1. Steve Jobs presents to Cupertino City Council - Apple Inc. CEO, Steve Jobs, presented his proposal for a new Apple Campus to the Cupertino City Council. This presentation was recorded Tuesday, June 7, 2011 at the Cupertino Community Hall and is available for viewing at www.cupertino / apple . Upcoming Dates: June 19 World Journal 35 Anniversary, 10:30 a.m., Memorial Park Amphitheater July 4 Independence Day Celebration July 14 -28 Cinema at Sundown Enclosures: Press Release G: � Planning Aarti S � Director's Reports pd6 14- 11.doc 136 Traci Caton From: Rick Kitson Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:37 PM Subject: City of Cupertino to Hold Press Conference, Responds to Apple Announcement, 6/8 1lam CONTACT: RICK KITSON Public & Environmental Affairs Director Mobile: (408) 431 -7679 • FAX: (408) 777 -3262 • rickk(Wcupertino.org City Hall • 10300 Torre Avenue • Cupertino, CA 95014 -3255 June 7, 2011 City of Cupertino to Hold Press Conference, Responds to Apple Announcement Press Conference with Mayor Gilbert Wong: Wednesday 6/8/2011, 11am, Cupertino City Hall lobby, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA CUPERTINO, CA- On Tuesday, June 7, Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple, Inc., announced at a City of Cupertino city council meeting that Apple would be moving forward with its plans to build a state -of- the -art campus in Cupertino. At the city council meeting this evening, Mr. Jobs announced the next steps to be taken in Apple's long anticipated plans. Originally announcing plans to build a new campus at a city council meeting in April, 2006, Apple has since purchased a 92 -acre parcel in Cupertino that had previously belonged to HP. Apple now owns a total of 180 acres in Cupertino in the area of to the proposed new campus. The announcement was enthusiastically received by the city council. Apple continues to be the single largest employer in Cupertino and its continued success represents an important and tangible indication of the vitality of our local businesses and economy. "A hallmark of Apple's technology has been innovation and the high value that the company places on design," said Mayor Gilbert Wong. "We have learned to expect that Apple will bring this same high standard to all of its projects." The press conference will be held in the Cupertino City Hall lobby. U.M. 137