CC 07-05-11 ( 1 1 P /
51".1y
CUPERTINO
MINUT ES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Gilbert Wong called the reguJar meeting to order in the Council Chamber,
10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Gilbert Wong, Vice -Mayor Mark Santoro, and Council members Barry Chang,
Orrin Mahoney, and Kris Wang (6:55 p.m.). Absent :: none.
CLOSED SESSION - None
CEREMONIAL MATTERS — PRESENTATIONS
1. Subject: Presentation from the Housing Commission
Recommended Action: Receive presentation
Nicole Maroko, Housing Commission member, reported that the Commission provided
oversight for the city's Housing Element and the below market rate housing. In addition it
made recommendations on the Community Development Block Grant and Human Services
Grant allocations. Ms. Maroko also commented on the Habitat for Humanity project on Cleo
Avenue as well as other projects in the city for senior housing and transitional housing for
victims of domestic abuse. She noted that the Commission continued to pursue affordable
housing opportunities.
The Council received the report and no action was taken.
POSTPONEMENTS
City Clerk Kimberly Smith noted that staff requested a postponement of item No. 19, a summary
easement vacation and termination of agreement for the property north of the Vallco Shopping
Center.
Public Works Director Timm Borden explained that this issue involved a 1974 easement and
staff requested that it be continued to the next Council meeting so that further study and
background could be done.
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 2
Mahoney moved and Chang seconded to continue this item to the next meeting. The motion
carried 4 -0 with Council member Wang absent.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
The City Clerk presented the following written communications:
• Presentations — a copy of the PowerPoint presentation from the Cupertino Housing
Commission
• Item No. 19 — An email from Ruby Elbogen opposed to giving away overhead and below -
ground rights on the property
• Item No. 19 — An email from Darrell Lum inquiring about existing easements on the
property
• Item No. 20 — Staff reports from March 4, 2008 and December 18, 2007, regarding the
Cleo Avenue project
• Item No. 20 — a copy of the PowerPoint presentation from the staff
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Jerome Viet asked Council to reduce a fine he had received from the city in the amount of
$6,100. He stated that a contractor had approached him about two trees in front of his house
saying that they were diseased and should be removed for safety reasons. He permitted the
removal, but later received notice from the city imposing the fine for removal of city trees. He
had not realized they were not his trees, could not afford the fine, and was asking for a hearing on
the matter or a reduction of the fine.
The City Attorney stated that Council could agendize this matter for a future Council meeting. At
that time they could amend the fee schedule and /or agree to an exception clause to the ordinance
in place. Such a clause would apply to all situations, not just this one request. She further noted
that Council could not grant a waiver at this time. Council agreed to discuss whether or not to
agendize this matter later in the meeting.
Darrell Lum stated that he understood that Item 19 had been postponed but he wanted to
emphasize the serious consequences of the lack of disclosure concerning the easement under
discussion. He urged Council to consider the significant impact on the public and the city in
terms of time and money.
Vedang Uttarmar and Ajay Mandlekar, representing the Green Youth Alliance, expressed support
for a city -wide ban on single -use plastic bags, and explained how the bags negatively impacted
the environment and the machinery at recycling centers. Several countries had already banned
their use, as had several local cities, including San Jose, Belmont, Pacifica and San Francisco.
The students noted that there were some side effects: For example, when the plastic bags were
banned in San Francisco, there was an increase in the number of paper bags used, which was not
good for the environment. The students said that that banning single use plastic bags or imposing
a fine on their use, while perhaps not a perfect solution, was a good step in the right direction,
and they asked the City of Cupertino to take the lead on this issue.
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 3
Council Member Kris Wang, who also represented the city on the Santa Clara County Cities'
Association, stated that this issue had been reviewed by the Recycling and Waste Management
Committee and a resolution on banning single use plastic bags would be coming to all of the
member cities for discussion. These issues took time and were not resolved overnight. However,
the education of residents was underway and steps were being taken.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mahoney and Wang moved and seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as
recommended, with the exception of Item No. 19 which had been postponed to the August 2
meeting. Ayes: Chang, Mahoney, Santoro (except for item No. 3), Wang, and Wong. Noes:
None. Abstain: Santoro abstained on approval of item 3 since he was not in attendance at the
June 7 meeting.
2. Subject: May 23 City Council minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes
3. Subject: June 7 City Council minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes
4. Subject: June 21 City Council minutes - Special meeting
Recommended Action: Approve minutes
5. Subject: June 21 City Council minutes - Regular meeting
Recommended Action: Approve minutes
6. Subject: Payroll for period ending June 10, 2011
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution 11 -105
7. Subject: Payroll for period ending June 24, 2011
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. [ 1 -106
8. Subject: Accounts Payable for period ending June 10, 2011
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. l 1 -107
9. Subject: Accounts Payable for period ending June 17, 2011
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. l 1 -108
10. Subject: Accounts Payable for period ending June 24, 2011
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. l 1 -109
11. Subject: Amend July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2012 Terms and Conditions of Employment
for Cupertino Unrepresented (Management and Confidential) employees
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution Nos. 11 -110 and 11 -111.
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 4
12. Subject: Alcoholic Beverage License, TGI Fridays, 10343 North Wolfe Road (Vallco
Shopping Center)
Recommended Action: Approve application for On -Sale General for Bona Fide Public
Eating Place
13. Subject: Alcoholic Beverage License, Cypress Hotel & Park Place Restaurant & Bar, 10050
South De Anza Boulevard (City Center)
Recommended Action: Approve application for On -Sale General for Bona Fide Public
Eating Place, Caterer's Permit, Controlled Access Cabinet Permit, and Portable Bar
14. Subject: 2011 Pavement Maintenance Project
Recommended Action: Review bids and award contract for 2011 Pavement Maintenance
Project, Project No. 2011 -04, to the lowest responsible bidder
Description: Staff recommends that Council review bids and award the construction contract
for the 2011 Pavement Maintenance Project, based on bids to be received on June 30, 2011
15. Subject: Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, Villa
Serra Apartments, a California Limited Partnership, County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 326 -09-
072 and 326 -09 -073
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11 -112
Description: The property owner of this residential development will be required to operate
and maintain stormwater management facilities in accordance with the approved Stormwater
Management Plan
16. Subject: Stormwater Management Facility Easement Agreement, Villa Serra Apartments, a
California Limited Partnership, County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 326 -09 -072 and 326 -09 -073
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11 -113
Description: The property owner of this residential development will be required to grant
ingress and egress rights to the City for the purpose of inspecting stormwater management
facilities installed in accordance with the approved Stormwater Management Plan
17. Subject: Municipal Improvements, Villa Serra Apartments, a California Limited Partnership,
20800 and 20900 Homestead Road, APN's 326 -09 -056, 326 -09 -029, 326 -09 -047 and 326 -09-
048
Recommended Action: Accept Municipal Improvements
Description: The work included sidewalk, curb & gutter and driveway approach
improvements
18. Subject: Approval for an additional $25,000 in construction contingencies for the Garden
Gate Safe Routes to School Project No. 2009 -9549, for a total of $334,000
Recommended Action: Approve additional $25,000 in construction contingencies
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above)
19. Subject: Summary easement vacation and Termination of Agreement, where City of
Cupertino releases all of its interest, rights, obligations, duties, etc., acquired from an
agreement recorded on October 17, 1974
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 5
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 11- 114.
Description: Adoption of a resolution summarily vacating an easement and terminating any
interest held by the City over that certain property located north of Vallco Shopping Center,
and immediately southwest of the intersection of I -280 and Wolfe Road, APN 316 -20 -088
The City Clerk distributed an email from Ruby Elbogen opposed to giving away overhead
and below - ground rights on the property, and an email from Darrell Lum inquiring about
existing easements on the property. Under the "Postponements" section, this item was
continued to the New Business section of the August 2 meeting.
Darrell Lum, in response to an inquiry from Council Member Chang, stated that the easement
did not allow for building two -story condominiums. If the city and the developer had been
aware of these easements the project would not have been proposed as it was and the matter
would not have ended up in a lawsuit and referendum.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
20. Subject: Six lot subdivision with four new, two -story, single family homes proposed on Cleo
Avenue (APN 362 -31 -004) by Habitat for Humanity
Recommended Action: Approve project.
Description: Tentative Subdivision Map (TM- 2011 -01) to subdivide 0.30 acres into four lots
and two common area lots for a single family residential development; Development Permit
(DP- 2011 -02) and Architectural & Site Approval (ASA- 2011 -06) for four, two -story single
family dwellings; Parking Exception (EXC- 201.1 -06) to allow a parking ratio of 2 open stalls
per dwelling, in lieu of the required 2.8 stalls (garage and open) per dwelling
City Clerk Kimberly Smith distributed staff reports from March 4, 2008 and December 18,
2007, and a copy of the staff's PowerPoint presentation.
Senior Planner Colin Jung stated that the issues before Council were the entitlements that
would allow the actual construction of the project to begin. He explained that in 2005 the city
had acquired the property from Caltrans for an affordable housing project using housing
mitigation funds. In December, 2007 the city agreed to transfer the property to Habitat for
Humanity for a low and very-low affordable housing project. In 2008 the city rezoned the
property from multi - family to planned residential with community development block grant
funds to pay for pre - development costs. From November, 2008 to June, 2011 Habitat had
worked with the neighbors on the proposed project. He also that earlier discussion items
including noise, maintenance of common areas, privacy and parking had been addressed.
The public hearing was opened at 8:04 p.m.
Applicant Chris Weaver, Director of Housing Development for Habitat for Humanity,
explained that screening for applicants was much like that done by banks or mortgage
lenders, only more restrictive. She noted that in the last 25 years they had built 50 homes and
there had been no defaults. If an owner had to move and sell, Habitat would buy the property
back and resell it as affordable housing. The city could decide on the affordability restriction.
For example the restriction for below market rate units in the city was 99 years. However, the
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 6
city could place any length of time they wanted to on the units. No rentals were allowed and
there was a four - person limit for each home. Ms. Weaver believed they could get one more
parking unit on site with a reduction in the currently proposed amount of landscaping.
Jill Weaver, Habitat for Humanity's architect, commented on the setback and parking issues.
She believed that they could look again at the project and provide five -foot setback on the
eastern edge and an extra parking space while still maintaining compliance with the fire
department and building code requirements.
Senior Planner Vera Gil stated that the project had been well received in the community with
many people coming forward to volunteer. She noted that the city's minimum threshold was
45 years, but Council could make the determination on length of time.
The following individuals spoke in favor of the project: Wendell Stephens, representing
Cupertino Rotary; Philip Lellman; Ed Ramage, Bingo Chairman at St. Joseph's; Blake
Busick, Pastor of Good Samaritan Church in Cupertino; Dale Jones, representing Bethel
Lutheran Church in Cupertino, Homer Tong, Cupertino Union School Board Member and
resident Jennifer Griffin. Their comments included: This was a good project for all the
community and the opportunity for home ownership was very worthwhile. Ms. Griffin did
believe that the parking should be increased and the standard setbacks should be required.
Zehan Lu, a neighbor of this project and treasurer of his homeowners association, believed
that lots B and D were too close together. He also expressed concerns about privacy for the
neighbors and suggested more landscaping.
Council discussed various aspects of this project and made the following comments:
Councilmember Mahoney suggested extending the affordability restriction, adding a parking
place and keeping the setbacks as proposed. Councilmember Wang suggested extending the
affordability restriction to something over 50 years, requiring the setbacks to comply with the
current code and adding a parking place. She also wanted to see a landscape plan.
Councilmember Chang suggested a 99 -year affordability restriction and a five -foot setback.
Vice -Mayor Santoro suggested adding a parking place, a five -foot setback from side property
lines and additional screening between neighbors. Mayor Wong suggested adding a parking
space, five -foot setbacks, 45 -99 years for affordability restriction, landscape screening for
units B and D and a requirement that garbage cans be in fenced areas.
Mahoney moved and Chang seconded to approve the Tentative Subdivision Map (TM -2011-
01) to subdivide 0.30 acres into four lots and two common area lots for a single family
residential development. The motion carried unanimously.
Mahoney moved to approve the project with the following exceptions: Require 9 parking
spots; require a five -foot setback from the property line, and establish a 50 -year affordability
restriction. Mahoney seconded, and offered a friendly amendment to establish a 75 -year
affordability restriction. Discussion followed and the final motion was agreed upon as
follows:
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 7
Santoro moved and Mahoney seconded to approve, subject to the following changes, the
Development Permit (DP- 2011 -02) and the Architectural & Site Approval (ASA- 2011 -06)
for four, two -story single family dwellings. The motion carried unanimously. The changes
included:
• Add a ninth parking space to the site plan
• Increase the side setback along the eastern edge from four feet to five feet
• Set the affordability term for the project at 65 years
• Add articulation to the buildings along the eastern and southern property lines, or, as an
alternative, add a landscape screen.
Santoro moved and Mahoney seconded to approve the Parking Exception (EXC- 2011 -06) to
allow a parking ratio of 2.25 open stalls per dwelling, in lieu of the required 2.8 stalls (garage and
open). The motion carried unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
21. Subject: League of California Cities Annual Conference Sept. 21 -23 in San Francisco
Recommended Action: Designate voting delegate and up to two alternates
Wang moved and Wong seconded to name Mayor Wong as delegate to the League of
California Cities Conference and Council Member Mahoney as alternate. The motion carried
unanimously.
ORDINANCES - None
STAFF REPORTS
Director of Parks and Recreation Mark Linder asked Council if they had any issues they wanted
included in the upcoming discussion of the Parks and Recreation work plan for 2011 -12. Council
agreed that the sports center and swimming pool would be included as they were a part of the
city's budget discussions. In addition it was agreed to include the dog park issue for possible
discussion at a future date.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events.
Council agreed to agendize for future meetings the following items: the affordability restriction
for below market rate housing, the banning of single use plastic bags, the fee rate schedule, the
tree ordinance and a possible exception clause to the current ordinance. The request from Mr.
Viet made earlier in this meeting would be put on hold pending further discussion by Council.
Council noted that they had attended the following events: July 4 festivities (Council
commended staff for very well run events.), the auction at Euphrat Museum, Rotary's Global
July 5, 2011 Cupertino City Council Page 8
Elegance event, the Historical Society's fundraiser and the Chinese American torch event at City
Hall.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:35 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. The July 19 meeting has been cancelled, and the next
meeting will take place on August 2 beginning at 5:00 p.m.
tf door
Kimberly Smith,, i Clerk
Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the City Council meeting are available
for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777 -3223, and also on the Internet at www.cupertino.org.
Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click on the appropriate Packet.
Most Council meetings are shown live on Comcast Channel 26 and AT &T U -verse Channel 99
and are available at your convenience at www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then
click Archived Webcast. Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased
from the Cupertino City Channel, 777 -2364.