The URL can be used to link to this page

09-20-11 Searchable PacketèÛÚÐ×ÍÖùÍÎÈ×ÎÈÉ ûÕ×ÎØÛ é×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×ÊùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐÏÓÎÇÈ×É øÊÛÖÈïÓÎÇÈ×É ûÙÙÍÇÎÈÉìÛÃÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØ×ÎØÓÎÕûÇÕÇÉÈ øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ûÙÙÍÇÎÈÉìÛÃÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØ×ÎØÓÎÕé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ìÛÃÊÍÐÐÖÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØ×ÎØÓÎÕé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉéÛÎÕíÔð××ÛÎØôÃ×ãÍÇÎÕð×× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØûìî éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÛÌ ïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉùÛÊÍÐÛæ÷ÐÐÓÍÈÈ ð×ÚÛÎÍÎ øÊÓÆ×ûìî éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÛÌ ïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉùÔ×ÎÕãÇÛÎïÓÙÔÛ×ÐåÛÎÕÛÎØ ïÓÙÔ×ÐÐ×öÛÎåÛÎÕ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛûÆ×ÎÇ×ûìî éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÛÌ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÊÍÒ×ÙÈìÔÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ õÊÛÎÈ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ× ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÙÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈûéùùìÔÛÉ× óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Ø î×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈúéùùìÔÛÉ× ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉèÍ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈùéùùìÔÛÉ× ïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕìÐÛÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈø÷êùïÓÎÇÈ×ÉûÇÕÇÉÈ ûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖïÛÈÙÔöÇÎØÓÎÕÖÍÊø×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖøÍÎúÇÊÎ×ÈÈ úÓÙÃÙÐ×ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎúÊÓØÕ× éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈûøÍÎúÇÊÎ×ÈÈð×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÇÊ×úÓÐÐ ðÓÚÊÛÊÃùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ÛÌÌÍÓÎÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖ ÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÍ×ÈðÛÇÊ×ÛÈ× éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ øÊÛÖÈê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÈÍíÌÈóÎÈÍÛæÍÐÇÎÈÛÊÃûÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ìÊÍÕÊÛÏÇÎØ×ÊûúÄ ÈÔ×æÍÐÇÎÈÛÊÃìÊÍÕÊÛÏûÙÈ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ øÊÛÖÈíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× ûÕ×ÎÙÃèÊÛÎÉÖ×ÊìÛÃÏ×ÎÈûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈú×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈûÕ×ÎÙÃÛÎØÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ øÊÛÖÈûÕ×ÎÙÃúÍÛÊØê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ øÊÛÖÈùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎ ûÕ×ÎÙÃèÊÛÎÉÖ×ÊìÛÃÏ×ÎÈûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10350 Torre Avenue, Community Hall Council Chamber Tuesday, September 20, 2011 6:45 PM CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION -None CEREMONIAL MATTERS –PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject:Proclamation recognizing The Forum on their 20th anniversary Recommended Action:Present proclamation Page:No written materials in packet POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council frommaking any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendarbe acted on simultaneously. 2.Subject:September 6 City Council minutes Recommended Action:Approve minutes Draft Minutes Page:8 Tuesday, September 20, 2011Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 3.Subject:Accounts Payable for period ending August 26, 2011 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-159 Draft Resolution Page:17 4.Subject:Accounts Payable for period ending September 2, 2011 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-160 Draft Resolution Page:27 5.Subject:Payroll for period ending September 2, 2011 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-161 Draft Resolution Page:39 6.Subject:Municipal Improvements, Sang Oh Lee and Hye Young Lee, 22685 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 342-12-024 Recommended Action:Accept Municipal Improvements Description:The work included sidewalk, curb & gutter and driveway approach improvements Staff Report Map Page:40 7.Subject:Municipal Improvements, Carola V. Elliott, 10128 Lebanon Drive, APN 342-14- 023 Recommended Action:Accept Municipal Improvements Description:The work consisted of sidewalk, curb & gutter and driveway approach improvements Staff Report Map Page:42 8.Subject:Municipal Improvements, Cheng-Yuan Michael Wang and Michelle Fan Wang, 10170 Santa Clara Avenue, APN 326-24-046 Recommended Action:Accept Municipal Improvements Description:The work included sidewalk, curb & gutter, street tree and driveway approach improvements Staff Report Map Page:44 Tuesday, September 20, 2011Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 9.Subject:Stevens Creek Corridor Project Phase 2, Project 9134-Grant application authorization Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-162 authorizing application for Habitat Conservation Fund Funding for Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2, Project 9134 Staff Report Draft Resolution Page:46 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR(above) PUBLIC HEARINGS -None UNFINISHED BUSINESS 10.Subject:Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 -Environmental clearance documents Recommended Action:Adopt the mitigated negative declaration and associated environmental clearance documents for Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2, Project 9134 Staff Report Attachment A -SCC Phase 2, Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment B -SCC Phase 2, Responses To Comments Attachment C -SCC Phase 2, Mitigation,Monitoring & Reporting Plan Attachment D -ERC Minutes -August 18, 2011 Page:48 NEW BUSINESS 11.Subject:Appropriation of Match Funding for Dedication of Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge Recommended Action:Approve the appropriation of funds to match contribution Description:The official name of the formerly known Mary Avenue Bridge is now the “Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge.” The Friends of Don Burnett has asked for the City’s assistance in coordinating and advertising a naming ceremony to be held at the south entrance tothe bridge on October 8, 2011. The Friends would also like the City’s assistance in matching funds for a plaque that will be installed near the bridge approach. Staff Report Attachment A -Don Burnett LegislatureBill Page:316 Tuesday, September 20, 2011Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 12.Subject:Library Commission's recommendation for the appointment of the first Cupertino Poet Laureate Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-163 approving the appointment Staff Report Draft Resolution Page:319 ORDINANCES 13.Subject:Ordinance to "Opt-In" to a Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program under ABx1 27, the Voluntary Program Act Recommended Action:Conduct second reading and enact Ordinance No. 11-2080: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino enacted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34193 to elect and implement participation by the City of Cupertino and the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program pursuant to part 1.9 of the California Community Redevelopment Law" Staff Report Draft Ordinance Page:322 STAFF REPORTS COUNCIL REPORTS JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING ROLL CALL – Redevelopment Agency 14.Subject:Agency Transfer Payment Agreement Between the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency and the City of Cupertino Recommended Action: A. Redevelopment Agency action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-05, approving the execution of the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement with the City of Cupertino B. City Council action: Adopt Resolution No. 11-164, approving the execution of the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement with the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Description:The Agreement carries out the remittance payments required under the new opt- in ordinance that allows the Redevelopment Agency to continue its existence. Since the Agreement is between the Agency and the City, the Agency Board and City Council both need to adopt resolutions for the Agreement. Staff Report Draft Agency Board Resolution Draft City Council Resolution Agency Transfer Payment Agreement Page:327 Tuesday, September 20, 2011Cupertino City Council Cupertino Redevelopment Agency ADJOURNMENT –City Council and Redevelopment Agency The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Any interested person, including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of the city council’s decision with respect to quasi-judicial actions, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the city clerk within ten days after the council’s decision. Any petition so filed must comply with municipal ordinance code §2.08.096. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk’s office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, September 6, 2011 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:46p.m. Mayor Gilbert Wongcalled the regular meeting to order in the Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Gilbert Wong, Vice-Mayor Mark Santoro, and Council members Barry Chang, Orrin Mahoney, andKris Wang. Absent: none. CLOSED SESSION -None CEREMONIAL MATTERS –PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject:Proclamation recognizing Target for their participation during National Night Out Recommended Action:Present proclamation Eric Linden, Executive Team Leader for Assets Protectionfor the Cupertino Target store, said that he was able to meet with many of the neighborhood groups around the City to drop off water and some food items during their National Night Outevents. He said he hopes to have a National Night Out event held at the Cupertino Target store next year. Mayor Wong presented the proclamation to Mr.Linden. 2.Subject:Presentation from the Parks & Recreation Commission Recommended Action:Receive presentation Written communications for this item included PowerPoint slides. Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Darcy Paul gave a PowerPoint presentation and highlighted the main items that the Commission focusedonin2010-2011including the Shakespeare Festival; the Memorial Park geese issue; Teen Commission’s Walk One Week (WOW) program; Capital Improvement recommendations; initiated collaboration with the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce; and proposed criteria for cell towers in Cupertino parks. He also highlighted items that the Commission plans to work onfor 2011-2012 including the Cupertino Sports Center pool area; McClellan Ranch/Simms Master Plan; Stevens Creek Corridor Phase II; continue fostering relationships with the business community in Cupertino; Lawrence/Mitty Park; and other various items to inform the communityabout the Parks and September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 2 Recreation department such as Stocklmeir Task Force, updates on annual activities at Blackberry Farm, and Project Cornerstone which helps the youth in the community. POSTPONEMENTS -None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS The following written materials were distributed at the meeting: Petition by Lothar Bandermann to place issue of “Community Tree” vs. “Christmas Tree” onthe Council agenda, Oral Communications PowerPoint slides for the Parks & Recreation Commission presentation, item number 2 Exhibit B showingthe maintenance agreement area, item number 15 Staff PowerPoint slides for Cupertino Crossroads,item number 18 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Santa Clara County Fire Chief Ken Kehmnaintroduced Battalion 14 Chief Kendall Pearson who was first to respond to the call for a fire on August 31at the Northpoint Condominium complex. Chief Pearson thanked the City for its fast response and noted thatfirst on the scene was one of the City’s Code Enforcement officers. Also in attendance was the City’s Building Official, the Mayor, and the City Manager. He explained that this was a full first alarm and that because the complex borders the City of Sunnyvale, they also received multiple calls and sent a full response as well.He said that what was discovered was a gas-fed garage fire and that an explosion had occurred. He said the Fire Department had plenty of resources there, but since they can’t put out a fire that is being fed by gas, PG&E also responded. He said that the PG&E workers did a great job digging down to the gas source in a quick fashionand that the two agencies worked in tandem to resolve the situation. Once PG&E secured the gas mains, theFire Departmentput out the fire. Judy Kubota, PG&E’s Director of Gas Operations,noted that their investigation is still on-going but she wanted to notify the Council about what they have learned so far and what they are doing to ensure their system issafe. She also said she was thankful that no one was hurt in the fire. She explained that their initial investigation discovered a crack in a plastic T on a two-inch distribution main located about 7 feet from the townhouse. She explained that the plasticT and other pipes and fittings were manufactured in the late 1960’s to 1973 and aremade of a resin that is susceptible to slow crack growth. They believe that gas leaking from this distribution T migrated into the garage and ignited the fire. Their firstpriority was to make the area safe. After stopping the flow of gas from the distribution main, they surveyed the entire complex and discovered 6 additional leaks which were repaired immediately. They also pressure tested the distribution main in that areaand confirmed it was sound. On Sept 2, they conducted an additional leak survey in the area as an added precaution. They reviewed their records on the day of the fire anddidn’t find any gas odor calls. She said they are also reviewing all calls received from that complex for the month of August. They have also searched their repair records and didn’t find any repair records at that complex in the past 9 years. They have committed to September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 3 replacing all of the 12,000 feet main in the complex as well as all of the services in the complex. She noted that they will conduct weekly leak surveys in that area and are in communication with the Homeowners Association in the complex. They will continueto develop a comprehensive, integrity, managementplan to address theplastic systems and bring a nationally recognized plastic expert to assist them. They are also reassessing their practices to improve response time and are providing the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)with information about their findings. She explained that they will continue to provide the City with additional updates as they become available and are working with the owner of the townhouse to assist her. Anyone who smells gas should call911 or PG&E immediately. Jennifer Griffin said that the R1 ordinance has been discussedmany times since she has been a resident and that the decisions made to change the R1 recently happened too fast andwasdone hastily. She also urged Council to slow down on the upcoming development permit process. Lothar Bandermann distributed a petition asking Council to change the name of the tall pine in front of the Quinlan Center from “Community Tree” to “Christmas Tree” during the holiday season. He noted thatthe State Capitol tree is called a “Christmas Tree.” Patrick Kwok announced that the Bridge to Health 5K run/walk, sponsored by the Northwest YMCA, will be held on Sept.11 at 8:00 a.m. The event will start at Memorial Park and go across the Mary AvenueBridgeand back. He also noted that in July of this year, Senator Joe Simitian sponsored a resolution to rename the Mary Ave Bridge after former Cupertino Council member Don Burnett. Fundraising efforts are in place to raise $8,000-$10,000through the Cupertino Optimist Club. Public and Environmental Affairs Director RickKitsonsaid that there will be a brief, memorial ceremony recognizing the name change on Oct.8 at 10:00a.m. CONSENT CALENDAR Mahoneymoved and Changseconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as recommended, with the exception of item numbers15 and 17 which werepulled for discussion. Ayes: Chang, Mahoney, Santoro, Wang, and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. 3.Subject:August 16 City Council minutes Recommended Action:Approve minutes 4.Subject:Accounts Payable for period ending August 12, 2011 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-147 5.Subject:Accounts Payable for period ending August 19, 2011 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-148 6.Subject:Payroll for period ending August 19, 2011 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-149 September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 4 7.Subject:Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Ramona Blvd., Inc., a California nonprofit corporation, 22840 Mercedes Road, APN 342-22-109 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-150 Description:The property owner of this residential development agrees to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property 8.Subject:Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Rajesh George and Gangarathna Purlupady, 10471 Westacres Drive, APN 359-14-032 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-151 Description:The property owners of this residential development agree to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property 9.Subject:Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Lynn Youngs and Mikiko Youngs, 10965 Miramonte Road, APN 356-01-032 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-152 Description:The property owners of this residential development agree to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property 10.Subject:Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, 10590 Tantau Investments, LLC, A Delaware limited liability company, 10590 North Tantau Avenue, APN 316-18-035 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-153 Description:The property owner of this residential development agrees to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property 11.Subject:Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Chih-Hui Tung, 10215 Alhambra Avenue, APN 326-23-042 & 326-23-043 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-154 Description:The property owner of this residential development agrees to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property 12.Subject:Quitclaim Deed and Authorization for Underground Water Rights, Tantau Properties LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 10670, 10700 and 10710 North Tantau Avenue, APN 316-09-019, 316-09-027 & 316-09-028 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-155 Description:The property owner of this residential development agrees to grant to the City the right to extract water from the basin under the overlying property 13.Subject:Quitclaim of property on Cleo Avenue (APN 362-31-004) to Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley (Habitat) for affordable housing development Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No.11-156 Description:Staff recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to execute a quitclaim deed for APN 362-31-004 on Cleo Avenue, per the Disposition and Development Agreement between the City of Cupertino and Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley for Cleo Avenue Property, approved by Council June 1, 2010 September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 5 14.Subject:Improvement Agreement, Chih-Hui Tung, 10215 Alhambra Avenue, APN 326-23- 042 & 326-23-043 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-157 Description:Through the improvement agreement with the City, the applicant for a building permit for a single-family residential development will be obligated to bond and construct city-specified roadside improvements along the street frontage of their building site 16.Subject:City Project, Garden Gate Sidewalk Installation, Project No. 2009-9549 Recommended Action:Accept Project No. 2009-9549 Description:The work consisted of installing new concrete sidewalk, handicap ramps and upgrading a traffic signal ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR(above) 15.Subject:Maintenance Agreement, Byer Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership, 20730 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 359-08-020 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 11-158 Description:The property owner of this commercial development will be required to allocate the costs of maintenance, repair and replacement of certain improvements, including landscaping, situated on real property owned by City along 20730 Stevens Creek Boulevard in front of the project, and to establish certain criteria and procedures for the accomplishment of said maintenance, repair and replacement Written communications for this item included an Exhibit B showing the maintenance agreement area. Chang moved and Mahoney seconded to adopt Resolution No. 11-158. The motion carried unanimously. 17.Subject:Blackberry Farm Infrastructure Upgrade Project 2011 Re-Bid Recommended Action:Authorize the City Manager to award contract. Description:The work consists of accessibility improvements to the restrooms, driveway and entryway at the retreat center. An alternative bid item includes the construction of a concrete retaining wall at the foot of the hill near the maintenance yard to prevent soil from the steep slope from slipping into the maintenance yard during the wet season. Chang moved and Mahoney seconded to authorize the City Manager to award the contract. The motion carried unanimously. September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS 18.Subject:Cupertino Crossroads Development Proposal Recommended Action:Approve project Description:Applicant: Mark Creedon (Byer Properties); Permit Nos: ASA-2011-12, DP- 2011-03, EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30; Location: 20750 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Cupertino Crossroads); APN: 359-08-006, 359-08-013, 359-08-020; Environmental Determination: Negative Declaration (EA-2011-10); Descriptions: a. Architectural and Site approval for two new retail building pads and associated site improvements, including, but not limited to, parking lot re-orientation, lighting, landscaping and street frontage improvements consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan. b. Development Permit to allow the construction of two new retail building pads; 8,136 square feet and 5,086 square feet respectively and demolition of an existing 4,930 square foot restaurant building, for a net square footage increase of 8,292 square feet. c. Exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to allow a 26 foot front setback for a new 5,086 retail building pad, where a 35 foot front setback is required. d. Tree Removal Permit to allow the removaland replacement of seventy nine trees within an existing shopping center parking lot in conjunction with the proposed new development Written communications for this item included staff PowerPoint slides. AssistantPlanner George Schroeder reviewed the staff report. Applicant Charles Kahn, Architect,introduced Project Manager Mark Creedon who was there to answer any questions. Mr. Kahn said that he understands Council’s concerns about setbacks and parking. He said it’s important to have restaurantuses at the street to keep the shopping center alive, noting that people like to shop and then have a meal. He also noted that the plan is to includefountains to create an ambience forpeople to stay and enjoy their meal.He said they expect there to be cross-fertilization between the businesses which would only require one parkingspace rather than two. At 9:02p.m. Mayor Wongopened thepublic hearing. Darryl Lum, also speaking for Ned Britt and Robert McKibbinn,said that thewholearea should be under a master plan. He noted that Fontana’s parking lot is in another parcel and Staples is in two parcels showing an example of piece-meal planning. He said that nocriteria weremet for the project to warrant a Heart of the City (HOC) Exception, and that only 18% of Bldg. F complies with the HOC Master Plan.He compared thePanera Bread and Peet’s Coffee development regarding tight parking and lots of traffic noise because it’s close to the street. He also said that Bldg. F would require 64 parking spaces and the project doesn’t meet that number. Jennifer Griffin said that this is an important parcel for Cupertino because of its historical value.She noted that the City has a Heart of the City Master Plan and no exceptions should be granted, making sure there remains a 35-foot setback in that area. September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 7 Mark Matsumotofromthe Cupertino Chamber of Commercesaid that the Chamber promotes and enhances businesses in Cupertino and they support this project. He noted that the developer has won awards for being innovative on previousdevelopments. At 9:18 p.m. Mayor Wong closed the public hearing. Mahoney moved and Wang seconded to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The motion carried unanimously. Santoro moved and Mahoney seconded and Council unanimously approved the following exceptions: Parking to be reviewed a year after completion of the two new building pads Address preserving the largeOak behind Pizza Hut by removing parking spaces near the tree roots, assuming no violation tothelease Front setback for Building Fto be 30 feet from the street curb Allow restaurants to comprise 15% of the shopping center (includes square footage of existing restaurants and 100% of Buildings E and F) Wang moved and Mahoney seconded to approve the applications for the project. The motion carried unanimously. Council recessed from 9:57 p.m. to 10:06 p.m. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None NEW BUSINESS 19.Subject:Arbor Day Proclamation 2011 and submission of application for Tree City USA Designation Recommended Action:Proclaim Saturday, October 22, 2011 as “Arbor Day” in the City of Cupertino; andauthorize the City to submit Tree City USA application Public Works Director Timm Borden reviewed the staff report. Jennifer Griffin said that Cupertino loves trees and will go the extra mile to be sure trees are saved. She noted the City already has a successful tree departmentand was concerned that this application might mean someone else would be telling Cupertino how to run its street tree department and that the property owners would end having to maintain their street trees. Mr. Borden responded that there is no thought of going in any different direction regarding Cupertino taking care of its own street trees. He said that anyordinance amendment would be to add a written, Annual Community Forestry Work Plan which would document what the City is already doing. Santoromoved and Changseconded to proclaim Saturday, Oct. 22, 2011 as “Arbor Day” in the City of Cupertino and authorized the City to submit a Tree City USA application.The motion carried unanimously. September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 8 20.Subject:Ordinance to "Opt in" to an Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program under ABx1 27, Voluntary Redevelopment Program Act Recommended Action:Conduct the first reading of Ordinance 11-2080: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino enacted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34193 to elect and implement participation by the City of Cupertino and the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program pursuant to part 1.9 of the California Community Redevelopment Law" Acting City Attorney Gary Baum reviewed the staff report. Jennifer Griffin asked if the new Redevelopment Agency (RDA)is necessarily tied to Vallco or could be used in different areas in the City.Mr. Baum responded that there is only one RDA that could have more than one project area, but it requires a lot of findings to form additional projects. Deputy City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of the ordinance. Mahoneymoved and Wangseconded to read the ordinance by title only and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Ayes: Chang, Mahoney, Santoro, Wang and Wong. Noes: None. ORDINANCES STAFF REPORTS -None COUNCIL REPORTS Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events. Council directed staff to look into illegal parking at Oak Valley/Rancho San Antonio; contact CalTrans to clean up the 280/De Anza interchange; and put together staff reports regarding the City monetarily contributingfor signs to mark the Don Burnett Bridge, the Siemens irrigation project and the impact on Creekside’s grass, and renaming the holiday tree at Quinlan. ADJOURNMENT At 10:34p.m., the meeting was adjourned. ____________________________ Grace Schmidt, DeputyCity Clerk Staffreports, backup materials, and items distributed at the City Council meeting are available for review at the City Clerk’s Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click on the appropriate Packet. September 6, 2011Cupertino City Council Page 9 Most Council meetings are shown live on Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U-verse Channel 99 and are available at your convenience atwww.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click Archived Webcast. Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. PUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting:September 20, 2011 Subject Municipal Improvements,Sang Oh Lee and Hye Young Lee, 22685Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 342-12-024 Recommended Action Accept Municipal Improvements Discussion The applicant hascompleted City-specified improvements in the City right-of-way including sidewalk, curb & gutter, and driveway approachas required by the improvement agreement with the City. _____________________________________ Prepared by:Chad Mosley, Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by:Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:Attachment A -Map PUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting:September 20, 2011 Subject Municipal Improvements,Carola V. Elliott,10128 Lebanon Drive, APN 342-14-023 Recommended Action Accept Municipal Improvements Discussion The applicant hascompleted City-specified improvements in the City right-of-way including sidewalk, curb & gutter, and driveway approachas required by the improvement agreement with the City. _____________________________________ Prepared by:Chad Mosley, Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by:Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:Attachment A -Map PUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting:September 20, 2011 Subject Municipal Improvements,Cheng-Yuan MichaelWang and Michelle Fan Wang,10170 Santa Clara Avenue, APN 326-24-046 Recommended Action Accept Municipal Improvements Discussion The applicant hascompleted City-specified improvements in the City right-of-way including sidewalk, curb & gutter, street tree and driveway approachas required by the improvement agreement with the City. _____________________________________ Prepared by:Chad Mosley, Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by:Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:Attachment A -Map PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 20, 2011 Subject Stevens Creek Corridor ProjectPhase 2,Project 9134 -Grant applicationauthorization Recommended Action Adopt a Resolution AuthorizingApplication forHabitat Conservation Fund Funding for Stevens Creek CorridorPark and RestorationPhase 2, Project 9134 Discussion Thepeople of Californiavoted to enact the California Wildlife Protection Act of 1990 to help protect, restore, and enhance fish, wildlife and native plant resources, protect habitat, and related purposes.The Habitat Conservation Fund (HCF) Program was createdand allocates approximately $2 million per year to the California Department of Parks and Recreationfor grants to cities, counties and districts.The HCF Program funds land acquisition, enhancement, and/or restoration for habitat projects for rare and protected wildlife, anadromous trout and salmon, wetlands, riparian areas, trails and certain wildlife area activities. Grant awards are typically up to $200,000 although there are nomandatedmaximum or minimum grant amounts. This year’s application deadline is October3, 2011. In order tobe eligible for consideration,aresolution authorizing the application must be submitted.This report requests thatthe City Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) to authorize applying for 2012Habitat Conservation Fund grant fundingtoward the eligible elements ofthe Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 project.With the Council’s endorsement of this requestand adoption of the resolution, the staff can submit a grant application to the Habitat Conservation Fund Program. Fiscal Impact Habitat Conservation FundProgram provides reimbursementfor eligiblecosts of projectsthat receive grant awards. New grant revenue, if awarded, would bea positive fiscal impact. Sustainability Impact Implementation of the project to be funded by this grant programwould fully supportthe City’s sustainability goals. _____________________________________ Preparedby: Gail Seeds, Park Restoration and Improvement Manager Reviewed by:Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:AttachmentA–Resolution Attachment A RESOLUTION NO. 11- ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE HABITAT CONSERVATION FUND PROGRAM WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Wildlife Protection Act of 1990, which provides funds to the State of California for grants to local agencies to acquire, enhance, restore or develop facilities for public recreation and fish and wildlifehabitatprotection purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the HCF Program, setting up necessary procedures governing projectapplication under the HCF Program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicantto certify by resolution the approval of application(s) before submission of said application(s) to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicantwill enter into a contractwith the State of California to complete the project(s); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertinohereby: Approves the filing of an applicationfor the Habitat Conservation Fund Program; and Certifies that said applicanthas or will have available, prior to commencement of any work on the projectincluded in this application, the required matchandsufficient funds to complete the project(s); and Certifies that the applicanthas or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project;and Certifies that the applicanthas reviewed, understands, and agrees to the provisions contained in the contractshown in the grant administration guide; and Delegates the authority tothe Director of Public Worksto conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including,but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the project; and Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines. th PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of theCity of Cupertino this20day ofSeptember,2011, by the following vote: VoteMembers of the City Council Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: APPROVED: ______________________ ____________________________ Kimberly Smith, City Clerk Gilbert Wong, Mayor, City of Cupertino PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September20, 2011 Subject Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2–Adopt environmental clearance documents Recommended Action Adoptthe mitigated negative declaration and associated environmental clearance documents for Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2, Project 9134 Discussion In 2006, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and addendum for the “Stevens Creek Corridor Park Master Plan and Restoration Plan.”The documents described creek restoration, a new trail and various other improvements proposed within the StevensCreek Corridor between McClellan Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard. A first phase of the project wasdesignedandpermitted andwas completed in 2009. The City Council thereafter approved funding for initial design ofStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2,a second phase of the project to continuenorthward from Blackberry Farm Park. At public meetings fromJanuary through May 2011, the City Council authorized staff to initiate an environmental clearanceprocessfor the Phase 2 project andprovided direction regarding creek restoration, bridge location, and parameters for trail layout on the west side of the creek. The firm of TRA Environmental Sciences was hiredto prepare the environmental clearance documents and to facilitate collection of public comments and preparation of responses to those comments. A draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was distributed for public review from July 21 to August 19, 2011 and was posted with the State Clearinghouse and the County Clerk- Recorder. The project site was posted. Adjacent residents and property owners were notified by mail, and persons on the email notification list were also notified electronically.Copies of the documents were provided at the Library and at City Hall and were posted electronically on the City’s website. Seven written comments were received during the review period. A written document containing responses to commentshas been prepared and is attached. A mitigation monitoring and reporting plan has also been prepared and is attached. The City’s Environmental Review Committee(ERC)reviewedthe proposed Initial Study and MitigatedNegative Declarationon August 18. The Committee unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declarationand associated environmental clearance documents(see attached minutes). The environmental review process has found that the project’s potential impacts are less than significant, are less than significant with mitigation incorporated, or are beneficial. In accordance with theERC’srecommendation foradoption of the environmental clearance documents, it will be appropriate for the City Council to determine that: The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. AMitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Mitigation measures were incorporated and are made a condition of approval of the project. A mitigation reporting andmonitoring plan was prepared and is adopted for the project. Findings have been made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Based on these determinations, the City Council may adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated mitigation monitoring andreporting plan for this project(attached). Sustainability Impact This project meets the City’s sustainability goals. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the recommended action. _____________________________________ Preparedby: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:Attachment A –SCC Phase 2, Initial Studyand Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment B –SCC Phase 2, ResponsesTo Comments Attachment C –SCC Phase 2, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Attachment D -ERC Minutes -August 18, 2011 Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Cupertino, CA Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ òÇÐÃ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Cupertino, CA Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø èêû÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×É ïÓØØÐ×ÖÓ×ÐØêÍÛØéÇÓÈ× ï×ÎÐÍìÛÊÑùû òÇÐÃ Mitigated Negative Declaration Page MND-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration ìÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÈÛÈ×ìÇÚÐÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍØ×ÛÎØÈÔ× ëÇÛÐÓÈÃûÙÈù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÈÔ×ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉÛïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Ø î×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÔÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ PROJECT OVERVIEW èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÏÓÐ×É×ÕÏ×ÎÈÍÖ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÄÈ×ÎØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×ÉÛÎØ ÚÇÉÉÈÍÌÉÈÔ×Ê×èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÛÎØÙÊ×ÛÈ×Û Î×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÊ×ÛóÈÅÍÇÐØÍÌ×ÎÈÔ×ÛÙÊ×ÌÛÊÙ×ÐÑÎÍÅÎÛÉÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÈÍÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÎÍÆÛÈ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× ÛÎØúÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÛÎØÅÛÐÑÅÛÃÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÍÎ ÉÈÊ××ÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÎØÛÚÇÉØÊÍÌÍÖÖÛÊ×Û èÔÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÛÉÙÍÎÈ×ÏÌÐÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑïÛÉÈ×Ê ìÐÛÎÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎóÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎóé ïîøÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÓÎ ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÉØ×ÙÓØ×ØÈÍÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÛÎ×Åóé ïîøØÇ×ÈÍÊ×Ù×ÎÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÈÔ× ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎ èÔÓÉóÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÔÛÉÚ××ÎÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÍÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÔÛÉ× ÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ìÛÊÑÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÈÍÏÛÑ×ÛÎÓÎÖÍÊÏ×ØØ×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÊ×ÆÓ×Å FINDINGS èÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÆÓÎÕÊ×ÆÓ×Å×ØÈÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÓÎØÉÈÔÛÈ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐ×ÄÈ×ÎØÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÚÃÏÓÐ×ûÐÐÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÙÛÎÚ××ÓÈÔ×ÊÛÆÍÓØ×ØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ èÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÛÖÖ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÛÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÈÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐ éÈÇØÃùÔ×ÙÑÐÓÉÈÛÉ×ÄÙ××ØÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉûÐÐÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÙÛÎ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÚ× ÛÆÍÓØ×ØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÖÍÇÎØÓÎÈÔÓÉ ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÓÎÈÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×É Ø×ÉÓÕÎÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÛÆÍÓØÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÈÍÛÌÍÓÎÈ ÍÖÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ûïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÖÓÐ×ØÛÉÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ù÷ëûØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÍÖ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Table of Contents Page i Table of Contents 1.0 ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃ øÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ 2.0 Project íÆ×ÊÆÓ×Å ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÓÈ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈíÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×É ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉóÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÍê×ØÇÙ×ÍÊûÆÍÓØ ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÛÎØûÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÉ 3.0 Environmental Checklist 23 ûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊ×ÛÎØöÍÊ×ÉÈ ûÓÊ úÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ ùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É õ×ÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØ õÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×õÛÉ ôÛÂÛÊØÉÛÎØôÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉ ôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÛÎØ ïÓÎ×ÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ìÇÚÐÓÙ çÈÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØé×ÊÆÓÙ× ïÛÎØÛÈÍÊÃöÓÎØÓÎÕÉÍÖ 4.0 5.0 Report List of öÓÕÇÊ× ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ öÓÕÇÊ× û×ÊÓÛÐïÛÌ öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ×ìÐÛÎ öÓÕÇÊ× ùÔÛÎÎ×ÐùÊÍÉÉ öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page ii Table of Contents List of ìÔÍÈÍ ÷ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÍÖÛê×ÙÇÊÆ×Ø ìÔÍÈÍ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØìÔÛÊðÛÌ List of èÛÚÐ× âÍÎ×ðÍÅêÓÌÛÊÓÛÎ åÓÈÔÓÎúÛÎÑ èÛÚÐ× âÍÎ× ïÓØØÐ×ÛÎØôÓÕÔè×ÊÊÛÙ× èÛÚÐ× âÍÎ× èÛÚÐ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ èÛÚÐ× éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉìÐÛÎÈéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃíÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÛÚÐ× éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉåÓÐØÐÓÖ×éÌ×ÙÓ×ÉìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃíÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÛÚÐ× õôõõÐÍÚÛÐåÛÊÏÓÎÕ èÛÚÐ× ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ List of ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×É ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄúùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎúÛÉÓÎ ê×É×ÛÊÙÔûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×É ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄùìÛÊÑÓÎÕûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÖÍÊìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈô×ÄÛÕÍÎèÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉ ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄøèÊ××óÏÌÛÙÈÉðÓÉÈ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Introduction Page 1 ôÏÉËÎÙÈÚÉÔÎÏ 1.1 Summary èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÏÓÐ×É×ÕÏ×ÎÈ ùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÄÈ×ÎØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ìÛÊÑÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔ×ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×ÉÛÎØÚÇÉÉÈÍÌÉÍÎ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÍÌ×ÎÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÐÛÎØÛÈÈÔ× éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØÌÛÊÙ×ÐÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙèÔ×ÛÙÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ× ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÖÍÙÇÉ×ØÍÎÌÛÉÉÓÆ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÚ×ÈÅ××ÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÛÉ ÙÍÎÈ×ÏÌÐÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎóÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ× óé ïîøÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÓÎ ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÉØ×ÙÓØ×ØÈÍÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÛÎ×Åóé ïîøØÇ×ÈÍ ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎ ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×Éé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÕ×ÎÙÃÉÔÛÐÐÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÛÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø î×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÛïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÔ×Î èÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÉÔÍÅÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÎÍÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ÓÎÐÓÕÔÈÍÖÈÔ×ÅÔÍÐ×Ê×ÙÍÊØ Ú×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÛÕ×ÎÙÃÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÃÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÍÊ èÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÚÇÈ ê×ÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÐÛÎÉÏÛØ×ÚÃÍÊÛÕÊ××ØÈÍÚÃÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÚ×ÖÍÊ×Û ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØóÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÛÊ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×ØÖÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ê×ÆÓ×ÅÅÍÇÐØÛÆÍÓØÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÊÏÓÈÓÕÛÈ×ÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÈÍÛÌÍÓÎÈÅÔ×Ê×ÙÐ×ÛÊÐÃÎÍ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÛÎØ èÔ×Ê×ÓÉÎÍÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ÓÎÐÓÕÔÈÍÖÈÔ×ÅÔÍÐ×Ê×ÙÍÊØÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÛÕ×ÎÙÃÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÉÊ×ÆÓÉ×ØÏÛÃÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ èÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ et seq ëÇÛÐÓÈÃûÙÈù÷ëûìÇÚÐÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍØ× ÛÎØÈÔ×éÈÛÈ×ù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É et seq ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍØ×ÍÖê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉùùê 1.2 Lead Agency èÔ×ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃÓÉÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÕ×ÎÙÃÅÓÈÔÌÊÓÎÙÓÌÛÐÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÖÍÊÙÛÊÊÃÓÎÕÍÇÈÍÊ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÓÎÕÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É èÔ×ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉÛÈÈÎõÛÓÐé××ØÉ èÍÊÊ×ûÆ×ÎÇ× ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùû ÷ÏÛÓÐÙÛÌÓÈÛÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉüÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ ìÔÍÎ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 2 Introduction 1.3DocumentOrganization èÔÓÉóÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÓÉÍÊÕÛÎÓÂ×ØÛÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ Chapter 1.0 Introduction ×ÄÌÐÛÓÎÉÈÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÈÔÓÉóÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃÛÎØÈÔ×ÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÈÔ×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ Chapter 2.0 Project Description Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÉÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÛÎØÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÈÔ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊÛÐÉÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔ×ú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ× Ú××ÎÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉÈÍÈÔÛÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎ ÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ Chapter 3.0 Environmental Checklist ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÖÈÔ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖ×ÛÙÔÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÎØÈÔ×ïÛÎØÛÈÍÊÃöÓÎØÓÎÕÉÍÖéÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ× Chapter 4.0 References ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÇÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐ éÈÇØÃ Chapter 5.0 Report Preparers ÐÓÉÈÉÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÊ×ÌÍÊÈ ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×É ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄúùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎúÛÉÓÎ ê×É×ÛÊÙÔûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×É ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄùìÛÊÑÓÎÕûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÖÍÊìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ìÔÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈô×ÄÛÕÍÎèÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉ ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄøèÊ××óÏÌÛÙÈÉðÓÉÈ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Description Page 3 íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ èÔÓÉÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÉÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÈÔ×Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÈÔ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÛÎØ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊÛÐÉÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔ×ú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×É úïìÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×Ê×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ØÇÙ× ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉ 2.1 Overview èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÚ×ÈÅ××ÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÍÌ×ÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÙÊ×É ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÌÇÊÙÔÛÉ×ØÚÃùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÓÎ èÔÓÉÌÛÊÙ×ÐÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÖÍÙÇÉ×ØÍÎ ÌÛÉÉÓÆ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÅ×Ê×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ× óé ïîøÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÉØ×ÙÓØ×ØÈÍÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÛÎ×Åóé ïîø ØÇ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎ èÔÓÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØ ùÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÚ×ÈÅ××ÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÐÍÎÕ ÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÛÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ÅÓÈÔÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÚÓÑ×ÐÛÎ×ÉÛÎØÚÇÉÉÈÍÌÉÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐ Ð×ÎÕÈÔÍÖÈÔÓÉÈÊÛÓÐÓÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÍÊ ÏÓÐ× óÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÚÓÑ× Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÛÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÈÍÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÆÓÛÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÎ×ÅÈÊÛÓÐ ê×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÙÙ×ÉÉ ÛÎØÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÖÍÊÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉ óÎÉÈÛÐÐÈÊÛÓÐÛÏ×ÎÓÈÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÚ×ÎÙÔ×ÉÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ö×ÎÙÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÛÎØÈÊÛÉÔ Ê×Ù×ÌÈÛÙÐ×É ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÖÍÍÈÊ×ÛÙÔÍÖÉÈÊ×ÛÏÚÃÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕ ÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÉÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÓÎÕÌÐÛÎÈÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø ê×ÏÍÆ×ÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÛÎØÊÓÌÊÛÌÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÛÎØÅÓØ×ÎÙÊ××ÑÈÍÈÔ××ÛÉÈÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÌÍÍÐ ÛÎØÊÓÖÖÐ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÌÍÍÐÊÓÖÖÐ×É×ËÇ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÎØÛÎ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÐÍÕÒÛÏÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÐÍÕÙÊÓÚÅÛÐÐÛÎØ ÚÇÊÓ×ØÐÍÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×Ê ùÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Î×ÅÐÓÎ×ÛÐÖ××ÈÍÖÅÓÐÐÍÅÉÅÛÐ× ÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ Arundo donax ê×ÏÍÆ×ÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÕÓÛÎÈÊ××ØôÓÏÛÐÛÃÛÎÚÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ Rubus discolorVinca majorHedera helix ÆÓÎÙÛÛÎØÓÆÃ óÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ~ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉ óÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛÙÊ×ÍÖÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ××ØÕ× ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ 2.2 Background óÎ ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÈÔ×óé ïîøÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎ ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÈÍÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×É èÔ×É×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÏÍØÓÖÃÓÎÕÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÖÊÍÏÛ Ö××ÚÛÉ×ØÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÕÊÍÇÎØÉÅÓÈÔÉÅÓÏÏÓÎÕÌÍÍÐÙÍÏÌÐ×ÄÛÎØÍÌ×ÎÓÎÕÈÔ× ÉÓÈ×ÛÉÛÃ×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑÊ×ÛÐÓÕÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕÓÎ ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÎÔÛÎÙÓÎÕÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÇÌÐÛÎØÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 4 Project Description Î×ÅÕÍÐÖÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÇÌÕÊÛØ×ÉÍÊÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÆÛÊÓÍÇÉ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÏ×ÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ìÔÛÉ× ÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÄÈ×ÎØÛÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ èÊÛÓÐØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ×ÎØÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ÅÍÇÐØÌÛÉÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ØÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÅÔÛÈÓÉÑÎÍÅÎÛÉÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÔÓÙÔÅÛÉÛÙËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÎèÔÓÉÓÉÈÔ×ÍÎÐÃÍÊÙÔÛÊØÊ×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÛÐÍÎÕ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÖÊÍÏéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÓÎïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÈÍÈÔ×ÖÍÍÈÔÓÐÐÉÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÔ× ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÏ×ÌÛÊÈÍÖ ÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØÉÛÎØÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÍÌ×ÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ùÍÊÊÓØÍÊ 2.3 Project Location èÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÙÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉ ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉ ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÅ×ÉÈÍÖúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÎÍÊÈÔÍÖÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÊ×ÛÛÎØ×ÛÉÈÍÖéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÛÎØø×ÛÎùÍÇÊÈÉê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÉ ÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÐÓ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔ èÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÃÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÓÉÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÖÐÛÈÅÓÈÔ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÊÛÎÕÓÎÕÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ Ö××ÈÛÚÍÆ×É×Û Ð×Æ×Ð 2.4 Project Site Description èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÛ ÔÍÏ×ÛÎØÍÇÈÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉÎ×ÛÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÙÊ× ÍÊÛÎÕ× ÏÓÄ×ØÖÊÇÓÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÛÓÎØ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×ÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÅÛÐÎÇÈÐÍËÇÛÈÍÐÓÆ×Ð×ÏÍÎÛÎØ ÈÛÎÕ×ÊÓÎ×èÔ×ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÌÛÊÈÓÉÓÎÖÛÓÊÈÍÕÍÍØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØÓÉÉÈÓÐÐ ÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÆ×ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÉÎÍÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÎØÙÍÇÐØÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÖÊÍÏÊ×ÕÇÐÛÊ ÙÛÊ×éÍÏ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÌÛÉÈÈÔ×ÓÊÌÊÓÏ×ÍÊÛÊ×ØÃÓÎÕèÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÔÍÏ×ØÛÈÓÎÕÚÛÙÑÈÍ ÔÛÉÚ××Î×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÐÃÊ×ÏÍØ×Ð×ØÚÇÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÛÉÛùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÍÏÏ×ÏÍÊÛÈÓÆ× éÓÈ×ÓÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ 2.5 Project Objectives èÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÍÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎÚÃ×ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÓÑ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆÓÎÕ ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØ×ÄÌÛÎØÈÔ× Î×ÈÅÍÊÑÍÖÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÓÑ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÚÍÈÔÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉèÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÈÍÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÓÑ× ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ× ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ØÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃÛÎØ×ÙÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÅÍÍØÐÛÎØ ÖÍÊ×ÉÈÉÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÊÓÆ×ÊÓÎ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍÛÉÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÙÊ××ÑÔÃØÊÛÇÐÓÙÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÛÎØÊ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÕÍÛÐÉÈÍÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÅÛÐÑÛÚÓÐÓÈÃ ÛÎØ×ÄÌÛÎØÈÔ×ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×Î×ÈÅÍÊÑÛÉÍÇÈÐÓÎ×ØÓÎùÇõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É ÛÎØúÓÙÃÙÐ×èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Description Page 5 2.6 Proposed Project 2.6.1 Trail ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÐÍÎÕ ÏÓÐ× ÛÎØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÈÍÚÇÉÛÎØÚÓÑ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÉÈÛÊÈÛÈÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÎØÍÖÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÙÊ××ÑóÈÅÍÇÐØÖÍÐÐÍÅÈÔ××ÛÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÙÊ××ÑÖÊÍÏÅÔ×Ê×ÓÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖ ÈÔ ÙÍÇÊÉ×ÈÍÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÔÍÐ×ûÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ö×ÎÙ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖ ÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔÓÉÉÈÊ×ÈÙÔÛÉÎ××Ø×ØÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÖÊÍÏ×ÊÊÛÎÈÕÍÐÖÚÛÐÐÉóÈÓÉÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÚ×Û Ê×ÙÇÊÆ×ØÖ×ÎÙ×É××ìÔÍÈÍ ÍÊÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÉÈÃÐ× Photo 2.6-1. Example of a Recurved Fence. èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÎÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÍÎÛÎ×ÅÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÓÈÅÍÇÐØ ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃûÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÔÍÊÈÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔÍÖÖÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÛÉÌÍÈÖÍÊÙÊ××Ñ ÆÓ×ÅÓÎÕÏÛÃÚ×ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ØèÔ×É×ÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÛÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÖÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÌÛÈÔÈÍÉÈÍÌÛÎØ ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÙÊ××ÑÆÓ×ÅÉÛÎØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÎÛÈÇÊ××ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÕÊÍÇÌÉÈÍÕÛÈÔ×ÊÅÓÈÔÍÇÈ ÍÚÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÍÎÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈÊÛÓÐóÈÓÉÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÖÍÊ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÍÎÐÃÇÉ×Ó×ÎÍÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉÛÎØÎÍØÍÕÉìÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÛÉÔÍÊÈÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔ ÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ×Î×ÅÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÉÈÍÈÔ×È×ÊÏÓÎÇÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÈÊÛÓÐÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÎØÍÖÈÔ× úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÍÊÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×Î×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÆÓ×ÅÈÍÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÊ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÛÉÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×óÈÓÉÛÐÉÍÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× ÈÔÛÈÛÙÊ××ÑÆÓ×ÅÓÎÕÉÌÍÈÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×Î×ÅÚÊÓØÕ×ÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑûÆÓ×ÅÓÎÕÉÌÍÈÛÈÈÔÓÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÐÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÌÐÛÙ×ÈÍÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÓÏÌ×ØÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÔÓÉÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÈÛÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÓÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÔÇÏÛÎ ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ØÇ×ÈÍÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÚÊÓØÕ×èÔ××ÄÛÙÈÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÔÍÊÈÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔÛÎØ ÍÊ ÆÓ×ÅÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÓÖÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈèÔÓÉÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÖÛÐÐÍÖÈÔ×É×ÌÊÍÚÛÚÐ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÉÔÍÊÈÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔÛÎØ ÍÊÆÓ×ÅÓÎÕÛÊ×Û ÛÉÓÈÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ûÖÈ×ÊÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÚÊÓØÕ×ÛÎØ×ÎÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÎÈÊÛÆ×Ð ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÊÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÍÐØÍÊÛÎÕ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÛÎØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃèÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××ÎØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÇÈÛÕÛÓÎ ÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ÉÈÔ×ÉÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍèÔ×ùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÈÔÓÉÈÍÌÓÙÛÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 6 Project Description ÌÇÚÐÓÙùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐÏ××ÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÊÐÓ×ÊÈÔÓÉÃ×ÛÊÛÎØÈÔ×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê ÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÎÍÖÛÊÈÔ×ÊÅ×ÉÈÈÔÛÎÈÔ×ÎØÊÍÅÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓ×ÈÔ×ÊÍÅ ÍÖÍÊÛÎÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÓÉÉ×ÙÍÎØÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÓÎ×ÅÔÓÙÔÛÚÇÈÉèÔ×ï×ÛØÍÅÉÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍûÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÇÛÐÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÅ×ÉÈ×ÊÎÏÍÉÈÂÍÎ×ÖÍÊÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÓÉ öÓÕÇÊ× èÔ×ÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ× ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÐÃÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÌÛÊÛÐÐ×ÐÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÛÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÛÎÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÛÊ×Û ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ×ØÕ×ûÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÇÛÐÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÐÃÂÍÎ×ÖÍÊÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÓÉ ÉÔÍÅÎÍÎöÓÕÇÊ× èÔ×ÉÓÂ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÍÖÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÛÎØ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÓÐÐÚ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ØÓÎÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈê×ÖÓÎ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈ ÍÌÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÐÐÚ××ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÇÌÙÍÏÓÎÕØ×ÉÓÕÎÅÍÊÑûÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÌÊ×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÏÛÃ ÆÛÊÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÉÛÎØÅÓÐÐØ×Ì×ÎØÍÎÛÅÓØ×ÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍ ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÈÊ××ÊÍÍÈÂÍÎ×ÉÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÈÍÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ØÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×É ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÉÓÕÔÈÐÓÎ×ÉÇÉ×ÊÉÛÖ×ÈÃÉÓÈ×ØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÉÍÓÐÍÊÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ× ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÎ×ÛÊÚÃÕÍÐÖÌÐÛÃÆÓ×ÅÉÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐØ×ÉÓÕÎôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÐÛÃÍÇÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÛÊ×ÛÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×Ø ÈÍÚ×ÎÍÖÛÊÈÔ×ÊÅ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÛÉÈÈÔÛÎÉÔÍÅÎÓÎÈÔ×öÓÕÇÊ× ÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÉíÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃ Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÌÐÛÙ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÅÔ×Ê×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÈÔ×Î×ÅÈÊÛÓÐÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÊ×ÉÌÍÎØÈÍÈÊ××Ô×ÛÐÈÔÓÉÉÇ×ÉÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÊ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ ûÖÈ×Ê×ÄÓÈÓÎÕÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÛÊÙ×ÐÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÎÔ×ÛØ×ÛÉÈÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÓØ×ÅÛÐÑÏÛÃÚ×ÇÌÕÊÛØ×ØÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÉÛÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎ èÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÚÐ×ÈÍÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÇÉÓÎÕÛÎ×ÅÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÛÈìÔÛÊðÛÌ øÊÓÆ×É××ìÔÍÈÍ Photo 2.6-2. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive. ûÈÊÛÓÐÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÈÍÛÉÉÓÉÈÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÐÓÆÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ× ÎÍÊÈÔÈÍÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ× ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÖÍÊÚÓÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉÅÔÍÏÇÉÈÖÍÐÐÍÅÈÔ×ÊÇÐ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÊÍÛØÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÊÓØÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÖÐÍÅÍÖ ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙúÓÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉÅÓÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÔ×ÛØÅ×ÉÈÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÈÍÅÛÊØöÍÍÈÔÓÐÐúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ÛÎØêÛÎÙÔÍéÛÎûÎÈÍÎÓÍùÍÇÎÈÃìÛÊÑÏÇÉÈÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ×ÉÈÊ××ÈÈÍ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×É èÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÔÛÊðÛÌ ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÛÎØÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÛÐÏÓÎÕÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉûÉÉÌÛÙ× Ï×ØÓÛÎÓÉÐÛÎØÅÔÓÙÔÉ×ÊÆ×ÉÛÉÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÊ×ÖÇÕ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÓÎÈÔ×Ù×ÎÈ×ÊÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÈÍ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÉÛÖ×ÈÃÛÎØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÍÏ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÛÐÏÓÎÕÓÎ öÐÛÉÔÓÎÕÅÛÊÎÓÎÕÐÓÕÔÈÉÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÍÎÚÍÈÔÉÓØ×É ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÈÍÛÐ×ÊÈÏÍÈÍÊÓÉÈÉÍÖÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÇÉ×èÔÓÉÈÊÛÓÐÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÈÔ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Description Page 7 ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÎÛÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ×ÄÓÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ× éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÙÐÍÉ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÚÇÉÉÈÍÌÉ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÎÛÐÐÅ×ÛÈÔ×ÊÖÇÐÐÃÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÚÐ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÈÔÛÈÏ××ÈÉ ûøûûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÉåÓÈÔøÓÉÛÚÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉûÙÈûøûÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØÓÉÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉÓØ×ÛÎØ ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÉ×ÈÈÓÎÕóÈÓÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÚ×ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÓÎ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÌÛÊÑÉûÉÌÔÛÐÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÇÉ×ØèÔ×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÏÛÃÚ× ÛÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ØÙÊÇÉÔ×ØÍÊØ×ÙÍÏÌÍÉ×ØÕÊÛÎÓÈ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÍÊÌÍÊÍÇÉÙÍÐÍÊ×ØÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍ ìÔÛÉ×ÍÊÉÍÏ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐóÈÏÛÃÛÐÉÍÚ×ÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÍÎ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐöÍÊ ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÈÔ×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÇÉ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÎÕÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ÏÛÃÚ×ÛØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÇÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØ ð×ÛÉÔ×ØØÍÕÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÍÎÐÃÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÓÏÛÊÃÈÊÛÓÐøÇ×ÈÍÓÈÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÛÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÙÐÍÉ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕ×Æ×ÎÈÉ 2.6.2 Bridge èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÎ×ÅÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÛÎØÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÊÓØÕ×ÈÍÈÔ× Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÛÊ×ÛÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖìÔÛÉ×èÔÓÉ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÚÊÓØÕ×ÓÉÛÙÐ×ÛÊÉÌÛÎóÈÓÉÏÛØ×ÍÖÌÛÓÎÈ×ØÉÈ××ÐÅÓÈÔÛÅÍÍØÌÐÛÎÑØ×ÙÑÛÎØÛÎÓÎÉÓØ×ÅÓØÈÔÍÖ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈ×ÎÖ××È 2.6.3 Parking èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ õÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈèÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÅÍÇÐØÛØØÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÉÌÛÙ×ÉÖÍÊÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ ÉÌÛÙ×ÉèÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÉÈÊÓÌÓÎÕÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛØÊÍÌÍÖÖÛÊ×Û ÖÍÊÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÚÇÉ×ÉÛÎØÉÈÊÓÌÓÎÕÖÍÊÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÙÛÊÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÍ ÉÈÛÐÐÉ 2.6.4 Creek Restoration èÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÕÍÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÎìÔÛÉ× ÛÊ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÕÍÛÐÉÛÉÈÔÍÉ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÌÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔÛÈÅÛÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎ èÔ×É×ÛÊ× ÷ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ØÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃÛÎØ×ÙÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÙÍÈÈÍÎÅÍÍØÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÖÍÊ×ÉÈÚÃÊ×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕÛÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈ ÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÛÎØÏÓØÐ×Æ×ÐÙÛÎÍÌÃÛÎØÛÇÕÏ×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÈÊ××ÙÛÎÍÌÃÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ É×ÐÖÉÇÉÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É óÏÌÊÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÆ×ÊÓÎ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÖÈÔ×ù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ Oncorhynchus mykiss ùÍÛÉÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÚÃÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÈÍÖÓÉÔÌÛÉÉÛÕ×ÛÎØ ×ÎÔÛÎÙÓÎÕÈÔ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÎØÙÍÏÌÐ×ÄÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕ ê×ÏÍÆ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉ×ÐÖÉÇÉÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÙÍÈÈÍÎÅÍÍØÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÛÎØÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØ ïÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÌÊ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÍÎÆ×ÃÛÎÙ×ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÛÎØÊ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÈÍÈÔ× ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎ èÔ×É×ÕÍÛÐÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÙÙÍÏÌÐÓÉÔ×ØÚÃÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖìÔÛÉ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 8 Project Description ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÖÍÍÈÊ×ÛÙÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÍÎùÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØÚÃ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÓÎÕÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø ê×ÏÍÆ×ÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÛÎØÊÓÌÊÛÌÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÛÎØÅÓØ×ÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ×ÛÉÈÅÛÊØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÍÖ××ÈÓÎÛÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÛÙÔÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÐÍÎÕÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÍÆ×Ê Ö××ÈÍÖ ÌÍÍÐÛÎØÊÓÖÖÐ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÔÛÚÓÈÛÈèÔ×ÅÓØ×Î×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÅÓÐÐÓÎÙÐÇØ×Î×ÅÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÚÛÎÑÖÇÐÐ Ú×ÎÙÔ×ÉÛÎØÕ×ÎÈÐ×ÊÉÐÍÌ×ÉÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÉ××öÓÕÇÊ× èÔ×ÚÛÎÑÖÇÐÐÚ×ÎÙÔÅÓØÈÔ ÅÓÐÐÊÛÎÕ×ÖÊÍÏÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÖ××ÈÈÍ Ö××ÈÚÛÎÑÖÇÐÐÚ×ÎÙÔ×ÉÛÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ× ÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÇÈÛÊ×ÖÐÍÍØ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÉÈÍÊÏ×Æ×ÎÈÉùÔÛÎÎ×ÐÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÛÊÕ×È×ØÛÈÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Øù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍÛÉÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÅÓÐÐÚ× ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÌÍÍÐÊÓÖÖÐ×É×ËÇ×ÎÙ×É ÐÍÕÙÊÓÚÅÛÐÐ ÐÍÕÒÛÏÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×É ÚÇÊÓ×ØÐÍÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×Ê ùÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÍÖÎ×ÅÅÓÐÐÍÅÉÅÛÐ× ÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÎÈÔ× ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØ ê×ÏÍÆ×ÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÛÊÇÎØÍØÍÎÛÄôÓÏÛÐÛÃÛÎÚÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃÆÓÎÙÛÛÎØÓÆÃ óÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ~ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÈÈÔ×ÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØÇÌÌ×ÊÚÛÎÑÉÛÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð óÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛÙÊ×ÍÖÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ××ØÕ× ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ Creation or Restoration of Wetland and Riparian Habitat èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÚÃÐÛÃÓÎÕÚÛÙÑ ÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÚÃÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÍÖ××ÈÛÎØ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÎÕÛÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÍÖÖ ÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÔ×Î×ÅÐÃ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈ×ØÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÅÓÐÐÚ×É×ÙÇÊ×ØÅÓÈÔÚÍÇÐØ×Ê ÈÍ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÐÍÕÒÛÏÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÇÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×È×ÙÔÎÓËÇ×ÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê× ÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÐÃÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÓÎìÔÛÉ×ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎ èÔ×É×ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÐÐÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÛÎÓÏÌ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÈÍÖÓÉÔÌÛÉÉÛÕ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÓÏ×ÉÍÖÐÍÅ ÖÐÍÅÉ××öÓÉÔúÛÊÊÓ×Êê×ÏÍÆÛÐÚ×ÐÍÅÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ ÛÎØÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÉ××óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖéÌ×ÙÓÛÐéÈÛÈÇÉéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉôÛÚÓÈÛÈ Ú×ÐÍÅèÔ×Î×ÅÐÃÙÊ×ÛÈ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÛÎØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊ××ÙÛÎÍÌÃÓÎÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØèÔ×É×Î×ÅÌÐÛÎÈÉ Ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÙÍÈÈÍÎÅÍÍØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÛÎØÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐ ÛÊ×ÛÈÍÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛÙÊ×ÉèÔ×Î×ÅÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉ ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÉÛÚÇÖÖ×ÊÛÎØÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÆÛÐÇ×ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÎØÈÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÈÍÚÇÖÖ×ÊÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÅÔÓÙÔ×ÄÓÉÈÉÍÎÈÔ× ×ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑúÇÖÖ×ÊØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉÅÓÐÐÆÛÊÃØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÇÌÍÎÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÍÎ ÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÏÛÃÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÊÛÎÕ×Ú×ÈÅ××Î ÛÎØ Ö××ÈíÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÂÍÎ×ÏÛÃ ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃ×ÄÈ×ÎØÊÍÇÕÔÐÃ ÈÍ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙ×ÎÈ×ÊÐÓÎ×ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕ ÅÓØÈÔÅÓÐÐÆÛÊÃØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÖÓÎÛÐØ×ÉÓÕÎíÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÐÍÎÕ ÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÓÎÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÈÊ××ÉÛÎØÉÔÊÇÚÉíÎÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÂÍÎ×ÛÚÛÎØÍÖ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÓÉÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÓÉÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÕÍÐÖÌÐÛÃîÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ× Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ××é×ÙÈÓÍÎ óÎÆÛÉÓÆ× ÷ÄÍÈÓÙìÐÛÎÈê×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÎØ ê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÚ×ÐÍÅùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅÓÐÐÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÛÖÈ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÌÐÛÎÉÈÍÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÈÔ× ÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÇÌÈÍÃ×ÛÊÉ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Description Page 9 Improvement of Special Status Species Habitat éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÐÖÍÊÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Øù×ÎÈÊÛÐ Oncorhynchus mykiss ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍÛÉÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØèÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØùÍÐØåÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×Ø ÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÓÎÔÛÚÓÈÈÔÓÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÉ×ÕÕÉÖÊÃ ÃÍÇÎÕÛÎØÏÛÈÇÊ×ÛØÇÐÈÉÊ×ÈÇÊÎÓÎÕÈÍÉÌÛÅÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÛÈÛÐÐÉÈÛÕ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈÓÈÉÐÓÖ×ÙÃÙÐ×èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÛÐÉÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÛÖÇÐÐÃÎÛÈÓÆ×ÖÓÉÔÛÉÉ×ÏÚÐÛÕ× ÈÔÛÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔÊ××ÉÌÓÎ×ØÉÈÓÙÑÐ×ÚÛÙÑéÛÙÊÛÏ×ÎÈÍÉÇÙÑ×ÊÛÎØùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊÍÛÙÔèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐ ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÌÍÍÐÛÎØÊÓÖÖÐ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÎØÛÎ×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÎØÅÓÐÐÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ÛÎØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØûÐÐÍÖÈÔ×É××Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÊ×ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊÈÔ× ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ Emys marmorata èÔ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÓÐÐÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÈÔ×å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×éÛÎ Neotoma fuscipes annectensEptesicus öÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÚÓÕÚÊÍÅÎÚÛÈ fuscusMyotis yumanensis ÛÎØãÇÏÛÏÃÍÈÓÉÚÛÈÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÚÊ××ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ èÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÚÛÉÑÓÎÕÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊ ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÉóÎ ÉÈÛÖÖÖÍÇÎØÛå×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÈÓÏ×ÓÎÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐ Ã×ÛÊÉèÔ××ÄÌÛÎØ×ØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃìÔÛÉ× ÅÓÐÐÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÔ×ØÓÆ×ÊÉ×ÌÐÛÎÈ ÌÛÐ×ÈÈ×ÍÖÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÛÎØÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÏÛÎÃ ÚÃÈÔ×ØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈå×ÐÐÍÆ×Ê ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÚÓÊØÉÛÊ×ÖÍÇÎØÓÎÈÔ× ÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖ ÙÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØÐÛÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑåÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ×Éê×ØÉÔÍÇÐØ×Ê×ØôÛÅÑÉôÛÅÑÉ ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎñ×ÉÈÊ×ÐÉå×ÉÈ×ÊÎéÙÊ××ÙÔíÅÐÉÛÎØúÛÊÎíÅÐÉÛÊ×ÛÏÍÎÕÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÑÎÍÅÎÈÍÎ×ÉÈ ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ×É×ÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÛÐÍÎÕÅÓÈÔØÍÂ×ÎÉÍÖÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÚÓÊØÉÛÎØ ÛÎØÛÏÌÔÓÚÓÛÎÉÅÓÐÐÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈåÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ× úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕÛÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØ ÅÓÐÐ×ÄÌÛÎØÈÔ×ÊÓÆ×ÊÓÎ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÈÊÛÎÉÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÌÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÖÍÊÛÐÐÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Fish Barrier Removal èÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÖÛÓÐÓÎÕÊÓÌÊÛÌÕÇÎÓÈ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÛÐÍÎÕ ÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉìÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÐÓÎÓÎÕÔÛÆ×ÙÍÐÐÛÌÉ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕÉÙÍÇÊ ÛÎØÛÆ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐØÊÍÌèÔÓÉÆ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐØÊÍÌÔÛÉÅÍÊÉ×Î×ØÛÎØÓÉÎÍÅÚ×ÐÓ×Æ×ØÈÍÚ×ÐÓÏÓÈÓÎÕÒÇÆ×ÎÓÐ× ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÏÏ×ÊÖÐÍÅÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈé××öÓÕÇÊ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÓÈ×ìÔÍÈÍÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÉÏÛÐÐ×ÊÉÓÂ×ÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÈÔÊ××ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÖÓÉÔÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÈÔÛÈÓÎÔÛÚÓÈÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑòÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÛÎØÉÏÛÐÐÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÇÙÑ×ÊÉÈÓÙÑÐ×ÚÛÙÑÛÎØÊÍÛÙÔÏÛÃ Ú×ÈÊÛÌÌ×ØØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔÓÉÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÓÎÈÔ×ÉÇÏÏ×ÊÛÎØÇÎÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÔ×ÈÔÊ××ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖ ÔÓÕÔËÇÛÐÓÈÃÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏòÇÉÈÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÍÇÈÉÈÛÎØÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ×ÄÓÉÈÉÛÈïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÛÙÔ×ÉÓÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÚÇÈÓÈ ÓÉÚ×ÐÓ×Æ×ØÓÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÚÐ×ÈÍÒÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×É×ÄÙ×ÌÈØÇÊÓÎÕÔÓÕÔ×ÊÖÐÍÅÉèÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÊ×ÏÍÆ× ÈÔ×ÖÛÓÐÓÎÕÔÛÊØÉÙÛÌ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉûÐÐÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÛÎØÊÓÌÊÛÌÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑÉÛÎØ ÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÛÈÍÇÈÖÛÐÐÉÛÎØÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÚÃ×ÛÊÈÔÛÎØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø ÚÍÇÐØ×ÊÉÛÎØÐÍÕ ÊÍÍÈÅÛØÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉáÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈßÛÎØÛÉÔÍÊÈÐÍÕÙÊÓÚÅÛÐÐèÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð ÅÓÐÐÔÛÆ×Ø××ÌÌÍÍÐÛÎØÊÓÖÖÐ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÕÊÛÆ×ÐÚ×ØÉÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÅÓÐÐÛØØÐÛÊÕ× ÅÍÍØÃØ×ÚÊÓÉÛÎØÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕ 2.6.5 Invasive/Exotic Plant Removal and Revegetation Planting Arundo donax èÔ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÕÓÛÎÈÊ××ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÎØÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÛÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÓÎöÓÕÇÊ× î×Å ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈÛÎØÅ×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×Ø ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÛÊ×ÛÉÈÍ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÎØÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉèÔÓÉÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÙÍÏÚÓÎ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÒÇÉÈÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 10 Project Description úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÆÛÐÇ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÉÈÔÛÈÇÉ× ÈÔÓÉÛÊ×Û óÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÛÎØ×ÄÍÈÓÙÌÐÛÎÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÉÓØ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍìÔÛÉ×èÔ× ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÚ×ÇÉ×ØÖÍÊÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×Ø ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÖÍÇÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÙÍÊØ×Ø ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÊÓÚÇÈÛÊÃÙÊ××ÑÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØèÔ×ÌÐÛÎÈ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÚ×ÇÉ×ØÖÍÊÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÚÊÍÑ×ÎÇÌÓÎÈÍÈÔÊ××ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÂÍÎ×ÉÖÍÇÎØ ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉ××èÛÚÐ×É ÛÎØ Ú×ÐÍÅèÔ×É×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÂÍÎ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÃ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÛÉÊÛÎÕÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ØÕ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÍÇÈ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×Ê ÔÃØÊÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØÉÍÓÐÉÇÚÉÈÊÛÈ×óÎÈ×ÊÕÊÛØÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÈÌÛÐ×ÈÈ×ÉÓÎ×ÛÙÔÂÍÎ× ÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉØ×ÏÛÎØÛÎØÛÉÓÈ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÐÛÃÍÇÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈ Table 2.6-1 Zone 1 Low Riparian/ Within Bank Flow èÔÓÉÓÉÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÂÍÎ×ÍÖÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÊÓÕÔÈÛÚÍÆ×ÛÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÊÃÔÓÕÔÅÛÈ×Êíôå ÐÓÎ×èÔÓÉÂÍÎ×ÍÙÙÇÊÉÍÎÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÛÊÉÛÎØ×ØÕ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÚÛÎÑÛÎØÐÍÅ×Ê ÚÛÎÑÖÇÐÐÚ×ÎÙÔ×ÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑé××öÓÕÇÊ× ÖÍÊÚÛÎÑÖÇÐÐÚ×ÎÙÔèÔ×É× ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅÓÐÐÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÖ××ÈÍÖÈÔ×ÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÉÔÍÊ×ÐÓÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉÍÈÔ×Ã ÙÛÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉÅÛÈ×ÊÃ×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÊÍÍÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÛÎÑÉÛÎØ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÔ×ÐÈ×ÊÙÍÆ×ÊÖÍÊÖÓÉÔÛÎØÊ×ØÇÙ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÉÔÛØÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑèÃÌÓÙÛÐÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ× Salix exigua éÛÎØÚÛÊÅÓÐÐÍÅ Artemisia douglasiana ïÇÕÅÍÊÈ Cyperus eragrostis îÇÈÉ×ØÕ× (Scirpus microcarpus) úÇÐÊÇÉÔ Rumex salicifolius åÓÐÐÍÅÐ×ÛÆ×ØØÍÙÑ Alnus rhombifolia åÔÓÈ×ÛÐØ×Ê Salix laevigata ê×ØÅÓÐÐÍÅ Salix lasiolepis ûÊÊÍÃÍÅÓÐÐÍÅ Populus balsamifiera úÐÛÙÑÙÍÈÈÍÎÅÍÍØ Vitis californica åÓÐØÕÊÛÌ× Cornus sericia ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎØÍÕÅÍÍØ (Baccharis douglasii) ÖÛÐÉ×ÅÓÐÐÍÅ Platanus racemosa å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ× Table 2.6-2 Zone 2 Middle and High Terrace Riparian èÔÓÉÂÍÎ×ÓÉÙÐÛÉÉÓÖÓ×ØÛÉÈÔ×ÇÌÌ×ÊÚÛÎÑÖÇÐÐÚ×ÎÙÔÇÌÌ×ÊÚÛÎÑÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÛÎØÓÎÎ×Ê ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉèÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÈÔÓÉÂÍÎ×ÙÛÎÈÍÐ×ÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÓÙÈÍÓÎÖÊ×ËÇ×ÎÈÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÛÎØÛÊ× ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÖÍÇÎØÍÎÈÔ×ÇÌÌ×ÊÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÛÎØÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÐÍÅÖÐÍÅ ÉÔÍÊ×ÐÓÎ×èÃÌÓÙÛÐÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Description Page 11 (Clematis ligusticifolia) å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÚÍÅ×Ê Rubus ursinus ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ Quercus lobata æÛÐÐ×ÃÍÛÑ Quercus agrifolia ùÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑ Symphoricarpos albus éÎÍÅÚ×ÊÊÃ Umbellularia californica ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃ Aesculus californica ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÇÙÑ×Ã× Rosa californica åÓÐØÊÍÉ× Acer negundo úÍÄ×ÐØ×Ê Sambucus mexicana úÐÇ××ÐØ×ÊÚ×ÊÊÃ (Clematis lasiantha ùÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐÙÐ×ÏÛÈÓÉ Table 2.6-3 Zone 3 Upland/Meadow èÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÖÍÇÎØÓÎÍÇÈ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉÛÎØÇÌÐÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÉèÃÌÓÙÛÐÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍ Ú×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ× Quercus agrifolia ùÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑ (Prunus ilicifolia) ôÍÐÐÃÐ×ÛÖÙÔ×ÊÊÃ (Ribes californicum) ôÓÐÐÉÓØ×ÕÍÍÉ×Ú×ÊÊÃ Marah fabaceus åÓÐØÙÇÙÇÏÚ×Ê Heteromeles arbutifolia èÍÃÍÎ Oemlaria cerasiformis íÉÍÚ×ÊÊÃ Elymus glaucus úÐÇ×ÅÓÐØÊÃ× Nasella pulchra ìÇÊÌÐ×Î××ØÐ×ÕÊÛÉÉ Melica californica ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÏ×ÐÓÙ Bromus carinatus ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÊÍÏ× éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ×Î×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÎØ ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉûÉÅÓÈÔìÔÛÉ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÇÉ×ØÖÍÊÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÕÊÍÅÎÖÊÍÏ ÐÍÙÛÐÐÃØ×ÊÓÆ×ØÉÈÍÙÑÈÍÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÈÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×èÔ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÖÍÊÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ× ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉ ÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÛÕ×ÎÙÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÛÊÛÈÓÍÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×éÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØûÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùøöõè×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÛÎØ Ì×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈÓÊÊÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈËÇÛÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÏ×ÎÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÉÛÎØÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Exotic Species Control and Removal ìÛÊÈÍÖ×ÎÔÛÎÙÓÎÕÈÔ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÛÎØ ÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐ ×ÄÍÈÓÙÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×Éø×ÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÙÊ×ÛÕ×ÍÖ×ÄÍÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÖÍÇÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÍÇÐØ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÎÛÈÓÆ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÍÚ×ÙÍÏ××ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÛÎØÈÔÇÉÓÏÌÊÍÆ× ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÛÎØÛËÇÛÈÓÙÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ï×ÈÔÍØÉÍÖÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÆÛÊÃÕÊ×ÛÈÐÃØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ× ÈÛÊÕ×ÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉéÍÏ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÉÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÚ×ÇÉ×ØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÔÛÎØÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÇÉ×ÍÖÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø Ô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÉÛÖ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×É×ÈÈÓÎÕÍÊÏ×ÙÔÛÎÓÙÛÐÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐ×ÕÙÔÛÓÎÉÛÅÉÅ××ØÅÛÙÑ×ÊÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 12 Project Description 2.7 Measures Included in the Project to Reduce or Avoid Impacts 2.7.1 Revegetation and Habitat Enhancement ÷ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×Ê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔÓÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø~ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×É ×ÄÍÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐé×× É×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÚÍÆ×èÔÓÉÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÅÓÐÐÍÖÖÉ×ÈÈÔ×ÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÖÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÔÇÏÛÎÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÛÎØØÍÕÉÍÎÐ×ÛÉÔÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÖÍÊìÔÛÉ× ÓÉÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÓÎÉÓÂ× ÈÔÛÎÅÔÛÈÅÛÉÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÛÉÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×É×ÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÏÛÉÈ×Ê ÌÐÛÎóÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÍÎ×ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÎ×ÅÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÅÛÉØ××Ï×ØÈÍÍÖÖÉ×ÈÈÔ×ÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÍÊÍÎ×ÏÓÐ×ÍÖÎ×ÅÈÊÛÓÐÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔ×ÏÓÐ×ÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÈÔÛÈÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔÓÉìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈûÐÉÍÎÍÈ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÇÐÈÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÎ×ÅÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉ ÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÛÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ××ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÚ×ÃÍÎØÅÔÛÈÅÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø 2.7.2 Santa Clara Valley Water District BMPs èÔ× ú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉôÛÎØÚÍÍÑÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÛÐÓÉÈÍÖéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×Ã åÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÛÎØÊ×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×ÉèÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÓÉÈÍ ÛÉÉÓÉÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÌÐÛÎÎ×ÊÉÛÎØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈ×ÛÏÉÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÉÔÍÇÐØÚ× Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÖÍÊÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÓÕÎÉÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÈÍÛÆÍÓØÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÍÊÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉéùæåø ÛèÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛ æÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ØÏÛÎÃÍÖÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÅ×Ê×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÚÃ ÉÈÛÑ×ÔÍÐØ×ÊÉÛÎØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÍÆ×ÊÈÔ×É×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É èÔ×É×úïÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÈÔ×ÐÛÈ×ÉÈÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉèÍÛÆÍÓØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÎÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÆÛÐÇ×ÉÔÃØÊÍÐÍÕÓÙÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØÆÛÐÇ×ÉÛÎØÕ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÇÉ×ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×úïìÉûÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÖúïìÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ× úïìôÛÎØÚÍÍÑÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍ ÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÓÉÖÍÇÎØÓÎûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÍÖÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ 2.7.3 BAAQMD Basic Construction Mitigation Measures Basic Construction öÍÊÛÐÐÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉúûûëïøÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔ× Mitigation Measures, ÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎèÛÚÐ×ÍÖÈÔ×ù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉçÌØÛÈ×ØïÛÃ , ÈÍÏ××ÈÈÔ×Ú×ÉÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÖÍÊØÇÉÈÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÍÊÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ×ÄÙ××ØÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉèÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ×úûûëïøÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É åÛÈ×Ê×ÄÌÍÉ×ØÉÇÊÖÛÙ×É×ÕÇÎÌÛÆ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÉÈÛÕÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÉÍÓÐÌÓÐ×ÉÕÊÛØ×Ø ÛÊ×ÛÉÛÎØÇÎÌÛÆ×ØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÊÍÛØÉØÛÓÐÃÍÊÛÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊØÇÉÈÙÍÎÈÊÍÐ ùÍÆ×ÊÔÛÇÐÈÊÇÙÑÉÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÉÍÓÐÉÛÎØÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÐÍÍÉ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÍÖÖÉÓÈ× çÉ×ÆÛÙÇÇÏÉÈÊ××ÈÉÅ××Ì×ÊÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×Ï×ÈÔÍØØÛÓÐÃÍÊÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆ× ÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÏÇØÍÊØÓÊÈÈÊÛÙÑÍÇÈÍÎÈÍÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÍÛØÉ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÌ××ØÉÍÎÇÎÌÛÆ×ØÊÍÛØÉÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈ×ÄÙ××ØÏÌÔ êÍÛØÅÛÃÉØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÉÛÎØÉÓØ×ÅÛÐÑÉÈÍÚ×ÌÛÆ×ØÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÛÉÉÍÍÎÛÉ Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐ× ïÓÎÓÏÓÂ××ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÓØÐÓÎÕÈÓÏ×ÉÈÍÏÓÎÇÈ×É ìÊÍÌ×ÊÐÃÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÎØÈÇÎ×ÛÐÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔ ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ ìÍÉÈÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÐÃÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÉÓÕÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ×È×Ð×ÌÔÍÎ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÛÎØÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÍÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕ ØÇÉÈÌÊÍÚÐ×ÏÉ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Description Page 13 2.7.4 Stormwater Quality BMPs éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃçÊÚÛÎêÇÎÍÖÖìÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎìÊ×Æ×ÎÈÓÍÎìÊÍÕÊÛÏÐÓÉÈÉúïìÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÖÍÊÛùÐ×ÛÎúÛÃûÊ×ÛéÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈûÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈÓÍÎ èÔ×É×úïìÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÇÉÓÎÕÙÍÖÖ×ÊØÛÏÉÍÊØÓÑ×ÉÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× Ö×ÎÙ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×ØÍÅÎÉÐÍÌ×ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÂÍÎ×ÛÎØÉÙÔ×ØÇÐÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØÉÍÖØÊÃÅ×ÛÈÔ×ÊÓÖÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×èÔ×É×úïìÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎúïìÉÏÇÉÈÚ×ÓÎ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×Ú×ÖÍÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÏÏ×ÎÙ×É èÔ×ùÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÛÐÐúïìÉÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÙÍÎÖÓÊÏÓÎÕÈÔÛÈúïìÉÛÊ×ÓÎ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ× 2.8 Permits and Approvals Required èÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÉÛÊ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ûÊÏÃùÍÊÌÉÍÖ÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÉùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈé×ÙÈÓÍÎ îÛÈÓÍÎÅÓØ×ÍÊóÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐì×ÊÏÓÈ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐíÙ×ÛÎÓÙÛÎØûÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØé×ÙÈÓÍÎ åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ åÛÓÆ×Ê ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ× éÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØûÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈì×ÊÏÓÈÛÉÎ××Ø×Ø ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÛÎÓÈÛÊÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÖÍÊÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÉÛÎÓÈÛÊÃÉ×Å×ÊÐÓÎ×ÖÍÊÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÓØ×ì×ÊÏÓÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Project Description Page 14 öÓÕÇÊ× ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎïÛÌ åÛÐÎÇÈùÊ××Ñ ðÛÖÛÃ×ÈÈ× ðÛÖÛÃ×ÈÈ× ðÛÖÛÃ×ÈÈ× San Francisco íÛÑÐÛÎØ éÛÎêÛÏÍÎ éÛÎêÛÏÍÎ éÛÎêÛÏÍÎ øÇÚÎ øÇÚÎ øÇÚÐÓÎ ÐÓ éÛÎ ìÐ×ÛÉÛÎÈÍÎ ùÛÉÈÊÍ éÍÇÈÔéÛÎ ðÓÆ×ÊÏÍÊ× éÛÎúÊÇÎÍ éÛÎúÊÇÎÍ éÛÎúÊÇÎÍ öÍÉÈ×ÊùÈÃ öÍÉÈ×ÊùÈÃ öÍÉÈ×ÊùÓÈÃ Ó çÎÓÍÎùÓÈÃ éÛÎ î×ÅÛÊÑ î×ÅÛÊÑ î×ÅÛÊÑ ê×ØÅÍÍØ ï×ÎÍìÛÊÑ éÛÎùÛÊÐÍÉ ï×ÎÍìÛÊÑ éÛÎùÛÊÐÍÉ ï×ÎÐÍìÛÊÑ éÛÎùÛÊÐÍÉ Ð ÃÂ ïÓÐÌÓÈÛÉ ìÛÐÍûÐÈÍ Project ïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×Å Area Vicinity San Jose ùÇÌ×ÊÈÎÍ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÎÍ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ Ó êé éÛÊÛÈÍÕÛ éÛÊÛÈÍÕÛ éÛÊÛÈÍÕÛ ³ ðÍÉõÛÈÍÉ ðÍÉõÛÈÍÉ ðÍÉõÛÈÍÉ úÛÉ×ÏÛÌéÈÊ××ÈïÛÌîÍÊÈÔ 280 áà Project Area êé 85 ³ ö××È éÍÇÊÙ×ûÊÙõóéíÎÐÓÎ×éÈÊ××ÈïÛÌ ïÛÌèêûòÇÐÃ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 öÓÕÇÊ× û×ÊÓÛÐïÛÌ Project Description Page 15 Project Area íËÔÇÜÉØ ëØÊÔÙØÏÚØ Project Area ëêð Ú»»¬ ×³¿¹»®§ Í±«®½»æ Ù±±¹´» Û¿®¬¸ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase2 City of Cupertino Ó¿°æ ÌÎßô Ó¿§ îðïï Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ×ìÐÛÎ Project Description ùíîî÷ùèóíî ùûîíìãûììêíä î÷åúûùñåûè÷ê ôûúóèûè úêóøõ÷ öûêï õíðöùíçêé÷ ð÷õ÷îø ìêíìíé÷øéèê÷ûïåóø÷îóîõ ÷äóéèóîõéèê÷ûïùôûîî÷ðèíê÷ïûóîóîìðûù÷ ó èâíî÷ ¢2 î÷åéè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñèêûóð ûðóõîï÷î I J î÷åì÷ø÷éèêóûî úóùãùð÷úêóøõ÷ 1 î÷åúûùñåûè÷êìðûîèóîõé âíî÷íöûêçîøíèíú÷ê÷ïíæ÷ø J I 1 / l J 1 I îûèóæ÷ê÷éèíêûèóíîìðûîèóîõé ÷äóéèóîõèê÷÷ î÷å ú÷õóî ÷îøùôûîî÷ðåóø÷îóîõ éè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñùíêêóøíêìûêñûîøê÷éèíêûèóíîìêíò÷ùè èêûóðûðóõîï÷îèâíî÷ öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ×ìÐÛÎÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø Project Description ùíîî÷ùèóíî ùûîíìãûììêíä î÷åúûùñåûè÷ê ôûúóèûè úêóøõ÷ öûêï õíðöùíçêé÷ ð÷õ÷îø ìêíìíé÷øéèê÷ûïåóø÷îóîõ ÷äóéèóîõéèê÷ûïùôûîî÷ðèíê÷ïûóîóîìðûù÷ î÷åéè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñèêûóð ûðóõîï÷îèâíî÷ J î÷åì÷ø÷éèêóûî úóùãùð÷úêóøõ÷ 1 î÷åúûùñåûè÷êìðûîèóîõé âíî÷íöûêçîøíèíú÷ê÷ïíæ÷ø J ÷äóéèóîõèê÷÷ I / l J 1 I î÷åîûèóæ÷ê÷éèíêûèóíîìðûîèóîõé 1 ú÷õóî ÷îøùôûîî÷ðåóø÷îóîõ éè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñìûêñûîø èêûóðâíî÷ öÓÕÇÊ× ùÔÛÎÎ×ÐùÊÍÉÉé×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ProJect Descnptlon Page 18 ÷ÄÉÈÏÕî×Å Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑ ÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð êÈý î×Å ÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð Figure 2-4. Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project, Phase Channel and Backwater Sections ûÌÌÊÍÄÏÛÈ× Stevens Creek, City of Cupertino of Cupertmo twe Declara July ù úÛÐÛÎÙ×ôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÓ×ÉóÎÙ Project Description Page 19 öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ×ìÔÍÈÍÉ ìÔÍÈÍ æÓ×ÅÍÖ×ÛÉÈÉÓØ× ÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÍÎ ÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÍÍÑÓÎÕ ÉÍÇÈÔ ìÔÍÈÍ æÓ×ÅÍÖéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊ ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÊÓÕÔÈÛÎØ ÙÊ××ÑÉÓØ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ Ð×ÖÈÐÍÍÑÓÎÕÉÍÇÈÔ ìÔÍÈÍ éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÐÍÍÑÓÎÕ ÉÍÇÈÔ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Project Description Page 20 öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ×ìÔÍÈÍÉÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø ìÔÍÈÍ ùÍÎÙÊ×È×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕ ÛÊÏÍÊÉÏÇÙÔÍÖÈÔ× ×ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑ Ú×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖ ùÍÇÊÉ× æÓ×ÅÍÖÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð ÐÍÍÑÓÎÕÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ìÔÍÈÍùÍÎÙÊ×È× ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÓÉÖÛÓÐÓÎÕ ÍÎÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑ ÛÎØÔÛÉÖÛÐÐ×ÎÓÎÈÍÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐæÓ×ÅÍÖ ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÍÍÑÓÎÕ ØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ìÔÍÈÍ æÓ×ÅÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÎ×ÛÊÎÍÊÈÔ ØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏ×ÎØÍÖÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ× ÐÍÍÑÓÎÕÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÈÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ìÔÍÈÍÛÚÍÆ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Project Description Page 21 öÓÕÇÊ× éÓÈ×ìÔÍÈÍÉÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø ìÔÍÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× ÛÐÍÎÕ×ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÍÖ ÙÊ××ÑÆÓ×ÅÐÍÍÑÓÎÕ ÉÍÇÈÔ ÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ìÔÍÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÐÍÎÕ ×ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÍÖÙÊ××ÑÆÓ×Å ÐÍÍÑÓÎÕÉÍÇÈÔ ÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ìÔÍÈÍæÓ×ÅÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØ úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Project Description This page intentionally left blank. City of Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 23 øÏÇÔËÎÏÐØÏÉÜÑúÕØÚÒÑÔÊÉ 1. Project title: éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ 2. Lead agency name and address: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÍÊÊ×ûÆ× ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùû 3. Contact person and phone number: õÛÓÐé××ØÉø×ÌÈÍÖìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ 4. Project location: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÚ×ÈÅ××ÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑ 5. Project sponsors name and address: éÛÏ×ÛÉð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃ 6. General Plan designation: ìÛÊÑÉÛÎØíÌ×ÎéÌÛÙ×æ×ÊÃðÍÅø×ÎÉÓÈÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØ ùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ 7. Zoning: ûûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÛÎØìêìÇÚÐÓÙìÛÊÑÍÊê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ 8. Description of project: èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ É×ÕÏ×ÎÈÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÄÈ×ÎØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐ ÖÊÍÏúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×É ÛÎØÚÇÉÉÈÍÌÉÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÍÌ×Î ÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÐÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØÌÛÊÙ×ÐÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙèÔ×ÛÙÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÖÍÙÇÉ×ØÍÎÌÛÉÉÓÆ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÙÊ××Ñ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÚ×ÈÅ××ÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÛÉÙÍÎÈ×ÏÌÐÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎ óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎóé ïîøÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÓÎ ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃ ÔÛÉØ×ÙÓØ×ØÈÍÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÛÎ×Åóé ïîøØÇ×ÈÍÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎ 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required: èÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÉÛÊ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ çéûÊÏÃùÍÊÌÉÍÖ÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÉçéûù÷ùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØì×ÊÏÓÈ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐíÙ×ÛÎÓÙÛÎØûÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØé×ÙÈÓÍÎ åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ åÛÓÆ×Ê ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ× éÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØûÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈì×ÊÏÓÈÛÉÎ××Ø×Ø ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÓØ×ì×ÊÏÓÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 24 Environmental Checklist Environmental Factors Potentially Affected èÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÙÔ×ÙÑ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔÓÉìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÉÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÔ×ÙÑÐÓÉÈÍÎÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌÛÕ×É Agriculture and Forestry Air Quality Aesthetics Resources Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse GasHazards & HazardousHydrology / Water EmissionsMaterialsQuality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Mandatory Findings Utilities / Service Transportation/Traffic of Significance DETERMINATION: èÍÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÚÃÈÔ×ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃ íÎÈÔ×ÚÛÉÓÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÓÎÓÈÓÛÐ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎ óÖÓÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈùíçðøîíèÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÛî÷õûèóæ÷ø÷ùðûêûèóíîÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø óÖÓÎØÈÔÛÈÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔ×Ê×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ×Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×Ê×ÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÓÎ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÏÛØ×ÚÃÍÊÛÕÊ××ØÈÍÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌÍÎ×ÎÈûïóèóõûè÷ø î÷õûèóæ÷ø÷ùðûêûèóíîÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø óÖÓÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈïûãÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÎØ ÛÎ÷îæóêíîï÷îèûðóïìûùèê÷ìíêèÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø óÖÓÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈïûãÔÛÆ×ÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÇÎÐ×ÉÉÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÚÇÈÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÍÎ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÔÛÉ Ú××ÎÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ØÓÎÛÎ×ÛÊÐÓ×ÊØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ð×ÕÛÐ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØ ÔÛÉÚ××ÎÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÚÃÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ××ÛÊÐÓ×Ê ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÛÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÍÎÛÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÉÔ××ÈÉûÎ÷îæóêíîï÷îèûðóïìûùèê÷ìíêèÓÉ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÇÈÓÈÏÇÉÈÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ÍÎÐÃÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÊ×ÏÛÓÎÈÍÚ×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×Ø óÖÓÎØÈÔÛÈÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÛÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÛÎÛÐÃÂ×Ø ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÓÎÛÎ×ÛÊÐÓ×Ê÷óêÍÊî÷õûèóæ÷ø÷ùðûêûèóíîÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØÚÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÛÆÍÓØ×ØÍÊÏÓÈÓÕÛÈ×ØÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÈÔÛÈ×ÛÊÐÓ×Ê÷óêÍÊ î÷õûèóæ÷ø÷ùðûêûèóíîÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÊ×ÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÊÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ× ÓÏÌÍÉ×ØÇÌÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÎÍÈÔÓÎÕÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 25 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: ûÚÊÓ×Ö×ÄÌÐÛÎÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÍÊÛÐÐÛÎÉÅ×ÊÉ×ÄÙ×ÌÈóÏÌÛÎÉÅ×ÊÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ× ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÃÙÓÈ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÛÊ×ÎÈÔ×É×É ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ×ÛÙÔËÇ×ÉÈÓÍÎûóÏÌÛÛÎÉÅ×ÊÓÉÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ×ØÓÖÈÔ×Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×Ø ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÉÔÍÅÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÓÏÌÐÃØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÛÌÌÐÃÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÐÓÑ×ÈÔ×ÍÎ× ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ø×ÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÛÐÐÉÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÛÖÛÇÐÈÊÇÌÈÇÊ×ÂÍÎ×ûóÏÌÛÛÎÉÅ×Ê ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ××ÄÌÐÛÓÎ×ØÅÔ×Ê×ÓÈÓÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ×ÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ×ÄÌÍÉ×É×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×Ê×Ù×ÌÈÍÊÉÈÍÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎ ÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ ûÐÐÛÎÉÅ×ÊÉÏÇÉÈÈÛÑ×ÛÙÙÍÇÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÅÔÍÐ×ÛÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ØÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÍÖÖÉÓÈ×ÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉ ÍÎÉÓÈ×ÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐ×Æ×ÐÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉØÓÊ×ÙÈÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÉ Å×ÐÐÛÉÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ íÎÙ×ÈÔ×Ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÃÔÛÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔÛÈÛÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÏÛÃÍÙÙÇÊÈÔ×Î ÈÔ×ÙÔ×ÙÑÐÓÉÈÛÎÉÅ×ÊÉÏÇÉÈÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÅÓÈÔÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃéÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÓÖÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ÈÔÛÈÛÎ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÏÛÃÚ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈóÖÈÔ×Ê×ÛÊ× ÍÎ×ÍÊÏÍÊ×éÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈó×ÎÈÊÓ×ÉÅÔ×ÎÈÔ×Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÏÛØ×ÛÎ ÷óêÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎð×ÉÉèÔÛÎéÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈåÓÈÔïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎóÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ÛÌÌÐÓ×ÉÅÔ×Ê× ÈÔ×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÔÛÉÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÛÎ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÖÊÍÏ éÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈóÏÈÍÛèÔÛÎéÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈóÏèÔ×Ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÃÏÇÉÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ× ÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÚÊÓ×ÖÐÃ×ÄÌÐÛÓÎÔÍÅÈÔ×ÃÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÖÊÍÏé×ÙÈÓÍÎäæóó÷ÛÊÐÓ×ÊûÎÛÐÃÉ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÙÊÍÉÉ Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×Ø ÷ÛÊÐÓ×ÊÛÎÛÐÃÉ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÇÉ×ØÅÔ×Ê×ÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÈÓ×ÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÕÊÛÏ÷óêÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ù÷ëûÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÛÎ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ØÓÎÛÎ×ÛÊÐÓ×Ê÷óêÍÊÎ×ÕÛÈÓÆ× Ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎ Ù øóÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ×ÛÚÊÓ×ÖØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÉÔÍÇÐØÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Û÷ÛÊÐÓ×ÊûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÉ×ØóØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÛÎØÉÈÛÈ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊ Ê×ÆÓ×Å ÚóÏÌÛÙÈÉûØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃûØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØóØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÅÔÓÙÔ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ× ÙÔ×ÙÑÐÓÉÈÅ×Ê×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÙÍÌ×ÍÖÛÎØÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ØÓÎÛÎ×ÛÊÐÓ×Ê ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ð×ÕÛÐÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØÉÈÛÈ×ÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÉÇÙÔ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÅ×Ê×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÚÃÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ××ÛÊÐÓ×Ê ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ ÙïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉöÍÊ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÈÔÛÎéÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÅÓÈÔ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÅÔÓÙÔÅ×Ê×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÍÊÊ×ÖÓÎ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ××ÛÊÐÓ×ÊØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÈÔ× ×ÄÈ×ÎÈÈÍÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×ÃÛØØÊ×ÉÉÉÓÈ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÛÊ××ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ØÈÍÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÔ×ÙÑÐÓÉÈÊ×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×ÉÈÍÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÖÍÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ×ÕÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÌÐÛÎÉÂÍÎÓÎÕÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×Éê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×ÈÍÛ ÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÍÊÍÇÈÉÓØ×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÔÍÇÐØÅÔ×Ê×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÊ×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ× ÈÍÈÔ×ÌÛÕ×ÍÊÌÛÕ×ÉÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÓÉÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÈ×Ø éÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÕóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎéÍÇÊÙ×ÉûÉÍÇÊÙ×ÐÓÉÈÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÇÉ×ØÍÊÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÓÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 26 Environmental Checklist èÔÓÉÓÉÍÎÐÃÛÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈ×ØÖÍÊÏÛÎØÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÖÊ××ÈÍÇÉ×ØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÖÍÊÏÛÈÉ ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÉÔÍÇÐØÎÍÊÏÛÐÐÃÛØØÊ×ÉÉÈÔ×ËÇ×ÉÈÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÈÔÓÉÙÔ×ÙÑÐÓÉÈÈÔÛÈ ÛÊ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈÈÍÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÓÎÅÔÛÈ×Æ×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÉÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø èÔ××ÄÌÐÛÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ×ÛÙÔÓÉÉÇ×ÉÔÍÇÐØÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃ ÛÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÍÊÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÓÖÛÎÃÇÉ×ØÈÍ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ××ÛÙÔ ËÇ×ÉÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÚÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÖÛÎÃÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ× City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 27 Less Less 3.1 AESTHETICS -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛôÛÆ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈ ÍÎÛÉÙ×ÎÓÙÆÓÉÈÛý ÚéÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØÛÏÛÕ×ÉÙ×ÎÓÙ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×Ø ÈÍÈÊ××ÉÊÍÙÑÍÇÈÙÊÍÌÌÓÎÕÉÛÎØ ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÉÈÛÈ× ÉÙ×ÎÓÙÔÓÕÔÅÛÃý ÙéÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØ×ÕÊÛØ×ÈÔ× ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÆÓÉÇÛÐÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÍÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ ÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÓÈÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÉý ØùÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÎ×ÅÉÍÇÊÙ×ÍÖ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÓÕÔÈÍÊÕÐÛÊ×ÅÔÓÙÔ ÅÍÇÐØÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈØÛÃÍÊ ÎÓÕÔÈÈÓÏ×ÆÓ×ÅÉÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×Ûý Environmental Setting èÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎùÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÐÍÎÕÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÏÓÐ×ÍÖ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÒÇÉÈÉÍÇÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÈÈÔ× éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÔÓÙÔÅÛÉÛÙËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÎÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÉÍÇÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÅ×ÉÈÍÖúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÎÍÊÈÔÍÖÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÊ×Û ÛÎØ×ÛÉÈÍÖéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÛÎØø×ÛÎùÍÇÊÈÉèÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÃÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÓÉÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÖÐÛÈÅÓÈÔ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÊÛÎÕÓÎÕÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ Ö××ÈÛÚÍÆ×É×ÛÐ×Æ×Ð èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÚÍÊØ×Ê×ØÚÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÛÎØÅ×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ï×ÛØÍÅÉÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÍÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÛÎØìÔÛÊðÛÌÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÈÍ ÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÛÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÈÛÐÍÅ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÈÃÌÓÙÛÐ ÍÖÛÙÊ××ÑÆÛÐÐ×ÃÚÍÈÈÍÏÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÔÍÏ×ÉÛÈÉÐÓÕÔÈÐÃÔÓÕÔ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÉ èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÛ ÔÍÏ×ÛÎØÍÇÈÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉÎ×ÛÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÙÊ× ÍÊÛÎÕ× ÏÓÄ×ØÖÊÇÓÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÛÓÎØ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèÔÓÉÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÉÈÔ×ÍÎÐÃÍÊÙÔÛÊØ Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Ð×ÎÕÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÖÊÍÏéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÓÎïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÈÍÈÔ× ÖÍÍÈÔÓÐÐÉÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÍÈÔ×ÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÅÛÐÎÇÈÐÍËÇÛÈÍÐÓÆ×Ð×ÏÍÎÛÎØÈÛÎÕ×ÊÓÎ×èÔ×ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÖÍÊÈÔ× ÏÍÉÈÌÛÊÈÓÉÓÎÖÛÓÊÈÍÕÍÍØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØÓÉÉÈÓÐÐÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÆ×ïÇÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÍÎ×ÓÈÔ×Ê ÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÓÉÖÛÓÊÐÃÅ×ÐÐÉÔÛØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÛÎÍÌÃÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÈÊ××ÉèÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÚÛÎÑ ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÏÍÊ×Ô×ÛÆÓÐÃÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× ÉÓØ×óÎÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÈÇÊÖ×ÄÈ×ÎØÉÈÍÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÓÉ ÛÚÉ×ÎÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 28 Environmental Checklist Discussion: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÎØÓÉÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÖÐÛÈèÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ ÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÔ×Ê×ÏÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÆÓÉÇÛÐÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÙ×ÎÓÙÆÓÉÈÛèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÎÍÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÎÛÉÙ×ÎÓÙÆÓÉÈÛ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÎ×ÄÈÈÍÛØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØéÈÛÈ×éÙ×ÎÓÙôÓÕÔÅÛÃèÔ× ÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈéÈÛÈ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÉÙ×ÎÓÙÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÓÉéÈÛÈ×êÍÇÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÏÓÐ×ÉÉÍÇÈÔÅ×ÉÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎéÛÊÛÈÍÕÛóÎÈ×ÊÉÈÛÈ× ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ× ÖÍÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÛéÈÛÈ×éÙ×ÎÓÙôÓÕÔÅÛÃÚÇÈÓÉÎÍÈÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÐÃØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉÛéÈÛÈ×éÙ×ÎÓÙ ôÓÕÔÅÛÃèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÎÍÈÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔÓÉÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÔÛÆ×Û ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÎÛÉÈÛÈ×ÉÙ×ÎÓÙÔÓÕÔÅÛÃ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. æÓ×ÅÉÍÖÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÍÇÐØÙÔÛÎÕ×ÛÉÛ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÚÍÈÔÖÊÍÏÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÈÍÈÔ××ÛÉÈÛÎØÖÊÍÏÈÔ× ï×ÛØÍÅÉÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÉÈÍÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÆÓ×ÅÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÍÚÉÙÇÊ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÌÛÈÊÍÎÉÚÃÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊ××É ÛÎØÈÔ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×ÆÓ×ÅÉÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÚÊÓØÕ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕ ÏÛÃÚ×ÛÚÐ×ÈÍÚ×É××ÎÖÊÍÏÉÍÏ×ÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ï×ÛØÍÅÉÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÚÇÈ Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÓÐÐÚ×É×ÈÛÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×ØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÖÊÍÏÛÎÃÔÍÏ××ÛÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÈÅÍ Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÏÍÉÈÊÍÅÉÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÍÊÖÛÊÈÔ×ÊÛÎØÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÏÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÅÓÐÐ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØ×ÕÊÛØ×ÈÔ×ÆÓÉÇÛÐÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÍÊÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÉ æÓ×ÅÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÅÈÊÛÓÐ ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ØÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÛÎ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ö×ÎÙ×ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÈÊÛÓÐÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÓÉÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÊÍÇÈ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃ ÐÛÙÑÓÎÕÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎæ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛØØ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÔÓÙÔÅÓÐÐÔ×ÐÌÉÍÖÈ×ÎÛÎØÉÙÊ××ÎÈÔ×ÆÓ×ÅÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÕÍÐÖ×ÊÉÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉèÔ×Ö×ÎÙÓÎÕ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×É×ÈÈÓÎÕÐÍÅÕÐÛÊ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐ×ÕÛÎØÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÉ ÇÎÍÚÈÊÇÉÓÆ×ÛÉÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×èÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÕÍÐÖ èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÈÍÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÉ×Æ×ÎÈÔÕÊ××ÎÛÎØÈÔ××ÓÕÔÈÔÔÍÐ×ôÍÅ×Æ×Ê Ö×ÎÙÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÖÊÍÏ×ÎÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÎ×ÅÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø èÊÛÓÐÉÛÐÍÎÕÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÓÎÎÇÏ×ÊÍÇÉÍÈÔ×ÊÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÓÎÛ ÏÛÎÎ×ÊÈÔÛÈÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÐÃÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ÉÕÍÐÖÌÐÛÃÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐØ×ÉÓÕÎÅÓÐÐ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÎØÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ú×ÉÈÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÎÍÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÇÏÏÛÊÃ ÍÎèÊÛÓÐÉÛÎØõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÉûÐÈÛìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕø×ÉÓÕÎ ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄøÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÛÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÎÈÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ× ÖÓÎÛÐÈÊÛÓÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎØ×ÈÛÓÐÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÃ×ÈØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÛÊ× ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎöÓÎÛÐØ×ÉÓÕÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÉÈÊÓÆ×ÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÛÐÐ ÈÊ××ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÎÈ×ÎØÉÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÈÅÍÊÍÅÉÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÛÉÛ ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÎØÛÐÉÍÛÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÂÍÎ×ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÈÍÌ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 29 ÍÖÚÛÎÑÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÛÊ×Û÷ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔ×ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎ ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÅÓØÈÔÙÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ× óÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÛÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖ Citrus sinensis ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØóÈÓÉÛÐÉÍ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕÍÎ×ØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÍÛÑÈÊ×× Quercus agrifolia ÍÎ×ïÍÎÈ×Ê×ÃÙÃÌÊ×ÉÉÍÎ×ïÍÎÈ×Ê×ÃÌÓÎ×ÈÅÍùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÇÙÑ×Ã×É Aesculus californicaJuglans spp. Ú×ÈÅ××ÎØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÈÔÊ××ÅÛÐÎÇÈÈÊ××ÉÚ×ÈÅ××Î Salix spp. ØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÎØÍÎ×ÅÓÐÐÍÅÓÎØÓÛÏ×È×ÊíÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÉÓÉÕÊÍÅÓÎÕ Arundo ÍÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈÛÎØÍÖÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÕÓÛÎÈÊ××ØØÍÎÛÄÅÔÓÙÔ Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÅÛÐÎÇÈÈÊ××ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÏÛÃ Ú×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ØðÛÉÈÐÃÏÓÄ×ØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÙÊ××Ñ ÚÛÎÑÈÍÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÛÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÎÈÓÈÃÍÖÎ×ÅÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎèÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔùÓÈÃ ÙÍØ×ÛÎØÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ èÊÛÓÐùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÈÍ Ö××ÈÅÓØ××ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕ Ö××È éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÎ×ÛÊìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×ÉÍÇÈÔÅÛÊØÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÊÎ×ÎØÍÖÈÔ× ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÎÛÐÐÅ×ÛÈÔ×ÊÖÇÐÐÃ ÈÔÛÈÏ××ÈÉûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÉåÓÈÔøÓÉÛÚÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉûÙÈûøûÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØÓÉÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉÓØ× ÛÎØÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÉ×ÈÈÓÎÕóÈÓÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÚ×ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÓÎ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÌÛÊÑÉûÉÌÔÛÐÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÇÉ×ØèÔ×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÏÛÃÚ× ÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ØÙÊÇÉÔ×ØÍÊØ×ÙÍÏÌÍÉ×ØÕÊÛÎÓÈ×ÍÊÌÍÊÍÇÉÙÍÐÍÊ×ØÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍìÔÛÉ×ÍÊ ÉÍÏ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐóÈÏÛÃÛÐÉÍÚ×ÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÍÎ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐöÍÊ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÈÔ× ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÇÉ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÎÕÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÏÛÃÚ×Û ØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÇÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØ èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÚÇÓÐÈÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÎØÈÔ×ÈÔÔÍÐ×ÍÖúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÛÉÏÛÐÐÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ× ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÈÍÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÉÓÈÙÊÍÉÉ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ùÊ××ÑÛÎØ ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÉÍÎÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØûÖ×ÎÙ×ÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÖÊÍÏ×ÊÊÛÎÈÕÍÐÖÚÛÐÐÉ ÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛóÈÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÊ×ÙÇÊÆ×ØÖ×ÎÙ×ÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÓÎìÔÍÈÍ ÍÊÉÍÏ×ÈÔÓÎÕÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÓÎÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÛÎ×ÅÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×ÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ×Û ÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÛÏ×ØÓÛÎÓÉÐÛÎØÅÓÈÔÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÊ×ÖÇÕ×ÓÎÈÔ×Ù×ÎÈ×ÊÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÖ ÉÌÛÙ×ÛÐÐÍÅÉÛÎØÏÍÈÍÊÓÉÈÅÛÊÎÓÎÕÐÓÕÔÈÉÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÍÎÚÍÈÔØÍÅÎÕÊÛØ×É ÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔÈÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕ íÈÔ×ÊÈÔÛÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÓÈÉ×ÐÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛ×ÉÈÔ×ÈÓÙÉÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÏÛÓÎÐÛÊÕ×ÐÃ ÇÎÙÔÛÎÕ×ØèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÔÛÉÚ××ÎÉÓÈ×ØÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÎØÏÛÒÍÊÕÊÛØÓÎÕèÔ× ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÛ×ÉÈÔ×ÈÓÙÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÍÖÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÛÎØÎ×ÅÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÛÐÍÎÕÚÍÈÔÚÛÎÑÉèÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÈÉ×ÐÖÅÍÇÐØÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÎÕÛ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÂÍÎ×ÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÓØÈÔÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉèÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÂÍÎ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÔ×Ê×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÔÛÆ× Ú××ÎÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×Ø Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Environmental ØùÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÎ×ÅÍÖÍÊÕÐÛÊ× ØÛÃÍÊÓÎÈÔ× ð×ÉÉèÔÛÎèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÐÓÈÛÈÎÓÕÔÈóÖÖÐÛÉÔÓÎÕÐÓÕÔÈÉ ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÈÔ×ÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÓÈ×ØÉÍÛÉÈÍ ØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÈÍÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈ City of Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 31 Less Less 3.2AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES -- óÎØ×È×ÊÏÓÎÓÎÕÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÏÛÃÊ×Ö×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐðÛÎØ ÷ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØéÓÈ×ûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈïÍØ×ÐÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÈÍÖùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÛÎ ÍÌÈÓÍÎÛÐÏÍØ×ÐÈÍÇÉ×ÓÎÛÉÉ×ÉÉÓÎÕÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÎÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊ×ÛÎØÖÛÊÏÐÛÎØóÎØ×È×ÊÏÓÎÓÎÕÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ ÖÍÊ×ÉÈÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÓÏÚ×ÊÐÛÎØÛÊ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÏÛÃÊ×Ö×ÊÈÍ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÏÌÓÐ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÍÊ×ÉÈÊÃÛÎØöÓÊ×ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÈ ÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×öÍÊ×ÉÈÛÎØêÛÎÕ×ûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÈÔ×öÍÊ×ÉÈð×ÕÛÙÃ ûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÖÍÊ×ÉÈÙÛÊÚÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×Ï×ÎÈÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎöÍÊ×ÉÈìÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÉÛØÍÌÈ×ØÚÃ ÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛûÓÊê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉúÍÛÊØåÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛùÍÎÆ×ÊÈìÊÓÏ×öÛÊÏÐÛÎØçÎÓËÇ× öÛÊÏÐÛÎØÍÊöÛÊÏÐÛÎØÍÖéÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× óÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÙ×öÛÊÏÐÛÎØÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÍÎ ÈÔ×ÏÛÌÉÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÈÔ× öÛÊÏÐÛÎØïÛÌÌÓÎÕÛÎØïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ìÊÍÕÊÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ûÕ×ÎÙÃÈÍÎÍÎÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÇÉ×ý ÚùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÂÍÎÓÎÕÖÍÊ ÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÇÉ×ÍÊÛåÓÐÐÓÛÏÉÍÎûÙÈ ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈý ÙùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÂÍÎÓÎÕÖÍÊÍÊ ÙÛÇÉ×Ê×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÛÉ Ø×ÖÓÎ×ØÓÎìÇÚÐÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍØ× É×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÓÏÚ×ÊÐÛÎØÛÉ Ø×ÖÓÎ×ØÚÃìÇÚÐÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍØ× É×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÊÈÓÏÚ×ÊÐÛÎØÂÍÎ×Ø èÓÏÚ×ÊÐÛÎØÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÚÃ õÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈùÍØ×É×ÙÈÓÍÎ Õý Øê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÍÊ ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÈÍÎÍÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ÇÉ×ý ×óÎÆÍÐÆ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÅÔÓÙÔØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÓÊ ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÎÛÈÇÊ×ÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎÍÖöÛÊÏÐÛÎØÈÍÎÍÎ ÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÇÉ×ÍÊÙÍÎÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ÐÛÎØÈÍÎÍÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÇÉ×ý Environmental Setting èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÉ×ÈÓÎÈÔ×ÉÇÚÇÊÚÛÎÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ Ú×ÈÅ××ÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÈÍÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔèÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ××ÛÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÈÔ×ï×ÛØÍÅÉÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 32 Environmental Checklist èÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÅÛÉÖÓÊÉÈÉ×ÈÈÐ×ØÓÎÈÔ× ÉÛÉÊÇÊÛÐÖÛÊÏÐÛÎØÅÔÓÙÔÍÆ×ÊÈÓÏ×ÔÛÉ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕÐÃÕÓÆ×ÎÅÛÃÈÍÉÇÚÇÊÚÛÎÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈèÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÖÛÊÏÉÈÔÛÈ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÉÈÔ×ÍÎÐÃÊ×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕ ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÖÍÍÈÔÓÐÐÉÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÎØéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÓÎ ïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÅÛÉÛÌÛÃÈÍÎÇÈÖÛÊÏåÔÓÐ×ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÛÎØÅÛÐÎÇÈ ÈÊ××ÉÉÈÓÐÐ×ÄÓÉÈÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÈÔ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÚ×ÓÎÕÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÐÃÖÛÊÏ×Øê×ÏÎÛÎÈÉÍÖÛÎ ÍÐØÅÛÐÎÇÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØÉÈÓÐÐ×ÄÓÉÈÉÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÍÎÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÍÅÎ×ØÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÎÍÊÈÔÍÖïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎ êÛÎÙÔÚÇÈÎÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×É×ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÍÊÔÛÊÆ×ÉÈ×Ø îÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉÍÊ ÍÖéÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×ÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×öÛÊÏÐÛÎØïÛÌÌÓÎÕÛÎØïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ìÊÍÕÊÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÍÖðÛÎØê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÈÍÈÛÐÍÖÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÊÍÇÕÔÐÃ ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÛÎØ ÏÓÄ×ØÍÊÙÔÛÊØ ÈÊ××ÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃ×ÄÓÉÈÍÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ Discussion: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? No Impact. èÔ×Ê×ÓÉÎÍìÊÓÏ×öÛÊÏÐÛÎØçÎÓËÇ×öÛÊÏÐÛÎØÍÊöÛÊÏÐÛÎØÍÖéÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× óÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÙ×ÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈûÊ×ÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎðÛÎØçÉ×ïÛÌÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÐÍÅÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØÂÍÎ×ØÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÍÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ÂÍÎÓÎÕÏÛÌùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ îÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÛÊÙ×ÐÉÛÊ×ÇÎØ×ÊåÓÐÐÓÛÏÉÍÎûÙÈÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÉåÔÓÐ× ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÍÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÂÍÎÓÎÕÖÍÊÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÇÉ×ÍÊÛåÓÐÐÓÛÏÉÍÎûÙÈÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈèÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ÏÛÃÎ××ØÈÍÚ×Ê×ÂÍÎ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÖÇÈÇÊ×Ø×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÇÐÈÓÏÛÈ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖ ÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔÓÉÊ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÛÖÇÈÇÊ×ù÷ëûÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ ûÙËÇÓÉÓÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÛÉÏÍÈÓÆÛÈ×ØÚÃùÓÈÃÌÍÐÓÙÃÈÍÛÙËÇÓÊ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÈÍÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÉÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÛÎØÈÍØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÛÃ×ÛÊ ÊÍÇÎØÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×ÍÐØÍÊÙÔÛÊØÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÎÍÈ ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÐÃÖÛÊÏ×ØÍÊÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÚÇÈÈÔ×ÈÊ××ÉÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÈÍÚ×ÛÊÖÊÇÓÈé×ÊÆÓÙ×ÕÊÍÇÌÉ ÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÔÛÊÆ×ÉÈÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÖÍÊÖÍÍØÚÛÎÑÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉ ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÎÈ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÛÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÈÊ××ÉÛÉÎÍÈ×ØÓÎûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄøóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎ ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÅÛÐÎÇÈÈÊ××ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÏÛÃÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×Ø èÔ×ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÌÛÊÈÓÉÓÎÕÍÍØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØÓÉÉÈÓÐÐÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÆ× ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÉÎÍÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÎØÙÍÇÐØÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÖÊÍÏÊ×ÕÇÐÛÊÙÛÊ×éÍÏ× ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÌÛÉÈÈÔ×ÓÊÌÊÓÏ×ÍÊÛÊ×ØÃÓÎÕûÉÏÇÙÔÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊÙÔÛÊØÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÉ ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÐÍÉÉÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××É City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 33 ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÙÓÈÊÇÉÍÊÙÔÛÊØÉÅ×Ê×ÎÍÈÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈÃÌ×ÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÎéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃÛÉ ÉÈÍÎ×ÖÊÇÓÈÉÅ×Ê×ÈÔ×ÏÍÊ×ÌÊ×ØÍÏÓÎÛÎÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÃÌ××ÕÌÐÇÏÉÛÌÊÓÙÍÈÉÙÔ×ÊÊÓ×ÉèÔ× ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÅÛÉÛÎÍÎÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÍÊÙÔÛÊØÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÚÃïÊéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊèÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖ ÉÍÏ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÓÉÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÇÎØ×Êù÷ëû c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4536), or timberland zoned Timberland production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÂÍÎÓÎÕÖÍÊÍÊÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ× Ê×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÎÍÈÂÍÎ×ØÖÍÊÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÈÓÏÚ×ÊÐÛÎØÍÊÈÓÏÚ×ÊÐÛÎØ ÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎ d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. îÍÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØ×ÄÓÉÈÉÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÍÊÈÔ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎÍÖÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØÈÍÎÍÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÇÉ× e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛØÍÎÍÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÛÎÃÖÛÊÏÐÛÎØÍÊ ÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÇÉ×ÉîÍÛÉÌ×ÙÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÙÍÎÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎÍÖÖÛÊÏÐÛÎØÍÊÖÍÊ×ÉÈÐÛÎØ ÈÍÎÍÎÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÍÊÎÍÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÇÉ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 34 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.3AIR QUALITY -- åÔ×Ê×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÍÊÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÏÛÃÚ×Ê×ÐÓ×ØÇÌÍÎÈÍÏÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕØ×È×ÊÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÉ åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÍÊÍÚÉÈÊÇÙÈ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÛÓÊ ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÌÐÛÎý ÚæÓÍÐÛÈ×ÛÎÃÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÍÊ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÈÍÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÆÓÍÐÛÈÓÍÎý Ùê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ×Î×ÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÍÖÛÎÃ ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÖÍÊÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ê×ÕÓÍÎÓÉÎÍÎÛÈÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈÇÎØ×ÊÛÎ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÍÊÉÈÛÈ×ÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÛÓÊ ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÊ×Ð×ÛÉÓÎÕ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÔÓÙÔ×ÄÙ××ØËÇÛÎÈÓÈÛÈÓÆ× ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÖÍÊÍÂÍÎ×ÌÊ×ÙÇÊÉÍÊÉý Ø÷ÄÌÍÉ×É×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×Ê×Ù×ÌÈÍÊÉÈÍ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉý ×ùÊ×ÛÈ×ÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÚÐ×ÍØÍÊÉÛÖÖ×ÙÈÓÎÕ ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌ×ÍÌÐ×ý Environmental and Regulatory Setting ûÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÉÛÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÎØÈÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÛÎØÏ×È×ÍÊÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ ÓÎÖÐÇ×ÎÙ×ÉèÔ×ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÛÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÛÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈÈÍÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÈÔ×ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÛÎØØÓÉÌ×ÊÉÓÍÎÍÖÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉÛÎØØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÈÉÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃûÊ×ÛûÓÊúÛÉÓÎéöúûûúÛÎ ÛÊ×ÛÍÖÎÍÎÛÈÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈÖÍÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÉÈÛÈ×ÍÂÍÎ×ÉÈÛÈ×ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÈ×ÏÛÈÈ×Êìï ÛÎØ ÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÉÈÛÈ×ÖÓÎ×ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÈ×ÏÛÈÈ×Êìï ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉçé÷ìû ÛÎØ úûûëïø èÔ×úÛÃûÊ×ÛûÓÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈúûûëïøÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÓÎÕ ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÎØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÎÕ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÎØÈÍÄÓÙÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éöúûûúèÔ× úûûëïøÙÛÊÊÓ×ÉÍÇÈÈÔÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÚÃÌÊ×ÌÛÊÓÎÕÛØÍÌÈÓÎÕÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÌÐÛÎÉ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÊÇÐ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÛÙÔÓ×Æ×ÛÈÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈÍÖÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉèÔ×úûûëïøÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÔÛÉ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ ÊÇÐ×ÉÈÔÛÈ ÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÛÎØÐÓÏÓÈ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÖÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉ Bay Area 2010 Clean Air Plan (CAP) íÎé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê ÈÔ×úûûëïøÛØÍÌÈ×ØÈÔ× 2005 Ozone Strategy èÔÓÉÌÐÛÎÇÌØÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ÉÍÂÍÎ×ìïÈÍÄÓÙÛÓÊ ÙÍÎÈÛÏÓÎÛÎÈÉÛÎØÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×ÕÛÉ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÓÎÛÉÓÎÕÐ×ÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈ×ØØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉ ÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÉÈÊÛÈ×ÕÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×úûûëïøÛÎØÓÈÉ ÌÛÊÈÎ×ÊÉÅÓÐÐÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÌÇÚÐÓÙÔ×ÛÐÈÔÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÍÇÊÙÐÓÏÛÈ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 35 èÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÖÍÙÇÉÍÎÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÊÃÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÏÍÚÓÐ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØ×Î×ÊÕÃÛÎØÙÐÓÏÛÈ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×Éúûûëïø Û óÎïÛÃ ÈÔ×úûûëïøÇÌØÛÈ×ØÓÈÉù÷ëûÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÖÍÊ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÉÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÛÎØÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É úûûëïø èÔ×úûûëïøÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈ×ÄÙ××ØÈÔ×ù÷ëû CEQA Air Quality Guidelines ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÈÍÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ×ÖÖ×ÙÈèÔ× ÛÐÉÍÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÛÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÆ×ÓÎØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÛÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÓÖÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏ××ÈÉÛÐÐÍÖÈÔ×ÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔ×ÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÎØÛØ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÓÉÎÍÈ CEQA Air Quality Guidelines Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÖÍÊÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÍÊÛÙÓÈÃÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÉÛÎØ ÛÙÊ×ÉÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃöÍÊÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÔ×ÉÓÂ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÉÏÛÐÐ×ÊÈÔÛÎÈÔ× ÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÛØ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÓÉÎÍÈÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃ Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉØÇ×ÈÍÓÈÉ ÉÓÂ×óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÂ×ÛÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚ×ÉÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×Ð×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ Existing Emissions Sources èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÉÍÖÛÉÈÊÓÌÍÖÐÛÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÈÔ×úÐÇ× ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈ õÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÎÈÔ× ìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×ÛÎØÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÛÊÙ×ÐÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÛÔÍÏ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×ØÕÛÊÛÕ×Î×ÛÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÙÊ×ÍÊÛÎÕ× ÏÓÄ×ØÖÊÇÓÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÛÓÎØ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÔÍÏ×ÛÎØ ÕÛÊÛÕ×ÛÊ×ÎÍÈÍÙÙÇÌÓ×ØÛÎØØÍÎÍÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÍÊÖÇ×ÐÙÍÏÚÇÉÈÓÍÎÖÍÊ Ô×ÛÈÓÎÕÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉèÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÉÎÍÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÓÉÎÍÈÛÉÉÇÏ×ØÈÍÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÛÎÃÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×Ø×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Õ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÎÕÇÎÓÈÉÍÎÉÓÈ×èÔ×ÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÊÃÉÍÇÊÙ×ÍÖ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÅ×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈúûûëïø Proposed Emission Sources ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÆ×ÛÙÊ×ÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÉÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ö××ÈÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÊÛÓÐ ÛÏ×ÎÓÈÓ×ÉÚÊÓØÕ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÎÕ Ö××ÈÛÎØÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÛÐÍÎÕ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÅÓÈÔÖÓÉÔÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎ ÙÇÚÓÙÃÛÊØÉÙÇÃØÉÍÖ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÔÍÇÉ×ÛÎØÕÛÊÛÕ×ÍÎÉÓÈ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÍÆ×ÊÛÖÓÆ×ÈÍ ÉÓÄÏÍÎÈÔÌ×ÊÓÍØÓÎ èÛÚÐ× Ú×ÐÍÅÐÓÉÈÉÈÔ×ÈÃÌ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÛÎØ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÇÉ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈ Table 3.3-1. Project Construction Equipment ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈèÃÌ×îÍÍÎéÓÈ×îÍÍÖøÛÃÉóÎçÉ× ùÊÛÎ× øÍÂ×Ê ÷ÄÙÛÆÛÈÍÊ éÙÊ××Î×Ê é×ÌÛÊÛÈÍÊ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 36 Environmental Checklist Table 3.3-1. Project Construction Equipment ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈèÃÌ×îÍÍÎéÓÈ×îÍÍÖøÛÃÉóÎçÉ× åÛÈ×ÊÈÊÇÙÑ Source: City of Cupertino 2011. óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÍÖÖÊÍÛØ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍ ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎØ×ÄÌÍÊÈÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÎØ ÙÇÃØÉÍÖÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃÍÆ×ÊÛÈÔÊ×× ÏÍÎÈÔÌ×ÊÓÍØèÔ×ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÍÖ ÙÇÃØÉÍÖÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÇÙÑÈÊÓÌÉÍÊÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÇÙÑÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊØÛÃØÇÊÓÎÕÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÊ××ÏÍÎÈÔÌ×ÊÓÍØ ÅÔ×ÎÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÍÙÙÇÊÉùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÓ×ÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÈÔÛÈØÊÓÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÛÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÇÌÈÍ ÈÍÈÛÐÅ××ÑØÛÃÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÛÎØ ÈÍÈÛÐÅ××Ñ×ÎØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ É××é×ÙÈÓÍÎ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ èÊÛÖÖÓÙÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊÃ×ÛÊ Sensitive Receptors ûÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×Ê×Ù×ÌÈÍÊÓÉÕ×Î×ÊÓÙÛÐÐÃØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÛÉÛÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÔ×Ê×ÔÇÏÛÎÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÐÃÙÔÓÐØÊ×ÎÉ×ÎÓÍÊÉÛÎØÉÓÙÑÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÛÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ÍÖÙÍÎÈÓÎÇÍÇÉÔÇÏÛÎ×ÄÌÍÉÇÊ×ÈÍÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉèÔ×É×ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÉÔÍÉÌÓÈÛÐÉ ÛÎØÉÙÔÍÍÐÉ èÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÓÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØ×ØÚÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÉèÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÔÍÉÌÓÈÛÐÉÍÊÉÙÔÍÍÐÉÅÓÈÔÓÎ Ö××ÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃ Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÍÊÍÚÉÈÊÇÙÈ 2010 Clean Air Plan ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×úèÔ× ùûìÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÈ× ÏÛÈÈ×ÊÛÎØÍÂÍÎ×ÌÊ×ÙÇÊÉÍÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÊ×ÛÙÈÓÆ×ÍÊÕÛÎÓÙÕÛÉ×ÉêíõÛÎØÍÄÓØ×ÉÍÖ ÎÓÈÊÍÕ×ÎîíÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÏÍÚÓÐ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈÈÔ× ä úûûëïøÓÎÓÈÉ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÓ×ÉÛÎØÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÛÙÔÓ×ÆÓÎÕÛÈÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÉÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×É××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÆÓÍÐÛÈ× ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÎÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÈÍÛÎÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÆÓÍÐÛÈÓÍÎ Short-Term Construction Emissions èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉÓÂ×ÍÖÛÙÊ×ÉÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÉÓÈ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÓ×ÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎ ÙÇÚÓÙÃÛÊØÉÍÖ ÉÍÓÐÓÏÌÍÊÈ ×ÄÌÍÊÈÍÊÈÔ×ÉÓÏÇÐÈÛÎ×ÍÇÉÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÈÅÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌÔÛÉ×É CEQA Air Quality Guidelines ùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÏ××È ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÎØØÍÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Û ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 37 ì×ÊúûûëïøÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÈÍÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê Ê×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×ÏÛÕÎÓÈÇØ×ÍÖÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Construction Best Management Practices åÛÈ×Ê×ÄÌÍÉ×ØÉÇÊÖÛÙ×É×ÕÇÎÌÛÆ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÉÈÛÕÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÉÍÓÐÌÓÐ×ÉÕÊÛØ×Ø ÛÊ×ÛÉÛÎØÇÎÌÛÆ×ØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÊÍÛØÉØÛÓÐÃÍÊÛÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊØÇÉÈÙÍÎÈÊÍÐ ùÍÆ×ÊÔÛÇÐÈÊÇÙÑÉÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÉÍÓÐÉÛÎØÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÐÍÍÉ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÍÖÖÉÓÈ× çÉ×ÆÛÙÇÇÏÉÈÊ××ÈÉÅ××Ì×ÊÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×Ï×ÈÔÍØØÛÓÐÃÍÊÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆ× ÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÏÇØÍÊØÓÊÈÈÊÛÙÑÍÇÈÍÎÈÍÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÍÛØÉ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÌ××ØÉÍÎÇÎÌÛÆ×ØÊÍÛØÉÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈ×ÄÙ××ØÏÌÔ êÍÛØÅÛÃÉØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÉÛÎØÉÓØ×ÅÛÐÑÉÈÍÚ×ÌÛÆ×ØÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÛÉÉÍÍÎÛÉ Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐ× ïÓÎÓÏÓÂ××ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÓØÐÓÎÕÈÓÏ×ÉÈÍÏÓÎÇÈ×É ìÊÍÌ×ÊÐÃÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÎØÈÇÎ×ÛÐÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔ ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ ìÍÉÈÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÐÃÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÉÓÕÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ×È×Ð×ÌÔÍÎ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÛÎØÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÍÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕ ØÇÉÈÌÊÍÚÐ×ÏÉ Long-Term Operational Emissions èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÇÌÈÍ ÈÍÈÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×Ê Å××ÑØÛÃÛÎØ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊÅ××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃèÔ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÖÓÆ×ÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØÓÉ Ú×ÐÍÅÈÔ×úûûëïøÈÃÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉÓÂ×ÍÖ CEQA Air Quality Guidelines ÛÙÊ×ÉùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ× Ú×ÐÍÅÈÔÓÉÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈ×ÄÙ××Øúûûëïø ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÍÛÓÊ ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÖÊÍÏÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant Impact. ûÉØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÓÎÛÛÎØÚÛÚÍÆ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈ×ÄÙ××ØúûûëïøÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×óÎ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÓÎÕÓÈÉù÷ëûÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÈÔ×úûûëïøÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÈÔ××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÐ×Æ×ÐÉÛÈ ÅÔÓÙÔÛÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ×èÔ×úûûëïø ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈ×ÄÙ××ØÓÈÉù÷ëûÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÈÍ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ×ÛÎØÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÐÃ×ÄÙ××ØÛÎÃúûûëïøù÷ëûÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÉÍÖ×ÄÌÛÎØ×ØÙÓÈÃÌÛÊÑ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÛÎÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÛÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ× ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃûÓÊêÓÉÑ÷ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎùûê÷ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×úûûëïøÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÓÎ ÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÔÓÕÔÐ×Æ×ÐÉÍÖÊÓÉÑÖÊÍÏÈÍÄÓÙÛÓÊÙÍÎÈÛÏÓÎÛÎÈÉèûùÉúûûëïø èÔ×ÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÊÃÉÍÇÊÙ×ÍÖ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÈÍÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÛÈ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØöÛÙÓÐÓÈÃóø úûûëïø ÙèÔ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 38 Environmental Checklist ÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÈÛÈ×êÍÇÈ×éêÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Recommended Methods for Ö××È×ÛÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ× Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards ÈÔ×ìï ÙÛÊÙÓÎÍÕ×ÎÓÙÛÎØÎÍÎ ÙÛÊÙÓÎÍÕ×ÎÓÙÊÓÉÑÉÛÎØÔÛÂÛÊØÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×É×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÉÓÎÙ× ÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ Ö××ÈÛÅÛÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈúûûëïø èÔ×ÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÉÈÊ××ÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÔÓÙÔÔÛÉÛÎ ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×ØÛÓÐÃÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÆÍÐÇÏ×ÍÖ ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊØÛÃ×ÛÉÈÍÖöÍÍÈÔÓÐÐúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÍÇÎÈØÛÈÛòÇÎ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÉÛÎ×ÛÉÈÅ×ÉÈØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÛÈÓÈÉÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈÌÍÓÎÈûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ× County Surface Street Screening Tables éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÌÊÍØÇÙ× ÛÎÎÇÛÐÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×ìï ÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÏÓÙÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÌ×ÊÙÇÚÓÙÏ×È×ÊÏÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎÓÎÙÊ×Ï×ÎÈÛÐÐÓÖ×ÈÓÏ××ÄÙ×ÉÉÙÛÎÙ×ÊÊÓÉÑÉÍÖ Ì×ÊÏÓÐÐÓÍÎÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎúûûëïø èÔ×É×ÆÛÐÇ×ÉÛÊ×Ú×ÐÍÅúûûëïøÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÖÍÊìï ÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ Õ ÏÛÎØÓÎÙÊ×Ï×ÎÈÛÐÙÛÎÙ×ÊÊÓÉÑÉ Ì×ÊÏÓÐÐÓÍÎÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÐ×ÉÉ ÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÇÌÈÍ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊØÛÃÛÎØ ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÆÍÐÇÏ×ÉÛÚÍÆ×úûûëïøÙÛÊÚÍÎÏÍÎÍÄÓØ×ÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉÍÖ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÌ×ÊÔÍÇÊÍÊ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÌ×ÊÔÍÇÊÅÔ×Ê×ÔÍÊÓÂÍÎÈÛÐÍÊÆ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐÏÓÄÓÎÕÓÉÐÓÏÓÈ×ØØÇ× ÈÍÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÇÎÎ×ÐÉÕÛÊÛÕ×ÉÇÎØ×ÊÌÛÉÉ×ÉÙÛÎÃÍÎÉÍÊÚ×ÐÍÅÕÊÛØ×ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÉ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÈÍÈÛÐ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÌÈÍ Ì×ÊØÛÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØ×ÏÓÈìï ÖÊÍÏ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈ×ÄÔÛÇÉÈî×ÛÊÐÃÛÐÐÍÖÈÔ×ìï ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈ×ÄÔÛÇÉÈ ØÓ×É×ÐÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÈ×ÏÛÈÈ×ÊÛèûùèÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÉÈÊ×ÛÏÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÓÎÈ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ÎÈÐÃØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ØÛÃÈÓÏ×Å××ÑØÛÃÌ×ÊÓÍØÖÍÊÇÌÈÍÖÓÆ×ÈÍÉÓÄ ÏÍÎÈÔÉûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØ×ÏÓÈÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÎØÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉÈÔ×É× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Å×ÐÐÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ× ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÉÔÍÊÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÓÍØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÈÔ×ØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÉÛÎØ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÔÍÏ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×Ð×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÏÛÕÎÓÈÇØ×ÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of Less Than Significant Impact. éÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏÍØÍÊÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ØÓÉÉÓÌÛÈ×ØÚÃÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÊ××ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÉÛÎØÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕ É×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×Ê×Ù×ÌÈÍÊÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÚÐ× ÍØÍÊÉÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÛÖÖ×ÙÈÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌ×ÍÌÐ× City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 39 Less Less 3.4BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛôÛÆ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈ ×ÓÈÔ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÍÊÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÎÛÎÃÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×Ø ÛÉÛÙÛÎØÓØÛÈ×É×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÍÊÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐ ÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÐÍÙÛÐÍÊÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÐÛÎÉÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÍÊÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÊÚÃÈÔ× ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØ õÛÏ×ÍÊçéöÓÉÔÛÎØ ÚôÛÆ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎ ÛÎÃÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ× ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÐÍÙÛÐÍÊ Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÌÐÛÎÉÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÊ ÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔ ÛÎØõÛÏ×ÍÊçéöÓÉÔÛÎØåÓÐØÐÓÖ× é×ÊÆÓÙ×ý ÙôÛÆ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎ Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÛÉØ×ÖÓÎ×Ø ÚÃé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ×ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÏÛÊÉÔ Æ×ÊÎÛÐÌÍÍÐÙÍÛÉÈÛÐ×ÈÙÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ØÓÊ×ÙÈÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÖÓÐÐÓÎÕÔÃØÊÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ ÓÎÈ×ÊÊÇÌÈÓÍÎÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÏ×ÛÎÉý ØóÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÛÎÃÎÛÈÓÆ×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÍÊ ÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÖÓÉÔÍÊÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÅÓÈÔ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÎÛÈÓÆ×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÍÊÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃ ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÍÊÓÏÌ×Ø×ÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÎÇÊÉ×ÊÃÉÓÈ×Éý ×ùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÃÐÍÙÛÐÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÍÊ ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÎÕÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÈÊ××ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÍÐÓÙÃÍÊÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ý ÖùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÛÎ ÛØÍÌÈ×ØôÛÚÓÈÛÈùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎ îÛÈÇÊÛÐùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎ ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÍÊ ÉÈÛÈ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎý Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 40 Environmental Checklist Regulatory Setting Federal Regulations ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈ èÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈ÷éûÍÖ çéù ×ÈÉ×ËÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉ ÖÓÉÔÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉ Ê×Ö×ÊÉÈÍÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÉÇÚÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÓÎØÛÎÕ×ÊÍÖ ×ÄÈÓÎÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÛÐÐÍÊÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÓÊÊÛÎÕ×Ê×Ö×ÊÉÈÍÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÉÇÚÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÍÊØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÚ×ÙÍÏ××ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÖÇÈÇÊ× ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ÷éûé×ÙÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÓÉÈ×Ø×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÛÎØÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÖÊÍÏÇÎÐÛÅÖÇÐÈÛÑ×çéù ÛÓÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÈÍÏ×ÛÎÔÛÊÏ ÌÇÊÉÇ×ÔÇÎÈÉÔÍÍÈÅÍÇÎØÑÓÐÐÈÊÛÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÍÊÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÍÊÈÍÛÈÈ×ÏÌÈÈÍ×ÎÕÛÕ×ÓÎÛÎÃÉÇÙÔ çéù ÓÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÛÉÛÎÛÙÈÈÔÛÈÐÃÑÓÐÐÉÍÊÓÎÒÇÊ×É ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×éÇÙÔÛÙÈÏÛÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÊØ×ÕÊÛØÛÈÓÍÎÅÔ×Ê×ÓÈÛÙÈÇÛÐÐÃ ÑÓÐÐÉÍÊÓÎÒÇÊ×ÉÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÚÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐÃÓÏÌÛÓÊÓÎÕ×ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐÚ×ÔÛÆÓÍÊÛÐÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÊ××ØÓÎÕ Ö××ØÓÎÕÍÊ ùöê èÔ×÷éûÛÐÉÍÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÉÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕØÓÕÕÓÎÕÇÌÙÇÈÈÓÎÕÍÊ ÏÛÐÓÙÓÍÇÉÐÃØÛÏÛÕÓÎÕÍÊØ×ÉÈÊÍÃÓÎÕÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÓÉÈ×ØÌÐÛÎÈÉÍÎÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÛÎØ é×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×÷éûÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÓÎÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÎØÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ÛÉÉÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×é×ÙÊ×ÈÛÊÃÍÖÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÓÍÊÍÊÈÔ×é×ÙÊ×ÈÛÊÃÍÖùÍÏÏ×ÊÙ×ÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÈÍ ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÔ×ÃÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂ×ÖÇÎØÍÊÙÛÊÊÃÍÇÈÛÊ×ÎÍÈÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÒ×ÍÌÛÊØÓÂ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø ×ÄÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Ø×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÛØÆ×ÊÉ× ÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉùÊÓÈÓÙÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ Õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÛÊ×ÛÉÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÍÙÙÇÌÓ×ØÚÃÐÓÉÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÎÍÈÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ××ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÐÓÉÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÃØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×Ø ÓÎÈÔ×ö×Ø×ÊÛÐê×ÕÓÉÈ×Êé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ×÷éûÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÎÉÅÔ×Ê×ÚÃÛÎÍÎÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÈÔÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÈÛÑ×ÍÖÛÐÓÉÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÛÎÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÛÐÈÛÑ× Ì×ÊÏÓÈûÎÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÛÐÈÛÑ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÅÔ×ÎÎÍÎÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎÈÔ×ÈÛÑ×ÍÖÛÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É çÎØ×ÊÈÔ×÷éûÈÔ×é×ÙÊ×ÈÛÊÃÍÖÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÓÍÊÛÎØÈÔ×é×ÙÊ×ÈÛÊÃÍÖùÍÏÏ×ÊÙ×ÔÛÆ×ÈÔ× ÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÈÍÐÓÉÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØèÔ×÷éûÓÉ×ÎÖÍÊÙ×ØÚÃÈÔ×çÎÓÈ×ØéÈÛÈ×É öÓÉÔÛÎØåÓÐØÐÓÖ×é×ÊÆÓÙ×çéöåéÛÎØîÛÈÓÍÎÛÐíÙ×ÛÎÓÙÛÎØûÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐïÛÊÓÎ×öÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×Éé×ÊÆÓÙ×îíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉîíûûÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÇÎØ×Ê÷éûÓÉ ÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÛÊÓÎ×ÏÛÏÏÛÐÉÏÛÊÓÎ×ÖÓÉÔ×ÉÛÎØÛÎÛØÊÍÏÍÇÉÖÓÉÔ×ÉÛÐÐÍÈÔ×Ê ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍçéöåéÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎ ïÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃúÓÊØèÊ×ÛÈÃûÙÈ èÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐïÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃúÓÊØèÊ×ÛÈÃûÙÈïúèûçéù ×ÈÉ×Ë×ÎÛÙÈ×ØÈÔ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÊ×ÛÈÓ×ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×çÎÓÈ×ØéÈÛÈ×ÉçÎÓÈ×ØñÓÎÕØÍÏï×ÄÓÙÍòÛÌÛÎÛÎØÈÔ× éÍÆÓ×ÈçÎÓÍÎÛÎØÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂ×ÉÈÔ×é×ÙÊ×ÈÛÊÃÍÖÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÛÎØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ÈÛÑ×ÍÖ ÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÚÓÊØÉèÔ×ïúèûÓÉÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈ×Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×çéöåéóÈ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ÉÉ×ÛÉÍÎÉÛÎØÚÛÕ ÐÓÏÓÈÉÖÍÊÔÇÎÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÑÓÎÕÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉÓÍÎÓÏÌÍÊÈ×ÄÌÍÊÈÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÉÛÐ× ÌÇÊÙÔÛÉ×ÛÎØÚÛÊÈ×ÊÍÖÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÚÓÊØÉÈÔ×ÓÊÍÙÙÇÌÓ×ØÎ×ÉÈÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊ×ÕÕÉÓÐÐ×ÕÛÐ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÅÔ×Î ÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂ×ØÚÃÛÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈèÛÑ×ÓÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÏÍÊ×ÎÛÊÊÍÅÐÃÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ïúèûÈÔÛÎÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ× ÷éûÛÎØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÍÎÐÃÈÔ×Ø×ÛÈÔÍÊÓÎÒÇÊÃÍÖÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÍÖÛÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÚÓÊØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÈÔ×ÓÊ×ÕÕÉ ûÉÉÇÙÔÈÛÑ×ÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ïúèûØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÉÍÖÔÛÊÏÛÎØÔÛÊÛÉÉÏ×ÎÈ ÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×÷éû City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 41 ïÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÚÓÊØÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ïúèûéÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙØ×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖ ÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÚÓÊØÛÊ×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÈÊ×ÛÈÓ×ÉóÎÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÚÓÊØÉÈÔÛÈÏÓÕÊÛÈ×ÈÍ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÉÈÛÕ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÓÊÐÓÖ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÍÊÈÍÈÛÑ×ÛØÆÛÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉØÇÊÓÎÕØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÉ×ÛÉÍÎÉÛÊ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×ïúèû State Regulations ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈ èÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈù÷éûÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈ×Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùøöõÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÉÎÍÊ ÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÛÉ ÙÛÎØÓØÛÈ×ÉÖÍÊÐÓÉÈÓÎÕù÷éûÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÛÐÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÈÛÑÓÎÕÐÓÉÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É×ÄÙ×ÌÈÇÎØ×ÊÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎ ÙÓÊÙÇÏÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉèÔ×ÉÈÛÈ×Ø×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÛÑ×ÓÉÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐØ×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÈÔÛÈù÷éû ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÔÛÊÏÈÍÐÓÉÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÚÃÅÛÃÍÖÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎçÎØ×Êù÷éûÛÎ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÏÇÉÈÔÛÆ×ÛØÓÊ×ÙÈØ×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÚÐ×Ø×ÈÊÓÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ùøöõÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÉÐÓÉÈÉÍÖÛÎÓÏÛÐÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎùééùÈÔÛÈÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÉÅÛÈÙÔ ÐÓÉÈÉûùééùÓÉÎÍÈÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×ÈÛÑ×ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖù÷éûèÔ×ùééùÛÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ× Ø×ÙÐÓÎÓÎÕÛÈÛÊÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ÷éûÍÊù÷éûÛÎØ ÍÊÔÛÆ× ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÓÎÐÍÅÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÛÎØÑÎÍÅÎÈÔÊ×ÛÈÉÈÍÈÔ×ÓÊÌ×ÊÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃ×ÄÓÉÈèÔÓÉ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×É×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÉÛÎØÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍ ÖÍÙÇÉÛÈÈ×ÎÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÔ×ÐÌÛÆ×ÊÈÈÔ×Î××ØÖÍÊÙÍÉÈÐÃÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÇÎØ×ÊÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÛÎØÉÈÛÈ× ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÐÛÅÉèÔÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÍÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÉÈÓÏÇÐÛÈ×ÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÃØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÛÎØÉÈÛÈÇÉÍÖÌÍÍÊÐÃÑÎÍÅÎÛÈÊÓÉÑÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÖÍÙÇÉ Ê×É×ÛÊÙÔÛÎØÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÈ×ÎÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÏùÍÏÊÛÙÑ×ÈÛÐ éÈÛÈ×ÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÉÔÍÇÐØÎÍÈÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÒ×ÍÌÛÊØÓÂ×ÈÔ× ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø×ÄÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÛÎÃ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÍÊÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Ø×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊ ÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø×ÄÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔÍÉ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÖÈÔ×Ê×ÛÊ× Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ×ÛÎØÌÊÇØ×ÎÈÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊ ÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÒ×ÍÌÛÊØÃöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ× çÎØ×Êé×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÊ ÍÖÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ×ùøöõÏÛÃÌ×ÊÏÓÈÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÛÐÈÛÑ×ÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÐÓÉÈ×ØÇÎØ×Êù÷éû×ÄÙ×ÌÈÖÍÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×Ø èÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÉ×ÌÛÊÛÈ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ× ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÖÖÍÊØ×ØÇÎØ×Êù÷éûèÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÉÈÛÈÇÈ×ÉÛÖÖÍÊØÉÍÏ×ÐÓÏÓÈÉÍÎÈÛÑ×ÍÖ ÎÛÏ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×Éé×ÙÈÓÍÎ Î×ÉÈÉÍÊ×ÕÕÉ ÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÎ×ÉÈÉÛÎØ×ÕÕÉ ×ÕÊ×ÈÉÍÉÌÊ×ÃÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÊØÉ ÕÛÏ×ÚÓÊØÉ ÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÚÓÊØÉ ÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÏÛÏÏÛÐÉ ×ÈÉ×ËÏÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÐÓÍÎÉ ÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÊ×ÌÈÓÐ×ÉÛÎØ ÛÏÌÔÓÚÓÛÎÉÛÎØÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÖÓÉÔ é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÉÓÏÌÐÃÉÈÛÈ×ÉÓÉÇÎÐÛÅÖÇÐÈÍÈÛÑ×ÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉÍÊÎ××ØÐ×ÉÉÐÃØ×ÉÈÊÍÃÈÔ× Î×ÉÈÍÊ×ÕÕÉÍÖÛÎÃÚÓÊØ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔÓÉÙÍØ×ÍÊÛÎÃÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÏÛØ× ÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÔ×èÔ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÌÌÐÃÈÍÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÙÛÇÉÓÎÕ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÔÛÊØÉÔÓÌÈÍÛÎÓÎØÇÉÈÊÃé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÈÓÉÇÎÐÛÅÖÇÐÈÍÈÛÑ×ÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉÍÊØ×ÉÈÊÍÃ ÛÎÃÚÓÊØÉÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊØ×ÊöÛÐÙÍÎÓÖÍÊÏ×ÉÍÊéÈÊÓÕÓÖÍÊÏ×ÉÚÓÊØÉÍÖÌÊ×ÃÍÊÈÍÈÛÑ×ÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉÍÊ Ø×ÉÈÊÍÃÈÔ×Î×ÉÈÍÊ×ÕÕÉÍÖÛÎÃÉÇÙÔÚÓÊØ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔÓÉÙÍØ×ÍÊÛÎÃ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÉÈÛÑÓÎÕÉ×ÐÐÓÎÕÍÊÌÇÊÙÔÛÉÓÎÕ×ÕÊ×ÈÉÍÉÌÊ×ÃÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×ÊÎÛÏ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÛÎÃÌÛÊÈÍÖÉÇÙÔÚÓÊØÉ öÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÏÛÃÎÍÈÚ×ÈÛÑ×ÎÍÊÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉ×Ø×ÄÙ×ÌÈÖÍÊÉÙÓ×ÎÈÓÖÓÙÊ×É×ÛÊÙÔ æÛÊÓÍÇÉöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ×É×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 42 Environmental Checklist ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛîÛÈÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÈìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÙÈ èÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛîÛÈÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÈìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÙÈùîììûÍÖÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÉÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉÛÎØ ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×É×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÛÎØÊÛÊ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÃÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐÃÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÈÛÑ×ÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉÓÍÎÍÊÉÛÐ×ÍÖÛÎÃÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ× ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÉÊÛÊ×ÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø×ÄÙ×ÌÈÇÎØ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÙÓÊÙÇÏÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ûÙÈ æÛÊÓÍÇÉÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÊ××Ä×ÏÌÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùîììûÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÛÑ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×É×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÏÛÃ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏùøöõÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ× ûÉÛÈÊÇÉÈ××ÛÕ×ÎÙÃùøöõÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉÍÎÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÖØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ Ê×ÆÓ×Å×ØÇÎØ×Êù÷ëûù÷ëûÕÓÆ×ÉùøöõÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉ Ø××Ï×ØÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÛÎÃÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÉÇÊÆÓÆ×ÓÎÉ×ÐÖÉÇÉÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÚÇÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÛÐÐÍÅ ùøöõÈÍÕÍÆ×ÊÎÐÛÎØÇÉ×óÈÉÈÓÌÇÐÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈ×Ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÃÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÅÓÈÔÛÎØÍÚÈÛÓÎ ÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉÖÊÍÏùøöõÓÎÌÊ×ÌÛÊÓÎÕÛÎ÷óêÍÎÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÉÈÍÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÍÎ ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø×ÄÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÛÎÃ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÍÊÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉìÇÚÐÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍØ× Regulated Waters óÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÚ×ØÛÎØÚÛÎÑÛÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐÃÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùøöõ ùÍØ× ×ÈÉ×ËÛÎØÏÛÃÖÛÐÐÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈ ÛÎØ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÛÎØÈÔ×ìÍÊÈ×ÊùÍÐÍÕÎ×åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐûÙÈèÔ×ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃ ùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØ×ÎÖÍÊÙ×ÉÌ×ÊÏÓÈÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ìÍÊÈ×ÊùÍÐÍÕÎ×åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐûÙÈ ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÎÃÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÖÍÊÛÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÍÓÏÌÛÙÈÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÇÎØ×Êé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ×ùÐ×ÛÎ åÛÈ×ÊûÙÈÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕîÛÈÓÍÎÅÓØ×ì×ÊÏÓÈÉîåìÅÔ×Ê×ÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÎÍÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÏÇÉÈÛÐÉÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÍÈÔ×çéûÊÏÃùÍÊÌÉÍÖ÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÉçéûù÷ÛÙ×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏÈÔ×éÈÛÈ×ÍÖ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛèÔ×ÓÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×éÈÛÈ×åÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØ èÔ×ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØêåëùúÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÚ× ÏÛØ×ÛÈÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÈÓÏ×ÈÔÛÈÛÎÃÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÈÍÍÈÔ×ÊÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉ ÍÊÈÔ×çéöåéûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÎÍÈÖÓÎÛÐÇÎÈÓÐÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÇÎØ×Ê ÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐëÇÛÐÓÈÃûÙÈù÷ëûÙ×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×êåëùúÓÉ ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÎÍÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃçéûù÷É××ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÍÖé×ÙÈÓÍÎ Ú×ÐÍÅóÈÏÇÉÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÃÌ×ÍÖÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÔÛÈÓÉÚ×ÓÎÕÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÛ Ø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÔÍÅÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÍÚ×ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ØÛÎØÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÅÓÈÔÕÍÛÐÉÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ÉÛÎØÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏÇÉÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÊÈÅÓÙ×ÛÉÏÛÎÃÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÛÉÛÊ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØèÔ×êåëùúÐÍÍÑÉÖÍÊ ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÓÉÍÎÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÓÎÑÓÎØÅÓÈÔÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÆÛÐÇ×ÉÛÉÕÍÍØÛÉÍÊÚ×ÈÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÈÔ× Å×ÈÐÛÎØÈÔÛÈÓÉÚ×ÓÎÕÊ×ÏÍÆ×Ø ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÓÈÉÏÛÎØÛÈ×ÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈÈÔ×÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÕ×ÎÙÃ ÷ìûÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÍÖØÊ×ØÕ×ØÍÊÖÓÐÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÓÎÈÍÍÖÈÔ×ÇÎØ×Êé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ×ûÙÈÍÖÈÔ×çéÓÎÙÐÇØ×È×ÊÊÓÈÍÊÓÛÐÉ×ÛÉÈÓØÛÐÅÛÈ×ÊÉÛÎØÎÍÎÈÓØÛÐÅÛÈ×ÊÉÓÎ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÛÎØØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÉÈÔÛÈÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ×ÄÔÓÚÓÈÌÍÎØÓÎÕÍÊÉÙÍÇÊÓÎÕ ÉÔÍÅÍÚÆÓÍÇÉÉÓÕÎÉÍÖÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÓÎÕÍÊÔÛÆ×ØÓÉÙ×ÊÎÓÚÐ×ÚÛÎÑÉÛÎØÔÓÕÔÅÛÈ×ÊÏÛÊÑÉèÔ×÷ìû ÛÐÉÍÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×É×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×èÔ×ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÍÖØÊ×ØÕ×ØÍÊÖÓÐÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐ ÓÎÈÍÅÛÈ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×çéÓÉÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÅÔ×ÎÓÈÓÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 43 ÅÓÈÔé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ×ûÙÈ÷ÎÖÍÊÙ×Ï×ÎÈÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÖÍÊé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÛÉÕÓÆ×ÎÈÍÈÔ×çéûÊÏÃ ùÍÊÌÉÍÖ÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÉÅÔÓÙÔÓÈÛÙÙÍÏÌÐÓÉÔ×ÉÇÎØ×ÊÓÈÉÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÚÊÛÎÙÔ öÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ×é×ÙÈÓÍÎ é×ÙÈÓÍÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÎ×ÎÈÓÈÃÈÍÎÍÈÓÖÃùøöõÍÖÛÎÃÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÏÛÃ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØÓÆ×ÊÈÍÊÍÚÉÈÊÇÙÈÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÖÐÍÅÍÖÍÊÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÙÔÛÎÕ×ÍÊÇÉ×ÛÎÃÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐ ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×Ú×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÍÊÚÛÎÑÍÖÛÎÃÊÓÆ×ÊÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÊÐÛÑ×ÍÊØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÍÊØÓÉÌÍÉ×ÍÖØ×ÚÊÓÉ ÅÛÉÈ×ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÌÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈÅÔ×Ê×ÓÈÏÛÃÌÛÉÉÓÎÈÍÛÎÃÉÈÊ×ÛÏÊÓÆ×ÊÍÊÐÛÑ× ùøöõÇÉ×ÉÈÔ×çéöåéØ×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎÍÖÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÅÔ×ÎÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ×É×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉåÔ×Ê×ùøöõ ÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÓÉÔÍÊÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÈÔ××ÎÈÓÈÃÌÊÍÌÍÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÏÇÉÈÎ×ÕÍÈÓÛÈ×ÛéÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØûÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔùøöõÈÔÛÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ÉÈ×ÊÏÉÇÎØ×ÊÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÏÛÃÚ×ÙÛÊÊÓ×ØÍÇÈÓÎÛÅÛÃÈÔÛÈ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉÈÔ×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×ÕÓÎÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÓÉ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø Local Regulations èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÖÍÇÊÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÊÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÕÍÆ×ÊÎÓÎÕÈÊ××É ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ× ùøöõÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÈÔÛÈÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛÉ×ÈÊÛÈÓÍöÍÊ ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÛÎÃÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÈÍÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÈÍ ÊÛÈÓÍ ÈÊ××ÉÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØêÛÈÓÍÉÆÛÊÃØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÔ×É× ÊÛÈÓÍÉÔÛÆ×Ú××Î×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÙÍÏÌ×ÎÉÛÈ×ÖÍÊÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÏÍÊÈÛÐÓÈÃÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ ÈÊ××ÉÛÎØÈÍ×ÄÌ×ØÓÈ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÊ××íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÛÛÎØ ÈÊìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÓÎÈÔÓÉÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÖÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÍÛÑùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃÅ×ÉÈ×ÊÎÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÚÓÕÐ×ÛÖÏÛÌÐ×Ø×ÍØÛÊÙ×ØÛÊÛÎØÚÐÇ×ÛÈÐÛÉÙ×ØÛÊ ÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÍÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÈÔ×ÉÓÎÕÐ×ÈÊÇÎÑØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛØ×ÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉÅÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×ÏÇÐÈÓÈÊÇÎÑØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛØ×ÛÐÉÍ ÑÎÍÅÎÛÉøÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈúÊ×ÛÉÈô×ÓÕÔÈÍÊøúôÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÊ××É Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÍÊÊ×ÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÉÛÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÌÊÓÆÛÙÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÛÎêÂÍÎÓÎÕ ØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ô×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÎÃÈÊ××ÍÊÕÊÍÆ×ÍÖÈÊ××ÉÅÔÓÙÔÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÖÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈ ÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÓÈÉÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÆÛÐÇ×ÇÎÓËÇ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÕÓÊÈÔÔ×ÓÕÔÈÍÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÔÛÉÚ××ÎÖÍÇÎØÚÃÈÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÈÍÔÛÆ×ÛÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ìÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÓÎÙÐÇØ× Policy 5-8 ìÇÚÐÓÙìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕ÷ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÎØËÇÛÉÓÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÍ ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ÈÔ×ÓÊÙÓÈÃÛÊ×ÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÎ×ÛÊÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØ ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÎÍÎÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉ Policy 5-10 ðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕÎ×ÛÊîÛÈÇÊÛÐæ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ÷ÏÌÔÛÉÓÂ×ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÛÎØÌ×ÉÈ Ê×ÉÓÉÈÛÎÈÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎØÎÍÎÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÕÊÍÇÎØÙÍÆ×ÊÉÅÔ×Î Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 44 Environmental Checklist ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÎ×ÛÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐÃÖÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÍÖ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÖÊÍÏ ØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎ Policy 5-11 îÛÈÇÊÛÐûÊ×ÛìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎìÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÛÎØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÅÔ×ÎÎ×ÅØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Policy 5-13 ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÓÎîÛÈÇÊÛÐûÊ×ÛÉðÓÏÓÈÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÈÍÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÅÓÈÔÌÊ×É×ÊÆÓÎÕÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÔÓÑÓÎÕÔÍÊÉ×ÚÛÙÑÊÓØÓÎÕÏÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÚÓÑÓÎÕÛÎØ ÙÛÏÌÓÎÕ Policy 5-14 ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØåÓÐØÐÓÖ×èÊÛÓÐÉìÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎØÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÚÍÈÔÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÏÍÉÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐÃÖÍÊÈÔ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÈÍÖÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÈÔÛÈÓÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÍÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÌ×ÊÈÔ×éÈÊ×ÛÏïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ìÊÍÕÊÛÏúïì ê×ÌÐÛÙ×èÊ××ÉÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÊ××ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ îÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÍÉÈÈÍÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÊÛÈÓÍÛÎØ ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÍÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÊÛÈÓÍ èÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÈÔ× Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÍÊÛÈÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÛÈÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃ èÔ×ìÐÛÎÈé×Ð×ÙÈÓÍÎùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛìÐÛÎÈÓÎÕè×ÙÔÎÓËÇ×ÉïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÉÌÊ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ìÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÖÍÊê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔúÛÎÑìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄ÷ÍÖÈÔ×éïìÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÛÉÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÍ ÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈðÍÙÛÐÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÕÊÍÅÎÖÊÍÏÍÎÉÓÈ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊ×Ö×ÊÛÚÐ×ÈÍÐÛÊÕ×Ê ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ÊÕÊÍÅÎÉÈÍÙÑÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÐ ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÔ×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÉÓÂ×ØÈÊ××ÉÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÓÎÙÔ×ÉØÚÔÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×É ûÐÐÈÊ××ÉÐÍÉÈÈÍÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÚÃØÓÊ×ÙÈÉ××ØÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÛÙÍÊÎÉÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐ ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÏ××ÈÍÊ×ÄÙ××ØéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÖÍÊÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ Environmental Setting ûèêûÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÏÛØ×ÛÉÓÈ×ÆÓÉÓÈÍÎûÌÊÓÐ ÈÍÛÉÉ×ÉÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØ ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÅÔÛÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÖÛÎÃÔÛØÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÉÓÎÙ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÓÎ åÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×ÛÐÉÍÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎØØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÖÍÊìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÛÎØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÍÛÑÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÅÍÍØÐÛÎØ ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÈÇÊÖÛÎØÍÊÙÔÛÊØõÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÈÇÊÖØÍÏÓÎÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÍÖ ÈÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÎØÍÊÙÔÛÊØØÍÏÓÎÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÅ×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×ØÍÏÓÎÛÎÈ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÃÌ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÍÎÛÊÏÍÊ×ØÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÓÈÉ ×ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÓÉÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÍÛÑÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÂ×ØÛÉÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÃÙÛÏÍÊ×é×ÊÓ×É Platanus racemosa ÓÎéÛÅÃ×Êñ××Ð×ÊåÍÐÖÛÎØ÷Æ×ÎÉ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÛÎØÙÍÛÉÈ Quercus agrifolia ÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÉØÍÏÓÎÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÛÎÍÌÃÅÓÈÔÛÏÓÄÈÇÊ×ÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÇÙÑ×Ã× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 45 Aesculus californicaQuercus lobataUmbellularia californica ÆÛÐÐ×ÃÍÛÑùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃ Populus balsamifera trichocarpaAcer negundo ÙÍÈÈÍÎÅÍÍØÉÉÌÛÎØÚÍÄ×ÐØ×ÊÛÏÍÎÕ Rubus discolor ÍÈÔ×ÊÉçÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉôÓÏÛÐÛÃÛÎÚÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃÅÓÐÐÍÅÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Salix spp.Hedera helixVinca majorArundo donax ÷ÎÕÐÓÉÔÓÆÃÆÓÎÙÛÕÓÛÎÈÊ××ØÛÎØ Sambucus mexicana ÚÐÇ××ÐØ×ÊÚ×ÊÊÃÛÏÍÎÕÍÈÔ×ÊÉ ûÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÛÊ×ÙÐÛÉÉÓÖÓ×ØÛÉÎÍÄÓÍÇÉÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÚÃÈÔ× (Arundo donax) ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛóÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÈùÍÇÎÙÓÐùÛÐóìùõÓÛÎÈÊ××ØÖÍÊ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÓÉÛÊÍÚÇÉÈ Ì×Ê×ÎÎÓÛÐÕÊÛÉÉÈÔÛÈÙÛÎÕÊÍÅ Ö××ÈÈÛÐÐÛÎØÖÍÊÏØ×ÎÉ×ÉÈÛÎØÉÏÛÎÃÏ×È×ÊÉÛÙÊÍÉÉóÈ Giant ØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×ÉÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×çÎÐÓÑ×ÈÔ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÌÐÛÎÈÉÓÈØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×É reed ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÐÓÈÈÐ×ÉÔÛØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÐ×ÛØÓÎÕÈÍÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÅÛÈ×ÊÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØ Giant reed Ê×ØÇÙ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈËÇÛÐÓÈÃÖÍÊÛËÇÛÈÓÙÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÐÉÍÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÐÈ×ÊÉÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÏÍÊÌÔÍÐÍÕÃ ÚÃÊ×ÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÉ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÎÕÖÐÍÅÉíÈÔ×ÊÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÖÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× ÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÉÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÚÃùÛÐóìùÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÆÓÎÙÛ÷ÎÕÐÓÉÔÓÆÃÛÎØôÓÏÛÐÛÃÛÎÚÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÛÎÍÊÙÔÛÊØÍÎ×ÆÛÙÛÎÈÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÛÎØÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÍÇÈ ÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉèÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÙÊ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÊÍÇÕÔÐÃ ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÅÛÐÎÇÈÐÍËÇÛÈÍÐÓÆ×Ð×ÏÍÎÛÎØÈÛÎÕ×ÊÓÎ×èÔ×ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈ ÌÛÊÈÓÉÓÎÖÛÓÊÈÍÕÍÍØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØÓÉÉÈÓÐÐÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÆ×ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÉÎÍÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÎØÉÍÏ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÌÛÉÈÈÔ×ÓÊÌÊÓÏ×ÍÊÛÊ×ØÃÓÎÕèÔ×ÅÛÐÎÇÈÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÛÐÏÍÉÈÛÐÐ ÉÇÖÖ×ÊÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÛÆÓÊÛÐØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÛÎØÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÖÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐéÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ× ÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÛÊ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÕÊÛÉÉ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÌ×Ê×ÎÎÓÛÐÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×òÍÔÎÉÍÎÕÊÛÉÉ (Sorghum halapense), Oxalis pes- ÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÊÇØ×ÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÙÔÛÉú×ÊÏÇØÛÚÇÈÈ×ÊÙÇÌ caprae èÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÔ×ÛÆÓÐÃ Pinus ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ØÛÎØÓÉØÍÏÓÎÛÈ×ØÚÃÐÛÅÎÕÊÛÉÉÛÎØÉÌÛÊÉ×ÏÛÈÇÊ×ïÍÎÈ×Ê×ÃÌÓÎ×ÈÊ××É radiataSequoia sempervirens ÛÎØÃÍÇÎÕ×ÊùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÅÍÍØÈÊ××ÉèÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÈÅÍÌÍÎØ ÛÊ×ÛÉÍÎÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ× óÎÈ×ÎÉ×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÚÍÊØ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÈÍÈÔ××ÛÉÈÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÚÍÊØ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔèÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ìÛÊÑÚÍÊØ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔ ôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÃ èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø×ÎÙÍÏÌÛÉÉ×ÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÉËÇÛÊ×ÏÓÐ×ÉÓÎÅ×ÉÈ×ÊÎ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ðÍÅ×Êì×ÎÓÎÉÇÐÛåÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÛÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÚÃ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÉÓÄÍÈÔ×ÊÙÊ××ÑÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉËÇÓÈÍ ì×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈ×ÛÎØûØÍÚ×ùÊ××ÑÉÛÎØ×ÎÙÍÏÌÛÉÉ×ÉÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖÉËÇÛÊ×ÏÓÐ×ÉèÔ×Ô×ÛØÅÛÈ×ÊÉ ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÈ×ÉÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÉÐÍÌ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÊÇÂïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÉÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖ éÑÃÐÓÎ×úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØìÛÕ×ïÓÐÐêÍÛØÛÎØÖÐÍÅÉÖÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ×ÓÕÔÈÏÓÐ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÌÊÓÆÛÈ× ïÓØÌ×ÎÓÎÉÇÐÛê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐíÌ×ÎéÌÛÙ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈïêíéøÛÎØéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÌÛÊÑ Ê×ÛÙÔÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑøÛÏÛÎØê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊå×ÈÐÛÎØÉÓÎÈÔ×ÇÌÌ×ÊÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÖÍÇÊÌÍÎØÉÈÔÛÈØÊÛÓÎÓÎÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÛÎØÍÎ×ÌÍÎØØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÖÍÊÏ×ÊÊÍÙÑËÇÛÊÊÃøÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÊ×ÈÇÊÎÉÈÍÓÈÉÙÔÛÎÎ×Ð ÛÎØÖÐÍÅÉÛÎÍÈÔ×Ê ÏÓÐ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÇÎÈÃìÛÊÑø××ÌùÐÓÖÖõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÚ×ÖÍÊ×Ê×ÛÙÔÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×åÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÖÐÍÅÉÛÚÍÇÈ Ö××ÈÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÉÈÍÖÐÍÅÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ùÓÈÃ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÖÐÍÅÉÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍôÓÕÔÅÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÙÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖðÍÉûÐÈÍÉéÇÎÎÃÆÛÐ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 46 Environmental Checklist ÛÎØïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅèÔÓÉÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÓÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØ×ØÚÃÇÊÚÛÎØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØ Ê×ÛÙÔ×ÉÖÊ×ËÇ×ÎÈÐÃÕÍØÊÃÓÎÈÔ×ÉÇÏÏ×ÊÈÓÏ×ûÖÈ×ÊÌÛÉÉÓÎÕÇÎØ×ÊôÓÕÔÅÛÃ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑÖÐÍÅÉÓÎÈÍåÔÓÉÏÛÎéÐÍÇÕÔÛÎØÈÔ×Î×ÏÌÈÓ×ÉÓÎÈÍéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃ åÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÖÐÍÅÈÔÊÍÇÕÔéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ØÛÈÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑØÛÏåÓÎÈ×ÊÚÛÉ×ÖÐÍÅÉîÍÆ×ÏÚ×ÊÈÍûÌÊÓÐÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÊÛÎÕ×ÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ ÙÇÚÓÙÖ××ÈÌ×Ê É×ÙÍÎØÙÖÉÛÎØØÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÚÛÉ×ÖÐÍÅÉïÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔíÙÈÍÚ×ÊÛÊ×ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÖÓÆ×ÙÖÉ éùæåøéÈÊ×ÛÏÕÛÇÕ× èÔ××Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×É×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÚ×ÅÓØ×Î×Ø ÊÛÎÕ×ÉÖÊÍÏÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÏ×ÛÎÉ×ÛÐ×Æ×ÐÛÈÈÔ×ÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏ×ÎØÈÍ Ö××ÈÛÈÈÔ× ØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏ×ÎØèÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÊ×ÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÐÃÉÈ××Ì Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÖÓÆ×ÛÎØ Ö××ÈÓÎ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÈÍÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐïÇÙÔÍÖÈÔ× ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÔÛÉÚ××ÎÏÍØÓÖÓ×ØÇÉÓÎÕÊÓÌÊÛÌÛÎØ ÍÊÙÍÎÙÊ×È× ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÖÍÊÖÐÍÍØÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÛÎØ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÌÇÊÌÍÉ×É èÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÅÛÈ×ÊØ×ÌÈÔÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÅÛÉØÍÎ×ÓÎ îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÓÎÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ èÔÓÉÅÛÉØÍÎ×ÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÊÛÓÎÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎõÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÅÛÉÎÍÈ×ÎÙÍÇÎÈ×Ê×ØÓÎ ÈÊ×ÎÙÔ×É Ö××ÈØ××ÌúÛÐÛÎÙ× ÛÎØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÛÉÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÚ×Û ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÓÎÈÔÛÈÊ×ÛÙÔÛÈÈÔÛÈÈÓÏ×óÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ ÛÎÛÊ×ÛÌÛÊÛÐÐ×ÐÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑ ÅÛÉÈÊ×ÎÙÔ×ØÖÍÊÌÊ×É×ÎÙ× ÛÚÉ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉèÅ×ÐÆ×ÈÊ×ÎÙÔ×ÉÅ×Ê×ØÇÕÈÍÛ ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÍÖ×ÓÕÔÈÖ××ÈÛÎØÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÅÛÉÎÍÈ×ÎÙÍÇÎÈ×Ê×ØèÔ×É×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎØÓÙÛÈ× Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÛÎÑÉÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍ ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÍÖÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅÔÓÙÔÈÔÊÓÆ×ÓÎØÛÏÌÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉöÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÎØÇÌÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÛÅÛÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐóÎ úÛÐÛÎÙ×ôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÓÙÉÅÛÐÑ×ØÈÔ× ÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÈÔ× ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ åÓÐØÐÓÖ× íÎûÌÊÓÐ ÛÉÓÈ×ÆÓÉÓÈÅÛÉÏÛØ×ÈÍÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÚÃÛèêûÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ ÈÍÛÉÉ×ÉÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÉÓÈ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÅÔÛÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÖÛÎÃÔÛØÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÉÓÎÙ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÓÎ ÛÎØÈÍÎÍÈ×ÛÎÃÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ× ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÒÇÉÈÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏèÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÎÍÈ×ØÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÛÎØ ÙÍÏÏÍÎÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û÷ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×Ø ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃØ×ÉÓÕÎÍÖÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ éÇÊÆ×ÃÉ ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÖÍÊÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÎÍÎ×ÅÍÊ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÌÊ×É×ÎÈÚ×ÃÍÎØÈÔÍÉ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎ ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉÎÍÈ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅ èÔ×ûÌÊÓÐ ÆÓÉÓÈØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÎÍÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÉÓÎÙ×ìÔÛÉ× ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÍÙÙÇÊÊ×Ø éÇÊÆ×ÃÉÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÖÍÊìÔÛÉ× Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÐÐÖÓÉÔ×ÉÈÔÊ××ÉÌÓÎ×ÉÈÓÙÑÐ×ÚÛÙÑ Gasterosteus aculeatusLavinia symmetricus ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊÍÛÙÔéÛÙÊÛÏ×ÎÈÍÉÇÙÑ×Ê Catostomus occidentalisOncorhynchus mykiss ÛÎØÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ ÊÛÓÎÚÍÅÈÊÍÇÈèÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Å×Ê×ÉÇÚÉ×ËÇ×ÎÈÐÃÙÛÇÕÔÈÛÎØÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Ø×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕ×ÖÖÍÊÈÉÓÎ ÖÍÊÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÒÇÉÈÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×éÇÊÆ×ÃÉ ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÚÃéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÓÎ ÙÍÎÖÓÊÏ×ØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ø ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑîÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÓÎ Procambarus clarkii ÈÔ× ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØðÍÇÓÉÓÛÎÛÊ×ØÙÊÛÃÖÓÉÔÉÓÕÎÛÐÙÊÛÃÖÓÉÔ Pacifastacus leniusculus spp. leniusculusRana catesbeianaCyprinus ÚÇÐÐÖÊÍÕÛÎØÑÍÓ carpio City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 47 éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÐÖÍÊÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Øù×ÎÈÊÛÐ Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍÛÉÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØèÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÓÎéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØåÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÓÉ ÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÛÊ×ÑÎÍÅÎÈÍÓÎÔÛÚÓÈÈÔÓÉÌÛÊÈÍÖ ÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÉ×ÕÕÉÖÊÃÃÍÇÎÕÛÎØÏÛÈÇÊ×ÛØÇÐÈÉÊ×ÈÇÊÎÓÎÕÈÍÉÌÛÅÎ Procyon ùÍÏÏÍÎÛÎÓÏÛÐÉÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÊÛÙÙÍÍÎÉ lotorOdocoileus hemionusMephitis mephitis ìÛÙÓÖÓÙÚÐÛÙÑÈÛÓÐ×ØØ××ÊÉÈÊÓÌ×ØÉÑÇÎÑ Lynx rufusCanis latrans), Pituophis catenifer, Felis ÙÍÃÍÈ×ìÛÙÓÖÓÙÕÍÌÔ×ÊÉÎÛÑ×Ö×ÊÛÐÙÛÈ catus ÚÛÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÎÍÈ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅÛÎØÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÚÓÊØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ûÎÎÇÛÐÚÓÊØÙÍÇÎÈÉÛÊ×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÚÃÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃûÇØÇÚÍÎéÍÙÓ×ÈÃéùæûé ÛÎØÍÆ×Ê ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÊÐÃÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊã×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈ Poecile rufescens ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØ×ùÔ×ÉÈÎÇÈÚÛÙÑ×ØùÔÓÙÑÛØ×× Baeolophus inoratus), Saynoris nigricans íÛÑèÓÈÏÍÇÉ×úÐÛÙÑìÔÍ×Ú×åÍÍØÌ×ÙÑ×Ê Picoides nuttalliiThryomanes bewickiiSitta åÊ×ÎåÔÓÈ×ÚÊ×ÛÉÈ×ØîÇÈÔÛÈÙÔ carolinensis, Megaceryle alcyon. ÛÎØú×ÐÈ×ØñÓÎÕÖÓÉÔ×ÊíÈÔ×ÊÚÓÊØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÏÓÕÊÛÈ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÛÊ×Û Vireo gilvusEmpidonax ÖÍÊÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕåÛÊÚÐÓÎÕæÓÊ×ÍìÛÙÓÖÓÙÉÐÍÌ×öÐÃÙÛÈÙÔ×Ê difficilisContopus sordidulus, Sialia mexicanus, å×ÉÈ×ÊÎåÍÍØì×Å××å×ÉÈ×ÊÎúÐÇ×ÚÓÊØ Tachycineta thalassina, Icterus bullockii, æÓÍÐ×ÈÕÊ××ÎéÅÛÐÐÍÅúÇÐÐÍÙÑÉíÊÓÍÐ×ÛÎØê×Ø Buteo lineatus ÉÔÍÇÐØ×Ê×ØôÛÅÑÛÏÍÎÕÏÛÎÃÍÈÔ×ÊÉéùæûé ÛÎØ úÛÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Eptesicus fuscus Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÚÓÕÚÊÍÅÎÚÛÈÉï×ÄÓÙÛÎÖÊ××ÈÛÓÐ×Ø Tadarida brasiliensisMyotis yumanensis ÚÛÈÉÛÎØãÇÏÛÏÃÍÈÓÉ èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÛÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÊÛÌÈÍÊÉóÎÊ×Ù×ÎÈÃ×ÛÊÉê×Ø Buteo lineatusAccipiter cooperiiElanus ÉÔÍÇÐØ×Ê×ØôÛÅÑôÛÅÑåÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ× leucurus, Tyto albaMegascops kennicottii úÛÊÎíÅÐÛÎØå×ÉÈ×ÊÎéÙÊ××ÙÔíÅÐÔÛÆ×Î×ÉÈ×Ø Ô×Ê×óÎÉÍÏ×Ã×ÛÊÉÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÔÛÉÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ×ØÈÅÍÌÛÓÊÉÍÖúÛÊÎíÅÐÉÛÎØÈÅÍ Falco peregrinus, ÌÛÓÊÉÍÖê×ØÉÔÍÇÐØ×Ê×ØôÛÅÑÉíÈÔ×ÊÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎ Falco columbarius, Accipiter striatus, Buteo ï×ÊÐÓÎéÔÛÊÌÉÔÓÎÎ×ØôÛÅÑê×ØÈÛÓÐ×ØôÛÅÑ jamaicensis, Bubo virginianus ÛÎØõÊ×ÛÈôÍÊÎ×ØíÅÐÛÊ×ÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÈÔ× åÓÐØÐÓÖ×ïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉ ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÛÈ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ÉÛÎØÛÊ× ×ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÈÔ×ÆÓÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØÌ×ÊÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÏÛÎÃÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉåÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÓ×ÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÍÎ×ÅÛÃÌ×ÊÉ×ÛÉÍÎÓÎÈ×ÊÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÓ×ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏ Õ×Î×ÈÓÙÖÐÍÅÛÎØÉÏÛÐÐÈÊÛÆ×ÐÌÛÈÔÅÛÃÉÓ×ØÛÓÐÃÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎ È×ÊÊÓÈÍÊÃåÔÓÐ×ÉÏÛÐÐÈÊÛÆ×ÐÌÛÈÔÅÛÃÉÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÛÈ×ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊØÛÓÐÃÔÍÏ×ÊÛÎÕ× ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÍÊ×ÉÙÛÌ×ÖÊÍÏÌÊ×ØÛÈÍÊÉÈÔ×ÃÛÐÉÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÍÇÈÐÃÓÎÕÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÕ×Î×ÖÐÍÅÛÏÍÎÕ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×É×ÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÛÏÍÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÙÛÎ×ÄÈ×ÎØÖÍÊÏÓÐ×ÉÛÎØÍÙÙÇÊÍÎÛÐÛÊÕ×ÉÙÛÐ× ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÛÎÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Øù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍÛÉÈ ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×Éê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÈÍÖÓÉÔÌÛÉÉÛÕ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ìÔÛÉ×ÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÆÓÈÃ Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÊ×ÛÙÔ×ÉÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉ×ÊÆ×ÉÛÉÛÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊ ÎÇÏ×ÊÍÇÉÚÓÊØÉÏÛÏÏÛÐÉÊ×ÌÈÓÐ×ÉÛÎØÛÏÌÔÓÚÓÛÎÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 48 Environmental Checklist éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉéÌ×ÙÓ×É éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÈÔÍÉ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÛÎÓÏÛÐÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ð×ÕÛÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÍÊ ÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×Ê×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ØÛÉÆÇÐÎ×ÊÛÚÐ×ÈÍÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÐÍÉÉÍÊÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎØ×ÙÐÓÎ×ÚÃÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÍÊ ÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉèêûÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛîÛÈÇÊÛÐ øÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃøÛÈÛÚÛÉ×ùîøøúÉ×ÛÊÙÔÓÎûÌÊÓÐ ÈÍÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔÓÉÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉóÎÈÔÓÉÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØ ÍÊÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÓÉÈ×ØÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÉÙÛÎØÓØÛÈ×ÉÖÍÊÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÛÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ùøöõéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖéÌ×ÙÓÛÐùÍÎÙ×ÊÎ ÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÌ×ÊùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ×ÛÎØ ÌÐÛÎÈÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛîÛÈÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÈéÍÙÓ×ÈÃùîìéÛÎØÈÔ×ùøöõÈÍÚ× ÊÛÊ×ÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØáùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊÛÊ×ÌÐÛÎÈÊÛÎÑ×Øùêìê×Õùêìêúß èÛÚÐ×É ÛÎØ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÓÉÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÌÐÛÎÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÛÉÊÛÊ×ÚÃùîìéÛÎØùøöõÛÎØÅÛÉÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÇÉÓÎÕÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùîøøú ÛÎØÈÔ×ùîìéêÛÊ×ìÐÛÎÈóÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃ óÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÉÈÛÈÇÉ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØÖÐÍÅ×ÊÓÎÕÌ×ÊÓÍØØ×ÊÓÆ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùîøøú ÛÎØùîìéêÛÊ×ìÐÛÎÈóÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃ éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉìÐÛÎÈéÌ×ÙÓ×É é×Æ×ÎÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÌÐÛÎÈÉÅ×Ê×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÏÓÐ×ÊÛØÓÇÉÍÖÈÔ×ÉÈÇØÃÛÊ×Û èÛÚÐ× ÐÓÉÈÉÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÚ×ÖÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×îÍÊÛÊ× ÌÐÛÎÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÖÍÇÎØØÇÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× Table 3.4-1. Special-status Plant Species Potentially Occurring within the Project Area SpeciesFloweringHabitatPotential on Listing 1 PeriodProject Site Status ùêìê å×ÉÈ×ÊÎòÛÎÇÛÊÃúÊÍÛØÐ×ÛÆ×ØÇÌÐÛÎØÖÍÊ×ÉÈÙÐÍÉ×ØðÍÅ Ð×ÛÈÔ×ÊÅÍÍØú ûÌÊÓÐÙÍÎ×ÙÍÎÓÖ×ÊÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈÙÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐéÇÊÆ×Ã×ØÓÎ Dirca ÙÓÉÏÍÎÈÛÎ×ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØîÍÊÈÔùÍÛÉÈ ØÇÊÓÎÕ occidentalisÙÍÎÓÖ×ÊÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÉÙÊÇÚÚÐÍÍÏÌ×ÊÓÍØ ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÅÍÍØÐÛÎØ Ï×ÉÓÙ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÎÍÈ Ï×È×ÊÉØ×È×ÙÈ×Ø ú×ÎðÍÏÍÎØùêìêòÇÎ×ùÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐÙÓÉÏÍÎÈÛÎ×ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÚÇÙÑÅÔ×ÛÈúíÙÈÍÚ×ÊÐÍÅ×ÊÏÍÎÈÛÎ×ÙÍÎÓÖ×ÊÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ ÷ÊÓÍÕÍÎÇÏÌÍÎØ×ÊÍÉÛÌÓÎ×ÉÛÎØÔÓÐÐÉ ÉÛÎØÃ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ÎÇØÇÏÆÛÊ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎ Ï×È×ÊÉ Ø×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÉ ùêìêùÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎ Ï×È×ÊÉ ûÊÙÇÛÈ×ÚÇÉÔûÌÊÓÐîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÏÛÐÐÍÅú é×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×ÊôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ Malacothamnus ÌÊ×É×ÎÈ arcuatus ùêìê ðÍÏÛìÊÓ×ÈÛïÛÃùÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐÙÓÉÏÍÎÈÛÎ×ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÔÍÓÈÛHoitaúíÙÈÍÚ×ÊÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÍÎôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ strobilinaÉ×ÊÌ×ÎÈÓÎ×ÉÍÓÐÉÏ×ÉÓÙ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈ Ï×È×ÊÉ êÍÚÇÉÈùêìêïÛÃéÛÎØÃÌÐÛÙ×ÉÓÎÙÍÛÉÈÛÐÉÙÊÇÚîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÉÌÓÎ×ÖÐÍÅ×Êú é×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×ÊØÇÎ×ÉÉÈÊÛÎØôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ ùÔÍÊÓÂÛÎÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ÊÍÚÇÉÈÛÆÛÊ ÊÍÚÇÉÈÛ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 49 SpeciesFloweringHabitatPotential on Listing 1 PeriodProject Site Status éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛÊ×Øùêìê ûÌÊÓÐòÇÐÃùÓÉÏÍÎÈÛÎ×ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÛÎØÙÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÊÓÚÚÍÎÉùÐÛÊÑÓÛÍÎÉÐÍÌ×ÉÛÎØÎ×ÛÊØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÉôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ ÙÍÎÙÓÎÎÛÉÉÌÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ÛÇÈÍÏÓÄÛ åÍÍØÐÛÎØùêìêö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃõÊÛÉÉÃÉÓÈ×ÉÍÖÈ×ÎÍÎÉ×ÊÌ×ÎÈÓÎ×ÓÎîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÅÍÍÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛØÉú òÇÐÃÙÔÛÌÛÊÊÛÐÆÛÐÐ×ÃÛÎØÖÍÍÈÔÓÐÐ ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ Monolopia ÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØÉÙÓÉÏÍÎÈÛÎ×ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÉÌÊ×É×ÎÈ gracilens ÚÊÍÛØÐ×ÛÖ×ØÇÌÐÛÎØÖÍÊ×ÉÈÉ ðÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈÛÈÇÉñ×Ã ùêìêúìÐÛÎÈÉÊÛÊ×ÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÍÊ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÛÎØ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê× ùêìêèÔÊ×ÛÈùÍØ××ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÏ×ÛÎÓÎÕÉ é×ÊÓÍÇÉÐÃ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÍÆ×Ê ÍÖÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ÎÙ×ÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø ÔÓÕÔØ×ÕÊ××ÛÎØÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÙÃÍÖ ÈÔÊ×ÛÈ öÛÓÊÐÃ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ÎÙ×ÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø ùêìêìÐÛÎÈÉÍÖÐÓÏÓÈ×ØØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÛÅÛÈÙÔÐÓÉÈ îÍÈÆ×ÊÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ Source: CNDDB April 2011, CNPS 2010 éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉåÓÐØÐÓÖ× èÅ×ÐÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅ×Ê×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÏÓÐ×ÊÛØÓÇÉÍÖÈÔ× ÉÈÇØÃÛÊ×ÛèÛÚÐ× ÐÓÉÈÉÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÚ×ÖÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× é×Æ×ÊÛÐÊÛÊ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÉÓÕÔÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛØÇÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ Table 3.4-2. Special-status Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring within the Project Area ListingPotential to be Found at Species NameHabitat 1 Project Site Status ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕöèùééùìÍÎØÙÊ××ÑÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎ ÷ÄÈÊ×Ï×ÐÃðÍÅìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Rana draytoniiÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØ öÍÊÛÕÓÎÕ Û×ÉÈÓÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÌÍÎØ ÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÉ ÓÎÔÛÚÓÈ×ØÚÃÚÇÐÐÖÊÍÕÉ ÅÔÓÙÔÌÊ×ÃÍÎÈÔÓÉ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉîÍÈØ×È×ÙÈ×Ø ØÇÊÓÎÕ ÖÓ×ÐØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ ÛÎØÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××Î ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÉÓÎÙ×ÚÃÛÊ×Û ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉúÛÎÖÓ×ÐØÌ×ÊÉ ÙÍÏÏ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÈÓÕ×ÊÉÛÐÛÏÛÎØ×Êöèéèé×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÓÎîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ambystoma californienseÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØÛÎØÍÛÑ ùééù ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ÉÛÆÛÎÎÛÔ å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×Emys ùééùìÍÎØÉÙÊ××ÑÉÓÎìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÌÊ×É×ÎÈ marmorata ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÉÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØ îÍÈØ×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÖÓ×ÐØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÚÇÈÖÍÇÎØÓÎ ÉÌÊÓÎÕÍÖ ÛÎØÍÎ× ÅÛÉÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ûÌÊÓÐ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 50 Environmental Checklist Potential to be Found at Listing Species NameHabitat 1 Project Site Status éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍÕÛÊÈ×ÊÉÎÛÑ×ö÷é÷öÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖîÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ èÔÛÏÎÍÌÔÓÉÉÓÊÈÛÐÓÉöìÖÊ×ÉÔÅÛÈ×ÊÏÛÊÉÔ×É ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈ È×ÈÊÛÈÛ×ÎÓÛÌÍÎØÉÛÎØÉÐÍÅÏÍÆÓÎÕ ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÓÎéÛÎïÛÈ×Í ùÍÇÎÈÃÛÎØ×ÄÈÊ×Ï× ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÊÎéÛÎÈÛùÊÇÂ ùÍÇÎÈÃìÊ×Ö×ÊÉØ×ÎÉ× ÙÍÆ×ÊÛÎØÅÛÈ×ÊØ×ÌÈÔÉÍÖ ÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÍÎ×ÖÍÍÈê×ËÇÓÊ×É ÇÌÐÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÉÎ×ÛÊÅÛÈ×Ê éÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöèïÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÈÍÖÛÉÈÖÐÍÅÓÎÕìÊ×É×ÎÈÃ×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØ ùÍÛÉÈøìéOncorhynchus Å×ÐÐÍÄÃÕ×ÎÛÈ×ØÅÛÈ×ÊÉÖÍÊ mykiss irideusÚÊ××ØÓÎÕ ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎöìî×ÉÈÉÍÎÐ×ØÕ×ÉÓÎÊÍÙÑìÊ×É×ÎÈ Falco peregrinus anatumÍÇÈÙÊÍÌÉÛÎØÎ××ØÉÍÌ×Î öÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÄÓÉÈÉ ÍÊ×ØÕ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÖÍÊÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕ ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÚÊ××ØÓÎÕ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ùÍÍÌ×ÊÉôÛÅÑûÙÙÓÌÓÈ×ÊåÛÈÙÔø×ÎÉ×ÉÈÛÎØÉÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎìÊ×É×ÎÈ ÙÍÍÌ×ÊÓÓðÓÉÈÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÍÊÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÛÎØ ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈÚÊ××ØÉ Ø×ÙÓØÇÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈÉÎ×ÛÊ ÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÅÛÈ×Ê Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÊ×Ù×ÎÈ éùæûéÚÓÊØÙÍÇÎÈ ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ úÇÊÊÍÅÓÎÕíÅÐûÈÔ×Î×ùééùíÌ×ÎÖÐÛÈÉÓÈ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉ æ×ÊÃðÍÅìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÙÇÎÓÙÇÐÛÊÓÛÆÛÙÛÎÈÖÓ×ÐØÉÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×É ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍ ÛÎØÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÉÅÔ×Ê×ÕÊÍÇÎØ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÎÍÈ ÉËÇÓÊÊ×ÐÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×Î×ÉÈ Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÚÇÊÊÍÅÉ ÖÓ×ÐØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ ðÍÎÕ×ÛÊ×ØíÅÐAsio otus ùééùø×ÎÉ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈðÍÅìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÈÍÏÍÊ×ÍÌ×ÎÛÊ×ÛÉÉÇÙÔ ðÓÈÈÐ×ÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÛÉÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÎØÎÍÈØ×È×ÙÈ×Ø ØÇÊÓÎÕ ÖÓ×ÐØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ åÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ×Elanus öìêÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈìÊ×É×ÎÈ leucurusÈÍÍÌ×ÎÖÓ×ÐØÉÍÛÑ úÊ××ØÓÎÕÌÛÓÊÊ×ÙÍÊØ×ØÛÈ ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÛÎØ ÍÊ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖ ÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉ ùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØìÛÊÑÓÎ Ê×Ù×ÎÈÃ×ÛÊÉ ìÛÐÐÓØÚÛÈûÎÈÊÍÂÍÇÉùééùûÊÓØÐÍÅ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÕÓÍÎÉ æ×ÊÃðÍÅìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÌÛÐÐÓØÇÉÊÍÍÉÈÉÓÎØ××ÌÙÊ×ÆÓÙ×ÉÓÎ ðÓÈÈÐ×ÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÊÍÙÑÖÛÙ×ÉÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉÛÎØ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÚÊÓØÕ×É ÛÊ×Û ìÊ×É×ÎÈÓÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØùééùæÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÚÊÇÉÔÃÛÎØ ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÅÍÍØ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÅÓÈÔê×Ù×ÎÈÐÃÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎ Ø×ÎÉ×ÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÛÎØ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑ ðÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈÛÈÇÉñ×Ã ö÷ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø öèö×Ø×ÊÛÐèÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø é÷éÈÛÈ×÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø éèéÈÛÈ×èÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø ùééùùÛÐÓÖéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖéÌ×ÙÓÛÐùÍÎÙ×ÊÎ éöìéÈÛÈ×öÇÐÐÃìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×Ø Source: CNDDB April 2011 City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 51 åÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÛÑÎÍÅÎÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÍÊÅÓÈÔÛÔÓÕÔÍÊÏ×ØÓÇÏ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÛÊ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅåÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕÈÍ Ú×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉ×ÄÈÊ×Ï×ÐÃÐÍÅÓÈÓÉØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅØÇ×ÈÍÛÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÅÛÊ×Î×ÉÉÛÎØÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×É California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii èÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕùêðöÛÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÛÎØ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÓÉÑÎÍÅÎÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÓÎÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÍÛÑ ÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÛÎØÙÍÎÓÖ×ÊÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈÚÇÈÌÊ×Ö×ÊÉËÇÓ×ÈÌÍÍÐÉÉÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÓÎÕÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÛÎØ Ô×ÛÆÓÐÃÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈ×ØÉÔÍÊ×ÉÖÍÊÚÊ××ØÓÎÕèÔ×É×ÖÊÍÕÉÉÈÛÃÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÉÔÍÊ×ÔÓØØ×Î ÊÛÈÔ×ÊÈÔÛÎÓÎÍÌ×ÎÅÛÈ×Êê×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕÉÖÊ×ËÇ×ÎÈÐÃÍÙÙÇÌÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÚÍØÓ×ÉÍÖÅÛÈ×ÊÛÎØÓÎ ÉÍÏ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÈÔ×É×ÏÛÃÚ×ÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐÖÍÊÌ×ÊÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙ×óÈÓÉÉÌ×ÙÇÐÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈùêðöÏÛÃÐÓ×ØÍÊÏÛÎÈ ØÇÊÓÎÕØÊÃÌ×ÊÓÍØÉÍÖÈÔ×Ã×ÛÊÍÊØÇÊÓÎÕØÊÍÇÕÔÈùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕÉÛÊ×ÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÈÍ ØÓÉÌ×ÊÉ×ÅÓØ×ÐÃØÇÊÓÎÕÛÇÈÇÏÎÅÓÎÈ×ÊÛÎØÉÌÊÓÎÕÊÛÓÎÉòÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×ÉÇÉ×ÈÔ×Å×ÈÌ×ÊÓÍØÉÈÍ ×ÄÌÛÎØÍÇÈÅÛÊØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÓÊÌÍÎØÍÖÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÎØÛØÇÐÈÉÏÛÃÏÍÆ×Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÛËÇÛÈÓÙÛÊ×ÛÉöÊÍÕÉ ØÓÉÌ×ÊÉ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÏÛÎÃÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖÇÌÐÛÎØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÚÊÍÛØ×ÊÊÛÎÕ×ÍÖÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÍÖÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎ èÔ×ÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÚ×ÕÓÎÉÓÎòÛÎÇÛÊÃÛÎØÐÛÉÈÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔïÛÊÙÔïÓÎÓÏÇÏ ÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÛÕ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÈÍÚ×ÈÅÍÃ×ÛÊÉÓÎÏÛÐ×ÉÛÎØÈÔÊ××Ã×ÛÊÉÓÎÖ×ÏÛÐ×Éò×ÎÎÓÎÕÉÛÎØ ôÛÃ×Éö×ÏÛÐ×ÉÐÛÃ ×ÕÕÉÓÎÙÐÇÉÈ×ÊÉÛÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÈÍÛËÇÛÈÓÙÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÅÍÈÍÉÓÄ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÊÖÛÙ×÷ÕÕÉÔÛÈÙÔÓÎÈÅÍÈÍÈÔÊ××Å××ÑÉíÎÙ×ÔÛÈÙÔ×ØÈÔ×ÈÛØÌÍÐ×É Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÛÑ×Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÛÎØ Å××ÑÉÈÍÏ×ÈÛÏÍÊÌÔÍÉ×ØÍÓÎÕÉÍÚ×ÈÅ××ÎïÛÃÛÎØûÇÕÇÉÈ ûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÏÍÉÈÈÛØÌÍÐ×ÉÛÊ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÈÊÛÎÉÖÍÊÏÓÎÈÔ×ÉÇÏÏ×ÊÈÔ×ÃÙÛÎÛÐÉÍÍÆ×ÊÅÓÎÈ×Ê ÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÊÛÎÉÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÙÛÎÈÛÑ×ÛÎÃÅÔ×Ê×ÖÊÍÏÛÚÍÇÈÖÍÇÊÈÍ ÏÍÎÈÔÉùêðöÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÛÌ×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈÅÛÈ×ÊÉÍÇÊÙ×ÅÓÈÔÛÏÓÎÓÏÇÏØ×ÌÈÔÍÖ Ï×È×ÊÉ Ö××Èçéöåé éÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÔÛÉÚ××ÎÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÉÇÚÍÌÈÓÏÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÅÓÈÔÐÓÈÈÐ×ÍÊÎÍ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÈ Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÌÊ×É×ÎÈçéöåé óÎÈÔ×ÛÚÉ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎùêðöÅÓÐÐÛÈÈÛÙÔÈÔ×ÓÊ×ÕÕÉÈÍ ÊÍÙÑÉÅÍÍØÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊØ×ÚÊÓÉ ùêðöÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÇÎÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÐÃØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ×ØÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÏÓÐ×ÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÎÍÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÏÛÌÌ×ØÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉ ×ÄÈÊ×Ï×ÐÃÐÍÅÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÈÍÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÛÊ×ÛèÔÓÉÓÉØÇ×ÈÍ ÈÔ×ÐÛÙÑÍÖÛÎÃùêðöÍÚÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÛÉÈÉÓÄÃ×ÛÊÉ ÈÔ×ØÍÏÓÎÛÎÙ×ÍÖÚÇÐÐÖÊÍÕÉ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÌÍÎØÉÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÑÎÍÅÎÈÍÌÊ×ÃÇÌÍÎÛÎØÍÇÈÙÍÏÌ×È×ùêðöÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÖÛÙÈÈÔÛÈÐÍÈÓÙÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÉÇÙÔÛÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑØÍÎÍÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÌÈÓÏÛÐÚÊ××ØÓÎÕ ùêðöðÍÈÓÙÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÉÇÙÔÛÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÔ×Ê×ÖÐÍÅÉÛÊ×Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÛÎØÉÈÊÍÎÕÛÊ× ÎÍÈÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÇÈÓÐÓÂ×ØÛÉÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÚÃùêðöÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÛÐÛÙÑÍÖÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ÛËÇÛÈÓÙÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊùêðöÈÍØ×ÌÍÉÓÈ×ÕÕÏÛÉÉ×ÉÛÎØÔÓÕÔÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÐÍÅÉÙÛÎ×ÛÉÓÐÃÅÛÉÔÍÇÈ ×ÕÕÏÛÉÉ×ÉéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÈÔÛÈØÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈùêðöÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÊ×ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÐÍÅ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÐÍÅÏÍÆÓÎÕÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÈÔÛÈÉÇÌÌÍÊÈØ×ÎÉ×ÛËÇÛÈÓÙÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎùêðöÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×ÊÇÐ×ØÍÇÈÖÊÍÏ ÍÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÓÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÎØÏÛÃÉÈÓÐÐÚ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÔÓÕÔ ÏÍÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉùêðöÙÛÎÏÍÆ×Ê×ÛØÓÐÃÅÓÈÔÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÛÙÊÍÉÉÇÌÐÛÎØÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎ ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÊÛÓÎÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÓÎÉ×ÛÊÙÔÍÖÊ×ÖÇÕÓÛÛÎØ ÍÊÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ Western Pond Turtle mys marmorata èÔ×å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×÷åìèÓÉÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐ ÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎå×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×ÉÊÛÎÕ×ÓÎÉÓÂ×ÖÊÍÏ ÈÍÓÎÙÔ×ÉÛÎØÛÊ×ÈÔ×ÍÎÐÃÖÊ×ÉÔÅÛÈ×Ê ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃûÊ×ÛèÔÓÉÊ×ÌÈÓÐ×ÍÙÙÇÊÉÓÎÌÍÎØÉÛÎØÉÏÛÐÐÐÛÑ×ÉÅÓÈÔ ÛÚÇÎØÛÎÈÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎóÈÓÉÛÐÉÍÖÍÇÎØÓÎÏÛÊÉÔ×ÉÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÊÓÆ×ÊÉÊ×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÉÛÎØÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÐÃ ÚÊÛÙÑÓÉÔÅÛÈ×ÊèÔ×å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×Ö××ØÉÍÎÛËÇÛÈÓÙÌÐÛÎÈÉÛËÇÛÈÓÙÓÎÆ×ÊÈ×ÚÊÛÈ×ÉÖÓÉÔ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 52 Environmental Checklist ÖÊÍÕÉÛÎØÙÛÊÊÓÍÎóÈÇÉ×ÉÚÛÉÑÓÎÕÉÓÈ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÌÛÊÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÇÚÏ×ÊÕ×ØÐÍÕÉÊÍÙÑÉÏÛÈÉÍÖÖÐÍÛÈÓÎÕ Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÍÌ×ÎÏÇØÚÛÎÑÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÇÎØ×ÊÅÛÈ×ÊÊ×ÈÊ×ÛÈÉÈÍÔÓØ×ÖÊÍÏÌÊ×ØÛÈÍÊÉÛÎØ ÔÇÏÛÎÉö×ÏÛÐ×ÉØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÈÔ×ÓÊ×ÕÕÉÓÎÎ×ÉÈÉÓÎÚÛÎÑÉÍÊÓÎÈÔ×ÙÛÉ×ÍÖÖÍÍÈÔÓÐÐÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÓÎ ÇÌÐÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÉÛÅÛÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏî×ÉÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÏÛÎÃÉÍÓÐÈÃÌ×ÉÖÊÍÏÉÛÎØÃ ÈÍÆ×ÊÃÔÛÊØÛÎØÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÖÍÇÎØÇÌÈÍ Ï×È×ÊÉ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×Êù×ÊÈÛÓÎÖÓÉÔ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÚÇÐÐÖÊÍÕÉÕÛÊÈ×ÊÉÎÛÑ×ÉÅÛØÓÎÕÚÓÊØÉÛÎØÉÍÏ×ÏÛÏÏÛÐÉÌÊ×ÃÍÎÔÛÈÙÔÐÓÎÕÉÛÎØ ÒÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×É èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÉ×ÊÆ×ÉÛÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÉÍÏ× ÐÓÑ×ÐÓÔÍÍØÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÈÇØÃÛÊ×ÛÓÎÆ×ÊÃÐÍÅÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉèÇÊÈÐ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××Î ÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃîÛÈÇÊÛÐÓÉÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÊ×Ù×ÎÈÙÍÎÖÓÊÏ×ØÉÓÕÔÈÓÎÕÍÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÓÎ úÛÎÖÓ×ÐØÌ×ÊÉÙÍÏÏ Steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus èÔ×éÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛùÍÛÉÈøÓÉÈÓÎÙÈ ìÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎé×ÕÏ×ÎÈøìéÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØèÔ×ù×ÎÈÊÛÐùÍÛÉÈøìéÓÉ ÚÍÇÎØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×êÇÉÉÓÛÎêÓÆ×ÊÓÎÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÉÍÇÈÔÈÍéÍËÇ×ÐùÊ××ÑÛÎØÇÌÈÍÚÇÈÎÍÈÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÈÔ×ìÛÒÛÊÍêÓÆ×ÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÛÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØùÊÓÈÓÙÛÐ ÚÃîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×É öÛÙÈÍÊÉÙÛÇÉÓÎÕÈÔ×Ø×ÙÐÓÎ×ÍÖÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÅÓØ×ÉÌÊ×ÛØØ×ÕÊÛØÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÖÊ×ÉÔÅÛÈ×ÊÛÎØ×ÉÈÇÛÊÓÎ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÙÍÎÈÓÎÇÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈØ×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÍÙ×ÛÎÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÌÊ×ÆÛÐ×ÎÙ×ÌÊ×ØÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎÐÓÖ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉîïöé çÊÚÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÈ×ÊÓÏÌÍÇÎØÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÅÛÈ×ÊØÓÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎÔÛÆ×ÛÐÉÍÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉõ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÉÎÍÈÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐÓÏÓÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÖ Ê×ÛÊÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÉÏÍÊ×ÐÓÏÓÈÓÎÕ ìÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÙÍÍÐÌ×Ê×ÎÎÓÛÐÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÍÖÕÍÍØÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÎØ ÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÐÃÙÍÏÌÐ×ÄÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÇÎÓÏÌ×Ø×ØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ÍÙ×ÛÎØÇÊÓÎÕÅÓÎÈ×ÊÛÎØÉÌÊÓÎÕ ÏÍÎÈÔÉÍÖÈÔ×Ã×ÛÊéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÉÌÛÅÎØÇÊÓÎÕÐÛÈ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÛÎØÉÌÊÓÎÕÛÎØÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÚ×ÕÓÎÈÔ×ÓÊ ÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÍÙ×ÛÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÔÓÕÔÖÐÍÅÉÍÖÈÔ×ÖÛÐÐÍÊÅÓÎÈ×ÊÛÎØÓÎÏÍÉÈÙÛÉ×É ÛÈÈ×ÏÌÈÈÍÊ×ÈÇÊÎÈÍÈÔ×ÓÊÎÛÈÛÐÉÈÊ×ÛÏóÈÓÉÎÍÈÇÎÇÉÇÛÐÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÈÍÊ×ÈÇÊÎÈÍÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÌÍÓÎÈÓÎ ÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×Ã×Ï×ÊÕ×ØÛÉÖÊÃéÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖ ÙÐ×ÛÎÕÊÛÆ×ÐÅÓÈÔÏÍÆÓÎÕÅÛÈ×ÊÊÓÖÖÐ×É×ÕÕÉÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÔÛÈÙÔÓÎÛÚÍÇÈÖÍÇÊÅ××ÑÉØ×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈ ÇÌÍÎÅÛÈ×ÊÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ìÍÍÐÉÛÎØÐÛÕÍÍÎÉÐÍÅÓÎÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÙÛÎÛÐÉÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ Ê×ÛÊÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ òÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÐÍÅÆ×ÐÍÙÓÈÃÉÈÊ×ÛÏÏÛÊÕÓÎÉÖÍÊÓÎÓÈÓÛÐÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÊÓÖÖÐ×É ÛÎØÌÍÍÐÉÖÍÊÖ××ØÓÎÕÛÎØÙÍÆ×ÊòÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÅÓÐÐÉÌ×ÎØÍÎ×ÈÍÈÔÊ××Ã×ÛÊÉÓÎÖÊ×ÉÔÅÛÈ×Ê ÍÖÈ×ÎÉÐÍÅÐÃÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÎÕØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ÖÍÊ×Ú×ÙÍÏÓÎÕÉÏÍÐÈÉÛÎØ×ÎÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÍÙ×ÛÎóÎÕ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÈÔ×ÐÛÊÕ×ÊÈÔ×ÉÏÍÐÈÛÈÈÔ×ÈÓÏ×ÍÖ×ÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÍÙ×ÛÎÈÔ×ÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÈÔÛÈÓÈÅÓÐÐ Ê×ÈÇÊÎÛÉÛÎÛØÇÐÈÈÍÉÌÛÅÎéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÉÌ×ÎØÍÎ×ÍÊÈÅÍÃ×ÛÊÉÓÎÈÔ×ÍÙ×ÛÎÚ×ÖÍÊ× Ê×ÈÇÊÎÓÎÕÈÍÉÌÛÅÎíÎÐÃÛÉÏÛÐÐÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÒÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÉÇÊÆÓÆ×ÉÈÍÏÛÈÇÊÓÈÃ çÎÐÓÑ×ÉÛÐÏÍÎÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÇÉÇÛÐÐÃØÍÎÍÈØÓ×ÛÖÈ×ÊÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÙÛÎÊ×ÈÇÊÎÈÍÈÔ×ÍÙ×ÛÎÈÍ Ê×Ì×ÛÈÈÔ×ÓÊÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÕÛÓÎÓÎÈÔ×Î×ÄÈÃ×ÛÊÉ ùÍÍÐÙÐ×ÛÎÅÛÈ×ÊÓÉ×ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÛÐÐÉÈÛÕ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÐÓÖ×ÙÃÙÐ×÷Ð×ÆÛÈ×ØÅÛÈ×Ê È×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÍÖ ÙÛÎÔÓÕÔÐÃÓÏÌÛÓÊÈÔ×ÕÊÍÅÈÔÊÛÈ×ÍÖÒÇÆ×ÎÓÐ×ÉÓÖÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÖÍÍØÓÉ ÎÍÈÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×éÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÛÎÚ×ÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØÅÛÈ×ÊØÓÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎöÍÊ ×ÄÛÏÌÐ××ÊÍÉÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×É×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÔÓÙÔÙÍÇÐØÚÇÊÃÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÕÊÛÆ×ÐÉ ÐÍÅ×ÊÖÐÍÅÉÙÍÇÐØÓÏÌ×Ø×ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ÉÇÏÏ×ÊÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 53 Coopers Hawk Accipiter cooperii èÔ×ôÛÅÑÓÉÍÎùøöåÛÈÙÔðÓÉÈÛÎØÛÐÍÎÕÅÓÈÔÈÔ× Accipiter striatusAccipiter gentilis ÉÔÛÊÌÉÔÓÎÎ×ØÔÛÅÑÛÎØîÍÊÈÔ×ÊÎõÍÉÔÛÅÑÓÉÛÏ×ÏÚ×ÊÍÖ ÈÔ×Õ×ÎÇÉûÙÙÓÌÓÈ×ÊèÔ×É×ÔÛÅÑÉÔÛÆ×Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÉÔÍÊÈÅÓÎÕÉÛÎØÐÍÎÕÈÛÓÐÉÛÎØÛÊ×ÍÖÈ×ÎØÓÖÖÓÙÇÐÈ ÈÍØÓÉÈÓÎÕÇÓÉÔÖÊÍÏÍÎ×ÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊéÓÚÐ×Ã ôÛÅÑÉÓÎÔÛÚÓÈØ×ÎÉ×ÉÈÛÎØÉÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÍÊÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÛÎØØ×ÙÓØÇÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈÉÎ×ÛÊÅÛÈ×ÊèÔ×ÃÙÛÎÚ×ÖÍÇÎØÇÌÈÍ Ö××ÈÓÎ ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎöÍÊÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÌÛÊÈÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÓÉÎÍÎÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÉÍÏ×ÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐÃ ÛÈÔÓÕÔ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÓÎÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÊÎÌÛÊÈÉÍÖÓÈÉÊÛÎÕ×ÅÓÐÐÏÍÆ×ØÍÅÎÉÐÍÌ×ÍÊÉÍÇÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÏÍÎÈÔÉèÔ×ÓÊØÓ×ÈÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÉÏÛÓÎÐÃÍÖÉÏÛÐÐÚÓÊØÉÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÛ×ÊÓÛÐÌÇÊÉÇÓÈÚÇÈÈÔ×Ã ÏÛÃÛÐÉÍÖ××ØÍÎÉÏÛÐÐÏÛÏÏÛÐÉÊ×ÌÈÓÐ×ÉÛÎØÛÏÌÔÓÚÓÛÎÉúÍÈÔÌÛÊ×ÎÈÉÔ×ÐÌÊÛÓÉ×ÈÍÃÍÇÎÕ ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÏÛÐ×ÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÏÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÍØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÓÎÙÇÚÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÛÊÐÃÎ×ÉÈÐÓÎÕÉÈÛÕ×É÷ÔÊÐÓÙÔ ûÌÛÓÊÍÖôÛÅÑÉÔÛÉÎ×ÉÈ×ØÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÈÈÔ×ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎ êÛÎÙÔ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÙ×ÐÉ×ÛÙÔÉÌÊÓÎÕÖÍÊÈÔ×ÐÛÉÈÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÃ×ÛÊÉ White-tailed Kite Elanus leucurus èÔ×åÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ×ÓÉÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÛÎØÓÉ ÛÃ×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÛÎØÚÊ××Ø×ÊÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈÏÇÙÔÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛèÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÖÍÇÎØÓÎÐÍÅ ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÍÊÉÛÆÛÎÎÛÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÛÐÍÎÕÅÓÈÔÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÍÌ×ÎÖÓ×ÐØÉæ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÛÎØÌÊ×ÃÛÚÇÎØÛÎÙ×ÌÐÛÃÛÎÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÊÍÐ× ÓÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÇÓÈÛÚÓÐÓÈÃøÇÎÑåÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ×ÉÔÇÎÈÊÍØ×ÎÈÉÓÎÍÌ×ÎÖÓ×ÐØÉ ÚÃÔÍÆ×ÊÓÎÕÛÎØÈÔ×ÎØÊÍÌÌÓÎÕÉÈÊÛÓÕÔÈÈÍÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÎØéÓÚÐ×Ã úÍÈÔÉ×Ä×ÉÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÈÍ Î×ÉÈÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×ÇÌÌ×ÊÈÔÓÊØÍÖÈÊ××ÉÊÛÎÕÓÎÕÖÊÍÏ Ö××ÈÈÍ Ö××ÈÈÛÐÐî×ÉÈÈÊ××ÉÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃ ÖÍÇÎØÍÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ØÕ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÓÉÍÐÛÈ×ØÍÊÌÛÊÈÉÍÖÙÍÎÈÓÕÇÍÇÉÖÍÊ×ÉÈ×ØÛÊ×ÛÉûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÙÐÇÈÙÔ ÉÓÂ×ÓÉÖÍÇÊ×ÕÕÉùÔÓÙÑÉÖÐ×ØÕ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÖÍÇÊÈÍÖÓÆ×Å××ÑÉÛÖÈ×ÊÔÛÈÙÔÓÎÕøÇÎÑ øÇÊÓÎÕ ÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÛÌÛÓÊÍÖåÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ×ÉÅÛÉÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÛ ïÍÎÈ×Ê×ÃÌÓÎ×ÈÊ××ÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÛÌÛÓÊÔÛÉÎ×ÉÈ×ØÔ×Ê×ÈÔÊ××ÍÖÈÔ× ÖÓÆ×ÉÇÚÉ×ËÇ×ÎÈÃ×ÛÊÉ American Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus anatum èÔ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÓÉÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÖÇÐÐÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×Ø ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉðÓÑ×úÛÐØ÷ÛÕÐ×ÉÈÔ×ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÅÛÉÛØØ×ØÈÍÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÐÓÉÈØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖøøèûÖÈ×ÊØ×ÙÛØ×ÉÍÖÅÍÊÑÈÍÛÓØÓÎ ÓÈÉÊ×ÙÍÆ×ÊÃÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×Ê×ÓÎÈÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ÖÖÍÊÈÉÈÔ×ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÔÛÉÊ×ÙÍÆ×Ê×Ø ×ÄÈ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÓÈÅÛÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÐÓÉÈÓÎÛÎØÊ×ÏÍÆ×Ø ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÐÓÉÈÓÎ íÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÅÓØ×ÉÌÊ×ÛØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔ×ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÍÙÙÇÊÉÍÎ×Æ×ÊÃÙÍÎÈÓÎ×ÎÈ ×ÄÙ×ÌÈûÎÈÛÊÙÈÓÙÛèÔ×ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÎ×ÉÈÉÍÎÔÓÕÔÙÐÓÖÖÉÛÎØÍÎÚÛÊ×Ð×ØÕ×ÉûÎ×ÛÊÚÃÅÛÈ×Ê ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×ÉÖÍÊÛÕ×ÏÍÉÈÙÍÏÏÍÎÐÃÓÎÍÌ×ÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉ ÉÇÙÔÛÉÏÛÊÉÔ×ÉÍÌ×ÎÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØÉÙÍÛÉÈÛÐÉÈÊÛÎØÉÛÎØÚÍØÓ×ÉÍÖÅÛÈ×ÊÅÔ×Ê×ÌÊ×Ã ×ÉÙÛÌ×ÛÈÈÛÙÑèÔ×ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃ×ÛÈÉÉÍÎÕÚÓÊØÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ØÓÎÖÐÓÕÔÈ ÛÎØÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÙÛÎÚ×ÖÍÇÎØ×ÛÈÓÎÕÊÍØ×ÎÈÉúÊ××ØÓÎÕÈÓÏ×ÉÆÛÊÃØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÐÛÈÓÈÇØ×óÎ ÉÍÇÈÔ×ÊÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈ×ÕÕÓÉÐÛÓØÏÓØÈÍÐÛÈ×ö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃÅÔÓÐ×ÓÎÎÍÊÈÔ×ÊÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈ ×ÕÕÓÉÐÛÓØÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÓÎïÛÃÚÇÈÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÙÐÇÈÙÔ×ÉÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÐÛÈ×ÛÉé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×ÊåÔÓÈ××ÈÛÐ ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎÉÛÊ×ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÖÊ×ËÇ×ÎÈÐÃÓÎïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑèÔ×ÏÍÉÈÊ×Ù×ÎÈ Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÍÚÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÓÎûÌÊÓÐ ÚÃÏ×ÏÚ×ÊÉÍÖéùæûéóÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÇÎÐÓÑ×ÐÃÖÍÊÈÔÓÉ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÍÎ×ÉÈÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×Û Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 54 Environmental Checklist San Francisco Dusky-footed Woodrat Neotoma fuscipes annectens éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÓÉÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ éÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖéÌ×ÙÓÛÐùÍÎÙ×ÊÎèÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÓÉÛÉÇÚÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÈÔ× ØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÈÔÛÈÍÙÙÇÊÉÓÎÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÊÇÂïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÉÛÎØÓÎÈÔ×÷ÛÉÈúÛÃèÔ×ØÇÉÑÃ ÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÓÉÛÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÎÍÙÈÇÊÎÛÐÏÛÏÏÛÐÈÔÛÈÍÙÙÇÊÉÓÎÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÚÊÇÉÔÃÛÎØÅÍÍØ×Ø ÛÊ×ÛÉèÔ×ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÚÇÓÐØÉÉÈÓÙÑÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÇÌÈÍ Ï×È×ÊÉÐÍÎÕÛÎØÛÏ×È×ÊÓÎÔ×ÓÕÔÈÖÍÊÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕ èÔ×É××ÐÛÚÍÊÛÈ×ØÅ×ÐÐÓÎÕÉÔ×ÐÌÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÖÊÍÏÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ××ÄÈÊ×Ï×ÉÛÎØ ÌÊ×ØÛÈÍÊÉèÔ×ØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈ×ÛÈÉÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÅÍÍØÃÌÐÛÎÈÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÐ×ÛÆ×É ÛÎØÚ×ÊÊÓ×É ÷ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÅÍÍØÊÛÈÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÅÛÉÖÍÇÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÌÊÓÍÊÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖìÔÛÉ×åÍÍØÊÛÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÏÇÐÈÓÌÐ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔÓÉÈÓÏ×ÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÛÈïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑ Discussion: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. èÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ÉÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÍÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÍÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÊØÉÚÛÈÉÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎóÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÓÎÈÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÎÐ×ÛÉÔØÍÕÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÊ×ÛÐÉÍÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ØûÐÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÆÍÓØ×ØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ Ð×Æ×ÐÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅÛÎØÓÎùÔÛÌÈ×Ê ÛÎØïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅ ùêðöåìèÛÎØåÍÍØÊÛÈ ûÉÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉ×ÄÈÊ×Ï×ÐÃÐÍÅÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÈÔ×ùêðöÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÍÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÛÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖÚÇÐÐÖÊÍÕÛÏÛÒÍÊÌÊ×ØÛÈÍÊÍÖ ùêðöÓÎÈÔ×ÌÍÎØÉÛÈÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÖÛÙÈÍÊÉùêðöÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÓÎ ÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñè×ÎùêðöÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ÎÙ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÖÓÆ×ÏÓÐ×ÊÛØÓÇÉÍÖÈÔ× Å×Ê×Ê×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ùîøøúÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÛÎØ èÔÊ××ÖÊÍÏ ÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×Ø ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÅÔÓÐ×ÈÔÊ××ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕÉ×Æ×ÎÊ×ÙÍÊØÉÛÊ×ÖÊÍÏÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÛÎØÛÊ×É×ÌÛÊÛÈ×ØÚÃÇÊÚÛÎØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈèÔ×ÙÐÍÉ×ÉÈùêðöÉÓÕÔÈÓÎÕÅÛÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÏÓÐ×ÉÅ×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ùîøøú ùêðöÅ×Ê×ÎÍÈØ×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎ ÛÎØÓÈÅÛÉÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÐÍÅÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊùêðöÈÍÚ× ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛîÍÎ×Å×Ê×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎ éÇÊÆ×ÃÉÚÃéÛÎÈÛ ùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÔÛÆ×ÛÐÉÍÎÍÈÖÍÇÎØùêðöÓÎÈÔÓÉÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑóÈÓÉ ×ÄÈÊ×Ï×ÐÃÇÎÐÓÑ×ÐÃÚÇÈÙÍÎÙ×ÓÆÛÚÐ×ÈÔÛÈÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐùêðöÙÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÇÌÐÛÎØÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÊÛÓÎÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÔÓÕÔÏÍÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×É èÔ×Ê×ÓÉÔÓÕÔ×ÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊåìèÛÎØØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× èÔÊ××Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÉÓÕÔÈÓÎÕÉÍÖåìèÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÔÛÐÖÏÓÐ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÛÉÊ×Ù×ÎÈÐÃÛÉ èÔ× ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÎØåìèÅ×Ê×ÎÍÈØ×È×ÙÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎ ÛÎØÓÈÅÛÉÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÛÈ ÈÔÛÈÈÓÏ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê×ÅÛÉÛÐÍÅÈÍÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÎØåìèÈÍÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 55 ÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÊ×ÛèÔ×ùÓÈÃîÛÈÇÊÛÐÓÉÈÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÔÛÉÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÓÎ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÓÎÊ×Ù×ÎÈÃ×ÛÊÉÛÎØÍÎ×ÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÓÎØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÖÅÍÍØÊÛÈÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×Å×Ê×ÖÍÇÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖìÔÛÉ×ó éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ùÓÈÃîÛÈÇÊÛÐÓÉÈÉÓÕÔÈ×ØÛåìèÍÎÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑÉÍÖÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑÛÈïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÓÎ èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÊ×Ù×ÎÈÉÓÕÔÈÓÎÕÉÈÍÙÍÎÖÓÊÏÈÔÛÈåìèÓÉÉÈÓÐÐ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÓÈÓÉÛÉÉÇÏ×ØÈÔÛÈåìèÙÍÇÐØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÍÙÙÇÊ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÛÆ×ÊÃÉÏÛÐÐÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈ ÛÎØåìèÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÖÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÎÕ È×ÊÏóÎÈÔ×ÇÎÐÓÑ×ÐÃ×Æ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐùêðöÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÍÊåìèÛÎØ ÍÊÈÔ×ÓÊÎ×ÉÈÉÛÊ× ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÕÊÍÇÎØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÔ×ÛÆÃ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÔÛÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Impact BIO-1: óÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÇÌÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈùêðöåìè ÛÎØ ÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÛÎØÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÔÇÏÛÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍåìè ùêðöÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð Mitigation Measure BIO-1a: ìÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎéÇÊÆ×ÃÛÎØùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ×ûÙÈÓÍÎÉ öÍÇÊØÛÃÉÍÊÖ×Å×ÊÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÛÊÈÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏÍÎ× ØÛÃÈÓÏ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÖÍÊùêðöåìèÛÎØéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈèÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÅÍÊÑ ÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÛÎÃÚÇÊÊÍÅÉÊÍÙÑÉÛÎØÅÍÍØÌÓÐ×ÉÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÚ×ØÓÉÈÇÊÚ×ØÚÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈ×ØÖÍÊùêðöåìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈóÖùêðöÓÉØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ× Ø×ÐÛÃ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×çéöåéÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÅÈÍÌÊÍÙ××ØóÖØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÉÇÊÆ×ÃåìèÍÊ ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÈÔ×ùøöõÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÅÈÍÌÊÍÙ××Ø óÖÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎùêðöÓÉØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÉÇÉÌ×ÎØ×ØÓÎÈÔ× ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÎÍÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÛÎØçéöåéÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÅ ÈÍÌÊÍÙ××ØóÖÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎåìèÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃ ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÉÇÉÌ×ÎØ×ØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÎÍÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃèÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×Û ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÍÊËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÈÍÛÉÉÓÉÈÓÎÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÛÎÓÏÛÐÉóÎÈÔ×ÌÛÉÈùøöõÔÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÉÖÍÊÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×ÉÉÈÛÈÓÎÕÈÔÛÈ ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÓÉØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖÓÈÓÉÏÍÆÓÎÕÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÓÎ ÅÔÓÙÔÓÈÅÛÉØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÍÊÓÖÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÓÉÍÙÙÇÌÃÓÎÕÈÔ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÍÊÚÛÉÑÓÎÕ øÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÖÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×Ø×È×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÓÈÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÍÊËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÅÓÐÐÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÊ×ÅÉóÖÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÓÉÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÅÓÐÐÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÛÎØÛÐ×ÊÈÅÍÊÑÙÊ×ÅÉÈÍØ×ÐÛÃÅÍÊÑÓÖÓÈ ÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛÍÊÚ×ÕÓÎÉÈÍÏÍÆ×ÈÍÅÛÊØÍÊÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛóÖÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÈÍÚ× ÈÊÛÆ×ÐÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÇÌÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÍÛÎ×ÛÊÚÃÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÓÈ×ÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÙ×ÛÉ×ÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ× ÛÉÛÖ×ØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×èÔ×ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐ ÖÊÍÏÛØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÓÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÅÛÎØ×ÊÚÛÙÑÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛóÖÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÓÉÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÛÎØÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÈÍÚ×ÍÙÙÇÌÃÓÎÕÈÔ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈÖÍÊÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕ ÚÛÉÑÓÎÕÍÊÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÊÓÈÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÈÓÆ×ÉÅÓÐÐÙÍÎÈÛÙÈùøöõÖÍÊÕÇÓØÛÎÙ× óÖÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×Ø ÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÉÇÉÌ×ÎØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÛÎØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÎÍÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃèÔ× ùÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÍÊËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÈÍÛÉÉÓÉÈÓÎÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÉùøöõÔÛÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÙÙ×ÌÈ×ØÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÖÍÊ ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ× ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÔÍÇÉ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×Ø ÍÖÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÃÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 56 Environmental Checklist ÛèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÊÑÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÊÍÇÈ×ØÈÍÛÆÍÓØÈÔ×ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÔÍÇÉ×ÚÃÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ Ö××È ÚóÖÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×Ê×ÊÍÇÈ×ØÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÓÈÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÊÍÇÈ×ØÛÉÖÛÊ ÛÅÛÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÚÇÈÎÍÈÙÐÍÉ×ÊÈÔÛÎÖ××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×éÛÖ×ÈÃ ÛÎØ ÍÊÉÓÐÈÖ×ÎÙÓÎÕÖÍÊÔÍÇÉ×ÉØÍÅÎÉÐÍÌ×ÅÓÐÐÚ××Ê×ÙÈ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÛÐÐÔÍÇÉ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎ Ö××ÈÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÈÍÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÙóÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈÏÇÉÈÕÍØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÖ××ÈÍÖÛÔÍÇÉ×ùøöõÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú×ÙÍÎÉÇÐÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÅÍÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÍÌÈÓÍÎÉ ÓóÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÓÎÛÙÈÓÆ×É××ÑÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÖÊÍÏùøöõÈÍØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÎØ Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÉÈÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÚÃÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÛÎÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ×íÎ×ÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ× ÚÇÓÐÈÖÍÊ×Æ×ÊÃÍÎ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÛÙÈÓÆ×ÔÍÇÉ× ÓÓóÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÛÙÈÓÆ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÅÓÐÐÚ×ÉÍÇÕÔÈÖÊÍÏùøöõÈÍÈÊÛÌÈÔ× ÍÙÙÇÌÛÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ× ØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÎ×ÅÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ× ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ØÔÍÇÉ×ÛÎØÊ×Ð×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÍÙÙÇÌÛÎÈÓÎÈÍÈÔ× Î×ÅÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ×èÔ×Î×ÅÔÍÇÉ×ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÉÙÐÍÉ×ÈÍÓÈÉÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÉÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÛÎØÛÉÖÛÊÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈÛÉÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÈÍÚ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉóÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÓÉÈÍÚ×ÏÍÆ×ØØÍÅÎÉÐÍÌ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈ ×ÄÈÊÛÌÊ×ÙÛÇÈÓÍÎÉÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÛÑ×ÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÌÐÃÅÍÍØÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÈÍÉÈÍÌÖÛÐÐÓÎÕ ÉÐÓØÓÎÕ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÖÊÍÏÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÎÕÈÔ×Î×ÅÔÍÇÉ×ôÍÇÉ×ÉÉÔÍÇÐØÍÎÐÃÚ×ÏÍÆ×ØÓÎÈÔ××ÛÊÐÃ ÏÍÊÎÓÎÕØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÎÍÎÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎíÙÈÍÚ×ÊÈÔÊÍÇÕÔö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃóÖÈÊÛÌÌÓÎÕÔÛÉ ÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÊ××ÙÍÎÉ×ÙÇÈÓÆ×ÎÓÕÔÈÉÛÎØÎÍÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ø ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ØÛÎØÛÎ×ÅÔÍÇÉ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Mitigation Measure BIO-1b ÷ÏÌÐÍÃ××÷ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎìÊÍÕÊÛÏûÎ×ÏÌÐÍÃ×××ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÔÛÐÐ ÛÚÊÓ×ÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÚÃÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×ÛÚÐ×ÓÎÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÎØÉÈÛÈ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÚÓÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØÐ×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÓÆ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍ×ÄÌÐÛÓÎÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÉÈÍÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊèÔ× ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÛØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÍÖùêðöåìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ Î××ØÉÛÎ×ÄÌÐÛÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈÇÉÍÖùêðöåìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÛÅÉÛÎØÛÐÓÉÈÍÖÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÚ×ÓÎÕÈÛÑ×ÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍùêðöåìèÛÎØ ÅÍÍØÊÛÈØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉùÊ×ÅÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÓÖÛùêðöÓÉÖÍÇÎØÓÈÓÉÈÍÚ×Ð×ÖÈ ÛÐÍÎ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÊ×ÏÛÎùÓÈÃÛÎØÈÔ×çéöåéÏÇÉÈÚ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃðÓÑ×ÅÓÉ×ÓÖÛ åìèÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÎ×ÉÈÓÉÖÍÇÎØÓÈÓÉÈÍÚ×Ð×ÖÈÛÐÍÎ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÊ×ÏÛÎùÓÈÃÛÎØùøöõ ÏÇÉÈÚ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃ Mitigation Measure BIO-1c: éÌ××ØðÓÏÓÈæ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈØÊÓÆ×ÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÏÓÐ×ÉÌ×Ê ÔÍÇÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛóÖÛÎÃåìèùêðöÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÊ×É××ÎÓÎÈÔ×ÌÛÈÔÍÖÛÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÔ× Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÔÛÐÐÉÈÍÌÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÓÉÍÇÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÛÈÔìÛÊÑ×ØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ× ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÔ×ÙÑ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÎ×ÛÈÔÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÎÍåìèùêðöÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈ ÛÊ×ÍÎÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× Implementation: ëÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊÛÎØÛÐÐÙÊ×ÅÏ×ÏÚ×ÊÉ Timing: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØÛÚÍÆ× Monitoring: ÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÈÍÉÇÚÏÓÈÛÐ×ÈÈ×ÊÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÖÉÇÊÆ×ÃÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÈÍ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÚìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÊ×ÅÈÍÉÓÕÎÛÉÔ××ÈÖÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÌÈÍÖùêðö åìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÈÊÛÓÎÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÓÎÉÔ××ÈÔ×ÐØÚÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊ ÙìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊÈÍ×ÎÖÍÊÙ×ÉÌ××ØÐÓÏÓÈÛÎØÌÛÊÑ×ØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÙÔ×ÙÑ éÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÊ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ùÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÈÍÚ×Ø×ÅÛÈ×Ê×ØøÇÊÓÎÕÈÔÓÉØ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÌÍÍÐÉÅÍÇÐØÖÍÊÏÓÎÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØèÔ×Ê×ÓÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÖÍÊÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÈÍÚ×ÙÍÏ×ÉÈÊÛÎØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×É×ÓÉÍÐÛÈ×ØÌÍÍÐÉéÈÊÛÎØ×ØÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÅÍÇÐØ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 57 Î××ØÈÍÚ×ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ØÛÎØÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÍÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÎØØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÊ×ÛÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÉ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÓÎÛÖÓÉÔÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÈÍÚ×Ê×ÆÓ×Å×ØÚÃîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×Éê×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÔÛÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÈÛÑ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÛéÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØûÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÅÓÈÔùøöõÛÉÓÈ ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÉÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÙÊ××ÑÛÊ×ÛÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÖÓÉÔÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×Éûé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ×îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐíÙ×ÛÎÓÙÛÎØûÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎîÛÈÓÍÎÛÐïÛÊÓÎ× öÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×Éé×ÊÆÓÙ×îíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ûÊÏÃùÍÊÌÉÍÖ÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÉçéûù÷ÅÛÉ ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÓÎ ÈÍÛØØÊ×ÉÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑ ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉÓÉÉÇ×ØÛúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎûÌÊÓÐ ÛÎØ ÛÎÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÛÐÈÛÑ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈèÔÓÉúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÏÓÎÓÏÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÛÉÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×úÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎ ÖÍÊìÔÛÉ×ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÛÎ×ÅúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎÛÎØÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÛÐÈÛÑ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØóÈÓÉ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÏÓÎÓÏÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ØÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÖÍÊìÔÛÉ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈ×ØÓÎÛÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÛÎØÛÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÍÇÈÙÍÏ× èÔ×çéûù÷ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎÓÎÕÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÛÎØåÛÈ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×çé èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅÓÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÈÔ×çéûù÷ÛÎØÈÔ×çéûù÷ÅÓÐÐ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÓÉÉÇ×Û îÛÈÓÍÎÅÓØ×ì×ÊÏÓÈÍÊÛÎóÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐì×ÊÏÓÈÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÛÎóÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐì×ÊÏÓÈÓÉØ××Ï×ØÏÍÊ×ÐÓÑ×ÐÃ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÈÍÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×É×Æ×ÊÛÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌÔÛÉ×Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÈÍ ÛÆÍÓØÛÎØ ÍÊÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É×ÕÛÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÃÌÛÉÉÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÛÙÙ×ÌÈÛÚÐ×ÈÍîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×Éçéûù÷ÛÎØùøöõØ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÚÃËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×Ø ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÛÎØÛÉÎ××Ø×ØÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÍÊÕÛÎÓÉÏÉÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÚÃ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÛÐÐÍÈÔ×Êè×ÊÏÉÛÎØùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×úÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×Ø Impact BIO-2: ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÛÑ×ÍÖÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÙÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊØÇ×ÈÍÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÛÎØ Ø×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É Mitigation Measure BIO-2: ú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛ æÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ úïìôÛÎØÚÍÍÑÛÎØéÈÊ×ÛÏïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ìÊÍÕÊÛÏÅÍÇÐØ Ú×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÇÉ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÉ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØØÇ×ÈÍØ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕÍÊÉ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÖÓÐÐ×ØÊÇÎÍÖÖ×ÎÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚÛÎÑÐÛÃÚÛÙÑÛÎØ ÍÊ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ É××ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÖÍÊúïìÉ èÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÏÍØÓÖÓ×ØØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÍÇÈÙÍÏ×ÍÖÈÔ×îíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×É úÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎ ÷ÄÙ×ÊÌÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ× éùæåøúïìôÛÎØÚÍÍÑ åë ø×ÅÛÈ×Ê úÃÌÛÉÉåÛÈ×ÊÛÈîÍÎÈÓØÛÐéÓÈ×É åëûÆÍÓØ÷ÊÍÉÓÍÎåÔ×Îê×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕöÐÍÅÉ åë÷ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØé×ØÓÏ×ÎÈùÍÎÈÊÍÐï×ÛÉÇÊ×É åë ìÇÏÌ õ×Î×ÊÛÈÍÊé×ÈíÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× åëéÍÓÐéÈÍÙÑÌÓÐ×É åë ùÍÎÙÊ×È×çÉ×î×ÛÊåÛÈ×ÊÅÛÃÉ åëõÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ úóïÓÎÓÏÓÂ×éÈÊ×ÛÏûÙÙ×ÉÉóÏÌÛÙÈÉ úó éÛÐÆÛÕ×îÛÈÓÆ×ûËÇÛÈÓÙæ×ÊÈ×ÚÊÛÈ×ÉÖÊÍÏø×ÅÛÈ×Ê×ØùÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉ úó ùÍÎØÇÙÈóÎùÔÛÎÎ×ÐåÍÊÑøÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×øÊÃé×ÛÉÍÎ úóê×ÏÍÆ×è×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃöÓÐÐÉÛÉûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 58 Environmental Checklist åëéÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ØùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× ôï æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈöÇ×ÐÓÎÕ ôïæ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ïÓÕÊÛÈÓÎÕÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕúïìÉÛÎØðÓÏÓÈ×Ø íÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕì×ÊÓÍØÉðíìÉÉ××é×ÙÈÓÍÎØÚ×ÐÍÅê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÛÎØ ÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ØÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÚÛÎÑ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÊÛÓÎÉÛÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Implementation: ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÛÎØËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Timing: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ Monitoring: ïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×çéûù÷Ì×ÊÏÓÈÛÎØîíûû öÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø ûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÚ×È×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÓÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐ ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÚÃÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕÛÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÈÔÛÈÓÉÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÎÕÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÃÉÈ×ÏÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÊÓÆ×ÊÓÎ×ÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÐÍÉÉÍÖÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÔÛÚÓÈÛÈØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕèÍÙÍÏÌ×ÎÉÛÈ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×È×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÐÍÉÉÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÓÉÔÊ×ÖÇÕÓÛÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÉÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊ×ÖÇÕÓÛÚÃÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕÈÔÊ××ÌÍÍÐÊÓÖÖÐ×É×ËÇ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÎ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÐÍÕÙÊÓÚÅÛÐÐÖÍÇÊÐÍÕÒÛÏÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÊ×Û ÅÓÈÔÈÅÍÚÇÊÓ×ØÐÍÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×É óÎÈÔ×ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÍÇÐØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÈÔÛÈÔÓÎØ×ÊÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÏÏ×Ê ÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ××ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÍÖÓÎ ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÏÌÐ×ÄÓÈÃÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÙÍÆ×ÊÛÎØÌÍÍÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÛÎØÉÓÂ×ÍÖÊÓÖÖÐ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ× ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÊÓÖÖÐ×Éê×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÎØÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÍÖ×ÄÍÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÖÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É î×ÉÈÓÎÕúÓÊØÉ ûÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÚÓÊØÉÙÍÇÐØÎ×ÉÈÍÊÖÍÊÛÕ×ÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ× ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎèÛÚÐ× èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÓÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÆ×ÊÃÉÏÛÐÐÛÏÍÇÎÈ ÍÖÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÈÔ×É×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÍÙÙÛÉÓÍÎÛÐÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÏÛÃÚ× È×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÓÐÃØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×Ì×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃØÓÉÈÇÊÚ×ØÚÃØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÇÊÚÛÎÇÉ×ÈÔ× ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÔÇÏÛÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐÃ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÚÓÊØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÍÊÇÉÛÕ×ÚÃÚÓÊØÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊöÍÊÈÔ×É×Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÛÇÉ×ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÚÓÊØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÐØ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÚÓÊØÉõÓÆ×ÎÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÛÎØÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÛÚÇÎØÛÎÙ×ÍÖ ÈÔ×É×ÚÓÊØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÐÍÅÏÛÕÎÓÈÇØ×ÍÖÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÎÍÈ ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÚÓÊØÉôÍÅ×Æ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ Î×ÉÈÉ×ÕÕÉÃÍÇÎÕÍÊÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈ Impact BIO-3: èÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÊÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÍÖÉÔÊÇÚÉÛÎØÈÊ××ÉÍÎÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÙÍÇÐØÓÏÌÛÙÈ Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÊØÉÓÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 59 óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÚÓÊØÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉ ÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð Mitigation Measure BIO-3: æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÈÛÑ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃÈÍûÇÕÇÉÈ ÓÖÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÈÍ ÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÊØÉóÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊÛÌÈÍÊÎ×ÉÈÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÎÍÎ Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÇÊÆ×ÃÍÖÛÐÐÍÎÉÓÈ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÊÛÌÈÍÊÎ×ÉÈÉÉÔÛÐÐ Ú×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÚÃÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ÷Æ×ÊÃÛÈÈ×ÏÌÈÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÏÛØ×ÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ ÊÛÌÈÍÊÎ×ÉÈÉ óÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÇÎÛÆÍÓØÛÚÐ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐ ÙÍÎØÇÙÈÛÉÇÊÆ×ÃÖÍÊÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÚÓÊØÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÖÓÆ×ØÛÃÉÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÛÊÈÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉóÖÛÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÈÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÙÛÎÈÛÑ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÛÉ ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØóÖÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÖÓÆ×ØÛÃÉ×ÐÛÌÉ×Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÐÎ×ÉÈÉ×ÛÊÙÔÛÎØÈÔ×Ú×ÕÓÎÎÓÎÕÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊÎ×ÉÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØóÖÛÎÃÛÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÈÉÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×Ø ÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÈÍÚ××ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÈÔ×Î×ÉÈ ùøöõÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÙÙ×ÌÈÉÛ ÖÍÍÈÊÛØÓÇÉÚÇÖÖ×ÊÛÊÍÇÎØÌÛÉÉ×ÊÓÎ×ÛÎØÎÍÎÌÛÉÉ×ÊÓÎ×ÐÛÎØÚÓÊØ Î×ÉÈÉÛÎØÇÌÈÍÛ ÖÍÍÈÊÛØÓÇÉÖÍÊÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÔÛÆ×ÖÐ×ÄÓÚÓÐÓÈÃ ÍÊ×ÄÌÛÎØÈÔ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÙÓÊÙÇÏÉÈÛÎÙ×É Implementation: ëÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Monitoring: ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÈÍÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÎØ ÍÊÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖ Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎóÖÎÍÈÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÖÓÆ×ØÛÃÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖ Î×ÉÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉóÖÎ×ÉÈÉÛÊ×ÖÍÇÎØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÚÇÖÖ×ÊÓÉÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÇÎÈÓÐÙÔÓÙÑÉÔÛÆ× ÖÐ×ØÕ×ØèÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÏ×ÏÍÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÉÍÖ ÈÔ×Î×ÉÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ê úÛÈÉ èÔ×úÓÍÈÓÙê×ÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÊ×ÌÍÊÈÉÈÔ× ÚÊÍÅÎÚÛÈÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÇÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÓÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÈÍÐÓÑ×ÐÃÚ×ÈÔ×ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈÍÙÙÇÊÊÓÎÕ ÍÎÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃÖÐÍÍÊóÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÛÈ ÈÍ Ö×ÏÛÐ×ÉÛÎØÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÛÎØ ûÚÍÇÈ Ö×ÏÛÐ×ÉÅ×Ê×ÛÐÉÍÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÈÍÊ×ÕÇÐÛÊÐÃÎÓÕÔÈÊÍÍÉÈÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÚÊÓØÕ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÅÛÊÏÏÍÎÈÔÉÍÖÈÔ×Ã×ÛÊûÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÊÍÍÉÈÙÍÐÍÎÃÅÛÉØÓÉÙÍÆ×Ê×Ø ØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÓÎÈÔ×ÉÇÏÏ×ÊÛÎØÖÛÐÐÍÖ èÔÓÉÊÍÍÉÈÙÍÐÍÎÃÅÛÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÛÈÊ××ÓÎÈÔ× ôÍÊÉ×ÉÔÍ×ú×ÎØÛÊ×ÛÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèêû éÓÎÙ×ÈÔÓÉÈÊ××ÅÛÉÎÍÈÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎìÔÛÉ×ÓÈÓÉÏÍÉÈÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÔÛÈÈÔÓÉÚÛÈÙÍÐÍÎÃÔÓÕÔÇÌÓÎÈÔ×ÈÊ××ÓÉÉÈÓÐÐ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÎØÛÙÈÓÆ×ï×ÄÓÙÛÎÖÊ××ÈÛÓÐ×ØÛÎØãÇÏÛÏÃÍÈÓÉÚÛÈÉÔÛÆ×ÛÐÉÍÚ××ÎØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕ ÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊôèôÛÊÆ×ÃÛÎØûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×É èÔ×ÚÓÕÚÊÍÅÎÚÛÈÙÍÐÍÎÃÏÛÃÉÈÓÐÐÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÊÍÍÉÈÈÊ××ÈÔÛÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÏÓÐ× ÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÍÊÏÛÃÔÛÆ×ÏÍÆ×ØÈÍÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊÊÍÍÉÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÈÔÛÈÓÉÙÐÍÉ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×úóíÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÖÛÎÃÊÍÍÉÈÓÎÕÚÛÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÖÍÇÎØÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ Impact BIO-4: ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÊÛÚÛÎØÍÎÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÚÛÈ ÊÍÍÉÈÍÊÙÍÐÍÎÃ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÚÛÈÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉ ÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 60 Environmental Checklist Mitigation Measure BIO-4: èÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÛÉ Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÛÎØÛÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÃÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ ÛìÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÚÓÕÚÊÍÅÎÚÛÈÉÙÍÇÐØÏÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÓÊÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÙÍÐÍÎÃ ÍÊØÛÃÊÍÍÉÈÈÍÛÈÊ××ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÚÛÈÉÙÍÇÐØ ÖÍÊÏÛÎ×ÅÊÍÍÉÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÇÊÆ×ÃÖÍÊÊÍÍÉÈÓÎÕÚÛÈÉÉÔÛÐÐ ÛÐÉÍÚ×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÐÛÊÕ×ÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐèÔ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÚÃÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ Úè×ÏÌÍÊÛÐÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÂÍÎ×ÉùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÂÍÎ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ× ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÛÙÈÓÆ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÙÍÐÍÎÓ×ÉÍÊÛÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÎÍÎÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÚÛÈÊÍÍÉÈÈÍ ÛÆÍÓØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉèÔ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÅÓÐÐÚ××ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÎÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔ ùøöõÛÎØÅÓÐÐÚ×Ø×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈÇÌÍÎÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÊÍÍÉÈÈÃÌ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊ×ÍÖÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔÓÉÚÇÖÖ×ÊØÓÉÈÛÎÙ× ÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÏÏ×ÎÙ×ÍÎÐÃÛÖÈ×ÊÃÍÇÎÕÛÊ×ÆÍÐÛÎÈÖÐÃÓÎÕÛÖÈ×ÊòÇÐÃ ÛÎØ×ÎØÚ×ÖÍÊ× ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÙÍÐÍÎÓ×ÉÖÍÊÏÇÎÐ×ÉÉÍÈÔ×ÊÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ× Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÙÙ×ÌÈÛÚÐ×ÈÍùøöõÖÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÊÍÍÉÈÉùøöõÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÖÊÍÏïÛÊÙÔÈÍûÇÕÇÉÈ Implementation: ëÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ Timing: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Monitoring: ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÈÍÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÎ×ÛÊÛÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃ ÊÍÍÉÈÈÊ××ÓÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎóÖÎÍÈ ÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÛÊ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø úÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÎÕÅÍÊÑÅÍÇÐØÉÇÚÏÓÈÛÐ×ÈÈ×ÊÈÍùøöõÛÎØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÍÖÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÛÑ×ÎÛÎØÛÉ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÛÎÃÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉ çÉ×ÊûÙÙ×ÉÉÛÎØøÍÕÉ çÌÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÍÌ×ÎÈÍÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÊÉÆÓÛ ÈÔ×ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÉÍÏ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔÓÉÙÔÛÎÕ×ÓÎÇÉ× ÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎØÇ×ÈÍÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÊÉÈÊÛÆ×ÐÓÎÕÍÖÖÈÊÛÓÐ ÛÎØÈÊÛÏÌÐÓÎÕÍÊØ×ÉÈÊÍÃÓÎÕÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎûØ×ÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÆ×ÊÙÍÇÐØÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ× ÈÍÚÛÎÑ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØÓÎÙÊ×Ï×ÎÈÛÐÐÃÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×É×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÊÇÎÍÖÖ×ÎÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑØÇÊÓÎÕ ÈÔ×ÊÛÓÎÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÅÔÓÙÔÙÍÇÐØÓÎÈÇÊÎÛÖÖ×ÙÈÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÎØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÛËÇÛÈÓÙÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× öÇÊÈÔ×ÊÏÍÊ×ÛËÇÛÈÓÙÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÏÛÃÚ×ÏÍÊ×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÇÉ×ÊÉÏÍÆÓÎÕÍÖÖÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÓÖÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×ÈÍÍÙÙÇÊìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊ ÈÔ×ÉÌÊ×ÛØÍÖÎÍÄÓÍÇÉÅ××ØÉÏÛÃÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÇÉ×ÊÉÛÐÍÎÕÛÈÊÛÓÐé××ØÉÙÛÎÚ× ÙÛÊÊÓ×ØÍÎÙÐÍÈÔÓÎÕÛÎØ ÍÊÉÔÍ×ÉÛÎØÚ×ÙÍÏ×ØÓÉÐÍØÕ×ØÅÔÓÐ×ÅÛÐÑÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ûÎÍÈÔ×ÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÈÍÅÛÐÑÈÔ× ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÓÈÔÐ×ÛÉÔ×ØØÍÕÉóÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÊÍÏÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØØÍÕÇÉ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÍÕ ÅÛÉÈ×ÎÍÈÚ×ÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÐÃØÓÉÌÍÉ×ØÍÖÛÎØÛÔÓÕÔ×ÊÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖØÍÕÅÛÉÈ×ÛÐÍÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉ ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×ÛÙÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖØÍÕÅÛÉÈ×ÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØØ×ÕÊÛØÛÈÓÍÎ ËÇÛÐÓÈÃíÖÖÐ×ÛÉÔØÍÕÉÙÍÇÐØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÚÃÙÔÛÉÓÎÕÚÓÈÓÎÕÚÛÊÑÓÎÕØÓÕÕÓÎÕ ÛÎØ ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×ÔÛÊÛÉÉÓÎÕÛÎØÓÎÒÇÊÓÎÕÛÎÓÏÛÐÉíÖÖÐ×ÛÉÔØÍÕÉÙÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔØÓÕÕÓÎÕÇÌÛÎØ ÍÊÈÊÛÏÌÐÓÎÕÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎíÖÖÐ×ÛÉÔØÍÕÉÙÍÇÐØÕÍÓÎÈÔ× ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÓÎÕÛËÇÛÈÓÙÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÕÊÛÆ×ÐÉÏÓÙÊÍÍÊÕÛÎÓÉÏÉ ÛÎØ ÍÊÙÍÇÐØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÉ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 61 èÍÍÖÖÉ×ÈÈÔ×É×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÇÉ×ÊÛÎØØÍÕÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÐÓÉÈ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÓÎÌÐÛÙ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÈÊÛÓÐÚÇÓÐÈÓÎìÔÛÉ×ÅÓÐÐÚ× ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ìÍÉÈÉÓÕÎÉèÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÌÍÉÈÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÍÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÈÍÓÎÖÍÊÏÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÍÉÈÛÃÍÎÈÔ× ÈÊÛÓÐÙÐ×ÛÎÇÌØÍÕÅÛÉÈ×ÛÎØÍÚ×ÃÐ×ÛÉÔÐÛÅÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ìÛÈÊÍÐÉèÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉ×ØÊÛÎÕ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÌÛÈÊÍÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÈÍ Ô×ÐÌ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×Ð×ÛÉÔÐÛÅÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÛÎØ×ØÇÙÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ùÊ××ÑçÉ×ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉÇÙÔÛÉÅÛØÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ× ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ìÛÊÑùÐ×ÛÎÇÌêÛÎÕ×ÊÉÈÛÖÖÌÛÊÑÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÙÊ×ÅÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊùÓÈÃ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÉÛÉ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎéÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊÛÎØ ÍÊÈÔ×ìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈÅÓÐÐÙÐ×ÛÎÇÌ ÛÙÙÇÏÇÐÛÈ×ØØÍÕÅÛÉÈ×ÖÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛøÍÕÅÛÉÈ×ÌÓÙÑÇÌÚÛÕÉÅÓÐÐÚ× ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÖÍÊÇÉ×ÚÃÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÈÔÛÈÅÛÐÑÈÔ×ÓÊØÍÕÉÍÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ûØÛÌÈÓÆ×ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈóÖÓÈÓÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔÛÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÐÃ ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂÓÎÕÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÈÔ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÖÐÍÊÛÛÎØÖÛÇÎÛÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÏÛÃ ØÓÉÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕØÍÕÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛóÖØ×ÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÉÇÊÆÓÆÍÊÉÔÓÌ ÍÊØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÈÍÍÈÔ×ÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÓÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÖÊÍÏÆÓÉÓÈÍÊ ÏÓÉÇÉ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÉÇÙÔÛÉÙÐÍÉÓÎÕÍÊÖ×ÎÙÓÎÕÍÖÖ ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÈÍÛÆÍÓØÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ èÔ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ× ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÆ×ÊÍÎ×ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÎ×ÅÎÛÈÓÆ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÛÎØÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉèÔÓÉÎ×Å ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×Ê×ÖÇÕ×ÛÎØÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÖ×ÄÌÛÎØ×ØÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÛÎØÎ×ÅØÍÕÇÉ×ÅÓÐÐÚ× ÛÆÍÓØ×ØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉÚÃÈÔÓÉÎ×ÅÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ×ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÓÎÌÐÛÙ×ÖÍÊéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖìÔÛÉ×ÎÍÈ×Ø ÛÚÍÆ× éÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉìÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ûÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ×ØÓÎèÛÚÐ× ÛÎØØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÍÎÐÃÍÎ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉ ÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÐ×ÛÈÔ×ÊÅÍÍØûÉ ÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÔÛÉÎ×Æ×ÊÚ××ÎÖÍÇÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÎÍÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÈÔÓÉÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐ ÉÈÛÈÇÉÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÊ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×Ø èÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÐÍÎÕ×ÊÈ×ÊÏÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÕÍÛÐÉÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊ ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉóÖÓÈÓÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÕÍÛÐÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÚ×ÓÎÕÊ×ÛÙÔ×ØÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÏÛØ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÈÍÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ× ÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÉÓ×ÛØÛÌÈÓÆ×ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? èÊ××ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ Less Than Significant Impact. ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄøÓÉÛÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÎÈÖÍÊÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÈÊÛÓÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎØ×ÈÛÓÐÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÃ×ÈØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔ× Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÛÊ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎöÓÎÛÐØ×ÉÓÕÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐ ÉÈÊÓÆ×ÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÛÐÐÈÊ××ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÎÈ×ÎØÉÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÈÅÍÊÍÅÉÍÖ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 62 Environmental Checklist ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÛÉÛÚÇÖÖ×ÊÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÎØÛÐÉÍÛÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕ ÂÍÎ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÐÍÎÕÏÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØ×ØÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊ ÌÛÊÙ×ÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÛÊ×ÛèÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÆÛÊÓÛÚÐ×ÓÎÅÓØÈÔ ÅÓÈÔÐÓÑ×ÐÃÎÛÊÊÍÅ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÉÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÖÍÍÈÌÛÈÔÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×óÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÊ××É ÛÉÎÍÈ×ØÓÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÍÖÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÖÖÍÊÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÏÛØ×ÈÍÉÓÈ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÛÎÃÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ØÊÓÌÐÓÎ×ûÎÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈ Ù×ÊÈÓÖÓ×ØÚÃ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐéÍÙÓ×ÈÃÍÖûÊÚÍÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊ×óéûÍÊÈÔ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ùÍÎÉÇÐÈÓÎÕûÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÉûéùûÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÈÊ××ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÅÍÇÐØÇÉ××ÓÈÔ×Ê éÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎøÇÊÓÎÕùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÛÊ éÈÊ×ÛÏÉÚÃÈÔ×åÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ×ÖÍÊéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÚÃî×ÐØÛïÛÈÔ×ÎÃÛÎØòÛÏ×ÉùÐÛÊÑÍÊÛÙÍÏÚÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×É×ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÊ××ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÔ×ÐÌ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ ÎÍÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØ ÍÙÙÇÊ ôÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÃÌ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÉÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÂ×ØÚÃéÛÅÃ×ÊÛÎØñ××Ð×Ê åÍÐÖÛÊ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÍÊÙÔÛÊØÛÎØÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÕÊÛÉÉÐÛÎØ íÖÈÔ×É×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÚÃùøöõ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÏÍÆ× ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÅÍÙÓÈÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÍÎ×ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÛÎØÍÎ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ùÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÈÊ××ÉÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖ ÈÔ×É×ÈÊ××ÉÓÉÖÍÇÎØÓÎÈÔ×ÛÎÉÅ×ÊÖÍÊËÇ×ÉÈÓÍÎ×Ú×ÐÍÅïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×úóíÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÎÃ ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ùøöõÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÛÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØ ÆÛÐÇ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔÓÉÊ×ÛÙÔÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ× ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ~ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÈÈÔ×ÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØÇÌÌ×ÊÚÛÎÑÉÛÎØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛÙÊ×ÍÖ ÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÊÃÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ××ØÕ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈûÉÉÈÛÈ×Ø ÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÊÍÙÑÊÓÌÊÛÌÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÔÛÊØÉÙÛÌ× ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÏÇÙÔÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÛÉÅÍÇÐØÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú×ÙÍÏ× ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÎÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÊ×ÛÉèÔÓÉÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÎÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÏÍÊ×ÛÊ×ÛÈÍÚ××ÎÔÛÎÙ×ØÛÎØ Ê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈ×ØÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈ éÇØØ×ÎíÛÑø×ÛÈÔéíø èÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÍÖéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛÔÛÉÙÍÎÖÓÊÏ×ØÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖéÇØØ×ÎíÛÑø×ÛÈÔéíøÛ Phytophthora ramorum ÆÓÊÇÐ×ÎÈÈÊ××ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÙÛÇÉ×ØÚÃèÔÓÉÌÛÈÔÍÕ×ÎÈÔÊÓÆ×ÉÓÎÏÍÓÉÈÙÍÛÉÈÛÐ ÖÍÊ×ÉÈÉèÔÓÉØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÔÛÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈ×ØÓÎÅÓØ×ÉÌÊ×ÛØØÓ×ÚÛÙÑÍÖÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ùÍÇÎÈÃÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÛÎÍÛÑÉÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÉÛÎØÚÐÛÙÑÍÛÑÉèÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃÐÛÇÊ×ÐÈÊ××ÓÉ Ú×ÐÓ×Æ×ØÈÍÔÍÉÈÈÔ×ÌÛÈÔÍÕ×ÎèÔ×ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÓÉÎÍÈÑÎÍÅÎÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÍÛØÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÔÛÉÚ××Î ÙÍÎÖÓÊÏ×ØÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÊ×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÅÓÈÔÓÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÇÎÈÃìÛÊÑÛÎØÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐ ïÓØÌ×ÎÓÎÉÇÐÛê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐíÌ×ÎéÌÛÙ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÉÅÅÅÍÛÑÏÛÌÌ×ÊÍÊÕùÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÉ ÛÎØùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃÐÛÇÊ×ÐÉÛÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×Û Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ØÖÍÊéíøÚÃÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛúÍÛÊØÍÖöÍÊ×ÉÈÊÃÛÎØöÓÊ×ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÎÃÎ×ÅÈÊ××ÉÅÓÈÔ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 63 ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÚ×ÓÎÖ×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÈÔéíøÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÚÊÍÇÕÔÈÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÖÍÊÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÓÎÕØÓÉ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× Impact BIO-5: ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÙÛÊÊÃÓÎÖ×ÙÈ×ØÉÍÓÐÖÊÍÏÍÈÔ×Ê ÉÓÈ×ÉÓÎÈÍÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÈÔ×ÇÎÓÎÈ×ÎØ×Ø ÍÖÔÍÉÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÈÍÍÊÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×Ø Mitigation Measure BIO-5 èÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÈÔ×ÉÌÊ×ÛØÍÖéÇØØ×ÎíÛÑø×ÛÈÔÖÊÍÏÉÍÓÐÛÎØ ÌÐÛÎÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛØÛÌÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛíÛÑïÍÊÈÛÐÓÈÃèÛÉÑöÍÊÙ× ùÍÎØÇÙÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ØÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÓÖÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×Å×ÈÉÍÓÐÏÇØÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛØÔ×ÊÓÎÕÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×É×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÚÍÍÈÉ ùÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛÎØ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÊÊÓÆÓÎÕÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÖÊÍÏ ÛÊ×ÛÉÅÔ×Ê×éíø×ÄÓÉÈÉÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÎÍÔÍÉÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÓÉÚ×ÓÎÕÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ× ÉÓÈ× ùÐ×ÛÎÏÇØÖÊÍÏÉÔÍ×ÉÚÍÍÈÉÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÛÎØÔ×ÛÆÃ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÊÊÓÆÓÎÕÖÊÍÏéíøÛÊ×ÛÉ ÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÊÊÓÆÛÐÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× Implementation: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Beneficial Effect. úÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÈÐÛÎØØ×ÐÓÎ×ÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÅÛÉÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÊ×ÆÓ×Å×ØÚÃÈÔ×çéûù÷ÓÎîÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÊ×ÛÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÉËÇÛÊ×Ö××È ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ Å×ÈÐÛÎØØÍÏÓÎÛÈ×ØÚÃÚÇÐÊÇÉÔÛÎØÅÓÐÐÍÅÐ×ÛÆ×ØØÍÙÑ ûÉØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÓÎËÇ×ÉÈÓÍÎÛÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÎ××ØÈÍÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×çéûù÷ÛÎØ ùøöõÖÍÊÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÈÍÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÐÐÚ× ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×É×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉèÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆÓÎÕÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÆÛÐÇ×ÉÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÊ×Û ÛèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÙÍÚÚÐ×ÛÎØ ÍÊÕÊÛÆ×ÐÚÛÊÉÛÎØ ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÉÇÚÉÈÊÛÈ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ Å×ÈÐÛÎØÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÚÛÎÑÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÚûÎÃÎÛÈÓÆ×ÚÛÎÑÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÓÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÍÊÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÆÛÐÇ×ÉÈÍÈÔ× É×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÚÛÎÑÓÏÌÛÙÈ×Ø ÙèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÅÓØÈÔÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÎØÛÓÏÉ ÈÍÊ×ÈÛÓÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÍÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÈÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×èÔ×É×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÈÍÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑÉÛÎØÈÔ× ÇÌÌ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎ ØúÛÎÑÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÆÛÐÇ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ× Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÎØÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÍÖ×ÄÍÈÓÙÌÐÛÎÈÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 64 Environmental Checklist ×èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÎ×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××ÈÐÍÎÕÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ËÇÛÎÈÓÈÃÍÖÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ùÍÏÌ×ÎÉÛÈÍÊÃÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×çéûù÷ÖÍÊÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂ×ØÇÎØ×Ê Ù×ÊÈÛÓÎÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÈÔ×ÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂ×ØÅÍÊÑÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎÛÎ×ÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÛËÇÛÈÓÙ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÆÛÐÇ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛèÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÙÍÇÌÐ×ØÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÌÐÛÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÉÛÎØÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÉ ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØÚÃÈÔ×Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÖÍÊÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎ×È ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÛËÇÛÈÓÙÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÆÛÐÇ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Beneficial Effect. èÍÛÆÍÓØÛÎÃÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÅÓÎØÍÅÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Øîíûû öÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÉÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÎÕÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÚÃÊ×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÈÍÚ× ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃîÍÆ×ÏÚ×ÊÈÍòÇÎ×ÍÖÛÎÃÕÓÆ×ÎÃ×ÛÊ óÖÖÍÊÛÎÃÊ×ÛÉÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÇÎÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛØÔ×Ê×ÈÍÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÃîíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×úÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐíÌÓÎÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×ØÊ×ØÇÙÓÎÕ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉ íÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÕÍÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ã×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÌÛÉÉÛÕ×ÖÍÊÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÓÎÛÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÇÈÍÖÖÛÎÃÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÍÊÓÎÔÓÚÓÈ ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÈ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊçÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ê×ÛÙÔéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÚÍÊØ×Ê×ØÚÃÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÛÎØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎ êÛÎÙÔÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÇÎÈÃìÛÊÑÅÔ×Ê×ÛÉØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÛÙÔÈÔ× ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÓÉÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÉ×ÈÚÛÙÑÉÛÊ×ÏÓÎÓÏÛÐåÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÇÙÔÛÉ ÚÐÛÙÑÈÛÓÐ×ØÏÇÐ×Ø××ÊÚÍÚÙÛÈÙÍÃÍÈ×ÉÑÇÎÑÊÛÙÙÍÍÎÛÊ×ÑÎÍÅÎÈÍÇÈÓÐÓÂ×ÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊçÊÚÛÎÛØÛÌÈ×ØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÊÛÙÙÍÍÎÛÊ×ÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÛÐÉÍÇÉ×ÛÊ×ÛÉØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÛÙÔè×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÖ×ÎÙÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÚ××Ê×ÙÈ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÂÍÎ×ÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÍÌ×ÎÛÊ×ÛÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÂÍÎ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÉÈÓÐÐ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÖÍÊÈ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÚÍÈÔÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÎØØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÆÛÐÇ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÉÛÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× èÔ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÍÊ È×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ËÇÛÎÈÓÈÃÛÎØËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÖÎÛÈÓÆ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ× ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎóÈÓÉÖÍÊÈÔ×É×Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉÈÔ×ÎÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. é×Æ×ÊÛÐÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÛÎÈÛ ùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÎØùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ÔÛÆ× ÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐøÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×É×ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÓÉÚ×ÐÍÅ ùÊ××Ñê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØèÊ××ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ California Department of Fish and Game ùøöõÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÈÔÛÈÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛÉ×ÈÊÛÈÓÍöÍÊ ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÛÎÃÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÈÍÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÈÍ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 65 ÊÛÈÓÍ ÈÊ××ÉÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØêÛÈÓÍÉÆÛÊÃØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÔ×É× ÊÛÈÓÍÉÔÛÆ×Ú××Î×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÙÍÏÌ×ÎÉÛÈ×ÖÍÊÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÏÍÊÈÛÐÓÈÃÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ ÈÊ××ÉÛÎØÈÍ×ÄÌ×ØÓÈ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ Consistency íÎ×ÙÓÈÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØØÇ×ÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×úóíÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÐÐ ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ùøöõÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍ City of Cupertino èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÊ××íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆ×Ô×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÓÎÈÔÓÉÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÖÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÍÛÑùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃÅ×ÉÈ×ÊÎÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÚÓÕÐ×ÛÖÏÛÌÐ×Ø×ÍØÛÊÙ×ØÛÊÛÎØÚÐÇ×ÛÈÐÛÉÙ×ØÛÊ ÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÍÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÈÔ×ÉÓÎÕÐ×ÈÊÇÎÑØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛØ×øÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈúÊ×ÛÉÈô×ÓÕÔÈÍÊøúôÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉÅÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×ÏÇÐÈÓÈÊÇÎÑØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛØ×øúôÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÊ××ÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÍÊÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÉÛÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÊ×× Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÌÊÓÆÛÙÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÛÎêÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈô×ÊÓÈÛÕ× ÈÊ××ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÊ××ÍÊÕÊÍÆ×ÍÖÈÊ××ÉÅÔÓÙÔÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÖÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍ ÓÈÉÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÆÛÐÇ×ÇÎÓËÇ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÕÓÊÈÔÔ×ÓÕÔÈÍÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÔÛÉÚ××ÎÖÍÇÎØÚÃÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÈÍÔÛÆ×ÛÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ èÔ×ÎÍÊÏÛÐÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÓÉÍÎ×Î×Å ÓÎÙÔÚÍÄÈÊ××ÖÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÛ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÇÌÈÍ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉøúôèÔ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÓÉÈÅÍ ÓÎÙÔÚÍÄÈÊ××ÉÖÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÍÖÛÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ×× ÈÍÓÎÙÔ×ÉøúôÈÅÍ ÓÎÙÔÚÍÄÈÊ××ÉÍÊÍÎ× ÓÎÙÔÚÍÄÈÊ××ÖÍÊ Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÛÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÈÍ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉøúôÛÎØÍÎ× ÓÎÙÔÚÍÄÈÊ××ÖÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÛ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÍÆ×Ê ÓÎÙÔ×Éøúô îÍÔ×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÉÈÍ Ê×ÏÍÆ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÅÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÍÎ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÛÎØÍÎ×ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑ Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÛÊÈ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÛÙÈÇÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÈÊ××ÉÈÍÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÅÍÇÐØØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÉÓÂ× ÛÎØËÇÛÎÈÓÈÃÍÖÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÔ×Ê× ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÓÎÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×ÅÐÃ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÊ×ÛÙÔ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÛÊ×ÛÉÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÔÓÉÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÓÉ ÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÛÐÐÍÈÔ×ÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉØÇ×ÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ØÚÃÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎï×ÛÉÇÊ×úóíÛÎØÚÃ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÖÊÍÏùÓÈÃíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ùÔÛÌÈ×ÊûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ÖÍÊÈÔ×ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖèÊ××ÉØÇÊÓÎÕõÊÛØÓÎÕÛÎØùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎíÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÊ××íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÈÊ××ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÉÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÚÃÛÎÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÛÎØ Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×Ø×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×Ô×Ê×ÓÎ Consistency ûÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÅÓÐÐÚ×ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÎØÍÎÖÓÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÎØÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕ ÌÐÛÎÈÔÇÉ×ÎÉÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙÃ Impact BIO-6: èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÏÛÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÊÍÍÈÂÍÎ×ÉÍÖÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÓÖÓÈÓÉÌÐÛÙ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ØÊÓÌÐÓÎ×ÍÖÛÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ×× Mitigation Measure BIO-6: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈ Ù×ÊÈÓÖÓ×ØÚÃ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐéÍÙÓ×ÈÃÍÖûÊÚÍÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊ×óéûÍÊÈÔ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ùÍÎÉÇÐÈÓÎÕûÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÉûéùûÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈÊ××ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 66 Environmental Checklist ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÅÍÇÐØÇÉ×ÈÔ×éÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖ ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎøÇÊÓÎÕùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÛÊéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÚÃÈÔ× åÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ×ÖÍÊéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÍÊèÊ××ÉÛÎØø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÚÃ î×ÐØÛïÛÈÔ×ÎÃÛÎØòÛÏ×ÉùÐÛÊÑÍÊÛÙÍÏÚÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×É×ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÊÍÍÈÂÍÎ×ÉÍÖÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û Implementation: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐØ×ÉÓÕÎ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ Impact BIO-7: èÊ××ÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÐØÆÓÍÐÛÈ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÎØùøöõ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××É óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉ ÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð Mitigation Measure BIO-7: èÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ× ÈÔÛÈÎÍÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÛèÍÉÛÈÓÉÖÃÈÔ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖùøöõÛÐÐÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÊÛÈÓÍ ÈÊ××ÉÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØèÔ×É× ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÈÍÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×íÛÑÈÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÇÉÓÎÕØÓÊ×ÙÈÉ××Ø×ØÛÙÍÊÎÉÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑåÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÖÊÍÏ ÛÉÙÐÍÉ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× ÚóÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÔ×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××É ÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÈÍÚ×ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÈÊ×× Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø ÙìÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊðÛÎØçÉ× Î×ÛÊéÈÊ×ÛÏÉéùæåêìù ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕÎ×ÛÊ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÍÖðÍÙÛÐÐÃîÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎØÍÖíÊÎÛÏ×ÎÈÛÐÍÊ îÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎ Implementation: ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÅÍÇÐØÛÌÌÐÃÖÍÊÛÎØÍÚÈÛÓÎÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÅÍÇÐØ Ê×ÏÍÆ×ÈÊ××É Timing: ûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÍÊÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐèÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÊÛÈÓÍÉÛÉÛÌÛÊÈÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É Monitoring: ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÈÍÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉ×ÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊùÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÑ××Ì Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÓÐ× ê×ÐÛÈ×ØìÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ Policy 5-8 ìÇÚÐÓÙìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕ÷ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÎØËÇÛÉÓÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÍ ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ÈÔ×ÓÊÙÓÈÃÛÊ×ÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÎ×ÛÊÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØ ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÎÍÎÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉ Policy 5-10 ðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕî×ÛÊîÛÈÇÊÛÐæ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ÷ÏÌÔÛÉÓÂ×ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÛÎØÌ×ÉÈ Ê×ÉÓÉÈÛÎÈÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎØÎÍÎÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÕÊÍÇÎØÙÍÆ×ÊÉÅÔ×Î ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÎ×ÛÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐÃÖÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÍÖ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÖÊÍÏ ØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 67 Policy 5-11 îÛÈÇÊÛÐûÊ×ÛìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎìÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÛÎØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÅÔ×ÎÎ×ÅØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Policy 5-13 ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÓÎîÛÈÇÊÛÐûÊ×ÛÉðÓÏÓÈÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÈÍÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÅÓÈÔÌÊ×É×ÊÆÓÎÕÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÔÓÑÓÎÕÔÍÊÉ×ÚÛÙÑÊÓØÓÎÕÏÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÚÓÑÓÎÕÛÎØ ÙÛÏÌÓÎÕ Policy 5-14 ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØåÓÐØÐÓÖ×èÊÛÓÐÉìÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎØÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÚÍÈÔÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÏÍÉÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐÃÖÍÊÈÔ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÈÍÖÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÈÔÛÈÓÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÍÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ Consistency ûÐÐÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎØÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÊØÉÙÛÌ× Ú×ÓÎÕÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÎØÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÚÃÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÛÎØÏÍÊ× ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÉÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ× Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÈÍÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÓÈÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Øú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×É úïìÉúïì ê×ÌÐÛÙ×èÊ××ÉÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÔÛÐÐÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÈÊ××ÉÛÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ îÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÍÉÈÈÍÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÊÛÈÓÍÛÎØ ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÍÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÊÛÈÓÍ èÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÈÔ× Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÍÊÛÈÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÛÈÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃ èÔ×ìÐÛÎÈé×Ð×ÙÈÓÍÎùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛìÐÛÎÈÓÎÕè×ÙÔÎÓËÇ×ÉïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÉÌÊ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ìÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÖÍÊê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔúÛÎÑìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÛÉÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÍÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈðÍÙÛÐ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÕÊÍÅÎÖÊÍÏÍÎÉÓÈ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊ×Ö×ÊÛÚÐ×ÈÍÐÛÊÕ×ÊÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ÊÕÊÍÅÎÉÈÍÙÑÅÓÈÔÓÉ ÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÐ ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÔ×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÉÓÂ×ØÈÊ××ÉÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÓÎÙÔ×ÉøúôÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×É ûÐÐÈÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ×× ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÚÃØÓÊ×ÙÈÉ××ØÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÛÙÍÊÎÉÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø Consistency óÈÓÉÔÓÕÔÐÃÇÎÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÔÛÈÛÎÃÈÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÐÍÉÈÈÍÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÕÓÆ×ÎÈÔÛÈÎÍÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÊÓÌÊÛÌÛÎØ ÔÛÊØÉÙÛÌ×ØÚÛÎÑÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÈÊ××Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ æÛÊÓÍÇÉÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÉÍÏ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈì×ÊûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄøÍÎ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÛÎØÍÎ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑ ÈÊ××ÏÛÃÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈ ÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÚÛÎÑÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÃÐÍÙÛÐÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 68 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛùÛÇÉ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÓÎÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÛÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÓÎ ÚùÛÇÉ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÓÎÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÎÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍ ÙøÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÍÊÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃØ×ÉÈÊÍÃÛ ÇÎÓËÇ×ÌÛÐ×ÍÎÈÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÍÊÉÓÈ× ÍÊÇÎÓËÇ×Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ý ØøÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÃÔÇÏÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔÍÉ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÊ×ØÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖ ÖÍÊÏÛÐÙ×Ï×È×ÊÓ×Éý èÔ×È×ÄÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÈÔ×É×ÈÈÓÎÕÛÎØÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÉ ÈÔ×ùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑïÛÉÈ×Ê ìÐÛÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÚÃúÛÉÓÎê×É×ÛÊÙÔûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×É É××ÖÇÐÐÊ×ÌÍÊÈÓÎûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄúûÉÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÚÍÈÔÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÛÎØÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÔÛÆ×ÎÍÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ØÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔÓÉÊ×ÌÍÊÈÅÛÉÌÇÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÈÔÓÉ Ê×ÌÍÊÈÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÛÊ×ÉÈÓÐÐÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× Regulatory Setting èÔ×Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑÈÔÛÈÏÛÎØÛÈ×ÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÓÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ÛÎØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÉÓÈ×ÉØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÛÎØÍÚÒ×ÙÈÉÉÈÛÎØÓÎÕÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉ ØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÛÎØÍÚÒ×ÙÈÉÛÎØÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ×Æ×ÎÈÉÍÊÉÓÈ×ÉÍÖÈÊÛØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØ ÍÊ ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÙ×ÈÍÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÕÊÍÇÌÉùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÍÊ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÎÈ×ÊÏÉÍÖÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÍÊÐÍÙÛÐÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÐÃÍÊÓÎ ÙÍÏÚÓÎÛÈÓÍÎê×ÉÍÇÊÙ××ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÊ×Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÛ ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐëÇÛÐÓÈÃûÙÈ èÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐëÇÛÐÓÈÃûÙÈù÷ëûÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÉÓÈ×ÉÍÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÍÛÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÍÊ×ÈÔÎÓÙÕÊÍÇÌ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÓÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÖ ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùêôêèÔ×ùêôêé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÓÉÛÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÖÈÔÍÉ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ× ÈÍÚ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÛÎØÓÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÍÊ ÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÃØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ××ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×îêôìéÈÛÈ× ÛÎØ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ìÍÓÎÈÉÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐóÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈûÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÏÛÃÚ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ùêôêÓÖÓÈ Ï××ÈÉÍÎ×ÍÊÏÍÊ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÓÈÓÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔ×Æ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×ÏÛØ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÚÊÍÛØ ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÉÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÍÊÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÍÊÈÔ×ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÔ×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÍÊÈÔ×çÎÓÈ×Ø éÈÛÈ×É City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 69 ÓÈ×ÏÚÍØÓ×ÉÈÔ×ØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈÓÆ×ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÍÖÛÈÃÌ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÊ×ÕÓÍÎÍÊÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÍÖÛÏÛÉÈ×ÊÍÊÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉ×ÉÔÓÕÔÛÊÈÓÉÈÓÙÆÛÐÇ×ÉÍÊ ÓÈÔÛÉÃÓ×ÐØ×ØÍÊÔÛÉÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÃÓ×ÐØÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÍÊ ÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÍÖÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÛÊ×ÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÍÊÈÔ×ÎÛÈÓÍÎ ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÇÚÐÓÙê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍØ×ìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÉÈÓÌÇÐÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÎÃÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÍÊ ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×ùêôêÓÉÌÊ×ÉÇÏ×ØÈÍÚ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÛÐÍÙÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÊ×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÊØ××Ï×ØÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÎÛÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÛÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø ÇÎØ×Êìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÕÛÊ×ÌÊ×ÉÇÏ×ØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÇÎÐ×ÉÉÈÔ× ÌÊ×ÌÍÎØ×ÊÛÎÙ×ÍÖ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÎÍÈûÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÈÔÛÈÓÉÎÍÈÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÍÊ Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ××ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×ùêôêÎÍÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÛÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÊÎÍÈØ××Ï×ØÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÎÛÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÏÛÃÎÍÎ×ÈÔ×Ð×ÉÉÚ× ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ èÔÓÉÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÕÓÆ×ÈÔ× ØÓÉÙÊ×ÈÓÍÎÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ××ÄÓÉÈÉÅÔ×Ê×ÎÍÎ×ÔÛØÚ××Î ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÛÎØÈÍÛÌÌÐÃÈÔ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÍÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ× ÎÍÈÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÚ××ÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÃÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ØÛÉÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ù÷ëû×ËÇÛÈ×ÉÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÅÓÈÔÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØØ×ÖÓÎ×ÉÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ ÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÛÉØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎØ×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÛÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÓÏÌÛÓÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É åÔ×Ê×ÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÃÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÛÇÎÓËÇ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÈÔ×ð×ÛØûÕ×ÎÙÃÈÍÈÊ×ÛÈÈÔÛÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÛÉÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈ åÔ×ÎÛÎÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÓÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÍÊÓÉ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÈÍÚ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ùêôêìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÎÃÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×Ú×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈìêùé×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ÓÎØ×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈÐÃÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ÷ÓÈÔ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×É×Ú×ÎÙÔÏÛÊÑÉÏÛÃÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÃÔÛÆ×ÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ× ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É Other California Laws and Regulations íÈÔ×ÊÉÈÛÈ×Ð×Æ×ÐÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÛÌÌ×ÛÊÓÎÈÔ× ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛìêùùÔÛÌÈ×Êé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ìÛÐ×ÍÎÈÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÛÎØôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ ÛÎØùÔÛÌÈ×ÊÚ×ÕÓÎÎÓÎÕÛÈé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÛÎØ éÛÙÊ×ØÖÍÊÐÛÎØÉÍÅÎ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈ×ÍÊÛÉÈÛÈ×ÛÕ×ÎÙÃ èÔ×ØÓÉÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÍÖîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÚÇÊÓÛÐÉÓÉÕÍÆ×ÊÎ×ØÚÃé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÈÔ× ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛô×ÛÐÈÔÛÎØéÛÖ×ÈÃùÍØ×ÛÎØÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÍÖÈÔ×ìêùÛÎØÖÛÐÐÉ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×îûôù ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ×ðÛÎØçÉ×÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ ÔÛÉÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÈÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÐÃÛÎØÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÉÓÈ×ÉÛÎØÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉèÔ×É×ÛÊ× Policy 2-62B: Commemorative Sites. ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÍÎùÍÏÏ×ÏÍÊÛÈÓÆ×éÓÈ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×Û ÌÐÛËÇ×Ê×ÛØ×ÊÚÍÛÊØÛÎØ ÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê×ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÈÍÍÐÍÎÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÈÍ×ÄÌÐÛÓÎÈÔ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 70 Environmental Checklist ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×èÔ×ÌÐÛËÇ×ÉÔÛÐÐÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÔ×ÙÓÈÃÉ×ÛÐÎÛÏ×ÍÖÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ØÛÈ×ÓÈ ÅÛÉÚÇÓÐÈÛÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÛÎØÌÔÍÈÍÕÊÛÌÔÛÎØÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÓÎÛÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙÙÛÎÆÓ×ÅÈÔ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎöÍÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÍÎÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÎØËÇÛÉÓÌÇÚÐÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈ×ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÅÎ×ÊÈÍÛÐÐÍÅÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÉÓÈ×ÈÍÖÍÉÈ×ÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÅÛÊ×Î×ÉÉÛÎØ ÌÊÍÆÓØ××ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É Policy 2-63: Archaeologically Sensitive Areas. ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÐÃÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÛÊ×ÛÉ Strategy: Development Investigation. ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÛÎÓÎÆ×ÉÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÚ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÐÃÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÐÍÎÕÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÍÇÊÉ×ÉÛÎØÓÎÍÛÑÕÊÍÆ×ÉÈÍ Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈûÐÉÍÊ×ËÇÓÊ× ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØ×ÉÓÕÎ Policy 2-64: Native American Burials. ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÚÇÊÓÛÐÉÓÈ×É Environmental Setting öÓÎØÓÎÕÉ Record Search Results íÎ×ÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÓÈ×ÅÛÉÊ×ÙÍÊØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÛÉÛÆÓÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃ×ÛÊÈÔ îÍÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ×ÊÛÉÓÈ×ÉÅ×Ê×Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÍÊÊ×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈíÎ×ÉÓÈ×ÈÔ× úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏéÓÈ×ÔÛÉÚ××ÎÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÃÎÍÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× óÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎéÃÉÈ×ÏîÍÊÈÔÅ×ÉÈóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎù×ÎÈ×Êùôêóé îåóùùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ÈÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÏÛÌîÍÑÎÍÅÎ×ÈÔÎÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÍÊÙÍÎÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÆÓÐÐÛÕ×ÉÑÎÍÅÎÈÊÛÓÐÉÉÛÙÊ×ØÌÐÛÙ×ÉÈÊÛØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÊÙÍÎÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÇÉ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÔÛÆ×Ú××Î ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ûÌÐÛËÇ×ÛÈïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÛÚÍÇÈ ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÇÈÔÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÉÈÛÈ×ÉùÍÐÍÎ×Ð òÇÛÎúÛÇÈÓÉÈÛØ×ûÎÂÛÛÎØÌÛÊÈÃÙÊÍÉÉ×ØÈÔÓÉÛÊîÍÍÈÔ×ÊôÓÉÌÛÎÓÙ×ÊÛÊÛÎÙÔØÅ×ÐÐÓÎÕÉÍÊ Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÊ×É×ÛÊÙÔÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÖÍÊ ÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ÷ÊÛÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÃÊ×ÙÍÊØ×ØÍÊÊ×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÓÎÍÊ ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈíÎ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ×ÊÛÉÓÈ×öÛÊÏÔÛÉÚ××ÎÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÃ Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÚÃùôêóé îåóù îÍùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùêôêÍÊîÛÈÓÍÎÛÐê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ìÐÛÙ×ÉîêôìÐÓÉÈ×ØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÍÊÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛíÎ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛìÍÓÎÈÍÖóÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈÓÉÌÊ×É×ÎÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØÖÓÆ× ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÍÊÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÐÓÉÈ×Ø×ÓÈÔ×ÊÍÎÆÛÊÓÍÇÉéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃô×ÊÓÈÛÕ× ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×óÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÓ×ÉÛÎØ ÍÊÛÊ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÛÉùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÍÊùÍÏÏ×ÏÍÊÛÈÓÆ× éÓÈ×ÉÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ× õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎèÔ×É×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏéÓÈ×ÍÖ÷ÐÓÉÔÛ ÔÍÏ×ÉÈ×ÛØðÍÇÓÉéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÔÍÏ×øÍÃÐ×ÅÓÎ×ÊÃÉÓÈ×ÖÍÇÎØÛÈÓÍÎïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ îÛÈÇÊ×ìÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÊ×ÌÐÓÙÛÚÐÛÙÑÉÏÓÈÔÉÔÍÌÛÎØ÷ÎÍÙÔìÛÊÊÓÉÔÈÛÎÑÔÍÇÉ×ÛÎØ ÈÔ×îÛÈÔÛÎôÛÐÐèÛÎÑôÍÇÉ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 71 Archaeological Field Inventory and Presence/Absence Testing Results ûÎÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÖÓ×ÐØÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÍÖÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×ØÛÊ×ÛÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û ÚÃÛúÛÉÓÎê×É×ÛÊÙÔÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÓÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ èÔ×ÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÖÍÙÇÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÊÍÇÈ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØ úÛÉÓÎÛÐÉÍÛÈÈ×ÏÌÈ×ØÈÍÐÍÙÛÈ×ÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÊ×ÙÍÊØ×ØÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÓÈ×ùûéùÐ úÛÉÓÎÅÛÉÇÎÛÚÐ×ÈÍÐÍÙÛÈ×ÓÈØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÓ×ÐØÅÍÊÑÍÊØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ××ÄÌÐÍÊÛÈÍÊÃÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕ Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÚ×ÐÍÅîÍÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÍÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ×ÊÛÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÅ×Ê× ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÖÓ×ÐØÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃ ÷ÄÌÐÍÊÛÈÍÊÃÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÅÛÉÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÓÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÙÊ××Ñ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖùûéùÐÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÊÛÚÉ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÐÃ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÉûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊ×ÍÖÚÇÊÓ×ØÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÙÔÛÎÕ× ÛÎØÉÓÎÙ×ÎÍÎ×ÅØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔÓÉÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÅÛÉ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÈÔ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÛÊ×ÉÈÓÐÐÆÛÐÓØèÅ×ÐÆ×ÚÛÙÑÔÍ×È×ÉÈÇÎÓÈÉúèçÉ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÖÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØùûéùÐÅ×Ê××ÄÙÛÆÛÈ×Ø ÛÎØÉÙÊ××Î×ØÖÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉèÔ××ÄÌÐÍÊÛÈÍÊÃÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔ×Ê×ÅÛÉÎÍ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÍÎÈÔ×ÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÍÊÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÈÔ× ÈÅ×ÐÆ×úèçÉÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈÓÎÕÈÔÛÈùûéùÐÓÉÎÍÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÈ×ÉÈ×ØíÚÉ×ÊÆ×Ø ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÛÈÔÓÎÙÔÛÊÙÍÛÐÐ×ÎÉÛÎØÍÃÉÈ×ÊÉÔ×ÐÐÖÊÛÕÏ×ÎÈÓÎúèçÈÅÍÙÔÛÊÙÍÛÐÖÐ×ÙÑÉ ÍÎ×úèçÛÎØÍÎ×ÓÎúèçÛÎØÛÙÐÛÏÉÔ×ÐÐÅÛÉÊ×ÙÍÆ×Ê×ØÎ×ÛÊÈÔ××ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÉËÇÓÊÊ×Ð ÚÇÊÊÍÅûÐÐÍÖÈÔ×É×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÅ×Ê×ÓÎÛÔÓÕÔÐÃØÓÉÈÇÊÚ×ØÛÊ×ÛéÈÛÎØÛÊØÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ Ê×ÙÍÊØÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÉ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÖÓÐ×ÛÎØÌÔÍÈÍÕÊÛÌÔÉÅ×Ê×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÇÎÓÈÉÍÓÐ ÙÔÛÊÙÍÛÐÉÛÏÌÐ×ÉÅ×Ê×ÛÐÉÍÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×ØÇÎÓÈÉûÐÐúèçÉÅ×Ê× ÚÛÙÑÖÓÐÐ×ØÛÎØÅÔ××ÐÊÍÐÐ×Ø Unknown Cultural Resources in the Project Areas èÔ×Ê×É×ÛÊÙÔÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈÉÛÐÍÅÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÛÉÈ×ÛÊÈÔØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÐÍÅÈÍÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ É×ÎÉÓÈÓÆÓÈÃÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×Ö×ÅÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÊ×ÙÍÊØ×ØÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÎØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ ÉÓÈ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛËÇÛÊÈ×ÊÏÓÐ×ÍÖ×ÛÙÔÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û èÔ×Ê×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÈÍÚ×ÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÓÎÛØÆ×ÊÈ×ÎÈØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÓ×ÉÍÖÚÇÊÓ×Ø ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÉØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÛÎÃ ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÉ×ÄÌÍÉ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÚÇÊÓ×ØÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÎØ ÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÔÇÏÛÎ Ê×ÏÛÓÎÉøÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÓÎÈ×ÕÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÛÎØÉÇÚÉ×ËÇ×ÎÈ ÐÍÉÉÍÖÉÙÓ×ÎÈÓÖÓÙÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈ Discussion: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? No Impact. åÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×ðÍÇÓÉéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÔÍÏ×ÉÓÈ×ÓÉÛùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÍÏÏ×ÏÍÊÛÈÓÆ× éÓÈ×ÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÎÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔ ×ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÛÎØÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈÛÎÃÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÓÉ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÓÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÐÛÙ×ÉÍÊÈÔ× îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÐÛÙ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 72 Environmental Checklist b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Impact CUL-1 ÷Æ×ÎÈÔÍÇÕÔÎÍÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÅ×Ê×Ê×ÙÍÆ×Ê×ØÓÎ ÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ× ÛÚÉ×ÎÙ×È×ÉÈÓÎÕÖÍÊùûéùÐÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÊ×Æ×ÛÐÛÉÃ×È ÇÎÑÎÍÅÎÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Mitigation Measure CUL-1 ìÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÕÊÍÇÎØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÓÎÕ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÎØÇÙÈÛÈÛÓÐÕÛÈ×Ï××ÈÓÎÕÈÍÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÎ×ÐÍÖÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊ×ÄÌÍÉÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÎØÈÍ Ê×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÚÇÊÓ×ØÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×Éì×ÊÉÍÎÎ×ÐÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏ×ØÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÙ×ØÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈ ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×ØÇÌÍÎÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÊÉÇÉÌ×ÙÈ×ØØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÖÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊ Implementation: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÛÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÖÓ×ÐØÏ××ÈÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Mitigation Measure CUL-2: çÌÍÎØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÖÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÚÇÊÓ×ØÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÎØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÉÑ×Ð×ÈÛÐÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎ Ö××ÈÍÖ ÈÔ×ÖÓÎØÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÔÛÐÈ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓ×Ø èÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÊ×ÈÛÓÎÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÈÍÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÛÎØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ÈÔ× ÖÓÎØùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÕÓÎÛÕÛÓÎÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÈÍ×ÄÛÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÛÉÉ×ÉÉÈÔ×ÓÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ÍÖÖ×ÊÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐÉÖÍÊÛÎÃÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ×ÄÌÐÍÊÛÈÍÊÃÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉØ××Ï×ØÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎØ ÍÊÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÛÎÃÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÊ ÇÎÓËÇ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú××Î×ÄÌÍÉ×Ø óÖÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÓÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÇÎÓËÇ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÛÎØÓÖ ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÓÉÎÍÈÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÈÔ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÍÖ éÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÏÛÃÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÛôÇÏÛÎÚÍÎ××ÓÈÔ×ÊÓÉÍÐÛÈ×ØÍÊÓÎÈÛÙÈÚÇÊÓÛÐÉ ÚôÛÚÓÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÙÙÇÌÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÙ×Ê×ÏÍÎÓÛÐÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÛÉÓÎÈ×ÊÌÊ×È×ØÖÊÍÏÊÍÙÑÊÓÎÕÉ Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈ ÕÊÍÇÎØØ×ÌÊ×ÉÉÓÍÎÉØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÙ×ÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÛÙÈÓÍÎ×ÕÔÍÇÉ×ÖÐÍÍÊÉ ÙûÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÙÔÓÌÌ×ØÉÈÍÎ×ÍÚÒ×ÙÈÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÐ×ÌÍÓÎÈÉÛÎØÚÓÖÛÙ×ÉÕÊÍÇÎØÉÈÍÎ× ÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÏÛÎÍÉÏ×ÈÛÈ×ÉÏÍÊÈÛÊÉÌ×ÉÈÐ×ÉÕÊÓÎØÓÎÕÉÈÍÎ×ÉÌÓÈÈ×ØÔÛÏÏ×ÊÉÈÍÎ×ÉÛÎØ ÉÔ×ÐÐÛÎØÚÍÎ×ÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÍÊÎÛÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÚ×ÛØÉ ØæÛÊÓÍÇÉÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÉÛÏÌÐ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÔ×ÛÊÈÔÉÖÓÊ×ÙÊÛÙÑ×ØÊÍÙÑÚÛÑ×ØÛÎØÆÓÈÊÓÖÓ×ØÙÐÛÃÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈ ÙÛÙÔ×ÉÖÛÇÎÛÐÛÎØÉÔ×ÐÐÖÓÉÔÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÅÔÓÙÔÌ×ÊÏÓÈØÓ×ÈÛÊÃÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈÓÆ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎ ÉÍÓÐÉÈÊÛÈÓÕÊÛÌÔÃÓÎØÓÙÛÈÓÆ×ÍÖÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ×óÉÍÐÛÈ×ØÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉ ÈÔÈÔ ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÏÛÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÖÓÎØÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÐÛÈ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ×ÛÊÐÃ Ù×ÎÈÇÊÓ×ÉíÚÒ×ÙÈÉÛÎØ Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÌ×ÊÓÍØÙÛÎÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÛéÈÊÇÙÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÍÊÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÖÍÇÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÚÊÓÙÑÉÙÍÚÚÐ×É ÚÍÇÐØ×ÊÉÉÈÛÙÑ×ØÖÓ×ÐØÉÈÍÎ× ÌÍÉÈÔÍÐ×É×ÈÙ ÚèÊÛÉÔÌÓÈÉÌÊÓÆÓ×ÉÅ×ÐÐÉÛÎØÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉ ÙóÉÍÐÛÈ×ØÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉÍÊÓÉÍÐÛÈ×ØÙÐÇÉÈ×ÊÉÍÖÏÛÎÇÖÛÙÈÇÊ×ØÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉ×ÕÕÐÛÉÉÚÍÈÈÐ×ÉÏ×ÈÛÐÙÛÎÉ ÏÛÎÇÖÛÙÈÇÊ×ØÅÍÍØÓÈ×ÏÉ×ÈÙ ØôÇÏÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉ óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÍÈÔÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉÛÎØÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÛÎÚ×ÛÈÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ØÈÍôÓÉÌÛÎÓÙûÉÓÛÎ ÛÎØÍÈÔ×Ê×ÈÔÎÓÙÍÊÊÛÙÓÛÐÕÊÍÇÌÉÛÊ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈéÇÙÔÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÍÊÙÐÇÉÈ×ÊÉÍÖÛÊÈÓÖÛÙÈÉÛÎØÉÛÏÌÐ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ× Ê×ÏÛÓÎÉÍÖÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÊÛÉÔÌÓÈÉÛÎØÌÊÓÆÓ×É City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 73 ÈÔ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÎØÉÛÎØÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÓÏÌÛÙÈÉèÔ×ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÌÐÛÎ ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ××ÄÈÊÛÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÎÍÎÊ×ØÇÎØÛÎÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐØÛÈÛÈÍ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÊ×É×ÛÊÙÔÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ× ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØèÔ×ÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÛÎØÉÔÛÐÐ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛØ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÈ×ÙÔÎÓÙÛÐÊ×ÌÍÊÈÈÔÛÈÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÖÓÐ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É óÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎéÃÉÈ×ÏîÍÊÈÔÅ×ÉÈóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎù×ÎÈ×ÊùéçêÍÔÎ×ÊÈìÛÊÑùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ× ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÎØÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÙ×ÇÎÈÓÐÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø óÖÔÇÏÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÛÊ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×Ê×ØÈÔ×ÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÔÛÎØÐ×ØÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔéÈÛÈ×ÐÛÅ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃï×ØÓÙÛÐ÷ÄÛÏÓÎ×Ê ùÍÊÍÎ×Ê Implementation: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Mitigation Measure CUL-3: ûÐÐ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÉÈÍÌÅÍÊÑÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÛÖÓÎØÓÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÍÖ×ÄÌÍÉÇÊ×ÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÉÔÛÐÐÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ÈÔ×Î××ØÈÍÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÎÃÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛÕ×ÎÙÃóÎÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎÃÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÈÔÛÈÔÛÉÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊ ÕÊÍÇÎØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÓÎÕÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ Implementation: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Timing: óÎÙÐÇØ×ÓÎìÐÛÎÉÛÎØéÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Mitigation Measure CUL-4: ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÍÎÛÉÌÍÈÙÔ×ÙÑÓÎÕÚÛÉÓÉÉÔÛÐÐ Ú×ÇÎØ×ÊÈÛÑ×ÎØÇÊÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛ ÖÍÍÈÚÇÖÖ×Ê ÂÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÍÖùûéùÐûÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ÓÎÙÐÇØ××ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÚÊÓØÕ× ÛÚÇÈÏ×ÎÈÉÍÊÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÛÊÈÔÅÍÊÑÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É Implementation: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎùûéùÐ éÌÍÈÙÔ×ÙÑÓÎÕÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ØÍÎ×ÛÈÈÔ×ÍÎÉ×ÈÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÛÈ Ð×ÛÉÈÍÎÙ×ÛÕÛÓÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Mitigation Measure CUL-5: ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÍÖÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÐÐ Ú×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÍÎÛÎÍÎÙÛÐÐÚÛÉÓÉÖÍÊÛÊ×ÛÉÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÍÖùûéùÐÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÖÍÍÈÚÇÖÖ×ÊÂÍÎ× Implementation: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÈ óÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÓÍÎ×ØÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 74 Environmental Checklist No Impact èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÑÎÍÅÎÇÎÓËÇ×ÌÛÐ×ÍÎÈÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÊÉÓÈ×ÉÍÊÇÎÓËÇ× Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. ïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ùçð ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔùçðÅÓÐÐÕÇÓØ×ÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ÉÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÚ×ÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔ× ×Æ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÍÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÇÎÑÎÍÅÎÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×Ê×ØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 75 Less Less 3.6GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Û÷ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÍÊÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÍ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÊÓÉÑÍÖÐÍÉÉÓÎÒÇÊÃÍÊ Ø×ÛÈÔÓÎÆÍÐÆÓÎÕ ÓêÇÌÈÇÊ×ÍÖÛÑÎÍÅÎ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×ÖÛÇÐÈ ÛÉØ×ÐÓÎ×ÛÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÊ×Ù×ÎÈ ûÐËÇÓÉÈìÊÓÍÐÍ÷ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×öÛÇÐÈâÍÎÓÎÕ ïÛÌÓÉÉÇ×ØÚÃÈÔ×éÈÛÈ×õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÖÍÊ ÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÊÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÍÈÔ×ÊÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÛÑÎÍÅÎÖÛÇÐÈýê×Ö×ÊÈÍ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÍÖïÓÎ×ÉÛÎØõ×ÍÐÍÕÃéÌ×ÙÓÛÐ ìÇÚÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÓéÈÊÍÎÕÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙÕÊÍÇÎØÉÔÛÑÓÎÕý ÓÓÓé×ÓÉÏÓÙÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÕÊÍÇÎØÖÛÓÐÇÊ× ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÐÓËÇ×ÖÛÙÈÓÍÎý ÓÆðÛÎØÉÐÓØ×Éý Úê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÉÍÓÐ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÍÊ ÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÈÍÌÉÍÓÐý Ùú×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÛÕ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÇÎÓÈÍÊÉÍÓÐ ÈÔÛÈÓÉÇÎÉÈÛÚÐ×ÍÊÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÏ× ÇÎÉÈÛÚÐ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÍÎÍÊÍÖÖÉÓÈ× ÐÛÎØÉÐÓØ×ÐÛÈ×ÊÛÐÉÌÊ×ÛØÓÎÕ ÉÇÚÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÐÓËÇ×ÖÛÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÙÍÐÐÛÌÉ×ý Øú×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÆ×ÉÍÓÐÛÉ Ø×ÖÓÎ×ØÓÎèÛÚÐ×úÍÖÈÔ×çÎÓÖÍÊÏ úÇÓÐØÓÎÕùÍØ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÊÓÉÑÉÈÍÐÓÖ×ÍÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃý ×ôÛÆ×ÉÍÓÐÉÓÎÙÛÌÛÚÐ×ÍÖÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃ ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÉ×ÌÈÓÙÈÛÎÑÉÍÊ ÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×ÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐ ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÅÔ×Ê×É×Å×ÊÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈ ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÍÖÅÛÉÈ× ÅÛÈ×Êý Environmental Setting éÍÓÐÉ èÔ×ÉÍÓÐÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÓÉÙÐÛÉÉÓÖÓ×ØÛÉéÍÊÊ×ÎÈÍöÓÎ×éÛÎØÃðÍÛÏ Ê×Ù×ÎÈÛÐÐÇÆÓÇÏÖÊÍÏÉ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÛÊÃÊÍÙÑÉèÔÓÉÛÐÐÇÆÓÇÏÔÛÉÚ××ÎØ×ÌÍÉÓÈ×ØÚÃéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 76 Environmental Checklist ÛÉÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎèÔ×Ì×ÊÏ×ÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÚÍÈÔÈÔ× ÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÉÍÓÐÉÛÎØÉÇÚÉÍÓÐÓÉÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÛÉÓÉÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÔÍÐØÓÎÕÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÛÎØÈÔ××ÊÍÉÓÍÎÔÛÂÛÊØ ÓÉÎ×ÕÐÓÕÓÚÐ×èÔ×ÆÛÐÐ×ÃÖÐÍÍÊÉÐÍÌ×ÉÛÊ×ÏÓÐØÛÎØÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÆÛÊÃÖÊÍÏÈÍ Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈèÔ× ÉÓØ×ÉÐÍÌ×ÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÆÛÐÐ×ÃÖÐÍÍÊÛÊ×ÙÐÛÉÉÓÖÓ×ØÛÉìÐ×ÛÉÛÎÈÍÎÕÊÛÆ×ÐÐÃÐÍÛÏÅÓÈÔÉÈ××ÌÉÐÍÌ×ÉÈÍ ÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÅÓÈÔÌ×ÊÏ×ÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÔÛÂÛÊØÙÐÛÉÉÓÖÓ×ØÛÉÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÛÎØÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÊ× ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÍ Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÕÊÛØ×çéø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊ× ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐõ×ÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØõ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÎØé×ÓÉÏÓÙôÛÂÛÊØÉ èÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ ÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÌÊÓÏÛÊÃÕ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÔÛÂÛÊØÉÅÓÈÔÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ÛÊ×ÐÛÎØÉÐÓØ×ÉÛÎØÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÐÍÙÛÐÛÙÈÓÆ×ÖÛÇÐÈÈÊÛÙ×Éé×ÓÉÏÓÙÛÐÐÃÓÎØÇÙ×Ø ÕÊÍÇÎØÉÔÛÑÓÎÕÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÖÛÇÐÈÊÇÌÈÇÊ×ÛÎØÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÖÍÊÏÉÍÖ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×ÈÊÓÕÕ×Ê×ØÕÊÍÇÎØÖÛÓÐÇÊ× ÛÊ×ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃØÇÊÓÎÕÐÛÊÕ××ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×ÉèÔ×É×Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÔÛÂÛÊØÉÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÎØÌÇÚÐÓÙÉÛÖ× èÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÛÐÉÍÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×É×ÓÉÏÓÙÛÐÐÃÛÙÈÓÆ×éÛÎ öÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÊ×ÕÓÍÎÅÔÓÙÔÔÍÉÈÉÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÛÙÈÓÆ××ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×íÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈÛÎØ ÏÍÉÈÛÙÈÓÆ×ÖÛÇÐÈÉÓÎÈÔ×ÅÍÊÐØÈÔ×éÛÎûÎØÊ×ÛÉÖÛÇÐÈÙÊÍÉÉ×ÉÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÅÍÍÈÔ×ÊÖÛÇÐÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÙÐÍÉ×ÐÃÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éÛÎûÎØÊ×ÛÉ ÖÛÇÐÈÈÔ×éÛÊÕ×ÎÈú×ÊÊÍÙÛÐÛÎØïÍÎÈ×æÓÉÈÛéÔÛÎÎÍÎÖÛÇÐÈÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÌÍÊÈÓÍÎ ùÓÈÃèÔ×É×ÖÛÇÐÈÉÏÛÎÓÖ×ÉÈÓÎÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÉÈÃÐ×ÉïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×éÛÎ ûÎØÊ×ÛÉÖÛÇÐÈÓÉÌÊ×ØÍÏÓÎÛÎÈÐÃÊÓÕÔÈÐÛÈ×ÊÛÐÉÈÊÓÑ×ÉÐÓÌÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ××ÛÊÈÔÊÇÌÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎÛÔÍÊÓÂÍÎÈÛÐ ÖÛÉÔÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÍÌÌÍÉÓÈ×ÉÓØ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÖÛÇÐÈÏÍÆÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ÊÓÕÔÈÅÓÈÔÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÈÍ×ÛÙÔÍÈÔ×Ê ïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×éÛÊÕ×ÎÈú×ÊÊÍÙÛÐÛÎØïÍÎÈ×æÓÉÈÛéÔÛÎÎÍÎÖÛÇÐÈÉÓÉÏÍÊ×ÆÛÊÓÛÚÐ×ÓÎÉÈÃÐ× úÍÈÔÍÖÈÔ×É×ÖÛÇÐÈÉÛÊ×ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÂ×ØÚÃÖÛÇÐÈÓÎÕÅÔ×Ê×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÆ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐ ØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÙÙÇÊÉÍÎÛÎÓÎÙÐÓÎ×ØÌÐÛÎ×ÛÎØÍÎ×ÉÓØ×ÓÉ×Ð×ÆÛÈ×ØÓ×ÈÔÊÇÉÈÍÆ×Ê ÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÉÓØùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ é×Æ×ÊÛÐÙÛÈ×ÕÍÊÓ×ÉÍÖõ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙôÛÂÛÊØÉÛÊ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛèÔ×ïÍÎÈ×æÓÉÈÛ ÖÛÇÐÈÊÇÌÈÇÊ×ÂÍÎ×ÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÎ×ÛÊïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÛÎØ ÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÓÎÈ×ÎÉ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÉÔÛÑÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÍÖÛÎ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×èÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÓÉÛÐÉÍÛ ÏÛÌÌ×ØÂÍÎ×ÍÖÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×ÓÎØÇÙ×ØÐÛÎØÉÐÓØÓÎÕéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃ èÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÈÔÛÈÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÐÓËÇ×ÖÛÙÈÓÍÎÇÎØ×ÊÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉöÐÍÍØÓÎÇÎØÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÛÐÉÍÛÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÛÉÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎ èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎìÍÐÓÙÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÛÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÊÓÉÑÉ ÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÕ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÎØÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙÔÛÂÛÊØÉèÔÓÉÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÐÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐÉ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÏÛÌÌ×ØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÔÛÂÛÊØÂÍÎ×ÉÈÍÇÉ×ÛÖÍÊÏÛÐÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙ Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ Discussion: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact. ûÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÕ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÏÛÌÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÓÉÎÍÈ ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎûÐËÇÓÉÈìÊÓÍÐÍ÷ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×öÛÇÐÈâÍÎ×ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 77 ìÐÛÎõ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÎØé×ÓÉÏÓÙôÛÂÛÊØÉÏÛÌÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ïÍÎÈÛ æÓÉÈÛöÛÇÐÈÂÍÎ×ÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÓÎöÓÕÇÊ×úùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎô×ÛÐÈÔÛÎØéÛÖ×ÈÃùÔÛÌÈ×Ê ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙÛÐÐÃÛÙÈÓÆ×ÛÊ×ÛûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ× ÈÔ×ïÍÎÈÛæÓÉÈÛÖÛÇÐÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÇÈ ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÇÈÔÅ×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ× ÔÓÕÔÌÊÍÚÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÆ×ÊÃÉÈÊÍÎÕÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙÉÔÛÑÓÎÕØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× Î×ÄÈÏÛÒÍÊ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×ÍÎÈÔÓÉÖÛÇÐÈÍÊÈÔ×éÛÎûÎØÊ×ÛÉÖÛÇÐÈôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÌÐÛÙÓÎÕÛÌÊ×ÖÛÚÊÓÙÛÈ×ØÙÐ×ÛÊÉÌÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÛÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆÓÎÕ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕÙÊ××Ñ ÚÛÎÑÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÉÔÍÊ×ØÇÌÅÓÈÔÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÎÍÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ× ÚÇÓÐÈÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Impact. ûÊ×ÛÉÎ×ÛÊÙÊ××ÑÉÛÎØÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÛÊ×ÉÇÉÙ×ÌÈÓÚÐ×ÈÍÐÓËÇ×ÖÛÙÈÓÍÎÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÍÎ ÈÔ×Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÔÛÂÛÊØÏÛÌÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃöÓÕÇÊ×úÍÖÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎùÓÈÃÌÍÐÓÙÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×É ÛÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙ Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÐÛÎÉÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐéÓÎÙ×ÛÐÐÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÍÎùÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØÐÛÎØÈÔ×ÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÆÓ×Å×ØÖÍÊÛØ×ËÇÛÙÃÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÎÍÈÉÇÉÙ×ÌÈÓÚÐ×ÈÍÕÊÍÇÎØÖÛÓÐÇÊ× iv) Landslides? No Impact. ûÊ×ÛÉÎ×ÛÊÙÊ××ÑÉÛÎØÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÛÊ×ÉÇÉÙ×ÌÈÓÚÐ×ÈÍÐÓËÇ×ÖÛÙÈÓÍÎÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÍÎ ÈÔ×Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÔÛÂÛÊØÏÛÌÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃöÓÕÇÊ×úÍÖÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎùÓÈÃÌÍÐÓÙÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×É ÛÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙ Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÐÛÎÉÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÔ× ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÛÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÈÊÛÓÐÅÔÓÙÔÅÓÐÐÚ×É×ÈÚÛÙÑÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÛÎØ ÓÈÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÙÛÇÉ×ÐÛÎØÉÐÓØ×ÉÍÊÌÇÈÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÉÈÉÓÎØÛÎÕ×ÊÍÇÉ ÛÊ×ÛÉÉÇÉÌ×ÙÈÓÚÐ×ÈÍÐÛÎØÉÐÓØ×ÉèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÎÍÓÏÌÛÙÈ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÇÉÓÎÕÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×Ê øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈúïìÉÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×É××ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÛÎØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÍÊ úïìÉÉ×ÈÖÍÊÈÔÚÃÈÔ×úÛÃûÊ×ÛéÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈûÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛ ùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃçÊÚÛÎêÇÎÍÖÖìÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎìÊ×Æ×ÎÈÓÍÎìÊÍÕÊÛÏúÐÇ×ÌÊÓÎÈÖÍÊÛùÐ×ÛÎúÛÃ ÛÉ Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×Ø×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÓÎÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÉÖÊÍÏÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÉÍÓÐ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØÐÍÉÉÍÖ ÈÍÌÉÍÓÐØÇÊÓÎÕÛÎØÛÖÈ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÚÃÛÐÓÙ×ÎÉ×ØÌÊÍÖ×ÉÉÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍ Õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙ É×ÓÉÏÓÙÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÛÎØÕÊÛØÓÎÕÌÐÛÎÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÍÔ×ÐÌ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÛÇÉ×ÓÎÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÍÊÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÍÎÍÊÍÖÖÉÓÈ×ÐÛÎØÉÐÓØ× ÐÛÈ×ÊÛÐÉÌÊ×ÛØÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÐÓËÇ×ÖÛÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÙÍÐÐÛÌÉ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 78 Environmental Checklist d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÚÃÛÐÓÙ×ÎÉ×ØÌÊÍÖ×ÉÉÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍ ùÓÈÃÕ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙ É×ÓÉÏÓÙÛÎØ×ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÓÎÕÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÛÎØÙÍÎÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×úÇÓÐØÓÎÕùÍØ× Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÈÔ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÎ×ÅÉ×ÌÈÓÙÈÛÎÑÉ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 79 Less Less 3.7GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ûõ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ×ÓÈÔ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÍÊÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃ ÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÎ ÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈý ÚùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÌÐÛÎ ÌÍÐÓÙÃÍÊÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛØÍÌÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ× ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÊ×ØÇÙÓÎÕÈÔ××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÖ ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×ÕÛÉ×Éý Environmental and Regulatory Setting õÛÉ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÊÛÌÔ×ÛÈÓÎÈÔ×ÛÈÏÍÉÌÔ×Ê×ÛÎØÛÖÖ×ÙÈÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×È×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ× ÛÊ×ÑÎÍÅÎÛÉÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×ÕÛÉ×ÉõôõùÍÏÏÍÎõôõÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÙÛÊÚÍÎØÓÍÄÓØ×ùíÏ×ÈÔÛÎ× ùôÎÓÈÊÍÇÉÍÄÓØ×îíÔÃØÊÍÖÐÇÍÊÍÙÛÊÚÍÎÉôöùÉÛÎØÉÇÐÖÇÊÔ×ÄÛÖÐÇÍÊÓØ×éö õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÔÇÏÛÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÈÍÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐõôõÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ× ÛÈÏÍÉÌÔ×Ê×ÛÎØÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÉÙÓ×ÎÈÓÉÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú×ÙÍÏ×ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕÐÃÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ×ØÛÚÍÇÈÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖ ÈÔ×É××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÎÕÐÍÚÛÐÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ôÇÏÛÎÛÎÈÔÊÍÌÍÕ×ÎÓÙÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖõôõÉÔÛÉ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÉÈ×ÛØÓÐÃÉÓÎÙ×ÌÊ×ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÈÓÏ×ÉÛÎØÛÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙùíÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÆ× ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÖÊÍÏÛÌÊ×ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÆÛÐÇ×ÍÖ ÌÌÏÈÍ ÌÌÏÓÎ îíûû èÔ×çÎÓÈ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐìÛÎ×ÐÍÎùÐÓÏÛÈ×ùÔÛÎÕ×óìùùÖÍÇÊÈÔÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÊ×ÌÍÊÈûê ÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔÛÈÊ×Ù×ÎÈÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐÃÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈÓÎÕ ÏÛÎÃÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÅÛÈ×Ê×ÙÍÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÖÍÍØÙÍÛÉÈÉÛÎØÔ×ÛÐÈÔóìùù èÔ×ûêÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔÛÈÏÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÕÐÍÚÛÐÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×È×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ× ÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÏÓØ Ù×ÎÈÇÊÃÓÉÆ×ÊÃÐÓÑ×ÐÃØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÛÎÈÔÊÍÌÍÕ×ÎÓÙõôõ ÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÉóìùù õôõÉÙÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÈÔ×ÛÈÏÍÉÌÔ×Ê×ÐÍÎÕÛÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÃÛÊ××ÏÓÈÈ×ØèÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÛ õôõÈÍÛÚÉÍÊÚÛÎØÈÊÛÌÔ×ÛÈÓÎÈÔ×ÛÈÏÍÉÌÔ×Ê×ÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÓÈÉÕÐÍÚÛÐÅÛÊÏÓÎÕÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ õåìèÔ×Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×ÕÛÉÖÍÊÏ×ÛÉÇÊÓÎÕõåìÓÉùíÅÔÓÙÔÔÛÉÛõåìÍÖÍÎ×úÃ ÙÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎùôÔÛÉÛõåìÍÖ ÅÔÓÙÔÏ×ÛÎÉÈÔÛÈÍÎ×ÏÍÐ×ÙÇÐ×ÍÖùôÔÛÉ ÈÓÏ×ÉÈÔ× ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÕÐÍÚÛÐÅÛÊÏÓÎÕÛÉÍÎ×ÏÍÐ×ÙÇÐ×ÍÖùíïÇÐÈÓÌÐÃÓÎÕÈÔ××ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÎÍÎ ùíõôõÉÚÃÈÔ×ÓÊõåìØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÉÈÔ×ÓÊÙÛÊÚÍÎØÓÍÄÓØ××ËÇÓÆÛÐ×ÎÈùí×ÅÔÓÙÔ×ÎÛÚÐ×ÉÛ ÙÍÏÚÓÎ×ØÕÐÍÚÛÐÅÛÊÏÓÎÕÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÚ××ÄÌÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÈ×ÊÏÉÍÖÏÛÉÉùí×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ èÛÚÐ× Ú×ÐÍÅÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉÈÔ×õåìÉÍÖÙÍÏÏÍÎõôõÉ Global Warming óÎ ÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÈÛÈ×ð×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÇÊ×ÛØÍÌÈ×ØÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ Solutions Act of 2006 ûÉÉ×ÏÚÐÃúÓÐÐûú ÅÔÓÙÔÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛûÓÊê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉúÍÛÊØ ûêúÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ× ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Û ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×õôõÐÓÏÓÈ ÈÔÛÈÓÉ×ËÇÛÐÈÍÈÔ× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÐ×Æ×Ð ÛØÍÌÈÛÏÛÎØÛÈÍÊÃõôõÊ×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÊÇÐ×ÖÍÊ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛØÍÌÈÛéÙÍÌÓÎÕìÐÛÎÈÍÛÙÔÓ×Æ×ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×õôõ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÐÓÏÓÈÛÎØÛØÍÌÈÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÛÙÔÓ×Æ×ÈÔ×ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÈ×ÙÔÎÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÐÃÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÛÎØ ÙÍÉÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 80 Environmental Checklist Table 3.7-1. GHG Global Warming Potentials Global Warming Potential (GWP) Compound Relative to CO 2 ùÛÊÚÍÎøÓÍÄÓØ×ùí ï×ÈÔÛÎ×ùô îÓÈÊÍÇÉíÄÓØ×îí ôÃØÊÍÖÐÇÍÊÍÙÛÊÚÍÎÉôöùÉ ôöù ôöù Û ôöù ôùöù éÇÐÖÇÊô×ÄÛÖÐÇÍÊÓØ×éö Source: ARB 2009. óÎ ÈÔ×ûêúÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÐ×Æ×ÐÛÎØÙÍÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕ õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÐÓÏÓÈÍÖ ÏÓÐÐÓÍÎÏ×ÈÊÓÙÈÍÎÉÍÖÙÛÊÚÍÎØÓÍÄÓØ××ËÇÓÆÛÐ×ÎÈÉïïèùí ûêú Climate Change Scoping Plan óÎ ÈÔ×ûêúÌÇÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÈÉÅÔÓÙÔÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÚÉ×ÎÈ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÇÎØ×ÊÛÛÉúûçÉÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÐ×Æ×ÐÉ ÍÖÏÓÐÐÓÍÎïèùí ÛÎØÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÎÇÏ×ÊÍÇÉÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÓ×ÏÛÎØÛÈÍÊÃÊÇÐ×ÉÛÎØ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÆÍÐÇÎÈÛÊÃÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐÛÙÔÓ×Æ×ÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈïïèùí ÍÖÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØ Ê×ØÇÙ×ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÍ Ð×Æ×ÐÉÚÃ ûêú ûÐÉÍÓÎ ÈÔ×ûêú ÛØÍÌÈ×ØÓÈÉê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ïÛÎØÛÈÍÊÃê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÍÖõÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×õÛÉ÷ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉèÓÈÐ× ùùêé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ùùê ÅÔÓÙÔÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈ×ÏÓÈ ÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÍÊ×ËÇÛÐÈÍ Ï×ÈÊÓÙÈÍÎÉÍÖùíÛÎÎÇÛÐÐÃÈÍÊ×ÌÍÊÈÈÔ×ÓÊõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔ× ûêú ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÈÔ×úûûëïøÔÛÉÛÐÉÍÛØÍÌÈ×ØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÈÍÈÊÛÙÑÛÎØ Ê×ØÇÙ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÊÃÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉóÎ ÈÔ×úûûëïø×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÉùÐÓÏÛÈ× ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎìÊÍÕÊÛÏÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÕÐÍÚÛÐÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×óÎ ÈÔ×úûûëïøÛØÍÌÈ×ØÛõôõÖ××ÍÖÙ×ÎÈÉÌ×ÊÏ×ÈÊÓÙÈÍÎÍÖõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÛÌÌÐÓ×ÉÈÍ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÚÇÉÓÎ×ÉÉ×ÉóÎ ÈÔ×úûûëïøÊ×Ð×ÛÉ×ØÛÎÇÌØÛÈ×Ø ÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÍÖúÛÃûÊ×Ûõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÚÛÉ×Ã×ÛÊ èÔ×úÛÃûÊ×Û×ÏÓÈÈ×Ø ïïèùí ÓÎ ÅÓÈÔéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÎÕïïèùí ×ÈÍÈÔÓÉÈÍÈÛÐ úûûëïø CEQA Air Quality Guidelines èÔ×ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÖÍÊÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÍ ÛÉÉ×ÉÉÛÎØÏÓÈÓÕÛÈ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÓÏÌÛÙÈÉèÔ×úûûëïøÔÛÉÎÍÈÛØÍÌÈ×ØÛÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÍÖ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÖÍÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×Øõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÚÇÈÈÔ×úûûëïøØÍ×É×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ð×ÛØ ÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÍËÇÛÎÈÓÖÃÛÎØØÓÉÙÐÍÉ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×Øõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ× ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×É××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÎØÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×Ú×ÉÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×Øõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ èÔ×úûûëïøÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÉÛù÷ëûõôõÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÖÍÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÉÇÙÔÛÉÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉÍÖ Ï×ÈÊÓÙÈÍÎÉÍÖÙÛÊÚÍÎØÓÍÄÓØ××ËÇÓÆÛÐ×ÎÈÉïèùí × úûûëïø ÍÊïèùí Ì×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÃ×ÛÊèÔ×úûûëïøØ×ÖÓÎ×É É×ÊÆÓÙ×ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÚ×ÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÔ×úûûëïøÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈ×ÄÙ××ØÈÔ×ù÷ëûÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÈÍÔÛÆ×Û ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃ×ÖÖ×ÙÈ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 81 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines èÔ×ÛÐÉÍÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ× Ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÛÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÆ×ÓÎØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÛÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÓÖÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ï××ÈÉÛÐÐÍÖÈÔ×ÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔ×ÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊ ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÎØÛØ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÓÉÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ× ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐõôõÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÖÍÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÉÓÉ ÛÙÊ×ÉéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÛÙÊ×ÉÓÈÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ öÇÊÈÔ×ÊØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÓÉÚ×ÐÍÅ Existing GHG Emission Sources ûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÓÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÓÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÉÓÈ×ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÛÎÃÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×É ÍÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Proposed GHG Emissions Sources ûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÓÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÉÓÈ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÅÍÇÐØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÉÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÇÌÈÍ ÈÍÈÛÐÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØ ÈÍÈÛÐÅ××Ñ×ÎØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ Discussion: Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? õÐÍÚÛÐÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÓÉÈÔ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÍÖõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÍÊÐØÅÓØ×ÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉØÍ ÎÍÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ××ÎÍÇÕÔõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÍÓÎÖÐÇ×ÎÙ×ÕÐÍÚÛÐÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×èÔÇÉÈÔ×ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÍÖ õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÓÉÚÃÎÛÈÇÊ×ÛÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÖÍÙÇÉ×ØÍÎÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÛÎÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÈÍÕÐÍÚÛÐÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÓÉÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ× Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍØÇÙ×õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÖÇ×ÐÙÍÏÚÇÉÈÓÍÎÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×É××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ ×ÄÙ××ØÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×úûûëïøÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÎÍÈÔÛÆ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÓÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÓÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ× ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÓÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉÓÂ×ÍÖÛÙÊ×ÉèÔ× úûûëïøÔÍÅ×Æ×Ê×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ÉÐ×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÍËÇÛÎÈÓÖÃÛÎØØÓÉÙÐÍÉ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×Ø õôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉûÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÇÉÓÎÕçêú÷ïóé æ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØ×ÏÓÈ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÏ×ÈÊÓÙÈÍÎÉÍÖÙÛÊÚÍÎØÓÍÄÓØ×ïèùíÍÆ×ÊÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÖÓÆ×ÏÍÎÈÔ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÓÍØ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÖùôÛÎØîíÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÖÇ×ÐÙÍÏÚÇÉÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØ Ú×Î×ÕÐÓÕÓÚÐ×èÔ×úûûëïøØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÔÛÆ×ÛÎÛØÍÌÈ×ØõôõÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÖÍÊ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÚÇÈÛÉÊ×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×Øõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ïèùí ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ×ÄÙ××ØÈÔ×õôõÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉÖÍÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÍÖ ïèùí Ì×ÊÃ×ÛÊÛÎØÛÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÈÍÛÎØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÖÓÆ×ÛÙÊ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÓÉÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×ÐÛÎØÇÉ×õôõ CEQA Air Quality ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉÓÂ×ÍÖ ÛÙÊ×ÉùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ× Guidelines ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ú×ÐÍÅÈÔÓÉÉÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÈÔÛÈ×ÄÙ××ØúûûëïøÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÔÊ×ÉÔÍÐØÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÍÛÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÖÊÍÏÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 82 Environmental Checklist b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÌÐÛÎÌÍÐÓÙÃÍÊÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛØÍÌÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÊ×ØÇÙÓÎÕõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉõôõ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÖÊÍÏÍÖÖÊÍÛØ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÛÎØÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÖÍÊÓÎÈÔ× ùÐ×ÛÎûÓÊìÐÛÎÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÈÔ×éÍÇÊÙ×óÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÍÖúÛÃûÊ×Û õÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×õÛÉ÷ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉúûûëïø ÛÎØ ûÌÊÓÏÛÊÃÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÍÖÈÔ× ùÐ×ÛÎûÓÊìÐÛÎÓÉÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ×ÕÛÉ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÍ Ð×Æ×ÐÉÚÃ ÛÎØ Ú×ÐÍÅ Ð×Æ×ÐÉÚÃ èÔ× ùÐ×ÛÎûÓÊìÐÛÎÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÉÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÍÖÖÊÍÛØÛÎØ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎõôõ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÎØÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉØ×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÛÙÔÓ×Æ×Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ õôõÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÕÍÛÐÉ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 83 PotentiallyLess thanLess Than No SignificantSignificant withSignificant Impact ImpactMitigationImpact 3.8HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛùÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÛÂÛÊØÈÍÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙÍÊÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ× ÊÍÇÈÓÎ×ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÇÉ×ÍÊØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÍÖ ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉý ÚùÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÛÂÛÊØÈÍÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙÍÊÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÖÍÊ×É××ÛÚÐ×ÇÌÉ×ÈÛÎØ ÛÙÙÓØ×ÎÈÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÆÍÐÆÓÎÕÈÔ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ× ÍÖÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÎÈÍÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈý Ù÷ÏÓÈÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÊÔÛÎØÐ× ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÍÊÛÙÇÈ×ÐÃÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉÍÊÅÛÉÈ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÍÎ×ËÇÛÊÈ×ÊÏÓÐ×ÍÖÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÉÙÔÍÍÐý Øú×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÛÉÓÈ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÍÎÛÐÓÉÈÍÖÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÉÓÈ×É ÙÍÏÌÓÐ×ØÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍõÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈùÍØ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈ ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÛÂÛÊØÈÍÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙÍÊÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈý ×öÍÊÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎÛÓÊÌÍÊÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÐÛÎÍÊÅÔ×Ê×ÉÇÙÔÛÌÐÛÎÔÛÉ ÎÍÈÚ××ÎÛØÍÌÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÅÍÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖÛ ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÇÉ×ÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÅÍÇÐØ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÉÛÖ×ÈÃÔÛÂÛÊØÖÍÊ Ì×ÍÌÐ×Ê×ÉÓØÓÎÕÍÊÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÊ×Ûý ÖöÍÊÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÛ ÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÛÓÊÉÈÊÓÌÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎÛÉÛÖ×ÈÃÔÛÂÛÊØÖÍÊÌ×ÍÌÐ×Ê×ÉÓØÓÎÕÍÊ ÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Ûý ÕóÏÌÛÓÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÊÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐÃ ÓÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê×ÅÓÈÔÛÎÛØÍÌÈ×Ø×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃ Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÌÐÛÎÍÊ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃ×ÆÛÙÇÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÐÛÎý Ô÷ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÍÊÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÍÛ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÊÓÉÑÍÖÐÍÉÉÓÎÒÇÊÃÍÊØ×ÛÈÔ ÓÎÆÍÐÆÓÎÕÅÓÐØÐÛÎØÖÓÊ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÅÔ×Ê× ÅÓÐØÐÛÎØÉÛÊ×ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÇÊÚÛÎÓÂ×Ø ÛÊ×ÛÉÍÊÅÔ×Ê×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÊ× ÓÎÈ×ÊÏÓÄ×ØÅÓÈÔÅÓÐØÐÛÎØÉý Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 84 Environmental Checklist Environmental Setting ûÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÓÖÓÈÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÍÎÛÐÓÉÈÍÖÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø ÚÃÛÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÍÊÐÍÙÛÐÛÕ×ÎÙÃÍÊÓÖÓÈÔÛÉÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÛÉÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÚÃÉÇÙÔÛÎ ÛÕ×ÎÙÃùÔ×ÏÓÙÛÐÛÎØÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÍÄÓÙÓÈÃÓÕÎÓÈÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÙÍÊÊÍÉÓÆÓÈÃÛÎØÊ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃ ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÙ×ÈÍÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉèÔ×É×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÛÊ×Ø×ÖÓÎ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ùÍØ×ÍÖê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉùùêèÓÈÐ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ûÓÉÛÎÃ ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÈÔÛÈÓÉØÓÉÙÛÊØ×ØÛÚÛÎØÍÎ×ØÍÊÈÍÚ×Ê×ÙÃÙÐ×ØèÔ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔÛÈÊ×ÎØ×ÊÛ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÛÐÉÍÏÛÑ×ÛÅÛÉÈ×ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛô×ÛÐÈÔÛÎØéÛÖ×ÈÃùÍØ×é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔÓÉØ×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎÖÇ×ÐÉÏÍÈÍÊÍÓÐÛÎØÐÇÚÊÓÙÛÎÈÉÓÎÇÉ×ÛÈÛÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÐ×ÛØÚÇÓÐÈÇÌÛÐÍÎÕÊÍÛØÅÛÃÉÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉ÷ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÏÛÃ×ÄÌÍÉ× ÚÇÊÓ×ØÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÌÊÓÍÊÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÉÓÈ×ÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÑÎÍÅÎÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÈ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÛ Ê×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÊÈ×É×ðÓÉÈÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍõÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈùÍØ×é×ÙÈÓÍÎ èÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÇÉÓÎÕú×ÉÈ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉØ×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ× úïìôÛÎØÚÍÍÑèÔ×É×úïìÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×É××ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÇÐÐÈ×ÄÈÍÖÈÔ×É×úïìÉ ôïô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×çÉ×ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ôï èÃÌ×ÉÍÖì×ÉÈùÍÎÈÊÍÐ ôïô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×çÉ×ÓÎçÌÐÛÎØûÊ×ÛÉ ôïô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×çÉ×ÓÎûËÇÛÈÓÙûÊ×ÛÉ ôïæ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈùÐ×ÛÎÓÎÕ ôï æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈöÇ×ÐÓÎÕ ôïæ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ôï ôÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉïÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ôï éÌÓÐÐìÊ×Æ×ÎÈÓÍÎ ôïéÌÓÐÐñÓÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ Discussion: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? No Impact. óÖÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØúïìÉÛÊ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÊÓÉÑÍÖ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÛÂÛÊØÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÍÊ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÊÍÇÈÓÎ×ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÇÉ×ÍÊØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÍÖ ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ØèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÓÎ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍÎÍÈÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÊÓÉÑÖÊÍÏ ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÙÍÏÌÛÊ×ØÈÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No Impact. èÔ×ÍÎÐÃÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÈÍÚ×ÇÉ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ØÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÈÔ×ÖÇ×ÐÉÍÓÐÉÛÎØÐÇÚÊÓÙÛÎÈÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÍÎÉÓÈ×Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÛÎØ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÏÛÙÔÓÎ×ÊÃÛÎØÛÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖúïìÉÅÍÇÐØÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÉÑÍÖ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 85 Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÖÍÊ×É××ÛÚÐ×ÇÌÉ×ÈÛÎØÛÙÙÓØ×ÎÈÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÆÍÐÆÓÎÕÈÔ×Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×ÍÖÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉ ô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÇÉ×ØÈÍÙÍÎÈÊÍÐ×ÄÍÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎûÐÓÙ×ÎÉ×Ø Ô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÍÊ×ÓÈÔ×Ê×ÏÌÐÍÃ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ× ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÔÛÎØÐÓÎÕÍÖÛÐÐÔ×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×ÉóÖÈÔ×Ô×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×ÉÛÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÍÎÉÓÈ×ÛÐÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÉÈÍÊ×ØÓÎÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ÊÉÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÙÍØ×ÉúïìÉÛÊ×ÛÐÉÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÖÍÊ Ø×ÛÐÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÔÛÎØÐÓÎÕÛÎØÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÔ×ÊÚÓÙÓØ×ÉÛÎØÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or hazardous waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. èÔ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ××ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÖ ÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉûÓÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÛÊ× ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ûÓÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃé×ÙÈÓÍÎ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. ûÉ×ÛÊÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖèÍÄÓÙ éÇÚÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉôÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉåÛÉÈ×ÛÎØéÇÚÉÈÛÎÙ×éÓÈ×ðÓÉÈùÍÊÈ×É×ðÓÉÈØÓØÎÍÈÃÓ×ÐØÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÓÎ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÍÊÓÎÈÔ×ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃèÔ×ÍÎÐÃÊ×ÉÇÐÈÖÍÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅÛÉÛÈ îèÛÎÈÛÇûÆ×ÎÇ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÛÚÍÇÈÏÓÐ×É×ÛÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×èÔÓÉèÛÎÈÛÇûÆ×ÎÇ× ÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÎÍÊÅÍÇÐØÈÔÛÈÉÓÈ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÓÈ× ûìÔÛÉ×Ê×ÌÍÊÈÅÛÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÎïÛÃùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÔÛØÚ××ÎÛÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÍÊÙÔÛÊØÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ÐÛÈ× ÉÈÔÓÉ Ê×ÌÍÊÈÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÈÔÛÈÛÉÍÓÐÉÊ×ÌÍÊÈÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎÃÏÛÒÍÊØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÍÖÉÍÓÐÛÈÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖÔÛÂÛÊØÍÇÉÐ×Æ×ÐÉÍÖÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Ê×ÉÓØÇ×ÏÛÃ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÈÔ×ÉÍÓÐ ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÅÛÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÍÊÙÔÛÊØÉÛÈÍÎ×ÈÓÏ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÛÉÈÛÊ×ÛÉÅÔ×Ê× ÏÛÒÍÊÉÍÓÐØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ× Impact HAZ-1: ïÛÒÍÊØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÍÖÉÍÓÐÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔÓÉØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÙÍÇÐØÇÎÙÍÆ×ÊÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Ê×ÉÓØÇ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÉÍÓÐÓÖÓÈ×ÄÓÉÈÉÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÙÛÇÉ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÈ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÛÎØÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÉÍÓÐÈ×ÉÈÓÎÕÖÍÊÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Ê×ÉÓØÇ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÏÛÒÍÊÉÍÓÐ ØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÅÓÐÐÍÙÙÇÊÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎóÖÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×ÉÛÊ× Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÖÍÐÐÍÅÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÙÍÎÈÛÏÓÎÛÈ×ØÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÔÛÎØÐÓÎÕÛÎØØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÌÊÓÍÊÈÍ ÛÎØØÇÊÓÎÕÛÎÃÉÍÓÐØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ× Implementation: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØ×ÉÓÕÎ Monitoring: ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 86 Environmental Checklist No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÛÎÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÐÛÎÛÎØÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÅÍÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÇÉ×ÛÓÊÌÍÊÈèÔ×Î×ÛÊ×ÉÈÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÓÉïÍÖÖ×ÈÈö×Ø×ÊÛÐûÓÊ öÓ×ÐØÍÎÈÔ×ÚÍÊØ×ÊÍÖéÇÎÎÃÆÛÐ×ÛÎØïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÉ×Æ×ÎÏÓÐ×ÉÎÍÊÈÔÍÖÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÛÓÊÉÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃ g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÏÌÛÓÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÊÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐÃÓÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê×ÅÓÈÔ ÛÎÛØÍÌÈ×Ø×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÌÐÛÎÍÊ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃ×ÆÛÙÇÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÛÉÊ×ÆÓ×Å×Ø ÚÃÈÔ×öÓÊ×ïÛÊÉÔÛÐÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÉÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ×ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÍÊÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÍÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÊÓÉÑ ÓÎÒÇÊÃÍÊØ×ÛÈÔÓÎÆÍÐÆÓÎÕÅÓÐØÐÛÎØÖÓÊ×ÉèÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍÅÓÐØÐÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÉÅÓÈÔÛÖÓÊ×ÊÓÉÑÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×èÔ×Î×ÛÊ×ÉÈÅÓÐØÐÛÎØÇÊÚÛÎÓÎÈ×ÊÖÛÙ×ÖÓÊ×ÛÊ×ÛÓÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ~ÏÓÐ×Å×ÉÈÛÎØ ÉÍÇÈÔÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 87 Less Less 3.9HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛæÓÍÐÛÈ×ÛÎÃÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ÍÊÅÛÉÈ×ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉý ÚéÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØ×ÌÐ×È×ÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×Ê ÉÇÌÌÐÓ×ÉÍÊÓÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÅÓÈÔ ÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÊ×ÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÇÙÔÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê× ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÎ×ÈØ×ÖÓÙÓÈÓÎÛËÇÓÖ×ÊÆÍÐÇÏ× ÍÊÛÐÍÅ×ÊÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×Ê ÈÛÚÐ×Ð×Æ×Ð×ÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎÊÛÈ×ÍÖ ÌÊ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÎ×ÛÊÚÃÅ×ÐÐÉÅÍÇÐØØÊÍÌÈÍ ÛÐ×Æ×ÐÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÉÍÊÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÇÉ×ÉÖÍÊ ÅÔÓÙÔÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÕÊÛÎÈ×Øý ÙéÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÛÐÈ×ÊÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÍÊÛÊ×Û ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÛÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÙÍÇÊÉ×ÍÖÛÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÊÊÓÆ×ÊÓÎÛ ÏÛÎÎ×ÊÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÍÊÉÓÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÍÊ ÍÖÖÉÓÈ×ý ØéÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÛÐÈ×ÊÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÍÊÛÊ×Û ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÛÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÙÍÇÊÉ×ÍÖÛÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÊÊÓÆ×ÊÍÊ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÊÛÈ×ÍÊ ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÊÇÎÍÖÖÓÎÛÏÛÎÎ×Ê ÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÍÎÍÊ ÍÖÖÉÓÈ×ý ×ùÊ×ÛÈ×ÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÊÇÎÍÖÖÅÛÈ×Ê ÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØ×ÄÙ××ØÈÔ×ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×Ê ØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÍÊÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÖ ÌÍÐÐÇÈ×ØÊÇÎÍÖÖý ÖíÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØ×ÕÊÛØ× ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃý ÕìÐÛÙ×ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÓÎÛ Ã×ÛÊ ÖÐÍÍØÔÛÂÛÊØÛÊ×ÛÛÉÏÛÌÌ×ØÍÎÛ Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐöÐÍÍØôÛÂÛÊØúÍÇÎØÛÊÃÍÊ öÐÍÍØóÎÉÇÊÛÎÙ×êÛÈ×ïÛÌÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ÖÐÍÍØÔÛÂÛÊØØ×ÐÓÎ×ÛÈÓÍÎÏÛÌý ÔìÐÛÙ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÛ Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÍØÔÛÂÛÊØ ÛÊ×ÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÓÏÌ×Ø×ÍÊ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 88 Environmental Checklist Less Less Ê×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÖÐÍÍØÖÐÍÅÉý Ó÷ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÍÊÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÍÛ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÊÓÉÑÍÖÐÍÉÉÓÎÒÇÊÃÍÊØ×ÛÈÔ ÓÎÆÍÐÆÓÎÕÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÛÉ ÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×ÖÛÓÐÇÊ×ÍÖÛÐ×Æ××ÍÊ ØÛÏý ÒóÎÇÎØÛÈÓÍÎÚÃÉ×ÓÙÔ×ÈÉÇÎÛÏÓÍÊ ÏÇØÖÐÍÅý Environmental Setting èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÉÐÍÌ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÊÇÂ ïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÉÓÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÅ×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ× ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×Ø×ÎÙÍÏÌÛÉÉ×ÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÉËÇÛÊ×ÏÓÐ×ÉÛÈÓÈÉÍÇÈÐ×ÈÈÍÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃ ÛÎØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÛÏÓÄÈÇÊ×ÍÖÇÊÚÛÎÓÂ×ØÛÎØÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÔÛÉÚ××ÎÛÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×Ø ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÓÎÙ× ÅÔ×ÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÅÛÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÛÎØÓÈÓÉÎÍÅÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ØÚÃ ÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈèÔ×Ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÔÍÐØÉ ÛÙÊ×Ö××ÈÍÖÅÛÈ×Ê ÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÖÛÙÊ×ÉÅÔ×ÎÖÇÐÐèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÇÌÌ×ÊÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÍÖ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÏÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÖÊÍÎÈÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÅÍÛÎØÛÔÛÐÖÏÓÐ×ÉØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏÈÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÚ×ÈÅ××ÎïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÍÛØÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑÊÇÎÉÈÔ×Ð×ÎÕÈÔÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×çÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÎÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÊÇÂ ïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÉÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÓÉÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÎÍÎÇÊÚÛÎÓÂ×Ø éÇÊÖÛÙ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÈÓÎÕÓÎÍÊÌÛÉÉÓÎÕÈÔÊÍÇÕÔùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÇÐÈÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÓÎÈÍ éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃêÇÎÍÖÖÓÉÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÓÎÛÎÇÎØ×ÊÕÊÍÇÎØÉÈÍÊÏØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÈÔÛÈ ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃèÔ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÅûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÉÎÍÈÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÛØ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÉÈÇØÃÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉÓÎÙ× ÓÈÓÉÛÉÉÇÏ×ØÈÔÛÈÓÈÙÍÇÐØÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÊÇÎÍÖÖÖÊÍÏÛ Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÅÍÊÔÓÕÔ×ÊÅÓÈÔÉÍÏ× ÍÆ×ÊÖÐÍÅÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÉÈÊ××ÈÕÇÈÈ×ÊÉÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÇÐÈÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃØÓÉÉÓÌÛÈ×ÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÉÈÍÊÏØÊÛÓÎÛÕ× ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÉÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×Û Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÅ ÙÐÓÏÛÈÓÙÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÊ×ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÂ×ØÚÃÅÛÊÏØÊÃÉÇÏÏ×ÊÉÛÎØÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃ ÙÍÍÐÅ×ÈÅÓÎÈ×ÊÉèÔ×Ã×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×È×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ÓÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃöÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÍÊÏÛÐ ÛÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÓÎÖÛÐÐÅÔÓÙÔÍÙÙÇÊÉÏÍÉÈÐÃØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÖÊÍÏíÙÈÍÚ×ÊÈÍïÛÃÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐðÛÎØçÉ×ÛÎØéÈÊ×ÛÏùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ û×ÊÓÛÐÌÔÍÈÍÕÊÛÌÔÉÖÊÍÏÛÎØ ÛÎØÈÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÏÛÌÉÖÊÍÏ ÛÎØ Å×Ê×ÇÉ×ØÈÍÛÉÉ×ÉÉÌÍÉÈÉ×ÈÈÐ×Ï×ÎÈÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÈÈÔ× ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×èÔ×ØÍÏÓÎÛÎÈÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉ ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× ÉÅÛÉÍÊÙÔÛÊØÉ èÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÌÐÛÎÖÍÊÏÔÍÅÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÖÊÍÏÛÚÍÆ×ÔÛÉÊ×ÏÛÓÎ×ØÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃ ÉÈÛÚÐ×ÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ× ÉðÓÈÈÐ×ÈÍÎÍÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÐÛÊÕ×ÉÙÛÐ×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÏ×ÛÎØ×ÊÙÇÈÍÖÖÉÍÊ ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ×ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÊ×ÛÌÌÛÊ×ÎÈôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÉÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØÙÔÛÎÕ×É ÈÍÔÇÏÛÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÛÈÈÅÍÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÚÍÈÔÓÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÅÔ×ÎÙÍÏÌÛÊÓÎÕÈÔ× ÛÎØ Û×ÊÓÛÐÌÔÍÈÍÕÊÛÌÔÉÛÎØÈÔ× ÈÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÏÛÌùÔÛÎÎ×Ð City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 89 ÛÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÆ×ÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÓÎÈÔ×Ê×Ù×ÎÈÌÛÉÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈÈÔ×Ð×ÎÕÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÈÔ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÊÓÌÊÛÌÛÎØÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÛÎÑÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖ ùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖ ÈÔÊ××ÐÍÅÖÐÍÅÊÍÛØÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÉÛÎØÛØÓÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎØÛÏÓÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØ ÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÉóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÆ×Ê ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÇÌÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÓÎÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÊ×Û ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈÊ×ÛÏùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ Channel Conditions é×Æ×ÊÛÐÉÓÈ×Ê×ÙÍÎÎÛÓÉÉÛÎÙ×ÆÓÉÓÈÉÅ×Ê×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÚÃúÛÐÛÎÙ×ôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÓÙÉúÛÐÛÎÙ× ÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÍÖ ÈÍËÇÛÐÓÈÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÛÉÉ×ÉÉÉÈÊ×ÛÏ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÓÎìÔÛÉ× åÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÉÓÈ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃ×ÄÔÓÚÓÈÉÛ Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÉÈÛÚÐ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÌÐÛÎÖÍÊÏÓ×ÉÔÛÌ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÅÔ×ÎÆÓ×Å×ØÖÊÍÏÛÚÍÆ×ÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔ ÚÛÎÑ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÔÛÉÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÛÈÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÎØ ÍÖÚÛÎÑÓÉÇÎØ×ÊÙÇÈÛÈÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉïÍÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÅÔ×Ê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÉ Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑÉÓÎÉÍÏ×ÙÛÉ×ÉÚÃÉÈÍÊÏÖÐÍÅÉÍÊÖÐÍÍØ×Æ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÓÉÎÍÅ Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÚÃÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÊÓÌÊÛÌÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉóÎÙÓÉ×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉ ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×É×ÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖÚÛÎÑÉÍÖÖ×ÊÆ×ÊÃÐÓÈÈÐ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÉÛÐÏÍÎÓØÉÍÊÈ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×óÎÛÊ×ÛÉÖÊ×× ÍÖÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÐÓÎÓÎÕÛÎØÏÛÎÏÛØ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚ×ØÔÛÉÛÏÍÊ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÌÊÍÖÓÐ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÉÈ××Ì×ÊÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÊÓÖÖÐ×ÉÊÛÌÓØÉÛÎØÏÍÊ×Õ×ÎÈÐ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÌÍÍÐÉ ùÔÛÎÎ×ÐùÍÊÊÓØÍÊôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÃ ùÊ××ÑÖÐÍÅÉÛÊ×Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÅÔÓÙÔÊ×ÈÛÓÎÉÐÍÅÛÎØ ÏÍØ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÈÍÊÏÖÐÍÅÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÌÛÊÈÍÖ×ÛÙÔÅÓÎÈ×ÊêÇÎÍÖÖÖÊÍÏÐÛÈ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÉÈÍÊÏÉÛÎØÐÛÊÕ× ÖÐÍÍØ×Æ×ÎÈÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÌÛÉÉ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×Ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÊÛÌÓØÐÃØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÉÈÍÊÛÕ×ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃ ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÏÛÄÓÏÓÂ×ØÚÃÐÛÈ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊåÓÎÈ×ÊÚÛÉ×ÖÐÍÅÉîÍÆ×ÏÚ×ÊÈÔÊÍÇÕÔûÌÊÓÐÈÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃ ÊÛÎÕ×ÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ ÙÇÚÓÙÖ××ÈÌ×ÊÉ×ÙÍÎØÙÖÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÙÈÓÆ×ÊÛÓÎÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÅÔÓÐ×ÉÇÏÏ×Ê ÚÛÉ×ÖÐÍÅÉïÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔíÙÈÍÚ×ÊÛÊ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÙÖÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÖÐÍÅØÛÈÛÖÊÍÏÈÔ× ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÕÛÕ×ÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑøÛÏõÛÕ×îÍ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ûÎÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÐ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÛÈÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÓÙÈ×ØÌÍÓÎÈÎ×ÛÊ ÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔ×ÎØÍÖÈÔ×ÈÔÖÛÓÊÅÛÃÓÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÍ ÙÖÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÚÛÉ×ØÍÎ ÍÚÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÚÃúÛÐÛÎÙ×ôÃØÊÍÐÍÕÓÙÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÈÍÊÏÉÛÎØÔÓÕÔÖÐÍÅÉÈÔÛÈÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÓÎïÛÊÙÔ èÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÔÛÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÖÐÍÅÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÒÇÉÈÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÓÉÎÍÅ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÙÖÉöÐÍÅÉ×ÄÙ××ØÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÆÛÐÇ×ÍÆ×ÊÈÍÌÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÛÎÑÉÓÎÇÎØÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ× ÇÌÌ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎèÔ××ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÅÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÛÙÔÓÉ ÙÖÉ èÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÖÐÍÅÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÒÇÉÈÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÓÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÅÛÉ ×ÄÙ××Ø×ØÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÈÓÏ×ÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÛÉÈÃ×ÛÊÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕØÇÊÓÎÕÅÛÈ×ÊÃ×ÛÊÉ ÛÎØÛÈÖÐÍÅÊÛÈ×ÉÍÖÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ ÙÖÉ ÙÖÉ ÙÖÉ ÙÖÉ ÙÖÉÛÎØ ÙÖÉÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃ Regional Ground Water èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÇÎÙÍÎÖÓÎ×ØÛËÇÓÖ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×Ã éÇÚÚÛÉÓÎÛÎØÉ×ÊÆ×ÉÛÉÛÊ×ÙÔÛÊÕ×ÛÊ×ÛÖÍÊÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÌÌÐÃÛËÇÓÖ×ÊÉèÔ×éÛÎÈÛ ùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃéÇÚÚÛÉÓÎÔÛÉÛÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÖ ÉËÇÛÊ×ÏÓÐ×ÉÅÓÈÔÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖ ÛÙÊ×Ö××ÈÍÖÅÛÈ×ÊÛÎØ×ÄÈ×ÎØÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÍÃÍÈ×îÛÊÊÍÅÉÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÊÎùÍÇÎÈÃ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÚÍÇÎØ×ØÍÎÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÃÈÔ×øÓÛÚÐÍêÛÎÕ×ÛÎØÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÃÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÊÇÂ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 90 Environmental Checklist ïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÉèÔ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÕÊÛØÓ×ÎÈÓÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ××ØÕ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÉÇÚÚÛÉÓÎÈÍÅÛÊØÈÔ× éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÊÍÇÕÔÐÃÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÈÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÃ èÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÉÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÛÎØÉ××ÑÉÈÍÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÉÈÍÊÛÕ×ÚÃ ÇÉÓÎÕÊ×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÉÌ×ÊÙÍÐÛÈÓÍÎÌÍÎØÉÛÎØÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÖÍÊÊ×ÙÔÛÊÕ×ïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÚÃ ÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÔÍÅÉÈÔÛÈÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÉÈÍÊÛÕ×ÓÎÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃéÇÚÚÛÉÓÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÚÃ ÈÍ ÛÙÊ×Ö××ÈÓÎ ÛÎØÚÃ ÈÍ ÛÙÊ×Ö××ÈÓÎ øÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Ã×ÛÊÉ ÛÎØ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÙÊ×Ö××ÈÍÖÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÓÉ×ÄÈÊÛÙÈ×Ø×ÛÙÔÃ×ÛÊÖÍÊ ÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÛÎØÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÏÛÎÛÕ×ØÚÃÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÏÛÎÛÕ×ØÊ×ÙÔÛÊÕ×ÈÍÈÔ×Ø××ÌÛËÇÓÖ×ÊØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ØÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛ æÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ Regulatory Setting èÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÈÛÈ×åÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØéåêùúÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÓÎ×ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØÉêåëùúÉÔÛÆ×ÈÔ×ÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÓÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÚÍÈÔÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÓÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÈÔ×Ð×ÛØÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÓÎÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÎÍÎÌÍÓÎÈÉÍÇÊÙ×ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ö×Ø×ÊÛÐùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈÛÎØÖÊÍÏÈÔ× ÌÊÓÏÛÊÃÅÛÈ×ÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ìÍÊÈ×ÊùÍÐÍÕÎ×ûÙÈèÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃ êåëùúê×ÕÓÍÎ ÍÖÖÓÙ×ÕÇÓØ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ÉÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÛÎØÛËÇÓÖ×ÊÉÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÎÓÎ×ÙÍÇÎÈÓ×ÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ Ú×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÇÉ×É×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÏ×ÎÈÍÖÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÉÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ìÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎøÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×÷ÐÓÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎéÃÉÈ×Ïîìø÷éÌ×ÊÏÓÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÖÍÊÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊÛÎØ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÊÇÎÍÖÖÛÎØé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÙ×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÔ×Ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎ ÖÓÐÐÍÖÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÍÊÅÛÈ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×çé èÔ×ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉÈÍÈÔ×ùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈáé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÌßÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÖÍÊçé ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÕ×ÎÙÃçé÷ìûÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÎ×ÅÙÛÈ×ÕÍÊÓ×ÉÍÖÎÍÎÌÍÓÎÈ ÌÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕîìø÷éÌÊÍÕÊÛÏìÔÛÉ×óÍÖÈÔ×ÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊÊÇÎÍÖÖÌÊÍÕÊÛÏ Ê×ÐÓ×ØÍÎîìø÷éÌ×ÊÏÓÈÙÍÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÈÍÛØØÊ×ÉÉÇÊÚÛÎÊÇÎÍÖÖØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÖÊÍÏÇÏÈÍ ÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÉ×ÌÛÊÛÈ×ÉÈÍÊÏÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉïéÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÙÓÈÓ×ÉÍÊÙÍÇÎÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖ ÍÊÏÍÊ×ÖÊÍÏÌÐÛÎÈÉÓÎÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓ×ÉÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ØÚÃÈÔ×çé÷ìûÛÉÚ×ÓÎÕÐÓÑ×ÐÃÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÍÖÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊÌÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉÛÎØÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈØÓÉÈÇÊÚÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÖÓÆ×ÛÙÊ×ÉèÔ× çé÷ìûÔÛÉØ×Ð×ÕÛÈ×ØÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖîìø÷éÌ×ÊÏÓÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÈÍÈÔ×éåêùú ÛÎØÈÔ×êåëùúèÔ×ìÔÛÉ×óóöÓÎÛÐêÇÐ×ÅÔÓÙÔÈÍÍÑ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎïÛÊÙÔ ×ÄÈ×ÎØ×Ø Ì×ÊÏÓÈÙÍÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÈÍÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ØïéÉÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈØÓÉÈÇÊÚÍÎ×ÍÊ ÏÍÊ×ÛÙÊ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÉÏÛÐÐ×ÊÉÓÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÐÛÊÕ×ÊÙÍÏÏÍÎÌÐÛÎÍÖØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÊ ÉÛÐ× öÍÊÈÔÍÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÍÖÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÍÎ×ÛÙÊ×ÍÖÐÛÎØØÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÉÍÖÈÔÍÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÊ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÛÌÌÐÃÖÍÊÙÍÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ× îìø÷éùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎûÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÚÃÉÇÚÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛîÍÈÓÙ×ÍÖóÎÈ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×éÈÛÈ× úÍÛÊØûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×É×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××ÎØ×Ð×ÕÛÈ×ØÈÍÙÓÈÓ×ÉÙÍÇÎÈÓ×ÉÍÊÈÔ× êåëùúÉÚÇÈÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éåêùú éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐìÐÛÎ óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×îìø÷éÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÈÔ×êåëùúÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ÉÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÎÈÔ× úÛÃûÊ×ÛÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐìÐÛÎúÛÉÓÎìÐÛÎèÔ×úÛÉÓÎìÐÛÎ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉÈÔ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×êåëùúÔÛÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÖÍÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉ ÛËÇÓÖ×ÊÉÛÎØÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÉÛÎØÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÈÔÛÈÏÇÉÈÚ×Ï×ÈÈÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÔ×É×ÇÉ×ÉèÔ×úÛÉÓÎìÐÛÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ÉÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ù×ÎÈÊÛÐ éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÛÍÙ×ÛÎÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÛÎØÉÌÍÊÈÖÓÉÔÓÎÕÚ×ÉÈÇÛÊÓÎ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 91 ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÇÌÌÐÃØÖÓÉÔÏÓÕÊÛÈÓÍÎ×ÎÛÆÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÖÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÊÛÊ×ÛÎØ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÕÎÍÎÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÅÛÈ×ÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÔÉÔ×ÐÐÖÓÉÔÔÛÊÆ×ÉÈÓÎÕÓÖÓÉÔÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÒÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÍÊÏÊÇÎÍÖÖÅÍÇÐØÚ×ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ØÈÍÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊØÊÛÓÎÛÕ× ÉÇÚÉ×ËÇ×ÎÈÐÃÈÍéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃ ìÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎù ïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐéÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×Êì×ÊÏÓÈ èÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃçÊÚÛÎêÇÎÍÖÖìÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎìÊ×Æ×ÎÈÓÍÎìÊÍÕÊÛÏéùæçêìììÛ ÙÍÎÉÍÊÈÓÇÏÍÖÈÔÓÊÈ××ÎÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÓÈÓ×ÉéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÛÎØÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×Ê øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÛÉÖÓÊÉÈÓÉÉÇ×ØÛÙÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×îìø÷éÌ×ÊÏÓÈÓÎ ÛÎØÊ×ÓÉÉÇ×ØÏÍÉÈÊ×Ù×ÎÈÐÃÓÎ ÈÔÛÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÈÔ×ÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÍÖÛÎçÊÚÛÎêÇÎÍÖÖïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÐÛÎÛÎØÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎ ÓÎÇÊÚÛÎÊÇÎÍÖÖÈÍÈÔ×ÇÏ×ÄÈ×ÎÈÌÊÛÙÈÓÙÛèÔ×ù ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×Ê×Ù×ÎÈÐÃ ÛÏ×ÎØ×Øîìø÷éÌ×ÊÏÓÈÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÉÈÔ×É×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÚÃÊ×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕÛÐÐÎ×ÅÛÎØ Ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÍÊÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÓÏÌ×ÊÆÓÍÇÉÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÉÈÍÈÛÐÓÎÕ ÉËÖÈÍÊÏÍÊ×ÈÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÈÊ×ÛÈÛÎÍÌÈÓÏÛÐÆÍÐÇÏ×ÍÊÖÐÍÅÍÖÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊÊÇÎÍÖÖÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ÛÎØ ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÐÃÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ØÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø éÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÐÛÊÕ×ÊÈÔÛÎÍÎ×ÛÙÊ×ÓÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÛéÈÍÊÏåÛÈ×ÊìÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎìÊÍÕÊÛÏéåìììóÈÅÓÐÐÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÛéÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÐÛÎéåïìÓÖÓÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×É ÉËÇÛÊ×Ö××ÈÍÖÎ×ÅÍÊÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÓÏÌ×ÊÆÓÍÇÉÉÇÊÖÛÙÓÎÕÌ×ÊÈÔ×Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ× ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅÓÐÐÍÆ×ÊÉ××ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ× Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊÈÔ×É×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉ Discussion: Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact. ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉ ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÚÃÐÛÃÓÎÕÚÛÙÑÛÎØ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈÚÛÎÑÛÎØ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÎÕÛÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÍÖÖÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑèÔ×Î×ÅÐÃ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈ×ØÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÅÓÐÐÚ×É×ÙÇÊ×ØÅÓÈÔÚÍÇÐØ×ÊÈÍ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÛ ÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÐÍÕÒÛÏÖÓÉÔÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÇÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×È×ÙÔÎÓËÇ×ÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×ÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÐÃ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÓÎìÔÛÉ×ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÓÎ èÔ×É×ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÐÐÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÛÎÍÚÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÖÓÉÔÌÛÉÉÛÕ×ÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊ Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÛÎØÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉèÔ×Î×ÅÐÃÙÊ×ÛÈ×Ø ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÛÎØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊ××ÙÛÎÍÌÃÓÎÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÌÐÛÎÈ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÅÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÛÉÅÛÉØÍÎ×ÓÎìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×É× Î×ÅÌÐÛÎÈÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÙÍÈÈÍÎÅÍÍØÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÖÍÊ×ÉÈÛÎØÍÛÑÅÍÍØÐÛÎØÉÌ×ÙÓ×É èÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÛÊ×ÛÈÍÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛÙÊ×ÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕ ÅÍÇÐØÔ×ÐÌ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÛÎÃÉÐÍÌ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔÓÉÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ× ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÍÊÈÇÊÚÓØÓÈÃèÔÓÉÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÍÇÐØÊ×ØÇÙ×ÊÓÉÑÍÖ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÖÊÍÏÈÔ×Î×ÅÐÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø ÚÛÎÑÉèÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÅÍÊÑÅÓÐÐÚ×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ØÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÎØ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÏÍÇÎÈÉÍÖ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÈÇÊÚÓØÓÈÃÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÊ×ÈÍ ÍÙÙÇÊ èÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÖÛÓÐÓÎÕÊÓÌÊÛÌÕÇÎÓÈ×ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÐÓÎÓÎÕìÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÐÓÎÓÎÕÔÛÆ×ÙÍÐÐÛÌÉ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕÉÙÍÇÊ ÛÎØÛÆ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐØÊÍÌèÔÓÉÆ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐØÊÍÌÔÛÉÅÍÊÉ×Î×ØÛÎØÓÉÎÍÅÚ×ÐÓ×Æ×ØÈÍÚ×ÐÓÏÓÈÓÎÕÒÇÆ×ÎÓÐ× ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÏÏ×ÊÖÐÍÅÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕÔÛÚÓÈÛÈé××öÓÕÇÊ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 92 Environmental Checklist éÓÈ×ìÔÍÈÍÉÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÉÏÛÐÐ×ÊÉÓÂ× ÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÈÔÊ××ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÖÓÉÔÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÎÔÛÚÓÈÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑèÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐ Ê×ÏÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÖÛÓÐÓÎÕÔÛÊØÉÙÛÌ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÛÎØÙÊ×ÛÈ×Ø××ÌÌÍÍÐÛÎØÊÓÖÖÐ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÕÊÛÆ×ÐÚ×ØÉ ÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÌÛÅÎÓÎÕÛÎØÅÓÐÐÛØØÐÛÊÕ×ÅÍÍØÃØ×ÚÊÓÉÛÎØÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÊ×ÛÊÓÎÕ óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×Ê×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÎÈÓÍÎÛÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎú×ÉÈ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÖÍÊ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØÉ×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÉÎ××Ø×Ø èÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÉÓÐÈÖ×ÎÙÓÎÕÍÊÖÓÚ×ÊÊÍÐÐÉÛÈÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÊ××Ñ ÚÛÎÑÉÈÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÍÖÊÇÎÍÖÖÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÛÉÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÈÔ×éåìììÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÚÃÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÛÊÈÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎûÎÍÈÔ×Ê ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎúïìÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÍÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÖÓÚ×Ê×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÖÛÚÊÓÙÍÎÉÓØ× ÉÐÍÌ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉèÔÓÉ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÖÛÚÊÓÙ ÅÍÇÐØÔ×ÐÌÅÓÈÔÉÈÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÖÐÍÅÉÅÔÓÐ×Î×ÅÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÓÉ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÓÎÕûØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÉÇÓÈ×ÍÖúïìÉ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÇÉ×ØÈÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÅÔ×ÎÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈ ÓÉÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÈÊ×ÛÏÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÎØÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÉÖÐÍÅÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÈÓÏ×ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø úïìÉÛÊ×ÖÍÇÎØÓÎûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÍÖÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ èÔ×Î×ÅÚÊÓØÕ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÈÍÚ×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÛÎØÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÊÓØÕ×ÈÍÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÚÛÎÑÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÛÊ×ÛÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÉ ìÔÛÉ×èÔÓÉ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÊÓØÕ×ÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÓÉÛÙÐ×ÛÊÉÌÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÏÛØ×ÍÖÌÛÓÎÈ×ØÉÈ××Ð ÅÓÈÔÛÅÍÍØÌÐÛÎÑØ×ÙÑÛÎØÛÎÓÎÉÓØ×ÅÓØÈÔÍÖÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈ×ÎÖ××È øÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÎÍÌÍÉÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÉÇ×ÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍ ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÛÊ×ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØûÉÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÉÈÛÈ×ØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ÛéåìììÛÎØ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÛéåïìèÔ×É×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÅÛÈ×Ê ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØîÍÎìÍÓÎÈéÍÇÊÙ×îìéÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÌ×ÊÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ åÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØéöêåëùúÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ï×È b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (for example, the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Beneficial Effect. èÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÐÃ ÈÔ×ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÅ×ÈÐÛÎØÛÎØÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÙÍÎÙÊ×È×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÅÓÈÔ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ×ÛÊÈÔÚÛÎÑÉÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÊ×ÙÔÛÊÕ×èÔÓÉÓÉÛÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÖ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÛÐÈ×Ê×ØÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÍÊÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÉÐÓÕÔÈ ÛÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÚÛÎÑÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÖÛÓÐÓÎÕÚÛÎÑÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÐÐÚ×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÛÉÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÖÊÍÏÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÙÖÉÈÍÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÙÖÉ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÈÔ×ÚÊÍÛØ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÈÔÛÈØ×ÖÓÎ×ÉÈÔ×ÆÛÐÐ×ÃÖÐÍÍÊ ÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÍÖÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÛÊ×ÛÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÛÐÈ×Ê×Ø óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÍÊÉÓÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÍÊ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 93 ÍÖÖÉÓÈ×Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×úïìÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÉÇÙÔÛÉÇÉÓÎÕ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÖÛÚÊÓÙÍÎ ÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÉÐÍÌ×ÉÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ØÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ×ÖÖÍÊÈÉÛÎØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÊ×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔÓÉÊ×ÛÙÔ ÈÍÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÙÖÉûÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈ ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÖÉÓÈ××ÓÈÔ×ÊÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ êÍÛØÍÊØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÖÐÍÅ×Æ×ÎÈûÉÓØ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ× ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÎÍÎ×ÅÌÛÆ×ØÍÊÔÛÊØ×Î×ØÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊØÇ×ÈÍÓÈÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÛÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØ ÙÐÍÉ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕ×Æ×ÎÈÉèÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈ×Ø ÖÊÍÏÔ×ÛÆÃÖÐÍÍØÖÐÍÅÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÈÍÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÈÍ ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÔÇÏÛÎÉÛÖ×ÈÃ óÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÖÐÍÍØ×Æ×ÎÈÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØÙÐÍÉ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÎØÅÍÇÐØ ÌÍÉÈÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÛÈÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÍÛØÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÌÛÊÑÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐ ×ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÉÛÐ×ÊÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÙÐÍÉÇÊ× èÔÓÉÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÓÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÓÎÌÐÛÙ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÍÌ×ÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××Ñ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈ ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÖÉÓÈ××ÓÈÔ×ÊÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ êÍÛØÍÊØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏÖÊÍÏéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÖÐÍÅ×Æ×ÎÈûÉÓØ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ× ÏÓÐ××ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÎÍÎ×ÅÌÛÆ×ØÍÊÔÛÊØ×Î×ØÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐ ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛéåìììÛÎØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÛéåïìèÔ×É×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÅÓÐÐØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÔÍÅ ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ØÈÍÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍØÍÅÎÉÈÊ×ÛÏ Æ×ÎÇ×ÉÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÖÉÈÍÊÏÊÇÎÍÖÖØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÛÎØ×ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÛÎØÚÓÍÈ×ÙÔÎÓÙÛÐÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÛÎØÏ×ÈÔÍØÉÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×Ø ÉÔÛØÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÚÃÎ×ÅÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÉÇÏÏ×ÊÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×ÊÓÉ×ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎ ÈÔ×ÔÃØÊÛÇÐÓÙÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÈÍÛÎÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÙÖÉÛÎØÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÉÙÍÇÊÛÎØ Æ×ÊÈÓÙÛÐØÊÍÌÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 94 Environmental Checklist h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact. éÓÎÙ×ÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÉÓÈ×ÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÍØÔÛÂÛÊØ ÛÊ×ÛÉÈÔ×Î×ÅÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔÓÉ Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÍØÂÍÎ×ôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÏÌ×Ø×ÍÊÊ×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÖÐÍÍØÖÐÍÅÉÓÎÛÏÛÎÎ×ÊÅÔÓÙÔÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐÃØÓÖÖ×ÊÉ ÖÊÍÏÈÔÛÈÅÔÓÙÔÍÙÙÇÊÉÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÙÐ×ÛÊÉÌÛÎÚÊÓØÕ×ÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÅÓÈÔÛÚÇÈÏ×ÎÈÉÍÊÖÍÍÈÓÎÕÉÉ×ÈÚÛÙÑÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Ö××È ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÇÌÌ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÖÍÍÈÓÎÕÅÓØÈÔÛÎØÚÊÓØÕ×ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈÓÍÎ Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÛÆÍÓØÍÚÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÎÕÍÆ×ÊÚÛÎÑÖÐÍÅèÔ×ÚÊÓØÕ×ÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÉÐÓÕÔÈÐÃÛÊÙÔ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÙÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ×ÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÊÖÛÙ×èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÊÓØÕ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÅÍÇÐØÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ× ÈÔ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÚ× ÙÖÉÛÎØÅÓÐÐÛÐÐÍÅÖÍÊÈÔ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÙÓÛÐÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ× ÓÎÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÏÍÊ×ÊÓÉÑÉÍÖ ÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÅÓÐÐ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÉÈÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÇÉÓÎÕÈÔÓÉ ÏÓÐ×ÈÊÛÓÐ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎØÇÊÓÎÕÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÖÐÍÍØ×Æ×ÎÈÉ èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÍÅÎ×ØÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×Ø ÚÃÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈóÎÈÔ×Ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÅÛÉÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐÐÃÉ×ÓÉÏÓÙÛÐÐÃÊ×ÈÊÍÖÓÈÈ×ØÈÍÏ××ÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÌÇÈÖÍÊÈÔÚÃÈÔ×øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÍÖøÛÏéÛÖ×ÈÃèÔ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×ÇÈÓÐÓÂ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ× Ê×ÈÊÍÖÓÈÅÛÉÛÎ ×ÛÊÈÔËÇÛÑ×Ù×ÎÈ×Ê×ØÍÎÈÔ×éÛÎûÎØÊ×ÛÉÖÛÇÐÈÂÍÎ×ÛÎØÔÛÉÚ××ÎÏÍØ×Ð×Ø ÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×É×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÎÍÙÛÈÛÉÈÊÍÌÔÓÙÖÛÓÐÇÊ×èÔ×Ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÔÛÉÛÈÍÈÛÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃ ÍÖ ÛÙÊ×Ö××ÈÍÖÅÛÈ×ÊèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÎÃÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔ×ØÛÏÛÎØ ÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÈÔ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÊÓÉÑÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏÊ×É×ÊÆÍÓÊèÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ð×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÛÊ×ÛÈÔÛÈÓÉÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÓÎÇÎØÛÈÓÍÎÚÃÉ×ÓÙÔ× ÈÉÇÎÛÏÓÍÊÏÇØÖÐÍÅ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 95 Less Less 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛìÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐÃØÓÆÓØ×ÛÎ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃý ÚùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÃÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÐÛÎØÇÉ× ÌÐÛÎÌÍÐÓÙÃÍÊÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎÛÕ×ÎÙÃ ÅÓÈÔÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÍÆ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÌÐÛÎÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÌÐÛÎÐÍÙÛÐÙÍÛÉÈÛÐ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÍÊÂÍÎÓÎÕÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÛÆÍÓØÓÎÕÍÊ ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÎÕÛÎ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈý ÙùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÃÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÍÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎý Environmental Setting èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÂÍÎ×ØûûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉ ÂÍÎ×ØìêìÇÚÐÓÙìÛÊÑÍÊê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÂÍÎÓÎÕÏÛÌùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ× ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÂÍÎ×ØéÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØéÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐùÐÇÉÈ×ÊûÉÓÎÕÐ×ÖÛÏÓÐÃÔÍÏ××ÄÓÉÈÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØ éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÎÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÛÈÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÔÛÉÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖÈÔÊ××Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉ ÈÔÛÈÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ ÈÔ×ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ ìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÎØ ÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ èÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÉÍÖÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÖÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÚÐ× ûøûÉÌÛÙ×ÉèÔ×ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÔÛÉ ÉÈÊÓÌ×ØÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÉÌÔÛÐÈ ÍÖ ÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ûøûÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÎØÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÖÍÊÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÌÛÙ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎÇÎÉÈÊÓÌ×ØÛÊ×Û ôÚÛÊÎÉÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÛÎûøûÉÌÛÙ×èÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈ Ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É Discussion: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐÃØÓÆÓØ×ÛÎ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃèÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÛÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ØÕ×ÍÖ ÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèÔÓÉÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈØÓÆÓØ×ÛÎ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃî×ÅÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÔ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÚÇÉÌÇÐÐÍÇÈÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÛÎØÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÍÈÔ×ÊÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈØÓÆÓØ×ÈÔ× ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØ×ØÚÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÛÎØÌÇÚÐÓÙÏ××ÈÓÎÕÉ Å×Ê×Ô×ÐØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÈÍÕÛÈÔ×ÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÓÎÌÇÈÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÛÎØÈÍ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 96 Environmental Checklist ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÉÅ×Ê×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈØÓÆÓØ×ÈÔ× ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÇÏ×ÊÍÇÉö×Ø×ÊÛÐéÈÛÈ×ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØðÍÙÛÐÌÐÛÎÉÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÛÎØ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÛÌÌÐÃÈÍÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÚÃÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×É ÉÇÏÏÛÊÓÂ×ØÓÎèÛÚÐ× èÔ×Ê×ÆÓ×ÅÚÃÈÔ×É×ÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÅÓÐÐ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÓÊÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ Table 3.10-1. Applicable Regulations for the Stevens Creek Corridor Project Regulatory AgencyPermit/Certification/Consistency çéûÊÏÃùÍÊÌÉÍÖ ö×Ø×ÊÛÐîÛÈÓÍÎÅÓØ×ùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØì×ÊÏÓÈ ÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÉçéûù÷ îíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×Éé×ÊÆÓÙ×÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈé×ÙÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ îíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×É éÈÛÈ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖé×ÙÈÓÍÎ éÈÊ×ÛÏÚ×ØûÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ öÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×ùøöõ éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃì×ÊÏÓÈ ùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐìÍÐÐÇÈÓÍÎøÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×÷ÐÓÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎéÃÉÈ×Ïîìø÷é éöúêåëùú ì×ÊÏÓÈ ðÍÙÛÐéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊòÍÓÎÈçÉ×ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÛÎØÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈéùæåø÷ÎÙÊÍÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎì×ÊÏÓÈ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÓØ×ì×ÊÏÓÈ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÊ×ÆÓ×Å ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÛÎÓÈÛÊÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍéÛÎÓÈÛÊÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ÆÓ×Å Local Regulations éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ èÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÉÛÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÛÕ×ÎÙÃÅÓÈÔÛúÍÛÊØÙÍÏÌÍÉ×ØÍÖÖÓÆ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙÐÃ×Ð×ÙÈ×ØÛÎØÈÅÍÛÌÌÍÓÎÈ×ØøÓÊ×ÙÈÍÊÉÛÎØÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÈÍÐ×ÆÃÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÉÈÍÖÇÎØÓÈÉ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÓÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÓÎØ×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÐÍÙÛÐÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔ×ÙÓÈÓ×É ÛÎØÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÍÖéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛèÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÔÛÆ×ÈÔ×ÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÈÍØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÈÔ× ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÇÎÈÃÍÊÙÓÈÓ×É×Æ×ÎÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÃÏÛÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊ ÖÐÍÍØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ûÐÐÙÊ××ÑÉÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÛÎØÖÐÍÍØÅÛÃÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÚÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈ ÈÍÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÚÇÈÈÔ×ÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÈÍÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÏÛÃ Ú×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÍÅÎ×ÊÉÔÓÌ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÊÊÓÕÔÈÈÍÛÙÙ×ÉÉèÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÍÅÎÉ ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÛÖ××ÉÓÏÌÐ×ÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÎ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÈÔ×ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÊÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÛÃÍÎ ÙÊ××ÑÆÛÊÓ×ÉÕÊ×ÛÈÐÃðÛÎØÊÓÕÔÈÉÍÎÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÓÎÙÐÇØ× Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÈÔ× ÚÛÎÑíÎÏÍØÓÖÓ×ØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉÊÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÛÃÓÉÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÖ××ÈÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 97 ÊÍÛØèÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÛÎØÊÓÕÔÈÉÍÆ×ÊÓÈÉÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÌÌÐÃÛÎØ ÙÍÎÆ×ÃÛÎÙ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÙÛÎÛÐÉèÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÎØÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ×ÎÈ×Ê×ØÓÎÈÍÛ ÙÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ×ÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎùÊ××Ñê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎòÇÐÃ ÛÎØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔÛÈ ×Ä×ÙÇÈ×ØÛòÍÓÎÈçÉ×ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÓÎ çÎØ×ÊÈÔ×åÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÎ×ÎÙÊÍÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÖÍÊÛÎÃÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÎÍÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÛøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈöÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÍÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ÷ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÍÊÇÉ×ÍÖÛÎÃÉÇÙÔ öÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÍÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ÷ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÍÚÈÛÓÎÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÉÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎÃÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔÓÉÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×èÊÛÓÐÉïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎ èÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×èÊÛÓÐÉïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉéÈÊÛÈ×ÕÓ×ÉìÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÛÎØ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÛØÍÌÈ×ØÛÎØÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ìÛÊÑÉÛÎØ ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎùÔÛÌÈ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÚÍÈÔÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×ÛÎØêÇÊÛÐ çÎÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎèÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×èÊÛÓÐÉïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÐÓÉÈÉÈÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÛÉÛÉÇÚÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÈÊÛÓÐÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅéÇÎÎÃÆÛÐ×ðÍÉ ûÐÈÍÉÛÎØùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÐÓÎÑÓÎÕÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃèÊÛÓÐÅÓÈÔÈÔ×úÛÃûÊ×ÛêÓØÕ×èÊÛÓÐ èÊÛÓÐÉÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÕÇÓØ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ØÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕØ×ÖÓÎ×ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ×É ÖÍÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÉÛÎØÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÓÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÅÎ×ÊÉ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓ×ÉÏÓÈÓÕÛÈ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÛÎØÛØØÊ×ÉÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ Consistency óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×éÈÊÛÈ×ÕÓ×ÉìÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÛÎØóÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×èÊÛÓÐÉïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÓÎÙÐÇØ×Éø×ÉÓÕÎõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉèÔ×ø×ÉÓÕÎõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛØØÊ×ÉÉÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÖÍÊÉÓÈÓÎÕÛÎØ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÉÖÍÊÛÆÛÊÓ×ÈÃÍÖÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÉÛÎØÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÔ×Î ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÊÍÇÈ×ÉÉÔÍÅÎÍÎÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×èÊÛÓÐÉïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎïÛÌèÔ×ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÍÇÈÐÓÎ×ÉÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÇÉ×ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÉ ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÛÐÐÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÍÎÈÔ××ØÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÇÊÚÛÎÓÂ×Ø ÎÍÎÇÊÚÛÎÓÂ×ØÙÍÇÎÈÃÛÊ×ÛûÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÍ ÇÎÓËÇ×ÈÊÛÓÐÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÉ×ÈÈÓÎÕôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÉÌÓÊÓÈÛÎØÓÎÈ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÉÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÓÉÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÈÍÚ×ÔÛÊÏÍÎÓÍÇÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÕÍÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ×ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÈÊÛÓÐ ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÏÇÐÈÓÌÐ×ÇÉ×ÊÉÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÛÉÛÖ××ÄÌ×ÊÓ×ÎÙ×ÖÍÊÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉ ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÈÊ××ÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ General Plan and Zoning Designations of the Corridor èÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎðÛÎØçÉ×ïÛÌØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÉæ×ÊÃ ðÍÅø×ÎÉÓÈÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐèÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÙÓÈÃÐÛÎØÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔìÛÊÑÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉìÛÊÑÉÛÎØíÌ×Î éÌÛÙ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÖÍÊÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÉÓÈ×ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×Ø ùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉ ðÍÅø×ÎÉÓÈÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØðÍÅ ï×ØÓÇÏø×ÎÉÓÈÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÂÍÎ×ØûûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉ ÂÍÎ×ØìêìÇÚÐÓÙìÛÊÑÍÊê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÂÍÎÓÎÕÏÛÌùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 98 Environmental Checklist ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÂÍÎ×ØéÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØéÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐùÐÇÉÈ×Ê Consistency èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÓÉÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ× õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÏÛÃÎ××ØÈÍÚ×Ê×ÂÍÎ×ØÖÊÍÏ ûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÍÎÙ×ÖÇÈÇÊ×ÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎØ×ÙÓØ×ØÛÉÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐ×ÕÛÙÃÖÛÊÏÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ÇÉ×éÓÎÙ×ÈÔÓÉÊ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÓÉÎÍÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐù÷ëûÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÅÛÊÊÛÎÈ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÈÓÏ×ÍÖÊ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕ City of Cupertino General Plan Policies èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛØÍÌÈ×ØÛÎ×Åõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÓÎø×Ù×ÏÚ×Ê ÛÎØÈÔ×ðÛÎØçÉ× É×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÔ×ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎìÍÐÓÙÃÅ×Ê×ÇÌØÛÈ×ØÓÎòÇÎ× íÆ×ÊÛÐÐÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ìÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎèÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÌ èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑöÐÍÍØìÐÛÓÎÓÉÏÍÉÈÌÊÍÏÓÎ×ÎÈÇÊÚÛÎÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ× ÈÊÛÓÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×èÔ×ÐÛÎØÓÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÖÍÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÖÛÊÏÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÛØÒÍÓÎÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÉ×ÈÛÉÓØ× ÖÍÊÐÍÅØ×ÎÉÓÈÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÇÉ×èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÌÐÛÎÊ×ÈÛÓÎÉÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×Ê éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑöÐÍÍØìÐÛÓÎÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÊ×É×ÊÆÍÓÊÛÎØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÐÛÈ× ÉÏÛÎÃÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÆ×ÛØÆÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÖÍÊÏÛÐÇÊÚÛÎÈÊÛÓÐ ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ×ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÈÔ×éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍúÛÃÈÍÈÔ×ìÛÙÓÖÓÙíÙ×ÛÎ ÛÎØ õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÉÔÛÆ×ÛÐÐÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÛÎÛÏÚÓÈÓÍÇÉÌÐÛÎÈÍÐÛÎØÉ ÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÇÊÌÍÉ×èÔ×ùÓÈÃÛÙËÇÓÉÓÈÓÍÎÍÖðÓÎØÛæÓÉÈÛìÛÊÑïÙÙÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ÛÎØÈÔ×éÓÏÏÉÛÎØéÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÈÔ×É×ÌÐÛÎÉèÔ×ÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÖÍÊÈÔÓÉ ÛÙÊ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÅÓÐÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ×É×ÐÛÈÈ×ÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÆÓÛÛÈÊÛÓÐ ÐÓÎ×ÛÊÌÛÊÑ èÔÓÉìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÈÔ×É×ÌÐÛÎÉÚÃ ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÔÓÙÔÔÛÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÚ××ÎÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÛÎØÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÎÕÈÔ× ÈÊÛÓÐ ÐÓÎ×ÛÊÌÛÊÑèÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐö×ÛÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÉÈÇØÃÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔÛÈÓÈÓÉÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ× ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖÍÎÉÈÊ××ÈÛÎØÉ×ÌÛÊÛÈ×ØÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ×ÌÛÈÔÉÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÎÕêÛÎÙÔÍéÛÎûÎÈÍÎÓÍÛÎØ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÇÎÈÃìÛÊÑÉûÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ× ÛÙÊ×ÖÍÊÏ×ÊËÇÛÊÊÃ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÖÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÛÎÃÍÎêÍÛØÅÍÇÐØÚ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÈÍÐÓÎÑðÓÎØÛæÓÉÈÛìÛÊÑÈÍ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÇÎÈÃìÛÊÑèÔ×ÖÍÊÏ×ÊËÇÛÊÊÃÔÛÇÐÊÍÛØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÉðÓÎØÛæÓÉÈÛìÛÊÑ êÍÛØÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÈ×ÊÏÓÎÇÉÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐ èÅÍ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎðÛÎØçÉ× ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃø×ÉÓÕÎÛÎØ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×É×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÓÎÙÐÇØ× ðÛÎØçÉ× ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃø×ÉÓÕÎ Policy 2-69 óÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑÛÙÊ×ÛÕ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÎÙÓÛÐÓÏÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈÓÍÎ Policy 2-73 ø×ØÓÙÛÈ×ÍÊÛÙËÇÓÊ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÐÛÎØÉÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÈÍÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÉÛÎØ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÖÍÊÛÏÍÊ×ÅÛÐÑÛÚÐ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ Policy 2-74 ìÊÍÆÓØ×ÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØ×ËÇÛÐÈÍÛÏÓÎÓÏÇÏÍÖÈÔÊ××ÛÙÊ×ÉÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÐ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉ Policy 2-75 ÷ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ×ÛÙÔÔÍÇÉ×ÔÍÐØÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÔÛÐÖÏÓÐ×ÅÛÐÑÍÖÛÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÌÛÊÑÍÊ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑÅÓÈÔÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÊÍÇÈ×ÓÉÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÖÊ××ÍÖÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐ ÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÉÈÊ××ÈÉÅÓÈÔÔ×ÛÆÃÈÊÛÖÖÓÙåÔ×Ê×Æ×ÊÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÐÓÎÑÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÌÛÊÑÉ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 99 Policy 2-79: ø×ÉÓÕÎÌÛÊÑÉÈÍÇÈÓÐÓÂ×ÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÎØÈÍÌÍÕÊÛÌÔÃÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÈÍÑ××Ì ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÙÍÉÈÉÐÍÅ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É Policy 5-8 ÷ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÎØËÇÛÉÓÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÈÍÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌ×ÈÔ×ÓÊÙÓÈÃÛÊ×ÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ Î×ÛÊÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÎÍÎÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÎÍÎ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÉ Policy 5-10 ÷ÏÌÔÛÉÓÂ×ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÛÎØÌ×ÉÈÊ×ÉÓÉÈÛÎÈÎÛÈÓÆ×ÛÎØÎÍÎÓÎÆÛÉÓÆ×ÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ× ØÊÍÇÕÔÈÈÍÐ×ÊÛÎÈÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÕÊÍÇÎØÙÍÆ×ÊÉÅÔ×ÎÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÎ×ÛÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐÃÖÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÍÖ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÖÊÍÏØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎ Policy 5-13 ðÓÏÓÈÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÈÍÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÌÊ×É×ÊÆÓÎÕÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÔÓÑÓÎÕÔÍÊÉ×ÚÛÙÑÊÓØÓÎÕÏÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÚÓÑÓÎÕÛÎØÙÛÏÌÓÎÕ Policy 5-14 ìÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎØÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÚÍÈÔÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÏÍÉÈÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐÃÖÍÊÈÔ×Ú×Î×ÖÓÈÍÖÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÈÔÛÈÓÉÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ÍÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ Policy 5-27 ê×ÈÛÓÎÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÙÊ××ÑÚ×ØÉÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÅÛÈ×ÊÙÍÇÊÉ×ÉÛÎØÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×Ø Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ×ÓÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÛÎØÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØÛÉÉÓÉÈ ÕÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊÌ×ÊÙÍÐÛÈÓÍÎ÷ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ÐÛÎØÛÙËÇÓÉÓÈÓÍÎØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÉÇÙÔÛÊ×ÛÉ Consistency èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ×ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÛÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØØ×ØÓÙÛÈ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÐÛÎØÉÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÈÍÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÚÃÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÛ ÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÚ×ÈÅ××ÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÔ×ÐÌÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÓÈÉÕÍÛÐÉÍÖÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÈÔÊ××ÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØÖÍÊ ×Æ×ÊÃ ùÓÈÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÛÌÛÊÑÈÔÛÈÓÉÛÔÛÐÖÏÓÐ×ÅÛÐÑÖÊÍÏ×ÛÙÔùÓÈÃ ÔÍÇÉ×ÔÍÐØÚÃÍÌ×ÎÓÎÕÇÌÛÎ×ÅÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÛÐÉÍÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ×÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉèÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÉÖÍÊÚÍÈÔÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÌÊ×É×ÊÆÓÎÕÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÇÉ×ÎÛÈÓÆ× Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÚÛÙÑÈÍÛÏÍÊ× ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÐÃÉÇÉÈÛÓÎÛÚÐ×ÛÎØÔ×ÛÐÈÔÃÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ åÔ×Ê×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÍÈÔ×Êõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÛÊ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÉÈÔ×ÃÊ×ÐÛÈ×ÈÍÍÈÔ×Ê×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÉÉÇ×É×Õõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎîÍÓÉ× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×îÍÓÉ×É×ÙÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØèÊ××íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×úÓÍÐÍÕÃé×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØèÊ×× íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆ×Ô×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÖÓÆ× ÍÛÑÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÚÛÃå×ÉÈ×ÊÎÉÃÙÛÏÍÊ×ÛÎØÚÓÕÐ×ÛÖÏÛÌÐ×ÛÎØÈÅÍ Ù×ØÛÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×Éø×ÍØÛÊÙ×ØÛÊÛÎØÚÐÇ×ÛÈÐÛÉÙ×ØÛÊÈÊ××ÉèÔ×ÉÓÎÕÐ×ÈÊÇÎÑØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈ Ö××È ÖÊÍÏÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛØ×ÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉÖÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉèÔ×ÏÇÐÈÓÈÊÇÎÑØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÕÊÛØ×ÓÉ ÓÎÙÔ×ÉÖÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÊ××ÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÚ× ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÛÉÛÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÂÍÎÓÎÕÈ×ÎÈÛÈÓÆ×ÏÛÌÇÉ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÍÊÌÊÓÆÛÙÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ ÛÎêÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈô×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÎÃÈÊ××ÍÊÕÊÍÆ×ÍÖÈÊ××ÉÅÔÓÙÔÚ×ÙÛÇÉ× ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÓÈÉÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÆÛÐÇ×ÇÎÓËÇ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÕÓÊÈÔÔ×ÓÕÔÈÍÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÔÛÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 100 Environmental Checklist Ú××ÎÖÍÇÎØÚÃÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÈÍÔÛÆ×ÛÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×îÍ Ô×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×û×ÉÈÔ×ÈÓÙÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÎÈÅÛÉÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×Ø ùÓÈÃéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÈÊÛÓÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎØ×ÈÛÓÐÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÃ×ÈØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÛÊ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎöÓÎÛÐØ×ÉÓÕÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐ ÉÈÊÓÆ×ÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÛÐÐÈÊ××ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉèÊ××Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÉÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ× ùÓÈÃÓÎÈ×ÎØÉÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÈÅÍÊÍÅÉÍÖÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÊ××ÉÛÉÛÚÇÖÖ×ÊÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÎØÛÐÉÍÛÂÍÎ×ÍÖÊÓÌÛÊÓÛÎÛÎØÎÛÈÓÆ×ÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÈÍÌÍÖÚÛÎÑÍÖ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÛÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×Ø×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÓÎÈÔÓÉØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ óÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÇÌ Citrus sinensis ÍÊÛÎÕ×ÈÊ××ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØóÈÓÉ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÊ×ÏÍÆÓÎÕÍÎ×ØÓÛÏ×È×Ê Quercus agrifoliaAesculus californica ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÈÅÍÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎØÓÛÏ×È×Ê Juglans spp.Salix spp. ÈÔÊ××ÅÛÐÎÇÈÈÊ××ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎØÓÛÏ×È×ÊÛÎØÍÎ×ÅÓÐÐÍÅÓÎ ØÓÛÏ×È×ÊíÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÚÇÙÑ×Ã×ÉÓÉÕÊÍÅÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈÛÎØÍÖÎÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ× Arundo ÕÓÛÎÈÊ××ØØÍÎÛÄÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎ ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÅÛÐÎÇÈÈÊ××ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÏÛÃÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÛÉÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ØÓÉ×ÛÉ×Ø Consistency ûÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÅÓÐÐÚ×ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÛÎØÍÎÖÓÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÔÇÉ×ÎÉÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙÃ õÊÛØÓÎÕÛÎØúÇÓÐØÓÎÕíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×É èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔÛÈÕÊÛØÓÎÕÌÐÛÎÉÚ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÛÐÐÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÛØÓÎÕÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÖÍÊÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉèÔ×ìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÈÔ×É×ÕÊÛØÓÎÕÌÐÛÎÉÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙÃÅÓÈÔÈÔ×õÊÛØÓÎÕ íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×úÇÓÐØÓÎÕø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÓÖ Î×ÅÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÔÛÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÈÔÓÉÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÙÍÎÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×úÇÓÐØÓÎÕùÍØ× Consistency ê×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÛØÓÎÕÛÎØÌÐÛÎÉÚÃÈÔ×ìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÛÎØ úÇÓÐØÓÎÕø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ× õÊÛØÓÎÕíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØúÇÓÐØÓÎÕùÍØ× ìÛÊÑÓÎÕ ûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÂÍÎ×ØûûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈ ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÓÉÂÍÎ×ØìêìÇÚÐÓÙìÛÊÑÍÊê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÂÍÎÓÎÕÏÛÌ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖâÍÎÓÎÕùÍØ×ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊ ÈÔ×É×ÂÍÎ×ÉÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÓÉÍÖÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÛÎØÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈûÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÉ×ÛÉÍÎ ÓÎ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÖÈ×ÊÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ Ê×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÚÃùÓÈÃÉÈÛÖÖÓÎéÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈØÛÈ×ØíÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÙÔÛÐÐ×ÎÕ×ÅÛÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕèÔ×Ê×ÌÍÊÈÉÈÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈØÓØÎÍÈÏ××ÈÈÔ× ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÎØÍÆ×ÊÖÐÍÅÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÓÏ×ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÏÍÎÈÔÉÍÖ òÇÐÃÛÎØé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê óÎÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÈÍÈÔÓÉÓÉÉÇ×ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÉÈÛÖÖÏÛØ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ× ÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ ØÛÃÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÎØÍÆ×ÊÖÐÍÅÓÎÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉûÖÈ×ÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ØÇÙ×Ø ÈÍÈÛÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑùÓÈÃÉÈÛÖÖÊ×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÓÎéÈÛÖÖ ê×ÌÍÊÈØÛÈ×ØïÛÊÙÔ ÈÔÛÈØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× É×ÛÉÍÎïÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×ÊÈÔ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 101 ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ×ÄÙ××Ø×ØÈÔ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÇÌÌÐÃÍÎÐÃ ÍÎÙ×óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙÓÎÕÈÔ×ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÌÓÙÎÓÙÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÈÔ×ÊÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÐÉÍÅ×Ê× ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÏÓÎÓÏÛÐÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÍÈÔ×Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØèÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÉÈÊÍÎÕÐÃ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕÓÎÕÙÛÊÌÍÍÐÓÎÕÊ×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕÉÈÛÖÖÈÍÌÛÊÑÛÈïÍÎÈÛæÓÉÈÛôÓÕÔéÙÔÍÍÐÍÎØÛÃÉÅÓÈÔ ÔÓÕÔ×ÄÌ×ÙÈÛÎÙÃÍÖÌÛÈÊÍÎÉÛÎØÔÓÊÓÎÕø×ÌÇÈÃéÔ×ÊÓÖÖÉÍÎ×Æ×ÎÈØÛÃÉÈÍÔ×ÐÌÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÛÎØÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÍÎÕ×ÉÈÓÍÎ ûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉô×ÄÛÕÍÎèÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉóÎÙô×ÄÛÕÍÎ ÅÛÉÔÓÊ×ØÈÍÛÎÛÐÃÂ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÇÌÌÐÃÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔÓÉÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØ Ú××ÎÍÇÕÔÈÍÉÛÈÓÉÖÃØ×ÏÛÎØÛÎØÈÔÇÉÎÍÈÙÛÇÉ×ÏÍÊ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÍÆ×ÊÖÐÍÅÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏÐÍÈô×ÄÛÕÍÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÇÎØ×ÊìÔÛÉ× ÅÍÇÐØ Õ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÈÊÛÓÐÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×Ê ÈÅÍÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖ ùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÊÓÚÇÈÛÚÐ×ÉÍÐ×ÐÃÈÍÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ Î×ÅÌÛÉÉ×ÎÕ×ÊÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÉÈÛÐÐÉÛÎØ ÚÇÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÖÍÊÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉîÍÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÉÇÌÌÐÃÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÉÛÊ×Ú×ÓÎÕÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØèÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐ Î×ÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×Ú×ÌÛÉÉ×ÎÕ×Ê Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÈÛÐÐÉÛÎØ ÚÇÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É öÇÊÈÔ×ÊÏÍÊ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÍô×ÄÛÕÍÎ ÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×É ÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÇÉÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÚÃÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉ Æ×ÊÉÇÉÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÐèÔ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÌÍÍÐÇÉ×ÊÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×ÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉ ÊÍÉ×ÖÊÍÏÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÓÎ ÈÍÓÎ èÔ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙ Ê×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÏÛØ×ÚÃùÓÈÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÊÍÉ×ÖÊÍÏÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÓÎ ÈÍÓÎ õÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÈÍÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÐ×ÉÉÆ×ÔÓÙÇÐÛÊÈÊÓÌÉ ÈÍÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ûÔÓÕÔ×ÊÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÏÛÃÎÍÅÐÓÆ×ÙÐÍÉ××ÎÍÇÕÔÈÍÅÛÐÑÍÊÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÈÍ ÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×åÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÇÉÛÕ×ÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÓÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÚ× ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÐÐÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØèÊÛÓÐ öÓÎÛÐÐÃÊ×É×ÛÊÙÔÅÛÉÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÈÍÉ××ÓÖÈÔ×Ê×Å×Ê×ÛÎÃÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÈÊÛÓÐ ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ×éÍÇÈÔúÛÃÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖÇÉ×ÊÉÅ×Ê×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÛÎØÅÔÛÈÈÔ×ÓÊÏÍØ×ÍÖÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÈÍÕ×ÈÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×öÓÎÛÐ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐóÏÌÛÙÈ ê×ÌÍÊÈö÷óêØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐê×ÛÙÔóæ ùÓÈÃÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×Å ÅÛÉÏÍÉÈÊ×Ð×ÆÛÎÈèÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×Ø ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÇÉ×ÊÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖÇÉ×ÊÉÅ×Ê×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÛÎØÅÔÛÈ ÈÔ×ÓÊÏÍØ×ÍÖÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÈÍÕ×ÈÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÓÎïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×Å ÉÔÛÊ×ÉÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÓÈÓ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÓÎÈÔÛÈÓÈÓÉÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØ×ØÚÃ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÇÉ×ÉÏÍÉÈÐÃ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐûÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÇÉ×ÊÉÅ×Ê×ÓÎÈ×ÊÆÓ×Å×ØÍÆ×ÊÈÔÊ××ØÛÃÉÓÎòÇÐÃ ïÛÃ ÇÉ×ÊÉòÇÎ×ÛÎØ ÇÉ×ÊÉÓÎòÇÐÃ ÖÍÊÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ ÇÉ×ÊÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉèÔ×É× ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÛÈÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÍÓÎÈÉÈÍÍÌ×ÎÊ×ÛÙÔ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÚÇÓÐÈÙÊ××ÑÈÊÛÓÐÛÈ ØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÈÓÏ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ØÛÃÛÎØÛÈØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈØÛÃÉÍÖÈÔ×Å××ÑÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÅ××Ñ×ÎØåÔÓÐ× ÈÔ×É×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÛÊ×ÍÆ×ÊÈ×ÎÃ×ÛÊÉÍÐØÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÉÔÛÆ×ÎÍÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÈÔÍÉ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÏÍÉÈÐÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐèÔ× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉÍÖÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÊÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÉÔÍÅÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÊÓÉÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÅÔÍÇÉ×ÉÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÍÊ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÛÎ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÛÒÍÕÅÛÐÑÉÑÛÈ×ÉÑÛÈ×ÚÍÛÊØÍÊÚÓÑ×ÍÇÈÓÎÕíÆ×ÊÛÐÐÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÊÉ ØÓØÎÍÈØÊÓÆ×ÛÎØÍÎÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÍÎ×ÈÍÖÓÆ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÍÖÌ×ÛÑÔÍÇÊÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉØÊÍÆ×ÛÎØÌÛÊÑ×ØÛÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 102 Environmental Checklist ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÔ×ÛØÉÛÎØÈÔÊ××ÈÍÖÍÇÊÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÍÖØÛÓÐÃÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉØÊÍÆ×ÛÎØÌÛÊÑ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔÓÉ Ï×ÛÎÉÈÔÛÈÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔÊ××Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×Ì×ÛÑÔÍÇÊÛÎØØÛÓÐÃÈÊÓÌÉÅÍÇÐØÛÊÊÓÆ×ÛÎØØ×ÌÛÊÈ ÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÚÃÙÛÊûÉÉÇÏÓÎÕÛÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÆ×ÛÇÈÍÍÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃÆÛÐÇ×ÍÖÍÎ×Ì×ÊÉÍÎÌ×ÊÙÛÊÓÈÅÛÉ peak hour ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÅÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÛÎØ daily ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÛÈ×ÛÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉèÔ×ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉÓÎÈÔÓÉö÷óê ÛÐÉÍÉÈÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÈÍÐÍÙÛÐÉÈÊ××ÈÉÍÎÛÌ×ÛÑÔÍÇÊÍÊ ØÛÓÐÃÚÛÉÓÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Î×ÕÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÙÍÏÌÛÊ×ØÈÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÆÍÐÇÏ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÐÓÉÈÓÙÛÐÐÃÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ ×Æ×ÎÚ×ÎÍÈÓÙ×ÛÚÐ××Æ×ÎÓÖÛÐÐÛÙÙ×ÉÉÅ×Ê×ÖÍÙÇÉ×ØÍÎÍÎ× èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÍÎÐÃÛÎ ÏÓÐ×ÐÍÎÕ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÓÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÛÈ×ÓÈÔ×Ê×ÎØÍÖÈÔÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÓÉÉÇ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÛÉÈ Ã×ÛÊÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ÉÍÐÆ×ØöÍÊÈÔ×É×Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉÓÈÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÎÍÈ ÓÉÉÇ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÛÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÍÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÛÊ×Û City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 103 Less Less 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ûê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÛ ÑÎÍÅÎÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÍÖÆÛÐÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÎØÈÔ×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉ ÍÖÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈ×ý Úê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÛ ÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ× Ê×ÙÍÆ×ÊÃÉÓÈ×Ø×ÐÓÎ×ÛÈ×ØÍÎÛÐÍÙÛÐ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÌÐÛÎÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÌÐÛÎÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÐÛÎý Environmental Setting ïÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÖÍÇÎØÛÎØ×ÄÈÊÛÙÈ×ØÓÎéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÕÕÊ×ÕÛÈ×Ø×ÌÍÉÓÈÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÉÛÎØÕÊÛÆ×ÐÛÎØÙÊÇÉÔ×ØÉÈÍÎ×èÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃõ×Î×ÊÛÐ ìÐÛÎØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÛÎÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÛÊ×ÛÓÎÈÔ×ÇÊÚÛÎÓÂ×ØÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÈÔ× ùÍÇÎÈÃèÔ×ïÓÎ×ÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÖÓÕÇÊ×ÍÎÌÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÉçÊÚÛÎ éÇÚÇÊÚÛÎø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ØçÎÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊ Discussion: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact (a & b). ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃ ÍÖÑÎÍÅÎÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÖÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÍÊÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ×ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÙ×îÍÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÍÊÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛîÍÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÈÈÔÓÉÉÓÈ×ÓÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÉÉÍÖÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÛÎÃÐÍÙÛÐÐÃÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÏÓÎ×ÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 104 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.12 NOISE -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ Û÷ÄÌÍÉÇÊ×ÍÖÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÈÍÍÊ Õ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÓÎ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÍÖ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÌÐÛÎÍÊÎÍÓÉ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÍÊ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖÍÈÔ×Ê ÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×Éý Ú÷ÄÌÍÉÇÊ×ÍÖÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÈÍÍÊ Õ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÓÆ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÚÍÊÎ× ÆÓÚÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÕÊÍÇÎØÚÍÊÎ×ÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉý ÙûÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÌ×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎ ÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÛÚÍÆ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÍÇÈ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈý ØûÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØÓÙ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÓÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÛÚÍÆ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈý ×öÍÊÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÐÛÎÍÊÅÔ×Ê×ÉÇÙÔÛ ÌÐÛÎÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××ÎÛØÍÌÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÅÍ ÏÓÐ×ÉÍÖÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÇÉ× ÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ÄÌÍÉ× Ì×ÍÌÐ×Ê×ÉÓØÓÎÕÍÊÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÓÎ ÛÊ×ÛÈÍ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÓÆ×ÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉý ÖöÍÊÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÛ ÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÛÓÊÉÈÊÓÌÅÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ×ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×Ê×ÉÓØÓÎÕÍÊÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÓÎ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÈÍ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÓÆ×ÎÍÓÉ× Ð×Æ×ÐÉý Environmental Setting îÍÓÉ×ÓÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÛÉÇÎÅÛÎÈ×ØÉÍÇÎØéÍÇÎØÐ×Æ×ÐÉÛÊ×ÇÉÇÛÐÐÃÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ØÛÎØ Ê×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÓÎØ×ÙÓÚ×ÐÉØúÛÇÎÓÈÅÔÓÙÔØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÉÈÔ×ÛÏÌÐÓÈÇØ×ÍÊ×ÄÈ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÛÓÊÌÊ×ÉÉÇÊ× ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÅÔÓÙÔÌÊÍØÇÙ×ÉÍÇÎØèÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÎÍÓÉ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÊ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÍÎÊÍÛØÅÛÃÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØúÃÊÎ×ûÆ×ÎÇ×ÛÎØ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÍÛØÛÎØÐÛÊÕ×ÌÓÙÎÓÙÍÊÉÅÓÏÏÓÎÕÕÊÍÇÌÉÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÇÏÏ×Ê Regulatory Setting ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ ÈÔ×ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÎÍÊÏÛÐÐÃÛÙÙ×ÌÈÛÚÐ× ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃîÍÓÉ×÷ÄÌÍÉÇÊ×ùî÷ðØúÐ×Æ×ÐÖÍÊÍÇÈØÍÍÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÛÉÓÉ ØúÖÍÊ ÌÐÛÃÕÊÍÇÎØÉÛÎØÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÌÛÊÑÉÛÎØØúÖÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÇÉ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÉÊÓØÓÎÕ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 105 ÉÈÛÚÐ×ÉÅÛÈ×ÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙ×Ï×È×ÊÓ×ÉèÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÔÛÉÛÎÍÓÉ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÅÔÓÙÔ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ÉÚÍÈÔÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÌ×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ùÓÈÃèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÙÍÏÌÐÃÅÓÈÔÈÔÓÉÎÍÓÉ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× Discussion: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact. éÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ØÚÃÔ×ÛÆÃ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍØÛÃÈÓÏ×ÔÍÇÊÉÛÉÉ×È ÖÍÊÈÔÚÃùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐùÍØ×ïÍÎØÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔöÊÓØÛÃÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÛÏÛÎØ ÌÏ ÛÎØéÛÈÇÊØÛÃÛÎØéÇÎØÛÃÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÛÏÛÎØ ÌÏùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÕÊÛØÓÎÕÛÎØ Ø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÅ××ÑØÛÃÉÛÎØÎÍÎÔÍÐÓØÛÃÉÖÍÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉ ÅÓÈÔÓÎ Ö××ÈÍÖÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÙ×É×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ùÍØ×èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØ ÎÍÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÍÊ×ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÈÍÛÌ×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÍÊÈÍÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÓÎ ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÍÖÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÛØÔ×Ê×ÈÍÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐùÍØ×ÛÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ õÊÛØÓÎÕùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎ ûõÊÛØÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÈÍ×ÄÙ××ØÈÔ×ÎÍÓÉ× ÐÓÏÓÈÉÍÖé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ØÇÊÓÎÕØÛÃÈÓÏ×ÔÍÇÊÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ××ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÇÈÓÐÓÂ×ØÔÛÉÔÓÕÔ ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÎÍÓÉ×ÏÇÖÖÐ×ÊÛÎØÛÚÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈØ×ÆÓÙ×ÉÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÎØÓÎÕÍÍØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÔ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃ Ï××ÈÉÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÈÅÍÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ îÍÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐØ×ÆÓÙ×ÌÊÍØÇÙ×ÉÛÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ×ÓÕÔÈÃÉ×Æ×ÎØúûÛÈÛØÓÉÈÛÎÙ× ÍÖÈÅ×ÎÈÃÖÓÆ×Ö××ÈÏ×È×ÊÉÍÊ èÔ×ÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÍÎÛÎÃÎ×ÛÊÚÃÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃØÍ×ÉÎÍÈ×ÄÙ××Ø×ÓÕÔÈÃØúû úîÍÈÅÓÈÔÉÈÛÎØÓÎÕé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûÓÈÓÉÛÆÓÍÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊÈÍ×ÎÕÛÕ×ÓÎÛÎÃ ÕÊÛØÓÎÕÉÈÊ××ÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÍÊÇÎØ×ÊÕÊÍÇÎØÇÈÓÐÓÈÃÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÉ×Æ×ÎÔÇÎØÊ×ØÖÓÖÈÃ Ö××ÈÍÖÛÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÊ×ÛÍÎéÛÈÇÊØÛÃÉéÇÎØÛÃÉÛÎØÔÍÐÓØÛÃÉÛÎØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÎÓÕÔÈÈÓÏ×Ì×ÊÓÍØ ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ùùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÈÔ×ÊÈÔÛÎÉÈÊ××ÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÐÓØÛÃÉ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÛÉ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ øùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÈÔ×ÊÈÔÛÎÉÈÊ××ÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÎÓÕÔÈÈÓÏ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÉ ÇÎÐ×ÉÉÓÈÏ××ÈÉÈÔ×ÎÓÕÔÈÈÓÏ×ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÷èÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÔ×ÐÓÙÍÌÈ×ÊÉÛÉÛÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÍÊØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ× Ê×ÉÈÊÓÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÔÍÇÊÉÍÖÎÓÎ×ÛÏÛÎØÉÓÄÈÔÓÊÈÃÌÏïÍÎØÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔöÊÓØÛÃÍÎÐÃÛÎØ ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×Å××Ñ×ÎØÉÛÎØÔÍÐÓØÛÃÉèÔ×ÎÍÈÓÙ×ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÕÓÆ×ÎÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÈÅ×ÎÈÃÖÍÇÊÔÍÇÊÉÓÎ ÛØÆÛÎÙ×ÍÖÉÛÓØÇÉÛÕ×óÎÙÛÉ×ÉÍÖ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÈÔ×ÈÅ×ÎÈÃÖÍÇÊÔÍÇÊÌ×ÊÓÍØÏÛÃÚ× ÌÛÊÈ ô×ÐÓÙÍÌÈ×ÊÉÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÇÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? No Impact èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÎÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÖÕÊÍÇÎØÆÓÚÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÙÔÛÉÏÛÃ ÍÙÙÇÊÖÊÍÏÊÛÓÐÊÍÛØÐÓÎ×ÉÍÊÚÐÛÉÈÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 106 Environmental Checklist c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. íÎÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÍÌ×ÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÃ×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØ ÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÎÍÓÉ×ÍÆ×Ê ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃÍÊ Ì×ÊÓÍØÓÙÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÍÈÔ×Ê ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÔÍÊÈÈ×ÊÏÐÍÙÛÐÓÂ×ØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÉÓÎÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÖÊÍÏ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÇÉ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÕÊÛØÓÎÕÛÎØÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÊÇÙÑÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊØÛÃØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ØÍÆ×Ê ÅÍÊÑØÛÃÈÔÓÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎ ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊÔÍÇÊèÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔìÔÛÉ× ÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÍÊÈÔ× éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÐÈÔÍÇÕÔÉÍÏ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÏÛÃÛÐÉÍÛÊÊÓÆ×ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ÖÍÊÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÈÛÉÑÉóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÉÐÓÏÓÈÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÓØÐÓÎÕÈÓÏ×ÈÍÏÓÎÇÈ×ÉÌ×Ê ÈÔ×úïìÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÛØÔ×Ê×ÈÍÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇîÍÓÉ×íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐùÍØ×é×ÙÈÓÍÎ õÊÛØÓÎÕùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÛÉØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×ØÛÚÍÆ× e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. èÔ×Î×ÛÊ×ÉÈÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÈÔ×ïÍÖÖ×ÈÈö×Ø×ÊÛÐûÓÊöÓ×ÐØÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø É×Æ×ÎÏÓÐ×ÉÎÍÊÈÔÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÓÉÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÉÛÖ×ÈÃ ÂÍÎ×ÛÎØÍÆ×ÊÖÐÓÕÔÈÛÊ×ÛÍÖÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÈÊÛÖÖÓÙèÔ×êÛÎÙÔÍêÓÎÙÍÎÛØÛÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÓÎÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÛÉÈ ÙÍÊÎ×ÊÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÓÉÈÔ×ÍÎÐÃÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÛÓÊÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÈÍïÍÖÖ×ÈÈö×Ø×ÊÛÐûÓÊöÓ×ÐØ èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ×ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÈÍ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÓÆ×ÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ïÍÖÖ×ÈÈ ö×Ø×ÊÛÐûÓÊöÓ×ÐØ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÛÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÛÓÊÉÈÊÓÌÛÎØÅÍÇÐØ ÎÍÈ×ÄÌÍÉ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÈÍ×ÄÙ×ÉÉÓÆ×ÎÍÓÉ×Ð×Æ×ÐÉÖÊÍÏÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÛÓÊÉÈÊÓÌÉ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 107 Less Less 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING-- ÛóÎØÇÙ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÓÎÛÎÛÊ×Û×ÓÈÔ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÖÍÊ×ÄÛÏÌÐ× ÚÃÌÊÍÌÍÉÓÎÕÎ×ÅÔÍÏ×ÉÛÎØ ÚÇÉÓÎ×ÉÉ×ÉÍÊÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÖÍÊ×ÄÛÏÌÐ× ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÊÍÛØÉÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ý ÚøÓÉÌÐÛÙ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÍÖ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÔÍÇÉÓÎÕÎ×Ù×ÉÉÓÈÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ý ÙøÓÉÌÐÛÙ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÉÍÖ Ì×ÍÌÐ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÓÈÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ý Discussion: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÛÎ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÙÊ××Ñ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÉÇÙÔÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÛÖÖ×ÙÈÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÔÍÇÉÓÎÕÉÇÌÌÐÃÍÊÓÎØÇÙ× ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÕÊÍÅÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÎØÇÙ×ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÕÊÍÅÈÔÓÎ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃîÍÎ×ÅÊÍÛØÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÎ×ÅØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÉÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Ê×ÛÙÔÍÖ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×åÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÛÔÍÇÉ×ÍÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÈÓÉÇÎÓÎÔÛÚÓÈ×ØÛÎØ ÎÍÈÛÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×ÛÎÃ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×îÍÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÐÈ×Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈØÓÉÌÐÛÙ×Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÍÊÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 108 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES -- ÛåÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÍÖÎ×ÅÍÊ ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐÃÛÐÈ×Ê×ØÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÎ××ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÍÊÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐÃ ÛÐÈ×Ê×ØÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÔÓÙÔÙÍÇÐØÙÛÇÉ× ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÓÎ ÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÙÙ×ÌÈÛÚÐ×É×ÊÆÓÙ× ÊÛÈÓÍÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÈÓÏ×ÉÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÉÖÍÊÛÎÃÍÖÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×É ÓöÓÊ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎý ÓÓìÍÐÓÙ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎý ÓÓÓéÙÔÍÍÐÉý ÓÆìÛÊÑÉý ÆíÈÔ×ÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×Éý Environmental Setting: Discussion: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉ Ê×ÛÙÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃöÓÊ×ïÍÎÈÛæÓÉÈÛöÓÊ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÒÇÉÈÅ×ÉÈÍÖéÍÇÈÔöÍÍÈÔÓÐÐúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÚÍÇÈÍÎ×ÏÓÐ× ÛÅÛÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×Î××ØÖÍÊÖÓÊ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÍÊ ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÎÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÎÖÓÊ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉûØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÖÓÊ×ÛÎØ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃ Ú×ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÛÎØÛÖÈ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ èÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃÅÓØ×èÊÛÓÐïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎçÎÓÖÍÊÏóÎÈ×ÊÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐèÊÛÓÐø×ÉÓÕÎçÉ×ÛÎØ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×çøÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø UD 4.9 Fire Suppression øÇÊÓÎÕÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖØ×ÉÓÕÎÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔ× ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÛÕ×ÎÙÃÉÔÍÇÐØ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 109 Ê×ÆÓ×ÅÓÎÙÍÎÒÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÖÓÊ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÈÈÔ× ÉÓÈ×ÈÍÛÐÐÍÅÖÓÊ×ÉÇÌÌÊ×ÉÉÓÍÎ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÌÌÐÓ×É ÈÍÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÈÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×É×Ð×ÙÈÌÐÛÎÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÛÎØÍÊÉ××ØÏÓÄ×ÉÇÈÓÐÓÂ×ØÛÈÉÈÛÕÓÎÕ ÛÐÍÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÓÊÐÍÅÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØØÊÍÇÕÔÈÛÎØÖÓÊ×Ê×ÉÓÉÈÛÎÈÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÈÍ ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÖÇ×ÐÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ii) Police? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÌÍÐÓÙ× ÌÛÈÊÍÐÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÙÊÓÏÓÎÛÐÓÎÆ×ÉÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙ×ÎÖÍÊÙ×Ï×ÎÈÛÙÙÓØ×ÎÈÓÎÆ×ÉÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÛÙÈÓÙÛÐ È×ÛÏÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÉÛ ÏÓÐ××ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×Î××ØÖÍÊÌÍÐÓÙ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÛÊ×ÛÉ ÈÍÌÛÈÊÍÐÚÃÈÔ×ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×Î××ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÌÍÐÓÙ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÍÚ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÍÊÎ×ÅÍÖÖÓÙ×ÊÉèÔ×ùÓÈÃÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÔÛÉ ÛÊÛÎÕ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÈÔÛÈÌÛÈÊÍÐÉÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÍÖÖÉ×ÈÈÔ× ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÎ××ØÍÖÌÍÐÓÙ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×É óÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÛÉÛÖ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ× éÓÕÔÈøÓÉÈÛÎÙ× ùÐ×ÛÊÓÎÕÅÓØÈÔÉÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÙÇÊÆÛÈÇÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÈÍÛÉÉÇÊ×ÛÎÍÌÈÓÏÇÏ ÉÓÕÔÈØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÉÌ××ØÖÍÊÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉÅÔ×Ê×ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×óÖÉÓÕÔÈØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÍÎ ÙÇÊÆ×ÉÛÊÍÇÎØÔÓÐÐÉÍÊÈÔÊÍÇÕÔØ×ÎÉ×ÐÃÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈ×ØÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÓÎÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÉÓÕÎÉÛÎØ ÍÊ Ê×ØÇÙ×ØÉÌ××ØÐÓÏÓÈÉÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×Ø iii) Schools? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ØÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÉÈÇØ×ÎÈÉÉ×ÊÆ×ØÚÃÐÍÙÛÐ ÉÙÔÍÍÐÉ iv) Parks? No Impact èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ã×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÛÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑ v) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐ×ÎÈÊÃÛÎØÈÊÛÓÐÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ ÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÈÔ×Î××ØÖÍÊÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ê×ÕÇÐÛÊ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÉÇÙÔÛÉÐÓÈÈ×ÊÛÎØØÍÕÅÛÉÈ×ÌÓÙÑÇÌ×ÏÌÈÃÓÎÕÈÊÛÉÔÊ×Ù×ÌÈÛÙÐ×ÉÉÅ××ÌÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ÛÖÈ×ÊÖÐÍÍØÓÎÕÛÎØÊ×ÌÛÓÊÉðÛÙÑÍÖÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎÈÔ×Ø×ÕÊÛØÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÉÛÖ×ÈÃÍÊÉ×ÙÇÊÓÈÃÓÉÉÇ×ÉèÔ×ùÓÈÃÔÛÉÔÓÊ×ØÛùÓÈÃÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ÅÍÊÑ×ÊÈÔÛÈÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏÉÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ØÇÈÓ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÛÎØÍÎÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐêÛÎÕ×ÊÉÛÐÉÍ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÊÍÇÈÓÎ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÐÓÈÈ×ÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÈÊÛÉÔØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÉÅ××ÌÓÎÕ ÈÛÉÑÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 110 Environmental Checklist èÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÔ×ÐÌ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÕÊÍÅÈÔÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÐ×ÛÊ×ØÛÎØÍÚÉÈÛÙÐ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÅÔ×Ê×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃ õÍÍØÌÊÇÎÓÎÕÌÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Øø×ÉÓÊÛÚÐ×ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÙÍÆ×Ê ÌÐÛÎÈÉÛÎØÐÍÅÉÔÊÇÚÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ð×ÖÈÓÎÈÛÙÈÛÎØÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÈÍÕÊÍÅÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÓÎ Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÊ×ÛÉîÍÄÓÍÇÉÌÐÛÎÈÉ×ÕÉÈÛÊÈÔÓÉÈÐ×ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÛ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÊÏÛÎÎ×Ê ùÍÊÊ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÅÍÊÑÖÍÊØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÍÊ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÌÊÍÚÐ×ÏÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÈÓÏ×åÔ×Ê×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÈÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê×ÊÍÉÓÍÎÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÌÊÍÚÐ×ÏÉÛÊ×ÙÍÊÊ×ÙÈ×ØïÓÉÉÓÎÕÍÊØÛÏÛÕ×ØÉÓÕÎÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÉÉÍÍÎÛÉ ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×øÛÏÛÕ×ØÕÛÈ×ÉÖ×ÎÙ×ÉÛÎØÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÉÉÍÍÎÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× èÊÛÓÐÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÐÍÉ×ØÓÖÙÍÊÊ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÅÍÊÑÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×ÛÙÙÍÏÌÐÓÉÔ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÈÓÏ× èÊÛÓÐÌÛÆÓÎÕÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÅ×ÌÈÌ×ÊÓÍØÓÙÛÐÐÃÈÍÑ××ÌÓÈÖÊ××ÍÖØ×ÚÊÓÉÚÊÍÑ×ÎÕÐÛÉÉÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÓÈÈ×ÊøÛÏÛÕ×ØÌÛÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÉÉÍÍÎÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× ïÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÛÏÛÎÎ×ÊÈÔÛÈÏ××ÈÉØ×Ö×ÎÉÓÚÐ×ÉÌÛÙ×ÛÎØÖÇ×ÐÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ÖÍÊÖÓÊ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ åÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÊ×Û ÈÍÚ×ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ× ÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×Ê×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÎÍÎ××ØÖÍÊÛÎÃÎ×ÅÍÊÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ùÓÈÃÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÉÈÛÖÖÛÎØÊÛÎÕ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÌÐÛÙ×ÈÍÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÓÎ ÈÔ×ÏÛÎÎ×ÊÈÔÛÈÓÉÇÉ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 111 Less Less 3.15 RECREATION -- ÛåÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÇÉ× ÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÛÎØÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÛÊÑÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÉÇÙÔÈÔÛÈÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐ Ø×È×ÊÓÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊ ÍÊÚ×ÛÙÙ×Ð×ÊÛÈ×Øý ÚøÍ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÊÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊ ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÏÓÕÔÈÔÛÆ×ÛÎÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈ ÍÎÈÔ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈý Discussion: Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact (a & b). èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛ ØÛÃÛÃ×ÛÊ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÉÈÉÅÓÈÔÛÐÓÎÑÛÕ×ÖÊÍÏ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×èÔ×Ê×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÎÍÖ××ÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ØÈÍ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑèÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÚÃÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÔ× ùÓÈÃóÈÓÉÎÍÈÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×É×ÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÛÙÙ×Ð×ÊÛÈ×ØÍÊÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×È×ÊÓÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌÛÊÑÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊ ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÍÖÖÉÓÈ×Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ× ÈÔ××ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÏÓÕÔÈÔÛÆ×ÛÎÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÎÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 112 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.16 -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÌÐÛÎ ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÍÊÌÍÐÓÙÃ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÓÎÕ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÍÖ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÉÖÍÊÈÔ× Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÓÊÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÈÛÑÓÎÕÓÎÈÍÛÙÙÍÇÎÈÛÐÐÏÍØ×ÉÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÏÛÉÉÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÛÎØÎÍÎÏÍÈÍÊÓÂ×ØÈÊÛÆ×ÐÛÎØÊ×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÓÊÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×Ø ÉÈÊ××ÈÉÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÉÛÎØ ÖÊ××ÅÛÃÉÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÌÛÈÔÉ ÛÎØÏÛÉÉÈÊÛÎÉÓÈý ÚùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÙÍÎÕ×ÉÈÓÍÎÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÐ×Æ×ÐÍÖ É×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØÈÊÛÆ×ÐØ×ÏÛÎØ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÍÇÎÈÃÙÍÎÕ×ÉÈÓÍÎ ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÛÕ×ÎÙÃÖÍÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×Ø ÊÍÛØÉÍÊÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÉý Ùê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛÙÔÛÎÕ×ÓÎÛÓÊÈÊÛÖÖÓÙ ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÛÎÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎ ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÐ×Æ×ÐÉÍÊÛÙÔÛÎÕ×ÓÎÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÉÛÖ×ÈÃÊÓÉÑÉý ØéÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÔÛÂÛÊØÉØÇ× ÈÍÛØ×ÉÓÕÎÖ×ÛÈÇÊ××ÕÉÔÛÊÌÙÇÊÆ×É ÍÊØÛÎÕ×ÊÍÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÊ ÓÎÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÇÉ×É×ÕÖÛÊÏ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈý ×ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÓÎÛØ×ËÇÛÈ××Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃ ÛÙÙ×ÉÉý ÖùÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÛØÍÌÈ×ØÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÌÐÛÎÉ ÍÊÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÍÊÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÊ ÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×Ø×ÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÍÊ ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÍÖÉÇÙÔÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×Éý Environmental Setting èÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÔÛÉ× èÊÛÓÐ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÛÈ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÓÉÛÏÛÒÍÊÛÊÈ×ÊÓÛÐÈÔÛÈ ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÉÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÅ×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÈÍôÓÕÔÅÛÃÛÎØÈÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÛÎØÊ×ÈÛÓÐÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ××ÛÉÈÍÖôÓÕÔÅÛÃ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 113 éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÓÉÛÉÓÄÐÛÎ×ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÈÔÊ××ÐÛÎ×ÉÓÎ×ÛÙÔØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎ×ÛÉÈÍÖôÓÕÔÅÛÃ ÛÖÍÇÊÐÛÎ×ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÛÈúÇÚÚêÍÛØÛÎØÚ×ÙÍÏ×ÉÛÈÅÍÐÛÎ×ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÍÎ×ÐÛÎ×ÓÎ×ÛÙÔ ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅ×ÉÈÍÖóÏÌ×ÊÓÛÐûÆ×ÎÇ×ÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖúÇÚÚêÍÛØÛÎØÈÔ×ÊÛÓÐÊÍÛØÈÊÛÙÑÉÈÔÛÈ ÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØèÊÛÆ×ÐÓÎÕÅ×ÉÈÖÊÍÏúÇÚÚêÍÛØÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÈÔ×ÊÍÛØ ØÓÌÉÓÎ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÈÔ×ÎÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×ÈÔ×ÊÍÛØÙÇÊÆ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔÅÔÓÐ×ÊÓÉÓÎÕÓÎ ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎûÙÊÍÉÉìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔÓÉÈÔ××ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÈÍÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÛÎØÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÉÅ×ÉÈÖÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛ ÏÓÐ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕöÍÍÈÔÓÐÐúÐÆØÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊÛÊÈ×ÊÓÛÐÊÍÛØÅÛÃÛÎØÈÔ×Î×ÎØÓÎÕÛÈÈÔ×ð×ÔÓÕÔëÇÛÊÊÃÛÎØ ù×Ï×ÎÈìÐÛÎÈÓÎÈÔ×ÔÓÐÐÉÅ×ÉÈÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ èÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÛÎØ ÈÔÓÉÐÍÈÙÛÎÚ×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊ×ØÈÍÛÐÐÍÅÖÍÊÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÖÍÊÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ ÉÌÛÙ×É ÐÍÈÔÛÉÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÅÓØÈÔÛÎØÕÊÛØÓ×ÎÈÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ××Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? No Impact. èÔ×ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔ×ÍÌ×ÎÓÎÕ ÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÏÓÐ×ÐÍÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ ô×ÄÛÕÍÎèÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉóÎÙÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÛÊ×ÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈô×ÄÛÕÍÎ ÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈÌÊ×ØÓÙÈ×ØÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÎÊ×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÈÍ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØèÔ× èÊÛÖÖÓÙ ê×ÌÍÊÈÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÅÛÉÏÓÎÍÊÛÎØÓÈ ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÈÍÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÏÌÛÙÈÉéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÛ ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎØ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÍÇÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÔÛÆ×ÎÍÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ØÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÎÍÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ×ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÏÓÐ×ÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÛÊ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×Ø èÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÇÉ×ÊÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÓÎÛÎØÇÉ×ÊÙÍÇÎÈÉÓÎ ÍÌ×ÎÉÈÊ×ÈÙÔ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÎïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐê×ÛÙÔé×ÕÏ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×öÓÎÛÐ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐóÏÌÛÙÈê×ÌÍÊÈö÷óêÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÎòÇÐÃ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÇÉ×ÊÉÅ×Ê×ÓÎÈ×ÊÆÓ×Å×ØÍÆ×ÊÈÔÊ××ØÛÃÉûÉÎÛÌÉÔÍÈÍÖÈÔ× ÖÍÇÎØÈÍÚ×ÛÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÅÔÍÇÉ×ÉÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÍÊÊ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÛÎ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÛÒÍÕ ÉÑÛÈ×ÚÍÛÊØÍÊÚÓÑ×ÍÇÈÓÎÕéÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×ÛÐÉÍØÍÎ×ÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÏÍØ×ÍÖÛÙÙ×ÉÉÖÍÊ ÈÔ×É×ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉíÆ×ÊÛÐÐÈÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ØÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÚÃÚÓÑ×ÍÊÍÎÖÍÍÈ×ÓÈÔ×Ê ÅÛÐÑÓÎÕÍÊÒÍÕÕÓÎÕíÎÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÍÎÐÃÛÚÍÇÈÍÎ×ÈÍÖÓÆ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÍÖÌ×ÛÑÔÍÇÊÇÉ×ÊÉØÊÍÆ×ÛÎØ ÌÛÊÑ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÈÔÊ××ÈÍÖÍÇÊÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÍÖØÛÓÐÃÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉØÊÍÆ×ÛÎØÌÛÊÑ×ØÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐùÓÈÃ ÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×Å èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ÉÛÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÇÉ×ÊÌÊÍÖÓÐ×ÅÓÈÔÏÍÉÈÇÉ×ÊÉ ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÍÎÖÍÍÈÍÊÚÃÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÛÎØÎÍÈÚÃÙÛÊóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÓÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×Ð×ÎÕÈÔÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑ ÈÊÛÓÐÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅÍÇÐØÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÛÚÍÇÈ Ö××ÈÛÚÍÇÈÏÓÐ×ÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÈÍ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔÓÉÐ×ÎÕÈÔÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÛÈÈÊÛÙÈÇÉ×ÊÉÖÊÍÏÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÍÎÖÍÍÈÍÊÍÎÚÓÑ×ÉÊÛÈÔ×ÊÈÔÛÎÅÓÈÔÙÛÊÉ b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2011 Page 114 Environmental Checklist established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Impact. éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÛÈÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÉÎÍÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ùÍÇÎÈÃÍÖéÛÎÈÛùÍÎÕ×ÉÈÓÍÎïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÕÊÛÏùïìÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÎÍ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÍÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùïì c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈÎ×ÛÊÛÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÓÊÌÍÊÈÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈÛÓÊÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÉùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÉÔÛÊÌÈÇÊÎ ÅÔ×Ê×ÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÍÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ××ÄÓÈÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÎÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØûÈÈÔÛÈÌÍÓÎÈÈÔ×ÌÛÈÔÅÛÃÅÓÐÐÛÎÕÐ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÉÓØ×ÅÛÐÑÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔÉÓØ×ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÉÈÍÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÚÊÓØÕ× ÉÌÛÎÎÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÔÓÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÔÛÂÛÊØÉÖÍÊÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉÓÖÎÍÈØ×ÉÓÕÎ×Ø ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÐÃèÔÓÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐØ×ÉÓÕÎÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉ×ÄÓÈÓÎÕÈÔ× éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÅÛÊ×ÍÖÛÎØÅÓÐÐÉÛÖ×ÐÃÏÛÎ×ÇÆ×ÊÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛèÔ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ× ÛÉ×ÎÕÓÎ××Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÓÆÓÐ×ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÍÖÊ×ÙÍÊØÛÎØÛÉÛÙÙ×ÌÈÛÚÐ×ÈÍÈÔ×ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈø×ÉÓÕÎÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÛÈÈÔÓÉÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÏÛÃÓÎÙÐÇØ××Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃ Ö×ÎÙÓÎÕÙÔÓÙÛÎ×ÉÈÃÐ×ÍÖÖÉ×ÈÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É èÔ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÙÍÇÐØÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÔÛÂÛÊØÉÓÖÓÈ ÓÉÎÍÈØ×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÌÊÍÌ×ÊÐÃèÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÖÍÙÇÉ×ÉÍÎÈÔÓÉÎ×ÅÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×îÍÍÈÔ×ÊÉÛÖ×ÈÃ ÔÛÂÛÊØÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØöÓÎÛÐØ×ÉÓÕÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÇ× ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈ õÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÈìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×ÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍ ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÎØÈÍÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔ×Î×ÅÈÊÛÓÐÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×ÍÎ ÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÉÓØ×ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÐÓÆÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÎ××Ø ÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÈÍÊ×ÛÙÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÈÊÛÓÐúÓÙÃÙÐÓÉÈÉ Ð×ÛÆÓÎÕÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÔÍÅÓÉÔÈÍÈÊÛÆ×ÐÅ×ÉÈÈÍÅÛÊØ öÍÍÈÔÓÐÐúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÏÇÉÈÇÉ×ÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×ÍÎÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔÉÓØ×ÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ èÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÛÈéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÔÛÊ ðÛÌÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÉÉÌÛÙ×ÛÐÐÍÅÉÛÏ×ØÓÛÎÓÉÐÛÎØÅÓÈÔÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÊ×ÖÇÕ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×Ø Î×ÛÊÈÔ×Ù×ÎÈ×ÊÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÍÏ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÛÐÏÓÎÕÓÎÈÔÓÉ ÏÍÈÍÊÓÉÈÅÛÊÎÓÎÕÐÓÕÔÈÉÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÍÎÚÍÈÔØÍÅÎ ÕÊÛØ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔÈÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÈÍÛÐ×ÊÈÏÍÈÍÊÓÉÈÉÍÖÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÇÉ× èÔ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÔÛÂÛÊØÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔÓÉÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÅÓÐÐÚ×Ð×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÉÈÔ× ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÔ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉøÓÊ×ÙÈÍÊóÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÍÈÔ×Ê×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÎÕÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÉÓÎ ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÔ×ÍÎ×ÍÎïÛÊÃûÆ×ÎÇ×Ú×ÈÅ××Îï×ÏÍÊÓÛÐìÛÊÑÛÎØèÔ×íÛÑÉéÔÍÌÌÓÎÕ ù×ÎÈ×ÊûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÙÊÍÉÉÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÕÓÆ×ÏÍÈÍÊÓÉÈÉÅÛÊÎÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 115 ÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÛÎØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÙÐ×ÛÊÐÃÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÅÓÈÔÛÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×Ï×ØÓÛÎÓÉÐÛÎØÖÍÊÛ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÊ×ÖÇÕ× e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. ÷Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÆÓÛÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÉ ÛÈÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕØÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃÉÛÎØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÛÈÚÍÈÔÍÖ ÈÔ×É×ÐÍÈÉÛÊ×ÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ××Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×É f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No Impact. èÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÈÊÛÓÐÓÉÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕÓÎÕÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÛÇÈÍÏÍÚÓÐ×èÔÓÉ ÏÓÐ×ÐÍÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÐÓÎÑÈÔ×ìÔÛÉ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÅÓÈÔéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÐÆØÛÎØ ÈÔÇÉÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÅÓÈÔÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÉÓØ×ÅÛÐÑÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÈÍÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÈÔ ÍÈÔ×ÊÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÛÎØÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÐÛÎ×ÍÎéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØúÓÑ×ÊÛÙÑÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎÆÛÊÓÍÇÉÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÈÍ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÅÔÍÚÓÑ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖÖ×Ê×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ× õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÉÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÓÈÓÉÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃûÎ ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÊÇÙÑÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊØÛÃÛÊ××ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ØÍÆ×Ê ÛÎÔÍÇÊØÛÃÈÔÓÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎ ÈÊÓÌÉÌ×ÊÔÍÇÊÛÎØÓÉÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈîÍÓÉ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕ ÖÊÍÏÈÔÓÉÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÉÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×îÍÓÉ×É×ÙÈÓÍÎ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 116 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- åÍÇÐØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Û÷ÄÙ××ØÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐåÛÈ×ÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃùÍÎÈÊÍÐúÍÛÊØý Úê×ËÇÓÊ×ÍÊÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÎ×ÅÅÛÈ×ÊÍÊÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÊ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÔÓÙÔ ÙÍÇÐØÙÛÇÉ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉý Ùê×ËÇÓÊ×ÍÊÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÎ×ÅÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÍÊ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÔÓÙÔÙÍÇÐØÙÛÇÉ× ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉý ØôÛÆ×ÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÌÌÐÓ×É ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÊÍÏ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ×ÎÈÓÈÐ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÊ ÛÊ×Î×ÅÍÊ×ÄÌÛÎØ×Ø×ÎÈÓÈÐ×Ï×ÎÈÉ Î××Ø×Øý ×ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÛØ×È×ÊÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÚÃÈÔ× ÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÅÔÓÙÔ É×ÊÆ×ÉÍÊÏÛÃÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔÛÈÓÈ ÔÛÉÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØØ×ÏÛÎØÓÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎ ÈÍÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÙÍÏÏÓÈÏ×ÎÈÉý Öú×É×ÊÆ×ØÚÃÛÐÛÎØÖÓÐÐÅÓÈÔÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÈÔ× ÉÍÐÓØÅÛÉÈ×ØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÎ××ØÉý ÕùÍÏÌÐÃÅÓÈÔÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØÐÍÙÛÐ ÉÈÛÈÇÈ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÉÍÐÓØ ÅÛÉÈ×ý Discussion: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 117 No Impact. îÍÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÕ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÚÃÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊîÍÎ×ÅÊ×ÉÈÊÍÍÏÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÚÇÓÐÈ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÉÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÊ××ÑÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎèÔ× ÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÍÊÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÎ×ÅÅÛÈ×ÊÍÊÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÍÊ ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÅÔÓÙÔÙÍÇÐØÙÛÇÉ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉ c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÎ×ÅÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÍ ÖÍÍÈÅÓØ×ÚÃ ÏÓÐ× ÖÍÍÈÐÍÎÕÈÊÛÓÐ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ× ÈÊÛÓÐÓÈÉ×ÐÖÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÎ×ÅÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÐÍÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÓÉÎÍÈÚ×ÓÎÕ×ÄÌÛÎØ×ØÚÇÈÊÛÈÔ×ÊÚ×ÓÎÕÊ×ÌÛÆ×ØÛÎØÊ×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊ×ØÈÍ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×ÏÍÊ×Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉèÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐÓÏÌ×ÊÆÓÍÇÉÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÛÈÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÏÛÓÎ ÇÎÙÔÛÎÕ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÈÍÊÏÅÛÈ×ÊØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÉ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÛÊ×ÛÙÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ óÊÊÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÌÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÅÍÇÐØÙÍÏ×ÖÊÍÏ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÅÛÈ×Ê×ÎÈÓÈÐ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projected demand in addition to the existing commitments? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÙÔÛÎÕ×ÈÔ×Ø×ÏÛÎØÖÍÊÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×Ê ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈèÔ×ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÅÛÉÈ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÌÐÛÎÈÉ×ÊÆÓÎÕÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÓÉ ÎÍÈÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the solid waste disposal needs? No Impact. çÉ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×Î×ÅÕÛÊÚÛÕ×ÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÛÈ ÈÊÛÉÔÚÓÎÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÌÛÊÑÛÊ×ÛÉèÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÈÊÛÉÔÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×Ø ÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÔ×ÉÍÐÓØÅÛÉÈ×ØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÉÃÉÈ×Ï g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÙÍÏÌÐÃÅÓÈÔÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØÐÍÙÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÈ×ÉÛÎØ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÉÍÐÓØÅÛÉÈ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 118 Environmental Checklist Less Less 3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- ÛøÍ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÈÍØ×ÕÊÛØ×ÈÔ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ× ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÍÖÛÖÓÉÔÍÊÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÖÓÉÔÍÊÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÈÍ ØÊÍÌÚ×ÐÍÅÉ×ÐÖÉÇÉÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÐ×Æ×ÐÉ ÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×ÎÈÍ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÈ×ÛÌÐÛÎÈÍÊÛÎÓÏÛÐ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÊ Ê×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÈÔ×ÊÛÎÕ×ÍÖÛÊÛÊ×ÍÊ ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÌÐÛÎÈÍÊÛÎÓÏÛÐÍÊ ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÈ×ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×ÉÍÖÈÔ× ÏÛÒÍÊÌ×ÊÓÍØÉÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÍÊ ÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÃý ÚøÍ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÆ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÔÛÈ ÛÊ×ÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÐÃÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÚÇÈ ÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ×ý ùÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ×Ï×ÛÎÉÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ×ÓÎÙÊ×Ï×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÛÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐ×ÅÔ×ÎÆÓ×Å×ØÓÎ ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÌÛÉÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÎØÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÌÊÍÚÛÚÐ× ÖÇÈÇÊ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉý ÙøÍ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÔÛÆ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÙÛÇÉ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ ÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎÔÇÏÛÎÚ×ÓÎÕÉ ×ÓÈÔ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÍÊÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃý Discussion: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. íÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÓÏÛÊÃÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉÍÖÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØ ÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÉèÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×ØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÛËÇÛÈÓÙ ÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ê×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÎÕÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÉÈÊ×ÛÏÉÃÉÈ×ÏóÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×óÎÓÈÓÛÐ éÈÇØÃ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÛÐÐÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÆÍÓØ×ØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉÛÎØ ÈÔÛÈÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐÃÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈíÆ×ÊÛÐÐÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÎÛÈÓÆ×Æ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Checklist Page 119 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ly con means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact èÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÔÛÆ×ÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÍÎ ÅÛÈ×ÊËÇÛÐÓÈÃÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØÍÊÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÈÔ×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÅÍÇÐØ ÛÆÍÓØÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉ c) Does the project have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. èÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈ ÔÛÆ××ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐÙÛÇÉ×ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÛØÆ×ÊÉ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎÔÇÏÛÎÉ×ÓÈÔ×ÊØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃ ÍÊÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃóÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉóé ïîøèÔ×É× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÛÐÐÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÆÍÓØ×Ø ÍÊÊ×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÉ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 120 References ëØ×ØËØÏÚØÊ úÛÉÓÎê×É×ÛÊÙÔûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×É ùÇÐÈÇÊÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈóÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕê×ÉÇÐÈÉÍÖ ìÊ×É×ÎÙ× ûÚÉ×ÎÙ×ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐè×ÉÈÓÎÕê×ÆÓÉ×ØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÛÉÈ×Ê ìÐÛÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ 2010 úÛÃûÊ×ÛûÓÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈúûûëïø ÛùÐ×ÛÎûÓÊ Clean Air Plan úûûëïøìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕêÇÐ×ÉÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎìÐÛÎÉíÙÈÍÚ×Ê å×ÚïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ìÐÛÎÉ ùÐ×ÛÎûÓÊ ìÐÛÎÉÛÉÌÄþ Source Inventory of Bay Area Greenhouse Gas Emissions éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍùû ö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ ¾ Ï×ØÓÛ öÓÐ×É ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ ê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ÷ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ×ÎÈÍÊÃ Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃ Ý Air Quality Standards ëÇÛÐÓÈÃéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛÎØûÈÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈúûûëïø ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕêÇÐ×ÉÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ÷ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎóÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÛÎØûÓÊëÇÛÐÓÈÃê×ÐÛÈ×ØÎØ å×ÚòÛÎÇÛÊÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÔÛÎÑÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ ÌÐÎ ÛÓÊÝËÇÛÐÓÈÃ ÛÏÚÓ×ÎÈÝÛÓÊÝËÇÛÐÓÈÃÔÈÏþ California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍùÛ òÇÎ× ÇÌØÛÈ×ØïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ù÷ëû õçóø÷ðóî÷é çÌØÛÈ×Øù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÉÌÄþ ÊÃéÍÇÊÙ×éÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉèÍÍÐéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃïÛÃ Tools and Methodology úûûëïøìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕêÇÐ×ÉÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎù÷ëû õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉïÛÃ å×ÚïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ù÷ëûõçóø÷ðóî÷é èÍÍÐÉ ÛÎØï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÉÌÄþ Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards éÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍùÛïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ù÷ëûõçóø÷ðóî÷é èÍÍÐÉ ÛÎØï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÉÌÄþ Tools and Methodology éÙÊ××ÎÓÎÕûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉèÛÚÐ×Éúûûëïø ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕêÇÐ×ÉÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎù÷ëûõÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉïÛÃ å×ÚïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÚÛÛËÏØÕÍÆ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ù÷ëûõçóø÷ðóî÷é èÍÍÐÉ ÛÎØï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÉÌÄþ Staff Report California 1990 Greenhouse Gas ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛûÓÊê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉúÍÛÊØûêú Emissions Level and 2020 Emissions Limit. . éÛÙÊÛÏ×ÎÈÍùûîÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÛÊÚÙÛÕÍÆ ÙÙ ÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃ ÌÇÚÉ Ê×ÌÍÊÈÉ ÉÈÛÖÖÝÊ×ÌÍÊÈÝ ÝÐ×Æ×ÐÌØÖþ Climate Change Scoping Plan. . éÛÙÊÛÏ×ÎÈÍùûø×Ù×ÏÚ×Ê ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÛÊÚÙÛÕÍÆ ÙÙ ÉÙÍÌÓÎÕÌÐÛÎ ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ ÛØÍÌÈ×ØÝÉÙÍÌÓÎÕÝÌÐÛÎÌØÖ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration References Page 121 Appendix A to the Regulation for the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (. ùùê òÛÎÇÛÊÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÛÊÚÙÛÕÍÆ Ê×ÕÛÙÈ ÕÔÕ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÍÖðÛÎØê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ éÛÎÈÛ ùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃóÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈöÛÊÏÐÛÎØ öÛÊÏÐÛÎØïÛÌÌÓÎÕÛÎØïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕìÊÍÕÊÛÏòÇÐÃ ðÛÉÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ØïÛÃ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐô×ÛÐÈÔèÊÛÙÑÓÎÕìÊÍÕÊÛÏù÷ôèì èÊÛÖÖÓÙðÓÎÑÛÕ× CEHTP é×ÊÆÓÙ×ø× å×ÚïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅ×ÔÓÚÍÊÕ ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÝÈÍÍÐÒÉÌþ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛïÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐùÍØ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎð×ÕÛÐ ìÇÚÐÓÉÔÓÎÕ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÛÏÐ×ÕÛÐÙÍÏ ÎÄÈ ÕÛÈ×ÅÛÃØÐÐ ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ÈÓÈÐ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕýÖÿÈ×ÏÌÐÛÈ×ÉÖÎ ðÛÉÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ØïÛÃ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ õÊ××Î×è×ÊÊÃùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉì×ÊÉÍÎÛÐ ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔùÔÊÓÉÈÓÎÛðÛÇèêû÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×ÉïÛÃ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎðÛÎØçÉ×ÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕïÛÌÉûÌÊÓÐ ðÛÉÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ØòÇÐÃ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÎØùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐ îÍÆ×ÏÚ×ÊðÛÉÈÛÏ×ÎØ×ØòÇÎ× ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍö÷ïûöÐÍÍØÂÍÎ×É ðÛÉÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×Ø ïÛÃ ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÅ×ÚÉÓÈ×Å×ÛÈÔ×ÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎûÙÙ×ÉÉ×ØÍÎÐÓÎ×ÛÈ ûÙÙ×ÉÉ×Ø ùÓÈÃÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×Å öÓÎÛÐ÷óêéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐê×ÛÙÔé×ÕÏ×ÎÈ òÇÎ× ùÍÏÊÛÙÑðúúÍÐÉÈ×ÊòõÇÉÈÛÖÉÍÎøéÈ××Ð×ÛÎØ÷úÇÊÑ×ÈÈûÌÊÓÐ éÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖ éÌ×ÙÓÛÐùÍÎÙ×ÊÎûúÊÓ×Öø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎóÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØ õÛÏ×ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖöÓÉÔÛÎØõÛÏ×åÓÐØÐÓÖ×úÊÛÎÙÔîÍÎÕÛÏ× åÓÐØÐÓÖ×ìÊÍÕÊÛÏê×ÌÍÊÈ éÛÙÊÛÏ×ÎÈÍùûÌÌ Elanus leucurus øÇÎÑòêåÔÓÈ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØñÓÈ×óÎèÔ×úÓÊØÉÍÖîÍÊÈÔûÏ×ÊÓÙÛîÍ ûìÍÍÐ×ÛÎØöõÓÐÐ×ØÉèÔ×ûÙÛØ×ÏÃÍÖîÛÈÇÊÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×ÉìÔÓÐÛØ×ÐÌÔÓÛÛÎØèÔ× ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎíÊÎÓÈÔÍÐÍÕÓÉÈçÎÓÍÎåÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎøù ÷ÔÊÐÓÙÔìêøéøÍÚÑÓÎÛÎØøåÔ×Ã×èÔ×úÓÊØ×ÊÉôÛÎØÚÍÍÑÛÖÓ×ÐØÕÇÓØ×ÈÍÈÔ× ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÍÖîÍÊÈÔûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÚÓÊØÉéÓÏÍÎéÙÔÇÉÈ×ÊóÎÙî×ÅãÍÊÑî×ÅãÍÊÑ ô×ÄÛÕÍÎèÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉóÎÙ ï×ÏÍÊÛÎØÇÏéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑ èÊÛÖÖÓÙóÏÌÛÙÈûÎÛÐÃÉ×Éé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê ôèôÛÊÆ×ÃÛÎØûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×É ð×ÈÈ×ÊÊ×ÌÍÊÈÉ×ÎÈÈÍèêû÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×ÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÚÛÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÓÎÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎúÃøÛÆ×òÍÔÎÉÈÍÎ ìÔøé×ÎÓÍÊåÓÐØÐÓÖ×÷ÙÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÖÍÊôèôÛÊÆ×ÃÛÎØûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ÉíÙÈÍÚ×Ê Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 122 References Summary for Policymakers óÎÈ×ÊÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐìÛÎ×ÐÍÎùÐÓÏÛÈ×ùÔÛÎÕ×óìùù óÎ ùÔÛÎÕ× óÏÌÛÙÈÉûØÛÌÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØùÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÍÖåÍÊÑÓÎÕ õÊÍÇÌóóÈÍÈÔ×öÍÇÊÈÔûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈê×ÌÍÊÈÍÖÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐìÛÎ×ÐÍÎùÐÓÏÛÈ× ùÔÛÎÕ×ïðìÛÊÊÃíöùÛÎÂÓÛÎÓòììÛÐÇÈÓÑÍÖìòÆÛÎØ×ÊðÓÎØ×ÎÛÎØù÷ôÛÎÉÍÎ ÷ØÉùÛÏÚÊÓØÕ×çÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃìÊ×ÉÉùÛÏÚÊÓØÕ×çñ Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report ùÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÍÖåÍÊÑÓÎÕõÊÍÇÌÉóóó ÛÎØóóóÈÍÈÔ×öÍÇÊÈÔûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈê×ÌÍÊÈÍÖÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐìÛÎ×ÐÍÎùÐÓÏÛÈ× ùÔÛÎÕ×áùÍÊ×åÊÓÈÓÎÕè×ÛÏìÛÙÔÛÇÊÓêñÛÎØê×ÓÉÓÎÕ×Êû×ØÉßóìùùõ×Î×ÆÛ éÅÓÈÂ×ÊÐÛÎØ ÌÌ ò×ÎÎÓÎÕÉïêÛÎØïìôÛÃ×ÉìÊ× íÆ×ÊÔÛÊÆ×ÉÈÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕÉ êÛÎÛÛÇÊÍÊÛØÊÛÃÈÍÎÓÓèÔ×ÓÎØÇÙ×Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊÚÇÐÐÖÊÍÕêÛÎÛÙÛÈ×ÉÚ×ÓÛÎÛÓÎÈÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ô×ÊÌ×ÈÍÐÍÕÓÙÛ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐïÛÊÓÎ×öÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×Éé×ÊÆÓÙ×îïöéöÛÙÈÍÊÉÖÍÊø×ÙÐÓÎ×ûéÇÌÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ× îÍÈÓÙ×ÍÖø×È×ÊÏÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊå×ÉÈùÍÛÉÈéÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈ ûÇÕÇÉÈ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐíÙ×ÛÎÓÙÛÎØûÈÏÍÉÌÔ×ÊÓÙûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎîíûû ðÍÛùíïÍÎÈÔÐÃ Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide ï×ÛÎîíûû÷ÛÊÈÔéÃÉÈ×Ïê×É×ÛÊÙÔ ðÛÚÍÊÛÈÍÊÃõÐÍÚÛÐïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕøÓÆÓÉÓÍÎòÛÎÇÛÊÃ å×ÚòÛÎÇÛÊÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅ×ÉÊÐÎÍÛÛÕÍÆ ÕÏØ ÙÙÕÕ ÈÊ×ÎØÉ þ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃ õ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙôÛÂÛÊØâÍÎ×É ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÉÙÙÕÍÆÍÊÕ éùù ØÍÙÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ íÖÖÓÙ× ÍÖ ø÷ì ÔÏ×ÎÈ É ÌØÖðÛÉÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ØïÛÃ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃõ×Î×ÊÛÐìÐÛÎ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÉÙÙÕÍÆÍÊÕ ÌÍÊÈÛÐ ÉÓÈ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÕ×ÎÙÃÙÔÌýÌÛÈÔÿ öÆ öìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ù íÖÖÓÙ× ÍÖ ø÷ì öìÐÛÎÉ ìÊÍÕÊÛÏÉ Î×ÊÛÐ ÈÔ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃûÇØÇÚÍÎéÍÙÓ×ÈÃéùæûé ûÎÎÇÛÐéÌÊÓÎÕúÓÊØÛÈÔÍÎê×ÉÇÐÈÉ è×ÛÏùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÊ××ÑùÊÇÓÉ×ÊÉ÷ØÓÈÍÊøòÛÏÓÉÍÎ ÈÔ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃûÇØÇÚÍÎéÍÙÓ×ÈÃéùæûé ûÎÎÇÛÐéÌÊÓÎÕúÓÊØÛÈÔÍÎê×ÉÇÐÈÉ è×ÛÏùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÊ××ÑùÊÇÓÉ×ÊÉ÷ØÓÈÍÊøòÛÏÓÉÍÎ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÛÊéÈÊ×ÛÏÉ òÇÐÃ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ×éùæåêìù õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É ÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊðÛÎØçÉ×Î×ÛÊéÈÊ×ÛÏÉûÇÕÇÉÈ éÓÚÐ×ÃøÛÆÓØûÐÛÎ èÔ×éÓÚÐ×ÃõÇÓØ×ÈÍúÓÊØÉî×ÅãÍÊÑùÔÛÎÈÓÙÐ××ÊìÊ×ÉÉóÎÙ çÎÓÈ×ØéÈÛÈ×É÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎûÕ×ÎÙÃçé÷ìû ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×Ø The Green Book Nonattainment Areas îÍÎÛÈÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûÊ×ÛÉÖÍÊûÐÐùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛìÍÐÐÇÈÛÎÈÉ for Criteria Pollutants, Criteria Pollutant Reports. çé÷ìûûÌÊÓÐ å×ÚïÛÃ ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅ×ÌÛÕÍÆ ÍÛËÌÉ ÕÊ××ÎÚÑ ÏÇÐÈÓÌÍÐÔÈÏÐþ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration References Page 123 çéöÓÉÔÛÎØåÓÐØÐÓÖ×é×ÊÆÓÙ×çéöåé ö×Ø×ÊÛÐê×ÕÓÉÈ×Ê÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØÛÎØèÔÊ×ÛÈ×Î×Ø åÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØìÐÛÎÈÉìÊÍÌÍÉ×Øø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖùÊÓÈÓÙÛÐôÛÚÓÈÛÈÖÍÊÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛê×Ø Ð×ÕÕ×ØöÊÍÕêÛÎÛÛÇÊÍÊÛØÊÛÃÈÍÎÓÓìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØêÇÐ× ùöêìÛÊÈæÍÐîÍ ÌÌ åÔÓÈ×ùïîòùÐÇÏèòùÛØ×ÛÎØåõôÇÎÈ ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎ×öÛÐÙÍÎöÛÐÙÍ Ì×Ê×ÕÊÓÎÇÉèÔ×úÓÊØÉÍÖîÍÊÈÔûÏ×ÊÓÙÛíÎÐÓÎ×ûìÍÍÐ×÷ØóÈÔÛÙÛùÍÊÎ×ÐÐðÛÚÍÖ íÊÎÓÈÔÍÐÍÕÃê×ÈÊÓ×Æ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×úÓÊØÉÍÖîÍÊÈÔûÏ×ÊÓÙÛíÎÐÓÎ× ÔÈÈÌ ÚÎÛÚÓÊØÉÙÍÊÎ×ÐÐ×ØÇ ÚÎÛ ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2City of Cupertino Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationJuly 2011 Page 124 Environmental Checklist ëØÍÎËÉíËØÍÜËØËÊ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÛÎØøÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈìÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎ èêû÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×ÉóÎÙ ïÓØØÐ×ÖÓ×ÐØêÍÛØéÇÓÈ× ï×ÎÐÍìÛÊÑùû ÅÅÅÈÊÛ×ÎÆÓÊÍÙÍÏ ùÔÊÓÉÈÓÎ×éÙÔÎ×ÓØ×Êé×ÎÓÍÊìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ê ùÔÊÓÉÈÓÎÛðÛÇìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ê ùÔÊÓÉÈÍÌÔ×ÊøÇÕÛÎûÎÛÐÃÉÈóóó éÛÊÛòÍÎ×ÉúÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈóóó ï×ÕÛÎñÛÃÐÛÎÑÛÊûÎÛÐÃÉÈóó éÛÎØÃôÍõÊÛÌÔÓÙÉ City of CupertinoStevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Project Phase 2 July 2011Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration APPENDIX A SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-1 Appendix A. Best Management Practices implemented by the project Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Handbook (Nov. 2005) B1-2 Salvage Native Aquatic Vertebrates from Dewatered Channels If fisheries or native aquatic vertebrate are present when cofferdams, water bypass structures, and silt barriers are to be installed, a fish and native aquatic vertebrate relocation plan shall be implemented to ensure that fish and native aquatic vertebrates are not stranded: 1. In non-tidal channels, where water is to be diverted, prior to the start of work or during the installation of water diversion structures, native aquatic vertebrates shall be captured in the work area and transferred to another reach as determined by a qualified biologist (refer to Fish Relocation Guidelines) 2. Aquatic invertebrates will not be transferred (other than incidental catches) because of their anticipated abundance and colonization after completion of the repair work. B1-3 Conduct In-Channel Work During the Dry Season Avoid and minimize impacts to salmonids by timing stream maintenance projects in streams where there are or could be salmonids so that the use of heavy equipment in the channel is conducted outside of the migration and spawning season. 1. Minor maintenance activities that occur above ordinary high water and do not impact the riparian corridor may be done at any time of the year. These activities include fence repair, graffiti removal, revegetation maintenance, rodent control, etc. 2. Minor activities will be done in channel if the activity is necessary to provide immediate flood protection. These activities include removal of trash or debris that will impede flows, trash rack cleaning, and pier nose cleaning. These activities will be done in a manner that is sensitive to protection of aquatic resources. B1-7 Minimize Stream Access Impacts District personnel shall use existing access ramps and roads where possible. If temporary access points are necessary, they shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes impacts to streams: 1. Temporary project access points shall be created as close to the work area as possible to minimize running equipment down stream channels and shall be constructed so as to minimize adverse impacts, such as tree removal. 2. When temporary access is removed, remaining disturbed soil shall be stabilized and seeded immediately after construction. 3. Any temporary fill used for access shall be removed upon completion of the project. Channel topography and geometry shall be restored to pre-project conditions to the extent possible. B1-8 Remove Temporary Fills as Appropriate Temporary fills, such as for access ramps, diversion structures, or cofferdams, shall be completely removed upon finishing the work. Page 1 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-2 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project B1-9 Minimize Adverse Effects of Herbicides on Non-target Species Herbicides shall be used in a manner that minimizes negative environmental effects by avoiding impacts to non-target species. Herbicide use shall be guided by label restrictions and any advisories published by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR), the Santa Clara County Division of Agriculture, and the U.S. EPA bulletin Protecting Endangered Species, Interim Measures for Use of Pesticides in Santa Clara County (USEPA 2000), including the following: 1. Herbicide use shall be reviewed prior to application using information from CDPR and U.S. EPA maintained in the District GIS database to determine the potential presence of special-status species that could be adversely affected, and the target areas and chemicals used will be modified as necessary. 2. To avoid toxic effects to all life stages of California red-legged frogs (RLF), whenever herbicides are to be used in within 1.25 miles of known RLF locations, refer to both the product label for the material being used and the Endangered Species Database maintained by the CDPR and use the lower of the two recommended rates if there is a difference. B1-10 Minimize Rodenticide Impacts on Non-target Species Burrowing rodents are controlled to minimize damage to levees on streams and canals. Rodent control areas shall be reviewed for the potential presence of special-status species and the rodent control methods tailored to minimize non-target species impacts. When chemical control is necessary, the use shall be guided by label restrictions and any advisories published by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR), the Santa Clara County Division of Agriculture, and the U.S. EPA bulletin Protecting Endangered Species, Interim Measures for Use of Pesticides in Santa Clara County (USEPA 2000). Guidelines for rodenticide use include: 1. Within the potential range of salt marsh harvest mouse (SMHM) (as designated on the District's GIS), lethal rodent control methods shall not be used. The District defines potential SMHM habitat as all areas north of Highway 237, and will refine this definition as surveys are conducted to eliminate areas that are separated by barren ground at least 30 yards from any halophytic vegetation. 2. Prior to rodent control measures being employed, a qualified biologist shall conduct protocol surveys to determine the presence of burrowing owls. a. The location of burrowing owls shall be identified on the District's GIS system. b. A ½ mile buffer zone around burrowing owl locations shall be established. c. If necessary alternative methods of rodent control shall be determined by a qualified biologist. 3. The rodenticide applicator shall remove carcasses of poisoned animals, when they are found, to minimize secondary toxic effects on raptors or other wildlife. Carcass survey and disposal shall be performed in the treated area beginning on the sixth day following the initial exposure of toxic baits. Any exposed carcasses shall be disposed of in a manner inaccessible to wildlife. Carcass surveys shall continue for at least a period of 5 days after the start of the surveys and thereafter, at least once a week, until no more carcasses are found. Any dead raptors Page 2 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-3 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project or other non-target wildlife found in the treated area during the carcass surveys shall be turned over to California Department of Fish and pesticide lab for analysis. B1-11 Migratory Bird Surveys Migratory bird surveys will be performed prior to any project-related activity that could pose the potential to affect migratory birds. Affected areas will be inspected/monitored prior to commencement of the nesting season, and as frequently as necessary thereafter, to provide deterrence measures and prevent nesting by birds. Inactive bird nests may be removed, with the exception of raptor nests. During the nesting season, all project areas that may be impacted by construction, including all vegetation, grounds, and bridge(s), will be inspected with sufficient frequency as needed, to identify any new and partially-built nests. No birds, nests with eggs, or nests with hatchlings shall be disturbed. B1-12 Migratory Bird Nesting Prevention - Vegetation Clearing Vegetation can be cleared and maintained to prevent migratory bird nesting. All necessary vegetation clearing will be performed prior to the nesting season, if at all possible. No vegetation will be trimmed back unnecessarily, including trees and/or shrubs growing near the right of way, which overhang onto the work site. HM-1 Herbicide Use Requirements All herbicide use shall be consistent with approved product specifications. Applications shall be made by, or under the direct supervision of, State Certified applicators under the direction of a licensed Pest Control Advisor. HM-2 Types of Pest Control Pesticide products are to be used only after an assessment has been made regarding environmental, economical, and public health aspects of each of the alternatives. The following pesticides are used by the District: ì×ÉÈÓÙÓØ× Use Herbicides To control algae, weeds and undesirable vegetation To minimize fire hazards To maintain flood conveyance of waterways To maintain compliance with State and Federal requirements Insecticides Used only in and around District buildings, or in the case of a serious pest outbreak, on landscape and re-vegetation facilities Used only after all other methods, such as prevention or natural nontoxic control methods, have proven ineffective Where required, the lowest toxicity shall be used in accordance with the label and the details of this policy Page 3 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-4 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project ì×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Use Rodenticides To control burrowing rodents, including ground squirrels, moles and gophers, in District flood control levees Alternatives such as trapping and smoke bombs are used wherever practical prior to rodenticide use HM-7 Herbicide Use in Upland Areas Application of pre emergence (residual) herbicides to upland areas shall not be made within 72 hours of predicted significant rainfall. Predicted significant rainfall for the purposes of this BMP shall be described as local rainfall greater than 0.5 inch in a 24-hour period with greater than a 50% probability of precipitation. HM-8 Herbicide Use in Aquatic Areas Only herbicides and surfactants registered for aquatic use shall be applied within the banks of channels within 20 feet of any water present. st th Aquatic herbicide use shall be limited to July 1through October 15, except on Guadalupe st River, where applications within 20 feet of the low flow channel are limited to July 1to th August 15. If rain is forecast then application of aquatic herbicide shall be rescheduled. HM-9 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning District vehicles shall be washed only at the approved area in the corporation yard. No washing of District or contractor vehicles shall occur at job sites. HM-10 Vehicle and Equipment Fueling No fueling shall be done in the stream channel or immediate flood plain, unless equipment stationed in these locations is not readily relocated i.e., pumps, generators. For stationary equipment that must be fueled on site, containment shall be provided in such a manner that any accidental spill of fuel shall not be able to enter the water or contaminate sediments that may come in contact with water. Any equipment that is readily moved out of the channel shall not be fueled in the channel or immediate flood plain. All fueling done at the job site shall provide containment to the degree that any spill shall be unable to enter the channel or damage stream vegetation. HM-11 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance No equipment servicing shall be done in the stream channel or immediate flood plain, unless equipment stationed in these locations cannot be readily relocated (i.e., pumps, generators). 1. Any equipment that can be readily moved out of the channel shall not be serviced in the channel or immediate flood plain. 2. All servicing of equipment done at the job site shall provide containment to the degree that any spill shall be unable to enter the channel or damage stream vegetation. 3. If emergency repairs are required in the field, only those repairs necessary to move equipment to a more secure location shall be done in the channel or flood plain. Page 4 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-5 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project 4. If emergency repairs are required, containment shall be provided equivalent to that done for fueling or servicing. HM-12 Hazardous Materials Management Measures shall be implemented to ensure that hazardous materials are properly handled and the quality of water resources is protected by all reasonable means. 1. Prior to entering the work site, all field personnel shall know how to respond when toxic materials are discovered. 2. The discharge of any hazardous or non-hazardous waste as defined in Division 2, Subdivision 1, Chapter 2 of the California Code of Regulations shall be conducted in accordance with applicable State and federal regulations. HM-13 Spill Prevention Prevent the accidental release of chemicals, fuels, lubricants, and non-storm drainage water. 1. Field personnel shall be appropriately trained in spill prevention, hazardous material control, and clean-up of accidental spills. 2. No fueling, repair, cleaning, maintenance, or vehicle washing shall be performed in a creek channel or in areas at the top of a channel bank that may flow into a creek channel. HM-14 Spill Kit Location Spill prevention kits shall always be in close proximity when using hazardous materials (e.g., crew trucks and other logical locations). 1. Prior to entering the work site, all field personnel shall know the location of spill kits on crew trucks and at other locations within District facilities. 2. All field personnel shall be advised of these locations and trained in their appropriate use. WQ-1 Conduct Work from Top of Bank For minor work activities that will occur in the channel, work shall be conducted from the top of the bank if access is available and there are flows in the channel. WQ-2 Use of Wheel and Track Mounted Vehicles in Stream Bottoms Field personnel shall use the appropriate equipment for the job that minimizes disturbance to the stream bottom. Appropriately-tired vehicles, either tracked or wheeled, shall be used depending on the situation. Tracked vehicles (bulldozers, loaders) may cause scarification. Wheeled vehicles may cause compaction. Heavy equipment shall not operate in the live stream. WQ-3 Pump/Generator Set Operations and Maintenance Pumps and generators shall be maintained and operated in a manner that minimizes impacts to water quality and aquatic species. 1. Pumps and generators shall be maintained according to specifications to regulate flows to prevent dryback or washout conditions. 2. Pumps shall be operated and monitored to prevent low water conditions, which could pump muddy bottom water, or high water conditions, which creates ponding. 3. Pump intakes shall be screened to prevent uptake of fish and other vertebrates. Page 5 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-6 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project WQ-4 Handle Sediments so as to Minimize Water Quality Impacts Sediments shall be stored and transported in a manner that minimizes water quality impacts. 1. Wet sediments may be stockpiled outside of a live stream or may be stockpiled within a dewatered stream so water can drain or evaporate before removal. 2. This measure applies to saturated, not damp, sediments and depends upon the availability of a stockpile site. 3. For those stockpiles located outside the channel, water draining from them will not be allowed to flow back into the creek or into local storm drains that enter the creek, unless water quality protection measures recommended by the RWQCB are implemented. 4. Trucks may be lined with an impervious material (e.g. plastic), or the tail gate blocked with dry dirt or hay bales, for example, or trucks may drain excess water by slightly tilting their loads and allowing the water to drain out. 5. Water shall not drain directly into channels (outside of the work area) or onto public streets without providing water quality control measures. 6. Streets shall be cleared of mud and/or dirt by street sweeping (with a water sweeper), as necessary, and not by hosing down the street. WQ-5 Soil Stockpiles If soil is to be stockpiled, no run-off shall be allowed to flow back to creek. WQ-6 Stabilized Construction Entrance The District shall implement measures to minimize soil from being tracked onto streets near work sites: 1. Methods used to prevent mud from being tracked out of work sites onto roadways include installing a layer of geotextile mat, followed by a 4-inch thick layer of 1-3- inch diameter gravel on unsurfaced access roads. 2. Access shall be provided as close to the work area as possible, using existing ramps where available and planning work site access so as to minimize disturbance to the creek bed, creek banks, and the surrounding land uses. WQ-7 Prevent Erosion Downstream of Bank Protection Sites Increased water velocity at work sites may increase erosion downstream. Project design shall assess hydraulic effects immediately upstream and downstream of the work area. If the hardscape revetment would cause significant increase in erosion potential, downstream energy dissipation features such as pools or grade control structures shall be considered in the design. If the evaluation identifies possible downstream impacts, proactive protection of these areas shall be provided. Such measures include, but are not limited to, appropriately keyed-in coir logs, riparian enhancement planting, strategic placement of rock, and flow deflectors. WQ-10 Concrete Use Near Waterways Concrete that has not been cured is alkaline and can increase the pH of the water; fresh concrete shall be isolated until it no longer poses a threat to water quality using the following appropriate measures: 1. Wet sacked concrete shall be excluded from the wetted channel for a period of two weeks after installation. During that time, the wet sacked concrete shall be kept moist Page 6 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-7 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project (such as covering with wet carpet) and runoff from the wet sacked concrete shall not be allowed to enter a live stream. 2. Poured concrete shall be excluded from the wetted channel for a period of two weeks after it is poured. During that time, the poured concrete shall be kept moist, and runoff from the wet concrete shall not be allowed to enter a live stream. Commercial sealants (e.g., Deep Seal, Elasto-Deck Reservoir Grade) may be applied to the poured concrete surface where difficulty in excluding water flow for a long period may occur. If a sealant is used, water shall be excluded from the site until the sealant is dry. 3. Dry sacked concrete shall not be used in any channel. 4. An area outside of the channel and floodplain shall be designated to clean out concrete transit vehicles. WQ-12 Dewater/ Bypass Water at Non-tidal Sites When work in a flowing stream in unavoidable, the entire stream flow shall be diverted around the work area by a barrier. Construction of the barrier shall normally begin in the upstream area and continue in a downstream direction, and the flow shall be diverted only when construction of the diversion is completed. The water diversion plan shall allow stream flows to gravity flow around or through the work site using temporary culverts or stream flow is pumped around the work site using pumps and screened intake hoses. Coffer dam construction shall be adequate to prevent seepage into or from the work area. Coffer dams shall be constructed of river run gravel with a fines content that is less than 15%. Fines are defined as material that is able to pass through a #20 sieve. Coffer dams may also be constructed of sheet piles, inflatable dams, and sand bags. Coffer dams shall be installed both upstream and downstream not more than 100 feet from the extent of the work areas. In-channel berms that only deflect water to one side of the channel during sediment removal, may be constructed of channel material. The enclosure and the supportive material shall be removed when the work is completed and the removal shall normally proceed from downstream in an upstream direction. Normal flows shall be restored to the affected stream immediately upon completion of work at that location. 1. All water shall be discharged in a non-erosive manner (e.g., gravel or vegetated bars, on hay bales, on plastic, on concrete, or in storm drains when equipped with filtering devices, etc.). 2. Sumps or basins may also be used to collect water, where appropriate (e.g., in channels with low flows). 3. Where feasible and appropriate, diversion structures shall be installed on concrete sections of the channels or constructed of materials specified above. Earth fill shall not be used for cofferdams in non-tidal areas. 4. In conjunction with diversion structures, pumps or gravity-fed pipe systems are used to de-water sites. 5. Depending on the channel configurations, sediment removal may occur where the flows are not bypassed around the work site; as long as during excavation activities, a berm of sediment is left between the work area and stream flows to minimize water quality impacts. 6. Diversions shall maintain ambient stream flows below the diversion, and waters discharged below the project site shall not be diminished or degraded by the diversion. Page 7 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-8 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project WQ-13 Minimize Hardscape in Bank Protection Design Bank repair techniques appropriate to a given site based on hydraulic and other site conditions shall be selected. Refer to SMP Appendix E, Programmatic Impact Assessment and Mitigation for Routine Bank Protection Activities. 1. Biotechnical repair methods include live construction, willow wattling, erosion control blankets, brush matting, and installation of root wads and boulders in banks. 2. The repair shall be designed and installed so that it will be self-sustaining and use vegetation that adds structural integrity to the stream bank. WQ-14 Seeding For banks that are scraped, an erosion control seed mix shall be used. Temporary earthen access roads will be seeded when site and horticultural conditions are suitable. WQ-15 Groundwater Management If high levels of groundwater in a work area are encountered, the water is pumped out of the work site. If necessary to protect water quality, the water shall be directed into specifically constructed infiltration basins, into holding ponds, or onto areas with vegetation to remove sediment prior to the water re-entering a creek. Water pumped into vegetated areas shall be pumped in a manner that will not create erosion around vegetation. WQ-16 Avoid Erosion When Restoring Flows All temporary diversion structures and the supportive material shall be removed when the work is completed, but no more than 48 hours after work is completed. The removal shall normally proceed from downstream in an upstream direction. Normal flows shall be restored to the affected stream immediately upon completion of work at that location. Flows shall be restored in a manner that minimizes erosion. 1. When diversion structures are removed, to the extent practicable, the ponded flows shall be directed into the low-flow channel within the work site to minimize downstream water quality impacts. 2. Flows shall gradually be restored to the channel to avoid a surge of water that would cause erosion or scouring. 3. Bypassed flows may be slowly reintroduced into the dewatered area by leaving a silt barrier in place to allow water to slow and drop sediment to the extent possible. WQ-17 Prevent Scour Downstream of Sediment Removal Sites in the transport zone on alluvial fans may cause increased scour downstream if they experience rapid sediment accumulation after sediment removal. Channel reaches up to 500 feet downstream from such sediment removal sites shall be monitored to determine whether accelerated erosion is occurring. If downstream monitoring indicates that erosion is occurring, then remedial action such as rock vortex weirs or similar protection shall be carried out. WQ-18 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Erosion control methods shall be used as appropriate during all phases of routine maintenance projects to control sediment and minimize water quality impacts. The District shall prevent erosion on steep slopes by using erosion control material according to Page 8 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-9 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project specifications. All construction related erosion control methods shall be removed at the completion of the project. Appropriate measures include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Silt Fences 2. Straw Bale Barriers 3. Brush or Rock Filters 4. Storm Drain Inlet Protection 5. Sediment Traps 6. Sediment Basins 7. Erosion Control Blankets and Mats 8. Soil Stabilization i.e. Tackified straw with seed, jute or geotextile blankets, etc. The following Bay Area Stormwater Management Agency Association BMPs provide guidance and specifications as to implementation of the erosion control measures described: SC-3. Sediment Basins SC-4. Straw or Sand Bag Barriers SC-5. Sediment Traps SC-6. Silt Fences SS-1. Erosion Control Blankets, Mats, and Geotextiles VR-1. Brush or Rock Filters VR-2. Check Dams VR-4b. Temporary Outlet Protection VR-4b. Storm Drain Inlet Protection WD-1. Earth Dike WD-1. Slope Drain WD-3. Temporary Drains and Swales WQ-21 Sediment/ Turbidity Control for Discharges Less than 50 NTU To control sediment and turbidity in discharges from project activities where the source is treated water, recycled water, raw water, or groundwater with a turbidity of less than 50 NTU: 1. Characterize the discharge appropriately (follow the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist to ensure the correct BMPs are used): a. Identify the source of water. b. Determine the volume of the water to be discharged. c. Determine if operations may cause the turbidity to be greater than 50 NTU, refer to the BMP Sediment/ Turbidity Control for Discharges Greater than 50 NTU. 2. Choose the option for discharging the water (in order of preference): a. Reuse water, either for dust suppression, irrigation, or construction compaction. b. Discharge to sanitary sewer system (requires approval from local sanitary district). c. Discharge to storm drain system or water body. 3. Use appropriate control measures when discharging water: a. Use sanitary sewer BMPs if discharging to the sanitary sewer. b. Visually monitor the turbidity if it is suspected to be above 50 NTU. c. Terminate the discharge or implement appropriate control measures if the turbidity exceeds 50 NTU (refer to Sediment/ Turbidity Control for Discharges Greater than 50 NTU). Page 9 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-10 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project d. There are no additional control measures required if the source water is hydrant flushing, fire flow testing, a main line break or blow off, and the discharge volume is not greater than 50,000 gallons. 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Before discharging any water, inspect the discharge flow path for debris and erosion, and cleanup the flow path as needed. b. Monitor the discharge to make sure it is not interfering with the normal operation of the sanitary sewer, or flooding the storm drain system. c. When the discharge is complete, inspect the flow path and receiving water (if discharging directly to a water body, if practicable) for evidence of erosion or deposited sediment. d. Sweep up sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. e. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-22 Sediment/ Turbidity Control for Discharge Greater than 50 NTU To control sediment and turbidity in discharges from project activities where the source is treated water, recycled water, raw water, or groundwater with a turbidity of greater than 50 NTU: 1. Characterize the discharge appropriately (follow the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist to ensure the correct BMPs are used): a. Identify the source of water. b. Determine the volume of water to be discharged. c. Determine the turbidity of the discharge. 2. Choose the option for discharging the water (in order of preference): a. Reuse water, either for dust suppression, irrigation, or construction compaction. b. Discharge to sanitary sewer system (requires approval from local sanitary district). c. Discharge to storm drain system or water body (requires use of sediment/ turbidity control measures). 3. Select control measures appropriately. Consider the following criteria when selecting the appropriate control measure: a. Suitability of area for discharge (vegetated surface, chlorine neutralization requirements). b. Proximity to storm drains or receiving waters. c. Length of time BMP is to be in place. d. Ease of installation, operation and removal. Choose from the following control measures and refer to the individual fact sheets for guidance on implementation: a. Discharges to Sanitary Sewer Systems (CM-A). b. Flow Path Vegetation Filtration (CM-B). c. Flow Path Check Filters (CM-C). d. On-Line Filter System (CM-D). e. Storm Drain Inlet Protection (CM-E). f. Silt Fence Culvert Entrance Protection (CM-F). g. Surface Protection Armoring (CM-G). h. Surface Protection Flow Diversion (CM-H). Page 10 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-11 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Before discharging any water, inspect the discharge flow path for debris and erosion, and cleanup the flow path as needed. b. Monitor the discharge to make sure it is not interfering with the normal operation of the sanitary sewer, or flooding the storm drain system. c. Monitor the discharge turbidity to evaluate the effectiveness of the control measure. d. When the discharge is complete, inspect the flow path and receiving water (if discharging directly to a water body, if practicable) for evidence of erosion or deposited sediment. e. Sweep up sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. f. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-23 Discharge Flow Path Vegetation Filtration To remove sediments and prevent sediments from entering local creeks and the bay: 1. Confirm applicability: a. Use this control measure where an existing vegetated area can be used to filter the sediments from the discharged water. b. Make sure the vegetated area is of sufficient density to filter the sediments and of such strength that it will not be uprooted by the discharged water. 2. Design Considerations: a. Ensure that the area to receive the discharge has tight, dense, well-established vegetation similar to a grassy area. b. Control the energy of the discharge or dissipate to prevent erosion of the soil within the vegetated area, and to prevent the destruction and uprooting of the vegetation. c. Adjust the discharge to avoid flooding and excessive runoff. d. Remove debris from the flow path. 3.Construction specifications: a. Ensure that at least 50 feet of grassy ground is available between the point of discharge and the location where the water drains into the receiving storm drain system or the creek. 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Ensure that there is no breakthrough of sediments. b. Ensure that there is no erosion of grassy areas. WQ-24 Discharge Flow Path Check Filters To remove sediment from discharges with a turbidity more than 50 NTU, place check filters at single or multiple location along the flow path accordingly: 1. Design Check Filters Properly: a. Consider the slope, erosion potential, and flow rate of the discharge when choosing filter materials and locating filters. b. Avoid creating large pools and/or obstructive flow paths. 2. Construct Check Filters Correctly: Page 11 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-12 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project a. Place sandbags, socks filled with sand or gravel, and/or dikes made of filter fabric and gravel perpendicular to the flow path. b. Line the sandbags, socks, and dikes tight to divert the flow at least 2 feet outside its normal path. c. Construct an overflow (low spot) in the check filter. If the flow rate of the discharge is high and considerable amounts of sediment appear to be passing by the filter, construct a series of two or more filters until effective removal of sediment is achieved. 3. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Monitor the discharge for breakthrough of sediments and potential traffic hazards caused by ponded water. b. Add more check dams and implement traffic control as necessary. c. After the discharge is finished, sweep up sediment deposited behind check filters and dispose of properly. d. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-25 Discharge On-Line Filter Systems To remove sediments and impurities from discharges with a turbidity that exceeds approximately 50 NTU: 1. Select and Use On-Line Filter Systems Appropriately: a. Use when the discharge is planned and filter assembly can be fitted to the discharge point either permanently or prior to each discharge. b. Choose an on-line filter system capable of removing fine and medium size particulate matter and sediments at the desired discharge flow rate and duration. c. Follow the instructions for use provided by the designer or manufacturer. 2. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Inspect the filter during the discharge for clogging and deterioration, and breakthrough of sediment. Replace the filter as necessary. b. After the discharge is finished, sweep up sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of the sediment properly. c. Dispose of the filter and sediment captured by the filter properly. d. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-26 Silt Fence Culvert Entrance Protection To reduce flow velocity of runoff, allowing sediment to settle out before discharge enters a culvert and its drainage system: 1. Install silt fence culvert protection in appropriate locations: a. Where sheet and rill erosion would occur. b. Where protection of adjacent property or areas is needed. c. Where the maximum slope length behind the silt fence is 100 feet (30 meters) and the maximum slope gradient is 50% (2:1). d. Where the flow volume does not exceed 1 cfs. e. Where ponded water will not damage adjacent areas or structures, or create a traffic hazard or other nuisance. Page 12 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-13 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project 2. Select the correct construction materials: a. Select a woven or non-woven filter fabric made of at least 85% by weight, ethylene, propylene, amide, ester, or vinylidene yarn. b. The Equivalent Opening size of the filter fabric (U.S. Standard Sieve) shall be 70- 100, and the tensile strength shall be at least 120 lbs (54 kg) if a wire support fence is used and 200 lbs (90 kg) if a wire support fence is not used. c. Posts should be either 4-inch diameter wood or 1.33 pounds per linear foot steel. Posts should be at least 5 feet long. Steel posts should have projections for fastening wire. d. Wire fence reinforcement shall be a minimum of 42 in (1.1 m) tall and a minimum width of 14-gauge. The maximum mesh spacing should be 6 in (15 cm). 3. Construct the silt fence properly: a. The height of the silt fence should be between 16 in (40 cm) and 36 in (90 cm). The most effective height range is 24 to 36 in (60 to 90 cm). Shorter fences may be breached during small discharges and require more maintenance. b. If possible, cut the filter fabric from a continuous roll to avoid the use of joints. If joints are necessary, splice the filter fabric only at a support post. Overlap the fabric pieces a minimum of 6 in (15 cm) and secure both ends to the post. c. If a wire mesh support fence is used, install posts at least 3 feet (1 meter) apart. Install posts closer together if a support fence is not used. Drive posts into the ground to a depth of at least 1 foot (30 cm). d. Excavate a 4-in (10 cm) deep trench that is at least 4 in (10 cm) wide upslope of the silt fence along the line of posts. WQ-27 Discharge Surface Protection - Armoring To protect exposed soil and vegetated surfaces from erosion during discharges by placing protective armor (e.g. plastic sheeting, cloth fabric, gravel bedding) over the erodible surface: 1. Select and install armoring materials properly: a. Choose a material whose strength is proportionate to the velocities and materials in the discharged water (e.g. sediment). b. Clear the area to be protected of rocks and debris which may puncture the armor. c. Anchor the armor using sandbags, gravel, or stakes along the perimeter. d. Anchor the armor so it can withstand movement of the discharge. e. Account for potential changes in the flow direction of the discharge when laying the armor. f. If there is to be a direct stream of high velocity flow, an energy dissipating device may be necessary to prevent failure of the armor. 2. Inspection and Maintenance: a. During the discharge, monitor the armor for failure (tearing) and erosion at the edges of the armor. b. If erosion does occur, implement sediment/turbidity control measures. c. Remove armor when the discharge is complete. d. Sweep up any sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. e. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. Page 13 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-14 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project WQ-28 Discharge Surface Protection Flow Diversion To protect bare soil and vegetated surfaces from erosion by diverting, channeling, or temporarily piping flows over erodible areas to protected areas not subject to erosion: 1. When considering the use of flow diversion, take into account the following: a. There must be a storm drain or paved surface nearby to which the discharge can be diverted. b. The flow channel must be aligned to avoid disruption of traffic, or traffic control measures must be used. c. The flow channel must have sufficient slope to allow the discharge to flow to the storm drain or paved surface. d. The flow channel must be designed to handle the anticipated flow rate. e. Protective armor or temporary piping can be used for high velocity discharges or large flow volume discharges over bare soils or vegetated surfaces. The armor material selected must be able to withstand the flow velocity and movement of the discharge. 2. Divert flows correctly: a. Divert water to a channel using fixed or flexible piping, or another system to capture this flow (e.g. sand bags). b. If armor is used to create a flow channel over the erodible surface clear the area to be protected of rocks and debris which may puncture the armor. c. Anchor the armor using sandbags, gravel, or stakes along the perimeter. d. If there is to be a direct stream of high velocity flow, an energy dissipating device may be necessary to prevent failure of the armor. 3. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Inspect the area for flooding resulting from failure of the channel diversion structure or the flow rate exceeding the diversion channel capacity. b. Inspect the channel for erosion along the edges due to overtopping of the channel. c. Monitor the armor for failure (tearing) and erosion at the edges of the armor. d. If erosion does occur along the edges of the channel or armor, implement sediment/turbidity control measures. e. Remove armor when the discharge is complete. f. Sweep up any sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. g. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-29 Discharge Storm Drain Curb & Drop Inlet Protection To install temporary devices around drain inlets using gravel, wire mesh, and /or concrete blocks that may prevent sediment-laden runoff from entering the storm drain system or watercourses (These devices reduce the velocity of runoff, allowing sediments to settle. The gravel can also filter out coarse sediment from runoff.): 1. Use drain inlet protection in appropriate locations: a. Use in drainage areas less than one acre. b. Place anywhere sediment-laden runoff could discharge into a storm drain inlet. c. If the inlet protection device could pond water, install only where ponded water will not contact materials, flood structures, or cause a nuisance. Page 14 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-15 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project d. Completely cover inlet where work activities could result in vegetation, raw materials or sediment being deposited into the inlet, or when a small spill occurs near the inlet. Cover inlets with rubber or polyurethane mats, or plastic sheeting anchored with gravel bags. 2. Install inlet protection properly: a. To prevent seepage of sediment-laden runoff into he drain inlet, install drain inlet protection so there are no gaps around the drain inlet. b. Do not place filter fabric over the inlet grate as it can become clogged with sediment and contribute to flooding. 3. Gravel and Wire Mesh Drop Inlet Protection: a. Place wire mesh over the inlet so the wire extends a minimum of 12 inches beyond each side of the inlet structure. Use hardware cloth or comparable wire mesh with ½-inch openings. If more than one mesh strip is required, overlap the strips. b. Pile ¾ to 3-inch washed gravel on top of the mesh surrounding the inlet to a minimum depth of 12 inches. Extend the gravel at least 18 inches beyond the inlet on all sides. 4. Gravel and Wire Mesh Curb Inlet Protection: a. Place wire mesh over the inlet so the wire extends a minimum of 12 inches beyond each side of the inlet structure. Use hardware cloth or comparable wire mesh with ½-inch openings. b. Pile ¾ to 3-inch washed gravel against the mesh to anchor it against the gutter and inlet cover and to surround the inlet completely. 5. Block and Gravel Curb Inlet Protection: a. Place two concrete blocks on their sides abutting the curb at either side of the inlet opening. These are the space blocks. b. Place a 2-inch by 4-inch stud through the outer holes of each spacer block to align the front blocks. c. Place more concrete blocks on their sides across the front of the inlet and abutting the spacer blocks. Do not use mortar. d. Place wire mesh with ½-inch openings over the outside vertical face of the blocks to keep gravel out of the inlet. e. Place ¾ to 3-inch washed gravel against the wire mesh to the top of the blocks, on slopes of 2:1 or flatter. 6. Block and Gravel Drop Inlet Protection: a. Place wire mesh over the inlet so the wire extends a minimum of 12 inches beyond each side of the inlet structure. Use hardware cloth or comparable wire mesh with ½-inch openings. If more than one mesh strip is required, overlap the strips. b. Place concrete blocks lengthwise on their sides in a single row around the perimeter of the inlet, so the open end face outward not upward. Abut the ends of the adjacent blocks. c. Stack blocks to at least 12 inches but not more than 24 inches above the inlet, depending on design requirements. d. Place wire mesh with ½-inch openings over the outside vertical face of the blocks to keep gravel out of the inlet. Page 15 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-16 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project e. Place ¾ to 3-inch washed gravel against the wire mesh to the top of the blocks, on slopes of 2:1 or flatter. 7. Gravel Bag Barriers: a. Use bags made of geotextile fabric, not burlap. Fill bags with washed ¾-inch rock or ¼-inch pea gravel. b. Place gravel bags around the perimeter of the drop inlet, packing bags together tightly. For a cub inlet, abut the curb at either side of the inlet opening. c. If additional flow retention is required, construct a barrier upgradient of the inlet by placing gravel bags perpendicular to the direction of flow. Overlap the bags and pack them tightly together. Construct each barrier using several layers of bags. Leave a one bag gap on the top row to act as a spillway to prevent flooding. If more than one barrier is used, place barriers at 20-foot intervals. 8.Wooden Weir (and Fabric) Curb Inlet Protection: a. Construct a wooden weir using 2-inch by 4-inch construction grade lumber, with a total length equal to the throat length plus 2 feet. b. Attach a continuous piece of wire mesh of at least 30 inches in width and a length equal to the throat length plus 4 feet. c. Place a piece of approved filter cloth, equal to the dimensions of the wire mesh, over the mesh and secure it to the weir. d. Nail the weir to the 9-inch long vertical spacers, which shall be located between the weir and the inlet face at no more than 6-foot intervals. e. Place the assembly against the inlet throat and nail 2-inch by 4-inch boards, in minimum lengths of 2 feet, to the top of the weir at the spacers. Extend these anchors across the inlet tops and hold them in place by sandbags or alternate weight. f. Place the assembly such that the end spacers are at lest 1 foot beyond both ends of the throat opening. g. Form the mesh and cloth to the concrete gutter and against the face of the curb on both sides of the inlet. Place coarse aggregate over the mesh and cloth so that water is prevented from entering the inlet either under or around the filter fabric. 9.Inspection and Maintenance: a. Let ponded water evaporate provided it does not cause a nuisance. b. Inspect before anticipated storms and after storms for gaps, clogging of gravel, ruptured gravel bags, and sediment accumulated behind inlet protection. During extended rainfall events, inspect at least once every 24 hours. c. Carefully remove accumulated sediment when the depth reaches half the height of the inlet protection device. Dispose of sediment properly. d. Clean or replace gravel that is clogged with sediment. Do not clean gravel near the inlet. WQ-30 Discharging to Sanitary Sewer System To prevent sediments from entering local creeks and the bay by removing pollutants in the wastewater treatment processes: 1. Obtain necessary approval from wastewater treatment plant or sanitary sewer agency: Page 16 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-17 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project a. Obtain approval or permit for a one-time discharge, or b. Obtain approval or permit for annual or ongoing discharge. 2. Design Considerations: a. Determine the feasibility of implementing this control measure by identifying access to a sanitary manhole near the discharge location. b. Construct discharge system with an air gap between the outlet pipe of the discharge line and the sewerage. If an adequate air gap cannot be maintained at all times to prevent cross contamination, select another control measure. c. Develop adequate traffic control plan and implement it prior to the discharge operation. Typically, sanitary sewer manholes are located in traffic lanes. Discharging to these manholes will cause a disruption of the vehicular traffic flow. d. Obtain a confined-space entry permit if it is necessary to enter a manhole. 3. Construction Specifications: a. Maintain flow within the limits that are acceptable to the local sanitary sewer agencies. b. Direct the discharge water to the sanitary sewer system by fixed piping, flexible piping, or a system to capture surface flow discharging (e.g. sand bags). c. Install the piping outlet above the manhole at height of at least twice the diameter of the outlet pipe. d. Anchor the piping such that the energy from the discharge water will not cause the piping to thrust out of position. 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Check for leaks from the piping system. b. Observe the system in operation and make repairs as required to keep the discharge flowing into the sanitary sewer system. c. Ensure that the air gap is maintained at all times. d. Observe the water quality and record on a discharge activity checklist. e. Monitor the flow of the discharge and record on a discharge activity checklist. f. If the wastewater treatment plant or sanitary sewer agency has dictated water quality requirements, monitor accordingly. g. After the discharge has ended, remove pipe from sanitary manhole. h. Complete a discharge activity checklist and send to your unit supervisor. Include any water quality monitoring results and control measure evaluations on the checklist. i. Unit supervisors will prepare a monthly inventory of discharges and send it (along with discharge activity checklists) to the Countywide Watershed Programs Unit. j. Notify wastewater treatment plant or sanitary sewer agency that the discharge has ceased. WQ-31 Small Volume Chlorinated Discharge (less than or equal 50,000 gallons) To control chlorine in discharges that will not exceed 50,000 gallons of potable water, recycled water, or chlorinated groundwater, where chlorine concentrations do not exceed 1.5 mg/l (ppm). 1. Characterize the discharge appropriately (follow the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist to ensure the correct BMPs are used): a. Identify source of water. Page 17 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-18 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project b. Determine the volume of water to be discharged. c. Determine the chlorine concentration of the water. 2. Choose the option for discharging the water (in preferred order): a. Reuse water, either for dust suppression, irrigation, or construction compaction. b. Discharge to sanitary sewer system (requires approval from the local sanitary district). c. Discharge to storm drain system or water body. 3. Use appropriate control measures when discharging the water: a. Use sanitary sewer discharge BMPs if discharging to sanitary sewer. b. If discharging to a storm drain or creek, the chlorine concentration must not exceed detectable levels (0.2 mg/l [ppm]). Measure the chlorine concentration and neutralize the water using correct amounts of chemicals. Measure the chlorine concentration after neutralization to make sure the treatment was effective. c. If discharging to a storm drain or creek, also implement sediment/turbidity control measures. d. Monitor the flow rate and discharge duration to ensure the discharge volume does not exceed 50,000 gallons (limiting volume for this BMP). 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Before discharging any water, inspect the discharge flow path for debris and erosion, and cleanup the flow path as needed. b. Monitor the discharge to make sure it is not interfering with the normal operation of the sanitary sewer, or flooding the storm drain system. c. When the discharge is complete, inspect the flow path and receiving water (if discharging directly to a water body) for evidence of erosion or deposited sediment. d. Sweep up sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. e. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-32 Medium Volume Chlorinated Discharge (50,000 to 100,000 gallons) To control chlorine in discharges between 50,000 and 100,000 gallons of potable water, recycled water, or chlorinated groundwater, where chlorine concentrations do not exceed 1.5 mg/l (ppm). 1. Characterize the discharge appropriately (follow the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist to ensure the correct BMPs are used): a. Identify source of water. b. Determine the volume of water to be discharged. c. Determine the chlorine concentration of the water. 2. Choose the option for discharging the water (in preferred order): a. Reuse water, either for dust suppression, irrigation, or construction compaction. b. Discharge to sanitary sewer system (requires approval from the local sanitary district). c. Discharge to storm drain system or water body. 3. Use appropriate control measures when discharging the water: a. Use sanitary sewer discharge BMPs if discharging to sanitary sewer. Page 18 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-19 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project b. If discharging to a storm drain or creek, the chlorine concentration must not exceed detectable levels (0.2 mg/l [ppm]). Treat the water using one of the following methods: i. Measure the chlorine concentration and neutralize the water using the correct amounts of chemicals. Measure the chlorine concentration after neutralization to make sure no residual chlorine remains. ii. Store the chlorinated water until chlorine levels are non-detectable (less than 0.2 mg/l). Periodically measure chlorine levels during discharge to ensure that no residual chlorine remains. c. If discharging to a storm drain or water body, also implement sediment/turbidity control measures. d. Monitor the flow rate and discharge duration to ensure the discharge volume does not exceed 100,000 gallons (limiting volume for this BMP). 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Before discharging any water, inspect the discharge flow path for debris and erosion, and cleanup the flow path as needed. b. Monitor the discharge to make sure it is not interfering with the normal operation of the sanitary sewer, or flooding the storm drain system. c. When the discharge is complete, inspect the flow path and receiving water (if discharging directly to a water body) for evidence of erosion or deposited sediment. d. Sweep up sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. e. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. WQ-33 Large Volume Chlorinated Discharge (greater than 100,000 gallons) To control chlorine in discharges greater than 100,000 gallons of potable water, recycled water, or chlorinated groundwater, where chlorine concentrations do not exceed 1.5 mg/l (ppm). 1. Characterize the discharge appropriately (follow the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist to ensure the correct BMPs are used): a. Identify source of water. b. Determine the volume of water to be discharged. c. Determine the chlorine concentration of the water. 2. Choose the option for discharging the water (in preferred order): a. Reuse water, either for dust suppression, irrigation, or construction compaction. b. Discharge to sanitary sewer system (requires approval from the local sanitary district). c. Discharge to storm drain system or water body. 3. Use appropriate control measures when discharging the water: a. Use sanitary sewer discharge BMPs if discharging to sanitary sewer. b. If discharging to a storm drain or water body, the chlorine concentration must not exceed detectable levels (0.2 mg/l [ppm]). Treat the water using one of the following methods: i. Measure the chlorine concentration and neutralize the water using the correct amounts of chemicals. Measure the chlorine concentration after neutralization to make sure no residual chlorine remains. Page 19 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-20 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project ii. Store the chlorinated water until chlorine levels are non-detectable (less than 0.2 mg/l). Periodically measure chlorine levels during discharge to ensure that no residual chlorine remains. c. If discharging to a storm drain or water body, also implement sediment/turbidity control measures. 4. Inspection and Maintenance: a. Before discharging any water, inspect the discharge flow path for debris and erosion, and cleanup the flow path as needed. b. Monitor the discharge to make sure it is not interfering with the normal operation of the sanitary sewer, or flooding the storm drain system. c. When the discharge is complete, inspect the flow path and receiving water (if discharging directly to a water body) for evidence of erosion or deposited sediment. d. Sweep up sediment deposited in the flow path and dispose of appropriately. e. Complete the Planned Discharge Activities Checklist and submit it to District staff responsible for Water Utility Discharge Pollution Prevention Plan reporting. Page 20 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-21 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project Santa Clara Valley Water District Stream Maintenance Program BMPs. 2.6 Mulching Bark and other wood products shall be used as needed to prevent erosion of bare soil after construction is completed. 1. All newly planted and/or bare soil (excluding bare channel bottoms) in maintenance areas shall have a minimum 3" thick layer of bark or mulch installed except when the area is seeded. In that case, the thickness of the mulch layer shall not exceed ½ inch. 2. This bark or mulch can be ground-up woody products and/or leaves from either native material or from soil suppliers. 3. Eucalyptus trees removed due to project construction shall be chipped and used as mulch for the project. 4. Any material imported from outside the District that is to be used as mulch shall be certified as weed-free. 2.8 Replace Trees The District shall replace trees as follows: 1. Native trees that are lost to bank protection impacts shall be replaced at a 3:1 ratio and non-native trees that are lost shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. 2. Trees removed for installation of bank protection measures shall be replaced at the site, if feasible, or at the mitigation site created for that bank protection activity. 3. The Plant Selection Criteria, Planting Techniques, Maintenance, and Monitoring/Reporting protocols prescribed by the "Protocol for Revegetation Associated with Bank Protection" (Appendix E of SMP ) shall be implemented, as applicable to tree replacement. 4. Replacement of heritage-sized trees (greater than 18 inches dbh) will be consistent with local ordinances. 5. All trees will be replaced with local native tree species; oak trees shall be replaced by direct-seeding with acorns locally collected from the Stevens Creek watershed. 3.1 Minimize Impacts to Special status Plants and Animals Via Site Assessments and Avoidance Measures To avoid and minimize impacts to special-status plant and wildlife species, the work program shall be reviewed by biological staff, and each site where special status species have been found, have been known to exist in the recent past, or are likely to occur because suitable habitat exists, be visited by a biologist or qualified personnel under the direction of a biologist. For animal species the site surveys shall be no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction, to determine presence of special-status species. For mobile species (e.g. red-legged frog, western pond turtle, least vireo, steelhead), which may occur on-site during the work period, surveys be conducted as close to the start of work as is practical (no more than 7 days prior to start of work). For plant species, the surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate time of the year to determine presence. Information regarding the presence of special status species on a particular worksite shall be based on the GIS database and professional experience of qualified staff. Page 21 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-22 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project 1. The District shall use its GIS database to identify potential special-status plant and animal habitats. All projects falling within sensitive habitats shall be discussed with biological staff to identify avoidance and minimization measures. 2. All populations detected during the surveys shall be assessed and mapped. This information shall be entered into the GIS system for future management purpose. 3. Avoidance of impacts to serpentine areas or other sensitive plant habitats may include storing removed sediment offsite, limiting the method of vegetation removal to manual methods, and limiting the operation of maintenance equipment to established roads whenever possible. 4. Vegetation management in sensitive plant areas shall use only hand control or backpack herbicide application by operators trained to identify and avoid the species to be protected. 5. If sensitive animals such as western pond turtles or California red-legged frogs are found, a qualified biologist will remove them to suitable habitat outside of the project limits. Moving animals will be consistent with applicable Fish and Wildlife Service and Fish and Game permits. 6. If maintenance activities are scheduled in the vicinity of extant populations, qualified biological personnel shall clearly identify the populations on site and stake or flag a buffer zone around the population in which activities are to be avoided. 7. The results of all sensitive species surveys shall be reported to the Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and the California Department of Fish and Game in an annual report. All surveys will be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database. 8. The District shall develop and distribute informational pamphlets entitled Plants, Wildlife, and Fish at your These pamphlets are designed to inform staff about sensitive species and environmental protocols and procedures. 3.8 Minimize Effects of Bypass Structures on Steelhead 1. To prevent increases in temperature and decreases in dissolved oxygen (DO), if bypass pipes are used, they shall be properly sized (i.e., larger diameter pipes to better pass the flows). Bypass pipes may also be avoided by creating a low-flow channel or using other methods to isolate the work area. 2. In Non-tidal Areas, diversions on the Guadalupe River, Calero, Los Gatos, Guadalupe, Alamitos, Coyote, Upper Penitencia, Stevens, San Francisquito, Bodfish, Little Arthur, Uvas and Llagas Creeks shall maintain conditions required for fish passage. Diversions shall maintain fish passage when the project meets the following conditions: 1) the length of the area dewatered exceeds 500 feet, and/or 2) the length of time the stream is dewatered exceeds two weeks in length. Conditions for fish passage shall be met as long as the diversion 1) maintains contiguous flows through a low flow channel in the channel bed or an artificial open channel, 2) presents no vertical drops exceeding six (6) inches and follows the natural grade of the site, 3) maintains water velocities that shall not exceed eight feet per second (8 ft/sec), and 4) maintains adequate water depths consistent with normal conditions in the project reach. An artificial channel used for fish passage shall be lined with cobble/gravel. A closed conduit pipe shall not be used for fish Page 22 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-23 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project passage. The inlets of diversions shall be checked daily to prevent accumulation of debris. 3.12 Maintain Lowflow Fish Passage If a nontidal stream channel has been altered during the operations, its low flow channel shall be returned as nearly as possible to its approximate prior location with appropriate depth for fish passage without creating a possible future bank erosion problem. 3.15 Restore Pool Configuration of Channel Bottom The District shall re-grade the channel bottom at the end of the work project to as close to original conditions as possible. 1. In areas used for migration by salmonids as designated on the District GIS Fisheries coverage, the depth and size of the low flow channel and pools shall emulate the preconstruction conditions as closely as possible, within the finished channel topography. 2. All material used to construct temporary fills shall be removed upon completion of the project. 3.16 Restore Spawning Gravels in Work Site Areas The District shall replace gravels at the end of construction in potential salmonid spawning reaches. 1. Spawning gravels removed as a result of stream maintenance activities shall be replaced using a gravel/cobble mixture representing the size and relative abundance of gravel/cobbles present pre-project impact. 2. Spawning gravel replacement will be configured to maximize functional benefits including salmonid spawning, aquatic invertebrate production, and juvenile escape cover. 3.17 Reuse Sediments and Gravels As Appropriate Where practical, the District will reuse removed sediments and gravels. Sediments that are considered for re-use will be tested for hazardous materials and graded for structure as necessary in order to determine their appropriateness for re-use and consistency with BMPs 1.3 and 3.16. When sediments or gravels are reused, the District will ensure that the reuse does not cause any additional erosion, siltation, or other negative environmental consequences. Reuse will be considered within the context of environmental, regulatory, and fiscal consequences. 6.1 Spill Prevention The District shall prevent the accidental release of chemicals, fuels, lubricants, and non-storm drainage water into channels. 1. District field personnel shall be appropriately trained in spill prevention, hazardous material control, and clean-up of accidental spills 2. No fueling, repair, cleaning, maintenance, or vehicle washing shall be performed in the creek channel or in areas at the top of the channel bank that my flow into the creek channel. Page 23 Appendix A: Santa Clara Valley Water District Best Management Practices Page A-24 Appendix A - Best Management Practices implemented into the project 6.2 Spill Kit Location Spill prevention kits shall always be in close proximity when using hazardous materials (e.g. in crew trucks, and other logical locations). 1. Prior to entering the work site, all field personnel shall know the location of spill kits on crew trucks and at other locations within District facilities. 2. All field personnel shall be advised of these locations and trained in their appropriate use. 6.3 Hazardous Materials Management The District shall implement measures to ensure that hazardous materials are properly handled and the quality of water resources is protected by all reasonable means when removing sediments from the streams. 1. Prior to entering the work site, all field personnel shall know how to respond when toxic materials are discovered. 2. The discharge of a hazardous or non-hazardous waste as defined in Division 2, Subdivision 1, Chapter 2 of the California Code of Regulations shall be conducted in accordance with applicable State and federal regulations. 3. All handling and disposal of sediments shall be performed in accordance with the WDR issued by the RWQCB. The sediment shall be disposed of at a permitted landfill. Any alternative use or disposal shall require RWQCB approval. Page 24 City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration APPENDIX B CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN, BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-1 February 27, 2006 Ms. Christine Schneider Thomas Reid Associates 545 Middlefield Road, Suite 200 Menlo Park, CA 94025-3472 RE: Cultural Resources Assessment Including Results of Presence/Absence Archaeological Testing Revised Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan, City of Cupertino, Santa Clara County Dear Ms. Schneider, Please let this letter stand as Basin Research Associates' Cultural Resources Assessment Report for the above project located along a portion of Stevens Creek in the City of Cupertino, Santa Clara County. This report seeks to fulfill the various mandates of the California Environmental 1 Quality Act (CEQA)and other cultural resources and planning directives of the Cities of Cupertino. The report provides the results of an archival records search, reviews pertinent literature discusses the results of a field inventory of the project area and focused presence/absence archaeological testing at one prehistoric archaeological site, and presents management recommendations. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The City of Cupertino and its partner the Santa Clara Valley Water District propose to convert a commercial picnic facility into a neighborhood park, restore in-stream and riparian habitat along sections of Stevens Creek within the 100-year floodplain, enhance adjacent upland oak woodland habitat, construct a 5,900 foot all weather trail and develop a new environmental education center. The these activities will occur on approximately 60 acres of City of Cupertino and Santa Clara Valley Water District properties bordered by Stevens Creek Boulevard to the north, McClellan Road to the south and residential neighborhoods to the east and west (T 7S, R 2W, Unsectioned [part Sections 15 and 22], United States Geological Survey [hereafter USGS], 1. CEQA requires a Lead Agency to determine if a project will have a significant effect on the environment and to assess possible impacts. In terms of cultural resources, a project is considered to have a significant effect if it would disrupt or adversely affect one or more properties of historic or cultural significance to the community Guidelines (CEQA Section 21084.1 and CEQA ). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 2 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-2 Cupertino, Calif. 7.5' quadrangle topographic map, 1991; T. Reid 2005) [Figs. 1-2]. The project will include: [see Fig. 3A-D]]: In-Stream Restoration Demolition and removal of three low-flow automobile crossings and a diversion dam all of which pose significant barriers to steelhead passage. Demolition and removal of three pedestrian bridges spanning the creek. Reach A1 - Expansion of 600 feet of pool and riffle habitat and revegetation of the creek banks to create a more stabile channel with quality habitat from the demolished diversion dam to downstream of the first low flow crossing. Reach A2 - Removal of 500 feet of large boulders installed as emergency flood protection. Laying back and revegetation of this section of the east bank of the creek to create a more stabile channel with higher quality habitat. Reach A2 - Realignment of 450 feet of the stream channel along Horseshoe Bend to reduce erosion and undercutting of the bank. Development of pool and riffle habitat, revegetation of the creek banks throughout this new channel. Reach B - Realignment of 850 feet of the stream channel through the current parking area to lengthen and stabilize the channel. Development of pool and riffle habitat, revegetation of the creek banks throughout this new channel. This area includes the section of the creek from the second low flow crossing through the third low flow crossing. Reach B - Conversion of a portion of the former creek channel to include filling 650 feet and creating 200 feet backwater wetland habitat where the new channel meets the original streambed. Reach C - Construction of new 600-foot stream channel through Stocklmeir orange orchard to reduce erosion and undercutting of the bank along the golf course. Development of four step pools and seven pool and riffle sequences, planting the west bank this new channel. This channel uses the existing west bank as the east bank of the new channel. Reach C Conversion of 600 feet of the former creek channel through removal of riprap and shotcrete and creation of willow swale in old channel. Riparian habitat planting along the new channel and segments of the existing 1.15 miles of the creek. Picnic Area and Pool Complex Improvements Closure and conversion of a 100 day/year, 4,000-person, 1,100 festival-style parking commercial picnic facility situated on both the east and west banks of the creek. Reopening of this facility as a 100day/year, 800-person picnic facility consolidated to the west bank with a 350-vehicle festival-style, permeable parking area with native riparian shade trees. Opening of Blackberry Farm 365 days a year as a neighborhood park. Elimination of a day use fee for casual visitors. Retention of the day use fee for picnic reservation and use of the swimming pool complex. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 3 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-3 Upgrades to this picnic area including new underground utilities, central catering building, barbecues, removable picnic tables, horseshoe pits, two half courts for basketball and a sand volleyball court. Upgrades to existing pool restrooms to serve both pool and picnic needs new stalls, entries and walkways. New pool entrance kiosk with walkway to bridge to picnic area. New pool fencing and paving stones. Construction of a 14-foot wide pedestrian/bicycle/light duty vehicle bridge spanning the creek between the pool and picnic facility. Park Entrance Improvements Demolition of existing park office/entry building. New park entry kiosk. Conference center landscaping and 5 vehicle parking area. New buffer landscaping around adjacent private residence. Stevens Creek Trail Construction of an 8-foot wide pedestrian and bicycle trail extending 5,900 feet from Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Road. Trail will be constructed with an all-weather surface for bikes, strollers and walkers. th Construction of an 8-foot wide pedestrian/bicycle bridge spanning the creek near the 8 hole on the golf course. A recurved fence will be installed in this short segment of the trail to protect users from errant golf balls. Demolition and expansion of sidewalk along Stevens Creek Blvd. to serve as Class I trail into Stocklmeir property. On-street improvements begin at crosswalk at Phar Lap Drive and end at existing pedestrian bridge that parallels Stevens Creek Blvd. Relocation and enhancement of some community garden plots and 4-H facilities to make way for the trail at McClellan Ranch. Creation of a 17-car trailhead staging area with a remodeled restroom in the location of the existing parking lot upstream of the pool that currently accommodates 200 plus vehicles. Demolition of approximately 32,000 square feet of excess parking paving. Creation of a 5-foot wide pedestrian and bicycle access trail extending 400 feet from San Fernando Avenue along the golf course into the park. Restriping of the Blue Pheasant parking area to increase parking capacity from 91 spaces to 123 spaces. Environmental Education Center/Pole Barn Construction of a 2,000 square foot environmental education center with 2 classrooms, an office and restrooms to be built on an existing building pad formerly occupied by a doublewide trailer in McClellan Ranch. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 4 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-4 Upland Habitat Restoration Restoration of the upland oak woodland habitat in closed picnic areas and in and around updated picnic areas and the trail. Maintenance Facilities Demolition of a golf course maintenance facility perched on the east bank of the creek. Construction of a new 3,000 square foot golf course maintenance facility with a 2,000 square feet fenced yard below the Conference Center along the existing golf course fence line. Demolition of park maintenance facility and yard located behind the adjacent private residence. Construction of a new 1,200 square foot park maintenance facility with a 1,200 square feet fenced yard behind the adjacent private residence. Irrigation System Demolition of water storage tank that retains well water used to irrigate the golf course and reconditioning of a 35,000-gallon cistern to serve golf course and park irrigation needs. REGULATORY BACKGROUND The regulatory framework that mandates consideration of cultural resources in project planning includes federal, state, and local governments. Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, districts, and objects; standing historic structures, buildings, districts, and objects; and locations of important historic events or sites of traditional and/or cultural importance to various groups. Cultural resources may be determined significant or potentially significant in terms of national, state, or local criteria either individually or in combination. Resource evaluation criteria are determined by the compliance requirements of a specific project. California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a review to determine if the project will have a significant effect on archaeological sites or properties of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic group eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The CRHR (Section 5024.1) is a listing of those properties that are to be protected from substantial adverse change, and it includes properties that are listed, or have been formally determined to be eligible for listing in, the NRHP, State Historical Landmarks, and eligible Points of Historical Interest. A historical resource may be listed in the CRHR if it meets one or more of the following criteria: it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; it is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 5 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-5 it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or it has yielded or has the potential to yield information important in the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Historical Resources Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21084.1 stipulates that any resource listed in, or eligible for listing in, the CRHR is presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Resources listed in a local historic register or deemed significant in a historical resource survey (as provided under PRC Section 5024.1g) are presumed historically or culturally significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates they are not. A resource that is not listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the CRHR, not included in a local register or historic resources, or not deemed significant in a historical resource survey may nonetheless be historically significant (PRC Section 21084.1). This provision is intended to give the Lead Agency discretion to determine that a resource of historic significance exists where none had been identified before and to apply the requirements of PRC Section 21084.1 to properties that have not previously been formally recognized as historic. CEQA equates a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource with a significant effect on the environment (PRC Section 21084.1) and defines substantial adverse change as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration that would impair historical significance (PRC Section 5020.1). Archaeological Resources Where a project may adversely affect a unique archaeological resource, PRC Section 21083.2 requires the Lead Agency to treat that effect as a significant environmental effect. When an archaeological resource is listed in or is eligible to be listed in the CRHR, PRC Section 21084.1 requires that any substantial adverse effect to that resource be considered a significant environmental effect. PRC Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 operate independently to ensure that potential effects on archaeological resources are considered as part of a project's environmental analysis. Either of these benchmarks may indicate that a project may have a potential adverse effect on archaeological resources. Other California Laws and Regulations Other state-level requirements for cultural resources management appear in the California PRC Chapter 1.7, Section 5097.5 Paleontological, and Historical and Chapter 1.75 beginning at Section 5097.9 American Hi lands owned by the state or a state agency. The disposition of Native American burials is governed by Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and sections 5097.94 and 5097.98 of the PRC, and falls within the jurisdiction of the NAHC. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 6 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-6 City of Cupertino The General Plan Draft of the City of Cupertino in the Land Use Element has several policies to protect historically and archaeologically significant structures, sites and artifacts (also see Figure 2-G, Historic Resources in the General Plan). These area: Policy 2-59: Landmark Rehabilitation. Undertake an active partnership with private owners of landmark structures to rehabilitate the buildings for public or semi-private occupancy in order to retain their historic character. StrategyFlexible Standards : . Allow flexible interpretation of zoning ordinance and building code standards not essential to public health and safety. These could include reduced on-site parking provisions or lesser setback distances. Policy 2-60 Archaeologically Sensitive Areas. Protect archaeologically sensitive areas. StrategyDevelopment Investigation. : Require an investigation for development proposed in areas likely to be archaeologically sensitive, such as along stream courses and in oak groves, to determine if significant archaeological resources may be affected by the project. Also require appropriate mitigation measures in project design. Policy 2-61: Native American Burials. Protect Native American burial sites. Strategy : Upon discovery of such burials during construction, take action prescribed by State law, including stoppage of work in surrounding area, notification of appropriate authorities and reburial of remains in an appropriate manner. RESEARCH SOURCES CONSULTED SOURCES CONSULTED A prehistoric and historic site record and literature search was conducted by the California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center, California State 2 University Sonoma, Rohnert Park (CHRIS/NWIC File No. 04-996).Reference material from the Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley and Basin Research Associates, San 3 Leandro was also consulted. 2. Dated May 23, 2005. Historic Properties Directory 3. Specialized listings consulted included the for Santa Clara County (CAL/OHP 2005a) with the most recent updates of the National Register of Historic Places; California Historical Landmarks (CAL/OHP 1990); and, California Points of Historical Interest (CAL/OHP 1992); as well as other evaluations of properties reviewed by the State of California Office of Historic Preservation. Additional sources consulted California History Plan California Inventory of Historic Resources include: the (CAL/OHP 1973); (CAL/OHP Five Views: An Ethnic Sites Survey for California Archeological Determinations of 1976); (CAL/OHP 1988); Eligibility Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks of San Francisco and Northern (CAl/OHP 2005b) and, BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 7 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-7 AGENCIES, GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS CONSULTED The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted in regard to resources listed on the Sacred Lands Inventory (Busby 2005). The review was negative (Pilas-Treadway 2005). Ms. Vera Gill, Community Development Department, Planning Division, (408) 777-3308, personal communication 5/25/05) was contacted regarding City of Cupertino historic properties/cultural ordinances and lists of landmarks, potential cultural resources, historic properties, etc. The City has no preservation ordinance. Figure 2G in the 2005 City of Cupertino Draft General Plan provides a listing of Historic Sites and their approximate locations. 4 Mrs. Barbara Banfield, Staff Naturalist, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society (SCVAS)at McClellan Ranch (22221 McClellan Road) provided Mr. Christopher Canzonieri, Basin Research archaeologist with a brief tour of Blackberry Farm (21975 San Fernando Avenue) to show him several prehistoric stone bowl-like objects embedded within walls at the farm. She also noted that the original creek may have meandered through the Blackberry Farm parking lot on San Fernando Avenue. No local historical societies were contacted regarding a review of local landmarks, potential historic sites or structures. SUMMARY CONTEXT NATIVE AMERICAN Prehistoric The project area is within the watershed of Stevens Creek (also known as Cupertino Creek) with Calabazas, Stevens, and Permenente creeks the principal drainage channels in the study area. Permanente Creek is located about 1.25 miles west of the project, Regnart Creek is about 1.25 miles east of the project, and Calabazas Creek is located approximately 2.25 miles east of the project. The area would have provided a favorable environment during the prehistoric period with riparian, bay and inland resources available to the aboriginal population either in the area or within a short distance. Native American occupation and use of the general area appears to extend over 5000-7000 years and may be longer. Sites appear to have been selected for accessibility, protection from seasonal flooding, and the availability of resources. Watercourses and associated small basins and other slight topographic depressions were foci of prehistoric occupation. Native American groups exploited a variety of ecological niches on the low grasslands of the alluvial plain dotted with spring-fed marshes and basins and the adjacent foothills. Archaeological information suggests an increase in the prehistoric population over time with an increasing focus on permanent California (American Society of Civil Engineers 1977) and other local and regional surveys/inventories, lists, and ephemera (see REFERENCES CITED AND CONSULTED). 4. McClellan Ranch, Santa Clara Audubon Society, 22221 McClellan Road, Cupertino, CA 95014; (408) 252- 3747; scvas@scvas.org BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 8 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-8 settlements with large populations in later periods. This change from hunter-collectors to an increased sedentary lifestyle is due to more efficient resource procurement but with a focus on staple food exploitation, the increased ability to store food at village locations, and the development of increasing complex social and political systems including long-distance trade networks. General overviews and perspectives on the regional prehistory including chronological sequences can be found in C. King (1978a), Moratto (1984), Elsasser (1978, 1986) and, Allen et al. (1999). ETHNOGRAPHIC The aboriginal inhabitants of the Santa Clara Valley belonged to a group known as the "Costanoan", derived from the Spanish word Costanos ("coast people" or "coastal dwellers") who occupied the central California coast as far east as the Diablo Range. The descendants of these Native Americans now prefer to be called Ohlone (Galvan 1967/1968; Margolin 1978). In 1770 the Costanoan lived in approximately 50 separate and politically autonomous tribelets with each group having one or more permanent villages surrounded by a number of temporary camps. Physiographic features usually defined the territory of each group which generally supported a population of approximately 200 persons with a range of between 50-500 individuals (Kroeber 1925:462; Levy 1978:485, 487; Hart 1987:112-113). Tribelet boundaries and village locations are inexact due to incomplete historic records, and they remain a subject of anthropological contention and debate. The project area is within the territory of the Tamyen (Tamien) tribelet of the Costanoan Indians (alternatively the Ohlone). The closest Tamien village and/or village/region have been identified as San Jose Cupertino 5 (Kroeber 1925:465, Fig. 42; Levy 1978:485, Fig. 1, #11; Milliken 1995:229, Map 5, 256King 6 1994:205, Fig. 7).Milliken (1995:250) places the village of Partacsi, tribe unknown, in the Saratoga gap area in the mountains and valleys of upper Pescadero Creek, Stevens Creek, and Saratoga Creek watersheds. No major prehistoric/protohistoric trails have been identified in or near the project. However, it is likely that a trail ran along Stevens Creek; an inferred trail has been mapped along Los Gatos Creek about 4.5 miles east of the project (Elsasser 1986:48, Table 4, #1; Figure 10). Historic accounts of the distribution of these Costanoan tribelets and villages in the 1770s-1790s and the results of archaeological efforts in the area suggest that a number of tribelets may have had temporary camps within the vicinity of the project area throughout the prehistoric period and into the Hispanic period. The Costanoan aboriginal lifeway apparently disappeared by 1810 due Tamien 5. Milliken places the along the Guadalupe River from Agnews to the Downtown San Jose and the flat San lands westward from the Guadalupe to present-day Cupertino on upper Stevens Creek and does not refer to Jose Cupertino . San Jose Cupertino Ritocsi 6. King (1978b:437-438, Fig. 54) refers to the tribelet and the village of in the general Ritocsi area. In contrast, Milliken (1995:252) places the in the upper drainage of the Guadalupe River and central part of Coyote Creek from downtown San Jose south to New Almaden. Hylkema (1995:35-36, Map 6) Werwersen refers to the district of San Jose Cupertino in the Saratoga and Cupertino and the "people of " Ritocsi including the village of . BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 9 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-9 the introduction of European diseases, a declining birth rate, and the impact of the mission system. The Costanoan were transformed from hunters and gatherers into agricultural laborers (and in some cases, craft artisans) who lived at the missions and worked with former neighboring groups such as the Esselen, Yokuts, and Miwok (Levy 1978:486). For a more extensive review of Santa Clara Valley Native Americans see Kroeber (1925:462- 473), Harrington (1942), Galvan (1967/1968), King and Hickman (1973), C. King (1974, 1978b), Levy (1978), Bean (1994), and Milliken (1995). HISTORIC ERA RESOURCES HISPANIC PERIOD The Spanish philosophy of government in northwestern New Spain was directed at the founding of presidios, missions, and secular towns with the land held by the Crown (1769-1821) while the later Mexican policy stressed individual ownership of the land (Findlay 1980). During the Mexican Period (1822-1846/1848) vast tracts of land were granted to individuals (Hart 1987). Between 1769 and 1776 a number of Spanish expeditions passed through Costanoan territory, including those led by Portola, Fages, Fages and Crespi, Anza, Rivera, and Moraga (Beck and Haase 1974:#17, 20-21; Levy 1978:486). In particular, Portola-Crespi in 1769; Fernando Javier y Moncada Rivera and Father Francisco Palou in 1774, Bruno de Hezeta-Palou in 1775, and Anza and Font in 1776 passed through the general project area (James and McMurry 1933:btwn 12-13; Rambo and Stocklmeir ca. 1971-1972:60; Beck and Haase 1974:#17). The favorable reports of Anza and Font led to the establishment of both Mission Santa Clara and the Pueblo de San Jose in 1777. Mission Santa Clara de Asis founded on January 12, 1777, the eighth of the 21 missions in California would have been the mission with the greatest impact on the aboriginal population living in the project vicinity (Hart 1987:324; Spearman 1963:15). Locations were selected with the purpose of conducting expeditions against hostile Indians as well as a place to convert them (James and McMurry 1933:8; Beck and Haase 1974:#16-17, 19; Levy 1978:486; Hart 1987:322-324, 489-490). During the Mexican Period (1822 to 1846/1848) and into the American Period, the area within the project on the west side of Stevens Creek was within the Rancho San Antonio, granted by Governor Juan B. Alvarado to Prado Mesa on March 24, 1839 and patented to William A. Dana, Hendry F. Dana and James W. Weeks on December 18, 1857 for 3,541.90 acres. The closest rancho features such as dwellings, corrals, roads etc. were located in the northern part of the rancho which was patented to Encarnacio Mesa et al. on August 6, 1866 for 898.41 acres. None 7 of the features were within the project(Tracy 1857a-b; Hendry and Bowman 1940:895-897; Hoover et al. 1966:437; USGS Cupertino, Calif. 1980). 7. Note: The 1857 Tracy rancho plats show American Period features: "Capt Steven's House" or "St two fields, and a road on the west side of Cupertino Creek (Stevens Creek; Tracy 1857a-b). He was captain of wagon train 1844 Townsend-Stephens-Murphy Party (Loomis 1985:87). The Murphy-Shallenberger- Greenwood-Townsend party in Rambo and Stocklmeir (ca. 1971-1972:64). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 10 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-10 AMERICAN PERIOD th In the mid-19century, the majority of the rancho and pueblo lands and some of the ungranted land in California were subdivided as the result of population growth, the American takeover, and the confirmation of property titles. Growth can be attributed to the Gold Rush (1848), followed by the completion of the transcontinental railroad (1869) and local railroads. Still later, the development of the refrigerator railroad car (ca. 1880s) used for the transport of agricultural produce to distant markets, had a major impact on the Santa Clara Valley. During the later American Period and into the Contemporary Period (ca. 1876-1940s), fruit production became a major industry. This predominance of fruit production/processing held steady until after World War II. Within the Santa Clara Valley, the City of San Jose served as a County seat, a primary service as well as financial and social center. Most of the institutions for higher education and the citizen elite resided in San Jose or its twin, the city of Santa Clara. This agrarian land-use pattern with the former "chief city" of the City of San Jose and isolated "settlement clusters" located at crossroads with services (e.g., Cupertino, Evergreen, Gubserville, Coyote, and Milpitas) has been gradually displaced by residential housing, commercial centers, and the development of research and development and manufacturing associated with the electronics industry leading to the designation of the general region as the "Silicon Valley" (Broek 1932:76-83; Hart 1987). Project Area Reportedly Elisha Stephens (Stevens) arrived in the project study area in the 1840s; documents indicate his presence in 1852. He settled on what was known as Cupertino Creek and later as Stevens Creek. Between 1850-1880, Stevens Creek Road was the principal road from Stevens Creek and the west side of the Santa Clara Valley to the City of San Jose. Although viticulture was introduced early in the area by Elisha Stevens, the project area was generally characterized by mostly huge ranches in the 1870s. In the early 1880s, the area was almost entirely planted with grain, vineyards, and some prunes. As a result of the vines planted between 1880-1885, the area became dependent on viticulture between 1880-1890 and even after the infestation and destruction of vines by the phylloxera parasite between 1895-1900. Viticulture along with mixed agriculture and horticulture was important until the introduction of prohibition (1920-1933). 8 The name "Cupertino" was used by John T. Doyle, owner of 321 acres in 1880for the Cupertino Wine Company located near present-day McClellan Road and Foothill Boulevard in 9 the vicinity Stevens Creek.A post office was established in May 1882 at "Cupertino" on McClellan Road, discontinued in June 1894, and re-established in July 1900. Meanwhile a store 8. 1882 (Rambo and Stocklmeir ca. 1971-1972:64). 9. By 1888 he built a second winery near the first, "Las Palmas W He was noted for his modern, automated facility and prize winning vintages until the 1906 earthquake. He died later in 1906; his family sold the vineyards to developers in 1912 (Sullivan 1982:50-51). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 11 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-11 at "Westside", about 1.75 mile east of the project at the "Crossroads" or "Corners", the intersection at present-day Stevens Creek and DeAnza Boulevards (former Saratoga Sunnyvale Road), provided postal services from July 1892 until July 1900. In 1896, "West Side" was the service center of what was to become Cupertino. West Side had a general merchandise store, town hall, church, blacksmith shop, a post office, a cooper and a telephone office. In July 1900, the post office moved to and its name was changed to By 1904, the name "Cupertino" was applied to The Crossroads/"West Side" as well as the post office. In early 1907, the interurban Peninsular Railroad opened its Cupertino branch between the City of San Jose and Monta Vista [sic] which ran along San Carlos Street and Stevens Creek Road. Later in March 1910, a high-speed double-track line ran along from Stevens Creek Road from Monta Vista Junction to Meridian Corners (Stevens Creek Road and Saratoga Avenue). Between 1912-1914, a local real estate boom centered at Monta Vista, an unincorporated development bounded on the east side by Bryne Avenue west of the project on the Southern Pacific rail line constructed in 1906. At the time, Monte Vista was a mile west of Cupertino and considered to be ". . . little more than a station on the Peninsular Railway." Cupertino was incorporated in October 1955; at the time the city consisted of 3.76 square miles (San Jose Mercury 1896:133; USGS 1899 [surveyed 1895]; Hoover et al. 1966:459; Sawyer 1922:305 [quote]; Baltzer 1969 [1887 map]; McCaleb 1969:55, 58, 71; Rambo and Stocklmeir ca. 1971- 1972:66-69; McArthur and Fuller 1975:3, 56, 135; Stocklmeir 1975:120-127; Sullivan 1982:47, 50-53; Rambo 1984:101, 190; Patera 1991:51, 230; Walker 1994:Map CA-13; Laffey 1996:1/S- 18893). Project Specific Historic Map Review Captain Elisha Stephens reportedly settled on Cupertino Creek in 1849 or 1850. He did not own the property initially as indicated by his 1852-1852 assessment for improvements only (Laffey 1996:1/S-18893 [specific location of improvements not stated]). Tracy's 1857 Plat of San Antonio Rancho showing [sic] the part finally confirmed to Wm A. Dana et al. shows a number of features adjacent to the west bank of Cupertino Creek: a "Field" in the vicinity of present-day Stocklmeir Court; and, a "Road" on the north side of a "Field" in the present-day Scenic Circle area with "Capt Steven's House" [a square] just southwest of Scenic Circle, opposite present-day McClellan Ranch Park. The road noted on the plat would have 10 crossed the creek (Tracy 1857b). No documents discussing Stephens in regard to the east side of Stevens Creek are known. However, Stephens was assessed for improvements in 1862 on a 160-acre parcel bounded on the south by McClellan. This property may possibly refer to a quarter section on the east bank of the creek without clear title. Alternatively, this assessment could also refer to his house (property) on the opposite, west bank of the creek (e.g., Tracy 1875a-b plats; Laffey 1996:1-4, Fig. 3/S- 18893). San Antonio Rancho 10. The Plat of finally confirmed to the Heirs of Prado Mesa showing the part not confirmed to Wm A. Dana et al. is similar and shows and labels "Cupertino Creek" and "Steven's" and shows, but does not label, the fields and road (Tracy 1857a). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 12 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-12 Property ownership, circa 1857-1881 within the project alignment as mapped by Laffey (1996:1- 4, 8, Figs. 3, 5/S-18893) includes: west side [small part east side within former rancho] 155.57 acres from J. Clark to E. Stephen's and then E. Stephens to W.T. McClellan on the west side of Stevens Creek Road (Boulevard) to just south of present-day Scenic Circle in about 1864? (date approximate); 580.65 acres from Dana to J. Clarke; east side: 160 acres U.S. (United States) to G. McCauley from Stevens Creek Road to ? (unnamed road; includes parts of Sections 14-15 and 22-23 of T 7S R 2W; 160 acres U.S. to Wallace McClellan; and 15 acres including the present- 11 day McClellan Ranchfrom William T. and Eveline E. McClellan to Joseph McClellan). Healey's 1866 Official Map of the County of Santa Clara is more schematic and shows a structure labeled "Stephens" (e.g., Stevens) on the west bank of Cupertino Creek (Stevens Creek) opposite Stevens Creek Road (unlabeled) opposite the creek. The 1866 Government Land Office survey plat for Township 7 South Range 2 West (T 7S R 2W 12 MDM&B) includes a "House", presumably the former Stephens house,with a "Field" adjacent on the west side of "Cupertino Creek" in the NE 1/4 of Section 22 (within former Rancho San Antonio). A "Road from [incomplete]" is shown crossing the creek to the house and away from the field. In addition, a much larger "Field" is shown mostly north of the project on the east side of Stevens Creek from about present-day Stevens Creek Boulevard north to about the north end of Florence Drive (along N 1/2 of 14-15 Section line). A very small portion of the field is shown south of present-day Stevens Creek Boulevard adjacent to the east side of the creek in the project. In addition, other roads are shown on the plat and include a "Road from Blackberry to Saratoga" and "Saratoga to Santa Clara" east of the project. 13 Thompson and West's 1876 Historical Atlas of Santa Clara Countyshows "Stevens Creek Road" (present-day Stevens Creek Boulevard). The project area on the west side of "Stevens Creek or Cupertino Creek", from north-to-south was within a 90-acre parcel with a building near the creek owned by L. Moore, a 60-acre parcel owned by W.T. McClelan [sic]; and part of a 35- acre parcel owned by L. Seelinger whose building(s) was located south of the project boundary. The east side of the creek in the project had a 70-acre "N. Hayes Blackberry Farm" parcel with three building about midway near the creek and a small parcel with a building owned by "F.W.W." (Thompson and West 1876:33). By 1885, as shown on Barinard's 1885 Map of Cupertino, "Cupertino" included both sides of Cupertino Creek (Stevens Creek) slightly north McClellan Road which had been extended and 11. And also the adjacent 26 acres on south side of McClellan Road. sic] 12. Capt. Elisha Stephens [homesteaded 160-acres which he called "Blackberry Farm" in 1848 near/along "His first cabin was too close to the creek and was swept away in a winter flood. present-day Stevens Creek. The second cabin on higher ground He moved to what is now Bakersfield in 1864 (Pace 1975:19, #2; Loomis 1985:87). 13. This map is very problematic. The creek configuration differs substantially and section lines used as points of reference result in Stevens Creek being located mostly west of the present-day alignment of the creek. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 13 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-13 14 now crossed the creek.This map shows "J.T. Doyle 150 A [acres] [Las] Palmas" near and adjacent to the west side of Cupertino Creek (Stevens Creek) from Stevens Creek Road (Boulevard) and McClellan road with the northernmost bend in the creek occupied by a small 3- 15 acre parcel owned by "J.D.W.". The east side included a 55-acre parcel owned by G.J. Byrne [Blackberry farm in 1876] which terminated at the point where McClellan Road proceeds south/southeasterly. J.T. Doyle owned the parcel between the creek and McClellan Road and McClellan owned a 13-acre parcel [now part of McClellan Ranch Park]. Three buildings are shown on both sides of the creek: one is in the project on the west side of the creek in the vicinity 16 of Scenic Circleand two within a J.T. Doyle parcel on the east side of the creek are approximately opposite Monta Vista High School [Note: both are outside of the project, west of present-day Linda Vista Drive if it was extended north across McClellan Road]. The 1899 USGS topographic map shows only the isolated "West Side", at The Crossroads (or The Corners"), about 1.75 miles east of the project at the intersection at present-day Stevens Creek and DeAnza boulevards (former Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road). In contrast, the 1943 US War Department topographic map shows "Cupertino" in this location and "Monta Vista" just east of the project on either side of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and Stevens Road (present- day Stevens Creek Boulevard). Both "Cupertino" and "Monta Vista" appear on revised USGS topographic maps (USGS 1973, 1980, 1991; US War Dept 1943 [photography 1937, 1940]). By 1973, the study area was subject to subdivision and development as part of the general pattern of growth throughout the Santa Clara Valley. Between 1973 and 1980, streets east of Scenic Boulevard were constructed including Stocklmeir Court, Dean Court, Adelheid Court, and . Scenic Circle ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD INVENTORIES PRIOR FIELD RESEARCH Previous archaeological fieldwork included a survey of portions of the project as part of the Kaiser Cement Property (Holman 1988/S-10471) and the Summer Dams Project (Cartier et al. 1994a/S-16730). Both surveys were negative. CURRENT FIELD INVENTORY An archaeological field inventory of selected areas within the project area was completed by Basin Research archaeologist Mr. Christopher Canzonieri (M.A.) on May 4, 2005. The inventory focused on the proposed route of the bicycle and pedestrian trail [see Fig. 3] and did not cover the developed areas of the project these areas included the existing golf course, picnic and maintenance areas, the developed area on the north fronting on Stevens Creek 14. This map shows considerable change in the alignment of the creek from Stevens Creek Boulevard to about Alcazar Avenue. 15. Present-day Byrne Avenue runs along the east parcel boundary. 16. In the general location of the "Capt Steven's House" as shown on the 1857 Tracy rancho plats. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 14 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-14 Boulevard, the developed areas of the McClellan Ranch at the south end and areas covered with introduced landscaping (e.g., lawn areas). The pedestrian survey relied on random transects spaced at intervals of 3-5 meters within an alignment along both banks Stevens Creek. Surface visibility along the Stevens Creek alignment varied from zero to 100 percent due to the concrete lined creek in the area parallel to the Blackberry Farm Golf course holes 8-9; the presence of steep slopes, dense vegetation, areas of poison oak or berry bushes (thorns) including McClellan Ranch north to the property line for Blackberry Farms (Pine Grove Picnic Site) and the Hillside Picnic Area north to the orange grove located on the west side of the creek. Very little vegetation was present within the Blackberry farms picnic sites. Mr. Canzonieri also attempted to relocate previously recorded prehistoric site CA-SCl-715. The recorded location and immediate vicinity were carefully walked using 3-5 meter transects from north to south. Surface visibility was approximately 90 percent. No midden (culturally affected soil) or other definitive indicators (e.g., artifacts, bone, etc.) of prehistoric activity were observed. Numerous fragments of granite, chert, sandstone, and serpentine were noted throughout the orchard, but none appeared to be culturally modified. Several small fresh water 17 clamshells and one small metacarpal fragment from a deer (Odocoileus sp.)were also observed. 18 Mrs. Barbara Banfield, Staff Naturalist of the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society (SCVAS)at - objects within a wall at Blackberry Farm (21975 San Fernando Avenue). She also noted that the original creek alignment may have meandered through the Blackberry Farm 19 parking loton San Fernando Avenue. Mr. Canzonieri observed and photographed two indurated sandstone bowl mortars and two cupules embedded in two walls at Blackberry Farm: a mortar and cupule within the low wall/border in front of the Retreat Center building and another mortar and cupule within the low wall around the building. According to Mrs. Banfield, the walls were constructed in the 1950's with stone gathered from nearby Stevens Creek. No other prehistoric or significant historic era archaeological materials were observed during the field inventory completed by Mr. Canzonieri. PRESENCE/ABSENCE TESTING CA-SCl-715 Mechanically assisted presence/absence testing was undertaken within the mapped site boundary of CA-SCl-715 [see Figs. 4-6]. The testing program was undertaken to determine if significant subsurface archaeological resources were present or absent within or adjacent to the recorded site boundaries. The Basin Research field team consisted of Christopher Canzonieri, M.A. (Archaeologist & Physical Anthropologist) and Stuart Guedon, M.A. (Historical 17. A number of the rocks as well as the deer bone exhibited postmortem damage, likely the result of disking. 18. McClellan Ranch, Santa Clara Audubon Society, 22221 McClellan Road, Cupertino, CA 95014; (408) 252- 3747; scvas@scvas.org 19. presumably the "Horseshoe Bend" lot west of the Office and Retreat Center on San Fernando Avenue BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 15 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-15 Geographer & Archaeologist). Prior to testing, Mr. Canzonieri and Mr. Guedon field located 12 Backhoe Test Units (BTUs) in consultation with and the approval of Dr. Colin Principal Archaeologist. The units were generally located between the future trail and proposed stream channel. Units were sited to minimize damage. Excavation used a rubber-tired backhoe fitted with a 24-inch wide-toothed bucket. The mean length of the BTUs was 2.87 meters (9.42 feet); the mean width was 0.74 meters (2.42 feet); and mean depth was 2.37 meters (7.78 feet) below current ground surface. BTU depths ranged from 1.83-3.60 meters (6.0-11.80 feet) below present ground surface. The spoil and trench profiles were visually inspected by the archaeological team to check for the presence/absence of cultural resources. Ten shovel samples recovered from each observed th stratum in each BTU were screened through 1/4inch mesh to determine the presence/absence of cultural constituents. Standard archaeological recordation, including a written description, sediment profile, and photographs, were completed for each unit; soil/charcoal samples were also collected from selected units. All BTUs were backfilled and wheel-rolled. FINDINGS The intent of this assessment is to identify historic properties which may be listed, determined or potentially eligible for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)20 within the project that may be affected by the proposed construction. RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS 21 One prehistoric site, CA-SCl-715 (P-43-000633)has been recorded adjacent to the west bank of Stevens Creek within an area proposed for improvement. This site has been described as a 1000 x 300 meter "low-visibility earth midden with few surface materials" - one Franciscan chert flake, a sandstone hammerstone, a few shell fragments, fire-cracked rock and a piece of burned bone (Bocek 1991/form). 20. A historical resource may be listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) if it meets one or more of the following criteria: "(1) it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; (2) it is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history; (3) it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or (4) it has yielded or has the potential to yield information important in the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation." Automatic listings include properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places, determined eligible for the National Register either by the Keeper of the National Register or through a consensus determination on a project review, or State Historical Landmarks from number 770 onward. In addition Points of Interest nominated from January 1998 onward will be jointly listed as Points and in the California Register. Landmarks prior to 770 and Points of Historical Interest may be listed through an action of the State Historical Resources Commission (CAL/OHP ca. 1999, 2001a-c). 21. Trinomial (Primary Number) assigned by the CHRIS/NWIC. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 16 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-16 Cartier et al. (1994a) placed six auger bores ranging between 20 cm to 130 cm deep at CA-SCl- 715. "No intact subsurface deposits" were encountered - a single fragment of charcoal was found in two auger units (Units 2 and 6) and "traces of historic subsurface cultural material including one small window glass shard" were found in another (Unit 6). No additional information is available. The site has not been evaluation for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources. No historic era sites have been recorded or reported in or adjacent to the project. One Historic " Era site, "Blackberry Farm Sitehas been informally noted on the CHRIS/NWIC USGS Cupertino, Calif. topographic map. Four cultural resources compliance reports on file with the CHRIS/NWIC (File No. 04-996) include the project and/or area adjacent to the project. Cupertino: Potential Cultural Resources, 22 23 Ordinance, and Sensitivity Map(Cartier et al. 1980/S-8403)includes the entire city. An Archaeological Inspection of the Kaiser Cement Property, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California (Holman 1988/S-10471) appears to include portions of the project and was negative for cultural resources in the project. The Cultural Resources Evaluation for the Summer Dams 24 Project (Cartier et al. 1994a/S-16730)includes part of the current project area within "Stevens Creek Location The archaeological survey of this area was negative. The McClellan Ranch Park Needs Assessment Project: McClellan Ranch Park Site Specific Survey (Laffey 1996/S- 18893) includes historic background for Elisha Stephens, William T. McClellan, Joseph th McClellan, 20Century Ownership; building chronologies for the McClellan Ranch House, McClellan Milk House, Parrish Tank House and McClellan Barn; and, various Historic Resources Inventory Forms. NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCES No known ethnographic or contemporary Native American resources, including villages, known trails, sacred places, traditional or contemporary use areas, have been identified in or adjacent to the project. HISTORIC PERIOD RESOURCES (not including Listed Historic Properties) Hispanic Era No Hispanic Era sites including the Anza Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail [1776] or rancho dwellings and/or features have been identified in or adjacent to the project as a result of research conducted for this report. 22. Map not attached to report. 23. S-# assigned by the CHRIS/NWIC. Addendum 24. Note the for the Summer Dams Project (Cartier et al. 1994b/S-16731) includes a map of Stevens Creek Location #1 in the project, but only information about the project locations deleted from the earlier report (Cartier et al. 1994a/S-16730). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 17 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-17 American Period No Historic Era archaeological resources have been formally recorded or reported in or adjacent Blackberry Farm Site" to the project. One historic era site, "has been informally recorded in the project by the CHRIS/NWIC. LISTED HISTORIC PROPERTIES No California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed historic properties have been identified in or immediately adjacent to the proposed project area. One California Point of interest is present and five properties within or adjacent to the project are listed either on various Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory(ies) and/or are identified as City of Cupertino Historic Sites. Blackberry FarmBlackberry One California Point of Interest, , is within the project area. FarmElisha Stephen's HomesteadLouis Stocklmeir Home"Doyle Winery Site , , , (foundation only)McClellan Ranch Park " and (including Baer's Blacksmith Shop replica and the Parrish tank house) have been listed on various Santa Clara County Inventories (1975 and 1979) and/or identified as potential City of Historic Sites in 1980 (Cartier et al. 1980/S-8403) and in the 2005 City of Cupertino Draft General Plan (see Fig. 2G in Draft General Plan). 25 Blackberry Farm ,Stevens Creek Road (located between Stevens Creek Road and McClelland Boulevard with access to the former resort via San Fernando Avenue) has been a California Point of Interest since 1975 (CAL/OHP 1992:66, #SCL-037) and is on the California Inventory of Historic Resources under the Theme Exploration/Settlement. The latter states: The area is the site of the former homestead and farm of Captain Elisha Stephens, a noted wagon train guide who settled in this area in 1848 (CAL/OHP 1976:126, 265). The Historic Properties Directory lists Blackberry Farm as code 7L, that is "State Historical Landmarks 1-769 and Points of Historical Interest designated prior to January 1998 - Needs to be reevaluated using current standards" (CAL/OHP 2003, 2005a). 26 Site of Elisha Stephen's Homestead , 21975 San Fernando Street, Monta Vista [sic; east Blackberry Farm, side of Stevens Creek] and 22100 Stevens Creek Boulevard, are listed 25. In 1953, Blackberry Farm was purchased by N.S. Nelson and Albert Nelson, two brothers from Sweden who expanded the resort including replacing the orchard between Stevens Creek and the resort proper with a 9-hole golf course. The family sold the facility to the City of Cupertino in 1991. The resort, located south of the golf course on the east bank of the creek, includes picnic sites with barbecues, two swimming pools, softball, basketball, volleyball, horseshoe pit, playground, snack bar/concession house, office, and retreat center (Blackberry Farm 2005). This was the homestead of Captain Elisha Stephens, who guided the Martin Murphy-Townsend party from 26. Council Bluffs to Sutter's Fort in 1844. It was the first covered wagon train to cross the Sierras. Near the present Steven's Creek he homesteaded 160 acres in 1848. He called his homestead Blackberry farm. He left the area in 1864 and moved to the area that is now Bakersfield. A resort hotel was built on the property and it stood until the 1906 earthquakeBlackberry Farm This picnic ." (Pace 1975:19, #2). The latter entry for states: ground and golf course (Blackberry Recreation Center, Inc.) was developed in 1953 on the site of Captain Elisha Stephens (Stevens) (Pace 1975:19, #11). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 18 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-18 in the 1975 Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory (Pace 1975:19, #2 and #11). The Site of Elisha P. Stephens home, 1850, now part of Blackberry Farm has been identified as City of Cupertino Historic Site #10 in the 2005 City of Cupertino Draft General Plan (Cupertino 2005:Fig. 2G). The Elisha Stephens Homesite - Blackberry Farm Golf Course on Stevens Creek Blvd. was identified as a potential City of Cupertino cultural resource (Cartier et al. 1980:40, #30/S-8403). Louis Stocklmeir Home at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard is at the northern boundary of the project. The farm complex was settled in 1900. The house, dating to 1903, has been extensively remodeled and has been identified as City of Cupertino Historic Site #9 in the 2005 City of Cupertino Draft General Plan (Cupertino 2005:Fig. 2G). The Stocklmeir Ranch Complex - 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd was identified as potential City of Cupertino cultural resource in 1980 (Cartier et al. 1980:40, #31/S-8403). "Doyle Winery Site (foundation only) " has been identified as City of Cupertino Historic Site #8 in the 2005 in the City of Cupertino Draft General Plan (Cupertino 2005:Fig. 2G) 27 (bounded by McClellan Avenue on south and is on east side of Stevens Creek).The Doyle Ranch and Winery - McClellan Avenue was identified as potential City of Cupertino cultural resource in 1980 (Cartier et al. 1980:40, #35/S-8403). McClellan Ranch Park at 22221 McClellan Road (south terminus of project area on east side) is listed on the 1979 Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory (including Charles M. Baer's replica of his father's 1888 Blacksmith Shop Enoch Parrish and the tank house (SCCloHHC 1979:19, #6)) and is notable for A portion of one of the oldest ranches along Stevens Creek, W.T. McClellan's ranch is now a city park (SCCloHHC 1979:19, #6). This property was originally purchased by W.T. McClellan and George McCauley from Captain Elisha Stephens. The McClellan and McCauley families operated a successful dairy farm on the property which by the 1960s had been converted to a horse ranch. The 23.5-acre park was purchased in the mid-1970s by the City of Cupertino 28 (SCVAS 1998:2). 27. "John T. Doyle, a well-known attorney in the 1860s purchased [Samuel] Williams' half [of "what is said to have been the first large planting of grapevines in the county"], lying along Stevens Creek, and built a winery on one side of the stream [west side] and a dwelling house on the other, later called the Monte Vista Winery. ... The Doyle family, whose main residence was near Menlo Park, built the house on their Stevens Creek property in 1873. In 1882, it became the location of the first Cupertino post office. The Doyle house and cement winery, or storage house stand at 22044 McClellan Road, at the first bend of the road. Doyle is referred to as the "most important single individual in the history of the West Side wine industry", notable for the his modern facilities and success (see Hoover et al. 1966:459 and Sullivan 1982:50-51, 53 for additional information). 28. The present McClellan Ranch House is estimated to date to the 1930s with remodeling in the 1950s or 1960s; a west wing to ca. 1974; handicap access and bathroom remodeling/ramping in 1984. The McClellan Milk House th appears to have been constructed in the "early decades of the 20Century"; a restroom was added in 1974. The Enoch Parrish Tank House was acquired along with the Enoch J. Parrish House [ca. 1895], across form DeAnza College on Stevens Creek Boulevard by the City of Cupertino in 1966 for Memorial Park. The house burned in June 1975 (Pace 1975:19, #5; Laffey 1996:13). The tank house was "reassembled" adjacent/contiguous to the Milk House at McClellan Ranch Park ca. 1977. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 19 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-19 The City of Cupertino Draft General Plan includes City of Cupertino Historic Site #7 (Replica Baer Blacksmith Shop) and #6 (Enoch J. Parrish Tank House), but does not designate the ranch proper as a Historic Site (Cupertino 2005:Fig. 2G). Rather, the McClellan Ranch Park is a designated nature and rural preserve as designed by Ordinance 710 adopted by the Cupertino City Council on January 6, 1976 (Laffey 1996:11/S-18893). The McClellan Ranch Park (including Charles M. Baer's replica of his father's 1888 Blacksmith Shop, the tankhouse from the Enoch Parrish property and several other McClellan ranch structures) was identified as a potential City of Cupertino cultural resource in 1980 (Cartier et al. 1980:34, #12, 35). The map in the current Trail Guide for the McClellan Ranch Park shows seven structures 29 30 within the property: the blacksmith shopand Parrish tankhouse,the McClellan Ranch 31 House,a Milk Barn (restrooms) located adjacent to the tankhouse, a Junior Nature 32 Museum building, a Garden Storage building, a Historic Barn,and "4-H" building with 33 fencing. In addition, remnants of the former orchard are also noted(SCVAS 1998:2, 6 [map], 9-10). Simms House, address not provided, is located at the south end of the project on the west side of Stevens Creek opposite the McClellan Ranch. This house is currently under review by the Cupertino Historical Society. ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD INVENTORY RESULTS The archaeological field inventory for the project did not relocate prehistoric site CA-SCl-715. A small quantity of prehistoric ground stone artifacts was observed being used a wall decoration at several stone borders/walls at Blackberry Farm (22100 Stevens Creek Boulevard). No other The McClellan Barn was built between 1901-1909 (Walter Wilson owner) or 1910-1930 (Fred Connor owner) and improved including adding horse stalls after 1955 (Hirosuke Inouye owner). The City painted and added a new roof after 1975. In addition, the rolling doors rebuilt. Charley Baer House, Stevens Creek and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road, Cupertino -- 29. Pace (1975:19, #3) includes the The house was built by W.T. Baer in 1903. Baer opened Cupertino's first blacksmith shop in 1887. .." 30. The E.J. Parrish house, now site, was located on the northeast corner of Mary Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard across from De Anza College. The house was damaged by fire and demolished in 1975. It was listed as California Point of Historical Interest in 1972 (CAL/OHP 1992:65, SCL-016 [B.J. Parrish House]), on the California Inventory of Historic Resources under the theme of architecture (CAL/OHP 1976:37, 266 E.J. Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory Parrish), and on 1979 (SClCoHHC 1979:20, #14). The oldest house in the vicinity of Stevens Creek remodeled beyond recognition at 22221 31. Described as ... McClellan Road. It was built by W.T. McClellan, who owned a few hundred acres adjoining Blackberry Farm ( Hoover et al. 1966:459). 32. As dating to 1890; Laffey (1996/S-18893) as built between built between 1901-1909 or 1910-1930. 33. "Captain Stephens enjoyed orchards and planted much of the land with fruit tr BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 20 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-20 evidence of prehistoric or historically significant prehistoric or historic era archaeological resources was observed during the field inventory conducted for this report. ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESENCE/ABSENCE TESTING (see Table 1) No significant prehistoric or historical cultural material was noted either on the surface or observed in the 12 BTUs suggesting that CA-SCl-715 is not present where improvements are proposed to occur. BTU 4 contained a very thin charcoal lens and shell fragment (oyster) at 0.38 meters below the surface [see Fig. 7]; BTU 8 and BTU 9 [see Fig. 8] had small charcoal flecks present at 0.25 meters and 0.10 meters respectively. In addition, a clamshell was collected from the surface near a ground squirrel burrow. All of these materials are within the plow zone and highly disturbed. The surface shell was identified as California Lucine (Epilucina californica), a salt-water species that is present in moderately shallow waters. The second shell (fragment) recovered from BTU 4 appears to be oyster (Ostrea lurida). A sufficient sample of charcoal for radiocarbon dating could not be obtained. TABLE 1 Unit Observations and Comments UNIT #DESCRIPTION/OBSERVATIONSCOMMENTS All units were excavated on February 13, 2006; the units Stratum depths presented in ranged in length from 2.50 m to 3.10 m; 0.70 m to 0.80 m centimeters. Elevation is presented wide, and ranged in depth from 1.83 m to 3.60 m; specific in feet. Roots and Rootlets were dimensions given under mm section; BTUs 1, 2, 3, observed in all strata/depths 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 were oriented east west; BTUs 5 and 7 were oriented north south. Ten shovel samples th recovered from each stratum were screened through 1/4 inch mesh. Unit 1 0-35 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.00 m L x 0.80 m W x 2.00 m D clayey silt, with angular to subrounded coarse sand (1/2-1.0 Elevation ± 292.7 feet mm) 10YR 3/2. No cultural material. Rodent burrow 35-150cm ± Stratum B: moist firm very dark brown at base of unit (SE corner) medium grained (1/4-1/2 mm) silty clay 10YR 2/2. 150-200 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm brown silt with Sandstone cobbles at bottom of units sandstone angular to rounded cobbles at base of unit, 10YR likely the old creek bed. 5/4. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 21 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-21 Unit Observations and Comments UNIT #DESCRIPTION/OBSERVATIONSCOMMENTS Unit 2 0-20 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.00 m L x 0.75 m W x 2.50 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 293.7 feet 3/2. Small angular pebbles were observed 20-40 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm brown clayey silt with in all levels. coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand 10YR 4/3 No cultural material. 40-220 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm very dark grayish brown clayey silt 10YR 3/2. 220-250 cm ± Stratum D: moist firm very dark grayish brown clayey sand with pebbles and subrounded to rounded cobbles 10YR 3/2. Unit 3 0-30 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.00 m L x 0.74 m W x 2.05 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 293.7 feet 3/2. No cultural material. 30-55 cm ± Stratum B: gravely sandy lens with coarse- grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand. 55-200 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm tan-brown sand with medium coarse (1/4-1/2 mm) sand and subrounded pebbles. 200-205 cm ± Stratum D: moist firm very dark grayish brown clayey silt with angular to subrounded cobbles and pebbles 10YR 3/2. Unit 4 0-175 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish 3.00 m L x 0.70 m W x 1.83 m D brown silt (very little clay) with coarse (1/2-1.0 mm) sand Elevation ± 293.7 feet 10YR 3/2. Thin lens of orange brown soil with 35-40 cm ± thin lens within Stratum A: firm orange brown charcoal and ash. A shell fragment silty clay with charcoal and some ash. was recovered within the lens. The 175-183 cm ± Stratum B firm very dark grayish brown fine Ostrea shell appears to be oyster silt (mm), 10YR 3/2. lurida . 183 cm ± Stratum C: firm very dark grayish brown silty clay with angular to subrounded cobbles 10YR 3/2. Unit 5 0-20 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.00 m L x 0.76 m W x 2.10 m D clayey silt 10YR 3/2, with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) Elevation ± 295.1 feet sand. No cultural material. 20-35 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm brown silty clay 10YR 4/4, with some rootlets. 35-210 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm very dark grayish brown silty clay with subrounded pebbles and cobbles 10YR 3/2. Unit 6 0-20 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 2.55 m L x 0.77 m W x 1.90 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 295.1 feet 3/2. No cultural material. 20-30 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm dark yellowish brown clay sand with pebbles 10YR 3/4. 30-50 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm very dark grayish brown silty clay 10YR 3/2 with angular and subrounded pebbles. 50-110 cm ± Stratum D: moist firm very dark grayish brown silt with subrounded pebbles 10YR 3/2. 110-190 cm ± Stratum E: moist firm brown silty sand with subrounded pebbles 10YR 4/3. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 22 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-22 Unit Observations and Comments UNIT #DESCRIPTION/OBSERVATIONSCOMMENTS Unit 7 0-13 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.00 m L x 0.70 m W x 2.05 m D clayey sand with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 295.6 feet 3/2. No cultural material. 13-2030 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm dark yellowish brown clay with pebbles 10YR 3/4. 20-200 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm very dark grayish brown silty clay 10YR 3/2 with angular and subrounded pebbles. 200-205 cm ± Stratum D: moist firm brown silty sand with subrounded pebbles 10YR 4/3. Unit 8 0-20 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.00 m L x 0.80 m W x 2.54 m D clayey sand with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 295.4 feet 3/2. 20-180 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm dark grayish brown silty Charcoal fleck in north wall; clay with pebbles 10YR 3/2. approximately 25 cm below surface 180-254 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm brown silty sand 10YR 4/3 with subrounded pebbles. Unit 9 0-10 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 3.10 m L x 0.70 m W x 3.40 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 295.4 feet 3/2. 10-170 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm dark grayish brown silty Charcoal fleck; approximately 10 clay with pebbles 10YR 3/2. cm below surface 170-280 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm brown silty with sandstone cobbles (observed in the back dirt) 10YR 4/3. 280-340 cm ± Stratum D: moist firm brown gravely sand with small and medium sized boulders (granite, sandstone, shale, and other unidentified rocks observed in the back dirt) 10YR 4/3. Unit 10 0-10 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 2.80 m L x 0.70 m W x 3.60 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR Elevation ± 295.4 feet 3/2. No cultural material. 10-340 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm very dark grayish brown silty clay 10YR 3/2. 340-360 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm very dark grayish brown silt with sandstone cobbles 10YR 3/2. Unit 11 0-10 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 2.50 m L x 0.70 m W x 2.20 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR 3/2. Elevation ± 295.2 feet 10-205 cm ± Stratum B: moist firm very dark grayish brown No cultural material. silty clay 10YR 3/2. 205-220 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm brown gravelly sand with cobbles and pebbles 10YR 4/3. Unit 12 0-20 cm ± Stratum A: moist loose very dark grayish brown 2.50 m L x 0.70 m W x 2.30 m D clayey silt with coarse-grained (1/2-1.0 mm) sand, 10YR 3/2. Elevation ± 296.5 feet 20-200cm ± Stratum B: moist firm very dark grayish brown No cultural material. silty clay 10YR 3/2. 200-230 cm ± Stratum C: moist firm brown silty clay with sandstone cobbles 10YR 4/3. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 23 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-23 UNKNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT AREAS The research suggests a low potential for archaeological resources at each of the project locations based on past earth disturbance at each location and the low to moderate regional archaeological sensitivity suggested by the few locations of recorded prehistoric and historic archaeological sites within a quarter mile of each project area. There appears to be a locally moderate to high potential for inadvertent discoveries of buried archaeological deposits during subsurface construction at each project location. However, any archaeological deposits exposed during subsurface construction could contain potentially significant buried prehistoric and/or historic cultural materials, including Native American human remains. Disturbance could result in the loss of integrity of the cultural deposit and subsequent loss of scientific information, which would be a potentially significant impact. IMPACTS SIGNIFICANCE Criteria The CEQA Guidelines indicate that a project will have a significant impact on cultural resources if it: causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA guidelines; causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA guidelines; and/or disturbs any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Construction impacts to one recorded prehistoric site are possible and there is a potential for impacts to as-yet-unknown cultural resources during construction. Significant and potentially significant impacts to cultural resources will be reduced to a less-than-significant level with the adoption of the mitigation measures. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS Ground-disturbing construction activities associated with the picnic area, stream channel, trail and bridge construction and restoration activities have the potential to directly affect potential archaeological resources in the project area by disturbing both surface and subsurface soils. Stream Channel Demolition and removal of three low-flow automobile crossings, a diversion dam and three wooden pedestrian bridges. Expansion of 600 feet of pool and riffle habitat to recreate a stable channel bottom. Realignment of 1,300 feet of the stream channel to its historic channel to lengthen and stabile the channel. Development of pool and riffle habitat in this section. Conversion of a portion of the former creek channel to include filling 650 feet and creating 200 feet backwater wetland habitat where the new channel meets the original streambed. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 24 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-24 Construction of new 600-foot stream channel through Stocklmeir orange orchard to reduce erosion and undercutting of the bank along the golf course. Development of four step pools and seven pool and riffle sequences, planting the west bank this new channel. Conversion of 600 feet of the former creek channel through removal of riprap and shotcrete and creation of willow swale in old channel. Riparian habitat planting along the new channel and segments of the existing 1.15 miles of the creek. Potential Impacts : Subsurface excavation impacts to an area north, south and west of recorded location for CA-SCl-715 could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources. Project components that involve subsurface excavation could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources. Picnic Area and Pool Complex Improvements Consolidation of the picnic facilities to one location on the west bank of the creek and improvements including new utilities, restrooms, barbecues, tables, horseshoe pits and volleyball courts as well as a 14-foot wide light duty bridge over the creek. Potential Impacts : Subsurface excavation impacts to an area to the south of the recorded location for CA-SCl-715 could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources. Trail Construction of an 8-foot wide pedestrian and bicycle trail extending 5,900 feet from Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Road. th Construction of an 8-foot wide pedestrian/bicycle bridge spanning the creek near the 8 hole on the golf course. Creation of a 17-car trailhead staging area with a remodeled restroom in the location of the existing parking lot upstream of the pool that currently accommodates 200 plus vehicles. Demolition of approximately 32,000 square feet of excess parking paving. Potential Impacts : Subsurface excavation impacts to an area north and south of recorded location for CA-SCl-715 could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources. Environmental Education Center Construction of a 2,000 square foot environmental education center with 2 classrooms, an office and restrooms to be built on an existing building pad formerly occupied by a doublewide trailer in McClellan Ranch. Potential Impacts : Subsurface excavation impacts could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources associated with the historic McClellan Ranch. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 25 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-25 Upland Habitat Restoration Restoration of the upland oak woodland habitat in closed picnic areas and in and around updated picnic areas and the trail. Potential Impacts : Subsurface excavation impacts to an area north and south of recorded location for CA-SCl-715 could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources. Other project components that involve subsurface excavation could expose as yet unknown archaeological resources Impacts could result from grading and trenching for both surface preparation and underground utility connections and any other activities associated with constructing the proposed improvements that involve ground disturbance. These impacts will be reduced to less than significant with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. Subsurface and surface disturbance could result in the loss of integrity of cultural deposits, loss of information, and the alteration of a site setting. There is also the potential for inadvertent discoveries of buried archaeological materials during construction. Prehistoric archaeological sites in this area of Santa Clara County are often associated with water sources. The presence of one prehistoric site within the project area and the ground stone artifacts incorporated into wall construction at the Blackberry Farm suggests a moderate to high potential for subsurface resources. These impacts will be reduced to less than significant with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation measures are provided to guide subsurface construction and in the event that significant or potentially significant unknown cultural resources are discovered during construction. Significant and potentially significant impacts to cultural resources will be reduced to a less-than-significant level with the adoption of the following mitigation measures. Prior to the initiation of construction or ground-disturbing activities, the City of Cupertino Project Manager shall inform all construction personnel of the potential for exposing subsurface cultural resources and to recognize possible buried cultural resources. Personnel shall be informed of the procedures that will be followed upon the discovery or suspected discovery of archaeological materials, including Native American remains and their treatment. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 26 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-26 TABLE 2 Significance Criteria and Summary of Potential Impacts for Cultural Resources Significance CriteriaPotentially Less-Than- Less-Than- No ImpactImpact Identified Significant Significant Significant for: Impactwith Impact Mitigation Incorporation Threshold of Significance: Construction The Project would result in damage to, the disruption of, or adversely affect a property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or a local register of historic resources as per Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code. Threshold of Significance: Construction The Project would cause damage to, disrupt, or adversely affect an important prehistoric or historic archaeological resource such that its integrity could be compromised or eligibility for future listing on the CRHR diminished. Threshold of Significance: Construction The Project would cause damage to or diminish the significance of an important historic resource such that its integrity could be compromised or eligibility for future listing on the CRHR diminished. All excavation contracts for the project shall contain provisions for stop-work in the vicinity of a find in the event of the exposure of significant archaeological resources during subsurface construction. In addition, the contract documents shall recognize the need to implement any mitigation conditions required by the permitting agency. In general, the appropriate construction conditions should be included within the General Conditions section of any contract that has the potential for ground disturbing operations. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 27 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-27 Archaeological monitoring on a full-time basis by a Professional Archaeologist retained by the project proponent shall be undertaken during subsurface construction within and within a 100 feet buffer zone of the recorded boundary of CA-SCl-715 that was not subject to presence/absence testing. Actions that could potentially require monitoring include habitat restoration, trail construction and pedestrian/bicycle bridge construction. Archaeological monitoring on an intermittent basis to allow for spot-checking of subsurface construction shall be undertaken for areas outside of the recorded boundary of CA-SCl-715 and the 100-foot buffer zone. Monitoring in these areas shall be at the discretion of the Professional Archaeologist retained to provide archaeological monitoring services. Construction methods and procedures to minimize subsurface disturbance shall be implemented where feasible and practical. These may include: (1) planting by seed, and hand excavation for planting in the habitat restoration areas within and within 100 foot of the recorded boundary of CA-SCl-715 not subject to presence/absence testing; (2) raising the grade of the proposed trail (capping) by engineered fill within 100 feet of the recorded boundary of CA-SCl-715 not subject to presence/absence testing. Fill shall be no less than 12-inches deep. Fill placement shall be done without surface grubbing (i.e., removal of any organics). Rubber tired equipment shall be used to minimize surface disturbance. Upon discovery of possible buried prehistoric and historic cultural materials (including 34 potential Native American skeletal remains),construction within 25 feet of the find shall be halted to avoid altering the cultural m Project Manager shall be notified. 34. Significant prehistoric cultural resources may include: a. Human bone - either isolated or intact burials. b. Habitation (occupation or ceremonial structures as interpreted from rock rings/features, distinct ground depressions, differences in compaction (e.g., house floors). c. Artifacts including chipped stone objects such as projectile points and bifaces; groundstone artifacts such as manos, metates, mortars, pestles, grinding stones, pitted hammerstones; and, shell and bone artifacts including ornaments and beads. d. Various features and samples including hearths (fire-cracked rock; baked and vitrified clay), artifact caches, faunal and shellfish remains (which permit dietary reconstruction), distinctive changes in soil stratigraphy indicative of prehistoric activities. e. Isolated artifacts Historic cultural materials may include finds from the late 19th through early 20th centuries. Objects and features associated with the Historic Period can include. a. Structural remains or portions of foundations (bricks, cobbles/boulders, stacked fieldstone, postholes, etc.). b. Trash pits, privies, wells and associated artifacts. c. Isolated artifacts or isolated clusters of manufactured artifacts (e.g., glass bottles, metal cans, manufactured wood items, etc.). d. Human remains. In addition, cultural materials including both artifacts and structures that can be attributed to Hispanic, Asian and other ethnic or racial groups are potentially significant. Such features or clusters of artifacts and samples include remains of structures, trash pits, and privies. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 28 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-28 The Project Manager shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist to review and evaluate the find. Construction work shall not begin again until the archaeological or cultural resources consultant has been allowed to examine the cultural materials, assess their significance, and offer proposals for any additional exploratory measures deemed necessary for the further evaluation of, and/or mitigation of adverse impacts to, any potential historical resources or unique archaeological resources that have been exposed If the discovery is determined to be a unique archaeological or historical resource, and if avoidance of the resource is not possible, the archaeologist shall inform the Project Manager of the necessary plans for treatment of the find(s) and mitigation of impacts. The treatment plan shall be designed to result in the extraction of sufficient non-redundant archaeological data to address important regional research considerations. The Project Manager shall make every effort to insure that the treatment program is completed. The work shall be performed by the archaeologist, and shall result in a detailed technical report that shall be filed with the California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center. Construction in the immediate vicinity of the find shall not recommence until treatment has been completed. If human remains are discovered, they shall be handled in accordance with State law including immediate notification of the County Medical Examiner/Coroner. CLOSING REMARKS If I can provide any additional information or be of further service please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for retaining our firm for the project. Sincerely yours, BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC., Colin I. Busby, Ph.D., RPA Principal CIB/dg Enclosures BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 29 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-29 REFERENCES CITED AND CONSULTED Allen, Rebecca (editor) 1999 Upgrade of the Guadalupe Parkway, San Jose. Historic Properties Treatment Plan. For California Department of Transportation, District 4, Oakland. Copy on file, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. (ASCE) American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco 1977 Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks of San Francisco and Northern California. The History and Heritage Committee, San Francisco Section, American Society of Civil Engineers. Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Balance Hydrologics 2005 E-mail to Colin Busby, Basin Research Associates from Scott Brown, Geomorphologist/Hydrologist, Balance Hydrologics. Regarding: C14 date from Stevens Creek Trail, Cupertino. Dated May 9, 2005. Baltzer, Dave 1969 Map of Cupertino 1887 [showing landholdings within the community in 1887]. In Cupertino Chronicle. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 19, p. 56, edited by Seonaid L. McArthur and David W. Fuller . De Anza College, Cupertino, California (appears to be copy of Henry A. Barinard 1885 Cupertino Santa Clara Valley Map No. 6, part detail in Sullivan 1982). Bean, Lowell John (compiler and editor) 1994 The Ohlone Past and Present: Native Americans of the San Francisco Bay Region. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers 42, Menlo Park. Beck, W.A. and Y.D. Haase 1974 Historical Atlas of California (Third printing, 1977). University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory (Darden Hood) 2005 Letter to Mr. Scott Brown, Balance Hydrologics, Inc., Berkeley, CA. Regarding: Radiocarbon Dating Result for Sample 041124:3.5 [soils testing sample from orchard/vicinity of CA-SCl-715]. Dated April 21, 2005. Enclosing Data Sheet: Calibration of Radiocarbon Age to Calendar years. Laboratory Number: Beta-203301. Conventional radiocarbon age: 470+40 BP. 2 Sigma calibrated result (95% probability): Cal AD 1410 to 1470 (Cal BP 540 to 480). 1 Sigma calibrated result (68% probability): Cal AD 1420 to 1450 (Cal BP 530 to 500). Intercept of radiocarbon age with calibration curve: Cal AD 1430 (Cal BP 520). Blackberry Farm 2005 Brochure (including Blackberry Farm site map, frequently asked questions, and short history). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 30 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-30 Bocek, Barbara (Stanford University Archaeologist) 1991 Archaeological Site Record form, CA-SCl-715 (Primary Number P-43- 000633; Monta Vista Orange Orchard). On file, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. Bolton, Herbert E. (editor) 1930 Anza's California Expeditions. Vols. III-IV. Font's Complete Diary of the Second Anza Expedition. University of California Press, Berkeley. Barinard, Henry A. 1885 Cupertino Santa Clara Valley Map No. 6. Part detail Like Modern Edens: Winegrowing in Santa Clara Valley and Santa Cruz Mountains 1879-1981 by C.L.Sullivan. 1982. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 28. Broek, J.O.M. 1932 The Santa Clara Valley, California: A Study in Landscape Changes. N.V.A. Oosthoek's Utig. Maatij. Utrecht. Busby, Colin I. (Basin Research Associates) 2002 Letter Report to Ms. Christine Schneider, ASLA, Thomas Reid Associates, Palo Alto, CA. Regarding: Cultural Resources Records Search and Focused Literature Review [In] Support of an Initial Study Checklist and Responses, Stevens Creek Trail Study Area A, City of Cupertino, Santa Clara County. Dated June 26, 2002. MS on file, S-27998, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. 2005 Letter to Mr. Larry Meyers, Executive Secretary, Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), Sacramento, CA 95814. Regarding: Request for Review of Sacred Lands Inventory Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan, Cupertino, Santa Clara County. Dated April 28, 2005. Busby, Colin I. and Donna M. Garaventa 1984 A Cultural Resources Assessment of Two Proposed Storm Drain Reaches located between Bollinger Road and Blue Hill Drive in the City of San Jose, California. MS on file, S-6615, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. (CA-AAA) California State Automobile Association 2003 Sunnyvale - Santa Clara - Western San Jose. City Series. Map #2119. California (State of), Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation (CAL/OHP) 1973 The California History Plan. Volume One - Comprehensive Preservation Program. Volume Two - Inventory of Historic Features. 1976 California Inventory of Historic Resources. 1988 Five Views: An Ethnic Sites Survey for California. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 31 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-31 1990 California Historical Landmarks. 1992 California Points of Historical Interest. May 1, 1992. ca. 1999 Various Regarding the California Register of Historical Resources: (a) The Listing Process, (b) Questions and Answers, (c) Q & A for Local Governments, (d) Instructions and (d) Supplement to Instructions for Nominating Historical Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento. [Copies received 1/1999.] 2001a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Historical Resources. Technical Assistance Series 1. 2001b Historical Resource Registration Programs in California. Technical Assistance Series 2. 2001c California State Law and Historic Preservation: Statutes, Regulations and Administrative Policies Regarding Historic Preservation and Protection of Cultural and Historical Resources. Technical Assistance Series 10. 2002 California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register. Technical Assistance Series 6. 2003 California Historical Resources Status Codes. [National Register and California Register]. 2005a [Historic Properties Directory] Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data file for Santa Clara County (includes National Register of Historic Places status codes, California Historical Landmarks and California Points of Historical Interest listings, etc.). 2005b Archeological Determinations of Eligibility for Santa Clara County. Cartier, Robert, Charlene Detlefs and Glory Anne Laffey 1980 Cupertino: Potential Cultural Resources, Ordinance, and Sensitivity Map. MS on file, S-8403, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma Rohnert Park. Cartier, Robert, Elena Reese and Julie C. Wizorek (Archaeological Resource Management) 1994a Cultural Resources Evaluation for the Summer Dams Project [Santa Clara County]. MS on file, S-16730, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. Cartier, Robert, Elena Reese and Julie C. Wizorek (Archaeological Resource Management) 1994b Cultural Resources Evaluation Addendum for the Summer Dams Project , [Santa Clara County]. MS on file, S-16731CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 32 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-32 (C/CDD/PD) Cupertino (City of), Community Development Department, Planning Division Draft 2005 City of Cupertino General Plan. May 1, 2005. with Task Force Draft Corrections and Technical Changes [Fig. 2-G Historic Resources map, add Nathan Hall Tank House, adjacent to Blackberry Farm (at 22021 Stevens Creek Boulevard across the boulevard from Blackberry Farm in Hoover et al. 1966:459)]. http://www.cupertino.org/city government/departments and offices/planning and building... [printed 5/3/2005 and 5/25/2005]. Elsasser, A.B. 1978 Development of Regional Prehistoric Cultures. In California, edited by R.F. Heizer, Volume 8. Handbook of North American Indians, W.G. Sturtevant, general editor, pp. 37-57. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1986 Review of the Prehistory of the Santa Clara Valley Region, California. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory 7, Part I. Coyote Press, Salinas. Galvan, P.M. 1967/1968 People of the West: The Ohlone Story. Indian Historian 1(2):9-13. Hagel, Lisa 2005 Records Search for T. REID - Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan, Cupertino [Santa Clara County]. CHRIS/NWIC File. No. 04-996. Dated May 23, 2005. Copy on file, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. Harrington, J.P. 1942 Culture Element Distributions: XIX Central California Coast. University of California Anthropological Records 7(1). Hart, J.D. 1987 A Companion to California (revised and expanded). Oxford University Press, New York. Healey, C.T. 1866 Official Map of the County of Santa Clara. Surveyed and Compiled by Charles T. Healey. Ex-County Surveyor. A. Gensoul, San Francisco, and printed by Britton and Co., San Francisco. Hendry, G.W. and J.N. Bowman 1940 The Spanish and Mexican Adobe and Other Buildings in the Nine San Francisco Bay Counties, 1776 to about 1850. MS on file, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. Holman, Miley Paul 1988 An Archaeological Inspection of the Kaiser Cement Property, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. MS on file, S-10471, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma Rohnert Park. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 33 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-33 Hoover, M.B., H.E. Rensch, E.G. Rensch and W.N. Abeloe 1966 Historic Spots in California (Third edition). Revised by William N. Abeloe. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto. Hylkema, Mark G. 1995 Archaeological Investigations at the Third Location of The Murguia Mission, 1781-1818 (CA-SCL-30/H). Caltrans District 4, Environmental Planning, south, Oakland. MS on file, S-17891, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. James, W.F. and G.H. McMurry 1933 History of San Jose, California, Narrative and Biographical. A.H. Cawston, San Jose. King, Chester D. 1974 Modern Santa Clara Ethno-Geography. In Archaeological Element Environmental Impact Report on the San Felipe Water Distribution System, edited by T.F. King and G. Berg, Appendix I. MS on file, E-108/S-4248, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. 1978a Protohistoric and Historic Archaeology. In California, edited by R. F. Heizer, Volume 8. Handbook of North American Indians, W.G. Sturtevant, general editor, pp. 58-68. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1978b Historical Indian Settlements in the Vicinity of the Holiday Inn Site. In Archaeological Investigations at CA-SCl-128, the Holiday Inn Site, edited by J.C. Winter. MS on file, E-756/S-5281, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. 1994 Central Ohlone Ethnohistory. In The Ohlone Past and Present: Native Americans of the San Francisco Bay Region, pp. 203-228, compiled and edited by Lowell John Bean. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers 42, Menlo Park. King, T.F. and P.P. Hickman 1973 Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project. Part I The Southern Santa Clara Valley, California: A General Plan for Archaeology. MS on file, S-5222, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. Kroeber, A.L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Laffey, Glory Anne (Archives and Architecture) 1996 McClellan Ranch Park Needs Assessment Project: McClellan Ranch Park Site Specific Survey. MS on file, S-18893, CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 34 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-34 Levy, Richard 1978 Costanoan. In California, edited by R.F. Heizer, Volume 8. Handbook of North American Indians, W.G. Sturtevant, general editor, pp. 485-497. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Loomis, Patricia 1982 Signposts. San Jose Historical Museum Association, San Jose. 1985 Signposts II. San Jose Historical Museum Association, San Jose. Lyman, C.S. 1847 Plan of the Town of St. Joseph. Map on file, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. Margolin, Malcom 1978 The Ohlone Way: Indian Life In the San Francisco - Monterey Bay Area. Heyday Books, Berkeley. McArthur, Seonaid L. and David W. Fuller (editors) 1975 Cupertino Chronicle. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 19. De Anza College, Cupertino, California. McCaleb, Charles S. 1969 The San Jose Railroads: Centennial 1868-1968. California History Center, Local History Studies 2(1):1-88, De Anza College, Cupertino. Milliken, R.T. 1995 A Time of Little Choice: The Disintegration of Tribal Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area 1769-1810. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 43. Moratto, M.J. 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, New York. Pace, P. (compiler and editor) 1975 Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory. Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission, San Jose. Patera, E.L. (editor) 1991 H.E. Salley History of California Post Offices 1849-1990 (Second edition). The Depot, n.p. (Salley, H.E. and E.L. Patera, researchers). (NAHC) Pilas-Treadway, Debbie (Native American Heritage Commission) 2005 Letter to Colin I. Busby, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. Regarding: [Request for Review of Sacred Lands Inventory] Proposed Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan, Cupertino, Santa Clara County. Dated May 12, 2005. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 35 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-35 Quackenbush, Margery (editor) ca. 1971-1972 County Chronicles. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 9. De Anza College, Cupertino, California. Rambo, Ralph 1984 Pen and Inklings. The San Jose Historical Museum Association. Printed by the Rosicrucian Press, San Jose. Rambo, Ralph and Louis Stocklmeir ca. 1971-1972 VII. Cupertino. West Side Story. pp. 60-73 In County Chronicles. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 9. De Anza College, Cupertino, California, edited by Margery Quackenbush. San Jose Mercury 1896 Santa Clara County and its Resources: A Souvenir of the San Jose Mercury. [Sunshine, Fruit, and Flowers]. San Jose Mercury Publishing and Printing Co., San Jose. (SClCoHHC) Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission 1979 Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory. Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission, San Jose. 1999 Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory. Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission, San Jose. (SCVAS) Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society (various authors) 1998 McClellan Ranch Park Trail Guide [including short history]. (fifth revised edition [previous editions by Cupertino Parks and Recreation Department] Sawyer, E.T. 1922 A History of Santa Clara County, California. Historic Record Company, Los Angeles. Sokale, Jana 2002 Draft Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Report. May 21, 2002. For the City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Department in conjunction with the Stevens Creek Trail Task Force. Spearman, Arthur Dunning, S.J. 1963 The Five Franciscan Churches of Mission Santa Clara, 1777-1825. The National Press, Palo Alto. Stocklmeir, Louis 1975 VII. Cupertino. Monta Vista: A Small Piece of Paradise. pp. 120-130. In County Chronicles. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 9. De Anza College, Cupertino, California, edited by Margery Quackenbush. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 36 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-36 Sullivan, Charles L. 1982 Like Modern Edens: Winegrowing in Santa Clara Valley and Santa Cruz Mountains 1879-1981. California History Center Local History Studies Vol. 28. De Anza College, Cupertino, California. (T. Reid) Thomas Reid Associates 2005 Background Information for Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan, City of Cupertino,, Santa Clara County, California. On file, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. Thompson and West 1876 Historical Atlas of Santa Clara County, California. Thompson and West, San Francisco (reprinted Smith and McKay, San Jose, 1973). Tracy, C.C. 1857a Plat of the final survey of San Antonio Rancho finally confirmed to the Heirs of Prado Mesa showing the part not confirmed to Wm A. Dana et al. Surveyed under instructions from the U.S. Surveyor General by C.C. Tracy, Dep[upty] Sur[veyo]r. June 1857. Map on file, #176, Bureau of Land Management, Sacramento. 1857b Plat of the final survey of San Antonio Rancho showing [sic] the part finally confirmed to Wm A. Dana et al. Surveyed under instructions from the U.S. Surveyor General by C.C. Tracy, Dep[upty] Sur[veyo]r. June 1857. Map on file, #176A, Bureau of Land Management, Sacramento. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service with the California Agricultural Experiment Station (USDA/SCS) 1958 Santa Clara Area, California Soil Survey. Series 1941, No. 17. (USDI) United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs 2000 Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. Federal Register: March 13, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 49) Notices [Page 13298-13303]. http://www.artnatam.com/tribes.html (US/BLM) United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management [GLO or General Land Office] 1866 Survey Plat. Township No. 7 South, Range No. 2 West, Mount Diablo Baseline & Meridian. Detail provided by CHRIS/NWIC, File No. 04-996. (USGS) United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey 1899 Palo Alto [Calif]. Quadrangle. Topographic map, 15-minute series (surveyed 1895). 1973 Cupertino, Calif. (Quadrangle). Topographic map, 7.5 (1961, photorevised 1968 and 1973). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 37 Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-37 1980 Cupertino, Calif. [Quadrangle]. Topographic map, 7.5-minute series (1961 photorevised). 1991 Cupertino, CA. [Quadrangle]. Topographic map, 7.5-minute series. United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park. United States Department of the Interior, National Register of Historic Places, National Park (USNPS) Service 1995 Map Supplement for the Comprehensive Management and Use Plan Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Arizona-California. Pacific Great Basin Support Office, National Park Service. [San Francisco]. 1996 Comprehensive Management and Use Plan. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Arizona-California. Pacific Great Basin Support Office, National Park Service [San Francisco]. 2005 Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Arizona-California, Santa Clara County, California. Historic and Interpretative Sites http://www.nps.gov/jub/santacla.htm [printed 5/25/2005]. (US War Dept) United States War Department, Corps of Engineers 1943 Palo Alto, Calif. [Quadrangle]. Topographic map, 15-minute series. United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park (photography 1937, 1940). Walker, Mike 1994 Steam Powered Video's Comprehensive Railroad Atlas of North America. California and Nevada. Steam Powered Publishing, Faversham, Kent [England]. Abbreviations n.d. no date v.d. various dates N.P. no publisher noted n.p. no place of publisher noted The abbreviated phrase "CHRIS/NWIC, CSU Sonoma, Rohnert Park" is used for material on file at the California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center, California State University Sonoma, Rohnert Park. Note the primary numbers are not included in the citations above. BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-38 ATTACHMENTS FIGURE 1 GENERAL PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 2 PROJECT LOCATION (USGS Cupertino, Calif., 1991) FIGURE 3A PROJECT ALIGNMENT (STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK) FIGURE 3B PROJECT ALIGNMENT (North) FIGURE 3C PROJECT ALIGNMENT (Central) FIGURE 3D PROJECT ALIGNMENT (South) FIGURE 4 CA-SCl-715 SITE BOUNDARIES WITH BACKHOE TEST UNIT LOCATIONS (In order to preserve site integrity, this figure is not included for public disclosure) FIGURE 5 VIEW SOUTH ALONG CREEK AT NORTH END OF SITE (In order to preserve site integrity, this figure is not included for public disclosure) FIGURE 6 VIEW NORTH FROM CREEK BANK AT SOUTH END OF SITE (In order to preserve site integrity, this figure is not included for public disclosure) FIGURE 7 BTU 4 NORTH WALL FIGURE 8 BTU 9 NORTH WALL BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-39 ãíðí û í èð êèð ë ïðï ïûêóî îì ùíîèê ùíé êèð ëèð ëèð çî ûðûï÷ø èèð ïðï îèð û îíé ùðûê èé èë ïé ïðï éûî â öÓÕÇÊ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-40 ìêíò÷ùè ïóð÷é ñóðíï÷è÷êé öÓÕÇÊ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎçéõéùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÛÐÓÖ Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Page ð÷õ÷îø .WIDI!S'I'PJENICI&KTM é éè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñùíêêóøíêìûêñïûéè÷ê lllch 100 öÓÕÇÊ× ûìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Appendix Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page ð÷õ÷îø îè éè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñ éè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñùíêêóøíê éèíùñðï÷óê öÓÕÇÊ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Appendix Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page ð÷õ÷îø DNSCAEEJ'>TIWL éè÷æ÷îéùê÷÷ñùíêêóøíê úðûùñú÷êêãöûêï öÓÕÇÊ× ùìÊÍÒ×ÙÈûÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈ Appendix CultStevens Creek C ural Resource Assessmentorndor Master Plan Page N NOT TO Appendix B: Cultural Resource Assessment, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page B-45 ÙÔÛÊÙÍÛÐ öÓÕÇÊ×úèçîÍÊÈÔåÛÐÐ öÓÕÇÊ×úèçîÍÊÈÔåÛÐÐ City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration APPENDIX C PARKING ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED STEVENS CREEK PARK AND RESTORATION PHASE 2 PROJECT, HEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Appendix C: Parking Assessment for Proposed Stevens Creek Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Page C-1 Memorandum øÛÈ×ïÛÃ èÍùÔÊÓÉÈÓÎ×éÙÔÎ×ÓØ×Êèêû÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×ÉóÎÙ ùÔÊÓÉÈÓÎÛðÛÇèêû÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐéÙÓ×ÎÙ×ÉóÎÙ öÊÍÏõÓÙ×ÐÛø×ÐêÓÍ éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÛÊÑÓÎÕûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ìÔÛÉ× ÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ ô×ÄÛÕÍÎèÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉóÎÙÔÛÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÛÎÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÛÎØÖÇÈÇÊ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØèÊÛÓÐÓÎùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍèÔ×ÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈÅÛÉ ÏÛØ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÎØÖÊÍÏÈÔ× óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Ø î×ÕÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎóé ïîøÛÎØÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÎÛÐÃÉ×ÉÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎ Project Overview óÎ ÈÓÎÍÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÈÔ×óé ïîøÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑïÛÉÈ×Ê ìÐÛÎÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÇÌÕÊÛØ×ÉÛÎØ ÍÊÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÆÛÊÓÍÇÉ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÏ×ÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎ×ÅÈÊÛÓÐìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÅÛÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎ ÇØ×ØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÈÍÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈÓÎÕÏÇÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÅÎ×ØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÖÊÍÏÛÖ××ÚÛÉ×Ø É×ÛÉÍÎÛÐÇÉ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÕÊÍÇÎØÉÓÎÈÍÛÃ×ÛÊÊÍÇÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÐÉÍ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÍÛØÉÍÇÈÔÍÖïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ ìÛÊÑÈÍúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑ ìÔÛÉ× Ô×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐ ÖÍÍÈ ×É×ÕÏ×ÎÈÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏÓÈÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÈ×ÊÏÓÎÇÉÌÍÓÎÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÛÎ×ÅÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÛÎØÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØèÔ×Î×ÅÈÊÛÓÐ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÏÛÓÎÐÃÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ØÕ×ÍÖ ÈÔ×ÕÍÐÖÙÍÇÊÉ×ÛÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÉÍÇÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÅ×ÉÈÍÖ ÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ×èÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÛÉÛÙËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÓÎ ÚÇÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎÍÌ×Î×ØÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÚ×ÈÅ××Î×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÛÉ×ÅÛÐÑÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØ×ÄÌÛ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÛÎØÚÓÙÃÙÐ× Î×ÈÅÍÊÑ Existing Conditions Existing Parking Supply ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÔÛÉÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖÈÔÊ××Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÈÔÛÈÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ× ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ ÛÎêÛÎÙÔÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÎØ ÈÔ× úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈèÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ Appendix C: Parking Assessment for Proposed Stevens Creek Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Page C-2 Ì®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ Ð¿®µ·²¹ ß»³»²¬ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ó¿§ îðô îðïï ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÉÍÖÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É×ÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÚÐ×ûøûÉÌÛÙ×ÉèÔ×ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÔÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É ×ØÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÉÌÔÛÐÈ ÍÖÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ûøû ÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÎØÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÖÍÊÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÉÌÛÙ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎÇÎÉÈÊÓÌ×ØÛÊ×ÛÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ôÚÛÊÎÉÅÔÓÙÔ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÛÊ×Ù×ÎÈÐÃÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØûøûÉÈÛÐÐèÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É ûÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÉ×ÛÉÍÎ ÌÍÉÈÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖìÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑ ÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÓÈÅÛÉÊ×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÚÃùÓÈÃÉÈÛÖÖÓÎÛìÛÊÑÉÛÎØê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎéÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈØÛÈ×Ø íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÈÔÛÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÈúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÅÛÉÛÎÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÙÔÛÐÐ×ÎÕ×èÔ×Ê×ÌÍÊÈÉÈÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÛÈ ÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØ×ÄÙ××Ø×ØÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÓÏ×ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÏÍÎÈÔÉ ÍÖòÇÐÃÛÎØé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê éÈÛÖÖÏÛØ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÌ ÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ ÍÌÐ×Ì×ÊØÛÃÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÎØ ÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊÍÆ×ÊÖÐÍÅÓÎÉÈÛÎÙ×É Existing Parking Demand ûÖÈ×ÊÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÈÛÐÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÓÎ ÛÖÖÊ×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÓÎÛìÛÊÑÉÛÎØê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎéÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈØÛÈ×ØïÛÊÙÔ ÈÔÛÈ ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× É×ÛÉÍÎïÛÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÐÍÈ×ÄÙ××Ø×ØÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÃÍÎÐÃÍÎÙ×óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙÓÎÕÈÔ×ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÛÙÓÈÃÍÈÔ×Ê Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÐÉÍÅ×Ê×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÏÓÎÓÏÛÐÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÍÈÔ×Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØèÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÉÈÊÍÎÕÐÃ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕÓÎÕÙÛÊÌÍÍÐÉÊ×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕÉÈÛÖÖÈÍÌÛÊÑÛÈïÍÎÈÛæÓÉÈÛôÓÕÔéÙÔÍÍÐÍÎØÛÃÉÅÓÈÔ ÔÓÕÔ×ÄÌ×ÙÈÛÎÙÃÍÖÌÛÈÊÍÎÉÛÎØÔÓÊÓÎÕø×ÌÇÈÃéÔ×ÊÓÖÖÉÈÛÖÖÍÎ×Æ×ÎÈØÛÃÉÈÍÔ×ÐÌÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÎØ ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÙÍÎÕ×ÉÈÓÍÎ Proposed Project Conditions ûÉØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐ ÏÓÐ×É×ÕÏ×ÎÈÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏ ÓÈÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÈ×ÊÏÓÎÇÉÌÍÓÎÈÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÎØÍÌ×Î ÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×èÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÎ×ÅÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÛÎØÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉ ùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÔÓÙÔÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÉÚÓÑ×ÐÛÎ×ÉÛÎØÚÇÉÉÈÍÌÉÛÐÍÎÕÚÍÈÔÉÓØ×ÉÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÛÎ×ÅÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÅÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÛÙÊÍÉÉéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÍÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔÍÖ ÓÈÉÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔìÔÛÊðÛÌøÊÓÆ×èÔ×Î×ÅÙÊÍÉÉÅÛÐÑÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÎÍÊÈÔÍÖéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ Proposed Parking Supply ûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÎ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø Î×ÅÌÛÉÉ×ÎÕ×ÊÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÈÛÐÐÉÛÎØ ÚÇÉ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÈÍÚ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ õÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É ÖÍÊÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉîÍÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÇÌÌÐÃÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÛÎØïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎ êÛÎÙÔÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÉÛÊ×Ú×ÓÎÕÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØèÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÎ×ÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×Ê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÛÉÉ×ÎÕ×ÊÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÈÛÐÐÉÛÎØ ÇÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉèÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÛÎØÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÛÖÈ×ÊÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖ ìÔÛÉ× Ô×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÉÇÏÏÛÊÓÂ×ØÓÎèÛÚÐ× Appendix C: Parking Assessment for Proposed Stevens Creek Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Page C-3 Ì®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ Ð¿®µ·²¹ ß»³»²¬ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ó¿§ îðô îðïï Table 1 Existing and Proposed Number of Parking Spaces Serving the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Trail LocationExisting Number ofProposed Number of Parking SpacesParking Spaces úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏ ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØî û ÙÛÊ ÚÇÉ èÍÈÛÐ ÙÛÊÌÐÇÉ ÚÇÉ î×ÈóÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÙÛÊÌÐÇÉ ÚÇÉ Source: City of Cupertino, May 2011. Projected Parking Demand èÔ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÓÏÌÛÙÈÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×2006 Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan óé ïîø ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÚÃô×ÄÛÕÍÎÛÎØÉÇÏÏÛÊÓÂ×ØÓÎÛÏ×ÏÍÊ×ÌÍÊÈØÛÈ×Øé×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÍÛØÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÅÍÇÐØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ× ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Å××ÑØÛÃÛÇÈÍÈÊÓÌÉÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Å××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃÛÇÈÍÈÊÓÌÉÛÈ×ÛÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ÈÔÊ×× ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÉ×ÊÆÓÎÕÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊìÛÊÑÛÎØèÊÛÓÐèÔ×É×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐ ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÌ×ÊØÛÃ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÌÛÊÑÛÈ×ÛÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ÈÔÊ××ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉÉ×ÊÆÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÛÉÉÇÏÓÎÕÈÔÛÈÛÉÏÛÎÃÛÉÔÛÐÖÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØØÛÓÐÃÛÇÈÍÈÊÓÌÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ÅÍÇÐØÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ÛÙÔÍÖÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÊ×ÛÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÈÓÏ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÈÔÓÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÇÈÍÈÊÓÌÉÍÊÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃØÊÓÆÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÛÊ×ÛÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÈÓÏ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÈÍÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×É×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÙÍÎÙÇÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÛÊÑÉÛÎØê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÅÔÓÙÔÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÇÉÛÕ×ÛÈ ÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÍÎÎÍÎÌÓÙÎÓÙ ÌÍÍÐÇÉ×ØÛÃÉÓÉÆ×ÊÃÏÓÎÓÏÛÐÛÆ×ÊÛÕÓÎÕÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÌ×ÊØÛÃáÅÔ×ÎúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÉÉÅÓÏÏÓÎÕÌÍÍÐÉÛÎØÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÕÊÍÇÎØÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÍÌ×Îß úÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ×ÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÉ×ÕÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÇÎØ×ÊìÔÛÉ× ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÈÊÛÓÐ ÏÛÃÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ÛÈÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÈÅÍÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÍÌ×ÎÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎ êÛÎÙÔÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÉèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃ öÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÊÓÚÇÈÛÚÐ×ÉÍÐ×ÐÃÈÍÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛ Å××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃ óÈÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÎÍÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÈÔ×Preliminary Parking Analysis Stevens Creek Corridor Master PlanòÛÎÇÛÊÃ ÚÃô×ÄÛÕÍÎÉÈÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈÛÈÍÈÛÐÍÖ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× Î××Ø×ØÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÍÎÛÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÛÎ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÕ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ØÛÖÈ×Ê ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑùÍÊÊÓØÍÊïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×É Ê×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÈÍÓÎÈÔ×ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÊ×ÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÚÍÈÔÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ× éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÉÓÈ×ÈÔÛÈÅÛÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÛÈÈÔÛÈÈÓÏ×èÔ×ÖÇÈÇÊ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÐÏ×ÓÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÉ ÛÐÓÆÓÎÕÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÙ×ÎÈ×ÊÛÐ×ÕÛÙÃÖÛÊÏÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÓÉÎÍÈÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ Î××Ø×ØÖÍÊÉÇÙÔÛÇÉ×ÓÉÎÍÈÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈóÈÅÍÇÐØÚ××ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ØÅÔ×ÎÈÔ×ÖÇÈÇÊ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÓÉÌÇÊÉÇ×Ø ìÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÎØÈÔ×ïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÛÈÈÊÓÚÇÈÛÚÐ×ÈÍ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÏÛÓÎÇÎÙÔÛÎÕ×ØÖÊÍÏ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ Appendix C: Parking Assessment for Proposed Stevens Creek Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Page C-4 Ì®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ Ð¿®µ·²¹ ß»³»²¬ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ó¿§ îðô îðïï Other Supporting Studies ÷ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÍÖÈÔ×Stevens Creek Trail Reach 4, Segment 2 ÷óêùÓÈÃÍÖïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅòÇÎ× éÇÊÆ×ÃÉÅ×Ê×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÓÎÛÎØ ÛÐÍÎÕÍÌ×ÎÉÈÊ×ÈÙÔ×É ÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÓÎïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÉÇÙÔÛÉ ÏÍØ×ÍÖÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÈÍÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×Stevens Creek Trail Reach 4, Segment 2 Feasibility studyûÌÊÓÐ ÚÃîÍÐÈ×ÈÔ× ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐûÙÙ×ÉÉÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÍÖÈÔ× Å××ÑØÛÃÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÈÍÈÛÐÇÉ×ÊÉÖÍÊÍÎ×ØÛÃØÊÍÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ ÍÖÈÔ× Å××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÈÍÈÛÐÇÉ×ÊÉÖÍÊÍÎ×ØÛÃØÊÍÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔÓÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÎØ Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÅ××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃØÊÓÆÓÎÕÈÍÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ èÔ×òÇÐÃéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐçÉ×ÊÉÇÊÆ×ÃÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÈÔÛÈÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÈÍÈÛÐÇÉ×ÊÉÖÍÊÍÎ× ØÛÃÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃØÊÍÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐèÔ×Ê×ÏÛÓÎØ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÒÍÕÕ×Ø ÅÛÐÑ×Ø ÊÍÐÐ×ÊÉÑÛÈ×Ø ÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÍÊÊÍØ×ÈÔ×ÓÊÚÓÑ×ÉÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐÃÈÔ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×ØÈÔÛÈ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÐÓÆ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÍÎ×ÏÓÐ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÍÖÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÊÉÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÍÊ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÇÊÌÍÉ× èÔ× éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐûÙÙ×ÉÉÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÛÐÉÍÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ì×ÛÑÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÛÊÉÓÎÛÍÎ× ÔÍÇÊÌ×ÊÓÍØÌÛÊÑ×ØÛÈÛÈÊÛÓÐÔ×ÛØÅÛÉÉ×Æ×ÎÙÛÊÉÍÎÈÔ×Å××ÑØÛÃÛÎØ×ÓÕÔÈÙÛÊÉÍÎÈÔ×Å××Ñ×ÎØèÔ× ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÛÐÉÍÉÔÍÅ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ì×ÛÑÔÍÇÊÈÊÛÓÐÛÙÙ×ÉÉÆÍÐÇÏ×ÉÓÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÛÎØÍÖÈÔ×ÈÍÈÛÐØÛÓÐÃÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉØÇÊÓÎÕÛÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÛÅ××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃ èÔ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÊÍÏïÍÇÎÈÛÓ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÛÎØ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÚ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ØÉÍÐ×ÐÃÚÃÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÏÓÎÓÏÛÐÛÎØÈÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÊÛÓÐ ÇÉ×ÊÉÅÍÇÐØÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÈ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÉÈÊÛÓÐÉ×ÈÈÓÎÕÓÉÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃ ÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÛÎØÓÉÈÔ×Ú×ÉÈÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÐÍÙÛÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈÈÊÛÓÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØÛÎØÇÉ×ÊÉÔÓÌÓÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎ éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃÉÇÚÇÊÚÛÎÛÊ×ÛèÔÓÉÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÛÊÑÉÛÎØê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÅÔÓÙÔÎÍÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÅÛÐÑ ÍÊÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏÎ×ÛÊÚÃÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ Conclusions óÈÓÉ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑèÊÛÓÐÖÊÍÏÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈ ÈÍéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ× Ò×ÙÈÅÓÐÐ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛÅ××ÑØÛÃÛÎØÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÍÎÛ Å××Ñ×ÎØØÛÃÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÉÍÐ×ÐÃÈÍÉ×ÊÆ× ÈÊÛÓÐÇÉ×ÊÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÎÕÈÔ×Î×ÅÈÊÛÓÐ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÏÍØÓÖÃÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖ ùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÌÊÍÆÓØ× Î×ÅÍÎÉÈÊ××ÈÛÇÈÍÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÎØ ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕÓÎÛÎ×ÈÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÍÖÛÇÈÍÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÎØ ÚÇÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉèÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÌÛÙ×ÉÛÈÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏõÍÐÖùÍÇÊÉ× úÐÇ×ìÔ×ÛÉÛÎÈÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÅÍÇÐØ Ú×ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÌÛÊÑÓÎÕØ×ÏÛÎØØÇ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎèÔ×ìÔÛÉ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÎÍÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÈÔ×Î××ØÖÍÊÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÉÇÌÌÐÃÛÈÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕïÙùÐ×ÐÐÛÎêÛÎÙÔ ÛÎØúÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÉ öÇÊÈÔ×ÊÏÍÊ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÛÊÑÉÛÎØê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÛÖÖÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÉÛÎ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÇÉÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×úÐÛÙÑÚ×ÊÊÃöÛÊÏìÛÊÑÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÚÃùÓÈÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÆ×ÊÉÇÉÇÉÛÕ× ÚÃÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÐèÔ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÌÍÍÐÇÉ×ÊÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×ùÓÈÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÊÍÉ×ÖÊÍÏ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÓÎ ÈÍÓÎ ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÏÛØ×ÚÃùÓÈÃ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÊÍÉ×ÖÊÍÏÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃ ÓÎ ÓÎ õÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÈÍ ÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÃÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÐ×ÉÉÆ×ÔÓÙÇÐÛÊÈÊÓÌÉÈÍÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ûÔÓÕÔ×ÊÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉÏÛÃ ÎÍÅÐÓÆ×ÙÐÍÉ××ÎÍÇÕÔÈÍÅÛÐÑÍÊÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× Appendix C: Parking Assessment for Proposed Stevens Creek Park and Restoration Phase Project Page èÊÛÖÖÓÙÛÎØìÛÊÑÓÎÕéÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑìÛÊÑÛÎØê×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÃ åÓÈÔÈÔ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÛÎØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÍÖ ÇÉÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÐÍÈÉÚÃÈÔ×ÛÎØÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÛÐÐÍÅÛÚÐ×ØÛÓÐÃÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÙÛÌÛÙÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊ ÕÊÍÇÌÌÓÙÎÓÙÉÓÈ×ÉÎÍÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÛÊ× City of Cupertino Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration APPENDIX D TREE IMPACTS LISTS Appendix D: Tree Impacts List Page D-1 ßÐÐÛÒÜ×È Ü ÛÍÌ×ÓßÌÛÜ ÌÎÛÛ ÎÛÓÑÊßÔÍ ÚÑÎ ÍÌÛÊÛÒÍ ÝÎÛÛÕ ÝÑÎÎ×ÜÑÎ ÐØßÍÛ î ÐÎÑÖÛÝÌ ÛßÍÌ ÞßÒÕ Ý·¬§ Ò±ò Ï¬§ò Ü·¿ò Í°»½·» Ð®±¬»½¬»¼ Ý±³³»²¬ Û¿¬ ¾¿²µ ¿¬ °®±°±»¼ ¾®·¼¹»ò Ó¿§ ¾» °±·¾´» ®»¬¿·² ¼»°»²¼·²¹ ±² º·²¿´ °®±¶»½¬ ï ï ïëþ Ý±¿¬ Ô·ª» Ñ¿µô Ï«»®½« ¿¹®·º±´·¿ È ¼»·¹²ò Ý®»»µ ©·¼»²·²¹ ®»¯«·®» ®»³±ª¿´ò î ï îïþ Ó±²¬»®»§ Ý§°®»ô Ý«°®»« ³¿½®±½¿®°¿ Û¿¬ ¾¿²µ ²»¿® è¬¸ ¹®»»²ò Ý®»»µ ©·¼»²·²¹ ³¿§ ·³°¿½¬ ¬¸· ¬®»»ò í ï îéþ Ó±²¬»®»§ Ð·²»ô Ð·²« ®¿¼·¿¬¿ ×² ¼»½´·²»ò éþ ´¿®¹»¬ ¬®«²µ ú î ³¿´´»® ±²»ò Ò»¿® °®±°±»¼ ¾®·¼¹»ò ì ï Ó«´¬· Þ´«» Û´¼»®¾»®®§ô Í¿³¾«½« ³»¨·½¿²¿ Ò»¿® ¼±©²¬®»¿³ »²¼ ±º ®»¬±®¿¬·±²ò Ð®»ª·±«´§ ´·³¾»¼ò Ì®»» ³¿§ ¾» ·³°¿½¬»¼ ë ï îïþ É¿´²«¬ô Ö«¹´¿² °°ò ±® ®»³±ª»¼ò ÉÛÍÌ ÞßÒÕ Ý·¬§ Ò±ò Ï¬§ò Ü·¿ò Í°»½·» Ð®±¬»½¬»¼ Ý±³³»²¬ ê ï ïïþ É·´´±©ô Í¿´·¨ °°ò É»¬ ¾¿²µ ¿¬ ¾®·¼¹»ò í ³¿¶±® ´·³¾ èþô êþô ìþò Ó¿§ ¾» °±·¾´» ¬± ®»¬¿·²ò é ï ïëþô ïèþ Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Þ«½µ»§»ô ß»½«´« ½¿´·º±®²·½¿ È Ù®±©·²¹ ¿³·¼¬ ¬¿²¼ ±º ß®«²¼± ¼±²¿¨ò Ü±«¾´» ¬®«²µò è ï ïêþ É¿´²«¬ô Ö«¹´¿² °°ò ç ï ïìþ É¿´²«¬ô Ö«¹´¿² °°ò ïð ï ïéþ É¿´²«¬ô Ö«¹´¿² °°ò ïï ï Ó«´¬· Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Þ«½µ»§»ô ß»½«´« ½¿´·º±®²·½¿ Í°®±«¬·²¹ º®±³ ¿ ¬«³°ò Ì©± ëþ ¬®«²µ °´« ³¿´´»® ¾®¿²½¸»ò Ì®»» ®»³±ª¿´ ¯«¿²¬·¬§ ¼»°»²¼ ±² º·²¿´ ¼»·¹² ±º ¾¿½µ©¿¬»®ô ¬®¿·´ ú ±¬¸»® °®±¶»½¬ ïî é íï Ê¿®·»ô Ñ®¿²¹»ô Ý·¬®« ·²»²· »´»³»²¬ò ¬§°ò ÐÑÍÍ×ÞÔÛ ÎÛÓÑÊßÔÍ ÚÑÎ ÌÎÛÛ ØÛßÔÌØ Ý·¬§ Ò±ò Ï¬§ò Ü·¿ò Í°»½·» Ð®±¬»½¬»¼ Ý±³³»²¬ ïí îð Ê¿®·» É¿´²«¬ô Ö«¹´¿² °°ò Ì®»» «ºº»® º®±³ ¿ ª·®¿´ ¼·»¿» ú ®»³±ª¿´ · ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ò ¿°°®±¨ò ÑÌØÛÎ Ý·¬§ Ò±ò Ï¬§ò Ü·¿ò Í°»½·» Ð®±¬»½¬»¼ Ý±³³»²¬ Ê¿®·» Ó·¨»¼ ¾¿²µ ª»¹»¬¿¬·±² Ó·¨»¼ §±«²¹ ú «²¼»®¬±®§ ª»¹»¬¿¬·±² ©·´´ ¾» ®»³±ª»¼ º®±³ »¿¬ ¾¿²µ ú ¿¬ ½¸¿²²»´ ¼±©²¬®»¿³ ±º ²»© ¾®·¼¹» ¬± ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» ®»¬±®¿¬·±²ò Í°»½·» ·²½´«¼» ©»»¬ º»²²»´ô Ø·³¿´¿§¿² ¾´¿½µ¾»®®§ô ª·²½¿ô ©·´´±©ô »´¼»®¾»®®§ô ±¬¸»® ²¿¬·ª» ¿²¼ ²±²²¿¬·ª» °»½·»ò Î»³±ª¿´ ·²½´«¼» ¬©± îþ ½±¿¬ ´·ª» ±¿µ ·² °±±® ¸»¿´¬¸ ¹®±©·²¹ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ½±²½®»¬» ½¸¿²²»´ ´·²·²¹ò ÌÎß ëìëÓ·¼¼´»º·»´¼Î±¿¼ôÍ«·¬»îðð Ó»²´±Ð¿®µôÝßçìðîëíìéî Ì»´æøêëð÷íîéðìîç ÛÒÊ×ÎÑÒÓÛÒÌßÔ Ú¿¨æøêëð÷íîéìðîì ÍÝ×ÛÒÝÛÍô×²½ò ©©©òÌÎß»²ª·®±ò½±³ Ó»³± To: City of Cupertino, Department of Public Works From: Christina Lau, TRA Project Manager Subject: Responses to Comments on IS/MND for the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Dated July 2011 Date: September 12, 2011 The City of Cupertino has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project (Project). The City of Cupertino is the Lead Agency for the project. The 30-day public review period for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project (Project)(SCH 2011072045) began on July 21, 2011 and closed on August 19, 2011. The City, as the Lead Agency for the project has collected written comments and oral comments made during the City’s Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting held on August 18, 2011. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statutes or Guidelines do not have any provision stipulating that a Lead Agency must respond to comments generated during the public comment period of an IS/MND. Section 15074 (b) of the CEQA Guidelines states that, “Prior to approving a project, the decision making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis.” While the City of Cupertino may make findings and approve the project without a formal response to comments received during the 30-day public review period, it is the City’s intent to offer responses to those comments that were received. Written comments were received from one state agency, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and seven members of the public. Oral comments were heard during an ERC meeting held on August 18, 2011. The organization of this memo is as follows: A.Copies of the Comments Received B.Responses to Comments C.Errata and Text Changes to the IS/MND September 12, 2011 TRA Environmental Sciences Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» î Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ A.Copies of Comment Letters Received The City of Cupertino received the following commentsduring the public comment period for the IS/MND: A) California Department of Transportation B) John Buenz C) Rhoda Fry D)Mindy Grant E) Joanne McFarlin F) Deborah Jamison G) Barbara Stocklmeir H) Comments made during the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting held on August 18, 2011. I) State of California, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Comments are indicated with a vertical line in the right margin and numbered sequentially.The exceptions arefor items H) and I) listed above. Item H) are oral comments from a public meeting for whichminutes weresubsequently issued. Item I) is provided to be included as part of the public record;the letter itself requires no response as it merely documents the close of the official public comment period and includes the comment letters received from other State Agencies (California Department of Transportation, shown as Comment letter A), above). Copies of the comment letters appear on the following pages. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» í Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êû û Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ì Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ë Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êú From: John Buenz [mailto:jbuenz0835@att.net] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:34 AM To: CapitalProjects Cc: Robert George; Dale Compton Subject: initial study óÛÏÛÆ×ÊÃÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÔÍÏ×ÍÅÎ×ÊÓÎÈÔ×ï×ÛØÍÅÉÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÅÔÍÉ× ÌÊÍÉÌ×ÊÓÈÃÐÓÎ×ÖÍÊÏÉÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×éÈÍÙÑÏ×ÓÊÍÊÙÔÛÊØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ× ÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÍÖÃÍÇÊÌÔÛÉ× ÈÊÛÓÐÓÉÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÌÛÉÉ ú óÎÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÓÎÕÃÍÇÊÍÎÐÓÎ×ÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈóÎÍÈ×ÈÔÛÈÌÛÕ×ÉÔÍÅÉÛÎ Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÂÍÎ×ÛÎØÌÛÕ×ÉÔÍÅÉÛÎ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÂÍÎ×ÛÎØ ÈÔ×ÈÅÍÛÊ×ÊÛÈÔ×ÊØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÛÉÈÍÈÔ×ÓÊÊ×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌÈÍÈÔ×ÍÊÙÔÛÊØèÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÈÊÛÓÐ ÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÂÍÎ×ÓÉÏÇÙÔÎ×ÛÊ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ï×ÛØÍÅÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÓÎ×ÌÛÉÉÓÎÕÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ× ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÛÎØÍÇÊÔÍÏ×ÉÈÔÛÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÆ×ÊÉÓÍÎê×Ï×ÏÚ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÎÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÛÉÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÈÊÛÓÐÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈÂÍÎ×óÛÉÑÅÔÃÛÊ× ÈÔ×Ê×ÈÅÍÂÍÎ×ÉÎÍÅÚ×ÓÎÕÉÔÍÅÎÛÎØÛÌÌÛÊ×ÎÈÐÃÚ×ÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×Øý ûÐÉÍÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÂÍÎ×ÓÉÏÇÙÔÎ×ÛÊ×ÊÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÛÖÖÍÊØÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÚÐÃÏÍÊ× ú ÓÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÈÔÛÎÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÂÍÎ×èÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÂÍÎ×ÌÛÉÉ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ× ÍÊÙÔÛÊØÓÈÉÉ×ÐÖÛÎØÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÚÍÊ×ÓÎÕ ÎÍÎÙÊ××ÑÛÐÓÕÎÏ×ÎÈèÔÓÉÓÉÈÍÚ×ÙÊ××ÑÈÊÛÓÐ óÛÅÛÓÈÛÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÖÊÍÏÃÍÇÛÎØóÈÔÛÎÑÃÍÇÖÍÊÃÍÇÊÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ òÍÔÎúÇ×ÎÂ ø×ÛÎùÈ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍùÛ ÒÚÇ×ÎÂ üÛÈÈÎ×È Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ê Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êù From:Rhoda Fry To:CapitalProjects Subject:CEQA comments on Stevens Creek Corridor Date:Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:06:51 PM ÝÛÏß ½±³³»²¬ ±² Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±®ô °´»¿» ½±²º·®³ ®»½»·°¬ Ü»¿® Ý¿°·¬¿´ Ð®±¶»½¬æ Ú·®¬ ±º ¿´´ô × ®»¿´´§ ´·µ» ¬¸» ½±´±® ½¸±·½» ±º ¬¸» ¸¿®¼ ¬®¿·´ ¿¬ Í½»²·½ Ý·®½´» ·¬ ©¿ ¿ «°»®·±® ½¸±·½» ¬± ù ¬¸» ¸¿®¼ ¬®¿·´ ¬¸®±«¹¸ Ó½Ý´»´´¿² Î¿²½¸ò × ®»¿´·¦» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸· · ²±¬ ¿ ÝÛÏß ½±³³»²¬ô ¸±©»ª»®ô × ¼± ¸±°» ¬¸¿¬ §±«´´ ¬¿µ» ·¬ ·²¬± ½±²·¼»®¿¬·±² ©·¬¸ §±«® °´¿²ò ß × ¸¿ª» ½±³³»²¬»¼ ±² °®»ª·±« °±®¬·±² ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬æ ¬¸» ¼±½«³»²¬ º¿·´ ¬± ·²½´«¼» ¬¸» ù ½±²²»½¬·±² ±º ¬¸· ¬®¿·´ ¬± ¬¸» ¹®»¿¬»® ¬®¿·´ §¬»³ ¬¸» Ò¿¬·±²¿´ Ü» ß²¦¿ Ì®¿·´ ¸¬¬°æññ©©©ò²°ò¹±ªñ¶«¾¿ñ·²¼»¨ò¸¬³ ¿²¼ ¬¸· ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ±³··±² ¬± ½±²·¼»® º«¬«®» ½±²²»½¬·±² ¿²¼ ¬¸»·® ·³°¿½¬ · ²±¬ ½±²·¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ÝÛÏßò ß²±¬¸»® ·«» ¬¸¿¬ ¸¿ ²±¬ ¾»»² ¬«¼·»¼ · ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °®±¹®¿³³·²¹ ¿¬ ¬¸» Í¬±½µ´³»·® °®±°»®¬§ò É» ù µ²±© ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»®» · ·²«ºº·½·»²¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ¿¬ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ ®·¹¸¬ ²±© ¬¸¿¬ °·´´ ±ª»® ·²¬± ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ¿²¼ × ¾»´·»ª» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹ °®±°±»¼ ©·´´ ²±¬ ¾» «ºº·½·»²¬ ¬± ¸¿²¼´» Í¬±½µ´³»·® °®±¹®¿³³·²¹ò × ©±«´¼ ´·µ» ¬± »» ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ´±±µ ·²¬± ®»ó¬®·°·²¹ Ó½Ý´»´´¿² Î¿²½¸ °¿®µ·²¹ ù ´±¬ ¿ ©»´´ ¬± »» ·º ³±®» °¿®µ·²¹ ½¿² ¾» ¿¼¼»¼ ¬¸»®»ò ß² »¿®´§ ¹±¿´ ±º ¬¸· °®±¶»½¬ ©¿ ¬± ¸¿ª» ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ±² ¬¸» ±«¬·¼» ±² ³¿¶±® ®±¿¼ ¿²¼ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» ·²·¼» ¾» °¿®µ´¿²¼ò × ¼± ¿°°´¿«¼ ¬¸» °´¿²²»® º±® ¿¼¼·²¹ ³±®» °¿®µ·²¹ ¬¸¿² ±®·¹·²¿´´§ °´¿²²»¼ô ¾«¬ × ¬·´´ ¾»´·»ª» ©»®» º¿´´·²¹ ¸±®¬ò É» µ²±© ¬¸¿¬ °®±¹®¿³³·²¹ ½¸¿²¹» ¬¸¿¬ ¿°°»¿® ¬± ¾» ·²²±½«±« ½¿² ®»«´¬ ·² ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ù ½«³«´¿¬·ª» ·³°¿½¬ò Ú±® »¨¿³°´»ô °®»ª·±«´§ ¬¸» ¼®·ª»©¿§ ¬± Þ´¿½µ¾»®®§ Ú¿®³ Ð·½²·½ Ù®±«²¼ ¸¿¼ »»²¬·¿´´§ ±°»®¿¬»¼ ¿ ¿ ±²»ó©¿§ ¼®·ª»©¿§ò Ð»±°´» ©±«´¼ ¬»²¼ ¬± ¬¿§ ¬¸» ¼¿§ ¿²¼ ¼®·ª» ·²ò Ó±¬ ßÓ ¬®¿ºº·½ ©¿ ·²½±³·²¹ ¿²¼ ³±¬ ÐÓ ¬®¿ºº·½ ©¿ ±«¬¹±·²¹ò ß ª»®§ °±·¬·ª» ½¸¿²¹» ±º «» ¸¿ ¾»»² ·²½®»¿·²¹ Ý«°»®¬·²± ®»·¼»²¬ «» ±º ±«® °¿®µ´¿²¼ò Ë²º±®¬«²¿¬»´§ô ·¬ ¸¿ ¹·ª»² ®·» ¬± «²¿¼¼®»»¼ °®»¼·½¬»¼ ½·®½«³¬¿²½»ò Ò¿³»´§ô °»±°´» ½±³» ¿²¼ ¹± ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» ¼¿§ ½®»¿¬·²¹ îó©¿§ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ ¿´± ½±³» ¾§ º±±¬ ¿²¼ ¾§ ¾·½§½´» ´»¿¼·²¹ ¬± ¿º»¬§ ·«»ò × ¿³ ¼»»°´§ ½±²½»®²»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ¸¿ ¿¼¼»¼ ³±®²·²¹ °®±¹®¿³³·²¹ ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» «³³»® ¿¬ Þ´¿½µ¾»®®§ Ú¿®³ô ©¸·½¸ »²½±«®¿¹» ³±®» îó ©¿§ ¸±®¬ ¬®·° ±² ¬¸» ¼®·ª»©¿§ ¿²¼ ¸¿¦¿®¼±« ·²¬»®»½¬·±² ø¼»½®·¾»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» °®»ª·±« ¸»¿¼ ±º °«¾´·½ ©±®µ ¿ ¿ ½¸±µ» °±·²¬÷ ¿²¼ »¨¿½¬´§ ¿¬ ¬¸» ¬·³» ©¸»² ®»·¼»²¬ ¿®» ¼±¹ ©¿´µ·²¹ò Ì¸· · ¿ ®»½·°» º±® ¿² ¿½½·¼»²¬ ¬± ¸¿°°»²ò ù ×²¬®± Ð¿¹» íæ ß´¬¸±«¹¸ ¿ °·½µ§ °±·²¬ô Ð¸¿» × ¸¿ ²±¬ ¾»»² ½±³°´»¬»¼ò Ñ²» ³¿¶±® ¿®»¿ · ¬¸» ©»¬´¿²¼ ¸¿¾·¬¿¬ ©¸·½¸ ©¿ ¼»¬®±§»¼ ¼«®·²¹ ½±²¬®«½¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»¬±®¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ©¿¬»® §¬»³ò × «²¼»®¬¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸· ¸¿ ¾»»² °´¿²²»¼ º±®ô ¸±©»ª»®ô ·¬ · ·²¿½½«®¿¬» ¬± ¬¿¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ · ½±³°´»¬»ò × ¿³ ¿´± ¸±°»º«´ ¬¸¿¬ ¼»½¿§·²¹ ¾«·´¼·²¹ ¿¬ Ó½Ý´»´´¿² Î¿²½¸ ¸¿´´ ¾» ³¿·²¬¿·²»¼ ¿ ù »¨°»½¬»¼ò × ¿³ ·³°®»»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ²»© ¸»¿¼ ±º °«¾´·½ ©±®µ ¿²¼ ¸· ¼»¼·½¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ¼»·®» ¬± °®±¬»½¬ ¬®»»ò ù Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» é Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Ð¹ ïêæ Ô±±µ ´·µ» ¬¸»®» · ¿² ¿®»¿ ©¸»®» ¬¸»®» ©·´´ ²±¬ ¾» ®»¬±®¿¬·±² ²»¿® ¬¸» ¾®·¼¹»ô ¬¸¿¬ ¬±± ù ¾¿¼ò × ¸¿¼ ¾»»² ¬±´¼ ¿¬ ¿ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ ¿²¼ Ð»®³¿²»²¬» É¿¬»®¸»¼ ³»»¬·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¾®·¼¹» ¿¬ Í¬»ª»² ù Ý®»»µ · ©»»µ ¿²¼ ³·¹¸¬ ²±¬ ©·¬¸¬¿²¼ ¿ º´±±¼ ½±²¼·¬·±²ò × ¸±°» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ±º Ý«°»®¬·²± ½¿² ´±±µ ·²¬± ¬¸¿¬ ¾»º±®» ©» ¸¿ª» ¿ º´±±¼ ·¬«¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»·¼»²¬ ¸±³» ½±«´¼ ¾» ¼¿³¿¹»¼ò Ð¿¹» íéô »²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ ½¸»½µ´·¬ ¸¿®¼ ¬± «²¼»®¬¿²¼ ¸±© ¿ ½±²²»½¬·±² ¬± ¿ Ò¿¬·±²¿´ Ì®¿·´ ©±«´¼ ù ®»«´¬ ±²´§ ·² ïí ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ©»»µ¼¿§ ª»¸·½´» ¬®·° ¿²¼ íì ©»»µ»²¼ ª»¸·½´» ¬®·° ©±«´¼ «¹¹»¬ ¿ »½±²¼ ´±±µ ¿¬ ¬¸·ò Ûª»² ©·¬¸ ¬¸¿¬ ²«³¾»® ±º íìô ·¬ »»³ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹ °®±°±»¼ ©±«´¼ ¾» ·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»ò Ð¿¹» ëçæ × ¼±²¬ ¹»¬ ©¸§ ©» ¼±²¬ µ²±© ¼»º·²·¬·ª»´§ ©¸»®» ¬¸» ¾¿¬ ÏÛÃÉÈÓÐÐÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÊÍÍÉÈÈÊ××¨ ù ¿®» ®±±¬·²¹ ¬¸»» ¼¿§ò Í»»³ ¬¸¿¬ ©» ¸±«´¼ µ²±© ¬¸¿¬ ¾»º±®» ½±²¬®«½¬·±² ¾»¹·²ò Ð¿¹» êîæ ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ «¼¼»² ±¿µ ¼»¿¬¸ò × ¸±°» ¬¸» ½·¬§ · ´±±µ·²¹ ·²¬± ½«®®»²¬ »¨°±«®» ¬± «¼¼»² ù ±¿µ ¼»¿¬¸ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ½±®®·¼±® ¿²¼ ¼»¿´·²¹ ©·¬¸ ¬¸»³ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬»´§ò Ù»²»®¿´ Ý±³³»²¬ ×³ ½±²º·¼»²¬ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ²»© ´»¿¼»®¸·° ·² ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ©·´´ »²«®» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ÞÓÐ ù ¿®» «»¼ ¿²¼ ¿°°´·»¼ º±® ¬¸· °¸¿» ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ×³ ´±±µ·²¹ º±®©¿®¼ ¬± ¬¸» ¾« ¬«®²±«¬ ±² Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µò Ì¸» ±²» ¿¬ Ó½Ý´»´´¿² Î¿²½¸ ¸¿ ¾»»² ¿ ù ©»´½±³» ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¿²¼ × »ª»² ¹±¬ ¬± «» ·¬ ±² ³§ ±² º·»´¼ ¬®·°ò Î»¿´´§ ²·½» ¬± ¸¿ª» ¿ ¿º» ¼®±°ó±ºº °±·²¬ º±® ½¸·´¼®»²ò Ð¿¹» Ýóíô ßÙß×Ò ·¬ · ·²¿°°®±°®·¿¬» «²¼»® ÝÛÏß ¬± ²±¬ ½±²·¼»® ·³°¿½¬ ø°¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»®÷ º®±³ ù ¬¸» º«¬«®» ´·ª·²¹ ¸·¬±®§ ½»²¬»®ò ß°°»²¼·¨ Üæ ×¬ · «²º±®¬«²¿¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¬®»» ´·¬ °®±ª·¼»¼ · ³»®»´§ ¿² »¬·³¿¬» ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ °®±¬»½¬»¼ù ¬®»» ¿®» ¿´®»¿¼§ ½¸»¼«´»¼ º±® ®»³±ª¿´ò É¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¬¸» °®±½» ¾» ·º ³±®» ¬®»» ¿®» ½¸»¼«´»¼ º±® ®»³±ª¿´á Ø±© ©·´´ ¬¸¿¬ ¿ºº»½¬ ¬¸» ÝÛÏß °®±½»á Î»°»½¬º«´´§ «¾³·¬¬»¼ô Î¸±¼¿ Ú®§ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» è Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êø From:Mindy Grant To:CapitalProjects Subject:Stevens Creek trail extension Date:Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:02:08 AM Please continue the trail through the property to Stevens Creek Blvd.! ø It would be great if we walkers could go all the way through. The proposed extension is not a very long distance, so we really hope you will approve it. Here are four votes for the extension! --The Grant family, Cupertino Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ç Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Ê÷ ß«¹«¬ïçôîðïï Ù¿·´Í»»¼ Ý·¬§±ºÝ«°»®¬·²±ôÜ»°¿®¬³»²¬±ºÐ«¾´·½É±®µ ïðíððÌ±®®»ßª»²«» Ý«°»®¬·²±ôÝßçëðïì Î»æÝ±³³»²¬±²Í¬»ª»²Ý®»»µÝ±®®·¼±®Ð¿®µ¿²¼Î»¬±®¿¬·±²Ð¸¿»îÐ®±¶»½¬ô×²·¬·¿´Í¬«¼§ ¿²¼Ó·¬·¹¿¬»¼Ò»¹¿¬·ª»Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² Ü»¿®ÓòÍ»»¼ô Ý±²¹®¿¬«´¿¬·±²¿²¼¬¸¿²µº±®¬¸»¿³¿¦·²¹¶±¾§±«¸¿ª»¼±²»·²¾±¬¸Ð¸¿»ï¿²¼Ð¸¿»î±º¬¸» Í¬»ª»²Ý®»»µÝ±®®·¼±®Ð¿®µ¿²¼Î»¬±®¿¬·±²ÿÑ²®»¿¼·²¹±ª»®¬¸»³·¬·¹¿¬»¼²»¹¿¬·ª»¼»½´¿®¿¬·±²ô×¼± ¸¿ª»¿º»©½±³³»²¬æ Í»½¬·±²îòêòïô°¿¹»ë Âª¿²¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¸±®¬º±±¬°¿¬¸±ºº¬¸»³¿·²¬®¿·´¿²¼¿°±¬º±®½®»»µª·»©·²¹³¿§¾»ÈÁ Ý±³³»²¬æ Ì¸·±«²¼¹®»¿¬ô¾±¬¸º±®½¿«¿´¬®¿·´«»®¬±¾»¿¾´»¬±¬»°±ºº¬¸»¬®¿·´º±®¿¾·¬±º°»¿½»ô ÷ ¯«·»¬ô¿²¼©·´¼´·º»ª·»©·²¹¿©»´´¿º±®»¼«½¿¬·±²¿´¹®±«°¬±¸¿ª»½®»»µ¿½½»ò×²¬¸»°·®·¬±º»¬¬·²¹ ¿·¼»±³»°¿®¬±º¬¸»®»¬±®»¼®·°¿®·¿²¿®»¿¿®»´¿¬·ª»´§«²¼·¬«®¾»¼¸¿¾·¬¿¬ô¸±©»ª»®ô×¸±°»§±«°«¬ ¬¸·º±±¬°¿¬¸²»¿®¬¸»¬®¿·´¾®·¼¹»©¸»®»¬¸»®»©·´´¿´®»¿¼§¾»¿½±²·¼»®¿¾´»¸«³¿²°®»»²½»ò Í»½¬·±²îòêòïô°¿¹»ê¿²¼Í»½¬·±²îòêòìô°¿¹»è ÂÇÆ£kªÃ±Å¼·®»½¬·±²©¿¬±½±²·¼»®¿´·¹²³»²¬¬¸¿¬©»®»´±½¿¬»¼²±º¿®¬¸»®©»¬¬¸¿²¬¸»Â£ª ®±©±º±®½¸¿®¼ÁË·ò»ò¬¸»®±©±º±®¿²¹»¬®»»¬¸¿¬·»½±²¼½´±»¬¬±¬¸»°®±°»®¬§´·²»©¸·½¸¿¾«¬ Ì¸»Ó»¿¼±©±ºÝ«°»®¬·²±òß½±²½»°¬«¿´¹®¿°¸·½±º¬¸·°±¬»²¬·¿´©»¬»®²³±¬¦±²»º±®¬®¿·´¿´·¹²³»²¬ ½¬·±²©¿¬±½±²·¼»®¿¬®¿·´¿´·¹²³»²¬´±½¿¬»¼¿´±²¹¬¸» ·¸±©²±²Ú·¹«®»îíòÌ¸»£kªÃ±Åº«®¬¸»®¼·®» »¿¬»®´§·¼»±º¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼¹»²»®¿´´§°¿®¿´´»´·²¹¬¸»½®»»µ¿²¼¿´´±©·²¹¿²¿¼»¯«¿¬»¾«ºº»®¿®»¿¿´±²¹ ¬¸»½®»»µ»¼¹»òß½±²½»°¬«¿´¹®¿°¸·½±º¬¸·°±¬»²¬·¿´»¿¬»®´§¦±²»º±®¬®¿·´¿´·¹²³»²¬·¸±©²±²Ú·¹«®» î1ÈÁ Âkøø¼·¬¿²½»©·´´ª¿®§¼»°»²¼·²¹«°±²¬¸»´±½¿¬·±²ô¿²¼±²¬¸»©»¬¾¿²µ¿´±²¹¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼°±®¬·±² ±º¬¸»Í¬±½µ´³»·®·¬»³¿§¬§°·½¿´´§®¿²¹»¾»¬©»»²ïð¿²¼îëº»»¬òÑ²¬¸»©»¬¾¿²µ¿´±²¹¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼ô·¬ ·»¬·³¿¬»¼¬¸¿¬²¿¬·ª»°´¿²¬·²¹¦±²»³¿§¬§°·½¿´´§»¨¬»²¼®±«¹¸´§íð¬±ìðº»»¬º®±³¬¸»½«®®»²¬ ½¸¿²²»´½»²¬»®´·²»ô¸±©»ª»®¬¸»°´¿²¬·²¹©·¼¬¸©·´´ª¿®§¼»°»²¼·²¹±²¬¸»°»½·º·½·¬»½±²¼·¬·±²¿²¼ º·²¿´ÃÐªÈÁ Ý±³³»²¬æ Ó¿²§°»±°´»¿®»²±¬¿©¿®»¬¸¿¬¬¸»¸«³¿²¼·¬«®¾¿²½»¿±½·¿¬»¼©·¬¸°«¾´·½¿½½»¬± ÷ ½®»»µ¿®»¿¿ºº»½¬¸¿¾·¬¿¬¯«¿´·¬§ò×²°¿®¬·½«´¿®ô·³°¿½¬º®±³¬¸»«»±º®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´¬®¿·´²»¿®®·°¿®·¿² ¿®»¿¿®»¹®»¿¬´§«²¼»®»¬·³¿¬»¼¾§¬¸»°«¾´·½òÞ»½¿«»±º¬¸»·®¹®»¿¬´§ª¿®§·²¹¼·¬¿²½»º®±³¬¸» ®·°¿®·¿²½±®®·¼±®ô¬¸»°®±°±»¼»¿¬»®²¿²¼©»¬»®²¬®¿·´¿´·¹²³»²¬®»º»®®»¼¬±¿¾±ª»©±«´¼¸¿ª» ª¿¬´§¼·ºº»®»²¬»²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´·³°¿½¬òÌ¸»¼·ºº»®»²½»·²·³°¿½¬¬¸»»¬©±¼·ºº»®·²¹¿´·¹²³»²¬©±«´¼ ï Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïð Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ¸¿ª»±²¬¸»¯«¿´·¬§±º¸¿¾·¬¿¬©»¬±º¬¸»½®»»µ·»°»½·¿´´§·³°±®¬¿²¬¹·ª»²¬¸¿¬¬¸»»¿¬·¼»¸¿ ÷ ÙÍÎÈØ ¿´®»¿¼§¾»»²¸»¿ª·´§½±³°®±³·»¼¾§¬¸»¹±´º½±«®»ò ß´¿®¹»¾±¼§±º®»»¿®½¸¼»¬¿·´¬¸»·³°¿½¬©¸·½¸®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´¬®¿·´¸¿ª»±²¬¸»«®®±«²¼·²¹¸¿¾·¬¿¬ò Ú±®·²¬¿²½»ô±²»¬«¼§¸±©»¼¬¸¿¬»ª»²©¸»²¾·®¼½±³³«²·¬·»·²®·°¿®·¿²¿®»¿¸¿ª»¾»»²¸»¿ª·´§ ·³°¿½¬»¼¾§«®¾¿²·¦¿¬·±²·²«®®±«²¼·²¹´¿²¼ô¬¸»°®»»²½»±º¸·µ»®ô¶±¹¹»®¿²¼¾·½§½´»®¿´±²¹¿ ®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´¬®¿·´¸¿ª»¿·¹²·º·½¿²¬º«®¬¸»®·³°¿½¬ô»°»½·¿´´§±²°»½·»¬¸¿¬²»¬½´±»¬±¬¸»¹®±«²¼±® ï º±®¿¹»´±©º±®·²»½¬±®»»¼ò×²³¿²§½¿»ô¼·¬«®¾¿²½»º®±³¸«³¿²¿½¬·ª·¬§·¬¸»³±¬·³°±®¬¿²¬ º¿½¬±®¿ºº»½¬·²¹¬¸»²«³¾»®±º¾·®¼°»½·»ô«®°¿·²¹»ª»²¬¸»»ºº»½¬º®±³¸¿¾·¬¿¬´±¼«»¬± î ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò Ì¸»®»º»®»²½»¬±ÂkøøÁ·²¬¸»¼±½«³»²¬·±³»©¸¿¬½±²º«·²¹ò×¬»»³¬±¶«¬®»º»®¬±¬¸»¦±²»±º ÷ °®±°±»¼¬»®®»¬®·¿´®»¬±®¿¬·±²¿¼¶¿½»²¬¬±¬¸»½®»»µò×¬¸·²µ¬¸»¾«ºº»®½¿²³±®»º«²½¬·±²¿´´§¾» ¼»º·²»¼¿¬¸»¬±¬¿´¿®»¿¾»¬©»»²¬¸»½®»»µ¿²¼¬¸»°»¼»¬®·¿²ñ¾·µ»¬®¿·´¿´·¹²³»²¬òÌ¸·©±«´¼·²½´«¼» ¬¸»¿®»¿©·¬¸·²¬¸»°®±°±»¼¬»®®»¬®·¿´¸¿¾·¬¿¬®»¬±®¿¬·±²¿²¼¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼»¿¬±º¬¸»¬®¿·´¬¿´´¸¿¾·¬¿¬ ¬¸¿¬©±«´¼¾»®»´¿¬·ª»´§«²¼·¬«®¾»¼¾§¬¸»¿½¬·ª·¬§¿±½·¿¬»¼©·¬¸¬®¿·´«¿¹»òÌ¸»º¿®¬¸»®¬¸»¬®¿·´· º®±³¬¸»½®»»µô¬¸»¸·¹¸»®¬¸»¯«¿´·¬§±º¬¸»¸¿¾·¬¿¬±º´¿²¼¿¼¶¿½»²¬¬±¬¸»½®»»µ»ª»²·²¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼ ¿®»¿ò Í»½¬·±²îòêòìô°¿¹»è ÂkÃª£©·´´³¿·²¬¿·²¬¸»·¬»¿º¬»®½±²¬®«½¬·±²ô¿²¼°´¿²¬±³±²·¬±®¬¸»°®±¹®»±º¬¸»®»¬±®¿¬·±² º±®«°¬±º·ª»YÈÁ ÷ Ý±³³»²¬æ Ö«¼¹·²¹º®±³¬¸»³¿²§²±²²¿¬·ª»·²ª¿·ª»°´¿²¬©¸·½¸¸¿ª»®»»¬¿¾´·¸»¼¬¸»³»´ª»©·¬¸ ±³»ª·¹±®©·¬¸·²¬¸»Þ´¿½µ¾»®®§Ú¿®³Ð¸¿»ï®»¬±®¿¬·±²¿®»¿ô×¸±°»¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÝ«°»®¬·²±³¿µ» °´¿²¬±¼»¿´©·¬¸¬¸»°®±¾´»³·²Ð¸¿»îòß¼³·¬¬»¼´§ô¬¸··¯«·¬»¿½¸¿´´»²¹»òÎ»³±ª·²¹·²ª¿·ª»°´¿²¬ ©·¬¸±«¬¼¿³¿¹·²¹¬¸»«®®±«²¼·²¹²¿¬·ª»°´¿²¬·¬·³»½±²«³·²¹¿²¼»¨°»²·ª»òÐ´«ô×¿³«²¼»®¬¸» ·³°®»·±²¬¸¿¬³¿²§°¿®µ³¿·²¬»²¿²½»©±®µ»®¿®»²±¬«®»©¸·½¸¿®»¬¸»²¿¬·ª»¿²¼©¸·½¸¿®»¬¸» ·²ª¿·ª»°´¿²¬òÎ»½®«·¬·²¹½¿«¿´ª±´«²¬»»®¬±¼±¬¸»©»»¼·²¹·´·µ»´§¬±¼±³±®»¸¿®³¬¸¿²¹±±¼ò× ¾»´·»ª»¿¹±±¼¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»©±«´¼¾»º±®¬¸»Ý·¬§¬±°¿®¬²»®©·¬¸¿²»²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´¹®±«°«½¸¿¬¸» Í¬»ª»²úÐ»®³¿²»²¬»Ý®»»µÉ¿¬»®¸»¼Ý±«²½·´¬±»»µ¿¹®¿²¬¬±º«²¼¿©»´´¬®¿·²»¼¿²¼«°»®ª·»¼ ¹®±«°±ºª±´«²¬»»®¬±½±²¼«½¬¬¸»©»»¼·²¹±²¿²±²¹±·²¹¾¿·ò Í»½¬·±²îòêòìô°¿¹»ç Â¼Æ¸¿¾·¬¿¬·³°®±ª»³»²¬©·´´«°°±®¬¬¸»É»¬»®²°±²¼¬«®¬´»øÛ³§³¿®³±®¿¬¿÷ôÍ¿²Ú®¿²½·½± ¼«µ§º±±¬»¼©±±¼®¿¬øÒ»±¬±³¿º«½·°»¿²²»½¬»²÷ô¾·¹¾®±©²¾¿¬øÛ°¬»·½«º«½«÷¿²¼Ç«³¿³§±¬· ¾¿¬øÓ§±¬·§«³¿²»²·÷°±°«´¿¬·±²¬¸¿¬¾®»»¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»½±®®·¼±®òÌ¸»¬®»¿³»²¸¿²½»³»²¬©·´´ °®±ª·¼»¾¿µ·²¹´±½¿¬·±²¿²¼·³°®±ª»¼º±®¿¹·²¹½±²¼·¬·±²º±®¬«®¬´»ò×²îððçô¬¿ººº±«²¼¿É»¬»®² °±²¼¬«®¬´»·²¬¸»½®»»µ½±®®·¼±®º±®¬¸»º·®¬¬·³»·²»ª»®¿´§»¿®òÌ¸»»¨°¿²¼»¼®»¬±®¿¬·±²°®±ª·¼»¼¾§ Ð¸¿»î©·´´¾»²»º·¬¬¸·ÃÈÁ ï Ó·´´»®ÖòÎòôÉ·»²ôÖòßòôØ±¾¾ÒòÌòô¿²¼Ì¸»±¾¿´¼ÜòÓòîððíò Ûºº»½¬±º¸«³¿²»¬¬´»³»²¬±²¾·®¼½±³³«²·¬·»·²´±©´¿²¼¿²¼®·°¿®·¿²¿®»¿ ±ºÝ±´±®¿¼±øËÍß÷òÛ½±´±¹·½¿´ß°°´·½¿¬·±²ô31¢0¡É3403¬34/+ î Í½¸´»·²¹»®ôÓòÜòôÓ¿²´»§ôÐòÒòôØ±´§±¿µôÓòîððè òÜ·¬·²¹«·¸·²¹¬®»±®¿½¬·²¹±²´¿²¼¾·®¼½±³³«²·¬·»·²¿²«®¾¿²·¦·²¹»²ª·®±²³»²¬ò Û½±´±¹§èçøè÷æîíðîîíïì î Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïï Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Ý±³³»²¬æ Ì¸»°»½·¿´¬¿¬«°»½·»²±¬»¼¿¾±ª»ô»°»½·¿´´§°±²¼¬«®¬´»ô©·´´²±¬²»½»¿®·´§¾»²»º·¬ ÷ º®±³¬¸»®»¬±®¿¬·±²»ºº±®¬·º«ºº·½·»²¬¬»®®»¬®·¿´¸¿¾·¬¿¬·²±¬³¿·²¬¿·²»¼ò×º¬¸»¬®¿·´·¿´·¹²»¼²»¿®¬¸» ½®»»µ¿»²ª··±²»¼¾§¬¸»»¿¬»®²¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»ôª»®§´·¬¬´»«²¼·¬«®¾»¼¬»®®»¬®·¿´¸¿¾·¬¿¬©·´´®»³¿·²ò Ë®¾¿²©¿¬»®©¿§«½¸¿Í¬»ª»²Ý®»»µ½¿²°®±ª·¼»¸¿¾·¬¿¬ª·¿¾´»º±®°±°«´¿¬·±²±º°±²¼¬«®¬´»¿²¼ ¸±©½¿»¬¸»³¬±¬¸»°«¾´·½ô¾«¬¾±¬¸¬¸»¿¯«¿¬·½¿²¼¬»®®»¬®·¿´¸¿¾·¬¿¬³«¬¾»³¿²¿¹»¼¿½½±®¼·²¹¬± í ¬¸»¾·±´±¹·½¿´®»¯«·®»³»²¬±º¬¸»°»½·»òÐ±²¼¬«®¬´»º®»¯«»²¬´§³¿µ»°®±´±²¹»¼«»±º¬»®®»¬®·¿´ ¸¿¾·¬¿¬º±®¾±¬¸²»¬·²¹¿²¼±ª»®©·²¬»®·²¹¿½¬·ª·¬·»å¬¸»¬«®¬´»³¿§¬®¿ª»´·²´¿²¼¿º¿®¿ëðð³»¬»® º®±³¬¸»©¿¬»®¾±¼§Ì¸»ª¿´«»±º¬¸»±´¼±®½¸¿®¼¿¬»®®»¬®·¿´¸¿¾·¬¿¬º±®°»½·»«½¸¿°±²¼¬«®¬´» 4 . ¸±«´¼²±¬¾»«²¼»®»¬·³¿¬»¼ò×º¬¸»¬®¿·´·¿´·¹²»¼¿´±²¹¬¸»©»¬»®²¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»¿²¼¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼·²±¬ ¼·µ»¼ô¬¸»±®½¸¿®¼¸¿¬¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´¬±¾»ª¿´«¿¾´»¬»®®»¬®·¿´¸¿¾·¬¿¬º±®°±²¼¬«®¬´»ò Í»½¬·±²îòêòìô°¿¹»ç É¸·¬»¬¿·´»¼Õ·¬»ôÎ»¼¸±«´¼»®»¼Ø¿©µô££ÅØ¿©µôß³»®·½¿²Õ»¬®»´ôÉ»¬»®²Í½®»»½¸Ñ©´ ¿²¼Þ¿®²Ñ©´¿®»¿³±²¹¬¸»°»½·»µ²±©²¬±²»¬¿´±²¹¬¸»½®»»µ·²Ý«°»®¬·²±òÌ¸»»®¿°¬±®¿´±²¹ ©·¬¸¼±¦»²±º³·¹®¿¬±®§¾·®¼¿²¼´±½¿´®»°¬·´»¿²¼¿³°¸·¾·¿²©·´´¾»²»º·¬º®±³¬¸»·³°®±ª»¼ÆÃÈÁ Ý±³³»²¬æ Ì¸»¼·¬¿²½»¬¸»¬®¿·´·°´¿½»¼º®±³¬¸»®·°¿®·¿²½±®®·¼±®½¿²¸¿ª»¿¹®»¿¬·³°¿½¬±²¬¸» ÷ ¯«¿´·¬§±º¸¿¾·¬¿¬º±®®¿°¬±®¿²¼±¬¸»®¾·®¼ò×²¿¬«¼§±º·¨·¬»ô¬¸®»»©·¬¸¿®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´¬®¿·´ ®«²²·²¹¿¼¶¿½»²¬¬±¿®·°¿®·¿²½±®®·¼±®¿²¼¬¸®»»©·¬¸²±¬®¿·´ô¬¸»²«³¾»®±º®¿°¬±®°»½·»©¿ ë ò×²¹®¿´¿²¼ô²»¬©»®»´»´·µ»´§¬±±½½«®²»¿®¬®¿·´ ½±²·¬»²¬´§¹®»¿¬»®·²¬¸»·¬»©·¬¸²±¬®¿·´ ¬¸¿²¿©¿§º®±³¬®¿·´ò×²¹®¿´¿²¼¿²¼º±®»¬ô²»¬«®ª·ª¿´·²½®»¿»¼©·¬¸·²½®»¿·²¹¼·¬¿²½»º®±³¿ ê ¬®¿·´òÌ¸»¦±²»±º·²º´«»²½»©¿¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§éë³»¬»®ô±®îìêº»»¬ôº®±³¿¬®¿·´º±®³±¬°»½·»ò Í»½¬·±²îòêòëô°¿¹»ïð Â¼Æ´·¬±º¬§°·½¿´°´¿²¬°»½·»¬±¾»«»¼º±®®»ª»¹»¬¿¬·±²¿²¼¸¿¾·¬¿¬»²¸¿²½»³»²¬¸¿¾»»² ¼»¬»®³·²»¼¾¿»¼±²»¨·¬·²¹²¿¬·ª»°´¿²¬º±«²¼¿´±²¹¬¸»½®»»µô¸·¬±®·½¿´²¿¬·ª»°´¿²¬°»½·» ®»½±®¼»¼¿´±²¹¬¸»½®»»µô¿²¼°»½·»±¾»®ª»¼·²·³·´¿®¬®·¾«¬¿®§½®»»µ©·¬¸·²¬¸»©¿¬»®¸»¼òÌ¸» °´¿²¬°»½·»¬±¾»«»¼º±®®»ª»¹»¬¿¬·±²¸¿ª»¾»»²º«®¬¸»®¾®±µ»²«°·²¬±¬¸®»»¸¿¾·¬¿¬¦±²»º±«²¼ ¿´±²¹¬¸»½®»»µø»»Ì¿¾´»îòêïôîòêîô¿²¼îòêíô±£_¡ÈÁ Ý±³³»²¬æ Ì¸»«¹¹»¬»¼°»½·»´·¬»¼¿´´±«²¼º·²»ô¾«¬¿²»¿®¿×½¿²®»³»³¾»®¬¸»§¿®»¿´®»¿¼§ ÷ °®»»²¬·²¬¸»Í¬»ª»²Ý®»»µÝ±®®·¼±®©·¬¸·²Ó½Ý´»´´¿²Î¿²½¸¿²¼ñ±®Þ´¿½µ¾»®®§Ú¿®³ò×¬©±«´¼¾» ¸»´°º«´·º¬¸·»½±²¼°¸¿»±º¬¸»®»¬±®¿¬·±²½±«´¼·²½´«¼»¿©»´´¿²·½»ª¿®·»¬§±º°»½·»©¸·½¸«»¼ í Í°·²µÐòÏòôÐ¿«´§ÙòÞòôÝ®¿§±²ÖòÖòôÍ¸¿ºº»®ØòÞò Í«®ª·ª¿´±º¬¸»©»¬»®²°±²¼¬«®¬´»øÛ³§³¿®³±®¿¬¿÷·²¿²«®¾¿²Ý¿´·º±®²·¿»²ª·®±²³»²¬ ò øîððí÷Þ·±´±¹·½¿´Ý±²»®ª¿¬·±² ôïïíøî÷ô°°òîëéîêé ì Î»»»ôÜòßò¿²¼Ø¿®¬©»´´ôØòÉòïççéò Ë»±ºÌ»®®»¬®·¿´Ø¿¾·¬¿¬¾§É»¬»®²Ð±²¼Ì«®¬´»ô±««Y««£æ×³°´·½¿¬·±²º±® Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬ò Ð®±½»»¼·²¹æÝ±²»®ª¿¬·±²ôÎ»¬±®¿¬·±²ô¿²¼Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬±ºÌ±®¬±·»¿²¼Ì«®¬´»òß²×²¬»®²¿¬·±²¿´Ý±²º»®»²½»ô°°òíëîíëé ¸»´¼ïççé¾§¬¸»Ò»©Ç±®µÌ«®¬´»¿²¼Ì±®¬±·»Í±½·»¬§ ë Ú´»¬½¸»®Ö®òôÎòÖòôÓ½Õ·²²»§ôÍòÌò¿²¼Þ±½µôÝòÛòïçççò Ûºº»½¬±º®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´¬®¿·´±²©·²¬»®·²¹¼·«®²¿´®¿°¬±®¿´±²¹®·°¿®·¿²½±®®·¼±®·²¿ Ý±´±®¿¼±¹®¿´¿²¼ò Ö±«®²¿´±ºÎ¿°¬±®Î»»¿®½¸ííøí÷æîííîíç ê Ó·´´»®ôÍòÙòôÕ²·¹¸¬ôÎòÔò¿²¼Ó·´´»®ôÝòÕòïççèò×²º´«»²½»±º®»½®»¿¬·±²¬®¿·´±²¾®»»¼·²¹¾·®¼½±³³«²·¬·»ò Û½±´±¹·½¿´ß°°´·½¿¬·±²èæïêîçò í Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïî Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ¬±¾»°®»»²¬·²¬¸»¿®»¿ô¾«¬²±´±²¹»®¿®»òÌ¸»ª¿´´»§®·°¿®·¿²¿®»¿«»¼¬±¾»ª»®§ôª»®§®·½¸·²°´¿²¬ ÷ÙÍÎÈØ °»½·»¿²¼¬¸»©·´¼´·º»©¸·½¸¼»°»²¼±²¬¸»³ò Ñ²½»¿¹¿·²ô¬¸¿²µ§±«±³«½¸º±®§±«®±²¹±·²¹®»¬±®¿¬·±²»ºº±®¬ò Í·²½»®»´§ô Ö±¿²²»Ó½Ú¿®´·² Ð®±¹®¿³Ü·®»½¬±®ôÍ¬»ª»²úÐ»®³¿²»²¬»Ý®»»µÉ¿¬»®¸»¼Ý±«²½·´øÍÐÝÉÝ÷ øÐ´»¿»²±¬»¬¸¿¬×·²½´«¼»³§¿ºº·´·¿¬·±²³»®»´§¬±·²º±®³¬¸»®»¿¼»®å¬¸»½±³³»²¬·²¬¸·´»¬¬»®®»º´»½¬ ³§±©²ª·»©±²´§¿²¼¿®»²±¬³»¿²¬¬±®»°®»»²¬¬¸±»±º¬¸»ÍÐÝÉÝ³»³¾»®¸·°ò÷ ì Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïí Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êö 21346 Rumford Dr. Cupertino CA 95014 August 18, 2011 City of Cupertino Department of Public works, Attn: Gail Seeds 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project, Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Dear Gail, I am pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the above referenced project and look forward to a successful restoration of this section of Stevens Creek for the purpose of creating a healthier, complex, and sustainable native ecosystem for aquatic and riparian woodland wildlife. I also look forward to affording residents access via a trail to the restored creek and historically significant orange grove. Please consider the following comments and questions regarding the project as presented in the IS/Mitigated Neg.Dec. Page 5, 2.6.1 I support a plan that would restrict access on the viewing ö footpath for creek observation to pedestrians. Some dog owners desire to use the waters of the creek for their dog’s exercise and recreation (personal communication). This would disturb aquatic and streambank wildlife, and is not legal during certain months when steelhead trout are migrating and spawning. There is no need for bicyclists to bring their bicycles on a short footpath. Bicycles can be left at the main trail while the people walk to the creek. Page 8, 2.6.4 It is stated that “Buffer distances will vary depending upon the ö location, and on the west bank along the orchard … may typically range between 10 and 25 feet. On the west bank along the orchard, it is estimated that the native plantings zone may typically extend roughly 30 to 40 feet Please explain the difference from the current channel centerline …” between “buffer distances” and “the native plantings zone” and how the two distance ranges stated differ. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïì Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Page 8, 2.6.4 “Cupertino will maintain the site after construction and plans ö Please explain to monitor the progress of the restoration for up to 5 years.” in more detail what the city plans to do to maintain and monitor the restoration, particularly the native plantings. Native plants need to be protected from invasive non-native plants indefinitely. Annual grasses quickly advance and can shade out and out-compete newly planted natives. Invasive vines (e.g. Cape Ivy, Himalayan Blackberry) and groundcovers (e.g. Vinca) exist in great quantity upstream from the project site (e.g. Deep Cliff golf course) and can be expected to recolonize the newly restored areas. A regular weeding program should be implemented to prevent the eventual disappearance of some of the native habitat restoration. The city’s track record for successfully minimizing the negative impacts of invasives in the SCCP Phase 1 project is mixed. Will the city be able to do a better job ö through Public Works employees, Parks and Recreation staff, contractors, and/or volunteers in protecting the new native plants A great deal of public ? funds are paying for hundreds if not thousands of native plants and it would be a shame if in ten years many of them are overrun by the invasive non- natives. Also, what will be the replacement policy for those plants that do ö not survive, as some degree of mortality is expected in a restoration project. Page 29, Trail Construction “The trail is expected to be typically 8 to 10 ö Please explain where the trail might become greater than 8 feet wide…)” feet wide and why. Since this trail is for low impact recreational purposes, particularly to observe and enjoy the peace and serenity of nature, and will not be heavily used for work or school commuting, the narrower dimension is more appropriate. Can we be assured that impervious concrete, “Asphalt would not be used.” ö or any other impervious surfacing, will not be used? Page 32, “In addition, an estimated 20 walnut trees in the orchard may be Dead and decaying tree limbs and trunks are removed as they are diseased.” an excellent food source for insect eating birds and other wildlife, and provide substrate and nutrients for hundreds if not thousands of organisms that provide a necessary function in ecosystems. Other than to assure public ö safety near the trail and buildings, is there another reason why these trees should be removed? If not, I propose that at least some of the infected walnut trees be retained and allowed to decay in place. Besides for providing an ecosystem function, dead and dying trees provide an educational Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïë Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ opportunity for children and adults to learn about the importance of these elements in the cycle of nutrients in ecosystems. Page 61 User Access and Dogs/Special-status Plants and Restoration “Adaptive Management. If it is determined that operational measures are not sufficiently minimizing impact to the native flora and fauna and restored habitats, the City may discontinue permitting dogs within the project area. If decreased steelhead survivorship or disturbance to other protected wildlife is determined to be a direct impact from visitor misuse, appropriate ö How exactly measures will be implemented … to avoid further impacts.” will such determinations be made? What survey protocols and by whom will such data be acquired to make the determinations that would trigger revised management policy? Are these the same methods that are used in Phase 1? How and where will the public be able to access findings regarding the impacts of users and dogs on the habitat restoration areas, on steelhead and other sensitive species populations? Page 66 Mitigation Measure BIO-7“ … all coast live oak trees removed ö from the project area would be replaced at a 3:1 ratio … using direct-seeded acorns …” Please explain the replacement policy of those acorns, seedlings, saplings or trees that fail to survive. How long will this policy be followed? As was the case for the Phase 1 CEQA documents, this Initial Study is a wealth of information about natural and cultural history and current resources associated with Stevens Creek and corridor. Thank you for considering and responding to my comments and questions regarding the project. Deborah Jamison Cupertino resident Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïê Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êõ õ õ õ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïé Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ õ ÙÍÎÈØ õ õ õ õ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïè Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ õÙÍÎÈØ õ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ïç Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îð Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îï Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îî Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îí Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îì Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îë Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îê Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ ùÍÏÏ×ÎÈð×ÈÈ×Êó Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îé Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïïÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» îè Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ B.Responses to Comments Letter A: Department of Transportation Comment A.1 : Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways such as Interstates 85 and 280, requires a transportation permit issued by the Department. To apply, a completed transportation permit application with the determined specific route(s) for the shipper to follow from origin to destination must be submitted to the address below. Response to Comment A.1 :Comment noted.The requirement for a transportation permit from the California Department of Transportation for oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways shall be included in the project specifications. Letter B: John Buenz Comment B.1 : In reviewingyour on lineplans for the trail alignment, I note that page 17shows an "western trail alignment zone"and page 18 shows an "eastern trail alignment zone", and the two are rather different as to their relationship to the orchard. The "western trail alignment zone" is much nearer to the Meadows property line (passing through the orchard) and our homes than the western version. Remembering that the City Council approved an alignment that appears as the "eastern trail alignment zone", I ask why are there two zones now being shown and apparently being considered? Response to Comment B.1 :The IS/MND presents andanalyzes the impacts of the “worst-case- scenario”for trail alignments. The zones show the eastern and western limits of there the trail may be aligned, and they reflect the City Council’s discussion ofthis topic at their meeting on April 5, 2011. The Council directed that the trail be located no farther west than the “second row of orchard trees” (on the west side of the Stocklmeir parcel) and no farther east than along the riparian [vegetation] zone that is on the west bank of the creek,asnoted on Page 6 of the IS/MND.Therefore, the trail will not be located farther east than the eastern alignment shown on the first page of Figure 2-3 of the IS/MND or farther west than the western alignment shown on the second page of Figure 2-3 of the IS/MND. Trail alignmentalternativeswill be designed somewhere between these two scenarios presented and the alignments will be brought forward for review. Comment B.2 : Also, the eastern zone is much nearer the creek and would afford considerably more interaction with the creek than the western zone. The western zone passes through the orchard it's self and would be a boring/non creek alignment.Thisis to be [a] creek trail. Response to Comment B.2 : Comment noted. Letter C: Rhoda Fry Comment C.1: First of all, I really like the color choice of the hard trail at Scenic Circle –it was a superior choice tothe hard trail through McClellan Ranch. I realize that this is not a CEQA comment, however, I dohope that you’ll take it into consideration with your plans. Responseto Comment C.1: Comment noted. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Page 29 Response to Public Comments Comment C.2: As I have commented on previous portions of the project: the documents fail to include the connection of this trail to the greater trail system the National De Anza Trail http://www.nps.gov/juba/index.htm and this significant omission to consider future connections and their impacts is not consistent with CEQA. Response to Comment C.2 : The National De Anza Trail as listed in the website noted in this comment is shown as a zone which crosses through Cupertino in the project area. The IS/MND notes Bautista de Anza aHowever, at this time there are no provisions to establish the existing Stevens Creek Trail as part of the De Anza Trail. The Project under consideration is the construction of a 1,300 foot extension of a creek corridor trail and is not proposed to be recognized as a part of the National De Anza Trail system. Comment C.3: Another issue that has not been studied is additional programming at the Stocklmeir property. We know that there is insufficient parking at Stevens Creek right now that spills over into neighborhoods and I believe that the additional parking proposed will not be sufficient to handle Stocklmeir programming. Response to Comment C.3 : The Stocklmeir Task Force last discussed the concept . Since then, plans for the site have been on hold and the task force has not yet pursued developing a more detailed vision. The legacy farm is thus not part of the proposed project. further CEQA environmental review will occur. The IS/MND for the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project cannot address unknown uses and therefore cannot evaluate the impacts of those uses. Comment C.4: I would like to see the City look into re-striping McClellan Ranch parking lot as well to see if more parking can be added there. An early goal of this project was to have the parking on the outside on major roads and have the inside be parkland. I do applaud the planners Response to Comment C.4 : Comment noted. Comment C.5 : We know that programming changes that appear to be innocuous can result in significant cumulative impacts. For example, previously the driveway to Blackberry Farm Picnic Grounds had essentially operated as a one-way driveway. People would tend to stay the day and drive in. Most AM traffic was incoming and most PM traffic was outgoing. A very positive change of use has been increasing Cupertino resident use of our parklands. Unfortunately, it has given rise to unaddressed predicted circumstances. Namely, people come and go during the day creating 2-way traffic and also come by foot and by bicycle leading to safety issues. I am deeply concerned that the City has added morning programming during the summer at Blackberry Farm, which encourages more 2-way short trips on the driveway and hazardous intersection (described by the previous head of public works as a choke point) and exactly at the time when residents are dog walking. This is a recipe for an accident to happen. Response to Comment C.5: Comment noted. Comment C.6 : Intro Page 3: Although a picky point, Phase I has not been completed. One major area is the wetland habitat which was destroyed during construction and restoration of the water September 12, 2011 TRA Environmental Sciences Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íð Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ system. I understand that this has been planned for, however, it is inaccurate to state that the project is complete. Response to Comment C.6: Comment noted.The original Stevens Creek Corridor Park Master Plan and Restoration Plan Project (2006) did addressthe intent to rehabilitate the old water system at Blackberry Farm. This portion of the 2006 project is currently being pursued independently asa separate project. CommentC.7 : I am also hopeful that decaying buildings at McClellan Ranch shall be maintained as expected. Response to Comment C.7: Comment noted. CommentC.8 : I am impressed by the new head of public works and his dedication and desire to protect trees. Response to Comment C.8: Comment noted. CommentC.9 : Pg 16: Looks like there is an area where there will not be restoration near the bridge, that’s too bad. Response to Comment C.9: Comment noted. CommentC.10 : I had been told at a Stevens Creek and Permanente Watershed meeting that the bridge at Stevens Creek is weak and might not withstand a flood condition. I hope that the City of Cupertino can look into that before we have a flood situation and resident homes could be damaged. Response to Comment C.10: The existing bridges(at Blackberry Farm and the bridge on Stevens Creek Boulevard) are not being modified or changed by this project and are not part of the scope. CommentC.11 : Page 37, environmental checklist –hard to understand how a connection to a National Trail would result only in 13 additional weekday vehicle trips and 34 weekend vehicle trips –would suggest a second look at this. Even with that number of 34, it seems that the additional parking proposed would be inadequate. Response to Comment C.11: Please see response to comment C.2, above. CommentC.12 : Page 59: I don’t get why we don’t know definitively “may still use the roost tree” where the bats are roosting these days. Seems that we should know that before construction begins. Response to Comment C.12: While surveys could be done now to determine whether or not trees are currently being used for roosting habitat, roost locations could change between now and the actual start of construction. Roosts which are in use by bats can change. Therefore, the project includes conductingpre-construction surveys for bat roosts prior to the start of construction to identify whether active roostsexistat that time. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íï Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ CommentC.13 : Page 62: regarding sudden oak death. I hope the city is looking into current exposures to sudden oak death within the corridor and dealing with them appropriately. Response to Comment C.13: Comment noted.The City is not aware of any sudden oak death (SOD) infections in the city or along Cupertino’s portion of Stevens Creek. If SOD is detected, the City will take appropriate measures to deal with the issue. CommentC.14 : General Comment –I’m confident that the new leadership in the City will ensure that the BMPs are used and applied for this phase of the project. Response to Comment C.14: Comment noted. CommentC.15 : I’m looking forward to the bus turnout on Stevens Creek. The one at McClellan Ranch has been a welcome addition and I even got to use it on my son’s field trip. Really nice to have a safe drop-off point for children. Response to Comment C.15: Comment noted. CommentC.16 : Page C-3, AGAIN it is inappropriate under CEQA to not consider impacts (parking and other) from the future “living history center.” Response to Comment C.16: Please see response to comment C.3, above. Comment C.17 : Appendix D: It is unfortunate that the tree list provided is merely an estimate and that protected trees are already scheduled for removal. What will the process be if more trees are scheduled for removal? How will that affect the CEQA process? Response to Comment C.17: The IS/MND evaluates an estimatedworst-case-scenarioof tree removal.It is not expected that more trees will be removed that would cause an impact with more severity than is discussed in the IS/MND.If additional trees need to be removed, the removals andthe installation of replacement trees would have to follow the requirements of the City’s municipal code as well as applicable requirements of the permitting and regulatory agencies involved in the project, and per section 3.4 of the IS/MND. Comment Letter D: Mindy Grant Comment D.1: Please continue the trail through the property to Stevens Creek Blvd.! It would be great if we walkers could go all the way through. The proposed extension is not a very long distance, so we really hope you will approve it. Response to Comment D.1: Comment noted. Comment Letter E: Joanne McFarlin The author includes several footnotes which are not included here in the Responses to Comments text,however they are shown on the copy of the comment letter contained in Section A of this document. Comment E.1 :This sounds great, both for casual trail users to be able to step off the trail for a bit of peace, quiet, and wildlife viewing as well as for educational groups to have creek access. In the spirit of setting aside some part of the restored riparian area as relatively undisturbed Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íî Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ habitat, however, I hope you put this footpath near the trail bridge where there will already be a considerable human presence. Response to Comment E.1 : Comment noted. Comment E.2: Many people are not aware that the human disturbance associated with public access tocreek areas affects habitat quality. In particular, impacts from the use of recreational trails near riparianareas are greatly underestimated by the public. Because of their greatly varying distances from theriparian corridor, the proposed eastern and western trail alignments referred to above would have vastly different environmental impacts. The difference in impact these two differing alignments wouldhave on the quality of habitat west of the creek is especially important given that the east side has already been heavily compromised by the golf course. A large body of research details the impacts which recreational trails have on the surrounding habitat. For instance, one study showed that even when bird communities in riparian areas have been heavily impacted by urbanization in surrounding lands, the presence of hikers, joggers and bicyclers along a recreational trail have a significant further impact, especially on species that nest close to the ground or forage low for insects or seeds1. In many cases, disturbance from human activity is the most important factor affecting the number of bird species, surpassing even the effects from habitat loss due to development. Response to Comment E.2 : Comment noted. Comment E.3 : The reference to “buffer” in the document is somewhat confusing. It seems to just refer to the zone of proposed terrestrial restoration adjacent to the creek. I think the buffer can more functionally be defined as the total area between the creek and the pedestrian/bike trail alignment. This would include the area within the proposed terrestrial habitat restoration and the orchard east of the trail –all habitat that would be relatively undisturbed by the activity associated with trail usage. The farther the trail is from the creek, the higher the quality of the habitat of land adjacent to the creek even in the orchard area. Response to Comment E.3: Comment noted. Please also see response to comment F.2, below. Comment E.4: Judging from the many nonnative invasive plants which have reestablished themselves withsome vigor within the Blackberry Farm Phase 1 restoration area, Ihope the City of Cupertino makesplans to deal with the problem in Phase 2. Admittedly, this is quite a challenge. Removing invasive plantswithout damaging the surrounding native plants is time consuming and expensive. Plus, I am under theimpression that many park maintenance workers are not sure which are the native and which are theinvasive plants. Recruiting casual volunteers to do the weeding is likely to do more harm than good. Ibelieve a good alternative would be for the City to partner with an environmental group such as theStevens & Permanente Creeks Watershed Council to seek a grant to fund a welltrained and supervisedgroup of volunteers to conduct the weeding on an ongoing basis. Response to Comment E.4: Comment noted. Comment E.5: The special status species noted above, especially pond turtles, will not necessarily benefit from the restoration effort if sufficient terrestrial habitat is not maintained. If the trail is aligned near the creek as envisioned by the eastern alternative, very little undisturbed Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íí Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ terrestrial habitat will remain. Urban waterways such as Stevens Creek can provide habitat viable for populations of pond turtles and showcase them to the public, but both the aquatic and terrestrial habitat must be managed according to the biological requirements of the species. Pond turtles frequently make prolonged use of terrestrial habitat for both nesting and overwintering activities; the turtles may travel inland as far as 500 meters from the water body. The value of the old orchardas terrestrial habitat for species such as pond turtles should not be underestimated. If the trail is aligned along the western alternative and the orchard is not disked, the orchard has the potential to be valuable terrestrial habitat for pond turtles. Response to Comment E.5: Comment noted. Comment E.6: The distance the trail is placed from the riparian corridor can have a great impact on the quality of habitat for raptors and other birds. In a study of six sites, three with a recreational trail running adjacent to a riparian corridor and three with no trail, the number of raptor species was consistently greater in the sites with no trail. In grasslands, nests were less likely to occur near trails than away from trails. In grasslands and forests, nest survival increased with increasing distance from a trail. The zone of influence was approximately 75 meters, or 246 feet, from a trail for most species. Response to Comment E.6: Comment noted. Comment E.7: The suggested species listed all sound fine, but as near as I can remember they are already present in the Stevens Creek Corridor within McClellan Ranch and/or Blackberry Farm. It would be helpful if this second phase of the restoration could include as well a nice variety of species which usedtobe present in the area, but no longer are.The valley riparian areas used to be very, very rich in plant species and the wildlife which depend on them. Response to Comment E.7: Comment noted. Letter F:Deborah Jamison Comment F.1: Page 5, 2.6.1 I support a plan that would restrict access on the viewing footpath for creek observation to pedestrians. Some dog owners desire to use the waters of the creek for their dog’s exercise and recreation (personal communication). This would disturb aquatic and streambank wildlife, and is not legal during certain months when steelhead trout are migrating and spawning. There is no need for bicyclists to bring their bicycles on a short footpath. Bicycles can be left at the main trail while the people walk to the creek. Response to Comment F.1: Comment noted. Comment F.2: Page 8, 2.6.4 Itis stated that “Buffer distances will vary depending upon the location, and on the west bank along the orchard … may typically range between 10 and 25 feet. On the west bank along the orchard, it is estimated that the native plantings zone may typically extend roughly 30 to 40 feet from the current channel centerline …” Please explain the difference between “buffer distances” and “the native plantings zone” and how the two distance ranges stated differ. Response to Comment F.2: Neither the amount of buffer nor the layout of the native planting is precisely designed at this point, therefore, the wording for “buffer distances” and the “native planting zone” were descriptive rather than technical. The buffer distancenotedis measured Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íì Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ roughly from the top of bank while the native planting zone is from the channel centerline. Therefore, they are different figures. Comment F.3: Page 8, 2.6.4 “Cupertino will maintain the site after construction and plans to monitor the progress of the restoration for up to 5 years.” Please explain in more detail what the city plans to do to maintain and monitor the restoration, particularly the native plantings. Response to Comment F.3: As with the Phase 1 restoration project, the Phase 2 project will be maintainedby the City. Maintenance is currently providedby staff and with some tasks performed by contract rangers; supervised or trained volunteers may be added. The Phase 2 projectis expected to bemonitored for the first 5 years,likely in a similar manner to the Phase 1 project.Restoration monitoring reportsfor the Phase 1 projectlist the findings of monitoring, and offer a way to use adaptive management as the restoration matures. The methodology includesthe following: “The growth of the riparian and upland habitat plantings is being monitored in Years 1, 3 and 5 for comparison to the as-built habitat conditions in place upon the re-opening of the site to the public in July 2009. The habitat is evaluated using two quantitative performance criteria and two qualitative assessments. Initially, the quantitative habitat evaluation will be determinedsolely by the percent survival of the plantings. As the plantings mature, the habitat will beevaluated based upon percent survival and percent cover. The recruitment of native plantspecies to the site is tallied and recorded by species as a qualitative assessment of habitatrestoration. The establishment of nonnative invasive species is also noted during the datacollection undertaken for this monitoring program”(Chartrand and Sokale2010). The City expects to do similar monitoring for the Phase 2 project. Comment F.4: Native plants need to be protected from invasive non-native plants indefinitely. Annual grasses quickly advance and can shade out and out-compete newly planted natives. Invasive vines (e.g. Cape Ivy, Himalayan Blackberry) and groundcovers (e.g. Vinca) exist in great quantity upstream from the project site (e.g. Deep Cliff golf course) and can be expected to recolonize the newly restored areas. A regular weeding program should be implemented to prevent the eventual disappearance of some of the native habitat restoration. TheCity’s track record for successfully minimizing the negative impacts of invasives in the SCCP Phase 1 project is mixed. Will the city be able to do a better job through Public Works employees, Parks and Recreation staff, contractors, and/or volunteers in protecting the new native plants? Response to Comment F.4: Comment noted. Comment F.5: A great deal of public funds are paying for hundreds if not thousands of native plants and it would be a shame if in ten years many of them are overrun by the invasive non- natives. Also, what will be the replacement policy for those plants that do not survive, as some degree of mortality is expected in a restoration project. Response to Comment F.5: The City is maintaining the site withanemphasis on removing the most noxious non-native plants. The City’soriginal planting concept was to overplant as a way to offset the likely loss of a percentage of the new plantings. This overplanting, combined with site maintenance, would result in the increasing the overall goals of improved habitat areaand values. The plants were carefully sited, and most are thriving. In addition,more plants were Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íë Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ originally contract grownthan needed for the restoration planting plan. The additional plants were planted at the site in 2008-2009to hasten canopy spread and further offset mortality. Monitored plants must exhibit a 75% survival by Year 3 and a 60% survival by Year 5 to meet the percent survival benchmarks. The first year monitoring results(Chartrand and Sokale 2009) found an 88% overall survival rate for all of the restoration plantings, including the “extra” additional plants installed. When the percent success was scaled to compensate for the “overplanting”, the success rate was 109%. Both riparian and upland plantings were found to be thriving and the plantings had performed well. Further quantitative monitoring to be performed this year will provide more information on planting establishment that can be incorporated into the planning for Phase 2. Comment F.6: Page 29, Trail Construction “The trail is expected to be typically 8 to 10 feet wide…)” Please explain where the trail might become greater than 8 feet wide and why. Since this trail is for low impact recreational purposes, particularly to observe and enjoy the peace and serenity of nature, and will not be heavily used for work or school commuting, the narrower dimension is more appropriate. Response to Comment F.6: For the most part, the trail is expected tobe approximately 8 feet wide. However, it maybe widened toabout10 feet to accommodate nodes such as driveways, intersections with other paved areas, or areas with safety or capacity considerations. Comment F.7: “Asphalt would not be used.” Can we be assured that impervious concrete, or any other impervious surfacing, will not be used? Response to Comment F.7: The material for the trail surface has not yet been selected. Impervious or semi-pervious surfacing materialsmay be used,including stabilized crushed or decomposed granitefor example.However, the surfacingwill not be asphalt. Comment F.8: Page 32, “In addition, an estimated 20 walnut trees in the orchard may be removed as they are diseased.” Dead and decaying tree limbs and trunks are an excellent food source for insect eating birds and other wildlife, and provide substrate and nutrients for hundreds if not thousands of organisms that provide a necessary function in ecosystems. Other than to assure public safety near the trail and buildings, is there another reason why these trees should be removed? If not, I propose that at least some of the infected walnut trees be retained and allowed to decay in place. Besides for providing an ecosystem function, dead and dying trees provide an educational opportunity for children and adults to learn about theimportance of these elements in the cycle of nutrients in ecosystems. Response to Comment F.8: Dead and dying trees can present a safety hazard to park users. University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor Bill Coates, a specialist in tree fruit and nut crops, reviewed the Stocklmeir orchard with City staff in May 2008 and recommended the removal of all dead and dying walnut trees. The comment regarding the ecosystem and educational value of dead and dying trees is noted. Comment F.9: Page61 User Access and Dogs/Special-status Plants and Restoration “Adaptive Management. If it is determined that operational measures are not sufficiently minimizing impact to the native flora and fauna and restored habitats, the City may discontinue permitting dogs within the project area. If decreased steelhead survivorship or disturbance to other protected wildlife is determined to be a direct impact from visitor misuse, appropriate measures will be Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íê Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ implemented … to avoid further impacts.” How exactly will such determinations be made? What survey protocols and by whom will such data be acquired to make the determinations that would trigger revised management policy? Are these the same methods that are used in Phase 1? How and where will the public be able to access findings regarding the impacts of users and dogs on the habitat restoration areas, on steelhead and other sensitive species populations? Response to Comment F.9: Quantitative monitoring for steelhead was not done by the City, as it has not been required for the City to do so by any regulatory agency. However, the Santa Clara Valley Water District(SCVWD)last monitoredsteelhead in this reach of Stevens Creek in September 2010and found that the highest numbers of the largest steelhead were found in the recentlyrestored (Phase 1) reach of Stevens Creek, per preliminary results presented on October 25, 2010 at a meeting of the Fishery and Aquatic Habitat Collaborative Effort Consensus Committee.SCVWD has biologist staff and resourcestoconduct steelhead evaluations, rather than the City. As stated in response to comment F.2, the City has prepared quantitative vegetative monitoring and the public can access these findings by contacting the City. Comment F.10: Page 66 Mitigation Measure BIO-7 “ … all coast live oak trees removed from the project area would be replaced at a 3:1 ratio … using direct-seeded acorns …” Please explain the replacement policy of those acorns, seedlings, saplings or trees that fail to survive. How long will this policy be followed? Response to Comment F.10: It is expected that the vegetation mortality parameters for these acorns would be the same as listed in the Stevens Creek Corridor Phase 1 project, namely “The total of all plants monitored must exhibit a 75% survival by Year 3 and a 60% survival by Year 5 to meet the established percent survival benchmarks” (City of Cupertino 2009). Comment Letter G: Barbara Stocklmeir Comment G.1: While enhancing wildlife environments is laudable, I am againstthe new backwater habitat channel cut plan and think flooding issues, school impacts, and golf balls are inadequately addressed in the MND. Response to Comment G.1: Comment noted. Comment G.2: The stretch of Stevens Creek between Phase 1 and Stevens Creek Boulevard has not been changed by nature or humans as far back as our maps inform, very different than Phase 1’s banks and creek channel. In 1885, the west side’s orchard lands are owned by JDW(JD Williams). In 1900, Mathias Stocklmeier, age 39, Louis, Adele and Alphonse’s father, is purchasing goods from the Cupertino General Store. On their way out in the 1990s, his great grandchildren respectfully left the mortars and pestles that were discovered on the land. The Cupertino Historical Society hay have these valuable artifacts. The east side is the low side, the dug up side, the natural flood side, the sewer side and has a sag pond, a common earthquake fault feature. The west side’s land has not really been deeply disturbed. Farming, even with modern equipment, does not cut deeply into the earth and no one farms the banks. There is some cement work. In its day, the orchard fed thousands of hungry people oranges, a tree compatible with oaks. The trees prevent erosion. The creek floodshere before housing starts immediately downstream. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íé Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Response to Comment G.2: Comment noted. Comment G.3: The MND does not adequately address flooding of the new backwater channel, nor the cost associated with erosion and replanting, nor the impact to the east bank when the water rushes out of the channel back into the creek. During downpours, upstream log jams and other obstacles cause odd water movement. Consequently, the west side, or up hill side from the creek has flooded twice in the 1990s, both times up to the small stone wall surrounding the Stocklmeir driveway. These flooding events have provided waterfor the orchard and prevented flooding of the neighbor’s house and City and sewer line across the creek by Blackberry Farm Golf Ball Club. The neighbor’s home flooded in the 1960s. The creek can divert either way. With the installation of an expensive backwater habitat channel, dug deeply into virgin creek land and potentially covering Indian artifacts, the City of Cupertino will have to know the ditch and its plants may be eroded and washed away. Expensive to maintain and monitor. Response to Comment G.3: Page 92 of the IS/MND states that “The existing drainage pattern will not be altered from the current configuration as a result of creek restoration and/or trail construction. The slight alterations of the bank along Stevens Creek, including the removalof failing bank stabilization, will beneficially affect the area as channel capacity will increase from an estimated 700 to 800 cubic feet per second (cfs)to an anticipated 1,500 cfs.The project, however, will not change the broader floodplain that defines the valley floor, and therefore the existing drainage pattern of the overall area would not be altered.” Regarding potential discovery of Native American artifacts, as stated on page 72 of the IS/MND, “Even though no significant archaeological resources were recovered in the presence/absence testing for CA-SCl-715, the proposed project could reveal as yet unknown prehistoric or historic archaeological resources.More specifically, mitigation measures CUL-1 to CUL-5 are in place to protect buried cultural resourcesand are cited in section 3.5 of the IS/MND. Comment G.4: The School Impact Section thinks there will be no impact on schools. “The proposed project is the construction of a trail and restoration of this reach of Stevens Creek. The project would not result in increased number of students served by local schools.” Conversely and in reality, students walk, board, bike, and drive to Monta Vista High school from every direction surrounding this new trail. The trail is in the middle of the City. Thetrail will be inundated with student travelers. Not addressing school children’s needs and safety while coddling the fish make the fish channel that much more unpalatable. Response to Comment G.4: The question in the CEQA Guidelinesregarding schools and school impacts is meant to determine if the project would result in an increase in student population and require the construction of new or largerschoolfacilities to accommodate an increased number of students.In addition, although the project would expand a recreational resource that could attract residents and students to the trail, this is not the type of development that is expected to generate new residential development. Therefore, the project would not increase the student population in the City of Cupertino, and it would have no impact on school facilities. Comment G.5: Northeast from the trail’s entrance at the Stocklmeir driveway, elementary school children from the Phar Lap area travel to and from Stevens Creek School. These students arenot bused. They will be impacted by increased trail users entering and exiting the park on Stevens Creek Boulevard. Additionally, expect the Blackberry Farm Golf Course’s parking lot to Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» íè Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ become a safe student drop off site for Monta Vista High School Students. Healthy breakfast at the Blue Pheasant? Healthy snack? Orange? Response to Comment G.5: Comment noted. Comment G.6: The MND does not consider golf ball issues. Every day, golf balls are hit into the creek and the orchard, not so much into the orchard today because of its overgrown banks, but that is changing. One must consider golf ball pick up on the orchard side. In the future, it will be easier, safer and less costly to pick up golf balls on a flat orchard floor, as people do now for fun, as opposed to “disturbing” the backwater channel. Temptation will not be deterred by “mitigating” signs and policies. Expect trampling, even by careful maintenance workers fishing the balls out of the new backwater channel. Response to Comment G.6: The City will consider golf course proximity and golf ball issues as the design of the trail proceeds.The project description on Page 5 in the IS/MND does include installationon the east bank trail alignmentof a “protective fence…between the trail and the golf course along this stretch, as needed, to protect trail users from errant golf balls.” Comment G.7: The MND does not address the downhill 12% grade on Stevens Creek Boulevard approaching the 90 degree turn into the entrance of the Stocklmeir driveway. As I stated at the January 18, 2011 City Council meeting, planning a trail head 90 degree turn at the bottom of a 12% grade hill is dangerous. While the MND acknowledges imperfections, it minimizes the safety issues. Imagine any combination of dogs on leashes, boarders, strollers, walkers, runners, tricycles, and bicycles entering the trail while cars, trucks, county buses and school buses whiz by at the posted 35 means 40 MPH limit. Has anyone biked down Stevens Creek Boulevard and made the turn? Your paper pathsare dangerous and until you bike it and report back, you have not done your homework. Response to Comment G.7: Comment noted. The City will consider appropriate measures for safety at this location during the design. Comment G.8: A Project Manager’s job is to ask for additional wants in addition to a project’s needs. The backwater channel is a want, not a need. No one should be surprised by modifications and cuts, especially today. Please remove the backwater habitat channel plan for the aforementioned reasons of flooding issues, errant golf balls, construction expense and creation of an ongoing “off limits” policed area requiring high maintenance. Response to Comment G.8: Comment noted. Comment G.9: Attachments: Images of America Early Cupertino by Mary Lou Lyon page 37’s 1885 map, Mathias Stocklmeier biography, History of Santa Clara County 1992 1900/1901 Cupertino Ca. General Store Book. M. Stocklmier Nov. 1990. Ebay find. Umbrella and Fan Patent 2 Apr. 1895 M Stocklmeier of Los Gatos. Photos of flooded Stocklmeir Orchard in the 1990s by Barbara Stocklmeir. MND Page 89 flood data MND Page 109 schools Response to CommentG.9: Attachments are noted. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Page 39 Response to Public Comments Comments H : Comments made during the City of Cupertino Environmental Review Committee meeting held on August 18, 2011 Comment H.1 (Councilmember Barry Chang) : Hazardous materials testing should include mercury and selenium. Response to Comment H.1 : Comment noted. Comment H.2 : A resident spoke in favor of the project and asked about the proposed new crosswalk, and asked if it would include flashers. Response to Comment H.2 : Comment noted. The new crosswalk will have advance flashing warning lights as noted on page 6 of the IS/MND. References: Chartrand and Sokale. 2009. Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Plan: Geomorphic and Vegetation Monitoring Results 1st Year Post Construction, Blackberry Farm, Cupertino, California. Prepared for City of Cupertino Department of Public Works. December. Chartrand and Sokale. 2010. Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Plan: Geomorphic and Vegetation Monitoring Results 2nd Year Post Construction, Blackberry Farm, Cupertino, California. Prepared for City of Cupertino Department of Public Works. December. Cupertino, City of. Undated. Monitoring Program: Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Plan. National Park Service. 2011. Juan Bautista de Anza, National Historic Trail. http://www.solideas.com/DeAnza/TrailGuide/Santa_Clara/index.html. Last accessed August 26. C.Errata and Text Changes to the IS/MND In response to the comments received on the IS/MND or additional information, the following changes are made to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration text. New, added text is shown in underlined text and deleted text is shown as strikeout text. Page 70: Second paragraph under “Findings”: A plaque at McClellan Ranch about 0.5 mile south of the project site states, “Lt. Colonel Juan Bautista de Anza and party crossed this area…”. According to the National Parks Service website, the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail is shown as a “Historic Trail Corridor” which crosses through Cupertino in the project area (National Park Service 2011). The trail is not proposed to be recognized as a part of the National De Anza Trail system. No other Hispanic era ranch dwellings or features have been identified in or adjacent to the project area as a result of research conducted for this project. Appendix D: Estimated Tree Removals for Stevens Creek Corridor Phase 2 Project: Two additional trees (that do not meet the size requirement (which is 31 inches circumference measured 4 ½ feet above natural grade) for a Protected Tree under the City’s Tree Protection September 12, 2011 TRA Environmental Sciences Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î Ð®±¶»½¬ Ð¿¹» ìð Î»°±²» ¬± Ð«¾´·½ Ý±³³»²¬ Ordinance, City Ordinance No. 07-2003)near the location of aproposedretaining wall adjacent to the Blackberry Farm Golf Course and Blue Pheasant parking lot may need to be root pruned or removed to accommodate the new retaining wall. If removed these may be replaced in kindat their present locationif space allows.If not,they will be replaced elsewhere within the project footprint. Í»°¬»³¾»® ïîô îðïï ÌÎß Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ Í½·»²½» Attachment C Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 1 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan èÔÓÉïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÛÎØê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕìÐÛÎïïêìÔÛÉÚ××ÎÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍù÷ëû õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 2 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Impact BIO-1: Mitigation Measure BIO-1a:Implementation: Monitoring: Initials: ______ óÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÎìÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛ ÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÇÌÐÛÎØéÇÊÆ×ÃÛÎØùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎìÔÛÉ×ûÙÈÓÍÎÉöÍÇÊëÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØéÇÊÆ×ÃÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÊ×ØÐ×ÕÕ×ØÖÊÍÕØÛÃÉÍÊÖ×Å×ÊÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÉÈÛÊÈÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÈÍÉÇÚÏÓÈÛÐ×ÈÈ×Ê Date: ________ ùêðöå×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×ÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏÍÎ×ØÛÃÈÓÏ×ÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊÛÎØÛÐÐÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÖÉÇÊÆ×Ã åìèÛÎØ ÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÖÍÊùêðöåìèÛÎØéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÙÊ×ÅÏ×ÏÚ×ÊÉÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÈÍÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈèÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÚ ÛÎØÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎÃÚÇÊÊÍÅÉÊÍÙÑÉÛÎØÅÍÍØÌÓÐ×ÉÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÚ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÊ×ÅÈÍ Timing: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÔÇÏÛÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉØÓÉÈÇÊÚ×ØÚÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÉÓÕÎÛÉÔ××ÈÖÍÊ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈ×ØÖÍÊùêðöåìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈóÖùêðöÊ×Ù×ÓÌÈÍÖùêðö ØÇÊÓÎÕ ÓÉØ×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ø×ÐÛÃ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×åìèÛÎØ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÉ çéöåéÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÅÈÍÌÊÍÙ××ØóÖÅÍÍØÊÛÈÈÊÛÓÎÓÎÕ ÅÍÇÐØÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØÛÚÍÆ× ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔÓÉÉÇÊÆ×ÃåìèÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÉÓÕÎÓÎÉÔ××È åìèùêðöÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÈÍÛ ÈÔ×ùøöõÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÅÈÍÔ×ÐØÚÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Ð×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð ÌÊÍÙ××ØÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊÙ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ óÖÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎùêðöÓÉ ÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉÍÊÈÍ Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÉÇÉÌ×ÎØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃ ×ÎÖÍÊÙ×ÉÌ××Ø ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÎÍÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÛÎØ ÐÓÏÓÈÛÎØÌÛÊÑ×Ø çéöåéÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ×ØÍÎÔÍÅÈÍÌÊÍÙ××ØóÖ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÙÔ×ÙÑ ÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎåìèÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈ ÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÉÇÉÌ×ÎØ×ØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÎÍÈÓÖÃ ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃèÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÍÊ ËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÈÍÛÉÉÓÉÈÓÎÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×Ê ÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÉóÎÈÔ× ÌÛÉÈùøöõÔÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÉÖÍÊÈÔ× Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÎØÈÇÊÈÐ×ÉÉÈÛÈÓÎÕÈÔÛÈÓÖÛÈÇÊÈÐ×ÓÉ Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ØÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÓÖ ÓÈÓÉÏÍÆÓÎÕÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÓÎÅÔÓÙÔÓÈÅÛÉ Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÍÊÓÖÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÓÉÍÙÙÇÌÃÓÎÕÈÔ×ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÖÍÊÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÍÊÚÛÉÑÓÎÕøÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÖ ÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×Ø×È×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÓÈÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÍÊ ËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÅÓÐÐÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÊ×ÅÉ óÖÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÓÉÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÅÓÐÐÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÛÎØ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 3 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation ÛÐ×ÊÈÅÍÊÑÙÊ×ÅÉÈÍØ×ÐÛÃÅÍÊÑÓÖÓÈÓÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛÍÊÚ×ÕÓÎÉÈÍÏÍÆ×ÈÍÅÛÊØÍÊÓÎÈÍÈÔ× ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛóÖÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÈÍÚ×ÈÊÛÆ×ÐÓÎÕÖÊÍÏ ÇÌÐÛÎØÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÈÍÛÎ×ÛÊÚÃÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÓÈ×ÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐ Ù×ÛÉ×ÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÔÛÉÈÊÛÆ×Ð×ØÛÉÛÖ×ØÓÉÈÛÎÙ× ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×èÔ×ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐ ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÖÊÍÏÛØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÓÈ ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÅÛÎØ×ÊÚÛÙÑÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÛÊ×ÛóÖÈÔ× ÈÇÊÈÐ×ÓÉÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÎØÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÈÍÚ×ÍÙÙÇÌÃÓÎÕÈÔ× ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈÖÍÊÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÉÇÙÔÛÉÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÚÛÉÑÓÎÕÍÊÖÍÊÛÕÓÎÕÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÊ ÓÈÉÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÈÓÆ×ÉÅÓÐÐÙÍÎÈÛÙÈùøöõÖÍÊ ÕÇÓØÛÎÙ× óÖÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍ ØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÉÇÉÌ×ÎØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÛÎØÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐ ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃÎÍÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃèÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÔÛÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÍÊËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÈÍÛÉÉÓÉÈÓÎ ÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÌÊÍÌ×ÊÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÛÎÓÏÛÐÉùøöõÔÛÉÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÙÙ×ÌÈ×ØÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÖÍÊÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ× ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÎéÛÎöÊÛÎÙÓÉÙÍØÇÉÑÃÖÍÍÈ×ØÅÍÍØÊÛÈ ÔÍÇÉ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×ØÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÍÖÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÃÛÎØ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÛèÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÍÊÑÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÊÍÇÈ×ØÈÍÛÆÍÓØ ÈÔ×ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÔÍÇÉ×ÚÃÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ Ö××È ÚóÖÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÙÛÎÎÍÈÚ×Ê×ÊÍÇÈ×ØÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ Ö××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÓÈÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ÊÍÇÈ×ØÛÉ ÖÛÊÛÅÛÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈÙÐÍÉ×ÊÈÔÛÎÖ××ÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ× éÛÖ×ÈÃÛÎØ ÍÊÉÓÐÈÖ×ÎÙÓÎÕÖÍÊÔÍÇÉ×É ØÍÅÎÉÐÍÌ×ÅÓÐÐÚ××Ê×ÙÈ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÛÐÐ ÔÍÇÉ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎ Ö××ÈÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÈÍÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉØÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÙóÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈÏÇÉÈÕÍØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 4 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÖ××ÈÍÖÛÔÍÇÉ×ùøöõ ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÍÎÉÇÐÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÅÍ ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÍÌÈÓÍÎÉ ÓóÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÓÎÛÙÈÓÆ×É××Ñ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÖÊÍÏùøöõÈÍØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ÈÔ× ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÎØÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÉÈÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÚÃÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÛÎÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ×íÎ× ÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ×ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÚÇÓÐÈÖÍÊ ×Æ×ÊÃÍÎ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÓÎÛÙÈÓÆ×ÔÍÇÉ× ÓÓóÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉÛÙÈÓÆ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÉÍÇÕÔÈÖÊÍÏùøöõÈÍÈÊÛÌ ÈÔ×ÍÙÙÇÌÛÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ× ØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛ Î×ÅÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉ ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ØÔÍÇÉ×ÛÎØ Ê×Ð×ÛÉ×ÈÔ×ÍÙÙÇÌÛÎÈÓÎÈÍÈÔ×Î×Å ÛÊÈÓÖÓÙÓÛÐÔÍÇÉ×èÔ×Î×ÅÔÍÇÉ×ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÉÙÐÍÉ×ÈÍÓÈÉÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐ ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÛÎØÛÉÖÛÊÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈÛÉÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÈÍ Ú×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉóÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÓÉÈÍÚ×ÏÍÆ×Ø ØÍÅÎÉÐÍÌ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈ ×ÄÈÊÛÌÊ×ÙÛÇÈÓÍÎÉÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÛÑ×Î ÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÌÐÃÅÍÍØÚÛÊÊÓ×ÊÈÍÉÈÍÌ ÖÛÐÐÓÎÕ ÉÐÓØÓÎÕÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÖÊÍÏÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ×Î×ÅÔÍÇÉ×ôÍÇÉ×ÉÉÔÍÇÐØÍÎÐÃ Ú×ÏÍÆ×ØÓÎÈÔ××ÛÊÐÃÏÍÊÎÓÎÕØÇÊÓÎÕ ÈÔ×ÎÍÎÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎíÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃóÖÈÊÛÌÌÓÎÕÔÛÉ ÍÙÙÇÊÊ×ØÖÍÊÈÔÊ××ÙÍÎÉ×ÙÇÈÓÆ×ÎÓÕÔÈÉ ÛÎØÎÍÅÍÍØÊÛÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ø ÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ØÓÉÏÛÎÈÐ×ØÛÎØÛ Î×ÅÔÍÇÉ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Mitigation Measure BIO-1b ÷ÏÌÐÍÃ××÷ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÕÊÛÏûÎ×ÏÌÐÍÃ×××ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÔÛÐÐ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 5 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation Ú×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉèÔ×ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÍÖÛÚÊÓ×Ö ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÚÃÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×ÛÚÐ×ÓÎ Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÓÉÈ×ØÛÎØÉÈÛÈ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÉÈÛÈÇÉÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÚÓÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØÐ×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÓÆ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍ×ÄÌÐÛÓÎ ÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÉÈÍÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÉèÔ× ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÛØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖùêðöåìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ Î××ØÉÛÎ×ÄÌÐÛÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈÇÉÍÖùêðö åìèÛÎØÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐÐÛÅÉÛÎØÛÐÓÉÈÍÖÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÚ×ÓÎÕ ÈÛÑ×ÎÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍùêðöåìèÛÎØ ÅÍÍØÊÛÈØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉùÊ×ÅÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÓÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×ØÈÔÛÈÓÖÛùêðöÓÉÖÍÇÎØÓÈÓÉÈÍÚ×Ð×ÖÈ ÛÐÍÎ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÊ×ÏÛÎùÓÈÃÛÎØÈÔ× çéöåéÏÇÉÈÚ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃðÓÑ×ÅÓÉ×ÓÖ ÛåìèÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈÎ×ÉÈÓÉÖÍÇÎØÓÈÓÉÈÍÚ×Ð×ÖÈ ÛÐÍÎ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÍÊ×ÏÛÎùÓÈÃÛÎØùøöõ ÏÇÉÈÚ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓ×ØÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÐÃ Mitigation Measure BIO-1c: éÌ××ØðÓÏÓÈ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈØÊÓÆ×ÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÏÓÐ×ÉÌ×Ê ÔÍÇÊÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛóÖÛÎÃåìèùêðöÍÊ ÅÍÍØÊÛÈÛÊ×É××ÎÓÎÈÔ×ÌÛÈÔÍÖÛÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÔ× Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÔÛÐÐÉÈÍÌÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ×ÛÎÓÏÛÐÓÉÍÇÈÍÖÈÔ× ÌÛÈÔìÛÊÑ×ØÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÓÈ× ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÔ×ÙÑ×ØÇÎØ×ÊÎ×ÛÈÔÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÃÛÊ× ÏÍÆ×ØÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÎÍåìèùêðöÍÊÅÍÍØÊÛÈ ÛÊ×ÍÎÈÔ×ÕÊÍÇÎØÚ×ÐÍÅÈÔ×Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× Impact BIO-2:Mitigation Measure BIO-2:Implementation: Monitoring: Initials: ______ ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÛÑ×ÍÖú×ÉÈïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÙÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊØÇ×ÈÍìÊÛÙÈÓÙ×ÉúïìÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊïÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ÙÊ××ÑÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕÛÎØØ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÛÎØËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ Date: ________ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉéÈÊ×ÛÏïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ìÊÍÕÊÛÏÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÛÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ× ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÇÉ×ØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Øçéûù÷Ì×ÊÏÓÈ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ØÇÊÓÎÕÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÈÍÛÎØîíûû ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉ ÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØØÇ×ÈÍØ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÓÎÕÍÊöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×É ÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð Timing: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍ É×ØÓÏ×ÎÈÖÓÐÐ×ØÊÇÎÍÖÖ×ÎÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×úÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 6 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation ÍÖÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚÛÎÑÐÛÃÚÛÙÑÛÎØ ÍÊ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎíÌÓÎÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØ ÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÉ××ûÌÌ×ÎØÓÄûÖÍÊÛÐÉÍÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø úïìÉ èÔ×É×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÏÍØÓÖÓ×ØØ×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎ ÈÔ×ÍÇÈÙÍÏ×ÍÖÈÔ×îíûûöÓÉÔ×ÊÓ×ÉúÓÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ íÌÓÎÓÍÎ ÷ÄÙ×ÊÌÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ× éùæåøúïì ôÛÎØÚÍÍÑ åë ÈÓØÛÐéÓÈ×É åëûÆÍÓØ÷ÊÍÉÓÍÎåÔ×Îê×ÉÈÍÊÓÎÕ öÐÍÅÉ åë÷ÊÍÉÓÍÎÛÎØé×ØÓÏ×ÎÈùÍÎÈÊÍÐ ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É åë ìÇÏÌ õ×Î×ÊÛÈÍÊé×ÈíÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× åëéÍÓÐéÈÍÙÑÌÓÐ×É åë ùÍÎÙÊ×È×çÉ×î×ÛÊåÛÈ×ÊÅÛÃÉ åëõÊÍÇÎØÅÛÈ×ÊïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ úóïÓÎÓÏÓÂ×éÈÊ×ÛÏûÙÙ×ÉÉóÏÌÛÙÈÉ úó éÛÐÆÛÕ×îÛÈÓÆ×ûËÇÛÈÓÙæ×ÊÈ×ÚÊÛÈ×É ÖÊÍÏø×ÅÛÈ×Ê×ØùÔÛÎÎ×ÐÉ úó ùÍÎØÇÙÈóÎùÔÛÎÎ×ÐåÍÊÑøÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× øÊÃé×ÛÉÍÎ úóê×ÏÍÆ×è×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÃöÓÐÐÉÛÉ ûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× åëéÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ØùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× ôï æ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈöÇ×ÐÓÎÕ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 7 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation ôïæ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÛÎØ÷ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈ ïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ïÓÕÊÛÈÓÎÕÉÈ××ÐÔ×ÛØÅÍÇÐØÛÐÉÍÚ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×Ø ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕúïìÉÛÎØðÓÏÓÈ×Ø íÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕì×ÊÓÍØÉðíìÉÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××Ñ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÈÔ×ÏÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎ ê×ÉÈÍÊ×ØÙÊ××ÑÚÛÎÑÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÌÐÛÎÈ×ØÛÎØ ÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ×ØÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÉÍÖÚÛÎÑ×ÊÍÉÓÍÎ ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÊÛÓÎÉÛÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Impact BIO-3Mitigation Measure BIO-3Implementation:Monitoring: Initials: ______ èÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÊæ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÍÖÉÔÊÇÚÉÛÎØÈÊ××ÉÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×ÛÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ëÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ê ÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÙÍÇÐØÓÏÌÛÙÈÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØÈÍÈÛÑ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÈÍÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ× Date: ________ ÚÓÊØÉÓÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉ×ÛÉÍÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃÈÍûÇÕÇÉÈ ÓÖÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÈÍÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÎØ ÍÊ ÛÆÍÓØÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÚÓÊØÉóÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÛÆÍÓØÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÍÇÈÉÓØ× Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊÛÌÈÍÊÎ×ÉÈÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÎÍÎÍÖÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ÈÔ×ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÇÊÆ×ÃÍÖÛÐÐÍÎÉ×ÛÉÍÎóÖÎÍÈ ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ ÌÔÛÉ×ÍÖÈÔ× ÉÓÈ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÊÛÌÈÍÊÎ×ÉÈÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÚÓÊØÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÚÃÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ÷Æ×ÊÃÛÈÈ×ÏÌÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐ Ð×Æ×Ð ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÏÛØ×ÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÊ××ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÊÛÌÈÍÊ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ Î×ÉÈÉÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕ ÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø óÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÉÇÎÛÆÍÓØÛÚÐ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× ÅÓÈÔÓÎÖÓÆ×ØÛÃÉ Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐ ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÙÍÎØÇÙÈÛÉÇÊÆ×ÃÖÍÊÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÛÎØ ÍÖÎ×ÉÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ ÍÈÔ×ÊÚÓÊØÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÖÓÆ×ØÛÃÉÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ× èÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ ÉÈÛÊÈÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉóÖÛÙÈÓÆ× ÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×Û Î×ÉÈÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÌÊ×É×ÎÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ï×ÏÍÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÙÛÎÈÛÑ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÛÉÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ×ØóÖ ÈÔ×Ê×ÉÇÐÈÉÍÖÈÔ× ÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎÖÓÆ×ØÛÃÉ×ÐÛÌÉ×Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ× Î×ÉÈÉÇÊÆ×ÃóÖ ÓÎÓÈÓÛÐÎ×ÉÈÉ×ÛÊÙÔÛÎØÈÔ×Ú×ÕÓÎÎÓÎÕÍÖ Î×ÉÈÉÛÊ×ÖÍÇÎØ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊÎ×ÉÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ê ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØóÖÛÎÃÛÙÈÓÆ× ÛÎØ Î×ÉÈÉÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÔÛÐÐØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÈÍ ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÅÍÇÐØ Ú××ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÈÔ×Î×ÉÈùøöõ ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 8 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÛÙÙ×ÌÈÉÛ ÖÍÍÈÊÛØÓÇÉÚÇÖÖ×ÊÚÇÖÖ×ÊÓÉ ÛÊÍÇÎØÌÛÉÉ×ÊÓÎ×ÛÎØÎÍÎÌÛÉÉ×ÊÓÎ×ÐÛÎØÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÇÎÈÓÐ ÚÓÊØÎ×ÉÈÉÛÎØÇÌÈÍÛ ÖÍÍÈÊÛØÓÇÉÖÍÊÙÔÓÙÑÉÔÛÆ× ÊÛÌÈÍÊÉÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÔÛÆ×ÖÐ×ØÕ×Ø ÖÐ×ÄÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÈÍÊ×ØÇÙ×ÍÊ×ÄÌÛÎØÈÔ×ÚÇÖÖ×Ê Ø×Ì×ÎØÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÙÓÊÙÇÏÉÈÛÎÙ×É Impact BIO-4Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Implementation: Monitoring: Initials: ______ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ×ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÛÉëÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×Ê ÐÍÉÉÍÊÛÚÛÎØÍÎÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÚÛÈÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÛÎØÛÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÃÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÈÍÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ× Date: ________ ÊÍÍÉÈÍÊÙÍÐÍÎÃÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÎ×ÛÊÛ ÛìÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÚÓÕ Timing: ìÊÓÍÊÈÍ ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÊÍÍÉÈ ÚÊÍÅÎÚÛÈÉÙÍÇÐØÏÍÆ×ÈÔ×ÓÊÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÙÍÐÍÎÃÍÊ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÊ××ÓÖÌÊ×É×ÎÈ ØÛÃÊÍÍÉÈÈÍÛÈÊ××ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÎØ ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ ÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖ Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÖÚÛÈÉÙÍÇÐØÖÍÊÏÛÎ×Å ÚÛÈÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃ ÊÍÍÉÈÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ð×Æ×Ð É×ÛÉÍÎóÖÎÍÈ ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÖÍÊÊÍÍÉÈÓÎÕÚÛÈÉÉÔÛÐÐÛÐÉÍÚ×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×Ø Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÐÛÊÕ×ÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐ èÔ×ÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎØÇÙÈ×ØÚÃÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×Ø ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈ ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÐÓÉÈ×Ø Úè×ÏÌÍÊÛÐÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÚÍÆ×ÛÊ× ÚÇÖÖ×ÊÂÍÎ×ÉùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÚÇÖÖ×ÊÂÍÎ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÛÊÍÇÎØÛÙÈÓÆ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÙÍÐÍÎÓ×ÉÍÊÛ úÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÎÍÎÚÊ××ØÓÎÕÚÛÈÊÍÍÉÈÈÍÛÆÍÓØ ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÎÕÅÍÊÑ ØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉèÔ×ÚÇÖÖ×ÊØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÅÓÐÐÚ× ÅÍÇÐØÉÇÚÏÓÈÛ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÓÎÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔùøöõÛÎØÅÓÐÐÚ× Ð×ÈÈ×ÊÈÍùøöõ Ø×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈÇÌÍÎÈÔ×ÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÊÍÍÉÈÈÃÌ×ÛÎØÈÔ× ÛÎØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÎÛÈÇÊ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ× ÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÍÖ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔÓÉÚÇÖÖ×Ê ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÍÊ ØÓÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÏÏ×ÎÙ×ÍÎÐÃÛÖÈ×ÊÃÍÇÎÕÛÊ× ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÆÍÐÛÎÈÖÐÃÓÎÕÛÖÈ×ÊòÇÐÃ ÛÎØ×ÎØÚ×ÖÍÊ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÛÑ×Î ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÙÍÐÍÎÓ×ÉÖÍÊÏÇÎÐ×ÉÉÍÈÔ×ÊÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ× ÛÎØÛÉ ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ× ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×ÛÎÃ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÙÙ×ÌÈÛÚÐ× ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕ ÈÍùøöõÖÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÉÌ×ÙÓ×ÉÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÊÍÍÉÈÉ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØ ùøöõÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÏÛÈ×ÊÎÓÈÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎÈÍÍÙÙÇÊ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÉ ÖÊÍÏïÛÊÙÔÈÍûÇÕÇÉÈ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 9 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation Impact BIO-5:Mitigation Measure BIO-5Implementation:Monitoring: Initials: ______ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎèÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÈÔ×ÉÌÊ×ÛØùÓÈÃ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÈÍÍÖéÇØØ×ÎíÛÑø×ÛÈÔÖÊÍÏÉÍÓÐÛÎØÌÐÛÎÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÙÛÊÊÃéÇØØ×ÎíÛÑø×ÛÈÔÓÎÖ×ÙÈ×ØÛØÛÌÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛíÛÑïÍÊÈÛÐÓÈÃèÛÉÑø×ÌÈ Date: ________ ÉÍÓÐÖÊÍÏÍÈÔ×ÊÉÓÈ×ÉÓÎÈÍÈÔ×öÍÊÙ× Timing øÇÊÓÎÕ éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ùÍÎØÇÙÈÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ØÊÃÉ×ÛÉÍÎ ÈÔ×ÇÎÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÔÍÉÈ ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØ ÓÖÖ×ÛÉÓÚÐ×ÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×Å×ÈÉÍÓÐÏÇØÛÎØ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÈÍÍÊÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÉÓÈ×ÉÔÛÐÐ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÌÐÛÎÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛØÔ×ÊÓÎÕÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×É Ú×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×Ø ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÚÍÍÈÉ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ùÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉÔÛÐÐÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛÎØ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÊÊÓÆÓÎÕÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ÖÊÍÏÓÎÖ×ÙÈ×ØÉÍÓÐÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÖÊÍÏÛÊ×ÛÉÅÔ×Ê×éíø×ÄÓÉÈÉÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ× ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð ÈÔÛÈÎÍÔÍÉÈÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÓÉÚ×ÓÎÕÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈ×Ø ÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ùÐ×ÛÎÏÇØÖÊÍÏÉÔÍ×ÉÚÍÍÈÉÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×É ÛÎØÔ×ÛÆÃ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÛÊÊÓÆÓÎÕÖÊÍÏéíø ÛÊ×ÛÉÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÊÊÓÆÛÐÛÈÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× Impact BIO-6:Mitigation Measure BIO-6: Implementation: Monitoring: Initials: ______ èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÊÛÓÐìÊÓÍÊÈÍÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖùÓÈÃ ÏÛÃÛÖÖ×ÙÈÈÔ×ÊÍÍÈÂÍÎ×ÉÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÙ×ÊÈÓÖÓ×ØÚÃùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÓÖÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ××ÓÈÔ×ÊÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐéÍÙÓ×ÈÃÍÖûÊÚÍÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊ×ø×ÌÈ Date: ________ ØÊÓÌÐÓÎ×ÍÖÛÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××óéûÍÊÈÔ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖùÍÎÉÇÐÈÓÎÕ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕ ûÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÉûéùûÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉ óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ÈÊÛÓÐØ×ÉÓÕÎ ÖÍÊÈÊ××ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÅÍÇÐØÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎèÔ×ÛÊÚÍÊÓÉÈÅÍÇÐØ ÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ÇÉ×ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃªÉéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎøÇÊÓÎÕ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÛÊéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÚÃÈÔ×åÛÈ×Êê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ×ÖÍÊéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛùÍÇÎÈÃ ÍÊèÊ××ÉÛÎØø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÚÃî×ÐØÛïÛÈÔ×ÎÃÛÎØ òÛÏ×ÉùÐÛÊÑÍÊÛÙÍÏÚÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×É×ÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÈÍÊÍÍÈÂÍÎ×ÉÍÖÎÛÈÓÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 10 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation Impact BIO-7:Mitigation Measure BIO-7:Implementation: Monitoring: Initials: ______ èÊ××ÈÊÓÏÏÓÎÕÍÊèÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕùÓÈÃ Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÙÍÇÐØÆÓÍÐÛÈ×ùÓÈÃÍÖÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×ØÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÛÎØùøöõÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÎÍÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÅÍÇÐØÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÅÍÇÐØÛÌÌÐÃÖÍÊø×ÌÈÈÍÍÆ×ÊÉ×× Date: ________ Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÍÚÈÛÓÎÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊùÓÈÃ ÛèÍÉÛÈÓÉÖÃÈÔ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖùøöõÛÐÐ ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÅÍÇÐØÉÔÛÐÐÑ××Ì ÙÍÛÉÈÐÓÆ×ÍÛÑÈÊ××ÉÊ×ÏÍÆ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÊ×Û óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Ê×ÏÍÆ×ÈÊ××ÉÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈÛ ÊÛÈÓÍ ÈÊ××ÉÌÐÛÎÈ×Ø Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÖÓÐ× ÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØèÔ×É×ÈÊ××ÉÛÊ×ÈÍÚ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉÈÍÛ Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÊ××ÑÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Timing: Ð×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð ÉÓÈ×íÛÑÈÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÇÉÓÎÕØÓÊ×ÙÈ ûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× É××Ø×ØÛÙÍÊÎÉÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×éÈ×Æ×ÎÉùÊ××Ñ Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× åÛÈ×ÊÉÔ×ØÖÊÍÏÛÉÙÐÍÉ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÛÉ ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÍÊÈÊ×× ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌÊÓÍÊÈÍ ÚóÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÔ×ÊÓÈÛÕ×ÍÊÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×ØÈÊ××ÉèÊ××ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÈÍÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÈ ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍûÐÐÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÊÛÈÓÍÉÛÉ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÛÌÛÊÈÍÖ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÈÊ××Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐÌ×ÊÏÓÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×ØÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÙìÐÛÎÈÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊðÛÎØçÉ×Î×ÛÊ éÈÊ×ÛÏÉéùæåêìù ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÕÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÐÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕÎ×ÛÊÎÛÈÇÊÛÐÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÇÙÔÛÉ©çÉ×ÍÖðÍÙÛÐÐÃîÛÈÓÆ×éÌ×ÙÓ×É¨ÛÎØ©çÉ× ÍÖíÊÎÛÏ×ÎÈÛÐÍÊîÍÎÎÛÈÓÆ×ðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕ¨ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 11 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact CUL-1, CUL-2, CUL-3, Mitigation Measure CUL-1Implementation: Monitoring: Initials: ______ ìÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÍÎùÓÈÃ CUL-4 and CUL-5: ÷Æ×ÎÈÔÍÇÕÔ ÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÕÊÍÇÎØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÓÎÕÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔ×ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÎÍÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÎØÇÙÈÛÈÛÓÐÕÛÈ×Ï××ÈÓÎÕø×ÌÈø×ÌÈ Date: ________ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÅ×Ê×Ê×ÙÍÆ×Ê×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÈÍÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÐÐÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÎ×ÐÍÖÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ× ÛÚÉ×ÎÙ×È×ÉÈÓÎÕÖÍÊùûÖÍÊ×ÄÌÍÉÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÛÎØÈÍ Timing: øÇÊÓÎÕÛ éùÐÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÚÇÊÓ×ØÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÙÍÇÐØÊ×Æ×ÛÐÛÉÃ×ÈÇÎÑÎÍÅÎì×ÊÉÍÎÎ×ÐÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏ×ØÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÙ×ØÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈ ÖÓ×ÐØÏ××ÈÓÎÕÅÓÈÔ ÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÅÓÐÐÚ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×ØÇÌÍÎÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÊÉÇÉÌ×ÙÈ×Ø ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉ ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÖÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÓÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÛÊ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Mitigation Measures CUL-2ImplementationMonitoringInitials: ______ çÌÍÎØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÍÖùÓÈÃ ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÚÇÊÓ×ØÌÊ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÎØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ óÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÅÓÐÐ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐîÛÈÓÆ×ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎø×ÌÈø×ÌÈ Ú×Ê×ØÇÙ×ØÈÍÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎDate: ________ ÉÑ×Ð×ÈÛÐÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎ Ö××ÈÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÎØ Timing øÇÊÓÎÕ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×ÐÅÓÈÔÈÔ× ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÔÛÐÈ×ØÛÎØÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍªÉìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÈÔ×É×ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎ ïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓ×Ø Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É èÔ×ùÓÈÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÊ×ÈÛÓÎÛËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×Ø ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÈÍÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÛÎØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÖÓÎØ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÕÓÎÛÕÛÓÎÇÎÈÓÐÈÔ× ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÍÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈ ÔÛÉÚ××ÎÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÈÍ×ÄÛÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉÛÉÉ×ÉÉÈÔ×ÓÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÖÖ×Ê ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐÉÖÍÊÛÎÃÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ×ÄÌÐÍÊÛÈÍÊÃÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É Ø××Ï×ØÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ÛÎØ ÍÊÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛØÆ×ÊÉ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÛÎÃ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÊÇÎÓËÇ× ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×Ú××Î×ÄÌÍÉ×Ø óÖÈÔ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×ÊÃÓÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÍÚ×ÛÇÎÓËÇ× ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÛÎØÓÖ ÛÆÍÓØÛÎÙ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÓÉÎÍÈÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÈÔ× ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÉÔÛÐÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÈÔ×ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÍÖ ÈÔ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÎØÉ ÛÎØÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÓÏÌÛÙÈÉèÔ×ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÌÐÛÎÉÔÛÐÐ Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 12 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation Ú×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÈÔ××ÄÈÊÛÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ ÎÍÎÊ×ØÇÎØÛÎÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐØÛÈÛÈÍÛØØÊ×ÉÉ ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÊ×É×ÛÊÙÔÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈïÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉÔÛÐÐÓÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÓÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØèÔ×ÅÍÊÑÉÔÛÐÐÚ× Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÛÎØÉÔÛÐÐÊ×ÉÇÐÈÓÎ ÛØ×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÈ×ÙÔÎÓÙÛÐÊ×ÌÍÊÈÈÔÛÈÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ÖÓÐ×ØÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×ÏîÍÊÈÔÅ×ÉÈóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎù×ÎÈ×Êùéç êÍÔÎ×ÊÈìÛÊÑùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÔ×ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ× ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓÎØÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÙ×ÇÎÈÓÐ ÈÊ×ÛÈÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÚ××ÎÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø óÖÔÇÏÛÎÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÛÊ×ØÓÉÙÍÆ×Ê×ØÈÔ×ÃÉÔÛÐÐÚ× ÔÛÎØÐ×ØÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔéÈÛÈ×ÐÛÅÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×ÎÍÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÈÃï×ØÓÙÛÐ ÷ÄÛÏÓÎ×Ê ùÍÊÍÎ×Ê Mitigation Measure CUL-3ImplementationMonitoringInitials: ______ ûÐÐ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎùÓÈÃ ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÔÛÐÐÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÖÍÊÉÈÍÌÅÍÊÑÓÎÈÔ×ÆÓÙÓÎÓÈÃÍÖÛÖÓÎØÓÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÍÖø×ÌÈø×ÌÈ Date: ________ ×ÄÌÍÉÇÊ×ÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÛÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É Timing óÎÙÐÇØ× ØÇÊÓÎÕÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÓÎìÐÛÎÉÛÎØ óÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÉÔÛÐÐéÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ Ê×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ÈÔ×Î××ØÈÍÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÎÃÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÚÃÈÔ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛÕ×ÎÙÃóÎ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ É×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÎÃÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÈÔÛÈÔÛÉÈÔ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÍÊ ÕÊÍÇÎØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÓÎÕÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ Mitigation Measure CUL-4ImplementationMonitoringInitials: ______ ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐùÓÈÃ ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÍÎÛÉÌÍÈÙÔ×ÙÑÓÎÕÚÛÉÓÉÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÇÎØ×ÊÈÛÑ×ÎØÇÊÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ø×ÌÈø×ÌÈ Date: ________ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛ ÖÍÍÈÚÇÖÖ×Ê Timing øÇÊÓÎÕ ÂÍÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÍÖùûéùÐ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ûÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÓÎÙÐÇØ× Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 ProjectPage 13 Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan ImpactMitigation MeasureImplementation Monitoring Verified and TimingResponsibilityImplementation ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÅÚÛÙÑÅÛÈ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÚÊÓØÕ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÚÇÈÏ×ÎÈÉÍÊÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ×ÛÊÈÔÅÍÊÑÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉùûéùÐ éÌÍÈÙÔ×ÙÑÓÎÕ ÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ØÍÎ×ÛÈ ÈÔ×ÍÎÉ×ÈÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÍÎÙ× ÛÕÛÓÎØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ Mitigation Measure CUL-5:ImplementationMonitoringInitials: ______ ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐùÓÈÃ ÏÍÎÓÈÍÊÓÎÕÍÖÉÇÚÉÇÊÖÛÙ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÐÐÚ×ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÍÎÛÎÍÎÙÛÐÐÚÛÉÓÉÖÍÊÛÊ×ÛÉÍÇÈÉÓØ×ÍÖø×ÌÈø×ÌÈ Date: ________ ÈÔ×Ê×ÙÍÊØ×ØÚÍÇÎØÛÊÃÍÖùûéùÐÛÎØÈÔ× Timing øÇÊÓÎÕ ÖÍÍÈÚÇÖÖ×ÊÂÍÎ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ HAZARDS Impact HAZ-1Mitigation Measure HAZ-1ImplementationMonitoringInitials: ______ ïÛÒÍÊØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÉÍÓÐÈ×ÉÈÓÎÕùÓÈÃ ÍÖÉÍÓÐÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÓÈ×ÅÍÇÐØÖÍÊÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Ê×ÉÓØÇ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÏÛÒÍÊÉÍÓÐØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ùÓÈÃìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉ ÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÛÊ×ÉÇÐÈÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅÓÐÐÍÙÙÇÊÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖ×ÄÙÛÆÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÙÊ××Ñø×ÌÈø×ÌÈ Date: ________ èÔÓÉØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ×ÙÍÇÐØÇÎÙÍÆ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎóÖÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×ÉÛÊ×Ø×È×ÙÈ×ØÖÍÐÐÍÅÈÔ× Timing øÇÊÓÎÕ Ì×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Ê×ÉÓØÇ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÉÍÓÐÓÖÓÈÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÙÍÎÈÛÏÓÎÛÈ×ØÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÔÛÎØÐÓÎÕÛÎØ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ×ÄÓÉÈÉÅÔÓÙÔÅÍÇÐØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃØÓÉÌÍÉÛÐÌÊÍÈÍÙÍÐÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎØØÇÊÓÎÕÛÎÃÉÍÓÐ Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ÙÛÇÉ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍÈ×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÛÎØØÓÉÈÇÊÚÛÎÙ× ÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×É óÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ÅÓÐÐÊ×ØÇÙ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÈÍ È×ÊÊ×ÉÈÊÓÛÐÛÎØÛËÇÛÈÓÙÉÌ×ÙÓ×É ÖÊÍÏÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÌ×ÉÈÓÙÓØ×Ê×ÉÓØÇ×ÈÍ ÛÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐ×Æ×Ð Attachment D Ý±³³«²·¬§ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ Ý«°»®¬·²±ô Ýß çëðïì øìðè÷ éééóííðè ßÐÎÑÊÛÜ Ó×ÒËÌÛÍ ÑÚ ÌØÛ ÍÐÛÝ×ßÔ ÓÛÛÌ×ÒÙ ÑÚ ÌØÛ ÛÒÊ×ÎÑÒÓÛÒÌßÔ ÎÛÊ×ÛÉ ÝÑÓÓ×ÌÌÛÛ ØÛÔÜ ÑÒ ß«¹«¬ ïèô îðïï Ý±³³·¬¬»» Ó»³¾»®æÜ¿ª·¼ Õ²¿°° ß¿®¬· Í¸®·ª¿¬¿ª¿ Ì·³³ Þ±®¼»² É·²²·» Ô»» Þ¿®®§ Ý¸¿²¹ ø¿®®·ª»¼ ¿¬ çæìð÷ Ý±³³·¬¬»» Ó»³¾»® ¿¾»²¬æ ²±²» Í¬¿ºº °®»»²¬æ Ù¿·´ Í»»¼ Í¬¿ºº ¿¾»²¬æ Ò±²» ß«¹«¬ ìô îðïï ßÐÐÎÑÊßÔ ÑÚ Ó×ÒËÌÛÍæ ßÝÌ×ÑÒæ ß°°®±ª¿´ ±º ³·²«¬» º®±³ ß«¹«¬ ìô îðïï ÓÑÌ×ÑÒæ Ü¿ª·¼ Õ²¿°° ÍÛÝÑÒÜæ Ì·³³ Þ±®¼»² ßÞÍÌß×Òæ ²±²» ÊÑÌÛæ ìóð ÑÎßÔ ÝÑÓÓËÒ×ÝßÌ×ÑÒÍ øÎ»»®ª»¼ º±® °»®±² ©·¸·²¹ ¬± ¿¼¼®» ¬¸» Ý±³³·¬¬»» ±² ·«» ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» ²±¬ ¿´®»¿¼§ ·²½´«¼»¼ ·² ¬¸» ®»¹«´¿® Ñ®¼»® ±º Þ«·²»÷ ß ®»·¼»²¬ô Ö»²²·º»® Ù®·ºº·²ô °±µ» ¿¹¿·²¬ ¬¸» ½¸¿²¹» ¬± ¬¸» Îï Ñ®¼·²¿²½» ®»½»²¬´§ ¿°°®±ª»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ý·¬§ Ý±«²½·´ò Í¸» º»´¬ ¬¸» ª±¬» ¬± ³¿µ» ¬¸» ½¸¿²¹» ©¿ ®«¸»¼ ©·¬¸±«¬ »²±«¹¸ ½±²·¼»®¿¬·±² ¾»·²¹ ¹·ª»² ¬± ¬¸» ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ©¸·½¸ ¸¿ª» ¾»»² ¿²²»¨»¼ ·²¬± ¬¸» Ý·¬§ò Ì¸» ®»·¼»²¬ ·² ¬¸±» ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ «»¼ ¬± ¸¿ª» »´»½¬»¼ ®»°®»»²¬¿¬·±² º®±³ ¬¸» ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ¬± ³»»¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Í«°»®ª·±®ô ²±© ¬¸» Ý·¬§ Ý±«²½·´ · ³¿¼» ±º ¿¬ó´¿®¹» »´»½¬»¼ °»®±² ©¸± ©·´´ ²±¬ ¸¿ª» ¿ ª»¬»¼ ·²¬»®»¬»¼ ·² ¬¸»» «²·¯«» ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ò Í¸» ¸±°» ³±®» ¬¸±«¹¸¬ · °«¬ ·²¬± ¿² «°½±³·²¹ô ·³·´¿®ô ¿¹»²¼¿ ·¬»³ ½¿´´»¼ ¬¸» Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ð»®³·¬ Ð®±½» ¬®»¿³´·²·²¹ °®±¶»½¬ò ÒÛÉ ×ÌÛÓÍæ ïòß°°´·½¿¬·±² Ò±òæ Ð®±¶»½¬ çïíì øÛßóîðïïóïï÷ ß°°´·½¿²¬æ Ý·¬§ ±º Ý«°»®¬·²± Ô±½¿¬·±²æ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð¸¿» î ø½·¬§ ±©²»¼ °®±°»®¬§÷ Ì¸» °®±°±»¼ °®±¶»½¬ ©±«´¼ ½±²¬®«½¬ ¿² ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ d ³·´» ´±²¹ »¹³»²¬ ±º ¾·½§½´»ó °»¼»¬®·¿² ¬®¿·´ô »¨¬»²¼·²¹ ¬¸» »¨·¬·²¹ Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ì®¿·´ º®±³ Þ´¿½µ¾»®®§ Ú¿®³ Ð¿®µ ¬± Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Þ±«´»ª¿®¼ ¿²¼ ½±²²»½¬·²¹ ¬± »¨·¬·²¹ ¾·½§½´» ´¿²» ¿²¼ ¾« ¬±° ¬¸»®»ò Ì¸» °®±¶»½¬ ©±«´¼ ®»¬±®» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µô ·²¬¿´´ ²¿¬·ª» °´¿²¬·²¹ ¿²¼ ½®»¿¬» ¿ ²»© ¾¿½µ©¿¬»® ¿®»¿ò ×¬ ©±«´¼ ±°»² ¬¸» °¿®½»´ µ²±©² ¿ ¬¸» Í¬±½µ´³»·® °®±°»®¬§ ¬± ¬¸» °«¾´·½ò Ì¸» °®±¶»½¬ ©±«´¼ ®»²±ª¿¬» ¬¸» »¨·¬·²¹ °¿®µ·²¹ ´±¬ ¿¬ ¬¸» Þ´¿½µ¾»®®§ Ú¿®³ Ù±´º Ý±«®» ¿²¼ Þ´«» Ð¸»¿¿²¬ Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ô °®±ª·¼» ½®±©¿´µ ¿²¼ ©¿´µ©¿§ ½±²²»½¬·±²ô ¿²¼ ·²¬¿´´ ±²ó¬®»»¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿ ¾« ¼®±°ó±ºº ¿®»¿ò Ì¸· °®±°±»¼ °®±¶»½¬ ©¿ ½±²¬»³°´¿¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» Í¬»ª»² Ý®»»µ Ý±®®·¼±® Ð¿®µ Ó¿¬»® Ð´¿² ¿²¼ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² Ð´¿² ×²·¬·¿´ Í¬«¼§ñÓ·¬·¹¿¬»¼ Ò»¹¿¬·ª» Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² ø×ÍñÓÒÜ÷ °®»°¿®»¼ ·² îððêå ¸±©»ª»®ô ¿ ²»© ×ÍñÓÒÜ ¸¿ ¾»»² °®»°¿®»¼ ¼«» ¬± ®»½»²¬ ½¸¿²¹» ·² ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ °®±¶»½¬ ¼»½®·°¬·±²ò ß®½¸»±´±¹·½¿´ñÝ«´¬«®¿´ Ì¸»®» ©·´´ ¾» ¿ Í¬±° É±®µ Ñ®¼»® ·² ¬¸» ½±²¬®«½¬·±² ¼±½«³»²¬ ¸±«´¼ ¿²§ o ¿®¬·º¿½¬ ¾» ¼·½±ª»®»¼ ±² ·¬» ß² ß®½¸»±´±¹·¬ · ½¸»¼«´»¼ ¬± ª··¬ ¬¸» ·¬» ¿¬ ´»¿¬ ¬©·½» ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» o ®»¬±®¿¬·±² °®±½» Ð®»½±²¬®«½¬·±² ¬®¿·²·²¹ ©·´´ ¾» °®±ª·¼»¼ ¬± ½±²¬®¿½¬±® o Ì®»»ñÐ´¿²¬·²¹ Ý®»»µ Î»¬±®¿¬·±² ·²½´«¼» ®»³±ª·²¹ ¬¸» ½±²½®»¬» ¬®«½¬«®»ô ®»°´¿²¬·²¹ o ²¿¬·ª» ª»¹»¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ½®»»µ ©·¼»²·²¹ Ð®·±® ¬± ®»³±ª¿´ ±º ¿²§ ±·´ô ¿³°´» ©·´´ ¾» ¬»¬»¼ º±® ¿²§ ¸»®¾·½·¼¿´ ±® o °»¬·½·¼» ®»·¼«» Ì®»» ®»°´¿½»³»²¬ ©·´´ ¾» ¼±²» ·² ¿½½±®¼¿²½» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ý·¬§ Ì®»» Ñ®¼·²¿²½» o Í°»½·¿´ °®»½¿«¬·±² ©·´´ ¾» ¬¿µ»² ¬± ³¿µ» «®» ÍÑÜÍ ø·²º»½¬»¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´÷¿®» o ²±¬ ·³°±®¬»¼ ·²¬± ¬¸» ¿®»¿ ¿²¼ ¬± °®±¬»½¬ ¬¸» ±¿µ ¬®»» º®±³ ¼·»¿» Þ·±´±¹·½¿´ñÉ·´¼´·º» ×³°®±ª»³»²¬ ¬± ¬¸» ½®»»µ ©·´´ °®±ª·¼» ¾»¬¬»® ¸¿¾·¬¿¬ º±® ¬¸» ½®»»µ ©·´¼´·º» o ß °®»ó½±²¬®«½¬·±² «®ª»§ ©·´´ ¾» ½±²¼«½¬»¼ º±® °®»»²½» ±º °®±¬»½¬»¼ o ©·´¼´·º» ¿¬ ¬¸» ·¬» Ý±²¼«½¬ °®»ó½±²¬®«½¬·±² ¬®¿·²·²¹ ©·¬¸ ½±²¬®¿½¬±® ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ °®±¬»½¬»¼ o ©·´¼´·º» Í°»»¼ ´·³·¬ ©·´´ ¾» »¬¿¾´·¸»¼ ¿¬ ¬¸» ½±²¬®«½¬·±² ·¬» o ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´ Ü·½«·±² ß ²»© ×²·¬·¿´ Í¬«¼§ ¿²¼ Ó·¬·¹¿¬»¼ Ò»¹¿¬·ª» Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² ¸¿ ¾»»² °®»°¿®»¼ o ¾»½¿«» ¬¸» ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§ º±® ¬¸» ½®»»µ ®»¬±®¿¬·±² º±® ¬¸· °¸¿» ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ · ¼·ºº»®»²¬ º®±³ ¬¸» ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§ ±«¬´·²»¼ ·² ¬¸» °®»ª·±« ×ÍñÓÒÜ Ì¸» ×²·¬·¿´ Í¬«¼§ ¿²¼ Ó·¬·¹¿¬»¼ Ò»¹¿¬·ª» Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² · ·² ¬¸» °«¾´·½ o ½±³³»²¬ °»®·±¼ ¿²¼ ·² ®»ª·»© ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Í¬¿¬» Ý´»¿®·²¹¸±«» Í±·´ ¬»¬·²¹ º±® Ó»®½«®§ ¿²¼ Í»´»²·«³ ¸±«´¼ ¾» ½±²·¼»®»¼ ø°»® Ý±³³·¬¬»» o ³»³¾»® Ý¸¿²¹÷ ß ²»·¹¸¾±® ½±³³»²¬»¼ ±² ¬¸» »¿¬»®² ¿²¼ ©»¬»®² ³¿¨·³«³ °±·¾´» o ¿´·¹²³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» ¬®¿·´ ¿²¼ ½®»»µ ß ®»·¼»²¬ °±µ» ·² º¿ª±® ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ¿²¼ ¿µ»¼ ¿¾±«¬ ¬¸» °®±°±»¼ ²»© o ½®±©¿´µ ßÝÌ×ÑÒæ Î»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² º±® ¿°°®±ª¿´ ±º ¿ Ó·¬·¹¿¬»¼ Ò»¹¿¬·ª» Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² ÓÑÌ×ÑÒæ Þ¿®®§ Ý¸¿²¹ ÍÛÝÑÒÜæ ß¿®¬· Í¸®·ª¿¬¿ª¿ ÒÑÛÍæ ²±²» ÊÑÌÛæ ëóð ÑÔÜ ÞËÍ×ÒÛÍÍ Ò±²» Î»°»½¬º«´´§ «¾³·¬¬»¼ô ññÞ»¬¸ Û¾¾»² Þ»¬¸ Û¾¾»² ß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» Ý´»®µ Ùñ°´¿²²·²¹ñ»®½ñ¿½¬·±²³·²«¬»ðèïèïï PUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting:September 20, 2011 Subject Appropriation of Match Funding for Dedication of Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge Recommended Action Approve the appropriation of funds to match the contribution from the Friends of Don Burnett for the signage and dedication ceremony to be held on October 8, 2011 in an amount not to exceed $4,000. Discussion In July, 2011California Legislature approved a resolution authored by Senator Joe Simitian to rename the Mary Avenue Bridge in honor of former Cupertino Councilmember and Mayor, Don Burnett.The official name of the bridge is now the “Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge.” Attached is the Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 35 which has been adopted. The Friends of Don Burnett has asked for the City’s assistance in coordinating and advertising a naming ceremony to be held at the south entrance to the bridge on October8, 2011.The Friends would also like to install a sign or plaque to be located near the bridge approach, and they would like the City’s assistance in matching funds for this plaque. The signs will provide a brief summary ofthe history of the bridge including Don’s role in making it happen.The design would beconsistent with the existing artwork at the bridge and areexpected to cost approximately $8,000. Fiscal Impact Up to $4,000 is available in the Engineering, Professional Services Account No. 110-8101-7014. _____________________________________ Prepared by:Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Department Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:Attachment A -Don Burnett LegislatureBill ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICESDEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting:September 20, 2011 Subject Consider approval of the Library Commission’s recommendation for the appointment ofthefirst Cupertino Poet Laureate. Recommended Action Adopt a resolution approving the Library Commission recommendation and appointingthe first Cupertino Poet Laureate. Description Resolution No. 10-230designated a Cupertino Poet Laureate and requested the Library Commission to appoint a selection committee to oversee and administer the program including recruitment. In December 2010, the Library Commission formed a sub-committee to define and establisha Cupertino Poet Laureate position and identify a candidate for recommendation to the City Council.The term for this non-paid, volunteer position is two years from the date of the appointment. After an extensive search effort,the sub-committee (consistingof members from the Library, Fine Arts and College communities)has recommendedDavid Denny asthe Cupertino’s first PoetLaureate. His charge is to stimulate cultural and literacy awareness in Cupertino,introduce youth and adults to the personal and community benefits of poetry both as personal expression and as reflective of our history and culture,reveal, recognize and engage literary talent residing in the communityand promote our Library as thecultural center of Cupertino. Since 1986, Mr. Denny has taught various literature, writing, drama and poetry courses in the English Department of DeAnza College. He has been published in over 15 literary journals and edits the Bottomfishmagazine published by DeAnza College. He’s a graduate of CSU Long Beach and has a Master of Fine Arts from the University of Oregon. He is about to publish his next poetry book,Plebian on the Front Porch.His own poetry reveals a great love for Cupertino, its landscape and landmarks. More importantly, he’s extremelygood engendering enthusiasm for writing in people of diverse ethnic backgrounds. He has already proposed several community poetry reading and writing projects.The Library Commissionrespectfully requests the City Council to act upon itsrecommendation. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Carol Atwood Reviewed by: Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: Draft Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE LIBRARY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPOINTING THECUPERTINO POET LAUREATE WHEREAS, the Resolution No. 10-230 designated a Cupertino Poet Laureate position; and WHEREAS, the Cupertino Poet Laureate will be charged to stimulate cultural and literary awareness in Cupertino,introduce youth and adults to the personal and community benefits of poetry both as personal expression as reflective of our history and culture, reveal, recognize and engage literary talent residing in the community and promote our Library as the cultural center of Cupertino; and WHEREAS, after an extensive search effort, the Poet Laureate Committee and the Library Commission have unanimously recommended David Denny for the two year voluntary position; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approve the recommendation and appoint David Denny as Cupertino’s first Poet Laureate for a two year term. PASSED AND ADOPTED ata regular meeting of the City Council of the City of th Cupertino this20day of September 2011by the following vote: VoteMembers of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: Kimberly Smith, City ClerkGilbert Wong, Mayor, City of Cupertino COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 20, 2011 Subject Ordinance to “Opt-In” to an Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program under ABx1 27, the Voluntary Redevelopment Program Act. Recommended Action Conduct second reading and enact Ordinance No. 11-2080: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino enacted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34193 to elect and implement participation by the City of Cupertino and the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment program pursuant to part 1.9 of the California Community Redevelopment Law"(Attachment A). Description Ordinance No. 11-2080 allows the City of Cupertino to continue its redevelopment agency as long as the City of Cupertino commits to provide annual contributions to local schools and special districts. Discussion , On September 6, 2011the City Council conductedthe first reading of Ordinance No. 11-2080 opting in to the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program under ABx1 27. No changes have been made to the Ordinance since it was last presented to the Council. _____________________________________ Prepared by:Vera Gil,Senior Planner Reviewed by:David Woo, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: A:Ordinance No. 11-2080 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 11-2080 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ENACTED PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34193 TO ELECT AND IMPLEMENT PARTICIPATION BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE VOLUNTARY ALTERNATIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO PART 1.9 OF THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.RECITALS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION a.Pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 etseq.; the "Redevelopment Law"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Cupertino (the "City") adopted Ordinance No. 1421 declaring the need for the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") to function in the City. b.Also in accordance with the Redevelopment Law, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1850, on August 21, 2000, adopting the Redevelopment Plan For the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project Area(the "Redevelopment Plan"), and the Agency is responsible for implementing the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the Redevelopment Law. c.ABx1 26 (the "Dissolution Act") and ABx1 27 (the "Voluntary Program Act"; and together with the Dissolution Act, the"Redevelopment Restructuring Acts") have been enacted to significantly modify the Redevelopment Law generally as follows: 1.The Dissolution Act immediately suspends all new redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness, and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 2011; and 2.The Voluntary Program Act, through the addition of Part 1.9 to the Redevelopment Law (the "Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program"), allows a redevelopment agency to avoid dissolution under the Dissolution Act by opting into an alternative voluntary redevelopment program requiring specified annual contributions to local school and special districts. d.Specifically, Section 34193(a) of the Redevelopment Law (as added to the Redevelopment Law by the Voluntary Program Act) authorizes the City Council to enact an ordinance to comply with Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, thereby exempting the Agency from the provisions of the Dissolution Act, and enabling the Agency to continue to exist and function under the Redevelopment Law, so long as the City and the Agency comply with the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program set forth in Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law. Ordinance No. 11-2080 e.Through the adoption and enactment of this Ordinance, it is the intent of the City Council to enact the ordinance described in Section 34193(a) of the Redevelopment Law and to participate for itself and on behalf of the Agency in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program set forth in Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law. f.Pursuant to Section 34193.2(b) of the Redevelopment Law, the City Council understands that participation in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program requires remittance of certain payments as set forth in the Voluntary Program Act (as further described below), and also constitutes an agreement on the part of the City, in the event the City fails to make such remittance payments, to assign its rights to any payments owed by the Agency, including, but not limited to, payments from loan agreements, to the State of California. g.The City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance, to waive any rights of appeal regarding the amount of any remittance payments established by the California Department of Finance, as provided in the VoluntaryProgram Act. h.On August 11, 2011, the California Supreme Court agreed to review the California Redevelopment Association and League of California Cities’ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts and issued an order granting a partial stay on specified portions of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts, as modified on August 17, 2011 (the “Stay”), including a stay of the provisions of the Voluntary Program Act. i.Accordingly, the City Council intends to adopt this Ordinance understanding that it will be effective only upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional. SECTION 2.ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO REDEVELOPMENT LAW SECTION 34193(a) To the extent required by law to maintain the existence and powers of the Agency under the Redevelopment Law (including the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts), the City Council hereby enacts the ordinance authorized by Section 34193(a) of the Redevelopment Law, whereby the City, on behalf of itself and the Agency, elects to and will comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, including the making of the community remittance payments called for in Section 34194 of the Redevelopment Law (the "Remittance Payments"), and whereby the Agency will no longer be subject to dissolution or the other prohibitions and limitations of Parts 1.8 and 1.85 of the Redevelopment Law as added by the Dissolution Act. SECTION 3.EFFECT OF STAY OR DETERMINATION OF INVALIDITY The City shall not make any community remittance in the event a court of competent jurisdiction either grants a stay on the enforcement of AB X1 26 and AB X1 27 or determines that AB X1 26 or AB X1 27 are unconstitutional and therefore invalid,and all appeals therefrom are exhausted or unsuccessful, or time for filing an appeal therefrom are exhausted or unsuccessful, or time for filing an appeal therefrom has lapsed. Any community remittance shall be made under protest and without prejudice to the City's right to recover such amount and interest thereon in the event that there is a final determination that AB X1 26 or AB X1 27 are unconstitutional. 2 Ordinance No. 11-2080 SECTION 4.ADDITIONAL UNDERSTANDINGS AND INTENT It is the understanding and intent of the City Council that the City will enter into an agreement with the Agency as authorized pursuant to Section 34194.2 of the Redevelopment Law, whereby the Agency will transfer annual portions of its tax increment to the City in amounts not to exceed the annual Remittance Payments (the "Agency Transfer Payments") to enable the City, directly or indirectly, to make the annual Remittance Payments. Unless otherwise specified by resolution of the City Council, it is the City Council's intent that the City's annual Remittance Payments shall be made exclusively from the Agency Transfer Payments or from other funds that become available as a result of the City's receipt of the Agency Transfer Payments. The City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance, to pledge any of its general fund revenues or other assets to make the Remittance Payments, it being understood by the City Council that any Remittance Payments will be funded solely from the Agency Transfer Payments and/or other assets transferred to the Cityin accordance with the Voluntary Program Act. SECTION 5.AUTHORIZATION OF IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS The City Manager or the City Manager's designee is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take any actions necessary to implement this Ordinance and comply with the Voluntary Program Act, including, without limitation, providing required notices to the County Auditor-Controller, the State Controller, and the Department of Finance, entering into any agreements with the Agency to obtain the Agency Transfer Payments, and making the Remittance Payments. SECTION 6.CEQA The City Council finds, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4), that this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that it is not a Project, but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism for potential future projects and programs, and does not commit funds to any specific project or program. The appropriate environmental review shall be completed in accordance with CEQA prior to the commencement of any future Agency-supported project or program. The City Council therefore directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Santa Clara in accordance with the CEQA guidelines. SECTION 7.SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional and invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 3 Ordinance No. 11-2080 SECTION 8.ENACTMENTAND EFFECTIVE DATES This Ordinance is deemed enacted as of September __, 2011 for purposes of Section 34193(a) of the Redevelopment Law, and shall take effect and will be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption, conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional. SECTION 9.PUBLICATION AND POSTING The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall give notice of its adoption as required by law. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36933, a summary of this Ordinance may be published and posted in lieu of publication and posting of the entire text. INTRODUCEDat a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Council the 6th day of September 2011 and ENACTEDat a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Council on the day of September 2011 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST:APPROVED: Kimberly SmithGilbert Wong City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 4 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICESDEPARTMENT ùóèãôûðð èíêê÷ûæ÷îç÷§ùçì÷êèóîíùû è÷ð÷ìôíî÷ ÅÅÅÙÇÌ×ÊÈÓÎÍÍÊÕ CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYSTAFF REPORT Meeting:September 20, 2011 Subject Agency Transfer Payment Agreement Between the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency and the City of Cupertino Recommended Action A. Redevelopment Agency action –Adopt Resolution No. 11-______, approving the execution ofthe Agency Transfer Payment Agreement with the City of Cupertino B. City Council action –Adopt Resolution No. 11-______, approving the execution ofthe Agency Transfer Payment Agreement with the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Description The Agreement facilitatesthe remittance payments required under the new opt-in ordinance that allows the Redevelopment Agency to continue its existence.Since the Agreement is between the Agency and the City, the Agency Board and City Council both need to adopt resolutions forthe Agreement. Discussion On September 6, 2011, the City Council conducted the first reading of an ordinance that allows the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency to continue in existence if the City, on behalf of the Agency, makes remittance payments to the County, for the benefit of local schools and special districts. If the second reading andadoption of the ordinance occurearlier tonight, then staff recommends that the Agency and City enter into an Agency Transfer Payment Agreement to formally provide the redevelopment property taxesnecessary to make the payments.Executing the Agreement before September 30, 2011 allows the Agency to avoid possiblyhigher payments in the future by allowing this Agreement to be listed on an October 1, 2011 Statement of Indebtedness (SOI).If the Agreement were to be listed on the SOI later than October 1, then increased remittance payments would be required in upcoming years. If the ordinance goes into effect without this Agreement, then the City would not have thefunds to make the payments. Fiscal Impact As shown in a September 6 meeting chart, $1,050,000 intotal remittance payments required under Agency opt-in or continuationwould go to schools and special districts over the next four years.The Agreement provides the Agency property taxes for these payments. _____________________________________ Prepared by: David Woo, Finance Director Reviewed by: Carol A. Atwood, Director of Administrative Services Approved for Submission by:David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments:Draft Agency Board Resolution Draft City Council Resolution Agency Transfer Payment Agreement RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGENCY TRANSFER PAYMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CUPERTINOPURSUANT TO PART 1.9 OF THE REDEVELOPMENT LAW WHEREAS, pursuant tothe California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 etseq.; the "Redevelopment Law"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Cupertino (the "City") adopted Ordinance No. 1850, on August 21, 2000, adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino VallcoRedevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan"), as amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") is responsible for implementing the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the Redevelopment Law; and WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, ABX1 26 (the "Dissolution Act") and ABX1 27 (the "Voluntary Program Act")(collectively, the "Redevelopment Restructuring Acts") have been enacted to significantly modify the Redevelopment Law generally as follows: The Dissolution Act immediately suspendedall new redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness, and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 2011; and The Voluntary Program Act , trough the addition of Part 1.9 to the Redevelopment Law ("Part 1.9"), establishes a voluntary alternative redevelopment program whereby the Agency is authorized to continue to exist upon the enactment of an ordinance by the City to comply with Part 1.9, including payment of an annual remittance to the County Auditor-Controller (the "Opt-In Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the California Supreme Court (the "Court") agreed to review the California Redevelopment Association and League of California Cities' petition challenging the constitutionality of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts and issued an order granting a partial stay on specified portions of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts, as modified on August 17, 2011 (the "Stay"), including astay of the provisions of the Voluntary Program Act; and WHEREAS, the City has enacted the Opt-InOrdinance prior to consideration of this Resolution,conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional;and WHEREAS, Section 34194.2 of the California Redevelopment Law authorizes the Agency to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the Agency agrees to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the City, in an amount equal to the annual remittance required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 to the County Auditor-Controller; and 1 WHEREAS, for reasons further set forth in the staff report accompanying this Resolution (the "Staff Report"), the City and the Agency desire to enter into an agreement, whereby the Agency will transfer to the City sufficient funds to make the annual remittance required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9, and the City will make the annual remittances to the County Auditor- Controller in satisfaction of the requirements underChapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law (the "Agency Transfer Payment Agreement"); and WHEREAS, as fully set forth in the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement, the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement will be immediately binding upon the parties, but the operation of its terms will be conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional; and WHEREAS, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4) the approval of the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), in that it is not a project, but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism and does not commit funds to any specific project or program; and WHEREAS, the Agency Board has reviewed and duly considered the Staff Report, documents and other written evidence presented at the meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Agency Board findsthat the above Recitals are true and correct and have served, together with the supporting documents, as the basis for the findings and approvals set forth below. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Agency Board finds, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4), that this resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that it is not a Project, but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism and does not commit funds to any specific project or program. The Agency Board therefore directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Santa Clarain accordance with the CEQA guidelines. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Agency Board hereby approves the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement and authorizes the Agency Executive Director or the Executive Director's designee to execute on behalf of the Agency the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement, substantially in the formon file with the City Clerk and the Agency Secretary and with such revisions thereto as may be approved by the Agency Counsel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Agency Board authorizes the Agency's Executive Director or the Executive Director's designee to take such other actions and execute such other documents as are appropriate to effectuate the intent of this Resolution and to implement the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement on behalf of the Agency. 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall take immediate effect upon adoption. The above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a meeting by the Agency Board on the 20thday of September,2011 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution on file in the office of the Agency Secretary of the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency,this _____day of ____, 2011. __________________________________ Kimberly Smith, Agency Secretary Approved: __________________________________ Gilbert Wong, Agency Chairperson 3 RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGENCY TRANSFER PAYMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PURSUANT TO PART 1.9 OF THE REDEVELOPMENT LAW WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 etseq.; the "Redevelopment Law"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Cupertino (the "City") adopted Ordinance No. 1850, on August 21, 2000, adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino VallcoRedevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan"), as amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") is responsible for implementing the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the Redevelopment Law; and WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, ABX1 26 (the "Dissolution Act") and ABX1 27 (the "Voluntary Program Act";collectively, the "Redevelopment Restructuring Acts") have been enacted to significantly modify the Redevelopment Law generally as follows: The Dissolution Act immediately suspendedall new redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness, and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 2011; and The Voluntary Program Act , trough the addition of Part 1.9 to the Redevelopment Law ("Part 1.9"), establishes a voluntary alternative redevelopment program whereby the Agency is authorized to continue to exist upon the enactment of an ordinance by the City to comply with Part 1.9, including payment of an annual remittance to the County Auditor-Controller (the "Opt-In Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the California Supreme Court (the "Court") agreed to review the California Redevelopment Association and League of California Cities' petition challenging the constitutionality of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts and issued an order granting a partial stay on specified portions of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts, as modified on August 17, 2011 (the "Stay"), including a stay of the provisions of the Voluntary Program Act; and WHEREAS, the City has enacted the Opt-InOrdinance prior to consideration of this Resolution, conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional; and WHEREAS, Section 34194.2 of the California Redevelopment Law authorizes the Agency to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the Agency agrees to transfer a portion 1 990052\1\1010403.2 of its tax increment to the City, in an amount equal to the annual remittance required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 to the County Auditor-Controller; and WHEREAS, for reasons further set forth in the staff report accompanying this Resolution (the "Staff Report"), the City and the Agency desire toenter into an agreement, whereby the Agency will transfer to the City sufficient funds to make the annual remittance required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9, and the City will make the annual remittances to the County Auditor- Controller in satisfaction of the requirements under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 (the "Agency Transfer Payment Agreement"); and WHEREAS, as fully set forth in the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement, the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement will be immediately binding upon the parties, but the operation of its terms will be conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional; and WHEREAS, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4) the approval of theAgency Transfer Payment Agreement is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), in that it is not a project, but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism and does not commit funds to any specific project or program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and duly considered the Staff Report, documents and other written evidence presented at the meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council finds thatthe above Recitals are true and correct and have served, together with the supporting documents, as the basis for the findings and approvals set forth below. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4), that this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that it is not a Project, but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism and does not commit funds to any specific project or program. The City Council therefore directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Santa Clarain accordance with the CEQA guidelines. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement and authorizes the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to execute on behalf of the City the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement, substantially in the form on file with the City Clerk and the Agency Secretary and with such revisions thereto as may be approved by the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to take such other actions and execute such other documents as are appropriate to effectuate the intent of this Resolution and to implement the Agency Transfer Payment Agreement on behalf of the City. 2 990052\1\1010403.2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall take immediate effect upon adoption. The above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a meeting by the City Council on the 20thday of September,2011 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of the City of Cupertino, this _____ day of ____, 2011. __________________________________ Kimberly Smith, City Clerk Approved: __________________________________ Gilbert Wong, Mayor 3 990052\1\1010403.2 AGENCY TRANSFER PAYMENT AGREEMENT This Agency Transfer Payment Agreement (the "Agreement"), is entered into as of the 21stday of September, 2011, by and between Redevelopment Agency of the City of Cupertino, a public body, corporate and politic (the "Agency"), and the City of Cupertino, a municipal corporation(the "City"), with reference to the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties: RECITALS A.Pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.; the "Redevelopment Law"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City adopted Ordinance No. 1421,declaring the need for the Agency to function in the City. B.The City Council also adopted Ordinance No. 1850, on August 21, 2000, adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project Area, as amended from time to time (the "Redevelopment Plan"), and the Agency is responsible for implementing the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the Redevelopment Law. C.ABx1 26 (the "Dissolution Act") and ABx1 27 (the "Voluntary Program Act"; collectively, the "Redevelopment Restructuring Acts") have been enacted to significantly modify the Redevelopment Law generally as follows: 1.The Dissolution Act immediately suspendedall new redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness, and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 2011; and 2.The Voluntary Program Act, through the addition of Part 1.9 to the Redevelopment Law (the "Voluntary AlternativeRedevelopment Program"), allows a redevelopment agency to avoid dissolution under the Dissolution Act by opting into avoluntary alternativeredevelopment program requiring specified annual contributions to local school and special districts. D.Specifically, Section 34193(a) of the Redevelopment Law (as added to the Redevelopment Law by the Voluntary Program Act) authorizes the City Council to enact an ordinance to comply with Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, thereby exempting the Agency from the provisions of the Dissolution Act, and enabling the Agency to continue to exist and function under the Redevelopment Law, so long as the City and the Agency comply with the Voluntary AlternativeRedevelopment Program set forth in Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law. E.On August 11, 2011, the California Supreme Court (the "Court") agreed to review the California Redevelopment Association, League of California Citiesand others' petition challenging the constitutionality of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts and issued an order granting a partial stay on specified portions of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts, as modified on August 17, 2011 (the "Stay"), including a stay of the provisions of the Voluntary Program Act. 1 394\08\1022924.1 F.Through the adoption and enactment of Ordinance No. 11-2080, on September 20, 2011, the City Council, pursuant to Section 34193(a) of the Redevelopment Law, has elected to participate for itself and on behalf of the Agency in the Voluntary AlternativeRedevelopment Program set forth in Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law,conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional. G.Pursuant to Sections 34193.2(b) and 34195(b) of the Redevelopment Law, the City Council understands that participation in the Voluntary AlternativeRedevelopment Program requires remittance of certain payments as set forth in Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, and also constitutes an agreement on the part of the City, in the event the City fails to make such remittance payments, to assign to the State of California its rights to any payments owed by the Agency, including, but not limited to, payments from loan agreements and this Agreement. H.Pursuant to Section 34194.2 of the Redevelopment Law, the City and Agency have elected to enter into this Agreement, whereby the Agency agrees to transfer a portion of the Agency’s tax increment to the City, in an amount equal to the annual remittance required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, for purposes of financingactivities within the redevelopment areas that are related to accomplishing the redevelopment agency project goals. I.Pursuant to Section 34194.1 of the Redevelopment Law, the City may use any available funds not otherwise obligated for other uses to make the remittances to the County Auditor-Controller required pursuant Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law. J.The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the transfer of tax increment and other funds from the Agency to the City in the amounts required to make each of the annual remittances mandated under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law. K.The obligations of the Agency under this Agreement constitute an indebtedness of the Agency with respect to the redevelopment projects for the Redevelopment Plans within the meaning of Section 16 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. L.The City Council does not intend, by execution of this Agreement, to waive any rights of appeal regarding the amount of any remittance payments established by the California Department of Finance, as provided in the Voluntary Program Act. M.Under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4) this Agreement is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), in that it is not a project, but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism for potential future projects and programs, and does not commit funds to any specific project or program. N.The parties intend that, while this Agreement will be binding upon the parties as of the date set forth in the opening paragraph, the operation of the terms of this Agreement will be conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Actis constitutional. 2 394\08\1022924.1 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals hereof and the mutual promises and covenants set forth in this Agreement, the Agency and the City agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 1.1General Purpose. To the extent required by law to maintain the existence and powers of the Agency under the Redevelopment Lawand conditioned as further provided in Section 2.9, the City and the Agency hereby enter into this Agreement whereby the Agency agrees to transfer a portion of its tax increment to the City, in an amount equal to the annual remittances required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, for the purpose of financing activities within the redevelopment areas that are related to accomplishing the Agency’s project goals for the Project Areas. 1.2Transfers to City. The Agency shall transfer to the City, in a timely manner, funds from sources described in Section 1.3, in an amount equal to the annual remittances required under Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law, as such may be adjusted (the "Agency Transfer Payments"). 1.3Source of Agency Transfer Payments. Any combination of the following shall constitute eligible sources for the Agency Transfer Payments: a.Any tax increment funds allocated to the Agency pursuantto Section 33670 of the Redevelopment Law net of existing debt service payments and existing third-party contractual obligations, and excluding: (1) amounts required to be allocated to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, pursuant to Sections 33334.2, 33334.3, and 33334.6 of the Redevelopment Law; and (2) any funds on deposit in the Agency’s Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund; b.Any other funds previously or subsequently made available to the City by the Agency, including any unencumbered funds previously pledged to the City by the Agency under an agreement for payment of public improvements and other redevelopment activities; c.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, for the 2011-2012 fiscal year alone, any portion of the amount of tax increment required to be allocated to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, pursuant to Sections 33334.2, 33334.3, and 33334.6 of the Redevelopment Law for the 2011-2012 fiscal year, to the extent the Agency makes the finding that there are insufficient other funds to meet its debt and other obligations, current priority program needs, or its obligations to provide the Agency Transfer Payments under this Agreement. 1.4Payment of Remittances by City. Subject to the receipt of sufficient Agency Transfer Payments pursuantto Section 1.2 above, the City shall remit to the County Auditor- Controller the payments required pursuant to Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law on or before the dates prescribed in Section 34194(d)(1). The City’s obligations to make the remittances required hereunder shall be a special limited obligation of the City payable solely 3 394\08\1022924.1 from the Agency Transfer Payments provided to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and such remittances shall be made exclusively from the Agency Transfer Payments or from other funds that become available as a result of the City’s receipt of the Agency Transfer Payments. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to be a pledge of the City’s general fund revenues or other assets for the purposes of funding the remittances required by Chapter 3 of Part 1.9 of the Redevelopment Law. 1.5Subordination. The City shall consider in good faith any request by the Agency to subordinate the City’s interest herein and to allow the Agency to pledge all or any portion of the tax increment revenue on a senior pledge basis to secure payments due on future indebtedness pledged with tax increment. ARTICLE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1No Third Party Beneficiaries. No person or entity other than the Agency and the City and their permitted successors and assigns, shall have any right of action under this Agreement. 2.2State Law. This Agreement, and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto, shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 2.3Additional Acts. The parties each agree to take such other and additional actions and execute and deliver such other and additional documents as may be reasonably requested by the other party for purposes of implementing the actions contemplated under this Agreement. 2.4Litigation Regarding Agreement Validity. In the event litigation is initiated attacking the validity of this Agreement, each party shall in good faith defend and seek to uphold the Agreement. 2.5Severability. If any provisions of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person, party, transaction, or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to other persons, parties, transactions, or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby. 2.6Entire Agreement; Modification and Amendment. This Agreement contains all of the agreements and understandings of the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained herein and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties. This Agreement cannot be amended or modified except by written agreement of the parties. 2.7Binding Upon Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest and assigns of each of the parties to this Agreement, whether by agreement or operation of law, and including, without limitation, any successor to the Agency. Any reference in this Agreement to a specifically named party shall be deemed to apply to any successor, heir, administrator, executor or assign of 4 394\08\1022924.1 such party who has acquired an interest in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, or under law. 2.8Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of all duties and obligations under this Agreement. 2.9Binding Effect; Operation of Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties as of the date set forth in the opening paragraph of this Agreement. The operation of the terms of this Agreement shall be conditioned upon the lifting of the Stay and the Court's determination that the Voluntary Program Act is constitutional. [Signature Page Follows] 5 394\08\1022924.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the date set forth in the opening paragraph of this Agreement. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO By:________________________________ Name:Gilbert Wong Its:Agency Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________ ____________, Agency Counsel ATTEST: _____________________________ ______________, Agency Secretary CITY OF CUPERTINO By:______________________________ Name:David W. Knapp Its:City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________ Gary Baum,Acting City Attorney ATTEST: ___________________________ Kimberly Smith, City Clerk 6 Transfer Agreement Signature Page 394\08\1022924.1