Loading...
2-21-12 Searchable Packet Table of Contents Agenda2 February 7 City Council minutes Draft minutes5 Accounts Payable for period ending January 27, 2012 Draft Resolution12 Accounts Payable for period ending February 3, 2012 Draft Resolution23 Municipal Improvements, 21856 Hermosa Avenue Staff Report33 A. Map34 Municipal Improvements, 22641 Alcalde Road Staff Report35 A. Map36 Planning Commission’s recommendation to select Marty Miller as the Environmental Review Committee representative Staff Report37 Ordinance to install bike lanes on Rodrigues Avenue between De Anza Boulevard and Blaney Avenue Staff Report38 Draft Ordinance39 Consider locations(s) for an off-leash area for dogs Staff Report40 Attachment A43 1 AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING SUCCESSOR TO THEREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10350 Torre Avenue, Community Hall Council Chamber Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:45 PM CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS ANDPRESENTATIONS POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 1.Subject:February 7 City Council minutes Recommended Action:Approve minutes Draft minutes Page:5 2.Subject:Accounts Payable for period ending January 27, 2012 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 12-121 Draft Resolution Page:12 2 Tuesday, February 21, 2012Cupertino City Council Successor to theRedevelopment Agency 3.Subject:Accounts Payable for period ending February 3, 2012 Recommended Action:Adopt Resolution No. 12-122 Draft Resolution Page:23 4.Subject:Municipal Improvements, 21856 Hermosa Avenue Recommended Action:Accept Municipal Improvements Description:The work included sidewalk, curb & gutter, and driveway approach improvements in the City right-of-way Staff Report A. Map Page:33 5.Subject:Municipal Improvements, 22641 Alcalde Road Recommended Action:Accept Municipal Improvements Description:The work included sidewalk, curb & gutter, and driveway approach improvements in the City right-of-way Staff Report A. Map Page:35 6.Subject:Planning Commission’s recommendation to select Marty Miller as the Environmental Review Committee representative Recommended Action:Accept the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the EnvironmentalReview Committee Staff Report Page:37 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 7.Subject:Ordinance to install bike lanes on Rodrigues Avenue between De Anza Boulevard and Blaney Avenue Recommended Action:Conduct second reading and enact Ordinance No. 12-2091: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.08.250 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relatingto Bicycle Lanes-Designated; Rodrigues Avenue between De Anza Boulevard and Blaney Avenue” Staff Report Draft Ordinance Page:38 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 Tuesday, February 21, 2012Cupertino City Council Successor to theRedevelopment Agency ORDINANCESAND ACTION ITEMS 8.Subject:Consider locations(s) for an off-leash area for dogs Recommended Action:Consider location(s) for an off-leash area for dogs and give direction to staff Staff Report Attachment A Page:40 REPORTSBY COUNCIL AND STAFF ADJOURNMENT SUCCESSOR TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled for lack of business. The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Any interested person, including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of the city council’s decision with respect to quasi-judicial actions, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the city clerk within ten days after the council’s decision. Any petition so filed must comply with municipal ordinance code §2.08.096. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk’s office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. 4 DRAFTMINUTES CUPERTINOCITYCOUNCIL RegularAdjourned Meeting Tuesday,February 7, 2012 ROLLCALL At5:30p.m.MayorMarkSantorocalledtheregularmeetingtoorderinConferenceRoomAof CityHall, 10300 TorreAvenue,Cupertino,California. Present:MayorMarkSantoro,Vice-MayorOrrinMahoney,andCouncilmembersBarryChang, MarkSantoro,andRodSinks.Absent:None. COMMISSION INTERVIEWS 1.Subject:LibraryCommissioninterviews RecommendedAction:Conductinterviews TheCityCouncilinterviewed JanetRiddellandappointed hertofillthe unscheduled vacancy fora one-yeartermending 2013. RECESS Councilwasinrecessfrom5:45to6:00p.m.,andreconvenedintheCouncilChamber, CupertinoCommunityHall, 10350 TorreAvenue. ROLLCALL Present:MayorMarkSantoro,Vice-MayorOrrinMahoney,andCouncilmembersBarryChang, MarkSantoro,andRodSinks.Absent:None. CLOSEDSESSION 2.Subject:ConferencewithLaborNegotiator(GovernmentCode 54957.6);Agency negotiator: CarolAtwood; Employee organizations:CEAandOE3 At6:00p.m.Councilrecessedtoaclosedsession,andreconvenedinpublicsessionat8:07 p.m.MayorSantoroannouncedthatCouncilhadmetwithitsrepresentatives,gavedirection tothe negotiators,and no actionwastaken. 5 February 7, 2012CupertinoCityCouncilPage 2 PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE At8:08p.m.MayorMarkSantorocalledtheregularmeetingtoorderintheCouncilChamber, 10350 TorreAvenue,Cupertino,California,andledthePledge ofAllegiance. ROLLCALL Present:MayorMarkSantoro,Vice-MayorOrrinMahoney,andCouncilmembersBarryChang, MarkSantoro,andRodSinks.Absent:None. CEREMONIALMATTERSANDPRESENTATIONS 3.Subject: TeenCommission update on theAnti-TobaccoGrant project RecommendedAction:Receive update RepresentativesfromtheTeenCommissiondescribedtheYouthActionCommission(YAC) Attackprogramandhowgrantfundsarebeingusedtopromoteawarenessaboutthehealth issuesrelatedtosmoking.Theyalsonotedthattheywillbeworkingwithteencommissions from othercitiesaswell.Councilreceivedthe updateand no actionwastaken. POSTPONEMENTS -None ORALCOMMUNICATIONS -None CONSENTCALENDAR WongmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovetheitemsontheConsentCalendaras recommended,withtheexceptionofItemNo.17whichwaspulledfordiscussion.Ayes:Chang, Mahoney,Santoro,Sinks,andWong.Noes:None.Abstain:None. 4.Subject:January 10 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes 5.Subject:January 17 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes 6.Subject:January 23 CityCouncilminutes RecommendedAction:Approveminutes 7.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingNovember 10, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-009 8.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingNovember 18, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-010 6 February 7, 2012CupertinoCityCouncilPage 3 9.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingNovember 23, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-011 10.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 2, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-012 11.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 9, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-013 12.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 16, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-014 13.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingDecember 29, 2011 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-015 14.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingJanuary 6, 2012 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-016 15.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingJanuary 13, 2012 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-017 16.Subject:AccountsPayablefor periodendingJanuary 20, 2012 RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-018 17.Subject:ApprovedestructionofrecordsfromtheFinance,HumanResources,CityClerk, andParks&Recreation(SeniorCenter&Quinlan) departments RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-019 MahoneymovedandWongsecondedtoadoptResolutionNo.12-019withanamendmentto pulltheFinancerecordsfromthe1960’sandkeepthemforhistorical valueeitherin-house or givethemtotheCupertinoHistoricalSociety. Themotioncarried unanimously. 18.Subject:Annualadoption oftheCityInvestmentPolicy RecommendedAction:AdopttheCityInvestmentPolicy 19.Subject: Treasurer'sInvestmentandBudgetReportfor quarterendingDecember 2011 RecommendedAction:Acceptthereport 20.Subject: TreasurerandDeputy TreasurerAppointments RecommendedAction:AdoptResolutionNo. 12-020 21.Subject: MunicipalImprovements, 10056 OrangeAvenue RecommendedAction:Accept MunicipalImprovements Description:Theworkincludedsidewalk,curb&gutter,asphaltpavement,anddriveway approachimprovementsintheCityright-of-way 7 February 7, 2012CupertinoCityCouncilPage 4 SECONDREADINGOFORDINANCES 22.Subject:RezoningfromAgriculturalResidentialtoSingleFamilyResidential RecommendedAction:ConductsecondreadingofOrdinanceNo.12-2090,“AnOrdinance oftheCupertinoCityCouncilrezoningaportionofonelotanditsfrontinghalf-streetof 0.456acrefromA1-43(AgriculturalResidential)toR1-20(SingleFamilyResidential)and theremainingportionofthelotanditsfrontinghalf-streetof0.319acrefromR1-10(Single FamilyResidential)toR1-20(SingleFamilyResidential)locatedat11215MountCrest Place,APN 356-26-026” Description:Applications:Z-2011-04,EA-2011-13;Applicant:DarylFazekas(IsaacSegal); Location:11215MountCrestPlace,APN326-26-026,Noticing300ft;Environmental Declaration:NegativeDeclaration;Description:Rezoningapplicationtorezone approximately0.39acresfromAgriculturalResidential(A1-43)toSingleFamilyResidential (R1-20)andapproximately 0.30 acresfromR1-10toR1-20 ActingCityClerkGraceSchmidtreadthetitle ofthe ordinance. WongmovedandSinkssecondedtoreadtheordinancebytitleonlyandthattheCityClerk’s readingwouldconstitutethesecondreadingthereof.Ayes:Chang,Mahoney,Sinks,and Wong.Noes:None.Absent:Santoro. WongmovedandSinkssecondedtoenactOrdinanceNo.2090.Ayes:Chang,Mahoney, Sinks,andWong.Noes:None.Absent:Santoro. PUBLICHEARINGS 23.Subject:AnnualrenewalofbingopermitsforSt.JosephofCupertinoChurchandCupertino SeniorCenterCoordinatingCouncil RecommendedAction:Conduct public hearingandrenew permits ActingCityClerkGraceSchmidtreviewedthe staffreport. WongmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovetherenewalofthetwoannualbingo permits. Themotioncarried unanimously. ORDINANCESANDACTION ITEMS 24.Subject: Mid-year budgetadjustment RecommendedAction:Approvemid-year budgetadjustment FinanceDirectorDavidWooreviewedthe staffreport. KevinMcClelland,CupertinoChamberofCommerce,expressedsupportforfillingthe vacantEconomicDevelopmentManagerposition.Hesaidthatitwasimportanttohavea “pointperson”whocanworkwithhome-basedbusinesses,smallbusinesses,brokers,andthe communityfora successfuleconomyintheCity. 8 February 7, 2012CupertinoCityCouncilPage 5 WongmovedandMahoneysecondedtoapprovethemid-yearbudgetadjustmentas recommended by staff.Themotioncarried unanimously. 25.Subject:ContractfortheOnlinePermit TrackingSoftwareSystemforPermitReview RecommendedAction:AuthorizetheCityManagertoexecuteacontractwithComputer SoftwareIncorporated(CSI)MagnetsolutionandAvolveSoftwareCorporationforan OnlinePermitTrackingSoftwareSystemincludinglicensing,trainingandservicesinthe amountof$483,410.00forimplementationandadditionalannualmaintenanceforfiveyears perAttachmentAandanadditionalcontingencyintheamount of $16,590.00 CommunityDevelopmentDirectorAartiShrivastavareviewedthestaffreportandnotedthat anamendmenttothecontractwasaddedthatwouldallowathirdpartytoholdthesource codeinescrow shouldthecompanyexperiencefinancial hardshipsinthefuture. JenniferGriffinexpressedsupportforobtainingnewsoftware,butwasconcernedaboutthe cost.Shealsostatedthatthematrixreportrelatedtothedevelopmentpermitprocessfrom threeyearsagowasnotaccurate.SherequestedthatCouncilconsiderthisexpenditurevery carefully. WongmovedandMahoneysecondedtoauthorizetheCityManagertoexecutethecontract asrecommended by staff. Themotioncarried unanimously. Councilrecessedfrom 9:21 p.m.to 9:31 p.m. 26.Subject:AuthorizetheMayortosendalettertotheBayAreaAirQualityManagement District(BAAQMD)requestingthattheDistrictreconsiderthedesignationofLehighcement plant,sothattheplantwouldberegulatedinamannerappropriatetoaneworremodeled facility RecommendedAction:Provide directionto staff Publicand EnvironmentalAffairsDirectorRickKitsonreviewedthe staffreport. CouncilmemberSinksstatedthatalthoughhehasbeeninvolvedwithenvironmentalgroups, heiskeepinganopenmindonthesubjectandwouldbefairandimpartialtowardsall speakersandthecommunity.CouncilmemberChangalsonotedhewouldbefairand impartialaswell. CathyDiltsreadaletterfromJoyceM.Eden,aCupertinoresident.Theletterstatedthatthe areaaroundthecementplantisdenselypopulatedwith1.7millionpeopleandthatpollutants comefromtheplantaffectingtheyoung,theoldandpregnantwomen.SheurgedCouncilto writealettertoBAAQMDrequestingthatLehighoperateunderthenewsourcecriteriaof EPArules. TerryHertelshowedapictureoftheskyfromhisdeckshowingdustfromthecementplant. Healsoshowedhisfurnacefilterfromoneyearandnotedthatitisloadedwithpollutants 9 February 7, 2012CupertinoCityCouncilPage 6 fromtheplant.Inaddition,Mr.Hertelstatedthatdustfromthe plantalsogetsinto hisclothes overtime.HeofferedtoprovidedatahedownloadedfromaGooglesearchregardingthe pollutantsandrequestedthatCouncilincludethis datainalettertoBAAQMD. TimBrandsaidthathehasbeenanengineerfor34yearsandthatmeasurementsformercury contentandlimestonearevariable.HestatedthatBayAreaforCleanEnvironmenthireda consultantandforwardedtheresultsofthereporttoBAAQMD.Henotedthathereceived onlyoneresponsefromBAAQMDandbelievesthedatawastossedbecausetheresultswere too high. Mr.BrandrequestedthatCouncil sendalettertoBAAQMD. PaulaWallisexpressedconcernthatsparetheairdaysintheBayAreaarebecomingtoo common.ShenotedthattheBayAreaisanon-attainmentzonewhichmeansthattheair qualitydoesnotmeettheozoneorparticulatematterstandardsforhumanhealth.Ms.Wallis urgedcounciltosendalettertoBAAQMDtoholdLehightothehigheremissionsstandard of1.5poundsofNOxpertonofcementclinkerratherthantheproposed2.3poundsperton and .01 pounds of particulatematter perton ofcementclinkerratherthanthe proposed .04. GaryLatshaw,CupertinoresidentandmemberoftheSierraClub,saidhesupportedsending alettertoBAAQMDandprovidedadraftcopyofaletterhepreparedwithmorestringent language.Mr.LatshawindicatedthatthisletterwasnotbroughtbeforetheBoardofthe SierraClubLomaPrietaChapter. ThorstenvonSteinsaidhesupportedsendingalettertoBAAQMDurgingthemtohold LehightothestricteststandardsproposedbytheEPA.HenotedthatLehighisnationally uniquebecauseitcanoperatewheretherearepeopleandinaplacethatalreadyhassub- standardairquality.Mr.vonSteinreviewedan EPAanalysisthat showsthe newruleswould not only savelives butalsoreduce healthcarecosts. RichardAdlernotedthattherehasbeenconcernforyearsaboutthepollutionLehigh produces,buttherehasn’tbeenmuchrealdata.HestatedthatinAugustof2010theEPA releasedanationalhealthriskassessmentfromcementplantsandLehighisresponsiblefor 2%ofallcementplantpollutionnationally.Henotedthatbasedontheresultsofthe assessment,healthcarecostsavingsfromreducingparticulatematterwouldrangefrom$134 millionto$720millionperyear,casesofprematuredeathswouldbeatalowof19toahigh of100,andcasesofrespiratoryproblemswouldbereducedto600from1,200.Mr.Adler urgedCouncilto sendaletterrequestingLehigh be heldtothe strictest standards. KarenDelCompariorequestedthatCouncilsendalettertoBAAMQDrequestingthat Lehighbeheldtothestrictestcontrolsfornewormodifiedfacilities.Shealsoprovideda copyofaresolutionfromtheCaliforniaMedicalAssociationregardingmercuryandcement plant pollution. LynnFaustsaidshesupportedsendingalettertoBAAMQDandstatedthatshehopesthisis thefirst steptomakingCupertino’sair quality safer. 10 February 7, 2012CupertinoCityCouncilPage 7 JohnBartassaidthathebelievesLehighisamodifiedfacilityandthattheyshouldbeheldto thestandardsofanewlymodifiedfacility.Healsonotedthatairquality standardsare stricter inEuropebecausethemethodologiesusedbytheEPAarenotusedinEurope.Mr.Bartas urgedCouncilto sendalettertoBAAQMDto holdLehightothe strictest standards. MahoneymovedandSinkssecondedtoauthorizetheMayortosendalettertotheBayArea AirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD)withtheamendmentsasdiscussed.The motioncarried unanimously. REPORTSBYCOUNCILANDSTAFF Councilmembers highlightedtheactivities oftheircommitteesand variouscommunityevents. CouncilalsodirectedstafftoobtaininformationregardingtobaccoregulationinCupertinofrom theSheriff’sDepartmentandtoputtheresultsintheCityManager’sweeklynotes.Council concurredtoreviewtheresults beforeaddingtheitemtotheagenda. ADJOURNMENT At 11:00 p.m.,themeetingwasadjourned. ____________________________ GraceSchmidt,ActingCityClerk Staffreports,backupmaterials,anditemsdistributedattheCityCouncilmeetingareavailable forreviewattheCityClerk’sOffice,777-3223,andalsoontheInternetatwww.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas& Minutes,thenclick on theappropriatePacket. MostCouncilmeetingsareshownliveonComcastChannel26andAT&TU-verseChannel99 andareavailableatyourconvenienceatwww.cupertino.org.ClickonAgendas&Minutes,then clickArchivedWebcast.VideotapesareavailableattheCupertinoLibrary,ormaybepurchased fromtheCupertinoCityChannel, 777-2364. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408)777-3354www.cupertino.org CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting: February 21, 2012 Subject MunicipalImprovements, 21856 HermosaAvenue,APN 357-16-052. RecommendedAction Accept MunicipalImprovements. Discussion TheapplicanthascompletedCity-specifiedimprovementsintheCityright-of-wayincluding sidewalk,curb&gutter,anddrivewayapproachasrequired bytheimprovementagreementwith theCity. _____________________________________ Preparedby:Chad Mosley,AssociateCivil Engineer Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: A. Map 33 ATTACHMENTA . Subject:MunicipalImprovements,21856HermosaAvenue,APN357-16-052 RecommendedAction:AcceptMunicipalImprovements 34 PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408)777-3354www.cupertino.org CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting: February 21, 2012 Subject MunicipalImprovements, 22641 AlcaldeRoad,APN 342-29-036. RecommendedAction Accept MunicipalImprovements. Discussion TheapplicanthascompletedCity-specifiedimprovementsintheCityright-of-wayincluding sidewalk,curb&gutter,anddrivewayapproachasrequired bytheimprovementagreementwith theCity. _____________________________________ Preparedby:Chad Mosley,AssociateCivil Engineer Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: A. Map 35 ATTACHMENTA 22650 10530 22632 10535 10540 10554 10551 10566 10575 10583 10570 10 10595 10582 10591 10596 10584 10598 10588 . Subject:MunicipalImprovements,22641AlcaldeRoad,APN342-29-036 10600 10611 10590 10615 RecommendedAction:AcceptMunicipalImprovements 10620 10630 10634 36 10631 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408)777-3308www.cupertino.org CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting:March 21,2012 Subject PlanningCommission’srecommendationto selectMarty Millerasthe EnvironmentalReview Committeerepresentative RecommendedAction AcceptthePlanningCommission’srecommendationtothe EnvironmentalReviewCommittee. Description OnFebruary14,2012,thePlanningCommissionmadeitsannualrecommendationsforthe selectionofamembertotheEnvironmentalReviewCommittee(ERC).InaccordancewithCity ofCupertinoMunicipalCode,theCityCouncilshallreviewandaffirmtheselection.The recommendationis MartyMiller. _____________________________________ Preparedby:Beth Ebben,AdministrativeClerk Reviewedby:GaryChao,CityPlanner AartiShrivastava,CommunityDevelopmentDirector ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager 37 PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408)777-3354www.cupertino.org CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting: February 21, 2012 Subject OrdinancetoinstallbikelanesonRodriguesAvenuebetweenDeAnzaBoulevardandBlaney Avenue. RecommendedAction ConductsecondreadingandenactOrdinanceNo.12-2091:“AnOrdinanceoftheCityCouncil oftheCityofCupertinoAmendingSection11.08.250oftheCupertinoMunicipalCodeRelating toBicycleLanes-Designated;RodriguesAvenuebetweenDeAnzaBoulevardandBlaney Avenue.” Discussion OnJanuary 17, 2012, Councilconductedthefirstreading ofthe MunicipalCodeamendmentto establish bikelanes on RodriguesAvenuebetweenDeAnzaBoulevardandBlaneyAvenue. Councilalso directed stafftoreturntoCouncilinayeartoreport on the operational performance ofthe new striping on RodriguesAvenue. FiscalImpact ThecostofsigningandstripingisincorporatedintotheannualoperationalbudgetofPublic Worksstaff.ThecostofrestripingRodriguesAvenuetoaccommodatebikelanesisestimatedat $16,500andwillbeperformedbyanoutsidecontractor.SignagewillbecompletedbyCity forces. Thereis noadditionalfiscalimpactforthiswork. _____________________________________ Preparedby:DavidStillman,SeniorCivil Engineer Reviewedby: TimmBorden,Director ofPublicWorks ApprovedforSubmissionby:DavidW.Knapp,CityManager Attachments: A.DraftOrdinance 38 ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCENO.12-2091 ANORDINANCEOF THECITYCOUNCILOF THECITYOFCUPERTINO AMENDINGSECTION 11.08.250 OF THECUPERTINO MUNICIPALCODE RELATING TO ESTABLISHMENTOFBICYCLELANES; RODRIGUESAVENUEBETWEENDEANZABOULEVARDANDBLANEYAVENUE TheCityCounciloftheCityofCupertinodoesherebyordainthatSection11.08.250be amendedtoincludethefollowing: Section 11.08.250BicycleLanes-Designated. StreetDescriptionSide RodriguesAvenueDeAnzaBoulevardtoBlaneyAvenueBoth INTRODUCEDataregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityofCupertinothis _21_dayofFebruary,2012andENACTEDataregularmeetingoftheCityofCupertinothis___ dayof ____________, 2012bythefollowing vote: VoteMembers oftheCityCouncil AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST:APPROVED: _______________________________________ GraceSchmidt,ActingCityClerkMarkSantoro, Mayor 39 PARKSAND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 1010300TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408)777-3110www.cupertino.org CITYCOUNCILSTAFFREPORT Meeting: February 21, 2012 Subject Considerlocation(s)foran off-leashareafor dogs. RecommendedAction Considerlocation(s)foran off-leashareafor dogsandgive directionto staff. Background AtitsJuly 5, 2011 Councilmeeting,theCityCouncil discussed having staffreturntoCouncil with optionsforan off-leashareafor dogs.Staffindicatedthattheissuewouldreturninearly 2012. Theissue of off-leashareasfor dogsinCupertinowasfirstraisedin 1993. Themost recent discussions on thismatter beganin 2008.TheCouncilaskedtheParksandRecreation CommissiontoreviewtheissueandmakearecommendationtotheCouncil. TheParksand RecreationCommissionresearchedtheissue, visited neighboring dog parks,andconducted severalwell-attended,facilitated, public discussions. TheCommissionrecommendedtothe Councilthatthecommunityconversationcontinuewitha smallergroup ofinterested persons. Thisgroupmetfourteenconsecutiveweeks beforearrivingatacompromiserecommendation. Therecommendationwasafenced dog parkatthelowerlevel ofLindaVistaPark. WhentherecommendationwasforwardedtotheCouncil, neighborsfromtheLindaVistaarea vigorously opposedtheidea.Council votedto not builda dog parkatLindaVista.After listeningtothoseinfavor of off-leashareaswithoutafence,andthoseinfavor ofafencedoff- leasharea,theCouncilvotedtogetresidents’and park users’feedbacktoestablishan unfenced off-leashareafor dogsat specifictimes ofthedayinfourCity parks. TheparkswereJollyman, Library, Memorial,andLindaVista. TheCitycontractedwithGodbeandAssociatestoconduct a statistically valid surveyforresidentswithin 1,000feet ofthefour parksandto developa surveyto gatherinformationfrom park users.ADeAnzaCollege political scienceclass conductedthepark usersurveys duringthetime of dayproposedbytheCouncil. The surveys wereconducted overa30-day period. Theresults ofthe surveyshowedthatapproximately 25% oftheresidentswereinfavor of off- leashareasinthesefourparkswith 75% opposed. Theresults ofthe parkuser survey showed 49%infavorand 51%opposed.Staffalsoconsidered developingafenced-in off-leashareaat theCounty’sStevensCreekRegionalPark.However, dog owners preferredaCupertino neighborhood park.Councilasked stafftoevaluate possible sitesthatwerenotinCity parksfor afencedarea. 40 Staffevaluated various sitesandreturnedtoCouncilwitha site on City-ownedlandalong Mary Avenue.Staffalso hada designforafenced off-leashareafor small dogsandafencedareafor large dogs. Theestimated budgetforthis projectwas $250,000. Later, staff discoveredthatthe landinthis sitecontainedleadandwould needtobecleaned up foranadditionalcost of $100,000. The project did notgoforward duetothisadditionalcost. Analysis Giventhe discussionattheJuly 5, 2011 Councilmeeting, staff hasevaluated several possible siteswhicharepresented below. Uponfurtherevaluation,staffconsideredthree possible sites. The sitesand positivesand negatives ofeach sitefollow: 1)Buildafour-footfencearoundLibraryFieldwitharegulargate. MakeLibraryField availableasan off-leashareafor dogsfrom 7:00a.m. – 9:00a.m., Mondaythrough Friday. Therest oftheday,LibraryFieldwouldbefor permitted groups suchascricket, soccer,and volleyball. Positives:  Afencedfieldwill provideanareafor dogstorun off-leash, butwill notinterfere withthechildrenwalkingto Eaton ElementarySchooleachmorning.  Atime-certain off-leashareafor dogswillallowothersto usethefieldattheir usualtimes.  Afencedfieldwill keepcricket balls, soccerballs,and volleyballsfromrolling intothe street. Negatives:  Residentswithin 1,000 feet ofLibraryFieldwereopposedto havingan off-leash areafor dogs duringtheGodbe survey.However,thatwasforan unfenced off- leasharea.  Thereis no readilyavailablewaterfor dogsatthislocation.  This option does not provide separateareasforsmallandlarge dogs. Approximatecostforthisfenceandgateis $80,000. Thereis $250,000 intheCapital budgetfor dog parks. 2)Providean unfenced off-leashareafor dogsat MemorialParkfrom 7:00a.m. – 9:00a.m. MondaythroughFriday. Positives:  Thesetimeswill notinterferewiththe specialevents scheduledforMemorial Park. 41  Thesetimeswill notinterferewiththe permitteduse ofthe park.  The dogsmay beableto keepthegeeseawayfromthe park. Negatives:  Many studentsfromGardenGateandDeAnzawalkthroughthepark duringthis time.  Manypeoplearecurrentlywalkingthroughtheparkatthistime.  Theresults oftheGodbesurvey showedthatresidentswithin 1,000 feet ofthe parkwere strongly opposedtoan unfenced off-leashareafor dogs.  Thisalternative does notprovidefor separateareasfor smallandlarge dogs. Thecostisminimalastherewould benocapitalexpenditureandthe parkisalready maintainedbyPark Maintenance staff on aregular basis. AdditionalConsiderations The groundrulesforanoff-leasharea havealreadybeenestablishedbythecitizens’committee working on off-leashareasin 2008-2009.ItisalsorecommendedbyCitystaff,theABAGPlan staff,andtheSanJoseAnimalCareandServicesstaff,thata stronggroupof volunteers be developedto helpenforcetheserules.Iftheserulesarewellfollowedandenforced,additional impacttotheCity’smaintenanceservices should beminimal. The proposedgroundrulesare foundinAttachmentA. SustainabilityImpact N/A FiscalImpact Asindicatedabove,Council hasallocated $250,000fora dog parkinthecurrentfive-year Capital budget. Thecostforany ofthe possible sitesforan unleashedareafor dogsiswithinthis allocation. _____________________________________ Preparedby:MarkLinder,Director,ParksandRecreation Reviewedby:CityAttorneyandPublicWorksDepartment ApprovedforSubmissionby:AartiShrivastava,ActingCityManager Attachments:AttachmentA – GroundRulesbyCitizens’Committee 42 43 44 45