16 reconsider former any mountain
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
Fax: (408) 777-3333
CUPEI\TINO
Community Development
Department
Summary
Agenda Item No. ~
Agenda Date: October 17, 2006
SUBJECT
Consider a Petition for Reconsideration of the City Council's decision to approve
Application Nos. U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09 and EA-2006-09; Cliff Chang
(Chang Architecture), 10495 N. De Anza Blvd., APN 326-33-110 (former Any Mountain
building):
a) Use Permit and Architectural and Site Review to demolish an existing 27,000
square foot office building and construct a 60,000 square foot office building and
a parking structure,
b) Tree Removal and replanting for a proposed 60,000 square foot office building
and parking structure.
The petitioner is Jane Wu. The project is located on the southwest corner of North
De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council can take any of the following actions:
1) Uphold the petitioner's reconsideration request of U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06
and TR-2006-09 and deny the aforementioned applications;
Or
2) Deny the reconsideration by making required findings outlined by the City
Attorney.
Environmental Assessment:
Reuse Mitigated Negative Declaration
BACKGROUND:
On August 15,2006, the City Council heard the request to redevelop this property to a
new 60,000 square foot office building and remove a number of trees to allow the
development (Exhibit A). The petitioner, Mrs. Wu and related parties, attended the
hearing and testified as to their dissatisfaction with the site planning and design of the
1&- (
U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, EA-2006-09
Page 2
October 17, 2006
project, particularly the parking structure, which they felt would have negative impacts
on her acupuncture clinic business. The Council took in the testimony, deliberated at
length and approved the project with additional conditions of approval and a new
finding attached to the Planning Commission's resolutions of approval (Exhibit B).
1) The new finding was that the project is not unreasonably detrimental to the
adjacent property provided that the conditions of approval are met;
2) Traffic mitigation is capped at $25,000 subject to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works;
3) Delete condition #14 from the use permit and AS A, pertaining to consent of
adjacent property owner prior to issuance of building permits;
4) Levy lump sum sales-tax-in-lieu fee of $181,610 and cap it at this amount to
address general plan policy No. 2-42. Condition subject to any future
implementation of policy 2-42 that may allow for rebate or partial rebate of the
fee if office tenants are revenue generating; and
5) Design of garage is subject to review by the Design Review Committee with
Council direction to lessen the visual impact of the structure on the adjacent
office building (Mariani Business Center). This may include:
. Using a smaller footprint parking garage, such as the one approved by the
planning commission;
. Setting back the garage as far as possible from the rear property line
nearest the Mariani Business Center;
. Landscaping around the parking structure to soften the view of the
structure from the Mariani Business Center;
. Flipping the garage, so the less massive ramp is closer to the Center; and
. Lower garage height by depressing garage 1/2 level below grade.
DISCUSSION:
Subsequently, the project applicant applied for ASA for a revised garage design and
this application file no. ASA-2006-16 was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on
September 21, 2006 (Exhibit C). The redesign incorporated the Council directions and
provided additional improvements. The petitioner, Mrs. Wu, was pleased with the
redesigned garage and supported it at the DRC hearing. The DRC approved the ASA
on a 2-0 vote.
PETITIONER'S RECONSIDERA nON REQUEST:
The petitioner, Mrs. Wu, alleges flaws in the hearing process that prevented a full and
fair hearing of her concerns about the project (Exhibit D). The City Attorney has
responded to each point made by the petitioner in her reconsideration request (Exhibit
E).
ENCLOSURES
City Council Resolution
I~-l
U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, EA-2006-09
Page 3
October 17, 2006
Exhibit A: City Council Staff Report (w /0 attachments), dated August 15,2006
Exhibit B: City Council Action Letter dated August 22, 2006
Exhibit C: DRC Staff Report dated September 21, 2006
Exhibit D: Reconsideration Petition dated August 25, 2006
Exhibit E: City Council Findings in Response to Petition for Reconsideration
City Council August 15, 2006 Meeting Minutes
Plan Set for U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09
Plan Set for ASA-2006-16 (garage redesign)
Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Submitted by:
Approved by:
(~ P~~/c:r
Steve Piasecki '
Director, Community Development
~
David W. Knapp
City Manager
G:\Planning\ PDREPORT\ CC\ U-2006-06 reconsiderationl.doc
(~ -3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING THE
PETITION OF JANE WU SEEKING COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION OF ITS APPROVAL
OF APPLICATION NO. U-2006-06, A USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE, TO BE LOCATED AT 10495 N. DE ANZA
BLVD. IN CUPERTINO, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, AND EA-2006-09, A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
Whereas, Application No. U-2006-06, a use permit for the construction of an office building
and parking garage, to be located at 10495 N. De Anza Blvd. in Cupertino, ASA-2006-06, TR-
2006-09, and EA-2006-09, a mitigated negative declaration, was approved by the City Council
with conditions on August 15,2006; and
Whereas, Jane Wu has requested that the City Council reconsider its decision under the
provisions of section 2.08.096 of the City's ordinance code; and
Whereas, the City Council has considered all relevant evidence presented by the parties
at all hearings, including evidence presented at the October 17, 2006 reconsideration
hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The petitioner's Reconsideration Petition is defective on its face in that it does not offer
proof of facts as required by Municipal Code section 2.08.096.
2. The petitioner has made no offer of new relevant evidence that, in the exercise of
reasonable diligence, could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing. (See Municipal
Code 9 2.08.096B(1).)
3. The City Council did not exclude any evidence presented by the petitioners at any prior
city hearing. (See Municipal Code 92.08.096B(2).)
4. The City Council has proceeded entirely within its jurisdiction regarding the application
for a use permit. (See Municipal Code 9 2.08.096B(3).)
5. The petitioner has failed to present any evidence that the City Council failed to provide a
fair hearing. (See Municipal Code 9 2.08.096B(4).)
6. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the City Council abused its discretion
regarding the application. (See Municipal Code 9 2.08.096B(5).) Specifically, the City Council
determines that:
a. The City Council proceeded in a manner required by law.
b. The City Council's decision is supported by findings of fact.
c. The findings of fact related to the City Council's decision were supported by
substantial evidence in the record of proceedings.
(& -L(
7. The specific allegations contained in the petition for reconsideration are refuted by
specific City Council findings, which are attached to this resolution and incorporated herein.
8. The petitioner's Petition for Reconsideration of the City Council's determination of
August 15,2006 is DENIED
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this _ day of , 2006, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
(~ -~
Exhibit A
lUoUU lone 1-\ venue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
Fax: (408) 777-3333
CUPEI\TINO
Community Development
Department
Summary
Agenda Item No. _
Agenda Date: August 15, 2006
Application: U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09 (EA-2006-09)
Applicant: Cliff Chang, Chang Architecture
Property Owner: 1200 San Mateo A venue, LLC
Property Location: 10495 N. De Anza Boulevard (APN 326-33-110)
Application Summary:
USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL to demolish a 27,000 square
foot office building and construct a new 60,000 square foot office building with a two
level above grade parking structure.
TREE REMOVAL to allow the removal and replacement of 21 trees to accommodate a
60,000 square foot office building
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Planning Commission recommended:
1. Approval of the Negative Declaration, file number EA-2006-09;
2. Approval of the Use permit application, file number U-2006-06, in accordance with
Resolution No. 6403;
3. Approval of the Architectural and Site Approval, file no. ASA-2006-06, in
accordance with Resolution No. 6404; and
4. Approval of the Tree Removal request, file no. TR-2006-09, in accordance with
Resolution No. 6405.
Project Data:
General Plan Designation: Light Industrialj Commercial/ Residential
Existing Zoning Designation: P(CG, ML, Res 4-10)
Net Acres: 1.658 acres
Existing Office Building Area: 27,000 square feet (to be demolished)
Proposed Office Building Area: 60,000 square feet
Proposed Building Height/Stories: 45 feetj3 stories
Parking Required: 211 spaces
Parking Provided: 216 spaces
N. De Anza Blvd. Setback: 58' 7" - 107'
Mariani Ave. Setback: 37' average
1& -~
Applications: U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, EA-2006-U9
Page 2
August 15, 2006
Project Consistency with: General Plan ~ North De Anza Blvd. Zoning yes
Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration
BACKGROUND
On July 11, 2006, the Planning Commission considered an application packet to allow
the demolition of a 27,000 square foot office building and the construction of a new
60,000 square foot office building with a multiple level parking structure to the rear
(Exhibit A). The building was originally constructed for Any Mountain ski retailer in
1976, but was subsequently allowed to convert to office use in 1997 and was occupied
by Packeteer for several years before becoming vacant.
DISCUSSION
A number of significant project issues were identified during the Commission hearing
process:
Planning Commission Issues:
. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Negative Declaration, ASA
and Tree Removal request on 5-0 votes. The Use Permit was approved on a 4-0-1 vote
(Giefer abstained).
The ASA approval and use permit approval were based on the office project including
the revised parking structure design submitted by the applicant during the hearing
(Alternative A), which had a larger rear setback and one level of underground parking.
The Commission recommendations of approval included recommendations for:
. Traffic operational analysis.
. A requirement that the applicant obtain recorded written consent from the
adjacent property owner for the change in the parking configuration per the
reciprocal parking easement (See later staff discussion).
. The City Council to determine the level of compliance needed for General Plan
Policy 2-42, Revenue Analysis of the Office Development, which requires new office
developments greater than 50,000 square feet to provide revenue benefits to the
City (See later staff discussion).
Applicant Issues:
At the Commission hearing, the applicant submitted a revised parking structure design
that increased the rear setback from 3 feet to about 16 feet, and created one level of
underground parking. The previous design had three levels of parking above ground.
There were no revisions to the office building. This revised garage design is shown as
Exhibit A and is part of the Planning Commission recommendation of approval.
(~-I
Applications: U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, EA-2006-u9
Page 3
August IS, 2006
The applicant has verbally indicated to staff that it prefers its original parking structure
design that is part of the submitted plan set (no underground parking, 3-foot rear
setback) and desires Council consideration of that design.
Public Issues:
Five members of the public spoke about the project. Some expressed concerns about the
size of the building/ parking structure, which might create vacancies among the other
surrounding buildings, resulting in pressure to convert office buildings to housing.
Most were worried about additional traffic impacts to the area, particularly with the
existing congestion at Mariani Avenue and the N. De Anza Boulevard intersection
during the evening commute hours. One speaker suggested a new traffic light at
Bandley Drive and Mariani Avenue.
The adjacent office building/ property owner was concerned that she would have to
look out at the parking garage structure from her office window and felt the parking
structure was too close to her property. She provided the Commission and City
Attorney with a copy of a reciprocal parking and ingress/ egress easement that she
owned on the project site. She addressed a letter to the Planning Commission after the
hearing (Exhibit B).
StafjIssues:
Traffic. In his June 13, 2006 trip generation comparison report (Exhibit C), the traffic
consultant, Pang Engineers, concluded that the net increase in peak hour trips during
the AM peak hour (52 trips), and the PM peak hour (50 trips) created an insignificant.
impact on traffic. At the request of the Planning Commission, further traffic analysis
was completed to look at the operational aspects of the Mariani/N. De Anza
intersection, turning movement counts, traffic queues, and estimated trip distribution.
In his August I, 2006 report, which has already incorporated staff review and
comments (Exhibit D), Pang Engineers observed the operational problems ,of the
Mariani/N. De Anza intersection and made several recommendations and other
considerations to improve the intersection traffic flow.
1. Retain existing lane designations and striping.
2. Prohibit on-street parking on both the north and south sides of Mariani A venue
from Bandley Drive to N. De Anza Boulevard.
3. Increase the" green" time of the signal light controlling the eastbound left turn
movement on Mariani Avenue to northbound N. De Anza Blvd. to clear the
traffic.
Other considerations suggested by the traffic consultant are:
1& -~
Applications: U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, EA-2006-u~
Page 4
August 15, 2006
1. Add "Do Not Block Intersection" signs on all four approaches to the intersection.
Provide police enforcement during PM peak hours.
2. Consider prohibiting U-turn movements from southbound N. De Anza Blvd. at
Mariani A venue during the 4-7 p.m. peak period.
3. Provide more in-depth evaluation of the operation of the BJ's Restaurant
driveway on N. De Anza Blvd.
4. Upgrade the traffic signal controller cabinet for this intersection.
Staff is recommending these traffic improvements be included as a condition of
approval subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Parking Easement. The owner of the abutting property to the rear, Mariani Business
Center, LLC/Jane Wu, presented recorded easement language to the Commission that
indicates her legal interest in the parking and vehicular access of the applicant's
property (Exhibit B). Lik~wise, the applicant owns an easement for parking and access
on Mariani Business Center's property.
The easement language of concern reads as follows:
"... The owner of Parcel A and the owner of Parcel B, respectively, each may relocate
and reconfigure the parking spaces on their respective properties so long as same
remain reasonably accessible to the tenants, occupants, invitees, and guests of the other
parcel and so long as the number of spaces are not reduced below said number. Any
reconfiguration or reduction in number of spaces shall require the recorded written
consent of the owner of the other Parcel."
The situation appears similar to the one between Greg Bunker and the owners of
Yamagami Nursery and Mr. Bunker's attempts to redevelop his property. After
consulting with the Assistant City Attorney, the Planning Commission recommended
adding a development condition that tied development approval to the requirement of
obtaining recorded written consent from the adjacent property owner for the parking
reconfiguration. Planning staff prefers that the City not insert itself in this disagreement
between the two property owners over the easement language.
Conformance with General Plan Policy 2-42: Revenue Analysis of Office
Developments. This General Policy states that:
"In reviewing office development proposals, l;?ncourage office uses and activities that generate
significant revenues to the City, such as local sales offices, capturing point of sale internet
transactions and business to business tax revenues. New office development exceeding 50,000
square feet shall be approved only if one of these or similar benefits are provided."
As this is a speculative office development with no current prospective tenant, it is not
possible to perform this type of revenue analysis. The City Council has not discussed
how this policy would be implemented, and the Planning Commission requests that the
(~-(
Applications: U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, EA-2006-u':J
Page 5
August 15,2006
Council undertake this determination with respect to this 60,000 square foot office
building. The Director of Administrative Services is developing some alternative
strategies for implementing this policy. Her work is not completed yet to be included
in this staff report, but will follow shortly and be available before the hearing.
A separate minute order is enclosed, requesting that the City Council address this
policy on a general basis as well (Exhibit F).
ENCLOSURES
Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 6403, 6404 and 6405
Exhibit A: Planning Commission staff report dated July 11, 2006
Exhibit B: Letter to the Planning Commission from Jane Wu dated July 12, 2006
Exhibit C: Traffic Letter from Pang Engineers dated June 13, 2006
Exhibit D: Traffic Operations Report from Pang Engineers dated August 1, 2006
Exhibit E: Arborist Report from Barrie Coate dated June 6, 2006 (rec'd 7/24/06)
Exhibit F: Planning Commission Minute Order no. 6410
Plan Set
Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Submitted by:
Approved by:
~~r-6~'/~
w
Steve Piasecki
Director, Community Development
David W. Knapp
City Manager
G:\Planning\PDREPORT\ CC\ U-2006-06 CC Report.doc
I~-r()
Exhibit B
tifYOF
CUPEI\TINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3223
rAX: (4UlS) III-jjbb
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
August 22, 2006
Chang Architecture
Attn. Cliff Chang
156 Chapin Lane
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: Consider Application Nos. U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09 (EA-2006-09), Cliff
Chang (Chang Architecture), 10495 N. De Anza Blvd., APN: 326-33-110 (fonner Any
Mountain building):
a) Mitigated Negative Declaration
b) Use Permit and Architectural and Site Review to demolish an existing 27,000
square foot office building and construct a 60,000 square foot office building and
parking structure
c) Tree Removal and replanting for a proposed 60,000 square foot office building and
parking structure.
d) Minute Order regarding implementation of General Plan Policy 2-42 "Revenue
Analysis of Office Developments"
Dear Mr. Chang:
At its August 15, 2006 meeting, the Cupertino City Council approved the following: 1) Adopted a
Mitigated Negative Declaration; 2) Approved an additional finding that the project is not
unreasonably detrimental to the adjacent property provided that conditions of approval are met; 3)
Approved a Use Permit and Architectural and Site Review with the following conditions and
direction for the Design Review Committee:
.
Traffic mitigation is capped at $25,000 subject to the satisfaction of the
director of public works;
Delete condition No. 14 from the Use Permit and ASA, pertaining to
consent of adjacent property owner prior to issuance of building permits;
.
Printed on Recycled Paper
{~ -l/
U - 2006-06
2
August 22, 2006
. Levy lump sum.sales-tax-in-lieu fee of$181,610 and cap it at this amount
to address general plan policy No. 2-42. Condition subject to any future
implementation of policy 2-42 that may allow for rebate or partial rebate of
the fee if office tenants are revenue generating, for example;
· Design of garage is subject to review by the Design Review Committee
with Council direction to lessen the visual impact of the structure on the
adjacent office building (Mariani Business Center). This may include:
o Using a smaller footprint parking garage, such as the one approved
by the planning commission;
o Setting back the garage as far as possible from the rear property line
nearest the Mariani Business Center;
o Landscaping around the parking structure to soften the view of the
structure from the Mariani Business Center;
o Flipping the garage, so the les~ massive ramp is closer to the
Mariani Business Center; and
o Lower garage height by depressing garage l;i level below grade
Use Permit Conditions are as follows:
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on a plan set titled: " Any Mountain Office
Building" consisting of 13 sheets labeled: C, AI, A2, A2.1, A2.2, A3, A4, Cl through C-
5 and CLl, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Approval is granted to construct a 60,000 square foot office building with a 3-level
parking structure with one level below grade.
3. PARKING GARAGE
The approved garage site plan and floor plans are based on Exhibit A, subject to design
reVIew.
4. REVENUE ANALYSIS OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENTS
The City Council shall determine compliance with the General Plan Policy 2-42, Revenue
Analysis of the Office Development, which requires new office developments greater than
50,000 square feet to provide revenue benefits to the City.
(~ -f :l-
U-2006-06
3
August 22, 2006
5. BICYCLE PARKING
The applicant shall provide bicycle parking and bike racks for the proposed project in
accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino
Municipal Code.
6. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS
All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent
feasible subject to the Building Official approval. The applicant shall provide evidence
that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition pennits.
7. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
The applicant shall receive an allocation of 33,000 square feet of the office industrial
allocations for the North De Anza Boulevard Planning Area.
8. LANDSCAPE PLAN
The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building
pennits. The landscape plan shall include:
a) water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in confonnance with Chapter
14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in
Chapter 9.18, Stonnwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the
Cupertino Municipal Code.
b) Four 48" box Arbutus Marina trees in lieu of the 24" box trees proposed.
c) Landscaping where feasible to soften the appearance of the westerly side of the
parking structure.
9. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation require~ents, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020( d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
balTed from later challenging such exactions.
10. PUBLIC ART
The applicant shall install public art onsite prior to final occupancy. The public art shall
be valued at a minimum of one-quarter percent (1/4%) of the total project budget, not to
exceed $100,000. The applicant shall submit a public art plan to be reviewed by the Fine
Arts Commission prior to installation of the public art.
r~ -{ J
U-2006-06
4
August 22, 2006
11. SCREENING
All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so
they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening
materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening
shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen.
The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. No parking or
storage of materials shall be allowed under the protected trees.
12. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to the issuance of grading and demolition permits, the applicant shall enter into a
contract with an ISA-certified arborist to review and comment on all construction
drawings and monitor grading, demolition and building construction to ensure that the
recommendations described in an arborist report titled: "Tree Assessment and
Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project Proposed at 10495 North De Anza,
Cupertino, California, " prepared by Walter Levison and dated 5/12/06. Applicant shall
provide a copy of the contract to the Director of Community Development. No parking or
storage of materials shall be allowed under the protected trees.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist with
a confirmation letter sent to the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of
grading and demolition permits. The supervising arborist shall monitor construction
activities and prepare a final report ascertaining the health of the protected trees plior to
issuance of final occupancy.
13. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure
protection of the trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or
building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a
letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition.
14. APPROVAL OF PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION (Council deleted this
condition)
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
15. STREET WIDENING
Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and
specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVElVIENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with
grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
{~ -(Lf
U-2006-06
5
August 22, 2006
17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting
fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to
adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone
in which the site is located.
18. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire as needed.
19. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter
16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required.
Please contact Anny Corp of Engineers. and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as
appropriate.
20. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
21. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City as
needed.
22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance
No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall
coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The
developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans
shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino
providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees,
stonn drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said
agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Stann Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost: **
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
$ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or
$3,440.00 minimum
$ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,000.00
mInImUm
$ 1,000.00
$ 4,013.39
b. GradingPennit:
N/A
N/A
1& -- / )
U-2006-06
6
August 22, 2006
h. Street Tree
By Developer
**
Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the
City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of
recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or
changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
24. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transfonners, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures
shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said
equipment is not visible from public street areas. In addition the transfonner shall not be
located in the front or side building setback area.
25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in
your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be
provided.
26. STORMW A TER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
For a project creating or replacing one (1) acre or more of impervious surface, the applicant
must fulfill the City's storm water quality requirements, which includes but is not limited to
a Storm Water Management Plan/Notice of Intent (NOI), BMP operation and maintenance
responsibilities and BMP inspection and reporting.
27. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be
approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the
right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic
control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work.
The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for
all signage and striping work throughout the City.
28. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS
The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Department m
regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development.
i ~ -/(P
U-2006-06
7
August 22, 2006
29. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING
The applicant shall review traffic signal timing for the North De Anza Blvd.lMariani Avenue
intersection with the objective of improving safety for existing and expected pedestrian
movements.
Architectural and Site Review conditions are as follows:
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
pEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on a plan set titled: " Any Mountain Office
Building" consisting of 13 sheets labeled: C, AI, A2, A2.1, A2.2, A3, A4, C1 through C-
5 and CLl, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Approval is granted to construct a 60,000 square foot office building with a 3-level
parking structure with one level below grade.
3. PARKING GARAGE
The approved garage site plan and floor plans are based on Exhibit A, subject to design
reVIew.
4. REVENUE ANALYSIS OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENTS
The City Council shall determine compliance with the General Plan Policy 2-42, Revenue
Analysis of the Office Development, which 'requires new office developments greater than
50,000 square feet to provide revenue benefits to the City.
5. BICYCLE PARKING
The applicant shall provide bicycle parking and bike racks for the proposed project in
accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.1 00 of the CupeIiino
Municipal Code.
6. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS
All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent
feasible subject to the Building Official approval. The applicant shall provide evidence
that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition pennits.
7. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
The applicant shall receive an allocation of 33,000 square feet of the office industlial
allocations for the North De Anza Boulevard Planning Area.
(& ~/7
U-2006-06
8
August 22, 2006
8. LANDSCAPE PLAN
The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building
permits. The landscape plan shall include:
d) water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter
14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in
Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the
Cupertino Municipal Code.
e) Four 48" box Arbutus Marina trees in lieu of the 24" box trees proposed.
f) Landscaping where feasible to soften the appearance of the westerly side of the
parking structure.
9. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS.
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020( d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020( a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you 'Yill be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
10. PUBLIC ART
. The applicant shall install public art onsite prior to final occupancy. The public art shall
be valued at a minimum of one-quarter percent (114%) of the total project budget, not to
exceed $100,000. The applicant shall submit a public art plan to be reviewed by the Fine
Arts Commission prior to installation of the public art.
11. SCREENING
All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so
they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening
materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening
shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen.
The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
12. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to the issuance of grading and demolition permits, the applicant shall enter into a
contract with an ISA-certified arborist to review and comment on all construction
drawings and monitor grading, demolition and building construction to ensure that the
recommendations described in an arborist report titled: "Tree Assessment and
Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project Proposed at 10495 North De Anza,
Cupertino, California, " prepared by Walter Levison and dated 5/12/06. Applicant shall
tG-( J
U-2006-06
9
August 22, 2006
provide a copy of the contract to the Director of Conununity Development. No parking or
storage of materials shall be allowed under the protected trees.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist with
a confirmation letter sent to the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of
grading and demolition pennits. The supervising arborist shall monitor construction
activities and prepare a final report ascertaining the health of the protected trees prior to
issuance of final occupancy.
13. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure
protection of the trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or
building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a
letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition.
14. APPROVAL OF PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION (Council deleted this
condition)
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
15. STREET WIDENING
Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and
specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with
grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting
fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to
adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone
in which the site is located.
18. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire as needed.
19. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter
16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required.
Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as
appropriate.
20. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
(6 -( 1
U-2006-06
10
August 22, 2006
21. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new cOQ-struction to the approval of the City as
needed.
22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance
No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall
coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The
developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans
shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino
providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees,
storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said
agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Stonn Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost: **
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
$ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or
$3,440.00 minimum
$ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,000.00
mlmmum
$ 1,000.00
$ 4,013.39
b. Grading P ermi t:
N/A
N/A
By Developer
**
Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC
Bonds:
d.
e.
f.
Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the
City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of
recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or
changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
(~ ~ 20
U-2006-06
11
August 22, 2006
24. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures
shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said
equipment is not visible from public street areas. In addition the transformer shall not be
located in the front or side building setback area.
25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in
your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be
provided.
26. STORMW A TER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
For a project creating or replacing one (1) acre or more of impervious surface, the applicant
must fulfill the City's storm water quality requirements, which includes but is not limited to
a Storm Water Management PlanINotice ofIntent (NOl), BMP operation and maintenance
responsibilities and BMP inspection and reporting.
27. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be
approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the
right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic
control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work.
The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for
all signage and striping work throughout the City.
28. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS
The developer must obtain clearance from the Enviromnental Programs DepaIiment 111
regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development.
29. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING
The applicant shall review traffic signal timing for the North De Anza Blvd.lMariani A venue
intersection with the objective of improving safety for existing aIld expected pedestrian
movements.
1& ~ 2(
U-2006-06
12
August 22, 2006
Tree Removal conditions are as follows:
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. TREE REMOVAL
Approval is granted to remove 21 onsite trees as detailed in a plan set titled: " Any
Mountain Office Building" consisting of 13 sheets labeled: C, AI, A2, A2.1, A2.2, A3,
A4, C1 through c-s and CLl and an arborist repOli titled: "Tree Assessment and
Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project Proposed at 10495 North De Anza,
Cupertino, California, " prepared by Walter Levison and dated 5/12/06, except as may be
amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. Approval is not granted to
remove street trees in the public right-of-way.
2. LANDSCAPE PLAN
The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building
pennits. The landscape plan shall include:
g) water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter
14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in
Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the
Cupertino Municipal Code.
h) Four 48" box Arbutus Marina trees in lieu of the 24" box trees proposed.
i) Landscaping where feasible to soften the appearance of the westerly side of the
parking structure.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to the issuance of grading and demolition permits, the applicant shall enter into a
contract with an IS A-certified arborist to review and comment on all construction
drawings and monitor grading, demolition and building construction to ensure that the
recommendations described in an arborist report titled: "Tree Assessment and
Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project Proposed at 10495 North De Anza,
Cupertino, California, " prepared by Walter Levison and dated 5/12/06. Applicant shall
16 r- 21-
U-2006-06
13
August 22,2006
provide a copy of the contract to the Director of Community Development. No parking or
storage of materials shall be allowed under the protected trees.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist with
a confirmation letter sent to the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of
grading and demolition permits. The supervising arborist shall monitor construction
activities and prepare a final report ascertaining the health of the protected trees prior to
issuance of final occupancy.
TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure
protection of the trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or
building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a
letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition.
Any interested person, including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of the city
council's decision in this matter, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the city clerk
within ten days after the council's decision. Any petition so filed must comply with municipal
ordinance code S2. 08. 096.
Sincerely,
~
Grace Schmidt
Deputy City Clerk
cc: Community Development
Owner
1200 San Mateo Avenue, LLC
30 East Fourth Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94401
Mariani Business Center
Attn. Jane Wu
20600 Mariani Ave.
Cupertino, CA 95014
Attorneys
Petitioners
(~- 23
Exhibit C
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
. Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Application: ASA-2006-16
10495 North De Anza Blvd.
Date: September 21, 2006
===========~========================================================
Project Description: Architectural and site review of a revised 3-level parking garage
design for an approved 60,000 square foot, 3-story office building at 10495 North De
Anza Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of file no. ASA-2006-16 per the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
On August 15, 2006, the City Council approved a use permit and ASA for a 3-story,
60,000 square foot office building with parking structure to be located at 10495 N. De
Anza Blvd. In its conditions of approval, the City Council directed the applicant to seek
ASA approval through the DRC for the final design of the parking structure as its mass
and location had negative visual impacts on the adjacent office building (Mariani
Business Center) toward the rear. The Council provided design direction for the garage
using the Commission-recommended parking structure as a reference point (Exhibit A).
The DRC may include the following items in its considerations:
1) Use a smaller footprint parking garage, such as the one recommended for
approval by the Planning Commission;
2) Setting back the garage as far as possible from the rear property line nearest the
Mariani Business Center (MBC);
3) Landscaping around the parking structure to soften the view of the structure
from the Mariani Business Center;
4) Flipping the garage, so the less massive ramp is closer to the Mariani Business
Center; and
5) Lower garage height by depressing garageV2level below grade (Council did not
favor under grounding the parking).
DISCUSSION:
The key consideration is creating as wide a separation between the Mariani Business
Center (labeled "OFFICE" on the plan set) and the parking structure. The adjacent
property owner was concerned about the garage mass looming over her building and
the openness of her view from her ground level office.
The project architect has accomplished this by contracting the garage footprint on the
north side and notching the parking structure near MBC. While the parking structure is
predominantly set back 10 feet from the property line, it increases to 30+ feet near MBC.
The quantity of parking provided, 214 spaces, meets the City parking requirement of
211 parking spaces.
1(0.-2. Lf
September 21, 2006
ASA-2006-16
Page 2
Staff did not agree with the design concept of placing the less massive garage ramp near
MBC because of the frequency of vehicular noise, glare and exhaust that would impinge
upon the MBC occupants. The internalized ramping system is a much better solution
for MBC. The ramps are set even further back from MBC and are buffered by the
intervening driveway aisles, parking and landscaping.
The project architect also created a split level design to present a shorter structure
(23'6") toward MBC and the taller structure (28'6") facing the new, approved office
building.
The landscaping design is not well-developed yet, so staff requests that DRC direct staff
to work with the applicant during the building permit phase to improve the amount of
landscaping. The proposed landscape margins are only five feet wide, which could
accommodate tall plants like bamboo or Italian Cypress, which is needed to soften the
appearance of the building.
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Colin Jung, Senior Planner c:.t
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Exhibit A: Planning Commission recommended parking structure design
Plan Set
G:\Plamung\DRC\staff rep\2006\ASA-2006-16 SR.doc
(~ -2.)
ASA-2006-16
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROV AL FOR A REVISED PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN
FOR AN APPROVED 60,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AT 10495 NORTH DE ANZA
BOULEVARD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2006-16
Cliff Chang
10495 North De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the Design Review Committee to review the design
of a parking structure for an approved office building project;
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided design direction to the Design Review Committee
that it may use to improve the design of the structure and its spatial relationships to the
adjacent office building, known as the Mariani Business Center;
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee has reviewed the revised garage design;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the Design Review Committee approves the architectural and site
approval, file no. ASA-2006-16, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this
Resolution.
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2006-16
set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, September 21, 2006, and
are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the plan set titled: "Any Mountain Office Building, Site Plan
(Scheme B)", consisting of three pages labeled A1, A2.2 and A2.3 and dated 8/28/06,
except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
( ~-lfo
Resolution No.
Page 2
ASA-2006-16
September 21, 2006
2. LANDSCAPING
Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping plan
subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development.
3. LIGHTING
Any parking structure lighting shall be designed to not cast glare onto adjacent
properties.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of September 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Ciddy Wordell,
City Planner
Lisa Giefer, Chair
Design Review Committee
G: IPlanning\DRClres\2006\ASA-2006-16 res. doc
(& - 2)
-:::= ANDREW Q. I" U Ph.D., L.Ac
-= CertijiedA cupuncturist
- Prof of TiM Jin T.CM. College, China
Ph.D. of American Global University
President of A WTM
Exhibit 0
LicenseNo.:Ac 3712
~1Err:IEH/IE~
~ul AUG 2 5 moo j~
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
Jane Wu
Mariani Business Center LLC
20600 Mariani Ave.
Cupertino CA, 95014
August 25,2006
Dear City Council Members,
As of 8-25-06 noon we received a fax from Sand Hill Properties addressing our first
item of appeal. Their response is not satisfactory and although they assume that our
request is based on our acceptance of the consent to the Amendment to Declaration and
Grant of Reciprocal Parking Easement sent to us back in July 2006, this is not an accurate
assumption on Sand Hill's part. We are not now in a position to sign. We still need to
negotiate changes for what has been presented today is not completely acceptable. Please
take this under advisement as you read our appeal. Thank you for your time and efforts
in this matter.
Sincerely,
~~ 1~V\
JaneWu
20600 Mariani Ave. . Cupertino,CA95014 . Tel: (408)257-3767 . Fax: (408)257-3825
1& - LJ
,
,
Jane Wu
Mariani Business Center LLC
20600 Mariani Ave.
Cupertino CA, 95014
f5) [E (c; lE ~ \Y! [E IRI
U\l AUG 2 5 2006 lW
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
August 24, 2006
Appeal for U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09 (EA-2006-09), APN: 326-33-110
Dear City Council Members,
This letter serves as a written appeal for the decision concerning the proposed Any
Mountain Building. The grounds for reconsideration ate outlined below:
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence,
could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing.
After the proposed building was passed, it was brought up by
Commissioners Kwok and Wang that Peter Pau should continue negotiations with
the Mariani Business Center. Since Friday, August 17th, repeated attempts have
been made to contact Peter and Sand Hill Property. Up to this day, they have failed
to respond to our phone calls or send a representative to discuss the changes in the
parking lot design.
I believe this serves as new evidence showing that PeterPau has no interest
in continuing negotiations with Mariani Business Center. We would like to come to
an amenable solution with the new proposed design for the garage, however, with
no contact from Peter, we are unable to create a solution. I would like the City to
reconsider their approval of the building and add a condition that both parties must
agree on the [mal design for the parking garage.
4. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair
( ~ - 27
if,
i'
hearing.
At the hearing, the Council determined the new project was not
"unreasonably detrimental to the adjacent property owner." However, I felt that I
was not adequately able to present my case in front of the City Council. First of all,
our representative, Sful1 \Vu, was not able to present l:-tis entire conversation before
the City Council dismissed him. There were many key points in his presentation
that he was unable to present to the City Council.
Secondly, when Mayor Lowenthal was making his determination, he stated
that "it was nota parking issue", and therefore, the easement would not have to be
obeyed. We were not given a chance to respond. Ifthis building were to be built
according to plan, it would defmitely affect our parking rights by affecting how our
patients would access the building and, ultimately, determining where they would
park. I felt we were not given the opportunity for a full and fair hearing
Our acupuncture clinic adds great value to the city through tax revenue and the medical
care we provide to the community. I support the redevelopment of the building next door
and I hope to continue negotiations with our new neighbor and the City Planning
Department. However, we need the help of the City Council to balance the interests of both
the new residents and the current residents to make sure the end result is beneficial to all
parties.
Sincerely,
~ '----.LN \A
~~u
Mariani Business Center
(~- ]6
Exhibit E
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS IN RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section 19.124.070 a conditional use permit may
be granted where the decision maker makes the following findings:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title.
In granting the use permit application U-2006-06 (Chang Architecture, former
Any Mountain building), the City Council finds: a. that the use was in accord with the
Cupertino General Plan Land Use Map; and, b. that the use of the subject property will
not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience.
Municipal Code section 2.08.096 states:
"A petition for reconsideration shall specify, in detail, each and every ground for
reconsideration. Failure of a petition to specify any particular ground or grounds for
consideration, precludes that particular omitted ground or grounds from being raised or
litigated in a subsequent judicial proceeding.
The grounds for reconsideration are limited to the following:
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence,
could not have been produced at any earlier city h.earing.
2. An offer ofrelevant evidence which was improperly excluded at any prior city
hearing.
3. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council proceeded without, or in
excess of its jurisdiction.
4. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair hearing.
5. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City the City Council abused its discretion
by:
a. Not proceeding in a manner required by law; and/or
b. Rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact; and/or
c. Rendering a decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the
evidence."
A petition for reconsideration of Application No. U-2006-06, a use permit for the
construction of an office building and parking garage, to be located at 10495 N. De Anza
Blvd. in Cupertino, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, and EA-2006-09, a mitigated negative
declaration, was submitted by Jane Wu on August 25, 2006.
FINDINGS
Ms. Wu's Petition for Reconsideration make the following assertions:
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which in the exercise of reasonable diligence could
not have been produced at any earlier city hearing:
1 {~-J{
WU PETITION FINDING
"After the proposed building was passed, it The comment by the two council members
was brought up by Commissioners K wok is irrelevant. Since the vote was already
and Wang that Peter Pau should continue taken, this did not constitute a directive
negotiations with the Mariani Business from the City Council and was not a part of
Center." the Council resolution. It was given in the
spirit of encouraging good neighborliness.
Response: The irrelevant comment by the two council members is not new relevant
evidence.
2. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair hearing.
WU PETITION FINDING
". .. our representative, Sam Wu, was not To provide fair and equitable hearing, all
able to present his entire conversation members of the public are allotted the same
before the City Council dismissed him. amount of time to address the Council. In
There were many key points in his addition to Mr. Wu, the Council also heard
presentation that he was unable to present from Judith Rentschler, attorney for the
to the City Council." Mariani Business Center. Additionally, the
Council received and considered Mr. Wu's
letter of August 15,2006, which outlined
his key points and Ms. Rentschler's letter
of August 14,2006.
Mayor Lowenthal "stated that 'it was not a This is an incorrect paraphrase of Mr.
parking issue,' and therefore, the easement Lowenthal's statement. In fact, after Mr.
would not have to be obeyed. .. .If this Wu's presentation Mr. Lowenthal asked if
building were to be built according to plan, his two issues were 1) inequity of use of
it would definitely affect our parking rights the driveway and 2)> safety of the clients.
by affecting how ourpatients would access Mr. Wu added his concern that the building
the building and, ultimately, determining would block the view. After public input,
where they would park." Mr. Lowenthal stated," I didn't hear any
issue on parking itself. I think there are
design issues."
Response: The hearing was fair and the Council received and considered Mr. Wu's
evidence.
CONCLUSION
The petition for reconsideration did not comply with Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 in
that the petition did not meet the requirements by offering any of the following:
2 I ~- 32...
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence,
could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing.
2. An offer of relevant evidence which was improperly excluded at any prior city
hearing.
3. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council proceeded without, or in
excess of its jurisdiction.
4. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair hearing.
5. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City the City Council abused its discretion
by:
a. Not proceeding in a manner required by law; and/or
b. Rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact; and/or
c. Rendering a decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the
evidence. "
In addition the Council finds that with the conditions imposed by the Council:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title.
In reviewing the Petition filed by Jane Wu to Reconsider the Council's decision to grant
the applications as noted in detail above, the City Council finds that there is no relevant
evidence or proof of facts that support any of the grounds for reconsideration as required
by Cupertino Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 B. 1-5.
3 (~ -]3
August 15, 2006
- Cupertino City Council
Page 7
.
The Planning Commission should hear issues regarding the illegal cutting of trees
Keep approvals at the staff level as much as possible, but do 300 foot noticing
3. Pena .es:
. For .vil penalties, the person should replace the tree and pay a fine
. The Cit Council can modify the penalty on an appeal
. Compare p alties of other cities
. The penalty sh ld increase as each offense occurs
. Anyone who remo s a tree in violation would need to apply for an after the fact
permit and come befo the Council for conditions to be placed on the restitution
. After the fact permits are iolation and should cost more
. Any pending applications wo ' be finalized until there is an approval of an after
t~e fact permit
. The location, size, and how long one s to replace a tree is important
4. Noticing:
· 300 feet for staff or Planning Commission
. Put the notice on the tree itself during the appeal ti
5. Solar panels:
· No amendment
{
Other Council comments included:
. Look into the idea of transplanting trees from mature landscape areas to
the City that are tree deficient
. Look into whether the ordinance should outline tree protection
construction
18. Consider Application Nos. U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09 (EA-2006-09), Cliff
Chang (Chang Architecture), 10495 N. De Anza Blvd., APN: 326-33-110 (former Any
~
Mountain building):
a) Mitigated Negative Declaration
b) Use Permit and Architectural and Site Review to demolish an existing 27,000
square foot office building and construct a 60,000 square foot office building and
parking structure
c) Tree Removal and replanting for a proposed 60,000 square foot office building
and parking structure.
d) Minute Order regarding implementation of General Plan Policy 2-42 "Revenue
Analysis of Office Developments"
((;-J1
August 15,2006
Cupertino City Council
Page 8
Senior Planner Colin Jung reviewed the staff report VIa a PowerPoint
presentation.
Applicant Peter Pau discussed the project highlighting the garage plan, the
landscape plan, the parking agreement with the neighbor (Mariani property), and
mitigating traffic concerns.
Architect Cliff Chang reviewed the project and clarified the parking scheme.
Jennifer Griffin said she liked the look of the building and is glad they want to
keep the trees. She said she thinks the building is too big for the property, and that
it would be preferable to have the parking garage completely under the building.
She said she was concerned about the building taking excess of office in this area,
and shared concerns about the possibility of housing coming in the future.
Sam Wu, co-owner of the Mariani Business Center, said he is not against the
development but against the proposed plans. He said the project looks overbuilt,
making the two pieces of land inequitable regarding access. He shared concerns
regarding the patient walkway posing a safety hazard, and traffic issues. He
submitted a petition from local businesses against the proposed development.
Judith Rentschler, representing the owners of the Mariani Business Center, said
that she supports the Planning Commission's recommendation that the project not
be voted on until the parking and easement issues are resolved between the two
property owners. She commented that the building is too big for the lot and
devalues the Mariani property behind. She noted that the conditional use permit
must make a finding that the project isn't injurious to the adjacent property.
Lydia Song said that the building and the parking garage are huge compared to the
small office development. She noted that it would be more pleasing if the garage
were to be completely underneath.
Suggested flipping the parking garage so that the outside ramp would be on the
side allowing the other property to still see through.
Kwok/Sandoval moved and seconded to: 1) adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration; 2) approve an additional finding that the project is not unreasonably
detrimental to the adjacent property provided that conditions of approval are met;
3) approve a Use Permit and Architectural and Site Review with the following
conditions and direction for the Design Review Committee:
. Traffic mitigation is capped at $25,000 subject to the satisfaction of the
director of public works;
. Delete condition No. 14 from the Use Permit and ASA, pertaining to
consent of adjacent property owner prior to issuance of building permits;
. Levy lump sum sa1es-tax-in-1ieu fee of$181,610 and cap it at this amount
to address general plan policy No. 2-42. Condition subject to any future
r&- ])
August 15,2006
Cupertino City Council
Page 9
.
implementation of policy 2-42 that may allow for rebate or partial rebate
of the fee if office tenants are revenue generating, for example;
Design of garage is subject to review by the Design Review Committee
with Council direction to lessen the visual impact of the structure on the
adjacent office building (Mariani Business Center). This may include:
o Using a smaller footprint parking garage, such as the one approved
by the planning commission;
o Setting back the garage as far as possible from the rear property
line nearest the Mariani Business Center;
o Landscaping around the parking structure to soften the view of the
structure from the Mariani Business Center;
o Flipping the garage, so the less massive ramp is closer to the
Mariani Business Center; and .
o Lower garage height by depressing garage Y2 level below grade
The motion carried unanimously with Mahoney absent.
Development), 10114 Crescent Court, APN Nos. 326-17-009 and 326-17-030:
Negative Declaration
(
b)
ative Map to subdivide a 2A-acre property into five parcels, with parcel sizes
greate an 10,000 square feet, and an approximately 35,000 square foot parcel
for creek cation
20.
under postponements.
City Manager David Knapp noted the im rtance of the Annual Report for historical
purposes. The Council concurred to accept the. art.
ORDINANCES - None
ST AFF REPORTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Sandoval noted that on Sunday, October 1, the public is invited to attend a . d
It Green Home Tour, sponsored by Santa Clara County and the City of Cupertino. To sign up,
f & - 3b
MABJANI AVENUE 1-=--__- I
RELOCATE REMOVE (E) -<::, ~
REDUCEDSETBACK 24'r(E) ACCESS RFl.OCATE ~ REMOVE (E) ENTRY + REPlACE d
FROM 15'TO 10', / jENlRY / ~~ SIDEWALK\ ~ WALKW~,:(-\ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - I
~\ / \: J / u ~ ~. :,;.. !lJ!'" _________-.D --~} / .~- / : \ " ~ I
.~ --r ~ -"ll- ,..... r=-__ - --' :.1.li ..;):~ -r-Drn" f~>::::::::-..~ ~ < ~ I' REJr... /.;-......!~,..'i...{,-. .,T\:'"
11/ ,/-----------,;-,~-.-:..:::.;::.;;;-- !!__I'tE_'_'''' k I -'. -1----- -.~~-::~t.- - -- _.+~- -+-'-(6""711~,,' I -------~6 - ---- , . - , '. ,
{ - - . - """'c:a -r '- I' -I 1 1 'f~"' .~ '. - ~~~+~t>\~ 'it! I Allf'.' IGD3
i (<) .rAW C' . -,.. ~ __ ~ · 50 ST~ /': .. . · . · t;,~~ ~ ,}/} /f ! i ! i li'y~ d
: OFFICE ___~_~_ k 61' -- _.>.-.:i~-_1fl_cl . V ".--I-'~'~~'::"~'; ::::.: "I I I
\1 ~ (~I :. ~~_rf:_- bsf~CE:s-JENTs- -: - I j: ~~ C~. ~ '.:~: ;.<;. \.~:.f ~ i i i
~ r - :o~ - · · '~~~~L :1:\ (' ~ I I i
~l~;;-' .\ _ ] R8,=~. : , ;",,~ ~. ....~.I.:.' '. ~:::
,oj.;. . ~ _ ; ~-'C-"' "He ,; , ~I:r ~:::
I : --L I 49' 4" WI - . :81::"""'1 1: I' ,I I
<> I! .. ':-:-:-:I~'; ~ I
t- L ( \ ..;.:-:-:-tt:-.'-.-I ':: I I I
L__~2 -, 20 srn.LS 20 STms \ .' \ ~> "~~~~f:::::: ;11 I I
I I' ~. ,,\ l " "\~i>': I I I
: _ ~ -.- _ J--- \ "7 ""\.~ 1<-:. I II " I,
: : rr 2 co !l'~ I J \ ~ "i
~lil ,J<--V I:!mn-r- ~ y_. ., . ~\:::~ I I I I
I I L '\. - ~~~ ~ T--I----~-~l-l-=--~~_il--"-=J~~7:- ~ I I I
\m>>---\\mr\\1'~'-' .... '''-''''\f' ~'::r '"."~' V..."" l\i,'" I:;'ASH~"'" ....... ,,'ASH ....... ,.....:'..~~~.: j I I
~ 117 ~, }ll 1fr m' ~sr ~?I t;J:W- I I I
!\.~ I I~
~ .......,...- I I \ I I I
I I I I I I
GENERAL
SITE AREA: 41 SF
,..658 ACRES)
DE NoIZA REQ'O SEIIIACk: 50'
CONSlRUCTlON 1'tPE: V-I HOUR
1lASJC: 14,000 SF
IIULl1-STOR'f: 28,000 SF
SPRN<I.EREIl: 545,000 SF
2 S1DE-YARIlS; 84,000 SF
(AU.OWABl.E)
OCCUPANCY; B (0FFlCE)
I
P~avAL
I
I
C l
I
I
n twLe
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~_i'")^^, -1/"
Application Number
q-;)I-dt~
e-e.. Date .
~.
STATS
BUlG. ARCk
FLOORS:
FAR:
PARKING
REQ'D:
OFFICE
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
60,000 SF (20.ooo/FUl)
3
JI3
211 STALl.S (3.5/1000 SF)
(1 PER 2B:i sn
ROOI'HEJGIt:207.2
OFFICE
PROPOSE\):
"T CRAllE 60 STALLS
smucr. 164 STALLS
PRllPOSEIl: 214 STALLS (3.6/1000 SF)
PARKtlG STRUCr. ARE"A: 55,740 SF
ROC:FHElCIIT:2f7.1
.=-
_t4/IIO
~~
f:=:=
.. .........~.M.An.ocII
Rev,
De
Dale By
IE
if
~
Any Mountain
Office Building
G) SITE PLAN
A1
SCAlE: '"=20'
Cupertino, CA
r-:::.------;::r.-,
~~~~::~;"'J
Drawing TIIlB:
SITE PLAN
(SCHEME B)
......-
,
"
"'~~""
"
........................
.....
IS' ....
Job.
Date:
Sollie:
Drawn By:
Sheet:
---
""'"
---
---
---
-----2"2-srw
GAIlAGEl 104 SPACES
G;) SITE SECTION
A1
1t~
SCALE: 1"=20'
A1
__Inc.
~
APPROVAL
4~ - e9..o0(P - i /"
. Application Number
q - ;;)../- ~~
~ ~ Date
ORe
Signature
3-L
EL 20'-0
..
I
;.,
CONe. COLUMN
(P1>
RAMP
BEHIND
'b
OPEN
---
'b
-
P
in
~ SOUTH ELEVATION
~ -=- -=- ~--.l_
LEVEL B
EL -5'-0.
________.---J
SCALE: 1/8"-1'--0"
STAINLESS STEEL
CABLES FOR VINES
ACCENT
COLOR (P2)
STEEL
STAIR (P2)
10
I LEVEL 3= U +
;.,
EL 25'-0.
'b
iD LEVEL 2-U +
I EL. 15'-0.
10
'"
~
LEVEL 1-U +
EL 5'-0.
in
in
L L ----.J .,
tt...,,,.,... t - - - - - - ~ EAST ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
a SCAlE: '/8".1'-0.
LEVEL B +
EL -5'-0.
ACCENT COLOR
(P2)
CONe. GUARPRAlL
RECESSED
-+ L.ElIEL:5 U.
EL 25'-0
lD
I
i'l
lD
I
i'l
b
OPEN
--
.do LEVEL 2-U :.,
T EL 15'-0" .'
re
---
.
If)
I
...., LEVEL 2-L
EL 10'-0
b
SH
+ LEVEL 1-U
EL 5'-0"
b
ig
---
+ I.EVEl. B
EL. -5'-0"
L____-_____L___.---J
Q;) NORTH ELEVATION
St:AlL: 1/8".,'-0"
SET BACK
DECK BEYOND
COLOR (P2)
GUARDRAIL (PO
LEVEL 1-L
EL 0-0
L____________________________________J
Q WEST ELEVATION
SCN.f: 1/8"."-0"
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
Rev. Des .
MlCH. IlUlCl. AIlIIEf
lIDlllII~
= RE\lSION
Date By
3128/011
49
5
B/2lII08
ny Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
DrawIng TIlle;
GARAGE
ELEVA liONS
A2.3
~
by 0IIIlg ArdI-" I1Ic.
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
~
IIuIfnPle r... _1
~_o ____-
ANY MOUNTAIN OFFICE BUILDING
Planning Submittal
April 26th, 2006
May 26th, 2006 (Revised per City comments)
10495 North De Anza Blvd., Cupertino, CA
APN: 326-33-110
Sf-}-;?ato -f!)b
APPROVAl. U - :J.rtip-~, .,e- '(Po-o9
A....- ........
Plant';", Ctmrm!ssiml 7 - /1- 0?CJCf>
lI.l.
Cif)' Cotmdl B,- /5-;(a::t,
Signature , ,
INDex
C COVER
A1 SITE PLAN
A2 OFFICE FLOOR PLANS
A2.1 OFFICE FLOOR PLANS
A2.2 PARKING FLOOR PLANS
A3 ELEVATIONS
A4 ELEVATIONS
C1 TITLE SHEET
C2 PRELIMINARY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C4 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C5 CITY OF CUPERTINO BMP
L 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN
G-r~
, I
i ~I
I I,
I . ,
I ~I
~.~'
10
I I
10
I'")
l'r
~I 0
I I'")
"v!
r--
15'
Ig
I
i 'r I I
I gl I
I ,
0-t .-{---
I ~I
G-W
J4SA- - ~a1o -oft> rR-~
PPROYAI. JA "'::Jak-ot,
"...... .......
annln, Commlssl:m 7-1/-;/oci:J
Ihl.
0' COlmcll_0 - J5 - d{)G;
...
ignaiure
I I I I I
+-45'={)- .=- - l "L l' -0:-1___ 40~-a-~t_"Lt>' ..::o-__~
E 2v (1 G G
-oct
G;) 1 ST FLOOR PLAN
ENTRY
LOBBY
10 -'f<----T-
\.J I ;
I I
1;1
I ~I
cv+-+--
I . I
I <j'1
I '0
I 1'")1
G I -l---
I I I
I 'T/1 i
;,' g I
V,
G4-
I 0
I~
I II 'I
= '1:;:';= =
-
BROW
ABOVE
I
- I
I ~I
, I
Gto'
I !
I ~
I
I
- '-IjJ-- -
I
i
G--
SCALE: 1/16"= l' -0"
I
I
----*----
I 'I
- -
F1 - --- =-t"Ll' 0- I ----"O~ n"--_~I '''~
' --=------"-- G _...:c-t- -2._:V___~_. '''-=''- .
7
II
BROW
BELOW
I
@ 2ND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
CHANG
ARCIllTECTURE
Rev. Descri .
ARCH. '1lUlG. RE\IIEW
Df:SIGN ~Al.
DESIGN _
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Title
OFFICE
FLOOR PLANS
Job #
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
3/29/06
AS N01EO
A2
^~_....~. - .... ---- ......!I.......- '..
TRASH
fREe.
IT: :~111
.--- .._ _u .... I
I
,
,
rr-\l 10 . .n
_.-----..-- - ,I 17'-0- Ll 25"-'- l 25' ~~~-^J I
J4 III! ---- I
-_. -- I 92 STALLS I:, I
I
I i:I I
Irr..,. 1.'-0- ,....,. 22'-0- ,.'-cr 18'-0"' --,j< I
i _... .-.. ~ J I
, r h , n I q
-.. -'-- I HC I
I - I
- I ~I I
II:, I
, I
l~ HC
I I =i I
_. -- "-" - 1 (j
I J i HC I
101 I
L.-=l--f I
110, ~I I
.-- .-- 74
=1 I
-.-."- --. -- I HC I
I 9
I
I I
I I I
I j I
" il I
r if 9 I
- --.- _c_ 8 9 I
u r 12 10 q
- -- -- - 1'1 EDGE OF I
I~ GARAGE I
I
- - --- W-- DECK 101 I
I ~ ABOVE RAMP ~_I I
- . -~ --. - I ;--ABOVE I
I
.-- --- L. -- .~ t- --
V I I
, - . -- . - .. ..,. \ I
6 / ,
./
~ \ ..... 3
~ r /
\ /1
I. " "'''"' '> \
I /
~ 'Q~~ ./ .3 //
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
utl,,'ng Com:?lwJmr 7- II-()~
"*
6--/5-O~
......
SignaiUre
'k
I
I
I
i
I
I
~I
~
9
PARKING DECK ~
60 STALLS i:I
117'-4"
\ '---
CONC.
SAFETY
RAIL
Ion
\ ~I
, T!
ill
CONC. I
BEAM ---1
18'-0- rr..,. '''-0" '''-0" rr-O" 18"-0-
14
\
13
12 12
RAMP
BELOW
Q 1ST DECK PLAN
A2.
9
r"-L1GHT
I STAN ARO
PARKING DECK
64 STALLS ~
117'-4"
,....,.
I
I
J-oo
18'-0-
22'-0-
18'-0-'
18'-0-
CONC.
BEAM
-:r
~
\,
I
!
CHANG
ARCIDTECTURE
--'-,
I
I
Co
,
C'oI
It)
15
SCAlE: 1/16"=1'-0"
~ 2ND DECK PLAN
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Trtle
PARKING
FLOOR PLANS
Job.
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet:
A40165
3 29/06
AS NOlEO
A2.2
...----:...... __ .... ....._~ ..~.~:o......._. ....
.. .~ .. .. '" P'lf ,'.'!it" ~ ~//'
P 8ASlSOF8E..ftl'NG.~ ~~i!:.~.~~ '" iF" ;; ...~ -. "'-~lP.. '"
Z30.21 "",,", ~ ~ . PER FlIO"222.I 2a.14 .72
.. NB9"52'Ut: st .. DITIWICE (N)SS CONNECT1ON
~~" PJClIY STA__ ~ -----20U~ CITY STANllARIlS = ~..
"'~ ,"""uu,.. .. .. .... MARIANI DRIVE - - - ~ --=--~ - ~
~iie R~~~~. A ~ ~ '" ~;;ti~;;"~::- "'~::~~~'" ,~ .. ~ ~;'~-
....~ , -" "r- . . """-' -. -.- /".. "";, ..y
,./'_--------------_____~=~ 1 11~t;.. '-~ ~ ~'L- ~~ crc,:':_ ~ 34!J2 *- ~-,,~ CV~.~t~B" ~f-c ~" ~F .,." I
/ "; ~"1DOi I I' l ~ .L.J~T ,c-.22U7 I
/ //!,.~ -._f I 4"- : ,,~ I IiiiI I I 'T T : ::~I. i U,-r !iUI, OR i ~- "'-'3 \,). I
I (~ -- , r::'" I ~ I I I II I , I NEW ...;:-~~ T ) ~- 1
I "~-~ ~-- ._.~, ... I' +fi!'" I ",- ~ "- +:: ---- c ~ .n. I
I I ~'" FF "0 'if rw ,'!!O" "'.. UGH ,..,,,
I TO ~ -..':' ~: At. ~HlRECYClEil'JItII:nCII 't - -"'.- "~I I ..... I 231.5 fi!'" ~ e-" Il;f'sm!n .eo I",~lr'" Ilr''' TiF .r
~ in ~ ---~~3.J.11l 1- l./ilII .(D SO S'I!mII '"Illif'NlIE I I
I SO SO) ~ 110 r.l2IO.4 Ixfi!'70
Pm 'JJ.... -.~, ~ ~:..._~ ~~n"'= ... I J (IlPICAI,) ELE" L.-J; rL · - I '" :;,.,I~
PARa;;; A,~ ~~ __1~~~12211.5 Her ~ :~~; Ir'~~- i! -~'#--~~- --im) ~ ::: =-
469 MAPS 39 :~~I'&s _ _ _ ~ ':::'::" :" ,;'/~ ~= I ;:,.' 0 1i'll'Ic....:..", , \ PRJVAfE u, "',il' : 19'rJ ~1' I I I
A.P.N.: 326-33-' 9 . ~~I~ ~,~'" , : i7( n-j - I
.~ '"' ~ 10 ' 't ~ r'-i ' ~
'" '//!, . c....., - - - - ~_.w i;:L tIC V AI. h / ~ IID'OYE (E)WATER l.r' '".,,\ : ' I I 1 ,
~ r:: ~",i'" "'" ~" ..,.~ '- - .j I ~" aTY sms.ES~ r:. : .... )<@fR'.:'I:t1IIIlr'MI
j;r'j ii!l:t::b 2311 -- -.l <<..... x""" tIC _....0:. //I.if' 1i:ii." : I ~ ~ I
I'" 1ft vi'. !y!~F x.. .. J! ;: __ ~3 .. J~ rE==~ iM' ~...../J $1 ~~~~,:.. ;--r1-\ \~. I ~i ,I ~
..' "/' _ r ~ tIC '" , 'IA'-IJ I //I.if' ~:7rt;:1:; F"/~ : ,pall lr'" ~flr''' I
: " ,'!._ 'f12211.5 aDO V M ilN~ ll:' ~-1e"-: I UI' ':::II I I
2! , .. J' .... 181 T! ~J.r-"'--~/'Fi D · ",m tl'"' 2
I ..~ -~ 0 F ,JmL...1 DI __.~. ' I I ~
r I .. ~:... 1. Jllfl..3 ::.... 8.EC """ ~... I r.~ !~W =,..- I :<(N I I~
~~ II'''''; .. " J "",-... ..'- I ulCY a;;;;- ::; . :c: I }l
V ~ I, (~ """ ",. " I <!: Q...."-I'"' I
~.S1Il u '";k.~ \~..... :an b",J I.. -:;;'''''.,.: ~~ _N ....1 I ~
<:>mm~,,!!:JFl=- _ D;o --~~~~r.... v^",- n: __ J PARCELS 0 0 ,\:f..._", ';"IO'p.u.~. I I 1::11 I
~ 0 __LL"" ~__ ~~~~ ~ c r " FS ~.~ - A.P.~~ :::!3;!110 ~ -r J~~;:"469 J9i ~ IF I tlr"" Ill"""
._~ ra~~~ h- ABOVE +~=} ~~ ~"~ ~ \ ~ =+ I.....-J NEW IIUIUIING ~ ' ~ !}" "i ~ I I I
~~ I"'" ~ x" ~. / ~ trr0 \ ., FS~"l.b.,,, .... J ,.JIDIIj F1~= I ~ I I I I
-" 2311.5 2311.5 r [+Flll/l;!' "R I I I I
---l--I ..." +.. ....... c p;;. ....' T'I 231.5 "" ~
l~" I BH<E ~ -"1. ~ "Y""f'S "I...J!- . lll:1 \ " IInlleI,TE (n.-..~ I.... ""...... WATER RISER ~ ~ ' . I I I
RAMP UP ~-=o ~J'Ptf!i. \SrANWDS~ST~O~......~)...". "",'A ~
...., _ 0<. ~:- L~__~~ .~ J "..... P; II :.~,.. -" - ". - s 'I"" ~ i;F:ii '
x 11 ...oi ~~ '- xii<s7 X!P,;;- -'E," ~)C ''IF. r~ '''' ~ 22U7 ""'" ~
\l~ TEl'> "'~ ..... , ~'N. 52'24"< lilt' F'" :162.05' _~,!!;T"'.._ ;;;.~:;--1-I---JI~.-.;;.~I~--'::.~ ,
\~ ~\ ...,1:'\ TRASH ~~ ~ "~ ><=~ ."'" -=..~,.. ...... I ~rJI:" ~ z= ~~< <v=
p\ \ ~rr '\ \ \ \ 1:1 ~\ \ \ \ n \..., Na "l:-~ f...~ ~f.~~..x:f.-~ :r.- "IOR.~ 'f *"~..i" I I , I
CURVE TABLE ------- ~'~ I ~ ~rl 'b, ti.~ I I I
CURVE RADIUS DELTA ENG1H PARCEL A I I I /'fl I I I ,
C7 73,00' 6'48'25" 8.67' 584 MAPS 23Bc24 SIDEWALK EASEMENT AS i 15' ~
C2 73,00' 16"4,'57" 21,28' A.P.N.: 326-33-1' 4 SH~IIH ON 58f /I 2J.t241 I .<;. I I I I
CJ 57,00' 76'47'57" 16.6" , I , F-
C4 30,00' 90U?'n7" 47.74' I so' EASBlENT! ' II = I I I
:~~~~ ~FI I I ,
I PER BOOK F867, OR PC 600
I AS SHOWN ON 58f /I 2Jd!24 ~ I I I I
~7ION OF J.E.E. TO or ~~ ) I u:J' I
~ EASD.IENT A~ I 10' I @ fl!"" I l!""
roWN ON 584 /I 23f4r-U.E. I I I I
,.y>m
~..@
':":231.-
ir:.:225.1
.. SO)
T FOIIND J" BRASS DISK
I IN I/ONUIlENT IlflL
"CITY OF CUPER1INO'
~____ 'rS
@=,,,0.2> ,"'..
55 ss SS--ss
B
".
~..
x~.,.
~
Q:
l::l
)..
l...I
~
~
i
,4-SA'" ~acto -()/o IR -62c:J::b -Oc.
APPRO IAfrJ) "';),OOfo-O~
I ..............
I
I I
\ Planning Co't"uissl:", 7 - / /- 0 h
I n.l.
I Cify COlm II : 'Crt 5 - 010
I I ~).
, SignoJ" :K~
I ClIIC a,_& u
I
I
I ~
,
I
REF,
, NORTH
I 0 20 40
l I I
GRAPHIC SCALE
Hif~'
It
;
~ (~
~
'" ftf:Ir-..
~"".20
.....
~~~.t ~Ul/ENco;~
WITH DRILL HOlE
=,,,,... PER(469 /I 39) ~
,...FL I~ 1HRU:2tue d"
1__ -
I 90,04' -
IEif'"
JEIlM
uP"?
IMPROVEMENT
~ 1"-20'
PLANS
~
...
~
:5
'"
E
o
tJO-..~~
~~E!~~
~ Ot .............. ~
<(-<~~]>
~~~~~
~ ~.!...!..&
o ~ "'" "'".l!
:r::t:,."tr)~
Q :J ~0"1:
~!i:2:2~
-CD..............o
;i
(f)
~
Z
w
~
w
(f) >~
20-1
<c:( 0::: m
-J (L <( <(
Q ~NU
--..z
I-- <(-
2 WW~
Lu ~o- Vl
~ - I-- L.J
..c: (f) a::: i=
Lu 'W ei
> za.. ll..
o >- 1/);:) ~
0:::: O:::mU -'
Q<(--t :::!
~Zo ~
- -~ :z
~ i'l
.....J
W
0:::
(L
Ii:
L.J
~
o
.
.! ! .Q <>
.. ~ u F
0 0
S '"
.
a
0
..
c:
~
~
:
.;
~
SHErr
C-2
OF 5 SHEETS
JOB : 0&01B
SlllAW ROLLS "'UST BE PlACED
ALONG SLOPE CONTOURS
STRAW ROLLS
NOT TO SCALE
STORM DRAIN POllUTION PREVENTION NOTES:
I. PROlECT DOWN SlOPE DRAINAGE COURSES, STREAIIS AND STORM IlRAlNS WITH ROCK fIlLEI)
SAND BAGS, TE"'PORARY DRAINAGE SWALES. SILT FENCES- EARTH IIEIlIiIS, STORII DRAIN INLET ALlERS
ALTERS AND/OR SlllAW BALES USED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROPERLY INSTAUED SILT FENCES.
2. A STABlUZED CONSTRUCllON ENTRANCE SHAlL BE INSTAllED PRIOR TO THE INCEPTION or
AJf'( WORK ON-SITE. AND SHAU. REMAIN IN PlACE UNTIL THE COMPLETION or ALL
LANOSCAPlNG. EXIsnNG DRIVEWAY "'AY BE USED AS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
3. STRAW ROu.(S) SHALL BE 'NSTAUED PRIOR TO THE INCEPTION or AJf'( _ ON-SITE, AND
SHAU. REIIAJN IN PLACE UN1lL THE LANDSCAPING GROUND COVER IS INSTAUED.
4. DRY SWEEPING IlETHODS SHAlL BE USED TO REIIOVE AJf'( DEBRIS AND/ OR SOlL TRACKED ON TO
UNIVERSITY AVENUE. DRY SWEEPING SHALL BE DONE AT THE END or EACH WORK DAY.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOUOW AND USE BEST ...ANAGElIENT PRACTICES (BlIP) FOR DISCHARGE
INTO THE ClTY'S STORII WATER SYSTDI DURING SITE STRIPPING, HAUUNG, EARTH IlOVING
ACTMTIES, HEAVY EQUIP\IENT OPERAllONS. GEHEIlAl. CONSTRUCTION AND SITE
SUPERYlSlON. PAINTING. APPUCAllONS AND USE or SOLVENTS AND AIlHESIVES, LANDSCAPING
AND GARDENING.
6. STOCKPILED lIATERW. SHAlL BE COVERED WITH II1SQU[EN OR A TARPAUUN UNTIL THE
lIATERIAL IS REMOVED FROM THE SITE. AJf'( REI/AJNING BARE SOIL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE
STOCKPIlE HAS BEOl RDIOVED SHALL BE COVERED UNTIL A NATURAL GROUND COVER IS
ESTAIIUSHED OR IT lIAY BE SEEDED OR PlANTED TO PROVIDE GROUND COVER PRIOR TO THE
FALL RAINY SEASON.
7. ONCE THE PROPOSED ON-SITE ORAlNAGE INLETS HAVE BEEN INSTAllED, THE CONTRACTOR
SHAlL PROTECT AJf'( BARE SOlL fRO... ENTERING THE INLETS BY INSTALLING ALTER FABRIC
UNDER THE INLET GRATES. THE ALTER FABRIC SHALL REIotAIN UNTIL NATURAL GRQUND COVER
IS ESTAllUSltED.
8. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE DONE BY WATERING.
9. IF EROSION DEVELOPS IN A TElIPORARY EROSlOM PROTECTED AREA OR AJf'( ESTABUSHED
VEGETATED AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL 1......EDlATELY ALllVJATE AND REMEDY THE PROBLE'"
AND TAKE PREVENTATIVE "'EASURES TO ...INIIoIIZE THE POSSIBIUTY or ITS REOCCURRENCE AND
ALSO TO PREVENT THE RESULTIIlG flOW or SOlLS OR WATER WITH SUSPENDED SOlIS FROM
GETTING INTO THE crrs DRAINAGE SYSTDI OR ANY NATURAL DRAINAGE CHANNEl OR DITCH.
10. ALL DISTURBED SOIL SHAlL BE ....AlTED. AND SEEDED WITHIN 1WO (2) WEEKS or "ANAL
DISTURBANCE'".
FOR FURTHER INFORlIATION, CONTACT:
CITY OF CUPERTINO. CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
f18,# -~C()b -OV; ,/2 -~oob -C?j
APPROVAt U ~()l);-00
"........ ......
PIn",,;,'I COnlmas/'m Z -/1- 010
h::,
CIO' COlRI'Jcil 6- J5-0~
SignaiUft'.
CoP"
1. STRAW ROU. INSTAllATION R[QUlRES THE PLACEIotENT
AND SECURE STAKING or THE ROU. IN A TRENCH. 3.
TO 5" (75 TO 125 1lU) 1l[[P. DUG ON CONTOUR.
RUNOFF IlUST NOT BE AU.OWEO TO RUN UNDER OR
AROUND ROlL
VERTICAL SPACING FOR SlOPE INSTAllATIONS:
1:1 SLOPES = 10 FEET APMrr
2:1 SLOPES = 20 FEET APMrr
3:1 SLOPES = 30 FEET APMrr
4:1 SLOPES = 40 FEET APMrr
3. INSPECT AND REPAIR SlllAW ROllS AFTER EACH STORIot
EVENT AND RDotOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY.
4. REUOVED SEDIIotENT SHAll BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA
THAT WIlL NOT CONTRJ8UT[ SEDlII[Nf OFf-SITE AND
CAN BE PEIlIIANEIlTLY STAlllLlZ.ED.
@ ,...,... McCUU.AH
ClIICIlIlI
25' _ TO EP
..~
---1 IEXISIING ROAD
2. rJIUSHED ROCK \ j I _ _
~""'"~'''
----- .. .............. .......... ............ .......... .... ......
---
, 4.11II.
EXlSIlIIG GROUIIl
fJlJ[R FAIlIIIC
BlIIt;
I. PROVIDE A FANNED STABlUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO ACCOIIIlOIlATE THE TURNING
RADIIIS or CONSTIlUCTJON EOUIPIIENT ON AND OFF THE PUBUC STREET.
2. INSTALL STAIlIUZED CONTRUCTION ENTRANCE ALONG NEW DWY CORRIDOR FOR THE FUU.
PROPOSED WIDTH.
3. Il[-US[ EXIST1NG ORIYEWAY ENTlWICE AS CONSTRUCl1ON ENTRANCE WHEN POSSIBlE.
NOT TO SCALE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PONllING lIT.
STANDARD DETAIL
TRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFIU.
PONOING Hr.
..RUNOfF
ALTERNATE DETAIL
TRENCH WITH GRAVEL
!------\~
/-,\ ----- ",-
I' _/ '.,
; ~\"
/)'\-.- . ,
"' ;' ,--- I \ '
,- / ~' I, EXISTING fRE[
'i, TO RDlAIN.
l,' " /_
~ ~ I )
I" l _~ / I
1'---.,-.- //'./:
).....-, --..~ ---' \
! / /\
l ....---~.
...
o
...
l:!
~ ~
W'O"""'-..~
~~~~~
~OI'-"'-.s
"'~lI)o)Q
QO~~~
Q::; ....... Q.
~~.!..!.&
~(1~~~
Q ~ O'O'~
~~~:28.
- ED '-'....... 0
PROTECTIVE FENCING
QII
1lQIa:
I. PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALl. BE BRIGHT
ORANGE POLYPROPYlENE FENCING.
2. NOTHING INSIDE THE ORIPUNE AREA
SHALL BE RAKED, CUT, STORED, OR
OTHERWISE DISTURBED.
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
NOT TO SCAlE
(/)
(/}I-
:::!Z
-<(w
....,:~
L...JW
Q>o
~O~
0::: CD
~ 1:1..<<
t- ~NU
O-z
Z <0
W I.&J Z
-.I I- 0 - (I)
0- I-~
a:: (/) . e:i :5
t- zo..o-
Z >-It):J ~
o 0::: Ol U -J
o -c::(..q- ~
ZZ~ ~
Q~ V!i
(/)-
0-1
a::W
L...JO:::
1:1..
TREE PROTEClION NOTES'
1. PROTECT ElOSTIIIG VEGETA1ION. INCLUOING OYERIWIGING IlRANCHES AND ROOTS FROII
COIIPACllON AND DAIIAG[ DURING MATERIALS STAGING AND COIISTIlUCTlON. TREHCIlING
ADJAC[Nf TO AND WITHIN TREE ORIPIJNES TO BE DONE BY IfAND TO AVOID ROOT DAlIAGE.
IF ROOTS LARGER THAN ONE (I) INCH DIAIIllETER ARE ENCOUNTERED. ALERT lANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. DAllAGE TO ANY EXISTING PlANTS OR PlANTS TO REIIAJN AR[ TO BE IlEPlACEO
AT THE EllPDJSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. PROlECT TREES WITH FOUR (4) FOOT PlASTIC
IlESH FENCING AS SHOWN ON PlAN.
2. DO NOT PARK VEIlIClES OR STORE IIATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE ORIPUNES OF
EXISTING TREES TO REl/AJN.
3. WHERE IT IS NECESSARY TO EXCAVATE ADJACENT TO EXISTING TREES. THE CONTRACTOR
SHAU. US[ CARE TO AVOID INJURY TO TREES AND TREE ROOTS.
4. NO TREE ROOTS GREATER THAN ONE (1) INCH IN DlAIIETER MAY BE CUT DURING THE
PERFORIIANCE OF DEIoIOUTIOll WORK. INSTAllAlION OF UTIlITIES OR CONSTRUCTION Of
FOOTINGS.
S. WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION, THEY SHALL BE CAREFULLY
UNCOVERED AND THE AO.IACENT lIATERIAL IlEUOVED WITHOUT ROOT DAIIAGE, AFTER WHICH
THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE IIIIIEIlIATElY BACKfIU[D.
6. EXCAVATION SHAU. BE DONE BY HAND IN AREAS WHERE TWO (2) INCH ANO lARGER ROOTS
OCCUR. AN\l IN AREAS WITHIN THE DRIPUNE OF EXISlTNG TREES TO RDIAIIC.
7. ROOTS TWO (2) INCHES AND lARGER IN DlAIoltTER. EXCEPT DIRECTLY IN THE PATH OF PIPE
OR CONDUIT, SHALL BE TUNNELED UNDER AND SHAU. BE HEAVILY WRAPPED WITH BURlAP
TO PREVENT SCARRING AND EXCESSIVE DRYING.
8. WHERE A DITCHING MACHINE IS RUN ClOSE TO TREES HAVING ROOTS SIIAlUJI THAN TWO
(2) INCHES IN DIAIotETER, THE ROOTS SHALL BE IfAHD TRIIIIlED AT THE WAlL or THE
TRENCH.
9. WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBlE TO AVOID CumNG ROOTS GREATER THAN ONE (I) INCH IN
01AllETER. THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHAU. BE NOTIf1ED. AND THE WORK SHALl BE
DONE ONLY BY A OUAIJAED ARIlORIST. ROOTS OF TREES SHALL BE CUT USING ClLAIl.
SHARP PRUNING TOOLS. ROOTS SHAll NOT BE IIROKEN OR TORN LEAVING RAGGED ENOS.
10. CLOSE TRENCHES ADJACENT TO TREES WITHIN 24 HOURS. IF THIS IS NOT POSSIlLE, KEEP
SIDE OF TRENCH AO.IACENT TO THE fRE[ SHADED WITH BURlAP OR CANVAS.
11. CONTINUAl. P1JDDUNG OR RUNNING OF WATER IN THE VICINITY OF THE TREE SHAll BE
AVOIDED.
Ii:
.....
~
o
. I
o ~
Q N
;;;-
. .
1; ~
c:: '"
:!
,g
I!lm:i:
1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AfT[Jl EACH STORM EVEN
AND REIIOVE SEIlDlENT WHEN IIECESSARY.
2. RENOVED SEDDIEIIT SHALL BE IlEPOSITED TO AN ARn
THAT W1U. NOT CONTRHIUTE SEllIIlENT OfT-SITE AND
CAN BE PERIIANENTLY STAlllJZED.
3. SILT FENCE SHAll BE PLACal ON SI.OP[ CONToURs
TO _IZE PONDING EFFICIEIlCY.
..
c:
~
~
:
NOT TO SCALE
SILT FENCE DETAIL
:i
SHErr
C-4
OF' 5 SHEETS
JOB,: 0&01B
SHRUBS
--===-
- - - --=- -=- ~ =-= -::._-~ -==- --== =- -==-==- =..-==-= =- .~ ~
.?
-----
~-.>
MARIANI AVENUE
1URf' AS POl
NO. DE AHZA 9L\ID.
CXWCfPlUAl. PlAN
OFFICE
<>
I
I
I
I I
3' I
~SC1 ~ I
WAU. I
I
I
1 1111
1 ~'
I ~I
i
i wi
L_ I 01
- :z:1
"I
D ~!
1t$FI- cJlDCh -010 TR-~
APPROVAl.. U -dkob -()t,
............
Plnnnl", Comudsslo" 7 --J /-D
....
elfJ' emmel' to --/5 -f!)~
Sisnaaure
S"MlOl
Plantin end
SIZE BOTANICAL NAllE COMMON NAIIE
24" Box Arbutus '''orIna'- multi Hybrid 11_
24" Bo. Cerda CCl'M)den.. "Forest PGMY' Emom Redbud
15 Gal. Cord)ll1ne austnlllo 'Rod star' Ho Common Name
24" Box P)f\lS Co "Olanticleer' o.antic:leer Ornamental Pear
24' eo. Sequofa .. 'Simpson'. SlY..' Cooet Rodwoocl
CONMENTS SY\lBOl. SIZE BOTANICAL NAllE COUIION NAIlE CONMENTS General Notes
PERENNIALS
Ul 1 Gal. Lantana m. "Purple' Trallng Lant""" 1. "Green or Sustainable Landscape':
L.S 1 Gal. l.avenduIa .toechaa Spanlah La__ a. Landscape waUs to be constructed of recycled aggregate with 'Trex'
LP 1 Gal, Umonlum perezli Soa L___ veneer to match the bui'ding.
MS 1 Gal. Miacanthu. slnenale 'ZebrInu. lIoIden Graa b. Majority of the De Anza entry pavin~ wnl be impervious to allow rain water
G10nt Uriop. to percolate back into the groundwa er table.
OJ 5 Gal Ophlopogon jaburan
1 Gal. Pennisetum F"ountaln Grass c. Landscape heoderboard between paving and p'anting to be 'Tre. rec)lCled
PE plastic and wood fiber or approved equal.
PH 5 Gal. Phormlum .~. HJbrId Flax
5 Gal. Phonnlum 'Bronze Baby" HJbrId Fla. d. Reuse of th e numerous existing landscape boulders on site.
PH
PH 3 5 Gal. Phonnlum 'Dusky Chief H)I>rld Fl.. e. All p'ants and planting areas are to be amended and mulched with rocyc'ed
wood from SF! Organics (yard trimmings and wood waste) or approved equal.
PH 4 5 Gal. Phormlum 'Plott". Block" HJbrId Flax
f. 90:!: of the selected plants are classified as "ow water usage' by the State of
51. , Gal. SalYIa leuoontha - Sago California, Department of Water Resources (WUCOLS).
g. All trees and shrubs wm be watered by a low volume or drip irrigotion system.
GROUNDCOISlS
~ ' Gal. Comla p. 'Duoky Bello' Australian Fuchsia 4' '.c. IpOClng
, Gal. Grevlltea "Low Form' -y ~eo ;r ..c. II'OCinll 2. Provide a minimum 3" layer of recycled wood mu'ch within existing tree drip'ines.
, GaL HoIlctatrlchan 61"" Oot Gr_ , B" .,c. IpOClng The area 5' from each tree trunk is not to be planted, watered, nar is any
1 Gal Roemar1nu8 0. 'Huntington Carpet' R-.."'Y 2' o.c. apocIno trenching allowed.
, Gal. SeoveoIa '..ou.,. CIust.... F... Flower 2' o.c. apoelng
Sad 'Moda1IIon' by P.clflc Sad TaIt feacue Conceptual Landscape Plan
Scale: 1 II = 20' - 0"
1llEES:
All
cc
CA
PC
ss
AS
5 Gal. Abutllon 'Moonbeam' F1.werlng lIop1e
5GoL Clivta mlnklta 'Solomon. Hpid" Yellow KGffir Uy
5 Gal. Dlcksonia antcrtico Tasmanian Tree Fem
5 Gal. I.oropotolum chln_ 'Plum' fringe Flower
5 Gal. lI)I1co call1omlco Pacific wax ")rUe
5 Gal. Nandln. d. 'Gulf Streom' Gulf Streom H_y Bamboo
5 Gal Pitt"",,,",,,, tab/rQ -'ogat. Variegotod TabIra
5 GaL RaphJo&epta umbeGata 'Ulnor' Dworl Yeddo Hawthorn
5 Gal, R~ar1nua 0. "Tuecan Blue' Tuscan Blue- Roserncry
5 Gal. Sarcococcc ru.tlfolia Fragrant Sarccx:occa
5 Gal. Westringla lru"-m Coaot R.......ry
CII
DA
LC
lIC
NO
PT
RII
RT
SR
Ml
5
-
~
1Mm
Greg G. Ing
& Associates
LsndJcape'-'-
1585 Thtt A/smed4. Suite 201
SonfDse, QJOOmio 9512ti
a.Nr~ 1lar4lll2ll._
Rev.
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Title
Conceptual
Landscape Plan
Job'
Dele:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
M0165
32906
AS NOTED
CL1
A ~F"f'"'O~ ''AL
~"r> r-' e-{. v
ORe
C;,-"~qtu, I"a
V<;:1' .t..~...-
r
,...
,...
>It
...
,.
'"
...
..
r
...
to'
...
'I
".. ~ 1SI ~
II"
..
..-
woo.
. .
1: 1:
HlIDWSl 3flO LFPER BLOWER MUPPER
24 STAUS 13 28 STAlLS 24 STAlLS 26 STALlS .
11 11 11
~ ~
13 15 13 15
~ ~ FLOOR PlAN
1S,49SCAEE: 1/16'=1'-0"
_J==
IE--J-
IE--J-
~
..
!:
!:
It
r
11
~ ~ FLOOR PLAN 16,493 DIE: 1/16'=1'-0' J:.=
....
.,
r--------------------------'
I I
t I
I I
I I
I I
I
r----J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---0----
r
I
I 'r
~
i'L_
I
I
I
-
-
]
to'
-
...
.
,srLCMER
20 STALLS
tSTUPPER
20 STAlLS
11
22 STALLS
.
9
9
I
:j
F==
I
I
I
I
11
11
ON<_
~
~
L__________
Q;) ~E~;~~.FLOORP~~ 1/16'-1'-0"
J:::
E--J-
~~~~;~~
SCAl!: 1/16"-1'-0"
J==
@--J-
Rev. Descrip. Dale
ii?EW~
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino. CA
DraWing lltIe:
GARAGE
FLOOR PLANS
Job#
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
3/29 06
AS NO
A2.2
Cclp~ 2lIOll by QIcng ihdln, Inc.
APPROVAL
A- 54 - ~oo(p - it..
. Application Number
q-:lI-d~
~ -~ ~~~---
DRe
Signature
LE.Va 3-L
EL 20'-0
STAINLESS STEEL
CABLES FOR V1m:5
CONe. COLUMN
(PI)
ACCENT COLOR
(P2)
<D
I
RAMP
BEHIND
G:I
I
;.,
b
~
--
-----
b
OPEN
b
-
---
- L ---=- ----=-.=--.I _
lPJEL B
EL -5'-0.
---
P
in
--------~
~ SOUTH ELEVATION
S!;AU': 1!8"-1'-{]"
ACCENT
COLOR (P2)
STEEL
STAIR (P2)
'"
J LEVEL 3=U +
'r')
EL 25'-0"
b
. LEVEL 2-U +
rD
I EL. 15'-0.
00
'"
g
LMl 1-U +
EL 5'-0.
in
in
lJ-~,""'" t- - - ~ ~ - - ~ EASTELEVA110N - - ~ - ~ - - - - L L - ~ - - - - - -1 .,
KJ.. SCAlE: '/S"a"-o"
ACCENT COLOR
(1)2)
-+ WIfl. 3 U
EL 25'-0"
.I. LEVEL 2-U ~
T EL 15'-0. .'
l!l
+ Lf.VEL I-U
EL 5'-0.
+ Lt.Va B
EL -5'-0"
SET BACK
LEVEL B +
EL. -5'-0"
CONe. GUARPRAlL
'"
I
;.,
<D
I
;.,
b
--
OPEN
b
---
.
'"
I
;., LEVEL 2-L
EL 10'-0
SH
--
in
---
L____-_____L___~
~ NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8".,'-0"
DECK BEYOND
COLOR (PZ)
GUARDRAIL (p I)
LEVEL 1-L
EL 0-0
L____________________________________J
~ WEST ELEVATION
SCAIL: 1/8".1'-0"
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
ny Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
DrawIng TIlle:
GARAGE
ELEVA TIONS
A2.3
~
by 0IlnII ~ hie.
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
~
Ildlgoioo F... _I
CaIbtio 14010 .. ....~CIlIIl'
ANY MOUNTAIN OFFICE BUILDING
Planning Submittal
April 26th, 2006
May 26th, 2006 (Revised per City comments)
10495 North De Anza Blvd., Cupertino, CA
APN: 326-33-110
Sf} - ~a0 -{)/P
APPROVAl. U - (}.~-~ , .,e- 'fPt:;-o9
"......... ......,
Planning CODfI:l!ssimr 7 - / / - O?t.JC/o
11.1.
Cif)' COtmcil B- /5- .;<a:::t,
SignaiUre \.. -: I ~/
Cue ll. U
INDex
C COVER
A1 SITE PLAN
A2 OFFICE FLOOR PLANS
A2.1 OFFICE FLOOR PLANS
A2.2 PARKING FLOOR PLANS
A3 ELEVATIONS
A4 ELEVATIONS
C1 TITLE SHEET
C2 PRELIMINARY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C4 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C5 CITY OF CUPERTINO BMP
L 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN
GENERAL STATS
SITE AREA: 72,241 SF BLDG. AREA:
60.000 SF (20,000/FLR)
(1,658 ACRES) FLOORS: 3
DE ANZA REO'D SETBACK: 50' FAR: ,83
PARKING
CDNSTRUCTION TYPE: V-l HOUR REO'D: 210 STALLS (3,5/1000 SF)
BASIC: 14,000 SF (1 PER 285 SF)
MULTI-STORY: 28,000 SF PROPOSED:
SPRINKLERED: 56,000 SF AT GRADE 92 STALLS
2 SIDE-YARDS: 84,000 SF STRUCT:l' 60 STALLS
(ALLOWABLE) STRUCT. 2 64 STALLS
OCCUPANCY: B (OmCE) PROPOSED: 216 STALLS (3.6/1000 SF)
l'
124'-1"
HC
18
1
7
\
,
,
A-S/4 - ~~, 'r-I<. -~~ -OC}
APPROVAtjJ - ~coh-Ofo
~.......
SCALE: 1 "=20'
"Itrnnlng Conrmlssl:m 7- J 1- ,;(C1!i.o
Om
riOt emmell e,... 15 - ~([){;k
AoIe
SignllUle Co-e:- h
Cae"e-a- ()
~[~
.
.......... DECl( f2
n
~ I
..... QECI( "
L.""""""'"
HEADS
OFFICE
IIoor Il(lQ>lt: 267.2
OFFICE
ItOOP" HbGHY, .7.2
~~
;t~1
~r If14 I
~:fft{. ~:0:-:':-:-"~~
.I-. lib: ~~. ____~<:~~t:,~... _~~
~' ~ -::~:::~:::~::-\ \Y..J
.:"" "0. ">:-:-:-:-:', l~
,'~":~i;. l\ \}}.-: -:-:
(:~~..); -: ..~ ::' /.<
___ '.-lANDSCAPE', v..... 'j..I '.' .',
h..'''V DRAWING' V\ ' I -:-: :-:.
\( ,'" . . . . . .
~,' ,.>:-.'~ <\f: <>
- ...x. "~'::('~E"~.C.:2'> >r\: ~<
. .,"\. 0: g~4" .'~'.' 1\"
. 'r:'-"';~~E 1;>- ;- '.'f'.', .'
':"-. ;...........:... '.< ::,:::: .
'.' l' .--L.' "(,.,,.,
. ....=-...", T"
<:/ "'"""i1 '::r>:
'F-<r
.
o
,
,(..... f-:-:--,== ~-
I~-I
, I
I I I
_+__yf--
I I!----:-,-
! ,..~
j ..~
I ~II:= I
-'!.- -
----~f--
I
I\--
I ,
LL
~.
',-:-:-:
..1....,.
t )J:;~
:-:~[::] I
,., II'
-:-:-:-:1 -:
"" I', I
" -:::::::::1[-::::'
~~"- ~~. -::::}:::::'
-- .,' '~,.,I.:.:-
'11 ~::f:::::
')~'I:::::I
J '-\ I::::: /
- _J ,.... 'f ~t =""-. --,. t1 J ~ '\ :} I
_ I -----1-------+ (:, ~_ \K::
. J.L-- I 135 , o. - - - -, 1dr 7" 7' ~
1<rASH n-AIH 1r-A3f. I 8"RVlD 5.A9l I)
t51) 16'11 rS'D~A5M 1...A5tl '4"A>>l. -. 10'010'11
'5'0 ISO l5'D ~fD A3H :~ASH ,I . ... T . ...1
I~ J-.. ,... ;a,J
Ir r------ !on ~L.. I
I 1 :
r r ,
....
';,
.,
1
~..:=::::;::;::'"1~ ~"
u______ --..J I '''"'~
.'!- ........
... ,...,. I ~ I _ '::. >
11~ ~ "'~~
2ND FlDOIl ~- _"_. "" w
i ~ '- ~
~ II "",~I
1ST FLOOR I 1- II'...... .......
T'1 ~ DE NaA Bl'
I (+0>')
I
(_, LOIlOO'
(];) SITE SECTION
A1
SCALE; 1" 20'
---~
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
-
~
i
I
,
or
~I
~I
~i
~:
~:
I:'
~I
5:
,z r
I
I I
I
I
I
I
i
,.
REDUCEDSETBA~ REMOVE (E) ----+-- - - _~ARlA.~)_!\YENU~ - - ...L
FROM15'TO 0'-\ ENTRY +~EP CE~ REMOVE (El. REMOVE (E) - - - --- -- - -- =--=-= =--=-= =- - --,
r----- WALKWAY SIDEWAL~ ENTRY + REPLACE ,{,
~ / _..'\ /\ WALKWAY _ \ - . n c::;f"" _
i \ / '.. "- ~ l::"'lo ''-!'''' ~
.--- '- '\I -\( "j7 ~~ ,.... ______\\ ~ 2....,./ " \ v
,/~____________________.~__~~ E.~.. I ~I --r- ~ ':;;ro ~m- :;;"':::...:f ~~ - :::::0 1""1 1O"4--=n-
// ( '~.l!-!lI!~~i .. ____ ~__~~ :11Qi1 -- ~:)-1S
1./: I I t-~
i l' ~q 10 ~. .. I
I ...~\ tT-<r I .-r I. 17'-<r ,L/}I I I ~
: ~V- -- : 92 STALLS ~ TRASH(..J : 'II' I-----
I :...... I :d.... ~-<r w-r :d-<r RECYCLE ..-0"1 11
I I ,...... Ir-<r I........ ~
: OFFICE ( I- ~'T. _-"I h _. i::L 1.. 1 I
: In _ _\"+ : He
I ,,.. I I ''r 'I I
I . =tr=' I~. lill I
I 11 I I! ; HC I
: _ ~ ;;; -< .. : i ~ (,
i EASEM~ :rl :::-=' ~ 1rr ~I He,'
\ ACCESS '-- "- ~ I
! '-~. to-{ 1
I 'A~ :
\ Ii
i I I' J
: <> ~ ' ill ~~GgF 9 u r, 12
: .- -r - I I DECK ~'
I ~ - : y---- ABOVE RAMP W
: I Y iABOVE i
i ~~ ~.~-:~. L: -<r 1\1"'" t~, f / ~~;-!
I : 'r I X, 6 ,/ UP
I " ~I 3
: I ' ~ / TURN-
I ~r'"~f-I _J I~' ~P " /71 AROUND
t -. "'-'. ~rrv -'-"- ~
. . ..._. . . r~. I
~ A
(T\ SITE PLAN
\M7
'..:",:'
'::,,:,T~/::
i.:
..J!i
I
I
!
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
r
I
i
r
j
I
I
I
I
!
r
r
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
.._ PIloIv*lQ I
IIlI QopIll _ Tot 5
~IMOIO = =----
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rev, Descrin.
ARCH. IlLDC. RE\IIEW
DESIGN SUllII1TTAL
DESIGN RE\1SIONS
PC[ BASE
Date Bv
3m~
4/a/06
5/2&/08
6/30/08
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Title
SITE PLAN
Job #
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
3/29/~
AS NOTED
A1
Gr+
, !
I . I
Iv
I I,
I ~I
0-t-, ,
!<j'
10
t')
~
I
i
I
I
i
---If- -
I
i
'0 -'f<----T-
'-...:/1 i
I '1'
I;
I ~I
cv-+-~-
I . I
I 01
i .1
o
I t') I
cv+-+---
I I
r 01
. i I I
;/ g
t!,
0+--
I oi
I~
~I
, I
cv+ I
I ·
15'
I ~
II
l'r
:..rl 0
.11 t')
VI
I'
I
I
I ~i I
I '01 I
I t') I
0-fJ
I ~I
N
0-,
II II
-t~-
--
TI
II
I II
, I
jll_
BROW
ABOVE
I
BROW
BELOW
I
Rev.
I .
10
, I
jg
J 'I' I I
! I
,40=0- --- - l 21'-0=1__ 40~:=o-~t_2o' ~o-__+
E ~ 0 G G
-oq
G;) 18T FLOOR PLAN
G--
I
I
----~---
I
I+SI1-- - ~COo -olp rR - ~
PPROVAI. JA <J~--otn
".............
- -
~., ~o====cr=o- i=~~C~--f"-O'=l
Any Mountain
Office Building
SCALE: 1 /16"= l' -0.
(];) 2ND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0.
Cupertino, CA
lInnlng Con,mlssl:m 7-/1- c:1ociJ
ObI.
0' COlmcl'_(O- J5- dfJdo
...
Drawing Title
OFFICE
FLOOR PLANS
ignaaure
Job #
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
3/29/06
AS NOTED
A2
G-t I
i i
I' I
I~I
I 10,
~-t
I. 'OJ
I.'
'0
o-U-
I, I
. ! l' '
. i. I
1: g I
~
r--
I. I
I!/
101
I
0-
i
i~
I 'I
1'0
I 10'
I
0-1,
I~I
~
flSIl - ~oO" -Oip rl2 - ~CJJIo
APPROVAl. U - ~~ -ote
"........ ........
1l1nnl11' Cmlllll&sI:m 7 -11- Dlt,
Il~l.
'0- (5-00
CHANG
ARcmTECTURE
@
I
T
G---r
!
, !
~,
,
~
10
0)---~
I
I
. I
!I
101
I
0----t--
I
~I
.11
o
10
LoJ
o
o
oc
I
-.--
I
- ------
I I
~~
, i
I- -I-
i ,
I MECH.J
fCREEN
I
- !- -
BROW
BELOW
0---1
i
, 1
01
.'1
gl
0-'-+-
i lOCI
.1 >>
Q-~I! ____ L .et _~~ ~
~'1" I I SO'LER! I
a I
N I
r- -~f-F~c9i2"-o~l
I I
I
LoJ
I
cr-o---r-i
I
I
- -- - -lji-- -
Rev.
G-
I I
40--0" ~25'=0"-- 1
1 '
CV G
Any Mountain
Office Building
~ 3RD FLOOR PLAN
A2.1
~ ROOF PLAN
A2.1
Cupertino, CA
SCALE: 1/16"= l' -0"
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
Drawing Title
OFFICE
FLOOR PLANS
Job.
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
32906
AS NOTED
A2.1
,
n ~
~= = n~ .- ~ 'T~~ iT AC~~ L
I
I 22"-0-
: _'nnn~ ~
n' .,. -- -- .. I
I
f---- I
Iy
l~
i .I
:..::J---'j<
nO '--"7 :Zt
I
I
I
I
I
,~
f___--"8'ir u9
o - -- - , II> I EDGE OF
I~ GARAGE
~DECK
n I ABOVE RAMP
I / ABOVE
..- ~f~ \:'~, >\V"/ 3
J 11 "RAMP UP,- //
=1 '-QO%) -' [ /
i ~~ ___
0:
nn __,n I
I
18'-0-
'8'-0- _
'I
I- '
9
.""1,,, Commlssl,Pn _ 7-)/ -o/r;
p..,
'0' COlmcll 6- i 5 --fJ{n
.....
Signaaure
u
TRASH
/REC
~ glll
10 . n
~~J '-J I
25' , I
b I
I I
il
22"-0' 18"-0- . 18'-0- --,j< I
h ~i
11
'A
HC :
==i [j
I HC I
1
~l I
~I I
J HC I :
9
I I
1 I
j I
'it I
I
I
r 10 q
12 I
~I 1
I
~j I
I
1
llIn I
I
I
14
yl
1!
-I'
I
I
i
I
I
9
PARKING DECK y
60 STALLS il
117' -4"
\
''--- CONe,
SAFETY
RAIL
0
~I
\ 11
ill
CONC. I
BEAM -J
'8'-0- 22"-0- '8'-0" ur-o- 22'-0' '8'-0-
/
\
13
RAMP
BELOW
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
~ 1ST DECK PLAN
P:2,
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
~ 2ND DECK PLAN
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
9
r--UGHT
STAN ARO
PARKING DECK\!
64 STALLS ~
117'-4"
,8'-0-
,
,
,
I
J-o'
111'-0-
22'-0"
,8'-0-
18'-0-
CONC.
BEAM
'0
il
~
I
~
15
---1
I
I
Co
I
N
It)
Rev.
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Title
PARKING
FLOOR PLANS
Job.
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet:
A40165
32906
AS NOTED
A2.2
IIlL PAIEL
t.lECH ~ HORZ. RIBBED
\ ~ STUCCO'
\ AN-WAll.
(C) IIlL PANEl ~
it.IECH:\D
i
r~fL (P3) ~
.1 r~
.'1'1 I GlASS (P4~
"I I
. ---'>-- ROOF ~
-: I EL 43'-0. .
!I
-j
3~~;' +
STAINED
J GUARD~\
HORZ.
RIBBED
r~\
IIlL JI R
( )
~
b
..,
I
I
i
10 .
10
ior))
- ~
2~~" +
TRASH
ENClOSURE
BE'/llND
1
EL. 0-0
G) NORTH B~~I.~~ ELEVATION (MARIANI)
STAINED
COUIMNS~\
(J;) NORTH ~~~o~LEVATION (MARIANI)
~ j ':~. +
~ I
WTL. BROWS \
\
IIlL PANfL \
lIECH SCREEN""\
BE'roND (P3) '\
ftSA -dodp-00 172-:?ooh
PROVAI...lJ --dOOIn -DIn
................
TRANSl.UCDlT
GlASS
~ SPANDREL(P4)
. .
100
I I
~in
- ...
nll1' ConmaZssl:m 7 -/ J - 0 ~
lMk
'0 -/5 -oil)
0...
W EAST EN~~ ~:~ATION (DE ANZA)
ca.OR KEY
(PI)
(P2)
(P3)
(P4)
SEPIA
RUST COlOR
SILVEll
1RANSI.lJCENT OPAl
EL. 4~. +
~~+
~~+
REVEAl
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
SlAB EDGE-fij
,~D_~
jEL. 20'~
::. I
I
~ T
t. lST~
.I~;o'~
~I I
EL. 0-0
Rev. Desai .
ARCH. IlLOO. IlE'IIEW
DESIGN ~AL
DESIGN _
PGE BASE
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Title
ELEV ATIONS
Job.
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
32906
AS HOlED
A3
1,
I
5!
STAINED CONCRErE
r CUARDRAlL BEHIND SLAB
. EDGE (PI)
CONC,
SlAB EDGE (PI)
+ ~'-O.
CHANG
ARCIDTECTURE
G;) WEST ~~~=~~EVATION
STAINED
CONCRETE \
ACCENT (P2) \
\
t9&I4 -d)~ -ob 77Z -,;;()Ob ~
APPROVAl.. U-;~f'I)J., -Ot,
............. ......
CONe. RAMP
CONCC~~~ (P2)"'\
,
----
STAINED
CONCRETE "\
CUARDRAIL (PI) \
STAINED
COLU~~~~~\,
\
;;4;<;:'
BmAIGHl" IlAMP 1ST I'LOO\l
ST K
ELO-o
HORZ.
RIBBED
STUCCO
I (P2)
-~~?t
---1-l ~D_D~
I I IEL 20'-~
91 :r/
i;ljl 2 r
I ~t . ~~o~~~~ +
EL o~~ +
1'1""nl11C C'nnrmlsslm: '7 -II-oto
-.-.-
'-"'"{oj: Cmmcil
6 - i S--Dft,
o..c.
SignaiUre
1
S!
+ :.~. O.
i.j
I!/
+ ::'a~ ['I
.'f ' 2ND_D~ % 61
EL 2O'=O"T "'! l
+ ~l[to: I:
~_ID~~.+ ':rl
..
C?
I
i
o
I
I
WTL PANEL ~
IIECH SCREEN ·
BEYOND
!
G;) EAST G~~;~EVATION
CONe.
,I SlAB EDGE (PI)
CONC. SAFElY
WALL. TYP.
ELEV.
(BEYOND
@ SOUTH G~~_~o~LEVATION
~ SOUTH ~V~~~~N
?
MTL PANEL
IIECH SCREEN\
BEYOND (P3)
COR-TEN IIErAl
LATTICE SIDING
o BEHIND GlASS OR
r AlTERNAlE(P2)
I
cp
I
I
EL 4~" +
Any Mountain
Office Building
~~~. +
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Tdle
.
... .
I 0
. I
:? ~I
~F1.!!Q!L.I...
I EL 16'=O"T
JII
~i I
I I
ELEVATIONS
Job #
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
3 29/06
AS NOTED
G) WEST EN~1~~;VATION
A4
VICINITY MAP
a:M.(: u.s.
ANY MOUNTAIN OFF~C S
PRELIMINARY SITE IMPROVEMENTS
10495 N. DE ANZA BOULEVARD
:i' .
CUPERT/NO~ CA
ftSfl- ~h --Gf.b T72 -;7~.,
APPROVAl. U - ,J.aio -~
.........~
Plannl"g Comndsslmr F7 -t I ~
q
SURVEYOR LEGEND:
.
A
~
III
III
Be
BFP
...
C
co
""""
COlI Pm
..
E-T
EB
EP
EV
FDC
FI'
A.
ClIl
rNA
ow
ICY
,
III
If'GAS
III
...
NO
PI.
..
RSR
-
so
.....
55
.....
sw
T
111
1llE
1llP
..
U1L Pm
..
..
wv
YS
_ _ _ _ 9Clt.INDARY lIE
_ _ _ CEN1ER lINE
- - - - - - - - tASEIlENT LItE
- - - - S1RfET lNE LItE
CIO' Com~cll
RUrID It.ICINIAIENT PER 1 M 1693
~ COII1ROL PaNT
IIENOI _
........T
N€A IlRAII
IIULI>>C COIlIIER
8AQ( Fl.OI' I'llE\UI1llIl
IlOIURD PttE
COIlCIlElE
ClEAII CUT
COIIIlUIICA_
COIMJNICA1IDH PEDtSTN...
IlRAII IUT
EUI:1IIIC~ IN;S
E1EI:1RIC BOX
EDGE CF PA\9IENT
ElS:1IIC vMl.r
fIlE VALlES
FNSH FLOOR ELEVAlION
FUIII LIE
CIlAIlE IllEAK
GAS YM.\E: ASSEIB..Y
lIlY ~
1IRQA1ICIN CON1RCI.. VALVE.
.-r PCU
_ HlLE
_ PllESSUIlE GAS
lIAL BOX
..... HlLE
NA1UIW. GROUND
PIlllPERlV LItE
-
II5Bl
IlEDMXlD 1REE
S1IAI IlRAII
SItIRII IlRAII ..... HlLE
SANTARY SEE!
SNlTM'Y SDER WAN IO.E
SIDE"""
1REE (SPECIES NOT 1lEN1IFIDl)
lUEPHlIIE BOX
"" <:F SLlI'E
1llP <:F SLlI'E
U1lUTV BOX
U1lUTV PEDESTAL
WAlER BOX
WAtER rAUCETT
WAlER VAL'tlE
'/SLOW __/Ill
Signaaure
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'..-
.....
-
'1.- "",-
All
AC
AD
Be
8CR
HOC
BW
C8
CL
cs
DO
OS
rYrf'f
(E)
EB
EC
ECR
EO
EM
EP
FC
fDC
Ff
FH
Fl
FV
FS
FW
o
G8
Gll
OM
IICR
HP
INV
IRR
JT
JP
LD
Lf'
LO
LOL
IIAX
lIH
IIIN
(N)
P.
PI
PCC
PV1
PVC
HAD
RCP
RIll
R/W
S
SAP
S8D
SO
SDCO
$OR
SlP
ss
SSP
$$CO
Sf A
TC
TW
lYP
WII
W
_llONS
AGGREGATE BASE
ASPIW.T CONCRETE
AREA DRAIN
.GIN CUllY[
.GIN CUllY[ RETURN
BACK Of CURB
BACK Of w.wc
CATCH BASIN
ClASS
CRAWL SPACE E1LVAnoN
IlECI( DRAIN
ROOf DOWN SPOUT
IlRIVEW'AY
ElCISllllG
EU:CTRIC BOX
END Of CUllY[
END CUllY[ RETURN
ElCISllllG GRADE
ElECTRICAl. IIEI[R
EDGE Of PAYElIENT
FAa: Of CURl E1LVATION
FIRE DEPAIITIIENT CONNECllON
FINISHED FlOOR E1LVATION
FIlE Il'IDRAHT
FLOW UNE ELEVATION
FORCE IlAIII UNE
FINISIfEI) SUIlf'ACE ELEVATION
FIlE WATER UNE
GAS UN[
GIWJ[ lIREAK
GRATE ELEVATION
GAS IlETEIl
--
IIGIl POINT
IIlVEIIT ELEVATION
_TION
JOIfT TRDlCH
JOlIIT PIlLE
lANDSCAPE DRAIN
UNEAII FnT
UP Of GUTTER
LAYOUT UNE
IWCIIIUII
IIANIlOlE
_II
NEW
PA\/DIEHT ELEVATION
PIlU. BOX
f'OIl'/1NlD CEIIEIfT CONCRETE
POIllT Of VERTICAl. INTERSECTION
POlYVINYL CHI.ORIDE
IWlIIlS
~ CONCRETE PIPE
11III ELEVATION
~ Of WAY
SLOPE
sa ARCHITECTURAl. PlAN
STDllII SUI DRAIN
STDllII IIRAIN
STORII DRAIN ClEANOUT
SEE GEOTECHNICAl. REPORT
sa LANDSCAPE PlAN
SANITARY SEWER
SEE STRIICTlI1W. PlANS
SANITARY SEWER CI.EANOUT
STA~
TOP Of CURB
TOP Of WALl. E1LVATION
TYPICAL
WATER IIETEIl
DOIIESTIC WATER UNE
~
REF.
NORTH
o 40 80
I I I
GRAPHIC SCAU:
....... A
...--
U.JL: sa-u-1'4
SURVEYOR NOTES:
UTIUTY NOTE:
'tHE U1IJlIES SIfOIMlI ON 1HIS PLAN ARE DERMD FFKIII SUllf'ACE DBSERVA1KIN QN..Y. AClUAL
lOCAlICIC NIIJ SIZE. 1OGE1HER 'mH 1HE PRfSEHCE CF Nt( ADDrnONAL U1IJIY LIES NOT ~
ON 1HIS PI.M. SHAll. BE \IERFEI) If. THE FELD BY mE CON1RAC1OR 1XJRIfC. CCICS'IRtJC1Jtt
COPYRIGHT NOTE:
COPYRIGHT 0 CHAPPEI.L SLIR\€'I'IC SEIMCES ALl RIGHTS RESEIMD. NO PNrT fF MS DRA-.G
YAY BE REPRODUCED BY P'HOTOCQPVIC. ~ OR BY Ntr 01J.ER MEANS. (It STDRED.
PROCESSED OR 'IIWrISIII11ED Ie (II BY NfY COIIVIER OR D1tER SYS1EMS .-ntOIJT 1HE PRtDR
RT1EN PERMISSKlN Of' otAPPEll. SUIM:'YIC SER\'ICES. COPIES OF MS DRAW<<; IIfIHOUT AN
OAIGItAL SlGHA1lIIE AND STAUP JIIE. NOT VMJD.
LEGEND
SITE PLAN
.scALE; ,.=....0.
PROPERTY UNE
EASEIIENT
STORII DRAIN
fIRE WATER UNE
DOIIESTIC WATER UNE
SANITARY SEWER UNE
SUIDRAIN UNE (SGR)
WATER IIETER
STORII DRAIN INLET
AREA DRAIN
lANDSCAPE DRAIN
STORII DRAIN ClEANOIIT
SANITARY SEWER ClUNOUT
fiNISHED GRADE
fiNISHED SURFACE
DIRECTION Of SLOPE
TREE NOTE:
TIEE T'IPES .vi) mE ME. Felt: INFtRtAlICtW. PURPOSES ON..Y. AClUAL 1"IPE CF lREE. 1AEE
SHAPE. AND ~ CCIHFIQJRAlICII WAY VARY ADII AClUAL FEl.D CCII01IONS. NO WMRNnES
ME. IA.ED II AECMI) TO 1REE 1NFDRIU.1KIL
~-
AI
-
BENCH MARK:
USGS BENCH IIIMK: U 1122
ElEVAlKJI:201.48 FEET (ELEVA,1DC PER aTY OF aJPERlK) BEN01 t.IARK US1)
BRCINZE DISK II TCP OF' a.RI AT 1HE NORnftEST CORNER OF HOMES1'EAD ROAD ",., DE NQA
ON 11m PCMT Of' 0JR8 NEAR CATCft rwM.
TITLE NOTE:
REfERENCE 1IllE REPORT,
AUINlCE 1I1lE
ID'I CMFISI WAY. SLllE lDO
CAII'IIEll. CA _
IIIlER _ "4l5Ol5-"'HlA
DAlE: DEt:EIIBER 12. 2005
~_.
ON-strr "POMOUS .lRn.
EJw
....
0-
0"
0_
0_
.....
. II ...
-----
EXISTIIlG:
STIlUCIUIlE = '8,2DO SO. fT.
HARDSCAPE = 38,7DO SO. fT.
TOTAL = 5&.100 SO. fT.
PROPOSED:
STIlUCIUIlE = 11,800:1: SO. fT.
HARDSCAPE = 38,300% SO. fT.
TOTAL = 58,100:1: SO. fT.
BASIS or BEARINGS:
THE 8EARIrIO NQRlH 89"52"2'- EAS1' OF 1tE' CEN1ERl..R OF VARIAN ORNE AS SAID CEN1ERUNE
AHII SAID EIEARINC ME. SH<*f ON lHAT CER1JrIA PARCEl WAP RECtRJfD IN BOCI( 4ft OF YAPS
AT PAGE JI. SMTA Q.ARA COUN1Y RECORDS. WAS TAKEN AS 1HE BASS CF BEARINCS SHOIIiI ON
llIS ......
LOCATION MAP
.x.Mi; M.T.s.
--
-~~
I
II
II
I I ,
I I I
I I I
I II I
I!I ,
'lr' I
I I I
, I I
I , I
T I I
-- -T-Ff
I I I
I , I
I , I
I I I
I I I
I
I
I
I':. ..-
JE.,:::v.w.
t..:q& -f I
,..... I
I '1
, "
SHEET INDEX
.HEI..l&
C-I
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
IlESCRIP1lON
TIlU SHEET/SITE PLAN
IIIPROYElIENT PlAN
EROSION CONtROl PUN
EROSION CONlROL DETAILS
BEST _EHT PIlACt1CES
PRELlIllNARY EARTHWORK 0UAIlTlTIES SHOWN ON
THESE PlANS AIlE APPROXIllATE ESltIIATtD 0UAIlTlTIES
AND AIlE F'IIRNlSHEIl FOR THE CITY Of CUPERTINO'S
1IlFORIIA1tOII ONLY. THE lIUAIITIT1ES HAVE BEEN
CALClII.ATtD fROII EXISTING GROUNIl ELEVAltONS,
IIAS[II ON TOPOGRAPHIC AND SURYEY I/AP BY
CIW'PELL SUIlYEYING SEIMCES, 10 THE GRADES
SHOWN ON THESE PlANS, WITH STANDARD
ASSUIII'TIONS. THE ACTUAL AIIOUIlT IIAY VARY
DEPENDING ON COIIPACTION, CONSOUDATION,
STJlIPPtNG AND THE CONttlACTOlIS IIETltOD Of
OPERATION.
EARTHWORK SUIIIIARY: CUT 500 CY
FlU. aso CY
IIAlANCE 350 CY IIIPORT
TOTAL IIOVED 1350 CY
JIllIE:
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORIIED BY CHAPPEllE SURVEYING
SERYlCES ON ON fEIIRUARY 7, 2006 (APN 1:326-33-tlO).
~
....
~
5 E
III 0
.0 ~iC.!
~-J>C~
:z~~~.
~ O'........~..E
~<C(rooao
Qo:;:;:i
"'w......g.
~~.!..!.o
~~~:;~
Q ~ O''O'-E
O~"'lI)O
~Q1~~g.
;i
(/)
I-
Z
W
~
w
>0
O~
a:::m
a.. <( <(
I- ~NU
I.U -z
I.U <( 0
J: Wwz
(I) !::: 0.- ~
(/) . Ei
I.U z a..
~ >- L{)::> ~
- a:::mu ....
I- <( .q- g
Zo Cl
-..... 2:
~ ~
.....J
W
a:::
a..
Ii::
loA
2:
~
o
j! ~ ~ I
.g I III ~
~
"
Q
.
"
.2
~
:
.;
~
SHffJ
C-1
or 5 SHEETS
JOB.: 0&018
~"0
,
.1~
so .~ so '" so . ~ fI'iI- 'Tl ,,'lit" ~ !M-'V// ..... FOUND CONCRETe
"r 8ASlS OF ~'~'N'~~ ~ F.:~",,,,,,,~ so F~:: so ~...., so- m:;;'--=--so . Yf:!! ~;'ll" /JONUMCNT IN HElL
li"" N89"52';:,'T" U~ PER " .,.,..... ""' w." If Dll1WlCE iz..I <>'," so iiJo.c-I g7," so Vrl7H DRILL HOLE
Sf. ~CIIY sr_ (N)SS CONN[C11ON =~... PCR(469~.J9)'
iii:"",,,. - ~07.;W PER CITY STANDARDS ~,,"" """""LH <:i \
"-fAi€"'221'" REDuCEo " ""__,, MARIANI DRIVE ~ - - ~ ~ -=-- -=- - =, ~ - _II. - - :0
1'= -~;F\ ~ ~ " J;;;~;"-~;:' '7~...".A_" ____~,~-I OO~ - ,
~t ." !'>>~: ~ ~,r... JE w",,' ':Jh;-- I
(/-------------------~:~~I:" - ~~~-' ,: 'T ~~ i ,.~~,~) ~-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~1e~' i
: T ~' ~'" ... --,I / , ~ ,!,:, t:' -:..: >-'.~ -" "': . ,----- \ . ;; - -- - :... -" ~ ill ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ . (~ ~ "-~' ~ __-- .fH:HIRECY.a:p/~ --- "in so........ :bE I ...." I hUt.5 lr:'.: = CA.. ~5Irao~)"'1'" 1~~c,Jlf... Ilr-" T~ ~
I i ~ --... so ~ ~ \,.. 230.4' x-:;:: ~ I I . 'F'" I {.If. ""'" ~ F" 1 ~~rn. ~ I I <d
: Pal .!l ,..~. I .:-..-__ '~n ~= r r P (l'lPICAIJ fLEd l..J:l h I ftt'.. i li~... I""" ::.-"I~
: OFFICE + ~- ,.. .". ~ ~-;:;122U He '-- t:+ ~ <L~I _ ........ ------11 ----, j flnLL ~ I I I :::-
: 4:;A~~/39 (" :~ ~;~ = _!! ~ ~~....m"" r ,Y;.~ 1'F'=:w--'ft. , oi "ifiliiWo Y": ~: ~,t\ t.a uu~-.zv ~...' ::~i1 ~,~ ,I I I
I A.P.N.: 326-33-1f9 . ~ '"~ :!e"- ~o3 ' ~. / / AL,r ~ ,J. . \ ANBJIN Y 'V. I I
I ".1tJ> . - -- -GRAij[I~.~ He Vll AL / 0 ~ (E)WA~.l.I I "u,\ : I I I I I
\ frE~l ~~ · · ~1J228.5 I~' He - .:: -/ ,)=," -l n~~ES~ L : .... ~ \ ~ fB'~ : : ~ I I I~' I'
\ ~. x t~ xiF" ";;, -_ "'r x"." ~ FS~'*~!(t!QP.. ..... I -s;~ /~X.. fRio"'~.\r I ClI I
lrJ J!!!l '=9.3 .;:. ~~- 11M' r-i-\f\Ji1/1 S1 1t.1'-'~ "? ,;--r..-~~. ~~ I Q: ~c
..! _/) ~, I,...... ~ ~ "" ..."t tJ':" S~-""j I ~ Ilr-" I I
A-SA ... ~roo -00 I /( -62a:b -o( ~"1 ",/1 : ... 1/ - ,.... He FS ~ - If 1M' 1taJ' 1;,' P'''<'V''l-' , i~ lr-":::: f
APPROVA~-'~.:a.~O~ rl ; !t~:+ 231 ~ :f.- ~ -- m ~.'-: · ~ ''''\7 IZI - . .;If[....--~-w:: :::.~ I~: ,I I~
I . .-i 21 Ft- INlET 1iI.... - _ aEC F I II .M..... 1 I'''''' C .... k:- I :'( ,~
I 1 .... ~, 1R22903 1i't~)1 ., "../ ~'" ~":., I 'l/BIcv /r.;P \':; :- I ~ I I '"
[,....L 1 /1 1_ .. I~ \t ,.!._ r' U I ( ~ - ,.. If I g Q.. ~ p
\ Plnnnlng ~l)"'lUissl:", - - 0 It) U :\..., II \ ~ + fl p.!. .''- - , ~ if ..., Ir- I loJ I I ~
".1. A>>i."'"",. :5 L "" .. ~ ~P~r: VAUl :rE P6II' ] PARCE! B [] [] '<:~..... Ut ,,' ~.. ,.. .,., 'F"' I ClI I.
,. V'''' .. Da- ____ 1--:1 "" r FS2iU"1 ~ '- .)" ~ ~ I 10'P./J~ I
, ClU' C-.WI f(;-/5 - O~ .:=;. 'I ~* :l'IV ~~=t;,;~ - 0 ..., : A,P,":.; :::!33'!."O I ":.g:. - ~;. <!:.... I r- I "-I'
I .... PEP "'~z Jr ~~lIlAlI. P IIYIJ ~ \! ...... ..., Ii' I
r n (\ IMli ~- - ..-- 1+--.... "-"--'--,. · Ii''' -=..-= , - " I I
~ '-.LLr- <' := ,'" . l _ _ I ./ <; ~ \... N....'I.. ... " ,,,.... - n I I I ,
I SignaiUl" .fj ~ i--J-JIllD I :-; n +........ C~~1W'1' \'1 __u. .. J-' [ M~....f!;! ~ ~""~ I I I I
ClIICal. l..... I-~, __" ~II 220,'~ ,~ OOCKI" 1tUDCA:rE 'nr....~ mI--- ';.... I I ,
....cn ., ~~ ~ ,~~ ~ \='~ ~~~RDSn- (TYP) ow Vi
~ ~ """'- J...ilft' :'0 iiI . ..... l~ me <~." ' ! ~.ATER I
_ .. ---'i...iji - ,us_ ~ m ~"@ I ....-./...... S ~~ t
~ ( ..... x~~ xiii.!' x~ I!;V ~ 1 'lr,; .ftl1,JIJ ,... W"
..,..-"".h'" Yd:! i~ ~\"\s:iIl'i.: ISiU ';.~:;.. .......~yi!=... ~.. ii~~--~4'---
\..,.\ ...11 '\ \ \ \0 ~:::i \ \ \ T\ 1;. ~ ,:,:.~~ -~..."- .._.:f.- ...... ,F'w.",..,.;, 1~ J. f>" . I I : I'
CURVE TABLE "---" ~ f----' I ~ '--mil l *r II! :: , I I
CURVE: RADIUS OaTA ENCTH PARCEL A I I I ~ I I
C, 73,00' 6'48'25" 8.67" 584 MAPS 23&:24 SIDEWALK EASE/JENT AS i IS' .... I I
C2 73,00' 16'41'57" 21,28' A.P,N.: 326-33-114 SH~IIH ON 584 II 2J4'241 I ~I I I
C3 57,00' 16'41'57" 16,61' , I I ...... I
C4 30.00' 90'02'07" 47.14' I SO' EASE/JENT! I \/B: I I I
:~~~~ ~jrP I I I I
I PER BOOK F867, OR PG 600 I
I AS SHO'MI ON 584 /J 2>>24 ~ I I I
(~ORT1ON OF I.E.E. 10 Bf ~Il ~ I li!tJ'
I I I ~ @ iE''' I E"
SIOCWALX EASE/JENT AS 10' I I
SHO'MI ON 584 II 2J4'24IP.U.E. I
I I I I I I I
)911!!i
:a:
"iiI'~
H.....
loW"
Hru~
--
-~...
n3l":22S.1
.~so
so
FOUND .J" BRASS DISK
IN /IONUUENT lIEU
"CITY OF CVPERTINO"
so
f @/::'ou,u- - - - 1."'''
55 ss s:s-~-ss
B
x"",.
'"
~
~
)..
loJ
~
Q!i
,
I
, ~
I
REF,
I NORTH
I 0 20 40
l I I
GRAPHIC SCALE
IMPROVEMENT
~ 1"-20'
PLANS
'"
o
'"
~
S E
1Il 0
...;o-..~~
=>o...><e
2:~~~:
S!at...............c
4(,ot~~~
Qu........
"'w....a.
~ ~ t!..!.&
o~....o
:X::;:'" "'i
o :J 0'0'1:
~!i:2~&.
-0)'-........0
;i
(j)
J-
Z
W
~
W
(f) >~
Z O...J
'<( e:::: CD
-I 0..... <( <(
Q. ~NU
---z
I-- <( ~
ZWI..LJ~
lU 1-,." - II)
~ -~t- L..I
< (j) 0::-
lU 'W E
:> za.. 0..
o >- It)::> ~
a:: e:::: m U -'
Q. <(.q- :::!
~Zo :I:
--...... ~
~ i'i
.....J
W
e::::
0.....
Ii:
L..I
:z
~
o
.
.! ~ .i ..
.. ~ .. ..
0 " .
~ 1Il ~
.
;g
.
"
.!!
.!!
>
.:
.;
:z:
SHErr
C-2
OF" 5 SHEETS
JOB : 0&018
BAStS OF BEARINGS
N89'S2"24'E
~_ 'IIWR 10 I[
~&~~..~~ ..
~ om:\ _~ "';^,,,-X ~WV ~'E l\ _______
/~--------------------~---~~-~-~;- . ~~~b' ~fljf""7;~~~)(""
/ ~~II ~I ::,foo 2-
I l ~ : I "R J'.~ . ,.... . ~I ~
':..\, ~ I ,
CONSTRUCTION TRASHlRECYctEJ
~ /! ENTRANCE "'-~ :
I LI ~ ~\ n n :
PARCEL A ,~ -j ~ ^ HC
469 MAPS 39 '~i I : ~
A.P.N.: 326-33-1 9 :j -ttt :It HC
'5 fI '-( ~
II ~J= 1
i
~ "ciloDh-DlP rR-~OOh-O
APPRO.' Ali Jl ~ .:Imh - Ole
I : ..............
\ """"I", C"D~ltalssICJn 1-J 1- Db
I I R:I.
I aO'CDlm~11 ! f6-/5-O~
I 0...
I h 0 ,r --IL
SignaalD! ~ -1'-'1]
! ('....'~I
v '-'
FOUND .J" BRASS DISK
IN IIONIJUENT IlfZL
"OTY OF aJPF:RTINO"
o 1= - -=- - -=- - -----=- -
I
I
~
ii:
l::l
)..
loJ
~
~
I
I ~
,
I REF.
NORTH
0 20 40
I , , I
I GRAPHIC SCALE
~7.~' ~..-
-------=-..~ .. .. -~=--
ss ss- ! .?
-~s ~~---------:~-
EN1'RANCE ,./ ,fT MIl ' \ 1 _ '{;J
.~... / _ ,- -- -___. I ~I /""" l l;{d "-': ~
~",.--\ f 34232' - _'i. ..... ~
~~.'" '\ -- -1 i ~"...:~.~=? c"....,~_=_,~o ~
T\ ~ ;'--::~SfT:__kL.",-- \r--~~~
~ ,
C~E ~-~ G-- ~1 In
~"" · ~~r; ,--;"'~mm~__-~>-niNf~'L!
,. oW ~~ -,~\ ~7 i'" (
,~ I ,-'1: \ :~ ·
._~.Fm~ .tr ~I ~li ~Cf ji~\
l)CIJ ~~ I, Ie ,~',., ~ 1\\11
~ / V n I: n ~ & nun' JI
IX1 .,.... L SIGNAil(IE n B u' Ii
)<&-.... V ~ DE ) -L U u '
,J aEC l .~... 2J "\ ~-_4, ~
x..... -( _*,_V:
,n )' ~..~46fi\ 391
\ ~ V I
" -!-' ~ ~, :
'\
\
1
~
/
ORIWWA Y
'\J
..~..
'Y
--- '\
HC
r
HC
STRAW ROUS OMIII' (il:
AT SAWCUT ""AIN~ -:
I I .;:
<> ~=t u
I II ~
III~
SU....CE ~- ---IT------ 1------ ~.
STRAW ROUS ~'G1 I
AT SAWCUT . L-I-
LJ ='- ~ _lP'\ =.,
(l'lV_._ . ~~.
, . _, . '- , _. . 'S" .r_' . ."!:ll1.
\'t\Yt_'t/~
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RAOlUS DEL TA lENGTH
CI 7. <,lIfO' 6'48'25' 8,67
C2 73.00' ,6",'Sr 21_28'
CJ 57,00' 16'41'5r 16,61'
C4 30,00' 90T!2'Or 47. 14'
1lOIlMII(nI')
Ar'"
,.. ~
-..v.
'Iii>
}
~
(, UQ......
~ /
r=\"'"
I \
1. \ I
~
li
MARIANI DRIVE
..
tn' ,>I,.
.,fER 48,\ MAPS 39
J
PARCEL B 0
469 MAPS 39
A.P.N.: 326-33-110
o
I
~
~
~
~
J
JIl
~
TREE PROll:~~' I
'-
I
r(c
!l
\
\
n
n
~
~.I=..:,,",-, -,
N89'S2'24'E
~
____ ,.. IlfP
._,-,-,-,~, ,=
------.., !':- . -'.- -
0:;;._........ '"......l KID ~ ~.~ )
IS'D 15'D I -rT illY
.r\,~<"'\. ~ _ J-. ... :L-I &1
PARCEL A : l: ~
584 MAPS 23~24 SlDEWAJJ< EASEMF:NT AS i IS" ~
SHO'I/N ON 584 /I 23.1:24j I
A,P.N.: 326-33-114 I I ,
I
I SO' EASFJIENT I !
II FOR LANDSCAPlNGJI1i!/~.11ON
AND INGRESS AND E:GRESS
I PER 8{)(}/( F867, OR PO 600
I AS SHO'I/N ON 584 /I 23.1:24
(~ORT1ON OF J.E:.E:. ro Bf -;a'OIl 0)
kEwALK EASEllp.JT A'" ! 10'
$HO'I/N ON 584 /I 23.1:24fP,UL
I I I
. -~-' '"':'-'
(-J6ZO;: .~
.~
14~ ASH
".
""ASH
,..
1'. ASH
,..
r-
r ~J..-______
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND:
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
~ 1"=20'
------
_1_1_1_
~
STRAW ROLLS
SILT FENCE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
NOTE:
NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES WILL BE PERt.AmED
TO ENTER SITE BY WAY OF DE ANZA BOULEVARD.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) TO BE LOCATED ON
t.AARIANI DRIVE ONLY.
FOUNO CCNCRE:TE:
IIONIJIIENT IN IlElL
MTH DRILL HOLE
__US) ~
L___ -
I 90.04'
I
I
I
I
!
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I l::ll I
I ~I I
I ~I I
I Q:l1 I
I ~I I
1:1 I
I l::ll I
I I I '
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
oJ. I I ,
I I I I
----- nm-l-___J____~-n- r
N89'S:. '24'E I (0.48"1 ,
, I I I
I I I
I I I ,
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
'"
o
'"
l::!
5 E
VI 0
"
~~d)('f!
~ ~ C~ I
> -
-lI('o(~~~
Q(,)""~.
Q::l,j'......g.
~~.l.lo
~i~~~
o ::; ~O'c
~~:2:g8.
- ... '-''- a
;I
IY
(f)
I-
Z
w
Z:::E
w
~>C
-JO>
ll.. ..J
a:::m
-JQ...
O'""'ll::::<(<(
rv ..c,NU
......-Z
I-- <(-
Zw 0
O I.&J Z
1-,....- VI
O _L..I~ L&.I
(f) o::~
oW
Z Zo-
O >- L()::> ~
- a::: 0) u
(f) <( ~ ;!
o Zo :r
a::: _ r- ~
~ :::E V!i
---I
W
a:::
Q...
I
,
I~
,~
I~
Ii:
L&.I
~
o
.! ! ii ..
a ti ...
Q .. "
-t:. VI ~
..
J!
a
Q
,
I
.
c:
.!!
.!!
>
.
II:
.;
Z
SHEET
C-3
OF 5 SHEETS
JOB : 0&018
STRAW ROLLS IIUST BE PlACED
ALONC SlOPE CONTOURS
I/tY1- -~C()b -()~ ,I? -0{0CJb -cq
APPROVAt U -~Cll:Y, -00
................
PIIl"";'" Conu:,issl,," 'Z-/I- of:,
~b:t
Ciu' COImcil e - J 5-00
Slgnaiure
Cct",
1. STRAW ROLL INSTAllATION R[QUlR(S THE PLACEWENT
AND SECURE STAKING or THE ROLL IN A TRlNCH. 3"
TO 5" (75 TO 125 IIU) Il[[p, OUG ON CONTOUR.
RUNOFT IIUST NOT BE AllOWED TO RUN UNDER OR
AROUND ROlL
VERTICAL SPACING FOR SlOPE INSTAllATIONS:
1:1 SI..OI'(S = 10 rm APART
2:1 SI..OI'(S = 20 f[[J APART
3: 1 SI..OI'(S = 30 f[[J APART
4:1 SLOPES = .co rm APART
3. INSPECT AND REPAIR STRAW ROllS AfTER EACH STORI.t
EYEJlT AND REIIO\IE SElIIII(NT WHlN NECESSARY.
4. REIIDVED SEDIII(NT SHAll. BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA
THAT WILL NOT CONTRIII\IT[ SEDllIENT OfF -SIT[ AND
CAN BE P[RIIANENTlY STABlUZED.
@ ,.JOtttYcCl.l.1AH
STRAW ROLLS
NOT TO SCALE
STORM DRAIN POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES:
1. PROTECT DOWN SlOPE DRAINAGE COURSES, STREAIIS AND STORII DRAINS WITH ROCK FILLEO
SAND BAGS, TEIlPORARY DRAINAGE SWALES, SILT FENCES, EARTH BERMS. STORIot DRAIN INLET ALTERS
ALTERS AND/OR STRAW BALES USED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROPERLY INSTAllED SILT FENCES.
2. A STABlUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHAlL BE INSTAllED PRIOR TO THE INCEPTION or
ANY WORK ON-SITE, AND SHAlL REMAIN IN PlACE UNTIL THE COIIPLETION or AlL
LANDSCAPING. EXISTING DRIVEWAY IIAY BE USED AS CONSTRUCTIOII ENTIlANCE.
3. STRAW ROU(S) SHAll. BE INSTAlLED PRIOR TO THE INCEPTION Of ANY WORK ON-SITE, AND
SHAlL REIIAIN IN PLACE UNllL THE LAN~tNG GROUND COVER IS INSTAllED.
4. DRY SWEEPING lIETHODS SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE ANY DEBRIS AND/ OR SOIL TRACKED ON TO
UNIVERSITY AVENUE. DRY SWEEPING SHAlL BE DONE AT THE END or EACH WORK DAY.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll. fOLLOW AND USE BEST IIANAGEIIENT PRACTICES CBMP) fOR DISCHARGE
INTO THE ClTY'S STORY WATER SYSTElI DURING SITE STRIPPING, HAULING, EARTH IIOV1NG
ACTMTIES, HEAVY EQUIPIIENT OPERATIONS, GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SITE
SUPERYlSlOll, PAINTING. APPUCATIONS AND USE or SOLVENTS AND ADHESIVES. LANDSCAPING
AND GARDENING.
6. STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHAlL BE COVERED WITH \/ISQUEEN OR A TARPAUUN UNTIL THE
MATERIAL 15 RDIOVEIl F1lOU THE SITE. ANY REWAINING BARE SOIL THAT E10STS AfTER THE
STOCKPIlE HAS BEEN RDIOVED SHAlL BE COVERED UNTIl A NATURAl GROUND COYER IS
ESTABUSHm OR IT MAY BE SEEDED OR PLANTED TO PROVIDE GROUND COVER PRIOR TO THE
fAlL RAINY SEASON.
7. ONCE THE PROPOSED ON-SIT[ DRAINAGE INLETS HAVE BEEN INSTAllED. THE CONTRACTOR
SHAll. PROTECT ANY BARE SOIL F1IOIiI ENTERING THE INLETS BY INSTAWNG ALTER fABRIC
UNDER THE INLET GRATES. THE ALTER fABRIC SHAlL REIIAIN UNTIl NATURAl GROUND COVER
IS ESTABUSHED.
8. DUST CONTROL SHAlL BE DONE BY WATERING.
9. If EROSION DEVELOPS IN A TEIIPORARY EROSION PROTECTED AREA OR ANY ESTABUSHED
VEGETATED AREA, THE CONTRACTOR SHAll. IIIIIEDlATELY AllEVIATE AND REMEDY THE PROBLEII
AND TAKE PREVENTATIVE MEASURES TO IIINIIIIZE THE POSSIBIUTY OF ITS REOCCURRENCE AND
ALSO TO PREVENT THE RESULTING FLOW or SOILS OR WATER WITH SUSPENDED SOILS rROII
GETTING INTO THE ClTY"S DRAINAGE SYSTElI OR ANY NATURAl DRAINAGE CHANNEL OR DITCH.
10. AlL DISTURBED SOIL SHALL BE "MATTED" AND SEEDED WITH'N TWO (2) WEEKS or "ANAL
DISTURBANCE".
25' WI. TO EP
CIIICI al.
~ IEXlSlING ROAD
r~_\ ~
~':::"':":O::::':':::::':'I -
-----
, 4"_
EXISIIIlG GROUND
F1lJER fAIIRIC
.IillII:
t. PROVIDE A fANNED STABlUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO ACCOIotIlOllATE THE TURNING
RADIUS OF CONS11lUCTlON EQUIPMENT ON AND OFf THE PUBUC STREET.
2. INSTAlL STABIUZED CONTRlICTION ENTRANCE ALONG HEW DWY CORRIDOR fOR THE fUll.
PROPOSED WIDTH.
3. RE-USE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE AS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WHEN POSSIBLE.
NOT TO SCALE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
fOR fURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
CITY Of CUPERTINO. CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
POIIDlNG NT.
l.'Ittglmny
~~.
. RUNOff
STANDARD DETAIL
TRENCH WITH NATIVE BAacnu.
PONDINC NT,
. RUNOFf
ALTERNATE DETAIL
TRENCH WITH GRAVEL
I-~-\
,--,( .../ -----',
I " _/ -\,
) .../\
/~\ "..- 1\')
;' ( / ..:;r-- EXISTING TREE
l, ! '\ ( /..., TO REMAIN.
/"'" l -" / )
! '---.-/ ///:
}...-, ---._~ /". 1
J i______ ..../\
l '--- -- ~
'"
<:>
'"
~
~ ~
w,o.........~~
~~E!~E
~ m '-...... ~
'OII("'l(ClOCfto.
ClO::::~
Q::tJ........g..
~~.!..!.O
o ~ "l"~ J!
:t::zW)tr).!
Q :J 0'0' c
O~II)II)O
~CD~~g.
PROTECTIVE fENCING
QifI
llQIES;
1. PROTECTIVE fENCING SHAU. BE BRIGHT
ORANGE POLYPROPYLENE Ft:NClNG.
2. NOT1lING INSIDE THE DRIPUNE AREA
SHAlL BE RAKED. CUT, STORED, OR
OTHERWISE DISTURBED.
ORIPUNE
PROTE ROOT
ZONE)
TREE PROTECTION
NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL
(/)
(f)1-
:::!Z
'<(W
....~
l&.JW
Q>o
~O~
0:::: CD
~ 0...<(<(
.... ~NU
O-z
Z <(0
Wwz
-.J 1-,... - (!)
0-......1- I.J
n:: (/) . e:i ~
.... z a.. ~
Z >- I{):::> ~
OO::::o1u ~
O<!-.t ~
ZZ~ ~
Q::E ~
(f)-
0-1
n::W
l&.J0::::
0...
TREE PROTECTION NOTES'
t. PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION, IMCWDDlG OYERNAIIGING IlRAIICHES AND ROOTS F1lOII
COIlPACTION AND DAIIAGE DURING IlATERIALS STAGING AND CONSTIlIICTION. TREHCHING
AIIJAClNT TO AND WITHIN TREE DRlPUNES TO BE DONE BY HAND TO AVOID ROOT _GE.
If RlI01S LARGER THAN ONE (1) INCH DIAlIETEIl ARE ENCOUNTERED, ALERT lANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. _GE TO ANY EXISTING PlANTS OR PlANTS TO REIIAIN ARE TO BE REPLACED
AT TIlE EXPENSE Of THE CONTRACTOR. PROTECT TREES WITH fDUIl (4) fOOT PLASTIC
IIESH Ft:NCING AS SHOWN ON PlAN.
2. DO NOT PARK VEHICU:S OR STORE IlATERIAlS OR EQUJPlIENT WITHIN THE DRlPUNES or
EXISTING TREES TO RElIAIN.
3. WHERE IT IS HECESSARY TO EXCAVATE ADJACENT TO EXISTING TREES, THE CONTRACTOR
SHAU. USE CARE TO AVOID INJURY TO TREES AHD TREE ROOTS.
4. ND TREE ROOTS GREATER THAN ONE (1) INCH IN DIAlIETER IlAY BE CUT DURING THE
PERfORllANCE or DEIIOUTION WORK, INSTAllATION OF UTIlITIES OR CONSTRUCTION or
FOOTINGS.
5. WIlEN TREE ROOTS ARE ENCOUHTERED DURING EXCAVAnON, THEY SHAll. BE CAREf1ILLY
UNCOVERED AND THE ADJACENT IlATERIAL REIIOVED WlTHOUT ROOT DAIlAGE, AfTER WHICH
THE EXCAVATION SHAll. BE IIIUEDlATElY BACKF1UEIl.
6. EXCAVATION SHAll. BE DONE BY HAND IN AREAS WHERE TWO (2) INCH AND lARGER ROOTS
OCCUR, AND IN AREAS WITHIN THE DRIPUNE or EllISlTNG TREES TO RElIAJIl.
7. ROOTS TWO (2) INCHES AND LARGER IN DlAIIETER. EXCEPT DIRECTLY IN THE PATH or PIPE
OR CONDUIT, SHAll. BE TUNNElED UNDER AND SHAU. BE HEAW.Y WRAPPED WITH BURlAP
TO PREVENT SCAIlRlNG AND EXCESSIVE DRYING.
8. WHERE A DITCHING IlACHINE IS RUN CLOSE TO TREES HAVING ROOTS SIlAUEJl THAN TWO
(2) INCHES IN DIAlIETER, THE ROOTS SHAlL BE HAND TRIIIlIED AT THE WAlL OF THE
TRENCH.
9. WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBlE TO AVOID CUTnNG RlI01S GREATER THAN ONE (1) INCH IN
DIAIIETER. THE OWNER'S IlEPRESDlTATIVE SHALl. BE NOTIf1ED. AND THE WORK SHAlL BE
DONE ONLY BY A DUAlJAED ARBORIST. ROOTS OF TREES SHAll. BE CUT USING ClEAN.
SHARP PRUNING TOOlS. ROOTS SHAll. NOT BE BROKEN OR TORN LEAVING RAGGED ENOS.
10. ClOSE TRENCHES ADJACENT TO TREES WITHIN 24 HOURS. If THIS IS NOT POSSIIII.E, KEEP
SIDE or TRENCH ADJACEHT TO THE TREE SHADED Wl1H BURlAP OR CANVAS.
1 t. CONTINUAl. PUDDUNG OR RUNNING or WATER IN THE VICINITY or TIlE TREE SHAll. BE
AVOIDED.
Ii::
I.J
~
o
j! J
o ~
Cl N
~
4; vi
'0 ,.:
~ z
~
.g
~
1. INSPECT AND REPAIR fENCE oIFltR EACH STORII EVEN
AHD REIIOVE SEDIIIEIlT WIlEN IECESSARY.
2. REIIOVED SEDIIIEIlT SHAll. BE DEPOSITED TO ..... AREA
THAT Will. HOT COHTRIBUlE SEDIIlENT OFf-SIT[ AHD
CAN BE PERllANENTI.Y STAIIlUZED.
3. SILT FENCE SHAU. BE PlACED ON SlllPE COIITDUlIS
TO IlAlCIlllZE PONIlOOl EF1'lCIOlC't.
..
"
J!
~
:
i
NOT TO SCALE
SILT FENCE DETAIL
SH~E:T
C-4
OF' 5 SHEETS
JOe.: 08-01&
In the Santa Clara Valley, storm drains flow
directly to our local creeks, and on to San
Francisco Bay, with no treatment.
Storm water pollution Is a serious problem for
wUdllfe dependent on our waterways and for
the people who live Mar polluted streams or
bayIancIs.
Proper management of construction sites
reduces poDutIon significantly.
ThIs sheet summarizes the "Best Management
Practices- (BlIPs) for storm water pollution
on.
ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FOR NONPOINT SOURCE POUUTlON
& WATERCOURSE PROTECTION:
Chapter 9.18
'.18.040 DIachIIge Inlo the S1arm dnIIn prohIbI18d
It 18 oolawfullo diIcharge. or cause, allow, or permit to
be dIlIc:h8rgecI inlD IIllY storm drain or naIuraI outlet or
channel d MIte, Including but not restrlcl8d to. sewage,
1ndu8trlIIl-. peIroIeum productll, COlIIlar or IIllY refuM
aubsIln:e IIIi8lng from 1he rnanufacIure of gas from coal or
petroleum, chemicals, deIeIgents, soMnls, painIs,
..40"'.';' odIt.d or c:IdorlnatIld swimming pool wallIlr.
p8lllicIdes, herbICides and f8ftiIlz8ts.
'.18.080 VIaIatIon
Any penon who vloI8tea any pIOVIsion of lhilI chapter 18
qulIty of a 1lIlsder.-1OI and upon convlction thereof ahal
be pooIahed .. provided in Chaplar 1.12 of lhilI code
1.1'.100 ClvII penaJty for violation
My penon who vioIabos any provI8lon of 1hI8 chapter
or IIllY PflNI8Ion d any permit Issued pursuant to IIlI8
chapter IhaII be c:IvIIy liable to the CIly in a sum not to
....-d the 8ll'ICU1Cs pIl>\/IdfId for in Gov.mIent Code
SeclIon 547.40 and/or 547.40.5 [up to $25,000 per day per
vIoIalIonJ. The CAy may petition the SuperIor Court
puISlBll to Govelrmenl Coda Secllon 54740 to impoee.
__ !WId recowr such sums. The cMI penalty pIl>\/IdfId
In lhIal8Ction 18 amJIalMt and not exclusive, and shaI be
in addIIan to aB Olhar remedies available to 1he city under
StIlle and FedenlIIaw and local onllnances. Fundi
coIIacled punIU8RI IIllhls I8Ction ahaI be paid to Clly's
EnvIronmenIIII MalIll98l.l8Ilt Account.
'.11.101 CIvIl penaJty for DIIcIt cII8chargM
My penon who cII8chargea poIIulanla. In vIoIalIon of
lhIs chapter. by 1he .... of Dcil COl.l8cliot.. ahaI be cIvIIy
Iiable.lIl1he City in a un not to ucaad -.ty-llve
tI1o-.d doIan plII' day per violation for -=h day in
whlch such vioIalIan occtn, The CIly may peIlIion 1he
SuperIor Court puraunlo Government Coda SeclIon
547.40 to impose. _ and I8CCMlr such 8UIRlI. The civU
penalty pruvtded In lhIs I8Ction Ia cumuIIIlIve and not
axckI8ive, and 8halI be In addIlian III aB other ramedIes
available to the CAy under stale and Fedarallaw and ID\:al
onllnances. Foodt coIIacled pursuant IIllhla &ec\k>R shall
be paid 10 Cly's EnvironmanlaI StDrm Managemant
Account.
Cupol1lno
BuIIdIR. Dept:
4....717-122.
Public Work. D.pt:
."-771-13"
Santa Cla,a County
Roc)'cno. HoUln.,
...-111....1..
... nd.e....~ or.
_'11II:_ nlCvcla.taff co..
s..n........ Hazardoue W..t.:
4..-2....73..
Cupertino a..lury ae.e, Dlat,
401.111-1.71
Sanu Cla,a van.,. Ur.ban Runoff
Pollution PreYentlon Prsrm
....714.2..2
Stehl Offlc. of Em o..onc)'
aenlc..
1......52.711. (24 hra)
Report .plll. to 911
APPROVED BY:
~~JR~~
DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS
~
I. 14.{)
DATE
General
Construction
and Site
Supervision
Stonn DraIn Pollution from
Construction Activities
ConItruction .... .. commort IOWCeI of Itofm
-_._ond_...._or
wall Into _Ibm cAIn. guMIr. or.... haw _
_Im_...___"""",.
As . COIIImc:Ior. fW ... eupII'YiIor. owner or
opeN_ of..... ,.. ..., bIi .......... for
----...-
aubcoaIrIIcIIHe or.....,....
Gen.ral Principles
o Keep an ordlorfy sitlI and ensure good
hou$ekeeptng practices are used.
0_..___.
o Coyer m........ when they.. not in UK.
[J Keep m...... away front...., tkInn
--~-,
o EnMn duet control...... doanl INw"" or
--.......-.
Advance PlaDn/Itg To Pnwent_
o llchoduIo_Oftd......._
......,__T._IOI_.
_"""""'---"'or___
___....... UoeIhe_.ntI
_Cor*oI-,__""
R-.ot-~"",*",_.a
-
0_..._...-..-._-
(.........,....._....... __ or
.........,.or_~_..
----.......-
---..--
___or__
-
o Traln1OW...-r-......'1I~ L.......
Tlloclll'.....____
..... fDrJDU IocIiIIrIMD to Wofbq. JCU"
-....---
-..----
own~. u.e,.,.",., few. CINn
".,..._---
'- guIde_oI_B-.gDopl_.
Painting and
Application of
Solvents and
Adhesives
lllDnn llIWn PoIuIIan from PIdnls,
SoIvenIiI, and AdI-avw
..--...--
~1hII_""''>>''''mlaclll1
_..._.....,....._0-..
T_chen*aI&.,~....... car.....
padII::Ia carbm............ ClI'.........
-...--...-.-
ttIauIdbt~.... po.IIIe..~d
-..-----
__........ _WIIIIiIR:ana
~--
0_"_____
--..-.-....-
-
-... CIooooItI
o ...cIIm.......or...... peInt
............ ...... ....... ..... .......
F..............
0""___"'_"
.......,......,........_.,.....
.............. .-..,._.
tl ....___...__....
..... poIIIIiIn dIM........ar
....... ~............ and.......
___tl__..
....... ............
o -_d17,__...._
--"'--......
-....-
.,'~,
Good HouaeIcHp/ng__
o =-.-===.=-pwblg.
_TIlo___.._
..., from......<< IIDnn chin 1nIett.. ~ If
-.or,_major_.._
o To__.........or__
---___,0..
pKMde a tile....,.....
o __out....._-..-_
COIUrIlNltan 81... IOUrCI. Cover upoeed ,... of
otIIor____lhoeIIngor
-.,y--.-.-....-
----....-..--
__or_
0_..-.""____
......., - __.......... lie..
-...-.
o CMn..-..........._._....-.
eolhey do notcone.m...... d<< ~Clf
--"'__.Uoo""'_
meIhoda ~ pouIbIe. If you muet "" wnw.
11M Jutt enough to keep the dust down.
Q CoY... and maintafn dum.....,.. Place dumps1ers
under roofs or cover with tarps or plastic sheeting
$eClRcI .ound the ouI:IkSe of the dumpster. Never
... out a dutnpSler by hoUlg. down on the
_do,
0___....,-___
.....__....__.....CMO
fnlquenIIy for_
...__ Handling
O___-___n
,..-..-,-........,.
0-,.__.__,_
.._,----
_.--_.-.....
wNcIe~~8UCh_UMdal,.
:--......ancllira:' _-- ......orr
o DIopOM....__,_...
-...--..-....-
-...............--.-
...,.............. or"'-"Ihem i'I 1INt...<<
.... a creek .1traIn bed.
,..""""
o .. -"-11I*I"'o-..-... _... you
"''-10_......_..._
-c--.Al:MJ__.
JOUf~..... ..............IoIaII.
.... or..... tnbmdon on e.e General PermI:
......--.. RogIono/-~
Cor*aI EIoMI. (ThII c:rIeriI .. chMgI: to one acre
.... _. 2llO3.)
Landseaping,
Gardening,
and Pool
Maintenance
Landac."".._ __a_
o --.....-londac:lIplnam_
--.....-bJabq-u......
_or_pIooIIc~
o -......gnodlnO-__
d.....lh7_.
a u.. temporary cMc* d.... or dItcbN tD
dJwNI runoff tIWa'J ftom .1oIm dnIInS.
o Protect storm dralna with undbaoa. gravel.
fHftd bag.. straw wattlee, or olher sedment
eonlrole.
o Re-yegetaUon Ie an exeetient form of erosion
conb'olfor any .1Ie.
e S'IIl)f* peaUcides. feItiIzera. and oIhe..,
::-.._orln._orot_
o ::.::::-~..="
COI'IIaktera, -.ad use meew.r.. PfOduct.
~of_,empty_......
_, DiopOMofu__..
--,
[J InC--'___,""'Jdina
=~-=:.":.=
.ncl_bJlhec:ly'._,
R...... aN encourwoect to compott
_"'-_0'_
_.. '__.w11 be
_.
o~__
- cIppInlIf - "",,,,",,-
"'---prd
- (IIFra~_ond
Zahk...Rd._....",.'->,
[J Do aot blow or rake ...... illto
....-
Storm Drain Pollution
from Landscaping and
Swimming Pool Maintenance
....,.................- - -...
-..-.....--e-
_wIInmofllnlotho___
:"::==conIllIning--
---~--...
--..-........ _, Thuo__..
_10............
PooIIFountaltllSpa _aln""an""
_In",.....,. 01"'''''
WNn W. Urn. to drain. pool. ... or fountain.
pINM be sure to call the Cupltttino SenIIIry
06Itrict beforI; you .tart for further guidance on
__ _, _provonllon, ond
handling ~I cleaning waste (such 8$ acid
wash). Discharge flows should be kept to the low
levels typically possfble through a garden ho$e.
~....85 maybe prohl)iled by local
o _..dilchargo pool 0'_ _10.
-.,- -:...........
Mnllery.... cIurtout.
o K_. _ _plying a pool or -. ...
_ 6oipoOo rar. few __then
~-bJd-...lte""""
oftIo. .......ped .....
o Do___...........
~..__or_
............. euch .. aodlum bromide.
_ CIHItIn"
IJ Nev. cIHn . ....... III. ...... or He,_
...... d-. _ -110....
dIIIIom....... eatth .... onto. em....
...........__Inlo_D_of
Iponl d_ _in'" gorIooge.
o 1f_luo_dll1-.caI
CupeItino~lor_ ...
-..1nO__..._1o
the un.., MWer.
Earth-Moving
Activities
Stonn Drain Pollution
from Eartft.Movlng ActIvItIes
501_'" gradirv ____
0III0lI1II of ... 11II "'"' flow or _ _ IIlonn
___~.__In_
'*' dog llIDnn -. _ ~ 11Io, ...
-.., _ In ..- ... the Blly. EIIec:IMl
__"'-_"'_of.-
..-v....--....---__...
roughened grotnI---
PracticetJ During Construction
a _ -..g vegoIldIon any when
-...,. _. PIonI '""-'"
........ for _ _ on ..... or
_............. not ~ plomod.
a"""",,,_.~_
........ .... _ _ .. -. or
1llln1p!*wy~ _lIoe _.... or
cIlcIIiielo _.......__
- to the RogIonoI _ au.a, ConInlI
_. _ IItId ~ Cor*'>I ReId
_...__..._~
_.
IJ C- ......... .... __ ... with
"""'"" terpo... pIaoIIc ~
The property owner and the contractor share ultimate responsibility for
the activities that occur on a construction site" You may be held responsible
for any environmental damage caused by your subcontractors or employees"
Il
--
0__-___
"",-..---..-..
.-pi ..caIIIc:IIId ft J*IIc _doh'"
cIIpOIId ala'"
o ~___..._
........Iran __,.............
---.-......
........ fl.................
--,....... --.............
-,
0_.......-.-._
---.-.....-
1IMaI............. eM_a....
...... Dr. __........-.
DIIMcI'>>lndoal:f)1llU" ...orveaun..
................fII..... ....,
=-~tI..._....
0____
ClOIIIIInICIId.......,. CMCDnIIin hIGh
-"'~_I__.....
__............_or
-..,....Im1_-__
-....-.....-"'.......
---"'--'
(SofV_"-"'._
-~
o .........JlIIInton..tIuIlIrv.<<l..
___lor__.....
-<>-*-........-.-
..--...----
to......,. _. ..,..........
.... far.................
-~-.,-
o _of_____
----.--
____..... (mil...........
--...........7300),
o Or_..........'(lJnooionoo...tI_
..,.......to beftlUMd. aID.....
--........---,)
o --_I.......73llD.._)
Roadwork
and
Paving
~
Storm DraIn PoIution
from RoadwDrtI:
_.....~oncI__
'-r1g1Iln..__....__
__._ror...._'*"'7,or
__10....,.....-._
-.-n......-Io_oncI.....'"
_poq.IJoncIlJIMI.....~'"
____oncIlIolllly.
Dwfng Canobl:fIon
o _......__-..._
_.or_....._Io_
-_.....~-
runolI.
0________
-lIPIIIl"V.... -. oU1y..... log.....
or__
[J -___br"*1l...._
_-...__Io_or_
---
0________
-,,-_or__rm
._or....._ ~_ reqdo. or
......Iodll_
a __..........llllpllolt._oIc.)oncI
----~-
_""'___nnalI_
........,._or~___
o _......_cwor.._or
__1__'*'-)10_
__"'In_
o CloM.. ......... -....."dt>f
-....---
"'IIIJ, otdlg~......... -1"1'POIIY......
of_a
o ~_"",,*ot~""'of
__~or_m
O__.....,....bJ__ror_
...-
Fresh Concrete
and Mortar -'
Application 6J
Slonn Drain Pollution from
Fresh Concrete and Mortar
Applications
Fresh CClI1CIlII8.... C8IIlfOlIkeIaI8_
that wash Inlo Iakea. -. or 8SlUarleI
8nllDldc III tIIIh and the aquaIlc
___ ClIpaoIngde-1Il8IBriIIII
10 the earn _ or ~ can block
Sbm~, ca_..... pmbIems, and
is prahIlIIed by law.
Gen.- ~ I'nH:IIces
a _....__onIyln~
__In_PIlI.__.......
-___.-..-wII-
rm.1eInparorJ _ pi In . dirt __ Let
_~.........otII_,",-oI
-,-_.~,
-...-......-bJ
pumplngbodt.....-ror_
a ..... out ebuIIs oM) dirt _Ihet do not
ao. to IIIreetI or chins.
0_____.,___
--,..-----
__---or___
-""'_.....-.
lJ _....of__...,....~
110...........,_____
---"'"*""--.
-.--
o Do ROt UN ..... fuel.. hDIcant on
c:cn::raIIt ranna, 1DaII, or.........
Dewatering
Operations
Heavy
E"q u i pm en t
~~peration
: Storm water Pollution
'from Heavy Equipment on
.' Construction Sites
pooic, maintained v.hlcle. and hoavy
:~~:.e~~ ~~'::~o~:~o~~:~=~~ or
colli'" on source. ohto,m drain p.'Jullon,
Pravent.pm. .nd look. by 1.0laUng
equipment from runoff ch.nn..., and by
watching for Jeaks and other maintenance
problems. Remove construction equipment
fro~, the site as soon as possible.
~~~
IJ DINoIap ond '"'*"*" _ - 1
_.....ror....,._
lJ __onI~_~
.,_.
a C-* rorond....-............
lJ _................_.
~_In,.._""'"
--..._,-portnq
...........--
lJ _-"or_~
__..donoon....dtoignoIe.
--.........---
a 1lo1lOt__oI.._OCIliIImn
~..- oqL/IllIIft
lJ """*-01,__....
.... -....-. ......"'pIq*Ir.
~1or1ol"'18C)dIng
~)
~""'-aI
lJ _......___~......
or_
a -~upold'___.....Io
-..--.....--
___-........In_
-noIf1IIIorlUllllll.
lJ _~___...._..
.-.-or-_ol.nJoncI
_........... ClMror..-....
---.~-.~oncI
~""""oI,"_
o ~____.._up
NlMdclrl. Ulea ...........<< 'CUm
Wdt.1lo nol*"'_IquorIn.....
-
Storm Drain Pollution
From Dewatering Actlvltle.
ConIImnated ~ II . common ,..oDI8m ~
..._c-._.~...otII_....
...~, -- -pod - -
.....", be ~ ... toxtce (such .. 01 or
_)or_____Asl'fol_
....- .... ..... _ In ....... or !he Boy, or
---_...plllnlopo-.
_..... __ ..... - a
......... _ _ _ ..... or lb. _
--"p-.
1. Cited' for Toxic Po"""""
o Ch.ek for odors. dSscok)ratfon, or an oily
sheen on groundwaler.
o Ask your building inlpedOf' whether the
groundwater musl be tnfed.
o tf co.tamlnatlon .. ."peeled. heve the
.__by._-,IoIy.
o "-_ on....... _ JOU m.,,,,
.aow.d 10 ~ pumped grounctwet... to
...._ _ (1100 __ prooonIj or
......., ....... OR. you may be requhd to
_.nd__OOdgrv__
for _onI.... """"1" an 0J>IlI09ri01f
_.nt-,.
2.. C"-*',.. ...... L.....
o If tile ...... .. clu,. the pumping time it ....
than 24 houra, and .. flow nile is leu than 20
11I'- por.._, -~....ppnwoJ
of the city 1nIpeGmr, you may be .1owecI1o
pump .... to..... IIrHt or ItDrm drain.
a If'" "III'" dIR. .. ..ore tit.. 24 lItoun
.... .... flow rMe ......r thD .zo Spm., C8'
Cupertino SantIery. 20.7071. for guidance.
(J If till......... 1IOt~. aoIIds ntUlt be
_ or _ out bJ _ping 10. .-.g
-_to-.,.o.
O_rar-....a_, SpIllCI.
- PumpInJ wIh 0 CleaR.p .,me J.....~. _ !')
~ from. backet pIaced';'~ cJ/ L 1.l,-A'.;Ql
.....Usln9.subm....pg\.::l'-' -u. . 117:;.'. -h.,.-::id.have
pIng~ ._ ~I r-,.(::).:r::n~".
....mlng pooI.......~ · diapoa. of absorb.
......... ... oI_n plpo,
"lal to a.... dra... protect 0 ....p up .pUIH dry mate,... Imm.dllltel
abwrterofbultlp bageftlad N.ver.tlem7~..Ih~~,..,.r- with ter.
rock,<<coverinletwilh....wmc _,__,.~urylh.m. - I {.......,,/(C
tmderthe~CO.."tIlSJil'lI&A...__..&... r H.I forduatoo trol.
....r..... ::::~a:r.*::.::_' ".ve sit or
C C~.~~~'~..brd.g~gu end
prap~ilf~~IftJn...d soli.
4 __.." ..r ........t ..Ilia
SUe Planning and Preventive Vehicle
M.'"tenanee
a O..lg.ata Dna .r.. of the construction .... weU
ilway from llream. or slonn drain Inlets. for aulo
and equipm.nt p.rting. refueUng. and routine
vahlcle and equipment malnten.nc.. Conllltn
the ar.. with barma. ..nd b.,., or other
barriers.
[J ..I...I..n ...all"'" and he.vy equlpm.nt.
Ina,ect frequanUr for and repa'" "ak..
a P~rfo.... major ..Int..anc., rep." jobs. and
.-1I1e.. and equipment w..hlng off...... where
.anup Ie .....r.
a rfyou mu.t drain .nd replace molor 01. rad.tor
cooa-At. or oth.r fluids on lb. u.. drip ,a.. or
drep cloUt. to cate.. drip. and .plh. Coleet
.1 epent fluid., "ora in a.p.ra.a conti""'''. and
property d.po.a .. hazardoul ..,te (recycle
whanever po...").
a Do not a.. die,.. 011 to lubricate equlpmant
parts, or clean equipment. UI. only ..ter for
any onaita c...ntng.
a Coyer a.poead fifth .....1 hitch.. and other
oily or gre.ay .qulpment during rain .v.nts.
o
Duttng
Clfy CtJlmcll
a Doa't_..
.... J'OU" UN
[l Sot up'"
'-~......
a _ -..... up
--
_..~
-,
lJ_
--
-...-
lJ _________
""_"'__(1)__.
cIrt_l2l__.___
_.......................-of
~.or(3)...__a_
-..-..g._--- .
_,--"'ton.-r_
____Illll_.........
...... --
lJ _ -... up __ ......... pick
up....pioooo.......... ol..-1y,
1leqo:Io...._oI__ Boo
--- -forlnfoan........
lJ ____ '*'-of....
......01_""'_ grout, lOld
_In""_
lJ _.....of_rmlhe_
llIDnn _. -....._. or......,
-..
Small Business
Hazardous Waste
9 isposaPPrgm
BusineSSes that generate less
than 2f gallons or 220 pounds
ot hazardous wast8tper month
are eligible to use thIs program.
Call 408-299-7300
for a quote"
.
~<::,~
--~
CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
CftIY or C1BlBR~O
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SHEET: C 5
.. """""Iil'
"""~,*1
~=~- -~=- - ---=- -= ~~ -=-= -::_-.c:::-= -=- -:= =- --==-==- =__~ =- ~ - -
MARIANI AVENUE .?
/N'__,,-~ _ ~ ~~.r\ rift ~ - - - ~- i)L -- -~ -. - -- - - -- ~> -
r~ " , ~ 1,,;--- :~ ~"~~~ _!!/ .:;,,'" ~ _________ ~ .~'~ "" ~
! ~ ,..:!?. t:::P-- J~ ~...Ja-. ~ l' Y J \~~ ~ .' '" : '. '::::::::::::~~~~ 1'~=~'
---\~{ ~ " -----1 -r ~ - ~--~ ~-- f'~m_-Tf-_m" · -- -- --~C%t~?
i ~~}I'.. I: _BAVlNSEESOPfLANTALLEDWEASTT L^J :11' J I I "~~:::--';'. '\>:/'/ .'::j ~:
\~ VI ~ h~~';~~~'~ ,f,
"'~ (=~T OO<~""-l~ He " I. He ,~~ (:~,f',;: , ,.....
~illi :r i I i:- .~ ' ~ e-' LL~ ..LJ I ~:' · ','<;)!\::;/
\ :~,'" -{ j2: - i I I HC ~$%W. .. U ~. ; '.:.:. :'.\;~:P~~:' :: :~.. \i\ 1\
(E) i ..... C - I I ~;/"~ ~j n i! PO . ;'. ;...... ..:",., ....'. .' :-1-:.:
EASEMENT \ "" t:.:: '- I HC / . ~1S . ;':.' ~,: .. -:1:-:-: ~M"\
ACCESS~ .-- ! / LIlT-- ,. .:-!-:-:-:IUJ
~:;r.r I : H L.r' "i.. (.',','V
\ 1 Ail\ .... ,I.'.:.:
. Ft : I ~ ~.. 1 Afi AiA'.- ., :::1;<::
~~.. .. i =G~f ~ I i .~ L. \l/ lJ i .. .): ~ Y I
--rf- 1 DECK ~ " L_ .....',..1.. 1M'
~- !~A80;-~~ f- I t~ '" - \. .-:<<C>~
m-r L_n \/ -""i- j'BLDG lJtI I II lJ C ... ~~.:.,::::::::: ~
SURfACE " '-'1"_ - V \ ACCESS I UP 1-_ " 'I'....
OR"NA" ~ " I!il\ _<;>..:t:- :- : ~,
~ ~ ~ \!I!/ -.: I ...1 !.~
- I TURN-. 1m. ~;t.. ",' 1-:':- / T'll'ICAl.
~ ',~ \ - / AROUND 1'1 1'1 '\.U I'l '~ \., :::::
,,---__...~~~ ~ r~~.r\~~~\ ~ ~~ r- ~ 2(!J \ '.','
(-:-, .' . . .e:J"'. . .,='.wmo. ~., ~_' .-. . .. '~~~;?Df
~ t-c. -~ _'^' -. I--- '. _.. ..r\ /tc,_ .. .." A,_ '''.r\. ~ _'. "'_ ,.. "" n' "" ,,' ,,., .. ..,.. '" "" ..' ,,., ,,. ,... ...''''" I ^ . I
\....-----.....J -- ~ ".... ...'- ""...----.-J ----/ ~.-./ - ~----' "" "" "" "" ."" "" ,,', ,'" I '\ :;J r;b
\,--.l-'""-,~~~ ,r'" ~ y"'--._._--J-.... /'-, L/ -__________'---+--1
I~ ~ 't---------- ~ ~ I )
~
<>
I
I
I
I
3' ~ i
~ I ci
I > I
I ill
I is'
I ~ I
i wi
01
1:1
~I
~I
4SA - ~O~ -010 '712-.;)
APPROVAl. U -di:ob -D~
...........
Plnn"IIf' CO"II"ssl~If 7 -/I-D
.....
c/o' COImcil to ~/5 -tD~
Plantin
\~
end
SYIot8OL
SIZE:
BOTANICAl. HAIlE
COUllENlS
SYllBa.
SIZE:
BOTANICAl. NAME
COllllON HAIlE
COIllIENlS
General Notes
TREES:
PERENNIAlS
"'"
CC
24- Box Arbutua 'Worina' - multi
24' Box Ceroio _..,010 'Fcreot pansi
15 Gal, Cord)l1no a"strollo 'Rod Star'
24' Box P)'Us <. 'OlCSltlcleer'
24- Box SequoJa.. -sJrnpaono. Slwr'
1II
LS
LP
lotS
OJ
1. "Green or Sustainable Landscape':
a. Landscape walls to be constructed of rsc)'Cled aggregate with 'Trex'
veneer to match the building,
b. Majority of the De Anza entry paving wm be impervious to allow rain water
to percolate bock into the groundwater table.
c. Landscape headerboord between paving and planting to be 'Trex' rec)/Cled
p'ostic and wood fiber or approved equal.
d. Reuse of the numerous existing landscape boulders on site.
e. All plants and p'anting areas ore to be amended and mulched with rec)'Cled
wood from BFl Organics (yard trimmings and wood waste) or approved equal.
f. 90lt of the selected plants ore classified as "ow water usage' by the State of
California, Deportment of Water Resources (WlJCOlS).
g. All trees and shrubs will be watered by a low volume or drip irrigation system.
1 Gal.
, Gal.
1 Got
1 Gal.
Lantono m. "purpJe'
laYendu&a atoechal
Trolln<j Lantana
SponIIh !.awn"'"
s.o Lawn"'"
llolden Groa
G10nt Llriopo
F"ountaln Gross
Hybrid lAodrono
EooIom Redbud
Umontum perezli
U~~u.8m~ 'Z~~
CA
No Common Name
OiClltideer Ornamental Pear
PC
S Gal
1 Gal.
5 Gal.
5 Gal.
S Gal.
5 Gal.
ss
Coool Redwood
OphlopOllon joburan
SHRUBS
PE
PH
PH
PH J
Pennisstum
Phormlum 'Duet'
Phormlum 'Bronze Baby'
Phormlum 'Dusky Oller
Phormlum 'Plott'. Block'
Hjbrid Flax
H~ Flax
Hjbrid F1o.
H~F1ox
MeXIcon Sage
AS
5 Got Abutllon 'Moonbeam'
flowering llopl.
Ctll
PH 4
5 Got. cnvlo mi'liota 'Sdomon. H)tJrid'
Yellow KDffir Uy
51.
SalvIa leucontha
1 Gal.
OA
5 Got. 0_10 CSltorllco
TaamCl'dan lree F.-n
LC
5 Gal
Loropotolum chIn_ 'Plum'
1I)f1co collfomlco
NCSldtno d. 'Gulf Stream'
Frlngo F1""",
Pacific wax 11l81J.
Gulf Stream Heaventy Bamboo
GROUNOCO~
IIC
NO
5 Gal.
5 Gal.
1 Gal.
1 Gal,
1 Gal.
1 Gal.
1 Gal
Comlo p, 'Dusky Sells'
GrwYlfeo 'Low Form'
Hellctotnchon
Rccnar1nu8 0. 'Huntington Carpet'
Scoveola '''au", Oust....
.\uSttOIkJn Fuchsia
_y Gr.-.m..
B1"" Oat Gr_
R-'1O/Y
Fan now...
PlttllOpONm toblro ~a
RophIoIepls "_ato 'Ulnar'
Rosmorinua 0. "TU8CC:WI Blue'
Tueean Slue Rosemary
4' D,c.. spacing
;r 0.<' Ipocln<j
18" o,c, spoclng
7: 0.0. opaclnll
7: 0.<' spocklg
c:::>
2. Provide a minimum 3" layer of recycled wood mu'ch within existing tree driplines.
The area 5' from each tree trunk is not to be planted, watered, nor is any
trenching allowed.
PT
5GoL
Vor;egotod Toblra
RII
RT
SR
lMl
5GoL
5 Gal.
5 GoI.
5 Gal.
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Scale: 1" = 20' - 0"
Dworf Yeddo Hawthorn
Sarcococ:cc ru8tlfolfD
Fragrant Sarcococco
Cooot Rosemary
Weotringlo lnotlcosum
Sod
'uocloll1on' by Pacific Sod
Toll feacue
5
-
~-
lMm
Greg G. Ing
& Associates
LandJcape~
1585 The AJ.med4 Sum! 201
Son~ CJJiEomIo 95126
......-'1110. Stlra.a.".,
Rev, Descri .
ARal. BlOC. RE\IIEW
IlESlGN SUIlIllrTAL
OESICH RE\IISIONS
PIlE BASE
ny Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drawing Tttte
Conceptual
Landscape Plan
Job #
Date:
Scale:
Dl1lwn By:
Sheet
A40165
3 29/06
AS NOlED
CL1
EXHIBITS
BEGIN
HERE
~ ANDREW Q. WU Ph.D., L.A,
Certified Acupuncturist
- Prof. ofTion Jin T.CM. Colle ,.t.'1f.ffia~~
. Ph.D. of American Global Uni~ity, v:.~:(
- President of AWTM '1;' , ;:..""
~ C. 10 117 /o~
~l~
[=-T-~l
LicenseNo.:Ac 3712
Dr. Andrew Wu L.Ac
Mariani Business Center
20600 Mariani Ave
Cupertino, CA 95014
f5) (E ~ (E ~ \VI ~ rR\
ml OCT 1 7 2006 lW
October 17,2006
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
Dear City Council Members! City Clerk,
With regards to the City Council Appeal Hearing scheduled for October 17, 2006
concerning the redevelopment of 10495 N. De Anza Blvd (the former Any Mountain
Building), I would like to request for the postponement of the hearing until the next City
Council hearing. If! am correct, I believe it is scheduled for November 7th.
My husband, Dr. Andrew Wu, is currently in China serving as vice-chairman for a
medical conference. I paid for this reconsideration hearing and filed the appeal in a
timely manner. This hearing is very important to him. He should be present and able to
voice his concerns over the project.
I am deeply sorry for the late notification, but the City Council approved an
appeal regarding the redevelopment of 10495 N. De Anza Blvd (the former Any
Mountain Building). Dr. Andrew Wu should be present to ensure the appeal hearing is
fair all parties and everyone has a chance to address the council.
Sincerely,
~"~ (: 00,
J~e Wu "
Voter and Taxpayer
20600 Mariani Ave. . Cupertino, CA 95014 . Tel: (408) 257-3767 . Fax: (408) 257-3825
DRAFT cc ID II7/u
RESOLUTION NO. O~' ""', '7.1 ~ tor, ~
"'~ tJ ~ W LJ
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING THE
PETITION OF JANE WU SEEKING COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION OF ITS APPROVAL
OF APPLICATION NO. U-2006-06, A USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE, TO BE LOCATED AT 10495 N. DE ANZA
BL VD. IN CUPERTINO, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, AND EA-2006-09, A MITIGATED
NEGA TIVE DECLARATION.
Whereas, Application No. U-2006-06, a use permit for the construction of an office building
and parking garage, to be located at 10495 N. De Anza Blvd. in Cupertino, ASA-2006-06, TR-
2006-09, and EA-2006-09, a mitigated negative declaration, was approved by the City Council
with conditions on August 15, 2006; and
Whereas, Jane Wu has requested that the City Council reconsider its decision under the
provisions of section 2.08.096 of the City's ordinance code; and
Whereas, the City Council has considered all relevant evidence presented by the parties
at all hearings, including evidence presented at the October 17, 2006 reconsideration
hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
I. The petitioner's Reconsideration Petition is defective on its face in that it does not offer
proof of facts as required by Municipal Code section 2.08.096.
2. The petitioner has made no offer of new relevant evidence that, in the exercise of
reasonable diligence, could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing. (See Municipal
Code ~ 2.08.096B(1).)
3. The City Council did not exclude any evidence presented by the petitioners at any prior
city hearing. (See Municipal Code S 2.08.0968(2).)
4. The City Council has proceeded entirely within its jurisdiction regarding the application
for a use permit. (See Municipal Code S 2.08.0968(3).)
5. The petitioner has failed to present any evidence that the City Council failed to provide a
fair hearing. (See Municipal Code S 2.08.096B(4).)
6. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the City Council abused its discretion
regarding the application. (See Municipal Code S 2.08.096B(5).) Specifically, the City Council
determines that:
a. The City Council proceeded in a manner required by law.
b. The City Council's decision is supported by findings of fact.
c. The findings of fact related to the City Council's decision were supported by
substantial evidence in the record of proceedings.
Resolution No. 06-175
2
7. The specific allegations contained in the petition for reconsideration are refuted by
specific City Council findings, which are attached to this resolution and incorporated herein.
8. The petitioner's Petition for Reconsideration of the City Council's determination of
August 15, 2006 is DENIED
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 17th day of October 2006, by the following vote:
V ote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
Resolution No. 06-175
3
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS IN RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section 19.124.070 a conditional use permit may be
granted where the decision maker makes the following findings:
I) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience; .
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title.
In granting the use permit application U-2006-06 (Chang Architecture, former Any
Mountain building), the City Council finds: a. that the use was in accord with the Cupertino
General Plan Land Use Map; and, b. that the use of the subject property will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience.
Municipal Code section 2.08.096 states:
"A petition for reconsideration shall specify, in detail, each and every ground for
reconsideration. Failure of a petition to specify any particular ground or grounds for
consideration, precludes that particular omitted ground or grounds from being raised or litigated
in a subsequent judicial proceeding.
The grounds for reconsideration are limited to the following:
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence,
could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing.
2. An offer of relevant evidence which was improperly excluded at any prior city
hearing.
3. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council proceeded without, or in
excess of its jurisdiction.
4. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair hearing.
5. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City the City Council abused its discretion
by:
a. Not proceeding in a manner required by law; and/or
b. Rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact; and/or
c. Rendering a decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the
evidence. "
A petition for reconsideration of Application No. U-2006-06, a use permit for the construction of
an office building and parking garage, to be located at 10495 N. De Anza Blvd. in Cupertino,
ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09, and EA-2006-09, a mitigated negative declaration, was submitted
by Jane Wu on August 25, 2006.
Resolution No. 06-175
4
FINDINGS
Ms. Wu's Petition for Reconsideration make the following assertions:
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which in the exercise of reasonable diligence could not
have been produced at any earlier city hearing:
WU PETITION FINDING
"After the proposed building was passed, it The comment by the two council members
was brought up by Commissioners K wok is irrelevant. Since the vote was already
and Wang that Peter Pau should continue taken, this did not constitute a directive
negotiations with the Mariani Business from the City Council and was not a part of
Center. " the Council resolution. It was given in the
spirit of encouraging good neighborliness.
Response: The irrelevant comment by the two council members is not new relevant evidence.
2. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair hearing.
WU PETITION FINDING
".. .our representative, Sam Wu, was not To provide fair and equitable hearing, all
able to present his entire conversation members of the public are allotted the same
before the City Council dismissed him. amount of time to address the Council. In
There were many key points in his addition to Mr. Wu, the Council also heard
presentation that he was unable to present from Judith Rentschler, attorney for the
to the City Council." Mariani Business Center. Additionally, the
Council received and considered Mr. Wu's
letter of August 15, 2006, which outlined
his key points and Ms. Rentschler's letter
of August 14,2006.
Mayor Lowenthal "stated that 'it was not a This is an incorrect paraphrase of Mr.
parking issue,' and therefore, the easement Lowenthal's statement. In fact, after Mr.
would not have to be obeyed. ... If this Wu's presentation Mr. Lowenthal asked if
building were to be built according to plan, his two issues were 1) inequity of use of
it would definitely affect our parking rights the driveway and 20 safety of the clients.
by affecting how our patients would access Mr. Wu added his concern that the building
the building and, ultimately, determining would block the view. After public input,
where they would park." Mr. Lowenthal stated," I didn't hear any
issue on parking itself. I think there are
design issues."
Response: The hearing was fair and the Council received and considered Mr. Wu's evidence.
Resolution No. 06-175
5
CONCLUSION
The petition for reconsideration did not comply with Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 in that the
petition did not meet the requirements by offering any of the following:
1. An offer of new relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence,
could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing.
2. An offer of relevant evidence which was improperly excluded at any prior city
hearing.
3. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council proceeded without, or in
excess of its jurisdiction.
4. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council failed to provide a fair hearing.
5. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City the City Council abused its discretion
by:
a. Not proceeding in a manner required by law; and/or
b. Rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact; and/or
c. Rendering a decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the
evidence. "
In addition the Council finds that with the conditions imposed by the Council:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or lllJunous to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title.
In reviewing the Petition filed by Jane Wu to Reconsider the Council's decision to grant the
applications as noted in detail above, the City Council finds that there is no relevant evidence or
proof of facts that support any of the grounds for reconsideration as required by Cupertino
Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 B. 1-5.