SCTF 05-21-02 APPROVED MINUTES
City of Cupertino
STEVENS CREEK TRAIL TASK FORCE
Regular Meeting of Tuesday, May 21, 2002
ATTENDANCE:
Task Force Members Present
Jeanne Bradford, Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission (late arrival)
Susie Brain, Friends of Stevens Creek Trail
Craig Breon, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society
John Buenz, Meadows Homeowners Association
Dave Constant, Linda Vista Park Neighborhood
David Greenstein, Cupertino Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Mary Jo Gunderson, Linda Vista Neighborhood
Scott Hathaway, Deep Cliff Golf Course
Task Force Members Absent
Ann Cleaver, Meadows Homeowners Association
John Giovanola, Hanson Permanente Cement
Steve Haze, Cupertino Historical Society
Beez Jones, Stevens Creek Canyon Homeowners
John Kolski, Stevens Creek Quarry
Richard Lowenthal, Cupertino City Council
Chuck Noble, Scenic Circle Neighborhood
Staff Present
Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director, Parks and Recreation Department
Marie Preston, Administrative Secretary
Consultant
Jana Sokale, Environmental Planner
I. Approval of Minutes
Minutes of January 22, 2002 were not approved due to lack of a quorum.
II. Communications - None
III. New Business
IV. Distribution and Overview of Draft Trail Feasibility Report
Jana gave an update on events since the Task Force last met:
City of Cupertino
Stevens Creek Trail Task
Minutes of May 21, 2002
Force
Page 2
At the March City Council study session, Ms. Sokale presented the overall
trail plan. City Council indicated some of the sentiments of the Task Force
with respect to Study Area D and the Blackberry Farm alignment. They
were not "too keen" on the depressed pathway option described in the
report.
Jana recommended to staff to not pursue the environmental analysis of
Study Areas C and D at this time, and not spend the money evaluating a
design that was likely to change through the Blackberry Farm Master
Plan. She also suggested that we wait for the Blackberry Farm Master Plan
process to take place, then wrap-up the environmental review, and spend
the money and do the review as one whole piece. Jana will proceed with a
revised scope for Study Area A, which is underway. Environmental
review for Study Area B had always been attached to the proposed
Canyon Heights Academy project. This EIR will include the trail through
the canyon and the quarry area.
The feasibility report stands as it was on January 22, 2002. The report and
associated recommendations will be presented to the Park and Recreation
Commission and City Council. The Task Force recommendations will also
inform the master plan process. She noted that by not proceeding with the
environmental review of Study Areas C and D, Cupertino could not build
these sections of trail until the environmental review is completed in the
future.
Therese Smith reported that the City Council was happy with the Task
Force's work, with the exception of the depressed pathway in Study Area D.
She also reported on the progress of the Blackberry Farm Master Plan
. process:
· On February 21, Mike O'Dowd presented the first public input session to
the Parks and Recreation Commission. This meeting was webcasted and is
available online in the city's archives.
· The park is 50 years old and not a lot of money has been invested by the
city over the years.
· Parks and Recreation is looking for ideas for what to do with the
properties (McClellan Ranch, Blackberry Farm and golf course, Stocklmier
and Simms properties)
· The idea of using the creek as the organizing theme may be used.
City of Cupertino
Stevens Creek Trail Task Force
Minutes of May 21, 2002
Page 3
To obtain a broader vision for the Blackberry Farm master plan, the Public
Dialogue Consortium (PDC) will hold a meeting to work with focus
groups that will be developed from interested neighbors of the park. From
this meeting, questions will be developed by Godbe Research for a
Cupertino-wide telephone survey asking people how they would like to
see this park space developed.
Jana Sokale briefly discussed the development of the draft feasibility report
and the steps and recommendations that were made by the Task Force over
the past few months.
Therese Smith reported that since the draft feasibility report was just received
and that none of the Task Force members have had a chance to review it, as
well as the community, another meeting of the Task Force would need to be
scheduled.
V. Public Comments
Deborah Iamison, 21346 Rumford Drive, asked, with her strong interest in
McClellan Ranch, what should she do to participate in the focus group
process.
Therese responded by asking her to respond to the letter sent out and to sign up for
the McClellan Ranch focus group. Therese also reported that the focus group is not
the only way to participate in the Blackberry Farm master plan process; there will be
public meetings and a community-wide survey that will allow people to get involved.
The public was asked to sign up that evening if there were interested in participating
in a focus group.
Discussion
Jana explained that the report implements recommendations from the Task
Force, as well as part of the vision set forth in the Cupertino General Plan
preserving this corridor. She briefly outlined the four study areas. The first
100 pages document the work of the Task Force over the past 14 months and
it details the criteria that were used to select alignments. The back half of the
report includes the six subconsultant reports that have been reviewed by the
Task Force, with the exception of Dr. Lyrme Trulio's Habitat Enhancement
Report, which is still yet to be completed. This report will be out in the next
draft. There are 12 site maps in the document, as well as a full-sized map of
City of Cupertino
Stevens Creek Trail Task
Minutes of May 21, 2002
Force
Page
the entire project located in the back pocket of the report. She reported that
the Task Force recommended about seven miles of trail.
Jana Sokale reported that a copy of the draft feasibility report would be at the
library, city hall, and on the city's website. She encouraged the community to
review this report and to send in their comments.
Dave Greenstein reported that this was the first time the Task Force had seen
the report, but asked for questions.
Therese Smith recommended that the Task Force members consider
reconvening to another date to review the report.
John Buenz requested that the Task Force reconvene in order to be able to
give an informed response to the feasibility report and that a message be sent
to each of the Task Force members informing them of the importance of their
participation in the next meeting. The Task Force agreed with the
recommendation. A meeting will be scheduled for June 18, 2002. Task Force
members will be asked to forward their comments for inclusion in this
meeting by Friday, June 7.
Public Comments:
loan Meehan, 21082 Northcove Square, congratulated the Task Force on their
hard work. She is an equestrian and wants to be involved as a volunteer in
trail/equestrian issues.
Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Ave., acknowledged that the Task Force has
sometimes worked under heavy criticism from the community. He does not
support a ten-foot-wide trail through McClellan Ranch.
May Koski, 22030 Regnart Rd., congratulated the Task Force's on their hard
work. She is looking forward to the Stevens Creek Trail. She believes that
Cupertino has wonderful resources that should be shared with more of the
community. She also believes that the Linda Vista neighbors should not hold
on to their fears about strangers coming into their neighborhood. She lives
near a trail and has come to discover that her initial fears are unfounded as
many neighbors and not strangers use the trail next to her home. She is glad
the Task Force recommended a multi-use trail.
City of Cupertino
Stevens Creek Trail Task Force
Minutes of May 21, 2002
Page 5
Gerald Gras, 655 S. Fair Oaks #H211, Sunnyvale, is a supporter and users of
trails in general. He believes the trail is a good addition to the city. He would
like to see the City of Sunnyvale construct the Stevens Creek Trail in their city
and have it connect to the City of Cupertino.
Deborah lamison, 21346 Rumford Dr., spoke in defense of the McClellan
Ranch, and supports the Stevens Creek Trail. She does not support a paved
roadbed through McClellan Ranch. She believes it is a clear violation of the
McClellan Ranch Master Plan and the founding ordinance and the principles
and values expressed in the regulations and guidelines. She would support a
more tranquil, soft-surfaced trail that could be used by mountain bikers,
tricyclists, and other multi-uses. She has noticed that the issue of dogs on the
trail has not been addressed at all.
Alex Tsai, 21975 San Fernando Ave., is not opposed to the trail, but he is
strongly against the current alignment within Blackberry Farm. Major issues
he has are the need to separate the paid area from the trail, the depressed
pathway near his home, the trail cutting through the existing lawn area that
most visitors now enjoy. He does not like the alignment at all through
Blackberry Farm. He urges the City Council and staff members reconsider
this trail design with the Blackberry Farm Master Plan.
Rod Brown reported on the Community Congress that had two relevant
sessions, one on open space and parks, another on
walkability/bikeability/trails. He asked if the data from the meeting had
been put together? He believes this information would be of value to the
Task Force.
Mike Vroman, 10681 Johnson Ave., reported that he also attended the
Community Congress and wanted to know the same thing. He thanked the
members of the Task Force for their recommendations and hard work. He is
happy with the recommendation of a hard surfaced trail that will make is
more accessible to more people.
Task Force Comments
Craig Breon asked that at the next meeting the Task Force address the issue of
dog access on the trail. He asked that Jana Sokale provide examples on both
sides of the issue. He stated that the McClellan Ranch Task Force did not
think about this issue when they first looked at the trail. There are 4-H
City of Cupertino
Stevens Creek Trail Task Force
Minutes of May 21, 2002
Page 6
animals at McClellan and the animals, as well as their owners, may not
handle dogs on or off leash coming by their pens.
Regarding getting the data from the Community Congress, Therese Smith
reported that the information would be available in draft form in about two
weeks. The Community Congress was well attended. Copies will be made
available.
Jana Sokale confirmed that dog access is not covered in the feasibility report.
VI. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned to Tuesday, June 18, 2002.
Respectfully submitted,
Marie Preston, Administrative Secretary