R-2004-15b
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
CITY OF Telephone: (408) 777-3308
CUPEI11TIN.', ..0' FAX: (408) 777-3333
..... . . . .lI''\! I . . .' .__,_,_._.''"'._..____..___.__.,......_...................,."....,..._...__............_...._._....._"._...........................-.......-.-......-...-.............-.-..,.......---...--......-.......,..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
July 22,2004
Holly Hartman
Hornetec
1540-A Parkmoor Avenue
San Jose, CA 95128
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION LETTER - Application R-2004-15
This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting
of July 21,2004; approving an exception for a second story addition to exceed 35% of the
first floor, located at 10110 Lockwood Drive, according to Resolution No. 162.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within one year, it shall expire on
July 21, 2005.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days
from the date of this letter. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing,
which will be scheduled before the City CounciL
Sincerely,
Chao
Assistant Planner
Enclosures:
Resolution No. 162
Cc: Vaishali Hadap, 10110 Lockwood Drive, Cupertino, CA 95014
g:planning/D RC Connnitteejaction letter R-2004..15
R -2004-15
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 162
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING
A EXCEPTION FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO EXCEED 35% OF THE FIRST
FLOOR.
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: R-2004-15
Applicant/Owner: Holly Hartman/Hadap
Location: 10110 Lockwood Drive
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a R1 Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area and the following exception findings can be met;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent o.f this title in that the proposed project is
consistent with the intent of the ordinance and will not impact the neighborhood
since it improves the design and articulation of the currently two-story house.
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the
proposed project is an allowed use and is compatible with the surrounding
neighborhoods in terms of setbacks, height, mass, style, and design.
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose in that the project property allows a 4,975 square foot homes. The
applicant chooses not to maximize the allowable F .A.R and requests a slightly
larger second floor instead. The proposed second floor meets all of the
articulation and setback rules and its design is consistent with the intent of the
ordinance. The exception of a 38 % second floor to first floor ratio requires the
least modifications to the prescribed regulations in order to accomplish the
expansion.
Resolution No. 162
Page 2
R-2004-15
July 21,2004
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
4. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed
from abutting properties in that the proposed house design is compatible with
the surrounding houses and the second floor does not appear overly massive and
out of scale addressing the intent of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. R-2004-15, is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
R-2004-15 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of July
21,2004, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: /I Addition and remodel for Vasudeo &
Vaishali Hadap, 10110 Lockwood Drive, Cupertino, Ca./I consisting of five sheets
labeled: Al - A5, and dated 6/16/04, except as may be amended by conditions
contained in this resolution.
2. PRIV ACY PROTECTION PLANTING
The applicant shall submit a final privacy protection plan indicating the planting of
City approved trees to screen all new second story windows in accordance with the
City's R1 Ordinance unless if a waiver is obtained from the affected property
owners. The final privacy protection plan shall be submitted for review and
approval prior to issuance of the final occupancy.
3. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT
The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future
property owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection
requirements. The precise language will be subject to approval of Planning staff.
Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development
Department prior to final occupancy of the residence.
Resolution No. 162
Page 3
R-2004-15
July 21, 2004
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
4. SITE PLAN
A final detailed site plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review
and approval indicating accurate building setback lines (ground floor & second
floor) prior to issuance of the building permits. In addition, the street side yard
setback along Stevens Creek Blvd. shall be increased to 12 feet (measured from the
property line).
5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of
a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications,
reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day
approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and
other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you
fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements
of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Chen and Chairperson Wong
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Miller
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
f sf Ciddy Wordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
f sf Gilbert Wong
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
G: \ Planlling\ DRC\ res \ R-2004-J5 res.doc
-""'~'iWiI<l<l!:Xl\lXlO10!Wl
dVaVH liWH'<lIVA'P 03anS"A
~~ <(
h ~
~ ~ ~ l!:!
~ 2 8~ ii'i
~ ~~I
H ~~
d ~~
C\
H
~
'./-
\f,
.~
~
~.
:z
::'5
l>..
~
m
"~..1I'"..1C.J ."~\"1;t~~"il-::~ Sy'I,'~j\~i;!'j.s:31"
~
;5
JVQVH 11VH91VA 'l? 03,clflGVA
;z
a
~
w
,d
w
t;)
~
;z
~
~
W
....I
W
~
a
;z
z
a
i=
~
W
....I
W
~
;z
a
i=
~
....I
W
i!:
::l
o
<.l)
"!<:)l;G v:J"OIlu:<,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~'ll)\lCl
~~.l]thI~
;z
<
d
!>-
~
o
:3
u.
~-
\f)
~
Ii:
\.!)
::z
i=
\f)
t;j
;z
:5
!>-
8
....I
U.
CI
;z
8
w
<.l)
\.!)
;z
i=
\f)
(;j
i~~
tIO<l!!l. "" 'QNll:<3lJI1i:;J'''~ 00<:W::t?<rl """I
, , I~
,
,
,;~
i
dVQYIH IWH9IVA'li' 03QI19VA
'lIOJ ~""'''a'''' N:JllJO(lV (
.
II '~Ii~~
.. u~ll~ (
i': "H r ;:'~'I\11
"
",c.
""
u
./
",,51 J i~,
...... ,_"I J~
i li:i~dii II,.. ~~.. ...
J~
.t:r',
, ,
,
<1;; ;.
;I
!
)
~ll~ '>
/,.~1. "=;:>
)
li"'.::....o
,-
,
f;~1
~.~ I>'"
~~. It':"i'
7~'
~r 1,\ lei .
; li:: ~ :
'; ,'I ,..' I '
{~Ii:~_' ~ qi ·
r~'~.. :~J..l Ii 0"
,. .,~ ..J .. .....J
... ... "
n< Wi}
,~r I // I~ r~r:l// h~
.. ...~.... ~ ~ ~ ~. i>; ~.S ~
~~~~!I -:+
I j . ..'::ii..........:: /" l.:"
. "'.
, : r~, ' ""
I, . .
, I:
l
1 ~:
,
,
,~~:
i
: j.
: ,.._~~~- mi
tl ~
~~.
~;
~
,'.'''' ,
...
'i':
, ,
.,
l
I
I
~
?d ~
~"
""tl
I:
z
<
...J
tl..
Ilt..
8
-l
u..
Ir-
&1
G:
~..,.,..,....., ,
:
,
'~
",'
/'1;;0,
\.1?
I
,
'I. ,"
l "';;;;
t:t~' .... ",," ....1
.......... .....
j
~................""'.ii,.
:',
l
( ,
, ,
: II
:
l
~
~
n";;;~}'1
,-
,'"
.,
h"
."..
'1 II
jl I !. t~qlllL P
I,m d I ! \I ~ ~~ll ! Ii! Ii ~l. ~
!~' ~'.;I.:.
"HJ ~.~~.
" - .~.
'. 'N'~' ,_"'.
:
I
!=,
I /':1
.. <0"
."
L
: I.
,
,
,
~
,..1........... i U:\ ........
!i1~ :;
:' .,,'" "', _ ~ ~~ ... ........... HI;
" h .' Fe", ...... ~ ~~
: i: ~' ~ ~'r , .' ,[,~:~, ~:'" .....i
1i ' :,,;, " ." i, .jif!j~.7'O"".~I."1 '
./ :~~;;I~~ .~; . i " , '
';'~Ij(:';~:;I~~'~~'~' , "
,/'1\,;) 11,;)1 ,., :1 ~ ~\,.
'" .
, ,
z
:s
ll....
Ilt.
o
o
_..J.
II.
Q
Z
o
~
\l)
z
<
.....
ll....
Ilt.
g II
Il..
l-
Z
IJj
:::i:
IJj
~
10 l '
l l
}.~
"'~
~:~
I' \
~ r"': I J;lI~~~:h!
. l
-,
,
tJ
'I, '
I:
,
, ,
!
..
I
I 'I
)'
~"
~ -- """"" , ~ Vj'ON~'3JI'lCl'+~dl:X.Wl'tX11 Cffi~ ~ $ ~ ,. ~
~ '.!V :..JNj, :,mnJ:):UJII.:J~V dVaVH I1VH~IV^ 'li' 03(Jn~v A '; ~
. I<'t:: "
, ',.,.J l~ mN li(lijJOO\l nI
""m~L~~~.
z
o
1=
~
...J
.W
l-
I!)
~
z
o
~
W
d
Ul
,.",
I!)
<(
ill
z
o
~
::>-
w
-'
w
IE
I:it.
o
Z
i
~,
;
"""""V)"OIlUll<l.ll1::l~<lIXl'\-n::vl""'"
dvaYH 11\IH6IVA'Ii' 03an9VA
"""'''''''''''''" ON'! NOll.lO<lY
z
o
~
ti'i
~~
w
~
::l
o
ill
z
o
6
w
m
z
o
5
w
ill
�1���'�
A � 2004T SEP 2 4
POSTED ON G 2 � HRQUGId �oo� Ci of Cu ertino
IN TIi� OFl�lCi UF T€-IC CL�L`i�i"?"1� (::�iiZK ttF�CORDER � p
B�F��� ll��v s, Co�JN .;' C��;:.:; 10300 Torre Avenue
BY ~� � DEPUTY Cupertino, CA 95014
1,,�`.'t: RA B. A!`t.!"�. � �R
Notice of Exemption
To: County Clerk-Recorder
70 W. Hedding Street, 1 Floor AUG 2 5 2004
East Wing—Business Division BRENDA DAVIS, County Cierk-Recorder
San Jose, CA 95110 Santa Clara Courrty
By Deputy
Project Title: R-2004-15
Project Location -(be specific): 10110 Lockwood Drive
Project Location -(City):Cupertino Project Location -(County): Santa Clara
Description of Project: Residential Desi�n IZeview for an exception for a second-storv addition
to exceed 35% of the first storv.
Name of Public Agency approving project: Cit�of Cupertino
Name of Person or Agency carrying out prc�ject: Hollv Hartman (Hadap residence)
Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 152E 8);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
x Categorical Exemption. State type ;ind section number: 15303(a)
_Statutory Exemption. State code nwnber:
Reasons why project is exempt: Additioli to an existin� single-family home
Lead Agency
Contact Person: G Chao � Area code/telephone number�408� 777-3247
_.._- _. -
Signature. ;�' ])ate: Julv 26, 2004 Title: AssocitaePlanner
;
g/planning/erc/r2004] 5