Loading...
020501870 a as F- ad - .; ,... .. _ ...... . _,_ OFFICE CITY OF�CUPERTINO CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: BUILDING DIVISION PERMIT t BUILDINGADDRESS:, PERMIT NO. 10335-FARALLONE DR 02050187 OWNER'S NAME: APPLICATION SUB DATE BRUMM CHARLES F AND CLARE T 05/30/2002 PHONE: SANITARY NO. CONTROL NO. ARCHITEC (ENGINEER: u O BUILDING PERMIT INFO m BLDG ELECT PLUMB MECH y LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION Job Description 1 hereby aFw that 1 am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing nF-m with S 4UW)orDivision3oftheBusy ndProfessionsCodeand mylicenu <<a�<<e�Y nraff REROOF zea Liccn Lic.p /�Z�OO 11 T/0 SHAKES, INSTALL 1/2 OSB PLY BOARD Q iu. Our ueSa� Da - ARCHITECT'S.. RATION 30 LB FELT MONIER VILLA LIGHT WEIGHT TILE �N I understand my plans shall W used as pts lic records Licensed Professional 5 p O z a OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION +� ? a 1 hereby affirm rent 1 1. aurin from the Cessions Co License Law nor the following massa (Section . Business antl Professions Code: Any city E F o exonsstcounty' which requires a permit w coisswcl. ahec impmve, ecmolixh, or repair any swcmrt i 3 m -,lin rto its i+s soca alts requires rispplicant for such Permit to file asigned statement Sq. LiFlOO uationCO 'bathe yfcensed purstrant lopte provisions of the Contractors License La(Chapter9 (ocr ealBlbugsdjdnfeAnsiyosysioClinododn i3ngexweim!hpSi <Neircnfm]Wm Oa)n etirIM1Ueivbassoisn mamt c fJoroNft<h d e;kemnpduPoho 00 ; $13jn of Section 9031.5 by any applicani, fora pencil subjects the applicant too civil penalty of not mom than five hundred danars(s5W). AApp��..77 ��rr 3693101rh ...., - Occupancy Type ❑ 1, as owner of the propcny, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation. wares the work. -and the suaash: n is not cremes er offered does eme(spl to so is Law does not apply w en Bulinus and'Prly Code: The Cves and - 3 0 5 — FRAME Required Inspections t' ` ` owner of progeny Who builds or improves the Who w , and who docs such wank himself or through his own a ove,e et. provided that at such are not intended or 0 7- - mgr vemenvememe ';dRcrfd for sale If; however, -the building or improvement is sold within"one Year of completion. the owner -builder will have Ne burden of proving that he did not build or "_. ___ _.3 .. __INSULATION 601 — ROOF TEAR OFF improve for intrinsic ofsale.). 602 — ROOF PLYWOOD NAIL --❑ I s nenImjes progeny am sinus ly contI t g with licenud contractors m 603 ROOF BATTENS - ca newer w project (See ]6u w,am ss and en, Professions Code) The ve then or's Licensestud«a notr.sucman ownerth pmpenywhoblew: Improves Nemm�, 604 — ROOF IN -PROGRESS'" ' s .and who cs ch Protects wMacommnoa(s)Imcnud.pursuant. to. me .. .._.. -_.._—__...-___.......,.._..._...._. __. ,. ..-..._._._. _....... .._ _. _ ._,.. __.... .._...._.._.. Contractor LicenseLoss. License Law. ... ❑ l um exanpt under Sec;' - ; B'& P C for his reason 1:' i f '.. i - `I;. ;. Owner'•. .. " - " Date . WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION ' I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: ❑ 1 have and will'meintain is Cenffiew,'of Consent to ulf-insure for Worker's Compensation.- as provided for by Section 37W of the -Labor Code, for the ��l�® a ,Y � � ® piumm ma. of the work for which this permit is issued Cl I have and will maintain Workar"s Compensation Insurance, as required by section 37W fah Lahr Code far th perform a of the work f which Nis pc 'I s is d My W k Is C 's I JUL 1 7 2002 I ts m r and Policy be q Cart ) p' " /rr/S GUR/O Pol ' N CERTIFl ATION OFEXEMITON FROM WORKERS. :� �, - .• COMPENSATION INSURANCE ' f i N l R -""t IIA ,.\ I I St• 1 r \ tt� BUFLD91yG v1:11Tnis union need'nor he'complcted if the Permit is for one hundred dollars " t " IEI W)or less.) " - 1 n fY.lhat Ih p r( a of the work for wh ch ih perm is sued'I off 6, employ any person in any manner eo ae tn'bewme sublect Io the Workers al - '- - _ "' " . 1; e. ''�. Cmin p weli.n Lows of Califrmis Did -Apphaeart , :.. , c. .. ETOAPo er this Certificate of of on. should dyou the WorlmesC Compensation Labor the Labor Codayou most Compensation permit Innhwitli foromhirc ec,wit O nichIs hall comply with.eudh Drovisisns or this permit shall be domed uwkW. :� " '• CONSTRUCPIONLENDINO AGENCY t - "` s•' x,t I M1 by affirm that them is conewct on lending agency for the performance n. res =� or the work Por which 'his re'Iml iii; souse (Sec. 1097 Civ C) Lens N e - j Y Z . Lc d Aeeree., 1 rht state thatth bo information is s ra U� + L Fy lapplicationd w r l g crply with all ,, and d' d t o mining 7.O is building con and bends, ne th pnanmtivea of th s city nt enter upon t ar,-til the above-nacoti ion toar, ropcny for ly, p Ir - Wlx aid le , demmfyure" ph ss ltieCp ofC pcitino against m ZCil l iab lt(W)agrccto judgments. nsice t. a Dense h ch Y, n any y nuagain t said ma City y of lM1 gm t gotm p t rRr - APPA NTµ SANG wfLL COMPLY R'ITH ALT. NONP`("lYr s m Cii Ef} L- INS -. s.3o p Issued by: Date gra < I nr reHAZARDOU . T E L LALS '. •� ,Dale Re -roofs HAZARDOUS DISCLOSUR' Will Ne pprc t r fm wilding occ pat mm sit handl hnrallo mm ' I asdef -' Type of Roof --- YP as m by, th C penmo M I Coe Ch purr 9 12 d the He lth nd S f ,y Cod Sect n 3553 l ), OY O. No "t') .i. t - _--" '".. . i ' ' """'_"'•-• ^• • "w w . s + ii t 'a i/J. `51'1. d. xlttil-, All roofs shall be inspected poor to. any. roofing. material, being installed ' -hazardous ll iruri t re Wilding `par es p t aMrcee hand emn urination fond by the E y Arta rt enaoty M1lanag m District?I ❑Y. ...�,. ❑N If a roof Is installed without first obtaining an inspection, - I a recto remove - g P g all new materials for inspection. Applicant understands and will Comply .:: P .. .; _PPS._... -with all"non-point "stilarce regulations.,. - - 1 ha d N< hares do marc al requirements under Ch lite 6.95,6f the Cal fo Health & S f ty Code S t one 25505 25513 and 25534. I understitinfliat if building '� snot cu dy has, motion, IMI it nyresponsibility I notify the �OfAPPIIC ---_ - c p nt era ine which anus, Ne t lin r to Is ce n Ce im fOcp -5306Z Ignatureant '.`, All roof coverings [o be Class "B" or better o ouranntmimea"m - .; ,... .. _ ...... . _,_ OFFICE 9 r. CITY OF CUPERTINO Building Division 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3228 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Building Department Subject: Reroofing policy for the City of Cupertino. 1. Prior to permit issuance, you must agree to comply with 1997 UBC Standards and manufactures specifications on reroofing. 2. New roof coverings shall not be applied without first obtaining all inspection and written approval from the building inspector. A final inspection and approval shall be obtained from the building inspector when the reroofing is completed. 3. All roofs shall be inspected prior to any roofing installation. 4. To receive a final sign off from the City the following steps are required. 1) Preinspection and/or tear off approval. 2) In progress inspection approval. 3) Final inspection approval. a) Spark arrester installation. S. If plywood is installed, a plywood nail inspection is required. 6. Any roofing which is applied without first obtaining an inspection, will require the removal of all new material down to the sheathing so that the proper City inspection can be performed. IMPORTANT: 1. Flat roofs must have a minimum of 1/4" per foot slope and demonstrate that there is no ponding. 2. An I.C.B.O. report is required to be on the job site at the time of inspection. We understand the above policy on reroofing and will comply with this policy. Homeowners Name: --L CIA6,9- /9A U 4W1221 AdjL /03-3-5- Reroofing Company Nie: Applicants Sig,*Ire: Joee Antonucci (Chief Building Official) Fi4,A4LL0Nzc,- 'Ant 6/25/01 'wv - Co . S13olo Z RPR 18 2002 2:28PM HP LASERJET 3200 SUBMITTALP 14 hl SL'EANING A COMMON LANGUAGE; FOR THE PROPER USE OF THIS BOOKLET, IT IS ESSENTIALTHAT WE UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER'S M LANGUAGE. A GLOSSARY OF TERMS HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF THE BOOK. IN ADDITION, BELOW ARE ILLUSTRATIONS WHICH IDENTIFY THE ROOFS STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. I �� MAY 0 8° 2002 ROOF DETAIL uLl 1. Roof Roller 6. Bearing We0 2. Continuous Ceiling Joist or Rafter Tie 7. Slope inches of rise per 12' of run 3. Perlin APpfZ01VEQ8. Overhang 4. Strut 5. Horizontal idge Beace or am ACCORDANCE WITH THE911OLd'Riggers (r SES AND .d CES 1501-1 fppq Ci1P.ERTINO� o�� "A� I' �Gw`�iL This set of plat—, allu be kept on the job at all times and it is un lawful to make any changesmissions obons rs on some Without write of Cupertino. the bui f The st i rt SNALL approval of the violation orStateoany Low. HORIZONTALOrd1DSTRUT SPAN RIDGE BEAM \ \ ROOF RAFTER OVERHANG FSP. No. 16286 W. 5-70-07 OVERHANG DISCLAIMER: Time Charts and Telles are made available by Monier Inc. lu the sole purpose, of assessft the eWweble spare of specific members in wasting roof sbucmres only. They arm r4l in my way intended to be used as either a gilds or a racanmendabon for rocs streVnening or resauctuft Any tlumges to esl019 drUXUes need to be recammenled by a qualfied engineu AJs%a the "ass rued condiime" do not ssler, eve roof should be erarolned by a sbuctural engineer. P.5 • (,j rp SUBMITTAL Nping F-1 o. APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF, ORDINANCES CUPERTINO DES AN. DATE SIGN YELJI�--- " v, rd This set 0 planVspecifications MUST be kept 011 the job at all times and it is un. - gas or alterations lawful to make any from on same without written permission the building Dept., City of Cupertino. The stamping Of this plan and specifications SHALL NQC'\'u' held to nermit or to be all 3pp'.ovaj.Z,,jj- viojatj:�jf any provision of an/Wly Ordina - elor State Low. T e c h n I c 8 I S p e c l f l c 8 t l 0 n s ,V is it' MonlerCifetilesWeb.Site at = '- Y ;1 -• r www monierlifehle coin '� *�' '" c t 1 i t .l 3 yy CedarLite Size and Coverage; Individual The nominally 19-1/4"x 19'1 iol At 3" minimum headlap, approximately 120 field tiles will Fur, M` [nforinagon Call,the Moni&Llfitile ' • rover 100 square fee[ of roof area. Weight a. in Place: Installed weight per square approximately 560 lbs. 1=800, 2=REROOFt V7 3 7 6 6,3 T CORPORATE OFFICE e ' r ).A Y ,' _ P O. Box 19792 Irvuie CA 62 " Tapered 9J.�2 y Ridge d & Hip Eave Starter Shake / Slate Size and Coverage: Individual Tile nominally 16-1/2"x 13". $ALES:OFFICES A ONWIDE At 3" minimum headlap, approximately 88 field tiles will cover `' u _ P PP r r PHOENIX ARIZONA+,; Q'sgvs feet of roof area. 1 . 7 f , e Weight in P cc:Installed roti <r uare approxi at c' t' GILROY CALIFORNIA-, 59616s. c �LATHROP CALIFORNIA 4 1 RIALTO CALIPORNIA �\ SAN.BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA .1111-1 0. 11 411 4Y I - t 'STOCKTON1CALIFORNIA {, 90° 3 Side 3 Side Hip Apex Flat 3 DENVER - COrtLORADO e t Ridge Starter 3 & 4 Way Rake Il •�fi o{;t 1 J Split Shake Size and Coverage. Individual Tile nominally 16-1/2"x 13". r�POCH FF R mice headlap, approximately 88 field ides will cover 1:AKE ygr S 100 squ a feet f roof area. - Welght Placr nstalled weight per square approximately KAPOL HAWA 5961bs. KANS CITY:• NSAS .,HEND RS NEVADA ` a �,1 :KATY TEXA TACOMA •. WASHINGTON 90° 3 Side 3 Side Hip Apex Flat • Rake Ridge Starter 3 & 4 Way `. Espana Size and Coverage: Individual Tile nominally 17"x 12-318". At 3" minimum headlap, approximately 89 field tiles will cover . Tile is an internationally decnized Premium - 100 square feet of roof area. y o . g Weight in Place: Installed weight per square approximately ". roofing piudnCt'providing the qualities of 590lbs. ..timeless beauty, fire saferyand durability setting' standard for roofing excellence:: Automated o Moni tori production be techniques enable Monier extremely le el l the affordable alternative. :with an extremely low life -cycle cost r Code Approvals, Complies with all budding codes Trim Hip Starter Capri 3 -Way Capri Capri Apex inclan including but not limited to ICBG, SBCCId SFBC ,. -: Fire Test, Easily passes Class A.Tests to ASTM E108 Villa Size and Coverage: Individual Tile nominally 16-1/2"x 13". and UBC Standard 1$ 2 At 3" minimum headlap, approximately 90 field tiles will coverFreeze/Thaw Areas: Passes Freezing and Thawing ` _ 100 square feet of roof area ' Weight in Place: Installed weight per square approximately Test of ASTM -C67 580 lbs. �.Disdaimer: The pruned colors'shown in. this ' O I r brochure may vary from actual currentrev t, Before malung a final selection, be sine too review 'actual ide samples and roof mstallitlons Please 'r + contact your local salesffic oe' for further asststance Capri Capri Apex 1' Trim Hip Starter Capri 3 -Way install anon Please consult current printed', e' ' },MonierLlfettle Installation Guide for,apphration ` t recommendations. � - [ The above technical specifications do n constitute a warranty by MonierLifetile Ye The only applicable warranty with respect '! to this product is the Limited Lifetime Product -' Wairranty, (fully transferable;non prorated) Member of contained in MonierLlfenle's,product hterature res WUW For R N MonierLifetde is a Proud Partner with dated most recently prior to the installation of F'jTCga[e DW811ILg'S lf�t'r Habitat for Humanity this roduct tin the owner's roof ' OUAROrm CORROMna. Natimul Tik R.,(.g 1 P International 02MI MOnierltifnBa RU43-1tev'2101 0 CITY OF CUPERTINO BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK DIVISION Date : June 26,2002 Address: 10355 Farallone Control#: Permit#:reroof BruceD Reroof submittal letter 6/24/02 Technicon Engineering Inc. 1. The letter does not address the Departments requirements. The entire roof needs to be inspected and summarized. The existing and additional unit loading to the rafters (with steep slope adjustment) needs to be stated as well as the live loads. The factory truss and beam support needs to be clarified • and it clearly stated that these are adequate for their use. A statement that the increase in roof weight does not cause the existing lateral load conventional bracing to be exceeded, should also be made. Wfaral lone355.doc C'ON ENGINEERING SERVICES, Inc APPROVED July 9, 2002 COn'lructiun TeslinK & Aspecdon • Georeehnicul & E"ipq ra[ul G7girtgHrt�e H COPY CUP. DES ND 0 88.3 V & Clare Brumm / SZ� 10355 Farallone Drive DATE__ U Cupertino, California 95014 SIGNED_ j. • This set of 1 ans and specifications MUST } SUBJECT: Additional Calculations be kept on he jab at all times and it is un Roof Inspection Report , IS 1if lawful to make any changes or alterations 10355 Farallone brive lG L U `�� � on same without written permission from Cupertino, CaliforriIlIa 95014 U the building Dept., City of Cupertino. IU[.' JUL 11 12002 The stamping of this plan and specification Mr. & Mrs. Brumm: S� ll. NOT be held to permit or to be an �Gy trr,oval of the violation of any provision, In accordance with the requirements-ofthe City of-Cupertino, TECHNICON Engineering or State Law Services, Inc., has completed additional calculations for our previous inspection of the existing field- fabricated roof truss system at 10335 Farallone Drive, Cupertino, California. The purpose of these calculations was to verify the slenderness ratio (1/r) of the 2" x 6" struts above the vaulted ` ceiling, and to determine the required connections (size and number of nails). A The subject struts were previously measured to be 8'-7" in length. As shown on the attached / calculations, the slenderness ratio of the struts is in excess of the maximum allowed value of 50. However, doubling these struts, which would be the simplest form of increasing the strength of the struts, reduces the slenderness ratio to 29, which is an acceptable value. in doubling the struts, the new lumber should be joined with the existing using 16d common nails, face nailedat 16 inches on-center. , r To determine the number of nails required for the end connections• the compressive force applied to each strut was first calculated as approximately 493 pounds. Using 10d common nails with a capacity of 90 pounds force each, the required number of nails was determined to be 6 per connection. Therefore, the new strut members should be attached to the purlin using three 10d nails, toenailed, per side. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you should have questions or require additional information, please contact us at (559) 276-9311. Respectfully, �' 4'�Gy fjE—JL � TECHNICON ENGINE RING SERVICES, INC, r� I 11UlkQ `� ���%�"`' 4C. PR/ ql� l'Fj. u No. C59372 Ryan . Privett, RCE Exp. X30 Manager - Geotechnical Engineering Department "'ESMA/NSERVER�Pmocts18600-8699te6ea.003.doe `rj CML. 9T � CQ% Attachment: Calculations � �" FCFC, �tF . "4.y�r-�pt� I CC: Mr. Bruce Donahue, City of Cupertino 4539 N. Brawley 0108 • Fresno, CA 93722 • Phone (559) 276-9311 %I. rr •Fax (559) 276-9344 �0/20'd untnv rrrv.,nrn�. err c - C . J1JL-0'1-002 12 3 TECHNICON F. •'04 RSvisod Roellnspec8on Rsport TES#8888.2 10335 Faralonne Ddve. Cupertino, Cakfamia Page 2 Based on our observations we found that the existing structural roof system for the areas that �l were inspected is sufficient for the application of the sub 6.0 psf Monier Lifeble concrete tiles. The increase in roof weight should not cause the existing lateral load conventional bracing to be exceeded. Furthermore, additional areas not previously inspected which are of similar construction, i.e., grade and size of lumber, spacing, and with a maximum allowable unbraced span less than that noted above, will also be suitable to support the subject increased loading conditions. Therefore. if it is determined that the remainder of the roof system is of similar 0 We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you should have questions or require additional information, please contact us at (559) 276-9311. Respectfully, TECHNICONt`ENG ,JNEERING SERVICES, INC. .t".! Ryan K. Privett, RCE Manager - Geotechnical Engineering Oepanment M ESMAINSERVEc • TECANICOAV M(AN CM.Wi SCRYK6t At.. No.C59372 93G-1 f THE CITY Of. ORDINANCES This set of P a ano speculoumb moo, be kept on we job at all times and it is un lawful to make any changes or alterations on same without written permission from the building Dept., City of Cupertino. The stamping of this plan and specifications SHALL NOT be held to permit or to be en' approval of the violation of any provisionv of nnV Clty nrilinence or State Law. Li;' JUL 112002 J.LU-L .7- *Tr ........ ... . jo eRpFE VA a 1, -TE P iL 14 6 `vQyk' P �� �-TLE —IkLv, ��P-cr' LU No. rn I Ex.9 6'Oc V91L g F C AI-W aaa ryrr I' APPRO INS Alte;?C015ANcE WITH H CIT: OF fix= i "j( RArl-VZ ADIS 4 -S c IT— , DES/No upto SIGNED --w-n"sMUSSI Ou This SaF70i Us and specifications be kept on .,a job A all times and it un alteration, WiNjUj to make any changes Or on same ..vithout written permission from Dept,, City Of Cupertino. d' and specifications the building The stamping Of this plan t or to be an At No. T be held to MITI' rbvisiw Of any P RY "�—Ur'dinunce or 11811 'Ste-pA,.o s-rc, of Any Of r dy S0 OK MAILS OPJLY) 4 MA I? ------ :5NCAP- OALL QER 1992 U64 TABLE L-.7,,ubj.6v 51�gjj-r�s- J&J A416'10.c— rAe-f- "(AILED 7-C 1&=,29.75 S PL 4 t. L -772 1 13UC8.59�t Is L7— Iz JU4 1 1 2002 U ro 2GE �Er2 5 r�u 7 =9.7s psF ,c /6.58 s� — y93 AWLS 67 NODINHO31 zz:OT ZOOZ-Go--inf • ECHNICON } a ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. AA� FAX TRANSMITTAL To: I M� Sol 0 Z azo 5��(6 Date: %/9�0 -Z- Company: /(1n !E�!� Pim r) No. of Pages 3 (Including Cover Page) FAX Number: '7a? -% 2 7- 5 3 3 3 From: r • Techni on Engineering Services, Inc. Project: (��'L(lt frc LNa�cnnc �a7u,«vv Subject: Contents/Comments: 34,ALBf2Wey #10$ o Fresno, California 93722-3950 Phone: (559) 276-9311 - FAX: (559) 276-9344 www.technicon.net - E-MAIL: info@technicon.net. 20/T0'd NOOINH031 T2:0T awE-60-nnr TECAW ON ENGINEERING SERVICES, Ina July 9, 2002 Omsiructlav Resling & Inspecrion - Genrechnicul & Envemnmewul Lngineering Charles & Clare Brumm 16355 Farallone Drive Cupertino, California 95014 SUBJECT: Additional Calculations Roof Inspection Report 10355 Farallone Drive Cupertino, California 95014 Mr. & Mrs. Brumm: TES #8688.3 In accordance with the requirements of the City of Cupertino, TECHNICON Engineering Services, Inc., has completed additional calculations for our previous inspection of the existing field - fabricated roof truss system at 10335 Farallone Drive, Cupertino, California. The purpose of these calculations was to verify the slenderness ratio (1/r) of the 2" x 6" struts above the vaulted ceiling, and to determine the required connections (size and number of nails). The subject struts were previously measured to be 8'-7" in length. As shown on the attached calculations, the slenderness ratio of the struts is in excess of the maximum allowed value of 50. • However, doubling these struts, which would be the simplest form of increasing the strength of the struts, reduces the slenderness ratio to 29, which is an acceptable value. In doubling the struts, the new lumber should be joined with the existing using 16d common nails, face nailed, at 16 inches on -center. To determine the number of nails required for the end connections, the compressive force applied to each strut was first calculated as approximately 493 pounds. Using 10d common nails with a capacity of 90 pounds force each, the required number of nails was determined to be 6 per connection. Therefore, the new strut members should be attached to the purlin using three 10d nails, toenailed, per,side. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you should have questions or require additional information, please contact us at (559) 276-9311. Respectfully, TECHNICON ENGINE RING SERVICES, INC. YL1 Ryanrnett, RCE Manager - Geotechnical Engineering Department IITESMA/NSERVERIProject518800-869918688.003, 00c • Attachment: Calculations CC: Mr. Bruce Donahue, City of Cupertino -" r�rES•,;,�•-t �`�e��PNK• PRI No. C59372! Exp. civtk- 4539 N. Brawley 0108 • Fresno, CA 93722 Phone (559) 276-9311 • Fax (559) 276.9344 rrrrr nrr'rcrr.nnr•na. arc r _ r i.r, rr . nm.�ri•. n„vrrT £OiZO'd NDDINH731 Z£:OT ZOOZ-69--inf £�t• d �dlol ro335=ARAI-Co�/� mak. . ' G/J�fQTii,IO , CiQ VAuL.�cD Gc+Lr�lc, 5-rlzLj-r f epg RcE+`tE/(T w ':�� G.. X I s /��•J 1 2••,� RIPLIPJ &• voo £0i£6'd ExIsT/rjcp RA --._....._ -- u Y.....� .�. i� R i DC+E r•"= QRpFI vGAp�c r IZAy/o = ! 59 > So .. Flo Cao. r �ou�jGF 5T2U7: a 29 SO OK AIL/�lln ((or9Mo'I 1/AILS ON�y� , QER 1997 cJBG TABcE .2s-ZE- 6-1 No. C59372 Exp.q--2z>,= %O 14;' Ei /Srr/.JG � s 7 2"X fo' SrRUT 56-eoN0 S�o2y Fr,�IZ �oisT kleweNT 5�EAQ r,JAt-L C�,UBI.Ei 5 rQJTS% /(, A7 /(o o.c, , FAcf r/AMEV t✓oN.�ecr/a.�s PL 4 LL= /3.751 16 = .29. 75 ?ts TRIBU'rAQY AREJ= r8.5S"� g" 1 x 2'o.c, lf.SB�sF ro,?GE SER -I rfu -7 = Z 9. 75 p3; x /6. 6O S� = y93 UG cLC /A/9S /0d CorJMaN AIA/L5 '-h-- `j0 *IEA No. RfouiRCo = N473/90 = 5--5 lOd r/AIL-5 M•/v./GaK•JEG:/pN C3 /EP Spic, NOD INHD31 Z£:oT zow-60-inf 3UL-03-2002 12:33 TECHNICON P.01iO4 • To 0 TECHNIC01o; ENGINEERING SER VICES, INC. FAX TRANSMITTAL Company: C IC5-C C'J F QAIVQ n FAX Number: (` O6) - -�-3333 From: Bela iZec Technicon Engineering Services, Inc. 4 Project: I°35"5- FA RA-i'ov�e �RIuB subject: 2 Contents/Comments: .5 1i 8 4 Date: `% 3 0 2— No. of Pages / (Including C ; er Page) 4539 N. 131awley #108 . Fresno, California 93722-3950 Phone: (559) 276-9311 • FAX: (559) 276-9344 www.technicon.net. E-MAIL: info@technicon.net 7UL-03-2002 12:33 TECHNICON P.02iO4 TE` ��; ON E-N"GINEERING SERVICES, Inc. July 2, 2002 Concrruction Testing & /n.speciion • Geotechnical & E,tvovnmenral Engineer"',. TES #8688.2 • Charles & Clare Brumm 10355 Farallone Drive Cupertino, California 95014 SUBJECT: Revised Roof Inspection Report 10355 Farallone Drive Cupertino, California 95014 Mr. & Mrs. Brumm: In accordance with your request and authorization, TECHNICON Engineering Services, Inc., has completed an inspection of the existing field -fabricated roof truss system at 10335 Farallone Drive, Cupertino, California. At the time of our inspection the previously existing wood shake roof had been completely removed. The roof covering the northern one-half of the structure (2no story, over the bedroom areas) had been replaced with sub 6.0 pounds per square foot (psf) Monier Lifetile concrete roofing tiles. However, roof operations over the southern one-half of the house had been suspended pending the roof inspection. It was Technicon's understanding that the inspection was to include only the southern portion of the house, predominantly the vaulted ceiling area and stairwell. The term "roof truss" or "roof trusses", as used in this report pertains to the Our inspection consisted of a visual observation of the existing roof system, and evaluation of the system for conformance with applicable sections of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. The main trusses of the structure span approximately 24 feet 4 inches -(horizontal projection of 17 feet 4 inches) from the edge of the first story to the ridge above the second story. The measured ridge height above the second story portion of the residence was 4' 6". All roof trusses utilized 2" x 6" construction on 24" spacing with a maximum unbraced span of 8' 7" (horizontal projection of 6 feet 2 inches). The maximum tributary loaded area was determined to be approximately 49 square feet. Ceiling joists associated with the southernmost 201 story portion were 2" x 6" on 24" spacing. The maximum slope of the roof was determined to be approximately 8.56 inches vertical per 12 inches horizontal, or about 9/12. The portion of the roof above the northern half of the home was substantially flatter than the southern portion.. The unit loading of the previous wood shake roof was estimated at 8 pounds per square foot dead load (3 psf shingles + 1.5 psf Vx4" stripping + 1.5 psf felt + 2.0 psf top chord of truss) plus 16 psf live load (per Table 16-C 1997 UBC). The unit loading of the new tile roof is estimated at 12.5 pounds per square foot dead load (6 psf tile + 1.5 psf 1"x4" stripping + 1.5 psf felt + 1.5 psf plywood sheathing + 2.0 psf top chord of truss) plus 16 psf live load. Due to the 9/12 pitch of the roof, the roof dead load, for purposes of this evaluation, was increased by 10 percent to 13.75 psf. Assuming the 2" x 6" trusses were constructed using No. 2 Douglas Fir (typical for California). the trusses were assigned a design allowable bending stress (Fb) of 1,535 pounds per square inch (psi) and a modulus of elasticity (E) of 1,600,000 psi, per 1997 UBC Table 234V -V-1. Utilizing 1997 UBC Table 23 -IV -R-3 (LL = 20 psf + DL = 15 psf), a maximum allowable unbraced span of • 10 feet — 10 inches (horizontal projection) was determined for the 2" x 6" trusses with 24 inch spacing. 4539 N. Brawley #103 • Fresno, CA 93722 • Phone (S59) 276-9311 • Fax (559) 276-9344 WWW.TECHNICON.NET • E-MAIL: INFO )TECHNICON.NET JUL-03-2002 12:34 TECHNICON P.03iO4 ~ Revised Roof Inspection Report • TES#8688.2 10335 Faralonne Drive, Cupertino, Califomia Page 2 ►� J r 1 L J Based on our observations we found that the existing structural roof system for the areas that were inspected is sufficient for the application of the sub 6.0 psf Monier Lifetile concrete tiles. The increase in roof weight should not cause the existing lateral load conventional bracing to be exceeded. Furthermore, additional areas not previously inspected which are of similar construction, i.e., grade and size of lumber, spacing, and with a maximum allowable unbraced span less than that noted above, will also be suitable to support the subject increased loading conditions. Therefore, if it is determined that the remainder of the roof system is of similar We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you should have questions or require additional information, please contact us at (559) 276-9311. Respectfully, TECHNICON ENGZ1� NEERING SERVICES, INC. Dtrivett, t� w R ya RCE Manager - Geotechnical Engineering Department \\TESMAINSERV ER\Projects\8600.8699\8688-002.doc TECHNICON £NGINEENNG SER✓IU..f: Ma PRff, \' U� BJP FTS No. C59372 E c Ex. 930.03 ' P i J j CMI Ph: 00 Comments: M City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 PH: (408) 777-3354 FX: (408) 777-3333 From - A ^ uilding 0 Code Enforcement [3 Community Development • Public Works • Traffic r ED City Channel. C1 City Clerk_ 0 City Manager r, I -n El Serrice Center 10555 Mary Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 PH: (408) 777-3250 F)(: (408) 777-3399 Printed on Recycled Paper 0 ON .L'TI1S321 0 S39Vd 00,00 31HI 30VsfI TT:91 £0/LO RIVIIL INVIS OI NOI,L03NN00 tVC69LZ6GST6 -131 NIOUOHNIN03 V£9t 'ON YH/XjI 0312-WHOO ION SVA N01IONni yi, 180dad YI NONN3 t UU LPI ONJINBdAD AILID TT:91 ZO/CO/LO