R-2002-05b
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: (408) 777-3308
FAX: (408) 777-3333
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF
CUPERJINO
May 16, 2002
Mr. Janet Lowy
10362 Bret Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION LETTER - Application R-2002-05
This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting
of May 15, 2002, approving a 33 square foot addition and a 560 square foot second story
addition on an existing residence, according to Design Review Resolution No. 78.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within one year, it shall expire on
May 15, 2003.
Also note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of the
decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing which will be scheduled
before the Planning Commission.
Gary Chao
Assistant Planner
Enclosures:
Resolution No. 78
Cc: David Tamira, 2801 Moorpark Avenue, #14, San Jose 95128
g:plalllrillg/DRC COlllmittee! action/eltn R-2002-03.doc
Pnoted on Recycled Paper
R-2002-05
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 78
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A 33
SQUARE FOOT FIRST STORY ADDITION AND A 560 SQUARE FOOT SECOND STORY
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 2,297 SQUARE FOOT RESIDENCE RESULTING IN FLOOR
AREA RATIO OF 36.9%.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
R-2002-05
Janet Lowy
10362 Bret Avenue
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertinol and the Design Review Committee has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The project is consistent with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, the zoning
ordinance and the purposes of this title.
2. The granting of this permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
3. The proposed residence has been designed to be in scale and harmonious with the
general neighborhood.
4. The proposed residence is consistent with design guidelines developed by the Director
of Community Development.
5. The proposed residence will not result in significant adverse visual impacts as viewed
from adjoining properties.
Resolution No. 78
May 15, 2002
Page 2
R-2002-05
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the
conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application R-2002-05 set
forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, May 15, 2002, and are
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED PROTECT
This approval is for a 33 square foot first story addition and a 560 square foot second story
addition with a floor area ration of 36.9%based on the plan set entitled "The Lowy
Residence."
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May 2002, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Saadati and Chairman Corr
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I sl Ciddy Wordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
G: \ PlmllliJlg \ DRC\ res \ R-2002-03 res. doc
Isl Chuck Corr
Chuck Corr, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
\!!CII~IIY ,Wf
r:2~
t,'!
~ ~ ~
j ~ i,
~~ j L
;5i1HI
~'~ H~
~if ~H~
1
~'I!
~~
8 ~ ;l,
CJ ~ ~
~!. I
'-c, "
~il ~1lr.B
>': ~i*i
""!'ll
~I~ dj~
~WJ~.... .~""'"""",.,,,""...!'['.'.'.'.D..-."'..].".".....-....,.. .'.......-.......--...ill.-.'_.--....'....... ..... ...., .......... "/./'.. ..' ........"..... ..........-...-.~...,...-'..'-'..'~ .'1..,".-..1, .... . .....'.. ...' //",,-
Y ....~~.~. ,I """""~~
I . m-If~~grr[CEf-111t~lL~' ~~~i~lc
I ',,',^,-,
'C1(~H1511)r f.L rVA[,O:,.1
r:IXV!\1I0N
,-ll'f 511/f. n:'V,\1I0~J
rr~m
1__]]
..r-;W\I........J,
2
"
~
"
"
"
'l
~
~ ~
~~
4. ~
kc
LXI'olNC, 11,001< 1'1"'","
3
i!-CJOf2 f'I A~J
,-
f :~':
" ~:
I'
W.--.r:/I. ..
L..}J
I--~ rr-
.~)~-::~:
/,,;""/"r
.\ !F",r:'I.I'O'H='~
u-
u
rJk'CW)()'7['r)
flOOf' f"lA~1
I
}e
II
,I
Ld
{
f'lfCl1<UllUDiIJ
'J
~
~
~
~
\'L
o
(5
-'
"
'"
4