R-2000-03b
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014_
Telephone: (408) 777-3308
FAX: (408) 777-3333
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
July 27,2000
Ms. Holly Hartman
1540-A Parkmoor
San Jose, CA 95128
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION LETTER - Application 03-R-OO.
This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting of
July 26, 2000, approving residential design review to construct a new 3,161 square foot, two-
story residence, according to Design Review Resolution No. 11.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within one year, it shall expire on
July 26,2001.
Also note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of the decision. If
this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing which will be scheduled before the City
Council.
~M.
Assistant Planner
Enclosure:
Resolution No. 11
c: William Choe
g:planning/Drc/3rOOaction letter
Printed on Recycled Paper
03-R-00
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION 11
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A NEW
TWO STORY 3,312 SQ. FT. RESIDENCE WITH A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 43%.
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public
hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has
satisfied the following requirements:
I. The project will be consistent with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, any applicable
specific plans, zoning ordinances and the purposes of this title.
2. The granting of the special permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, in that the second story proposed is smaller than many
newly built two-story homes in the neighborhood.
3. The proposed addition is harmonious in scale and design with the general neighborhood and has
received positive comments from City's Architectural Consultant.
4. The proposed addition/home is generally consistent with design guidelines developed by the
Director of Community Development, in that the second story is sufficiently setback from the first
story wall planes and the eave lines of the first story are compatible with the neighborhood.
5. The proposed addition/home will not result in significant adverse visual impacts as viewed from
adjoining properties, as privacy protection planting is being provided along the property lines to
shield views to and from the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, the second story deck exception is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are
enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based
and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 03-R-00 set forth in the Minutes of
the Design Review Committee meeting of, July 26,2000, and are incorporated by reference as though
fully set forth herein.
Resolution No. 11
Page 2
03-R-OO
July 26, 2000
SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
03-R-00
William Choe (Holly Hartman)
10388 Byrne Avenue
SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
I. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the plan set entitled "Custom Home For: William Choe" dated June 6,2000.
2. WINDOW MODIFICATION
Windows shall be reduced in height by one foot to provide for space between the roof eave line and
the window, as recommended by the City's Architectural Consultant in a letter dated June 22,
2000. This does not apply to the window in the garage, nor the entry area.
3. LlGHTWELL SCREENING
Lightwells visible from the public right-of-way must be screened with a low hedge.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July, 2000, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review
Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Doyle, Stevens
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/ Ciddy Wordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
/s/ Jerry Stevens
Jerry Stevens
Design Review Committee
W1Jlr.mninwdrc/03-R-OO resocdoc
'"
:2
lJ
~
::l
;:]
:;
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
~...I s
-0 -t
<
"'.
o
"
!
u
!II~
!~
I
'"1
I:)
tt:
'-'
:.
~
:1
~
(13 (2.'
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
u
~
r-<
~
~
C
=,
'"
o
:l:
U
;::
"
~
$
SECTION
WEST ELEVATION
"II
<
! .~
i:,~ , W
11"".;"
!.\..5\.~.
!~:
!o.~
I=!~
SOUTH ELEVATION
I-=.,cc'.:::=::::::c::::--- __-----".::.:::-.;-..'...-'J
SECTION
~I
EAST ELEVATION
!.. < I
:;; -' '
"" <
I ~
<
"'
~~.
""
I~'
I.I~
""
C
:I;
U
LEGEND
=-L1.. -.
C}-l':N.!L~'
'-o-''JI..'~'
-o-"-"='. ~
....". ,
~_'ll.J.'''"'~..i.llL.'
......., ..." ,." ~""" ..",
,,,.,..._"... ~,...I.
"" ..
o .
~ ~
'" -----'-4-
--t\+ ,-'Ij
.::-.::.z-=...~ -"L.r.L...- E"'''''I.. _Uh ''''0,1'
__L__ '" U...
--1--- ~,'l.~:.~..""" i..",,,)
... ...." ~-I'"
~
.I.::!:i!.f~Al 5lC:,n
ALC.AZAR AVENllE
~6 ~ ~.A:.f
TYf!CA:..jICTIDN
BYRNE AVENUE
SHEET INDEX
SHEET I - GRADING a DRAINAGE PLAN
SHEET e - STANDARD DETAILS
SHEET S .. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
~
"
~
~
z
i
~
~
~