13. Peet's Coffee appeal
IT
cc-/3 -Cs, -67 .:tt 13
Grace Schmidt
From: Ciddy Wordell
Sent: Monday, February 26, 20078:21 AM
To: Grace Schmidt
Subject: FW: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
r'~" Hi, ... ,
L~~ ;J ,
._--'"
r ' I
,
\
~ ~
Grace, John Volckmann requests a continuance of the Peet's appeal from March 6 to March 20. Richard is ok with it, so please
show it as continued to March 20. Thanks, Ciddy
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Lowenthal
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 20073:45 PM
To: Steve Piasecki
Cc: Ciddy Wordell; David Knapp
Subject: FW: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Steve,
I need a determination from you about how many parking spaces ped access will require on the Volkmann side of the fence.
don't think it's worth losing four spaces, but I do think it's worth losing one.
RL
From: John Volckmann [mailto:john@JVAProperties.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:27 AM
Cc: CynthiaW@cupertino.org; stevep@cupertino.org
Subject: RE: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Hello Richard
I requested and was granted a continuance, until 3/6/07, of the Council's hearing re; your appeal of Pete's Coffee's request to
open at 5:30 am and the issue of pedestrian access through the SCOC property. The reason is that I suffer tremendously due to
allergies in the Bay Area at this time of the year. Nothing seems to alleviate this condition except staying away, which is why I
am currently residing in the desert. Fortunately, the pollen count from the Juniper and Olive trees in significantly reduced by the
end of March. I would very much like to personally attend the appeal hearing and would appreciate your support in continuing
the hearing until 3/20/07.
Regards,
John
-----Orig i na I Message-----
From: Anne Risberg [mailto:ARisberg@MattesonRealty.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:48 AM
To: John Volckmann
Subject: FW: SCOC Issues - peet's Appeal
Hi John - can you provide the reason why you want to postpone (per Ciddy's email below)? Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: Ciddy Wordell [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:43 AM
To: Anne Risberg
Cc: Steve Piasecki
2/26/2007
cc-!3-Cs.-67 .:tt 13
Grace Schmidt
From: Ciddy Wordell
Sent: Monday, February 26,20078:21 AM
To: Grace Schmidt
Subject: FW: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Grace, John Volckmann requests a continuance of the Peet's appeal from March 6 to March 20. Richard is ok with it, so please
show it as continued to March 20. Thanks, Ciddy
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Lowenthal
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 20073:45 PM
To: Steve Piasecki
Cc: Ciddy Wordell; David Knapp
Subject: FW: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Steve,
I need a determination from you about how many parking spaces ped access will require on the Volkmann side of the fence.
don't think it's worth losing four spaces, but I do think it's worth losing one.
RL
From: John Volckmann [mailto:john@JVAProperties.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:27 AM
Cc: CynthiaW@cupertino.org; stevep@cupertino.org
Subject: RE: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Hello Richard
I requested and was granted a continuance, until 3/6/07, of the Council's hearing re; your appeal of Pete's Coffee's request to
open at 5:30 am and the issue of pedestrian access through the SCOC property. The reason is that I suffer tremendously due to
allergies in the Bay Area at this time of the year. Nothing seems to alleviate this condition except staying away, which is why I
am currently residing in the desert. Fortunately, the pollen count from the Juniper and Olive trees in significantly reduced by the
end of March. I would very much like to personally attend the appeal hearing and would appreciate your support in continuing
the hearing until 3/20/07.
Regards,
John
-----Orig i na I Message-----
From: Anne Risberg [mailto:ARisberg@MattesonRealty.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:48 AM
To: John Volckmann
Subject: FW: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Hi John - can you provide the reason why you want to postpone (per Ciddy's email below)? Thanks,
-----Orig i na I Message-----
From: Ciddy Wordell [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:43 AM
To: Anne Risberg
Cc: Steve Piasecki
2/26/2007
Subject: RE: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
You'll need to provide a reason. Normally the City Council practice has been to grant one continuance. Since Richard
Lowenthal is the appellant, he might have some feelings on how long he wants to wait to address his issues. Do you
have a compelling reason? You might want to run it by him before you formally request a postponement. Ciddy Wordell
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Risberg [mailto:ARisberg@MattesonRealty.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:38 AM
To: Ciddy Wordell; Roberts, Melanie; John Volckmann
Subject: SCOC Issues - Peet's Appeal
Ciddy - would it be possible to delay the Peet's appeal to the 2nd Council meeting in March (it is on the
agenda for March 6 right now)?
Please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Anne Risberg
Regional Property Manager
Matteson Realty Services, Inc.
One Lagoon Drive #200
Redwood City, CA 94065-1562
(650) 802-1800
(650) 802-1811 fax
2/26/2007