RDA 12-06-06
CUPEI\IINO
APPROVED MINUTES
CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Regular Adjourned Meeting
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
ROLL CALL
At 9:28 p.m. Chairwoman Kris Wang called the meeting to order in the City Council Chamber,
10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California.
Present: Chairwoman Kris Wang, Vice Chair Patrick Kwok, and Redevelopment Agency
members Richard Lowenthal, Orrin Mahoney, and Dolly Sandoval. Absent: None.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Approve the minutes from the June 20,2006 meeting. (Continued from December 5).
Kwok/Lowenthal moved and seconded to approve the minutes of June 20, 2006. The
motion carried unanimously.
B. Conduct a public hearing and consider adopting a resolution adopting the Valleo
Redevelopment Proiect Area 2006-2010 Implementation Plan, APN Nos. 316-20-037,
043, 052, 055, 062, 063, 064, 066, 067, 080, 081, and 082, Resolution No. 06-02.
(Continued from December 5).
Community Development Director Steve Piasecki reviewed the staff report VIa a
PowerPoint presentation.
Consultant Kirk Heinrichs answered a question from one of the agency members and said
that Redevelopment Agencies don't have a lot of revenue coming in and the City can
assist the agency in issuing bonds.
Chairwoman Kris Wang opened the public hearing at 9:50 p.m.
Darrel Lum said that this hearing should have received citywide notice and been held at a
more convenient time for the public to attend. He noted that the first implementation plan
wasn't included in the documentation and he wondered whether the RDA met its goals
and objectives. He asked if there was still a need for the RDA since Valleo was privately
financed and the redevelopment is nearing completion. He also asked what the 25%
dollar amount was that the RDA was required to give to the schools, and what the amount
would be if the RDA didn't exist. He noted some questionable dollar amounts from table
December 6, 2006
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 2
3 in the packet. He asked about a resolution that was passed in 2005 regarding the RDA's
intent to allocate 25% of it its discretionary funds to finance one of two parking
structures. He also asked if the RDA has plans for housing funds in addition to non-
housing funds, how would those bonds be raised, would it require a public vote or can the
RDA do it themselves. He wanted to know why the City was waiting to repay on a loan
that is due to be paid off in 2010, and what that loan was for.
Ruby Elbogen asked that if 25% of the RDA goes to low and very low housing, then
where in Valleo does the rest of the 75% go? She commented that the Council and staff
become so invested in potential income that they lose sight of the people, and that creates
confrontation with the constituents.
Tom Huginin said that he was concerned about floating a $10 million bond to support
Valleo because the City must use its own funds to back it up. He commented that Valleo
doesn't fit the definition of blight for a redevelopment agency and wondered if the RDA
was of any use in this situation. He suggested that improved mall management might
work better.
Jennifer Griffin wondered why the City established an RDA in 2000 with Valleo and why
there is housing in a shopping district. She said that an RDA doesn't help the City or the
residents.
Keith Murphy wondered if having the Council also be the RDA was good for the
community. He asked to whom the RDA was responsible and suggested getting more
community input.
Chairwoman Wang closed the public hearing.
Piasecki explained that the agency was established via a public process in 2000 to help
Valleo Fashion Park in the retail market place. The Council at that time felt a successful
Valleo was vital to the community. He noted that the hearing tonight was a 5-year
implementation plan only and that there would be a public process if the RDA decided to
issue bonds or follow through on any of the plan. Nothing in the document commits the
RDA or the Council to do anything in the future and the plan can be changed. He
suggested adding a Q&A page to the City's website to clarify what an RDA is.
Valleo representative Mike Rohde said that the RDA Implementation Plan is a good
document that would help in future times. He gave an update on the redevelopment
project at Valleo: the Macy's parking structure is open and the green screen installed; the
first level is open on the Penny's parking structure and the third level will open in a few
days; interior improvements are continuing inside the mall; the AMC theaters are
scheduled to open in March; Valleo is working with a leasing team in New York,
Chicago and Los Angeles to bring stores to the mall; Strike bowling and the food court
vendors are applying for permits; California Pizza Kitchen and Islands Restaurants are
submitting drawings to the City; external work on Sears is complete; and interior
improvements in Macy's will begin in February or March.
December 6, 2006
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 3
Kwok/Mahoney moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 06-02. The motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:41 p.m. the meeting was adjourned in memory of Lee Gottwald who passed away recently.
Please note that the regular Redevelopment Agency meetings of December 19 and January 2
have been canceled. The next regular meeting will be Tuesday, January 16, 2007.
~U1AJJ-
Grace Schmidt, Recording Secretary