Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CC 04-07-03
CITY O[ CUPERTINO AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Monday April 7, 2003 6:45 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamations for Deputies Post and Valdez for their rescue of Mrs. Eva Wasson and Able Construction Company for its assistance. 2. Presentation of plaque to Parks and Recreation Supervisor Tom Walters for his help with the Lunar New Year Unity Parade. 3. Proclamation for the Future Business Leaders of America. 4. Proclamation declaring April 7-13 as Library Week in Cupertino. POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. April 7, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 10. 11. Approve the minutes from the March 3, March 4 (two sets), March 17, and March 28 City Council meetings. Adopt resolutions accepting accounts payable for March 14, 21, and March 28 Resolution Nos. 03-056 through 03- 058. Adopt a resolution accepting the payroll for March 28, Resolution No. 03-059. Accept the Treasurer's Budget Report for February 2003. Accept an application for an Alcoholic Beverage License, Rib Crib Barbecue, 19930 Stevens Creek Blvd. Adopt a resolution approving the reallocation of a City Channel Program/Promotions Director position to Web Specialist, Resolution No. 03-060. Authorize fine arts grants for Spring 2003 as recommended by the Fine Arts Commission. i2. Accept Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant Allocation, Resolution No. 03- 061. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Accept California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) High Technology Grant Allocation, Resolution No. 03-062. Adopt a resolution setting the date of April 21 to approve the annexation of area designated "Dolores Avenue 02-04", property located on the south side of Dolores Avenue between Byme Avenue and Orange Avenue, approximately 0.21 acre, Hsu (APN 357-14-015), Resolution No. 03-063. Adopt a resolution making determinations and approving the annexation of area designated "Byme Avenue 02-08", property located on the west side of Byrne Avenue between Granada Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, approximately 0.41 acre, Perez (APN 357-11-005), Resolution No. 03-064. Adopt a resolution in support of clean fuel vehicles and participation in clean air programs, Resolution No. 03-065. Adopt a resolution for Grant of Easement, roadway, Mary Pesce King, Trustee of the 1995 Mary Pesce King Revocable Trust dated January 5, 1995, 10739 Santa Lucia Road, APN 342-17-036, Resolution No. 03-066. Adopt a resolution authorizing execution of a Joint Use Agreement for a trail between the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City of Cupertino for Regnart Creek, Resolution No.03-067. April 7, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 3 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 19. Extend the existing agreement with Apple Computer, Inc., for the disposal of electronic products and computers. 20. Declare intention to order the vacation of a portion of Madrid Road as provided in Section 8320 Et Seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California, fixing May 5 at 6:45 p.m., as the time and place for the public heating, Resolution No. 03-068. 21. Review bids and award contract for the De Anza Boulevard Corridor Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS), Project No. 420-9534. 22. Approve a second amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA). ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) PUBLIC HEARINGS 23. Consider adoption of the 2003-04 Fee Schedule, Resolution No. 03-069. PLANNING APPLICATIONS UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 24. Adopt policy for naming City facilities. 25. Authorize a revised public participation process for the General Plan review. 26. Receive report and consider adopting a City policy on responsible contracting, Resolution No. 03-070. 27. 28. Set a public heating for a General Plan amendment/zoning change on a portion of city property on Stevens Creek Boulevard, specifically the Blue Pheasant Restaurant and appurtenant parking, from General Plan designation: Public Park/Recreation to Planned Commercial or another zone as deemed appropriate by the City Council. Select dates: a) Study session on Vallco b) Study session(s) on the budget (between and including the dates of May 27th and 29th) c) Set a meeting with Supervisor Liz Kniss for May 5 at 5:30 p.m. to discuss issues in Cupertino April 7, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 4 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency ORDINANCES 29. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1916: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 11.08.270 Related to Skateboarding and Roller Skating at the Civic Center Plaza:" STAFF REPORTS 30. Receive a monthly status report on the Cupertino Civic Center and Library Project. COUNCIL REPORTS CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled for lack of business. IIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities, lf you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk's office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. CITY OF CUPERJINO ROLL CALL DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned meeting Monday March 3, 2003 At 5:00 p.m., Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in Conference Room A, Cupertino City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino. City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Patrick Kwok, Dolly Sandoval and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: none. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, City Attorney Charles Kilian, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. COMMISSION INTERVIEWS I. Interview applicants for unscheduled vacancies on the Planning and Fine Arts Commissions. Council interviewed David Kim and Fred Schualbach for the vacancy on the Fine Arts Commission, and appointed David Kim to a partial term ending January 2005. Council interviewed Seth Cohen, Michael Cellini, Hossein Amrbar, Shishir Mukherjee, Andrew Lamanque, Martin Miller, Tom Jacobs, Fenn Horton and Fred Schualback for a vacancy on the Planning Commission. Council held over this item until the end of the evening, at which time they appointed Martin Miller to a partial term ending January 2005. RECESS At 6:45 p.m.- 7:00 p.m. the Council was in recess. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 7:00 p.m. Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge o£Allegiance. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Patrick Kwok, Dolly Sandoval and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: none. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Public Works Director Ralph Qualls, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith, Associate Planner Peter Gilli, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 2. Proclamation for JC Penney's for their part in the Children's Shopping Spree. Jim Kegley accepted the proclamation on behalf of JC Pem~ey's. 2a. Proclamation for Colorectal Cancer Awareness month. Gay Crawford, Grace Tan, and Carol Baker accepted the proclamation. POSTPONEMENTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - documents were distributed for items 14 and 16. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue, said he understood that the City and County were working together to clean up the creeks. He asked what will happen to the golf course, which obtains its water from the creek, if existing small dams at Blackberry Farm are removed. CONSENT CALENDAR Lowenthal/Sandoval moved and seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as recommended, with the exception of item 12, which was discussed later with item No. 22. The motion carried. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. 3. 4. Approve the minutes from the February 11 and 18 City Council meetings. Adopt a resolution accepting Accounts Payable for February 14 and 21, Resolution Nos. 03-040 and 03-041. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for February 28, Resolution No. 03-042. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 3 Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $402.00 for the Homestead High School Music Boosters May 9, 2003, annual music awards banquet at the Quinlan Center. Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $628.00 for the Organization of Special Needs Families' March 23, 2003, first annual event recognizing the organization's achievements. Adopt a resolution accepting a Quitclaim deed for Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357-15-039, Resolution No. 03-043. Adopt a resolution accepting a Grant of easement, roadway, for Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants; 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357-15-039, Resolution No. 03-044. 10. Adopt a resolution accepting an Improvement agreement for Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357- 15-039, Resolution No. 03-045. 11. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for, accept, and appropriate $600,000 in FY 2003-04 funding from the State Bicycle Transportation Account for the Mary Avenue Footbridge Improvement Project, Resolution No. 03-046. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) The agenda was reordered to discuss item 12 and item 22 together. STAFF REPORTS 22. Receive a report on the Water Resources Ordinance sponsored by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (no documentation in packet); and 12. Watershed Protection Collaborative: a) Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a reimbursement agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District in the amount of $90,000 for the District to fund the efforts of the Watershed Protection Collaborative, Resolution No. 03-047 b) Adopt a resolution authorizing the Director of Public Works to negotiate and execute an agreement in an amount not to exceed $90,000 for with CONCUR, Inc. for the administration of the Watershed Protection Collaborative, on condition of approval of the reimbursement agreement by the City and Santa Clara Valley Water District, Resolution No. 03-048. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 4 Public Works Director Ralph Qualls gave a verbal report, and said that local cities, the County of Santa Clara, and some business districts had formed a collaborative group and had tentatively arranged for a facilitator. There have been two meetings already, and will be five more by July. The City will administer the contract and be reimbursed by the Water District. Kwok/Lowenthal moved and seconded to receive the report, and adopt Resolution Nos. 03-047 and 03-048. The motion carried. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. NEW BUSINESS The agenda was reordered to consider item 16 next. 16. Receive a report on Labor Compliance Provisions for Construction Contracts and approval of Rex~ised Special Provisions for Certified Payrolls and Prevailing Wage Requirements for the Civic Center and Library Phase II Construction Project. Public Works Director Ralph Qualls reviewed the staff report and explained that project labor agreements (PLA) are an agreement between the construction trade unions, the individual unions who are employed on the project, and the project owner, in order to establish a dispute procedure before hand with working rules and conditions. Neil Strothers, 2102 Almaden Rd., Ste. 101, Building Trades Council, disagreed with some items in the staff report, in particular the estimated cost and 6-month extension for pre-qualification. He clarified that the Building Trades Council has not asked for a PLA and that it wouldn't meet their criteria. He said the City has an opportunity to define what responsible contracting means and he would welcome a conversation on what the City;s options are. The following individuals spoke in favor of the staff recommendation and were opposed to project labor agreenements. Their comments included concern about delays in construction projects, lessening of competition, dissipation of fund-raising efforts by service clubs, higher construction costs, sending local tax dollars out of the area, impacting locally qualified construction companies, and discrimination against state- approved apprenticeship programs. · Eric Christen, 3131 52nd Ave., Sacramento, Executive Director for the Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction · Joseph C. Gamb, 104 Lavonne Dr., Campbell, All Bay Electric · Dave Sztuk, 525 Asbury St., San Jose, a local contractor · Mark Bums, 1085 Huntington Dr., San Jose, representing the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce · Kevin Dayton, 11875 Dublin Blvd., Ste. C-258, Associated Builders and Contractors, Golden Gate Chapter. · Rich Abdalah, 10455 Torre Ave., an employee of the County of Santa Clara. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 5 · Elinora Mantovani, 11238 Bubb Rd., was opposed to a PLA. · Chuck Con', 11094 La Paloma. S andoval said she was not in favor of the staff recommendation requiring that contractors provide certified payrolls because it would be an unnecessary, burdensome, and costly expenditure for the City. She suggested the City react locally on a complaint basis by having an independent fact-finder involved in the event of a formal complaint, with the losing party paying the costs. She distributed a draft policy that she asked Council to consider at the March ! 7 meeting. Sandoval/Kwok moved to accept the staff report, excluding the requirement for every contractor to submit certified payrolls. Lowenthal/James moved to add a friendly amendment, which was accepted, to note and file the staff report and to take no action at this time. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. Sandoval/Kwok moved to have staff review and give an interim report from the Public Works Director on March 17 regarding Sandoval's proposed policy on responsible contracting. The motion carried. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Hold a public hearing on the 2002-03 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood introduced the item. The public hearing was opened. There were no speakers, and the heating was closed at 8:31 p.m. Council received the report. 14. Consider Application Nos. GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, and EA-2002-01, City of Cupertino, Citywide; an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and any other elements affected by the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, and an amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to incorporate the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. A Negative Declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Senior Planner Aarti Shrivastava reviewed the staff report via a PowerPoint presentation. She listed major concerns and positive comments determined by the survey results The public hearing was opened and the following individuals commented on the Crossroads plan: · Leslie Ericksen, 10298 Cold Harbor Ave. · SteveTong, 10321 Bret Ave. · Joanne Tong, 22339 McClellan Rd. · Mark Bums, 21269 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino Chamber of Commerce · Preston Chiappa, 10329 Brittany Ct. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 6 · Letter from Dave Hauser, owner of McWhorter and Young, 20558 Stevens Creek Blvd. · "Ned" Britt, 20850 Peppertree Lane · E.J. Conens, 10480Pineville · Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Ave. · Geoffrey Paulsen, 10557 Randy Lane · Mark Peebles, 10166 Barbara Lane · Patricia Smith, 10317 Cold Harbor Ave. · Dermis Whittaker, 20622 Cheryl Dr. · Penny Whittaker, 20622 Cheryl Dr. · Bob Hendrickson, 10535 Mira Vista Ave. · Charles Taubman, 20658 Shelly Dr. · Kenneth W. Race, 906 Liberty Ct. · Homer Tong, 22339 McClellan Rd. · MalkaNagel, 1010 Camino Vista Their comments included: · The Crossroads plan would take away the small-town feel of Cupertino · Limit buildings to two stories and maximize setbacks from the street · Do not reduce the number of lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd. (staff clarified that there was no current recommendation to reduce lanes) · Delay the Bottegas project until there is continuity with the whole Crossroads plan · Obtain more public input before moving forward with the plan, including multi- lingual focus groups · Merchants were not surveyed for their input · The survey for the residents, businesses, property owners, memhants, and · The plan appears to favor new retailers and old businesses will be impacted by loss of visibility and business disruption · The plan is good, but Stevens Creek is not the place to build it · A parking garage would be needed · Consider needs of the handicapped and people with strollers so that sidewalks are of sufficient size · Don't tie multi-culturalism into the development · Sidewalk widths are inconsistent. The public hearing was closed. James/Kwok moved and seconded to vote for option B from the staff report, to delay the schedule for the Crossroads Plan and evaluate it as part of the General Plan. The motion carried. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok. Noes: Sandoval and Lowenthal. Absent: None. The agenda was reordered to discuss item 17 next. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 7 17. 15. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1914: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.24.170 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Parking Limitation on Certain Streets, Establishing a 30-Minute Limited Parking Zone on Bonny Drive, Scofield Drive, and Pepper Tree Lane, in the Vicinity of Faria School." Public Works Director Ralph Qualls reviewed the staff report. Sharon Kohlmannslehner, 20416 Via Volante, President of the Faria School Site Council, said that after the pilot project, a 15% decrease in traffic in the morning and a third decrease in the afternoon was seen, and she was encouraged that this would continue. She showed a box of about 400 letters from the Faria school parents encouraging support for the project. Suresh Kadiyala, 21103 Granola Dr., Faria School Site Council, said that the project was very successful and supported the ordinance to make the parking arrangement permanent. He commented that the families pledged to support the parking rules in the Faria neighborhood. Dolly Travers, 10155 Barbara Lane, Principal of Faria School, said that the Site Council would continue to take responsibility to send regular reminders and to listen to the neighbors. She requested permanent status of the parking project. Ned Britt, 20850 Pepper Tree Lane, said that he has seen at least 6 cars block the crosswalk area and a continual congestion of cars. He said that the actual problem is not the cars that are parked, but the ones that are driving. He thought that the traffic pattern should be changed to make people park a block or two away and keep cars from driving through, so that parents would feel safe to allow their children to cross in the crosswalk. Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Ave., said that the congestion problem started when school busing ended. The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereofi The motion carried. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval, Lowenthal. Noes: None. Absent: None. Consider Application Nos. MCA-2002-03 and EA-2002-10, City of Cupertino, Citywide; a Municipal Code amendment to Chapter 19.28 and related chapters affecting single- fmnily residential development in the R1 zoning district. A Negative Declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Ordinance No. 1915: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, Amending Chapters 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 and 14.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Single- Family Residential Development Regulations." March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 8 Associate Planner Peter Gilli reviewed the staffreport via a PowerPoint presentation. The public hearing was opened and the following individuals spoke: · Mark Bums, 345 S. San Antonio Rd., Silicon Valley Association of Realtors · MartyMiller, 20348 Clay St. · Natalie Cardenas, 345 S. San Antonio Rd., Silicon Valley Association of Realtors · Leslie Bumell, 21466 Holly Oak Dr. · CaryChien, 10583 Felton Way · Zhaorong Xia, 20903 Hanford Drive · Malka Nagel, 10180 Camino Vista · Jan Stoeckenius, 22386 Cupertino Road · Lisa Giefer, 21561 Regnart Road · Robert Chang, 10846 Willowbrook Way Their comments included: · The original purpose of the ordinance was to eliminate oversized homes and it has served its purpose · The ordinance also served to reduce the pace of redevelopment and infill development in residential neighborhoods, which isn't good · Some review and updating to the ordinance is in order in terms of what to achieve in moving forward · The R-1 ordinance amendment added many stumbling blocks to homeowners and builders · Delays and additional requirements cost homeowners more money and the existing ordinance is more than adequate · The proposed changes of the process of design review are not minor, but significant · The realtor community would like a chance to work with Council and staff to provide valuable input · Any delay could add weeks or months to the process and more money for the homeowner, which might force them to not be able to build or have to move out of the area · Concern about privacy for lower-level homes when a 2-story is built · The ordinance lengthens the process and makes the project more expensive · Things should stay the way they are and the item should be tabled · Concern about a more restrictive ordinance and its interpretation · The restriction of the 2nd floor area wasn't doing the job it was supposed to do in building smaller homes since people will just build the first floor bigger · Encourage staff to use design review to help maintain privacy when neighbors build 2-story homes James/Kwok moved to take the item off the calendar and to re-notice it. It will come back for Council consideration as two to three separate ordinances dealing with various issues raised at the meeting, including process, prescriptive, and noticing. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 9 17. PLANNING APPLICATIONS UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 16. Receive a report on Labor Compliance Provisions for Construction Contracts and approval of Revised Special Provisions for Certified Payrolls and Prevailing Wage Requirements for the Civic Center and Library Phase II Construction Project. This item was heard earlier in the evening Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1914: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.24.170 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Parking Limitation on Certain Streets, Establishing a 30-Minute Limited Parking Zone on Bonny Drive, Scofield Drive, and Pepper Tree Lane, in the Vicinity of Faria School." This item was heard earlier in the evening. 18. Discuss how hillside exceptions for residential development are reviewed and approved. This item was continued to the meeting of March 4, 2003. 19. Review the proposed housing assistance program for Cupertino teachers. This item was continued to the meeting of March 4, 2003. ORDINANCES 20. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1912: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 2.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding the Disaster Council." This item was continued to the meeting of March 4, 2003. 21. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1913: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Sections 2.88.010 of the City's Ordinance Code Modifying the Composition of the Audit Committee." This item was continued to the meeting of March 4, 2003. COUNCIL REPORTS - None CLOSED SESSION - None q-lq March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 10 ADJOURNMENT At I2:40 a.m. Council adjourned to Tuesday, March 4, for a joint study session with the Planning Commission regarding the preliminary review of the proposed General Plan update, and to take up the items that were continued from this agenda. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino. Council also announced that they would hold an emergency meeting on Wednesday, March 5, at 5:00 p.m. to discuss a possible insurance issue regarding the Lunar New Year Unity Parade. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk For more infon,nation: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. CITYOF CUPERTINO DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 4, 2003 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 5:12 p.m. Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLLCALL City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Patrick Kwok, Dolly Sandoval and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: none. Planning Commission members present: Chairperson Angela Chen and Planning Commissioners Charles Corr, Marty Miller, Taghi Saadati, and Gilbert Wong. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood (6:40 p.m.), City Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, City Planner Cynthia Wordell, Senior Planner Vera Gil, Associate Planner Peter Gilli, Public Works Director Ralph Qualls, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None STUDY SESSION 1. Joint study session of City Council and Planning Commission to discuss the administrative draft of the General Plan Community Development Director Steve Piasecki said this was the second of two study sessions. He distributed additional materials that were requested at the last meeting (staff report dated March 4, 2003). City Planner Cynthia Wordell said staff is looking for input on any parameters Council wished to change, and to develop the parameters for the Draft Plan to frame subsequent public discussion. She said that issues regarding school impacts would be discussed at a separate time. March 4, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 Wordell explained a chart titled Development Potential, Committed Development (Exhibit C in staff report), which showed information about commercial areas, office areas, hotel rooms, and residential units. She also highlighted information in the staff report about housing allocations, and street framing, and building heights. Outside Growth Parameters Discussion was held on the outside growth parameters stated in the draft Plan and whether they were appropriately framed for public discussion. Piasecki said that Council could hold the existing affordable housing numbers as a maximum, but they may wish to lower the number. He said that the commercial portion of this draft General Plan is a slow to moderate growth plan, and for housing, it is a moderate to aggressive growth plan. James noted that in addition to the need for affordable housing, people are also concerned about density and growth. She believed a mix of housing types would be necessary, but the community did not want tall buildings or high density. Also, the plan should be changed so that building height limitations included machinery on rooftops. Sandoval agreed, and said that people are also concerned about impacts on schools and access to basic services such as local grocery stores. The plan needs to take a broader view. Discussion followed about limiting the amount of development to be allowed; and it was agreed that a series of columns could be added to the Development Potential chart so that a range of development could be chosen which would illustrate the impacts of low, medium, and aggressive growth. It was also agreed that there should be some maximum limit on the number of 60-foot or higher buildings, including those at the City Center, Vallco, and Apple Computers. The Crossroads Plan should be limited to a 45-foot height. Lowenthal suggested an overlay on the maximum building heights map. It could show where the existing buildings are and indicate possible locations for future tall buildings. Discussion followed regarding the impacts of growth on the schools, and that it was important to have the information available for the community meetings on the General Plan. Staff was asked to prepare a map showing where the preponderance of residential housing is and which schools would be most affected. Share the Road Bob Harrison, traffic consultant, explained Levels of Service (LOS) at intersections, both existing and potential. He said the LOS at some important intersections had improved in Cupertino over the last few years and most anticipated changes could be accommodated on the local street system. The plan says that Level D is the worst that can be accepted. Some intersections are projected to reach Level E, so for those it may be necessary to add March 4, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 3 a lane or make other adjustments. He explained that the analysis of peak morning hours captured the morning school traffic, but not the mid-afternoon school traffic. The analysis is done only on major arterials, and does not address the intersections close to the schools. In school areas, it is important to stagger start times, begin busing, or make other functional changes rather than widen streets. Council members suggested the following: · Consider amending the plan to require a study on school traffic on a case-by-case basis · Conduct a Council/school district joint meeting to address traffic problems around schools and discuss possible policy changes · Consider regional impacts on the schools as a result of development of neighboring cities · Interest in lowering LOS to benefit bicyclists and pedestrians · Will lowering LOS on arterials be a safety issue · Development alternatives to create potential for non-auto trips · Promote sharing parking lots, ridesharing opportunities · Aggregate parking and walkability · LOS analysis of pedestrian and bicycle impacts · Target heavily impacted areas (like those near the college) · Identify and promote walkable zones - remove impediments such as vegetation, provide parking, and places to walk to · Walkability should be in targeted zones (trails) · Walkability is not always feasible/desirable in private developments · Create a comprehensive community plan to determine linkages at the city level · Pay attention to safety - walkability areas must be compatible with cars Sustainable Community Plaiming consultant Leon Pirofalo, Planning Resource Associates, led the discussion on sustainable community, which included encouraging the use of alternative energy sources, staff and public education training, increased recycling, and green buildings. He said that 10-12 other cities have adopted the "smart growth" strategy as described in the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) document Smart Growth Strategy. He said that sustainable community could revitalize older suburbs, support public transit, support open space, and create more livable communities with sufficient housing for work force. Council members suggested the following: · Address alternatives to pesticide use · Address increasing cost of energy and need for energy-efficient "green" buildings · In the section on education, incorporate information on grants and cost savings · Strong support for recycling programs · Preservation of natural resources March 4, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 4 Staff was asked to renew the computer recycling program agreement and to get information about policies already in place in neighboring cities. Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith reviewed the section of the plan about parks acquisition, including total acreage, distribution of parklands, and use of the acreage. Past policyhas been to provide 3 acres of open space per person. She described the joint powers agreement for 30 acres of Cupertino Union School District athletic fields, which runs through the year 2016, as well as the 43.1 acres composed of Blackberry Farm, the Simms property, and the Stocklmeier property. Smith also reviewed a chart that illustrated park and open space acreage acquisition by area. Council agreed that they liked the suggestions in the staff report, and also offered the following comments: · Create guidelines/standards for park aesthetics · Offer more variety in park style and park uses · Address the need for parking at parks, particularly Rancho San Antonio · Use Proposition 40 money for acquisition · Provide a skate park At this time, the public was invited to speak. Ned Britt, 20850 Pepper Tree Lane, discussed sustainability. He said that increases in density and traffic could only make the problem worse. Also, there will be increasing pressure on the schools from people moving into the community, and as a result of ABAG policies. He urged Council to resist that pressure. Shishir Mukherjee, 1174 Scotland Drive, said the draft plan doesn't have sufficient flexibility. He suggested several planning scenarios so that citizens can choose what they like, such as low growth. He added that Level of Service E is not acceptable. Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue, said that many residents do not have bicycles or cars, and the plan does not address their needs. The Transportation Authority is of limited help because a large part of the city has no bus service. He said that neighboring cities have aimost as much impact on traffic in the city as Cupertino does. Mark Burns, President of the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, said it is important to consider Level of Service changes and how they would affect access to shops for drivers and for the handicapped. He suggested further research on the viability of mixed-use developments in the Bay area because they often prove to be mediocre in the long run. Burns suggested that the City should try to identify why parents feel the need to drive children to school. Joanne Tong, 22339 McClellan Road, objected to Council's remark that there were no representatives from school districts and colleges at this study session, and asked if they had been invited to give input. March 4, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 5 Dennis Whittaker, 20622 Cheryl Drive, discussed walkability and urged that planners keep in mind the needs of blind pedestrians. He asked why the plan did not address the feasibility of light rail, and whether the City was planning for the potential of a 7-year drought. He noted that there were fewer gas stations in the City, and if there are future oil crises there may be long lines at the remaining stations. He said there was a need for a local toxic waste disposal facility. He suggested that the City attempt to annex the portion of San Jose from Bollinger, Lawrence, Prospect and DeAnza, and the old Bonsai Nursery could become a youth center. Rich Parker, 21587 Flintshine Street, said that word isn't getting out to the neighborhoods as to where to find the General Plan. He said he was not willing to sacrifice automobile access and thought the current level of traffic was acceptable, except around schools. He said Stevens Creek Trail was an appropriate place to promote walkability. Malca Nagel, resident of Camino Vista Avenue, said her concerns involved the affect of new housing on schools. She said that there is a waiting list at some elementary schools, and realty offices must disclose that they cannot guarantee a homeowner's child will be able to go to school in the neighborhood. She asked if a traffic light had been planned for Saich at the time that Whole Foods Market was built. She spoke about walkability in private development and said in some neighborhoods it's inappropriate to install sidewalks. Lisa Giefer, 21561 Regnart Road, was in support of sustainable development. She did not think bike lanes were appropriate on major streets. Ciddy Wordell said the next step would be a community meeting in April at the Quinlan Community Center, followed by the release of the draft General Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Public hearings will be held in the summer before the Planning Commission and City Council. ADJOURNMENT At 6:15 p.m., Council adjourned. The Planning Commission adjourned to March 10 at 5:00 p.m. for a study session with the City Manager to discuss how the commissions were working. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.om. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned Meeting Tuesday, March 4, 2003 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:16 p.m. Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Patrick Kwok, Dolly Sandoval and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: none. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, City Planner Cynthia Wordell, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None NEW BUSINESS These items were continued from the previous evening: 1. Discuss how hillside exceptions for residential development are reviewed and approved. City Planner Cynthia Wordell reviewed a series of PowerPoint slides illustrating the hillside exception process. She said that the exceptions are required if the property has prominent ridgelines, geologic hazards, or if there is a need to reduce visible mass, address steep slopes, and avoid land disturbance. In the last five years, there have been eleven hillside exceptions, most of which were in Inspiration Heights. Exceptions are final with the Planning Commission unless appealed to the City Council. Council directed staff to identify the process as a design review process instead of an exception process. 2. Review the proposed housing assistance program for Cupertino teachers. Community Development Director Steve Piasecki said the City is recommending the same basic plan as that in San Jose. Up to four loans per year would be provided for full- March 4, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 time credentialed teacher employed by the Cupertino Unison School District (CUSD)/ Foothill Union School District (FUHSD) or De Anza College. The maximum loan would be $50,000, and homes must be within a one-mile radius of Cupertino. James felt that loans should only be for property within the City limits, since Cupertino taxpayers are funding the program and most neighboring cities have their housing assistance programs. Sandoval and Kwok agreed. Sandoval asked for more information about the time line and the process of notification and selection. James noted that although a CUSD representative was not here at this time, Andy Mortenson from CUSD attended yesterday's Council meeting. James asked that the Public Information Officer prepare a press release on the housing assistance program for teachers. Council concurred to refer the item to the Housing Commission to evaluate the process and report back to Council, and requested removal of the policy that allowed loans on houses outside City limits. ORDINANCES Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1912: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 2.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding the Disaster Council." James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1912. Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1913: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Sections 2.88.010 of the City's Ordinance Code Modifying the Composition of the Audit Committee." Sandoval/Lowenthal moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. Sandoval/Lowenthal moved and seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1913. Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 POSTPONEMENTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Penny Whittaker, 20622 Cheryl Drive, said that at the General Plan study session on March 4, public comments were restricted to the second part of the meeting and they did not have an opportunity to talk about housing and building heights. Ms. Whittaker talked about the ABAG (Association of Bay Area Governments) housing requirements, asked why the additional units were needed, what would be the consequences of not meeting ABAG requirements, and how could citizens give input to ABAG. Sandra James responded and explained that the worst case would be the City could lose its rights to issue permits at a local level. She noted that the City did challenge the ABAG numbers recently and they had been substantially reduced as a result. Dennis Whittaker, 20622 Cheryl Drive, said he hoped that Council had seen the videos he provided of the community meeting. He referred to the last General Plan study session, which had been advertised as an opportunity for community input. He understood the reason for the most recent meeting (the meeting went until after midnight) but asked that Council give the residents an opportunity to participate and be heard. He said that the General Plan should be developed with a vision, and the bottom line issue for citizens is to have growth the right way. He felt that Cupertino should retain its own character and maintain the high quality of education. One area not addressed as thoroughly as it could be is cooperation between DeAnza College and the City. Mr. Whittaker felt that housing was needed more for the City's service workers, not college students, because DeAnza is a regional college. Andrew Patti, 21853 Monte Court, and Brian Franklin, 21885 Garden View Lane, talked about the current law that requires sidewalks to be placed in front of a home during renovation, and requested an exception process. Public Works Director Ralph Qualls said there is a provision in the proposed General Plan update that would provide area-by-area exceptions for more rural areas, and in some cases the Cty can accept a bond in lieu of sidewalk. If the Council approves the new process, neighborhoods can apply for a special exception in that district and the bond can be refunded to them. E. J. Conens, 10480 Pineville Avenue, asked for Council to adopt a resolution in support of the military, and support our military people. The Council members expressed their support for the U.S. military, and explained that Council has a policy of not adopting resolutions unless they are of local significance. Yao Shing Schuan, 21441 Elm Court, spoke regarding a flooding problem in the past, and expressed appreciation for previous help. He asked about engineering studies and plans to prevent future flooding on Elm Court. He said that most of the problem seems to be manhole overflow and floodwaters from Bubb Road and suggested that Bubb Road be leveled upstream and downstream. March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 3 CONSENTCALENDAR Lowenthal moved and seconded to approve items 3-8 on the Consent Calendar as recommended. Item 9 was deferred until after item 14, and items 10 and 10a which were pulled for discussion. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. 3. Approve the minutes from the March 5 City Council meeting. Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Payable for February 28 and March 7, Resolution Nos. 03-049 and 03-050. 5. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for March 14, Resolution No. 03-051. Accept the Treasurer's Budget Report - January 2003. (Attachments to the Treasurer's Report were distributed at the meeting). Improvement agreement, Republic Properties, 22551, 22561, 22571, and 22581 Ricardo Road, APNs 356-01-051,052, 053, and 054, Resolution No. 03-052. Adopt a resolution setting the date to approve the annexation of area designated "Byrne Avenue 02-08", property located on the west side of Byme Avenue between Granada Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, approximately 0.41 acre, Perez (APN 357-I1-005), Resolution No. 03-053. (Draft resolution No. 03-053 was distributed at the meeting). ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) 10. Approve a fee waiver request in the amount of $1,305.00 for the Lunar New Year Unity Parade Committee's use of various city sites for their March 8, 2003, first annual event. Kwok/Sandoval moved and seconded to approve the fee waiver request, Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. 10a. Make appointments to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Steering Committee. Kwok/James moved and seconded to appoint Don Burnett, Mary Ellen Chell, Dick Schuster, and Marsha Brewer for a one-year term to the CDBG Steering Committee as recommended by staff. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 11. Consider abating a public nuisance (overgrown foliage which obstructs the street and sidewalk) at 7535 Normandy Lane, APN 366-11-151,William and Elena Kettler property owners, Resolution 03-054. March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 4 The City Clerk announced that the property owner has abated the nuisance. Mayor Chang opened the public heating at 7:37 p.m. There were no speakers and the hearing was closed. James/Kwok moved and seconded to remove this item from the calendar. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood said that staff will bring to Council a proposed ordinance to bill residents for City costs leading up to the abatement of re- occurring nuisances. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 12. Application Nos. U-2002-11 and EA-2002-23; Use Permit to allow the demolition a 7,744 square foot restaurant (former Santa Barbara Grill) and construct a 120-room hotel (Extended Stay America), located at 10745 N. De Anza Boulevard. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended and this item is recommended for approval. Elevations from the Design Review Board Re-Submittal were distributed at the meeting. Senior Planner Aarti Sl~rivastava gave a PowerPoint presentation that included information on parking, landscaping, and transient occupancy tax. Applicant J. R. Rodin representing Extended Stay America, said he was concerned about the 29-day limitation for guests, and asked for clarification of that condition or a mechanism to allow guests check out and immediately re-register, so that they will not be forced to move around. Rodin said the hotel would probably open in late 2004 and the company plans to move ahead with development at this time. Steve Peters, the Bay area corporate real estate manager, explained that the hotel caters to corporate travelers who are in town 2-3 weeks at a time. He said that there had been a lot of support for this service expressed by local businesses during their research. Kevin Chow, architect, gave a PowerPoint presentation on design concepts, landscaping, the public plaza with artwork, floor plan, and building materials. He said that parking was adequate and more than exceeds the minimum standards. There is no cocktail lounge or restaurant, and a shuttle service will be used instead of the hotel having a permanent shuttle. Chang was concerned about the layout of the building and the size of the structure as a first impression for drivers entering Cupertino. The architect said that the layout was designed to preserve the large oak tree on the property. Kwok was also concerned about the four levels of building providing a large mass for drivers exiting the freeway. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the construction of a new hotel. Their comments included: the market changes, especially since the September 11 attack, have had an adverse impact on the hotel industry, and the market is reaching a saturation point March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 5 in Cupertino. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is important for the community, but adding hotels does not increase the number of guests in town, so the hotels compete for guests by lowering their rates, which lowers the TOT. The existing hotels are struggling and employees are losing their jobs. Salaried staff at the Cupertino Inn has already taken a large reduction in pay, and existing clients are reporting that they are continuing to cut back on travel. Barbara Perzigian, General Manager, Cupertino Inn, 10889 N. DeAnza Boulevard Christian Olsen, Marketing Manager, Cupertino Inn Bryan Adame, Cupertino Inn employee Leann Hall, Assistant General Manager, Cupertino Inn Sheila Leimer, Director of Sales, Cupertino Inn Aaron Douehinski, Reservatibns Manager, Cupertino Inn Brandie Rivera, Sales Manager, Cupertino Inn Derrick Douchinski, Front Office Manager, Cupertino Inn Steve Peters said that he was empathetic to the problem and that hotels all over the area are experiencing a drop in business. Historically this is a cyclical business, and their research shows that although demand will remain flat in 2003, it will increase in late 2004 to 2005. The Extended Stay America is in a different price point than the Inn and offers a different product. Lowenthal said he generally supported competition but was persuaded that Cupertino doesn't need more hotel rooms. He thinks recovery will be a long-term process, and current businesses should be successful, if not thriving. Also, the building is large and not particularly beautiful, and the community has expressed its desire to pull back on growth. This is an opportunity to pull back on a 4-story building that is not needed. Kwok felt it was important that current businesses are successful, and he was not in favor of a four-story structure right next to the freeway. He suggested this project be delayed for a year or two. James said it was interesting that the other hotels did not come here to discourage the project. She said it was not Council's role to limit competition or free enterprise. The applicant has been working with staff for nearly a year, and was never told the City was running out of space for hotel rooms. Also, some of the bigger companies in town are sending people to Saratoga or San Jose because of better marketing of hotel rooms and long-term deals. Extended Stay America is a different market niche than the Cupertino hm. She thought the exterior design had been approved since the first submittal, and she had no objection to the height, since it was the same height or lower than other businesses on the same street. Sandoval agreed with James' comments about a free market and encouraging enterprise, and that the City's hotels ail serve different niches. March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 6 Chang said he had concerns regarding the design as well as timing. He would have preferred more choices, with less height and mass next to freeway, particularly for this gateway building. He recommended it be sent back to the Planning Commission to work on design issues, and have it come back to Council in 9 months or a year. Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood said the Environmental Review Committee discussed this matter and felt it was not the city's job to limit competition. They believed that this is a regional issue, and neighboring cities will continue to grow and build hotels even if Cupertino doesn't. When the recession is over, that business will go elsewhere. Also, the developer has the expertise to determine if it is appropriate to build now, and it would provide jobs over the next 18 months. James/Sandoval moved and seconded to approve the proposal. Motion failed and the project was not approved. AYES: James and Sandoval. NOES: Chang, Kwok, and Lowenthal. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS 13. Adopt a resolution supporting the creation of a National Housing Trust Fund, Resolution No. 03-055. 14. Barry Del Buno, CEO and president of the Emergency Housing Consortium, said that lack of affordable housing threatens the City's economic well-being. He asked for Council's support of the National Housing Trust Fund. Ron Johnson, Vice-President of the Affordable Housing Network of Santa Clara County, also spoke in support of the National Housing Trust Fund. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 03-055. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. Discuss midyear budget amendments and policy review: a) b) c) d) Mobile skate park schedule Fee waiver policy direction Fourth of July policy direction Adopt midyear budget amendments Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood gave a PowerPoint presentation and discussed previous actions that had been taken, such as reviewing internal policies and funding an additional year-end shortfall with the Economic Uncertainty Reserve. She reviewed plans for 2003/2004, which included reducing the Operations budget by $1 million, reducing the Capital Improvement Projects budget by $1 million, and reducing March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 7 the Economic Uncertainty budget by $1 million. Atwood also reviewed the proposed mid-year budget amendments. Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith reviewed proposed changes to the mobile skate park schedule, changes in the facility rental fee waiver policy, and changes in the Fourth of July event, which cannot be held at DeAnza College this year because of construction on campus. Sharon Blaine, DeAnza Circle, said she was a member of the Cupertino Historical Society, and it would be unable to pay the $40-$50/night fees for their meetings to continue at the Quinlan Center. Barbara Rogers explained that because Cupertino Community Services and the Historical Society are housed in that building, they can continue to use the facility without charge. James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to approve the recommendations shown in the staff report, with the following exceptions: (1) They will not fund the fountain repair at the Quinlan Center; (2) They will keep the fireworks display; (3) They will not change subsidies for festivals; and (4) They will no longer give waivers for fees. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to allow fee waivers through June 30, and not thereafter. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR - continued Approve a fee waiver request in the amount of $120.00 for the Santa Clara County Chapter of the California Grand Jurors' Association's educational classes given at the Quinlan Center monthly from April through September 2003. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to grant a partial fee waiver from April 2003 through June 30, 2003. Thereafter fee waivers will not be granted for rooms. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. NEW BUSINESS - continued 15. Consider naming opportunities offered in conjunction with the Library/Civic Center fundraising efforts and authorize the Cupertino Library Campaign Committee to seek contributions based on an approved list. Barbara Rogers, Chair of the Cupertino Library Foundation Committee, asked that the Council first discuss and decide only the existing list of naming opportunities before taking up any other discussion on this category. She also asked that Council not adopt the word "authorize" as recommended in the staff report, but to retain the word "confirm" March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 8 because it is important that the Library Campaign Committee retain some autonomy in the fund-raising effort. If Council decides not to confirm one or more of their decisions, then that particular naming opportunity would not be pursued. The co-vice chairmen are Council members Michael Chang and Richard Lowenthal, and she would make regular reports to the City Council, so they will be kept informed of any activity. Consultant Mary Rose Delgadillo said that she had felt overwhelmed by the level of community support for the foundation. However, it is important that the committee have the list finalized since it is a critical tool in their fund-raising effort. Pat Rogers, President of the Cupertino Library Campaign Committee, agreed with Barbara Roger's request to have a finalized list, and their preference to keep the wording so that the Council "confirms" the Foundation's decision instead of "authorizing" it. If Council objects to a particular funding opportunity, then they would not confirm that decision and it wouldn't happen. Dennis Whittaker, 20622 Cheryl Drive, said he had some concerns about naming parts of buildings. If that decision is made, it should be made after someone who has made a contribution to the community, and not someone who just purchased the opportunity to name the building. Sharon Blaine, DeAnza Circle, felt that naming rooms and lobbies, etc., was a clever way to raise money. She noted that this city has a tradition of naming schools after people who donated the land. Michael Chang explained that the proposal is to name the structure, but the building will still be known as the Cupertino Community Hall, for example, and an individual will have a plaque acknowledging the financial support. Sm~dra James said she felt strongly that the building itself is a public building paid for by the taxpayers, and it should not have an individual's name. She saw no problem with naming the interior of the building, the fountain, separate rooms, etc. She said the community hall and the library should not be for sale. However, if that was the Council's decision, then a process should be developed which would allow participation by the entire community. Lowenthal/Sandoval moved and seconded to (1) Confirm a new naming opportunities list as shown below, excluding the Community Hall Building; (2) To authorize the Library Foundation Committee to solicit funding; (3) That the dollar amounts shall be left to the discretion of the committee; (4) That acceptable names shall be those of individuals, families and service organizations connected with Cupertino; and (5) That there is no need for confirmation of individual names by City Council. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 9 Naming Item · Courtyard · Children's Room · Adult Nonfiction Area · Children's Story Room · Adult New Materials/Media · Adult International Languages Area · Library Outdoor Sculpture · Teen Area · Adult Fiction Area · Lobby · Adult Reference Area · Computer Training Area · California Western Americana Area · Children's Picture Book Area · New Magazine's Display Area · Children's Group study area · Teen Group Study Area · Adult Quiet Study Area · Grand Stair · Express Self-Check Machines · Business Resources Area · Adult Seating Overlooking Plaza · Children's Tutor Study Room · [Community Hall] Lobby · Dais · North and South Terraces (2) · Conference Room · Plaza Water Fountains · Covered Arcade · Plaza Garden Areas (4) · Stone Benches in Plaza (4) Consultant Mary Rose Delgadillo and Public Works Director Ralph discussed naming policies used in other communities. Jmnes/Lowenthal moved and seconded to continue this item to the next regular council meeting for the purpose of allowing public input regarding the naming of public buildings. The motion failed to carry by the following vote: Vote: Ayes: James and Lowenthal. Noes: Sandoval, Chang, and Kwok. Absent: None. 2"/ March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 10 Sandoval/Kwok moved and seconded that Council add the community hall building back to the list of facilities for which the library foundation can solicit funding, and specify language for identification plaques. Sample wording is shown below: JANE DOE COMMUNITY BUILDING iN RECOGNITION OF A MAJOR CONTRIBUTION BY THE DOE FAMILY TO THE CUPERTINO COMMUNITY HALL. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Chang, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: James. None. Absent: None. Jmnes asked that the record reflect that she was extremely disappointed that the Council did not choose to wait two weeks to allow community input regarding selling rights to name the building, and instead chose to make this important decision at a quarter to twelve tonight. The final approved list of naming items is as follows: Naming Item · Courtyard · Children's Room · Adult Nonfiction Area · Children's Story Room · Adult New Materials/Media · Adult International Languages Area · Library Outdoor Sculpture · Teen Area · Adult Fiction Area · Lobby · Adult Reference Area · Computer Training Area · California Western Americana Area · Children's Picture Book Area · New Magazine's Display Area · Children's Group study area · Teen Group Study Area · Adult Quiet Study Area · Grand Stair · Express Self-Check Machines · Business Resources Area · Adult Seating Overlooking Plaza · Children's Tutor Study Room March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page · [Community Hall] Lobby · Lobby · Dais · North and South Terraces (2) · Conference Room · Plaza Water Fountains · Covered Arcade · Plaza Garden Areas (4) · Stone Benches in Plaza (4) Sandoval moved that Council discuss the naming of the library structure at a subsequent meeting when staff has had an opportunity to develop a policy. James seconded and offered a friendly amendment to add the words "to allow ample time for community notice and input." Sandoval accepted the amendment. Chang offered a friendly amendment that the staff be directed to work with the Library Foundation regarding funding. Sandoval refused the amendment, and Chang withdrew his motion. A vote was taken on the original motion and amendment to discuss the library structure naming at a subsequent meeting, and it carried unanimously. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. 16. Adopt policy on legislative priorities. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to accept the general guidelines for evaluation and response for legislative and ballots measures. Measures should be pertinent to at least one of the following: · Protect local revenues · Protect or increase local government discretion · Protect or increase funding for specific programs or services (e.g. park bonds) · Support key programmatic goals (e.g. expansion of recyclable materials) · Prevent unfounded mandates · Be consistent with existing city policy · Have a direct impact on the city And the top five priorities are: · Long-term finances · Infrastructure · Land use planning · Affordable and attainable housing · Traffic calming March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 12 17. 18. 19. The motion carried unanimously. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, SandovaI. Noes: None. Absent: None. Set date for a Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA) meeting. (No documentation in packet). Council concurred to hold the meeting on Friday, March 28, at 4:15 p.m. Select application deadline and interview dates for Teen Commission applications. Council concurred to establish a deadline of May 9 for applications; to conduct interviews on June 3 at 5:00 p.m.; if there are more than six applicants in a grade, the Clerk will provide a matrix for Council ranking by May 15, to be returned by May 21; and to direct that the Parks and Recreation staff distribute reminder notices and brochures to middle and high schools in the Cupertino corporate limits, with emphasis on Kennedy and Hyde Middle Schools. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1916: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 11.08.270 Related to Skateboarding and Roller Skating at the Civic Center Plaza." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: Chang James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. ORDINANCES 20. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1914: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.24.170 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Parking Limitation on Certain Streets, Establishing a 30-Minute Limited Parking Zone on Bonny Drive, Scofield Drive, and Pepper Tree Lane, in the Vicinity of Faria School." James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. James/Lowenthal moved and seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1914. Ayes: Chang, Jmnes, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. STAFF REPORTS 21. Receive interim report on proposal from Council member Sandoval regarding a City policy on Responsible Contracting. March 17, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 13 The Public Works Director said that staff was working on this project, and has received a number of responses to questionnaires. He will give a full report on April 7. Council received the report. Sandoval handed out her proposed policy, which had one new correction since it was last distributed to the Council members. She said a responsible contracting policy should cover all public works projects, not just the library project, and should have a mechanism for enforcement. 22. Receive a monthly status report on the Cupertino Civic Center and Library Project. The Public Works Director showed a video roll-in of the progress of the demolition project, and distributed a list of bid alternates that Council may wish to consider. Council received the report. COUNCIL REPORTS Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events, and concurred to move the CREST (Cupertino Recognizes Extra Steps Taken) awards to Friday, May 16, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers so that they can attend a state budget briefing. CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT At 12:18 a.m. the meeting was adjourned to Friday, March 28, 4:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers to discuss the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA). Kimberly Smith, City Clerk For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. CUPER,_TINO ROLL CALL DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned Meeting Friday, March 28, 2003 At 4:20 p.m. Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: Richard Lowenthal and Patrick Kwok. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Assistant City Attorney Eileen Murray, and Deputy City Clerk Grace Johnson. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None NEW BUSINESS 1. Discuss the City of Cupertino's continued participation with the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA), and consider other available options. Administrative Director Carol Atwood reviewed the staff report. Council concurred to take no action. ADJOURNMENT At 4:30 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Grace Johnson, Deputy City Clerk For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Cham~el 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City ChanneI, 777-2364. DRAFT 1LESOLUTION NO. 03-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAiN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREiNAFTER DESCKEBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 14, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of Apr±l ., 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBLrRSEMENT FUIqD SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 598778 V ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DBPT 01/31/03 M2003 C B P O 110{300 1020 599629 03/14/03 7 A~AG PLAN CORPORATION 1104540 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 999624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 1020 599624 03/I4/03 9 1020 599624 03/14/03 9 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599625 03/14/03 28 1020 599626 03/14/03 2276 1020 599626 03/14/03 2276 1020 599626 03/14/03 2276 TOT~kL CHECK 1020 599627 03/14/03 2330 1020 599627 03/14/03 2330 TOT;kL CHECK 1020 599628 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599629 03/14/03 2799 1020 599630 03/14/03 57 1020 599631 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599632 03/14/03 720 1020 599633 03/14/03 1731 1020 599634 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599635 03/14/03 127 1020 599636 03/14/03 1145 1020 599637 03/14/03 1476 1020 599638 03/14/03 2232 1020 599638 03/14/03 2232 TOT~LL CHECK AXAG POWER PUEC~LASING PO 1108501 ABAG POWER PIIRC~U~SING PO 1108509 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 1108507 ;%BAG POWER PUEC~iASING PO 1108508 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 5708510 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 1108505 ~%BAG POWER PLIRCHASING PO 1108504 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 5606620 AIRGAS NCN 2708405 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPP 2708405 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPP 2708405 ~4ERIC~-N SOCIETY ON AGIN 1106500 APPLE COMPUTER INC 5208003 AI~K 1104510 ~ INTEP~NATIONAL 1104300 BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308840 ROGER BERRY 4259314 C E P O 1104300 TEE CA~LIFORNIA CHAPEL 1103500 CALIFOR-NIA SURVEYING & D 1108101 CAb~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 C~kRIAGA, LOURDES 110 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX K.BERNARD CONF FEE2-7 PAGE 1 AMOUNT -1657.00 MILLAR CLAIM 0.00 457.96 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 1078.49 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 50.90 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 315.38 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 47.62 FEB2003 STATEM~ENT 0.00 532.78 PEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 201.72 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 1750.80 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 632.80 FEB2003 STATE~NT 0.00 620.57 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 105.19 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 40.12 WATER DELIVERY AND DIS 0.00 45.75 BOTTLED WATER SERV 0.00 195.90 BOTTLED WATER SERV 0.00 154.00 0.00 395.65 SUPPLIES 8797 0.00 37 SUPPLIES 8788 0.00 376.87 0.00 753.74 AM SOCIETY AGING 0.00 135.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 2845.34 EMPLOYEE COFFEE SERV 0.00 389.52 ~%RMA RENWL K.SMITH 0.00 125.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 162.21 PUELIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.OO 21568.00 REPL CK 598776 0.00 1657.00 PROGR~V~MING M3~CH03 0.00 253.34 BOND PAPER 0.00 191.43 FINiaL PYMT 0.O0 630.39 CSGAI~NSMNT 0,00 306.50 SSGARNSMNT 0.00 103.84 0.00 410.34 RtrN DATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:11 - FINAMCI;LL ACCODNTING 03/13/03 PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" FLrND - 110 - GENERItL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599639 03/14/83 1460 TONI CARREIR0 6104800 I020 599640 03/14/03 147 CASH 5506549 1020 599640 03/14/03 147 C~H 5506549 1020 599640 03/14/03 147 CASH 5506549 TOT/fL CHECK 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CASH 1107302 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 C345B 1101201 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CASH 1104400 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CASB 1104000 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CA~ 11D7301 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CASH 1107200 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CASH 2709449 1020 599641 03/14/03 149 CASH 1101050 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599642 I020 599643 03/14/03 2208 03/14/03 155 03/14/03 1057 03/14/03 1057 1020 599645 03/14/03 1156 1020 599646 03/14/03 ME2003 1020 59964~ 03/14/03 169 1020 599648 03/14/03 178 1020 599649 03/14/03 1194 1020 599650 03/I4/03 1407 1020 599651 03/14/03 191 1020 599652 03/14/03 194 1020 599652 03/14/03 194 1020 599652 03/14/03 194 1020 599652 03/14/03 194 1020 599652 03/14/03 194 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599653 03/14/03 1034 1020 599654 03/14/03 214 ~0 599655 03/14/03 2864 CCAC:CITY CLERKS ASSOC O 1104300 CENTRAL WHOLESALE NL~SER 1108407 CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110 CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110 C}{A 110 CHESSEN, DEBI 5806349 CLEARY CONSULTItNTS INC 2709430 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEA~f 110 COURTESY TOW 6308840 CLUING HENDERSON TIRE 6308840 CUPERTINO CFIA~ER OF COB 1101000 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC ' 1108501 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108501 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108303 C~3PERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108504 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108503 DAILY JOUP~NAL CORPOP~TIO ll01500 DEPAR~EIfI OF TPJ%NSPORTA 1108602 DIAMOND TRIUMPH AUTO GLA 6308840 DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TIkE AMOUNT WEBSITE UPDATES 0.00 874.90 PETTY C~M 2/11-3/07 0.00 56.27 PETTY CASH 2/11-1/07 0.00 54.34 PETTY CASH 2/11-3/07 0.00 166.66 0.00 277.27 PETTY CASH 3/5-3/11 0,00 40.00 PETTY CASH 3/5-5/11 0.00 21.46 PETTY CASH 3/5-3/11 0.00 13.18 PETTY CASH 3/5-3/11 0.00 60.59 PE~Y CASE 3/5-~/11 0.00 20.00 PETTY CASH 3/5-3/11 0.00 20.00 PETTY CASH 3/5-3/11 0.00 26.07 PETTY C~H 3/5-3/11 0.00 57.75 0.00 259.05 0.00 395.00 0.00 268.30 0.00 349.94 0.00 522.42 0,00 872.36 K.SMITH CONF S.F. IJ%NDSCAPE SUPPLY 8784 *FLEX DEP/240125 *FLEX HLTH/240125 CbLA 0.00 144.85 SUMOOL SUPPLIES 0.00 59.67 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 2683.75 E7013899-0000 0.00 1203.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 40.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 112.79 TABLE/STAR AWRDS BNQ 0.00 680.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 88.43 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.53 ·FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC 0.00 81.79 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 44.24 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 209.54 0.00 489.53 S.JOSE POST-RECOil) 0.00 132.07 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC 0.00 57.03 SUPPLIES/REPAIR 0.00 173.54 RIAW I~ATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:12 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOI/NTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FL~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" FLr~ - 110 - GENER3tL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUR DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599656 03/14/03 1242 1020 599657 03/14/03 220 1020 599658 03/14/03 239 1020 599659 03/14/03 242 1020 599660 03/14/03 243 1020 599661 03/14/03 251 1020 599662 03/14/03 1949 1020 599662 03/14/03 1949 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599663 03/14/03 280 1020 599663 03/14/03 260 1020 599663 03/14/03 260 1020 599663 03/14/03 260 1020 599663 03/14/03 260 1020 599669 03/14/03 260 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599664 03/14/03 2589 1020 599664 03/14/03 2589 TOTAL CHECK 1020 1020 1020 TOTAL CHECK 599665 03/14/03 2558 599666 03/14/03 2870 599666 03/14/03 2870 1020 599667 03/14/03 268 1020 599667 03/14/03 268 1020 599667 03/14/03 268 TOTAL CHECK 1020 1020 i020 TOTAL CHECK 599668 03/14/09 274 599669 03/14/03 281 599669 03/14/03 281 1020 599670 03/14/03 ME2003 1020 599671 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599672 03/14/03 1741 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1108407 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 5806349 FEDER3kL EXPRESS CORP 110 FEDER3%L EXPRESS CORP 1108001 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 4209528 FEDEPJkL EXPRESS CORP 110 FEDER3%L EXPRESS CORP 1104300 FEDEP~kL EXPRESS CORP 1108101 JOHI~ FEEMSTER 5506549 JOHi~ FEEMSTER 5506549 FEET FIRST ENTERTAINMENT 5806349 FER~4A CORPORATION 4209224 FEPJ4A CORPORATION 4209223 FOSTER BROS SECLrRITY SYS 1108503 FOSTER BROS SECURITY SYS 1108312 FOSTER BROS SECI3RITY SYS 1108504 FRY'S ELECTRONICS 6104800 GARDENI~kND 6308840 GARDENL~ 6308840 GOEPFERT, GLEArN 2709449 GOLDEN-GREENE SCHOOL 5506549 GOVCONNECTION, INC. 6104800 DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 3 AMOUNT B.CARDS/M.DRAKE 0.00 57.21 PRESCHOOL SPLY 17071 0.00 53.23 SUPPLIES 0.00 30.44 SIT/932-0014-5 0.00 16977.99 SDI/776-5260-0 0.00 908.65 DORMENT SPP, AY CRKSIDE 0.00 1800.00 2/01-2/28 0~00 162.38 1/01-1/31/03 0.00 162.39 0.00 324.76 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 38.94 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 41.68 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 14.52 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 18.27 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 38.44 COQRIER SERVICE 0.00 1~ 0.00 16 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 380.00 0.00 21000.00 0.00 30018.75 0.00 51018.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DJ/JR DANCE 3/14 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT SUPPLIES 0.00 136.45 SUPPLIES 0.00 136.46 SUPPLIES 0.00 136.45 0.00 409.36 0.00 164.38 0.00 35.83 0.00 93.34 0.00 129.17 0.00 102.60 0,00 50.00 COMPUTER SPLY/15522 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PLrRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLrRC M~Y AVE INTERVIEWS PERFORMANCE 3/20/03 JETDIRECT USB PRINT SE RUN DATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:12 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING O3/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- qCTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 4 AMOUNT 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108303 102S 599673 03/14/03 296 GRAINGER INC 1108509 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108303 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108508 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108303 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108321 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108315 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108303 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GP. AINGER INC 1108504 1020 599673 03/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 2708405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599674 03/14/03 2630 GREGORY B. BIIAGG & ASSOC 6204550 1020 599675 03/14/03 2546 GTM PLUMBING 1108511 1020 599676 03/14/03 2522 L~NN HELLER 5506549 1020 599677 03/14/03 2868 HILL ASSOCIATES 5609112 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 -- O 599679 03/14/03 334 3 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/08 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 934 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 1020 599679 03/14/03 334 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599680 03/14/03 i898 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 ~0 599680 03/14/03 1898 HOME DEPOT/GECF 5606640 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 HOME DEPOT/GECE 1108303 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108314 HOME DEPOT/GECF 5606620 HOME DEPOT/OECF 1108407 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108407 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108315 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108407 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108408 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108408 HOME DEPOT/GECF 5606620 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108314 HOME DEPOT/GECE 1108303 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108830 HO~tE DEPOq GECF 1108303 HOME DEPO] GECF 1108830 HOME DEPO9 GECF 1108407 HOME DEPOT GECF 1108303 HOME DEPOT GECF 5606620 HOME DEPOT GECF 1108508 HOME DEPOT GECF 1108501 HOME DEPOT GECF 1108315 HOME DEPOT GECF 1106321 AUTOMATIC I lAIN CO. 1108407 AUTO[4ATIC RAIN CO. 1108407 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108315 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108315 PART~ SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS 'SUPPLIES FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC ADMINISTRATION MAR03 TIME/MATERIALS CRKSDE SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PARTS/SUPPLIES 15932 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24237 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24582 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24238 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15934 PARTS~SUPPLIES 24558 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24559 PARTS SUPPLIES 8775 PARTS SUPPLIES 27170 PARTS SUPPLIES 27171 PARTS SUPPLIES 27172 PARTS SUPPLIES 15935 PARTS SUPPLIES 24583 PARTS 'SUPPLIES 24379 PARTS 'SUPPLIES 20522 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8722 pARTS/SUPPLIES 20523 PARTS/SUPPLIES 6799 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8767 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15938 PARTS/SUPPLIES 27201 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24117 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8781 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24115 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O,OO 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 133.63 66.90 37.93 85,37 57.73 571.91 157.06 274.95 189.59 369.66 1944.91 1575.00 543.00 420.00 5083.76 321.69 39.89 4.31 29.67 273.32 51.57 51.57 215.49 33.88 41.60 50.12 389.33 10.81 25.92 37.88 120.69 15.64 88.98 245.84 228.62 14.03 27.01 446.88 19.38 2784.12 160.76 404.96 32.90 153.70 RUN DATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:12 - FINIkNCIAL ACCOEE~TING 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOL~NTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBb'RSEMEN~ FUI~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FL~/DEPT 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 AOTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1109314 1020 599689 03/14/03 1898 AL~TOMATIC R~IN CO. 1108312 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 AL~OMATIC P~IN CO. 1106303 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC P~IN CO. 1108302 1020 599680 08/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108321 1020 599880 03/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1108315 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC P~AIN CO. 1108315 1020 599680 03/14/03 1898 AUTO~{ATIC PAIN CO. 1108314 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599681 03/14/03 343 1020 599681 V 03/14/03 343 TOTAL CHECK ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599682 03/14/03 995 INSERV COMPS-NY 1108501 1020 599682 03/14/03 995 INSERV COMPAA~f 1108504 TOTAJ~ CHECK 1020 599683 03/14/03 353 1020 599664 03/14/03 1009 1020 599685 03/14/03 2886 1020 599686 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599687 03/14/03 369 1020 599687 03/14/03 369 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599688 03/14/03 1705 1020 599689 03/14/03 M 1020 599690 03/14/03 2861 1020 599691 03/14/03 385 1020 599692 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599693 03/14/03 405 1020 599694 03/14/03 2356 1020 599695 03/14/03 1463 1020 599696 03/14/03 815 1020 599697 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599698 03/14/03 1175 IRON MOL~AIN 1104300 J.A. SEY, AUER INC 1108801 }%ATHLEEN ELLIOTT 2204011 KC&J INVESTMENT KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108406 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108504 }~ & D MACHINE 6308840 KOE, KIYOUNG 580 kq3RTT INTEP~NATIONAL TRUC 6308840 I2~ SAFETY SUPPLY 1108508 LAKE BILTMORE 110 LONGS DRUGS #114 1108601 LYI~X TEC}~NOLOGIES 2109612 MAACO AUTO PAINTING & BO 6308840 MACS LA~ INC 4239222 MARTIN MILLER 1101070 MCWHORTER & YOUNG 1108408 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... FY 2002-2003 OPEN PDRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PDRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002r2003 OPEN P~JRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2902-2003 OPEN PURC SUPPLIES TLT RM RENTAL 3/01 REFD DEV.M~INT FEE GPAFITTI PAINT 8777 PAINT SUPPLIES REPAIRS 8800 Refund: Check - Overpa PARTS/SUPPLIES 8779 SUPPLIES REFD DEV.MAINT FEE FILM DEV 13271 S.DPAIN GIS DATA DEV SUPPLIES ASBESTOS SAMPLING S.DIEGO CONF 3/20-22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24544 PAGE 5 16.24 161.96 161.96 161.96 161.96 110.06 161.96 161.96 1850.28 6489.41 0.00 211.63 211.63 423.26 207.27 38.75 20r 654.92 395.55 42.36 437.91 149.74 64.00 315.85 159.37 3000.00 25.14 2200.00 896.42 1685.00 RUN ~A~E 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:12 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/13/03 CITY OF C~TpERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- 'CTION CRITERIA: transa¢t.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/I4/2003" FUI~D - 110 - GENERAL FUIqD CASR ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT PAGE 6 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 1020 1020 TOTAL CRECK 599699 03/14/03 1868 599700 03/14/03 444 599700 03/14/03 444 METRO MOBILE CO~94JNICATI 6308840 MINTON'S LURER 1108303 MINTON'S LUMBER 1'106903 1020 599701 03/14/03 2567 MISDU 110 1020 599702 03/14/03 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 1020 599702 03/14/03 447 MISSION UNIFOP~4 SERVICE 1108201 1020 599702 03/14/03 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 1020 599702 03/14/03 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1109201 1020 599702 03/14/03 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 1020 599702 03/14/03 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 TOTAL CRECK 1020 599703 03/14/03 475 1020 599704 03/14/03 302 1020 599705 03/I4/03 2862 599706 03/14/03 2562 1020 599707 03/14/03 485 1020 599707 03/14/03 485 1020 599707 03/14/09 485 1020 599707 03/14/03 485 TOTAL CRECK 1020 599708 03/14/03 493 1020 599708 03/14/03 493 1020 599708 03/14/03 493 1020 599708 03/14/03 493 1020 599709 03/14/03 493 1020 599709 03/14/03 493 1020 599708 03/14/03 493 TOTI~L CHECK 1020 599709 03/14/03 1190 1020 599710 03/14/03 501 1020 599711 03/14/03 500 1020 599711 03/14/03 500 1020 599711 03/14/03 500 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599712 03/14/03 1220 ~--q 599712 03/14/03 1220 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RE 4239222 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPEN 110 NATURE WOK 5506549 NEWCOMB MEC~ANIC3%L INC. 1108504 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2708405 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2709409 NEW~T1~AFFIC SIGNS 2708405 NEW~AFFIC SIGNS 2708405 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 OFFICE DEPOT 1106265 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 OFFICE DEPOT 1106266 OFFICE DEPOT 1103500 OFFICE DEPOT 5609112 RON~tLD OLDS 1103500 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 OPERATING ENGINEERS pUB 110 OPEP. ATING ENGINEERS PUB 1104510 OPERATING ENGINEERS PUB 1104510 ORCI43~RD SUPPLY ~L~RDWARE 1108830 ORCH3~ SUPPLY HA.qDWARE 1108830 REPAIR POWER SUPPLY PARTS/SUPPLIES 16141 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24116 0.00 236.66 0,00 32,36 0.00 25.62 0.00 47.98 CSGARNSMNT 0.00 223.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 97.09 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 97.09 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 97.09 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0,00 97.09 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 18.74 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUBC 0.00 21.99 0.00 429.09 REMOVE/RELOCATE 2/14 0.00 361.86 *NAT'L DEF 0.00 17873.80 LUNCH 3/5 0.00 113.66 REMOVE A~D REPI~CE COM O.O0 9576.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 735.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC 0.00 661.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 571.75 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 96.71 0.00 2084.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 56.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 303.02 RETL~R~ 195836780-001 0.00 -85.25 COFFEE 0.00 48.28 SEE CM 496371691001 0.00 35.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 282.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES O.O0 233.73 0.00 923.67 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 316.25 UNION DUBS 0.00 572.40 EMPLOYEES 0.00 4490.00 RETIRED SPOUSAL 0.00 4575.00 RETIREE 0.00 898.00 0,00 9963.00 ON-TIME DISCOUNT 0.00 -11.15 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 83.72 RUN ~ATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:13 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBQRSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSLrE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT TOT~tL CHECK 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORCH~ SUPPLY ~IARDW~E 1109315 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}{ARD SUPPLY PJkRDWARE 1108303 1020 599713 03/14/03 961 ORCHARD SUPPLY F2%RDWARE 1108315 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORCN~D SUPPLY }{ARDWARE 1108312 1020 599713 03/14/03 961 ORCH3%RD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC~L~RD SUPPLY }LARDW]tRE 1108303 1020 999713 03/14/03 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 2706405 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}LARD SUPPLY FL%RDWARE 1108303 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}~Ai{DSUPPLYN/kP~DWA.qE 1108315 1020 599713 03/14/03 991 ORCHARD SUPPLY }QkRDW~E 1108303 1020 ~99713 03/14/03 991 ORC~L~RD SUPPLY ~LARDWARE 1108406 1020 599713 03/14/03 991 ORC~L~RD SUPPLY ~L~d~DWARE 1109312 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC~LARD SUPPLY ~L~WARE 1108315 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}{ARD SUPPLY H3~WARE 1108408 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC~LARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC~D SUPPLY ~L~RDWARE 1108407 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORCFL~RD SUPPLY ~LARDWARE 1108303 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORCNARD SUPPLY NARDW~tRE 1108303 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}L~D SUPPLY }D~DW/~P~E 2708405 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}QARD SUPPLY }{ARDW;kRE 1108312 1020 599713 03/14/03 981 ORC}{ARD SUPPLY NARDWARH 1108315 TOTItL CHECK 1020 599714 03/14/03 507 DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 6308840 1020 599714 03/14/03 507 D~N OSBOP~NE DBA:OSBOR/~E 1108503 1020 599714 03/14/03 507 DRN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 1108501 TOT]iL CHECK 1020 599715 03/14/03 833 P S R S 110 1020 599715 03/14/03 839 P E R S 110 1020 599715 03/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599715 03/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599715 03/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599715 03/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599715 03/14/03 833 P E R S 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599716 03/14/03 910 P.D.M. STEEL 1108303 1020 599716 03/14/03 510 P.D.M. STEEL 1108314 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108509 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108507 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599717 03/14/83 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108201 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5606640 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5606620 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC SELL 1106508 1020 599717 03/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES PARTS/SUPPLIES 8792 0.00 96.30 PA2~TS/SUPPLIES 13068 0.00 47.32 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24208 0.00 22.72 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8785 0.00 431.30 PANTS/SUPPLIES 24210 0.00 49.45 PARTS/SUPPLIES 13069 0.00 49.76 PARTS/SUPPLIES 27113 0.00 44.23 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8787 0.00 293.79 P~%RTS/SUPPLIES 6802 0.00 285.40 PARTS/SUPPLIES 13070 0.00 31.36 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8755 0.00 136.76 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15049 0.00 21.64 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24378 0.00 27.52 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8756 0.00 318.15 PANTS/SUPPLIES 15598 0.00 52.47 P/%qTS/SUPPLIES 8776 0.00 75.11 PARTS/SUPPLIES 13066 0.00 51.65 PANTS/SUPPLIES 13067 0.00 21.60 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24565 0.00 31.19 P;kRTS/SUPPLIES 8783 0.00 241.66 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24209 0.00 ? 0.00 TIME/MATERIALS TIME/MATERIALS TIME/MATERIALS PERS EMPLY PERS BUYSK *PERS SYBK PERS HMPLY *PERS BYBK PERS 1959 PERS SPEC PARTS/SUPPLIES PARTS/SUPPLIES 0,00 210.99 0.00 320.19 0.00 405.00 0.00 936.04 0.00 25527.26 0.00 37.52 0,00 216.60 0,00 462.65 0.00 119.04 0.00 132.63 0.00 26675.84 0.00 403.76 0.00 150.24 0.00 554.00 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 54.45 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 54.45 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 114.21 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 249.I5 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 163.06 FES2083 STATEMENT 0.00 159.78 FEB2003 STATEMENT 0.00 60.21 RUN DATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:13 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/13/03 CITY OF C~3PERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND --'ECTION CRITERIA: transact.~rans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO TOTAL C"HECK 1020 599718 ISSUE DT .............. VE~fDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 03/14/03 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM 1108501 1020 599719 03/14/03 513 1020 599739 03/14/03 513 1020 899719 03/14/03 513 1020 599719 03/14/03 513 1020 599719 03/14/03 513 1020 599719 03/14/03 513 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599720 1020 599721 1020 599721 TOT~J~ CHECK 03/14/03 M2003 03/14/03 515 03/14/03 515 1020 599722 03/14/03 526 1020 599723 03/14/03 533 --n0 599724 03/14/03 537 3 599724 03/14/03 537 1020 599724 03/14/03 537 1020 599724 03/14/03 537 1020 599724 03/14/03 537 1020 599724 03/14/03 537 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599725 03/14/03 M2003 1020 599726 03/14/03 1247 1020 599727 03/14/03 2278 1020 599728 03/14/03 2802 1020 599728 03/14/03 2902 1020 599730 03/14/03 570 1020 599731 03/14/03 2848 1020 599732 03/14/03 2482 1020 599732 03/14/03 2482 1020 599732 03/14/03 2482 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GA~ & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SkLES TAX 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 ~0 599737 03/14/03 625 #2719771 2/07-3/06 0.00 0.00 1108602 2/01-3/04 0.00 1108407 1/31-3/03 0.00 5606620 1/28-2/27 0.00 5606620 1/28-2/27 0.00 1108506 1/29-2/27 1108506 1/28-2/27 0.00 0.00 PACIFIC RIM FINANCIiLL CO 110 PACIFIC WEST SECLTRITY IN 1108501 PACIFIC WEST SEC"JRITY IN 1108501 PENINSb~ DIGITAL IMAGIN 4209534 PERS LONG TERM C~ PROG 110 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108302 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108303 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108321 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108315 P~TPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108312 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108314 PFSA 6308840 ~LA~IE PRESTON 5609112 QU~LS, R/~LPH 1108001 QUA/qTUM DESIGN 6109869 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 1108830 93%DIO SHACK 8308840 RO IA~TERIORS 4239222 ROBERT HALF TECRMOLOGY 6104800 ROBERT ~IALF TECRMOLOGY 6104800 ROBERT N/tLF TEC~OLOGY 6104800 REFD DEV.MAINT FEE' MONITOR FEE btAR03 INSTALLATION PAGE 8 AMOUNT 909.76 88.88 44.33 7.67 146.84 76.28 627.39 119.31 1021.82 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~/~Y 1108314 SA/q JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108407 0.00 2133.62 0.00 2.00 0.00 350.00 0.00 352.00 25 SETS OF PLaiNS 0.00 658.43 PERS LTC/2408 0.00 304.16 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PDRC ~f 2002-2003 OPEN PORC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PL~C FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC PY 2002-2003 OPEN PL~C 0.00 675.75 0.00 675.75 0.00 675.75 0.00 675.75 0.00 675.75 O.O0 675.75 0.0O 4054.50 PFSA DUES R.SILVA 0.00 90.00 S,C~EEK DESIGN KITE 0.00 28,63 CONF 2-25-28 MONTEREY 0.00 607.65 M3%R2003 WEB HOSTING 0.00 1500.00 CONCRETE 8812 0.00 418.93 SUPPLIES 24486 0.00 43.74 INSTALLATION OF WORKST 0.00 2706.25 J.SEVER3%NCE W/E 2/21 0.00 462.00 J.SEVERANCE W/E 2/28 0.00 1176.00 J.SEVEP. ANCE W/E 3/07 0.00 1008.00 0.00 2646.00 1/29-2/27/03 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 118.26 0.00 63.43 RUN D~%E o3/13/o3 TIME 13:20:13 - FIN/%NCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 S;~NJOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAi~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA]~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAiqY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAbTY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA]~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAi~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 5708510 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108408 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~rf 1108504 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5506620 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP;~ 1108312 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~/gY 1108312 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 S]~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP/~NY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA2{Y 1108321 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAAD/ 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~N~Y 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPi~/qY 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAINY 1108506 1020 999737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/05 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPS-NY 1108505 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/qY 1108505 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/gY 1108321 1020 599737 03/14/~3 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA]NY 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAN AMOUNT 12/26-2/26/03 0.00 37.64 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 92.25 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 92.52 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 25.69 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 25.69 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 23.98 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 22.80 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 9.09 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 17.12 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 294.69 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 152.49 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 61.71 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 91.26 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 83.99 12/24-2/26/03 0.00 128.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 117.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 80.58 1/29-2/27/03 0.0O 97.41 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 66.85 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 349.52 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 29.12 1/29-2/27/03 0.O0 904.35 1/31-3/04/03 0.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 9 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 73.71 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 118.26 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 215.44 1/06-3/06/03 0.00 172.97 1/06-3/05/03 0.00 272.01 1/03-3/06/03 0.00 31.53 1/06-3/08/03 0.00 157.33 1/07-3/06/03 0.00 ~8.98 1/06-3/06/03 0.00 122.62 1/06-3/06/03 0.00 20.34 1/07-3/07/03 0.00 122.61 1/07-3/07/03 0.00 76.69 1/14-3/06/03 0.00 174.92 12/26-2/27/03 0.00 75.40 1/09-3/06/03 0.00 77.04 12/27-2/27/03 0.00 63.10 12/24-2/26/03 0.00 112.08 12/26-2/27/03 0.00 104.42 12/26-2/28/03 0.00 169.23 1/06-3/06/03 0.00 33.26 1/07-3/06/03 0.00 52.37 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 137.09 1/31-3/04/03 0.00 9.00 1/31-3/04/03 0.00 86.50 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 111.22 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 148.17 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 52' ~ RUN DATE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:14 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING PERIOD: -- ~CTION CRITERIA: CITY OF C~JPERTINO 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" CASH ACCT CNECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA/~JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPAI~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 598737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP/~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 S~ JOSE WATER COMPA]~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA/~JOSE WATER COMPA~rf 1108506 1020 588737 03/14/03 625 SAR JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP;~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA/~JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAiqY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA/qJOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP;~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~NY 5606620 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 ~9 599737 03/14/03 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMP~Y 1108407 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~ 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA/qJOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 S$~NJOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108303 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMP~N~f 1108503 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAI~JOSE WATER COMPi~/qY 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 S;~NJOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108507 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA]~ 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108302 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108314 1020 599737 03/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~k4Y 1108314 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599738 03/14/03 625 SA/N JOSE WATER COMPANY 2708403 1020 599739 03/14/03 1873 SA/~TA CI~CI~ FIRE DE 1101000 1020 599740 03/14/03 258 SA2~TA CI~ COUNTY 110 1020 599741 03/14/03 1636 SA/~TA CL/~ CTY SHERIFF 1104510 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 118.64 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 202.02 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 169.01 1/06-3/05/03 0.00 212.95 1/31-3/04/03 0.00 86.50 1/29-2/27/03 O.00 485.19 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 138.99 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 37.70 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 37.70 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 12.52 12/24-2/26/03 0.00 22.79 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 125.07 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 15.41 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 15.41 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 78.85 1/31-3/04/03 0.00 36.50 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 25.69 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 9.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 17.36 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 47.96 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 15.41 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 15.41 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 77.08 1/29-2/27/09 0.00 60.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 37.70 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 311.84 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 430.05 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 279.29 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 1024.53 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 75.42 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 60.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 61.71 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 60.00 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 77.13 1/29-2/27/03 O,OO 140.52 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 131.98 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 113.12 1/29-2/27/03 0.00 9.00 0.00 10891.08 REPAIRS/NANCY CRT 0.00 1034.35 AWARDS DINNER S.JAMES 0.00 28.00 V ORTEGA 563312780 0.00 352.62 FINGERPRINTS JAN2003 0.00 24.00 RUI~ ~TE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:14 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 11 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISEURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599742 03/14/03 633 S;%NTA CL$kRA COUNTY SHERI 5806349 1020 599743 03/14/03 1488 SEARS 1108503 1020 599744 03/14/03 2313 SHERVINGTON, SKIP 1102100 1020 599745 03/14/03 1799 SHIELDS, }L~RPSR & CO. 6308840 I020 599746 03/14/03 651 SIERRA PACIFIC TLrRF SUPP 1108315 1020 599747 03/14/03 2810 S~2%RT & FINAL 5806349 1020 599748 03/14/03 1523 JANA SO~CALE 5609112 1020 599749 03/14/03 2780 1020 599749 03/14/03 2780 1020 599749 03/14/03 2780 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/83 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1010 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 5997S0 03/14/03 2820 1020 589750 03/14/03 2020 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 1020 599750 03/14/03 2820 TOTAL CI{ECK SPEEDEE TUNE ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE A/qD SERVICE 6308840 SPSRDEE TUNE ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPSEDEE TUNE AbrD SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE 7~JNE ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE AlgD SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE AND SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TLrNE ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE ~S ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE ~VJNE A~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE ~V3NE ~%rD SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE A[~q3SERVICE 6308840 SPEHDEE TUNE ~ SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE AND SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE kND SERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE ~T~NE ;%NDSERVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE 773NE ~-NDS~RVICE 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE A2~D SERVICE 6308840 1020 599751 03/14/03 1811 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 1020 599752 03/14/03 677 STATE STREET BANK & TRUS 110 1020 599753 03/14/03 1027 1020 599753 03/14/03 1027 1020 599753 03/14/03 1027 1020 599753 03/14/03 1027 TOTAL CHECK STEVENS CREEK QUARRY CON 2708404 STEVENS CREEK QU;kRRy CON 2708404 STEVENS CREEK QUA/~RY CON 2708404 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY CON 2708404 1020 599754 03/14/03 2863 SLrBr~tLE-CR3PERTINO 1101500 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SkLES TAX AMOUNT DANCE 2/21/03 0.00 324.54 REFRIGERATOR 8771 0.00 378.88 FOOD 0.80 91.07 PETRO VEND KS00 PHOENI 0.00 1092.09 SUPPLIES 0.00 394.95 DANCE SUPPLY 17222 0.00 158.48 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 1772.80 LIGHTWATCHM3%N A/DN ELEC 0.00 287.51 SUPPLIES 0.00 287.51 RETtPRN OF SUPPLIES 0.00 -287.51 0.00 287.51 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY O.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 2' SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 ~ SMOG UNECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY O.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 SMOG CHECK FOR 20 CITY 0.00 26.96 0.00 512.24 PREPAYMENT FEB03 0.00 777.00 *PERS DEE 0.00 3360.63 AGGREGRATE 0.00 27.77 DISCOUNT 0.00 -0.88 AGGREGATE 0.00 29.70 DISCOUNT 0.00 -0.83 0.00 55.75 RLrN D~TE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:14 - FIN~JqCIA3~ ACCOLINTING 03/13/03 CITY OF CTJPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 URECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND --aCTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT PAGE 12 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... S~ULE$ TRX AMOtq~T 1020 599755 03/14/03 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 599755 03/14/03 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 599785 03/14/83 2045 SVCN 1104300 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599786 03/14/03 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 1106265 1020 599757 03/14/03 699 TAP PI~TICS INC 1108507 1020 599758 03/14/03 700 1020 599758 03/14/03 700 1020 599758 03/14/03 700 1020 599758 03/14/03 700 1020 599758 03/14/03 700 1020 599758 03/14/03 700 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 TOTAL CHECK 1020 1080 1020 599759 03/14/03 701 TARqET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 TARGET SPECI~tLTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108302 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108321 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108814 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108315 TARGET STORES 5706450 599760 03/14/03 648 TMT ENTERPRISES, INC. 1108315 599760 03/14/03 648 TMT ENTERPRISES, INC. 1108312 599760 03/14/05 648 TMT ENTERPRISES, INC. 1108314 599761 03/14/03 2396 599762 03/14/03 1993 599763 03/14/03 2781 599763 03/14/03 2781 599764 03/14/03 724 599765 03/14/03 727 599765 03/14/03 727 599765 03/14/03 727 599766 03/14/03 1154 1020 1020 1020 1020 599767 03/14/03 738 599768 03/14/03 310 599768 03/i4/03 310 599768 03/14/03 310 599768 03/14/03 318 599768 03/14/03 310 TREADWELL & ROLLO 4239222 TRFOkSLrRER OF ALAMEDA COU llO AL TSUGAWA 1104400 AL TSUGAWA 1104400 TL~F & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 6308840 U S POSTb~%STER 5806349 U S POSTT~%STER 5806249 U S POSTMASTER 5806449 UNITED WAY OF SANTA CI~ 110 VALLEY OIL COMPANY 6308840 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108505 VEEIZON WIRELESS 1108102 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108504 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107501 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108201 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 80.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PDRC 0.00 40.00 FY 2002-2008 OPEN PURC D.0O 50.00 0.00 170.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 41.83 SUPPLIES 0.00 37.89 FY 2002 2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 785.18 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 200.96 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.O0 142.91 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 142.91 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 142.92 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 142.91 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC O.0O 142.91 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PLrRC 0.00 142.91 0.00 1843.61 pARTS/SUPPLIES 23034 0.00 47.92 Ci~NDLESTICK BALLFIELD 0.00 365.57 CANDLESTICK BALLFIELD 0.00 365.53 CE~LESTICK BALLFI~LD 0.00 865.57 0.00 1096.67 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR A LOPEZ JR 566398128 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC POSTAGE STAMPS POSTAGE STAMPS POSTAGE STAMPS UNITED WAY FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC ~408456999 FEB03 ~408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 0.00 2674.80 0.00 253.84 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 O.OO BO0.O0 0.00 145.65 0.00 74.00 0.O0 74.00 0.O0 74.00 O.00 222.00 O.OO 122.10 O.O0 5198.17 0.00 95.97 0.00 201.61 0.00 390.72 0.00 54.07 0.O0 406.21 RUN D2%TE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:14 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 13 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK~ REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECT~ON CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" CASE ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEET 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 6104800 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108503 1020 599769 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1101200 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107503 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5606620 102~ 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108005 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VEEIZON WIRELESS 1108602 1020 599768 03/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 9208003 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599769 03/14/03 745 VMI INC 1103500 1020 599770 03/14/03 18 WASTE ORGA/~IZATION ADONA 6308540 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5606600 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5806449 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5806249 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 1106500 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5806349 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GPukPHICS 1106500 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5606600 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5806249 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPEICS 5806449 1020 599771 03/14/03 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5806349 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599772 03/14/03 779 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 1108509 1020 599772 03/14/03 779 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 1108830 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 599773 03/14/03 774 WESTERN HIO~IWAY PRODUCTS 2708405 1020 599773 03/14/03 774 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2708405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599774 03/14/03 2498 KIERSA WITT 1101070 1020 599775 03/14/03 794 XEROX CORPORATION 1104310 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 599776 03/14/03 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 TOTAL CHECK TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... #408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 #409456999 FEE03 #408456995 FEED3 #409456999 FEB09 #408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 #408456999 FEB03 REPAIRS/CAMERA 16462 HAZARDOUS WASTE RMVL 0.00 51.27 0.00 580.50 0.00 98.59 0.86 51.27 0.00 320.80 0.00 94.95 0.00 65.48 0.00 193.23 0.00 47.32 0.00 2651.89 0.00 382.48 0.00 3000.00 CORRECT PRICE 0.00 -10.89 CORRECT PRICE 0.00 -10.89 CORRECT PRICE 0.00 -10.89 CORRECT PRICE 0.00 -10.88 CORRECT PRICE 0.00 -10.89 PRINT COLLATE SADDLEST 0.00 548.87 PRINT COLLATE SA~DLEST 0.00 366.34 PRINT COLLATE SADDLEST 0.00 182' PRINT COLLATE SADDLEST 0.00 SUPPLIES LIGHT RECYCLING FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 200242003 OPEN pIIRC pLA~ COMMISSION DNR RECYCLED PAPER 0.00 125.03 0.00 2359.53 0.00 2484.56 0.O0 622.44 0.00 760.56 0.00 1383.00 0.00 116.91 0.O0 1337.97 0.00 -119.79 0.00 -484.93 0.00 -119.79 0.00 119.79 0.00 6489.41 0.00 119.79 O.OO 6124.27 0.00 291402.04 RUN D~TE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:15 O3/13/O3 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND --~CTIQN CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/10/2003" and "03/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND TOTAL REPORT SALES TA~ AMOUNT 0.00 291402.04 RLTN E~TE 03/13/03 TIME 13:20:15 - FINkNCIAL ACCOUNTING DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 21, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: D~rector of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April ,2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino ACCOUNTING PERIOD: CITY OF CUPERTINO 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.tran$_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" FUND - 118 - GENER~ CJ%SH ACCT C%4ECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FU~/DEPT 1020 599777 03/17/03 700 1020 599777 03/17/03 700 1020 5997~7 03/17/03 700 TOTAL CHECK TARGET SPECIA~LTY PRODUCT 1108315 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108314 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 1020 599778 03/21/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599778 03/21/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599778 03/21/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599778 03/21/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599778 03/21/03 4 A T & T 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599779 03/21/03 29 LYI~E DIANE AITF. EN 5706450 1020 599780 03/21/03 1884 1020 599780 03/21/03 1884 1020 599780 03/21/03 1884 1020 599780 03/21/03 1884 1020 599780 03/21/03 1884 1020 599780 03/21/03 1884 1020 599780 03/21/03 1864 TOTAL CHECK ;%LBERTSONS-NOR/14ER~ DI¥I 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORTHEP~N DIVI 5806349 J~LBERTSONS-NORTHEP~N DIVI 1106343 ~%LBERTSONS-NORTHERR DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORTHERN DIVI 1106343 ~tLBERTSONS-NOR~HER-N DIVI 1106343 ~BERTSONS-NORTHEP~ DIVI 5806349 599781 03/21/03 1795 ;~LL CHEM SUPPLY CO INC 5208003 1020 599782 03/21/03 2319 AJ~L CITY bIA~IAGEMENT SERV 1108201 1020 599783 03/21/03 2330 1020 599783 03/21/03 2330 TOTAL CHECK AF~ERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPP 1108314 ;%MERIC~ INDUSTRIAL SUPP 1106312 1020 599784 03/21/03 43 ~2~ERICAN PI~ING ~SOCI 1107301 1020 599785 03/21/03 1159 ARERIC3%N STAGE TODRS INC 5806349 1020 599786 03/21/03 M2003 ;%NGELA CHEN 1101070 1020 599757 03/21/03 96 ~{ROWNEAD MTN SPRING WAT 5696680 1020 599788 03/21/03 2504 A~E-LORP~INE B;~qI 5706450 1020 599789' 03/21/03 968 B~ ALFfO PARTS 6308840 1020 599789 03/21/03 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840 1020 599789 03/21/03 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599790 03/21/03 M EAUM. CLAIRE 580 1020 599791 03/21/03 85 BAY ~EA SHELVING INC 1108830 ~0 599792 03/21/03 2827 BAY ARE~ WOODWORK INC. 1108101 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... S~ALES TAX FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 AMOUNT 81.41 81.40 81.40 244.21 MA~CH2003 STATEMENT 0.00 20.05 ~C~2003 STATEMENT 0.00 20.05 5L~RC~2003 STATEMENT 0.00 20.05 MARCH2003 STATEMENT 9.00 20.05 MARCH2003 STATEMENT 0.00 34.51 0.00 114.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 240.00 SUPPLIES 23078 0.00 25.72 SUPPLIES 17225 0.00 52.74 SUPPLIES 17225 0.00 5.49 SUPPLIES 23232 0.00 25.87 SUPPLIES 25130 0.00 7.18 SUPPLIES 25134 0.00 7.98 SUPPLIES 23987 0.00 38.62 9.90 163.60 SUPPLIES 17343 0.00 SERVICES MARC5{ 2003 0.00 SUPPLIES 8815 8.00 SUPPLIES 8791 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AIRFAIR CONF/LUNC~ BOTTLED DRINKING WTR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2002-2003 OPEN PLrRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PL~C FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC Refund: Check - WINTER SUPPLIES SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.73 7487.40 515.67 520.84 1039.51 329,00 3030.00 141.50 75.47 570.00 33.49 39.70 224.25 297.44 57.00 2422.64 4806.00 RUN I~%TE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/20/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CEECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/17/2003" and "09/21/2003" FUND - 110 - GENER3%L FLIkfD ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 2 AMOUNT 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 TOTAL CHECK 599793 03/21/03 2895 599794 03/21/03 133 599795 03/21/03 130 599796 09/21/03 1145 599796 03/21/03 1145 1020 599797 03/21/03 132 1020 599797 03/21/03 132 1020 599797 03/21/03 132 1020 599797 03/21/03 132 1020 599797 03/21/03 132 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599798 03/21/03 BROWING-FERRIS IA[DUSTRIE 5208003 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT CO IN I108408 CALIFORxNIA PARK AND RECR 5606600 CALIFORNIA SDRVEYING & D 1108101 CJtLIFOP~NIA SURVEYING & D 110810i CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108407 C~.LIFOP~NIA WATER SERVICE 1108314 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108508 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108314 CALIFOR/~IA WATER SERVICE 1108407 M2003 C3%ROUSEL INi~ Al%rD SUITES 5806349 1020 599799 03/21/03 146 1020 599799 03/21/03 146 1020 599799 03/21/03 146 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599800 03/21/03 148 1020 599800 03/21/03 148 1020 599800 03/21/03 148 1020 599800 03/21/03 148 1020 599800 03/21/03 148 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599901 03/21/03 149 1020 599801 03/21/03 149 1020 599801 03/21/03 149 1020 599801 03/21/03 149 i020 599801 03/23/03 149 1020 559801 03/21/03 149 1020 599801 03/21/03 149 TOTAL CEECK 1020 599802 03/21/03 2626 1020 599803 03/21/03 174 1020 599803 03/21/03 174 1020 599803 03/21/03 174 1020 599803 03/21/03 174 1020 599803 03/21/03 174 1020 599803 03/21/03 174 TOTAL CEECK CASH 1108303 CASH 2708405 C;~SH 1108407 C~H 1108408 CASH 1108504 C~SE 5208003 CASH 1101000 CASE I101201 CASH 1104000 CASH 1104510 CHA2gG, CHEN-YA 1103300 COCA-COI2% 5706450 COCA COLA 5706450 COCA-COLA 5706450 COCA-COLA 5706450 COCA-COLA 5706450 COCA-COLA 5706450 LANDFILL FEB2003 PAXTS/SUPPLIES 8824 R.EARNSHAW #100159 DP~AFTING SUPPLIES DP~AFTING SUPPLIES FEE2003 SERVICE FEB2003 SERVICE FEB'003 SERVICE FEB2003 SERVICE FEB2003 SERVICE ROOMS/DISNEYLA/~D TRIP PETTY CA~N 2/28-3/11 PETTY CASN 2/28-3/11 PETTY CASE 2/28-3/11 PETTY CASH 3/08-3/11 PETTy C~H 3/08-3/11 PETTY C;%SH 3/08-3/11 PETTY CASH 3/08-3/11 PETTY CASH 3/08-3/11 0.00 98551.40 0.00 441.44 0.00 130.00 0.00 23.30 0.00 93.20 0.00 19.63 0.00 78.51 0.O0 1458.08 0.00 1196.00 0.00 41.89 0.00 116.71 0.00 0.00 24 0.00 39.58 0.00 10.68 0.00 50.93 0.00 14.81 0.00 4.86 0.00 120.87 PETTY CASH 3/3-3/18 0.00 35.00 PETTY C~H 3/3-3/18 O.O0 lO.00 PETTY C. ASH 3/3'3/18 O.O0 50.50 PETTY C3~H 3/3-3/18 0.00 29.00 PETTY C3%SH 3/3-3/18 0.00 34.10 PETTY CASH 3/3-3/18 0.00 15.00 PETTY CASH 3/3-3/18 0.00 74.14 0.00 247.74 CLIPPING ~ERV 2/1-28 FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PIIRC 0.00 200.00 0.00 154.24 0.00 653.52 0.00 348.96 0.00 401.00 0.00 283.74 0.00 390.40 0.00 2231.86 RUR ~TE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:00 - FIN~NCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CI4ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" C_ASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599804 1020 599805 1020 599806 1028 599807 1020 599808 1020 599809 1020 599810 1020 599811 1020 599812 1020 899813 1020 599814 1020 599814 --'~L CHECK 1020 599815 1020 599816 1020 599817 1020 599818 ISSUE DT .............. VE~IDOR ............. FU~D/DEPT 03/21/03 2857 03/21/03 1133 03/21/09 M2003 03/21/03 M2003 03/21/03 194 03/21/03 198 03/21/03 2866 03/21/09 201 03/21/03 2795 03/21/03 1242 03/21/03 220 O3/21/03 220 CONCI/R INC 2159620 C~LES CORR 1101070 COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERS 5606600 CULINARY CENTER 1106100 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 5606660 CUPERTINO UNION SCHL DIS 1106343 D.R.ELROD AND ASSOCIATES 1107405 DAPPER TIRE CO 6308840 DEVCON ASSOCIATES XVI 4239222 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1104310 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 5806349 DISCOLrNT SCI~OOL SUPPLY 5806349 03/21/03 222 03/21/03 228 03/21/03 249 03/21/03 253 03/21/03 260 03/21/03 260 DKS ASSOCIATES 2709531 DUBAY'S TIRE SERVICE INC 6308840 ESBRO UEEMIC~J~ 5606620 EXC}iANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606680 FEDER3%L EXPRESS CORP 110 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 4239222 03/21/03 2304 03/21/03 2304 03/21/03 2304 03/21/03 2304 FIELD PAOLI A-RCMITEC~E 4269212 FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECt"ORE 4269212 FIELD PAOLI ARCHITEC~E 4269212 FIELD PAOLI ARC"HITECTURE 4269212 03/21/03 2619 03/21/03 1255 03/21/03 262 03/21/03 262 GENEVIEVE FIRE 2308004 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308840 FIRST PLACE INC 1104300 FIRST PLJ~CE INC 1104300 03/21/03 266 RYAN FORBES 5806449 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR AIRFA/{E CONF 9/20-22 COSTCO DUES DEPkR/~4ENT RETREAT SUPPLIES SEATE PEK/KENNEDY SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2002-2003 OPEN PLrRC APRIL03 LIBPJ~RY RENT LETTEP~EAD ENVELOPES PRESCHOOL SPLY 17230 PRESCHOOL SPLY 17071 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR ALIGNMENT 8814 FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLIRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC COURIER SERVICE COURIER SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT PUBLIC WORKS CONTP. ACT PUELIC WORKS CON~RACT PUELIC WORKS CONTRACT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2802-2003 OPEN PURC NAME PLATES FP. AME/ENGRAVE pLATES SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 15383.00 178 . 00 90.00 1250,00 330.11 5.00 5553.64 359.06 16180. O0 2573.06 433.59 418.16 851.75 19000.50 98.00 283.44 273.40 96.28 26.80 123.08 6308.19 6824.36 3720.00 9350.10 26202.65 5567.50 58.58 23.32 84.44 107.76 1672.00 RUN DATE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/20/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD~ 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - D~SBURSEMENT FU~D SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_da~e between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FL~D/DEPT PAGE 4 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 599826 03/21/03 273 FREMONT UNION S.S. DIST. 1106448 1020 599827 03/21/03 281 G~qDENLJ%ND 8308840 1020 599827 03/21/03 281 GARDENL3~ND 6308840 1020 599827 03/21/03 281 GARDEAU~D 8308840 1020 599827 03/21/03 281 GARDENL~ 1108312 1020 599827 03/21/03 281 G~%RDENI2%ND 1108314 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599828 03/21/03 296 F~EN GOTTLEIE 5806449 1020 599829 03/21/03 298 GPu%INGER INC 110851i 1020 599828 03/21/03 298 GP~AINGER INC 5708510 1020 599829 03/21/03 298 GR~INGER INC 5708510 1020 599829 03/21/03 298 G~%AINGER INC 5606620 1020 599829 03/21/03 298 GP~INGER INC 5708510 1020 599829 03/21/03 298 ~P~AINGER INC 5708510 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599830 03/21/03 899 GUZZARDO & ~SOCIATES IN 4259313 1020 599831 03/21/03 2522 Lk~NHELLER 5906549 1020 599832 03/21/03 1898 ANTOMATIC P~IN CO. 1108315 1020 599832 03/21/03 1898 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108314 1020 599832 03/21/03 1898 AUTO~L%TIC RAIN CO. 1108314 1020 599892 03/21/03 1898 AUTOMATIC R~IN CO. 1108314 1020 599832 03/21/03 1898 AL~O~ATIC RAIN CO. 1108312 1020 599832 03/21/03 1898 AUTO~%ATIC P~IN CO. 1108408 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599833 03/21/03 M2003 HOUSING & CO~3NITY DEVE 5806649 1020 599834 03/21/03 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD i108302 1020 599834 03/21/03 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108315 1020 599834 03/21/03 2528 INOOOR EILLBO~qD 1108312 1020 599834 03/21/03 2528 INDOOR BILLBO~D 1108303 1020 599834 03/21/03 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108314 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599835 03/21/03 M2003 F3~, B~tRBARA 2150000 1020 599836 03/21/03 ME2003 KANE WOLFE 1108602 1020 599837 03/21/03 ME2003 KEVIN RIEDEN 1105102 1020 599838 03/21/03 1630 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INC 5806449 1020 599839 03/21/03 371 LISA KING 110 1020 599839 03/21/03 371 LISA KING 5806449 7/3-4 CUPERTINO HS 0.00 977.75 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.o0 134.23 FY 2002-2009 OPEN PURC 0.00 80.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PL~C 0.00 200.00 PA, qTS/SUPPLIES 8825 0.00 150.47 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8831 0.00 148.31 0.00 713.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 1500.00 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 58.67 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 111.73 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 53.06 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 605.02 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 26.61 PAXTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 49.48 0.00 904.57 PUNLIC WORKS CO~TRACT 0.00 17477.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 28 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 152.14 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 396.87 FY 2002-2003 OPEN P~/RC 0.00 64.93 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 43.13 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 676.23 PAXTS/SUPPLIES 8790 0.00 93.38 0.00 1426.68 HCD/P~NWL 22221 MCCLN 0.00 43.00 FY 200242003 OPEN pLrRC 0.00 246.31 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PL~C 0.00 246.32 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 246.32 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 246.31 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC 0.00 246.32 0.00 1231.58 REFD STOPES DP~IN FEE 0.00 1354.17 FEE/TRAVEL/PERDIEM 0.00 345.00 P.W. CONF 3/2'6 0.00 624.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 6816.30 25% FP~NCRISE T/%X BRD 0.00 -391.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 156 RUN ~TE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/20/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: ECTION CRITERIA: CITY OF CUPERTINO 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.~rans_date between "03/17/2803" and "03/21/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO TOTAL CHECK 1028 599840 1020 599841 1020 599842 1020 599843 1020 599844 1020 599845 1020 599846 1020 599847 1020 599848 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 03/21/03 2550 03/21/03 2804 03/21/03 1821 03/21/03 2300 03/21/03 393 03/21/03 M 03/21/03 M2003 03/21/03 1149 03/21/03 1378 03/21/03 1378 03/21/03 444 03/21/03 444 03/21/03 448 03/21/03 1023 03/21/03 456 03/21/03 1455 03/21/03 466 03/21/03 1137 03/21/03 471 03/21/03 2193 03/21/03 2132 03/21/03 2881 03/21/03 2881 01/21/03 2836 03/21/03 2836 KREINES & KREINES, INC. 1107302 LAKE TPJkFFIC SOLUTIONS 1108601 JULIA LAMY 1106500 B;~BA~ LAU~ 5506549 JOHi~ LEE 5806449 PAGE 5 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 1173.00 CONSULTING SERV 0.00 4060.00 RUN DATE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:01 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/20/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CRECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FL~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transac~.trans_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" ..... DESCRIPTION PAGE 6 1020 599862 03/21/03 2206 O.K. FIRE EQUIPMENT COMP 1104400 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108201 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1101000 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5806349 1020 599863 03/21/03 483 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104100 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108201 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1101200 1020 599863 03/21/03 483 OFFICE DEPOT 1101201 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1101200 1020 599863 03/21/03 483 OFFICE DEPOT 1107301 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107503 1020 599863 03/21/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249 TOTkL CHECK 1020 599864 03/21/03 494 1020 599864 03/21/03 494 TOTTkL CHECK OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500 1020 599865 03/21/03 503 ORC}U%R/DSUPPLY 5606640 1020 599865 03/21/03 503 ORCHAB/D SUPPLY 5606640 1020 599865 03/21/03 503 ORCHARD SUPPLY 5606640 TOTAL C}LECK 1020 599866 03/21/03 507 1020 599866 03/21/03 507 TOTAL CHECK DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 6308840 DRN OSBOP~NE DBA:OSBORNE 6308840 1020 599867 03/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599867 03/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 6104800 1020 599867 03/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599868 03/21/03 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLiDCOM 1108501 1020 599869 03/21/03 2884 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 PACIFIC COAST TR3%NE SERV 1108505 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108830 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 5606620 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 5606640 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 5708510 PACIFIC OAS & ELECTRIC 1108507 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108504 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108506 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108303 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108602 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108511 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1106503 RECHARGE/POWER OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ON-TIME DISCOUNT FY 2002-2003 OPEN PiIRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC TIME/MATERIALS TIME/MATERIALS 2/28-3/27 0.00 229.90 0.00 61.67 0.00 8,65 0.O0 21.64 0,O0 10.80 0.00 125.02 0.00 23.79 0.00 43.29 0.00 330.00 0.00 21.62 0.00 15.69 0.00 22.80 0.00 44.57 0.00 83.50 0.00 813.04 0.00 62.40 0.00 53.47 0.00 115.87 0.00 -7 0.00 296 0.00 108.23 0.00 397.48 0.00 385.67 0.00 685.59 0.00 1071.26 0,00 63.89 8.00 592.47 0.00 299.00 0.00 955.36 #2522405 2/16-3/15 0.00 8.88 TIME/MATERIALS FEB2003 CFL~RGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CFLARGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CPJ%RGES FEB2003 CHARGES FEB2003 CHARGES 0.00 550.00 0.00 25.85 0.00 662.80 0.00 164.55 0.00 3607.08 O,OO 894.82 0.00 4074.99 0.00 214.48 0.00 2338.35 0.0O 2474.88 0.00 347.09 0.00 1826 RUN D~TE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:01 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/20/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: ~C'fION CRITERIA: CITY OF CUPERTINO 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.~rans_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/09 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 1020 599870 03/21/03 513 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599871 03/21/03 M 1020 599872 03/21/03 2462 1020 599873 03/21/03 526 1020 599873 03/21/03 526 1020 599878 03/21/03 526 TOT~-L CHECK 1020 599874 03/21/03 M2003 1020 599875 03/21/03 690 1020 599875 08/21/03 690 1020 599875 03/21/03 690 1020 599879 03/21/03 690 --9 599875 03/21/03 690 .L CHECK 1020 599876 03/21/03 2837 1020 599877 03/21/03 2388 1020 599878 03/21/03 541 1020 599979 03/21/09 542 1020 599880 03/21/03 545 1020 599881 03/21/03 1456 1020 599882 03/21/03 560 1020 599882 03/21/03 560 TOT~J~ CHECK 1020 599883 03/21/03 2894 1020 599884 03/21/09 1406 i020 599885 03/21/03 988 1020 599887 03/21/03 606 1020 599888 03/21/03 2011 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC i PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC OAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108501 1108315 1108314 1108312 1108407 pARK, KYI/NG EEE 580 PECK JIIDAR TP~VEL BERV. 5506549 PENINSUhA DIGITAJ~ IMAGIN 4269212 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 4239222 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 1108101 PENINSOT~ADIVISION, LLC 1101200 PENINSt3]~ FORD 6308840 PENINSLU~A FORD 6308840 PENINSL~ FORD 6308840 PENINSULJ% FOP~ 6308840 PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS I 1108501 PETERSON'S VIDEO TR3%NSFE 5609112 ROBIN PICKEL 5706450 PINE CONE LL~ER 5606620 JEFF PISERCHIO 6608640 PITNEY BOWES INC 1104310 PUBLIC DIALOGUB CONSORTI 1102402 PUBLIC DI~LOGLrE CONSORTI 1102402 RAJANI PUPJUNIK 5506549 RAINES CHEVORLET 6308840 BOB EIZZO 1108201 JOYCE RUSSUM 5706450 S.O.S. SURVIVAL PRODUCTS 1104400 PAGE 7 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT FEB2003 C}U%RGES 0.00 4941.01 FEB2003 CFI%ROES 0.00 170.89 FEB2003 C}Q~RGES 0.0O 437.97 FEB2003 CH~GES 0.00 99.78 FEB2003 CRA/~GES 0.00 644.48 0.00 22929.18 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 120.00 IT~tLY 5/4-21 BAL~CE 0.00 107476.00 SPORTS CENTER PLUS 0.00 636.88 CIVIC C~/LIBP~Y 0.00 164.98 BMP SHEETS 0.00 69.82 0.00 1071.88 RUB DATE 03/20/03 TINLE 09:09:01 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/20/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: SELECTION CRITERIA: CITY OF CUPERTINO 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.%ran$_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASE ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599889 03/21/03 1069 1020 599890 03/21/03 2506 1020 599891 03/21/03 959 1020 599892 03/21/03 2784 1020 599893 03/21/03 2289 1020 599894 03/21/03 1702 1020 599895 03/21/03 628 1020 599896 08/21/03 2815 1020 599897 03/21/03 1919 1020 599898 03/21/03 2397 1020 599899 03/21/03 652 1020 599900 03/21/03 2320 1020 599901 03/21/03 2629 1020 599902 03/21/03 200 1020 599903 03/21/03 1548 1020 599903 03/21/03 1548 TOTTkL CHECK 1020 599904 03/21/03 877 1020 599905 03/21/03 2661 1020 599905 03/21/03 2661 TOTAL CEECK 1020 599906 03/21/03 1421 1020 599907 03/21/03 2549 1020 599908 03/21/03 2879 1020 599909 03/21/03 2880 1020 599910 03/21/03 M 1020 599911 03/21/03 2045 1020 599911 03/21/03 2045 1020 599911 08/21/03 2048 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT SAFE-HIT CORPORATION 2708405 DORIS S~%LGADO 57D6450 Si~N JOSE MERCURY NEWS 1104000 SANTA CLARA CASH REGISTE 5606640 S~;TA CL~ COIINTY 1104400 SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIBRA 4239222 SkNTA CL~ COUNTY SHERI 1102100 S~NTA CL3~ VALLEY 1106647 SANTA CLAP~ VALLEY TR3~NS 5500000 SAVIN CREDIT CORPOP~TION 1104310 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO. 1101500 SNAP-ON INDUSTRID~L 6308840 SHERRY WITT SNOW 5706450 LESLIE SOKOL DBA DANCEKI 5806449 SOL~kNO PRESS BOOKS 1101500 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS 1101500 STANLEY STEEMER 5708510 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 110 DEE STAUFFER 5706450 STEPREN FOSSLER COMPANY, 5606620 STRINGER, JOF2~ 580 SVUR 1104300 SVCN 1104300 SVCN 1104300 PAGE 8 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT PANTS/SUPPLIES 8808 0.00 365.83 SERVICE AGREEMENT F~R 0.00 120.00 SUESCRIPTION P~L 0.00 42.27 CASH REGISTER SERV 0.00 85.00 RUN DATE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:01 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- ECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" C~H ACCT CMECK NO 1020 599911 TOT~tL CHECK 1020 599912 03/21/03 695 1020 599912 03/21/03 695 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599913 03/21/03 696 1020 599914 03/21/03 701 1020 599915 03/21/03 M2003 1020 599916 03/21/03 2396 1020 599917 03/21/03 718 1020 599919 03/21/03 2403 1020 599919 03/21/03 2781 1020 599919 03/21/03 2781 TOTAL CMECK 599920 03/21/03 310 1020 599921 03/21/08 M 1020 599922 03/21/03 746 1020 599923 03/21/03 2404 1020 599924 03/21/03 745 1020 599925 03/21/03 754 1020 599926 03/21/03 765 1020 599927 03/21/03 774 1020 599927 03/21/03 774 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599926 03/21/03 2412 1020 599929 03/21/03 1131 1020 599930 03/21/03 792 TOTAL C~H ACCOUNT ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 03/21/03 2045 SVCN 1104300 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 8506549 TADCO SUPPLY 1108302 TARGET STORES 5706450 THE WOkSTER TEACHER 2204011 TRF~WELL & ROL~LO 4239222 TREE MOVERS 1108101 DR.TONY TROPF~ 5806449 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 VERY, MI%gJKI 580 VIKING OFFICE PRODUC~S 5506549 LI~FNETTE VISTE 5906449 194I INC 1103500 B~ARA WALTON 5806449 DR CRI-HSUI D WENG 5706450 WESTEP~N HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2708405 WESTERN HIGHEAY PRODUCTS 2708405 WESTERN PACIFIC DISTRIBU 1108501 CIDDY WORDELL 1107301 LILY WU 5706450 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 30.00 0.00 190.00 SENIOR SOCIALS 0.00 449.05 COFFEE 0.00 353.01 0.00 801.06 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PORC 0.00 64.95 SUPPLIES 25131 0.00 45.78 KEY RING 17423 0.00 280.95 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 4824.09 RELOCATE CHERRY TREES 0.00 24000.00 o3/20/03 ~IME - FINANCIAL ACCOO1NTING 03/20/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT PU~D SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/17/2003" and "03/21/2003" FUND - llS - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ............. VENDOR ............. F~3ND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... TOTAL REPORT PAGE SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 1003667.37 RUN DATE 03/20/03 TIME 09:09:02 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWiNG CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 28, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th .day of Apr±l 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOL~NTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 598503 V 1020 599846 V 1020 599932 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. PUND/DEPT 01/17/03 1242 DIGITAL PRIN~IMPRESSION 1101040 03/21/03 M2003 LOS ~tLTOS SCHOOL DISTRIC 5708510 03/29/03 2328 A/C SERVICE & DESIGN CO. 1108505 1020 599933 03/28/03 M2003 ;%APA 1101000 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 1020 599934 03/28/03 9 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599935 03/28/03 2909 1020 599936 03/28/03 2276 1020 599937 03/28/03 888 1020 S99938 03/28/09 61 1020 599938 03/28/03 61 1020 599938 03/28/03 61 TOT;fL C~ECK 1020 599939 1020 599940 1020 599941 1020 599941 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599942 1020 599943 1020 599944 1020 599944 TOTAL CHECK 03/28/03 M2003 03/28/03 M 03/28/03 968 03/28/03 968 ABAG POWER pURCHASING PO 1108508 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 1108507 ABAG POWER P~/RCHASING PO 1108501 A~AG POWER PUECHASING PO 1108509 ABAG POWER PURCI43%SING PO 1108505 ABAG POWE~ PURC}L~ING PO 1108506 ~J3AG POWER EURC}{ASING PO 1108504 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 1108503 ~23AG POWER pS'NC}rASING PO 5606620 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 5708510 03/28/03 720 03/28/03 88 03/28/03 2179 03/28/03 2179 Apel, Marj orie 950 1020 599945 03/28/03 1066 1020 599945 03/28/03 1066 TOTAL CHECK BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308840 BAY AREA SHELVING INC 1108830 BIGGS CA~RDOSA ASSOCIATES 2709430 BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES 2709430 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRI 5208003 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRI 5208003 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... B.C~DS/RIDDELL & SCHM SRIPPING CONTAINER MARCH2003 STATEMENT ~CH2003 STATEMENT Nt~CH2003 STATEMENT N~RCH2003 STATEMENT MARCH2003 STATEMENT ~CH2003 STATEMENT MA-RCH2003 STATEMENT M3~RCH2003 STATEMENT ~C~62003 STATEMENT MA-RCH2003 STATEMENT DEPOSIT FOR 5/01 WATER DELIVERY A~ DIS M~CH2003 MAINTENANCE M~C~2003 PLANT C~tRE M.C~G/SPRG LUNCH Refund: Check - 0rinda FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SHELVING 8827 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR EECYCLABLES FE82003 EECYCLABLES DEC2002 S;LLE S TA~ 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 1 -500.00 202.00 35.00 47.62 315.38 1078.49 50.90 201.72 105.19 1750.80 620.57 100.00 300.00 160.00 130.00 590.00 35.00 45.00 10.92 13.64 24.56 23.38 665.74 2304.50 351.00 2655.50 433.60 99.90 533.50 RUN BATE 03/27/03 TIME 09:09:38 - FINANCIkL ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~ ECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" CASH ACCT C~ECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599946 03/28/03 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 599946 03/26/03 1476 CA2qNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 599946 03/28/03 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 1107301 1020 599946 03/28/03 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 599946 03/28/03 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 599946 03/28/03 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599947 03/28/03 2232 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110 1020 599947 03/28/03 2232 CA/{IAGA, LOURDES 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599948 03/28/03 1460 TONI CAP~EIRO 6104800 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 1101000 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 1104000 1020 599949 03/26/03 149 CASR 1101000 1020 599949 08/28/03 149 CAS~ 1103300 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 1104000 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 1101201 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 C~H 1104300 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 1104510 --nO 599949 03/28/05 149 CASH 1107301 3 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 1106601 1020 599949 03/25/03 149 CASH 2204010 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 2204011 1020 599949 03/28/03 149 CASH 6109856 TOTAL CHECK 1020 999960 03/28/03 152 CEB:CONTINDING EDUCATION 1101500 1020 599951 03/25/03 M2003 CEEF - CLIP 1101000 1020 599952 03/28/03 2908 CENTURy GP~APHICS 5606620 1020 599953 03/28/03 1057 1020 599953 03/28/03 1057 TOTAL CHECK CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110 CERIDIAS BENEFITS SERVIC 110 1020 599954 03/28/03 1156 CHA 110 1020 899955 03/28/03 M CH~, HON YEU 580 1020 599956 03/26/03 M CHING, RICHARD 580 1020 599957 03/28/03 M2003 COFAM - DOCENT GROUP TOU 5506549 1020 599958 03/28/03 178 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110 1020 599959 03/28/03 1606 COLOUR SHOPPE DRS&PERIES 1108511 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT DESGN RE~ R~21005 0.00 965.58 DESGN REVW R#20739 0.00 330.00 DESGN REVW R~21005 0.00 14.42 DESGN REVW R#21165 0.00 220.00 DESGN REVW R#8816 0.00 330.00 DESGN REVW R~20241 0,00 220.00 O.OO 2100.00 GARNSMNT/CARIAGA 0.00 306.50 GA~RNS~TT/CARIAGA 0.00 103.84 0.00 410.34 WEB UPDATES 0.00 1236.95 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0.00 45.58 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0.00 24.46 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0.00 4.87 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0.00 36.85 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0.00 61.29 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0.00 19.30 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0,00 7.12 PETTY CASH 3/18-3/26 0,00 10.40 CA C.DISCVRY 3RD ED 5TH ANNVRSY M.CHANG STAFF UNIFOR~4S *FLEX DEP/240125 *FLEX HLTH/240125 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .gO 0.00 0.00 0.00 CEA Refund: Check - SPRING Refund: Check - Return 3/27/LEGION OF HONOR E7013599 CUSTOM MINI BLINDS 60.99 50.00 3599.04 349.94 522.42 872.36 139.85 72.00 300.00 640.00 596.80 1562.37 RUN DATE 03/27/03 TIME 09:09:38 - FINASCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 ACCOL~ING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBL~SEMEh~I FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact~rans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599960 03/28/03 2899 CPRS DISTRICT IV 1101065 1020 599961 03/28/03 197 ~C FL~DING, LLC 1101500 1020 599962 03/28/03 1407 CLUING HENDERSON TIRE 6308840 1020 599963 03/28/03 191 CUPERTINO C}~ER OF COM 2204011 1020 599964 03/28/03 191 C~]PERTINO C~BER OF COM 1101000 1020 599965 03/28/03 1973 THE CUPERTINO HISTORICAL 1107200 1020 599966 03/28/03 1579 1020 599966 03/28/03 1579 TOT~tL C~4ECK C~JPERTINO LOC-N-STOR LLC 1108503 C~3PERTINO LOCoN-STOR LLC 1108501 1020 599967 03/28/03 2628 C~3S~3~N CONSTRUC~ION COM 1108303 1020 599968 03/28/03 2516 D.C.P~%RCO ENGINEERING, I 4209216 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/26/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/26/02 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 208 1020 599970 03/28/03 208 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 699970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 I020 599970 03/28/03 209 1020 599970 03/28/03 209 TOTAL CHECK DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1106501 DE ANZA SERVICES INC .1106502 DE ANZ~ SERVICES INC 5708510 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108507 DE ;%NZA SERVICES INC 1108509 DE ANZ~ SERVICES INC 1108506 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504 DE ~NZA SERVICES INC 1108508 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108315 DE ~-NZA SERVICES INC 1108302 DE ~NZA SERVICES INC 1108314 DE A~ZA SERVICES INC 1108504 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606620 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606640 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504 DE A/~ZA SERVICES INC 1108507 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108509 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504 DE ARZA SERVICES INC 1108511 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108505 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108407 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108303 DE kNZA SERVICES INC 1108503 1020 599971 03/28/03 676 DEPARTMENT OF ~3STICE 1104510 1020 599972 03/28/03 1242 I020 599972 03/28/03 1242 TOTAL CHECK DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1101031 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1101040 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... S~J~ES TAD( AMOUET YAK ATTACK 4/12 0.00 220.00 RENVT APRIL03 70olD-CU 0.00 4569.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC 0.00 160.63 TEEN LEADEESEIP EXPS 0.00 27.42 LEG SL~IT 4/11 JA34ES 0.00 30.00 20 COPIES 0.00 300.00 %G-33 APRIL03 RENT 0.00 217.00 ~G-34 APRIL2003 RENT 0.00 217.00 0.00 434.00 FENCES MEM/VARIAN PEK 0.00 1655.00 STRUC?.NGIhrSER SERV 0.00 2700.00 JANITORIAL MARCH2003 0.00 2858.65 JANITORIAL MARCH2003 0.00 1649.17 J;kNITORIAL 5L~]~CH2003 0.00 269- J~/q ITORIAL ~t~RCR2003 0.00 268 JANITORIAL MARCR2003 0.00 1385.66 JANITORIAL blARCH2003 0.00 343.41 J;%NITORIAL ~%RCR2003 0.00 6182.68 J~NITORI]~L bt~RCR2003 0.00 140.13 JANITORIltL NL%RCESO03 0.00 739.71 J~2~ITORIAL M~%RCH2003 0.00 739.71 JANITORIAL ~[ARCH2003 0.00 4438.26 SPEC SERV WOOD FLOOR 0.00 525.00 J~i~ITORIAL M~J~2003 0.00 446.18 JANITORI~tL N~s~R2003 0.00 446.19 CARPETS 3/4 SOCIAL P34 0.00 100.00 CARPETS 3/3 CUPTNO 934 0.00 300.00 SPEC SERV DAY CARE 0.00 295.00 SEPC SERV P.PRK DC~d{E 0.00 270.00 SPEC SERV QC~ DCARE 0.00 350.00 SPEC SERV CREEKSIDE 0.00 280.00 JANITORIkL MARCH2003 0.00 3500.12 JANITORIAL MARCH2003 0 . 00 1004 . 89 JANITORIAL MARCH2003 0.00 1479 . 42 JANITORIAL MARCH2003 0.00 1988.75 0.00 34639.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FINGERPRINTING FEB03 B.CARDS/S.TING RPL CK 598503 160.00 57.21 105.93 16' R~JN [~ATE 03/27/03 TIME 09:09:38 - FIN3%NCIAL ACCOL~TING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- qCTION CRITERIA: transacs.~rans_date between ,,03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASE ACCT CEECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 4 AMOUNT 1020 598973 03/28/03 M2003 1020 599974 03/28/03 228 1020 599975 03/28/05 239 1020 599975 03/28/03 239 1020 599975 03/28/03 239 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599976 03/28/03 242 1020 599977 03/28/03 242 1020 599978 03/28/03 243 1020 599979 03/28/03 251 1020 599979 03/28/03 251 1020 599979 03/28/03 251 1020 599979 03/28/0S 251 I020 599979 03/28/03 251 1020 599979 03/28/03 251 --9 599979 03/28/03 251 ~ CHECK 1020 599980 1020 599981 1020 599981 TOTAL CHECK 03/28/03 M2003 03/28/03 260 03/28/03 260 1020 599982 03/28/03 262 1020 599983 03/28/03 268 1020 599984 03/28/03 274 1020 599984 03/28/03 274 1020 599984 03/28/03 274 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599985 1020 599986 1020 599986 TOTAL CHECK 03/28/03 2905 03/28/03 281 03/28/03 281 1020 599987 03/28/03 291 1020 599988 03/28/03 1741 ~q 599989 03/28/03 298 DISNEYI~ 5806349 DUEAY'S TIRE SERVICE INC 6308840 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1108830 ELECTRIC3%L DISTRIBUTORS 1108830 ELECTRIC3%L DISTRIBUTORS 1108830 EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEFT 110 EMPLOkq~tENT DEVSL DEPT 110 EMPLO~4ENT DEVSLOPMENT 110 EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315 EVAMS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108303 SV~NS WEST VALLSY SPRAY 1108315 EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315 EV~/qS WEST V~LLSY SPP~Y 1108314 EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAy 1108302 EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315 F U H S D 1101000 FEDEP. AL EXPRESS COEP 110 FEDER~ EXPRESS CORF 4239222 FIRST PLACE INC 1101031 FOSTER BROS SECURITY SYS 1108507 FRY'S ELECTRONICS 1108303 FRY'S ELECTRONICS 1108312 FRY'S ELECTRONICS 1108315 GOLDEN TOUCH LARDSCAPING 1108314 GOVCONNECTION, INC. 6104800 GRAINGER INC 6308840 40 TICKETS (2 DAYS) BRS~ REPAIR 8844 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUNC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 4T~ QTR 2002/PIT ADTL SDI/776-5260~0 TURF SPRAY CREEKSIDE BANK BEETLE/~IREE OKS BARK BEETLE/JOLLY~t~ BANK BEETLE/M~MORIAL BARK BEETLS/JOLL~ BARK BSETLE/MCCLELI~ TURF SPRAY JOLLY~ M.C~G/CRS~B FEED COURIER SERVICE CO~/RIEER SERVICE COPA PLAQUE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 8821 SUPPLIES 8811 SUPPLIES 8843 REPAIRS FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC PAMTS/SUPPLIES 8836 JAM,FES,MS~R ORCKARDS PUBLISHER 2000 M/~4OTH FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 2770.00 0.00 791.42 0.00 31.04 0.00 12.91 0.00 219.88 0.00 263.83 0.00 17215.62 0.00 6.98 0.00 919.02 0.00 3500,00 0.00 500.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 3500.00 0.00 9050.00 0,00 30.00 0.00 14.58 0.00 14.58 0.00 29.16 0.00 78.48 0.00 34.64 0.00 286.81 0.00 118.95 0.00 536.78 0.00 942.54 0.00 150.00 0.00 39.54 0.00 484.20 0.00 523.74 0.00 2571.00 0.00 942.86 0.00 I83.53 RUN ~TE 03/27/03 TIME 09;09:38 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CEECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMEN~ FD1FD SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599989 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599990 03/28/03 2630 1020 599991 03/28/03 2546 1020 599991 03/28/03 2546 TOTAL CHECK I020 599992 03/26/03 1235 1020 599992 03/28/03 1235 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599993 03/28/03 2906 1020 599994 03/28/03 2612 1020 599995 03/28/03 1898 1020 599996 03/28/03 343 1020 599997 03/28/03 M2003 1020 599998 03/28/03 1981 1020 599998 03/28/03 1981 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599999 03/28/03 M 1020 600000 03/28/03 2818 1020 600001 03/28/03 385 1020 600002 03/28/03 1599 1020 600003 03/28/03 1175 1020 600003 03/28/03 1175 TOTAL CHECK 1020 600004 03/28/03 M2003 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. PI/ND/DEPT 03/28/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108830 GREGORY B, BP~AGG & A~SOC 6204550 GEORGE T~OMA~ MCCARROLL 5606620 GEORGE TEOMAS MCC~ROLL 1108503 HIGFIM~K LIFE INSUR~CE 110 EIGHM~ARK LIFE INSOI~ANCE 6414570 TONY VASQUEZ 1104510 RONALD HOGUE 5506549 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108321 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 2NSTI~"3TE FOR 1101500 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTR 1108406 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONq~R 2708405 IP~IAN FEDERATED WOMEN' 580 JAECO 1108504 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 6308840 M~AGED HEkLTH NETWORK I 1104510 MCWEORTER & yOLTNG 1106647 MCWHORTER & YOUNG 1106647 METRO MOBILE CO~NII/NICATI 6308840 MINTON'S LUMBER 5606620 MISSION VALLEY FORD INC 6308840 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSNLAN 1107302 PAGE 5 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALEE TAX AMOUNT FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC 0.0O 50.78 0.00 234.31 WRKCOMP FEE 2/03-2/04 0.00 2000.00 REPLACE WATER VALVES 0.00 2150.00 RUN DATE 03/27/03 TINtE 09:09:38 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: -- ECTION CRITERIA: 9/o3 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2803" CASE ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 600010 03/28/03 2726 ** MOSS & BAR~IETT 1101031 1020 600011 03/28/03 465 MOUNTAIN VIEW GAP~EN CEN 1108315 1020 600012 03/28/03 M2003 MOUNTAIN VIEW-LOS ALTOS 5706510 1020 800013 03/28/03 M McMahon, Elizabeth 550 1020 1020 1020 TOTAL CHECK 600014 03/28/03 2579 600015 03/28/03 474 600015 03/28/03 474 NATIONAL AUDIO-VISUAL SU 5506549 NATIONAL BUSINESS FL~IT 1106265 NATIONAL BUSINESS FUP. NIT 1106265 1020 600016 03/28/03 475 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RE 1108314 1020 600017 03/28/03 302 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPEN 110 1020 600018 03/28/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 600818 03/28/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 600018 03/28/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 600018 03/28/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT ~'~L CHECK 1104300 5806449 5806249 1108101 1020 600019 03/28/03 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 1020 600020 03/28/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 600020 03/28/09 833 P E R S 110 1020 600020 03/28/03 833 P S R S 1020 600020 03/28/03 833 P S R S 110 1020 600020 03/28/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 600020 03/28/09 833 P E R E TOTAL CHECK 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 800021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 09/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 608021 03/28/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1020 600021 03/28/03 2892 PACIFIC BELL TOTAL CHECK 1101500 1108505 5708510 1108503 1108504 6104800 1108501 1108501 1101500 5708510 5606620 1108504 1108505 PAGE 6 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT FR3~CHISE R2~WL/LEGAL 0.00 744.70 SUPPLIES 0.00 121.13 SHIPPING CONTAINER 0.00 1000.00 Refund: Check - DaVinc 0.00 45.00 SUPPLIES 18074 0.00 82.00 MARTIN EXECUTIVE L RET 0,00 1153.67 MARTIN EXECUTIVE L RET 0.00 1318.70 0.00 2472.37 RENTAL 3/13-4/09 *NAT'L DEF OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES *PERS BYBK PERS SPEC PERS EMPLY PERS BUYBK *PEAS BYBK PERS 1959 3/07-4/08 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 3/07-4/06 0.00 91.63 0.00 17932.49 0.00 4,97 0.00 24,88 0.00 73.44 0.00 238.71 0.00 342.00 0.00 603.40 0.00 462.65 0,00 116.09 0.00 25505,22 0.00 37.52 0.00 180.14 0,00 119.04 0.00 26420.66 0.00 242.72 0.00 242.72 0.00 242.72 0.00 242.72 0.00 489.41 0.00 257.18 0.00 54.64 0.00 88.55 0.00 88.55 0,00 88.56 0.00 88.56 0.00 88.55 0.00 88.55 0.00 88.56 0,00 242,72 0.00 2630.71 RUN DATE 03/27/03 TIME 09:09:39 - FINf{NCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCODNTING PERIOD~ 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 600022 03/28/03 1699 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC { 4239222 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 518 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/D3 515 1020 800024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 518 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 1020 600024 03/28/03 515 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 PACIFIC WEST SEC~ITY IN 1108501 PACIFIC WEST SECUEITY IN 5708510 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108505 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 PACIFIC WEST SEC~ITY IN 1108501 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108511 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108511 PACIFIC WEST SECURIT~Z IN 5708510 PACIFIC WEST SECL~ITY IN 5708510 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108508 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108508 PACIFIC WEST SEC~3RI~%'IN 1108507 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 PACIFIC WEST SECI/RITY IN 1108506 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108506 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108506 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108505 PACIFIC WEST SEC~ITY IN 1108505 PACIFIC WEST SEC~UrRITYIN 1108508 PACIFIC WEST SEC~ITY IN 1108505 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108503 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108511 PACIFIC WEST SEC"JRITY IN 1108503 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108504 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108504 PACIFIC WEST SEC"JRITY IN 1108504 PACIFIC WRST SECURITY IN 1108503 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108503 PACIFIC WEST SECNRITY IN 1108503 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108503 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108502 PACIFIC WEST SEC~TRITY IN 1108502 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108502 PACIFIC WEST 5ECt/RITY IN 1108501 1020 600025 03/28/03 526 1020 600025 03/28/03 526 TOTAL CHECK PENINSULA DIGITAL INLAGIN 1108101 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 1108601 1020 600026 03/28/03 M2003 PENINStrLADIVISION 1101000 1020 600027 03/28/03 533 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX LIBP~Y/PWR/GAS S.0FF 0.00 AMOUNT 5776.00 SECURITY/FIRE MAY03 0.00 124.00 ACCESS 5YS ~[AY03 0.00 219.00 SECURITY/FIRE JIINE03 0.00 136.00 SECURITY/FIRE JSJNE03 0.00 124.00 SERV CALL 3/06 0.00 250.00 ACCESS SYS APRIL03 0.00 219.00 ACCESS SYS JUNE03 0,00 219.00 SECURITY/FIRE MAY03 0.00 70.00 SECURITY/FIRE JUNE03 0.00 70,00 SECURITY/FIRE APRIL03 0.00 136.00 SEC~ITY/FIRE MAY03 0.00 136.00 SECURITY SYSM M~Y03 O,O0 37.00 SECIIRITY SYSM JUNE03 0.00 37.00 SECURITY SYSM APRIL03 0.00 39.00 FIRE/M.VISTA APR03 0.00 165.00 SECl3RITY SYSM MAYO3 0.00 39.00 FIRE/M.VISTA N~AY03 0.00 165.00 SECURITY SYSM JIINS03 0.00 39.00 FIRE/M.VISTA JI/NE03 0.00 165.00 SECI/RITY/FIRE APRIL03 0.00 46.00 SECL~ITY/FIRE MAY03 0.00 4 SECURITY/FIRE JL~E03 0.00 ~ SECURITY APRIL03 0.00 46.00 SECURITY MAY03 0.00 46.00 SECIIRITY SYSM APRIL03 0,00 37.00 SECL~ITY ~JNE03 0.00 46.00 SECURITY/FIRE MAY03 0.00 81.00 SECl3RITY/FIRE APRIL03 0.00 70.00 SECL~ITY SYS JL~E03 0.00 37.00 FIRE SYSTEM APRIL03 0.00 199.00 FIRE SYSTEM MAY03 0.00 199.00 FIRE SYSTEM J~NE03 0.00 199.00 SECURITY SYS APRIL03 0.00 37.00 SEC~3RITY SYS MAY03 0.00 37.00 SECURITY/FIRE APRIL03 0.00 81,00 SECURITY/FIRE J13NE03 0.00 81.00 SEC~3RITY SYSTEM APR03 0.00 55.00 SECURITY SYSTEM MAY03 0.00 55.00 SEC"JRITY SYSTEM Jl3N03 0.00 55.00 SEC~IRITY/FIRE APRIL03 0.00 124.00 0.00 4012.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 49.53 SUPPLIES 0.00 49.82 0.00 99.05 LCC SACR3~MENTO 5/15 0.00 60.00 PERS LTC/2405 0.00 23' "O R~/N ~TE 03/27/03 TIME 09=09=39 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 C"HECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- ECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" 1020 600028 03/28/03 2278 1020 600029 03/28/03 571 1020 600030 03/28/03 1406 1020 600030 03/28/03 1406 TOTAL CHECK 1020 600031 03/28/03 575 1020 600032 03/28/03 944 1020 600032 03/28/03 944 TOTAL CHECK 1020 600033 03/28/03 581 1020 600034 03/28/03 2406 1020 600034 03/28/09 2406 1020 600034 03/28/03 2406 1020 600034 03/28/03 2406 1020 600034 03/28/03 2406 QUA. LLS, RALPH 1108001 P~AINBOW PACING SYSTEM 5806449 P~AINES CHEVORLET 6308840 RAINES CHEVORLET 6308840 RSCYCAL SUPPLY 5208003 REHABILITATION RESOURCES 1101200 REHABILITATION RESOURCES 1104300 RELIkBLE 1107301 RELIANCE MET~tLCENTER 1108501 RELIANCE META. LCENTER 1108501 RELIANCE METALCENTER 1108501 RELIANCE METALCENTER 6308840 RELIANCE METALCENTER 1108501 REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MARK 1108503 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 6104600 SAN FR~CISCO ELEVATOR 1108501 THE MERCURY NEWS 1106265 S~/gTA CLJ~COUNTy 110 SA/~TA CL~ COUI~Y LIBRA 1101040 S~2~TA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5806349 SERVICE STATION SYSTEMS, 6308840 SILICON VALLEY MANUFACIU 1101000 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 6308840 SPOT WATER MANAGEMENT 5606640 SPOT WATER MANAGEMENT 5606640 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2708403 STATE OF C~tLIFOR/{IA 2109612 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 8 AMOUNT WASHINGTON DC 3/7-I~ 0.00 1750.23 SUPPLIES 17237 0.00 147.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 13.99 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 278.78 0.00 292.77 RECYCLE TAG AND BOX 0.00 1536.32 WRKST EVALUATIONS 0.00 221.61 WRKST EVALUATIONS 0.00 443.22 0.00 664.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 193.40 SUPPLIES 0.00 358.41 SUPPLIES 0.00 27.01 SUPPLIES 0.00 156.93 SUPPLIES 0.00 331.10 SUPPLIES 0.00 559.26 0.00 1432.71 YEARLY MAINTENANCE 0.00 493.00 J.SEVER3%NCE W/E 3/14 0.00 1008.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 467.67 RENEWAL 3/23-6/21 0.00 49.26 V ORTEGA 563212780 0.00 352.62 EXTRA LIBRY NRS 02/03 0.00 213892.00 D~.NCE 3/14 0.00 433.10 LABOR/REPAIRS 0.00 308.75 REG. SL~IT 4-7/JAMES 0.00 35,00 SUPPLIES 0.00 680.54 RECONSTRUCT #9 TEE 0.00 5200.00 REMVL/CONSTRUCT #2 BK 0.00 8100.00 O.O0 13300.00 T~J~LY/CURB,GLrfTERS,SW 0.00 38596.95 TALLY/EMRGY E.DP~IN 0.00 6061.50 0.00 44658.85 Rl31q ~ATE 03/27/03 TIME 09:09:39 - FINANCI~ ACCOUNTING 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCO~gTING PERIOD: 9/03 CNECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FU~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" 1020 600047 03/28/03 677 1020 600048 03/28/03 529 1020 600049 03/28/03 1825 1020 600050 03/28/03 696 1020 600051 03/28/03 M2003 1020 600052 03/28/03 698 1020 600052 03/28/03 698 TOTAL CHECK 1020 600053 03/28/03 700 1020 600053 03/28/03 700 TOTAL CHECK 1020 600054 03/28/03 701 1020 600054 03/26/03 70i 1020 600054 03/28/03 701 TOTAL CHECK 1020 600055 03/28/03 1013 1020 600056 03/28/03 M2003 1020 600057 03/28/03 1763 1020 600058 03/28/03 362 1020 600059 03/28/03 M2003 1020 600060 03/28/03 1993 1020 600061 03/28/03 724 1020 600062 03/28/03 2288 1020 600063 03/28/03 1154 1020 600064 03/28/03 2584 1020 600065 03/28/03 736 1020 600066 03/28/03 766 1020 600067 03/28/03 768 1020 600068 03/28/03 1131 STATE STREET B;%NK & TRUS 110 SI/NGARD PENTA~LATION, INC 6104800 SUPERIOR FRICTION 6308840 TAPCO SUPPLY 1108504 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108315 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108321 TARGET STORES 5706450 T~2tGET STORES 5706450 TARGET STORES 5806349 T3uX COLLECTOR 1101200 THE ROASTED COFFEE BEAN 4209117 THEATERF~NINC 5806349 JOHN THOMPSON 5606620 TP~CON 2003 1108201 TRE~URER OF ~J~AMEDA COU 110 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 6308840 UNITED STATES LEGENDS, I 2708404 LTNITED WAY OF S;%NTA CL~ 110 UNIVERSAL DIALOG, INC. 1103300 VALLEY OIL COMPAN~ 6308840 WEST BAY S~qJMP REMOVAL I 1108408 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTE 1101500 CIDDY WORDELL 1107301 PAGE 9 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT *PERS DEF 0.00 3315.93 INFSEDEV~INT MAINTNC 0.00 1710.35 BRAEE P~RTS 8840 0.00 278.95 SUPPLIES 0.00 89.99 AIRFARE S.DIEGO 0.00 215.50 MONTA VISTA RECREATION 0.00 6700.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTP~CT 0.00 81946.73 0.00 88646.73 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 973.34 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 195.37 0.00 1168.71 CHIPS 25132 0.00 30.00 SUPPLIES 22575 0.00 39.74 SUPPLIES 17223 0.00 72.90 R~/N ~A~E 03/27/03 03/27/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- ECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "03/24/2003" and "03/28/2003" FLrgrD - ~10 - GENEP~ FLR~D C~H ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VEArDOR ............. FLr~/DEPT 03/28/03 M Walczak, Rosemary 550 03/28/03 799 Z~N]CER ROAD IJ~qDFILL 5208003 03/28/03 799 Z~KER RO~/) I~FILL 5208003 03/26/03 802 ZEP M3kNUFACTT3RING COMPAN 6308840 TOT~-L REPORT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... Refund: Check - Austra PAGE 10 AMOUNT 0.00 475.00 0.gO 244.65 0.00 11603.67 0.00 11848.32 0.00 172.55 0.00 615461.17 0.O0 615461.17 0.00 615461.17 RI/N ~%TE 03/27/03 TIME 09:09:39 - FIN~2~CI~kL ACCOUNTING RESOLUTION NUMBER Oq-fi[rl DRA~T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON March 28, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL $ 424,666.10 Less Employee Deductions $(120,227.37) NET PAYROLL. $ 304.438.7~3 Payroll check numbers issued 66532 through 66763 Void check number(s) 66520-66531 Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of ^pr±l ,2003, by the following vote: Vote AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Members of the City Council APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Revenue/Expenditure Trends February revenues continued to lag prior year receipts, prompting several downward adjustments in budget projections as part of the City's mid-year analysis. Year-to-date sales taxes are down 11.5% from the prior year; transient occupancy taxes are down 19% in same-hotel comparisons. Increased development volume within the Building and Planning departments continue to generate increases of 37% in Permits and Charges for Services from last year. Operating expenditures have increased 4.1% over the same period last year. Midyear budget adjustments approved by Council will be reflected in the Treasurer's report for March. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Treasurer's and Budget report for February 2003. Submi~ed by: Approved for submission: Deputy Treasurer David W. Knapp City Manager City of Cupertino Febuary 2003 I I I 'PROFIT/LOSS ACTIVITY DATE ADJUSTED MATURITY MARKET UNREALIL~I2 PURCHASE I MATURITY - DESCRIPTION REF YIELD COST VALUE VALUE SECURITIES MATURED/CALLED 12/16/02 06/16/0~: [~HLB~ 6k 3.40% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,501,458 1,458 08/02/01 02/07/05 FHLB(P) 6k 5.26% 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,588,983 88,983 11/26/02 05/26/06 FHLB© 6k 3.18% 1,000,000 1.000,000 1,000,904 904 SECURITIES PURCHASED I 02/12/03 05/12/06 'FHLB© 6k 3.05% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 02/13/03 09/26/06 FNMA(floater)©16k 2.25% 507,574 500,000 500,000 (7,574) CURRENT PORTFOLIO CASH 02/28/03 Cupertino National Bank 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 02/28/03 Greater Bay Trust Company ~ 0 0 0 0 CA [ [ ~ 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 CORPORATE] BONDS ~ 00 0 0 CORP -- 0 0 0 0 LAiF ~A I 02/28/03 State Pool ~f 1.95°A 13,221,859 13,221,859 13,221,859 0 MONEY MARKET FUNDS I 02/28/03 CupertinoNatl-Sweep account Sj 0.54°A 1,192,830 1,192,830 1,192,830 VIM 1,192,830 1,192,830 1,192,830 I MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS 07/09/93 04/15/07 FHLMC(P) 6k 6.90%1 393,072 387,959 406,196 13,124 08/01/01 08/01/05 FHLB(P) 6k 5.38% 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,522,439 22,439 t 09/30/93 05/15/08 FHLMC(P) 6k 6,62% 2,917,320 2,860,000 2,915,956 (1,364) 06/28/02 02/15/04 ?HLMC(P) 6k 2.71% 1,330,951 1,300,000 1,348,552 17,601 ~6k 2.80%, 1,313,459 1,300,000 1,334,302 20,843 06/28/02 04/15/04 FHLMC(P) 06/28/02 05/14/04 FNMA 6k 2.91% 1,342,396 1,300,000 1,365,753 23,357 ~ 06/28/02 03/15/04 FNMA 6k I 2.84% 1,325,881 1,300,000 1,345,744 19,864 06/28/02 09/15/04 FNMA 6k 3.12% 1,792,597 1,800,000 1,855,195 62,598 06/28/02 06/15/04 FNMA 6k 2.93% 1,201,043 I 1,200,000 1,224,629 23,585 06/28/02 11/01/04 ~I 6k 3.34% 682,293 650,000 700,528 18,236 06/28/02 11/17/03 FNMA 6k I 2.56% 2,040,204 2,000,000 I- 2,057,426 17,222 07/15/02 07/15/04 FNMA© 6k 3.15% 2,40~)}000 2,400,00~- 2,414,201 14,201 10/28/02 10/28/05 FHLB© 6k 3.30% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,002,399 2,399 01/03/03 01/03/06 FNMA© 6k 3.05% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,963 ] 963 01/28/03 07/28/06 FNMA© 6k 3.24% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,002,100 2,100 ~ 01/30/03 01/30/06 [FNMA(Iloater)© 6k 213% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,001,237 1,237 02/12/03 05/12/06 FHLB© ~6k 3.05% 1,000,000 i 1,000,000 1,002,372 02/13/03 09/26/06 FNMA(floater)© 6k 2.25%I 507,574 500,000 500,578 i (6,9961 MO i 23,746,790 23,497,959 I 24,000,569 251,407 US GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ~ 02/07/00 06/30/03 Treasu~yNo~-e 6a 5 38%~ 2,490,807 2,500,000 2,533,983 i 43,175 07/01/02 12/31/03 Tre~suryNote __ _ 6a__l' 325% 2,520,814 2,500,000 ~ 2,541,795 20,981 US I 5,011,621 5,000,000 ] 5,075,778 64,156 ITotal Managed Portfolio ;] i ___ 43,573,100 I 43¢312'649 I 43,891,036 t 315,564 Average Yield '- I [ 3'018.~~ Average Length to Maturity (in years) I - . I City of Cupertino Febuar ~ 2003 FRUST & AGENCY PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY DATE PURCHASE EERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: DESCRIPTION 07/27/01 I 03/31/03 Cupertino Natl(Kester Trust) Traffic Impactl Franklin Fiduciary Trust Total Trust & Agency Ported RESERVE PORTFOLIO 11/15/02 , Lease Payment Fund 10/15/02 LAIF Bond Account -'--.)Total_l Bond Reserve Portfolio MATURITY MARKET YIELD COST VALUE VALUE 2.02% 40,821 40,821 1.00% 19,100 19,100 59,921 1,767,804 0.69% 1,767,804 2.31% 15,867,722 15,867,722 17,635,526 40.821 19,100 59,921[ 59,921 1,767,804 5,867,722 17,635,526 17,635,526 PROFIT/LOSS 0 Mortgage Obligation 54% Investments by Type Managed Portfolio LAiF 30% 5.00% Rate of Return Comparison 4,50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 0.50% 0.00% 1/02 2/02 3/02 4/02 5/02 6/02 7/02 8/02 9/02 10/02 11/02 12/02 1/03 2/03 _~ LcAuulpFertino COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTMENT POLICY City of Cupertino February 28, 2003 Category Standard Comment Treasury Issues No limit Complies US Agencies (eg FHLMC) No limit Complies Medium Term Corporate Bonds/Notes 30% with A rating Complies LAIF $40 million Complies Money Market Funds 20% Complies Maximum Maturities 25% up to 15 years Complies (FHLMC at 7 yrs) " Remainder up to 5 years Complies Per lssuer Max 10% (except govts) Complies Bankers Acceptances 180 days & 40% Complies Commercial Paper 270 days & 25% Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% Complies Repurchase Agreements 365 days Complies Reverse Repurchase agreements Prohibited Complies City of Cupertino [ General Fund Bud~ge~ Report Actual Actual % of Budget 2/28/03 2001/02 Budget 2002/03 Budget YTD 02-28-02 YTD 02-28-03 Over/Under Analysis of Trends Taxes: Sales Tax 10,348,000 11,000,000 6,833,821 6,047,784 -17.53% Property Tax 3,789,000 3,700,000 1,811,4~3 ..... 2,__0_85,813 - 15.44% T_ranscient Occupancy 1,460,000 2,365,000 868,5291 939,680 -40.40% Collected ~hru Jan. Same hotel revenue down 19%. Utility Tax 2,699,000 2,880,000 1,468,_00_3 ..... 1,550,998 - 19.~% Franchise Fees 2,214,000 2,320,000 810,220 791,555 -48.82% Loss of cable modem franchise fees. Other Taxes 1,120,000 1,250,000 694,002 756,711 -9.19% Licenses and Permits 1,173,600 1,150,000 .... 7_-~5,820 1,046,792 36.54%-- Building pernfit revenues up $280,000 Use of Money & Property 1,544,500 1,400,000 1,167,467_ ..... !,_007,512 7.95% Yields down from 4.29 to 3.35% (21.9¥~-Jan. - Jan.) 1 nt~e.r_go~v_ ern~ ~e n_[al~ _ 3,319,041 3,549,079 2,351,623~ __ 2,520,116 6.51% Charges for S__ervices 429,100 381,250 208,}_7_~ __ 287,441 13.09% .__ Increase in street cost reimbursements Fines & Forfeitures 600,000 600,000 334,~_39_ ~274,809 -31.30% Other Revenue 80,000 15,817,600 57,324 t7,321,~219 64.26% Includes additional debt proceeds Total Revenue ~ ~ ~ ~ 11.92% 2002-03 Budget includes refinancing/library funding Operating Expenditures: Administrative 1,516,325 1,538,736 1,057,889 1,092,693 6.52% Law Enforcement 6,123,t81 6,274,494 4,061,235 4,174,990 -0.19% Community Service 652,882 747,602 474,747 480,192 -3.~}% Administrative Service 3,344,477 3,602,871 2,279,813 2,311,t48 -3.78% Recreation Service 1,946,332 2,331,981 1,152,446 1,369,889 -11.88% Community Development _r 4,0_4~,2_19 2,785,796 1,768,143 1,721,503 -7.31% _ Public Works 9,273,771 ..... ~_,~19_2,822 5,487,982 5,80:},35_7 __'5'32% Total Expenditures ~ 26.474.3~0~3. _ ~ ~ -3.95% Operating Transfers In 2,825,000 1,725,000 1,283,336 1,150,00_0 .... 0.00% Transfers Out -9,117,9211 -26,172,000_ -6,061,672 -17,258,000 -1.09% 12002-03 Budg~-ih~u~les transfers to CIP for New Library ~Operating Net Income/Loss ~ .4.508.374 I Revenue Comparison 20,000,000 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,00C 2,000,000 0 III YTD 02/28/02 mYTD 02/28/03 1 Sales Tax 2 Property Tax 3 TOT 4 Utility Tax 5 Franchise Fees 6 Other 7 Licenses & Permits 8 Money & Property 9 Intergovernmental 10 Charges for Services t 1 Fines & Forfeitures 12 Other Revenue 7,000,000 Expenditure Comparison 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Administrative 2 Law Enforcement 3 Community Service 4 Administrative Service 5 Recreation Service 6 Community Development 7 Public Works City of Cupertino [ I Summary of Budget Transfers 2/28/03 Budget Revenue Expenditure Description Acct# Adjustment Budget ] Budget 2002/03 ADOPTED BUDGET 46,570,000 67,065,000 Debt Refinancing/Issuance 15,665,000 2001/02 CARRYOVER: Encumbrances various 5,220,767' 5,220,76 ! Department carryovers various 537,770 537,770 Project carryovers various 11,434,531 11,434,531 REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS: Transcription Services - City Clerk 110-4811 2,600 2,600 Al~er school enrichment programs 580-4725 190,000 190,000 W/h funds in excess of settlemem, BFI 5204811 93,944 93,944 Traffic Study for Villa Serra Apts : 110-4553 26,250 26,250 PG&E Safe Tree Grant 110-4553 20,000 ' 20,000 ~BJA Block Grant 1104431 ~ _47,079 47,079 EXPENDi~TURE ADJUSTMENTS: Transcription Services - City Clerk , 1104300-7014 2,600 2,600 At~ar schoole~ichment programs 580-6349-7014 190,000 __ 190,000 Salary adj. - City Manager 110-1200-5501 7,719 7,719 .Salary adj. - City Attorney 10-1500-5501 7,470 7,470 Salary adj. - RDA 250-7304-5501 1,250 1,250 Traffic Study for Villa Serra Apts 110-8601-7014 26,250 26,250 Additional costs for trial case 110-1500-7075 20,000 i 20,000 PG&E Safe Tree Grant 110-8408-9100 20,000 20,000 BJA Block Grant 110-2402-7014 47,079 I 47,079 2002 0, ADJUSTED BUDGET ] I 62,614,"31 4,5 0,436 Capital Projects February 28, 2003 Fund Pro{# Description C/O eric ] C/O bud,qet Adopted chan,qe Total Bud,qet Encumbrance Expenditure Current Bal. !_~..0_ _ _9~.'(~ D~.,f~[tm~_n.~_[emed~ ................. 1_4:~2:_50_ ............ _0:?0 14 942.50 0 00 14 942 50 0 00 210 9612 Minor Storm Drain Improv 9,300.00 132,290.09 71,507 213,097.09 48,101.50 131,252.11 33,743.48 215 9620 Storm Drain Projects 0.00 1,024,304.32 ~ 75,000 1,099,304.32 7,900.00 43,703.39 1,047,700.93 270 9411 W.Stev Creek bike lane 0.00 20,965.00 20,965.00 20,965.00 270 941; S.Stelfing bike lane 0.00 24,712.00 24,712.00 24,712.00 270 9413 De Anza bike lane 0.00 40,523.00 40,523.00 40,523.00 270 9430 Stay Canyon Rd widening 1,078,616.99 25,510.30 1,104,127.29 761,971.42 332,040.64 10,115.23 _.~70 _~.zL31 ~.¥_Crk/_.~!a_[~ey_T_~..m_._edifi_o_~,_t~D_rJ___1.'[.~.3_1~0.89 0.00 ............. 11,330.89 0.00 4,632.58 6698.31 270 9432 Hmetd bel[eville T/S medif. 0.0~ ..... ~-6.00 ........................... 751'666'.~00 .............................. 270 9435 Neighborhoed t raf calming 8,230.00 6,120.00 100,000 114,350.00 1,292.05 9,526.77 103,531.18 270 9436 Stay Crk Trail Bike facilities 0.00 30,218.00 30,219.00 30,219.0¢ 270; 9438 'vlifler Ave bike faciliUes 0.00 131,006.50 131,006.50 131,006.5£ 27£ 94412 Atolfe bike facilitiy improv 11,890.43 122,776.68 134,667.11 2,942.7(2 131,724.41 27(2 9441 9ike detection enhancement 0.00 19,659.00 19,659.00; 19,659.0¢ 27C 9443 ~ollinger Rd bike facility imprev. 86,119.35 249,840.52 335,959.87 131,642.0S 14,374.4~c 189,943 ;'~' .27.~ _..._94_'~ _p~ _A~_z.~St~ev_..C~Z r ess .w_ ~.[k_ e~_ h~ ........ _0~.0~)~`- _ ~p_0., 000 ._0..0_ ..................... ~(_2. 917_, 000 0.0C 0.00 27(2 9447 Mary Avenue gateway 33,258.59 156,841.62 (50,006~ "--~6;'i'b-o.~ -'-~7~0.,i~ ..... ~/;~'~.6-~ ...... 270 9448 Foothill bird bike lanes 86,450.00 99,341.95 185,791.95 0.00 91,602.00 94,189.95 270 9449 Mary Avenue Footbridge 0.00 389,877.15 633,864 1,023,741.15 0.00 0.00 1,023,741.15 270 9450 Pavement Management 67,300.00 29.45 750,000 817,329.45 29,000.00 155,226.16 633,103.2~ 270 953 Ramp meter signa~ 280/85 389,233.43 80,209.00 469,442.43 396,872.90 2,360.53 70,209.0C~ 270 9532 SR85/Stev Crk T/S modification 0.00 49,378.49 49,378.49 49,378.49 270 970 Sidewalk gaps unimprv areas 0.00 i 0.00 75 000 00 75 000.00 ............................................................................................................. 75,000.00 270 9702 Citywide bike parking facilities 0.00 51,789.00 51,789.00 ........................................ 280 9213 McClellan Ranch bidg improv. 0.00 211,652.00 211,652.00 211,652 00 420 910~ Park Renovations 0.00 72,545.84 i 72,545.84 48,626.60 23,918.40 420 9113 Stay Crk trail maeterplen 0.00 6,260.70 6,260.70 6,260.70 420 9115 Skate Park 0.00 401,953.40 (220,000.00) 181,953.40 181,953.40 420 9116 San Thomas trail improvements 21,807.60 427,101.90 184,000.00 632,909.50 74,932.46 359,497.07 198,479.97 ~.~0_ _ 91~!?. Ste_v..~_rk_ Tra!!..r~?er p_l~_n..~.u~_dy 74,734.84 20 976.00 95 710.84 16 036.49 58 698.35 20,976.00 ................................................................................................. 420 9118 Union Pacific RR trail 0.00 4,313.87 4,313.87 4,313.87 420 9119 Portal/Wilson park improvement 0.00 564,060.05 564,060.05 523,56%64 2,935.72 37,562.69 420 9121 Memorial park softball field impv. 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 420 9216 Service center expanison 41,888.00 67,831.00 109,719.00 41,888.00 17,831 00 50,000.00 420 9219 Animal control facility 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 420i 9223 $ivic center improvements 0.00 199,953.03 1,800,000.00 500,000.00 2,499,953.03 52,000.00 70.11 2,447,882.92 ...~2(: _~_4 3ivi_~.c?nte[ ~!~a in~p~?_v.~_m~ents___ 0.00 63 979.75 900 000 00 963,979.75 21 000.00 5 857 03 937,122.72 .............................................................................................. 42£ 952~1 DeAnzaJStev C reek ar terial mgmt 0.00 21,849.t3 21,849.13 21,849.13 42C 9527 -tornesteed/TantauT/S upgrade 3,733.00 172.15 3,905.15 3,733.00 0.00 172.1.r, 42(2 952E 280,SNolfe traffic safety improv. 302,574.31 82,434.64 385,008.95 53,752.78 250,821.53 80,434.64 420 953(2 Phase ~11Hmstd arterial m~mt 0.00 43,540.90 43,540.90 2,500.00 41,040.90 Capital Projects February 28, 2003 Fund Pro~# Description C/O enc C/O bud,qst Adopted chan,qe Total Budqet Encumbrance Expenditure Current Bal. 42_0 __9. ~_3__3 .~_[_ .e~. q..l:_E. [~..T_/_~.[i~ h_!~ ......................... .1_?~5_9.~8~. _~2.~1 ,_036.00 ..... 271,4_9_5~ 8_6 .... _3_3~2._09_ ...... !. (~ ,_~1_2.~: -~ ~. 2~61,036.0_0 420 9534 Advanced ITS De Anza bird 30,055.47 675,536.00 705,591.47 11,090.17 18,988.78 675,512.52 420 9535 Adaptive traf control system 635,356.48 300,561.00 935,917.48 556,067.13 79,289.35 300,561.00 420 9536 Stelling corridor T/S upgrade 0.00 4,901.97 4,901.97 4,901.97 420 953: Bubb corridor T/S upgrade 0.00 3,063.72 3,063.72 3,063.72 420 9538 Pruneridge corrider T/S upgrade 0.00 4,901.97 4,901.97 4,901.97 420 9539 Walfe/Pruneridge T/S upgrade 0.00 4,595.58 4,595.58 4,595.58 ._.4_~ .._ _9541 Sch~ trafi~ic calming measure 1~6_3.t_4._3.D:~_-9 ........ _2..!.?_~_2_:-9_5_ ................................. !.~,_3_~.3_:~ ....... _2.~.,?~_3.. _6g......._~_3.'~?:~.._ .0_8. ...... _21,902.95 420 9544 Safe routes CHS 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 420 9545 T/S upgrades vadous locations 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 420 9546 Traf operation center facilities 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 420 9547 Yallow peal LED T/S upgrades 0.00 0.00 140,000.00 140,000.00 140,000.00 420 9548 Traf st walkability mods facility 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5,000.00 95,000.00 420 9703 Apple public ad 100,000.00 (100,000.00) 0.00 0.00 .._~.2_~ ___-92~_~ _Li~br~ ?ns_tru~tien_ ................... ].,'~_,~_2.~._7_2. __1_t_7~q,_8_66.O~ 17.,_607~,00__0.~00_ .... _21,046,386.7~5_ _1,~_5_9,8_71.6~5- ..~.,_8_7.~,.~3_~:~5_ 17,809,88~).65 424 9210 Senior Center Expansion 10,952.00 34,483.47 45,435.47 2,500.00 12,748.60 30,186.87 425 9313 Four Season Corner 0.00 412,074.95 662,000.00 1,074,074.95 63,327.30 64,677.83 946,069.82 425 9314 Four Season Ar[ Sculpture 0.00 143,788.00 143,788.00 143,788.00 0.00 426 9212 Sports Crt. fitness expansion 0.00 1,629,918.91 711,000.00 2,340,918.91 1,754,328.49 224,688.08 361,902.34 560 9105 Blackberry Farm 0.00 451,882.65 75,000.00 526,882.65 0.00 22,678.67 504,203.98 560 9112 BBF master plan study 34,000.00 116,000.00 150,000.00 34,286.76 41,531.11 74,182.13 Total ~4,851,185.14 12,004,530.53 24,402,371.00 (570,000.00) 40,688,086.67 6,186,466.60 4,039,910.47 30,461,709.60 CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 Phone (408) 777-3312 Fay (,iOR) 777-~266 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER. AGENDA DATE SUBJECT AND ISSUE Application for Alcoholic Beverage License. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Business: Location: Type of Business: Type of License: Reason for Application: RECOMMENDATION Rib Crib Barbecue 19930 Stevens Creek Blvd. Restaurant On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place Premise to Premise Transfer Fiduciary Transfer There are no use permit restrictions or zoning restrictions which would prohibit this use, and staffhas no objection to the issuance of the license. Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Submitted by: David W. Knapp, City Manager -- G:planning/misc/abcribcrib P~nted on Recycled Paper Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ABC 211 State of California TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 100 Paseo de San Antonio Room 119 San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 277-I 200 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: First Owner: Name of Business: Location of Business: County: Is premise inside city limits'? Mailing Address: (If different from premises address) Type of license(s): 47 Transferor's license/name: File Number: 398265 Receipt Number: 1411516 Geographical Code: 4303 Copies Mailed Date: March 10, 2003 Issued Date: SAN JOSE THRC GROUP INC RIB CRIB BARBEQUE 19930 STEVENS CREEK BLVD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SANTA CLARA 302 MAIN ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 252261 / GUNTHER REST,~ Census Tract 5081.01 Dropping Partner: Yes License Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master 47 ON-SALEGENERALI 24071 TRANSFER/FIDUCIAR P40 y 47 ON-SALE GENERAL I PREMISE TO PREMISE TRAN$ P40 y Dup Date Fee 0 03/07/03 $50.00 0 03/07/03 $100.00 Total $I50.00 Have you ever been convicted of a felony? No Have you eve;' violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? No Explain any "Yes" answer to the above queslions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in an on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County cf SANTA CLARA Date: March 7, 2003 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executixe officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: (2) that he has read the ~oregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has an), direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a [nan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be '~ithdrawt~ by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department, Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) THRC GROUP INCSee~glL_~Signatur. e~a:.age State of CaLifornia APPLICATION SIGNATURE SHEET ("SIGN ON") Department of AJcoholic Beverage Control · This form is to be used as the signature page for applications not signed in the Distdc[ Office. · Read instructions on reverse before completing. · All signatures must be notarized in accordance with laws of the State where signed. TRRC GROUP INC. [] Sole Owner [] Corporation [] Partnership [] Limited Liabili .ty Company [] Parmcrship-Ltd [] Other 4 TRANSACTION TY~E [] Original [] Person to Person Transfer [] Exchange [] Premise to Premise Transfer [] Other 302 bLAiN ST., LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 19930 STEVENS CREEK BLVD., CUPERTINO, CA 95014 APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION SOLE OWNER PARTNERSHIP/LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Signatures of general partners only) application thee willbe a service ghavge of one-fourth o f th~,lie~mse~i~/t paid, tip to $100. *r~E J~President [] Vice President [] ChahL-ma~ff.~e ~a/m~ , , ~ Secmta~ ~ ~st. Secret~ ~ Chief F~ci~ Officer ~ ~st. Tre~er LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 11. The limited liability company is member-~un [] Yes [] No (if no. complete Item #12 below) ABC-211 -SIG (9/01) "SIGN ON" ?-3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ~o. 59o7 County personally appeared ~ personally known to COMM. #1380370 before me, ~ g '~/L g,\q t'._O~ C~ NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E,G., "JANE DOL~, NOTARY, PUBLIC" me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my h~3j3d~nd official seal. Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER .~CO RIvlDUAL PORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATtORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(lES) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF ~MENT NUMBER OF PAGES DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOC AT ON · 8236 Remmet Ave., P,O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 City Hall 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3227 FAX (408) 777-3109 Human Resources Summary AGENDA ITEM I~ AGENDA DATE: April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE 1. Adopt a resolution approving the reallocation of a City Channel PrograrnfPromotions Director position to Web Specialist, Resolution No. 03- 0Ct). BACKGROUND To provide a greater level of service to the community, the City is committed to the continued development of E-Government. As we move forward, the city's web site will provide our community with an easy, convenient and cost effective means to access information and conduct city business. Currently, the city's web site is staffed by a Geographic Information System (GIS) Coordinator who divides her time between GIS and web site maintenance. The proposed reallocation will establish a full-time position dedicated solely to web site development and enhancement. By reallocating an existing vacancy, this will be accomplished without adding a new position. As proposed, the reallocation will be implemented through two recruitments: an open recruitment for Web Specialist, and a promotional only recruitment for Producer. The Web Specialist opening will be extensively advertised with broad outreach efforts. The Producer recruitment will provide a rare career development/upward mobility opportunity for highly qualified and experienced city staff members. FUNDING Annual funding for the Web Specialist would be approximately $91,850 including salary and benefits. Since the position replaces a Program/Promotions Director, the net aimual cost is approximately $20,300. Printedon Recycled Paper I ~] RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends that the City Council approve: 1. Resolution 03- ~)[00 reallocating a Program/Promotions Director to Web Specialist. Submitted by: ~andy Abe, Human Resources Manager Approved for submission: David W. Knapp, City Manager DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE REALLOCATION OF A CITY CHANNEL PROGRAM/PROMOTIONS DIRECTOR POSITION TO WEB SPECIALIST WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino is committed to the continued development of E-Government; WHEREAS, the development of the City of Cupertino's web site requires a full- time web professional for ongoing enhancement and maintenance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a Program/Promotions Director position be reallocated to Web Specialist effective May 5, 2003. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular City Council meeting of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003 by the following vote: VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY~ ~F CUPEi(TINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 kffnberlys~cupertino.org OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SUMMARY Agenda Item No. i I Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Authorize fine arts grants for Spring 2003 as recommended by the Fine Arts Commission. BACKGROUND Twice each year the Fine Arts Commission solicits grant proposals from artists and performers, and selects those proposals that provide a direct benefit to the citizens of Cupertino. A total of $16,500 was available for grants this fiscal year. In November, grants totaling $11,000 were awarded to the Cupertino Cherry Blossom Festival, the Chinese Performing Artists of America, the Bay Area Showcase Chores, the California Youth Symphony, and the Euphrat Museum of Art. A balance of $5,500.00 remains. Four applications were received totaling $5,900 from the following groups and individuals: Name Proposal/Event Nupur Folk Dance Academy Nnpur Folk Dance Academy would present a free performance 1171 Johnson Avenue featuring 90 performers showcasing 15 folk dances from different San Jose, CA 95129 states of India. The performance will be at Hyde Middle School in (408) 861-0183 home May. (408) 861-0172 work Janlyn Dance Company Janlyn Dance Company proposes to present six performances of 10521 San Felipe Road "Great Dance for Kids - Beware the Goblins' Fruit" to public schools Cupertino, CA 95014 within the boundaries of the City of Cupertino. This performance is (408) 202-5520 home based on the narrative poem "Goblin Market," and serves as an (408) 446-2190 work allegory for the dangers of substance abuse in today's world. The production includes contemporary dialogue and characters. Jeunifer Swanton Brown Requesting funding for an extension of last year's poetry program at California Poets in the Schools Regnart School. It would be expanded to third grade classes at three 11266 Monterey Court schools and the Cupertino library. Funds would provide for a poetry Cupertino, CA 95014 curriculum in the public schools based on California Poets in Schools (408) 366-0150 statewide program. Georgia Sutherland Requesting funds for a holiday concert and sing-along in late 2003 at Bay Area Showcase Chores the Quinlan Community Center. This group won the Sweet Adelines 10184 Potters Hatch Common Regional Competition in April of 2002. Their concert will feature Cupertino, CA 95014 music from Christian and Jewish traditions as well as non-secular (408) 446-1612 work tunes. The audience will be invited to sing along with some holiday printed on Recycled Paper I I ~ i April 7, 2003 Fine Arts Grants Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: That City Council authorize the following grants: · Nupur Folk Dance Academy, $1,300 · Janlyn Dance Academy, $1,700 · Jennifer Swanton Brown, $1,300 · Bay Area Showcase Chorus, $1,200 Submitted by: Approved for submission: Kimberly Smit~'~-~ City Clerk David Knapp City Manager CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 Fax: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. [ ~ Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Accept Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant Allocation BACKGROUND AB3229 (Brulte) was enacted as part of the state budget package. The bill established the COPS program and appropriated $100 million fi.om the state general fund for the 2002-03 fiscal year. The COPS program provides funding for local agencies for the propose of ensuring public safety. The City of Cupertino has received $103,685 for fiscal year 2002-03. USE OF FUNDS Cities are required to appropriate COPS revenues to fund front line municipal police services. This can include anti-gang and community crime prevention programs. The funds are to be appropriated pursuant to a written request fi.om the Chief of Police or the Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. Capt. John Hirokawa has submitted the attached recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the sheriff's request for the expenditure of COPS funds. Submitted by: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager PO 03-06 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTiNO APPROViNG REQUEST FROM SHERIFF FOR USE OF AB 3229 (BRULTE) CITIZENS' OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM FUNDS OF $103,685 WHEREAS, AB 3229 (Brulte) was enacted as part of the state budget program; and WHEREAS, the bill establishes the Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) program and appropriates $100 million from the state general fund for the 2002~03 fiscal year and the City of Cupertino's per capita share is $103,685 for fiscal year 2002-03; and WHEREAS, the COPS program provides funding for local agencies for the purpose of ensuring public safety; and WHEREAS, cities are required to appropriate COPS revenues to fund front line municipal police services which can include anti-gang and community crime prevention progrmns; and WHEREAS, these funds are to be appropriated pursuant to a written request from the Chief of Police or the Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby approves the Sheriff's request for the expenditures of AB 3229 Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) funds. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPERTINO CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) Fiscal Year 2002103 Program School Resource Officer - 2nd Public Dialogue Consortium/City Neighborhood Leader Program Cops and Kids Program Total Grant Proposal Allocation $76,011 $12,674 $15,000 $103,685 CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. I ~ Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Accept California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) High Technology Grant Allocation. BACKGROUND This year, the State of California awarded a funding source for the promotion of technology in the area of Public Safety. This Budget Act item 9210-106-0001 provides Cupertino with $23,647 for fiscal year 2002/03. .USE OF FUNDS Cities are required to appropriate CLEEP revenues to fund technology for municipal police services. The funds are to be appropriated pursuant to a written request from the Chief of Police or the Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services to the city. Captain John Hirokawa has submitted the attached recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the sheriffs request for the expenditure of CLEEP funds. Submitted by: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO 03-062 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING REQUEST FROM SHERIFF FOR USE OF BUDGET ACT ITEM 9210-106-0001 CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM (CLEEP) HIGH TECHNOLOGY GRANT $23,647 WHEREAS, Budget Act Item 9210-106-0001 was enacted as part of the state budget program; and WHEREAS, the bill establishes the Califomia Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) High Technology Grant program and appropriates $35,400,000 from the state general fund for the 2002-03 fiscal year and the City of Cupertino's per capita share is $23,647 for fiscal year 2002-03; and WHEREAS, the CLEEPS program provides funding for local agencies for the purpose of ensuring public safety through high technology; and WHEREAS, cities are required to appropriate CLEEPS revenues to fund high technology municipal police services; and WHEREAS, these funds are to be appropriated pursuant to a written request from the Chief of Police or the Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby approves the Sheriff's request for the expenditures of Budget Item 9210-106-0001 California Law Enforcement Equipment Progrmn (CLEEPS) High Technology Grant. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPERTINO CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM (CLEEP) Fiscal Year 2002/03 Program Allocation Code Enforcement Data Ticket Hand Helds, Misc. Items $11,500 Santa Clara County Sheriff - Technology for office relocation; installation of fingerprint machine, etc. $12,147 $23,647 RESOLUTION NO. 03-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO SETTING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION OF AREA DESIGNATED "DOLORES AVENUE 02-04", PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DOLORES AVENUE BETWEEN BYRNE AVENUE AND ORANGE AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY 0.21 ACRE, HSU (APN 357-14-015) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a request for am~exation of territory designated "Dolores Avenue 02-04" from property owners, Allen and Cindy Hsu; and WHEREAS, the property, 0.21_+ acre on the south side of Dolores Avenue between Byme Avenue and Orange Avenue (APN 357-14-015) is contiguous to the City of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on May 21, 1984, to City of Cupertino Pre R1-7.5 zone; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmental review completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section 56826, the boundaries to be definite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above certification has been paid; and WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 56826 the City Council of the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an annexation to the City; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; Resolution No. 03-063 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider annexation of the territory designated "Dolores Avenue 02-04" and detachment from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District at their regular meeting of April 21,2003. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 2 "EXHIBIT A" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOLORES AVENUE 02-04 OCTOBER 2002 REVISION: JANUARY, 2003 All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of Califorrfia, more particularly described as follow: A portion of Lot 155 and a portion of Lot 156 as shown upon the Map of Subdivision" A" Monta Vista, which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder oft he County of Santa Clara, State of California, on April 1 lth, 1917 in Book "P' of Maps, Page 20, and more particularly described as follow: Beginning at the point of th.e Southeast corner of Lot 155 as shown on said subdivision; Thence from said point of beginning North 80.82 fl along the Easterly boundary of said Lot 155, also the Westerly boundary of that certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled" Dolores Avenue 88-13 "to a point on the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue (variable width right of' way ). Thence West 70.15 feet along the Southerly sideline of Dolores Avenue and the boundary of the certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Byrne Avenue 88-11" Thence along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet, with a central angle of 90° 00' 00", for an arc length 31.42 feet to a point on the Easterly sideline of Byrne Avenue ( variable width right of way ) and the boundary of the certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Byrne Avenue 88-11" Thence South 79.94 feet along the Easterly side line of Byrne Avenue to the boundary of the certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled" Byrne Avenue 85-01". Thence East 90.15 feet along the said boundary of the certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled" Byrne Avenue 85-01 "to the Easterly boundary of the portion of Lot 156; Thence North 19.12 feet along the Easterly boundary of the portion of Lot 156 to the Point of Beginning. Contairdng: A. P.N.: 8924 square feet, more or less 0.21 acres, more or less 357- 14-015 ~ 25538 clvl,, /., N 5O O 50 100 1 ~nch = 100 fL. 200 A= 90'00'00" L=51.42 70.15 APN 557-14.-015 8924 SQ.FT. 0.21 ACRES EXISTING ANNE; BYRNE AVE. 85-01 & RESOLUTION NO. 6604- 'TN LOT AST 90.15 LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUNDARY LINE OF EXISTING ANNEXATION EXISTING CITY LIMITS ;TING ANNEXATION BYRNE AVE. 88-11 DOLORES AVE. N SITE ALCAZAR AVE DOLORES AVE Mc CLELLAN RD. VICINITY MAP NO TO SCALE EXISTING ANNEXATION DOLORES AVE. 88-1.3 & RESOLUTION NO. 8086 DIMENSION ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS OF A FOOT. EXHIBIT B PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ENTITLED DOLORES AVE. 02-04 DATE: OCT, 2002 BY: d.C. SCALE: 1"=100' REVISED: JAN, 200.3 JAMES C. CHEN, C.E., S.E. P.O.BOX 20302, SAN JOSE, CA 95160 RESOLUTION NO. 03-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "BYRNE AVENUE 02-08", PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BYRNE AVENUE BETWEEN GRANADA AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY 0.41 ACRE, PEREZ (APN 357-11-005) WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.41+_ acre on the west side of Byme Avenue between Granada Avenue and Hermosa Avenue (APN 357-11-005) has been filed by property owners Richard and Grace Perez; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 03-053 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Byrne Avenue 02-08"; and WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the proposal consent to this annexation; and WHEREAS, Section 56757 of the California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting authority for said annexation; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 56757 of the Government Code for the annexation of property designated "Byme Avenue 02-08", more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino: Resolution No. 03-064 Page 2 That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.41 acre. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy of annexing when providing City services. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment, and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration. The City Council on May 21, 1984, enacted an ordinance prezoning the subject territory to City of Cupertino Pre R1-8 zone. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special districts. That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission. g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this determination. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of ownership. k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under provisions of the Government Code. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 56837 et seq. of the Government Code. 2 Resolution No. 03-064 Page 3 That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give notice of said annexation as prescribed by law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of these reorganization proceedings the territory annexed will be detached from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 3 15--3 EXHITB1T A ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO BYRNE AVE. 02-08 MARCH 2003 All that certain real property situated in the County of Santa Clara unincorporated area, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Being all of Lot 28, and a portion of the dedicated 10-foot strip, Tract No. 150 entitled "Stevens Creek Subdiwsmn recorded m Book 5 of Map , Pages 4 and 5 in Santa Clara County Records. Beginning at the northwesterly corner of the annexation to the City of Cupertino, entitled "Byme Ave. 82-04", said point also lying on the easterly boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino, entitled "Byrne Avenue 01-05", thence along the said annexation Byrne Ave. 82-04 South a distance 102.18 feet to the easterly prolongation of the northerly line of said Lot 28 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Thence continuing along said annexation Byme Ave. 82-04 South a distance 60.00 feet; Thence leaving the said annexation Byrne Ave. 82-04 and along the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of said Lot 28 and along the southerly line of said Lot 28: 1. West a distance of 311.43 feet mom or less to the easterly boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Blackberry Farm 91 ~0"; Thence along said Blackberry Farm 91-0 and the westerly line of said Lot 28 the following courses: 2. N15°04'00'Wq a distance of 12.51 feet; 3. N06°43'30"E a distance of 48.25 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 28; Thence along said northerly line and the easterly prolongation thereof 4. East a distance of 309.03 feet more or less to the easterly line of said 10-foot strip and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 18,726 square feet (0.430 acres) A.P.N. 357-11-005 31 Lot,/l~rA bo~rr^ City Hail 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 77%3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM I ~ SUBJECT AND ISSUE Summary AGENDA DATE April 7, 2003 Adopt a resolution in support of clean fuel vehicles and participation in clean air programs. BACKGROUND The majority of California's air pollution comes from mobile sources such as cars, trucks and buses. Conventional gasoline-powered cars degrade with use and become serious sources of pollution. As our population grows, the gains we have made in cleaning our air will be at risk and may begin to erode. A number of low emission vehicles are now available from many manufacturers in ultra-low emission, super-ultra-low emission, and zero-emission designs. The City has leased several electric powered vehicles in this category utilizing clean air funds and are currently using them as part of the fleet. Reducing air pollution is a shared responsibility, requiring the participation of all communities. Cities can play a role by purchasing low or zero emission vehicles and equipment as part of their on-going purchasing program. The American Lung Association of California has developed model policies on this subject, which are used as a resource to develop the City's own resolution attached. The policy proposes that the City shall give preference in its vehicle procurement to acquiring the lowest emission vehicles which can meet the required specifications and are practical and reasonably cost competitive for a given application or where funding is available to assure that such vehicles are reasonably cost competitive. Adoption of this policy resolution will strengthen the City's competitiveness in applying for future grant funds to purchase low and zero emission vehicles which may be made available. RECOMMENDATION That the Cupertino City Council adopt Resolution No. 63~¢31*~upporting the purchase of clean fuel vehicles and participation in clean air programs. Submitted by: Ralph A. Qualls, Jr. Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Printed on Recycled Paper DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO IN SUPPORT OF CLEAN FUEL VEHICLES AND PARTICIPATION IN CLEAN AIR PROGRAMS WHEREAS, the much of California's air pollution comes from mobile sources, such as cars, trucks and buses; and WHEREAS, conventional gasoline-powered cars degrade with use and become serious soumes of pollution and are significant contributors to unhealthy air; and WHEREAS, a wide variety of low emission vehicles in many applications are now available from many manufacturers in ultra-low emission (ULEV), super-ultra-low emission (SULEV), and zero-emission (ZEV) configurations. Some are powered by gasoline, some natural gas, some hybrid electrics, and some are battery-powered electrics, and; WHEREAS, zero emission vehicles can assure clean air now and in the future and tend to have lower operating costs than conventional vehicles; and WHEREAS, reducing air pollution is a shared responsibility, requiring the participation of all communities and their community members; and WHEREAS, as cities are significant users of vehicles and equipment, and could utilize clean fuel vehicles because of access to central refueling stations and relatively short travel distances; and WHEREAS, as public institutions, cities have a responsibility to serve the public interest and avoid creating air pollution themselves and to whenever possible, willingly participate in clean air programs; and WHEREAS, the city of Cupertino has leased ULEVs and used them in its fleet on a day- to-day basis; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Cupertino shall give preference in its vehicle procurement to acquiring the lowest emission vehicles which can meet the required specifications and are practical and reasonably cost competitive for a given application or where outside funding is available to assure that such vehicles are reasonably cost competitive. Public safety and emergency vehicles shall be exempt from this policy. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Resolution No. 03-065 Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAiN: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino RESOLUTION NO. 03-066 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTiNO ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES FROM MARY PESCE KING, TRUSTEE OF THE 1995 MARY PESCE K1NG REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JANUARY 5, 1995, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 50% INTEREST AND SANDRA DELGADO, A MARRIED WOMAN AS HER SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 50% iNTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, 10739 SANTA LUCIA ROAD, APN 342-17-036 WHEREAS, Mary Pesce King, Trustee of the 1995 Mary Pesce King Revocable Trust dated January 5, 1995, as to an Undivided 50% Interest And Sandra Delgado, a Married Woman As Her Sole and Separate Property, as to an Undivided 50% Interest, as Tenants In Common have executed a Grant of Easement for Roadway Purposes which is in good and sufficient form, granting to the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, easement over certain real property for roadway purposes, situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which is as follows: All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, located at 10739 Santa Lucia Road, APN 342-17-036. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino accept said grant so tendered; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record said grant and this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES APN 342-17-036 10739 Santa Lucia Road Mary Pesce King~ Trustee of the 1995 Mary Pesce King Revocable Trust dated January 5~ 1995~ as to an undivided 50% interest and Sandra Delgado~ a Married Woman as her sole and separate property~ as to an undivided 50% interesh as tenants in common~ grant to the CITY OF CUPERTINO for public roadway purposes, together with the right to construct, repair, operate, and maintain any and all public utilities and improvements which shall be or become necessary for preservation of the public safety, welfare or convenience, the hereinafter described property which is situated in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, and as described as follows: (See Exhibit "A" & "B") IN WITNESS WHEREOF, executed this ga4~..day of P'e/~F, 2003. Owners: ~Otary acknowledgment to be attached) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of 6'~,/¢~-'~*~'~/"/'/¢' County On ~¢~ ~Z ~ before me, ~ ~ Name(s) of Sign~s) ~ personally known to me - OR - ~ proved to me on the basis of satisfacto~ evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. smp company Civil Engineers- Surveyors EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 10739 SANTA LUCIA ROAD STREET DEDECATION BEGINNING at the most Northerly corner of that certain parcel of land, as sho;vn on that certain Record of Survey recorded May 20, 1997 in Book 688 of Maps at page 30, Santa Clara County Records, thence South 44 Degrees 58 Minutes 00 Seconds East a distance of 176.80.53 feet; thence South 48 Degrees 22 Minutes 30 Seconds West a distance of 5.0 feet; thence North 44 Degrees 58 Minutes 00 Seconds West a distance of 176.80.53 feet; thence North 48 Degrees 22 Minutes 30 Seconds East a distance of 5.0 feet; to the point of beginning. 121 I Park Ave, Suite 208 San Jos¢. CA 95126 · (408) 472-5062 (408) 287~8(~30 194 M 36 109.00' LOT-2 84L14' LOT-1 LOT 117 s48'22'30"w 10.0' LOT 117 / PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION FOR STFIEET DED I CATION , EXHIBIT A SANTA LUCIA D/RE, CUPEFt'TINO SMP COMPANY Civil Engineers -.Land Surveyors 1211 Park Avenue, Suite 208 San Jose, CA 95126 Tel. (408) 4?2-5062 Fax (408) 28?-8630 DATE: 12-17-02 SCALE: 1"=50' JOB NO.: 2224 CUPEP INO__ City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM I ~ AGENDA DATE April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Adopt a resolution authorizing execution of a Joint Use Agreement for a trail between the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City of Cupertino for Regnart Creek BACKGROUND The Developer of the subdivision on Wallin Court, Tract No. 9335, was required to install a section of trail along Regnart Creek. This trail section starts at the intersection of Wallin Court and Orion Lane and runs along the creek and connects to Orogrande Place as shown on the attached diagram. The Joint Use Agreement (JUA) is needed because the trail passes over land owned by the Santa Clara Valley Water District. The JUA will allow for the use of the land for construction and when the project is completed will provide for use as a trail. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution No. 03- ~ [~ Authorizing the Mayor to execute a Joint Use Agreement (JUA) with Santa Clara Valley Water District for the Regnart Creek Trail. Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. I?.napp City Manager Printed on Recycled Paper DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR THE REGNART CREEK TRAIL WHEREAS, a Joint Use Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District is necessary because the Regnart Creek Trail passes over land owned by the District; and WHEREAS, said Agreement will allow for the use of the land for bicycle and pedestrian access. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute a Joint Use Agreement for bicycle and pedestrian access of the Regnart Creek Trail on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAiN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CURVE DATA D(LTA ~ 5' 55'oo' 58' 59'33' KIRKEBY ENGINEERING 324,9 ST~VEI'~*~ CREEK BLVD,, SUITE 10,1 SAN JOSE, CA 95117 1408) 984.-0331 LSI' 9 / / LOT I No,~71, j'..~ .... ~ FOR BE. NE?IT O? TttE _ \, £1TY OF CUPERTINO C'}~.... PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRJPTJ'ON J SCALE:' ],': ~)0' , JaMITIJS£4RE4 FOR '! D^T~:~-~[~,.?.O01 ! B.£N£FLT OF OlTY O~ C~ERTI~ ~o~ No.~O ! CUPEP INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM Summary AGENDA DATE April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Extend the existing agreement with Apple Computer for the disposal of electronic products and computers BACKGROUND On September 16, 2002 the Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract wherein the City and Apple Computer, Inc. have partnered to provide an electronic waste disposal program for Cupertino residents at their facility on Buhb Road. The facility is open Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. Apple has hired vendors that only dispose of waste in an environmentally friendly manner. In the past six months, the program has collected an estimated 70,000 lbs. of e-waste. Participants' survey results indicate a high level of customer satisfaction. Many residents have requested that televisions be added to the list of acceptable items. Apple is currently considering this request for next fiscal year and will provide the City cost estimates for this service. Staff will provide appropriate recommendations for the e-waste partnering program in FY 2003-04 as part of the FY 2003-04 budget. FISCAL IMPACT There is a sufficient balance in the ongoing $25,000 of Resource Recovery funds authorized to fund the program through the end of the year and no additional funding is required. RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an extension to the e-waste agreement with Apple Computers, Inc. from April 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004. Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: Da~'id W. K~app City Manager SOLUT, ON NO. 03-068 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER VACATION OF A PORTION OF A ROADWAY WITHIN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO PURSUANT TO SECTION 8320 ET SEQ. OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF; MADRID ROAD WHEREAS, that certain roadway easement more particularly described in the attached exhibits and made part hereof, is deemed unnecessary for present and prospective use; and WHEREAS, the City Council elects to proceed pursuant to the provisions of Section 8320 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interests that the City Council initiates the vacation of said easement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate the aforesaid portion of roadway. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That the 5th day of May, at 6:45 p.m., in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, is the time and place fixed for heating on the above proposed vacation; 2. That the aforesaid date is not less than 15 days from passage of this resolution pursuant to law; 3. That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be published in the manner prescribed by law, and shall cause certified copies to be posted along the line of said property proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the date of hearing and no more than 300 feet apart with a minimum of 3 being posted. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Members of the City Council APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino EXHIBIT B AREA VACATED BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO =42,00' =20,84- =28'25'49" LOT 4- (510M2) S89'58'44-"W / 4-0.36'(40.28'REC.) LEGEND: BOUNDARY OF AREA VACATED EXHIBIT B ' PARCEL TO BE VACATED BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO All of that real properly situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clare, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center line of Maddd Road, said point also being in the center of a Cul-De-Sac of said road as shown upon that certain Parcel Map recorded in Book 510 of Maps at Page 2, Santa Clare County Records; thence proceeding along said center line S00°00'25"E 42.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence counter-clockwise along a non-tangent curve with a radius of 42.00 feet, a radial bearing of S00°00'25"E, an arc length of 20.84 feet and an included angle of 28°25'49"; thence S00°00'25"E 50.06 feet; thence S89°58'44'W 20.00 feet; thence N00°00'25"W 45.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 933 sq. f. (0.021 Acres) more or less and being a portion of Madrid Road as shown on the above mentioned Parcel Map. J:LJOBSWiteV_EGAI. S~EXHIBIT-B2.doc 01-31-03 SCALE: EXHIBIT B AREA VACATED BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO 9.0~'~ TO NITEL.L.ix~ ~ ~o, ~or..,k-g: ~:*- 1"=50' \ LANDS NITE LANDS NITE oF/ AREA TO BE VACATED TO NITE FROM THE CITY OF CUPERTINO (0.022± ACRES) S89'58'44"W /: 40.36'(4-0.28'REC.) =42.00' =21.08 3'45'12" Iod. LOT 4 (510M2) BOUNDARY OF AREA VACATED EXHIBIT B PARCEL VACATED BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO TO NITE All of that real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center line of Madrid Road, said point also being in the center of a Cul-De-Sac of said road, as shown upon that certain Parcel Map recorded in Book 510 of Maps at Page 2, Santa Clara County Records; thence proceeding along a radial line S28°51'54"W, 42.00 feet to the existing Westerly line of Madrid Road, as shown on the aforementioned Parcel Map and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence leaving said Westerly line of Madrid Road, counter-clockwise along a non-tangent curve with a radius of 42.00 feet, a radial bearing of S28°44'47'W, an arc length of 21.08 feet and an included angle of 28°45'12", thence S0°00'25"E, 45.00 feet; thence S89°58'44"W, 20.28 feet; thence N0°05'06"E, 50.18 feet; to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 945 sq. ft. (0.022 Acres) more or less and being a portion of Madrid Road as shown upon that certain Parcel Map recorded in Book 510 of Maps at Page 2, Santa Clara County Records. J:~JOBSWite[REV-EXHIBIT-B.doc 11-19-02 CUPERTINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDAITEM ~i Summary AGENDA DATE April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Review bids and award contract for De Anza Boulevard Advanced Traffic Management System (De Anza ATMS), Project No. 420-9534, to the low bidder, VCI Telecom, Inc., in the amount of $592,935.50, and approval of a contingency of $60,000 to cover any unforeseen work required to complete the project, for a total of $652,935.50. BACKGROUND The De Anza ATMS project is located on De Anza Boulevard between Prospect Road and Homestead Road and on Rodrigues Avenue from De Anza Boulevard to City Hall. The work consists, in general, of installing and testing 11 closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras, signal interconnect upgrades, fiber optic cable, pull boxes, and communications equipment. The bids received reflect unit prices for the work, including additive bid items Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D. The additive bid items in each group are for this same type of work in additional locations and for spare equipment. The project is a federally funded second cycle Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21) Surface Transportation Program/Congestion Management & Air Quality Improvement (STP/CMAQ) project. The total budget is $900,000, which includes design, administration, construction and contingency costs. The goals of this project are to minimize delay caused by incidents on freeways and surface streets and to improve the City and other regional agencies' ability to respond rapidly to clear the incidents. This project will help achieve these goals by improving collection and dissemination of travel conditions in real time for traffic management staff, as well as by facilitating traffic signal coordination across agency boundaries through deployment of traffic responsive and incident signal timing. In the future, facilities installed by this project will support regional traveler information web sites and traffic management data sharing. These goals are consistent with the goals of the Silicon Valley Intelligent Transportation System (SV-ITS) program, in partnership with San Jose, Campbell, Santa Clara, Los Gatos, Milpitas, Fremont, Santa Clara County and Caltrans. The following is a summary of bids received for the referenced project: Bidder Base Bid Manual Bros., Inc. $531,590.00 Rosendin Electric $513,236.00 Engineer's Estimate $510,415.00 VCI Telecom, Inc. $496,360.50 Bidder Alternate A Alternate B Alternate C Alternate D Total of Alternates Manual Bros., Inc. $26,580.00 $18,740.00 $24,190.00 $21,840.00 $91,350.00 Rosendin Electric $26,300.00 $16,400.00 $20,405.00 $15,875.00 $78,980.00 Engineer's Estimate $26,000.00 $20,300.00 $25,175.00 $21,025.00 $92,500.00 VCI Telecom, Inc. $38,280.00 $17,080.00 $22,350.00 $18,865.00 $96,575.00 It was specified during the bid solicitation that the low bid for the project was to be determined by the lowest Base Bid. The low bidder is VCI Telecom, Inc., with a Base Bid of $496,360.50. This Base Bid makes it possible to undertake all Alternate Bid items. Including Alternate Bid items A through D, with a combined cost of $96,575.00, brings the total amount of construction to $592,935.50. At a level approximately 3 % below the engineer's estimate, the Iow base bid appears to be a very good price for the work involved. FISCAL IMPACT This action would require expenditure from the approved Capital Improvement Project budget account no. 420-9534 in the amount of up to $652,935.50 for the construction. But since the project is fully reimbursable through a federal TEA-21 grant, there is no net fiscal impact. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council award the project DeAnza Boulevard Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS), Project No. 420-9534, to the low bidder, VCI Telecom, Inc., in the amount of $592,935.50, and authorize a contingency of $60,000.00, for a total project cost of $652,935.50. Submitted by: Ralph A. Quails, Jr. Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager CITY OF CUPERTINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 Fax: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ~a'L Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Approve the second amendment to the Joint Exemise of Powers Agreement (JPA) creating the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA). This amendment requires member agencies to obtain approval from their city councils for their share of SVACA's fiscal year budget and any mid-year budget amendments prior to the SVACA Board's approval. BACKGROUND The current JPA agreement provides for SVACA to request additional funds as needed during the fiscal year. Due to the current budget situations of the member cities and discussions with the SVACA Board regarding the need for cost containment, this amendment was proposed in an effort to protect the member cities from "surprise" budget adjustments. Under this new language, each member city must approve its estimated cost for SVACA prior to final adoption of the budget by the SVACA Board of Directors on or before June 30 of each year. In addition, if during the fiscal year them are proposed amendments to the budget that would require an increase to this amount, the Board cannot take final action to approve the budget amendment until each member agency has approved payment of its proportional sham. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council approve the amendment to the JPA to provide approval over all future budget proposals from SVACA. Submitted by: Approved for subrrdssion: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services David W. Knapp City Manager SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE SILICON VALLEY ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY This Amendment is made and entered into upon approval by all of the Member Agencies of the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority ("Authority") as defined in Section 1.14 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement executed by the Member Agencies in June and July of 2000 (hereafter "Agreement"). WHEREAS~ the Member Agencies desire to add language to Section 6.1 of the Agreement to require Member Agencies to obtain approval of their allocated proportional share of the budget prior to the Authority Board's approval of the fiscal year budget or any budget amendments that result in increases in the Member Agencies' allocated proportional shares during the course of the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, to accomplish this end, the Member Agencies have approved the amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority, as more particularly specified below. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MEMBER AGENCIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Section 6.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to insert the following language as a second paragraph in that Section: Each Member Agency shall approve the contribution of its allocated proportional share of the total estimated annual costs and expenses in the budget, as set forth in Section 6.3, prior to final adoption of the budget by the Board of Directors on or before June 30 of each year. If, during the course of any given fiscal year, there are proposed amendments to the budget that would require increased amounts to be paid by each Member Agency over and above the allocated proportional share attributed to the budget then in effect, the Board of Directors shall not take final action to approve any such budget amendment until each Member Agency has approved payment of its proportional share. 2. Except as expressly revised by this Amendment, all terms, conditions and requirements as set forth in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1013518.1 -- EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereupon duly authorized and their official seals to be hereto affixed on the dates as shown herein. MEMBER AGENCIES APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation By: Its: Its; Date: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: CITY OF CUPERTiNO, a municipal corporation By: Its: Its; Date: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: 2 1013518.1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF MONTE SERENO, a municipal corporation By: Its: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: By: Its; Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Its: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a municipal corporation By: Its; Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Its: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: CITY OF SUNNYVALE, a municipal corporation By: Its; Date: 3 1013518.1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Its: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: CITY OF LOS GATOS, a municipal corporation By: Its; Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Its: Date: ATTEST: By: Its: Date: CITY OF SARATOGA, a municipal corporation By: Its; Date: 1013518.1 CUPEI TINO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 Fax: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. SUBJECT AND ISSUE Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 Consider adoption of the 2003-04 Fee Schedule BACKGROUND All user fees are reviewed each year in conjunction with the preparation of the budget. Our goal is to ensure that, to the extent possible, fees cover the cost of providing services. Several changes are proposed this year, which primarily adjust for cost of living increases. Specific proposals are: General Fees: · Fees have been increased by 3.7 percent to reflect cost of living increases. · Fees for community festivals, flea markets and farmer's market have been added. · An Intemet processing fee has been added to cover the cost of providing on-line services. · The fee for all Municipal Code parking violations have been increased to $35. The fee has not been raised for eight years. Engineering Fees: Fees have been increased by 3.7 percent to reflect cost of living increases. Telecommunications Facility Fee to cover the installation and occupancy for installations in the rights-of-way in accordance with the 1996 Telecommunications Act has been increased by five percent. Planning Fees: · Fees have been increased by 3.7 percent to reflect cost of living increases. Parks and Recreation Fees: Various fees for the Senior Center, Sports Center, Blackberry Golf Course, Monta Vista Recreation Center and Quinlan Center were increased and are consistent with market rates for these services. Printod on Recycted Paper ~ ~:_ [ RECOMMENDATION: The recommended adjustments to user fees provide for recovery of the cost of City services, conform to our budget revenue guidelines, and become effective on July 1, 2003. Staff recommends that City Council apprOve the proposed fees. Submitted by: Approved for submission: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO: 03-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF CUPERTINO RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 02-056 AND ESTABLISHING USER FEES WHEREAS, the State of California requires fees charged for service rendered not to exceed the cost of delivering said services; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held to review user fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has established guidelines for setting user fees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that: 1. User fees are established per attachments A through E. 2. All user fees previously established by Council action or resolution are hereby superseded. 3. User fees are effective July 1, 2003. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this day of April, 2003 by the following vote: Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Department General Engineering Planning Building Recreation CITY OF CUPERTINO SUMMARY OF USER FEES Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule A B C D E CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule A - General Photocopies - per sheet Microfilm/Microfiche Printout Returned Check Charge Late Payment on 30 Day Delinquent City Invoices Property Liens Administrative Fee Municipal Code Book Williamson Act Filings Tape Dubbing - Audio, Video, DVD, CD VHS DVD CD Webcast/CD Audio DV CAM/BETA CAM U-Matic Mini DV Audio Cassette Notary Fee Fingerprinting Processing Handbill Permit Renewals Solicitor Permit (Includes fingerprinting) Renewals Massage Establishment Fee (includes fingerprinting and background check) Renewals Massage Therapist Fee (Includes fingerprinting and background check) Renewals Massage Managing Employee Fee (Includes fingerprinting and background check) Renewals $0.20 $0.50/frame $2O.O0 7% per annum $30 per book/block/parcel lien $77.00 $105.00 $12.00/tape $20.00/DVD $ ! 2.00/CD $50.00/tape $25.00/tape $30.00/DV $1.00/tape $10.00/signature State Fee $32.00 Plus $12.00 City Administrative Fee $90.0O $26.00 $136.00 $26.00 $167.00 $41.00 $167.00 $41.00 $167.00 $41.00 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule A - General (continued) Taxi Driver Permits (Includes fingerprinting and background check) Renewals All Municipal Code Parking Violations Duplicate Business Licenses Business License Exemption Administrative Fee Business LicenseDatabase New Business Monthly Reports Community Festivals Farmers Market Flea Markets Sign Removal (Public Right-of-Way) Dangerous Dog Annual Registration Fee GIS Maps Standard pre-formatted maps Customized maps Data on CDROM Intemet Processing Fee Police Disturbances Abatement Fee Reseamh and Compilation of New Records Fee (For information requests greater than 1/2 hour.) Graffiti Cleanup Damage to City Property Grounds, Streets, Facilities Traffic - Engineering Traffic - Maintenance Code Enforcement $167.00 $41.00 $35.00 $10.00 $50.00 $100.00 15.00/month $7.50/day/vendor $2.00/week/vendor $8.15/month/vendor $15.00/sign $177.00 $25.00/map $100.00 $45.O0 $2.00/transaction Actual Cost * Actual Cost * Actual Cost * Actual Cost * Actual Cost * Actual Cost * Actual cost is: 1) Employee hourly rate plus 40% for benefits and overhead, and 2) cost of materials, ,.contractors and supplies. 2 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03.069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule B - Engineering Street Cuts Permit to excavate in public right-of-way (improvement costs up to $3,300). Permit to excavate in public fight-of-way (improvement costs over $3,300) Grading Permit To insure grading conforms to City ordinances and council approvals. Minimum Fee or 6% of Improvement Value Parcel Map/Tract Maps To insure maps conform to state map act and council approvals. Parcel Map Tract Map Plan Checking and Inspection Review only (no permit issued) or improvement agreement Permit Fee or Residential 5% of Site Improvement Commercial/Office/Industrial 6% of Site Improvement Annexation (plus county filing fees) Certificates of Compliance To verify lots were not created in violation of local ordinances or state map act. Encroachment Permit To allow private facilities or improvements to be placed in public right-of-way. Annual Utility Company Permit $227.00 5%of Improvement Costs $192.00 $520.00 14 lots $520.00 + $11.00 each lot over 4 $363.00 $2,385.OO minimum $701.00 $736.00 $168.00 Residential $215.00 Non-Residential $210.00 3 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule B - Engineering (continued) Lot Line Adjustment City must verify that lots after adjustment conform to zoning and setbacks. Power Cost Developer is responsible for one year power cost for streetlights. The latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC. Soil and Geology Report Plus any materials/service fees. Geologic Report Deposit Engineering Copies Microfiche Engineering Copies Microfilm Banners Transportation Permit Telecommunication Facility Fee (5 % increase per year) Installation Rate Occupancy Rate $380.00 $31.70 Short Repoff $189.00 Long Repo~ $2,00O.00 8.15/copy 9.30/copy 10.40/copy $298.00 State Fee ($16.00 Single) State Fee ($90.00 Annual) $1.65/lineal foot of conduit/year $0.82/lineal foot of leased conduit/year CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule C - Definition of Planning Fee Services Full Application An application which typically involves all steps of the development review process including Pre- application Review, Environmental Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. The application requires an advertised public heating before the Planning Commission and a public heating or agendized review before the City Council. Applications requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) are included in this category. The application fee for particularly complicated applications and those requiring the preparation of an EIR will be based upon an hourly rate as described in the fee schedule. Limited Application An application which involves all steps of the development review process outlined in the Full Application description with the exception of the City Council. Minor Application An application which involves minimal steps in the review process and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. The staff evaluation and report preparations are less extensive. The application requires Planning Commission review. Miscellaneous Application An application which typically involves a non-noticed review by the Planning Commission. The application does not typically require pre-application meetings or Environmental Review and involves minimal staff preparation. Examples of this application are interpretation or clarification of conditions of approval or ordinance requirements, sign exceptions, fence exceptions, and tentative map and use permit extensions. Appeal A request from the project applicant or interested party to reverse or amend a decision made by staff or an advisory body. An appointed public official serving on the board that made the decision subject to the appeal, an appointed public official serving on a board that is directly affected by the decision and the City Council members are exempted from the fee requirement. Directors Application An application which receives final approval by staff either via an advertised public hearing or non-heating format. The application may involve a pre-application meeting and/or Environmental Review committee review. CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule C - Definition of Planning Fee Services (continued) Temporary Sign Permit A staff review of a temporary sign application which includes an evaluation of the sign request, the entry into the temporary log and site review by Code Enforcement Officers. The permit fee is in addition to the submittal of a deposit to guarantee removal of the sign upon expiration of the temporary permit. Housing Mitigation Fee Fee collected is used to construct new affordable residential units for Cupertino residents and employees. The fees mitigate the need for affordable units caused by expanding offices creating new jobs and new residential development, office, R&D, industrial and residential development. NOTES: Combined applications which are processed simultaneously (i.e., filed at the same time) will be classified based on highest rating. Mixed use applications will be classified based upon the highest intensity and review process. The Director of Community Development will have discretion to classify projects based upon the above criteria. 6 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule C - Planning Full Application Zoning Tentative Map Use Permit Applicable base fee plus hourly staff rate in excess of 48 hours Limited Application Use Permit Tentative Map Amendment Minor Application Use Permit Tentative Map Hillside Exception Miscellaneous Application General Architectural and S~te Approval Sign/Fence/Height Exception Tentative Map and Use Permit Extension Planning Commission Interpretation R- 1 Design Review/Exception/Second Story Deck Director Tentative Map - Lot Consolidation Variance Minor Amendmenffremporary Use Permit Temporary Sign Permit Appeal Amount to be refunded if appeal is granted. Housing Mitigation In-Lieu Fees Residential Office/lndustrial/R&D Stevens Creek Blvd. Specific Plan Fee $2,680.00 $2,680.00 $2,195.00 $52.00 $1,540.00 $1,650.00 $1,270.00 $1,480.00 $1,480.00 $1,410.00 $555.00 $475.00 $198.00 $538.00 $455.00 $592.00 $930.00 $1,024.00 $209.00 $45.00/ calendar year $145.00 $1.15/sq. ft. $2.25/sq. ft. $.044/sq. ft. 7 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule C - Planning (continued General Plan Amendment Direct costs for staff, consultants, and materials. Sign agreement before application is accepted. Development Agreement Direct cost of City Attorney plus fulI application zoning fee. Sign agreement before application is accepted. $2,616.00 (Retainer) $2,616.00 (Retainer) CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03.069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Valuation Schedule OCCUPANCY AND TYPE REMODEL COST PER SO. FT. APARTMENT HOUSES *Type I or II F.R. Type V - Masonry or Type III Type V - Wood Frame Type 1 - Basement Garage COST PER NEW SQ. FT. $39.76 $126.67 $32.78 $102.89 $30.31 $ 95.12 $19.23 $ 43.38 AUDITORIUMS Type 1 or 11 F.R. $41.34 $121.56 Type 11 - 1-Hour $30.31 $ 88.04 Type 11 ~ N $30.27 $ 83.28 Type 111 - 1-Hour $30.31 $ 92.56 Type 111 - N $30.31 $ 87.81 Type V - I-Hour $30.31 $ 88.50 Type V - N $30.06 $ 82.59 BANKS *Type 1 or 1i F.R. $52.50 $171.79 Type 11 - 1-Hour $52.33 $126.55 Type 11 - N $52.24 $122.49 Type 111 - 1-Hour $53.58 $139.66 Type i11 - N $53.52 $134.67 Type V - 1-Hour $42.55 $126.55 Type V - N $42.50 $121.22 BOWLING ALLEYS Type II - 1-Hour $25.34 $ 59.16 Type 11 - N $25.34 $ 55.21 Type 111 - 1-Hour $25.36 $ 64.38 Type 111 - N $25.34 $ 60.20 Type V - 1-1 Hour $25.31 $ 43.38 CHURCHES Type 1 or 11 F.R. $37.29 $115.07 Type 11 - 1-Hour $30.28 $ 86.42 Type 11 - N $30.27 $ 82.12 Type 111 - 1-Hour $30.3I $ 93.96 Type 111 - N $30.31 $ 89.78 Type V - 1-Hour $30.31 $ 87.81 Type V - N $30.27 $ 82.59 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three **Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouses ***Deduct 20 percent for "shell only" buildings The Building Official is authorized to implement new Building Valuation Schedules approved by the I.C.B.O. 9 OCCUPANCYANDTYPE CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Valuation Schedule REMODEL COST PER SQ. FT. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS *Type 1 or 11 F.R. Type 11 1-Hour Type 111 - 1-Hour Type V - 1-Hour COST PER NEW SQ. FT. $53.70 $161.47 $38.88 $112.05 $38.88 $114.84 $38.84 $108.22 7. DWELLINGS Type V - Masonry $36.39 $112.40 Type V - Wood Frame $36.39 $107.18 Basements Semi-Finished $15.67 $ 26.91 Unfinished $15.67 $ 20.53 8. FIRE STATIONS Type 1 or 11 F.R. $42.48 $132.70 Type 11 - 1-Hour $32.43 $ 87.34 Type 11 - N $32.40 $ 82.36 Type 111 - 1-Hour $32.43 $ 95.58 Type 111 - N $32.43 $ 91.52 Type V - 1-Hour $32.48 $ 89.66 Type V - N $32.40 $ 85.02 HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY Type 1 or 11 F.R. $40.11 $120.29 Type 11 - 1-Hour $32.43 $ 97.67 Type 11 - N $32.43 $ 93.49 Type 111 - 1-Hour $32.48 $101.73 Type 111 - N $32.45 $ 97.55 Type V - i-Hour $32.45 $ 98.25 Type V - N $32.43 $ 94.88 10. HOSPITALS *Type 1 or i1 F.R. $62.39 $189.31 Type 111 - 1-Hour $52.47 $156.71 Type V - 1-Hour $48.76 $149.52 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three **Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouse ***Deduct 20 percent for "shell only" buildings ****Add 25% for hazardous occupancy or high tech The Building Official is authorized to implement new Building Valuation Schedules approved by the I.C.B.O. 10 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Valuation Schedule OCCUPANCY AND TYPE REMODEL COST PER SQ. FT. COST PER NEW SO. FT. 11. HOTELS AND MOTELS *Type 1 or 11 F.R. $39.99 $117.16 Type i 11 - 1 -Hour $37.56 $101.50 Type 111 - N $31.53 $ 96.74 Type V- 1-Hour $31.56 $ 88.39 Type V ~ N $31.53 $ 91.36 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS **** Type 1 or i i F.R. $24.20 $ 66.00 Type 11 - 1-Hour $24.15 $ 45.93 Type 11 - (Stock) $24.15 $ 42,22 Type 111 - 1-Hour $24.17 $ 50.57 Type 111 - N $24.I7 $ 47.67 Tilt-Up $24.17 $ 34.80 Type V - 1-Hour $24.17 $ 47.67 Type V - N $24,15 $ 43.61 13. JAILS Type 1 or 11 F.R. $61.15 $184.55 Type 111 - 1-Hour $57.52 $168.78 Type V - i-Hour $46.22 $126.55 14. LIBRARIES Type 1 or 11 F.R. $45.00 $135,02 Type 11 - 1-Hoar $31.53 $ 98.83 Type 11 - N $31.53 $ 93.96 Type 111 - 1-1-Hour $31.36 $104.40 Type 111 - N $31.56 $ 99.15 Type V - 1-Hour $31.56 $ 98.02 Type V - N $31.53 $ 99.09 15. MEDICAL OFFICES **** Type 1 or 11 F.R. $53.57 $138.62 Type 11 - 1-Hour $40.06 $106,95 Type 11 - N $40.06 $101,61 Type 111 - 1 -Hour $40.11 $116,00 Type 111 - N $40.06 $107.99 Type V - 1 -Hour $40.06 $104.63 Type V - N $40.06 $100.92 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three **Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouse ***Deduct 20 percent for "shell onlyY buildings ****Add 25% for hazardous or high tech occupancies The Building Official is authorized to implement new Building Valuation Schedules approved by the I.C.B.O. 11 OCCUPANCYANDTYPE CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Valuation Schedule REMODEL COSTPERSQ. FT. COST PER NEW SQ. FT. 16. OFFICES Type 1 or 11 F.R. $48.67 $123.38 Type 11 - 1-Hour $32.70 $ 82.94 Type 11 - N $32.70 $ 78.99 Type 111 - 1-Hour $32.73 $ 89.55 Type 111 - N $32.78 $ 85.60 Type V - 1-Hour $32.70 $ 83.86 Type V - N $32.70 $ 78.99 17. PRIVATE GARAGES Wood Frame $15.66 $ 28.18 Masonry $15.66 $ 31.78 Open carports/covered decks/porches $10.81 $ 19.25 Uncovered decks $10.62 $ 16.18 18. PUBLIC BUILDINGS Type 1 or 11 F.R. $55.97 $148.14 Type 11 - 1-Hour $42.50 $116.00 Type 11 - N $42.45 $110.89 Type 111 - 1 -Hour $42.54 $120.40 Type 111 - N $42.50 $116.23 Type V - 1-Hour $42.45 $110.20 Type V - N $42.45 $106.25 19. PUBLIC GARAGES Type 1 or 11 F.R. $24.20 $ 56.72 Type 1 or 11 Open Parking $24.13 $ 42.57 Type 11 - N $24.15 $ 32.48 Type 111 - 1-Hour $24.15 $ 42.92 Type 111 - N $24.15 $ 38.16 Type V -1-Hour $24.15 $ 39.09 20. RESTAURANTS *Type 111 - 1-Hour $60.74 $112.98 Type 111 - N $60.74 $109.15 Type V - 1-Hour $54.68 $103.47 Type V - N $52.05 $ 99.41 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three **Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouse ***Deduct 20 percent for "shell only" buildings ****Add 25% for hazardous or high tech occupancies The Building Official is authorized to implement new Building Valuation Schedules approved by the I.C.B.O. 12 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Valuation Schedule OCCUPANCYANDTYPE REMODEL COST PER SQ. FT. 21. SCHOOLS Type 1 or 11 F.R. Type I 1 - 1-Hour Type 111 - 1-Hour Type 111 -N Type V - 1-Hour Type V - N $60.87 $44.84 $44.84 $42.40 $42.4O $42.35 22. SERVICE STATIONS Type 11 - N Type 111 - 1-Hour Type V - 1-Hour Canopies $41.80 $41.81 $41.75 $41.66 23. STORES *Type 1 or 11 F.R. Type 11 - 1-Hour Type 11 - N Type 111 - 1-Hour Type lll-N Type V - 1 Hour Type V - N 24. THEATERS Type 1 or 11 F.R. Type 111 - 1 -Hour Type 111 -N Type V - 1-Hour TypeV-N $37.57 $33.85 $33.89 $33.93 $33.89 $33.86 $33.85 $48.67 $35.13 $34.00 $32.70 $31.48 25. WAREHOUSES** Type 1 or 11 F.R. Type I I or V-l-Hour Type 11 or V-N Type 111 - 1-Hour Type 111 - N $33.85 $16.90 $16.90 $16.90 $16.89 COST PER NEW SQ. FT. $128.99 $ 88.04 $ 94.19 $ 90.59 $ 88.27 $ 84.21 $ 77.95 $ 81.31 $ 69.25 $ 32.48 $ 95.58 $ 58.46 $ 57.18 $ 71.10 $ 66.70 $ 59.85 $ 55.33 $127.36 $ 92.80 $ 88.39 $ 87.34 $ 82.59 $ 57.30 $ 33.98 $ 31.90 $ 38.51 $ 36.65 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three **Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouse ***Deduct 20 percent for "shell only" buildings ****Add 25% for hazardous or high tech occupancies The Building Official is authorized to implement new Building Valuation Schedules approved by the I.C.B.O. 13 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Valuation Schedule Commercial Residential Sprinkler Systems EQUIPMENT AND AIR CONDITIONING $ 4.87 $ 4.06 $ 3.01 Masonry Concrete RETAINING WALLS, PER SQ. FT.(HEIGHT X LENGTH) AREA ABOVE GRADE $ 27.84 $ 24.50 The Building Official is authorized to implement new Building Valuation Schedules approved by the I.C.B.O. Address Changes $249.00 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2002 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building Permit Permit Valuation $1 - $3,OOO $77.00 $3,001- 25,000 $87.00 for the first $3,000 plus $10.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000. $25,001- 50,000 $300.00 for the first $25,000 plus $8.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000. $50,001- 100,000 $500.00 for the first $50,000 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000. $100,001- 500,000 $788.00for the first $100,000 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000. $500,001 - t,000,000 $2,609.00 for the first $500,000 plus $3.00for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000. $1,000,001- $4,440.00 for the first $1,000,000 and up plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof. PLAN CHECKING Structural and Non-Structural 85% of building permit fee for each plan submitted. Each additional identical repeat plan for multi-unit residential developments will be assessed at $22.20 each unit. Energy 30% of building perm/t fee for each plan submitted. Each additional identical repeat plan for multi-unit residential developments will be assessed at $22.20 each unit. Repeat plan checks that exceed 2 reviews will be charged an hourly rate at $55.50 per hour. 15 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Electrical Fees New Residential Buildings and Remodels that add additional square footage The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. Permit Fee $35.52 New multi-family residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three or more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other non-commercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot $ 0.06 New single and two-family residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square foot 0.07 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE New commercial buildings and completely remodeled spaces not including the Area of garages, per square foot $ 0.12 Commercial alterations and modifications to existing buildings, use the Unit fee schedule 16 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03.069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Electrical UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Remodel - No additional square footage Permit Fee Residential Appliances For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self-contained room console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP) in rating each NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Non-Residential Appliances For residential appliances and self-contained factory-wired, non-residential appliances non exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovotampere (KVA) in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases; drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Services For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1,000 amperes in rating, each For services over 600 volts over 1,000 amperes in rating, each $ 35.52 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 27.25 $ 55.50 $111.00 17 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Electrical USER FEE SCHEDULE (continued) Remodel - No additional square footage Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits, Conductors, and Special Circuits For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth Power Device/Apparatus For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatuses, as follows: Rating in horsepower (IiP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt-amperes (KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR): 1 unit 2 through 5 units, each additional 6 and over, each additional NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. $ 22.20 $ 4.44 $ 25.53 $ 44.40 $ 16.65 $ 11.10 18 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Electrical UNIT FEE SCHEDULE (continued) Remodel - No additional square footage Busways For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof Note: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20 each Additional outlets, each NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp holding devices First 20 each Additional fixtures, each For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures each For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies each $6.50 $1.11 $0.67 $i.11 $0.67 $1.11 $1.11 19 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Mechanical Fees New Residential Buildings and Remodels that add additional square footage. The following fees shall include all mechanical equipment in or on each building, or other mechanical equipment on the same premised constructed at the same time. New multi-family residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three or more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other non-commercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot $0.06 New and single and two-family residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square foot $0.07 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations and modifications To existing building, use the unit fee schedule New commercial buildings and completely remodeled spaces not including The area of garages, per square foot $0.12 Commercial alterations and modifications to existing buildings, use the unit Fee schedule 20 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Mechanical Fees UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Remodels - No additional Square Footage Permit Fee For the repair of alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, VAV boxes, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this Code. For each air-handling unit, MC units, heat pumps to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto. Does not apply to central type. NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit that is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this Code. For each air-handling unit A/C unit, heat pump over 10,000 cfm For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial-type hood For the installation of each residential hood that is served by a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air conditioning system authorized by a permit For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct For the installation or relocation of each forced air or gravity type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h $ 35.52 $ 12.21 $ 9.50 $ 16.50 $127.65 $ 9.50 $ 13.25 $ 9.50 $ 6.50 $ 16.25 21 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Mechanical Fees UNIT FEE SCHEDULE (continued) Remodels - No additional Square Footage For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h (29.3 kw) For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this Code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this Code $I3.25 $13.25 $ 6.50 $13.15 $24.25 $33.25 $49.50 $82.75 $ 9.50 22 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Plumbing Fees New Residential Buildings and Remodels that add additional square footage The following fees shall include all plumbing equipment in or on each building, or other plumbing equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. New multi-family residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three or more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other non-commercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same, per square foot $0.06 New single and two-family residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square foot $0.07 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations and modifications To existing building, use the unit fee schedule New commercial buildings and completely remodeled spaces not including The area of garages, per square foot $0.12 Commercial alteratitgns and modifications to existing buildings, use the unit fee schedule 23 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building ~ Plumbing Fees UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Remodel - No additional Square Footage Permit Fee For installation, alteration or repair of water piping water treating equipment For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, floor, area, condensate piping For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping and backflow protection therefor) For each gas piping system of one (1) to four (4) outlets For each gas piping system of five (5) or more, per outlet For each industrial waste pre-treatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen type grease traps functioning as fixture traps Kitchen type trap and/or system For each building sewer, sanitary sewer, and each trailer park sewer Storm/rainwater systems per drain For each water heater and/or vent Water service Re-pipe per fixture $35.52 $ 8.33 $ 8.33 $ 8.33 $ 5.oo $ 1.11 $16.65 $ 8.33 $19.98 $ 8.33 $ 9.99 $ 8.33 $ 8.33 24 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D - Building - Plumbing Fees UNITS FEE SCHEDULE Remodel - No additional Square Footage (continued) For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices therefor Five (5) or more, each For atmospheric type vacuum breakers/backflow not included in item 1 1 to5 over 5 each additional For each private sewage disposal system For each cesspool $12.21 $1.00 $ 9.99 $ 2.o0 $62.16 $31.08 25 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule D OTHER BUILDING INSPECTION FEES Private Swimming Pools For new private, residential, in-ground, swinmting pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each including plan check and energy. For other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirlpools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Temporary Power Service For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, fireworks stands, etc. each Inspection outside of the normal business hours (minimum charge two hours) Inspection for which no fee is specifically established (minimum charge one hour) Re-inspection - A fee may be assessed for each inspection or re-inspection when such portion of work for which inspection is called is not complete or when corrections called for are not made $500.00 $57.50 $11.00 $84.0~hr. $63.00/hr. $105.00 26 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03.069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation Recreation classes and excursion fees shall be determined as follows: Classes 1. Determine the maximum hourly rate paid to instructor. 2. Multiply the instructor's hourly rate by the number of class meetings. 3. Determine the minimum number of participants and divide into the instructor's cost. 4. Add indirect overhead percent - 32%. 5. Add 20% to establish non-resident fee. 6. Add cost for specialized equipment or supplies. Special conditions: For classes taught by contract instructors, the indirect overhead is only added to the City's percentage. Excursions 1. Transportation cost divided by the number of participants plus overhead transfer. 2. Add 20% to establish non-resident fee. 3. Add any admission cost, supplies or leadership cost. Additional factors that may be used to determine the class or excursion user fee: The total number of participants in a given activity may generate additional revenue whereby the total program cost may be reduced. Classes that traditionally have waiting lists may have the user fee increased. Programs in competition with adjacent cities or the private sector may require fees to be increased or decreased to remain competitive. 27 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation Facility Use Fee Schedule (Staff Use Only) CLASSIFICATIONS: Priority of Use Group I: City of Cupertino activities that are open to the public. Official city sponsored programs. Group 1I: Clubs with 51% resident membership, recreation programs and events with full or affiliated city co-sponsorship and open to the public. Group IH: Programs and events sponsored by Cupertino based non-profit recreation, education or community service organization with 51% resident participation. These organizations must show an official structure and status. Private, special interest or business groups for functions not open to the public. These functions would include parties, banquets, receptions, industrial conferences, senfinars, trade shows, etc. Group V: Programs and events sponsored by non-resident non-profit recreation, education or community service organization. These organizations must show official structure and status. Group VI: Cupertino Businesses using the Cupertino Room of the Quinlan Community Center for promotional and business related purposes other than negotiation or direct sale. 28 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation Quinlan Community Center ROOM RENTAL SCHEDULE PER HOUR Cupertino Room Monday - Thursday Friday- Sunday Group ~ N/A $17 Group IH $30 $80 Group IV $140 $230 Group V $50 $140 Group VI $265 $265 Classroom Group ~ N/A $12 Group l3ff $20 $60 Group IV $45 $90 Group V $25 $75 Conference Room Group H N/A $12 Group III $10 $25 Group IV $40 $60 Group V $25 $50 Security Staff Security staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility: $25.00 per hour. Overtime Fee Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 for any time up to the first half hour, and $150.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit. This applies to all City facilities. Security Deposit A security deposit shall be required for Groups III, IV, V, and VI. Security deposit is due at time of reservation. The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security deposit will be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time. Quinlan Community Center Cupertino Room- Groups IV, VI $750 All Other Rooms - Group IV $300 Group II, II, V - All Rooms $300 29 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation Monta Vista Recreation Center Creekside Park Building Room Rental Schedule Per Hour Monta Vista Recreation Center Creekside Park Building Multi-Purpose Group III N/A N/A Group 1V N/A N/A Group V N/A N/A Classroom Group IU $15 $15 GrouplV $30 $30 Group V $20 $20 Conference Room/Kitchen Group IH $15 N/A Group IV $25 N/A Group V $20 N/A Security Staff Security staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility: $25.00 per hour. Overtime Fee Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 for any time up to the first half hour, and $150.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit. This applies to all City facilities. Security Deposit A security deposit shall be required for Groups III, IV, V, and VI. Security deposit is due at time of reservation. The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security deposit will be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time. 30 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation Senior Center Room Rental Schedule Per Hour Reception Room Evenings and Weekends * Group H $12 Group l li $80 Group IV $230 Group V $140 Classroom, Conference Room, Arts & Crafts Room, Bay Room Group II $12 Group 1II $60 Group IV $90 Group V $75 *Senior Center rooms are not available for rental Monday through Thursday 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Security Staff Security staff is required when alcohol is served at any City facility: $25.00 per hour. Overtime Fee Functions exceeding the permitted reservation time shall be charged $150.00 for any time up to the first half hour, and $150.00 for every half hour thereafter. This charge will be deducted from the security deposit. This applies to all City facilities. Security Deposit A security deposit shall be required for Groups III, IV, V, and VI. Security deposit is due at time of reservation. The Department Director may also require a deposit based on the nature of an event. The security deposit will be refunded if no damage occurs, rooms are left in clean condition, and permits conclude on time. Cupertino Senior Center Reception Hall - Group IV $750 All Other Rooms - Group IV $300 Group II, III, V - All Rooms $300 31 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation OUTDOOR FACILITIES Memorial Softball Field Cupertino residents/businesses only Non-Residents Field can be reserved for a maximum of 2 hours THERE IS NO FEE FOR CURRENT SOFTBALL TEAMS PLAYING IN CUPERTINO LEAGUES Field preparation (includes dragging, watering, chalking, and bases) Field Attendant (2 hour minimum) Field Attendant is required any time lights or field preparation is requested. Lights (in the evening) Memorial Park Amphitheater Cupertino residenffResident business Non-resident/Non-resident business Memorial Park Gazebo Cupertino resident/Resident business Non-resident/Non-resident business Picnic Areas (Daily Rate) Cupertino residents Cupertino business Non-residents Non-resident business Electricity at Memorial or Linda Vista Park $25.00 $40,OO $36.50 $ 8.25/hr. $ 5.00/hr. $55.00 $75.00 $55.00 $75.00 $ 55.00 $ 75.00 $ 80.00 $100.00 $ 25.O0 32 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069 April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation BLACKBERRY FARM PICNIC GROUNDS General Admission: Weekends & Holidays ADULT (13 years and over) Resident Non-Resident $8.0O $9.OO CHILD (6 through 12) $5.00 $6.00 Group Rates: 100-500 persons 501-1,000 1,001 or more Weekends & Holidays Adult Child (13 & Older) (6-12) Weekdays Resident Non-Resident $5.00 $6.00 $4.00 $5.00 Weekdays Adult Child (13&Older) (6-12) $8.50 $6.50 $5.75 $4.75 $8.00 $6.00 $5.50 $4.50 $7.50 $5.50 $5.25 $4.25 Resident $85.00 $60.00 $140.00 $150.00 $160.00 $170.00 $180.00 Full Summer Pass Available any day the park is open: Adult (13 & Up) Child (6 to 12 years old) Family Pass (2 people) Family Pass (3 people) Family Pass (4 people) Family Pass (5 people) Family Pass (6 people) Non-Resident $110.00 $70.00 $170.00 $180.00 $190.00 $200.00 $210.00 33 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation 10-Day Pass Available any 10 days the park is open: Resident Adult (13 and older) $40.00 Child (6 to 12 years old) $32.50 Children under 6 are free when accompanied by their parents BLACKBERRY FARM GOLF COURSE Non-Resident $45.00 $36.00 Weekends Weekdays Resident Non-Resident Resident Non-Resident 9-Holes $13.00 $15.00 $I1.00 $13.00 Junior&Senior N/A N/A $10.00 $12.00 Second 9Holes (all $11.00 $13.00 $10.00 $12.00 players) All groups and tournaments pay the full ratb (Cupertino resident still applies). Staff is authorized to set merchandise fees according to current cost. BLACKBERRY FARM RETREAT CENTER Conference Room $49.95/person 34 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation BLACKBERRY FARM GOLF COURSE Annual Rate (Weekdays Only) Cupertino Residents Non-Residents Semi-Annual Rate (Weekdays Only) Cupertino Residents Non-Residents Super-Annual Rates (Good on Weekends & Holidays) Cupertino Residents Non-Residents Super-Semi Annual Rates (Good on Weekends & Holidays) Cupertino Residents Non-Residents Quick Passes (Ten-play card for the price of nine) Cupertino Resident Weekday Cupertino Resident Weekend Non-Resident Weekday Non-Resident Weekend Cupertino Resident Weekday Cupertino Resident Weekend Non-Resident Weekday Non-Resident Weekend Adults(17-61) $850 $1,000 $455 $540 $1,000 $1,125 $500 $600 $99 $117 $126 $135 $11 $13 $13 $15 Jr/Sr $775 $925 $415 $495 $1,000 $1,125 $50O $6OO $9O $117 $108 $135 $10 $13 $12 $15 35 CITY OF CUPERTINO Resolution 03-069/April 7, 2003 Fees Effective July 1, 2003 Schedule E - Recreation CUPERTINO SPORTS CENTER Day Passes Type Resident Non-Resident $7.00 $10.00 Monthly Passes One Month Single $55.00 $65.00 One Month Couple $75.00 $90.00 One Month Family $95.00 $115.00 Annual Passes One Year Single $350.00 $375.00 One Year Couple $700.00 $750.00 One Year Family $850.00 $925.00 One Year Senior $315.00 $340.00 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 1. Annual fee for Juniors (17 years and younger) of $240.00. 2. Annual fee for seniors (62 years and older) of $315.00 3. The Cupertino Tennis Club will be charged $10.00/hour per court for all C.T.C. sponsored activities other than U.S.T.A. leagues and practices. 4. All competitors in C.T.C./U.S.T.A. leagues participating at the Sports Center must purchase an annual pass. 5. An annual pass holder may purchase one block often (10) guest passes per year for $60.00. A guest must be accompanied by the pass holder who purchased the guest pass. 36 CUPEP TINO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3262 FAX: (408) 777-3366 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE SUMMARY Agenda Item ,~ Date: April 1, 2003 Subject: Adopt policy for naming city facilities. Background: At the March 17 council meeting, the City Council asked that staffdevelop draft policies, responsibilities and procedures associated with the naming of City facilities. The City of Cupertino has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City Council and guide staffin the nanfing of City Facilities, including buildings, support facilities, park sites and recreation facilities. Thus far two (2) facilities have been named after noted community individuals. First was the Quinlan Community Center after former city manager Robert Quinlan; second was the Don Brown Golf Course after former city manager Don Brown. Developing a policy and procedure to guide the naming of city facilities is imended to enable the process to be applied in an equitable, objective and consistent manner. Recommendation: Adopt the attached legislative guidelines for City Councilmembers and staff. Su,~mitted by:! l~ick Kitson Public Information Officer Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager City of Cupertino Naming of City Facilities Policy and Procedure Purpose: To define the policies, responsibilities and procedures associated with the naming of future City facilities. Background: The City of Cupertino has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City Council and guide staffin the naming of City Facilities, including buildings, support facilities, park sites and recreation facilities. Thus far, two (2) facilities have been named after noted community individuals. First, was the Quinlan Community Center after former city manager Robert Quinlan; second was the Don Brown Golf Course after former city manager Don Brown. The development of a Policy/Procedure to guide the naming of city facilities is intended to enable the process to be applied in an equitable, objective and consistent manner. Policy: General The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an easy and recognizable reference for the City's customers. Naming options will always include using a name based on the facilities geographic location. However, this policy establishes conditions for considering naming facilities based on other factors. Geographic Location Whenever possible, all city facilities will be named for their geographic location. The geographic location may be based on the identification of the facility with a specific place, neighborhood, major street, regional area of the City/or the City itself if the facility is deemed to serve the entire community or county. Other Considerations Considering names for facilities may also include a prominent topographic feature, bush or tree or any name of historic significance to the community. Individual/Organizational Name Recognition Naming City facilities is limited to individuals, families and community organizations connected with Cupertino. Naming City facilities may be considered under the following conditions: The individual, their family or a community organization has made exceptional contributions to the City, including one or more of the following: a) financial gifts: b) public service as an elected or appointed official: c) public service as a community volunteer: and d) long term sponsorship agreements. There should be a well-defined connection between with the contributions of the individual or community organization and the city facility. The significance of the contribution from the individual/organization needs to be evaluated in terms of the service impact 0fthe city facility. Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of regional or community wide significance may be considered for naming of facilities that serve the region/commtmity. Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of a particular area or neighborhood wide significance may be considered for the naming of facilities that serve areas or neighborhoods within the city, including recreational and other amenities within city parks. Procedure: At least 180 days before opening a new city facility, City Council shall direct either the Planning Commission or another appropriate commission to review and make recommendations on the naming of the City facility. The assigned commission will use this policy in recommending a name for the site or facility. The assigned commission should solicit ideas and suggestions from the community. Groups or individuals may submit recommendations for a name in writing (exhibit A). Recommendations may also come from other City boards and or commissions. All recommendations will be given the sanae consideration without regard to the nomination source. The appropriate Commission will make recommendations to the City Council. (The City Council is responsible for the final approval of the proposed name and for accepting gifts for the city.) D. Each facility will be named by a sepamte nomination process and will be evaluated by the appropriate commission. E. The FINAL decision on naming of facilities rests with the Cupertino City Council. EXHIBIT A CITY OF CUPERTINO Naming of City Owned Facilities to recognize an Individual or Organization NOMINATION FORM Nomination for consideration in the naming of a City-owned facility. Please type or print clearly and submit to the office of City Clerk 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 777-3200 Fax: (408) 777-3366 Date I. Individual/organization submitting name: Address: Telephone: II. Nominee: (circle one) Individual Organization Club 1. Name: Telephone: 2. Mailing Address.'. Zip Code: Number of Years in Cupertino area Recommended Name of Facility. Location of Facility Explanation of why this individual / organization should be considered. (This information will be used by the Commission to determine the basis for their decision.) (Use additional paper if needed). Name of Commission reviewing nomination: Date CITY OF CUPERTINO__ 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDA NO. ).~ AGENDA DATE April 7, 2003 SUMMARY: Authorize a revised public participation process for the General Plan review RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: · Authorize a revised public participation process for the General Plan review BACKGROUND: The City Council and Planning Commission held two joint study sessions (February 11 and March 4) on the administrative draft of the General Plan, to determine if any parameters in the Plan need to be changed prior to releasing the public hearing draft. The City Council expressed interest in re-evaluating some of the growth assumptions contained in the existing (1993) General Plan and in engaging the community in a discussion of growth scenarios and their impacts, among other issues (see Exhibit A). DISCUSSION: A number of community meetings and study sessions were held prior to fire releasing the administrative draft of the General Plan (see Exhibit B). The public participation program for the General Plan consisted of these meetings, the two recent study sessions, an April community meeting (since cancelled due to scheduling problems), and the upcoming public hearings associated with the General Plan review. A "Goals Committee" or similar advisory group was not appointed since the proposed changes constitute a "tune-up" from a policy standpoint, not significant new directions. Since the City Council expressed interest in engaging the community in further discussion, staff recommends that additional time and meetings be allocated to the General Plan process. Staff recommends that part of the process include providing more opportunity for broad community involvement, including selecting community members to serve on a "task force" to learn about and General Plan Public Participation Process April 7, 2003 2 discuss some of the key issues in the draft General Plan. Staff recommends that 60 community members be selected to serve on the task force (see Exhibit C). Two options are described for selecting participants; one with 45 volunteer participants and 15 City Council appointments, and the other with 45 volunteers selected by category and 15 City Council appointments. Other options of the Council's choosing are also possible; these are suggestions only. Staff does recommend, however, that the size not exceed 60 people and that the participants be organized into discussion groups not to exceed 12 persons each. That size is manageable by existing staff, whereas a larger size might require hiring facilitators, for which there is no budget. The proposed public participation process extends the General Plan approval timeline, as shown in Exhibit C, with a possible adoption date in early 2004. Enclosures: Exhibit A - Notes from March 4, 2003 General Plan Study Session Exhibit B - General Plan Meetings and Dates Exhibit C - Revised Public Participation Process Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Ste¥4 Piasecki Director of Community Development Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager G:planmng/pdrepor t/cc/ccpublic par t4cipation EXHIBIT A Notes from Planning Commission/City Council Study Session # 2 on the Administrative Draft General Plan March 4, 2003 Community Form Does the Plan flame the outside growth parameters? (Housing, Commercial, Office and Industrial potential development) · 'Relate numbers to reality'. Present the growth numbers such that they relate to growth concerns of the residents of Cupertino. For example, do numbers for commercial development mean 'moderate growth'; does the Plan support affordable housing; does the Plan support commercial development in the existing core or develop a new center; is it a slow, moderate, or an aggressive growth plan; what sites are allocated for commercial development, etc · Relate projected development with infrastructure and facility needs, such as schools. Need a Traffic Analysis, Environmental Review at this stage · Provide information on trade-offs between different choices. For example, choice between a power-retail center and lower sales tax revenues · Keep the General Plan an open, flexible document -to allow for creative projects that may arise in the future The PC/CC is okay with the numbers as outside parameters. The PC/CC wants to engage the community in a discussion of' Trade-offs Slow, moderate, aggressive growth scenarios Infrastructure impacts of new development Need for flexibility in the General Plan The PC/CC also see the need to educate the community on density · Are the building heights appropriate to the districts (3 vs. 4 vs. 5 or more stories)? · Build-in density bonuses into the General Plan to encourage beneficial uses, i.e., housing · Show areas where additional height is proposed, separate fi:om existing development - as an overlay map Take Crossroads height down to 35feet. Prepare overlay map showing where heights will change. Consider making height limits all-inclusive (for example, air- conditioning units on rooftops) Housing Opportunities · Should jobs and housing be better balanced? · Include impacts on schools from additional housing in the analysis - Conduct environmental review before going to public heating - Review impact on district and on individual schools · (Also, request staffpresence from school district at these study sessions) The PC/CC is okay with number of housing units as outside parameter. PVant school impact information before Draft Plan goes to public for review Sharing the Road · Are you willing to sacrifice some auto LOS in favor of non-auto (pedestrian and bicycle) LOS and comfort? · Council needs to discuss alternative modes of travel for school ch/ldren with the School District · Safety is an issue on arterial streets · Include an LOS Analysis in the Circulation Element · Include programs to share parking lots, use transit, guaranteed ride home for targeted areas in the city · Identify and promote walkable zones · Define your vision for walk-ability. Does it include all creek channels, private developments and all streets (e.g., Stevens Canyon Ro;ad)? · Trails for public access in targeted zones only. Evaluate the feasibility at the project level. This is a private property rights issue · Identify and promote walkable experiences in general · Prepare a strategy not just at property level. Requires a more comprehensive community plan to determine linkages at the city level Yes, sacrifice some auto LOS to improve pedestrian/bike LOS. Emphasize walkability. Consider a variety of experiences. Respect private property rights. Need comprehensive plan for trails and paths. Emphasize safety. Sustainable Community Are "green buildings" and land use practices worth the price? Are we willing to aggressively pursue other areas of sustainability, such as recycling and storm water mn-off management? · Explore other alternatives to pesticides. This issue relates to water quality · Support energy efficiency- green buildings · Develop an education section of plan for recycling and green buildings - include cost analysis · Strongly support recycling program (including extended pilot recycling of computer parts) · Conduct a market analysis and evaluate practices of neighboring cities The PC/CC is very supportive of sustainabiIity. They want the city staff to develop cost estimates for green building elements, and be sensitive to price and cost- effectiven ess Does acquisition or dedication of parklands in Rancho Rinconada, Vallco and Homestead areas, reuse of Blackberry Farm and preservation of school playing fields adequately describe the park acquisition program? · Need more variety in park types in Cupertino. Have enough ball fields · Can utilize Proposition 40 dollars for acquisition of parks. Identify State funding too ~' Include guidelines and standards for parks in General Plan to improve aesthetics and variety (including a 'dog park') · Strongly support the preservation of natural resources Emphasize the need for a variety of park types. Supportive of parkland acquisition and dedication strategies and policies. Public Comments · High density and new housing will negatively impact walkability and sustainability by increasing traffic · Develop alternative scenarios for residents to choose from - no Growth, Moderate Growth, etc. · LOS of 'E" service not acceptable for traffic conditions · Support rain water recycling · Need transit service and transportation options for residents without cars/bikes · Neighborhood cities impacts school traffic · Need ADA access improvement to businesses - walkability · 93% traffic is by cars. Need improvement to auto LOS · Mixed use projects have not been very successful elsewhere · The need to drive children to school (middle school case study) is the real issue, not the increase in student population · Improve walkability for visually impaired · Consider light-rail option, extension to Cupertino · There is a shortage of gas stations in Cupertino · Need toxic waste pick-up points in Cupertino · Annex part of San Jose between Cupertino and the freeway · Need public outreach · Prefer auto LOS improvement except around schools · Encourage walkability but not everywhere · Study the effect of new housing on schools · Traffic light at Whole Foods is an issue · Need clarity on where walkability is appropriate · Support sustainability/green building · Bike route on arterials is a safety issue - EXHIBIT B General Plan Meetings and Dates City Council Scope of Work for General Plan Review - 02/02/01 Urban design session with City Council and Planning Commission - 04/30/01 Visioning session with City Council - 06/22/01 Visioning session with City Council and Planning Commission - 07/09/01 Community General Plan Update meeting - 07/17/01 Economic Development Committee briefing - 08/15/01 PC Housing Element Study Session - 08/27/01 PC Business Interests briefing - 10/02/01 Adopted Housing Element - 10/15/01 Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee meeting - 11 / 15/01 Planning Commission Study Session on the amendment process and the major Genera1 Plan themes - 11/26/01 Fine Arts Corrrmission- 11/27/01 Land Use Element study sessions with Planning Commission - 12/10/0% 01/14/02, 02/11/02 Circulation Element/Transportation Element Study Session with City Council and Plarming Commission - 01/28/02 Environmental Resources Element Study Session with Planning Commission - 02/25/02 PC Preferred Development Alternatives Study Session with Planning Commission - 04/28/02 PC Community Congress - 05/03/02 Valley Transportation Authority with the City Council and Planning Commission - 08/19/02 EXHIBIT C CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN REVISED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS April 7, 2003 Purpose: Provide a forum for the public to discuss General Plan issues in a small group setting. Implementation: Convene a task force of interested community members to learn about, discuss and make recommendations on key issues related to the administrative draft General Plan, prior to releasing the public hearing draft. Discussion will focus on the two "drivers" of change: Community Form (development potential) and Housing Opportunities. Participants Options for selecting participants: Option 1: Select 60 participants, Fifteen of the participants would be selected by the City Council. The remaining 45 participants would be selected through an open application process. Anyone who lives in Cupertino may apply to participate in the task force. Members of the City Council or City Commissions are not eligible, since they already have a voice in the decision-making process. If more than 45 people apply, names will be drawn randomly to select 45 people. Option 2: Same as above, except categories will be established for selecting the 45 participants. Suggested categories are: Reside in one of the following sectors of Cupertino (5 participants from each sector will be appointed): Northwest: north of Stevens Creek Boulevard, west of De Anza Boulevard Northeast: north of Stevens Creek Boulevard, east of De Anza Boulevard Southzoest: south of Stevens Creek Boulevard, west of De Anza Boulevard Southeast: south of Stevens Creek Boulevard, east of De Anza Boulevard Educator (2) Employee/High tech Headquarters (2) Chamber of Commerce (2) League of Women Voters (2) Environmental Group (nominated by) (2) Major retail property representative (2) Major office property representative (2) Retail/office developer (2) Residential developer (2) Senior representative (2) Youth representative (2) At-large (3) Applicants will state for which categories they wish to be considered, and will be placed in that category if there are not multiple applicants. If there are multiple applicants for a single category, the City Council will conduct interviews to select the participant. The City Council may choose to randomly draw the names of the participants if the group is too large to interview. Public Participation Components Education: There will be an education component to the meetings, which will occur at the first meeting. Several growth scenarios will be described and discussed, and some of the most important impacts of future development will be discussed (i.e., school and traffic). Discussion Groups: Form discussion groups (five groups of 12) to discuss and make recommendations on the questions previously asked in the study sessions regarding Community Form and Housing Opportunities (or similar questions). Participants will be assigned randomly to each discussion group, except that the City Council selections will be distributed evenly among the groups, if that option is selected. If the category option is used, then the categories will be distributed evenly among the groups. Each group will select a chairperson to facilitate the discussion and to serve as a liaison to the whole group. Staff will serve as resource people and recorders. Field Trip: Travel in vans to several peninsula/south bay locations to see different types of development (mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly, different heights and densities). Recommendation: The chairpersons of each group will report back to the whole group at the last session. The report will be on the comments or consensus on the questions presented to each group. The full Cupertino community will be invited to a meeting where the discussion group comments will be presented and additional community input will be solicited. Possible schedule April 7: Request City Council authorization to solicit participants for the General Plan public participation program and schedule the public participation meetings Week of April 28: Mail applications for the 45 openings to: Residents via Cupertino Scene Block Captains Stevens Creek Kit list General Plan list Community Congress list Homeowners Association Presidents Leadership Cupertino Post application on Cupertino website May 5: City Council selects 15 participants (3 per council member) May 19: Deadline for submitting applications (for 45 participants) June 9: Drawing/selection of participations June - August: Task force meets (four discussion group meetings and one field trip). Have two additional meetings where the chairs get together off-line and exchange information on what the different groups are saying; they report back to their individual groups. Early September: All-Community meeting - review comments and recommendations of discussion groups and provide opportunity for public input. Prepare a report on the recommendations and public comments. November/December: Staff provides an analysis of the task force's comments and recommendations. City Council determines if the administrative draft needs to be amended prior to release as the public hearing draft. Begin public hearings. January/February 2004: Finish hearings, adopt General Plan amendments G:planning/genplan/CAROLYN VERHEYEN OUTLINE CUPEI TINO G~y Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDAITEM ~ Summary AGENDA DATE April 7~ 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Receive report and consider adopting a City policy on responsible contracting. BACKGROUND On March 3, 2003 the Council considered a report on various labor compliance issues with respect to the Phase II Library/Civic Center project. As part of that report, Council also considered a staff recommendation regarding Prevailing Wage requirements, including specifications to require contractors to submit certified payroll along with an obligation to the City to audit each payroll submitted with fines for non-compliance with the submittal requirement. Council accepted the staff report but decided to take no action on the certified payroll recommendation. At the conclusion of the Labor Compliance discussion, Council member Sandoval presented a proposal for a City policy that she suggested would assure that the City does business solely with responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations. On March 17, 2003, the Council received an interim report on Council member Sandoval's proposal noting that the staff would provide a report on April 7, 2003 to detail the responsible bidder provisions contained in the bid documents for the Library/Civic Center Phase 1I project and to address them in the context of Council member Sandoval's proposal. This report addresses that issue. "Responsible Bidder" and "Responsive Bid" There are two terms that are used in the bidding process and are often intermingled and/or used synonymously. They are, in fact, very different terms that refer to separate matters related to the process of receiving bids for a public works contract. A "res£onsible bidder" refers to the qualifications of a contractor, specifically the contractor's reputation, and capacity to do the work. As noted in the previous staff report, State Law currently provides for the definition of a "responsible bidder" as a bidder ".... who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract." (Public Contract Code Section 1103). A "responsive bid" refers to the sufficiency and quality of the actual bid documents submitted by a contractor in response to an advertisement for bids for a public works project. Although this term is not defined in the Public Contract Code, it is often referenced in standard specifications or bid documents wherein a bid may be deemed non-responsive because of specific errors, omissions or non-compliance with the requirements in the bid forms and/or proposals which are generally described in the bid documents. The distinction between the two terms is important because they refer to different qualifications in the bidding process. Qualification of Responsible Bidder As standard practice, in developing the construction and bidding documents for public projects, staff has included provisions for determining that iow bidders meet this definition. These include questionnaires in the bid documents to be submitted by the bidders, certifying that they conform to that requirement. Typically staff will verify the key features of these qualifications such as those noted in Council member Sandoval's proposal, i.e., proper contractor's license, bond requirements, debarment lists, etc. Also staff will check with other public agencies for which the contractor has worked to confirm the contractor's conduct on the job and quality of work. These follow-up actions are much like checking references before an offer of employment. Owing to the size and nature of the Library/Civic Center Phase II project, staff has, with the efforts of the design (SMWM Architects) and construction management (NOVA Partners) consultants, worked to develop additional language and questionnaires for the bidding documents to ensure, to the greatest extent possible, compliance with the definition of responsible bidder. It should be noted that this effort has been underway for the past several months in the preparation of the project construction and bid documents. Library/Civic Center Phase II Bid Documents The bid documents contain a variety of provisions aimed at ensuring that the successful low bidder is also a "responsible" contractor as defined by State law. The City Attorney has advised as to what the law requires and what factors that may apply to meet this test. This information is described in the attached letter from Charles Kilian, dated March 26, 2003. With respect to the Library/Civic Center Phase II Project, the following is a general list of items included in the bid package that are required to be submitted and certified by every bidder to assure that they are a responsible bidder. These documents are ail consistent with the items noted in Mr. Kilian's letter. 1. Transmittal letter describing the legal structure of the prime contractor and the roles and responsibilities of all subcontractors. 2. Audited financial statements of three most recent fiscal years to establish financial capacity of the contractor. 3. Letter from a California licensed Surety agreeing to provide the bidder with all required bonds. 4. Letter from an insurance underwriter confirming that it will provide all required insurance coverage in the required amounts. 5. Description, identification and quantification of resources to do the work including contractor licenses, facilities, equipment, safety program and quality control procedures. 6. Execution of a Non-Collusion Affidavit. 7. Resumes of key persormel proposed for the job including references for each. 8. Statement of litigation history for the past three years prior to the date of the bid opening, including named parties, nature of dispute and disposition. In addition to the above items each bidder is required to complete and submit a comprehensive "Statement of Qualification Questionnaire" which includes the following: 1. Information on licenses and liability coverage, any California contractors license revocations, default terminations and/or surety completions, or outstanding enforcement agency findings for failure to pay prevailing wages. 2. Information on safety procedures and programs and any outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings giving rise to criminal or civil penalties within two years prior to the date of the bid opening regarding workplace safety or environmental laws and/or regUlations, and information on any claims, litigation or disputes ending in mediation, arbitration or termination for cause. 3. Statements of experience on similar work by the proposed bidder and any designated subcontractors. 4. A statement of financial information including any bankruptcy proceedings or insurance terminations. These qualification requirements in the bid documents as described above are consistent with what has been proposed in terms of a policy, and in the application of the requirements is considered to be a very comprehensive evaluation of the qualities of a responsible bidder. Prevailing Wage Requirements Council member Sandoval's proposed policy includes a reference to compliance with prevailing wage laws and regulations. As noted above, the Council had previously considered a report on, among other things, prevailing wage issues. Since compliance with prevailing wage laws is, and has always been, a requirement of City public works projects, the adoption of a policy in that regard would simply confirm that requirement. However, the need for contractors to "affirmatively acknowledge" that requirement as suggested in the proposed policy is one that is addressed by the project specifications and the documents described above as part of the qualifying procedure for responsible contractors. Language on this point is included as part of the resolution for the responsible contracting policy for Council consideration. Lastly, there was a reference to the establishment of a self-funding mechanism for the enforcement of prevailing wage laws. Because of the cost associated with such an effort, borne directly by the city or through increased bid prices, the Council had previously decided not to act on a funded enfomement measure and, therefore, this item has not been included in the policy resolution. Should the Council wish to formally adopt a policy relating to responsible contracting as suggested by Council member Sandoval, staff has prepared the attached Resolution "Establishing a Policy for Responsible Contracting for Public Works Projects" for the Council's consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council accept this report and consider adoption of resolution No. 03- [~70 establishing a Policy for Responsible Contracting for Public Works Projects. Submitted by: Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 03-070 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTING FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, through its Capital Improvement Program contracts for work on Public Works Projects as defined by the California Public Contracts Code; and WHEREAS, the state law defines responsible contractor as one "...who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract."; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino desires to ensure that it does business solely with responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations, including prevailing wage requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopts the following Policy for Responsible Contracting for Public Works Projects: California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that public works contracts be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. "Responsible bidder" means a bidder who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract. This requirement also includes but is not limited to, the maintaining of all proper licenses by the contractor and its designated subcontractors, the maintaining of adequate insurance and performance and payment bonds issued by insurance companies and sureties having an established financial strength and acceptable commercial ratings, no prior history within defined time limits of disqualifications or default terminations or convictions of public statutes that would indicate the contractor is untrustworthy, and one that maintains an established program for training/apprenticeship in compliance with the California Labor Code. Consistent with the definition of "responsible bidder" described above, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder with outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings regarding prevailing wage, workplace safety or environmental laws and/or regulations within two years prior to the date of the bid opening. It is also the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder who has, within two years prior to the date of the bid opening been guilty (with respect to other public works projects) of unreasonable time delays, non-responsiveness to warranty claims, material defaults or breaches of contract. To this end, included in the bid documents for construction of public works projects shall be a contractor questionnaire and statement of qualifications, which addresses these issues, as well as other indices of past performance, which may include the assessment of liquidated dmnages and other work quality factors. Resolution No. 03-070 California law requires that prevailing wages be paid on all public works projects and it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to require complete compliance with the applicable prevailing wage statutes and to require affirmative acknowledgement of this requirement by all bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April, 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino March 3, 2003 (Revised March 17, 2003) Councilmember Sandoval Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting EXHIBIT In order to protect the citizens of the City and assure that the City does business solely with truly responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations. California law', as well as good business practices, mandates that public works projects be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Typically, "responsible" is defined as contractors who are 1. Licensed properly; 2. Adequately bonded (insured); 3. Not barred from work based on past violations; 4. maintain a training/ apprenticeship program. In addition to these definitions; it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to further define Responsible bidders as those which: 1. I:tave no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of prevailing wage statutes in any jurisdiction; 2. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of workplace safety 'Ao!ations regulations; 3. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of enviroranental laws or regulations; 4. Have a generally sound reputation among other local public agencies for xvhom they have completed contracts on schedule, on budget, and without uareasonable litigation. California law mandates that prevailing wages be paid on public works projects. This policy assures a level playing field for all prospective bidders and provides the taxpayers an assurance that public works projects are done with competent contractors employing properly trained workers. It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to 1. Require affirmative acknowledgement of this policy by prospective bidders; 2. Require complete compliance with the relevant prevailing wage statutes; ~and 3. To provide a self-funding mechanism for the local enforcement of these laws. Respectfully submitted. Dolly Sandoval ¢1 cu eKt no office of the City Attorney 10320 S. DeAnza Blvd., #1D Cupertino, CA 95014 Ph: (408) 777-3403 Fax: (408) 777-340l Mamh 26, 2003 Charles T. Kilian City Attorney Eileen Murray Assistant City Attorney Ralph Quails, Jr. Director of Public Works City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Review of Council member Sandoval's Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting Dear Ralph: On March 3, 2003, the City Council and staff received from Council member Sandoval a proposal for the development of a city policy directed toward assuring that the city does business only with responsible contractors. (A copy of the proposed policy is attached.) This letter is intended to provide you with a legal analysis and recommendations regarding this Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting. It should be noted that city staff, the city's project manager, special legal counsel, and our office, have over the last several months, developed a comprehensive set of general specifications, including those dealing with the responsibility of contractors who contract with the city for the construction of public buildings. The proposed policy correctly states that California law generally requires public agencies to award contracts to the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder, on those projects where competitive bidding is required. The California public contracts code was amended effective January 1,2002 to define a "responsible bidder" as meaning: ,..a bidder who has demonstrated the attributes of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract .... §1103 Public Contracts Code Page Two The above code section was added to the public contracts code as part of the same legislation that enhanced enforcement requirements for prevailing wage laws and added prevailing wage violations as a basis to substitute subcontractors under Public Contract Code §4107. The definition of responsible contractor in the Public Contract Code is very broad, encompassing not only specific experience and background relevant to the specific construction project, but also the attribute of "trustwodhiness" which the legislation does not define further. In light of the above statute, our office, as well as special legal counsel, have evaluated the proposed policy to be considered by the city council. The first two sentences of the proposed policy appear narrower than the applicable statute. These sentences state: "California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that the public works projects be awarded the lowest responsible bidder. Typically "responsible" is defined as contractors who are 1) licensed properly, 2) adequately bonded (insured), 3) not barred from work based on past violations, 4) maintain a training/apprenticeship program." We believe that the above language is accurate, but too narrow to fully encompass the requirements of California law. We recommend the policy language be revised to adopt the language of Public Contracts Section 1103 above described and then add additional language for clarification. This part of the Policy, then, would read as follows: California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that the public works contracts be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. "Responsible biddeY' means a bidder who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract. This requirement also includes, but is not limited to, the maintaining of all proper licenses by the contractor and its subcontractor team, the maintaining of adequate insurance and performance and payment bonds issued by insurance companies and sureties having an established financial strength and acceptable commercial ratings, no prior history of disqualifications or default terminations or convictions of public statutes that would indicate the contractor is untrustworthy, and who maintain a vigorous and established pro.qram for training/apprenticeship in compliance with the California Labor Code. Page Three The last sentence of the first paragraph of the proposed policy on "responsible" contractor has several elements that we recommend be reconsidered. This sentence states: In addition to these definitions, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to further define "responsible" bidders as those which: 1) Have no pending, outstanding or unabated violations of the work safety violation; 2) Have no pending, outstanding or unabated violation of environmental laws or regulations; 3) Have a generally sound reputation among other local public agencies for whom they have completed contracts on schedule, on budget, and without unreasonable litigation." The above requirements are certainly reasonable and intended to advance the City's best interests by providing a basis to disqualify bidders who pose a reasonable likelihood of creating problems with safety, performance or prevailing wage violation. The problem we foresee with the above requirement is that it extends to "pending" violations of prevailing wage, workplace or environmental laws and regulations, which could invite protests asserting that such violations have occurred on other projects but have not yet been discovered, investigated or prosecuted. This could render the contractor award process for the City a very extensive process of investigation of numerous other projects where the City acts as the investigator of "first resort." This type of standard could not only result in varied and far flung bid protests, but would also be a basis for a disqualified bidder to challenge the bidding process as arbitrary or capricious and not resting on sound footing. We recommend, instead, that the proposed policy define responsible bidders as excluding bidders with outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings (within, say a 2-year period) regarding violations of prevailing wage, workplace safety or environmental laws and regulations. We also recommend that the proposed policy reconsider the requirement of a "generally sound reputation among other local agencies" as this necessity involves subjective evaluations. This would render any disqualification of a contractor subject to challenge as the product of "favoritism" that could result in a very complicated and drawn out bid protest. We would recommend, instead, that the city use objective criteria with respect - Page Four to past performance, such as time delays, liquidated damages, responsiveness to warranty claims, and similar issues. As an alternative to the requirement of bidders having a "generally sound reputation among other local agencies," we recommend the proposed policy require a contractor questionnaire as a standard feature of city bidding. Staff, consultants, and our office are currently preparing a standard form to be used from the city's public works projects. We, therefore, recommend that the remaining portion of the first paragraph of the Proposed Policy read as follows: Consistent with the definition of "lowest responsible bidder" described above, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder with outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings regarding prevailing wage, workplace safety or environmental laws and/or regulations within two years prior to the date of its bid. It is also the policy of the City of Cupertino, to exclude as non-responsible any bidder who has, within two years prior to bidding been guilty (with respect to other construction lobs) of unreasonable time delays, material defaults or breaches of contract, non-responsiveness to warranty claims. To this end, included in the bid documents for the construction of public works shall be a standardized contractor questionnaire and statement of qualifications which address these issues, as well as other indices of past performance such as the assessment of liquidated damages and other work quality factors. The second prong of the responsibility standard is an affirmative, contractor funded prevailing wage compliance program. We do not see any difficulties or legal impediments to this requirement. Appropriate requirements for a self-funded enforcement mechanism are legal. We view the primary issue for the city council's consideration is the cost that a self- funded enforcement program might add to contractor's bids. These costs issues are economic, not legal, in nature and should probably be addressed by your office. Page Five Hopefully, this letter will provide you with a review of potential issues, options and costs of the Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting. I will be happy to answer any questions staff or council may have regarding these comments prior to the next city council meeting. Sincer.~y, ,~ J Charles T. Kilian CTK/dej Enclosure cc: Dave Knapp City Council Members City Clerk March 3, 2003 Councilmembcr Sandoval Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting In order to protect the citizens of the City and assure that the City does business solely with truly responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations. California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that public works projects be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Typically, "responsible" is defined as contractors who are 1. Licensed properly; 2. Adequately bonded (insured); 3. Not barred from work based on past violations; 4. maintain ~ training/ apprenticeship program. In addition to these definitions, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to further define Responsible bidders as those which: 1. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of prevailing wage' statutes in any jurisdiction; 2. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of workplace safety violations; 3. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of environmental laws or regulations; 4. Have a generally sound reputation among other local public agencies for whom they have completed contracts on schedule, on budget, and without unreasonable litigation. Califomia law mandates that prevailing wages be paid on public works projects. This policy assures a level playing field for all prospective.bidders and provides the taxpayers an assurance that public works projects are done with competent contractors employing properly trained workers. It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to 1. Require affirmative acknowledgement of this policy by prospective j0idders; 2. Require cornplete compliance with the relevant prevailing wage statutes; and 3. To provide a self-funding mechanism for the local enforcement of these laws. CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (468) 777-3~33 AGENDA ITEM 26 ~q PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA DATE April 7~ 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT SUBJECT AND ISSUE Resolution Adopting a City Policy on Responsible Contracting - Revised Resolution BACKGROUND Item 26 on the April 7, 2003 Council Agenda included a Resolution for the Council's consideration on the above subject that was distributed with the Agenda Packet. The Resolution in the Agenda packet attached to the staff memo was, unfortunately, an earlier draft was inadvertently included with the packet. The correct Resolution is the one attached to this Supplemental Memorandum. The only revision to the Resolution was the inclusion of the phrase "...giving rise to civil or criminal £enalties..." in paragraph 2 of the body of the policy statement in the Resolution. Ail other wording is identical. Please discard the version of the Resolution that was attached to the agenda memo and attach this one instead. Staff apologizes for any confusion that this inadvertence may have caused. The staff Recommendation in the Agenda Memo for Item 26 remains the same. Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 03-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTING FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, through its Capital Improvement Program contracts for work on Public Works Projects as defined by the California Public Contracts Code; and WHEREAS, the state law defines responsible contractor as one "...who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract."; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino desires to ensure that it does business solely with responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations, including prevailing wage requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopts the following Policy for Responsible Contracting for Public Works Projects: California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that public works contracts be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. "Responsible bidder" means a bidder who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract. This requirement also includes but is not limited to, the maintaining of all proper licenses by the contractor and its designated subcontractors, the maintaining of adequate insurance and performance and payment bonds issued by insurance companies and sureties having an established financial strength and acceptable commercial ratings, no prior history within defined time limits of disqualifications or default terminations or convictions of public statutes that would indicate the contractor is untrustworthy, and one that maintains an established program for training/apprenticeship in compliance with the California Labor Code. Consistent with the definition of "responsible bidder" described above, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder with outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings regarding prevailing wage, workplace safety or environmental laws and/or regulations giving rise to criminal or civil penalties, within two years prior to the date of the bid opening. It is also the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder who has, within two years phor to the date of the bid opening been guilty (with respect to other public works projects) of unreasonable time delays, non-responsiveness to warranty claims, material defaults or breaches of contract. To this end, included in the bid documents for construction of public works projects shall be a contractor questionnaire and statement of qualifications, which addresses these issues, as well as other indices of past performance, which may include the assessment of liquidated damages and other work quality factors. 4. California law requires that prevailing wages be paid on all public works projects and it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to require complete compliance with the applicable prevailing wage statutes and to require affirmative acknowledgement of this requirement by all bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April, 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPER TINO PARKS AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: April 7, 2003 SUBJECT Set a public hearing for a General Plan amendment and zoning change on a portion of city property on Stevens Creek Boulevard, specifically the Blue Pheasant Restaurant and appurtenant parking, from General Plan designation Public Park/Recreation, to Planned Commercial (or another zone as deemed appropriate by the City Council). BACKGROUND The Cupertino Municipal Code Section 20.02.025 requires City Council authorization prior to initiating consideration of a General Plan amendment. In this case, the city is also the owner of the property so Council authorization is needed before commencing Planning Commission review. The General Plan designation for the property is currently Public Park/Recreation. The current lease of the Blue Pheasant expires on March 31, 2004. The lessee would like to renew the lease. The Blue Pheasant was a nonconforming use when the city purchased it. The city observed the conditions of the contract of sale of Blackberry Farm, which required renewal of the Blue Pheasant lease for a minimum of ten years. The ten-year renewal expires March 31, 2004. At a meeting on November 18, 2002, the City Council stated that the lessee should obtain a use permit before renewing the lease. The lessee contacted the planning department in a timely manner to start the process of obtaining the necessary permits to continue operation of both the restaurant and bar. DISCUSSION The current land use/zoning designation allows for some accessory uses within a public park, and while food service is interpreted as allowable, operation ora cocktail lounge is not. The operation of the restaurant/bar predates the city's annexation of the area. Residents of surrounding neighborhoods have questioned the appropriateness of a bar at that location, leading to the Council's decision to ask the operator to apply for a use permit. Amendment/zoning Change for Blue Pheasant April 7, 2003 Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS THAT MUST BE MADE FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT To initiate an amendment, the City Council must find that a proposed amendment will benefit the city and is compatible with the existing goals and policies of the General Plan and the amendment should meet at least one of following three criteria: 1. The proposal appears to support the existing General Plan goals and objectives. The proposal represents an unforeseen land use trend that has not been previously considered. The existing General Plan policy, which precludes the proposal, is based upon outdated or inaccurate information. Staff believes that the request by the operator of the Blue Pheasant would fall under this category since the business was in existence prior to the city's annexation of the property, General Plan designation, and acquisition. Initiation: Staff believes that there is sufficient cause to consider an amendment to the land use map of the Cupertino General Plan to change the land use designation of the parcel from Parks/Recreation to Planned Commercial. This would be consistent with the pre-annexation use of the property. Processing: The processing steps for a General Plan amendment are: A. City Council initiates consideration of a General Plan amendment at a regular ineeting. Planning Commission holds an advertised public hearing to discuss the amendment and makes a recommendation to the City Council. In this case, the public hearing will include the use permit for the applicant's proposal and the rezoning. The City Council holds an advertised public hearing to approve or deny the Planning Commission recommendation. If the City Council makes a 'substantial modification" to the recommended amendment that was not discussed by the Planning Commission, the item must return to the Planning Commission (California Government Code 65356). Timing: This process typically takes six months and should be completed before the lease renewal discussions commence. The lease expiration date is March 3 I, 2004 and the Blue Pheasant owner is asking that we address this issue now. Amendment/zoning Change for Blue Pheasant April 7, 2003 Page 3 of 3 Fiscal impact: The net revenue to the city for rental of the Blue Pheasant (rent minus expenses) is $20,000 per year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize a public hearing for a General Plan amendment/zoning change for the Blue Pheasant site if it wishes to continue to lease the facility as a restaurant and cocktail lounge. Council authorization to consider change of the land use designation is necessary prior to entering into lease renewal discussions with the owner/operator. SUBMITTED BY: Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director Parks and Recreation Department Steve~aseckl, Director Community Development Department APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: David W. Knapp City Manager g:\parks and recreation admin\blue phcasant~rezoning blue pheasant 040703.doc DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1916 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING CHAPTER 11.08.270 RELATED TO SKATEBOARDING AND ROLLER SKATING AT THE CIVIC CENTER PLAZA WHEREAS, in 2002 the City Council adopted Ordinance 1898 to permit skateboarding in certain areas of the Civic Center Plaza; WHEREAS, in 2003, demolition began in preparation for construction of a new library and plaza; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby ordains that Chapterl 1.08.270 is amended to read as follows: 11.08.270 Prohibition of skateboarding and roller skating It is unlawful and subject to punishment in accordance with Section 11.08.280 of this chapter, for any person utilizing or riding upon any skateboard, roller skates or any similar device to ride or move about in or on any public property when the same property has been designated by the City Council and posted as a "No Skateboarding or Roller Skating Area.." The following is established as a no skateboarding or roller skating area: Civic Center Plaza (City Hall/Library). However, skatebe~fiing mn~/er miler skating is a!!ewed This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 17th day of March 2003, and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of April 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CUPERTINO_ City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 77%3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENOAITEM 3~ Summary AGENDA DATE April 7, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE April 2003 - Monthly Status Report - Cupertino Civic Center and Library Project BACKGROUND Proiect Pro~ess The project is being constructed under two separate contracts, one for the demolition and site grading (Phase I) and the other for the new Library and Community Hall buildings and the Civic Center Plaza (Phase H). The Phase I contract is now approximately 40% complete. The contractor is continuing the grinding up of the old concrete materials which will be recycled for use as part of the fill in the plaza and the old library basement. The demolition of the library building is now complete. Backfilling and grading the library basement is underway along with the grading and compaction of the plaza. The Phase I work is on schedule for completion in June 2003. As reported last month, the Phase II bid package is on schedule and the 100% construction documents have completed the permit/plan-checking process. The final bid documents, including all corrections from the plan check process are being packaged for printing and distribution to the prospective bidders. The first advertisement of the bidding of the construction contract for Phase II is now planned for mid-April 2003, to ensure the completion and opening of the facilities in October of 2004. Budget Summary Program Budget (Library, Plaza & Community Hall) (Less) Community Fund Raising Commitment (FF&E) $25,500,000 (1,200,000) Balance Project Budget (Approved Aug 2001) $ 24,300,000 Budget Status Summary Project Budget $24,300,000 Budget estimates: Architectural Consultants - Design 2,450,000* Architectural Consultants - Construction 650,000* Construction Management (CM) Consultants 900,000 Specialty Consultants (AV, GeoTech, etc.) 300,000 Temporary Library 500,000 Phase I Construction Contract 475,000 Phase II Project 19,025,000' Total Project Estimate $24,300,000 *The cost of the Architectural services has increased slightly to a total of $3,100,000 anticipating the final amendment of $650,000 to the Architects contract for their continued design and architectural review during construction. Also the Phase II Project Budget has been revised to $19,025,000. The total budget remains the same. In addition to the value for all add-alternates of $350,000 reported to Council last month, staff had also reduced the cost estimate by approximately another $915,000 in value engineering (VE) reductions to ensure that the final project estimate, along with the construction contingency would be within the Phase II budget of $19,025,000. The list of value engineering reductions that reduced the cost estimate is attached. The cost reductions are as follows: 95% Construction documents estimate Value Eng/neering Reductions Add Alternates $20,275,000 (915,000) (350,000) Phase II Project Estimate $19,010,000 As staff has previously advised the Council, if the construction bids are sufficiently low, staff will first recommend that the add alternates, in priority order, be included in the project. Secondly, the priority value engineering reductions ($345,000) noted on the attached list will also be recommended for inclusion back into the project as the low bid may allow. Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. K_napp City Manager Attachment - Value Engineering Reductions City of Cupertino - Library/Civic Center Phase II Pro[ect List of Value Engineering (VE) Proiect Cost Reduction Items VE Items recommended to be added back into the project as the low bid may allow: Priority Description Cost Reduction in Audio Visual Equipment $ 150,000 Reduce number of future power outlets 15,000 Reduce number of future tele-data outlets 30,000 Reduce quantity of trees throughout site 25,000 Delete wireless communication infrastructure 40,000 Less expensive millwork finishes/materials 15,000 Total "add backs" $ ' 275,000 VE Items to reduce cost not recommended for add-back Replace stone benches with wood benches in Plaza Substitution of lower cost roof metal Elimination of mast lighting in plaza Substitution of lower cost aluminum wall Substitute exterior cement panels for brick facade Substitute concrete for minor concrete pavers 70,000 $ 360,000 15,000 30,000 150,000 15,000 Total other VE reductions $ 640,000 Total for all VE Reductions $ 915~000 CITY OF CU?E INO AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Friday, March 28, 2003 4:15 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. NEW BUSINESS 1. Discuss the City of Cupertino's continued participation with the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA), and consider other available options. ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk's office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance o.~ the meeting. CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408} '/77-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. I Meeting Date: March 28, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Discuss the City of Cupertino's continued participation in the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA) and consider other available options. BACKGROUND SVACA currently provides animal services in the areas of field, shelter and licensing to the City of Cupertino and six other valley cities. This year the cities of Cupertino, Sunnyvale and Los Gatos performed a financial analysis on SVACA's projected costs of operating and building a shelter. As a result of this analysis, our cities requested that SVACA investigate other sheltering options in lieu of a new building, and Sunnyvale and Cupertino requested proposals for animal services from other entities. The city has until March 31, 2003, to inform SVACA of our continued involvement with the Authority. Several things have changed in the past month as follows: 1. The JPA is currently in a state of flux. The City of Sunnyvale, representing 32.42% of the total, will not continue with SVACA as of July 1, 2003. This will result in a redistribution of costs to the remaining agencies. (Our cost estimate for 2003/04 is attached.) In addition, the composition of the seven-member board will change. Sunnyvale has 2 voting members, and with redistribution Cupertino will likely have a voting member. 2. The Board has decided to re-think the size and service level of the proposed facility and look at other options. 3. The Board has guaranteed the member cities that a shelter scenario will be flushed out no later than September 30, 2003 and that no expenditures will be incurred in conjunction with building a shelter, including plans and architectural renderings. Therefore, no shelter commitment is required for fiscal year 2003/04. EXHIBITS BEGIN HERE Proposed Amendments to draft Resolution 03-070 In Section 2 and 3, substitute "two years" with "five years". Add a new section 4 (making the current section 4 to become section 5) as follows: The City of Cupertino shall require bidders to disclose all complaints, charges, and investigations related to public works projects over the preceding five years. Notwithstanding the provisions above pertaining to disqualifications, default terminations, and convictions of public statutes, the City may weigh a sustained pattern of violations of environmental, workplace safety, and other public statutes as an indication of the trustworthiness of the prospective bidder and therefore such a pattern may be used to determine whether a bidder is responsible. Add a new section 6' (self-funded enforcemenI tnechan~.~ ,/ ~e ~ 7¥~ ~ The City shall provide for the enforcement of ~-,;5 ~e(,llcyThroughout the duration of a public works contract. Any party may level a complaint alleging a violation of this policy with the office of the Director of Public Works. After providing a deposit or bond sufficient to pay for the investigation, the complaint shall be promptly investigated by the City staff. Upon the conclusion of this investigation, an initial determination shall be provided to both the complainant and the target of the investigation. If the parties mutually agree to accept the determination of the City staff, the losing party will pay the costs of the investigation. If the parties dispute the findings of the City staff, a third party arbitrator will be appointed to review the complaint and the materials and results of the staff investigation and shall provide a final determination. The costs of the arbitrator and any other costs associated with the ongoing investigation will be paid by the losing party. A complaint filed under this provision shall not impair the contractor's obligation to continue the project through to completion. DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-( ^ SOL, T O ¢O C L IT ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR RESPONSIBLE CONT PROJECTS WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, through its Capital Improvement Program contracts for work on Public Works Projects as defined by the California Public Contracts Code; and WHEREAS, the state law defines responsible contractor as one "...who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract. ' and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino desires to ensure that it does business solely with responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations, including prevailing wage requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopts the following Policy for Responsible Contracting for Public Works Projects: California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that public works contracts be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. "Responsible bidder" means a bidder who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract. This requirement also includes but is not limited to, the maintaining of all proper licenses by the contractor and its designated subcontractors, the maintaining of adequate insurance and performance and payment bonds issued by insurance companies and sureties having an established financial strength and acceptable commercial ratings, no phor history within defined time limits of disqualifications or default terminations or convictions of public statutes that would indicate the contractor is untrustworthy, and one that complies with the California Labor Code regarding apprenticeship training. Consistent with the definition of "responsible bidder" described above, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder with outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings regarding prevailing wage, workplace safety or environmental laws and/or regulations giving rise to criminal or civil penalties, within two years prior to the date of the bid opening. It is also the policy of the City of Cupertino to exclude as non-responsible any bidder who has, within two years prior to the date of the bid opening been guilty (with respect to other public works projects) of unreasonable time delays, non-responsiveness to warranty claims, material defaults or breaches of contract. To this end, included in the bid documents for construction of public works projects shall be a contractor questionnaire and statement of qualifications, which addresses these issues, as well as other indices of past performance, which may include the assessment of liquidated damages and other work quality factors. EXHIBIT To: Cupertino City Council From: Dolly Sandoval Date: April 3, 2003 ~PR - 7 2003 3UPERTINO CITY CLERK RE:Item 26 - ro osed Res onsible Con~ I am pleased to see the significant progress by staff towards addressing my proposal. The language proposed by the City Attorney and Public Works Director are in several ways an improvement over my initial draft. I am hopeful that as we discuss this item, we can consider additional measures to better protect the interests of Cupertino residents from disreputable contractors on public works projects. I will first address the major points of difference I have with the proposed resolution (03- 070) language, and then propose a set of amendments to the resolution. 'Pending' violations: Section 1: My original proposal attempted to protect Cupertino from bidders who had "pending" complaints. The staff-prepared resolution only allows bidders with actual convictions, default terminations, or disqualifications to be deemed non-responsible. I believe that this sets up a serious vulnerability for the City that we ought to correct. It is my observation that most commercial disputes are lengthy in duration, and rarely adjudicated to the point of a final resolution, but rather the parties most often "settle out of court" to avoid 'conviction' and reduce litigation costs. Given the choice, would we want to do business with someone who had a sustained pattern of environmental, workplace safety, and other violations? Under the staff-prepared resolution, we might find (too late) that we have awarded a bid to a contractor who has had, over their last two public works projects, 10 serious OSHA violations, 5 environmental violations, and 25 prevailing wage infractions and yet had not ever been 'convicted'. If we instead require full disclosure, and reserve the right to weigh a pattern of behavior, we can enable staff to fully evaluate prospective bidders. Interestingly, no such "conviction" requirement is placed on a contractor for time delays or shoddy workmanship. If the City staffcan objectively deem a contractor "guilty" of those problems, surely they can objectively discern a pattern of shirking environmental, workplace safety, and prevailing wage statutes, as evidenced by an unusually large number of pending complaints or matters settled against the contractor without a formal conviction. Section 2 (and 3): The staff-prepared resolution allows us to exclude bidders with "outstanding convictions or enforcement agency findings" over the previous two years. Given the lengthy duration of many disputes, I believe five years would be more prudent in order to protect the City. Proposed Amendmems to draft Resolution 03-070 In Section 2 and 3, substitute "two years" with "five years". Add a new section 4 (making the current section 4 to become section 5) as follows: The City of Cupertino shall require bidders to disclose all complaints, charges, and investigations related to public works projects over the preceding five years. Notwithstanding the provisions above pertaining to disqualifications, default terminations, and convictions of public statutes, the City may weigh a sustained pattern of violations of environmental, workplace safety, and other public statutes as an indication of the trustworthiness of the prospective bidder and therefore such a pattern may be used to determine whether a bidder is responsible. Add a new section 6: (self-funded enforcement mechanism) The City shall provide for the enforcement of this policy. Any party may level a complaint alleging a violation of this policy with the office of the Director of Public Works. After providing a deposit or bond sufficient to pay for the investigation, the complaint shall be promptly investigated by the City staff. Upon the conclusion of this investigation, an initial determination shall be provided to both the complainant and the target of the investigation. If the parties mutually agree to accept the determination of the City staff, the losing party will pay the costs of the investigation. If the parties dispute the findings of the City staff, a third party arbitrator will be appointed to review the complaint and the materials and results of the staff investigation and shall provide a final determination. The costs of the arbitrator and any other costs associated with the ongoing investigation will be paid by the losing party. An Advisory IViessage to the City Government of Cupertinol The growth and developmcnt of t]~ cit~ of Cupertino are co~ro[tC~t by a C-~eral Plm~ which is UlXl~d approxit~'~ely every 10 y~xs. 1~ the past. the tit7 oR%ials have repeatedly allowed e~ceptions to the ~ p~3 to favor developments a~d to damage thc q,~i~y of rcsidca~ ne~hborhoods. Reccndy, exceptions to t~e Cj~rai plan v~cr¢ made m order to domina~ thc com~ o£ Dc Anza Blvd. a~d StevcaS Cr~k with the.very hrg¢ CTprcss Hotd a~d Vero~ i~ the process of bcfl~g updated with a new ~ Plan -- scheduled W be Apanmems. Th~ cu~cat C~ncra] ?la~ is Cit7 C0uncil a~d thc pl~.i.~ Co..~ssi~a ar~ actively co~side:~g compk~l this summer. Flow~vo-r th~ Cu!~rtino - more ~xceptions to th~ ~xisting C_~neral Plan bdOl~ th~ n~w on~ is compl~l. If ~ ~ ~xccptions would permit uncksirabl¢ d~v¢lopm~t to be approval now, inste~l of waiting ttnfil thc public e~n giv~ their i~put to I1~ n~v G~ncial _Some par~,',,l*r ~.amDies: · On Marci~ 24~, tb~ planning C,~,,,,~,,~m ~tl b~ ca~s~ o~ an ~xc~u. o~ ~ the ~ Plan to allow mil ~ and ~.donsi~- ~ m ~ ar~a of T°wn C~r' comnussion has ask~ thc Council to ~a~d th~ ~ Plan m allow tall buildings and high~.'~' · plannlnE Slc'v~s Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that ~ d~w¢lopmm~s would adversely affect demsity, tint. c, cong~sti0n, air quality, nnfl intpa~ The Coac~t C~izeas of C~ivertiao ~rR~i~ ce. Il for thc Cit~ C.~e~.~t ~ot to ~Ilo~ ~.~ sl~-eial excet ~dsting General plan until the new one is complete~ My signature below affirm, s my suploort for this reques~ Printed Name 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. ~>/~ ~'~ 16. 17. 18. Address, A Message to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and developmenX of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, ~he City officials have repeatedly gone against the rules in the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the comer of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being replaced with a new General Plan, to ~e completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Comnaission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Plan. Some Particui~ · Council and Planning comrmssion are considering approving an exception to the C~eral Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of the City Center. · Planning comrmssion has asked the Council to amend the Genei-al Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completed My signature below affirms tn), s~tpport for this request. Printed Name S!gnature Address (Optional) · ]~,,oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertin The growth and devclopmC~ of thc ciW of Cupert~0 ~rc controlled by a Ge~.~ Plan. which is updat~ approx~Iely allowed except~ions to the ~ Plan to f~vor in the past, ~he City offlcials have r~llY exce~i0~s m the Genial Plan v:,~er¢ eve~ 10 yearS~nd to damage the ~,al~y of reside~ neighborhoods. Rece~Xly, developments Anza Blvd. a~d Stevens Creek w~th th~ v~y large Cypress Hotel and Verona in order to don~a~ ~ com~ °f De The current C~nera~ Plan is i~ the prOCess of ~eing ulxla~ wrr~ a ~ ~ Plan -- scheduled tz be Apm'~e~- Howev~ the Cuper~o C~ ¢oun~ and ~he Planni~g Commis~m m'e activay consid~ng undesirable deve.2merment to be approv~xl now. instead of vcamn, untiJ the pu~l~lic can g~v¢ their mPut t° the new G~mer~l completed this to the existing General P~an befor~ t~ new one ~s completecl. If enacted,~ ~xcepfions would perm~ more excepfiotm ....... ?lan. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 16. 17. 18. *An. Advisory tessage to the City Government of Cupertino; growth and development of tIae city of Cutnrtino am controllect by a General Plan, which is ulxtated appr0xilllate{Y d~velopmCnIs and to damage u~ ~I~' ,L~ v - dormna~ the corn~ o£D~ AnTa Blvd. and Stevens Cr~k with the v~¢ large Cypress Hotel and Vcrm'~ m order to Thc curr~ Csmcral Plan is in th~ process of bein8 upda~ with a n~w G~ml Plait -- ~d to b~ Apar~n~is. l-iow~r th~ Cul~nlino Cit~ Cotmcil and th~ Planni~ Commission am activeJy co~i~inS compl~ figs summer. · _ . .~o ~i~in~ ~ Plan before th~ new on~ is complCcd. If ~ tl~ ¢xc.~fions w0Cd 1~rmn more ¢xccpu~ ~ ,~ .... of ~aiii~ until the public e~n tiv¢ ~ i~put to ~1~ n~ General undesirable d~velopment to be appro~l now, Plan. ·Olt March 24~. the plamm~ Ca,,,,i~s~ ~4jl b~ crm~d~mg approvat o£ a~ excepu, oa m d:~ C.~I PLan l° all°~' r~tl imtildin~ a~d hish-d~asity ~ m the arm °f T°vcn C~r' · planninS CO~m~ssio~ I~s ~ked th~ Council to a=~d d~ ~ Plan to allow tall buildings and hi~h~,'~ apanme~ alon8 Stevens ct~k ~rom De A~a Blvd. to I4is4~vcay 85. We a~ conc~'n~d ~ ~ d~v¢lopmeubs would adversely affect d~sity, tra~c, col~l~o~ a~r quality, a~d impact n~i~hborhood schools. 17~e Conc~'ne~ Cigz~s of Cut~gao urg~tly call for the Ch~ ~nr,~-~t not to all~ ~.~ special ~1~''~ns to tie ~ng Gen~'al Pla~ u~gl ~e n~' one is co~l~t My slgn~ure belo~ a~ r~ ~rC,or~ fo~ t~ reqU~. a~_e ~ Address 3. ' An Advisory Message to the City Government of CupertinOi The growth ~nd development of ~he city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated appmxfl~nately every 10 yeax~. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the Geaeral Plan to favor l~.:'~e developments and to damage tl~ q_~eli~ of ~esidential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the ~ Plan v:¢~re m~de in ord~ to dominato the com~ o£De ),n?a Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very la~ge Cypress Hotel and Veroxm Apartmems. ~ current General Plan is intbe process of being ulxtated ~ a nv~ Gen~ Plan -- scheduled lx) be completed this sm~-aer. Howev,~-r the Cupertino City Council and the planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the exL~i-g Cmmral Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be a~proved now, instead of v~ting until the public can give their input to ~ new G~neral Plan. Some psi~ir-I~r F'rgml)les: · On Mazcb 24~. ~ P~ C ....... ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ro~ of ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ P~ to ~' ~ ~dlng~ ~ hi~ ~ m ~ ~ Of T~ . Pla~mg c~i~ ~ ~ ~ C~~ m ~d ~ ~ P~ m ~°w ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ S~ Cr~k ~m ~ ~ Blvd. m ~y 85. We ~ mn~ ~ ~ ~e~p~ wo~d ~ely ~ d~q~, ~c, ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ Conc~ C~s of ~ao ~rg~ly ~l f~ the C~ ~n~t not to a~ ~y ~iM ~c~a$ to the ~g G~al ~n u~ ~ n~ one ~ ~ My signmure bM~ a~ ~ F~ ~' ~ : p~d N~e ~, , ~ Addr~s 3. 14./ 17. An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertinol · are controUed by a General Plan, which is updated appro~tely The growth and developme~ of the city of Cupertino exceptions to the Geaeral Plan m favor larvae every l0 years. In the past, the City oORcials have repeatedly allowed developments and to damage thc q~,ality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan v~cre made in order to dominm,~ thc com~'r of De/~nTa Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verolla Apartments. The current Cnmeral Plan is in tbe process ofbe~ng uI~-ate~ with a new Crmeral plan -- sdgdul~d Ix~ be completed this stumf~r. Howov~'r the Cupertino City Council and the plannln$ Commission are actively consi~ng even more exceptions to the ~,~sl~g General Plan before the new one is completed, ff enact~ ~ ~xc,~ous would[ permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waithag until the public can give their input to file new G.~neral Plan. Some Particular Examoles: · On March 24~. d~ planm~ag Cv'"m;e'sio~ will be cnn~i&~xmg .a!:~Pr°vai °f a'n excepuc~ to the Generai Plun X° all°w r~l builai-g~ and ~,i~-de~i~y aparw,,,-~ m'dae area of Town Cemer. · pD-~mg Co~-mioo haz asked the Council to ame, d the Gcnc~ Plan to allow tall buildings ami high..d~.n,~ity apa.rlme~ along Stevens Creek from De Pmza Blvd. to I4iEhway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, tragic, cungesuo~, air q, ml~, aad mt.pact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City G~,evnment not to allow any special excetm".ons to the eaisting General Plan until t~e new one is completed My signature belo~ affirms my support for thh requ~ Printed Name 6. o 11. 12. 13. 14. 16. ]7. r 18. An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertinol Th= growth and devclopm~ of the cit~ of Cupertino arc controlled by a General p!an~ which is UlX~ated app~xkx~ately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the G~u~d pla~ to favor lar~'~e developments and to damage th~ qualRy of r=sidenfiol neighborhoods. Recently, exczptions to the General Plan v~er¢ made m order to domma~ th= comer o£De ,~,nT~ Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verozm Apartmenls. The current C,~meral Plan is in the process 0fbein~ updated with a new General Plan -- sch~uled Ix) b~ completed this smm~r. HoweV~ the Cupertino Cit~ Council and the plnnnlnE Commissi~ a~= actively c0nsidm~nE even more exceptions to the existing C~leral Plan before thc new one is complet~i. If ¢mact~ ~ ~'xC, elYdons woulg[ permit undesirable devclopment to be approved now, instead of waitin~ until the public can give their input to {he n~w G.~neral Plan. Some ?attic--Iht Exlmules: · On Maxch 24% ll~ planmX~ C,,,,,,~',i~mon will be ca~s~d~Tmg approvat °f an exc'=tm°n ~° l~be C''-xm=al Plar~ X° all°w tall bull,tin~ and high-densilY apanme,~ in th= zrea of Town Cen~r. · pl~n~mg Commission has asked the Council to ammd the Guneral Plan to allow Udl buildings and high-a~n,=fixy apartmellts along Stevens Creek f~om De AnT~ Blvd. to I-li~ohway 85. We a~ concerned that the~ d~velopmenls would adversely mt=Fect d~sity, Wa~fic, congesu~, ~ quality, and ir~qoact The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to ~ arsy special ¢xcept~ons to the ex,lng General Plan until t~e ne~ one is complete~ My signature below affirms rny support for this requ~ Signature 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 16. 17. 18. An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan tO favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona ApartmentS. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupeffino City Council and the Planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Plan. Some Particular Examples: ~ On March 24', the Planning Commission will be considering approval of an exception to the General Plan to , allow tall buildings and nigh-density apartmentS in the area of Town Center. Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartmentS along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completea[ My signature below affirms my support for this request. Signature Address Printed Name 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. O~.~Is ~o~6 23. ~,t~ ~J'~t~. t~,- 24. I ,n~ ~ 25. An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan to favor la~ge developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Plan. Some Particular Examples: · On March 24~', the Planning Commission will be considering approval of an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the ~ea of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertiao urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completecL My signature below affirms my support for this request. Printed Name 6. Signature Address o 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. An Advisory Message to the City Government Of Cupertino The growth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the comer of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Commission ara actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Plan. ~ome Particular Examolea: · On March 24~, the Planning Commission will be considering approval of an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing Genera/Plan until the new one Is completed. My slgnatura below affirms my support for this reques~ Printed Name ~Siflnature~- Address '12. ~7. ~8. 20. 2~. 22. 23. 24. 25. cA An Advisory Message to the City Government Cupertino The growth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very la~ge Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Plan. Some Particular Examples: · On March 24m, the Planning Commission will be considering approval of an exception to the General plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special excgptions to the existing General Plan until the new oae is cotnpleted My signature below affirms my support for this request. Printed Name Signature/~ Address 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. An Advisory Message to the City Govemment of Cupertin The growth ~,a develop~ of th~ city of Cupertino a~ co~trolkxl by a C-c~ral Plan, which m uixtated appro~x~atc y d~velopm~ and to damage the q,~li~ of rezidenfial neighborhoods...Re~ntl, y, ~pt~ ~o~s to ~ ~ '.~. ~.~.lfm v?re in order to do~in~te the corn~ of De AnTa Blvd. and Stevens Creek w~ t~e v~y mrge ~ypre~ rlot~ aaa vero~ Apamne~. The current General Plan is in ~he process of being ulxtated wi~ a new Geno'al Plan -- scheduled ~o bc gol~pleted this summer. However the Cupertino City Coull~il alld th~ plnnnln~o Ccnmu~ssioll al'¢ actively consid~ng even more exc. q~ons to thc existing General Plan b~fom thc new one is compl~e~i. If ~ these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approwd now, instead of waiting until the public can give their inputlto the new II Some Parti,'ular Examples: · On March :24~, the Planning Coaa~sio~ will b~ consk~ing approval of an ~xcepfi. o~ to the ~ Plan t? allmv · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amvad thc ~ Pla~ to allow tall builain~ and high-de?fity apartmems along Stevem Creek from De An~ Blvd. to Highway We are concerned that tl~sc dcv¢lopment~ would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and m~act neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special excepa(ons to the existing General Plan until the new one is complete~L My signature below affirms my support for this requ~s~ Name 17. h/AU C..N ri, Pl.&El'I' 1S. ..~,g[~'t:'/.. L L ,'to'-fl An Advisory Message to the City Govemment of Cupertin overy l0 y~rs. In tho past, the City officials have ~pe, atedly allowed excepuons to me t.umer~ ymu to mvor m~..ge d~velopme~s and to damage tl~ qual/ty of resid~6~! neighborhoods. Recently, exertions to the C,~m~ral Plan v'mre m~Oe in ordor to dowinntg th~ comm' of De Anza Blvd. and Stoves Creek with thc very large Cypress Hotel and VerOl,~a Apartments. Tbe current General Plan is in the process oflx~ng updated with a new Cnmeral Plan -- sclmtuled 17 be completed this smmiier. Howev~' the Cup~'fino City Council and the plannin~ Commission ~ actively considering even more ~xceptions to the gxisting General Plan before the new o~e is compl~d. If enacted, th~se ~xcgptions would p~rmit · On March 24~, the Planning Commission will be cons~dezing approval of an oxcept~on to thc G'en~al Plan Io all°w tall buila~-Es and high-density aparmmm in the area of Towa Center. : · pl~.ning Commission has asked the Council to amend th: General Plan to allow tall buildin~ and high-devilry apartm~ms along Stm~s Creek from De Anza Blvd. to H/ghway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect deasity, traffic, congestion, air quality, and inopact The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special excep~ns to the eMs~ng General Plan until the new one is complete& My slgnalure below affirms my support for this request Printed Name Simulate Address : 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 An Advisory Message to the City Govemment of Cupertin The growth and developm~nt of the city of Cupegdno arc controlled by a ~ Plan, which is updated appm.~ately developments a~d to dama~ ~ quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, excep~ons to tl~ ~m~ral Plan v~z~ ma~ in order to dominate the coraer of De A-~ Blvd. and Stcvons Creek with the v~y large Cypress Hotel and Vero~a~ Apamncnts. The current Cmncral Plan is in th~ process of being updated with a new Ge~ral Plan -- scheduled to be completed this s~mucr. However thc Cupertino City Council and the Plasming C~,u~ssion arc actively consid&jng cron more exccptiom to thc existing Genre'al Plan before thc now one is completed, ff enacted, these exceptions would pcmfit Some Particular Examples: /~ o~ 7 · On March 24~, the planning Comll~sioll will b~ considerin~ approval of an exception to the General Plan ~0 allow tail buildings and high-density apartmel:lts in the area of Town Center. · Plan~ing Commission h~e asked the Council to amend thc General Pla~ to allow tall buildin~ and high-deputy apaxtngnts along Stewns Cr~k from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We ar~ concerned that these developm~ats would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and in~~p~ neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City C-overnment not to allow any special exc~ns to the existing General Plan until the ne~ one is compl~e~L My signature below aJ~ms my support for this req~ Printed Nme Signature Address 9. 10. 11.-- 12. 13. 14. , An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertinoi · TI~ growth and develop,~a of th~ c~ of Cupertino are controlled by a Geny. ral Plaa, which ~s ulx~ated_appro, x~im~ y ~ 10 years. In tl~ past, tl~ CiW o~llcials have .r~y allowed excelm.ons ckwdopmems and to damage the q.~)i~ of reside-! neighborhoods....R~ntl, y, ex~pUons to t~ ~ l'laa v~r~ mao~ in orde~ to do~inme th~ corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevem Creek with thc very large Cypress Hotd aad V~ Apamnents. l~e current C~neral Plan is inthe process ofbeing updated with a new General Plan-- scheduledl~ be compk~axi this summer. However th~ Cupertino City Council and the Plamfing Commission are actively considel~ng even more exceptions ~o the ~ ~ Plan b~fore thc new one is complc~xi. If ~ these exceptions would pemft undesirable development to b~ approved now, instead of waiting unffl the public can " EXHiBIt ~ome Particular Examoles: ~ P7 · On March 24~, the Planning C,auu6ssiaa will b~ consi&ring approval of aa exception to thc General Plan' o allow tall butlalng, ~.a hi~-density apamne~ in the area of Town C.~ter. . · Planning Con-anissiun has ask~ tt~ Council to ameacl the Gmeml Plan to allow tall buildings and high-d~ 6ty apartmems along Stevens Cn~k fxom De A--'~ Blvd. to Highway We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect d~sity, tra~c, congestion, air qua1~ and m~pact! ndghbo~ood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City ~avernment not to allow any special excep~ exi~ng General Plan until the new one is completed My signature below affirms my support for this req~ ~ns to the Printed Name Sienature Address 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. An Advisory Message to the City Government of cuperar~.~ .. ~ 1o ~. k ~ ~ ~ ~,~_ ~~,:-~~. ~, ~ ~ ~.~_,~~ An Advis°~ Message to the City Government of Cu development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 year~. ~n t~ past, the City offc~ ~ve ~tedly allowed exceptio~ to tbe.Oenera! Pl~ to fa.~.r large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to me uencral man were maoe in order to dominate the comer of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan-- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead o give their input to the new General ~ome Particular Examples: b~ ~ '~ On March 24~, the Planning Commission will be considering approval of an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the Ci(y Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completed. My signature below affirms my support for this reques~ Printed Name Signature Address 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and developmem of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recemly, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Pla~_~ Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one:s exceptions would permit undesirable development to be completed. If enacted, these EX a~r~ye4~l~ l~llllllIH~l I waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Pla ~ome Particular Examnles: ~' ''/~0 ~ · On March 24~, the Planning Commission will be considering ~ns,~awoi an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments aiong Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is cotnpleted. My signature below affirms my support for this request. Printed Name Signature 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 25. Address An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Hah -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be applov2,d no~- i~ waiting un~l ~he public can give their input to the new General elanIll V U I D I T SomePart,cularExamoles= #~"?~'"f-O~ r_/~kllll~l I · On March 24a, the Planning Commission Will be considering ap--'~F0val of an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completed My signature below affirms my support for this requesr Printed Name Sienature Address 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 24. 25. ~u ~.>-c. ~ An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and development of thc city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly gone against the standards set in the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the corner of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apartments. The cmrent General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Commission are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Plan. EXt-!IB IS Some Particular Examples: ~ ~'7 · On March 24~, the Planning Commission will be consideri to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completed. My signature below affirms my support for this request. Printed Name nature Address 11. 12. o~ t.~ ~oti~ ¢+. 24. 25. 'I LXHIBiI' An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupedinq TI~ growth ~-a ~ of~c city of Cupertino arc com~llcd by a C,~cral Plan, which is upda~ app~ly in order to do~h~:~g thc comer of De .a,7~ Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress 1-1o~! aha verm~a Apamncm~. Thg currc~ C_gncral Plan is in fl~g process of being UlXia~l w~h a ng~v General P~m -- scheduled to bc o.~pleted this ~ler. However th~ Curerfi~ Cit~ Council a~. thc P .l,~. C~'mt~.sio~. are aefiv~..y zo~, ~jng undmirable d~velopment to be approved now, instead of w~Jfin.g~ until the public can give tl~ir in, ut ~me Particular Exmoles: ~- ,~.-'~7 , On March 24t~, th~ Planning Cc~mi~on will be cc~idering approval of an c'xc~fionto ~ ~ P~t° ~ow tall bui~ai,~ and hish~,ity apamnents in th~ area of Tow~ C~nt~r. · Pla--i-S Ce~mtission has asked ~he Council to amend the ~ PLan to allow tall buildi-~ and high-de~ apartmen~ along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Hi,way 85. We are conc~ned R~t thee d~vdopm~ts would adver~ly aff~ct d~sity, traffic, cong~on, air quality, and inFact neighborhood schools. T~e Concerted Citi~ns of C-pengo urgently c~ll for the City G~ernment not to allo~ a~y special ~ons to e~ing Gener~lPlan umll t~e ne~ o~e is compl~e~/ My signature belo~ affo~ my support for t~is re~u~. Printed Name Shmature Address 17. 18. ' 'n An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cuperti Ti~ growth and dm, c~ ofth~ c~ty of Cupexfino as~ comrollexl by a ~ Plan, which i~ u mn~'y 10 y~u.s... In tho past, th~ City officials ha!v~ r~y allowed ex~ t° th~ ~ Plas ia on~r to domi~t, th~ com~- of D~ .Aj~za Blvd. and Stev~ Creek with th~ vcxY lar~ Cypin~ sc, htxlulcd ~, Th~ curr~ ~ Plan is in tl~ proc~s ofbe~E updated with a m'w General Plan -- ~,~:.lct~i this s.?,,~c~. Howcv~ rtz Cupc~no City Coundl and thc Planning q--7-~ · On March 24~, tl~ planning G--~mi.~ion will be comide~ng apProval of an °xcepfon t° the Gen~ P~ 1 ° ~ · p~,,~,ing C~m~fission has asked the Council to an~e~_ d th~ ~ Plan to allow tall buildings and high.d~n ~ty ~ along Stevens Creek ts~m De Anza Blvd. to Hi~oh~nay 85. l~e Cone~ned ~irams of Cupes~o urgently call,or the Cio~ C~a~ernraent not to allo~ any special exe~ ms to the existing General Plan until tire new one is completed. My signature below a~rms my support for this Printed Name ~ Address An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino · On March 24~', the Pla~ai~ C..~mmi~] will b~ co~d~i~; app existing Geaeral /? An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertin(~ 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 15. An Advisory MesSage to the City Government of Cupertino The growth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately every 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the G~neral Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the comer of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be Apartments. The current General Plan is Planning Commission are actively considering even completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the new one is completed. If enacted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their input to the new General Some Particular Examples_: · On March 24~, the Planning C r er f an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density ap ' · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Government not to allow any special exceptions to the existing General Plan until the new one is completeg My signature below affirn~ my support for this request. Printed Name ~ Address' -'-' I. 14. ~17. ~ 18. An Advisory Message to the City Government of Cupertino The ~,rowth and development of the city of Cupertino are controlled by a General Plan, which is updated approximately over), 10 years. In the past, the City officials have repeatedly allowed exceptions to the General Plan to favor large developments and to damage the quality of residential neighborhoods. Recently, exceptions to the General Plan were made in order to dominate the comer of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek with the very large Cypress Hotel and Verona Apamnents. The current General Plan is in the process of being updated with a new General Plan -- scheduled to be completed this summer. However the Cupertino City Council and the Planning Cormmssion are actively considering even more exceptions to the existing General Plan before the nesv one is completed. If enaeted, these exceptions would permit undesirable development to be approved now, instead of waiting until the public can give their inPut to the new General EXHIBIT Some Particular Examples: :~ 27 · On March 244, the planning Commission will be considering approval of an exception to the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments in the area of Town Center. · Planning Commission has asked the Council to amend the General Plan to allow tall buildings and high-density apartments along Stevens Creek from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. We are concerned that these developments would adversely affect density, traffic, congestion, air quality, and impact neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens of Cupertino urgently call for the City Go~ernment not to allow any special exceptions to the e:dsting General Plan until the new one i~ completed My signature below affirms my support for this request. Printed Name Signature Address 23. 24. 25. qT'-~ 95014 Yes ...............Cherry Lum ........................ 95014 Yes Jeffrey Lure 95014 Yes Jeffrey Lum i, and residents of Cupertino Classics (Macadam Lane), submitted an issues statement opposing APN#369-01-058 at the hearing on this topic on March 24, 2003. The issues 95014 Yes dames Haferd statement was signed by 19 resident/homeowners of the Cupertino Classics PUD. I can forward a cop)' of the issues statement to any interested par~ Th~ You 95014 Yes j~y~,~ ~nCk~ ~ 95014 Yes David Chu 95014 Yes Annie Kuo ' Cupertino unique small city feel is getting lost with aI1 thse high rise buildings which will Anuradha end up being unoccupied - SV has enough empty bdgs- Cupertino city does not have to add 95014 Yes Parthasarathy to it! We want Cupertino to stay the way it is and the city officials should look at enhancing s~rts facil ties and education. Parthasarathy 95014 Yes Sundararajan I agree with the petition Cupertino's unique small city feel is geUing lost with all thse high rise buildings which will knuradha end up being unoccupied - SV has enough empty bdgs - Cupertino city does not have to add 95014 Yes ~arthasarathy to it! We want Cupertino to stay the way it is and the city officials should look at enhancing sports facilities and education es W®m-Yan Ko~ Please do not allow high density, the traffic situation in cupertino is getting worse, i agree V41CHAE1 GOTT~/ALD there should be housing, everyone should be able to get housing in cupertino, i feel sorry 95014-4930 Yes for the homeless people on the streets, fix the homeless problem Please have a booth for signatires at the flea market 6/5. I'll he happy to help. We must 95014 Yes Dave and Lorn Riopel stgp this ripoff b)' staff and cl~y~)ope~ Pi~AS~'~to~ ~e~ t~ ~evens Creek when you mean Stevens Er ... 95014 YoS Duborah Jamison Stevens Creek and it is not a roadway. Change this error in the advisory message and in all 95014 Yea Steven Part Leave the view of the mountains alone!!! 95014 yes joy ban 95014 Yes A bert Hoffrnan Yas '~ cadlon{ when is the next meeting on the general plan 9bU'1~1. Yes Charles Taubman 95014 yes Barbara Taubman 95014-2335 Thomas R0bbins The urbanization of Cupertino has to stop I have resided here since 1966. - ..... Th9mas R°bb ns The Urbanization of CUpertino has to stop I have resided here since 1966. 95014-23;5~ xes the neighbourhood of Town Center. This was an amazing place to live. Relativly quiet and convenintnly close to shopping and other services. Now I am appalled that the planning commission is looking in favorably at this monstrous plan to develop TOWN CENTER. It 95014 Yes Rachel Friedman will impact this area in a way that will change to the worst the quality of living. Isn't it enough that they JAMMED the intersection of Stevens Creek and De Anza Blvd? How crowded can this place get??~9 :::: Yes Gad e Serouss 95014 Yes Myma Ehrlich 95014 Yes Tamar Levi Received via contact@icybarvista.com: "Please include me in your petition to stop the 95014 Yes Sandy Katz Town Center 95014 Yes 95124 No Dav d V arrea Final Test 95014 Yes Young Feng I agree with the above petition. Bill Britt 22314 No Patricia Britt 95008[ No Gregg D Mahurin I did not like the way the corner of Stevens Creek and DE Anza wem'e Pushed through. I don't 95014 Yes ~USA~ ~ ~e urganfly call for the City Goveramant NOT to allow any special exceptions to the 95014 Yes existing General Plan until the new one is completed! the Planning Dept. no more exceptions to the existing General Plan. Covet our current local retailers instead of creating more competition for them.And lastly, start listening to 95014 Yes Robert Hendrickson the voices of the residents instead of just those few you "dance with" and wisper in your eat want yo~ ~[.~ I~: 95014 Yes 95014 Yes Virginia Sorich Robert M. Sorich 95014 Yes Stove Chen : yes ~:~nny Peng 95014 yes .................... Peony Peng 95014 Yes Thang Do AnnShirkey 95014 Yes Kenneth Chu 95014 yes Sung Murata Pieasc preserve the Cupertino Colrmaunity. We moved into this city 3 years ago because wc 95014 Yes ]ikad the small-town feeling. 9~01,~.~ ~ Davd Murata NO EXCEPTIONS TO EXIS3]NG GENERAL PLAN!i! ............. 95014 Yes jackie Jackson Bill Fry 95014 Rhoda Fry 95014-2832 Yes 95014 Yes ,au s evert ....... ...... 95014 Yes R!cha[d E~!dman Maybe the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group needs more housing, but "we" the people of this community do not! The surrounding towns benefit by the jobs in Cupertino, then they Susan Sievert drive home to a community [hat didn't sea out there quality of life to developers and to high 95014 No tech! Your Grade for the City Center = F minus. Shame on you for selling us down the fiver ~nd?t~p saying "you know.thi~ community.~ Yg~ do not. rA ~qgpty ~9~ta ~!~ta 95014 Yes T ng-Yun Yao ........ Nnney ~nhorr ~,,~ti~ ~ ~o ~d~c{ ~ ~ ~i 95014 Yes Nancy Scheft cupertino is too crowded as it is! 95014 Yes Joseph Reyda 95014 Yes 95014 Yes Gen · Reyda ........... 95014 Yes VinRa Reddy Yes Ghandra Reddy Yea Note that the middle school radisblcting requires early teens to cross the busy cupertino krishna ramada$ struts by bike and by foot. Speed limit reduction is neeessaty to increase pades[rian safety. 95014 Yes Heavy business density along these same busy streets i~ counter to creating a walk-to- .~hool env[ro.m~ ~y~th the new school boundaries I have tlved in Cupertino my whole life (33 years). It is sad te see such a great city turn into Rob van Blommestein a cluster of tall buildings and congestion. These oew devalopments offer nothing to 95014 Yas improve the quallty of life in Cupertino. Le-Vinh Pham 95014 Yes Kenneth Luu p}~ ~?.F~peptions to th~ ~xis!i~g general pl~ I am not in favor with the planning commission to modify an exception to the General Plan Riohard F. Abraau allowing tall buiding and High density Apartment without first presenting the information g5014 Yas to residents of the City of Cupertino 3~ff§'f~h ~5014 Yes Robert Lum Yas RObert Lum .y.~..s. Roshan A. Gidwani Yes Ga Lee ! have expresscdmy concer.s and opinion in a ~v ous message to the council and the 95014.Yes Darrel Lorn 95014 Yes EXHIBITS END HERE