20. Historic Preservation Policies
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
Fax: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO
Community Development
Department
Summary
Agenda Item No. ,;20
Agenda Date: November 5, 2007
Application: CP-2007-03 - Historic Preservation Ordinance
Applicant: City of Cupertino
Property Location: City-wide
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Provide direction to the Planning Coinmission regarding Application No. CP-2007-03,
City of Cupertino, Citywide, Historic Preservation Policies.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council should do the following:
1. Evaluate the City's existing Historic Preservation Policy.
2. Plan to update our historic inventory and develop a preservation strategy for
each site as part of the Planning Commission 2008/09 work program. Staff will
prepare an implementation schedule and budget program to support this effort
for your consideration at the time of development and adoption of the work
program.
BACKGROUND
On January 8,2007, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Historic Preservation
Policy as part of the work program for 2007/8. The Council was interested in a more
proactive approach to preserve existing buildings working with the Historical Society
and other community groups.
In 1996, the City Council appointed a five-member ad-hoc Historic Research Committee
to identify potential historic sites. The primary purpose of that research effort was to
evaluate the historic values of tlle sites and recommend which of the sites potentially
warrant preservation and eventually adopt a historic preservation ordinance. The final
report from the Historic Research Committee identified, researched the history and
rated 32 potentially historic sites. Their report is attached as Exhibit E. The City
Council on October 6, 1997 accepted the report and the conclusions from the Historic
Research Committee and determined that a historic preservation ordinance was not
warranted, primarily because the highest valued sites listed in the report already have
protective measures in place.
20 - 1
Historic Preservation Ordinance
Page 2
~ovember5,2007
Existing General Plan Policy
The Cupertino General Plan, under the Historic and Cultural Resources Section, Goal
"G" provides the framework for the protection of historically and archaeologically
significant structures and sites, including heritage trees.
Goal G
Protection of Historically and Archaeologically significant structures, sites and artifacts.
Policy 2-62
"Undertake an active partnership with private owners of landmark structures to rehabilitate the
buildings for public or semi-private occupancy in order to retain their historic character."
TIUs policy is intended for the preservation and protection of heritage sites and
landmarks that have already been deemed by the City as having significant historic
values. The General Plan lists 28 such sites (19 heritages sites and 9 landmarks - see
Exhibit B) and most of the sites are public or quasi-public uses. Technically there are no
approval or review requirements for site and building changes for properties on the
General Plan's historic resources list. However, the City has been successful in
preserving or commemorating historic buildings and sites in several different ways:
Whole structure or site is presel'Ved
Examples of structures that have been preserved are the Miller house on Phil Place (see
29 of the Historical Report) and the Nathan Hall Tank House near the Blackberry Farm
Golf Course. The former was retained as part of a planned development, and the latter
was preserved through an agreement 'with the homeovvners of the planned
development on which it was located to dedicate land to -allow the City to restore the
structure. That agreement did not work effectively and the city is now coordinating a
community effort with the Rotary Club to restore the structure. Another example is the
replica Baer Blacksmith Shop built by Charley Baer after his father's death. The
structure 'was moved to McClellan Ranch Park and is now owned and preserved by the
City of Cupertino (see page 13 of the Historic Report)
Stl'Uctul'e 01' site is C011tl1tel1wrated
In many cases the structure has been destroyed or is such poor condition it CaIU10t be
reasonably restored. Such structures or sites can be commemorated with plaques such
as the Woeffel CaImery site at the Astoria Development on Imperial Avenue. See
photos on the following page of this report. Other examples include the Cali Mill Plaza
at the corner of Stevens Creek aIld De Anza Boulevard and the site of Elisha Steven's
Home (destroyed by the 1906 earthquake) at the Blackberry Farm (see page 16 of the
Historic Report). The potential exists for other sites to be identified over time such as
commemorating the history of development of the personal computer with a plaque on
the buildings first occupied by Apple Computer on Bubb Road.
20 - 2
Historic Preservation Ordinance
Page 3
November 5, 2007
~..
~.
-;'~<-'~.:.----:: ... -,-,.~~ ~ ..- ~ .
iV ~_ .~
~t - ~~::~,.;~-"- ., _:i..,".~::4J,"":~iiZ.,'~~;~"'
- 'fil ---..... - --
..
~Q
~
Portions of a structure a1'e preserved
Sometimes only portions of a structure can be preserved. One example is the
"gingerbread" from the Enoch Parrish residence that was incorporated into the gazebo
at Cupertino Memorial Park. Another example is the recent approval of the Lawrence
Guy residential project on Stelling Road, 'ivhich requires that the applicant use elements
from the existing Tracy House to construct a trellis or gazebo at the common plaza area,
(See page 24 of the Historical Report for a photo of the home,)
..- ,g,
i!f~~ ;1'0..;.;~ -.~> -cfs. '9711."-' ../., . ill
:'!'P;--\T'""')!:: Q '1.4l'!:~ ~.. ,r'lllo-
~....)
~
:.~
20 - 3
Historic Preservation Ordinance
Page 4
~oven1ber5,2007
Policy 2-65
"Protect and maintain heritage tJ'ees in a healthy state."
The City has a list of heritage trees that have historic value and warrant preservation
and protection. An example of tl1is would be the palm trees on Palm Avenue. Please
see exhibit E for a list of the City's heritage trees.
DISCUSSION
In spite of the lack of a definitive ordinance tl1e city has pursued preservation or
commemoration of historic buildings and sites in conjunction with developn1ent
applications or independently as sites have become available. It is appropriate to
periodically update the historic inventory and to explore strategies to better preserve
Cupertirio's history.
Staff believes this can be accomplished with an update of the historical inventory and
identification of the preferred means of preservation prior to the structure or site being
considered for some other use. Presumably this will entail working individuals in the
community and commmuty groups such as the Cupertino HiStoric Society to update
the 1997 list prepared by the Historic Research Committee and identify the preferred
means of preservation. This effort 'will entail the following:
. Determining which properties/ sites should be included.
. Discuss the designation with the affected property oVvners.
. Retain some architectural and structural expertise to evaluate the economic and
structural feasibility of preserving and restoring a historic property. Some
budget amount will need to be identified for this effort along with a schedule for
completion of the updated list and preservation strategy.
Following this effort the Council can determine if the program can continue to be
effectively implemented on a voluntary basis working with individual property owners
and developers or if a more prescriptive ordinance is necessary.
Prepared by: Gary Chao, Senior Planner
Approved by:
Steve Piasec
Director, Community Development
David W. Knapp
City Manager
20 - 4
Historic Preservation Ordinance
Page 5
November 5, 2007
ENCLOSURES
Exhibit A: Minutes from the City Council, October 20,1997.
Exhibit B: General Plan Goal "G", Historic and Cultural Resources Section.
Exhibit C: City Council Minutes on the Council's Work Program, January 8, 2007
Exhibit D: City of Cupertino Heritage Tree List, 1999.
Exhibit E: Historic Report by the Historic Research Committee, 1997.
20 - 5
October 20, 1997 Cupertino City Council Page 5
~
threshold. He felt this project was an overall improvement to the are regretted that
the neighbors who objected to it had no mitigation measure uggest other than to deny
the project.
Sorensen moved to gran~the appeal ild 0 approve application 1O-EXE~97, 'with the
modification of condition No 0 add a sentence that the existing trees on the site shall
be protected in accord e with the city's tree preservation ordinance. Burnett seconded,
, ~
and the motion ed 5-0.
PL
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
14. Report of the Historical Research Committee.
Community Development Director Cowan explained the foonation of the ad hoc
historical research committee.
:Mr. Jerry Stevens, Chairman Pro Tern of the committee, introduced the other commi~ee
members. Those included David Smith, Hugh Riddell, Bob Keyes, and Denise Han who
was not present. He commended the effort of all of the committee members including
input from Mr. Bob Levy. He said that they limited themselves to reviewing the 33 sites
which had originally been provided to them and tried to come up with an objective
documented description of those sites in view of protection that is needed. He said they
viewed the videotape entitled "A Place Called Cupertino", and it highlighted how the
community had changed from a rural, open area to a very dense community which affects
all the historiCal properties which the City has. Mr. Stevens discussed each member's
area of expertise and how the sites were ranked. These categories included architectural,
historical, and envirOlIDlental. The CUlTent protection status was reviewed at the very end
of the process. Sites were also noted for any unique properties that they possessed. TIle
final recommendation from tlle committee/was unanimous. Mr. Stevens also commanded
Deborah Ungo-McCormick for her fine work as their recording secretary.
The Councilmembers all expressed their appreciation for the hard work of this committee
and the high quality called the report which they produced. Burnett conID1ented that this
year be Silicon Valley bicycle coalition cycle rally will be held in Cupertino. It will be a
treasure hunt and tlle historic homes are the items for which they will be searching.
:Mr. George Monk, 19985 Price Avenue, said the direction to this committee had been to
define structures of compelling interest. Council member Chang suggested those would
be the types of buildings you would take schoolchildren on a field trip to visit. This
report has shown that there are very few such places. He also pointed out that very few of
the homes have scores of less than 20. That's because in order to get on this list, they
have to be quite old. If that measurement were deleted very few of these homes would
get halfway up the scale. Mr. Monk agreed tlmt tlle report is au excellent piece of work
and supported the committee's conclusion that can historical ordinance was not necessary.
20 - 6
October 20, 1997
Cupertino City Council
Page 6
Ms. Mary Lou Lyon said she did not volunteer to be on the committee because she was
gone most of the summer. She felt the committee had done an excellent job. She would
find, as an historian, that the first seven or eight on the list were compelling and certainly
would take children to visit them.
The CounciImembers all expressed their appreciation for the hard work of tins committee
and the high quality of the report which they produced. Sorensen said her only concern
was regarding the Hammond-Haines house on page 14-27 on which no assessment was
made. This is located on the diocese property and she felt tIlat further study may be
necessary. Chang suggested that this outstanding report from the Historical Research
Committee be made available at the Cupertino library and on tile City's Website.
Burnett moved to accept the report from the Historical Research Committee. It was
determined that; based on the conclusions of tile report, a lnstoric preservation ordinance
is not warranted because the highest ranked sites are already protected. Dean seconded,
and tile motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Bautista reordered the agenda to take item No. 15 last.
NEW BUSINESS
16,
./
.E
./'
R~port o~ resi~natiollS from .coml11issi~ns: Marlene Elwell (Fine Arts~mn1ission) and
DIck Blame (BIcycle PedestrIan Comnuttee). /
The City Clerk explained that these two positions would be fjJ:~ing the annual
recruitment process in January. /
/
//
/'.
/' ,
Second reading and enactment of Orainance No. 1768: "An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City Of Cupertino ~ending Title 19 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
By Rezoning Approximately ~-lcres from RI-I0 and Rl-7.5 to Rl-10i and RI-7.5i
Zones By Adding the (i) Des(gnation 'Which Imposes a Building Height Restriction of
One Story Not To Exceyc(18 Feet Upon All New Construction Within the Zoning
Boundary; Property C~&'ists of a Portion of the Felton Park No. 3 and 4 Subdivisions,
Tract Numbers 717",-and 834 and Parcels 359-18-52, 359-18-53 and 359-18-54, Jolm
Way." /
,/
The City Clock'read the title of the ordinance. Sorensen moved and Burnett seconded to
read the orainance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the
secon~ading thereof. Motion carried 3-2, with Dean and Chang voting no.
~en moved and Burnett seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1768. Motion c";"ied 3-2,
with Dean and Chang voting no.
Council concurred to receive the report.
ORDINANCES
17.
20 -7
HISTORIC AND
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Historic Resources
Before European settlement,
Native Americans resided in the
area that is now Cupertino. The
Ohlone Indians had lived in
the Rancho San Antonio
area for over 3,000 years.
The area was first explored
by Spanish soldiers when an
expedition led by Colonel
Juan Bautista de Anza passed
through in March of 1776, and
later was settled by numerous European
immigrants who recognized the potential of
the fertile land. They established farms and
soon enjoyed a thriving agricultural economy.
HISTORlC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
name was applied to the Crossroads and to
the post office when the Home Union Store
incorporated under the name, The
Cupertino Store, and moved to the north-
east comer of the Crossroads.
We
set out ;{ram Arroyo
de las Llagas at quarter
to eight in the morning, and
at fouT in the afternoon haLted
at the arroyo of San Joseph
Cupertino...AI.ong the way many
Indians came out to us....
[FONT's CoMPLETE DIARY OF
THE SECOND ANZ....
ExPEDITION,l1ARCH
1776]
The village of Cupertino sprang up at
the crossroads of Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
(now De Anza Boulevard) and Stevens
Creek Road. It was first known as West Side
,
but by 1898, the post office at the Crossroads
needed a new name to distinguish it from
other similarly named towns. John T. Doyle,
a San Francisco lawyer and historian, had
given the name Cupertino to his winery, in
recognition of the name bestowed on the
nearby creek by Petms Font. In 1904, the
,~
. ';:
~'j
-. ...
i
~~.~
~ i:~,
~.,.e-7'~
:~
Elisha Stevens, Cupertino's first settler
Many of Cupertino's pioneer
settlers planted grapes in the
late 1800s. Vineyards and
wineries proliferated on
Montebello Ridge, on the
lower foothills, and on the
flat lands below.
As these orchards flour-
ished the valley became known for
a profusion of blossoms in spring.
Many more people passed through the
Cupertino area first by electric railway and
later by car to view all the blossoms in the
"Valley of Heart's Delight." Because of the
electric railway, the Monta Vista area of
Cupertino developed. Monta Vista was the
name of its first housing tract.
In the late 1940's, Cupertino was swept
up in Santa Clara Valley's postwar population
e>..'Plosion. Con-cemed by unplanned devel-
opment, higher taxes and piecemeal armexa-
tion to adjacent cities, Cupertino's communi-
ty leaders began a drive in 1954 for ll1.COrpO-
ration. Incorporation was approved in a
September 27, 1955 election. Cupertino offi-
cially became Santa Clara County's 13th City
on October 10, 1955. Today, Cupertino is
part of a world-renowned high technology
center, known as "Si1icon Valley," and is
home to several companies producing leading
edge computers and software,
Historic properties show Cupertino's
past. These sites remind residents of the col.
orful people who built and occupied them.
Most of the historically significant properties
al.e privately owned. Private owners and City
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
2-41
,~~jC~
~ ;f"!.'~_".
-lLi \ \_-.
i ~-.(.
~.
:-;.:.~.}:'~
. -~-",~.--
20-8----.. .
2A2
LAND USEjCOlV.MUh'ITY DESIGN
~
~y(\ '\.-
lL L~ ~.tf'.J
-~
government can work together to maintain
the historic value of these properties. A suc-
. cessful example of ~is cooperation is the
rehabilitation of the De La Vega stable in the
Rancho Deep Cliff residential subdivision.
The "Tack House" was refurbished exten-
sively inside but its exterior remains much
the same. It is the 61-home community's
recreation center and meeting hall.
~;j:Z.\
_t ..~ <-
\t.7-)2<';~~;
P'ROTECTPOI\1 OF HISTOR~CALLY Af\!D ARCHA.Eo-
LOGICALLY SbGNIFICANT STRIJCTURES, StTES
AND ARTDFACTS
~ Policy 2-52: Landmark Rehabilitation
Undertake an active partnership with
private OVi"D.ers of landmark structures
to rehabilitate the buildings for .public
or semi-private occupancy in. order to
retain their historic character.
Strategy
Flexible Standards. Allow flexible
interpretation of zoning ordinance and
building code standards not essential to
public health and safety, These could
indude reduced on-site parking provi-
sions or lesser setback distances.
~ Policy 2-53: Archaeologically
Sensitive Areas
Protect archaeologically sensitive
areas.
Strategy
Development Investigation. Require
an investigation for development pro-
posed in areas likely to be archaeologi-
cally sensitive,. such as along stream
courses and in oak groves, to determine
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PL~
Cupertino De Ora Club
if significant archaeological resources
may be affected by the project. Also
require appropriate mitigation measures
in the proj ect design.
-.. Policy 2-54: Native American Burials
Protect Native Americ811. burial sites.
Strategy
Upon discovery of such burials during
construction, take action prescribed by
State law, including stoppage of vi'Ork in
sUlTounding area, notification of appro-
priate authorities and reburial of
remains in an appropriate manner.
~ Policy 2-55: Heritage Trees
Protect 8l1.d maintain helitage trees in
a healthy state.
Strategy
Heritage Tree List. Establish and peri-
20 - 9
HISTORIC ^-"'-'""D CULTlJJt.U RESOURCES
2,43
i
,
}....
-'-
-/-"
....i
--'-
.!.1Y2Miie
, West.
.e!
i........
./'
"~~
- COMMUNITY LANDMARKS 1
I .
I &I Hanson Permanente ;
II' III Downtown Monta Vista I
I ~ Cupertino Historical Museum I
EI Memorial Park, !
Community Center, I
SporeS Complex
I
I
I I
II
I i
I :
II '
t!
I:i
~
De Anza College
De Anza Indus1;rial Park
Cupertino Ovic Center
Jim
I2lL
Valleo Fashion Park
[I
Valleo Industrial Park
Historic Resources
HDMEmA!> RDAD
l~1 I......y "="""=";,-- 1/ ""i. -~-,
. "'t,,"!~
I
.I
~
Ij'-
, SID'" Clam
.'-'-
,......~,
'<--.--1_
.'l~')~.-
1.-, ,
San}a.s.
('
-:- LEGEND
[1-:
I
. / 'I.
~ -..--
I
i
I 05
1 0 'ODD 2DDD !ODD Feet
i
'MJle
II
I
G--..') I
~. i
I
!
City Boundary
Urban Service Area Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Boundary Agreement Line
Unincorporated Areas
500
10DDMI!tefi
HISTORIC SITES
.. Perrone Ranch Stone Cellar, e
now part of Ridge Vineyards e
e Montebello School, 1892 e
e Picchetti Brothers Winery and Ranch e
8 Mar)'knoll Seminary e
" De La Veaga Tack House tD
9 Enoch J. Parrish Tank House 8
.. Replica Baer Blacksmith Shop ~
e Doyle Winery Site (foundation only) ~
~ Louis Stocklmeir Home
. Site of Elisha p, Stephens home, 1850,
now part of Blackberry Farm
Nathan Hall Tank House
Gazebo gingerbread trim, Memorial Park
Le Petit Trianon
Union Church of Cupertino
Cupertino De Orc Club
SUoseph's Church
Snyder-Hammond House
De Ar]za Knoll monument
Woelffel Cannery (former site)
CrTY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
:f,'~~'."'::'''..
"".' ~..
IT-" -.....;:'
! '/( \ '
.." / \.-
{ i .. .;'
~-- .
~.~
"'".....'_...
20 - 1 O. ..::..."c':".."
Figure Z-G. Cupertino's Historic Resources
2~44
LAND USEjCOMMUN"1TY DESIGN
r.~--
:i:\S'~~.--r-
,; /"\. '\ .
. .... 1.
(I ~..;'
~-
'_""~';J;,~~"'F)
odically revise a heritage tree list that
includes trees of importance to the
community.
Cultural Resources
Public art enhances Cupertino's image
by giving it character and identity,. and mak~
ing it attractive to residents and yisitors
alike. It enhances a business's image by pro-
viding good public relations and good will
within the community. The City intends to
make public art a reality by promoting it in
public and private development and by
incorporating art works into future revitaliza-
tion plans where possible.
A crVJC ENVIRONMENT WHlERE THlE ARTS
EXPRESS AN iN'~OVAT!\fE SPIRIT, CELEI3RATE A
RbCH ClJILTURAl DfVERSrTY AND INSPIRE iNDI-
VIDUAL AND COMMUNfTY PARTICIPATION
~ Policy 2-06: Public Arts
Stimulate opportunities for the arts
through cooperative relations between
local business and the City.
Strategies:
1. Ordinance. Develop and adopt a One-
Percent for Art ordinance, which
requires public and priyate develop-
ment to set aside .25% of their total
project budget for on-site art, with a
$100,000 cap. Apply to projects 50,000
square reet and larger.
2. Promote Art. Promote visible artworks
in public and private development 811.d
gateways to the City.
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
3. Public Art Guidelines. Follow Public
Art guidelines to assure that the pro-
posed public art is appropriately scaled
and fits into the context or its sur-
roundings.
4 Artist Vv orkspace. Encourage the
development of artist workspace, such
as live/work units.
OPEN SPACE, PARKS
AND TRAILS
Cupertino's open space policies and
programs have guided the development of
regional, community and neighborhood
parks, playing fields 811.d trails that are treas-
ured resources to its residents. Residents and
workers have numerous nearby choices ror
enjoying nature, hiking, golfing, playing ten-
nis or soccer, working out or just playing.
These activities build community by bring-
ing people together in common gathering
places and tying neighborhoods together
through connecting trails.
Regional Resources
Several public agencies share the task
of acquiring, maintaining, accessing and
developing open space lands for the enjoy-
ment of residents or Cupertino and its neigh-
boring cities. Some of these public open
spac~ lands provide high or low-intensity
recreation; some emphasize scenic beauty;
others preserve vegetation or wildlife habi-
tats; still others help control urban sprawl.
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT
TI1.e Midpeninsula Regional Open
Space District, created in 1972 by the
County electorate, states that its mission is
20 - 11
APPROVED MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Adjourned Meeting
:Monday, January 8, 2007
CITY OF
CUPEIQ'INO
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 2:00 p.m. Mayor Kris Wang called the meeting to order in the Council Chamber, 10350 Torre
Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Kris Wang, Vice-Mayor Patrick Kwok, and Council members Richard
Lowenthal, Orrin Mahoney, and Dolly Sandoval. Absent: none.
ORAL COMl\1UNICATIONS - None.
GOAL SETTING\VORK SESSION
1. Staff presentation: Organization and Work Program.
A. Budget and Economic Horizon - Acting City Manager Carol Atwood said that the
city's fiscal -outlook is currently balanced, in part because of income from the
better-than-expected sales tax from Apple Computer, Inc., and also because of
recent legislative changes regarding tax equity allocations, which will bring in
$1.35 million more in property taxes each year. She said staff will make a
presentation in May about ways the Council can consider paying for other costs
expected later in the year.
Atwood discussed the financial impacts of the recent referenda against two
condominium developments. Those impacts included the loss of $930,000 in
park dedication fees from Valleo, which were slated for the Stevens Creek
Corridor, and the loss of a 3.5-acre park in the Toll Brothers' project and an
additional $30,000 per year in retail sales tax.
B. Development Activity - Community Development Director Steve Piasecki
highlighted current development activity, including the following:
· 125 residential units on Tantau Avenue
· 115 apartments and open space added to Villa Serra apartments
· 25 residential units on Stelling Road.
· 10,000 sq. ft. of retail buildings added to the comer by Target
· 8,000 sq, ft. of retail building on the northeast corner of Tantau and Stevens
Creek Boulevard (in lieu of providing cafeteria space for their employees)
20 - 12
January 8, 2007
Cupertino City Council
Page 2
· Valleo has continuing projects
· Expansion of the retail uses at the Oaks Shopping Center, and possibly the
addition of a hotel.
C. Major Capital Improvement Project (ClP) projects - Public Works Director Ralph
Qualls said that there is a $17.3 million ClP budget spreading over 7 years, and
the two largest are the Stevens Creek Corridor and the Mary Avenue Pedestrian
Bridge.
D. Reorganization Efforts - Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith said that
her department was down from five supervisors to four, and there are four
coordinator vacancies. She would be proposing the creation of a management
position between the director and the supervisors, which would serve as a training
opportunity for her possible replacement when she retires in 17 months.
Community Development Director Steve Piasecki said that the city had been
unsuccessful in filling the new position of RedevelopmentJEconomic
Development Manager, mostly because the city's retirement system is no longer
competitive with other cities in the county. Piasecki reviewed the plans for the
new employee, who will work closely with the planning staff as well as the
development community. He handed out a proposed organizational chart, and said
the city would recruit for the position again in March.
E. Employee Morale
Carol Atwood reported that employee morale is very good. The city has been
working diligently to provide supervisor training and performance measures, and
salary negotiations will begin soon.
2. Public comments.
Jennifer Griffin, Cupertino resident, asked that the city purchase property on Sterling and
Barnhardt to create a park for the R~cho neighborhood. She also complained about the
density at a Santa Clara project called Rivermark, and asked that the Council not allow
such density in Cupertino. She also encouraged preservation of the trees and limiting
development in the north Valleo area.
3. Council Work Program for 2007 and beyond.
Council members reviewed the document titled 2006 Work Program, revised on January
4,2007, and gave the following direction to staff.
Maior DevelopmentsNallco
· Add an item to the first City Council agenda of each month called Val1co Update, at
which time the Valleo representatives will be encouraged to give an update to the
community.
20 - 13
January 8,2007
Cupertino City Council
Page 3
· See if there was a way to require the developer to provide buildings that match
architectural renderings shown to Council.
· Recommend some ways that the city may be able to provide more aggressive help for this
project
· Provide status reports regarding development agreement approvals.
Maior DevelopmentsfToll Brothers
· Change this item"s title to read HP site (Stevens Creek Boulevard) with a notation that the
zoning approval was denied by referendum only for residential uses, and the developer
can still propose retail and/or office uses.
Maior Developments/McDonaldIDorsa Quarry site
· This category was deleted
Capital Improvements and PlanslParks
· Add a goal that the City will enhance its outreach efforts regarding environmental
improvements and tree replacement.
Capital Improvements and PlanslRancho Rinconada Park
· Modify the goal to say that work shall commence on the Lawrence Expressway Linear
Park, with a note that the city should leverage future annexations and 'lEA (Tax Equity
Allocation) / ERAF (Education Relief Augmentation Fund) inequity in negotiations.
Council members Sandoval and Lowenthal will serve on the subcommittee.
Capital Improvements and Plans/Quinlan Community Center Fountain
· Add this goal, and direct staff to propose a project to replace the broken fountain.
Options should include an active space, which may include a water feature, seating, stage,
or other components.
Or!!anizational Improvements/Fiscal Strate!!ic Plan
· Pursue correction of ERAF (Education Relief Augmentation Fund) percentage for TEA
(Tax Equity Allocation) funding.
· Schedule a public hearing to adopt safes as a standard conditions on residential
development
· Prepare ballot issues for an amended business license fee (to add quarries) and a Users'
Utility Tax ordinance for the November 2007 election
· Analyze a possible entertainment tax and bring back to Council for review
Or!!anizational Improvements/Community Development Services Review
· Delete this category and add new sections under Planning.
Public Safety/Law Enforcement
· Distribute neighborhood watch maps on a quarterly basis
20 - 14
January 8, 2007
Cupertino City Council
Page 4
Public SafetvfTraffic Safety
· Require pedestrian access between Whole Foods Market, Peet's Coffee and Panera
Breads.
· Review the current status of technology for a Red Light Running Prevention program
· Delete reference to HP condominiums
Economic Development/Redevelopment
· Propose options to assist Vallco
· Promote the AMC Theaters grand opening
Planning
Add the following categories:
· Green building standards
· Prepare a Historic Preservation policy
· Propose a policy for tree topping as a part of the property maintenance standards
ClPIParksIRancho Rinconada Park
· Provide a timeline for the completion of this project .
· This year's plan should include tlle resolution of the trail alignment along the Stocklmeir
property.
· Consider amending property maintenance standards for trees not included in the tree
ordinance
CLOSED SESSION
4. Labor negotiations - Government Code Section 54957.6 regarding the evaluation of the
City Manager.
At 5:40 p.m. the Council went into a closed session for the City Manager's evaluation,
and reconvened at 7:00 p.m. No action was taken, and the item was continued to January
16 at 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:00 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to January 16,5:30 p.m.
Kimberly Smith, City Clerk
20 - 15
January 8, 2007
Cupertino City Council
Page 5
For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at
www.cupertino.on!.Click on Agendas & Minutes/ City Council! Packets.
Most Council meetings are shown live on Cable Channel 26, and are available at your
convenience from our web site. Visit W'iJ,7'w.cupertino.org and click on View Meetings Online.
Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City
Channel,777-2364.
20 - 16
Heritage T red Location Map
Homest ad Road
'..... - --- -'---..-- =@--
"<"-~'--=":~-:-::':s>:::-::::,,?-,,:::";:::--=--- ---- ----. - ~ :::::::":.:::: ':-'..>... '-g
C ',' 0
Q) "~
> u.:: '<-.
<( (]) -"~:-.-
Lt- "" -
-0 '.-::.......
..~.
::> 6.'
> i? "':::'"
~
~q;
:1Ji
Q)
C
co
co
r
ill
~
...,
CD
:J
(')
;' CD
m
,x
;-0
...,
CD
,C/)
'C/)
,~
ill
'<
J
Drive
N
A
I\,)
o
,
~
---J
.f. Heritage Trees
L\/ City Boundaries
Koadways '
. 1\1 Arterial
Prospect Road 1\/ Collector
Expressway
Freeway
/\/ Creeks and Streams
CITV-OF
CUPEI\TINO
r-~
g:/planning/m3ps/HeritageTree
City Of Cupertino
Heritage Tree List
(In conformance with Ordinance No. 1573, Section 4)
CITY OF
CUPEIQ"INO
2
Kolter Pine
20900 McClellan Road
Tree planted Mabel William Noonan's Grandfather, Samuel
Williams in 1888. Mabel was a teacherin the Cupertino Union
School District for 17 years, well loved and known for her
enthusiastic romotion of Cu ertino and its histo
Planted between 1900 and 1909 by Karla Friedrich. He was the
Historian of Cupertino until 1950. He was.a resident of Cupertino
and a native of San Francisco, born in 1869.
Considered magnificent specimens to be preserved. '
Probably one of the largest trunk diameters seen on these species.
Planted by Samuel Williams.
Planted by John T. Doyle to line the main. entrance to the Las
Palmas Winery. Doyle was a prominent attorney, author, historian
and vintner.
1
Pepper Tree
3 Coast Live Oak 21971 McClellan Road
4 Coast Live Oak 21971 McClellan Road
5 Almond Tree 10026 Orange Avenue
6-38 California Fan Palm A venue right-of-way
Palms from South Foothill Blvd.
To Scenic Blvd.
For additional information about these heritage trees, contact the Cupertino Historical Society or refer to City of Cupertino file
81,004.154.
12199
G :/plann ing/mise/Heritage Trees. doc
'"
o
,
......
00
~
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: Robert Cowan, Director of Community Development
Date: October 6, 1997
Subj: Historic Research Committee Report
Backe:round
On May 5, 1997, the City Council appointed 5 Cupertino residents to the Historic Research
Committee, a working ad-hoc committee charged with researching 32 potential historic sites
listed in Exhibit B of the Historic Building Demolition Ordinance. The committee included a
retired architect (experienced in renovation of historic structures), a historian, a photographer,
a school administrator/amateur photographer and a semi-retired lecturer (electronics). The
primary purpose of this research effort was to evaluate the historic values of the sites and
recommend which of the sites may be compelling cases for preservation. With this
information, the City Council can determine if there is a need for a Historic Preservation
Ordinance.
Methodoloe:v:
The Historic Research Committee held regular weekly meetings at City Hall through the
summer. The purpose of the meetings was to clarify roles and responsibilities, develop a
strategy and work program, assign tasks and report on progress of research and evaluation
efforts. Notice of the formation of the Committee and its first meeting on June 12, 1997 was
mailed to property owners of listed sites, the Cupertino Historical Society and other interested
parties. These meetings were open to the general public whereby interested parties were able to
stay informed on the status of the research effort, and input was welcome to assist the
committee in gaining a greater knowledge about listed sites. Once work assignments were
given out, committee members worked individually or as teams in the collecting of
information, visiting sites for a photographic survey and evaluation of sites.
The Cupertirio Historic Society provided the City and Committee copies of site profiles for
recommended historic sites, including the 32 listed in the Appendix. In addition, Mr. Robert
Levy, local geographical historian and published author, volunteered to assist the committee
with gathering of information and sharing of knowledge about the geographical history of
Cupertino and the Santa Clara Valley. One of the first actions the Committee took was to
agree to limit their review of sites to those listed in Exhibit B (32 sites ). This was not only
based on a specific directive given by the City Council during interviews for appointment to
the Committee, but also on the major task at hand and the tight anticipated timeline.
To assist in the evaluation of sites, the Committee voted to utilize the Historic Ranking of Sites
Criteria provided by City staff vvith the praposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. In addition,
Appendix A- Historical Merit was utilized as a secondary ranking criterion. The Committee
then conducted research utilizing local sources which included primary and secondary sources
of information. Primary Sources are historical records that have not been interpreted, while
Secondary Sources are interpretations made by historians based on Primary Sources. Based on
the information obtained through available sources, the Committee concluded that, in general,
interviews with current owners of properties were not necessary or would not add to the
information already available through research. Therefore, interviews with property owners
were not conducted.
Once the information gathering phase was complete, the committee began the process of
evaluating sites as individual members and as a group. All sites were evaluated on
architectural, historical and environmental merit. Each member completed an individual site
ranking for each category and an average of individual rankings was utilized to develop the
overall ranking system. A summary of group rankings is included in the attached report.
Historic Research Committee ConclusionslRecommendations:
Conclusions: The Committee concluded from this effort that two sites may be compelling cases
for preservation and four additional 3itCS were considered less compelling, but of considerable
merit. Beyond that, a limited number of structures/sites have some merit but do not meet the
"compelling" criterion as the concept was understood by the committee. Of those found to be
compelling cases or of considerable merit (but less compelling), four sites are already covered by
some preservation mechanism. Downtown Monta Vista could not be defined; therefore an
architectural evaluation could not be drawn.
Throughout the process, committee members focused on the review of the 32 sites and structures
keeping in mind what they were charged with the evaluation on only those sites. However, they
questioned how some sites ended up on the list while others of potentially greater merit did not.
For example, while the wine cellar's foundation at the Pichetti winery included a partial
foundation only (which was very difficult to access), the building which was built circa 1910
appears to be in very good condition and yet is not listed. Similar questions arose about other
sites throughout the city during the photographic and research portion of the effort.
Historic Research Committee Recommendations:
1. That many of these sites were recommended because of a desire to honor a person who may
have lived in or had a connection with them. Perhaps a more meaningful and informative
method or approach may be to have a suitabie memorial in a public park where a history
would be available for public recognition.
2. That new sites as they might be recommended should have justification provided by the
requesting person, group or organization before acceptance. Appendix A - Historic Ranking
System would be a good model. Its use would provide a merit comparison with their
findings.
3. That a number of properties offer significant interest and could well be included in an
historical brochure as included in the overall ranking page of the report. This would not
require any code or preservation action.
2
Staff comments:
The committee found it difficult to define the word "compelling" and thus agreed to use the
overall ranking method as their way to determine if a site would fit such a definition. The
overall ranking recommendations submitted by the Committee were based on an averaging of
assigned points in each category. It was assumed then that only those sites which ranked
highest overall would qualify as potential compelling sites. Therefore, where a site might rank
very high in the historic category, its overall ranking may be very low because of its low
ranking in the environmental and/or environmental category and thus not qualify as
compelling. For example, the highest ranked historical site, Stocklmeir, holds an overall
ranking of 21 s" due to low rankings in the two other categories. Should this be of concern to
the Council, Action 2 below could be considered.
The staff commends the work performed by the Historic Research Committee in its review of
the list of sites included in Exhibit B to determine if those listed should remain on a list of
protected structures. This does not mean that there are no other sites in Cupertino which, if
evaluated under the same process, might qualify as compelling for preservation. The Council
could take Action Option 2 if it is felt that additional sites should be researched.
Action:
1. Accept the report and take no action. Determine that, based on the conclusions of the
Research Committee Report, a historic preservation ordinance is not warranted because
the highest ranked sites already are protected.
or
2. Accept the Report and direct staff to set a date for public hearing and bring forth a
recommendation for a mechanism/ordinance for preservation, either based on
remainder of the list found not compelling and/or other sites/structures not currently
listed. The Council could consider revising the ranking system to acknowledge high
rankings in each category vs. the overall ranking.
Enclosures: '_
Historic Research Committee Report dated September 17, 1997
Submitted by:
Approved by:
Robert Cowan
Community Development Director
Don Brown
City Manager
g:/planninglcchistoric
3
CUPERTINO HISTORICAL RESEARCH COMMITTEE
REPORT
SEPTEMBER 17,1997
Committee llfembers:
Bob Keys
Denise Pan
Hugh Riddell
David Smith
Jerry Stevens
Staff Members:
Deborah Ungo-McCormick, Planning Consultant
Robert Cowan, Director of Community Development
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
SECTIONS
PAGES
Report from Historical Research Committee
Overall ranking of sites/ structures
Location of sites
Profiles of sites
End notes
Bibliography
APPENDICES
. Protected Potential Historic Structures as listed in General Plan
(Exhibit 2-F)
. Historic Ranking System
. Appendix A - Historical Merit
. Minutes Qf Historic Research Committee Meetings
1
3
4
6
38
44
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE REpORT
On May 5 1997, an ad hoc committee was appointed by the City of Cupertino to perform the task
of assessing the historical worth of certain structures/sites. A list of these, Appendix B,
Protected Potential Historic Structures, was provided and contained a total of 32 structures/sites.
The committee consisted of the following persons:
1. Bob Keys
2. Denise Pan
3. Hugh Riddell
4. David Smith
5. Jerry Stevens
At its first meeting, June 12, 1997, the committee elected Jerry Stevens as chairman pro-tem.
Early in the committee's deliberations, Mr. Bob Levy, a noted local author and historian, made
his knowledge of the 'West Sides' growth available and provided important historical data and
information. Also noted is the considerable assistance to the committee provided by 'city staff'
personnel Deborah Ungo-McCormick and by Bob Cowan, Director of Community Development.
A list of specific objectives was provided as direction to the committee. The objectives are as
follows:
1. Research the historic value of sites and buildings listed in the General Plan historic
resource and Cupertino Historical society lists.
2. Prove that structures/sites left on the list are compelling cases for preservation and
the demolition or change of structure would be a loss to the Community.
3. Obtain property owner consent. Approach should be one of cooperation and joint
participation.
4. Criteria for review should be general until resources are known.
5. Produce photograph/visual survey of sites.
6. Do not consider interiors, unless very significant.
REPORT:
Two documents are presented to meet the noted objectives.
1. A one page description of each site including a photograph and comments. (with an
accompanying CD of site photographs and end notes with additional information and
citation has also been provided)
2. An overall ranking of these sites according to merit value. This ranking criteria is based on
the ranking systems provided to us and listed as 'Appendix A' and other criteria as listed in
19.32.060 criteria for designation as proposed by the city ordinance No 1726. Contained in
Appendix A - Historic Merit is a statement not included in the other criteria and is the basis
of the 'Current Protection or Other Status comments also found in this overall ranking. This
statement is found as (a) in that document.
It is the opinion of this committee that upon due consideration, two sites may be compelling
cases for preservation.
A. LA PETIT TRIANON
B. THE CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUB
site ID 12
site ID 14
Four additional sites may be considered less compelling, but of considerable merit.
C. MARYKNOLL
D. P ARRISH TANK
E. BAER BLACKSMITH
F. PICCHETTI BROS.
site ID 4
site ID 6
site ID 7
site ID 3
It should be noted that all six of these sites now have some preservation protection.
A limited number of other structures/sites have some merit but do not meet the criteria,
"compelling", as the concept is understood by this committee.
Downtown Monta Vista, could not be defined, therefore an architectural evaluation could not be
drawn.
Site/structure interiors were not considered significant and not evaluated in this report.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Many of these sites were recommended because of a desire to honor a person who may have
lived in or had a connection with them. Perhaps a more meaningful and informative method
or approach may be to have a suitable memorial in a public park where a history would be
available for public recognition.
2. We recommend that new sites as they might be recommended should have justification
provided by the requesting person, group or organization before acceptance. Appendix A -
Historic Ranking System would be a good model. Its use would provide a merit
comparison with our findings.
3. The committee feels that a number of properties offer significant interest and could well be
included in an historical brochure. ( see item 'i' ) ofthe ' current protection and other status
portion of the Overall Ranking and Comment Summary. This would not require any code or
preservation action.
2
OVERALL RANKING AND COMMENTS
REV 6 9/16/97 A B C 0 E F G H I ACH HIS ENV TOTAL
SITE 10 DESC. AVE AVE RANK
SORTED BY TOTAL POINTS,ARCH,HIST. MAX POINTS 50 30 30 110
12 LE PETIT TRIANON 0 F 35 21 30 86 1
14 DE ORO CWB G 29 25 30 84 2
4 MARYKNOLL H 24 23 30 77 3
6 PARRISH TANK C 20 19 29 68 4
7 BAER BLACKSMITH C 20 20 25 65 5
3 PICCHEITI BROS D F H 14 22 26 62 6
2 MONTEBELLO SCH. 0 F H 10 18 28 56 7
A STEWNG TANK E 10 25 19 54 8
1 1 GAZEBO TRIM A C 21 20 12 53 9
1 PERRO'JE RANCH A* H 10 23 20 53 10
B HAMMOND G H I 22 8 21 51 11
H MIll.ER I 14 16 14 44 12
5 DE LA VEGA G 12 1 1 21 44 13
1 MGITGO\1ERY B* 1 6 22 14 42 14
E RUSS8..HURSr 1 12 17 12 41 15
C TRACY 1 18 3 17 38 16
0 ENGlE 10 12 14 36 17
P HAZEL 10 12 14 36 18
0 LAZANEOTANK E 9 9 18 36 19
G BALDISSINE-ADAMO I 20 12 3 35 20
9 STOCKlM8R 0 26 9 35 21
M <3RtvM 18 4 11 33 22
8 DOYLE WINERY A G 0 21 1 1 32 23
N PALM AVE. A C 0 12 19 31 24
L SCHWARTZ 14 4 12 30 25
J JAMES HOWARD 8 3 18 29 26
K MC CUB BIN I 12 4 1 1 27 27
10 STEPHENS PL A C 0 22 3 25 28
15 ST JOSEPH CH B 0 18 7 25 29
13 UNION CHURCH B 0 17 7 24 30
F WILL . - 8 5 5 18 31
10jilli1 DOWNTOWN MV 0 0 11 11 32
* SEE SITE INFORMATION FOR COMMENT
CURRENT PROTECTION OR OlliER STATUS
A. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE INVOLVED THAT CAN BE SEEN)
B. CURRENT STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED AFTER 1950 WITH NO PORTION ORIGINAL
C.SITEOWNEDBYTHECITYOFCUPERTINO
D. SITE OWNED BY OTHER PUBUC AGENCY
E. SIMILAR TO A SITE OWNED BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
F. NOW PROTECTED BY USTING ON U.S. OR LOCAL CONTROL(HISTORIC SOC. DATA)
G. BY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A DEVELOPEMENT PROJECT
H. SPHERE OF INTEREST ONLY
I. VERY HIGH INTEREST FACTOR. .ms
3
LEGEND
Freeways
cess Routes Shown
Interstate Routes
~
\3---
State Routes
County Routes
0----1
Primary Slreets
Secondary Streets
Cul-De-Sacs
---
Bike Routes
-
Bike lane- -
Civic
· Buildings
~!QP:
G~il Courses
::1 Schools
@>:J
Parks
Reservation Boundaries
o Feet 1000'
I
o Miles
a Kilometers
I
Y..mi.
.50km
,
.......
, 0, ,.f,
:;,n ( ~lJ Compass Maps.-
.~
~ Copynqtll MCMunVlU EdlllOn of 1997
(.'~''i'"'''' M.II'" I...
"'''"to....., CA'l'''!!l
IT
FA
EL.
"0
'"
o
a:
S
ods
el
]
\..
So
"
-'
J
c
:I:
2000'
2
3
..
,
Gree~
~
. as ~ 9 .' \.~ ~.Qh to Santa Clara I
Co > ~ Way ~ 'n~el(le?: e. I"If1~URELWOOO
.... < ~.r Innlon lll1 IELEM. SCH. v.
~ .. ;i5IKennard Wy. g!.'lrl'e~"f'l":!:l" ,,"~,AV . f/"'~''f8Ave.
~ ~ r. .;i'~!.~ I..........'-Qch. 'q'; ~ ~ ~ft'
.!! c (Kintyre Wy. La'!i!!!.I. ~~Kildare "" r "ar :: ~ I'
~:;: ,.1. -Ci. i < ;0 Ave.", 0 ~ .,...".!!! .s Av .'
.~ -g, Lelghjon Wy. ti~ne,!! g ..: ~ ~::IL-e.. "
..- I o~!~11lI ~l:D ~flJ ~~
::IE~ Lome :;: CJ: 'i L~WY,~Lom. ~ La d ~ ~,
~..:.: -co 1'0- ~c:--' non
5. ~ HOMESTEAD ~ 6 ,Il! IJi "I.. Ave. ROADI
5
~~ ~
en ~
~
~ Forge Dr. ; :. 'J;
~fI"'I'C'lVCIYln.~ q, 1 Ca~I,e Ave.
Shasta 7 t ~ Dr. ~
~ Q '!i -
o Dr, b I HiIIsd Ie
'" ~ ~ ~1::1 CI.
0) \,\ulloO ....... ENU E
~'IW '.~o~.t"
(1(110\ .. .". '0/ 0 .!!
c:;\~ '!.~ wy~- ....
~ Su\\\'Ia(\ ~c Dr.. ~ d-l(/)
. ES ,,- .:!l ~ c Ra dolph ve
11 5l ~ 5i ~ ~h:-:"
'" ~." ~ :r:b.l~" COdy Ct
~ aldwin::IE ~ 'i;.!. Ave.
M 0 Hancock Dr. ~ -g Magellan
~ _~~~r~'" ~ ~~
'i'ly
'BLVD. I A,~
A
6 s~~~~~~re J1- 1..1 7 · 8
~!~l ~ 105.51 Inverness' ~
<irkland~a ~ V/i;e IE .,1 oiU'" ~.. ~ <K11 ....
IJ''''' , .9 < La +q> .. K'U" ,g ",Iworth '; 0 :~ ~ BI!I! ,.K be~" r 0
"0 _ IConnor -" I ean ~ t. ~ - , O'"Ci :3 .: < <
:!! ~ . - I s~ .:; g> lIllonCI ~ .!!!l'1ev. ~_.,.". filKII'ar~ % - 0
:::> . ~~ KI, yhlll Ct. - w"~ =~ Wy.rllkenn!! .: a a:
~ o. ."art;! ~ iii r3~~>~~llimbethCI~~~ _.g.",Klrk~~ ~ ~ co;
~ r & Maple r l ~~rt ~ ~ I: E ~-: , Wy. L1m1!t' k g Ct I~ 19 ~~
o ShadYg'~ i4t~.. ~ ,~ ;.~ (\'l'l~4nLondonderr ~ Dr.::IE
- ;00 G ~,~~~ ~'t'l..~s,t NOflt1wlnd Q) ~ ~ ,.- f
8 U ~x V'~N!~ .,.~S. ~ ~ I'~ ~ ~~.- ~ ""rnell PI.
c: I dPOfl ~ LI1~lth z ~~.;}g-'~ >.. "~':7Jl
<0 fSa rt '~ 0 brook.. ooo~r~~OOflflnh ~ ~.!! 0
C I t l!J f/[/O (f) fU' len .. zz 0.; C' "- Q)
U: e es e ala ~ S. <; ~ r'kjfiirk .: p,r c:
I CL J __ mos> ~NO'lh :o~J .LJ ~ c: ~ w
~ _____. a" I - ~eOl'e ~~'- : ..: J..5 LL
~:.:mafJno. ~~ €-€ ~ ~ 0 _...I "E
--....... ~ ~ Lucille Av ~ - L...k:. 3 g ~ -'~A^ ~
c:i co, ~ ~ ~~\ Olivewd ~ ",)>.,!- ::i ~~. ~
Drive ~ <0 "''' ~ Sl~ ~ r3lg~ ~acii E 8,,;:
~ 3: ~ -;:Orange ad ~ \l~'" Dr. 'OG/.
>-- ~ '0 ~fme ,T,. ~eekman PI.~,
AcadIa co ~ 01 :i lr ~r?ire1~'" Ci I i. ~~
......9r ~ u-: a: fi '0 ~~ ~.CI ;'Olru ~-,~ 10
~ ~"..,""'n~~ IUa Ia-ni Ave. er~ 0 U ~L ~_"~~IU l'i. '.!. D~~A~~-:nD -9,~ G ::l
__ Dr . 0) Dr. I'''' COLLINS nr1 ~ Apple Tree.5 oj Ba w .u r" - ~. Vi/. ~Oe~ <
l.!ll? 0 ~ r:5 SCHOOL lti.! c i i O~, '2 ~u ~ ~ ~ "; ~/A (~
ntord D~ ~ CHIlDCAHCENrr. ~ ~ 5~ ~ ~ ~, ~u ~!!. as g! ~ 0 ~090: ~
~ '" a: sc'.~ G a: 5 .!!! Pear free Ln .d ~ <( .~ < .s'~A
rrlF!n Gatel Dr.I W --' --,~r~ ttJfJ.> p,~~ II) nrJPORrAL ~ Q ~T~
c I 0 [l. [l. gJ~;-; ~IIee lJl! SCH. ~... VALLCO ~"1
-= Porlal A h' 0
:Ierg,a '0.>0: . lzaneo :: Q; gCJr.I~:g~'d .... .fl,rW'"9!,t.?-'Park-. _ c m erst r. ;r'
Dr <0 - - OJ C ~ haYJ ya.~ F"""(;I'.",,";'~ <<: 0 F.'&"HION V Ilco "'~
;;: . ; & G IDrive ~ ::E~ a:v,~~~r 0: ~', '::~~~ ~.~ ;;'Rd. w a 3
J Pit &.TI :r: ~J8!. CI '" CI > ~a: liia:t "I a:i ~ Cl -'! ..IL PARK Qj 'k ~v.
.~ ~ li:, artwflght~ C;; ~ ;; Whea n ~ ~ Drive ~'. 0......1 ~ ..' ~
en 0 . SEPH Rem!!!!... 0; a:o .i ~ _ -.:: .:0 <{' /
'ENS CREE z SCHOOL PI;;: ~ BLVD. :z .>C:.i "" ~ If'j 'i ~ I !:rr~VENS / CREEK
~, B ~ ~LAve tJ:~ Linda A ,f I i~ 'i~ C ,:i: iS~Dr. '~~~ i 0)1 1. '2~280 . ~\\ ~~st
<o~ld Drive m ,;:,fb ~ Or 0 iII!!rL';::; g ~Q; ~BI.bY po- 01. t. rc,,'lf. ' e as' => ~ 1 .~U~OI. n San
~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~ ~ ~ cb.'.J ~,~ ~ Or ~ ~ ~'1se. Mr1 n ~ I ~ c: ~ 1:5 _ ose
~ c a; Sunnse Dr. "t: 1>"" . Ayp. .d '?'me Ave. < .:: ~ ~ 01, m.a"esore~~~n lJl! Cr~ l..;c ~ ..:"ll...-""';"" "-
CD '11 - Q Wm er reen.8 0... lW PI rOSh" CUPERTII to I..n. , < IAo/ A \.,.1
Ln.~ ~ Rodriaues Ave, Rodrioues ~6a~e ~ 5 Or 1\~'1:.:: j i .s :.: ~'~ HtGH -lnrF!p' Ave "I";-;\~~ RalX!-&LJ~ ~
1 .. ('''' h Iv. _.ok .~!Y .."... Ondas . C! ;:,!j.)! w~n.. 1:J ff co \~.~'. SakiTa. SCHO L ,~ Dr. 0) ieno Ct.1 0
_= ur." 11 C t H"LL~~ .l.lg r- 'Park.O"- '><tl'l,.,.,\lGreenwoad.r:. '''riel .[(,... r.:.:. >
Cl:? . L < own en r ~ ;;-LasOntlas ~_-,!,.ilJ C I....'~, U Q:' ~~C\'d'1 ~1._Or. g"~ c: C. 'lI' n; Pring
5\ on 3: Cr!'g CI......J~ N Ln.lIBRARl. . - CI~ .. :J..a=>-" '~'EJ,f ")f.' ~.u .- r.~1).' -i;' a; ~ - -<:" :E U CI. >-
;- ~ '~c NI~nCY i1c- I"" .. ~ Library Field ~ ~Somersetli\ \~ ~ g. r:.1!_ ;' La M~~tCal t'ife 'lll,Ceio~ ,_ It!JJ ~ Iii i7. ii C c: Crablree ~
~._'u ~ ~:~:~ e~I!lt:; Dr ~-~~~{)~ ~Ci.t::'.d~~:"J~-gI~I~ '-' In. o~ 5. cD icu V)
-= 0; {2. Ct.;; W , 0 I~:""I' .:i, i'- ::z: t;j. j,o, .... :..!'''''., I. F:~. :::~.' :::E CD > Ct~ rJ)
C OJ "- 0 Pacl!rcaF';'-'.':; "" j!u e Dr. ~ .. .~".. .:I.C-eeksld l!l~ ,~,jl I on A Tilson ~ < Slarrett 1 W
J.~ 3: Cheryl Dr, ~9! SI if ~~~ ~',M-- . __ ~ ve. BAn '- CI"'~ a:.
c c:: -Silverado ~c Sulsun 01 I'!) 0 ,<:0'" 0(\ \,..~.-:., Ph J::o~~Ii1.I-:" arnhart ve. =r Avenue Q..
.."cr.1 ..; ~I,..,:I: ~o ~ ~,,, ~..\ '-7'.= :.' ~..- ::1 l.J!.-J X
~ . en ...J 3:",IOS~1- CHAMBERAve ~ "'iii .::i ? ~ ~,.., ,. 1><i"~'-";'1 <ii ~ ~ <:),. <:i/Pender~n,st Ave .!:f l"f W
'd '" '" C Ln::l OF ~ .. " ~ ~ 0) \oli,,-; ~ ,,-'0' .~,.' .c S -:J '/ . co ~ ~
~~~ C .E 2 > 0 COMM- 51. I ~ ~~ <0 :;; ~ ,;fo..~ vf!" "er -g hady! rove D;;;.,(j b .. G \TuggleAve - /if CI)
g 0 <0 rJ) - > "C - a; = U w D ~ ;l\vo g 0> ~I '" Q - co../
wi~ Lnti: -" ...., ~ 3: F ~~1e~~ r-JgfJn ti. II) al OJ 0 '" ~~.. ,. ~fb 'f.i;.: ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~," )~lC- Ci""- "7,~ Cyn hi '\~.
~;!... Si: Bollinger '~~E \l~CI" g Iu _j "" '~r;y::" \,.'<> .\ ~ c~ ~ g a:os~;y~u OJ g, 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~nro, ~ 'V(~" .~~\<i")~ E
'!~_ Rd. ~ '11/q W = t = .~ -,-; ...... ( '1l' Q< ~:: J <J) :F ~ g' ..., 0 ~ . "- (), '<l ::-"" ~
DeFoe Dr,! ~l9.::;~o~ ~~~a~ ~~O~~AI~or~ 8~or ~~~~E :I:~...!su :mlr~v ll' vO'~: ~ ~^'
I Dumas Dr. os r::: 800. I i gl ~1i IW[! Wy Mvrtlewd ::! HI. lJf1~'1I0wBOLlIN' ~ '1l''!i anna ~"'gk r:;,
liyina~"'D laFlin. a; a; .. r...:.t.!:.!:..ING g: ~ e ~Ave'IROAD :E SCH. g DYe ::~ _ GE elYsoii;1' ~m ~~ Er\~~ _C\-
: Par~ 0 ar 0 r.. i!! OJ "Ijfj)RII< Ii ~v.C CD "'fA P.O.. 9 "!~""' dISk; I" ,-I IIi - i \.'\:
J,'Heatherwood or.h-g <i5 ~ ~ ~ ~rSIr:te' ~~..;; c."..."",~", '1"'$ fiHI~ ,fl! JJ I 'm '"1 fO Ce "
rc~ r- l~ - - g a;;;; r::' I o'!?- '-' IJ'........ .- co Casf 0 Qj Wy o:g j -~J
g ~'i>\\enleaf Ln. ? m Clarendon SI. ~ /} .~ "<1-1,( n' !n)P" " _C: -J l~ ~ .fJ.J ~ Amap, fa Dr ~ ' :;: Greo.!;;b2
__~~ Tiptoe Ln. :):.... ~ 0 C 4' :: ~ It", IVy, l,Hr rial ~~ ......11 i!JTo ~oj 0 a Dr. '-' ! 8; oa; 0," g
~>-;:. 'i>(lford PI. ~i 'H:~ .g -gj-.6:l ~.31 ~ C~ II n~"(.~n"',' ~ 2 ... Ed el ~ ~ ."'::""~DllWoR!fit!lns Or. 1 0 i ~ - 10 ~
'c:>' ~ ...J ~.- m Ill; C\o"i ~ ~ """'lie g - ::1 Dr 10$ .. "'~. itEM. ~Ra dl It 0:: ,..
, o-\\!!.9..dell .:i' I r. Via Vico < ~, I. lJl! 0::.:.. v~~ ~ 7. Wy 15 ~ ~ "" altamo ~ .""". SCN. fJIll!:MIYOOO I '" ,ac=oak vi
ood ~~,p. ,I,.j aMEYERHOLZ v' ~z ~ (5 ...../.- '0" !1- i:' '" ~~~ H' r :l\,.:
I d ~^ t:~ r~I'-! Golden Gate Dr. ~%~ ~ . ~c"'noul'/ a VI'! ~ c/ 0 .J ~C5Jl..frja, k~ '"'7ffI" ~ arZ1er cs' a ..~Ben~l
or .,/, ,,';;, " ",\ ,_ EdQ"'"o ,< r, .,,:; 2 C'~'L "" "" 'I 1. -<: S\ :>
~I ~~~O .: < Blue Hili Dr. ~~T -:;;i~ ~ iii ~ e Prln~ c:.!? OA~'~ ",' ;-.,.. * '- . .
3nder (i<' 0: lU N c::: . ':1 r.e -.0() ::I Windsor Ln > 2'" 0 :lb ~Ttt<.J ~ ~ c:- c: 0 'lIt! ~ \
;~~ "'P~. Q'''~z II Phvllis AV8L /~, danr~ae~Dr'" ~ BanclOft '4: Wy. ":CC r. "'5/Fa1r'orcr ~ ~ ~ ~ Cr Dan -g :
[_ KmQsbur:t...p" Ve.< Rark ~ Lane ~al;,bms -~ ~. ad = ounteSSDrf/ll'lf ~ ..,. ~ .-:;: ".:::. '
g.IriM'~~ '''" ~ w - ~ n - 0' Park ';:.: ~ OF!von"hirF! 01, ~r . S 8. MILLER JR, '~ ~ (j ~ 8 3 -' (;ast/e ~ h
~ 0 ,n ""~O COlnn"lir Ilr _.~.::: ",: 0) > C.L ^," ni '" nrJ HIGH ,if " -<: "':X: I
g..9a i'liden GardP 5' ~ ^. ' I OJ; :~ c: FIRE a r '5l m I'" Z IJI! SCH. 0 0 tf t] _ Glen l.>i. ' 4J
~~~k"t:-G"d~~' uaIItGaIllDr.J:gi~'n~\~~"~1iii'r C"Inh"", .5 't...- nrk ",'-,-;. '.3 ':;'1 ~R~ ;'/ve.!;i
'~~lnh};.!l'~~" C''R~ Co CI. - - ~ . . - - - -- 0 Ralnbow~ --- fJf1 CI. 1'le72/', t, 0') i;j
o.:a >- f\ -:':', ,WestmoorWy, :: Hanover 5 01, \/Val brook ~~ I. !'~~'l.t:.!; LYNBROOK ~(~ ,"" ( it'
~e Blossom ~ 3::;; " [\..Xh :0'';-''';'' > Vv ~ 2, :>. nrJ .>C Tucker Or, J ~ ~ "'........ ,~~ "':') HIGH SCHOOL '(\,,\~;~ ~ g':: ~
~, ;0 f0~' ~ ~ ~ 0 03: lJl! 0 - ~ ~'"J ~~ I 01>'<'.... " .. 0 ~
Blossom Dr Flo~rZ ~ C; ~ ~ OJ 0 0) E MUIR e~ I 01 I 0 > <f' ~.... -C:) ':! a go ~ -.J
'ii' I ~ ~ - 0 '" I ~ E > C ELEM J:l 11 Dr. .2' .. ay, r-...... I .r. C a:
mandvW~ ~ ~ u Chanlel..{\ ~ ~ ~ :> Qj;5 ~ SCH, ~ Vle'nna 3: Ro ;J' A- i'....""-.. ->< ,.a'l1eMano, 0;
<u ~wy. t-9ct: ~ c: u -- 0 _ CJ :9~' Uu nn Dr. c: c:(>.;:" ffJc(f$
vcaslleDr '" IWllpflower I L....., \~ ~ .9 ~:II: en Wi teri" <( Or W-t- g -" i~- /.?o" e'" :;:!~J D""o Kavonr;;-
~ . - \~. Q) ca Ai >- JS ~ e (; lie 0 G2
lerfordDr c'i PI,: ~ossom Sharon... 1'.~Wlndsor WYDar mtll r Way ~ . ~ J.IV ~ ~~ ;r -; c'i c ~.. ~ ~ ~ !J ... 0,"0 ~~~II t,/
c. Dr) ,. Ii- < an. :::I CD 8.. ",<:::a__. 0 :r CI) *", ...~
~rb~'~~;';~"'e ~ ~ ~ ~~~tt d %' von r ~ 'Ln..~ ~ _ ~ Wy ~ ~.~ -;,- ~c elar,. 0 1f.7~ c/'~~('6'" QI.
I IQi - a. 0 ::l ~ G ~ 'l> Wy 0 'O.c ,,~~ :> I a mouth Ave-'< '" rOOkhavonOr./6~ "'?l, ojl
J'.' Done at ~ ~ 0 y. ~~ a '&" g.5 ~ g g 1 .g ~ ;;::: w Squlredell ~~~ ~ie&i'll/eetrI: '" ~co qi',,+' if . ~ "-':,}.?i
'8L\'I~\\ PIOJ rJ) B .,-~~ ,.. ~~ 'il ~ 9.~ B'belAve. i EI_ raelDr. 'i: ~ gMa ~Ok~"1lJ ~o i:;,!:? I!!
~n. E rl~bane.,w g a ~ Q,) ro..; _ " e OJ .S' .- 10 er noli Q ~v \1) ~ ..f!!,IE c:-
'.loover iOlc5 ~'... ~ (Wy, -l a; u~~.'!."or ~,~tilher. 'E 0 <0 I~y In. .5 C I ;;; Dr. ~ - ~~ '. CI. .~U~~o(( <" 7~J t8.:;. If -J
.....!...k H . l'(~ i~, d (,) .>0: '" I 01 0 Q ~ P,lgnm "" ". Af 8
~ ..,;. ;'I'!II' 0 I:'ij PROSPECTI~-;' ~ m~r~1 - 0 o!!! Av~ '''0+ ~ i '1' En Ii.h 1;;"'~
\ ~~~I g 1,51 s~~~~,~Oga and It> 85 CI. ~ 5~ ~~:'DA\ ~ .:} 1" I ~.: ~I,CIi" n CD ~ ROA c, Prospoc, Rd,;
?\~~ >~(f ) Los Galos ::: , <:l 'CUW~_. >. ~ "f' I .!!! ...J .= ~ 0 0
..... ():.k Rrl/"p,l\':)f\(\ /' ~ ~ ~ ~ t= nO:; ..n ~'\
8
!!:
G2
oj
>
<(
~
3=
~B
w
a:
Q.
X
W
~i~ ~!
! i:: ~-
i~ ~ ~
.. ~ ~
;
10
ey
.
w
o
z
w
a:
~
...J
(
~~m
~ g~!;
~lg
IU ~i
~~~ j!
i~ ~~
i.t:; ,;
~~ ~ ~
1= ;
i~
-
Hfm
.. J'-'
i{~H
~ ~it
,.;a
~~
q
=~~
~f=
i3~
~~~
-,i .
.- ~
.
F
f~ ~
i3 f
... $ ~
hi
g ~ ~
. ~ :
, <5
=. a:
; ~
'; ::
.
ffih
~! ~f a:
i;:;~ ~
"';t
.~
G
~
,
i
SUMMARY OF APPENDIX B PROPERTIES- PROFILES OF SITES
The following is a summary of the properties that the committee was asked to evaluate for the
purpose of possible protection by the City of Cupertino. The historical, architectural and
environmental value of each site was discussed and ranked based on committee visitations and
research.
Community Landmarks Committee Summary
1. Summary comments of Monte Vista retail and commercial properties:
Little of the original downtown commercial Monte Vista is left. There are two properties that
still have original buildings on them, the Engle Grocery and the Hazel Goldstone Variety Store,
though neither are of particular architectural value. The Engle Variety Store is now the Monte
Vista Inn and the variety store houses a print shop. Individually these buildings have historicall
significance, however, fue properties are not contiguous and therefore do not represent a
"downtown" configuration. Because the surrounding businesses are, for the most part,
representative of a much later development, much of the historical feeling and buildings have
been lost in the area. The committee did not rank this area with the other properties.
6
HISTORICAL SITES LISTED IN GENERAL PLAN (FIGURE 2F)
1. Perrone Ranch Stone Cellar: part of Ridge Vineyards
Location: Montebello Ridge Road
Ownership status: Private/other
ifii;.
,- -
~ "'!!iOoI
~ w ~~
,.!-. 1, ~ '>-:-" , - n .,; >:'"I..!
_ ." . ... oJ,:....,. _ _::~
..J.." .... ,.l,or- tlI !;t... T
.:: "",,L-:,<!<<;~.tL '~ _ - .- ~
Built by Osaea Perrone, a wealthy San Francisco physician, the cellar was part of the winery he
established in the foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains. The winery produced many award-
winning wines during its peak period. The cellar was constructed in the late 1880s. A house was
built over the cellar about 1910. The property is in excellent condition and is cUlTently in the
Midpeninsula Regional Park District and is maintained by that agency. The cellar is not visible
because of the house that still covers the structure. 1
The committee awarded 53 of a possible 110 points.
Overall ranking: 10
7
2. Montebello School, 1892
Location: 15101 Montebello Road
Ownership status: Public (Montebello School District)
The Montebello school was built for the children of Montebello Ridge by the Picchetti family in
1892. It was moved from its original site after 1975 so that a new school could be built. The
structure remains largely in its original state, though the windows are new, and the roof is of
modern materials. Though there is no architectural value to the school, it does have significant
historical value and has been kept in good condition. 2
The committee awarded 56 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 7
8
3. Picchetti Brothers Winery and Ranch
Location: 13100 Montebello Road
Ownership status: Public (Mid-Peninsula Open Space District)
~
"
-=
~
.<1--
- ~',.- ~
Founded in 1872 by Italian immigrant Vincenso Picchetti, the winery was built, along with a
house, in the 1870s. The Pichettis first developed their vineyard to produce grapes for other
wineries in the area. In 1896 the first labels using their own name, the Montebello, were
produced. They built a red brick building two stories high, the top level storing ranch equipment.
The main floor held redwood wine tanks. The entire winery is now part of the Midpeninsula
Regional Park District and is preserved and maintained by that agency. 3
The committee awarded 62 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 6
9
4. Maryknoll Seminary
Location: 2300 Cristo Rey Drive
Ownership status: Private/other (Diocese of San Jose)
'...
The Maryknoll Seminary was constructed in 1926 by the Catholic Church as a training center for
missionaries destined for China. The seminary portion was closed in 1968, but it still serves as a
resthome for retired missionaries. The building was designed by Boston architects McGinnis and
Walsh and is unique to the area. The building was severely damaged in the 1989 Lorna Prieta
earthquake, but has been repaired and has a new roof. The courtyard of the Church (on the west
side) is a cemetery for the missionaries. The grounds are well cared for, as is the building, though
access has been restricted since the earthquake. 4
The committee awarded 77 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 3
10
5. De La Vega Tack House
Location: 10805 Stevens Canyon Road
Ownership status: Private/other
The large horse barn, the last remnant of the estate of De La Vega, is now part of a gated
community. The barn has been restored and incorporated into the Rancho Deep Cliff
development. There is little of the -original structure left, though the rebuilding and refurbishing
was done in the period. The original structure was built in 1909, with the refurbishing done in the
1980s.5
The committee awarded 48 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 13
11
6. Enoch J. Parish Tank House
Location: McClellan Ranch Park
Ownership status: Public (City of Cupertino)
Born in Kentucky in 1858, Enoch Parish came to the Santa Clara Valley in 1879 where he
worked on a ranch and studied carpentry. He purchased 15 acres on the comer of what is now
Mary and Stevens Creek in 1883 where he built his tank house. Seven years later he built a large
Victorian and in 1906 added a barn. Because of his skill in building and design, Parish is
responsible for many homes in the Cupertino area, as well as the San Jose Union store and the
Union Church of Cupertino. The Tank House is now located on city property. 6
The committee awarded 68 of 110 points
Overall ranking: 4
12
7. Replica Baer Blacksmith Shop in McClellan Ranch
Location: McClellan Ranch Park
Ownership status: Public (City of Cupertino)
--- ~~
~- -----:-
~
- --
The Charley Baer House was originally at the comer of Stevens Creek and Saratoga/Sunnyvale
Road (Highway 9). The house was built by William T. Baer, Charley's father, who also built the
first Blacksmith shop in Cupertino. The shop was closed after the death of William, but Charley
built a replica behind his house. The replica was moved to McClellan Ranch Park. The barn at
the site dates from the 1890s and is also on city property. 7
The committee awarded 65 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 5
13
8. Doyle Winery Site (foundation only)
Location: visible from McClellan Ranch Park
Ownership status: Private/other
John D. Doyle is credited with naming Cupertino. Doyle established a large winery in the area in
the 1870s, called the Cupertino Wine Company, at the corner of McClellan Road and Foothill
Boulevard. The 1906 earthquake severely damaged the buildings and the winery was not put
back into service. All that remains is a partial foundation on the McClellan Park property. 8
The committee awarded 32 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 23
~
14
9. Louis StockJmeir Home
Location: 22120 Stevens Creek Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
\.
~1~~
.,. " .
The Stocklmeir home was originally a simple farm house of no particular architectural note. The
home has been extensively modified over the years with little of the original structure visible.
The significance of the property is a result of the contributions of Louis Emil Stocklmeir, a noted
local businessman and historian. He was the first president of the Trianon Foundation, formed to
restore "Le Petit Trianon" (Historic Site #12).9
The committee awarded 47 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 21
15
10. Site of Elisha P. Stephen's Home, 1950; Part of Blackberry Farm
Location: Blackberry Farm
Ownership status: Public (City of Cupertino)
--'-.r-
~t ".~ lIf
,
, . ;':~:',:... $,:
.,'. '.
,.:;r
f:'
, '
" '. . ' :
~
'l'I'<}r
',;
c" ,
, "~,';'\'.;
," .; '.~
~i,' '. ."
... "~t>..,.. .'~ I~.
Captain Elisha P. Stevens successfully guided the Martin Murphy-Townsend party from Council
Bluffs to Sutter's Fort in 1844. He settled in the Cupertino area in 1848, establishing Blackberry
Farm. He left the area in 1864 and a resort hotel was built on the property, which operated until
1906 when the earthquake destroyed it. The site is now marked with a historic recognition
plaque. 10
The committee awarded 25 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 28
16
11. Gazebo and Gingerbread Trim - Memorial Park
Location: Memorial Park
Ownership status: Public (City of Cupertino)
All that remains of the Parish house is the strip of trim on the Gazebo located in Memorial Park.
A Plaque has been installed to commemorate the site. 11
The committee awarded 53 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 9
17
12. Le Petit Trianon
Location: 21250 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Ownership status: Public (De Anza College)
Charles Baldwin had a home built for his new bride in 1887 on what is now DeAnza Community
College. The home was designed by San Francisco architect Willis Polk who was referred to as
the "enfant terrible of western architecture" because he led California into Period design which
adopted aspects of classical Baroque. After their marriage, the Baldwin's called their home
"Beaulieu"; today the building is most commonly known as "Le Petit Trianon". Baldwin also
built a large stone winery and underground cellars that are still located on the campus. 12
The committee awarded 86 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 1
18
13. Union Church of Cupertino
Location: 20900 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Ownership status: Private/other
../
,.-
./
~
~
..~
......:';f"
---.a...~.~ ~ '..:::::.. _ I
.. ,,' -~' .-.~ ...~~.....~ ~ ..--
-."- . . - -:.2J
Protestants of the west side (Cupertino) did not have a place to worship until 1884 when the
Cupertino Union parish was formed and the first structure was built and incorporated in the same
year. The church was built on land donated by Alex Montgomery. A second Union church was
built in 1907 and the present structure (built in 1958 on its present site) is a modern chapel with
additional frame buildings behind it. 13
The committee awarded 24 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 30
19
14. Cupertino De Oro Club (Old CoIlins School)
Location: 20441 Homestead Road
Ownership status: Private/other
The Collins School was first built at the corner of Homestead Road and Highway 9. Captain
Leman Perry Collins sold an acre of his land for the school, which was named in his honor. The
school was originally a one-room building designed by J. O. McKee and built by Enoch Parrish
in 1889. Additions in 1908 and in 1914 brought it to its current size of four rooms. The school
was closed in 1921 and it became the de Oro Clubhouse. In 1959 the school was moved to its
current location with the widening of Homestead Boulevard. In 1996/97 aID foot section was
added to the rear of the building. 14
The committee awarded 84 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 2
20
15. St. Joseph Church
Location: 10110 North De Anza Boulevard
Ownership status: Private/other
The original church was built on land donated by Alex Montgomery on the site where the current
church is located. The original building was heavily Spanish Mission in architectural style and
completed in 1907. The current sanctuary was build in 1953. There is no part of the original
church visible. 15
The committee awarded 25 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 29
21
Other Historic Resources
A. Stelling Tank House
Location: End of Festival, off Stelling Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
-d
~
---!
The Stelling Tank House sits on the remaining property of the Stelling family farm. On the
property is a barn that is in poor condition and a house which is not one of the original structures.
The tank house is in reasonably good condition, having been restored after a severe storm
damage. The Stelling family was one of the original families of the area, and their farming
interests developed much of the west end of Cupertino. 16
The Committee awarded 54 out of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 8
22
B. Hammond-Haines House
Location: 22961 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Between Gate of Heaven Cementery and
Permanente)
Ownership status: Public (City of Cupertino)
The house dates back to the 1880s, having been built by John Snyder for his daughter after her
marriage to W. H. Hammond in 1881. The property is currently on the Santa Clara County
Historical Houses register. The house is currently occupied and the resident has not welcomed
visitors, which has made assessment difficult. The house appears to be a good example of the
architecture of the period and may warrant further study. The house is currently owned by the
Catholic Diocese, however, ownership status may change in the next two years. 17
The committee awarded 51 out of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 11
23
C. Tracy House
Location: 10855 North Stelling Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
I
I
I
-- -- .-:::----~I
-- I
.. ...,.
~,\; .,-:;.'?
:,;
.. .
This is one of the more interesting properties from an architectural standpoint. The house was
built by Enoch Parrish and has many interesting architectural oddities and a variety of styles. It
was moved to the present location in 1937 from Lawrence Road. The preservation of this house
may well hinge on whether or not it can be moved. It currently sits on valuable commercial
property (10855 N. Stelling Road), and needs a good deal of work if it is, to be preserved.18
The committee awarded 38 out of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 16
24
D. Lazaneo Tank House
Location: 19985 Price @ South Blaney
Ownership status: Private/residence
l7 __
The Lazaneo Tank House has had major modifications over the years. There are windows both
upstairs and down and it has obviously been used as a living area or work shop for some time.
The tank house was built in the 1920s. 19
The committee awarded 36 out of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 19
25
E. Russelhurst Country Club
Location: 22273 Cupertino Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
The Russelhurst Country Club was built during the Monte Vista growth period as a club house in
the 1920s by George Hensley, a land promoter. Mr. Russell, who occupied the house and named
it Russelhurst was also responsible for a 20 acre real estate development in the area. A second
story was added at a later time. The house is currently occupied and looks to be in good
condition.20
The committee awarded 41 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 15
26
F. Will House
Location: 10191 Vista Drive
Ownership status: Private/residence
..
"W-~-1II... _
The Will house is another home build by Mr. Patterson in the Monte Vista area. The house is in
excellent condition though it has been extensively altered from the original structure. The home
has no particular historical or architectural significance. 21
The committee awarded 18 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 31
27
G. Baldissini - Adamo House
Location: 7498 Prospect Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
C'
....
.. ---
1D~.. ~,,~,?:~,,~"'~~C~;''':~.:''';i;,.~:;,\:~~f,;:o_.',:;::~~~"t~;~
~~~t
~~;;;-;- ....;J~ .........
~
-~._~
--", -:. '::
Built and designed by Enoch Parrish, the Baldissini - Adamo House has had minor alterations
over the years. The house appears to be in very good condition. The historic value of the home is
due, in large part, to the builder and the condition of the home. 22
The committee awarded 35 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 20
28
H. Miller House
Location: 19340 Phil Lane
Ownership status: Private/residence
The Miller house is the original home of the Miller ranch. There was until recently a barn and
other out buildings. The house was restored and moved as the condition for approval to develop
the property. The house has a historical plaque and is in excellent condition. The house was built
in the 1880s by Elias Miller and was later occupied by Francis Miller Parrish.23
The committee awarded 44 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 12
29
I. Arch Wilson House (Montgomery House)
Location: 1008 Crescent Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
One of the "founding fathers" of Cupertino, Alex Montgomery, donated land for schools, served
as the first postmaster of Cupertino and built the general store at the crossroads. His nephew,
Arch Wilson, also served as postmaster and used the materials from his uncle's home to build a
large home on Stevens Creek Blvd., at the site of the Marie Callender restaurant. The home, or
more correctly the two homes in one, has been moved to the Monta Vista area and is in excellent
shape. Because of the historical significance of both Montgomery and Wilson, the property
scored high in the Historic Category, even though the home has undergone major renovation. 24
The committee awarded 42 Of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 14
30
J. James Howard House
Location: 10505 Miller Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
Built in the late 1880s , the James Howard house is currently being used as a church office by the
Baptist Church; the house is located on church property. The house is in poor condition and
would need - among other things, a new foundation, roof and structural work. The architectural
style is late 19th century farm house. The windows are unusual for the area (long and narrow)
and add a frontier look to the house. 25
The committee awarded 29 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 26
31
K. Robert McCubbin House
Location: 10505 Miller Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
I
--
..-- --..
~
~
Robert McCubbin immigrated to the United States in 1849, settling in the Santa Clara Valley in
1854. After trying to raise stock, he settled into grain farming in 1861. He married Elizabeth
Bubb in 1864 and bought a 290 acre farm in the Cupertino area in 1868. The house was moved to
its present location from Stevens Creek Blvd., and serves as a parsonage for the Baptist church
on Miller A venue. The house has been completely renovated and is in excellent condition. 26
The committee awarded 27 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 27
32
L. Schwartz House
Location: 22410 Cupertino Road
Ownership status: Private/residence
II
-"'--;,-:;" .."...
_ ...;;a--
. ._'-~',
.~.....,.
,
,~--
Credited to the building skills of Enoch Parrish, the Schwartz house has had many changes over
the years. There are modem windows, a new roof design and it has been placed on a new
foundation. The house is in the old Monte Vista area and is not a particularly outstanding
example of the period, though it is in excellent condition. 27
The committee awarded 30 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 25
33
M. George Grimm House
Location: 790 Blaney
Ownership status: Private/residence
iiiii ...
- ...,
-- -..
.--
-- ;:
=-
......::!II
~=~]
---'-'_~l
00;;;;;.. 0;;;;;
=
~'-"~'.'- -
~A" -.""",.. .~ _
This home, built by Parrish (1880-1890), is another good example of the typical farm house
architecture in the area. The house is shingled and has undergone upgrading (Windows, roof, etc.
) as have many of the older buildings in the area. The architecture is not unique and there is
limited historical impact by the various families who have lived there. 28
The committee awarded 33 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 22
34
N. Palm Avenue (street including palm trees)
Location: Palm Avenue at Foothill Boulevard
Ownership status: Public (City of Cupertino)
t. .
t',.: :
I f
r
"'1'- .
~,-
~""':'t.. '
~~:,--;r..:.
, ",.~
""..,
Palm Avenue used to lead to the grape crushing works for the Doyle Winery. The only part of
the winery left is a partial foundation and the palms that now line the street. 29
The committee awarded 31 of 110 points
Overall ranking: 24
35
o. Engle Grocery
Location: 21619 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Ownership status: Private/other (commercial)
,,'
".
Elizabeth Engle's grocery is one of the two remaining buildings on Stevens Creek Blvd. that
represent the original Monta Vista business community. The building now serves as a bar and
has undergone major renovations since it was first built. 30
..
. .
The committee awarded 36 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 17
36
..
..
..
P. Hazel Goldstone Variety Store
Location: 21700 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Ownership status: Private/other (commercial)
This is the other remaining business in the old Monta Vista business area on Stevens Creek
Boulevard. This building has been greatly modified and bears little resemblance to the original
building. 31
The committee awarded 36 of 110 points.
Overall ranking: 18
37
END NOTES - Historical Sites listed in General Plan (Figure 2-F)
1. Osea Perrone called his 60 acres vineyards the Mira Valle. At its peak, Dr. Osea
Perrone developed a 180 acre vineyard at the top of Montebello Ridge. The
wines were well received at the 1895 Bordeaux Exposition (honorable mention),
the 1896 Atlanta and Brussels wine tasting (medals), and 1900 Paris Exposition
(gold medal). Stephen M. Payne, Santa Clara County: Harvest of Change,
(Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc. 1987), p. 80. Phyllis Filiberti Butler,
The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-1920, (San Jose: Junior League
of San Jose, Inc., 1975), pp. 115.
2. Phyllis Filiberti Butler, The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-
1920, (San Jose: Junior League of San Jose, Inc., 1975), p. 114. Pauline Pace, ed.,
Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1975), p. 20.
3. Vincenso Picchetti was born in 1842 in Northern Italy and immigrated to
Cupertino California in 1872. Mer working as a dairyman in Salinas, he found a
job working for Villa Maria - the retreat for Jesuits of Santa Clara University. He
encouraged his brother, Secondo, and sister-in-law, Teresa, to immigrate to the
US and help him at Villa Maria. Following the suggestions of the Jesuits, the two
brothers bought 160 acres for $1,500 on Montebello Ridge. They called their new
home Monte Bello. The first house was built in the 1870s. Secondo and Teresa
lived on the ridge for a number of years before moving to San Jose. In 1882,
Vincenso returned to Italy to marry Teresa Cicoletti. Vincenso and Teresa lived
and worked at Villa Maria before permanently moving to Monte Bello. The
Pichettis first developed their vineyard to produce grapes for other wineries. It
was not until 1896 that they withdrew their life savings of $8,000 to open their
own winery, using the Montebello label. They built a red brick building two
stories high. The top level stored ranch equipment, the main floor held redwood
wine tanks and oak casks, and the entrance to the stone cellar was decorated
with hand-made wood carvings. The winery is now part of the Midpeninsula
Regional Park District. Tish Picchetti, IIMore Comprehensive Story on the
Vincenso- Picchetti Family, May 5, 1990," Cupertino Historical Museum, Family
History drawer, Cupertino, California; IIR.V. Garrod1s Saratoga Stories: Picchettis
withdraw $8,000 to build winery just before bank fails,1I Saratoga News, (10
January 1979), p. 8, California Historical Museum, Family History drawer,
Cupertino, California; Stephen M. Payne, Santa Clara County: Harvest of
Change, (Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc. 1987), p. 79. Phyllis
Filiberti Butler, The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-1920, (San
Jose: Junior League of San Jose, Inc., 1975), p. 115. Pauline Pace, ed., Santa Clara
County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1975), p. 19.
4. Marcotte, Henrietta and Hines, Ann eds., Santa Clara County Heritage
Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1979), p. 19.
38
5. Phyllis Filiberti Butler, The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-
1920, (San Jose: Junior League of San Jose, Inc., 1975), p. 115. Pauline Pace, ed.,
Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1975), p. 19.
6. Besides being a well known carpenter in Cupertino, Enoch J. Parrish served
the community as the butcher. Enoch and his brother P.J. Parrish delivered meat
to families throughout the west side. His butcher shop was located in the
basement of his home. The house burned in June 1975. The gingerbread trim is
now on the gazebo in Memorial Park. "The Garden of the World" Biographical
Sketches, California History Center, Cupertino, California ;Phyllis Filiberti
Butler, The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-1920, (San Jose: Junior
League of San Jose, Inc., 1975), p. 115. Pauline Pace, ed., Santa Clara County
Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1975), p. 19. History of Cupertino -
Part II, presented by Henrietta Marcotte to the Cupertino Historical Museum
Docents, [May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical Museum, Subject File, Cupertino,
California, p. 2-4.
7. Pauline Pace, ed., Santa Gara County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose,
CA: 1975), p. 19. History of Cupertino - Part II, presented by Henrietta Marcotte
to the Cupertino Historical Museum Docents, [May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical
Museum, Subject File, Cupertino, California, p. 2. Phyllis Filiberti Butler, The
Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-1920, (San Jose: Junior League of
San Jose, Inc., 1975), p. 115. Marcotte, Henrietta and Hines, Ann eds., Santa Clara
County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1979), p. 19.
8. The wines of John T. Doyle's Cupertino Wine Company won awards in the
1890s, including the Columbian Exposition in 1890, silver medal at Bordeaux,
France in 1895, honor at Berlin Exposition in 1895. Stephen M. Payne, Santa
Clara County: Harvest of Change, (Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc.
1987), p. 79.
9. Louis Emil Stocklmeir contributed to the community as a civil engineer,
businessman, historian, and civic leader. He was born October 28, 1982 in Los
Gatos. .His family moved to Cupertino in 1900. Stocklmeir graduated from
Stanford University in 1916. After graduation he became the assistant highway
engineer of Santa Clara County and later the resident engineer for a naval dry
dock in San Francisco. From 1917 to 1919 Stocklmeir changed his profession by
joining the army and serving as a Second Lieutenant in the US Artillery --
stationed in the US and France. Soon after returning to civilian life, in 1920, he
drew upon his engineering experience to work for an association that combined
civil engineering and an insurance brokerage. This experience was good training
for his own engineering and insurance company that he established under his
own name. As a historian, Stocklmeir was dedicated to the preservation of old
buildings in Cupertino. He was the first president, 1969 to 1970, of the Trianon
Foundation which was created to restore "Le Petit Trianon" (Historic Site #12 in
the General Plan). He also was a member of numerous historical organizations
including the Historical Societies of San Jose and Cupertino, Sunnyvale
39
Historical Society and Museum Association, Los Gatos Museum Association,
Saratoga Historical Foundation, and many more. Stocklmeir was also involved
with the development of Cupertino. He participated in numerous civil activities
including preliminary work for incorporation of Cupertirio, Cupertino Union
School District Bond issues, bond issue work for the Santa Clara County Flood
Control District, Water Commissioner for the Cupertino Municipal Water
District, De Anza College Bond Issue, and Chamber of Commerce of Cupertino.
"International Biographical Centre, Cambridge CB2 3QP, England, International
Public Relations Agency, Biographical Portfolio prepared for Louis E. Stocklmeir,
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA, 95014, USA,n Cupertino
Historical Museum, Cupertino, California.
10. Pauline Pace, ed., Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose,
CA: 1975), p. 19.
11. Enoch Parrish's Victorian house was built in 1890. The house was in disrepair
for many years before it burned down in 1975. "The Garden of the World"
Biographical Sketches, California History Center, Cupertino ;Phyllis Filiberti
Butler, The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings, 1792-1920, (San Jose: Junior
League of San Jose, Inc., 1975), p. 115. Pauline Pace, ed., Santa Clara County
Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1975), p. 19. History of Cupertino -
Part II, presented by Henrietta Marcotte to the Cupertino Historical Museum
Docents, [May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical Museum, Subject File, Cupertino,
California, p. 2-4.
12. Charles Baldwin was the son of Rear-Admiral Charles H. Baldwin who
captained Commodore Vanderbilt's yacht. Although Baldwin had never served
in the navy, residents of Cupertino called him "Admiral." Baldwin married Ella
Hobart, the daughter of the Comstock silver tycoon, in 1897. Baldwin was
Cupertino's first resident millionaire. Baldwin's 78 acres estate was called
Miraflores and included swimming pools, polo fields, and French automobiles.
Baldwin was educated in England. He moved to Cupertino when he was 26 and
purchased 70 acres of land for his vineyard. The grapes vines were gathered
from the Bordeaux and Graves regions of France. He bottled his wines under the
name Beaulieu and sold it in New York, London, and Central America. The
Baldwins moved from "Beaulieu" in 1908 to Colorado after Ella Baldwin
contracted tuberculosis. The following year they sold Beaulieu to Francis J.
Carolan -- a San Francisco millionaire. The Carolans sporadically lived in
Beaulieu while they built a 92-room French chateau in Burlingame. Possibly
Mrs. Carolan re-named Beaulieu as "Le Petit Trianon." The estate became the site
for De Anza College in 1965. The house was moved to its current location when
the college built the Flint Center. Currently it is California History Center
Foundation. Phyllis Filiberti Butler, The Valley of Santa Clara: Historic Buildings,
1792-1920, (San Jose: Junior League of San Jose, Inc., 1975), pp. 109-111. Pauline
Pace, ed., Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1975),
p.20.
40
13. The second Union Church was built in 1907. And then a third was built in
1958 at its current location on Stevens Creek. History of Cupertino - Part II,
presented by Henrietta Marcotte to the Cupertino Historical Museum Docents,
[May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical Museum, Subject File, Cupertino, California,
p.4.
14. Pauline Pace, ed., Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose,
CA: 1975), p. 19; Marcotte, Henrietta and Hines, Ann eds., Santa Clara County
Heritage Resource Inventory, (San Jose, CA: 1979), p. 19; History of Cupertino -
Part II, presented by Henrietta Marcotte to the Cupertino Historical Museum
Docents, [May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical Museum, Subject File, Cupertino,
California, p. 6-7; "First Cupertino School Dates Back to 1865," Cupertino
Courier, 21 April 1960, Cupertino Historical Museum, Subject Drawer, General
History file, Cupertino, California.
15. History of Cupertino - Part II, presented by Henrietta Marcotte to the
Cupertino Historical Museum Docents, [May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical
Museum, Subject-File, Cupertino, California, p. 4.
16. The Stelling family was important contributors to the development of
agriculture in Cupertino. Beginning in the 1850s, John and Louise Stelling gave
up their brick making business in San Francisco to become orchardists. They
established a tree nursery in what is now Blackberry Farm. They had five
children, three boys Oohn, Ed, Henry), and two girls (Lizzie and Tilly). All three
boys continue to work in agriculture, but only Henry stayed in Cupertino.
Henry and his wife Alice Helwig purchased 70 acres on Hollenbeck Road. They
grew cherries, cornice, pears, and walnuts. Henry was also known for working
as a director for the California Fruit Exchange, being the first trustee of the
Fremont Union High School District, participating in fraternal societies (Mason,
Knight Templar, and Shriners), and preparing a charter for Santa Clara County.
Henry's son, Donald, continued to run the family ranch. Donald distinguished
himself by becoming a director for the California Fruit Exchange, the president of
the Santa Oara County Cherry Growers Association, a chairman of the Santa
Clara County Republican Central Committee, and member of the Cupertino
Grammar School Board. Miriam Calvert Stelling, "Stelling, February 1992,"
Cupertino Historical Museum, Family History drawer, Cupertino, California;
Miriam Calvert Stelling, "Henry G. Stelling, March 1991," Cupertino Historical
Museum, Family History drawer, Cupertino, California.
17 Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources for
this site and its former residents
18. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents
19. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
41
20. George Hensley was known as the Olympic Club's Amateur Wrestling
Champion of the Pacific Coast and the promotor and developer for the Peninsula
Land and Investment Co. liThe Monta Vista Story," Cupertino-Monta Vista
Courier, 24 April 1968, sec. 2, pgs. 17-19, Cupertino Historical Museum, Subject
drawer, Monta Vista file, Cupertino, California.
21. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
22. Joseph Adamo was active in the Cupertino community. He served on the
Cupertino Planning Commission (1960-63) and Architectural Site Control
Committee. He was also a member of the Knights of Columbus (4th degree) and
Holy Name Society at the St. Joseph Church. Clipping on Joseph Adamo from
the Cupertino Courier, Family History Book - Museum Founder, Cupertino
Historical Museum, Cupertino, California.
23. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
24. Alex Montgomery greatly contributed to the development of Cupertino by
donating an acre of land for the first Protestant church and the Horticulture
Viticulture Association Hall. He also built the West Side Branch of the San Jose
Home Union in 1898. This store held the post office and was located at the
southwest comer of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. In his
will, Montgomery left 10 acres on the South West comer of Stevens Creek and De
Anza Blvd. to his nephew Arch Wilson. Arch Wilson built his home on this
property. History of Cupertino - Part II, presented by Henrietta Marcotte to the
Cupertino Historical Museum Docents, [May 5, 1990], Cupertino Historical
Museum, Subject File, Cupertino, California, p. 2. Written by Miriam Calvert
Stelling, friend of the Montgomery and Wilson families, [August 1992],
Cupertino Historical Museum, Family History Drawer, Cupertino, California.
"Ex-Cupertino Mayor Warner Wilson dies," Cupertino Courier, Cupertino
Historical Museum, Family History drawer, Cupertino, California.
25. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
26. The McCubbin ranch was devoted to hay and wheat, and also included
orchards, livestock, and horses. liThe Garden of the World" Biographical
Sketches, California History Center, Cupertino, California.
27. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
28. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
42
29. For information about the Doyle Winery refer to Stephen M. Payne's Santa
Clara County: Harvest of Change, (Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc.
1987), p. 79.
30. Elizabeth Engle's grocery was one of the first commercial services available to
serve the Monta Vista Subdivision A in the early 1910s. liThe Monta Vista Story."
Cupertino-Monta Vista Courier, 24 April 1968, sec. 2, pgs. 17-19, Cupertino
Historical Museum, Subject drawer, Monta Vista file, Cupertino, California.
31. Current research efforts could not locate any primary or secondary sources
for this site and its former residents.
43
Bibliography
Connor, Ann W. and Young, Ethron. The Trianon Waits. Foothill Community
College: California History Center, 1973.
Jacobson, Yvonne. Passing Farms: Enduring Values, California's Santa Clara
Valley. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann, Inc., 1984.
Levy, Robert J. The West Side and How We Grew: A Geographic History of
Cupertino. Cupertino, CA: Bob and Louise Levy, 1991, 1994.
Levy, Robert J. The West Side and How We Grew: A Geographic History of
Cupertino. vol. 2. Cupertino, CA: Bob and Louise Levy, 1996.
McArthur, Seonaid L. and Fuller, David W., eds. Local History Studies. De Anza
College: California History Center, 1975. vol 19. Cupertino Chronicle.
Pace, Pauline. ed. Santa Oara County Heritage Resource Inventory. San Jose,
CA: 1975.
Sawyer, Eugene T. History of Santa Oara County California. Los Angeles, CA:
Historic Record Company, 1922.
44
PROTECTED POTENTIALIDSTORICAL SITES
AS LISTED IN GENERAL PLAN (FIGURE 2F)
Community Landmarks (as listed in the General Plan)
1. Downtown Monte Vista retail and commercial properties.
Historic Sites (as listed in the General Plan
1. Peronne Ranch Stone Cellar, now part of Ridge Vineyards.
2. Montebello School, 1892.
3. Picchetti Brothers Winery and Ranch.
4. Maryknoll Seminary.
5. De La Vega Tack House.
6. Enoch J. Parrish Tank Shop.
7. Replica Baer Blacksmith Shop.
8. Doyle Winery Site (foundation only).
9. Louis Stocklmeir Home.
10. Site of Elisha P. Stephens home, 1950, now part of Blackberry Farm.
11. Gazebo gingerbread trim, Memorial Park
12. Le Petit Trianon.
13. Union Church of Cupertino.
14. Cupertino De Oro Club.
15. St. Joseph Church.
Historic Resources (recommendations ofthe Historical Society
1. Stelling Tank House. End of festival, off Stelling.
2. Hammond House. Between Gate of Heaven Cemetery and the road to Permanente.
3. Tracy House. 10855 N. Stelling Road.
4. Lazaneo Tank House. 19985 Price at S. Blaney.
5. Russelhurst Country Club. 22273 Cupertino Road.
6. Will House. 10191 Vista Drive.
7. Baldissini-Adamo House. 7498 Prospect Road.
8. Miller House/buildings. 19340 Phil Lane.
9. Arch Wilson House. 10090 Crescent Road.
10. James Howard House. 10505 Miller Avenue.
11. Robert McCubbin House. 10505 Miller Avenue.
12. Schwartz House. 22410 Cupertino Avenue.
13. George Grimm House. 790 Blaney Avenue.
14. Palm Avenue (the street and trees). Palm Avenue at Foothill Blvd.
15. Engle Grocery. 21619 Stevens Creek Blvd.
16. Hazel Goldstone Variety Store.
Historical Ranking System
The committee used the Historic Ranking System for the evaluation of the properties. the
system is broken down into three major divisions, Architecture, History and
Environment. Each of the major criteria was further divided into three subcategories.
1. Architecture
The heritage resource being considered shall:
(i) Be significant as an example of a particular architectural style, type, or
convention.
(ii) Be significant as an example of a particular material or method of construction.
(iii)Be of a particular age in relationship to the periods of development in the area in
which it is situated.
(iv)Be designed or built by an architect or builder who has made a significant
contribution to the community or nation.
(v) Have an architectural quality of composition, detailing, and ornament measured,
in part in originality, quality as urban architecture, craftsmanship and uniqueness.
2. History
The heritage resource being considered shall:
(i) Be associated with the life or activities of a person, group, organization, or
institution that has made a significant contribution to the community, state or
nation.
(ii) Be associated with an event that has made a significant contribution to the
community, state or nation.
(iii)Be associated with, and effectively illustrative of broad pattern of cultural, social,
political, economic or industrial history, of the development of the city.
3. Environment
The heritage resource being considered shall:
(i) Contribute to the continuity or character of the street, neighborhood, or the area in
which it is situated.
(ii) Have a setting and/or landscaping which contributes to the character of the street,
neighborhood, or the street on which it is situated.
(iii)Be a landmark
The committee, in working with the rating system did modify the definition of "event"
because of the unique character of Cupertino and its development. The committee defined
event as : "Not necessarily a single occurrence, but the contribution to the social,
economic or political development of the community that became Cupertino".
Appendix A Historical Merit (secondary rating scale)
A determination of historic merit is based upon whether a structure meets the following
findings:
(a) Meets the criteria for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. or;
(b) Fulfills at least one of the following criteria:
(1) It has character, interest or value as part of the development of and or it
exemplification of, the cultural, educational, agricultural, social or historical,
architectural, artistic heritage of the City.
(2) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, State or national history.
(3) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of
architecture or construCtion, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous
material or craftsmanship.
(4) It is representative of a notable work of a building design or architect.
(5) It has a unique location or singular physical characteristic(s), whether manmade or
natural, representing an established or familiar visual feature of a neighborhood
community, or the City; or it has a relationship to any other landmark, and its
preservation is essential to the integrity of that landmark.
(6) It embodies or contributes to a unique natural setting or environment constituting
a distinct area or district within the City having special character or special
historical, architectural or aesthetic interest or value;
It is one of the few remaining examples in the City, region, state, or nation possessing
distinguishing characteristics of an architectural or historical type or specimen.
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m.
Thursday, September 11,1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, David Smith, Robert Keys and Hugh
Riddell
Absent: Denise Pan
Staff members: Bob Cowan, Deborah Ungo-McCormick
Audience: Mr. Monk, Mr. Stocklmeir, Mr. Westwood (arrived @ 7:00 p.m)
A. Minutes of September 4, 1997 meeting approved.
~
2. REpORT BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Mr. Stevens reported that as a result of the meeting to fmalize evaluations, some
minor changes in the architectural points were made. He provided draft copies of
overall evaluation summaries listed by rankings. He noted that there are 32
listings which include the commercial properties in Monta Vista. He added
column G (conditions of approval) and asterisks indicating special conditions or
points of interest, i.e. only the Perrone Cellar is listed but the building may have
merit; Maryknoll Seminary is not in the City. He agains stressed to all present
that this is NOT the final evaluation summary, it is still in draft form until it is
released as part of the report.
Mr. Stevens handed out a draft of the Introduction Section. He indicated that it is
succinct and to the point, almost in outline form, but is open for comments and
discussion about format. Mr. Cowan agreed that it is good to be brief but that
they should include some explanation of methodology and final rankings. Mr.
Riddell indicated that his summary section for the descriptors and individual
evaluations is in more of a narrative format. Smith indicated that he would like to
see the narrative format before making a final decision and that they should take
the time to make sure that report contains the information and is in the format
agreed upon by all members before forwarding to City Council. Mr. Cowan
indicated that the report is tentatively scheduled for the City Council meeting of
October 6th. Reports typically are forwarded one week prior to the meeting, so
they do have a few extra days to complete. He did note, however, that the agenda
is getting very full and that Council may not get to it if the meeting is very long.
The committee agreed that they do want to get it to staff as soon as but they
would all like the opportunity to review the final product before turning over the
report to staff. Mr. Smith commented that while the committee may feel that this
will be a complete package to the City Council, the Council may have additional
tasks or want additional information from them before considering it a final
document. The committee agreed to meet on Tuesday, September 15th in the
evening to finalize decisions on format and other details. Mr. Riddell indicated
that he will contact Ms. Pan to let her know of the meeting on Thursday.
D. AUDIENCE COMMENTS:
Mr. Stocklmeir asked ifthere will still be a meeting n~~t Thursday. Mr. Stevens
indicated that the committee will meet on Thursday, Sept. 18 at 6:30 p.m. and that
it is anticipated that it will be their last meeting.
Mr. Monk stated that he thought the report was supposed to go to Council on
Sept. 15th. Mr. Cowan indicated that the report is scheduled for review by
Council on the October 6th meeting.
5. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on
September 18, 1997 in Conference Room A at 6:30 p.m.
-!'
2
qlll!(n
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMIITEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m.
Thursday, August 28,1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, Denise Pan, David Smith and Hugh Riddell
Absent: Robert Keys (excused)
Staff members: Deborah Ungo-McCormick
Audie:1ce: Mr. Monk, Mr. Stocklmeir
A. Minutes of August 7, 1997 meeting approved.
2. REpORT BY COMMIITEE MEMBERS
Ms. Ungo-McCormick noted that while this is her official week as contract staff
planner in Cupertino, she has been contracted to continue working with the
Committee through the completion of the report. Mr. Stevens indicated that the
Committee appreciates that particularly for purposes of maintaining continuity.
.,r
A. Mr Stevens reported that the group has met on several occasions during the last 3 weeks
and that they completed the ranking of projects Environmental Section and Historic
Section, except for Mr. Smith's input.
Mr. Smith asked if pictures of the Stone Cellar. Mr. Stevens indicated that while Mr.
Keys was at the winery, he was not able to get access to the cellar so they are no photos
available. He has produced a CD Rohm of all other photos. Ms. Pan suggested that Mr.
Keys and Mr. Smith try one last time to get photos of the cellar. Mr. Smith indicated that
he would contact Mr. Keys to do so. Mr. Smith mentioned that Hammond House
pictures were provided by Staff as taken during a group visit to the site.
Mr. Riddell mdicated that he would like to also review the architectural ranking provided
by Mr. Smith since he was not present when that was completed. Mr. Stevens indicated
that he had the latest set of ranking cards and that he would forward them on to Mr.
Riddell..
B. The Committee discussed the proposed format of the report. It was agreed that the
report will be produced by the Committee and turned over to staff for packaging and
production. The Committee will provide a hard copy of the report with color
photographs for reproduction. Colored copies will be provided to the City Council. The
report will be transmitted with a cover memo by staff which would include a summary
of their recommendations. Ms. Ungo-McCormick reported that the report is scheduled
to be forwarded on the October 6, 1997 City Council meeting, but the report itself is still
due on September 15th, This will allow sufficient time to package and reproduce as well
as staff to produce cover memo. The Committee agreed by consensus that they will be
forwarding the rankings of the properties and provide descriptors in addition to
summarizing the processed used. The do not feel comfortable making an interpretation
of what is "compelling", the Council should do that. The rankings and back up
information should make strong cases for those properties that warrant consideration of
preservation efforts.
c. ASSIGNMENT OF TASKS:
Mr. Smith needs to add his scores in the environmental and historic sections. The
committee will meet off-site next Tuesday to complete evah,mtions. Ms Pan noted that if
they meet on Tuesday evening, she will not be at the Thursday evening meeting.
Mr. Riddell and Mr. Pan are working on individual site descriptors for the report and set
up of individual sheets.
Mr. Stevens is working on the Introduction and Summary of overall findings, rankings
~
D. AUDIENCE COMMENTS:
Mr. Stocklmeir questioned how the committee arrived at the environmental ranking for
his property and indicated that he wanted a direct response by next meeting. The
Committee indicated to him that their role that they have not completed the ev.aluations
and that the information he is requesting will be available at the time the report is
circulated. They have welcome property owners to the meetings because they feel that is
very valuable and that property owners have provided important information and/or
clarifications that may otherwise not be available, but ultimately the ranking on each
property has been developed by the Committee from a number of sources and based on a
common set of parameters established as a Committee.
Mr. Monk was concerned that he would not have sufficient time to and assimilate the
report prior to the City Council meeting and with any delays that would not allow the
issues of an ordinance to be finalized before a new Council is in place. Mr. Stevens
responded that the report will be available at the same time it is available to the Council.
If the Council determines that they need more time they can continue the item to a
subsequent meeting. The Committee also wants the process to be completed by
November, but any deviations from that schedule is out of their or staffs hands.
5. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on
September 4, 1997 in Conference Room A at 6:30 p.m.
2
eI1'i3/tll
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMIITEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m
Thursday, August 7, 1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, Denise Pan, Robert Keys and Hugh Riddell
Absent: David Smith (excused)
Staff members: Deborah Unge-McConnick (Mr. Cowan unable to attend as he was on
"fire alert" due to fire in Los Gatos Hills).
Audience: Mr. Westwood
A. Minutes of July 31, 1997 meeting approved.
ir
2. REpORT BY COMMIITEE MEMBERS
The Committee welcomed Mr. Riddell back from Fargo, N.D. He indicated he is very
pleased to be back and ready to assist with the project. He thanked Ms. Ungo-
McConnick for keeping him infonned by "e-mailing" the minutes of past meetings.
A. Mr Stevens handed out a copy of notes by Mr. Smith as supplement to his architectural
ratings.
B. Mr. Stevens handed out infonnation provided by Mr. Levy from his books and
bibliographies on buildings. Mr. Stevens asked Mr. Levy if he would complete an
evaluation summary sheet for each site based on infonnation available to date and his
own research, just to get a sense of how he might rate structures as a geographic
historian. Ms. Stevens provided the committee with a copy of Mr. Levy's Historical
Summary evaluation.
C. Mr. Stevens reported that he had some more infonnation of Sanborn Maps and that they
are available on microfilm files at UC Berkeley Library for 1920 and 1930. He provided
a contact number (510) 642-4940 and asked staff to inquire on availability and cost.
D. Mr. Stevens noted that the evaluation of properties includes three elements: historical,
architectural and environmental. While architectural is almost complete and historical is
in progress, the committee has not discussed the environmental component (contribution
to character of area/landscape, status as landmark, etc) as in Appendix A. He therefore
suggested that the committee meet as a working group on the weekend to try complete
this component of the evaluation. Ms. Pan asked that they also begin reviewing the
historical infonnation available from their research to date and in this way can begin to
detennine where there are gaps that need to be filled. Mr. Riddell suggested that they
begin with the environmental and try to get to historical as well, time permitting. If
necessary, they may need to meet a second time to complete both, perhaps in-lieu of the
next Thursday meeting. The committee agreed to meet on Sunday at 1 :00 p.m. at the
Coffee Society (Oaks Center) and would notify staff on Monday if there will be a regular
Thursday Meeting or not, based on progress made on Sunday.
E. Mr. Stevens submitted draft questions for future site visits based on those adopted last
meeting and added a fourth which provides owners with opportunity to add comments
that they might want added to evaluation. By consensus of the committee, the questions
were approved as submitted. Mr. Keys indicated that he would like to gain access to
Hammond House property but is reluctant to approach because the current renter is not
very friendly. Ms Ungo-McCormick indicated she would look into possibility of gaining
access since property is owned by the Diocese of San Jose and is a part of the site for
which the Diocese is currently processing a tentative subdivision map and planned
development application. Ms. Ungo-McCormick informed the committee that as part of
the application review process, the environmental impact report identified the Snyder-
Hammond house as having potential historical significance. The site where the Snyder-
Hammond house is located is part of the Diocese property to be dedicated to the County
Parks and Recreation Depamnent. The County staff has indicated that they have no
interest in preserving andlor maintaining the house, but the conditions of approval of the
project include a statement that provides a two year period during which the historical
significance can be evaluated and interested parties can explore methods for preservation
and maintenance.
F. Ms. Pan submitted here Notes on Secondary Sources to date. She noted that she still has
some sources to review and will provide follow-up report when she completes her
research. She noted that Mr. Levy's books are available at the Cupertino Library and
that. she will bring with her to group meeting on Sunday.
~
3. DEVELOP WORK PROGRAM
Mr. Stevens asked staff if the'Committee would be making presentation at a public hearing.
Ms. Unge-McCormick indicated that the item will be presented as a report to City Council at
a regular Council meeting but will likely not be a public hearing. The Council will then
decide if they wish to proceed with consideration of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and
will set a hearings for consideration of an ordinance. Ms. Unge-McCormick suggested that
the Committee begin thinking about what will go in the Report to Council. He asked staff if
there is a standards format. Ms. Un go-McCormick explained that the staff would include a
staff report/summary as a cover transmittal to the City Council which summarized process
and Committee recommendations. The report fonnat is at the discretion of the Committee
but should probably include typical components: Executive Summary, Table of Contents,
Introduction/Background (describing role of committee and process), individual site
descriptions with photographs and research info., site evaluation summaries and
recommendations. The Committee may wish to discuss the fonnat at their meeting on
Sunday and bring ideas with them.
5. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on August 14, 1997
in Conference Room A.
2
e (1 {en
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.rn
Thursday, July 31, 1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, Denise Pan, David Smith, Robert Keys
Absent: Hugh Riddell (excused)
Staff members: Bob Cowan, Deborah Ungo-McCormick
Audience: Mr. Monk, Mr. Stocklrneir
A. Minutes of July 24, 1997 meeting approved.
2. REpORT BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
He also noted for the record and benefit of those present at committee meetings that all
information shared and provided at these meetings should be considered preliminary. At
this point the committee is conducting research and discussing aspects of the research
process to be used for formulation of final report to Council in September. He cautioned
that information handed out at these meetings should not be considered fmal.
Or
A. Ms. Pan reviewed her memo dated July 24, 1997 which outlines results of her research
efforts at the Historical Society. She stressed that the committee needs to continue
"post-haste" with research of other available primary and secondary sources since the
information obtained from Historical Society records only touches on some of the
properties.
B. Mt:. _ Stevens handed out a draft worksheet/spreadsheet which summarizes criteria listed
in Appendix A.
C. Mr. Stevens handed out draft architectural summary spreadsheet which incorporated
latest rankings by Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith noted that he is still completing architectural
assessment and cautioned that work at this point is preliminary. He indicated that while
all sites have been visited (which required architectural visits) there is a question on the
location of the cellar at Ridge Winery.
D. Mr. Stevens provided copies of Cupertino Courier report on the history of grapevine
industry in Cupertino.
E. Mr. Stevens noted that he, Mr. Keys and Mr. Smith met last Monday, July 29 to discuss
site visit protocol. They came up with two draft questions to ask at site visits, if needed:
I) What is age ofbuilding(s) or any remodeling, additions to such? 2) Do you have any
knowledge of persons important to history of Cupertino? Ms. Pan asked Mr. Smith if he
foresees going back to any property. Mr. Smith indicated that all visits are complete,
although there may be a need to go back to Montgomery House site and as noted before
.,r
to Ridge Winery. Mr. Smith indicated that he will visit Winery this weekend and see if
he can get some information. Ms. Pan suggested. since the architectural visits appear to
be complete, questions during site visits should focus on historical. The Committee
unanimously adopted the following questions for use during any future visits: 1.) What
is age of original house and subsequent remodels? 2) Do you have historical evidence
on buildings and remodels to share with committee? 3) Do you know of anyone
historically significant associated with buildings or property?
F. Ms. Pan again stressed the need to move "post-haste" on the research component of this
project. The committee essentially only has the month of August to complete and meet
the goal of reporting back to Council in September. The information contained in
Historical Society files is primarily comprised of oral history reports that are for the
most part footnoted and they did not have information on all sites. There needs to be
additional research work completed of other primary and secondary sources. Mr. Cowan
concurred that the committee needs to proceed with review of research component to
begin to "wrap things up" and suggested they proceed with distribution of work as
recommended in Ms. Pan's memo. Mr. Stevens referred back to what he sees as main
objective as directed by Council: 1) Are siteslbuildings compelling cases for
preservation? 2) Exclude the "sites" that need no review (building involved) etc. 3)
Exclude the "sites" that no longer are the "historic building that was". He sees the
directive as building driven. Ms. Pan disagreed and indicated that it is too premature to
being the process of excluding sites since the research work has not been completed.
Mr. Smith and Mr. Cowan concurred that while the architectural component is almost
complete, the historical component needs to be weighed in before any decision is made
on status of sites. Ms. Pan referred to the checklist form from the State of California
which Mr. Stevens had provided to them earlier in the process. Question 20 refers to the
significance of properties: "Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance
(include dates, events, and persons associated with the site)". Mr. Cowan concurred that
historical significance needs to be factored in and in order to exclude properties, the
research must be completed to determine that there is no historical significance
associated with property. Historical figures, events are typically factors which help
determine level of significance. Mr. Stevens noted that there probably will be significant
discussion on this issue since there are differing opinions on what makes a sitelbuilding
worthy of preservation.
G. Mr. Cowan provided copy of information he was able to download on Sanborn Maps.
Apparently, there are no maps readily available on Cupertino or other Santa Clara Valley
cities through UCDavis to non-faculty, non-student population. Ms. Pan noted that she
knows UCBerkeley does have maps and are available.
3. DEVELOP WORK PROGRAM
Ms. Pan indicated that she needs assistance to complete research component since there are a
number of primary and mostly secondary sources that need to be researched and she is only
available weekends. Mr. Stevens indicated that he and Mr. Keys reviewed some of the
primary resources (scrapbooks) at the California History Museum and that he made copies of
McKibben and Parrish information and some related to specific buildings since at the time
he was focusing on buildings. Ms Pan asked if he could go back and research information on
famous or historically significant people that might be associated with the history of
Cupertino and Santa Clara Valley, and write down information or Xerox and provided
footnotes, sources. It is important to look into life and times of these people since they have
2
7 i~I/'l7
impact beyond a specific property or building and not only focus on information related to a
specific site. Mr. Stevens indicated he will go back to California History Museum to do so.
Mr. Keys indicated he is stilI in process of transferring photos to CD-Rohm format and
making black and white photos. He has already put over 35 hours into process and has not
completed. Mr. Smith is in process of completing his architectural survey work and will be
off for a couple of weeks. Ms. Pan indicated she wiII do the research of sources she listed in
her memo. Ms. Ungo-McCormick suggested that she may want to e-mail a message to Mr.
Riddell to find out when he is due back and if he can assist with the research once he gets
here.
4. ASSIGN TASKS
. Mr. Stevens will visit California History Museum to conduct historical research and
Ridge Winery to try to obtain information of location of cellar or obtain contact name.
. Mr. Keys wiII continue working on transferring files to CD format and making black &
white copies.
. Mr. Smith wiII complete preliminary architectural summary report (wiII be off for a
couple of weeks).
. Ms. Pan wiII conduct research of sources listed in her memo.
I,'
,r
5. OTHER COMMENTS:
Mr. Stocklmeir noted that the original foundation of the house on his property dates 1900' s
but that it was rebuilt in the 1950's. That should be reflected in rating of property shown in
checklist provided Mr. Steven's. Mr. Smith and Mr. Steven's again stressed that these are
all preliminary ratings and should not be considered as final. Part of the discussion to come
in preparing fmal ratings and report to Council wiII likely consider these factors. Mr.
Stocklmeir also commented that just because a person lived there doesn't make a building
historical and that there shouldn't be an automatic lin1e Ms. Pan indicated that the
committee has the role of viewing the general perspective and that events, people associated
with a structure may in fact add to significance of such. That is the importance of historical
research and she again referred him to the State Department Checklist (question 20).
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on August 7,
1997 j~ Conference Room A
3
~ 1'31111
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
Historic Research Committee
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m.
Thursday, July 24,1997
Minutes
1. Roll Call
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, David Smith, Robert Keys
Absent: Denise Pan, Hugh Riddell (excused)
Staff members: Bob Cowan
Audience: Mr. Stocklmeir (arrived 7:00 p.m.)
A. Minutes of July 17, 1997 meeting approved.
2. Report by Committee Members
A. Mr. Stevens complimented staff member Deborah Ungo-McCormick for her minutes in
terms of style, content, and thoroughness.
...
B. Ms. Pan's July 27th report regarding information gathered from the Cupertino Historical
Society. The report outlines the location of historical resources and suggests seven
additional sources for review. Her written suggestion was to assign materials to
committee members for research. Mr. Stevens suggested the committee review the
suggestion at the next meeting when more members will be present.
1. Construction Dates
Mr. Stevens transmitted additional information from the MetroScan reports which
identified construction dates for five additional sites. Mr. Stevens reiterated caution in
relying upon all the of information contained in the MetroScan reports, but did indicate
that'there is some comfort level regarding construction dates.
2. Sanborn Maps
Staff was asked to report on the Sanborn maps. Mr. Cowan indicated the Internet was
used to obtain information on Sanborn maps. Mr. Cowan concluded that the two best
repositories of the Sanborn maps was the Library at the university of California, Davis
and UC Berkeley. Chairman Stevens indicated he knew of a person who has a
connection with UC Davis and would do some additional research.
3. Homeowners Ranking List
Mr. Stevens indicated he misplaced a copy of the ranking system used by the
homeowners and will transmit that at the next meeting. He indicated that the ranking
system contains a suggestion that the architectural ranking be lowered if the house is
significantly modified or moved. All agreed that the homeowners perspective was
11 'lA-141
important and would be considered when the committee concludes it's evaluation stage
begins the ranking sites.
4. Additional committee reports
The Committee discussed the "old Monta Vista" downtown designated site and
concluded there is not much historical architecture or historical merit. The committee
suggested the downtown area not be evaluated.
Mr. Keys commented that there did appear to be a fairly good example of a water tank
on the property next to the Blue Pheasant Restaurant and it may have equal value as
other tanks listed on the official list. Mr. Smith also indicated that there are other sites
that may also receive merit. All members concluded that the task of the Committee
should be limited to the original 31 sites and that comments may be made in the final
report regarding other potentially historical sites.
5. Work Program
The Committee determined that it would be appropriate to have a working session next
Tuesday to discuss the development of a check-off list to aid in the site visits. It would
be important, for example, to make sure that the site visits result in information that is
consistent, provides a mechanism to indicate fairness to the property owners and to
solicit advise from various owners regarding the Commission's task and some of their
ideas.
,r
At this juncture, Mr. Smith provided an update regarding his architectural research.
Both Mr. Smith and Mr. ~eys conducted site visits and photographed sites. Specifically,
the most recent meetings mvolved the Baptist Church property on Miller A venue and the
Stocklmeir property. The pastor of the Baptist Church gave Mr. Smith a master site plan
which indicated that one house (Howard house) is located in the middle of the future
sanctuary. Mr. Smith estimated that the house is 100 to 120 years old but is in very poor
condition. The other historical structure on the site is the Robert McCubbin house which
was constructed around 100 years ago. It was moved from its previous location on
Stevens Creek Boulevard near the intersection of Sevens Creek and DeAnza Boulevards.
The building has been restored inside and outside. The church representative indicated
thant will be preserved. It appears to be a good example of a house built during that
time period. The De La Veaga tack house was evaluated and determined that it had been
substantially remodeled although the major architectural theme of the building has been
maintained. There is great evidence of faux architecture. The Russell Hurst Country
Club house at 22273 Cupertino Road appears to be an attractive house, but has been
substantially remodeled. There is some question as to whether the second story has been
recently added because it has a new appearance. It is unclear whether the Montgomery
House has architectural merit or that the house has historical merit. It was moved from
the Crossroads Center. and not all the house that existed on that site was moved.
Although the house is very well kept, there have been significant architectural changes.
The Schwartz house at 22410 Cupertino Road has a new clay tile roof, which diminishes
its architectural authenticity and historical merit. There is some indication that the
building was partially constructed by Mr. Parish who built several significant structures
within the community.
2.
1 I 14{Cn
Mr. Smith gave Mr. Stevens updated the architectural notes and 3 x 5 cards. The 3 x 5
cards have been updated since the last published version wilich was in a green color.
Mr. Smith indicated he had pretty much completed his architectural assignment,
although he has not had a chance to review the Montogmery House. He stated he could
benefit by interviewing approximately 2 to 3 other homeowners in order to obtain
comments and complete his notes. The cards will have a coding system involving "yes"
or "yes/no" depending whether, in his subjective opinion, that the houses have historical
merit. The assessment will be qualified by comments regarding the estimated cost of
refurbishing the buildings and will address questionable additions and to agree which
those additions diminish the architectural value.
The Committee discussed mechanics of obtaining colored copies of photographs. The
sub-committee will determine as to which colored version should be copied in order to
save costs. Mr. Smith indicated he will be on vacation August 16th, and perhaps one
additional week in September.
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for July
31, 1997.
g:iplanninglhistcommlmin 7 - 24
"
~
1 f141ttl
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m
Thursday, July 17, 1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, Denise Pan, David Smith, Robert Keys
Absent: Hugh Riddell (excused)
Staff members: Bob Cowan, Deborah Ungo-McConnick
Audience: Mr. Levy, Mr. Monk, Mr. Stocklmeir
A. Minutes of July 10, 1997 meeting approved.
~
2. REpORT BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
A. Ms. Pan indicated she has completed research at Historical Society and will be
producing a report that summarizes findings. Mr. Stevens asked what her impressions
where of the content and usefulness of infonnation found there. She commented that
research is not always productive. She was able to obtain infonnation on some properties
but not on all sites.
B. Mr. Stevens provided. copies of Metroscan property profiles for properties A - P. The
infonnation provided includes 2 dates: year built and the "EffYear BLT" data. He noted
that he removed infonnation which is not pertinent to this effurt as he is very sensitive to
respecting privacy of properties owners. This infonnation, however, is accessible to all
through Metroscan. Mr. Smith indicated that he will compare this infonnation against
his-architectural merit review and while he does not expect it to change the ratings, it is
very useful to have to complete the analysis.
C. Mr. Stevens asked if staff had any infonnation on Sanborn Maps. Mr. Cowan indicated
that he did not but was still researching. Ms. Pan indicated that she was able to ascertain
that the UC Berkeley libraiy has Sanborn Map and that copies are available at a cost of
$0.05 per page. She was told that SJS Library has them on order. Mr. Stevens suggested
that before incurring the expense that the committee should detennine if they have
infonnation critical to this study. Mr. Levy indicated that he has aerials photographs
taken at 10 year intervals beginning in 1939. He could make them available if needed to
help detennine location of buildings.
D. Mr. Smith provided the committee copies of his notes used in preparation of the ranking
cards he provided last week. He noted that there are approximately 5 -6 sites that he
needs to visit to complete his review and would like to detennine what is appropriate
protocol. Mrs. Stocklmeir and Monk in the audience were asked if as property owners
they might have problems if the committee needed to visit their sites more than once.
They both indicated that in general this would not be an issue with them but others may
be less receptive, particularly if they don't understand the p..ocess. Mr. Smith did not
anticipate needing to go more than once from an architectural standpoint. Ms. Pan noted
that from a historical research standpoint, she does not need to be included in the site
visits but would suggest bringing along questions that would help fill in some of the
gaps. Mr. Smith suggested that he and Mr. Keys could go together, particularly since
they may want to photograph some buildings. By consensus the committee agreed to
authorize Mr. Smith and Mr. Keys to contact the 5 - 6 property owners and schedule site
visits. Ms. Pan suggested that the following questions be asked from property owners
during site visits: are you original owner? did you know original owner? do you know of
major remodeling to original house or since you've owned it?
3. DEVELOP WORK PROGRAM
Mr. Stevens asked that all committee members present ideas or recommendations on what
the report to Council should include so that they can begin to determine where the holes are.
With this information research tasks can be assigned to fill in the gaps.
He also noted that at some point during consideration of the historic preservation ordinance a
group of property owners had put together recommend~d ranking criteria. He asked Mr.
Monk if it could be made available to the committee to add owners' perspective to the
process. Mr. Monk said that he would e-mail the information to Mr. Stevens.
~
4. ASSIGN TASKS
. Mr. Smith and Mr. Key will begin process of contacting property owners and
scheduling site visits
. Ms. Pan will prepare report on Historic Society files research effort
. All will review documentation provided by Mr. Smith and will bring back
recommendations on how to proceed with preparation of report to City Council
5. OTHER COMMENTS:
Mr. Cowan explained that due to an notlcmg error, the interim emergency demolition
ordinance has expired and can no longer be extended. In order to provide for protection of
listed properties from potential demolition before a preservation ordinance is adopted, a
regular prdinance will be brought before the Council next Monday. The ordinance reads like
the interim ordinance and includes a sunset clause as well.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on July 24, 1997
in Conference Room A
2
,Ill j 11
HISTORICAL COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES - JULY 10, 1997
1. ROLL CALL
The meeting convened at 6:28 p.m. all members were present except for Hugh Riddell.
Guests present were Mr. Levy, Mr. Monk, Mr. Stocklmeir, and (owner of Montgomery
House)
Staff members present: Bob Cowan
I.A. The minutes of July 3, 1997 were approved with the correction that the first bullet
under 1 b should eliminate St. Joseph's. It should read ...the tal~ of three churches, union
church. The second correction should change the word phonograph to photograph on line
6 of the first paragraph on page 2.
2. REPORT BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Architectural Review Status:
.,..
Chairman Stevens distributed updated comments from Mr. Smith regarding the
architectural index cards. (Photo-copied to green cards). Chairman Stevens handed out
three matrixes defining a preliminary ranking system based on Mr. Smith's work. The
ranking system is based upon the staffs Appendix A describing numerical values for
architectural merit and by using appendix A in the ordinance. Member Smith described
the preliminary ranking system indicating that not all structures have been evaluated as
yet and that obviously that sites without building would have a rating of zero. Chairman
Stevens reiterated that this is a preliminary presentation.
Report from Mr. Kevs. Mr. Key produced cards containing notes regarding St. Josephs
and six sites. The report was derived from information from the historical society at
Quinlan Center. The information indicated that the property located at 7495 Prospect
Road may-have been mislabeled. David Smith will evaluate the correctly addressed
house and update his assessment.
Denise Pan indicated that she is still working with the Historical Society at the Quinlan
Center and has made special arrangements with Ethel Warren and made special
arrangements to utilize the research capabilities on Saturdays. Based on Denise's
suggestion, all agreed to allow Denise to conduct the research at the Quinlan Center
inasmuch as the center is quite protective in terms of how information is disseminated
and who has the ability to access the files. The historical society's concern is to protect
the materials.
Construction Dates: Chairman Stevens discussed progress regarding the construction
dates. The assessors information does contain information, but the assessor charges $3
for each inquiry. Chairman Stevens is going to ask a Realtor for assessor's information
1\ \0 \Ci1
utilizing a different source. The group then discussed the potential for utilizing Sandborn
maps to obtain information. All agreed that would be a great source, however the
Cupertino library does not have the Sandborn maps for the Cupertino area. All parties
agreed that it would be important to do independent research to determine the
accessibility of Sandborn maps.
During this discussion there was clarification as to the reimbursement of fees and staff
indicated that costs generated in the context of research for this committee would be
reimbursed and to contact Yvonne Kelley for reimbursement.
3. DEVELOPMENT OF WORK PROGRAM
Denise reiterated the need for a data collection methodology f01 research and
establishment of special reports. All agreed to use a common method of tracking
information and that the preparation of narratives for each site which would be divided
among the members. Once the narratives are prepared, then the evaluation of the
narratives would be done as a group.
4. TASK ASSIGNMENT
1. Sandborn maps - all parties should research availability of Sandborn maps
2. Staffwill call the Sandborn map company to determine the cost of obtaining CD
ROM
~
Final Comments: None of the individual members or staffhad final comments.
Chairman Stevens asked members of the audience if they had questions. Mr. Stocklmeir
asked how Mr. Smith used the ranking system. Chairman Stevens described the ranking
used in Appendix A of the staff present material and explained that a narrative would be
prepared for later versions to explain the methodology. The preliminary information is
very rough. Mr. Monk asked how the committee will distinguish between hearsay
information from neighbors and other folks versus facts. The committee indicated that it
recognized this problem and will do the best it can in terms of trying to differentiate
between fact for each property.
5. The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 to the meeting of July 17.
glplanninglhistcomm/7\ Omin
t
lito [cn
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m.
Thursday, July 3, 1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present Committee members: Jeny Stevens, Denise Pan, David Smith, Robert Keys
Hugh Riddell (absent - excused).
Staff members: Deborah Ungo-McCormick.
A. Minutes of June 17, 1997 meeting- name correction noted on Page 2 (Mr. Smith not Mr. Davis).
Minutes approved unanimously with correction noted.
B. Ms. Pan introduced Mr. Robert Levy whom she met at the Historical Society offices. Mr.
Levy is a geographical historian and introduced himself as a reporter of history of
Cupertino, reporting on how land uses have changed over the years. He has written 2 books
(The West Side and How We Grew: a geographic history of Cupertino) both of which have
information on most of the site being reviewed by the Committee. He offered his
assistance in the research process. Mr. Levy reviewed other bibliographical and historical
resources with the Committee:
. A tale of 3 Churches ~ - ~__ Union Churches)
. The Valley of Santa Clara Historic Buildings (1720-1920) and Old Santa Clara Valley by Phyllis
Filiberti Butler
. Historic Spots in California by Douglas E. Klye
. Water in Santa Clara Valley, a History
,r
Mr. Levy also referred to a survey of tanks and towers in the Bay Area by Girls Scouts compiled
during the bicentennial year and finally catalogued by him in his second book. He indicated that
these resources are available at most area libraries. He noted that a copy of each of his books has
been made available to the City's Public Relations Officer.
2. REpORT BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
A. Mr. Keys informed the Committee that he has taken photographs of sites if visible from public
right:.of-way to augment what they already have. There are sites that are not accessible without
going onto private property. He asked when that could happen. Staff reported that the letters to
property owners went out on June 30, 1997 but that the Committee still needs to develop
protocol on how to contact owners prior to visits. Mr. Stevens indicated protocol should be
developed at a subsequent meeting once they have established priority sites and which actually
need visits.
B. Mr. Stevens provided the Committee with copies of a booklet entitled: History of the Cupertino
De Oro Club - 1921 - 1980. He noted that it is written from the perspective of the female
members of the Club and that they anticipate updating it to the year 2000 in the near future.
C. Mr. Stevens informed the Committee that Ms. Pan made contact with Lisa Christiansen,
Librarian at the California History Center in De Anza College, and she will give special
dispensation to the Committee for access to the Center, upon request. She will, however, be on
vacation for a few weeks this summer (July) so Committee members should consider this in
scheduling research time. Mr. Stevens thanked Ms. Pan for her efforts and noted that he and Mr.
Keys had been there on Monday and Tuesday to review files and boxes of information. They
provided the Committee copies of biographies of Mr. Robert McCubbin and Mr. Enoch J.
Parrish as well as excerpts from other documents unique to the Center that contained information
related to sites under review by the Committee. There are a box which contains notes of
h=J1p,e~~~ Karl Friedricks, a SJ Mecury News correspondent; student reports; index of
~~QgFaf'h3 which unfortunately are not catalogued (but some have citations of buildings), and
other documents related to physical changes in Cupertino from vineyards to ag lands to where
we are today.
D. Staff reported that identification of public, private & quasi-public is being completed and should
be available at next meeting. Some sites have been difficult to locate and may need further
investigation.
E. Mr. Smith indicated that he has completed his first review of site from an architectural merit
perspective based on photos available and a windshield survey of sites and has prepared cards on
all but 5. Those not listed are because he was not able to locate or were not accessible without
entering private property. He still needs to review against_the Historical Ranking System
discussed at the last meeting to complete his assessment. He gave a brief summary of his
preliminary review but noted that this needs to be augmented by research and only then can the
really prioritize. There are sites that are very obvious in lack of architectural-historical merit
(i.e. St. Joseph's Church is not original building or site - the existing building was built in
1950's) and he has noted as such. He provided copies of preliminary notes to the Committee but
again stressed the need to do research on sites to compliment his assessment. While some site
may not have architectural merit, the may still have historical merit.
F. Mr. Stevens indicated that he had prepared a locator map based on best available information on
31 sites using the Chamber of Commerce maps and would be happy to make one for Committee
members as needed.
G. Ms. Pan stressed the need to continue to due research during July, particularly during available
weekends. Other Committee members should review different historical resources while Mr.
Smith is completing his architectural merit review. Ms. Pan recommended that she, Mr. Keys
and Mr. Stevens continue to visit research facilities to determine what is available. It is also
~ important that the write down where information is obtained and any information available on
the source (title of document, date, location of source, etc.) and then report back with written
information to Committee so that every member is on "the same page". This can be in form of
photocopies (write source, etc. on page), handwritten notes or whatever works for each member.
3. AsSIGN TASKS
The following assignment where made and Committee Members will report back in writing at
next meeting.
. Ms. Pan will visit Historical Society
. Mr. Keys will visit Cupertino Library - Mr. Levy volunteered to assist him there.
. Mr. Smith will continue architectural merit review
. Mr. Stevens will prepare site locator maps for all Committee members and will review
preliminary information presented by Mr. Smith.
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS:
Mr. Levy suggested that before they finish their work. the Committee should consider preparing
a video recording of sites because they will never be as they are now. Mr. Stevens concurred and
noted that the City has an excellent video department that may help in this process.
5. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on July 10, 1997 in
Conference Room A.
:2
11 ~ltll
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Conference Room A, 6:30 p.m
Thursday, June 26, 1997
MINUTES
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, Denise Pan, Hugh Riddell, David Smith,
Robert Keys
Staff members: Deborah Ungo-McCormick
A. Minutes of June 17, 1997 meeting- date correction noted (should read June 17 not
June 11) and Mr. Riddell's e-mail address should also be corrected:
hjriddell.@ao1.com. Minutes approved as corrected.
Ms. Pan indicated that she received agenda and minutes via e-mail and does not
need to receive hard copy as well; Mr. Stevens was not able to open attachment;
Mr. Riddell did not receive (via e-mail) because of incorrect address.
~
2. REpORT BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
A. Mr. Stevens provided a copy of the De Oro Club Historic Report and Xerox of
additional photos of the Cupertino De Ora Club. This document is on record with
the City as an official historical report.
B. Mr. Stevens provided Committee members and staff a copy each of the Tour of
H!~torical Santa Clara booklet.
C. All members except Mr. Davis have viewed the tape of February 18, 1997 City
Council Meeting. Mr. Davis will set up appointment with Video Department at
City Hall to view. Mr. Stevens noted that a copy of minutes from that meeting
were included in the May 14, 1997 Staff Memorandum.
D. Mr. Riddell provided a written and verbal summary of his assessment of sites to
be reviewed based on his review of information packet from Historical Society
and a windshield survey of sites. He indicated he did not attempt to contact
property owners or enter private property. As point of clarification, he noted that
the Wilson House is also referred to as the Montgomery House. Mr. Stocklmeir
provided some historical context indicating that since the house had been moved
to its present location to his recollection it has been called the Montgomery
House. The Committee unanimously voted to refer to it as the Montgomery House
during the course of this study. Mr. Riddell also provided a locator map of sites
~
and Mr. Keys presented new photographs of public sites. They had questions
regarding the ownership of certain parcels. Staff will research ownership type
(public, private, quasi-public) and provide report back to Committee. Some
discussion was had regarding properties where original buildings are no longer in
existence or integrity of building is in question. Perhaps a plaque is more
appropriate than a preservation. Ms. Pan expressed concern with this concept; it
is important to keep in mind historical context of the property. She also noted that
at this point in the process they need to evaluate whether or not additional
information is required to make a recommendation on status of potential historical
site or building, without making judgments. Mr. Riddell noted that while he will
be in Fargo he is accessible via e-mail and will assist in whatever way he is able
to (i.e. research via internet, review info., etc.). _
E. Mr. Stevens informed the Committee that on his visit to the California History
Center at De Anza College, he was told that the Center is closed during the
summer and will reopen in September. Mr. Keys will follow-up with a contact at
the De Anza to see if there is a possibility to gain access during July/August; Ms
Pan will access Web page; staffwill follow-up to see if there is a City contact.
F. Mr. Stevens asked on status of letter to property owners. Ms Ungo-McCormick
informed him that letter will go out early next week.
G. Mr. Stevens asked other Committee Members to report on status of Historical
Society Files. Ms. Pan indicated that these files are lacking in citations, dates and
some errors (as confirmed by Mr. Stocklmeir's comments at the last meeting).
Therefore, the Committee should not rely too much on them for accuracy and
need to do own follow-up work. Mr. Ke~ c~~urred. He is interested in
completing a drive-through as well. Mr. ~ indicated that he is mid-way
through reviewing against Appendix A and B with a focus on architectural merit.
3. DEVELOP WORK PROGRAM
The Committee unanimously agreed to use the "Historical Ranking System" provided
by Ms. Bjurrnan in the Draft Ordinance No. 1726 and the Historic Resources
Inventory Form- State of California in reviewing sites and buildings. The Committee
concurred that they are relying on Mr. Davis' expertise in the area of architectural
merit.
4. ASSIGN TASKS
Committee members will complete review of photographs and information included
in Historical Society files, limited to properties listed in Appendix A, and will report
back with recommendations on how to proceed distribution of tasks. Staff suggested
that they should rank by priority since some site and/or buildings are either already
covered by other preservation mechanism (i.e. on National or State Registry) or
outside city jurisdiction (County, De Anza College, etc.). This will help the
Committee identify where to focus immediate research efforts. Ms. Pan concurred
and suggested they rank under two categories: Public and Private and then private-
residence. private-other. Public sites/buildings should be considered high priority if
in danger of being demolished within 5 years. Staff clarified that the demolition
2
(p [Z (p{til
ordinance is only a temporary holding measure only valid until such time as City
Council determines how to proceed on designation of sites and whether or not to
adopt a local ordinance. Ms. Pan indicated that for purposes of this review, it should
not be considered a permanent local preservation mechanism. If possible, the
Committee members should prioritize sites before going out to view sites.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS:
Mr. Monk again referred to the February 18, 1997 meeting. Mr. Stevens noted that
members have or are in process of viewing video. Mr. Monk noted that the City
Council wanted sites reviewed not only in context of Cupeitino history, but also of
area.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8: 1 0 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on July 3,
1997 in Conference Room A
~
3
~ /1.b Jt{1
CITY OF CUPERTINO
1030 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
HISTORIC RESEARCH COMMITTEE
CornereFlce Room .\.,8:09 p.m. City Manager's Office
Tuesday, June 17, 1997
MINUTES
1. Roll Call
Present:
Committee members: Jerry Stevens, Denise Pan, Hugh Riddell, David Smith,
Robert Keys
Staff members: Bob Cowan, Deborah Uugo-McCormick
....
2. Follow-up items from June 11, 1997 meeting
. Minutes of June 11, 1997 meeting- adopted with minor correction: Mrs. Smith
and Stevens to visit Historical Society office on Thursday, not Friday.
. Mr. Riddell informed Committee chair that he will be absent during the month
of July to participate in the reconstruction efforts of school facilities in Fargo,
North Dakota. 1bis was not anticipated when he applied to become a member
of this Committee. The Committee concurred that Mr. Riddell's expertise is of
great value to this effort and will continue to require his assistance during
August and September. In addition, he will be accessible via e-mail during his
absence in July.
. Mr. Stevens and Mr. Smith presented written synopsis of and reported on visit
to Historical Society on Thursday, June 12, 1997. Staff provided black & white
Xerox copies of photographs to each member of Committee. Apparently, a
colored copy version of these photographs was provided to the City early in the
year but has been misplaced or lost. Staff will have a new colored version made
for use by the Committee.
. Ms. Pan presented suggested methodology of research methods. She stressed
the importance of keeping good notes and providing citations in report.
. Committee members discussed recommendations on how to proceed with work
program. Mr. Riddell suggested first adopting criteria for evaluation. Ms. Pan
concurred but added that research methods are critical to be able to back up
future recommendations. Mr. Smith added that as the architect, he would be
best able to review architectural merits of building and not historical
information. Mr Stevens reviewed roles and responsibilities listed in staff
memo of May 14, 1997 as charter of committee. Items 1 and 2 are main
objectives, others are guidelines and would like to add item 7 - make
(, in JCl, 7
recommendations to City Council. Staff noted that this is expected of the
Committee.
3. Develop work program
Committee adopted Criteria listed in Appendix B as interim guideline for review of
potential buildings and sites and Appendix A as list of buildings and sites to be
reviewed by Committee.
4. Assign tasks
Committee members will review photographs and information included in Historical
Society files, limited to properties listed in Appendix A, and will report back with
recommendations on how to proceed distribution of tasks a~ next meeting. Mr Keys
and Mr. Riddell will review photographs to determine where additional photographs
need to be taken. .
5. Other items:
Mr. Stevens provided list of committee members and minor additions/ corrections
were made by other members.
Staff provided draft letter to property owners for review by committee. Mr. Cowan
indicated that letter should stress the fact that allowing committee to enter site and
cooperation is strictly voluntary. Committee members want to ensure that the
message gets across and that letters go out to all property owners as soon as possible.
Committee deferred revising letter to Mr. Cowan as deemed appropriate.
~
6. Audience comments:
Mr. Stocklmeir noted that information included in Historical Society packet regarding
his property is incorrect. The house underwent significant modifications in the
1950's and thus should not be listed as Victorian. Ms Pan asked if he would share
photographs of original home. He indicated he may consider, he is not sure yet.
Mr. Johnsen suggested reviewing video of City Council public hearing as
recommended by Mr. Monk. at last meeting. Mr. Cowan indicated that staff will
provide Committee with a copy of the video to be circulated among members.
7. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Next regular meeting is scheduled on June
26, 1997 in Conference Room A
1..
Cf>1 n jcn
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3300
ACTION ~lINUTES
Historic Research Committee
Conference Room A, 6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, June 11, 1997
Introductions:
Bob Cowan, Community Development Director, introduced himself and Deborah Ungo-
McCormick, contract staff planner assigned as support to Committee during Michelle
Bjurman's absence through August 1, 1997. Based on anticipated timeline, it is expected
that the research effort will be completed by end of August and a report with
recommendations will be forwarded to City Council in SeptemQ.<=r. A copy of the adopted
historic demolition ordinance was provided to committee members and staff noted the
minor changes made to the list of potential site during City Council meeting: added gazebo
to Site 11 and all other buildings at McClellan Park to Site 7.
Mr. Cowan provided background on the preparation of the proposed historic preservation
ordinance and subsequent creation of the Historic Research Committee. It is expected that
this committee will be a self-motivated, self-run working committee. Because staff
resources are limit~ staff will attend some of the meetings (depending on frequency) and
will assist with coordination, mailings and production effons. Action minutes will be taken
when staff is available, but the committee will need to take their own when not available.
*
Committee members introduced themselves and provided brief summary and background
and experience related this appointment Jerry Stevens, Hugh Riddell, David Smith, Bob
Keys and Denise Pan.
Election of Chairperson:
By consensus Jerry Stevens was elected interim chairperson.
Meeting Schedule:
By consensus the committee agreed to meeting initially on a weekly basis. Regular meeting
day and time will be Thursdays at 6:30 p.m., except next week when the meeting will be
on Tuesday, June 17 at 6:30 p.m. Staff will confinn which room is available since there are
. many standing committee meetings in City Hall.
Review Goals & Objectives:
Staff reviewed goals and objectives as defined by City Council. Mr. Stevens asked that the
individual committee members review these and be ready to discuss at the next meeting.
Mr. Riddell commented that he felt the city council directive is clear as defined in staff
memo and at city council meetings. Ms Pan stressed the importance of informing property
owners prior to any future site visits.
Develop Work program:
Committee members concurred that before they can develop a work program. they need to
understand what infonnation has been compiled and is available including that prepared by
the Cupertino Historical Society. In addition, they agreed that it is important to notify
property owners prior to visiting sites. A letter should go out shortly to notify property
owners of potential future visits.
Audience comments:
Mr. Stevens invited members from the audience to introduce themselves and comment on
their interest in this effort. Clarence Johnsen, George Monk, Alan Stocklmeir, Michael
Ure, property owners, generally expressed concern with placing private properties on list
and the potential loss of value to their propeny. Mr. Monk concurred with the roles and
responsibilies outlined in the staff memo. Sharon Blaine from the Cupertino Historical
Society indicated that they have compiled information on most of the properties on the list
including addresses, photographs and historical information and invited the committee to
make use of that information.
Next meeting agenda:
The following items will be brought back to the next meeting:
.
Mr. Stevens and Mr. Smith will visit the Historical Society offices on Friday to review
available information and will report back on Tuesday.
Ms. Pan will prepare a proposed research methodology outline for review by the
committee.
Committee members will bring with them recommendations on how to proceed with
work program and assignment of tasks (Le. by area of expertise).
Staff will provide action minutes to committee prior to next meeting.
Staff will provide a list of committee members with names and addresses.
Staff will prepare a draft letter to property owners for review by the committee at next
meeting.
.
.
.
.
.
Adjournment:
The committee adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
.,r
t
(, [I \ I etl