Loading...
CC 12-07-98 MINUTES Cupertino City Council Special Meeting Monday, December 7, 1998 ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Wally Dean, Vice-Mayor John Statton, and Council members Don Burnett and Michael Chang. Council members absent: Sandra James. CLOSED SESSION At 6:15 p.m. Council convened in closed session regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). P.S.S. Associates vs. the City of Cupertino. At 6:45 p.m. the closed session ended and Council reconvened in open session. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:46 p.m. Mayor Dean called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Kilian said that Council directed the attorney to proceed along the lines discussed in closed session regarding pending litigation. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Wally Dean, Vice-Mayor John Statton, and Council members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Sandra James. Council members absent: None. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS Ms. Roberta Holliman, Chairperson of the Citizens of Cupertino Cross-Cultural Consortium (5Cs) and Mayor Dean presented an award to Dan Pulcrano, Metro Newspapers, and Maggie Benson and staff, Cupertino Courier, for responsible journalism and fostering cultural understanding, particularly their 3-part story on harmony. Ms. Sharon Huntsman, representing Joint Venture Silicon Valley, requested that Council adopt a resolution of commitment for the broad vision in Silicon Valley 2010 and for the strategic directions for the future of this region. The purpose of this document was to craft a shared vision of how the communities could grow together, with goals that could be measured quantitatively on an annual basis. She reviewed the methods in which community input was gathered and the goals were identified. The final result was a vision for Silicon Valley that has 17 measurable goals. She highlighted the strategic directions that Council is asked to support in their resolution of commitment, which is item No. 7 on this agenda. The strategic directions are: (1) The innovative economy; (2) A livable environment; (3) An inclusive society; and (4) Regional stewardship. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page 2 POSTPONEMENTS - None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS The City Attorney said that there was a letter received from Mr. Mario Guzman for the continuance of item No. 19 ( weed abatement). One option is to adopt a general resolution tonight, with the exception of his property, and consider Mr. Guzman's request at a later time. Mr. John Luth, hazardous vegetation division of the Santa Clara County Fire Marshal's Office, requested that the general resolution be passed tonight with the exception of Mr. Gu~uan's property, since inspections for spraying have already begun. He had spoken with Mr. Guzman on the phone and thought the problem had been resolved, but just found out today that Mr. Guzman was requesting a continuance. This item was discussed in more detail when Council reached that item on the agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None. CONSENT CALENDAR James moved to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as presented, with the exception of item Nos. 6 and 7. Statton seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 1. Accounts payable - November 13, 1998. Resolution No. 98-285. 2. Accounts payable - November 20, 1998. Resolution No. 98-286. 3. Accounts payable - November 25, 1998. Resolution No. 98-287. 4. Payroll - November 13, 1998. Resolution No. 98-288. 5. Payroll - November 25, 1998. Resolution No. 98-289. 8. Monthly Treasurer's and Budget Report- October 1998. 9. Assistant City Attorney classification and compensation. Resolution No. 98-291. 10. Blackberry Faire Picnic Grounds weekends and holidays fee increase for the 1999 season, amending Resolution No. 98-138, Schedule F (page 33). Resolution No. 98- 301. 11. Deferred eompensatiun plan and trust/custodial document. Resolution No. 98-292. December 7, 1998 Cupertino Cit Council Page 12. Symantec Corporation - Modification of City Council Resolution No. 98-162 regarding defe,,~ent of off-site improvement requirements. Resolution No. 98-293. 13. Symantec Corporation - Modification of City Council Resolution 98-162 accepting a written agreement from Symantec to enter into a shared sales tax agreement or make an additional financial contribution for completion of the "comer park" at the intersection of De Anza Blvd. and Stevens Creek Blvd. Resolution No. 98-294 14. Acceptance of municipal improvements: .lands of Klein, 10187 Stonydale Road (Creston). 15. Allocate up to $3,500 for graphic artist services for re-design of city logo on business cards and stationery. 16. Contract change order No. 1 with Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction for work on the Stevens Canyon Road stom~ drain and retaining walls, Project 98-110. Resolution 98-302. Vote Councilmembers Ayes: Burnett, Chang, Dean, James, and Statton - Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstain: None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 6. Minutes of the November 16 regular meeting and the November 19 regular adjourned meeting. James moved to correct the minutes of November 16 as follows: Page 7, paragraph 2, the first sentence should read "Chang said that Council had always been aware that Symantec would not occupy the entire building." Burner seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 7. A resolution of commitment, Silicon Valley 2010: A Regional Framework for Growing Together. Resolution No. 98-290. Burnett said his reason for pulling this from the Consent Calendar was to highlight the fact that, after the presentation under ceremonial matters, Council was adopting a resolution of commitment as requested by Joint Venture Silicon Valley. Bumett moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-290. James seconded and the motion carried 5-0. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page PUBLIC HEARINGS 17. Consideration of amendments to General Plan policies 2-33 and 6-17 regarding discouraging electronic security gates, 2-GPA-98, 28 -EA-98. Amending the fence ordinance eitywide, Municipal Code Section 16.28. Consideration of amendment to Chapter 16.28 regarding prohibition of security gates in non-single family residential parcels Environmental detemfinafion: Categorically Exempt. A. First reading of Ordinance No. 1802: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 16.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Electronic Security Gates." Cowan said this item was prompted by a decision of Council from last July involving a request from Citation Homes to approve the gate at their facility at the coroer of Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard. At that time the request was denied, and staff was requested to study the general plan policy, which basically discourages security gates. Slaffhas reviewed those policies, and communicated with the Sheriffs department to deteLtLtine better criteria for approving or denying gates. Staff recommends the amendment of the Planning Commission recommendation to clarify the Commission's intent with regard to single-family homes and mid-range residential units. Cowan reviewed the criteria recommended for approving security gates as - shown in the staffreport. Mayor Dean opened the public hearing. There were no speakers and the public hearing was closed. Burnett said that he was in favor of the recommendation, with the exception of the first bullet regarding units being "... visible and easily accessible from a major thoroughfare and constitutes a potential opportunity for crime." He felt that statement was too broad. The potential oppommity for crime is ubiquitous in American life but this is a very low crime community. The crime problems in Cupertino which do exist have not centered on apartments but have been in single-family residential homes. Allowing gates at this location would go against his concept of an inclusive community. It seems the opportunity for mechanical failure is at least as high as the potential for crime. Kilian clarified that the staffs recommendation was to delete the requirement of"25 units or more" and have it applied to all attached multi-family dwellings. Bumett agreed and said that the single-family portion of this should be sent back to the Planning Commission. Statton said he agreed with Bumett's comments. The more we gate ourselves the less safe we feel, and he feared an onslaught of gating which he didn't wish to see in this community. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page 5 James disagreed, and said the market should drive the need for gated communities. She did not feel it denotes an unsafe community any more than the neighborhood watch signs do. Also, the Sheriffs Office supports the criteria about gates being appropriate in projects that are visible and easily accessible from a major thoroughfare. Chang said the old general plan policy was to discourage security gates and right now the low-level of crime in this community does not call for a change in that policy. He agreed with the suggestion to delete the criteria about projects that are visible and easily accessible from a major thoroughfare. He was also concerned about access for emergency vehicles. Burner moved to approve a Negative Declaration. Statton seconded and the motion carried 4-1 with James voting no. Burner moved to approve the staff's recommendation approving Res. 98-295 with the modification that the criteria for "visible and easily accessible from a major thoroughfare" be deleted; and that the issue regarding single family zones be referred back to the Planning Commission for further review. Statton seconded and the motion carried 4-1 with James voting no. - The City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 1802. Bumett moved and James seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried 4-1 with James voting no. 18. Electric gate at apartments, Citation Homes Central, 8-U-94 (M), located at De Anza Boulevard & Via Paviso, APNs: 316-01-212 through 316-01-220. Reconsideration of an application to install an electrical gate at an apartment entrance. Environmental determination: Categorically Exempt. The item is recommended for approval. Mr. Frank Nicoletti, attorney for Citation Homes, said it was his belief that this project was proceeding under the old general plan, and Council had already held that hearing, so this is not their application at this time. He said that Council has adopted a provision that says if there is a state or federal funding requirement a gate is permitted, and that is purely arbitrary. The applicant has made no application to have this item put back on the calendar, and the Council is now trying to put themselves into compliance with a previous decision. Charles Kilian, City Attorney, said that the basis of the lawsuit presented by the applicant was the unavailability of findings. When that happens the court sends it back to council for further findings. This is a re-hearing, which is authorized under the city's ordinances, which can consider making fore,al findings based upon evidence _ which was previously presented. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City CouncilPage 6 Mr. Chung Pong Ng, representing Citation Homes, said that this development is the only one in the immediate area that is not fully gated, and there have been individuals who indicate they will not live at this development because it does not have a gate. This arbitrary decision of council puts this project at a competitive disadvantage. Right now they have a 10% vacancy rate, which is higher than the current market. Leasing agents always ask if the project is gated. Burnett moved to deny the application and make the following findings based on the previous general plan: (1) Installing these gates would isolate this development from the rest of the community, since it is now almost completely walled off; there is agate on the east end and this gate would complete the cutting offofthis development from the community, which is not in keeping with the spirit of the general plan for an open and inclusive community; and (2) General plan item 6-17 indicates that gates should be discouraged when they act as a barrier to emergency service personnel. There is sometimes queing in front of gates that could make emergency access more difficult, and gates are a mechanical system which are subject to failure in times of catastrophe, such as an earthquake. Statton seconded the motion. James objected to denying gates at this project when they have already been granted at developments across the street, around the corner, etc. Also, both the Sheriff's - Department and Fire Department have indicated these gates would not be a problem in te~ms of emergency access. Dean said that this gate request is merely following the criteria that was set under the old general plan. Chang said that as he thinks more about this request, the language in the old general plan was not clear about discouraging gates, and it is because of that Council is discussing this amendment. The amendment to the general plan will make it very clear what is and is not acceptable. Because of the lack of clarity and lack of consistency in granting gates to other nearby apartments, he would support grandfathering this request for gates under the old plan. Dean called for the vote on the motion to deny 8-U-94 (M). The motion failed 3-2 with Dean, James and Chang voting no. James moved to approve 8-U-94 (M) based upon the criteria of the previous general plan and with the conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. Chang seconded, and the motion carried 3-2, with Burnett and Statton voting no. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page 7 19. Ordering abatement of public nuisance (weed abatement) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 98-270. Resolution No. 98-296. Discussion of this item began under Written Communications", and continued at this time. City Attomey Kilian refen'ed to a letter submitted by Mr. Marlo Guzman and said that he had spoken to him before the meeting. The letter raises some issues of general concemed about the weed abatement program that Council may wish to address. James moved to order abatement of the public nuisance (weeds) and adopt Resolution No. 98-296, with the exception of Mr. Marlo Guzman's property, and direct staffto prepare a report regarding the concerns stated in Mr. Guzman's letter. Statton seconded and the motion carried 5-0. James moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-296, ordering abatement on all properties shown on the attachment, with exception of property owned by Mario GnTman; and directed staff to prepare a report regarding the concerns stated in his letter of Dec. 7. Statton seconded and the motion carded 5-0. 20. Cupertino Dental Group - Public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning - Commission denial of Application 8-U-98. The application requests approval cfa use permit for a 1,890 square foot addition to an existing office building located at 10383 Torte Avenue. The appeal was filed by Ken Frangadakis, Cupertino Dental Group. Recommendation: Refer to Planning Commission. Mayor Dean opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Maddigan, representing the dental group, said that Mr. Frangadalds would prefer a February date for this hearing. Bumett moved to refer this item to the Planning Commission meeting of February 8. James seconded and the motion carded 5-0. 21. Second-story addition - Use permit application 14-U-97, Ji-Mei Chen, 10580 John Way, APN #359-18-005 - Use permit to construct a second story addition to an existing residence. Environmental determination: Categorically exempt. Continued from November 16. Cowan reviewed the staffreport and highlighted the architectural changes that had been made since this was last reviewed. Ms. Ji-Mai Chen said that as long as her proposal met the requirements of the ordinance and did not create privacy or noise issues, she should be able to build the style of her choice. However, she has tried to accommodate the concerns of the neighbors and the City. There have been many meetings with plarming staff and the Planning Commission, and the whole style of the house has been changed, including a reduction in size from 1,234 squ~are feet to 871 square feet. Her intention was to have December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page -- an addition large enough for herself and her two children, and the ground floor would be for her mother. She discussed the number of reviews and subsequent changes that had been made, and presented 6 letters of support from neighbors in her area. Cowan said that a use permit can be issued for second-story structures in an area designated for one-story limitation, provided that the Planning Commission det¢imines that the structure or structures will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, intrusive noise, or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area. The Planning Commission felt that the two-bedroom addition would be less intrusive. He showed elevations of the proposed addition. Mrs. Mabel McFarland, 10567 John Way, said she was representing the concerns of the resident homeowners of John Way, the signers of the R-1 petition, and possibly other city homeowners who wish to maintain established neighborhoods. Ms. Chen's proposal is not compatible with the adjoining ranch-style homes. She felt that the rules stated in the city code should be followed, not just the numbers. Any new construction or remodel should fit the scale of structure of the existing neighborhood, enhance the neighborhood character and identity, reinforce the low-intensity setting, etc. Mrs. Samantha Van Epps, 10525 John Way, agreed with the comments by Ms. McFarland. Ninety-nine percent of the residents on the street have remodeled in a one- - story fashion on very large lots, and she felt it difficult to believe that Ms. Chen needs the second-story addition so that her mother cannot come up the stairs. Mr Vogel McFarland, 10567 John Way, felt that the proposed addition still looks massive. Neighbors on both sides of Ms. Chen's home are very unhappy about the prospect. This project could have been approved 18 months ago had it been a single story building, but the delays are due to the applicant who has so many times presented plans which had not been seen before. The neighbors have tried to work with her, and she has listened politely but the plans do not reflect those changes. The neighbors applied for and were granted the R-l(i) single story designation in order to protect the character of this neighborhood. Mr. Sheldon Simmons, 3153 Sierra Way, San Jose, said he was representing Ms. Chen, and had been working with her for about four months on this process. He has seen written statements from 11 occupants on the street that are comfortable with the two- story design with three bedrooms. Ms. Chen began the process when she purchased the house almost two years ago and at that time was discussing the two-story addition with her neighbor, and that was probably what triggered the neighbors to start the petition for the R-l(i) designation. However, her request has been grandfathered in under the ordinance. He said the current design eliminates many of the problems raised by the neighbors, and he asked for Council approval. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page Mr. Joe Van Epps, 10525 John Way, read a letter that he had previously sent to City Council. The applicant states the addition is necessary to house her three-generation family, but he has heard her say that a three-bedroom upstairs is necessary for resale considerations. Whenever her reason, this addition must meet the intent and letter of the building code. Large two-story houses block out vistas, shade the sun, encroach on privacy, and violate the look and feel of the neighborhood. That was why the residents property owners signed the petition for a single-story designation. Approval of this request would set a precedent for a similar house to be built next-door to his property. That almost happened before, which is why the emergency interim ordinance was passed. He asked that Council deny any application for a large second-story addition. Bumett was pleased with the Planning Commission recommendation, which was to try to minimize the impact on the neighbors, and appears to be the best compromise. Statton said he liked several of the design elements such as the use of shingles, and wood siding instead of stucco. This is a difficult balance between community interest in property owners' rights. However, he felt that the roof was massive and ugly, so if the project were to the approved he would only be in favor of the smaller two-bedroom addition. James said this has been an arduous process for the community and poses a difficult - decision for Council. She understood the concerns of the John Way residents, but there is an exception process to allow a two-story home. She felt the three-bedroom addition would make it too massive, and felt the Planning Cortunission recommendation was the best compromise. Chang said neighbors were able to give input throughout this project, and based on the letters presented to Council tonight, about half of them feel comfortable with a second- story addition, even if it is three bedrooms. The Planning Commission is correct in taking all of that into consideration. Originally the message was that the whole neighborhood was in support of the single story concept. What has happened in other neighborhoods in the city was that they later changed their minds when they understood more about the process. There is a very contradictory message that is being given. That is not what Council is dealing with tonight, but it is a valid issue. He was in favor of the Planning Commission recommendation for a two-bedroom second-story. Burnett moved to approve the Planning Commission recommendation to allow a two- bedroom second-story addition. James seconded and the motion carried 4-1 with Statton voting no. 22. Taisei Construction Corporation & Peter Pau - Public hearing to consider an appeal of _ the Planning Commission denial of Application 11-EXC-98. The application requests a sign exception to exceed the allowed wall sign height for the Hilton Garden Inn located at 10741 N. Wolfe Road, in accordance with Chapter 17.24.060 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The appeal was filed by Peter Pau (property owner) and December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page 10 Richard C. Alpers, Sr., Taisei Construction Corp. Applicant requests withdrawal of appeal. Mayor Dean opened the public hearing. There were no speakers and the public hearing was closed. The item was withdrawn as requested by the applicant. PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None. NEW BUSINESS 23. Noise abatement on Highway 85 - Review of proposed letter to Assemblyman Jim Cunneen, as prepared by Council Member BurneR, supporting implementation of the noise abatement test corridor. Bumett moved to approve the letter to Assemblyman Cunneen. James seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 24. Review of Council committees and reassignments. - Council members reviewed their assignments and some changes were made. The following list reflects the current assignments Mayor Dean: Cupertino Audit Committee Economic Development Team Alternate Environmental Review Committee Legislative Review Committee Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission Santa Clara County Solid Waste Committee West Valley Mayors and City Managers Vice-Mayor Statton: Association of Bay Area Governments Alternate Economic Development Team Public Dialog Liaison Santa Clara County Committee on Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program- Alternate Santa Clara County Library JPA Board Sister City Committee - Toyokawa West Valley Mayors and City Managers Alternate December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page 11 Councilmember Burnett: Environmental Review Committee Alternate Library Expansion Committee North Central and Northwest Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee Santa Clara County Cities Association Representative, ABAG Board of Directors Santa Clara County Committee on Housing and Community Block Grant Program Santa Clara County Library JPA Board Alternate Santa Clara County Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee Santa Clara Valley Water Commission Senior Center Expansion Design Committee Councilmember Chang: Association of Bay Area Governments Joint Venture Silicon Valley Public Sector Round Table Alternate Leadership Cupertino Legislative Review Committee Library Expansion Committee Public Dialog Liaison Santa Clara County Cities Association -- Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission Alternate Couneilmember James: Cupertino Audit Committee Economic Development Team Leadership Cupertino Santa Clara County Cities Association Altemate Santa Clara County Drug and Alcohol Board Senior Center Expansion Design Committee 25. Authorization to award contracts - Homestead Road Arterial Management Project. Resolution No. 98-297. Public Works Director Bert Viskovieh said that only one bid was received, and it was much higher than the engineer's estimate. Statton moved to reject the bid and re-advertise the project. James seconded and the motion carried 5-0. December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council Page 12 26. Authorization to award contracts - Stevens Creek Boulevard at Saich Way Traffic Signal Pmj'ect. Resolution No. 98-298. Public Works Director Bert Viskovich said that only one bid was received, and they were reluctant to award based on that, although it was closer to the engineer's estimate. James moved to reject the bid and m-advertise this project. Statton seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 27. Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan: (a) Adoption of Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan. Resolution No. 98-299. (b) Certifying the availability of local share for the Miller Avenue Bicycle Lanes Project. Resolution No. 98-300. Public Works Director Bert Viskovich highlighted the staff report and said the bicycle plan will serve as a document for the City to seek federal funds. The long-range programs include a Mary Avenue over-crossing for pedestrians, De Anza bicycle path along the railroad tracks, and a future path along the park systems. The rest of the projects are mostly on local streets. -- Mr. Joe Walton, 21721 Columbus Avenue, said he was chair of the Bicycle-Pedestrian Committee. They are delighted that Council will receive this is a working plan for the future. Bumett moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-299, the Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan. Statton seconded and the motion carried 5-0. Bumett moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-300, certifying the availability of local share for the Miller Avenue Bicycle Lanes Project. Statton seconded in the motion carded 5-0. ORDINANCES 28. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1801: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 5.04.460 of the City's Ordinance Code Substituting the San Francisco/Bay Area Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area for the Month of October in Lieu of the Month of September." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumett moved and James seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion can'ied 5-0. Bumett moved and James seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1801. Motion carried 5-0. STAFF REPORTS - None COUNCIL REPORTS December 7, 199§ Cupertino City Council Page James said the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce had their second meeting of the Business & Education Committee and they are planning a summit, which looks very promising. She reported that she and Council Members Chang and Dean went to the Panasonic opening. She said that the Teen Task Force has been working to develop objectives for their next steps, including community input. Finally, representatives from the Economic Development Committee delivered gifts from the city to the Shane Company and Hilton Gardens, and took a tour of both facilities. Statton said in the paper last week there was a letter to the editor about post office service, and Councilmembers have received other letters. He asked the Mayor to consider inviting the Postmaster to give a presentation to the Council in January on the status of current service and what their plans are for the community. Bumett said the Senior Center Expansion Committee is making progress and the arohiteet will be returning on the 15th with designs and price quotes. He noted that he and Ray Chong met last week with the neighbors on Price Avenue. They started out with a request for speed bumps but instead decided to restrict both entrances so ears cannot enter the street at high speeds. They will also be looking at a simple traffic roundabout on a pilot basis. That kind of traffic control can reduce the severity of accidents. Burnett noted a newspaper column by Mr. Roadshow, which said that traffic engineers throughout the Valley have been in the process of removing crosswalks. The rationale is that crosswalks encourage pedestrians to walk un- safely. Burnett wrote a letter to Mr. Roadshow saying that accidents can be reduced to 0 by making it so dangerous that no one will attempt cross. Burnett said he hoped to see more aggressive methods in street design to make cities, Cupertino in particular, safer for pedestrians. He also plans to talk to be Transportation Advisory Authority. Chang noted that representatives from the City met with representatives from AAA regarding a proposal related to improving traffic safety through a variety of methods including education. Brown said this Thursday was the annual holiday employee party and invited the Councilmembers to attend. There will be a silent auction with proceeds to benefit Cupertino Community Services. Also, on Friday there will be a Council workshop. Mayor Dean said last night was the traditional Chrisa~as tree lighting ceremony, which was very enjoyable. Regarding graffiti, the city has been trying to work with Caltrans and will maintain their attempts to address the situation. CLOSED SESSION - None December 7, 1998 Cupertino City Council page 14 ADJOURNMENT At 9:05 p.m. Council adjourned to Friday, Dec. 11, 8:30 a.m., Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21975 San Fernando Avenue, for a workshop regarding the City's affordable housing program and alternative uses for the existing library building. City Clerk