CC 05-15-00 MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Adjourned Meeting (Workshop)
May 15, 2000
CALL TO ORI)ER
At 3:15 p.m. Vice=Mayor Sandra James called the meeting to order in Conference Room C/D,
10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, Califomia.
ROLL CALL
City Council members present: Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Don Bumett,
Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: Mayor John Statton.
Staff present: City Manager Don Brown, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood,
Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich,
Planner Michele Rodriguez, City Planner Ciddy Wordell, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
NEW BUSINESS
City Council study session:
(1) Santa Barbara Grill conversion to new use
Planner Michele Rodriquez highlighted the staff report. The project location is the Santa
Barbara Grill Restaurant on the southwest corner of Highway 280 off De P,n?a
Boulevard. The applicant asked for authorization to demolish the existing restaurant and
construct a new office building. Rodriguez said the packet includes a list prepared by the
applicant showing various alternatives for mixed use, along with the pros and cons of
each alternative. Also included are the 7 criteria that the Commnnlty Development
Department uses for similar general plan amendments and draw-downs. She highlighted
the unusual site characteristics, including noise and traffic from Highway 280, a high
voltage line along north property line, an unusually shaped parcel, alleyway access, and
an on-site oak tree. She noted a correction on page 2 of the staff report and said the figure
for "land use without a general plan amendment" should be 15,000 square feet, not
40,000, and the figure for "office and industrial" should be 4,000 square feet, not 10,000.
Mr. John Shelton, Shelton Development Company, said they originally intended to
convert the Santa Barbara Grill restaurant to an office use but other options were explored
as requested by the city. Those options included a restaurant, a mixed use project with
restaurant and office, mixed-use residential, multi-family apartments, and condomluiums.
They still feel that an office use is the best solution for this gateway location, but were
May If, :2000 Cupert'mo City Coundl rage 2
willing to address other options for residential use in the city wh~re residential is mom
suitable, such as a joint venture with another landowner. Another option would be to
provide extra fees toward the provision of housing elsewhere in the city.
Mr. Bill Hagtnan, architect, said that forcing a mixed use on this property with its unusu_~l
site characteristics would compromise the two functions, and he described the different
layouts that had been attempted.
Mr. Shelton, Mr. Hagman, and Mr. Dave Wheeler discussed the problems associated with
various uses in greater detail. Mr. Shelton said that a 25-unit apartment complex with
underground parking would face a $1.5 million to $2 million loss. He also discussed the
security issues faced by certain types of companies, such as high-tech computer firms, if
part of the building was accessible to the public, and explained that it would effectively
preclude a single tenant. Also, when they explored the feasibility of a hotel, it was felt
the site was too small and the access inadequate.
Burnett said he appealed this itein because he felt more housing was needed, not more
commercial. A housing shortage is the biggest risk to this valley's prosperity, and the
applicant is requesting a large increase in office space. Also, the city's ordinance states
that general plan changes are for the public good overall. Burnett explained why the rear
access to the neighborhood was a positive feature of this site for housing.
Mr. Shelton said they were asking for 40,000 square feet because the character of a
smaller building would only be feasible for multiple tenants. In the larger building, the
window-area-to-center-core depths work for a single tenant, open office landscape.
Chang asked that the developer bring back a plan that was workable for the developer,
and which was either all housing or a mixed use. He would prefer something that didn't
require a general plan amendment.
Lowenthal said he would accept a project that was all housing, but was flexible about
mixed use. However, he would not accept a project that was all office. He wasn't
convinced that a restaurant would not be a good solution. He felt that the applicant
should create a project that has a benefit to thc community.
Discussion followed about current restaurant use and the options for another restaurant,
or a mixed-use with restaurant, and the success rates of restaurants in the area.
James said that she would prefer a mixed use with retail or restaurant. She said it was
important not to take allocations away from retail or housing to create more office space
unless there is a benefit to the community. If housing is not provided here, it should be
provided somewhere else, or funds given to a project underway.
Burnett said the city's biggest need was for housing and he would not support the
proposal for office uses. He wanted the project to be all housing, and felt it could be just
as good a gateway project as an office building could be.
May 1~, 2000 12upettlno City ~2oune;1 Pa, e ~
Mr. Shelton said they would work to come up with a range of viable solutions, including
an option for providing funds for a multi-family housing/mixed use project slated for
Stevens Creek Boulevard, or a proposal for some funds for affordable housing.
Mr. Steve Andrews said there will be a lot of opportunities in the next few years to
change the use of other buildings, strip malls, etc., that will be much better suited to
housing than this location. He also noted the number of vacancies that exist in retail
centers.
At 4:20 p.m. the meeting ended. The regular business meeting of the Cupertino City Council
was held at 6:45 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
Kim~~i~y Clerk '
MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Monday, May 15, 2000
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Statton called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte
Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
City Council members present: Mayor $ohn Statton, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council
members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Council m~f,~bers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager Don Brown, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Adm'mistrative Services
Director Carol Atwood, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Parks and Recreation
Director Steve Dowling, Public Information Officer Donna Krey; Public Works Director Bert
Viskovich, City Planner Ciddy Wordell, Planner I Peter Gilli, Intern Rhys Rowland, and City
Clerk Kimberly Smith.
Consultants Present: Nicki Murphy, legal counsel; and Paul Anderson, Keyser Marston
- Associates, Inc.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS
1. Recognition to Santa Clara County Sheriff Officers Ron Karrle and Klm Morgcnthaler
for winning the first-place trophy at the 2000 Statewide' Pacific Grove Motor Officer
Competition.
Mayor Statton presented the certificate.
2. Recognition to Santa Clara County SheriffDeputies Janet Shannon and Bob Gallardo for
their participation in thc program "Every 15 Minutes," a two-day program for high school
students about drinking and driving, and personal safety.
Vice Mayor James presented the certificate.
POSTPONEMENTS
3. Item 20: Public hearing to consider a general plan amendment to exceed the allowed
height of 75 feet and to penetrate the l:l setback ratio from Stevens Creek Boulevard,
applications 2-GPA-99, 8-EA-99, and 9-EA-99, Kimpton Hotel and Restaurant Group
and Cupertino City Center land - continued to June 5.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None.
ORAL COM~IUNICATIONS
Gordon Fmlich, 1202 Belknap Court, talked about his efforts to qualify for an exemption from
the city's utility tax for GTE. He suggested publicizing the fact that residents over 65 years old
are exempt from the tax.
RECESS
At 7:01 p.m., Council recessed and the Redevelopment Agency convened. At 7:08 p.m. Council
reconvened.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Chang moved to approve the itca~s on the Consent Calendar, as reco~end~ with the
exception of item Nos. 11, 14, and 18. Burnett seconded and the motion carded 5-0.
4. Minutes: May 1 regular and May 5 adjourned meetings.
Accounts payable: April 28 and May 5, Resolutions 00-140 and 00-141.
6. Payroll: April 14, Resolution 00-142.
-- 7. Treasurer's Budget Report, March 2000.
8. Consenting to and calling a joint public hearing on the proposed redevelopment plan for
the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project, Resolution 00-143.
9. Making det=m~inations and approving the reorganization of territory designated "N.
Stell'mg Road 00-01," approximately 0.22 acre located on the East Side of bi. Stelling
Road between Garden Gate Drive and Greenleaf Drive, GB Estate Homes LLC (APN
326-30-089), Resolution 00-144.
10. Annual AT&T cable rate increase.
11. Removed from Consent Calendar.
12. Setting date for consideration of reorganization of area designated "San Fernando
Avenue 00-05," property located on the north side of San Fvmando Avenue between
Byme Avenue and Orange Avenue, approximately 0.456 acre, Wang and Yen, (APN
357-15-047 and 357-15-048), Resolution No. 00-146.
13. Review of application for Alcoholic Beverage Control license: Tory's Restaurant, 10457
South De Anza Boulevard.
14. Removed from Consent Calendar.
15. Change order no. 1, Cupertino Senior Center Expansion, Project 99-9210, Resolution 00-
147.
16. Authorization to submit a funding request form to Department of Conservation's
Division of Recycling to receive funds for recycling containers, Resolution 00-148.
17. Improvement agreement with Adc Bash and Hanna Bash at 10115 Salch way, APN 326-
32-034, Resolution 00-149.
18. Removed fi'om Consent Calendar
Vote Council members
Ayes: BurneR, Chang, Sames, Lowenthal, and Statton
Nocs: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
11. Declaring brush growing on certain described property to be a public nuisance and setting
hearing for objections to proposed removal, Resolution 00-145.
The City Clerk said the list specifying the properties had not been received. Staff
recommended amending the resolution to change paragraph 2 to read, "That said
nuisance exists upon all of the streets, sidewalks, highways, roads and private property
more particularly described by common names or by reference to the tract, block, lot,
code area, and parcel number on the report to be provided by the Fire Marshal." Burnett
moved to adopt Resolution No. 00-145 as amended. James seconded and the motion
passed 5-0.
14. Acceptance of municipal improvements: Zankich Construction, Inc., Echo Hill Court at
Stelling, Tract 8998.
Lowenthal said he noticed a large pothole in the bike lane at this location.
Public Works Director Viskovich said the area is settling because of a water line owned
by San Jose Water Company. They have been notified and will take care of the probl~ul.
Lowenthal moved to accept the improvements. Sames seconded and the motion passed 5=
0.
18. Designating pe~'lt parking zone on Bonny Drive betwccn Scofield Drive and Shelly
Drive, Resolution 00-150.
Lowenthal referred to a letter from a resident who thought there should be no pe,a,it
parking required on Bonny Drive. Since he had gone on record as opposed to permit
parking, he asked staff to explain why this should take place.
Viskovich said approval of the resolution would extend permit parking to Saturdays
because of the De AnT~ College flea market.
James said she could agree to extending the permit parking for the first Saturday of each
month only.
Marilyn Lewis, 10166 Bonny Drive, said the neighbors had submitted the petition
because of parking problems related to Faria School as well as the flea market. She said
people do not observe permit parking laws during the week.
Gary Lure, 20810 Pepper Tree Lane, said he was opposed to the proposal as stated, but
he supported the intent. He said he could support permit parking on the Saturdays when
the flea market was held.
Bumett agreed with the change suggested by James.
Lowenthal said he could not support expanding.permit parking because it is not being
enforced where it is already in effect. In addition, it is already hard to find parking in the
community, particularly around the parks. He suggested that citizens contact the school
board.
James moved to adopt Resolution No. 00-150 to extend parking to the first Saturday of
each month. Bumett seconded and the motion passed 4-1 (Lowenthal - no).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
19. Community input on Library site alternatives
At 7:15 p.m., Mayor Station opened the public hearing.
Peter Kalnay, 20276 Pacifica Drive, said he was a fervent supporter of a truly excellent
library. He said he thought aesthetics would have to be one of the main considerations
when the council chose a site. He said he did not think the plaza was worth preserving on
aesthetic grounds.
Sheila Dolezal, 10550 Whitney Way, said her family enjoys both fields and she was not
_ convinced that these were the only two options available. She did not think the library
measure would have passed if it had stated that the community would lose one of the two
areas. She hoped they could do something with the existing structure, and if these were
the only two options, she was in favor of saving the field as were her neighbors. She said
May 15, 9~000 Pa~e 5
-' Cupertino was about family value, open spaces, and great schools, all of which contain
libraries. She asked that council consider other alt¢~aatives.
Paul Bommarito, 10684 Martinwood Way, said he had talked to city officials and
conducted an opinion survey since the last meeting. Regarding the use of the fields, he
said all fields are intended primarily for and used by Cupertino residents. In addition, all
fields are booked in advance, either by the Parks and Recreation Depathaent or the
school district. He said children have first priority on the use of the fields. Therefore,
there is a heavy demand for the library field. His own survey showed that only 2
households out of the 40 people he talked to wanted the library on Site A, and one
household had mixed feelings. He was in favor of keeping the filed, and said there
should be a general survey or a vote.
Michael McDougall, Cupertino Ultimate Frisbee League, said he had been playing on the
field for ten years and showed a picture of him taken during a game by the Cupertino
Courier. He said Site B was too small for Ultimate Frisbee, and he would appreciate
being able to continue playing on Site A.
Arthur Harris, 1052 Tuscany Place, principal of a junior high school in Los Altos, said
his wife was chair of the Planning Commission. He said Site A had better aesthetics
than Site B. He said it may be useful to include the pwblem of which is the better site,
what are the reasons, and how they can make the library best work on one site or another
- in the selection of the architect for the library.
Theresa Logg, 20234 Pacifica Drive, said she loved the field and had lived in Cupertino
since she was four years old. She recalled the last time the library was renovated. She
agreed that Sites A and B are not the only options. She thought they were both beautiful
spaces and should be left as they are.
Gerry Mulvey, 20303 Clifden Way, talked about the issue of parking and discussed the
complications created by having to add more parking spaces. He said the bicentennial
redwood grove should be considered part of the open space. Mr. Mulvey said they should
plan for the future and the expandability of the library and adequate parking by using Site
A.
Rachel Friedman, 20260 Pacifica Drive, said Cupertino was running out of open space
and becoming more and more urban. Once a structure is built, open space is gone
forever. She thought the problem with creeks overflowing during rain stosms was partly
because there is less open space to absorb the water. She said they need to encourage
children's physical, capabilities as well as their intellect. Her opinion was that the library
should be built on Site B if anywhere.
Jose Friedman, 20260 Pacifica Drive, agreed with his wife and added that he understood
that as we see more population growth in Cupertino, there is a need to build more
structures such as buildings, roads, and libraries. Once the library is built, even if it is
decided that it wasn't the most optimum way to use the space, he did not think they could
do much about it regaining the space. He said when the space is lost, there is also a loss
of the essence of Cupertino, which is about families getting together.
15, 000 Pa e 6
Oded Raviv, 10536 Whitney Way, said his sons played soccer on this field. He stresscd
how important the soccer field was to the younger generation.
Curtis Woodruff said he and his wife, Lois, have lived on Rodrigues Avenue for 48 years
and have always been active users and volunteers at the library. He said they favor Site
A for the location of the new building. He said in order to be successful, the new
building must be designed for maximum economy in construction, maximum efficiency
of library operation, maximum utility of the patrons, and flexibility to meet unknown
future demands. He said the field area was acquired for possible future construction of
additional city buildings and now is a good time to use it.
Jean Gallup, 10356 Plum Tree Lane, said she thought the signs asking people where the
library should be built were misleading. She said Site B cannot physically accommodate
the same size library, the surrounding immediate area, and the room for expansion that
Site A can, and council should consider the consultant's report as their regulation
minimum size for the library because library usage continues to grow. Regarding the
theory that the Internet will so dil~inish library use there will never be a need for
expansion, she said the Internet has been around for at least five years and library use
numbers keep going up. Many people use the soccer field, but a million and half people
visit the library every year, and that number is increasing. She had toured a lot of
libraries in the past two years and the librarians had never mentioned that their libraries
were too big, but rather they they were already out of space. She showed a picture of a
library in Oxnard which is facing that problem. She thought Cupertino was very fortunate
that the far-seeing city fathers purchased the entire Torte block for civic use. She asked
that council master plan the whole parcel and put the library on Site A.
Barbara Rogers, 19764 Auburn Drive, said she had been a participant and coach in
sports. She thought people need stimulus in various areas including the arts, physical
activity, and mental activity. She said the city had provided a balance, including public
facilities, fine arts, and parks. She thought the city had done very well in addressing the
needs of the youth, and perhaps it was time thcy looked at adult needs. This should be
done by the parks and recreation department on a citywide basis, then a policy adopted by
thc city council and implemented by parks and recreation. She said there were passive
uses available now at Mcnioriai Park, Linda Vista Park, and maybe others. If they decide
to continue using the field for sports, it would require an amendment to the general plan.
She talked about other things the city provided, noting that there is one library. She said
they have the chance to do it right. If they squeeze it into the plaza, they would need
underground parking or use Site A for parking.
Y. Diana Wu, 10445 Imperial Avenue, ~iterated her support for Site A because there is
space for parking, there could be a drive-through book drop which would not be possible
at Site B, and they would not have to go beyond two stories which they might have to do
in order to fit a 63,000 sq. ft. building on Site B. She said Site B is a safe place for
children and the elderly. In conclusion, she said they need room for future growth, and
that the Internct is a good tool but is not a substitute for books.
Leslie Burncn, 21466 Holly Oak Dr/ve, congratulated those who had put togoth~' the
library survey. He described options and proposed one that included do/~olishing the
current library, locating the library in portable buildings on the field, and building the
library where the current one is, using some of the plaza and the field. He said this would
allow for future expansion of the library and city hall.
Christina Berretti, 10695 Martinwood Way, said she was 12 years old, and was nmning
for ecological commissioner at her school. She thought it would be safer for people if the
library were on Site B. She said she and her friend were going to join soccer next year
and would like to play on the Site A field.
Carol EmLeti, 10695 Martinwood Way, said she would like the open space maintained.
She thought there may be somewhere else to locate the library, or perhaps the current one
could be expanded and they could keep both sites green.
Mel Couchman, 20272 Pacifica Drive, said he was a fifth generation native of the valley.
He and his wife grew up on farms in the San Jose area and have seen green space
disappear, particularly urban green space. He thought we could not afford to lose any
more. From an ecological point of view, Site A is a habitat for seagulls, squirrels, and
mallards. He said he thought it was an obligation to preserve Site A.
Ian Hendry said he worked at 1 Infinite Loop and has been playing Ultimate Frisbee on
the field twice a week for about ten years. He reiterated that once land is built upon, it's
hard to get it back as open space. He said that in addition to having fun playing, the
people who play foLic~ a community of their own. He urged council not to stop with the
plans submitted by the architect and consultants but to continue the planning process.
Mitchell Adler, 10090 Pasadena Avenue, #B3, an Ultimate Frisbee player, asked that if
they have to choose between the two sites, then build the library on Site B. People from
all over the world have heard about and visited their game. He expressed concern about
the cost, but said he would prefer that they spend more money and preserve the open
space.
Pat Rogers, 19764 Auburn Drive, said there was usually more than one way to
accomplish an objective. He thought council had to base their decision on certain factors,
one of them being what is the greatest good for the greatest number. He said the library
is by far the most heavily used public facility in the city. Opposition to the land-banked
field seemed to be limited to a relatively small number of people when compared to
library users. Mr. Rogers did not think a multi-story library could be efficiently run. He
said there were many advantages to Site A, and they could not preserve the field because
they would need to use part of it for parking.
Jim Yglesias, 21010 Classic Court, said when he moved to Cupertino in 1983, he rode his
bicycle around town and marveled at the parks. He grew up in Brooklyn Heights where
it was all concrete, but they had a world-class library. He said he did not miss living
there. He said if/hey lose the fields they will never get them back. There are thousands
of kids who play soccer every week, almost year-wund. He said they were talking about
taking away a field that was not used by the youth and telling the adults who use it to go
May 15, 9~000 Page
somewhere else. Practice fields are hard to find. He said he liked a Plan C which would
keep the field and find another solution besides Site A or B.
Christine Ott, 10690 Martinwood Way, said she and her husband were there on behalf of
the younger citizens of Cupertino, including their son Kevin. She said they were in favor
of putting the new library anywhere but in the field.
Mary Minow, said she loved opec space and had heard a lot about greec space
disappearing. This is not true in Cupertino. Cupertino has spent $60 million in the last
tec ycars in parks and opec space. She said she camc as an advocate of people with
disabilities and referred to the parking problems that would be encountered if the library
were placed on Site B. She said she was interested in a Plan C and opposed to Plan B.
Ronda Hoxsie, 10545 Mira Vista Road, said she agreed with Mr. Ygleaias regarding a
new alternative, and eccouraged council to not just look at the two options. She said she
was in favor of keeping as much open space as possible.
Suzanne Sclar, 10581 Whitney Way, asked how to get on the committee that was making
the decision. Mayor Statton explained the process and said that committee would be
inviting input as well. Ms. Sclar said she hoped council would listen to what people had
to say. She said there is a need for fields and expressed a preference for Site B.
-- Janet Shaw, a resident of the Rancho Rinconada area of Cupertino, said she could not
believe there were only two solutions and thought they should have a contest for
architectural solutions with the local colleges. She asked that the entire block be looked
at as a whole, not just for this project. She said she liked the current design of the
buildings and plaza. She thought Site A should be considered, but that a sense of opec
space could be maintained, and achieved with good architecture.
Kathy Mulvey, 20303 Clifdec Way, said on the map Site A and Site B appear to be about
the same size. In reality Site A is much larger. She said they could locate the library on
Site B, but there would only be 22 feet between it and city hall. If the library were made
deeper, parking spaces would be eliminated. If they are going to keep three buildings
they will have to add parking. Adding it underground would only provide 68 spaces at a
tremendous cost. She said they were going to lose the field anyway because they have to
put parking somewhere. She said one of the reasons she liked Site A is that it there
would a lot of room around the library.
Arlene Boyd, 20301 Clifden Way, said after research, she wondered why they had to just
consider Sites A and B. Her concern with either site was the influx of traffic from
Bollinger and DeAnza and the possible loss of the traffic barrier on Pacifies.
Rhonda Nuflez, 11351 Bubb Road, said she was a soccer mom and was involved in the
community. She said she was an advocate of saving Site A. She commented that this
_ could be a win-win situation. She was in favor of a Site C combination of Site B and the
current library, which could be achieved with good architectural design, or it could be
built on another site. Cupertino has developed a reputation of cultivating and supporting
May 15, 2000 Page
athletics for all ages. Also, Cupertino is recognized world wide for thc opportunity it
provides for the development of competitive soccer. She said the needs of the
community have changed and they need to keep the open space.
Diane Lee, 20234 Pacifica Drive, said she was for Site C which would incorporate the
library plus Site B. She talked about parking options.
Thc mayor closed the public hearing at 8:50 p.m.
James thanked those who had given input. She stressed that council had looked at other
alternatives including retrofitting or demolishing the current library. The architects
applying for the job will present preFuninary plans as part of their application for the job.
Council has not made up their mlrlds regarding location of thc building or parking at this
point.
Lowenthal said that the vote indicated that the community overwhelmingly wanted a new
library. He said thc input would be very valuable in their decision making.
Chang agreed that the hearings had been helpful. The next step is having the architect
look at how many of those suggestions they can address, and the pros and cons of each
site.
Bumett said they had come a long way on the r~brary, and they would not be able to make
everyone happy. However, he was optimistic that the community would be improved
with the new library and they would try to minimize the loss of green space.
Station thanked the audience and told them what the next steps would be looking at
architectural ideas and considering the ideas presented by the public.
There was a recess from 8:50-8:55 p.m.
20. Public hearing to consider a general plan amendment to exceed the allowed height of 75
feet and to penetrate the 1:1 setback ratio from Stevens Creek Boulevard. Applications
2-GAP-99, 8-EA-99, and 9-EA-99, Kimpton Hotel and Restaurant Group and Cupertino
City Center Land; Lots 6 and 1, Tract 7953, Cupertino City Center. A mitigated negative
declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval - eantinued to
June 5.
21. Appeal of Planning Commission denial of application 1-DIR-00, request to move an oak
tree and replace with an evergreen tree at a single-family residence at 10135 Scenic
Boulevard. Applicant/appellant Mary Graham.
Planner I Peter Gilli presented the staff report. He said the homeowner and her neighbor
agreed that the tree should be removed because it would do significant damage to the
retaining wall. An arborist's report validated that would be the case.
Mary Graham, 10135 Scenic Boulevard, said when they moved in ten years ago, the tree
was small. She did not think it would be long before the tnmk would grow until it would
press against the neighbor's wall and cause damage, which would be a significant issue
for both them end their neighbor. She thought the tree would eventually die anyway.
She said they were more than willing to replace it with two new trees at the lower part of
the driveway. She confi~iied that they and their neighbor were in agreement about
removing the tree.
Bumett moved to sustain the appeal of the Planning Commission decision regarding
Application 1-D]R-00. James seconded and the motion carried $-0.
22. Appeal of Planning Commission appwval of application 15-EXC-99 for fence exception
of an electronic security gate at 22525 Balboa Road in accordance with Chapter 16.28 of
the Cupertino Municipal Code. Applicant Anne Dor and Appellant Council member Don
BurneR.
Planning Intern Rhys Rowland reviewed staff's recommendations
Anne Dor handed out a photo of the original gate on Balboa Road before the entrance
was moved and explained why it was moved. She said there would be landscaping to
help hide the wall, and the hill had been greatly improved as well. The gate had been put
in by the previous owner because of trespassing from the open space adjacent to the
property. She said the road had been built to meet city standards in case it was accepted
in the future by the city for dedication as a public wad. She said it looks like a public
road and it makes it inviting to explore their property, even though it is posted as private
property. She explained their concerns with security and fire prevention, and said they
find evidence of pm'ties on their property because there is no gate. A chain they had
installed across the road had been r¢/iioved on several occasions. She said it is private
land from Stevens Canyon Road up to the house, and they would like to secure the
property from ill-intentioned people. She said a letter was sent the council from the
adjacent property owner who has a gate, and a home across the street also has a gate. She
showed where the property is posted. She said the gate would be six feet tall and would
swing open from the middle.
Bumett expressed concern about the road, a prospective city street, being gated off.
When other homes are built he felt there would be less need for security. He said they
had gone to a lot of trouble with the hillside policy, and he was always concerned when
projects change aRer they are approved. He said it was apparent that there are serious
safety pwblems there, but rather than have it be voluntary that the gates be moved back
up the hill when further development occurs, it be mandatory when a certain amount of
building has taken place. The road would then be open until you reach the individual
houses.
Chang agreed with Burnett that this was private property and there were some security
concerus.
May 15, ~000 Page 11
Lowenthal said he thought they deserved some protection from people going to the open
space. He suggested having it come back for a review in a certain length of time.
James also agreed they needed a gate and liked the new location.
Statton said he did not like gates. However, he thought this case deserved an exception.
He said he liked the idea of masldng the large cut in the hillside with landscaping.
Bumett moved to deny the appeal and directed that Condition 3 be modified to state that
it will be reviewed by the city council in five years to dete.,aine if it should be modified
to remove or relocate the gate. In addition, Condition 5 will be added stating that withinn
six months the applicant shall plant clinging vines along the wall to mask out the wall,
along with instalrmg irrigation, subject to review by the Community Development
Director. James seconded and the motion passed 5-0.
PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None.
NEW BUSINESS
23. Council appwval of composition of the Sports Center Building Design Advisory
Committee.
The following people spoke in favor of including handball courts in the new design:
Sherm Waldman, 7585 Bollinger Road
Vernon and Denise East, 10635 Johnson Avenue
Jim Guidott/, 22640 Ricardo Road
Jack Murphy, 7603 Newcastle Drive
Lowenthal moved to endorse the staff recommendation regarding composition of the
committee with the addition of a person representing handball and racquetball players,
and to appoint Bumett as the Council representative. Burnett seconded and the motion
passed 5-0.
ORDINANCES - None
STAFF REPORTS - None
May 15, 2000 Pase 12
'--' COUNCIL REPORTS
James informed them that Leadership Cupertino had hired Barbara Nunes and Gaff
Jensen as Co-Executive Directors for Tomorrow's Leaders Today. She and other council
meinber attended the kickoff of the Cupertino Community Services capital campaign for
the affordable housing project. The event was hosted by the firefighters. She attended
the Rotary golf tournament on Saturday, which raised money to furnish the new senior
center.
Lowenthal said that this is Bike to Work Week and tomorrow is Bike to Work Day.
Chang agreed that they had hired a good team to lead Tomorrow's Leaders Today. He
reported that he attended the Cities Association meeting at which there was a presentation
regarding the de-regulation of utilities. He suggested that Cupertino look into the
possibility of raising revenues in connection with that de-regulation.
Bumett said the housing committee for the County Housing Authority met and
recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a list of projects which included the
money for the CCS project.
CLOSED SESSION
At 9:58 p.m., Council recessed to a closed session regarding City Manager recruitment
pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, labor negotiations -
Discussed
At 10:05 p.m. Council reconvened in open session. The City Attorney announced that
they had discussed potential additional inputs with respect to selection of city manager
and gave direction to thc mayor to that effect.
At 10:05 p.m., Council adjourned to Tuesday, May 16, 1:30 p.m., conference room A, for a
closed session regarding the city manager recmPu-uent.
Ki~City Clerk