11080098 ALLIED•:
ENGINEERING
COMPANY"°:7
April 17, 2012
File No. 1008
City of Cupertino
Building Department, .
10300 Torre Avenue B
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255_
Re: Foundation Verification
L
Tract No. 10088—'16t14
20626 Cleo Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Bldg. Permit No.4.10800'
APN: 362-31-004
Dear Sirs/Madams:
On April 2, 2012, Allied•-Engidee ing;Company checked the position of the foundation forms for the
building on Lot 4 ofTracv - '30088 and•fouad them to be in conformance with the setbacks shown on
the approved Architectural,,Site�Pliih,did;the pad elevation to be in substantial conformance with the
design grades ofthe.appcovediGrading Plan:
If you have questions.or,commen.ts regarding any,of the above, please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY
' �� ��i�rVy�'--• QRpFESS/p
h �g y� 2
Lester Ikegami
RCE 30520 C30520 p
Expires: 3-31-14 a t
mp CNll.
4)F OF CAt.1E�P
Li:pi
cc: B. Koontz, Habitat For Hiiinanity Silicon Valley
Allied Engineering CompanyA'Divisbn-of IK-GM , 3170 Williams Road (406)241-1960 allied@ alliedengccom
Cor sullied Engineers,Ini. San Jose,CA 95117 (406)241-3047 Fax
i
T.MAKDISSY CONSULTM,INC.
EmigCsa hnical Comhan s
IBM
Project No. E127-I
April 20, 2012
Mr. Brent Koontz
Construction Manager
Habitat for Humanity
513 Valley Way
Milpitas, CA 95035
Subject: Building Pad, Lot 4
20626 Cleo Ave,Permit No. 11 08009t)
Cupertino, CA
REPORT OF TESTING AND D OBSERVATION SERVICES
DURING PAD GRADING OPERATIONS
References: 1) Geotechnical Investigation
By: T. Makdissy Consulting, Inc.
Dated: Feb 4, 2011
Dear Mr. Koontz:
In accordance with your authorization T. Makdissy Consulting, Inc., has provided engineering
consultation, observation and testing services during pad grading operations for the Lot 4, building
pad of the subject project. This letter is a summary of our observations and test results.
Grading on the subject lots commenced by stripping, clearing the area of all existing vegetation and
debris and removing 18 to 24 inches from the building site. The native material was then scarified,
moisture conditioned, then compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90%. Fill material
consisting of quarry fines was imported and placed on the building pads to bring it to design grade.
23 Las Colinas Lane,Suite 106 I San Jose,California 95119
Phone:(408)227-8595 1 Fax(408)227-1672
The satisfactory placement of fill was determined by field observation and performance of in-place
field density and.laboratory,compaction;dests. •The.laboratory compaction tests were performed to
i
determine the maximumA.l y;density and the optimum moisture content of the soil used for fill.
i
Compaction tests were;:performed in,accordance with Laboratory Test Procedures ASTM D1557-
94. The results of these tests are summaiized on Tablet I. A nuclear gauge was used to determine
the in-situ percentage of dry-density and moisture content. Nuclear gauge density methods were
generally in accordance with ASTM D2922-91 and D3017-88. The in place test results along with
the achieved relative compaction are included in Tables I & 1I.
Pad grading operations for.the building-pad-were generally performed in accordance with the
recommendations contained in the aforegentioned reference. The pad is ready to receive building
improvements; Surface•drainage must�be.provided as designed by the project Civil Engineer and
Jinaintained:by the property.=owners at all-.times. The building pads are ready to receive foundation
improvements.
:'Should you hay.e,any questions relating to the contents of this letter or should additional
info'r"iion be required; 016ase contact our'office at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
TMakdissy Consulting,In ApFE 810
_ Q��6'•MAI(p�s�Fy
No.559 m
Tom MakdissyiRE., Exp:, (L¢
Principal Engineer *'srp�0TEC1iN`�P�`P
OE CAUF�
I
I
' i I
Copies:4 to addressee
i
•Project No.El 27-1 E.Cleo Ave Habitat For Humanity
TABLE
.SUMMARY OF,LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Maximum Optimum
Dry .,Moisture
Density Content
Curve N .Description _ (p.c.f.) (%)
1 Brown Sandy,Silty Material with trails of gravel 128.0 12.1
2 'Gray quarry fine to medium coarse 142.0 6.7
TABLE II
SUMMARY.OF,FIELD DENSITY.TEST RESULTS
Depth Moisture Dry Max.Dry Relative !
and/or I Content Density j Density Compaction
Date Test Elev. Area _ "., . .Location % PCF Curve i PCF %
i
t
2123/12 4 405.0 M, Lot#4, 15.5 115.3 1 128.0 90%
3/6/12 8 294.5 '•Lot#4 10.8 130.0 2 142.0 92%
3/11/12 12 F.G Lot#4 12.4 137.7 2 142.0 97% i
Notes:
1) Curve numbers refer to SoilType from TABLE I
2) M=mass grading
3) Depth/Elevation established from grade stakes and/or grading plan provided
4) FG=Finished Grade
5) P= Pavement
6) AB=Agregate Base i
7) AC=Asphalt Concrete .I
8) JT=Joint Trench
9) S= Sewer Llne
10)SD=Storm Drain
11)W=Water Line
I
it
i
i
T.Makofissy Consulting,Inc.
i
i
tr / V G w info
%U1en ineers.com
V a`J' mlo®baggonginoors.com �
0 o phone:650.852.9133 fax:650.852.9138
o,ENGo 847 West Maude Ave,Sunnyvale,California 94085-2911
DSA FILE#
SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT DSA APPL#
DSA/LEA#
Special Inspection Reports must be distributed to the parties listed below within 14 days of the inspection. Reports of non-compliant conditions
must be distributed immediately.Separate reports shall be prepared for each type of special inspection,on a daily basis.Each report shall be
completed and signed by the special inspector conducting the inspection.
Project Name: `j o /a f J, ,,meq t„ �L. / Date/Day: - Z-5-1 /L.
Client Project #: Time Arrived:
Project Location: Z-G> Cp T Time Departed:
Contractor: Bldg Permit#: //Q Travel Time:
Inspection Coverage: ❑concrete ❑Masonry ❑Welding-Shop
Co ❑Prestressed Concrete ❑High Strength Bolting ❑Welding-Field
103 Periodic Reinforcing Steel ❑Expoxy Bolts/Dowel
Tbs
t DSA Approved Documents:
Describe inspections made, including locations:
7/Fv. t°(.rct�li1t-N� ri rt' (_ 1�,, �S I✓]
G,n l r, /� G/t�,,� �FZr r ft p, / .J"r)&_A6 14r
.
E
Tests made:
Items requiring correction,corrections of previously listed items,and previously listed uncorrected items:
List changes to approved plans by architect or engineer:
IVi7 /C
Comments:
The Work tAS ❑WASNOT J--
Inspected in accordance with the requirements of the DSA/Building ,,
Department approved documents ��.1.4
Material Sampling ❑WAS ❑WAS NOT XN/A Signature of Special Inspector
Performed in accordance with DSA approved documents g t( t.6 ) _1/l�c
A• t / _1 1
The Work inspected *MET ❑DIDNOTMEET Print Name/Title
The requirements of the DSA/Building Official Approved Documents 41y, z S414110
a, Pf.jo,1 ArCh,nid Certification #
structural Engineer
Protect Inspector
DSA Regional Office/Building Donartmenl
ff-
elLIE
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Norman Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley
513 Valley Way
Milpitas, CA 95035
Scheel Re: Cleo Avenue Job # 11101 Inspection Clarification 20bUP 0-leo
A✓e
//0800lj$
This letter is to clarify that we have reviewed the conditions at the roof and floor
level regarding the following options. In our opinion the as-built conditions are
Structural adequate. �yy(
1. Shear transfer at roof,The l "M r1
shear transfer at the girders
n ; i n e e r truss is adequate the
diaphragm shear at this area is 13'
50212 Sunrise Blvd small. G•. )'�'�_
Fair Oaks,CA 95626
(916)536-9585
(916)536-0260(fax) ` '
1989-3013 ^'r - ¢,�• Q..
33 yem3 oJrsccllence --� J"`�ss� r • 11
2. The floor trusses over the
bearing walls may be drilled _Norman Scheel,S.L. to allow plumbing vents to — - -
LEED AP BD+C
LEED AP Homes pass thru floor area. -
Fellow-SEAOC
Fellow-ASCE _-
E-mail:nnnmumssc.cnm
Rab Coon i
General Manager
E-mail:mhcnnaamssccnm '
r ..meg ':Slj
Steve Smith P.L.
Pmjed Manage - ��+�...- : • r
E-mall:s+cresmilhianar.com -
StevenCuo
CAD Supervisor
If you have any questions,please call Rob Coon.
CAD Suor
E-mail:smvnFnnssa.cmn
Q¢OFESS/O
Jacide Winslow
OR=Managerhist' PN
E-mail:incl:icmmssc.anm 'F
/Norman Scheel `P
Structural Engineer ¢ No. z
1 P
LP lA'(/crUaP�a1P
lF OF CAO1
OCT 17 2012