Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
21. Oaks Shopping Center
CITY OF CUPERTINO Summary Agenda Item No. City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408} 777-3308 Fax:.(408} 777-3333 Community Development Department Agenda Date: May 17, 2008 Application: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 Applicant : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Properly Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Oaks Shopping Center) APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL {file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-2007-0b) to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct ~ a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, ~5b,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION (file no. EXC-2008-07) to the Heart of the City Specific PIan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP {TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot. TREE REMOVAL (TR-200$-02} request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: On a unanimous vote the Planning Commission recommended: • approval of a negative declaration for the project; and • approval of the project per the model resolutions 21-1 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard 2 Project Data: General Plan Designation: Specific Plan: Zoning Designation: Acreage {Net): Building Area: June 17, 2008 Commercial/Residential Heart of the City Specific Plan P- Stevens Creek Boulevard Conceptual Planned Development Zoning 8.1 acres Existing Shopping Center: 73,056 sq. ft. Demo Theater (Phase 1): -15,263 sq. ft. Demo Comm'1 Space (Phase 2): - 2,430 sq. ft. 122-Roam Hotel (Phase 1): 61,822 sq. ft. Mixed-Use Bldg. (Phase 2}: 56,194 sq. ft. Building Height: Max. Proposed Bldg. Height (Hotel) 44' 10" General Plan Maximum Heightrs 45 feet Stories: Hotel: 4 stories; Mixed-Use Bldg: 3 stories Parking. Shared Parking Required (Phase 1): 356 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 1): 494 stalls Shared Parking Required (Phase 2): 417 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 2): 470 stalls on-grade garage podium 410 84 305 165 Zoning: Yes Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed the project on May 27, 2008 and June 10, 200$ and took public testimony at both hearings (Exhibit A-2). A 1/z mile radius was noticed for the hearings. Over 1,500 notices were mailed to property owners and given to Oaks Shopping Center tenants. DISCUSSION Applicant Comments • See the applicant's written responses to the June lOs' Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit B~2). • Applicant has revised the condominium plan, changing the wording and reducing the number of commercial condominiums from four to two to address the Building Division's and Planning Commission s concerns {Exhibit C-2). 21 -2 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-Ob 21265 Stevens. Creek Boulevard Page 3 June 17, 2008 • Applicant has revised .building elevation to address City Architect's design comments {Exhibit D-2}. Changes are largely confined to the front {east} elevation only. • Applicant has indicated that a smaller hotel and/ or smaller, mixed-use building is not financially feasible. • Applicant is not in favor of phasing the Stevens Creek Boulevard {Heart of the City, (HOC}) landscape and sidewalk improvements. The shopping center owner is not willing to share the cost of improvements and the applicant is not willing to bear the entire cost. They view the HOC landscaping as an "off-site" improvement because they are subdividing the property and the portion they want to develop has limited Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage. • Applicant proposes afive-year expiration period to initiate the Phase 2 work. Public Comments Between the first and second hearings, staff received two emailed comments about the project (Exhibit E-2}. The Commissioners indicated they received many more emails, not copied to staff. Four citizens spoke at the second public hearing. • One of the four said the 1/z mile radius mailing was inadequate, that the Oaks Center is being overbuilt. Both proposed buildings should be shrunk and the landscaped areas increased in size. • Another resident stated that properties next to freeways should be considered polluted (from air pollution) and that the City should discourage buildings in these areas because it puts residents, customers and employees in areas more hazardous to their health. • Another resident suggested that a portion of the commercial tenant space in the mixed use building should be reserved for independent business owners, not corporate chain stores. • The owner of Hobee's Restaurant wanted an explanation of how the parking supply and garbage collection would work since it appeared that some of the parking would be in an underground garage (not shared) and the central garbage enclosure would be on the Sandhill property. City/ Sta f Comments 21 -3 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06; TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 4 June 17, 200$ • Phasing: Staff was .not in favor of the phasing proposal. Staff felt the second phase would not be built and it would leave a gap in the shopping center. Staff preferred that both buildings be completed at the same time. • Mary Avenue Landscaping/Street Parking Loss: The hotel must have a more generous rear landscaped setback from Mary Avenue or else the hotel will appear to be too massive..This can be accomplished by setting the~hotel back 20 additional feet from the Mary Avenue property line (40 feet total) and heavily landscaping the area with trees, or converting about 3b Mary Avenue diagonal parking stalls to landscaped area with street trees. • Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart,_of the City} Landscapin~• The development addition is significant and will increase the shopping center building square footage by about 137°/a. The applicant should install the full Heart of the City landscape improvement from the westerly driveway to Mary Avenue. Because of the restricted frontage depth between the two driveways, a modified, and less costly, landscape improvement has been recommended by staff. •. Hotel Design: This 4-story building is in a highly visible location and will silhouette above the adjacent one-story, retail center. Staff recommends the significant enhancement of the architectural detailing and building finishes. The City Architect recommended design changes that have not been fully executed by the applicant due to time constraints. Consequently, staff recommends a condition requiring the designs for both buildings be brought back for a separate City Council action with recommendation from the Planning Commission. • Contribution toward Stevens Creek Boulevard Bridge Improvement• To improve pedestrian access and walkability, staff sought a contribution toward the pedestrian improvement of the Stevens Creek Boulevard bridge over Highway 85. An amount of $100,000 was sought to act as seed money toward such improvements as safety rails, pedestrian lights and bike lanes. Other projects next to bridges were required to make contributions or improvements and such improvements will principally benefit this property owner. • _Ge_neral Plan Commercial Development Allocation: Staff recommended that a discounted commercial development allocation of 18,770 square feet be applied to this 61,822-square foot, 122-room hotel because. hotels generate far less peak hour traffic than general commercial uses. A hotel allocation could not be transferred from the Cupertino Square area because of a prior development agreement. Staff noted that the City Council established a precedent by approving the 100,000 square foot Public Storage facility project with an office/industrial development allocation of 10,000 square feet. 21 -4 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 5 June 17, 2008 • Reducing the Maximum Restaurant Seating at the ShoRping Center The project contemplates constructing a 165-space underground parking podium that will not be available to customers and tenants of the rest of the shopping center. To avoid potential, futuxe parking overflow problems, staff recommended modifying the 1986 master use permit to reduce the maximum allowable restaurant seating from 800 seats to 500 seats. The center ~ currently has 310 restaurant seats. • Sustainability: Staff recommends that the applicant achieve LEED Silver certification for both buildings. Planning Commission Commenfs • Phasing: The Commission was supportive of development phasing and accepted the applicant's proposal far a 5-year expiration period (after City Council approval) on the second development phase. • Mary Avenue Landscapin /~ t Parkin Losses The Commission agreed with staff that the hotel must have a more generous rear landscaped setback from Mary Avenue or else the hotel will appear to be too massive. They objected to the loss of any Mary Avenue street parking because it is a public benefit and is highly utilized by Memorial Park and Senior Center users, De Anza College students and Flint Center attendees. In addition, it is an important parking supply for De Anna Flea Market attendees and the numerous attendees of festivals at Memorial Park. The 36 parking stalls proposed for conversion to landscaping are all in prime locations in close proximity to the activity centers. The Commission recommended that the Mary Avenue setback for the hotel be increased 20 additional feet (40 feet total) to avoid any Ioss of Mary Avenue street parking. It was left with the applicant to decide how best to accommodate the increased Mary Avenue setback. Some suggestions included shrinking the size of the hotel and/ or mixed use building and/ or reconfiguring the shape of the buildings. Another alternative offered to the applicant was the sharing of an equivalent number of parking spaces on the shopping center property to compensate for the street parking loss, but the applicant was not receptive to the idea. • Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart of the City ~ Landscaping The Commission supported the modified Heart of the City landscape improvement recommended by staff for the frontage segment between the two driveways, in lieu of improving the frontage next to the Shane Company. If the Council approves this ~1-5 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-Ob, TM-2007-09, EXG2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 6 June 17, 2008 alternative, staff recommends the applicant should provide an irrevocable offer of dedication fox the Shane Company frontage at this time. • Hotel Desi~ The Commission wanted to see enhancements on all four sides of the hotel. It also recommended that more detailed designs for both buildings be brought back for a separate City Council action with recommendation from the Planning Commission. • Contribution toward Stevens Creek Boulevard Bridge Improvement• The Commission wanted to improve the walkability across the bridge and saw potential connections between the hotel and the Bubb Road industrial park. A minority of the Commission felt the nexus for a bridge contribution was too weak. The Commission recommended a $25,000 contribution requirement toward bridge improvement, which was in Iine with other contributions .sought from other developers with projects next to bridges. • General Plan Commercial Development Allocation: The Commission did not . recommend a discounted commercial development allocation for the hotel, which means it supported a full allocation of. b1,822-square foot for the 122-room hotel. Despite the precedent set by the City Council, the Commission felt uncomfortable recommending a discounted development allocation when there was no supporting general plan policies. • Reducing the Maximum Restaurant Seating at the Shopping Center The Commission recommended modifying the 1986 master use permit (Exhibit C-1) condition tv reduce the maximum allowable restaurant seating from 800 seats to 600 seats, which was the applicant's proposal. Another condition in that master use permit allows the Commission to open up the use permit to address parking issues in the event that parking becomes a problem. • Sustainability: The Commission recommends that the applicant achieve LEED Silver certification for both buildings and requires solar heating for the swimming pool. • Landscaping The Commissioners noted that the western property boundary has several dead trees not shown as dead or not shown to be removed on the plans. The Commission recommended that the Phase 2landscaping on the west side of the mixed use building be shifted into Phase 1. This includes removal of any dead trees and their replacements in accordance with the protected tree ordinance; the substitution of native trees for the exotic tree replacements where feasible; and two field grown oaks to replace oaks previously allowed to be removed under emergency circumstances. s~-s Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard 7 June 17, 2008 Condominium Ma :The Commission recommends approval of the two lot split but had difficulty comprehending the need for the condominium plan. There were also concerns expressed about approving a condominium plan if the second phase was not built. The condo plan was approved with the stipulation that the condo lines be adjusted by the final map stage to accommodated any approved changes to the site plan. ENCLOSURES Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 6516, 6517, 6518, 6519, 6520 Exhibit A-2: Staff Reports to Planning Commission dated May 27, 2008 and June 10, 200$, including initial study, ERC recommendation and Negative Declaration Exhibit B-2: Applicant's written response to the staff report, dated June 9, 2008 Exhibit C-2: Revised Condominium plans titled Cupertino Oaks Conceptual Condominium Plan, labeled C-1 and C-2. Exhibit D-2: Revised Building Elevation titled: Marriott Residence Inn, Cupertino, CA, sheet DR-7 Exhibit E-2: Public comments Plan Set Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Director, Community Development Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager G:\Piaruung\PDREPORT\CC\U-2007-04 ASA-2007.06 TM-2007-09 EXC-200$-07 TR-2008-02 EA-2007-06 CC ReporE.doc 21-7 U-2007-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6516 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE~CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMFT TO DEMOLISH A THEATER AND 2,430 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A 4- STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,200 SQUARE-FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL, COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND MEETING/CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WI-3EREA5, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Conditional Use Permits Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 3) The proposed development is consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the 15-foot side building setback for which an exception is requested. NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps; facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for a Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2007-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 2~-s Resolution No. b516 U-2007-04 .June 10, 2008 Page 2 . 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2007-04 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan C-1 .and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 5b,194 square-foot mixed use building aver a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 100,323 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. 4. PROJECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1}, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. The second development phase shall have a use permit expiration of five years after City approval. 21-9 Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 3 5. HOTEL REAR SETBACK The rear building setback for the hotel building shall be increased to a minimum of 40 feet to accommodate significant landscaping and trees to help screen the mass of the hotel. 6. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: a. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. b. A modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewalk and planting areas between the existing trees, similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. c. Native trees substituted for the proposed. replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native aak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. d. Mary Avenue on-street parking shall not be removed other than what is needed for approved driveway cuts and abutting landscape bulbs. e. The landscape strip westerly of the proposed mixed use building shall be planted as part of the Phase 1 work. 8. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. 20-U-86) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center (file no. 20-U-8b) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 600 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 9. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building(s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. In addition, the swizn~ning pool will be heated with solar heaters. 2~ - ~o Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 4 10. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT . The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the lots. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1}, these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a}, has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; save brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 14. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $25,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. 15. PUBLIC ART T'he applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. 21 -.~~ Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 5 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY T'HE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 16. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided i.n accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 17. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 18. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 19. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 20. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 21. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ' The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking 21 - 12 Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 6 and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 *~ $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer '"* Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Otf-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c.. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein znay be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 24. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similax above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from. public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 21 - 13 Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 7 26. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 27. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDESJ CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (N41) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 28. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES {BMPJ REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 29. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan. should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 30. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 31. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles, used during _ construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 21 - 14 Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 8 32. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmentai Programs Manager. 33. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS {Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /s/Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: s /Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department G.•lPlanninglPDREPORTVZESIZ0071U-2007-04 res.doc APPROVED: / s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 21-15 ASA-2007-06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6517 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 4-STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,194 SQUARE- FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL OFFICE/MEETING & CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDIN G OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (OAKS SHOPPING CENTER) SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner iri accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Architectural ' and Site Review Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code; and 3) The proposed development is essentially consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the exception request fora 15-foot sideyard setback from the westerly property line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2007-06 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of_ May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 2~ - ~s Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2007-06 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: .21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-S, Phase Z: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan G-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building over a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general ,commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, ~cvith Late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 100,323 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. 4. PROTECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1}, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. The second development phase shall have a use permit expiration of five (5) years after City approval. 21-~~ Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 3 5. HOTEL REAR SETBACK The rear building setback for the hotel building shall be increased to a minimum of 40 feet to accommodate significant landscaping and trees to help screen the mass of the hotel. 6. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Commuxtity Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: 1. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwatex Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 2. A modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewalk and planting areas between the existing trees, similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. 3. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. 4. Mary Avenue on-street parking shall not be removed other than what is needed for approved driveway cuts and abutting landscape bulbs. 5. The landscape strip westerly of the proposed mixed use building shall be planted as part of the Phase 1 work. 8. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. _ 20.U-86) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Centex {file no. 20-U-8b) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 {Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum 21-18 Resolution No. b517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 4 number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 600 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 9. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building(s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation In addition, the swimming pool will be heated with solar heaters. 10. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the lots. 11, DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof files; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents •on major, first floor building elements, including the Lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City • Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 14. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $25,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall 21 - 19. Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 5 help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle Lanes, etc. on the bridge. 15. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. SECTION 1V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 16. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 17. CURS AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 18. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be .positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in.which the site is Located. 19. FIRE HYDRANT - Fire hydrants shall be Located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 20. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 21. DRAINAGE Drainage. shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- . development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. - 22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of 21 - 20 Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-Ob June 10, 2008 Page 6 - underground utility devices.. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits: Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 xxiinimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100%° of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 24. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 21-21 Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 7 25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices {BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 26. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 27. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM fNPDES) CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOl) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which .encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan {SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices {BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 28. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP~ REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 29. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 3Q. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian . signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 31. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used duxing 21 - 22 Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 8 construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. ' 32. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 33. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices / s/Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10+~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED; /s/Mary Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 21 - 23 Resolution No. b517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 9 G.•lAlanningV'DREPORTIRES120071AS.4-2007-06 res.doc 21 - 24 TM-2007-09 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6518 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING: APPROVAL OF A TENTATNE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN 8.1 NET ACRE SITE INTO TWO PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 2.6 AND 5.5 ACRES IN SIZE, AND APPROVAL OF A CONDOMINIUM SUBDNISION PLAN TO FURTHER SUBDIVIDE THE 2.6 ACRE LOT INTO TWO CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A COMMON AREA LOT. SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Parcel Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the subdivision and condominium plan of said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 2) That the design and irnproveinents of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. 3} That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. 4) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated there is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Parcel Map is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated ~ -ffis Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page z Resolution beginning on Page 2 thexeof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2007-09 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM-2007-09 Applicant/Owner: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on the Tentative Parcel Map titled: "Cupertino Oaks Tentative Map", consisting of four sheets labeled TM-1 through TM-4, and a condominium plan titled: "Cupertino Oaks/Conceptual Condominium Plan/First Floor" and "Basement Floor", consisting of two sheets labeled C-1 and C- 2 prepared by BKF Engineers dated 4/14/0$ and b/02/08 respectively, except as may be modified by the conditions contained in this resolution. , 2. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Protect Approval set forth herein may inciude certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d} (1}, these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 6b020(a}, has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you wilt be legally barred from Iater challenging such exactions. 3. RECORDATION OF EASEMENTS The applicant shall depict on the final subdivision map to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works, easements. for all shared utility lines, and surface storm drainage, parking, waste collection and vehicular circulation that crosses property lines. 21 - 26 Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 3 SECTION N: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications ~ shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 5. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 6. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 7. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 8. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ox Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. . 9. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 10. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 11. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checkin~ 21- Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 4 and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or. $3,540.00 minimum $ 6 % of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective. PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond:100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. . -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 12. TRANSFORMERS ' Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 21 - 28 Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 5 14. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 15. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 16. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP~ RE UIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 17. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer.' This plan should include alI erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 18. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound Ieft-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 19. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City .prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD} standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 20. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to.the satisfaction of the Environmerital Programs Manager. 21 - 29 Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 6 21. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section b6474.1$ of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /s/Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: f sJSteve Piasecki Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department G: IPlanninglPDReportlRes120071TM-2007-09.doc APPROVED: 1 s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 21 - 30 EXC-2008-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6519 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN FORA 15-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK ON A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRII''TION Application No.: EXC-2008-07 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a setback exception to the Heart 'of the City Specific Plan, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards fo this application: a} That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter wi11 resulf in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; b) That the granting of the exception will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the pubic safety, health and welfare; and c) That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification and the minimum variance to accomplish this purpose; and d} That the proposed exception will. not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan setback regulation is hereby recommended for approval subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution; and 21 - 31 Resolution No. 6519 EXC-2008-07 June 10, 2008 Page 2 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2008-07, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 10, 2008 and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS . The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, Ll through L-5, and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. HEART OF THE CITY SETBACK EXCEPTION Approval is granted for a side yard setback exception from the Heart of the City Specific Plan requirements to allow the proposed hotel and mixed use building to have a minimum 15 foot setback from the westerly property line. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESE_RVATIONS__ OR OTHE_R_ EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 6b020(d} (1}; these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Governmenf Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 6b020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 21 - 32 Resolution No. 6519 EXC-2008-07 June ?0, 2008 Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED; /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: G~zpNT/Planning/Pdreport/Res/2008/EXC-2008-07: doc 21 - 33 TR-2008-02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6520 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TREE REMOVAL REQUEST TO REMOVE AND REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 47 TREES TO CONSTRUCT A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 212b5 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the removal and replacement of about 47 trees in conjunction with the development of a hotel and mixed-use building; and WHEREAS, the 47 trees axe part of an approved landscape plan, subject to Chapter 14.18 of the Municipal Code, pertaining to Heritage and Specimen Trees; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for tree removal is hereby recommended far approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TR-2008-02, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008 are incorporated by reference herein. Zi - sa Resolution No. 6520 TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION III, CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION The applicant is approved to remove a total of about 47 trees on site in accordance with~the applicant's tree survey/removal plan identified as pages L-1 through L-5 dated either 4/15/08 or 4/17/08 in the approved plan set titled: "The Oaks Mixed- Use Project, Hyway 85 & Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA", except as may be amended by the conditions of this Resolution 2. TREE PROTECTION The City Arborist's recommendations for site design and tree protection during . project construction as articulated in his July 24, 2007 report titled: A Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed Development at the Oaks Shopping Center 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California" shall be incorporated in the building permit plan set and implemented during the course of demolition and construction of the project. 3. TREE PROTECTION BOND The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure protection of trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a letter from the City Arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition 4. TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan at the building permit. stage. The westerly landscape. strip next to the proposed mixed use building will be advanced to the phase 1 work. Native trees shall be substituted for- the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. That revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions and root barriers shall be installed to avoid conflicts with future phase 2 development. The revised plan shall be approved by the Director of Cammunity Development. For any additional trees that are removed due to hazardous conditions or are considered dead, the applicant shall be required to replace these trees in accordance with the Protected Trees Ordinance. Species and size of replacement trees shall ~be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. 5. TREE REPLACEMENT IN-LIEU FEE The applicant shall pay an in-lieu fee for any trees that cannot be replaced on site in accordance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. 21 - 35 Resolution No. 6520 TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 3 6. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d} (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a}, has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with aII of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose, Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none _ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATT~: APPROVED: _~s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development __ / s /Mar Miller Marty Miller, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission G: ~ PIanrring ~ PDREPORT~ RES ~ 20071 TR-2008-02res.doc 21 - 36 CITY OF CUPERTINO EXHIBIT A ~ ~ 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 9SQ14 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, Agenda Date: June 10,2008 EXC-2008=07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 . Applicant : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Property Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Oaks Shopping Center) APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-2007-06) to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space 'and construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION (file no. EXC-2008-07) to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/ office/ conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP (TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot. TREE REMOVAL (TR-2008-02) request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the model resolutions, make appropriate changes and recomrriend: • approval of a negative declaration for the project; and • approval of the project per the revised model resolutions Project Data: General Plan Designation: Specific Plan: . Zoning Designation: Acreage {Net): Building Area: Commercial/Residential Heart of the City Specific Plan P- Stevens Creek Boulevard Conceptual Planned Development Zoning 8.1 acres Existing Shopping Center: 73,056 sq. ft. Demo Theater (Phase 1): -15,263 sq. ft. Demo Comm 1 Space (Phase 2): - 2,430 sq. ft. 21 - 37 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-Ob, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Pale 2 of 6 122-Room Hotel (Phase 1): 61,822 sq. ft. Mixed-Use Bldg. (Phase 2): 56,194 sq. ft. Building Height: Max. Proposed Bldg. Height {Hotel) 44' 10" General Plan Maximum Height is 45 feet Stories: ~ Hotel: 4 stories; Mixed-Use Bldg: 3 stories Parking: on-grade garage podium Shared Parking Required (Phase 1}: 356 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 1): 494 stalls 410 84 Shared Parking Required (Phase 2): 417 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 2): 470 stalls 305 165 Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Zoning: Yes Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed the project on May 27, 2008 and took public testimony (Exhibit A}. Over 1,500 hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1/z mile radius of the project boundaries. The Commission received emailed (through staff) or verbal testimony from six residents. The Commissioners discussed numerous project topics and came to a general agreement on a number of them. On other topics, viewpoints were discussed, but a majority .opinion did not seem to develop. DISCUSSION: Development Phasing: The applicant has proposed a phasing of his project with the hotel to be built immediately and the mixed use building to be constructed at an indefinite latex time when the retail financing climate has improved and the applicant secures a suitable commercial tenant(s). The first phase hotel has been designed to stand alone from a site planning standpoint. A majority of the Commissioners supported a phased project. Subdivision/Condominium Plan: The applicant has proposed to subdivide the property in order to purchase the parcel on which development is proposed. Ms. Ngo stated that the condominium subdivision plan was needed to separate the financing of the hotel project from the mixed use building and the hotel lender wanted to see the hotel project on a separate legal lot(s). A majority of the Commissioners favored the two Iot division of the property, but opposed the further subdivision into four commercial condominium units. The Commissioners believe this condominium subdivision would preclude all future redevelopment opportunities on this property, which would not be in the best interests of the City. 21 - 38 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212b5 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ABA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 3 of 6 Hotel Design and Building Finishes: A majority of the Commissioners wanted an enhanced hotel design. The comments focused on the need for more detailing, better building finishes, reduce the perceived massing on the west elevation (Highway 85 side) and refer the design to City Architect Larry Cannon. Mr. Cannon had previously reviewed an earlier development plan and his comments were focused on the site planning issues, not the building design. Mr. Cannon has reviewed the plans and emailed his recommendations to staff (Exhibit B-1). His recommendations include better design integration with the rest of the shopping center by using a clay file on all roofs to match the shopping center buildings. Creating a more interesting building by defining its top with extended eaves and cave brackets on all roofs, and by defining its bottom, by extending the brick base all around the building. A further enhancement to separate the top from the bottom is a differently colored (darker) lower floors. Better building relief would be created. by insetting all of the windows and adding balcony grilles and awnings that project from the wall surfaces. The City Architect included several photos of newer Marriott Residence Inns in his comments. There was insufficient time for the applicant to make revisions to the plans and obtain approval from the hotel chain, so the design changes have been conditioned in the resolution subject to Planning Commission and City Council approval. Mary Avenue Parking and Traffic: There was 'no majority viewpoint on the conversion of 48 Mary Avenue street parking stalls to landscaping. One Commissioner was okay with the conversion, another was not in favor of the street parking loss, and another wanted to reduce the parking loss by not allowing street landscaping near the sports court and swimming pool. Staff is concerned with the visual mass of the hotel from Mary Avenue and strongly recommend an enhanced setback from the curb ~ and a significant, landscaped (trees) element, regardless of whether that setback is achieved on the property by shifting or redesigning the structure, or by moving the curbline of the street. Some other ideas have surfaced that the Commission may wish to consider: • Delete the street landscaping next to the swimming pool and sports half-court. This is not needed to visually setback the hotel project and will save approximately 12 street parking stalls. This solution has been incorporated into the model resolutions. The conversion of 36 parking stalls instead of 48 stalls may be more acceptable to Commission. Shift the hote120 feet forward (south). With some redesign, the hotel will have a visually adequate rear setback and the Mary Avenue parking space conversion to 21 - 39 [Ise Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd ' U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 4 of 6 _ landscaping will not be needed. This shift will xeduce the phase 2 building pad and resultant building size. • To offset the loss of street parking, require the property owner to share an equivalent number of private on-site parking stalls on those days when there are festivals at Memorial Park. . The Commission questioned whether the parking Loss could be compensated by the creation of diagonal parking on the north side of Mary Avenue, in lieu of the existing parallel parking. Public Works staff was consulted on the question and indicated there was probably adequate right-of-way width to accommodate the change, but it was not a desirable alternative. Public Works is expecting a significant increase in bicycle traffic once the Mary Avenue Bicycle/Ped Bridge is open and diagonal parking does not function well with higher bicyclist flows. It may be possible to add more parallel parking along Mary Avenue. One commissioner had a ~ question about the "No U-turn' prohibition on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard at Bubb Road. According to Public Works the prohibition was added to create additional traffic capacity for right turn movements from Bubb Road to Stevens Creek Boulevard. In this location there is a high demand for traffic capacity between the West Valley Industrial Park and the Highway 85 on-ramps. Motorists have the ability to make U-turns at the west end of the Highway 85~ bridge before reaching Bubb Road. Heart of the City Specific Plan Side Setback Exception: ~ ' All of the Commissioners were okay with a 15-foot side setback for the hotel and mixed use building on the west (Highway 85) side of the property. An approval resolution is in the report. Location of the Heart of the City Landscape Improvements on Stevens Creek Boulevard: There did not seem to be a majority opinion on the extent of the Stevens Creek Boulevard landscape improvements as required by the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Two Commissioners favored shifting the improvement work between the ~ two driveways, instead of the segment nearest Mary Avenue. Staff has conditioned the approval providing a full street improvement as required by ~ the Heart of the City Specific Plan between Mary Avenue and the westerly driveway. A schematic of the improvement will be provided at the hearing. Highway 85 Bridge Improvements: The Commissioners had mixed feelings about this suggested development condition that would require the applicant to contribute funds toward the improvement of the abutting Stevens Creek Boulevard bridge that crosses over Highway 85. The recommended $100,000 contribution would provide seed money for enhanced 21 - 40 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal foz 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 5 of 6 pedestrian improvements, such as, safety railings, lights, bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. Some Commissioners did not see a nexus, another wanted to see pedestrian improvements and others noted that contributions were required of three other developers for different bridges {Stelling Road Bridge over Highway 280 and De Anza Blvd. Bridge over Highway 280) and the amount was debatable. A condition was added to the use permit and ASA resolutions and should be reviewed and discussed by the Commission. Tree Removal: There was a consensus among the Commissioners to recommend approval of the tree removal request provided that native. trees are substituted for the proposed ornamental replacement trees to the extent possible and two field-grown oaks are planted on the property to replace two previous specimen oak tree removals allowed by the City. Sustainable Building Practices: Commissioners had different ideas on haw sustainable building practices should be implemented by this project. Since the City is still formulating a strategy for sustainability, staff feels it would be best to require the applicant to achieve a LEED Silver certification for the buildings and let the applicant decide which practices to implement to achieve that standing. General Plan Development Allocation: The Commissioners had mixed feelings about recommending a discounted commercial development allocation for the hotel portion of the project. The General Pian recogzuzes the wide disparity in peak hour traffic generation by hotels {0.4 trips/room) versus general commercial (2.6 trips/1,000 square feet) and thus treats these commercial uses differently in the development allocation tables. The 61,$22 square-foot, 122-room hotel generates as much peak hour traffic as 18,770 square feet of general commercial space. Presently, the General Plan assigns a hotel development allocation only to the Vallco Planning Area (Cupertino Square}, which cannot be transferred away because of the existing development agreement. Staff recommends a discounted development allocation for just the hotel (18,770 square feet). The hotel cannot be converted in the future to a more traffic-intensive commercial use without use permit approval, at which time the Commission can deduct an additional allocation for any intensification. Reduction in Allowed Number of Restaurant Seats in the Shopping Center: The Commissioners should confirm that they are agreeable with reducing the maximum allowable restaurant seating at the shopping center from 800 seats to 500 seats ~as articulated in the 1986 master use permit for the shopping center (Exhibit C-1}.. The completion of the second phase would provide fora 165-car underground garage 21- 1 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 2165 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-Ob, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page b of 6 that the applicant has stated would be unavailable to the customers and employees of the rest of the shopping center. Currently, the shopping center has 310 restaurant seats. Any new restaurants Located in the mixed-use building should, have access to the parking spaces in the garage. Public Comments: Four residents spoke at the May 27~ meeting. One resident thought the buildings were too massive for the area and was concerned with the Loss of the view of the mountains from Mary Avenue. She supported planting native trees and shrubs on the property. A second resident said the City shouldn't put people next to the freeways because of the increased air pollution levels from vehicles, which increases the chances for health problems. A third resident said the site was overbuilt and the hotel. needed a lot of redesign work. Additional traffic was a concern, especially with the growth of enrollment at De Anza College. Another resident supported the project and thought it was good idea to demolish the vacant theater that is benefiting no one. The attached email message was received by staff after the first hearing. (Exhibit D-1). ENCLOSURES: Model Resolutions Exhibit A-1: Planning Commission staff report with attachments dated May 27, 2008 Exhibit B-1: City Architect Hotel Design Recommendations Exhibit C-1: City Council Action Letter for file no. 20-U-86 Exhibit D-1: Emailed public comments Plan Set Submitted by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme G: Planning/PDReport/pcUreports/2007ureports/ U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 pc2.doc 21 - 42 U-2007-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A THEATER AND 2,430 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A 4- STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,200 SQUARE-FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL, COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND MEETING/CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1} The proposed use, at the proposed location, will .not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a mannex in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Conditional Use Permits Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 3) The proposed development is consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the 15-foot side building setback for which an exception is requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for a Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2007-04 as set forth u1 the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27 -43 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 2 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. . SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2007-04 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHISiTS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building over a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 74,964 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel _ and a 5b,194 square-foot mixed use building. The building area of the hotel, 61,822 square feet, has been discounted to 18,770 square feet of general commercial allocation based on a peak hour traffic trip equivalency. 4. PROTECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and. their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1), except as may be amended by the conditions contaianed in this resolution. 21 - 44 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 3 5. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 6. LANDSCAPE PLAN ' The applicant ~ shall submit detailed Landscape and irrigation plans to- be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building pexmits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: a. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. b. Full Heart of the City Specific Plan landscape and sidewalk (paver) improvements between Mary Avenue and the row of parking fronting on Stevens Creek Boulevard; and a modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewall and planting areas between the existing trees similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. c. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plait shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. d. Mary Avenue landscape improvements fronting the pool and half sport court shall be deleted. Mary Avenue on-street parking removal due to landscape improvements and driveway cuts shall be up to 36 parking stalls. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining these Mary Avenue street trees. 7. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. 20-U-86) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center (file no. 20-U-86) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 500 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. S. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building(s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. 21 - 45 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 20, 2008 Page 4 9. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the lots. 10. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 11. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Goverment Code Section 66020(d) {1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications; reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. IZ. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 13. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $100,000 towaxd the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc, on the bridge. 14. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. 2~-as Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 5 SECTION TV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE- PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 15. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as.specified by the City Engineer. 17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer.. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other- forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 1$. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 19. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 21. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 22. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under 21 - 47 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 6 grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection. Fees: b, Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6 % of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,aoo.oo $ 2,092.79 $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100 % of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. ~L.abor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100 % of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council: However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 23. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 24. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 2~-aa Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 7 25. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City alI waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 26. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES} CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan {SWPPP}, use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 27. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design,. source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance- Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 28. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 29. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 30. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic .Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for alI signage and striping work throughout the City. 21 - 49 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 8 31. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed fo the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 32. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 6b474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices / s /Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: 1PlanninglPDREPOR71RES120071 U-2007-04 res.doc 21 - 50 ASA-2007-06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE .CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 4-STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,194 SQUARE- FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL OFFICE/MEETING & CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDIN G OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (OAKS SHOPPING CENTER) SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2} The proposed use will be located and conducted i_n a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Architectural and Site Review Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code; and 3} The proposed development is essentially consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the exception request fora 15-foot sideyard setback from the westerly property line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2007-06 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 21 - 51 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2007-06 Applicant: ~ Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance G1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building over a parking podium.. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 74,964 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. The building area of the hotel, 61,822 square feet, has been discounted to 18,770 square feet of general commercial allocation based on a peak hour traffic trip equivalency. 4. PROJECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1}, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 5. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities fox the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 21 - 52 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 3 6. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: 1. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.1$, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 2. Full Heart of the City Specific Plan landscape and sidewalk (paver) improvements between Mary Avenue and the xow of parking fronting on Stevens Creek Boulevard; and a modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewallc and planting areas between the existing trees similar in . design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. 3. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised Landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. 4. Mary Avenue landscape improvements fronting the pool and half sport court shall be deleted. Mary Avenue on-street parking removal due to landscape zmprovements and driveway cuts shall be up to 36 parking stalls. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining these Mary Avenue street trees. 7. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. 20-U-86) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center (file rio. 20-U-$b) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 500 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 8. GREEN BUILDING. At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building(s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. 9. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance. agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the lots. 21 - 53 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 4 10. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final dem_ olition permits. 11. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS ~. The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020{d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 12. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minunum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from~the Planning Commission. 13. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $100,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. 14. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. SECTION 1V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 15. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 2~ -sa Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 5 16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 18. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 19. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 21. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 22. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 6 % of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum 21 - 55 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 6 b. Grading Permit: $ b % of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 2,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 2,092.79 e. Power Cost: ** f. Map Checking Fees: $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer *'F Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100 % of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may. be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 23. TRANSFORMERS . Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipmenf enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 24. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 25. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES . The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 21 - 56 Resolution No. ASA-2007-Ob June 10, 2008 Page 7 26. NATIONAL POLLUTANT .DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP}, use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 27. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP} REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMI''s, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 28. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 29. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal Beads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 30. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 31. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 21 - 57 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 8 32. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed developrnent. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section (6474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works . City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: IPlanninglPDREPOR71RES120071ASi1-2007-06 res.doc 21 - 58 EXC-2008-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN FORA 15-FOOT SIDE. YARD SETBACK ON A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION L• PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2008-07 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a setback exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following ~ with regards to this application: a) That the Literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; b) That the granting of the exception will not be_ injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the pubic safety, health and welfare; and c) That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification and the minimum variance to accomplish this purpose; and d) That .the proposed exception will not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan setback regulation is hereby recommended for approval subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution; and 21 - 59 Resolution No. Page 2 EXC-2008-07 June 10, 2008 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2008-07, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 10, 2008 and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINTSTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Z. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: G1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. HEART OF THE CITY SETBACK EXCEPTION Approval is granted for a side yard setback exception from the Heart of the City Specific Plan requirements to allow the proposed hotel and mixed use building to have a minimum 15 foot setback from the westerly property line. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirerr~ents, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that t11e 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 2~ - so Resolution No. EXC-2008-07 june 10, 2008 Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED Phis 30th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development G:CupNT/Planning/Pdreport/Res/2008/EXC-2008-07.doc APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 21-61 TM-2007-09 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California ~ 95014 RESOLUTION NO OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING: APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN 8.1 NET ACRE SITE INTO TWO PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 2.6 AND 5.5 ACRES IN SIZE, AND DENIAL OF A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION PLAN TO FURTHER SUBDNIDE THE 2.6 ACRE LOT INTO FOUR CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A COMMON AREA LOT. SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Parcel Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance ~of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and . WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the two-lot subdivision portion of said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed two-lot subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 2} That the design and improvements of the proposed two-lot subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. 3} That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. 4) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildli#e or their habitat. 5) That the design of the two-lot subdivision or the type of improvements associated there is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict wifh easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, the Commission does not support the further subdivision of Parcel 1 (2.6 acres) into four commercial condominium units and a common area parcel in that the condominium plan would likely hamper all future redevelopment opportunities on the properties that may be of interest to the City. z~ - s2 Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Parcel Map is hereby partially recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2007-09 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION . Application No.: TM-2007-09 Applicant/Owner: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on the Tentative Parcel Map titled: "Cupertino Oaks Tentative Map", consisting of four sheets labeled TM-1 through TM-4, prepared by BKF Engineers dated 4/14/08. The phrase: "(FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) is stricken from -Sheet TM-2, except as may be modified by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEMOLITION RE UIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, arid other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section b6020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions, You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 21 - 63 Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 3 3. RECORDATION OF EASEMENTS The applicant shall depict on the final subdivision map to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Directox of Public Works, easements for all shared utility Lines, and surface storm drainage, parking, waste .collection and vehicular circulation that crosses property lines. 4. CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION PLAN The condominium subdivision plan depicted in Condo Plan Sheets labeled C-1 and C-2 and referenced in Sheet TM-2 is not approved. SECTION 1V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 6. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 7. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 8. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 9. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 10. DRAINAGE Drainage shah be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 2~ -sa Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 4 11. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 12. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under . grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. POWer COSt: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100 % of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond:100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said. change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 21 - 65 Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 5 13. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 14. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (B1VIPs}, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 15. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 16. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of lntent (NOl) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan {SWPPP}, use of construction Best Management Practices {BMPs) to.contxol storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 17. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP~ REQUIREMENTS . The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 18. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The .developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include alI erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 19. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 21 - 66 Resolution No ~ TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 6 20. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan~for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 21. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 22. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 of the Cali#ornia Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section lV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices / s /Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 z~ - s~ Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 7 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: 1PlanninglPDReportlRes 120071TM-2007-09. doc 21 - 68 TR-2008-02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TREE REMOVAL REQUEST TO REMOVE- AND REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 47 TREES TO CONSTRUCT A HOTEL AND MDCED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application far the removal and replacement of about 47 trees in conjunction with the development of a hotel and mixed-use building; and WHEREAS, the 47 trees are part of an approved landscape plan, subject to Chapter 14.18 of the Municipal Code, pertaining to Heritage and Specimen Trees; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for tree removal is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TR-2008-02, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 200$ and June 10, 2008 are incorporated by reference herein. 21 - 69 Resolution No. TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION The applicant is approved to remove a total of about 47 trees on site in accordance with the applicant's tree survey/removal plan identified as pages L-2 through L-5 dated either 4/25/08 or 4/17/08 in fhe approved plan set titled: "The Oaks Mixed- Use Project, Hyway 85 & Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA"; except as may be amended by the conditions of this Resolution. 2. TREE PROTECTION The City Arborist's recommendations for site design and tree protection during project construction as articulated in his July 24, 2007 report titled: A Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed Development at the Oaks Shopping Center 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California" shall be incorporated in the building permit plan set and implemented during the course of demolition and construction of the project. 3. TREE PROTECTION BOND The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure protection of trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a Letter from the City Arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition. 4. TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan at the building permit stage, substituting native trees for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. That revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two Large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. The revised plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. For any additional trees that are removed due to hazardous conditions or are considered dead, the applicant shall be required to replace these trees in accordance with the Protected Trees Ordinance. Species and size of replacement trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. 5. TREE REPLACEMENT IN-LIEU FEE The applicant shall pay an in-lieu fee for any trees that cannot be replaced on site in accordance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuaznt ~ Government Code Section 66020(d} (2}, these Conditions constitute written notice of Resolution No. TR-2008-02 . - June 10, 2008 Page 3 a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission G: `Planning ~ PDREPORT~RES ~ 2007`TR-2008-02res.doc 21.- 71 ~~iT A --1 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 - - DEPAR'I'MENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-0b, TM-2007-09, Agenda Date: May 27, 2008 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-Ob Applicant : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Property Location: 212b5 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Oaks Shopping Center) APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-2007-Ob) to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/confexence center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION (file no, EXC-2008-07) to the Heart of the .City Specific Plan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 5b,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP (TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot. TREE REMOVAL (TR-2008-02) request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the project, provide direction to staff and continue the project for 30 days to give the applicant sufficient time to address City concerns including: 1) Modify or eliminate the commercial condominium subdivision to address building/fire code issues; 2) Modify landscape and improvement plans to depict Stevens Creek Boulevard Heart of the City Specific PIan landscape improvements or a satisfactory modification; 3) Eliminate development phasing, and commit to building the two buildings at the same time, or shift hotel project to Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage; and 4) Re-refer architectural plans to City Architect, Larry Cannon, for recommendations to significantly enhance the architectural detailing and 21 - 72 Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~ ._ wrap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212_: Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 2 of 8 building finishes of the hotel to be comparable with the planned mixed-use building. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Specific Plan: Zoning Designation: Acreage (Net): Building Area: Commercial/ Residential Heart of the City Specific Plan P- Stevens Creek Boulevard Conceptual Planned Development Zoning 8.1 acres Existing Shopping Center: 73,056 sq. ft. Demo Theater (Phase 1): -15,263 sq. ft. Demo Comm'1 Space (Phase 2): - 2,430 sq. ft. 122-Room Hotel (Phase 1): 61,822 sq. ft. Mixed-Use Bldg. (Phase 2): 56,194 sq. ft. Building Height: Max. Proposed Bldg. Height (Hotel) 44' 10" General Plan Maximum Height is 45 feet Stories: Hotel: 4 stories; Mixed-Use Bldg: 3 stories Parking: Shared Parking Required (Phase 1): 356 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 1}: 494 stalls Shared Parking Required (Phase 2): 417 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 2}: 470 stalls on-grade image podium 410 84 305 165 Zoning. Yes Project Consistency with: General Plan Yes Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: SITE DESCRII'TTON: The project site is located on the west side of the Oaks Shopping Center where there is a parking lot, a vacant theater and an occupied commercial space. It is bordered on the west by the Highway 85 on-ramp, an apartment complex to the north across Mary Avenue, the shopping center to the east, and De Anza Community College to the south across Stevens Creek Boulevard. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Karen Ngo, of Sand Hill Properties, is representing the property owner Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale- Holding LLC, the owners of the Oak Shopping Center. The project is split into two development phases by the applicant. The first phase involves the demolition of the vacant theater building and the construction of a 122--room, 4-story hotel over a parking podium at the northwest corner of the property with some site improvements. 21 - 73 Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~ _, iVlap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212,. Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 3 of 8 The second phase involves the demolition of a portion of a commercial building (2,430 square feet) and the development of a 3-story, mixed-use building with retail commercial uses on the ground floor, commercial office uses on the second floor and a conference center on the third floor, over a parking podium at the southwest corner of the property. The applicant proposes to acquire the subdivided hotel lot and construct the hotel in Phase 1. Phase 2 would not be built until the retail environment improves sufficiently to make this building economically feasible. Site improvements have been phased to ensure the continuity of the vehicular circulation and the adequacy of the parking facilities for the existing shopping center tenants and the proposed hotel between the first and second development phases. DISCUSSION: General Plan Development Allocation: There is no separate, dedicated allocation of hotel rooms in the "Heart of the City" commercial center. Since the hotel is considered a commercial use. The square footage can be allocated from the Heart of the City commercial allocation. This also applies to the mixed-use building (retail commercial/commercial office/conference center), where all uses are commercial. The total net development allocation will be approximately 100,323 square feet (subtracting the demolished building areas), leaving a general plan development allocation balance of 124,967 square feet. The Planning Commission may wish to consider a reduced commercial development allocatian for the hotel since hotels generate far fewer peak hour trips than the standard commercial building and are very unlikely to be converted to a mare intensive use. The City Council took such an action in its approval of a new Public Storage facility, which was approved for an additional net new 101,363 square feet of warehousing. The office/industrial development allocation assigned to the Public Storage application was just 10,000 square feet. Staff estimates the commercial allocation for a hotel project could be reduced to 18,770 square feet based on equivalent peak hour traffic generation. ~ . Traffic & Circulation: A transportation impact analysis was prepared for this project by Republic 1TS under contract with the City (Exhibit A). The study evaluated alI signalized intersections on Stevens Creek Boulevard between Bubb Road and Bandley Drive, and the intersections at N. Stelling Road and Greenleaf Drive, and S. Stelling Road and McClellan Road. The study took into account existing traffic levels, project traffic generation and traffic generation from projects that have been approved but not built yet. 2~ - ~a Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~ _ iVlap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212,.. Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2Q08-07, TR-2008-02 May 27; 2008 Page 4 of 8 ,,_ The analyzed project was slightly larger than the proposed project, so the results may be slightly overstated. The study found no significant impacts on freeway operations. All studied intersections continued to operate at traffic level of service (LOS) D or better at peak hours, except Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Rd., which was already at E+ LOS during the evening peak. The project contributed an insignificant degradation to the LOS of this intersection. The study identified one needed operational improvement to the street. The study xecommended that the left turn pocket on Stevens Creek Boulevard at Mary Avenue be extended from 200 to 300 feet with an increase in green signal time for the turning movemenf. The Public Works Department identified parking lot circulation improvements that are proposed in the Phase 2 work. They include reconfigured or widen driveways and re- angled parking stalls. Parking: Since 1973, the City has allowed, through the use permit process, for the Oaks Shopping Center to function with a parking deficit of 93 spaces. Overflow of center parking has been a concern, but not an issue because of the shared parking lot, the mixture of commercial tenants with different peak parking demands, and the presence of convenient, on-street Mary Avenue parking. In addition, a number of parking intensive uses were replaced with less parking intensive tenants (e.g. The Shane Company, a jewelry store, replaced the Pacific, Fresh Restaurant). The applicant is proposing a parking plan of both below grade and surface parking stalls to meet the full parking amount required by City ordinance under Table 19.100.040-C, which takes into account the sharing of parking for mixed-use developments with common parking lots. . Oaks Center Development: Aggregated Parking Data* Phase Existing New Use Shared Total Parking Parking Demand Parking Parking Supply Supply Re t. Su 1 Gara a At Grade 1 288 stalls 122 hotel 356 stalls 494 84 410 2 387 stalls+ 147 (mixed 417 stalls 470 165 305 use} * Empty tenant spaces are assumed to be parked at the general commercial ratio - one stall per 250 gross square feet . + Assumes hotel is built and occupied before Phase 2 commences. 21 - 75 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative -Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212b., Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 5 of 8 Based on the data above, an oversupply of 13$ parking spaces is proposed in Phase 1, which diminishes to 53 parking spaces at the end of Phase 2. Note that the plans show the conversion of about ~48 on-street Mary Avenue parking stalls to landscaping or driveway cuts (See Street Improvement Discussion). These spaces are not needed by the proposed project. The conversion increases the building setback and landscaping from the curb, which significantly enhances the planned hotel development. Also, unlike the existing situation, where all of the shopping center parking is available to all customers and employees, the applicant is planning to restrict the underground parking garage to employees and guests of the hotel and new mixed use building. Even though there is adequate parking for the uses, there will be Less shared parking supply when peak parking demand fluctuates among the different uses. Staff feels it would be prudent to modify the shopping center use permit (file no. 20-U-86), condition no. 3 which allows the center to have a maximum of 800 restaurant seats without need for use permit review. Currently the shopping center has 310 restaurant seats. Staff proposes dropping the number to a maximum of 500 restaurant seats, which allows for current businesses and growth. Subdivision: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 8.1 acre property into two lots for the purposes of buying the hotel lot and developing the hotel immediately. This lot, Parcel 1, is proposed to be subdivided further into four commercial condominium lots and a common area parcel. The condominium plan provides for two above ground lots that would conform to the building envelopes of the hotel and mixed use building, and two underground lots. that conform to the envelopes of the below-grade parking structure. Staff has no issue with the two•-lot split, but the condominium plan as presented introduces building code/property line issues that render construction infeasible. The tentative map application needs to be continued to give the applicant time to rethink the subdivision concept and address building/fire code issues. Subdivision Easements: Where utility Imes, storm drainage, vehicular movements and parking cross proposed property lines, easements should be recorded. These needed easements -are not shown on the tentative map.• A condition will be placed in the tentative map resolution to record such easements on the final subdivision map after building/fire code issues are addressed. 21 - 76 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212~~. Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-OR, EXC-200$-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Paee 6 of 8 Street Improvements: Stevens Creek Boulevard-Heart of the Cit,~Landscape Improvements. The Heart of the City Specific Plan requires landscape and sidewalk improvements along Stevens Creek Boulevard when site redevelopment increases building square footage by 25% or more, as is the case with the proposed project. The ideal improvement called out by the specific plan is a 10-foot wide curbside landscape strip, a six-foot wide sidewalk, follow by another 10-foot wide landscape strip. Along retail street frontages, a single row of street trees is required. Site conditions vary along the Oaks Shopping Center Stevens Creek Boulevard street frontage. Where current site conditions prohibit the ideal street improvement, the specific plan allows a modified, transitional improvement until such time the full improvements can be executed. The applicant has declined to install such landscape improvements across the majority of the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage. On plan set sheet TM-3, the ideal landscape improvement is depicted between the eastern driveway and Mary Avenue. This improvement could be extended westerly past the large oak tree, but this improvement extension was not offered by the applicant. The western reach between the western driveway and the Highway 85 on-ramp cannot be improved. Right-of-way modifications are under the jurisdiction of CALTRANS, which has numerous traffic improvements in this area. The agency would be unlikely to allow any new trees that might obscure motorist views or sidewalk modifications in proximity to its traffic control infrastructure. The majority of the Stevens Creek street frontage consists of a narrow sidewalk/landscape strip between the curb and parking row. This width is too narrow to accommodate the ideal 26-foot wide landscape improvement, but a modified transitional improvement is possible. Staff recommends an undulating sidewalk pattern where tree wells are cut into the existing monolithic sidewalk and new sections of sidewalk are constructed between the existing trees. Staff will present a graphic of this concept at the hearing to demonstrate how this would work. Staff suggested such a landscape improvement to the applicant who declined to provide it. Mary Avenue Street/Landscape Improvements. Staff is concerned with the visual mass of the hotel, which would be setback a minimum . of 20 feet+ from the property line. The applicant is proposing the conversion of about 48 street parking stalls on Mary Avenue to a landscape area. The purpose is to soften the appearance of the hotel from Mary Avenue by visually increasing its setback from the street and increasing the landscape quantities. The Public Works Department does not have any issues with the conversion of the parking stalls to landscaped area. 2~ -n Use Permit, ASA, TentativC Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212x, Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 7 of 9 Highway 85 Bridge Improvements. Any development approval should be conditioned with a financial contribution toward Highway $5 bridge improvements on one side -- a minimum of pedestrian railings and lights. The previous applicant for a development on the site, Regis Homes, agreed to contribute $100,000. Trees: An arborist report was prepared by City Arborist, David Babby (Exhibit B}, to identify existing trees in proximity to the development. The applicant is proposing the removal of 47 trees and replacing them with 67 trees to mitigate that loss. The City Arborist reviewed an earlier development plan that call for more tree removal. Plans were subsequently revised, which reduced the tree removal request to 47 trees of nine different species in the project vicinity (See Sheet L1 of plan set). None of the signature Coast Live Oak Trees on the property are proposed for removal. The composition of trees in the tree removal request are as follows: 10 Monterey Pines, 12" - 23" in diameter 1 Eucalyptus 13.5" in diameter 1 Raywood Ash 12.5" in diameter 15 Shamel Ash, 4"- 25" in diameter 1 Pittosporum, 6" - 8" in diameter cluster 1 Tree of Heaven, 2" - 4" in diameter cluster 1 Holly Oak 13.5" diameter 15 Chinese Pistache, 4" - 20.5" in diameter 2 Evergreen Pear, 8.5" -11.5" in diameter 47 Total Proposed fox Removal Staff's objectives were first to preserve the native oak trees, then as many of the larger trees on the western property line where they could serve as an effective visual screen for the two buildings. Unfortunately, many of these trees are Monterey Pines in poor health. There were two major oaks that were removed because death and a hazardous condition, but not yet_replaced. Both should be replaced with field grown oaks. Site Design, Setback & Architecture: The new buildings have been integrated into the design of the center with the building frontages addressing the rest of the shopping center. The westerly driveway runs along the east side of the buildings. The mixed use building serves as the terminus of the east-west pedestrian pa eo, which has been widen to conform to the width of the rest of the paseo. With the new developments, a new north-south pedestrian walkway will be created, connecting Mary Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard. The number of 2~ - ~a Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212b„ Stevens Creek Blvd U-20D7-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 8 of 9 driveways were Limited and connected to the proposed hotel. A joint service yard area is proposed to serve both buildings. An exception is proposed for the sideyard setback facing the Highway 85 on-ramp. Fifteen feet is proposed where 18 feet is required (half of the building wall height). A reduction in side setback here would not have any impacts and the proposed 15 feet is wide enough to protect the existing west boundary trees. The architecture of the mixed use building is satisfactory to staff; however, more should be done with the hotel. The building articulation is fine, but more can be done with the building finishes and architectural detailing to enhance the appearance of the building. This building will be highly visible with a sweeping vista from both Mary Avenue and Highway 280. Staff recommends that the plans be re-referred to the City Architect, Larry Cannon, for additional design details. Development Phasing: Staff is concerned that if the development of this project is phased, the second phase mixed use building will likely not be built, leaving a "hole" in the development pattern of the shopping center. The previously identified building code/ property line issues, differing property ownerships, the rising cost of site and street improvements could hinder Phase 2 development. Staff does not support the development phasing request. If the Commission feels differently, staff recommends that the buildings be flipped with the first phase hotel shifted toward the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage. Staff feels the development of the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage should be prioritized to frame the street, provide a gateway building for the Heart of the City and stimulate economic activity in the shopping center and along the boulevard, Public Noticing/Comments: Mailed noticing for the public hearing was a 1/2 mile radius. In addition, staff was interviewed for a news article about the project that appeared in the Cupertino Courier. Two ernaiLs commenting on the project are attached (Exhibit C). ENCLOSURES: Model Resolutions Initial Study, ERC Minutes, ERC Recommendation Exhibit A: Traffic Impact Analysis Letter Report Proposed Redevelopment of the the Oaks, Cupertino, dated October 18, 2007 by Republic ITS Exhibit B: A Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed Development at the Oaks Shopping Center, 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California dated July 24, 2007 by Arbor Resources Exhibit C: Emailed public comments Plan Set 21 - 79 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 2121,,; Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 9 of 9 Submitted by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner ~..~ __.~ Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development --~ G: P1aiululg/PDReport/pcUreports/2007ureports/ U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 pc.doc _ 21 - 80 CUPEI~TINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Title:~ Project Location: Project Descripti~ ,, . City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408} 777-3251 FAX (408} 777-3333 elopment Department File No. Fa ~ ~U~7- c .e File No.~-2bn`I'~~ ~cttments ~T~-Zad?~~ ~ . >~-Za0$1i5 .u . 2 ~}3 ~r 122- c - .S ~, G 2 ~ ~ iv,nr.~ si}~ t r~.~ov~rn --~ ~-- --- - -ti~ 1 ~_. o-~ CerhMesf av~ ~rc~:c r~v~d c~ ~~ ~I ~ ~~~hw PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area ac.) - ~ ° ~ Building Coverage - Z~ - 2. % F~cist. Building - ~~~ .f. roposed 1 ~ -1~ Bldg. - ~6 ' D s.f. Zone -~_ G.P. Designation - _~ ~~. P,rC~ t}~C~ (~,eS I cLehA i~ -~-~ I Assessor's Parcel No. - ~~ `Z`j ~.5- If Residential, UnitslGross Acre - ~1 ~ ir3 Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type.#4 Unit Type #5 Total# RentallOwn Bdrms Total s.f. Price Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) ^ Monta Vista Design Guidelines ^ ^ N. De Anza Conceptual ^ JSj Ste~~v~e~sLCr~lv1d~Conce tual r- y T C ~~ .a ~GIT1 ~ ~ 1~, if Non-Residential, Building Area - 9 n s. EmployeeslShift - Parking Required 1: 35, 2; LIt~J Project Site is Within Cuper#ino Urban Service Area - S. De Anna Conceptual S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape f. FAR - 70 Max. N/~ ~ Parking Provided is '-~R~ YES ~ 2"N0~7~^ 21 - 81 A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1. Land Use Element 2. Public Safety Element 3. Housing Element 4. Transportation Element 5. Environmental Resources 6. Appendx A Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgefine Policy 10. Constraint Maps B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation oMinance 778 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geoiogicai Report (site specific) ` 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific-Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance C. CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept.• 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupertino Water Utility D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities` Planning Departments 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 27. County Parks and Recreation Departrrsent 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. 1=remont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fre Department 33. County Sheriff . 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Fiood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 40. CountyHazardous Waste Management Plan 41. County Heritage Resources inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CaIEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site F. OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan SetlApplication Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience w/project of similar scope/characteristfa 47. ABAG Projection Series A. Complete all information requested on th~ Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY .WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the lnitiaf Study Source List; use the materials Listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source° column next to the question to which they relate. D. if you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer Geariy (Example "N - 3 Histaricai") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each page. F. Upon completing the checkist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. - G. Please attach the following materials befiore submitting the Initial Study to the City. /Project Plan Set of Legislative Document /Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) 21 - 82 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: >'~ 10 ~ V ~_ ~~*~ •C ~ ~ L Rey ~. ~ ~ ISSUES: S c ._. ~ c a H .- ._ a, Q ~ a ~ = y .= o, ~ o {0 Z Q E ources] [and Supporting Information ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ G. V3 C J N --~ N I. AESTHETICS --Would the project: a} Have a substantial adverse effect on a ^ ^ scenic vista? (5,9,24,41,44] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ^ ^ ^ ~ including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (5,9,11,24,34,41,44] - c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ^ ^ ^ character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [1,17,19,44] d} Create a new source of substantial light or ^ ^ ^ ~ = glare, which would adversely affect day or . nighttime views in the area? [1,.16,44] • il. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural ' resources are significant environmental effects, lead agenaes may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a} Convert Prime Farmland, Unique ^ ^ ^ 1~ Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland}, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Cal'~fornia Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5,7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for ^ ^ ^ ~ agrir.~Itural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [5,7,23] . c) Involve other changes in the existing. ^ ^ ^ ~, environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] ~~-a~ ~, ~., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..' o c ~ ~ o ~ ~~~' c '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ISSUES: jand Supporting Information Sources] ~ :~ ~~ ~ as ~ E- o ~ ~n~~a~? ~ as = ~ }- ~a N~a. ~ c~ ~ ova za ~ a us ~ 'cn ~ c -~ rn III.~AIR QUALITY -Where available, the signif:canoe criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ^ ^ ~1 ^ the applicable air quality plan? j5,37,42,44] b) Volate any air quality standard or ^ ^ ~ ^ . I contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] , . c} Result in a cumulatively considerable net ^ ^ ~ :.^ . increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions • which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] ~ . d} Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ^ ^ ~I • . ^ pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] ~ . e} Create objectionable odors affecting a ^ ^ ~ ~ ~Q substantial number of peop{e? [4,37,44] IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --Would the project: : ~` .. . a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ^ ^ ^ ~- directly or through habitat modifications, on any species ident~ed as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect an any ^ ^ ^ ~. riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish,and Game or I US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ^ ^ ^ ~ federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Glean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal - ~ ~ w ` ~ v ~ ~ O ~ HE s Rf ~ ~.+ sv~ w ~ ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] • ve a m~ c m ~ w a ~n~3cfa ~ e~ = ~ i ~_°- m ~ m o z~ E , pool, coastal, etc,) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other • means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement O ^ _ ~ of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12, 21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or ~ ^ ^ ~, ~ ^ ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,12,41] f} Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural ^ ^ ^ - ~ Community Conservation Plan, or other - • - approved focal, regional, or state habitat - conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the - project: -• a} Cause a substantial adverse change in ^ ^ ^ ~ =~ the signficance of a historical resource as ~ defined in §15064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in ^ ^ ^ ~ ~ the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41] ° c} Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ^ ^ ^ ~ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including ^ ^ ^ - ~ those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,5] Vl. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: - a} Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ^ O ^ ^ delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo ' Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the - 21 - 85 I ~ ~, ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .., o ~ ~ o i H o ~ .~• ~ ~ .~ ~ H ~• ~ ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] ~ a c a: ~ ~~~ '~ 'c "~ °' o ~ m :*- ~ H= E ~, m _ c Z E _ o a cn ~ ~ m ~ c ..i cry State Geologist for the area or based on other substanfiaf evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] - ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ^ ^ ~ ^ [2 5,10,44] . iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ^ ^ ^ liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv} Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44] ^ ^ ^ ~ b) Result in substantial soil erosion ar the ^ ^ ^ ~ loss of topsoil? [2,5,90,44] c} Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ^ ^ ^ ~~~~ (unstable, or that would became unstable as - f a result of the project, and potentially result f in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? . ~ [2,5,10,39] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ^ ^ ^ in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to fife or property? [2,5,10] - e) Have soils incapable of adequately ^ ^ ^ - ~. supporting the use of septic tanks or alterna#ive waste water disposal systems where. sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39] Vll. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -Would the project: a) Create a signifcan# hazard to the public or ~ ^ ^ ^ ~l the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or ^ ^ ^ the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials ~ into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ^ ^ ^ ~. hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile 21 - 86 ~~v ~ 0 ~ _ s~ c` ns~. ~1°~ ~ ~ ISSUES: [and Supporting information Sources] ~~~ c ~ ~ ~~3ma m ~ o ~~~ y ~ ~ Zc ~ aU1 -~N ~ e ~N of an existing or proposed school? [2,29,30,40,44] d} Be located on a site which is included on a ^ ^ ^ list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment`? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land O ^ ^ ~• use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two mi{es of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ^ ^ ^ = • airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically ^ ~ ^ ^ ~~ interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] h) Expose people or structures to a ^ ^ ^ significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where . wi{dlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY . --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or ^ ~ ^ ^ waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater ^ ^ • ^ ,~ supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] 2~ -a~ I ~ ~'_ ' ' " ~_ _° ~ ~c o ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] * , c~ _ = a ~ E ~~o }- ~, = •- a, ~- ~ N 3 ~ ~ ea ,~ _ ~ J ~ ono z Q- ~ ~ ~ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage ^ ^ ^ ~. pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion of siltation on- or off-site? [14, 20,36) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage ^ ^ ^ ;~ pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or of€--site [20,36,38] e) Create or contribute runoff water which ^ O ^ ., would exceed the capacity of existing or ' planned stom7water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff'? [20,36,42] f} Otherwise substantially degrade water ^ ^ ^ ~, quality? [20,36,37] g} Place housing within a 100-year flood t^ O ^ ~ ~, hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood ~ Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2,3$] h} Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ^ ^ ^ ~ `~. structures which would impede or redirect .. flood flows? [2,38] i) Expose people or structures to a significant ^ ^ ^ risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ^ ^ ^ ~ mudflow? [2,36,38] tX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a} Physically divide an established ^ ^ ^ community? [7,12,22,41] b} Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ^ ^ ^ ~ policy, or regulation of an a envy with 21 - 88 U ~ o V ~ '++ y. ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] ,~c~ c ~ ~ , ~'c3~o d w = N=~ m a~ _ ZE _ • a cn o -~ in ~ ~ --~ ~ jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, focal coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ^ . ^ conservation plan or natural community - conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] X. MINERAL RESOURCES --Would the '- - - project: • - a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ^ ~ ^ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [516] b) Result in the loss of availability of a ^ ^ ^ locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, ~ - specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] XI. NOISE w Wauid the project result in: - a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, ^ ^ ^ .~ noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8,18,44] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ^ ^ ^ .~ excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? (8,18,44] c) A substantial pemlanent increase in ^ ^ ^ ~ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the projec#? ,[8,1 8] d) A substantial temporary or periodic ^ ^ ~ ^ increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e} For a project located within an airport land ^ ^ ^ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted; within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose peo le residing or workin in the 21 - 89 • Ri v V ~ o ~ t v~ ~„~ L .~ ~ .~ ~ 41 V ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] ~ _ e m E ~, ~ 3 ~ ~. ~ a' ~ ~ y = c. m ~ ~ Z a ~ am . ~v~ ~ c ~cn project area to excessive noise levels? [8=18~~] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ^ ^ ^ ~ airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18] Xll: POPULATION AND HOUSING --Would the project: a} Induce substantial population growth in an ^ ^ ^ area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly {for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? j3,18,47,44] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing D ^ ^ housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,1fi,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ^ ^ ^ ~.~ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,18,44] Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the • - provision of new or physically altered r - '. governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the - construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives far any of the public services: - l=ire protection? [19,32,44] ^ ^ ^ Police protection? [33,44] ^ ^ ^ Schools? [29,30,44] ^ ^ ^ ~ Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] ^ ~ ^ ^ ~- Other public facilities? [19,20,44] ^ ^ ^ }~. XIV. RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of ^ ^ ^ existin nei hborhood and regional arks or 11 -'.iU ~'~~ ~ o ~~ o c ~~•r *• ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] ®c e ~ E ~ ~ •~ ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ H .= a. ~ ~ E Z Q. E a m -~ cn ~ c --i N other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational ^ ^ ^ ~, faalities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect an the environment? [5,44] XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project; a) Cause an increase in traffic which is ^ D ~ ^ substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] - b} Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ^ ^ ~ ^ a level of service standard established by the i ~' • . county congestion management agency for • - designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ^ ^ ^ - including either an increase in traffic levels or . a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4,?] - d) Substantially increase hazards due to a-~ ^. ^ ^ ' ~Q design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment}? [20,35,44] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? • ^~ ^ ^ [2,19,32,33,44] fl Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ^ ~ [17,x] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ^ ^ ^ programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: 21 - 91 i ISSUES: S ti ~_~ ~ = c ~ ~ ~_ o H"==' ~Q. ~ 3 ~ ~._~ ~ ~ ~. ~ o~ Z rs. E ources] on [and Supporting Informa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a cry - m c --~ of a) Exceed wastewater treatment ^ ^ 17 ~ requirements of the applicable Regional . Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of ^ ^ O new water or wastewater treatment faci{ities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of ^ ~ ^ ,`~ new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmenta! effects? [5,22,28,36,44] e) Result in a determination by the O ^ ^ : ~ . wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ^ ^ ^ := i~ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] g} Comply with federal, state, and {oval ^ ^ ^ statutes and regulations related to solid ., waste? [?j 21 - 92 h~ ~7 1 ~~.. ~t bN F,. ~J&..e~k~ikC '~^t5''~ ~' .1ZY `~a7R +~`iwJ.~. .~~ ~' t" a'+'~'~:c.2~ V~ ~~~ _' ~ r ~ ~t ~ .yt y ~ ~ 1 ' °` ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ - ~ Sg, l mss. -•~ ~ f ..iiyy 1S ~li.J~~YS"i~~// Z~ 4{'`"`~F yyM. ~~ IZ.++~+Pl ~~, mF"4'W' ....- .. - '. a} Does the project have the potential to ^ ^ ^ degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods'of California history or prehistory? [] b) Does the project have impacts that are ^ ^ ^ ~ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when • - viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental ^ ^ ^ ~. effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or . indirectly? p I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that 1 have used proper diligence in responding - accurately to all questions herein, and have.consulted,appmpriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. hereby acknowledge than any substant#al errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of re#ated project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature Print Preparer's Name 21 - 93 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environ[nentaf factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. D Aesthetics ^ Agriculture Resources ^ Air Quality ~ Biological Resources ^ Cultural Resources ~ Geology /Soils ^ Hazards ~ Hazardous Materials ^ Hydrology /Water Quality ^ Land Use /Planning . ^ Mineral Resources ^ Noise ^ Population /Housing ^ Public Services O Recreation ,~ TransportationlTraffic ^ Utilities /Service Systems ^ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ^ Although the proposed project could have a signficant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. O The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. .^ The proposed project MAY have a "pofentia[fy sign cant impact° or "potentially . significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been-adequately analyzed in an earlier dact~iment pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2} has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the. effects that remain to be addressed. ^ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier E1R or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and {b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project; nothing further is required. Staff Evaluato ERC Chairperson Z~ e Da e 3a(a$ Date 21 - 94 Initial Study Addendum For Oaks Shopping Center Mixed Use Building and Hotel Project File Nos. U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, EXC-2008-07, TM-2007-09, TR-2008-02 (EA-2007-06) GeoIo Soils: Geotechnical investigation shows no unusual soil conditions that would warrant extraordinary foundation or construction techniques. Parkin: Phase Exisfing New~Dev. Aggregated Shared Parking Supply Bus. Parking Parking Supply On- Parking Refit. grade/ garage R t. 1 288 122 410 356 494 410/84 2 387 147 534 417 470 305/165 Parking supplied is adequate for shopping center based on shared parking calculation in a mixed-use development. Trees• 47 trees proposed for removal. Project will have 67 tree replacements. All oak trees are preserved. Trees to be removed. 10 Monterey Pines 1 .Eucalyptus 1 Raywood Ash 15 Shamel Ash 1 Pitto sporum 1 Tree of Heaven 1 Holly Oak 15 Chinese Pistache 2 Evergreen Pear Traffic The proposal generates 178 vehicle trips during the morning commute and 355 trips during the evening pear period. This is a net increase i.xt traffic of 168 morning peak hour trips and 252 evening peak hour trips. 21 - 95 Morning and evening LOS calculations indicate no degradation of LOS below acceptable general plan standards for all studied intersections. One intersection at Stevens Creek and Stelling Rd is already operating at LOS E and the project contributes an insignificant amount of traffic to that intersection. 2~ - ss Community Development Dom, artrnent Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 ACTION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING QF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMTITEE HELD ON Apri130, 2008 Committee Members: Kris Wang Dave Knapp Ralph Qualls Marty Miller Committee Members absent: Steve Piasecki Staff present: Colin Jung APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 23, 2008 ACTION: Approval of minutes from January 23, 2008 MOTION: Marty Miller SECOND: Ralph Qualls ABSTAIN: none VOTE: 4-0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 20, 2008 ACTION: Approval of minutes from February 20, 2008 MOTION: Marty Miller SECOND: Ralph Qualls ABSTAIN: none VOTE: 4-0 NEW TTEMS: 1. Application No.: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06 (EA-2007-06), TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo (The Oaks Shopping. Center} Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. Use Permit to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of comrnerci.al space and construct a 4- story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two phases at an existing shopping center; Architectural and Site appxoval for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements at an existing shopping center; Tentative Map to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.0 and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area Iot; An Exception to the Heart of the City to reduce one side-yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building; A Tree Removal request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center 2~ - s~ ^ Noise o A noise study is not normally done with Hotel development applications ^ Geologic o No geologic/soils issues present ^ Trees ^ Traffic 0 47 trees are scheduled for removal. They are in the parking lot and building footprint area o No specimen or heritage trees will be removed 0 67 new trees will be planted around the site o The new traffic circulation pattern is an improvement over what exists at the site currently o The proposed development will correct an existing parking deficiency in the number of spaces. The first phase construction project will have 355 {shared) spaces and the second construction phase will add 470 (shared) spaces o The development is projected to generate 168 more am trips and 252 more pm trips during the commute period o No change in the LOS levels o No significant change in the signal wait times ^ Additional Discussion o Carbon emissions, solar systems should be considered in future discussions o Recycling of construction materials o Green Building practices ACTION: Recommendation for a Negative Declaration MOTION: Ralph Qualls SECOND: Dave Knapp NOES: none VOTE: 4-0 OLD BUSYNESS None Respectfully submitted, /s/Beth Ebben Beth Ebben Administrative Clerk G/planning/erc/upprovedmirac tes043008 21 - 98 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Apri130, 2008 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27,1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on April 30, 2008. - PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06 (EA-2007-0b), TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07, TR-208-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo (The Oaks Shopping Center) Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Use Permit to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4- story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 5b,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two phases at an existing shopping center; Architectural and Site approval for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail./office/convention center building ovex an underground paxking podium and site improvements at an existing shopping center; Tentative Map to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.0 and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot; An Exception to the Heart of the City to reduce one side-yard setback to 15 feet for, a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building; A Tree Removal request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends, the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts. /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g/erc/REC Etl'-2007-09 21 - 99 CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARATION As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27,1973, and amended on March 4,1974, January 171977, May 1, 1978, and July 7,1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on June 17, 2008 PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: U-2007-04, A5A-2007-06 (EA-2007-06}, TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo (The Oaks Shopping Center) Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd DiSCRETIOlVARY ACTION REQUEST Use Permit to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of camrnercial space and construct a 4- story, 222 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two phases at an existing shopping center; Architectural and Site approval for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements at an existing shopping center; Tentative Map to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.0 and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into two commercial condominium units and a common area Iot; An Exception to the Heart of the City to reduce one side-yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building; A Tree Removal request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved.landscape plan for an existing shopping center FINDINGS OF DECISIONMAKING BODY The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on City Clerk 21 - 100 .c '.fix. Republic ITS Intelligent 7ransport8tion Services October 18, 2447 E1221 David Stillman City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Traffic Impact Analysis Letter Report Proposed Redevelopment of The Oaks, Cupertino Dear Mr. Stillman: EXHIBIT A Republic ITS is pleased to submit this traffic analysis for the proposed redevelopment of part of The Oaks shopping center in Cupertino. This report reviews on-site circulation and parking, off- site parking along the Mary Avenue frontage, and off-site vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. INTRODUCTION This letter report summarizes an evaluation of the potential traffic impacts due to a proposed change in Land use for a portion. of The Oaks shopping center in Cupertino. The change is proposed for that portion of the center close to Route 85 where the movie theater was previously located. The new use is a mix of hotel, retail, office, and meeting room space. With input from City of Cupertino staff, the scope of this study reviews the following items: / An estimate of the net change in vehicle traffic and distribution of that traffic to the surrounding streets / A comparison of intersection performance at-the following nine locations: 1. Stevens Creek/Bubb 2. Stevens Creek/NB 85 ramp 3. Stevens Creek/SB 85 ramp 4. Stevens Creek/Mary 5. Stevens Creek/Stelling - 6. Stevens Creek/Saich 7. Stevens CreekBandley (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 42000 Osgood Road, No. 112 Fremont, CA 94539-~I}4301 BOSTON DALLAS I.OS ANGELES SACRAMENTO . SAN DIEGO SAN F1tAIVC75C0 Republic ID'S I~tellipent Traasporiation sB~IceS David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 2 8. Stelling/Greenleaf 9. Stelling/McClelian / Revi.ew of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit infrastructure per VTA guidelines / A review of on-site circulation and parking / A review of off-site circulation for the portion of the Mary Avenue site frontage Figure 1 shows a map of the site location, study area, and study intersections. J cna Eh 2: a j ~.._ .............. m; ~ ~ .._._ . o'; ~~ i ~: .. ~ I j __. ..~ _. Project Site t~~~~ a_ ~ Q 4 Q. ~`~ - .f a: ~iQ~ , Pafk~~ -- --- 1 jf s r rigure ~ Vicinity Map ...;_~_...._._.~ grsd~a Cti ,., :. fi:- ... _._ ,: . ;~ ~. -`--.p _.- iQi j?°. Sj I i.. - _- - 1. ;. I'raaTaef~ c~a~ o~ j "` - - ~ ..,. .-- i ~~ Study Intersection (typ.) - - ~ ..: la s ~: Imo; ~e .a .__...____ ....~ .. }, _, ...._..._~. ~ Nt _ ~ ',~ ..... _..... .. ~i '~0 SunT150 ~f ... d ~- _ ._ . ?epner Tree Ln K ! ... __ ; ., ,._. .. Roori ues Ave no ._; ~w__ Shauy.Or _ ~--_ i ~ ._ ~ ~~ S 3 1 t ., . r , a r , Sofa C I !O IJ Yt *~ ' K f "Os - ~ ~ ~ 1 ^ l i.., ,__..__ .._,.,... .. . __......-.-.i 11kC1ekan Rd f .i _ ' O 7 :R., ~~~' X51 i0 "_ - .- `c i ~ ; Source: Google (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -102 BoSTOra Das.Lns Los ArrGELES SACRAIvlIId'ro Sn>`r DIEGO SnN Fxnrresco .~.~, . Repub~iC David Stillman ITS City of Cupertino lntouigem OCtobe2 18, 2007 Trsnsportation Page 3 sef~i~5 EXECUTNE Sial~-VIMMARY The proposed project consists of demolition of a movie theater and commercial space and construction of a mix of hotel, retail, office, and restaurant/banquet space. The proposed land use is expected to generate 178 vehicle trips in the morning commute and 355 in the evening commute periods. The existing land use would be expected to generate 10 trips in the morning commute and 103 in the evening. These trips are considered an allowable deduction from the new proposed trips resulting in a net increase in traffic generation for the site at 168 trips in the monung and 252 trips in the evening peak periods. Based on input from Ciry staff, nine signalized intersections near the project site were selected for evaluation (see Figure 1). Also, a list of 17 nearby proposed developments plus. four pending projects was identified for evaluation as the Approved Trip Inventory (ATI}. Table 1 summarizes the intersection performance under the traffic scenarios labeled Existing, Existing + ATI, and Existing +ATI + Proj ect. Level of Service (LOS) is a letter grade that describes intersection performance, ranging from LOS A (good, not congested) to LOS F (jammed conditions, Long delays}. The Valley Transportation Authority defines LOS A through E as acceptable and LOS F as unacceptable. An impact occurs at a study intersection when the calculated with project LOS degrades from E to F based on the average control delay. For intersections already at LOS F a significant impact occurs when the average critical control delay increases by 4 seconds or more and the critical v/c increases by 0.01 or more. As shown in Table 1, there are no significant impacts expected from the Project. The adjacent Route 85 freeway is analyzed for this report according to VTA guidelines, and there were no significant impacts. The site is surrounded by a well developed transit, pedestrian and bicycle network and there are no expected significant impacts. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 - 703 Bosroir DALLAS Los At~cELES SACxA~•rro SAN DIEGO ~. SAN FxANCZSC0 ..,~ tip' Republic ID'S Intelliesnt Ti snsportation Services Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Summary David Stilbnan City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 4 Level of Service (Control Dela) Delay Change Study Intersections Exist Exist + ATI Exist + ATI +Proj Proj. AM C- (32.8) C- (33.0) C- (33.0 0.0 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Bubb PM C (27.4) C (27.4) C (27.3} -0.1 AM C (27.0} C (28.6) C 29.1) 0.5 Stevens Creek Blvd b~ SB 85 Ramps PM C (30.5) C- (34.9) D+ (36.3} 1.4 AM C {31.9) C- (33.9) C- (34.5) 0.6 Stevens Creek Blvd. & NB 85 Ramps PM C- (33.1) D+ (37.4) D+ (38.4) 1.0 AM C+ (20.6) C+ (22.2) C (23.7) 1.5 Stevens Creek Blvd. ~ Mary Ave. PM C (28.7 C- (34.4) D+ (37.1) 2.7 AM D+ (37.6) D (39.4) D (39.6} 0.2 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Stelling Rd. PM D {42.2) E+ (56.4) ~E~(57.3) 0.9 AM B (15.2) B (13.7) B (13.7) 0.0 Stevens Creek Bivd. & Saich PM B (15.3) B (14.9) B (14.8) -0.1 AM B- (18.2} B (16.7 B (16.6) -0.1 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Bandley PM C- (32.4) C- (33.1) C- (33.0 -0.1 AM B (13.7} B (13.2) B {13.2) 0.0 Stelling Rd. & Greenleaf Dr. PM B+ (11.9) B (14.7} B (14.8) 0.1 AM D+ (36.5) D 44.5 D (44. 0.1 Stelling Rd. & McClellan PM D+ {37.7 D (45.6) D 45.7) 0.1 Notes: Detailed level of service calculations are included in the a endix. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -104 BOSFON . DALLAS • L.os ANGELES • SACRAMENTO • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO ~~ . ~ . Republic 1TS Intel[lgent 7ranspor~ation Services EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY INTERSECTIONS David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 5 The nine study intersections are listed above and shown in Figure 1. They are located along the key vehicle access routes near the project site, and would be expected to see a change in traffic volumes if the proposed land use change is approved and built. Intersection operations during the morning and evening commute were studied for this report at each of the study intersections. Operations are described in terms of Level of Service (LOS), letter grade describing the quality of traffic flow through the intersections in terms of delay encountered by the average motorist. LOS ratings range from A to F, where A indicates no or little delay and F indicates jammed conditions. Table 2 provides a more detailed explanation of intersection LOS. Table 2 Intersection Level of Service Descri bons Level of Service Average control Delay Description (seconds/vehicle) A delay <_ 10.0 Traffic can move relatively freely with ve low dela s B + 10.0 < delay <_ 12.0 Traffic can move relatively freely with B 12.0 < delay <_ 18.0 minor delays B.` 18.0 < delay < 20.0 C + 20.0 < delay < 23.0 Traffic can move relatively freely with C 23,0 < delay < 32.0 moderate delays _ 32.0 < delay _< 35.0 C D + 35.0 < delay < 39.0 Delay becomes more noticeable D 39.0 < delay <_ 51.0 • _ S 1.0 < delay < 55.0 D E+ 55.0 < delay < 60.0 Traffic volumes are at or close to capaciTy, E 60.0 < delay < 75.0 resulting in significant delays and average _ 75.0 < delay <_ 80.0 speeds that are no more than about one- E third the un-congested speed F delay>80.0 Traffic demand exceeds available capacity, with very slow speeds (stop-and- go), long delays (over one minute} and standing ueues at signalized intersections Source: VTA (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 _ 105 BOSTON DALLAS LVJ ANGELES • SACRAA~NTO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCLSCO "v~ ..:. t f.. iiepublic iTS Inte2llgent Transportation seral~s Existing intersection operations are summarized in Table Authority defines any intersection at LOS E or better as existing intersection operations are all considered acceptable. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page b 1. The Valley Transportation acceptable operation. Therefore, The study area for this report extends along Stevens Creek Boulevard (SCB) from Bubb Avenue to Bandley Drive, and along Stelling Road from Greenleaf Drive to McClellan Road. On SCB, there are currently paved sidewalks on both sides of the street throughout the study area. At the signalized intersections, there are east-west signalized crosswalks at all locations. There is at least one north-south signalized crosswalk at every intersection except for the two Route 85 ramps. On Stelling Road south of SCB there are paved sidewalks on both sides of the street and signalized crosswalks at the traffic signals. North of SCB there are pedestrian walkways on both sides of the street. The walkways are paved between SCB and Alves Drive, then alternate between paved and compacted soil between Alves Drive and Greenleaf Drive. There are four signalized crosswalks at the Stelling/Greenleaf traffic signal. BICYCLE ROUTES The study area for this report extends along Stevens Creek Boulevard from Bubb Avenue to Bandley Drive, and along Stelling Road from Greenleaf Drive to McClellan Road. Both streets are currently striped with Class 2 bike lanes in both directions throughout the study area. There are also Class 2 bike lanes striped on Mary Avenue north of Stevens Creek Boulevard, and on McClellan Road west of Stelli.ng Raad.. TRANSIT There are two bus routes that serve the project site, VTA routes 23 and 53 as shown in Figure 2. Route 23 connects the site to Downtown San Jose to the east and San Antonio Shopping Center to the northwest. It runs about every 15 minutes during the day and once an hour in the late evening. Route 53 connects the site to Westgate Shopping Center in Saratoga to the southeast and Sunnyvale Town Center to the north. It runs about once an hour in the morning and every half hour in the evening. The closest westbound bus stop is located on Stevens Creek Boulevard just west of Stelling Road. The closest eastbound bus stop is also on Stevens Creek Boulevard, located just east of Mary Avenue. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 37b5 Yale Waq Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -106 BOSTON DALLAS I.oS ANGELES SACRAMIN'I~ SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO Republic lTS Intelligent. Transportation s~rvl~s 1-- l~~ ~^'~-~~-l. ~~ ~ Figure 2 Transit Map 2 David Stillman City o£ Capertino October 18, 2007 Page 7 ~i`i~ ~. W ~t~evens .Creek Cupertino City Hali. ^ Source: VTA (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 - 107 BosrON Da.>,~s Los Artc~.>:s SaCRAMFNI'O S.~N DtECO Snrr Fxnrrczsco cl„ Republic David Stillman I'f'$ City of Cupertino i~ta~itgem October 18, 2447 Trenspor~stion Page 8 . seNroes TR A,FFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS This section describes potential impacts on the transportation network if nearby Approved Projects and the proposed project are constructed and add to the traffic volumes in the study area. The scenarios of added traffic are summarized as follows: • Existing Conditions plus the Approved Trip Inventory (ATI), a summary of project trips from approved projects that are not yet occupied including the formerly proposed project that included the movie theater and commercial space. This scenario is summarized as Exist +ATI. • Project trips for the proposed development. This scenario is summarized as Exist +ATI + Project. The following paragraphs discuss the Level of Service (LOS) and queuing analysis for the study intersections. The LOS values are calculated using Traffix as required in the VTA Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Printouts of each LOS calculation are included in the Appendix. The queuing analysis is also based on the average queue from the Traffix analysis. APPROVED PROTECTS City staff furnished a list of 17 proposed development that have akeady been evaluated and approved by the City but not yet constructed or occupied, plus another 4 proposed development that~are far enough along in the development review process that it is reasonable to include them in this study. A list of these prof ects can be found in the appendix. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -108 BOSTON • DALLAS Los ANGELES SACRAIv~T1TO SAN Deco SAN FrcANCrsco ~n.;;,~ w, ;;`.. Republic tTS lntslligens Transportation services David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 9 Estimated traffic volumes for anost of these projects were provided by City staff. Republic ITS staff suggested trip distribution patterns for each development which were reviewed by City staff. Finally, volumes at the study intersections were estimated based on the generation and distribution then added to the Existing volumes. New LOS values were calculated and are shown in Table 1. As before, all intersection operations remain at acceptable levels of LOS E or better. PROJECT TRIP GENERATIDNAND TRIP DISTRIB UTION The proposed pxoject consists of removing an existing building with a movie theater and commercial space and constructing a new building with hotel, retail, and meeting room banquet room space. The proposed land uses, sizes, and estimated trip generation are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Estimated Trin Generation Ex istin Tri Generation Land Use ITE Amount AM Trips PM Trips Daily Code ~ put Total In Out Total Trips Movie Theater 443 15 KSF 2 2 4 87 6 93 1,171 Commercial 493 3 KSF 3 3 6 5 5 10 130 Existin Totals 5 5 10 92 I1 103 1,301 Proposed Trip Generation Hotel 310 121 rms. 32 23 55 29 30 59 971 Retail 820 18.2 KSF 26 17 43 78 85 163 1,785 Office 710 18.3 KSF 42 6 48 17 82 99 361 Meeting rOOTT1S2, 3 310 14.4 KSF 19 13 32 17 17 34 428 Proposed Total s 119 59 178 141 214 355 3,545 Net Chan a 114 54 168 49 243 252 2,244 Notes 1Assumes 90% occupancy 2Assumes 300 SF per hotel room for trip rate equivalency 3Calculated from Average trip generation rate TTrip generation rate calculated from total retail land use area of 35,000 GSF The trip generation rates used in Table 3 are from Institute of Transportation Engineers-Trip Generation 7th Edition. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -109 BOS'T'ON DALLAS LOS ANGELES . SACRAMII~d1T0 . SAN DIEGO SAN FttANCISCO ~A; •,, '~-<:~ -- Republic ITS Intalllgeitt Transportation se~l~s David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 10 LEVEL OFSERVICE (LDS) ANALYSIS As with the Approved projects, a draft trip distribution pattern was developed by Republic ITS staff and reviewed by the City for use in this analysis. The approved pattern, is summarized as follows: • 40% north on Route 85 • 30% south on Route 85 • 5% west of SCB • 7% north on Stealing Road • 15% east on SCB • 3% south on Stealing Road The volumes were added to the volumes from the Exist + ATI scenario to form the Exist + ATI + Project scenario. Level of Service was calculated with the new volumes and is summarized in Table 1. After Project traffic is added, LOS values remain within the acceptable range of LOS E or better. LOS calculations are included in the Appendix, as are summaries of the peak hazer traffic volumes for each scenario_ There are no significant impacts on intersection operations that result from the proposed development and no mitigation measures are required. LEFT TURNQUEUINGANALYSIS A queuing analysis was conducted based on the average vehicle queue length reported from the Traffic software output. The projected queue length was determined using an average vehicle length of 20 feet per vehicle. The calculated queue lengths for all Left turn movements at study intersections where the proposed project adds left turn traffic are summarized in Table 4. As shown, all queues are less than the available storage except one move at the SCB/Mary intersection, which has a long queue because of other approved projects. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -110 Bosrots Dnu..as Los ANC>;r.~s SacRn~[vTO SAN DECO SaN Fxarresco ~.:. I~ Republic ITS Intelligent Transportation s°rYl~s Table 4 Queue Length Summary David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 11 Location Approach Direction Storage Length (ft) (No of Lanes) Peak Hour Existing Queue Length (ft) Exist + ATI Queue Len h (ft) Exist +ATI + Proj. Queue Len (ft) SCB - 85 S SB 550 (2) AM 180 340 .360 PM 140 220 240 SCB - 85 S WB 1770 (3) AM 80 I00 120 PM 180 240 280 SCB -Mary SB 260 (I) AM 40 40 60 PM 120 140 200 SCB -Mary EB 220 (1) AM 100 100 140 PM 180 240* 300 SCB - EB 300 (1) AM 180 200 200 Stelling PM 200 260 280 SCB - NB 320 (1) AM 260 260 260 Stelling PM 260 340 360 Notes: Bold font indicates a queue length that exceeds the storage pocket length. * =Caused by added traffic if existin vacant on-site buildings were re-occu ied. There is a potential impact on the left turn storage length at the SCB -Mary Avenue intersection for the eastbound left turn movement during the PM peak hour. There is a potential negative impact on intersection storage, and the required mitigation measure is to lengthen the left turn pocket from 200 to 300 feet. Modification of the traffic signal timing to increase the green time for this left turn move is also recommended. FREEWAYANALYSIS Since the project is located adjacent to a ramp of the Route 85 freeway, the VTA guidelines require evaluation of project impacts on the freeway. The first evaluation looked at whether the project traffic represents 1 percent or more of the freeway segment capacity. Two locations were found to have a contribution slightly less than 1 percent, and were flagged for further study. Based on the VTA Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines, the two lacations that were found to have added project traffic nearing the 1 % capacity are summarized below: • NB Rte 85, PM Peak, SCB to I-280: LOS B: Project contribution 0.7 • SB Rte 85, PM Peak,. SCB to De Anza: LOS F: Project contribution 0.9% {510} 440-8127 Fax (510} 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -111 Bos'rois D.~x.as Los At`rc~s SACxni~niz~o S.~ta Deco Snt`r F>z.~vcrsco Republic ITS IAI9+,IIQ0111 TrensporSation Services David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 12 According to the VTA guidelines an impact is considered significant when the project contributes more than 1 % of capacity and the freeway segment is at LOS F in the existing scenario. The impact on southbound Route 85 between De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard does not constitute a significant impact, hence no mitigation is required or proposed. A summary of the full analysis is included in the Appendix. There are no significant impacts on freeway operations for the two freeway segments analyzed. TRANSIT, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIANIMPACTS According to VTA guidelines, impacts on transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities occur if the project causes congestion that impacts bus flow, impinges on bike lanes by adding significant amounts of right tum traffic, or blocks existing, pedestrian. facilities. None of these criteria hold true so there are no significant impacts. There are no significant impacts on transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities and no mitigation measures required. SITE CIRCULATION The project site is part of an existing shopping mall, which is bordered on the west by Route 85, on the north and east by Mary Avenue, and on the south by Stevens Creek Boulevard {see Figure 1). Access to the site is provided via two driveways on SCB near Mary Avenue and two driveways along Mary Avenue. The proposed project includes demolition of the northwesterly building and replacing it with paved surface parking and construction of two new buildings along Route 85 frontage. The eastern entrance off of SCB will be modified to allow full on-site access. The site map showing the proposed new buildings and existing buildings that will remain is shown in Figure 3. The existing site has four driveways to adjacent streets. The proposed site plan proposes to modify the eastern entrance to a full access driveway. The existing site has two areas of concern that would likely be heightened with addition of project traffic: 1. The entry off SCB, which carries the largest volume of traffic of the existing driveways, has an awkwazd layout and a raised island that make for inefficient movement to and from SCB. This comment applies to the existing condition. The proposed condition shows a modification to provide a larger island adjacent to Stevens Creek Boulevard. . The island as currently drawn appears too large to allow truck access to and from Stevens Creek Boulevard. This report recommends checking the truck turn path and modifying the east-west width of the island if needed. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510} 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 - 112 B05TON . DALLAS . LOS ANGELES SACRAMEN1ip SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO f Republic ITS Intell(gent Trsn&pArlat~an services David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 13 2. The existing parking aisle closest to SCB and the~next aisle have directionality that is reverse of typical right hand drive, which forces traffic to cross awkwardly at the each end of the parking bay. Reversing the direction of the angled parking, aisle direction and the two-way access would improve on-site circulation. The current site plan already accommodates this recommendation, and no further action is needed. See Figure 3. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -113 So5roN Dnr.Las _ Los ANCS[.ES SACxn~.ri'O Snt~ Dffco SArr Fltatacrsco .I --.} RARKIN6R~UIREM€NT: HOTEL-f3V~9TRODlAtJ~!'~MEIK: M1'M~I~.IrtRwM+4rofi'Mro te'eum m,.r rWP',/O1rN1 AM RSS••q IN.gr~ IUIiL ... Mw.'A D-,T ~C~ __ I ( 3~- j ~ ] ~ s I C k 4 ri~ Q$ y Is•, II I 1 i s ktl ~ U t r _ .. . _l..........' -- ._-.... . i.. ._.-.... ... _.. ... .. . (• ] F .. ........ ............ _i_.. ...i-...__ _. _. I; ~ i ~ n~K~•~sn J.(I4Wrt`NgYtw (M.IM rtt ^1141 .?. ~ :( ~ ti, _ }~`_ .. !t . ~, ` `. e c-+.rs rrmM U^1 n•MI`w.7 i/yA~ '•-+•!t•,n•rtpy4. KESSS411)s.91 Kar+ I ~ •~ .'. •r ~ I't'rfrl••r-n t' ` ~ . ' OwaL[fAYMbin •ti rsrrteaet• LR V/] -s7 r.~~r....ro....n ~•. 1 I 1-Cnq.•CS fi.Y.i$f 4~INnCtnrlCir 4lw•SNgRMI•YY• ~ 1 ry s 11 y •.' M{~IIT![( llrr.YlJ.f}Il11aLRChOlf[M • i ~. f X11 1 ` ~ M~ I ~I , I '~ ~ _ -- _ ~ _ r _ _ I C7 iJ F i RY1 I ~ L4f• -{ 1 ~f _ ~t' a I, 1 •' I l ~ I ~I - .._... +,~ -~-_- -_ -- _. _ I - W d I • _- ~r I . ~ "--"-' - rl 111 ',,II '1 '+a7.F~_ i~i ~ f, i ,f`~ II I r r )) I ' F ~ r ` -~;~,. 111YS R< [[r(4sr S +n4 - ---. ' PRtuM1W+~FtY 31!F_E PLAN A . - - ivi.'r•ari - .. if I I 1 _~... 1.~..,- ~ 1~ , _ -II .I g~ .1111 Wx6 ~ J ~I 111111 F U 11 II 111 I L. .__ ~~ I. _~ .- FI{tl7APQhltY .... _ SITE PUUI ____ .-. DR - 2 ,5•.s7. AHt'fil Figure 3 Source: Sand Mill bevelopment Company Site Plan (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON • DALLAS LOS ANGT;LTS SACRAMENTO SAN DrLGO • SAN FRANCISCO (510) 440-8127 'Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON . DALLAS I,OS ANGELES SACRAMENTO . SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO t ~~~~~ ~+~ ~~ Intelligent Ti r~n~p4r t~tir~n Servlr.~s CONCLUSIONS Demolishing the movie theater and adjacent commercial space replacing it with the proposed mix of retail, office, and restaurant/banquet space would not result in any significant LOS impact to the study intersections. The evaluation of left turn storage capacity identifies a potential impact at the Stevens Creek Boulevard and Mary Avenue intersection for the eastbound left turn movement. The required mitigation measure is to lengthen the left turn pocket from 220 to 300 feet. Additionally, implementing the revisions noted on the site plan would greatly enhance on- site traffic circulation. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments at 510/440-8127. Sincerely, Republic ITS ~-'r Steve Fitzsimons, P.E. . Transportation Engineer (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 42000 Osgood Road, No. 112 Fremont, CA 94539~Q43~ 16 Bos~rora DA~.Las Los Aivcsr.ES $ACtta~ro Sasr Deco SAN Fx~xcrsco j ~~lx~ ~~ lntell'rg~ret T~~r~,s~pa~riaticrn S~~vi~s APPENDIX (510) 440-8127 Fax {510) 440-1751 42000 Osgood Road, No. 112 Fremont, CA 94539-t943~117 BOSI~DN . DALLAS . TAS ANGELES SACRAIvIFNI'O SAN DIEGO SAN Z"ItANCISCO Freeway Level of Service Calculations Route 85 Direction Peak Hour Segment Project Tri s Lanes Segment Ca acity Percent Increase NB AM SCB to 280 22 3 6,700 h 0.3 NB AM De Anza to SCB 23 2 4,800 vph 0.5 SB AM 280 to SCB 31 3 6,700 vph 0.5 SB AM SCB to De Anna 16 2 4,800 vph 0.3 NB PM SCB to 280 52 3 6,700 h 0.7 NB PM De Anna to SCB 12 2 4,800 vph 0.3 SB PM 280 to SCB 16 3 b,700 vph 0.2 SB PM SCB to De Anza 39 2 4,800 h 0.9 (510) 440-8127 Faa (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -118 Bos7'oiv DAr~+.s Los AzrGS[~s SACRat~nn~o S~v D~GO SAN FRANCrsco List of Approved and Pending Projects Approved 1. Wolfe & Vallco Parkway (Vallco Residential) 2. N. De Anna Blvd. and T-280 (Oak Park Village) 3.20128 Stevens Creek Blvd. (Adobe Terrace) 4. 1375 S. De Anna Blvd. (Wolf Camera) 5. 19770 Stevens Creek Blvd_ (Marketplace Bldg. C) 6. De Anza Blvd & Rodrigues Ave.{Civic Park) 7. Stevens Creek & Wolfe Road (Menlo Equities} $. DVolfe & Vallco Parkway (Occ of Vacant Space) 9. Wolfe & Vallco Pazkway (Va11co Expansion) 10. Stevens Creek Blvd. & Stelling (De Anna College Expansion} 11. C~Jhole Foods 12. Stevens Creek & Portal Dr. (Chuck E. Cheese) 13. Mariam Ave. & N. De Anza (Any Mtn Off} 14.22350-82 Homestead Rd. (Harrington) 15. 20565 Valley Green Drive (Public Storage) 16. 610 Alberta. Avenue (Riorden & Reston Terraces) 17. 707 E. Homestead Rd. (Pala & Francolin Terraces) Pending 10 i 00 N. Tantau Avenue 20800 Homestead/10807 N. Stelling (Villa Serra} 10855 N. Stelling Rd. (Lary Guy) De Anza B1vd.Bollinger Rd {in San Jose} (510} 440-$127 Fax (510}440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5{}43 21 -119 BOSrON . DALr.as Los ANG~.FS SACRAMII~TO Snx Deco SAN FRANCLSCo The Oaks NB EB SB WB Project Traffic RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT SCB-Bubb AM 5 2 PM 2 10 SCB-SS Sonth AM 5 40 2 13 PM 2 20 10 61 SCB-8S ~ AM 30 45 * 18 15 North/College E~zit PM 15 22 * * 81 71 SCB-Mary AIvI 75 .17** 11 13 13 PM 37 76** 51 6 6 SCB-Stelling AM 3 1 7 3 7 15 PM 1 6 30 14 3 7 SCB-Saich AM 7 15 PM 30 7 SCB-Bandley AM 7 15 PM 30 7 Stelling-Greenleaf AM 3 7 PM 14 3 Stelling-McClellan . AM 3 1 PM 1 6 No#es: * =Shows traffic for NB College Exit at this intersection, no project traffic assigned. ~`'` =Traffic exiting the site to the west is expected to use the driveway to SCB. The volume shown here is for reference only. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510} 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 21 -120 Bo~sro~v DAT7.AS LosANCELFS SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO SANFRANCISCo Fxiacing AM peak Thu OOC •11, 1007 iae16:34 page 1-1 Cupertino TIA Intarucdon Calculations SCRIariO AepOLC 9censrioe Bxirtiag AH Pask Command. 8ai4ting + ATI • Dro~ecc AM volume: S+cisting AM Peak Hour Csocmotry~ E(ci sting AM I~ryaot pn~ Detavlc Irapacc pee Trip Generaclon~ None • Trip Distribution: Daily paths. Delsult paths P,outesl Default Aoucea Cop[1gOZacion: Default ConEiguration• TraCCix 7.8.0715 {c) 3006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OR CUPSRTINO N N axiecsng AM peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 is s16~25 page 2-1 Cupertino TIA Intarsactioa Caleulaciona Trip Distribution Report Percent OL Trips Daily , TO Oacaa 1 7 3 a 5 6 Zone ___._ '--__ __._. -"-' -"__ __•_. 1 t0-0 30-0 5.0 7.0 3.0 15.0 TraELi~c 7.8.0715 (o) ]006 Dowling lusoo. Licensed to CITY OP CUP6ATIN0 Sxieting AM Peak Thu Oet 11, 2007 14i18~25 Paga 3-1 Cupertino TEA IntaraeeCian CilCUlaciOna Turning Movement RepOrc NOM volua~ MOYthbOUnd Southtound Lesthonmd wescbow0. Total type Laft Thru Aight Iwft Thzu Right fAlt Thru Aight Lilt Thru Right Volume MS BCevens Creak i Subb Ad ease 194 31 509 93 17 30 14 896 87 507 632 36 2451 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 Total 144 it 308 9i 37 30 14 896 B7 507 B32 35 1951 #2 8tavane Creak i !pry Ave Las• 37 3 29 70 li 171 214 961 230 8! 787 B4 1610 Added ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. Total 37 3 29 70 11 171 214 951' 239 89 787 c6 14t0 #3 cravens Creak 6 8B !5 Ramps Base 0 0 0 B70 0 101 0 1097 180 173 6B1 0 3027 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SoCal 0 0 0 670 0 101 0 1043 180 171 661 0 3017 A4 9C41Vens Creek i NL 16 Ramps Base 40 63 0 118 B 361 681 1145 0 0 581 495 3699 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 D 0 Total 40 ea O 126 5 361 681 1345 0 0 541 493 3699 p5 9cwena Cteek i 8ttlling Rd Lase 383 846 196 101 349 191 746 412 193 443 663 1!7 4035 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 Tocel 393 54B 146 102 354 191 148 911 193 443 683 241 4038 #6 Stawns Creak i 9AICA 8asa 0 0 0 34 0 103 ' 249 630 0 0 84B 60 2184 Adad D o 0 0 o D o D a D o 0 0 Total 0 0 0 34 0 103 259 830 0 0 898 60 1169 #7 Scevans Cznk i 8randlay Lase 14 74 2 36 9 21 180 661 20 18 858 108 1931 Added 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11 24 2 36 9 22 130 661 20 1a 838 108 1832 Re Btalling i Or~anlsa! Base 14 66i 24 9 515 50 109 20 31 34 15 31 1810 Added D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Total I4 658 24 9 615 50 109 20 37 34 1! ]1 1810 p9 Leelling i McClellan ease 713 551 75 113 69 69 192 "249 91 66 394 199 21Y1 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 113 381 75 li3 69 68 291 149 41 S6 19i 189 2161 Tra!!ix 7.8.0715 Jc) 1008 Dow110g A6a0C. LitsMad to CITY OF CUPSRTINO N N N Existing AM Peak ThU OCC 11. 1097 14.16:26 Page 9-1 Cupaztina TIA.Inter9ection Caltulaciona Impact Analysis Report Level 0! Service ~ ' intar6aCtion Dase Ebcure Chsnge bal/ V/ Del/ V/ in 7.05 Veh C L08 veh C # 1 8cevans'Creak i Bubb Rd C- 32.8 0.396 C• 32.8 0.694 + 0.000 D/V # 7 BGwn3 Creak 0 glary 11ve C+ 20.6 0.338 C. 70.6 0.368 + O.OOD D/V A 3 Stevens Creak 6 BB BS Ranpa C 17.0 0.945 C 97.0 0.448 + O.DOD D/V # 4 Stevens Creak i NB es Rasps C 31.9 0.823 C 31.! 0.624 + 0.000 D/V # S Stevens Creek i 8ta111Dg Rd D+ 37.6 0.721 D. 37.6 0-722 + 0.000 D/V p 6 8tava[la Creek i BAICA ~ L 19.2 0.774 8 ib.2 0.375 + DODO D/V # 7 SteYent Creek i 3lrendlay L- 16.2 0.393 D- 1'6.2 0.393 + 0.000 D/V p 6 Stalling i DreenleaE L 17.7 0.596 8 13.7 0.596 + 0.009 D/V # 9 Stalling i MCClallen D+ 36.5 0.619 D+ 38.5 0.679 + 0.000 D/V Tra!!Sx 7.6.0716 ~eJ 3006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed t0 CITY OP COII6RTIt40 Bxiating AN Peak Thu tlct 11, 7007 14.16x76 Page S-1 Csspartino TIA Intersection CalaulaClORa Level O! 8erviee Computation Rsporc 1000 HCM Oparasions Method (Future volume Alcornative) rraHH+}Aar Afafa•larlrr+aAaN lea Hierarrr+AAwrAR\Aa+arrrifrr l+\r\r!\•+a}aa•1\r• Intaraectitxs !:l Btavans Creek 4 Bubb Fd H r Hlawla 1\ a•rr++•+\+r++aak1AH aaaalrAAirArlrrrarr HlHHalalH H+saaw••laaaaa• Cyela (see)r 170 Critical vol./Cap.SX)s 4.596 Loea Tima (sack 12 (Y+Rr4.0 AeC) Avarags Delay (seo/veh)a 11.1 opeitso] Cycl ea 49 Twval Or Servicer C- r+ ra +rrrarH•a+Iw+rwa++rlHlHlaH!l+ara+r•A!•IallllH laalaH Haal Hlaaaaf• Approachr North Bound South Hound Ra6C Bound Nast Easard MoVementr L- T- A L- T - A L- T- R L- T- R Controls 9plie Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Righter Ovl Include Include Include Min. Dreear 7 SO 10 ? 10 1D 7 10 "10 7 10 10 Lanear 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 7 0 1 7 0 1 1 0 ___--_______I---------------II--_--.-._-.-._.II...-.---.--.---II-----_---------I Volume Modules Sass vole 144 11 SOS 93 Y7 50 14 446 97 607 e37 35 OrowtA Adjr 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Initial Bsas S44 11 805 93 27 SO 14 446 97 507 837 35 Added Vola 0' 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 D 0 0 pataeieyVOla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 initial II11ts 144 11 505 93 37 BO 14 6!6 97 b07 137 39 User Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RREr Adjs 0.92 0.92 '0.91 0.92 0.91 0.97 O.D1 0.91 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.92 PHF Volumes lb7 17 549 101 79 54 14 707 95 SSL 904 39 Aaduct Volr 0 0 151 0 0 47 0 0 99 0 0 3 RlduCad Wlr 157 17 397 101 29 7 15 707 27 551 909 33 FCB Ad1r 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I,00 I~00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 MLF Adjr a.DV 1.00 I.00 l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.oD i.oD i.bo 1.oD 1,Do Final YOl.a ib7 17 797 101 79 7 15 701 17 E51 904 I9 eaCUration Flow Modules SaC/Loner 1900 1900 1900 1900 5900 1900 1900 Ii00 1900 1900 1900 1lOD AdjOataMntr 0.95 0.99 0.63 0.91 1.00 0.9] 0.92 1.00 0.97 0.93 0.97 0.95 lancer 0.93 0.07 1.00 1. D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.l1 0.08 Final Aat.. 1677 179 3150 1750 1900 1780 2?SO 3900 1150 3250 3561 138 Capaalty Analysis Modular Yol/Bate b.09 O.tl9 0.13 0.06 0.01 0.00 O.OI 0.18 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.1E Crit Movfer ++~r rasa •+ar •rra Organ T1maa 1a.9 19.6 74-0 21.6 11.6 11.6 13.5 37.7 37,1 35.7 56.9 58.9 volume/Caps 0.60 0.60 0.18 0.60 0.16 0.01 0.09 0,60 0,04 0.60 0.91 0.57 Delay/Vehr 66.0 Ba.O 11.2 66.5 51.6 49.6 48.4 37.3 19.2 39.1 11.9 21.9 User DalAdjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Yeh+ 56.0 56.0 12.7 66.b 61.6 44.6 49,4 77.7 19.1 79.1 11.9 1].9 IDS by Mover S+ B+ C+ E D- D D DA C b C"+ HCM7kAVg(]a 7 7 5 5 1 0 1 11 1 I1 11 12 1••••H Ha+a•+Al\irNra+ra+A#aaA+tfarAaAaa/N aAarrRalaA aAa}laalaa4rraaaaaa Haarl Voter Cueue reported is the number o! cats par Ivsa, Traff iX 7.1.071E (e) 7006 Do\r]ixsg AasOC. Licensed t0 CITY OP CUPEATYMO N N W 6xla[ing AM Peak Thu OcC 11. 2007 39r16r16 IIsge 6-1 Cupertino TIA Intaraection calculatioma Level D! Service Computation AeporL 1000 NU1 Operations Method (Future volume Altemasive) raa+• rlraA•+lrrrrr+! r+rarN ~+-ar•r a}aAral rrH aalarHaalaa H ra HaHaar rM •ara lark 2ncarseetlon #2 Stevens Creek ` Mary Ava rarH HHwwAr1HHHAaAaaaallaalaawaaararrA•a+f+ar+w aA}+ra+l+r• HrA+araAaara aAa• Lytle (see)s 75 Critical vol./Cap.t8lr a,36e Loos Time fesalr la (Y+R.a.D sec) Average Delay fast/vehJr a0.4 optimal Cycles a6 Level 0! 8trvieea C+ HaarrH HHraw Haaa•H aria larraa urlHaa rrr q+.erreaa rawrrrwr raa HA\ alA gwaHH Applroach: Nozth Bound south Bauad Basc Bound oPesc Bound MOVementa L- T- A L- T - R G- T- R L- T- R ------------f---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I cantrol+ Protected Protected Protected Aroteeted Rights: include Include include InOluda Min. 6r6471r 7 10 30 7 70 1D 7 10 10 7 SO 10 Lancer 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Hoduler Base VOla 37 3 29 70 I1 272 714 952 flrowLh Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 IOit1aI Baer 37 3 19 70 .11 I72 714 9S2 Added Vols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PaasaYByVolr 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Initial Putr 37 9 29 70 11 171 214 957 Usec Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 FRP Adje 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PRF Volumes 40 3 37 74 17 167 ]13 1035 Redact vole 0 0 16 0 0 147 0 0 Reduced Volr 40 3 7 76 17 40 233 1039 PCS Ad]r 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjr i.oD l.oa 1.00 1.00 a.bD i.eo 1_eo i.9D Final Vol,r 40 3 7 T6 17 40 233 1039 230 69 757 66 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 230 69 757 66 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 130 49 757 66 1-00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.99 750 7S 673 72 180 0 0 57 70 7S 977 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.DO 1.00 i.DO 2.oD 70 7S 977 15 SDtvration Flo+r Moduler Sat/Lanes 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 Adju9tmenta 0.43 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.93 0.92 1.09 0.92 0.97 1.OD 0.91 Lance: 2.00 0.37 0.67 1,00 1.00 1.00 I,00 3.00 3.00 1.00 7-00 1.00 final eat_r~ 3150 600 1700 1750 1900 17b0 1780 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 Capacity Arialyeia Maduler Vol/Bats 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 b.i3 0.16 0,04 0.04 0.14 0.01 Crit MOVOar +rr• sera le+r +rar Organ Tiew+ 7.1 10-0 20.0 7.7 10.1 10.2 71.0 30.3 30.3 35.6 Z3.9 73.9 Valums/Cape 0.14 tl,04 0.04 0.45 O.OS 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.10 0.11 0.45 0.03 Dairy/vehr 37.1 79.6 76.6 90.7 76.6 30.3 .24.5 16.9 14.7 75.9 21.3 17.7 17aer DelAdjs 1.00 1.Otl i,tlb 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vehr 31.1 19.6 79.6 40.7 16.6 '10.1 14.E 16.9 14.7 ]5,9 11.7 .17.7 Log 4y Mwe. C- C C D C C C B - B C C+ . A BCM2kAvgQr 1 0 0 2 0 1 S 4 1 7 S 0 rrr NaaArrrraaAaaaaHawaaaaaArrararrAlHHraaawauaAaa a•ArraaH r•1Har a • aIHHH NoGar pueua reported is the number o! earn par lane. .TrafEix 7-a.071B (C) 700,6 Dowling ASaoc• L2Canaed Co CITY OF CUPERTTNO Fxietirig AM Peak Thu Oct 11. 2007 39r18,7b Pege 7-1 Cupertino TIA incereectipn Calculations Leval Of 6es,rice Co,nputacion Repose 2000 RC4 OperaCiona Method (Future volume Alternative) • a•aa•a•a•afaaa••a•aawaaaa••laaa}aaala•a!•aawarw•aaaa•H•awa•••aaawrflrraarrafa intersection A3 SNVene Cruk i 98 a9 Rare •r ra ar•1•N•fra aar rraawa r rrra •• Ia. MrarrlH •awf •rf rHwaaarM•NrHt+•H rHNaar• Cyels Isee)e 120 Critical vol-/Cap. Ix}a 0.445 SQae Timp leaf}= 9 (Y+R=(.0 ace) Average Delay (too/voh)t 27.0 Optimal Cycler 1/ Level Of 6ervice: C faraaar}aaaa•ralaafM•a1lra••f•faa•faf ra Hfaaraa•afaa}!rl wara•Iaaa}1a•{iota+aaaa Approach. North. IIouad south Sound Tast Sound Nest Bound MOVemmc,tc L- T- R L- T - R L- T- R L- T - A Ceotrbl, Protected Protected Protected Protected PSghtst Include include Include lnClude Mill. Breen, ~ 7 10 • 30 7 ID 10 7 30 10 7 30 10 Lanes r 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 Voluare Madula, ease vol: o ~ o 0 670 D 101 Bro,rch Adj. 1.DO S.oo S.OD l.oa l.oa 'i.oD initial Sea: 0 o D 670 a 101 Added Vo1r 0 0 0 D 0 0 Paesar9yVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 initial Fut, 0 0 0 070 0 101 user Aaj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.oD 1.oD PRF•Adja 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92'0.97 0.97 pIff volume. 0 0 0 946 0 110 AldUCt VOlr 0 0 0 0 D 67 Reduced Volr 0 0 0 946 D 43 DCC Aajr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Alit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 0 0 d 946 0 43 0 1043 1.oa l.oo 0 1041 0 O 0 0 0 1043 i.DD 1.00 0.91 0.41 O 1134 0 0 0 1134 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 O 1134 160 172 661 0 1.DO 1.00 1.00 l.oD 180 171 161 0 0 D 0 0 D o o D 160 171 661 0 l.oa l.oo l.o0 1,oD 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 186 187 T16 0 11 ], 0 0 0 73 187 716 d l.DD l.oo t.ao l.oD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 73 117 711 0 SacuraCiOn Floa Mndnlet Bat/Line, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 Adjvatmsntt 0.91 3.00 0.92 0:87 1.00 0.l1 0-91 0-99 0-95 0.43 1.00 0.92 Lanes. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00.0,00 f.00 0.00 3.75 0.;5 2.OD 7.00 0.00 Final 8at.t 0 D 0 4950 D 1760 0 704e aS2 3iso 3800 0 Capacity Analysis Modular VO1/6act 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.1f 0.00 0.02 .0.00 O.1A 0.16 0.06 0.19 0.00 Cris Moveea area ara• rrrr Breen Time. 0.0 0.0 0.0 91.6 0.0 51.8 0.0 43.4 43.4 16.0 59.4 O.D Volvrtu/Caps 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,14 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.44 0.14 0.41 0.38 0.00 Delay/Vehs 0:0 0-0 0.0 14.8 0.0 10.1 0.0 21.7 19.7 81.7 19-4 0.0 User DelAdja 1.00 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vent 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.9 0.0 20.1 0.0 19.7 19.7 51.3 19.1 0.0 L09 by Nover 'A A A C A C+ ' A C C D- B. ' BCM2kAvgpt 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 9 9 / 9 0 waa•rawaww ewwawaaw••warwawrrr•rrr•a•••w•••ar••••a•.rfa••a•a••aalwraaaaarrrrrarar Notes Ou~ue reported ie the number a! ears per lase, Treflix 7.8.0715 (ci 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUP,471.TSN0 N N A 7bcl sting Ali Peak Thu OCt 11. 2007 14116:26 Page 8-1 Cupertino tiA In carseetion Calculations 7wva1 OL Service Computation Report , 2000 RQ4 Operatlona Method fn,cure Volume Alternative3 a+r•ra•+•araa!••warlaa•aaraaa••a•aa•aar•aa•rrr•ar+alra+aaaaala•rraa laraaaaaawu• interaeetiNl R4 Stevens Creek i NB 85 Ramps ' war •+a •Mr•aRrarH •+aaaHaa rHHrrrHH rwH a• as ••a •!H a+ara•alawH a•w•af aaN ar r• Cycle (acc)t 120 Critical Vol./cap.(XJ. 0,615 Loar Time (seclr 11 (Y+R=9.0 aec) Average Delay (aec/vnh)r 31-9 Optimal Cycles 92 Level Of Service. ~ C r}a•aata!}rwrar}aawaa r•as•+a•awalwr}1rNaf•larraaa•ralaa •wrraraaa•raaar•arrrrra• Appsoach, Rorth 8ou~ South Bound &aec 8eund west 8otu3d Mbvemel,tt L '- T - R G - T- R L - T- R L- T - R ------------I---------------lf---------------li-----°--------ll------~--------I Cmtmlr Oplie Phase split Phase Froteeud Permitted Righter 71,cludn include include Ignore Min. 1lresnr 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 10 lb 7 10 10 Lanes: 0 3 1 0 0- 0 0 11 0 1 2 0] 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Volunu Modular 8eae Volt i0 83 0 229 4 361 691 1215 0 0 561 499 orowth Aaj, 1. oo S.oo z. oo 1_0o i.oD 1-DO l.oo S.oo 1.00 1.00 l.DO 1.Do Initial Baet 40 93 0 T28 5 3fi1 681 1245 0 0 561 495 AdMd Vplt 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4aaserSyVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 '0 0 0 2+1tc1a1 Futr aD e3 0 276 S 361 681 1145 D D 561 495 user Adjt l.DO l,oo l.o0 1,00 l.vD S.oo 1.oD l.oo l,DD l.oD 1.00 0-00 PAF Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 >?BF Volumes a3 90 O 241 S. 397 140 1161 0 0 610 0 Red.UCt Vplt 0 0 0 O 0 740 D 0 D 0 0 420 Reduced 'Volt 43 90 ~ 0 148 S -152 790 1353 D 0 610 0 Fes Aait i.oo l.oD l.DO 1.00 l.oa i.oo S.oD l.ao S.oD l,oD l.oo D,oo MLF Adjr 1.OD 1.OD I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Vol r 13 90 0 246 5 •152 740 1351 D 0 610 0 Saturacian Flow Modular Eat/Lama 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatmentr 0.95 0.9! 0-92 0.95 0.95 0-92 0.63 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0-92 Lanear 0.67 1.33 0.00 0.75 0.02 1.23 7.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3-DO 1_00, Final Sat.t 1207 7496 0 1345 29 2164 3130 8700 0 0 3700 1750 ------------I----------=----ii---------------il---------------II---------------) Capacity Aoalyaia Modular Vol/eats 0,04 0.04 0.00 O.iB 0.18 0.07 0.23 0.24 D.DD 0.00 0.11 0:00 Csit Movlat fora r••r •!•• rare O;za!en Tin,st 10.0' 10.0 D.D 34.7 34.J 34.7 47.8 63.7 0.0 0.0 19.9 0.0 volume/Caps O.aJ 0.43 0.00 0.6! 0.64 0.25 0.64 0.45 0.00 O.DO 0.64 0.00 Data//Vehs 66.7 56.7 0.0 42.5 42.5 33.3 34.4 17.8 0.0 0.0 B0.1 0.0 Uaar DelAdjt 1-00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vehs 56.7 66.7 0-0 92.5 42.5 33.3 34.4 17.8 0.0 O.d 90.1 0.0 iAS by Moves Sr 8+ A D D c- C- 8' A A D HCFtlkAVgQt 3~ 3 0 12 12 a 14 30 0 0 9 '0 • • raa••••a•••+aar •w.fa•••a•rraar.raraawrra+rrar+awaararwwaalaaaar•aaw•araw NotetJQtuua reported Se the number oP care per lane. TraLL1x 7.8.0713 Ic) 2006 Dolling Assoc. Licensed CO CITY OF CW6RTIN0 Existing AH Paak TAU OCL 11, 2007 14:11,16 Paga 9-1 Cupertino TIA tncararctibn caiculatiane Level Of service ~COmputation P.eporc 7000 ACM CBreretlona Method (PUCUre Volixna Al tatnatLVe) Ara••N r•a•iN area fan{+H Na. •pA•H•alraa~ar~.la#wr HalNN•N HaMNalaaaaa•ra Loterasecion IIS Beevana Creek i Stalling Rd a•r•rra•r•!r•rr•••.••aaaaaaaa••aaaaaaaA•••f•aauara•rr•aaararreaaAra•f.arraaar! Cycle tsee)r 90 Critical Vol./Cap.{x)r 0.771 Lose T1ma (a!C), 17 (Y+11a4.0 sat) Average Daley bet/vah)r 37.8 Optimal Cycle 61 Leval Oi Sazvice, D+ as•+a aiaaalr}laaaaa••lalf••a••a!a•aafa•r••a aka as•r•aAa•Iaiaafa••Ra•••a af•#f leer. Approa0hr North Bound Bouth Bound Bast Dotard Nest Sound MOVemenCr L T- R L- T- R L- T .• R L- T- R control. Protected Protected Protected PrOtatted Rights: Ino ludo Include Include Include Min. Oreen; 7 10 i0 7 10 10 7 10 10 1 10 ~10 Lanesr 1 0 7 0 1 1 D 7 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 Va11aN Modules 80aa VDlr 393 648 246 702 354 181 748 417 193 443 863 141 Uroach Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.90 ].09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Inizlal Heer 391 648 ll6 701 384 191 298 412 19b 493 '663 14] Added Volr 0• 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 PaseazayVOl. 0 D D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Initial Fucr 393 S4B 746 70] 354 L9L 74B 412 193 443 863 147 User Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OQ 1.00 1.00 PHP Adjr 0.97 0.9I 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 PHP Voiumsr 427 598 ]87 110 319 201 170 ~4f 210 487 711 184 RadaCL VO1s 0 D 196 tl 0 169 0 0 99 0 D 117 Reduoad Vol. 427 598 71 720 315 39 170 448 il6 ~ 481 721 27 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.OD 1.Otl 1.00 1-Q0, 1-00 1-00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adjr 1:6D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 Final Vol.r 427 596 71 270 385 39 770 448 115 482 721 77 -_--________ ____...__-.II_______________II-.-------...---II--..--------.--I 9acuration P ea Modular gat/Lunar 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatmmcr 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.99 0.95 0.63 1.00 0.92 I.enae• 1,00 2-00 1-00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.37 0.63 7-00 3-00 1.00 Final 8ac.: 3790 1800 1780 1750 3800 1790 1780 4456 1143 3180 3700 175tl ------------I--------•------II---------------II---------------Il---------------I rapacity Analyst/ Modules Vol/Aacr 0.74 0.18 D.OI 0.13 0.10 O.D2 0.15 0.30 0.10 0.15 0.19 0,0] CYit MOVeer *aaa r•sA rrrr Aaa!- Orean Timer 30.4 73.9 77.9 18.1 12.6 12.8 19.I 19.7 14.7 20.1 16.9 I5.8 Wlume/Cepr 0.77 0.59 0.15 0.59 0.72 0.18 0.77 0.61 0.81 0.88 0.72 0.09• belay/veh, 33.5 31.3 76.0 78.6 15.2 35.4 94.4 36.1 38.1 77.1 79.6 11.7 Vaar belAdjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh; 33.E 71,3 38.0 36.8 45.2 35.4 94.4 31.1 38.1 37.1 39.8 31.7 Los by Fiovea C- C C D+ II D+ D Dr D+ D+ D 3ta47kAvgq, 13 8 2 7 7 1 9 8 S 9 8 1 •a1lrAa Naaaf afaaaaaa H4rf a+aaaa•a1a•••!•a•AA#rr••a•rara of aaa laa•f aa•aaa+taaara• Nots: puaua rapertad So the number o! Dare per lane. TraEtiX 7.8-0713 {a) 2006 Doading Aseoe. Llcaneed co CITY OP CUPARTINO N N Bxiacing AM Felk Thu Oct 11, 7007 ilr18r 26 Page 30-1 Cupertino TIA IntPSaLCtiOn Calculakioae ' Level Of Service Cortputation Aepozt 7000 HCM Operaciana Method (Future Volume Alcarnativel ••••aa«•+aa!•aa.rarar•ra•a.aa••a as rafla+laraaraaaalaaf arataa•asafr Intersaccion 98 Stevens CraeR [. SAICH •aAalaa••aa•••a••a•a aa•aar•••••aaa•!•aaa•••••+•ra•a•a•re••ra «aa•aa Cycle (earl= 110 Critical Val./Cap. {R)r 0.375 nose Tiros (sea); 9 (Y+R~9.0 aec) Average Delay (aec/vahl+ 15.7 optimal Cye la, le~ Level DL 8ervi0ee H Aaar+aflN araara•+aa••Fa••a•••as•a•a•+a•1aH•\aaaaaaa•aaa•aaala•+aaa+#alraaf!#fa Approach; Noreh found sbueh Hound Eart Bound We9t Hound MOVa9reat; L T - P. L - T - R L - T - R L - T ~ R CoA trolr PtotaOCad Protected Pzoeacted Patmictad Righce: include include Lnciude Include Mia. Orsenr 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Loner, 0 0 0 0 0, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0' 0 0 0 3 0 1 -----°-----1----------•----II•--------------II----.......----II---------------I volume Nadaler 816e VO1; D 0 D 34 0 103 259 830 0 9 ,898 a0 oroweh Adjr 1.90 l,Da l.oo l.DO 1.oD l.oo i.oD l.oD 1.09 1.oD 1.90 l.Da Initial sae; D 0 D 34 0 163 269 830 0 0 699 60 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 PaaeerByVolr 0 0 9 0 p D 0 0 0 0 D 0 initial Futr 0 0 0 34 0 103 259 830 0 0 898 80 user Adjr l.oD 1.ao 1.DD i.oD l.o0 1.oD Loo i.DO i.oo LDD Loo 1.Do PHF Adjr 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.07 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 0,97 0.97 0.97 0.92 PHF Volumar D 0 0 37 0 111 I87 902 0 0 976 6S Redact vol; 0. 0 0 9 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 43 Reduced Vol; 0 0 0 37 0 77 797 907 0 0 976 77 PCE Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj+ 1.00 L.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 0 0 0 77 0 72 287 907 0 0 974 77 ..___..-----I---------------II-------.-.-----II---------------il--....._._...--I BicllYdtlOa FlOa ModUler sat/Lane: 1400 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjuBtmenc. 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.47 1.00 0.92 0.9] 1.00 0.92 Lancer 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 Yinal Sat.r 0 0 0 1750 0 1790 3750 5700 0 D 5700 1790 ------------I------°-------li---------------II....-----------II---------------I capacity Analyeia 14Dduler Vbl/Bat: 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.01 Crlt MOVa9r #-aa ar#! aaaa Green Tilrur 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10,0 44.5 91.0 0.0 0,0 48,9 46.9 Veltmu/Cap; 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,23 0.60 0.14 0.40 0.19 D,OD 0.90 0.40 0.03 Delay/vehr Q.0 0.0 0.0 49.8 0.0 47.9 25.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 71.3 18.1 Veer De3Adja 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/V~hr 0.,0 0.0 0.0 48.8 0.0 47.9 25,3 2.0 b.tl 0.0 77.3 18,4 LOB by MOVa, A A~ A D A D C 'A A A C'+ 8- RcM2kA.rgor o 0 0 1 0 1 , 1 6 0 6 D ra+aAaaAlraaAaraa aaa•••faa•fa•a+••ff•#aaarlaaaaaafaaa•a+Aalaa++aaar+ala •aasi afaa xoeer pueue reported !e the number oL taro per lane. TratELr 7.6.0719 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUPEP.TIAO ¢xi sting AH Pesk Thu occ 11, 2007 14r16,2d Page 11-1 Cupertino TIA InteraaCtion Calculatioo8 ' Level Ot Service Computation Report 7000 gC74 Operations Hechad (Future Volume Alternative) rrwraearw•ra•aw•rratawa#wa•aa+a•a•rawrwa rw•a••i•aloe+aaw•iaawrwawawaawaarrrawa~a Intsreeeci0n *7 stevens•Creak c Hrandlay •arw•awrw•ww••rfe•eawrw••e•arr•fa•arfw•wwa•ar rw•rafaraaaaaa•araarara•ar•iwwaarr• Cycle (sac). 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X), 0.343 Lose Time. (see)r 17 [TaR.4.0 sac) AvsYage Delay (sac/vihlr SB.2 Optimal Cycler 39 level Of 8esvicer 8- r• wa•a•afwa••••fa•wraw4araawaaaralrl#raawaaa•aa a••••a•aaaw•rei•rf#a•f a4ra Appzoaehr North ea,md South Hound Haat Hound Halt Bound Movement, L- T - R L- T - R L - T- R L - T- R -..-._--___-I_______________II----.-..--.-.._II_.________-._--II______________.I ConErolr Permitted Permitted Protected protected Rightse Include ihelude include 7otlude Min. Oreenr 7 10 30 7 1D 30 7 SO 30 ~ 7 10 10 Land, O l~ 0 0 1 0 1 0 O 1 1 0 3 0 L 1 0 7 7 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--_...---------I volume Module, . Saes Volr 14 39 7 36 9 32 150 661 70 29 B59 106 Orowth Aaj. l.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.oo 1.8o i.DD l.oD 1.aD l.oD l.o0 1.00 2nicial Haer 14 24 ] 36 9 22 150 661 10 29 95e 108 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 paraerHyVOle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial 91ttr 14 24 2 7d 9 27 150 661 20 7e aaa 10e veer Adj. l.DD l.oD 1.00 l.DO i.oo 1-0o i:oo l.DO l.DD l.oo l.ao l.Da pEF Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 D-92 0_92 0.92 0.93 0-92 PHR VOlumer li 26 7 39 IO 24 163 719 22 30 933 117 Radutt Valr 0 0 2 0 0 16 0 0 9 D 0 13 Reduced Vblr 14 2b 0 ]9 10 9 163 71e 13 30 9]3 107 pCR Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HLp Adjr 1.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 i.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.OD 1.00 Final Vol.: 18 16 0 39 30 9 163 719 13 30 933 103 --_----.----I---------------II---.-----------II.---------_----I I_»..---.-..----I SatureEion Floe Module. 880/LaAer 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 Adjurtrtxnt, 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.95 Lenrsr 0.3T 0,63 1.00 O.aO 0.20 1.00 S.OD 7.00 1.00 1.00 7.99 0.31 FlnaL 8at.r 663 113? 1750 1410 360 1790 1750 $700 1750 1750 5045 SS4 --_.....----I---------------II---------------II-----------=---II---------------I capacLty Analysis Ma7uler Vol/9at, 0.07 0.02 D•DO 0.03. 0.63 0.01 0.09 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.19 Crit HOW 91 arwa aaa• rare c)reen Timor 30.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 29.$ 59.5 56.5 19.5 53.5 56.5 Volume/Cap. 0.20 0.75 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.35 0.74 0.01 0.06 0.35 0.38 Delay/Vah, 50.2 50.2 45.5 51.3 91.3 46.4 14.5 14.0 12.7 30.7 13.1 15'.1 veer DelAdj, l.oo l.oo l.oo i.aD i.DD l.ao l.o0 1.oD I.Da I.DO l.oD 3.oD AdjDal/Vahr 5b.2 80.7 45.5 51.3 81.3 46.4 31.5 14.0 17.2 30.2 15.1 iS.i LO8 by Move, D D D b- 'D- D C- 8 8 ~ B_ RC)42kAvgQe a a 0 a 7 0 B 4 0 1 7 7 rfigfr•aarawr•rww wwawraarawwawr•••aa•••r.•e•ri•IwHwwawrwrfwwffw•wrrrrrwraiaara NOtar Ouaue reported it the number o2 Cara per lane. Trattlx 7.8.0715 (C) 2006 Dowling Aeaoc. Licennd to CITY OF CU9fiP.TINO N N Existing AM Peak Thu OCE 11, 2007 14, Sd=2fi page 12-1 Cupertino TIR IOterseccion Calculatiana LpVel OZ 8arv1C! COmpuCeCiOR RepOYC 2000 Had operations Method IFutuYa Vo1Wae Alternative) arra•Haf•Hlaawawfrr if aaa••w•a••firawraaaraiwaa•a•ra•••r•a•aafaa4w•whafwf •frawr Interaaction ae 6teliiog t< Oreenleat •w•awaa ar •a Na law awwraa N a••r••a • •N•u•r•a r•r •a riwrff Nwawar raw•a HawaHHaaH r Cycle (sec), 100 CrL tieal vol./Cap.(%), 0.599 Lose Time Isec}, i7 [FrR.4.0 eat) Average Delay (aeo/vehlr 13.7 Optimal Cycles 4tl Leval 0! 9ervieer 8 aalf•iawawrawlarwaaa to wra rawwwl•af rffff•fif•afaffwwwwaaaNwriww•!•}awwrra ra•aaww Approach, North Hound South Hound Eaac Bound Hest Hound MOVemenCr L- T - A L - T - R L T- P. L - T - R -----._.-.--I--------°------II---------------II-..-...--...---II---------_.----I Cmtrel, permitted Permitted permitted Patmietad Rights, Include Include include Include rein. Ozeenr 7 l0 l0 7 10 10 7 So la 7 10 10 honer, 0 0 ll 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 D ...---------I--------------=IS--•------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Modular Hasa Voi, 31 656 24 ~9 919 90 109 70 31 34 35 37 Growth Adj: i.oD i.oD l.DO l.oD l.Da i.aD 1.oa l.oo l.oD 1.00 l.oD i.oa Initial B9er 14 656 74 9 S2S 60 109 20 37 34 15 32 Added v01, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Fa99erEyvol, v D o D D D D 0 D o D o Initial Fuc, 14 656 74 9 515 50 109 70 31 34 15 12 Veer Adjr 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 L.00 3.00 1.00 PRF Adj, 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 PRF Volumrr 15 713 26 10 560 54 lib 22 35 37 16 35 Arduet Yol, a 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 24 RaduCe4 VO1: 15 717 25 10 560 B1 S1B 22 26 37 16 11 pCE Adj: I.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0a I.DO 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HLF Adjr 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final VO1.: 15 713 2S 10 580 51 11B Z2 25 37 ZB 11 ..---_--.---i---------------II---------------II--.........----li-.----------.--I Saturation Flow Modules fiat/Loner 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190a 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdivstmanEs 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,97 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 L6IIear 0.02 095 0-03 0.02 0.90 0.00 0.70 O.i3 0.17 0.59 0.25 0.17 Final bat-e 3S 1696 S9 26 1579 145 1234 726 2a9 1010 ;46 295 ------------I------------•--II---------------II---------------II---------------f Capacity Analyair Modular Vol/Satr 0.47 0.43 0.13 0.35 0.35 0.75 0.10 0.10 0.1a 0.94 0.09 O.DS Crit Moves, rfwa •aw: Oreen Time, 77.0 72.0 73.0 72.0 77.0 77.0 I6.0 16.0 SB.O 16.0 16.0 16.0 VOluma/Capr 0.60 0.60 O.bO 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.60 0.60 a.60 0.13 0.17 0.73 Dalay/Vehr 9'_0 9.0 9.9 7.5 7.5 7.5 4B.1 4e.1 48.1 3B.S 3B.a 79.5 veer aelAdj, l.DO 3.00 1,oa i.aD z.oa l.oo i.oa l.DO 1.00 l.oo Loo i.DD AdjDll/Vehr 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.9 7.5 7.5 46.1 4a .1 46.1 36.5 35.5 38.5 ID6 by Move, A 'n A A A A D' D D Da D+ D 7{CAflkAvgp, 13 13 13 9 9 ! f 6 6 3 7 2 •awaaaawlfaawarrfwlawawwaaa•awaaa••raaw Hwrarafff wf waaa•f Rfwrawawaia}lwe4Ailal4R Rotas guava reported Sa the number oI Cara per lane. Traffix 7.d.071S iol 7006 Dowling Aa80C. Licensed to CITY OF COp8RT3H0 Baieting AH Peak Thu Occ 11, 2007 14 i18s28 Yage 13-1 Cupertino TIA Incereeccian CelculatiOae , Leval Of Service COf(IpUtlClOYI Report 2000 RQ4 Operations Me Chob !Future Volume Alternative) r ••assess•••r.faaaaaaaararrrrarrrarrarr rases raRaaarlrrf a•frararaa rrf.aaf111ra Intersection 89 Stalling i McCla]San raa•••a+Ra}1111ar1faraa•aara••R•f••rfraaafa as aa•rfaa#aAarA4aaA•af raaaaaaaaaaRaa• Cycle Iaecls 90 Crieical Vol./Cap. (JC)+ 0.879 LD9a T1ma tees!: 17 (Y+Rr4.0 see) Average Daley (aec/vehl: 36.5 Op[imal Cycle, as Level OP 5ervicas D+~ aa•a.af••arraaaaaraara•wrw•r••arra•aararar+frara•f+a•a•ara•a r•aa•a••••aa•ara•ara Approecha North Sfluhd south 7omrd seat Bound Wask sound MOVerM1e[It f L- T~- R L - T -. P. L- T- R L- T- R Centrals PYOteCtied. YLOGCted Protected Protested Rightas Include Include Tnalude Tncluda Min. Greens 7 SO 10 7 10 10 7 10 . 10 7 1a 10 Ieneas 1 0 1 1 O 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Vnlurna Module s Baas VOls 113 651 75 113 69 89 792 2<9 [2 56 794 169 Rrovtlr Adjr i.oD 1.aD 1.DD l.oa 1.DD 1.ao l.oD I.DD i.On 1.00 I.DD 1.DD Initial Baer 213 551 73 113 89 69 292 749 (1 58 294 159 Added Vols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ya9sarByvols 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 Lnitlal Puts 213 551 78 113 69 89 292 299. 41 S6 294 159 Veer Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 i.OR 1.00 1.00 P}ff Adj. 0.92 0-92 0-91 0.9] 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.91 0,92 0.97 O.D2 PRP volumes 23] 599 87 123 75 76 317 771 45 81 330 173 ReduOt VOIr a 0 57 0 0 36 0 0 15 D~ D 141 Reduced Volr 7I7 599 3S 17) 75 39 317 771 •70 61 I30 33 P~ Idi'r L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1-00 1-00 14LP Adjr 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pinal Vol.r 731 699 76 137 75 78 317 271 30 81 330 31 Saturation F1sTV WOdulas Bat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19D0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adl uetmancr 0.9i 0.97 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.96 0.92 1.00 0.97 Lancer 1.D0 1.87 0.09' 1.00 I.30 0-70 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.DD Final 8at_r 1750 3554 U 8 1750 1433 1186 1750 I67J 177 1750 1900 1750 Capaoicy Analysts Modular VO1/eats 0.13 0.17 D. 17 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.17 0.17 Grit Ffovear +arr f••a •*•• Groan Times 17.1 13.3 11.3 9.3 14.4 14.4 24.0 31.8 31.8 VOltiak/Cap r, O.b9 0.68 0.88 0.68 0.19 0.19 0.68 0.47 0.47 Daley/Vehr 45.1 34.8 34..8 57.5 33.4 33.4 37.1 18.3 75.3 Veer DalAdjs 1.00 1.00 1.D0 ].00 1.00 1.00 1-OD 1.00 1.Od AdjDel/Veh: 46.1 31.8 34.e 57.5 33.4 ]3-4 37.2 19.3 35.3 Lp8 h'1r 36over D C- C- 'B+ C- C- D+ C 8CM3kAVgpr a 4~ 9 S 7 1 10 7 7 ••aarra•rafrar+lraaraafafa•r+ra aw •aaaaaaaaf aa•a a•wraR rffarH r. 310ta1 Queue reported is the number of care per Iane. 0.03 0.17 0:01. I4.7 73.3 71.3 D.31 0.68 0.07 34.3 38.3 36.1 1_00 1.00 1.00 34.3 38.3 19.2 -C C- D+ 7 9 1 rrfrlaf •aflrararaf Traffix 7.8,0718 (c) 1006 DON11n$~AeeOC. Liaanaad to C1TY DF CUPSRTI1tD N_ i N V 6xieitng PM Peak Thu Oct 11, 1007 19,30,33 page 1-1 Cupertino TIA Sntsresedoa Calculations 6cenario P.eport Boanario. Pxisitag PH Peak Command. 3:xisting « ATI t Pro3 •et AM volume= &ciacing Pn Peak Roux (isometry, bxiecipp PM IrtpaCt Pla, DlEettlt SmpaCC t!a Trip Denaration~ Non: Trip DSetribution, Daily Pathsr netault Datha Rattea, i1e[wlt H.euta^ Configuratiaa~ Ds[ault Configuration TraPtix 7.8.0715 lU 7006 Dowling Aaeoe. Licensed to CSTY Ox CUP14tT2N0 N N Sxiaitng PM Peak Thu Oct 1!, 2007 14.30:32 Page 2-1 Cupertino TIA Intsreection CalCUlatione Trip Diatributi0it tteport Percent of Trips nsily To oecea 1 Z 3 4 S 6 Eons ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.0 30.0 b.0 7.0 3.0 1b.D Traffix 7.a.0715 (e! ]006 Dowling AseOC. LicanaaC t0 CYT't OP CDPERTSND Pxiaicdq P14 Paak Thu Occ 11, 10D7 1470.]7 Page 3-1 CuPercino T7A Intezea9cion Caloulacione Turning Movement Report None voluA~e Northbound Southbound Basebound Maetbarmd Toca1 type Laft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thtu Right Lett Thru. Right Volume #i 6tevens Creek i Bubb Rd Base 97 19 477 •84 19 14 24 700 139 509 6c0 a4 •2402 Aaa:d o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 Total 93 19 077 84 1~ 14 19 700 I39 509 660 84 2B02 #2 Stevens Greek i Mary Ave lase' 243 11 46 148 38 120 798 1524 250 179 965 YOB 193) Added 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 o D 0 0 0 0 Total 245 11 {6 148 3e 120 298 1524 150 179 969 308 3973 #3 9tevena Creak i 88 BS Ranpa Base 0 D 0 967 8 751 0 879 17.7 723 639 0 3739 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TCtil 0 0 0 967 6 751 0 679 173 323 639 0 3738 #1 5tavanb Creak i NB 89 Aan~B BaBa 54 265 0 ISB 1 306 091 1505 0 0 726 809 4358 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 D D 0 0 Total 54 205 0 '250 1 306 493 1505 0 O 726 809 4355 A8 0tav4na Creak i etelling Rd Bane 339 344 363 349 847 236 247 776 216 525 1051 247 8203 Added 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Total b29 394 Jai 349. 547 236 247 T36 218 535 105.7 747, 5203 #6 Stevens Creak F SAICB Bata D 0 0 9c 0 187 337 1673 0 0 1118 60 3421 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1bta1 0 0 0 98 0 187 337 1623 D O 1118 8a 3621 *T 8tavem Creak i Braadley ee9e 70 16 /0 IBS 16 111 441 1294 53 105 1123 107 7667 Adaaa o a o o D o 0 0 o a v 0 0 Tctel 70 ie a0 289 18 111 443 1294 63 1D5 1117 107 3687 R8 Btellinq a Greenleaf Base 1tl SB7 12 21 886 35 55 11 25 24 21 29 1699 Added o 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a Total 18 587 12 21 B6B 39 55 13 18 24 21 34 1899 R9 Stelling L MCCiallaa ' Base 128 231 72 '330 860 163 174 414 116' 133 376 154 2891 Added D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Total 126 274 71 330 564 163 174 411 129 133 376 194 2891 Tratfix 7.8.0718 (o) 7008 Dowling Aaeae. Lieanaad to CITY OF CVPRRTINO N N (O Pxiaitng PM Paak Thu Oct 11, Soo? 14r70r32 Page 4-1 Cupertino 27A Snteraection Caleula time - Impact Anaiysta Rapprt Laval Of Bervioa intersection ease Future Cbanga ' Dsl/ v/ Dal/ v/ is LOB Veh C LOB Vah C 7e 1 6GWln8 Creek F BDbb Rd C 27.4 0.6oD C 27.4 9.600 + 0.000 D/V / 2 Stevens Creak i Mary Ave C 16.7 0.584 C 29.7 0-809 + 0.000 D/V 8 3 Stevens Creek i Se 0S Reuq+a C 30.5 0.756 C 30.5 0.759 + 0.000 D/V 4S 9 8tevene Creak i MB e5 Raffia C- 23.1 0.647 C- 33.1 0.647 + 0.000 D/V 5 Stevens Creak & Stalling Ad D 42.2 0.631 D~ 42.2 O.B31 ~+ 0.900 D/V r B 5tevane Creak i 9AICH ~ B 15.3.0.483 B 15.3 0.487 + 0.900 D/V w 7 Bcev4ots Creek i Brandley C- 32.4 0.702 C- 31.4 0.782 + 0.000 D/V # 0 eta}ling F Greenleaf B+ 11.9 0.732 8+ 11.9 0.732 + 0.000 D/V # 9 8telling F McClellan D4 37.7 0.755 D+ 37.7 0.795 + 0.000 DN Trtffix 7.8.0715 (c~ 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed co CIT7 OP CUPBRTINO 9risitng PH Peak ~ Thu Oct 11, 7007 14:30.32 Page 5-1 Cupertino TIA Intaraeccion Caloulaciona Level Ot 8arvloa COmpVCati00 RapOrt 7000 HCH Oparationa Method (Future volume Alternative) faawfrwarffa•+frwaaaa•ra•aaraawa•aawaw•aaaraaaaaar«rararaarlwffaraal •faaaarf of rf intereaction el strvene creek L Buhh Rd r•raaaaaa•aaaaa•araaa aaaaaa+aa•aaraaaaraaraaaara«a r.a aa+aaraaara«+af ra+raaaaa•a• CyC la (rea)r 110 Critical vol./Cap_(x)r 0.800 LOae Tima (see). 12 (YrR•a.0 rat) Avaraga Delay (eeC/veh)s 27.[ Optimal Cyela, 49 Level Of sarvicaa C rra ra aaaaaawaa•a•aaaaaaraa••aa•aaaara••a•aaaaa•a•aaaraarra afaa••«r«aaaaaaaaarr•« Approach. North Sound South Bound Casc iaatnd Neat Rortnd Hwamane a L- 2 - A L- T- R L - T - R L- T- R Control. Split phase Split phara Proeaocad protected Righter wl Ynclvda Include include Nin. Oreanr 7 10 SO 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 SO 10 Lama r 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Modular Baaa volr 93 19 477 64 19 14 34 700 lI9 809 660 94 6roVth Atha 1_OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1-OD 1-DO 1-DD 1.00 Initial Hasa 93 19 477 64 19 14 74 7po 139 909 680 94 Added Volr 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PaatarByVOlr 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initldl Putr 43 19 477 64 19 14 24 700 L79 509 460 94 Veer Adlr 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 2.00 1.00 91(p Adj+ 0.92 0,91 0.97 0,-2 0,91 0.91 0.97 O.B2 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF VOlumer 101 11 515 70 21 1S 26 761 151 953 717 91 Aeduec vole 0 0 225 0 0 13 0 0 106 D 0 9 Reduced Vola 101 21 793 70 71 7 34 761 a5 b53 717 51 PCR Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 MLP Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 201 31 293 70 71 1 74 751- 48 953 717 t1 SatULAC10n OM tbdvlaa Sac/Lamer 2900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 Aajuerlnantr 0.95 0.95 0.8] 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.98 0,9b Laaaar 0.83 0.17 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 3.00 1.79 0.71 Final 9at.r 1495 305 3290 L750 3900 1750 2750 3900 1750 3150 3310 381 Cbpaeiey Ane ysia Nodular VO1/6atr 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.70 0.03 0.25 0.23 6.17 Crlt MOVeer raa• afar aar• agar Oreear Siawa 13.4 13.4 45.3 10.0 10.0 10.0 17.0 39.7 39.7 34.! 57.6 57.6 Volama/Cape 0.55 0.55 0.31 0.44 0.13 0.01 O.LD O.SB 0.07 O.bb 0,11 0.41 Delay/Vab+ bb.3 65.1 19.9 55.8 47.9 95.7 40.7 79.7 73.3 33.4 15.6 16.6 Ueer DelAd3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1_p0 1_00 1.00 1-00 1_00 1.00 AdjDa1/Vah: 55.3 55.2 19.9 55.8 47.4 45.7 40.7 39.7 33.3 33.4 16.5 16.6 FAS by MoYal 1:• 8+ 'B- 7i+ D D D r C C• B RCM3kAvgpa 5 5 4 3 1 D 1 10 1 10 5 8 aaawer•a rwraarwaf rarrawralraa afaareaw«faf•a•raais •frrlaaar•rf raver rwrf N•fw-•rfr• NoOer Guava repOYtad la t4a number of tare per laaa_ 1YeE11x 7.6.0715 (ei 2006 Dovrling Aaron. Licatnad to QTY OB CU9BRTINO N_ r W O Exisltng PM Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 14:30:32 Page 6-1 Cupertino TIA 3ncersaeeian Caleulationa Laval Of 6arvica Computation Report 2000 HCH Oparatioaa Method (Poture Volume Altarnativai aaH Nwwof MaH rwvN•aHrHa ralr a«H awf f • wa rwawrawwaaf aMf Graf rwf Rf aa+«e«rrawaf InterreetiOn (k3 strvene creek 4 Mary AVe Cycle (ant)s 9D Critical VoI./Cap.lxl: 0.589 L06e Time (6eclr 12 (Y.R•4.0 aec~ Average Delay (sac/vahlr ~ 26.7 Optimal Cyolea 46 Level Of 9ervicer C •aa•r•ar•e•uaaf •aaar•••••ra ••rra••aaa•ar of a••aara«•ara••rsr•r••••a•••«••a••wa Appxoachr North coved South Bound Saat Bound Naat Bound Mrnremant, L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R Concrolr protected protected prot4w:ted ptoteOtad 8lghtsr Include Include Include Include Hitt. OraQlr 7 iD 16 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 LO 10 Lmatr 2 0 0 1 0, 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 Volume Hodulaa Base Vol: 249 11 a6 149 3e t2D 298 253d 150 179 965 108 Orawth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Baas 249 I1 4fi 149 38 110 298 1524 250 179 465 108 Added vol.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 PaeeerByVOla 0 0 0 0 D 0 0~ 0 0 0 D 0 LOitlal Ytrtr 14b 11 46 149 3B 120 296 1514 150 779 965 108 Osar Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 PRP Adj. 0.97 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.41 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 pAp' Volumer 266 12 50 162 41 190 934 1657 172 199 104! 117 Redvat Volr 0 0 41 0 0 109 0 0 181 O 0 90 P.aduead Yola 2b6 12 9 162 41 15 324 L657 91 195 1049 1T pCi Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 His Adjr 1.oD L.DO l.DD L.oo l.o0 1.oD l.DO l.DD l.oD 1.vD l.DD 1.Do pinal Vol.r .266 12 9 lag 41 7E J24 1897 91 199 1049 77 Baturacfoo plow Modular Sat/Lamer 1900 1900 ia0o 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjuetmanCr 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.92 9.92 1.00 0.92 Ianara 1,00 0.57 0.41 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1_00 Final Sat.a 3150 1027 773 1750 1900 1750 2750 5700 1760 1750 9700 1750 Capseity Analysfr Module. Y01/Batr 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.11 0.18 0.07 Crlt MovBar ara• ee•r wawa rarr Organ Time: 9.8 10.0 10.0 12.7 11.9 17.9 77.7 10.0 40.0 15_3 37.6 77,8 Voltmre/Cap, 0.77 0.10 0.10 O.b5 0.15 0.10 0.60 0.85 0.12 0.6b 0.60 O.OS Dalay/Vehr 81.8 37.0 17.0 49.3 39.9 39.3 31.3 20.9 15.0 49.8 28.1 7I.2 VEer DalAdjc L.00 1,04 S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.OD 1-00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vahr 84,8 37.4 37.0 49.7 14.9 d4 ,3 32.3 20.9 15.0 45.8 78.1 12.3 LD5 ty Move. D- D+ D+ D C= C- C C+ 8 D C RQ43kAVgQr 8 1 1 6 1 1 9 13 2 7 9 1 fla af.-wrrra•wre•f aara••••aa.ara•r•rwawf•af ww•w•ar•wa waaaa«awwa«•arrawr«ra•rrwaw xotea Guava reported is eha nua4rar of eerr per lama. Traffix 7.5.0719 (c3 3006 Dowling Asaoe. Licenasd to CITY OP CUPBATINO Fxifltrig PM Pack Thu Occ 11, 9007 lar3Dr33 Fage 7-1 Cupertino TIA Intersection Calculations Laval D! Service Computation Report x000 NCM Operations Method (FLLLLra Volume Alternative) aaraaRrtr+•raraaalwfawratrawraa•rraaarraaaawart lraawlaaalraaaawfa HaraaYarraaara Incereaccion A3 Stevens Creek t 5B 85 Ratr~s a•rra•ar•1flaarNrrw•4f MaawRaff a•raf araatrf Rrrwrrrtwaaarrafaawar affafaraarrwr•1 Cycle (sea): 110 Critieal vol./Cap.fx7r 0.7x5 Loss Time (each 9 (YaR.4.0 sacy Avaraga Delay (sec/veh)r 30.5 Optimal Cycle, it Gavel Ot Selvicer C aaaa.arrara•ra aaaM+aa•aawrRarrra•aa.a+ara•aaae ra•+•sar.wraaare Rara •wafraaaawrwa Approach: North sound south Bovnd 3;sat Bound Nest Bond Movements L- T - R L- T- A L- T- R L - T- P. ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--- Cantrolr Protected FrotaCtad Farrtdttad ------------{ Protested Aighta, include 2ncluda Include YnC1Ude Min. tlraene 7 SD _ 10 7 'IO 10 7 10 ~ 10 7 1D 30 Lama r 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 Volume Modulo: ' Base VOlr 0 0 0 987 8 751 0 879 173 313 839 0 Growth Adjt 1.oa l.oa i.oo l.oa l.oD 1.OD S.DD l.DO l.aD 1.00 1.DO l.oo Initial Rse: 0 0 0 957 fi 751 0 879 173 323 639 0 Added Yol r 0 0 D 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 paasarsyvolr D D o o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial 1!Utr 0 0 0 957 6 751 0 879 173 323 539 0 user Adjr 1•DO l.oD l.ae l.oD 1.00 i.oa i,oD l.oo l.oa l.ao i.DD l.oa PHF Adjr 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 pAF volvner 0 0 0 1051 7 e18 D 955 168 151 595 0 lladunt Volr O D 0 D 0 28 0 0 iS6 0 0 0 Aadunad Volr 0 D O 1051 7 709 0 995 31 351 898 D PC6 Adjr 1.00 1.00 S.Otl 1.00 1-00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 MLV Aajr 1.DO L.oo l.DO l.oD l.ao 1,ao 1.0o i.DO l..aD. 1.0o i.oo 1.0D Pinal Yol,r 0 a 0 1051 7 788 0 955 39 351 895 0 ------------I---------------IE---------------II---------------li----•----------I Saeuration Plow Maduins Sat /Loner 1800 190D 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 Aajuaenontr 0.91 1.00 6.92 0.07 0.95 0.91 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1-00 0.92 LaAOSr a,aD D.DO a.oo 2.98 0.01 l.oa D.oo 3.ei o.14 a.DD x.Da a.DD Final gat-. 0 0 0 4919 21 1740 0 7156 247 3190 3800 0 _---...-.---I---------------II--------...--.-II---_-_---_-----II------__-----.-I Capacity Analysis Modular Vol/Satr 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.49 0,00 0,13 0.13 0.11 O,La 0-0a Cris Mouser aara aa•a walla Green Timer 0.0 0.0 D.D es .6 55.8 85.6 0.0 19-2 19.1 16-1 35-4 0-0 Volume/Capr 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.J5 0.75 0.76 0.00 0.78 D.76 0.75 0.57 0.06 Delsy/Vahr 0.0 0.D 0.0 11.7 11.7 11.4 D.D 67.3 47.3 55.9 32.9 0.0 Uset DelMljr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Vahr O,D 0.0 0.0 11.7 11.7 71.1 0.0 47.3 67.3 55.9 J1.4 0.0 LOS by Mwa r A A A Ba 8+ C. A D' D 8•R C- BCM2kAVp()r 0 0 0 7 7 29 0 10 30 8 10 0 HRNNHwwaaf MHaH aaMawrwwRwaar rrwaa aa4wrrf arta•M a••a•H N•wraw•rM MaaaaH Motor queue repOZted is the number o! carp per lane. Trattix 7.8.0713 (o) 2005 DDNling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OP CUBBRTINO N CJ Sxisicnp FM Peak Thu Oct 11, 3007 14r30r72 Yafla 8-1 CupezCino TYA In ceraeccioa CalculacionH Ltvl1 OE SlN1Ce CDIS~Ute Clop RapOit ]000 ACM Operations~Maehod (Future Volume ASternative} raarN•a•a•aataYt}wf rwrf•rra Re••4a•rtrRaaarffaaa•r}••a•araalrwa•alaaawaarlaaaala IAClYBBCtlOn Aa 9teVEn¢ Creek & NB 85 Ranma •aR1a•a•w•wawa•aaRa+arraRraaaaaaaa+a•taro{aaaaaRaaa•aa}traar•rwlraatra+Raafrrw•a Cycle (se03r 110 Critical Vol./Cap.IX), 0.647 Loss Tlma (9EC)r 12 (Y+R=9.0 eaC) Average Delay (slc/vah)r 33.1 Optimal Cycle: 54 Level OE Services C- rrraaar•rwaw a•awaraarwarwraa•ar•a•af+arww•••aawrr of+rarawr•r. ••r•trr•rea•raaata AppcxfacAr North Bound South Hound bast Hound Nest 8auad Movement: L- T - R G - T - ft L- T- R L T- R ------------I---------------II--•--------°--II---------------II-------..---•--I controls Split Phase Split Phase, Protected Fezmittad RiphtBr Include Include zneiude Ignoro Min. Oreenr 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 SO l0 7 SO SO Lsnerr 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 9 0 3 0 0 0 D 3 0 1 Volume Modular Daaa Yolr 54 205 0 158 1 301 491 1509 0 0 776 809 Growth Adlr 1.00 1.00 i.DD 1_DO I.DD i.oo l.DD l.DD 1.aD 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Baer 54 905 0 258 1 306 491 SS05 0 0 776 809 Added Vol: o D 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PaBSerByVOlr 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut. 54 105 0 258 1 306 691 1505 0 0 726 809 veer Aajr i.oD l.ao 1.00 1. DO 1.00 l.oD i.DO l.oD I.oD i.DO 1.00 0.00 9AF Adje D.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 D.97 0.91 0,92 0.91 0.92 D.92 0.92 0.00 PFSF ~VOlumer 99 223 D 290 1 333 534 1636 0 0 789 0 Redact Volr 0 D a 0 0 205 0 O 0 0 0 D Reduced VOlr 39 ]23 D 280 ' 1 118 539 1fi 3fi D 0 789 0 PC6 Adjr 1.00 1.00 L.oO~ 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 0.00 MLP Adjr 1.0o i.oo i.oD 1.00 l.o0 1.oD l.DO 1-oD i.DO 1.DD I.DD D.oo FSDal VO1-r 59 2]3 0 280 1 128 934 1638 0 O 789 D -------.____I------------•--II---------------II---------------ll---------...---i saturation Flow Moaulss eat/Lanes 1900 1900 1000 1400 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 19D0 Adj115tm@nts 0.93 0.98 0.91 0.93 O.BS D.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.43 1.87 0.00 0.80 0.01 1.19 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.D0 1.00 Final Bat.r 771 2968 0 1654 6 2081 3150 5700 0 0 570D 1750 ------------I---------------fl---------------II-----...-------II---------- -I Capacity Analysis Modulo, Vol/9atr O.OB a.Da 0.00 0-19 0.19 0.06 0-17 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 C71t Move9r •••• »r• »wfe err aYeen Time. 12.9 12.9 D.0 32.e 62.9 32.6 29.9 51.3 0.0 0.0 aa.5 0.0 VolumalCapr 0'.18 D.sB 0.00 0.5B 0.65 0-7I 0-55 0.60 0.00 0-00 0.65 0-00 Delay/Nabs 53.5 53.6 9.0 36.7 18.7 29.1 60.0 72.2 D.0 0.0 47.1 0.0 Vssr DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1-QO 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vahr 53.6 93.8 0.0 20.7 78.7 79.1 40.0 27.7 0.0 0.0 41.1 O-0_ L08 by Mover D- D- A Da Ow C D Ca A A' D RUT2kAvgpe 6 6 0 it I1 3 ID it 0 0 ! 0 ataaaa as as aaala•Rarwataraaaaa err Nafaa}r Nlrlaaa ar aaaalarart•a•N rrat of at•!•flwa Noter Queue reported is the number of can per lane. Tratfix 7.8.O71b (C} 2005 DOwllag AeeOC. Licensed to CITY OP CUPGRTINO Rx191Cng PM Peak Thu Dcc 11, 1007 14,30.37 Page 9-1 Cupertino TIA Intersection Cat Nlatioaa Laval Or 9azvica Cor~utacian Report ' 2000 NCM opera tionr Msthad (Future Volvma AItsrnatlw) a •pa•.•a•• .ar »arp.p•parawr+waaa•a p•p•r.~e•R«p .rear rarr••ar.• 7ntazaection ASaStavane Creek 6 Scelling Rd sap•p arl peaa•aeaarrwaaaaa•aaa•faa••••ar paaaaa{•aaH paaaaaaa•ataafw•aawrarww Cycle (acc)t 80 Critical YO1./Cap. (Y)~ 0.931 Inaa Time laec)r 12 IY+R.4.0 aecl Awrega Oalsy (sae/veh), 42.7 Optimal Cycler 61 Level o[ Sazvicar D ap• •r•apa•eraaf aarw•r••aa•{•aa+a•pap p•H•K laaaa«p•aaia+a•paaaa•ar•i•a• Approach<. 9rezth Hound 6autb bound East Round Hest Hound MOVement r L- T- A L- T - R L- T - A L - T - R Controlr Fzotaeted Protected Protected Protected Aightsr Include Include include Include Min. 8raenr 7 70 30 7 10 10 7 10 30 7 30 30 Lanes, 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 7 0 1 l 0 7 i 6 7 0 3 0 1 --•---------I---------------il---------------II----------.._--11------------.---i Volume Modular Baca Vol, 32! 344 383 349 547 135 747 736 718 595 1093 147 crcxth Adj, S.DD l.o0 1.0o i.DO 1.00 1-0o i.oo l.o0 1.00 1.00 i.oo i.oo Initial Hsa, 319 344 363 749 517 739 247 736 116 575 1653 247 Added VOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pa88aYByVOle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Initial itrt, 77! 144 363 749 547 735 797 738 216 535 1053 247 User Adj, 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I~60 1.00 1.00 1.00 PNF Adjx 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.93 0.01 0.-] PNF VOluDgr 768 374 799 37! 595 755 166 600 737 587 1145 268 Reduct Yoir 0 0 317 0 0 207 0 0 S9 0 0 109 Raduoad Volr 759 374 63 779 595 44 788 800 171 567 x149 63 PCE Adj, 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Aajr i.oD l.DO 'i.DO l.DO l~.DD l.oD i.oo 1.Da S.oD 1.60 l.oo l.oo Final Vol.r 358 374 83 379 595 IB 268 BOO 179 .887 1148 83 ..----------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I 8aturatioa flow Nodule. Sat/Lava: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I9D0 1000 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 Adj LL9tmentr 0.9] 1.00 0_97 0_97 1_00 0.42 0.91 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00' 0.97 Lauasr 1.00 2.00 1.00 1,00 2.00 1.00 1.00 7.47 0.87 7.00 6.00 1.00 Final Stt.r 1750 3600 1750 1750 7600 1758 1750 4980 1019 ]190 5700 1750 _---_----___I---------------II--....-..--.-_.ll---------------11-----.-...--.--I Cspaoity Analycia Module: Vol/5atr 0.70 0.10 0.05 0.27 0.16 0.03 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.70 0.04 Crit Moveer •ar• aaar +aa• rr•f Green Timaa 22.1 17.7 33.2 15.8 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 20.0 27.7 77.1 volume/Cape 0.83 0.67 0.33 0.78 0.13 0.15 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.63 D,B2 0.15 Dllay/vahr 49.0 4].R 37.6 79.] 45.0 31.4 55.1 40.9 40.9 44.4 37.6 77.3 Veer DelAdjr 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.DO L.00 1_OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 Adj Dal/VWr 49.0 47.5 37.6 39.3 46.0 71.4 55.1 40.9 40.9 44.4 37.6 77.3 L09 by Mover D D D+ D D C F+ ~D b D Da RCMZkAVgQr 17 B 2 12 11 1 10 I1 11 12 11 7 a•arlflafrawara•aaR•a aaNfaaa paw•prr•fr•a•••a•a+f••a•aa•H pt{a•tat•ra1{wawe!• Noter queue repOreed ie eha nun@3ar of oars per lava. TzatEix 7.8.0715 (e) 2000 Dawl lag Assoc. Licanaed co CITY OF CUPBRTINV N W N 6xisitng PM Peak Thu OCt Ll, 2007 14r30r33 Page 30-1 Cupertino TYA 3nCeraection Calculations Lawl OS Service Computation Report 3000 A[N Opezetl0na Method (94tuze volurD• Altamatlvel a•r•a:refw•a••a•s+aapx.• tfp aarwR•eaa•wa•r.rp•aaapfp •arip as p•a•p a•ra•a•a• IncerseCtion A6 9tewne Creek A SAICH aaa•praaflaraf•ffaawap••ra••R••a laara•rf•aaaaaala 4{tiara•aa asa111a1{{•arfaraa• Cycle (saclr 110 Critical•VOl./Cap. (X)r O.a 83 Lora Ttme foeClr 9 (Y+A.4.0 sac) Average Delay (reC/wh)r 15.3 Dpeimal Cyeiae 36 Leval OS Serviear D a raa paa•aapawapaa•pfaaaa••pappw• ap•p as •pa•• ra aa••• aaaa aa+aarf • f •p•p• Approach- North Bovnd 9ouch Hound Bast Bound wect Sound Movement r L- T - R L - T - R L- T - P. L- T - R ---_-_______I_______________II--.-.---------_II-_-____________ll_____---_..-.__I Can eeol, Protected Pretested Protected Permitted Aightar Include Include include Include Min. Graeni 7 l0 70 ~ 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 30 10 Lanes. 0 tl D 0 0, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ------------I--...._--------II-°--°--------li------°-------il-°----_._._...I Volume Nodular 7esa Volr 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 762] 0 0 1119 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_DO 1.00 Initial Bass D 0 0 98 0 187 337 162] 0 0 1119 60 Added Val. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PaaearlyVO1, D D 0 0 0 0 o D 0 0 0 0 initial Putr 0 0 D 96 0 187 337 167] 0 a 1119 60 Uear Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DHF Adj: 0.91 0.97 0.87 0.82 0.17 0.P2 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 PNF Volwrer 0 0 0 104 0 203 766 1764 0 0 1215 88 Reduct Vol, 0 0 D 0 0 166 0 0 0 D 0 42 Reduced Volt 0 0 0 104 0 ,37 38G 1764 0 0 1215 73 PCB Adjr 1.00 1,00 1.tl0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ra F Adjr i.oo l.oo ].oD 7.00 1.0o i.oo 7.00 2.00 i.oo 1.06 1.oD 1.tl0 Final Vol.r 0 0 0 104 0 37 196 1766 0 0 lug 33 ------------I---------------II--------------•1l--___----------II---------------1 Saturation Plow Nodules Bat/Laner 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuacrosnt, 0.97 1.00 0.93 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.92 1.00 0,92 0,92 1.00 0.92 Lamar 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 O.DD 1-tl0 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final 9aC.r 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 1750 5700 0 D 5700 1750 -----------.I---------------II.-.-..-.------.II----.-.....,__-II-_.--_-_-------I Cepactty Analysi^ Nodule. Vol/Satr O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.21 0-71 0.00 0.00 6.21 0.01 C11t Mower attr ware pw• Green rime, 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 45.1 81.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 48.! VolumefCspr tl.06 0.00 O.OD 0.66 0.00 0.23 0.51 0.37 0.00 0.00 0,67 0.01 Delay/Vahi 0-9 D-0 0-0 67.5 0_0 49.9 26.8 2.6 0.0 ~ 0.0 24.5 19.0 Veer AelAdj, 1.00 1.00 S.Otl 1.00 1.00 I. DO 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Vehr 0.0 0.0 D.0 67.5 0.0 49-9 26.8 2.8 D-0 0.0 24.5 19.0 LOS b~ Mow, A A A B A D C A A A C B- RQ12kAVgQ r 0 D 0 5 0 1 10 5 0 0 3 0 0 ••w•w ta•wa/pRpaa papwrfwaraa pfaaaaap•faaw aaaaafp raawp aaa••rp p••pppea Note, Queue zspOrCed is the number of cart per Lana. TraflLa 7.8.0715 (D) 2098 Dowling Aaeoo- Licensed to CITY OF CUFBATINO fixisitng PFf Peak Thu OOt 21, 2007 19+30tb3 Page 11-1 Cupertino TIA Interaeecion Cslevlaci~+s Leval of Service Camputati0n Report 2000 HCI4 Operation9 Method (PVture volume Alterneciva) •+waH •Ha •Kaaa•a a•a R•a•+a1 Mae Naaaaaaa•a NaHa HaH Haaa+•+•+++pr a••wN• •a r• lncersection tl7 3cavene Creak a Bzandlay ' arrasraa•ar•aaaarrr•aae+aaaaaaa..rar•aaaaa•a•aaa{aa waaaaaaaaaaaaaraaa•a aasaaaa• Cycle Iaec)s 110 Critical- vol./Cap. (Ri+ 0.762 Lore Time (sae)= 12 (YaRa4.0 sac) Average Delay Iseo/vah)e 32.4 Optimal Cycle. 7s Law) or service= C- a••a•a•aaaaaaa{laaaraaaarraa aae•ara•aaaa+•aaaa aaaH aaaaaaaaaaAaaa{a1{•aaaaaaa Approaehr Aorth Botwd South Hound Heat Hound weaC eDUnd MOwsiettCe L- T - R L- T -~ A L - T - R L- T- R Control, Permitted Permitted protected Protected Righter include include include include Min. Greene 7 10 10 7 10 16 7 l6 iD 7 SO IO Lanear 0 1 D 0 '1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 9 1 0 Yalwte Module= Brae Vo1r 70 16 40 209 16 111 443 1194 S3 105 1173 107 Gro4+th Adj• 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lnicial Sae. 70 16 40 789 i6 ill 491 1299 33 103 1173 107 Added vol. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o D FasserByvol: o a o 0 o D D D B D o 0 Ittltlal Put+ 70 le 40 289 16 111 443 1394 53 105 1123 307 User Mja 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PIlF Adj. 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.97 O.DI 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.97 f+BF Va16iiRt 76 17 43 314 17 121 492 1407 58 119 1771 llfi Raduat YOle 0 0 77 0 0 81 0 0 23 0 0 10 Reduced vol: 76 17 9 314 ]7 40 483 1907 39 11a 1771 ]ae PC>~ Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLY Adjr 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Yinal VaI.r 76 17 8 314 17 40 487 L407 35 114 1711 106 ------------I-------------•-il----._...-._..-II.---_--.-------ll-------.-------I Se.CUration plow MOdulae fiat/Lane. 1900 1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adju9.tmanL+ 0.99 0.98 0,91 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.9I 0.92 0,99 0.95 Lsaaa= 0.91 0.19 1,00 0.93 0.08 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1,00 3.73 0.29 Final 9st.+ 1465 735 1759 1706 94. 1750 1750 5700 1750 3750 5131 a99 ------------I---------------ll---------------II---------------II-----•---.....-I Capacity Analysis Modules Yol/Bate 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.18 0.30 0.07 0.71 0.45 0.07 O.D7 0.74 0.14 Crit Mowae •a+• aaaa w•ra Gre4m. limes 75.9 35.9 35.9 38.9 38.9 38.9 38.7 57,0 57.0 SB.1 33:1 33.4 Volume/Cape 0.77 0.77 0.07 0.76 0.79 0.10 0.78 0.48 0.04 0.46 0.78 0.79 Delay/Yahe 39.1 ]5.} 37.3 69.8 51.8 33.3 41-4 17.5 13.1 50.5 39.7 38.7 Geer aelAdjr l.oo i.oo l.oo l.DO l.oD 1.60 i.DO l.DD l.oo L.oo 1.06 i.oo AdjDal/Veh+ 35.1 35.1 37.3 53.8 53.8 33,3 4],a 17.9 13,1 50.6 38.7 38.7 SrOB lay Mpvar D+ ba ' C- D- ' D- C- D B B D Da RCMakAVgG+ 3 3 0 13 13 1 17 10 1 4 16 16 aaaaraaaaaaara raawaaaaa•r raa•aea+aaaaaa a•aaa•aaaae+raa+a»aaraa aaaaaaaaaaaeaaaa+ 9kete+ Qurus reportsd is CM number o[ cars per lane. TrarFix 7.8,0715 tc) 1006 Dexllnq Aesoa. LleatlaSd to CITY OT CVP91tTIf40 N_ r W W Yxisitng PM peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 14e30e33 Fags 12-1 Cupertino TIA interaaction Glculations ' Level Of Service Caoputacioa Report 2000 HCM Operations t4ethod ITUture volume Alternative) as+aaaalM aalaa HHarHaHaa•aaaaN aa•Iaaaa N•a •aaaa{aaaaa++•raa! wH Hafaa •+N •e InCenaccion IiB 9tellinq a GxaanleaE Cycle (eec)+ 60 Cri dcal vol./Cap. (ic)r 0.73a to6e Tlme IeeO)= 12 (Y+A.4.0 9e0) AVpYege Delay (6eC/wh): 11.9 Optimal Cycler 60 Level 01 BetVieee Ba a•• •aaaa •aa •• •ra•aa•aaa raa aar•a•a•aia•faaraa•a Approachr aHOrth Bottad a aSOUehaBOtn3d • Bart Bound Waat Bound Movement r L- T - R L - T- P. L- T- R L- T- R ---°-------I--°-----------ll---------------II---------------If---------------I Control: Ferndccad pezmitced Pasadtted Fertnitt:d Righter 3ncluda include Include include Min. Creenr 7 10 iD 7 SO 10 7 10 i0 7 i0 SO Lanes t D 0' 1( 0 0 0 0 11 D D O O i f D D 0 0 1 1 D D Volwmr hbdule+ Base Vol: 16 587 Growth Adjr i.DO 1.00 Initial Bee: le 387 Added eels 0 0 FaeaexByYnls 0 0 Initial Fate 16 587 User Adje I.DO 1.00 p!ff Adjr 0,91 0.92 pFiP Volufies 17 638 P.educt Vol: 0 0 Aadvaad Volr 17 638 PCE Adjr 1,00 1.00 ML7 Adjr 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.r 17 636 12 Z1 868 35 55 it 45 24 21 79 1.aD 1,oD l.aD i.D6 i.aD 1.DO i.oD 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 21 868 35 55 11 25 29 al 29 D o 0 0 o D a o o D D 0 0 ~ 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 13 21 968 35 55 11 25 24 21 74 i.o9 1.oD i. DD Loo 1.00 1.00 I_oa 1.60.1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.91 0,97 0.92 0.42 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 13 27 943 38 60 12 27 26 73 26 1 o a a o 0 12 0 0 20 12 23 943 Sf 80 12 18 ]B 23 8 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 ].00 1.00 13 33 NS 36 60 12 19 26 2J 6 9atvration Flour l4oduier Sat/[,aver 1100 1100 1400 1900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 Adjuetmmt+ 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.97 0,17 O,H7 0,-4 0.97 0.97 0.93 Lanee+ 0.07 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.94 0.09 0.69 0.14 0.17 0.47 0.47 0.11 Final Sat a l6 1673 37 40 3647 67 1204 241 306 670 776 144 -------•----I---------------II----------•----II----------•----II---------------! Capacity Analysis Modular Vol/Sac+ 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.05 0.05 0.05 O.OJ 0.03 0.03 CriC MvvCB: aaaa aaaa Green Timer 90.0 89.0 96.0 56,0 96.0 96.0 10.0 10,0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10,0 Volutse/Caps O.b3 0.53 0.53 0.79 b.79 0.79 0.90 0.40 0.90 0.25 0.25 0.25 nelay/veh+ 6.9 9.6 9.$ 17.1 13.1 37.1 37.9 37.5 37.8 34.4 34.4 34.9 Uear De3Adjr 1.00 3.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Dal/VSh+ 6.5 6.5 6.5 12-1 SI-1 12.1 37_5 37.9 37.4 34.4 34.9 34.9 L09 Dy'MOVee A A A B B' A Da D+ Dr C- C- RCM7kAVgQ+ 6 B 8 19 39 19 3 3 3 7 7 3 aaaa•aar•a •arara}aa•aara•a raa aa•raa}a•a+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}aaaaa•+aa•aaaaaraaaarraa Nat~+ pu4ua reported ie the number of Darr per Iona. TraEiix 7.8.0715 (e) 2009'DOwling AB600. Licensed to CITY OF CU9EATINO Sxiairng YM Peak Thu Oct 11. 7007 14r30r33 Paga 13-I Cupartine TIA In teraection CalcuIatSons Level D! Sarvl ca Culputat ion P.aport 1000 8CM Oparati0ns Method IFLturi Volume Altarnativ4l ••a•aaa a••aaraa«aaaaaraaaaaw awaaw•aa•r•r•ar••warawea•aaa r••«•ar...•aai•aaraH Ha Intaraactioa 1)9 stalling a McClellan aaw«rraaa••a•r••ar•fr••r••••r•aarraraarawaa«larww••a«••rfawa•aararee••a•ar•raae• Cycle (sec)t 75 Critical vol•/eap.,(x)r 0.7x4 Ioe^ Tima (aac)r 17 (T+A=4.0 sec) Avezaga Delay (sec/ve]1)r 37.7 Optimal CyClar 69 Lawl OC 8erviCe: D+ a• •••••a.••a••r«•••a+r+r«raraaa-rw«a•raaa rahaa N•rara•ararrarrrar rarrr Appreaehr Nereh Hound 9ouch Bound ¢ast Sand west Bound MOveme0.tr L- T - R L - T - R L - T - A L- T- R Control. Protected Protected Protected Pretactad RSght6r Include IOCluda SCClade Irccluda MSri. Or6anr 7 10 30 7 10 10 7 10 IO 7 10 30 Lanas+ 1 0 1 1 0 1 D• 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 D 1 voluare Modular DaBa VD1= 126 734 72 330 564 163 174 414 119 133 376 154 Growth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 Initial Bear 176 734 72 330 364 163 274 414 119 133 37e 154 Added Volr 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D o 0 Paa6arsyvol. D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 Initial Futr 126 234 71 330 564 183 174 414 179 333 376 I54 Vsar Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 I.00 3.00 S.OC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adjr 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 PI3P Volumes 114 154 78 35! 613 199 lag 480 140 14S 409 ~~ 167 P.educt Vol: 0 D 50 0 0 15 0 0 39 0 0 131 Reduced Volr 139 184 70 38! 613 184 189 450 101 149 409 36 Pcs Adjr l.o0 1.00 1•oa i.oo l.oa i.oo 1.DD S.Da 1.06 I.oD 1.0o i.oo MLP Aaj: 1.DO l.oo a.oo l.oo•l.DO l.oo l.oo l.oo l.DO i.oD 1.00' 1.00 lSnal vol.r I3! 784 70. 389 613 184 189 460 101 145 409 36 ----__--_-_-I----------•-•--Il---------~__-_'II---------------II-------•-------I 8aturatim Ploy Meduler Bat/Lava. 1f00 1l00 3lOD 1100 1900 1900 1900 1909 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjllatmantr 0.91 0.96 0.95 0.91 0.96 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.90 0.91 1.00 0.l7 Tenser 1.00 1.69 0.15 1.00 1.83 0.47 1.00 0.81 0.16 1.00 1.00 S.OD PSnal Sat.r 1740 J477 773 1750 7646 664 1750 146! 733 1710 3000 1760 Capacity Analyete Hoduler Vo]/6at= 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.17 0.21 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.11 0.02 Crit MOVear •rr+ rrr• ~ wart •arr Qraen Timor 6.6 10.0 10.0 18.3 19.7 19.7 11.6 17.3. 17.3 7.4 73.1 13.1 VolvmaJCepr 070 0.56 0.56 0.84 0.82 0.81 0.70 0.84 0.64 0.64 0.70 0.07 DalayNahr 50.3 14.9. 34.9 44.7 73.6 33 .G 44.0 3[.1 74.1 89.7 19.7 18.6 User DalAdjr i. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.C0 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vahr 80_3 34.9 34.9 44.7 33.6 33.6 44.0 34.2 34.1 59.7 79.7 18.8 iA8 by Mo¢ar D C= C- D C- C- D C- C- 8 C RCM1kAVgQr d 4 4 ll 11 11 6 18 14 6 10 1 wrrraar•rr•lra rata Nrrra aaawalaa•aa•a••••a•ra•rrlaarl•Na••a«a•aaMarlr«a M•Raaa Notae CueUa rspOrtsd 16 the numbor of cars par lads. Trellis 7.6.0710 (c) 7006 Doriing Assoc. Licanaad t0 CITY OP COPCATIMO N A 6xirting + ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 1007 tar 19.I1 Page 1-1 COparC2D0 TIA IDCYISBCtiOR Ca1CUlaLiOnb lcenarla Rapost , 9canazio: Sxietinq't ATI AR Paak Comrond. existing + ATI ~ Project AM Votuman Existing + ATI AM Peak Roux Qeometryr Existing + ATI AM Ia~aee Pear Default T~aot tae Trip Oenarationr None Trip DSBCZiDUCion. Daily Paehar Defauii 8aeha Anutea. Oafauit Aoucu Con{iguzaeione Default Configuration ' Trar [SX 7.9.0715 ICI 70afi Dowling Aaroo. Licenaad to CITY OP' CUP&RTINO N_ r &xiating * ATI !IM Peak Thu Oct 31, 4007 14.1-rli' Pe9a 1-1 Cupartlno TIA Inceraeccion Ca1CUlaciona Trip Diatributlon Aeport Pmreanc Of Tripe Da11y Tb Datea 1 1 1 a S 6 Zone __.__ _~___ _____ _____ _____ _____ i aP.0 30.0 5.0 7.0 3.'0 15.0 Treffix 7.8.0715 Ic) 1006 Dowling AscoO. Liconsad to C2TY OP ~CDPSP.TTPA1 Sxieting + ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 1007 14.19x11 Page 3-1 Cupertino TIA Intersection Cal cula[ione 7Lrning Movement Report None Volume Norehhaund southbound SasCbound weacbound Total Type Left Thrv Right Leff .Thru Right Lafc ThN Right L9ft Thru Right volume Ni~scevana creak t Bubb Rd eaaa 194 11 505 D] 21 50 1! 779 87 507 884 39 3116 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 TOCal 144 1] SOS 93 27 50 14 779 B7 507 664 ]9 7119 Rx scev4uu Ctaek c Nary Ave Hose 37 6 39 70 11 171 711 1018 640 7i7 645 67 3324 Added o 0 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 D 0 D Total 37 6 29 70 31 171 71a 1016 610 117 949 67 3314 1{3 8tevan6 CrNk F as 95 P.aypa ' also 0 .0 0 1067 0 101 0 1174 ISO 206 692 0 3410 Added , a D D D 0 0 o D D o D D D Total 0 D 0 ia87 0' 101 0 1174 180 706 691 0 3410 A4 stevena Creek 4 NB 65 Ramp8 , Hasa 40 LO1 0 13H S 485 6B1 1674 0 0 871 533 4769 Added D D D a o 0 0 o D D 0 0 0 TOCal 40 101 0 12B 5 485 BBl 1574 0 0 821 533 4269 N5 scwen9 Creek a Stalling Ad ' ease 393 987 298 113 354 131 287 477 1!] 571 671 147 148{ Added 0 0 0 0 D' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 arocal 393 557 148 213 351 731 75a 477 198 871 671 143 4451 N6 8tevana Creak 4 6AICH aaae 0 D 0 34 0 103 159 1114 D 0 977 60 1557 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 34 0, 103 159 1114 0 0 877 80 a857' N7 Bteven6 Crsex a arandlay ' Base 1! 14 7 16 9 74 150 754 10 28 1131 106 1306 Added 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 D D 0 0 0 9 Total la 3l 7 36 9 74 190 759 10 ae 1137 109 7306 88 8telling a oraanleaf • Baa^ 14 671 79 9, 605 50 109 ZD 31 14 1B 71 1616 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. TOCal 14 i71 74 ! 604 80 199 10 31 34 16 77 1618 N9 scellin9 6 McClellan ~Hase 713 666 79 113 '89 69 291 151 41 56' 295 ~ 159 as+1 Added D D o D D D D D 0 D D D 0 Total 113 666 75 113 69 69 191 151 41 56 295 159 1341 Traf fix 7.8.0718 (c) 7006 Dowling Assoc. Licaniad CO CITY OP CUP6RTIN0 Existing + ATI AM Peak ?hLL OCL 11, 1007 14r19r11 page a-i Cupertino TIA Incaraaction Caltvlations impa0t Ana3ysis Report Lavol OI Service Intersection Hase Future Change Dal/ V/ Del/ v/ in ' Lb6 Vah C LOS Veh C • N 1 Stevens Creek & Aubb Ad C- 33.0 0.639 C- 33_0 O.b39 + 0.000 DN N 2 9tevaos Creek a I4ery Ave C+ 72.2 0.451 Cr 11.2 0.451 + 0-000 D/V • N 3 Btavena Creek a 8H 85 Rams C 26.6 0.523 C 19.6 0.82) t 0.000 D/V ~~ 4 ateWna Creak L N8 DS AierQ9 C- 31,9 0.9I C- 33.9 0_681 + D•DDD D/V N E etavens Cteek E stalling Rd D 34.4 0.789 D 39.4 0.789 + 0.000 D/V ' ! 8 atevans Creek F 6AICR H 13:7 0.391' H 13.7 0.391 + 0.000 D/V / 7 SC4Yana Creek 4 Hrandley H 16.7 0.404 8 16.7 0.904 + 0.000 D/V ' 1 9 SCe11iDg a Oraanltst 8 13.2 0.616 a 13.2 0.616 + 0.000 D/V 1 9 Stalling 4. NcCiallan D 44.5 0.705 D 44.5 0.705 • O.DOD D/V Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) ao96 bawling A59oc. Licensed co CIIY OF CUPaATINO N ~ ~ / SxiatinQ + ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 1007 14:14,71 page 5-1 Cupsttlno TIA intersection Calculations Level of gervice CO~utation Report 2000 RCM operations Hathod (Future Volume Alternative) Aw rttR+y+a.rar+ataewarfarraaaytfwwrfrrfrarrrwtaaf tfarteraaaear#a•rf aaa••aaagfaa 2atarsectien 41 8tewne Creek & Buhb Rd aaa afaasaaaa+aaaaa•r rfalaarKfwaaaartaaaa efar••f Haara•waraa#Raawaa•aataww+twaa• Cycle laec)c 1z0 Critical vol./Cap. (X)s 0.639 Goes Time (eat)s 12 (Y+R~9.0 sec) Average Delay (sea/vahir 33.0 optimal Cycles 9a Level of service: C- aNltRaaaaaaAaawaaaNaalaaiAaatYAaaANaAAta~eayaaR fawa4fAr1Awtlyf+wrayaf affatttl Approach: NOrch Hound 90uch Bound Saet Bouod ' Nesc Bound Movements L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R - ---.-._-._I_______________II____.__-______-II_____._________II__---_.-.._-___I Control, Sp11c Phaee 6plic phase Protected Protected !lights: Owl ~ Include Inaludn 2aclude rtin, Qreear 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 ]0 Letlesr 0 1 0 0 1 1 O 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 7 0 1 1 0 volume Mvdulea Base VOlr 144 11 508 9J 27 50 14 774 87 407 864 3S OrONth Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bsss 144 it 805 ~ 91 77 50 14 779 B7 507 B64 35 Added VD1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. o D a o PaeeerByVOla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 Initial Futs 141 11 806' 9] 17 50 14 7?9 87 507 964 35 User Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.OD 1_OD i.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 PE1F Adjr 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9Z 0.9Z 0.62 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 PHF Voluner 157 11 549 101 ~24 94 14 647 9S 031 939 38 ReduCt VOlr 0 0 146 0 0 d7 0 0 65 0 0 3 Reduced Volr 187 17 403 101 29 7 15 947 30 851 -3! 35 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 M3rF Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final VOl.a 157 12 403 101 19 ? 15 947 30 551 939 35 ------------f---------------ll---------------I1--•----.....---II---------------i saturation Ploa Module: Bat/Lance 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1109 Adjustment. 0.98 O.DS 0.93 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.9a 0.93 0.97 0.95 Lancer 0.93 O.D7 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 O.D7 Pinal Sat.a 1677 128 3150 1750 1900 1750 1750 3600. 1780 1150 7961 133 -----.....-.I---------------II----------.-...II-..._----------Il-__...---------I Capa0lty Anelyalr Modules Vol /6aCs 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.01 O.Z2 0.02 0.17 0.76 0.78 Grit MOVlbr taws aaa• a+a. aaaa Green Timer 17.6 17.6 40.6 10.9 10.9 10.9 17.6 41.9 "41.9 32.9 61.2 61.7 Volume/C4tpr 0.64 0.69 0.30 0.64 0.17 0.05 0.08 0.64 0.05 0.64 0.57 0.42 Delay/Veisr 59.5 39.5 23.7 70.9 52.6. 50.4 48.4 35.1 16.0 41.9 70.8 70.8 Vwr DelAdja L.aO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1-DO I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh. 89.4 59.5 33.7 70.8 b1.6 50.4 48.4 35.1 26.0 ai.4 20.6 20-6 Lob by Movai 8+ Y4 C B D- D D D+ C D C+ HCM11rAvg()e 7 7 6 5 1 0 1 I3 1 11 17 17 •a afaaafaaaataarAaartaatr•tataRyaaRaraatra#tafatlatalatafrt as attwa Hrwa to attMt )tots. queue reported is cha aumbar OZ care per Sane. Traillx 7_9.0715 (CI 1006 Dowling Ars00. Licensed to C2TY OP CUPIe7lTI190 N W V ExiecinQ a ATI AM Peak Thu Oct ii, 2007 14:19. i1 Page 8-1 CrtperCino TiA Intersection Calculations Leval Of Sezvics Canputacion Report 2000 ACM operaciOne Method IFutuse Volume Altrrnrkive) taaaaaar+aaaaaaaaa aaaAtat+rritAt if wafaawtataara•a+I NaawAi sawaaat+A*aAata•Atataa 2nC9taeetl0n p7 6tever~a Creek ~ Mazy Ava •aaaaa•taaaaaf ataaAawafwa aft at Naawa.aaafaaNaaatwaAaa taaAaaaraaa#aaaa#rwaa#aaaa Cyela (secy. 79 Critical VD1./Cap.(X)s 0.461 LOaa Time (act)s 12 (YtR~4.0 eec} Average Delay (eeC/vah)e 2I.1 optimal Cycles 46 ~ Iaval OZ 3ervicer ~ C+ Ra#rftRaaftaataatataat+wtRaa taatafltlaaw#a•aaaftNa+aa tfat•of late •tart4f taaa••w# Approach: Horth gourd South Hound Baat Bound 9teat Bound Movamane a L- T- A L- T - A L - T- R L- T- R ------------i---------------If---------------If---------------II---------------I Controls Pmteeted Protected Protected Protected Righter Include Include Include Include Mia. Green: 7 30 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lenesa 2 0 0 1 D• 1 0 1 .0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 O 1 volunse Modular Base vole 37 6 79 70 lI 177 714 1016 640 717 845 67 Oroath Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 86E- 37 6 29 70 11 172 211 1016 640 217 845 67 Added VOlr 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 PabeerByVOls •0 0 p 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D D IOitlal Futa 37 6 19 70 lI 177 I14 1019 690 717 895 67 vser Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 173E Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.9] 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.42 0.91 0.91 0:97 0.41 PHF VokrOer 40 7 32 76 .a1 187 233 1104. 696 236 919 73 Redect VOia 0 0 I5 0 0 145 ~ 0 0 548 0 0 57 Reduced Valr 40 7 7 76 32 41 733 1104 149 73B 91a 16 PCH Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MGF Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pinal Yol,a 40 7 7 78 12 47 773 1104 ]48 276 918 le ------------I---------------il---------------ll----•----------II---------------I Saturation Plpw Modeler Bat/Gene. 1900 1910 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetmentr 0.93 0.95 0.94 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.93 Lazleaa 2.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1-OD 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final aac.r 3150 900 900 1750 1900 1750 1750 5100 1750 1750 b700 1750 Capsaity Analyais.Modules Vol/Qats 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.19 0.09 0.13 0.16 0.01 CriC Moves: ••yt •ara area Careen Times 7.0 10.0 10.0 t7•0 10.0 50.0 ZO.B 27.1 27,1 18.9 29.7 19.7 Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.47 D.OS 0.]A 0.49 0.54 0.23 0.54 0.48 0.03 Dal ay/V~hr 37.a 29.8 79.6 41.5 18.7 30.5 Ze.O 70.0 17.5 29.9 20.6 16.9 User pelAdjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vehr 33-Z 7a.d 28.9 41.5 28.7 70.5 26.0 20.0 17.9 7a.9 10.9 la,a LDa b'Y Movei C- C C D C ' C C B- B C Ca HCH7kAvgQs 1 0 0 2 0 1 8 7 3 6 6 0 ataf•tattltttlt•la.ttta of aalaa tfatta•aa to tRaatattttfaafalalaa as+aaAA•aaRaalaaaal HOter queue reported is the number OE care per lane. Trait ix 7.8.071b (e) 2006 povliag Asaoe. Licanaad t0 CITY OF CVPSRTINO fixieting ..ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 1'4+19,11 Page 7-1 CuperCino IIA Iat@r9@CtiOn Ca1CUlaLian9 Laval of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operntiona Method (Future Volume Alternativ@) ••r••ra w•••••rr•ra•aa•r••••aa•••aaa••raa••a•aar•ra awa•a••a aa•aaaa••aa.aa•.•••. Int@r9ec ti td 83 Steven6 Creek . 68 B5 Aampe •••••w•••••••aa•••.a••r••w•au•••a••a•••••ara••ar ae••r•wrr•+•.rraaa•.aa••r Cycle (ex)a Y10 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X}r 0.523 LOCO Time ,IseO)a 9 (YaA•4-0 sac) Average Mley (sac/vah)+ 18.8 Cpclmal Cyelar 38 Level GL 9ervicsr C •+•aa+arr•r•J••••a•ar•••ar•+aa ra+r•a••••rr•aaaaaa•a••aa•a•.•••.Ja sa •a•aar••ra•aa Approschr North pound South pound fisat Bovod nest sound Movement r L- T- R L- T - R L- T - R L- T. - R ----•-------1---------------11---------------I1---°q---------I1---------------I eenerolr Parmictsd Protected P xmictad Protected Righter Include Include Include Include Min. Grsae.r 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 70 10• 7 70 10 LeReer 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 D O 1 0 0 3 1 0 ~1 O 1 0 9 Volume Modular pose Vol: 0 0 0 1067 0 101 0 117+ 160 a06 692 0 Orawth Adjr i.tl0 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 S.DO 1.00 initial 7leer 0 0 0 1097 • D ~ 101 0 1174 1B0 SOB 692 0 Added Val, 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0- 0 PaassrIIyVOlr 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial F1it+ 0 0 0 3047 D .101 0 1174 190 209 6!1 0 Vaar Adj+ 1.00 1.00 3.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 P61P Adjr 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91 0-97 0.92 0-91 0.41 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.9T PHP Volume, 0 0 0 1160 0 130 0 1178 •196 324 752 0 Radutc VO1+ 0 0 D 0 0 82 0 0 132 0 0 0 R@duCed VO1+ 0 0 0 1160 0 a6 0 1176 i4 114 757 0 PCfi A43r 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 S.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-DO 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pinal VO1., 0 0 D 1360 0 16 0 1176 Ll 114 792 D ------'-----I--•------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Sntureti[N1 Flow Modular Sac/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 19D0 2900 1900 1900 19D0 1100 1900 190D Adjuatreentr 0,91 1.00. 0.91 0.57 I.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0,99 0.63 1.00 0.91 Lancer 0,00 0.00 0,00 3.00 0.00 1.00 O.OD 3.00 0.20 2.00 2.00 0.00 Fines Bat. + 0 0 0 4950 0 1750 0 7343 358 3150 3800 0 --~._.._.___i---------------il......_---...--II-•.-.---_-_._--11--_-.-.-.--_...I Cap^city AnalYsie Modular Vol/8ata 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,13 0.00 0-03 0.00 0-16 0.19 0.07 0.20 0.00 Crit Movua wear a•ri •Yer Grlen T11Mr 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.7 0,0 93.7 0.0 41.0 41.0 16.3 57.3 D,0 VO1Ume/Cep+ D.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.52 0.91 0.52 0.41 D.00 Delay/Vahr 0.0 D-0 0_0 24-6 0.0 19.0 0.0 31.5 31:.5 51.6 11.1 0.0 Uaei DelAdjs 1.00 1.D0 1.00 •1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 3,09 1.00 AdjDal/Veh+ 0.0 0.0 0.0 14,9 0.0 19.0 0,0 32.5 32.5 53.9 21.1 0.0 LOB by lover A A A C A 8- A C- '•C- D- C+ HC141kAVgQ+ 0 0 0 11 D 1 0 10 10 9 9 0 wa••r•a••a••a+aaa+a+aaraJwaara•ar•a•arras.a•ar••••aaaa•awaYli•ra•a•raaraa••a•a•• Note, Queue r~partad Sa the aua~bar of ears per lane. TraLtil< 7,9.0718 (oi 7006 Dowling AesoO. Licensed co C3TY OF CUPERTINO N W QD Dcieting + ATI AM Psak Thu Oet 11, 2007 14r19:i1 Page 8-1 • Cupertino TIA Interfaction Calculations Leval OL 8ervire Computation Report 2000 HCM operat3one Method (Future Volume Alternative) ruaaaaaaa•ra••••awr•ara•••••r•••••a••a•arr+aaa as as ua•aa••aa••a•aa•••r•••+•w•a+ IateraeCtiOn tF4 9LaVen6 Czeek B NB 85 Rake •Ma•••u•ar•u•ra•Nrr••a•w1 a1•a••wr•aM h•Hr»•••aaa N~a•H KaJaN arHN••H• Cye is (asc}, 110 Cxitiwl vol./Cap.(Y.)r 0.662 Lose Time (see)r 11 (Y+R=4.0 eecl Average Delay (asc/vah)a 31.9 Optical Cyelar s9 Level OL 5ervicer e- u••ra•uw•.••a•r•aa•r•+a•r•a aaa•a•aaaa••.••rrr•••a••a••arar•a•••a ••.a•••••••• Appmach+ North pound South Sound East sound Nest pound Movement a L- T - R L - T- R L- T- R L- T - R ------------I---------------II---------------ll-----------=-•-II---------------I Contro]r Split Phase Split Phaea ,Dzotaceed Permitted Aiyhte: Include Include lnclvde Lgnore Mio. Greenr 7 20 10 7 10 IO 7 IO 30 7 l0 3D Lanear 0 1 1 0 0' 0 0 St 0 1 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 7 volume Modular • Base Volr 40 101 0 718 5 495 6ai 1674 0 0 613 533 Growth Adj+ l.DD l.o0 1.DO l,oo i.oo 1.6D i.DD S.6D 1.oD l.DO 1.60 l.Do Initial Bear _40 301 0 718 5 4B5 Bel 1579 0 0 622 533 Added Vol+ D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Pes^erayVolr o o b o a o 0 0 0 o D a Ini.tlsl Yut+ 40 101 0 121 5 485 BB1 1979 0 0 121 337 Veer Adje 1.00 1.00' 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 D.00~ PNF Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.17 0.s7 0.92 0;92 0.91 D-92 0.91 0-97 D_00 PHF YO1Vale, 43 110 0 146 S '927 740 1711 0 0 876 0 Aeduct 4b1, 0 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 437 PAduead Vel+ 47 110 0 246 S 159 740 1711 0 0 676 0 PCS Adjr 1.00 1.00 I.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Ad]r 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final vol.r 43 110 0 14B S 159 740 1711 0 0 676 0 _-.._.------1---------------ll---------------Il------.-----.--II--...-.-..__.--I Saturation Plow Modular Bat/Lana+ 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 Adjustmentr 0.94 0.96 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.63 1.00 0.92 D.91 1.00 0.91 Lahesr O.SB 1.42 0.00 0.65 0.01 1.34 9.00 3•DD 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final 8at.r 1049 1650 0 1137 36 1]42 7150 5700 -0 0 5700 1750 ------------I---------------II-__------------II---------------li--------•------1 Capacity Analysis Module, Vol/8etr 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.77 0.21 0,11 0.13 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 Cr1c Moveer ~ as+r aaa• •••• +aaa Green Timor 10.0 10.0 0.0 37.b 37.0 37.4 10.2 60.5 0.0 0.0 70.3 0.0 Volume/Capr 0.50 O.SD D.DO 0.70 0_10 0-35 0.7D 0.59 0.00 D.OD 0.70 0.00 belay/Vahr 56.7 56.2 0.0 41.9 41.9 31.6 36.5 23.0 0.0 0.0 51.2 0.0 Vssr Ds1Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 7,djDel/Vr11: 56.1 9A-7 0.0 A1,9 91.9 37.6 36.9 a7.D 0-0 O.a 51.2 0.0 LDS by Mevi+ p+ fit A D D C- Da C+ A A - D- HL741kAvygr 3 3 0 14 14 a 15 19 0 0 9 0 •~•a••a•aaaa•awrawr.••wr•ra••••rw•a •a•+•r+a•r••aaa.•a•••ra••aa+aer•a•ar••a•aarr• Noce, Queue reported is'tha number o! taro per lane- TraLlSx 7.6.0715 (c) 2006 powl my Assoc, Licensed co CLTY OF CUP6RTINO 8xibting + ATI AM .Faak Thu Oct S1, 7007 24,19:11 Page 9.1 Cupertino TLR Interaectlon Calculations . Laval 0! Sarvica Compuucion Aeporc 7000 ACM Oparatione Method IFUture volume Alternative! a•.'a1•wiwaasa tsar.rrrr•aai•#r••rri•arr•••{•arrairarrrrarr•i•a iaaiaia•:aaar4a4ara InteralctiOn 05 9tNNr Creek 6 BCllling Rd •}rr•rar•+H«r+r•rri•rr••r}a••rA4raa•Nr•iliar Hirera•a }aN •a•rei is•aaalaa«ralra• Cycle (eaey, 90 Crf tied) Vol./Cap.(%y, 6.759 Loss Time feat), 12 (Y+A.a.D aecy Average Delay laic/vehlz 39,4 Optimal CyClee 67 Level O! SarviCS, D a{a ••ra •a N f•rr•}ra}•airia•{•rlaarla rl•H•l setter..{•rr Approach, aaNOrthrBaunda• r•BOUth Hound Bast Bou,zd Werc Bovnd Movemmtz L - T- A L- 2- A L- T- A L- 7- A ------.._..-L---------------II-.-.--_--------II......---..-.--II--------------I Control: Protected PrOCeOCed Pzocecced Protected ttighCCZ Include include include Include Min, Graao,, 7 10 10 7 i0 10 7. l0 30 7 10 SO Lanes, 1 0 7 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 7 0] 0 1 ------------I••-------------fi----°---------II-----_---------II---------------1 Volume Module: Base Volz 393 657 14B 713 754 331 157 477 193 671 122 163 OrONth Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bea, 393 557 211 113 734 271 357 477 1!3 STS 822 143 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 D pasearlyVal, D 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 O D xniCial put: 393 557 790 113 354 731 752 477 193 571 821 143 user Adja 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD PFI! Adj, 0,92 0,92 0.91 D.9a 0.97 0.93 0.97 0,92 0.9a 0.97 0.12 0.92 PNP volume: 417 605 770 237 315 751 774 511 110 621 193 155 Redact Vol:• 0 0 a04 • 0• o• 206 0 O 81 0 O 172 Reduced Voi, 427 809 i6 233 713 41 274 111 ~I29 671 197 33 'PCS Adjr 1.00 l.DD S.oo 1.DO l.DO l.oo l.oD l.oo l.oD 1.DO 1,op l.Do MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.(10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.. 4a7 'COi i6 237 79L 4i 774 611 129 Cal 193 77 ___.._-_---• ---------------11---------------II-----.--___----II-------------.-~ IaLUratiOn P ON MOdUler gat/Cans, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190U 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustmenci 0,li 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.l2 0.12 0.99 D, pB 0.1] 1,00 0.93 Liner, 1.00 7.06 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.38 0,67 7.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1750 3100 1750 1750 3500 1750 1750 4414 1114 3150 5700 1730 --.-.-------f---------------il---------------II-------=-------fl---------------I capacity Aoalyrir Modular Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.16 O~.D4 0.13 0.10 0.03 0-LI 0.12 0.32 0.90 0.16 (1.07 Crlt Mmzes, *rar rata +ar• ••rr Green Times 21.9 77.4 21.4 11.1 22,0 17.D 31.5 13.7 13.7 23.4 11.3 '11.5 Voluara/Capr 0,71 O.i4 O,1S 0.44 0.71 0.19 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.76 0:75 0.01 Da18y/Vehz 31.7 33.9 27.1 41.1 47.1 36.5 4T.7 47.9 47.E 17.3 31.3 '79.4 Veer aelAdja 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vlhr 71.7 33.6 77.1 41.1 47.1 36.5 47.7 42.9' 4a.9 37-3 31.3 79.4 LOS by Mwar D+ C- C ' D D ba D D ~ D " W D+ }tal7hAVgQz 11 1 2 7 7 1 30 r~ 1 11 10 1 • r•i.••+ka••.a#as•ar+r•aaaaar•awaa raraaaAasalrara••awarrrlaa •tarrar•ral •rrrr rr Noce, puaw reported Si the nuarber o£ cart per lane- ' TraSrl.7z 7.1.0775 {ey 2006 DoNl ing Ae1ae, Licmaed co CITY OF CVP8ATIND _N r W f0 szciating + AT1 A14 Peak Thu OCt 11, 2067 14r19z11 page 10.1 Cupertino T1A intereecclon Calculations Laval O! Service Computation Raporc 2000 ACM Operations Method (Future Volurrs: Alternative) •ai«r+a•ra Ara ir~•iru a•rrai+a}«riiwa.•rr+rir+wrerr.#r.u aHaaH wrest#•aAr:w err IliCer9aCL100 01 S[even9 Creek $ SALCA •iia r•rrar4rarrli}a•a}aa••••r•af radarrrN}rarraaraar4a{•144{a4N {•{•••Iarra #}•r• Cycle leac)r 110 Cri cite) Vol./Cap.IX)z 0.791 L019 Time Iseelr 9 fY+A.4.0 sae) Average Delay (sec/vah): 13.7 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level q£ 9arvicar B ++arafrri+r H Af•••aa aairrrala•aaaiafala•H a{aria•Niraafr•{ia•aaariar•a«•alaa•f• Approachr North Hound 6outh Bound Fast Sound Wear Hound Movementr L- T - R L - T - A L- T- R L- T- R' Control, P@rmitiad prntected PLOtlCLed PeIfilLCld Rights: Include include Include Seclude Min. Green: 7 10 30 7 SO 10 7 10 30 7 30 10 Lane9, 0 D 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 "1 1 .0 3 O 0 0 0 7 0 1 ------------I------•---•----II---•-----------il--- =----------II---------------I Volume Modulo: Hate Voir 0 0 a 34 0 103 299 1124 0 0 977 60 OroNth Adjr 1.00 1,00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 I.00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1_00 1.00 Lnltial Beaz 0" 0 0 34 0 103 159 1124 6 0 977 60 Added VOL 0 0 0 0 'D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Palaer8yvolz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Snieial Fate 0' 0 0 34 'D 103 159 1174 0 0 977 50 Veer Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1-DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ff9F,Adj, 0,92 0.92 0.97 0,92 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.92 FLiF VolUmer 0 0 0 37 0 117 282 1121 0 0 1061 65 AeduOt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0~ 91 0 0 0 0 0 t1 Reduced Volz 0 0 O 37 0 17 212 1212 0 0 1067 74 PeB Adjr 1.00 1.0o i,DO 1,00 1.aD l.DO 1.oD 1.00 1.OO l.DO l.DD l.DD MLF Adjz 1.(10 1.(10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FSnaI Vol., 0 0 D 3T 0 21, 711 1221 0 0 1082 74 9atutacion P ow Module: Bat/Line. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 irDD 1900 1900 1900 Adjurt0lentz 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.82 1.00 0.97 Lansa, D.DD 0.00 0,00 1.00 1.p0 1.00 1.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.OD Final Sat-: D 0 0 1750 1900 1750 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 Capacity Aaalysi^ Models: '~ VO1/Satr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.16 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.19 0-01 Cdc. MOV/ai +rar rrwr •Ir• Green Tirtw, 0.9 0.0 0.0 30,0 0.0 10.0 43.2 91.0 0.0 O,0 46.9 4/,a VoluOe/Cap. D,oo o.oo O.DO 0.23 0.00 0,13 0.42 0,26 D.OD tl.00~0.47 O.D7 D811y/Vehe O-0 0.0 0.0 49_8 0.0 47.7 76.9 2.1 0:0 0.0 21.4 17.3 User iMlAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.OU 1.00 AdjDl1/Vehr 0.0 O.D 0.0 40.9 0.0 47.7 16.8 7.7 D.0 O.0 11.4 17.3 IA9 by Mover A A A 'D A D '- C A A A C+ 8' RCM2kAVgq, 0 O. 0 1 0 1 6 3 0 0 1 0 r if Aarf•fararRAi+rl rrrrarrri•ii•i•rriiarr•r•1aAliiai••aarA•rafaa af•aa#•alraaarrr Note. puaUS reported iB the numb:r o£ care per lane. TcaflSX 7.0.0719 fey 70 D6 Dowling Assoc. LSceneed to CTTY OP CIJPaPTINO 6tisting + AT] AM Flak Thu Oct 11, 2007 19.19+11 Page 11-1 Cupertino TIA Incereection Caleulacions Leval 01 Service Computation Report aooo HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternaeivey •r «f!a «frt}rwaA rfafr}fff+t of afwf•a«fA rf•Kif rl of arrf l«f «f of of faf>f a+of if afr# Intmrcaccion 87 9tswns Creek G 8randley of ffliffr«a rf M•ffAwraa ifflaaafafarf as NfNAAafrraf rf lf111f •IN r«ir as ar Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap. IX)+ 0.404 Lola TSma IseC1: 11 (YrA~4.0 sae) Average Delay (cec/wh)r 16.7 Op01me1 Cycle, 39 Lwal O! BervSces B faf afflrffffaafa«ara•woof}feats}rufaAaawfraafaafrffaafff arlAfarrafrlrrafafaHf Approach, North Bound south Hound seat Hound ~waat 8aund Movement, L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R Control, Permitted Permitted Protected Protected ASghts+ TnCluda ineluda ]acluda Seclude Min. Oceans 7 10 30 7 10 30 7 10 10 7 30 10 Lanais 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ] 0 7 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Modular Eeae Vol+ 14 19 1 36 - 9 19 150 154 20 28 1137 108 Growth Adjr 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1•DD Initial leas 11 - 24 2 36 9 34 150 754 10 28 1137 108 Added Vol: 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pa9sereyvals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 O 0 0 0 I!!iti81 Futr 16 14 1 36 9 74 150 754 20 18 1137 108 veer Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Adis 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.D] 0.91 0.!] 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.91 P8F Valuer, 15 16 2 39 10 16 163 '910 21 30 1736 117 Adduct Vol+ 0 0 2 0 0 17 a o 9 0 0~ 10 Aedueed Vol: ]g 16 0 3f 30 9 181 a10 17 30 1138 107 Pte Aai. 1.0o s.oo I.DD l.oa 1.ao i.oa i.oo 1-oa 1-00 1.00 1.00 1_oa MLZ' Adi3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.s 15 16 0 1f 10 ! 187 920 17 70 1238 107 8attsrati0a P10w Module: Bet/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 1900 Adiuatmintr 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.99 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.97 0.92 0.99 0.15 Lanesr 0.37 0.63 1.00 0.80 0.70 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1-00 2.75 0.15 Final Bat.. 881 1177 1750 1440 380 1750 1760 5700 1750 1759 5157 448 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/8atr 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.14 Crit Mower •aaa aaf• faf• Green Timer 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 E4.8 81.0 81.0 17.0 83.4 53.4 Volume/Cep, 0.75 0-15 0.00 0.10 0.30 0.08 0.41 O.a9 0.01 0.07 0.42 0.47 DelsyNahr 50.7 50.2 45.5 51.3 51.3 48.4 79-8 11.9 L1.0 33-1 i3-4 1]-9 veer DalAdir S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vehr 50.2 50_1 43.5 51.3,51.3 46.t 39.8 17.9 11.0 31.1 13.4 11.4 IAS by Move: D' D D D- D- D D a e+ C- B 8CM2kAVgOs 1 a 0 2 a 0 5 5 0 1 6 9 arA11«lara Nra of arr«frff ra afarrr ra}ffirarff«f of rf r#afftiffff•ff Rf r+fr•rafaaf r}1• Kota: Quaw reported la Chi number O! Care p4+r~lana. Traitix 7.5.0715 (cl 2006 DOw11ng Aeaac. Licmaid [D CITY OF NPERTTNO N O 8xlating + ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 1007 14:19:11 Page 12-1 CuperClnO TIA InteretCLion Caleulatiane Levl1 D1 Service COnputetion RepOYL 7000 HCM Cyeretione Method (Future volume Alternative) aarrafaf to wafff}+a}Aaflf+f aff«f if iffaf afffaa}fflifflf refit aA•r}fr1#f of if lfff Yfff InterBSCtion 88 Scelling a Greealesi f•f}f rfarfffrfar«f rrf as ref aaf aarralaaraaf liar}aarfrf•if 1«Iflafaaf aaaaraf aaf of r+l Cycle 18eCls 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (]C)r 0.618 ivea Time (secle 11 (Y+R.a:O aec) Average pelay {sae/whls 11.1 Opcinal Cycles 49 iaval OL 8arvice. B aaf Afffaf arfff rrara#frr«f afwwrw«rf laf«I«r«waf»rfra+laarfaaafa•ref affafflr}wf r:} Approach: NOith 80Und South Bound Eaat 8ollnd we6c BOUnd Movements L- T - R L - T - R L -~ T -' A L- T - R Control. Permitted Fermilced Permitted Pasmitked Rlghtes Include include Include 2nelude Min. Organ, 7 SO SO 7 10 10 7 30 1D 7 30 10 Lanes s 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 D 11 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Volucn4 Module+ Base Vols 14 672 14 9 805 50 109 20 32 34 15 32 Growth Adjs 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~I.DO 1.00 Initial lees 14 672 24 9 605 50 109 20 37 34 15 32 P~dad Vals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 O PuaerByVOls D 0 0 0 0 0 0 b D 0 0 0 Initial Fate 14 673 1l 9 509 50 109 10 32 34 15 33 User Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Oa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adjs 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9a 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.92 PHF Volumes 15 770 18 10 859 54 118 11 3S 37 I6 75 Reduct vo1: 0 D 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 16 Reduced Vol. 15 730 23 SO 659 51 119 12 17 37 16 9 PCH Adjs l.oa l.DD ].o0 1.aD 1.00 l.DD 1-00 1-0o i.oo 1_DO i.oD l.oo MLF Pdjs 1.00'1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 15 730 ZS 1D 659 51 218 11 17 ]7 15 9 -_-_________I_______________II__.-_.--.-._.-.~`.----_...-..---II--_.-.--_.-._._~ eecuration Flow Module, Sat/Lute, 1900 1900 1100 1900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adiustmentr 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 O.l2 0.97 0.92 0.87 0.92 Lenael 0.01 0.95 0.03 0.01 0.92 0.07 0.71 0.13 0.16 0.60 0_75 0.11 Final SaE.r 3S 1558 57 24 1601 175 1291 218 181 1042 460 148 Capacity Agalyd^ Modules VOl/gate 0.94 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.42 O.ll 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 Crit MOVear aflf frrf green Timer 64.1 64.1 64.7 64.1 64.1 64.1 13.9 13.9 23.! I3-9 11.9 13.9 Volume/Cap. D.G1 0.57 0.67 O.SB D.SA 0.58 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.23 0.23 Delay/Vebs 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.3 8-3 8.3 45.5 45-8 95.8 35.3 15.3 35.3 User DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00~ AdiDSl/V~hr 9.0 9.0 !.D s.l 8.3 9.1 45.0 lS.B 48.8 15.3 35.1 15.3 L08 by Moves A A A A A A D D D D. Da D ACM1kAvgQr 12 12 12 it 11 11 6 5 5 2 2 1 faalfa/frlf}rffar#aaf/f rafrf+a Nrrraral««lrrrra•r«frrafrlr of «1f r11a1rf aaralflfkf Notes Queue reported is the number a! cazs per Sene. Trertix 7.9.0715 (c) 3006 DowlSng Assoc. Llcerwad Go CITY OF CUPEATIND 3trletinQ + ATI AH 9eak. Thu Oct 11, 2007 14,19+11 Page 13-1 _____________________________________________________________r.______. _______ Cupertino TLA Intareact ion Gleuletione Level OE service ComputaCion AeporL 2000 HCM OpereCiOne MaChOd Irr ULUrt VO1i1R1a A1LtrnaClVa) aaAa•AAfr•r Nfa•faaAA•+aaarAarlaaaa a•aaaaaAaaaaaraafafaaa•afaff•aafar a••af as Afa• interaeccion A9 Stalling A F1oClallea +1laaayaaaaaaaaa•N4f•aaAa••raafaaw•aa ae•+e eta r•RAar•rRAar•ARrrlrriaff •f }f Rf•Nf Cycle faae)r 120 Critical Val./Cap. (Jtle 0.705 LOe s'Time (sec)+ 12 (Y•Rr4.0 aeel Average Dal ay (sec/vah): 44.i Optimal Cyolen 8Z Leval o! 9errics, D .•ARaa+aa•AARI SaMH1a•+aHN NHH•aaaara•ar.a+rri a•••.aaaraaala•+aaa•aa Maria+ Approach, Horth Hound South Baund Haet Bound Heat Hand MovemenC, L- T- R L- T- R L- T - R L- T- R -----------•I---------------I1-------------•-tl------------•--II---------------I Control, Protected PxOtrated Protaaced P1roCecced Righter InCluda Include Include Include Min, Dreenr 7 1D 10 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 10 10 Leilee, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 L ------------I---------------II---------------Il-....---....---II-....._....----I Volume Modular Base Valr 213 688 75 113 89 69 292 261 41 56 299 199 Growth Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial B9es 213 886 75 113 89 89 793 291 41 58 298 169 Added vol, D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Yasaer5yvolr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial PUG, 213 660 75 113 BB 69 297 251 41 56 295 159 Veer Adj, 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10@ Adj, 0-92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.42 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 O.S1 PHF VOlteaa, 232 740 62 133 97 76 31T 2T3 45 61 311 173 Rlduet Vol, ~0 0 36 0 0 23 0 0 11 0 D 144 Redwood Vole 232 746 96 123 97 97 317 273 34 61 311 29 YCC Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Y.00 A4.F Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final VOl.a 13] 748 46 123 97 67 317 273 34 61 321 29 Saturation Flow Module, Sat/Lane+ 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetmantr• 0.92 0.98 0.99 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.9b 0.9] 1.00 0.92 Lanes+ 1.00 1.88 0.12 3.00 1.78 0,77 1.00 0.99 0.11 1.00 1.D0 1.Op Final Set., 1780 3488 213 1750 2408 1293 17sD 1803 197 17b0 1900 175D ----...__---I---------------II--------___._..II-•-------------II-----......----I Cepe0lty Analysis Maduler Vol/Sat, 0.13 0.]1 0.71 b.07 0.04 0.04 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.17 0.07 Grit MDVeSe aawa afa+ aAa. ra •• Organ Time. 29.7 36.5 36.5 11.9 18-7 i8-7 30-9 44.4 44.4 15.2 28-7 26.7 Volume/Cap, 0.53 0.71 0.71 D.71 0.28 0.18 0.71 0.46 D.46~ 0.27 0.71 0.07 Delay/vehs U .6 40.7 40.1 T3.6 45.6 45.8 49.4 31.0 31.0 50.5 50.8 35.6 User DelAdj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Dal/Vahr 43.A 40.7 40-7 73.6 45.6 a6-8 49.4 31-0 31.0 90-5 SO_8 38.8 LOS by Nwo+ D n D H D D n c' c' a n DA BCM2JNvgQr 8 14 14 8 3 7 13 9 9 2 13 1 AAA-#fAAArAAAA Araaaa•afrk+•N aaraaArRH Hlaaf a+l•Iaara a+aaaaa•aa+aafaaeafa+sa•}f Rota, Queue reported ie thr number of cars par lane. Traffix 7.6.0715 (cl 2006 Dowling AeaoO. Licensed to CITY OF CUPSRTiRO N 1 Existing + ATI PM Peak ~ Thu Oet 11, 2007 i4e31~39 Pag! 1-i Cupertino TIA intereeeti0n Calculations ccenarlo 1leport scenaClo. Existing + ATI PN PeaY, Commaode Exiatinp + ATI + PY03 set RM Volumes 6xi sting + ATI PM Paak Hour Clometry. Exi atirig + ATI PM ' impa[t Paa. Dlfaulc Impact Pee Trip Generation. Nome Trip Distribution, Daily PlCha. DsfeU1L Pa CIW Aoutee. Default Routes Configuzatimr Default Configuration Trallix 7.6.0715 (e) 7006 Dowling Aeaee. Licensed to CITY OF GVPERTIND N A N Existing + ATI PM Pack Thu Oct 11, 7oD7 14+31.39 Page 2-1 Lvpartina TIA Lnteraectiori Calculations Trip Dietrlbutian Eeporc PerclTlt Of Trips Daily To osue 1 7 3 ~ S 6 Zone ---° ^--~- °--. ..^^. .---- -°-- 1 40.0' 30.0 5.0 7.0 3.0 15.0 Tra[fix 7,5.0715 (c) 7006 yowling Assoc. LSOQneed t0 CITY OP CtIPSRTINO Exittl.++g + ATI I44 Feak Thu Det 11, 2007 14,3Ir39 Dgge 3-1 Cupertino TIA Incaraaction Calculetiana Turning t~avement Aeposc , Noaa Volume Northbound 6outhbound SastbOUnd F(e9t370Dlid Total Type Le Et Thnt P.ighc Left Thru Right Left Thru Right La£t Thru Right Volume pi 9cevlae Creek & Bubb Rd lava 93 19 477 64 19 S4 94 868 139 309 772 49 3082 Added 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totai 93 19 477 fi4 19 14 24 869 119 309 772 49 3087 #2 Stewnt Croak i Nary Ave Bags 945 7) 48 157 38 134 368 1718 5B6 305 1168 128 4896 Addeo 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total ]45 77 48 157 39 129 368 1716 886 705 1168 173 9896 #3 6Levarit Croak i SB 95 Range Data 0 0 0. 1705 8 751 0 1036 17b 444 739• O 4334 Added 0 o O o 0 0 O a o 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1205 6 751 0 1036 173 444 739 D 4354 pi Bta+ena Creak 4 NB 86 Raga Baea 54 2A] 0 259 1 530 491 1909 0 0 934 949 8404 Added 0 0 0 0 O D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Total b4 7B3 0 25B 1 530 491 1909 0 0 924 94B 5409 p5 8cewne Creek a Stalling Ad Base 331 994 414 783 947 773 288 923 ]18 876 1787 ]3] 8985 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOtaI 331 396 414 383 547 273 768 923 218 678 1282 257 5965 #8 Btevona Croak 6 SAICR ~~ • Ha68 0 0 0 -6 0 187 337 1893 0 0 1415 60 4D88 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T6ta1 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 3993 0 0 ldi5 60 4098 p7 Bts+ana Creek i Brandley Bua 70 16 4D ]B9 16 117 443 1580 53 105 3507 107 4338 Added o D D D o v a o 0 0 0 0 0 Total TO 16 40 784 18 117 443 1560 •83 105 1507 107 4378 pB stalling 6 araenlea£ Eeaa 16 897 17 21 968 35 55 11 75 24 71 74 1869 Added 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 16 637 I] 71 968 35 55 11 25 24 71 74 1869 #9 Stalling 4 HC•C7.ellan Bate 128 369 72 370 478 183 I74 418 179 133 380 154 3D96 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 178 369 72 330 636 1B3 174 41B 179 133 3B0 154 3096 TralEix 7.8.0715 iel 200fi Dowling Aasae. Licanaad to CITY OP CVBCRI'IND N A W 8xisting + ATI PH Doak Thu OCL 11, 2007 14e33,39 Page 4-1 Cupertino TIA Intersection Caleulaclona i047act Aaaly8i8 P,eporC Level 0£~6erviae Incareection Baae e~cure Change Del/ V/ Dal/ V/ iri LOS Veh C LOS veb C p 1 Staveila Creak i Subb Ad C 27.4 0.694 C 27.4 0.654 + 0.000 D/v A 7 atevana Creak 6 Hart' Ave C- 39.4 0.716 C- 74.9 0.714 .0.000 D/V p 3 9tavan4 Creek 4 SA 85 Renps C- 34.9 0.850 C- 39.9 0.950 + D.000 D/V p 4 SCeveae Creak R Bi 4S Range D+ 77.4 0.796 D+ 37.4 0.796 + 0.000 D/Y # 5 6tevena Creek a Btel:ling Rd 8+ 56.4 0.902 &+ 56.4 0.9D7 + 0.000 D/Y p 6 8cevens Creak a BAICB ~ B 14.9 0.544 8 1a.9 v.544 + O.ODO D/Y p 7 BCeveaa croak G Drandlay C- 3].1 0.a42 C- 33.1 O.B92 + 0.000 D/v # B Stalling it OraenleaE B 14.T O.BDS 8 14.7 0.805 + 0.000 D/V • 9 Btel ling i HeClallan D 45.6 0.818 D 45.6 0.818 + 0.000 D/V TrafE i.~ 7.9.0715 (el 2006 Dowling 3ueoC. Licensed co CITx OP CVP8P.'~INO existing + ATI PM Peak Thu Oct S3, 1007 14r31s39 Page E-1 Csiperrine TIR Intereeetioa Calculations Level 02 Service Cortputation Aepoct 7000 HCM Operatigna Method {future Volume Alteirativa) aft•efitta•a•taaaH tw•waaaa to aR•affaaa a••4aaaf#ffaa#!++##+###+#++•a of N#!#aff### Yntareection 81 etevens Creak a Bubb RQ afaHafawaa aaaawHaawf+•##•fA#aaaaw•aaraaaaaaraaawaaaaafaaaaawaRH ##waf •1#•aw CyeL• (sac)s ~ 110 Cr3tiG1 Vol_/Cap.(xlr 0.654 Lose Tlma (ae0]+ 11 (YwR.4.0 aeC) Average De18y (sec/V!h)s x7.4 Optimal Cycler 55 Leval O! servi Clr C #Aaf•aaH•##aaflal#f as Ha oaf Hf wa Naaafaa•Aa•a#aN+}I• •Hf ff af+la f•+#+#Rwwwf waft Approaehs North Bound South Bound 1(eat Bound Ne9c BOUnd MpVameDLe L- T - R L- T - P. L - T- A L- T- A __----------I---------------II._.------------II---------------II---------------I Control. Split Dhae• split Phaaa PzOCected Protected R19hta+ WI Include Include include Min. Greens 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 SO 10 Lanes r 0 1 D 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 -__--____.__I ...............II_-_________-__-II_____.-.-_.._..II__..-.___-_____I Volume Modular Baase Ycl: 83 19 477 69 19 14 19 BSB 179 509 771 84 Growth Adjs 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Ob 1.00 1.00 Inl.t ial Heas 83 19 477 64 19 14 Z4 868 139 809 771 04 Ached vol. 0 0 0 o D D o 0 0 0 0 0 paFaerllyVol+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Initial F11t: 93 19 477 84 19 14 Is 868 13.9 509 771 B4 Vaar Adjr 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adjs ~ 0.92 0.91 0.91 0. a3 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.41 0.91 PH7' Volume: 101 11 518 7D 11 15 26 943 151 553 839 91 Rednec Volr 0 0 a17 0 0 13 0 0 99 0 D B Aeduead Volr 101 11 301 70 11 1 16 943 S1 651 839 83 Fes Adj,. l.DO 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 1,00 1.00 i.oo i.ao 1.DO S.oo S.ao MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 l.oo l.oD l.oo i.oo i.oo 1.00 1.00 1.DD 1,00 l.DD Final Vol.s 101 71 301 7D 11 1 76 943 52 553 839 B3 _--------.--I---------------if---------------II---._--------_-II-----.-__-.__--i 9aturati0n Flow Module. Bat/Lane= 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjuOtssemte 0.9! 0.95 0.83 0.91 1.00 091 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.83' 0.98 0.95 Lanes. 0.83 0.17 7.00 1.00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2_00 1.81 0.19 Final Bate 1498 708. 3150 1750 1900 1750 1750 7800 1750 3150 3386 334 Capacity Analysis Modules vpl/Sate 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.94 O.D1 0-00 0.01 0.1E 0.03 0.18 tl.19 0.23 CYSt MOVeae area +w+• earn Green Times 12.1 1d•1 43.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.4 44.4 44.9 31.4 60.5 60.8 Volume/Cap. 0.61 0.61 0.74 0.44 0.11 0.01 0.11 0.81 0.07 0.81 0.98 0.45 Delay/Veh: 60.1 60.1 21.7 55.8 47.4 45.7 41.1 17.8 10.3 37.1 15.8 15.8 Dear De1Adj+ S.oo 1.00 l.o0 1.DO 1.00 l.oD l.DD 1.00 I.DO i.oo i.DO i.oa Adj Dal/Vehs 60.1 60.1 11.7 55.8 47.4 dF.7 47.1 17.9 30.3 37.1 18.8 15.6 303 by Hovey B s C+ sr D b D C C+ D+ A' RC?12kAvg0+ 3 9 4 3 1 0 1 17 1 10 30 10 awafi f#1RwawH nave Hawa•aaRitaallaf fa HAAaf#aaffaf+la4#+}#f •++f tH oaf wHa•awtH an NOter Weue reported is the numbax oL care per Sane. Treiiix 7.8.0715 le) 1001 DoN1ing Reno. Liccnaed c0 CITY OF CVPBRTINO fJ FxisCLng + ATI PM Paak Thu Oct il, 1007 14e31s40 Page 6-1 Cupertino TiA Intarsaoeion Calculations Lovel OL Service Consputetion leport 1000 RCM Operation0 Method IFUtsssa volume Aiternative) a off•#++aafaaf R+f+fwfRR1H f1a H aaaaaaaAaaaaH It tf of Hwf+Ite+ffftRfwaw aalaf ••tff• In terseCCiOn S1 Stevana Creek d Mary Ava #fff if Afalaaffwaa4tlrafl+lean tf aftlaf#+#tfa+ilatfaala newer#afalaala#ff atffaftlt tt cycle teao)+ loo Critical val./Cap_IX)= 0.716 Loan Time (eeo)e 11 (YrR~4.0 eeel Average Oelay (aeC/veh]r 34.4 Optimal Cycler 67 Laval D! Sarviear C- f#fa•ia of wa HaffaaN Hafffawf a•ff#ffawww•awf•Afff#t#f lfa a+aw+HaaaaaaaHaawa#t#f Approachr~ North Sassnd South Hound Saet found Nast Hound Movement. L- T - R L- T - A L- T - R L- T - R -----_---.--I---------------II...-;----------II---____--_-----II-----.._.-.-_--I Cen[rola PiOteCtld Protected PrOLGC red PcOteCted Righcfs include Iricluda Snclvde Include Min. Cizaen, 7 SO 10 7 10 19 7 10 30 7 10 10 Laner+ 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 O i __._--._--_-I_______________II_______________II_-______-_._.._II___---._--_____I Volume. Madulai Sage Vols 745 73 4a I52 30 174 360 1716 586 304 1168 123 Growth Adjr 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Baes 748 77 48 152 30 114 360 1716 486 309 1188 173 Added Vole 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 Fase.r9yvolr o 0 0 0 o D o 0 o a o 0 Initial Tit+ 245 23 98 157 38 lid 368 1716 406 305 1168 273 Vaar Adjr L.oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 PH1r Adj+ 0.97 0.97 0_92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.81 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.l1 0.97 PHF Volumes 266 25 51 165 41 135 400 1865 637 331 1770 134 Aaduct vol+ 0 0 43 0 0 106 0 0 370 0 0 BB Reduced Vol+ 266 75 8 168 41 27 400 1865 1fi7 337 1770 46 FC8 Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj. l.oo i.DO l.DO 1.oa l.ao l.oo l.o0 1.on 1_oD 1.00 1-00 1.00 Final Voi.s 366 15 9 165 41 27 400 1865 1fi7 337 1170 46 SeturaCian F10w Modula+ Sat/Loner 1900 1900 1900 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment. 0.83 0.88 0.98 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 LaTiaas 1.OD 0.73 0-77 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 Firiel Sat.s 3150 1317 483 1780 1100 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 .__-_.-.----f---------------ll---------------II-------_----_--II-.----.------.-I Capacity An:lyeis Modules Vol/Sate 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.73 0.33 0.15 0.19 0.22 0.03 Crit Hovaaa •tft w•a# •w.a~ afaf preen Timor 10.1 10.0 10.0 12.1 11.9 11.9 IJ.4 41.8 4L.B 74.1 31.5 37.5 Volume/Cep. D.0! 0.19 0.19 0.78 0.18 0.13 0.68 0.78 0,37 D.7B 0.68 0.06 Delay/Veh: 66.9 43.6 93~i 97.4 91.4 40.8 I5.1 27.9 11-4 99.0 31.3 13.6 User DalAdjs 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Adj Del/Veh+ 66.4 43.6 43.6 67.4 41.9 40.6 38.1 17.9 71.4 49.0 31.3 13.6 L08 by Move, B D D' B D D D+ C ~ Ca D C C 14Ct41kAvgQa 7 1 1 7 3 i 12 18 6 17 I1 1 4ffaaf a#fta•Iaf of Aaaa affaaffaa Af ffwaaatlfff t+atRtf Rf #awf+++t if •af aataaffalw#af Rf Note+ Queue reported i^ the nu8ber D! cars per lane. Trailix 7.a.0715 (ei 1006 Dowling AeaOC. Licensed to CITY OF CVF¢RTINO EXSac1nQ + ATI PM Paak Thu Occ 11. 2007 14 a31+40 Page 7-1 Cupertino TIA Intaracccion Calcula done Leval 0! Service Computation Aepnzc 2000 ACM Oparaciona Method IFUtUra Yolume Altarnacivel Naas a aaaaaaaawra aNN•N aaa •aaa••+a rrw ewer to rtwaaaRr HaMalNNNNawwartaNaaa Inuraection 07 Stevens Creek 6 98 95 Ramps iaaaaRafRaRttarae NRa e•Lra+aaft•+N+Ra+awt•w+aaf•+a#faa+fl+a••ra•w•aa+aaat•+•awa Cycle faeC)r 110 critical Vol,/Cap.IX)r 0.8x0 Loss Tima (earl: 17 (Y+R•4.0 sec) Averega Delray (eat/vah)a 34,9 Optimal tycles 94 Leval Oi Service r. c- •awtwaawa •afa aafa• aaaN wawlaf Nat#tN art N+raltaarawN MfaawaafN of of aaw•a•atwaf Approach, Nozth Hound South eovad E4rat SOUnd Meat Bound Movement: L- T- P.• L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R Controlr Partaittod Drateeted Permitted Protected Rightas 2nclude IAClude IOOluda Include Min. 3reena 7 10 10 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 10 10 Laneea 0 0 0 6 0 2 1 a D 1 a o 3 1 6 2 o a D a ------------I--•--•--....---II°-------------II----•--•-------il------------...I volume Module: Yaea VOlr 0 O 0 1208 6 791 0 1078 I73 444 739 0 Orowth lldjs 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bres 0 0 0 1205 6 751 D 10]6 173 494 739 0 Added VOIa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 9aeaereyvol+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D 0 ]nitial FUta 0 0 0 1305 6 751 0 1036 173 444 739 0 User Adir 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAF Adya 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.93 0.92 0.97 0.93 PAP Vblumtr 0 0 0 1310 7 018 ~0 1136 188 483 803 0 Reduct VOlr 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 187 0 0 0 P.adUCad VOlr 0 0 0 1310 7 788 0 1128 36 483 803 0 PCR Adis 1.00 1.00 I. DO 1.00 1.OD 1.00 S.DO L. DO 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 MLF Adjr 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.r 0 0 0 1310 7 7B6 0 1176 36 493 803 0 SecuYation Flow Modular gat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetmeutr 0.97 1.00 0.93 0.67 0.9b 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.95 O.B3 1.00 0.92 Lancer 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.a7 0.17 7.00 2.60 0.00 Final 9at.1 0 0 0 4978 29 1750 0 7287 773 ]160 3800 0 Capacity Analysis MOdtdes Val/9atr 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.17 0.77 0.49 O.DO 0.18 0.18 0,18 0,71 0,00 Crit Movaea, rear +a rf •raa f3z'e8n Timer 0.0 0.0 0.0 5A.1 88.1 50.1 O.0 20.0 20.0 19.8 39.9 0.0 Volume/Cap. 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.SO 0.30 D.aS 0.00 O.B9 0.83 0.83 0.58 0.00 Delay/Vaha 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,4 17.4 31.9 0,0 50.3 50.3 58.4 10.2 D.0 UsaI aelAdj, 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/veha 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 17.4 31.9 0.0 50.3 50.3 aB.4 30.2 0.0 L08 by Moves A A A 8 B C '~ A D D R+ C A NCM7kAVgOs 0 0 0 10 1 27 0 17 17 12 li . 0 ••aw+ilaaraatf•faa•alwa+ala/wa al aaa+wai Ha•afarwaaaaaRaaaar••a+aalata Y+rra Hrwla NOtas Queue raporead is khe number o! CsYa par lane. TrarEix 7.6.0713 (c- 7066 Dowling Aeeoe. Lieeneed to CITY OF CUPSRTIAO N A Sxieting + ATI PM Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 14r3Ir40 Pags 8-1 Cupertino ZIA Intersection Caltvlations Leval DE Service Computation Aaporc 7000 ACM Operations Hethod (Future Volume Alcernacive) N a•• aaRa uaartaatrN NNtta•fraararwraaNrN rwtaNeaaaa•aaaaaNaa. aawaaaaa+a• Intersection w4 Sceveaa Creak 6 NB 65 Rampe f 1a •a as N•}aaaa•N aaaN aa•N a#aaa•Laa•~•ataa•aaRataaaaarlaawwaAlakaa+laaw+aaaaaA Cycle laec)s 110 Cri tleal vol./Cap-(X?+ 0.796 Loan Time (set)a 12 fY+Re4.D Ae0! Average Delay (sec/veh)r 37.4 Optimal Cycle: 7B Level OI Services D+ eat of raaat affattatta rf#aafaaa aarrwaaaRrawlw Nla ra}aaaRttf •aeati•+wiRNaa+aaaaaat ApprOAChs North Bound SOUth Hound Reel Bound Meet 80110d Movement: L- T- R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R CCntr0lr Split Pbaaa split Fhaea Protected Proteoted AighGee Seclude IoClude InC1Ude Ignore Min. Orcena 7 10 10 7 IO LO 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lenee a 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 i t 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ------------I•--------------II---------------I1------•-°-----II--------------•I Volume Modules Base Yols 54 263 0 258 1 530 491 1909 0 0 934 999 Orowth AdJa S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Saar 54 7B3 0 258 1 530 491 1909 0 0 934 949 Added"Nola 0 D D 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 D D FaaeerRyVOla o 0 D 0 0 o a o D o o D Initial Futr S4 263 0 26a 1 530 491 1909 0 0 034 949 Ucar Adjr I~00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 L.00 1.00 O.QO PRF AQja 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0_97.0.92 0.99 0.92 8.92 O.DD PAF Vblumaa 59 308 0 280 1 576 534 2075 0 0 1015 0 Aaduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 279 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Volr 59 300 0 200 1 797 534 2075 0 0 1016 0 PCB A4ja 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD O.OD -ILF F1dja 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final v01.+ 59 306 0 780 1 797 634 2075 0 0 1018 0 ------.--.--1---------------II---------------II.....-......-..II.....-.--------I Saturation Fiow 49odu1er bat/Lama 1900 1900 1900 3900 L900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj usCmentr D.9S 0.98 0.92 0.97 0.92 0_97 0.83 1.00 0.82 O.f7 1.00 0.97 Lanee+ 0.33 1.67 0.00 0.65 0.01 1-34 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Flaal 9at.s 597 3107 D 1141 4 2354 3150 5700 0 0 6700 175tl Capadlty Ana yaia Module: Val/9atr 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.75 0,75 •0.13 0,17 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 CLit MOY4Ia+ •art data +raa aali 4zeen Times 17.7 13.7 0.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 24.5 50.3 O.D D.a as-e 0.0 Voluare/Caps D. BO O.BO 0.00 0,80 0.80 0.41 0.76 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 Delay/vahr 60.1 60.1 D.0 97.6 43.6 70.9 97.5 28.1 0.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 User DelAd~a 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 AdjDal/Yaha 60.1 60.1 0.0 d3.6 43.6 30.9 47.5 78.1 O.D 0.0 43.3 0.0 L08 ty Mave r 8 R A D D C D C >1 A D A ACM2kAVgpa 6 B 0 16 16 6 13 23 0 0 17 0' aaaraataai•faetataara Ntaaaaaarrafratw•rfaartata•a •alatttr•aaaa•aa•+afawaaaaaaa• Nater Queue reported is the number o! care per lane. TraEEix 7.8.0715 (c) 209f Dowling Asaac. Licanaed to CITY OF COPARTINO fi%lating a ATS PN Peak Thu OcC 13, 7007 IJ,31,40 Paga 9-1 •Cupertino TiA mteraection Calculations _ Level O! Sarviee Computation Report 2000 HCM Operacione Method IFUture Wluma Alternative) falitaraaartfrf lira attatf wrist aaaataawarafawlil aaa at•raarl!•/wwa'•i•f4Haaaiarff• Tn[ar9a0tion •5 8tevene Creek c stalling Ad awraafrarlt/ta lra«1ra«atf )rat•fr•fart•f•alrf aaaata aaaa•aaaN•aaaaaaaaaraaarraaaw Cycle (seal, 120 Critical vol./Cap. 1X1, 0.802 Lees Tuna (see)r 17 IY+R.4.0 Sec) Average Delay (seclush), 56.4 OptiP,9] Cyole, 121 Level OI BerVica, 8+ aaaarlt•awarara•ra trait wrawlraaf•aarrarlraa of aarafaaaa«Iaaaaf!•raN aiaaawlrr«raa Approsch+ North Bound South Bound Bast Bound 14esc Botcd HOVemeTlt, L- T- R L- T- A L- T - R L- T- R ------------ i--------------- I I--------------- I I--------------- I I--------------- I Control, Protested Protec tad Protected Protected Rights, Include Include include inClttde Min. Green, 7 10 10 7 10 30 7 10 10. 7 20 10 Levee, l 0 a 0 1 l D a o 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II-----•-------•-II---------------I Volume Module= Sass Yol, 731 398 414 383 547 773 288 923 218 .6TB 128] Z57 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 x.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 2nitl al Sae, 331 396 914 3A3 547 ]73 188 923 218 879 1262 253 Added VOlr D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pa6eer9yvol: 0 0 0 0 o tl ~a D o a D a Inltla] Putt 331 398 414 783 847 273 768 827 231 878 1287 252 User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t41F Adj, 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 PAF' YblaeNt 360 430 990 416 895 297 791 1003 737 737 1797 275 P.educt Yo1r 0 0 337 0 0 237 0 0 77 0 0 179 ROduced Vol. 380 430 113 418 595 BO 291 1003 204 737 1]93 95 PCB Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.. 380 430 117 -aiA 899 60 291 1003 70a 737 1392 9S ------------ ------•------II-----•---------11---------------II----------°---I Saturation P ow Module, gat/Lens. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1100 1100 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 AQj116tmanC, 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0,92 0.92 0.99 0.99 0.83 1.00 0,92 LsnaB: 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 2.47 0.53 2.00 3.00 1.06 Final Sat., 1750 3600 1750 1750 3800 1750 1760 4653 946 3150 5700 1750 Capacity ysie Module. Vol/Cart 0.21 0.11 0.08 0.74 0.18 D. 07 0_17 0.27 tl.]7 0.23 0.24 0.05 Crit Mouses •aaa agar as rr tpa Orson Tit9sr 27.4 15.5 15.5 31.6 20.8 20.A 24.2 28.7 28.7 ]1.1 38.8 ]$.6 VOIume/Cape 0.90 0.87 0.50 0.87 0.90 0.20 O.A2 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.8T 0.18 Dalay/Veh. 71.1 70.4 56.2 61-3 66.4 43.9 85-1 64.7 54.3 56.0 49:0 37.7 User DalAdjr 1.09 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDeI/Vah+ 71.1 70.4 56.2 81.3 68.4 i3.9 BS.1 $4.3 51.3 58.0 44-D 37.2 I.09 by 3krvai E & fi+ Z: E ' D 8 D- D- fi+ 'D BCM2lcnvgQ: 17 11 6 19 14 Z 33 la 10 19 3a 3 1HrHf as u\ralartaa\ fa•yaff•wr! N •N Nraata.aara.a•aaraa [area Naaf Mrlf aN««ria Nora, puetu reported id the mnnber a! cars per lava. TratfiX 7.8.0719 (c) ]008 Darling Assoc, Licensed to CLTY oP CUPfiRTINO N A W C+tl sting + ATi PM Peak Thu occ il, 2007 14,31,90 Page 19-1 Cupertino TIA Intereaction Caicula [ions Level OL 9ervice Computation Report 2000 RCM Opesatione Method (Buttes Volume Alternative) R}ttlat\araaf lfllrral4aartaaaiirttaffaaar\af of«tH tataffalatt«rr•awraa}+f afrral• InteraeCtioa 88 Stevens Croak 4 BAICH ' •1+•1•f#•+«•e1rfH•aa«atea}-##t•af raaarrl\tataafa\lf aataaaa ralfaaila}aaila\ara Cycle (see), 110 ~ Critical vet-/Cay.(X1, 0.544 boss Time (see)r 9 (Y.Ar4.0 aec) Average Delay (seclush), 19.9 optimal cycler 37 [,eve) of Service, a aaalal/Iaflar•rwlraaleftaaia•a•a•a!•!t•alrr•ra•r••aa+lawa+f}atalal•aatYaar«aalra Approachr North eouad South 8otmd >;est Sound West Sound Mwen,ant r L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T A ----•-------I---•-----------II---------------11-----•---------II---------------1 Coacsol, Permitted Protected Protected Permitted P3ghts+ Include include iaClude Include Min. Green: 1 10 10 7 1D 30 7 10 10 7 10 10 lanes, o a o o D, 1 0 1 0 1 i D 3 D D 0 9 3 0 1 ------------I---------------il---------------I1---------------II---------------I volume Module, Base VO1= 0 D 0 96 D 187 337 1993 0 0 1a18 BO Gmt.ch Adi, l.ao 1.09 l,oo l.oo l.oo i.oD l.oo l.oo l.DO l.DO l.oo l.oo Initial Beer 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 1993 O D 1415 60 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paseereyvolr 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IIIiCLal FUCr 0 0 0 96 0 167 337 1993 0 0 141b 80 User Adj, i.DO i.oa i.o6 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 i.oo l.ao i.oo 1.00 1.00 P10i' Adjt 0.91 0.97 0.97 9.H2 O-9Z 0.92 0.97 0-91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.97 PRF Volumes 0 0 D 104 0 303 366 7168 0 0 3536 a5 Raduct Yol: 0 0 D 0 0 16A 0 0 0 0 0 t0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 104 0 35 •366 2164 D 0 1578 IS PCE Add, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj. 1.ao 1.oD 1.oD 1.09 i.DD i.oo l.o0 1.90 l.oo l.o0 1.DO i.oo AYna1 Volt 0 0 0 104 0 35 366 2166 0 0 1538 26 ..----------I---------------11---------------11---_-----------II---------------I Saturation Flow Modeler Cat/Lane, 1906 1900 1900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuattaent, 0.93 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.OD 0.92 0.12 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lines, 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 3.00 Filial SaC.r 0 0 0 1780 1900 1750 1700 8700 0 o s70o 1780 -- ---------I---------------II---------------il---------------II---------------I Capacity Amlyeis Modals= Val/9aL, 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.06 9.00 0.02 0.21 0.3A ' 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.01 Cric MOVee= rrrr area agar Green Time, 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 D.0 11.2 39.2 87.8 0.0 O.tl 50.a 50.6 Volume/Cap, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.20 0.59 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.03 Delay/Vahr 0.0 0.0 0_0 BO_6 0.0 47.A~ 77.6 3.3 0.0 0.0 22.9 16.4 veer DBIAdj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/vah, 0.0 D.0 0.0 60.6 0.0 47.A 32.8 3.3 0.0 0-0 22.9 16.4 L06 b'Y MOVe, A A ' A E A D C- A' A A C+ 8 RCM21tAVgQs 0 0 0 5 0 3 11 7 0 0 13 0 }raaaaatlararalaN agar/ataaaalrllalt•Nlalaalar\a1r11r1aaaalia•arrr•}1ralrfa}11r Note, puew reported Ls the number of care per )aaa. TraLf lx 7.A.0713 Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. L3ceDeed Co CITY OF CUPfiRTINO ExlaCing . ATI PM Peak Thu oct 11, 2007 14r31r40 Page lI-1 Cupertino TIA Int9reection Calculations Laval Of 6arvice Cortputation Report 2000 RCM Operations Mschod (Future Voluaa Alternative) +.arraraa•asa•rarrrrwa•}rrr-•trace+arrrr}+rar••r.rr«raw•araarar •eaa«atraarrrrr• Inte~9aC GiOn {C7 Stevens Creek & BYandley w•••1ra•+a aa4aaal.r•rra4a••«aaa•aar•a«•a«arw•}«ra•••as •rra•Ira Nw•rrafa•faara rwrl Cycle (Dee)r ~ 110 Critical vol./Cap.(%1r 0.963 Lose Tima (seelr 12 IYaRr4.0 sect Average Delry lase/veh)r 33.1 Optimal Cycler 9a Level Of Services C- r•• rfa rata+a a••rY4+a+a•rarrrrr•rM r«r}r}•rrra«rr•r•ra•wa•fa•alra•a••«a}«+r• Approach. Horch Hound South Hound East BOUrid wear BounO Mwementr L- T- A L 7- A L- T- A L- T- A ----__---_--I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Righter Fneivde Include Include ~ include Mtn. Greene 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lana sr 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 volume Modals. Ltea Valr 76 16 90 1B9 16 111 443 1880 83 109 1507 207 Growth Ad3r 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1•.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Babe 70 16 40 289 16 112 443 1580 53 105 15Q7 107 Rdded volt 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passer8yvol: 0 D 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 D 0 0 I7tiClal Ftlte 70 16 40 389 16 112 449 1590 53 108 1807 107 veer Adje 1.06 i,ao S.otl l.oD l.Dtl l.o0 1.otl 1.06 1.60 l.oo l.oD i.tlD FAF Ad3r 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.42 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 PRF Vol~n9ar 74 i7 43 314 17 132 487 1717 58 114 18]e lI6 Redact vol. o 0 7s 6 6 n 6 0 7 0 6 z4 Aaduced vol+ 76 17 18 314 17 <1 4B3 1717 Si 114 1638 93 PCH Adje 1.00 1.00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 DB.1^ Adjr 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 l.bb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 sinal vol.r 76 17 18 314 17 41 4B2 1717 51 Y14 1679 93 Beturation Flow Modular Sat/Lanes 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 L900 Ada uBRMnte 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 Ganes, 0.81 0.19 1.00 0.95 D.OS 1.00 L.DO 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.83 0.17 7irial Bit.r 1465 335 178D 1706 94 1750 I750 8700 1750 1750 5301 399 ------------I---------------II----------.....II---------------II----=----------I Capacity Aaalysls Modular Vol/Bat, 0.05 0.08 0,01 0.38 0.18 0.02 0.28 D.30 0.07 0.07 0,31 0.31 Grit Heveax •err a••a a•ra Oraen TSmee 33.8 23.8 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.4 33.1 61.3 61.3 23.3 39.4 39.4 Volvme/Capr 0-24 0-74 0.05 D.86 0.86 D.13 0.86 0.54 0.05 0.54 0.86 0.88 Delry/Vehs 37.4 37.4 14.6 63.4 83.4 3B .1 51,7 1i.1 11.3 55.1 78.0 3B.b ucer D.lAdjr l.ao l.DO 1.00 1-0o i.oo i-oo l.oo l:oo .l.oD 1.90 l.otl l.oD AdjDel/vehr 37.4 37.4 34.6 63.4 63.4 35.4 51.2 16.1 11.3 55.1 38.0 38.0 LOS ~ MOVar D+ Da C- B ~ B D+ D- 8 Ba ~ E+ D+ HLT131eAVgQe 3 3 1 14 14 1 19 13 1 S 33 11 ia•a•a«•rwia•aw«•ra~a rlarlaar•a•a~•••rr•r•••ar••ra•aa rarra•aa H 4ar•a •a•Lf rw•lrfr Noeer Queue reported it the ttumber of care par laae_ Tralfi.~ 7.8 0715 (cy 7006 Dowi ing Atavc. Lioeneed t0 CITY OF CUPHRTFNO N A V 30tiating . ArF eM Feak Triu Dcc 12, 2007 14:31r4D Paga 17-i Cupertinr3 TiA Incersectioo Calculations Laval of service CCmputation RBport 1000 HCN Operations Hechod lPUture volume A1CerneClva) irarla}}rffa•fw«r«•racer•erarraaa•aaf#akra•arrararf•arf ••wwrwr••w+rrafawa•aaara• Incereactioa A8 Stalling 6 Oreanleaf aararaarr•••ar•ra•••ra••••••••.ar•a••raaaraar••rr•«r•rwrrr rr«ra••«••ar ra•a•••r« Cyole leecl= 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(Y.)r 0.905 Fn99 TSma {aecl: 12 {Y rRr4-D sac) Average Delay (sec/wh)r 14.7 Optimal Cyelee 71 Level Of eervieee 8 e•r•rr•••«•«••«•••awr•ra••a•raa•aa••aarr••r.•.•r••r••r•••r•a•ra•aaa r•ar•rarua• Approaohe Notch Hound South Hound Bast Bound Wert Bound Mavemmtr L- T- A L- T- R L- T- P. L - T - R ------------1---------------II----------.....II---------------11---------------I Controlr Permitted Permitted Permitted Psrmlctad Righter Include Include Iaeiude Seclude Min. Breanr 7 10 IO 7 So 10 7 10 10 T - 10 IO Lanes r D D 11 0 0 0 O 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 21 ,0 0 ---------_--I---------------II---------------Il--------.-.-_--II----_--.-.•----I Volume Modular Base vole 18 657 11 21 968 35 55 11 25 a4 21 74 Growth Adje 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 laitial Heee 16 657 12 21 968 35 55 11 3S 34 21 24 Added vol. 0 0 0 0 o D D o 0 0 0 0 PaeaerByVOle 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 tl Lriltial Fat, 16 687 12 21 969 35 SS 11 35 24 21 14 Dear Aajr l.DO 1.00 l.o0 1.oa 1.otl l.o0 1.00 l.oD l.otl l.oo l.o0 1.oa P}G' Adjr 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 D.93 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 P}TF Wlumae 17 714 13 23 1051 3B 60 12 37 26 23 26 Redact VO1. 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 12 D 0 30 Reduced vol. 17 71a 13 73 1D52 36 60 12• 18 26 23 6 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjr 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.tl0 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.09 I.00 Final Yol.r 17 714 17 2l 1082 36 60 12 15 36 33 6 ------------I---------------Ii---------------ll---------------II----_._--------! Batvracion Flow HodUle= • Sat/Lance 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 2900 Ad3uetment:• 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 -0.92 0.97 0.9] 0.91 0.91 0.92 Lancer 0.01 0.96 0,02 0.01 O.SS 0.03 6.69 D.34 0.17 -0.47 0.42 0•.11 Final Sat.a 41 3661 39 36 1657 57 1204 741 306 830 736 194 •-----------I----•----------II---------------1I---------------Ih-__.__-__.-----I Capacity Analyaii Modular VoI/Bate 0.42 0.41 0.42 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.07 0-03 tl.D3 Grit Mavear .r«• Green Timer 38.0 56.0 59.0 59.0 B8'0 99.0 10.0 10.0 10.D 10.0 10.0 10.0 Volume/Cape 0.59 O.H 0.44 0.99 0.88 0.88 0.40 0.40 0.40 O.ZB 0.79 0.18 Delay/vehr 7.2 7.2 7.2 16.9 16.9 16.9 ]7.9 ]7.5 37.5 34.4 34.4 34.4 User DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 '1.oa 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD 1.00 AdjDal/Vehr 7.3 7.2 7.2 16.9 I6.9 16.9 77.3 37.3 37.5 34,4 34.4 34.4 LOB by MOVer A 'A A 8 •B B Da' D+ D} C- C- RCM2kAvgQr 10 10 30 26 36 16 3 3 3 2 2 2 •rr•+••aa aaaafa N«raa+araa a••w«+«ar•wr rra•Hrar•rrrrar•wa•af}saa wwarfwaraar•aaw Voter Queue reported is the number o[ cue pez lane. Traf fix 7.e.0715 (cl 2006 Dorrl ing A9BOC. LiCaaaed Co CITY OF NPERTINO Rxis~ing ± ATT PM Peek Thu oct 11, 1007 14x31.40 PBga 13-1 Cupertino TIA Interaactta0 Glculatione Leval Of Seance CmQUtacion Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (FUCUSa Volume Alternative) •!••f••rwfara•r•ar•rrarraaa}f aafafaaaar as era}w•raaw4a4rf•waw•a awrr4•a•aa4ear• intersection 99 Stalling a McClellan rrrl•arrrr•r}r•raaa4N•a•wa••a•aff•f aaw••affa•f4a4f •rrrrr••a•rrrrH rra:!•}r•raaw Cycle Iaaclx 100 Csi tloal Vol./Cap. (X)r O.B16 Loss TiBr (faC1r 11 IXaR~4.D see) Average Delay (sae/veh)r 98.6 Optimal Cycler 91 iwval DL sarvlcer D «ra•ra+ra4aafararaa•aa rarraaa.ar•:•araaa.f araafararirr••r.ar••aaaa•aa a•a wfaar• Approach. North Bound south Bound East Bound hest Brnmd MOVOfIMncr L- T- R L - S- R 4 - 7: - R L-. T - A Conerolr Frot00ced protected Protected protected 0.lghtet include Include SDCluda include Min. vre4elr 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 l0 10 Lapeer 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Modular Base Voli 118 369 72 330 616 313 OsWth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 Inl tial BBSx 138 369 71 330 62e IBS Added Yolr 0 D 0 0 0 0 Paeser9yVOir 0 D o o D 0 1711 tiel Fut. 12B 369 7B 330 616 183 Veer Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 pY1+ Adjr 0.97 0.91 0,91 0.91 0.92 0.91 37ff volume. 139 401 7B 359 680 189 Radon[ Voir 0 0 80 0 0 10 Reduced Volx 139 401 16 359 680 1B9 PC6 Adjr 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjr 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.x 139 401 9B 35! 680 169 174 43B 1.00 1.00 174 418 0 0 oD 174 418 1.00 1.D0 0-97 0-92 189 434 0 0 leD 454 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 189 959 12! 133 J60 184 1.D0 1.tl0 1.00 1.00 LI9 I33 3B0 154 0 0 0 0 0 o D D 119 133 380 154 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0_97 140 149 413 197 16 0 0 137 114 145 413 I5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 134 145 413 36 Saturation ploy Modular SaC/Lane. 1900 180D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjueCmOntr 0.91 0.88 O.9S 0.82 0.98 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.92 Censer 1.00 l.ee 0.14 1.00 1.55 0.48 1.00 0-BO 0.10 1.00 1.00 1_p0 Final 5at.r 1750 3456 244 1780 9898 004 17SD 1430 362 1780 1900 1780 Capacity Analysis Module, vol/9atr D.DB D.17 0.17 o.aD D.a4 6.74 0.11 0.97 Crit Mouser ••• as ra r}aw Greea Timer 9.9 14.2 14.] 75.1 19.9 78-3 16.2 31.6 VO1 u4ro/Ceps 0.80 0.67 o.ea 0.67 0.60 0.60 0.61 0.82 Delay/Yehr 75.1 84.9 54.9 50.6 36.9 36.9 51.3 37.6 Uaar DalAdja 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 I.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Dal /Veha 75.1 8i. 9' 34.9 80.6 38.9 36.9 51.2 37.8 LDB by HdVar E- D- D- D D+ Da D- 3iCTf2kAvgpx 7 9 9 14 18 15 7 19 rrw rra+rr}}••}•a•aarra•rff •war»f•aa•aw 4*rr•r.a•..arr•••. Note, (R74rua reported is the number of ears par lane. a.3] D.De D.a1 0,03 r•r• 38.6 10.1 37.6 37-6 0.81 0.67 0.67 0-D6 37.6 76.7 34.7 73.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 37.8 76.7 34.7 23.4 Da Da B- 19 7 11 1 r•r•r44••«..awrr. ra• Tralfix 78.0718 (e) 1006 Dowling Assoc. Cleansed Co CITY OF CUPBP.TIND N A CQ G~tilting + ATI + Pzojeet An7Thu Dct 11, 200'7 14r20r26 Pdge 1-1 CUpertin0 TIA IntezgaCCipn CalCUlatiOn! scenario P.eport BCanari0. Eclating + ATI + Project AM Peek Command= lacllt tag . ATI + Project AH volumae Sttlating + ATI + Projaet AM Pack Novk OaOmatYyr Existing + ATI + Pzoj AH ImDaCt Feer DelaUlt Impact Fea Trip Ganaratiom Project AM Trip Distribution= Daily Pachar DeflvlC PBCIte Routes= Delault Paucas Coaliguzatien. Delault t7ontigucation Tra!!ix 7,a.0715 (e( 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CVPSRTINO IV A c0 Existing + ATL + Pzoj set AMThu Oct 11, ]007 14.36.]6 Piga 2-1 Cupercine TSA Intersection Calculat[ana Trip Generation AlpOYt . Fozeeast far Drojaet AM Eone Rate Pete Tzips trips Total ~ 0! $ 9ubxona Amount llniCa Sn OUe Sn Our Trips Total 1 1.00 Project 114.OD 51.06 iia !a 16B 100.0 1 1.00 0.00 O.Op 0 0 D 0.0 ZCna 1 Subtotal ............................. 11a Sa 166 100.D TOTAL .....................r ....._...................... 114 54 168 100.0 Tza!!Lx 7.6.O1i5 Ic) 8006 Dowling Aecoc. LiceOCed Eo C1TY OF CVPbRT1N0 Cxisting + ATI + Hroj seC AMThu Oot I1, ]007 14,10x16 Paga 3-1 CupertSao TIA intersection Cal culecione Trip Dlstribucioa Report Paresnt 0! Trips Daily To Oates 1 I 3 a 8 6 Iona ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- 1 ao.D ao.D a.D 7.D l.D 15.0 Traflix 7.8.0715 (ci 300b Dowliag Assoc- Licensed to CITY OF CUPERTI9K1 N CT O exlacing + ATI + Pro3 ect AMThu Occ 11. 2007 19a20:a6 Paga 4-i CuDarcino TLA Iacarasetion Caleulatiene Turning Movemaac Report Project AM ' volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound xescbound Total Type L4Lt Thzv Right Ls[t 2hru F.Sghc Left Thtu Right Left ThN Right Volume #1 Stevens Creek i Bubb Rd Ha6! 144 11 505 93 27 50 14 779 B7 507 ;64 35 3116 Added D 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 9 Total 144 11 505 93 27 50 19 765 67 507 ;67 DS 3IIS #] Btavens Creek c Mary Ave 3iaae 77 6 29 70 it ]72 214 1016 640 217 645 67 3324 Added a o 0 14 0 20 B4 0 0 0 11 14 14H Total 37 6 29 64 11 192 300 1016 690 217 849 B1 3472 A7 Stavans Creek c BH Ba Ramps Haee 0 O 0 1087 D 101 D 117! 160 206 692 0 3420 Added 0 0 0 46 D 0 D 6 O 16 3 0 71 Total 0 0 0 1117 D 101 0 1180 180 221 695 D 3491 #4 Btawns Creak a NB 08 Ramps ease 4D 101 0 ' 22A 5 465 681 2574 0 0 ;22 933 4269 Added 0 0 39 D 0 O 0 51 '0 0 19 21 126 Tbtsl~ 40 101 34 228 - 485 691 3823 0 0 691 586 4395 #5 Scevene Creek a Stalling Ad Haee 393 957 248 713 354 731 252 477 193 571 ;73 143 4454 Added 3 0 0 0 tl 6 4 8 2 0 17 0 42 Total 396 557 248 213 354 239 296 465 195 571 639 143 4496 ~6 BEavena Crack i BAKE sees 0 0 0 14 0 103 259 1124 0 0 877 60 2557 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 8 0 0 17 0 7- Total 0 0 0 34 0 103 759 1137 D 0 494 f0 25e2~ #7 Stevens Creek E arendley Baa• 14 74 I. 36 9 24 130 784 20 28 1137 108 2306 Added 0 0 0 0 0 a o e 0 a 17 0 Zs Total 14 24 2 36 9 24 190 762 20 28 1154 106 2331 #B Stellinq 6 Greanlsal 86a6 14 672 24 9 605 a0 109 2D 32 34 15 32 1616 Aaaaa a 4 D o 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Total 14 676 24 9 613 80 109 20 32 34 15 32 1618 #9 Stellinq G McClellan eataa 213 666 75 113 69' 69 262 251 41 96 299 189 1341 Added 0 3 0 0 2 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total I13 691 7- 117 91 69 293 251 41 56 299 159 2346 Treffix 7.8.0715 (c) ]006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CVPEFSINO 5aisting + ATI + Project AMThu Occ 13. 2007 14,20: 27 pegs 5-1 Cupertino TIA Intersection Celculatiatr Impact Analysis Report Laval Of Service Intersection Baaa Future Change Del/ VJ D!1/ V/ in IA79 Veh C L09 Vrh C A 3 9CeVlne Creak F Hobo Ad C- 33.0 D. 539 C- 33.0 0.640 + 0.002 D/Y A 7 Stavena Crook t Fiery Ava C+ 23.2 0.451 C 23.7 0.488 + 1,473 D/V R 3 9tavenr Creak i S8 IS Rartpa C 25,6 0.523 C 19.1 0.511 + O,g73 D/V k a Bcavena Creek S M8 85 Rallp6 C- 37.9 0.682 C-• 34.5 0.699 + 0.519 D/V R 5 etavw Creek a etelling Rd D 39.4 p.759 D 39.6 0.764 + 0,268 D/V . 0 6 9tevena Creek 4 BAICA 8 17.7 0.391 B 13.7 0-395 -0.020 D/V {( 7 9tavana Crsek 6 8zandley B 16.7 0.404 B 16.6 O.a08 -0-063 n/V M Bet elling & Greenleaf H 13.2 0.619 B 13-2 0-521 + O.O7B D/V 8 9 9ca111ng 4 McClellan D 44.5 0.709 D 44.i 0,706 + 0.015 D/V Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 7006 Dowling A98oC- LSoeDead to CITY OF CUPBRTI~10 N t 5xiecLng + ATI • Yzoject AMThu Oct 11, 2097 14:20+27 Page 6-1 Cupartlne ?SA intereaction Celculationr Lsval Of Service Computation Aeporc 2000 BCM Operations Method (future Volume Alternative) aaaaara aattitlaatf it•a•waw+fAf+aaaf+•lalwff•aa•ttataH ataaAatafaa~f +tlttttaaaa afa interreccion )t1 Stevens Creek & Hubb Rd • wfawf+aa++wff+f wftA•A+rt+f+ftfai+••f aftaw tfw+ffaw tf++a+twwlt+fttfffRrtawaf l+• Cycle {sec): 119 Critical Vol./Cap. Ilil+ •0.840 Le9e Time (eat)s 12 (T+R~4.0 reC) Avaraga Delay (see /+nh)s 37.0 ' Optineil. Cyclns 54 Laval Of Snrvfoea C- itaa•t•wta wt t•if wises of wf ff wtAee•fwaftttatffw+alafif Af w!•tt+ffetaawae4.4A wwtfwwt Approach: North Bound Routh Hound Bast Bound best sound Mwemants L T- A L- T- A L- T - A L - T- A ------------I---------------II------------._.II---------------ll---------•-----I Controls Split Pbaaa Split poste 8rotrcted protected Aightas Ovl Include include Include Min, Oreens 7 10 SO 7 30 30 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lances 0 1 0 D 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 7 0 1 1 0 -._-.._-----I---------------II---------------II------_.._-----II-.-----.--.----I Volume FWdu1e. Hd6! Val: 141 11 BOB 93 27 50 14 779 67 507 864 35 Growth Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.Dp 1.00 1.90 1.oD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Baas 144 11 505 93 27 50 14 779 87 507 654 3S hddad VoL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 PaesarByWlt 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 initial Putt 244 11 305 93 27 50 14 789 67 507 867 75 Vasr Adjs 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.60 1-00 1.00 PHF Adjs 0.97 0.92 0.97 0,.97 0.91 0.97 0-92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0_91 PHF Volsanes 157 12 549 101 79 54 .15 853 95 551 942 38 Aeduct Volt 0 0 146 0 0 97 0 0 68 0 0 3 Reduced Volr 157 12 a03 101 19 7 15 853 ]0 551 942 _ 35 PCH~Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.90 1.09 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pinal volt 157 12 403 101 19• 7 i5 853 30 551 947 35 9atarat isx2 Flew Nodules Sat/Lanai 1900 1400 1900 1990 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2900 1400 1900 Adjustments 0.95 0.95 0-83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0-97 0.45 Lances 0.93 0_07 2.00 1-00 1.00 1-DO 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1-91 0.07 Final 8at.s 1672 328 3150 1730 1900 1790 1710 7x00 1759 3150 3567 133 -._---------I---------------II-------.-------il--.--..--------II--.-----^------1 Capacity Analysis Modules Vel/Bats 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.06 6.07 0.00 0.01 0.11 0.02 0.17 0.16 0.28 Crlt MOVeet wtww ftf+ wwtf rf ff Green Timm 27.5 17-5 50.3 10.8 10.8 19.8 13.8 41.1 42.1 '37.8 61.3 61.3 Volume/Capt 0.64 0.64 0.31 0.64 0.17 0.05 0.08 0.64 0.05 0.64 0.51 0.52 Delay/Veht 59.4 59.6 23.a 71.0 57.6 50.4 48.4 3B.0 25.9 47.1 70.8 70.5 User DelAdjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 i. DD 1-00 I-00 1.00 7.00 1.90 i.00 AdjDel/Vehs 59.6 54.6 13.8 71.0 52.6 50.4 48.4 35.0 24.9 42.1 20.5 70-5 LOS by Moves B+ Hr C 8 D- D D II+ C - A Gr BQ42kAvgQs 7 7 6 S 1 0 1 19 1 11 17 22 Dotes Queue reported is the number of care per lane- Traffix 7.8.0715 (ol 2006 Dowling Asroc. Licensed to CITY OF NPEP.TINO Existing + ATI a Pmjsee Tl?Ihu Oe[ 11, 2007 14,7De17, Paga 7-1 Cuper[ino TIA Iateraection Calwleti0ne LBYel Or earVlea COiIIpUtaLlOa RepOTC • 1000 ACM Opereciona Merfiod (lutuze Volume Alternative} afaN+aaffifafaaafaaaffaaaaaaaaaaalaaaa+iafaatkakk+aaaaa as kfaaafaf if klff afaff•aw inkersacelon I{7 Stavane Creak t. Mary Ava • +aaaaaata+•wfaaff affaffff aaaafaRf offfl+•fafaaaaaaf+f Rf aaa+RffwRlwtfleaf•of of•• Cycle Isaclr 7B Critical Vol./Cap. IXSr tl.488• Loos Tima (aaC)o- 11 (YaA•1.0 sac) Average Delay (sec/veh)= 11.7 Optimal cycler 46 'Level OT Service= C +•aaYaaafaaaflaaa of assaff}aaaff+aa+faf as RaRafwwf•a•afa HSf ff of+f oaf+w+wlH watl•w Approach, North Sound South Bound Eaat Sound wart Bouad MOYattltllt, L- T- R L- T - A L- T - R L- T- A CbatrOlr P1'OLac tad 9rOtlCtld PzatloLed PLOLlCCed Righter Iacluda Include Include include MSa. Graanr 7 10 30 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 10 iD Lases, 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 -_.---------~ ...............I~.-..--'---'--'-~~-..---_--_-.---~~--_-----'----_-~ volurta Module= Case v01, 27 8 19 7D 11 177 il4 1016 Ba0 737 Bab H7 Growth Adj= 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Eea, 37 8 19 70 11 171 114 1016 640 117 895 87 Added Vol, 0 0 0 14 0 70 H8 0 0 0 14 14 DaaaarByVOlr 0 0 b• 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D Inltlel Fut, 37 6 79 A4 11 192 300 1016 600 217 959 81 Valr Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 PHP Adje 0.97 0.91 0.-7 0.91 0.97 0.42 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.17 0.92 0.97 PAF volune;a 40 7 37 91 17 209 326 1104 698 736 914 98 ReduCt Volr 0 O 25 0 0 146 0 O 549 0 0 57 Reduced Volr 40 7 7 91 12 84 326 1104 148 738 93d 31 PCC Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_90 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fiaal Vale 40 7 1 81 17 64 326 1104 148 738 914 31 Saturation Plow Modular Sae/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuscmanta 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.91 Lsnea, 2.00 0.50 0.80 1.00.1.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 L.00 1.00 3,00 1.00 Final 6at.: 3150 900 900 1790 1900 1780 1790 3700 175b 1790 5700 1760 Capacity Analysis Modulo: ' Vol/bat, 0.01 0,01 D.Dl 0.05 0.01 0.04 •0.19 0.19 O.OB 0.13 0.16 0.01 Crit Movesr 1ff. aaff woos G7eea Time= T_0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 30.0 79.5 27.1 27.1 18.9 31.5 71.5 VOlUme/Cap= 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.58 O.D5 0.27 0.37 0.34 0.23 D.Sa O.S7 O.Od Oelay/Vah: 37.2 78.1 18.8 45.8 78,7 37.1 15.0 10.0 17.5 2B.D 74.] 19.4 user DalAdj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 AdjDal/veh: 32.1 28.8 18.8 4S.e 78.7 37.1 25.0 70.0 17.6 29.9 14.7 19.6 IA9 by Move: ' C- C C D c C- C a- 1 c c RC747kAVgpr 1 0 0 ] 0 7 7 7 ] 6 7 1 iwlfaa afaaa aaff+f+ala++la oaf wf Rkaf kl ifRkl+wRfa+wiffaffwflf+fatfffa+affaaaff•Jf of Notar Wean raportad is the nunmer o! cars per lane- TzalLix 7.8.0718 (OI 1008 Doarling AeeOC. Ltcaasad TA CITY OP GVPEPSINO N Ln N Existing + ATI . Project AMThu tlti 11, 1007'14:20:17 Page 8-1 Cuperclno TIT. 2acersecclon CalcutnclonB • i,avel Ot 9arvlee CompuGtlon Report 2D DO ACM operations 14ethod (Future volumn Alternacivel afaaflfRaaRfaf Rwa•w•R Ofwf1111wawafRff•tiafffwaffof +ffawiftifafRat+tff afafaff aflw IOCereeCCiOn N1 BteVeae Creek 4 BB BS Aampa Cy01e {9aD)r lI0 Critical Vol./Cap. UCIr O.Sal Loos TiOw Iaec)a 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay isec/veh): ]9.1 Optimal Cycle 37 Leval O! 9arvi car C aRklaRR if aw off++fatit aAaafaaaf as as++aa++Hlaf faf iffafaaaaafaafala Naaaaf••af affw Approach: North Bound 5oUth Bound Baec Bound weer ecund MOVemence L- T- R L T- P. L- T- A L- T- R -.--__---._-I_______________I~_______________~'__..___.________~I_______-_-_---_~ Coatzolr Permitted PsOteCCed Permitted PYOLeOtlA Aight9, Include include Include Iacluda win- Oreea, 7 1D 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 LO 30 Caries r 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1. 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 2 0 0 Volume Madula, Bgss vol, 0 0 0 5067 0 10] 0 1179 160 706 691 0 Growth AQJ, 1.00 1.00 ].00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 laitial Saa, 0 0 0 1067 0 101 0 L174 160 706 692 0 Added Vole 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 6~ 0 16 3 D Passer8yV01, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i01cia1 Futr 0 0 0 1113- 0 101 0 1180 iB0 221 69b 0 user Adj, l.oD 1.DO 1.oD 1-DO l.ao l.DO 1.00 L.DO S.DD l.DD l.o0 1.00 P4ff Adj, 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0-92.0.92 0-92 PFIF Vp1U0M: 0 0 D 1310 0 110 0 1283 196 241 753 0 RedUCt Velr 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 132 0 0 0 P.adueed Volr 0 0 0 1210 0 99 0 1203 64 141 75B O PCE Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 Piaal Vol., 0 0 0 1110 0 48 0 1201 64 741 756 0 Saturacioa Flow Nodular ' Cat/Lane. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1100 1100 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatmeatr 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 3.00 0.92 0.41 0.99 0~. 95 0.92 i.00 0,91 Lanesr 0.00 0.00 0.00 3-00 0.00 1.00 0-00 1.90 0.10 7.00 2.00 0.00 FYaal Sat e 0 0 0 x950 0 1750 0 7245 355 3150 3800 0 Capacity Analysis Modula+ Vol/Sat= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit MOYl3, +f as offs aff+ Green Sixfar D.0 O,D 0.0 34.2 0.0 34.1 0,0 79.6 ]!.B 17.0 36.6 D.0 Valuma/Capr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.64 0.54 0.54 0.42 0.00 Dolay/veh* 0.0 0-0~ D.0 20.9 0.0 19.7 •0-0 33.5 33-5 52-5 21.5 0.0 Vaar DelAdje 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjnai/veh, D.D D.o D.D zs.e o.0 1e .7 'D.o 21.6 21.s s2.s al .s o.D L09 by Move, A A A ' C A S- A C- - C- D- Ca ACM7kAvgp= 0 0 0 19 0 1 '0 10 .30 6 9 0 aafaw+f aaaf laa•+faaa+lk+l+ffafaf atfaafaafafaaa kfaalff Afal+aRaya•+flffaaaff lfwfwa Notar puma zaported Se the aumhar o£ ears par lane. TrafEix 7,8.0718 (cl 7006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed [o CITY OF CUPERTINO fJti st ing + ATI + Project AMrhu oct li, 7007 14r20r37 Page 4-1 Npartino TIA Interaaecion Calculations Laval Ol Service Compucacian Aeporc 2000 RCM Opereciana Method (Future volume Alternative) •Rrlffaaataall•a•••f aaf••f•afffa is•falaf•f+f{ar{t•a•aafr{a •aa{!•a raaa{N1rfla}a• InteraaCtian 84 Stavlns Creak A NB 85 Ramps •••a{aaaar•f•Ia af{•faa{ltifflala•f+aa tfr{••+at•Ma•l~rra{•••ia}a•rl as}f4}r+}a}•f Cycle (9ecl: 120 Critical voi ./Cap. (xl* D-699 LOB^ TSrtK (Sec)t 13 (Y+R~4.0 aeC) AVeraga Delay (oat/Whit a4,S Optimal Cycla+ 61 Level 0£ Service: C- raf•aff}fa•offflafaaaaaaaf+aa+aar4f 11aa4faaaaafa4aaa N+f+f aff+fa+aarrf•rf tff+taa Approach: North Hound Swth Hound Saat Hound west Hound MOVemant: L- T - A L - T - R L- T- R L- T- R ------------I---------------II---------------Il---------------II---------------I control. Split Phase Split Phase 4rocacted Permitted Rtghter Include Include Include Ignore Min. tlreant 7 10. IO 7 IO 10 7 10 30 7 10 10 Lane6r 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Baas Vol+ 40 L01 0 ale 9 4B5 GrOwLb Adj+ 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Saar 40 101 0 228 S 485 Added volr 0 D 3a o 0 0 PaiserSyVOlr o 0 0 0 o a Initial FUtr 40 101 31 216 s 48s Voer Adj. 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PqP Adj: 0.91 0.92 0.91 0,97 0.92 0.97 PHP Voltaner 43 110• 3T ]48 5 92T Reduce volt o 0 0 0 o a69 RedVCad Vole 43 110 37 749 5 159 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Aaj, l,oD l.DD l..aD 1.oD 1.DO l.oo Final Vol.: 43 110 27 740 s 389 881 1b74 1.00 1.00 881 1379 0 5I 0 0 9B1 1623 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 ~74D 1768 0 0 790 17c9 1.00 1.00 1-00 l.oo 740 1766 0 0 632 333 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 0 D 61Z 533 O 0 19 37 o 'D o a 0 0 691 559 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.97 0.97 b.00 0 0 697 0 0 0 0 917 0 0 697 0 l.ov l.o0 1.DO . D.oD 1.oD 1.DO 1.DO o.Do 0 0 697 0 Saturation Flow Module: SetlLaner 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3D00 1900 1900 Adj uatmcntr 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.97 LarieB: 0.46 1.15 0.39 0.65 0.01 1.34 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Bat.r 813 3076 899 1133 25 2342 3150 5700 0 b 5700 1750 ------------ --------------II----.--.....-..II.__-.--.---.---II---_--.----_---I Capacity ysic Modular tk71/Satr O.tlS 0.05 0.05 0.77 0.27 0.11 0.71 0-31 O.DO 0-00 0.11 0-00 Crlt lktvoer afff •.a• •aa. a{•a Oraaa Timer 10.0 10.0 10.0 37.1 37.2 37.7 40.0 80.8 D.0 O.D 70.9 0.0 Volume/Cape 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.71 0.71 0_36 0.71 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.71 O.DO Delay/Vehr 63.0 63.0 63.0 43.1 47.2 37.8 38.9 11.2 0.0 0.0 9D.9 0.0 Vaar DeSAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 AdjDel/Vah+ 93.0 63.0 63.0 42.7 47.1 32.8 39.9 13.7 0.0 O.D 50.9 0.0 LOS by MOVar' E S E D D C= D+ C* A A D HCM2kAVgQr 5 9 8 14 14 9 15 16 0 0 9 0 ras.{l+aaf ~.a{a qaa•+af+{aa•aaa•aata•raa ufa+fr+frlfaa4far•arre••a•+ea+•+r-f•+•< Nora: quauc reported la the oumEer of ears per lane. Traffix 7.6.0719 Ic) 1008 Dowling Assoc. LLcensnd to CITY OF CUFHRTIND N_ : W Exlating + ATI + Prof ett AMT'IIU ace 11, 7007 14x20:27 Page 10-1 Cupertino TIA lntercection Calculations Level OL Sarvlcn Cp+putation Report 100D ACM Operations Method (Future Volume AlcaznaciW) 4ef•aaafaaraasa aaaa afaaaf raaaaaafa+•ff{a•{aar•a+aaa•ar aaaaarr•lea+ar+a•aaraaa•ai Interaecclon 119 5tevena Creek 4 Stalling P.d a•aafaaa•ar•ir•a44afala•lrfal{a•alf rf•{fAf•f{a1+alaaf4fala•aaalfaaf4+f rat{a aaaa• Cycle (eeC)r 90 Critical vol./Cap.(X)+ 0.764 LDee Time (eee)+ 11 (YrR.4,0 iaC) Average Delay (sot/veh)r )9.6 Optirtmi Cfclet 87 Laval Of Service: D aaaaseaf•raaaaalafaaaaa+a•aa•affaafataraattteaaaaa++{f it•aa{a}faf•f4•aff }aa•+fff Approachr Merth eeund South Hound Ea9C HOUrid watt 2ound MDVea4atC r L- T- R L - T - R L- T- R L - T - R ------------I----------_•---II---------------II-------°-----•I I-----r-------° I Control. PZOCEC[ed PlOtaated Px'aC4lctad PLOCQCCld Righter Ineluda Include Inoluda Include Min. tlree7t+ '7 10 10 T 16 SO 7 10 30 7 LO 30 Lanest 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 D 1 Volume Module: BaBe valr 393 557 248 213 354 231 252 477 193 371 822 743 GrowOn Ad~r 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 88e+ 393 557 348 213 354 731 252 477 193 571 833 143 Added Val: 3 D 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 0 17 0 Pa9serlayvolr o 0 o D D D o D a D o 0 Initial Flitr 396 557 24B 213 3s4 239 298 4B4 195 571 839 143 Uses Ada, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PFN Ad}: 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.42 0.97 0.93 0.92 0.97 0.92 PIiF Volvmer 470 809 770 232 789 260 279 527 212 611 912 155 Reauac Vo1r D o 204 D o sob 0 o e1 0 0 i2z Reduced Volr 4]0 805 66 231 383 b4 278 927 131 871 811 33 PC8 Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 MLF Adj. L,DO S.DO l.oD 1-DD 1-00 1.00 l.DO i.oo 1.00 i.DO S.DD l.oo Final VOl.r 430 605 68 23] 3BS 54 279 527 131 631 913 33 Haeuratian flaw Modules 9aC/Lane, •1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 1.00 0.92 0.92'1.00 0.91 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.63 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 L.00 7.36 0.61 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Hat.: 1750 3600 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 4484 1114 3150 6700 1750 ------------ -------------'-II---------------II-_-_-_.-_------II-------.--.-.--i Capacity Ana ysia Module: Vol/Satr 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.13 O.1D 0.03 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.20 0.18 0.03 Grit Movesr •••• ••• Breen Times 29.~D 22.4 22-9 18.6 11-9 51-9 16-5 13.9 13_9 23.7 18.6 18.8 volume/Cap: 0.76 0.69 0.15 0.64 0.76 0.23 0.77 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.77 0.09 belay/Vah: 36.9 33.6 27.1 41.1 {B.2 37.3 48.8 42.9 41.9 37.6 3B.7 29.4 Vaar DalAdjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Vah: 36.9 33.6 27.1 41.1 98.7 J7.3 a8.8 a2.9 41.9 37.6 36.7 19.4 LOS by Movai D+ C- C D D D+ D D' A D+ D+ HCM2kAVgQ: 13 B 1 7 7 2 1D 8 8 11 10 1 f}f aar4••afa{•aafraafrllaaa{a1f{rasa airaa}f HaNta{aaffaatlaf la+It+{fa+a••1f+f-+ Nate. Ouaue reported is the number of Cass per lane. ' Traffix 7.8.071E Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed t0 CITY DP CUPERTINO Itxiaeing+ ATI r Project AMThu OCt 11, 7007 14r20e17 Page 11-1 Cupertino TIA Inteteection CalcOlations Laval 0£ Service CoBputaclon Report ]000 HCM Oparatiooa Method (Futuna VOlurne Alteroeeivel ar•raa•a HaH•••aaaaa•••aa•aa•aaafaaa•IweitaaVaaf•a;t•r\raaa••aaaaa •f at•aw\rara• Intersactioa A6 Seweas Creak k SA3C17 fofa•ra•.ofrrfr•wa•a•r•rr•rar•aaaarawa+••aa•awaaaaa••wa•rr•r•a•rwr\q •r•wrrr••r• Cycle (pe)e 110 Critical vol./Cap.(x), 0.395 Loea Time (ace), 9 (Y+R~4.0 aeG Average Delay lest/wh)r 13.7 optimal ryelee 36 Leval Ot 8ervioe: B aaaaa•araa«••.aaa•a•••a•a•as•aaraf•ra•a•aaaraaaa•rrraarrfra as as r•••.waaa•aaaa+ Approach, North Bound South Bound Ea6t 17ourM Meat Bound Mavemintr L- T - R L - T - 'R L- T - R L - T - R _____.__-_-_i_______________II.__.___________II.___._..___.___II___.___________I Control. Permitted Protected Protested Permitted Atghc6r include iaeluda include include Min. oceans 7 10 iD 7 10 10 7 10 10, 7 10 10 l:nnes, D 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Volueet HOdulsr Rase Vole 0 0 0 34 tl 103 149 1124 0 0 977 60 QY'O,Vth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.b0 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In).tial $eee 0 0 0 31 0 103 238 1124 0 0 977 60 Added Vol, 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 17 0 PasaarliyVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D initial FVtr 0 0 0 34 0 103 159.1132 0 0, 994 6D VseY Rdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P$P Adj, 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.9I 0.97 17iP VDlumar 0 0 0 37 0 112 7B7 1230 0 0 1080 e5 Reduet vole 0 D 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 41 Reduced 51b1r 0 D 0 37 0 Z3 287 1730 0 D 3080 24 PCE Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Val., 0 0 0 37 0 11 2B2 1230. 0 0 1080 74 eacuratian Plow Module, Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1100 1900 1900 2900 190b AdjtlBLmeAts 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.91 3.00 0.92 0.92 3.00 0.67 0.97 1.00 0.92 Lama, 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.b0 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Piaal Hai-, 0 0 0 1730 1900 1780 1750 8700 0 0 5700 1750 ------------ ----------•-II-......--•--•--II-----._-_---.--II--__--._.-._---I Capacity Aa yais Modular Vol/lean 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.07. 0.16 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.01 Ciit l4awar • arrr a•r• C7raan Timer D.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 30j0 41.8 91.0 0-D p.p 49.1 48.7 Velvme/Cap, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.13 0.42 0.76 O.DO 0,00 0.42 0.03 Delay/Vahr 0.0 D.0 0.0 4f .6 0.0 47.7 Z7.7 2.2 0.0 0.0 21.7 17.1 17sar DalAdjr 1.00 1.00 i.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00' Adj77a1/Vehe 0.0 D.0 0.0 49.8 0.0 47.7 J7.1 1.2 0.0 O.D 71.2 17.1 LOB 1>y MOVee ' A A A D A D~ C A ~ A A C+ ~ 8 HCM2kAVgge D o 0 1 o i e a D D B o a1•aarraarrarrr•Naaraaa•Ia•aa1•a•ar•4a•rra4a•faala t•ra~aa aaaaa\Ifarf NrNww lr•r • NOtar queue reported is ihs number of OaYS per lane. - Tretiix 7.8.0715 (c) 1006 Dowling AaaOC. Licensed to CITY OP CDPERTINO N Sxiscing +ATI + Pzoject AMThu Otc 11, 2007 1ar70,Z7 Page 12-1 Cupertino T1A tntarseecion calcvlaciena Leval Ot Service Coaputacioa P.apozc 2000 ACM Operations Method (i1cUIa Volume Alcemiciw) raalrr•afrwatrraaaataraata lawiw•1ff•ta•affwrr•aawa irfaa!••N •laaaralf aa•rafrrla• Iatereaccion N7 etewns Creek a $randley farr•a•a•••;rar•rrar+w•arraf arfwa•••4a•a••ra••1f •ran;I••a;••a•r!•a•watr•arrrlwww Cycle (eat)s 110 Cd tical Vol-/Cap. (x)r 0.409 7Ais Tima IsBC)r 12 (YaR.4.o lac) Average Delay (pr/whir 16.6 Opt lama cycler )9 Laval OE Hervicer B r•w••a••••••f+•••a•••r..a•a••.«••aa•warraaatrar•a;•a•a•aa•:•••w•••\•a•raaa•a•a• Approach, North Hound South Sound East cooed Nest 8ormd Movearentr L- T P. L- T- R L- T- R L- T - A ____________I_______________II_____________._II________.--._--II________-______I Control,a Permitted Parndtted Protected Drotected 0.lghtar Induda include include includr Min. Oraea, 7 l0 10 7 10 10 7 SO 10 7 10 10 Lame, 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1. 0 Volume MOdulee eua Volr 14 24 1 36 9 14 140 754 Ozouth Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial 8see 14 24 Z 36 9 24 150 754 Addsd val, D D o D D a o 4 PaaserByVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 Initial F11tr 14 24 2 36 4 . 2! ISO 767 t7sar AdJr 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.9I N(P VoltaOer 15 26 7 39 10 16 183 626 Aadvr:t War 0 0 7 0 0 3T 0 0 Reduoed VOlr 15 16 0 39 10 9 163 876 PCE Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 final NOl.r 35 26 0 39 10 9 160 97B 70 78 1137 108 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 79 1137 106 D o 17 0 D 0 0 0 20 29 1154 lOB 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.09 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 27 30 1254 117 9 0 0 30 13 JO 11B4 107 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.aD i,oD l.bD 13 10 1254 107 Saturation Flow Modular gat/Lane, 1900 190b 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatmente 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.99 0.98 0.92 0.92 1.00 0-92 0.92 0.99 0.98 Lanes, 0.37 0.63 1.00 0.80 0.70 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 a.75 0.75 Pinai Sat.r 6iJ 1137 1750 1490 .760 1780 17x0 3700 1790 1780 9198 447 _--___--_---I---------------II---------------II-----_--_------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Modular Vol/gate 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.08 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.24 Crit Mows. r.a• .a.. Ocean Tims, 10.0 10.0 iD.O 10.0 10.0 10.0 24.4 61.7 61.Z 38.8 63.8 61.6 volume/Capr 0.78 0.29 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.41 0.78 0.01 0.07 0.42 0.42 Delay/Vlhe 60.2 90.1 45.5 51.] 41.] 46.4 40.1 12.9 10.9 31.3 13.E 13.3 t7ser DalAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Dal/V~hr 50.2 50.2 45.5 51.3 33-3 46.4 40.1 12.9 10.9 31.3 13.3 13.3 L06 by Mow, D D ~ D- b- b b $ $+ C- B 1(CMa7e~vgge 7 a o a 2 0 9 a a 1 9 9 xoter queue zapozted is the number o£ Cars per lane. Treftix 7.8.0715 (O! 2006 DOwling Aa600. L1Cansed W CSTY OF CDPERTINO Bsciacing + ATI + Project AMThu Oct 11, 2007 14r70r27 Page 13-1 Cupar tlno TIA Interact Lion Calculaciona Le Val OL 8ezvice Cat6,uceclon Report 7000 HCM Operations Methnd (Putnra voltane Alternative) •aaiaaawafaarar•fiwawaiiwiw aitaiaw}rwaaii}•+irarwaf afaaaaaaatatiwias afr}wa+•a}f} Interaaction #8 HNlling 8 Oteenleai + raarrflraa+f iafwartaraawwwr irlaf oaf raafltiM iiliN ii aw •ii rtl aataa w•all•i•aa• Cycle (seol: 90 Critical Val./Cap.(A1r 0.671 Loss TSma Sect), 12 (Y+A.4.0 sec) Average Delay (sac/veh)x 13.2 Optimal Cyclo 49 Laval OL Service: B fralfaHawaaiwa alfaw•aaflaa•aaaawawaaaaaaaaaN+a•ra Lf iaairaawraaAfltairawrwilaaa Approaehr North Hound bbuch Bound Baat eosmd Hest HOSAtd Movement r L- i - T. L - T - A L- T- R L- T - A ----____----1---------------Il----•-•-------•II---------------II---------------! Control, IIarmittad Permitted Partni[trM Permitted Right e: Include Include include include Min. Oreeas 7 70 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lan.. r D o l r o D D D 11 D D o 6 u o 0 0 6 u o D ------------1---------------il-----------•--•Ii---------------II---------------I Volume Modulo. Hose Vol, ~ II 672 14 9 605 SO 109 20 32 34 1F 77 Clrowch Adjx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-QO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial H9er 14 677 74 9 605 50 109 70 37 34 15 37 Added Vol r 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DaaserllyVOl. D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 In1tlA1 Futs 14 678 24 9' 41] 80 109 20 32 34 1$ 32 Uaar Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Dtl l.Otl 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAF Adjs 0.97 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.9Z 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0-9I pliF volvmer i5 735 16 1D 666 9f 116 71 39 37 16 35 Haduct Vbl, 0 0 1 0 0 3 D 0 9- 0 0 78 Reduced Vole 1S 735 ]S 10 666 51 119 71 27 37 16 9 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLT Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 FSaal VO1.s 15 735 25 10 666 51 118 17 27 37 16 P ------------I-----°--------ll°--•----------il--°-----------ll---------------I Baturation llow Modulo, HdG/Lanes 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1960 AQjUatrf190 t, 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.12 0.9] 0,97 Cartes, 0.07 0.95 0.03 0.01 0.42 0.07 0.71 0.13 0.18 0.60 tl.a6 0.14 Final 8at.r 34 1669 97 24 1603 124 1747 778 291 1043 460 791 ------------I---------------il---------------II--_-_.------._-II-----.---------I Capacity Analysis Modules Vol/Sets 0.44 0.41 0.44 0.17 0.47 D. 42 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.04 0-04 0.04 Q'it MDVeai •wia r-•* 6renn TiOUS 64.7 64.2 64,2 64,7 64.2 64.7 11.8 17,9 13.8 13.9 73.8 13.8 Volume/Capr 0.82 0.67 0.82 0.58 O.9B 0.58 0.62 0.6] 0.67 0.73 0,23 0.73 Delay/Vehr 9-0 9.0 9.0 8.3 6.3 6.3 46.0 46.0 46-0 35-4 35-4 35-4 Veer DflAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vehr 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.3 6.3 8.3 46.0 48.0 46.0 39.4 35.4 35.4 L09 by lIOLO r A A A A A A D D D D+ D+ D A0112AAvgQt 12 12 17 11' 11 11 6 6 8 7 1 2 aaaawiawwrwaffaaaf awatrawAarf iaaaafa++Aaaaf r•MMrarrfrirr•wr afwiararaawaaNfrH Notar Ou4rua rapextad Sa the nuarber of care par lane. Trains 7.9.071F (c) 1006 Dowling Asax, Lieanaed to CITY OF C7IPHRTIN0 N C71 IDclacfng + ATI + Project AMThv Oct 11. 2007 14s20r27 Page 14-1 Cupertisw 7iR 2ntrraection Calculaeione Level OF 9ervica Cottpu[ecion Report .2000 HCM Operaciona Merhod (FUCUre Volume Alteri7etlvey era aawrararrarArrrraaaaaaaraaaaaiaaf iaarawwrtarawwa iwairaaararaaataaaraw rfif rf wr Iacersection #9 Stalling c McC1e11en ++waaaaa•rfaaAfaafar•if of tfaaffaafraiaaaa}ia+fiiwf rawwitaAr rf iAirfYAat}a}aaftwR, Cycle (sec). 170 Cri tlcal vol./tag.{Y.1= 0-706 tags Time (seclr 12 fY+P.r4:0 9a C) Average Delay (sec/vah)r 44.G Opcisnal Gyrcles b3 Level OL Services D rf awfa•ftlwwif wfYft+A iAa+wN iww+a 4aherawaatrraaN}R•M fatoaakrir•arafawa+aaraaa• Apptosthr florth Bound BOUth Botmd sees Bound Meat Bound Nweme,lc, L - T- R L- T - R L' - T- R L- T - A ---_________1_______________II-.-----.-------II_____________-_II---------------I Control= Pz0taeted Protected Protected Protected Rightas 1DClude Include Include Include Min. Oreens 7 SO 10 7 20 10 7 SO 10 7 10 10 Lanese 1 0 1 1 0, 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0. 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------I ...............Ii---------------II---------------II---------------i ValvsOa Modules Baas Vol, 213 666 75 113 a9 69 292 7S1 41 56 295 159 Growth Adj. l.oo l.DD 1.00 ].DO l,otl 1.00 l.DO ].oo l.oD 1.oD 1.DO 1.00 Initial Saes 713 689 75 113 69 69 742 751 di 56 795 159 Added Volr 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paeaer9yvoir 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iniclal Fucr 713 691 75 113 92 89 292 25I 41 56 Z95 159 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.a0 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 P71F Adj, 0.92 0.97 0.97 6.9] 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.97 PF(F VOlvfies 232 751 92 121 99 79 317 271 45 b1 371 173 Reriuat VOlr 0 0 38 0 0 23 0 0 11 0 0 14d Reduced Voir Z77 751 46 123 99 $a 317 773 34 61 )71 29 PCH Adj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00:1.00 1.00, MLF Adja 1-00 1.00 L-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I_00 1.00 Final Vol., 737 751 46 123 99 57 317 273 39 61 371 79 ------------f---------------1l---------------Il---------------if---------------I Saturation kloa Modvlex Sat/Lane= 1900 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuattgerit, 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.99 D-85 0-92 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.97 Lenear 7.00 1.68 9.12 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fidel Sat.. 1750 74aa 111 1780 ]474 1774 1750 1603 197 1760 1900 1750 _-_---_.----I---------------II---___.-._.-_.-il---------------II----......-._...I Capacity ADelyaie Modules vol/Hats 0.73 0.77 0,12 0,07 0.04 0.01 0.16 O.I7 0.17 0.03 0.17 0.02 Crit Moves= aril ra r. wiww aa+a Cinen Times 79.8 3b.6 36.6 11.9 I8.7 I8.7 30.8 44.3 44.3 19,2 29.7 29.7 Volume/Capr O.SJ 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.26 0.26 0.71 0.48 D.4fi 0.17 0.71 0.07 Delay/vehr 43.7 40.7 40.7 73.8 45.6 15.6 49.5 31.1 31.1 50.5 50.7 35.7 (faar De1Adj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Yeh, 43.7 40.7 40.7 73-9 45.6 46.6 49.9 31,1 31.1 50.5 50.7 35.7 IA9 by Mover D D D S D b D C C D D -D+ MCM2kAVgQr 8 14 11 8 1 3 13 9 9 7 17 1 rarltwa}aaarit if arara}atarf aaatat•aala of aLafwrawa+fawfwi aawaw rilfrkafa wf if of awaf Noce, Queue reported is the number of ears per lane. Treiilx 7.6.0715 (D) 7006 Dowling Rseoc'. LlCeDaed to CITY OF CLWEATINO 21 - 156 existing . ATI . Ptoj eoc PMih4 Sap •27, 2007 15.44+]8 Page 1-1 8xi sting + ATT . Proj~let PMThu Sep 17, 1007 15+44:28 Page 2-1 Scenario RepOtt Tzip Generation Reporc ' scenatio+ existing a ATI + Prcjeat PM Paak ' Forecast fot Project PM Caamanfl+ existing . ATI . Project PM Yolunro+ Fxiating . ATI . Projacc PM Peak Hour .' Zone ~ Race Rate Tripe Trips Total t Of Geomettyr existing +ATI . Proj PM ~ subione ~ Artrunt Unica In Ouc In Ouc 2ripa Total Fact Fev+ DaEault impact Faa , Trip ceneracion+ Projaat PM ---- ------°----- ------- -°-----~----- ------ ------ •---- -'--- ----- -°-" Trip Distribution. Daily ~ , Patba+ ~ betault Paths 1 3.00 Proj eet 49.00 103.00 49 203 352 300.0 Routea+ Datault Routes 1 1.Oa 0.06 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 Contfguration+ Default Contigurstian Zona 1 subtotal ............................. a9 101 251 100.0 ' TOTRL .................................................. 99 203 252 100.0 Trattix 7.8,0718 Icl 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to~CITY OP CUPERTiNO TraEtix 7.8.0715 (cl 200s Dowling Assoc. Licensed co CSTY OP CUPSRTINO _N i V IDcif[ing • ATZ + pr03ect PKTh11 Sep 27, 1007 15 :94:18 Page 3-1 Trip Disrsibution Report Pareen[ of Trips Daily ' TO Datea 1 2 3 4 S 6 9gRe _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ 1 40.0 30.0 5.0 7.0 3.0 15.0 Traftlx 7.8.D7IS IC) 1006 Dowling Aeeac. Licensed to CITY OF CVPSRTII3O Exl6ting + ATI + PrD3eCt ?M1'hU S!p 27, 2007 15:44x28 - Page 4-1 Taming Movement Report Pzajact PM Volums Northbound southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Laft Tisru Right Lett Thru Right 1,sft T}+ru Right Left Thru Right Volume 81 Stevens Creek E Bubb Rd Base 93 19 477 64 19 14 24 668 139 409 772 84 3081 Added 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 D 2 0 0 30 0 12 Total 93 19 477 64 19 14 24 870 139 309 781 84~ 3094 p2 Stevena Czaek G Mary Ava Baca 295 23 48 152 39 114 368 1716 586 305 1168 123 9696 Added 0 0 0 81 D 76 37. 0 0 0 6 6 176 Total 145 13 4B 103 3B 100 405 1716 596 305 1174 ~ 129 5072 93'Stevena Creak t, 8B 95 RSRQ5 Base 0 0 0 1105 6 7S1 0 1036 173 ~ 444 739 D 9351 Added 0 0 0 20 D 0 0 2 0 61 10 0 93 Total 0 0 0 1225 6 751 0 1039 173 504 749 0 4447 114 Stevens Crank i N8 85 Aanp9 ' Base 54 183 0 158 1 530 491 1909 0 0 934 949 S4D9 Added 0 0 i5 0' 0 0 0 22 0 0 71 91 199 Total 54 283 15 258 1 b30 491 1931 0 0 1005 1030 5599 ps stevens Creek a :telling nd Bas! 331 396 419 363 597 273 268 913 219 678 1292 252 5965 Added 1 0 0 0 0 3 14 30 6 0 7• 0 61 Total 331 396 414 383 Sal 376 x92 853 214 678 1299 252 6016 98 seevens Creek 4 SAICH ' Base 0 0 0 96 0 187 737 1993 0 0 1415 •60 4099 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 7 0 37 Total 0 D 0 96 0 187 337 2013 0 0 1411 so 4115 A7 Stevens Crack & Brandley • seen 70 '16 40 299 16 112 443 SSBO 53 lOS 1507 107 4338 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 7 0 37 TOtaI 7D 16 90 199 16 112 443 1630 5] 105 1514 107 4375 $e Stalling 4 Greenleaf exec 16 657 12 21 969 35• 55 11 15 2a 11 la 1869 Added o 14 0 0 3 O o D 0 0 0 D 17 Total 16 672 11 31 971 35 55 11 15 24 21 14 1996 q9 Stalling a MCGlellan Bane 129 369 72 330 626 183 174 418 129 133 3B0 154 3996 Added 0 1 0 0 6 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0' 7 Total 118 370 71 730 631 183 174 418 129 133 3B0 157 3101 1110 Base D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 O 0 Added D 0 0•~ 0 0 75 0 37 0 0 76 6 195 Total. 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 37 O D 78 6 195 Tralil% 7.9.0715 (e) 1006 DOwltag Aaeoc. LiCen9ed t0 CITY OF CUFSRTINO • v IJ i Sxi~cing + ATI + Fzoyect PMThu Sap 27, 2007 15~44i26 Page 4-2 Volume Norehbound Southbound Eastbound westbound Total Type Lett Thou Right Lelt•Thzv Right Letc Thru Right lair Thru Right Volume Trattix 7.8.0715 Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Lioensed t0 CTTY OF COPRRTINO N Ln CO ExiBLing + ATI + PLOjeCt PMThp Sep 27, 2007 15~44~29 Page 5-1 Ts~act Analysis Report Level Ot Service Intersection ~ Bass Future .Change Del/ V/ Dal/ Y/ in LOS veh C LO5 Veh C A 1 5kevens CYeak i Buhb Rd C 2T.4 0.684 C Z7.3 0.684 -0.040 D/V 8 2 Stavene Creek & Mary Ave C-, 34.4 0.716 D+ 37.1 0.752 + 2.706 D/V 8 3 Stevens Creek b SS 85 Ranps C- 34.9 0.650 D+ 36.3 0.874 + 1.390 D/V x 4 Stwena Creek i NB 65 Ranps D+ 37.q 0.798 D+ 38.4 0.608 + 0.949 D/V ~ S Stevens Creek E 6tellfng Rd E+ 56.4 0.902 E+ 57.3 0.910 s 0.9D0 DN 6 6 Stevens Creek c SAICR 8 14.9 0.644 A 14.6 0.549 -0.064 D/V * 7 Stevens Creek k Rrandley C- 33.1 0.667 C- 33.0 0.864 -0.052 D/V ~ B SteLling 4 CraenleaF B 14.7 0.605 8 14.6 D.BOa + 0.178 D/V If 9 Stalling 4 McClellsn D 46.6 0.818 D 45.7 0.618 + 0.07E b/V TraFEix 7.8.0719 Ic) 7006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed co C]:TY OF CUPERTINO Dtl sting + ATI + 8roj act PMThu Sep 37, 2007 15:44 e29 Page 6-1 Level Of 8ervlce CaspuCaCion RepOZt. 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Velsare Altarnaclve{ a•••fwr••awa•••w•rwaaa•a••••wa.•we•••••rew•rwa•r•rr•frw•••••tr•rtr••wrrrwrawaa.+ InCerssctien ({1 Stevens Creek L Bubb Rd . ••aw+••••wr•awwa•a•rtar.•w•••.awe••ww•••ar••e•••••••waaaaaa•ra•w•a•aa+.w«•watww Cycle (sea). 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(X{, 0.654 Loco Time~(sec1, 12 (Y+Ria.O sec) Average Delay (set/veh)r 27.3 Optimal Cycler 55 Leval Ot Service, C ••aaa«.a•r•.•a••••••«a•••••arar•wwa••aawaawa a••wrr•r•••••a•rw ••w•a•awa••:a•r•r Approach:, North Bound South sound East Hound Kest Bound MOVa07ant, L- T- R L- T - R L- T- R L- T- R -____..-._--I_______________II--______-_.__-_II_______________II-.-.--.....-.--I Controlr Split Pheae Split Phaaa Protected Protected Rlghcs, Ovl include include 2nelude Min. Creens 7 10 10 7 10 30 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lass4sar 0 1 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 ~1 2 0 1 1 0 volume Module, Baca VO1: 93 19 477 64 19 14 29 86a 139 504 772 B4 Oroxth Adj: 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Dser 93 19 477 64 19 14 24 868 139 504 773 B4 Added Vol, 0 0 0 O 0 0 D 2 0 0 30 0 PasserSyVOlr 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Pots 93 19 477 69 19 14 24 870 139 509 7B2 04 User Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 PNP Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 O.f3 0.92 D.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.92 PRF VoluOre I01 21 510 70 21 19 26 946 151 553 B50 91 Aeduct Vol, 0 0 237 0 0 13' 0 0 99 0 0 s Reduced Wlr 101 31 301 7q ZL 2 ]6 940 62 953 B50 83 PCE Adjr 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.tl0 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLT Adjr 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 I.00 3.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Plnal vol.r 101 11 301 70 21 2 26 949 S2 953 850 62 ___---------I_______________II___________._..II---------------II---------------I 9atvratiw Flow Module. Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 2400 1900 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatmantr D.9S 0.95 0.03 0.92 1.OD 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.9t 0.95 Lanes, O.B3 0-17 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.82 0.18 Final 9ae., 1499 309 3180 1730 1900 1750 1750 3600 1750 3150 3369 330 Capacity Analysis Modules . Vol/sat: 0.07 0.07 0.10 D.04 0.01 0.00 D.OL 0.25 0.03 O.SB 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves, •w•• arr.. •w.a .. Omen Tisna, 12.1 12.1 43.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 I5.3 44.8 44.5 31'4 60.6 60.8 Volume/Caps 0.62 0.82 0.24 0.94 0.12 0.01 0.11 O.fi2 O.OT 0.62 0.46 0.46 Vnilotm Dtl, 46.7 46.7 22.7 47.3 46.0 45.5 91.9 26.0 30.I 34.1 19.8 14.8 IncromnCDOls 13.5 13.5• 0.5 8.5 1.4 0.2 0.9 1.9 0.3 3.1 0.7 0.7 IniCQuauDllr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-00 Delay/Vehs 60.2 60.2 32.7 B5.8 47.4 45.7 42.3 37.8" 20.1 37.2 15.6 15.6 vier DelAdjr i.oo S.oo l.oa l.oo l.oD i.oD 1.00 l.o0 1.00 ~S.aD I.oD I.aa AdjDel/Vehs 60.3 60.2 12.7 65.9 47.4 45.7 92.3 27.6 20.3 ]T.2 15.6 19.6 LOS hY MOVe, S 8 C+ E+ D D D C Cs D+ B ACM2kAvgQ: 5 S a 3 1 0 1 13 1 30 10 i9 w•t•a•/r•••a••rw•w••.a•waarwwra/l•wwi+la••waa••••waaaaa•aw•+wY••w•aaaaa.a•1.Iwwaa Notes Queue reported Se the number of care per lane. Trafflx 7.6.0713 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed t0 CITY OF CVPEATINO O Etiacing + ATI + Pmjoct PMThu Sap 37, 2007 15:44,29 Page 7-I Level Of Service Co+rputation Report 2000 NCM Opezations Method IPUCUre Volume Alcernativa) raa.w.w:•way.ew•a•aw••+•w••••w••w•w•wwwrraw•rr•••r a••.a••r•a••.aaara•.aaw.•••aa• Intersection 82. Stevens Creek 6 Mary Ave a+w••awwrr•rr••w•r•«awwwr•ra•wwrr•••••w•r.•r•aa+••wrp+•www•w•w.•araar•r••wr Cycle (sac), 100 critical Vol./Cap.(XIr 0.752 LDas Tlma (sect: 12 (Y+R•4 .0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh{r 37.1 Optimal Cycles 67 Level Of serviear D+ w•w•a••wwt••fa••••rt••a•rw••w••wwa••a•a•••+•awr•llw a••waaaa•waa•••rif•YIw•a•a••• Approach: North eotsnd South Bound Ease Sound Kest Bound Mevemen[r L- T- A L- T • R L- T - R L- T - A ____-_______I_______________II______-________II____-_--__-___-II_____-____.____I Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: include Include Include Include MSn. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 7 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II----------•----ll---------------I volume Modular Bass Vols 245 23 40 153 38 124 36B 1716 506 305 1160 123 Growth Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Hae, Z45 23 40 152 38 13a 36B 1716 5B6 3D5 iL68 127 Added VOlr 0 0 0 B1 D 76 37 0 0 0 6 8 PaasarByVOls 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Futr 245 23 90 203 3B 200 405 1716 BBB 3D5 1174 129 Veer Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 PNF Adjr 0.93 0.92 0.02 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 D.92 PNF VO1t1R~r 266 25 SS 221 41 217 490 1865 fi37 332 1276 140 AedUCG Volr 0 0 43 0 0 108 0 0 1SB 0 0 BB Reduced Valr 266 25 9 221 41 109 440 1665 479 332 1376 51 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 Z.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final val., 366 25 9 221 91 109 940 1889 479 332 1376 92 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation FSOw Module. sat/Luis, 1900 1960 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjvatmentr 0.a3 0.95 0.9b 0.92 1.00 0.93 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.93 Laaea: 2.00 0.73 o.a7 z.oD 1.60 S.oo 1.oD 3.00 S.oa 1.00 3.Da S.Do Final Sat.s 3150 1317 983 1750 3900 1750 1780 5700 1750 1730 5700 1790 ---------_.-I---------------II---------------il-------....-.--!l-----------..._I Gnpacicy Analysis Modulo: Vol/bat, 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.13 0.02 0.06 0.25 0.33 0.27 0.19 0.22 0.03 Crit Mave6, +r+f •aa• »•• •r•• Green Tima s_ 11.6 10.0 10.0 35.3 13.7 13.7 12.2 39.7 39.7 23.0 39.5 29.5 Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.19 0.19 O.B2 0.16 0.46 0.76 0.82 0.69 0-62 0.76 0.10 Uhitorm Del, 43.7 41.3 41.3 41.0 38.3 39.7 29.8 27.0 25.0 36.6 32.0 29.6 IncrertntDllr 12.1 2.3 2.3 34.1 1.3 6.1 9.D 3.6 5.5 17.2 1.3 '0.4 InitpuaODalr o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 6.0 Delay Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Vehr 54.8 43.6 43.6 65.2 39.4 45.9 30.8 30.6 30.9 53.0 35.3 36.0 veer Dalndj, 1.00 l.DO 1.0o I.ao 1.00 l.oo I.oo i.oo 1.00 1.oa l.o0 1.00 Adj Del/Veh, 54.6 43.6 43.6 68.2 39.4 48.0 70.a 30.6 ]O.S 63.0 35.3 36.0 LOS by Mover D- D D E D D Dr C C D• A+ ACM2kAvgQ, 6 1 1 10 1 4 35 19 14 13 13~ I ra•rrar•raartw•wa••a•4aaaaw«•w•ra•fwrt•w••iww•••fa Mrr•••rt•w••a•wwwrra}f aftfaa• Nocar Qu4:ue reported is the number of Cara par lane. Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUP6ATIN0 Existing + AT1 + Proj acC PMThu Sop 27, 2007 15.44:29 Page B-I Leval OL Servlce CompuCatian Report 2000 ACM Operatlona Method (Future volume A1Cernativa} ••r•••aw•rr•ffr«rf•••.••w•.rrarrrrrra\rrrra+••faara••f•rffffrrrrwf•r•++w•wa•rafr Intersection #t3 Stavena CZeek [. SB 85 Aampa «a«a•f«rwwrr••\a•twice••ff•wrrr«fafr«•a••««•waaa•a•wf aa•H \lwwr••aawaaw•aaaa«rrr Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap. {X}, O.B74 Loss Time (earl:. la (YaR•4.0 sae) Average Delay (sec/veh)r 36.3 Optinnl Cycle, 103 Level of Servlcer D. a •f rfrrrr•ff••a4••rfrwwfrrlw••wa•rfr•aa«arfr\•wrrr•\rrlw ••rf r•••rrfrw•rwfwwwfff• Appmnch: North Hound South Hound Hasc aound weal Barad Movement: L- T - A L- T- A L- T- R L- T- A ------------1-------••------ll-------------••II----------r----ll--._...--------I Contzolr Protected Protected Protecte0 Protected Rights: Include Include include include Min. Green, 7 10 10 T 10 10 7 10 30 7 30 10 Lanee+ 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 Z D 2 0 0 ._-.-._....-I---------------II---------------II--.____.-_---_-II--_.-----------1 volume Modulo, Bees volt 0 0 O iZ05 8 751 0 1076 173 444 739 0 orowth Aajr i.o0 1.00 1.00 l.ao 1.00 1.00 l.ao i.6o l.Da 1.00 1.oa 1.oD Initial Bsar 0 0 0 1105 8 751 O 1038 173 444 739 0 Added Vol, 0 0 '0 20 0 ~ 0 0~ 3 0 61 10 0 Pasaer-yVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Futr 0 0 0 1225 6 751 0 1038 173 bos 749 0 user Adjr 1.00 1.ao 1.0o i.oo 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 P!ff'Adjr O.B7 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0..92 PFIP' VOliaaar 0 0 0 1331 7 Bib 0 1128 1B8 549 814 9 Reduct Volr 0 0 0 0 O 30 0 0 152 0 0 0 Reduced Val, D 0 0 1332 7 786 0 1328 36 549 814 0 PGs Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.6o i.oo 1.00 1.00 i.oo l.DO i.oo 1.00 i.o6 PbF Adjs 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.r 0 0 0 1333 7 786 D iia8 38 549 814 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II-----•-------••I Saturation Fla. Module, Sat/Lietle: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1909 1809 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment. 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83.1.00 0.92 Lancer 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.89'0.01 1.00 0.09 3.87 0.11 a.ao a.oo 0.00 Final Seta 0 0 0 4926 14 1750 0 7167 132 3150 3800 0 ----.....---I----------°---II------------°--II---------------II------------...I Capoeity Analyaie Modular VO1/SSCr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.77 0.45 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.21 0.00 Crit MOVBa: ••\• wire. fww. Green Timer 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.8 56.5 56.5 0.0 19.5 19.5 21.9 41.5 0.0 Voluare/Cap. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.53 O.B7 0.00 0.87 0.87 '0.87 0.57 0.00 Ilni Laren Dai: O.D 0.0 0.0 17.8 17.8 23.6 0.0 44.0 14.0 42.T 27.a •0.0 Incremnt0e2r o.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 11.5 0.0 8.2 B.2 15.8 1.6 0.0 TnltOUeu0elr 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adjr 0.00 0.110 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Vahr D.0 0.0' 0.0 18.8 18.6 35.1 o.D 57:2 51.2 58.3 28.8 0.0 veer DelAdj: l.DD i.oo i.6o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oa 1.00 1.00 i.aa Adj Del/Vehr 0.0 0.0 0-0 1Y.6 18.8 35.1 0.0 51.2 51.2 58.3 28.8 0.0 L08 by Mover A A A B- H- D+ A D- D- 54 C ACMZlyvgQe 0 0 0 12 12 28 0 I3 13 14 11 0 \fr\ww•fwrrf ref\Iffrrlrlr•w•afflfaff rrr rfrrfw«wraf aaara\r•rrrrw flit}arrr«f \r•rr• Nocer puaue reported is the number oI care pot lane. TraLLix 7.8.0718 /c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUPERTINO N CO Existing + ATI +~PiOjeCE PMThu Sep 17, 1007 i5s44r29 Page 9.1 Level OL Serv1Ce COmputaiion RepOCC x000 RCM Opezationa Hethod {Future Volume ASCernative) a•w••+•fr•\r•\rr••arraaa•.•«+rw«u•rawfr•rr«•w••ra w••rrrw•«r•ff\wrwrrr»r•rrrraw Intersection q4 Scavena Creak b NB 89 Ramps • ••a•a«i wf«rr••wf rr•r•rears•waaral•r•r••••r•a••f•a•rr\«f w••r•••arf •f ••\rrfrrrwrrw Cycle (aer)r 110 Critical vol./Cap.4x): D.BOB Loss Time (see), I2 (Y+R-4.0 see) Avexaga Delay {sec/vah)r 39.4 Optimal Cycles 82 Level 04 Sorvtcer D+ •farr•r rfwa••••r1r\rrrwwl!•wraaa•r•raa«.«•r«\f•!wr•w•fr\•wa•\r«ra•rr•a«•aaM••w•w Approachr North Bound South Bound Eact Bound west Bound MOVeaasnC: L- T - R L - T - R L- T - R L- T - R Conctolr lit Phaae Split Phase Protected Protected Righter Include include Include Ignore Min. Greent 7 10 1D 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes s 0 1 0 1 0 0 O i t 0 1 Z O 3 0 0 0 0 3 9 1 volume Module: Base Vol: S4 283 0 2S6 1 530 491 1909 0 9 834 949 Growth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lnittal Bse: 54 183 0 258 1 530 491 1909 0 0 934 949 Ached vol. 0 0 15 0 0 0 o z1 0 0 7i e1 PaeaarByVOl, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 initial Fut, 54 aB3 15 358 1 510 491 1931 0 0 1008 1030 veer Adjr 1.00 l.oo l.o0 1.oD l.o0 1.00 l.oo i.oo 1.oa 1.oD 1.oD o.oo PfiF Adjs 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.91 O.Ba 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9Z 0.00 PHP Volume: 59 308 16 280 I 576 534 2099 0 0 1092 0 Reduct volt 0 D 0 D 0 279 0 0 0 D 0 0 Reduced Volr 59 308 16 180 L 297 334 2099 0 0 1092 0 PCE Adjr ~ 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.00 Final Val.r S9 308 16 280 1 297 934 1099 0 0 1092 0 ____.._._...I_______________II-_________-----II___________._--ll_________._____I Saturation Flow Module, SaL/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 Adjustments 0.95'0.95 0.96 0.92.0.92 0.92 0.63 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lenesr 0.31 1.61 0.08 0.65 0.01 1.34 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.r 5S2 2094 153 1141 4 235'9 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750 _..._._.-___I---------------II-----------•---li•-_--_-_---...-II--__.____.__---I Capaelty Analysis Module. Vol/Satr 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.17 0.37 O.DO 0.00 0.19 0.06 Crit MOVeer a••• •••• ••wr war' Green Timer 14.5 14.5 14.5 33.9 33.4 73.4 23.5 50.1 0.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 Volume/Cape O.Bi O.a1 O.B1. 0.61 0,.81 0.42 0.79 0.81 0.00 9.00 0.79 0.00 Vniiorm De1r 46.4 46.1 46.4 35.3 35.3 30.5 40.9 25.8 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 Incremntbelr 13.8 13.8 13.8 9.6 9.6 0.9 9.] Z.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 Initl]ueuDalr D.D O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 belay Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-QO 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/vehr 60.3 60.3 60.3 44.9 44.0 31.4 50.2 28.6 0.0 0.0'43.9 0.0 veer aelAdjr i.DO i.oD 1.00 1.0o s.oD 1.DO 1.0o i.oo l.oo i.oa 1.06 i.oo AdjDel/Vehr 60.3 60.3 60.3 49.9 44.9 •31.4 50.2 28.6 0.0 0.0 43.9 O.D LOS by Moves S S B b D C D C A A D A HCM1kAVgQ, 9 9 9 17 17 7 12 22 0 0 13 0 •\rlrs\«•«\r«r••rr•\f•wa•r•fw•«1\\••\rr••f•«saw}af•wwwrrrr•rf•««}«araw••ww•rf«•r Note, Queue reporCed is the nur~sr oL ears per lane. TraLLix 7.8.0715 (cl 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OP CUPBRTINO Existing + ATI + Proj sct PMThu Sep 77, 20D> 19+44+29 Page 10-1 Leval Df Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Methvd (Furors Volume Alcemative) •rrAar•aa•aaaaa4raala4ra}Aarra•alf arraAaa•aataaArA1!•«aAaararA•wAa}eases •f a•aRa! lntazaaetian #5 Stevens Creek s Scellinq Rd «4arlwa•f}ara•!rlaalaaa•AAAaarsaafaraaraar••aAM4••a ass •aa•A•aaaaraAAarra•aaAra• Cycle (sac)+ 120 Critical vol./Cap.(Xlr o.9io Loaa. T10+e (ace)s 12 (Y+Rr1-0 aeC) Average Delay (Sec/vsh1+ 57.3 Optimal Cycler 126 Level Of Sarvicer B+ }fr!•lwrrsrr!}a••AIrlaa••aawa wfrarwlrrwsarf aAarAlar•}aaa•araw•rw.•r4rr•ar rw/}rata Approachr North Bound South Bounfl £est Bowrd Mast Bound MoVamenta L- T- R L- T - R L- T- A L- T- R wotrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected Righter Sntltlde Include Include Include Min. Green+ 7 10 10 7 10 1D 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanas+ 1 D 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2' 1 0 7 0 3 0 1 Valuma~Madu]ar Bass Volr 331 ]96 414 383 547 273 266 923 71@ 675 12@2 253 Growth Adj: S.DO i.oo 1.0o I.oO Lao l.oo 1.00 1.DD i.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse, 331 396 414 3@7 B47 7» 26@ 923 21@ 618 1282 252 Added vvl: 1 0 0 0 0 3 14 30 6 0 7 0 PeseerByVOlr' D 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 tl Initial FuC+ 332 396 '414 3B3 B47 276 282 953 224 678 1289 d57 Veer Adja 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 PRP Adj+ 0.91 0.91 0.97 0-92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PRP VOlumer Dal a30 450 416 595 300 307 1036 243 737 1403 274 Reduet Volt 0 0 337 0 0 737 0 0 77 0 0 179 Reduced Vol+ 361 430 113 416 590 63 307 1036 210 737 1401 95 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Ob 1.00 1.00 ].00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.r 381 430 113 416 595 S1 307 1036 210 777 1901 95 8aturae'ion Flow Modules ' Sat/Lanes 1900.1400 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 1900 1900 Adj ustmanta 0.92 1.00 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.97 0.92 0.99 0.98 0:@3 I.00 0.92 Lana9+ 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 7.47 O.b3~ 2.00 3.00 1.00 .Final Sat.r 1750 3900 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 4653 946 3150 5700 1750 Capacity Analysis Moduler Vol/Sat+ 0.21 0.11 0.08 0.74 0.16 0.04 o.iB 0.72 0.12 0.23 0.25 0.05 Crlt Moves+ fr•r arrw rwrr •A«a Groan Time+ 27.2 15.4 15.4 32.4 20.6 20.5 25.0 29.3 79.3 30.0 36.1 35.I Volume/Cap. 0.91 O.BB 0.50 O.BB 0.91 0.21 O.B4 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.84 0.19 Wlfotrn Delr 45.2 51.4 46.7 42.0 98.8 47.7 4b.5 44.0 44.0 43.2 39.8 31.7 InczermtDel, 27.4 19.9 7.8 20.5 19.0 1.6 70.1 10.6 10-6 16.1 5.7 0.0 InitquluDel, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Vehr 72.6 71-3 56.5 62.4 67.8 44_3 65.7 54.6 54.6 59.4 95.0 32.5 veer DelAd3r 1.00 1.00 I-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veha 77.6 71.3 56.5 62.4 67.8 44.3 65.7 64.6 54.6 69.4 45.0 32.5 705 by Mow1 B £ S+ B £ D £ D- D- S+ D HCM2kAvggx 18 11 S 19 14 2 14 19 19 70 1@ 3 raa aw •aarwrawra••r•rraaalarraaaaa aalaraaNar•arAaaaaaaaAaaawa••aA •aAwr•a••rraawa Nota+ queue reported is the number aP cars per lane. TraLlix 7.8.0715 (e3 7006 Cowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUFSRTINO N CO N fi%isting + AT] + Project PMThu Sep 27, 2007 15.44+29 Page 11.3 Level Of Service Computation AepoYL 2000 RCM Operations Method IPUtura Volume 'Alternative) •aalaa•as#!}raaaaaaaraaaaralaraaaaAfaf 4r•{«a}ar•aawwaalAM aaraa4aaaalaffawrf wra• intersecCion }r6 Stewns Czeek & SAICH •aa wa •AArAMA+{a}stars afara•afer}aAk•aaaaaarw•aaaaaa4}aaaAlw•waI•afasralaa•4•aaa• Cycle (secl, 119 CYleical vol./Cap.(x): O.s45 Loes Time (eec), 9 IY+Ra9.0 sec) Awraga Delay lace/whir 14.8 optimal Cycler 37 Leval Oi Servicer B a!laaaa}ralaarAaaaa•faraMaiaaw•a••ra1•ra•aara•r•wraaarawaAraf!l4w4a••A1w 4•}}4aa} Approach+ North Bound South Bound Bast Bound went Bound Movement, L- T R L- T- R L- T - A L- T - R Cantrolr Pasmitted Protected Protected Permitted Rights. Taciude include Include include Min. Gzaenr 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 l0 1D 7 30 30 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ,i 1 0 3 0 0 D D 3 0 1 Volume Module+ Bese VO1+ 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 1993 0 D 1415 60 Growth Adj, 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 Initial Beer 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 1893 D 0 3919 s0 Added vol+ o a o 0 0 0 D. 3o D o 7 0 PasaerByVOl: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Initial Pair 0 0 D 96 0 187 337 2023 D 0 1422 60 User Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF-Adj+ 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0-92 0.92 0.92 0.97 ,0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PRF Valumea 0 0 0 104 D 203 366 2199 0 0'1546 66 Reduet Volr 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 40 Reduced Volr 0 0 0 107 0 35 36a 2199 0 0 1546 25 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vole o -0 0 104 0 35 366 7199 0 0 1546 25 __-___...___~---------------~~.____.____...__~~________..-----11____..__-_...._~ . Saturation Fla+ Modular ' Sat/Loner 1900 i900~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I900 1900 Adjustmss+Lr 0..92 1.00 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.97 Lanese 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.+ 0 0 0 1750 1900 1750 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 Capacity Aaalysis Moduler Vol/Satr 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0.06 0.00 0.62 0.21 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.01 Crit Movesr aaaa Green Tima: 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 12+2 39.1 09.0 O.D 0.0 50`7 50.7 volume/Capr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.20 0.59 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.03 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.2 D.0 45.3 28.9 7.0 ~0.0 0.0 21.9 16.1 IRCreReltDel+ 0.0 0.0 0.0 i3.S O.D 2.5 4.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 Inicqueunel+ D.D o.a o.D o.D a.o o.D D.o o.o D.D o.o o.o D.D Delay Adje 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Vehr a.0 0.0 0.0 60.7 '0.0 97.8 32.9 3.4 0.0 0.0 27.9 16.3 User DaLAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Oti 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Dal/Vehr 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.7 0.0 47.0 32.9 3.4 0.0 0.0 72.9 16.3 1.09 by Moves A A A fi A D C- 0. A A C+ B RCH2kAvgq: 0 0 D 5 0 i~ li B 0 0 13 0 .a•aaaarwaa..ra•«.a}aarrraA.raawr•as•.•aa•Aw••rr.•a.we4fa«•aa.aaa.aaa ra4wfrwar•a Motet queue reported i^ the Wombat of care per lane. ' TraPL1x 7.B.D715 (e) 2006 Deviling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CIJPSRTIN0 Existing + ATI + Project PMThu Sep 27, 2007 15.+44+29 Page 12-1 Laval of 5erviee Computailon Rapozt 2000 xCN operations Method (PUtwce volume Alternative) N Nu • •faN•a••••:••a•r•a•.a••rra N•Na•N N..••ff.r•Aa ••••rN •a•aaNNNN intersection 97 Stevens Creek & 8sandlay • r ••N••f••a••N Nff••••••N•••wN•ff•aw•wafN a•aawafiaaNwa Nf•Nw•+•.N•a Cycle (sec)t i10 Critical Vol./Cap. IXls 0.864 LOas Tima (¢ec)+ 12 (YaR-4.0 aec) Average Daley (seC/veh)r 33.0 OptiBnl Cycle: 99 Level' OE $arvi car C- •faf•aaa N•aa•af Af waf•Na•NN•N ••wwwN••N wawawf oaf •a•+•waa•awa •wN N•N 1•wr •a Approeeh+ NOSCh Hound SOUth 80und boat Boaltad Neet Hotutd MOValmant+ L- T - R L- T- R L- T - R L- T - R Controls ... Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Righter Include Include inelude include Min. Oreenr 7 20 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanea: 0 1 0 0 1. 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 Volume MOdula+ Baas Vols 70 16 40 289 16 112 Growth Adj: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse+ 70 16 40 289 18 113 Added VOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOls 0 0 0 0 0 0 initial Futs 7D 16 40 289 I6 112 Vser Adjs 1.00 7.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DKF Adj= D.97 0.92 0.97 b.91 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 76 17 43 314 17 127 Redact Volr 0 0 28 0 0 61 Reduced Vol+ 76 17 28 314 17 41 PC6 Adj+ I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 MLF Adjr S.oo 1-0o s.oo 1.00 1.oa l.oo Fines Vo1.s 76 17 i8 114 17 al 493 15 A0 l.DD 1.oa 443 1560 0 30 0 0 443 1630 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 482 1790 0 0 487 1750 l.oo l.oo 1.DO l.oo 483 1750 53 105 1507 107 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 53 109 1507 107 0 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 53 105 1514 107 l.o0 1.00 I.oo I-oD 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 58 114 1646 Ilfi 7 0 0 21 51 114 1646 92 1.00 l.o0 1.00 S.oa l.DD 1.00 1.0o S.oo 51 114 1646 92 9atuzation F1Wr Module+ Sat/Lent.: 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjusta0eat: 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.49 0.95 LanaSr 0.8I 0-19 1.00 0.99 O.OS 1.00 1.00 3-OD 1.00 1.00 Z.83 0.17 Final Sat_r 1465 3I5 1750 1706• 94 1750 1730 5700 IT50 1750 5302 297 ------------F---------------II-----___-------1t---------------ii---------•-----I Capacity Analysis Modules Vol/bats 0.06 0.08 0.01 0-18 0.16 0.02 0.78 0.31 0.03 0.07 0.31 O.al CriC Mouser w•ww w••r wfaf Green Tir0er 23.4 23.4 73.4 23.4 23.4 23.9 35.0 61.5 61.5 13.1 39.5 ]9.5 volume/Cap, 0.74 0.14 0.05 0.66 0.86 0.11 0.86 0.55 0.05 0.55 0.86 0.A6 9nitorm Dels 35.9 35.9 34.4 41.7 41.7 39.9 35.2 15.4 I1.0 48.7 32.7 32.7 InCZarmtDalr 1.8 1.8 0.7 11.9 21.9 0.6 16.2 0.7 0.1 30.1 8.1 8.2 InitpuauDalr 0.0 D_0 D.0 0.0 D_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Ob 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dllay/Vehr 37.4 37.E J4.7 63.7 63.7 35.5 51.5 16.1 11.2 5B.A 38.0 38.0 UseY DelAdj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1-00 Adj [xi/Vehr 37,4 i7,4 34.7 63.7 63.7 35.5 91.5 I6.1 11.1 55.A 38.0 38.0 LO0 by MOVea D+ D+ C- b b D+ D- B H+ B+ D+ KCM7)r7lvgpr 3 7 1 14 li 1 19 13 1 6 2I 21 •wf••f•+awN•i awa••N wa•} a•NN•N•N•N••••N•f••••w•af••!••••••f •R••wwff#waaa• Nato+ Queue reported is the number of ears pet lane. Trattix 7.8.0715 (cl 2006 Dowling Assoc. LtCansad to C2TY OF CUPBRTINO IV + W Exlating + ATI + Proj cat PMThu Sep a7, 2007 15x94+29 Page 13-1 Level OE Service Computation Rapozt av00 BCM Operations Method (Future volume Alternative) •NfNf •N N•N a••Na•!•+•wN•wfff•aNfNNNwf•f •f ff ••N•N•aN NN fr••N NfNa intersection >R8 Stalling i GreenleaE f•uNa••:wNaf•aNN••aNN•f•NN•aff.Naaaf•wNwaaNrarara+aN UwwraNaawa afa Cycls (seals 80 Critical Voi-/Cap.l%)+ 0.808 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+A~l.0 secl Avarega Daley (sec/vehl+ 24.8 Optimal Cycles 77 L+tvel Ot Seiviee: B w•ra•a.Nffa•wNNa•rw•aaaawwww w•awafNNfaawNrafaa•ua•faaa•MwNNwaa••••N wa Approachr North Bound 9w th Hound bast Bound Mcst Bound Movementr L- T ~- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R COntrola Permitted .Pam~itted Permitted Permitted Rights. Include Include include include Min. Greens 7 10 10 a 10 10' 7 10 10 7 l0 30 Censer 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 if Q O 0 0 11 0 0 volume Module. Base Vbls 16 657 12 21 968 35 55 11 25 24 21 74 Growth Raj. l.o0 1.00 i.DO 1.00 1.DO S.oD 7.00 1.0o S.oD 7.0o S.DD l.oo Initial Bser 16 657 12 21 968 3S SS 11 75 14 21 14 Added VoI= 0 L4 0 D 3 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 PADSerByVO1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fat: 16 671 12 21 971 35 56 11 25 24 21 24 User Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAL' Adj= 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 FRF Volumes 17 724 13 23 1055 38 60 12 27 26 23 76 Reduot vol= 0 0 1 0 0 2 a 0 12 D o 20 Reduced Vol+ 17 729 I2 23 1055 36 60 12 15 26 23 6 PCs Adj:. 1.00 1.DO i.o0 l.oD 1.00 1.00 L.oo i.oo i.o0 l.oD l.DO l.oo MLF Adj= 1.00 1.00 L.oa I.oo l.ao S.oo l.oo~l.oo l.oo l.o0 1.00 I.oo Final Vol : 17 729 12 23 1055 38 60 12 15 26 '23 6 --------°I---------------II---------------II--_-________---II^-------__-----I Saturation Flow Module: Sac/Lanes 1900 1900 •1900 1900 1900 19ab 1900 190a 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetment+ 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 Lanese 0.02 0.96 O.D7 0.02 0.94 0.03 0.69 0.14 0.17 0.47 0.42 0-13 Final Sat.. 40 1682 28 36 1656 57 1204 241 306 030 726 194 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------il---------------I Capacity Annlyaia Modules Vol/Sat+ 0-43 0.93 0.43 0-60 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.94 4.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 Crit Mavesa +•++ •••a Green Tie+er 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 88.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 30.0 volwne/Cap. 0-60 0.60 0-60 0.80 0.68 0.09 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.25 UnlTarn Del+ 5.3 9.3 5.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 32.2 32.2 32.3 31.8 31.6 31.8 IncremntDel+ 7.7 7.1 1.1 8.e 8.8 8.8 5.3 5.3 S.3 7.7 2.7 2.7 IaitOuauDals 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 D.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj+ l.oo S.oo 1.oD I.oa l.DO S.oo l.oo l.oa i.0o L.DD 7.00 1.06 Delay/Veh+ 7.4 7.4 7.9 17.1 Y7.1 I7.1 ]7.S 37.5 37.5 74:4 74.4 74.4 Vser bslAdj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/veh= 7.4 7.4 7.4 17.1 17.1 17.1 37.9 37.s 37.5 34.4 34.4 34.4 LO9 by Movl+ A A A B 8 B D+ D+ D+ C- C- NCM2kAvgQ: 30 10 LO 26 26 26 3 7 7 2 2 2 fAaA••ff#AAA••wAAAwarr•••Fffa Lafawr•w+•N••aaltaafaaaN Na•aeaaflawfaa•eaf iffaf• Notes Queue reported is the number of ears per lane. 7'ratEix 7.8.0738 (c1 20D6 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OP CVPSRTINO N OtTSSa9df1~ 30 7I.LIJ oI paaua~TZ •Oasay BuTL~wa '4 DOC 101 SILO'/'L MIIazI. •atnL zad f=1a 3o zsoprttri a4q BT PaazOdaz arunp raaoM •TwT«•rMHr+•a+•••Hrrr•r•+«••Y•Y«•••••«••rsrarrrrs••rrr•Tr«r••rY••«•••1Yr•1••Y L LS L 6L 6L L SL 5T bT 6 6 L 'OBnH=ILW~H -o -s +a +a -a a a a -a -a -a =gnaw .tq soz >'[L L'>i e'9L fi'LE 6'LE L'LH 0'6E 0'6E 8'05 6'95 6'>5 L'SG =RaA/LatlLAY 00'T 00'T 00'S 00'S 00't 00 _t 00't 00'T 00't 00'T~00'L 00'S =LpvLaa zsc[1 b'E2 L'-E B'9L 6'Lf s'LC L'TS 0'6E 0•fi[ B'OS 6'-5 6:69 L'SL =RaA/dataa 00't 99'T O9'L- 00'T 00't 00'T 00'L 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'L 00'S ~Lpe dvTaa 0'0 0'0 0'0 'D'0 0'0 0'0 0.0 0'0 0'0 0'0 '0'0 0'0 =L+ananOTToL Z'0 9'9 L'Lf E'OT E'OT 6'TT -'9 -'9 5'SL 2'fS L'Et 9'TF =L•QaunszOUI L'EL L'6L 0'-> 5'LL 5'LC b'6f 9'2f 9'ZE E'SE 9'T- 9'S- I'-- +Taa wzO~Fan 90'0 L9'0 29'k LB'0 C9.0 L9'0 Tfl'0 ' Tfl•D Zfl'0 21'D Lfl'0 LB'0 +da,/aulnLoA 5'Lf 5'LC T'OL 9'IC 9'OE C'9T -'6L -'6Z t'SL L'>t L'bt 6'6 +awSS uaaa~ Yra• •sra TTY• •r1• +BiAOw 7Fz9 CO'0 Z2'O fl0'0 LE'0 L£'0 tt'0 -L'0 -L'0 02'0 LT'0 Lt'0 10'0 =a>S/SaA +etnpaW ats.LLsaY .{atOSdsJ 05LT 006T 04LT L9C IE>t 04LT IfiL TD6L OflLi C>L L8>[ OSLT ='a*fl I^aTd 00't 00'T 00'S OL'0 01'0 00'T b-'0 95't 00'T ET'0 ~LB'T 00-t +cavaZ E6'0 00'T L6'0 56"0 56'0 C6'0 56'0 Bfi•0 L6'0 5fi'0 86'0 L6.0 +awwgfALPv 006E 006E OOfiI 006T 006T .006E OOfiS OD6T 006T OOfiL OOfiL OofiT +suwS/afl9 =aLn-aW r+OLd aaTaamafl9 flE Et- 5>T 6ST -5- 6Bt 61L C19 i5E fli ZOb 6Et =-TOA TvaSd 00'T 00't 00'T 90'I 00't 00'T 00'L 00'T 00'L 00'T 00'S 00'T =Lint d=Ai 00'S 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T OD'T DO't 00'L 00'I 00'T 00'T ~Lp1t 9Ad SC Etb 5>t >t2 -56 fflT 61I Lfl9 fi5E flL COb 6[T =LOA paOnpaa Z[T 0 0 9Z 0 0 DL 0 0 OS 0 0 sSOA 70nPat7 L9L £Tb 5-T 0-T 656 6BT 66S L19 65E BL e96 6ET ~awntoA dHd L6'0 C6'0 C6'0 Z6'0 L6'0 Z6'0 L6'0 C6'O L6'0 C6'0 L6'0 26'0 ~ =LpY dHd 90'L 00'S DO'S 00'L 00'L 00'i 00'S 00'T 00'T 00't 00'S QO'T =LPY zaap, >St O/I fFL 62L IT- -LL EIT LE9 0£E CL qLf fl2T +7Ri LvTaTuT 0 0 0 0 9 o D p 9 0 0 0 =IM~Lflz^cssa 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 9 0 0 S D =LOA D'PPY -SL OflC [[t 6LI Itb 4LS CIS 9C9 OCE LG 69£ 9ZT ~af9 SflriTaI 00'T Oo'S 00'L o0't 00'S 00•T o0•T 00'T 00'T 00'L 00'L D9'T +Lw g7aozB -St Oflt EEt 6Lt BT- >LT fBS 9C9 OEE LL 69£ IZT =LOA afl9H ratnpow aimttoA t 0 t 0 Y 0 T 0 0 L D L i D L 0 t T D T ~eaaflz OL 'OL L OS OT L OT OL L OL OT L waaZJ' •IITW apntoul apniov2 ~ apnLOOI spnt~aT +cav6Ta paa~aaou PaaOSaoza Paaaa7ozd Pfl7oa7ozd !SOZaua, I---------------II---------------II-------'-------II---------...._.~...__------- a- a. z a ,- S- z a- z- z a- s- 7 ~aaawanOW panoH Deaq panaH aa'tH punofl Y;noH pvnofl gazoK +Tt~flozddp T••••H•rrr•••••TYTYY•«•r••Tr«rY••••••.••r•r•••••••~rr.•!••w!T••«••r1•••••T•••a a ~aOZnzaS i0 Wnaz TI =aLo~ L>wTadO L'S- ~l4an/oasf A~ITaa aBazanv (aas 0'b•Y+JtI Ct r(oacl amF,S rcaT BTfl'0 =(X)'d9~/•TOA L^OT3Tz~ oat '=(aasl ai~+C7 •••«•«•1•••««Tr•a•w•••«••.au•1+•r•••rr••1r•«rT•r1i•wT1•T rr•r•«MY1•rT••Y•••ar• *nLWtJOii 7 6aFTta78 fig voTyOaszaaIIT T•r••r•a•••!•T!•YTY••rT••••11•+!T•YYY!•YI•lTT1r1••••••••s!r •1•r••••r•!•••T•TYT•4 (anTavuzaaLtl~awALoA amat~l pogaaw 6taFaezada WJH OOOL »odaa ua'{aeandwo~ aOTnzaS 3o ia~+c'I ' T-bT sBed - 6Z+bb=5L LOOL 'LZ da8 nVSWd a0a[ozd + TZtl + BaTastxH - ~-;~ EXHIBIT B _ = ~' ARBOR RE50L~R.CES Prnfessivnal Arboriculturul Cansulti~ig & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE OAKS SHOPPING CENTER 21265 STEVENS CREEK BQULEVARD CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA APPlICANT• Karen Nao, Sand Hill Properties Company APN: 326-27-035 Submitted to: Colin Jung Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA ASCA Registered ConsultingArborist #399 .ISA Certified Arbarist #WE-4001A July 24, 200'7 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • Email: arborresourcesLcomcast.net Phone: 650.654.331 Fax; 650.240.0777 Licensed Contractor #796763 21 -165 David.L. Babby, Registered Consulting,4rborist July 24, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE ~ PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............:............................................. 1 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION ..................................1 3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION ....................... 3 4.0 TREES ALONG WESTERN BOUNDARY ............................ 4 5.0 REVIEW OF TREE IMPACTS ........................................... 4 5.1 Proposed Tree Removals .............................................. 4 5.2 Trees at Potential Risk of Severe Impacts ........................... 5 6.0 RECOMNI)CNDATIONS ................................................... 6 6.1 Design Guidelines .......................................................6 6.2 Protection Measures Before and During Construction ............ 8 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT TITLE A TREE INVENTORY TABLE B .SITE MAP i 21 - 166 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION I have been retained by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department to review the following items associated with a proposal for development of the Oaks Shopping Center located at 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino: [1] the demolition of buildings housing a theater, security office and Royal Tofu Huse, and [2] construction of a new hotel and mixed-use building over a parking podium. Tasks performed for this review are as follows: ^ Identify ail trees on-site. ^ Estimate their trunk diameters at approximately 54 inches above grade or as appropriate to obtain the most representative sample of trunk size. ^ Distinguish between "protected trees" versus not-protected trees ((pursuant to Section 14.I8.035{B) of Cupertino's Municipal Code)). ^ Estimate canopy spread and ascertain the trees' health and.structural integrity. ^ Determine the trees' suitability for preservation (e.g. high, moderate or low). ^ Review the two site plans, Sheets DR-2 and DR-3, by ARC Inc. Architects, dated 5/30/07. ^ Assign numbers to each tree and plot these numbers on the map presented in Exhibit B (this map is a copy of Sheet DR-3, Preliminary Site Plan B}. Tags were found attached to the trunks of nearly half the inventoried trees; when one was found, I note it within the second column of the table in Exhibit A. ^ Prepare a written report containing the aforementioned information, and provide measures to help avoid or mitigate anticipated impacts. 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION There are 119 trees of lb various species inventoried for this report. They are sequentially numbered from 1 thru 119, and the table on the following page identifies their name, number and percentage. Specific data recorded for each tree can be viewed in Exhibit A (Tree ~nveniory Table). 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevarr~ Cupertino ~ Page 1 of I1 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 - 167 Dm~id L. Babby, Registered Consulting flrborist July 24, 2007 NAME FREE NUIVIBER 5 - COUNT' PERCENT OE ~ TQTAL Ash 20, 22, 23, 26, 28, 29, 51, 52, 57-66, 73-78, 95, 107, 108 27 23% Chinese Pistache 79-92, 96-101, 116-149 24 20% Coast Live Oak 2-14, 16, 17, 39, 67, 102, 105, 106, 13-15 23 19% Crape Myrtle 15, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 27, 69 8 7% Evergreen Pear 38, 93, 94 3 3% Eucalyptus 36, 38, 41, 43, 45, 47 6 5% Flowering Pear 111, 112 2 2% Holly Oak 72 1 1 Japanese Maple 1, 103 2 2% Pine 30-35, 37, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48- 50, 53-56, 109, 110 20 17% Pittosporum 70, 104 2 2% Tree-of-Heaven 71 1 1 Tota! 119 100% As indicated above, the site is populated primarily by ash, pistache, oak and pine trees. The following 18 trees are defined as "protected trees" ((per Section 14.18.035(B) of City Code)): #2, 3, 5-8, 10-13, 17, 67, I02, 105,106 and 113-i 15. Each of these is a coast live oak with a trunk diameter larger than 10 inches in diameter. There are 78 trees missing from the plans; they include #1, 4, 9, 14-33, 39, 45, 51, 53-65, 69, 71-102 and 107-112. Their approximate locations aze presented. on the map in Exhibit B but must not be construed as being accurate or surveyed (in several cases, they very rough estimates due to the lack of existing features shown on the plans). 212b5 Stevens Creek Boulevards Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 2 of II 21 - 168 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting,4rborist July 24, 2007 3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION Each tree has been assigned either a "high," "moderate" or "low" suitability for preservation rating as a means to cumulatively measure their physiological health, structural integrity, location, size and specie type. These ratings and applicable tree numbers are presented below; note that the "high" category is comprised of 18 trees {or 15-percent}, the "moderate" category 65 trees {or 55~ercent}, and the "low" category 36 trees (or 30-percent). High: These trees have a high potential of providing long-term contribution to the site, appear in good health, and contain seemingly stable structures. They can be considered the most suitable for retention and protection. ^ This rating applies to the following: #2, 4, 13-16, 1-8, 19, 21, 24, 25, 27, 39, 67, 105, 110, 114 and i 15. Moderate: These trees contribute to the site but not at seemingly significant levels. Typically, their longevity and contribution is less than those of high suitability and more frequent care is needed during their remaining life span. ^ This rating applies to the following: #3, 6, 9, 10, 12, 22, 23, 32-34, 36-38, 41-43, 45-47, 49, 51-57, 59, 62, 66, 68-70, 73, 74, 79-94, 96-101, 103, 104, 106, I07 and i 16-119. Low: These trees -are predisposed to irreparable health problems. and/or structural defects that are expected to worsen regardless of measures employed. In many instances, they are in a poor or declining condition. ^ This rating applies to the following: #1, 5, 7, 8, 11, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 35, 40, 44, 48, 50, 56, 60, 61, 63-65, 71, 72, 75-78, 95, I02, 108, 109 and 111-113. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 3 of 11 21 - 169 Dm~id L. Gabby, Registered Consulting tlrborist July 24, 2007 4.0 TREES ALONG WESTERN BOUNDARY Trees #33 thru 57 form a row of trees along the western property boundary and are comprised predominantly of Monterey pines, eucalyptus and shamel ash. Trees #34 thru 50 overhang the existing parking }ot and are situated within one-foot (many grow against) the existing curb. Trees #51 thru 57 are grouped around and near all existing maintenance shed and trash enclosure. Of these trees, #35, 40, 44, 48 and 50 are either dead ar dying and should be removed regardless of the proposed project. Though certainly not highly-valued due to their short remaining life-span and high maintenance requirements, the others trees appear worthy of retention as they seem vigorous enough to continue serving as an effective screening element between the site and Highway 85. 5.0 REVIEW OF TREE IMPACTS 5.1 Anticipated Tree Removals Based on information presented on the plans, there aze 62 trees {or 52 percent of the total) that will require removal to achieve the proposed design; they include #28-51,.53- 55, 58-63, 65 and 68-95. Of these, #34, 36-39, 41-43, 45-47, 49 and 51-55 are healthy enough to continue serving as an effective screening element between the site and highway. Consequently, their retention is recommended, and in an effort to maintain their longevity, stability and natural form while allowing for construction (including the establishment of scaffolding), I recommend the following nllninaurre building setbacks are incorporated into the design: 10 feet from the trunks of trees #34, 36-39, 41-43, 45-47, 49 (essentially the row of trees along the western boundary fronting the existing parking ' Note that even at 10 feet away, canopy loss is expected for several of the pines, a situation that will create some asymmetry of their canopies; however, the loss is not anticipated to significantly diminish their form. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 4 of l l 21 - 170 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting.4rborist July 24, 2007 lot), and [2] 15 feet from the trunks of trees #51 thru 55. Any excavation, fill or trenching must be restricted to two feet beyond the building footprints, and the future walkway established at least five feet from the existing curb. 5.2 Trees at Potential Risk of Severe Impacts Based on information provided and my estimation of tree locations, there are approximately five additional trees at potential risk of becoming severely impacted through implementation of the proposed plans; they include #52, 56, 64, 66 and 67. Trees #52 and 56 are suggested to be retained due to their screening contribution between the site and highway. To achieve this, I recommend a 15-foot setback from their trunks for any building, excavation, fill or trenching. Tree #64 would sustain a severe amount of root loss and be subjected to instability and premature decline through implementation of the new parking lot configuration around its trunk;. this conclusion applies to both site plan options A and B. When considering this tree's very aggressive root system and a high propensity for large limb failure, its loss would seemingly conform to the City's Municipal Code. Tree #66 may also sustain severe root loss if the existing parking island surrounding its trunk requires horizontal soil cuts. If it is intended to be retained, I recommend the existing curb configuration remains or is expanded to avoid the need for severing large roots. Also, construction of the parking lot within 15 feet of its trunk should not involve excavation below the existing asphalt surface. Tree #67 is at potential risk of root damage and losing a relatively large and significant 10- inch diameter limb growing relatively low and towards the northwest. The root damage can be seemingly mitigated through measures presented in the next section being followed. The limb may or may not conflict with a large vehicle accessing the new parking area; it certainly appears close. As the limb vitally contributes towards the tree's structural form, I recommend the situation is studied by the applicant or their design team to ensure the Iimb can indeed remain (or the plan is modified to achieve this requirement}. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 5 of Il 21-171 Dm~id L. Bobby, Registered Consulting flrborist July 24, 2007 6.0 RECOMMENDATION5 Recommendations presented within this section serve as guidelines for achieving adequate protection of trees that will be retained. They should be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Please note that any or all recommendations are subject to revision upon reviewing any revised plans. 6.1 Design Guidelines I . The location, canopy dimension,Z and vertical elevation of all trees inventoried for this report should be located by a licensed surveyor. 2. All site-related plans (e.g. site, grading and drainage, and landscape) should contain the following: the above-mentioned information; the trunk of each tree, exemplified by a circle to scale; the numbers assigned to each tree; any tag number; and the type of tree (e.g. oak, pine, ash, pistache, etc.). For trees to be removed, an "X" should be shown through their trunks. 3. Amore detailed plan showing existing and proposed conditions should also be created and supplied for review. The Limit of work should also be outlined on the site plans. 4. Recommendations presented in Section 5.0 of this report shall be followed to achieve the protection of trees being retained. 5. The sections of walkway proposed beneath a tree's canopy should be established entirely on top of existing soil grade, including base materials, edging and forms (i.e. a no-dig design). Additionally, direct compaction of the existing soil surface (i.e. subgrade) must be avoided; the subbase materials can be compacted but should not exceed an 85-percent density. Soil fill can be used to sharply bevel the 'top of a walkway to existing grade. s The canopy dimensions shown for trees shown on the site plans reviewed are accurate for some, but smaller than the actual size for most. 2!265 Sterens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 6 of II City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 - 172 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 6. Where beneath a tree's canopy, trenching, excavation or fill shall not occur beyond 24 inches beyond the future building foundations. In no circumstances shall soil cuts be required within sections of existing planters beneath canopies of retained trees (unless reviewed and approved by the City of Cupertino). 7. Table A ~ of Section 14.18.185 of the City Code should be used as the basis for determining the size and amounts of replacement trees to mitigate those approved for removal. The trees must be double-staked with rubber tree ties, and all forms of irrigation shall be of an automatic drip or soaker hose system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. Additionally, to achieve the greatest assurance of proper installation, ~ all new trees shall be installed, including necessary irrigation, by an experienced state-licensed landscape contractor {or a professional tree company) and performed to professional industry standards. . 8. Upon availability, the following plans should be reviewed for tree-related impacts: topographic (showing the trees and information presented in items # 1 and 2); site, grading and drainage; building elevations; and landscaping. 9. This report and any supplemental letters shall be incorporated into the final set of project plans, titled Sheets T-1, T-2, etc. (Tree Protection Instructions), and referenced on all site-related plans (i.e. site plans, grading and drainage plan, and landscape plans). 10. The permanent and temporary drainage design for the project should not require water being discharged beneath the trees' canopies. 1 l .The proposed landscape design should conform to the following guidelines: a. The installation of turf and plant material should be avoided beneath the oak canopies; as an alternative, Isuggest afour-inch layer of coarse wood chips. (decorative ar from a tree company. b. Irrigation beneath oaks can impose adverse impacts and should be avoided: Irrigation must not strike within three feet from the trunks of all other trees. 21263 Stevens Creek Boulevard' Cupertino Page 7 of 11 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 -173 Dm~id L. Babby, Registered Corrsulting.4rborist ~ July 29, 2007 c. Trenching for irrigation or lighting should be avoided beneath the canopies. If necessary; they should be routed in a radial direction to the trunks. d. Stones, mulch and fencing should not be placed against the trunks of existing or new trees. Plastic ground cover should also be avoided beneath canopies. e. Tilling beneath canopies should be avoided, including for weed control. f. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (such as by using vertical stakes}. 6.2 Protection Measures before and during Development 12. Due to the close proximity of activities among trees, a "project arborist"3 should be retained by the applicant or owner to assist in implementing and achieving compliance with ail tree protection measures. 13. Prior to any grading, trenching or site clearing work, apre-construction meeting shall be held on-site with the contractor and project arborist to discuss work procedures, protection fencing locations, limits of grading, staging areas, .routes of access, supplemental watering, mulching, locations for equipment washing, and other tree protection measures. 14. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any grading, trenching or site clearing work, and its precise location must be determined and its placement approved by the project arborist prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permit. It shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link mounted on eight-foot tall, two-inch diameter steel posts that are driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. If installed on hardscape, the chain link fence can be supported by metal or concrete stands. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout construction until final inspectign. 3 The "project arborist" refers to an individual that is certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and/or is a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA). 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 8 of 11 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 - 174 David L. Babb~~, Registered Consulting ilrborist July 24, 2007 15. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas {even after fencing is removed) and off unpaved areas beneath the canopies of Ordinance-size trees inventoried and not inventoried for this report. These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, stripping of topsoil, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipment/vehicleoperotion and parking. 16. Any approved digging or trenching beneath a canopy shall be manually performed. In the event roots of two inches and greater are encountered during the process, the project arborist shall be consulted for appropriate action. 17. Removal of the existing parking lot and curb/gutter must be carefully performed to avoid excavating soil and roots during the process. Any tractor used during the process must work remain on hardscape at all times and off exposed soil and roots. In the event significant roots (e.g. two inches and greater in diameter)' are found to have exploited base rock beneath the existing asphalt, the roots should be left intact and the base material used for the new parking lot. 18. Prior to grading or excavating soil beyond 10 feet from a tree's canopy, aone-foot wide trench should be manually dug along the perimeter of a foundation for the entire distance. The trench should be dug to at Ieast three feet below grade or the required depth, whichever is greater, and shall occur where excavation will occur closest to the trunk. Any roots encountered during the process should be cleanly severed against the soil cut. Roots with diameters of two inches and greater should be treated according to the project arborist. 19. Overcut~should not exceed a distance of 18 to 24 inches from a foundation or utility trench 20. Prior to construction, Irecommend afour-inch layer of coarse wood chips ('/,- to 3/.- inch in size) is manually spread on unpaved soil beneath the trees' canopies. These 212b5 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 9 of 11 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 -175 Dm~id L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 chips must not be placed against the trees' trunk, should remain throughout construction, and can be obtained from a tree service company and/or by contacting www. reusertnc. com. 21. Any approved activity required beneath a tree's canopy (within and beyond the designated fenced areas) must be performed under direction of the project arborist. 22. All existing, unused lines or pipes beneath the canopies of retained trees should be abandoned and cut off at existing soil grade. 23. Each recommendation that is presented within Section E.1 of this report and is applicable to the actual development of the site shall be followed. 24. Throughout development, supplemental water must be supplied to the retained trees; the project arborist shall determine the specific trees, intervals, amounts and application methods. 25. The pruning and removal of trees shall be performed per the project arborist's scope of work and under the supervision of an individual certified by the ISA (and not performed by constrcuction personnel). Any tree stumps being removed beneath or near canopies of retained trees should be ground below grade rather than pulled up with an excavator. All approved tree removals should be marked with paint (such as by an "X") prior to being removed. 26. All equipment shall be positioned to avoid the trunks and branches of trees. Where a conflict arises, the project arborist must be contacted to help address the situation. 27. All ivy should be removed off and at least two feet from the trees' trunks. This work should be manually performed. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino Page 10 of II City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 -176 David L. Babby, Registered Co~rsultingArborist July 24, 2007 28. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Herbicides should not be used beneath the trees' canopies; where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. ~~~~ Date: Jul 24 2007 Prepared By: y David L. Babby, R -r ~ °~ r ~A 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevarcly Cupertino City of Cupertino Co»tmunity Development Department Page 11 of l l 21 - 177 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 EXHIBIT A: TREE INVENTORY TABLE 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevm•d, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department 21 - 178 TREE IN\iENTQRY TABLE d ~ . o o ~ ~~o'a ° a n+ °~ fin. a~ ~`' '. a ° ~ 'ai , _ ad- ^ ~ ~ ~ ~`v,. ~ ~ _ . ~ 'QO - ... s c .b ~ . ~ ~" ~ n i , . , ~ . : ' o ~ m : TREE =TAG . _ ~ ~ , ~ _.a ,~ . - ~' ~ '~ ~ ~ x: . Q a.. , - o-. - n_ . i~TO. - NO u TREE JJAdv1E ,-, C~ 1 183 Japanese Maple (Ater palmatum) 8, 6, 4 15 25 50% SQ% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: Branch dieback and significant trunk damage. 2 8 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 19 40 35 75% 100% Good High 5 - X Comments: Minor tip dieback. 3 108 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a ifolia) 14 20 20 50% 75% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Decline in canopy. 4 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 4 15 10 100% 75% Good Hi 5 - X Comments: Crowded growing conditions. Planted beneath tree #5 and should be relocated somewhere else so its cano y can achieve a full and symmetrical form. 5 l Coast Live Oak ( rcus a rifolia) 46 35 60 50% 25%" Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Significant cavities and decay throughout trunk and limbs. 6 Coast Live Oak (Ouercus agrifolia) 37 ~ 45 65 50% 50% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Four cables are within canopy. There is a cavity at about eight feet high on east side. 7 102 Coast Live Oak (t?uercus agrifolia } 39 40 40 25% 50% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Significant dieback throughout canopy. Tree in .decline. There is a large wound at the lower trunk's east side. One cable is within cano 8 3 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 42 40 45 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Four cable within canopy. Large wounds along west side. 9 4 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agri oliq) 7.5 15 ]0 50% 100% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. 10 9 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 31.5 30 30 50% 50% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse foliage. Two cables in canopy. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Svulevard, Cupertino Prepared for City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Deparf. Prepared by: David L. Sabby, RCA 7 of 12 Julyz7,l4, ?l0~ TREE INVENTORY TABLE y . of . .' ~ .t~-'~ ..: j' J' G. ~` ' ` w N' ~ _ ~ -~ O ~. ._ (~ O .. ~ r ' ~ `~ T ~.. - . x '3 ~ . . U _ 4 -. , _ Ate, b °(~~ .G] _f 1 ;~ ~ ~~ c ~ ~, ~' ' ~ ~ ~_ . :: ~ ~ .'T'REE. TAG _ . Y ~ ~ ' ;~~. ~. ~ ~,.o ~._g ~, o . , ~ , ~.. _ . ~ ~ •. R a. o - o NtD NO ' AME _ TREE aV ~ - - ~, e. ~ ~ ~ :,.~° . ~ •, - _ as. .. . . , vast t,~ve vax 11 (Ouercus a ifolia) 29.5 35 30 25% 50% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. , Coast Live Oak 12 18 (Quereus agri olia) 14 20 20 50% 50% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. Coast Live Oak 13 17 (Quercus a ifolia) 14.5 25 30 75% 100% Good High 5 - X Comments: 14 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrfolia) 3 8 7 100% 100% Good 'High 5 - X Comments: 15 Crape Myrtle {La erstroemia indica) 7.5 10 10 75% 100% Good High 5 - X Comments: ' 16 Coast Live Oak (Duercus a ifolia) 4 10 8 100% 75% Good 11igh 5 - X Comments: New install. 17 86 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a ifolia) 39.5 35 35 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X X Comments: There is a large cavity along the southwest side. 18 Crape Myrtle (La erstroemia indica 2.5 ] 5 S 75% 100% Good Hi 5 - X Comments: 19 Crape Myrtle (La erstroemia indica) 3.5 15 8 75% 100% Good Hi 5 - X Comments: . 20 87 Shamel Ash (Frazinus uhdei) 17 30 40 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Poor attachment and decay. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevaral, Cupertino Prepared fnr. City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David L. Sabby, RCA 2 of 12 July1~4, 20J17 T~EB iN~i/ENTO~Y TQ-BLB -..... .. ~ . . _ . y "Q.. ~ - a Y .. V ~~ 6 ~~ ~ Tl~ 3'AG : : ~" . _ : " .: ,v ~ :; ` ~ . ~--~, ` ~ ~ ~a o ,~ ~ -~ "o - ; ~ `° • - •~ • ~ q o- . - w c . z . 2N0.. ° NO. `. '•-.. _".3'R~EI~AME"•: F., _e7-; c~... ~ ur. .-u -x_C;• ,•rii'..;_• -..O .. - :•.~cn• . ::..,~ ~. . ~.,.. . - 21 grape ivryrne (Lagerstroemia indices } 3 5 I S I O 75% 75% Good High 5 - X Comments: Planted to deep (Iike other two crape myrtles). 22 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 23.5 45 45 100% 50% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 23 Shamel Ash {Fresxinus uhdei) 24 40 35 I00% 50% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 24 Crape Myrtle (l.agerstroemia indices) 4 l5 ]0 75% 75% Good High 5 - X Comments: • Crape Myrtle 25 {I.agerstroen:ia indices) 3 10 8 75% 75~/o Good Hi h 5 - X Comments: Shamel Ash ~ (Fraxinus uhdei) 22.5 50 35 50% 50% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: 27 Crape Myrtle (Lagerstroemia indices } 3 IO 8 75% 75% Good High 5 - X Comments: 28 91 Shamel Ash (Fraxinusuhdei) 27 50 60 75% 5(1% Fair Low - X X Comments: Has damaged adjacent hardscape. 24 92 Shame) Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 24 •40 40 75% 25% Fair Low - X X Comments: Cavity along lower trunk. Monterey Pine 30 58 Pinus radiates 18.5 30 30 25% 50% Poor Low - X X . Comments: Tree is dying. Beetle attacks observed Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for. City of Cupertino Comm. Aevelop. Depart. Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA 3 of 12 Ju~t24y 0107 TREE tl~\fER{TORY TALE CL m - ~-. - ~ ~_~ ~ - ' o ~ ` . 'y ~' r~ ... . 0 , 0 .. ~ ~\ rte y - . . ~ .- ..... ~. ~~ Q ~ ~ o ~\ _ - o o _: ~ . ~ - ~ _ ~, ~ _ _ _ . ~ ~-d c N - ~ o ~ U ~ ~ ~ o o . . . .. .u ~, .TREE TAG _ .°i ~. o ~.:°o .. ~ ~ _`° oo N p p a _' ... -O T1tEENANIE rn. . `x:°^, vi.^ - .`,O°... ~ x... - • 31 57 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates) 14 20 20 25% 75% Poor Low - X X Comments: Tree is dying. 32 S6 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates) 23.5 35 - 35 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: Sparse canopy. 33 55 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates) ] 7.5 30 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 34 54 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates) 22 25 35 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X • Comments: 35 53 Monterey Pine (Pimps radiates) 23 30 30 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments: Tree is dSring. Beet}e attacks observed 36 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Fecal tus nicholii) 13.5 25 20 100% 75% Good Moderate. - X Comments: 37 Aleppo dine } I (Pines hales ensis 14.5 1 15 I 20 75 /0 I I 75 /o I Good I Moderate I - I X I I _~ Comments: 38 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Eucaly ter nicholii) 12.5 20 20 100% 50% Good Moderate - X Comments: 39 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a ifolia) 7 i2 15 100% 75% Good Hi - X X Comments: Jvy covering truiilc. 40 49 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates) 12 10 20 50% 75% Fair Low - X Comments: Short tree with low-branching architecture. Tree is situated within island of parking lot (see map for its estimated location}. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. p4 pp T Prepared by: David L. Gabby, RCA 4 of J2 JuIY 27' 2182 Ti REE IiV~iEN i Cfi~c~f Ti ~+BLE _ - _ ~ ~ n_ 0.. '. ~ ~ •r~ y b - - .. ~ ~ L' - . d.' 0.. ' w ~ i. ~ ld ~ ~' 3 3 . .. . - ~ ~ ' n 'd. ~ m' ~ ~ ~ 'B .CQ U ~ t,' ~~~cccorrr w .. ' ~o ' a~ .TREE ,TAG ~o ~~ ~ i~~.-. ~ ~;:w ~ + ~y '~.1 ~,~ a .o ~ O f~ - ~, ~. _ ~ ~ ~:. ~ ~ . g, Q D ~ , p ,~. r~ ;. :. :NO N0 - TRE)r~]AI~IE -" Vl - VJ r S. i ~ ~~ n ` ~ z:-` , . . . Willow-Leafed Peppermint 4I (Eucal tus nicholii) 13.5 20 20 100% 50% Good Moderate - X Comments: f 42 ~ 47 ~ (Pinus radiates) ~ 15.5 E ] 5 ~ 20 ~ 75% ~ 50% ~ Fair ~ Moderate ~ - ~ X ~ ~ ~ Comments: 43 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Eucaly tus nicholii) ]4 30 20 100% 75% Good Moderate - X Comments: 44 45 Monterey Pine (Pim~.r radiates) 20 30 30 0% Q% Dead Low - X Comments: Tree is dead. 45 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Eucalyptus nicholii) ]6 20 20 100% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments: . 46 42 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates) 17 20 20 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X Comments: Tree is declining. 47 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Eucaly tus nicholii) 17.5 25 25 100% 2S% Fair Moderate - X Comments: Weak attachment between two Ieaders. 48 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates 20.5 30 35 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments: Has declined severely as 60-percent of canopy is dead Has significantly been attacked by bark beetles. 49 39 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates) 22.5 25 30 75% 75% Good Moderate - X Comments: 50 38 Monterey Pine (Pines radiates } 20.5 35 30 25% 75% Poor Low - X Comments: Tree is dying. . Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L Babby, RCA 5 of 12 July~4,.af~7 TREE IN~fENTORY TA~~E .. ~.~ _ _ ~ .^ , . p _ . , _. . y .~ ^.. p p ~ 3 y y ~ 3 ~ ~ ~~- OD ~ - .TREE. TAG _ . •o ~' - ~ ~ ~ ._ -iVO. : _ "• X10. - - g7tEE NAME ~ ~.. ~ ,~~ .• ui.. .:-vt r;"i_ : X,.p. _•~..~. , .O ~. :- v i-~-.- .° :.:• ~'n` ,-: . a".. ~ Shamel Ash I I I I ° I ° ~ I - ~ I ' 5I 37 (Fraxinus uhdei) 2 ] 45 35 50% 50 /o Fair Ivloderate X X Comments: Shamel Ash 52 (Fraxinus uhdei) -16.5 45 30 75% 25% Fair Moderate 1 - Comments:Tree is situated behind fence. Monterey Pine 53 I36 (Pirtus radiata) 23 40 40 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 54 I 83 Monterey Pine I (Pines radiata) I 19 ( 30 I 30 ° ~ 50 /0 ° ~ 75 /° I Fair I Moderate - l I X X Comments: 55 184 Monterey Pine (Pines radiata) 21 25 30 SO% 50% Fav Moderate - X X Comments: 56 ] 85 Monterey Pine (Pines radiata 15 35 25 75% 75% Good Moderate 1 - X Comments: ' 57 ] 86 Raywood Ash {Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 12.5 25 30 75% SQ% Fair Moderate 3 - X " Comments: g8 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) _ 4 20 15 75% 25% Fair Low - X X Comments: This tree is a volunteer, Diameter reflects measurement at base of its trunk. 59 137 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 17.5 45 40 100% 50% Good Moderate - X X Comments: Adjacent to maintenance shed. 60 138 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 16 40 30 100% 25% Fair l.ow - X X Comments: Has a large girdling root and poor structure. Is adjacent to maintenance shed. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L Babby, RCA 6 of 12 JulY2~-~ ~~~~ ~{~~~~~~~~ ~i Qg~€ -ii". ~ O D ~ ~ ~ ^ y . _~ ~ a~. - .-~. - - t1 F• 4r - ~ '. O'x .. O ..d h ti"-y C.. , ~..4a ~ w .0.. ~, . TRF.1 TAG ~ ~ '~ v ~ .BF- _?~ =~3.0 -o .~ iu $ ...~ °° ~ .~ . R o - o, . . 7`i0;. NO. , ~ . ~ - TREE NAIv1E ..: . EH C7 +' .. c~ ~ w r°' .a, .~ ;x , ~,o O•~ ~ _~ . , . ,° ,N,- -,~. n, a~: , Z-_- 61 l39 Shamel Ash ~ (Fraxinus uhdei) ~ 13 5 I 30 I 25 ° i 100 /o I ° ( 25 /o ~ Faa~ f Low y - ( ! ~ X I I X Comments: Has sustained severe root damage. Its canopy is highly asymmetrical canopy and grows in crowded conditions. Is ad'acent to maintenance shed. 62 35 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 24.5 50 50 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: Causing hardscape damage. 63 Shame] Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 25 35 40 50% SD% Fair Low - X X Comments: Branch dieback • 64 31 Shamel Ash (Fraxinars uhdei) 22:5 35 35 75% 50% Fair Low 1 - X Comments: 65 30 Shame] Ash {Fraxinusuhdei) 18 .45 25 50% 25% Poor Low - X X Comments: Branch dieback 66 Shame] Ash (Fraximes uhdei } 28.5 55 55 I00% 25% Fair Moderate 1 * - Comments: Ifparking island is reconfigured to require any soil cuts or excavation; otherwise it is a "3." 67 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 20.5, 15 35 50 75% 75% Good High 1 * - X Comments; Iflow-growing, northwest limb requires removal; otherwise. it is a "2." 68 Evergreen Pear . (Pyrus kawakan:ii) 14.5, l I 25 55 100% 50% Good Moderate - X Comments: Grows in a raised planter. 69 Crape Myrtle ~ (L.agerstroemia indica } 4.5(5), 2.5 20 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments; 70 ~ ~ (Pittosporum eugenioides)_ ~ 8 8 6 I 25 ~ 30 ~ 75% ~ 50% ~ Fair ~ Moderate ~ - ~ X Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Soufevarol, Cupertino _ Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Deparf. Prepared by: David L. Sabby, RCA 7 of 12 Juty 24, 200 21 - 185 Ti i~EE iFi~v'EF~i~i QR i i ABLE _ ~ . ~. .. _ a~ ~ ~ . ~.. . _ _ .. Aw°_ ~~ U .Ib I _ ~ ~ N y~, TRE$ SAG _ ~ • . _ ' < b . '~ :., - ~ '- T. ~ o °-o ~' o f° no ~ x _Ca $:; ~' ~ ' ~ ., - ' . ~Tt7: N© , , • 3'REL NAME - , •L~ C7 w'.• . w; ar . x : 07 ° C7 O• ...., ...: m ~ ..: `. ~-. ~< ~ ,..., s o-, z.- > 7] 1 ree-or-rieaven) I (Ailanthus altissima v, 4, ~' ( 2 2 I 20 I I5 o f 100 /0 I 25 /o I Fair I Low - X X Comments: 72 133. Holly Oak (Quartos ilex) 13.5 30 30 75% 50% Fav Low - X X Comments: Wound along lower trunk. 73 I72 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 19 35 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 74 Shamel Ash {FrcDCinusuhdei} 18 30 30 75% ' SQ% Fair Moderate - X X Commens: 75 171 Shamel Ash (Fraxim~rs uhdei) 14.5 25 25 25% 50% Poor Low - X X Comments: Significant dieback. 76 7l Shamel Ash (Fraximrs uhdei) 14.5 20 20 50% 50% Fair Low - X X Comments: , 77 132 Shamel Ash (Frcuinus uhdei) l9 40 30 25% 50% Poor Low - X X Comments: 78 32 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 11 20 20 75% 50% Fair. Low - X X Comments: 79 68 Chinese Pistache {Pistacia chinensis 4.5 10 l0 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 80 69 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis } 6 15 20 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for. City of Cuper'tfno Comm. Develop. Depart , Prepared by: David L. Gabby, RCA 8 of i2 Juty ~~, 2(~g~ TnEE 1P~iVEt~~'~F~Y TRBLE -~ ~ ~ :, ~ o - .. ~ a ~,. ~- ~,~ . o ~ ~ 4 `z ~~ cd ~ ~ s . ~. (° _ i n ~ y V.I y..• ~7 ~ L A w ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ w _ ~c ~ . y j n ~ 'ono - ...TREE ... TAG .. •.. .- .. ~ :~ _ • E~.~ N n ~ Q o ~ o ~~ ~ q o - , ~j N0: NO. TR.EENA]V1E ~.~~ ~~. . rr . ii ~ ~I+M.~ 1-x-1 1"~.~~~/. r~ V .QA~-J':. ~.~~.. :F-1 ~./ Nt. ~rll _ - ~ H.•. . 81 t;nmese risracne) ~ (Pistacia chinensis ~ 8 5 ]5 I 25 ° I 100% o 100% ~ Good ~ Moderate - ~ ~ X I I X Comments: 82 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 8 15 20 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: g3 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis } 7.5 1S 25 I00% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 84 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 7 10 20 75% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 85 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 4 IO 10 l00% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 8b 164 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 4.5 ] 0 l0 75% 7S% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 87 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 6 10 I S 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: gg Chi~se Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 6 ] 0 20 50% 100% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 89 62 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 7.5 15 20 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 90 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 7 1 O 20 l00% SO% Good Moderate - X X Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David t. Gabby, RCA 9 of 12 July Z4, 2007 21 - 187 Ti i~EE iiV\fEi~i i firiY i iaB~E l~ T..~y +~~ ,. _ 1[Vi _ - V _ . . . ~ ~ ~ _ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C .t R ... ~ - ... , .. . A w `fib ~ . ~ ~. ,. {,. .~ 3 ~ p~ ~ ~ N o ~ ~ .. .. TREE.. . .. . TAG . _ _ .. .: `. . ., . ~ '~ ;,7 . a`~ ~ u~ 0 U , 7 g ~ .. _ R > ° y„ ~ . ~ y GU ~ a_ e .. - o rn o NO. - NO, • : YREE NA1V1E -. • t-~ ~C~ . v`3 . :°u3, rn . '..x ~. • .: ° rn •~ - . -. pa ~ . •-v~i ~ _°. . » ~ ~ .. ~ a w . . : ~ .. 91 Chinese Pistache) (Pistacia chinensis I 5.5 ~ 10 I I 20 o f 100% ° ~ 75 /° ~ Good I Moderate - X X Comments: ' 92 Chinese Pistache {Pistacia chinensis) 5.5 15 20 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X X Comments; 93 173 Evergreen Pear (Pyres kawakamii) 11.5 20 25 100% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 94 Evergreen Pear (Pyres kawakamii) 8.5 15 20 100% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 95 74 Shame) Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 20.5 35 35 50% 50% Fair Low - X X Comments: 96 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis 5.5 15 20 . 100% 75% Good Moderate 3 - X Comments.: 97 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 6.5 IS 25 100% 7S% Good -Moderate S - X Comments: • 98 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 6 15 20 10(1% 100% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 99 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 8 15 30 100% SO% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 100 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis 4.5 10 20 l00% 75% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Greek Boulevaraf, Cupertino Prepared for: Cfty of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L. Gabby, RCA 10 of 12 July2?4, ?t~7 ~~~~ i~v~~~a~~ s~e~~ _ . 4 ti, ~ ,.~ ji ~ .-. N X ~ 5 o °• °~° o ° -~.ns+ fib. . _ Y-~ ~ ` oo• * ' ' _ . ~ Q . ° o ~ ~ ` ~ `' ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ., ~ p ~ H ~ o ~ ' yp;; - , r . . ,^ .. F. y ~ ,~ _ C w. .p . ., ~ ~ .. m t A " ~ • m' ~ ~- ~ ~..'6 .~ orb ~' ~ ~ ~ y ~- ~ ~ . ~ -: . TRE); TAG - .. ' . w ~ ~: £ - ~.',~ ~. o ° 'o - •~ o . ..~ on - ~ ~ _ - q ~.. - o .. N~, T1O. _ .`I'R£); N.AME ., ~ t-7- u`~ _'W vs -x ..... . ra ~. . O' _..... m . ..:. ~ 'a. _ _ .: z . 101 Chinese Pistache {Pislacia chinensis) 5 15 25 100% 75% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 102 Coast Live Oak {Quercus agrtfolio) 28 30 50 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X X Comments; Cavities throughout tree, sparse foliage. 103 84 Japanese Maple (Ater almatum) 7, 6.5, 5.5 25 30 100% 50% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: 104 83 Pittosporum (Pittospor•un: eu enioides) 12 15 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate 5 - Comments: , 105 Coast Live Oak ( uercus a ifolia) 49 45 80 75% 50% Fair High 5 - X Comments: Has about six cables in canopy, 106 20 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a ifolia) 13 l5 25 50% 75°/u Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. I07 23 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 26 45 60 I DO% 50% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 108 I 22 ~ (Fraxinus uhdei) I 20 ~ 40 ~ 40 ( 75% ~ 25% ~ Fair ~ Low j 5 ~ - ~ ~ X _~ Comments: Monterey Pine 109 21 {Pines radiata) 20 35 30 75% 50% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: Canary Island Pine 110 (Pirxus canariensis) 2.5 10 60 100% 100% Good High 5 - X Comments: New install. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for. City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA li of 12 Juiy~,_Z~' TREE iN`JEP~f T CRY TABLE - ~ - - _ ~. -,y ,Q b ftE~ T TAG . _ . •: :n - ~ • .~ .~ ~- ° -° :° ~ °o `- `~ w x : A ~• ,° z- :~. . NO: ~h10. - ' TREB?~IA~IE - ~ . - `" - . F~.. - . ~ .. W'. •- w. -u`~.rn o -. "' ~ .. `.~.... o ~ ~.-, to . C7 O .1 _ _ - ~ '~.. . - v:.. . G ::.-. ...... ~ ~,_ a:. w.. . ~ o Z. ,. 111 93 -- Flowering Pear (Pyr•us calleryana) I 14 I 25 I I 25 ° 100 /0 ~) 25 /0 1 ~ Fair ~ Low I 5 - X _ Comments: Excessive limb weight over road; branch/limb failure will be a subsequent result unless pruning occurred: 112 Flowering Pear (Pyres calleryana) 14 20 25 100% 2S% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: 113 Coast Live Oak (Ouercus a ifolia) 49 35 60 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: 71~ere is a large cavity along lower trunk and various other locations within canopy. External signs of internal deca was also observed. 114 Coast Live Oak (Ouercus agrifolia) 13.5 20 25 100% 50% Gaod Hi h 5 - X Comments: l 15 10 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a rifolia) ] 7.5 25 30 100% 75% Good High 5 - X Comments: 116 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 6.5 15 20 lOQ% 50% Good Moderate S - Comments: 117 13 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 6.5 ] 5 20 100% 75% Good Moderate 5 - . Comments: . 118 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis } 6.5 15 25 l00% 75%' Good Moderate 5 - Comments: 119 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 5.5 ' 15 20 75% 100% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: Site: 29265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: IJavid L Babby, RCA 92 of 92 July 24, 2007 21 - 190 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 EXHIBIT B: SITE MAP 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Depcu~tment 21 - 191 21265 STEVENS GREEK BOULEVARD, CUPERTINO Exhibit C Colin Jung • From: 8eth~Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Thursday, May 0'I, 2008 9:08 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: Oaks Shopping Center Project for your file... -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Griffin [mailto:grenna5000@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:23 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Cc: 4giefer@sbcglobai.net; grenna5000@yahoo.com Subject: Oaks Shopping Center Project Dear Planning Department: I see that plans for the Oaks Shopping Center have been submitted, and are being heard at the Environmental Review Committee today, April 30, 2008, at 4:30 PM. I am very concerned about the number of trees being removed on the property and the density of the buildings being built in the western portion of the shopping center. While the idea of having a business center at the Oaks is very nice, the sheer size of the two buildings being proposed seems just to be too much for the shopping center. The hotel is very massive and has little articulation. Also, having the two buildings set only 15 feet from the Highway 85 soundwall projects an image of a.solid, high-density multi-story facade along the freeways. The Oaks is a beautiful shopping center with Lush vegetation and plantings and the overall size and density of these buildings doesn't match that tranquil atmosphere. I am also worried about the effect on parking and traffic in the Shopping Center and on the surrounding streets and major intersections of Mary and Stevens Creek Blvd. and Highway 85 and Stevens Creek Blvd. Also, the impact on stuent traffic from the De Anza campus and exit at Stevens Creek and Highway 85 is of major concern.. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Jennifer Griffin contr 21 - 193 5/22/2008 Page 1 of 1 Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, May 19, 20D8 5:34 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: The Oaks Shopping Center (Karen Ngo) for your file.... -----Original Message----- From: Ray Garland [mailto:ray.garland@mail.com] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2008 11:23 AM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: The Oaks. Shopping Center (Karen Ngo) Gentlemen, As a long-time Cupertino resident, I wish to voice my support of this application. Since the theater went dark this has been an eyesore and underused property. I believe the plans as outlined in the Notice of Public Hearing would be an attractive benefit to the city and its residents. Raymond L. Garland 21890 Meadowview Lane Cupertino,CA 95014 4D8-255-6916 21 - 194 5/22/2008 EXHIBIT B ~ 1. Colin Jung From: Larry Cannon [cdgplan@pacbell.netJ Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:36 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: Steve Piasecki Subject: Man'iott Residence Inn Colin I looked at a numbex of approaches, and finally settled on the- most simple, straight forward on. First, I went to the Marriott Residence Inn web site to see what styles they have built in California. There is just about every style one might want to consider. Most are the ones that seemed to approach the building as a "home away from home" with a very strong traditional residential character with wood siding -and steep pitched roofs. I only found one example of the new prototype (San Diego Oceanside}, but there were a couple of other interesting ones -these are shown on one of the attachments. My impression of the new prototype is that the entry lobby structure is interesting, but that the main building is not much different from, or better than, the normal mid-range motox hotel. The main "tower" behind the lobby looked especially lacking in interest. The suggested changes include the following: 1. Use clay tiles to match the shopping center on all roofs (I believe you said that the applicant has already agreed to this). 2. Extend the roof overhangs on alI sides of all roofs and treat with the brackets shown on the upper roof element at the lobby. Currently, they seem to be limited to a few places facing the front of the structure.. Adding some richness and detail at the roof overhangs will help, I think. 3. Adding balconies or grilles at some of the windows - balconies.would be best. If just grilles are used, they need to have some dimensional projection from the face of the wall. I note that the prototype photo looks like it has some window grilles, but they are just filled in almost flush with the window, which is not sufficient to have any significant impact. (This approach was taken on the Cypress Hotel). The San Diego Downtown Residence.Inn has some slightly projecting grilles. 4. Adding some awnings.on the structure (This approach was also taken on the Cypress Hotel}. The awnings and the balconies above should be carried around all sides of the structure, not just placed on the front elevation. They will help add visual interest to the freeway side and will assist in screening the windows from the west sun exposure. . 5. Carry the brick base of the lobby building around on all sides of the main building. 6. Intensify the color a hit on the stucco at the-base portion of the building. Please don't take any colors that you see on these diagrams literally. They are quite different on both my monitor and my printer, so what they look Like on your equipment is anyone's guess. 7. Push the windows back from the wall face as much as possible. That helped a lot at the Cypress Hotel, and should be easier here given the window trim proposed. I also studied the use of wood siding on the top floor (often a technique to reduce visual height, add 21 - 195 6/4/2008 Page 2 of 2 interest at the top of buildings, and establish a stronger residential image}, but decided it was too much. Go to the links listed below to download the pdf files. Let me know if you need anything further. I should be in the office all day on Monday. Larry http:!/www.mediafire.com/?tlr vi0 d5h httn://www.mediafire. com/?snvv~lu 1 nibm~ htt~:/lwww.medi.afire. com/?vt9~lXbq~ http : //www.n~ediafire. com/?mh2 smlxl gmb 21 - 196 5/4/2008 Balcony /Grille Examples Marriott Residence inn Cupertino CANNON DESIGN GROUP May 30, 2008 co V Add awnings and balcony/grilles Balconies need to project to be effective Set windows as deeply from wall surface as possible •~ ~• l ~~II ~u~' N tD Darker base color Achitectural Enhancements Marriott Residence Inn Cuper#ino CANNON DESIGN GROUP May 30, 2008 Use clay the to match shopping center on all roofs A & B: Use extended eave with brackets at all roofs San Diego Oceanside New Prototype San Diego Downtown Nofe awnings and balconies Marriott Residential Inn Examples Marriott Residence Inn Cupertino N 'CANNON DESIGN GROUP M~ 30, 2008 Los Angeles Westlake Village Note windows and brackets at bay popout Achitectural Enhancements Marriott Residence inn Cupertino CANNON QESlGN GROUP May 30, 2008 N _ °.r: - : ~, ~ r ....,~; :~; ., - :- ter. `,,. f. ~- .._ _ ~'~._ _ t~~hrr4 ~tti t' _ .: • --. '~ ~~.• : ~ ~. . ~.~ ' ~~ ~ ~: ~cst~~of ~~~crt~.-. Exhibit G - ~ . 10300 Torre Avenve - ~ - - .. - -'~ •Cupcrtir+o. Git{lornh 95015 Cupcr~lno; Cattlornii 95054 - ~ - ~, ~'..~: .. ~ _ - ~ ~ - - _ ` ~ . ~ 7claphpnei (40Q)15Z=4505 .. - - - - .. - .. .~.i~'. u'• r.- orr~ceof'`+~f+ctYY G~.~Rx ~iu~t 7, 1986 R7~e Skanesan l~v~loprt~ti~ Corp. ~ ~ - - - a150 201~t Averlua _ . San Francisco, ~ 95132 .. C.Ci'X GW2dCIL RCT`ION ., 20~~U-Bb _ . 'IZii~ Evil].. canfirnt i]'te 1cL-iotl< b~'. the City Cauttcil- at their tnEeting a~ Ju1y 21, 198G a~ ~rf'tirh y~r •~p~,icat~.ott 20. U-f16 Frae apprrlvect p~':,L•hs . col lc:rrring cc~nr~itions : ~ , ~ c ~~s or ~~oy~,i~rr~x.~n~t~ a ~ ; ~ gr D~.~~~ai . - 1. AiPF'k~7VF.D h~a[IBx'I5 ~ - ~ ~ ~ . - ~ . 7:fie ir~n~~tion t~~ ag~t`r~va-'1• i.s b~se~ on Ex~iibits A, A~-l, ~A:2 ~ . . atxl znto. o~ 1~1~•cm~•i~ri 20-U-AG except. a~ may }~ arr~rx7e~ key : . . specitil. con33.tivns.:x~urnera'r.~ ttar©in. ~ ~ - - -_~ - - '~~t~ rt~licant/c~rrners sYtal]. ras~xip~ thct ~x~rkitx,~ aia~c~s ~o .. ~~o . ~,rsczease p,ttix}citx~ ~tielri t~ A~~coicirnz+~a7.y.>~3~-pa~kl.zx,~~ ca~.s. _ • ~rest~: ~ p~ rl~in ba ~~}a ject tai e~ ~ t ~~vi~w. atxl 'ap}a~vvA]. arid. s1~~.~. joe appra4-~.~ a~ ingil.t•~i~~ 5K~rxlpi~Spex' orel7y~Mayo19n~7, l: Gccupancy I~ertnit tox~ th . ~nfi.i.c'h~vor accurF, P i.~~t. ~ . ' ~ - ~~ ti1~,t~RiC~111: COL"' ~ . Ntau~ ciP a~~aL•iott t~al~ lx~ X.iml.~.~ ttvttt G t~,m. - retriil• shopa, as~1.6tQ0 A.M~ ~°~2t~b0 a.m. PQ~• x;e~taurants. ~ .. 'Sit-down", ~-erau>:~ui~ wit~ttist ~1~e c~ntca>! axia ~x~m1.t~+E3d.a- .ts~~xixca~m o~ Z0, 4Q0 ec~, ~~:. arxZ .a mt~.inr~u~ vfi ~oQ i:r~~l ~~,;ksi. R ttt3.rtU~ . - ,nd;~ustmcn~ in x•o~tut~~nt ~1i~a 1:u-y k~ci'~.~a,:tni.tt~xt t~iteat it i~ ~~~~ ~ . ~3~mcm.~~ratc~cl E;tu~~ the ~t;~~l. ~ia t~t• ~a~tryc; _ . ado ck~cing, entezta~it~ iir l~va'smtsi~ ~is~ ~x~t~m~..tf~, ~ ?~~ ~ . .- .. • .. . ~ l~sraarant~.r~t:~-t~t-ii.tt~. tat:-~t)a ~c~gr+~~ 6ar~~psr.htU.ld~:~3 ~ Y _ - r.~ap~i.f)uQ, t•,Q' hava; ~ ~ai~,t~ ~k~~~~a~.l'i,tY':nayt,.'~,t~~j,:~. t~. {.,_.y' .:,~.:; ::~ :~~. -•..~ -;.: pj~ ~,j~~7~y ~,[ ~f^j~~! ~,,..lgj' th.`C51s t, g~y~Y ~j'~ JP~"~ yyy;]y' Mj`, ~n~° . - - .'~!.'9l~'.e'!.3~i!~~~~:~i3~~M~f)~Ie~:.tii4F•9~.~1~~~i}t~'1~'~t'1`'~w..J'iT.iG?/t'~~~LN.~~~CY~+~9.~'~~LY{•1~~~' • ... .. ~: -; - -- -__ ---- a±C ~f- •~r•: =.-.1.:s wr'e='4° 'G~~;' ziR ^'•s''F..r ti- i~r~•T 4yE •~- a'rt`: •f__. ii...~;Y :g :may;.-j..;-i` z,2fi k'1 - - - :t:~% :~?'i^_-".- - .^,~.. - ~~?....".•s•. -,9`'^_..J.-rteCA ",.r?.,i~S~c iiFi i :Y..,~;.2:: _ ..ty,,y?r~ .. . ... •.. - - - -''>it'. :zs .r : t't': - T_:r'::+~',, -r .- .' .r.s! ...s :- .:. ~~ sF,~ ... 6~'y` r _....:, . ... .. .. ,... _ ,~~ . •> . -. .~ ~z ]~. G[V~l~ 11'..Rl.r l.tl~f VlV.I.IJSIli'/\.~[.J - -. . . - - , •' . ?tew uses Qx' r~:use of space withfxt the Oa~~ Shogpilx~• Certt~r Ali ._ - bc~ limitod to -uses a).laWed •witt+oi.tt the securirxx o~ ~, use;peztsit ~ •- utx9ex trio City ~ ~ General ~-cial Zoriiix~ Ordiramxa - or any suc~essa~. 1t.).1 csth~s~ uses r~ai: ~ addressocl i.n coTxiit:l.dri No.: 3 ~boir~ . • - ~ta].l requiz~ use ~ptit review- ar>`i apprc~tal. ~ - Iis ttie erren~t o~ fiit~e parkiax,~ prriblems cat.~e~ by a da~ici~ °itt ~ . - pat-king spaces ~ to ocivex ttses in the oaks• C~nler~ thq ~lai~ciixx~ - . Cr~tanission reserve:- .tho r~.ght tao ho3d a public h~aritxJ ~at ariy . t~.xr~ to review this use Permi~~. atx~ tQ fn>pase me~suzes to mitig'~ta ~ . - the pzrobl.ems. E~trc~iles o~ same o~ the ~a,sut:es whist. may lit - - ~~o~;ed are as folJ.a~is:. •- .. - - ~ - • -i a. Orc~nize~ ari etnployee••caz ix~olisx3/van:Ixsolinc3 gra~am•- • ~ ~ - , b. Rec~oon~igure .ttte- I~"ki-?r.~ • arxar~g~e~rtt to • ~irxxeas~ patk~xx~ - - . yield,' poss~.bl,y. it~lttdfx~g niodi~~.cat~.~ • of cwrti arxi drive=~ay ~ . . islauxis. _ - ~ - ~ - . • c. limit; Pu~uxe ueey to-law: tiaf~ic gexteratirr~ oc~_rcia3 -use '• . - ar uses. which ~do not atti-ac~ Gusttxr~rs- d~~-~.cx~s:which ~ - . are impacted b~- asccessive pax}Girx~ de~sid, .. ..~;;.--~;. d. Adjust--. uses, t}}rough attritican, to des, ~.ntetxsivo uses 6~. • ~~ _ . uses c~t~ich da .nat generate activity drrtrz~ impact~l per~.ocl:a.: • - ' • ~ ~. Idc~li~y existing uses upon.. expira~ian of -their 1,easast to . . d~•~crense activity clut:ing S.ngx~a~ecl.perioc~. ~ -. ~ ~ ' g• • ~tri'ct~x,~ hour ~.b~.. ~tura lames.- - - - ~ ~. r~m~or~.~ ~~~....r~on,~~z ~ ores Arrt~.tect~.irtil. modii~icrations to aacx~unadatQ new tetkzi-z~s s7ui11, b~ ~ . submit#;od tea ~ agprav.+~rl ~ the Ax~hi~:ttti.~.7, arxj ~i~:a Apprcival Caaiunittea. ~*rta. applican'~ may ag~2 c~~i.sicit~ of txte Cr~tetti~f:t~Q to the City Crn~tnail. .. . - • - . Tn the. ~ e+~ant t.~iat this .~ppl~cant . ot'-etlk~er~tt~~tt~ grcrperty amer Vital-~.. de_~ire to nta3ce any mfalor r_hzu~o, ~t1,t.~~~fvtt sar-am~min~:. i.~~ ~ ~ • the a~.~>xwvd davalap~r~t ~lt~t~ o~ • bu~.l<finy . ~x'~tit~ . t~ wr t~~Cra~- ~ 1 • requcs~ . r~Yi revises ~ctevea.n~ glen ax; huildi~ paz~Y«th ~~ia.I~, ~•: - •. suf,~mitteci t.a 'tt5m t~lrectar. ,.a~ ~la.~-uitur~ Davelrri~itert~. ~.~- ~ ; ~,._. - ~ .. , (~ix~or. maw . at• ~~.r?di?'~'3 ~ .rha~' tha..attme~~_are, m_ ~c~r .rsrr~I ;tict.'.:~o~;:' ~ : • - ~ ~ . I< r~•_t'.i ..5 •~ .. R, •~~}.;~ti~s~ ~y~r~5: n,.' x~~.y~ - ~'~.iiJ..1:: :.1...r . - -. ::d' ::C`r 's. ~, ~' .-a!' .. ).Y- •'•+'-'..( ,... t~~r: a'~_.: M d'.`.''4 :~^:i'wtrr .'~' u~y, 1 ~~ - tom'. ~~~~ - ~.,,... ._. .- - -..~t•-....--.- °~~-_.: s`.---i_......!a•*'..1+H..s`ilr..:<.c.._,...s.ret..~~d:;;:i-~r~ti_..snu?..~,.:__..a<•~o.:.~..f4,?..i...~..:~..sia'`s~..J~~..~i..~Aa't~'a.e,~.a:~.i:::..:r.:•.:_e..._ ,tom _ ~. ~.. _ ~ RL '. i:r -Y:'w .'%'~ - ~.±'S:` _ !t•a - :.p~'r ~:r~.r.-.li :i'S'. ). 1:: _._).~l~k :'. :." 4''::4. i. .~.J~~:'I.c'' _ _ t~. ~, l.h.~ _ - - . - ~ ~' _ F. - afCeci: fie geriexal ~appeara.r~: oC the aa:ea Qr ths= zntei:eata o:E . a~mexs oP propezty ~ w~,thin~ or adjo~ning~ tl~e dev~],apmFxlt~ ~r~a, -tha ' ,. pi.~cEoz may cei-ti,f'y the charr~e Qr~ the ~eviseci~plati. ~I~ .such := :- - .- approval i ~ wittih~:id, ttia app].i~lant m~ty ap.l. ~.o ttt~ pl.arining ~- . Comaniasiot, If tY-e~ charx~e , al;c~, imaL•er~.al~, ~tha Director ~2~, .. auk~mit- -,aid charr~es to •frte -Planititx~ ~CaJ~mtission• for. ~ppmVa'!.- ~~:. ~ : - ' tt~a ehatx~e is c~enieci by thQ,Pr,anriiiicj Ca~aniss~un, flio.applicar~~ . may appeal. to thQ City Cntuicil .as p>:wided in t3n~itiartc~ ~b~ o~ , the City o~ Cupprt'i.tio. If the c2ianga is appx~teci, an apl fiy - . • bo mach ~.ry an l~ritere.~ted p~~ty. F1.trther, any mant~x o~ the Cf.~~r. ~ . Gounci.l tray l~e~ie~,c a heari.rxy lxafnza trip City ~bw~cil; ~~sa~c'1 ~ . request to be nkade within i;en (loy days f'roaa tho date, o~ :appxaval ~ ~- - s~~tlnrl the cYsa,Y~~ has been . approvExl ~ trto planitir~~ Coaroni.ssiart. Rye e}cpiratiort of fi~~e ua~ pexinit is ~'uly 21; 198©.•.(Secbian B:A of ' - Ct:clisvance No. 652 as revised t3y Ordi.r~r-ce Na. ll.7G) -- - '. S9s rerely~ .- - .. . ,~ - _ . - crt„~ -Crux - - . ~ ~ - ~ ~ - _ ~ . • CC: Depar4s~tlt of A181'itt,137~ atxl DE3ValU~~e'rit~ . - 212G9 SEoverLS C`X~Uc t3xxtr.~nrat;t3 . Zitps'xtina, cA ~ asor,' ~ . ~ . - - - t ., .: ... _... ..._, .., e=.~r,` .,.e-__:*:w~.=;:~r::..-?~.es_i'".''-.~'`.~I~'~+`;Jr..c.-hy-~.'Y$.~>~'L:.~.,1.~~.;:...~5~.~ltt . ~ - .. -- - , . .. _ ~M=.''..•... `.ir'•d .._ -. .r .,v1'-_t~t rf.0`x.~. ._.-. r. i:1`:r"~.~ .. .. Exhibi$ ®~ ~. Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:37 AM To: Colin Jung . Subject: FW: Planning Commission Meeting regarding OAKS SHOPPING COMPLEX for your file.... --=--Original Message----- From: Nat Nataraj [mailto:nat_nataraj@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 7:43 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: i=w: Planning Commission Meeting regarding OAKS SHOPPING COMPLEX ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Nat Nataraj <nat_nataraj@yahoo.com> To: clerk@cupertino.org Cc: nagamani.nataraj@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 6:51:41 PM Subject: Planning Commission Meeting regarding OAKS SHOPPING COMPLEX Respected Members, We reside at 10599 Nathanson Avenue, Cupertino. We are against the building of the Hotel complex at the current OAKS complex. Reasons being: 1. Increase of traffic congestion on MARY avenue. The completion of the bicycle/Ped bridge will bring in additional bike/foot traffic on Mary Avenue. 2. Mary Avenue serves as a parking facility for the cultural events held at Memorial Park and De Anna College. The addition of this new building would impact the current use of this road. 3. The heavy foot and automobile traffic combined with the traffic from the Hotel complex would complicat things. 4. Why add a new hotel, when we have the Cupertino Inn and the Cypress Hotel nearby? The Hotels are probably running at 50% occupancy rate. , We are extremly concerned about the traffic and speeding motorists on Mary and the addition of a Hotel will make this street more unsafe and unfit for cyclists and Pedestrians. Regards, Nagamani Nataraj B.S. Nataraj 2~ - 2oa 6/2/2008 EXHIBIT B - 2 Colin Jung From: KarerrNgo jkngo@shpco.comj Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:35 PM To: Colin Jung; dkaneda@ideasi.com; pauldbrophy@yahoo.com; HMartyMiller@yahoo.com; Rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net; Igiefer@sbcglobal.net Cc: Steve Piasecki; 'peter pau' Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn- Applicant Comments to Staff Report and Recommendations Dear All, Attached please find our response to the conditions proposed by the Community Development Department in the staff report. Thanks Karen _ ._. From: Colin Jung [maitto:CollN@cupertino.org] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:1i PM To: dkaneda@ideasi.com; pauldbrophy@yahoo.com; HMartyMiller@yahoo.com; Rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net; Igiefer@sbcgiobal.net Cc: Steve Piasecki; kngo@shpco.com Subject: FW: Marriott Residence Inn- Applicant Comments to Staff Report and Recommendations The applicant, Karen Ngo, requested that I forward her comments onto the Planning Commission. Paper copies will be available at the hearing tomorrow. Colin Jung Senior Planner City of Cupertino -----Original Message----- From: Karen Ngo [mailto:kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:19 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: 'Peter Pau' Subject: RE: Marriott Residence inn Colin, Including or excluding the garage? Now would this be accomplished, through an agreement with the City? Also, how would we implement it so that it is only limited to the number of lost Mary Avenue stalls? Also, an update on the other issues bouncing around: 1)Architectural enhancement: Our architect is working on a revised elevation to the front based an Larry's comments. We da not see a need to embellish the freeway side. 2)Condo Plan: Attached is a revised condo plan to have 2 condos rather than 4 condos. 3)Phasing Plan: We cannot change the site plan to move the hotel 20 feet towards Stevens Creek. We had looked at a similar option but by pushing the hotel 20 feet, the circulation and parking changes and the retail becomes so small that it is not worth building. We need to keep the phasing plan which from the last hearing, the majority of the planning commission were ok with. 4)$100,000 contribution towards Stevens Creek: We feel it is not fair to impose this on our project unless the City passes an ordinance and it is imposed on all projects. 21 - 205 6/10/2008 Page 2 of 4 5}Stevens Creek Improvement: We can only improve the section in front of Shane Co. as shown on our puns. 1f you rather we improve a section closer to Stevens Creek, we can do that as long as the cost does not exceed what we are spending on the Shane section. Let me know if there is an area you want us to look at. Thanks Karen From: Colin Jung [mailto:ColiN@Cupertino.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:06 PM To: Karen Ngo Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Karen: To get around the foss of Mary Avenue street parking (We don't want this to be an issue), what do you think about sharing a like number of shopping center parking stalls on just the festival days at Memorial Park? Let me know. Colin Jung -----Original Message---- From: Karen Ngo [mailto:kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:06 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Thanks! From: Colin Jung [maiito:ColiN@cupertino.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:06 AM To: Karen Ngo Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Try opening these jpg files. Colin Jung ----Original Message-- From: Karen Ngo [mailto:kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:04 PM To: Colin Jung _ Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Colin, I can't seem to download.the PDFs from the Link. Could Lany just send us the PDFs? Thanks Karen 21 - 2os 6/10/2008 June 9, 2008 Planning Commission and Community Development Department Gity of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Ca 95014 Re: Oaks Deveopment Dear Planning Commission and Community Development Department: Following please find our responses to some of the proposed conditions to our above referenced project: 2)Development Approval: Access to underground parking podium will be limited to the hotel for Phase I. Upon completion of Phase 11, underground parking will be limited to the hotel and the mixed-used building. 4}Project Phasing: We request herewith that the Phase II approval be in effect for 5 years from City Council acceptance. 6b)Landscape Plan: Heart of the City Specific Plan improvements will be Limited to the section between Mary Avenue and the west side of the east driveway (section directly in front of Shane Co.) only. 6c)Landscape Plan: The replacement of two Oaks that were previously removed is not part of the new development. 7)Master Use Permit: We request to modify the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats to 600 instead of the proposed 500. 8)Green Building: We will achieve LEED certification, but not Silver. 9)Notice of l=ees, Dedications, Reservations or Other Exactions: Please fet us know the amounts of such fees. 12)Building Materials and Architecture: Please see attached revised elevations 13)Pedestrian Improvements for Highway 85 Bridge: We do not agree to such contribution unless there is an ordinance requiring such. 29)Traffic Signal Improvements: Developer contribution to this condition shall be limited to $15,000. Sincefeiy,~.-- ; ..;~~~.. Karen Ngo 21 - 207 Exhibit C - ~ . P 1',1 \ '-1 i A r ei ~~ : t 2 `~ i`~°t~i.i ` ~s\~; v, .,.14~;utiY, ' ~.. ,, ~ 1 1 ~ ~ °`. 1 a~ i 4 ., : 3fy `~ ; ,1 . r-. ~-- ~ ns ,t ~ '~2 'i- -~ T 1 ' w ~ `-, :.fi=r sga i 5 a .,. 1. ~ ~ ~ S 1 ~ ~A4• ~j.a_ ~ !, r UNIT A ~T ` ~ ~ 3 ~ }I ~ ~~393 ~Ry ~ ~ .".r;~•;;~~ -.r-'_c ~, I uwT A UNIT e ~ ti~ rcc! `~4 ~•' 1 ~ ~,a ~rr 1^.~ ,~ ~.., f ~. ... ~ ewrele ecru ' aW ~G~ Y + "n. ~3 jts-Z'~.~-..r' -'i~ 1~y-`~oa:a.a, `~~ I I •r w`K 1. .>LY..,:, ~v ,a.) ~~ ~ ~ 1L=r, •,. "` •{~~f :~~r •.. •: 'u.. ~ ,,, ; '°=~ ` s3~ ' --lS= =--:~`^---:a'- .f1 1 a'yt`~jf -' ~- < '~~ ~ . ~ . ~ °'y-a t ~ t~w -f ~ ~ . r `_ -~ ; .S- a^,v ew t ~ ~.. _ . --+ti:..z~'-i ~"hr ~ ~, ~ Wl + i ~ ti rs ~;...j-. , , , ,- '~ MANGY i VC t Jr ` , , _.~-- ~ ~ ~.+ t t~X ~~ g 4 a .u i~t rt dN ~''~wi y++,:~,k, LY,,-,tt .t,~ `~~Lt~~y~i•est ~T~1+,'riy .~~--_4 .c~-. a .-~ j^r: J ~``pp~~[tt.i1 r''b--";~%} np7 `~ ,•s~~~• Y-3"'C a -; r _ ~~1 'i~ 'i` ,~~,;gFs,•y„-, y\fy%' ..,, 1.1- t ~~' '~ ~a~., d ~~1 • - ^t s L ,~ l~~~•. b~ ~ ~. , ' M ~ .•i, 1 t a, • t 4 1 ~ir7` r-. •--e::s, .~t~~::\ .` ~~`tF "q~'j.. t ~,1~ t~ ~ ~' l'~yra" 4 rF t~ y-~_- '~'#~1.. ° .. 1 1 \' 1'•, , \'...t~ Y'.. _ ~`~. , u'_ 1 ~ J. -' 1; ~c `E'F~ ~;»• ~ tt .\'`t ~i v,. w~ .::z. ,,~I. y, "^~i-.-' . .•~.'~'" a.-~ ,\~•.~::' 1~ti~, i "1 ~C ~ O ~y, f',hl' ° ~y 1T ~~it - r I-• ~ :. tr. t ;~}•, t . .5 h, t •Ir-F~~ .'!" _ r, ... •:~,,... ~`t,-.t ~ ~.. ,1 Q ~ JJO '' ~' ;; y tl Y'' ~ ,_„ ~~ •xC',"_ r :,, ~. t`ii.' `'`-'+.~.$',~ .; 1\ •. t . Y.,. ti r 1'1-1 . l ~` t t 1 ~ . ,~ `~ ~ '`- ~ ~- '~; KS l.r ~ O LL 1 i ~1+ ,~ - , +r'~ `~S'y't-~~l t,•_~'~ - ~., 4` S.~ .•~t ~ 'r'°~5g'°„ ~ t, r :~, t p r =~~;, ~~ ~ o~.~- c ,.-I~v s COMMON ~~.-i~.r- ~ . ', •:"~:.; .,~ : ~ a. 'cam- ~~~„':;;la.,.~ °z Z ~Z ~~ _ ~ o ~ '' ~~\~ - ~ =' ._ r = ,1.- AREA `"'~_.rll '' ~1 t`~ -~ -~~° F `' ~t,. ~~,1 ~,. ~ ~ ~, \°~ .Y~ ~~ PARCEL 2 y +.,s. ~, ;,._ . ~ .. `_.`• L+~~ ~ +- ~ ~ o ° ~ ~ i_ AREA ~::,::, ty "h.; ~ - ~ , t ~' .IY~ ~~ r.n'~i l~ '; s~~~~'rt+, r,• ~~ ~,.- ~ `h~ ~. 5.5 AQ' _i ci° t f -`- : -w may` s 1~~1 "~..5'~- ~ ~ Qmu ..~ 1 ' `" ,(FOR ~ ' ~ - "'nom ss -.. - '+ 1+' ~~.f '4-1 ~-~ \ , t, t \• ,~, ~,~ X11-~ 1~•', ' '~ 651 _ - ,~s.7o' ._ ~' r ~ i Kw.us `~: `~F3i: x~ S' -x i ~ \ ~ `~.''r 1FICy'~~.5~~ H V ~'.__''"~.i~~.rr r`~ -. ~+.. ;l 4" _ \ `~f 1~, 1 x , ~J/ ` ~~ t 4 t-xV1MM'11A~ u~~~ J' .., ~ ~ ~_ _~ ~ t: `+ t , '~:. i +,-':rr .[.u R 1, l i, ~ l.., if Z ~ •.~5'r ` ~~ , ,-~~~''-'wj~' ~; r ~~'S' i ~ I^~ I ^~~ys, r a~ T ~i-'~!• ~~~,r.1~1 y l,` ::,:r:. p . , 1 1 r' ~ ` ~Q.~ ~^"' r: .... t ~ i \ ~ ~ X ; l ; I ~''1~', ipreu. w ~~1\-+' t ."~'}w~•`~Y'4f06~L`9f~V+'~~LQFED::~r _.-j-•-rT-~.^T,^r-1-- ~. _ ~.. ~ ,1...~.:'~'•-t..: a.)', i :, ::X" ' Yc~,.,n u `i~ 1 ,t ,l ~ 0:4\p~A 1F~~ ~~ ~ I ,~ r ~ r r l ~ J is r ~ ~~ _ _ ~ ~ ~~,.u-_ , t ' e_ ~/~ ~ "~ ~ ~; l E ~ 1 i f r t ~ .jt ~ k_ -r r:.. {~ -"_ ,tom ~ ''~.L \~t t ; ~ I~w ~ - tl t ~..... +`, _~~_:+uu~...._ ~~` ,J~ ..•. ~", ~ ~_. •'!. , 1pp ( ~ `t ~ Le't t i I I r !,_, ~.` ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ J..~Y:~' 1 ~-+-:~-`- 'cr--'.~-- ~'.?.,~""'~"1-. `,--~~~y~ '-~- t '--~' : ~."' ~r i .~ -'~r-l~ ~ _ F"' -°` l~ ~ i ~_.....,'~ ~~ ~ ~: 1• I~ i. ~ i!'-~•r ~. ~ . (' t ":-, ( --.. ~ ~.. ~~, - -~ °'~ "R ~ .t. L-^[^_s'TpA I I j I ~t ~ ~ I ~ t:t - •ar 12 l ,140 ~TM~ ~•3. 0 Z°+'e W~ ~-, _ I 1, I ~' ~~i 1y( T Y7 dN, ~ ti.~ ~ - _',~• ,~~': '~ `~ l?~,.t -9- r ~.eP ~ t I J_ `~~ .-yIIL\~-.. ~ -~ •-~~ Wa _».n~~=~~_'~y,~~i-yP, .'.txsx/ 1,_r~ ,3~__-_ ~._ ' - _-~. ~, +w"--".1.-'~ +~. - .. al .r~-. s~,. ~_ ___, -- _- 'T"'_ _ .~ __ _ - ' - ~=-'+=-r. r__ - ._~.._,.._"'_"- :-...tom-^ r"~ _ _ ~~';'~`i .~ . r• ~ STEVENS CREEK BLVA sit ~ °°n~ cstE rxw 1 °'""' """ I C--2 ~I 2 a 2 MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA EAST ELEVATION SCM! MS:1'd WEST ELEVATION eaN.e wr: rd Ilf ~.,:..{E Taisei Construction Corporation Johnson Draund .I, pN dION,INC .-.z,,.,..~W ~ D R-7 ~~~ Exhibit ®-- Z ~' `~G~I~~I'~eG~ kYf~~~4~:Y~3~~.L'•I~~ 4~~+I~~II~E~.~~L1~~j ~~~ti~~:~= ~~~~ I ''NIIIU III ~ JII~'VI~''kJ 1 ~ ~~''~..+~ ~'~...1~ _. ~ll.l;l~~~'~'I;I~1.bt°d c1Fa~' S'eA~'f~~5 _~ .~. ,} S ~~ . Q~; I__111I~_ ~f~Rlt~!'T'A~. P~Y'.ir.1WT~._ ~ ~~.. ~J 5"' ;~ ' "G ~ .t ry; '.l L ~ iL ._ ...-. i ~' 1 I ~.:-..~-a. ~ .~;~,~1 ~~ !".iti ~ .~:I i 'e ... _........, ,~t~_ _, ...... +..., s~ EXHiBiT E ~° 2 Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Manday, June 09, 2008 11:51 AM To; Colin Jung Subject: FW: The Oaks Shopping Center far your file.... -----Original Message---- From: Karleskind@aol.com [mailto:Karieskind@aoi.oom] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:01 AM To: mmiller@interorealestate.com; igiefer@sbcglobal.net; rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net Cc: dkaneda@ideasi.com; City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: The. Oaks Shopping Center Hello 1 am writing for two reasons: VUhy are we not being notified via a citywide notification about these meetings? It does make one wonder once again why the city would want to keep us in the dark. Projects such as this one created an uproar from residents in the past. The commission must know by now that the residents want to be informed and wish to have an opportunity to have their voices heard. I understand the last meeting or two were held at the exact same time as other important city meetings. One has to wonder why it was done that way. I fear this project will negatively impact this comer with regards to appearance, parking and general traffic around the park, senior center, college and shopping center. I do nat agree with changing the setback which is an exception to the HEART OF THE CITY plan. Thank you Sherrie Karieskind Cupertino Resident Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cookin wct ith Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. 21 - 212 6/10/2008 Page 1 of 1 Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 91:49 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: 4 Story Hotel and removal of 48 parking spaces for your file.... ----Original Message----- From: AJScattie@aol.com [mailto:A7Scottie@aol,com] Sent: Sunday, June D8, 2008 11:23 AM To: rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net; mmil}er@interorealestate.com; dkaneda@ideasi.com; Gty of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: 4 Story Hotel and removal of 48 parking spaces While I am not against the hotel and mixed use building, I am against taking away 48 parking spaces on Mary Avenue. The screening is necessary but the trees.should ga on the hotel property, not Cupertino land. These spaces are used for events at Memorial park all year, they are used by people attending programs at the Flint Center ,they are used on ~Iea Markets days, they are used when the Senior Center has special events and there is not enough room in the senior parking lot, they are used by DeAnza students who cannot afford the parking permits. There will be Summer programs going on all summer. The spaces are needed for overflow parking. I cannot understand why the city is so willing to give up those spaces. Alice Ramsauer . X0531 Castine Avenue Cupertino 408-738-4656 _.. -- -_ -- Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. 21 -.213 6/10/2008 STEVEN S CREEK BOULEVARD CUPERTINO CA BenILIe DTllae: fi88 Fird Slreel, Bta 8101 Benicia, CA 8/510 Tel: (T0T~7B5.Ofi08 Vdlelo Office: BIB Narin Slreel Velle~a, CA BB5B0 Tel: Ii011556.1711 - ue®ercineuchilecd.con J m ' -,; U J u W ,~, W W -_ ~ z ~ ~ O m, ,t .~ U ~ N ~ w ~~ '~ I ~ ~ X U ~ = of ? ~x . ~ t ~. } - . ~ s Q Q ~ ~ O w x II - 2 ~ ~ - : I- 2 U °- - - ; r. ~T! i i I I I VICINITY MAP OWNER ARCHITECT DRAWING INDEX DATE: ~-30-0 '~' ~' ,i I i-~- I '° I PR ~~f-°'o I JECT 3~ TE ARCHITECNRAL CML REV. NO. REV. DATE ~ 4 ~ ~e . : e ~ - ~ K 5 SUNNYVALEHOLDING,LLC ARC IrLC. ARCHITECTS oR-1 oR•z COVER SHEET srrEPLAN PHASE -1: TENTATIVEMM: i i g-20-07 1 K,9 '' ~~ I ~ ~ ~ i s '+w ' ~ ~ ! ` C/O SAND HILL PROPERTY 580 FIRST STREET, SUITE B-201 oR•z.f PHASE-13fTE PLAN C-1 TfRE SHEET TM-1 1TTLE SHEET o1-31-oe i ~ B =~: -xaay ly ~ ~ I ', oil 489 S. EL CAMINO REAL BENICIA, CA 9451D DR-3 DR•3 7 FLOOR PLANS PHASE•1 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN C•2 C S GENERALNOTE3 nA-2 MM SHEET NOTES AND LEGEIID ' 02-04-08 ~, wml,.r~ I ~ ~ - ~--~. ~ ~ i _- ' eo I ' . k ~•5 SAN MATED, CA 94402 TEL: (707)745-0502 . DR-4 RETAILICOIN@f11gJ ELEVATIONS - C-4 TM-9 PRELIMNARh GRAgNGBDRAINAGE PLAN E%ISTING COFDRION TM-4 F'RELIMIJARI'IfTILm PLAN 03-28-08 ~ ~~,,,,.,,., , g I ` I ~ _ ~ , I ~- - ~~ TEL: 650.344-1500 FAX: 707 745-0592 ( ) DR-5 DR•B HOTEL FIRST FLOORPLAIJ HOTEL UPPERFLaat PLAN C-5 C•B DEMOLRIONPLAN GRADING PLAN CONDO _, , L_etnn ~" ! ,~c~w ewc a'Parb^e - FAX:650-344-0852 DR-T HOTEL FASTBWEST ELEVATONS C-T PLAN DTILm PLAN C-1 FBiST FIDOR I e0"0®a'c I 1 -~ ~ I _ - stump 1 ae OR•S DR•9 HOTEL NORTH 680UTH ELEVATIONS HOTEL COLORBAIATERLAL PALETTE C-8 DETALS C•1 BASEMENT 8 II rel. ' N~~ ~i ~ "~ '~ ~°"`'~ ~' ,~ ~ ~~a_ S I~ a ' ~" SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED FOR B°•' so • 2 DEMDLTiIDNMABTERPLAN PHASE • 1 DEMOLRION PLAN PHASE d: D.3COMPLIANDE 9 r COVER SHEET I I p,,,, ~~ I _ ~ c•f c - I ca COMPt14NCE EXHBIT TrnESrEEr ~ ,~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $=. II ~~ :' BUILDING ALTERATION •Z4 HOUR FITNESS C•2 GENERAL NOTES LANDSGPE r ~~ y I C'S ~} ~' t I £ ~ ~ C 3 NOTES AND G 1 I ~ _ i - eA ~1 CS-7 COVER SHEET - C / LE END IX rrmw. -~. I ~ € - ~;'- ur, rly ~ ~,L `~~ ~ ~'s< I o~wryl~ ~ ~ CITYOFCUPERTINO DESIGN REVIEWRESUBMtTTAL A-1 az DENOLffgNdFLOOR PLAN RaOFP1AN - C-6 c-e ISTING CONDITION L•7 DDNDEPTUAL LAtOBCAPE LEf#NDB DEMOLRION PLAN L•2 CONCEPTUAL LAFOSGIPE PLAN (NORTH) GRADING PLAN L-3 CONCEPTUALLANOSCAPEPLAN(SOUTIi) 5 ~ ! DR 1 -M'aaewatt~ i- l I a«r Q~_ ~ ur«u-- '.i~ N PLANNING DEPARTMENT APRIL 20D6 A•3 ELEVATIONdWA1L SECTIONS C-7 UTILm PLAN L•4 CONCEPR1AL lAFDSCAPE PLAN PHASEI~NORTH) E . - ~ a -ly € ~s _ • ~~ ~ ~,I A-4 DETAILS C•B DETAILS L•B CONCEPRML LANDSCAPE PLAN F41A9E1f90lITH) ~"'~II~ i iw~-^'4K~bie,ey,.~ _ - d`~ - °'„r, ++~ SHf1 ALTAI AC9M LAND TITLE 9URYEY ~oHNO.: SHP03 PARKING REQUIREMENT: rte` ~ \ OFF~TREET PARKNIG PROVDED X05 SPACES UNDERGROUND PARKING PROVIDED 1~ SPACES TOTAL 4708PACES Benicle Olllee: f 560 Flnt BInN, e te. e-201 S Benllle, CA BIe10 i TII: (707)T/5.050 0 r VellellOlllee: E 616 Merle Bheel i Ydle)o, CA e1500 I Tei: (TOr)5senn l ueQerelncerehite ete.com Q I m W W ~ O ~ e ~ U s a Z i W r ~ ~ X I U otS ~ e 2 cn O = ~ a c~ U H = e I G I P ,,. _ _ ~ r*, ~t7 B 19,9BQ S.F „ ' ' ~ 110 6.:~::: . • ' i1 ~'1 1 ' ~ t ~ ~ Sa ,: ~ /~ r~ h 4 1 ,x~ '.t I ,i . ~ I I eaaaefeufea ~h, °'~' , ~` ~ I E~ W l AIIT ~;' I I W oe - ~~ RETNLI p I~ , B,000S.F ^ j r ', RETAIL3 (E) • , 1 0 4 ~ 9 . .. 1 I--~-- . O: ~ ' ,. fffTAY. FPgTIY6MI: , .1.. .. a ~ . • r ~ . 5,SOO S.FS.F 1BAe18F. A < j.if ~ Y , '' 1 $ A o-, ~ I 5 6e,1B1 F . ' .. ~ ~ ' V' : . n .~ ,'ems Y '~ ~ ~ . _ _ ., .. :.n ~~ y ~ L ~. ~. ,t >. .. < o r _.. .... v .~ 4 _..- . ; ~. , . eewieert -. pox _ ...._ . ...,.. .. STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ~\ `R~ PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN A T SCALE: 1'=4Q-0' DE AN2A COLLEGE CAMPUS DATA: 5-30-07 i REV. N0. REV. DATE 9-20-07 01-31-08 f 02-04-OS 03-28-08 D4-04-08 I I PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ~ e DR-2 ~ ,a9NO.: SHP03 r-----~ NEw ~ r--i I LOCATION OF ~- I~UNDERGROUND I - I TRANSFORMER Senlcle OfRU: SIO Flrrt Slrnt, Sle. 8201 Senlcle, CA B16f0 TN: (707 7160602 Velblo Office: 818 Yuln 81rnt Vdle~o, CA 81610 Td: (T0T~516.1111 erepuclncneBlUele.com J m _ ~ GROUND FLOOR PLAN scALE:1' = 2aa :: BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN scALE:1' • 2aa ~ :SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1' = 20'-0' ~ :THIRD FLOOR PLAN scALE:1' • 2a.a U W W w O ~ ~ U a ~ w Z ~ j ~ W r ~ W ~ Q X_ ~tf U ~ ago O m } z a a ~ a ~ w _ ~? ~ H 2 U DATE: 5-30-07 REV. N0. REV. DATE 9-20-07 D1-37-OB 02-04-08 03-28-OB FLOOR PLANS DR-3 JOBNO.: SHP03 ~ i y p e @ ,`8 e Benlele Olllu: 550 Pint 8lreet, 8ta 610 1 Beelcle, CA 51510 ~-----~ NEW Tel: (70iJ 715.0601 j r-_~ I LDCATIONOF Vejhlo 0511cc ~ j j~ UND5RGR0UND 818 Yuln Slnet I `--J I • ~ TRASLSFORA£R Vdle~o, CA 51510 Tei: p57) 555.1111 ~- ----- '°"1 - --- ercdercincerchlleele.cam / SYVRCHGEAR ` ~ ~ 1 ~.. ROOM ... ' BIID: m ' 'B' ' W W ' ~ ~ ~. .. a ~ Q V ~ ~ I ~ . LOCATION OF a ~ ~ Z _... ,`,~ ~, TRANSFORMER ~ L jJ 1 `: . ~ ~ W 0 ~ , ... ~ 2 r , ~i , W ~ Q 6 ' X aC U ~ ~ Q ago O 19 I ` I ~ Y~ Z ~ ~ - O i ~ STRUCTURAL Q j ~ ® i i PAHELS W 2 a HOTEL I ~- ~ ,- ~ i1 LAUNDRY i i 14 F' = V N ' ,.. i__. ; i - F~ , . ._..,. ~ STAFF `-- ~ ~ ----~ LOUN ~qr' . ..... ~ ! Bo O " EL ~ F a ; RAMP UP J 21',0" ,Ti _ a e ~ BASEMENTPARgNG ~ b 34 SPACES ~ e i., ~~' g - - - .. _ ....- .... e, _: , ......MECH..... gw BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN GATE: r3O-07 5 k ~ SCALE: t' = 20'-0' REV. N0. REV. DATE 9-2C-O7 D1-31-08 e oz-oa-oe Da-2e-oe M 4 PHASE-1 BASEMENT ~ FLOOR PLAN , B DR-3.1 ~ ~ ~•~ SHPO3 I ~ _ ~ ~`t r ~' ~, , ~ ~ ~ ~R ~ - ~ • `r~y~ ~i i ~y • ~~3 i~ ~ -,~ ~ ~, 'T M~~A Ali * r ~': _ , .4 Lk ';~y '. ~ L~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ 1 P ~AP~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ,:~; , 4~ ., ~ ~, ~~ -- I ii• k ' 1 ~ ~~ ~ - ' ~ o~' ~ ~ ~- ,. - ~ .... / Aiii~ \ f I _ ~lll~. F: _ ~~, I _ - _ r -- I : ~ ~ ^ ' _ I a ~~ ~ 1 ~~~ . ~ i~ ~~t, h r - - to ~ ~~ ~ h ~ . u ' ~~~. ~ y: •: ~ ~. +~~~= n ;,, ~. -~i ~ ~ -~ ~ ..i 1 r~ ~, '1 -_ j~~;1 , ~'~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ THE OAKS MIXED-USE PROJECT ~ ~~ V : ~ . ~ o Z ~ ; o o N ° ~ ° V ~ y ~ ~ Z~" ° ° s ~ ~ HIGHWAY 85 & STEVENS CREEK BLVD ~ - e~~ W ~ `~ ~ o ~ a J o o o ~ g CUPERTINO, CA - N ns..ur..n.x ug a nKS e~.nxm ue sFer umrs W n w<s OD neerzv Oo m i J s om xk moee ~ A ae ru Mw iw.r rta: imam. ~-us a avemrt+a n ~xr Kmm. x wa ar w ruer, rs mv.sm •n~ m a~~ m na vcarc~nars nnimia wi omor aus uo raAUmai ~naxs .m .xe ae xsir ahnn •x m:z wwws w 3 o s~ancAmxs oaAmmx nsu r~ nm ia a ~ wvnw¢ v ~s uwewn MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA 111 Johnson Braund DESIINC80DP,DlC. Poona 408.188.8300 waw.jbdgoom Taisei Construction Corporation D R-5 `-----J FIRST FLOOR PLAN Noarn scuE 3r~r: r-0~ MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN ~, Johnson Braund ~.~ v scn~ vsr:r~ Taisei Construction Corporation CUPERTINO, CA ~~~., DR-6 ~. MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN Johnson Braund ~~,~ EAST ELEVATION s~ ~:,~.~ WEST ELEVATION scuE ~sr: r.~ Taisei Construction Corporation CUPERTINO, CA ~~ DR-7 NORTH ELEVATION scue ysr:r~ SOUTH ELEVATION sca.e air: r.~ MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA 1Jl johnsoaB~auna Taisei Construction Corporation DESICNGWP, QiG ~~., DR-8 ~.,~~ iu PuNTS pzrv n/71T 'gN4ER PEACHY N7 PAINTS /17ri fi5/4ZC 711E CNAN4E' ~..~ SHERYIN MIWN,IS SNd11A-B YNgTNUCU ~~ TlARKNgdY HOOF aNEx c,ATENaa BENPoUCE RATTAN SF1A1 - PAINIA gtEDl MIIiIIAL YATERNILS ''ANTACI' NI59g1 lEl(NAE COLORS AND MATERIAL PALETTE MARRI OTT RES I D E N C E I N N Taisei construction Cor oration Johnson Braund p >~,~ CUPERTINO, CA ~,~,~.,~.~ DR-9 ~.,~~ - ~ 1 ~ t" - ~I ,~. ~~ \ '` ~ - ~' .~ ~ J. ~ r:<,,~ ~~ ~ a~ __ y \. ~~ ~ a ~ .~ Y .~- \ ,~„~r - f ~, j m irrni;nim~m mu uid \. ~~ SITE PLAN w g- - F-1 FABRIC AWNING SUNBRELA - ARMADA CRRUS 497&0000 RT-1 ROOF TILES: US TILE P_1 PAINT: FRAZEE P_2 PAINT: FRAZEE RUSTIC MEDERA BLEND CL 2741W - ALCAZAR BROWN CL 2741 W • BISCOTTI R_3 PAINT: FRAZEE P_4 PAINT: FRAZEE P_5 PAINT: FRAZEE CL1504M-RODEO CL1556A-CORKSCREW 8296N-TREASURE CHEST M-1 METAL STORE FRONT AEP SPAN -COOL DARK BRONZE I I-IC UHI'lJ IVI11ltU-UJC F'KUJtI~ I® HIGHWAY 85 8 STEVENS CREEK BLVD, CUPERTINO, CA ~ aaNa NnDI ~' i 0 2 f D P /~ Y DEMOLITION SITE PLAN .,~ SCALE: 1' • 40' SHEET NOTES Qi awnETar auavE (q txuTEx BUIDNG(PMA4 I oENOUnaN) D AFYO14 (q BUIIaMC w m OD6N0 wYE DP FlTIESS m11EA (PNASE D OD1011110N) ^s iRU1soRllm ro a rmncATEn, CONTRACTOR m lE Mni POE ~ `., {~. ~ $ r i ` sTa a m,t aax a2EJ A i ~ ~ 3 ~ 8U1LDik0' t ~,,.. ~ ~ '. .~:. ~ ' ~; , ~ ~ ;~ a , `~`: ~ A ~ a ~ ` Y aN sDltr tale aaa wngwo 2 n,lv s BUILDING 400 STEVENS CREEK 80UlEVARD ~~~ BUILDING 200 GENERAL NOTES A) IEi1A ro AID COaRaINATE YTnI C(NnETANiS auwN65 AND sPEaICATDNS rOR q CIEArI 9.wFACfS nEYAnwD ETFOSSa APTEA Dnaunax nCwt m SPEWC OFYOI1110P IEOIARDIDfR i0R CON4ATANYS NEnK. WI01 EnSINO A0IACFIIT SUFY25 Oft PIEPAAE FDR NEW wOnIL B) PFKDIN lIE OFYOlI1XN OF 1XC FDSINO 31M1CnwE Nllll wFAi CYTE AND F) CONTRACTOR 91YL NLOw ALL CUOElAES N YIBORST AEPoRT 011 wnl auu rags w anon Nor m uEaARaTE sTwfcTURE YD EauFYOrt NIOPFA 71EE xA1gRD AND ulaTwcTDx wnw TnEF wawTr, YID nur s ro PEYYn. ug nE REPOIIT m cerutwE weal TREFS SNYi ff SA1ED YD q F sTRUCTUnu IERFRS NOi 91oRN m nE IFYONEa NiERFFRE wnt nE RN~+ sxAU ~ RFYDIED. NEW MOtl( YYFp/,RT ND1FY 71E ARCXI7ECT AID ODTYN MNTRN a) OEINAIIION ACiM1En NE AFWeEO m rOAFagI m AOID RECIIU1nN5 Y1111010UnOx PDDR ro RrYawD YEYwERS SECTION A17. N0IFICAn011 91N1 BE FllID wM nE ApD AT IF.Att D) nFYO\E OFYOUTICN nE16 NOIFD CdIP1E1ELY m AIE aA.4 YATEeALS 14 OAR PRNw m ODDIInON. oEYaunw RDLwES amwc wAa of ~uNLa, wYU mows. ANO PwsEs A6 IEaEwm m TIE ODFNT IXAT NSTYU11011 of NEW Yalw CAN BE ACCOpIl41m. E170AONAIE WTN OnER ORATYN,'S. FOR 1NE ETfIFNT DF NEw eDPoC D nNE e,ar aoNe .wnl w.D«o ~,~ BUILDING 800 a slaty COID. wODI llpD BUILDING 300 D EXISTING PARKING = 499 SPACES PHASE•1 THEATRE DEMOLITION = 15,263 S.F. STALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED = 213 SPACES PHASE•2 TOFU HOUSE DEMOLITION = 2,650 S.F. STALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED = 107 SPACES D ~ ~ a 0 0 ~. a 0 I D we alatr CONC. !DIX nn01D t00w1 F BUILDING 100 i _ ~~~. ;•f . -J ~rr7~TT~ LEGEND N~y,T~ir~U OElId15N (E) SInUCTAE Nf11AND CONQIEIE SLA& SEE CFNWN I ..nn JI IaTE c RElD1E DOSRNC AlIIALT, 90EWY1f, CUw, PIADNC TAT 1IC1115, YO UlDSClPNO w1XN 1NE 91AOFD AREA AND AS AEOUYED m ACCdIY00A1E NEW CONSIAUCnON ANO 97E Yaw4 SFE F1AOR PLAIT FOII E%1FN1 DF IEW Cp1EIwICn011. eenicie Ollin: g seo Plra slne t,Sle sloe p 9enl Dle, CA 11 670 Tel: (707(716. 0601 VellElo O111u: ele uenn s(n el VeTlelo, CA 916ee Tei: (TIT)66e• 1111 erc~ercincuchllect e.con Z ~ I 0 m ¢ ~ W 0 ~ W c~ ~ ~ ; Q Z Z U / ~- F- W W Z g ~ v LL g Z ~ I- ~ 9 J= r a N m N N U e w i F I DATE: ~~.Q] 4 REV. N0. REV. DATE 03-19-08 w DEMOLITION 9 MASTER ~ SITE PLAN N I SD -1 ~ ~B No•: SHP03 ~~ ~~ < ;;~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~a m ~~ m ~ ~ ~ z O ~ ~ ~ m ~ _ to g n > ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ €~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ z •_ ) m a ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ m ~€ °~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ Z ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ Z 0 ~p ~~ pyy n ~~~3 ^3 ~~~ ~ m ~~~ ~ z ~~~ ~ v ~€~ v '~ s ~, ~~~ ~ ~~~ o N vv~ Zoe J ~ ; 0 rm ~ N _ ~ ~ ~ O i ~ o0 V °w ~ Z o ~ b IVIOII NNE NE Q IIfI gUNl10 NN R7fA AlN6 N IF5 111L'm A A N NlO ll f1Yd N4 N g9 AtlMH`~IH .,o O D I= r D ~ ~ O m v ao m m ~ o O m ~ ~ -i O p r Z 2 m v u u N ~ j W N ~ w m . _ti <N.<tiN,Wm BUILDING ALTERATION e: e N.>~,_ .' 24 HOUR FITNESS v"~ ~ ±°~ o 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. - H ~ ~ s CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 3 _~ NAl4NN11 r MR YTIA. N NNIE O N INN, 6 NNNNN0. M A OMM6 MN NffOrANf61WNIN IN N]N6 OGS NN NNNWIAI N]IN6 NM I1C NC N911L NNNLI NM IIQ OMNN NN N[TG1NI6 NNNIMF NNM f1R IMDR 611[ 1091N4 6 AQ N3111CIA6 'o D y m :. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; a a 3 JSs @@Q ~ ~ ~O > ~ ~ii~ ~ Y~Bm G~ d~ S~ ~ ELI : ~ „~~. '~ d ~ ! ~~~~ ~ ~~~V 5pp ~~ o~~~~ y~ ~ ~ s R Q~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ m o ~ O ~t ~i~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~>~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n -a e~w...f ~ 1'>+~~rt ~~ ~ fP. ~, / ~ O y p p SQQ > p ~~~W Q£~ Y -I pQ~ T~~S qN~L C1yyy>~~~~1 m ~2 ~ ~=1 m m /~/ ~.. ~, ~iA ~ tl~ 0 ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~.~. j f ~.... jp H^~~'IS 'Ii wr1MY S • .... Y ~ ~ ,o y ~~'~ > ~~>~ y~~ y L ~ ~SIQ~ ~~~ '1 ~ ~ ~ Lt ~Z ~~ G>r ~~ Ai In ~ CSe a ~~^ g ~ ~ j Fl y ~ ~ ~ 6 }i 11~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ N N C7 ` w i ~ ~; .~~,r.. nrr .~. ,~.u~~ wi (_n " @= ~ ~ 1' ~y i ~ ~~~~ Fl~ ~ ~ Q~ ~~ M ~~~~~ ~~25 ~~ ~[ ~ 1qp~ ~. ~ ~ yy ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 51~~ ~ ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~7i W '~A V/ m ..z ~ I ~ ~+f ~ ~~~ ~ >~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ Ism ~ ~ 7~ A Y! Y N e A N' .+ !" N • ~ y ~ ~ ~ 388 FFy~ !¢q ~ 8` $ ~~~ 4~~ ~ 3~ S2 8 g ~"~ A~~a3~G~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ si ~ ~ ~~ ~ P~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ g N ~ ~~~~ >~»> ~ ~ O ~ z g o ~ ~ ~~ ~"~ ~~g ~~~ ~ ~ m N s ~ ~~ A ..~ o m ~ ~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I;~ ~ Z ~^ V, v ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ l;~ ~ _ ~~~ ~ - ~ ~ Q m ~ >~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ O ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~> rn rn C g ~ ~o ~ z 70 ~ ~~C~~~~ F~.~~~g~m ~~~~5y F~~C~~~Z ~~gi~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~R~ ~~~;%~ ~~~~~~ ~~q~~~ ~~~g ~~~~~~ ~~P~~,7a, ^ k ~ _ ~ O ~ ~ p p Z ~~ m ~ v ~ € ~ ~ $ $ uu p p m y = ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn g ~ g ~ g ~ ~~g~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ` rn rn ~ ~ Z ~ s ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ _ D '- >O ~ 0 ~ O m ~ _ {] p }Q~ qX_ nn ~ w~ F7.~ Qw ~~Ca~ ~ F7.~~~. ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~" ~~~ ~" > ~7~ 8>~~ ~a~ m ~~a~~C C8~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~~z v ~ r gg ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ f~ Z v ~ o ~ ~ g o o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~a s y~~~pj^ m ~o~L~~ YU4~ ~ p~~a~~~ ~~~~~ ~ss~ ~e~~ ~$~~~m G~'it ~ ~~ 7 ~o ~ § ~~..II ~~gi ~ SCRS~c ~~ ~ 2 ~ ~• ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sa Z ~ ~ ~ O SI $ ~ ~ > ~ a ~ T ( Z Z Z ; ~,[ ~ -1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" b ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y (/~myyy(0 y > W 310101 fJ+0 ~ ~~N~ ~ Q ~ j' ~bbbb~ ~ ~~T~gg n ~m~v = ~ v ~~ogom ~ Z~~~ n ~~~~ 1~ ~ ~~~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ fi ~~~-gg 'v ~ ~~~~~ ~ g ~ ~ ~~~ ~ A m o D r ~ z O D ~ z °m ~ X o . y ~m ~ ~ ~ BUILDING ALTERATION °~~o:e ~°= - a _ ~ ~ ~ °° 24 HOUR FITNESS a>~`; ~>q~ _ ~ w ~ ~ ~ 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. _ _ ~~ N CUPERTI NO, CALIFORNIA 3 ~ maurt was ~ v atz wuaoc xw aem ualw a w mcm a n <wla n ana ac 1a w a xr nE warm ~c-uf a ~acana a rr anm ~ ~ a N rwrt n aoam n~ a a.. e .e ~.......~....~ ~.e,.......~ a..... ~...~ _..._. ~ ~... _..._ _. _- _.~ ._ - .__ __ __ __.. _.. _ ooooaooooo0000 ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~4~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ;~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z m m z gkw u y 3 ~~ II y$ 3 a ~ 7R~Q at~~ ~~ ~ L ~~ ~ 34~ n ~ ~ Rp r7f~ K~ c f~ ~1~{ ~~~ ~~ 8 $ ~j yss y IIIU ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Q Q A ~~ /\ m ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~s ~~ z m ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~y+g~~ ~ l~ ~p`~g~~I' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ z O ~~ j "-~ ~! ~ ~ aZ ~ Q~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~o ~ ~{~t £ ~ ~ I)~ ~~ ~~ m(j m ~m~ Cy ~ 4~ $a p I N M n n '~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~v P ~~ ~ ~ e 8 ~o o a ~~ Z O O _ ~ ~ o ~ °° ° Z V w Maas aAa fie w: 6 aFI a~lm An aea urroa R a AaCkn A M ao ~ w nioA.' ~ f 91C A I I I I I 1 I I Lr I I I I I I I I o-- - I I I I 1 I I I I I I - I I I I I I I ~~ o- - U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I _ 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 _ I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 _____ -~ -~ _ V V _ _ I I --+----~ I I I I I I I I I _~-__ V u it I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ~ I _ I I I 1 I I I I I i I I I -~ I 1 I ' ---0 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I j I _ _ V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~/^`/ I _ _ V I ~ I I I I I I I I ___T v I I I I I I .;:a : ~m.>. m BUILDING ALTERATION ° -~: = --_ . 24 HOUR FITNESS N>~ =:>= _ 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. = ~ N~«~ + CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ 3 Aaea n xa A.nia. w w[ a x rart, a nAalm. Ali A alrtl a Mo 9NfaAaS aololC ru amS oat 11a Maeanal Iowa aM w: rc yew maw;r aA t18 aanA x _ o xaratva maAa[ rlaa na trcoR a M ,~rxla: a rlaa aAaclm < lI^YcJ Qi ~ Qy p 9 I I I I I I I I I 0~0~~~ ;i~~~~~ I~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~@ ~~~ ~~_ o 2 m m -~ z O m m Z m r Z O -~ m ~ o ~ o a 0 0 _ ~ ~ ~° w N g b O ~~ ~O §~ Z I I I I W I I I -~--I- -~--- BUILDING ALTERATION ®=e:= ~__- 24 HOUR FITNESS =o~~= a>«~:>=~ 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. N ~ m ~ o CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ 3 60 90~ 196 N11Oi ML EBOM1 RC MO IfUWT01 RYNO ~M MC MG MMl 1YRC! ~M IIQ tlMM16 NO _ 901GT06 WSIIM[ AM MQ flVIC 6 _~ _~ ---~ -- ---~ ---0 ---~ ---~ -~ ---~ ---~ ---0 ---~ - - -~ 3.1 / SIONAGE BY OTHERS ~ i P 0 S T U V ~ J /~ TQ PARAIEf PNTCx Rp a• MATCH (E) PITCH (()) ~ ~ ~ N ~ I ~ A-4 I ` 61NG w/ 15/ IDC. $I t ~ . ~ PAPER- ID ... ---::. ... TO MATCH (E) I . •/-s I ~ .~_ i SIGNAGE TI590~ E) ~T11NEG a t7 ~, ~~~' B4nIDIY OIIIEP: .....: =_-:-iiii-:: ~D ~~ , ~.,.... S!0 Plat Blrn,t, 61. BZB, /-BV . n' TDP OF BY. . '~, VUldo 01}len: . 8'-0' T.O.C. .......... ................. i ' 816 YLrln Slrnt YATCH (E) HT ~-_ ~ -_ - ~ ~~ -: ~'-'--'~ - - it .:~- .:.... ~~:_ "-:~ GUTTER k FASCIA TO i 17 2 VUU(D, CA BIS60 Td: (761)666.1111 i ~ ' ~: I ill _~ ~ = i AIL I. ANDHE(CHT ET me uclnurch114DU.oom 1J` - . ----- - - - -- - - - _. i F.F. '. :I LI ~ --~ - .. _...._....... ~ _ ..._ --- --- ---- - ---- _......._ .................................. ' = - - Et Q GAS METER T ~ I I ELECTRICAL SNITCH CEAR I i ~ FlRE PoSER ((PAINT TD MATCH 7~DJACENT SIDING) - ~ ---- :~ ~ 1 '; ~, i~ O m Q ~- Y z r ~ L I ~ I ~~ ~ W o WEST ELEVATION i ~, I '° I ! W ~ U ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ I I 14 QZZU ~ ~ B ~ 1 S ~ ~I O / A~Y,L Rp0J1N u/1n/ iELT~O/ t/I' mN PLWOBD _ ~ ~ B i' LL I Z ' ~ L 90IN4 M/ YP 59115 (D P[R eAq uP rAU m Ao1L5c s M is ROOF PITai ''~. ' 4 ' /^~ r V ~ V/ Li. Q Iq i ~ xm'. w z4' ac i ~ V m ~ N N mM PASaA--~ ,r n-n woso sEMw Tw'. i to smmta~w t0 ' m REYAM is r- '' ` ,t I ~ ', I - awc MIB ro REI/Nl .......__.....,,_........ .... 13 ~A ~FE ggiPgg 1Y (iROY q(01111TY twN S = I -_.~............__ _.. -- ....................... L - - - -) SFF SIINCiIMAI SECROXS (E) UTILITIES * ENCLOSURE ~ ~ TEMP WALL SECTION _ . ~ ~ scalE:112'=ra scAlE:lrr=ra SHEET NOTES GENERAL NOTES oaTE. 8-7-07 O E%iEI W U1pX • 1EIPOR/AY wATFRPADDf FNaDMIAE Fdl (E) U1111E3 (CAS t FIECIRIC) Irv. No. REV. DATE . BMI YATEAYL 91AE1 W191 F703INC NOMLCIITAI MOOD 16 N-15 GATT P I 9MMC 01'EN IB BUCOINC PIPER - m BE USfD wri tl[T CAN 9E RELOCATED. . B 6 Iq RDaMC AxD fRA11MC m REEINx. n 7A ria MOaows Dom. tD ac) 3 CSY FL1WwiG CAP AT PAAA^Ei wl/l. 4 (x) a,w snro5 w te' ac, ssD. s Iq wAU m REwAa 6 PLTw00D 31EAlIM6 ~/ STEM NAIUIIC PER SRSICDMAL ENCR Y~ ROOMC - 11PE AIO CQW m WICX (q ELEVATIONS 8 QB xTli a muxM ro YATCII (E) WALL SECTIONS 06 PoeYEO caNa6T6 callwx m wTa (E} tD m sAe ro REYUs tt ~ 1Z MILT UP ROOHNC Ai PMAPFT. A-3 TJ (N) N01NC PEII SIRU(:R1RIl. 14 (N) ROOF FRAYMG PfR 41RUC1URIL PAMi m YA1CN F705TY1D. t5 p) mxc sDEwAEY (YAT01 (q)/sEaPE ax ma wAU. JOB NO.: SHP03 RD1E IAeDMOS 81W1 eF IFS IXAN t~-0' NMf IM POSIS ilel NOelf r-1' b+' YKt D/P 9A R r IA0 eoETS, usE AYDIpI eats Ar au WNIS tt. YATa Y1ssIDR Aa0ip0 m_wta Ef stnc ,wD I t7 Ol4A PLiM00DmBSNEAl 1 0 11 PEx stwtcnnu CYa. (ql 091 PMAPET CAP L Yi!'al/d HNi PUIF 9LPE~ MFIDFD TD SIEF1 RAIS M~ As RE9eAFD 7%10 FASCU TRM m YATa t7DSRY0 T W/ NEW 7x ROOf PRA4Y6 PAN Pa stRUCtuSx da P1110 ~ SIFa RVMOa 'P4F' eF7D m 0.45 7X NASFR OR BIOD(m pEATE PARAPET iXlp(N65 ~ } ....... ...... ~ II RIAIIIC EAa 90E wrR eEOaac AT cauux m YATCII 0 0 519E eRAOaIF AT HORBdITAL Se1Wi m wra YATa (Et I .. CY1911a ' 6'd a0 4Aa EYSRNC 01flt 1y eUlON6 PARR OAOI R1W000 .. ....... .... 91UTYINO RR 51WC111RAL EY9REF11 _ Benleh Olflee: ELEVATION '/e'°' ~6 e45 i 580 Fint Slnet, Ste. B201 RYWOO 91FA1XYQ SSD PCRYm w1cRCrt 8enicle, CA BI570 E YJe/~57 Sim COIWw m YA1CY (E) iel: (70T(7A5.Ofi02 E eaten ro PLacR ~~cwc m wra ~~ Vlllelo Of11ce: i 818 Yaln Street Ydle(o, CA BISBO '~, id: (101(558.1111 ', D/e' 9A FAQ MIOYA ear IrcmereincuchlUete.cem BASE 10 n ROOF ACCESS LADD ER PARAPET DETAIL EAVE DETAIL Z J ~ SCALE: 1112' =1'-0' J1F-UDDER 4 ' ' ' ~ o 1• ' ' SCALE:1112 =1 $ U xT-PARAPET =1 -0 ~%T-GK O m Q W0 LL • aw 75 FAA4N0 RR STRUCnnAE ~~ ~ m w ~ J W c~V e cAxr stRe ~YO Po2aTAl eWD SO 110 o 4R L r U) aa1 ROOF m 1eALL RA9w1c O111ED AE w uemER s! uSnNB PARR ~ ~µ J W N Q U ~ S , Z ~ a91 PI/SNwO AS AEOARED ~ ~ O Ym~wipl SIYIE wa ~~ e . 1: wut9lc ~ ~ W Z CaOR a r Dv7R Rre000 RWC ;' PFR stRUenRUE EYCR '^. .._...i------.. . ~ ~ ..................... Z ~ ~ _ Q ] jVVV^~~I 7A Pwilxc m wia J O w ~~ ~ ? ~ ~ j YEW caaatE 9TE154A PER / /~ W N N U j" 7 . e eloaaec xm1- Y~ 7fi SIAUCNAALw6411EfR W~ RR 9MPSa NN19I1 tEW CON(IE1E POO1110 RR S1RUC111RAL O101EF11 - L~/M eB'O.C„SAD. ~ 11 Q ~ONNECTION AT ROOF DETAIL FOOTING DETAIL '; v ~ SCALE: t trz' = t'-0' ~1n-RV-To-wAU 2 3CAl E: P • t'-0' ~E'Ar~DOnNC e BuLT_Bp ROOFlNC RA9HC STSIFY '; ! I (SIERE OCDIRS Ai FA1awR DOORS) II i OBL 7A IFAOER • ceEV. 91sT YEru 9u RA9eRC i ~ ~ (etR:RE OCQIRS AT IX1EIe0R OOOIB) OAS 8'7-07 C I , saEAxr Ato eAa¢R ROD HEAD ~---~ 9w As RE011wm ~v. ~ ~. ~~ IIOII.OW YETAL ODOR, SEE DOOR SOIFdRE B RE 9xaF RAear xala YETAL `RAYS i JAMBiSILL ' PROWOE J AxaaRS PER JYR ~ ~ SFAUNi /wD eAOFW ROD a9 ^ ~ _ :v. ~ DETAILS CALV. 91FET YETAI 9LL PIA91110 ~.~ r' (w1DIE axuRS AT E%IDpp1 ODORS) Ow6lF is PUTS soar-uv aaaRlc PlA91N0 sisrtw (woa oaaMts At ExrEnm DoDRS) ~ . ~ 2 9 n ACCESS DOOR V SGALE 3' ' : =T-0 ,1F-ACCESS-DR-BUR ~~•~ SHP03 B 7 a .a o, °t, ro w A ~ 1 a lsoea Ro79aOllVatlxmO®IRES 186X11019 R11[ aaR R11 IOfpNE T a M rmpw"O' 1111E NVa1 M oar xf1aM1 a411wD r oallNr[ flaF11a a Ex1x Naew NqN, NMpa M MNAIrE aaPMa lRQ NS Wa-IfrFl1 alm E"laxa 1r. TAL AT ~gI,c11y a axes Ao101o1a w1w aEmrt raaxl /wNp T.a AIL uatmaeu-1u~s u AwxLr m~nerz » a,aLa umort na na a w ~wnm) attnm 1o arnorc nmla a Emn s11m a mewE rn seE xE1ea raw. ~x4r1°'' «) wnars wan ra eta a a (wm» aNnNana a veE /1)'9~ s~ s m Darr °~ u omlec rm' e) uuaws Iew1s ra aw a m fmm~v) rmrm xr mmeec Lwaa a slE n1r 1m u . sye .ArIE aA rta aura axu axaE sa R r4: oar e) Nom w InLnss EArpr Ia Ira a 1RS lnaaol qY, Rv a Swrur IxoLL gy R ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ » rNN[ umr ra wr a r plran) 5,59 av rar-wura r1r a av rr m'~iuoa~ea wo~i1 a ne walc~r E~arr~ n ~n °in~"e~wola as nr ~NRU1R1r aweanal ~1~ a4r. nE rart a amv a sw unno anal E xaplxm S6 OLY ancmr aox xNE ~ A rpla raE M as wsara n M aY 6 rt • r rrsa lomor • mmurx n[ Rar urn runar °~P01N'0 NL mp EAWAF1pr9 rmm EaNp IIa11aNS and nE n[a9a K llfl' UinnGSP'r IaRO lalw MfME EgRRWIR a lLn/Mxl EEaalRaw 1M6f OIIEIIxE wor. M 11116'IrRN pal .4W wVr.NY ELI aE1p-0n ~gPanx4G IIIk EFSI-rlb ® Rwr swoxr Ela NINaL m laol)-m-uol r wmlw NIIF.//r4apaax4aN j~jlEfiC r wm Na9r ra1L P 01fa411aL xAllm EMIala11 a NNn uaAC rues p0 pv wwR xsE Enos RLA w RNrxL loan NE Ern u minl Rnlx un, u wgrl a fl.Ylpa alYxal IEnp RIE rum NM EaIW M NROIt al ruaa REgpmall: R[nrrMn I ra E EAn « 1 a pal a ruE n rnA auu ~ ma lrammrt. aal noa lEA x~ar~wars uaoanE GBAPkQC 3CALE anx 1 RR ~ x n. aou RLOI uu ~aqImmRe! rtAreENraelXlgRaEenw • • rIT""6sTOa w laatml a Nn amwn msnn, ro4s uva ex~~ mLaru~ Non a nls axvET voc arLpm a w E,m1 a AvaaA11E n xabl0u nxu xx[ r~ Eaoos rt >E m a aR aauEpE nRE uc la Dana urwrm, w mru. Hess 1 E rx!) aROr Ar aa"N a laf 9ANLT. IIE mnRala RLYL uamNrl 111E 11X[ 1 bd . x a, lWrpl a ur ammxr arL11aS w Rp11 E R[Ea6xE M NRP[[ m ur nwuc a mart urslrm, oar a 1m aaw» N]Ea P{ ~. ... R=542.00' ~=83'05'92" L=586.89' q1 4 A a. ~~ O a `VL~ bN a p0~ AA lD v C ~~~ "v A VI ~ S R=100.00' X88'48'18" L=120.09' - FLOOD NOTE: a p.r NNap ~ xN rwrlr N N r..(•) a M Rx1 Nr•xw N611w arlalaa'rJ'r..1 N• _ Ir• N •IwIM W x Y Hal F a Yank fwl NM MA b YN"Arr mt b tlx N•11"Ir n••1 Nwm Py"n 10.0 ea» . n.. NamM w narnr ti waver wlxr•N n rapes. w r ..wAp .. rx"a•1 N a".xw w ar rN w a .""'arsrLVlw"'i Rr r"I'rrae al"~r~~w"y.n~1 ~ ° ~ INILOBO/Igl ~/ tar a aROnla) EA'. xgR11T 8TM1m x M a1T a or9111q alum 6 Iwn axLA n1E a aVrarlA aaa~ u rwar xL a rum I (aq u war a x•r max rum Nu Era® wawrr n, Nn x eoa s a N.VA Ar PAE a, suns aw asxn EaRms k 6SITE DRnaa Hama ae ulaaanw a1a Iw1R5 auRO n 7Y naa7as EwaEllr aaalena n ,E a1r a aRU1xa n ' laxlon arm AwrRr x 1m R6a10eD alnl n, nn x xr Iwo a amaL EiW1, ruE Nw. nE uoa Esa® xalan a n¢ swR u maim x nc rs N~"mw""i1u 1'xwiiiw¢oswn.~~11'~n /'I IDCD TI NI (1 NL NFApIBld15 ww Enw x rlRaax I@ROalr M 6rAYNO1 Les rlnE p11En ~a n 'rl/. Y w7A ML IalYw CM1rN aamrr, LLa taa MLL rAa911T, w am xa1Cw11111E xaRN1¢ asww ra a x agar nxr au Na a NAr w nF arwr a 11101 li 6 MEN EE YI-E M AC~NIE xM 11[ TNEx anu EaRfllFlllf 6fNnm w ua'IFa pr uq/Im1 Lva aRE lE4rS,' JOIf4T MOU16 Raw 3 4 A 4 4 i1N) rfxl 4 / a rNIE'A' aaltDr, w RRRNn a M rMllaor mows u uaaa m an Aa w x mEC1 a 1E wrt 6 a6 mlalAlal a w awn p.InEl'. arm 11-YwJx Nlx C lOrEll LS 4X7 nArt a auawA / ~/ MAR (PUBl1C R/W VARIES) n n Y AVENUE !' wear BA575 OF BEARINGS m^ sesYrsst e7 r7 U a ~ ~ . S89'f1'S5`E u°rTMni ' ~ Z o ` ~~ 37 S89'1f'S5"E 169.68' ' ~ © ' " - Q c7 ~ ~ ~ D=90'00 00 ' ~ - ~ ~,p ~~~ L=499.82 Z 8 i 1. ..qq,, 'N"hT/a'b J ~ 6 S ,~ ~ ~'; ' " '4r a ~~ ~ w i 05 E ~ X00'48 as '~~s Z °~ n / / 0 # Q Z > a s1a m~ a~ CONC. 00EWUl( EDCE Di ROOp O1£NXU1G zs, ,a' M1. W ~ ~ ~ ~ Z W ~ m ~ a W ~L & ~ . ~,~ ,~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ 1d ~ aNE sroRr 8 ~ d CONC BLOCK BXIOMC Q $ o ~ y q ~0 ff, TL O Q = r ~1 19787 50. Fr. ~ 7. p 7.t' a o Nan cant ~ ~ ONE STORY ca+c etoa eulnlNC Q ~(, a o q ~ L,L ~ ~a. g J (~ g n a a ' REruXNC wAU pL ~ 71.6• IxiFA 7.o77e e 6 ~ 0 ~ 7 ~o o ~y ~ P~~ .P 'C ~ 741.7r Q q ~ A Gq ~ w.7 q0 0 ¢W EOCE aF ROCi 01EANU10 n ~ D q Otl ~ B 7 axl ARCADE nAxtol ' ARCADE „^~, 01 ~ a 1Bf.71 FA a L a Nu1Fx I~ 58.00' o p ~ssCO O T 3 $ 8 '~, III L.u ~ ~ WE SiXiY R 41.74' 4131' 61.77' ~ ~ U coNa azoac alnlnac m77 sr ~ < a ONE STORY a = ~ 8 Ri ~ LL 1e1.4s' $ CONC Bllla( BUILgNC ~ j oe/e s $ srtv >~ > EDGE OVERIIMIC r n ~ w ' UP ~ ~ 7 V 1 i cat ~EwAix d a 141AY ~~~ ®0 9 U v I w ~ UO CONC SDEWAt1I ~ 8 = ' ONE STORY 0IX BURDINO Q I i ARBA=952,884 SQ.FT. (8.fO1 ACRES) ,~~~a a `a' ~ ~ g ~ \ WJ Z Q og l ® 81.77 \ 1R~¢ Q47' 70.0' ~ ` Q I~ (=r1 Q ~ ~N ~-`~ VIZ CONC. O ~ ~ Q loll oa °j J o ,v' ~ a e,3r b y Q ~ a"" ~. ~. ~ Z Z pEANTER >> 9~ `> To. ~ F - pLWTEA -- -- vAUlr I ~ a p 9 J a ~ ~ 0 ~ b 61 bb A E ~Y~ & X89'15'40"ll 572.45' ` ~ ~ 44.85' 5 b5 ~ ~ X84"09'28°~- f ' ~~ ~ ~~1 g X89'15'40"lI s i c 39.s3 (120' PUBLIC R/W VARIES) ~ a : rn ~,.~ STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD N ~ ~ ~ 0 ~f €€~'. A ovr runiurrer CUPERTINO OAKS PHASE1IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CUPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SHEET INDEX ,qy ~ $~ i '~ waae~, x ~ ~ ~ p~ ppt ;~- y~ ~i 4 :~maea ~. arw«,SI awvw 1~C i _ ~~,a,vw~~ nr., aYai~+ r~ : k ~ ~ Y ~ r n '` ;, . owe ~ M ~ Aw~p~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ 4 ~ am @ a :~ .v„~„w as ~- l . ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ,ypi, l..r f: ~ ~ Auwa,.-- L # G .~. - tbA A.,,~ ~' ;; i . t ~ l ~~ Y °' ? $ is a._ ~ s r,B rat a+a ~ 1 ~_ ~~ ar q°A4, f r~i € ;yi ...{ 1 r i ~'€w+ud wow.; ~ d ; r .. ~d 7wn"'. , ~ ~.. ~ ~~.q J ,s~ r ,go?+; T[~ctiwa~ , 7 r ~•c ti: it x l pn.ga .,1 U at . I 4 [ ' ~ sanaoa VICINI~( MAPMAP N.T.S. C-1 TITLE SHEET C-2 GENERAL NOTES C-3 NOTES AND LEGEND C-4 E%IS11NG CONDITIONS C-5 DEMOLITION PLAN C-6 GRADING PLAN C-7 U1ILITY PLAN C-8 DETAILS PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PROJECT CALLS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 121 UNIT NOTEL, SURFACE AND UTILITY IMPR0I~EMEMS YATHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PHASE 1. 1. All vgdc perkumed shell be irWafled to manufecwrers spedfiwtiais end all xork shell comply with all wrteM local, state and fedBrel regdrertnnts. 2. All wok shell he mnshtrged h ecoordanca w9h Mere plans and the Standard Spedfiwtions d the Cupertino Senkary District 3. All eswvetion end beckfiNng wiMin ahBel dghsd-way shall be done in ecoordance with trn requirements d the En~neer d Ma pudk egerxy having Judadiction. EmoachmeM Permfls shall be obtained and a copy shell ba on do job dudnp cmelnssbn. 4. FIq mebrpl shell he compacted to a mintmren d loo end are heN (2.5) feet above the Wp d pipe elevation M methods Met wfll not damage the pipe a sutntlbaed wiM gravel or one (1) stony ma. FN malenal cord adain a minmum of ninahy five pemeM (95%) relative compaction, as px Sloe ct CalNornte StaMaM Spedfiwtioris. 5. The District Endnex shell be no8il'ed two (21 woddno devs In advance d atertirn constmglon on Mis ordect. 20833 Skvern Creek Bhd. Suite 104, Cupetino, CA 95014 (408) 253.7071. At that tlme, trelfic plans, encroechmant pemids end On sewer drvereion plane shall be even m do Distdd Engineer. Serer diversion plans shell hictitle sewage bypass erd emergency pgna. Work shell not begin anti the District Engieer has provided wdken acceptance q Mesa p%na. 6. Ona (1J serdlary sewer lateral ahdi bB hnlalbd hw each lot a buflding. Location M lalerel and property comers to be staked In flees at Me same tlma the sewer mein o staked fa corrsWction. laterals Shall nd be Wid on less then two perwnt (2%) grade end eheti have a minimum rover of four end ors: hell (4.5) kM q pnperty tine a edge d sen0ery sewer easement. LetereB shell 6e deeper Man lea and ono heft (4.5) feet when dkected 6y Distrkt Engineer. La>erek shall Mt l1B B%IBMBd I'IByald the etre8t dgMawey IInB Or 78nflary 7eNer e8sarneM tiro OMR MB meln h8a been tesbd. Lateral severs coneouded outside d Ma pubk soap a Cupertino Sanitary Diaofd EeeemeM shell be conatrucled in accordanw with Me reglromaMS d, and shall be hnpec4d by Me Clly q Cupertlno Bulktirg DepeAnnnt. 7 The Caarecbr pedomtirp wok On the senkary sewers shell be requlrad to replster w1M the Dieldq and provide Inaurenw as apecMbd H Sedbna 1a9 ant 140 of Me DWdcYs Slandertl Spedficabons. 8. The Oevelaper end Gernrsl Contrecbr shall ba responsible fa prOteclnn d all e>a7tinp improvertnnte I~u6ng mtisOng aenflary sewer fadNliec Chet are b remain ant q damaged duup consWdkm d the proposed ImprovemBMS, shag be rapelred to dra wtlgadbn dMe Cupertiro Sanitary DisMd and other efledad agendas. 9. Chenne4 d ell Dietdd manholes wkNn Me cornhuctlon arse sheN be protected by Dlywood covers, plawd in the manlales end maM10b w8fllp6 abed be adjusted b final gads In aCWfdBnw w11h MB StendeM SpBdflratiOn6 Of Itn Gtrpertlln SaMary Dietrkt a m directed by the Distdd ErpMew. 10. The Dweloper end Oernret Coriaada shell be reepaol6le la the preveMbn ct doratruction dabds entednp Me ex4tlrg sanitary sewer system due N the construction edhitie6 associeled wgh Mis project end the DeV810per and CoMrectorehell pay ad coals msaaeted wflh the release d consorction debis info the exlating 7eNMry aevnr system due to On corwtrtpllon activities amodehd wtlh INs project. 11. The Devebper end General Contractor 7hefl 6e reeDawPole for Me prevention d e saxege spYl essocteMd Me Contrectare BOhVdlq pl nth Droleq end Me DBVebper end DOntrscta Shell pay afl aosb assode0ed wtlh tln released 6BWagB IMO solace deinege system ens dawm7treem sorrow waters. 12. Utlfly lktlflwtlon (Cadrsda shop Icrate ar uflfities prior to start d eawvetbn): e. UndagroundSealwAlertS00.227.2500 b. SNrtn Drains Cky dCupertiw a Sm0ery Sewers CupeMra Senflery Dbtdq 13. NI SeMlary Sewer Peas shell ba PVOSDR26 aapproved equal, unless dher4se spettlled by the Dlafrkd Engineer. 14. Aewse for pedestriarn and vehicles shell be provided al all ttines unless approved In writhlg by Me Dlshiq Fsg6eer. Approval d tlnee plane by Cupertino Senttery DisMet does not relieve the hntaller d tin resporel6ilky fa the conec0on d nistakes, arras, a omksbw, ti, during the Douse d consfrudbn d Me eanflary sewers the pudic interest requhes a modification d, or a deperWre from the DiaMct SpedflcaVars a these IrtprovemeM plare, Me District Erglneer abet have Me edhorily W require sash modfiwtiais ar deparwre end to epedry do manner in which Me modifications or departure is b be don, Approved ,2004 CUPERTINO SANRARY DISTRICT Duok1 Ergineer /~ Y 0 ,ie ~ .~+ Jun 04 A < pY ,jr v < pp G <OP „o[l l,n &W~~g a~~$~ W~ m~ ~~ ~:~ Q Z O J Q U Q } Q~W~ ~WN° ZNWQ HQF~ wa~~ Q a Z /~ N V 0 z F tt w a U t~~~ c-~ a 0 BKF ENGINEERS CAUTION: 1. THE LOCATIONS, pffS MD/OR DEPTHS OF E%ISRNG UNDERCRWHI URU11E5 AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTUNEO FROM SWRCES OF VARYING REIJABNtt. ME CONTRACTOR I$ CAUTIONED THAT ONLY ACNAL IXCAVARON WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERCRWNO URURES. (A RUSONMLE EFFORT HAS BETH MADE TO LOCATE AND DEIJNEATE ALL KNOWN UNOERCRWND URURES). CONTRACTOR SHALL YIIBFY LOCATION AND DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY IXCAVARON OR IMPROVEMENT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALLL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERWCE ALERT FOR LOCAiIpI aF UNDERGROUND UTILIRES AT LEAST 48 HWRS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCRON -PHONE (800) 642-2444. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ElOSTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGNNING ANY WY1RK ON THIS 9TE J. CONTRACTOR SHALL RENEW THE RECORD DOWMENTS Fpl THE E10511NG BUILDINGS (DAAIWNGS ARE AVaLABLE AT THE PUBLIC MORI(S DEPT.) FCR ADDITIONAL UNOEAGRWND CONDIRONS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT ALREADY BE SHOWN ON THESE DOWMENTS PMOR TO COMMENGNG 'MTH UNDERCWRNO, GRADING OR FOUNDATION NDNK. 4. THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR MEANS, MEHODS OR PROCESSES THAT MAY BE ASSOCIATED 1WTH ANY TOXIC 5045 IF FWND ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPIYTNG WTN ALL dtt AND CWNtt STANDARDS AND APPROPRIATE REWURWS OF TOXIC SGLS ARE ENCWNTERED. CONTRACTOR MUST NORFY THE CITY$ PROJECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY 5045 ARE EVEN SUSPECTED OF BEMG CONTAMINATED. GENERAL STTE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL WSIT THE SITE PMOR TO BIDDING ON THIS WORK AND CONSIDER 7ME EXISRNC CONDIRpIS AND SIZE CONSTRAINTS IN 1HE 861, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE IN 711E POSSESSION OF AND FAMUM WTH GTY STMDMD DEfa1S AND SPEGFlCARWS PMG2 TO SUBMITRNC OF A BID. 2 ALL WORK ONSITE AND IN THE PUBLIC MGHT-CF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO ptt STANDARD DETaLS 8 SPEGFlCARONS. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE MTH 1HE SdLS REPORT pIiEPARED BY TREADWELL AND ROLLO DRIED: 11 AUWSi 2003, PRO,A:CT ND. 3718.01 AND THE APRIL 6, 2004 LETTER TO JANE VAUpLM RTLED 'NGi1H PAOPERtt LINE AETIJNING WALL DESIGN RECOMMENDARONS' 4. PRIOR TO BEdNNINC WORK, MD AFTER INITIAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL STAKING, CONTRACTOR SHAH FlEW CHECK ALL ELEVARONS MMIfEO MiH (E) AND REPptT ANY DISCREPANpES GREATER THAT 0.05' TO p1Y5 PROEJCT ENpNEER. 5. DAMAGE TO ANY E705RNG SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITIES MD/OR SERMCES TO AEMAM SHALL BE RESPONdBRItt OF THE CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR MO/OR REFUGE N KIND. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A IRAFFlC CONTROL PUN THAT ADDRESSES 1HE N® FOR THE CONRNUWS USE OF THE STREET THRWGHWT THE DURARON OF CON57RUC1KN. 7, dWL ENGNEEA OR SGLS ENGMEFR TO RENEW ALL GRADING MD SUBMIT A FlNAL REPORT TO THE dtt PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY 8, CpIPACT10N REPORTS MO PAO ELEVATION CERRFlCATE IS REWIRED DN ALL WILGNC PAD WORK. g. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS, 773-Jf04, FOR DRANACE AND FlNAL GRADE INSPECRON, NHICH INCWDES DRAIN LINES AND ROOF IXtaNS/DOWN SPOUTS. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WST CONTROL MO NSURMG THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE WORK IS LffT IN A CLEAN CONDIRON. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RENEW STD. DETAIL 6-4 ON TREE PROTECRON PRlpl TD ACCOMPUSMNC ANY WORK OR REMOVING ANY TREES 12 UTIUff BEST MMACEMENT PRACRCES (BMP'S), A$ REWIRED BY THE STALE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD, Fpi ANY ACRWtt, WHICH GSIURBS SGL 13. ALL ROOF DRAMS AND/pl DOWNSPWTS SHALL BE DRAINED SHEET FLOW 2X AWAY FROM THE BUILDING AND MAYBE COLLECTED BY DRAINAGE INLET CONNECTED TO PUBLIC STORM DRAIN FAdUTY. IF AND ONLY IF THE DRAINAGE IS IN 1HE HIU9DE ARU CAN 1HE WATER BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN. SITE MAINTENACE: 1. CONTRACTOR TO GATHER ALL CONSTRUC110N DEBRIS ON A REGULM BASIS MO PUCE IT IN A DUMPSTER OR OTHER CONTAMER WHICH IS EMPRED OR REMOVED W A REWUR BASIS WHEN APPROPRIATE, USE TARPS ON THE GOURND TO COLLECT FALLEN DEEMS OR SPUTTERS THAT COULD CONTRBUTE TO STORM WATER RUNOFF POLLU110N. 2 CONTRACTOR TO SWEEP OR VACUUM THE STREET PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS ADJGNING THE PROJECT SIZE MD 1HE DN-SIZE PAYID AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS. SCRME CAKED-ON MUB MD DIRT FRpA THESE MUS BEFORE SWEEPMG CORNEAS MD NMD TO REACH ACAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 3. CWTRACTOA TD SWEEP OR VAWUM 1HE STREET PAVEMENT MD SlWWALI(S ADJGNING THE PROJECT SITE MD THE ON-STE PAVED AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS. SCRME CANED-ON MUD MD dRT FROM THESE MEAS BEFORE SWEEPING CORNERS MD HMD TO REACH AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 4. IF THE STREETS, SIDEWALKS MD/pl PMKINC LOT ARE PRESSURE WASHED, DEBRIS MUST BE TRMPED AND CDL1ECTrD TO PREVENT ENTRY INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. NO GEMING AGENT MAY BE DISCHMCEO INTO THE STORM DRAIN. IF MY CLEMING AGENT OR DEGREASER IS USED, WASH WATER MUST BE COLLECTED MD DISCHMCEO TO THE SANITMY SEMER, SUBJECT TO THE MPROVAL OF 1HE pTYS ENpNEER OR INSPECTOR, OR OTHERYASE DISPOSED OF 1HRWd1 MPROVID DISPOSAL METHODS 5. CREATE A CONTaNEO MD COVERED AREA ON THE 517E FOR THE STORAGE W BAGS, CEMENT, PUN15, GCS, FER71UffR5, PESRGDES, OR OTHER MATERIALS USED ON THE SIZE THAT HAVE THE POTENRAL OF BEING DISCHARGED INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM THROUGH B1HER BEING WIND-BLONN OA N THE EVENT OF A MATERIAL SPILL. 6. NEVER CLLM MACHMERY, EWIPMENT OR TOOLS INTO A STREET, WTTER OR STORM d7AIN. 7, CONTRACTOR TD ENSURE THAT CEMENT TRUG:S, PAINTERS, OA STUCCO/PUSTEA FlNISHINC CONTRACTORS DO NOT DISCHARGE WASH WATER FROM EWIPMENT, TOOLS OR MNSE CONTAINERS INTO WTTERS OA DRAMS. S, THE ON-SITE STORM DRAIN FAAURES SHALL BE CLEANED A MINIMUM OF TN1CE A YEM AS FOLLAWS: IMMEDIATELY PPoOR TO OCTOBER 15Ri AND ONCE IN JMUMY. AWRONAL CLEANING MAY BE REQUIRED M FWND NECESSARY BY THE dTYS ENGMEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COSTS ASSOCATED PATH CLEANING. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DUST FROM lEAV1NC THE SITE AND ACGIMUURNG ON ADJACENT AREAS AS REWIRED IN THE DUST CONTROL NOTES ON THIS SHEET. IQ CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT SEDIMENT DEBRIS SRXiM RUN-OFF FROM LEAMNO THE pTE OR ENTERMC STORM DRAIN OR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS AS REWIRED IN THE ER090N AND SEOIMENTARON CONTROL NOTES ON THIS SHEET. 11. MNNTAIN E%IS11NG 1REES AND PLANTS THAT ARE TO REMAM AS REWIRED BY THE TREE AND PLANT PRDTECRON NOTES ON TH5 SHEET. DUST CONTROL: 1. WRIER TRUCKS SHALL BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT THE CONSTRUCRON SITE ALL PORTIONS aF THE SITE SUBJECT TO BWWING WST SHALL BE WATERED AS OFTEN 0.S DEEMm NECESSARY BY THE dtt ENGNEER MMAC-0t IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER CONTROL OF BLOWING OUST FOR THE WRARON OF THE PROJECT. 2 WATERING ASSOCATED 'aTH ON-SITE CONSTRUCRON ACRWtt SHALL TAKE PUCE BETWEQ7 THE HWRS OF 8:00 AM MD 7: D0 PM AND SHALL INCWDE AT LEAST ONE UlE-AFTERNOON WATERING TO MINIMIZE THE EFFECTS OF BLOWING DUST. 3 ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND MEDIANS SPIED OR UTTERED OUE TO THIS CONSTRUCTION ACRMTY SHALL BE CLEANED AND SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS DUPoNC THE MGRNWEFI(, OR AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE Cltt ENGINEER, TO THE SARSFACRON OF THE dTYS ENQNEER INSPECTEi. 4. WATERING ON PUBLIC STREETS DR POWER WASHING SEGMENTARON ON STREETS SHALL NOT OCWR, UNLESS CONTRACTOR CGLLECTS MO FlLTERS THE WASH WATER PRIOR TO ITS ENIEPoNG THE dTrS STORM DRNN SYSTEM. 5. ON-SIZE PAVED ACCESS ROADS, PARKING AREAS, AND STAKNG MEAS SHALL BE SWEPT ONLY 1NTH A WATEN SMEEPER. 6. ALL TRUCKS HAULING SOIL, SAND, AND OTHER LOOSE MATERIALS SHALL BE COVERED W1H TMPAWNS OR OTHER EFFECTIVE COVERS 7. THE SPEED OF ALL VEHICLES DPoMNG ON UNPAVID ROADS OR PORRONS OF RE SIZE SHALL BE LIMITED TO 15 MPH. 8. WHEEL WASHERS SHALL BE INSTALLID AND USED TO CLEAN ALL TRUCKS AND EWIPMENTS LEAWNC 1HE CONSTRUCRON 9TE IF WHEEL WASHERS CANNOT BE INSTALLED, RRES OR TRACKS aF ALL TRUp(5 AND EQUPMENT SHALL BE WASHED OFF BEFOM: LEAWNG THE CONSTRUCRON SITE EROSION 8 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: I. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE MTENOED TO PRE1fNT SEIXAIENT AND DEBRIS FROM ENTEMNC THE tlTY STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, SANTARY SEWER SYSTEM OR FROM LUMNC THE SITE. THE CWIRACTOR SHALL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FlEID TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS CONCEPT IS CARRIED W T. 2 EROSION CONTROL FEAURES MD MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED ANO OPERABLE BY OCTOBER let (OR YATHIN A PERIOD OF THREE WEIXS AFTER THE START OF CONSTRUCRON ACRMRES, F THAT START IS BETWEQI OCTOBER AND NAY) AND SHALL CONRNUE IN EFFECT UN11L ,UNE let OR UNRL INSTALLARON aF T11E PERMANENT SIZE IMPAOYEMENTS J. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE THE CONCEPTS ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, SHEET CSI, ARE SCHEMARC MINWUM REWBEMENTS, THE FULL EXTENT OF WHICH AAE TO fIE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CWTRACTOA IS RESPONSIBLE Fpi THE E%ACT DESIGN AND EXTENT OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM 50 THAT IT WORKS VATH THE CONTRACTOR'S INTENDED USE AND MANAGEMENT OF 7NE CONSTRUCRON SITE 4. ALL EROSION CWTROL FAGUTES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR A~ REPAIRED, AS REWIRm, AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY DURING THE RAINY SEASW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL FACNTIES AND MAKE NECESSARY REPORS PRIOR TO M1IGPATED STORMS AND AT RUSONABLE INTERVALS DURING STORMS OF EXTENDED DURARON. AEPNRS TO DAMAGES FAAURES SHALL BE MADE IMMEDATELY UPON dSCOVERY. 5. A$ SOON AS PRACRCAL FOLLOVANG EACH ST(NiM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY ACWMUURON GF SILT OR DEBPoS FROM THE ER0510N CONTROL SEDIMENT BASINS MD SHALL CLEAR 1HE OUTLET PIPES ff MY BLOCKAGE 6. PROMSION SHALL BE MADE TO ASSURE THAT BORROW AREAS MD STOCK PILED SDLS ARE PROTECTED FROM EROSION. 1HIS SHALL AT A NINUMUN CONSIST OF COVERING THE AAUS WITH PLASRC SHEETING. 7. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CU:MING, GRADING, OR IXCAVARON, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERRY THAT THE OWREA HAS SUBMITTED TO 1HE STALE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOT) FOR COVERAGE UNDER 1HE STATE CONSTRUCRON STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MMNTNN A COPY OF THE Nd W 1HE CONSTRUCRON SITE TAEEIPLANT PROTECTNIN NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO BEGNNING CpISTRUCRON ON SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT E%ISRNC TREES MD PUNTS DESGNATED AS TO REMAIN. 2. PROVDE 6 FORT TALL TREE PAD7ECTION FENCE W1TH DISRNCRVE NARKING NSIBLE TO CONSTRUCTION EWIPAWIJT, ENCL09NC DRW LINES OF TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. 3. WORK REWIRED WITHIN FENCE LINE SHALL BE HELD TO A MINIMUM, AVGO UNNECESSARY MOVEMENT OF HEhVY EQUIPMENT N11HIN FENCED AREA AND DO NOT PARK VEHICLES VA1H IDLE RUNNING ENGNES UNDER DRIP LME OF TREES 4. PRIOR TO REMOVNG R00T5 AND BRANCHES UACER THAN 2' N gAMETEA OF TREES OR PLMTS THAT ARE TO REMAN CONSULT WI1H THE LMDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. S ANY GRADE CHANGES CRUTER THAT 6' WITHIN THE DRIPUNE DF E%ISRNC TREES SHALL NOT BE MADE W11HWT FlRST CONSULRNG THE LMDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 6. PROTECT E%ISRNG TREES TO REMAIN FROM SPILLID CHEMICALS, FUEL dl, MOTOR d4 CASWNE AND ALL Ohll]i CHEMICALLY INJJRIWS MATERAL: AS WELL AS FRdA PUBBUNC OR CONRNUOUSLY AUNNNG WATER. SHWLD A SPILL OCCUR, STOP MOTM IN THAT MU AND CONTACT THE p7YS PROTECT MMAGER MMEDIATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MIRCATE DAMAGE FROM SPILLED MATERIAL AS HELL AS MATERIAL CLEAN UP. 7. PROVDE TEMPORARY IRMGARON TO ALL TREES ANO PUNTS THAT ARE IN OA ADJACENT TO CONSTRUCRW AREAS WHERE E10SRNG IRRIGARON SYSTEMS MAY BE AFFECTED BY TXE CONSTRUCRON, ALSO PROVIDE TEMPORARY IRRIGARON TO RELOCATED TREES 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAN AND FOR MNNTENMCE OF RELOCATED TREES STOp(PILID WRING CONSTRUCRON. CONTRACTOR W1LL BE REWIRED TO REFUGE TREES THAT DIE DUE TO UCN OF MAINTENANCE. DEMOLRION NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND d.EAALY MARK (AND THEN PRESERVE THESE MARKERS) FOR THE DURARW OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL TELEPHONE, DATA, STREET LIGHT, 9CNAL UCHT AND POWER FAAURES THAT ARE IN OR NEM THE MEA OF CONSTRUCRON. 2 CONTRACTOR'S BID IS TO MCI.UDE ALL V19BLE SURFACE AND ALL SUBSURFACE FEATURES IDENRFlED TO BE AEAIOVID OR ABANDONED N THESE DOWNENTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPOFLpBLE FOR A SIZE INSPECRON TO FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE EXTENT OF THE OFMOIJRW WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE F'OA OBTAINING ANY AND ALL PERMITS NECE55MY FOR ENCROApiMENT, GRADING, DEMOURON, AND GSP05AL OF SAID MATERIALS AS REWIRm BY PMVATE, LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS. THE CWTRACTON SHALL PAY ALL FEES ASSOCATED N1TH RTE DEMWRW NDRK. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL XAZARDd15 MATERIALS FROM THE EIDSRNC BUILDING AS IDENTIFlm IN THE SPECIFlCATIONS. WORK AND DISPOSAL SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFlCAWONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE E%EWRON, PERMITS AND FEES ASSOCATED WITH THIS WORK. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY dSPOSAL FEES. 7. BACKFWL ALL DEPRESSONS AND TRENCHES FROM DEMWRW TO THE SARSFACRON OF THE SpL ENGNEER. B. YATHM LIMITS OF WORK, REMOVE WR85, WTTERS, LANDSCAPING, pGNAOE, TREES, SHRUBS, ASPHALT, UNDQiCRWND PIPES, ETC. AS MDN;ATED ON THE diAWNCS 9. REMOVAL OF UNDSCA%NC SHALL MCWDE R0015 AND ORGANIC MATERIALS TO IEIE SARSFACRON OF THE SdLS FNGNEER. EROSION ~ SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVDE A CONSTRUCRON FENCE AROUND THE ENTIRE AREA OF DEMWRON MD CONSTRUCRON, INCWDINC ALL STApNC, STORAGE CONSTRUCRON OFFlCE ANO UYDOYM AREAS 2 FENCE LOCARON NAY BE ADJUSTED FRgA TIME TO RME AS CONSTRUCTON PROCEEDS TO EXCLUDE SOME AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCRON WORN IS NOT BEING DONE AND THE MEA IS NOT OBJECRWABLE IN WSUAL MPEARMCE 3. CONSTAUCiIW FENCE SHALL BE A MINMUM GF A 6' Hlpl GALVANIIID CHAIN LINK WTN GREEN MNDS(7tEEN FMRIC ON 1HE WTSIDE OF THE FENCE 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFUGE THE GREEN FABRIC AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR OR AT SUCH A RME AS IT BECpJES TATTERED MD UNSIGHTLY OUE TO WND OR CONSTRUCRON ACRMTY. 5. CONSTRUCRON FENCE ADDRESSED IN THESE NOTES IS ONLY Fpt MSUAL CONFORMMCE OF THIS CONSIHUCRON SITE TO THE Cltt STMDARDS CWIRACTOR MAY REWIRE ADDITIONAL FENGNC, BARRICADES OR OTHER SAFEtt DEMCES TO KEEP THE SITE SECURE Jt SAFE GRADING NOTES: 1. All PAYID AREAS ARE TO SLOPE A MINIMUM OF 1X AND MA%IMUM aF Bx ACCESSIBLE STALLS AND LOADMG ZOF8:5 ARE TO SLOPE AT A NA%IMUM OF ix AND ACCE556LE PATHWAYS ARE TO SLOPE AT A MA%IMUM OF 5X IN THE OIRECRON OF TRAVEL, AND THE SLOPE CROSSWAYS TO THE DIRECRON OF TRAVEL SHALL ~ AT A MA%IMUM OF 2X ANY AREAS ON THE SITE NOT CONFORMING TO THESE BASIC RULES WE TO IXISRNC CONGRONS di dSCREPMGES M THE DOIXIMENTS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO TFE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WI1H PUCEMENT OF ROCK BASE, FORMWORK FDA WRBS MO/OA MTWORK. 2 CONTRACTOR $XALL OEIERNINE EMTHWOM( QUANTITIES BASED ON THE TOPOpiMHIC SURVEY, THE 5dL5 INVESIIGARON MD 71E PROPOSED SURFACE MICKNESSES AND BASE THE BID ACCORDACLY. NOTE THAT A SEPARATE DEMWRW CONTRACT HAS BEEN ISSUED TO TAKE 1HE pTE FROM THE WAY IT IS AT THE RME OF THE BID TO THE CONdRONs OESCRIPBED IN THESE DOWMENTS. ANY DIFFERENCES BEIMFEN THE STATE IN WHICH THE SITE IS DEIJYERED TO 1HE CONTRACTOR AND THESE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE NOTED TO 1HE ENGINEER. 3. ALL FlLL SHALL BE COMPACTED PEA THE SGLS REPORT AND 1HE CONTRACTOR SHALLCOdiDINATE ANO COMPLY YA7H THE OWNER'S 1ESRNG AGENCY TO TAIL THE APPROPRIATE TESTS TO VDtIFY COMPACTION VALUES. 4. IMPORT SdLS SHWLD MEET THE REWIREMENTS OF THE SGLS REPORT 8 SPEGFlCARONS. 5. COORDINATE THE PUCEMENT OF ALL SLEEVES FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGARON (WATER AND CONTROL WIRING) AND SITE UGHRNC PRIOR TO THE PUCEMENT a ANY ASPHALT, BASEAOCK OR CONCRETE SURFAGNG. SEE UNOSCAPING AND SITE ELECTRICAL DRAWNCS. 6. DO NOT ADTUST GRADES ON THIS PLAN YA7HWT PRIOR XRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 7. SITE STRIPPINGS THAT CONTAIN ONLY ORGANIC MATERIAL (NO DEBRIS TRASH, BRp(EN CONC. OR ROCKS GREATER THAN i' IN GAMETER) MAY BE U5m IN LANDSCAPE AREAS E%CEPT FOR AREAS IDENRFlED AS IMPORT TOP SOIL BY 7ME LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. IXCE55 STAIPPINCS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ~9TE 8• SPOT ELEVAPdI ARE TO FlNISHED SURFACE g• TOP OF CONCRETE WRBS ARE 0.50' ABOVE TOP OF PAMNG ELEVARONS, U.N.O. 10. ROUGH GRADING TD BE MITHIN 0.1' AND FlNISH GRADES ARE TO BE WTHIN 0.(15', HOWEVER CWTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT MY MPROVEMENTS 1HAT NWl CAUSE WATER TO POND OR NOT MEET REOUREMENTS IN GRADMC NOTE /I. GENERAL UTILITY SYSTEM NOTES: 1, ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFlLIID PER THE SGLS REPORT WITH MPILOPPoATE TESTS TO VERFY COMPACTION VALUES 2 CLEAN WTS, CATCH BASINS AND AREA DRAMS ARE TO BE ACWRAIELY LOCATED BY THEIR AEUTNXJSHM TO THE BUILDING, FUTWORK, ROOF DRAINS, AND/OR CURB UYWT, NOT BY THE LENGRi OF PIPE SPECIFlED IN THE DRAWNGS (MHICH IS MPROXIMATE). 3 SEE PWMBINC DRAWINGS FOR CON7NUARON OF URURES 1W7HIN THE BUILDNG 4. ALL PROPOSED U11URE5 SHALL BE UNDERCRWND, UNLESS SPEGFlCALLY CALLID WT AS ENTERING THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. S CONTRACTOR SHALL STAIQ LOCARdI OF ABOVE GRWND URUtt EQUIPMENT (BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, ETG) AND MEET WTH dtt ENGNEER MD MiOJECT ENdNEER TO REVEYY LOCATION PRIOR TO INSTALURON. PUNNING DEPARTMENT MUST SPEdFlCALLY AGREE MTH LOCA110N PRIOR TD PROCEIDING WITH THE INSTALLARON. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AN ACWRATE COMPOSITE URUtt PUN TXAT TAKES INTO ACCWNT THE ACTUAL IDCARON OF IXISRNG URURES AS DETERMNED WPoNG THE DEMWRON WORK, THE URURES SHOWN ON THE pNL DRAWNGS, AND THE SITE POWER, CONDUITS AND LIGHTING SHOWN ON 1HE ELECTMCa. PUNS. THE FlRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM sHALL BE MCWDED A5 DESIGNED BY 1HE DEpGN/BUILD UNDERGRWND FlRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR. 7. Fdt GRAV1tt FLOW SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY (POTHGE IF NECESSARY) SIZE MATERIAL LOCARON AND DEPTH OF ALL SYSTELIS 1HAT ME TO BE CONNECTED TO OA CROSSED PRIOR TO THE TRENCHING OR INSTALLARW OF MY GRANtt FLOW SYSTEM. B CARiODIC PRDTECRON IS REWIRED ON 0.LL METAWC FlTRNCS MD ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE IN CONTACT WTH THE SGL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO Fl1LLY ENGNEER A187 INSTALL 1H15 SYSh7,1 ANO COORDINATE MODE AND TEST STARON LOCATIONS W17H GTYS PROTECT MANAGER. 9. COMPLETE SYSTEMS: ALL URUtt SYSTEMS ARE DELINEATED IN A SCHEMATIC MMNER ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROMDE ALL FlTRNCS, ACCESSORIES AND WORN NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE URUTY SYSTEM SO 1HAT IT IS NLLY FUNCTIONING FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. o ~ n ~8~ WII 9gpbm e +r 3¢I m u~i PTY°e ~~I m ~'~ !! 1I Q Z 0_ O J 6 U N Y w F H 0 Z OrZo W ZN`Q ~=WcJi wa~Z a 7 ~' t~ i 1l b C-2 2 OF O Z F 0: a U o it .~ a m + w p o. a + w N tw pN w ra .yy y 1n ~ w ~a ~~~° mz ~~~~ ~Tv ix tziQ ~i~~ ~i~~~ ~ ci ~^~ z~>E $o~ i ~ vA ~ eg~~ F Q~~' ~ zo vtL iAK{ >~~ i =fig o>~mV1 ((/n~ m~n~ ~~c~nn my iy>n y Zy O~ f>'f~ ~= m Oy a A m O m ~ >A > O O s > Z „iZ ° y0 g Cnl Z~~D jAl~l QZ ° ~~~ '~~ QQ ~ _$ $ xKl cm ~~ Q = ~~v z ° ~ c" O m 6 > eQ cm ~b o s-Ip~ ~nosz >v ~Q c ~ ~~c 9 ys gg ~ ~rgim ~ 5 s m ~o Q ?c p c y> ~ ~ ~~v-~ ~~~ m y>v s2~ ~mmg fL ~~go ~'a ~s~ c(F$~ ~Qod~ a ~~~ Fi tzC N~>E z ~' ~' S =~~0 g m~v7 C ~v~~ ~~~ ~~ a ~tiib ~4~fliN mg~gc~ ~~~ ~< D p Q Q An I pLpf~mz > ~ o >c z 1 n r m p2 ~~ yayy~ Z ~A ~ ^' ~ -i~Z w ZZ~ ~~~ ~ >>~ rqi l~IN ~ ~ > Z A < ~>~ N N>71 ~ ~'~Z~ ~~ Y~vv~vvv~~~~~ 9 ~~ ~Of~~2 ~~0=2 j>~ -Ni ~Jp ~ ~y~ ~~ pp~Q~ Tz~~ ~<~ >cu~~ Q~°~~ ~ ~mrn ~tss ~y~2C ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ '~j ~~° ~~ z~i~ ~ ~ ~ Av < °cmi r~~ tL'~ y i> c ~B bTzmt>i Kvo ~Z1~ aZ'~v Q gao ~ C~c min <Fiz C s m ~~ '~ Q ~ $ imQ~ s~Fi ~~ ~ 2 m~° ~ gg ~~z y ~Q o o~d S^IR ~~JJ~ °g ~=~nnQ~ vv oc~o Qyz 4 Z V1 Q mz ~ z m > y v c z ~j ~ ~z ° ~ K c c m N v-~ -iL '- ~ f> ~ ~~?O~ i I~I~~ ~O m~2 N ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~~NS >~~ ~C~ Q ~:U ~~ VI ~ ~Z ~ ' g ~~' !< 'fEYi ~ $~ z~r~ -i~, p~p m °, _ w ~ ~~8 : Fi' $~ m = ~ .mm ~i11 ~~ ~~ : ~~ ~~^ z ~~~p~ ~ ~18~~ ~~sz yv"~ ~{Q~oz ANZA ~ ~mtl o~ ~>~ o g a m°~ ~ ^'~~ g ~~ ~mF7 y~m N z ~g ~ ~~~~ m ~n 0 g N gZ p~O onAn toL O -11~ Dm~ z (y~ ym ,$ 8~ O ~~ Oj :6A >F3 ~n ~i 'p~~~ e>z Qy myy ~1 ~ Tv F>p0 ~ UIOr~ 2~1~ NLm Fr'~ ZpOr~ N {mf ~S !7A~ E O y2 > m m~nC 2p~tmil mmf ~=~1 IO~~ 2f ~ >K`Cm CmF AF Ann p~g o >IIII~~~~11IIL ~~_O '~I O A~ >~ !^ > ~ A~~ A pp S OA A 00~ L~ m .~ m C ZA O 'm"Q~z ~ A ~~ A°- ~AZy 17i 8~ ~_ -~ CQ < ~ sL c Fn b ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m_ m ~~g~ > ~g~ °oOg p~;~ ~~~ ~g~~ ~-+ai in umi~{ Q 8 A °F-~ F ~°czi m°g$ ~~czi W '~i ~~ ~`"~F o ~~ig Pm~~ ~~ ~ 2~ AN +I>Z ~N ~CmN ° K (/~1A pC O j(~j m p y~ y Os > Z=~~ >A~ ~ FQy~ ~my f~~1~1~ °~~ m~ 2~ N> 1S1 m ~m0 ~ I"C~ C~~ °~~ ~~~ Ay ~~~ ~2~~2 ?O~ r~ Tp ut y ~ » ~ va ~ m z °~8~ ~ Or~ L~ ^~m ~~~ ~~z~ ~p~ g~ ~< _ A°' i~•l 'J6~~ N ~7~ ±o~ ~zv ~~v am ~'F~c 4m~~8 ~~~ ~ S2 ~ s vv m o z z z N v $~Z~ ~ ~~~' ~t~ ~~ m~g~ ~o ° ~> c~ ` ~ ~ °`~ ~~> 2~3F o ~~ $> -IZm~ p~1~oc~ ~_~ ~ >oc ° °gy N~ z ~e~ ~~~O~ ~8Z ~~ c~ ~ > ~ ~p~ ~m~ g>Q~ ~z; ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ Z~o° ~~Z m m~ z < mw~ to vA~ ppy. my~ ~opyg 'y~z> cC ~ my c~~ Is ~ pN ZD ~ ~m N~N~ v ~j mz> Q S 1~1 ~~ Z~KS ~ Z f ~~ >L~ Z C 3C A ~_ O~~ ~ .V ~~ ~ ~ mfA CmA ~ 1~ N~j' ~C~~ iil ~~~ ~~ m; <$~~ ~~A~ ~ ; ~F ~~ '^ iri 4 ~Z~ ~~~^ ~~> g~ : m~~" ~ cmgz L7'~e P{' Z >>~~ g io~ ~~ ~~ ~A~g $~~~ ~~ $$ bg M ~ ~~KI G~ g~= ~~P ~_~ ~~ ~~8g b~'°~~~ goo; ~~g~ ~'~ o S~ y-~~'Ld m>y° F ~~ ~I~^s ~i mLn~ r~~ f -~~p~ i ~mF ~~g~ m ~ L ~~ ,t3 ~fn r"iN r~i m > ~b~ t~~ m fF1tF o~ g ~o~Z m F ~ ~ m ' Y N u {.~ , m L ~Q ~p ~~~ _ ~c~m A ~ 1 ~ ~q~ pNLimA~ o~ ~ coF vl+l mFl D ~~ S ~l`= m SEAL cA z a jPf F°~tQ DSO ~ms ~ gZ ~ ~§^ ~ og Y czimi~#Z 1~i ~5 5 5 B~ ~' ~~~ ~~ ~ N~~I ~~ 4~ RI °j~~=g ~ ~~$c3i s Q~ ~ ~ ~~ ~D=~y ~>zv ~ $G$4 g~ ~m y g~~ ~~~~~ M o ~ ~ ~~ ~t~4 g~ ~ ~;~ Qix ~nm ~ m ~~ ~m°~ °~ o~g #~~ ~#~~ m ~ ~ g z~Q~ ~ s~~ 6 x C O ° x ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ (p~ N~iy~ ~n Z+y' ~ m ~m~i N ..~~c ~n o~ a Z ~~~~ ~ ~ g N~ Z ~~~ l~7 N _~ ~nKg~ rn ~ oT~ ° F°~ m e ~~ ~~~~ ~ o om = sm o iA ~ z i ~ '4' ~ i ~ F' ~ SQ~~ b O N~ ~ ~ ~ ~[~ ~ 'T Z O tl .9p C I I I I I I( I I I I I m L S ~' f 0 0 0 m q^ ®~ ~~ g o( I l l l l l l ~ ~ l l ~ l o ~ o IIIIAp_~yIIII~~IyI_I~I N ~ ~ ~ ~ A IQ ~ m F ~j G ~ yj ~ ~ O IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~ A ~ ~ i m > 1~1 ,~ > ~ s g ,,05{ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ i s O ~ ~ Z VI K ~ g ~ m ~ ~ j ~ C~ ~ r~~l ~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~C Z ~ ° ~ °~y g ~ ~{n Z Sf1 ~ ~ c ~' g ~ -21 ~j ~> m G n Z m K C D ~~ n p ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ y R ¢2 I~vJ" !~1 1~Y7! Z 11:1 m 22 T Sv pp~ m S T ~> 2 x O Z y~ O = r> < ~ 9 m ~m~~~~~~~~~m~~p~~~~~~Q~~~~'~~S~~~o=g~~~~ ~ix~iQiQi~ioo ~8"'BKI~~ i~ z~Fn~~~~i~~~azri' ~Q=~ ~ ~ z~~'sF~~~,yBQ~~QQjf~`~R9~L~~~=4~$~~ ~ m3o"'~y~~~ A. vq~~ ~mSICAN~mF1~ng ~ ~s~~~ ~ ~O o ysx EJ ~Ox TZ> m ~jfp r~ ~? ~>~ .7 < _ !~1 f Delc 0/-11-0! Na RMYm~ ~"~ c1 ~ ~~ CUPERTINO OAKS suit ~1ppER PARK DRIVE 3 Drawn: ~~ SAN J05E, G 95131 ~ ~ ~ PHASE 1 ~~ 108-467-9100 ~ ; ~*~ NOTES AND LEGEND ~~ +Da-~7-91se cF~) p ~nKo:O>eola CUPERTINO SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA ~~~~~r~'ue~ c i^' I _~ ~" ~ ~ r .' -i N '_ , ~~ ~/ ~ • I ~ ,d - ' ~- ,~ -'" ~ ~' Asa; I - ,/='•:.-cam ~'~i ~ / ~ ~- /-9s _<~ ~ =`~_~': =_ %~a .R; ! .a ~\ I ~ •i' _ 1 i-~~ I l I / ~ ~' ~~" '~ i ,'e 1~ It I / ~J % ~ / V ~~ j ' \~ C c ~ I%/ ~ / L % ~ -~ .,~nL '-sue ~ 1 i~ i \~ -"~ T f ~~ nt ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~ // ~ `/ ' ' i I /n ei/~ ~ /~' ~ ~~~:_~-aE i '1i~Ly - i9 1 \ ` ~1`~,. 1 .~ :1 1~ ~~ E ~7 /~;~ /'r/~ •!~ ~~ ~, -_~_. ~I . / !//; _ i ~~ `I.L4`iw, I .~ Y' n ~ 11 ``~ ~ ~',:;pQ ~ ape ~ _ ~ `' /',// ~~I /~ a I'I - ~-, ,'71~ 1 ~ m 11 /' \ ' ~~` 1 ly -~ E" ~ ~} ~ ~ ~ ~ s , cr i ~~~ i ~~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ i1 11 E ~ ~ ~\ 1~~ ~~ ^Y~ ~ ''di~ nt Y ~~ ~~~' 1 !; ~~ / ~"~' // I I I III ` ~ It rl~~ `~ •Y y/ _ ~;a. ~ ~ / ~ 'L_ ~ /~ ,' ~~ ~~;~ ~;~/~~ E ~ a ~~ i~ ~ p/~ / ~, aI ~ - ~, ~! ri .~ !'III ~( • I ~ ~ % ~ = III ~ / , ` ~_ ~' ("1I~~p~ '~' ~~~ ~/~' lr1 ~ r Il " I ~ ~ I ~1 ~= ~~ ~' .fie _'~ ~ ~ I ; ' ~ i ~~ 11 ~Rk ~ ~~ \ d~ . / ~p~' I ~ ~\'I I 1111 1 %. s / _= ~- ,~ ;~_ ,~ ~, a; / I __ ~ "~ I I as a~E 1 ei` s -- ---~ ""~ I:~ ~ F ;~_ ;~ ~~~~'t'~, ~~.~ 'fir ;_ ~ "~ " ~ i ~I ~ ~ I '_-~ / J~, ~ ' '' 11 iti to ) YI D I/ I _- ~~%= I li I /-'" ~ K ' / i ' _, ~Yt~, , I t I Y I !u ___ I ~ I~ I Y ~ ~ Ark WY~ ~ ~ ~ ~l x ,~+~ „ ._y ~/ '~ ,~ // r ~~' 1m'%~~'p ~ \ \\\ '.\ ~ \\;\\;,~--\ ~\T,, =i`ai ~,y [i a ~l .~j X i I ~ ~~ a E; \ ~ ' ~ I j= i ~ ~ ~ ~ / , fjG E .19 i , j~~` V NHS/A\:\~ i / ~ ~ i;~ ~ ~ / ;~~ I!I ! f 1 ! i//~k\v 3 1 /i~ ~/ ~ I t ~ } ~ ___ ! n: ,,,,, I I ~~~ ~ i i ~l ~f ~\~" _1 ~- - ~~ Dale 01-11-0° Na RM=IrnR ~. saa1R,•./D• CUPERTINO OAKS 981 RIDDER PulK DRNE ~ ~ _ °"'°" PHASE 1 .~ g k F ~ ~0~ G 95131 Oman: ~~ 408-487-9100 EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ ID°-487-919' ~P""> ~ A„fa~ad il9P E~~ ~a.rme lru.r .ten Na07°019 CUPERTINO SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA ID m z Z m m P1 AYG CAII I~.e / '.u.r~~11~ ~ ° I~ ; /~, ~ ~ ,~?1 ~ l'~g0~'~~' ~~K I ~ ~ !III ~~~ ~ w ~ , ~~~. A ./1~I~~I ~ ~ 'n i ~ ~, , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V~ ~ I . 1 ./ ~ ~1~~~ ~ ~~;~~ v .. 1~p III ^, ~ r ~ , \~•` ~~ I ~ g ~ $ !~ 1~~ 11 ~~" ~~~~ \~~~~'°~ '~ ~ oeuounoNNO,ES: gg~8w 1 ~ ~ 11~ ~~ ~ ° a`~~ ~~~~~1. ~ ~ ©REHOOE TREE & ~ O i v III I ~~ 11i~1 ~1 " ~~`y ~ ~~~v\U~~ ~~' QREMO~AC ~~Z(BI ppI 1 1 Ill ~ ~ / \ \ \ ~1 I p PNNYY ~II1~ ~~ ~ \~~ V ~~ I ~ ~ 03 nE~ov>:Er~cmauER x.. I f, ~(~, 1~1 11, ~, t. ', ~ v~ \ .I ~ a 1 1, {!1~ 11'• ~".. ~ ~ G \ \~~~~,~~~~ ~ m OO RELOCATE TRANSFOREIER PAD ~1P !~ ~ 1~!! 111 V ~ ~n V ~~°~ ~~I`F~ AV ~I ~1i'!illllll ,au ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ re:a I!;' 11.`'1' ~I v .i / ` ~ \~., os•~U~n r 1 . _ ~ ~ ! ,~ I ~ ~ < ~''f '~. \ \ a~ GRAPHIC SCALE 11 11~ 1~~ 1 036 ~ ~~~\\ \\ \\\\. ' `~ ~,,,/ ~ ~ ~ ~\ •, ,' 1 111111111 ~ 2 \\ ~ \l ` 7 :~ ~ ess.9.\1 ~ ~~. I _ ..vim` /S _ \\ FE~~~'llllll~~~l. t ~ ]:id \~ /` \ `l / ~\~ ~ ~\ ~~ ``_~~ imv. w'v+ ~'~ ` ~Y / ` / ~~~_~ ~ ~~~+G.. 1' 11111~~° ~ r i~ G6 ` ~ ~",~ .-~~.`"~~`"_~ / az ~'~ ~ LR0.1nD [us[ua[n er Q VI h11d111 ~ .~ ~ sae. 9 ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~\\ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r. ~„ ~ _ r msc~rn ar sass 1~1~111~ ~~ Iv. ~~ ~a !.A, ~ -__~- _Pa5 =~ J nexsE rRee~ ~ ~' V `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IIi II ~.i i ~ • 1 ~ ~ ~'~-,..~_~ - - '`` oz3 ~--cr P.l~N4~RaEE; .'~\ Q .~, ~` ,_ 1 ~ ~ ~ _ 9 1 ~?`,~~~ Ill I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_-~_ .... - U ` \ _ ~,,~~ \1 ``Il\\ 1 [i~i1~~I~~I 'II xl 1 r 1 ~ I _ 1 n3.i ( ~ ~ ,~~` ~ l ~,__ ,~__- - En r'!~i =~n~~.. ~ `~ -~ ' ~` M ~ ~\••\~' I I 1 I ~~ III Q 1,- ~ h o ~ 1 1 1 1 'i tT! 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 ! ~ -"~~ ~.\ ~ ~» ~~ 1 9p ~ 1111111 1~ / 3 l~ ..rn a ~~ 1 ~; I c . 1 i ~ I ~~'. rte. ~ ~ ~'-'-~~ _-~ ~ . ~~ 1 ' `• 1 ' ~N1 11 i ~ ' 1 . I /- ~ / 1 ~ ~""~ -ENSE 1REE3 '~ 1. 1 1~~ ~. 1 J 11~ 1 I . ~+`~~ , 1 ~1 l ~ 1 w W ~ / ~~\ \ f ~ ~ / .nnn I i Z } ply m1 11~1!'1~i I r oexl ~•~, 2yo ~ ;s.:~ny ~•~ \\ 7 ~i. I J ~1'~~y 1 ~`I1~'~II' ~ `~ z - ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 ~- ~ 1 ` '~ 1 ~ ~~~,~`~ 11. `t 1 x'11 ~ ~ ~ e ei~ • ~ ~: • . ~`~~~ , ~ 9~ . ~; .6,. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ . p /W~ z YI •JII'1 1111 . + ! ~~}~~ x c %~! \ '~'~~ \~,E~LN7 D~CURE7 Br Q ~ J I, ,,~ '~ ~ ~ - ~ '~ ~ ',~~,~ '~ ..;~,I w a ~ I , l l 1 ~" ~,, '\ ~ 1 1 c SELBET6L 4 I `,~ `~ ` ~ ' VI ~I G W ~ ~~~ -1~_ u~~! ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~Yf ~ ~ ~ _ ~~oe ~ ~ i .~ze' •V•"~~ ~~r A ~~~V A ~ ~~!'e' ' I "~1 ~ ~ ~~~ 11 ~ '~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ x i ~ ~ ~~~ ~;~'~ ~~ ~ r !~ ~ ~~sp' I' 11,1 1 l~ 1~ 11 ~ ,jl~ ~, 7 PHASE 1 - V '~ •~ ' ,mdrm ~. ~11 1 ~ I ~- F 1 .t, Y~' ~saFtm er ~ ~ ~ 1~ 111! I ~~~ , ~~~,~• 1 ! ~ ~~ DENSE4REE5 ~ ~ , , 111 1 ~ , ~~ - ` 1 ~ 1 ~ ` -~ 1 ~ ~, ~-~, ~ a~ ~' 1. 1~1,~ Il ~ , ~ ••~~r' ! \,,11 ' ~xms ± y\ `~"\,• m * `. ~ namarr.. aril 1 ,1 1 ,~,~ - •~ ~~~ ~I 11 ~~ "', ~ _ 11 ~~ ~~1 \, ~ ~ r, ~lr I ~ ~ ,~CC I ~ ~" nExsc rREC: I~~~ 1 ~I III Z `~ I~ 1 I~ F X111 N~,l Y P~, ~, ` ~1' `~'~ i SEi~ BEI64~ „ _1, '` , ~'F- ~~~ ' 'r~ I I ~ I'! ~ a =~1-J ' ~s v 9 ~+L11~~- ~ - ~, `, see sf ~ , 1 ~ 1 I ~~ 1 0p ~E) ' 1 1' I F~;1 ~ 1 'SW 1 59F f ~ ~ 1 ~' A ~ II I I I I I ~~ I I V 1 II ~o~l ~ I Il\~y r• ~' k ~p~ fa . uw ' Zq~ - ~~R, d, En er 11 ~.~, ~~ „11~1~~~'~ 11 , ~ ;z>~~ i ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ afE1.~.Te~.~ .~~~^~ .~ ~~ ~~~,~~~ .1 ,~ 1'°fi' ~~ 1 ~~ ~ _ rte, :~, ~~ ~ `' W . • ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~~1I~ ~~~~~~~>,`" ~ ~ 1 ~,, - ' .III ~. ,~ ~ ~., ~r~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~d I ~ (~re ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ I \ \\`1• \ ~ \ w bN D-lal. w Y - \ ~ ~ I f 1 I I ~ L.x \ w I I I I I I 1 . J J ~ m "" P4xcoUrypriS~€'w~'RiMl7 ~~~ 50. ;~ i~V`% /~\, w„ .am.~- .~. I ,~ (ry,'y~~yI~\I'i 1 ~ r~w~.~~~1 7~~~.. / 1 DENSE iRFES ~ ~I ~ ~~' I I r 9N 11 ( / ~ I Elf I ~/ • '%I ~~ V "YVY~ / • \~ ~ ~rwwy~ ..sn 1 I ~_~ -- 7- %~~ ~ ~ .I ,I W.IJSt iktLD 2,' I - »~=m _ _ --CSC ~---~.- _ _ 7p p S 31 ~ •T'• ~ 4 -1 sx''~~- _- __r _- _ _ _ ._ -_ ~r .l sw\ I ms ~~ ~ Oruwhq Num6x: i ~ % / ~ / / / E919 5~g 0 BKF ENGINEERS ~ ~ r t 1 ` g ~~ ~ I r~: Y m ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ 4~ I~~ GRADING NOTES. 1,: r ~ ~ QI NEW AC SURFAONG AND PARKING STALL STRIPING ~ a ~ 1 ,q 4 w ~y,, r 11~ \ ~ \ a `~ 20 NEW PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS u Aga ~,1 I ,~~~~ x \ ~ @~ fi ~g • I I l~11 11e 111' .1 ` ~~., F-, 03 IX BINLDINC BF7NC DEAOL19im AND REMODELED ~~°Yi 1 g I }Ili a I+ F- '~~i~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ I h 1 ~< i' q''. \ \ ~. ~% r s O NEW AC SEC110N Arg1 PARKMC ,' ~-kf m~ ~ ~` ~, I ~ 11 ~ `~ ~`, d / ~ sr 0 VEGETATED BIOSWALE, 4' WIDE MINIMUM i I ~ I 1 1~1 ~ x . ~ 1 -1! , . r ~ ~- ~ s I` ~ `1 ~, P i \~~ 1 `~`s-. -_`_ ~ j~'i. ©NEW 5' WIDE SIDEWALK t t 1.1,LI I ~ ~ ,\ ,~ ,ay 2 I ~~ 1 ~ =T ~ ( i l 1 1 1i 1rf *c r ~r` ~,fV '\~ ~ ', 1 ~ v ~ih 1~ ZZe3 f ~ n • ~ ; \ ~ g r ~ ~ =' 1 ~.~ I 1 Y ~ t. a 1 ~ _. ~., ' s.o III ' ~`r ~~,., .,• ''2'~,.~tx. ~"~.. 9. ~ i ~ 1(`1~,i ~-~ ~ 0\~ ~ ~ a~~{'x r ~ s: ,~_~. GRAPHIC SCALE _ t I ~ 11111 i, 11A ~ ,~3OT9 TC ;~- ~ ~' r~ ~ 4~ a _ I ~ ~- ~t I I'I III i,1 ~~ ~ L ~ ~^ ~ ~ •'., ~•''Pt' • ~ ^~v J- -- ~~~ r ~ ......... --,.. ~ ~ ""~, ~ : ''~`cihZ.~' ~ ~ v •- i 1 a rm 1 ~~~ Ir q' I d ~. ' n v 1~ i; .. xv7 ~K-P.. 11 se' ~ 11111; I ;~ y ~ R" J ._ 99.18 ~~'` ~ - "` - _ - i` V I~ crr x u:' OF -~ ni ~~. 7 I k ~ ~ "'~~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ y~r~ ~~~ _ ~II ~ ~~ ~ nn:[ t'FrroH ~ 1, ~\~ y ~ ~ ~ .. ~~ ~ Q a-- e i }, 1 v T r~ ~ . ;: y'±.~k 2 •• ~` ~._ .._... '' ~ yF -..n- `` r - T ~ {~~ I,~n T.r ~ O !I 11 AIT'x 'I ( '. .' r ~ _ -FNy~~ _. ........ ~ ~'"-_~ - '~'lF '~ KW1' .i~tl` _ 9 .) a IF~ ._. \ ` N .. j ,.al1 ~1~1;2 A .; LS. ~ •C.1\ ~~~, ~ ~. Im ~ .',a 3a - _ ~ Ci-. _~ 14 ~- ! ~ I V f i Y£ - PI 1 ~ ~ .~ ~:. j 5~1Jdlr~l ~1 ~ ~,, In x'~ ,4 :•. ~ :~ '~ '~ 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 1 i .h~ 1 ~ 1" C!~ ~~I~II 'f- .y, _- .. ~ V IM ~ ~ I .. ~v "r' t ::. I ~a- : I i 1 ~ T b ~i ' ~'\2 : 1 ~• ~ allj1 I i.~ ~~111 ~~~ I ~~p~ 4~ -- ~sM ~1 I Ix ~.1' Ii '~.. r~~ ~ m r 1).- .r. x:, ~~/ ~ ~ Z 1~ LLy X'I ~ p `( ~ Y.. ~~ m~ "r 1 r 1 » 1 l ,,1 • ~: , ,_ .',._~~ ;~ 1 ~. ~ 1~ 1 il 1r) i A f r ~ I z~ i 1 r cE[ gg > 1 yu t { ir~ pA ~~~ ~ . _ i 1 'wC ¢ i 1 ,F->, ,~ ( ~ i_ tit ~ YI ~. ~ E. v 1 lly~ ~' r I aY11 l }' J~+I t l ~ 4 • Y ~; r~ '~ ~ i A G J f 1'I I1 Y~-: •' ~ ~k'n,~~- ~.._ 11 r ~ 1 r ql '~ ~ I ~ ~Z~U I _ ~ ~~ ® i 2 I I ~ 1 ~ ~ '~, '~ li ~ ~ Q ~~ ~: i ~ 1 W ~ i ~~_ ; ,~ i ~ ;~~ , .~ p, I rO ~~ ••y ll~><. ~~ ff ~ G` 9~ ~ 1 f ~ ~ _ `R. i~ . ~ x ' \ Al ~ ~ ,1 V ., .. ~ ~ 1 \ SI I ~: 11 ~ ATE J ~ - e .~ ...T •~ I _ .. ,~ '1'--`i' 1 LULL L FC[ F I ~ t I I 1 p ,_ I ' d PNASE 1 U fRDF _ j ~L ~ N R .G i ( :O i y ~ . ~~ ~~ P ~1. 11 _ ~~ ~- ~' k ' y J ~ ' ~ ~ n:~,A n ~ 1 1 I 1 f. I~ 1 in,R " ~, r^ 1 I , ~ ~ y I i ,~ ~1. ~ 1 I ~ _ + V Ih ~ ~~~ t lia ~ ..~ I I I, ~ I1. . ~ ' I'h.. ~ ~~ ~ ~:. G !h ;~N~1 1 ~a~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~ (I ~ I» ~ F W Y ~ ~ y ~Q E~ ~ s r I f~ M. '' I !'+ '~~ 11 ! I I~ 1 ii` \ y _, ~yti it ~ .q r '' -W ~. ~ I \1 ~ ~ , i ~, , ,'.,~ U. s+a. ~^ I~ III ~... /. ! '~' ~ o I 1 ! ~ I r' ~ f it i 1' d: v 1 " 1 ~ p Gr r L.~. 1 1:1 4 x+ i Z ? t :,x' a u I ~ Ir ~ L ! I 11 l i i 1 .:i ~~ 0 i I `G l E~ - I a ~,, `t`. kr ~ `1 ~ ~ ~`` a i r r v. ~ ~ ~~~ I I 1 ~ ys , ~ 11 I , -, ~ ~~ i71~C fW"z'~iK~E;~ 4. ~ r` I ~ ' l,.l ' -i n'` r , ~ .. I ~ ~.'~~ MIT ~ ~ L.'9A,~P l~ i Lam. 1. ..:...u. ~ ~, r l F . a ~~ __ ., ~_~ ~. ~ sue,. ~... _ 4--J ,. , 4 ~9z- ~~~ ,: ---~~ ~..~ .. .~_.4 _ ,. ~• ., mi+ ~. • r; y . _~,'; ~ _ , • I OroNnq NumW: C-6 6 a $ ~i RKF FNf:INI `~ i ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ _ r~ v \' 1 s t ',~ tai i Al,lu l,. y ~ ' 1 ~ ~,' _ 1 i 1 ' 11 ~11~ ~ ~ I' 1 111111 d ~ ~ ~ ~.... 1 Y A TILL 1 ~ 1 \ ~ .1+'IJI- ~ ~ p O R 11I './ k '+ '~ 11 ~ 1 ~, 1~ 11,1' /~ ~~~ ~ x~, g ~0P 1 IY.~i~ -4. ~H g •I I I ~ ~~!1v11. 1 ,A,, < I- ,.~ ~ ~~,j rcy~~3~ee ~' 11 ~1 1111541 A~ !~ \ ~ 1 C(~~~ ! 1' II ~~ ~!' 11 111 ! \ ~i~ • . l t' , 1 1 '1'~ 11111] ~ \iui~\ ' ~ -~...r~' L 1~ ~ 11 1 ~11~11 k 4~r '~ 4 .~ ~ 1 .. 11 i ,~ 1 t 111 ~~ ~ .., x- ~ ~ i~•, 1 ~.11 ,'1~ 1'1 ~ ~,~ , ~, . ~- 1 1 ~ M 1 ;, 4, +~~ ., I , ,1.' 1! ,1 ", ~. ~~ ~ a I ~~-~. '~ ~ ~1 ''11'1 ~ `~ •. ~ ! ~L,~ 1 1 ''11n , < ~~11 ~1 X1111 ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~1 i111, r tan~i ~ :~, ~ ~oRi~t -., GRAPffiC 9CAI,E 1 1 A r ~ ~~, ~.J` ~ 1 l '~ R S.~ ` 1111 1 ~ ~ I ~~ L 'tom -~1 r 1 1.1 1 ,~-~. ~., _ j ~ 1 f~i1d1F11 ~ x. , p ~ ~ -.. ~ ~ rtiun~~z,.~ur~ Q ~ ~ ~ n H~~. ~f ~ SG~:~~ ~ r ~ r 7~' eaa. ~~1 ~ z Z o t ~ ~~~~ a ~~~ ne.c,.~•wl~ P Iii, it 1 1 11' 1 ~--~- ,, z .1nm~4 , _ .~ a~ ~ _. 1 ~Hu~l, 3~ k_~ w ..., 1• r ~~.,~•'~ °L~~r.. ~.n ~_D! C~~~ r_ ~ese __ ~ O 1 ~ ~,.. .1 K =_ (111'@@,,~1 1 ~1 _ ~ ~ \` ` 1 11 111 M'b1y 4 1 ~ I 1~ - - 8 VCP i ~ ~` ~1 r ~ 1 •`, ,1 1 ~, ~ , , ~ 1~, ..,,we_~ mil' ~ _/'1.~r __ .- ~ ~ j ~ ~-- ra { a;' ( '. 1' i ~6:~~2'vlpll'~~s' ~' ,~,rils4Fio'avC siir P~ ~ - ~- ~--- '_`'~ ~ ,/ra\ ~,_~..~ 1 ' a+. 11 •~ 1 4i~~ 11 fi~ 5~Q0!ol ~ ~ ~ ` -_„C_~ ~ ~~ 1 `~ • Ll 11, 1 1 '1 ' S'v 1 •. ~ I~ 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 Y ~ 1 ,~~. 1 ~su \~ 'k ~ .. k. i 1 t r I . ~ f1Y ~~ .. 1 ~.. .. ~ '~ as. 11111 1 ' I ~~ ~ I 'R ><. j ( _ 1 1 ~ 1. 11 1 ~.1 1 ~~ 1 1 ~ ~!} I _ ~' ~ _p"i ~ ..~ r 1111111 1 ...r. 1~1' 1 1 .. i 1 _ ~ . , ~ _ /~ '~ ~ R D ~'`" ~ A 1 r v~v ~._ i a I 91 1 ~ 1 w . P. ~ .a.oel 1 ~ __ .. ~ fe ';.,, ~~~n . 1 5. 1111 1 A ` =e 11 `5 t ~1 f 1~ v 'Irk' - - ~ ""+1P, pr 1 ! 1 s d L~ ~5,~ ~ .; i. ' Ills ~~1'1.>, f) A\,t _ .7 ,,~ ~ '4 .,b, ~ ~..r j ~~ i ., 1 ~, 1 t .~. I ~ iV~ ~~. ~ ~ ...~ ~ '~} 11 1 111 X111:11 _ a 1 FXs H _.Y p .~ ~/" ~. ~ ~ Z If 1111 1 ~ 1 ~~ f _. ~ 3 '.^~h: ~ ; ,: - 1 1~In11 ,A. ~ I' 1 j {YU e,1 ~/1 a '~• ~ 1 ~ ~~ "'+~' .{, ~ ~ O r _ '1 1 _ ti hlll~y' `1 S- Z,P.,^ i i~".,1 1 ~1 'll 1 ~.'y ~. 1 s ~ 1 ~~I Y ~~' ee.e W aU w 4 ~'' 1 111uti1 b' SO'~o10 ~ ,, ,`d ~ 1 ~ a ~ r. v~ ~Q 1, ~ ~ ~ ,y _ 1 - 1 i'~ 1 ` 1 0' ~+M'o rrr,aru _ ~' T "~ ~ , W 7 _ ~- `''` a ,, t 1 ~ I1 \ , . ~ rl; „ ~ ,<u ,~~. I F- Q J o ~~ 1 v 91.1+ 1 a -~:~~_,-~, `; 17 ® ~ t .~ I ~", ls~"4 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~¢ ~ `~ , !4 ~ ' 1 - 1 r ~ ~ 1 I ~I ~ 11 t ~ \ ~ w ~r r 70 ~,; C 'n ~ 'V~ I N \ ~ _ SD Swo.01o k .. c ~ ~ ~. 1 1 Y ' 1 t ~ ~ I ~ YLF'10' PYC - ., ~" ~ ~ ~~~ '. f, s'1 h ~,1. ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~,"fv' k1 §Y: `. m Sw0.01 I wFix' °~' ~ l~~ I~ ~ ~ ~ V ~~ 1 4+ i ,,,. ~ zse? I- 1 \1 x I 1 ~~- ~- f o 1 1 1 ~ 1xh' X11 1.111 11 '1-~ ~` 1 1 , ._ __ • ~.. 1 - ~._ I ~1 ~ 1, i 1 1 l ~~1 . 11 1 ~ ~ ~ ), SATE per; t! PHASE 1 -1111FR0C~ - - .~ 1, L1 ''- ' 4Y i L}"~. IEU: ~I• I ~ ~' \ ~ li?; '~:~. ~I l~• yI 1~ _Yf' ~9 1~ ~ ~1. 1k 1 ~ ~ r[~. i•. ~ 1 i ~ 1 I I~~~1j~ L' j I ~ e1~ ~ f ^I 4 0 ) \ ~} 111 1' 1~ ,~ it S_a _ t -._ ~ _ , ~ , l ~ I7~ ~1`I l ~ 1 1, ~ ~. lit ql ~1' ~ T zY ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ ,.,r _ i e .~ I 1 I~ ~ 1 ~. O ~' ~~'~ i ~ Q p. r ~ _ ,i n ~ ~ ,. 1 '~ ~ '1 ~ ~I 11~ ~' F 11 l ~~ ~ ~?3 I I ~ ~~ w. ~ ~ ~ 5 '~ ~ a 1 ` i~ ~ I 1 I ~ ! ~~~ ~ .~ '~ I ~ ~I ~, 1 J ~1 V 1 ~~1, ~1 ~~ e I`~ i 1~1 .- ~ ~ °r ' ~ e Y ~~i 'S ip ~ ~'" 1 ~; ' a ~ I i 1~ 'r[M1[!1 R ~t'~``~ D': 1 ~ ~ ~ 1~ _ 1 ~_ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ' ~ 1 r ~ . \ ~ ~ '~ t} ~ ~ 1 11 11 1 ,' , _ , - fix.-sD-uNe _ I~ ,y .. b ~I °~ I ~. I 1 , ~ I ! jl I ~ V 1 ! _ Q°' ,' ''0 ew .e . y ~ ~ i ~ I i_ 1 ~ r b' I y11 ; `4.1111 _ l `', M~ ~ r o ~ ~~~,. , j r ~. r l~II ,I'I, \11 ~ '11 ~i t `''t A 11 a ~ ~ 1 ~ ~I I I -1-.6 1 ~ ~. ~ a ', `,, ~ ~, . I ' `;: ~ ' i ° 'I ~' 11 o, '~ hl ,~ ~ ~, ~, _~ ~_ . ~.. .L. ~ ~ I - 1 , 3•. ,vl. ~--~ .~.! J..:-. I f_ `r J..I ~' ~ li [~1'II evr=,~ I ' '~ aau S F ~= w« BFP L, c i 1 ~.. __ ~~•~ ~~'~_ '~ rr[ irt1:~- 1 w I .1 i I, ~~. A ~1 I - 1 f~ ~~ ~ ~ .r ~ ,~ I ~ ,~e~l'A~~~~1MIT Cfiun ~ ' I 1 1 r ~ • •., ~ v I ~l W .o °~ , r \~ -r„ ~_ ~oeh+J.~ wY. ~_ _,! I si11 -.--_r ~ ~ ~ u_4. lyt.r.1 II ill ' ~ .• _ •• ~~~ s _~ -~ 1 _ -. - .., - T[a-o'- ~-_ _... _ _'•~_..~'_-- .,_ .,_,\.. ,!t _ __ ~ cam..-~',~ ~_ t - ~-r--- _ _ .,, ~ , . • •. •••~ • ~~, .- - - - r ,• ~ 1 _ _ n -~ SSE. RE~EK~ LL -- ,. ~ ,I `y! ~3.^+ 1 /~- ~ .,~~ T_'_r-~ .~.,y-~u~-('1--- i'---.,~r-~i '~ -l~~-i~~-xl_~` / ._~ _ ~r ---~.~-`-°- -y-ter `~ ! g ,~'I C-7 T~a ® BKF ENGINEERS .OWlCENTRIC MANHOLE e IR phi" nvi crtr oP L ( N]iILLIiNe -STANDARD IXiO f CITT OP CDPOITIMO Ln iyµ ET ARD~DETAIL! kR ~~ I N' YNw e~B ~- ~ - L xnnl LMe fJl1Oi _NDTE~ Eras aleldms ReRq _ Ilq run the ww-1 N IY Ciy Faglew. ~Ap r r J II J ~ LA' r xt}INI 41 ,rL~~ flA• I 1 I ' i ~.1 r>=L~~i ~~ xrnox e. aRaNae ~IIx LEtIR NLET • CURA OPENING -z . IT R wTn~ Ynn ..1 /nl n aaJee Y 6xM W len BW lKBldlw. BWR Iea~lw Ram le /d CITY OF CUPEIITDIC ~A~wED ~, S x SWAIF BACNFlLL MATERIAL TO MEET DRAINAGE INTENSITY AS $PEpFlED BY GEG7ECHNICAL ENGINEER r 6' ~Z~ ATED 3WALE J NOT TO SCALE rINE'A' sBERUe ~ ~~ a~ ~ xlAdm P,uc W JWiLA GIf B~, JrW~ h~f oL ~'M \~Ali BxtINR / i•.. R/Y ~ h P ~/ y ~ '` ''t. ND~ Lnmt. sNR.es wl Raielnr h I . „„„„- +,n ,N.do eel wwbwbl R-0 _. ^ m ~ eur awn I.et lv e1 ~ gmktl n p S RLM fR M Lbsae Bnrh iTIW ~ 9pntlk le he noloatl el+n Iw /An- L h wee ~ I N a nRnhwln M p, N ~ ~ Y Y Paynlnt b M Rw+ ~ oR ar p~. w pAM n ~~ ~' '"'°""° ' maVL IAlp S ~Rletln wiMR~ln 9S B[CTIUN ••A . DRIVEWAY DETAIL -MONOLITHIC SIDEWALK RB11~ yy yLpT att aE cupocnND AP ~ DA ' ~ t-n dTY ENpN STANDARD DETAILS RWniol IR'M. pnW SbBe ISNR B' b~ ' wlp, tr 7< a. ~ Te Bey . m' x' ~ u' : N' ew.vtl n+, a' .n x nx -ar o n n L` a ~$~ ~g~~§ a~~~~ ~.' Q Z K Q U N OrNo J~ W- ZyWa ~-_~~ Wa ~ a Z N u 0 z F tt W a U i~ ;~ a s~~~~ MBBYIq NBlnbar: C-8 8 DA g It- ~6 ft E r z,• I ' I Paromerl ilueh R• /Y K ~ p~Y~ 6 7 w ronaMe ,.;th queer tA' ~ tY ~ R.,.%3~ c ~ r o L.. • ~ ° oo eTRD ° BI 'e Cmn II Aqq. bLBe al•6 a?{ ~ ~t~ 6 t3 2A' C •e.l ~, \ I. B. Rrl/'A Y or rpriahN e tR• ~ ~ ~ , Y Rr:/7~. 00 Dpap °TpO u NI aia ~!• DlRie A Agg• boas I.DD' f7 ~~ Z4' A-D.DB R•B.x I ~ I \~03:' T rR.Y T I R•t7 1.33' I 17 ., A I(!~ T BBB NVCI B.I%~ p 1YPEEI~OUNTABLE.M.1 lao ao e tas: II Aqy. 6LSe TYPE E ~. t' " T ~ e.t/f 1~; s ~ R.,a 1/e L 1 1- ' T ii ~~ tz' b ~~ 1 fS bgNllinal In ~~ EXTRUDED GUAR ,n h°°t ^~ ° "wN' ~ ~a Ac. DINE ~ A3ER A3~D STANDARD CURB SECTIONS REYl9 pAT Clrc Of curExnND AP7ADIEG BY Aft'. I-16 STANDARD DETAILB C BI x 9ECTIDN STANDARD 24' FLAT GRATE DROP INLET xrna N ar+~ r r CUPERTINO OAKS PHASE2IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CUPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA -.-, ~, 'op s l i ,r~ 5 'Wwba-~ ~ ' ~~~ le Y14d1~ s k r ~3 ~? ~ ~ , a ~` r y' t + ~% " ~ r ~wmaea ~, . ~ , Q~ i 1 ~ wawa "~ 4 :~3,q,r,tl L ~ 2 °ow v.«n k D~bX G+7wlk y~I~ P S ._;w r n d ge of 4~ ~ p. 'a ~, +w,au ~ p,nn a,f 'y,:~ ~ cmkp~ h aww ~ ~ e~ ti. ~ ~ . ! -a. a ~+, '~ ,ate r z, ~"± ~ ¢ _ 17 p',° ~ ~~umanAa6mr~ne ~y.. k~ ~ ~ .w~w.a,:.: Aa~4 ~ ,` I ~P -• r q~s ~ .; : i ; t r,U I tu M .. ~ . -ar.wr++ ua .~$~~a ; . ~ ~' i _p . CDN~serG~ e' ~-aYYieA 'YYM~q ~ eK ~ . ~~~ l-4; Y ~~ L w„ ~MM6 .. ~ .i , g~ vnu a u YJ . FFCV , _P - '~1 M1n ~ ._ _ r ~~ ~.i's~4h p M'~. ~ ~, tv.; er. :, f.i % F~,pp aaexnrd i r ... L ~ i5"~! ... ~"", ar ~: ~~ fm~`eYeeY' tnm .,: VICINITY MAP N.T.S. i~ Y~ v ~, eda~ ~ _ n Y N g a ~$$ 8 nr ~~~os °H~~s~ m~ !:.1 a SANTARY SEWER NOTES _ Z O 1. Ad wok perfomwd shall be Irotdled k manufedurers sped5a0ons acid dl wale shill wrtply wph all curtent local, slate ~ and federal requirements. ~ Q 2. AI work shell be wnstructed in eaadarae with Uese plans end Cw Standard Spedfiations d the Cupedino SeNlary Diable(. tJ 3. All esravetiw end backPoing wShM street ripdafway shat be done in acwNance with the requkaments d the EngMea SHEET INDEX d the puMk a8e^cY havkg jurodiction. Enaachmed Permps abet he obtained end a wPy shall be on the job dudng wrotmctiw, C-1 TITLE SHEET 4. FII malarial shill be wmpaaed 1o a mkimum d two and aw haH (25) feet above the top d pipe ebvation by nwllads C-2 GENERAL NOTE$ tlwl will not danwpe the ppe a subs5trded witli gravel a ono (1) slurry miz. FI mdedd must aCain a midmum d drwty t St f C fi 95% l ti tl le Nf l St d N S dS ti ~ C-3 NOTES AND LEGEND ve percen ( ) re a ve wmpac m, m per e o e om a en e pe a ons. ` C-4 EXISTING CONDIRONS 5. The Distrlq Eneirwa shell be ratpied two 121 xoddno dens M edverra d startles canehvdan w this ordecL 211533 Y y C-5 DEAIDURON PLAN Stevero Creek BNd Sups 4M, CupeNm, CA 85074 (408) 253-7071. At that time, freffa pkro, encraechmem pamlts F C-6 GRADING PLAN and the sewer dWerekn plans shay be given k the Diatrkt Engineer. Sewer diversim plero shag Indude sewage bypass O w C-7 UTILITY PLAN and emergerary plow. Work shell nil begin untll tlw Dhlrkt Engineer Iwo provided wdCen acceptance dthme plero. N W O C-8 DETAILS 8. One (4) mnpary sewer laterd shill be Mdalbd M eecti Id a bdlding. LasCon d hlad end property comere b ba o k d i f eld d tt tY th i h td d f tr 5 l L t h ll b l l I N s a e n i w same ne e sewer me n a w a wro uc era on. a s s a rat e d on mo then two a ~ Z y gamed (2%) grede aril del have a minimum corer d bur end ore half (4.5) tail d prepedy line a edge d sanCay sewer eeeemed. Laterals shell be deeper then has and one haC (4.5) feet when directed by District Engineer. Leterele shall nil Ile erdended beyond tlla SNaei dgMdway pa or mrdl8ly sewer eesenwm 6w untll the mdn tors been lmtad L Q W ~ J U 1"' Lekrel sewan wnstmcted octaide d the public atred or Cupertino Sanpery Diabkt Eammed shell be wrolnwted M = eccerdarae wiM the requlrertwda d, end shell be Mepectetl by the City d Cupertlno BulWing Depamrwnt. W ai ~ Z 7. The Cadreotar pedwm'np work on the sanitary sewers shell be requked to regldar wCh the District end provide Irwurena d ~ m spedfied in Sedione 1.38 aril 1A0 d the District's Standard Speclicatloro. 8. The Devekrpa end General Contrackr shall be responsibe fix protective d all aASting imprevemads Mduding edeting sen5ary sewer tedl5m Cwt are k remain and C damaged during wrolrutCion d the propmed improvemenh, shop be V repeiretl k the edisfagbn dNe Cupedira SarOery Distrk! end olhar e0ected agmctm. B. Channels d ep Dlatrkt manhdes wChin the oonsWCticn area shall be proleded by ptywood rovers, placed In tlw manhdm end manhole astYgs shall be adjusted k final gwde M aocordena wdh the SleMerd Spadfiatlaw d Ne Cupertlno Sanitary Diddd am directed by the datdd EnpMmr. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 40. The Devekper and Generel Codrecta shill be responsible fa Cie prevenlbn d wrwtmction debda adednp tlw e><ietlnp sanitary serer cydem tlue k the wrotructbn ectivltim aswdeted with Cds prefect end tlw Derolopa and Cwtracta shoo PROJECT - TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING pay all wets assodeted wlh 8re release d wrolmdiw debris ido Cre epstkg santary sewer system due k the Z SHOPPING CENTER. wnstrudbnegNiU°°a°sod°tedwMhCYaproj°q' F 71. The Devebpar end Gawrel Contrarlor shag ba rmponsUe kr Cw prevedion of a sewage aplll msadded the Contrackrs ~ edNXiea w tlds project end Cw Developer and Conbador dwli pay ep wda msodated wpb the relmm d serape kilo a surface dreirwge system end dvwrotrmm sodas orders. U 12 Utility Notlfiation (CarNeda shop kale all gP~tias pna k start d eaareCmk e. Undergrand Service Abel BOD227.2800 b. StamDreiroCltydCuperSro c. Serytay Sewell Cupediw SarYdry District 13. AR Senpery Sevrer Pipm shell be PVCSDR26 or approved equal, calms dtwrwiee spectfied by the District Engineer. 74. Access fa pedmMero end vehldm shell be provided d dl limes unk+as approved in writing by Ne Distrct Engineer. f Approval d Mme plero by Cupatlw Senpary Dhldct does ref relieve me Irotaller d the reepansibllty fa CK conectlon d e mbfakes, errors, a omissbro. C, dudng the cousa d wnehugion dtha sanpary sewers the puck Inarrml requkes a modifiation d, a a depedure Irom the District 5pecificetlars a Neee impavenwm plem, the Dbtrkt Engirwer shop have the aupadty k regdre such madKations a departure aid k spedry tlw manner In wNch the modifiatloro a depature is k he done. Approved 2004 CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT e Distdct Engineer #~...~~ ff~~~~ C-1 1~ ®BKF ENGINEERS CAUTION: 1. 1HE LOCARONS, SIZES AND/OR Dff1HS OF E%ISRNC UNDERGRWND URLIRES AS SHOWN ON THIS PUN WERE OBTNNm FRdA SWRCES OF VAfiYNG RELIABIUtt. THE CONTRACT0R R CAUTIONED THAT ONLY ACTUAL IXCAVABON WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS MID DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERCRWND URLIRES. (A REASONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCALE ANO DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGRWND UTILITIES). CONTRACTOR SHALL VETSFY LOCATION AND DEPRi PRIOR TO ANY IXCAVABON OR IMPAOYEMENT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Fdt LOCATION OF UNDEAGRWND UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HWRS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION -PHONE (BOO) 842-2444. CONTRACTOR SHALL 4II6FY ALL IXSDNG UTILITIES PRldi TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS 9TE J. CONTRAC711R SHALL RENEW TXE RECORD DOWMENTS FOR THE EIOSTINC BUIWINGS (DRAWWNGS ARE AVNUBLE AT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT) FOR ADDIRONAL UNOEIEGROUND CONDIRIXJS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT NREADY BE SHOWN ON THESE DOWMEN75 PRIOR TO COMMENCING N1TH UNDERCWRNO, GRAdNC OR FOUNDATION WOW(. 4. THESE DRANINGS DO NOT ADDRESS C(NTRACTdi MEANS, METHODS OR PROCESSES THAT MAY BE ASSOCIATED NiTH ANY TO%IC SOILS IF FWND ON SITE. 7NE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL dtt AND CWNtt STANDARDS AND APPROPRIATE REWURONS OF TOIUC SdLS ARE ENCWNTEIED. CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE dTYS PRO,ECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY F ANY SgLS AAE EVEN SUSPECTm OF BBNG CONTAMINAIID. GENERAL SiTE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NSIT THE SITE PRIOR TD BIDDING ON THIS WORK AND CONSIDER THE E1aSRNC CONDITONS AND SITE CDNSTRNNTS IN THE BID. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE N THE POSffSSIdJ OF AND FAMILIAR M1TH Cltt STANDARD DETNLS AND SPECIFlCATIONS PRIOR TD SUBMITTING OF A B10. 2 ALL NDRK ONSITE AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALLL CONFORM TO qtt STANDARD DETNLS k SPEdFlCARONS 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE PATH THE SgLS REPORT PREPARED BY 1READWELL AND Rd1A DATED: 11 AUWST 200J, PROJECT N0. 3718.01 AND THE APRIL B, 2004 lE1TER TD JANE VAUGHAN 1171ID 'NdiTH PROPERtt LINE AETNNING WALL DESIGN RECWMENDARONS' 4. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, AND AFTER INIRAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL STAKING, CONTRACTdt SHALL FlEW CHECK ALL ELEVATIONS MARKED INIH (E) AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCES GREATER THAT D.OS' TO dTYS PROEECT ENGINEER. 5. DAMAGE TO ANY E1(ISTINC SITE IMPROVEMENTS, URUTIES AND/OR SERWCES TO REMAN SHALL BE RESPONSIBIUtt OF THE CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPNR AND/di REFUGE N KIND. 6. CONTRACTOR SMALL PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A TRAFFlC CONTROL PUN THAT ADDRESSES 1HE NEED FOR THE CONRNUWS USE OF THE STREET THRWGHWT THE DUAARON Qi CONSTRUCTION. 7. dNL ENONEER OR SdLS ENdNEER TD RENEW ALL GRADING ANO SUBMIT A FlNAL REPORT TO 1HE dTY PPoOR TD OCWPANCY 8. COMPACTION REPOR75 AND PAD ELEVATION CIRRFlCAIE IS REWIRED ON ALL BUILDING PAD WORK. S. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS, 173-3104, FOR DRNNAGE AND FlNAL GRADE INSPECTION, WHICH INCLUDES DARN LINES AND ROOF DRNNS/DOMN SPWTS 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WST CONTROL AND INSURING THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE WORK IS LEFT IN A CLEAN CONDIRON. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RENEW STD. DETNL 6-4 ON TREE PROTECTION PRIOR TO ACCOMPLISHING ANY WORK OR REMONNG ANY TREES 12 URLQE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S), AS REWIRED BY THE STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD, FOIL ANY ACRNTY, WHICH dS1URB5 SqL 13. ALL ROOF DRNNS AND/OR DOWNSPWTS SHALL BE DRNNEO SHEET FLAW 2x AWAY FltOM THE BUILDING AND MAYBE COLLECTED BY DRNNAGE INLET CONNECTED 1D PU9JC STORM DRNN FACILITY. IF AND ONLY IF 1XE DRAINAGE IB IN 1HE HILLSIDE AREA CAN THE WATER BE OIAECILY CONNECTED TD THE PUBLIC STDAM DRAIN. SiTE YAINTENACE: 1. CONTRACTOt TO GATHER ALL CONSTRUCTON DEBRIS ON A REWUR BASIS AND PUCE IT IN A WMPSTER OR OTHER CONTAINER WHICH 15 EMPRm OA REMOVED ON A REGULAR BASIS. NHEN APPROPRIATE, USE TARPS ON THE GWRND TO COLLECT FALLEN DEBRIS CR SPUTTERS 1HAT CWLD CONTRNUTE TD STORM WATER RUNOFF POLLURON. 2 CONTRACTdt TO SWEEP OR VAWUM THE STREET PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS ADJOINING THE PROJECT SITE AND THE ON-SITE PAVID AREAS ON A ONLY BASIS SCRAPE CANED-ON MUB A1D DIRT FROM THESE ARUS BffORE SWEEPING. CORNERS AND HARD TO REAdi AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. J. CONTAACRIR TO SWEEP OR VAWUM THE STREET PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS AD,ONING THE PROJECT 9TE AND 1HE ON-SITE PAVED ACAS ON A ONLY BASIS SCRAPE CANED-dl MUD AND DIRT FAON RESE AREAS BffORE SYkEPINC CORNERS AND HARD TO RUCH AREAS SHALL BE SWrPT MANUALLY. 4. IF THE STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND/OR PARKING LOT ARE PRESSURE WASHED, 0®RIS MUSE BE TRAPPED AND COLLECTED TO PREV4TT EN1RY INTO THE STORM DRNN SYSTEM. NO CIEANINC AGENT MAY BE DISC1ARGED INTO THE STORM DRNN. li ANY CLEANING ACEHT OR DEGREASER IS USED, WASH WATER MUST ~ COLLECTED NVD DISCHARGED 7D THE SANITARY SENER, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE dTYS ENGINEER OR INSPECTdt, OR OTHERYASE DISPOSED OF iHROUdI APPROYID DISPOSAL METH005. 5. CREATE A CONTNNED AND COVERED AREA ON THE SITE FOR THE STORAGE OF BAGS, CEMENT, PANTS, OILS, FEARLIZERS, PESRODES, OR OTHER MATERIALS USED ON THE SIZE THAT RAN: THE POTENRAL OF BBNG dSCHARGED INTO THE STORM DRAM SYSTEM THRWGH BTHER BBNG WND-BLOWN OR IN 1HE EVENT OF A MATEPoAL SPILL 8. NEVER CLEAN MACHINERY, EWIPMENT OR TOOLS INTO A STREET, WTTER OR STORM DRNN, 7, CONTAACTdt TO ENSURE THAT CEMENT TRUCKS, PAINTERS, OR sTUCCD/PLASTEH FlrWSHINC caJTRACTDRS oo NoT Dlsau+cE wASH wATTO+ FROM EWIPMENT, TOOLS OR PoNSE CONTAINERS INTO WTTERS OR dtAINS. & THE ON-SITE STORM DRNN FACILITIES SHALL BE CLEANED A MINIMUM Oi TYACE A YEAR AS FOLLOWS IMMEDIATELY PPoOR TO OCTOBER 15TH AND ONCE IN JANUARY. ADdRONAL CIEANNG NAY BE AEQURED IF FWND NECESSARY BY 1HE d1Y5 ENdNEEfl. CONTRACTOR SHAH BE AESPONSIBIE FOR COSTS ASSOdATED WITH CLEANING. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DUST FROM LUNNG THE 9TE AND ACWMUURNC ON ADJACENT AREAS AS REWIRED IN THE DUST CONIRW N01ES oN THIS SHEET. 10. CONTRACTOR 10 PREVENT SEDIMENT DEBRIS STORM RUN-OFF FROM LEANNC THE SITE OR ENTERING STORM DA0.1N OA SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS AS REWIRED IN THE EROSION AND SEDWIENTARON CONTROL NOTES ON THIS SHEI'T. 11. MNNTNN E%ISRNG TREES AND PLANTS THAT ARE TO REMAIN AS REWIRED BY THE TREE AND PLANT PR0IECRON NOTES ON TNS SXFET. DUST CONTROL: 1. WATER TRUCKS SHALL BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL PORTIONS aF THE 9TE SUBJECT TO BLOWING WST SHALL BE WATERED AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE qtt ENGINEER MANAGER IN 01lDER TO INSURE PROPER CONTROL OF BLOWING DUST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 2 WATERING ASSOCATEO KITH ON-SIZE CONSTRUCRON ACRNTY SHNl TAKE PLACE BETWEEN 1HE HWRS aF B: W AM ANO 7:00 PM AND SHALL INCWDE AT LEAST ONE UTE-AFTERNOON WATr36NC TO MINIMIZE THE EFFECTS OF BLOWNG DUST. J. ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND MEDIANS SOILED OR UTTERED DUE TO THIS CONSTRUCTON AC11Ntt SHALL BE CLEANW AND SWEPT ON A ONLY BASIS DURING THE WORKNEEN, OA AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE dtt ENGINEER, TO 1XE SA715FACRON OF THE dTYS ENGINEER INSPECTOR. 4. WATERING ON PUBLIC STREETS OR POWER WASHING SEDIMENTATION ON STREETS SHALL NOT OCWR, UNLESS CONTRACTOR COl1ECTS AND FlLTERS THE WASH WATER PPoOR TO ITS ENTERING THE dTYS STORM DAMN SYSTEM. 5. ON-SITE PAVED ACCESS R0A05, PARKING AREAS, AND STAGING AREAS SHALL BE SXEPT ONLY WITH A WATER SWEEPER. 6. ALL TRUCKS HALA,NG SqL, SAND, ANO OTHER LOOSE MATEAIAIS SHALL BE COVERED W1H TARPAULINS OR OTHER EFFECRVE COVERS. 7. THE SPEED OF ALL VEHICLES DRIVING ON UEBAVFD ROADS OR PORTIONS OF THE SITE SHNl BE LLMITED TO 15 MPH. B. WHEEL WASHERS SHALL BE INSTALLID AND USED TO CLEAN ALL TRUCKS AND EWIPMENTS IEAVNG THE CONSTRUCTON SITE P NHEEI. WASHERS CANNOT BE INSTALIW, RRES OR TRACKS OF ALL TRUCJ(S ANO EWIPMEN7 SHALL BE WASHED OFF BEFORE LEANNG THE CONSTRUCTON SIZE EROSION 8 SEDIYENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 1. ER090N CONTROL MEASURES ARE INTENDED TO PREVEHT SEDIMENT AND OEBPoS FROA1 ENTERING THE qTY STORM DRNN SYSTEM, SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM OR FROM LEANNG TXE SITE THE CONTRACTdi SHALL MAKE ADJUSTIAENTS IN THE FlELD TO MAKE SURE 1HAT THIS CONCEPT IS CARPoED OVT. 2 EROSION CONTROL FACTURES AND MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND OPERABLE BY OCTOBER 1tt (OR M1TMN A PEPoOD OF THREE WEIXS AFTER THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ACRNRES, IF THAT START IS BETWEEN OCTOBER AND MAY) AND SHALL CONRNUE IN EFFECT UNTIL ,TUNE let OR UNRL INSTALURON OF RTE PERMANENT SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THE CONCEPTS ON THE EROSION CONTROL PUN, SHEET C5.1, ARE SCHEMARC MNINUM REWIREMENTS, THE FULL EXTENT OF WHICH ARE TO BE OEIERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE E%ACT DESIGN AND E%TENT OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM SO THAT IT WORKS M1TH THE CONTRACTOR'S INTENDED USE ANO MANAGEMENT OF TEE CONSTRUCTION 9TE. 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACTURES SHALL BE NSPECTEO BY THE CONTRACTOR ANO REPNRED, AS REWIRm, AT THE CONCWSIpI OF EACH NDRICING DAY DURING THE RAINY SEASON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TXE EROSION CONTROL FACURES AND MAKE NECESSARY REPNRS PRIOR TO ANROPAIm STORMS AND AT AEASONABIF INTERVALS DURING STORMS OF EXTENDED DURATION. REPNRS TO DAMAGES FACURES SHALL BE MADE IMMEDATELY UPON DISC0V4NY. 5. AS SOON AS PRACTICAL FOLLOWING EACH STORM, THE CONTRACTdi SHALL REMOVE ANY ACGWAUURON OF SILT OR DEBPoS FROM THE EROSION CONTROL SEDIMENT BASINS AND SHALL CLEAR THE OUTLET PIPES OF ANY BLOdCAGE 6. PRONSION SHALL BE MADE TO ASSURE THAT BORROW AREAS AND STDCJC PILED SdLS ARE PROTECTED FROM EROSION. THIS SHALL AT A MINUMLMI CONSIST OF COVERING 1HE AREAS WI1H PUSRC SHEERNC. 7. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CLEARING, GRADNG, OA IXCAVAPON, 1XE CONTRACTOR SHALL VEE6FY THAT THE ONNER HAS SUBMITTED TO THE STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOT) FCR COVERAGE UNDER THE STATE CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT. 1HE CONIRACTdi SHALL MNNTAIN A COPY aF THE Nd ON THE CONSTRUCTON SITE. TREE~PLANT PROTECTION NOTES: 1. PRIOR TD BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION ON SIZE, CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND PLANTS DESIGNATED AS TO REMNN. 2 PRDNDE 6 FOOT TALL TREE PAOTECRON FENCE WTH dSRNCRVE MARKING NSIBLE TO CONSTRUCTION EWIPMENT, ENCLOSING DRIP LINES OF TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. 3. NDRK REWIRED WITHIN FENCE LINE SMALL BE HELD TO A MINIMUM, AVOID UNNECESSARY MOVEMENT OF HEAVY EWIPMENT WITHIN FENCED ARU AND DO NOT PARK VEHICLES WITH IDLE RUNNNG ENONES UNDER GRIP LNE OF TREES. 4. PRIOR TO REMONNG R0015 AND BRANCHES URGER THAN 2'IN pAMEIER OF TREES OR PLNJ15 THAT ARE TO REMNN CONSULT KITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 5. ANY GRADE dIANGES GREATER THAT 8' W11HN THE DRIPUNE OF E105RNG TREES SHALL NOT BE MADE WIHWT FlRST CONSULRNG 7HE LANDSCAPE AACXITECTURE. 6. PROTECT E%ISDNG TREES TO REMAN FRpA SPILLED CHEMICALS, NEl dt, MOTOR d4 GASd1NE AND ALL OTHER CHEMICALLY INJUAIWS MATEPoAL; AS WELL AS FROM PUBBJNC OA CONRNUWSLY RUNNNG WATER. SHWLO A SPILL OCWR stop Wt7RK IN THAT AREA AND CONTACT THE alts PROJECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY. CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE TD MIDGATE DAMAGE FROM SPILLED MATERIAL AS WELL AS MATERIAL CLEAN UP. I. PRONDE TEMPORARY IRPoGARON TO ALL TREES AND PLAN75 THAT ARE IN OR ADJACENT TO CONSTRUCRON AREAS WHERE EgS11NC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION, ALSO PRONDE TEMPORARY IARIGATON TO RELOCATED TREES. B CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAN AND FOR MNNTENANCE OF RELOCATED TREES STOCKPILED WRING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE REWIRED TO REPLACE TREES THAT qE DUE TO LICK OF MNNTENANCE DEYOLRION NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND d.EARIY MARK (AND 7HEN PRESLIiYE M6E MARKERS) FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCDON OF ALL Te]EPHONE, DAtA, STREET UGMT, SIGNAL UCHT AND POWER FAOLIDES TXAT ARE IN OA NEAR THE AREA OF CONSTRUC110N. 2 CONTRACTORS BID IS TO INd110E ALL NSIBLE SURFACE AND Pit SUBSURFACE FEANRES IDENRFlED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED N RiESE OOWMENTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHNl BE RESPONSIBLE Fdi A SITE INSPECTON TO FULLY ACKNOW.FOGE THE E%IENT OF THE DEMWRON Wd6C. 4. 1HE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPd1dBLE FOR OBTNNING ANY AND ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR ENCROACHMENT, (iiAf%NC, dAIOLIRON, AND DISPOSAL OF SND MATERIALS AS REWIRED BY PPoYATE, LOCAL AND STALE JURISDICRONS. 1HE CONTRACTdt SHALL PAY ALL FEES ASSOdATED WITH 1HE DEMWRON WORK. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL HAZARDWS MATERIALS FliOM THE E%ISRNG BUW.dNC AS IDENRFED IN THE SPEOFlCAilONS. WORK AND DISPOSAL SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER AS SPEOFlED IN THE SPECIFlCARONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE E%EWTON, PERMITS AND FEES ASSOCATED WITH THIS WORK. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY dSPOSAL FEES. 7. BACKFlLL ALL DEPRESSIONS AND TRENCHES FROM OEMWRON TD THE SARSFACRON OF 1HE SdL ENGINEER B. WITHIN OMITS OF WORK, REMOTE WRBS, WTIERS, LANDSCAPING, SIGNAGE, 112EE5, SHRUBS, ASPHALT, UNDERCRWND PIPES ETC. AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWNGS. B. REMOVAL Cf UNDSCAPNG SHALL INCWDE ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATERIALS TO THE SADSFACRdV d' TEE SgLS ENGNEER. EROSION 8 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PRONDE A CONSIRUCRON FENCE AROUND THE ENURE AREA OF DEMWRON AND CONSTRUCRON, INCWDINC ALL STAdNG, STORAGE, CONSTRUCRON OFFlCE ANO UYDDWN AREAS. 2. FENCE LOCARON MAY BE ADJUSTED FROM RME TO RME AS CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDS TO IXCWDE SOME AREAS NHERE CONSTRUCTON MORK IS NOT BEING DONE AND THE ARU IS NOT OBJECTIONABLE IN NSUAL APPEARANCE. J. CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A 6' HIGH GALVANIZED CHNN LINK WITH GREEN IWNDSCREEN fABAIC ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFUGE THE GREEN FABRIC AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR OR AT SUCH A RME AS IT BECg1E5 TATTERED AND UNSIGHTLY DUE TO VAND OR CONSTRUCRON ACRNtt. 5. CdVSTRUCRON FENCE ADDRESSED IN THESE NOTES IS ONLY FCR NSUAL CONFORMANCE OF THIS CONSTRUCTION SITE TD THE dtt STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR MAY REWIRE ADDIRONAL FENONG, BARRICADES OA OTHER SAFEtt DENCES TO IODP THE SITE SECURE 6 SAFE GRADING NOTES: 1. ALL PAGED AREAS ARE TO SLOPE A MNIMUM OF 1x AND MA%IMUM OF 81L ACCESSIBLE STALLS AND LDAgNC ZONES ARE TO SLOPE AT A MA%INUM OF 2x AND ACCESSIBLE PATHWAYS ARE TO ROPE AT A MNIMUM OF Sx IN THE DIRECTION dF TRAVEL AND THE SLOPE CROSSWAYS TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL SHALL BE AT A MA%IMUM OF 2x ANY AREAS ON 7HE SITE NOT CONFORMING TD THESE BASIC RULES DUE TD E%ISRNG CONDITIONS OR DISCREPANCIES IN THE DOWMENTS ARE TO BE REPORTED 1O TFE ENdNEEA PRldt TO PACCEEDING WITH PUCEMENT OF ROCK BASE, FORMWORK FOR WF6S AND/OR FLATWYMK. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE EARTHWORK WANTIRES BASED W 7FE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THE SdLS INVESRGARON AND THE PROPOSf:D SURFACE 1HICKNESSES AND BASE THE BID ACCdidNGLY. NOTE THAT A SEPARATE DFMWRON CONTRACT XAS BEEN ISSUED TO TAKE THE SITE FRpA THE WAY IT S AT 1HE RME OF THE BID TO 1HE CONDIDdJS DESCRIPBED N THESE DOWMENTS. ANY DIFFERENCES BETN£EII THE STATE IN NNldi THE SITE IS DELIVERED TO THE CONTRACTOR AND THESE DOCUMENTS SHWLD BE NOTED TO THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL FlLL SHALL BE COMPACTED PER THE SdLS REPORT AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COMPLY W1H THE OWNER'S TESRNC AGENCY TO TAKE THE APPROPRIATE TESTS TO VEf6FY COMPACTION VALUES. 4. IMPORT SOILS SHWLD MEET THE REWIRFMENTS OF THE SOILS REPORT d: SPEGFlCATIONS. 5. COORDINATE THE PUCENENT OF ALL SLEEVES FdT LANDSCAPE IRRIGATON (WATER ANO CONTROL 'MRING) AND SITE LIGHRNC PRIOR Ta THE PUCEMENT OF ANY ASPFIALT, BASEROCK OR CONCRETE SURFACING. SEE UNDSCAPING AND SFlE ELECTRICAL DIiAN1NGS 6. DO NOT ADJUST GRADES ON THIS PLAN W11HWT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 7. SITE STRIPPINCS THAT CONTNN ONLY ORGANIC MATERIAL (NO DEBPoS TRASH, BROKEN CONC. OR ROCXS GREATER THAN 1'IN dAMEIER) MAY BE USED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR AREAS DENTAIED AS IMPORT TOP SOIL BY 1HE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. EXCESS STRIPPINGS SHALL BE REMDVID FROM SITE B. SPOT ELEVATION ARE TO FlNISHED SURFACE S• TOP OF CONCRETE WRBS ARE 0.50' AB01f TOP OF PANNC EIEVATONS, U.N.O. 10. RWdi GRADING TO BE NTHIN 0.1' AND FlNISH GRADES ARE TO BE WITHIN 0.0.5', XOWEYER CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT ANY MPROVEMEN75 THAT WILL CAUSE WATER TO POND OR NOT MEET REWIAEMENTS IN GRADING NOTE n. GENERAL ML1TY SYSTEY NOTES: 1. Nl TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFY.LED PER THE SOILS REPORT WITH APPROPPoAIE 1E5T5 lO VERIFY COMPACREN VALUES. 2 CLEAN WTS, CATCH BASINS APD ARU DRNNS ARE TD BE ACCURATELY LOCATED BY THEIR REUTIOMSHIP TO THE BUIWING, FUTWORK, ROOF DRNNS, AND/OR WRB UYWL NOT BY THE LENGTH OF PIPE SPEdFlEO IN 1HE DRAMMCS (WHICH R APPROPRATE). 3. SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOA CONTNUAROV OF URURES NITHIN THE BUILDNd 4. ALL PROPOSED URURES SHALL BE UNOERCRWND, UNLESS SPEGFlCALLY CAL1ID WT AS ENTERING THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATON dF ABOVE GRWNO UTAItt EWIPMENT (BACKROW PREVENTDR, ETd) AND MEET WITH dtt ENdNEER AND PROJECT ENdNEFR TO REVEW LOCADON PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANNING DEPARR,EN'T MUST SPECIFlCALLY AGREE NI7H LOCARON PRIOR TO PROCEEINNG WITH THE NSTALURON. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AN ACWRATE CdIPOSITE URUtt PL4N THAT TAKES INTO ACCWNT THE ACNAL LOCATON OF EXISTNG UTILITIES AS OETERMNED DURING THE DFUd1RON WYMK, THE URLIRES SHONN ON THE dNL DRAWINGS, AND THE SITE POKER, CONDUITS AND LIGHTING SHOWN ON 1HE ELECTRICAL PLANS. 1FE FlRE SPRNKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INCWDED AS DESIGNED BY THE DESICN/BUILD UNDERGRWND FlRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR. 1. FOR CRANTY ROW SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR SHALL VII6FY (POTHOLE IF NECESSARY) SQE, MATERIA4 LOCARON ANO DEPTH OF ALL SYS11DJ5 THAT ARE TO BE CONNECTED TO OR CROSSED PRIOR TO THE TRENCHING OR INSTALLATION OF ANY CAANtt ROW SYSTEM. 8. CATHODIC PROTECRON IS REWIRED dV ALL METAWC FlTRNCS AND ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE IN CONTACT WTH THE SdL CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO FULLY ENdNEER AFD INSTALL THIS SY511]1 AND COORDINATE ANODE AND TEST STARON LOCATIONS N17H d7Y5 PROJECT MANAGER. 9. COMPLETE SYSTEMS; ALL UTWtt SYSTEMS ARE GELINUTEp N A SCHEMARC MANNER ON THESE PUNS. CONTRACTOR 15 TO PRONDE ALL FlTTNGS, ACCESSORIES AND WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE URLItt SYSTEM SD THAT IT IS FULLY FUNC110NING FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. o ~ n C ~00 8 yj I I a-~uo ¢~ m~ a~~3$ i.. m~ ^j ~:~ Q Z K O J Q U N Q W} Al F H Q NZO QWJQ Zy~Q I ~ U wa~Z a U t$ i ~i~ C-2 2 DF O Z F a U =I J O~ U ~ f/ N O~ 41 + W N 4 N W N N ~ W N m~1g~° s~ ~~°y~ mpv~ Pzz~n vc~~ ~mcvi~ ~ tic z~f ~m r v v °zmK ~'I<{ (~ iozv ~c insz i~ o>am rv ~ c vN y n~ o~ ~ ~5y~c~ vym~ymp'^ °i$ n~$m ~_~cmc~Cn a c~~ > p°~ i O o y ~°>~p ~ ~~ = z°~i ~T~ xg°~ ~ ~ ~ ~y $c ~~~~'mv~ ~~~ ~~ D ~~n~ ~p~ nmSL>~> Cam= >00 'd ~OZ ~N~jp2 v py~>}4'J pp~~~ ~1 ~Q]~~ L O O ~ ~pO I(~2 ~ ~yZ C_ ~ ~S p~Q>~O'I ~'~f ~yC ~ ~~ A~;=~ m~p~pr A8l p~QD° Qy = 8mn~.T O; >yOr N~p ~>> !~>I~ C~px~~yn Q~ ~ 24^11 `~ZZ ~y~ 2 ; m a ~C 90 C m<~ C ~Z ~'m Zf'~~ ~1~~1~ ~ ~ O QO ~~C.I mZy~Z 2!^L~ ~~< 9 'LZ~ ?QQ~ZZZNy im~ f->CU 022 ~'[~~' ~$~ >~~•S~ mAOO` ~ ~Nyr+l ~~~ ~M>~ ~ C C ~ ~~I~C~ f/1 y~>~ ~ ~~~ >~ ~m k~lj ~ y~~ -1~~0~ ~<O~~N'y ~}' "~ y ~O O fQ~ PJPrZ °Z ~}>'O (m~ y~ Z~ ~ ~ .~ZC ~ 1 ~ x ~ v m ~ ~V y~~y ~ SO -11 Cpn ~ Z~ O --Zi mhl ° ~2 C m~ CZI~In _~ p ~ZO~ ~~NOZ 2NZyZ0 0 S~ \m K N C S ~ 1;1 ~Z L n° >; O (/~Z y~> Lx Z VI > QyZ C ~ ~~C ~Z ~d>mKl C-i °°g~ z~9 z L o o°~ ppS z~ z ~ $~' > z $ 5Q~ ~-~~ F s~ ~ ~c'~~~1 ~x~ tQZaF r~ ~~ z ~~ ~_ tLr.~ °> g~z~ ~ss~ g~~N ~~~ ~~F fg~m SJ$N~m = '"~~ m~ '~°x> `" f+ ~E ~ ~~{~ g Sd~59 ~ N~ z~~~{ \c~ ~ ~~ ~+~~~ zg~$N ~ ~m ~'~>p~ 5d ~mQ €v~ yy'"`^ >~°~ $ z~ ~ ~>~ o c>'Si °' 8 '" ~"~ ~ yy7~ g~g i~FJ ~~ln $_ '~~~ Qrz~ ~ ~~'[py ~~ ~r0 gZr yA0 O~ M O ~ O g ~ Z > T ~ ~> ppS$Q 1~1 Q~ O >O m >" yL ~S -~ ~~ ~ i~n~ c~_ Q$Fi x X12 ~~g~ .>~ ~ ~~'18 v ~ "$ A~ ~o ~v~ m ~~ ~m~°c m~ °m m=rA ~ ~~>~ ~~~ Aq~ ~~~~ ~°s~ ~ i~~ ~; ~~ F ~ g~4 F °FJ= ASS ~~? m~O LQ~i g~_~F jjg~b zQz ~m ~~g~ s =gmr~ ~g ~;~ ~$g ~~Og ~~" s~ Frit'ii ~ 8 ~ ~ N ~ ° my {''o ~ ~ g ~m4 o~~3drmi~ ~~czi m~ m N > O < B mO Q f^> O C 8 pp_ -/ m> C N m ;~ n o ~ Z y y~ C 2Q~~ '+ cNY,~ jO rr Aj ~j0~ ~ 1~W ~ r O.~s ml~l~ r1 v y Z 2 ~Ox ~ "~ gp ~ ~ w~ i~ ~~~ ~?,Eg~ g~~ ~/~`~ r~< ~~ ~ '~ ~ mR~ ~ l~Q~~ ~c,~~~ ~~'v" ~__c~~ ~~ ~~~ mm'~~~ o$m ~~ ~~ v o ~j ~+- ~' +n ~ z mTzv m~ ~ -~ ° ~Ay ~ ~ ±~ orzrv ~s ~1n" ~~ n 4 > m La> o ng~ H r8 sN >r °<r~N ~~n~ No ~ ~< ~ °~ ~> ~ v Fg QCCvx~,{25 bov ~gEILL ~ ~ ~ qgg ~~g.. ~LL-~o ~?:o ~ Z 1 ~ ~ °;~ ~~ x~~ so ~"~"' ~> ° ~°-~ rzjNCZi=~ oho ~ Q~ F Tz ~~ ~ 3~ m v~ FF ~ 25 F~ > ~ ~Fvi ~1~> ~-25 ~~ Q~y p z c> ioc ° ~Q~p~ ~ czi~ ~~ ~ z> m~c ~~ ~ my v"1 ~~ m ~ ~s ~z ~~ Z ~~ tz~~ ~zc 4 ~O Z < m`Z ~ A ~~y~ >>Z> L A C~~ R'LLL ~ Z> ~ ~1~1 to ~f/1 O f~J~i Z> OF m~ ~ m>~ ~ Cm g ~~ ~mg~ r~~ >~ Sim C C ~ ~8"1c °~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ min cm~~ ~ ~}tl N~~ ~ ~ ~ ~I z " ms ~y ymp- ~i m mz {z~ yzz r ~m m o $I! ~ ~mpz R p ~ z ~C p~ 1n m ~~ Q~I jxlx~l~ I"c;m ~'a O~ N N !^ Q N m Lm.~ m~T ~~A ~Y' y C~~Cj p~ O >~ A~Orn ~} Cl ~ z z>~g ~ ~ ^'~ C O ~ Lvo g ~ ~m° G ~~IZQ ~~ ~+Z1 ~~ ~~tl2 -v2° `~~P ~ L c'~ ~ m ' f+ N W p , m Q 1 ~~~ +r+ ~oSdmr~i m ~ "~ 1 ~~ ~m ~ o~ ~ co~ °~ m~ ~ ~ n ~~L~~ ~ sv ~ v e~ ~~~g ~g •~ ~~v ~~ g5 ~~~ ; ~~v~z ~ AS 5 5 ~ m~~N o= ~ Nmr51 yc Yo ZmZ RRfy~1 x ~ y QF .{ ~~ ~ I y ~S v 1'IZ~ ~ ~~ZC ~ ~ 1- ~~ L O 0>"10 ~ r O QI m ~$tog Z m ~ ~ TZi rsl o'~~ Q~ 9 ~~~ ~ y '(.477 ~p>Z4 Nf/IAC~1 L' x ~ '~ oOm OO~ j~s ni ~vp~ > ~ i xx > g ~~ ~~o~ y°'~° OWN po" ~ j~~C ~2f/1~ O A ~ 2 ~td~ O~ ~ ±8~ A ~ z app^m>-°~ ~ ~~ 1"°'9s~ +n~ ~ Ppj° cc ~~ ~xxx~m m ~ ~ ~ 8~u~,~ r s~^pry' Y (n x2Qj C O^ ~ X O f~l ~~ N~yN \ ~#' ~+' m 3X~ml~i ~ F~ ~ O~ O~ -ICO~ ~ ~ CI NI~'> N TZ~ ~ N C ~~~`Yi i~- _ ~o it DZO A Z ~ ~'g N ~' m~~ ~ ~~ m m ~Z m~'~ ~ m ~<m z ~~ ° g ~ ~ m ~~ L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m L ~ IQ O O O m C>, O ® p ^ $ $ O i ~ x x ~ r^ ; c~ m ~' ° m ~ ~ ui ~ O I I I I I I I I I F `" I I I°~ ai C I I I I I I I I I'~ I I I' I ~ ~~ IIIIIIIIIIII III ~ Z F a ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ x s y y~ m ~~ u-I~~~m ~c~i~~~~~~~_~ i ~~v f^m~~'Iz r'J C"i~r4j~$f m ~ ¢ ~ r~~ s Z ~ -~ ~~ -~yy o~~~-~ tnmm~{ ~nac zc zx c~ ~ ° m L~ m avcc~~~~mgc<cv~$>Qo~o"~i z_"~~mp{?,,mo ~, m~v~~gE F ~~~m~~Z~~`~r„~~~R2ZO~j y~~~O ~ 4~ pn C>~O rrC011 A ml~l~ ZZ 71 Q Tj ~f x ~x =~ ~m N^~ ~~ ~ IQ `> +Q 8 O ~> >_Z m f~7 ~ Y! o~ A w ~ ~K~"'" N` ~""" ^ ` , e 5aalr KONE CUPERTINO OAKS 981 RIDDER PARK DR ~ i € °'"'° PHASE 2 ~ ~ ~~ ~ NE W Qp ~ p~ ~~ NOTES AND LEGEND ~ ~~ ~ SAN JOSE. CA 95131 ,~ 46709,00 +~-+~~-9+~ ~~~ ~^""a~~ CUPERTINO SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA ~~~~~~~~u~ ' /, ' i ~' 7 /, 'i ;; ~~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~? ~~ '?~''y i~ i,' ~ -lam -- ~ may- / ; f ,%% ?f~ ~ ~ _ i" ° : , .+~ ~ , ~~ / ~ rte' ~ ~-_.-" .. ~~! :f~.•i i• i~~ _ ~. ~ ~ ~-~-~F- t~ ~ x'11' ~"f ? i ~1~= ~. ~ _ ,~;;:. % A ~ yl~ fe~'~ // /'~,/ /~~": i n e/ 1~ /' ~'`- =y~Y-y~~h3"+~y" a f.1- `\ .fC ` "~ ,~,. ~A "~ \~j ~~ \/~ / ~~ ~ /W°'1 ~ ~ `~~~~ I -~` ~" I - ; ~~ • W , II _ 1 ~ t 1 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ '~" ~ i r \~ I 1 _ .aiA/ N ~,e~q// ~~ / ~-~ ~///~ a/ 11" L~ ` ~/ III1~ la .-1 ~ ~~ ~\ 1, W a. •pA1 /rte ~J ~1-.~ i -i ~'/;/ I i ~ k 1 t ~ ,,~__\\ 1y~ pka I '~If •a! ,~~~.j~/ t\ /.. / 1 / / //////j2[ ~ 1~ -="r ` / / ~ ` -~ / 1 /~ ~ ~ ~ A , ! ~ ~~ e ; I I •~ -~_ a'C/ ~ I =@E ~ I _ X 111111 ~~e " „~ ,Y, ~ k7 aC~ 1 " ~k l ~ ~ ,- = j _-I` n P _ ~ ,~ _ i : `~ nk eels -- ,~ ~~ ~I / ` ~-~~ • - `\\4~ ''~ ~ ,` ~ ~ l` F •c ~` ~ aka ~ ~ ~ ~ 4_ _ ~ \m \, \~ ~;"i\ ;: :1~. e~'-, ~ I ~ I, I* f ~~ I '7~ ~ /~\ 5 <I / I ~ ~ / E' 6~ i .ti -%rsn\\ / i / i 1 /,/~/ i / • t/i +~• ~ l I ~ ~JJ ~ ~- ` / ^ / L , I _ / .~ ~ --J ~ eke " a' `./ ~ ~ ~ \,`) .fir 71Sf~ ,~ ~ _._--.._ / c ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ c rho . j~ \ _ ~ J C - = " - ~ - ,~""~x -- _ _ _ /'= ''fir ,.. C \1 ~ ~ °d`°"-"-°° "a "'""°"' CUPERTINO OAKS a ~~ 1•'~ 9B1 BIDDER PARK DRNE ~ ~ °,~,,, PHASE 2 ~~ S~~ '°° ~ ' ~ °~~ '` SOB 457995131 ~ s Approv~k"BP EXISTING CONDITIONS ~~ '°5-'°'-9'99 ~FAx~ .we "«oiewe CUPERTINO SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA E~~>11~t~~~uAA~~ m m z Z m :I1 N m ovr rnv ~~ ~~e ~ ..u~l~lee 1 m ~~~' ~ ~ ~ rr ~~~' ~ V',,AU 1~ I ~ ~ I 1111 ~1 $ ~~ ~ / ~ ~ \\ ~~ ~@`~ I~l o t 1 J 1 1 z \1 ~, A ~. ~" ) i OE110L710N NOTES: ^ ~ ~~\, . x h 1 \~,D`, ~ ~ b l ~JI~h ~~~1 °~~ ~ 1 ~ v~ ~ ~~ ~ REMO~ mEE a X88 111 , i 11` `II~ ~ ~~ \ ~,~ I\\\I\~~ ` ~ O REMOVE AC QgNn~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~ II ~ ~ v~ ~ \r `• ? ~~ . ~ ~~ _ ~3 REMOVE ELEC7ROl1ER ~ I I Iri `µ l \\ I, M1 rc° ~ III 1 IIII '\ . . ~ ~~il ~J\~\\\ ~I~ R ~ O AEIACAIE TRANSFORMER PAD wm~BB ~~ 1 11 ~ v 1~, ~ ~. . t ~ ~ ~ ~ ', ,~, ~ ~I,~ \ '~d I ' ~~I~,I~II!!` .V \ f ~~ ~~ \\~~"~`"° °B~ra\ GRAPffiC SCALE ` 1III ~ ` ~ \ ` ``~~ 1\ ~. ,\ (r >rr I ~~t ~` \' ~ _~ __ ~,,,~= ~ ems,.,, >< I.e ~~`~1'~``i ~II~II e ' ® \\ i ' 1 7-/, ,~ e ~,~\ ~~ '~-~ ~ `°~e .'y~ ~ ~,~ ~-~ _ ~ ` ~- I ~ ~\ i-~\ ~ \ ~ Lr \ ~~-~ etU 1 , 1 ~~ ~, GC ti'°' ~- - ~,`e"~ i / crpu,o cnscu~cn nr ¢ ~ ~ ~1 ~~~, ~ \ ~~ 3 ~ ~. ~e~~ ~V~~ .,x, ~ ~ -~ r' erd~: msna¢~ nr eszz ~ ,nes~ ~y` 1 ~ ~~P~u~ ,~ '~ i A',~ ~j~. ~~ \~~~_ ~ ~,~. ~ -aa; -- ~ oc~se rxeES `A ~ \U". ~ '~ ~ Z~ 1 11 !. 1 ~,~, es+i. n ~ ` ~\ 1 11`1 1 ' r' ~ ~.~ /\ T I ~~.e.,, ,,r /- _ _ ~ _~ _"~bdif.Taees /~'., li `~ ~ zwe 1~~111 .~,r ~ r A r ~ ; :I 1~~~ ,_ ~ `'2~s. ~ , _~__ - - _ _ 1 \I T'I~I,+ ~1~ 1~"~I I 1 I ~ I T ; i, .en, ~ ~~_ __` I ~~~ I ~ U `-,,`t '~, II'~111 11 "` ~ ~ '_ = ~~' \ ~ I ~,,_ `gs° ~~ eet ~n J .nzs i ..` ~ \~_, \ w 1 ~ ~,~ ~ ` III'111~1111 ; 1, ~ 3 ! ~ I /e ^ r au ~, ~ ! 3 (> r~ . ~ ~ - ~ -~ -~.~~', ~~ ~~ ~~ c ~ `\r "~'° . / ~~ ~ (A ~ ~ `R`te , ~' l II 1 ~~ ~ ~ .1 ~e I ~ 1 /~ "" UCNff~iREEi 1 1 1 pl 1 1 ~ J~ o~ i e ~:" y ~~ ~ \~ ~. ~ ,wn IP ~.i `~I ~~~I,II~ ,-~ I , J~'~y~~~~~ e' ,v ~~~ . 1 1 ~ . , 1~~ 1 , i ~ 1 `1-1_ 1 ~ ~ ~ ,:,~~ , t~Y.a:~~ i~\ ~~~':".~ Y Z I11 1111 111' ~ ' 1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ `ti ~ ' ~ ~, < ~ 111 1\ ~~, LI~ 1 / '' i~ Lev 299,E iev ~ ~ ~1 \~ `~ \ ~ ~ L E / 1~ ' III 111, /i1 / ~f 'i1 1 `1 t1 1 1 u~ • \ 1~ ~1 / ~ I ~ O ,~-~i,, ~~!1u11i =~e` o ' ~ ~~ -.- ~ ~, ~ ~ '~ ' 11, ~ ~ ~1~ ~~ 1 ~ 1.~ :~ I ~~- ~ ~__ "~\ ~,, ' .e~ ~ ~ ~ , p w z" ~ _,,, ~ ~, o ~f l ~ 11 .a!~~~! Il~t1 . ~ ~ i 1 'Y hi-~ '-~ ~ i y~ . , ~~ a3 ,A.,.,~. \ .ti*> ~ ~~ clet'N7~o35~wn nr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J F r 1Jn1 r cws'I ixt:s ~ /y H ~ll 1 sr~`'j1 ,1~ I .as i ~_ ~ ~i1 ~ ~ I ^ wa.p ~ i '` \ nec / ~ ( ~ ~ ~ \ \ k ~A' * \ . y ii O H 11 , ,',~ ' ~,1~;11'~, ~ E f ~ ~4~ r' - '~~ % ~.~ \P \;,~ ~I,II, \~~tp~ ~;,I ~ I W a ~ Z ~~ t r ~ 1 ~ l~~ I ~ ; w,aeo sF ~ ~, . ~ ~ -~ c~e~~ ~ , 1 ~ D ~ .~41,1~i9S 11 ~~ ! ( i r ~ y ,x+.e 1 .1` i ~~ 1 ~~~ ~ \1\1 11 l~ ~~, ~. ~~,p ~ ~~1 e B PHASE I -ELI w zu U~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~ L 1~ I r . G ~+nss ®saam n i 1 1 \ I' ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~~~~ ~ .1 , ~~I ~ i ~ 1 ~~1 I ~ s 1`~ Il ~~ ~~ ~1.~. v-~---_~ m a 6 neuse4~s ~ * , A~ A~` ,.o ~'~A~! ~,' ~ 1, 11~, ~: ~/~,~~~ ' ~ `\,.~11 ~'°°` I ~ : i, ~ E f ' 1 ~~~ ~ ~ n ~~/ ~• ~ mettax~r av"~~1,i' ~~ ~a~ II il~ ~~ `•r~ ~ _ ~ '' ~~ ~ I~ I` i~ 12' ~~~~ ~ s, ram~s~usw ~,'~ ~ ~ ~v en.~ ~ i n~us~ rze[s~ k~j j ~I~~ l 1 O ~,, 1 1~ '~' 1 v~' i mro~clar ~ ~ ~ \ ~' ~~~ ~:94~~ "' ~ III~W ~ ~~ ~~ I`~ ~ ~ ~~ `I l~l~~ll ~~~I I'~' ~ br~G~l +ly ~ 1 ~ / / i ~ ) ~ ~~ ~ ifl .~E 1~i! ~. ~ ~yq" ~ i ~~i ~~ >~~ d n er ,,~~, ,,~ ~ti~,, I,, , _ . . ,. , , , _~ ~- , . ~ , ~ ~~ ~ ~ a _ ~ ~ s~ ~I ~~y~~~ ~ ~e, a a~Es ~~~, ~ I, ~ ,~ _ _ _ _ ~,~. ,~ _ -- ,~~ f ~, ~ .I ~ ~ zn G 1 ~ ,. \ . \ a°°e ~ e»a (i ~ ~ ill \-L'I . ~ 1 ~~\ ~. Y ~~ I ~ ~1 ~ I ~~~~me. @>o ~ ~ui~ua -__ `r ~ j J I 1 ,~~ ~ ~~ r , ~ ~~ ~u w ~~~ ~/~, la-vs ~^IjI(p'~nJ nnn k ~ '`^Lyj ~. ~_ .9~ ' % ~ ~ L i ~ ~l 1 B L OLI~SL ikLL'a ~/ 2~' / ~ / I ~ I k ~ ~3C3.. 5 ~~-_~~_' ~, ~~ ~~ e i ~,r~ ~ / )• ~-~~ ^~ Drawing NUmWr: ~ 5~8 ® BKF ENGINEERS " 1'rQ a _ 1 1 ~1 e ` ~~- .~ 2 _ 1 l ~ 1 l Y I j h rc ~~ ~I ~ i ~ 1 k GRADING NOTES; ~ ~ ~NI 1 ~ Y~ Y N v } yl e X14 ` . :~~ o yI~;L~ a a QI NEW AC SURFACING AND PARKING STALL STRIPING rc ~$p 11111 1 ! II ~ i ,~ YI ~ ~ e_~,, O NEW PARKING AND UNDSCAPE ISUNDS °o_8~om I ill 1111 ~I. ~ ~`. 03 EK BUILDING REING DEMOUS4ED AND RENDDELID pw~~v I Ix ., ~ .~. ~ i a'~~$ I 1 ~'1 F 1 i 11 ~ ~ T ~ ~ Q4 NEW AC SEC710N AND PARKING ~ rn r I~~ Ikk. ~',~a~I., ~ ~~~ VI ~: ~1 1. ~I 1 1 t~ ° ~, i. ~ ~ 1~11~ kI S 0 6EGETATED BIDSWALE, 4' VADE NININUK 1 1 ~ I 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~r i~ ~ "^>~.•X- ~' -~ ~' I ~ ©NEW 5' WIDE SIDEWALK gym.; 1 Ipl n ~'~"~ °' 1 l1~ 1 1 z=1 111 I..i, ~9". \ ~\ a ~` 4~~ 11 aiy,P I ~~i ,. y ~~ ~ IiI, ~ ~ 1 i DO '~ ~ Y ~I' ~ ~;i l ~ u p 11~ ~. ~; ~.~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~., i' r 11,11v ri, ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ 1 11,~1i III ~ ~ , ., ~ 'e',~ uW.o S'tttt-~%~'', GRAPHIC SCALE ~'i 1 a I .. 1 ~. ..~~ . `.. ~~j~fCf?Et I .~ I II 111 ~ l ~, '..l i1 ,. a ~ / 1 1 t \~~ 1111j1 I '. ~\, \ `4 aft I ~ __ >. 'r ~ 1 1 1 i 111 ~ -1 ~ ~ SDf i TC ~y Ctc~~ i~ -, 4y(i 1 Cf l~ I ~~' ~. II I I j I ~ 1 ' ~' ~ ~ I •~ ">< i f -, i - 1 c .:.ter .~ I ~ ., ~ l lso6 . M R 1 111 r F, t'°" 1- ~ I 1 ~ l~ 11111 ~ h 5~'.. ~ ~, ~~~ `-~ •\ : I ., 1 ul a f ~.. ,x ° .n' ~~ I ~. I ~ -'• `.. `1 1111. 1 1 ~ I ~ Y h--y yr .;<e oY c'. Q II -~; .' ''~..;'S ~ ~ ~,~ _ h l rm,an ~ u v YY I aau+c ~~ Y a: ~ IIi1 1 ~ ~ .II ~1 .~,~- - <'~ S9.7FL •. , n A I Z I 1 u . e~ -br a . 1 1 t~'`t ~ a. `~ `. '' 11 ~ _ Ir -P4 -~_ ~ 1 u~r e r.E~ r ~ 1 _ ~;~ r ~ _ p l 1111 a ~,'`,~_ ~ r %~ ;A~ 2 1 i,"-'~k_~ _ r,_ ~ ~ -a ~o-~t„:c *<~,_ - ~ b;i ~• 11111 V~, ~ .. 1 - -- - - -~- 9 _: ~ ~. ,, " 1 P~ hr ~~ '1 , - .~, , {lam---! -~- --~-'---_ / I ,s\F ~ `°M~, 1 .., 1 X111 1j11 e j ~ ,~`._ O I I i 1 I I r 1 r~ .,M I I .. ~ ~_. / ..~\ , fi i .._ II 1 11 1.,1 11 ~ s, 1;I ~ li,, ~ ~~1 ~',.. ~ ~ ~ ~ p. 1: _I I 1 ! ~ I 1 1 c I +l _~ ~~- \ ~~ ~ ~ .r 1 ~' ~ 1 11~) 1 ~ H '. ~."1.'m ..; ' Ya ll~ 11,1 ` ,, .. - ~ , ~ ~- ~?` ~\ ~ N ~tt -+.- ~ ,, ~~' 1 `111,.11 f; ~ aw. f r +4 1 ~ ` ~ .. ~ '6 \. ~ 9E Y I ~'., 1 ,1,`118 J M 1, (1~~ ~ ~ y I4 f 1 i I '. t ~ v ' ~} t. ~ ~ . ~2r s~ ~f 3E 'te¢' ~ "1 ) iuy4' ., ~.1. ,.~ ~y x i '.0.,.:r ..~ ,_ _ y !. ~ -. ~ X1111 1 ~ Y', ~ ~ ~ - C t _ ~ ~' ¢ ~ Z 1i1 * "11 1 r -tx . 1 ?th 1 n``'' ,, ,p ., l 6 •~ ~ ~ ~y ~ O N ~ it ~~1 1" ~ i a .. \ 1 . r ~ Ar ,, ~.. J p Ml, X11 X11 ~+ r I / - li. 1 1 \_ ,p~~~ DIi _ ~ ~~r l~ ~.;j xs 1 ~ ~ ~ d U (~_ ~ IU11 _~ r ~ a~ l l 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 ~,! ~ ' t. ~` Q 1111.1 ~~n jl 1 v ................... ............ Ile.3. ``#, ., c'~`~ 1 A"1 c' II I Z N Z Q 11 µ J I ~~,. ....y 'I T `'+y C N. :kC; J ~4 1111 . Y 1 ~~ 'a ~ ~ ~ y .1 ~ 1I I~ {~ "~S .A.~~. ~ x ~Q 1 i1 ^ u !I rl ~ i ~~ ' ~~ ~' ! ~ -~ -' _ --1 ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ I i _ , i ~ m 7 ,, ~~5 ~~~ k ~ ~~ ~ I .. „~, 1{ ~ ~ I - ~ ~ 1 . '~ } ~ 'i r ~~ '. f 1 '..._ y .,' _ :_ .. y -. 11 "` . . _ I '~ ~~ . 1111 '~ l% 1 , • d' ' ', I I ~_r,.. '.GATE ...,. 1 ' - 1 '~ '' 1. y' ~ ' ~ ! . . . PNASE 9 ° UM7°-DV'>, s ~ w ~ :zlliw± a ~a r~ Y vas/ +y n ~1 PFkSF~Ih ~ .. , ~ d " _ ~~:1 ~ 111 'li, ~'3'w: . ~ 111 ~ II ~ ,1 7. E I- ».. 4 1o.r~ r Y n a-,. 1 _ l ~ II \ 11'1~~ i j.. 1 ~~/'~~"~" 1 _ i I I ~, ~~.~, .~I~ w t 11 ~1~, 0 1 ~17'~1 r ~ 1 F 4 ~ k+ 1 .l- 1~, ~Yk 1 ~ ~~~ . ~ ~ ~ N I , ( ~ flf . i ' J( 1 1 1 W + 1 `I `, r 1 - ~~ X ~~ ~ ~ ~:' I~ ri' 1 ~ 1 a ' 1 •~1 l ~ ~`~ ~ I I 1 I f ~ 13 ~ ~I ~ ~ '! 1 i 1 ~ ~ -•----i • i II In l u> ~ ~"dl ~ ~ i I ~ 1 j U ~±., ._ . . , i ' I ~ G~ ~ e~ ~ . c, I r t ~ ~ ~ G w ~ Gi ~~ , [C: t 1 ~~ ~, 1 ~ t 1 ~ ~ a . , . ~ ~ 1~' F II ; ~.f . ~, ~i ~ ~! ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ I a+~, 4 ' ~ ~ r 11 I p 1 } ~. ~ ~ 1 - sae t;,k I ~ I I I I F 1 11 I ~ I I '~ ~ 1 ~ e_t, 1 .~, V I ~ ` JT~ 1~, ~ I. `.~ 9.. ~ { y 1 I .4~ f Y~ ^ F '~ i , 1 ' I ~ t T ~ 2n b ~ ~ - ~ . ~,~ 1 - " "1 ~I. I ~ ,~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' , ~ i ~ \ ~ ~` A -.- , ~ ~ ~ l ~ _ f .. 1 ,h '. .°. •1 1-1 ~~ 1 • . ,--4~_ ~ ' - ~ , a,. .,i.,. ..:: i~ Y I 1 X9.,1 i»P a- ~ j -,-.. ~ I I 1 , I f w, j~ ~ 'b: ~ ~ ~- ., . - ) . I rl ~' ~ r r ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ~) j ~~ 1 °~~`~'L]IIIT DF I~ ~ 14\ II ~ ~ ~. ~a. ~ `, I 1 ~~ 1 A ' ~ 1 . , ~f ~ . ~, l I 1' ~ ~~ ~ ~, __ .. 1 ! ~ : 1 I I s' _ ~C~' r "c ~ 2 .u, eru ` ~ +, 3 ~ '~ 3022tTC ^a~ P I . - ~- • •~ 3. . • ~TE~~IVS~R EK BL-~ • ~ A j p~ ~ _ ,.,. ~1u ,>,~ ~. - ~ . . .: ~= E ziu ~ ~ .as .., - - - - r1+. - ( , _ _ _ ~ ~,. _ f B ~~~.c .~ ~. ~ .. ~. a ~' 111 1 m... y ~ ~ ~~,aj~ A ~ it I i .mi 1 . ~.; Y - •'~ __ . r. p '1 R sr.~ -z.~ ~ i , r~ , d { d ~ i 1 x 1 .. ~ 1. i-~ r-E1 T ;~ ~~~ R * • -,,,r-. _. ...~- .. ..- -- / ~ as = I I,%'I Drnrhlq NYm6¢: ~' ~+ 6 8 DF R. o~rr rnlronir , :~ +, ~ rr.''t'1 f ;<: ~'~ 1 A ~ '~1 ~ 11 1 '~ 1 1~,1 ~ 1' ° ~.t \ 1 L ` I 11 ~ I /' 11 :l `~ t 1 aIV r '' I DI4Y~) ~1 ~ 1r1,C f l i, ~ ~ . 1 t~ i '~11~4,11 ~'. I I q,11 1 1i ~, ~~~Illi 1 i 1 1 jll, }I ~, ,i ~~ ' ,i~ t 1 ~ riliil ~11 t .i ~~ 1 in r11fi ~t,1:~. i ~ - 1 °s1 ~ '~ d I 1 +~ I d 7 li \`.11 ~ n 11r1 t ~ 1 1~Ili 1 ce 1 111111 I' 1 i 11r,11 '' '` 1x, ~~ " 1 111 j11`ill 1'1~l 1 ' 1111~~1i1 1 11 1 1i11'11 I • 1 e ''11!u~i 4 1 111 II~ 1 1 1~111~Y1 1 r4111j11p ~~ E 1 5 pP..pinl i 1 ' ~1 ~~11r1~,~r~.~ I rrl ~ , __ , ~ 1~ 1,,r , . ~ i ~ 111 0 1VId1 dp' , ' i1a C1 P 1 1 u11 r11 1 ,1 - , 1, d ~'z 1'1' r lr 1II~ ~. ~~.r n 111f ~, I FI r n, , ,., ~ ,;, . ', , 1u~Ix 1 11 ~; far t ' 1,1111 11';r c ., ~ ,1 1 t v 1 y r i 1' t - ' 1 '' _ f j 1. . 4 , t I ~ '1 7 1F" 11 1 1 I 1!. 1~ X11 ~ !1~ i.l ~ P 1. 1 it a1 r ,, 1r~1. II 1 ,~ - '- Z~- ~- i~ ~ y11 ~ 0 „ ~~I Y ,jr v ~ A ~ ~ ~ ggamm '~ 1 ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~$ _ , n 1 i ~~;u4~ ` 1 ~ J r ` 1 I ~ \ + `_ - 1 ~'~\' ~` =~ 'i `' ' x ~ ~ '. .. ~ I ~~, I 7 ^i • I ~ m ~ , . ~~'~ r~' ~ :~ ~ xo rs~x~~ m' t i ~ ~ \ ,~ m ~ ~~~ W 1 r ~ ~ \ , ~ ~ +. GRAPffiC SCALE ~ ._ ° , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~. ry ~ ~ ~ t ~ rcc ~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~d - rl ' ~ ~} J I '1 1 ~ .'j1~ r %~ ~ ,-~. ~ ~ ,: C t. l.c, ~zzr~ JQ. ~ I . . CIS lm 01'x~°~ ' .. 1 . Y ~ \ r '.Q'.a 0 Cai.~f. a ~ \! r ~,, a, r e ~ x ~I i I - _ a ~ ' t 1 r I i ff 4~1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~, ; _ 1 1 ~ ~, 1 . ~ ,{ v ' t 1 ~,n -,, 1 ~ ~,. r I , I ... . . ~ ~ n 1 i - ° ~~ „ _ - -- \` ~ 1 1 L L 1 ~~ a r ~„ - 1 1 i 1 r 1 1. ~.''P,. + I i , ' ~ ' I. ~ ~ ~ 6 ~~ ~ F ~ ~. ~ ,~ ,i Y ~ -I 1 ~ ~ Db H "~ .-, r wu~ ` > Z a I r i 1 - a ..; ~ \ ~~ .~ Z _ ° ~'~ 2 tb'P ' ~' o i" I i. : ~ ' I , I. ~ ~ ) i , U / sa~~=amo • 4 ~ ~ , r , I ~ f ~ ~ 1 I .. 1 ~.._~. ~~o - .,,. s. ~ I ~ ~ d a ( ~ i 1 _-1 r' 'r-; "~ 1 o ; a• ;. I r I ~ ~ L ~y.`C. y., ;. ~ ~ r_J ° .~ ~ - ..~ ~ ~. ~ ~ J ., ~~, ® .. 1 ~ r ~~`~ ~'R'I ~ a ~ -~ ` z~ fo Q ~' n I ~ I I ` ~ ~~ ! ~ , ~ 1' W ~~ a a ,~ r ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ r' m s.a.olo ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ ,' i r ~ a 1 ' _ i° Vie 11.p10° PVC 50 5=0 01 M' J ~ r,, I .,. ,L l X ~ 1 ur+ ~' r ~ ` . ~'1 1 ~: I , 1 '1 r i ~ , . -. ~ h _ r. ~ , a >1, ~ ~ ' I 11 1ry~ _ r ~~ -:~ .I. l` ~ < 1 1 ~, ~ N ` ~ . I 1 l I - 1 ... . J 1 SC I 1 i 11 t ~A~ I ' 1 i ' PHASE 1~ {IA17°~OF- - '{ I I I I 1 ' ~ ~1 . ki j 1 I . G 1 ~ im er n- ~ r~ fl ~ i - . I1' - ti ~ l ' ~ ~, } ~ 1, F , I r y ,~ ~ cAP ) ~ r ~t° vv x 1 n 1 , !~ P AI II >~OM1J~ ~1 r ~ 1`'~' 114IF 10' PYC ~ ~ ~ : h > 1t1 ~ 1 ~S I 11 y IE ~~ 1 I',. Z uF1o's ~ ~ ~~ '~~ SD s•aolc i - ,q '^t _ ~ ~k ~ ~ I 1 t1Y F , 1 1 ~ . ~ ~ : I ~ 1 1 I ~ 1 - ~~ ti ~ : ' \ I 1~ a , 1 ,~ , ~ LL r b r - 1 ~ L it I~ ~ II r p'M. ~ AI. 1°'3E 1f. 1 ~ ~ k ° O ° •I ° , I ~ _ I~ ~ I 0 ~ _ 1 , ~. , I 1 I I I 1 T ? ~ ~ I ~ I I 7 V i f j 19 1 1 t ' ~ -~'"~ ~ 4 r I ' ~ ~ ~P" 4 } _ r ~ I f '~ ~ - c,~~ a ~IIfc J E,. I ' 1 11 1 ~ .~~~ ~ ; ~~ i 1 ; ~ . N ! r w ~ I ~~ ' - ~ . - I r, ~ .~ Mw ~ '; >I ~ ~e 1 I .1 ~ ' " ~~ ~ 1 , 1 ~ C P 1 ' I ~- ~ 5~ 1 QD10 ~ 1 EX 56.11t~E ~ 'ri ._ _ ~cy ~ ,zr~ '"".r °F rL ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ti r ~ I ~ . ~k .111 ~~~ 1 ~ . ~ - 0 P ~~ . y . . ~ ~ I , ,- \ ~ , ~ `~` I I r e T ~ I ~ yy ~ ~ I . 1 so's` aatp ~~ ~. r _ ~ r ~ i ! I~ ! rw ~ , ' ~~ ~ '~'' n. .~ ~ . C/~_~~~ 1 1 rE ~ 1 _ ,~ r' ~ ~ I "r.., 1 j ~ ~ ~ ~i - ~ I ~ ~ i 1 ~ ' ,1 ~ f 1 r. ~ ~ I A6 ~ w Lw , r , 1 .. L r J a A i ~C ~W ~U~tlel ~kY c' _, ~ ~ i 1 r . ' I ~"C ! r r::.: ~'.,° r J I ~.:I r rrr r ~ Y ~ ~ r I w~ 11 , v.'~ `c 2' ~''t I 1 'l I I I ~( ~ N, ' ,1!?' ~t`~11~9E~ ~11M1T OF ,~ I~ , O ;r 11 ~ I 1 11 ~ (1 ~ r ~ F ~ $ 1 ,: , I.r ~~ ~',4 '`' Irrrrµ _ -~ w y ~ , _ U a+Y ~ r ~~ a:k r ~~ r f ~~ I Y I ^' - - ,-f ~ ., - - a ~,. x ~ - r ~ - 1 , , T~8 ®BKF ENGINEERS ~9~~V~9~~~C§ i PLAX sscnoR STANDARD 24- FLAT GRATE DRDP INLET OF CUPERTIND•~RR~~ N 1 I ~I~ ". mr r~e w' N' -~Vr R Y--~ ~I a[cna CMI tp11M , bFC1KN A•A O rr iNlr ~ . MPfD~ Plan e1N.plar Imr nvr RR1 Ik ppNml e d w Cly EpIrN. ' _~~ ~ I 0 11 m ~ r r A 4 L coI II °O I ~ J I ~ °o °c i ~ o c I L7t' r I o c I I eo I __ _ - II __ ~__JI ucrlm p.R r E rk ~~,L I ~I~ ,3 a r=1~I ^ I ~i ECTKN R.A NRTRWTCY iM0-pl/ MRTE OCTN CITY OF CUP[IITINO aROn~1 ¢/e. ~eq I J-2 ,I .(YINCENTRIC NANHDLE ' e l1 e~--~ mi rwr~ _ ..~ ...-~1.- r~ 1 ~ •rI ~ ~, ~' ., .1 M MrlrMw ''r f )'' r, ~i C r wl --.. ~Y..~ a~'o. :'.:' oii.. 1..R~ ~q y. r;.,O' - Ali'>v~~ii~ . ~~ ~: N.r .N M x arw rwN K NNe !Y. SRNRiNIMiw4 YW W bYiR NA Y Ms CRY OF CUPERTIND AwwuRp erl le ]-10 STANDARD DETAILR I r 6 H` R-1~I ~ 1C L ~I A~~lb~I r-'~ li 6 •p.~/f, 1 • •. 1 Alb 1.00' 1 R•0.09 R.0.00 ~ 1 \0.3J' 1,3J' I~ TYPE E (MWMABIE ~ F R.1/r ~/A• ~ ~ T ~°'~."~! EXTRUDED CURB A3b 6 f 2a" I PoFpment IIR111 RAP/ ~ Y n vprioM° , ilA gutter IY . '.. R.I/e~ p0 0 D °OP °Ep0 0 D~~ '4' Llpn II Agq. pwe ub 6 11~ 2A' i IM , Y Y or mode II' .R-~ ~ C o So °Yoo < so /' L,ma II Agq. bme Ir ua 2r Y ~ p.f I R•17 1T R.t(Y~ -I~-- R•I/Y p 1 00 l''Lb:. R Agq. pme TYPE E I~ 1 R' 1 l• L II T 1~r~ u ~+:n r I e. 1/Y eew Nnum r I1nam, !. srr A.C. DIKE ATiR AS~GD Glr DF CUPfRRINO ~ APPADVED srAxoARD oerNEs .:.. p~^~,.7n a~':.;::'.'" ra4w..,ln... ~ml n.N ~~ ~ ~ Rru 1rw~%vilnw~ rNr,~,..c ~~ ", ttam.l[nt~iRUtnorvurt r,m4co~~ 11«amNrt .~lw. u,u~N~~s~. .,n. a~ , av.w~.e.ow,p mR ~.Rm. i _ = i ' t 1} nu.uvurciRrnsvox~exe:uvnmuw~mmvrcvrn. "---"I ~ A=-; ~.~. ewe~"'R1"xv, a. sw'~.x"~n~iw°:". ~__.._.._ ,~.__..___ .... ~F® i __ _ 1_ ~.___ 5 e L6TEGE VIEW ELEVATNIX VIEW A~BAEIFD VIEYr }ul TIpYRIY frR TNRRR~N rNReNnN v.rwsr E-+r nINRRV gbnlunN Nrwer rNww.n rrvA.l. •rnunrM TY%CAL DETAIL IMTH SQING TABLE '°'^ 01i"MI R..w a1.lNrNl.~ me.ll •+Ia INnmIRNI 01i""e° STDRMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM R r Irrrq VDRTSENTRY°~HS~~so.~le~w~« XNI 1 ® to Ne 1Tb II.11 IDO Ip IID 110 1Jp 19 N m R ~~N~N-~R [r xan a Im pm 1Ne lAa tae em RN u r u IN N m xw a NW uo ]a1 m9 ax eao zm Il.r 10 Rn 1M u 1m ~l'\ FoRWPDRNAraNALPUAPOa~olNr•xmNrtelomwRCaxnRUCnox ~. , ~,,,„ RtNSU L 1-1R ever •w• RrMntlN 31W. 0-W eRall Pwur ie' eY Yule !' N. a. vn m ^r fnNrrd m`N' NF N' m 9' - N' rNN InM 71' ~ 1r ypEA'AV( Nv ]r fr R {{. RFNR:IIDI PULE < ~Ytr~ ,pill a fUf ~, JgNI 1)e' ra t'o~ar'ac. ~ ~. ~ nrt 9pCRNK / ~e~ ~ ~/' egRY r mnAOMrH 1. lbnrnlR dlwnt In0~sVN O1N Nin IIrOrR r anIFRN10. A {gFyMNNb M fanN pvF INf~ ' A vOP Y Wa ~~ M~ M 1A1e- A 1'~Ane p1opN0Y M M a NiOium N r 5. POwiOR m N n bLNM ~bNN ra N RA' lro a m •~, NN MN. -•• rsx eRrA. W.pRN~ RCirpN A•A DRIVEWAY DETAIL - MDNDLIT'NIC SIDEWALK uwm ArT rpOT Gtt Di GAIENRNO AP DA ~ I-21 srANDARO oLTNES Gtt ENCn ~' ~ ~+ ~ n ga ~8& Og~or C f II ad~$~ m~ ^! ~:~ Q I 0 4 J a U y ON o N~ ZN<Q ~=Da Wa i a N U S 2 1' MDDMUI ~ 6' gtA55/IURF Z ~ ~~ ~~ W a U 6' PERFDRAIED ~ %PE SWALE BACKFAL NAIERIAL TO NEET DRAINAq: INTENSItt AS MIRAFl AN40 n SPEgFlED BY GEDTECNNICAL FABRIC = ENdNEER 7 BACI(FlLL MATERIAL AS APPRDVED BY GEDTEgiNICAL ENgNEER DRAINAp; PIPE 3 VEG~TATID 3WALE NOT TO SCALE 11 a ~ E ~ @ gy_S P C-8 8 DF tf1 akr ruriurrac ABBREVATIONS & LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT UNE CONTOUR UNE `~ STORM DRAIN MAIN - - ?c' m (pW) - - SANITARY SEWER MAIN - +~' is L~1_ - WATER MAIN e'w (~a) JOINT TRENCH -roc GAS UNE s'c ~es]_ _ WATER VALVE pd FlRE HYDRANT SIGN '4- ELECTROUER ~ GAS VALVE ~ FENCE UNE -z- ASPHALTIC CONCRETE AC AREA DRAIN AD BUILDING CORNER BLDG COR CATCH BASIN CB CONCRETE C/GONG CHAIN LINK FENCE CLF ELECTRIC E/ELEC EDGE OF PAVEMENT Ep FOUND pNp GAS G HANDICAP RAMP HCR HIGH POINT Hp INVERT INV UP OF GUTTER LG MANHOLE MH POWER POLE pp PUBLIC SERNCE,UTIUTY EASEMENT P.S.U.E. RIM R STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN SDCB STORM DRAIN DROP INLET SDDI STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SDMH SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SSCO SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH TOP OF CURB/FACE OF CURB TC/FC WATER VALVE yry PURPOSE PROJECT - TO CREATE 2 PARCELS -ONE PARCEL TO BE FURTHER SUBDIVDED INTO 4 CONDOMINIUM UNITS. .far ~$ 0 INi CUPERTINO OAKS TENTATIVE MAP CITY OF CUPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NOTES ~widu e 9M A f ~' ~ `~ ''~ ~ R ~ ' ~ , . , ~ . ~ ~~' 3 B8 ~~~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'trwyq~ { b! ~g ~,auu llrt , P ,. I ~~@c~ - I . A ~~- _ I - a `' iwa ~ .., . arc ww" c nn~r„u ;:°w. ~ ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ a~ s rw~ b ?.. ~ _. ~y..no wrra 1 1 , ~ ,. 'MM: (. ~ ~ 4 . ~ 11,l0 E Z ~' ¢t ~ E ~ ? ~ { 'N 9 Wx~cu ; °' E iP '. I ~t #': rv- - ~e Oran l+ww„ 4 r rm~„ alr,q t ~ +!~ 3 E ~ 4 ~ M ~~ ~ t M 1 d~ ~ k ' ~ ~ ~ d~ MR wW ~ ~ ,,, a :: ~ , ~j.$ ~ 3b wwar VICINITY MAP N.T.S. GENERAL NOTES 1. OWNER: MADENA INVESTMENT, LP AND SUNNYVALE HOLD 1455D OAK STREET SARATOGA, CA 95070 2. SUBDIVIDER: SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY ATTN: PETER PAU 489 S. EL CAMINO REAL SAN MATED, CA 94402 (65D) 344-1500 3. MAP PREPARED BY: MARTIN B. PARISSENII, P.E. R.C.E. 30747 BKF ENGINEERS CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1650 TECHNOLOGY DR., SUITE 650 SAN JOSE, CA 95110 (4oe) as7-sloo LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOTAL PARCEL: 8.10 ACRES PARCEL 1: 2.60 ACRES PARCEL 2: 5.50 ACRES 1. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 326-27-035 2. SUBDIVISION NUMBER: PM296-M-41 3. EXISTING LAND USE: COMMERCAL 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: GENERAL COMMERCIAL 5. IXISTING ZONING: CG-GENERAL COMMERCIAL 6. WATER: CITY OF CUPER11N0 7. SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF CUPERTINO 8. STORM DRAIN: CITY OF CUPERTINO 9. GAS k ELECTRIC: PACIFlC GAS AND ELECTRIC 10. TELEPHONE: ATd~T 11. GABLE N: 12 STREET TREES: INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARDS 13. EXISTING WELLS ON-STE: NONE 14. STREET LIGHTS: INSTALLED PER GTY STANDARDS 15. SOUND WALLS AND MASONARY WALLS; ADJACENT TO FREEWAY 16. FLOOD ZONE: ZONE B 17. DATUM: FOUND BRASS DISC STAMPED 'BM 180 RESET 2001', TOP OF CURB SOUTHERLY SIDE STEVENS CREEK BLVD, 20't WESTERLY OF RAILROAD TRACKS (BETWEEN IMPERIAL AND BUBB). TABLE OF CONTENTS o ~ n $ ~8S III ~~~~s m~~~~ m~ ~:, ^i Z O J a U Y a O~w° W< W Ii Z~NN I-aWo aZ~? U u SyEEI DESCRIPTION TM-1 TITLE SHEET ~ TM-2 MAP SHEET TM y 4 55 R -3 PRELIMINARY GRADING i g ` ~ AND DRAINAGE PLAN Q TM-4 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ~ ~ ~ ~ P TM-1 a ~ ®BKF ENGINEERS i 111 ,, 1 I 1 a X11 i, ~.Iyg~ ~ I i I J IffF I IIR~ - 69 ~- '~ ~ I. 1 }. 1' o ~'I 111`' 1 ` ; ~p1 ~~ , ~ `. ~ m .,. I ~ ~ It ~ ~ 8a ~ 1 I 1 ~I V ~- I ~wa I y Idv 1~l (1 ~ L red 1~ L z ` ~ 11 ,11 ` ~ + X11 ~,. ~ ~. ~ NOTES: ~~~:: ~~ 11 1 1 llll ill li, ~~, ~ 1. ,~, ~ J ' o II 1~ l 11 I~+II ~~j~ '~~ly a ~1. ~ 1 ,.ti r ~~ ~ BUILDING TO BE REMOYID ~ '~~~5°v 1 ~ 1 I+UI: 'IPI `,~'~ 1 A ~ 1 X TREE TD BE Rd10YED E ..111 1 y 'll ~~ ~ I~, I~~~ \ ~` `~ ~. II ~ \`~u~ 1 111.1 "T .+L \ 1 a MI 1, IItN ~~ g ~ ~ \ 1 ~ ,*a l} I ~~ y 1 1 FI Illill111 ~ I %~ ~ \ , e.. r- Y ~ ~i1 1 t yl I I ( I T . t':'a 7 .j1 IIIE 1~ ~ ~ ~ 'it hl [E'Z'$'~C i~l '. vt" .yllllldt~,i ~~.a -1'.`~\ t+.~'Er cr "'( ~ _. 1 i,lll dll~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ Y \ ~~ ' I I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ru _ ~ III 111 E1~ :~,. i ° 1 Z 1 __d "'1; GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ~'~ 1 1111 3 114 ~ A tiSx ~ s- ~ f I ` 1: 1, i 5~:`( T r `~~! '7 * s _~f, ~. ,_,j I G^"'T; -. '.-I,.. 1 _ 'I . ~ _~ `'e lF I u ,:: t iPf~ 1~ 7 ~. '~. , ,a~` ~ 11a r ,,,,,' ~ :+ ~, , _ nls J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rr ~ rvr. ~In ~L.~,L E[,. Er I IX tar ~ ~~~ . hf. Y } '~`., 4' .Ill / ~~ _ - ,F':.MC (IF f QG 1 e -_ l hah ~ 4f R 1 1 ~ 1 ~.w A ~ _ ~~hh 115 11 - '~ .,.. .. \ 11 ~, 1 ~T'~~~bn~. 1~'1 ~ j~9r"~r, I ~ .,}~~~`~4JI I I I ~ ," x .,~I i '~T~ ~~ ~;.. .~u~-3~' ~'.~.Jrz¢ ~=~ ~ ~-Fr ~~C?~.rl 1: 1 Z Y, ~ I 1 I ' __ >n 1 en, 1 , IIIIN ..I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ f II o ~ 4111i~Y+n ~ V. ri 1 1 ~ iA ~~ I ~. i 1, ~ 1111: 1,. 1 `4 -, ~T I u ', `.,z 1 t T~ ~ -_ -__ .-,;,,_.-•.,-. _. ~ __ h :,1ry 1 ~ L-"_r U 1 LA1141i. nlp t I C. j. 1 ~ P~ ll ~ ~ I '~'~fi'.I I 1 l ~ r , 111"'1'^'1"' II '~~V~1 ~ J"" ~ i f j ~ ~--._. _-'~ L, _ f '., ~ I~N,It l '~~ ~ ~ Xa-• ~`~K ' i `"My - ( "j 4 1_Ly' 1 l i S I i 1~b9Y1 SS~~i, [ 11--~`~ ~~ ~ a„ ~. 11 )11~ ~ 11-[• .f'" 4 -- ,1 ~,( 11 2 5? I Ir f I `/' _ .. ~ `` ~ _ ~'~ w t I 1 ~ - ) f ~'.I ~ I I ~Fe ~ yam. ....:~ w'~'r~ -.~:~ 'r ~ ~ ~p+, ~ i y . ~ `L 1 ~ l I ~,'., ~" h ~ «.: ° ~. I. i (~ ~ 5 i "~~$R~ -~„ 'J ~-L'~ ~ ~ ~k"~I' '~ ~ ~1"""' `-.~-- ~*' -~, Tom-- <-'C-'i-u ( n' ~H' 11. [ ~ 1 i :i ', Y ~ya~, ,- m~~ 1 rs 1 . t -Z' l 1 ~! . e .sE 1 i ,11 l,yi '~ F ~1 yl 4Y _ ~ qy f . .,, . ~ i ~ 4.~fEU;S i?C 1 ' I. \ 1: '1 ~'1 ~ , 1 '. 11 ~~ rl \ly ,~•_t 11 `~ ~ l '~ 11~~'. , ~ i I. f, ~4ic I Ih''.e -c, \ ~ e , i' r \L rs p l^ .111 y kY ~fif k _ j '~ ,111 1 {.~ ~..:± Ib.-i. c~. }~`•.1.,,. cr°! ~ ~ ~.~.., ~.- ~~ a~~-~ ~.~ ~` Prx~ :ec• IA ^ ', lull 11 jl.~~ L. _ 1 f a 1 6 r _,` ~. I ~. ! m , f,•i Y LL Q 11 1 l 1 1 1~, k ~„ ... F S 1 1 ti '.1 1 1 11 i M ~ T~ i ~i ~ ~ `'v; : i / 0' ~'~. 1` ll~ *~ E -i '~c ~, ~`" ~F ~. 1 ll, ; y ~ 1 1 ~ : ,~ I 1. P }- I ~ I ~ \ Q I 1 ,~ 110.1 4 ~`I J.i ( 1.. 1 1 I r 1 ~ y.-~, 1 J '- 1 1. II 1 :.. - f I u 1 - ~~ ~ I S 1 y 1y1 Q! U . L. ~ x ~ M 1 ~ i . -1, ~. 1 A ., .. ~ ~,~ t .- ----- _ ~I i ' 1 l .. ; -'I; ~r r G~~~ ~~ E acE ~ W ~ 1 11 f ~'' •.v I f~'ARCC-E, ,1'.y ' ~. ~ ~~If"n~1 _ _ sue: ~~ v~ ' ~Ey1 1 I11 4 .. G 5..~ l {,Is ~ ~, ~:u,S Ta;i; w Z y` ~ 1 IJ I l i !- ' I I jy~(f 1 '~' .~ t I) I 0 I +' ~(~ _. -'G ~F~' MR~A , ~yy 71 i ~''. _~ ~ ~ . r r \ T ~, ~ ~ I,~. ''~,r 1 ~sl ~ ~ ~ wQi 111 1 f l~ < 1 ~.I ~ 1.71r I _w: ~ 10.00' E 1 k`f r'~ ~ (> mr~~ 11 I 11 ~,'1~~T1 ~~il t 1~ ti:`.~ ' I x "y~ ~ I t` 1 r'" ~ ~~> F , ~ , , 1 I r-, ,~ . - PARCEL 2 ~ °~ I ~` ~ ~ - w Z 1 t ~ ~~; ~S, ~~,,~ F ~, ~A I ~-~.II ^~ >~ ~ - 11 'I 4 ., II - d Z ~~ l 1 a ~y 1 I_~I(. s~, t~~'C ~~~ ! ~ .r'IE - _ ...-•-~AAE~ ~_ .Ir_ r` a zl ~~f ~ [ I 11~"~ IL,' ~ W 0 ` ~ i--'1 'q~' ~1 ~ 'I , ~- ~ PAJ~ES1 - -_ m 1 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ - r `w ~ , ~~1 ~ >a i - ~ F I 1 I I~ 1 1 -.~ vnb,\.. eft- .a _.....I __ I.I ".."-,.x ~.~ / ~~Nk ~N., ~" ~ I 22• ~~ _. '. ~. I 1 11 1 I 711 7°' _ _-__ 1 ~ r, >, -~ 11` .1 I ~ _ I !1.. 1 ~jl~l sa I `L~.., .~'~ ~ _ ~la~~ I `~--.~~ ~_ 1 "='", ~ < r ,~~~ ~~. ~ 11 I'~' 1 ' 1111`' ~~ ' 11 '•- I ~ 1 ,f`~, __ I-l TJE I . r. ~ ~.tuFU 6 1 j~^ 1 111 ,~ I I 1 E 111 I~'~' X1'1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ I -ll ~ I m.Qdl.! ! ~1 I ~ r~E. a[ y1I I; I~~~li 1 I II ~1~ ~ 1- c f 1 ~ ~~I 1 Al 1 Y ~'. -OOO tF ~_~_ ~ ~ ~~ I r 1 ., ~ ~ ~ ~ 11~ * I - ~- 1 ~- H ~~ _ 1 b 1 A ~~Ae ~, rr k Y 1 1 ~ r Id / 0 i , it 11 e~a,= 11r y1~0 B bEYELOPlD I ~~~ I ~e1 ~ ~~ „6-k?~ASF~S) ~ `',~ ' ~ - ~ ~ E v I ~ ~ ~ ~,_ e ~ ~i 11~ 1 n,ll 1 ~ ~-- 1 \ 1 ,i3 1 1 a 11 ~ ~ ~,.r ~ ~ ' 1 it I II ~1 ~~ I 11 ~ I Z l ~ ~ I~V I~ ~~~-~ ~~ 1, ""'~~. n :~ i ~ 1 ! 1 ~ ~ ( 11? I, ~ ~~1 W,.r ~t~ ( ~I T• 1' 1, ~~~~ ~~~ I FtAl1~~~ I -[~'i W ~. l ~ ._ . -_-__~ .. y~ ~ ~ I: ~ i E I I tl ~ I ll1[tl C RL: 7 . 1. i ~s 11 i-,. ) 1. °~ ,' rare ~ e l r ~ _._ .............. 1'' I~'9..~; ! ,~~ ~, a ~I ,: , 1 ~I.. ~ ~ U 6 1 } 1 1 f i Y W l '. I 1 ~.I I 11 Ilr, '.I~~IW5.1 ~~~- ;~~~ o "~--.-~-.Il ~ ~~ ~ ~ .. ~, i r 1 ~~~ v I ~ I ~ ~ (~ ~ , ~~ 1 tl ~1' _ i-q t ° c 1 a 1 Y~ 1 1 II 1 I , 11 ~ 1 1 11e 1y ~ f ~ , ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 1 ~_ 1 1 ' ° ,.~ ' ss ~ ; IJ '. l F ~ ~ f r(' I -_.: 1 1 Y ]0~ rl 1'kl'f I JI 1 f , I Tom-. ~~ ~y 1a ~{ ~~ 1 11 hl' ~'}. ~ ~r.1 ` ~ I\ .~ \ zs,: 1 ~~ t 1 ~~r ~ ~ ~~,,..e A ~ I inl .` r I ~'"q~~. ~~~~-- ..L .m.. -~ ~ l~ 1 (~: 1 I !. i 1 (~ k ~ , :. ie~~ e:a: ~ ~+ ~,I~,~ 17r -^*" I1' I ~j i I , II •.. ~ Q F1iC AEa'L 9E x ~ ! ~ `~ _ .M I J~ ~ ~I ail ~ ~ 'w ~.i ..uu`~ Y 1. 1 1 I I i I A ~ I A ~-,'^t , .. ..H J j ~ .~ ~ s -3: -~ ~ - e._ ? . ~T<~~%. •~A f ! II i/ r''ll. I ~ Jr v i 1'"~ I I;; ~yr Ij : r ! ~ 1 ' .y ~ e ~1`I ~ ~~ ~ i Lye ~ t ~ ; : E: ~~~ - ~ ;~ L, x1b [ .....n ~9- rum ~~W1 i == •~ !..' -~'„_-~ _~` ~ 1 ,,, 'Ea<.E raEr e ( ~ 1 ~ ~ I ' ~: . r ar uup. IJ _ 't7_ffi3F~+°L ~hti _~-- - ~ 7 - ~;~~ '- ~~~ 44.95 ~?~ •. .. -. - - r ._ o. , ,• __ _ .,: ^'•. it r., -~- . -,.r~ -~-_ ~~ --==:~ __ 1 -~) vs. Il I Is r-_ 1 ,a: 1 _ 1 ~.,--•('--,-a~ 1 ..tea.' 1 _ ~."~~ -T~~._r1=~~1 ~ 1 I 1 ~ ~ § ~ A R, STEVENS CREEK BLVD D~.„o Rum6r TM-2 2a4 F1 ovr r /, .~ 2 ,. _ _ _ _ ~' 1 u ~'~ ,~ -, , a;~ F v.~~ 1c +~_ .. ^ 1 h \ ~~ 1 ~'~ 1~ WAJ 1 2 \~ I~ 1 r I i ~ 11 1 1 111 `~1 r, ~ j GRADING NOTES: g ~,. l 1 1 r ~, ~~ ry N v 111111,1 ~ 1 ,may 1Q NEW AC SURFAgNG AND PARKING STALL S7RIPINC j ~8~ ~I 1 I~° 1 T u`,`I O NEW PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ~ u 1 r „ ~ ~ I~~1 1 ~ 11 ~~111 ~~ ~ I ,~. A C 30 EK BUWDINC REING DEAIWSHED AND REIAODELED ~ o~ 11 I 1 ~ r1 ~J1~11 ~/ ~- ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~ ~ NEW AC SECPON AND PARKING ~ ~~~g~ 1~a _ 3~-~R,~-F~ -'~~ i 91 ~ 1 ~ 1, r"~ 111 ~ T ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ f !I, ~1 ~':, 5~ YEGETA7FD BIOSWALE. 4' WIDE MINWUY 1 ! _ ,J 1 i~ ,111, 11f1j - ~ ~~ \ ~ ~, -<t~-. J`F. ©NEW 5' N1DE SIDEWALK N^ 1 r 1 1 \ 4~ 1 1 0. ~, ~ ~~A 4 1 ' r 1 'I ` w `C .NHS x`45 ~~ N 11 ! 1 ~ ~Y II ~ ~ \ 4 1 ~ ~ (rlGs~1 ~~ 1 I II~F~~ ` ~ rJ~~I,~~,'"""'''''''''~~~ ~ w ~~ ~l 1 ~ ~ .L trKUU i l Y [/r.F ~ ~,, ~ 11 111 1i ~I ~ ~ ~ `.q I I •G w t ;A ~ ~.` _ - GRAPHIC SCALE N 4 1~ 1 111 ~ 1 v ~~ P ~~ i 11 1 1. ~~ ~ ~ ~30Pi}TC s~ I `' `~ 11 r 1 ~ a rm I ~~~ 1 1 ~~ 1 s Y~ I\ h ~- .\ 4 ~- .-_ ~ l` ",aA'1 I I _ J ( l lua- . N R 1 11F 1 5 1 IEE,.i II 1 \ M1 •,Y J \ . ris r ~V _ I ~, ~v.. _-- .t? 1 ._ J 1 1 4111 ; ~ `1 ] ~ / u . Lk_. ~' 11 1' P ' ! a ,~ ~~ ~ r I 7Fl ~;. ...' --- hl a wv[ ~ ..1~ la ~ Q ,~ z,h>F1. 1[.~G 1 A ~ Ir .. ,.~~ ~ G Ir E re- s ~~ ~~ ~ P ~ w~ ' 1 '< ~ - , ~ r 11 11'11111 ~' S 1 ~. ~. y _ ~_ I ' , 4 -_ O 1 Y.I IIK & r 1 .. 4 .. _ > - -h" `-~ 1. 1 nY .~ __ z - "?.tom ~- Q :,, _ _ 1 1 1 Iii 1111e § Ir 1r ~ ~ .~~ ~f-' i ~~ •,__~ - _ - ~ - .. .... . _ es' '~ -c '. . I '. U ~ ~jf ~'; ~' ~II~RY ~d~ ~ I _ .11 UI'61.11' t 1~.r I .k ~~ r - - / .- k '<\ "'~~ _ 1 'p. Ir 11 ~ -- 1 `'~F. ~\ : ~ I I 1 1 r . ~ ~_ 1 .- _'_~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .11y~ ~~ I W ~1 i 1 V ~ ~ 1 IE ter- ~,' ~ - J. 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ;~ ~. 1 I -r r - ~ , ' _ ~' 1 ~ , [ I r , 1 e 1111 11 1 ~ :14 ~~~ r ~'gr,,y.~',~(.r' `J, ~ ' ~ a - ~ - -:'~ ; y\ ~.' ~ ~ ;' ~ zees y 1 ~ i ~ ~" 1 ~ 1'.~ 1 ~~ ' 1 r~C"'T • I Y~ 1+[. "~G ~ 1, ~' 1 es~~ ~ f L t, ~`I ~' \ i ~' c- ~ ~ ~~ w . 1~MI 111'I 11 ~ 1.. r rrene + , ;±~{"-" / V b ~ ~ .1 '~~ ~.1 ~. p r xti ' U 1'~ 1 vllll 'r ~ t ~'~ t`,.~' C 1 1 113 v 1 - - VI^ ~ 1~ ' "` ~ 1 1 111 !; ~ ~ kj ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 ` 1 ~ I ~ 2 ~1 1i Ir +1 F ~' , ~~ ~Y' µ hh f :MIS ~ r PLL ~ Q O I 1 t ~: I 1 ~ j .J.,- ~7h~- 1 - ~h L ~ Vl A ; t 1 q ' r( - "~Y 1F! I j 9 4 ~ 1 us ~., tt" ~iA .,, I f Zlt ,. wc, 1 i ~j, I , y ~ ~~ s., Ih' _f, 's ~ ~ ~ ~ Q QU 1 11~ 14 II - r I ! 1 f I 'd1,~1 '1 4 11 1'r' 1ra~ ~ 14 ,m ~ I ~ 1 ~:a ~ ~ W I ~ ` ~ -. 1•. 1~~ ' 1~1 ,~r`` 1 ~ .g kl {1 • r.3 ® II '., d W ~ ~ ~ 1 W r Z 1 I'I m: ~ , i `` , ~ Z ~ ~ 1 ~6~ y ;- ` i '.Y 11 v~ 111 y j x. _ ~ ,,,, ~.he ~~ ~ u. I ~ '.~ .} ~. 1 .. t I ~'I^ 4 a e l } ~. ~ F. - 1~~. ~~. 1, rwm~SCA~ ` rr- - +.~~~^ `Ci'•'T._. ~-"~'~-~~1 - T .i ,~~ •'' 1 ',L rr t~. 111 ` ~:;J~ f 1, __,_. ~ `,, .,~ ~ ~ Y -f 1f,, 1. i ~ ~~ ~~,` ~1 ,1 11 1~ 1 J 1 l 11z ~ 'Ikr ~ ' 1 ~ W 111 '.4 ~' ,• ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ '~L n[A e ~11~11M 1 ~~I 1u7~~1e `~1 ~)~ .;.~ I ~'~ 141 ~~ Irx ~ -1f ''I 4 v ~~. 1 ,•~ ~ ~ i L. 1L 11 11 ~ I~IP ~O I n1 I ~ ~ v, ~- `~ v 1 ' ~ ':I '. ~ 1 ~, 1 IrI. dZ v ~1 , ~ ~r-~~ e~ 1 ~ ~ C ~ .fit ~II I I I Iii : ' F- 1111. ..• 1r''4•~~r1 1V, ,11 ~'~''.zooz ~~, 1b 9_,I If,~ tyl 1 I. ^r y I lM~...".'.' i ~..IIriI Ilw III I`,'I,1 ~ ~ i 1{{ ff y 1 I ` 1 JC ~} 1 ~ ~, 1r 4 . 1 4.1~?' s f 1: i I ~ I ~ r~ I ~ } , I r~ 1, ' ;_, I ~A" ~ , ,~ ~~ ~ I w!D n 1 1 1 s1~I 1 ter`' 1 a;~r 4. r r ~ + !~, '~• r ~ ~ Ir ~~yre 1,~ ~ r~I ~ _ W .. I 11 ` ~ 1 I r 1~ ~111~ 1.~i ~ \~~1111~' 1~4. ~ 11 ~°'~ 1 ~.. ~ ~-'. _~'I v ~l~~r N .~" ~ s ~ .....-_ ~~...~ ~~. <~-~ ~r ~ ~ .~IJF . 1~~ {~~ r ~~~ ~ J~~ I -r 1 A~11T. ~ ~ r ~' ~ T =v' 17~' '~.1 d~1 ~~' ;~~ ! ~ j `1 ~ p~ ~ V I 1 ~e 1 I r'X" r 1 .,,. 1 ~- 1~~. 1±~ lu,' h`~ II, T r •~ I'~7~v .I _,r I ~i f ~.~ _, _ ~ 1 I. _ C ~.~ ~ ~~~~~~ I n, I ~`~ ~ Q ~~~I ,~ ~P I I V,1 r,` i~ ~ \ Y` .. ~- \ r 'k~ , ~:{~~`-,. .~ r ~ ~ ,~~k. ~ tur ~ UF~S e .. ~ 1} ~/ 1T r ~ I' I ~, l i r I ' I ~ k r sq~ 1 ~ ~ \~ '~ _'~ ~ ~ ~~F.[ fEC; ?~~ ~~ I I ' r r.r ~ I~ r I Ir r r ~ I ~ i ~ r 1 •~ h ~ yt w ;! '~1"' ~ 1 +.~eA107 ~ ~~ 1 1 _Ar ~.:•=' y~ _ ~ I r ~~.~ r ~~~yyy-Jre~ T ~ ~~,Y'., -r J y ~ ~ 4~ ., /n r.,, I _1 _.r- ....w _ _ .~ ...... .. .""- ~-r. .' -, ~ ,r 30131- ' .?-~+` ~+ } ~. ---r-~' ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ eFORA~" ~-R~-- J Y-R ---~ e,- -• ~~~.. ~TOR9IAN _~ ~ ~f ,. I t,-~----r `, sY' r ,„' _`~" ..°`:, a,l - .. , , , S~REEK - ••,~. -- ee.. . 1 q .. ~ 1 7; n -. _ „. / zoA.a M I '1 OrmAlnq Numbr. ~ . , - - ~%~ ,..~ , TM-3 ~~ 3 ~ 4 ®BKF ENGINEERS ~~ ~ `~'. ~, Y ' lip ~~ ~' ~ r ~ i ~~Y ~ ~ X80 ~ ~ ~ ,.~ z ~~~ j { ~{ ~~~~...~ ~ ~~ r---~~. W~i~nr 1 1~k 1 ~~a ~g 1 ~ 1 ~~~YY 11 1 11 1 ~ 1 ~ ` qy y ~~~ ~~ I I ~` ~' ~~~' ~ l ~ u~i~~~ I' ,~„ I < Y I'` `` Pe. , ~,1 1111 I.1 •~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ 3^^ ,~ ~ ~ :e~t ,,,;,~ ;~-~ x~, ~ ~~~~ .~. 1i ~" i I~ '~ +~', ~ ; _Ap rr civr~ru t ~ ~, GRAPffiC SCALE /' i _- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~` I- ,° ~ f ,~~ ~_ i •.s •';. ~ +t.,~ _ ~ ~~ ' 1 ~~ zee r r xuuxu ues.uxe Q M i 4,lLF,)~ ` ~ 7 ~ ~ 71 . .. \,'.'~,1-~ i` ~ „ -" .--i ~ j CPC~HC DET'r~F[ 3, i I Z ~ _ .. i x~j 1 ~ ,_ - r.., ~ •~ • -s,-~ ~_i ~ I O z~ , r . ~ - i ~- Az -.J ~ _ ~ ., p i t 6 w~ e ~4 r ~__ - ,11~ ,~ :e~; s ;_- I I ~ -s, -F~ _,~ - - - __= ,fix, o i iii A1~`~` ~~ r1 y4. ^^ ~ ,I ` _```~~_..® ~_ • ~ - '_ ~` _ _ 4 . ~L} _J 1~ ' ~ v~~l~"nF',~ ~ '1 I d51~ 0010 - 2~1f 1d' t~ ~ ~~~ -~"a -- _- __ - .~.r.-~+,~„- __ ~„ a.t~)~~ ~-, ~ a ~ ~ ~ Q~1 I ~~ I 'v a _ i Y ~ ,+v + ~'= -_ tee 'l ~:¢Lt o-'L% ~I P 4 l ~ - \~ ~' !~~p:~'_~_ r~ N Y>m+ ~•~ ` 1'~.~' ~ 1 > , ' ~ J i `Y, ":' ~ 'fit e _. '~ ~ 1 ~': ;^~ . ~~..7 //~ a v. vas ~ v ~,y ,-~ ~- ~ ~w r ~~ ~ ,.:. \ 1 i ~ e Y e ~ 1 ~' i ~~1~ ~ i - a ~ ~"'7~ i - E%., 55MH r o ~• ~ i ~ ~.i ,°: ~6.4r ua.r ,: b ~; : > : ~'r _., `1 Ilu p t ~. = ....,~. ~ . P gyn. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i v ~ v ~~ ~ ~ ~ I y ~`'•, v}\ a ~; - i W ~ F- i, ~'~ I ~ t . N c~ I' i f, r ~ t ~ ~ ; . ,,,, i~ Z v ~ ° I~ 0 1 'i ~ 1 n S~ I 1 _ ~ a 1i ~ ~ ~ x r - 50` D10 I : _ ' ~ ~ '`~' t`z v' I ~ ~ ~ N 1 _ i , f ~ { I ~ :.. ': ~ ~ • ~. ~ • ... ~ ~ .c i} , r' 1 ~ r sy±&r r,~cr, iRau ., F^ a 4 II z1 n•a p yp ~ ' m I L t ~ ~s1 ~ 4 ~- ~ ~~ ) ~~i ti ~ r '~ f n u rare I r Q~ O i ~ ;y _ __ ~ _ , u ~ v { ~ ~ ,;. s - ~ j'~ ~ ~r • i ~ -~1_ f ~ SD 5~0.01~ , , i ,e ~ s ~ ~' ~ t 5 t r ,+ ~ ~t~ ~ ~ .~ , ~ ~1 e,r. I t ~ ti Y I i , ~',1 ~i y~r.nTE .<~ A !. ,,..~. C,~.r'...-.-pace ~-_f ,' .~ t. 1 v ~ ~ I Y~, ~ ~ V r 1 ~ ` ~ ~' ` r { ~ ~ ~ r :~"' i'~ FLAT INdJF1L Ei ~. ~ `~1 ~ I, rr ~ ~ ~ ~ }~ ~~~ e - saa S~, t r~ w~r~w'L ~.. En.Ehu= ~ j •:'.., t<. 7~ ~ 1 ~, II ,S y_~J >.^ ~ --- ~ ~`` ~ 1`> ` ¢{ ura,n~ 1 is t1~~1'j ~ l~' a 171.E 10' PVC ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~~ I : - ~`174F' 10 asr~i ~ 50 50.010 I ~ •1'_" ~ ~ ' I ., _ ~ I ' ~u ~ ~i~; ~ F ~ ~ { ~~~. I ~~~( r? 1. "IDLfO i .;; i '1 r- 'Y y~ c ~ ~~ ~~ i i~ ~ ~ ~~nr _. ~ r ~ ~ D. i { k1 t '. fzSOU" rv / ~ ~ .is ~ r lil ~ 9,~F~r' v ~t ~I v t I I ~ - v ~ ~~ I Y ~ ~j ~I~r ~~ ~ v ~)OP~- r'~+^,<:~E^74~50-0tlE ~ ~ r _rc y z.. ~sc~ r 1~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ I,~ ~~II 0~i ~~... I J ~ ! ,~~4 ~ L 4~4f10' P ~ ~ c ~ x' ` I~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ i I 'i`' i ~ ,. ~I so3>~amfl, { I I : 1 4 _ Y ` ' 4 / r' (ICI^t ~5.. +i v : ~ ~ ~y ~~~ ~ 1 ' ' ~ ~ I (v \ ` ~` -era p* ~ Cie' ~ f 1 1. ~ ! ^ ~- 1 1~ .~ err; ~.' it r~ K ~ >` f I r` I: }l {l E)t, k _ t; i ~ ~~' .e ~ ~ j ~ v ~. ~ l- Q k'Pau r ~_. ~~ I ~ - ~~ ~;. ~o~ w.w =.ac--- •` r ~ ~ r' r :rr~ v~ ~ .,i i r i I'z~; j~~~~ ~ \,'IY Un 't j°~v i I~~ k ~~i ~ i !~ ., t ~Y~_ ~ `ic.~E tr[z ~'~- ~ ~' I ~ ~ I i ~ ' i °1}. i ~ ` J i h ~ ~~~ I 1 ''~ I . ~. ~ -~ ,~ a _~ •. ~ ~-a-.1 ~, II I .~ ~_ J. 'z ...... . --------------------- ~ .. - r'` r mow, -~"n - _ -- -- ~~ i •' `, , j ~-1 ri. :.a,'~: r-~r-;'- ;y~-~--~Y- ~1_'~~--•Yj'-f - ~~~-z,-, `~ c ~~r,~s. y_- ~ c . L $ ~' .; .. - r ,_ ~ ..; i _... ,....- _.--~. ~ -,..y. ~-~~.1._.~~_ *,. _ `r--~-~-_" "r' _-_ _ _~- ~ OrarNq Number. v ~. - .._ :,,i 4M 4 11~ 1 S' ,v~ t 1 ~ft~i 11'.1 ~ ~ ~ '. I ';~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ +' ' fi' ~ d ~ ~~ ~~ Ii r ~ C ~8a I ` 11,- k1 ~ ~1• '' ~ ~~ ` ~ i hl ' ' 111 1 w y` \, ~, . ~ -r-- y ?~' LOT 1 ~ LOT 2 ~- - onOV~ 0 1 ~ 1~ 1 1 ~, ~ J `i ti 1 n r 1 1 1. 14 ~1 ~~~ ~ ~t. .1,=: 1 y J V o ~ ro ~ v u 1 a 3~ 1 1 Y ~ ~`, § I~, h ~-. ~ I 1 LOT 9 11 11 _ e ~ 1 11 s~ LOT 4 r yy,1v ; IY:. l ~ w.. ~ 1 ` '~ t4 ~ BABBB-IT LE1~ *`~_ 1111 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~ iT ~ 1 (' ~ 1111111 (~~ ` ~=. _', t~ ?d': ~ ~4 ~ :7- _ ~ ,, 1 1 i~( ~ ~ a „~ ;. ~1 .RAJ, x, ~ P rixt r al ~ +_ A SECTION A I f. 1~ 2 1 ~ w .~ ~~. ,~~`~•~. i + ~:~:, n, ~ ~ ~ lillt~ j~~ ~<\ ~. ~ `' ~. '~ GRAPffiC SCILE 1 1111j1111 f :n ! ~ ~I ~ -', ~ f ,.. '~-Y' ~,i ',1- ~ P I. 1 ~ 111 P. 111 1~1. ~ ~`' ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ I L1 •1 ~ 1111e 1 7 } '• ~~ ~ 31t, ~~ '"-' ~ - ~ vn x o>rcuc~o x~ ~ eer 1 a u 4 .'~: ~V' S'`I ~ ~ ~_ v ~ ~' .>,F. M n~_c~oea ei ~ ~ r ~_ ~ t ea6 . ro )h ~~ 1 N 1 I ~ 1, ~ ~~ir 1 Y;. ~.-. I N 7D:1 ~1 1 .~ 1 11 i 1 ~~- 1 ' _ 1 NIVhN'i /~ 1 ~ 1' f Y ~ ~i~~' N' ! _~-' ~-:k~ r3T, ~~b6 ~ 1 r ~11 ~11;~ ~ ~,'V I. ~.~~I I '- ~-`^_~ °,,__'~- re_;~-~ tu.y.Irr ~ _ Q 1 11 euez' , ~ ~'in1P°dl ~I' 4 ~ ~ ~sT ~ ~' '~ ~I I ~ ~ ~ , ~sss.. ~ ~ ~ ~- -`-~~F ~~ II _ _ ~'S ~ F, r ~ 1 ~ Z 0 gggggg 1 nr r II 0! ,1 >1 _:' ICI ' t ~1 4i 1 1 ,I e ~ s ~ '~ r ~~ T ~ ~ _ J~MA~ - _"' ! ~ ~ ~~ - J ~ z _ 1 ',j I _ t i. - m c .. .., all. ~ rM'~: 1 1 r 1~'' ,Y ~ er ~~ ~ I I I ~ + ! I-7~~1 i 1 I Iw 1 ' ~'~-~ ~ _ _- ..,lyC~`I T. 't' Z U ~. 1- ~,~ ~ y ~_. I 1 1 1 , ,, l 1 ul 11p e1~ ~1~ .,C -`7 ~ r r~- • I 1 1 i 1'~1~ 1 in it ~!9b9Y155 ~i I I l' ~ _ 1 e~ Q ,.< ~ _ 1 -- 1 r- ~ 1111 111,.11;1., k~ ! ! ~, t_ i : ~ ~ 4 _ ` ~~i !,i _ n - 7.1~ P ~ ~ ~~t'~ }-~~~ ~ ~ ~zn_~~ ~~ ' y G4. 5, ~. 1 11d N11 ,. ~ .~4`-b :/.~ : ~;~~' ~•,., LLL i~l ! ' I _- ,'~ ~ ~-, 11 ,. !, .r ~I11111n~1I~.1 ~~ 1' 0 ~~,,,i~C . '11 ~~7~ ~~. ~~ ~ 1~ ~ 1. „.~ .. ~ Q ~ ~__..---- - ~~ ~.. 4as€ ar,r- , 1 1 ' 1 r 1 1 ~ ~ 1 C•. A , ~'a ~ ~, , 1°" ~ [ u . r s 1 11 1~ , ~ 1~ ~1 _ .. ~~ , ~~4 ~ `-~< ,,.> ti ~~ 1 t ,,, ::e 111 1~~.~11. 1 . ~ ~^-f~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 4 d . ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~,' r~ r~ ~ y ~3'! _ d'I 1111. dv ~ ~, t~~~. ~ L" ? ~ I ' .. C. ~':,~. ~ o ~~-..-E+ :'e~ • ~. ~ .. ,~ 1 d 11 1' 4 .. , ~ "~ ~ ~ h 11 :, I1111i Lpx '~ S.. li, '~,` ~ 1 ~I 7 b ;, r < 1 ., '~ ~' 'x' 1ti \ 1 I I li 1 1 41 ~~- _„A~ / ~ { 1 ~l ~~~~ : ', .~1 \ ~ Z ~ + l~; R I~ r ~ ~ ~J' s . ~~ ~ Y ? ~ K 1 1 I~Y~` ~ 1 1 ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~~~ 11 1 _ ~ ~ ~ Q 1 1 ~ i11~14}:il 3 lu -1 ~ ~ ~.fi~.-~ ~~~. u~1~ ~ ~ ~ '-4 e~ ~ ~~. 0 ~' ; ~V I I ~ ~ pJ 1 1 I IItl ~ P'' "- .r(r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' r ~ ~ T ` ~ iii ~ a ~ o ~ _ ":mot' 1 ~.., ~ ~` ~ p ~I III ~ ~ ---~ 1 r ~ d'F n. ,,~ b p ee T i w ,nL erl [ ¢ w ~ ~ p p t l ~ 1 11 i1, ~ 11 II '~ ~ ~ .~ - ~'0.,.~ +* ~ ~ {il ~ ~, ~[u G~ rrre. ~ ~ J 1 y~' ,., ,; LL z ~~11 ~ 4 ~1 ~, ~`~m''sw, i I~ ~ ~. '! - F .~ ~ i ~i' , { ~i~I n~ '..t. T' I p Q i ~ P~ ~~~ ~ - _ ~ 1 ~ bl qq gg~ .~ ' ~ ~ ~ 11 :. , ~'~~ r ~~,~ '~ ~' r, . I ,a.aa~ PARCEL 2 , ;j~ ~ ' V ~., ~,~ ~~1 Z `" 1 Km W 1 7 "'~~ ~~ 1 '~ t , ' ~ 1 ~ ~' ~ 19 ~'„L ~` ~ I ~ V ~ ~ AR A ,~~ ,iti.--1 1,1, ~ ~~~~ ~' ~t:F ,~, ~ { ~,: - 1.61 AC L-~ AREA ~,;> ~ ~~.:.:~~~~` ~` F; `~I % -~~'~ W J ~Z ,, 1- LL _. _ ~w,, 1 rA~ ,' ~ __._. 5.50 Air ~-~ , :,. ~, we 1 1 n1 _ p ~-~ X11 1 Y~~o 1 ~' ~•il ~ ~ e* ,. '~ ~ i, I, ~ U 1~ ~ i 1 ~ 111 ' ~ I ' ~~S A 1 - 94~M--8- .... ' rte. ~ I It ~ i~~~ 11 ~1 ~ V i. ~ } 1 Ilia 11'- -~ i f -"J~ ~a,~ ~, - 1627U - ~ :. {~~~i~ t~ ?' i s -V~- ~. ~I~-~~ ~ ~ ,1 1 1 1 li ~ i e ~~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i" n ~ II I. .f .,Ih i, •rrt:e F 4' ~ ".'-~ S} ~ ~ j , 11 II ~ :L- 1 1 j1 I i 1 ~ :~`~' 6~ 10.00' '~~,:' ~ _ _ rr ~.._ -. i ~ 1I ~~ ,..,~~ ~ ~ -1 ~ t 1 /I ~ V 4 it' 1 ~I l,tl 1 11 1' i~ i... T ~ ",~/"`~ A ~ ~ ~ m Br I l i FnII 5 1 ` 1 ;.-i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ y/ Y ~ 1 ~k ` IIF Z `t~ ~ l'1 1 III 1 11, N' ~~ I1 ~ ~.OOO ~F 1 's/'CI~M ~~ ~ ~ IE F. ll- lu 1 I 111 i 1 FFF 1 ~'~ AA'' I 4 G, A 1. I I I~ I 1 ~ 1~ P _, ~h~ ~ i u 4 ` ~~ ~` ' ~ ~. :. ru /i' ;~ ~m , I`~~I~, t'1 '~I I ~I II~~ -~ p Z k, ~ e - Fly.. 11Y ~'~ IL ! `1 ~1."/"1C __ -~ ,~:f J. 11 y~ ! ~k- 1~ ~VI I II i I~ ~ O I~, 1 Y 1 y'Mt i i ~ ~ ~~ 1 I I~ ~ Z ~~ I ~~ 1 1 1 ; ~ ~d- ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ 1, , ,, ~ p I F ' 1` 1 ~1 ~I ~~ 11 ~~ ~O ~! ~~ i @5 ~~ i '~ ~ ~~~~ ' 1: ~~.1 Hr ! 1 ~ Y,~ h I ~ I .xt~ll l~yuc W Y ( ~~ ` I '' d _ 11 IIIL[y~{}[~'E~ ~ r ~ ' .xu i I '~ ~ ~~Y ~ 1 ~~~ ~ e ~. 11 t1 s I ~ : I d ..~8.4 d ~ I ~ u!i r u. [. 7 1 1 ~.1~ 1 - y ~ ~ ~~-~ ~~ 11 e9d, l.. ~ ~ °Pn ~~ F 1 ~ ~' i ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ F 4 ~ i-tb,, , ~1 ! 1 ~. ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ ' ~ ~ I 1' 1 i ~'~ i i fi J j _ ~~ I r-•-~-~ Ill' ~,b ~- 1 , ~ , . , ~~ `__,~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~I ~.~ 1 ~,~; I ~;~ .~ ,. , ~'' Imo. ~ +' ~ , ~ ~;~ ~ ~' 1111 ~,~~ y`~ ~ , ~ *•~~ 2,~s 'dr ~~a ~ ~r ,,~ .. ~~'°'-~,~L.~- 1 i I ~I i 1 ~<. r' ~~~ ~ "~~~ ~ ~.~ 1 ~ .:I ,~~ [Hr .[ : ~ ~." I ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~. ,::a=.` ~ <. - - .~ ~ -Z;-.> f i 1 r~ !~ % ! r~~ i 1 i c. ~.i Id ' ~ ~ ~i tr i ~tc~.~ er 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~, ~ i _ i ~ dd ~+~ ~ ., .., ~ ~ ~'.r i ~ _~ ~' ~ i T1 ~ h,. rv l~ ~~~ ~ i .z. ., -_ V``. ._. -.. ~__ a ,:it;. _,~ ~_ _ - - _~-•;._• _ - ~~~1--'~ _~r 1495 - ~S-~ 1 ., r .. ,- ~~~ ~. ,~ , r-, : _ ~ IURN POCIfET (SEE ARCH Drawln9 Number: S EV NS CREEK BLVD Ey9A9E 9NEET) _ ~ _ _-- _ C_1 1 ~ 2 ®BKF ENGINEERS i~~ ~~ ~ '~ ` ~' 1 xi "~ ~ .~ 1 F l ~~ \, ` ~,`~ a .. ~a ~',',~ v ~ ` 8S ~ =. ,,, l ~ I 1 l ~ ~ 'i; s ~~a ly l ~'l lFi~~l . ; ~! ~ ~, l ~ LOT1 0~ LOT2 ~~ I I l I l ll ILiF \ r' i } \ ~ i' J ~m rr 1, ', _ _ s~ ° ~ °_„~g~ 1, l . ~ ~ 111 ~,~ `' ~ ,'~ T .-r ~, F LOT 9 LOT 4 lseu l h .1 1 ,y -'' ~ 1 r i l l fi ~' l1l r~ i\\ T j 1~,, xa IrIl,,1~iII V 1- ?7 ~~. ~ ~ ~( ~ 1~.yy BAS6@IT 'tl l" 1,1~ 1 I N ~ ! ~ ~~ i~' ~ F~ ~ . ,~ f "" A SEC710N A l'l ill l ~ .~u ~ '1 1 1 1., r ~~ r ` ,~ I1 ,. ~ 5 ~ lllii ~ VsF :, ~ ~ .~ ~ .~lt,~x. re"<~FFr s ~,, J i ll ~ l nik`l~, ~ ~ ~r ~~ i 11115 1 ~qy \ t >.i Ftlf.~~ ~ l yi5t \ `~s\ ~„ ~ • ~ i -r~ _',w ' _ l' GRAPHIC SCALE ,. ~, ~ , ~_~ ,R l _SX. _, { .. ~1~ 'h' \~ t~ t- '+,;, ~ / •t f c . l~ s' 1 ,pI l e0.an nssaiaFn r (a lst i ~~t ~ l 1,1 ~. ~'y, '~ ~ ~`y - 3111 1 ~" - n _ - _ 1 _ "%" :F...Nf fJF f 2FC !1 ~, ~ l ho- .10 IL ' 1 L" ~ l ~~` W~y~ it rr l ll ~ _ ~•~ l-. "1 l- ~ IDv i~..h- l l -- 5 i. li 14 r 4~,~. I I _--~-I-..---~- r~ l wl~x ~ ~~ \ r (~~"` ~i' r' Y _ ~ ._~( ~ .. ~-'. .~~`...._2ar-~ r_ _v- .ire r aF ~~f~ _,i } ~l t.SG I I l! ~ ~~"! i I `` i r ~~ e k ~ r ,, - li ~ ( J 1 ~ ~l",o o,rll`~ 4 . ~:o ~ ; ~ I I ~l ~_;- I I - _- -'---,.~ .= _ - ~ ~ ~a.r 1 Z ~ l ~~l 111„l'~~ ~ a ~, , 1 ; . ~ ~l ~ ~: - ~ ..r I I I 'l '. rr :. ~ MA~F~Y '1~4V~ ,..x ~;" l ~ ; ~, -_ ~ ~ ,' 1~_ Q ~~I it I lid ~I11 ~~ly ~ l ~ ~ ..',^, i 1 '~ 1IrPIir`l al ~. 1 1 _ 1 ~ ll-~! vlllPl lp Yl ~ J /ice 1 l •{• yll~b~l 1~lll - r ~ ) s ~'IPd Ilyl ~ ~ , ,i s ,1 'll v~ Y -~~~~ 1111 .. `l \ ~`11l dlW lµ 1 ~ ~f., 11 r l~' l Itl~ 1 1 ~ ~~~ ~ t 1, 1'lill5l1~4 r>,lv, ~,. 1 ~ ''l Il p uy -' .n ~' l !- l Il !~ 1 ~ ~ '' "~ - 1: l ~ =` yl ll~r l1l1G ~ r 5 C~~l 1.l . ilk C ' 41'1 {. { ~lllll ~, l l,lll,,l~ Ili 1 ylll llc ' 'z.r ,~ 1 v ~~ - ~ ~ r ~ ,, ,, i 'v' , ~m J i ~ ~ 6 l 1 ~ ~~ ~ 1 A ,. 1 ; ~~~~~ fi 1 ~. J l "Z }e l `r 7 I ~ t _. 1. ~ 1111 /ehw~ m.le.n Y~ ~ , 1 1`~i ks 1 _I t. Jj~~ ~~. l 1 u I ~ 1 1~ j r ~ ~~1~ ~. l ~- l w,: l I 1~ ~~, ~, , Y 1 l l~' `'1111 ~IJ ~ } ti ~I l l t. l ~yi t~,'~ l ~ i 1 ~, ~lll y ) III I(, ei Fllll l ~`t , ~l 1 l 1 5 ~- 1 li 1, f, 1i l ~~ r re .~"~ 1'c r ~~ '~ °~vn r r- ~ 5l pis ...i> ~~ ?-~ r J-'I r ~1 ;, l l ,,;h ~1 'Ip IL 1~ b9Y~1'S5 i 1 ~ r ~ ,"*4. .~ ) $. l ~l*~\ ,I ", u'+'~ ~ f e, c¢s . { ~~ 1, lr ~~ x ~ ~1 1 + '~ l - ~ i ~~~~ l \ ,~ `, ~ lr _.1 ) ~ ~ _ ~ \ ' S Y~ °~ j , _e (. ~„ _ _;_ ;_ y~-- ~ .~ ~~ Y z o 5 ,~ I a ~,_ r l a e r. ~ t Q i '~ ,. ~~ 1 l r "~ ' 1 ~ 1 ~~ ~ 4" it +• 1 ~~ ~ hI } ~ 1 ~ ,c '~ 1 _.. _, r 1 ~_ tie z ~~ U 4 -) .._ ! is i rl r ivr rr' c- [c O 6 r l r,I•' ~ ~ LLQ - .. ._ .. F ~,I A __.. -... .. .._ 'i ~1. l MON 1~ a~i=~ ~ ,~ r ~~ ~ ~,rrr , ~.s,..[. o o z T r I 4 ~ ~ ~ Z ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Iv ~ r ~ Iv i. ~. ~~ V Jr <d wa. ,al ~ xIA _ ' I ,i r r ~' ~:! PARCEL 2 r ~ ,-~~' `~' ~ I! ~ 1i ~ V Wo I OC ~> I - AREA 1r', ~ ~ ~`r '. _'^ WJWZ 1 . II •,~ u , =O C7, ~ ~ ~- ~ - --- 5.50 AC • ," ~: , ~ ,'I l; `, ~I, ~~ x,11'" > > Q ' ~ . _... t ~ Z __ e ~ " I. ~ 16270 -'-' ...--_-_ I" a ke~" z ~ s^n~ r,rr..fff '=r ~ ~",. ¢es, .; ~ ~ ` ~ ( 1 it 1'L : T ' 1 ..._' ~ ,~ »~~_ ...... _~ 5,a ~. ' I :~ A >• ~~, ti ~.-~ror•;e n 1 ,~ 5 li I ~1 ~ ~ i1 V I m.iridL! r ....- - I .._~ r 1 __ t ,. y 1l 1 i ri I - r w.[ ac 11 ~ 1 I{ llr~i € : .:.~ " 4000 ~ ~ _ ~ { 1 1-' ~~ ~,~ ~ ~ 1 ~I i l 4 1 i' l ~ i., ,~ " ~ ~ _.~ °~ : ~ 1 I ilk ~~~ ~ ~, r l ~+i 1., _ +r ~ ~ Ir I ll I'~ i O i~ ~_ '=~M l Z ...._ r~P N ~~ I I1~, $t ~ -+---~---~-: i r r ~ ' . ..-,..... _ .. li_ ~a~ t `~ ~ t~ ~ n ~~~ ~' 11 ~ ~~ ~.~0 it ,~,I~ ~ I~ ~ ~1 1 r! r r @ . 1 J I~r d ~ i ! r ` ~ rne.: " ~ /~+--r-~ _ -~.-~, ,• ~ ~ ~ ~`S . ' ( r~ ~;: +'ar , i '~ ~ ) oht~ rr[cs V ,` T -r`t-~-- ~° ,i ~Y f~- --s-r~~ / 1.•,r,.~ ~~_v_1`'S'- i e.s I i r I ~ ` r. ~r ~ ~ r r~~ C.C 299. ~. 0 L _ ..~~.~ ~'r1 ~ ~ l.I I 3 Y i ~ 1 IG~' F[["> ~ a r' ~' ~-~-: r r r i 1.1 I t•'~ "' r i ' l 1a.-,;,~ - rl, s'yl~~j lv ~~,~of e:eY si r 1{i M~ I ~I rr ~ rc `.'- ~'. T r,.. ~ r i { ~ r~11 ! ~~ 1,. ~I ~ i i { l ~ I i'+~` ", ~~ r "" ~P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ k [. '~ ~ r v r ~ t•-1_~r ~ ~ l l I { r l S 4 ~-~-.,-~ r l ~ ~ ~vr .. ~~'~ i w o[xs<fa;FS .o~ l ~ ~ ,~ - ~a', _ s 4 e ,. - "• _ .''t---~ g ~ .1' ( -`\ _ ,, ,_ 'ice r-~ . ". ~. ,. ~` ~ ~~ -_ ~~' ...- - r ~. t ~~ ..,. i -- .,. STEV NS CREEK BLVD - '°°~ "x'".i : % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l ;TURN POCKET (SEE ARCH Omrin9 Nurrbr ... BASE SHFET) .__-_ __ _. _-._-_..- .. _ ............... ........___ .._ ............... l.._..___. C-' 2 OF 2 m alrc ~nlrln w: t o{ ~~ 1,1, ~ ~ ~- ~- a ~ ~ ~ I I~, , ~ I'I I ~ ~ a7~~ ~ 111 I' 1 f, ~~~I~ `• 1 I { I, I 11,141 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 5 // ~ ` L q' ~1 `' 4 ! 1~ , i i I~ p ~l ~~ s •~ 1 I ,,I , . I ~ 1 .y1 ~~ A'11~ ~,~ 9n .~ ~, --t ~, , .~ i `.'~ h,~l ..r ~~ e:. ~I +~ ~ r., iu d ~ .,~ -1,r .~r I ~ 14 v i ~ ao 1 ~ ~ r p .... p`p¢I~'. ~ 1 ~ ~ "W o'~~tgn'n' ,: , ti ~ ~ I, ~ 1 5 ' . ~ I ,. 1 ~ 1 ii 11 6 ~ ~ •~. ,p , j; T ~ I. ~~ ~ ~ zss ~'~~ de , ~ ~1 J ~ ', "I^ ~ 4 try ~ ,~ k'V ~.~~I ~ 7 1 A;I , ~ I ~ {. 1 z+ ~I~1) e, ~~ I 4 ~~1 _ I i I ~~~ ice. ~ ~ ,~ . ~ i ~ 7 ' I a c I, ~ ~. _ n ~~ ~( ~~'. ~., r `~ ~~ to ~ _ .F 1 ~. ~ 'M111 111 ~ 1...1~i" _ x ~i ,1 ~, { I ,w "f 1 ~~i, ~ ~I 1 i ~~ ; it 11 Q.1 ~ ~~;-m ^S.~- i< ,'., ` ,.. 1~, ~ d I ~ = ~ ti to 1 ,~` ~ s~ ~ ,~~V ~ 111 ~}~' ~ ~ 111 1 ~ , ~~ a v fi I ~ 1 ~~ 5 91~„ ~„~ ~~,- ~,,~ ~, ', \ t f1 ~~ u~ I ~ . ~1 : _„*~ ~ n . - v" I li = _ * _ -.i~ 1„_ all ~ ~ ATE ~ 9 I , `-r_ ~ A11.,, 1 I ~ ~ tt ~ ~ 6g 1~ ~ e ~ ~? f ~, r , ` it i ~~ a ~ 'y ~I !~ ~ ~ I~10Ji0 ,] i l i~ ~ ~ i, r ~ g h ~ t I ~ y` ~ ~yl ~~ ~,91'L,~ I 1 ~I's 1 , 1 Ire ' _ I, 1 ~If l ~ ~ ~-r~,1~,e ~ I, ~ , 1 ~. '°~' ' ,~ 4 ~ ~. ll I i a ~. ,, ' , I ;n, ~ --- 11{' .I , !~I II I'1 a 1<„ I~,>Trk p ` i t , ~ +~~~ t , i I~ i ~ ~~, ~ _ =; l M1 ~i l E v ` x ~', - _ 's ~..., 'r~ _,~-~ ,nom= s BMP NOTES: ~ ; ~>` 1, ALL SITE RUNOFF WILL BE TREATED BY ~3 , ~• .,• ~ 3.• _ ~# . r MECHANICAL UNIT CDS UNIT (MP-51 ). ~ .-:. ~_~~ _=_-- 2. TREATMENT SWALES (TC-30) 1MLL TREAT A,,., _ PORTION OF THE SITE RUNOFF. ~ r,. ~~~LLF ~.-03- _el~` ~ _ i GRADING NDTES: Ql NEW AC SURFACING AND PARKING STll1 STRIPING O NEW PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS Q3 EK BUIl7MNC B~NC DEMDLISHED AND flENODEI.ED ® NEW AC SECTIDN AND PARKING ~',, ~: ~~si u- O IfCETATED BIDSWALE, 4' IWDE NININUM ©NEW 5' WIDE SIDEWALK 's ~. 1 Y g n ~ x n .~`. m w C u0q ogomn Te °~~~5 WN Y Y ~I N ~~ GRAPffiC SCALE 1 ix roe ~~' /• 4 :[.J 9 ~ ~ T1A11~ ~k:LJY ' . ~ l f 0' Hn [L [ UfiGJ 6Y ~ ~ p ~ . I ~YL.. Q ~ y , ~ _ _~ ~ -`_~.- f', ._. JL- ~r JC C FEES ~ r- ~ Er L K • _ ~ _.... ' I --l ~ r l i I ~ l ~ 1 ~ t 1 ' ~ I 1 ~~ ~ .~ ~Y.u. f r N t~~ ~I ~~ il.~ rv~ .ESS v .o \ o r~l ~ 1 O ~ U 0 -- J a ~ ~ ~ V ~ma ` ~ I~ CJ'~d "viCl I ~ II I ~ I xJ ~OwQ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ wa, ~ a ~ , ~ _ i~: ~{.. - r ~ ~a.~ .~~' t : is V V _ ~, _ . . I 4) ~ I . - ~ l ~ PHYSE 1 -~ -OF . i . `~ `` 4 ^ .. fi Po i :.y~..U .ED e iLe .'~~ IF E F is ~ ~ t - I 1~ X11 *~ ~; ~ I ~ 1 ~I 1 ~ ` ~ ~4B.I6 TRU7AENT , II S ~~ ~() ~ .k .~ p e ' I 11 ~ ID ~ n a ', ks '` 1 ~ r i . i. ~ C ` t ,T, { ~ 7 ~ F '1 ~ O I ~~ ~ '~I ~ I ' ~ r I ~~ I 1 i I ~ W 1 ~ + l 'T' I I ~ I~ ~ ~ o ~ , ' ~ o I,,~"~ ~ 'y, ~,I I I I c G~ ~ ~ds [t~n U ~' ' ~ a ~'4 ,~,. ~ ~ ~ rl l l ~ ~'%~ ~EQ a t.mr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ 1 i a ~xE; ~ ~ I l ~~ ~ ~ ~' "~ ~ ~~.~i~r~~~b„ ~ ~ , . ~~ ' I r~ ~ ~~I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I a I ~ , I J, . :. n~ e ~ ~ ,. / ~ ~ ~ I I I I I L ~ ~ .~ - u ~ ~~~ , a I I ~ .581 l~ ~ ~ i O ,~ p Y F av~ 1 ~n • ~ ~ 1 • w ~ -~ tom,. \ l ' `% ~ ~' ~, ~ Ee 'p ~ ~ ~ ;~ I ,, _ ,, l ~., ~~ ~~r av I,I i ~.4 ~~I ~~, ,,J ,,; ~ „~~, ~~~~ ' r r ~ ~ ~ , ,=~f I ~ o f ' ~~T f ~ ~. ~ -~ I I ~ ~ r~ ~ n ~ .... - - ,~ J I , -_ ~ . E - ~ ..Wp. -- - r :... T... . „ _ . y- _ _ -Y-'er r . ° - - 7 _ 6 ws uTO - - ,. -- -- ... ,, ~ , ~' ~ ~-CDNFDRNr.-='t'-__-~ ~'~' t -~-~ .+~.~ ~ - ~~~° STEV~NS~REEK ~VD 5 _ - TD RFIIAIM ; ~ ; ; `~ 8 3 - - _ _ _ _ _ , ,, ~M. . ~ ; ~ ~ • _- ~ , "`a" c.~_ VJ-i'o -_ -_JLL_i_l, fla , ~ ~ ~~ ' ~~ '/ i C .i~•' 7! '~" "c I _a m• I ~ ~ d i ~ . 1 / ~ .. ~ ~ •>- - - f aus I ~%" Dra Num6r: C-1 1 ~ 1 ®BKF ENGINEERS R ~ ~~ ~~~~!I~~1~ ~~ \,~ i 111(~I}`1~ ~ i1; ~ ~~ `~~~,d~``~`I~~J` ~~eev l a~ ~,`~1`1,1 1 ~I I t 11~1`111i1' I I 11 PP~~ , ~~~~~II ~, ~~~~ ~,111~ ' ~ ~~ ~~ ~'~~~~~,1 ~~~~I \ 11 I I11 \\}1 I ~.. j', ~ ~9~, SI ~ ~9~ , '\t\1; ~ 1 z9 \az TAE ~f ~ ~ I .3M.P 1 ` \ ~ I 'T. ni-~_mJ asET -~! -oq - 2V9 29U• ~_~-- mac, ~' DENSE TREES .>m, , , - cif P99P V e~,J1 o P961 ~~,~I`~,.~', ,x;1`,1, .~~- `ti , .. /~~ ~ p 1 \,~1\ 1 -~ ~ ~ ~ I `\~ p~l\ yr r i j ~~ ~~,i ~~ f"v ~ ~ ~ \, ( ~ ,; ,-', ~ . II u j I~',~~, N ~' ~ TSTAL STALLS ;~~'~,`d ,1~ " J 1:' BY CLASS ~, I~! I- ~'~,, ,,~~~c9" C=COMPACT (B.5 DR LESS> 63 STALLS '~ `,,, ~~„i_ ~ ~`` ~ s~~!~~, U=UNISTALL (9.0' TD 8.5') 309 STALLS ~'; ••~ a ~- _ ~ ~ S=STANDARD (9.0' ER MERE) 127 STALLS '~~ ~ ~ .~~ ~~~' 1~ ~ , ~,,' I , I ~ µ ~6 ~ I 31 Iti~l`I ~1 ` y,9,i. ~~;~~ ,r~ ~ , ~11 ~r~~,_ ? ~~ ., e ~ ~ nesaT z„, ~ 'u'~ ~~ I~~ 4 ~ ~' ~1 ~ ~ v ~V 1 v ' ~ ~ ~ 1 . \ ~'` 't ~ ~,9v ~ ~ `~1 ~ ~ , 1~` ~~~ ~ '~ - l ~ , ~' ~, 9 ~~ ~`~ ' \, '~` \~ \\ ~1C~ 3m3 P9f~ ' 1 i1 1 \ sx ~ ~, 1 ~' 'h'~T _ i 1 i ~ I l~y V ` .C`~ ~ a ~, ~~ DENSE TfEEi ~ '` I ~, a~ s. - - _m., ~o .A.~_ ~ ~ / n ~ n a m rc ~ma `~ Wli oggm6 ~ i~ ~~~8$ ~~ ~~ GRAPffiC SCALE /• (ana) ~~, zfs° `\ 1 Yah ~ b M1 \ \ 1 ,i ~ C~k90 [G~SDEA© ~, mz 1Y ~z\` ~ GkWh- L-SCIT[D P+ a MNSC TREE I~~``v _ \- ~ V O .~ J n ^ ~~~ BENSE TREES ~ J / 393! ,Y9lD 39U `^ 0~ \ ~~~ '~ \~ ~` I .\ ~./ .. I ,A~, ~~ : ':: ~ ' ; ~ ~ 1 1 ~~~ '~ ~ ~ ~--~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3,~ ~ ~ y Ma Im3 ~ ~ .~esa \, -R-LIt1 D~EURED BT ! ~, ~/ ~ J ~ ~ .w19 ~~ ~~ `~~~~~~~~~ OENS~ ilns ~ ~ N ~ ~ Q . ~ ~ ~ U ~ \ '` ~~ - ,` ~ \ , ~ . ~~~ ~.~ .~° ~ . I a ~1~ ~ zu. y ~ \ \ ~' ~1\ TENSE TREES . ; n39 ~ % ~ \~ \\1 `,~~ 1 ~ ,~ ,~ ~~ '. S ~ `;` li , \ 11 ` 11.1111 I' ,,~, mrri~arr~~ar1~11 ~ 11 ~I I O ' ^~ ~~ ~ I "`" \ ~I I `, ~ W / _ ~ / ~:, 1 J~yN9 f(Y(L' '~ ~ ~'I~IrRO ~I~ 9~ n er \ II 11 TO ~I I I Q E~EES ~ J ~ 11 ;, - ~ ~~~~, ,~~~~ I~ ~' ~ ~-L~,,A, v A ~ b' 1 I y ^~ ~ I .n9: -^ ~ ~ ~ I I _~ 1 i ~:FS I !~'"L-~ I, GP.WI1- -BSCURE- BY _ I n ~~~ L~ ~S~% Sll \~jl ~ ~ ulrse ~.wzES p~''2~~ (~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I 9 _ _ __ l'' a~' i I ' i ~~~ -~~ j__ y'~,z~z, PR3 . P9. _ _ ~- I ' °~~ r ~ ;~-~-7 _-~~ ~ ~'~,-~ _ 295- ~ '~~ '+ 1 .\~= 291 ~' P9y) ~ i ~ 3 9yy~ g@ __ _`_ __~ ~ ~-~' -P9 ~_~~3~~I ~~ OroNNq NumDx. .~ ~ ~ j ~ e P9 ~,' % - EXB-1 a sti Zr O ~ j N ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ $~ ggQ Q O~ ~~ ~ ~~ .~ .~~ ~ ~~ ~ D ~ ~ !- E z m D r v `J V 1 m G7 m z v m •°• m~z ~ °~c~ ~~~ rn v~n~~sMS M~ y: y A~ CD ~ w ;~ ~~ ~~ g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g r O ~ ~ 3 m g a m m ~ N m ~ O E p~ 0 m ~ A ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~o ~~~ ~~ ~~ ts g ~ O O J O IF X C B t6 S S ~ & ~ X Y% B ~ g O ~ j O ~ + ~' .~. J a J O J O V !~ W .p+ ~ a $ S ° X Y. X W u V ~ J S J ~ S ~ W u '- S ~ L" ~ K V Y V u 1=' ~ J b • Z '~' • a a o ~. • e a v u u o a G v d w a a p O - ~ • - ~ - a o o a a • a ° 3 - F a T. u 6 - .7 - 6 q + ~ s y + a F u "' ~ U 6 U '! a u F 7 a i. - u ~ 6 "~ a v a ~= a b a ~ ~ o ~ a a `~ J u ,F, a u u ~ u ~ ~ i " 4 * a ' o O F ~ m T ~ ^T3 m Q ~ L ~ T ~ L S ~ ~ T ~ T L S S ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ OrS( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 O O m o 7 O 7 O ] O , P 01 3 O ] O o 1 P 7 O O 7 O p A 7 P O A 7 S 7 O 7 O O ~ 7 S p 111 7 O ~ 7 O g L ~ 11i~~ g g i g Y ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ L g t g t $ i g i g Y ry ~ f' ~ ~ $ Y ~ Y ~ s ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ] ' O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~I ~~~IIIIII D ~ Y M % X k % % % k % % X k k % % k k % % X k % % k k % k % % % k % % % X k % X % k k % % % k % % x X % % k k % x x % % k i m ~z O ~ ~ o ~ 0 ~ ga a~ss~~ ~ s ~ 6 ~ ^ ~ 7 pp pp pp FF pp pp ee @@ F F F~ F F F~ F~ F @@ pp pp pp Q@ f F~ F~ f~ F QQ QQ pp@@@@ p@ QQ pp F F f F f FF F f pp ~~ ~~~ ~ F ~ o • ~ i]iif>> s i i ~~ ~~ s ~ ~ '~ i Zqg ~~ ~~~ g i F~ 4 ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ° - ~ ~ R ~ e ~ a f ' _ v ip ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ , x( 77~~ [- i i a ~ ~ ~ Y ) ~ ~ { ~ $ y1~ ~ s [ [ 1 ~ f ~ ~ k I~ P ~ y P P ~" 7 7 • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 Q{ ~ i ~ ~ e~ I? y { , o ~ f ~ ~ ~ > ' ~ y j{ ~ ~ ~ ^~ A Z b ~ y ~ ~ M e ~ 6 8 b a°~o ~ ~ ~s ~ j~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Y ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ s z> ~_ ~~ s ~ Z ~ g_ ~ ~~ ~D ~~ D 5~ ~~ m ~~ ~ D~ ~~ ~~ N A ~~ ~~ ' rn~ g$ ~~ , o ~ ~N N ~, ~ A 6 ~> 0 x~ ~~ ROlll lORTf[I~ SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY 489 S. EL CAMINO REAL SAN MATED, CA 94401 THE OAKS MIXED -USE PROJECT HYWAY 85 & STEVENS CREEK BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA ~Rt~R mOLR~ ~~ X ~• ~~/^, ~~ o~ ~~ ~~ y~ r ,Y (p w n ~~ 4 J "~ ~ ~~.~, P ~ ~~~ ~~4 1~~ s '~-~: N0. 55 '~~ \ ~tiCN, `, . ~ '~ ~.~ No.sa, i i° '~ ' \ n ~~TAE ~~ T"~ P' p~ To ~~ (E) SOUND WALL 2 TbpRF~llhlll ' Y, Z ~ ~ 7AEE TO ' REl1AIN) ~ O EUG TO FBAAMI ,. 2 ~ '~ ~ ~~ !. ro nExw - NEW -~ SOUND WALL 1 NO E)0871 r~ ~VACY HEDGE ~.~. . ~\ ~` `._ ,' % \ \ \\ LOCATION / ~ OF \ BACIffLOW \ PREVENTION \ DEVICE ~ ~; ' ^^~~ ~~ ~i ~, y ~~ ~~ ~ ` 0 ; ~ F~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~', G~ ~ , ' - \ , ~ ~~ /~'\ II wooouulcxoNtr. \ _~ ,j1 i L~ ~ ~......1 ,-- TO RENW ~~ Q C ~ ,\ ~W O',:~ rAC ~, ~: ' ~ . y. 1.. N0. 8 ' e' TIRE ~~ ~. ~~:~. 7AC pe NG. v ~~ i s G~i _ . ~ .: • 122 UNl`fS ~~ ~ 1 'NO ~' `'•, 8 ~ -r ~ TO RENAN ~~ ~ ~ ,_ . , .,~~ , . ` ~~ ~T ~z ~ i 4 ST(~Rl \ -- ~ ~ "~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~, ... ~ - d (, e• ma ~ TAG. it ~ ~ ~ ` ~' FOOTPRIf~~° ~ EW MONUM • ~. ,' ~ ' ~ _ ~. : 0 Cl ENT _ ..... `~~~ 23,158 S.F. ~ o, ; 1' sIGN I '°~'"~ ~ ~~ ,,, ~ ' ~ "' TOTAL AREA: ' Qfi8 \ ~+C 61,822 J.f F e ~ ' ~P Id• l~ i 0' k~ ~ 'fi ~y c ~ , • ~~ ` , i , 7AC m r., . ~ . ~ Ts 1 D~'~ ~ xo ; ~ ~ ~ I . •~ ~ A• 4 -\ , ~ WOOD MLCN OILY. ~ TAC 71I ` n ~a, QIISIpEJR`i~iRE~~ l Nom.: i ~ , \ ~ ~ , p No. ~s; NEW a. 'r'' ~ ~ ~ :. ', , TRANSFORMER ~ , ~t•. NE{~ ` ~ 16~ ` " ,~ '' ` PAD LOCATION OR ~ X ~; ` TRANSFOf~MEf~ , ' ~'I -1. . r: C~` PAD 1' ,~ C.. ~ j ~ N . u , t MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L3 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (NORTH) GregG.ing &Associadcs 19575rA4meda 5u&10 Sr~h66tlfmdR%7M ~~ .Ie~ r~mr TN~'af p~ wa 1«A ~~ ! M CE~ ~ T FP 1 ~ J p U m E Q W ~ LlJ Y d ~ Y U ~ >z d X ~ U ' ~ ~ Y ~ z d H O Q Lu H ~ U ~ o. U ~ J g' ~ ~ ~ G o z a U a J U W s w ~ tl ~ v ~ ~ ~~ k REV. N0. REV. DATE 04.15.08 CONCEPTUAL ! LANDSCAPE 1 PLAN (NORTH) ~ N NORTH ~^ TRIE 1 JOB NO.; GregC. Ing ~rAsaooates ]53fThAAmEda aim .sN,7ae ruA,~ ~J2s MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L2 --v ~~~ Euc. roREM lEl ~~ oAK ~~ EI~1C. \ TD REMAN ~. To ~~ ~i \ ~.- TO REMNN TO REMAIN //~ .. . ~ TO REMAND ,~ _ / STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (SOUTH) is' oAk iAC wT r N NORTH THE ~- d} 7' ge 9rF q> G~kaQ' ~ J p U m i ~ y Y Q W ~ W ~ d ~ Y v z ~ ~ > X N U 6 ~ z cn O Q ~ a w ~ = V I - 2 ~ } ~ Q a U ~ ^ Q ~ ! Q ~ ~ E U a a o J V W Ee = W Q g ~ a E Z ~ Z d ~ a v ( R DATE: ~ k REV. N0. REV. DATE 04.17.DB 1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE ~ PLAN (SOUTH) L3 ~ JOB NO.: ,... ; .1V'JAP171EEgi \..iA6 ps, \NG ID1' %~ . NAPIE TAG Mi ; 0 0 ' .. 0 0:. o. ,d.. ..o 0 1 ,• ~ 1: / ~ ~ ,/ ~ /~ ~-_ ~" '- ~, \ i a ~ ~r ~~ ~n I ,~ '~ ~ %. HEDGE 1~~. _._,-~ ---J ~ ,: r~ m /-. o,« ~+ rwor ~ ~ ~~ ~ E RETAIL 1 ~' "° ; ~j (SHANE CO.) ~~ ~~ ~~~ , f i rw ~e r w &AASaciefes /~ , ~' satmumm. sdrtm °,. k.... ' W i , '~ ar aK nu Naeln s Z 1` , W 1 ,jw>srµp~ e xa ~~ a, ~ l warcr~anxas T ~ a' aN rso em Na Y raNNn~ (E) MONUMENT ~ O' GL~' F I PEI~NNIAL COLOR ~ ' IGN Q M PLANTIN s IBLMID ~ 1 COLORED & J I V m 1 SCORED CONCRETE ' Y I STEVENS CREEK BO ULEVARD PAVING Q W ~ ~ a U I W 2 ~ \~ A i 1 , LocAnoN ` OF BACKFLOW PREVENTION `, ,, DEVICE r~ ~- ro NBA4N (E) SOUND WALL •~ ('~y~ II R000IAIlCII ONLY. ~ ~.- % naaus+ s ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,,.. Ir o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~. rsa /~ .C ~ ~" m, ~ wow ~ ~ , ~ ~ ,~ ,, ~~ ~ ..., i r / ~ as ~..T s ~, 'Y.. ~„~. . ~ ron~NUN ' ~X ' 122 UNITS i a~~ NEw ~, ~.. ~,- MONUMENT ~ ~~"`~ 4 -STORY o~`, `' 'Q To~vN ~ r ~'~'~ ~~ p G SIGN ,' k SOUND WALL ~`~~' D~~"~~I~~ ® }~ W~.. r'~i jl f ~` ~ ~~ r xooostric rN~ G rNAOa~isTt N~~ ~ ~.__,.~LOCATION OF ~~ c TRANSFORMER 1 ~ ~ PAD ronos~ r X~ ~ ,..._-~ MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L5 1% CONCEPTI~-L STREETSCAPE PLAN FOR o > ~ RETAIL 1 (SHANE C0.) x ~ ~ v ~> 1/% m ~ z ~ ~ I O Q W ~ ~ ~"' V 1 + ~ } i i ~ o. U I ~ ~ o ~ ' j ~ W Q O Z ~ i U e j ~ ~ a I i ~ i~' i ! ' ! ~ l I ~ i' ~ i i i i J A W , . ' ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ! = W Q ~ ~~~ ° ~ ~ ;; ' z Q ~ c0 z ~ Q ~~ ~~ \ I ; , ~ ' fn ~ fn A ` x nia ~ ' I I M r ti \ ' ~ ii ~. % DATE ~ wuoosucNa"n. REV. NO. I REV. DATE [ 04.1 7.06 PAD -~ ------ ~1 \ •, ~r , `, '~ :1 --- CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (NORTH) SCALE:1'=20'-0' LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ PHASE 1 I " NORTH y NORTH L4 ~ JOB N0: i 1 ~ 1 -, ~~..-1 0 ~~~ r ,, ,~ _ __`- _.__.. -- ~d ~ - - ~ ,-~ ~ t '~ `} ``~ ., .:, .. ., ~ _ _..y ...~ _ _- ~~ `•• m~..m ----..... ~ 1 s ~, 1; i i is ;' , \\ ~b~ ~ ""~ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ J i.: ~ w ~ o ~ ~ _~ ~': ~ ~~ ~,,' i ~' ~ `~, ~' ~ ~ ; 1 ~ ~_ a• ~I ~~~ _ n l y_ \ ;J O r , • Z ~` / ~ ~\ ~ ~ ~' , C m `~ ~ ~ • m ; y r ~ , ' Z o ~. Z ~~ `~ n v ~ . m • C7 ~ ~ ~ D ~ ` ~ - _ ''` m ~ ., O ~ ,. ~~ C ~ r ' , Z m ~ < < ~, ~ D ~ a ~ . ; . x, N ~ b = -~._..... . ~ .... , :: - .~ . . ' ~ ,~ \ 2 a ` ' i. F ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ _ ~ . `~ / , ;~ ~• , ~., -, . -- \ ...~ - -- ..- ~..t.__ ~ - - - =3 ~... ~'/~ p 1 ~~ : - --- _ ~ ~ 1 - ~~-, -- - j1 1 w `.: ,... .\ i ., ~: ~ .. . ~,~ ,,.. c R...~. . ... k _ .. tl o .:~ : . 1 ~? ~:° ~- a.. ~. ( 1 . o.. ~ .. o W L . o Q ,\\i 1 ~ ~ ~ i~ (7 r T r ,,: ~ 1 ~ x ~- I z o .p b ~ <'^~ 1 m ,i 1~ w •:' i m $~a ~?' ~" ~ i ti c ! ~ •'~ 1 ~'~ i - ~,: >~ i ~ i 1 A d S~ I i f ~ ~ ~ ~, .' n 1 c 1 .. 1 a .. n' ~ 1 .. - 1 1 -~ 1 ~- ,; 1 -~ 1 1 to m 1 Cn ;rn 1 w m 1 N D 1 ~ ~ 1 w ~~ i ,~__ ~~ ~~~ ~: l- . --~ f'.-~ o ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY THE OAKS MIXED -USE PROJECT ,~~~ `~`~ ~ ~~ ~ r ~ ~ n m ~ 489 S. EL CAMIN ~ ~ ~~ (~ = m ~ ~ V ~ 0 REAL HYWAY 85 & STEVENS CREEK BLVD. ~ ~ # ~, z ~ ~ SAN MATED, CA 94401 CUPERTINO, CA ~M, ~,~ ~ ~~ s ars ~ a s ~ aee w smav ~ canes w x sea wea><e sa xr s sees ras a essee n a ins. ~ se ^ ~ rrc ~ wws ~[ w ses a sans sow s saa es w ware ees e s se sre aesr a se srsa a sasxs eenec iwr na erect r x rasa r wx.s~ EXHIBITS BEGIN HERE Steve Piasecki d~n~ ~ cc r~ li~~o~' From: Peter Pau [ppau@shpco.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:26 PM To: Steve Piasecki Cc: 'Karen Ngo' Subject: Oaks To follow up on our meeting yesterday, we have the following response to the recommended conditions of approval: #4 Project Phasing We have the option of office use being allowed on the first floor if we commence a single phase project. #5 Rear Setback Modified per our new site plan submitted today. #7b. We will only be required to modify the frontage to the east of the drive entrance (Shane Company). #9 Green Building Instead of a mandatory requirement, we will be required to make good faith effort to obtain LEED silver rating pending our further discussions with Marriott. However, we do think we can achieve the minimum LEED rating. #13 Building Materials and architecture/ Modified per our revised elevation submitted today. We ask that we not have to go back to Planning Commission and City Council. PARKING REQUIREMENT: DFFiTRffTPMIfi1D PROa1DED NIS BPACE6 UNDERORWND PARNWG PROVOEI) t658PADEi TOTAL lTa iPACEe IA NDI D Dl 4a , ~ ACCESSIBLE AND HEARlNJ NPA3IED RODMS SHALL SE PROVIDED N ACCpiDrWCE WfIH ALL THE AP0.ICABLE . ~ ; CODES OF THE AIJfHONtt HAVING JURWOILTDN. rec ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : O r of RECORD iHE ARna coNFWMED eY BI iAU a FDR EACH BPECIFG PROJECT. ALL ACCESSBLE A \ ~Q... , y a _ ~, s GVESTRDDMS MUST SE ElfERCONNECTWG RODLIS H+D THE TOTK NUMBER 91ULL AL90 CDNPLY RERI:l MMRIDTT DENCMD AND CONSTNUCTEDN CR . TFL Y~'J_ 1 ~ i B;B -~ ~... I \ ~ ~ ___ .__.._._ .. __. _ .. MA R.Y_. I ~~ ~ ~i i ~ ~1 ~ I i~ I ~. STDRY ~.r ~ ~ ~__~_-_ - . .. ... ... .. ... . __ ~ -- ----- ~ \ ~'o' c - . n .~ _ _ II.W.~ is ,. ,: B ~ I'*~ ~ fEDRETAL6 a 1- a_ ~ D Ia,BeD,aF }~ - . 1 r ~ ' o m W ~ O ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 - - r 1 ( T ~ ~ m ~suro fEI RETAE/ 4WDSF '. ' .~.. .: ' 'r .... D S S ~ CDRV~NTKN/ L+§~+E9 i B i D A_ ,... • IEI RETWLO B~MIT SF (EI RETAET ~ 1 1 1 S ~ ~ _ .. DwlMwt: - 1 ,b~ fl ... ~ .. ~ S ~ ! ., 3,300 S.F k ~-O~JBS I t I ~, DAIM DY. {~~ ~ - y y , a ...:4' \ _ ~, __ 1 ~' `~ )P: I B . I ma n R 0 0 ~ .c...u ~_-,~ ~_~ _ ~ _ 6 -.~-_ __ .. - BTEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD '~~ PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN A DE ANZACOILEGE CAMPUS M~ w w~ ~ ~ d W N U X_ a6 ~ m O to `~ y a Z i= o ~ w W ~ a U r 2 a a O U W a O ~ Z Q a d' (~ J J = W PATE: 5-30-07 RtV. ND. REV. DME PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN DR-2 JOB rw.: SHP03 NP~'F ~ ~P° R OF it " S~ ~ b ~~ c~ `~ ~ ~~ c C ~ 3 ~~ OF :,gli27E{ PA~I .:~ 23,1 Ol`F 61~ ~! . ,, !, Y 1• ' y'+ F s ~ 4~% ~-- ~~b `~ r" \ l r ~ ~ ~IGN v ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ %~ /~ i ~ ,• . ,_,~ ~tLOCATIN F '~ ° ~RANSFOR ER $ PAD I ~ ~- ~~ ~~ ~ ~ .~_ .'. .''' ~ _II I .• . '• ~s; _., f,~ ~ ...: i ~ i Y ~~~: •'t ~' / ~ ~~. `~~ ~ ` I j• xir SF ME~, PAD ~;~t3', I ~ ,~~~, MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA ~~~;! ~ Taisei Construction Corporation ,o>3~n Bm,>ad D R-7 opy~cxoroue.ac a ~~,,~~ EAST ELEVATION SCALE ' L32' :1'-0' WEST ELEVATION 6LALE Y32'; 1'-0' NORTH ELEVATION scuE ~•:,~~' SOUTH ELEVATION 6GPLE 3I3Y':1'-0' MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN ~, Taisei Construction Corporation J°~~~~ CUPERTINO, CA ~~ DR-8 \. C~ ~_ V