The URL can be used to link to this page

SS -1 Apple Campus 2 Project EIR Response to Comments Document, September 2013 ATTACHMENT SS-1 FINAL APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT r�-�.�rr �' .�+r'�.r ---- �� yk� -- - _._ _ �r. .. . , , - ��;�- ."��. --- . - __•`w..��-- .�� - — -- .� ..:� •. . .r�i �rs _ _ �►f:n`.. - .3;�y� ?l" Fr �� .'a� ' '�. T�� • ~ �� - f i �. � �"�. . � _ :u`� • C ._,, . * � •4LL _ �� . 7 �+� 'k.ss:.;.r , �-` �'� � •.x�' .s .: . "?"' �"'- '. � .::�=.u; :.yit"' .. ' .. . . .. . . .�.�.�:5� STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2011082055 LS � September 2o13 THIS EIR IS SUBJECT TO, AND THE APPLICANT HAS ELECTED TO PROCEED UNDER, CHAPTER 6.5 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 21178) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, WHICH PROVIDES, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT ANY NDICIAL ACTION CHALLENGING THE CERTIFICATION OF THE EIR OR THE APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE EIR IS SUBJECT TO THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH 1N SECTION 21185* TO 21186, INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.** A COPY OF CHAPTER 6.5 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 21178) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE WAS 1NCLUDED AS APPENDIX I TO THE DRAFT EIR. * THIS LANGUAGE IS PROVIDED 1N ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 21187 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. PLEASE NOTE THAT, AS OF SEPTEMBER 16, 2013, SECTION 21187 REFERS TO "THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SECTION 211782 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE."HOWEVER, THERE IS NO SECTION 211782. 1NSTEAD, THE RELEVANT PROCEDURES ARE SET FORTH 1N SECTION 21185 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. ** PLEASE NOTE THAT, AS OF SEPTEMBER 16, 2013,PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21185 STAT'ES IN PART THAT"THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE FILED 1N THE COURT OF APPEAL WITH GEOGRAPHIC JURISDICTION OVER THE PROJECT."THAT CODE SECTION WAS THE SUBJECT OF LITIGATION COMMENCED 1N THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY (PLANNING&CONSERVATION LEAGUE V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. RG12626904). ON JLTNE 3, 2013, THE COURT ISSUED ITS JUDGMENT THAT PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21185, SUBDIVISION(a)(1) IS FACIALLY UNCONSTTTUTIONAL AND VOID BECAUSE IT RESTRICTS THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT AND SUPERIOR COURTS, AS CONFERRED BY ARTICLE VI, SECTION 10 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION. AT THE TIME OF PUBLICATION OF THIS RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT, SENATE BILL 743 (PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE)HAD BEEN APPROVED BY BOTH THE STATE SENATE AND THE STATE ASSEMBLY. THE DEADLINE FOR THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA TO APPROVE THE BILL IS OCTOBER 13, 2013. FOR THE MOST CURRENT VERSION OF CHAPTER 6.5,PLEASE REFER TO http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/. THE STATUS OF SECTION 21185(a)(1)MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE AFTER THE PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT. INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE STATUS OF SECTION 21185(a)(1)WHEN CONTEMPLATING ANY ACTION INVOLVING CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THIS LITIGATION ON THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. FINAL APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2011082055 Submitted to: Cit�-of Cupertino Communit�-Development Department 10300 Toi7e Avenue Cupertino, Califomia 95014 Prepa�ed b�-: LSA Associates, Inc. 2215 Fifth Street Berlceley, California 94710 510.540.7331 LS � September 2o13 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. 1NTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT.................................. 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS....................................................................... 1 C. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................2 IL LIST OF COMMENTING AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND 1NDIVIDUALS.............3 A. ORGANIZATION OF COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES................................3 B. LIST OF AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND 1NDIVIDUALS COMMENTING ON THE DRAFT EIR........................................................................................................3 IIL COMMENTS AND RESPONSES............................................................................................ 11 A. STATE, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL AGENCIES..........................................................23 B. ORGANIZATIONS..........................................................................................................60 C. 1NDIVIDUALS ................................................................................................................78 D. PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS................................................................................ 127 E. COMMENTS FROM 1NDIVIDUALS ON THE MERITS OF THE PROJECT........... 132 IV. TEXT REVISIONS ................................................................................................................. 13� APPENDICES Appendiz A: Comment Letters P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�a�„�i�oaco�-�-TOC.ao�(oe�i7a>FL�'�L 1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR TABLE OFCONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure III-4 (Revised): Conceptual Site Plan—August 2013..........................................................25 Figure RTG1: Visual Simulation: Loolcing South bet��een Nightingale Avenue and Peacocic Avenue on East Homestead Road.........................................27 Figure V.I-3 (Revised): Eiisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities...................................................32 Figure III-4 (Revised): Conceptual Site Plan—August 2013........................................................ 136 Figure III-17a(Revised): Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................... 145 Figure IV-2 (Revised): Zoning Designations................................................................................ 148 Figure IV-3 (Revised): Mitigation Measure PLAN-3 ................................................................... 149 Figure V.I-3 (Revised): Eiisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities................................................. 151 TABLES Table RTGL Trips Generated by Select Residences North of East Homestead Road ................. 19 Table RTC-2: Distribution of Trips on Pruneridge Avenue...........................................................20 Table RTC-3: Levels of Service for Requested Intersections........................................................29 Table RTC-4: Bacicground AM Off-Ramp Queuing (in feet)........................................................40 Table RTGS: Caltrain AM Pealc Hour Capacity...........................................................................48 Table V.I-10: Eiisting Plus Project Free��ay Segment Levels of Seivice ....................................51 Table RTC-6: Pruneridge Avenue Pealc Hour Roacl��ay Volumes................................................96 Table II-1: Summa�y of Impacts and Mitigation Measures from the EIR.............................. 137 Table V.I-10: Eiisting Plus Project Free��ay Segment Levels of Service .................................. 152 P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�a�„�i�oaco�-�-TOC.ao�(oe�i7a>FL�'�L 11 L INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT This document has been prepared to respond to comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report(EIR)prepared for the Apple Campus 2 Project(project). The project is proposed for an approiimatel�- 176-acre site in the Cit�-of Cupertino (CitS-). The Draft EIR identifies the potential environmental consequences associated��ith implementation of the project. This Response to Comments (RTC)Document provides responses to comments on the Draft EIR and malces revisions to the Draft EIR in response to those comments or to cla�ify, amplify-, or malce insignificant modifica- tions to the Draft EIR This document,together��ith the Draft EIR, constitutes the Final EIR for the proposed project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS According to the Califomia Envuonmental Qualit�-Act(CEQA),lead agencies a�e requued to consult ��ith public agencies having jurisdiction over a proposed project and to provide the general public ��ith an opportunit5-to comment on the Draft EIR. The Cit�-of Cupertino circulated a Notice of Prepa�ation(NOP) on August 19, 2011,noti�-ing responsible agencies and interested pa�-ties that an EIR«ould be prepared for the project and indicat- ing the envuonmental topics anticipated to be addressed. The scoping period,initially planned to end on September 19,2011,«as eitended to October 5, 2011 to allo« for further public comment. In addition, a public scoping session��as held on September 8, 2011. Public notices for the scoping session��ere mailed to approiimatel�-20,000 households in Cupertinq advertisements��ere placed in local ne��spapers, and the CitS-posted the NOP and scoping session notice on the Cit�-'s��ebsite. Notices��ere also sent to households in Santa Cla�a and Sunn�,-vale that a�e��ithin 1,000 feet of the project site. Comments received b�-the Cit�-on the NOP and at the public scoping meeting��ere talcen into account during the preparation of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR«as macle a�ailable for public revie« on June 6, 2013, and distributed to applicable local,regional, State, and federal agencies. Paper and CD copies of the Draft EIR��ere available at the Cit�-of Cupertino Communit�-Development Department and a digital version of the document �vas a�ailable on the Cit�-'s��ebsite for the project(http:/h��.cupertino.or�/indei.aspi?pa�e=1107). Notice of a�ailabilit�-of the Draft EIR��as made in several��a�-s. The Cit�-sent postcards announcing the availabilit�-of the Draft EIR to all mailing acldresses«ithin Cupertino, and to mailing acldresses ��ithin 1,000 feet of the project site outside of Cupertino. In acldition,in accordance��ith CEQA,the Cit�-mailed the Notice of Availabilit�-to all properties acljacent to the project site, and on-site notices ��ere also posted on each pa�cel constituting the project site and at Cit�-Hall. The Notice of Availabilitv ��as also posted on the Cit�-'s main��ebsite and the project��ebsite. The Cit�-also sent emails announc- ing the availabilit�-of the Draft EIR to all persons��ho had indicated an interest in the project. A press release��as also sent out at the same time. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT��„�i�i-r„eoa��r�o„ao�(o��i ia>FL�'�L 1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR I. INTRODUCTION The CEQA-mandated 45-da5-public comment period ended on Ju1�-22, 2013. Comments on the Draft EIR could be submitted in��riting to the Communit�-Development Depa�tment or posted on the Cit�-'s��ebsite for the project. The Cit�-also held a public meeting during the comment period, on June 26, 2013, at��hich the public��as encouraged to malce comments. At the meeting,the CitS- provided: cards for hand-«�itten comments; access to computers,laptops, or other devices for comments to be posted directl�-to the CitS--sponsored«ebsite for public comments; and facilities for oral comments. The Cit�-macle a�ailable more than 200 digital versions of the Draft EIR to attendees on USB storage devices. The Cit�-also handed out, and macle a�ailable at Cit�-Hall,public comment cards��ith a"QR" (Quicic Response) Code duecting interested parties to the CitS--sponsored��ebsite for public comments. Written comments received on the Draft EIR during the 45-day public comment period a�e contained in this RTC Document. C. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This RTC Document consists of the follo��ing chapters: • ChapteN I:IntNOdz�ction. This chapter discusses the purpose and organization of this RTC Document and ho�� the RTC Document fits into the Final EIR, and summa�izes the environmental revie�� process for the project. • ChapteN II: List of Commenting Agencies, ONganizations and Individz�als. This chapter contains a list of agencies, organizations, and individuals«ho submitted«ritten comments on the Draft EIR during the public revie�� period. • ChapteN III: Comments and Responses. This chapter contains a��ritten response for each comment on envuonmental issues received during the public revie�� period. Each response is lce�-ed to the associated comment letter and comment number. Reproductions of all comment letters received on the Draft EIR a�e provided in Appendii A. • ChapteN IV.�DNaft EIR Revisions. This chapter contains tezt revisions to the Draft EIR in response to comments received and responses provided, or in order to cla�ifi-,ampli�-or malce insignificant modif�ications to the Draft EIR. Underlined teit represents language that has been aclded to the Draft EIR;teit«ith�has been deleted from the Draft EIR. Revisions to figures a�e also provided,��here appropriate. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT��„�i�i-r„eoa��r�o„ao�(o��i ia>FL�'�L 2 IL LIST OF COMMENTING AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS This chapter presents a list of comment letters' received during the public revie« period and describes the organization of the letters and comments that are provided in Chapter III, Comments and Responses, of this document. A. ORGANIZATION OF COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES Comment letters received on the Draft EIR are grouped and coded b�-the affiliation of the commenter, as follo��s: State,regional, and local agencies (A); organizations (B);individuals (C);public meeting comments (D); and comments from individuals solel�-on the merits of the project that do not raise environmental issues (E). Appendii A includes a reproduction of each comment letter received on the Draft EIR. The comment letters are numbered consecutivel�-follo��ing the A, B, C, D and E designations. The letters a�e annotated according to the follo��ing code: A#-# State, Regional, and Local Agencies B#-# Organizations C#-# Individuals D#-# Public Meeting Comments E#-# Comments from Individuals on the Merits of the Project The letters are numbered and comments«ithin each letter a�e numbered consecutivel�-after the hyphen. For instance, comment A1-3 is the third discrete comment in the first letter submitted b�-a State, Regional, or Local Agency. Chapter III includes a��ritten response for each comment on environmental issues received during the public revie« period. B. LIST OF AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS COMMENTING ON THE DRAFT EIR Comments submitted to the Cit�-during the public revie« period a�e listed on the follo«ing pages. i'`Letters"include paper letters submitted b�•mail,fa�,or email attachment emails:discrete postings about the Draft EIR or project on the Cin�'s�vebsite:and comment cards submitted during the public meeting on the Draft EIR. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�a i��L„rotc �,re�s.ao�(oe��iia>FL�'�L j E�� a Ww6 p � �� .� �O; Q C� C] Q a� � r�i �NQ '��7 cC �a6 a F� ��; � oaz ° O C3Q N�+ U O WF �J �6� � U O � N 9 � Q � �j Q � ti �+ W � � � � .� O ,r w° _ '� U ' W O � � "a � a � c�i-�C � � � O C� z p O � ryi� � � N � U (� P� F"r � 0 N � � N N � y,V,� ca c�n ° � � ° � � � �' � � � o � o � � z � �, � � '� � � � o s� � � � � � � z � � P, �. o o � � aU ? � � U � � � U U o � o .� o a U W y � s� � � � �� a� � ' w � �� w � U � � o � o a�i � o x � � o �, � � � o � °� o o a� �' C� a� � 'C � s� '� �C -a py o � ,� �U Q c� .a ,? -V-' s�-� � � � "~�' � �� N O '� N � cC w •`� c� c� ai� P� a� .� � c� v� � o a� �l �' a� �l � � o +' � U c� � v� � w c� +� w �' � .� y c'�i o �' Q � � � � ° o � �-aU ,�' � '—'a�. �3 ,�' �' � ° �' �� .� o a� Ua � � U � UU o � U � U `� U �' � a O � � o � � � '� � � � o a� � '� � o � v' o � � � � o � a � s� � � � o v� � � U � � � o o ° �, o � o � a� � o � �-,'' � o o .� � � � � �� Q � U � �� Q � � � w + U '�' � �' o � �''�' �' �' ° � o °' :'� ur� � °' ;x p ur.� � � � � ti .� � � � � d' U � UUUUP; v� v� � vU W Uv� ,� U W � Uv� U � P� � � � v� v� v� � � � � � � � P, �� W s� � � a�i o� � � '� � � � W � �� q a� 0 �3 � °' � -a � '�'i .� U � � � � c�C O s� � � P-i s� m +' '� �I U � � � � � � w � � � � � ° � � � � °�' `� � � p � �' `� � o � � � � � � � � � p �, U -a � � � � � �� o �, � P� � o �' o U ,� � � � a � � � � � 2 �. '� � � .� ° a�i W � � o �� a�i o �' O � o Q w 4 � s� s� � o � s� a� o � � � � � � � ,ti � � a�i , a� � Q � Q � � '� � � � .� � � a�i � � � � � o ° °� � � Q ,� y ,�.��. a�i '��" � v, � �, oOQU ow0 � w � � � �-a � �' a�i � �'ri� � � � � °�' •d � �3 � N �' � a�i .�' N U o a� � 0 W � �a o � � � � �' w � � Q U °' ,°' � � � o o y � °�' '� � � � °' o -a ° .�� °°py � Q '� w° � � � +a'� '� � � 3fxa o � a� � � �' � r�/� �j � � � � � � �' c�3U �' � a � � � U � � � � � �y..� � `� � � .� �' �' � � v� � � � �'C� .� '-� a� U � ,�' a� � �' � � y U "�'. '6 � '� >, U s.r O O s'"�i'" �+ '1�"" '—' �+ � O y:. � '^' +�-' N � � aD � 'a o a� a� � � �' a� � o � o �' �' � �d `� �i .� o �� ' � � � � � � i ,� � °� � � U � � � W � � � w � U � � � v� � ZQQv� Pa � UOQtia � wv� v� � tiQ ' � M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � z � N O� N N N O� N N �Z N O� l� O OO � l� O O� Ni N Ni � �O �O l� �O � O� �O �O N N o .. A c� �,c� c� c� � c� c� � c� ,� ,� ,� c� � c� ,� ,� ,� N ,� � � �n c� c� c� c� c� � � ��,� �� '" ,�� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� �, a� a� �� w� '� ti '� '� '� '� '� '� F" '� '� '� '� ti � � � � � � � � � �c � � ,cC ,cC � � ,� ,� E F,o � �, �, �, �, �, �, �, � �, �, �, �, ti, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, / � � �, �, �' �' U 6� GT� � N Q w � � -7-i �--� M R � \O l� 00 � f� O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 T O �--i N M ¢ � r"' G�' W � � � � � � � � � CQ CQ W � CQ CQ � � � �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� N N N N o �a .a � C7 C(� CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ o w '�' � � ° a w w E�� Vl zW6w �H� �� W� �Oq Q�� y a„ F�Q �Nz �a6 � ��v; ,� Oa,'� oUp ? O � �,�jF � d d E"p,6 A' � � ��yN �6� �' 0 0 6 � � a � � � P" O O � a W � / � c�C � � � � � �' � - � r,y� � � � � N W 't" � ��F"" C' r�i� � � V '� '� O � O '~-' � � vi � � � � � � � O z � � 0 �-r '� .� � N O � p O � cC 7-Nr � N � a" �""'-r v� v� "'�� " � O c �' � � � � a � w � � � '� -�ax � � wx ° � � � �� x� � � o ca � o �� o .� � � �'�+�- � � � '�,-'- '�' � '� '�+�- °' ° a 'y � � � � o � U z U W � Uac7ZQ � w °ti' � rxw � Z � wQ ¢ ¢ � x ¢ ¢ w °ti' > � Q ¢ z w � M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w � �O v� �O �O N N N N N N � � � � � � � � �O O O� O� O� O� O� l� l� � � � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � � � AF"r F"r F"r F"r J, J, J, J, J, J, J, J, J, J, J,~ ~ J, J, J, � ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti a s, a�"i � � �--� N M R � \O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 T O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 T O y � � � � � V � � � � V � � � � V � � � V V � � � V V � � � V � � � Z ,1' N � � G � � � � w v' ° � ° � � N U 0 p �'p O 0 r`� O � ti N '� 0 S � S � -a N � � � � � � cC � F�+ � . O � �N 'X'i � � cC � � ,s-i�r � � � � .� ,rN-I � y..', � 'O � 0 � ,rN-' 'Oa V� N � �v�,i pbDq p � � �' F-� O vi '� v„ v„ �" w r,�.� ,� P� "�,-I' �.," '� r� 'X'i 4-i � "a c� � � s� ��, � � O o �' � '� � � � � w�' � � � � � `� '.� � � � ,�, c� � v' � � p" � wc7xx � � £ � �' '� � ,� ,x ;� �' � �' � �' � � � ,� �' � � �' � � �° �° .a� � o � o a� �� .° .° � 'i o � .� o a� '� '� ,�' o a� � '� 'i � °? � � � � U F-� f� � C7v� v� f� � f� f� � � � tiC7QP� W tiv� Q � � Q � tiC7 � � W o a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � � � �OO Vl �OO OO N � � O 00�O �O Oi 00 l� l� vl � M M N N � O 00 00�O � � N N �--� �--� �--� �� M N N N N �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� A N ', ', ', ','� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N F"r F"r F"r � z � '� '� '� '� ti ti ti ti ti � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ti ti ti q .. �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, � � � E o � E 6�' .7 � � � N Q w a�.� � � �--� N M R � \O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 T O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 T O ¢ �'W y � ,.�y U U U U U U U U U �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� N N N N N N N N N N M o V � � � � V � � � V V � � � V V � � � V � 6 F .� y � O �a Fti W U a w w E�� \O zW6w �H� �� W� �Oq Q�� y a„ F�Q �Nz �a6 ��v, O a�'� '� o U p � Q a 6 'O � W P.N 'L � �6� Q 6 " � � ,Oa S J, ti w Q N cC � N F"r .r � � � � - '� O � � � � vi v� � w s'�-� Py S cC O '� ,y' �' � ,� � O N 0 b4 � '" �" v' � p ,sJ ,sJ +' �� N ,� i�-i o � "a v� N �" � � N � '� '-� p `i' N � O ¢c�� W S� � � ti � cC � O � � � � � � � �s',-I' P� � cC r� V� � � ,r ca °� � o 'ap� � raU � � � � o o •a °� � �' U C7 � � �, � ca � � � x `� �°. x ,� � � �°,�-'' � � � :-a ,� � � � ay ,� � ^' `� � U z o �' � � � � ,� .� .° � a� � .� �' � � � o � � � a� .� �� '� o � � �, U aC7tiv� wv� � r� Q � � C7 U � � r� H � v� r� � r� v� � � r� Hr� z w � M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w � l� v� � � � � N N l� l� �O �O �O �O �O OO O N N N N N N N N N N N �--i M N N N N N N N N N N N � A N N N N N N N N F"r F"r F"r F"r F"r F"r F"r ', N ', ', ', ', ', � � � � � � � � � ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti � ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti a s, � � T O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 T O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � �O a+ O O O O O O O O O O �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i r.., �." �O T O� O� O� T O� O� O� O� T �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� � Z V V � � � V � � � � V � � V � � � � V � � � � V � � � � � � � � .� � � � � � � .? � � O � 'O � � � N p 0 � s�-� � 2 � � O � O .a � � p vi y � N ,.�.� �, � ,�+�y m � N�' ^' � O O � � � i""-i c�C � p �r' N � � � a�"i �,� � a�i � U � � � o o � ° � � ° � � o �' �' � � �7..� U s� c� '� �' ',� � P-� � � � N Q � �� C� � W � � � '� � Z N � 4. Q, w � � '� � o N G � �� '' -6 V � ,� � c�d ,�' Py a' � �, �' � �-' �' � c� � � x � � � � cC cC O .r � "�� +-i cd „r",� �""-r F." cC c� � '� � � Q ti ti LT� � � � � Q '� Q �l � V� ti � ti � � ti C� � � � ti � � LT� o a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � � N N � � O � O M O O O O O O� �O �O �O �O �O �O v� v� v� �00 l� l� l� � � �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N �--� �--� �--� �--� F, A ',� N�.. N N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. N�.. � z ti ti ti ti ti � ti � ti � ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti p � W^ E 6� � ..�, i. r' p� y � �--� N M R � �O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 T O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 ¢ �, �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �ot� rt� t� rt� t� t� t� r00000000x00000000 �W � �/� U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U � F ^ O ma W U a w w E�� zW6w �H� �� W� �Oq Q�� ya� F�Q �Nz �a6 �� OQ� o U p �W F F W a N A�� 6� F�I � � W � � �i N �' w � '� N N f'' ',�� cC W- � y�' � T � Sti �T Sy Y CC Q .Ur W � � � � � � •� ,-� � V o N cv ,�' � � m 'U � .� "i ,� �r � --i .�-i W � Q � .� � o o �; �,�� .� � � o � � � � �,� � � � o ,� .a � � � � � � � � � � � 0. � o � � � � o �' 3 �' � P, � � � � � � '� � � o ¢ � f�l � � � '—' P� � F-� `�' � � W � a� .� � � i �,'-' � '�' � � � � 'U [� c7 � 7-� 7-� ,x �a� � � 'i. �! c� � � o N �� ti � � � a� � � a� � � � c� � � � � '� � � � � �a a�i � c� `� � O � � ' � �a�i � a�i '�" � O .5��' �' z p ca � � i'"-� i'"-� �""-r �' .i � N ca ,b4 U N N N E, U �" �° �° a � � Htia Qti0. U � W0. wW �" � P! P! C/� ti � -7-� P! QtiQU '�" U � z w � M M M M M M M M M � O O O O O O O O O � N N N N N N N N N w a�+ �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O � � N N N N N N N N N � A � � � � � � � � � a ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti s, a�"i y � �--� N M R � \O l� 00 T \p l� �O O� O �--� N M R � \O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 O� O a+ £.' �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� N N N N M M M M M M M M M M R R R R R R R R R R � � Z A A A A A A A A A F� W W F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� H � 0 �y -�" a � � a "� � � U U 0 � � ,y � � N N ~ � � V � � � � `� .� � � � 2 � � � � � w � � � � � � � o � � � � �� a�i � � `� �a� a� ¢' F" � � � a� c°�i `� � N � � . � � x 3 � � � a�i ;.°�� a�i `� \ � �� ° � � [� °' � � � '-a '� � i � � � � � P� � � � x a o a� v� � v� ,� � � � ° � 0 � o '� -� � � � � � w � ,� ,�' 3 `� r� � � � 3 ° � � � >, � o � P, � � � � r� � �! � °' �C �°� � � � � � � " Q � '� � � ,� � � � ;� C7 o � � � � � �" � �U � � � � ,� �ai � � o o a�i ,� � � ;� .� � � � � � � � � � � � U rxQ � Q � rxQ [� r�iti � v� rxv� 3rx � � rxrxrxwQv� wz � ti � � � ti � � W � s � a M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O � ° N N N N N N N N N N � � � � � � � � � � � � � � N N N N N N N N N N �I A � N N N N N N N N N N � � z � � � � � � � � � � � � � _ � � � � 6 E o � Fti � � � N Q w a�.� � �U-I �--i N M R � \O l� �O T = � �--i N M R � \O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � \O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � ¢ �'� c � -a AAAAAAAAA ~ W W W W W W W W W �" �" �" �" �" '" '" '" '" '" NNNNNN �W � y� � Ca ,'�'� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W � F F-� .� 0 O m W al � U a w w E�� 00 zW6w �H� �� W� �Oq Q�� m a„ pp �Nz � �a6 � ��; � �� y C.i C}p ',�y O cv �a6 � O � � waN V� 6� � �' �" � 6 � N W N a � ,"� � � � � W � � � � � � P�-i p 0 cyC � 0 '��! � N � � cC w „� �+ V� r� � N �' ,�' r� N O '� '—' ,"1i .a "�I '� �`.3 O "~�" r� F-i N � � N r� U 'S�" "a � O W � � o a� �' �' �, �� x � ° � o ,� � � � o � � a� o � a o z p a � � � � � '� v� � � N � � � ,x � '" ,� '� � � � � �' ;�,' -a Q o w y ,-a eq Z ;�' � � a� a� � o a� � m a� o � c� c� P, Q � -a '� ca � z � � � � � � � � ,'� � � o W �' '� � ,�' �' � � cn'a P-� `� �' W ¢ £ � � � �� -a � �, � x a� �, ti � � � � a4 � � -a � z o o r' o � � � �' '� � � '� '� � �' �' � i � � � � � � o � � � � o � �, U Qa -� awQti � > -� � �° � -� tiHP� W Qti �° v� P� QU � � QP� C7 z � � 0 U � W � � � � a s, � � �--� N M R � �O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 O� O r.�'., £.' �O �O 00 00 �O �O 00 00 00 O� T O� O� O� O� T O� O� O� O O O O O O O O O O � � Z W W F� F� W W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� � �bA � Q x � N W � � � 2 � � ~ 0 � � o � � �°, � .� � � � � � w a�"i � ''� o o '� Q-'�' ,x � � � '� -a � � � ,� �� a' � � \ � a� + o � � � � � � ° � ' � `�' 'U v�, a� � '� � � a�i � �' o `� � � °� � � c`�iP� � � � � ,�,' � � U N �aiU `� � PaPa � � a� � H � F� � � 'U � � � �' c� c� s� � � p� '� � � �� '� ,� �, � � � � �' a� .. � a� 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 Y � � � Y Y �I O 0 � � � U �I �� ,� � � � C� p� r'�' ti Q! � 'r-� V� V� V� v V� V� V� � Q! � � P-� Q! Q! P-� Q! -�-� � P-� P-� U � � � o a � � H � � A ° o q z o� � W^ E 6� � ..�, i. r' p� +,�,, � �--� N M R � �O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 O� O �--i N M R � �O l� 00 O� O ¢ �,� � � v� v� v� v� v� v� v� v� v� �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �o �ot� rt� t� t� rrt� t� t� oo �W � �/� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W � F ^ O �a' cJ W a w w E�� O1 zW6w �H� �� W� �Oq Q�� m a„ pp �Nz � �a6 � ��; � O a�'� 'y o U p ,.�y �W F F'r F a 6 � W P.N V] �6� � � � � � ti � W � Qy 7-r a ,S�"y � y � � � W `� � � � � a�n � W �, �� p� � o � � � Q � .� �--� `� � y s� N .� � Q � � Z � � v� � � � �a �' N .� �, � � � �� a� a� � � U � � c�7 ¢ � c� � av� ww�' � Qc� z � � 0 U � W � � � � a s, � � �orooao � NM � v� �o � ooa y N N N N M M M M M M M M M M � �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� � Z W W F� F� F� W F� F� F� F� W F� F� F� U � � � /�� V '� N � `� � 2 � . � w � � � o � � � � a� F� �,P! � c� � � r� a� � p� � � ... � c� ,� � � a� y a� � � � � � .� �� .a � o � ° o � � � � � � � � � � �� o � � � � � a��n� o � � QQ ¢ c7Qac7Qc7wU ¢ c7rz ¢ � a � � H � � A � � q z o� � W^ E 6� � ..� i. "' �w y � �--i N M R � �O l 00 O� O �--i N M R � J O w y �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i �--i N N N N N N ¢ �� --� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� �--� ¢w � �/� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ° F ^ O �a' cJ W a w w LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR II. LIST QF COMMENTING AGENQIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS This page intentionally left blank. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�a i��L„rotc �,re�s.ao�(oe��iia>FL�'�L 1 O IIL COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Written responses to each comment letter received on the Draft EIR are provided in this chapter. Letters received during and after the public revie« period on the Draft EIR a�e provided in theu entiret�-. Each letter is immediatel�-follo��ed b�-responses lce�-ed to the specific comments. The letters a�e grouped b5-the af£iliation of the commenter as follo��s: State,regional, and local agencies (A); organizations (B);individuals (C);public meeting comments (D); and comments from individuals solel�-on the merits of the project that do not raise environmental issues (E). Please note that some teit«ithin the comment letters has not been numbered because it does not raise environmental issues or relate to the aclequac5-of the information or anal�-sis��ithin the Draft EIR, and therefore no response is required. Teit revisions to the Draft EIR made in response to comments received and responses provided, or to cla�ify, amplifi-or malce insignificant modifications to the Draft EIR, a�e included in the responses. Underlined teit represents language that has been aclded to the Draft EIR;teit«ith�has been deleted from the Draft EIR. All teit revisions a�e listed in the order in��hich the�-��ould appea�in the Draft EIR(by page number)in Chapter IV, Teit Revisions, of this RTC Document. Man�-of the comments received on the Draft EIR involve variations of severallce�-issues. In order to consolidate responses to questions and comments related to these topics, and to acldress concerns comprehensively,master responses have been prepared. Master Responses a�e included for the follo��ing topics and are referenced in subsequent responses, as appropriate. 1. Significant and Una�oidable Impacts 2. Project Merits 3. Mitigation Nezus 4. Nitrogen Deposition 5. Public Access Through Project Site 6. Project Trip Distribution 7. Cut-Through Traffic 8. Adequac5-of Transportation Demand Management(TDM)Penalties 9. Monitoring TDM Program 10. Median on East Homestead Road 11. Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure 12. Trip Cap 13. Calabazas Creelc Trail 14. Ne�� Free��a�-Ramps 15. School Busing Program P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 11 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Master Response#1: Significant and Unavoidable Impacts Certain traffic-related impacts a�e identified in the Draft EIR as significant and una�oidable even though feasible mitigation measures are identified that��ould reduce the impacts to a less-than- significant level. Several commenters suggest that these signif�icant and una�oidable findings a�e not appropriate. Pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2),the significant and unavoidable conclusion is appropriate in these cases because implementation of the identified mitigation measures is not��ithin the responsibilit�-and jurisdiction of the CEQA lead agenc5-,��hich is the Cit�-of Cupertino. For instance,implementation of Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 (construction of an additional��estbound lane at the intersection of Wolfe Roacl/I-280 Northbound Ramps)��ould reduce Impact TRANS-1 (unacceptable operations at the intersection of Wolfe Road/I-280 Northbound Ramps resulting from project traf£ic)to a less-than-significant level. Because the I-280 Northbound Ramps are a State transportation facilit�-under the jurisdiction of the State of California Depa�tment of Transportation (Caltrans),neither the project sponsor nor the Cit�-of Cupertino can ensure implementation of Mitigation Measure TRANS-L Thus,lacicing any assurance that Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 can and��il1 be implemented b�-Caltrans,the Draft EIR concludes that Impact TRANS-1 is significant and una�oidable not��ithstanding the CitS-'s and Apple's commitment to continue to��orlc��ith the agencies that ha�e jurisdiction over implementation of Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 and other, simila�measures outside the Citv's control. Pursuant to CEQA Gz�idelines Section 15126.4, "[m]itigation measures must be full�-enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legally-binding instruments." (See also CEQA Section 21081.6(b).) Because the Cit�-lacks such legally-binding instruments to ensure that Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 and other mitigation measures outside its responsibilit�-and jurisdiction a�e fu11�- enforceable,the Cit�-cannot guarantee implementation of such mitigation measures. Therefore, identi�-ing Impact TRANS-1 (and other impacts for��hich the identified mitigation measures outside the jurisdiction of Cupertino) as significant and una�oidable is appropriate. The identification of these impacts requiring eitra-jurisdictional mitigation as signif�icant and una�oid- able is also consistent��ith the findings required to be macle b�-leacl agencies for each of the signifi- cant environmental effects identif�ied in an EIR pursuant to C'EQA Gz�idelines Section 15091 and Public Resources Code Section 21081(a). One of these findings (`Such changes or alterations are ��ithin the responsibilit�-and jurisdiction of another public agenc5-and not the agenc5-malcing the finding. Such changes have been aclopted b5-such other agenc5-or can and should be aclopted b5-such other agenc5-.")��ould be made b�-the Cit�-for each of the significant una�oidable impacts for��hich a mitigation measure��ould reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level, but the mitigation measure is not under the control of the Cit�-. The mitigation measures outside the responsibilit�-and jurisdiction of the Cit�-require that Apple fund,help fund, or construct the phy-sical improvements,if and��hen the responsible jurisdictions grant necessai}-approvals for the mitigations. This requuement is incorpo- rated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project. Some commenters have stated that because certain traffic impacts ha�e been identified as signif�icant and una�oidable,the Cit�-«ould ha�e no obligation to mitigate these impacts. Such statements a�e incoi7ect. Leacl agencies must identifi-feasible mitigation measures for all significant impacts per CEQA Sections 21002, 21002.1(a), 21081(a); and C'EQA Sections 15091(a), 15021(a)(2), 15126.4(a). As required b5-CEQA Sections 21080(a) and (a)(1), "��ith respect to each significant effect,"the lead agenc5-must identi�-"[c]hanges or alterations [that] have been required in,or incorporated into,the project��hich��ill mitigate or avoid"the impact. The lead agenc5-may then eiplain,if applicable,that P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 12 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES implementation of the measures is not��ithin its responsibilit�-and jurisdiction and the measures "have been, or can and should be, aclopted b5-that other agenc5-"(C'EQA Section 21081(a)(2)) and/or that the measures a�e infeasible (CEQA Section 20181(a)(3)). The leacl agenc5-may find that certain impacts remain significant despite mitigation, but conclude that ovei7iding benefits out��eigh these effects (CEQA Section 20181(b));ho��ever,this finding does not relieve the lead agenc5-of its obligations to identifi-feasible mitigation measures under C'EQA Section 20181(a). If the proposed project is approved,the Cit�-��i11 require that Apple: (i)��orlc in good faith��ith the applicable jurisdictions to permit the identified phy-sical improvements and (ii) fund the estimated cost identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for each of the eitra-jurisdio- tional mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR These funds«i11 be submitted to the agenc5- ��ith jurisdiction over each improvement for use in constructing the improvement or an altemate improvement in the project vicinit�-that can be demonstrated,to the satisfaction of the Cit�-of Cupertino Director of Public Worlcs,to reduce the identif�ied traffic-related impacts. In addition, Apple has agreed to collaborate and coordinate«ith these other jurisdictions to construct and/or fund the identified mitigations��hen the jurisdictions approve the measures. Where physical mitigation measures a�e feasible but outside of the Cit�-'s jurisdiction,the Cit�-��i11 continue to monitor the progress of implementing the mitigation measures and��ill continue to��orlc��ith Apple and the other agencies. In this��ay,the mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR a�e designed to comply-��ith the requirement of CEQA to mitigate significant impacts to the eitent feasible. Master Response#2: Project Merits Pursuant to CEQA Gz�idelines Section 15088, a lead agency is required to evaluate "comments on environmental issues"received on a Draft EIR. Similarly,pursuant to CEQA Gz�idelines Section 15132, a Final EIR must provide responses on1�-to "signif�icant envuonmental points raised in the revie« and consultation process."Accordingly,detailed responses are provided on1�-for comments received on the Draft EIR that raise issues conceming the"environment."As defined in CEQA Section 21060.5, "environment means the phy-sical conditions��hich eiist��ithin the a�ea��hich��i11 be affected b5-a proposed project,including land,air,«ater,minerals,flora,fauna,noise, objects of historic or aesthetic significance." Economic costs and benefits a�e outside the scope of environmental issues as defined b�-CEQA and need not be evaluated in an EIR C'EQA Gz�idelines Section 15131 states: "Economic or social effects of a project shall not be treated as significant effects on the envuonment. An EIR ma�-trace a chain of cause and effect from a proposed decision on a project through anticipated economic or social changes resulting from the project to phy-sical changes caused in turn b�-the economic or social changes. The intermediate economic or social changes need not be anal�-zed in an�-detail greater than necessa��-to trace the chain of cause and effect. The focus of the anal�-sis shall be on the phy-sical changes." Pursuant to CEQA,the Draft EIR is a disclosure document that identifies the significant impacts of the project, but does not contain conclusions about the merits of the project,including��hether the project is "too big,"��hether the project is right for the community,or��hether the project should be approved. Those decisions a�e made b�-the Cit�-of Cupertino Cit�-Council,follo«ing consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Rather,the Draft EIR evaluates the size of the project in the conteit of applicable significance thresholds identified b�-the Cit�-. This evaluation P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES includes an assessment of��hether the size of the project��ould create a significant adverse effect on the phy-sical environment. For instance,if a project building is sufficientl�-tall that it��ould blocic a public vie�� of a scenic vista,that��ould be considered a significant impact pursuant to the Cit�-'s significance thresholds, as eiplained on pages 207 to 211 of the Draft EIR. Comments conve5-ing support of or opposition to the project,or comments pertaining solely-to economic or social effects of the project,��ithout reference to environmental issues, a�e included in this Response to Comments Document, but detailed responses a�e not provided. Ho«ever, decision- malcers��ill talce these comments into account��hen considering project approval even if the�-do not relate to envuonmental issues or the adequac5-of the EIR. Master Response#3: Mitigation Nexus Pursuant to CEQA Gz�idelines Section 15126.4, a mitigation measure must be"roughly proportionaP' to the impacts of the project,��hich means that the proposed project is required to pa5-its fair share of the cost to mitigate an impact that is caused b�-other projects in addition to the proposed project. Several comments suggest mitigation measures that a�e not directl�-related to and��ould not mitigate a significant project impact. For eiample, a homeless transition facilit�-��ould not be��a�ranted as a mitigation measure because the project«ould not result in impacts that«ould be reduced b�-the homeless transition facilit�-. Simila�ly,mitigation targeting a specif�ic population (e.g., students and seniors)that is not significantl�-adversel�-affected b5-project impacts is not«a�ranted. Master Response#4: Nitrogen Deposition According to the Santa Cla�a Valle�-Habitat Plan, atmospheric nitrogen,including atmospheric nitrogen generated b�-motor vehicle emissions,is thought to function as an effective fertilizer in nutrient-poor soils, such as serpentine soils in the Ba�-Area. The buildup of nitrogen over time is thought to facilitate the invasion and persistence of non-native species that ma�-out-compete native species in nutrient-poor plant communities. Several comments suggest that the vehicle trips generated b�-the proposed project��ould malce a significant contribution to the cumulative impact of nitrogen deposition in the Ba�-Area on nutrient-poor soil communities,including serpentine soil communities (��hich ha�bor protected species such as the Ba�-checkerspot butterfly). In acldition, several comments suggest that Apple should be requued to pa5-a Nitrogen Deposition Fee, as requued b5-member agencies of the Santa Cla�a Valle�-Habitat Plan. No Si�nif�icant Impact Due to Nitro e� n Deposition. The project��ould not malce a signif�icant contribution to the cumulative impact of nitrogen deposition on serpentine habitat or the Ba�- checicerspot butterfl�-for t��o lce�-reasons. Although the project��ould increase the number of regional vehicle trips,these trips��ould occur at a distance fa�removed from the locations of serpentine soils. The project site is located in the midst of an urbanized area,fa�from established clusters of serpentine grasslands (e.g.,in the Coast Range or habitat south of San Jose). In Appendii E of the Santa Clara Valle�-Habitat Plan(Estimation of Contributions to Deposition of Nitrogen in Santa Clara Count�-for the Santa Cla�a Valle�-Habitat Plan),the simulations for nitrogen deposition in serpentine habitats for the Ba�-checicerspot butteifl�- indicate that almost one-third (30 percent)of the nitrogen deposition derives from mobile emission sources in the vicinit�-of the habitat areas, 13 percent of the nitrogen deposition comes from other P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 14 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES sources��ithin about 12 miles of the habitat a�eas, and 17 percent of the deposition comes from the remainder of Santa Clara Count�-. The complete brealcdo«n of simulated nitrogen deposition sources is sho��n in Figure E-27 of Appendii E of the Habitat Plan. The project site is located over 20 miles from the center of serpentine and Ba�-checicerspot habitat areas in the Ba�-Area. In addition, as sho«n in Table V.GS,Projected Housing Demand b�-Cit�-Based on Residential Location of Current Apple Employees, on page 227 of the Draft EIR,the vast majority of Apple employees��ould live in places at a distance from serpentine habitat. Therefore,the project��ould not malce a significant contribution to the cumulative impact of nitrogen deposition in serpentine a�eas,including those ��ithin the Habitat Plan bounda�ies. In addition, as eiplained on page 134 of the Draft EIR, as part of the project Apple��ould voluntaril�- pa5-$126,381, an amount equivalent to the Nitrogen Deposition Fee that a project generating 35,106 net ne�� dail�-trips��ould pay if it��ould result in significant impacts related to nitrogen deposition. In that case,the pa5-ment��ould constitute full mitigation of the impact. Ho��ever, because the proposed project is not located��ithin the bounda�ies of the Santa Cla�a Valle�-Habitat Plan,��hich established such a fee for its member agencies,and«ould not create a significant impact due to nitrogen deposition,the pa5-ment by Apple«ould be voluntai�-. This amount«ould be paid to the Implementing EntitS-of the Habitat Plan, and is eipected to be used to protect and enhance sensitive habitat in the region that is subject to degradation due to nitrogen deposition. Thus, even if the contribution of nitrogen from project vehicle trips«ere considered cumulativel�-considerable,the payment of this amount��ould ensure that such an impact��ould be less than significant. Santa Clara Valle�-Habitat Plan A�licabilit�. As stated in the Habitat Plan, "The purpose of this Plan is to protect and enhance ecological diversit�-and function in the greater portion of Santa Cla�a County,��hile allo��ing appropriate and compatible gro��th and development in accordance��ith applicable la��s."The Habitat Plan,therefore,is designed not on1�-to protect and enhance sensitive habitats and species«ithin the Habitat Plan a�ea, but also to facilitate development(roads,urban gro��th, and other infrastructure)identified b�-the Habitat Plan pa�ticipants. The Cit�-of Cupertino is not a Habitat Plan pa�-ticipant and does not receive an�-of the benefits that come��ith participation, including talce authorization for listed species associated«ith covered activities and projects, or streamlining of permitting processes. Because the project site is located outside the Habitat Plan bounda�ies and is not covered b�-the Habitat Plan, as described above,the project applicant is not required to pa5-Habitat Plan development fees,including the Nitrogen Deposition Fee. Ho��ever, as discussed above, Apple has voluntarily agreed to pay,in full, an amount equivalent to the Nitrogen Deposition Fee that the project��ould ha�e had to pa5-had there been significant impacts due to nitrogen deposition. Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site Retaining Pruneridge Avenue as a public right-of-��a�-��as incorporated into a project altemative (the Pruneridge Avenue altemative),��hich is anal�-zed on pages 605 to 612 of the Draft EIR. As discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR,t��o additional altematives allo��ing for public access across the site (a Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative and a Mobilit�-and Pa�lc altemative)«ere rejected for detailed anal�-sis because the�-«ould inteifere«ith major utility lines,«ould infringe on private propert5-,result in aclverse visual impacts,incur significant costs and/or��ould still pose significant securit�-concems to Apple (thus conflicting��ith a lce5-project objective). P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 15 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Apple maintains that any-public access provided��ithin the project site��ould compromise its privac5- and securit�-objectives. One of Apple's fundamental project objectives in developing the project is to consolidate Apple emplo5-ees in a single secure location to ensure privac5-and to promote sha�ed creativit�-and collaboration and spur invention. The project's landscaped area, ancillai}-spaces, and buildings��ould also serve to promote interaction among colleagues. The on1�-��a�-that the outside and ancillai}-spaces can pla5-this role is if the�-a�e as secure as the main building. Providing building-by-building security in place of maintaining a secured perimeter«ould not provide the level of securit�-Apple desires and thus��ould conflict��ith a primai}-project objective. Master Response#6: Project Trip Distribution Some commenters suggested that the anticipated distribution of project trips on the road��a�-net��orlc should ha�e been determined using altemative methods,including methods that«ould ha�e distributed more trips in the immediate vicinit�-of the project site and on sui7ounding local and Count�-road«a�- facilities. The trip distribution pattern for the ne« vehicle trips added to the roacl«a�-s�-stem b�-the project is based on the residence locations of cui7ent Apple employees at other Cupertino sites. The assumption is that emplo5-ees at the project site��ould have simila�cha�acteristics and therefore simila�residence location preferences. This is a reasonable assumption because: (i)man�-of the emplo5-ees at the project site��ould be cui7ent Apple employees and (ii)the close proiimity of the project to cui7ent Apple facilities in Cupertino malces it reasonable to assume that ne�� emplo5-ees��ould malce similar choices about��here the�-live. This method of using more localized and specific data(i.e., employee addresses)to evaluate trip distribution provides a more precise means of anal�-sis than is typical in transportation impact analyses,��hich typically rely on general land use/travel pattems. Rely-ing on general land use/travel pattems and models ma�-be the approach more conventionall�- talcen in transportation anal�-ses because it is unusual to ha�e fine-grained employee location data of the lcind provided b�-Apple. Ho��ever,the use of such data for eiisting and lilcel�-future employees allo��s for a more precise transportation anal�-sis that better accounts for the eipected commute trips of employees. This employee location data allo��s for a more precise anal�-sis, because unlilce the general land use/travel pattern data produced b�-organizations such as the Association of Ba�-Area Governments (ABAG) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC),the employee location data in this case is derived from actual Apple emplo5-ees��ho are lilcel�-to ha�e tra�el habits similar to future Apple emplo5-ees��orlcing on the project site. The impact analysis in the Draft EIR employs a cautious approach in other��a�-s. The transportation anal�-sis in the Draft EIR assumes that all project traffic��ould be ne�� traf£ic added to the road��a�- s�-stem. Ho��ever, some of the traffic generated b�-the project��ould originate from eiisting homes in the area. It is also lilcel�-that some future emplo5-ees currentl�-reside in the a�ea but��orlc else��here and therefore—as pa�t of the proj ect—��ould modifi-a portion of theu commute trips and��ould not generate completely ne�� trips on the road��a�-s�-stem. In acldition, employees may purchase or rent eiisting homes in the a�ea, in��hich case the�-��ould replace trips generated b�-cui7ent residents of those homes. Traffic from approved and pending residential developments«ere aclded to the Background and Cumulative scenario traffic projections. Traf£ic generated b�-employees residing in those developments is therefore accounted for t��ice in the anal�-sis. This approach of using actual P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 16 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES emplo5-ee location data ensures that the traf£ic anal�-sis is as accurate as possible,��hile not under- estimating potential impacts on the road��a�-net��orlc. Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic Several residential streets in the cities of Santa Cla�a and Sunn�,-vale a�e situated near the project site. The Draft EIR evaluates potential impacts on some of the most direct cut-tluough streets in the residential neighborhoods adjacent to the project site,including Quail Avenue, Ma�ion Way, and Inverness Wav in Sunn�,-vale and Hillsdale Avenue and De Soto Avenue in Santa Cla�a. Several comments submitted on the Draft EIR eipressed concem about the use of additional residential streets as cut-through routes. Streets cited in the comments a�e Dunford WaS-(lcno��n as Marion Wa�- ��est of Oriole Avenue), Lochinvar Avenue, S��allo�� Drive,Peacocic Avenue,Nightingale Avenue, Teal Drive, Lillicic Drive,Halford Avenue,Henderson Avenue, and Norman Drive, all of��hich a�e ��ithin the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale. The cut-tluough analysis conducted for the Draft EIR focuses on potential cut-through traffic during the AM pealc hour,��hen the volume of project trips��ould be the highest. The anal�-sis concluded that(i)given the small number of project trips coming from El Camino Real(drivers most lilcel�-to use cut-through routes in Sunn�,vale��ould come from El Camino Real) and (ii)the inferiorit�-of many-potential cut-through routes to the main a�-terials and collectors (in terms of speed of tra�el or convenience),the impact due to project-related cut-tluough traffic��ould be less than significant. This finding��ould apply-to all residential streets in the vicinit�- of the project site,not just the most lilcel�-cut-through routes considered in the Draft EIR anal�-sis. Please refer to pages 430 to 432 of the Draft EIR for additional discussion. The cut-through traffic evaluation in the Draft EIR focuses on the addition of potential cut-through traffic from the project and not the diversion of non-project related traf£ic in the area due to increased congestion. Ho«ever, the intersection level of service anal�-sis indicates that the intersections around the project site��ould operate at acceptable standa�ds and therefore it is not anticipated that traffic«ould divert into the neighborhood to bypass congestion. See page 431 of the Draft EIR for further details. Although the anal�-sis in the Draft EIR sho��s that there��i11 not be a signif�icant impact due to cut- through traffic,the Cit�-acicno��ledges that cut-through traffic is of concem to local residents. Therefore,as a Condition of Approval,the Cit�-��ould require Apple to set aside funds ($500,000 for the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale and $250,000 for the Cit�-of Santa Cla�a)to monitor cut-tluough traffic and potentiall�-install traffic calming measures should cut-through traffic-related problems a�ise due to implementation of the proposed project. The Cit�-of Cupertino��ould��orlc��ith the appropriate jurisdictions to determine the eitent of the neighborhood cut-through traffic and to ensure that neighborhood concems a�e addressed. Therefore,impacts related to cut-through traf£ic (including on the additional residential streets identified in comments on the Draft EIR)��ould be less-than- significant. Master Response#8: Adequacy of Transportation Demand Management(TDM) Penalties The Cit�-has established TDM penalties that��ould be assessed if the project eiceeds the trip count of 4,270 AM pealc-hour vehicle trips and 4,400 PM pealc-hour vehicle trips. The TDM penalties a�e discussed on pages 445 to 446 of the Draft EIR The penalties��ould be assessed evei�-da�-until trip count conformance is achieved, and a�e intended to ensure compliance��ith Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b. The fee��ould be$5/da�-/trip if Apple does not implement aclditional TDM measures determined in consultation��ith Cit�-staff(see page 443 of the Draft EIR for these additional P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 17 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES measures) and $3/da�-/trip if aclditional TDM measures a�e implemented. (These penalties«ould be acljusted based on the Consumer Price Indei.) As an eiample,if the trip counts are eiceeded b�-200 vehicles in the AM pealc hour and 200 vehicles in the PM pealc hour, and Apple does not agree to implement CitS--approved TDM measures,the penalt5-��ould be $2,000 per da5-. Due to the monitoring schedule described on pages 444 to 447 of the Draft EIR,it��ould lilcel�-talce 6 months before conformance could be measured and confirmed. Therefore,the total penalt5-��ould be $260,000 (26��eelcs i 5��orlcing da5-s a��eelc i$2,000 a da5-) for 6 months of this hypothetical eiceedance scena�io. Such penalties are robust compa�ed to other similar TDM-related penalties assessed throughout the Ba�-Area and a�e considered suff�icient to ensure compliance��ith the pealc trip counts goal established in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b. Master Response#9: Monitoring TDM Program Ultimate authorit�-for monitoring Apple's TDM Program��ould reside��ith the Cit�-. As discussed on pages 444 through 447 of the Draft EIR, Apple��ould be responsible for the collection of initial TDM-related data(identification and description of the specif�ic TDM measures being implemented, and estimates of AM and PM pealc hour vehicle trips and vehicle trips per emplo5-ee)in accordance ��ith measurement guidance and monitoring guidelines created b�-Apple and the Cit�-. Ho��ever,the effectiveness of Apple's TDM Program��ould ultimatel�-be verified��ith the collection of additional data (including daily-,hourly, and 15-minute traffic counts talcen at project dri�e�va�-s and/or pa�lcing facilities over specified 2-«eelc periods)to be undertalcen b�-an independent CitS--approved planning/ engineering firm. This firm,under the duection of the City, could request aclditional data from Apple, or reject the initial data collected b�-Apple (and substitute a different data set). Therefore,prima��- responsibilit�-for monitoring the efficac�-of Apple's TDM program��ould reside��ith the Cit�-.No conflict��ould eiist bet��een the TDM Monitoring Report(prepared b5-an independent firm) and the initial data collected b�-Apple because the Apple-collected data could be used at the discretion of the independent firm preparing the TDM Monitoring Report. Apple��ould pa5-for the cost to conduct monitoring and CitS-staff time to revie�� the annual monitoring reports. The appropriate entit�-for the oversight of the monitoring program and malcing findings of compli- ance or non-compliance is the Cit�-of Cupertino. Because the Cit�-is the CEQA leacl agenc5-and has jurisdiction over land use decisions«ithin its borders,it is the coi7ect entit�-to aclminister this program and to ensure that this mitigation measure is implemented and macle enforceable. Oversight b�-another entity, such as the Santa Clara Valle�-Transportation Authorit5-(VTA),is not appropriate or required. Master Response#10: Median on East Homestead Road As described on page 102 of the Draft EIR,the proposed project includes the option of a landscaped median on East Homestead Roacl bet��een North Wolfe Roacl and North Tantau Avenue. The purpose of the median is to provide additional landscaping along the northem edge of the project site as both a beautification measure and to act as a visual buffer to adjacent residences. The median is not a requuement nor is it a mitigation measure for the project. Both the cities of Cupertino and Sunn�-vale sha�e jurisdiction of this segment of East Homestead Road. Given the shared jurisdiction, both agencies��ould need to approve the final design of the median; therefore Apple��ould continue to ��orlc��ith both cities to finalize the design of the median. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1 g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES The final design��ould continue to provide local access (ingress and/or egress)to Nightingale Avenue and Peacocic Avenue. Ho«ever,if the landscaped median is approved, duect eastbound access to/from homes on the north side of East Homesteacl Roacl«ould be limited and residents of the a�ea��ould be required to malce U-tums at designated gaps��ithin the median(at Nightingale Avenue, Peacocic Avenue, and other streets if provided). The limitations on eastbound access«ould prima�ily- affect the 22 homes bet��een Nightingale Avenue and Peacock Avenue, and sii homes bet��een Peacocic Avenue and Quail Avenue. These homes��ould generate the follo��ing AM and PM pealc hour trips: Table RTC-1: Tri s Generated b Select Residences North of East Homestead Road Between Ni�htin�ale A�-enue Between Peacock A�-enue and Peacock A�-enue and Quail A�-enue Number of homes 22 6 AM eali hour tri s(total) 26 1� Inbound (AM eali hour hi s) 7 � Outbound(AM eali hour tri s) 19 hiahest 10 PM eali hour hi s(total) 27 9 Inbound (PM eali hour tri s) 17 6 Outbound(PM eali hour hi s) 10 3 Source: Fehr&Peers.2013. Thus the greatest number of U-tums that��ould occur at a given median gap is 19 vehicles for the AM pealc hour for outbound trips��est of Peacocic Avenue,��hich��ould not substantiall�-degrade the operations of East Homestead Road. In Sunn�,-vale's and Cupertino's revie�� of the proposed median, design considerations such as the abilit�-to malce U-turns,provision of eastbound left-tum pocicets,eastbound refuge lanes, and other design elements«ould be evaluated to minimize the accessibilit�-impacts to residents on the north side of East Homestead Roacl. As noted above,ultimatel�-both local agencies«ould need to approve the final design of the median project. Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure With the closure of Pruneridge Avenue,vehicles cui7entl�-tra�eling on this road��a�-bet��een North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue«ould detour a�ound the project site. The maiimum detour path along North Wolfe Road, East Homestead Roacl and North Tantau Avenue is approiimatel�- 1.1 miles in length and represents a 0.6-mile detour(1.1 mile ne�� path minus 0.5 mile eiisting path). There are generally three types of trips that��ould be affected b�-the proposed closure: L Through trips��ith no destination on Pruneridge Avenue bet��een North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue that«ould be diverted a�ound the project site; 2. Vehicles cui7entl�-accessing the project site that«ould be diverted to the ne« drive«a�-s on North Wolfe Roacl and North Tantau Avenue; and 3. Trips associated��ith The Hamptons apartment communit�-. As discussed on page 430 of the Draft EIR,tra�elers to/from The Hamptons that��ould be significantl�-affected b�-the project a�e on1�-those that cui7entl�-tra�el to/from the east on Pruneridge Avenue. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES For the second type—vehicles cui7entl�-accessing the project site—it is assumed that their destination «ould remain the same and,therefore,the�-a�e not considered "diverted"trips. To estimate the number of affected vehicles for each of the three trip types, Fehr&Peers conducted origin and destination (OD) surve�-s'in August 2011 at the intersections of North Wolfe Roacl/Pruneridge Avenue and North Tantau Avenue/Pruneridge Avenue. Fehr&Peers also collected trip counts at The Hamptons drive��a�-in November 2011 to determine the trip generation and distribution cha�acteris- tics of the apa�tment complei so that the number of apa�-tment trips to/from the east could be measured. The OD surve�-results (see RTC Table 2)«ere used to determine the percentage of vehicles that tra�el on Pruneridge Avenue as through traffic versus those that access the eiisting office uses on Pruneridge Avenue, and therefore«ould not be diverted. Table RTC-2: Distribution of Tri s on Prunerid e Avenue AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Destination % Number of Vehicles % Number of Vehicles Pruneridae Tluouah Traffic 65% (1,050) 50% (700) P�oject Site 27% (�25) �3% (600) The Ham tons 8% (1�0) 7% (100) Total 100% (1,615) 100% (1,�00) Source: Fehr&Peers.2013. The tluough trips on Pruneridge Avenue«ere assumed to divert to both East Homestead Road and Vallco Parlc��a�-to/from North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue to tra�el to their ultimate destination. Eiisting intersection turning movement distributions (i.e.,the percent of vehicles that tum left/right or tra�el straight)��ere used to malce assumptions about the number of vehicles diverted to East Homesteacl Roacl or Vallco Parlc��a�-and their ultimate path of travel to/from North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue. The Hamptons trips coming from/tra�eling to the east��ere assumed to divert to East Homesteacl Road and North Wolfe Road via the Wolfe Roacl/Pruneridge Avenue intersection. Based on the numbers of vehicle trips eipected to be diverted due to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue and the relativel�-short diversion distance (0.6 mile),the closure of Pruneridge Avenue��ould not result in significant effects on vehicular travel behavior(although signif�icant impacts«ould occur to bic�-clists and pedestrians, as discussed in the Draft EIR). Master Response#12: Trip Cap As described on page 441 of the Draft EIR,the Cit�-evaluated the feasibilit�-of a mitigation measure requiring a"trip cap."Under a trip cap, once development of the project site generates trip volumes that eiceed AM and PM pealc-hour values for triggering impacts to the transportation s�-stem, continued development and gro«-th at the project site«ould be halted. A trip cap«as rejected as infeasible because it��ould conflict��ith a lce5-project objective of consolidating Apple's engineering and support personnel in one location. In addition, such a trip cap��ould limit employment gro��th on the site,«hich«ould be undesirable to Apple and the Cit�-for economic reasons and«ould conflict ��ith a key project objective of developing a campus that can accommodate 14,200 employees. i Origin-Destination stuvevs can be used to estimate the amount of through h-af�ic in a particular area.Thev involve recording the license plates of vehicles at the entr-ances and e�its�uid matching the plates to determine the nuinber�uid percentage of vehicles tr-aversuig the�uea. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 2� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Instead, "pealc trip counts"are established as goals for full implementation of the TDM measures for the project(used to reduce phy-sical impacts on the transportation s�-stem), as such counts��ould reduce project traffic��hile also allo��ing for planned gro��th��ithin the site. "Pealc trip counts"a�oid the negative consequences of"trip caps," such as limiting the abilit�-of Apple to achieve its objectives of consolidating research and development teams into one location at the site,��hile also providing an effective mechanism for ensuring that Apple effectivel�-implements the TDM Program. Master Response#13: Calabazas Creek Trail Several comments suggest that a trail should be developed through the project site, along Calabazas Creelc. Such atrail is sho��n in General Plan Figure 2-I and��ould promote��allcabilit�-and the use of altemative modes of transport in the vicinit�-of the project site. As discussed on pages 152 to 155 of the Draft EIR,the project��ould not fu11�-implement this proposed trail segment and Strategies 2 and 3 of Polic�-2-73 of the Land Use/Communit�-Design Element,��hich encourage the implementation of trail projects (and require dedications or easements for trails,��here appropriate). Ho��ever, as discussed on page 152 of the Draft EIR,the General Plan allo��s fleiibilit�-in the implementation of trail projects,including the balancing of safet5-,privac5-, and securit�-concems in identi�-ing a specific trail alignment. Requuing Apple to construct a Calabazas Creelc trail through the project site as mitigation for Impact PLAN-2«as determined to be infeasible because Apple has indicated that the fundamental objective of a secure campus«ould be compromised«ith the provision of a public trail immediatel�-acljacent to or tluough the project site. Even��ith securit�-and design measures such as fencing, Apple maintains that such a trail through a portion of the site��ould pose securit�-rislcs because Apple has been the target of intense scrutin�-regarding its future projects. Given that Apple's resea�ch and development facilit�-is to be located at this site,perimeter securit�-that��ill afford privac5-is a fundamental objective. Please refer to Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site for aclditional discussion of these securit�-considerations,including the relationship of these securit�- concems��ith key project objectives. In acldition, development of a trail along Calabazas Creelc through the project site��ould be phy-sically- constrained. The ripa�ian corridor��ithin the site terminates at a culvert under I-280. If a trail through the site��ere provided,it��ould either terminate at the I-280 culvert or��ould require a crossing over or under I-280. A connection under I-280��ould be a potentiall�-costl�-engineering solution or��ould on1�-be operable during the di�-season. The cost of a connection over I-280«ould be significantl�- higher and��ould be disproportionate to the impact of the project on planned trail facilities,malcing it an infeasible measure. Because a public trail through the project site��ould be infeasible due to securit�-reasons and phy-sical planning constraints,the Draft EIR identif�ies an altemate,feasible mitigation measure to further the implementation of the Cit�-'s trail-related planning policies. Mitigation Measure PLAN-3, described on pages 154 to 155 of the Draft EIR,��ould require aesthetic and functional improvements along an altemate creelc trail,pa�-t of��hich��ould be acljacent to the bounda�ies of the project site. This altemate creek trail��ould eitend from the intersection of North Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue, south to the intersection of Vallco Pa�lc��a�-and the creek. The required improvements��ould include signage,plantings that reference Calabazas Creelc,pedestrian-scaled lighting,rest areas or P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 21 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES picnic tables,pavement features that reference the creek and/or��ater, and decorative fencing and gua�d rails. In addition, Mitigation Measure PLAN-3��ould require that Apple fund a stud�-of a Class I trail along the drainage channel and Calabazas Creelc channel south of the project site. The Cit�- could then pursue development of that trail, based on the findings of the stud�-. While Mitigation Measure PLAN-3��ould pa�-tially-mitigate the loss of the segment of the planned Calabazas Creelc trail,the measure��ould provide substitute trail facilities and alignments that��ould be less desirable to trail users. Therefore,the impact«ould remain significant and unavoidable, as discussed in the Draft EIR. A project altemative,the Mobilit�-and Pa�lc altemative,��as initiall�-considered as part of the project altematives anal�-sis, as discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR This altemative��ould include a trail that��ould eitend along Calabazas Creelc through the project site, and��ould ultimatel�-connect North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue. Ho��ever,this alternative��as rejected because it��ould pose significant securit�-concems to Apple and��ould conflict��ith a lce5-project objective. Master Response#14: New Freeway Ramps Several comments suggest that the project include the creation of ne�� I-280 ramps that��ould allo�� direct access to and eiit from the project site. The creation of ne�� I-280 ramps seiving the project site ��as not proposed as pa�t of the project and��as rejected as a mitigation measure because: 1)ne�� ramps on the free��a�-��ould not significantl�-reduce the impacts of the project; 2) such a change is not under the jurisdiction of the Cit�-of Cupertino; 3)ne�� ramps could eiacerbate congestion on I- 280 and compromise the lce�-securit�-objective of the project; 4)ne�� ramps��ould violate Caltrans regulations related to the proiimit5-of free�va�-interchanges (including High��a5-Design Manual, Chapter 500, Section 501.3,��hich requires interchanges to be at least 1 mile apa�t in urban a�eas) and 5) a ne�� ramp directly-to the site��ould violate Caltrans regulations prohibiting direct access to private propert5-from free��a5-s (High��a5-Design Manual Topic 104.1). Master Response#15: School Busing Program Several comments suggest that the Cit�-require Apple to implement a ne�� school busing program to reduce traf£ic impacts associated��ith the project. Requiring Apple to bus children to school as mitigation for project-related traffic impacts��as rejected from detailed consideration in the Draft EIR for the follo��ing reasons: • School trips in the area are generally-understood to have a distribution pattern that differs from those associated��ith the project. Thus the reduction of school trips ma5-not substantiall�-reduce the impacts of the project on the road��a�-net��orlc. • The implementation of a school busing program��ould not on1�-be difficult and costl�-to develop and aclminister, but there also«ould not be a neius bet«een the project's impact on the road«a�-net«orlc and the benefit that«ould be achieved b�-implementing a school busing s5-stem. See also Master Response#3: Mitigation Neius. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 22 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES A. STATE, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL AGENCIES P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L ZJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER Al City of Sunnyvale Kent Steffens,Director of Public Works July 22,2013 Response A1-L This comment comprises the transmittal conve5-ing the comment letter from the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale, along��ith an introduction to the content of the letter. This comment is noted. Response A1-2: This comment introduces the subsequent comments and notes previous collaboration��ith the Cit�-of Cupertino on project-related planning issues. Response A1-3: The information in Table III-2,including the identif�ied building heights of the Phase 2 development,is coi7ect. Figure III-4 on page 67 of the Draft EIR is revised as sho��n on the follo��ing page. Response A1-4: As described on page 125 of the Draft EIR,the Corporate Fitness Center ��ould be acljacent to a 25-space parlcing lot. Parlcing in this lot��ould not be restricted to Corporate Fitness Center employees or seivice vehicles. On a dai1�-basis, Apple emplo5-ees«ould be directed to parlc in the Main Building Parlcing Garage,Main Parlcing Structure,North Tantau Parlcing Structure, and Phase 2 pa�lcing areas. Therefore,no change to the teit of the Draft EIR is «a�ranted. Response A1-5: As described on page 59 of the Draft EIR,under eiisting conditions,the perimeter of the project site is patrolled b�-Apple personnel on a 24-hour basis. Securit5-personnel also monitor other pa�ts of the project site. This securit5-protocol��ould continue��ith implementation of the proposed project and��ould ensure that the landscaping along the perimeter of the site��ould not ha�bor criminal activit�-. In addition, as pa�t of the project, Apple��ould utilize camera suiveillance along the perimeter fence that��ould be monitored at a centrall�--located campus operations center. Response A1-6: The Corporate Fitness Center��ould primarily-be used b�-emplo5-ees��ithin the project site, and other,off-site fitness centers��ould remain a�ailable to employees at off-site Apple facilities. Because the Corporate Fitness Center ��ould be an eas�-��alk(approiimatel�-5 minutes,via intemal path��a5-s)from the Main Building,the vast majorit5-of emplo5-ees��ould not be eipected to use transit to access the facilit��. Ho��ever,transit access to the Corporate Fitness Center«ould be a�ailable on an on-demand basis for those employees ��ho prefer not to��allc to the facilit�-. The shuttles seiving the Corporate Fitness Center��ould be the 15-seat Sprinter vans that Apple cui7entl�-uses to shuttle emplo5-ees bet��een buildings at eiisting Apple facilities. These vans ��ould picic-up and drop-off passengers at the pa�lcing lot adjacent to the P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 24 � � � � � rd � .� �--� a� w o � � � � � •� � > � � .�c-:"{ :. � -�'j°-- --__ ' :.� ��i - - _ �-��-'il� 41,. � � � bA � �aJ�.. i ' �. T �� .l � " ",� ,�t �' `.J '� w ��,,:� �„� --� '�Y; - �, ., .� � � � !�`� �t' - �.�j� - -- �f' Y "; �"• :�`� �, .a, � I I: _ "�,'�_ �„�. � -, � � �� ' 14 � I � - � --n � : � ��i' ' '«. o � ' i�.� —4 �: �• �" f:.1 .,: , �, :�;- � ,� :i '`yw' _ � �'I,i.� _ _ 9w � � _ � � : ' ]i �±�:� � p.., �; �fih��-c.�F��, �';'. � [�l�'�''{~��'�:i:e� � .i.. �.-`•- .:�'q�" ' r. '�. .� � I. .py y ��• ''�i�Y1E._I A i. � � .�...... • � �►: # �7* 2�,�.:+re�.' wr�!-�+�yJ{�-a �SC_ �. -C2' � .r�, c� •-,4�r�: .ti�_ ��+T �� •ti �.- 1: � -�fV �Y l � f��":,'.f��.-'ayy^f:j-� . . �., � � �� _ ._ _�. _�,�,:, ,, �- , �,;�;r- r+!:. � �.�..,� ,��. a' � � •�I_ - �` f '!. `*� .� :"3•':'� 1•�� - .� .��Y. asf�� r_ y�� 5':y��. ' �-.�• _..� �y�� y ' �� S�� f�' i�M ��_ R i[ii� �. �.�_>" � "� ■.. '�1:. � 2. 1 ' • r�� F�$ A• T -;� ..�. • ( �� e � { ,j ^�� .� �_J';� �-�t�`-.` p � r �� =F��[n �6' .'"i ..r�::"�j ��n�{'�; a ; :. ..,.� -- '�� c� ` �`-�L � �•i: S�" �. rwa-,r .. �?�'+i �WS' �_ y1.'�• ,�� ll ,�P:��. 'r7 •-�-�...• 0 � .. s:r^.c �..ir '�. .�� _��'� _�7... N _ ,°�" ��-� '.�. . _ � ,.�: .3 �� ;:� ',� � ��• .:�1 ��:R.. 7r.. $ I i� � r �r 'W -�� -.� -s:� '�1 � �' n�t L{ � �� f 'F �s � �lr-.• � �e�, 1,� ;� i� � �� :, � � i�Rw, I � - .� '� - - -�` a � .��.� 'r 4 _� � "'�. '�1 _�. . ,�T . ,I��• . �� 'd�� , � 'S � -.�� :-�-7 ��' .�� '� '1�� .:�c k. k M1 ��;i�`5�� ' � �alcx- � 4�. I�� ` ''I .r; �'.� _ �� , : *�• :_:_eR�. [:,_�._s �t�.� �.t�}ir�`��yl_�' ��•`:�••'-s �' . • . �-$srr:w.rr•a.nrs. '�,�„�s�r:�'� � "�.� ,� •,asd��'.s.s.�na�� 4[ �'.. i tl�� /��r�� '�I ,4�I '�^`� ��_p:��C��- +��-�„� .--_'--��:x�C��- � % nF P� �'f/e ��'+ "� �'�N's'�� •.� �� ;+��' �� . � .��. � ' �`� � ��;ar `�rr`�- �' �;p��.`•�k;%r �+y : ?}�'� � '.�' �,,�e.: •.5, .:� :b?!�:� ��' .�Y - �k ��'a`:'•..�'�: �� - n�l. ��c �r �� . •�. 1. �'�� '`� � �� ^-�`r 1� ��yy.i�.� �:•':��r`t�' �r�,.� [_�,+. � � ��, ' � i `� �'i� R�'• - r�`�._�� .. � •:. �y. � ' f :�: _�•- r� 3 '� �� ., ;�,��`��,��:` "� �� _ � � .: r s;,� � .��►. �'. ' '� �' �. +�� x . .�. , �. �; _ �. � r�-�� ,� :��`;;`'�r"!:,:r �e�,' , ��' �' �` �;�' ^::an.�'F� �l' • "��• , Z�,, ,:�`;e:� ` . .,�y:�:- �-'�u. � �.�'� .� �'A � - 4T�� k �'� �_ F��.1 /� �'� ��s 4'� ::Y' . Ti ,r;.t'• Y./,". ♦ii 'i ,�`. a'� . r . +� . r �i'n �F • .'!�'L��y, ' �T'�. i. � i T�_'�'i � �� '.� -�.�•,�x��i�r" 4 M,':.. _ � �� ,. _ )l' �� ,� F .!�� •y{� ' , �¢^ � .r r}� �k�� -. ?� .. ��s: - �'{�- .:{�r l R+�{;�i�� .�� A Iti�?�'" +.� +�� . - -i '.[� � � . . '�}:�� { '.'.i� "�,�F ' n� yt -`:� :/ � ;`��: �.R�".- 4f � 4 ��{~3f� irT�. � • t�' -'`:H�'-'?''� ��] I :� + � �p�i�� .: ti-.a�"�f;h�� { � •�,4�`, -� .7r"'_� . �r+c .I � - � Ni �' `�� . ✓ ' � :�•. � 1 •I' �{�- I��. �� ` �.., � f�;��. ' �■ • _ ! ��. ! 1 '_'9` r�r' ±�'r..°�� 1;�i. �,�" '� _�x, � _f -� � � 1�" �. �.�, a ..�� I � ' _�.. �*� �.` `'� � g�`'o i .,.. i :f `..__ `�i� �.�,^ �+�� - �� .�ti � Y� t -- r. T��• '•' ��i • - ;;�� . '��,., � 3va - '�+�-�-r.�.r,.r,�� r ^ -� � � ��....Y.� •- -_� ^ -ix. � r:�'.��1l1�►^�►Ilt � ;� , � '� _'�::. . �+�, + �� 's. �.��s: ',�+�� y��;%l �� .� � l� ��Sa� � •�-y dr.a?� .��.�,` ` � a �'� ' _ " `F� . � �,. �d� �%; •.a � 's�"'�-��'R �-�'� .1. �'��:':.t; ' •r"d t�h��^�-r -�� E� ��-'+x�.. �� •� � •' ��_ , � 1 � � � =� �ki.�.il� �,. .. �•�.14: r ' �� - o .i � I y .�5� � -� � I`�' -' _ _ _ - - ° ° - - ° ° ° - °� ..i� F- �. {� ,r> � _- - - - - - - - - 1� { 96 � � �� Z'• m'i h c M M � M � M M M � � 7 �m 1 - � y� S 1,�� J 'r�' g ' , , _ , _ 'O �i -q _ ..,�,. -�: k� +�' � :�L�_r yt" 3 r m ¢ � n n � a u� u� u, ¢ � v' � z a o S z � , ��-'� �� - ,:� - -- _ _ - - z z z z � � ti .=��y'r' '�: y' / � . .'� w � � M � ' M � � � � ' � � � _� � r e i� - - - - - - - - - ~ S �1� � ;' z z z °q1 •~ Z .. ��.�' �� * '-�- •�: _ '!'[ N Q ¢ ¢ 4 ¢ 4 ¢ 4 4 4 ¢ ¢ ¢ � .�� `.� y�-�� :. 'i z � z z � z M z M � � z z z w � �-':r,'-°- ��' ��.� � - - � _ n a � -- — w••i• �. � ��'� - m d a � �? � ° � i `•� . . . J " d. - tt •'�;�' . ,. , .� t� � �� ' �;r-' - .� . 3�•:�, , � i a = N = _ °� � = �a N �� s �� q .,�" �- m a = a > - - - - _ �,; � �� =��t � =r, ��'� � v � � r-; � .��x��;'=�-�- f'� -r � _ - _ ¢ a - _ � � o � �- �° � � - y za � � zz - a � a - N � :�� .=,��• , . .. :�! �,�� t � .��=�=r ,�� o w � � ,, � a � � � � o 0 o w M U � �+J W � Q J W ° � o w � � LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Corporate Fitness Center. Because the on-demand vans��ould not offer a significant tra�el time sa�ings (and in man�-cases«ould be less convenient than��allcing),the use of these vans to access the Corporate Fitness Center is eipected to be negligible,and the vans«ould not add a substantial amount of traffic to East Homestead Road. Response A1-7: Please see Response to Comment A1-4. Response A1-8: As described on page 208 of the Draft EIR,the vie��point locations selected for preparation of project visual simulations "��ere selected based on project site visibilit�-and the locations that provide the most representative vie��s of the project site."These vie��point locations are not intended to be ezhaustive of all the vie��s surrounding the project site that could be altered��ith implementation of the proposed project. Rather,the locations a�e intended to illustrate the��a�-s in��hich vie��sheds ma�-change due to the project. Simila�ly,the preparation of a visual simulation for evei�-vie��point that ma�- be subject to change��ith implementation of the proposed project is not required to evaluate the impacts of the project on vie��s. Vie��points 4, 5, and 6, as sho��n on Figure V.B-1, a�e representative of vie��points to the north of the project site. The coi7esponding visual simulations on Figures V.B-5 through V.B-7 sho�� that the buildings on the project site��ould be la�gely- obscured b5-proposed perimeter landscaping. Although the visual simulations in the Draft EIR are aclequate to meet CEQA's information disclosure requirement, an additional simulation (from the intersection of East Homesteacl Road and Peacock Avenue)has been prepared in response to this comment, as sho��n in Figure RTG1. Simila�to the eiisting visual simulations,this additional simulation indicates that the buildings on the project site«ould be largely-obscured b5-proposed perimeter landscaping. Response A1-9: The Lighting Technical Report� ��as prepa�ed for the project and��as used to evaluate project impacts on light and gla�e in the Draft EIR The model used in the Lighting Technical Report to evaluate project-related light and gla�e did not include trees or other landscape features that could obscure light,in order to anal�-ze a��orst-case light/gla�e scena�io. As described on page 215 of the Draft EIR, even using this��orst-case modeling scena�io,the project��ould not eiceed the light spillover thresholds established b�-the llluminating Engineering Society of North America. At three of the eight identif�ied i Arup,2012.App7e C'arixpzrs 2 ProjectE�n�iro�rrixe�rta7lrixpactReportLighti�rg Tech�rica7Report.October 29. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 26 �- ,�>�- `, � . � .'•t:� . ti;:.,rfi`F-5 :ay.��,'-'y,�= ._ -...•. _ �ti'.v.Y.}l.��• Y}.-'�y��' . '_ � vr... � --.. ' • ..� �'k:�;S �� 4 „`: .� ... ... A�`� 'y y�:�. �Cj'�' . ,r��"�. �. . . � �� r.�/y �,r . � „.. ; ,�� , ;�`T�- � r �#� +r��,�. .r,'. 1 ._ '.1!ti-��-�'f'_.'1�.,. ,� ,.,, }_'1�'; l rk.. . ��a;-_ ''�.� i_ �: �`�' .� � e,-: .•�:3' °� � � ��A7' � �r'. . i .��.s .. . .�.x:�w-��'�-�!� ,�;, �z`��;�'�• . �-� -.�+ Y': � -��2:��.. - r 4 �` s�"- - � �"��+�; - ..�rr,. ,. .. �.�.�.� _ � : � , „, �.� , �`. '�`Y .,±;�_��- `�.r, ..� �,.�,�,i.,f�':� w ,,� -��dcs. �. `�, y, . .. �: . T�., ��;}. ��,: �, -s ;'�: _ � �.' 4:� � � _ . . '.�.,: y}...r I�. . _• �' Y � . . y . . f•' �1��1 . � ' •- 'yti �� .� - �_ - • • _ — � �r '�•" ` _i •�� +'i.� . �4' ��. . {L. . -�,�'. '� ••��r . .. � +-_k'. '�T. �1'i''- ° _ _ 5 - .: .,_.' . ,�F . . _ .. �- . �.�'�- s �' � - v�: r;�� ',r. _ �v - +} � - - '� - + *��' f. ' �,�rs�4��. �. - - . .�-- - __ __- _ �4 •,k.,� ` � ��-#�_ - � �� E�isting vie�� of the prc�ject site ��if ��~,K', ti • fi � � �4 .�fi .�' �$ �y�c�� .�. V�"'8�i„ .�: s��Y ��b_ . M'("'r' f�E �r,�� . --. ��-L t'y " al+^�+ �e��M1�„ 3 ..,3 1. Y �^'., �y� -�,I �� A � gy �.( .'�.'�� .�� -�r J�; -- � i �b' �,• 1� -F�'W ��'�J� ,�� 5 . .�:tFf �'.1 �k �" . 'l -... ;� , ��,�,"1�✓A .��. �3 4��,'.- � y��t� �� S��Ys'Y4�� ! . ,�h{�, t '�� e'4�r:, �i T' � Ft � p� '�i �g� � y* _ Y` i, t , r ,� � i�� '�, ��i1F -�.- � » � ��. " { �� 4 ,�� c ,-� `� � ��` ��. '�� f "�� a x� F �'� �'��,� �" � �� •4ti% �y'�-}' � _ � t �y. ��p��L �l� S 1 � .:5. � � �� . R_ S T i'� , i,.,.�--+- `�', �� C� • ,�:�fA:',� .. 1� : I� I I ' I I i, . p ��f .•i I g � � ' c,' ak Il��r ,ti.. �_6�� iC�' .. � r + " ��W�,. 4 � j� � rl ` '�`� � �.,� � �' � � LT. � � _ � , { y sr - n 'S'� � f ',.+,� �-,:;y W!�.F 'q-",;Tr Ldi..'� � . .. . � _ �"�k _ ,Zt'e �� St •.�� FIj�„ �.,�_ .. . . _ . . . ' . - .. �.- -. . Visual simulation of the proposed project L S !\ FIGURE RTC-1 A��le Gram�us 2 Project EIR Visual Simulation: Looking South between Nightingale Avenue and souxeE:aYYLE.zo13. Peacock Avenue on East Homestead Road I'�,COC1101 appleCampu52 RTC`,Figures`,Fig_RTC-l.incicl O 1�;13) LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES receptor locations light spillover��ould be reduced��ith implementation of the project(due to the substitution of��ide1�--dispersed lighting in suiface pa�lcing lots��ith updated,focused lighting, and other factors). The lighting values reported for the project on Table V.B-1 on page 215 of the Draft EIR «ould lilcel�-be reduced further if proposed vegetation and landscape features a�e talcen into account. Therefore, aclditional measures to reduce light spillover,including the planting of la�ger trees,��ould not be��ai7anted. Response A1-10: This comment requests potential transportation improvements that eiceed those required b5-project impacts. The transportation anal�-sis in the Draft EIR does not identi�-project impacts on the Homestead Road coi7idor nor at the De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Roacl/I-280 interchange complei. Because the project��ould result in less-than-significant impacts at the locations identif�ied above,the improvements identified in the comment a�e not requued. TRAFFIX is the approved LOS transportation soft��a�e adopted b�-all local jurisdictions«ithin Santa Cla�a County,including Cupertino and Sunn�,-vale. TRAFFIX��as used to identif�-impacts to local streets. Response A1-11: As part of the project, bilce lanes��ould be eitended/enhanced on North Wolfe Road from East Homesteacl Road to Vallco Pa�lc��a�-. There is an eiisting bilce lane gap on North Wolfe Road for approiimatel�-350 feet north of East Homesteacl Road. This is an eiisting condition in the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale and the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale is best positioned to implement improvements to its bic�-cle facilit�-net��orlc. Response A1-12: A signif�icant impact related to project effects on the bic�-cle net��ork bic�-cle ��as not identified at this location, so mitigation is not requued. The defi- cienc�-in bilce facilities described in the comment is an eiisting condition in the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale and the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale is best positioned to implement improvements to its bic�-cle facilit�-net��orlc. The Cit�-of Cupertino��ould support such improvements. Response A1-13: The transportation impact analysis used to prepa�e Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR��as conducted in conformance��ith CEQA requirements b�-using the appropriate anal�-sis scenarios,locations, and methods and b5-apply-ing appropriate significance criteria to identifi-impacts and mitigation measures. The stud�-«as conducted according to the requirements of the Cit�-of Cupertino,the Santa Cla�a VTA, and CEQA. Response A1-14: VTA's Transportation Impact Anal�-sis Guidelines (Ma�ch 2009)indicate that intersections��here the project adds more than 10 trips per lane should be considered for evaluation;ho��ever,it is ultimatel�-the decision of the leacl agency to select intersections for evaluation. The five suggested intersections��ere not originally-selected for evaluation, since the�-: 1) ma�ginally-meet the 10 trip per lane rule and 2) a�e signalized minor street intersections that provide local access/cuculation,located along a coi7idor that does not ha�e eiisting operational deficiencies. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 2 g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Intersection tuming movement counts are not a�ailable for all five intersections for��hich aclditional studies��ere requested. Data��ere a�ailable for the the Sunn�,-vale-Sa�atoga Avenue intersections at Che�-enne Drive-Connema�a Wa�-and Alberta Avenue-Ha�l�icic WaS-(both Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale intersections)and the La��rence Eipress��ayBenton Avenue intersection(Count�-of Santa Clara). Anal�-sis has been completed for these intersections and is presented belo«. The latest a�ailable intersection turning movement volume data for the t��o Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale intersections are from October 2012. The Cit�-of Santa Clara provided counts for the La��rence Eipress��ay/ Benton Avenue intersection from Ma�-2012,��hich��ere used to anal�-ze operations. The LOS results for the t��o aclditional Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale intersections and one additional Citv/Countv of Santa Cla�a intersection using TRAFFIX anal�-sis soft��are under the Eiisting,Bacicground, and Cumulative plus Project scena�ios are summarized in Table RTC-3. The results sho�� that all three intersections��ould operate at acceptable service levels and no mitigation measures a�e required. Table RTC-3: Levels of Service for Re uested Intersections Plus Pro'ect Conditions Peak Existing Background Cumulative Intersection Houri Jurisdiction Dela�� LOS Dela�� LOS Dela�� LOS Sunn��a1�Saratoga AM 9.� A 9.7 A 10.2 B Ave/C hevenne Dr- �,M Sunnvvale �6 A 8.1 A 8.4 A C'oimemara W� Sunn��a1�Saratoga AM 16.� B 17.� B 18.4 B- Ave/Alberta Av� pM Sunnvvale 17.6 B 19.2 B- 203 C+ Hai1�ic1.W� La�vrence E�press�va��/ AM Counn�of 40.9 D �3.8 D- �6.1 E+ Benton Ave PM Santa Clara 3�.9 D+ 43.8 D 46.0 D Notes: ' A1��1=moi7iing penk hour,P1��1=nftei7ioon pe:il.hotir. Deln�=Whole intersection��eighted nvernge control dela� eipreaaed in aeconds per vehicle. LOS=Level of Service Bold indicntes iuincceptnble intersection operntions.Bold and highlighted indicntes si�iificnnt impncts. Soiuce:Fel�r&Peers,Au�ist 2013. Intersection tuming movement volume counts��ere not a�ailable for the intersections of East Homesteacl Roacl/Blue Ja�-Drive and East Homesteacl Road/Heron Avenue. These intersections a�e��ithin the jurisdiction of the Cit�-of Cupertino and a�e signalized minor intersections that intersect��ith local streets that ha�e a limited amount of neighborhood traffic. In response to this comment, Fehr&Peers conducted phy-sical obseivations of these t��o intersections on September 10, 2013, since intersection tuming movement volumes��ere not available, and determined that in their professional judgment the intersections currently-operate at acceptable levels. Further,the addition of through traffic on East Homestead Road due to the project is not anticipated to substantiall�-deteriorate operations. In addition,the level of seivice analvsis at the intersections of East Homesteacl Roacl/North Wolfe Road, East Homestead Road/Blane�-Avenue and East Homestead Road/ P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 2g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Sunn�,-vale-Sa�atoga Road do not sho�� an�-impacts in the east-��est duection, further indicating that the level of seivice for the minor intersections at Blue Ja�-Drive and Heron Avenue along this coi7idor«ould not degrade to unacceptable levels. For these reasons,the Cit�-of Cupertino determined that a more detailed stud�-«ould not�-ield meaningful information or different conclusions,and thus it elected not to further evaluate these intersections. Therefore,the project's impacts to the East Homestead Roacl/Blue Ja�-Drive and East Homestead Road/Heron Avenue intersections«ould be less than significant. Response A1-15: Please see Master Response#6: Project Trip Distribution. As sho��n on Figure C-2 in the Appendii to the Transportation Impact Anal�-sis,the anal�-sis included project traffic added to Wolfe Road north of Fremont Avenue. It��as assumed that emplo5-ees living in the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale at closer proiimit5-to the site��ould either move into eiisting homes and replace trips generated b�-the current residents (and not add ne« traffic) or move into ne« homes included in Bacicground and Cumulative projections. Response A1-16: VTA's Transportation Impact Anal�-sis Guidelines (Ma�ch 2009)includes guidance on the appropriate data sources for eiisting conditions, but does not require that eiisting conditions represent conditions present at the time of the most recent CMP monitoring. Eiisting conditions��ere established in Ma�- 2011��hen the majorit5-of the data collection and intersection counts��ere conducted for the anal�-sis. These Ma�-2011 data approiimate conditions that eiisted��hen the Notice of Prepa�ation(NOP)for the Draft EIR��as published in August 201 L This approach is also consistent��ith recent CEQA case la��,��hich has confirmed that the baseline normall�-constitutes physical conditions as the�-eiist on the date the Notice of Preparation is published. Response A1-17: The intersections of Sunn�,-vale-Sa�atoga Road/Homestead Road and Sunn�,-vale-Sa�atoga Roacl/Homesteacl Avenue��ere correctl�-evaluated as ha�ing sii through lanes on Sunn�,-vale-Saratoga Road. Response A1-18: The impact to pedestrian access at the I-280/Wolfe Roacl interchange is identif�ied as Impact TRANS-29. Mitigation Measure TRANS-29 requires the provision of enhanced cross��alks at that location. Additional pedestrian traffic generated b�-the proj ect��ould not create a proj ect impact that��ould require mitigation at other free��a�-ramps in the area. Response A1-19: Page 359 ofthe Draft EIR is modif�ied as follo��s: Near the project site, bic�-cle lanes (Class II) a�e provided on Pruneridge Avenue,Homesteacl Roacl,Wolfe Roacl, Tantau Avenue, Vallco Pa�lc��ay, and Stevens Creek Boulevard. There is a disconti- nuit�-in the Class II facilit�-along Wolfe Roacl at the I-280 over- crossing. A Class III bilce route eiists on Tantau Avenue south of Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d to Bamha�t Avenue. There is a discontinu- P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L J� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES itv in the Miller Avenue bilce lane bet��een Stevens Creek Boulevard and Calle De Ba�celona. Additionally, bic�-cle facilities do not eiist on Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d east of Cronin Drive. Furthermore,the bilce lanes on Homesteacl Road are shared��ith pa�lcin�lanes at the follo«in�locations: 1)«estbound bet«een Ni�htin�ale Avenue and Ni�htha��lc Terrace and 2)��estbound from the intersection��ith Tantau Avenue for a�proiimatel�-350 feet. At these locations, pa�lcing is prohibited Monda�-throu h� Fridav from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., durin��hich time the lanes a�e used for bilces and ri h� t-turn vehicles. The remainder of the time the lanes primaril�-function as pa�lcin�lanes, althou�h bicvclists can continue to use them��hen cars are not pa�lced in them. Bic�-cle facilities comprising bicycle lanes (Class II) and bic�-cle routes (Class III) connect the Apple Campus 2 site to the La��rence Caltrain station. Continuous bic�-cle lanes connect the Apple Campus 2 site to Apple's Infinite Loop campus via Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard, both of ��hich have high traffic volumes and speeds,��hich generally-discourage bicvclists. Response A1-20: Figure V.I-3 on page 361 of the Draft EIR is updated as sho��n on the follo��ing page. Response A1-2L This comment is noted. Each intersection is numbered and coi7elated bacic to the indei map included on the same figure.No change is proposed as adding intersection locations«ould acld clutter to an alreacl�-bus5-graphic. Response A1-22: Per VTA Transportation Impact Anal�-sis Guidelines,transit facilities, including bus stops,��ithin approiimately 2,500 feet of the project site are sho��n in Figure V.I-5 of the Draft EIR The intersection of El Camino Real/Wolfe Road,��hile a major transfer point,is outside of this zone and therefore is not sho��n on the figure. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L J 1 � � , � �� Q Reed Ave Monroe�St � � Y m ^ � � � ( � �m --� a � a � Remington Dr i x w �v Q � � w v � � — � J H IC Fremont Ave EI Camino Real v� � v � r> � ¢ � T m I I� � � � � � �I � R � � Y� Benton St v cc ---- m � o �n � ¢ _ � R o � > � ( � R >/�� C � Ir � I � Homestead Rd a � � � F ' _ � m a 0 � C � _l — Pruneridge Ave lll � � / J � �� :� I i Stevens Creek Blvd �f � - — � — � � � � McClellan Rd ¢ MoorparkAve T ` R I m L �� Bollinger Rd � � � � � � m Williams Rd m � � � l ' ' � ¢ I ¢' Q ( — � v o 5 v � °1 r poyle Rd � `n � � ° - \ Rainbow Dr � Payne Ave ri � � � � �. � � �� v I a I � Prospect Rd �a'�� Hamilton Ave LEGEND � �'a � City of Cupertino ° � � Project Site � �, j Campbell Ave Existing Bicycle Facilities Coz Ave � � Class I Bike Path �ec�e�a � � Class II Bike Lane e � � C K Class III Bike Route � LL — C 3 McCoy Ave e Planned Bicycle Facitlities a � � ��• Class II Bike Lane � _ � � �°�ro=��E L S `\ FIGURE V.I-3 [Revised] � NoTTO saALE A��le Cam�us 2 Project EIR souxcE: FExx��EExs.auc.usTZOi�. Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities I'�,COC 1101 apple Campus 2 RTC`,Figures`,Fig_�;I3[Re�isecl]ai (8;1�'2013) LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response A1-23: Page 368 ofthe Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Most commuting bic5-clists tra�el at a rate of about nine to 10 miles per hour,meaning the La��rence, Sunn�,-vale, and Santa Cla�a Caltrain stations a�e located about an 18, 23, and 28-minute bic�-cle ride a��a�-from Apple Campus 2,respectively-. Only the La��rence Caltrain station has continuous bic�-cle infrastructure that connects it to Apple Campus 2 in the form of Class II lanes along Wolfe Road (on all se�ments eicept bet��een old San Francisco Road and Fremont Avenue), Reed Avenue, and Aster Avenue. Response A1-24: The Cit�-of Cupertino does not have a Cit�--��ide traffic-forecasting model. Discussions��ere held��ith VTA staff��hen the anal�-sis for the Draft EIR ��as initiated to determine��hether the VTA model��as the appropriate tool to develop traffic projections for Cumulative Conditions. VTA staff noted that the project is relativel�-small��hen compa�ed to overall employment in the region, and��ould fall under the categoiy of"short-term"development as defined��ithin the VTA Traffic Impact Anal�-sis Guidelines because the project«ould be built and occupied«ithin 5 �-ea�s. The use of a transportation model is not typically-recommended b�-VTA for projects of this scale. Therefore,in consultation��ith VTA,the Cit�-confirmed that aclding traffic projections from approved and pending development«ould be the recommended approach to developing cumulative traffic projections. Response A1-25: Please see Response to Comment A1-24. The Cit�-of Cupertino is essentiall�- built out according to its aclopted General Plan (2005-2020). While the Cit�- is currentl�-contemplating updates to its General Plan, that process is in the earliest stages and it��ould be speculative to estimate the amount of gro��th that could occur prior to acloption of the updated plan. As a result,the cumulative scena�io used in the Draft EIR is appropriate and no revisions a�e necessai�-. Additionally,it is anticipated that the project«ould be constructed��ithin a 48-month time period starting early-2014. Therefore, construction is eipected to be complete��e11 before the cumulative horizon �-ea�(2020) studied in the Draft EIR. As eiplained on page 376 of the Draft EIR,the cumulative anal�-sis��as based on a list of projects anticipated to be constructed in the neighboring jurisdictions b�-the cumulative horizon�-ea� (2020). Furthermore,the project falls under the categoi}-of"short-term" development as defined��ithin the VTA Traffic Impact Anal�-sis Guidelines because the project«ould be built and occupied«ithin 5 �-ea�s. Pursuant to the Guidelines the appropriate projection methods for cumulative conditions ha�e been applied. Response A1-26: The comment indicates that the project conflicts��ith Sunn�,-vale's Bilce Capital Improvement Program rega�ding bilce lanes at North Wolfe Road/East Homestead Road. The comment does not specifi-the conflict, although it is noted that the Bilce Capital Improvement Program sets forth a final lavout for each a�terial and collector street in Sunn�,-vale and identifies improvements needed to implement the desired la�-out. Because the project P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L j j LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ��ould not preclude the construction of bilce lanes at the intersection of North Wolfe Road and East Homestead Road,the project��ould not conflict��ith this element of the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale Bilce Capital Improvement Program. Response A1-27: The CitS-agrees that policies and plans in adjacent cities should be talcen into consideration in developing pedestrian and bic�-cle impact criteria. Ho«ever, CEQA does not require an anal�-sis of a project's consistenc�-��ith all studies conducted b�-neighboring jurisdictions, as is suggested b5-the comment. To the contra��-, CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(d)requires an anal�-sis of inconsistencies��ith"applicable"plans,including,among others,the air qualit5-attainment or maintenance plan or State Implementation Plan, a�ea- ��ide��aste treatment and��ater quality control plans,regional transportation plans,regional housing allocation plans, and habitat conservation plans. For that reason,it is not necessai�-to assess��hether the project is inconsistent «ith the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale's Pedestrian Safet�-and Opportunities Stud�-and the Comprehensive School Traffic Stud�-.Nonetheless,the noted studies and plans«ere revie«ed and it is noted that the project«ould construct and enhance pedestrian and bic�-cle facilities in the vicinit�-of the project site and «ould not preclude construction of any-planned facilities in adjacent cities, including those identified in the studies. Therefore,the project��ould not conflict«ith specific pedestrian and bic�-cle projects in acljacent cities and further evaluation is not��a�7anted. Response A1-28: Please see Response to Comment A1-27. Response A1-29: The transit impact criteria used in the Draft EIR��ere revie��ed b�-VTA. The consistenc�-of the project��ith VTA's Comprehensive Operations Anal�-sis Criteria is acldressed on pages 426 and 427 of the Draft EIR; see in particular Impact TRANS-30 and its associated mitigation measure. The project��ould provide enhancements and amenities to transit stops on road«a�-s in the project site vicinit�-and��ould be generally consistent��ith the Comprehen- sive Operations Anal�-sis Criteria. Response A1-30: Traffic tuming left into the project site from the north on North Wolfe Road comprises traff�ic approaching the site from the north on North Wolfe Road and from the east and«est on East Homestead Roacl. The projected left-tum volume during the AM pealc hour is greater than 350 vehicles,thus requuing t��o left-turn lanes. Response A1-3L The northbound right-tum volume is projected to be over 1,100 vehicles during the AM pealc hour,thus requiring t��o right-tum lanes. A bilce lane ��ould be provided for c�-clists. The impact of the dual right-tum lanes on pedestrian conditions��as identif�ied as Impact TRANS-28 in the Draft EIR. The mitigation measure includes installation of a"Yield to Peds" sign that is activated b�-a pedestrian push button and a high visibilit�-cross��alk(i.e., ��ith laclder striping) at the east leg of the Wolfe Roacl/Project Access intersection to help malce the cross��allc more prominent. It is also recom- mended in the Draft EIR that the Cit�-consider the provision of a leacling P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L J4 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES bic�-cle and pedestrian interval(although this is not pa�t of a mitigation measure). Response A1-32: Please see Master Response#10: Median on East Homestead Road. Response A1-33: The public bus stops to be enhanced b�-the project sponsor��ould be designed to the appropriate VTA standards,as directed b�-the VTA. Response A1-34: The list on page 386 of the Draft EIR includes the transportation infrastructure improvements that a�e proposed as part of the project. This is an eiisting condition in the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale and the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale is best positioned to implement improvements to its bic�-cle facilit�-net��orlc. The project applicant is not proposing to provide colored bilce lanes on Wolfe Road at the parlcing transitions bet��een El Camino Real,Homestead Road, or complete the bilce lane gap on Wolfe Road/Homestead Roacl, so these items are appropriately not included on the list of proposed transportation improvements. All enhanced bilce lanes��ithin the Cit�-of Cupertino's jurisdiction��ill be maintained b�-the Cit�-. Response A1-35: Please see Master Response#10: Median on East Homestead Road. Response A1-36: Please see Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure. Response A1-37: This comment requests potential transportation improvements that eiceed those required b5-project impacts. The transportation anal�-sis in the Draft EIR does not identi�-project impacts at the De Anza Boulevard/I-280 interchange complei. Because the project��ould result in less-than- significant impacts at the locations identified above,the improvements identif�ied in the comment a�e not requued. Please also see Master Response #3: Mitigation Nezus. Response A1-38: Table V.I-14 in the Draft EIR sho��s that tra�el time for vehicles tra�eling south on North Wolfe Roacl��ould be 97 hours of total vehicle dela�-��ith a t��o left-turn lane project eiit configuration, compared to 141 hours for a three left-turn lane configuration. This translates into 101 seconds of dela�- per vehicle��ith a t��o-lane project eiit and 146 seconds of delay per vehicle for a three-lane project eiit, a difference of 45 seconds of delay per vehicle. These results a�e based on a VISSIM analvsis conducted for the North Wolfe Road coi7idor,��hich reflects the movement of individual vehicles on the road��a�-s�-stem and the effects of vehicles��ea�ing,merging, and queuing bet��een intersections. The Cit�-is conf�ident this anal�-sis reflects the best a�ailable means of understanding the impacts of the va�ious project entrance/eiit configurations on traf£ic along the North Wolfe Road coi7idor. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L JS LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response A1-39: The discussion for Impact TRANS-34 refers to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue and impacts on residents at The Hamptons;ho��ever,the comment refers to the evaluation of potential traffic aclded to neighborhood streets. The general assessment in the Draft EIR is that the neighborhood cut-through routes are inferior to the main travel routes because the�-are less direct,ha�e multiple stop signs, and lo��er posted speed limits. Please see Master Response: Neighborhood cut-through traffic for additional discussion on this topic. Response A1-40: Development of the project��ould occur in accordance��ith all elements of the project description as defined in Chapter III of the Draft EIR(Project Description). As described on pages 128 to 129 on the Draft EIR, Apple anticipates that three to four special events��ould held per y-ea�,��ith a maiimum of approiimately 1,000 guests (including approiimatel�-350 non- Apple employee guests). The event management plan described is suff�icient to evaluate associated impacts, and Cit�-staff retains the abilit�-to monitor activities, as needed, subject to cost recovei�-. The Conditional Use Permit for the auditorium use«ould restrict events for invited guests, but«ould not restrict events for cui7ent Apple employees. Response A1-41: As discussed on pages 432 to 437 of the Draft EIR,the proposed project ��ould provide adequate on-site parlcing (��ith implementation of Mitigation Measure TRANS-35),thus limiting the demand for off-site pa�lcing. The measures to address any spillover pa�lcing include implementation of additional TDM measures and,if required,the provision of additional pa�lcing. As pa�-t of the conditions of approval (and as specified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program),the project sponsor��ould fund monitoring to assess��hether spillover pa�lcing occurs. The implementa- tion of permit parlcing is one of the possible measures listed on pages 435 to 436 of the Draft EIR that could be pursued if spillover pa�lcing occurs. This measure«ould be subject to the responsibilit5-and jurisdiction of the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale, but Apple has agreed to coordinate and collaborate«ith Sunn�,-vale and to contribute funding that could be used to implement the measure. Response A1-42: Please see Master Response#10: Median on East Homesteacl Road. The Cit�- of Cupertino��ould��orlc��ith the Cit�-of Sunn�-vale to determine the ultimate design of the median,including the length and design of the «estbound left-tum lane from East Homestead Road to southbound North Wolfe Road. The final design��ould seek to eitend the left-tum lanes as far as possible,��ithout eliminating pa�lcing on the north side of East Homesteacl Road. Therefore, ca�e«ould be talcen to ensure that pa�lcing«ould not be eliminated along this section of East Homestead Road. Response A1-43: Please see Master Response#9: Monitoring TDM Program. Response A1-44: Noise from all on-site mechanical equipment,including that associated��ith the air intalce equipment proposed in the northem quaclrant of the project site P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L J6 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES (and other heating-ventilation-cooling-and au conditioning (HVAC) equipment),has been anal�-zed and discussed on pages 465 and 466 of the Draft EIR. As described in that anal�-sis,due to the distance of the proposed facilities from off-site sensitive receptors,noise from the operation of au intalce mechanical equipment that��ould be located in the northem quadrant of the project site«ould attenuate to belo« background ambient noise levels (��hich a�e dominated,in the location of the air intalce equipment referenced in the comment, by traffic noise on East Homesteacl Road)as measured at receiving sensitive land uses. Therefore, as project-related mechanical equipment stationa��-noise sources«ould not eiceed eiisting ambient noise levels at receiving sensitive land uses (66.5 A-«eighted decibels (dBA) CNEL associated��ith eiisting traffic on East Homesteacl Roacl, as measured at 50 feet from the outermost tra�el lane),impacts of inechanical equipment on the noise environment«ould be considered less than significant, and no mitigation«ould be required. Response A1-45: This concluding comment is noted. Please see the previous responses on the anal�-ses requested by the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale. COMMENTER A2 Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Kenneth R. Schreiber,Interim Executive Officer July 9,2013 Response A2-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response A2-2: The CitS-agrees��ith the statement that"even relativel�-small amounts of nitrogen could contribute to a cumulativel�-signif�icant impact b5-diminishing the population sizes of serpentine species and possibly-the chances of suivival of the threatened [Ba�-checkerspot] butterfl�-and the serpentine- specific plant species."This concept is described more eitensivel�-in the attachment to Letter A2 (Califomia Department of Fish and Game, 2012. ,StNeamliningMitigation foNlmpacts to Biological Resoz�NCes.November 13.). Ho��ever, as described in Master Response#4: Nitrogen Deposition,the contribution of the vehicle trips generated b�-the project to this cumulative impact��ould not be considerable. Furthermore, Apple��ould voluntarily-pa5- $126,381, an amount equivalent to the Nitrogen Deposition Fee,had nitrogen deposition been identified as a significant impact in the Draft EIR(no such impact��as identif�ied). Thus, even if the contribution of nitrogen from project vehicle trips«ere considered cumulativel�-considerable,the payment of this amount��ould ensure that such an impact��ould be less-than- significant. Refer to Master Response#4: Nitrogen Deposition for additional detail. Response A2-3: This comment,��hich indicates that pa5-ment of an amount equivalent to the Nitrogen Deposition Fee b�-Apple to the Santa Cla�a Valle�-Habitat AgencS- ��ould be appreciated,is noted. Ho��ever,the Cit�-rejects the request that the P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L j7 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES pa5-ment of this amount be identified as mitigation for a"cumulativel�- significant environmental impact."As described in Master Response#4: Nitrogen Deposition,the project��ould not malce a significant contribution to the cumulative impact because: 1)the project location and most project trips «ould be located at a distance from nutrient-poor soils most affected b�- nitrogen deposition and 2) Apple, as part of the project,��ould voluntaril�- pa5-an amount, equivalent to the Nitrogen Deposition Fee aclopted in the Habitat Plan, eipected to be used to protect and enhance sensitive habitat in the region that is subject to degraclation due to nitrogen deposition. Ho��ever, the CitS-agrees that if a significant impact��ere identified,pa5-ment of the Nitrogen Deposition Fee��ould be appropriate mitigation. Response A2-4: This comment,��hich does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. The Cit�-��ill consider the need to evaluate the effects of nitrogen deposition due to development projects«ithin its jurisdiction based on the size,location,trip distribution, and other pertinent cha�acteristics of proposed projects in Cupertino. Response A2-5: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER A3 County of Santa Clara,Roads and Airports Department Michael Murdter,Director July 22,2013 Response A3-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response A3-2: This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response A3-3: Please see Master Response#1: Significant and Unavoidable Impacts. Response A3-4: The left-tum queue on the northbound approach of the intersection of Saratoga Avenue and La��rence Eipress��a5-currentl�-eitends the length of the left-tum pocicet during the AM pealc hour under eiisting conditions. Because the project��ould add traffic to this movement, Santa Clara Count�- requests that the project add a second left-tum lane or eitend the left-tum pocket. Significant project impacts��ere not identified at this intersection because it is projected to operate at acceptable LOS E+under Bacicground plus Project conditions during the AM pealc period. Ho��ever, Apple and Cupertino ha�e agreed to coordinate and collaborate«ith Santa Cla�a Count�-on operational issues,��here feasible. Although the addition of project traffic to the left-tum queue��ould not be considered a phy-sical environmental impact,the Cit�-of Cupertino��ould require a fair share contribution to this eiisting operational issue as a Condition of Approval,in order to improve eiisting operations. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L j g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER A4 State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Erik Alm,District Branch Chief July 22,2013 Response A4-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response A4-2: This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response A4-3: Please see Master Response#6: Project Trip Distribution. Project traffic using SR 85 north of I-280��ould come from/go to areas along SR 85 and along US 101 north of the US 101/SR 85 interchange, such as Mountain Vie�� and Palo Alto. The route comprising La��rence Eipress��a5-and US 101 is not a faster altemative for those destinations and«ould not be attractive to project traffic. Therefore,the trip distribution pattern and trip assignment is coi7ect and no change is��a�ranted. Response A4-4: Queuing is generally-not considered a phy-sical environmental impact in and of itself, based on the Cit�-'s criteria of significance. The one eiception to this is��hen eicessive off-ramp queuing eitends onto the free��a�-mainline and causes a hazardous condition. Such conditions«ould not occur«ith implementation of the project at the northbound I-280/La��rence Eipress��a5-/Stevens Creelc off-ramp or at the southbound I-280/Stevens Creelc Boulevard off-ramp.Nevertheless, at the request of the commenter, aclditional anal�-sis«as conducted to respond to the comment and evaluate considerations related to queuing at the t��o off-ramps. The proposed project��ould acld the greatest amount of traf£ic to the ramps during the AM pealc hour. Therefore, supplemental operational anal�-sis of the off-ramps��as conducted and focuses on the Bacicground Plus Project AM pealc hour scenario. Table RTC-4 summa�izes the results,��hich a�e discussed in detail belo«. The northbound I-280/La��rence Eipress��a5-/Stevens Creelc off-ramp has a storage capacit5-of approiimatel�-430 feet on three lanes bet��een the Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d intersection and the junction��ith the northbound off-ramp,��ith an additional 1,300 feet of storage on the off-ramp itsel£ This results in a total storage capacit5-of 2,590 feet(430 feet i 3lanes+ 1,300 feet). Based on TRAFFIX,the a�erage queue for the northbound approach at the Stevens Creek Bouleva�d/I-280-La��rence Eipress��ay intersection is 30 vehicles under Background No Project Conditions,��hich��ould increase to 55 vehicles under the plus project scena�io. The northbound approach is assumed to have three lanes and TRAFFIX calculates the queue per lane; thus under the Background No Project scena�io the queue��ould be 2,250 feet(30 vehicles i 25 feet/vehicle i 3 lanes)and 4,125 feet(55 vehicles i 25 feet/vehicle i 3lanes)under the plus project scena�io. The project is eipected to increase the queue b5- 1,875 feet. With Mitigation Measure TRANS-10,«hich«ould acld an additional northbound lane (increasing P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L J9 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES storage to 3,020 feet(2,590 feet+430 feet lane)),intersection operation ��ould improve and reduce queuing to 31 vehicles per lane or 3,100 feet(31 vehicles/lane i 25 feet/vehicles i 4lanes). While queuing��ould slightly- eiceed the 3,020 feet of available storage,the ramp is fed from an auiiliai�- lane,meaning that the small amount of queuing be5-ond storage capacit5-(80 feet)��ould occur in the auiilia��-lane. This amount of queuing that on1�- minimall�-eiceeds storage capacit5-«ould not duectl�-blocic mainline lanes and«ould not create a haza�dous condition. The eipected AM pealc hour queue length can be accommodated at the southbound I-280 off ramp at La��rence Eipress��ay/Stevens Creek Bouleva�d and no further evaluation «as conducted. The southbound I-280/Stevens Creelc Boulevard off-ramp has a storage capacity of approiimatel�-400 feet in three lanes,plus 280 feet over t��o lanes, and 350 feet in a single lane. This results in a total storage capacit5-of 2,110 feet(400 feet i 3lanes+280 feet i 2lanes+350 feet i 1 lane). Based on TRAFFIX,the a�erage queue for the southbound approach at the Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d/I-280 Southbound Ramps is 13 vehicles under Bacicground No Project Conditions,��hich��ould increase to 16 vehicles under the plus project scena�io. TRAFFIX calculates the queue per lane;thus under the No Project scena�io the queue��ould be 975 feet(13 vehicles i 25 feet/vehicle i 3lanes)and 1,200 feet(16 vehicles i 25 feet/vehicle i 3 lanes)under the plus project scena�io. The project is eipected to increase the queue b5-275 feet. The eipected AM pealc hour queue length can be accommodated at the southbound I-280 off ramp at Stevens Creelc Boulevard and no further evaluation«as conducted. Table RTC-4: Back6round AM Off-Ram Queuin6(in feet) Available No Plus Off-Ram Storage Pro'ect Pro'ect Noithbound I-280/La��rence E�press��a�/ Stevens Creek(��ithout Mitigation Measure 2.�90 2.2�0 4.12� TRANS-10) Northbound I-280/La�vrence E�press�va��/Stevens 3.020 2.200 3.100 Creel.(�vith Miti�afion Measure TRANS-10) � � � Southbound I-280/Stevens Creek Boulevard 2.110 97� 1200 Source:Fehr&Peers,September 2013. Response A4-5: The list of Transportation Demand Management(TDM)measures referenced in this comment and found in the Transportation Impact Anal�-sis (TIA)��ere aclapted for inclusion in the Draft EIR(see pages 121 to 122). The comment that electric vehicle cha�ging spaces��ould not reduce vehicle trips is noted, but no additional cla�if�ication is needed. The Draft EIR notes at the bottom of page 122 that, although"electrical vehicles��ould not necessa�il�-reduce project vehicle trips,they��ould achieve other envuonmental benefits related to au qualit5-,noise, and greenhouse gas emissions." To the eitent that bilce sha�ing��ithin the project site could facilitate tra�el to the employee amenities on-site(including dining facilities and the Corporate P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 4� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Fitness Center), and reduce tra�el to simila�facilities off-site, bilce sha�ing could benefit off-site traf£ic levels. The bilce sharing program��ould be complementai�-to the shuttle program, allo��ing Apple employees to tra�el to and from��orlc��ithout a car,��hile retaining the abilit�-to tra�el short distances during the da5-, such as to other nearb�-Apple facilities or neighbor- ing retail establishments. Ezpanding the bilce sha�ing program��ould promote altemative means of commuting and is appropriately described as a TDM measure. As noted in the"Campus Walking/CS-cling Commutes"on page 121 of the Draft EIR,this measure includes: 1)provision of more convenient bic�-cle and pedestrian access to the Main Building; 2)provision of bilce locicers nea� the entrance to the Main Building; and 3)increasing the distance bet��een ��orlc space and pa�lcing a�eas,to malce pa�lcing less convenient. These features��ould encourage the use of altemate modes of transportation. As discussed on pages 440 through 447 of the Draft EIR, Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b��ould require Apple to achieve a 34 percent alternative mode pa�-ticipation rate, as verified��ith pealc trip counts at the buildout capacit5-of 14,200 emplo5-ees. The mitigation measure does not prescribe the use of the "Additional TDM Measures"described on page 443 of the Draft EIR unless the pealc trip count goal is not met. At that point, Apple��ould be required to implement some or all of the "Additional TDM Measures"until the pealc trip count goal is met. The mitigation measure is thus structured to ensure Apple meets its pealc trip count goal��ith the most efficient configuration of TDM measures (and is not contingent on the Cit�-selecting specif�ic TDM measures for Apple to implement). Reducing the project pa�lcing supply-ma5-cause pa�lcing in adjacent neighborhoods (a significant concem eipressed b�- residents��ho live nea�the project site) and therefore is not being considered for this project. Response A4-6: Ramp meters are used to manage free��a5-operations, by controlling the traffic demand at free��a�-enti�-ramps. The free�va5-operations anal�-sis conducted as pa�t of the Draft EIR is based on free��a�-densit�-and assumes that the project on-ramp demand«ould be accommodated on the free«a�-s�-stem. The resulting free��a5-impacts and mitigation measure a�e discussed in TRANS- 22. In addition,most of the ramp intersections requested for additional anal�-sis��ere evaluated in the Draft EIR The ramp intersections at Wolfe Road/I-280 northbound ramps,Wolfe Road/I-280 southbound ramps, La��rence Eipress��a5-/Southbound I-280 Ramps, De Anza Bouleva�d/SR 85 northbound ramps, and De Anza Bouleva�d/SR 85 southbound ramps«ere included in the anal�-sis. Most of these intersections��ere projected to operate at acceptable seivice levels or appropriate intersection LOS mitigation measures«ere identified. Queuing is generally-not considered a phy-sical environmental impact per the Cit�-'s criteria of significance, but rather an operational consideration. The one eiception is��hen queuing at off-ramps eitends onto the free��a�- P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 41 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES mainline and causes a hazardous condition. The comment references on- ramps, and so on1�-relates to operational issues and not envuonmental impacts. Ho��ever,the requested sii metered free��a�-on-ramps��ere revie«ed to determine if further operational anal�-sis should be conducted. The proposed project��ould add the greatest amount of traf£ic to the on- ramps during the PM pealc hour,��hen project traffic lea�es the site to access the surrounding free��a5-net��orlc. The revie�� focused on the on-ramps for the Bacicground plus Project PM pealc hour. Apple and the Cit�-��ould continue to��orlc��ith Caltrans to determine the operational queuing considerations for the southbound I-280 on-ramps at Wolfe Roacl (loop) and La��rence Eipress��a5-. In the PM pealc hour,the eiisting queues due to ramp-metering at the southbound La��rence Eipress��a5-on-ramp eitend the length ofthe on-ramp. Because the project «ould acld a considerable amount of traffic to this movement, Caltrans requests that the applicant provide additional storage for this free��a�-on- ramp b5-adding an HOV preferential lane. Although not a phy-sical environmental impact,the Cit�-of Cupertino��ould require a fau sha�e contribution to this eiisting operational issue as a Condition of Approval, since the acldition of project traf£ic��ould increase ramp queues. Neither the northbound I-280 on-ramps at Wolfe Road (diagonal)nor De Anza Bouleva�d (diagonal) ha�e ramp-metering during the PM pealc hour, ��hen the project��ould add the greatest amount of traf£ic;therefore,no aclditional operational anal�-sis��as considered for these t��o locations. The project��ould add 22 and 45 PM pealc hour trips to the northbound SR 85/ Homesteacl Road loop on-ramp and southbound SR 85/De Anza Boulevard on-ramp,respectively-. This is not considered a substantial amount of traffic, and therefore these t��o on-ramps on SR 85��ere not considered for further evaluation. Response A4-7: An�-construction��ithin the Caltrans right-of-��a�-associated��ith the project ��ould be conducted��ith the appropriate Caltrans permits and oversight. All Traffic Operations S�-stems and ramp metering equipment��ould be main- tained and«ould remain operational, as required b5-Caltrans or other agencies. Response A4-8: Apple��ould continue to��orlc��ith Caltrans and the Cit�-of Cupertino to develop the final design of the t��o off-ramps at the I-280/Wolfe Road interchange,��ith the goal of eitending the off-ramps to contain the eipected queues. The final design could include the suggestions identified in the comment. Ho��ever,there a�e right-of-��a�-constraints (especially-in the southbound direction)that limit the length of the off-ramps. Because of these constraints, and due to jurisdictional issues,the impacts to the northbound and southbound ramps (TRANS-25 and TRANS-26)��ere identified as significant and una�oidable. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 42 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response A4-9: Identified free«a�-impacts and mitigation measures a�e addressed under Impact TRANS-22, and discussed in Response A8-8. Proposed mitigation measures to free��a�-impacts include fair share contributions to: (1)the State Route 85 Eipress Lane Project(converting the eiisting HOV lane to a toll lane to allo�� single occupant vehicles to drive in the HOV lane for a fee); (2) improvements identified b�-Caltrans to eliminate an eiisting bottleneck on southbound I-280 bet��een El Monte Roacl and Magdalena Avenue; and (3) either the Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) stations proposed��ithin Cupertino, or an alternate improvement or stud�-to��ards the improvement of the I-280 corridor. The fau sha�e contribution amount��as calculated in consultation ��ith VTA staff based on the project's contribution to project gro��th on the affected free��a�-segment. Improvements on southbound I-280 bet��een El Monte Roacl and Magdalena Avenue«ere developed b5-the City in collaboration��ith VTA and Caltrans. Response A4-10: Cit�-of Cupertino staff ha�e discussed the fau-share formula��ith Caltrans and ha�e provided Caltrans��ith the corresponding calculations. Caltrans has eipressed that the�-a�e satisfied��ith the fair-sha�e contributions and the projects identified to receive the funding. Response A4-11: Please see Master Response#1: Significant and Unavoidable Impacts. The Cit�-��ould ensure that Apple pay the estimated cost of all mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR,including those associated��ith impacts that remain significant and unavoidable. As described in the Master Response, Apple��ould be requued to pursue the mitigation measures requiring action b�-other jurisdictions to the maiimum eitent feasible. The signif�icant and una�oidable finding does not allo« the leacl agency to a�oid identi�-ing feasible mitigation, but recognizes that Caltrans and other agencies ha�e not �-et granted the necessai}-approvals to implement these measures and the Cit�- of Cupertino cannot, at this time,gua�antee that such approvals��ould be granted. Apple has agreed to coordinate and collaborate«ith the eitra- jurisdictional agencies to construct each mitigation measure, or to provide funding to the agencies to design and construct either: (1)the identified mitigation measure or(2) an altemate improvement��hich mitigates the impact to the satisfaction of the Cit�-of Cupertino. Therefore,the Cit�-fu11�- eipects that the physical improvements identified in the noted mitigation measures«ould be successfull�-constructed and implemented and«ould require that Apple pursue these phy-sical improvements or fund the estimated cost of the identified improvements, as noted in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The on1�-circumstance in��hich the mitigation��ould not be implemented«ould be if Caltrans,or another responsible agenc5-, does not approve the improvements. Response A4-12: Please refer to Section V.B, Aesthetics, of the Draft EIR,for a complete disclosure of the aesthetics impacts of the proposed project,including visual simulations of the project from eight representative vie��points in the vicinit�- of the project site. As described in detail in Section V.B,the project«ould result in no significant aesthetics impacts. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 4J LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response A4-13: All sound��alls proposed as part of the project, as described on page 136 of the Draft EIR,��ould be built along— but��ithin—the bounda�ies of the proj ect site. Ho��ever,in the unlilcel�-event that sound��alls��ould need to be built��ithin a State right-of-��ay,an environmental assessment��ould be prepared. Response A4-14: This comment,��hich pertains to the disposition of right-of-��a�-for the construction of mitigation measures, does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR and is noted. Response A4-15: This comment,��hich pertains to the protocols governing��orlc��ithin a State right-of-��ay,does not pertain to the adequac5-of the Draft EIR and is noted. COMMENTER AS City of San Jose,Department of Community Development Andrew Crabtree,Division Manager,Planning Division July 22,2013 Response AS-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response AS-2: According to the VTA Congestion Management Program Requirements for Deficienc�-Plans, adopted November 18, 1992, a Deficienc�-Plan is needed ��hen a Congestion Management Program(CMP)intersection eiceeds its CMP threshold (LOS E) during CMP monitoring,or��hen the intersection is projected to eiceed its threshold as the result of a land use impact analy-sis, and there a�e no feasible improvements or mitigation measures that��ould allo�� it to operate at or better than its threshold. The comment letter identif�ies five CMP intersections��ith significant and una�oidable impacts (four under Bacicground plus Project conditions and one under Cumulative plus Project conditions) and concludes that a Deficienc�-Plan is needed. Ph�-sical improvements have been identified for the four CMP intersections ��ith impacts under Bacicground Plus Project Conditions that��ould mitigate the impacts to a less-than-significant level. Since these intersections a�e in neighboring jurisdictions and the Cit�-of Cupertino cannot gua�antee that those jurisdictions��ould implement the mitigation measures,the impacts are correctl�-identified as significant and una�oidable. Ho«ever,the project applicant��ould be required to provide funding to those jurisdictions of amounts that��ould allo�� for the design and construction of the improve- ments so that those jurisdictions can implement them and mitigate the project impacts. Furthermore, Apple has agreed to coordinate and collaborate��ith the eitra-jurisdictional agencies to construct each mitigation measure, or to provide funding to the agencies to design and construct either: (1)the identified mitigation measure or(2) an altemate improvement��hich mitigates the impact to the satisfaction of the Cit�-of Cupertino. Since these a�e feasible improvements, a deficienc5-plan is not��ai7anted for these P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 44 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES locations. See also Master Response#1: Significant and Una�oidable Impacts. The intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d is projected to operate at LOS E under Cumulative plus Project Conditions. The Cit�-of Cupertino's LOS threshold for this intersection is LOS E+, so a significant impact��as identif�ied. The CMP LOS threshold for this intersec- tion is LOS E. Therefore it«ould not eiceed the CMP LOS tlueshold and a Deficienc�-Plan is not��a�7anted. Ho��ever, Apple��ould be required to pa5- a fau-sha�e contribution to��a�ds implementation of an aclaptive traffic signal s�-stem along De Anza Bouleva�d,to pa�tially-mitigate the impact that��as identif�ied in the Cumulative scenario. The Cit�-of Cupertino is committed to��orlcing collaborativel�-��ith the Cit�- of San Jose and other adjacent jurisdictions to address regional transportation improvements. Pages 411 and 412 of the Draft EIR a�e revised as follo��s: Imnact TRANS-13: Under Cumulative plus Project Conditions, completion of the proposed project would cause intersection #8 De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard to operate at an unacceptable level (change from LOS E+to LOS E) during the PM peak hour based on City of Cupertino LOS impact thresholds. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-13a: At intersection#8 De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Bouleva�d,the provision of an eiclusive southbound right-turn lane (for a total of t��o left-tum lanes,four through lanes, and one right-tum lane) and adjusting the signal timings to accommodate the aclded turn lane«ould improve intersection operations to acceptable levels at LOS E+��ith 58.9 seconds of average dela5-. Ho��ever,this improvement is phy-sically- not feasible, since the��idening of the roacl��a�-to accommodate the southbound right-tum lane��ould impact an underground garage belonging to the off�ice development on the north��est comer of the De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d intersection;therefore the impact at the De Anza Bouleva�d/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d intersection is considered significant and una�oidable. Miti�ation Measure TRANS-13b: The project sponsor shall eipand the TDM program to reduce the severit�-of the impact. Increasing the TDM participation and associated altemative mode sha�e from 28 percent to 34 percent��ould improve operations to LOS E(62.1 seconds); ho��ever the increase in TDM pa�ticipation��ould not reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 45 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Miti�ation Measure TRANS-13c: The project sponsor shall provide a $50,000 fair-sha�e contribution to��a�ds the implementation of an aclaptive traf£ic si�nal s�-stem alon�De Anza Bouleva�d bet��een Homesteacl Roacl and Rainbo�� Drive. Implementation of an adaptive traffic si�nal svstem��ould improve intersection operations; ho��ever it��ould not reduce the impact to a less-than-si�nificant leveL (SU) Response AS-3: Please see Master Response#9: Monitoring TDM Program and Master Response#8: Adequac5-of TDM Penalties. The shuttles referenced in the comment are private shuttles for use on1�-b�-Apple emplo5-ees. The shuttle routes and stops a�e designed based on locations«ith concentrations of emplo5-ee residences and major transit hubs. Apple«ould continue to modifi- its routes and stops in response to its emplo5-ee needs. Maintaining shuttle planning as an in-house activit�-allo��s Apple to be more responsive than if it «ere conducted in collaboration«ith VTA. Response AS-4: Please see Master Response#9: Monitoring TDM Program and Master Response#8: Adequac5-of TDM Penalties. Response AS-5: The eiisting side��allc on the south side of Steven Creelc Bouleva�d��est of Calvert Drive is currentl�-5 feet��ide. The proposed mitigation��ould reduce the buffer bet��een the vehicle travel lane and the side��alk from approii- matel�-5 feet to 1 foot and maintain the eiisting 5-foot side��alk. Because the ��idth of the side��alk��ould not diminish,no significant impact��ould result and no mitigation«ould be required. Response AS-6: Please see Master Response#4: Nitrogen Deposition. As noted in that response, Apple��ould voluntarily-pa5-$126,381, an amount equivalent to the Nitrogen Deposition Fee that��ould be assessed had there been a signif�icant impact from the development of the project, based on the assumption that the project��ould generate 35,106 netne�� dail�-trips. The payment��ould be voluntai�-because the proposed project is not located«ithin the bounda�ies of the Santa Cla�a Valle�-Habitat Plan,��hich established such a fee for its member agencies. This pa5-ment does not constitute "mitigation"for a significant impact related to nitrogen deposition because: 1)the project's contribution to such an impact is not cumulativel�-considerable and 2)the pa5-ment of this amount is pa�t of the project and thus does not constitute mitigation. Response AS-7: The themes of reducing dependenc5-on single-occupanc5-vehicles and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions run through numerous Cit�-documents, including those related to land use planning. The most prominent of these is the Cit�-of Cupertino General Plan,��hich encourages compact,transit- oriented gro��th,multi-modal transportation infrastructure, and the provision of housing for a range of income groups. Please refer to the discussions,in pa�-ticula�, of the Land Use/Communit�-Design Element,��hich promotes ��alkable neighborhoods (see page 142 of the Draft EIR);Housing Element, ��hich promotes housing production in a job-rich a�ea to reduce commutes P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 46 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES (see pages 146 to 147 of the Draft EIR); Circulation Element,��hich promotes connectivit�-and mobilit�-in Cupertino��ith an emphasis on non-automotive transportation(see page 147 of the Draft EIR); and Envuonmental Resources/ Sustainabilit�-Element(see pages 147 to 148 of the Draft EIR). In addition, as discussed on page 134 of the Draft EIR,the Cit�-'s Green Building Ordinance (Section 16.58 of the Municipal Code),��hich toolc effect on July 1, 2013, ��ould reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Cit�-through its support of the use of health�-building materials and construction methods and the promotion of resource efficienc�-and conseivation through the design, construction, retrofit, operation and demolition of ne« buildings and eiisting buildings undergoing renovations. A complete cop5-of the General Plan ma�-be accessed at: http:/h��.cupertino.or�/indei.aspi?page=709. The Green Building Ordinance ma�-be accessed at: http://«��.cupertino.org/ indei.aspi?pa�e=1007. Response AS-8: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER A6 City of Santa Clara Kevin Riley,Director of Planning July 19,2013 Response A6-L This introductoi�-comment,��hich notes the efforts b�-Cit�-of Cupertino staff to meet��ith Cit�-of Santa Cla�a staff to discuss the Draft EIR,is noted. Response A6-2: This comment,��hich references the Cit�-of Santa Cla�a's support of Condition of Approval CA-TRANS-3 described on pages 435 to 436 of the Draft EIR,is noted. This Condition of Approval is designed to reduce the less-than-significant effects of the project on pa�lcing supply-outside the boundaries of the project site. Response A6-3: The mitigation funds referenced in this comment«ould be submitted to the VTA. If the Stevens Creelc BRT project does not move foil�a�d ,the VTA «ould be able to use the funds for an alternative improvement or stud�- to��a�ds the improvement of Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d or the impacted I-280 corridor. Response A6-4: Please see Master Response#1: Significant and Unavoidable Impacts. Response A6-5: Please see Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure. Response A6-6: Project construction vehicles«ould be required to adhere to all road«a�- ��eight limit prohibitions (as��e11 as other local, State, and federal requue- ments). Response A6-7: This concluding comment is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 47 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER A7 Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board(Caltrain) Hilda Lafebre,Manager, Capital Project& Environmental Planning July 22,2013 Response A7-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response A7-2: Apple's eiisting Inf�inite Loop site has approiimatel�- 100 Caltrain riders, ��hich represents approiimatel�-2.4 percent of the 4,200 emplo5-ees at that facilit�-. Assuming a simila�level of Caltrain ridership,the proposed project ��ould result in 340 ne�� Caltrain riders. Assuming that 40 percent of these «ould ride the trains during the pealc hour,the proposed project«ould increase Caltrain pealc-hour ridership b5-approiimatel�- 140 riders (340 i 40 percent). Based on Apple's trip distribution assumptions sho��n in Figure V.I-7 and accessibilit�-to Caltrain stations, approiimatel�-70 percent of these riders«ould tra�el southbound and 30 percent«ould tra�el northbound in the AM pealc hour(98 southbound and 42 northbound riders). Table RTGS lists the AM pealc hour Caltrain train capacities and eipected Apple demand b�-seivice type and direction of tra�el. Table RTC-5: Caltrain AM Peak Hour Ca acit Seats Seats Estimated Available Number of Available Apple Load per Trains Per Per Peak Caltrain Service T�� e Factor Traini Peal�Hour� Hour Riders Southbound Liinited Trains 0.�0 32� 2 6�0 �g E�press Trains(Bab��Bullet) 0.77 1�0 0 0 Northbound Liinited Trains 0.68 208 4 832 42 E�pre55 Trains(Bab� Bullet) 0.93 4� 1 4� Notes: 1.Assiuning totnl cnpncit5 of 6�0 sents per trnin. 2.Niunber of trnins serving Siuin�vnle nnd L,a��rence stntions bnsed on August 2013 trnin schedule. Soiuce:Fel�r&Peers,September 2013. In the southbound direction,the Limited Trains have an available capacit5-of 325 seats (650 seats i(1-O.S loacl factor))and the Eipress Trains ha�e an a�ailable capacity of approiimatel�- 150 seats (650 seats i(1-0.771oad factor)). Bet��een 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. t��o Limited Trains serve the Sunn�,-vale and/or La��rence stations (no Eipress Train seivice is provided to the t��o stations in Sunn�,-vale in the southbound direction in the AM pealc hour); thus in the AM pealc hour Caltrain has a total capacit5-of 650 seats (325 Limited Train capacit5-z 2 trains)in the southbound direction,��hich «ould be sufficient to meet the eipected demand of 98 ne« southbound Caltrain riders from the proposed project. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 4g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Simila�ly,in the northbound duection,the Limited Trains ha�e an a�ailable capacit5-of 208 seats (650 i(1-0.681oacl factor)) and the Eipress Trains ha�e an a�ailable capacity of approiimatel�-45 seats (650 seats i(1-0.93 loacl factor)). Bet��een 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. four Limited Trains and one Eipress Train service the Sunn�,-vale and/or La��rence stations;thus in the AM pealc hour Caltrain has a total capacit5-of 877 seats (208 Limited Train capacit5-i 4 trains plus 45 Eipress Train capacit5-i 1 train)in the north- bound direction,��hich is suff�icient to meet the eipected demand of 42 southbound Caltrain riders. The difference in tra�el times bet«een the Limited and Eipress northbound trains is minimal;thus project employees «ould be eipected to ride either seivice equally. COMMENTER A8 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Roy Molseed, Senior Environmental Planner Michael T. Burns, General Manager July 22,2013 Response A8-L This introductoi�-comment,��hich states that man�-of the Santa Clara Valle�- Transportation Authorit�-'s (VTA's)prelimina��-concems about the project ��ere addressed in the Draft EIR and Transportation Impact Anal�-sis (TIA), is noted. Response A8-2: This comment,��hich requests that bus stops proposed acljacent to the project site be designed such that VTA buses a�e unimpeded b5-Apple-related buses and shuttles,is noted. The ne« VTA bus stops that«ould be developed as pa�-t of the project on North Wolfe Roacl and North Tantau Avenue, as described on page 111 of the Draft EIR,«ould be eiclusivel�-for VTA vehicles. Response A8-3: The proposed intersection modifications generally include minor��idening such as the acldition of one lane on an approach. Due to the combination of the modifications requiring only-minor«idening and the lo« transit, bic�-cle, and pedestrian volumes in the vicinit�-of the affected intersections, secondai�- impacts to non-auto modes«ould be less than significant and thus«ould not require mitigation. It should be noted,ho��ever,that the designs for the modifications«ould incorporate pedestrian-friendl�-treatments such as na�ro« lane��idths and tight comer radii,��here appropriate. For eiample, at the Homesteacl Road/Tantau Avenue (#27) and Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d/Tantau Avenue (#32)intersections,the proposed mitigation measures,��hich involve adding right-turn lanes, also include eliminating eiisting "porlc-chop"islands to improve the pedestrian environment. In addition,mitigation measures that include roacl�va�-«idening«ould generally-only occur at locations«here the project is anticipated to acld a substantial amount of vehicle traffic, thus resulting in poor LOS. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 49 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response A8-4: This comment encourages the Cit�-to consider altematives to��idening intersections��hen Level of Service(LOS)thresholds a�e eiceeded. The Draft EIR utilizes the significance criteria cui7entl�-used b�-the Cit�-. Response A8-5: As discussed on pages 111 to 120 of the Draft EIR,the project��ould include enhancements to bic�-cle and pedestrian facilities tluoughout the streets sui7ounding the project site. In acldition, Mitigation Measure PLAN-2 and Mitigation Measure PLAN-3 ��ould require Apple to implement additional bilce and pedestrian facilit�-improvements,including a coordinated ��a�-finding scheme a�ound the project site perimeter, enhanced bilce lanes and pedestrian paths along the North Wolfe Roacl bridge over I-280, other bic�-cle and pedestrian amenities, ADA improvements, and an altemate Calabazas Creelc path��a5-. Also, Mitigation Measures TRANS-23, TRANS-28, TRANS- 29��ould requue enhancements to the pedestrian envuonment at the North Wolfe Road/Project Access intersection and at the I-280 ramps��ith Wolfe Road. The Cit�-has identified all feasible mitigation to reduce the impacts of road��a�-«idening on the pedestrian and bilce environment in the vicinit�-of the project site. Response A8-6: The appa�ent discrepanc5-identified in the TIA is that Intersection#21, Wolfe Roacl/I-280 Northbound Ramps is indicated as ha�ing a significant project impact in Table ES-1 under Bacicground plus Project and Cumulative plus Project Conditions but is not included in Tables 15 and 16. The infor- mation in Table ES-1 of the TIA is coi7ect. The intersection LOS for Wolfe Road/I-280 Northbound Ramp intersection(#21)��as inadvertentl�-omitted from Tables 15 and 16; although impacts��ere coi7ectl�-identif�ied in Impacts TRANS-5 and TRANS-14 in the Draft EIR for Bacicground and Cumulative plus Project conditions,respectively. Response A8-7: This comment,��hich concurs��ith Mitigation Measure TRANS-22,is noted. Response A8-8: An eipanded free��a�-segment anal�-sis��as conducted to provide more information regarding Impact TRANS-22. This eipanded anal�-sis conducted in response to this comment identifies impacts to additional free��a�- segments. Page 398 of the Draft EIR��i11 be revised to reflect this anal�-sis (see Chapter IV, Teit Revisions, and discussion belo��). These changes are not considered "significant ne�� information"pursuant to CEQA Gz�idelines Section 15088.5 because the�-do not represent a ne�� significant impact or a substantial increase in the severit�-of an impact. The ne��1�-identified segments include segments that a�e more distant from the project site than the ones initiall�-identified in the Draft EIR. In addition,the amount of project traffic that«ould be contributed to the ne«1�-identified segments«ould be less than the amount of project traffic identified in the previously identified segments. While the number of affected segments has increased,the intensit�- of the impact has not increased, since the volume of project traffic diminishes as distance from the project site increases. Therefore,the changes to this impact represent refinements to the impact statement in the Draft EIR and do P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 5� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES not represent a ne�� significant impact or a substantial increase in the severit�- of the impact. Table V.I-10 (Eiisting Plus Project Free��a�-Levels of Seivice) and page 398 of the Draft EIR a�e revised as follo��s. The changes to Table V.I-10 a�e not sho«n using underline and strilceout teit to enhance reaclabilit�-. Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� Mixed-F'lo� Lanes � AM 4400 gg F 29 89 F 0.66% SR 17-Summit Road PM 24 C 11 24 C 0.2�% to Bear Creel.Road S� AM 4400 19 C � 19 C 0.11% PM 4� D 10 4� D 0.23% SR 17-Bear Creel. NE3 `�M 4400 �� F 39 93 F 0.89% Road to Saratoga-Los pM 20 C 1� 20 C 034% Uatos Road SB `�M 4400 17 B 7 17 B 0.16% PM 36 D 1� 36 D 034% SR 17-Saratoga-Los NF3 `�M 4400 �4 E 110 �6 E 2.�0% Uatos Road to Lark pM 28 D 30 28 D 0.68% AM 29 D 13 29 D 030% Avenue SB pM 4400 �0 F �0 71 F 0.91% � AM 4400 3� D 147 36 D 334% SR 17-Lark Avenue PM 23 C 40 23 C 0.91% to SR 8� AM 14 B 17 14 B 039% SB pM 4400 j0 E 100 �1 E 2.27% AM �3 E 20 �3 E 0.29% SR 17-SR 8�to San NF3 �,M 6900 19 C 8 19 C 0.12% Tomas E�press��a�/ o AM 13 B 3 13 B 0.04/o Camden Avenue SB pM 6900 21 C 20 21 C 0.29% SR 17-San Tomas AM � 72 F 39 73 F O.i7% E�press�va��/Camden � pM 6)00 20 C 16 20 C 0.23% Avenue to Hamilton AM 18 B 6 18 B 0.08% Avenue S� PM �g�� 27 D 39 27 D 0.�0% AM 71 F 77 6� F 0.98% SR 17-Hamilton � PM �� 36 D 31 32 D 0.40% Avenue to I-280 AM 26 C 12 26 C 0.17% SB pM 6900 41 D 77 42 D 1.12% AM 119 F 23 121 F O.iO% SR 8�-SR 87 to NE3 pM 4600 2� C 6 2� C 0.13% Almaden AM 22 C 3 22 C 0.07% E�press�va�� SB pM 4600 2� D 19 27 D 0.41% AM 8i F �i 86 F 0.98% SR 8�-Almaden NE3 pM 4600 36 D 12 36 D 0.26% E�press��a� to 0 Camden Avenue SB `�M 4600 �4 C � 24 C 0.11/o PM 41 D 37 41 D 0.80% AM 70 F 60 71 F 1.30% SR 8�-Camden NE3 pM 4600 27 D 16 27 D 03�% Avenue to Union AM 31 D 7 31 D 0.1�% Avenue SB pM 4600 �2 E 48 �3 E 1.0�1% SR 8�-Union NE3 `�M 4600 60 F 81 61 F 1.76% Avenue to S.Bascom pM 27 D 21 27 D 0.�16% Avenue SB `�M 4600 �0 C 10 20 C 0.22% PM 81 F 65 83 F 1.41% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 51 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� � AM 4600 l0i F 108 109 F 2.3�% SR 8�-S.Bascom PM 14 B 28 14 B 0.61% Avenue to SR 17 AM 16 B 12 16 B 0.26% SB �,M 4600 68 F 86 70 F 1.87% � AM 4600 g� F 216 91 F �.70% SR 8�-SR 17 to PM 18 B » 18 B 1.20% WinchesterBlvd AM 14 B 24 14 B 0.�2% SB pM 4600 27 D 171 28 D 3.72% AM 69 F 240 74 F 5.22% SR 8�-Winchester NE3 pM 4600 27 D 62 27 D 13�% Blvd to Saratoga AM 30 D 29 30 D 0.63% Avenue SB pM 4600 j4 E 190 �7 E 4.13% AM 32 D 48 32 D 1.04% SR 8�-Saratoga NF3 pM 4600 21 C 12 21 C 0.26% Avenue to Saratoga- AM 23 C � 23 C 0.11% Sunnvvale Road SB pM 4600 6i F 38 66 F 0.83% AM �4 E 0 47 E 0.00% SR 8�-Saratoga- I�TE3 �290 Sunnvvale Road to pM 21 C 0 18 B 0.00% Stevens Creek Blvd SB `�M 4600 19 C 0 19 C 0.00% PM 9� F 0 9� F 0.00% � AM 4600 109 F 28 110 F 0.61% SR 8�-Stevens PM 19 C 7 19 C 0.1�% Creeli Blvd to I-280 S� AM 6900 1� B 3 12 B 0.04% PM 8� F 22 68 F 0.32% � AM 4600 �� F 31 11� F 0.67% SR 8�-I-280 to W. PM 1� B 223 20 C 4.8�% Homestead Road S� AM 4600 14 B 282 16 B 6.13% PM 2� C 72 26 C L�7% AM 89 F 26 90 F O.i7% SR 8�-W. NE3 4600 Homestead Road to pM 26 C 202 28 D 439% AM 2� C 240 27 D �.22% W.Fremont Avenue SB pM 4600 �3 E 61 �4 E 133% AM 6i F 20 6i F 0.�3% SR 8�-W.Fremont NE3 pM 4600 28 D 143 29 D 3.11% Avenue to El Camulo AM 2� C 186 26 C 4.04% Real SB pM 4600 72 F �i 73 F 0.98% � AM 4600 �� E 12 �2 E 0.26% SR 8�-El Camino PM 28 D 88 29 D 1.91% Real to SR 237 AM 2� C 111 32 D 2.41% SB pM 4600 106 F 27 13� F O.i9% AM 26 C 6 26 C 0.13% SR 8�-SR 237 to � pM 4600 20 C 44 20 C 0.96% C'entral E�press��a� S� AM �E�� 12 B �4 12 B 1.17% PM 90 F 1� 90 F 0.30% SR 8�-Cenh-al NE3 `�M 4600 36 D 6 36 D 0.13% E�press��a� to T JS YM 14 B 42 14 B 0.910% 101 SB `�M 4600 16 B �7 16 B 1.24/o PM 28 D 14 28 D 030% NE3 `�M 9200 9i F 88 96 F 0.96% I-280-US 101 to PM 21 C 31 21 C 034% McLaughlin Avenue AM 18 B 7 18 B 0.08% SB pM 9200 31 D 47 31 D 0.�1% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 52 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� I-280-McLaughlin � AM 9200 7i F 117 76 F 1.27% Avenue to lOth pM 34 D 39 34 D 0.�12% AM 22 C 14 22 C 0.1�% Sh-eet SB pM 9200 �2 E 94 �3 E 1.02% � AM 9200 76 F 130 78 F 1.41% I-280- l Oth Sh-eet to PM 29 D 43 29 D 0.�17% SR 87 AM 20 C 16 20 C 0.17% SB pM 9200 66 F 104 67 F 1.13% AM � 88 F 260 92 F 2.83% I-280-SR 87 to Bud � PM �� 72 F 8� 73 F 0.92% Avenue S� AM 9200 19 C 32 19 C 03�% PM 67 F 207 69 F 2.2i% � AM 9200 88 F 289 92 F 3.1�% I-280-Bu-d Avenue PM 44 D 94 44 D 1.02% to MeridianAvenue AM 30 D 3� 30 D 038% SB �,M 9200 60 F 230 62 F 2.i0% � AM g�l� 113 F 327 112 F 3.8�% I-280-Meridian PM 2� C 116 23 C 136% Avenue to I-880 S� AM 9200 2� C �10 19 C 0.�43% PM 8i F 260 67 F 2.83% � AM 6900 g� F 654 96 F 9.48% I-280-I-880 to PM 34 D 212 3� D 3.07% Winchester Blvd S� AM 6900 �3 C 80 23 C 1.16% PM 103 F 520 116 F 7.i�% I-280-Winchester NE3 `�M 6900 �6 F 728 87 F 10.��% Blvd to Saratoga pM 34 D 247 3� D 3.�8% AM 36 D 94 37 D 136% Avenue SB pM 6900 j 1 E �78 �6 E 838% I-280-Saratoga NE3 `�M 6900 67 F 785 76 F 11.38% Avenue to La�vrence pM 29 D 22� 30 D 3.26% AM 28 D 100 29 D 1.�4�% E�press�va�� SB pM 6900 �� F 623 86 F 9.03% AM 62 F 382 66 F i.i4% I-280-La�vrence NE3 pM 6900 32 D 106 33 D 1.��1% E�press��a� to Wolfe c o Road SB `�M 6900 �� C 67 2� C 0.�7/0 PM 63 F 411 67 F 5.96% � AM 6900 �� E 13> >8 E 1.96% I-280-Wolfe Road to PM 31 D 70� 3� D 10.22% De Anza Blvd AM � 29 D 8�0 33 D 1232% SB pM 6)00 �� F 269 103 F 3.90% AM � �7 E 136 �8 E 1.97% I-280-De Anza Blvd � pM 6)00 29 D 672 32 D 9J�1% to SR 8� S� AM 6900 �4 C 831 28 D 12.0�1% PM 81 F 245 85 F 3.55% � AM 6900 62 F 107 63 F L55% I-280-SR 8�to PM 24 C 439 26 C 636% FoothillE�press�va�� S� AM 6900 �6 C �34 29 D 7J�1% PM 70 F 178 72 F 2.58% AM 41 D 86 42 D 1.2�% I-280-Foothill NF3 pM 6900 23 C 368 2� C �33% E�press��a� to 0 AM 30 D 436 32 D 6.32/0 Magdalena Avenue SB pM 6900 j 1 E 146 �2 E 2.12% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L SJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� I-280-Magdalena � AM g�� 36 D 81 42 D 1.01% Avenue to El Monte pM 22 C 326 27 D 4.0�% AM 27 D 402 29 D �137% Road SB pM 9200 �0 F 134 71 F 1.46% AM 31 D 6� 31 D 0.71% I-280-El Monte NE3 pM 9200 21 C 261 22 C 2.84% Road to La Barranca AM 20 C 322 21 C 3.�0% Road SB pM 9200 63 F 87 6� F 0.9i% AM 29 D 6� 30 D 0.72% I-280-La Barranca NB pM �� 24 C 261 26 C 2.91% Road to Page Mill AM 20 C 322 21 C 3.�0% Road SB pM 9200 �g E 87 i9 F 0.9i% � AM 9200 23 C 39 23 C 0.42% I-280-Page Mill PM 4� D 1�7 46 D 1.71% Road to Alpine Road AM 24 C 193 2� C 2.10% SB pM 9200 23 C �2 23 C 0.�7% AM 8� F 3i 8i F O.il% I-880-I-280 to NF3 pM 6900 18 B 229 19 C 3.32% Stevens Creel. AM 20 C 308 22 C 4.46% Boulevard SB pM 6900 29 D 93 30 D 13�% AM 81 F 32 82 F 0.�6% I-880-Stevens Creek NF3 pM 6900 2� C 206 26 C 2.99% Boulevard to N. AM 61 F 277 64 F 4A1% BascomAvenue SB pM 6900 �2 E 84 �3 E 1.22% I-880-N.Bascom NE3 `�M 6900 �6 F 2� 76 F 0.3i% Avenue to The pM 29 D 1» 30 D 2.2�% AM 26 C 208 27 D 3.01% Alameda SB pM 6900 j6 E 63 �7 E 0.91% � AM 6900 g� F 18 8� F 0.26% I-880-The Alameda PM 29 D 116 30 D 1.68% to Coleman Avenue S� AM 6900 31 D 1�6 32 D 2.26% PM 7� F �7 7i F 0.68% � AM 6900 �4 E 14 �4 E 0.20% I-880-Coleman PM 33 D 87 33 D 1.26% Avenue to SR 87 S� AM 6900 31 D 117 32 D 1.70% PM 6� F 3i 6� F O.il% � AM 6900 » E 14 » E 0.20% I-880-SR 87 to N. PM 40 D 87 41 D 1.26% lst Sh-eet S� AM 6900 3� D 117 36 D 1.70% PM 73 F 3i 7� F O.il% � AM 6900 �� F 13 72 F 0.19% I-880-N. lst Sh-eet PM 44 D 78 4� D 1.13% to US 101 S� AM 6900 �� C 10� 26 C L�2% PM 8i F 32 86 F 0.�6% EB `�M 6900 » E 10 » E 0.14% I-880-US 101 to E. PM 60 F 62 61 F 0.90% Broka�v Road AM � 24 C 84 24 C 1.22% WE3 pM 6)00 67 F 26 67 F 0.38% I-880-E.Broka�v EB `�M 6900 30 D 6 30 D 0.09% Road to Montague pM 36 D 37 36 D 0.�4% E�p�vy WB `�M 6900 30 D �0 30 D 0.72°�/0 - PM 79 F 16 79 F 0.23/o P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 54 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� I-880-Montague EB `�M 6900 �� D 3 27 D 0.0�1% E�p�vy to Ureat Mall pM 6i F 19 6i F 0.28�% AM 41 D 2� 41 D 036/0 Pl:�v�� WE3 PM 6900 �i F 8 7i F 0.12% EB `�M 4400 g� F 7 82 F 0.16% SR 237-SR 8�to PM 23 C �0 23 C 1.14% C'entral E�press��a� AM 24 C' 63 24 C' 1.43% WB pM 4400 j6 E 16 �6 E 036% SR 237-CenTial EB `�M 4400 31 D 4 31 D 0.09% E�press�va��to Maude pM 13 B 2� 13 B 0.�7�/0 Avenue WE3 `�M 4400 13 B 32 13 B 0.73/o PM 62 F 8 62 F 0.18% EB `�M 4400 60 F 2 60 F O.Oi% SR 237-Maude PM 2� C 13 2� C 030% Avenue to US 101 AM 31 D 24 31 D 0.»% WE3 pM 4400 60 F 6 60 F 0.1�% High-Occu anc��Vehicle O Lanes AM 61 F � 61 F 0.2�% SR 8�-SR 87 to � pM 16�0 12 B 1 12 B 0.06% Almaden E�press�va�� AM 1�� 4 A 0 4 A 0.00% PM 20 C 3 20 C 0.18% AM 4� D 8 4� D 0.48% SR 8�-Almaden NE3 pM 16�0 � A 2 9 A 0.12% E�press��a� to 0 AM 10 A 1 10 A 0.06/o Camden Avenue SB pM 16�0 24 C 6 24 C 036% AM 42 D 11 42 D 0.67% SR 8�-Camden NF3 pM 16�0 10 A 3 10 A 0.18% Avenue to Union AM 8 A 1 8 A 0.06% Avenue SB pM 16�0 30 D 9 30 D 0.»% SR 8�-Union NE3 `�M 16�0 37 D 14 37 D 0.8�% Avenue to S.Bascom pM 11 A 4 11 A 0.24% Avenue SB `�M 16�0 � A 1 � A 0.06% PM 37 D 11 37 D 0.67% � AM 16�0 �� F 19 78 F 1.15% SR 8�-S.Bascom PM 18 B � 18 B 030% Avenue to SR 17 S� AM 16�0 14 B 2 14 B 0.12% PM 2� C 1� 2� C 0.91% AM 90 F 38 92 F 2.30% SR 8�-SR 17 to � pM 16�0 g A 10 8 A 0.61% Winchester Blvd AM 6 A 4 6 A 0.24% SB pM 16�0 24 C 30 24 C 1.82% AM 46 D 42 47 E 2.»% SR 8�-Winchester NE3 pM 16�0 g A 10 8 A 0.61% Blvd to Saratoga AM 4 A 2 4 A 0.12% Avenue SB pM 16�0 2� D 33 29 D 2.00% SR 8�-Saratoga NF3 `�M 16�0 31 D 8 31 D 0.48% Avenue to Saratoga- pM 7 A 2 7 A 0.12% AM 6 A 1 6 A 0.06% Sunnvvale Road SB pM 16�0 26 C 7 26 C 0.42% SR 8�-Saratoga- NF3 `�M 16�0 �1 C 0 21 C 0.00% Sunnvvale Road to pM 8 A 0 8 A 0.00% Stevens Creel.Blvd SB `�M 16�0 6 A 0 6 A 0.00% PM 31 D 0 31 D 0.00% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 55 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� � AM j�-�� 21 C 0 21 C 0.00% SR 8�-Stevens PM 8 A 0 8 A 0.00% Creel.Blvd to I-280 AM 9 A 0 9 A 0.00% SB pM 16�0 2� D 0 29 D 0.00% � AM 16�0 60 F 0 60 F 0.00% SR 8�-I-280 to W. PM 9 A 0 9 A 0.00% Homestead Road AM 7 A 0 7 A 0.00% SB pM 16�0 2� D 0 29 D 0.00% AM 41 D � 41 D 030% SR 8�-W. NE3 16�0 Homestead Road to pM � A 21 � A 1.27% AM 9 A 42 10 A 2.»% W.Fremont Avenue SB pM 16�0 21 C 11 21 C 0.67% AM 47 E 3 47 E 0.18% SR 8�-W.Fremont NE3 pM 16�0 � A 24 9 A 1.4�% Avenue to El Camulo AM 7 A 26 7 A L�8% Real SB pM 16�0 2� C 8 2� C 0.48% AM 39 D 2 39 D 0.12% SR 8�-El Camino � pM 16�0 � A 12 7 A 0.73% Real to SR 237 AM 9 A 16 9 A 0.97% SB pM 16�0 29 D � 29 D 030% � AM 16�0 �4 C 1 24 C 0.06% SR 8�-SR 237 to PM � A 6 � A 036% CenTialE�press�va�� AM 1E�� 7 A 10 7 A 0.61% PM 18 B 2 18 B 0.12% SR 8�-Cenh-al NF3 `�M 16�0 1� B 1 1� B 0.06% E�press�va��to US pM 7 A 8 7 A 0.48�/0 AM 4 A 7 4 A 0.42/o 101 SB pM 16�0 7 A 2 7 A 0.12% � AM 16�0 32 D �8 33 D 3.�2% I-280-Meridian PM 6 A 9 6 A 0.»% Avenue to I-880 AM 13 B 7 13 B 0.�12% SB pM 16�0 82 F 46 84 F 2.79% AM �0 E 116 �3 E 7.03% I-280-I-880 to � pM 16�0 18 B 37 19 C 2.2�1% Winchester Blvd AM 12 B 14 12 B 0.8�% SB pM 16�0 92 F 92 97 F 5.58% AM 43 D 128 �16 D 7J6% I-280-Winchester NF3 pM 16�0 11 A 30 11 A 1.82% Blvd to Saratoga AM 10 A 10 10 A 0.61% Avenue SB pM 16�0 2� D 102 30 D 6.18% I-280-Saratoga NE3 `�M 16�0 �g E 139 62 F 8.42% Avenue to La�vrence pM 7 A 20 7 A 1.21% AM 9 A 11 9 A 0.67% E�press�va�� SB pM 16�0 32 D 110 34 D 6.67% I-280-La�vrence NE3 `�M 16�0 �6 E 0 �6 E 0.00% E�press�va��to Wolfe pM 10 A 0 10 A 0.00�/0 Road SB `�M 16�0 12 B 0 12 B 0.00% PM 39 D 0 39 D 0.00% � AM 16�0 �0 E 0 �0 E 0.00% I-280-Wolfe Road to PM 9 A 0 9 A 0.00% De Anza Blvd AM 18 B 0 18 B 0.00% SB pM 16�0 33 D 0 33 D 0.00% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 56 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service Existing Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� � AM 16�0 32 D 24 32 D 1.4�% I-280-De Anza Blvd PM 10 A 83 11 A �.03% to SR 8� AM 9 A 106 11 A 6.42% SB pM 16�0 2� C 43 26 C 2.61% � AM 16�0 42 D 19 42 D 1.1�% I-280-SR 8�to PM 11 A 71 12 B 430% Foothill E�press�va�� AM 1� B 94 16 B �.70% SB pM 16�0 18 B 31 18 B 1.88% I-280-Foothill NF3 `�M 16�0 40 D 1� 40 D 0.91% E�press��a��to pM 7 A 40 8 A 2.42�/0 Magdalena Avenue SB `�M 16�0 13 B 66 14 B 4.00% PM 13 B 21 13 B 1.27% Notes: Bold font indicates unacceptable operations based on VTA's LOS E Standard.Bold and highlighted indicates significant inlpacts. ' NE3=Northbound.SB=Southbound. ' AM=morning pealc hour,PM=afternoon pealc hour. 3 vph=vehicles per hour � Measured in passenger c�us per mile per l�ule. � LOS=level of seiti ice. ` Project tr�ips added to uidividual fi-ee��a� seginents � Percent ConTiibution dete��uiined bv dividing the number of project hips b�the fiee��av segmenY s capacit�. Source:2011 Monitoring and Conformance Report,VTA,Mav 2012. Impact TRANS-22: Completion of the proposed project would add substantial amounts of traffic to the following terr mixed flow segments and e�HOV freeway segments operating at LOS F: • I-280, Southbound,El Monte Road to Ma�dalena Avenue • I-280,Northbound, SR 85 to Foothill Expressway • I-280, Southbound,Foothill Expressway to SR 85 • I-280, Southbound, SR 85 to De Anza Boulevard • I-280, Southbound,De Anza Boulevard to Wolfe Road • I-280,Northbound,Lawrence Expressway to Wolfe Road • I-280, Southbound,Wolfe Road to Lawrence Expressway/ Stevens Creek Boulevard • I-280,Northbound, Saratoga Avenue to Lawrence Expressway/ Stevens Creek Boulevard • I-280, Southbound,Lawrence Expressway/Stevens Creek Boulevard to Saratoga Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Winchester Boulevard to Saratoga Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Winchester Boulevard to I-880 • I-280, Southbound,Winchester Boulevard to I-880 P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 57 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES • I-280,Northbound,I-880 to Meridian Avenue • I-280, Southbound,I-880 to Meridian Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Meridian Avenue to Bird Avenue • I-280, Southbound,Meridian Avenue to Bird Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Bird Avenue to SR 87 • I-280, Southbound,Bird Avenue to SR 87 • I-280,Northbound, SR 87 to lOt" Street • I-280, Southbound, SR 87 to lOt" Street • I-280,Northbound, lOt" Street to McLau�hlin Avenue • I-280,HOV,Northbound, Saratoga Avenue to Lawrence Expressway • I-280,HOV, Southbound,Winchester Boulevard to I-880 • I-280,HOV, Southbound,I-880 to Meridian Avenue • SR 85,Northbound,Winchester Boulevard to SR 17+HOV�e r.,...,a„� n.,,,�,,,, • SR 85,Northbound, Saratoga Avenue to Winchester Boulevard • SR 85, Southbound, SR 17 to Bascom Avenue • SR 85,Northbound, SR 17 to Bascom Avenue+HOV • SR 85, Southbound,Bascom Avenue to Union Avenue • SR 85,Northbound,Bascom Avenue to Union Avenue • SR 85,Northbound,Union Avenue to Camden Avenue • I-880, Southbound,Bascom Avenue to Stevens Creek Boulevard These freeway segments would be impacted under the Existing Plus Project Conditions based on CMP guidelines. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-22: The project sponsor shall pa5-a $_�Fr,9991,292,215 fair share contribution to��ards�e planned transportation projects :�'��•:��' :� ��'n�� r�»,,,, �,��,,,�.�,,,,��;,,,,, i'��s-that��ould improve traf£ic operations of the impacted free«a�-segments and provide added transportation � ' � - ' _ ' - P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 5 g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES capacit5-on parallel facilities: (1) SR 85 Eipress Lane project (converting the eiisting HOV lane to a toll lane to allo�� single occupant vehicles to drive in the HOV lane for a fee) bet��een Mountain Vie« and San Jose; (2)eliminatin�the eiistin� bottlenecic on southbound I-280 bet��een El Monte Roacl and Magdalena Avenue; and (�� either the Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) stations proposed��ithin Cupertino ^� c.o�.o„� r,-ooi.u,.,,io�.,,,-,� ,,.�x�,.i� ��' ��' T'° n�� '��„'°T-�,��' or an altemative improvement or stud�-to��a�ds the improvement of the impacted I-280 corridor or a pa�allel coi7idor that��ould provide capacit�-. The fair sha�e contribution amount��as calculated in consultation��ith VTA staff based on the project's contribution to project gro��th on the impacted free��a�-segment. It is unlilcel�-that the Eipress Lane or BRT project��ould be imple- mented prior to project completion and that these improvements ��ould reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. In addition, the Cit�-has no control over the implementation of these mitigation measures; therefore the impact to the free��a�-segments��ould remain significant and unavoidable. (SU) Response A8-9: This comment references Mitigation Measures TRANS-1, TRANS-5, TRANS-14, TRANS-25, TRANS-26, and TRANS-29,��hich relate to changes to the I-280/Wolfe Roacl free��a�-ramps. As eiplained in the Draft EIR,these changes��ould be under the jurisdiction of Caltrans. The comment that these changes remain��ithin the Caltrans right-of-��a�-is noted. Response A8-10: Please see Response to Comment A4-4. Response A8-1 L This concluding comment is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 5g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES B. ORGANIZATIONS P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 6� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER Bl Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition Corinne Winter July 22,2013 Response B1-L This introductoi�-comment,��hich states that"Apple has done an eiempla��- job of incorporating [the Silicon Valle�-Bic�-cle Coalition's] suggestions to malce this pa�t of Cupertino more bilce-friendly,"is noted. Response B1-2: This comment,��hich discusses the improvements to bilce infrastructure and facilities around the project site that Apple��ould implement as pa�-t of the project,is noted. These improvements a�e discussed on pages 111 to 112 of the Draft EIR and a�e graphically-depicted in Figures III-20a through III-20f of the Draft EIR. The TDM measures proposed as pa�-t of the project and referenced in the comment are described on pages 121 to 122 of the Draft EIR. Response B1-3: The operations of southbound North Tantau Avenue��ere comprehensivel�- evaluated from a multi-modal perspective. Evaluation of the VISSIM model results during the PM pealc hour sho��ed that the vehicula�volumes tra�eling south from the project site and turning right onto Vallco Parlc��a�-��ould ��a�rant the provision of a second southbound through lane at the I-280 overcrossing. The provision of a single through lane on the I-280 overcross- ing��ould result in a bottleneck��ith significant queues on southbound North Tantau Avenue. It should be noted that eicessive queuing can leacl to impa- tient driving beha�ior,«hich could adversel�-affect bic�-cle and pedestrian tra�el on southbound North Tantau Avenue. Response B 1-4: Reverse angle pa�lcing is safer for bic�-clists. Ho��ever,it is currentl�-not being proposed for Vallco Parlc��a�-as it is not�-et an established vehicle pa�lcing configuration and therefore is not familia�to most motorists. Although the provision of 6-foot bilce lanes��ould further improve the bic�-cling environment,the provision of 5-foot bilce lanes is aclequate and meets Caltrans engineering standards. Response B1-5: This concluding commentis noted. COMMENTER B2 SEIU-United Service Workers West July 19,2013 Response B2-L This comment does not pertain to the adequac5-of the Draft EIR and is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 61 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER B3 Concerned Citizens of Cupertino July 17,2013 Response B3-L This comment,��hich conve�-s a table of contents for the remainder of the letter,is noted. Response B3-2: This comment provides information from the Cit�-of Menlo Pa�lc on the Faceboolc Campus Project and a quote from the Cupertino Courier on the Apple Campus 2 project, and is noted. Response B3-3: This comment provides suggestions for the Cit�-to consider in acldressing traffic congestion and pa�lcing. See also Master Response: Traf£ic Congestion. In response to the comment, "What is the baseline number of pealc hour trips,"as noted on page 388 of the Draft EIR,the baseline number of dai1�-trips in the AM Pealc Hour is 1,270 and the number of PM Pealc Hour trips is 1,587. Response B3-4: As described in Chapter III,Project Description, a total of 14,200 employees a�e proposed to be located at the Apple Campus 2 project at build-out. The terms of Apple leases at other locations is not pa�t of the project evaluated in the Draft EIR. Response B3-5: Please see Chapter V., Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures,page 182 in the Draft EIR for a discussion of the baseline environmental setting used in the Draft EIR The estimated amount of vehicle traf£ic to be added b�-the project is as stated in the Transportation Impact Anal�-sis page iii, Appendii B of the Draft EIR and on pages 387 and 388 of the Draft EIR. Response B3-6: This comment provides information on pa�lcing ratios and spaces, and states that the number of pa�lcing spaces provided is less than the number of spaces required b5-the City's Parlcing Ordinance. See the evaluation of pa�lcing in the Draft EIR on pages 432-437,��hich eiplains that in Planned Development zones,in��hich the project is located,the pa�lcing ratios set out in the Cit�-'s Parlcing Ordinance ma�-be used as a guideline and that it is appropriate to consider site-and project-specific parlcing needs. The Draft EIR anal�-zes the anticipated pa�lcing needs and concludes that the amount of pa�lcing provided��ould be adequate for the project��ith implementation of Mitigation Measure TRANS-35. The Cit�-has balanced the need to provide aclequate parlcing to ensure that neighboring a�eas are not impacted and the concept of using limited parlcing as a tool to manage the number of people that drive to the project site, and has concluded that the provision of 10,980 pa�lcing spaces is aclequate, based in pa�t on the pa�lcing stud5-conducted at the Infinite Loop and Mariani Avenue campuses. The Draft EIR confirms that the proposed pa�lcing«ould be adequate to meet on-site demand,«hile also recommending Condition of Approval CA-TRANS-3 to ensure the ongoing management of pa�lcing issues,if an�-a�ise. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 62 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response B3-7: The eiisting level of service at the intersection of Blane�-Avenue/Homesteacl Road (Intersection#13) and Wolfe Roacl/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d (Intersec- tion#24)is sho��n in Figure V.I-6 on page 371 of the Draft EIR The level of seivice at these intersections��ith the project is sho��n on Figure V.I-8 on page 392 of the Draft EIR. The intersections of Blane�-Avenue/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d and Stevens Creelc Boulevard/Perimeter Road«ere not included as stud�-intersections, and thus associated level of seivice is not reported in the Draft EIR The side streets at these intersections ha�e compa�atively-lo�� traffic volumes and the�- operate at good levels of seivice. The project��ould add traffic to the Stevens Creelc Boulevard approaches at these intersections,��hich have eicess capacit5-. Therefore it��as determined that the proj ect��ould not ha�e an impact at these locations and no further anal�-sis��as required. Wolfe Roacl and Perimeter Road do not intersect. The comment is lilcel�- referring to the right-tum-on1�-ramp connectors bet��een Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road. These connectors are right-tum-on1�-locations to and from the Vallco Shopping Mall,��ith fe�� conflicting movements and,therefore, «ere not anal�-zed. Perimeter Road«as designed to accommodate traffic ��ith full occupanc5-of the shopping center. An�-traffic added b�-the project to Perimeter Road��ould comprise people shopping at the center and��ould not eiceed the capacit5-of the road��a�-. Therefore no anal�-sis of project impacts along Perimeter Road��as conducted. Response B3-8: The project sponsor��ould be required to��orlc��ith the Cit�-of Cupertino, VTA, and Caltrans to construct interchange improvements,including ramp ��idening, at the Wolfe Roacl/I-280 interchange,to mitigate project impacts. The sponsor��ould also be required to pa5-a fair share contribution to the planned Eipress Lanes on SR 85 and malce either a contribution to the BRT planned on Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d or an altemative improvement or stud�- to��a�ds the improvement of the I-280 coi7idor to offset free��a�-impacts. While the Eipress Lane project does not add lanes,it allo��s single occupant vehicles (SOVs)to use the ca�pool lane,thus allo��ing more SOVs to use the other lanes,therefore improving free��a5-operations. Both the VTA and Caltrans support this approach. Response B3-9: Unused traffic mitigation funds��ould be returned to Apple. Response B3-10: This comment provides information from a Cit�-Council report on the C1�-de Avenue (Samsung)project and is noted. Response B3-11: Please see Master Response#12: Trip Cap and Master Response: Adequac5- of TDM Penalties. Response B3-12: Trip count monitoring��ould commence��ithin 6 months of project occupanc5-, even pa�-tial occupanc5-of Phase L If AM or PM pealc hour trip P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 6J LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES counts are not met,then Apple��ould be required to meet��ith the Cit�-��ithin 60 da�-s of not meeting the trip count to develop a plan and identifi-ne�� TDM measures. Please see Master Response: Adequac5-of TDM Penalties. Response B3-13: This comment provides information from a Cit�-Council report on the C1�-de Avenue (Samsung)project and is noted. Simila�to the agreement bet��een Samsung and the Cit�-of Mountain Vie��,the TDM monitoring program, as described on pages 443 to 448 of the Draft EIR,��ould institute substantial penalties if Apple does not meet the established pealc trip counts goal. Furthermore, such penalties��ould be assessed for evei�-da�-during the established monitoring period that the pealc trip counts eiceed the goal. Please see Master Response#12: Trip Cap and Master Response: Adequac5- of TDM Penalties. As discussed in Master Response: Adequac5-of TDM Penalties, even a modest eiceedance of 200 trips during the AM pealc period and 200 trips during the PM pealc period (approiimatel�-4.7 percent of the AM pealc trip counts goal and 4.5 percent of the PM pealc trip counts goal) ��ould incur a penalt5-of$260,000 over a 6-month monitoring period. These penalties are compa�able to those established b�-the Cit�-of Mountain Vie�� for Sainsung. Response B3-14: This comment provides information on establishing a transportation management association and TDMs from the Cit�-of Mountain Vie��,Palo Altq and Emei�-ville, and is noted. Response B3-15: This comment provides information on measures required of employment uses associated��ith the provision of housing and is noted. Response B3-16: This comment provides recommendations and suggestions for the provision of pa�lc space in reference to Mitigation Measure PLAN-1 and support for Apple's pa�ticipation in the design of the Calabazas Creelc Trail. See also Master Response#13: Calabazas Creelc Trail. Response B3-17: This comment suggests that an independent fiscal impact analy-sis be prepared and considered in the Draft EIR and additional information on tai revenues and the Development Agreement be provided. In response,please see Master Response#2: Project Merits, cla�ify-ing that detailed responses to comments that raise on1�-economic or social issues,rather than environ- mental issues, a�e not requued. In rega�ds to a discussion of school seivice bounda�ies and project effects on schools, see pages 563-567 and 581-584 in the Draft EIR This comment also provides information on local sales tai revenue,tai sharing, construction taies and fees, and fees and requued funding of transportation improvements as stated in Mitigation Measures contained in the Draft EIR These comments a�e noted, but to the eitent that the�-focus on fiscal and economic considerations,no further response is required. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 64 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response B3-18: This comment provides aclditional information to support comment B3-17 and is noted. Response B3-19: This comment provides aclditional information to support comment B3-17 and is noted. Response B3-20: This comment provides information and suggestions regarding public access to the Apple propert5-, design and construction of the Calabazas Creelc Trail, and the closure of Pruneridge Avenue (per Mitigation Measures PLAN-1, PLAN-2,PLAN-3 and TRANS-31). The comment provides information from other projects and planning documents, and support for construction of the Calabazas Creek Trail and a public park on Tantau Avenue. Please see Master Response#13: Calabazas Creelc Trail, Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. Response B3-2 L This comment provides aclditional information to support comment B3-20 and is noted. Response B3-22: This comment supports an altemative that��ould retain Pruneridge Avenue, and ha�e the Apple Campus project eitended and built over the road. As stated on page 597 of the Draft EIR, CEQA requires the anal�-sis of a reasonable range of altematives to the proposed project, or to the location of the proposed project,��hich��ould feasibl�-attain most of the proposed project's basic objectives and a�oid or substantia11�-1essen an�-of the significant effects of the proposed project. The range of altematives required in an EIR is governed b�-a"rule of reason"that requires the EIR to set forth on1�-those altematives necessa��-to permit a reasoned choice. The altemative suggested in this comment is simila�to three altematives considered in the Draft EIR The retention of Pruneridge Avenue as a public right-of-��a�-��as incorporated into a project altemative (the Pruneridge Avenue altemative), ��hich is discussed on pages 605 to 612 of the Draft EIR. As discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR,t��o additional altematives allo��ing for public access across the site (a Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative and a Mobilit�- and Pa�lc altemative)«ere rejected from detailed anal�-sis because the�-«ould inteifere��ith major utilit5-lines,��ould infringe on private propert5-,result in aclverse visual impacts,«ould incur significant costs,and/or«ould still pose significant securit�-concems. The altemative proposed in this comment��ould ha�e similar effects to those altematives alread�-evaluated in the Draft EIR. This comment also repeats comments made in B3-16 and B3-20 in rega�ds to support for constructing the Calabazas Creelc Trail as publically-accessible open space. See Master Response#13: Calabazas Creelc Trail. As discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR, a Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative��as prelimina�il�-evaluated. Such an alternative��ould maintain the cui7ent east/��est thoroughfare through the project site. Ho��ever,the evaluation concluded that construction of the tunnel��ould interfere��ith a major sanitai�-se��er line,infringe on private property,result in aclverse P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 65 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES visual impacts, and incur significant costs. The increased eica�ation«ould also require aclditional off-haul of soil and��ould increase greenhouse gas emissions at the project site. Simila�ly,the construction of a"land bridge" over Pruneridge Avenue could require the import of more material(and associated air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions). The development of a bridge across the project site, connecting North Wolfe Road to North Tantau Avenue,��ould result in significant visual and other environmental impacts, such as noise impacts,to the adjacent neighbors, especially-sensitive receptors at The Hamptons. The foundation for such a la�ge structure��ould inteifere��ith utilit�-and roacl s�-stems seiving both the project and The Hamptons and could require the acquisition of right-of-��a�- to accommodate the structural s�-stem. A bridge��ould also conflict��ith a lce5-project objective related to the provision of a single, secure campus, as (depending on its design)the bridge could allo« for vie«s duectl�-into campus buildings. Response B3-23: This comment provides aclditional information to support comment B3-22 and is noted. Response B3-24: The comment provides information on development agreements and communit�-benefits related to other projects, and states that"mitigation measures should not be considered duect communit�-benefits."The mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR a�e required to lessen or a�oid the significant environmental effects of the project, as requued b5- CEQA. Response B3-25: See Response B3-22. Response B3-26: This comment provides aclditional information to support comment B3-25 and is noted. COMMENTER B4 Cupertino Chamber of Commerce Mark Matsumoto, Government Affairs Specialist July 10,2013 Response B4-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response B4-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 66 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER BS Erik's Deli Cafe Sam Ashknaz, Owner July 8,2013 Response BS-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B6 Cypress Hotel and Park Place Restaurant Maria Streeby,Director of Operations June 24,2013 Response B6-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B7 Santa Clara & San Benito Counties Building & Construction Trades Council Neil Struthers, CEO June 7,2013 Response B7-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response B7-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B8 Los Gatos Chamber of Commerce Dianne Anderson,President June 20,2013 Response B8-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The comment about the project's "envuonmental and sustainable ideas"is noted. The environmental implications of these sustainabilit�-features a�e eiplored throughout the Draft EIR, but specificall�-in Section V.K, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sustainabilitv. COMMENTER B9 Cupertino Historical Society Donna Austin,President June 19,2013 Response B9-L This comment,��hich eipresses support for the relocation of Glendenning Ba�n,is noted. The proposed relocation of the ba�n is described on pages 133 to 134 of the Draft EIR The envuonmental implications of this proposed relocation a�e described on pages 279 to 283 of the Draft EIR. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 67 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER B10 Erik's Deli Cafe Sam Ashknaz, Owner June 12,2013 Response B10-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER Bll VJONES Salon Barry Jones, CEO June 12,2013 Response B11-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B12 Cupertino Chamber of Commerce June 12,2013 Response B12-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B13 Silicon Valley Leadership Group Carl Guardino,President/CEO June 11,2013 Response B13-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response B13-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. This comment references some of the sustainabilit�-features��hich a�e incorporated into the project and a�e discussed in the Draft EIR,including the TDM Program,the provision of open space, and the use of altemative forms of energy.No further response is required. COMMENTER B14 City of Cupertino Orrin Mahoney,Mayor June 26,2013 Response B14-L This comment comprises a transcribed inteivie�� ith Cit�-of Cupertino Ma�-or Oi7in Mahone�-on KMTV Communit�-Television,��hich seives Cupertinq Los Altos, and Mountain Vie��. This transcript contains no comments on the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR The CitS-generally-agrees��ith the cha�acterization of an EIR that is conve�-ed in the comment—specifically, P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 6g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES that the EIR is a disclosure document that identifies the signif�icant environmental impacts of the project, but does not prescribe a specific outcome rega�ding project approval. COMMENTER B15 Kimco Realty David Jamieson,Vice President Asset Management May 16, 2013 Response B15-L This comment,which conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response B15-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The road��a�-changes proposed as pa�-t of the project,including those in the vicinit�-of Cupertino Village, a�e discussed on pages 100 to 120 of the Draft EIR. COMMENTER B16 Bitter+Sweet Janice Chua, Owner June 7,2013 Response B16-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B17 Los Altos Patch L.A. Chung,Editor June 6,2013 Response B17-L This comment comprises an email eichange bet��een a Patch.com editor and Cit�-of Cupertino Mayor,in��hich the editor aslcs for the Ma�-or's thoughts on the Draft EIR The specif�ic environmental topics listed in the comment a�e all discussed in detail in the Draft EIR, as follo��s: • Closure of Pruneridge Avenue: discussed throughout Draft EIR, but see in particula�pages 150-152; 156-159; and 427-430. • Haza�dous materials from building demolition: see pages 344-345 of Draft EIR. • Relocation of Glendenning Ba�n: see pages 279-283 of Draft EIR. • Protection of trees along North Wolfe Roacl and East Homesteacl Avenue: see Figure III-3 (Eiisting and Proposed Trees) on page 57 of Draft EIR. • Noise abatement: discussed throughout Section V.J,Noise, but see in pa�-ticula�pages 464-480. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 6g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES • Jobs,housing a�ailability, and schools: see pages 225-233 for a discussion of the interrelationship bet«een jobs and housing demand; see pages 581-584 for a discussion of the project's anticipated less-than- significant impacts on schools. COMMENTER B18 San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce Matthew R Mahood, CEO and President May 31, 2013 Response B18-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. Response B18-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B19 Sand Hill Property Company Peter Pau May 29, 2013 Response B19-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B20 Silicon Valley Leadership Group Shiloh Ballard June 26,2013 Response B20-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B21 Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce Steve Van Dorn June 26,2013 Response B21-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER B22 Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter Megan Fluke Medeiros, Conservation and Development Manager July 22,2013 Response B22-L This comment,��hich conve�-s an attached letter,is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 7� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response B22-2: This introductoi�-comment,��hich summarizes the Siei7a Club Loma Prieta Chapter's guidelines for evaluating development projects,is noted. Response B22-3: This comment lists components of the project that the commenter supports. Please see Master Response#4: Nitrogen Deposition for an eiplanation of the finding in the Draft EIR that the proj ect��ould not malce a signif�icant contribution to cumulative impacts associated��ith nitrogen deposition. Response B22-4: This comment introduces the neit several comments,��hich focus on the transportation impacts of the project. Response B22-5: The mode-sha�e split target of 34 percent identified for the project in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b is reasonable given the project's suburban location and distance from rail stations,��hich pose an impediment to a large scale adoption of mass transit seivices. Some Caltrain stations a�e reasonabl�- close (i.e., La��rence and Sunn�,-vale), but lacic the eipress seivice offered at the Mountain Vie�� station,for eiample. Apple��ould acldresses the relative sca�cit�-of public transit services b�-aclding TDM strategies. Apple's cui7ent TDM Program includes a variet�-of ineasures to reduce travel b�-single occupanc5-vehicles,including the use of commuter coach bus seivices,mass transit shuttle linlcs,ride share matching, bilce facilities,transit initiatives, sha�ed bic�-cles, short-term ca�rentals, among others. Refer to pages 59 to 60 of the Draft EIR for a complete list of current TDM measures. While a higher non-single occupant vehicle (SOV)mode sha�e��ould be supported b�-the Cit�-of Cupertino,the measures needed to achieve such a higher mode sha�e could�-ield unacceptable consequences (including increased pa�lcing demand in residential neighborhoods acljacent to the project site). Thus the diversion rate achieved at Faceboolc or Stanford ma�-not be desirable at the project site,��hen��eighing competing interests. The Cit�-��eighed these competing concems in requiring achievement of the 34 percent goal. As pa�-t of the project,Apple��ould continue to implement, and further eipand,its TDM Program,��ith a mandatoi�-target to increase the altemative mode sha�e from 28 percent to 34 percent(i.e., a reduction in pealc hour trips of 6 percentage points). Counting the total number of"pealc hour vehicle trip counts"at each of the project drive��a�-s��ould help determine��hether Apple is meeting the required 34 percent target mode sha�e set b�-the Cit�-. Apple��ould provide supplemental information about the TDM Program being implemented and rate of use of the TDM measures. The project's TDM goal of 34 percent at full buildout has been identified as a reasonable target because it is considered relatively-aggressive but achievable for office developments in suburban locations greater than '/z mile from a rail station. To ensure that Apple achieves and maintains its targeted TDM pa�-ticipation rate,the Cit�-��ould require implementation of the monitoring program, described in the TDM Program Eipansion subsection of the Draft EIR(see pages 441-444)and in Master Response#9: Monitoring TDM Program. An�-failure to achieve 34 percent participation��ould result in P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 71 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES financial fines and penalties. The Cit�-��ould continue to��orlc��ith Apple to identi�-opportunities to minimize commutes b�-single occupanc5-vehicles, but believes the mitigation requuement is appropriate as a minimum threshold. Response B22-6: The Cit�-of Cupertino supports using TDM measures to reduce vehicle traffic in lieu of constructing intersection vehicle capacit5-improvements,in accordance��ith a TDM First strateg5-. To this end,the Cit�-has��orlced closel�-��ith Apple to identifi-a relatively-aggressive but achievable TDM pa�-ticipation rate of 34 percent. Ho��ever, a TDM Fust strateg5-ma5-be impractical or undesirable. For eiample,the comment suggests eipanding pa�lcing capacit5-only once all TDM measures ha�e been ezhausted. Because all parlcing«ould be provided either underground or in structures,it«ould be infeasible to retrofit the site design to acld parlcing if TDM measures prove to be insufficient. For that reason,the Cit�-has anal�-zed the pa�lcing proposed b�-Apple to ensure that it accommodates demand«ithout incentivizing the use of single occupancy motor vehicles. As discussed on pages 434 to 436 of the Draft EIR,the pa�lcing proposed for the site is based on a 34 percent TDM participation rate. Further, once the project is built and if the TDM measures do not achieve the needed vehicle trip reduction,it ma�-be infeasible for the Cit�-to require the project sponsor to construct the intersection improvements to reduce the impacts associated��ith lo��er-than- eipected TDM pa�ticipation. In this case,the significant road��a�-impacts ��ould remain unmitigated. For several significantl�-affected intersections, the level of TDM pa�-ticipation needed to achieve an acceptable level of operation«as determined to be infeasible—in most circumstances, requiring pa�-ticipation far in eicess of 65 percent. The Cit�-has balanced the need to ensure acceptable transportation conditions against identi�-ing an aggressive but achievable TDM pa�ticipation rate. The TDM program does not preclude the abilit�-of Apple to increase its implementation to higher levels in the future if deemed feasible. Response B22-7: This comment suggests that the trees proposed for removal as pa�-t of the project be relocated. As discussed on page 95 of the Draft EIR, of the 4,506 eiisting trees on the site at least 90 trees«ould be transplanted. In addition, 3,620 trees��ould be removed. The identification of trees appropriate for transplantation��as the result of several a�borist studies conducted on the project site, culminating in A Review of the Consolidated ANboNist RepoNt foN the Apple C'ampz�s 2 PNOject.' That document indicated general agreement on the trees proposed for transplant versus removal. Trees��ere rejected as candidates for transplant due to several reasons,including 1)poor health; 2) diminished potential to suivive a transplant; 3) conflicts��ith eiisting utilities; or 4) constraints associated��ith steep slopes and other eiisting site conditions. Furthermore, of the eiisting trees on the site, approiimatel�-75 i Bench,Michael L.,2013.A Revie��of the C'o�rso7idated ArboristReport for the App7e C'arixpzrs 2 Project.Ma��29. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 72 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES percent are non-native species. Of these non-native species,man�-individual trees a�e not suited to the climate or location of the area, and have��ater needs that eiceed those desired in the a�ea. Therefore,the transplantation of additional trees«ould not reduce the environmental impacts that«ould result from the project and«ould not be desuable from an environmental perspective. Response B22-8: As discussed on pages 130 to 133 of the Draft EIR,��hile the use of rec�-cled ��ater is not required as part of the project, Apple has designed into the project the abilit�-to use rec�-cled��ater in the cooling s5-stems and for limited indoor uses. Apple is also evaluating the use of rec�-cled��ater for ii7igation. The lilcelihood of eitending a rec5-cled��ater line to the project site ��as speculative��hen the Draft EIR��as being prepa�ed, but such an eitension is supported by Apple and the Cit�-.� In addition,the eitension of a rec�-cled��ater line into the project site��ould require approval of other jurisdictions in addition to the Cit�-of Cupertino. Response B22-9: As discussed on page 257,impacts related to the encroachment of develop- ment into the Calabazas Creelc coi7idor��ould be less than significant, as the buffer a�ound the creelc that��ould be provided as part of the project��ould aclequately protect the creek and its adjacent banlcs. In acldition, as described on page 196 of the Draft EIR,the 50-foot buffer��ould comply-��ith the basic creelc setbacic requirement established in the Santa Clara Valle�-Water Resources Protection Collaborative's Guidelines and Standa�ds for Land Use Near Streams. In the absence of Cit�-of Cupertino regulations for creelc buffers on private land,the eipansion of the buffer a�ound the creelc to 100 feet��ould not reduce an�-of the significant effects of the project,including those less-than-significant impacts on jurisdictional��aters and��ildlife coi7idors, because the creelc sui7oundings are cui7entl�-highly-urbanized. Furthermore,the project��ould increase the amount of peivious suifaces on- site,from approiimatel�-43 acres to 102 acres,��hich ma5-provide storm��ater qualit5-benefits,including to Calabazas Creelc. Response B22-10: This comment,��hich suggests that Apple add a store or museum to the project,is noted. This comment does not pertain to envuonmental issues sui7ounding the project and no further response is required. Response B22-1 L The types of public amenities identified in this comment(fencing,pedestrian seating, and public a�t) a�e al�ead�-incorporated into three mitigation measures in the Draft EIR Mitigation Measure PLAN-2��ould require the installation of"publicly-accessible amenities (e.g., bic5-cle racics, benches, 'On August 13,2013 the Sunnvvale Cin�Council approved the e�tension of a recvcled�vater line that�vould reach the project site.This e�tension is described on pages 130 to 133 of the Draft EIR.The approval of this recvcled��ater line, �vhich under�vent independent envu-onmental revie�v,does not change the impact findings in the Draft EIR related to�vater suppl� �uid dem�uid. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 7j LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES attractive pedestrian-oriented lighting, and landscaping) along the project site perimeter,"in addition to a coordinated«a�-finding scheme and landscaping along the North Wolfe Roacl bridge over I-280 that could enhance the aesthetic character of the project site perimeter. Mitigation Measure PLAN-3 ��ould requue aesthetic and functional improvements along an alternate creelc trail,pa�t of��hich��ould be acljacent to the boundaries of the project site. These improvements��ould include signage,plantings that reference Calabazas Creelc,pedestrian-scaled lighting,rest a�eas or picnic tables, pa�ement features that reference the creelc and/or��ater, and decorative fencing and guard rails. Response B22-12: This comment,��hich does not pertain to the adequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. Response B22-13: The comment suggests that the Cit�-ask or require that Apple not increase vehicle trips over eiisting or"baseline" conditions. This suggestion��ould be inconsistent��ith the objective of accommodating 14,200 employees. While the actual emplo5-ee capacit5-of the site toda�-is 9,800,for CEQA baseline purposes,the number of emplo5-ees��as assumed to be 4,844,��hich��as the estimated number of emplo5-ees��orlcing at the project site in August 2011, the date the Notice of Preparation��as issued (eiisting emplo5-ment on the site has diminished further since August 2011). At that point,He��lett- Packa�d��as departing the site, and Apple��as occupying only a portion of the site,in prepa�ation for the project. In acldition,most of those 4,844 emplo5-ees a�e eiisting Apple emplo5-ees,meaning that the5-alreacly have a compa�atively-lo�� trip generation due to the eiisting TDM Program. Achieving an increase of 9,356 employees��ithout increasing vehicle trips «ould not be feasible and«ould constrain emplo5-ment gro«-th at the project site. Please also refer to Master Response#12: Trip Cap. Response B22-14: The Cit�-does not ha�e a traffic impact fee. In lieu of imposing such a fee, the Cit�-requires major development projects to undergo CEQA revie��, and requires development project sponsors to fund improvements identif�ied as mitigation measures in CEQA revie�� documents. In this��ay,the Cit�- ensures that there is a neius bet��een project impacts and transportation improvement measures. Response B22-15: As discussed on page 156 of the Draft EIR,the Cit�-imposes a Housing Mitigation Fee on office,industrial,hotel,retail, and resea�ch and develop- ment uses that funds the development of affordable housing throughout the Cit�-. As part of the project,Apple��ould pa5-double the rate applicable to office and resea�ch and development projects in Planned Industrial, (P(MP), zoned a�eas. Response B22-16: This concluding comment is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 74 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER B23 Apple Inc. James C. Fowler,Associate General Counsel-Real Estate Dan Whisenhunt, Senior Director July 22,2013 Response B23-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response B23-2: This comment introduces a mitigation measure that is suggested to substitute for Mitigation Measure TRANS-23,��hich��ould require Apple to reduce the number of left-tum lanes at the Main Project Drive��a�-on North Wolfe Road from three to t��o. Response B23-3: This comment states that the Apple's proposal for tluee left-tum lanes eiiting the project site on to North Wolfe Roacl can be implemented��ithout creating the��ea�ing impact identified in Impact TRANS-23, and��ithout implement- ing Mitigation Measure TRANS-23,��hich��ould require reducing the number of left-tum lanes from three to t��o. The Draft EIR full�-anal�-zes the impacts of three left-tum lanes eiiting the project site on to North Wolf Road (see pages 414 to 418 of the Draft EIR), and concludes that the impacts on traffic operations��ould be less than significant but that a three-lane drive��a�-eiit design��ould ha�e a significant impact on safet�-due to "��ea�ing."Mitigation Measure TRANS-23,��hich requires the number of drive«a�-left-tum lanes to be reduced from three to t«o,«ould reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level(see pages 416 to 418 of the Draft EIR). The commenter states that the��ea�ing impact is unlilcel�-to occur for the reasons stated in the comment, and that the follo��ing measures also��ould reduce the��eaving impact to a less-than-significant level��ithout requuing a reduction to t��o lanes: (i)installing clea�signage at the eiit approach, including overhead signs,painted duections on lanes and appropriate lane striping, (ii)intemal employee education; and (iii)traffic monitors. The commenter proposes that these measures be implemented for a nine- month period during«hich the drive«a�-eiit«ould be monitored b�-an independent observer at the eipense of the project sponsor. If the��eaving behavior predicted in the Draft EIR is obseived,the third lane«ould be closed. In response to this comment, Cit�-staff and Cit�-consultants evaluated the commenter's proposal,and the Cit�-has concluded that the follo��ing altemative mitigation measure��ould reduce the impact to a less-than- significant level in lieu of reducing the proposed drive��a�-eiit to t��o lanes. In order to fu11�-evaluate the effectiveness of the measure and to consider an�- aclditional design refinements that might be«ai7anted, the measure«ould be implemented on a nine-month trial basis. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 75 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Page 418 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Imnact TRANS-23: Based on City of Cupertino standards,the design of the project with three left-turn lanes on the Wolfe Road driveway approach would cause a substantial increase in conflicts due to vehicles weaving on Wolfe Road between the driveway and the I-280 ramps in order to merge and align into the correct lanes to enter the freeway upon exiting the campus. (S) Implementation of one of the follo��in�t��o miti�ation measures ��ould reduce this impact to a less-than-si�nificant level: Miti�ation Measure TRANS-23: At the main project drive��a�-on Wolfe Road,the project sponsor shall reduce the number of left tum lanes from three to t��o. This��ould reduce the��ea�ing on southbound Wolfe Road bet��een the drive��a�-and the I-280 northbound on-ramp since there«ould be, at most, a one-lane lane change in order for drivers to align themselves to the coi7ect lane. (LTS) OR Miti�ation Measure TRANS-23 (Alternate): The project sponsor shall be permitted to construct tluee left-turn eiit lanes from the pro�ject site to Wolfe Road if all of the follo��in�measures a�e implemented: • Clea�signa�e,includin� but not limited to overheacl si�ns, shall be installed to indicate the destination of each of the tluee eiit lanes in order to discoura�e unsafe lane changes. • Each lane on Wolfe Roacl, bet«een the drive«a�-and Prunerid�e Avenue, shall be clea�l�-marlced b�painted stripes, directional a�ro«s, and destination le�ends to indicate the destination of each lane and to indicate b�-double lines or other a�propriate ma�lcin�s that changin�lanes is a violation of la��. • The project sponsor shall fund the follo��in�measures for a trial period of nine months from issuance of the first certificate of occupancv for the Main Buildin�and shall install closed-cucuit video cameras linlced to the Cit�-'s Traf£ic Operations Center to continuousl�-record vehicle movements at the pro�ject drive��a� and alon� southbound Wolfe Road. Trained personnel,��ho are independent from the project sponsor, shall periodicall�-revie�� the video foota�e at the direction of the Cit�-, and provide a report at the end of each month to the Public Works Department. This report shall document anv unsafe or ille�al lane changes (violations) obseived,noting accidents caused b�-violations and P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 76 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES notin��hether,in the professional jud�ment of the independent obseiver,the obseived violations constitute a safet�problem that should be addressed and,if so,recommendin�measures to acldress them. • If, at anv time follo��in�the nine-month trial period implementation of the measures listed above do not substantiall� prevent violations,in the professional opinion of the independent obseiver and the Citv,the Citv shall determine��hether additional measures a�e rec�uired, or��hether the number of lanes must be reduced to t��o eiit lanes. Monitorin� shall continue until nine months follo��in�full occupancv of the project. • A penalt�-of$500 per violation durin�the PM 2-hour pealc period per da�-shall be paid b�-the pro�ject sponsor to the Cit� The number of violations shall be determined b�-the independent obseiver based upon revie« of the video foo e and eitrapolated to account for dail�-activit�-durin�the PM 2-hour pealc period should dailv video foota�e not be revie«ed. • The project sponsor shall develop emplo�-ee education materials, to the satisfaction of the Cit�-, eiplainin�the proper use of the drive��av eiit lanes��ithout��eavin� amon�lanes. (LTS) Response B23-4: This comment,��hich states support for the finding in the Draft EIR that the provision of three left-turn lanes��ould not result in significant vehicle dela�-s on North Wolfe Roacl,is noted. See Response B23-3. Response B23-5: This concluding comment is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 77 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES C. INDI VIDUAL S P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 7g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C1 Tappan (Tap) Merrick June 21,2013 Response C1-L This comment does not pertain to the environmental anal�-sis in the Draft EIR It has been foi1�arded to the Cit�-of Cupertino planner assigned to the Cupertino Village project. COMMENTER C2 Ronald Joseph Moore, Sr. July 21,2013 Response C2-L This comment generally-pertains to the merits of the project. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The commenter notes that"It is reasonable to assume that Apple��il1 consolidate the scattered employees into the ne�� Campus, and some Traffic��i11 on1�-change places and not increase."This concept is discussed in Chapter III,Project Description, and throughout the Draft EIR. As discussed on page 92 of the Draft EIR, "The net increase of ne�� emplo5-ees assumed for the purpose of this EIR(9,356) ma�-over-estimate the number of net ne�� emplo5-ees in the project a�ea because it is not certain ho�� man�-ne�� employees��ould be eiisting Apple emplo5-ees cui7entl�-��orlcing outside the project site or ne�� emplo5-ees that do not cui7entl�-��orlc for Apple in the vicinit�-of the project site. The proposed project is intended to consolidate cui7ent and ne�� Apple emplo5-ees. Therefore,it is lilcel�-that the net increase of emplo5-ees that ��ould resultfrom the project��ould be less than 9,356. Ho��ever,the full potential net increase is used in this EIR to allo�� for a cautious environmen- tal anal�-sis that does not under-estimate potential impacts of the project." COMMENTER C3 Keithdd1527@aol.com July 18,2013 Response C3-L This comment does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR for the proposed project and is noted. The comment pertains to the approval of a tempora��-structure, a project distinct from the proposed Apple Campus 2 Project,��hich��as approved aclministrativel�-��ith a Tempora��-Use Permit, as allo��ed b�-the Cit�-'s Municipal Code.No special eiceptions��ere granted. The Santa Clara Valle�-Water District contact for the tempora��- structure��as Usha Chat��ani and the Temporai�-Use Permit application number is TUP-2013-03. Response C3-2: This comment consists of photographs of the tempora��-structure approved on the site,is not related to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR, and is noted. As P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 7g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES noted above,the project is being undertalcen in accordance��ith the Cit�-of Cupertino Municipal Code. COMMENTER C4 Gary Beaupre July 15,2013 Response C4-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits rega�ding the size of the project, and its evaluation in the conteit of significance criteria established b�-the Cit�-. As described in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation,the project��ould result in significant unavoidable impacts to the operations of the intersection of I-280/Wolfe Road. Please refer to Impacts TRANS-1, TRANS-5, TRANS-14, TRANS-25, TRANS-26, and TRANS-29 in Section V.I of the Draft EIR. Response C4-2: The specif�ic free��a�-ramps identified in this comment��ere evaluated to determine if the�-��ould be substantiall�-affected b5-project traffic. Please refer to Figure V.I-8, Eiisting Plus Project Intersection Level of Seivice (LOS) Results, on page 392 of the Draft EIR,��hich indicates the amount of dela�-eipected on these free��a�-ramps due to the introduction of traffic associated��ith the proposed project. Response C4-3: Please see Response to Comments C4-1 and C4-2. Response C4-4: Please see Response to Comments C4-1. As discussed on pages 211 to 212 of the Draft EIR,the project is not eipected to result in signif�icant aclverse effects on communit�-cha�acter(including the communit�-cha�acter of Sunn�,-vale) due to the amount of open space on the project site;the clustering of most buildings a��ay from the periphei�-of the site;the preservation of trees and the eitension of berms along the site perimeter; and the provision of an inconspicuous and visually-permeable fence along the edge of the site. As sho��n in Figures V.B-5 and V.B-7 of the Draft EIR,visual simulations from locations north of East Homestead Roacl indicate that project buildings «ould be almost«ho11�-obscured b�-vegetation and landscape features. Response C4-5: Please see the previous responses to this letter, above. COMMENTER CS Stan (Last name not pNOVided) July 11,2013 Response CS-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits rega�ding the size of the project, and its evaluation in the conteit of significance criteria established b�-the Cit�-. As discussed on pages 440 to 441 of the Draft EIR,project construction traffic��ould use on1�-designated trucic routes��ithin the P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES vicinit�-of the project site, and most construction trucic traffic��ould occur during off-pealc hours. With the eiception of the segment of Pruneridge Avenue bet��een The Hamptons and North Tantau Avenue(��hich��ould be closed as part of the project)no roacl closures��ould occur during the construction period. Ho«ever,tempora��-traffic diversion ma�-be needed to facilitate relocation of utilities on North Wolfe Road and East Homesteacl Road, and street��idening on North Wolfe Road during construction of the project. Response CS-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits regarding the size of the project, and its evaluation in the conteit of significance criteria established bv the Citv. Response CS-3: This comment about preserving and reusing the eiisting buildings on the site does not pertain to the adequacy of the Draft EIR and is noted. That option ��as eiplored as part of the No Project altemative, discussed on pages 599 to 605 of the Draft EIR. Response CS-4: Impacts related to tree removal are discussed on pages 210 to 211 of the Draft EIR(Aesthetics section) and 261 of the Draft EIR(Biological Resources section). Although the removal of the former HP Campus red��ood grove��ould change the visual cha�acter of the site,this change «ould not be considered significant and aclverse because: those trees are located��ithin the interior of the site and are not vei�-visible from public vie��points;tree coverage around the perimeter of the project site��ould be la�gely-maintained; and trees removed from the site«ould be replaced«ith at least 6,200 trees intended to reference the site's native vegetation and agricultural past(a net increase of 2,494 trees). These ne�� trees��ould enhance the visual qualit5-of the site. Response CS-5: The on1�-roacl that��ould be closed during the project��ould be the segment of Pruneridge Avenue bet��een The Hamptons and North Tantau Avenue. Ho«ever,temporai�-traffic diversion ma�-be needed to facilitate relocation of utilities on North Wolfe Roacl and East Homesteacl Roacl, and street ��idening on North Wolfe Roacl during construction of the project. Response CS-6: The closure of Pruneridge Avenue is discussed throughout the Draft EIR, but see in pa�-ticular pages 150 to 152; 156 to 159; and 427 to 430. Response CS-7: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits regarding the size of the project, and its evaluation in the conteit of significance criteria established bv the Citv. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g 1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C6 Sandra and Don Boren July 8,2013 Response C6-L This comment,��hich discusses the merits of potential additional bic�-clists in the area and the use of shuttles for transit, but does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR, is noted.Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C7 Russ Robinson July 8,2013 Response C7-L This comment,��hich pertains to the merits of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR, is noted.Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C8 Ann (Last name not pNOVided) July 2,2013 Response C8-L This comment notes generally-that the project��ould increase traffic in the a�ea and increase occupancy of the site be�-ond eiisting levels. This comment is consistent��ith the anal�-sis in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR. Response C8-2: Please note that the retention of Pruneridge Avenue as a public right-of-��a�- ��as anal�-zed as a project altemative(the Pruneridge Avenue alternative), ��hich is discussed on pages 605 to 612 of the Draft EIR The closure of Pruneridge Avenue is discussed throughout the Draft EIR, but see in pa�-ticular pages 150 to 152; 156 to 159; and 427 to 430. Response C8-3: As discussed on pages 552 to 559 of the Draft EIR, site-specific construction and operational health rislc modeling��as peiformed for the project and results indicate that a significant risk«ould not occur to nea�b�-residents or other sensitive receptors a�ound the project site (including students at local schools). Wind pattems indicate that dispersion of emissions��ould occur to the east and southeast of the project site, a��a�-from Cupertino High School and La«son Middle School. Response C8-4: See Master Response#15: School Busing Program. As a clarification, oral comments on the Draft EIR��ere accepted at the public meeting for the project on June 26, 2013. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g2 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C8-5: This comment,��hich states that the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale��ill hold a stud�- session on the Draft EIR,is noted. Response C8-6: This comment on the merits of the project is noted. As discussed on pages 581 to 584 of the Draft EIR,the project��ould result in less-than-significant impacts related to school enrollment(and the need for ne�� capital school facilities). Therefore,no mitigation��ould be required to reduce impacts on schools. COMMENTER C9 Rich Altmaier July 1,2013 Response C9-L This comment,��hich generally-pertains to the merits of the project, and not the adequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. The Draft EIR identifies eitensive mitigation measures for the transportation-related effects of the project, including a robust TDM Program,��hich��ould require the diversion of 34 percent of project trips into non-single-occupant vehicles. Eiisting and proposed TDM measures, as discussed on pages 441 to 443 of the Draft EIR, «ould incentivize and encourage the use of public transit and bic�-cles b�- Apple employees. COMMENTER C10 Rick Haffner July 1,2013 Response C10-L The Draft EIR identifies several free��a�-/eipress��a5-access eipansions or changes that��ould be required as mitigation measures. See in particula� Mitigation Measures TRANS-1,TRANS-3, TRANS-5, TRANS-9a, TRANS- 10, TRANS-11, TRANS-14, TRANS-19a, TRANS-20, TRANS-21, TRANS-22, TRANS-25, and TRANS-26. The transportation analy-sis is a major component of the Draft EIR, and careful consideration��as given to all feasible mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of the project on the road«a�-s�-stem. Please refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Cuculation for a discussion of the impacts of the project on all modes of transportation, and recommended mitigation measures. As part of the environmental documentation prepared for the Main Street Project,mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts«ere identif�ied. In acldition,the Main Street Project��as incorporated into the Bacicground scenario for the Apple Campus 2 Project,��hich��as anal�-zed in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g j LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C11 William F. Bailey Tap Merrick June 30,2013 Response C11-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C11-2: This comment,��hich eipresses support for the closure of Pruneridge Avenue��ithin the project site,is noted. The retention of Pruneridge Avenue as a public right-of-��a�-��as anal�-zed as a proj ect altemative (the Pruneridge Avenue alternative),��hich is discussed on pages 605 to 612 of the Draft EIR. Response C11-3: This comment provides the commenter's summa��-of the public meeting held on the Draft EIR on June 26,2013 and identif�ied the��a�-s in��hich comments on the Draft EIR could be submitted for consideration. Please also see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C11-4: This comment is noted. While the Draft EIR used background information provided b�-Apple (e.g., site plans and technical reports,��hich��ere peer revie��ed b�-the EIR consultant),the Cit�-is the lead agenc5-for this EIR and has revie«ed and eiercised its independent judgment over all materials submitted to the Cit�-in prepa�ing the EIR. See CEQA Section 21082.1(b). The fiscal impact analysis prepared for the project prima�ily focuses on revenue that«ould be generated b�-the project, and costs to the Cit�- associated��ith the project. The Draft EIR is the coi7ect document to revie�� for information on the potential phy-sical impacts of the project,including impacts to neighborhoods a�ound the project site. Response C11-5: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. Response C11-6: Sui7ounding local jurisdictions��ere contacted for an updated list of approved and pending projects to be included in the transportation anal�-sis. Several of the projects noted in the comment��ere not included in the lists provided b�-the respective agencies and therefore«ere not included in the anal�-sis. The transportation evaluation is required to include reasonabl�- foreseeable projects as lcno��n at the time of publication of the Notice or Prepa�ation (August 2011). It is assumed that these projects��ere not reasonabl�-foreseeable at that time. The projects identified in the comment that��ere not included in the anal�-sis in the Draft EIR a�e located further a«a�-from the project stud5-a�ea and«ould add a negligible amount of traffic to the stud�-intersections. Response C11-7: This comment,��hich encourages project site neighbors to submit comments on the Draft EIR,is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g4 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C12 Keith Murphy June 28,2013 Response C12-L This comment requests information on ho�� data on major development projects in the Cit�-a�e macle a�ailable to the public. The Cit�-establishes stand-alone��ebpages for larger development projects,including the Main Street Project and the Apple Campus 2 Project. While the Cit�-uses its discretion in determining«hich projects«ai7ant an independent«ebpage,it strives to malce the planning process transparent to the public. All approval documents on smaller projects a�e placed online��ithin t��o da�-s of approval at: ��.cupertino.or�/records in the Planning Depa�-tment folder. Information rega�ding the Apple Campus 2 Project is macle a�ailable online at: ��.cupertino.org/applecampus2. In acldition, because the Apple Campus 2 Project has been designated an Environmental Leaclership Development Project pursuant to AB 900 under Section 21178 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code,the Cit�-has made the aclministrative record for the project available at the«ebsite noted above. The rest of the comment does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR and a response is not required. COMMENTER C13 Yolanda Reynolds June 26,2013 Response C13-L This comment states thatthe project��ould eiacerbate traf£ic congestion and air pollution in the area. These issues are discussed in detail in Sections V.I, Transportation and Cuculation, and V.L, Air Quality,of the Draft EIR. Response C13-2: East Homestead Road,��hich is located immediatel�-to the north of the project site,��ould remain open��ith implementation of the proposed project. As indicated on page 400 of the Draft EIR,t��o stud�-intersections along Homesteacl Roacl«ould be substantiall�-aclversel�-affected«ith implementa- tion of the proposed project: Intersection#5 (De Anza Bouleva�d and Homesteacl Road) and Intersection#27 (Tantau Avenue and Homestead Road). These intersections«ould also be substantiall�-adversel�-affected under cumulative plus project conditions, as indicated on page 410 of the Draft EIR. Under cumulative conditions,the average increase in dela�- caused b�-the project at these t«o intersections«ould range from 4 seconds at Intersection#5 to approiimatel�-38 seconds at Intersection#27. Even though dela5-«ould increase at these intersections,Homestead Road«ould continue to be accessible to drivers, and a potential altemate route for certain segments of I-280. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g5 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C13-3: Please refer to Response 13-2 and Master Response#2: Project Merits. In acldition,the closure of Pruneridge Avenue is discussed tluoughout the Draft EIR, but see in pa�-ticula�pages 150 to 152; 156 to 159; and 427 to 430. COMMENTER C14 Jia and Linda June 21,2013 Response C14-L Implementation of the project��ould result in the removal of a maiimum of 3,620 trees from the project site. As discussed on page 95 of the Draft EIR, ��ith implementation ofthe project, aminimum of 800 trees��ould be retained in place on the project site (including the majorit5-of the site perimeter trees and trees along the Calabazas Creelc ripa�ian coi7idor), and a minimum of 90 mature trees��ould be transplanted from the interior of the site to either the perimeter or to specific locations in the interior of the site. In order to mitigate the tree removals in accordance��ith the Cit�-'s Protected Tree Ordinance and to increase vegetation at the site,Apple proposes to plant a minimum of 6,200 ne�� trees on the project site,resulting in a net increase of 2,494 trees. COMMENTER C15 Gina Wang June 20,2013 Response C15-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C15-2: This comment,��hich references historic levels of congestion on I-280 and states support for Apple's "plans to improve local roacl��a�-s and altemative options for emplo5-ee transit,"is noted. Response C15-3: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C16 Donna Austin June 19,2013 Response C16-L This comment generally-pertains to the merits of the project and is noted. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The statement about the commenter's confidence that Apple��ill mitigate the traffic impacts of the project is also noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g6 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C17 Bernard Wood June 18,2013 Response C17-L The retention of Pruneridge Avenue as a public right-of-��a�-��as anal�-zed as a project altemative (the Pruneridge Avenue altemative),��hich is discussed on pages 605 to 612 of the Draft EIR. As discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR,t��o aclditional altematives allo��ing for public access across the site(a Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative and a Mobilit�-and Parlc alternative) «ere rejected from detailed anal�-sis because the�-«ould inteifere«ith major utilit�-lines,��ould infringe on private propert5-,result in aclverse visual impacts,��ould incur significant costs, and/or��ould still pose significant securit�-concerns. See also Response to Comment B3-22. COMMENTER C18 Earl Sharkey June 17,2013 Response C18-L This comment references Apple's eiisting TDM program,��hich is discussed on pages 59 to 60 of the Draft EIR. Response C18-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C19 Judy Gaffney June 17,2013 Response C19-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The comment regarding environmental issues associated��ith the use of the project site for the former HP campus is noted. COMMENTER C20 Shaunak June 15,2013 Response C20-L This comment generally-pertains to the merits of the project. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The��ater feature suggested in the comment is noted. As part of the project,a«ater feature«ould be developed in the court�-a�d of the Main Building that��ould also seive as a rain��ater capture device. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g7 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C21 Dolly Sandoval June 14,2013 Response C21-L This comment,��hich eipresses general support for the project,is noted. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C21-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits for a discussion of the treatment of project socioeconomic effects under CEQA. The comment eipressing support for the design of the project and the project's environmental features is noted. Response C21-3: Traf£ic impacts associated��ith the project, and identified mitigation measures to reduce these impacts, a�e discussed in Section V.I, Transporta- tion and Circulation,of the Draft EIR. Response C21-4: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C22 Henry and Sally Zoellner June 13,2013 Response C22-L The retention of Pruneridge Avenue as a public right-of-��a�-��as anal�-zed as a project altemative (the Pruneridge Avenue altemative),��hich is discussed on pages 605 to 612 of the Draft EIR. As discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR,t��o aclditional altematives allo��ing for public access across the site(a Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative and a Mobilit�-and Parlc alternative) «ere rejected from detailed anal�-sis because the�-«ould inteifere«ith major utilit�-lines,��ould infringe on private propert5-,result in aclverse visual impacts,��ould incur significant costs, and/or��ould still pose significant securit�-concerns. See also Response to Comment B3-22. Response C22-2: The request to annei the West��ood Oalcs neighborhood into Cupertino is noted. This comment does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR and no further response is required. COMMENTER C23 Vanya Matzek June 13,2013 Response C23-L The project��ould not include access through the project site connecting North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue. Ho��ever, as discussed on pages 111 to 120 of the Draft EIR,the project includes eitensive changes to the bilce and pedestrian environment sui7ounding the project site(including along Vallco Pa�lc��a5-)that��ould allo�� continuous bilce and pedestrian P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L gg LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES access (via side��allcs and bilce lanes) along East Homestead Road,North Tantau Avenue, Vallco Pa�lc��ay, and North Wolfe Roacl in the vicinit�-of the project site. These facilities��ould complete the"loop"referenced in the comment, but over a greater length compa�ed to the "loop"under eiisting conditions. In addition,mitigation measures in the Draft EIR«ould also enhance bilce and pedestrian facilities in the area. Mitigation Measure PLAN- 2 and Mitigation Measure PLAN-3 ��ould requue Apple to implement aclditional bilce and pedestrian facilit�-improvements,including a coordinated ��a�-finding scheme a�ound the project site perimeter, enhanced bilce lanes and pedestrian paths along the North Wolfe Road bridge over I-280, other bic�-cle and pedestrian amenities, ADA improvements, and an altemate Calabazas Creelc trail segment. Also, Mitigation Measures TRANS-23, TRANS-28, TRANS-29��ould requue enhancements to the pedestrian environment at the North Wolfe Roacl/Project Access intersection and at the I-280 ramps��ith Wolfe Road. COMMENTER C24 Darcy Paul June 12,2013 Response C24-L This comment generally-focuses on the"many-positive impacts"of the project, but also supports "appropriate measures talcen to ensure that congestion and the impacts of traffic a�e minimized and even eliminated." Ca�eful consideration��as given to all feasible mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of the project on the road��a�-s�-stem. Please refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation for a discussion of the impacts of the project on all modes of transportation, and recommended mitigation measures. COMMENTER C25 Keith Warner June 12,2013 Response C25-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits,including the discussion of the treatment of socioeconomic effects in CEQA documents. COMMENTER C26 James Forsythe June 11,2013 Response C26-L This comment generally-pertains to the merits of the project. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The comment also notes that shifting the��orlc hours of Apple emplo5-ees a��a�-from pealc periods could reduce project traffic impacts. This concept is emplo5-ed in the list of"Additional TDM Measures"discussed on page 443. These measures,��hich include the P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L gg LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES implementation of a fleiible��ork schedule and the encouragement of telecommuting,«ould be implemented if the TDM measures identified as pa�-t of the project fail to meet the pealc hour counts goal established in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b. COMMENTER C27 Glenn Grigg June 10,2013 Response C27-L This comment notes that the intersection of North Tantau Avenue/Pruneridge Avenue«ould be a good candidate for a roundabout.Ho«ever,it is not part of the project,is not included in an�-CitS-plans, and is not required to reduce the significant effects of the project. Therefore, a roundabout is not being considered at this location. Response C27-2: The Main Parlcing Structure acljacent to I-280 is designed to have direct access to both North Wolfe Roacl and Tantau Avenue. COMMENTER C28 Yaeko Hirotsuka June 8,2013 Response C28-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C28-2: This comment,��hich does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. Please see Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure for aclditional information about the effect of the Pruneridge Avenue closure on local roacl��a�-traffic volumes. Response C28-3: As discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR,t��o alternatives allo��ing for public access across the site(a Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel alternative and a Mobilit�-and Pa�lc altemative)«ere rejected from detailed anal�-sis because the�-��ould inteifere��ith maj or utility lines,��ould infringe on private propert5-,result in adverse visual impacts,��ould incur significant costs, and/or��ould still pose significant securit�-concerns. Ho��ever,the No Project altemative and the Pruneridge Avenue altemative, discussed in Chapter VI, Altematives,��ould retain public access across the project site. See also Response to Comment B3-22. Response C28-4: This comment,��hich pertains to the merits of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C29 Yaeko Hirotsuka June 8,2013 Response C29-1: Please see Responses to Comments C28-1 through C28-4. COMMENTER C30 Eddie Kuo June 6,2013 Response C30-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The environmental implications of the sustainabilit�-features referenced in the comment are eiplored throughout the Draft EIR, but specificall�-in Section V.K, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sustainabilitv. COMMENTER C31 Eno Schmidt June 6,2013 Response C31-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The comment about the "advance consideration"of issues "involving congestion and concentrations of such la�ge number of emplo5-ees in one location"is noted, but no aclditional response is required. This comment does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR. COMMENTER C32 Margaret Reilly June 5,2013 Response C32-L This comment,��hich pertains to the provision of Cit�--��ide WiFi as pa�t of the project and not to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER C33 Chandramohan Mathu June 6,2013 Response C33-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g 1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C34 Best/Yash (Fz�ll name not pNOVided) June 6,2013 Response C34-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C35 Geoff Paulsen July 22,2013 Response C35-L The anal�-sis in the Draft EIR evaluates environmental conditions fa�into the future,��here applicable(in the case ofthe demographic analysis in Section V.G,Population, Employment, and Housing,housing and employment gro��th in the Cit�-and Count�-a�e evaluated out to 2035). In addition, although the focus of the anal�-sis is on the environs of the project,impacts a�e eiamined for a�eas outside the bounda�ies of Cupertino,including regional roacl��a�-s. The comment rega�ding the desire for a taller project is noted. Such a design«as not considered as pa�-t of a project alternative because it«ould not reduce the impacts of the project, as required b5-CEQA, and could eiacerbate the potential impacts of the project if a taller building «ould degrade vie«sheds in the a�ea. Response C35-2: This comment,��hich suggests that Apple add a store,museum, or visitor center to the project,is noted. This comment does not pertain to environmen- tal issues sui7ounding the project or the adequac5-of the Draft EIR and no further response is required. Response C35-3: Mitigation Measure PLAN-3 includes a requuement that Apple fund a stud�- of a Class I trail along the drainage channel and Calabazas Creelc channel south of the project site (instead of constructing such a trail). The high cost of developing such a trail��ould malce it infeasible for a single project to support. In acldition,no trail eiists today, so the project«ould not ha�e a significant impact on the eiisting envuonment��ith respect to trails. Please see Master Response#13: Calabazas Creelc Trail. Response C35-4: This comment is noted and��i11 be considered in the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3. Response C35-5: The storm��ater control methods mentioned in the comment��ould be required as pa�t of the project,pursuant to the provisions of the San Francisco Ba�- Region Municipal Storm��ater National Pollutant Discha�ge Elimination S�-stem Permit, as described on pages 307 to 308 of the Draft EIR It should also be noted that the project��ould benefit storm��ater qualit5-because the amount of pervious surfaces on the site��ould increase from approiimatel�-43 acres to 102 acres. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g2 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C35-6: This comment,��hich generally-eipresses an opposition to road��idening,is noted. As a general response,the Draft EIR includes mitigation measures that seek to reduce the transportation impacts of the project��ithout��idening roads. For instance, Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b��ould require Apple to divert 34 percent of its pealc hour trips using a range of TDM measures, including increased transit usage and incentivizing bilcing and��alking commutes. Response C35-7: Occupied project buildings��ould a�erage approiimatel�-240 squa�e feet per employee,��hich is a fairl�-typical employee densit�-for technology-related office uses. Response C35-8: As described on page 626 of the Draft EIR, a Mobilit�-and Pa�lc alternative («hich«ould include a 1.1-acre on-site parlc)«as rejected from detailed anal�-sis in the Draft EIR because it��ould pose significant securit�-concerns to Apple and��ould conflict��ith alce5-project objective. COMMENTER C36 Neighbor July 22,2013 Response C36-1: Please see Master Response: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Closure. The segment of Pruneridge Avenue east of North Tantau Avenue is not eipected to eiperience high traffic volumes such that closure of the street��ould be «a�ranted. COMMENTER C37 Dean Fujiwara July 22,2013 Response C37-1: Please refer to Response to Comment A1-14. The intersection at Homestead Road/Heron Avenue is a signalized intersection that provides protected left- tum access to and from the Sei7a Ga�dens neighborhood (thus facilitating access onto Homesteacl Roacl after project implementation). The Homesteacl Road/Linnet Lane intersection is a side-street stop controlled intersection, ��here traffic to/from Linnet Lane needs to�-ield to traffic on Homestead Road (thus increased traf£ic on Homesteacl Roacl could increase the difficult�- of turns from Linnet Lane). The proposed development projects,including the Apple Campus 2 Project as��e11 as the shopping centers at Cupertino Village and Homestead Squa�e,«ould increase traffic volumes on Homesteacl Roacl. Ho��ever, as discussed in Response to Comment A1-14, the intersections��ould continue to operate acceptably. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 9J LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C38 Ken Nishimura July 22,2013 Response C38-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C38-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C38-3: The comment is coi7ect that the closure of Pruneridge Avenue��ould ha�e significant effects on bic�-cling and pedestrian infrastructure in the area and that the project��ould generate significant traffic congestion. These impacts a�e identified as signif�icant and una�oidable in the Draft EIR. See the summai�-of signif�icant and una�oidable project impacts on pages 6 to 7 of the Draft EIR. Response C38-4: The shuttle service suggested by the commenter��as not identified as a mitigation measure due to: 1)the relativel�-lo« numbers of pedestrians and c�-clists that use the segment of Pruneridge Avenue��ithin the project site that��ould be vacated; 2)the relativel�-short length of the pedestrian detour that��ould be required due to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue; 3)the relativel�-high cost of running such a shuttle seivice at a frequenc5-that «ould be convenient to pedestrians; and 4)the adverse effects on au pollution and traffic congestion associated��ith such a shuttle seivice. Response C38-5: The project��ould include substantial transportation improvements, as described on pages 381 to 384 of the Draft EIR,��hich��ould add road��a�- capacit5-to reduce the amount of traffic congestion that could occur. In acldition, Apple��ould eipand its TDM Program (including its dedicated shuttle bus seivice)and (per Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b)increase the percentage of emplo5-ees��ho use transit,��alking, bic5-cling, and shared ride modes of transport to and from��orlc from 28 percent to 34 percent to reduce the amount of added traf£ic congestion. The transportation impact analy-sis evaluated project impacts to free��a�- interchanges. Specif�icall�-I-280/Wolfe Road free��a�-ramp operations��ere evaluated and off-ramp«idenings«ere identified as mitigation measures. Mitigation measures��ere also identified for the intersection of the I-280 northbound off-ramp at Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d. Response C38-6: Please see Master Response#1: Signif�icant and Una�oidable Impacts. Response C38-7: The eiit intersection of the campus transit station��ould be signalized to facilitate effective operations at this location, and to ensure safet�-of bic�-clists. With signalization this intersection is projected to operate at LOS A and LOS B during the AM and PM pealc periods,respectively. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 94 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C38-8: The eiisting altemative mode use of 28 percent��as measured on da�-s��ith good��eather. Therefore the goal of 34 percent should also be measured on da�-s«ith good«eather to provide a consistent comparison. On da�-s«ith inclement��eather some emplo5-ees��ho typically-use altemative modes ma�- elect to drive to«ork. This«ould not represent"normal"travel pattems and ��ould potentiall�-slce�� the results. Response C38-9: Please see Master Response: Adequac5-of TDM Penalties. Response C38-10: Please see Master Response#12: Trip Cap. Response C38-1 L The project drive��a�-s��ould be controlled��ith traf£ic signals that a�e operated b5-the City of Cupertino Public Worlcs Department. The signals ��ould be operated in conjunction��ith other traf£ic signals on North Wolfe Road and North Tantau Avenue so that traffic flo��s on the a�terials a�e maintained. This��ould require longer��ait times for vehicles on the side streets,including the project drive��a�-s. Therefore traffic eiiting the site ��ould effectivel�-be metered. Response C38-12: Apple shuttles a�e o��ned and operated b�-thud pa�t5-operators��ho fuel all vehicles off-site. Response C38-13: This comment,��hich eipresses support for the Reduced Densit�-alternative evaluated in Chapter VI, Altematives, of the Draft EIR is noted. COMMENTER C39 Patricia Melcic July 22,2013 Response C39-L This comment references Impacts AIR-1 and AIR-2,��hich relate to the violation of air qualit5-standards. These impacts pertain to eiceedances of established thresholds of air pollutants in the air basin and«ould not disproportionatel�-affect persons��ithin 1 mile of the project site. As calculated in the air qualit5-technical stud5-prepared for the Draft EIR, emissions of toiic air contaminants from construction��ould be less than significant for nea�b�-residents. Response C39-2: Although level of service dela�-s in the Draft EIR are calculated in seconds of delay(and not miles),this comment lilcel�-overstates the project's contribu- tion to free«a�-congestion. Under cumulative conditions,the project«ould acld approiimatel�- 1 minute and 23 seconds of dela�-to operations at the Wolfe Roacl/I-280 Northbound Ramps and 1 minute and 8 seconds of dela�- to the La��rence Eipress��a5-/I-280 Southbound Ramps. Response C39-3: The intersection of Pruneridge Avenue/North Tantau Avenue��as anal�-zed in Section V.I, Transportation and Cuculation, of the Draft EIR This P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g5 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES intersection is not listed in Table II-1, Summa��-of Impacts and Mitigation Measures,from the EIR, because its operations��ould not be substantiall�- aclversel�-affected b�-the project. Response C39-4: The Main Pa�lcing Structure entrance��ould ha�e direct access both to North Tantau Avenue and North Wolfe Road, and associated traffic«ould be distributed to the t��o streets. Response C39-5: Table RTC-6 summarizes the pealc hour road��a�-volumes for Pruneridge Avenue bet��een La��rence Eipress��a5-and Tantau Avenue for Eiisting, Bacicground No Project, and Bacicground Plus Project conditions and their corresponding levels of seivice. Pruneridge Avenue is classified as a minor arterial per the Cit�-of Santa Clara 2010-2035 General Plan. Based on the General Plan, an a�terial can accommodate up to 885 vehicles per lane and maintain LOS D operations. Pruneridge Avenue has t��o lanes bet��een La��rence Eipress��a5-and Tantau Avenue and a total capacit5-of 1,770 pealc hour vehicles (885 i 2lanes). Based on the data presented in Table RTC-6,Pruneridge Avenue has sufficient capacit5-to accommodate the eipected gro��th in traffic on the road«a�. Table RTC-6: Prunerid6e Avenue Peak Hour Roadwa Volumes T��o-W a�- Scenario Peak Houri Road�a��Volume LOS� E�isting AM 707 C PM 883 C Bacl.ground No Project AM 733 C PM )31 C Bacl.ground Plus Froject AM 939 C PM 1.13� D Notes: i AM=morning pealc hour,PM=afternoon pealc hour. - Based onRoadl�a}•Se�rnentDail}•LOSDefinitiaizs presented ul Santa Clara's General Plan.Peak hour capacities��ere assuined to be ten percent of the dail�•capacit�. Source:Fehr&Peers,August 2013. Response C39-6: The modest additional traffic volumes for the project that��ould occur on Pruneridge Avenue, as sho��n in Response to Comment C39-5,��ould not be eipected to create haza�dous conditions for bic�-clists and pedestrians. COMMENTER C40 Jennifer Hodor July 22,2013 Response C40-L This introductoi�-comment stating objections to the proposed project is noted. As discussed in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g6 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Draft EIR, operations at the intersection of North Wolfe Road and East Homesteacl Road«ould not be significantl�-affected b�-the project. Response C40-2: EmploS-ees��ho use the Corporate Fitness Center��ould be directed to pa�lc in the parlcing facilities else��here��ithin the project site. As pa�t of Condi- tion of Approval CA-TRANS-3,if pa�lcing spillover is identif�ied as a problem as pa�t of annual pa�lcing monitoring, a detailed pa�lcing manage- ment plan«ould be provided and aclditional measures«ould be talcen (including the provision of additional parlcing on the project site). A cross��allc has not been proposed at the intersection of Nightingale Avenue and East Homestead Road. Response C40-3: As proposed,the project��ould provide a shuttle stop pullout on the south side of East Homestead Road just east of the North Wolfe Road intersection. The stop��ould on1�-be used b�-Apple's 15-seat emplo5-ee Sprinter vans. Use of the Sprinter vans that��ould use the stop on East Homestead Road��ould be limited to employees��ho a�e traveling to or lea�ing the Corporate Fitness Center. The relativel�-small number of vans accessing the Corporate Fitness Center«ould not substantiall�-increase traffic on East Homestead Road. Most project emplo5-ees��ould use the Transit Center on North Tantau Avenue. Response C40-4: As discussed on pages 432 to 437 of the Draft EIR,the proposed project ��ould provide adequate pa�lcing on-site (��ith implementation of Mitigation Measure TRANS-35),thus limiting the demand for off-site pa�lcing. As part of the conditions of approval,the project sponsor��ould fund monitoring to assess��hether intrusion occurs and measures to ameliorate pa�lcing intru- sion. The measure��ould be subject to Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale approval. Response C40-5: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic and Master Response #11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure. Response C40-6: Please refer to Master Response#14: Ne�� Free��a�-Ramps. Response C40-7: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C41 Martin Landszaat July 21,2013 Response C41-1: Please refer to the discussion of Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 on page 394 of the Draft EIR and Mitigation Measure TRANS-25 on page 420 of the Draft EIR If agreement is reached��ith Caltrans to construct these mitigation measures (��hich a�e outside the control of the Cit�-of Cupertino),project impacts at I-280/Wolfe Road��ould be reduced to a less-than-significant level. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L g7 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C42 Ronald Moore July 21,2013 Response C42-L This comment is simila�to and from the same commenter as Comment C2. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The comment about the consolidation of Apple emplo5-ees on the site is noted and is reflected in the discussion of proposed project emplo5-ment on pages 91 to 92 of the Draft EIR. Response C42-2: Please see Response to Comment C44-1. Response C42-3: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C42-4: This comment,��hich suggests that Apple open a store in Cupertino,is noted. This comment does not pertain to environmental issues surrounding the project and no further response is required. COMMENTER C43 Patrick Robbins July 21,2013 Response C43-1: As discussed on page 215,project effects due to light and gla�e��ould be less-than-signif�icant at all locations,including nea�Receptor 4,��hich is nea� the location described b�-the commenter. As sho«n in Table V.B-1, llluminance Assessment of Receptor Locations,the illuminance value at Receptor 4��ould increase b�-on1�-0.130 footcandle��ith implementation of the proposed project(far belo�� the threshold of 0.8 footcandle). Response C43-2: This intersection��as not included in the anal�-sis because, as the comment notes,it is a minor all-��a�-stop controlled intersection (and thus��ould not be subject to substantial project traff�ic). Felu&Peers conducted follo��-up obseivations at this intersection in September 2013. The observations indicate that the intersection operates at approiimatel�-LOS C in both the AM and PM pealc periods,��hich is an acceptable level of seivice. Although queuing of up to sii ca�s��as obseived on Pruneridge Avenue,no eicessive queuing or unsafe driving behavior«as obseived. Response C43-3: As sho��n in Figure V.I-7,Project Trip Distribution,the intersection of Pruneridge Avenue and North Tantau Avenue is not projected to eiperience substantial increases in vehicle trips. Thus the relativel�-minor change in operation at this intersection is not surprising. Response C43-4: Please refer to pages 128 to 129 and pages 434 to 435 of the Draft EIR for a discussion of special event pa�lcing. As discussed on page 128, on special event da�-s emplo5-ees��ho typically-pa�lc in the Auditorium and Valet Parlcing P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L gg LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES facilit�-��ould be directed to parlc else��here(including at off-site locations requiring shuttle transport,ifnecessa�y). These employees��ould be given advance notice of the pa�lcing restrictions, and provision«ould be made for pa�lcing at other locations��ithin the project site or other Apple facilities in the a�ea. Special events��ould occur approiimatel�-three to four times a�-ea�, and on these occasions—due to the pa�lcing protocols established b�-Apple—no significant spillover pa�lcing is eipected to occur off-site. Response C43-5: As sho��n on page 453 of Section V.J,Noise, of the Draft EIR,the purpose of the short-term noise monitoring��as to establish the eiisting ambient noise environment at sensitive land uses in the vicinit�-of the project site. These noise measurements��ere not used in the anal�-sis of significant impacts. Modeled traffic noise levels that«ould be eiperienced under project condi- tions«ere compa�ed to modeled traf£ic noise levels under conditions«ithout the project and��ere not compared to eiisting measured noise levels. Using modeled noise levels,rather than measured noise levels,is standa�d practice and is considered to produce more accurate results since measured noise during a single day or a small number of da�-s ma�-not be representative of project conditions. In rega�d to potential project-related noise increases for residences on Pruneridge Avenue, based on the anticipated trip distribution pattern of the proposed project,the segment of Pruneridge Avenue bet��een North Tantau Avenue and La��rence Eipress��ay��ould eiperience less than 1 percent of total project trips. Therefore, simila�to all other road��a�-segments��ith higher project trip volumes that��ere modeled and anal�-zed in the noise anal�-sis,project-related traffic noise impacts along Pruneridge Avenue ��ould be less than significant. COMMENTER C44 Mary Brunkhorst July 21,2013 Response C44-L This comment,��hich summa�izes some of the lce�-conclusions of the Draft EIR rega�ding traf£ic impacts,is noted. Response C44-2: This comment,��hich describes eiisting traffic conditions obseived b�-the commenter,is noted. Response C44-3: As discussed in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR, operations at the intersection of North Wolfe Road and East Homesteacl Road��ould not be significantl�-affected b�-the project. Response C44-4: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L gg LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C44-5: Pedestrian crossings��ere considered��hen conducting the traffic anal�-sis. The ezisting traffic signal timing,��ith slight modifications, could accommodate aclded pedestrians«ithout increasing the dela�-s to vehicles. Response C44-6: Please see Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure. Response C44-7: As discussed on page 35 of the Draft EIR,the cumulative anal�-sis of traffic in the Draft EIR talces into account traf£ic from pending developments in the a�ea, along��ith reasonabl�-foreseeable road��a�-improvements. In general, mitigation occurs on a project-b5--project basis, and individual project applicants��ould be requued to mitigate the effects oftheu projects on the transportation s�-stem to a less-than-signif�icant level,��here feasible. Response C44-8: Please see Master Response#1: Significant and Unavoidable Impacts. Apple ��ould��orlc��ith the Cit�-of Cupertino,the VTA, and Caltrans to obtain the necessa�y permits to construct improvements in the Caltrans right-of-��a�-. The Cit�-and Caltrans anticipate ha�ing the improvements��ithin Caltrans' right-of-��a�-completed prior to final occupancy of the project. Secondai�- impacts associated��ith the mitigation measures ha�e been considered in the Draft EIR. Response C44-9: Apple��ould be required to implement all mitigation measures that are ��ithin the responsibilit�-and jurisdiction of the Cit�-of Cupertino. Regarding mitigation measures that a�e��ithin the responsibilit�-and jurisdiction of other agencies, Apple has agreed to coordinate and collaborate��ith the eitra-jurisdictional agencies to construct each mitigation measure, or to provide funding to the agencies to design and construct either: (1)the identified mitigation measure or(2) an altemate improvement��hich mitigates the impact to the satisfaction of the Cit�-of Cupertino. Please see Master Response#1: Significant and Una�oidable Impacts. Response C44-10: This comment,��hich eipresses support for the closure of Pruneridge Avenue��ithin the project site and does not pertain to the adequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. Response C44-1L This comment,��hich summarizes previous comments,is noted. Response C44-12: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C45 Nancy Wagner July 21,2013 Response C45-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C45-2: Both the type and number of project-related vehicles using road��a�-s in the vicinit�-of the site��ere talcen into account as part of the noise anal�-sis for the project described in Section V.J,Noise, of the Draft EIR The number of vehicles using Pruneridge Avenue east of the project site is not eipected to increase substantiall�-��ith implementation of the proposed project. Less than 1 percent of project trips��ould use the segment of Pruneridge Avenue bet��een North Tantau Avenue and La��rence Eipress��a5-,resulting in a negligible increase in traffio-related noise. The impacts of the project on noise levels along Pruneridge Avenue east of the project site��ould thus be less than significant. Response C45-3: This general comment about eipected increases in traf£ic along North Tantau Avenue is noted. Response C45-4: Please see Response to Comment C45-2. Response C45-5: This comment about building height preference is noted. As sho��n in Figure V.B-4, Visual Simulations, Vie��point 3, East Pruneridge Avenue,project buildings from this location«ould be completely obscured b�-vegetation. Response C45-6: This general concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C46 Sally Everett-Beaupre July 21,2013 Response C46-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C46-2: Please refer to pages 212 to 215 of the Draft EIR,��hich discuss the less- than-significant impacts of the project on light and gla�e. Response C46-3: Please refer to the visual simulations of the project on page 194 to 204 of the Draft EIR. COMMENTER C47 Patrick Waddell July 21,2013 Response C47-1: Santa Clara residents could continue to access the I-280/Wolfe Road interchange via Homesteacl Roacl or Vallco Parlc«a�-. The detour is estimated to be just over 0.5 mile,��hich��ould acld a negligible amount of travel time. Access to I-280 northbound«ould not be restricted to the interchange at Stevens Creek Boulevard. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C47-2: Please see Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure, as��e11 as Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. Response C47-3: This comment,��hich does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. Response C47-4: Chapter VI, Alternatives, of the Draft EIR,includes anal�-sis of four project altematives,including the No Project altemative,Pruneridge Avenue alternative, Reduced Construction altemative, and Reduced Densit�-altema- tive. These altematives a�e anal�-zed for each of the topics evaluated in detail in the Draft EIR In acldition, as described on pages 625 and 626 of the Draft EIR, seven aclditional alternatives«ere considered but rejected for further anal�-sis because the�-��ould conflict��ith project objectives or��ould not substantiall�-reduce the environmental impacts of the project. Response C47-5: As discussed on page 626,the Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative��as not rejected from anal�-sis solel�-due to conflicts��ith the eiisting sanitai�-se��er line. It��as also rejected because it��ould infringe on private property and could result in adverse visual impacts and incur significant costs. Response C47-6: Apple considers any-public access on the site to compromise its prima��- securit�-objective. Please refer to Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. Response C47-7: Please refer to Response to Comment B3-22 and Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. COMMENTER C48 Dale Porter July 21,2013 Response C48-L This comment,which does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. See Master Response#3: Mitigation Neius. Also,the retention of Pruneridge Avenue in its eiisting condition is evaluated as pa�-t of the No Project alternative discussed in Chapter VI, Altematives. COMMENTER C49 Anonymous July 21,2013 Response C49-L This comment,��hich eipresses opposition to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue as part of the project,is noted. The evaluation of impacts of the closure on the transportation pattems of The Hamptons residents is discussed on pages 429 to 430 of the Draft EIR. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�2 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C49-2: The proposed Apple Campus��ould not be open to the public. COMMENTER C50 A Local July 20,2013 Response C50-1: As noted on page 134 of the Draft EIR,the proposed project��ould be required to meet Leaclership in Energy-and Environmental Design(LEED) Silver certification or an equivalent,as identified in the Cit�-of Cupertino Green Building Ordinance. Apple has committed to incorporating into the project the sustainabilit�-features discussed on pages 134 to 136 of the Draft EIR. Response C50-2: This comment,��hich does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER C51 Ruth Moore July 20,2013 Response C51-1: Please refer to Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C52 Harvey Checkman July 19,2013 Response C52-L The segment of Pruneridge Avenue��ithin the site that��ould be closed as pa�t of the project is not a designated emergenc5-access route. With the addition of project traffic,there«ould be added dela�-s on Homestead Road during the pealc commute periods;ho«ever,the dela�-s«ould not be severe. For eiample,in the evening��hen commute congestion is greater,the dela�- on eastbound Homestead Road (to��ards Kaiser Hospital) at Wolfe Road is estimated to increase b�- 10 seconds. Similarly,the dela�-on southbound Wolfe Road to��a�ds Kaiser Hospital is estimated to increase b�- 15 seconds. Emergenc5-vehicles«ould continue to be able to navigate the coi7idors«ith emergenc5-signal pre-emption that give priorit5-signals to emergenc5- response vehicles (as required b5-Mitigation Measure PSU-1). Response C52-2: This proposal for the rerouting of Pruneridge Avenue resembles that described for the Mobilit�-and Parlc altemative described on page 626 of the Draft EIR That alternative��as rejected because it��ould pose signif�icant securit�-concerns to Apple,thus compromising one of Apple's key objectives for the project. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I�J LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C52-3: Please see Master Response#12: Trip Cap. Response C52-4: Please see Master Response#3: Mitigation Neius. Response C52-5: Please see Master Response#3: Mitigation Neius. Such a local hiring program«ould be difficult to aclminister/enforce and ma�-do little to reduce the effects of the project on the local and regional road��a�-s�-stem (if,for instance,local residents drive to��orlc). Since Apple has historicall�-found success in reducing vehicle traffic through its TDM Program,the Cit�-has determined that a more robust TDM Program (as requued by Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b)��ould be the most effective��a�-to further reduce traffic generated b�-the proposed project. Response C52-6: Please see response to comment C52-2. COMMENTER C53 Ann (Last name not pNOVided) July 19,2013 Response C53-L Impact AIR-1 and Impact AIR-2 identif�-impacts to regional air qualit5- attainment standa�ds from eiceedances in criteria pollutant thresholds (see Table V.L-5 and Table V.L-7 of the Draft EIR). As sho��n in Table V.L-5, construction emissions of ozone precursors (ROG and NOi)«ould eiceed the Ba�-Area Au Qualit�-Management District(BAAQMD)threshold for a�erage daily-construction emissions. As sho��n in Table V.L-7, operational anal�-sis results indicate the net ne« project emissions«ould eiceed the BAAQMD's threshold for ROG,NO,,PMz.;and PM,o. The prima��-source of construction emission eiceedances is construction trucic trips,��hile the prima��-source of project operation emissions is mobile source emissions generated b�-employee,visitor, and vendor vehicle trips to and from the project site. These emissions associated��ith the project a�e regional in nature,meaning that air pollutants a�e rapidly-dispersed or,in the case of vehicle emissions associated��ith the project,emissions a�e released in other a�eas of the au basin. Because the resulting emissions are dispersed rapidly-and contribute on1�-a small fraction of the region's air pollution, air qualit5-in the immediate vicinit�-of the project site (including the Kaiser Hospital)��ould not substantiall�-change compa�ed to eiisting conditions as the air qualit5-monitoring data reported in Table V.L-2. Site-specific construction and operational health rislc modeling��as per- formed (see pages 552 to 559 of the Draft EIR),talcing into account predomi- nant«inds, and results indicate that the project air emissions«ould not create a significant rislc«ould not occur to nearb�-residents or other sensitive receptors (including the hospital). P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�4 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C53-2: With the acldition of project traffic,there«ould be aclded dela�-s on Homestead Road during the pealc commute periods; ho«ever,the dela�-s«ould not be severe. For eiample,in the evening��hen commute congestion is greater,the dela�-on eastbound Homestead Road (to«ards Kaiser Hospital) at Wolfe Road is estimated to increase b�- 10 seconds. Simila�ly,the dela�-on southbound Wolfe Road to��a�ds Kaiser Hospital is estimated to increase b�- 15 seconds. Emergenc5-vehicles«ould continue to be able to navigate the coi7idors«ith emergenc5-signal pre-emption that give priorit5-signals to emergenc5-response vehicles (as required b5-Mitigation Measure PSU-1). Response C53-3: Please see Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure. COMMENTER C54 Ann (Last name not pNOVided) July 19,2013 Response C54-L This comment is noted. The inconsistenc�-of the proposed closure of Pruneridge Avenue��ith General Plan policies is discussed under Impacts PLAN-2,PLAN-5, and PLAN-6 in the Draft EIR. Response C54-2: Impacts related to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue��ould be significant and una�oidable because the provision of public access tluough the project site ��ould conflict��ith the prima��-securit�-objective identified b�-Apple for the project,thus compromising the viabilit�-of the project. The term "unmitigable"is not used to describe these impacts. Response C54-3: Simila�to the Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel altemative discussed on page 626 of the Draft EIR, a pedestrian/bic�-cle bridge crossing the project site��ould require acquisition of right-of-��ay,result in adverse visual impacts,��ould incur significant costs, and ma�-still pose significant securit�-concerns. Therefore, such an altemative��ould not be environmentall�-superior to other project altematives evaluated in detail in the Draft EIR(including the Pruneridge Avenue altemative,��hich��ould preseive Pruneridge Avenue in place)and��i11 not be anal�-zed further. COMMENTER C55 Pingang and Wen Wang July 19,2013 Response C55-1: As discussed in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation,the project ��ould not result in a significant impact on Intersection#35 (La��rence Eipress��a5-/Pruneridge Avenue). Therefore,no improvementmeasures a�e identif�ied in the Draft EIR at this intersection. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�5 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C56 Jeremy Hubble July 19,2013 Response C56-1: Please see Master Response#10: Median on East Homestead Road and Response to Comment A1-18. The road��a�-/bilce facilit�-constraints referenced in the comment represent an eiisting condition in the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale for��hich the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale has the responsibilit�-for and jurisdiction over the implementation of the improvements. Response C56-2: Increases in traf£ic on East Homestead Roacl��ould not result in bilce/ pedestrian conflicts because as part of the project aclequate bilce/pedestrian facilities«ould be provided along East Homesteacl Road. Please refer to page 112 of the Draft EIR for a description of these facilities. Response C56-3: Please refer to Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. COMMENTER C57 Vincent Grande July 17,2013 Response C57-L This comment,��hich does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. Response C57-2: Please refer to Master Response#14: Ne�� Free��a�-Ramps. COMMENTER C58 Anonymous July 17,2013 Response C58-1: Refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation,��hich anal�-zes the effect of the project on the operation of North Wolfe Road and East Homestead Road. COMMENTER C59 David Mooso July 14,2013 Response C59-1: In regard to potential project-related noise increases for residences on Pruneridge Avenue, based on the anticipated trip distribution pattern of the proposed project,the segment of Pruneridge Avenue bet��een North Tantau Avenue and La��rence Eipress��ay��ould eiperience less than 1 percent of total project trips. Therefore,project-related traffic noise impacts along Pruneridge Avenue��ould be less than significant. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�6 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C60 Art Cohen July 14,2013 Response C60-1: Please see Master Response#3: Mitigation Neius. Securit�-concems sui7ounding the project ha�e not been identified as a significant impact that ��ould requue mitigation. COMMENTER C61 Denia Phillips July 12,2013 Response C61-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C62 James (Last name not pNOVided) July 12,2013 Response C62-L Impacts to migratoi�-birds are discussed on pages 258 to 260 of the Draft EIR It is unclea��h�-the commenter believes the circula�design of the Main Building��ould appear as a��ater bod�-from the perspective of fly-ing migratoi�-birds. Apa�t from its circula�design in plan vie��,the Main Building��ould ha�e no other cha�acteristics of a��ater bod5-(see Figure III- 4 and III-Sa for representative plan vie��s of the Main Building). The interior court�-ard of the Main Building«ould be landscaped and«ould contain numerous built features,including a central garden,food stations,mainte- nance access, dining tei7ace, and path��a5-s,none of��hich a�e characteristic of the aquatic portion of a lalce or pond. The interior court�-a�d��ould ha�e no major elements��ith reflective qualities, other than a small��ater feature. Therefore,it is unlilcel�-the circular la�-out of the Main Building��ould be "eztremel�-confusing to migratoi�-fly-ing animals." COMMENTER C63 John Kilmer July 11,2013 Response C63-L The comment appears to be refei7ing to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue (not North Tantau Avenue)��ithin the project site. Please see Master Response: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Closure and the discussion on pages 427 to 428 of the Draft EIR. Please refer to pages 590 to 592 of the Draft EIR for a discussion of the project's potential effects on emergenc5- response times. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�7 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C64 Elaine Manley July 11,2013 Response C64-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C64-2: Additional pa�lcing on the site is not desuable from an environmental perspective because: 1) as eiplained on pages 432 to 437 of the Draft EIR, the parlcing proposed for the site«ould be aclequate to meet demand«ith implementation of a TDM Program; 2)too much pa�lcing on the site could reduce the desirabilit�-of altemate transportation modes and generate aclditional traf£ic; and 3)the construction of ne« or la�ger buildings on the site to accommodate parlcing«ould result in adverse impacts related to au pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions. In addition,the project site��ould not be open to the public. Thus,long-term pa�lcing demand for visitors is eipected to be modest and could be accommodated«ithin proposed visitor pa�lcing facilities. Ho��ever, as pa�t of Condition of Approval CA-TRANS-3, if parlcing spillover is identif�ied as a problem as part of annual pa�lcing monitoring, a detailed parlcing management plan«ould be provided and additional measures«ould be talcen (including the provision of additional pa�lcing on the project site). Response C64-3: Please see Master Response#10: Median on East Homestead Road. Response C64-4: This comment about the merits of the project design is noted. Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C64-5: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C65 Andy Frazer Carol Absalom Kevin Klenk Yair Barniv Pearl Wang July 10,2013 Response C65-1: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. Response C65-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C65-3: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Response C65-4: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. The 34 percent diversion rate«ould be achieved through enforcement and regula� P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES monitoring of the TDM Program required as pa�t of Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b. Response C65-5: It is not anticipated that the mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR to reduce impacts atthe I-280/Wolfe Roacl and La��rence Eipress��a5-/I-280 interchanges«ould be inadequate, based on the transportation anal�-sis conducted as pa�t of the project. Response C65-6: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. The Condition of Approval that��ould require Apple to set aside $500,000 for the Cit�-of Sunn�,-vale and $250,000 for the Cit�-of Santa Cla�a is intended to allo�� for the monitoring of cut-through traffic and the potential installation of traffic calming measures should cut-tluough traffic-related problems arise due to implementation of the proposed project. These funds are not intended to be used for"helping traffic to/from/through the main a�-teries of 280,Wolfe, and La��rence." Response C65-7: Please see Response to Comment C65-5. COMMENTER C66 Indranil Das July 4,2013 Response C66-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C66-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Also,refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Cuculation,��hich anal�-zes the effect of the project on the operation of North Wolfe Road and East Homestead Road. Response C66-3: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traf£ic. As discussed on pages 432 to 437 of the Draft EIR, aclequate pa�lcing��ould be provided��ithin the project site (and pa�lcing off-site��ould not be convenient). Therefore, spillover pa�lcing off-site is not eipected. Response C66-4: Please refer to the mitigation measures identif�ied in Sections V.I, Transportation and Cuculation; V.J,Noise; and V.L, Air Qualit�-. These measures«ould be requued to be implemented b�-the Cit�-. Response C66-5: The entrance on East Homestead Road��ould prima�ily be for bic�-clists and pedestrians. Please refer to Response to Comment C66-3 rega�ding the eipectation that spillover pa�lcing outside the site is not eipected. Response C66-6: Although the I-280/Wolfe Road interchange��ould be bus�-at pealc hours, there«ould be capacit5-for aclditional vehicles generated b�-the project. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 1�g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C66-7: Such a pa�lcing control measure could be implemented if, as a result of implementation of Condition of Approval CA-TRANS-3 (see pages 435 to 437 of the Draft EIR), spillover pa�lcing occurs in adjacent neighborhoods. Response C66-8: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C67 Michelle Philips July 10,2013 Response C67-1: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. COMMENTER C68 Ann (Last name not pNOVided) July 3,2013 Response C68-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C68-2: See Master Response#15: School Busing Program. COMMENTER C69 David Mooso June 30,2013 Response C69-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Mitigation Measure PLAN-2 ��ould include the construction of an alternate creelc trail, and pa�tial funding of a trail stud�-for the drainage channel and segment of Calabazas Creelc south ofthe project site. See also Master Response#13: Calabazas Creelc Trail. COMMENTER C70 UP June 30,2013 Response C70-1: Please see Master Response#1: Significant and Una�oidable Impacts and Master Response#2: Project Merits. Please also refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR,��hich anal�-zes the effects of the project on the transportation linlcs listed in the comment. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 11� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C71 David Mooso June 30,2013 Response C71-L The provision of a northbound right-tum overlap phase��ith the��estbound left-tum vehicle phase is a feasible signal control measure. The traffic phasings/timings for the North Tantau Avenue/Pruneridge Avenue intersec- tion��ould be refined during the project entitlement process. This suggestion «i11 be considered at that time. COMMENTER C72 Loran Stringer June 30,2013 Response C72-1: Please see Master Response#12: Trip Cap. COMMENTER C73 Michelle Connelly June 30,2013 Response C73-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Please also refer to the discussion of the Reduced Densit�-altemative, on pages 619 to 625 of the Draft EIR That altemative��ould reduce the size of the project to reduce traffic impacts and other related impacts. See also Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. Response C73-2: The potential intermittent use of outdoor areas a�ound the perimeter of the project site b�-smolcers��ould not result in a signif�icant health rislc as public eiposure to such smolce«ould be sporadic. Response C73-3: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C74 Sally Everett-Beaupre June 29,2013 Response C74-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C74-2: The anal�-sis of the environmental effects of the project in the Draft EIR��as not confined to the geographic confines of Cupertino and eitends to all bordering jurisdictions. Response C74-3: Please refer to Master Response#14: Ne�� Free��a�-Ramps. Also,it should be noted that Apple's eiisting TDM program has been successful in diverting P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 111 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES approiimatel�-28 percent of Apple emplo5-ees from the use of single-occupant vehicles. Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b��ould increase this diversion rate to 34 percent,��ith stringentmonitoring requirements to ensure compliance. Response C74-4: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C75 Jon Ramos June 26,2013 Response C75-L The Draft EIR is most easil�-accessible via the Cit�-'s��ebsite for the project: http:/h��.cupertino.or�/indei.aspi?pa�e=1107. The eiisting buildings on the site��ould be demolished as pa�-t of the project. Refer to page 61 of the Draft EIR for a description of the zoning designations on the project site. COMMENTER C76 Ann Peterson June 26,2013 Response C76-1: Due to the robust ma�lcet for office space in Cupertino and in sui7ounding communities, an�-buildings vacated b�-Apple are eipected to be occupied b5- different tenants. Long-term building vacancies due to the project(and associated adverse envuonmental impacts such as urban blight) a�e not anticipated. COMMENTER C77 Jeff Greef June 26,2013 Response C77-L The greenhouse gas emissions that��ould be generated b�-the proposed project ha�e been quantif�ied and a�e sho��n in the Draft EIR in Table V.K-2 (Project Construction Emissions)on page 504 and Table V.K-3 on page 510. This comment also requests the quantification of ca�bon emissions from the off-site production of construction materials. The term "total carbon footprint" is subject to a��ide va�iet�-of interpretations. The Draft EIR contains an eitensive anal�-sis of the greenhouse gas emissions eipected to result from construction and operation of the project. For the construction anal�-sis, transportation of construction materials to the site and onsite construction activities ha�e been estimated and evaluated. To the eitent the commenter is inquuing about manufacturing processes off-site,there is eitensive publicly a�ailable information on the estimated emissions associated��ith processes such as cement production, steel production, and glass manufacturing. At this stage in the planning process, due to variations in construction suppliers and vendors,it is not possible to develop an accurate estimate of construction P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 112 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES lifec�-cle emissions. Off-site production of greenhouse gas emissions is typically-monitored and inventoried for compliance��ith State greenhouse gas reduction goals independently-from the end product user. Additionally, an anal�-sis of total construction lifec�-cle emissions is not required b5-the California Air Resources Boa�d or the Ba�-Area Air Qualit�-Management District for CEQA documents, and specific methodologies for calculating such emissions ha�e not been mandated. The attribution of such emissions is also typically-assigned in the first instance to the producer,not the end product user. For eiample,the World Resources Institute has observed that"[t]he significant quantities of energy and GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions that a�e embodied in these products are,under prevailing GHG accounting s5-stems, attributed to the counti�-of production, not consumption."i As for the consideration of emissions that��ould not ha�e occui7ed hacl the project not occui7ed,the Draft EIR has anal�-zed and considered the greenhouse gas emissions for this project, as compa�ed to the baseline conditions (as requued b5-CEQA),to determine the emissions attributable to the project.Please refer to the eitensive sustainabilit�-features that��ould be designed into the project, described on pages 134 to 136 of the Draft EIR, ��hich��ere talcen into account in conducting this anal�-sis. Response C77-2: Please see Response to Comment C77-1. COMMENTER C78 Mahesh Nihalani June 26,2013 Response C78-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C79 Anonymous June 25,2013 Response C79-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. i World Resotuces Insfitute.20�.�avigati�rg the l-zaixhers:Gree�rhozrse GasData a�rd brtenratzo�ra7 C'Iirixate Po7icy, Execzrtzve.Srrrixrixary. Website:hthp://pdf.�vri.ore/navieatin�numbers.pdf. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I IJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C80 John Nelson June 26,2013 Response C80-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. Please also refer to the discussion of the Reduced Densit�-altemative, on pages 619 to 625 of the Draft EIR That altemative��ould reduce the size of the project to reduce traffic impacts and other related impacts. COMMENTER C81 Charles Hanson June 25,2013 Response C81-1: As discussed on page 137 of the Draft EIR, as pa�t of the project, a minimum of 75 percent of construction and demolition«aste«ould be diverted from landfills and recvcled or reused. COMMENTER C82 Anonymous June 25,2013 Response C82-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C83 Walter Li June 25,2013 Response C83-1: As discussed on page 182 of the Draft EIR, CEQA Gz�idelines Section 15125 requires an EIR to evaluate the impacts of the project compa�ed to "baseline conditions"that a�e defined as the conditions that"eiist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of prepa�ation is published,at the time environmental anal�-sis is commenced,from both a local and regional perspective."Accordingly-,the baseline condition used to evaluate the impacts of the project includes a site occupancy of approiimately 4,844 employees (the number of employees that occupied the project site in August 2011,��hen the Notice of Prepa�ation��as released). Ho��ever, Chapter VI, Alternatives, includes an anal�-sis of the impacts of a project that��ould allo�� for full occupanc5-(i.e., 9,800 emplo5-ees) of the eiisting buildings on the project site. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 114 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C84 Marc Aronson June 21,2013 Response C84-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C85 Jennifer Martin June 18,2013 Response C85-1: Please see Master Response: Anal�-sis ofNeighborhood Cut-Through Traf£ic. Response C85-2: Mitigation Measure NOI-1 in the Draft EIR��ould ensure that construction activities a�e in compliance��ith the Municipal Code and all applicable noise regulations. COMMENTER C86 Mike Hammes June 17,2013 Response C86-1: In the transportation anal�-sis conducted as pa�t of the Draft EIR, a small percentage of project traffic��as assumed to access the project site via the I- 280/De Anza Bouleva�d interchange;thus the anal�-sis captures the scenario identif�ied in this comment. Response C86-2: As part of Condition of Approval CA-TRANS-3,if pa�lcing spillover is identif�ied as a problem as pa�t of annual parlcing monitoring (��hich could include monitoring of the nearb�-Kaiser facilities), a detailed pa�lcing management plan«ould be provided and aclditional measures«ould be talcen (including the provision of additional parlcing on the project site). COMMENTER C87 Aleksandr Movshovich June 17,2013 Response C87-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits and Master Response#5: Public Access Through Project Site. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 115 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C88 Edward Hirshfield June 17,2013 Response C88-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The comment also notes that shifting the��orlc hours of Apple emplo5-ees a��a�-from pealc periods could reduce project traffic impacts. This concept is emplo5-ed in the list of "Additional TDM Measures"discussed on page 443 of the Draft EIR These measures,��hich include the implementation of a fleiible��orlc schedule and the encouragement of telecommuting,��ould be implemented if the TDM measures identif�ied as pa�t of the project fail to meet the pealc hour counts goal established in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b. COMMENTER C89 Linda Vanderhule June 17,2013 Response C89-L This comment,which does not pertain to the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER C90 Gary Jones June 15,2013 Response C90-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C91 Jun Xu June 14,2013 Response C91-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C92 Sue and Joel Rosado June 14,2013 Response C92-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits and Responses to Comments A1-13 and C1-1. Response C92-2: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 116 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C93 Frank Bryan June 14,2013 Response C93-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits and Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure. COMMENTER C94 Sharon (Last name not pNOVided) June 14,2013 Response C94-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits and Master Response#11: Diverted Trips Due to Pruneridge Avenue Closure.. COMMENTER C95 Ying Xia June 12,2013 Response C95-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C96 Richard Altmaier June 12,2013 Response C96-L This comment,��hich generally-pertains to the merits of the project, and supports the mitigation measures identif�ied in the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER C97 David Cookson June 7,2013 Response C97-1: As discussed on pages 344 to 345 of the Draft EIR, Mitigation Measure HAZ-3 ��ould require the project sponsor to conduct haza�dous materials suive�-s of all buildings on the site that have not been previousl�-inspected or abated. Buildings identified as containing haza�dous building materials «ould be abated in accordance«ith all applicable local, State, and federal regulations. Hazardous building materials«ould thus be monitored on the site until abated,thus reducing the potential for emissions of haza�dous building materials in the air to a less-than-significant leveL Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a and HAZ-2b, discussed on page 344 of the Draft EIR, ��ould requue the preparation of an Envuonmental Site Management Plan (��hich could itself require ongoing monitoring) and a vapor intrusion assessment to ensure that residual haza�dous materials in ground��ater and P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 117 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES soil on the project site are not released into the air such that the�-��ould result in a significant health rislc to the public. COMMENTER C98 Kevin Klenk June 7,2013 Response C98-L This comment generally-pertains to the impacts of the project on free��a�- interchanges. Please refer to Mitigation Measures TRANS-1, TRANS-3, TRANS-5, TRANS-9a, TRANS-10, TRANS-11, TRANS-14, TRANS-19a, TRANS-20, TRANS-21, TRANS-22, TRANS-25, and TRANS-26 in the Draft EIR These measures represent feasible improvements to free��a�-s to reduce the impacts of the project on congestion levels. In addition, Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b��ould require that 34 percent of project trips be diverted from single-occupanc5-vehicles,thus reducing the project's impact on the roacl��a�-s�-stem,including free��a5-s. COMMENTER C99 Willie LU June 6,2013 Response C99-L The traffic data referenced in the comment is noted, but it is unclear ho�� this relates to the impact analy-sis in the Draft EIR. Please also refer to Master Response#2: Project Merits. While there ma�-be merits to locating a corporate campus at a distance from population centers,the benefits of this approach include: proiimity bet��een jobs/housing (and the potential for reduced commutes) and proiimity to transit seivices («hich can benefit levels of traffic congestion, air pollutant emissions, and greenhouse gas emissions). Response C99-2: Please note that��hile attome�-s��ere involved in the prepa�ation of the Draft EIR,the report��as primarily-authored b�-a team of technical eiperts under the direction and supeivision of Cit�-of Cupertino Department of Communit�- Development staff(See Draft EIR Chapter VIII, Report Preparation). The mitigation measures in the report«ould be enforced and monitored b�-means of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that��ould be macle a�ailable to the public. Please also refer to Master Response#1: Significant and Una�oidable Impacts. Response C99-3: This comment is noted, although it does not pertain to specific environmental issues related to the project and no further response is required. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 11 g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C100 Giselle Ballou June 6,2013 Response C100-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. This comment also suggests that the project��ould increase traffic in the area. This comment is consistent ��ith the anal�-sis in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR. COMMENTER C101 Cynthia Smyth June 6,2013 Response C101-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C102 Milt Kostner June 6,2013 Response C102-1: Please refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Cuculation,for a discussion of questions relating to impacts associated��ith the removal of Pruneridge Avenue on a�-terials and free��a�-interchanges in the vicinit�-of the project site and associated«ith bus traffic. Response C102-2: Please refer to Mitigation Measure NOI-1,��hich addresses the hours during ��hich construction activities could occur. Eiterior project noise-generating construction activities��ithin 750 feet of residentiall�-zoned property��ould be permitted on1�-bet��een the��eelcda�-hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Response C102-3: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. The open space��ithin the site,��hile not phy-sically-accessible to the public,��ould be visible through a metal,po��der-coated,picicet-st5-1e fence sui7ounding most of the site. COMMENTER C103 Heidi Johnson June 6,2013 Response C103-1: While it is often suggested that Douglas Fir(Psez�dotsz�ga menziesii)��ill not gro�� in the Santa Cla�a Valle�-and other a�eas adjacent to the San Francisco Bay,in fact, Douglas Fu ha�e been sho��n to thrive in the a�ea a�ound the project site. For instance, a health�-Douglas Fir can be found gro��ing on the southbound I-280 off-ramp at De Anza Boulevard, acljacent to Apple's current Infinite Loop Campus. Additionally, a prominent Douglas Fir in the P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 11g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES a�ea has gro��n immediatel�-acljacent to Stanford's northernmost entrance a�ch at Palm Drive for at least 125 �-ea�s. COMMENTER C104 Richard and Beverly Olsen July 18,2013 Response C104-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. To sign up for notif�ications about the proposed project,please use the Cit�-'s eNotification Signup form: http:/h��.cupertino.or�/indei.aspi?page=480. COMMENTER C105 Todd Beirdo June 30,2013 Response C105-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER C106 Keith Murphy July 22,2013 Response C106-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C106-2: It is unclear��h�-the commenter believes the project has been"fast-traciced," as the environmental revie�� process for the project��as initiated over 2�-ea�s ago (summer of 2011). As discussed on page 494 of the Draft EIR, the project��as certified as an Environmental Leadership Project pursuant to State Assembl�-Bi11900 in April 2013. Under this certification,the project «as required to undergo normal environmental revie« required under CEQA,including all requuements rega�ding the mitigation of signif�icant impacts. Apple's AB 900,Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leaclership Act of 2011 Application is a�ailable here: http:/h��.opr.ca.�ov/s califomiajobs.php. This linlc��as also placed on the Cit�-'s��ebsite for the project. Response C106-3: This comment is noted. As described in pages 225 to 230 of the Draft EIR, the project��ould not result in significant impacts related to housing and thus no mitigation«ould be requued. Response C 106-4: Please see Responses to Comments C 106-2 and C 106-3. Response C106-5: Impacts associated��ith the closure of Pruneridge Avenue a�e discussed throughout Draft EIR, but see in particula�pages 150-152; 156-159; and 427- 430. Please also refer to Master Response#5: Public Access Tluough Project Site. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I2� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Response C106-6: Please refer to Impacts PLAN-1,PLAN-3,PLAN-5, and PLAN-6 in the Draft EIR,��hich relate to General Plan provisions conceming the provision of trails and parlc space��ithin the project site. Please refer to Response to Comment C3-1 regarding the referenced construction project on the site. This tempora��-structure��ould not infringe on the riparian buffer a�ound Calabazas Creelc or Santa Cla�a Valle�-Water District access to the creelc. Response C106-7: Please refer to Response to Comment C106-2 regarding the project's certifica- tion as an Environmental Leadership Project. Please refer to Response to Comment C3-1 rega�ding the referenced construction project on the site. Relevant information about the project is consolidated on one«eb page: Apple Campus 2 Project: http:/h��.cupertino.or�/indei.aspi?pa�e=1107. Response C106-8: Please refer to Response to Comment C3-L The accompany-ing photographs depict the site of the RG1A Mocicup. Response C106-9: This concluding comment is noted. COMMENTER C107 Stephen Rohde July 22,2013 Response C107-L This comment,��hich eipresses support for the project,is noted. Response C107-2: Please see Master Response#10: Median on East Homestead Road. Response C107-3: If designed in accordance��ith Cit�-standa�ds,using appropriate trees species,long-term maintenance of the East Homestead Road median��ould be manageable. Response C107-4: Please refer to Master Response#14: Ne�� Free��a�-Ramps. Response C107-4: This concluding comment,��hich pertains to the merits of the proposed median along East Homestead Road,is noted. COMMENTER C108 Ria Lo July 22,2013 Response C108-1: Please see Master Response#5: Public Access Tluough Project Site. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I21 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER C109 Mette Christensen July 22,2013 Response C109-L The Cit�-coordinates transportation improvements among major develop- ment projects in the City, along��ith requiring each project sponsor to fund transportation improvements needed to reduce the impacts of the project. Additionally,the Cit�-«orlcs duectl�-«ith the residents, businesses, and schools in the Rancho Rinconada area to acldress traf£ic and pa�lcing concems on an on-going basis, and��ill continue to do so as projects in the areamove foi1�a�d. Response C109-2: Please refer to: Muffly, Dave, 2011. Apple Arborist.Apple Campz�s 2, C'onsolidated ANboNist RepoNt. August 1 (and all a�borist reports referenced therein). These reports a�e a�ailable for revie�� as pa�-t of the Administrative Record for the project(accessible at: http:/h��.cupertino.or�/indei.aspi ?pa�e=1107). These reports a�e also a�ailable for revie�� at the Cit�-of Cupertino Communit�-Development Department. Response C 109-3: The City provides a convenient��a�-to send questions,requests, comments and complaints directl�-to Cit�-staff through the "Access Cupertino"linlc on its home page. The linlc can be accessed on the top bar of the Cit�-'s home page. The��ebsite is: ��.cupertino.or�/access/. Response C109-4: This comment introduces eicerpts from the Draft EIR that relate to the previous comments.No further response is requued. Response C109-5: This comment comprises eicerpts from the Draft EIR.No further response is required. COMMENTER C110 Ria Lo July 22,2013 Response C110-L This introductoi�-comment is noted. Response C110-2: This comment,��hich is noted,pertains generally-to the merits of the project design and not the adequac5-of the Draft EIR The anal�-sis in Section V.I, Transportation and Cuculation,talces into account eipected visitors to the project site.With the eiception of special events,visitation to the site is eipected to be modest. Furthermore,most visitors«ould ai7ive at and depart the campus during the midday,��hen traf£ic volumes on the surrounding road«a�-net��orlc a�e lo«er. Response C110-3: Please see Response to Comment C110-2. The "superblocic"la�-out of the campus is discussed in regard to pedestrian and bic�-clist accessibility, and P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I22 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES land use patterns in general, on pages 149 to 152 and 188 to 190 of the Draft EIR. Response C110-4: This comment is noted. In establishing the parlcing supply-for the project (and crafting related mitigation),the lcey objective«as to balance the probable demand for parlcing at the site��ith the understanding that too much pa�lcing ma5-incentivize driving. As discussed in pages 432 to 437 of the Draft EIR,the parlcing supply-talces into account visitor parlcing spaces, and carpooling, and thus does not coi7elate directl�-��ith the desued 34 percent single occupancy vehicle diversion rate required as part of Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b. Response C 110-5: The 34 percent trip diversion requirement in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b is appropriate given Apple's location in a suburban setting. This requirement does not suggest that Apple cannot achieve a higher altemative mode sha�e. The t��o eiamples cited in the comment a�e not completely-analogous to Apple. Stanford has facult�-housing nea�campus��hich supports higher bic�-cle use. Unlilce the project site, both Stanford and Genentech a�e adjacent to high-frequenc5-Caltrain stations and located closer to regional transportation hubs. Response C110-6: The proposed roacl��a�-modif�ications generally-include minor��idening such as the addition of one lane on an approach. Due to the combination of the modifications requiring only-minor«idening and the lo« transit, bic�-cle, and pedestrian volumes in the vicinit�-of the affected intersections, secondai�- impacts to non-auto modes«ould be less than signif�icant. It should be noted, ho��ever,that the designs for the modifications��ould incorporate pedestrian- friendl�-treatments such as na�ro�� lane��idths and tight comer raclii,��here appropriate. In addition,mitigation measures that include roacl��a�-��idening ��ould generally-only occur at locations��here the project is anticipated to acld a substantial amount of vehicle traffic. In general,the preference of the Cit�-is to a�oid road��a�-��idening��here possible. Therefore, afundamental mitigation measure in the Draft EIR is Mitigation Measure TRANS-34, ��hich��ould require a 34 percent trip diversion rate (through implementation of a TDM Program)that is robust considering the relativel�-suburban setting of the project. Response C110-7: The comment about the Cit�-'s minimum pa�lcing requirements is noted. As discussed on page 443 of the Draft EIR, if Apple is unsuccessful at meeting the trip diversion goal requued in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b,it��ould be required to implement additional TDM measures. One such measure could include a parlcing cash-out program,or simila�incentive to reduce parlcing demand. Response C110-8: The closure of the Cupertino Village south entrance represents the closure of one ofthree drive��a�-s on North Wolfe Road. In addition, Cupertino Village is accessible via the North Wolfe Road/Pruneridge Avenue intersection. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IZJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Given the multiple altemative access points onto North Wolfe Roacl,the closure of the southem Cupertino Village drive��a�-is eipected to result in a negligible increase in traffic on East Homestead Road and��ould not compromise the viabilit�-of businesses in the shopping center. Response C110-9: The closure of Pruneridge Avenue is identified as significant and unavoidable for several impact areas in the Draft EIR(see Impacts PLAN-2,PLAN-5, PLAN-6, TRANS-31, TRANS-32, TRANS-33, and TRANS-34. Response C110-10: These reference materials,used to support the previous comments, a�e noted. COMMENTER C111 Sylvia Gallegos July 22,2013 Response C111-1: CEQA requues the leacl agenc5-malce all adopted mitigation measures enforceable and to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program that meets the requirements of CEQA Sections 21081.6(a)(1) and (b),��hich requires the City, as lead agenc5-,to be responsible for monitoring implementation of all adopted mitigation measures that a�e��ithin its responsibilit�-and jurisdiction. The comment suggesting formation of a citizen committee to oversee mitigation monitoring is noted. Response C111-2: The transportation anal�-sis of the Reduced Densit�-altemative in Chapter VI, Altematives,«as conducted at a lesser level of detail than the proposed project, consistent��ith Section 15126.6(d) ofthe CEQA Gz�idelines. Ho��ever,the anal�-sis��as suff�icientl�-detailed to compare the specif�ic impacts of the project on the transportation s�-stem to those that��ould result from the Reduced Densit�-altemative—to "allo�� meaningful evaluation, anal�-sis, and compa�ison��ith the proposed project." Response C111-3: This comment,��hich relates to eiisting bic5-cle facilit�-conditions that ��ould not be affected b�-the project,is noted.No further response is required. Response C111-4: As discussed on page 443 of the Draft EIR,if Apple is unsuccessful at meeting the trip diversion goal required in Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b,it «ould be required to implement additional TDM measures. One such measure could include a pa�lcing cash-out program,��hich is included in the list of TDM measures for future consideration. Response C 111-5: One of the aclditional TDM measures identified on page 443 of the Draft EIR («hich could be employed if Apple does not meet its required trip diversion goal)is an eipansion of the campus car-sharing fleet,��hich, as suggested, malces use of the Apple shuttle more attractive. As for the acquisition or use of pa�lc-and-ride lots, as described in the Draft EIR,if 34 percent TDM P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 124 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES pa�-ticipation is not achieved,the Cit�-��ould��ork��ith Apple to identifi- aclditional measures. One option that ma�-be considered b�-the Cit�-and Apple as another potentiall�-viable TDM measure is the acquisition or use of pa�lc-and-ride lots, although the need,location, and approval of such off-site facilities is speculative and ma�-requue aclditional environmental and discretiona��-revie«. At this point,it is not anticipated that parlc-and-ride lots ��ould be needed to achieve the 34 percent TDM participation because other measures a�e eipected to be successful in diverting trips, so the5-are not included as a specific measure in the Draft EIR. Response C111-6: As discussed on pages 148 to 149 of the Draft EIR,the 1.1-acre requirement for Mitigation Measure PLAN-1 is based on the 1.1-acre portion of the project site that«ould be re-designated from Parlcs and Open Space to Industrial/Residential as pa�t of the project. Replacement pa�k space need not be developed in close proiimit5-to the project site (because the parlc designation��as pa�-t of a residential project that��as never built, and the pa�lc ��as never constructed).Ho��ever,the Cit�-��ould consider local allocations of pa�lc space as a factor in pursuing development of the pa�lc space else��here in the Citv. COMMENTER C112 Wahila Wilkie July 22,2013 Response C112-1: Rega�ding the comment about the closure of Pruneridge Avenue,this issue is discussed throughout the Draft EIR, and in pa�-ticula�pages 150 to 152; 156 to 159; and 427 to 430. Traffic in the vicinit�-of the project site is discussed throughout Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, of the Draft EIR. Requuing Apple to bus children to school as mitigation for project-related traffic impacts��as rejected from detailed consideration in the Draft EIR for the reasons discussed in Master Response#15: School Busing Program. Mitigation Measure PLAN-1��ould requue Apple to provide sufficient funds for the acquisition of 1.1 acres of property for the future development of a pa�lc, or agree to purchase,designate, and dedicate to the Cit�- 1.1 acres of the land else��here in the Cit�-as Pa�lcs and Open Space. COMMENTER C113 Marialis Seehorn July 22,2013 Response C113-1: As discussed in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation, although the project��ould��orsen congestion at certain locations, all intersections and road��a�-net��orks (��ith the eiception of the segment of Pruneridge Avenue P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I25 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ��ithin the project site)��ould remain functional and usable b�-the public, including residents of Sunn�,-vale. COMMENTER C114 Robert Neff July 22,2013 Response C114-L This general comment about bic�-cling conditions is noted.No further response is required. Response C114-2: The project includes numerous transportation net��orlc modifications/ improvements around the project site,including continuous bilce lanes on North Tantau Avenue bet��een East Homestead Roacl and Stevens Creelc Boulevard, as discussed on pages 111 to 112 of the Draft EIR. Response C114-3: As pa�-t of Mitigation Measure TRANS-6, Apple��ould be required to modifi-the East Homestead Road/North Tantau Avenue intersection to provide an eiclusive eastbound right-tum lane. With this modif�ication, as sho��n in Appendii H of the Transportation Impact Anal�-sis (Appendii B of the Draft EIR),the pork-chop island on the south-��est comer��ould be removed. COMMENTER C115 Tammy Mongelli July 22,2013 Response C115-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits and Master Response#3: Mitigation Neius. COMMENTER C116 Ray Crump July 22,2013 Response C116-L This comment,��hich generally-pertains to the merits of the project,is noted. Please also refer to Section V.I, Transportation and Cuculation, of the Draft EIR,��hich identif�ies measures to reduce the traffic generated b�-the project. See Master Response#1: Significant and Una�oidable Impacts regarding the Cit�-'s commitment to implementing mitigation measures that are outside the jurisdiction of Cupertino. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 126 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES D. PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L 127 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES PUBLIC MEETING June 26,2013 COMMENTER D1 Randy Smith Response D1-L This comment,��hich references the beneficial impacts of the project and does not discuss the adequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D2 Dennis Garringon Response D2-L This comment,��hich does not acldress the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D3 Arturo Sainz Response D3-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the adequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D4 David Jamieson Response D4-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER DS A1 Sousa Response DS-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D6 R. T. Parmley Response D6-1: Please see Master Response#5: Public Access Tluough Project Site. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I2 g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER D7 D. Radisic Response D7-1: An Envuonmental Impact Report��as prepa�ed for the Infinite Loop campus that included a Transportation Impact Anal�-sis (TIA). That TIA follo��ed methodologies in developing trip generation estimates and evaluating the effects of the traffic on the sui7ounding roacl��a5-s5-stem that are simila�to those used in the Draft EIR. Anal�-ses using microsimulation��ere not typically-conducted��hen the Infinite Loop campus��as being planned. Therefore the Apple Campus 2 TIA includes elements of a more technicall�- sophisticated anal�-sis to better understand the impacts of the project on the road«a�-net��orlc. COMMENTER D8 Tappan (Tap) Merrick Response D8-L This comment,��hich references a meeting that the commenter hacl��ith an Apple representative,is noted. Response D8-2: Please see Master Response#7: Cut-Through Traffic. COMMENTER D9 E. Castro Response D9-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D10 Jim Reed Response D10-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic and environmental impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR, is noted. COMMENTER D11 Mark Van Den Huevel Response D11-L This comment,��hich also addresses the adequac5-of the Draft EIR and not the adequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L I29 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER D12 Josue Garcia Response D12-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D13 Jose Espinosa Response D13-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER D14 Larry Watson Response D14-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D15 Anonymous Response D15-L This comment eipresses concem about the impacts of the project(identified in the Draft EIR)on the I-280/Wolfe Roacl interchange. Mitigation Measures TRANS-1, TRANS-�, TRANS-14, TRANS-2�, TRANS-26, and TRANS-29 ��ould reduce impacts�to this interchange. COMMENTER D16 Anonymous Response D16-L This comment references the closure of Pruneridge Avenue and the impacts on travel times to nea�b�-services. The closure of Pruneridge Avenue is discussed throughout the Draft EIR, but refer pa�-ticularl�-to pages 150-152; 156-159; and 427-430. With the addition of project traf£ic,there��ould be added dela�-s on Homestead Road during the pealc commute periods; ho��ever,the dela�-s��ould not be severe. For eiample, in the evening��hen commute congestion is greater,the dela�-on eastbound Homestead Road (to��a�ds Kaiser Hospital) at Wolfe Roacl is estimated to increase b�- 10 seconds. Simila�ly,the dela�-on southbound Wolfe Road to«a�ds Kaiser Hospital is estimated to increase b�- 15 seconds. Emergency vehicles��ould continue to be able to na�igate the coi7idors��ith emergenc5-signal pre- emption that give priorit5-signals to emergenc5-response vehicles (as required b5-Mitigation Measure PSU-1). P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IJ� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES COMMENTER D17 Thorisa Yap Response D17-1: Please see Master Response#2: Project Merits. COMMENTER D18 Jim Riley Response D18-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. COMMENTER D19 Lidia Blair Response D19-L This comment,��hich references beneficial socioeconomic impacts of the project and not the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR,is noted. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IJ 1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES E. COMMENTS FROM INDIVIDUALS ON THE MERITS OF THE PROJECT P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IJ2 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES The letters��ith a prefii"E"a�e letters received from individuals via the mail, email, or Cit�-'s ��ebsite in support of the project that pertain solel�-to the merits of the project and do not raise questions or concems about project environmental issues or the aclequac5-of the Draft EIR Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15088 and 15132 of the C'EQA Gz�idelines,no formal response is required. Ho«ever,these comments«il1 be considered b�-the Cit�-decision-malcers«hen project approval is contemplated. See also Master Response#2: Project Merits. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� e,.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IJJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��s�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�-xe�� es.ao�(o�ie ia>FL�'�L IJ4 IV. TEXT REVISIONS Chapter IV presents specif�ic changes to the teit of the Draft EIR that a�e being made to clarifi- materials in the Draft EIR,in response to comments received during the public revie�� period or at the request of Cit�-staff. In no case do these revisions introduce "signif�icant ne�� information"as defined in C'EQA Gz�idelines Section 15088.5,including ne�� or more severe environmental impacts,ne�� mitigation measures or altematives, or information indicating that the Draft EIR is fundamentall�-or basicall�-inadequate. All revisions contained herein a�e minor in nature. Where revisions to the main teit a�e called for,the page and pa�agraph a�e set forth,follo��ed b�-the appropriate revision. Added teit is indicated«ith underlined teit. Teit deleted is sho«n in�. Page numbers coi7espond to the page numbers of the Draft EIR. Page 2 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: The Cit�-of Cupertino cuculated a Notice of Preparation(NOP)for the proposed project,��hich notif�ied responsible agencies and interested pa�-ties that an EIR��ould be prepared for the project and indicated the envuonmental topics anticipated to be acldressed in the EIR The NOP«as published on August 19,2011,and«as mailed to public agencies,organizations,and individuals lilcel�-to be interested in the potential impacts of the proj ect. The scopin�period,initiall�-planned to end on September 19,2011,«as eitended to October 5,2011 to allo« for further public comment. Comments on the NOP«ere received b�-the Cit�-and considered during prepa�ation of the EIR.A scoping session for the EIR��as held as a public meeting on September 8,2011. Public notices for the scoping session��ere mailed to approiimatel�- 20,000 households in the City,advertisements��ere placed in local ne��spapers,and the CitS-posted the Notice of Prepa�ation(NOP)and hearing notice on the Cit�-'s��ebsite.Notices��ere also sent to households in Santa Clara and Sunn�,-vale��ithin 1,000389 feet of the project site. A cop5-of the NOP and comments submitted during the EIR scoping period a�e included in Appendii A of this EIR. Table II-1, starting on page 9 of the Draft EIR,is revised as sho��n starting on page 137 of this chapter. Page 61 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: The Paslcand Recreation��'�'��-'r�°��-°�*�� (PR)zone coi7esponds to the approiimatel�- 1.1- acre portion of the site designated Pa�lcs and Open Space in the General Plan. This a�ea cui7entl�- contains a pa�lcing lot. The PR zone allo��s for the development of pa�ks,playgrounds,and recreational facilities,including agricultural uses such as crop and tree fa�ming. As��ith the General Plan Pa�lcs and Open Space designation described above,the site«as zoned PR at the time a development project��as proposed for a portion of the Ridgevie�� Campus a�ea. Figure III-4 on page 67 of the Draft EIR is revised as sho��n on the follo��ing page. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L IJS � � � � � rd � .� �--� a� w o � � � � � •� � > � � .�c-:"{ :. � -�'j°-- --__ ' :.� ��i - - _ �-��-'il� 41,. � � � bA � �aJ�.. i ' �. T �� .l � " ",� ,�t �' `.J '� w ��,,:� �„� --� '�Y; - �, ., .� � � � !�`� �t' - �.�j� - -- �f' Y "; �"• :�`� �, .a, � I I: _ "�,'�_ �„�. � -, � � �� ' 14 � I � - � --n � : � ��i' ' '«. o � ' i�.� —4 �: �• �" f:.1 .,: , �, :�;- � ,� :i '`yw' _ � �'I,i.� _ _ 9w � � _ � � : ' ]i �±�:� � p.., �; �fih��-c.�F��, �';'. � [�l�'�''{~��'�:i:e� � .i.. �.-`•- .:�'q�" ' r. '�. .� � I. .py y ��• ''�i�Y1E._I A i. � � .�...... • � �►: # �7* 2�,�.:+re�.' wr�!-�+�yJ{�-a �SC_ �. -C2' � .r�, c� •-,4�r�: .ti�_ ��+T �� •ti �.- 1: � -�fV �Y l � f��":,'.f��.-'ayy^f:j-� . . �., � � �� _ ._ _�. _�,�,:, ,, �- , �,;�;r- r+!:. � �.�..,� ,��. a' � � •�I_ - �` f '!. `*� .� :"3•':'� 1•�� - .� .��Y. asf�� r_ y�� 5':y��. ' �-.�• _..� �y�� y ' �� S�� f�' i�M ��_ R i[ii� �. �.�_>" � "� ■.. '�1:. � 2. 1 ' • r�� F�$ A• T -;� ..�. • ( �� e � { ,j ^�� .� �_J';� �-�t�`-.` p � r �� =F��[n �6' .'"i ..r�::"�j ��n�{'�; a ; :. ..,.� -- '�� c� ` �`-�L � �•i: S�" �. rwa-,r .. �?�'+i �WS' �_ y1.'�• ,�� ll ,�P:��. 'r7 •-�-�...• 0 � .. s:r^.c �..ir '�. .�� _��'� _�7... N _ ,°�" ��-� '.�. . _ � ,.�: .3 �� ;:� ',� � ��• .:�1 ��:R.. 7r.. $ I i� � r �r 'W -�� -.� -s:� '�1 � �' n�t L{ � �� f 'F �s � �lr-.• � �e�, 1,� ;� i� � �� :, � � i�Rw, I � - .� '� - - -�` a � .��.� 'r 4 _� � "'�. '�1 _�. . ,�T . ,I��• . �� 'd�� , � 'S � -.�� :-�-7 ��' .�� '� '1�� .:�c k. k M1 ��;i�`5�� ' � �alcx- � 4�. I�� ` ''I .r; �'.� _ �� , : *�• :_:_eR�. [:,_�._s �t�.� �.t�}ir�`��yl_�' ��•`:�••'-s �' . • . �-$srr:w.rr•a.nrs. '�,�„�s�r:�'� � "�.� ,� •,asd��'.s.s.�na�� 4[ �'.. i tl�� /��r�� '�I ,4�I '�^`� ��_p:��C��- +��-�„� .--_'--��:x�C��- � % nF P� �'f/e ��'+ "� �'�N's'�� •.� �� ;+��' �� . � .��. � ' �`� � ��;ar `�rr`�- �' �;p��.`•�k;%r �+y : ?}�'� � '.�' �,,�e.: •.5, .:� :b?!�:� ��' .�Y - �k ��'a`:'•..�'�: �� - n�l. ��c �r �� . •�. 1. �'�� '`� � �� ^-�`r 1� ��yy.i�.� �:•':��r`t�' �r�,.� [_�,+. � � ��, ' � i `� �'i� R�'• - r�`�._�� .. � •:. �y. � ' f :�: _�•- r� 3 '� �� ., ;�,��`��,��:` "� �� _ � � .: r s;,� � .��►. �'. ' '� �' �. +�� x . .�. , �. �; _ �. � r�-�� ,� :��`;;`'�r"!:,:r �e�,' , ��' �' �` �;�' ^::an.�'F� �l' • "��• , Z�,, ,:�`;e:� ` . .,�y:�:- �-'�u. � �.�'� .� �'A � - 4T�� k �'� �_ F��.1 /� �'� ��s 4'� ::Y' . Ti ,r;.t'• Y./,". ♦ii 'i ,�`. a'� . r . +� . r �i'n �F • .'!�'L��y, ' �T'�. i. � i T�_'�'i � �� '.� -�.�•,�x��i�r" 4 M,':.. _ � �� ,. _ )l' �� ,� F .!�� •y{� ' , �¢^ � .r r}� �k�� -. ?� .. ��s: - �'{�- .:{�r l R+�{;�i�� .�� A Iti�?�'" +.� +�� . - -i '.[� � � . . '�}:�� { '.'.i� "�,�F ' n� yt -`:� :/ � ;`��: �.R�".- 4f � 4 ��{~3f� irT�. � • t�' -'`:H�'-'?''� ��] I :� + � �p�i�� .: ti-.a�"�f;h�� { � •�,4�`, -� .7r"'_� . �r+c .I � - � Ni �' `�� . ✓ ' � :�•. � 1 •I' �{�- I��. �� ` �.., � f�;��. ' �■ • _ ! ��. ! 1 '_'9` r�r' ±�'r..°�� 1;�i. �,�" '� _�x, � _f -� � � 1�" �. �.�, a ..�� I � ' _�.. �*� �.` `'� � g�`'o i .,.. i :f `..__ `�i� �.�,^ �+�� - �� .�ti � Y� t -- r. T��• '•' ��i • - ;;�� . '��,., � 3va - '�+�-�-r.�.r,.r,�� r ^ -� � � ��....Y.� •- -_� ^ -ix. � r:�'.��1l1�►^�►Ilt � ;� , � '� _'�::. . �+�, + �� 's. �.��s: ',�+�� y��;%l �� .� � l� ��Sa� � •�-y dr.a?� .��.�,` ` � a �'� ' _ " `F� . � �,. �d� �%; •.a � 's�"'�-��'R �-�'� .1. �'��:':.t; ' •r"d t�h��^�-r -�� E� ��-'+x�.. �� •� � •' ��_ , � 1 � � � =� �ki.�.il� �,. .. �•�.14: r ' �� - o .i � I y .�5� � -� � I`�' -' _ _ _ - - ° ° - - ° ° ° - °� ..i� F- �. {� ,r> � _- - - - - - - - - 1� { 96 � � �� Z'• m'i h c M M � M � M M M � � 7 �m 1 - � y� S 1,�� J 'r�' g ' , , _ , _ 'O �i -q _ ..,�,. -�: k� +�' � :�L�_r yt" 3 r m ¢ � n n � a u� u� u, ¢ � v' � z a o S z � , ��-'� �� - ,:� - -- _ _ - - z z z z � � ti .=��y'r' '�: y' / � . .'� w � � M � ' M � � � � ' � � � _� � r e i� - - - - - - - - - ~ S �1� � ;' z z z °q1 •~ Z .. ��.�' �� * '-�- •�: _ '!'[ N Q ¢ ¢ 4 ¢ 4 ¢ 4 4 4 ¢ ¢ ¢ � .�� `.� y�-�� :. 'i z � z z � z M z M � � z z z w � �-':r,'-°- ��' ��.� � - - � _ n a � -- — w••i• �. � ��'� - m d a � �? � ° � i `•� . . . J " d. - tt •'�;�' . ,. , .� t� � �� ' �;r-' - .� . 3�•:�, , � i a = N = _ °� � = �a N �� s �� q .,�" �- m a = a > - - - - _ �,; � �� =��t � =r, ��'� � v � � r-; � .��x��;'=�-�- f'� -r � _ - _ ¢ a - _ � � o � �- �° � � - y za � � zz - a � a - N � :�� .=,��• , . .. :�! �,�� t � .��=�=r ,�� o w � � ,, � a � � � � o 0 o w M U � �+J W � Q J W ° � o w � � E�� zW� y m w p rJ y,w• ,� �[-�, W i." O �c�.. 0 CC �+ °W� G� ..U. +��' eC `� `� `� q� � �.."'". V� V� V� F�k a �� W � � W � �] a �i�'i; y 0 �--� � � '�y �-I � Y � �� w o � � � � � ° � o ,� � �a� �� C � � � �3 ° � w a N � N � O ,� � � N vi � N � p y�,� .�� N P" N � � p '0 � '�, � �6 ,3'�' y,� � �O 'a � G, ,� C� V 0 '� �� , '� Q � .� � O 4� � U . � �p W N � '� ��, pq � � N 0 � � � O � � N .y � � ,S"y � 7..� y ,� N � � � ,� � � o :a `� ;� � � N � � � o � � � c�n 3 � �� a� � �' � '"� � � `� � �' �' � � � � a� ur � � U �� ,�' � a�i � � � k� a� �, o � 3 � � P� °"� .� ,� U � � ,� � � � P-' � � � ,� a�i a�i ,� o ,o °�' �' � U U cC o �� ° �H � �� o � � °��' w �o,y -� ,� �,-! �' o � a� y � 3 � M �' O � 0 b4 N N r� +�' U p ¢i`+a cd '� G N � Y y cd U N + a� � � � � � '� ,x � ,�, a�i �' o �, `� a� a� � � o °? � . � �, � �a -a QI� � � � � ° � a� U ,r� � � �� '� ;� � .� � v� � c� � � � a� v� � � � � � °� � � � � o � � � � � � � � � � � � 0 u� cn� � � � O '� ¢,�' � � � °' � � � �, ° � � 0 3 � � � � � � � � -a � � ° o �' .� o � °� � 3 �� P.�° -a o a? -a � �, .°°,-� � �� o � .� �� ' k� � a� � � � � � ur � � ° � o � ° �� a�i � .�' �' CC � � '� � � U '� � N �"'' r� �." O s� W .� � �"'' p � � N P-i � � � � .OO 3� �' N W � � W �; � � r3 '� N .,ti C/� '� r� 3� O cd � s�-i � � � ,-r�-I � O � � N ,y.r�.' �, L: ,sr' ,s' '�y ''�"_' � �p N N p `� � � V ,�rj. ,�" ° :� a� � � .� � � �� o� � �° � [� � ° � a�i � � �� o � � � � � o � o P. � � � � � .� o �o a� r' Q a�i �° � � ,� o � cd O :`� ,� r�i� U � ,~-� c� 7r�- O ,'_"-� Y '+' 3"i N O �' U `i' � N N Y � � � ,� � � +' V U Q''''� m N cC � c� N '-a V V .i U "�,-I' � ,ri � b�D O N 0 "� � ,y.r�.' � ;� .S"y Qr � ,�' � ,ri ,� � ,-a � � � r�i� a� U � � � � .� �� a� � �' w° � a� � o .� ,� �o �,� U � .� � o s� �� °� � � � H a� .� ° o � o ,� y '� �� o a� .� � a�i � � � � ° `� °�' � � �� U � � � o °�° � o P"� � °' .� �' �� 3-�a � � P. � � � �? � W O �i �-' �-' � � � � � 7--I � N � Cd � � O Y N � O p L�+ � �c�d "a H T � .� cyd .. `� �,� '� �y R�,�" cd r� L�. � �'� N +� 7-+ y..i � .� � k� '� o `� � `� � '—' '� o � � � o� ur m o o ° 3 U �a � ur �' M � � '� � �' ,x P. � � ri� �' � �' �U w � � � � � P� � � m .� o .� �, � � � � � -a '� o '� o � �° ur�,� � s� o � � � � � ,x .� � a�i o � '� �a�i � � �� w oP� 'mP� w c� o � � � � � � � � � � � � '�" o � +3 � ° ° � . �„ P, m � F-� c� f� c� m � U � F-� c�l F-� .� U � � v� c� � 3 0 � � i�. � O e�C � � eC a� � � `� v� v� v� � a �3 � � � 0 � � � � .. � w ° � °° � � � � � � � � �� o z � � � .� � � � .a � � � � � o � �WO � � � �� w o � v�, �, ,� � ° o '� � � ° � ,°�� U � v' � , U �' °pP. � r'� o " v o � � °' � a� eC `� � °' w � �[� � � �� P. �o� � 3 � Q O � F� U O cC '� 7-r O �+ vi ° � � � F"r "a � .N `'� �! � U a `� '� �N Y � e� �3 .� 'p `� `� P"� � O � � i `U�' � � � � P.�r, �. � � H O � U � O N R� '� � p O � � � Y 0 � d G� N �" s�-� � P. P",y: 4� C� F"r P. �' � � .. � ' p P. 'Z '� ' N eC o � P.� ,y � � � ,�o Z °��°-a � o � � U � �" a "� r� G' E� cC a� ,"� � G' S. � � �,O �' N �, .�' 0 p�p �'" �' � 0 � �'�" p � 0 � � Q z � �� QI O�.� � � � H W ¢+N � P� a� Q � o _ V�1 W �'7 ° `� ,� U .� 0 � °� � � � °� � °� °� `� � o -a � P.� � w� I-�- �� s�-� pq � QI "G� '� 0 ,� ,�' �I c�, 0 � �, � E� � Z �" � � O � � � � Py '� '� � 0 N C� O N 6" � F� �' � � �' � � � � �' � � ,�' � i''° I�I .� P-i � cd O � O � y„� ,� v Q aWi � I-� M m '� S�'�" ."r"�' V� � O R� �"a Vy� N � � � ¢ � � Q"� Z .� � � � H � �r3 U � ,� H Q.� U N ¢ o F � � � � aW � � w ,~°�.c7 °��' ' � H ° � � � � H ° � � w ° E�� 00 zW� y M w p rJ y,w• ,� �[-�, W i." O �c�.. 0 CC �+ w a � � .� � � � q� 7 ..�"i V] F�k a �� W � � W � �aj ��.. y� y -a O� N N � O � N U � M �' cC � � V � � � �a � y � � U y '� c� � � � 3.-I � � y O ({�`"� �, � "'a � � �n' Y "�,-I' Y � �+" � O � � �/!�� +'a � �Sy � � S��" Y N � � � O ,� �6 U y � U N �-r �./ CC � CC O � '� rr� �' � � "r"" ^ `� � � Vl � V� CNC �A O CC O � L�-I a ,� -a O c�C U c�i F�+-' r�i, � � P"o c��C � � °�' '�" '�C � �' + � ,�' �'aOn� A �v, � -� ,`"�.Q c�i w N ��--! � a+ cd .� �. U � '� v' U L: �'i ,�d W r� Y cd � � b4 cd � rr-� � � �' U l' �C � � 0 7�-+ � O � � � CC N Vl N � �I ',�,-i V� F'I� � bA N /� N � 0 `� '� bA +� Li ,� 7--i b4 R� ,ri h'I "a N �.i � ° � U � � �� r'�,° Q-'�� o � .��' a� �-a � �'C � � ,� o � o � '� � � o � � �' � o � �' �° � � .� 3 a� � � � � � � a� � Y Y °' P� Y �' � 3 � � v � c�'�i � � � .� � Q ° �, � � � �, � .� �' a� c� G' � � `� � ° � ° G' ° Y � ,� � �-a � y � .� �^�' �" � � °'' � � � � � � � � � � ° � � �� °' � � �� O � O � y ^Vl � � � '�-I � �--! � 0 `� � � � � � �I � 0 � �� '�c� 0 '-� � �'y � � O '� . Y ."~,-I' O �. cd '-a � �+ 9 N '-a cd O 0 '� y v"+' 7-i O ,r Y � 7-+ � � �"'' cJ � � �I O � � � �"'' ,� N H �--' O N � R��"' .� Q '." U � � N y �' N N �' � � o c� Q M � � 'd Q., � � +� � �, �' a� � � �+Q M � � '�'� � � c� U � a�i a�i a� � �+� � '� °� � � m c� � c� � ,�' � �C �' � Y a� k� �, a� � � � >C � �° '� +��' �+ � � �, c� � ,� � � � � o '� �, � a? a� +g 3 � � .� � � �' o �' '-a � ,� .r'. '3 � s.°'a �" Q O ,-`�. ..�. bA � ,� -a a'"n o s.°' '�' �' o ¢� ..i c� c� s� � �.� � ��- � � � � o o � � �� -a �� u�,� � � ~ ° o � '~ o '-� � `"°' '-� � � � � � � ' �' Vl N �.y '-� u y� V ,� U O � N "~" i'" � 7--I Vl N N '� `3 y 7-i cd R� "r'" �' ' �, Q � U +' � ,�' '� O � � O cd R�� U �1 a�. � �'' Y � o � � o a� � o � �, c� m � o �, � � o0 0 � � � c� o ° U a�i `� � o cv � � o � � W �t � � o �' 3 ' c� Y '� � o cv o a� � a�i � ° � �� N � � �� p � � a� 3 � . � � ,� 4° � .o 0 0 � � o�o P.,� � °�' -a G' �C s� ,�' C '� a� � � O � O N 4-� p .� �U r O � 'a cy�C c��C � � O G' N � N >,'�' Q"'� N N U U r+�-� N 7-+ O +' O '-a ..�r O s"' r�i� v � 7�-i b4 N Q O N O ,~-� R�� N .� � N N cd � Y � ,� ° a� s� a� �, a� R� � ....�, o � ,-a p� � :� ,� .� � a� � ,� �' � '� � ¢' � �' 3 �, o w, Q 'a �o � � o � '-a ' � U � � � �, � � ... � .� �� ,�' �' �, ,��., �, a� � �' � � � o � � �' �� ,�' W ra Y Y y �/j � Ly O CC .�--� N � C/� ,�/ F"-I y � '� Li i.-I � N �"+ '� N C/� ,-� bD 0 � �^ 3.-I � F"-I �--� bD N O � � .y"". N N r�i �j � W ��., ."�.J' � � � O � � N ,�y N 0 ;� Y P +' R� bA U cC A: r3 �. 'a N A: F�y" N O O r- � U �� '-a � � �, '" � c�, o ,� o 'O �'� ,�' � a� � 'm � a�i � � o � � H o ,� 3 W o ,� � � °' U � ,� � p � � � 3 � .� � ° � � o � a' � � ,� � °' v' °? � � � ° o � � � 'C � � ' ° � o �. 3 � �o o � � �'' a� � .�; a� s� �, � � �, � � o o� � �. '� y �� '. � �'. � � � w � � � � �3 � ri� a� �,� .o � � � ,o �� ri� � w .� � � ai � u+P� � � ri� � �� .� u+ .� N O � � N Sti ~/ � CC� Y P Y C� Y cR� Z � 0 y � Y O CC� Y ��-u-I � m r�i� � 7-i � cC m L: 7-i � '� bA '� ^ � � O � �' N N � � � m L: 7-i .{U--� � �y FO�I 1�""�--I � 0 � y � � � y Q-I 0 Q O � � � 0 O e� � � � � � � 0 �-I � � y Q-I @ F� Fil C.� � U W .� .� F� � CC O �"I 3�-I Q-I 3�-I W F� W �--� CC .� Vi Li '� C.� W '� F� � CC O Q-I �I�I � �.q � 0 � � � � � � � � � ,�" �l a�n� � � � 0 � � o �' �, �^ c� U � '� � .. o c�n o � � � � "'� � ,� � e�C U � '� �� , � �' V V ,r-I � O U � �� ,� � a O � p � ° �' � � � � ' � � �--� � ¢i Q-''a � � � P. N � c�i � �, H U P-i � � � .��r �� v � ,� � �--� ,+� � � � � � � CC � � m � � � �' � � � � P. '�' c�C �� p, H z � i�." � �' P-'� � �'� o � W � ,� a� °� � W v� x - � �� F�+- Q u�v� O ; w� p `� '+-� � ° O '� � 0 6� � � � � � � a � � � i..i o, o o -a o .� v o w � v� v� �i � � �± � ¢ � � � .� P. � � �� oo . � �°� � H H ° .� a a o ° W s a w � a; E�� O1 zW� y M w p rJ y,w• ,� �[-�, W i." O �c�.. 0 CC �+ w a � � .� � � � q� 7 ..y'". V] F�k �l a�n� � z W � � w H �aj ��.. O a,' F"r o U � O � � r� � "a �-' Y r� N '� � O O O,Wj m � � cC � � �" � "� c��C '� F"r a v, �� ay �� "� � c> � � c> � "a �a � O N ,r-'� O 0 � ,b4� 6 a� � Q � � o � � o w ° � � o o '� � � O � � � � � � � � �°, � 3 W .� ;� � � � � `�' �' � � � c�n � � ° o � � � , � .� � ,� � 3 �� a� o � �' �� w � � -a .� 3 [� o � � P. o � ° P. ° � � � � .� a� � � � � ,.� � �� o � � ° �' -a � a� � ~ ° � � � � Q .�� ,��. � �' � o � � � � � '� U '-a ,�' � °' � � N � � +-' � � cC U Cy/� N 0 � Vl C� � 0 '� ,--� Q-I � L" Q N � "a � � � o sti s." '� � 3 � � � Pr.� �, � � �y y � y '� �""� C� L�-I � � � � L�-I L�-I P-I Q M � �� Y �� i�+ � .a � � � Q , � a{�� ' �' o F°, � �' � "~" ,S'y . U � Uj � U F'-I � ^y � y y � U � � ,�' � `� � � 0 ° � � � o � ,�' � � � c�"i � '� � � �, w � s� � � y � s� .� � .�' � '.a � 3"� � +' � ' � .� � � � H �-I � � � � � � �-I � � � �-I � � � Y � �y o �' � .� °' �' � o � °' � O o N � �, ,�,, -/-� m .,.��' p �' ''3 s� � Q � '� � P-'� ,.�"' � � �' � a� � "� '� '-� � c+'i �" ,� '� � � w � � � � y � � � � � � � N 0 0 � 3.�-I `i� � � 'a � � �,° � o� o ,� � � 3 �.,'� ,�, �' o� o �/ 0 � � 7..� � � � � �p--� W '�" � � F"r N �-'' � N � F"r c� �r '�r' +'7 � 0 �y/� cC � E'� 0 CNC 0 'S�j' � � y O � ��^ � 4--' O a W ,--� .�y Y 0 C� � 3'"� � Y .rl � 0 W �, o � ,� � ?�, °` �' � � a�i o a� � � � � .� G� �, .o F-� . .� v, � a� v, �, a� Y � G� � .� C/� y..i � 3.-I N � C/� � � .� � N � � � Q � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � O U � � Y � . � � ~ � � � ~ � � � � F-� � 'a� F-� . . ' � .� � 'a� U cC o � � i�i � O e�C � � � y � � `� � � a a�n� � � � 0 CC '�, P,�, .r"'. � � ��.�. N � '� � � � ti ,� ;-a � � .� � � U � y � � � � Y � y � V evC 'o� � � � � a 0� O � � o � ~ � +,-' U ,r � � ~ C� Pr N r�i� � �� F O y � �� O .a v � �, `� ,.� ' N � � CC �." � � � � � � o � o � � � "" � � o � '" U a z � � � a�i Q-' � Q o a � � .� w� .. o � � o� � ' 4--i H° rl `� � � U `� � ¢� � � �i � � � � � o � o w ~ v� v� � ,��. � p a � ,� -�-� -�-� �„ c�i � � s �W � � � � � 0 c�C o F �w � F-� F-� � � P� ,��. o a�, a E�� O zW� y w o V y,�• � �H� w � o �. �c�.. o � a� °WW a� .� � � � � Q°� � � � a� F c�'�e a GA� � U � W � � Q W]H �a; �' � oa� � � � a� � ° � �W a�i o � � � 0. � � � � a� o � s F a O '3 ,-a � �. ,.r".i �N O ,r-'� . +' � 7-r P+ � n' " R� cC � ,� � p y�„ .�' p �a'7 � N v S��" .� � ''T'6 � .0� Q-I 3.�-I .� '� y � � �r � N � .a O � �t� W CC Yr � � � ^ V�i N �C O '"�r Sti Sti '�'i 3-�r Sti � � .ry W � 0 � W 0 ,ri „r,� MI L: O � O N .� � cC ,0 � � � Q'' � � 00 cC N � � � N � � b�D � � � 7-�-i � � N a/ p '3 �" "a � � c� � N '3 �' N O O Cd �+ �--� Y U � cd r/� '� . ,rJ O � p � U �-" � � ,i: � ;-i V� N N "C +--� `� "a °U^ ,.�r".� � N � .� y„� Y 7--� �--� cd O F." N v� �' � o °' � :_;,� �� a�i ° � w, � � � a� � � � � o � `� i o � � � � � �' � " � � � � o � y cd ,7 ^.� ,�' Q W N � 0 cd cd U C�C � � � .^' p 40y '� � F"" ,� � ', � � P""a ,r c�C N � .� � -a 4cd � N '� N � 0 V � cUC rr-� '� � O �-y S O � � � � � � r� � y � � � W � Iti � � � � � � ,`��. � � � � � � °� � o a� o y a� :� � U � H ° .� P.,O � � ° � -a � � � ,� ,� � � .� � N ��° � o �cn,� � � � ° � � � ,� a � i � �� w .� m �' m � �" Z � ° .�'�'� .�' � � .� .� 0 }'3 � � � � � � � � � � � °' p..,°. � ,� o �� a��n �•�° ,a�n � � . N � � U � � N y Cy/� C/� � � Y W � C~/� ,0 � � � o �° � o H, � � � .a�i � � � � � P�, � �' o.� � ,� o � � �' '�' � o '� o � � � Q `� � o � � o '-' � � '�'p P-' c� m � � � � W � .� o � �' W �, 'a � ° � o � °? °' '-`� � Q" o � v� a�i � � � � o �'o� � � � G� o �n � � ��, '-a a� � � o� 3 � ,",� ur O � c�"d' u � � (� • 0 `� U Q-I � � `� O � � � � O U Y � � � � H .� � O U � 0 � �C � � �-I .�-�-I 0 ¢I � � � c�C ,��r O � N Py ,r � � �U i= ,��r�� O � � S■ � O e�C � � � y � � `� � � a a�n� � � � 0 � � � a4 � � -� `� -a .� o � o � � � � � � � � '� .� s-� c� �`� -a a� o c�i � � � � � � N O N �,' cC o0 �" ,�`"'—, �' � cC � � � � ti iyy U y� O `� � � � ✓ � U � � Y O O �-I �-I �--I �--I � �C o °° � � a° o ° � � � � �a �a �a � � � � � � � v � -a o � � W � � � � � -a � -a � � a��i a��i a��i � � i i � � � eC a� � � � � � � a� a � � � a� � � � � � � � � k� o � o ,o � o o � � � �• ° � � � �" � � � � � C °� °� � � � ' � i..i o � � � o a a� o W � '� � '� r� � s� s� s� � � � � �o � � e� �� a�i a� w W Q P� � o o � o � � �3 �3 �3 � � � � ;� ;� � � o o � o P� c� P� o � � � � �' �' °� o °� � e•" +' � ° '�7 �' � � � � � a4 �' a4 a� a� a� o o � � � � � O S� o �n ;� `n � a� � � ° � a� ° c'�'i c'�'i c'�i o o � �a � l � � U C ' 00 00 H H "a "'a � eC �' ° � ,..�'� � f� °of� � � � U � U � � � � � � � � � 0.�1 � � � � � s�y. W V� f� V� Q �I � �, �, � � w S�. .� 0 '-a '-a'-a'-a'-a'-a '-a � '-a � '-a� '-a '-a '-a '-a '-a '-a '-a '-a '-a '-a H p L� '? N �J �J �J �J �J �J �J � ,rJ � �J -a 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' 'r'' � .r. � � � � � � � � � a� � a� � �. � � � � � � � � � � q z � W �� ° �° �° �° �° �° �° � �° � �° � �° �° �° �° �° �° �° �° �° �° � � � o o � � � � � � � � �� W� .. c.� � � � � � � � � � � � � ' Ho � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � ¢� r; N a� v� a� � v� v� v� � v� � � � v� P� � a� � v� � v� � v� � � v� � o� �" v� � �w o°o a�i o°o o°o o°o o°o o°o � o°o �,o°o �,o°o � o°o a�i o°o o°o o°o o°o o°o o°o o°o o°o o°o .« Q � � NNNNN oN � N � N s� N � NNNNNNNNN �w � � � 3 0 � � � � � � � f� � W � W � U � � � � � � � � � � � � O �w � F-� v�, � � • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ° a�, a E�� zW� y w o V y,�• � �[-�, w i." O �c�.. O p�w G� � � � � ce 7 Q�k I� b�A� � � � W � � w H �aj ��.. O a,' � � o U � � �a "a ,� ..'�r N W w � U � � � cd �6 O N 0 � 0 .3 '0 �, cC � � Uj yy � Y y Y � � °� � °� ° � � � � 3 � o a� .a� � � � � o �' � �,� � �� 4° � ,� � � �� o � � o � � � � � � � � � � � °? � � ° a� � F � � � � � � Y V � �--' ;� N 'L"" Li -� N 4""i O F�"+ ,� C �" � � � '� CC O 'r'"i� '6 O � Q" O � � � U �C O � � � � � � � �y ,� O ,r O ,r-I � r� r�i ¢' � b4 � '6 O � ,r,-I-' N ."~,-I' � 7-r � cd cd y � O O � � � � � � N � � � '� '� � � � � � � � � W � .� � � � o°oa� � � M � � Na�n a� � � c� -a � �"'� V� 3�-I 3�-I ~ � � ,.�"y � Z p � y U � U � � � � � � � � DI � � � � � 0 � � � � � � � � � ,�" �l a�n� � � � 0 � `� a� + � � � � � � °�' �+ � o � � a�i 0 � � a�i a�i � o � � � � �' � � � � � � � � � � � ° � 2 ' •a � a a� U •a ,� � .� o �, � � � �' � a� a� � � � �' � � � '� '~ w ~ o � � � ,.�� o ,� w � � °' °' � a � � � � � � � � � � o � � " '� � � � �. CC � �M � � � � � � � � � � � m w � a� � V � �y�,� I� � � ��>y � � � � � � y O � � � � � O � � y� Y � � H 0 � O O '� '� � � � � 0 c� � �" 0 � � ° � � � � � � 0.�10.�1 � � � ' a� � ,°'�•'� � °qo°o � `� � '� o � � oo � � o o � � � � � � � .� c� � a O p � ,� � � � � o � � o o �' o � o � a�i � � � a�i � a� � � •d •a •a � � � � .� � � � �o 0 3 ,� � eC � � ° o � o o � � � � 0.�10.�1 � � � � �� -a ° H � � U y U � � � p �i �? � "� "� O � 'O 'O � � � � � � � � � V O V � � � O �+ q z �' s o o �. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � a� ,-a a� P-, 3 � �� o � �� Z �v� v� � � � � � � � � on.� � . P. o a� ... � x W �c ,� ,� ,� ,� � � ,� a� o � � o � � �zl � � � � � � � � � � �' � � ° �,� �� °' � w� „ :� � o O � O O o o -a o 0 0 0 0 � -a >, p� u� � � ,-�a ;� � A a° r; N � � � � � � � � � v� � v� � � � � � � M �' � � � � a4 � � i.y N a� �n r� vi a� �n �n �n �n �n a� � P-i N +� ,�'' •� � � �W � 0 0 0 � 0 0 � ✓ � � � � � � 0 � 4--I �-�-I �.Vy y �-I ��y--I G Q W V] 00 00 00 00 0 00 '� 00 '� '.{ti bA V] 0 F"-I CC � ¢ � � � N N N � N ��N � 0 � o � � � � � � o � .� � � '� � � � � � �w � � ,� ,� ,� -� ,� oo ,� v� '�' v� p� v� v� v� v� v� ,� p� � � � .c�n� p � c�n � ° F v� U y � O cJ a N � F-� • • • • • • • • • • • • • [-'�-� W [� -a �, .� p � '��' a E�� N zW� y w o V y,�• � �[-�, w i." O �c�.. O �, °W� V � CC Q�w � � ce 7 F�k a �� W � � W � �] a �! �� .a � N �, '0 � cC N � �>-I N O d' a'� N Y O � � �' Y C/� ' fti � � Y C/� F'y H p w U � F"" � O � � �CCi� � N � � O O y � � � O W � � � w a � � � .� � "~,-I' �� ' O N � � � ��+ s-� p N C� � '��! � � '3 � p N � 7--I ,�" N y,�,� 7--I � V U F'r r+�-I r�/l � N y .a "� .0 � �' �� o � � °' � ° i � `'° o � °' ,� � �°a `� -a � � � �' � � �' .� ,� �� .�' � � a � ,� � y � � � � � � � o � � o � .� � � � a�i � � � � °' � � -a � � � � � � �, ��, � o � .� o � � � .� o � � � � � � � oU �' � � � ° °�' � .� � a� a� � o ... �� a� 3 a� � �. ' � '� v, � � � O a� P�-� c� '� � m � m ° F-i a�i � o � �� v �' � '� o � � �+'� s.°�� ' ,�' a/ Vl N ,� � U 's:: 7-N-I 0 C�C 's:: '� rl '� N � ,N O N .� .� -a .� '� � Vl C� � 0 y N 'd ,y� F," Fr" � V ,� W N N � ,� . s� � 0 V '-a ,7 �" '-a s� V O N cC � Y O Cd c� O N Y m O '� c� ,7 m m 7-i O Y c� N O N ,S: �: � � �--� cC a� � a� � � � � � ° �' o � � �' s� .'� � � o o a� � � o � w � •a /�/� � o C F� �, .• '�-i � � �--� U 7--I ^ � � � 0 � 0 C.� N Ir> � '� �"-I � N . N r� 'y""'i � '� � � � � � ° � � � o x+ � � w � s� �,' � o p o � o -a �; m y '� � � � a� ° �" � � �, � a� �, � � ° o � � 'a .� � '+'7 'a '�" ° � � a�i o .� o o `� � � � a� �' U � o � � a� � . v� '� '� a� � �--� �°�I ° � � � -a i .� � o � � �, -�a � � � � � "� � � � � � o '� � ° � ,o � o -/-i Sti Y N � C}'/� � Y � ,S-'y O � ~ "~" N ,� Sti O y 4a ,�' 'L: ,.�y. r� '� O +� C,j � ,.. '�" � "� �"" Y N y..� O O N y� o a�i o +� � a� o � o � � o � a� � o � -a � � o �' � a� � � � ,� � a� �+-� � o a� a� a� 'C s.. � a� p v � ,� � � �' y w �� ' � . � a� � � v a�i � � � � o �' c� .� �' � O � +' � � � +3 F�-' � ��-' }-.-r '-a i""-i � OO � Q � r3 � N � � � � � ,r"-� � � � O �"~.J' � �' o � � ,�' � � o � o ,x o � � � °� � � c�i �' o � a ,� � °' °' � .� � a� � °3 0 '� w � � o a� �. � .� a� �' � '� � � o -a � . a� .� �; � ° '�' � � � �' � � '" ,� ° ° � � ,� o ° � o � '�" a� o �� o �� .� � -a a�i � � ',�" � � °'' � ,� � � �a c� � c�i ° � 0 � � � � � s-� � � o �' .� � ,� ° � ,�' ° '� � � � � � � Y '� �.i ��r^, '��yy �--� 0 � .�..� � � •^I � �y � rJ� � Q � � � � � �� rl � � � � � O � � � O � � �I ��/l � 0 Ft� � � � �. ,� a� a� �. � o �. � � U � � a� P, � � -a � o � `� -a � a� -aa�i � � U � �' � � o � � o � '� o ° � '� � °'-�' � a� � ,o o � ° � ° a�i � o o y � -a o ° � � � � a� .�' � � � a� �, � oo �' .� � � � � � � �' ,�' o � .�' �,�-' a� ° .�' �' �C o � .�' �r�/� a� ,�y � yy � °� ,� '+'� � � 3 a� o s� o � � �+ � �3 0 �' �+�-' �� °� w ^ � � � .^ F"-I CQ .� , � Vi � 3�-I � � y O '�--I � � F'r � � � �i--I "'a � � � C�C �'" � � � O � o °? � �' Y a� � -a ,� � � �, .� ;� � 3 � �' o �' �' � a� W � � �' �' � a� oo ,� ° � � � �� o ��' °' � �,�-' �' � o � � � `� Q�' o � a�i .� 3 cn .a o � � � � o 0 o�+ O `'� a� ,o o � � a� � � � � � � � o�+ � � ,o o � � � �+ G�y� N Y � � U � � '� '�= 7--I �ri � ;� U � �-r F"-I "� "� � C/� c� '� Vl � ,S,y ,S_", � � � �+�-I O r..l Uj F"-I 3.-I Vi ."�" O � "� , N 0 '� � .�" N �--� �j ,� �y Sti O � �` � '�--I C� �ti rl y '� N .�--I �i--I . 0 N �I Vi � 3'y C� N � rl rl N 0 � �I Z ^" 3 °? � � � � i � ,� .� � � � ,� -a � � a� o � `� a�i o °�' � � � -a � °' ��, � � � � 4° U .� ° W � -a � � H � P� H 3 5 a�i � � F�+- `" � � � `" -a o � � � � 5c� H � 3 c,�". � i�. � O e�C � � � y U � CC .4".. ,�"'. � a �3 � � � 0 � � � � � 2 ",� w e�C \ � � , � U CC `� � � � '�' e� �; o � ' � � e� � � � x°• � � � � z � W .� � � w� „ J E 6� rl M cJ '"IL° �.y N Q W ~ � 6 � � � o W � U�i W � � O C�J a w � a; H�� M zW� y w o V y,�• � �[-�, w i." O �c�.. O o p� ? � �' `� F-� F-� Qa ia a b�A� •" ~l �l �"w � � W]H �aj �� O al o� � � � � Q W �--� '•��. � 0 � � F-'p'�, "a ,--i Li � U � ,� N �� a � � 0 0 cd O � � ', �� F7 � � � � �� Fy � a�. °' bA..�'r N N � O � �� N k1 � '� � '� Y � � C� i � � ~ � U � � � � i � ° � � � ° �" ° �, .}�.�' �' o ,o�n � � � I Y-i �--� Y Y N � Q � � � •� � � � � � � � � .. U � s� � '� c� I � � � � � � � � � � CC '� -� � cC "a � � � � � � �. � � � � o � � o � � � . �'-a � � � -a ° � �� ' � �' � o � �� ,� � � � -a -a � � ,o '� � � � o �° � � � � � � � y � � � � � � � � y � � � � � � � � � � � � � � o °? � . `� .. � �' � Uw � � o � � � � o �� o � � � +� ° ,� � � � P-'� �' U �+/ � � � 0 � � � � � V � F-� F"r � N W �", .� o -a � � � � � G� ,r�' � N U 0 N N � �M '� � V� � � +�-' Uyj � � Vy� N � Vy� � � F"+ � � V H U H � "a /� � � � cC '� y � � � � .� OI � � 0 � O c� N 3F� � P, � I � � � o � � ° e�'C � � � `� v� v� ' � � � � a �� o � .. � � .� � � � .� � � � �� N � � i o d s°� `� � � 2 � � o �� o � `� I w U � � �" Pr �--� � � p� ,� �� a c�n � � � , m �' U � � � � � a� cn � o �o o �-�y � � `� y ° �� w � � � � �c o ° � � O cd N �'' ¢ 0 cd 7-�+ cd '� �� ~ �r � N � � � � � .� � F�I � p ,�" � � � � V . � cC � � O � �� C F O � Uo � � � U L+ � 'r" v L'�"" '� cC O '-a U cC '� � '�' � H � 0 � O W cC � � � � � S" Q.,� "a P� +� � � � G' cFi ,ri -a � � N ' 'a z � •� � � c�C � V � 0 � '� ' r�L _ � W N � �""-r �j� � N � � U ' � E o •• H 0 .y i� .,��r H � � U � A 6� � a+ �•y N O r�i� � „�" �M V ,� ''� � v Q ai � V� U 7�-i � V� �0.S�" � ' ¢ G� N N � � � � � � � � ,� � �, o W � ��-' a� �W �, � � � � > � � � � >' o � a�, a LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS The numbering of one subheading on page 102 is revised as follo��s: �North Tantau Avenue. Apple also proposes ... Figure III-17a on page 105 of the Draft EIR is revised as sho��n on page 145 of this chapter. Page 111 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Currently, Route 81 accesses Pruneridge Avenue on1�-in the eastbound direction from northbound North Wolfe Road,��here it then turns left onto North Tantau Avenue, and then right onto East Homestead Road to��a�ds the Cit�-of Santa Cla�a. With the closure of Pruneridge Avenue, Route 81 ��ould continue to tra�el north on North Wolfe Road,tum right onto Vallco Pa�lc��ay, and left onto North Tantau Avenue,��here it��ould connect��ith its current route. Figure III-18 sho��s the eiisting and proposed route of Route 81. As pa�t of the proposed project, a ne« bus stop«ould be established at the northeast c�uaclrant of the intersection of North Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Bouleva�d. Other ad�justments to bus stops and signage mav be rec�uued to accommodate the reroutin� Page 136 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: 14. Construction and Phasing The project��ould be developed in t��o phases. Phase 1��ould involve the demolition of all buildings on the site and construction of the approiimately 2,820,000-squa�e-foot Main Building, and an aclditiona1245,000 squa�e feet of auditorium,fitness center, and Valet Pa�lcing Reception uses. In acldition,the Main Parlcing Structure,North Tantau Pa�lcing Structure, Central Plant, Securit�-Receptions, Landscape Maintenance Buildings, and associated transportation and utilit�-infrastructure«ould also be developed as pa�t of Phase 1. As pa�t of Phase 1,the median of North Wolfe Road south of East Homestead Road��ould be tempora�il�- removed, alon��ith its trees,��hile utilitv infrastructure is bein�installed. Some or all of the trees from the median ma�-be stored off-site��hile the utilitv lines are installed. Follo��in� completion of the utilit�pro�ject,the median«ould be reconstructed accordin�to its cui7ent confi�uration and some or all of the trees��ould be transplanted bacic to the median in their ori�inal location or replaced��ith ec�uivalent trees (as some of the trees a�e not suitable for transplant). Also�4as pa�t of Phase 1, an approiimatel�- 15-foot tempora��-sound��a11��ould be installed a�ound the Phase 1 portion of the project site (eicept along the southem boundai�-of the project site, adjacent to I-280)to reduce construction-related noise levels in the vicinit�-of acljacent residential uses. Phase 1 sound«alls«ould be placed 30 feet from the side«allc (��here site boundaries face a public right-of-��a5-)or at the propert5-line. Sound��alls��ould be installed along the��est banlc of Calabazas Creelc. In addition, an 8-to 12-foot�"� fence/sound��a11 composed of concrete��ith structural steel�� *'� � ��-�T-��-��-°°��ould be located along the southern boundai�-of the project site, adjacent to I-280. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 144 � � � � � '� w �n , � � � � •� � � ': � y �o ,� I __ � � � a�i � � I - � � � � - -- - � � � - � - n _ � V� � � - � 0 C O _ � _ � � � _ � � ~ O _ � C U N O � � a - � � - a � � � C p � O X 0 3 w d - w _ a � � - U _ U � - � � C C - � � � - � - � a a `N `N W W C C N N � � U U � O O - O - O _ � � � � � O _ O O O Z Z _ Z _ Z a a a a U , m - m m m i�� o 0 0 0 -f � � � � � � � � � � _ � � � � - N N � � �aw - I ❑ a h � a � � �� I�I� � .� , , _ _v_ - � _ � - � _ � � � , � �� o � . . � N ♦ , �� S 3 � o � �. � ♦ � - w = a � � � � _ � � � � �i - � � � � � - � � � � F� o - ° o � : _- Y � � N � �� y � � � � � � . � -- � �y - a�i � m - �� m Fa p�, � 0 o d U '� �8 t��/If � - - _ > � � � �j �, ��F-R /� -_ - - - _ : _ _ � � � � 6 y ¢ __ €° �-i w LL a a a - � � N �_ � o � U � ��aV� �oa� wLLaaap � � � � o � o J z � � LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Phase 2��ould involve the development of 600,000 squa�e feet of off�ice,resea�ch, and development space east and��est of North Tantau Avenue, along��ith the Satellite Plant North and South,pa�lcing, and associated transportation and utilit�-infrastructure. As pa�t of Phase 2, temporai�-sound��alls��ould be placed 20 feet��est of the sha�ed propert5-line��ith the residential uses and Jenn�- Strand Parlc to the east of the project site.� No roads in the vicinit�-of the site��ould be closed for the duration of the project construction period. Ho��ever,tempora��-traf£ic diversion ma�-occur to facilitate relocation of utilities on North Wolfe Road and East Homestead Road, and street��idening on North Wolfe Road. In acldition, detours ma�-occur around Prunerid�e Avenue ea�lv in the construction period (before phvsical vacation of the street se�ment occurs)to allo�� for utilitv relocation. A tempora��-concrete batch plant��ould be located in the north��estern portion ofthe project site,��ith entries on the north and��est sides of the plant. The plant��ould be used to formulate concrete for use in the construction of the proposed project, and��ould reduce the need for the transport of miied concrete to the project site b�-trucic. Page 139 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: �� ,� � � �.tio T ,� Tr � •.._r� • �i . iiiicr� �rcn�LZincr-c3 �cc�rgii�c�ixcar o Other General Plan figures��ould be acljusted to reflect the removal of Pruneridge Avenue,the removal of the Pa�lcs and Open Space designation from the site, and the relocation of Glendenning Ba�n. o Amendments related to a change in the setbacic ratio for North Tantau Avenue from 1.5:1 to 1:1 due to a required mitigation measure to add a southbound right-tum lane on North Tantau Avenue to Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d. • ZoningMapAmendment. The PR zone,��hich coi7esponds to the approiimatel�- 1.1-acre portion of the site designated Pa�ks and Open Space in the General Plan,«ould be rezoned to P(MP). • DevelopmentAgNeement. If pa�-ties mutually-agree, a Development Agreement that��ould cover the entire project site��ould vest the project approvals. • Sz�bdivision Maps. Re-subdivision of the eiisting pa�celization b�-a vesting tentative subdivision map from 19 pa�cels to five pa�cels. The conformin� Final Map��ould; includei�the recordation of appropriate Covenants, Codes and Restrictions that«ould govem the use of the five parcels. • Conditional Use PeNmit. The Conditional Use Permit«ould allo« certain uses and facilities to be permitted on the site(including auditorium uses and«ireless antennae)if Apple meets certain conditions established b�-the Cit�-. i Sl.ansa and DPR,2012.App7e C'arixpzrs 2 C'o�rstrrrctzo�r Eqzriprixe�rtSratxrixary.December 11. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 14O LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS • Development PeNmit. The Development Permit��ould be granted concurrent��ith approval of a conceptual development plan that includes a general description of proposed uses and the circulation s�-stem, a topographical map of the site and neighboring properties, a landscape plan, and other information required by the City. Phase 2 development«ould require an independent Development Permit. Page 154 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Miti�ation Measure PLAN-3: The project sponsor shall implement the follo��ing measures to the satisfaction of the City,as illustrated in Figure IV-3: a. Fund and construct to the satisfaction of the Cit�-a pedestrian/bilce altemate creelc trail eitending from the intersection of North Tantau Avenue and Prunerid�e Avenuer�� , south to Vallco Pa�lc��ay, on both sides ofNorth Tantau Avenue, and then��est along the north side of Vallco Pa�lc��a�-to the intersection of Calabazas Creelc. This funding shall account for planning, design, collaboration��ith other agencies, and construction and maintenance of the alternate trail route. The trail shall include a combination of the follo��ing features that reference Calabazas Creelc: Figure IV-2 on page 161 of the Draft EIR is updated as sho��n on page 148 of this chapter. Figure IV-3 on page 162 of the Draft EIR is updated as sho��n on page 149 of this chapter. Page 163 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: The Parlc and Recreation��'�'�� -'r��°��-°�*�� (PR)zone coi7esponds to the portion ofthe site designated Pa�ks and Open Space in the General Plan. The PR zone allo��s for the development of pa�ks,playgrounds, and recreational facilities,including agricultural uses such as crop and tree fa�ming. According to Section 19.92 of the Zoning Ordinance, "The purpose of the pa�lc and recreation zone is to regulate the land uses and recreational activit5-permitted«ithin publicly-o��ned pa�lcs��ithin the City,to ensure the safet�-and enjo5-ment of the persons utilizing the pa�lc facilities, as��e11 as to protect the rights of acljoining propert5-o��ners." Footnote 24 on page 229 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: ��Frior to 200�,this portion of the site�vas zoned Planned IndusTiial(P(MF')).In November 200�,the area �vas approved for a to�vnhouse development consisting of 130 to�vnhomes and a 1.1-acre public parl..At that time, the�ea�vas rezoned as Planned Residential(P(Res))and Parl.and Recreatior��'�'�� '-�D��r(PR).Apple purchased the area in 2006 and in 2009 Apple applied for a rezoning of the P(Res)zoned parcels to allo�v for the development of planned indush-ial uses in addifion to residenfial uses.The Cit��g�-anted the rezoning to P(MF',Res). As part of the Apple Campus 2 Froject,Apple does not propose to remove the residenfial zoning desi�nafion on the site. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 14] _ R3/ �:•a PD �3�p RO L�c•�'a�j O/PD :�:C1/PD:::':;.: -•--- --_-_ : -- ._� - -=_ — —_-�� — — ..-. ,_ . -- �- - -- -- � �u,�`:-- -��i:�';�.. - . �. � - � , ;'�d"�'; ;��yt•!R � '` � F�,��+;�;``:; ;�•^;_.�,.;# •�� 1' . � ' � • ` ' 'a . . t:�:r..i.�. � . ` �� #. ' . � . � . S ; -.i -1 ' F-°'�f :. - " s+}�'.� .�.7': .`!n� ,R"' '_ '__ � F . . . # ��: ! ,: � - �''�:' ,1. �f ' • I L��p . ' • x : �Te• rr..�.� . ,� � . � , 1 �y'�•-• - r -— '� h i��r. �� .; ,� Ro j ; �_ � '� _{ ��-r-,�-r_� _ . .. � � � ;_; � . .. +�' . , - pQ � .- ; �._ �� .!� .t T �. � •.�, � Y-4i•.:.- .:'y��v"*• .r �: • � P w_. _ � _. ;, (Comm, Res) ��.��:, 4 � '- �3 ' •- ` ��"•� �� .*' �. ^'y:y�•,r F � �g �• • :i: . � _ -_ �"'K 1 � r •� ��.�•��...ri�, �� •{ �� "f�� :. --� '"• � � . � Pp/ - , �.� � - .�^ P(MP) ;�s . I - ��'� � � �� r p.�'.�� ryr�. "�.�; � i. � . � '�� :R e��{,� ' uf • r- � � _ :.r. �F� • N.�` l�" ;�� `ti. �. � � Ra��..�` P - �`�, . ' r. ` ' ..r,�.-, �- �S��i� . . -�s• ,: � r��Sy�: (Res) :�r,�'�, - �� _ .��; '`Z .p ° x C � r';•. �-r �. �� '�� - _a, �►, �P,±(Hotel).--� .� �'_- � ,�:+, . a. , � � , ,�''y '` , - � :� , `•��„_ .r �,,ry - ,pR '1� __ _C k ,�k� ��= ;_ � R1-6L ��. �,� ' .S ��µ��' .�.. `, . g¢..� y ' � '' � `�°-��,, � � �: �"� �� ' ��,°;F� �� '�� ;*i :�� '� P ��: � ; "�,�:�� .. , ; �- .�. � � • �'+'� 7 ��e.. , _ � t� .f+ (MP - �i M �' �'� ; � � . � Res) � E'�� . , � � � �I � � , ' � - , . .._.r.*.Y[ I � � . . �r ..- .. .. e •• : ,� ' � C�' •V' � .+,;,�! � ,,�. ,• � �� PD 1 � r' " y �— w�� . . - �� . t�'!� � . � !} �� I'' �� '* °: `�' �;� � II I � - . i = :.�� . � , _` R1 +� s�q ,� �: � 'r� . - � - � { � :� • 'i�. � � � _ �.L '�� '�•�, I p� I� t i `�- ' +r� .� �i i�� ` • •- . ��I �li•- • � ^�-.� � �i.. i,� �� • .�^''. �_� - ..� �� ' � r � +4�• 1'ri _ �' . � �:� �_�" �� ' ��P�(CG.) , a ia `' ��a �; �l.,.I ' �� lyf� "F�y . I � �r!� �...... • � y � o- � W,�� 1'1 � �f'� I � �I r � � �i ;� � (CG, ML, O, � _ ¢ ;I �'I - \�� Hotel, Regional '' �.= B .� � R Shopping, Rest) " . � P(MP) � =�. �' � t ,� _ +` � � � � e�r� 0 300 �I 600 = . - i'�T�• . n j. r FEET - � I'� 'Fi �•.e�.�•• (CG, O, ML) i � 'i�" L S � City of Cupertino � R3-Multiple Family Res. � R3-Medium Density Res. FIGURE Iv-2 � BQ-Quasi-Public Citv of Santa Clara - [Revised] � O-Admin/Professional Office CGGeneral Commercial R1-6L Single Family Res. ��: � � :::;:,� C1-Neighborhood Business MP-Planned Industrial pD-Planned Dev.Combining .�.� '��• P-Mixed Use Plan Development � g_public/Quasi Public r■� Project Site Boundaries - OS/PR-Open Space/ City of Sunnvale City Limits Boundary Park and Recreation R1-Single Family Res. RO-Low Density Res. f��j�jle Gam�us 2 pro�ect E'IR sou�cE: c,00c,LEEa�Tx.LSaassoc�zaTES,zNC� ,.rtTNE,oii Zoning Designations I'�,COC 1101 apple Campus 2 figures`,RTC'Figures�Fig_I�;2_[Re��ised]ai O 2�;13) c� � c� c� � rd � � � � w z � .� � � W a�i �o ,� �i �i �- P� a � v c I � �f � 0 v v v � v v E � � m v � �E � �o N v I w -�-� � a�i J � �, E �' � `^ � � c . Y � ai — Y — Y ro — cs '� �c o � v ro r� r� � � r� � � a V a V V H Q H � V H I � �y � ' � * .�, .o - � � � ' � i Lawrence Expressway br� .� r= �' � I � � � � I � 1�•..�.....,��.,� � � � � � � ��,. � _ I ��anracla.a � \ � � J [upertino , � I , ��r , L � � J �� Tantau - r; 0 v N c � _ �I�,,,,. Q � � 2 �✓' � � o z ,afi `—' O � � > .a � Wolfe w .a ' a d _ � � � ro W °' Q v 3 o � x � � � _ � � � � y � " x v y r. v a � � � o N > H � I BlaneY v z v1 � m � � �lo � N W �r G 'd+ � a u Nly O � �I � � I tiM I V] N 0 � �M v Z w � N o � � w � � J � N I U � O ro J DeAnza � � r W � � W � �. o w � � � � o w � � � ��,�� o J �L`"l ° � LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Page 358 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: • Vallco Parkway is a short(less than 0.5 mile) sii-lane, east-��est roacl��a�-that provides a connection bet��een Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue. Vallco Parlc��a�-has an approiimate ADT of 4,000 vehicles. Entitled development projects,including JC Penney,Rose Bo��1, and Main Street, a�e located along Vallco Pa�lc��a�-. The lane configuration of Vallco Parlc«a�-«i11 be modified in conjunction«ith these development projects*�� '��°� �� *'� ��° �� *�-°°* ��-'r��. The road currentl�-has one signalized intersection at Perimeter Roacl. Bet«een Perimeter Roacl and Wolfe Road, Vallco Pa�lc��a�-is cui7entiv under construction to provide t«o lanes in each direction as a result of a�provals associated ��ith the JC Penn�-and Rose Bo��1 projects. Bet��een Perimeter Road and Tantau Avenue, the Main Street Project has been approved to construct one lane plus an�led parlcin�in the eastbound direction,«hile the«estbound direction«ill remain three lanes. Additionallv, ��ith the Main Street�development project�,'~T� ��'�'�'��~�' ane��-traffic light��i11 be aclded�at Finch Avenue rn,r,,:� c.,-oo.i „�,, .�.o ,..�.o,-,,..�.o � �.,-„�,.o.,. .�.o n,r,,:� c.,-oo. ,, o �,o+,.-oo� �:�,.�. .,�,, T.,�+.,,, n�.o„„o� parallel on-street parlcing is currentiv under construction�along the frontage of the Rose Bo��1 Project��~��~''�-��~�'�� and the JC PenneS-pa�lcing ga�age bet��een Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road. Angled parlcing has�e been approved along the frontage of the Main Street project bet��een Perimeter Road and Tantau Avenue on the south side of Vallco Pa�lc��av. Ho��ever,no on-street parlcing eiists along the north side of Vallco Pa�lc��a�-bet��een Tantau Avenue and Perimeter Road. Page 359 of the Draft EIR is modified as follo��s: Near the project site, bic�-cle lanes (Class II)are provided on Pruneridge Avenue,Homestead Road,Wolfe Road, Tantau Avenue, Vallco Pa�lc��ay, and Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d. There is a discontinuit�-in the Class II facilit�-along Wolfe Road at the I-280 overcrossing. A Class III bilce route eiists on Tantau Avenue south of Stevens Creek Boulevard to Ba�nhart Avenue. There is a discontinuit�-in the Miller Avenue bilce lane bet��een Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d and Calle De Ba�celona. Additionally, bic�-cle facilities do not eiist on Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d east of Cronin Drive. Furthermore,the bilce lanes on Homesteacl Roacl a�e sha�ed��ith parlcing lanes at the follo��in�locations: 1)��estbound bet��een Ni�htin�ale Avenue and Ni�htha��lc Terrace and 2)��estbound from the intersection��ith Tantau Avenue for a�roiimatel�-350 feet. At these locations,parlcing is prohibited Monda�-throu h� Frida�-from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., durin��hich time the lanes a�e used for bilces and ri�ht-turn vehicles. The remainder of the time the lanes prima�il�-function as parlcin�lanes, althou�h bic�-clists can continue to use them��hen ca�s a�e not pa�lced in them. Figure V.I-3 on page 361 of the Draft EIR is updated as sho��n on the follo��ing page. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 15� � � , � �� Q Reed Ave Monroe�St � � Y m ^ � � � ( � �m --� a � a � Remington Dr i x w �v Q � � w v � � — � J H IC Fremont Ave EI Camino Real v� � v � r> � ¢ � T m I I� � � � � � �I � R � � Y� Benton St v cc ---- m � o �n � ¢ _ � R o � > � ( � R >/�� C � Ir � I � Homestead Rd a � � � F ' _ � m a 0 � C � _l — Pruneridge Ave lll � � / J � �� :� I i Stevens Creek Blvd �f � - — � — � � � � McClellan Rd ¢ MoorparkAve T ` R I m L �� Bollinger Rd � � � � � � m Williams Rd m � � � l ' ' � ¢ I ¢' Q ( — � v o 5 v � °1 r poyle Rd � `n � � ° - \ Rainbow Dr � Payne Ave ri � � � � �. � � �� v I a I � Prospect Rd �a'�� Hamilton Ave LEGEND � �'a � City of Cupertino ° � � Project Site � �, j Campbell Ave Existing Bicycle Facilities Coz Ave � � Class I Bike Path �ec�e�a � � Class II Bike Lane e � � C K Class III Bike Route � LL — C 3 McCoy Ave e Planned Bicycle Facitlities a � � ��• Class II Bike Lane � _ � � �°�ro=��E L S `\ FIGURE V.I-3 [Revised] � NoTTO saALE A��le Cam�us 2 Project EIR souxcE: FExx��EExs.auc.usTZOi�. Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities I'�,COC 1101 apple Campus 2 RTC`,Figures`,Fig_�;I3[Re�isecl]ai (8;1�'2013) LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Page 368 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Most commuting bic5-clists tra�el at a rate of about nine to 10 miles per hour,meaning the La«rence, Sunn�,-vale, and Santa Clara Caltrain stations a�e located about an 18, 23, and 28- minute bic�-cle ride a��a�-from Apple Campus 2, respectively-. Only the La��rence Caltrain station has continuous bic�-cle infrastructure that connects it to Apple Campus 2 in the form of Class II lanes along Wolfe Road (on all se�ments eicept bet��een old San Francisco Road and Fremont Avenue), Reed Avenue, and Aster Avenue. Page 394 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Impact TRANS-1: Under Existing plus Project Conditions, completion of the proposed project would cause intersection #21 Wolfe Road/I-280 Northbound Ramps to operate at an unacceptable level (change from LOS B to LOS E) during the AM peak hour based on City of Cupertino LOS standards. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-1: As part of the project,the project sponsor shall� construct an additional«estbound lane at intersection#21 Wolfe Road/I-280 Northbound Ramps to provide for dual left-turn and dual right-tum lanes. With the aclditional lane,the intersection«ould operate at acceptable LOS B (17.1 seconds) during the AM pealc hour. Ho��ever,the off-ramp intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Therefore,neither the project sponsor nor the Cit�-of Cupertino can ensure the implementation of the proposed mitigation measure; thus the impact is considered significant and unavoidable. (SU) Pages 396 through 398 of the Draft EIR,including the addition of Table V.I-10 (Eiisting Plus Project Free��a�-Levels of Service), are revised as follo��s. The changes to Table V.I-10 are not sho��n using underline and strilceout teit to enhance reaclabilitv. Table V.I-10: Existing Plus Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� Mixed-F'lo� Lanes � AM 4400 gg F 29 89 F 0.66% SR 17-Summit Road PM 24 C 11 24 C 0.2�% to Bear Creel.Road S� AM 4400 19 C � 19 C 0.11% PM 4� D 10 4� D 0.23% � AM 4400 �� F 39 93 F 0.89% SR 17-Bear Creek pM 20 C 1� 20 C 034% Road to Saratoga-Los AM 17 B 7 17 B 0.16% UatosRoad SB pM 4400 36 D 1� 36 D 034% SR 17-Saratoga-Los NF3 `�M 4400 �4 E 110 �6 E 2.�0% Uatos Road to Lark pM 28 D 30 28 D 0.68% AM 29 D 13 29 D 030% Avenue SB pM 4400 �0 F �0 71 F 0.91% � AM 4400 3� D 147 36 D 334% SR 17-Lark Avenue PM 23 C 40 23 C 0.91% to SR 8� AM 14 B 17 14 B 039% SB pM 4400 j0 E 100 �1 E 2.27% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 152 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� AM �3 E 20 �3 E 0.29% SR 17-SR 8�to San NF3 �,M 6900 19 C 8 19 C 0.12% Tomas E�press��a�/ o AM 13 B 3 13 B 0.04/o Camden Avenue SB pM 6900 21 C 20 21 C 0.29% SR 17-San Tomas � AM 6900 �� F 39 73 F O.i7% E�press�va��/Camden PM 20 C 16 20 C 0.23% Avenue to Hamilton AM 18 B 6 18 B 0.08% Avenue S� PM �g�� 27 D 39 27 D 0.�0% AM 71 F 77 6� F 0.98% SR 17-Hamilton � PM �� 36 D 31 32 D 0.40% Avenue to I-280 AM 26 C 12 26 C 0.17% SB pM 6900 41 D 77 42 D 1.12% AM 119 F 23 121 F O.iO% SR 8�-SR 87 to NE3 pM 4600 2� C 6 2� C 0.13% Almaden AM 22 C 3 22 C 0.07% E�press�va�� SB pM 4600 2� D 19 27 D 0.41% AM 8i F �i 86 F 0.98% SR 8�-Almaden NE3 pM 4600 36 D 12 36 D 0.26% E�press��a� to 0 Camden Avenue SB `�M 4600 �4 C � 24 C 0.11/o PM 41 D 37 41 D 0.80% SR 8�-Camden NE3 `�M 4600 �0 F 60 71 F 1.30% Avenue to Union pM 27 D 16 27 D 03�% AM 31 D 7 31 D 0.1�% Avenue SB pM 4600 �2 E �18 �3 E 1.0�1% SR 8�-Union NE3 `�M 4600 60 F 81 61 F 1.76% Avenue to S.Bascom pM 27 D 21 27 D 0.�16% Avenue SB `�M 4600 �0 C 10 20 C 0.22% PM 81 F 65 83 F 1.�1% � AM 4600 l0i F 108 109 F 2.3i% SR 8�-S.Bascom PM 14 B 28 1�1 B 0.61% Avenue to SR 17 AM 16 B 12 16 B 0.26% SB �,M 4600 68 F 86 70 F 1.87% � AM 4600 g� F 216 91 F �1.70% SR 8�-SR 17 to PM 18 B » 18 B 1.20% WinchesterBlvd AM 14 B 24 14 B 0.�2% SB pM 4600 27 D 171 28 D 3J2% AM 69 F 240 74 F 5.22% SR 8�-Winchester NE3 pM 4600 27 D 62 27 D 13�% Blvd to Saratoga AM 30 D 29 30 D 0.63% Avenue SB pM 4600 j4 E 190 �7 E 4.13% AM 32 D 48 32 D 1.04% SR 8�-Saratoga NF3 pM 4600 21 C 12 21 C 0.26% Avenue to Saratoga- AM 23 C � 23 C 0.11% Sunnvvale Road SB pM 4600 6i F 38 66 F 0.83% AM �4 E 0 47 E 0.00% SR 8�-Saratoga- I�TE3 �290 Sunnvvale Road to pM 21 C 0 18 B 0.00% Stevens Creek Blvd SB `�M 4600 19 C 0 19 C 0.00% PM 9� F 0 9� F 0.00% � AM 4600 109 F 28 110 F 0.61% SR 8�-Stevens PM 19 C 7 19 C 0.1�% Creelc Blvd to I-280 AM 1� B 3 12 B 0.04% SB pM 6900 g� F 22 68 F 0.32% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L ISJ LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� � AM 4600 �� F 31 11� F 0.67% SR 8�-I-280 to W. PM 1� B 223 20 C 4.8�% Homestead Road S� AM 4600 14 B 282 16 B 6.13% PM 2� C 72 26 C L�7% AM 89 F 26 90 F O.i7% SR 8�-W. NE3 4600 Homestead Road to pM 26 C 202 28 D 439% AM 2� C 240 27 D �.22% W.Fremont Avenue SB pM 4600 �3 E 61 �4 E 133% AM 6i F 20 6i F 0.�3% SR 8�-W.Fremont NE3 pM 4600 28 D 143 29 D 3.11% Avenue to El Camulo AM 2� C 186 26 C 4.04% Real SB pM 4600 72 F �i 73 F 0.98% � AM 4600 �� E 12 �2 E 0.26% SR 8�-El Camino PM 28 D 88 29 D 1.91% Real to SR 237 AM 2� C 111 32 D 2.41% SB pM 4600 106 F 27 13� F O.i9% AM 26 C 6 26 C 0.13% SR 8�-SR 237 to � pM 4600 20 C 44 20 C 0.96% C'entral E�press��a� S� AM �E�� 12 B �4 12 B 1.17% PM 90 F 1� 90 F 0.30% SR 8�-Cenh-al NE3 `�M 4600 36 D 6 36 D 0.13% E�press��a� to T JS YM 14 B 42 14 B 0.910% 101 SB `�M 4600 16 B �7 16 B 1.24/o PM 28 D 14 28 D 030% NE3 `�M 9200 9i F 88 96 F 0.96% I-280-US 101 to PM 21 C 31 21 C 034% McLaughlin Avenue AM 18 B 7 18 B 0.08% SB pM 9200 31 D �17 31 D 0.�1% I-280-McLaughlin � AM 9200 7i F 117 76 F 1.27% Avenue to lOth pM 34 D 39 34 D 0.�12% AM 22 C 14 22 C 0.1�% Sh-eet SB pM 9200 �2 E 94 �3 E 1.02% � AM 9200 76 F 130 78 F 1.41% I-280- l Oth Sh-eet to PM 29 D �13 29 D 0.�17% SR 87 �� AM ��2�� 20 C 16 20 C 0.17% PM 66 F 104 67 F 1.13% � AM 9200 88 F 260 92 F 2.83% I-280-SR 87 to Bud PM 72 F 8� 73 F 0.92% Avenue AM 19 C 32 19 C 03�% SB �,M 9200 67 F 207 69 F 2.2i% � AM 9200 88 F 289 92 F 3.1�% I-280-Bu-d Avenue PM 44 D 9�1 �1�1 D 1.02% to MeridianAvenue S� AM 9200 30 D 3� 30 D 038% PM 60 F 230 62 F 2.i0% � AM g�l� 113 F 327 112 F 3.84% I-280-Meridian PM 2� C 116 23 C 136% Avenue to I-880 S� AM 9200 2� C 40 19 C 0.�43% PM 8i F 260 67 F 2.83% � AM 6900 g� F 654 96 F 9.�8% I-280-I-880 to PM 34 D 212 3� D 3.07% Winchester Blvd AM 23 C 80 23 C 1.16% SB pM 6900 103 F 520 116 F 7.54% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 154 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� I-280-Winchester NE3 `�M 6900 �6 F 728 87 F 10.��% Blvd to Saratoga pM 34 D 247 3� D 3.�8% AM 36 D 94 37 D 136% Avenue SB pM 6900 j 1 E �78 �6 E 838% I-280-Saratoga NE3 `�M 6900 67 F 785 76 F 11.38% Avenue to La�vrence pM 29 D 22� 30 D 3.26% AM 28 D 100 29 D 1.�4�% E�press�va�� SB pM 6900 �� F 623 86 F 9.03% AM 62 F 382 66 F i.>4% I-280-La�vrence NE3 pM 6900 32 D 106 33 D 1.��1% E�press��a� to Wolfe c o Road SB `�M 6900 �� C 67 2� C 0.�7/0 PM 63 F 411 67 F 5.96% � AM 6900 �� E 13> >8 E 1.96% I-280-Wolfe Road to PM 31 D 70� 3� D 10.22% De Anza Blvd AM � 29 D 8�0 33 D 1232% SB pM 6)00 �� F 269 103 F 3.90% AM � �7 E 136 �8 E 1.97% I-280-De Anza Blvd � pM 6)00 29 D 672 32 D 9.7�1% to SR 8� S� AM 6900 �4 C 831 28 D 12.0�4% PM 81 F 245 85 F 3.ii% � AM 6900 62 F 107 63 F L55% I-280-SR 8�to PM 24 C 439 26 C 636% FoothillE�press�va�� S� AM 6900 �6 C �34 29 D 7J�1% PM 70 F 178 72 F 2.58% AM 41 D 86 �12 D 1.2�% I-280-Foothill NF3 pM 6900 23 C 368 2� C �33% E�press��a� to 0 AM 30 D 436 32 D 6.32/0 Magdalena Avenue SB pM 6900 j 1 E 146 �2 E 2.12% I-280-Magdalena � AM g�� 36 D 81 42 D 1.01% Avenue to El Monte pM 22 C 326 27 D 4.0�% AM 27 D 402 29 D �137% Road SB pM 9200 �0 F 134 71 F 1.46% AM 31 D 6� 31 D OJ1% I-280-El Monte NE3 pM 9200 21 C 261 22 C 2.8�1% Road to La Barranca AM 20 C 322 21 C 3.�0% Road SB pM 9200 63 F 87 6� F 0.9i% AM 29 D 6� 30 D 0.72% I-280-La Barranca NB pM �� 24 C 261 26 C 2.91% Road to Page Mill AM 20 C 322 21 C 3.�0% Road SB pM 9200 jg E 87 i9 F 0.9i% � AM 9200 23 C 39 23 C 0.42% I-280-Page Mill PM 4� D 1�7 46 D 1.71% Road to Alpine Road S� AM 9200 24 C 193 2� C 2.10% PM 23 C �2 23 C 0.�7% AM 8� F 3i 8i F O.il% I-880-I-280 to NF3 pM 6900 18 B 229 19 C 3.32% Stevens Creel. AM 20 C 308 22 C 4.46% Boulevard SB pM 6900 29 D 93 30 D 13�% AM 81 F 32 82 F 0.�6% I-880-Stevens Creek NF3 pM 6900 2� C 206 26 C 2.99% Boulevard to N. AM 61 F 277 64 F 4A1% BascomAvenue SB pM 6900 �2 E 8�1 �3 E 1.22% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 155 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� I-880-N.Bascom NE3 `�M 6900 �6 F 2� 76 F 0.3i% Avenue to The pM 29 D 1» 30 D 2.2�% AM 26 C 208 27 D 3.01% Alameda SB pM 6900 j6 E 63 �7 E 0.91% � AM 6900 g� F 18 8� F 0.26% I-880-The Alameda PM 29 D 116 30 D 1.68% to Coleman Avenue S� AM 6900 31 D 1�6 32 D 2.26% PM 7� F �7 7i F 0.68% � AM 6900 �4 E 14 �4 E 0.20% I-880-Coleman PM 33 D 87 33 D 1.26% Avenue to SR 87 S� AM 6900 31 D 117 32 D 1.70% PM 6� F 3i 6� F O.il% � AM 6900 » E 14 » E 0.20% I-880-SR 87 to N. PM 40 D 87 41 D 1.26% lst Sh-eet S� AM 6900 3� D 117 36 D 1.70% PM 73 F 3i 7� F O.il% � AM 6900 �� F 13 72 F 0.19% I-880-N. lst Sh-eet PM 44 D 78 4� D 1.13% to US 101 S� AM 6900 �� C 10� 26 C L�2% PM 8i F 32 86 F 0.�6% EB `�M 6900 » E 10 » E 0.14% I-880-US 101 to E. PM 60 F 62 61 F 0.90% Broka�v Road AM � 24 C 84 24 C 1.22% WE3 pM 6)00 67 F 26 67 F 0.38% I-880-E.Broka�v EB `�M 6900 30 D 6 30 D 0.09% Road to Montague pM 36 D 37 36 D 0.�4% E�p�vy WB `�M 6900 30 D �0 30 D 0.72°�/0 - PM 79 F 16 79 F 0.23/o I-880-Montague EB `�M 6900 �� D 3 27 D 0.04% E�p�vy to Ureat Mall pM 6i F 19 6i F 0.28�% AM 41 D 2� 41 D 036/0 Pl:�v�� WE3 PM 6900 �i F 8 7i F 0.12% EB `�M 4400 g� F 7 82 F 0.16% SR 237-SR 8�to PM 23 C �0 23 C 1.14% C'entral E�press��a� AM 24 C' 63 24 C' 1.43% WB pM 4400 j6 E 16 �6 E 036% SR 237-CenTial EB `�M 4400 31 D 4 31 D 0.09% E�press�va��to Maude pM 13 B 2� 13 B 0.�7�/0 Avenue WE3 `�M 4400 13 B 32 13 B 0.73/o PM 62 F 8 62 F 0.18% EB `�M 4400 60 F 2 60 F O.Oi% SR 237-Maude PM 2� C 13 2� C 030% Avenue to US 101 AM 31 D 24 31 D 0.»% WE3 pM 4400 60 F 6 60 F 0.1�% High-Occu anc��Vehicle O Lanes AM 61 F � 61 F 0.2�% SR 8�-SR 87 to � pM 16�0 12 B 1 12 B 0.06% Almaden E�press�va�� AM 1�� 4 A 0 4 A 0.00% PM 20 C 3 20 C 0.18% AM 4� D 8 4� D 0.48% SR 8�-Almaden NE3 pM 16�0 � A 2 9 A 0.12% E�press��a� to 0 AM 10 A 1 10 A 0.06/o Camden Avenue SB pM 16�0 24 C 6 24 C 036% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 15O LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� AM 42 D 11 42 D 0.67% SR 8�-Camden NF3 pM 16�0 10 A 3 10 A 0.18% Avenue to Union AM 8 A 1 8 A 0.06% Avenue SB pM 16�0 30 D 9 30 D 0.»% SR 8�-Union NE3 `�M 16�0 37 D 14 37 D 0.8�% Avenue to S.Bascom pM 11 A 4 11 A 0.24% Avenue SB `�M 16�0 � A 1 � A 0.06% PM 37 D 11 37 D 0.67% AM 77 F 19 78 F 1.15% SR 8�-S.Bascom � pM 16�0 18 B � 18 B 030% Avenue to SR 17 S� AM 16�0 14 B 2 14 B 0.12% PM 2� C 1� 2� C 0.91% AM 90 F 38 92 F 2.30% SR 8�-SR 17 to � pM 16�0 g A 10 8 A 0.61% Winchester Blvd AM 6 A 4 6 A 0.2�1% SB pM 16�0 24 C 30 24 C 1.82% AM 46 D 42 47 E 2.»% SR 8�-Winchester NE3 pM 16�0 g A 10 8 A 0.61% Blvd to Saratoga AM 4 A 2 4 A 0.12% Avenue SB pM 16�0 2� D 33 29 D 2.00% SR 8�-Saratoga NF3 `�M 16�0 31 D 8 31 D 0.48% Avenue to Saratoga- pM 7 A 2 7 A 0.12% AM 6 A 1 6 A 0.06% Sunnvvale Road SB pM 16�0 26 C 7 26 C 0.42% SR 8�-Saratoga- NF3 `�M 16�0 �1 C 0 21 C 0.00% Sunnvvale Road to pM 8 A 0 8 A 0.00% Stevens Creel.Blvd SB `�M 16�0 6 A 0 6 A 0.00% PM 31 D 0 31 D 0.00% � AM 16�0 �1 C 0 21 C 0.00% SR 8�-Stevens PM 8 A 0 8 A 0.00% Creel.Blvd to I-280 AM 9 A 0 9 A 0.00% SB pM 16�0 2� D 0 29 D 0.00% � AM 16�0 60 F 0 60 F 0.00% SR 8�-I-280 to W. PM 9 A 0 9 A 0.00% Homestead Road AM 7 A 0 7 A 0.00% SB pM 16�0 2� D 0 29 D 0.00% AM 41 D � 41 D 030% SR 8�-W. NE3 16�0 Homestead Road to pM � A 21 � A 1.27% AM 9 A 42 10 A 2.»% W.Fremont Avenue SB pM 16�0 21 C 11 21 C 0.67% AM 47 E 3 47 E 0.18% SR 8�-W.Fremont NE3 pM 16�0 � A 24 9 A 1.4�% Avenue to El Camulo AM 7 A 26 7 A L�8% Real SB pM 16�0 2� C 8 2� C 0.48% AM 39 D 2 39 D 0.12% SR 8�-El Camino � pM 16�0 � A 12 7 A 0.73% Real to SR 237 AM 9 A 16 9 A 0.97% SB pM 16�0 29 D � 29 D 030% � AM 16�0 �4 C 1 24 C 0.06% SR 8�-SR 237 to PM � A 6 � A 036% CenTialE�press�va�� AM 7 A 10 7 A 0.61% SB pM 16�0 18 B 2 18 B 0.12% P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 15] LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Table V.I-10: Existin�Plus Pro,ject Freeway Se�ment Levels of Service xisting Conditions Existing lus Pro'ect Conditions Peal� Capacitti� % Free�a��Segment Directioni Hour� v h 3 Densitti�a LOS' Tri s6 Densit�� LOS Im act� SR 8�-Cenh-al NF3 `�M 16�0 1� B 1 1� B 0.06% E�press�va��to US pM 7 A 8 7 A 0.48�/0 AM 4 A 7 4 A 0.42/o 101 SB pM 16�0 7 A 2 7 A 0.12% � AM 16�0 32 D �8 33 D 3.�2% I-280-Meridian PM 6 A 9 6 A 0.»% Avenue to I-880 AM 13 B 7 13 B 0.42% SB pM 16�0 82 F 46 84 F 2.79% AM �0 E 116 �3 E 7.03% I-280-I-880 to � pM 16�0 18 B 37 19 C 2.2�1% Winchester Blvd AM 12 B 14 12 B 0.8�% SB pM 16�0 92 F 92 97 F 5.58% AM 43 D 128 �16 D 7J6% I-280-Winchester NF3 pM 16�0 11 A 30 11 A 1.82% Blvd to Saratoga AM 10 A 10 10 A 0.61% Avenue SB pM 16�0 2� D 102 30 D 6.18% I-280-Saratoga NE3 `�M 16�0 �g E 139 62 F 8.42% Avenue to La�vrence pM 7 A 20 7 A 1.21% AM 9 A 11 9 A 0.67% E�press�va�� SB pM 16�0 32 D 110 34 D 6.67% I-280-La�vrence NE3 `�M 16�0 �6 E 0 �6 E 0.00% E�press�va��to Wolfe pM 10 A 0 10 A 0.00�/0 Road SB `�M 16�0 12 B 0 12 B 0.00% PM 39 D 0 39 D 0.00% � AM 16�0 �0 E 0 �0 E 0.00% I-280-Wolfe Road to PM 9 A 0 9 A 0.00% De Anza Blvd AM 18 B 0 18 B 0.00% SB pM 16�0 33 D 0 33 D 0.00% � AM 16�0 32 D 24 32 D 1.4�% I-280-De Anza Blvd PM 10 A 83 11 A �.03% to SR 8� AM 9 A 106 11 A 6.42% SB pM 16�0 2� C 43 26 C 2.61% � AM 16�0 42 D 19 42 D 1.1�% I-280-SR 8�to PM 11 A 71 12 B 430% Foothill E�press�va�� AM 1� B 94 16 B �.70% SB pM 16�0 18 B 31 18 B 1.88% I-280-Foothill NF3 `�M 16�0 40 D 1� 40 D 0.91% E�press��a��to pM 7 A 40 8 A 2.42�/0 Magdalena Avenue SB `�M 16�0 13 B 66 14 B 4.00% PM 13 B 21 13 B 1.27% Notes: Bold font indicates unacceptable operations based on VTA's LOS E Standard.Bold and highlighted indicates significant inlpacts. ' NE3=Northbound.SB=Southbound. ' AM=morning pealc hour,PM=afternoon pealc hour. 3 vph=vehicles per hour � Measured in passenger c�us per mile per l�ule. � LOS=level of seiti ice. ` Project tr�ips added to uidividual fi-ee��a� seginents � Percent ConTiibution dete��uiined bv dividing the number of project hips b�the fiee��av segmenY s capacit�. Source:2011 Monitoring and Conformance Report,VTA,Mav 2012. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 15 g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Imnact TRANS-22: Completion of the proposed project would add substantial amounts of traffic to the following te�r mixed flow segments and e�HOV freeway segments operating at LOS F: • I-280, Southbound,El Monte Road to Ma�dalena Avenue • I-280,Northbound, SR 85 to Foothill Expressway • I-280, Southbound,Foothill Expressway to SR 85 • I-280, Southbound, SR 85 to De Anza Boulevard • I-280, Southbound,De Anza Boulevard to Wolfe Road • I-280,Northbound,Lawrence Expressway to Wolfe Road • I-280, Southbound,Wolfe Road to Lawrence Expressway/Stevens Creek Boulevard • I-280,Northbound, Saratoga Avenue to Lawrence Expressway/Stevens Creek Boulevard • I-280, Southbound,Lawrence Expressway/Stevens Creek Boulevard to Saratoga Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Winchester Boulevard to Saratoga Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Winchester Boulevard to I-880 • I-280, Southbound,Winchester Boulevard to I-880 • I-280,Northbound,I-880 to Meridian Avenue • I-280, Southbound,I-880 to Meridian Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Meridian Avenue to Bird Avenue • I-280, Southbound,Meridian Avenue to Bird Avenue • I-280,Northbound,Bird Avenue to SR 87 • I-280, Southbound,Bird Avenue to SR 87 • I-280,Northbound, SR 87 to lOt" Street • I-280, Southbound, SR 87 to lOt" Street • I-280,Northbound, lOt"Street to McLau6hlin Avenue • I-280,HOV,Northbound, Saratoga Avenue to Lawrence Expressway • I-280,HOV, Southbound,Winchester Boulevard to I-880 • I-280,HOV, Southbound,I-880 to Meridian Avenue • SR 85,Northbound,Winchester Boulevard to SR 17+HOV+� r'°~~a�~ "-,�~„� • SR 85,Northbound, Saratoga Avenue to Winchester Boulevard • SR 85, Southbound, SR 17 to Bascom Avenue • SR 85,Northbound, SR 17 to Bascom Avenue+HOV • SR 85, Southbound,Bascom Avenue to Union Avenue P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 15g LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS • SR 85,Northbound,Bascom Avenue to Union Avenue • SR 85,Northbound,Union Avenue to Camden Avenue • I-880, Southbound,Bascom Avenue to Stevens Creek Boulevard These freeway segments would be impacted under the Existing Plus Project Conditions based on CMP guidelines. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-22: The project sponsor shall pa5-a$_�Fr,9991,292,215 fair sha�e contribution to��ards�e planned transportation projects ��'°�+��°�' �� '�'^'� ��,��„ ,,,��;,,,,, n��,,, �n��z_that��ould improve traf£ic operations of the impacted free��a�-segments and provide aclded transportation capacity on pa�allel facilities: (1) SR 85 Eipress Lane project(converting the eiisting HOV lane to a toll lane to allo�� single occupant vehicles to drive in the HOV lane for a fee) bet��een Mountain Vie« and San Jose; (2) eliminatin�the eiistin� bottleneck on southbound I-280 bet«een El Monte Roacl and Ma�dalena Avenue; and (�3) either the Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) stations proposed��ithin Cupertino �� c.,.� „ r,.,.,.�_�,.,,�,.�.,.,.,, ,..�x�,.�� ,.,.,, ,.�,, r,,. n�� '��„'°T-�,��' or an altemative improvement or stud�-to��a�ds the improvement of the impacted I-280 corridor or a parallel coi7idor that��ould provide capacit�-. The fair sha�e contribution amount��as calculated in consultation��ith VTA staff based on the project's contribution to project gro��th on the impacted free��a�-segment. It is unlilcel�-that the Eipress Lane or BRT project��ould be implemented prior to project completion and that these improvements��ould reduce the impact to a less-than- significant level. In addition,the Cit�-has no control over the implementation of these mitigation measures; therefore the impact to the free��a�-segments��ould remain significant and una�oidable. (SU) Page 405 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Impact TRANS-9: Under Background plus Project Conditions, completion of the proposed project would exacerbate unacceptable operations of intersection #36 Stevens Creek Boulevard/Calvert Drive/I-280 Ramps (west) during the PM peak hour based on CMP guidelines. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-9a: At intersection#36 Stevens Creek Bouleva�d/Calvert Drive/I-280 Ramps (��est),the project sponsor shall implement Mitigation Measure TRANS-3 (add eiclusive eastbound right-turn lane),��hich��ould improve intersection operations to 1122 seconds (LOS F). Ho��ever,the Stevens Creek Bouleva�d/Calvert Drive/I-280 Ramps (��est)intersection��ould continue to operate unacceptably. " -, . " .,-„��r,.,..,,.:,.� � -�.�.�. ,. .-.ti� � .-. �: . P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe iena>FL�'�L 1O� LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Providing a s�e�4 channelized free right-tum lane��ith a thud eastbound receivin�lane on the connector linlc bet��een Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d and La��rence Eipress��a�-,for a distance of a�roiimatel�- 1,250 feet,including a pedestrian-activated traffic si n� al to allo« for protected pedestrian crossin�s to the pedestrian refu�e island,«ould improve intersection operations to LOS�D+��ith�9 38.6 seconds of dela�-. u�,�°T-°,- *'�°,-° �,-° _ � ��. ,.�,-:,.�.. ,.�,.-,,.-„ �,,�,, .,. „ ,.,,,,.� „ �,, , ,.�.. .,,,-� �„�� This improvement��ould reduce the impact to a less-than-si�nif�icant level. Ho��ever,this intersection is a CMP intersection and is located��ithin the Cit�-of Santa Cla�a. It is also under Caltrans jurisdiction. The project sponsor«ould be rec�uired to coordinate«ith the Cit�-of Santa Cla�a and Caltrans to construct the identified ph�-sical improvement at the Stevens Creelc Boulevard/Calvert Drive/I-280 Ramp (��est)intersection. Since this intersection is outside of the Cit�-of Cupertino's jurisdiction,the Citv cannot�ua�antee that the improvement��ould be constructed. For this reason the impact��ould remain si�nificant and una�oidable. Miti�ation Measure TRANS-9b: The project sponsor shall eipand the TDM program to reduce the severit�-of the impact. Increasing the TDM pa�ticipation and associated altemative mode share from 28 percent to 34 percent��ould improve operations to LOS F (142.8 seconds)��ithout implementation of TRANS-3;ho��ever it��ould not reduce the impact to a less-than-signif�icant level. A robust monitoring program��ould be required to ensure that this TDM program mitigation measure is implemented and that the required trip reduction is achieved. Details of the TDM program are discussed under the Evaluation of TDM Program Eipansion section. (SU) Pages 411 and 412 of the Draft EIR a�e revised as follo��s: Impact TRANS-13: Under Cumulative plus Project Conditions, completion of the proposed project would cause intersection #8 De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard to operate at an unacceptable level (change from LOS E+to LOS E) during the PM peak hour based on City of Cupertino LOS impact thresholds. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-13a: At intersection#8 De Anza Bouleva�d/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d,the provision of an eiclusive southbound right-turn lane (for a total of t��o left- tum lanes,four through lanes, and one right-tum lane) and adjusting the signal timings to accommodate the aclded tum lane«ould improve intersection operations to acceptable levels at LOS E+��ith 58.9 seconds of a�erage delay.Ho��ever,this improvement is phy-sically-not feasible, since the��idening of the road��a�-to accommodate the south- bound right-turn lane��ould impact an underground garage belonging to the office development on the north��est corner of the De Anza Bouleva�d/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d intersection;therefore the impact at the De Anza Bouleva�d/Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d intersection is considered significant and una�oidable. Miti�ation Measure TRANS-13b: The project sponsor shall eipand the TDM program to reduce the severit�-of the impact. Increasing the TDM pa�ticipation and associated P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 1O1 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS altemative mode share from 28 percent to 34 percent��ould improve operations to LOS E (62.1 seconds);ho��ever the increase in TDM participation��ould not reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. Miti�ation Measure TRANS-13c: The project sponsor shall provide a$50,000 fair-sha�e contribution to��a�ds the implementation of an adaptive traffic si�nal s�-stem alon�De Anza Bouleva�d bet«een Homestead Road and Rainbo« Drive. Implementation of an adaptive traf£ic si�nal svstem��ould improve intersection operations;ho��ever it��ould not reduce the impact to a less-than-si�nificant leveL (SU) Page 413 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Impact TRANS-19: Under Cumulative plus Project Conditions, completion of the proposed project would exacerbate unacceptable operations of intersection #36 Stevens Creek Boulevard/Calvert Drive/I-280 Ramps (west) during the PM peak hour based on CMP guidelines. (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-19a: - -, ,,:�,.,,��,, , �,,�,-n�r:.:,.,,.:,.� n�r�„�,,,-�Tv n,.TC � r,,,,,, .,.-,. � ,.�„�:� � �„�.�,,.,,�,, , ,.�.. .,,,-� ��'°�-°�' � ��* ��' � ��'�'�'°. The project sponsor shall,implement Miti a� tion Measure TRANS-9a(acld free eastbound ri�ht-tum lane),��hich��ould unprove intersection operations to LOS D (41.5 seconds). This improvement��ould reduce the impact to a less-than-si�nificant level. Ho��ever, because this intersection is under Citv of Santa Cla�a and Caltrans�jurisdiction,the Cit�-cannot�ua�antee that the improvement «ould be constructed. For this reason,the impact«ould remain si�nificant and una�oidable. Miti�ation Measure TRANS-19b: The project sponsor shall eipand the TDM program to reduce the severit�-of the impact. Increasing the TDM pa�ticipation and associated altemative mode share from 28 percent to 34 percent��ould improve operations to LOS F (145.8 seconds)��ithout implementation of mitigation measure TRANS-9; ho��ever the increase in TDM pa�-ticipation��ould not reduce the impact to a less-than-significant leveL (SU) Page 418 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Impact TRANS-23: Based on City of Cupertino standards,the design of the project with three left-turn lanes on the Wolfe Road driveway approach would cause a substantial increase in conflicts due to vehicles weaving on Wolfe Road between the driveway and the I-280 ramps in order to merge and align into the correct lanes to enter the freeway upon exiting the campus. (S) Implementation of one of the follo��in�t��o miti�ation measures��ould reduce this impact to a less-than-si�nificant level: P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 1O2 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Miti�ation Measure TRANS-23: At the main project drive��a�-on Wolfe Roacl,the project sponsor shall reduce the number of left turn lanes from three to t��o. This��ould reduce the«ea�ing on southbound Wolfe Road bet«een the drive«a�-and the I-280 northbound on-ramp since there«ould be, at most, a one-lane lane change in order for drivers to align themselves to the coi7ect lane. (LTS) OR Miti�ation Measure TRANS-23 (Alternate): The project sponsor shall be permitted to construct three left-tum eiit lanes from the project site to Wolfe Roacl if all of the follo��in�measures a�e implemented: • Clea�signa�e,includin� but not limited to overheacl si�ns, shall be installed to indicate the destination of each of the three eiit lanes in order to discour ea� lane changes. • Each lane on Wolfe Roacl, bet��een the drive��a�-and Prunerid�e Avenue, shall be clearlv ma�lced b�-painted stripes, directional a�ro«s, and destination le en� ds to indicate the destination of each lane and to indicate b�-double lines or other appropriate inarlcin�s that changin�lanes is a violation of la��. • The project sponsor shall fund the follo��in�measures for a trial period of nine months from issuance of the fust certificate of occupancv for the Main Buildin�and shall install closed-circuit video cameras linlced to the Cit�-'s Traffic Operations Center to continuouslv record vehicle movements at the project drive«a�-and alon� southbound Wolfe Road. Trained personnel,��ho are independent from the project sponsor, shall periodicall�-revie�� the video foota�e at the direction of the Citv, and provide a report at the end of each month to the Public Works Depa�tment. This report shall document anv unsafe or ille�al lane chan�es (violations) obseived,notin� accidents caused bv violations and notin��hether,in the professional jud�ment of the independent obseiver,the observed violations constitute a safet�problem that should be acldressed and,if so,recommendin�measures to acldress them. • If, at anv time follo��in�the nine-month trial period implementation of the measures listed above do not substantiall�prevent violations,in the professional opinion of the independent observer and the Cit�-,the Cit�-shall determine��hether additional measures a�e rec�uired, or«hether the number of lanes must be reduced to t«o eiit lanes. Monitorin� shall continue until nine months follo��in� full occupanc�-of the ip�o�ect. • A penaltv of$500 per violation durin�the PM 2-hour pealc period per da�-shall be paid b�-the project sponsor to the Cit�-. The number of violations shall be determined b�-the independent observer based upon revie« of the video foota�e and eitrapolated to account for dailv activitv durin�the PM 2-hour pealc period should dailv video foo e not be revie«ed. • The project sponsor shall develop emplo�-ee education materials,to the satisfaction of the Cit�-, eiplainin�the proper use of the drive��a�-eiit lanes��ithout��ea�in�among lanes. (LTS) P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 16J LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS Page 420 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Condition of A�roval CA-TRANS-1: Apple shall eitend the northbound right-tum pocicet at #28 Tantau Avenue/Pruneridge Avenue to the#29 Tantau Avenue/Project Access intersection (approiimatel�-600 feet)to provide for improved operations along the Tantau Avenue coi7idor. Tlallco PaNkwav Evalz�ation. With proposed development projects (JC Penne�-, Rose Bo��1, and Main Street), Vallco Parlc��a�-��ould be reconfi�ured to ha�e t��o lanes in each duection bet«een Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road (cui7entiv under construction), and one eastbound lane and three«estbound lanes bet��een Perimeter Road and Tantau Avenue. Durin�the AM and PM pealc hours,the model sho��s that��ith one eastbound throu�h lane there��ould be eicessive c�ueuin�in the eastbound direction durin�the pealc hours. As a condition of approval it is recommended that Vallco Pa�lc«a�-bet«een Perimeter Roacl and Tantau Avenue be reconfi�ured to have t��o lanes in each direction (ultimatel�-providin�for t��o throu�h lanes in each direction along the entire length of Vallco Parlc��a�-). With the added traf£ic volumes from the proposed pro�ject and the provision of a second eastbound throu�h lane,it is recommended that a ne« si na� 1 be provided at the Main Street parlcin�g�a�e drive«a�-bet«een Finch Road and Tantau Avenue to provide for controlled access at the pa�lcin��ara�e. Testin� of the model ��ith the t��o-lane configuration in both directions of travel sho��ed that the��estbound duection ��ould operate��ithout eicessive c�ueuin�, even thou�h the tra�el lanes��ould be reduced from three to t��o lanes. Condition of A�roval CA-TRANS 2: A�le shall reconfi�ure Vallco Pa�lc��a�-bet��een Perimeter Road and Tantau Avenue to t«o vehicle lanes and one bilce lane in each direction, plus diagonal parlcin�on the south side,includin�an�-associated improvements such as, but not limited to,median relocation. In addition, Apple shall desi�n and install a traf£ic si�nal at the Main Street Project�a�a�e entrance onto Vallco Parlc��a�-. (Please note that subsequent references to Conditions of Approval in Section V.I, Transportation and Circulation,«ould be renumbered accordingly-.) Evalz�ation ofFNeeway Ramps. The VISSIM simulation anal�-sis��as also conducted to evaluate impacts of the project on the operations of I-280/Wolfe Road on and off-ramps. The addition of projecttraffic��ould cause eicessive queuing on the Wolfe Roacl/I-280 off-ramps that��ould eitend onto the free��a�-mainline. Page 421 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s. This minor change is made to allo�� the Cit�-Council to aclopt the measure that��ould ha�e the least impact on the operation of Cupertino Village. Evaluation of Adjacent Driveway Conditions. The Cupertino Village has a drive��a�- on Wolfe Road that is directl�-north of/adjacent to the ne�� project drive��a�-intersection. Vehicles eiiting the drive��a�-might ti�-to maneuver across the tluee southbound through lanes to access the left-turn lanes to tum into the project site or malce a U-turn,resulting in haza�dous conditions for vehicles. Additionally, during the pealc commute periods,the southbound traffic volumes are high and ma�-create queues that effectivel�-blocic drive��a�-access,��hich could potentia11�-1eacl to impatient drivers merging into traffic��hen there a�e insufficient gaps. This P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe iena>FL�'�L 1O4 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS drive«a�-should be restricted to right turns in on1�-or closed due to its proiimit5-to the ne« signalized intersection. Impact TRANS-27: The proposed location of the project driveway intersection on Wolfe Road and the associated congestion would result in hazards for vehicles exiting the southernmost Wolfe Road driveway to the Cupertino Village shopping center (City of Cupertino and CEQA). (S) Implementation of one of the follo��in�t��o miti�ation measures��ould reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level: Miti�ation Measure TRANS-27: The southernmost drive��a�-to the Cupertino Village shall�be closed^��°�+��+°�' +� ��'�+ +�� '�-. With this mitigation the impact ��ould be less-than-significant. (LTS) OR Miti�ation Measure TRANS-27 (Alternate): The southernmost drive��a�-to the Cupertino Villa�e shall be restricted to ri�ht-turns in on1�-. With this mitigation the impact��ould be less-than-significant. (LTS) Page 427 of the Draft EIR is revised as follo��s: Imnact TRANS-30: The added traffic on Wolfe Road and around the project site would result in increased congestion and could induce transit demand and increase transit ridership in the area,which currently has minimal transit stop amenities (VTA). (S) Miti�ation Measure TRANS-30: The project sponsor shall upgrade transit stops along Wolfe Road bet«een Stevens Creelc Bouleva�d and Homestead Road, on Vallco Pa�lc«a�- bet«een Wolfe Roacl and Tantau Avenue, and on Tantau Avenue bet��een Stevens Creelc Boulevard and Homestead Road, ��' �� u�...��'��,, ��,, �.�'�T-�� T��'�„ n�°„�,,,, ��,, ,��,.��,.�,,, (LTS) T411Ti-n'OLCCf. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 1O5 LSA ASSQCIATES, INC. RESPONSE TO CQMMENTS DOCUMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR IV. TEXT REVISIONS This page intentionally left blank. P�ociioi av�i ��„v��;�x�»rrcTS�aT�,s��e„�+Te rx �� ,,.ao�(oe ieiia>FL�'�L 1OO APPENDIX A COMMENT LETTERS Lett A1 From:Christina Uripe[mailtfl_turibe�a�sunnyVal�.ca.�i� Sent: Monday,July 2Z, aQ13 11:ifi AM ro: Piu Ghosh; Aarti Shrivastava Cc: Hansan H�m; ]o�n Borger; Trudi Ryan;]ack Witthaus;Andrew Nliner; Kent StefFens Suhjett:City af Sunnyvale Camments an the DraR EIR�or the Apple Z Campus ❑��r Aarti S�iri�aititava a��J Piu Ghutih, Pleatie 1'ii�d at[ached Ci[y af 5uniiyv�le'�cn�nme�tlti rn� [he �ralt Cn�irnnme�}t��l Ii��p,iGt Rc�nrt i't�r lhe A��e 2 C��m��u�. I 1 Plea�e reply coni'ii��ing rereipt of 5limiy��alz'��ammt.��tti. Tt�ank you, Chritil':n�t Urihe Departznr�it t,t'Puhlir W't�r�� Lett A1 ,��FORti�L cont. �Q- '�'�-� U� �m Transmitted by electronic mail July 22, 2013 and sent regular U.S. mail. Aarti Shrivastava, Director of Community Development City of Cupertino Community Development Department 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Camments to the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Apple 2 Campus Dear Aarti: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Apple campus along Homestead Road in Cupertino. This letter includes all City of Sunnyvale comments to the DEIR We appreciate the cooperative approach you and the City team have taken with the project, and look forward to continuing to work with you going forward. The 2 new campus provides many exciting opportunities for the area, and the City of Sunnyvale generally supports the success of local companies. But the City of Sunnyvale alsa has an abligatian to its community members to ensure any new project is mitigated to a degree that the positive way of fife expected is not d isru pted. Here are our comments: A. Proiect Description: � 1. Page 66, Praposed Building Summary- Tab1e III-2 shows Phase 2 building heights to be 60 feet in height, but the table imbedded in Figure III-4 3 shows building heights af 35 feet. Please clarify. 2. Page 75, Corporate Fitness Center- Please include in the description of this facility that the parking provided adjacent to that building will be for fitness center employees and service vehicles only, and not for use by 4 employees of the main building. Also, on Page 99, please add that parking at the Fitness Center wauld be far fitness center employees and service vehicles onty. 3. Page 96, Landscaping- The EIR stated a seven foot perimeter fence will be added approximately 30-50 feet from the public sidewalk, with 5 ADDRESS ALL M,41L TO: P.O.BOX 3707 SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94088-3707 TDD (40$)730-7501 :aPrinted on Recycled Paper Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 2 landscaping between the sidewalk and fence. This 30-50 foot landscaped 5 area could provide safe refuge for peaple intent on mischief. Will security cont. cameras be added along the fence to ensure that area is safe? 4. Page 102, East Homestead Circulation- The DEIR states that a shuttle bus pull-out for the Fitness Center is proposed along Hamestead Road. 6 What types of buses are these expected to be, and how often will they run down Homestead Road? 5. Page 125, Parking- Please clarify that the parking for the Fitness Center is far fitness center employees and service vehicles only. � B. Aesthetics: 1. Page 195, Photosimulations- The DEIR includes several photosimulations from different locations around the property. Vantage point 6 shows the g view from Peacock Avenue. Another simulation is warranted from the homes at the point the building comes closest to Homestead Road. 2. Page 212, Light and Glare- Please clarify that light and glare calculations were done without assuming landscaping will be in a mature state and of significant grawth. Upon initial occupancy of the main building, only the large existing trees along the sidewalk on Homestead Road will be in place, and all landscaping behind that will be new growth. 1� candition of 9 approval for the praject could be added to require newly-planted trees along the Homestead Road section af the main building at the point it is closest to the road be large 36-inch box trees to ensure lighting and glare is controlled. C. Traffic and Transportation: Recommended Improvements 1. The project is clearly going to have significant effects on the locaf transportation system. The EIR concludes that rnany impacts are unavaidable or rnarginally acceptable, and others are not analyzed in sufficient detail to identify issues. While the document appears substantially campliant with VTA and lo�al standards in terms of the scope of the traffic analysis, the praject and the City of Cupertino need to make a considerable investment in local transportation infrastructure to offset the 10 impacts of this project fihat are not captured by generalized impact analysis methodologies such as overall intersection LQS. Particular areas for consideration of investment are Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road, De Anza Boulevard, and Homestead Road. Based an recent traffic counts and abservations, the existing condit�on features long queues for southbound PM traffic that are not captured by th� TRAFFiX analysis. Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 3 Sunnyvale recommends cansideration of the fallowing operational improvements to address intersection queuing issues that will be exacerbated by project traffic: a. Provide adaptive traffic signal control or another operational improvement in the Homestead Road corridor to address existing and project condition queuing and delays in peak north-south directions and Homestead Road side street delays due to poor 10 platooning of vehicles. cont. b. Fund a study of optimizing traffic signal operations at the De Anza Baulevard/Homestead Road/Route 280 complex and provide hardware and software upgrades including adaptive traffic signal control or other advanced, applicable traffic signal control, so as to reduce metering/congestion inducing effects of signal operations at this lacation. The project intends to rely neavily on alternative transportation use and transportation demand management, but there are bike facility deficiencies in the immediate vicinity of the project. There is a discontinuity in the Class II facility along Wolfe Road at the 1-280 overcrossing and at Wolfe and Homestead immediately adjacent to the project site. The bike lane gap at Wolfe and Homestead should be addressed, given its proximity to the project and the assumption that TDM measures will be required including bicycle support facilities and 11 encouragement of bicycling. Sunnyvale recommends fixing the alignment of southbound Nomestead Road and eliminating the bike lane gap by: Either eliminate the short # 3 lane southbound which allows bike lane striping southbound and provides enough of a shift to address the intersection offset and provide a northbound bike lane; or by widening on the west side to keep the existing lane configuration, fix the alignment, and provide space far bikes. There are also areas of conflict between autamobiles and bicyclists on Wolfe Road between Homestead Road and Fremont Avenue. The bicycle lanes in both directions taper away from the curb in certain sections to allow for pockets of on-street parking. Motor vehicles traveling on 12 Homestead frequently will cut across the bike lanes at these tapers. These areas are prime areas far the installation of ,�olored bike lanes. Sunnyvale recommends installation of colored asphalt at these taper areas as a means to further support bicycling by Apple employees. Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 4 echnical Comments 2. Page 347, Scope of Study- The traffic study should be done to also I 13 conform to CEQA requirements. 3. Page 349, Figure V.I-1- The intersections of HomesteadiBlue Jay, Homestead/Heron, Sunnyvale-Saratoga/Cheyenne-Connemara, Sunnyvale-SaratogatAlberta-Harwick, and �awrence/Benton appear to meet the 10 trips per approach lane criteria as upstream intersections 14 were included in the analysis. These intersections should be analyzed as well, ar at least the locations in Sunnyvale as this is S�mnyvale's standard analysis procedure. The traffic analysis assumes that there is no Sunnyvale trip distributian north of Fremont Avenue. Should some assumption have been made to more broadly distribute trips in the immediate project vicinity rather than 15 relying solely on zip code data? Isn't it likely that employees of the new project location will live in Sunnyvale closer to the site? 4. Page 351, Footnote- VTA has given guidance that assumptions on the nurnber of employees should be related to the conditions present at the 16 time of the most recent CMP monitaring. Please confirm with VTA that the scenario used in the study is consistent with TIA preparation guidance. 5. Page 358, Existing Roadway Network (continued from page 354), De Anza Boutevard- Please note that the extension of De Anza Boulevard in Sunnyvale, Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road, has only six lanes, including the 17 intersection of Sunnyvale-Saratoga/De Rnza and Homestead Road. Was this included in the study, and would it affect LOS calculations? 6. Page 358, Pedestrian Facilities- The lack of pedestrian crossings and the difficulty of crossing freeway on-ramps may constitute an environmental impact given that the project is likely to add additional pedestrian traffic. 18 Sunnyvale recorr�mends that improvements that make ramp crossings friendlier for pedestrians be includecl in the praject or considered as environmental mitigation. 7. Page 36Q, eighth paragraph- Please mention that there are part-time bike I 19 lanes on Homestead and identify those locations. 8. Page 361, Figure V.I-3- Old San Francisco Road, from Fair Oaks Avenue to Sunnyvale Avenue is a Class II bikeway. Manet Drive and Michelangelo Drive are Class II bikeways. EI Camino Real, from Fair 20 Oaks to Sunnyvale Avenue is a funded, planned Class II bikeway. There are existing bike lanes on Sunnyvale Avenue from Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road to Evelyn Avenue, and on Cezanne, from EI Camino Real to Old Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 5 San Francisco Road. Wolfe Road, south of Fremont is not officiaily 20 designated as a Class III bike route. Hollenbeck Avenue from EI Camino cont. Real to Danforth is a Ciass II bikeway. 9. Page 362, Figure V.I-4- Intersection locations should be labeled for ease I 21 of reference. 10.Page 363, Figure V.I-5- The bus stop map is generally incomplete. EI Camino Real and Wolfe Road stops are major transfer points, but are not 22 shown. 11.Page 368, Apple Shuttle Service and Bicycle Access to Rail Statians (continued from page 367)- The second paragraph states that Class II lanes along Wolfe Road connect the Lawrence Caltrain Station to Apple 23 Campus 2. However, the Wolfe bikeway is incomplete between Old San Francisco Road and Fremont Avenue. Please note. 12.Page 376, Cumulative No Project Conditions — It is more appropriate to use a longer term, model based analysis due to the scale of the project, and to be able to better understand the praject's relatinnship to long range 24 land use plans and carresponding tra�c grawth. 13.Page 376, Cumulative No Project Approved Projects and Traffic Volumes- In the final paragraph, a nine year cumulative scenaria is inappropriate as it daes not correspand to area land use plans. Sunnyvale recommends a 25 cumulative analysis that aligns with General Plan build-out assumptions of area General Plans. 14.Page 377, Criteria of Significance, the last bullet point on page 377- Stating that the project does nat conflict with agency plans is inaccurate. The project conflicts with Sunnyvale's Bike Capital Improvement Program, 26 specifically regarding the bike lanes at Wolfe/Homestead. 15.Page 379, Pedestrian Impact Criteria- The evaluation should take into account adjacent cities policies and plans, such as the City of Sunnyvale's 27 Pedestrian Safety and Opportunities Study and the Comprehensive Schaol Traffic Study. 16.Page 380, Bicycle Impact Criteria- The analysis should take inta account nearby cities policies and plans such as the Sunnyvale Bicycle Capital 28 Improvement Program and the Neighbarhood Guided Bike Routes plan. 17.Page 380, Transit Impact Griteria- The final bullet point shauld assess the I 29 project relative to VTA's Comprehensive C3perations Analysis Criteria. Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 6 18.Page 381, Roadway Modifications, Homestead Road to Wolfe Raad Access Paint- It appears that anly 10°l0 of project traffic wiil be 30 southbound. Why are two southbound left turn lanes needed? 19.Page 381, Roadway Modifications, Wolfe Road Access Point to Pruneridge Avenue- Dual right turn lanes creates an impact to northbound cyclists and pedestrians, i.e. creatian of a safety hazard. Mitigation in the 31 farm of enhanced bicycle and pedestrian raadway treatments and traffic controls should be identified. 20.Page 382, Roadway Modifications, I-280 Overcrossing, Homestead Road- How will possible impacts of a median ta access of property on 32 Homestead Road be assessed? Rre U-turns feasible? What are the parking impacts? 21.Page 385, Transit Infrastructure Modifications- Will bus stops conform to I 33 VTA's articulated bus standards? 22.Page 386, Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Modifications, Wolfe Road- Please add to the list on page 386 colored bike lanes Wolfe Road at the parking transitions between EI Camina Real, Homestead, and 34 completian of the Wolfe/Homestead bike lane gap. Also, in the fourth bullet paint, are there provisians for ongoing maintenance? 23.Page 386, Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Modifications, Homestead Road- For the provision of a planted median, a study of potential impacts 35 to property access, and feasibility of U-turns and potential parking impacts is needed. 24.Page 389, Diverted Trips Due to Closure of Pruneridge Avenue {continued from page 388)- Regarding the first paragraph, what are the numbers of 36 diverted trips? 25.Page 403, Mitigation Measure TRANS-4- Signal technology upgrades to De Anza/Route 280 interchange and the De Anza Boulevard corridor 37 should be considered. 26.Page 418, Impact TRAhIS-23- Sunnyvale strongly endorses this measure. The EIR does not fully account for delays to southbound Wolfe traffic, 38 which would be severely impacted by the triple left exit configuration. 27.Page 431, Impact TRANS-34, Evaluation of Potential Neighborhaod Intrusion, Summary- The first sentence is not a true statement if traffic 3g delay is considered. Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 7 2$.Page 434, Speciai Event Parking- The project includes the provision for special events, and Sunnyvale recommends consideration of the inciusion 40 af a condition of appraval limiting the number of event participants and/or number af events per year. 29.Page 434, Evaivation of Potential Neighborhoad Parking Intrusion, Nightingale Avenue, Meadowlark Lane, Leighton Way- The potential areas for employee parking may cause jaywalking to reach the proposed pedestrian gate to the site. Provision of a mid-block crosswalk is not an alternative as it would cause a safety impact. Consideration of aff-site parking in Sunnyvale needs to account for and reference Sunnyvale's 41 Residential Preferential Parking Code. Should preferential parking be instituted per the Code, then the analysis of available off-site parking becomes an infeasible project camponent and should be identified as such. The report should be modified accordingly. Also, regarding the Forge Drive bullet point, this is a private street which is not available for general parking. 30.Page 439, Table V.I-18: Left-Turn Vehicle Evaluation, Homestead at Wolfe - The report indicates that parking be removed at Homestead Road and Wolfe Road. Parking demand should be studied iri the area proposed 42 for parking elimination. Remaval of parking may constitute a patentially significant impact. 31.Page 444, Monitoring Program- Sunnyvale recommends that TDM monitoring and compliance shauld be independent of the applicant. The description of the Monitoring Program and the TDM Monitoring report 43 appear to conflict, with both the applicant and an independent City approved firm cited as having responsibility for data collection. D. Naise; 1. Page 465, Naise- There is an air intake close to Homestead Road, but it's not clear if that equipment will result in noise. If so, what are the expected 44 levels, and would any mitigation be required to ensure it meets the noise standards for Cupertino? Lett A1 cont. Aarti Shrivastava July 22, 2013 Page 8 The City of Sunnyvale appreciates your consideration of the requested study scope elements described above. Should the City of Cupertino elect not to do any of these analyses, or take a different approach to an analysis that will provide similar results and information, we would appreciate your notification to the City of Sunnyvale. 45 Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please contact Andrew Miner, Principal Planner, at (408) 730-7707, if you have any questions or concerns about items discussed in this letter. Sincerely, � _ _ Kent Steffens Director of Public Works cc: Gary Luebbers, City Manager Joan Borger, City Attorney Hansan Hom, Director of Community Development Trudi Ryan, Planning Officer Jack Witthaus, Transportation and Traffic Manager Andrew Miner, Principal Plan�er Lett A2 ca uy�, ■ ;r r: zti�, �� `'� -� Sc�nko Clard VQlley , ..�� :rr��Y '•� //////'^�r VIlqf�f DtSfflCt �,C]�l.�I J��`)E ��r �;� �J/I�f��r•. �� :�r�ost��:�•«cn�.su�r ��, _ i CI'rY OF M�RGAN f-111L � �Tq-��-� Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation PIanlNatural Community Conse�vatian Plan JUl 9,�Q�� P.��s.: J�1R Y Date Received City of L'up�xtit�o Depar[ment of Cnmm�mity De�elopment �� 1 � �� Rc: Applc Caznpus 2, L7�;lIt Cc�cnmcnt 1030�Tarre A�cnue �yy� Cup�rlino,CA 95014 This letter is suhmitEed on behalf'of the Santa Cla�•a Valley HabiiaL Il�ency(llgcz�cy}, The new flgency is �.loiiit Pawers Autl�nrity fnr:ned hy#he Citics c�f[�ilrc�y, Mc�rgai� I-Iill �iid Snti.Fnse, thc County of 5anta Clara,the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Elut�iority and the Sai�ta CIara Valley W�iter Distric:t. �i'h�r�:s�onsihiiity ofti�e A�en�}r is ta impleme�it tlie�a�it��C1ara Va1Ley Habitat I'lan. 1 1'3ie Plar�addi�css�s Statc and fcc]eral permifting c�f impacts tn listcd and likcly to bc listed endanr�ered species. The P3an is a I�abitai Conservation P1an under federal re�u[ations and a�i�itural CUmmunity C:onscrvafion Pla�i undca•Statc rcgulations. ��e species incorporated in the Plan is[he d��y uheckerspat Bullerl7y,�� Federal listed eiac�angere� spe�ics."Thc attachcei Novcmbcr 13, 2[312 i�ttcr to thc City ai'L'upertii�o frnm thc State 17e��a1-t�ncnt of I'ish and Game�now]�ish anc� Wilcllile}and tlie YJ.S. I�ish��t1cl Wilclfil'e Ser�ice noles an�aa�e 3 tl�at: All majar rc�nafnin�pnpulatinf�s of the butterfly a3�d ma�iy oi'the sensitiv� serpentine plant 2 popi�lations o�cur in areas subje�i to air pollutir�n from �ehicle exhaust aRd oihei�snE��ces ix� your.jurisdictian at�d tl�c 13ay�rca. 'I'h�r�faz•c,cvcxa x�fati�cfy srnal�atxinunts of nitra�cn�nu�d conl;ribute to a ctii�iulati�vcly sigriificantly im��aci by climinishin�th�populatiozi si�es of serp�nfine specic5 antl�nssibl}�t�ie chanccs oFsur�ival caf t�ic thrcaiancd �utter[1}i and il7c serpe�atine-specz�c plai�f species. The depositioi�af nitrogen is addressed on l�a�e 257 of�the alpple Campus 2]7raft I:IR. The D�IR notes tlaat"... in response tn the eii�irn��rraei�#al cc�r�cez�ns x�aised b}r tlae Habitat Plan, A��le lias �oluntarily �grc�ci to pay th�I�iirogcn Ucpositio�i �ce, �n�l�ich,ass�imiitg the��ro.ject gettee�les 35,]��i net new daily trips, wc��il[€amozuit tU a fee oC$]26,3 81." T'he�'ee wc�ulc� be paid un iss��ance nf the 3 grading permit fnr thc �rojcct. l'ayment�f the fee tn the Santa C'lai�a Vall�y Iiahitaf Agency will he aF�pi•e�iated, I�lcntifyi�zg the:fec as mitigatian for a cumulati�ely significant envirc�nmenla2 impact is requ�sted. It is also rcc�ucsrc� that in Fittu:•e en�irnnment�l re�iews thc[:ity e�f't`,upenina�dc�ress the impact af niirQ�;en�lepositiUn, as stuclied in the Santa Clai-�3 Valle} Tla6it��t �'lan,as a cuui�ilatively signi�canl cn�ironm�ntal in�pacf on a fcdcrally iistcd cndangcrcd spccics. 'i�liis rcqucsi is cansistent wif��the 4 altacl}ed �uid��n��pro�i�[ec� ta �he City �y ihe St�i#e �3ep�Yr•ime��i�e r'ish��ci WildfiFe�tnd the[�.5. Fisli and Wiidlifc Sc�vicc. Lett A2 cont. If�I can be�f assistati�e,please contact me at 40$-299-57$9 or 650-259-2341 or 5 ken.schreiher cr,cen.sccgn�.nr�. Sin�erely, y �t�a�-��' 5��.�a ICei��leth R. SchrLiber, tnterim I:xecutive(}fficer Santa Clara Valley Hat�itat flgency Attacluncnt: 3vovcmber 13, Z012 Letter Cc: CaliPornia Deparirnent of�ish and�V'L�ilcilife{L}�i�rc.it�hnstcan,Crai�1�V�i��tuian, 5cott Wilson) i?.S. 1�'ish and Wildlifc 5crvicc(1�ikc'1'hoz��s, L'ay Goud�) Santa Claz��Va�ley FIabitaf Agei�oy I»�plemeniation anc{ Gaver�iin�I3oards Lett A2 Att , �. , UCPARTMI;I�T UF FISI�I AyD GAVI�: U. S.FISH ANn�VII�DI,I�F SERVICE e«��;�� 3nY n�r�rn r�r��nr� snr.K�Mrr�TO rrsi��rvi�wr�,�]r.��:orFic� 732)SILVEftAhU 1"ltAlL 28[]Q CC]TTAG�WAY,Roan�w-adQs �1A�'A,CA 94558 SACNAML"�iT(7,Cn 95�25 (7Q7)9+�4-5SOf} (41Ci}414-GGi]U ��L - r ..�,�'� ln reply refertn: 08 ESMI'4a-20 l3-'1'A-UOG8 Na�e�nUer 13,2412 l�Ir. .�ohn Dvu�hty, ['ity of'East PaIa�1Ito VIr, 'Terrencc Grind�ill,C,ity of�ewark Vlr. Hanson Horn,C:ity of'Sunr�yvalc Nlr. Steve�i Mc�iarris,C'ity c}f��lilpit2s Me•, [{��in ililey, City af Sant�f C:lara Mr. Jcff Sc��w4b,City nf Frc�i�o�1ti Ms.F1rti Shri�vast7va,City Qf C:iipertino Mr. Randy Tsu�la,[:ity o�Mnui�tain View Mr, Curtis Willia�ns,City crf]'��ln Alto i7ear Plan��ing Dis'�ctors: Subject; SLreamIiitin�Mitigation tnr lu��acts to Biola�;ical Rc�ourc�s Thc Californi�Department aF Fish and Gamc{CT]I�G)�i�d Unitc�� Stales l'ish �tnd Wildlite Serviae(FWS)(Wilcllife �1�c;ncies]�re writing,jn's�itly tn d��aw your attention to F�rogress ii�ynt�r re;gian to s€reamline cc�mpEiance wilh the envirnn�no»iad l�iws appli��blc co cie��lopment projects �t��rrnved c�r carri�:d out l�y pf�rtizipating jt�risdictiUns. 1. C]vcr_v_icw crf'thc Santa Clara Va1Le Habilat F1anlNatur��1 Communities C��nser�ntion Plan(SCVH1'� Thc S2ntfl Cla�'a Valley�Ia�iitaF Pla�iliJ�t��r�jl Cc�miilin�ities C;t�ns�3•vatit�rl Plati (SCl�HC') establishes fi fr�me�vo�•k hy w11ic11 lul�ire de�reio��meEat prnjects wit�iiii participati��jui'isdi�tintis inay comply wif3i sc�eral state and federal regul�Tnry proccsses th��t�pply t�� ihose�ie�elopment projccts rc;�;aedless ot'the jurisdictian's p��rticipation in ftie SCVI-�P, S��ciiic�fly,the SCVIIP st��ndardizes avoidanc�, i]�1�11I1]17i1t3011s niitiQ�lion,2{I1C�CU111�7C115�iI1U11 1'CC�L€kl'�111�11tS SC� ((Yl"fk1 LIl L�lC Fedcral I;n[laiigered 5pecies A�t�ESA), tltc C�li['oi-riia�:nci�iigc�-ed Sl�c:ci�s A�l(Cf15A), T}ic Natural Carnmu�iity L'onservati�zi Pl�i3iiin�A�t(NCC:P}, thc Ca]ifor�li� Fnvii�onme��lal C}tiality Act(CEQA),tfic Natin3zal 1';m�iz�omnental Pnlicy l�ct(�]L'sf'A}as well �3s in nth�r eipp[ic�E�le laws a�1d re�;ul�itit�r�s xelating to biolagical and n�tur�.l resUUrces within t��e�31a�i3�i��;are�i,so tht�t publsc and}7ri�ate tt�tions will l��go�erned equally s�nd consisic�itly, lirus reclucing d�lays: expenses,ans�re�;uiacpry d��plicalio��. Lett A2 Att P1aiiE�iiig Directnrs Nave�n6er 13,2012 Pagc 2 The fnundatinn fnr t�tat cnusistency ai�d effi�iei7cy is t�}e SC:VI-�P'S analysis nf eiivii�oninenta� impacts and de�eioprneni�1'�lnng-terili sti•ate�y Fc�r tkie mit.igatinn�s�ici eoi�servatin�af 1 S end�ngered,thrcatcn�d, anci rare s�ecies witl�in Santa G'lara C;auitty. Miti�;ation n�easu�'es set forth witliin the SCVHP ii7clude: the acqitisitini�af'Iat�d an�i t}�e cre�atian c�f a resei-ve system«f pro#e�ted lands;long-ic:rm manageine��t; inciuciin�enh�zz�ement and restoration of tlie naturxl co�n�r�unitics an tl�ose lai��ls; a caing�rehensiv�set��#'palicies to protect riparia�i car�•idoi;s and atlie�'�tqu�ti�resources; and specific a�uidaiice�nd minimi.aiian mea5iires to be applied tn new de�eio�nnent projects. Thrniigh t��c SCVI�P, ['ees�vill Ue cnl�ected frai�a new dev�lnpi�ent prnjects to ['und 1liese ine�isut�es, irlGludiilg fees for loss t�f]�r�hitat, ��he SC,V�[P was de�cic��ed �in�� +ill bc inzpie�nenteci loc�i�ly hy i17e C�u«iy Uf S�trita C:l�r�►,cities of San Jas�,Morgsui 1-lill anri Liilroy, Santa Clar�a Vallcy Waler I7sstrict,Santn C'lara V�al1Ey Transpoi-t��tion A��Lhority and aii Iai�lcnte�tiin�Gntity establis�ied i�y these lo��l agencies, Most nf thase local agencics l�a�e�lready ado��ted the SL'VF.IP�nd the Wildlife A�encies atiticipate the City aCSan Jase and 5anta Cl�ra V�slley Tra��spoi-�a[ion Authoriiy will adopt the SCVHP in Deceinher?I]l2, II, Th�SCVHP Lst�blishes Consistencv tn Strna�uline 1?at�tici.patin�Jurisdictians' Comnliaizce with CEQA f��r I7e�el��nent I'rojects. CE�A is ainong thc�mlirnnmental regulatior�s for w�(lich tl�e SCVHP fa�ilitates cninpEi�►�1c�. �3y way nf haa�cgraiind, C;I�Ua,-�a��,��s tn��ar�y�«u�i�agency a�ps•ovin��3�c<i�7'ying out a proje�l foz�wt�ich [liere is st�bst�»tial e�ieiencc af��otenti�►lly significa�7t itupa[;1 n�ust itientity measttres ncocssaiy to mitig�te impacts to a less-thnn-signi�c�iit l[:v�l. P�ib. Res. Ci�de ,�,' 21081. Miti�atio�i►tkcasiii'�s��ust be fe�sihle a��d eizfUi'ceahle. 1'ti�h, I�es. C.ode g 210�I.G. Acjequnte �niti�;ation measures can h�p�triicularly di1'ficulk to identiFy for cutnulati�cly si�nificant im��acts. `I'hc ahscitce offeasiUle ai�ci en£c�rceahl�measures to miti�;ate i�z�pacts to �t less-thnn-sig�lificant ]evel [ii�di�i�}ually or curm�latir�elyj resi�l�s in inc:��ea5ed pl�unin�tii��e ancl prnj�ct cos[s Uy remn�ing the t�Ptia�i of comptyii�g with C�:QA vi�a Mitigaled�f��;ati�e 1]ecl�ratian. C�cn iPa project wot3ld ntherwis� tri�get�ait l;nvironr�tental Tmj�ac:l 1�epc�s�t,ihu zUsenc�oF feasible measures tn mitigatc to a less-th��rsi�nific<<nt lc:��l will i2ecessitate thc le�id x�;ency's cansicici�atioi� of whether it is apF7rops�iate ta adopt a st�l�in�iat ot�oG•e2�ridii�g considcrations. Cal. 1'ub. Ites.Code§ 21 d8](b). The SCVHP and atl�ei'siinilai�re�int�fll pl�nnin�;e1'faris est�hlish stnnclardi�ed,eqizitable, feasil�le tind en#nrceab�e m��sur�s hy which�artioipating.jtirisdictians can i��itig�te impacts tn a l�ss-ihan-si�;nitic�nt Ievcl. '1'hc inipact and uliti�rili�n u��alyses iif th� SCVHf'�n�c based nn exte�isi�e si�a[ysis xnd the best available scie�lcc and}ra��c restilte�i iF� tl�e identifi�aitiozi and desi�;n of feasible initigation that n��y not li��c been icieiitifcd ii� ��t�ioz�err�ironmental do�uments. Lett A2 Att Planning airectors No�ember 13, 2012 Page 3 For example,t�ie SCVI-IP establisl�cs sta�idai•ds for mitigation nf im��acts tn sc�eral species tl��i depend an setpentine sails,sLtch as ll�e I3ay clzecicers�nt butterfly. Potentially signiCcant im�acts to such species incluc€e direct imp�cts i'esultin� fi•vm�;rotirid distus'hi�1b activiti�s as well as indirect,cual�ulative, a�lt1 highly disperscd impacts sucl�as nitrn�;en depositiQn, fii the past,t�e effccts nf�nitrogen de�osilion Qn special-status�akants and�vildlif'e have��en x�nd�;resliinated or wei�e not u�iderstoad; liowe�er, tliis is n❑ lnn�ez'true and rtitrn�en impaets are articulated in detaii in [�e 5CVI3�', 1�'itrngen depositinn is Icnown in l3a�e deleteria«s effects on many of the serpei�titie planCs i�i El�e SC'VFI['areA,as well as [l�e host plants thZt su��port the S��y chcckerspnt btitterffy. Industrial �oin1 saur�es and nanp��in�sources such��s aiit�moUiles emit nitragen c[�i�}pott�lds into the air. 13ecause sei-�entiiie s�ils tend to be i�ulrierit poor,anc�nitroben de��asitiou ai�ificially fcrtilizcs ser��cntine soils,nitrogen cfcpdsitios� facilitates the spread of in�ass��pliiIlfi 5Il�ti]L'5, NOZI-t7iltiG•e �nrtu�il grassc;s graw ra�aidly,cn�bling t��em tn oul-cnm��ct�serpcntine species. T'l�e disp�a�ement c��tliese sE�er.ies,and su�se��uent d�cline nFthe se�era] Cederxlly-list�d spccics, iizcluciing the E�uttcrt�y and its lar�al hQGt.plants,h��s��een dncumenied nn Ct�y«te Rid�e in centr�l Santa Clflra Caunty{ft�e last remaiisiilg corc popi�iatiai�af l�iitterflies}, NitF�o�en t�ncls l'U Ue tiblltly re�ycled Uy the plants and microUes in infertile svils like tliosc deri�ed fron� serpentiues,so Fcrtiliza#ia» iznpa�ts aouIci persist tilez•e f'or years and result iii cuinulati�e hal�itat dc�,iad�tion. '1'l�e iiivasion of nati�e grassfantis Uy in�asir�e ni�dlor non-»�ttive-species is i�nw recognized as one af ihe�najQr cai�ses of the decliEie of this lisled �nimal, All u�ajnr remainin�po��uiatians af thc bu�t�rfiy an�i n��ny nf the Sensili�+e serp�ntine pla�tt popui�tions occur iri areas sub.ject to�ir pnll�ition fl-am�ehi�lc cxh�ust aiid Uther sout�ces in yUUr jtirisdictia�i and thc Say area. ThereFore, e�en re[aliv�ly small�imau��ts of��itrogea7 cnul�i cuirtriUute ta a�ttrn�tlatively si�i�ificantly iris��act E�y diniinishii�g the��a�ulatian sizes of scrpenti�ie spu�ies and passibly llie ckiances nf survi�al of the threaEc�i�d b�itterfly and tl�� se�pe��tiiic-s��cci�c pla�lt spccics. Tl�e SCVIIP's conser��ation strategy is dcsigncd zitit niily to i�nitig�te impacfs tn ai�ti fi�rther the rc�o�ery c�f 13ay checicersp�t 17utterfly llut in�orpor�tes s�ccific inc:asilres to minimize and mi#igate nitragen de��a�ilian. Sec� f'ii�al S�nta Cl�r�t Vallcy Hahitat Cnnservaliori Piaizt, Gha��fcr 5 Gotisetvation Str�tegy,Table 5.1c�iclentifyii�g SC.V�II' 1 I.1 ta cansisi of'proteetinti c�F 4,55�aci-es of inndeled B�y chec�Cerspot hulCes�ily hai�itat�IIIC:IULIFI7��},DOU a�res af serpcntine grasslr�z�ds in corc pnp�ilatioiis of Bay ch��lf�rs}�ot b�itterfly,tv prote�t� ran�e of sto��es,aspeets, an�inicrnhabitats As par[nf i�ie�7ese�ve Syste�n within tl�e tiC«dy tll'C�J. S[�e re[So,T�l�la S-l� [identifying initigatioi� u�e�stir�s in add��ess nifrogeii dep��sition u�clt�dit�g CIRASS-I,GRrS,SS-2, CiRA55-3,GRASS-4, Ci1tASS-7, LM-8, and LM-11), 'I'Fie SLVHP alsa provides an i�p-to-date�nd coir�pz•et��tz�ive c:a�iser��tiori a�1�i initigation strate�y For burrawing c�wi,which specics is lilccly to accur in your jurisdicti��t�, l�or inany years,thc Vti'ildlifc Agen�ies I�ave reco�ni�e;d thG neeci fnr�c«m�rehcnsive c�nscr�atinn ai7d mitig,itiUn Lett A2 Att ['l�nnii�g I]irector� November 13,2Q]2 Page 4 strrttegy Fc�r bu��rowing owts in tlie snuth I�ay area�n�ot��cz'pc�rti��ns of C�lifornia. Ii� 1 t)95,DPC �rep�rct� lhe"1995 SlaFf lteporl on Burrowing dwl Mirig�tinr�,"��vl�ich conLaine.d recnmmended hiirrowin�;owI mitigation me�siir�s and vii��i'ow stia-�ey tech��iq�ies inteildid to aff;et the l�ss nf l�aUitat�nd sfuw�r re��erse further decline of this s�ecies, Nntr��ithstandin�; ti�esc measures, bvrf•owin�owls f�a�e co»ti�iued ta declinc:in portiUns of their range. DFG deteritlincd fltat re��ersing de�liuin�pnl�ulation a�ad range trends for burrowsng awls r�c�uired impler�lent�ttion of i:1o��e effective conservation actions, In 2a12,litcr c�aluating fhe effic�cy nf the 1995 Siaff Repnrt,CllFG pi•c�ciu�et9 an a�p�iated"SLaff Report on Burrnwing Owl Mitigatinn" (2Q i 2 Sfaf1" Kepnrt}. The 2�[2 St�Eff]ZeparL�3rovides a37 iF��di�ted summ�iry of the bLSt��il�hle sciei��c's analyses of a�oidancc, ��inii��izatiu» anc�t��itigalian ai3pro�ches for burrowing nwls. '�'he SCVHF��ro�ides Uoth a i�ziligalinn and cnnser�ation frameworlc f'ar hurrQwin�;owls Gansist�nt with the gc��ls nf lh�2012 StufCRepart. Ils an cxa�nple,the SC;1�HT' estal�lishes standards for the procection nf fl�c wvsl�rn burrowing o��+l, in�•ludii7g a}�rolti�itinn an dis[iirl�anc� c�r rclncatinn nf'owl ncsts 131rnughnut the�reeding se�ts�m,requiretnent nFa 25[�-foot buf�fcr arot:ii�i occu�ied hi�rr�ws For ail cnn5tr�iction ac[i�iiy, and� de�elo�er fee fu�lded sysleii7 to n�itigfrie�h�lpss of ow2 l�aUitat�atised�y a de�elopmcnt Pr��jt�t Uy permflnent preserv�iion af nff scttin�suitablc burrowing owl liabitat I�sncls Aiid mann�ement and enha�lc�tt�cnt af lands tha[ suppart awls. Tktese;two examples{nitrngen ciepositian and hui•ro��ii�g nw1} illustraCc the mannEr ii�whicl� Gl�e S�VFIP de�elnped rneasw-es ia mitigate impa�ts anci demnnstr�ite the Fcatiihility nf such measures. Since C:FQII requires im}�lementatic�n nf all fe�isible mitigatinn mcasures cuen far iznpzcis thzt �a�tnot be rnitigated to a]c�s-tha�z-significant le�el Znd the 3�Zitigation program developccl f'or the SCHVP in�liides tr;asil�lc miti�afion sneasures,olh�r juris�iicti��s shoul��c�evelo�a aiid iinplement similar Feasible mitigation far si�;niS''icant imp�cts. T��e Wildlife Aben�ies reco�iunei�d yc�itr ju�'i�dictian de�elo�and inctn-por�te con�parablc n�itigztio��meas«res!'or project5 lh�►l result in signifi��nt impa�ts. We belie�e gi�en the dG�elnpmeni af fe�sihle miti�atian rneasures �mder the SC'V1I[', it wou[cf be diFfictilt i��r nther Ic�c�l le��c��gen�ies to�u1o��t a Stateiiie��t nf[]vez�riding Considei-ations absunt inco�poralioa�of siinilar t'csiSiUle ii�itigatinn ine�5iires un�i�iny siich n�cri'icic would be subject to gr�ater public scrutiny. Tt wniFld he parli�til�arl��dif�ct�ll for s� C�QA lend a�cncy to c;stahlish the adequ�cy of any Stateme�7t nf O�e�•riding Coizsicieratians based c�n ccnnomic hardsF�ip naw that thc SCVT-3P IlA5{jl:l]][7ilSli'�FtS:Cj tl7flt�i feasibl�iiiitigatio�z progra»i ancf fea siriEC�ttre�an be i��lplemcuccd tivithout such har�iship (s�e Lcoraui�zic Imp�acl ,4nalys•is oflhe Sra�zla Cfa►•n l�relfc�y Ilaliitcr� C'ofaservaliora Plar�; Willda�i l^itiancial Sei��iGes, 201 i)and thus we t�elie�e st�ni�ld not be ciied in any futur�5tnt�izients o€'O�erridsng Cvnsider�tio�ls. Lett A2 Att Pl�nni�i�llirectors No�ember �3,2Q 12 P�ge S lll. SCV1��'Standardizes A�nidance 117iuimi7ation M�ti ation ancl Cnni�ensat9nn Requirements [:ncfer Uthcr i,ai��s. I�i acitlitinn to initi�atinFZ i�e�uiremcs�ts c�f C�QA,c�evelopinezlt projects intsy l�e sul�jcct to en�ironz�iental re��ilation tirider athez�laws' includcd �ut�iflt limit�d tU L'sSA �ii1d CLSA, 5eetion 9«f the�SA prahibits tl�e t��lce c�f any fodei�aliy-liste�i aziimal s�ecies by any pe�•son. "Take"is defined hroadly as meanin�"...to harass,h�rm,pursue,hunt,slZn�t,watEnd,]sill,trap, capiui'c,n�'�flllect,or�ttteti�pt to eii�a�e ifi�ny siich�onduct." "Har�ii"li�s been �tirthcr dcfi�ted to include significai�t habitat�nnditication or destiltclion that res��lts i��death or iiiju�y to a listed spe�ies by interferi��g witk� essez�tial veha�i�ral ��att�rns,such ��s L�rceding,fara�in�,nr rs;�tin�. "Har��ss"is deli�7ed as an intenticmal or negligent act or an�issi��n �vhich cr�atGS i�ie lilcelihond of injury to�arildfil:c hy annoying it to su�l�nn exterlt as ln significxntly disrupt noi-�nai l�cha.�in3•a! patkerns whiclz in�lt�{le,h�it flre not iimited t«,hreediFig, feedii�g,c�r slielteri�t�{50 C1'R 17,3}, Take incidcntal to an olher-wisc lawful<ictivity inay be autIiarized i�nd�r F,SA by one o#'t�vo �i�ncedu�'cs, If�a federal age��cy is in�ol�ed�vit[3 Lhe p�rs7liCtiizg, futtdin�,nr carrying nut af'the acCi�ity��d a ticdei-�ily-listed sEiecies is�oing to be a�lverse€��affec[ed or its desi�n�ted critical hahiiat ihen ini[iatinn of fUt'iital cansultliio�i betweeii tht�t�g�ncy at�d PWS �urs��ant to section 7 of ESA is req�zired, If a I'ederal a�ency is not in�nlved and federally-listed specics may be tal«n as part af tl�e pro.ject,then an Incident�ii T�ikc l'ermit pursua.nt to sectit�n i��a)(1)(�3}af ESIt shoulci i�e al�tained in ordcz'ta a��nid�iolatii�g Federal i1w. Wilhoiit lhe SCVI-IP,tli�re would i�c unusitigated impacts�f veliicle exi�aiisl tlz�t�vnuld ziced to�e addressed by+f�rt«re ptibiic a»ci private seetqr de�elopme�it. Failtire le�uddress and�c�itsult�fith F�VS, li�i�nugli nne of'll�c twc� ineth�ds dc5cribcd �tbove,i�egarc�iiig tlie impacls��f�Gliicle exl�aust�aticl athcr soiiraGS of nitro�;en depositinn)on i=�dcrally-listecl sE�ecies wn�ild c�anstitiile an umnitig�ted�ibriificai�t. environmental impact anc�Gvn�Fld cniistitute a<<iolatio�i ni'ESrI, C�SA pi•nhil�its tdke of'wildliie and i�Itints li5teci�s lhreatened nr cnda�i�ur�ci by t�le i;alifoz�ii�t Pish auci Ga�nc Con�mFSSion. '1'akc is dcfizieci u��der rhe C�ilI1fC11'111ti l�ish aud Ci�u7e Codc as any action nr atiempL tn"iiunl,pursue,c�tch, ca��ure,or 3�ill." l.ike ESA, C�SA�llaws exce}�tions ta ll�e pro�ibitian for tak�that occurs during othe��wise lawful ac�i�ities. 'I'lie recFuirements of an applicatioii Fcar i»�identnl f�ke i�nder C;LSA a3-e d�;sGribeci in Sectioil 2D81 c�i'[lie C;aiifnrnia�?ish and Garne Code. Incicient�sl take of state-fistcd species may �e�utlia:�iTed if an a��plica�it submits an appro�ed�ala�� that minimizes anci"fully mitigates" lh� in��icts c�f fl�is tak�, � Alt�iough[hc SCV�1P is designed primariIy to onmpEy with lhc ESA,L:�SA,and Iht itiC:L:f'Act,thc SCVHP is al::a CO]lsi5lC�ii with othCr fCCIGt�II ancl slate w•f[dlif�.ind iel�ated I�iµs�snd re�ultttioi�s inihidii�b;(1)Miqr.itury I3ird Trea[y Acl;(2)Eiald 1':aglc�nd Ciolc[ett Eagle i'rutcction Aol;{3)Calil`onaia Pisl��nd Came Cade 5ecfivns�511, 470{l,5650 and 5515(fiilly rruteeted spccies};{4}C:�fi�'ornia Fiali snd Gamc C'odo 5eclia�►3503{l�iid ncsts); {S}C:o-ilifvrnia l�ish�nd Ua�i��Code 5�cti��35{)3.S(Girds uf�rrey);{C})Nationa] �rrviroilmcnfa[€'ulicy A�i of 1969;{7)Clean Wsler Ac!nf'1972 5vc�inn5 4fi1 ;ind 444;{S)Por�cr-Colagne 1'Vnter Quality Cnntrol A�t;and {9)Califoriti�Fish.iiid�a��tc C:��dc 5u�fi�ns 160�1G1G(L,ikt•[�r�lraamboc!}. Lett A2 Att P2anniilg Dire�tnr�s No�emher 13,201� Page 6 iV. CaQrdinatio�i with flic SCVfIP Lncal A cncies s�ntl V4'itdlife.A cn�ics. 'Che�C'VH.P is an itnpartai�t step ft�rw�►rci in pt'otcctin�;e�}ilai3�ered, tl.�reatened, prici ra��e s}�ecies and tl7eir habitats in Sani� Cl�zra County. We expect that,jurisdictians nnt dit•ectly�articipating i�i the�CVIIP will follow re�{iiirei��eiits in hntl� state an[l fcc��i'al law tn im��lemeiit coi�zparak�lc i�liti�a#ion measi�res�i}ci aUtain pertnits �vf�en ncccssa�y Por pro.jects under#i�eir autharity w a�hie�e tiiis import�nt goal. As gart of the CL(7A re�iew pracess and througlt Wildlife A�ency autharicatic�ns,lI7e Wildlife Age��cies will pravic�e irrf'arittflti�i�addressinD the adcRuacy of pra�osed mitigatiian mcasures for szgnifi�ant �rc�ject iin}?aets, In addifion, fo�Iowir�g final adt��tioiz nf'tl�e SCVHP,tl3e Wi€dlife A�cncies�nd the loc��l a�encies parli�i�3ating in tlie SCV]-1P will ari��ngt a warltshtyl�a�ld int�itc your jurisdiction to��rficipatc to descri�e SCVI•IP im��lementatic�n and how yaurjurisclictian may CI�VCIqj)COIl�]Jcll'AU1C I111Cl�iltlC}il aE�p�•oachc� ii�r CFQII ar2d Stafe and �'ederal �i1da»�ored 5p�cics Act cr�mpli�ince. Thc l�v ildlife Agertcies are a��ilable to discuss s��cci�s i��p�ct, fcasible mili�;��tion, and�ertriittiiig neecis will� ynur jurisdiction. ]f yo«ha�e yuesti«ns,}yle�se cnr�t�ct Mr. C't•aig l�ciglltir�an,C;UT'G Actitib ��z�irot��nentaI Program Ma��ager,�t(707}944�-5577; ar Mr, Milce Thomas,�'WS Cvnservation Pl�snnin�Di�isiQn C:hief, at(91b)414-6GQ�, Sinr:erely, � � �3r.� �f�r��. Cay C. Cctucic Scott Wilson Assist�int l�iefd Supeivisvr 1lctitig Regioiial Mana�er Endan�ered S�eci�;s PrU�;ranz I3ay I)clta IZ��iQn Sa�ramentn Fisl�a��d Wiidlife Office C�tlifornia Ue�3ar•ti»ent of Fish and Game U.S. I'ish t��1d Wildlif'�Sci•�icc cc; Nr. [�a�id SischaFf, CJirec:tor c�f['I�tinniitg and rnti�irnnn�ental S�r��ices, Cil}�ol Gilroy VIs, Dchl3ic CauUle,Sant� C:l�ira Cvun�y�fF'ice of t�ie CaL�nty Exec�iti�e Mr.]ne I-Iorwedel,Plannir�g flircotnr, City of San.lose Mr. Igna�ia Gonzale2,17ir�cfor of Planning atld iJ�velopnlent,5�nla Clara Cc3unty Mr, :Vlitch C}shii�sky, Cnmm�inicy a:t�l l;cont�i��i�De�e�opment I7ir�;c�or,City of 1�Icir�;an IIill Mi•. Kci�Schreil�cr, Prag�•am Mana�er, 5afit�i C:la�•a Vai]cy Hal�itat Plaii Lett A3 Frnm:Qawn Cameran(niailta:l7awn,Carrter9n�ardas�caov,nr�rJ Sent:Monday,]uly 22, 2�13 5:i�PM to: apple[ampusz;�imm Borden;Aarti Shri�asta�a;Piu Ghpsh Cc: Michael Murdler;�an Coilen;syivia.�alEegos;a�eeo.s« nv_nr� 5u6ject:County af Santa Clara Comments on App�e Campus�bEIR Attached are the�amments from the Cpunty pf Santa Glara qn the Apple Campus 2 aEIR. A hard copy will follaw hy mail. I 1 Please confirm�eceipt of this e-mai1. Thank you, Qawn Cameron Cuunt�'Transpnrialiun I'iannui f'laiv�in�,Land�r��kl[�p��itni k 4ur1•�1�Unit Cuun��of 5anla Clara f�uacis&AirpnrLti I]e�anmen[ ]Ol Sky�+nrt Driv�,San I+�,CA yFl li1 S.i��ii,�.�r�iE�i i•rn��•r�t�t.tic_y�i}_�1�; P: �l[7fe-57?-2�b� N: 4L�b-kll-[127F �roTrc�: �'his rmail mctitia�•c antilur itti att�ichmcnls mav cnnlair� intUrmulinn�hcit is umficl�nlial c�r restri�•lccl. ]t is intenciec!onlv fc�r lhc indi�i�lualti rruncc]ati ricipieniti in the inetitici�r, !f you �u•r N�`f�n Elll[I1llfILCLI fl'Cl�I1CI1S.Y[1LI arc�+rohihite�i from utiin��,iiclir•erin�,c�itiirihutin�.�.�rintin�.inpyinr,or ditirlrnin�[he iTieSti�ige or cc�l�tcnt[o nth�rti�u��inuti��lelctc the metir�t�ze 1'rnm yoi�r rrnz��uEer.If'ynu have rccei�rd lhi�iTiestiure in errnr,�lcutie nnFif'y�thc�rndcr hy rcturn em�il. Lett A3 cont. County a�' S�nt�a �lara �,��t�;v;. �- I�(7ijCI5�u i�! Rirpnrts C7e��a:'li i ienl �,•=ti�1�I I f-� di� :— - �$r �, "' li�t Sk}'��i�n llri�•� 1.], `�5_�+��' ti�il�use,C�IiIc7r�tii1S1"�! II7-13[7� 7'r� Gt' I-�r7x�;:i�a.�.[x� T�tfv?2, 2U�� 31i�f![]511 S�11i01'��C117Ei' �cpartmes�t�7FC�zii�7iunity De�e2�pi�icnt CiLy�f'Ci�p�i�ts�in l D:U{.1 I��rE'c A�ei3tic cu��s�a, cn �sa�� SUB.��CT: Ap��Ie Cam��us 2 Prn,jcct 1)raft l�,nvironji�i�ttal li�ip:zct ftep�i�t—tit.it� Clearinghuus�#: ?I111�fiZ{IS5 C]ear Ms, Gl�ash� '171aillc Lar ll�t np�}art��ni[y tu coxniiieiit oi� lh� lJ��a��t rn�ii�anmen[al im}�act �te}��rt[`'llL.Ift"} �'��i tl�e propo5cci Apple Canlpiis ? Prt��e�l {"pZ'�j��")- ��his l�tter cnnveys 5a�ita C:lara Cnunty's �'`Cot��ty"] commenls�ei•mazye to [he C:aiuity's statul�ry responsil�ilil,y. As cliscussed with the('il�+ ni� CuE��rti�zq (`'C'ity"], the Cc�unly�s cnncerz�s are i��n-t��lci. Pirst,the L71;IR in�orrcct�y can�ludes envirc�iaFiierztal impacts t❑ tlic Cntitnty's�xpi`�sswavs�vut�lcl t'e��ii�i"si�izi[i�ailt anci uiia��iti��Ulc" 2 hccause the pr�posecl uziti�atir?n is ouisi�� lhe Gity's jurisdickinn, 5e�ond, tllc 17LIPti dc�es nUt idc.zriiFy IlOE'j'}l'C7�705�1]}11i�(iLlUll RlL'c15111'�`S IOt'fI1C IJf(]Jt'Cf'S 1177]7eiL't 417 tlle lt1[LCSCL'Ils��i c)t��..�IWf'Ci3�� x��ress�i��t�• ancl S�}rat�ga A�cntte—a critical elem�nt c�i�thc r�ad system se.r��itt�the i'ruje.c.t�ir�,t. l'lease tii�d belo�� lhe Cotu�ty's speeitic comi��nts�izd recon�mei��latians. i. r:.l�,��,-;�r,�«�r��«�,��«r 1,��,7�tt�r.i� ��Si�,ri�i/ircrrt!rrizc!{i��ur�ui�lc�l�le. " 'Clz� I}E:I�t iGlenlires sigi�ili�an� ei��iini�incntal inZpacis to the Catuity's e..��r�.ss�vays a�3d vari�us city sireets anci ��ra�oses ]771[1��L1Dll 11]CnSLII'L'S, includin� 1]LIR'I'rans-l0, 11.2(].?l, �m�l ?2. The I]I:I��,IlUWEV�I', cr3�t�.lirdes t}�al i��1�<�cTs�re sig��ific.ant�a3a�1 unsivoi�iabl� L�ecai�se suc.li i��acrs are ext�-a- .j�trisdictiai7al and tlie C'ity �.aiznot �uara�lt�e llic cosi�pletio�� oFa n�ili�atic�iz �i��asui�e. Tl�� C.atu�ly �hjects tn tllis cur�clusioii as prt.m��ture a�ld based oti i��a�riii�ate assiiilZptic�i7s, 3 '�'he i'ity htts�duly to miti�;ate the unvi�'onmenlcil impu�t at�pre�je�ts it a��prcz�es, il'feasiUlc. "1'lie miti}�atin�l�f si�;i�ilt�a2zl eilvii'umz�enl�l iii�pacts nutside a lcad cigc�icy'S �LIC15{IlCES011 cll}CI Ctlll[i'OF i5 11U�f]['1"SC' infeasi}�lc.� Nor are �uiti�ation s�}east�res z�zad� iizlcasible hccailse im}}Iementation �an�zot la�gtiaranteeci �vith coi��plete certai��ty. The D1sIE� iS SlICi1F Qi] �'VI7clI. 44'!II 'City a1-Marir�z v. L3ozre7 tif'['rustees Uf'the Cali!'vrni�l Sfa�e �liiiversily, 39 C.�L�I"'3�41,3?3 [?fli)[r), 13u+�rd nf 5u��crvisnrs:�11ik��v�tissru�ian. aissrics 2 Varan�. r�a�•e r�aru°se. hrn Yca�;c�r.5.Jnse.��l�simltfari � C'rninil'L'•.��•cutivi�: 1riUr�'��.5rfii�l i r�o, Lett A3 cont. cum��l t3tc pra.�ect spoi�sar tn ptfrsue the miti�atint�s, L71'C'C117�I'iL7LlL4' f�it}Ci117L LC�1[+�I'CI illtCl'l�i1tG 3 mitigatic�ns. �1�r►=i1 ��7L' CIC1CLlill�Il� ]'}1'L'SLI�J�]USL'S [�lt 11114]�iL'IS�i�'e una��nid�ihlc, '[�f�e []I�IR sl�niilcl �xplain tf1�mechaiiisFi� tn be �ised to ensut'e foll�sw tllrnugh ��i�tl�c�pon�nr's }�art, e.�. C011t. det�elnpmeni ags'ee��ciii, �ancliti�ns�f'�p�}rnv�i,eLc. 2. Ir�l��•s�crio��U/�Lutii�r•er7cc Gxp�'c�s.rtis��rt.'cr�7r�,5�r,•crru€�u,�fti�c>>�rrc.. "1'fic ❑EZR I�tiils to id�nlily �h� Praject's significtis�l iinpact to tlie intes�sectiot�al'L�iwi�enc�]:x��ess�v�iy anti Sai�alo�x El�e.�itie. C'o�u�ty at�d C'ity staft�h�i�e met az��i abree�i th�9t the I'r�}ject �vill rt.sult in �i 6a°�� in�rease in the AM pealc houi'v�l7icles turnin�, let�l tut'n fi'om e�tstl7nt�t�d Saiz�atn�a 11��3�tE� to nnrthhc7ttnd I,$I�Vi'L'll{:C�}:F?1'G'SSG1•"r]y C�[tl}}i11'L'l� �i7��L'X1Stlll�— L]�1C�.gi•nu�i�i" �niin��es. Tliei'cfot��, �nce add�:�t, Praject ti'affi� will ec�u�il ap}�rnxima�ely �7`%of the latal (existiil�-r 6acic�inund � �3roject}IkM 4 peal:hour velii�les��ial;ii��ti�is tiir�iiiig mo��ement. "I�his is sig,7ificaiit because tl�e tot7l AM ��eal: Lra['fic G�ill el�eed ll�e tltt�tting c.i}�awitY aFlf�e exislin�;sin�[e left ttirn iai�e. 'T'1�� 13i:1[Z S�14llIC� SilCllflfy L�7i5 1171�73CC cllld 1'CC[]i17111t'tlCj �ippropriatc��ili��li�ns. F'nr examJ�rt, �3lease refer to t1�c Coi��rehensi�e Cnunty Txpresswuy SLtidy, G��hicii su�,�tsls le�igthe.ni»g thi: existin�; icit tiirn lans; �ii�d a�dina a secuixl �eft turi-� la��e. Th� Stt�tiy ��n bc ft}��d at ht l��:ll��v�v,scc�«v,n r�lydale.�p�'esswti_ys''I�le.i a u i t,h t m. IFyou hav��:iry yiiestions al�o�it ttzese comir�cnis, ple�se coizla�t I]aGVit C�imero�� at�4(]8-573-2�41�� ,r da��n.c�n��.rr�n�:'�rci�.scc�nv,org, Si��cerelv, ��• �,,�� .+t3 Mi� el Mur�ile:• D i i�ectr�i• �e: 5yl��ia G��ll��c�s, De��uty C'ounly 1_:xecuti�e Qan C-u11en, Dept�Ly [)ire�tar, Roatis�k llirporls ❑ept. Lett A4 From: Ro6ertson,Jesse G@DOT�esse.rQbeRson@dot.ca.gov] Sent: Monday,July 22,2fl13 R 59 PM To: lufalseed,Roy:Aarli 5hri�aslava:applecampus2 Ce: 7imm Barden;Qavid Stillman;Gary Chao;Aim,Erik@[}�7;Cameron,{]awn;john.ristow@vta.org;Rugenstein,Chris;Emoto,Casey; 5wierk,Raeert;state.GSearing�ouse@mpr,ca.gav Su6je�t: Callrans cvmmenis far lhe Apple Campus 2 6rafl EIR Altachments: Apple Campus 2 aEIR Letter 22JUL2013.pdi Attached�re Caltrans' �amments for the Apple Campus� DEIf�, Jesse Robertson.Assaciate Transpartation Pfanner Local Deve�opmenillntergavernmental Review 1 �ifice nf Transit 8�Commui�ity Plarn�ing Ca�trans ❑istrict 4 1 t 1 Grand Ave. (M5-1 Q�J ❑akland, CA 94�12-3717 Ph.51�-�8fi-5535 Fram: Molseed, Ray[mailta:Roy.Malseedn�TA.�RG] Sent: Monday,July 2Z, 2013 3:44 PM Ta: 'aart+sCp�cupert+no.org'; 'applecampuszC�eupertinQ.org' C�: 'timmb@cupertino.arg'; 'davids@cupertina.org'; 'garyc@cupertino.org'; Alm, Erik@�OT; Cameron, Dawn; john_ristowC�vta.or�; AugenStein, Chris; Emoto, C3Sey; Moaseed, Roy; Swierk, �o�ert Suhjert: Apple Campus 2 draft EIR. Aarti, Attached are VTA camments on the Apple Campus 2 ❑raft EIR and TIA. Rlease eontinue to forward notices of availability regardir�g documents for this projert to Roh 5wierk and myself. Thank yau far the appartunity ta comment. Pleas�cantact me if any questions. Ray Malseed Senior Environme�#al Flanner VTA {408}321-5784 Rov.ma lsee d C��ta.a r� Lett A4 cont. Frvm: R��ertson, ]esse G�DDT [mailto:�esse.ro�ertsonC�dot.caga�� Sent: Monday, ]uly 22, ZOi3 4:59 PM Tv: Malseed, Ray; Aarti ShrivasCa�a; apple�ampus2 Ccc Timm 6orden; David Stillman; Gary Chao; Afm� Erik�ap(]T; Cameron, Dawn; jQhn,ristowCa�vta.ora; RugensteRn, C�ris; Emoto, Casey; 5wierk, Robert; 5tate.clearir�ghouser.a�apr.ca.gov Suhject: Caftrans �omments far the Apple Campus 2 ❑raft EIR Attached are Caitrans' camments far the Apple Campus 2 ❑EIR, 2 Jesse Rot�e�tson, Associafe Transpartation Planner Local �evelapmen�Ilntergovernmental Review Dffi�e of Transit & Community Planning Caltrans District 4 111 Grand Ave. �M5-10D) Qakiand, CA 94�1�-3717 Ph. 51 a-285-5535 Fram: Molseed, Roy [mailto:Roy.MolseedC�VTA.ORG] Sent: Monday, ]uly Z2, 2013 3:4a PM To: 'aartis@cupertino,org'; 'appfecarnpu52@cupertino,org' Cc: 'timrnb@cupertino.org'; 'da��ds@�upertino.arg'; 'garyc@cuperti�ro.org'; Alm, Erik@oDT; Cameron, Dawn; jQhr�.ri5tpwi�vta,�l'Cl; Augenstein, Chris; Emota, Casey; MafSeed, Roy; Swierk, Robert Suhject: Apple Campus 2 ❑raft EIR Aarti, Attached are VTA comments on the Apple Campus 2 ❑raft EIR and TIA. Please continue to farward notices of availability regarding doeuments far this prajeet t❑ Rob 5wierk and myself. Thank y�u far the opportunity to comment. Please contact me if any questians. Ray Moiseed Senivr Environmental Planner VTA {4a�� 3zz-s�s4 Roy.mo Iseed C�vta.org Lett A4 cont. S'1�A1'E:OF CA�EQEl�v'B,�'A3,��G�R�+i1A STATETKAttiSP[]RTATION AGENCY EDMllND G 6R6WN h.Gnvernar DEPARTMEhT�F T17A�iSPnRTATI�IV - l 11 GTtAIE'0 AV�NUE P.O.g03t?3660 DA1Cf..ANp.CA 94G2]-�G6Q P�IQIVE [S1�]285-5900 FH]{ {5lfl)Z86-54�3 8 erne bycffcrenr! 'r'i'Y 7 i I www.dot.�a.gov ��>>y 22, �o�.� scr��so�c�� SCLJ28UIPM 8.38 5CH# 241 i082USS Ms. Piu Ghosh Planning �i�ision City of Cupertino ]�3��Torre Avenue Cupertin�, CA 95(�I4 �ear Ms. Ghosh, Appfe Campus�—Draft E��ironmental Impact Report Thank you for in�luding ti�e California Department of Transportation {�altrans) in the environmental re�iew process fc�r the praject referenced above. We f�a�e re�iewed the Draf't 2 Environmeatal Impa�t Report[DE1R) and [he appended Traf�ic Innpact Ana]ysis {TIA) and have Cont. the followin�cQZZ�ments to offer. Tru,f,fic Impact Analysis��TA} F�igure 8 of t��e TIP►assigns f�a af the praject-generated trips to the Lawrence Expressway.We thin�C that this �alue may have been d�ri�ed in error, potenti�ly due to an assumption that rhe existing travel patierns wifl be mainEained far employees tra�eling tv the Infini[e Loop Campus 3 or o[her Apple office locatians furfher to the west. We anticipate a higher number of trips will use Lawrence Expressway to access US Highway IQ1 as an aleernate tv State Route 85 {5R 85} as a narti�IsQUth conne�tar. We would therefore expect ta sre a carresponding worsening of the Level of 5ervice [LDS) alang this carridar, The TLA did nat treat all study sections eguatly ir� the way some lacations were studied nr represented and same signifi�antly impacted intersections da nflt include the same le�el of detail. For t�ze l+�orthbound�N$) Interstate 280(I-280}Il,awrence Expresswayl5ter�ens Creek oflf ratnp and at the 5nuttsbound (SS}I-2$UISte�ens Creek Bl�d off-ramp, it appears that the raznp 4 intersertion was analyxed bu� ramp queuing was not.We re��sest ta recei�e an aff-rarnp queuing anaiysis ai the I�iS f-2$D1Lawren�e ExpresswaylSte�ens Creek off-ramg and at the SB I- 28�IStevens Creek BI�d aff-ramp to iharaug�fy assess the impacts from ti�e proposed deveIapment and any warranted mitigatinn xneasures. "Culrr•urrs imprares vrmbifiry acrrAS,s Cal+f�rniu" Lett A4 cont. Yel��c�e T'rip Reduction We suppart the ap�l�cant's propasai to impferr�ent Travel Demand Management (TDM}paiicies to reduce traffic impac[s to the 5tate Hig�way System and encourage usage of nearhy�uhli� transit tines.With that in rxund, amang the new or expanded "Project TDM Measures"that are lzstec!vn.�age 75 and?6 c��the TIA are d nurnher af ineffectiv�measures.Fnr example; + Electric �ehicie charging spaces wi[1 nai, in and of itself, limit th�number of vehicular trips to and from [he site. • Tt�e expanded biice-sharing pragrain appears to faGilitate tra�el withu� the prnject�ite and ha�e little or no hene�t to the tra�eling puk��ic. • The measur�titled"Carnpus walkinglcycling cammutes" dQes nai lis[any service, impro�ement,or incenti�e to"priaritixe" walking and cycling Eo t�e si[e. 5 The sectiQn immediately following the"Proje�t TDM Measures" lists additiorsal rneas�res thai may be implemente� if the single-ocrupancy �ehicle mode sh�tr� target is not met. The additianal c�r a�Eernate measu�es appear ta ha�e a hi�her li[ceaih�aod ot reducing the number of single occapancy �ehicle cornm�te trips. We reconamend that the City refer to"Reforming Parking Palicies t❑ 5uppart 5mart GrQwth,"an Iv�T� study funded by Cal[rans for sample parking ratias and strategies that suppart smart growth and Transit Oriented De�elopmeni" (T�D). Alth�augh [he praje�t already prn�oses a reductian in parking from the City pf Cupertino's M�nicipal Code, reducing parking e�en fur�her will er��aurage alternate modes vf transpar[ation,reduce�eh�cle miles traveied and alle�iate fuEure tratfic.inrtpacts an the 5caie highways. Tra�c Irnpact Miligation The projected trig generation and the resulting traftie conditians from [he praposed prr�,}ect are expected tn increase gueues at six freeway an-ramps during ramp metering hours ancf resuit in poter�tially signif'scant impacts.The�dditinnal traffic demand is expected to impede traffic fiow on la�al streets and exceed a�ailabFe storage at ar an the foll�wing freeway ramps: « NS I-28�(I-2g0}Wolfe Raad diagonal on-ramp a NB I-2$Q De Anxa Saule�ard [a1�d}diagona] on-ramp • SB I-ZSQ W�lfe Road laQ�Qn-ramp • SB I-2$Q Lawrence Expressway diagonal an-ramp 6 • 1VB 5R$5 Homestead Raad Iaop on-ramp . 5E SR 85 I]e An�a Bi�d diagonal on-rarr►p We request tizat the appliGant�ro�ide additianat starage f'Qr the freeway an-ramps, local sEreets, vr both to a�oid creating signi�cani impacts to transpartation.We alsa request that the appli�ant pro�ide High Dc�upancy Vehicie(HDV} prcferential �anes at the on ramps as part of the project mit�gation. Please candition the agpra�al of the praje�t upon the satisfactary�ampletian af the const�•ucted nu[igali�u. Caltrans has existing Traf�c Dgerations Systems(T�S} and rarxsp metering eguipment al�ng I- 28D and SR 85 and we ha�e plans ica install additional T�5 and rarnp metering er}uipment along these routes in the near fvture.This equipment must�e maintained and r�main operatiana� ] "Culrrans rsrprrn�es mn6rlir�•ncrriss Cafifnrrriu" Lett A4 cont. during alt phases af the praject. If project mitigat"sa�construction will impact the operation of � tI�ese systems, the impr�vem.ent plar�s mEist specify how the irrs�act[s} wi11 be remedied as part of the encraachment permii or other Caltrans approval. Cont. T7�e proposed mitiga[ian t�widen the S� I-28QIWoife Road off-rarrap to two-lanes does not fulZy mitigate ttus de�elo�m�nt's impacts as queuing from this off-ramp intersection is still�xpect�d ta exceed capacity and ha�e signifi�ant remaining im�ac�s ta the Freeway mainiine. Additsanal storage will need to be added to this ra�np to�nr�[ain ckie queuing on the vff-ramp- If it is nvt g possibl�to pro�ide additional storage due to right oF way constraints, we request that ottrer sneasures be impletnented.Dne such passibility wuuld be ta pra�i��aff-ramg queue detection at the off-ramp gare and a�aardinated trafFic signal preemptian, which would give ramp intersection signal priority ta exiting freeway traffic. The pr�pflsed pra,}ect is ex�ected ta ha�e sigr�ifi�ant imp��ts tfl nine segmen[s (analyced in the Tra#'fic Impact Analysis} arsd�ne H�V lane on I-280,hawe�er. no mitigatian ha�been proposed ��ditectly mitigat�th�se irnpa�ts. We request tt�at the Gity wvrk with Caltrans, Santa Clara Valiey Transpartation Authority{VTA}and any c�ther tespor�si6le agencies,outsida the purview 9 of this prpje�t apprQVal and en�irflnmental assessment pracess,to initiate a project extending the H�V lane on SB I-28(3 from Magdalena A�enue to Ei Monte 12oad. Extending the H�V lane wou2d eliminate a"bottlene�k" at this lacaiion and impra�e tra�el time far high-occupan�y vehicles. Mitigation Measure TRANS-z2 identifies a sum of$53b,UDD as a fair share contributian for(t) t1�e SR 85 Expres;s Lane Project ta��n�ert tFxe existing HdV lane to a toll lane for single- o��upant vehicles between Mountain View and San 1ase,and (2}the Bus Aapid Transit 5tation ❑n Ste�ens Creek Boule�ard a#Wolfe Road and De Anxa Saulevard.These mitigatinn measures are noE expecEed tn reduce project-aenerated traffic impacts t� the 5tate Highway Systerrz Ev less- 10 than-significant le�ets,however, irngrc�ved tra�el vptions wfthin these corrid�rs are ex�ected to resuit in marginally better conditions.T�ensure that the fair share formula pro�ides fur�ds for SR 85 and I-28�proportional ta the project's impau;ts.we would like ta x'e�iew the fair share GaiGUlation, including the trafftc �otumes and cost estimate inputs. Se�eral Transportation and Circuiation impacts descrihed in tne TIA and the Dra�i EIR (TRANS-1, TRANS-3, TRANS-5,etc)decEare [hat, be�ause the mitigation is Qutside the surisdiction of the City of Cupertino,neit�er the City nor the pro�eGt sgansar could ensure the impl�mentatian�f the proposed mitigation measure,thus the irnpa�t would be signi�icant and unavoidable. We da nai cor�cur witia this finding. The Sfate arii�ely participates as a resgonsible 11 agenGy under CEQA and endea�ors tn mairitain the State �iig�iway Systezn in accardance with vperationai standards and ir�a state af good regair_ Presupposing that project mitigatians in�ol�ing other transportation jurisdictians would nat he allowed or cauld nat be implemented is unfounded and should not 6e used �s a justificatiors to a�oid mitigating pr�ject imgacEs. Aesthetics Wh;le the pra}ect descrsptio�inc�udes amp�e infarmation abaut the redevel�pment af existing business parks(incIuding the relocdtion of an historic barn)and t�e extent of the proposed landscaging far the prnject,the DEIR does not dis�lose any aestheti� impacts. We are cvncerned 12 that the Za�k�f discussion for aesthetic inrzpacts may be prabfematic for implementatinn af "Cuf7runs rrnpm�'es��:ubrfiry acrn.sf Califnrnia" Lett A4 cont. certai�project features. Please e�s�re tt�at[he DEIR has fully disclosed any potential fnr I 12 aesthetic impacts to occur as a resuIl of the praposed praje�t. Cont. Nvise Any prQposal to canstruct a sound wall within the 5tate R�W will need ta be accornpanied with an e�aluation in an environmental assessment. We highly recammend that any sound wal[s 13 constri.��ted far this project be p]aced outside a�t�te State right of way,on the applicant's propercY- Right of Wuy Apple will need to transfer any R�W acquired far mitigatian canstructivn ❑n t[�e State Highway System to the State at the cvmpletion af the project. Caltrans will nat accept any new facilities 14 unti] they ha�e been certified tu he ":n accordance with 5tate requirements.Apple wiil rernain respvnsi�le unti] the project is completely closed. Encroachme�tt�ermit Any work within tl�e State right of way,including ramp widening and metering light modificatsons, wi�J be subject[o Caltrans appro�al and must be�onsistent w�th Statz siandards. The apgro�al process widl be detenrr�ined hy the cost and cvmplexity af the work propased within the State rig�t Qf way, Genera�ly, far�onstru�tian casts Iess ihars ane millian dollal•s{�1 million}, the standard en�.roachment permit pro�ess Gan be used. Work with�osts betwecn$1 million and $3 millian typically require a Permit Engineer's E�aluation Repart[PEER], Constnsction costs o�er$3 rr��lion will reqUire the preparatian of a Proj�ct Initiatior� Document(PID} in order ta abiain Caltrans apgro�al. Soth [he PEER and the PID processes ha�e langer tsme frames than the standard en�roachment permst process. In order lo�nnsrruct pro�ect rrutigation on State Rautes 15 �y opening day in 2415, a PID appravaI wouId need to be expedited.T�initiate a PID, please contact Santa Clara Va�ley Transpartati�n Autt�aricy[VTA} and request that your praject be placed on the PID Priarity list. To apply for an en�roachment permit, a compl�ted application, en�ironmental do�umentation, and fi�e[Sj sets vf plans clearly inciicating Stste RflW niust be submitted ta the follnwing address: ]]a�id Sallada_y, ❑istrict Office Chief,�ffice af f'ermits, California�egartment Qf Transportation, District 4, P.O. Bax 23b6�, Dakland, CA 94b23-05fia. 5ee the website li�ked belaw for more informatior►: �http:llwww.dot.ca.gnvlhqltraffapslde�elogservlpermits�. St�ould you ha�e any questions regarding this letter, please cantact Jesse Ra}aertscrn af my siaff at 51�-286-5535 ar cjesse_robertson@dQt.ca.ga�v�. 5incerely, ERIK ALM,A,ICP District Branch Chi�f Lvcal De�elaprr3eni -Int�rgo�er�mental Re�iew �: S�att Morgan,State Clearinghouse Timm Horden,City of Cupertino Da�id StilIman,City of Cugertinq Rob Swierk,5anta Clara Valley Ttansportativn Authvrity{VTA) Roy i�folseed,VTA Eugene Maeda,VTA �awn Cameron,5anta�lara Cvunty Roads and Airports Department Lett A5 Letterl� 5a0154 Name Andrew Crabtree Address 204�ast 5anta Clara 5t,3rd Floor Tower City,State Zip San Jase,CA 95113 Ema i I and rew.crabtree@sanjaseca.go� Suhject Apple Campus 2 DEIR Comment July 22, 2�13 Deparfinent of Community Development Planning Division 1030D Torre A�enue Cupertino,CA 95D14 SUBJECT:Apple Campus 2�EIR �City af 5an Jase File DA13-005} The Gity of 5an Jose appreciates the opportunity to review and pro�ide comments on the propased project. Please consider the Fallowing in relation to the project review in�luding 1 CEDA analysis: Transpartation and Circulation �he project dEl�i identifies four significant una�oidable impa�ts at GMP interse�tions {Wolfell-284, StevenslCalvert,5te�ens CreeklLawren�e, Lawrencell-28�}for ba�kground plus praject and�umulative conditions. In addition,the DEIR identifies a significant unavoidable curnulative impact at ne AnzalSEevens Creek.These five unmitigated impacts will result in non-�onformance to the CMP standa�d and will require pre�aration ❑f a Oeficiency Plan according to the CMP statue and guidelines priar to approval af the 2 praposed project. Both 5an Jose and Sunnyvale have prepared�eficien�y Plans according ta CMP statue for non-cor�forman�e in their jurisdictions that include impact fee pravisions.As a member agency of the�MP project,the City of Cupertino should prepare a regional deficiency Plan in coordination with adjacent member agen�ies.The Qeficiency Plan should address how projects within the City of Cupertino will pariicipate in regional transportation improvements on a fair-share basis. The project proposes to significantly reduce traffic impacts through an"aggressi�e" transpQrtation demand management plan ta 34°/,reductian in peak hour vehicle trips}af which 5an Jose is�ery supportive.San Jose has an adopted goal of reducing vehicks miles tra�elled by 40°Io in our Envision 5an Jose 2040 General Plan. ❑ue to the multi- jurisdictianal nature of the I-28a1S1evens Creek corridor, review and approval of the T[�M pragram for the Apple II Campus should invaE�e adjacen#jurisdictians, including the City of 5an Jose. Preferably, the TpM should be included in the Qeficiency Plan monitored and enforced by the CMP.Compliance with the TQM plan shouid also be subject ta 3 annual monitoring by Valley Transportation Authority{VTAy and subject ta an appropriately set financial penalty fQr non-complian�e with any fine revenues applied to reglonal transpartatian impro�ements.The T�M plan includes a nstwork of employee shuttles.The shuttle plan should be coordinated wi#h the VTA and with neighbaring jurisdictions and include shuttle stops at populatian centers{e.g., ❑awntawn, North San Jose, Evergreen and Almaden Valley}and at regianal transit hubs liite the Diridon 5tation and the Berryessa�ART station{opening in��17}, The proposed penaity of$5ltriplday for not achieving T�M goals is too law to be effective in enforcing the TDM goals in re€ationship to the size of the project (e.g., if the project exceeds ihe target by 2aa trips,the proposeci penaity amount af$ta�0ldaily will not 4 function as an eifective measure ta enfarce TQM targets for an aifice of the profe�t size}. The project should be conditioned to have a penalty of$15fllday or higher to effe�tively Lett A5 cont. deter overage of trips or o�er intensification of emplayees.Because the traffic impacts identified in the �EIR are largely�n regional fa�i[ities for facilities within neighbaring 4 jurisdictions,revenues colle�ted from T�M penalties should a�ply toward regianal C011t. irnprovements identified in the regional �eficiency Plan or Corridor Management Plan. The proposed mitigation of adding an exclusi�e eastbound right-turn lane at Stevens CreeklCalvert will reduce the sidewalk width to 5 feet,which is does not mee[City af San Jose standards{City of San Jose's Leve[at 5ervice Policy, Council Policy 5-3}and could 5 create a secondary impacts to pedestrians.The design of the proposed mitigaEion should maintain a minimum sidewalk width af at least 1 Q feet. Bioiogical Resources: Bay Checkerspot Butterfly 1 Nitrogen �eposition The City of 5an Jase has recently adopted the 5anta Clara Valley Habitat PIanlNatural Communities Canservation Plan (SCVHP}de�eloped in partnership with the Coun#y of 5anta Clara, the City of Morgan Hill, the City of Gilroy, the Valley Transportation Agency and the Santa Clara Valley Water�istrict.The SCVHP establishes a framework for deve3opment praje�ts[o�omply with several state and federal regulatary processes and standardized avoidance, minimization,mitigation and compensation requirements set forth ir�federal and state laws, including the California Enviranmental Quality Act �CEQA}.CEQA requires that any�ublic agency approving or carrying aut a project for which there is subsfantial e�idence of a potentially signifi�ant impact must identify rr�easures necessary to mitigate im�acts ta a less-than-signiticant le�el {Pub. Res. Cade §21Q8�), The SCVHP establishes standardized,equitable,feasible and enforceabfe measures by which participating jurisdi�tions�an mitigate impac#s upon spe�ies covered by the SGVHP to a less-than-significant le�el.The impact and mitigation analyses in the SCVFiP are based on extensi�e analysis and the best avaiiable science and have resulted in the identificatian and design flf feasible rr�itigation that may not ha�e been identified in prior environmental documents.The S�VHP establishes standards for mitigation of impacts to se�eral species that depend on serpeniine soils,such as the Bay Checkerspot butterfly. Potentially significant impacts to such species include indirect,cumulative,and hlghly dispersed impa�ts such as nitrogen deposition. In the past, the effects Qf nitrogen deposition on specia[-status plants and wildl€fe have been underestimated ar were not ur�derstoad;hawever,Fhis is no langer true,and nitrogen impacts are arliculated in detai[ 6 in the SCVHP. Nitrogen depasition is known ta have de3eterious effects on many of the serpentine plants in the SCVHP area,as well as the host plants that support the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly. Nonpoint sources such as automabiles emit nitrogen compounds into the air. 6ecause serpentine soils tend to be nutrient poor, and nitrogen deposition artificially fertilizes serpentine soils, nitragen deposition facilitates the spread of invasive plant spe�ies. Non- nati�e annua!grasses grow rapidly,enabling them to out-�ompete serpentine spe�ies. The displacement of these spe�ies, and subsequent de�line of the several federally-listed species, including the�utterfly and its larval host plants, has been documented on Coyote Ridge in central 5anta Clara Caunty{the last remaining papulation of butterflies}. Nitrogen tends to be efficiently recycled by the plants and micro�es in infertile soils such as#hose deri�ed from serpentines, so thaE{ertilizatian impacts could persist for years and result in cumulative hat7itat degradation.The in�asion of native grasslands by in�asive andlor non-native spe�ies is naw recognized as ane af the majar�auses of the decline of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly. Afi majar remaining papulatians af the�utterfly and many af the sensitive serpentine plant papulations occur in areas subject to air polluFian from vehicle exhaust and other sour�es throughout the Bay Area in�luding frflm within your jurisdiction.Therefore,even relatively small amounts of increased ni#rogen deposition resuftir�g from new deve�opment�ould�ontribute to a cumulatively significant impact by diminishing the population sizes af serpentine species and possibly the chances of survi�al of the threatened butter#ly and the serpentine-specific plant species within 5anta Glara Gounty. Because GEQA requires implementation of all feasib�e mitigation measures, e�en#or impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less-thar�-significant level,including cumulatively Lett A5 cont. significant impacts,and the mi#igation program developed far the SCVHP includes feasible mitigation measures for the impa�ts of nitrogen deposition upQn serpentine habitat and the Bay Checkerspot 8utterfly, similar feasible mitigation should he de�eloped and included for the subject project,correlated to the amount at new�ehicle trips that the prflje�t is expected ta generate.Given the de�elopment af feasible 6 mitigation measures for the SCVHP.it will likely be difficult far a lead agency ta adapt a Statement of Overriding Considerations if no similar mitigation measures are C011t. in�orporated in the projeci. City af San Jose staff understands that the project includes a contribuFian tQward measures intended to provide long-term protection for#he Bay Checkerspot Butterfly and requests clarification that this contri6ution is intended to provide mitigation for an identified significant impact. Population, Emplayment and F{ousing&Greenhouse Gas Emissions and 5ustainability The DEIR indi�ates that the proposed praject would exacerbate Cupertino's existing jDhslhDusing bafance by further con�entrating jobs�t lacations not praximate to htiusing, 7 services ar major transit facilities. Please provide more detaii on how the City af Cupertino is planning land uses ta minimize future auto-dependency and greenhouse gas emissions. 7hank you for providing the City of San Jose with the oppartunity ta comment on the Apple Campus 2�EIR. If you have questions,please contact me at{408}535-7893 ar by g email at andrew.crabtree@sanjoseca.gav or John Qavidson at�408} 535-7895 or by email at jahn.davidson�7sanjoseca.ga�. 5incerely, Andrew Crabtree Qivision Manager Lett A6 Letterl0 500148 Name Payal Bhagat Address 15�0 Warburton A�e City,State�ip 5anta Clara, CA 95�5� Email P6hagat@santacfara�a.go� Suhject City of Santa Clara's Comments on Apple Campus 2 Project �EIR Comment .]uly 19, 2093 Ms. Piu Gosh Project P�anner Cammunity Oe�elopment�epartment City of Cupertin❑ 1q3q�Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95Q14 Re: Comments on the Apple Campus 2 Project�raft En�ironmental Impact Report Dear Ms. Gosh� Thank you far including the Ci#y of 5anta Clara�Ciry}in the re�iew of the Draft Environmen#al Impact Report{DE1�2}for the Apple Campus 2 Proje�#.We appreciate you responding to tY�e comments the City had provided during the�EIR Scoping Session for 1 the abo�e Project. Further we appre�iate the oppvrtunity to meet with Cupertino Staff and the consultant on two occasions ta dis�uss the DEIR. Regarding the ❑EIR,we have the fAllowing�amments: The City would like thank the Project applicant for the commitmsnt of pro�iding fi�e years af annual traffic monitoring following the occupancy of the projecf for a f�e year 2 period,as well as$�SO,O�fl to the Cify of Santa Clara for mitigating any future parking intrusion or neighborhaod�ut-through traffi�in the Westwood Oaks neighborhaod; While the Project will cantribute$536,000 towards two planned transportation prajects identified in VTA's Valley Transportation Plan 2�35, that would improve tra�c operations on (wo parallel facili#ies 1)SR 85 Express Lane Project, and 2}Bus Rapid Transit 5tatian 3 {BRT7 on Stevens Creek 6oule�ard at Wolfe Road and �e Anza Boule�ard, at this time the City of 5anta Clara has not cammitted to the implementation of BRT on our�or#ian of Stevens Creek Baulevard; The City would like to thank the Project applir.ant for cammitting to fully mitigate all impacts found in the QEIR analysis. However, sin�e some mitigation measures identified in the �EIR also contain 5tafemenfs of�verriding Considerations. 5anta Clara is reguesting assurance that the mitigation measures identified will be implemented and the impacts will 4 be made to be less than significant.This may�e achie�ed through adaption of a Mifigation Monitaring and Reporting Program, inclusion of the mitiga#iars measures in the P�oject's Conditions o�Approval,or a financial commitment to constru�tian of the imp�avements; The ❑Ef R language should be amended ta clearly identify di�erted tr�ps due to the closure of Pruneridge Avenue west af Tantau Way. Those trips shauld he accounted for in the Traf#ic Impact Analysis[TIA]showing how traff�c that currently uses westbouncf 5 Pruneridge ta access Interstate 280 at Woife Road will he diverted and the same for the reverse. The TIA should also show how traffi�sntering and leaving the residential neighborhood in 5anta Clara adjacent to the Projec#site will circulate; and Lett A6 cont. There is an existing three-ton vehi�ular weight�imit prohi�itian a� Pruneridge Avenue hetween Lawrence�xpressway and City of 5anta Clara haundary. Please er�sure that 6 traf#ic assQ�iated wiih the prnpased Praject is not routed in a way that violates this restriction. Again,thank you for including City of Santa Clara in the review of the Draft Environmental impacf Report��EIRy fflr the Rpple�Camp�s 2 Project. Shouicf yasa�a�e any questians 7 regarding the camments pravfded ak�o�e, please�ontact Payaf Eihagat, at 40$-615-2458[�� or PB}�agat@santa�laraca.gov. We laok forward to working wi#h tha Project applicant in can�unctivn with th�Ci#y of Cup�rtinv in the future. Sincerely, Ke�in RiEey pirector of Pianrring cc:Julio�uenies,City Manger Rajeev Batra, director of Puhllic WarkslCify Engineer �ennis Ng,Traf��c Engineer Lett A7 From: Lafebre. Hilda [mailto:lafehreh@samtrans.cam] Sent: Monday, �uly 22, 2Q13 3:37 PM To: City of Cupertin❑ Planning Dept. Cc: Lee, Marian; Petty, Sebastian; Fisher, Steven {Steven.Fisher@VTA.OR�} 5ubject: Apple Campus Z-DEIR_]PB Camments Pi u, Please find attached the Peninsufa CQrridorJoint Powers Baard {JPBj eomments to the Appfe Campus Z Draft Environmental Irr�pact Report tDEIR�, A hard capy of this ketter will be sent through 1 regular mai1.1PB staff is looking fa�ward Co worfcing wiCh the City of Cupertina and Apple in this important project. Regard5, Hilda Hilda �afebre, ❑BIA Manager,Capital Pro�ect &En�ironmenta! �lanning Caltrair� I SamTrans I Transpartation Authority Phane: 55�-522-7842 I Celi: 650-2a8-4376 laf b e a tra s.c❑ `�plrasc cvnsid�r t3te cn�irvnmc��l�cl�r��rinlin�lliis�-mai] Lett A7 cont. ��az;,�JF G�W�-•�•�=s�r,�s iCEH YFi��E?�Char+i TOI,A NOLFk.VICE C,NAiR Cal� . J��s��R� MaLW GC�HEN JEARV OE7.L AS4 F�4LR� ARTkIJR L.LLOYO AGR I EN4E TISSiER PERRY W�qpWl,RD MICNA�'.J,$C,SH[ON �r EC�TnIE I?1R ECiOR a��iy�?.ryn�� 1s. �'iu c,�i�i5l, f'lansiii��T]�pz�t�tn�eltt C'it�•s�f Cuper[ir7o I[}3SO forre Av�nne C'u��erlino.CA RSd I� Fte: A�ple Cam�us 2-T]ratl F_IR_ .iPR C't��itittenis T3e:ir 1�is.Gli�sh. The Peaiinsula Corri$��r Jnint!'aGVers B[�arci{,1PT3}is pleased[c�sitl�rnit�onuttients in[h� ❑raft [�.nvirnnmetit�l [ii�par! Rep.7s't([:�R} f'ortlte prc�p�seJ Ap�leC'amgus? d��eloprne�t[.Tltc JP13 sipplaiitls [Itc 4nu1 nf�t'�dttci�l+��ehir.ular•trips ln llte/l�ple Ca»ipi�s?sile and fouks fon�ard tn��c�r•kiri€�vrth bu!!� AE��Ic arz�i tii�L�it} nf�.upe3-tisi�,tn c�isure Ih�it tlle C'.altCain systent Can ��lr�y a r�zle isi suppui7in�A��7t�'� nn��niit��aird fulure'1'f]M cffrfris .1Pi3 st.tff is cD�t��rized.Ijow��r,iltiat u•ansiF�tE18IVSis included in tije 1)raF't E!R dncti n�t siifFicientl} i�ocisittent c�istin�ca�acstt c��iSStrainls I=i�zi1��•Caltrain, riar e�oes il�uanii�G �iLhLr the�iu•rent c�r �utential Iutuir use nf C'altrain ser�iees l�y Apple ez�iplt�yeis. C;iven bi�tli ilie aly5enc�czl�c{ua�it�fied rn�llysi�and tl7e refer��zers tn C'aliraiil ststi'ic<s aitid �a�iliti�ti in lliti�aticin'11t�isurc C r.ins913.['�iltraiii �ann�� vcriFy shc a�eurac� i�l tiie Ic�lln�vitt�stai4menl' ..I'!ie prnjeel r�iu�1 irrrti��rj��+fe�et 1i11ra7�G cl.srg�rrJirunr r�ii�,�,tv r�rr rirA��r r�u�r.�rr JzrrilNir., crirrl.�c•rrire°,, ri�rh 2 u.r C'erTlrc�rrr. .tir�rc•��11�c�ur��rr+j�u��c!prr�jc�c•1-�'elerrcd�'rcic+•.�Iiij7 tirr��rlcl l�c lmt�.��t!�lir rli.sr�rri<<� l�f��tt�r��r r11�� ruj�c�t,�r1[°u�r�!llause r�•u,�.tiir�crcilrfie.� r,+rclu►ii�cly 1ai�l�. . �P.�!?t� 11�liilc Ikie ahove cnitcltlsiv�i ma)� indced he�urz•rct,ih�.i['ki htlit�'ey ttiat tlie I)k=1f2 il��iti t�ot �}:•�yat! suf'firieiit anaiysis tn sappoR s�zch a statement. Ir�re�ien�in��he Apple C'ain�us'_' Uraf�t CiR,Ca�t�•ain:w�c;tliai Miii�ati��1 yl�a�we f ranss�f3 i'1 i]119 Program Etf�a:�sianl incl►ides buth the expansinn of�.�p��le 5huttle ser��ices to Caltrain slatinns�n�! Ihc potisible:purchase.nFuni��ersal transit�aasses tpntentiall�� in4�udisig Caltrain Go Passes}fc�r A4��Ic �mpinyees. I3ee�use of`the icientifirat'snn nfCaltrAiei serGi�eS anci fa�ilities i�i Mitigation 11Rea�ur�: franti�7f3 a�id the averall sl<<fec3 gaal vl`tlse cxp�anded Tf]N] �rn�ram tn in�rcas�irac�sit usa��e amc�ii�.�ppfe"� em��lnye4s.Caln�aici helie��es I'lsrth�r��n�tlysis is��un•cui�e�l anci til��uld hc reFIe�teii i�i [li� E�i=�ai Fi�t. 1 P�NINSULA CDRRIaDR.1�lNT P�WERS BDARQ �25A 5an Carlos A�e.—P.Q. Box 30�6 San Carlos,CA 94�Tfl-13�6 65D.5D8.62fi9 Lett A7 cont. �'he infnrmatint3 i�iclud�ci 1�eIrn�,pru�iiics il�t�i�7n C'aItraiiz ser►ires�iid liirlher dnL�ii�ients Callr:iin's �pc�ific��,ncrrr�s. Calrrai��Caraciry Corrstrair�ts Ali�ia«gh the��R idt:iliti�s C"alrrain as{�an��f the"TDM and as a transit pro�ide�•pflternialh str�in�sht pro;�osed develop»�ent site, it omits Caltrair�from tize p�al: Ic?ad talcailatians on �a�e 3t� 1i�ci dc?�s nr,� c�then��isc evaEuate Caltrain's capaciry to�bsor�i ne�v tri�s. Caft�'ain is ciirrentl} experic�irin�iii�rease� ri�icr•.I�i�and lias li:nst�ci a�•c�il�iblc�ap�3rit� ��i�mnm pcHk ItiQin�trains.C'altrain�alcul�tes eapacit�•c�i�str�ints I�y analy�in�tile maximui:i loatl point t�feaclf train rtilati��e to the civera�c GtiU�otal seats a►+aila�le��n eac3�train, Data col�ectecl�urin�amtual passe�iger c��imts{cviiducted ii: Fchriia�7 nf 2D I�1 indic3tr�i tlie !'nllo��•iiig peak ctip�jcities F��r traiiis dep�rtin�their nri�in dtiriiz�the C;D(iarii to 9:4f�am peflk[�epttr�led 6y ser�•i��t�p�and�iircctin:i}. :�r•cra�c :1N Ycak Lna�i Paclur 1��•5��-�ic�T�'�e: G:�1[1�isr�to 9:U[lant Sc�vice Tti• c 5autlihound Nartl�bonttd � Limited 7�riiizs i1.�11 U.CiR � 1=.xpress frainti {gst�� F3ullet] [].77-- r_�.�}:, i C'altrain bclicvcs ili�ah�� Ir,ad tact�7r5�lii�ulci lae d��cunic»trd nn p��fi�ali>>z��.��ith th�c;3��til��ti.iii5 2 ��resented far VT'�A's tr�nsit services. C011t. ['se v�Callrain If3'Applc F:naplu�'ces At vac intiis��ii�ts, tlze f]!�f k cicscrihes r-1p�le trasisit �hi�tti�services,V'I�A�'��u�es_:�iisi hi�}��Iti I:ac;ilitieti a� cnnnectine.hntlz Ap�le's existing tacilitG ni��tltic Laizzru��' ,ite with C.allrain statinns in Mau�itai�i Vit�ti. 5unn}�v�1e.5aizt�t Ci�ra�tnd 5an Jusc. 1[o�4•ever.the aiiall�sis d�zes n��t qisaiitif� tlie siiare nf Apple Lrnpl�yees curre�itly usin�[:altrain. 5i�i3ilarly.Ifie 17EIR ideniifies shutti�ser�itie artid hi�yclz ne[��ork mitigati��r�s titar��ill lead tn an i�T�pr��ved cnr�siectinn 6et��i�t�ie t ampus 2 site aiid Caltrain's stations. hut again dnes izat quantiFy r9�c antic's��ated chan�e in CaEtrain s�idership(nr 3:ialy�e rhe impsct e�f�his cl�ange on Caltrain's�apa��tyy. To assess 1hi efte�tivestesti�rsd feasiUil�i� ul�tl��sr i�iiti`�i1tiC1115,{,'ill1;'�3111 t�elie��es t33at tiie fnl�nwing shou2d f�e qtianti�ied ar�d doci�mente�f in the EIR: • Current dail��Caftrain trips h��A�ple e�i3ployo�s • Curre��t daily .4�ple 7'ra:isit Shuttle trips sen�ic��ultrain SEztii�ns f tri��s. scats, treqi:enc� > • I'utuEr dail��Calt�•,3ir1 l¢'i�s��y A�?p!e etnployecs talti:r prc?jeci r�peni�t�and uss�tttiin�� implemeiitation of Niici�ation MGas�ire'I'rans9�3), Analysis af'Caltrain�apacity and use s��'C�9train srrvices��y Ap�le ernpl�Yyees s��ou�d be used to evalirai� An[f lustifv lh�DEiR`s Con�lusi��t� llta[tl�i propased c�evelopment��ill•'ha��e na sig�sifi�a�it impa�t"la C�Itrai»ai�d to verifi�lhe feasiE�ilin of tlie Caltrain related curr7�ior�en[s uf'Miti�atian �easure Trans9B. 2 Lett A7 cont. A�ain, rhe JPB�pprc�iates�he o��actunih�ta cai�ii�icnt o:i this draft ciocitimm and loaks for4var�i tu 2 �4'Z�]'�i[Sl�?l4'il�l lI7C'Clly of C�ipes•tinn acid App;c tQ st�p�ort tl�e reduciic�n of 4•chicle ts-i�s to tl�t�ra�osr�l C011t. .�p�le Cam��uti? sile. Sincerel�. . � _ � � r . . i�i1da Laf'e�rti. DSIA Ma�ta�er.Ca}�ital f'roject& F'.m iro»mcsital Plansiiiig Cc; ,�fariaii L.ee. Executi��[}T�icer Caftraiii Mndernizatian Seb�astian Petty.5cuiar Plas�ner 3 Lett AS Frvm: Molseed,Roy(Roy.Molseed@VTA.�RG� Sent: tvlanday.Je11y 22,2fl13 3 40 PM Tq: Aarli Shrivastava:appkecampus2 Cc: Timrr}Bnrden:Qav�d S��Ilmaa:Gary Chaa;'erik.aim�dpt.ca.gvv';Cameran,�awn;Fis[ow.John:Augenstein,Ghris;Emotu.Casey: Molseed,Ray:Sw�erk.RoGeri Sup)ec[: Apple Campus�Draf!E4R Attachments: ClJ11q2_�pple2_I7EIR_7-22-13.pdf Aarti, Rttached are VTA camments on the Apple Campus 2 �raft EIR and TIA. Ple2se�ontinue t�farward r�otices of a�ailability regarding d�euments for this project to Roh Swierk ar�d myself. 1 Thank you for the fl�portunity to�omment. Piease�onta�t me if any questions. Roy Molseed 5eniar En�iranmental Planner 11�A {�087 3Z1-5784 Rav.molseed@vta.ar� Lett AS cont. � saHre c � aRA � Yalley Transp�rtatian Avthority dufy 22,20I3 City of Cupertino Dcpartment of�nmmunity De�elapment 1�3a0 Tnr�e A�enue Cupertino, CaIifon�ia 950I� Attention: Aarti Shri�asta�a,Community De�elopment Director Subject: ❑rafl E]R and TfA far Apple Campus 2 Dear Ms. Shri�asta�a: 1'he 5anta Ctara Valley Transportation Authority(VTA}has re�iewed the Drat�En�ironmental Impact Repoi�t(DEIR}and Transpartation Impa�t Analysis [TiAj for the App�e C'ampus 2 Project. We ha�e a number Qf comments tin these documents,which are included below. HQwe�er, 1 would like to hi�hli�ht here se�era] key themes from our review. t�irst,we wnuld like tv commen�the City and th�prnject spansor for mair►tair�ing apen lines of communicatian with V1'A ihroughnut this process,with the result that many of VTA's cvncerns regarding the closure of I'runeridge A�cr�ue,th�rerouting of't��ansit serv�ce and impacfs to bus stops,the treatment of the bicycle and pedestrian network surroundin�the site,and the approach ta impacts ta regional facilities,were already addressec�by the time the DEIR and TIA were released. 1 Se�-ond,we would]ike to commend the City and the proje�#s�ansor for tharoughly analy�ing of COnt. a11 modes af transportatian in the DE[R and T1A and including meaningf'uI mitigation measures ta impro�e pedestrian,bicycle and transit conditions surrounding the site. in addition,the project builds on Apple's already extensi�e Transpartation Demand Managemcnt[TDM}Prvgram with a conimitment to achie�ing a 34%nan-Single accupant Vellic�e (50V}mode share, including a monitoring program with enfprcement.This le�el of�nmmitment to impio�ing conditior�s for alternati�e modes of transpartation and reducing automobile trips is consistent with the gaals af the Santa Clara Cnunty Congestinr�Management Program(�MP]managed by VTA. Based an our re�iew of the DFIR and TTA, we ha�e the tnllowin�comments on ti�e traz3spartat'san analysis: E us Service V7�A xs encouraged to see that Apple will be pro�idin� imprQ�ed,Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)accessible bus staps far VTA ser�ice on 7'antau A�enue and Wolfe Road. ��he bus 2 stop amenities prnvided will impro�c the custamer experien�e for the passen�ers that use these stops. We would like to note that VTA has recently adjusted the Line S1 which ser�es the bus 3331 Ror�fi Firsi Slreei •San Jose, {A 95134•192T •Administrntion 4�8.371.555i •{us�omer Servi�e 4Q8.32].230d Lett AS cont. City of�upertino ]uiy 22,2[]13 Page 2 af 4 stops alang Tantau to alsa serve the Santa Clara Caltrain StatiQn&Transit Center,which will pro�ide�anncGtions��ith Altamont Cammuter Fxpress(ACE)Rai�, Caltrain,and ather VTA bus ser�i�e at that lacatit,n. 1�ar�y of the praposed V"fA bus stop incatians are intended ta be shared with other servi�es,tne 2 bus stop should be designed tn accommfldatc the additional�ehicles and nvt intcrfere with COnt. VTA's buses ser�in�the stap. In addition,it is our understandin�that lLpple wif i maintain the bus stop amenities as part of their other routine maintenancc Qf thc area around the new carripus. VTA laoks forward to exe�utin�an agreement betwcen the City of Cupertino,Apple,and VTA address�ng this issue. Secandary Imp_acts to Bicvcle, Pedestrian and Transit Modes 7'he'I'IA identifies signi�cant impacts to eight inierscctians in the Qackgrounci P�us Project s�enaria,and in these instances,additianaf tuzn danes are proposed as physrca�miti�atian measures for the impacts. The"]'IA also notes that"ln some�ases,mitigating a motor�ehicle traffic impact at a study interseciivj�would resukt in secondary impacts to othcr modes of tra�el (such as a street widening that woisld result in ]nnge�pedestrian distances)"(pg. iv).VTA notes 3 that iz�tersectinn widening can also potentially degrade transit access since the quality af the pcdestrian environment is a key compnr�ent of'trai�sit access. in the TIA and DEIR, cansiderable attention is paid ta conditions ior bicycles and pedestrians araund the project fr�ntage. Howe�er, the TIA and DEIR da not expIicitIy inciude ana�ysis of secoi�dary iriipacts ta non-auto moaes for the aff-site intecsectipns that are propos�d far modifioatians. VTA notes ihat ther� are altcrnati�es ta widenin�intersections when automobile traff c increases. For example,the City of San Jose has a"Prote�ted �ntersection" policy allowing �ertain intersections to execed ihe cstablished i.e�el of Ser�ice tLOS)threshnld when they are near suhstantial transit impro�ements andlor adjacent pri�ate developmeni,or havc reached their p[anned maximum capacity. �vr�'NiP Intersectians, the Mini I]�fciency Plar��rocess is 4 desi�;ncd to allaw lacal agenczes tQ identify nffsetting measures, such as rnultimQdai impra�ements, in cases wher�it is faund infeasible to add capacity to an intersecti�n that falls below the established CMP LDS threshold of E. We encaurage th�City af Cupertino tQ consider ihese or ather altecnati�e appr�aches ta addressing intersection impa�is in lieu af adding ianes ta the intersections. In cases where i�e�ity pursues w�iden�n�inrerse�t�ons as mitigation �'ar a�tQ L�S impacts, V7'�1 wauld like tn see#hc City play clnse attcntion to potential measures to preser�e pedesirian, bicycle and iransit conditions, There are a nusa7ber of sianple,low-�nst measures that cauld be implemented,such as redu�ing auto lane widths, utilizing shaulder right-of-way,and tight�ning 5 curb radii where feasible;pro�iding safety features such as high-�isibility crosswa[ks,pedeslrian refuges,signagc,andlor bicycle pa�ement ma��kings;and others. V'TA w�ould be happy to pro�ide assistance to the City and thc project sponsor in this area as the project progresses. Lett AS cont. City af CUpertino July 22,2d13 Page 3 of 4 �fumber af Si�ni��ant Fntersectian Impa�ts T4�ere is a discrepancy in the TIA belween the number of'si�nificant impacts in Background plus Praject Conditions shown in Table ES-1 {p�. �i)and Table I5 (pg. 85) and similarly, between 6 the number of si�nificant impacts in Cunnulaii�e plus Pr�ject Conditinns shawn in Table ES-3 and Table ]C(p�. 89}. VTA understands that the City is aware ni�this discrepancy and plans to issue a correction in the f�EIR. Freew�Se�ment Analysis and Impacts The TIA indicates that thc praje�.t wnufd result in si�ni�cant impacts to nine mixed-tYow segments of I-28�,one HOV segment oi'I-280,and one mix�d-t�ow segment vf 5R$5. As a mitigalinr�rneasure,the City 11as proposed that the praject sponsor shall pay a$536,000 fair share coniril�utiQn towards the SR$5 Express Lancs project and the Bus Rapid Transit{BRT} statiQn on Ste�ens Creek Saule�ard ai Wolfe Rnad and ❑e Il��za E3ou�evard. The TIA and DEII� � note that these projects are included in VTP 2035 and"impro�=e t��affic operations vf the irr�pacted freeway sc�ments and pra�ide added transportation capacity on parailel facilities." VTA agrees that a contribution ta these projects�anstitutes an appropriate mitigativn measure for the freeway impacts for the reasons cited in the TIA and DEIR. VTA recommends including analysis of t�e frceway segments on I-280 south of Winchester Boule�ard to determine if project trips exceed one percent of the freeway capacity in the AM ar�d PM peak periods fQr both the northhound and snuthbaund directiQns. In addition,the TIA g should include an assessm�ni of at�er freeway segments to determine w}�ether additianal freeway se�ments meet the one percent threshold. Z'his recomn�endation is based on Sec•tinn 2.2.2 Free��ay Segments ot the VTA CMP TIA C�uidelirzes. �reeway Ramp I�npro�ements The TIR identities impro�ements ta the I-�8fllWolfe Road off ramps. VTA appreciates the Ci#y 9 #aking the lead in�oordinating t�is widening proje�t with VTA and�altrans. VTA recommends that the impra�erncnts remain within the existing Caltrans Ri�ht-Of=Way if possible. ueuin Anal �sis at Freewa �n-Ram LocatiQns VTA on the behali'of 15 5anta Clara Caunty lacal agencies has a Memorandum of Understanding(MDU}with Caltrans on haw ramp meters arc rnaintained and operated in Santa Clara Cou3ity. This MOC1 has specific lan�uage that requires queues from ramp metering operations shall not impede the flow�of traffic on Io�al arterials. D«e to this MOU language, 10 VTA requests that the City conduct an analysis of the ramp metering queues at the I-28DIWojfe Road and I-2$41Lawrence�.xpressway int�rcHanges to clearly demonstrate that ihe queues will not impact local streec operations. If these queues do irr�pede the flow of txaffic on the lvcal arterial, it may be necessary to pro��ide mitigations such as pra�iding additional storage lanes ar H�V bypass lanes on these ianpacted ramps,where these are feasible. Lett AS cont. City of Cupertina July 22, 2D13 Page 4 of 4 VTA iooks forward to workin�;with the City of Cupertino and the project spansor to help advan�e this important project. I'lease da not hesitate ta contact lohn Ristow,Chief CMA 11 Dft7�er, at[408)32]-S713 if you ha�e any questions or ta discuss how wc can work together with you in this process. 5incerely, � � r Mi�hae] T. �3urns General Mana�er cc: Timm Borden,City of Cupertino Johr�Ristow�,VTA Da�id Stillman,City of Cupertino Chris Augenstein,V"1�A Gary Chao, City of C'upertino Cas�y Emoto,V�f A �rik Alna,Caltrans District 4 Roy MQlseed,VTA ❑awn Cameron, Santa C'lara County Roa�ls&Air}-rorts Lett 81 Letter ID 500141 Name Corinne Winter Address Sificon ValEey Bicy�ie Coalition, 1922 The Alameda Suite 42Q City,State Zip 5an Jose,CA 95126 Emaif corinne�bikesiliconvalley.org Subject Apple Campus 2 Draft EIR comments Comment Ta Whom It May Cancem: Si[icvn Val€ey Bicycle Caalition [SVBC)is a nonproft arganizat�an with the mission of pramoting�icyc}ing in Santa C�ara and 5an Matea Caunties. Well o�er a year ago, Apple kindly in�ited SVBC to work with them in their planning process for their new research and de�elopment campus in Cupertino. During this process,we have collaborated with Apple,Alta Pianning & Design,and other stakehoEders to provide input on how to make the development bike and pedestrian friendly—both for those working at App1e and for thase traveling through the area.This collaboration was particularly important to us due ta the per�ei�ed inconvenience af�losing Pruneridge A�enue to bi�yGle and pedestrian traffic{although in fact bi�yGle traffic�olume r,ounts turned aut to be fairly!ow an Pruneridge]. 1 We�eld a series af ineetings with Apple and Alta Pianning&Qesign at�arious points during their pfanning process to giue feedback on their plans.We advertised one of these meetings to our rrsembership to encourage greater engagement fram the bicycling community. As a whole,w� believe that Apple has done an�x�mplary job of incorpflrating aur suggestions to make this part of Cupertino more�iice-friendly. In this letter,we will first mention the many improvements that App1e has committed to make both on-campus and off, and then we will identi4y a few areas for improvernent where we feei that the City has an opportunity. Bicycle Access Improvemenfs The following is an o�erview of the recommended bicycle facilitEes on streets adjacent to the�ampus proposed by Apple that ws strongly support the irr�plementation of. We understand that Apple plans to invest$10M in hike and pedestrian impravemen#s on puhlic s#reets around the campus and near6y, for whi�h we applaud t�e company. Bike Lanes Bike lanes are defined as a portion of the roadway that has heen designated hy striping, signage, and pa�ement markings for the preferentiaf or exclusive use of bicyclists. Sike lanes are recommended on North Wolfe Road, Pruneridge Avenue,and Homestead Road. This section af the corridar includes conventianal�ike lanes where there is not enaugh 2 right-of-way ta include enhanced treatm�nts such as buffered bikeways. 8uffered Bike Lanes A buffered bike lane, a€sa called an enhanced bike lane, is a bike lane that is buffered by a striped "shy aone"hetween the bike fane and the moving vehi�le lane. With the shy zone, the buffered lane affers a more camfortahle riding environment for bicyclists who prefer nat ta ride adjacent to traffic.7his design has a number of Uenefits in�luding: • Provides greater shy distance between rars and bicyciists, allowing for more�omfor#for people on hikes. • Provides space for bicycEists to pass each other. • Provides greater space far the bicycl�tra�el lane withouf making the lane ap�ear so wide Lett 81 cont. that it may be misiaken for car use. •Appeals to no#jusf experienced bicyclists, but people who bicycle on occasion and those �ew to bicycling. Buffered pike lanes are recommended an Narth Tantau A�enue and Vallca Parkway. The recommended buffered�ike lane design is the sarne design as a recently implemented Caltrans buf#ered bikeway on 51oa#Boule�ard in 5an Francisco and is a rrzodified �ersion af the design guidance presen#ed in the NACTD(NatiQnal Association af City Transparta#ian Officials} Urban Sikeway Qesign Guide. Bike 8oxes A hike hox is generally a right angle extension to a bi�Ce lane at the head of a signalized intersection.The bike box allows bicyclists to get to the front af the traffic queue on a red light and proceed first when that signal turns green.The bike �ox can also act as a storage area if heavy bi�ycle traffiG exists.The bike box�an also facilitate left turning movements for hicy�lists who use the'twa stage turn.'Motor vehicles must stop behind the white stop line at the rear Qf the bike box. 6ike boxes should be located at signalized in#ersections only. Bike boxes can be com�ined with intersectian crossing markings(see belaw}for green light situations to remind�ehi�les to be aware of bicyclists. This treatment is not a Caltrans approved tra�c control device, howeaer the City can apply ta Caltrans for appro�al ta experiment—SVBC's Executive Director sits on tfi�e Caltrans statewide Bicycle Advisory Committee{CBACJ as well as the Caltra�s�istrict 4 6icycie Advisary Cflmmittee{a4BAC}and we would be delighted to assist the City in se�uring Cupertino the approval to experiment with this treatrnent. Bike boxes are recQmmended at: 2 -Northbound N Walfe Ave at Pruneridge Ave. Cont. •Westbound Hamestead Rd at N Tan#au Ave. •Westbound Pruneridge Ave at N Tantau Ave. Twp—Stage Turn Baxes Twa-s#age turn hoxes assist bicyclists with making left turns at multE-lane intersections. This treatment is typically ap�lied on multi-[ane streets with f�igh traffi�speeds andlor�alumes. It pro�ides a numher of benefits including- •Impro�es bi�yclist comfort. •Provides formal waiting area for bicyclists making left turns outside of fhe crosswalk. The two-stage turn box is recommended on N. Wolte A�e at Pruneridge A�e. €ntersection Crossing Markings intersectian crossing markings are an extension of the bicycle lane thraugh an interse�tion. 7his bike lane extensian has a number of benefits, in�luding: •Enables bicyclis#s ta �orrectly position thems�l��s fa the lefl of right turn lanes or to the right of left turn lanes. •Reduces conflict between turning rnotorists and bicycle through trafFic. •Provides bicyclists with guidance ta follow the preferred traveG path. -A4erts r�otarists to expect and yield ta merging�i�y�le traffic. Intersection crossing markings are recommended at: -Northhound N Wolfe Ave at Pruneridge Ave. -Northhound N Walfe Ave at Campus Entrance. •Westhound Homestead Rd at N�antau Ave. -Westbound Pruneridge Ave at N 7antau Ave. Green Bike l,anes Through Conflict Areas Green bike lanes through cont3ict areas is the appli�ation of green colaring applied to pavement in�anflict zanes. Benefits af this treatment lnclude: -Alerts roadway users to expect bi�yclists. Lett 81 cont. •Assigns the right of way to bicyclists. •The FHWA[Federal Highway Administration}has provided blanket approval for green �olored pavement and Caltrans has aEso appro�ed this trea#ment. Green bike lanes through �anflict areas are recommended at: •N Wolfe Ave at all 28� ramps. •Norfhbound N Tantau A�e at parking fat entrances and approach to dedicated right turn lane at Hamestead Rd. •N Tantau A�e at the Transit Center enfrancelexit, loading area and parking !ot enfrances. Gampus Bi�ycle Impravements 2 Apple already leads a very successful bike share�ragram in Cupertino and wil]expanding the program with Apple Campus 2. They ha�e committed to a comprehensi�e,integrated, C011t. and muftimada! Transportation pemand Management Program,of which biking is an integral part. Apple currently implements an aggressi�e TOM program with 28°/o employee parti�ipation.Apple has committed to increase the 7[]M program to 3�°Io as part of Apple Campus 2. En addition to�reating linkages and connections to the public bike network,Apple has incorporated on-�ampus�iking as a key feature af the plans. In addition to mare than 1,��0 bikes on campus far empEayees, this also inGludes canvenient bike a�cess points to the campus along with accessibie bi{ce parking and storage, lockers and shower fa�ilities,and integrated on campus bike paf� network and other bike friendly amersities. �pportunities for Additional Improvements The Tantau 28�o�ercrossir�g Bicyclists struggle to find�omfortable and con�enient highway crossings throughout our region.The improvements planned for Wolfe Road wifl be helpful, �ut will stili not provide the aptimum in bicyclist and pedestrian comfort�ecause of the on and aff ramps and the number of confli�t points a bicy�[ist has to navigate.This is an exisffng condition that will be impro�ed by Apple. Due to the lack af conflict areas,Tantau aver Highway�8p prov€des an excellent alternative tha#�an he made�omfortabie for�ike riders af all ages and sKill levels. �n North Tantau, 3 the�urrent plans have one through vehicle lane and a nice�uffered bike lane in either direction. Traveling svuth across 28D, howe�er,the riding expe�fence becomes more limited, as the buffer to the bike Eane disappears and a ser.ond vehicle through lane is added. We do not think that the expected motor vehicie traffic volumes justify this confguration. On the most recent set af bicycEe plans submitted by Appfe,we wauld like to see Cross Section F on page 6 altered ta IQOk more like Cross 5ection E on page 5. Vallr.o Parkway We alsa be�ie�e some improvements caR be made to Vallco Parkway. First,we woufd strongiy ad�ise the use of reverse angle parking—this treatment is n�w considered besf practice for promating the safety af people on bikes, as bicyclists are much more�isible to motoris#s attempting to pull ❑ut af their parking spot. Second,the 5-foot, non-hufFered bike lane is not up ta the same le�el as most of the 4 suggested infrastru�ture in the plan, and,given the diagonal parking and two traffic lanes In either directio�,we would prefer to see a minimum 6 foot bike iane, patentiaEly with a buffer. With 12 and 12.5-fnot lanes,we helieve that there is ample road space ta give cyclists more room. If the lanes have been specifed to he this wide�ecause of frequent hus traffic, that's an e�en better reason ta gi�e bicyclists more room ta maneu�er when caught between buses and mQtarists trying to exit their diagonal parking spot. It appears feasible to remove one or two feet fram the inner through lanes to pro�ide this extra width to fhe bike lanes. in conclusion, we feel ihat Apple has done an excellentjob in incorporafing our thoughts I 5 Lett 81 cont. and cancerns inta#heir design of the hicy�le iacilities surrnundir�g their Campus 2 projec#. and we have just a coupla of remaining suggestions for the City to cansider.We would like to recogniae bath Apple and the City of Cupertina far understanding the impartance of 5 enco�raging travel hy bicycle. cont. Please feef free to call rr�e at 408-806-8582{�with ar�y questians. I w�uld he happy to sit dow�with Cupertino City stafi to discuss our posktion or�the praject at any time. Lett 82 United Serv�ce WorkerS Wes# July 19,2�[3 ■r Mayor Urirs Mahoney dc T�ie Cupertinra City C«tsn�il L"u�rrlino City Hall �� 103(]�]"�'nrce Aveni« Ct�prc�ino,CI195U l� Cnin2�tents re: Applc Car�pus 2 De�elupmenl 5authern Callfornla !-feadquarters Dear iVlayar�Ialiatiey aiid Cnustic.i[me�7zbez�s, 828 W.Wasf�ington BA+tI. �.❑snng�res,cA9po�s Thc Service E�r��c�yees internalirnjal «nias� —t�nitecl Servizc Wni•kers (za3}zs�-��o� t213t284-772Sfauc Wusl (SI:II?-US�VW} Sp�TfC41'c1rC5 IIIC C][7�1OPlilf3t(y t0 CUlI]t7'lGT1l.Dtl 1I115 pz�ujcct. US1�JW repi•esezits r��er�tl,[10U pr��perty ser�icc wnrf�er� tiGrc�ss ❑tangeCounryo�ice tf�c slale nf Calif��i-i1ia, inclu�lin� a iaximatel �S,SC10 securit afiiceA•s. i 20o N.n��r„�� P' ] Y s��c��ao Curren4.ly w�.are party to a fnaslei'cnllectiWe bar�;aining a�recment wit11 SanraMa,�n4z�Qi seve►-al lcic�l and nation��l sigi�alary�mk�]�3yer5. Tl�c tit�ion staridard t7ia�aas-9�oa includes p�'o�isi«ns nz1 �i�irtg wagcs,ac�ess ta izealthc�u'e,paid si�k clays, t7 I 4a 2�5-97]a fiax t�aii�in�„�snd clispirte resrslution ��rnccdures llzal i�ave rGSUltcd in hctte� 5an�7iegv o�ice t��lerstion :int] l�hc�z•pea�e amoiig s'sg�z�tn��ies ancl a i�elter lifc Eor nfficers ��65 Farrma�mrAve. arfc] their Carr�;]ies. 5uEte zGD Sari i7fego,CA 9Z 145 fs19��'�}�3p�n Rising ine�uafity r�:Fnains�i�hr�Ht ta S'slicc�s� Val�ey's pro�pet�itJ'. W�]lIE [6f9i64f-�U5SI2x ��,y hc<<dli�es tell�f a seut�n�l "[uch �c�c�i�i" lit-t.in� <<ll ha�its,ti�e �-e�lity is Ivarchern CaiiFvrrti� �rio�'e�om[�li�a�ed; 3t3"�� t�F jnl�s in chc e�egio�i pa,y lcss th�i� a li��i�ig w�ige,' ��feadqvar[ers We ��t �SWVV are wr�rh.ing tr.�Sten� [Y�is ritiing Eide c�f i�ieyt�aiity, and to 3+�11 EasC 12Eh Street �,n��Q make 5ilican ValEey a plac.e nf n�pnr�unity fn;�a[]. Ii�113is v�iil,we<<re ❑akland,cA vh6oi ir�aving to rxise slan�arcis 1'crr sccut-iLy u1�fi�er5 tliroiiglirnit l�s�5nut}y.f3�y, 1 �8�0��-3�� 2111CI E[)Cl��4CaFC}7L151nCSSCS ak�sc�ut irr�spc�nsihle secus-ity cc�ntraclocs. Elpple ��o�2s1^�039 f�x haS 1:01}�I'J�CIeC�GV1t.Il Oi7�SLiCE3�1T1�?�l7y�C,Sec�►�-ity ii��luslry Spe.ci�Etists SanFranostaaHi[e fSIS1, f(]P[iS C:ti7l�7115 SG'Clli'lIy lseeds. We �+elie.vc that App1e��ui 2iid �15Pa1k5treet ShaUlt�do �etlet-. 5an Frandsco,CA 94107_ ��4T5J 55�-13�1 �4T5J 55�-i30i fax SIS�:c�ntinues ta be �ro�c[blc�clt tn ti�� Isfting o£sta��dards ix1 the ss:curi�y san.�ose o�ce industry. In [E�e pi15L L}l]'BL' �Ec1l'S, 5I5 l��15 reacltvd aut-of-cauf't se[tleancrs[s �Dr�Ru►r��tve �n sczu�c: tr{�ublin�la�vsui�s: in 241(l, the coa�7pan5� agreed ta pay`�7?S,UUU 5an�ose,C/1451�Q in a class actinn tawsuit brought by err�ployees inv�lving claiin4 oF missed �aoa)zeoai�a n�� d rest FrrGaks."[:vun �rorc tlisl�irbingly. 5I5 scttled in 201 1 with an {4p8J 2&0-78D4 Pdx under�ig�San .F3�ai��isco gi�'1 whn 'i11�C�,T1:CJ LD�1iiVC:�7{:L'E1 SL']Clliilly��ssHt�lted s�cfam�rnfl�r� by an «r�-duty Si5 nf'l�i�:er."''I'iier�as-e«t}seT•cuscs �,t SIS l�eing s�ied hy i�a�z�s�5tree� cm�li� ees, nii razinds t�f ryei�cler ciiscrimiT�ati��n raeial and i-eli �ious 5u�tc3�o i Y � � � � Saaamenta,C/t95911 cliscriminaLi��n, ai��i di�crin�in�iirni has�.d �7n sGxual c�ricntatinn.'" (9i6Jf4B-950S 'I'hc I�rnh{ems ext.e��cl h�yc�nd thc I�lat�nl.acts of w3•��gdoing,however. I�i 61 ae7-aeo�rax Many af SI5' afii�ers�re�.la5sifiecf a5 "Flex-time" wnrkc:rs, unable hy Lett 82 cont. Gnmpany desigi�lo work more tl�ai�paE•t-timc hours, and therefore de�}ied access to benefits or sick days. SIS nas also faught workers' attempts to furm a union as a means t�f raising their workit�g�onditinns, with S1S goi»g so far as to scnd spics to warker meetings. For this beha�iQr,t�iey were warnea by the National Labor Ite[ations BoaP•d in 20I2. Wc arc pleas�d to hea�•of Appie's�omn�itmenl.tt� livizig wage, uniUn.jobs in the conslrL�clion af Campus 2,as e�iden�esf by Ehe c�inpany's a�reez��ent witli the Santa Cl�ra and San f3cnilo Couuties Buildix�g and 1 Coiistruction Trad�s Cnuncil.We are alsn excite�i to k�ear of 1lpple's pledge�f manies towax�ds �arinus conununity benefits, such as new affUrdable hc��tsing, the creatio» nf park iaiids,Uikc and pedest��ia�� Cont. l�nds,azad so forth. Taken to��ther,it is clear that App�e is e�nt�racing its role as a"resp�nsible coeporate citizen," as �uardiai� and sl.ewa�-c�of�pz�ogc�essi�e visian fnr C:u�rertina an�l thc region as a whnle. Apple]zas the apportunity, �nd the�nwer,tn cnsut� iivablc wagcs and "good jobs" for all its subc�nt�'actcd cmpioyees, inclt�ding the se�uriEy nfficei.s respnttsihle f«r pra��[in�Appfe's pr�perly and ern��ayecs. We ask fhat�lpplc do right by its security afficers and choose a��esponsible sccurity contr�ictc�r ll�at is�ommitted to raising staildards for i[s workers. M�kc a i[l0°/o cnmmit.m�nt to a progressive C�pertina and Silico�l Valley, `"l.ffe fn the Valley Eevnomy."W�rking Partnershfps USA.2d12. `�Grootboom�.5ecurity Industry 5pecialists,Alameda County 5uperior Court of CA.,FtG-(]943544� `��fllga({.�.5e�urity industry 5pecialists and Applc,Inc.,5an Fran�isco County 5uperior Ca�rt of CA,CGC-17-51�624 "'Smith v.Apple,Inc,Security Ind�stry 5peei�[ists,et al,5F County 5uperior Court,CGC-10-5fl035;Massaquoi v.5ecurity Indsastry 5pecialists,Google,Inc.,et al,5anta Clara County 5uperfor Court, 1-12-CV-233187;drtega,et al�.5ecurity Industry 5pecialists,et al,5anta Clara 5uperior Caurt,11-CV-203664 Lett 83 � � � � � �� JUL � �' �Ui3 � � � �U�. l � � , ��lP�A�'�NQ �i�'Y�L.��l� �,� �ae��r �� n�n� �ri u �nr+ - �i��m� ��i�E T�T��.4�T �I�YIR�NN�E]V�TAY. C�IpA�T �EF�i�T F�R�FFLE C�II�PUS 2 �ubrr�itted b� t�(�N{�ERNE❑ �1�'I��NS �� UPE1�TliV� �i� july 17, �413 Lett 83 cont. �aFr�l�x�!� Data Re�ive� 'TAHtLE €a� ��IVTENTS ,1�J1 � � 2b13 Pue��c I�rpur p��y r�� C�TY t)F C[,f��R'�'��[��'}�PPLE �1TY OF [�+iENLO PARFCIFACE5c3+OrC Ehf'LF'IF20N Mi�IVTJ�L IMP�.CT REF�RT �ITIG.4TE�l�f; TR�4�� I�[l7lGA7"Et3M: HOUgI M€ M ITi�ATE�N: P.�.FtK F'I$�A).,,11+1PA�'TAMALYSIS APF*C.� �']��AL 1l+rIPAC7 ANALYS�S �I�''FQSCA�11�l1PACT ��J�y,��15; �OfV� �ue�.rc�►cc;�ss APPLE�I�fvIPlaS 2: �IQhI� 1 C�.r��,z.� �RE�Et 7R,�.i� 5E�L11��7'�' C3��F�,[.QPT�1�l�[T AGREElrI�MT ��1�9MU�ll'�Y��,NEFITS ,l�5�4t�d�E7'[�tY UF APRR�V.4L NQT�..� CO[SIDIT[�T�[OF.$PPR��,(AL PRUNERJDGE ea►�►EI�UE '�'..r'AL�OF PRL'1�1E�Ft1dC.wE�'CT�NlJE PF#UN�F�1D(i,�AY�1�U� ALTERIVATIV�#.�: TI� GL��UREI�,�L� d�F'RT,I�I�n]dGE J�`tSfEMU� A�Pe�oix F1�UI�S �l�[aM QRAF� ��{}f1RONMENTAL EMPAC7 3�EP�R7 Lett 83 cont. PUB��C �NF?UT ENYfR�NM�IyTA��NIPACT R�ppRT SC�PIIy�[� �E59IQ�I�S��EI�'SB�E�$, �O I 1 F�C]SL7� 1P[PUT M��7�NG(S�: l�IC11•TE 5EE�ITX'�F MENL.Q PARk/Fq�E�O�T� �TAFF}��POF2'T�F'DR CCT"[C4UNC�L M��-f�1+L�6 PL.ALNN�,py�COMhqISSCC?t�l 11+IE,�TIf�IGS l-+1flU3�t�a C�GM1a1�fis�D1V '�r1E�'rAMG �OM[�UM17Y MEE�`11VGS �b��S4`�3T'� Ol.l'TREACH M��'Ih3G R[��1.,,�G C7IJTREAC]i h1EET1N�", aF3AF`T E�1��4p1�Q�El+�lT�MP�iCT R�,POF�T'�..)UNE�5, 2a13 2 "BtGAUSE 7H�F�R��l�C7 t5 A`f'SUCH A�l E,ARLY 3TAGE.4�if.Y VI�R37T�1��QMM�N'FS �rZE B�IfV�AL`C�P`fED,Ai�T3��7'AT�D BY THE�A�fFaRhiiA�[vvlR�t�IMFJ�I�C�UA.C.I'CY �� OCfF2C�: RE3]��N'Ys SUHtif[�'�'i1�311fTEN COM[viENXS Fai4 APPi�CAMPUS 2 A7 .JUhIE,2,$I�+IEET(NC'xJ�ITY QFF'IC1�tLS C1M�4�LE T��iOL.I�Pu��,��H�AR(NG `11TTHIS 57.4�E' 6Y ALI�4�fILSOFf GUP�RTI�IO�QUi�l�R Ju��5,�O 13 PAGE 7 cc�nnn��rrr; �in��rEr� Lett 83 cont. Finr•.ie ftisr��des ' itih'Houi:9Jl.lalidxi'rt # [:ourac:ll:: _ t:,s... � .. , :'i' � � r � '+� ti,'i1 h �' •'1 :$T p�: y, 1 � �i� F. u• & . y r �,_i��i�'��'i�,;i�r.:��i 1l'�",�5:��a�'!S ��1�� .�1�s:��i:�i��„��i�k'.�ti�� n' r•��'t� ;.Y,�.°r;. ._��`�i!:.�. r,� -- -.�.�._.��.�._�—_:_•--�- s��k°:Pi�'a:°' ?�e�?�:fir��i:z�vae � . . �'idt�P'��:i"7�T7` Tha F��a.�.,nk C?rnu:F�uj��iri�ndea t�.v'p prq-.��t�ae��ndu�v�:cf[h�Gact ! Si g n�r for Fa��aou Cam�us ! i:�.�npu s:�n J'��l�i5f�:an'Ru a -h?�roj�ic:l is tx:irnl Frc;r.P;s�d in ph�.�:es;vr tr 4h= 'rtjetf e��ail u'�a'es East C3rr�F-�aa e�ti�cincnts aphra�•ad b f thE CiEy Co-Jr�e�l i:�fJ1+�Y a�c Jvne Q- _ -__ _ �______, _ �C�17.TiE Ffi.S t c�e�aat CamCu3 i;Ioca�e�s e;� I•IiGi�.9f L'U3}3=1a�b,9G �r�.lavF:y.:ec�:7cJ by Ora::�;=rnreinlly Sun P,tic.-oayst�ins�. rnQ s=te is CUfI-�c'I-�FI4 f�L'YIiI-]f�cd'�1i-1?fllf z qull:ling3.StFir�i rnnfeir apprnx iliellrly-I,iS:i5,Gd�] �.3an?[��t.a�p�rq o`th;�]r.��y Jf�A��al: n May and Jure�.Fe�x+hoas ha4 ��'�y` Fi=?''�x�'� i:nplPn-en?:d a�ie�iii;u3artrip r,a,� v�hi�l�a lav�s e^_prc:xim�x�iv 6,�U4:r11n3d•�o�,, to c�s�,up t�S+�&3�Ceir'��IS.[:d�7cil i��i-w arR-;�cti�i��r lh��=a 6!Campr�s ERV[rOr1rn�htAf Impact Repart(CIRE �nDt�emcr,s�i::e:�nplc;te y=id suGsec�.ient orojeci�t�iE+.v wi!E t��tas�,r�J��r�u�r,v �nd pc�mu e pxn+rai�rmq4i•a�!ar tir d�,s�kt�am�.��acmpencni;�f�e� •=-Ji�CZ1;�1=5 6f11f18 f�lkvi�uli�i�ti;iE�l �d4279a.SCEn:H�lS 2f•�jr[.i. a�..iy�:=a�;r�iai�d h�ifh ine propusal t��ci�r�i,y tr�RC�n ar�assnaa•.ari 1'F�epprv�irne'gly 27-arr�t�1iE�s:C:i�pus is!�ca:�n at t•,�intersa�:�cn of carnrr.an_b;umr51. 'T�i�a�v P.o�d�nd BFay7�n`Chcpress.��a� '1"ha�#:inr,uriz�n 1y a_ii'r�ar;�d�ts;�n�l 2 313 c�iNrst�ZUt'o�i�ri�+a,wil� th�ert+4�pa'iyr.th7t ififl ad�rr:s��II�upd�teci in Pro;aet PEans th�neai�li��t•�n� r��;�-�lis ccat�:n nt:r��ro:ec�si.o.tY�i��n��d C011t. R�98r�r�¢tha f'roj:ct pr�;nses dernr.l tion o?Li��Yi�c�ug[•rs I�uildi'Icb�,r�a aeF.00i�t�d�:te_n�prp,.+�-�ent3,GuASr•qu�ntl f:iht�applio��:se�ks Eo cnismir.r -5:=1ar,pr�jec'pf ars fUr the proposa� s�.��^�?raxlrk�ly L�a,�yy sqasr�Io:E b�i�d�r�g nr-t�cr��.irfaer��+iun��rat wnu�l in;,l�¢e ap�rucin�a��ly i ri;f�F,arkirg sn:teas.T h��n,po�ed p�o.�:'[is carUiatc.�t�vith siA�,l-,',f.Cene"al ln�v$t ial.7iet-i��s zo-r� e:a�i•e�ri�fati,=ui^,pt ;.��. St�sh2�ei4�t vf:ne strueiuig e,nd 1he prn��r f?at ca��:eq�.wfii�l:n'au!ts ': a"?.G�efir, rx-��a 9-e m�xiii_u•n�p!i�ativ tc�aignland latva4er:�g�inthc N-2 za�, lu s�ch,.�rgx�yg t�'.�3•2-?{it3nnenl fnr.natrifl,I�oi�;:'ti�r a�dH•ielcypr'�en1,y.u8 Rad-�el�:;:ssin��n..+,r�e•::'�r�Fylnnr.�:r �ppraval•�f o r'•�ruitlon�i 17erelopEne�t Parcni�;G�}P}vroa d b�rvuu n�d ta t-rrsii.r.mgrosemar5�-ncrlo�arte.arg cv�c:�E��,�r,��t im��. f�hvn»:834-33p-C,�37 ` ��E�`� ��.��:;.art� �`r::i,y:°;a�; .�:�tt��x�> . fl�C:-��n�l S��f�ke�oYt-.ApF-1i, .7n iJa��!i 26,7n3�,1Yte rrly C4uncil dWprouod all rsquestadlacd u�c �C'13 erti�leirc.�l:ans!agr�emenis f3r Th�h��xLcs:�k��wf r,.aFrp:i�P:ojecl,ansl . "��Cu:r�ii st�r'RepLri•'v3?r�h 2�i. in r�d�a��s t�e�Jrd r+nncc::fiC'Ldni[Ic�:he v'over[/anJ appnarin}�rI�P ��5� y p�±rfl:��n vn:A��fBr"�ni.C]n�p•i12,;�C�1 i,EI�N C ts t:otir}�i �dppt�d.he • -larnirc�[;s:iria3sian�:,�•T'3e�flrt- ��zanlydan�l'zvr.lry;��'�:��l.a�rdeinerit4rrih�ei.:�?.TI�lsr.rJ�se�n.i�rrcn� FFb:u.�ry 7�,zqi� vr:ce3y f��:hs pr��ct:�r.vr cuinpefa.arrJ�-i��;��ican,is�i:r�{i n{�f�tad��o . �ousiriy Cc�rr�rriiu;icm SfFt Repar[- F��n�iie�o rc�cletieiap t�a site. �marup�s.?�.7.:,=Rlo[Aw:C'tf�0'rl.y '�SCF�CC�1u+a:!rran�2�G'] • Gi.y C�r:�:154i''Re�]�R•Jar�:�ar/ :�a.�•;.�tls.2�"ar� i�w.%''!�(^kt' 26,z�•�a • Cit}�C�7�.hCil S'aff f`vep�rt•C]c6uhar "hd foll::afino y;prC'4a 5 ai�6�+3;ui�t;r'F��Uie ttio Li:o� 3C.2'.11'l o Pis•m��E Gor'�mi5si�r•Staff k5po't- Esst Carc�N�s�ap;lican[roceil-pd��rcvnl� 9euleir.her Z4 �G12 1 Lett 83 cont. • Cid}Counc I 5taff�aport-�sCspiCrt.bt:r • :1m2ndaa ane rt25tat�d�arauiun�n ud�ocprrPn[�Pr n t � revslo�m�t r�rPYmF il .��ily Cauncil 5Laff Fse�xd-J.rr'�S. ■ �zf1�d�T��K'At�al'er?nita 2n�� . env�mnmerta Revlew . Glty Caursdl btaff Ftopen-�lay 2e, y,�;t�;��,�e��upFicjnE hae app:ied frs pE+mi[s] ia7� . P1�n�in�i',nmrrubsi4n Staff Repart- . Rez.�rint i�a�r��to M1-?-x ��Y 7�zd�� , Ca�cl-lanal De•+eiaprrv�rir Pprn'i: . Citr Coun�il�'Eaff Re�art•A,pl�:i�, . �v=_;c�rient Rgreemznt 201w . Lct Lin9 r+cjus#m:rtt . [:ay F:cru«�il staf`Re�art•F�a�u�r�+ � He�st��7ree Herr��ra P�miF�, 1d �}1? • Be.'n+v iulark�l R�Gs`la:�sing i�yr�nrh&�! . L'it f Cauh�i l 5tat Repa�t-Jan uary . Cnv ronme n.ai F�a�;�u+ 31,2�12 . �'t�Gou�cif5taffRavG�t-Jhnuary '6,�012 . Plnr.rir�g Commissi�n 3k+E�Re�?�A p� q y ,�� c {y:�� ,�A�!I.if�'A �1..J'�� 4'��i6�L1� SS��Z4i.��-L1-?J.�RIA��.t`-i'..f �r-J . City�ornci Sie`�F�cpv€1- Nov�meer 7 5.?4�11 Jt FLS��as been prepar�:t^��:rl�t_i�.�Itia iinrz�rA�Ft�e�ni�asad Prvjcc:on t�i: o Cliy r2.air.91 Slnff R�poci-O�tt�c�! ��+a'.�r.nd m��enuPS tflr tho City cf kfer•lo perl�-a{±d athcr A.vernme'rtai�•nilti:{ �S Z�..� that�vx�thr�rojec�.ai�;��cludin�che Islc�!n F�rk Fira Pro[m�tlryn RisiricE, . C,ty::vuroil 5'aff R�po't�,��us�23, rncnlo P�-k I.��nicival 1��[rar 0 strirt,L+�est 6e�y Sun�ry C�i��r�l,I".ierre7'arv ��7�± e�1F FI[�h�Ch.4:Di3:;ir�.�:�n kl�tea Cau itv OF•ic�af Cxucatw�S'usci�l . City C:�x�r.c;l S,aif Repor.-Ja ic i�. �isi•ici.5En fvl�.teo G�r.ly Earnmuni{�G6iICgG Di;t�ic.,FI'�Sie h,1i��ar�i Zssila ��1 R�Sg�er�� n�P?�e t�sir�n. . P�annin�CammissicnS�eff�uo�l- M�E 7�.?41 l � ��a��isc�l fmFac.{tinn?y�s(rl.S}�11 r I,AB� . Cit�Cv�ncll 9taff�ep�t-f�Aav 7�]. 2C�'1 • Res��nse t�Gemme-�:e vn ena or�fc FIA . [I[y G:�.ncik Sta-`RHpi7il-Ap[?I:i. � p��F�r„�ai r-v�pact G,nalysis�FI�]�12�,18J 2�]i s 2 cont. �"Ara�4ii:'f"[GiP�ll:+ti i`s �¢1��5�14'.'�k�E�Y`L"-.i�L:�.l.:*'�4".'s'�23�'�_ a Cil�Counal�M�r�l %Ci.P�13 i:n[7-�xar.i6&'&,2C�`1.?'��:i1y held aoarninunit+,mectiw�{�0'1'Ise Fecslaek � f 157ni79 Cerrmiseion Fahruar�[i. varn��as�r�+i�ft in ardcr;vvrr,vieia a��mj�actsurnnta•y ar>J nforn•a4i•3�,+x�ri,a ��,�-� ��•aR t1f<��Fik,Thie. t1dE`tlF�fl{nnk��I��tie�el:�t lulenlo�ark:S�nior C�nicr n . C�ty'Couiiail�Jan�+�ry 7:,Y093 the i#�i�r�rfavr�ri ii�g�borha�d . Ru�li�buiraapk'��lzeting-[7r.�oL�er 1$ iU�'L s Ar�end�Nnli� . Plai�nif+q�ammis�ien•S�r:9a�ri�Hr I3 2��i l � hStiiY F�a�n�atiar? ' I�AT3j � City�au�e� [�rirrary; AAey�:�;lU1c + �iAPres�f�tinn . C�rvGo-u�cu{T�arsp�rtatlan)•��3� �4,�p3� . Plannin�Cornrra3s�a'i-May'r',.�,C';L •L:ity wouroil•A�ril'17;��2 . City CO.irell-�aGr��terr 1d 91"]�� o��r�o.ircil� Jant�a'Y 31,�0'€? , f anni�q�ommieeiar S?t�mary;- �� uhscriheto FacaboatCampus�rcjECt JanL:a'y 9,20 2 • f�lsnr�ii3}]COmnliF�i-n 1�I.a.)•�l811'.lEf}' B.FG1? . C;amrrun iy F.�le6tir�g{Pr]'nary�• [7gpa�:�er 3.2b1 I . Co�nrnunrty luleeYin�[�If+j��E7eueRi�3� � �1�'�a af.�vall�hi31[y o'[srR��li and $ Zq�T P.ihlc I��iarin�•O=rFn�tar 1 fD11 � Nc3Y Pre9enSEtlon-P�9ay:?,�n'� • ha�JP='r�ae��tatian ��1ay fE.�411 e Nos14a o��re�aretian{N�P)far[ho F!R-Ar il'1 2017 . Publ�iisar ng�lo;l�-Ap.�i o�.7a11 s��E�kA:r':[fi}�f,:e_�.°i:l�� 1�9t i.8�1pUS RGStLa rd N�liuj• �iC_i:�i.,._�l i�.�i;= Q:tc7er^fi�[7 s E�st P8 0 htC rlC.ieln��+l�o'ditbiii[y • oalle Havenl�IWII�1l'C3LISIf3P.fi9 A[PA Analyvis Dscarr��6r 1'.��3'f' Uc�i�n una�i,��e•IYlay •g,2011 � C��l'�YlkClty�1L1�'�ir.f�IYlEeiing Ar�F�d�-C7eee.r�te•8.2D11 • C tkmide P�t:afc No[ica-D'_c:emner ' 2{:i i 1�s1��u1R 1 s Lett 83 cont. �Itl�a�i1411: �I'��C Tt�affi� Is Resi�lents' Primaty �oucern About�iew A}�nl��mpus ��u�i'�e: H�adlir�� uper�tina Ca:�rier ��?ternb�r 16,l[}11 Suggestions: Fredete�-rnf��r.ept��l��r•a/�e�e�e! �ecrera��Frr��ri�8 Cr�p �:�r.�b,�rsh �Y-rp Cap�Tr�i� �c�p Fe�a�ty Est�f�f��h 7't'�Cnsp�v�'t�'t��ix� N��a�e�t�errt Asso�i�t'rnn De�ermir�e L�7t�ir�a�arrrertt I��t��c�vf��npr��ted Stt�c�ts,d�t��:��rGians a��ad 3 F�-�cw��.S��aa��r�� wsfi�}t +�e{��r�-c� ta �'��1��iv� �n�.L`c�rt�rxric Lu,�� He«lett PGcic�rri �pI�le ,'lppl� i]A J13,r�.� 1�,f�1111 Phatie�l 2,3i)2�D[�0 �.f3��,D0a FI�'Iain f3uiidii��] �,$�O,f10�� 5��:��r� I"c�t 1Z�1,€]00 {�i��ditoriurn] ].�0.11U1� 10��,{}bQ �Fitness�entcr� Z{}D,�� FsS,[lt�+� 30i],Q�a(F��S��r�h I'�ci3tt-i�s� 3tlf?,17f�� '��i.l�� C��17#1'3� P��ll�� f0�}D �S�CUTII'�' RL'GCpt14[1} ��ic {t�air.r.et��rtce) P��r��:� nfa , �tJil,f10{� 30i},U�l[} .�r�iAare 1��ct 1 Lett 83 cont. Ti�tal Sc{uai'2 r�et 2,�}5�,i�(�U 3,G�•�E,0�7G �,b�1i],OOU 1��'easci�5ql�a='c l�eet 983,i1{lLi+ 9£3:t,f]D{1} f;m�lo��t�s 9,�3U0 13,��}�Y �phi�� 1� 1�,�10ta ' - �0�f.Fha��2a 1,'' I `3,�i[lU "l�„Z00 14,2l1[1 lucrea3e in # 4,��4- 4,�-{}{} �f��x�pla}'e'c� 3 Parkir� �?,Z2f} 1a,5D0 1Ca,5UU Cont. [9,c�U0,'�ait]�itea �9,(70�] [�!.5D[1 T�r�t�u 5it�� (1,5�� Tr:�gloy�Q3 - # Parlting {a8f)� 43,�[1;,� �3,71?{t� "�P�1�G��expar�rl it;rurrent Trans��o rt�tfan Dezr.;��7c1 l�iana�ement ('l'DA�[]progr�m, �r-hi�h �Chieves a ZB��t'�ductit��t i�1 pealti hof.r{.rirs,..,� S❑��rce: A��lica�ioi�far Er�ti�i�a:irner�t�l L,eadersk�i:� Uc�ti�r�aprt�e�7t Pi�ajc��t�l<iTPd A�ri� 1S, 2U12 �Q 1111]]�Ilt: '�+��4,atis ba�eline aum}��r vf�r��lc lyou�•t�z�s� ��01pp1�C8C37pLi5 Z GVOl�Xd ati[:t�[y�Y11�C�dte a�7prOK3mately��4,2 D�l em�lEti�recs at fu::�tcu�an��. This ccl-�-esp❑�cis to ar.er-�rloce d�r�ity of 4.15 exnpl�yces l�et•1rbQ0 s.f..,.Ck��PmPln�e�density. pr�p��sc1 al Lk.e prQjec�site is highez'than int�ustrv st�r.d�rd� (3.3 em�alc�ye�s pet�x,4[�� s.f.�nd �l�plc`s�xis�in� �arn�aus�.� �h�In h��ite L❑��c�m��.s and affic�sc�uth�f[vlariani �ve��ue:n 4 Cti�sertin«(3,G em.�l�s,}�ces per 1�DL4 s,f.)." S�urce: Draft'I'['d�1�5p�rtatlori ItnpactlLt�ly�sis � Lett 83 cont. ��FC11C&F'��rs NI��31,2�13 YagQ 1 ��yn�i�,��e��z�,zu��- #��-i��,�ti�,��a) _ �,70+J Def�cit�#��ypl��•ees ti�,�ao� 25�+,etnp3m�c�s�vJ�c�r� „f?��er 4,f}fl� of Lhe emp,oyees vt�o�'kir��t Ap}�1e��.IIl[�US�.N'1�.CU:711TllECE t]�j��ulkir�g, E�ikin�, puhli� tran��vrtati�n,a�:d�4�u��lcs �rc��id�ct��Apple. �r�urc�; Appl�C�mpus 2 T3rn�hu�� tlpri I 2 D 13 '`f}n�nf th�ht�c�uestions is wn�c;:ei��c buil;3�n�s A�pl� is lea�i��c�ztsi�c ar'�u�cr�i�a c�,�i11 hc 4 t�nipo-az�worKp:��i:�s f�r�mp�a3�e�s dFSplaccc��•!�ile ihe�omp�n}�crrnsh��cfs(rlpple C3n��u� �]." C011t. °�1��A�hopes �o l�ae�t� 1 q�,{h[lil e��E57c�y«s at thai=sil�{l�p�1L3(:ainpus 2J,up Pr�m estirn�tes nf 11rf1��+��ti��r�ers i�7 tu�re c�f last u�ar,�. '`.4pple h�d insi��] �}n shnrr-r.erm l�ascs in the Lt�ree ta f�e��eax�•aa��:iL� Yal'i0115�7:[1�1n5iOR sit�s_n 4unn�fvale,but nt�«•is si�n�aY�,S�vGn-tc�ten ,�eas�s." CUii777L�11t: As th�se]�as�s et�d,'cvill ihe fluR�il�e�•u(�m�lvy��s inereas�at�lpple Carn�us 2� A�si�Carn�s 2: A�de�V��-i[�Esii�ua�� "'�t��1l71UllIiL L}I YL'hi�l�t��fic Chatiu'��:.'d be�dded hy Cam�i�,5 �t�ras estiinated 1��.�iti�l:i�lyin� Ch�nu�'r:�et'af�T��l�y��:s htir kh��m�u�t of traf�i�e�}�es:ttd to l7e��xY�i'r.�ecl p�r�rr_�S4)�ec. Thc trip rat�per�m�lny��i5 k�<<s��d on da�. c:�!lctt�td at Ap�l�'s Inrnity� i,�r�p a.nd�'lari�ni can�pus on ❑e r�n�a I3ra al�varc� in tl'e L�ity°aF{:�i�erti�v, li�catt�tin�f�rr traFfi�'��lrca�y heici��17crated�� tfic; es-:imate.��1,84•1 empl��yt��at th��rns�:�t sitP in ,�tlgust��i11,th.�t�e�v sus�.�1L-s dre 35,10�ciaily 5 t'�hic2e tri�as,3,2'��i•r��vl prak h�ur tri�s�2,8�� in��utid an�3#i'�•s�utbaun�],t�nd ;�09`�PI�1 p�alc �c�ur trips{7�b in ��c�uT�cl��:icl 2,:i0:� ��uthour.d�,u Sourec: Drwft Transp�rra�icrn Tm�act�aalusis lay r'ehr�Pe�rs May 31, �4�3 3 Lett 83 cont. �a�C ll! Cnmrnent�: $tud��is h�t5ed r�n 2011 HewX�tt-P�ck�rd vacat��lhe ya�ope��i�i �,U1:� 'Coxal amaunts af txaffc wnulr�mare arcuratcly reFl��#th�tral�'i€fmp�ct�f tr��arnject. 5 R�st�CC the sen#en�e� 7'he prUposed�lpple Campi�s�'�viJ3 gQn�rate 50,97� daily C011t. vehi��tri13s, �,54�A�I pc�khour trxp��3,953 i�U�uxtd�nd 5�}1 aut�aQun�i],and�,�,�iF pM��ak bs�u�r�•9ps [1,�3T in�nund�nd 3,655 aut�r�und�. S�u��e: T}ra�t Tran5poT�ati�n[roipact Analy�is b�Fehr&P�cr� Ta1�l��3�'rip Gen��ti�a-��a]al�f'�m�r�a:�� P�� LiiT'itii�g�arkinb 5up�7l�� is�rio�heC T�lPJI straLe�1'2ter�ncc�,in ttle�[1:3i](ic:�er.il l'4an (�'��r thL• Ciky of�'launtain VEe�n�I.' S�ymsung site in h�Iaur�tain G':eti1-: 1�'�i, C�i�uc:LiUi#I7'�m Parltin�Uxdln�ric'f; 1 pdC�lil�5j�8.GC f�[}i� ever� 33:� sqz�are��et c�Fgross flvor urca�l p3.r�cina�s�a��far•e�e��UO S�L'.��'��e�L 4T T��G�' 1SliS7T' �r�a. ^.�U171'CC: �:IL�'4F 1Vic}unt�lY1 LF�nC+yr �i�f[:oun�il Mr��lir� h�areli 19, 2�13 se�t�R�pnr��,1 6 P�g�w A��le�ite in C�:pextina��U4Lll�1►tariani �105��No-rt�T�e�ittza Bau�etrarci "�3-sP�] n:�thc pa:-iking ratia fot'oFZ�e huilaitiga i�z T�tile 1�.1U[:�.c3�l.f��A) nf the Cupe�rFi�no A��nic��=�]�:pce,�ar.h l;uilding re��ir�s dne parkin�s�ate per��i5,;quar�Peet at�uildin� a r�a," 4 Lett 83 cont. Source: P�anning Ccrnmission M�e!ing Nnvr�mh�r�5, '�UU23 Planiiir.�C'�mmi�s�Ur�5=aff��p�rt Arenda ltem�# Application� h7-Zl1Qlf3•t7a Ap[�lt t:ar�2�?�15�SltC'!7 C:u�7�rHr.d l'?�:�s�� 3,�?Qrfl�O yquare fe��'?85 syu�:r�fe�t=1U,�}47 Farking sp�c�s p�r Parlci��, 2G1� Urdin�.�ee P�•npased parki+�g�: 9:OU0��rk.irtg sp��es 10,9�l7 vs 9,Oa4= 1r4�7 rp�r��ents ��,reductian F:•di7r P��ke��Drdin�n�e �li�st� 3(i?,��4 squ.�rc fct�f'?S5 squ�irti fe�r.= 1,U53 parking s�aces��r ParEd:�� 12 Ot�din�n�e Yrcr�n��d p�.r1�1�t�: l,�ba p�?'l�i��sp�ce� 6 cont. �,[��vs 1,5+]U= �1•�I•'��+f�pre�e2ils 423'�iiicrease Feam Narlcir�g�r��inar.�r. P]��Se 1 2,�3�(�,17i7t�5qu�rc r«:T�285 5�t�arc:feeh = �,l�y�parkin�;s��ccs per P��rkit:� R}�ril �rdiit�lnc� 1�1:i Prup��s�r� p�rl�l.�: {�,[l0U parl�inb s�a��s �f,��3S vs �7,�vU -f19a i•epresents 9°�'��-c�lucti«n fram l�ar:cin��rdir.�nc❑ I'}xa�e.2 6�70,DQ0 sq�sare.F�eC/��3;s�{;;ar��f�et = �,1�a�1�lrl��i��pac��pGr �'arkxa�r �ipril �7r�inance zr��i Pc'U�rU�er� �tirl�t��; 1,5i��7 pa�kirb tipar.es �,��};�s 7.r;UG = [5i15- 1'�grc�sents �9°.�a deCwease Fram��i�lcing [7r��n�ir.ce P�:d3E�.�r2 3,1?O,C�f�ia:�c�uare fe�:!'?�3 y sr��r�fert = 3.2,DDa �arl;in�SpaCe�er Fv.�[c:ng 5 Lett 83 cont. April (?rdin.ii;c� �D13 1'r��4sLrl p�r:f9n�: 1U,5�C� 6 cont. 1��ai}Q vs "i},506 = l,�i(�fl repi'e�ell*S i�.5��a re�l�a�ti�+n from Fark9�i�Ot'[�ins:-icc '1�'�ns��rta�i4n Imp�cL POnalysis(Tl�] 4��hi�le tra'f c Gi reulatian,traiisit t�4e,bicyc�e�ircG!atic�n,�nd pedc;tri��n circul3tioii Mi#i�tiu�x �rxeasures ta�•��l1zr.� �rr elfmiz�atc haL'Cnfiajly sl��€��jCaC1t i mpd�Ls u�",;lie prvjeC:a�'� Idc:ntiiicd City��f C;up�rti�o �..�vel�f'Seivice�T,fl�) I}fcar all�ity'GQ fltl`all�d 5i�n�lt��int�rtiecl;�us except<<; th�:St��vPrs�:rc:�l;.}�otz�evard f D�An•ra k�uu[�vaE�d, 5teven;�'r+�cit Bs�uleG�.��/Stctitng Ra:�d� artc� De Aica�[ia��lc�ardjRn�linder Ra�� intCrSGC�inn. 5��uree; I]raft Tr�.n5p�rta�iuii im}�a�t r�r��tAy$is hv t�'eh r!�RL�r s I�'I�y 31,ZU23 Ta�rie �Intersectic�n L�5 �r�r�dards � Pag�6 LU�F = Op�raLiu�ns�^rith�elay�unacc�e�tak�l�t�r i�^dsi dr:�r�:'S QCCl.1�X'lI7�T{]LLC.L�1�L'�C S��UY�t1�3�� oor pra�rc•s�iorr�c�r�.°�ry��n�cys:le lei7gths. '1'01�1 rielay(s��rids Atr'��::icl��-brea_Gi•th�ti 80.6 5�urce: '��-�ns�or�atian ltes�arr.h Roard �.0��4 Hz�ha:�ay Ca��acit�h��ry��al �i�na lized lnt�rsectian Level c,F 5��•�ice Detinitiox��, I��r�on Cont�i l�c:a�� Pa�e 1�}-1{� The pi��Ject wrrctfc��xac�^r�i��e t�n�ece�t�b�e��rs�l.��.i��as ar rt�z�se �rar.r.�ntr�bl°S7��Tr1��XJ� �andik��:�s ac t�ze tollati�fin�interseetivns,�nd thes�ch.��i�e��tould bc curl$i[�ered a sigrlFficant im�a�et. 6 Lett 83 cont. Int.?1 l��i��fe RQad j I-28�Vo:'[hbo��nd RampS[Cu��r;ir��) �z�t- ��. Tan�.0 A��nue��lallco �'arlc�,way[Capertin�] lnt�6 Stcvcus�reek Boule��arcl��al�rert i}rrr��l-'Lti[s l��m�s �we�t) tf:��TPJ Sdut�ce: Pag� 393 Itnpac��i I�#��'s��t�ns a�d Fr�c�ay�cgrnent� Ir,�pacted Intcr��ctlansfllrQeKr�y Ramps Peals H�ur f�cl�yJCc�•c.•l,�f'Ser4-ir.e I+q�in Stre�� l��+pie C�rnr�us 2 7 5 1]��In�� lin�ale�;ard�Iinm�sTead t�aad {;LJPf't:�1P cont. 2l Vlrolfe Road�'[-Z��] Ltrti�ps �n,frrh) AM CCJ�' Ti � F �'vl 13 � f: �� Vtir�Jf'e Road/�v�tllca E'ar�c��fay PM CC�l� E c� '!'�'�iitau�1vt•nuc f Homestead {�Up :31 '('ant;��: A�e:�iie�Vallcn i'<�r=tY�va�� AM f'fl�� PM CCJP C y C 3� '1'antaii A�'er�ue�Stever�5 Ct'�el[f3�u[�t'ai•� CiTF 3�1� ifrnt�Pslet�d Rc��tfi�ll.�a�vrei�ce E�r�ss�.vav Al�f CMP/�X l� PM � ;�Ei �r�'vet�s��:^�ek LiUUlcvar�i�.:al�Ferr f�riETef� .�3,h� CA��' C �y C �-�F#[}Raix7.ps�'+��s�.] PNI It a � 3`� S�eveils Creelc[ic�u�r.�ard1'f,aL�►�r�•rce �x��ressatra�R�7,��s (�:asi) �A��'J�� . Lett 83 cont. ��1 J�a vr re n��xpt�es s��ra�r f F-Z$�Ram� �s�ut,�] �I�i CA�iP�T??� �' r'h1 � 43 �3��lliii��r 1�cr�tlJLa�h•t��»°]?x�z'ess�v�v PM CM�f E�{ Jc ��2 St��en� Creelt 13�ru2��rd f 5ai�"i�ornas r�3�I CI�P E1- � T7- l�h�i k' � F i:o��nenr.: 7 '�'x�fFi�4evcl at i.n#�X^s��ia� oF'4�nlfe Rna��S#evcns Cre�k E�ulevard sho�7l�i be C011t. in�i�:at��,��tie�e�d p��t pra��ct,in EIR T�afftc at inter��ctian�f J��aney A�enu�/Sxc��s Crccl��nulc�ard should be inc�i[:a�qt�l,pt'��71E� �)45t proje�`.,in ElR Tra�fic at intet'sectiuu�f $laney Ar•�rtu�f Home�C��d Ra�[�should t�e indac�ted, �re�it�#�o�t�rojed,in L[R Traffic a�in�crse�tion a�'StevertS CreekJirallca P�rittieter kead,Wolfe Roa�i�Perim�t�r i�p�d�n�7 'I'erirr��ter R�ad it�elf,�lt�augh�priv�t�road p�•�vidin�accc�s Co 1�'a11c4 S1i��pin�C�ntei;should be c�nsi�ier�d in II[R f1�p�ki�ct�d Freeway,�rcgr3lCdt� «+cstboun�i[NorthboUnd]1-�8� Sl�$5 t�Fo��:tt::l T��r�ss�a�a�F �11�1 T�' I�e�n�a �ikulevard ta S�$5 8 Vucalre l��ad ko l�e A�zza k3aule vard La��r�nee�xpressti+��5tc�.F�»��r�cl� �1I�� F $uul��.a:d t:��+Volfe Road 5arat«g�11ver_ue �o La�rl�ence f?xprc5sv�ia.}��,'4�� F St�v�ns �l'2�k�{�ul�Uard 8 Lett 83 cont. �'�ir�G2��ster T�c�ulev3rd td Sar�t��a A�,�et�u�AM r F �-r;tz[i r.�,�^linch�ster Boule��a��d Ai�[ Pl�i F E�zstUauiia �Sou�I7L�uuricl�I-�f�0 �aa.hill �tpresswa��fo S}i�ia Pti'( F SR��t�� f�e�nza Saulc�Y�r� P�T C' f}�F4nz� Buulrsrard tn U�IpIIe Roaa PM F �+Volfe Ro�t�to f�at�t�etl�e Ex�re�sw�y� YM f� ;te�r��,s[;�eeIt l�aul�trard La��rr�r�r:�Txpress�vay/Stevt�s 4�r�Qk l'M F r g $oul�t�ar�tca 5aratnga�t��nue cont. Saralu�a Atir�r�tite to��inc�cstcr•Ti�ule�ard I'�1 �' lA'inch�sher lin��utird to I-��3D PUi 1� 4R ft� �Ncrthbound] Vt+`i��chester F3ouieUarcl Lr�Sa:'atc��rlGre�7u�.�AR F 5�tr�t4��A��e�]ue tra l)�,�n�a lioli�evar�l TJ��a l�u«leyaz•�� t4 St�UCns Cre�k ISv�zlev�.rd S'.Q�ens Creek �3nuteval�l��r 1-LH(1 l4i�7 i" I-'1.i�[}tn�'�Igst N�me$tead koad A[�I � ��le;t iXom�stcad Rr.acl tt� F2�em�:��y�nue�h� 1= � Lett 83 cont. �I�$6($nutl�bannd� 1-2�0 Ca 5te�c�s C�cck BQUleward P[vt F 5t�r��n5 Crc�el�T3r��tlt�ai'd to De�x�� PM , �3o�alc�•ai•d Qe t�riaa Baule�,�srd tv��tr�i��a 4venn� Pt�f 2�' �aur'ce- {:its�•r�f Cu�ertinn 5'o�rce: Cft��a�Cu�r-i:irz;� h��ain Street�up�;�-�ino ��;,le E;�mpus 2 En�ir�n°ncittal Im��;�ct RegUrl lld�leudur� IIr�f'.;I�nvironrr.�ntal lmiaa�'k T��sr-t t�arG� ��7�� Jun�e 201� �nn�mn�nt�: [rnp��ta frecwrt�SEgm�nt is Idtt�C�.p��itX g �iiti�acion me�sUres,such as ramp miEi�alivns, d�>>�t increa�.s�fre�u�aylane ca�racit�{ cont. Raix�p init�$atimns n�t ur�d�r jlarisdictinre c�f��nF Cuperdr�o M.iti�fltion m�asures s�aulr�a�dress[cet�ack�n fre�wa�r i'dlnps�nd streets fr[3t]]dt�d tn Fi��er��y ramp�.s tn mir�irni�e yueuing,e��ceialiy�l{al#'�Rvad "...plzysical iinprovemencs th�t increase th�ca�rarity af�h�stutly fi•eewa�•se�r�:u�xl�caa.ld pat�ntia:iy ini[a�ate th��n�acL's:' "...�:x�r�� .ar,e �ragr�ms cr:nsis�flf con��rtir-g thE�.i4�i��,Hi�;h�ccu��ancy 1�chicle [I-�a�J lanes tq 17i�1�-perfo�•:�72nce cx}�reSS lt��s.'� °�Hoti��vQr�thc pragrarns dti ndt increase fr�e��r�y�:a�a�it3r I�ecause nu a�irl�tiar�l lanE�a.re add��. '�hus,Cr e rx;�r�ss Lane p�ragrams s��ll not char.�e t'�e °esuEt�u:l��e fr�e��ay anal��sis c�r s�r��e�z�t�iz'eCt rr�ii��lt�o��f'theprojeCiim�cr.�.'� S�urec; t�it�c��AIn��r�-�in�'iC�v Final EnvirU��_nen�-�f im��ct Re�arC Clyd�Ave�1u��ff�c�Prt�jei� !�e�marand urn: Resp�ns�t��z5-585 �lYtde A�enuc��ffic:e Frojer:Dr4�fit�IR lFlrritten 10 Lett 83 cont. Comments N�hr dr Pccrs Jai::rary �5.2�7�.:� Fage 2 "A•:c4rclin� tti C�1F'auideii�i�s, fr,��,n�t�y saqmants ta ��f�h��rpEypssd�e�r'�lopmant is prpj.�lCd ta�dd firips equ�i t4�r greGter th�ri br�e�s�r::�art cf ths frsetivay�egrl�n�� a�aoi��m�st b�e•��uat�e�.F "_..caGA,;ities r.f 2,3�']0;+ehicles p�r haur per I�ns,�phpl)fc�r fre�r;ay�seym�nls witfii�ix or rnore la,-es and 2,2�0 vphpl f�r Pree�v�y s�yrn�•rts�vith faur fanes v��ere l�sed n the fr�eway an�ly�is: "T6bl�$pr��e.-�ts the capa�,it�es �f e�^h frP�uvay:t��pei�t 2rid tlle�slirriKted�ium�e�of tr��s add�C1�4 E�Ch sa,c,rn?r�t�y the praposed prv,�vt.:: ''Th7e mltigE�:ibr��i Preeway<<m��{s�Dr�sidered be�onc 4h�,uxr�e ni�n indi�didual develo�:rneri� �raje�t,du�tn the inabil�ty�f an�,ncivid�i�l prr�jract�r Cityto ac�qulra ri�h;�Tti4a�+f�r frssn�ay�vi�e�irg, F��v�a�impro+,�erne�l�alsv ur�uld r�quira apprp�,��l by G�Itrans,WhIGT] fl°Ith21 ZYI�pfOje�t applicant no• g the C�ty van auarants�.Therefera.tho uddition o-proje�t ir�f�r.r�s�ilts in �siQnificant and _nayrvi�a�IQ mpact fa rF��i�entifiad fr��•rra�segmen[s." C011t. Sc�Grca- �€ty�i�Ao.�ntai� �lew DrtiFCTP�r1,��ar_afian Ir�p�ct An�h�RIR Cly�e Avenue•�[fi��Projeet January 2�,2013 �a�c ad `If Gaitra��$qpes not apFrave i�provemCnts wit�Pr�y�ars from---F7�+rel��ri,�-,t Agr�errzent�ffacti��e da:e, cUIC� 1�7� Appl aan'd?rr3�119t"at�3=h�E i=has nar�ed�i!gPnhly t�i�ursuQ Calii�ns 2��Nrov�l ic�the satisfactian�f th� Public 4Vcrks lirectcr, in I�is�1��r�I�di�c;retion,then ihe,�p�l1��1C s-311 ae rslisv�d of res�or'�.bil3ty t4 canstr�l�t th� i�u�rr�r:�•rient an�th$band shall ae rel�v��d kry th�Gi��i�ar the tlpFlicant subr'iits'unds�qEial ta the updat�ci $�t rnateti constru�uton ca�t tL t�� City. Th�Cit��m�y usP the funds for other transpor:atEan imprauer�ir��,.,,� Sourr�: C::n:litianal �}ev�npment Perm t��r Facehook'�1est CBmpuv �it�r af h�?�rl��afk 141ar�h 2�, �{'li�i Cotnm�nt: iJnused tr�f�ic rniaig�l�on �ind�sli�ufd be€isetl t�� ihe Ci�,�of Cu��rtino f4r ot[�e�• 9 d�an��'�aliun imprr��eme�Es. 11 Lett 83 cont. �nviroitrnet�t�l R��i��v `:��4'�,e» a��-U#ect add5 `1 l�erccnt mor�trafPic durin;the pc�l�haui•t❑ �free��y s��;:n�r��i��, at LUS F,it is a si�iificant imp�.et u�ader the L:aliforriia�iltrirnnm�nkal I��ial?ttt rlci [G�(�t'f]:' "The t;it}f[:t�ur1C'1�r.nrt�:G a StatCmCriC DF ��'�rridin�;i:i�n$idcra.iot�s, Finding tha� ltiG��o��arz�i� vilalily UC 1��it��r�iadc thc+�ffi[`e�rt��th n��e:s��}; lhere r�r�r�nn r�c��c�n��l�lc mitigations a��ailable tcr avc�i�i Frce��vaU xxnp��ts:' 10 5vtirce: t;ity ot Maunt-�.;n l�Fe�nF City C:�aticil NI�etir�� I�larch 19.?��:� �:�ty C�>>ncil Re��rt b.1j6�5-��5 Cly�dc�lvenue�S�rn�u r��} �4gendzl Item�#� ��tabiish �rip�a�p�Trip Cap F�ualt� "'lhe�ity(clf f;uperkino] �v,�lu�terJ �h�fe��ik�i.ity oFa itiliti�atian n:�aSUre rec�i�iring a"trip e�g"' �i�rl�r a tr'ip C�p,dnce dc�rcE�rpmc:�t vf,he pz•aje�,��i'�e5�c��ei'al�y l�'ip�nlurr.es that exce��l �M an�i P[�1 pcalt-h�'.ix�alu�s foi't�iggering im�sa�ts ta*.�:c t�ansportation��stem, c;�ntinued c�e��elE7prnenl: ��:(]�I'QWt� at tl�e:j�f4j��k S�C�lvoul[��]e Il{lIC2[�. 5❑urce: Apple C�m�us�.L�ra�Environ�r�cr�tal�rnpa,:t Re�o�•t �une L[�13 11 P�;�4�1 C��riYr��nt: 1�p�le Campu��,Fk�asQ i�,�Q��ld �lready be compl�tced l��fure Tri�Ca�1NartYt�aring;it is nat r�camm�nded t��tAppl�Campus�,Plia3e 2 be halted if Trip�ap�xte�detl lt�steacl�f kallin�continsted develo�ament 2�ttd�rawih of the projCeC,istat�l�s�trip�ap �� 1� Lett 83 cont. U�v�lapr�zei�t Aga��rrient f�r Fa�cbaok f,am�us & Cit�r Qf tvl�nl4 P�rk: Farametes: Trip�rtp Penalty; pu�•suc a tri��:a�a penalt��thak is i�vere �naugh t€�Pns�ire c�.��pliar�ce +rfitll t'.ie projer:d��c�•iptio��. ---,th�Ixl� �1p penalt�needs�b�n��akzale�l. Th�pena[ty need�t�hc$�vere en�n��tn �LlStu�e C(�ltlplldn�:�wiih t1��1'�]��C[��5�Y1�}C1Qt7. Tt is im�nrt�iif tn keep iri mind th�t the pe.ryalty is:�ot inte:idcd r�fa�:�� rrve�,u�Uen�rator. �aur��: Ci�,}r�f Men3a Park City�outtcll Mc�tin� �cnruary 1�', �C�1� �t�7ff l��po�##1 Z-��9 .��nda Item #F1 �A�F�I'rL�n�j Lr:li��res tlie�rop�se�penalk�� [faf'n�t at!-ii�vin�c�:e 20'}�,tri p,•et�uetion l7y r.r¢enc� nf tihe�ix-nipiilJt�race�rzr�rad}is t�o hi�li. 5t�ff'beliet�c�thc��P��lty Zevel is�ppra�i•i�te be��use if che pea�alt}�is t�a Zow,ye would be mai�e att�rrda�iie l�pay the pe��all��t�ian tra x•etain C�s[ly TaNJ rneasur�s, S11C}1 ii.s�]�SIIU��SL`FVJt�.'� 11 �JULlCY.:�: i.E��f a�Ol.11lC�lt1 L+I�'�1' C�nt. �.lt�+{.f3;a Yl Cl� IvY��('lll� A9areh 1�,�tli3 �l'ak[ R��r�rL#�,1,��25-��5 Cl�dc��rcriue[Sanisun�] �4gcnd�.[�e:n#5 De�vclo�m�nt Agr��ment fbr r�,�e�aok��AS'�C�nz�rus&. �iY,��]4�Ienln P�rk '1'h� �ara�ns�,� ly':��ap i�:cl�:des�rr�a..xir��u�n c}f�,��0 trip�d ur-i it�the�Ivl�a�a�c �,��€�rl fi•om �:t�D �l.rri. �+�y:t�[f�.m., �,�40 C1'1ps durit�g the F?vI p�alt��rin�l krorn�'U{}�i.m. to�a;I�� p.na.,and 15,�� d�ii�n•ip$. .,.the]�rnje�t S�c�,�s�� hds a�;r��d to dollar ar�c�nnts associated +�vith:�ir�tati�ns oFcne l�ri,��dp. '1'h� penal��am❑un��va�ald F�c S5�1 �rer r.ri�ner dtty f❑r�,�iola[l�r�s ii1 th�ANi pe��j3eriu�, Ph��a�c n�rinsf,n�� clai�y trips. 'f he�erxalty�n.�ould do��ble if 1ti�y tl�:�sholel t��s�he��t�� in tivo ir�n.,Q�irkisYe n�ai�ths ar Ft,x fuui ir�c�:�Chs �.�itk�in an�'�[.x rrt�mtkl p�r:Od. Thc�cnaltv w�uld c�ati ble��ail� if the �}ir�sli��lr] ��ua� exceeded fnr�ix cQr.secu��e mc�r�tl�s. V�hi cles ovcr Tiea 1 '1'icr� '�'ier:f 1:i Lett 83 cont. Tt'i� Gap �aU�le_�: S1Uil,ltri� S2t�tlftrip 1�]L �5,f!��7 510.400 �ZU,s]UU �0� 'h15,a�f�i �3C�,L�t]t� $60,a0� 5�� $'L5,U0�� '�50,��{} $1+�U,0�4 Scrurce: City ofl�ler�ln Farli C:il,�r t;EL,}��OLiX1Gil Mc[,ti�"a April 7.7, �.[3I� StatFl�epoa-t#'1�-Clfi3 f:c�mrnent: 1'ro�os�d App-e f��[?u�2 Veh�cles ocrar Tier 1 '1':�r� 'f�•ip�:a�� 5�,�#rip �?flrip 11 Pe�k Tri�C r��nt cont. 7[?Q ��0(� $30� 3�� $1..5�� 90t� Si�L� $Z,�(]� �1��04 l�evelnpment A�rc�ment f�r F�c�b�vl�/�ES'F�aanpus&Ci��vf Menlo Park '1't��Trip Cap spc�ifie�t�e fallnu�in��'e+�ui�•err�ciils: � Maxix;:um af�,1dp-rips durir�;i'he ATyi Pcalc Feri�d fram 7:�?(}�.rr..to 9:�0 a�.m.; '� Ma�sir:�Um of 1,1�4.ri�as du:�iz�tlje PM Pe�k P�rind Frr�m�:UO a.:��.t4�:07 �.m.; * �Iaximum�f�i,35U�ail��trigs. Sa�wrce: Ciky� �af I�IGii1a'�a��k Plan�°ing Cflmrr,f��ion 1��tin� F�hz'u=.ry'LS,2�l:� 1�t Lett 83 cont. �taff F�eport PG/0�-�5-13 EIR Prv�a�ed A�ti4�a if Tr�ffic�ema��c! 1�a�ia�r��n�n�R�-c�gram is N4t�L�hi�uc� "Ti�e City�p��upel-tin;.�}�•„ould n�ti'y A�p_e if c�ric.��,r bc3th �#�h�AM and PI�#�calt hcyur vchicte rri�a�c}un�s.,�.Appl�v�iould be required t�r�eet��rith thc��ty tn �tc•�l�p a ;ilan��id ide�ttit,�nev�� 7'llM rnc�asu r�s t�be added to ach9e��t�ic ��r:�k trip cnun ts." Gazexa��nts Na t�m� requirern�r�t fflr initial rn�eti�g 5cet7�r�o �1 "If Ap�� da�s nat agree zc implc��nt the�i�y-appr��red TaI�I re��asur��,the�Apple��ald bc:�s�es��d � �y per��y�r tri�r pen�tley....�'Vithin ��,�s�lpp:e wfluld b�3•equii��l lU m��t wi�J� rh��i-y to rc��r�I�iatc azyd idetitii�� Ci��-�pproved n��TI��measures xo he ir:plemented at tl�e p�c�jec:site. Tliis cyGl�w�a[d tcf�i�ir�u�ur.tii��p}�lc�grc:es tn implQr�ex�t�it,��-a�prnv�d TDM mcasrar��.' Cn�im�ent; 12 "6within 5�i d�ys'"of 7 ��ttriCil Appl��r�es tr�im�lem�n��:ity�ippa•oved Ti Di�i[nYeasw��e3" ? �L:L'ClLsi'lU#� „OnCeli�pl�nnt�thc Cityagr�e h�t r]ew'1'Ll[41 rrfcasures,App�e��aulci :mplenzent k}�e$�ti��i��iiri�il d�ys nr r.h�r�Qti��ic<-itio�r d:.:t�:. ...F,t]c�a��s afi�r•��i�ntiuv r7�Gku res are imp'etx�enred.,.��,�ttiare thc c.�f:�i;tivC�l1�� C1�iFl�I1�k��TIJ�� pl�rt." `.lf thP�P�k l�rip_=ccunts ai•c:still ex�eEdec'.,Apple v�avld pa��a t�e+sf�3�c.�r rla}�}��r extr�t�eHi�lc trip shnwn in tlie peak la•:u c:UUfiLs,..." "�1t't�r rhree rnattt��s,�1pE�lc�nrnuld h�r�q.irred ta nieEt�vith tl�e Ci�� u idc°:tity City ad�.il�on�] ��3p2'C7[r2d �7�w Ti�l�i TY't�3s:tt-es�o Us a�ce41." 'I� �'ipple sC[1?is n�t m�ctin�thr. �nal�lu riz��tlie ncxt�,nnual�r��n:t;c�rin�;period, p��i�lEr�s�vould �e cor.tinued r�s h�l��ed lxl�t�l the peak tr;p5�U�nLs�;a�ai is i��t�" Sourcc: t�ppi�C�mpr�s '?Pr�,j��r Ura��;nvirryr�iii�ntal imp,�cL-ite��rt 15 Lett 83 cont. June�012 Pa�e��5 C:�smm�itt: Lnng �a�r��e�a allc�wing cvntinu�d tr�ffyc cnt�gestian No inc�nuue tn�cddres� �.raffi�cuz�gestio� Xn�ignific��tt�cnalty nF�5 or $�per da��vehicle da�p�«�l�y 5uggest€ons: 12 Bs�abli�h 60 da}��race periud mnn9tariag�ft�r 4rcupancy nf ii��i�fic.�nt°I�,of pr�ject cont. 5et tirn�limit for it�it's�l��t1��of cn��rtina/��ple m�etin�ta actually��x:cr.0;as well a� suhs�yuent 1x�°�kings rnstitutc�ignifica�t pexxalt�r aftcr 60-da}�gra��p�ri��l rncrease pen�l�y iT g�als�F'n•aftic dema�x�m�nag�m�rtt�s��t achie�e� RQ��l�prr��nt,Ag�'�ement Fo�r�am�ung Site iF��it��n#'M�untain Vi�w 'The a:�plicaril ��is agre��1 t❑red�_:c�peak��a+�r t�•i�ss h,�f�U p�rcent,..,.' "A�itr_mnnth �r�cc p�riod is prop4se��h�t allows the aRi�aliea�rl Lu adjust lhe TDh1 inetzsures t..� n�eet tiie��7 percent rer.i�irr.m�nt" 13 `'If the�0 percGnt trlp reduc�ion i� nut aet�i�v�t�bv th�end ot the�i�-:nanth gracc p�rioei,rh� a�l,licant sha:]be Im�rl a �cn�ity�f�1Q4.t�� for the tl:'Si 1 per��nt helc�w tl�c 20 pe�•cenC tk�resh�lri,l�ien�5�,(1J L�fioi� each additia��al p�ree:�t balnw r.hc� �D percent threshfll�,° "[']��IP a��icant�b�li�V�S C�1C�7t'0[}fl5�:t�penaJt�� is tc�U}ii�fi, SLa�r'b�li�aes:he p�ik�Jty le��ei is apprUpria4e Er��ause it tlic per_�l�r i�r.nn!n�^f,it��ti�csuld b� :noz'c �a�r'ardable tn pa��the pe:,all.�, than td reta.in castly'f'llivi rn�asuresr such as t�e sh�utt��s�re�ice'' 1� Lett 83 cont. �c�ur�'e: f�itu nr Tviri��ntain�+'�v �iky Co€:nci] ?��Ie�tin� ?�iarc� ly, �.�i� �iCy Coit:�cil��eporC�.�r62�-�$�Clyd�ASTanue (��ns��ng} Pa��9 A��nc1a it�n�#G Peaic H��r Tri�Reducti�n P�nalty A[z�ou�t �{��/� U 1�}��a �1�JU,tJI}G ��4�� ,a�a �a�r.� saoa,a�� 1�°i:� 5�Si1,(�lt[� 15%s S3�7D,��a ........ ,,,,,,,,,..,��,,. 13 �'��, $�,o�[�,noo cont. The TT}h4 pert:�3ty �h:�11 �ie �aicl tcs the Th4A and ,:se�#tc�prc�Anate alternatives tc� �;in�l�-occtipan�}� YL'�'11C�i:LJSC Iii L'I]C ��L'��. �E'��f�{,j'•,��;{,[�]{. (;�}�Q�;'��]�_ Sc;uT4�� iL�:�f Mr�ui�t��.�Lf�e��,� fis�tJin�;:; R��t�r't��7i�r� P�:�mitfcarA��ii:a;is�n 113-1?-R�5:�r-��uy�] �}�ril�6,24�3 P�ge� CQx��ex�f�: �pplc Campus� P�alc]�our'I'ri�Reduct�an Penalt�r A�nnunt 9°la 4� ��/�, no�s�e�ifi�a 7°�4, exeept f'or 6°!a per v�hicle d;ay Tn�i�trific�ne��en�l�y, �P��kTQi'F411��QT1ftil�?��C 1? Lett 83 cont. FStahlist�Trans�ortat'ro❑ li'yana�em�nt As�uc�ati4n Nlceunt�in L'icw "5ti11, !�Sat�ntain 4�'itw's wiLy �oLZ11Cil �as st��tndcd 'a tou�h�i'�1X1�Qn 5�'V��'�l nP��nffiL� [;r'�j�CiS qf��C�, ii�cludi3��arr�pds�l$Frc�m �c�b��[n�,,,, �i�iii��i�ffc Gt��u�rr_s° 5�arce: N�xt 11�: b;�1VaCh�n Dvn�t��-V�liitis�ifi 5ilicc�n 1Fa:]c�� Bt�sincss J�urnal �riarc.t► �,�171:� �'a�;e 17 '''T'hc� ([ti'Iuu:itaiyi Vie��rl cn�ai�.�il sc�i7:��i su��p[�r:iv¢nf nk�,�r �trat��i[:ti Coni:�jne�i�a a�•�cently, �omp_et�d tra.r�sportation sl.u�y�far E�ze F„�a (North 13avshUr��, Tl�o�e ide�s in e!u de a Gr�n��nrtatinn m1na�C2Yl�t�t�55�Gia�iclfY tf��peanc�a�i a de�'�io�:��en:�rf multi-enip_c�yur ii'�.�y�it 14 �y�te�.n,UUOS�ing bike cam:nutii�, <<:zd lt]l.prn�Fin�rnad��ay c.`f.�icrtiy,�7�i��tt�aCh�rs.•. S41irc�: G�r��lc's'fransit�3�idg��:�u�l�t irt C�t�Ilis:� v�r�l��h�n 17ot7��t�•l�'einstein Silicr�r Valley ��iSi�:�ss jc�urnal Ma�ch 29,2d 13 1+�ae 1� "The appiicanthas agre�d to reduce peak h�urtri}3; hy�D pc:rcurx[a��!fr�a Subn�ittet� a TUA� �r��r�zn.-..The nsrtal�le additi4n to �hc Tf�� i��shu':�I�ser��ic�For�mplayees ana the puUlic (T1�'!A)...,Th�c��_:iial:ed ar.ntta:cost of th�sht�f#1e xs:h1 Q[�,-�}��i ts�$��7(1,�1C0:' .`�l�re�pplir.�nr.) �stir.�r�tes that the set-up�o�t for the'1'n�A�=�QUId be��5�,4 b0....�ls�,dny pen�]ties r�latcc�ta et�#orcemen�af tii�; lC� p�rcent h'ip r-�di�cri�n rcquMremtnt would l��p�vv.ble ko the T[�'lA,��fhich the T3��caii ttieii us�l4 f ux'tEier proinr�tc altern�ti�•�s 1:a sin�]a��r.sli�ancy c�ehi��e use in the area}" s{}U�'L'i',: �1��C1f��llilfilll U1C1^l �$ Lett 83 cont. [:ity c:cx�j r,ci_ �9eetin�; �+larch ir�, '?01 i �i ty C4uz�ci�Re�aari:/G35-685 CJyde llvinue{�amsun�] Page 9 8: 1� 1lgCn�j:��tG�#� Nt�n�rt��it Tra�spoz•�t;o�Managemetitllssoc�a�ion fnr Sa msu n�(cnnditinr_crf'apl�rn��al)r��nggle [�rapase�t}tmci �ari��itania Sho��ing A'[all(praposed]. Soi�rce� £ity�of Maun�`n[�i�v�r {:4tyf:r�iynr.il h�lPetir3o hfa�ch 1�, 20�3 City Cou��cil RepQrt 6.1�6�5-t585 �:lyd� Alr�z�ue(Samsung) �.t�aGk�m�nt 7: Ti•affi�I��mand vlanage:nent �'!'I}�� yum mary �,��t511:i ��ci sJpdaLe 3�1b f 13 �.Ll��hitlenl $: MuuryCaitl�ie��Transpc��tatifl:�Nlanagernent�lssociatia� S�mm�� 14 Pr�pasz�l cont. ��gc��d� It€:m �#� Staafarci Max�u��ite shuttl�is a Eree shu.�fL servir�5t��ntc�rd U�7i�Fersit�r�F`�TS C� liS SLl1�Ci1t5,f��culty, ��a:f, a n�Chc gc:nGral public. �11�auCe��z7 Lhe sy�tem�arc frre arid n�aen tn Fh�pul��i�, C�FrrEntlp�, 1�lEn�s i�tin th.r�?u�h th�canl�us 31�.d�7rnu'ld�l'�'�E 1�'an�pc�l L�lir�[i L� Lliti��vr� Ya=� �41t{�CalTrair. sCal��Ya,5l��xiu��il Li��e�� lL�tl��-a�ar�SL�f:�,5tant't�rd�h4pp:l1�Ceni�r,alyd thc San�'intc�ni� SY�r��pin�C:enter. Snu,.�e. �'Ji ki��ed�a �rn�Cy�#llc r�xi�?rv[�o-1��nd shurr[�l�a frce�rivate h•�`�r3��o1'i�',tibi7 servicc, op�n to all tmer��xA�e residei7r:;,s}i��+p�r�s,'fr]51L(7�'��l[la[:�€ipl�y�t•s [af Emerw4'A��L�US1I7�55�5, provir.ed ��w:cr��tiri:le hu�i n e 4se�. 1�] Lett 83 cont. �rnery�C;o-lZfltit�d i$a scrt�i�v c�F thc Em�ryv'.]]c Tr�ns�flrt�l[7�i7 I�`I�I1�g�1Xlent,r'�5sOCl�tii�n,a sl��y-prQ[it argai�ixatian v��I10S�pX'3XXl��I�pUrpr�S�ZS t0]nr.r�a�c�.�c�:c��ar.�� m�bility tor from anc: �t,•ithin E��eryti�_llc-tivtiile�11��'i�tin�C�n�estio�l througl� a}a4r�l'iUri Of�12 S,'�Uttle�ro�rain. T]�T�'� 14 1��1 cont. �6o��artis PiX�Pl�nim�lti[�n �l1F�105 S;�r�r�a; �mer�►Go-Raun€� V��l�site,��wr4i�.�iiterY�uz�aun�l.c�� Lett 83 cont. Nlitig�tio�,. H�usYng City Qf C4p�rt�n�G�n�r�d�l�n �Iousing El�rn�nt �007-�Q7� Pr�grar,n ��: Ja�s�Hou�ii��Balaa��:e Prvgrarr� Eteq�tirc r_��tjar ncj��otfic��:ndu�tri�]de�rel o�ament to h�aild hnt��in��$p�a;t�t neva �1�v�lopz�lenl'proje�t�. �i.s pai'ti Uf tI1Q'C1�V�'��l�J[f]L'il�f't�Vll:Y��rs�ees5, the�i��t�vill �valuate the impaG[ �P aiiy a��:lic�lir�n that t�ill �roduce additiona] �ohs i n rh� eor�munit�T. 7'}le�u3'�3ose of tfle ev�lu�Cl��i�t��G�scrihc th�i�ipact�[�.(kh�nr-w ja bs pn the�it�r s housing str,c;l;,cti��e;.ialiy in r�l�;j�n�'p the io�sfhausinQ rati�in l:lYc Cily�. ��J�10 � 19320 Pruneridge�ivenue 15 M��rley 13rcrthe�•sT.LC�'Saht:�tto Uc�F�lapm�nt�:r��aa:�ies Th��rnjecti�c��nprised af t�vo parcel�totaiin��i.�aGr�s. In Zt3i}S, llie t:ity Cuu�lCil �ppY�Vs�d� Uenera] pl�n.4men�rnent and�oning�:hat�be tc��l�o��v resid�r�tial det�clo�r:��nt at a ri�r7�2ty nf u� CCr l5 CvdC!]]tlg uni�.5 E�tr aL'r�a.t#�li$s�te. �is�al 1mpaLtAiialysi s: lYet f�i;c:��SuC�rlus of�3Z,��15 4�er a:�ililm. Dn N::vcinb�r'I 3, �O175 �it�F�aun�ii ap�rc�t�cd I'rc�i�rid�Q R.�sicl�titi.�! �.vith '13U to•.•��},��ri�s�.�iEi a 1 [U.��7}acre p�irlc. )uly 2�3,Z00� A�ple buys�ro��r�icti .#pril 2�4,2�1�9: li��fe i i4�3csiicl r�r.c�ning th�residenc'al��aer.:�ite f�•c�rrf Piann�d i�esidcnti�l ts7 1'l�nne�] fnclus.r�i;�l a�nu Re51dez1t:al.rclainingth�c�i�ting�+:anne�l reside:,ti�l7�ning. Tha approxini�•.eZy,�n��acrc: �[�rticrn ni th��)r[��^ti�s�n thc nartheast cn►-�i�X �F'L11e s:te that t��as aan ed rnr pu h[ic�arlt..,��vill rctai�i its (Publ i c Qax'1�,'RG�.:c'e:<<L:c��i�YK�crai�in��, 2U(f9: 5i�e movec t�a TiL�•1 Sitos In�rentor�t L�sl fc�r �R�17-��]�1 ii�usin�l.l�met�t{Site��} 5aurc�: Hausin�EEamexll�0�?-�019• 1 Lett 83 cont. i�lty �ol�l]C11 m�cting nn ]iine�fir,�L�i;�1,�Iigend�t ltcm-�1� 10��0 & 1d�d� hlar�h Tant��z Av�nu� Pacif�ic Resaurces De�cla�ir�ei�t �f.14 1c res Propased 1�5 �o��-n hai�cs :�r,� 1.2�3��creP�r•k FeGruar,� �6,2a7 i�1ppl�buys �r��pgrties ZUU�: Sit�rcmnYfed fi�nm �ire fn�,��n:'��}�LfSt foi'�Lti(I��Zf11�ld011�illg Elenl�ilt Sinc�1�3�a� 1U�UU No�t�i T�1�l��t��iv�iuie a�m ownec3 and f�ull�r a�cupied by Apple and :�ave si�nificant tenant impr'o��eme�x5�.lu�d�K 4ver�5,Q00,[�Di�. T:�e t�aliie nF the tenant -m�rErti•�:mcnts a�an��vith the valu�r�r tihc l�irilriin�n��ke it tlr:'.ikel,�khat.�e}�artm enl�: 15 Hn'.�sin� �r►[1 �[�mmun_�,�17evelnnmerll(H�D] �vould ro:�si�er tl�i��•u�eiLy lilc�Iy tit Cont. rcde�:elop in t�3e z��xt Ii�,�cy�+�ars. Sau:��: H�xising t;lement��7i:�'�-20�� ity��:�n�n�il me��it��5r, Ju�»1�5,�i�49f A�en�.z It�r.�#1� 1Q�90 N'o�•th Tan�au A�►ene�� fU n�r�ntiY�ar 17.�2�10 S�l�i id}�7�}, 10��0& 1071� �1€�r� Tar�t�u rlv�n�e Tantau T3uilGin�Ass�ci�tes ��aS; `'VJe 4v�aula pla�� hrin�thESe hau$ing ur�'ts tr�the maelcet as$oQn as pc�s�_hlc:and the�•�by ��ntri��€t�tt3 Cug�i'Cit:o's pt'�gYCSS at Stahi-i�in�the jabs��r�using imhalan��_" 3-�arre � Lett 83 cont. Propos�:d 8� units '?t]i1�1; Sites ma�pate�Yttall��meet rhe I1C:D re�uiren�er�CS fo� b�in�lis�ad�s an availabl�;:-�ausin� SLLG' 17ccc�mtr�r 1:, �{�1 t}�nld l�c�urdiiig't�r tl�c �Ui}� prc�}�c��cci£�eneral F'an Aitl�ndr.-�nt aJ l nt the aEaove�'�rth Tati�=.t��1v�jFUe si��s v,Tere eo��si��r�d as pateritiaf coti4�rsi�n arca fo�^r�sidenti�� u�e��5 unitw j�cr�far#he ivnrt�-�'antau arca, �ity af P�1�R1t�/5zan�4rd H�s�it�l� C�inicS�L�ci11�Ya�D�ar•�i Ghildreei'� Iiospit� 5tanfc�rd prp�«ti��l in�l�d�� a$�3.'1,x�1i11[4]1 CUnt1'ihution to I}alo�,��c�'s al�ardabl� housing p1F�. 15 S:anford's�iee Fresielerit for S4��tiai� Prnjecrts sairl thr arr.nrynr is er�t�i�a I��t tr�tu}��t��z�-proft Cont. ljP�jPIC1}1P.1'L'u'C]UICj �1c��e t�a pay�.._lF�°�t�s�it�tl IS ex�n-�t f'raiai.h�hatls:n�fee� but is t�illin�#o�a�l�Y il an��vav t:►�te1�miti�at� th�E�rnject's i��i�r��s,.,.�llz lui��a''�al aiei�'L ui�erili�;Ls��ui1�11:�im hou�:�s b�^��us�thc;�dan't a��r�. �lt�latxcl �4�hcrc.a�yG hnuscs wraulc[ ha��c�t4 stand.'. Sat�rrt: �ttinft�rci L31�-crs S1�5 M:llion in`i;a�ntntii�i�±�TiPneHts' -ar II�s�`.��a l Ex��rrisi��_� H�r Ge�_��ady Shay«cr Pa�o Ajto Onlinc f iinc.l6,�t}ii�1 In exs��ang�k�r �p�ravino t17�pr�je�t,P:alo�llto uc�otiatcd a develaPment agree�n��t L:t�.��, i:iiluti�s nearly$175 millicrn in ''c:Umrnunii�b�ne:irs"td bc pravid��bS�5�.nfo��tl,,..aT��ut��3,� mtll��n for the ci�•ta usc an h�usi�t�prnj�:�ts. .�ourc�: L:no�7ri1 QKs 5tanf��•d Fins]}il�l ]?xZ�ayisiol� ��Ui�na Sarnu�ls San]ns�l��rc.�iry�Npu�s Junc�,�f}11 � Lett 83 cont. Gi�y af Men�a Park,JFa��book VV��I C�xnpu� Thc ct}ir J�an,��is��clri n�a dc■�einPm�nt agr��n�et�t chal��bllld Spr'll�ut it�lOn;•tea•in d�t�Q�oprnent'i�hts in�xc-:�tii�e far�ublic l�enefi=s. Fac�l�a�k t��tild al��ay a�}�ruxi�ria��l}��$�.� millian to the City's b�loiv-mark°t rate t�ous�n�[vn�. Sd<<rce: ?4I�rc llctaifs�r:�crgc on ��acebnak'.�1L��st�aznpus D�sign By Nal�i�ii DUnalt�-3r�rcinst�in Sil ic on��a lley Busi n��s la urnal Se�ttmh�r Z�3, J�i12 P��e�0 G�tS■��Cupea•tin�J�lppI+� 15 ''...a$�.5 rr�ii3i�n ea:,trlh.�tit�n to atfv�dable hou�ing,the repart said."' cont. 4aurce� Apple Pla�is tn Acld Thousan�ls�f 1uk�� hy 1'�t�r �urr�r.��s�r'Blc�n m}ae�� an �'ran�isco Chroni�le June 6, Zl}1:i '`...��iymcnt ni�a$2.5 r�ni Il:nn �3�In�ti•i��r4tet'li,�-�te [NI1�i1�J c1�171-C�rI�IC'�IOLl5E37n tee. App[��2�ilf b� IJJ�I{ll:a:lll i1C�iIlLllJllal VU�LII1L�lI1�+��.5 1T7J��1{1[7 CQEIt]'I{'U.IQ11 t4�he Ci�,�'�EA�C�pro�ram as ��rt c�r ir.s ir,vestment in publie irn�rav�menrs.�►nd�en�:fitti,•' ��u rce: rcnnomic �a��t3 Fiscal Cir,p�rts GenQr�ted hy A��ale ir�Cu�rer�iiiu l�y ftie}�s�r A��r�t��n�55DG1�1C�5 Pl'Cj�al'CCj {�01`Il�{11C l�i�s�T:�iJ 1:i 1'a�e 1 i3 r'o�tnn�� LU � Lett 83 cont. MYt�gatiou: Pa�•k Envis•onmental Irnpaet: Th�pa•p�p5�d�li•��e�l v��uulcl n:hangc.•thr�ci�signatiarz ofa I.i�acre portiun uF;h�site de��ed�;trk:�nd Op�n�p��,and wn«Id redace the a�re�t�e nf fand desi�ated fnr fut��r�e �ark�s iir i�e E:ity. E�IiLi�;al.iun P+'l��siire�, Th� �ruje{-t�pon��r shall irnplernent an�of hhc f�il��rii��p#��is: �. T►��t ap�7icabie ta�his discussion b, l�gnc�ta�u��:hagc (uxil�ss�other prop�rt��currentl��uwned try �1p�ae is�r��ased),�i�si�nate,dedicate to the Cit��1,1 acr�s elsew�l�a�-�xz�tlx��ity as Pac�ks an[1 Qp�n Spa�c.�,sii�ject�o the �sa�lsf�cd�r�of the�it�,pra�.�zdet�the l�nd u�a�ald he pulalicly RCC�551�7�� ►aurre: �lra R�r�vx�'��Y��e�l�l L��ac�:R�pa�rt�l}�pl��rr�pu�2 ProjsGt C�ty of Cupertin� 16 June�D13 1'age� Tablc li-�.; Surnm�rv af'�A�npacts a�d I�9itigation [►lcasttres frnm EIR C:n m m�n ts: We zve:-�}y�in�tu pruRczr�e tl��t],��..��t'e [af p�lt'c�l.�Yf�31�-�6-f13,#he p�rt vF'�1ith�s vacant(�rarking lot)�rne�et Chc ab�ar�e PLAN-1 b Nlitigation l�i�asure. lt wauld�ls�ur�it��►�ith tlic�alahaxas Creel:Traei. S�e Assesg�r l�fl�'�el APN 31G-OG-�3 and Phnt� ZQn��g Amendrt�e n[�� Rez��t�i�.ting pa1'ksite PIt t4 P[?�1Pj l�e�❑ne exist,u�;vaca�r�Iaie�l�parlung lc}t�a��i�able �art of p�rc�l APN 3i6-�6-[�3�trn�n��P]MP t�suif�ble�anin�for p�rT.c PR l�a�n►ev�r, it is a�nonk p��nl'��4pple has pr�empted thiS��iti��ki�ax��as�dre}ay already s��r�in�; �v,:uns�ru�-t Buildi��g 9 3 vf Tautau Dev�lopm�nt Fhasc�, �ec Fhak� �re�tic�v�y�*,"...�lp�le h�$ rai��l c�n�:erns th�tthe fundai��utal�i��rtiv��f a sti�:ur� s:asri�sus �vuul�i��cumprumised �vxtlx#he pr�vis�on af a publi��il irelen��liat�ly adj�eent za o�•titraugh the pr�j�ct sitc. �e�aus�su�l�a�.•�il,d�peud�g a�its d�sign an[i��s�eiated 1 Lett 83 cont. la�ndseap�n�,may not be carnplet�ly�is[ble#'rom Ch�st•re�C,the passihility 4f unaeithor9x�ri ac�ess inCa rhe�roje�f site may he heighCem.,,. 16 cont. [t��c��ld ctrtai��ly��e clesirable thatApple participat�s in th�eiesegn uf th�Calaba�ds �r�clt Trail to�ddress its conccrns i��an�pc�pari�design, Lett 83 cont. 1�� ;�� " � �U� '��' f ' ;'.0:i�•,s � , „y�y.-'`y • t S ' p`�.r-�y+ -� ��'' " ;y's€nf�.5,t3�--�t",'`� �- c-� Sa:�.:}�.'�: r� �� $ �}� 1 �M _ '.y��b� y�-i�..,,= Y °��..� k• Y� 5 � `~ A�� p•; �;'�b�'.�,�y��l�:..;�L 1 7 �•-~ �.;y�Cllr-"?��; d �� faTl�1 u[ 'l' t� � ,� " a.T'1 . :• pT � J :i I Q lil;d.�'�¢�S." . �'. �11f``�r J +�'F ap��y ,.��'n i��".. ri��]. ., _ � � �, -, �� _Y:�--- - ��.. ..�� ,��. � -�' _s� _ ' �p~ _� � � �`v r-..��.. .��,�tv i�. � ;§r� �? 3 ..�... s� ',4 , � s .} �� E �..,�i. 3 G S — N i �� 1�, � 1 -�''� d �;�� j r r�l �� s �F ' t`s i ��" � � �� a � ` �k .� �.,..�� 1 u � '� � ._.,,�� - � � �x �"�}� '�� - �`. � � x. �� r .� n �•., �, � ,,(r', '�' a a� � 1� r '�� .�a,\ 4 S "�� 't` �`• a'� l � ��a�c. � � f� .6 :.au , �; �'n � � °-�ry`(��pti/�� f °'a� T i l"� ��'T ��J�~ � � Q J � �� '� ��1pG� p�_��;.- ,t& ``� u � y +r f `'- � 16 i - r '°'"`- r � �� I a `'�� . � cont. � s r vl � �i �1� � :� F;,a� +,� � . �� I �� g .v � J � -� •��c�.�, �r s ^ '=t-r- - r� Z ,,� �, c ��o-f : ��.- sr-•• tFl `I a �, a''"�-Y � �� r <, , Q � j � c� � �,_ �7I �� r f r.� / ` � � � �,•.,_'�i.�� r c i � �I � y r. � (� �' vC ° f � rr � . •r , n � f s" � �4cl�.;A;- �jr:f, `�y � f z �� 5�4� 4�` � ' � d7 1 + _ $'.� ca'I "-t 7 �- � 1 ti �' �; , t r � 4 � Q� '.� c, :.r�--,:�;. � � 4 ! ',�s r` ° ti r �� lro � W �'.x y3� R �f �' U S �' � 5 3 �J �J �u '9 �S q � � �� ^ �� I S� 4 - �. � ,F f. 8�a °� 4 rl Fc i ry - � c°� �i. � �.ti fl�h 1'i `y� � r,'f .� ..�I a y r'L ��f� G � '='t •Yl�3 . �. •• : r .. -.�....ti _ �. i�.. �+�,i� � ��':7 �f�'Y4:1 . -f '"��'%,:.";.tt: : "�..-i-��Y . -- .ry•�.; - ._�;z�?�' -.ar:+f�� ,�;'�`�=;`?'r:�� u::�.:,:: - •y r �;- h • �i� :: : + :9 :�' �•i::' ^ ' ;- '� :'i�..` F�y'i» ° . ._� _ .. ` _ ..-.. ��5� _�: iY••.' . =; ':r .' -� �v:��' . : ��"�. �� . �P�' �' •� �T �Y � - 'yi'([°. .r�- ' - �� ' �' {�+�,�. .Frf� - �Yy, ��c�. - - , _ �•c' - -��,4*� '�' .a - _-3'r:.. '-'�` f� �' e,� :..i .ia� .. �R•' . - �,� _ ,- - ' 'r.a s �;k�� y; -�;_•�` "� i�, 'f�'`-'.. -f ,:,:;• �. _ �: , �,. i.:'= ��<sY• _ i:1t �, ` � .' '� r = f;t`e•`':�:r':- �� . � �:,: a..� . �-,�= — ;�= 4 . .b;;�.�w�=�•�;,..,„i�:=:�'�.s. ,�.: :i r4�-: �r�'• '� _ ''r•..p : " _':� F�i�1�;��. ''��-.�r •-. -x:x � � �� ,. .��.�•:f.��i;s��,?`�r-��.� - . , r: '�,. . � �;. r.'� :•;i�� :�i!,.��e.. - �" �' • �. � ��• • .�: ; ++� r� :''�.•i:1��.}' 4 ' '+:•�-• - =� �_t �:r�.'t:�, 4 ,.�idj:` - - ..r • . '�,i►�.Y t;��l',`}:'��R"� r.e,�'- e ' ,H�, •,,�.�.. � .��.e -•r' rF�4• -.. • .4�• - ��v-r• ...t� •..',- � ' -•- • .:�+r.y.; ,� =!� -�'• _ ' _.s-. .k x��. � .. '�^. -'��..� '. ::_ ' . .,,:::.. :-�:Y ' '"� - , : • ;�.�,• , .�?n T�,i�, f, ,•�:....^ • _�.s�. :.._ i '��_.. ,* • ��;:. -'`�x %Y _ '� _}�� f' �. 'k'. . :': . ,�ti. •�"•,�••: • :.:•;�i..�1��:::.:�. ;. . , a��. � ; Y'•- - -s°�'te� �: .� �_ ��;��k � .••. � �- ..� • .. . • ' ,.�� ,.3._ �i � - r�.-�.��, _ ,.."• . . _ ...-. ''S ':'� :w.�f. _- ... _ . • -_ r`y.i;•'„?'{ -� , . _ ' � �� .,. . ��'�;:�• ,,.:?�;:i� • .. >a r= �� . :. - .: .-•t t•,VSf�' �� '�•..._,�`i��.;� +�� 4; . y ..i,', ..''�;�' �.� ;� �� ' • ..�'r 'S'• — _• -- • - .- - t. �. , i�<�5�.; � ' _ .� - '_- - �'�' . - �``-� . �? .,,t .�:� � ' ' ,bf''•�� L� � �v i ��'�r�-y�� }�� ': - ' .: . .k+i; •}�'�1eyd1r9��'.. '��! � z� fr'�a�Y. `� ;� ' : �_' -��': •' .x_i: � . . .�.;�: : i.�•_••, '��•�• .=•• .a�.' -- r� .:�ar'�• �; - ,. =r•• '. ''k rt° � '�. � _ •"r'� • i c •,� ••'r. - -;�'i.� • . - . w :?�.. i:�:�:�_ �;,,.�, y ' �� • �� ' ' . • _• _ ' . , ; .d.. ' . : _ ��. _ r�' .i�. i •�i, �r •.'fi��• ,�/'c�;�r,. ' � •� ,+y!'`��}r , I �S �1� Y:i L.. �y_�� 1. yf" �A. FT� .% :•:. . ,.��J '_�•��Ar ;..-� �.. Vf'_ ' • �`+!„ y�, �t �j�.,. � .� V1:' � �� .�.fL�3? �1 ...� i3� �f��.�' .. ..y•�� Sy�r�f�'. �k" -_ • . .,+; ��,. . �9•:,"� . _.. -. . ' ' ' �"'yik - � r;. ' . , - ;r _ _ . : , . ¢;.. .�:, �, �' ,.�;� .,•- � _ - ; - �- := ,`-'`:.=' , , ,'f• �y�r_'• �.. �r • ��. � ��.��l: �x• •,-7. 1 _ � �� _�' r,F'` . _ � � ' _ '-- •,�' ._�•,.^i� .�.. �,'. �y*- 'T,'' ',� 4' . •,,. . . ' ,'�Y'3 '•'��'-- �y~4..+R. ..� "� :.� . ' - �I-�. r,; •. . ' " s� �'"'rwi... _, .- ;N�:. . � _ ,.cy.� _ :f� ,.�- .. .�f - � � � .,. � _ `,��i�i•�-'��_ �.:� - u• .� • • :. a'• ��•,.•-c- . . :ti ,._ :�;• ' _ " " ' - . - ';^.1w �� .Y.�.i. .3-=.�_ , •`E' . . . . . . . . .' , '��",'w - _ '��%''��M'.e. '.��!�_ � e ~` J ' i •� :� i� lY ��rr 7� � . X t -.. . _- _�'' '� +''?'••'�a�, , .�`�p:� ,' _'!. � .. v. ti�: . . ._ - � - �-- . • i- ., ..t •�'11�y+-��-r:9�y� w �,'.: , : •�.. 1 , �, ,Y:s��w. r_�,�� _ 5, '�-i '?' :+�:�.. i .�.-. --. . . '.S.",�',. _�.. �� `��:1 i,��.� `,.�LL' • , . •1 '. -, . .. ;. ,� } R_'",•. !. �i•; � . ...�.. r=.. ��.� .:4: .r ;.�'..._�� l ,'�- - �. . � - _; : � . _ . . �� . �vf. t_.,r�-•=�L.`�' -� � '►- :�e� '�r� .i , '��' i:�- '��Y�_ . ;��"�;•'•��;�„�;� _..FS,'" :y s • .-i�.�Y`]" �. ... ._ g, '� • - •�7: �1 .::., i. '' - -� _. .��'`S °�o-, ' " T-��_ '.�3-- -.ti -.:y: � �, ...- - .. �+ .. �., -�� J:�Z.3-'•tiM.�w' • �.�,�� ?��'�'y?.3 r ' • _ ,+y" �� . _ S+ '��;.`.�. _ _ • � .�� ,t�:' . �d.. � • -�!'�:� � -" . _ '- U' - � �"++:.�.�.'`.' 'M+:e�,F ��' -F. •i•��vG'�"�=r�� '-. 'i'_ '•i�-.. " -c 'f:.. � . '{' .. �:� . �e , �A, - - J•.t'. �4 ., .�" ..�y.,�.�_ .ss7+:�- r+ • � : . : ., _,� _�,.' � i w' •� ' ::'s„ }' i_• ;�' � g� �`..: �� . - '+. � .`y `:�-. .. ��.�. ��'�' .N- � t� .��• '7:��y��'� 7�"' ;�• .� -. .. �+ -�•,y��y''t� '�n, 'r. r �.V"�•' ��j°..i�•�' �_�•^w, � . '" , �S� vF�•1 4'. l'..L �? . :�� y _S__�_ ��i`y�— ' _ . �� 1 • � �3' � �.ti� '�. '��=�� .y? - . �y�' : ,a _ � �{=�.�z�1 - �� .��• �f ,�� ', . - �.. - ..1oT _ +q;• -.:,-_?�. FJ,-��.si-'{.t,,��• -x� 1 .. . _•_v. 1 , '�,' - :• `�. .• }%_ __ i �: •_ y'L�y`�' �,�+„�'�'-;•'.,`;�L i:'- ' ']�°'' rar �. -. -t.�-r�" 'Y`��:t. N :'. � _ ' �' ''!'.. ' '�_� -.� ;�:��- ', ` .;i , . �F�'.. sA,',{�i . _ .V��h,1�� 1 4� Cr�i! •j �� , � _ ,'.�.4:;�� S': •��n� ° �& �i -�S� • `� PI '�- - ,,� r _ -a' : ,?��,is� '�''n • � .,��.� �.„. . .s: �. k '.� �•�,�,tir ,y�lf' �y. .ti��F�. 4�.�'y�': 1�� _ei�fk�i��w � ,5:. . - ' -.c: �, �.�,�x S�•, t�^,-��. � � s��Aty�•� �rir`"�-•'d.�;, a i •'}7y'r..-�'7g'' `��. •1f�°.- �:��'3`�ti ' �ti . - ,�.^. _ +�_7'. ��. ��`,�r'�' '�i �°` :� -- .��- - J:'��''.t4��.- • . :.,, ,:?;,: • . . •;�L� `�••7:�.��y•�•�i^e;�. s" , :;-s �� '�' r�'�' '��1,��'}i �4'ti9.'�'�s��5r'k�I �yq• . '�z�:t'��-. _=�• y - �i'��,.��S� .. '• _ .:e�:.r'. • ;.: �- �' - -�"'�=� _ ..� �r ''�...'t - .-. . _ _ a ti� - ;"+.' '�, a •t.�• - _i � • - .:��.. -- � .�)- .,r f i�.6 � ' �. . ,. �N�:se. .�-_'�• i�.� s 'i � � -� 9'4 '•:•�i:,_'y-F. :. r.•}fF� 'y�- �ti,'� :N,_ NFtH,!e�.r�• '�.Y ' vrn.i,*�,. x�, �„� 1i, r � ��-N-.�.ir 7�i .�f Frq y � .. , , •Y,. i�^ ' :� . �'',w i. Y} l~ .�•';;�f'� ' �#�_' '=_.� .: ; "''�f!.: �lN.p.�{L_ p � in'� ',�.� �f�'�-f1`'�/ " • _ ' ��] �F.. � . °li' : ..�i:f�f 1 .. �. t.;r.�:•.�' .I' -_ - ;J�'�: . . . , _., 'r,.. ,r: - '� !�y,j`,y� � ��.':- . . ' • - rr:: ' �. _...� •1i. ��r r'�,�ry.'�:r••,:;" _��, • - •��:, =7Ce�� r�:,iJ.?_=L%� ._`l�� :au��°•ti h . . -�� _ , r. 'k�'' '��. ._.. ;,�. r.�� ,� '"' �r..R,r�'-��;��.. �.c..�, , .��' ', �;'' - .,. }'��:�:�� .; -�';_ �� ,�•��.�f . . , ... . -+r�� : . � :.: ,;:� _ :. - - - . _,..��....°:: ,�(qr°-:'�k�'��;.� �tt;.°.,.,. -,�rlti' �'' �.��€r .�.._, ' ' •��^;Y1 ""-,@' ��!ai e'�'' +�. ..i�'' �n:_Y ,�yY :�� c.-y} , � 4�'e- �r r i-ti '�.' , '�''`'I', - ., . �r �",1 �s`. .,r, . � .` � _ '�`¢''' ��?' } '"�:ar•t! '•L•�w�: .,1�y•,L'^--e� -- F 3:r_ '"� . :�� _ ��rFb r ' _q ,�,.'Y, _ ' : _ __ ��ia�R$ .- f' °��j;l le�'`g'�i�'_�T� , . ..:. .`.�r . �.• ,.ly i? s' :::rGR�� .�+F'�1+'<`, ui1�+w'• I � ` �v�;'. 2'a�i• ' � . : .-'.., _ _ y' ��." �'� �nl•�..' •.i, .a*��a i. - �� •X"-�?s.d•c?Rp��Y''[`pS'_ •. . . :!' '�'iy- '.�ri. -- � rv,W •�x'f . Y s 1 cv2� ��.Sy! ..�j� - . ' 4-�.J.w ".'.!� ;�.. � - ; t :�' h _. �E;.:�e�lj; �t' �,.- ro�l�q�g,y ,��±�'^• � '2;fi • • _ „ iy�� ;. ��4' y :?�r• .��F ti :rTF "'•'��•�i is# '�}��t� - s� �'�'�4. �'�•�yao- :�� `:x�: x y, _ ,3.• {r' .Y � ��•', `�i 1 ,� !!i E. '� -} ��t i Z � • � , � '�'_�L.a y� ` •'��_ •e•.� _ �7C��y��..s.� ;o�: � cy ��rj�'::_,-•; :3d.��-.."..t. .�. � .�; S: �+��.:�s�_�i: .. • ��• �x �ti+�L��w 1, f � 4�ir .��a rk• '�*c: :.ti.. +`' = tarM'= °' _. _ __- �r - . °•.�?::�f'1'_ '�� r_ ' c.. � "N�0:..'�Y: °�`:.y� : - '�� _ _ __�r '�'�. __:- --�r'r..:Y��_F_. �°� i i•a� �L�.�,��. �- s�e�+� �-��•-p�_ r4��!+:" .�'rr.7`��•. •tiy ':�. . _ .i..,,. '��' y'�.��. :�:Q , :',�� =� �, -: - ,__r��: -: . - ._ - - = �� . _ - , _�... � _ -- - - - -- - �� `�� . ., ;� � - .�� . �� .��,.-0.�'__ _ �` •1:�:�'�• •�� Li'�,��:''+� "a�' '�i,y ..s... _ -.•�'• '!• . _ _ _ .� i, S•��`k... Yo' � `'[.ti� • - .�"'�,k�.• `�:i,y�a'-�Y`- ��' 'r. .. ��. - 'i' .. .N. - y�• _ _ .. ,,�'�x^"'�`•�...- 7 - �' _ • . . � ' _ ��l� [ �. ,y 3 J`, y .; , iM1:' . �� •• _ . � _ �. ��i�;�•'. ", , _ 1-'j,` . e ��'t a `-;�r r 'r � - -, _ i;'�.'� _ : . _ . - �.^;'� , 'z+�-��'�ro� v' . • ' ` e ' .•,�y�,�?a:"�'i,' - -- -� :ee; _e r�':� . ri4 r.�.ir. � � M1 .•.� • ?+,��.. . .-.;f.�:: , _ - ,3- � �, �� }'..'�T.�•:f:�'�'�4-a i fu_. ' .s ` ir�.�.,�.��'..�. T - , � . . . 1��. i f ' ! ' <��. «� .A.' ' � _ . , - � ^�yJ. a��, 'x�r:��• -' "lr�,' ��`�': , y�'�. :• ; ' • - - ' ?' ;�,:�.. '� �.�.�' '�.� ..y._�r. Lett 83 cont. �iscal imp��t Ana�ysis Camm�n C: �►h[ fMOE�P�rV1]EI�iT �I�CA� rkllaAGT Ah1ALY�1S SH�UL� aE C�h151D�R�D IIrC Tk-aNfi �.�IYIF��I�[l�lE�'1+1'T IIdIPA�T �EI�'QIaT' B��A�IS�YYE �T`ICiP�TE T6'-1AT`�'H� �17'Y �vl�L„.,qppRT A STAT�IVIF�{7��'�VEi�RI[31MG G�I�[SIDERATI�fti[S, FlN��l1iG TH'A'i"'THE EC41Y[�MIG 'hl'ALUL C7F 7'Fi� F'RC].�EC`i', AS PR�$Ef�[TED Ii,[ 'TM� R.�FORT "EC[3hl[�[►�IC AfrID FiSCA� IN1PA�.'T� GEMER�►T'L[] 6Y A,pPL� 2N �UPERTlh[a � �URRE,I�1T F�4Ci�,1"t7��AND APPLE��►i+'IFUS �" B'Y'THE KEIF�� 1�R57�I11 ASS+�GIJ�.Tl�S 1P�tBPAREi� F'{7R APPL�, Dl1'TVSfEIC�HS �iGI�IIFI�ANIT►4hTQ UI'+f,��iC�I13�k3LE I]+�IPAGTS IN THE DRAFT Eh[ViR�[�MEi�TAL [MPAGT [�E.PQRT. A IMDEPEI►i�ENT FIS��L, I14�11p,�1,GT AMALYS[S (F1�1' � llfi'�LL PRQVIDE INF�E�MAT101�[ TI-��T V4�ILL IE+lF�R�1+1 THE ��lll+}CIL.ALCiMC�'�'IT!-i T'[-I� �N Vl�OI�IM�NTA� IMIE'�.�T R�F'�FYT �E�R�, I�ugL,lC G��l+�l�[r[T�IVD aTHEI� 1MF�RlNATIQ�I�L S�UF�GES, SU�H �APPLE'� Fi�. 17 T`HEFlE 15 N�7 I'M[]EP'�N C�L�N7 FI��,q,L 1MP�►�T}�lNJ�,LV`S15 �F ,�PPi.E �Arv1PU� � [�t GUPEFrT�Nt]. THE T�N� �F'APPL�'� �CQ[�G3�iC .��[D F[SCAiL 1MPlL.�T��E[tiIER�TED HY APP�,� 1�1 �UP�RTINQ REPdF�?T B'Y FCEYS�R MARST�I� f$ �J�4��' QPTII�[�TI�; F{��'6�V fE�+�R, TH� R�P�RT fv��I+IT[dtdl'S ��UI�RIMG AIeII�IUAt ]�ROP�RTY T� ��NLll�,�Ti 4 "L�CAL��GI-f�E]LS". �T D��S N�T MEiVTIp[y.T'1-fAT T�IE AN'h7T�.4L F�F�lQPERTY T�?�R��ENC�� FR�M PAi�C�F...APl1[ ��-aO�'�4�A�, 7HE SITE OF �4PPLE GAMPLl9 ,2 1�11AI1� �UILL�I��, a$ hJQ"y" �►d.,�..{�CATE1� �"C'a CURE,RT�FyQ $�[-��L Gt�`P'RT�T�S CIJPEF�T[MO �]I�1lDN ��E��r1�I�T{�RY, �F�E�fOh]"r`U[�liQ1�1 HTC'aH SCHOOL, F4DTHILI� D� �lti[Z}�►�C}l�NIL�IVI�TY COf_LE�E, T[-f➢8 W�ULD E�IE, �F INT.Er1�E9Y'TO T�-i� ��❑��-r� vF �upE�rir�o L11V��R'TH� TE,RNiS bF p►71��C Sl-I�i�1NG AGREEM�hTT gE"T1�I�EE{I TH� CY7`Y �F CURERTIMD Af+Q�I�FxPLE, APPLE f�E^��i'4��,5 APPR4�€[iwIATELY �O°�o-C1�TT��lTY'� Al�[N�!}�.L SJ-]AR� UF�ALC� 'TAX RE�F1+dL1�� 7 Lett 83 cont. G�Fi��'�� C}.E,MERAT�D B�["TFi��U�►�IPAi+IY, a��'T'u�►L�Y REC�1V��S'( THE �ITY€?F �U PEF�TTIN+D ir'�TF�i[�[-[ l5 1�� F 7`�l'E $.�,5°�a SALEg TA�. THE �A��5'Tk7€A{�1�EEMEMT ITd TI-kE FURM QF THE C�N�I]l�T[MC� AGREEMLI�T ''a�HEE?�JLED TCy��PIRE 1N N1+�R�1-� �Q 1 A;'r��arv�►�,�rsi� J►�BUTir[�S 17 I� IE�T�3`�E�E,d I�►L COhi51Lf�R�,T1ON a�',�,.�7�1I�i.,C�PME�+IT AC�REE[VIENT �ETi V4PE.��4 �P�L� ANi]'TFi� �ITY 4F CUPER7`Ih10. TH�s ��l�l'�'lioll.f�.'TT�IV dF"i'HIB RE�ENUE �41�F�C.� M�Y e E CahiTIA[C3�NT Q�1 .��F'LE�Itiia THE�i'T`f dF' Ci.aP�iF�1�lO Y�EC�[�TI�'PI1�Ci A MlJ'Tll�►LLY �►C�EPTA�1��D�,i�ELOPMEE�T,�4�REE�++IENT. A.QP�,� h�A�ELE�T �AT lT3 g�LE Dl9�RL'T'yL�N� 7'O �ES1G1�E4TE TH�E GI'�'Y QF �4aP�RTfNa AS THE P�I�'"�" �F �.t4LE FC�F� APPL,�'S PI:RCE-��SE C)F I`�� {7YYA`! PT��DUCTS ��R ITS ��hl US�, Ahl❑ F�1�pURC!-[.t#$ES FR�M�UT-�F�SALE�Y�N o�RS. FGR PuRP�9 ES 4�`THI� �i�GA� 1MF�A�TAIdIALYS]�, IT HA9 �3�EN ,�15��1.p141E,� 7`HA7 Ar'PLE �LEG'TS TO QESI�sI'+IATE�H�,�ITY ��LIPERTIMO,4.9 T'HE P41NT�F 5�1�,� �R 7a-iE,�� uS�T�RE1fE�1l��5� iNI CONS[RER�•T1dN OF�E}�f,fEL�P'i,��,l+jT 17 A�REEMEM'x' a�T1f�€E,E,N A�PL� �4 f*3a TFiE GlTY�F��1P�R'r1 MC1. TH�R��OR�, jT i�AB�UIVIE� THAT THE �1']"Y�F �I�P�R"1'IhID if�►lLL cont. RET.�,.1 N��Q�o ��T�-1.��'Ll�E TA3�RE1,�Ef+IUES. F'{�R TH15 Fl�3C,�,L I[�P�aC'r �4NAL��IS. �1PP1..� �O�i�[17�R5 7[-I�$ U�R„ TAJC RF�'VENLl ES AS `°4LD �C�V�NLTE,�?? lN THE" C�MT�7{�i �F THE DEFLI�fETlG2� �� MEY4►�RE'1d'EMIJ�'� �N 1TS �C�I•l��7'1l�iG A�`aREEM�i*IT l+�l7k�'�'H��1TY 4F�UP�RTi�r+lfl, Q�1�Tl1dl� C�T�I9TRUC'T10f�1—�2ELATEa F�EYENV�i5 CONT_1N�EI+IT fJ I�Ohi APPLE �h]D THE, GITY DF' �uF��F�`TIN� F+CE��T'[AT[NC�A MUTU,�LL,Y A,�CE��'T�B1.�, �EVEL4PME1�7�GF��IVY�hi'T. ",� ��5�1��IM�PP,�'T AMALY�fJ�S AN E�M�N+�TION aF THE FitE�E�+IU�S, G�STS, AI�Ip F�S��►f�SAE.AtrICE {RE1fE1*IUES Ml[^11�s CQS'7'�} AS$�C[ATEg VVFTH F�L]BL[C �GEI�fGY A�Tt1�IT3L,S. TT Pl��71I��7��A i�EA�!�N�gLE PL�A,N1`►IiNG-LEVEL E,�TlM�►�E �F F15�AL IMRACTS, CJ��U4 R�i� �..�4'I"iCIPAT'II;IG �TNETHER�r, PRaJ��T` Viri�E. PA�f lTS�VS�'N W�eY ��1ti1�Rs�'1'E � Lett 83 cont. SE�FtF'LUS R�'y`EIVUES TI,IaT GAN �� C�SEQ BY A�ITY T� i�riF'Ff� 5 R�T[C�S f�R� N R�T oE,�I�IT�Tl°iAT V4fILL R.E U1RE A C1Tl�T� R EDUCE �ERIIICE� [�R FIMI� �FFSETTIlrl� ��'Ll�CES_dF'l�l.yNDS." SC�l1RC�; MUKV�r� �t,�S$QCIATE,S�ROP��AL'�'O PF2�PAR� Flb'{;A� IPVIPACT ►B►MALYSI� ��FAC�gc�o�G�+��U�lN N1ENL..� PAi��{F�RTHE Gi'r'r a� pVIEML�P�4F21{ .Ju�vE�49 f �A� HAS E�iT�M�1l�E, �p�F�iEI�C�.4$��I��TF{�Fl�G,4L.1I�+IPAGTS Af�f.] E�G}MC]tr]f� 1MPACT��F PRE}POSEQ 1�iE;N DE1��L�PMlE'fri'1", A9 W�LL A�.hS51ST[N� LDG.�L��'Ll��l*�[:�I�M`!'� TO l*1��QTie4�'E_F�C�R_GC�l+!IM'U1ViT'1' E3.�1+l�sFl7ra F'RD[+A FR�PrJ'SED i�]EIfV DE�Y�LC)P�4'IE,1\l'F. THE �,h[�LYSTS �f1LL ALSO 1NCLl.3GE ]I�F'�]RNfA7`I�P•I�h] THE'4f►�.LU� d7F O"THEF�3 Pa'i'ENT[.hL PUBLIC 6LN��'17"$`�'p BE PHRF4�t�+IED,.. S�IJ FiC�: BAlr AR�A� ��MOM[�S PR4P��4L 7'� F�R�R,4RE FlSCAL fMPA�"r' 17 ANAL,Y'`al'�J dF F,s.��gpQl��,p�I�;J� [M N�ENL�pARK FpUFi l'HE C1TY flF C011t. ME]+ILO PARK .lUNE�, ?�1 '� Fr�opert�Tax Cupe[L�rit�Urii�i7 Fre�ant Unian i=rrn#hill �avArca Central Fir� h�Iid-Feninsula Regioizal Cuprrtina 5an`.tary Lilarary S�rtt�z Clr.r�.�allcy �4l��itlei�L: Pai•icl APN 31�i-fl7-4J4�,th� 1ve�tSan�F Apple �ampus� 3 Lett 83 cont. M�i�t guildin�and Fit�i�ss CenYer iM�14T iTi Cu�rert�nn llnic��t, Freman[ [�ni4n,�nd Eoai.hill S�ho�l di�tri��. As�u�h, �h�� sc�oal-disb•icts receive no�rap�r��+ tax fra�n tht�part Qfr#pple Caro�us:�. U#iii�p I�s�r Tax: 2.44[l�f� ��i�o��-3z f`Y��12•i� r�� c��.�-�:� Fv �n��-�� :ctual fim�ndeci Estitr�ale �-o�osccl 3,�64,$�1� 3,3��[�t�U :�,143,C�[1f] 3,2�3,0�� "'�,pp1�p�i� a�prUxiina��l.��S�b{a,Q�OQ in utility us��r t�ixes t�i'h��it�i� t�1��,..j�+c cst��nat��i fuiure tiltilit��taxes based on th�;�s5u�nptian r1�at Ap�le Caz��us �will incs�r��•ati s��U:ll3�sirt e�ti��y �:f�i��nc��;1�n �nd e�uipm�iic. Given this, :t is cx�c�:t�d�Y:ae thc a��ra��energy�ca��s��m�sric�n p�r e�n�alny�L�t�'iII C�2Cl�lt�. rq:'�SUrposes af this t�ru�tl;rsi�,1"�']$�1S911'iT1P.fI r�1r1C t}1{'. 3yCl'oge c��lsurn�tion for employ��es hr�usetl��t1�r�le�6��7�pus 2 tiuill be 20t'�o]ess than the��fera�e 17 conS��m�r;�n t�r ��nni�3��es at c�;rren��u�e�rtin�� f.�ciliti�s," cont. St�ur��: �c;ut�ur:ii�zzl� �'i��al lmpacts Gei:�i'�l�e�'.l�y'�.pp�e in C�ipertinr� bv I�e�fs�j�M�rston.'lssoicates prepar'�d f�r A,��l� Ma�: ?413 ['age�7 Apple C�m�us 2 13ru�iuce�,�ipr�l 2Q13 l0U';k� kenel+vahle E-neCgY Tkze 13uilGii7g��ill be po[�Feret�ei°:irel��{}�1'CCICYtr�ltl]k,'P.[1�1'�. MlICI1 n�T.}115 L''.'T1C��T}�WI..}7C p�'�vid�d by or.&1t�fuel �:��ls an�!p�ir�LcavUll�lics. A��1��a�npus 'L Pt'oject Qescri�liuri A�rEI L013 Pa��1� Th�: projLc�s ave�all e:�er��nc�ds 3vi!1 be��'Q�rid�d '�v r�n��vable:eriet'�y, Tti2 tza�jr�rity ��1u}3��enerat�d ��n-site thrau�h�h� usc n��ht�t�vollaics �nd ruel c�[ls ti��ith �ir��tecl � Lett 83 cont. I7i�n<3S� These w�ill be suppleni�:ted �y�ric �urc:�a��:d :-en��hle c�n er�v xFzl�eded c�uraiig pe1'i�ds c�f pe�lc dr_ma-�d. V�ill this af£e�t the amaunt vf utility tax? 5�1��Tax ",..the l�ass Q�'tt�•o nf our knZ�kltree sales Lah pruciu��rs in Fl` �3-�A� i�pxc�j��tec!to result in an $°/u�'��lsi�:li�ia i�1 sG1GS lax cvmpFred tQ FY 2�112��.3 yL�r-�nd prr�jection. This las� u�'iIl n:11V maica the �it�►2t7DT�t'Cll�rii d`�4nC Sin�l�ma�nr tax��rnrl>>{�gr,��ma�Q 11S:71Ut'C vlllne:'ah[e kr it�hu��n�ss��nl�tifit�•_" "Th�R4ard of Equalizatf�n �Nf7T] 's Ghallen�in�the�+aay sat�s t�� hacl �r�vinusly h��n rc�nrt�t�1�3��nP �,f o�ir rop salzs t:tx gc-�erators. tE"tne T�QT det:er�niz�es that the saiLs�a��s r�parted i�npro:iez�ly,lt�4LlIEf 1'�SUIL 111 f.I'1L'{.lf�}�be€n�req u 9rec� t.�p1y back�+1�.6 milli�r�1� �arior yeai,t sal�s taxes ir_:�cldit'on ta at�y�subscqucn�C rc�rcnucs �ccci��cd frnrn t1Ti�r.nm�a�ny" SUl[l'C•�: 2013-2D14 T3ilda2t 17 CiLy uf C�pertinca Cont. Fa�e�3 � �� ",�1pp]� -getler:�t�d City salcs t�x rcvr:�,ucs �sir��rom caF�ter7� s��le� ar� ex�r�rt�d r.n r•Prn�tii�� C[7�S�i nt„ So�r�e; �?caii�mic and �iscal lmp��t�[;�n�rt�ted bv Applc in �:t�perL:nc� by i�cyser;Uiarstati�issociate� J'x�cparcd tor Ap��fe h�ay 2Q1� Tahle 1� P't�nti��:t�!� "Uixr Iar��$r teclt co::�pani�s E�n��iii��,tli��irs� lhUUSancls �af ne+�■�t�ork�rs,at�d�oardin�e��a1r lae��[7��25 4��Ca5�1." "�k r.1�e s��nne timr,our l��al Gnmmunities��nd��uern�7ie7its a»e f'i�Filii�;la l�c�;p Lheir n�4.�ls �hove:is�� w��rs,��€tLiii�ba�lc s�n��r�rie�s,s1a�Y�in�er.zpl��.�ees, �lca��r�,;librari�s." 5 Lett 83 cont. „But�iart c}f.��a e�onamic�t•arnise af�:�ese bi�,:om�,a�ii�s:�ihai Lh�. lh�u�a:rcls�f eiii�layees thcp bring��ll mo�e thr4ug��their to11F:�s, 5�7{I7(�IiT�T tY]417��r OY:CQfFL�,Zt]°als and�:iothes, tivriict�i7i tut n�eiyeratcs more s�lrs t�xes f�r tt�ca�tnw•ns." "Ytt the eani}��ses accti��ieti hy�m�ny nf the 1�.r�Ls�COt31pa[11E5 GaXI�AS[�h�[:[��ne i�lan�ls Lhal ��r��n ern��lot�cc's�v��y nee�d. Source: Fa�cbool:Lau�c��'F��ebucl4s't�{�cL Erri�lu,}f��s ia T,ike I4ie�7]a Park MerLltairts 1.7y i'��riF{?'firian 5an Josc�uf er�rv��t^rs [Vd�embet�17,2Q1Z "�pplc Inc.i�k�tiildin�anotl�er phaee to feed its i��'lqn��f�m;-fli�yee�," °...�aCc�;ria ex�lusiv�ly tar AppJe��varlccrs:' �'"rI�IL'rS�IIrjT� IS LS3 ULll.�cY�rvo-�tor3�, e�;:f�t�ria-�tyl�f�cilit��ta �Ccommr�dzi.e eniployL'E�S l'V�LU 17 vrork octt of the cni°7pany's uarir�iES s�tellii'p hiiil�liii�s alnng Tiandle��Drit�c�:n tli��trest side Cont. of' N.I)�An7a �+�ul�va��l,� "A��1�alre�[�y I�a� tit��cm�lt�y��e•dedica��c cafes,plus raugrl�v a do�tn �m�lj�r c�7t�s Ch�t offel'�,Tr2l��art� �go br�al�f�sl�]nd lux��h Qph�'-�s. In ad�(ition,the�omp<�n�r 13 WUT'�tll?g r�n add inh�no11�c�c�feteri�t�t the R��ult�'ay cdr:�pus triT uF$ubk� Ro�dr- :' Sot�rc�- �pples�yes New 11,4G�3-Sq�3arg-T'r,nt�:afe by�4alL�+Vils�atl Cup�rtino Coi�rier Nay�,Zf1I� Gamments� �nme rsf th��ppl��mpl4yees�robably patronized restaurants in the Cro}sraa� area, See Diagratn See hlevvsp�p�r ELreicl� �uu�c�: Ealei'�?S Can't�oinpct�.��vith 4��b�e's�r�� i'an;l 6 Lett 83 cont. Il�r�alliE;l�E�01� Voiee of I�faanGain 1�iew l��arch 1&,2�12 �['a'Y�JF GUp�C�fifV�D&APPL.� A��eEr��rrr�crrx�an�sU�,�rxrior�s�r�c�s Ju�,�r �,2,Ud7'ra J u r,tl��..�{7'[� 3�v1Df+lTli �?�'g'�iy�lON JLfLY l.2O 12 TO S��T'�MB�Ft i 8, 2,C112� �h10N'Y'}-{EXTEhISy�N��RTENi6�R �SS�09 2 TO��6RL'ARY '�9�,�{�� I YlEAR EXTETISI�M F��BRIlI�R1'�Q,,�p'[�TO FEBRL'A�'S'' 7 9,�o r�. EK'[`EN31QN UA{DE�E�DE�fLI.C�RMENT�1CR��,M�MT F�BFtUAF�Y�{7,2�'I�4 TO? ...IULY�7,E�7� ��R Sr�'r��e�R �8,�4'[2�rrr�nu�Ci1�ih+1�ET1N�; '��k1�1YE.A CS3NCERi�t AF�"E�REVT�N111VG TN� APpL�C�1�13U�.TATloh7 A�R��MLF�T$e TH� 17 ��VELCIF"h1�IVl'A�l7�,�ME�T B�TViTEE[�['il-C�Cf7Y O�P.4�.0 ALTO ANd��`'C'ANr�RD H4SF'xTAL ANi7 C011t. C�ihl1CS Al�ia 9f'H�T�Rlvt SFiE,ET 6ETy1fEEh3'rF7��I'T'Y U�'ME,ML.Q PARfC ANG FA��Oi4: 'fH� ��56IBiL[TY T�[A7 TH�SA��s/us��TA7�GENERATED BY THL GONSTfiUCTfON OF�4,PPLE CAAAPU� �IWAV��GNfF1CAFJTLS��+�RE�48E TH�.4M4u1VT aF l4EY�FVVE T`o'PHE�'�TY FROnR�►�P�,.E S,rtLE6 TA]C DRJE'"f'D'i'HE DFFfNE710h1 QF�IELY L�C,A.L�ALreS TA}f'��]+�UE. F�,g�u��r a,�fl 1� FoR F��{�ARY�'u, �O y r3�lT1F�C71JNG11.IbiEET[3�[fs: V�/�NA�f�A C�NCEF�N A�'T'ER 1��1I1�►N[TICx TH�I�PPLE�ON$lJL"�'qTI�N�Gk?�EME�iT& Ihl'SICMT �OlVSULTATl�l+1�►GRCEl►7ETIT dlJ�1'�'�Y-{�,p1FFERCNC�Thl TFiL� D�F'�NITI�N[7F h3�vt►C,�CAL.SALE,s 7d�}C i�cVENUC IN YFE�2 AGRE�M�N'CS. 5. ��,Frw iTiorrs e:I1IE.'�Y L.4C11Y.SQ��S 7A]f R�VEM1lU�� M�AI�fS T�TAL SALES AI�t� 115�TA?[�AID B'f APPLE,�]YHfCH 15 ACTUALLY RECEIVED 9Y C]TY, dS CJil.�UL,l4T�D 1�DR EA,CW FISCAL Qi.lAFt7'ER, �Ih1E7S TH� $AL�9 TAX FR�Ni APPRE'S CQkIP'AMY�T'�R�LOCA7�'�A$QF THE DhT�4F'Ct-I!8 AGEP�EM�,1�CI' Ol+l�PPL��$ RgeL}C�MPiJ$1]�T["I�GITY�F GU#��RTIF�iO AND T4[111lUE U5S Tl�K C]H PCi�iCHAS@S 6Y APPL�, IN EA�N►�ASE�ALC�ILATE��14 Ti�E QUAR'iER�Fl ql1E,ST10P7." Lett 83 cont. ��P�IMEM7: .JI)LY 9,��7 3 FE']R CQNSIL7ERATf47N DF PROPOSEa SF�LES'�6�,�ICf D£YELOPM��IT ACzR��M�IV7 lti0'3'E 7F�AT'"f"QTtll.5A1.�S ANO TJSE T.�{F'AED HY,Ri�PL�WHiCFi I$AC�F`ll.4L1_�'R�G�IVE� BY �1TY" [5 AT l4ATE LJ F �°�o� U�E T�X QI�[F'U�CNR�I"c,5 BY Al�F}LE�AFy BE AT F2,A7E �F B.6`�590. 7't-i 16�D�►PF}L�BROCI�IJ RE t.]uAl�,2D 7 3 "}�P�� C}�L,1VEF2ED�J�$ k1ll..Ll�M 1M T,47'i R�YE�1�[UE TP TH�CI`;Y}N ZO1.�,VIlI-IiCI-1 C�1JLI� If+ICRE.4.SE TC��L 3 MILL,fbhl WITI-[�4PP�E�AMPUS 2 IF THE CkTY AND APPLE�7�TElV17 C[JRRE,hiTBAIL.�57�47C AGFtEEME,MTB "ClMD�Fi`fHE T�RMS OF A TAX S�A��NCx AC7F�E�l4IEh]T SET�II�EEM 7H��ITY O�'�llF'ERT€1'�[�ANL� APPL�, A�P°L�REC"�]YE6 APPRO?Cl1�ilA7�C.Y 5Q°la aF T1i�CC7'Y'S A�M1iri1LT.4L SHA�OF SAL.E5`�A7i l��eVEN[A�5 QaR�C�I'LY d�[dERATEZ] BY76iF CC3MRANY. THE CITY SALE�TA}(FIGUF2�F3 P1��5�3'+,C7'�17 [[�Z"(-�j$R�PQR7 ARE}d�T QF TH�PAYMEhiTS 7`Ca APF'L.�. �LYl�iou[3H rHl�Ab�tEEM£NT IS 17 f3�1-�E,OLIL,ED SCHEDULEA T��]4P'!R�1TI��f�r THE AIVALYSfS AS�UM�� I'i�$ E�f'T�NDED[hlTb TIiE C011t. �'C)IZES�EASL� FLfTL+'R�, IH��1V5]L7�RATIC7N�}F A DEi��LOPh7�[V�AG�+EEI��FJT �ETIN�ENI�PF'L,E Ja W D CU P�RTIi�[Ci.�� SOUR�E: EG��1�tv1fC AN�FI�CAL 1MPA�TFa d�`s�f.l�Z�ATEO BY APPLE 1N�UPERTIRlO �'y�Eygg}�1y�ARSTaM A9SOCIATES PREPaFP�D Fi�R A1yPLE �w�x�a�3 �aaTr[aT� 9 5 P.�� 'i 5 +`1T 16 APPLE'S I1tii7�RP12E'TAT]�7N THA'�XWE LS�`�'A}L I�E.YEIdlIES ARE C�NBIQ�RED"OLD i��YElVU�" IJNO�R THE Pk�OVfS1�NS OF TNE S1#��TAX SFIAR[)+IC�A�RE�MEIVT,rhMCl AR�T'FiU�hIOT SEJBJfCT TQ SHf4.F�lN�1N]Tl-1 AP�LE." "�OR PU�PQSES OR TH1S DRAr�F7 AIHALYSIS.[T HAS Hk��l ASSC1M�p`E'�-11�T APPL.�ELECTS TO QESIG�AT��l]1�EFtT[Na AS TFf�PDChTT�F SAC.�AIVA THA7 1�O�'a C7F TH�S�CUfaRE,H7 AMa FUTIJRE SI}�C1F[C USE 7A7C FiE�Y�l�3U�5 AR RETe4lN[Eg BY THE�17Y. THIS REVE�IUF�OUF�C� IS G�NTINGENT F3 Lett 83 cont. DIH APPLE ATl�CUPE}3'r'[NO N�GOT[ATINr3,��1u7"uAL[,l��i,CCEPTAEi€.E dEVELpPF��h]7' A,sfiE Ei19 E.'f�fT,.,,, SgURCE: ECON�MEC J4f+�b FISCAL,1h�1PACT5 C.,ENERAT�J] �}(APPLE y�l��1PE�R7'[I�[O 3Y ECEYS€!2 MARSTdt�!A�SaCIATE^� PREPAFtED Fi7F2�►PP'�� MAY�Gi3 F��2?` Go�n n��r�T�: "APPL�IS��N510�RIl�G(A7 1T5 S�YLE DI$C;R�'Xk�I�l�TO D�SIGNATE�UPFRTIhEQ A^a THE PQIhIT�F SAL,� F�]R'�H��E USE'CAX R�Y�TVl1ES.'' "1T[S APPLE'5 I).i7'�RPRETATIQN..." Ti-I� PNRASE "��1�k91DI�FiE�7 pL,D REVEt�[ElE" �S b�8A7eABI,..� R�F'�REC�I��is'�o S+aL�s T.+�x 5��tv�+r.r�RE�M�I�fi. IT ia rvv'r '•�,�.1.E�T.��c��x�� 17 lblr';�RF'�:t+dElV7'�: IT�l�4� BEEIV A.1+� '`��FiTEEME1v"f'F'E]R CO�SUX.T'A7`lCN S�fiUI�CES.'' cont. THERE Iv1�iY BE $�y�Fi.qi FQT�l`1TIAf�AR�RS FOI� Cti1�F41YT[iYG CI�TEI�PR�TiOf�QF T�F�IvI�. Cvnstr��tian Tax�s &F��s ��: ��a��M��,4ND F1S�AL IMPA:.'TS��h[ERA'PEI?BY APIP�E I�i CUPERTIri€[7 KCE1°SER MARS`f'[7hi ASS�CIA'TE� PR��1�r�E��'�3R APPI.,E Il�1C. A+IAY�O�� °'IT IS E$'i"IM1AT£a TF�AT MATERIAL,� PIJRGi-IAS�D FbR'r'NE CCiiYST'3�IJCTfOfV ❑F APPL,�CAi�iPll9�, VIfILL YIELD$13.� MILLIQhI QIF'SALE�f�i'SF"T'A7C��Y�1r][J�TO CUPTcRY[h[C)�5 GEt+I�rZAL FUNL7.'T!i!� RE16Eis�U��bllF�Cf�l�COIV7'11VG�N'C CJPQi�[AFFL��A➢tii] GUP�RTLiVU fi1�G�T:/�LTIPJG A ML77u,��.I�Y RGf:EPTkgL.E��Y�L�I�M�NT ACtR��MEhIT UNDER i�FfICk1�PF'L�V1'C}LJLD dIRE�'T�7$ � Lett 83 cont. CQIVTRAC:TQF25 T�QESICshIAT�:�UR�RTfIW4 A�THE P019VT�F SAL�F�F2 Ct?1+1$T�[JCTIOhl iti7 A7E R[ALS.r� Co1NivI�MT: THE STRI�[F�FtA Pv1�D[C,4L��FV`1'�fd ExP�ltd�lON FR�aE�Tl�i7'`�4F PA�.4�4L7o AMD THE FAC��O�YC l�R4J��'T!-Ih��LGFZ�EC�TO'T'I-�a��1�UVSoDia. ::A17C71TIOFIALLY,�PPLE V1ri��.P�r,��pR4xir�,a'i`�LY$7 4.��IILLION 4F"�Oh1�TRUGTi[Y�]TA?i:' "f'�TH��I`PY PURSIJAAiI'7'O�'HAR`f'�R�.32 4�'Y3'{E�ITY'$[4IUh11G]PAL�OQ�.'� C�laiMBIVT: �OEVgTR[F�TIQI�i'FA7[E�AFi�G�ST R�C�'V�RY "FOR CONSTRLiGTIOiv 4'F APPLE GAM�US 2.�►PPF..�YltaU-,�L,Sp P�Y AQPROJtIMATELY ��.� MTLLl�N Ihl C#)P�tSTF�U�T[4i�[F'��$7D FUND Bll[Lblh[C3 PEFlMi[T PROCES�I]'+[G�d5T5," C4NIfr]EI�fT: C�7NSTF2L�CT'l�N�'��S AR�CO$T REGOVERY. TI-I�APPLiCAF1T IS REC�U]R�D 7a �AY PLANNlh4�3'ERi+'F��'��S TD FLIC,LY C�V�R TFiE CdST�F S'i AF�Tih1� SP£IV7 4�11 YHE Ft�VI�VV��'THE PAQJEG'T. 17 "TFiE CETY W[J-.�R�CRl1fT AN AS''aDCl�l'4'E PLANhlER ANd ASSDCIr�TE ENGINEEFt T0 VEC�RK�M THE C011t. PRt?J�GT� 'T'�-IE JUB5 LiYCLL 9E AQ�iER`P1BE�AS TtND�Y�AR PD�IT[OF1S." "T}�!E BUDs�ET AQJUSTMEFiT!S FOR$2��,$�4£TOTAL. BOTFi Pp��TIC7M5 WILL SE 5ALAF�YED ANa 1NCLUD�`��N�PIYS. Ihl AbDITIDNr�Mj�aR r37AFFINCi 1NCT"�E.ASiE l�IAS AQD�I7 TQ 7H�CI'�Y �TTOi�NEY'S OFFIC�,�S?R7I-I�'7��Y�AR P�R10�1_ed 50L�R.��: G1Tl'OF�ICIAlB AGAIhfG AdIdRE 5`f'AFF F�Fi AAPLE'9 N�VY�,�lS4PCiS PROJECT sY M�LTT WIL��N �UPERTI�IQ COURI�k� J ULY 13, �4'!� P��E 1 CO]�l1vfE,IVT: AM10L1NT 15��9$,845^E. "�+S�HEREAS,�PORT3�f�1�F THE GDM[MUMf'T'Y D�V�LCYPriIIEh[T DEPRRTMEMT BUD.�aET F�R P`ISCA�. YEAR ZO 1 3•'201�L BifC?�E7 IlY�OLVES "PASS^T7-?ROUGI-I" REL+E�+[uES PAIO Tv TH�Ci'rY 7-o G�YEFt TH�CQSTS FOFt 1AARI�US CQhi31]LTAhI'I'S NE��D�D QN 7NE ARPL��.M€P[JS 2 PR�JECT,YfrH��1-� H.4YE BEETI lhICL.UO�D!iV THE HUI?CaET T'�PROVIQ��'RAF�15�'AREhICY AN�ACC4US+►Y1s�Siu7Y." 10 Lett 83 cont. SECTlb:d �: �"HAT P4R.TIQIV OF'TFi� P�AT�ihIlNO APID COMMUHI7Y�EYE��PM�NT C7�PAR7"1�IE,NT"6ULfGEf��R F'15GAL Y'�Ari�,09 3��0��L REFI,�CTfhIC�FASB•'L`WF2Di1GH REVEFIU�3 P�.10 TO THE CiTY TO CDVER C�NSVLTAiVT Ah[D EXP�R`C CPSTS Assb�I�e7�,6 YSIITH TEFE A3PPLF �ANJPU9�PF�Q��C"f,..." SOi1RC�: HESOLlJTlO[�I #T3�Q�5'1 �]7Y o��l]1-EF7TThIb CITY CO Li I+1GiL NIEETIhlG G�1 7 l 9 3 �OMh1�NT: An+tauNi'iS$�A5,�OQ. ;UU�IGATIp�M��4SUR�fi ii�"��wEY�R�T}{E (OIV�RAMP��JF'F'-l�AMP I�i7�RSECTIOIV 1S I1L1IB�l�CALTRAT�S�IlhZ15C�1C1"1fSN. TFi�42EFbR�,�FEITHER i HE,PRD.]EL.I"�PCHSDFt hI4R THE�IYY�F'Ci.JP�.KTINO GAN �iti[SUR�,TH� 1MPLEM��1iTAT;Dn[CF'77-i�PRDPQS�D M"sT1GI.lTlpN M1EAS[SR�9;TC-111B THE€IvlPAC�'T 1S G�MSFDERiE� SICa1�11FiCAP1T AIVD UIdAiJ�1L).4BL.�. �U) 17 SOU�'ie�lE: AF'F='�.,�,CAMF'i15^� PF[U1�G'C 1�l7AF7 F.h�1VTi2DIVML�'1dTAL 1M�+x.C7 REPORT C011t. JLl[�lE ��P PAGE�84 "I�GALTF2AAlS[7C7�� NC)T.R�PPRDVE IMPt��]v�M�,N7'�VW17H6�I 5 YEAR�FR�M,..DEVELAPN4EN7 AG@2EE[u4Eh[T EFFECT]YE�D�'1"�,ANiL3 TH�APPLTCA[�1T I3EMpN3TRAI��S TN+4T I'�'Ff.49 YV�R�C�a p]Lt��N7LY 7C]Pll]4S11'E CILL.TRANS APPRaHAL YO THE S�TLSFACTIQIV OF'THE P�lS�tC VYC7RIifi l�1REC7f3R, INi CiIS�Fi£R S4T..,�Qf$GRE71Df�1,7H�N THE APP��CAhlT SHALL BE R��IE;IEO bF Fa�SPOlW516LLTT1f TO C�hISTFtUCT ThiE iMFROVEFI�NT A)�ID THE BOhlG 5F�L4,LI-.e��.�ASEC)E1Y 7H� G1TY AF��R rki�.A1PF'L��Y SUHMITS FUNDS �QLJAL TD THE UPDATE�ia ESTIMA'F��dNS'FRUC7'10 C4St 7Q TH�GITY. THE�I;'f M,4,v Lls�7H�Fur�as �a�o'rr��'r`Rk�t+��POkTAYIOhI fMPt3D'1��M E1�fT'S,.�." ai't?C1F�CE: C4hlaITI�IVIIL L�EVEC.��)1'1��I'i'PIERNfIT FDR FACF;EiC3�K Vf]��l"�,4hiF'i.1S �ITY C}�ME3VL0 PARIt i�+[��t�x 28,��t 3 �ra�nrn�ntr= CO�T OF PR�AO��o wiITlaATIVN n1E�.SUR�S S�iOULD ht�t B�COhL31t��'R�O N�7 thCO�i�YO THE�L1R'. 11 Lett 83 cont. "...$�6 Ni1LLl81+1�F P3JBL[C IMPk?t7VEMEFITS T��BuILT A.R�uND 7H�CFsMPUS AAI�]I�[THE CfTY OF'CUPERT[fi[0..,.THE,S�IM1ICL,UF.]E�.�]O.�MILLION�F RQlln►lllAY.7F2AF'F'lC, iN75,Ft5EC!'f[31y, L�1+ILl5CAPE ANI7 UTIL,ITY IMPR�VEl�TET�T$, $1 0 NfIL.LIQPV c3F B1C1fCL� �I�lg PEIIESTFtiAhl FlaGELTffE,S,�4'r�.7 NEILLI04V Ihi PARK LAf�[D....lh]AC1QITlO1V 7d TI-3ESE,DNE�+f]ME G.APi7AL 1NVES7MEh1TS, APPLE YVfLL,AAfh]LJAt,LY SP�,M1tp$3F"a M[LL]�AI ON A 7F21�MSPORTRTIaN n�MA,N❑ MAMAG$M�NT FROC3RAM,... 17 9auRC�: ECON4r�n�C ar�o FSS��T�lnn�+aGTS��1�i�l�A7ED BYAPPLE[[�l CLfP�R7iNO C011t. 6Y K�YS�l� MAr`�STOF!A55C]CfAT�$ P REP,ScRELi F4}Z APPLE 1'VrAY�d 9� CU141HlEN7: TH�SE FlJCJI]S AF2�C057 rJF'PvE171GA'C'1C1hT 7'O�4DC7f2�S$'X'kl�TRAFFlC IMPAGT t�F APPI�� GAMPU3 2 AND 7i-f� LOSS�F PARI{L.AhE� Lett 83 cont. �iEt::..-GSP Il�F'i'I'I1Y'±r�'.jEVd°�^h'sr��a;�,^!a�9.20_l2 �,s7�r�r fras� ,�y-�!1= ��r��, � � Zkr T'.me5 vm:��a I�:il;?.�'PfP'� -s`t'j �`$i' �w .�`•e� u� AscoanEs�:L�lt�t•1 u�:ir1 ir�-�bi�L �i� � . i[YlU';_ls's�?---T.FC}1111qL]�e L:1�7tiCSi7g i1'1[iL' �}1�15 1 N �1 f`� �Q i 3�g .r L'��' 7L,�` twi1:�Y!i[u.i�.Li'r• f� [7F �•�� ;C.f,�.��'i1�°C�L�".'R-?kCsl��iCY.I'.I,f1t1ll x��CiiSl'��?"- ��r _ �. y �.'1�,��ifllr7lG.1'�13ll°Vl3��7�:'�a� <•�:: �"�;�%�'".,u; ..�.t�t-., . ��"' ;iic[11[n'[�laa]rt A{ap32'?4v:;ts':.Yt ?; " .��`',a '�.�'�}• -p _ i��h r�l:?�A.�nk'��{iy�t�. � 4 "3."5� " {��$�Zr ,s i ,G:�`�, L 1P `�7.tY1':�ii�l��['- �1�:7F:� •��, lmo�-_ecl�er LauL'•4 rl.�cn7�u�°- :t�t�av si}h�:�ijtur�f�°�°k'hi}�] . ph.��r'7.C��..4�le!��Q�J-�ii.,f5ll�1. �'� 9 � a I 1:N ur.rlCZ8i�J1[T�N'htiLt!n: �nr:irs .��.�:��':�5 �r��C':� ��.�-�a rc��zi�r-��a«:�i t4��w �c;lr:ers. }�� .�:��.�r��: f�� ,<<€:a�,:,��,��.t�_ _s . . �lIK y��F.�1:1T1�f�hFi;ll7�;9'R}lk('}1-Efl�y: 3- � + . �, �p7l�u_:}1#:}U.1�J�1C:Fi'��'41�V�F-. ��.�- .��.��,��' ��o tir�t' ��.��.h��o+;��:a w�a��:,r�,� 1.��•,�er be.tL�lit.tli:�'enn:��:irom x 5+��k[a:'l'^�`?�:�7�r�'Pimer �rrr_;a�l�cyl�er�pers�iEz2, c�i�l a p'a,-�:ucr:l�s-L wP�]iEa:!an r?C,uif�r�,i�ila:isl�b�41 s]�E:'r?�er�:�-Crr.lr�}�Y�L�ie s•U_ec+nf "?7p�iC1'+2:F 8�ii�k�u rcaaed�re 4•}A^pt.a�ic a�r.lrr r;j.3�?C?�.r�tt �.�SUi I'-'arr.i:�irT�Irl�iuz�i�.:C�i.c C:n1L�e T':Zs:�1ic L3i•:iuf.h�y,�p�}� 1�2f�rE'ie ur;k tr c�I)r:1 i.vn,jnU in +-tiL;.�c•i;lrr.p ar��s a-ar��'c�:;�rr w 'L�tJ�,A�ft?�;n YAB�x��rg��iR gtiu- �in n��'r��le. �1;::,1a lut�sux,m�:mor�L�vplval -'4�Uxp.]�.�8��ti•:�µ'iF:'a f;�x��nli- in F�ci'•.il:is.ln�}:xt sei�fir-;h e o�as ^:eH- k.hi��n ec�ii,u��aese_.7=;ie de- 9hr pci�f�etsvice nftnitragr`n•r S:C1L-`G FiF,]�eex-ii`�;']io k+il'.'E�tir�n�:;' :h�'1'i:a�:.: lc,re�r-•:a�_�'iTT(]�IYCvlelLl4'UP�!i: I'�i.8?�t':1d�Y'StxtY!i Ch•rt;lpple ��vl'�;i;cr;3i�;in(iirrlrip�prn:�li�, I cj3:r;:teso:Ytkc-p:uClrvu::v�:I �;,....,,: et{�ivaLisir.� �n:�r:��me^e�.!y,tver'imrnf.l rr� �••.;r . � �I' c.L�aa7L� l.l� Ln:�: �r�r Gf'AC�C�mmlxnil:: p "'' ur.r�alxnd �.. � ,. . � 1g �.,. y:," t C11F�rps hF.'d�:'L.�k.�s.ud ma�e '' �`'�� hC��1F�1"t'.t G=[ l::�c�ma•i�,rmk�lir.,?r_u6�rx_,=h��. �,r�.,r. ; y�s};� evee-rprr�� r.ze hri�,{in�1:;�a�:��-a;u��+:si�r ;�i�} atAipie 1-xs �ul v�orT�. I..:: , ,— a c��u�c:C;�o�z �^��rr HF,��ri n��.�:�e a�,�;. �s�m$-��I¢w t'[il.:i;l�l;- ..__ '�ht:�c�lsu3z Tiatotle 13ti;�t'?n.�rn�i�•na;l o� ��iin in�:ir 9.�W��a.ic:nT�h'tt�'.:I1'�l:l'php`i�f3l&f. cUO[.'1'lieirr mna��I Ks e�'iasYt�� t�tnp�i;iss�lke�,cpu�hake��n ncr;-.77'�C?i.:ri��e�ast it ct�;-s> i �nm-a,anri ltir_y-lk�::,iu,��r•c�-�. �a�':�r Pr�:si A�ke. I 'I're•�:�xl-L.�:�;n°rr•_;1;��;1aE lie "F�I.?}i��_l�tiy do t^.�:yr�:itlp; i."�k,1+r�?:'ir�+„.xe8.1'��lw�e t:eYz L�_e}�c:an#n��.a+.�xH f�w+,��es:is l>ilNrenL-.�t ii:a�:ridine s c�xn �431k?1C;"i]r to:dtll�'j'ttY?3s, 1:��r.v�F�:�i F�uar r eziu��i�:��r.is hXu:�,r,;r•3•�ev:fr:��a�:iN �i�L:[YIk�L't'�"- lsµly g�L-_i En�rc=_�zc',ian.lte.w�� [!�.�:��.�ri::�?kn:t��v9ia'll t�Js;. �'��Cet�itF:.�i th}p�N��ir.,nf L�n:i'�;�ii��;�4�•.i�ereiQj3,1�Y.ra k�ilic:�n3FC.�ir[�fl�`e•e:uire�rit.�:r.• 'i;ll dc�iinAa,�s•sn�i��lr.r'�a'�_ ,_ -- r:aNax-�re^'tFU rlr•.H-,741�EuL',Y�ntBttt'�r�?o�i ' '�t: :::iit;�ti•.: s �xvu.-rt{;nCs'nv]nhl�?ii;.t8 l•u ti�d r: '.;.ti_- ; �z:�a.�T h-af iu��,i�t��4�lilL} te�i:hed hirr,;tli� 'lr,'�nr�t:�;.tli�ii:��y��ku.�ti '�° , r ril��r-heirE�{'�� {11!CU'.xf.�l�x si•3tstr},4RaxE. ` � y_e�r•i�ldl�'r�i- �4k'aF)�l:y."'��t-ACi��?l�?�h.k?p�,5 Fs` �, t�4lll v7:[�.l�::i' i�:��x�L�i�e;;:�}i;t�,RSk;r{nies�rx��: �y �iz�.i[�7[��:r_v:s��i. �ia�nrh pav,�r rind�nfl•,;anr!a t;+�:}i u±',:ti;�snr� ��dL Ihr�-�nr7j�C�+�'t4[+:.�e La� ��uYpfl� t��>>r:rt:�r!K;�!��? �c'E?3I:16li3i•��l:li�ri'.Et.]iC_7R.'. t:�ln�'1•.�o-�r� .� Bally-furtren�.l?+Ei�x:chp�' ru��i"rc�.t�suq- 6fu��AEyp-c F�c�arir�rdr�v ir:u�l: M•'•:�::n�;thaLh_�;l:s:�a�kae'u;I�1r p]��C:]GLIL.�,uuti�nudrn•rr]u�i4 ��zrir�i arr_Ji..1L�`_�'h'1lli"}1d:Y�f �1A.pIG:�4d R6]T 8tty pPL�piu.�ur. rC8[�,'i3 l�acl.dm.tm. �s•o a:3are�•'��Lk htu phy'0': `�Tkp rFS;��:l�s�iuu�:•r.hia rai�irU`hc�har��ue�tidn:�'[�7u'if. lcer.dol':r',s wlicv�hrr�aldt€:e �AUj7�1�:t�t�hapak�lic�hil�-rre �tN'r i.��r.?�'>;x'iI Iv1i:rl�`.��'1`n �:;leG:,i i�? tL^Ce1�C1'?�n;a r��iy�o 1�C 1�7r:�a:- :�l'.a=,�4'ir.•r.t]'.riFES�tiR:�s f�rir�g. {�a�i1rcCi.70C�1Ci1�'rlari:� �_.^ s,�x�`�.uu;.�l�c�::�.ih sp�ral,"lt'�n�t' Gt o,�ta�:nid�me'r:arj!��ic��,�rt�r�¢. �3l>�nt��rii�l�a y;:.Fiie:que en��r�a�rl- Lett 83 cont. �'�a�i�n� F�G�� a�xxc�k�� 'Fa��ucl�s' t� �et ern��,� �� ,�.1�� ll��nlo Fa�k. �n�rcl�ant� �y �hr�s O'�rlen M�r�6�ry N�yi►s CpIlIrl7rlfSt i•�ci .l- . - l;1'f�_ :�i'� �.i•!:.�''.:..�1 �°l'=1 !":�; UpcfaL�d: 1�/17�2�1� C1�:1�:37 PM ?S� '�'oi� s�� it�II 2��rass Sili�on Vall�y. ��r largest tecr�vmpai7ies b�oFnFn�, h iring thousan�� o�new�vflrk�rs, and f��r�irit� ever�arger pile5 ofi ca�h. At the same tim�, �ur Jaeal �ammuniti�s ar�d �o�r�rnrri�nf,�are fighting ta k��p their heads a�ave�sca!r�at�rs, �utting faack o;;sen�iae�s, slas�iing err7p�oy�e�, cl4sing f:�raries, �'Jitf� this dlscar�n�ct�r��ing, it's heen heartenir�g �o s�e th� v+ray Faa��oc,k has �mbraced i1� role in its r�ev+r horrieta��n �f Menio Park, Ti�e 12�t�st exam�le �f Fa�aboak's laudable efFort� to ir7cr�ase it�1pG�l ��n�mi� im�a�t arrives after ThanKsg�vina with a new pr�gr�m th� 18 company is launehin� call�� "Faaet�u�ks." cont. Faceka��k �lans to dist�ik�ute F'acebu�ks, ssser�ti�liy$�5 �ift cards, fa�rrt�alaye�s t� use at designated l�cal merchants i�n �Qwntawn h�enlo Park. 11}1Fiile it's still Uncertain just h�o,�v much finan�ial im�act F�c��ucks u+ill hav�, the sym��i� irr7portanr,e is huge. !t's a gaad idsa. and I applaud them�Iol�� It,"s8id Menlo �ar� May�r Kirst�n }£�i,h. "Thi� klnd �f C�mmltrl'1�C�t is&�IS� unususl. 1+�le'r� v�ry fortianate ta have them here_" The Facebucks pragra�n ti�as v,rriften int4 a larger��eEoprnertt ag��rn�nt the �nmpany sig�ed vwith the city af Ar1enlo R�rk ��rl�er Yhis y�ar ir7 �xchange Far bein� �llovr�d to employ mQre peopl��r it5 ��mpu$than the pre�v�aus occ�ipant, �un Micrasyst�rr3s. Faa�ba�k �gr�ed ta �ay million�af d�llars t� make up the ctrfferer�cs��twe�n lh� s�l�s taxes Sun g�nera#��i, ar�� the fower amourrt af tax�s Fa�ebaak is prvjected t�cr�ate. This is a camrr�on rr�ispercepti�n: th�tjust by lan�ii7g a I�ig empl��r like�'acehao�C, a tov�rn'� Goffers uvEll fili �witl�n�v� t�x r�v�rru�s� �fthai were#rue, Sili�on l�alley'�local g�v�rr�ments �rr�uld be Cn� m�at prosp�raus on the planet, Inst�sd, toa often, they g� b�gging. Rart a�th� issue is th�t the stat� �f�alifiornia�nly levies aales taxes ar� physical�oods s�ld, not virtual anes. As aur lives ha�e ��ome m4�e di�it�l, and as bookstores ai7d r�c�r�s ��ores Lett 83 cont. hav�$hut�red, loc�l gavernment�have takerj hits. Sun, becaus� it�old s$rv�rs, �en�r�ted big sal�s tax r�v�nue, pa�`af which went t❑ M�nlv Park. By comparison, c�rr�pani�$ like�ac�ba�k c�en�rate little�r na safes taxes an th�a�s th�y s�ll_ R�ther than�r�ring fo�uck r�s�onsibili•`.y, vr sqU��e 1�1er�la Fark for Qfher ir�centives, Faceboak aF��d t�pay millians �v�r the next d�cac��ta mak��p t}��di�fe��nCe in s�lss tar. cvliectiorl�. But part of th� ecor�arrtic R�Qmi�e�f thes� �ig Corr��anies i�t�iat khe thc�u�an�is�f ernployees they bring will move t�raug� �h�ir#�wns, spending mfln�y an r.nffee, m��ls an� cl�thes, vr�i�h i€ �urr� ge��ra,te more s�kes taxes'�or 9acal town�. Y�t th�c2��n�us�s accupied by man�+ o�the IargeS#cottlpani�5 Can al�� be�ame islands that �ater ta an a�nplay��`s ev�ry r��d. �`�la�y�m�ioye�s�rfho taice th�train to IUI�nlo P�rk th�rr hap a��ard a shut�le�I�at takss them tQ F�C�k�o�k's 17eadquarters. �dhy joum�y three milas to�awrlta+Nr. M�nla l�ar�c U�h�n ther�'s f��e coffee an �arripug? ��Wh�n we m�+��d ta �+��nl�P�rk, t�ur�rn�lsayees h��en ��r�r f�mili�r with da��rhtptivn Pala 18 Aito,�� said L2��ren 5w��y. Facebaak's sustainabia€ty ar�� ammuCllty�utC��h m�n�ger. cont. "U�le rranted Chern ta�ann��t v�i#h downtawn ��enla Park. I��Te want them #o g�t to kr�rs,v their n��r ham�tflwn.'' Swez�y said part Qf th�go�l is t�get�rrtplayees far�iliar with the shops in to+�tt. Th�t S�t11e Shuttfe is�vaiiahle tv wE�isk th�m back t� �fotiv�tovun P�1�nlo�arf�zo s;�op nt'��t. Fe�[aucks ar� an�xtr� inC�nCfVe f4r ernpl0�+ees tv ma6cE that trek. And the company plans tv �r�CO�lr�g�t�arrzs of�rnpl�yees to hol�! meeti�gs�ff C�mpus, u�lrlt� F�oebuck� for meals. Fa��baak h�s partnered wifh 15 4�Gal res4aurants ar�d sh�p� ��hd sr�il�ac��pt th� I=acebu�ks car�is. On� of th�m i� IU�er�lo 11e1a �i�r�l�s, vwned by Rai�er�a�ch�l�in. He s�id he's�een p��ased w�th Fac�b��k'� commitment t�I�cal merchan#s. Ev�n ��fo�e Fac�bucks launche5, �aeGheEein said tha company h�i�mad� hi� sh�p one af the primar�r vendQr�far prouEding p�rfs and serviaes tfl th�fle�t af t�ike� it keep�Qn �ampus. He's a�sa b�en ir�v��v�d Uv�th ��Fai�s �y Fac�bvak to�n�ou ra�� mployees t� bike fo wark, �r�d plar�ning far upgradiRg bi{�e trail�. As a resU It of those eNc+rts. he's �Ir�ad}� ssen �n irtcr�ase in custo��ers w�p�r� F��ok employees. In addi#ian to ac�e#�ting Facebu�ks, rn�r�harts will offer at�dition�l dis�aunta ar deals. In the bike �t�r�'� cas�, employees using Fa�ebucks ean ��t �t��x�ra 1D p�raent aif biEce accessories. Lett 83 cont. "I think it's a gr�at?hing f�r 2� ��any like that to giae bat�k ta#he cflrnmunity," h�sald. "I �an �ay that�v�n in the shor�an��nt of time �a�eba❑k has b��n th�r�. I`Ve se�n more of an im�a�t from #hem thar� E ev�r s�ti�r from Sun." F�acel��ak ais�a�reed ta inWe�t in � rlur7i��r Qf phyr$7cal irnpravemen:s t� I�cal trail�, �nd in �ffcr#s ta radu�a �raf��;lnpacf. Held up ��ainst th�� triUCh I�xrg�r investmcnts, th� a�tual dollars �Facebook is still warking �ut�h�e final��tails�# h�vv rnany car�ls will be d istri�ul�d, and h4u+ qui�kly}that Flov�r frQm Fa�ebucks are likely t4�$sm�rl�r. �n�f��oming mvnths, Swezey safd i}y��om�an�r �vili be m�nit�ring the pP�g�`am closely, sea ho�v i#is-� �nd isn't-- being used. "W2 w�nt ta see this inonsy spant,"sh�said. "�J��lan't+rrant th�9� t4 Sit i�t SDln�orie's drawer�rvnsr�they'r�forgatt�n." 18 �1�lhatever the ultirnate�i�im��rs anql dir��t irnpact af Fa�ebucks, ��e prt�gram is reinfo�lfl� cont. a�i importairt messag� th�t aw�t �an'�be amplifiied I�ud e�ough: VVe r�e�d aur �ig�est Gamp��i�� o tat� s�ri4usly t��ir oE�ligafions to st�pport IacaJ e��onarni�s anc€governmen#s. �lr�y �x�ust Ginderstand�i�at ov�r lh� it�ng run, f��future of Sili��n Valley de,�ends €�n having bath stror�y ei77pl�yers and health�+, #hriving r,flmmclrlit�es. V'de can't have on�, wit#�o�t th� ather. I als4 w��ted tv sF�are sorrte p�►sanal nevrs. Thls is my last�olumn f�r t��11er�ury Neurs_ In m}r 13 years ��+ering Silic.on Valley, !'ve lived #hrpugh tY�� ot-cam bub�le, enei�y d�r��lakiort, th� hous�ng m�Fbd�w�, and fhe rise af 5teve.Jabti ar�d I��le�,PLI, �'�� Isp seen an endless parad�af fas�ii7�fing �hat�.�t�rs and innava�ive technal�rgies. lY� �eEn my h�nflr ta ka$ ane ai'th� Ivlercury fV�w�' ��lumn��ts the last four y��rs ar�d sincerery��pre�iate th�f'natly re�ders wh� have faIlaw�c� alo�t�, screamed at me�n m�ny QGCa�ions, and sometim�s afFereci � ��t on the ba�k. All I can say is; ''Thanks." Lett 83 cont. z j ;�+ ' = ,g� ' t ji . � I ._.,.�...o�,. � ��, ,. " s.� �f ��r�� ' �#��i� ��.,,...,. 5 r x�n�c��. ,.� .�9 .�� p$ �.�,�r•....._.... � • „_, y c k`�q "' _7 ',s �i..�;}.c�,-,. .a."'� ¢�?�� i. .7 Y i'� E � �; ...r . � ,��£ .�j'—e� �i a}��=� � .��€ • s�ar.-rs-15 � •F' I � ..v_..:.-i.M-... . . � v ,,,,_� q� ��.-^.y�7 �r N i - ..y..� .� Y� . . y -'.�%�a�:...�:��.,.�.��..or` 5�'.'Yfd Or .�.—,..-_..-.�...._.......,..,.,,-..�_.. , - ��J ",• �••.,`.-�.�'�,��.':�vk�.�.! .��.-.�:..�—.,:-ti...,.,.ti=v....< ' -- � . r,. y� a . . . �..-t;.,...- ' ��.vxv-Ya?sa� . �r�,�e�t�nx�'�`�",,Y�n�a•rFx:x��'��%vti�.s'�sr.�iis�rn�s: 'e�ers'.�t-iuctie �.4G."� -r4`-!f'�,Te-Si".=�9NC°.''$.`,��A�''.n, � ��_'�:�YV&1`Aa:l'l.r�b'pA}�yS,.,�.v�-�n�r_��9."7"X��'E[[Y.•+': .i:rF ;uur,•"..' '1��-��-�-�}3Y.�.K�S:a.arY¢r-r��_r'±�r�t.a�a5ry�� K.uv��- - . .. . ..u �.:ci��n.,.Aa'....,-...�_,.- - - .w�-rv.�..;• �`� •.-� .��r-��., ,,.�-,.,.. �.W=o.- r - ��vt �i ,�n,..^ � . % . ;..�,�,;:,., � , � y I�� . t� .. ` k ,.,•�?=`�-`•', . x t----- � � 3. c-".• �:� ':-�r � e s . . ,. ... .a:. ; ...e.� ........-_A s �r. �r'- -�� -- ,:ra•�.:�,�: 1.. ' _�:- � � � 5 .�. �. i :I�::'s:�..��i" "; € ! 'c.: ' y - - 4 e -� ''��_�.�M Ir. t reer�r�"J� ;'; F ,r•'-':'.,`x': � •. �� f # i x.. - ,r..,,.:�.w%{.�.�k -ya. - . �'•--;�:;r:�:,,-. -� '�� r � a •: . . �°�^ � -� ;s. "� .:`�y^;:.•r�°� 9: e r....`.{�.,,�..�.o ..r.3 '"'�I � �'� a,. �. �$; ` --. ..�t• :S- � �, .. � ` 1 '� �;'e f�, ' i 'v:s. a�� +�"fi ,a: �A : L`=• .•-^' .�11�1{�� 78e f {% � `�/2 MIEe � �. �:' r�e:� =' 3 ,�w. w'F t � � ;:f�.�.:.�d�'�?_-.�� :. � � ;. �� ,,... ... ,Ac�luC?„o, �.. � � ��a�1�#�s'<:=�� ~y 3' S d, z� �.._��'�k:�u",�,�i�� v^ � I. ,_,1 .i' �.- ;:`,`�- � 4�� Y�„ :,:aS...i.'�'� �S - i i �� ,....�..,.��eai�r ,� �Ma�r,�n�� -:..w'^ ,�...'h'ian,scekva �..._�.Mr�rl[f 6,.,. __ �} �� x r—r,� 5�,�"" ., -�;_�; -� : ..,.....��Ek�x�:-.�;-......�.-a �+ a i i; 4fAF�pleTree°n ...� ��r ,. T e �,,..�,�x:� • �:--,..,, , � ...',�-" } ... �E�'�i��In f � e ¢'6 1 ..eT�&f9v�%...�......,— n5. YF�'.D� � � 1...��.#Sj�,�� 3 �}. � c� !' . .. ..�.,,.,� �`s� ,,.: ' S"i: � j �( _ ..d� 3 1/�Mil �� r }' � .�.'' �� : �.. ' ,��,� _�t 1g � : �.� c � � _� �: ,� .�.K �-�s�...,...� E i�nF!+rc1 Ur �_._ 4 � ��:. �- 7� �� r: �� C011t. � ....�y- � €6r ��'� i. $_' F S n€•:, °�i E � ? �� t i �.S 9 �::? 7 y PCOLhilIBE Lfl t � }� ' - �m�e R � �nr- �� a��r�..,.c4e_.�.-'� ...�!�zn Galc��....y....�.,. � ...,.... � �aT� a!#' � � . � �' - � .,�"� W= �y t� r ��. � _ a � �� '1 �.��9!l�i„qr ,�'�.,r..y.- ...,....j.. �15.�7.' I�r?stFtica ...:SreStAv,e,l.� ' d6 3 �'' .�S r , � :1:.- ,8"Tr..:�.=.,H„}.,r,�....,.......3� �7 ...r7�,�'�:°„�'� � � .,�,� � y�� : a.s. �! �,,,;Yai �� '�d� � � � � �q•C FV 3' ,t7. �"' f] .��P�r�� i k f Y`� � � c � �� q ,rc, �3 �.. .,�, .;�,o � F -� x ��A��F?�� x � ar �� $ '� .. � _..,....,r��Yl-' - � �� Al�iy�� e �: r�. �9� L a k � �Sx ti>1-�r �� .�; � �. .. ...,..�..�-.. ,�,.��s..�.,�u«.x •.�� . • :.3 H;,,'�ru�;k e 1" s- "-�'`I 3 Y.-�'i � � �� tl s S 70 ;:�' � � . �t:ur�.!nin14 i+�r S' i�:.•�}s,..:, ';1. � .r �S. � " . -�,....- s�L. � � f.. :��- � i. �i• Y ;� �� .5�� ,S� � Rain�l�l �� + � �� c a f 4r • ' ��5 � 1. � � ` �_ :`� .� ' � :��. ^�� , �, �.. � . . �:_}. . � :....�,"sfd,-=.�s��'re,'g��Fi[��,r.,...�._,,... uE.,r.�:�;w,.,,.-.,,�,.-:-r.�+�-es , ..-, _•w:yxY..�w�..,;. ;.d--.-{L.�',;'-`.' ,::t L��rld � `- ;.'s• „n,...,.,..'� � ,_•,, 4� � � � ��.: �,,,r J+�712 Of�i•_e B��I�ir.t�<_Sen.rti t f 43fctcr o ' ��+r� � x �� hn�,IrCreter�a ��bmm.t�n��sa��' v S a........�_...... �� rxz Cr �.�:aliAre_- 20� ".1 ;�.i5 O;t A2s � F ��y- ..-w.�a. ..,r�•.��_ W....� �Vr1i r.s s _ ; �.. r �'�H�i �" ��FR� �raject5ite& S yi er c��4r�a V:id�4�Y�-,r.r,c:�.'a l�..Frr.ja t::v-i�"i�J,��i��r��,.�o•�:;i;iliY.si::i�.=i�-LPrc;kce�i=N�r. � F14urQ 1 �C� . . - . , _ ••s�:r.e••.- :a . v,i a•+:rienri+ =•.��; .-r.. ��:�'.7.�+:•:iT.�:,r'. ':f:' w:• -'t s�r��r�'° :i"' . .:r: :•il • . ... :i.. ;•.��'.6 i jn��:�j`:•• .•.... �•T�T•: _ V' jL: F'�rF:':Y' 'H.• Y ' 'S, .j•': •�'�"•�]• �S� '�:,�•, ..�t��:��:"" `!:,- 'i3'?,'-,`f� .ti�::�- :�f�'.. %-:.5.; �� Y;.Y .}' ..' : [•=�1 ��[�,�f��.��F��r� � �:'•_�- •�r � f��: �j..E'.��:f1:.!7 2'�''�.«T_.°�`':,`.�.� :5�:.:' �� vi�~: .. 'vr.°_,.:.f. � i,:��''r-• h�� :::Z•: �y,~' ' �'� "r�•' ' Y� �;�'': H:: �,'i' •.i�'v`.::`.�:•'.: i •''• .'-_�.•�•, •.c� :.• ��.-, , •,•if,��_r� �:� s F:r::•:•::::; "�.ti.��:;•,...: •:� .'';' .'�: ��f�Fx;'+=�''.'{,�;frs�;�>..J�:yE.�.��::�.'�':.:::�:-' _ �e r �:.;:; ;:-;,r r•.• tiq" i;a�.}•7?° .� .. .'�C�'�`•.r. � �±.•�..f:'r�s :.): .Z�f� :.i �1��^!;,"`.��-S';t<��:t��:n:':'�_>:..:`:• �i'��[.��• ��1 ;'.�;.:f �,�. .�.�+ .u•!'y:�','�9�� :.:::w•i'': :i'J'•• ' -`.jl:-- �:v�:�YZV:'� .'i.y':� �y �:�� '? �« ; _ i :.: f, ��:fj(�.�!•�•:� '•��}t. Y" �F�i f'.''::..:.::.•F.� •.�'•. [`._ .. •1��1 r�,��_. fe::i. ' �: ..:::�:x• ., r.:y:':. I�'�rc��c• f:. p�^r•Mr!.� �.'k"�;'^i.:. _'.-r:i:�,�c.. � ;'� .�J ..F�.. �.� 37. t'.�.��« �:+' ._: �•'�.:; :.. }�"-1�.,•• t. �i.'' ^Cii`::.:' .[��.��i. <<" : :r S`�.:�s.��. a"• • :-::'•t:'.. :7:' :L�- ��:��^.e.?, �_,'. � {.Ys -- '��, �' 4� i�tr '~��'�,�� -{� ::;��:F.:• . .. �= f'ft�i. � ,:�'�•;Fr.i�: �':::��:�•:L.: ;�, •r:' ��':� ;.; F• - =� :�'.'�'Y.:,�.''��''�;i=::Y �}�R:.;F:i:�e;n� . :y:�� f Y �Y� f��,�� j�, :1 .;X;.. •�''��_:Lf4• �SI. 'r♦ L9.k�ji��r ., ± y°i:�it :� .\]}.:•. .��3 i.y _ :_ __ M' .J�• �� t �r S:'.s.'�-;;. �� b1•3�� '!a i:i.i�:'^y,/.� •: � • �1 q '! :;�; 1. .�rl._ , '. � ':4�,; •,i� ��.�j�` +``'.ga.{S�dry�ti ��{�'�'��4ti��~ ]" � v- - _�... :y„s s:: �+ . ::�..'� •� -. `.3`1't�:+�-e., •rxS�, .T�' -_`.;!, ''r'r �3icr ',;S�' a N¢iM�� :�Y- + �..f,.�:..r l �•'r-;•:' ��.::��,.,"..�'�.' � ,�:i.+ -'�-:-,.:�• ,.Y.�,�• .(� •tR ':�u:� tY' .r"r7:.i_. �, :. , .. .,_ y, .. � � �� :r :�;:;' �'n ' ,f�: :L:,=�e ••��ry r�.t%��'�,��,� °}Y •�r:Y:� �� .� �,;'.•.�-�•a;C., i �ti f. � >.. �.: . ::�:Y`'t.- FJ. ,�T��•� li��i.' i r. •i.�'''..r;'�:• ..4q� �.!� �`�'� %7r+� • i': •.j.••%••' !•: �+'x � �� &�'E . _ ��' ��.�.?�i..� 'V!�:r: ��RJf�� +pp r •. '"?.' Y'�' •. 2i: ` 3 �� .��:?• ; ''L,,i':::`� �[',_+, 9 k.: �',�'' S: 'Y,' wj?•..:�:��. :��. o- :rL� �+i�;s); � �ri � . ��;i�'!:;�'.�. , • .r. J'L �� + �. `'j'T.' 'v��:4��ti:'' �'�, f`.. .�;3 .� 2;. ,�' c;,^ •.�i;�;^-':��::� ,�� ! .� fli.:� �.��_: S rl" .' i. � .e t` �`•�rv�':��••. 1 s�. '_ i-:!-., �i r:fi'��a;�7~ �=�d w' �' ��r .�`.'�' -� ,:�ti ��. '! . �p.�.,.,,�; , L -:[�F �;c. �;�" .. ,�- ., :,,. '�:a�•�' ' :•;;�:�: �r=;'.' rr.i's�. � '�." •i �.. - • �r. �' :, �' � _ �-�.. RA;,i:.: •ti, �-Y-� '��1�� ' 7�' J ? r�i k; ?-�'�� _!F��.-,+�":� �:'YS`� •.y. r:{' .. :� �. ,•�� y• • F �"�.:'' �rha"a�.`. ' ��T :f�. � ..`yi:; i ,1 ' :'�', •�..�Y•��: Aa. :� . .:v{:;�„ r1i�� . .. . � _:,,• �d:�ci,'v.` ?�' . r;Y..•. "�' r�� . i. .r„'- • .:..,�.r.; �..i e.� � .�•!:+ _ :%IGn�;• , ��>. �;r,}��, �'y . � i -i!= !ti 7S� • ,� �:,;i. cr"','h�?•Yi,, • � r.- ;i . ��k.:• ��fr r.;v •'„y��_ ''� '� r s;:;��„�j..��,G•zu _/ � � � .Y•.`f�....�;'�.pt ; f�;!' :�S i.r:.�'�.:�.. •r :r ��°� 'v, s , •r,:�b3.�.��•�.,: :. ��'`� l,r�r`.�'�.'�'i a's�'�.•''�:e a• ��h �'e7 S. ��. V••:...l. y..,. s:�_�r. :r F.� ,,. ,;,;H..�k.a.:•:�i.••- r� �i:' �L'�• ��:y�i�;,+.'r.'��' .:IGar..e�' �-Y-Y Z� °n� .� .1. � i�� r':F +. :.7t' .A��.,y"Y ! �'. 'i: �' ' 3y, •}'J .?: �Y' �` �i�� — .n:^ n� �:S f � %n L J Lett 83 cont. E�t�rie� C�n"t �v�p�te �rith ��I��s Fr�� Fac�d By �aniel DeBolt Mauntaln VleVSr llolae �rid�y, M�ar�ch 16, 2�12 �ince F�e start�� h�s North Qayshare�andwiGh S�l�p with his brath�r 21 years a�Q, l�ictor Ja�ailah saw the neig��bnriiaQd do�bde in siz�, 5un Micr�syst�ms and Silic�� raphics rise and fall ar��th�dot-com �s�om became the d�t-cam �ust. But nothing really p�epare� him for Gaogle. Over tE�e las:Eive years the flaw Qf customers to Cfluntry Deli f�as steadily�eclin�d �y T� pe�'C�r^t �]y��r. w11iCh J�da11�h�ttributes to th�displa�smer�t of his custamers as GC�ogle nomes ta�aminate the Nar�� 8a�rs�o�e neighbarhaad, 18 "They f�ed kheir empEoy��es," Jaciallah sai� of Gnogle and its growing numbsr of cont. workplace cafes. �'it's hard to �mpet�vrith fre�_" Frarn the aar traffi�. Ja�allah estim�tes there are at I��st�s many e�nployees in the n�i�hb�rhoad a$ti�ere�1+�re dut�r�r�the late 199�s cio�-cam boarn, but he's onlu se�ing a third of the business h�saw th�n. Illu3tr�tin�fhe problem, the Cau ntn�Deli h�d heen c8�erir�g reg��larly ta the formar Micro�pft r.�rn�rus b�1 Vill�Stre�t�nc� Shar�lir.e 6ai�leuard, but that stop�ed last year v�h�n �ao�le baught thai campus Loo. r4nd G�aagl� has r��t pl�oed any arrlers t❑ r�pl��th� IDSt C�C�I'Ir1g business, Jadalla h s�id, H� says he re�ufarly hears froin his castoi7�er tha��oogle has hough�thei��m�layer's buildint� and they'�I be fe�ving saon, such as th�wor�an employed by f�eur�pacc v�rho gatre hir Some��t! ne�vs I�st+nceek. The rr�edical dev:c�corr��aany is nn Sh�r�bird�!'la�+where Go�gl� has hought most af the land fnr redevelopi�ent into n�vv Googl� �fFi��. "As yQU drir�e up �nd down the street thPSe ar� alf Gao�ie buildings r�aw,°�i��ll�€� s�id. 'All the bus�nesses that used to �e here, a $I�aY qf biat��h cvm�anies, tech co�rip�r.ies— so�ne have moved aut on th�ir own but�adcale ib t��i��11y ir�habitin� all thes� builciings." JadalEah had �nme hnpp�th�t thi.�gs w�ul�t�irn a mund ur�til�i�e"�1�i1 irl the�offin" happen�d �ar3y Jast�+ear. Goog I� E�4u9 ht the buildin� housing the Country b��i a# 9fi74 Narfh Lett 83 cont. S�nrelir�� Bl�rd_ He said h7e+traa tal� by Goo�ls to relocate ---his leas�v�ill not b� r}en�wed� u��hen it expi�-es in'tour years. Jadailah said he as�C�d � Go��l�r��e�enta#iv�, his �ontacf for tt�e leasa, if k��e Countr� Deli could serve as an flffiCial Gaagle cafe. J�dallah said th� r�ply �vas, ��Nat an rny watch��fr�m a Goo�le real eatate rep. �ity r�carda have since indicaterJ Goagle's in�e�tt fa t�ufld �C�f�YOr�rnplo�I��a dif�ctly behlnd the Cou�try DeEi at'.415 .�oaquin Road. "UV�'ve put our heart and saul inta this, m�brQther and i,"Jadalla4�s�i�i. °It`$di�h��arCening." h��ving Dut Jadallah said he asked Go��l�to"help us relocate in $vme way," perhaps by lowering the rerlt, but r'�CelV�d "no ooaper�tian w��af'�Qev�r."B�4�u�e of this stc�ry, �QO��e has r�sumed t�lks tivith Jadallah and he hQ��s cQ�s� ahle to get out af his lease before it e�ires in 2�'f�_ ss it tivould 5e"a mir�.�le" It he sf,a��d in btisin�s �ntil t#1�n he s�id. A��gle spok�sperson told the lfoi�e Chat Qn m�3re than one oc�asion �oagle has off�rec� relc►cation assistance in ihe pa�tf�r busin�s��s in"sirnilar situatians," 18 "It's an exper��iv�propo�i�i�n t�r�ave and v�ry difficult tv find 2� IoG�fipn,".�ad�llah said. cont. �ie has�v�emplaye�s, all af u�horrE have f�lr�ll[�s to support. "7his n�igh�orhood �vas goQd ta u�fc�r�nany, many years," Jadallah sai�, "1�da�sr�'t s�em right th�t a landlatrl car�just empty out a�!your customers and collect yaur rent," It's not just the G�ur�lry Deli that's r:oticed a�e�reas�in business- ��Gnoale is reall�Eci{fing Gs�'� said �erv�5 �'uks�l, awn�r�f Falaf�l and Keb�b an Plymauth Avenue,which he says h�� seer��declin� in bu�iness �v�r the I�st three years as Gao�le �xpands. He said he's spoken��vith n�arby�aterie� HQn Sushi ar�d Sunrry So�r�l, and"all vf us want ta mov�out." Bu:Yuks�l has ��y�ars left an hi� lease. A New D�wntavvn �he situafion illustrates the chalk�nges flf pl�nni�g e S�COnd �awntot�vn dn Narth Shor�flne Boufevard w�ith outdaor�af�s arnong Y�e �nviting �paCe�; �.s proposed b��Govgl� repr�s�ntatives and oth�rs during the Gity's genaral plan up�ate, I�the area c�nlinu�s#o be �iominat�d b�� Go�gl�, Jadallah said he ciaean't see h1ovV r�staurants, arguabiy fihe heart of any such �a�nmui7ity, oould sta� in business witho�tt a lunch �r�wd. Ev�n if anath�r 1,�00 hc�m�s �vere built in tne araa, as �oogle has aJvoca[ed, Jadallah n�tes tl�rat thnse resid�nts�vottld be mostly GoQgle employees,wh� now numherove� 94,�bC in I�orth Baysh�re. Lett 83 cont. A G�o�fe sp�kespersan said GQagle �4nt nu�s ta be intetes#ed such a rcdev�lhprn�nt pla� for housing nn North Bayshare w�th ��tail an th�batEom flppr, '�More fh�n 2,�D��a4glers an�their families live and work ir� A�ount�ir�Vierr, participafing in the c�mm�nity and su�pflrking I�cai �usinesses �nd�chools;" said a st�t�ment from Gcragle. "Ir additifln td supp�rCing tn� communitythra�igh a vari�ty af gra��ts and sp4i�$��ships,�+v� regularly en�ag�wili� loca]uendvi�s arrd c�ntrx�tpr�thdt�re essential to h�lping th� business 18 r4r� srnBOthly.As vue continu�t�hire in Mout�ts�in�li�w, tiv��re�dmmitt�d to v�rorkin� closely wit}�th�cit�+ �nd th��om�rtunity througn our�rovwth." cont. Th€� Gaoyl�s,�okesperson adde�J that G��la Ga;es mostl�r serve bre�kf�st and lunch, th��gl�dinner is also availa�l�at s�me of G�ogle's cafes. Jadal��h tiv�s skeptical that �forCh Baysh�r� rest�urarlts cou�d sunri�e€an dinner business alane. "Hoti�r would E survive on a customer�as�that w��ld nQt came in my star�?"J�dallah $�id, Lett 83 cont. ��nstructioii S�l�s � �s�T�x Su��,�st�nn�; De��lap��nt�greernent f�r S��nf�rci 14��di�al8r City af Paio�lta `'fhe�Ixh�lts Yarii�s s'1�11 ase thrir vest effi��ts t❑�r,ax��x�iae lhe�iG��'s alla�a�tai�uf 3a]c:s ancl u�e t;�x a�scaciat�d witk�p:-Qjec�constrUCtian and o�7eratis,n c��fc�l;ows: [.�) l�es:�n.al•ioi�vf 1'��+�ect 5itc t�r �:onstrtt�ti�n P�ri�d 5ales�nd Us�Tax Purpascs ...tttc�U��C�arties�h all U s�tk��ir��st effor�t4�L�xtcn:allo�rfc� hsr l�w ta: (i]o�tain all perm€ts�z�d :ieenses n��:�ssary�r maxiniiae the t'itT's all,acatio�i�f wtisLruc;Lit�n use taxe5 d��ivpd FxUn';#h��t'OjeCT; �ii] dcsig�tat�,anrl reqt�ire iis�c7nti'actors and suLacontractnrs tn�ESi�nat�, �kx�pr•ul�erty� 19 as thc�]aGC af sale nf all 'f t13CC131'e5r�Ii;ii�islicJ �<<_��'ur iiisl�llt��s part«r"th�Proje�t; �iif] dc5i�n�tc, an;i r�r�3�ir�all of ilt c�iitr��ctor��:�d subcantraetnrs tr�desig��,�:}�� 1'r�lp�rt,yr sl�tl�t p[ac�of e�5e nFall "rrtia.�x'i��l�" llSC:{.1 1I1 l.�iL'C:t}ILSI!'U[;11d:E7 i]�L}]� P!'C?]QCT; �i<<j rc�c�irc�ill c[�n.�'�Gtpt'S dtl�5u}]COIYLi'�CL�I�s t�}�llc�catc thc 1«cal sal�s�nc�nse t�Kes c�Pri�rec�lrt►llt thcir cantracts ti��•ectly tn Che Cii.�,•. �]�w�lapment�4gr�em«�xt for F��ebo�k��'�est C�nipus F�. Lity of Nl�til� F�i•k "�}.cUtriit�il;iiiii�la wUrk +,r�•�#h the Citl�so that eli�ial��articns of�tic sales tax�s:��iti hv tiei•tai:� r�ualit�ing c�ntra�toes, suUc�nt�°�.t-t�n•s �nr� m�t�ria: si:1��liPr��,w�tii re�p��'�to l'hE e�nstr�etian nf� �hc Gl'�st t"�m�13s�rnjer.r.ai•e aaloC'�xfed#�the(:�ry;" 'a�co�nmitnient to t•vorl�t�i�li ttr�t;it�to m�xi�ni7��he C1tyt's capCure vFuse Cax arisin�fr�ar:�thr. ��urch�sc��f fu rn ish:n��,pr�>>i�mQnt t�rz�l p�rsc7n��I prr�perty fnr the in��i�l ncct�p�:7�y�4(l�ze ►x�w buil�i3ng�rr�t1�e l�dest(:a�pE�s;" Sc�:�r�e: f�cehnott lfvc�t �a:�7pus P1COjecl—lle�'v�lc�pmenk f��rc��nr.nt TPrm �hPPF 1 Lett 83 cont. Johzr Te�iait�s,Directar rinbaf F�eai Lst:teJFacet�oo-k �ai�aar�ib,2L�i3 A�d��sL ii7-:'i��t�r�stru��icyn c:cfntract f:�r tr�8��1�'�st Campus to rec{�iz�e qua�xfyin�subcontractors (i.e.sub�anti-aeCars f�r 55 mrllion or la��cr tivith Suhcnntractnr{that havt r��ci��r��les -�x 19 permits) ko gPf a ti1IE�-�'}8r�it.to desi��i�e N.�»[o N�t�lc�s p❑ir_t�rf s�l�sa t�t�t s�ile3J�:sc ta�:o�� ir.aterials is allocate� ko tl�e Cit}�" cont. "�oope�ati c�n t��ir� MPnI� =.�axk ta s��k ta h��ve �ise taYes fr�r lai�ge p��rch�se c�rtiers (i.e.fli•dcrs o�er �50U,UU�I] hc3r init'al occupr.:�c}-�F��1�'ast Ca��pr�s la kiave iise �axes�11ocaCea C��i� �i�.y Sa�zrce: �it!r of IYienlo Fark City�out�cil l�ieet�n�Janu�rry�z��C�I3 Statf'��port#�:3-013 Lett 83 cont. �E1�I1C A��£5S Calabazas Cr�ek Linkag� versus Calaba��s Cr��l�Tt��il �Cal�ba�as�reek�in�a�� pra�ased h�Appl� The pedestrian^c��te�lnn�Iti�rth Tantar� kti�entt�asSaCi.�ted�,�ih [�aiaUaaas L:x�eek [beL�neeii Prunea�idg�A��enue aitci Vallco �arktn�3!}r�W1II}J0 FYi lIT1�lIY1'LxG'CI �S:�a�T'y�[li:G� TtIL+L��alk��a��itseif t�f311 �r�vide mo�e c�rnfflrt ar.d saf�:y,Im�7r.7�fer� materials,�l�nking.�znd ma.rlced iaic+�cl� lanes. Nc�ti+ intcrpra�tati�c sign.age svi:'.be l�cated a1;:ac�nt tu{:r�tels�is:�v.;hc�ls a�rhe Nr��ti Tar_tau .l�en u�cr��sinn,th� 1-��i U av-erpa s�,��d at l�l e Vall cu l�a rlcak ay�crc�s�iliK. 1+�ithin th�5�?-�'oot zot�e�dj�ceni Co'�:'�� C:�l�':-�aza� Croc:lc righf-nf-�n.�a��, ��fan�i��follo�vs gui�lelir��s�nr�standard�fnr land us� ne�,r�tr��ims frrain l�otl:th� Ca#ifnr��ia N�ti�� P[��iiG S�i�iety and l��e S�E�I.a CIara lfa]]e�•1�fate�'T�iat�'i�t'3�ualif�i�.a Pl�nt L[s�. '1-he�rc:ject incl�des �}nly]ryca' cultivars�Fr.ati�c s��cics�lE7ng#h� Cz-�el�, Pl��s�nril_be r�nie�ved wi�:h the Sa n-a t�lar� 1��ll�.y�iater iii5t�-ict Fnr Fin�l �ppl•�v�]. 5�aurc�: A}a}yle C�m��s 2 20 �'rnjcct Ucscri�tion A�rri l;�[I l.:i Pa�e9�1 �it� C�nn�ctiv��r, L�nka�e��d �uhFir. l�X�p�'r�vE�m�Y�Cs ExhlbiCA-� 5it� G�n�7ecCi�vity�Li�ges and �Puh[i�Rcalnr�Im�im�eni�nts �ni�i•�:�: A�,pl�Ca�npus 2 I�r��je�-t 17e��rip�i4�1 r�pril�[]1:i r�a�P ��-a.� ��z� Carnment� There is 11E0 pa�t��ic��e4�to landsca�ed F�r�x�f Appie pr��ei-ty ��.��sti�an�: �dh�r to City af eu�ertino Ge2��a1 Pl�n, N��'fh�aUco�IasCer Plan��1 S�u�h�aIlc4�Iast�r Plan for�alahaa�s Cr��k Trair. � Lett 83 cont. Cvliab�sxate w 5an� Clara Caw�L��V�tI�'�VV�tG'J' QIS�'l�t. A�apye Securi�y Plan all��vs s��YXri4y of thi�ar�a. rac�boak [1+lt�st Cain�us)cnnncct� via an undcrg�ound tti�t�r.el�vith rac�bc»k's��sL Caiti�us cill �ft�oChEr sid� oFthe ex�ressw�:y, Ss�urcc: F�cebook�h❑�Ses Gchrv h;r Tit�nnie Gslil�ge: San JDS�P�ei�cury N ez�vs Au�ust 25,ZU12 �'ubli�l�ic��sv tr��+1�'est Camuus l�rtclscaped areas adjarent:o thc 13<Lyfr��r�hpr�ssG�ay underc�'4ssin�eascmettt. 20 �Vllf'1:�: Fr1C�L]{jl1IC�NCSt C.dR1�El�a��4J��- T}PL'PIf71�lllf_Tlr?�ar�cment Tei'i�_Sli�eC C011t. �c�hn'1'cu�«�s, I�ir�Cl:or�:nhal Real �;stat�f F:;.ceL��ok r�nuary 16�?D 13 P�:blic t��cess t�th e 1;�r7dsC�ped area in Ch��i�iRit�Qk�'��u=�aerc:russii�,iicai'�h�:]]oxt'Raad. 5ouree: Citv c�f I�Ienlo Par�r City�:ai��ril I�leetir��<�nizar�22,2f�13 SC:`i[#Rep��rt�1�-�13 °'r'ti� c�.tnp�.s��vill 'n�ladc a pai�lclilc�entr��Ce pff�lR�:lfo�.t�rnad a�en fo the publie. �tu:�nel b��ath�a1�Fror.:Express►��ay w ilj c��nnec:hac�t�uulc's tv�o ca:��pu�es- Suurce; Faceb��k Gets UK t� I�tuld 5ecottd C�mplzs Uy H�rnniL Esljn�er 5�n]ose h7ez•cury Ncws rurG.-�r��,��a�:� � Lett 83 cont. "As p.�i•C a��lt�Easl.��t:�piis co�n�dnent��ilie �•rr�j�cl, Fa�ebook is tr��radin�the ex'.sti+�g underc�c�s�irrg�,��makinh i€n�rq�ements t��llcat�.� faceh❑cak errt�7lnyees�nd n�em��r��ft�e��bl�� trr utili��th�undercrossin��ria bicycle flr fc��atta hypass the a�-gi�ad�crossing oF�3ayfront G:s�ressway. �s par-l:af#he��s�Cam�aus ccznpan�zlt oFthe pz•oject,��12 Unde1'CrU5S1X�g W4UIL�F3e f�irthEr irzipro�red to alla��v us� b��the Fa�:ebo�l��gle�nuver�ystem,in ar�c�ition ta bi�ycle.�titi �ed�:strian usr, Tc�<<nsurc hic��list;and �edtstrian saf�t;�in th�ur�dtr�r'c��sin�,tr:affic�nntrc�l dri�i[:is wnuld be ii�stall�d aii l��th sides�fthc itn�crc�-os.sin�for t:c�nti'oIlyrlo ir1�r�:5�f e�;�ess�f th� j�f,"Li�]��[IlUvG'!'�J+al�iii init►i.he un�:�rcrc�ssitc�;." 5aurce: City o�MenJa k'arli k'lannii��[:annmissi�x� �nceting Septembrr�4,�U�� Plai�niii�C�:�iiiii5sf�ii Sl�:fl Rc�c�rl P�gc� Ag�nd a iiem�T�.� Cit�oFl+��enlo Parl{City Council�ectin�Octobcr 3�,��12 Staff Repart#12-1�i1 1�e7�C i� ��tc�la IE�t�:-�F-1 S�rnsr�rY� 20 PU�LICLY�1CCESSIBLE OPE� SP��E: The pr:��vely�wiied o�en apac��ithin th�projcct tha.�1s cont. lnr.�r�d�Iniig��ahlir. ri;hrs=nt-�ti��v�nd p�r��skriai7�i�}��h��Ks,z�a I I��fa�rs and �laz�s shall ha publid,�ac��ssibie. Th�appli�:ant sh�ll ha�c thc ri�ht tv ❑staU�ish ar��nforcc reasanable ruies ant�.r�gu:ati�n i'4r th�use ot�the ape��space. [P�0]ECT-s�'E�IFI��1�UITI�N] 5t��irct: Cikv r�t'MUUnt��n Vic�v� FiiYdir:�s Rep�rrl.�Z�lniiY�I'e:'f�iil.ft�r�1�plicdli;�ii 11�-1�-1t �pril�6,'�13 I'��e 7 C�upertin� ��neral Y�au �U€�U-ZU�U Secti�n � i,.�t��J ilseJC�r:>>nu�iil.�Desi�a f}�aen S�r:��:e,P;�rk ant� Trail�; L] f::�l�ah��as l:re�lt Tl�er��s��i v;a1l4x'Cu�1�ly lot'a �t'ai}al�rti� Cala�a�a�Crcc:l� ltiaC v��u'.a the Vallzs� 3 Lett 83 cont. pi�nning�r�a to Cupe:tinr�Hi�l� ��hrrc}I and Cre�k�ide I'�rl�. '1'he��iit� {�i:�r� 1Pa_le��Vl�'ater Distri4k'S�'l�3Tl,5�t� C:reeks;nd Nah��I �`1DOd P�C7L"�CL�471 PI31k,� ��lls f�r i�:c:��li}r.��;rLCredLiUri�ppr�rl:uiiitic.a�al�n�tlie Cr��k;�5�art��tth� �lc�E�r] prot�ction�raj�ct. Ainri:h Vallc�A�Iaster�lan-Phase i '�'rP gP�mentnF{"al�ha�as f:ree� that runs thrnu�h �h��h�ri��Are� i5 intQn�er] tn h� it-�ti��rQ�ed as part oftl7e CalaUazas Cr�ck 1'rail. 5. �V�lkabi�iry/Cannectivity; �an�iste�t with cdmpan�3ecurit�r I'�C�lllt'�II]�t7t5,plan ne�v Il�[�f Ij�t��IO�T1llC�Rr}77��C1"RS c1fJlCl c1111C FIl�][:S tG��iiG1I1��xL'bYclllS�k]Illt]•'c�ilG CqRYCR1CC1� ct�ri�iLiliuii iii L�:e sltlay��l�ea�ild L�aaj�;C�r74�1[��5. 5.'L .,.I�;nccrur��c rhG�rc�vi5i.�n�if f��iliti�s th�C proificj�t��nnectivity bthv��n,�lE7ple �aiii��.ises.�xii�l bel�+�eez� Nox�tk�L°�i�cQ a�zd�it��z�l=ex�Cx��ssc�acis aYid �}�,�n��a Coll��e. 5.3 Cr�ek i�'�il :��€'��s. iArnrk��Uith A�plp ai}d i+lTater�isr��t�ra#f tn exnlnr� kh�: p��4i�ilit�� ottra il acce�s dlor�� ::�lab�L�S Creek,wrile evaluating fl;�t�cl prc�E�ctir�n, 20 ticcurity anc�iiabilil��issucs. cont. SQUth.�'�+L�CO lUlasr�r Plan j�OU� C:h�rpt�r �: CirrNatiart T.h er�are oppnrtunities to deGelo�bike p.�ths with:~� the pla�a area and the f rna,}r�c 5-tuclieci in�Iuairag t�[iEaiLi[��t�ie S�iii.a Clara�+alleu L'I�aler Dis:i ict lt��iacuss�uL�iilia.l 0'�p4S'tuniLieS, C:ala�a�as CrGek is at�irt1�[��'E.�1[]L el�[yY�ri1 l0�:]��71�r1�t'e�1 iri iile�iLiL��tld ��1]it�C�lV1tSF, Th�rQ may be��portunitie5�^�itkli:�tkxe ptar.ar�a faa•n��r dOL��lbp'.7k�I1[5 kik G4nn�Ctt� �nd �u��nr�th�i��lcmcnt�tirrn ��f ptdc�tri�n an�hi�yilc c«nnc�,�tic�n alc7n�thL �akaariztis Creek trail. �ubject to :nlaut�f��an:��ariaus�orrimunit�r s�akeh�ld�rs,L�n��1 s�rround�n��andn��n�r�,�p�t��va•uati��fland prqteCCir�n,security,anr�li�hilitv i5su�4, the trail :rrxpl�rncntacinn rrEay �rovi�c ac�c�s t��V�licc� P�7rl��ay, �fi�hw�y ��0 undcrpass and'1'�intaii A�en�:e. 5anta f:lai�ti allty W�ter Qi�ti�i�t Th�Santa�1��,'�lle}r 11��:rr I�istriet[SC�1V�� oE4ns and maintain�t1�.e Ca:ahazGs(:rEek right-ot-��-a,•(in.t��ur�in��h�sc�;m�nt wil:Fiin I.li�pruj�4�l sil�]. 1'l�:r�a�k ltz�:Cl�a:i,�afc� 4 Lett 83 cont. (:r�zks anci li atural T'lc�o�l Prateetian�lan,�C��L'�TD partr.ers�t�ith ciefes�r�d c:�ur:ti��t� in�c��r�tte tr�ils,p::rl�,a,iid recr�ation�pportuniti�s al�r�cr�eks intc�exi�tin�or nc�.•�x floar�cont��oI��-oj�cts. App�e Cacnpris� Fro�ect Environmental Im�ct R�partJjune��13 Tk�e irripae�Qf the Prun�rid��l��enu�clasurc: "I�edestrians from d7e n�i�lihnrhaa�ir: 5anta Ciara��lye ea5��f t3ie�r;�ject site tiw�h�have a destination ta tr e w�st of G4'a�f�R��cl [�uc�as t.h� ��pertinv�T'.:lag�Sc�opp[ng Ccnicr] t�ould 1natiTc to��etour ara�arid the site usi�zg'1'a 7t�u��enuc�, I Imm�ttear� Rnar1 and �,'Vplf'P ltoa�tcr rc�irh thcir destinatinn.° "Aitho��h the irl'tplct cxI�noC}�c di r�cdy�n;� fully mitig�t�d zvit-h the 15r•nja��r,pi,p�i��QUltl i��rc►�e t:�e cnndiri nrt r�sitl Ling fi'om i'l�e ra�tte tl�surc bv contriU�::ing f��nds to 5tu��r puL�;nLial uff-�_LL��cl�3tri�n and��cy°cl� impro��euaEnts that�U�uld partiall�mitigate the i�npac�k. Tr ere ar�currcntly t�t��s�p��rtunities f�rtrial cor.�7ectians in the vicitiity: i 1) ['alaha�:s C:�r-.��k tr�i]a�7� ��7 �]�llg#he�i�•aina;c char.nel s�t�th�,f[-�E90�,ek�R�een tl�� existingl��plc l:�rinity LoaEa Cai�t�u5 dt�e�7�i1�I L'a11Ct�Ptiilt►�uay:' 20 cont. ''Thc tirsr a�portunit�incliides u�uhiicly at�:c��i�lc�n��lr.'->>5e par.h �[n�,�:}�e c:�t�baz.,s �:r�el�,t� thc nortli and south of'�}p�31�Cam�us� (altll��:�h iiul l}rrou�h the,�pple Camp�is L"4l� �� se�:uri�y� cut:c�rcis�. 'fhe sc�utl��rn 5e�me�iT�+��uld connect�o th�sicctv�llc�a nc� hicy�cle la n es��i i�`�lico�'arlcvvay ar�tl to thc �:'ca��s�d i-2�C`tr�il (r�i.;r.>>s�Pd bPlC��r'�. '1'he 11�r'tihern ��:�mtnt wottl r!�-�nnP,.t tn l�h e sid��w.Yfks�rnd bic}�cl�Izi��s vn Hon�este�d R,o�d. T17ese c��ttrec�i►��s v+ro�.:c�l�r_`I1Lifit�1E��i�e�n�lUve�s bot�.for ean�muCin�ai�d r�creatic�n,�,s vre': a�the pub:�c. The�o�7n��tian of u�icytic�'��lcstriar��traixie fnr empl��ees nn:y at th�s��thtrn ltn�sF tRn�:�laha��s�re�� l'�`�il tititd�r 1=��U,�:r�uld bc ad�.ed,i�detern7inecl to �Q ieasible.'� „T:�c�tcc�nd opp�rtut;ir�is�n eas�-i��s�i�rulti-u�;� �rath:�Inn�[-2fi{}. Th� rni�Ce SvQ.11d exi�e��d fr�m 7'ant�d�i Ave-�ue tn De.Ai;��T34u�evard aitcl vvoulci run alan��he�Yistin� irz•i�atio�� i�;ti�,�f-v��y al+�r�g I--�S{l anr� alrm;�xistin�surf�ce streets ncar �he'��lE�c� Shc��,i�;;ti�:�11, If�assibl�,rI�c�aatli��,�ay shc�uld h�hu i�t nn th�sirl�nF r.h�soiEnd��r�� rpasite t:�c�rcc�+,��ay....•. Iin�act T1�AN5�31: The�ro�ased ciosarc aFPruncridge Avenue between��ralfe Raad :tri� Tuili�u Avcnu�wcruld Hs��e$igni��•lm]D.�cts oif pedcsdrian acc��s becaa�e it w�tild re�uL�acteSSibility��rped�strians ��td elinrii��le��d�sl,rian faciliti�s (�itk�4f CuperCin«�. (SJ 5 Lett 83 cont. I�'ii�ip��li�r.IwTe��sure TR.4NS-3 x' T��ple�ne»t�itrga:i�n Cr�e�sur�s Plat�•�and I'l�in-3_ 1't�� triUl�i-Us��aths ar�d the}��e;tr'.an:rnpr��rnr�ii'.s pr��aus�d as�.rart Uf�t�c�i'�j��L W[I��IL� IC55C`71 t�1L'ir�p�.Ci,�?lll 1'�J011EC�I1bC IIII[1$�te th�iin�ract ta 1e�4-than-sigr�i��ant le�� s iPa� eli:ninta�ion nr Px�clin��F�iestrfa�i� faci I itics tvniald still t�tcur.[511� ��mrn�r�t: �tirigati�n 1��e7sur�s PLr1N-�and PLA�{-3 da notaddres�t��im;�act. �T�s myl'i�:��kY��F si�nifir.anr im�a�:tthP prnjar.t t+�[�iild ncctj tc��rc�vid�� dcsll'2�n C�11i]CCtlbri �cross thF praj�rt site that is a}�proxiir7aec-ly the s�uri�lenb�l:ti�s t'l�e Coai�leckiQii via prunericl�e�,v�nuc. Sueh a ped�strian canneckior�has�e�n dete��rr�ined��he i nf��si�:�;lu� tc��lpple'�priti�a�and se�urit�t reqiiirGme:�ts." This p�elestrf:�n cannection is the Cal3�7d7��Creek 7'�'ail. � �1�plc's s�c�nd"oPg�rtunitv"af�an�a�t-+��esk mulki-us�path�lar��1-��i�r o�i tr��d�af thc Sauz7d vaall n��nsir.� ihr.trcc��u�}T,frnm the rlp�le(:ar�pus�to the Inf:nity�Laop Cain�us, wciulti iir.p�ci l�ic �rivac,}�a�ld secu��ky'of Ch��•tino residential nei,�hl�or�iood thro�;,u,h which•:�is �atitx•a}�passes. 1Nain 5tre�t Cupe�tiuo 20 cont. �r�II�I'c:.l Pjc�t7 �'xail Pc��ic��-73: Llpen Space and Tr�il Linka�e, Decic�te ��r arqui r�cx��n s�rac�lan�.� ar,d trail�:nka�es to �or.nect arcas and pr�ti��c f��a mc�rc��►•al��ia}c�o:nmur,ity, Trail Strate�y: 'f'rai]PrUjG��s. Ittip:�ttie��t l�re fa-axl�r4j�c.s describec in this�l��ent. Tr�il�trareg�r: �7Qdi��r.cr.i'!'raii:;�rr�asements. 1{equire ded[�a�[on�r ease�n�nts fvr ti•ai�s,a�w�ll as�r:�:ir ilii�l�[T1e�1C�ll'.lbIl,a�p�r�aFt:7e r.�►eJ�}�rr:��7tp��ccss,��ti�hcrc a��r�priate. C�3�sist2nc;�; ...th� pYt�jeGt i5 pl't�tTldx�]P the ner�.ss�r'yr l�edestrian �a#hE��a}r fr'.:m�tev?rls �r��l�Soule�ard tti the:uture tr�.il heaci rc�rth c�f 1rGllcu Parkva�ry. Sflur�e: P7ain 5tr�ct�:�iperti►�ca 1'r�je�'t I lraft Fncl�tiQrl Fntr�rc►nmentai Tm�ar.t Reporl I}ctc�bcr 200� City c�f Cuperti��u B=cy�s�le P�cest:�ian Tra�tspnrtation !'lar� b Lett 83 cont. Tixke��y 12: rllve� Dri��ti� �an 11 e��D:-i�e-La�anen�ric�c--r'�rest A�ren�,e-Amh�rst�rivc [,onstrurt�il�P�ath hetvr��n Port�tl5chr�❑1 G��d ��r�i Park tv cat�tte�t lu �'�rlal Uri��E l+tis�rl��+��it.Y:�allco Shoppirtb Cen�er t�pr�ti�ide access thraugh wal] ts}��altcn�happir.� �cr�t�:� x�.Clt'aelc�c�s uc' Lirxlcy: Vallto Shoppin�Cen�er,�lp�le,... 1'osait��L�xten5��1: A113I7.�i'st U1'iVC t0 1,'all�n Sro�pii7� Cs��ier Rikc��ay 13: �;rPenleaf Uri��-A9arian:,��rue- A�Ieri'ill I�tiue-Pur�,dl bri+�� littractors or Lirik�; .,,r�ppl�,.,,��.`iii�o Sl�opping('intcr f'ass`.hle��te11�i01i: ��ei-rii.L Uritf��ca Vallc�5h�ppin�Cen�er �t�urc�: �i��cle Transp�r��lti�yn Plan �ity: ot�:i�p�r�inn 20 Bi�ycic l�tci�strian �:c�mrrxi55iori Ad�p�ed �fay 3r 2�11 cont. �gend�Itetn��: l�ic�xcl�lP�c��stri;�n�a:7ne�rivi��k 13�ta�=�cn Pr��sent rnri F:�ture Apple Cam�uses 1�1in��tes r�r his rn�eting una�ailahtc �a:�i�:e: �i�,�r.lr. F'r!d�st�ian Cn:-n�11i��ipn Cily c�f�u�crlin�a !�a�ernber 15. 2�4� ".'1��1c u��uld innpr�ve�e��isting s�curity tu��] m�inrain � hi�h�eu�l c�Fs�curity on th��t•d��;�cl �'�xl)pll5 th'U'.1�i?�7C1'atiall aF a pl'7�r::��S�C�i[iLy �livi5i�n d n[l v�� p�g�Cili']�Ci'1��SU�'0S. Sesurity rr�eas�tes ii7tlu�lt...�fic insi:allatin:�c�f zx�eta[. �ai�Jti�t-��1L�c�cing�ra�:nd th�er.t:re si�e." :;ti�urcc:: f��lt: �af��a$� 7 Lett 83 cont. ''R�C�U5°a�c��to th�irit�riar aF thc sitcwoul� be r�strieted (t:e site�r�rauld k��surrs�u�:�ic�l 1?�a s�ciiritv Fence],d�trelnpm�nk nr'i-he pr��er.ti��niild �r�cl uc9c t:�c�'utu r�cicvc➢��rnenC DF�Traiil alon� �ala�ra�.as�re�k ii� �his in�atifln. `l'h�refflrc,thc praject tiv��ll�pr�c:I�idP�'��cc�zi strnr.tinn nF� �anti;uaus tr�il �lon�tfiL 4:alaba�as Ci-c�ls riparian e4:ri��r,�vhith�ha.=,th��c�tent:al t,u str,�c�5 a r�r_re�'icanal ��11e1i1Cyi'1ih�Cit�" Camzz��n#s: Calahaaas�rcek is not partof th�A�rpl��rroperty; Cal�baaas Creek fs S�rnGa Clax�a Coucrty w,�ter Uisrr��t�rnperty, l�uhlic Eyr�p�rty. Th�existi�g Fense b3�Sac�ta Clara Gnun��+Yatcr Dist['i�t z'�5t�ic�;accx�ss Lu��nl'a Cl��'�C�unk��1Jater�istrict pi•apei'ty. rh�s�cttritg�fen�:e i��atGS�hc S�n�Clara�ouat�i�Tat�r a�streEt prc�p�rly fir�ir�lhe A��le Cain�us 2, T6ie ��ple prc�ject d�fs�[]'�'�rccludc thc camstA-uction�f�he C�lab��as Cce�k Tra91. ��l:.�ha�as Creek curr�ntly functicm5 as�{�aad chan�.�1��tid i�#�n�ed �y t11��(:yI+VD in parl.tU �dcJress sa ret;�anti sc�tirity can�eriis--..in addirinn,d�ue'n��in�thc cr�ci�tr�til Uvitltin l;�e sii��'��o�tl�i 20 ��m�n�ir_is•a C�i� pi�j��t 2.3p1iC�nt'�keysecurit�t obj�ctive��permitting t'.7e pllfalir, tn tra��r�e th� C011t. SItC. 5avr�e: E4pplc C�m.pus� P1'�je�t Dratt Gnviranrncnta'1mp�Ct I{ep�r1; Page 5�3 Coinmeitt: �'he pu�tic rs ace��in��ubli�pt'aperly� T1�erQ as NQ pu�lic access tn l�s�dscap�ri p�rtians af Ap�lc�roperty, .,.the City�ansit�ers the absanee af a p�blic trail thruup,h��e sil:e alaug Calai�axas Creelcto he a si�nrficar�t i�npact ir.thc��rit�x�af Gcn�ral P11n Fali�ies that prnr�8te the derrelapmentat a trait se�me��alpn�the cre�k(and the p�tential fun�Ci�rl�Fthis [r�t1l�5� rerc•eatinn.an�l ccrn�uiu�i��ae�i�y, S�iiree: 14.p�1e Caml}u,�2 Prr�j�t-t�raft En�rironmental Impa�t Repart Pa�e 54� i3 Lett 83 cont. I�npact PLA1V-3: The pr��as�c�proj�et wauld nat ful�y ir.aplcm��#�rc�Ilcies in thc Lan�l[7se� �pmnnuliit3�Desi�i T31�ments afth��eneral Plan�l�t�c!t��h� pt'Oti'iSiOri Gg�pPb]]bsE�Ct'�Li[ Segm�nt dlu��alab��ds�re�k,an�3 lhis c�i�6li�C��11d �'�SL1IC?�iil�ll�1LY1T011�1�11�311irip�Cl. �� rThe pt'o�ased pr�ject tva�ald nct implen��nk the praposad tx-ail se��cx�t al��zg Calal�azas Creel�. ��j�z� i►-�fc�ncral Pltir_ F�f�ar��1. �ccausL acc�:ss ta thc i��crioi� of t�:��ite v�ould be restricted b� a perimerer securi#v fen�e.�l�ti'¢1Q�IrI]Pllr��C�1��1xC1��C�TT1i3��rPfll:CjP_f��'i1tl1T'P_CIP_VFIi}r7T17P_Tlt f1F �[t�uil�::ong tk:e creek se�Z7xe�t t�-ithin:lze proj�ct site...." ,:...("�,lahaz�5 Creelc c�,rr�ntly f�n�ti�nti�s:�fl�acl ch�r�r�el and is f�nced by th�SC��'�+D in par�tq address safety szn�i$ecuri:�car�cern$," "....�pr�lc ha� r�iscd eonccrns that tl:c fundament�; objectivc af�s�curc�ampus titi�ould b� romprc�mised t�it.h the pra��xsio� of�p�il�lic[rail in�xned9arelv�a�ijacer.t tn nr thrnugh -ha�roj��r. sit�. B�c�u�e sucli a krail,�le}�endir;g on its de$i�:�a��assa�i ated !ands�apiuQ,it1a3•na#h� �c�r�,pJ��ly�vi�ihl�frnm tht �treet,trr�{�n��ik,i]ity�f uri�unc��ri�e�l acecss into ttic�i�aject si«ma� b�:h�i�i�ten...." 20 ''Ita aclditit�n,t��ri�arian cc�rrirl�ar«ithin tlie pr«}ect 4it�t�rminatas aL-a�utv4rt uii�.�r I-Zt#a. ]f a Cont. trt�il at C�l�b�c�is C'.reek threre�rnvided�it��r�uld ei�her t�rm�r,�ii:e��tt�� I-?S�cu:�,�ert or�tiroufd re;�uir��crn�sing unde�•or�,ver r-��0. ,� cnnnectior� �rnd�r f-Z�� nrnti€d be a�at�ntia ll��nstiy e�gin.ee�•in�s�►luti«3� c�r��n:alct nnly ca�e�a��l�d u riai�tl��d ry tieason (i.�.,unar,�aila�l�r�urin��he �u�ntt3•m�knth5 :vhcn�ala.h�alt�s f:rtclr c�7criencGS hi�h tivzircr levcls}.... 5ou�rc�; Ap31e Ca�n��:s l �'r,�jeet Drait L:nvir�snmental f m�a�t Re�a��rt rlpril L{]13 1'age 1�Z �amments: It wutald�ert�in3y he�esorabl�thatA�r�le�Sartici�at�s in th�design oF th�Calabazas Cr�e� 'Tr�il�a�lc�ress its cc�nr.arn4. iCiS�s�u�ed t�a�.A��le will��nslr-uc-t irfi nvJn F�nc��an itS�w� �rnperty adjasQnt to k1�e S�:V�1r'D��m}�ei•ty��Calai�axas Crgeit,result�n�;i» dual f�encin�. r�i�pl� may elect to pre�t•i�e� se��ri�y bufFer za�� an 9ts�ar�perty l��tw�e�tha twa Fences. 9 Lett 83 cont. �`pple i$�Y��dy]�lanning tn a�sist with �he lan�ls��.pang nf#1��rip�ria�n�n;•ridnr nt' � Calabaxas Crc:elc ancl�vuul�b��blc I.a�Rrvvicic assistance wit,t�its aesi��n� a�xu�iaF�:cl land�rapin�t��eet Fts secuxity cv�cerns, ��i�reasoi�the trail sc�nietimes il�sr;s d�irii�K the �s+inter m��flas is far pfltenti�l�l'�r.��l �lo�d�ng�c�l�ce�wher� t�a�trail passes�ii�au�l�a tunnei next to th�cr�e�,like at k3igl�N�a�+ 1�1 I�urin�Gl�sus��f lk�e ��il d��4a seasoxial cnx��erris, clir��l tkie puhlic to r�p}�le's a�te�-ati�te �alab.�z�s Creek Te•ail RBU�. Fre�way Z8� sh�uld n�l.be sor�sideZ'e�l a obsla�'1e. '£l��re i�an exist�ng cul��rt fvr �alabazas��eek under 2$0� The St�ven5 Cr�ek Trail bas utiliaed�xis�ing�ulv�rts an� hri�Dges es un�er�assc� undcr A�iddlcfrcld Roa�l,H�ghw-a��85 ar�Highway 101. F�c��ovk has prapnsed.i tunrlel Xin[��r State�High��#.o cannec�its I:asC ancl West�arn�rouces S�n Fran�:i�ca Ba�TraiY 20 cont. "Trail adc�aca�e��tirant Che��rcrn krs I�t th��4an l�ran�isco 13ay'1'rail) path fravcrsc its retin��•�, t�inallyTlinkin�; P�aint Ri�hm;�nt] �r�� 1'uiiil Mtr1aL�. 7'tic ccarripa«y fias i�lus�c�,i:iUi��se�ut'il,y rca snns," `.��1:7�r�c]r��nGam tc�th�enKiniiAri[i�ririn's rc�urL tati Llie[ii�€.L�:[. Tfie[e�sul'L yL�iL�S C��Vt'02a'� fc:cu rity re�nccrtis could. ��addressed easily." `'...a fenc�d h•ail t��4uld in:prcrwe secti�'it��. It v�ott:d b�e�losed a�'s:ixid�xvn, aiid C1��'c�n��ul�i in�t�II vtdea�ameras." 5c:ur�e: 1}u�tup i��ei'l�lis�i�7g Lii7lc�f l��tt�7't�il }�y Cliuck�qualx•z�Jia San Francisco ChrUnicl� .��Srif �, Z�][l: (;I��vr�n�•�rill...�ivn Ri�hrr,n�d :�n ��rtt�nt t��1��a�tt�l�l'�thc�a��"1'rail,a�ath thatt�rill e��en_ua11y encirrle tli�bay." Sour�e: Gh��rr�n,Richmc�nc�5cttic T�x 1�`spute 1U Lett 83 cont. b��avi� R.i3aker 5an Frar.e[scn Chroniele r��7y 1.�,��ra A�gilcnt See l�ilex7t 5�c�irit�-�'�nce Pl7otn ThG Frapn�ed Projec[; 20 cont. �w nuld chan�e tl�e d�si��ativn of a 2.1 acre��rrria�y of lbe sit��esigned Park and Op�n 5paceT wauld r��iuL�t�ie acr�a�e ofland d�signated i'�rfw�ur�parl�s i�i th� City," �uur�e�: Apple C�imp u�2 T��J��l;�t'�17.EiSr�ir�t�tlleut Im��zt R�pc��'t �un��01� Caanmcnt: L!,'e w��l d recnm�ncn�tl#�tthe C:�fabax�3 �reek'1'r�il be 3neated o�mainte�ance r�ad�n th�cast si�e �f the Cr�e�r;tl�t��Z�rkh�pi�ced i�n Tant.�u��vel��znent Phase�ji3uildir.g 1��ite t�re�l�c�th� 1.1 a�re park, Lett 83 cont. ,� �� = .. . • , _.,�+, _ . "�:� .. �'F=„ � }, �., 3;... :l '�Cr - »- ,.r � a:: r:: � •'!r .��,y�.v. - '.'�"..'ti' ..; �4; �;:7±ir.�.'J•;'�ti.-':.;�:•: .;�;krl.. . ��''� F"' ` �, �. . iNy�.+ h. j. �'�_� j iT'L. �i��j' � .1': •_�'�t-.. S�;� �A � � �� - •;s,�' � „ �s�^� u � x.-.,, �..': '� ,., 5 � �, 4'��!;'�;�f. _.�w�'.�,-M1,. ' ��'i.'�'i'�?�"r.. �, :� . �r �r •t?'.�'�h,'fi� -i � .... . �,i i. S� � ¢: 'F?�.. �r�j' +�; . ;� `x-`��' � yt '=i �i ,�r w;. �:� � . � . , ��,. _�� +.�..u�� -Id F��'� .i�:}rS, -'i�:.� s.�f�tl. -,1:1` . Y �'F,��.�..'.s• ��. . .`rniR.� ;,;r ��F �:�}'• '��3TS.� � .�i-' a. y, ��. "f '1, �. .i.,� �� .'�' ��;��.- "� ( ' � •7�r� � �� 7. ~� �y: �'�.�':.. �.. : ',Y''. « r •1�.7 � Y :�k�R�f... r ��,y st�r' � �r.� ?�� :�:�' t i �'i � ?��sr. •',., .`� � �.. '��.� �� :. ��-: ;�� - �. �, r�.,.� y �,. __:��. ��:` z„s� �� ;� �a�,�+ �i: �i,•!� "'f�F [�r''�r*J-: ,.�'� .� 'Y � �� L �'�•f�f��:fl5!'�f� ' ��='.? � � ��.� E: F!..,`�Y::,y'.•. 'i� � �f. �� G!.. ,f_. ' 1�i N+.ti �'q;''� . . ;Lt�' .;L;,fx •J.,�. • �"s: _s� _ :��y :�,i;:•t",•. ��.a�` � �F � .- ��i"-. � ��: '�+ �1 ��U•S . � q. y•.�._ ...� . * ' �f. ti�rtF�:;x�'. :.rf. ..tii� bjti��" f.•�J 4 � �.�12 �"r�;�.� � � ` ��' �"'�� . l�':� . . ,�3a�_ '7�`' • � ,,_l�,;,�; , �ri-'' t . � ��i� •, r'2='.'� °.i. S� r.. � � ..• �^:•� s•� . �• ': �r� . � -i ��!-• ?,..i �R :,�..�,.�r�� r.�+�'�1:. . ^f:�' r: �_7ti��.�•.:�". �k •��.r.�.��: 'i�. . �:.,,, �•r'. r +{��o-A•.=•:iff: s�'' �_� . ;. =. ' y,�"�l,r�-.• , . . � 4r�' ��3`�. /I,•�,4. :�:n� fj s�, �,��fT.,�,I. .�' °[r±. ,i�:�.�'�: N" F.. ��,r�+�E:�. .y:i i"r': .. {*. :;tY. �''4, �I�'��-',x�sk.'' __ x y: ' J;=•�� ti. .Y. .y._ �.. -. _ ,;�r: :jn. �, �•:_: . ��-; `F7? �� r�i . .''�''�'' �.'' .,+t£w• � „y �^fi-t �n�-p,�;- •..:f:. .,�_+w. :<t-.�- . +n ��=��r�;}`�^ _ st' -� �'�i;� `;�r" ��. - �r:��- • -. ?- c�,�V �gr :I�:. R� L=`:�:'-`::lyt iy �a^L.• .. �,�,r�.�-�r�. n...�ti'��r."� �:•�. .Y�k t�"' '�r ,�c'�S;��,�t. 'ti�� .�� ,�:�".`�t} �•.+�''; ..;;�`T �µ'•7'� N . . i' y�e r.r,: �!'-��M �''�'��'` S ��^'... �i. ,�°' T•,..•'' $ s k�_". �;, �c��° :i. Y:�;`;.k:� ::�;4 ,�;, �.. �; -.�;�T�-: z a. „ ��i:� � I.'Y.`C�.+K " Y.. M'rs� � r�.. �-.'-. � ;, 'k�'�� , � :� r�ity;r"4��'��'t�}t. �? +; ��fi�� 'C '•.. � a�:.•.r � �; •.�E:!'1§. �'s q,.y; ,1�;': ��i •�;r'` �F .�?.Srr;'. ...e.,.:.Y�'- L � , �, .��:c� � �, . '^z �, +� 7 7 �'A� '' .��Ip�{;r. .�F�{�ch��:� h.. �`�j!'��'. `.�, . �Yf�^'.�-• "::A .tij�"d:T - s- f,F•x a y�, '�- ):.� +Y r`:;:�j'i ,:S�.F,�,•7.1.�.y� •r �J''W�. v7:�+� 7!. S.-.' � �p y a ^f.f'._ g't?:C.4.i �r+. ii.' ��''� �.P J•-RfNf^...r a J.' yh ' 'Y' Jl;t�l�' t V I.•. _ =•,�,s •n.:£5 1f.:r aG',xr l�" .. - ti�' �r i;`?i.T� '�A.' �'S:(...�', 'd- �i �n,: •-�� }i:,�-,.,�:Q;.n1�� if �+-��:i} �'J•.i I f-. �'r'e.ti.<�r�y x!i=Rf.�rti-� y� .i,_i-.. �s�y�,."fr'.E�f'� �T;�„f�. �� ?�� .S.IF:1 1�5.i`�7-i'��r.". .�:�1+.,Y� `: '(g��;.r�; .t: � •'��`�4, � fx:.�eti7;=�:.� �x:r.ye.,..�i.�} y.,. .ir:��!'�C��4.' ,r.''� ' . �Y[�?.v,r.^�.7 •if'F:,.��"Y:`�ik�h�� .]��uiT.,t}r�;:a•:;:t:�i/;•��;�,.y..� x•.�i�r•�..,��,.Y .lY.:..�.}._��i: 7�! ',F � . (� F �l. ' ' i.b.:. --�'.:�'if,.•n :lt.: S�i'�_ ""'4+..'�'��•��:.j��( ';5�. ['�Y.�3:��i}�i'�'n'':.. 7�� 2.:a.�� 7_.r1-" T J, f�.�.H':'- +. rt:�i�f,'� J� �..'�. �':�: •' ''�t.r re�d�'r'Y� ri!S.Sk!'3 �'F'"H:��. `-i�{.�� r�c1�� y� ��`'.e, ' � .[t:' ��l•i•jL;;:� .:''jy:'�` 'l�•''iy`'ri',.g Cuf�f�"•_�!`�!!,.,fv�.��.L r::�':L,�'1..�:ti�. i �h��.. .:'H�� .�T:�.� 'F.S�:::;y��l:;.�:-=r:.' f••� .�3". . C ��i��.' '�''- u=� � ; M1 21 '� ,:;' ,, ,P. - - _ `;r;�".:-- :�;'� - }� .1r• ;•i�y, �tr'�' ��L� ��y' - �f :r' - �-�'��-i..:_f."'.:,,: �`w�;G ��,y 'p<::::: - � �� _ :a:'�' _ _ - ��q•.. - :�?ef►.•.,I�:.-�. �.i� - _ _ YYY ..�..�:�rry �f '•1�.,':Y:�`:^":�,�-��.�'.'�;�_�,��iyl�.J.':.�:w..:i�• _ . ',:♦ � :I:•. . _^',.:..:��.�: :.�'��:•��:�'�� • .� " 'I!�!.+.`. '. •::"..:.r'i�••'� 1•':' _ .; + ��.'1::.,��. . . . �. ..�+R.'�.=��.:.�.�� . ;J r?�+•:'�-..�::�V�t:�. V�'_'_ .':�4•r''.�'':i;:�•'!n . ;.��1r.::. i . � i:�:.;..y' `rt ` :'e�F�y'r�.'-'i.-'.^:.:::;y-.r.,::-� -:�.r�:..,.;,.�,.��..-".�i:. .:��;l�c� �, 'f ;•i��.. ":i "��,'i:�-�:-:''=`�-�'�;:'i:r!al!!.•::';_ :..., r - .I�� .�;j�: -:�i�'s�i ��; - I^�.''�';'r�:�,.:�,�.� i;:_: :!'^'.^�:::�;� ' - _ `�;:"'r^""' �. �:.'-'• ��,•'. ,�.r - S__ . !��_ .'r'.. ,'rf;'yr':�:; -- _ ?�'f•'i; �rl�',,��r��7;•.�`�`Tj1:'!'- V�;��, :�:..�f[.:�TC�;�i.';1i [a H.fI.•',."'_+� l'.� � . � :� . .1'�'��:.r.;]e :�='~ 1 _-. �,. +_ ' .Y��x:!�w��•'.�jl''-� .'� .y!M�!7":'+�� .x" ..i,.: �:�'.i� �: ..F'r�-. +., . � �',:�y��'i�� ,?�_ :'3:,.y :.';�.�'`"''.�";�:'�=.;�: .: - �-.;:��:.,:_ _ _:- �::'-f��.. `"�>.' ;;:. 'y�ii•':t:,,. � . : •� i�p'?±�::-:':'.J.i� . .,�� ►`�:�..��;-'�°_::��>,:r::=i:�-F:;�,:. y+��i_:.' �.. .•:'..'.�:�:' -�i��3ta34R�,�:.'iV,•.-�:;'!_!:i .?r:; .�,r;•iv•;;'' ��` `�•"e'.� -.}:�� i R =. __�:j ,�3' ,�.�'`9'�'`.'!c'`;:i','�::? y�':l;,, '� r � ::::,:�'1'y.�:- l , _ .:�i�''_�.�.. !-.k' i.rv'�y��. L'i,�.�_..r'.� �:��_:.A��,. '� .�t�� :.�-si:s'"v::•,`•"�'�i''r..,4�•�i.�;.":,r�•�~i,r'' - �.'. '. ..ST�" _��I!(�1+!!7f:;`,��.��a:'�'i.f'•.�;:�.. �7sry•'� ��ii=r-,r• :::• _.. '_ - ��"- �u:��':i'�,�,-s::-:e..' i.=,,.:�,::,[�•s. :s:+'.�,�:�s� �.��.. ' Y � �, �-:c•�,,'T;: ' ?�•.0� ��.�'�... . .. A !'1�i,��i..= �l't..:�, �,'�ti' - .. :;r-:••:"`�`1::�,y•,w.,;r;:: ,�;+:..V` ',J�-�`;..:� r_ -_?J.-"'f.�;�.-;c.��.__;..�.. :L'�;.:i �`�I^f .� r' ��4til..�::'L_�:�:�=-�.�.-:':_:� •:L.�':'_• ''.i��`.'F. •' � - �J: y�?.:_L':�:'t:��: . _.� _ ��..':�� S!�!�'" � . . , " -� `,�i.�.�' � ..jtV:., {, ;r� ::': .,•�,'�: �i„' - �L�,'r ,,��•. ��iS'-.::"~i!V:�=: � .'.�1'. : :�5 �� • i ;�"�}�h'�_.'_ ':�.`':"t:.�`��'�.�-:t��_�.!"�::.�. � ':1(�i:t''a 'r�� ..j;;,�...,;�:�.F.�;,•.':.�,_.._�rd.'XS:. -.. :� _ � _ . ,.. . �*,:::'i":;'�. ,,': �'•�:- i. 3.. {.'._•:�.�.�.:.�.i�, :L' ��'' .,�-.T•�:.':::�`i...-.�r::��•�.~.� ..�.:i. �'{'v�.l. _ .n�i,:::::- . .''n,.. _ ;�y,u°�`'�=f;�,r;;' j .Y� =�i,�:-;:,.-:•••�;'�';: _��,�:<";r!�:.: . `�''w�;��..:�` •�.�_t�::..��:,.�•n �. ;�:r.tii:�r,::�:J'. ,�• �i��?,'�'.;;.'.'Y`�°r�?�:��', s.E: .�� "� •-;n+;, y,r. K�,.;.,.%}`.°.. -e....: ^�;. > r. �y' - .{.' '�:-s Lett 83 cont. �'-1 I !€1�..;1-11L'I�IV I H � -;�::� r x'::_ - _ :;.+ ' - '�C,. y - f� -;;F', ;�• r•Y�� -.�,�'!.��' - - � •�• .. .;f.`�_.:'�;. �� ':- ��:.. � �:-....�;. � _ . -��..:� � ,� �' . ... .. H.' ., Yf,' ..':L:s:' '��....' ��:�:k '.. i r�� r�� "�'.;:r'.�':`..:'� . .. ��^:.. r �.��.:�:,. `� ,•6:.. i� ��.r�> - �a.s. Sv : •' �:.. E:' � L - � `•'.Y..-_�,zN' •t��= �.. .i�.:�.:...:.5• � " � _'i'.--:; •: _. ,: .��- � -�..' ••�''. .. �j`'f _ ��.. _ •:��.:'.�' . � . . � k- ,��.' '..�.� . i��N.._ ?�^�'�. � ��:}}�`� Yf';`.. y � __ ��"> , �� 7��C:�L' :. •{''ti.: n. Y �.,�Y :�i .�� - r��: ±,��, ` �'n. .� :':� - ;-i''. �:: � �:. ' ,,.. , ��` �� . r:r. . 'i: .. �. t'.i-: if:-. i;';��'"��. _ . �':��''. �_ ; ��$,.;., :-y� ''�- :i?^�?�';.,.:�=��.�L+� , . ;5-;� �':. �� \:.�'�ii i��4�� . ' �.N� 1 � �yy�,S.��h .-� Ps �.«F.t .�1A�.i;f�.� . � _ i...'�. ;:� ''-'S".�`�! . � _'.. . ,.. �,. , �:�;:: �� r i :{!...�. ;�, �,y.. :,� "'`��r�'...�'.k. •�,. �4: �"'�.yY -��'.4 �""��•�r' -,i:�.:�i. .__, :-�;:;i�,. +-�S� ��.`f �• � • r. � '" _ .:L:::::'- _,,... )' '..^i"i F".:� �3.r rg'. �'��5.�'.^ ' �V'.��.'i�•�. '"_r,,r. =:�F�, .� �._ .. :=:;:°'a{�.r `.. -f �Ai�� .t��u� ` Lk'��•:.' :;�' �' v�•�Y � :.�c-.� � .'.-'a:• � ,i; :.�•� r.y-y.7;�� ...:--r� ''i �•. .ft� :i:c�i:�� ' s r '.�"�':_c.. �� ,��r��.�.;�� - �.r '�.y°�' � . :. y. . :s;�: �r.�,• �•';�� 4,�J� =��. -• Y•f'.� '. � _ '.�Y'Y�^ '!:.••� ,��"��[ I.✓1.. �= r� �,,, =2;:-;;:..°' - '�. 21 �::�:. '_��-�;'��;�: �.-�r�'-.y:. ^,s'� .�}��':n�: '�i� - �� i �. . _ - �. .l�S. '.{�p:,,�gCC- �.T;�.r:: �.A--' � C�nt. '�1+-_ - :�7.'�r�`-.�� : -. '�-�- ��.. •� ��r . .•a:� , i�' • • ,r��rt.-'„ �:�:. � �� - _ . ;-.3`_�' . �:�s•;:7n",.:-;+i t!''' ;��` 'y � .R - •�.-. ,; r ,�i� �.i;. �-� '-��r�v�:rc,;� '� ��:r" ?�r • �� '�'_ � .. _ �'. �- .:i.'�, .�='�.-Y: -::."��y'��_ � ,.n:; :t:�. , `�5�-. .. `z� '�r' '� -:` � ie;•:.�:.. ��• ' ,'r'. _ ,,- `�':r ��"�:::� ,,.�,�...� � ;;�,: ':�, : ,:�� _ � � ,:;;�, ;:.�;,' ; ;.;s iN� . ° 'L_ '�6.!. . ...,_ �'[�1: �� , � -y:�h�� . - y '��r , _�' .. �� ', ., 5- - e;:r 4�� `..a��' '� ��{� -_r. �;.• eh.ni �� .� ,.+. ;�_ti•F �:.. .3s.,, � •�;. �� i „ry .��i � '�' - -. {lt .-�: .,�•� - +.F;T dr ��C;� . .. :•V��. ' Sr.��'..�� , . ,':.• Y . . . : � �:Z;•:.. .t ' '.�� _�,,{�--,�-'•.T. ,"� �-.. � ; ryr_• ' ';�,�?�� ,si.'::'' 'ii'�� .: „��}' ::�i'=:.. . .e�� d-�-. ,or � - t.��,? t_:: ; � ;�,:; _ : �.r..�;:• _ �ti` ;:_Ax: „ r.�;''r �:'.� _ a1C '{',p.° . ' 4?' �l'iS� . . . . .-. w. _ta'��.,�_�'..`a1�A . ... �� Lett 83 cont. . ;� � �., _ r,� j�� _= .: =� . � �' i�' ' { ' r�"� '" f � s�� Y �' ��Zr.� -- # �.�.� - -• .:.?��i'••-.'7-�.• � � i •.�� ...�';q.�"y�'yw fl 4 C+ ,�`.��-1`rE-f.vl��'!:'',-:7"....a '� I '" i.`' IR'i�"". � wk,-r-;,_; �r--�r!. • . �i �� ';�, � .;.g� ��r�-� � '�}"�� . �...; =2r1}'�a s - .t': �,� �� "� ;'y•-. p� - ;, ... ••L-Y � '.J�"I`�_ �r .i1T�'�ILa'�', �f��"��'•;��•� Jl � '�� . ��::Fa.l�.' �-�a?�: } '�" �)- n. ' y�'. ^` �'.��'7i' P 1k �L".�t�u:'" .•'...= - :'N�.� ti ' . p�j s�-c�{;,�t� .; .:''3:-,u,6,;'n`cF::'7 �:x +r, •� '�i. r�' ��•�-j.�--�-':�� • Ill I h, 9'.�.�' ' �n ci: �,'t�p ' i) • „��. e'�-'�`•a.� ^ . �; . �.�td}' :.., ;�,t._. '� �'S . - irr'� �• ' •` -.5��.:� • - ' - . � . ;�,� ;,'��?�s'r.. � C'i�:. • .. L. i;�=7��,S�F�. �•; � '�=r �.�N?:. ,�. • r3' . 7 v. ��'• . CJ ti� r � ��. � � • ��x'i+ � .-k. �•�;'r ';- :_::;1�'��yy,� • . ' iIl . 'g�.�:f;v?+'?.� '[.�{ �,:..c •:-�. �� i " . . - , 'rr�•fA:v x_k�6 '-.:�. `:'. vi 1�'� �'iY-y''�... �'e. , . ��_ ' y � ' � -.a':..,-.�r � - .-4'` r � �;�'Y..y�t,.�: ..�^.c•. .�'�. .:.: k� . . •i. . .i i�'�� .:i.i:,: �� .�n�.... .;�.,�;,� _, . 11 f �ru?�:'.-::9'"5� y. i,•,�_? �i; ��{' , � • �; ,.t �, �;• � �C-�j�'•f"�i:u':�:�^�.�v��'[i� , n�Yiy.�1��,� �'w�!'^� ,i:fi:.1!r S'?ii '".�. ..i �..y.�.L " - h"�r•i,�; r �i^�'� .e;�- i •� r� s=� �• . . . •r.y . x't:�-+. • y- ' - 'i.'� �3 ' •- 4�:•ti !�'�-�';��. ='� � 2��.':ihiC� i " . _,��'�'a��7+�:a'�R �_::�'�''�.�<�`�':�,�'sk. � 1 . �"�� ''[, ,yY'�i Y_S?'iY" ��''��y� T_ry^y�.�;,� " .:_l '�.k�y�rgw��"lt. Y�l'�''�'��Y�{ -�'�Z;.. . ' -. 'iF. I y� ,;-_-Fa� r�-dt•;.w.�. �,�>i� �. , $r' .N... 1,.. S��`.• � . .�.i�.,�r.•., • �Isti:��..�.._._..G.�-::`"t,� '�� .� � 'ti�...i.:�i:.fi:.+yY�i7i�!x':i:.SY='y{��n..'�� r r .��,:.:�� : •:% : . . . . T"� +�.�.sY'K.ry-�r'+�'. �} ... . , ... . . . ' ' . . � - ' - 1'':.' ='y=. .. •• . -. - ' :� 7�'. :;� �a��: .. . • . .. . . �•�i°'';;��; �� • ,: „�:...;`._� .:��` � �.a` ''`' '; '� • , " .� �:L�Y�..�' �f . . � 1'S"J_."" ' • r ' � ��,'.�:?: , �l• . � �- uA,�:;:� • j. 21 �rl � i_:r:4:.,JF-i`_-`�:i"'. . • ' ';ioli . ' � =7':�- . . .II . •.:S'°-`ij: ... - F C�nt. ; ' • . �:.+ �-� ,�i�:��y.i�ir�i�'••�:S - f �J �.. . .li:�."�:- c^ �� ...�f �.�:�� f �v-��' � `Y'`{.,r C�t �;5 ' ' : -.. '7�° �`'7��''S- I � . ' �� '- T��.�i:t`•'i ' .:L lJ �7� '•'_S.. �,t• . i ¢i'' I . . _ .. i. ''Z,:j�..•r=i;^:,�r�� . � �� ' • . -�. ..{ . ;1�,'C.'y•�iL��'.- : . !_: i� -i'� �:�:::''_[�� ' • i' �•�:r;,:�.r.� �� -T i��y�i:i_t _�w �!" - LR ' 'y ,iy,• • :.� . , ' �� I . +w.�a.w .. .. . . • • .ti � � �� Wre . ""t�.' � . ' 1� i•.� . - . " " . bn�i � ' , . � � [�.. • • ' ' �.I�. .i 't3i . .. . Y �] ;.� . f7: ' J,� • • .. • �ka ,� •• ' E.' r'� L . . ;;, ,; � - fft J . F,� _� � . . . f: ,;C, _ - .. li: :" ' •; . �.a�° I' C: � . • ' . �: �';d : ��. • ' ' S j ;`� , c . _ {�a � n. • . . i,i ' ' . • ' ' I 1F °� � ' . ar� �. �' y� ;it; Lett 83 cont. � _ r-;��=. + . r. i� �> - - � __ '[ ' =�e � " I�: .�� Y .I . . I' �.�.- '7 .L ! I `� _ �� _ , r,'h,^i� '«'�: , .. . ' � - - 'T'1•�•�� ,. � ' , '+'�l�f , � �: f i i � . '.. . �- r � G7 ' • ' � ' ' `' ', 11J .. , . �, .: �� . .....__.....- . , . �� ;; A [r) _ ._.._�_._... � �} . ' : � '�' ', , " ' ,�i • , - � 'I � .. �" "� " `: "7" i . . . �- ' . . i $+ �� ..y ., :y, .. . �4 ' , {` � �3� .. . • . � y_. � , � . �• r 'c • , j .. • ';• • : �� . . ' . ; ,1' �i� � . i• • i I,^,__.—.f',-I , � ��.} ' i. . : . �• � � r� • ' , ' .- - ';�.' �I. .. � .fr � ' ,j � � 21 ,• ; 5 ' ; _ - C011t. ' S , � -: i s ,�! . ' ,.�.'�t .. . " � �; � �? '' ' ' �' ' I' ' ' �: . - �: - . �. ' ...,. :� • , � �� ! . ' . ,• .. i' ;; _ . . .i • , i,�f . - � �.. ' � ,` : . - . � �� : � � �� _ _ � :. ,;. : - � � � � .. - �:� - , i ,.� ; ; : � . ,M �: - ; '. � . �_ � � _. ' '=,�' ;` �.; '� >' i- i_ � . ;,: ;., ,z s --r -� . .;1- .i:i:, � �s i �: ?- ' �' - , , � , 'I: • .. r-: •.... ... . t� �: �'� . . ' .. .. . . . .. Ak � �. C . 'r '� . , • ! I - � 1 � — •.� 1 �: . , .. , I. � iR �'� .. '� � • •+� +"rr ) 'I _ ;f ��'n� ;€ . � ,r,, •��+^ J 1 7 • " , I""� . i 'I [ j uh i _ •r f - --��. , •- .. , �. . • , � � �i ' ',y !:i- � �:� '• i ' ' _... . r•, . . '- . ' � _ ,.}. .:; ; i f 3 •" � ... • 'J' i:�.i' c ' �. �f� E�d n u . . .. E:; : : ;i '�� :�... ,., _ _ � . - � 'f 'S• i� �� I - �i^ . � .� . -� y �\ • j ' I ' - ? 1_1 � " - �1� ..•.S�• �� i' .. r. , �� Lett 83 cont. I I � .... :i4r.�qi{:[:e:s,;cV:�P+ n�_C y f . ' -��.,��'�.'� •. .��: IS��: � k � - � ,:' • "' . ..��.y 'b:��'�r` .. J. J;- �••-�;�K:� -. •.?• -..�7'_ra.�r..�-r'1,�� . �4.?'�'��,. .. ' r'' ' :�,�'-' if,- . r..t . '• .. �' _ � . . _ 's5"�- -=x-- _ i r:�..x. .. `i�• �':; '�'t � " ' yi^ - • ' 4. -. ;��.� r-r:. =w�+i- � ,_ ��`'��,` - ��-� ''+�' ��•r i • - . . •': i f . ' -r. '�f� ' :<. •` • i t z�c4i•-, � �i , > , =r:��'-r_ �;�, � ' : Y'�•�w: • �`�* ' .F'�'- . . ' ' - 'i�%�• �4.:. ^� �,x�� . • - . ' 'J.�' ��'"--,��rot." ,i•'?.��.;Yrr , . a . ' � ,..� ::. i�-�: � .�; _ - _ '�� ;�. -H'��:�; ; ::: _;:�,�,' , A� �� . . . � ' ,�`,�:; ,� � .��,,� . . ..�;� ��-': � : - ��,?:�;;<<�r '- . • ,•z._��,� :� ��'�' ._ •_:y.. ?r r�•s M I �. K y � `-.. ��',; _:.�h _:�. • . '. Zr, '..� �� ,{:.; .. . � �f` • ', • r_ �J ,,,��ccc�� ;'�:f : 4z 'Ls-� ��y '•�:• .' `",�-r 3, t.��- � r �e .. . . ��.f{�,�' �s. '.a�y,:..�:,.v�:�ri[: . , Gy A.i- -'.ti;;:� •x_ , . . . _ . , :y:%;'S�" S.. __ r. h -" .r ��• -_ .. ,=��y..-. ,,�'�-a_°_'.��.:��'r,�{i�; 21 ' =" ��,. �c:{.��' .n r•.,� �:�; � .,, .`'i,3::_";''�,��:-�C-�s; ,r,. �... .s�:r�:�- • .ti..: .�1.� . '�.:.: �..;.�;�2`�i�^+tii:'f•= :f's ,"`i°'�ir: ';�: �s . . _�." C011t. .f` . • : �. . ._ _ ''' —� . � - � , i �,,r,._' � ; � ::�_:a: : i � r i' �'76� ' f • �-ti�_ , i �....r��,�- ... A t�+7'L ' ::. 1 r,Gr 1.-rlr'.^.� � 4`-.,, .�li .�� --- - • �- Y vxrtrc-if "�1�R= z1x��r . � C51V^lc 6�Y1 PWr��+l?l.l�k � t w� �'`� �i K^, � I 19-" 'I �� 1' � '�� . ' �"- l�, I i _s_� ,_�. �� ..�_ � �.�.._.� Lett 83 cont. . ... ... ..- -------- --�-----.......... ... .. .. . . � � -� N � -+ � �: �— '� � � � ��. � � ' � �----� � � .v � .�_� —Y � i � 4� , �. i : i �' � ry � I d� � ' [ � _ �' ' . �. �� E .�' c.� �` �' � � � ! ��,—��, " I - ` �=_ � � ;�' i � �i ��.x�� '; �`- , � c' � i �� ; �� . : 3"�l�. : � � : �- � �i � ' �r : � � �� ` � , � , ; �s �� ' . � [ J � .,.ly �� ' :h� �� I �1 � �� , � i6; ' ,e�• j r:'�S � � I - S • . I�:_�' ' � V'v�- " i +i �` - � , 'I' •. ' � ' : } ,�i 9 C ' - ' � �S ' .:l t 3' ' � '� � ; '• �r.. ' _;. i :• � :? —� .�.�'. f ;.'i; - • s _ ..i:. � I � ` �- .. � ��"' ' � ! a f J ��: �t i I '�� : , i -'�e r";I . k� f:�� . �i�s;� I �ti,' - . " ' ' i =�;:.;�. � : �, . f ��.� �; � : : �;. , ;..- . ;,�� : :��= . �`��' � ;�. ... I ; � . i i , �� : - ,.� " � =�1� . � � � . ;,� I 21 ;�, :i-. ; � � i + F !,�:� I �; w C011t. � � ��- � ,��1 r� 'y �,��', i ��" :�� '�� Z � �+. . I=.LI - . _:��. j ' jt y • ; -'' �1 . -�;I � :�` .<:; . i3- �_ . ' i .. i�r� � i i _i �' . �.�.r � --. � - • . . �_-'-� �� ,�� }• ' , � �� _ �` s �..._.._..._'�.:—'•��- I i �� '�3�: �9; >� � �� ! ��: ��E ;=��. ' I . � � �' �- o s: I ' � 'S�`'i �c �__�`�__�, �'�' [; :, f:;��( • . �� l� � �-—; i �:;s �. � :'—' '--- f� ,�+ ' ;, �`= "�—� �a f�� .. ��~ �� .- -�-- �� ° � - ; ' : u ' r��r�,' f �. �; � ua :• '.••-'�� ; ;`f F i j ' � r:``rr 1"'. � I i,F� � �' � • I�. v : : � ,� . (•._:.�. :: �..�� , : - ,_::,��.__... _ ��'u—i� ��m � � - � F - �'� f� � �� g r �..,._.-- `� � ->�.� �. I � ; � �, � :��Y �3 _ '' � , _ Y � �i � ' 1 ry.. ' •�,. ,`� �." • L � �' ' � - ��.� �- L) , f N ��3.2' � � — � � v � .', ' ' � �-..•j - [�'rl ' 1 � '! ^� ;; ..I . �I } - . . � -r a9 ` . .I�. � R . y, � � ' a ' .�I � + •_�.• � �. :,{J � . ' � ,� " ' � �.�J �. �. —�-�: 4 "1.�' � 7; � :� _ � :� , . .�- •� � i _s � .� ; � ,4 . I_:':":.:'::_=` � I o r rr � =: • • � a •- $ ' �- ........-•�- r < — � .I �� N !..�••- ---� � �.i r� 1 �: L.--•-•-•-•--•-._._....._ - ----------- --- -- - •• � � v'K. K Lett 83 cont. .. ... . .......�.�. r Y � C• � f: I v i i °' a ;�' U: ; �� -�-: � _;�� r--- ,. '� -f �: � I ' .��N —'_—. � : y I � � r� ° � , � FRS` � �''J '' � � ° I � � 'o a:u 'r n�- _ '=� _=� 1� � rs=. y i� , ,�; � �� . � : y A�� ? ;a ^ � _ � -� a; i �-- �i`, � �'µ� n a� � � i �� V I � •c�- �'�� I + � � S � L � � o . � � �l i : v� I �� ' • N ' � ,�'� f�r . ��{�3� � I r 's II ' @ i � - E ; � ; � a � g � . � � � s � � � � � - � --- a s� � A � - . ; � � _�i E - �i - � � � � �� • ❑ W i i � F ' � � B �_ .� _ � 9 � I�I� �: � . ` a. .�: � 0 3 � [ 1�5':1 - - � IR � C � ! L :r 'ti. � !� LG �?-"� ry ' � ""�'_"__" U� � _ " __ � 3 � g � '� . � � -y�,' � [ m � a� � . E� I ~ � �' �; $' �w �� 21 I �. - � A Y I � � �� 9� .�,y � 5�. �,� � , cont. s� n= � �� ' : �-�,� � r�'� �� g� � 0.G]�., c� �,^ o� n �� ..� ;�� . ii. . . , ; ., - - - - •' ' , I ;. ;;....:r �. .i...,..` ....;:. .. ;, , .. _ -_'- ' ....-- • .... ,..... - ... N.-; I� �:� .J::: •.i� _"��_�.. ...- ., .........�....i.y'..��r•-•-..+..+��y l � •�'i�i1Si��i: 7C['iiiiiiiLi�Wf.:�"sm[[m�f' W1IiL�� . .' • •r-•'=f�� -�..��. � �t :r �., f!A 7�T11��1��'I.Ifi� � _ ;}�; ��ua�� .� ' � .�i��; N� �ui�_u�a_o��_oet��°, . ,.�., •��,�� .�_��-..� , �`�'_ : ,, . �s:,�... , � .�. �f� r� :•.• _ '' 3S - . � -- �', ;��' ,'{•i�� ? iY M1'� � �-i- i � � 3R? 5�jf'} V '�I y� �.%Sl� �,,�� Q•: +� �, K� ��i �'Ir. �'r ,a � }. _�i��: / �.� I !"�] tr 'i:� j 1 t: f1. `�; •'� .„3 ._� �[;�'<I k - .tE� �eE;:� i iSt:_ � �;: ,.� :� I�,i� :�i { �_�*� � �.??.al---". �3'a � r•��'� � r• �t' - � �:'}... �..��' - ' �r;� • ' I% . 1° ':�,'• '-!�.�:.�'7'�L �iA:�.�:�-Y�-s __�:',a:�'� �r,�. � �:i.�.'. ,' . I}�� 4' '��;.;. .� _ ,6 -i:�>, ." .1�€� _ . :_�,. �_ I 'r I. �.--r�r.. __rk-'�i�. - -- _. _ •'�—•s��`'__�}.£_:�l'.'-�c;Y .;.:�.�..t�f: . . - ----- --------- - {-�.=,� ' � __ ------ — _____�r - _ _ _____ ________ __'_- _�� '•i, . . .�-�� _ •��"'" ...�_._.�: AT�.__..�..L�.." ........ - _ ti�,"� l .f' . . 1� -- �Y"x'T. �`_�R..-_- -.,.�.dae'��'[ �'-�-`„ra:.N�Y: ..... � �.�: r: .��::~; "a;: ,�j�^r _.'.�•� -- F '�`- `�`�ti'- `e,�: :-. ��% j�' �lI ��' � �' k=.��•.- �'� �� - I.,tiL.� :.� .�1 `r•r�' '��`': •i�.=`��._*: ;'��---,�,�� :��_'�= _ . ,, ; _ :;;`�'�" �� , � Y _ .. �. �-�� ,�` •'`_l � • _ , � lA�; _ #�, ,':;. , `�� . .� :1. �, •� � �� : � ';; yF�r i. �r � •r�e��j' �ati � \. e '�3 ;i�Y f+s 7 I �•fi �• r? �, ��-J -- �: ~�` � j J�,� � �1 j � .[-sl ��'�� `�:� ,�r_d , i �� ti � �:�� i. . f i ��• i � ��c'i ,��,�, -' -- IZ "l. r'�_ �� '�-° _ !� i ..� �` '.,Y 7..��. � �. :.:� � . �t l,f �r� ' � � .`� ;i�� '-'•��'- :�"�.�'��-�-^�r' .!f_ '•:e��:�m�lll]11L'lL4'..�"7, ��i. ;��;'S._ sa 'r �. � .., '- . . +d . . .r;;� tiyr . r,• ,`� � - �`";��_�:�� =•+'�:>..' -:i�'-y r , ;!•..' -�+ ; -•��` 1''`, ~• �'�a, '�r ��_�,,: - _ _ •':t�;.. 'Q - ,,�'�'- � _ °� �^ '•?, ; '`.. �,� �.� -- f� • �� < . � _ F I=i ; ~ :y-r�C `'ti� . �L�� f� � ,� ��F �.� '.�� .� �: � =�~:t��]�-.r �_�.R� ^� .J, .!.' ";�:. . �.I 1 1,' _ ., tiyti_�` y�; ---"��__ _ _ ti. f. ;�:I �. r • "•r�^�,. .. ��ar�t'•� ' : _ _�� : ,,,:' �' ;..�y„� _•t' ,.�. _ _ ,;:. _ .,..;. ...� • . ., . ....;• , y.... � .- : : , , , .:• r - , ,.. ...:.,�. . . ��. .. • . � . ., t•.....::.. � -� �.�. .. r . . ' ':..• i , ... ..........:.�........... -- ••---�--"--.'_'-`----�....:.:........ •�:� • - ! ��' .... . �' - --. -... .. � � I � ' 3 I � - i � '-" a : ' ` n -1 � . .... ... ....._..-••---•--......... ___----- - • - - - - - •• --i� , -� � - Lett 83 cont. 5�c�ril� Prun�ridgc Avenue Ui'�Ft �:r��irc�nrnenta�lmpaet hcpart cansid�rs t�r+��T$�p�.rai'e presj�ct altcrnativ�s: T's1�srau�d cQnsider the I�e�i�fit�a`�flnib[ning thc}ri��sct�Prc�jcctwith n n r.fn�nr•e�F 1'run�r;�� .�l<<en ue l�y retainiizg Prur.cr:dg�r1�F�nt��at i[s�resene�'<�de�nd extc nt�in�t�e A}�pl��lpas � p�er Pt•uz��ridge.[lvenue. $ecurity£er.ce��nu�d be th e saiaa�, ScL �tt�chcd 5c�tcml-�c� 201I iettPr in �P�p�n�a i'�s rn�rironr:'��nzlmpact Heport S�r,�in� �7�7�?�Z�S�l��i�'1'�� omial�nts: 22 i�la�azas Creeki5 nnt part QF f�he,A,g�ple prope�-ty; C�labazas Creek is 5�nta Clar�i�vun�v W.nler Qi�l�•ic�i pcxrp�rEy, P�rbloc p�op�rty, The existing f�n�o�ry Sant��l�r��u�ty[�t��ter District rest�•icts ac�ess tn Santa Cl�r��Cnu nty Wat�r Uistrir_t�rr�p$rty. '�'h�set�irit�fence is�lates t�2e Sa�ta I:l�ra [:nunt��1�i�k��r I.li�ti'iCi'p��ptrty f'��a�ir the A�plg��rapu5 2. it i$�ssunued thatllpple Evill�onst:ucGits nwn tcr:ec on its�wn prop�r�adjac�r�t ter tl�e S�WLVa�r��crty af f�alaba��s Cr��k an�i[s,f�nce��SiEltin�im diial fencin� App��m<��+ ��ct t4 pr��de x security Y�u�rei-aone o�i iits pra��a•#y betw�e�i ltye�w�f�nc�s. ��both sldes�f�h�Sanea �I:�ra Gaun#�44�at�r lli�trict Cal��az��reelr�rv�erry rhere is a 4C�f�et cetha�}r. Se� Site Plan �-5out,� T�gure Rfl—5h 1}�'�d�En�ir�ument[mp�ct Repprt Tv�ie n�orth�est4f C:�Iahazn�Crc�l�.thc C�-ian��ri�+eu�Ay�virx,a se�u�ily check�oint�n�h� ��arlcinb structure creat,��n�p�at b��ffe�aoue 1nd ther�is elev�t��3ag�'��t�y,ltl� Gorp��'at�Auditceriu�n and apgrnxint�T�l3�GQQt I��L UI�J�L�R S��tE.+�U f�i�M�i�l Bik]Iftldl�. 5�c tili'0 l°�x�r1�-SUllltfl Lett 83 cont. ,•...ir��n�t;ldcrrcit�rn t� �h�c�n�it�ecri�,g firrn'�r��,�ort ar�t�c matt�r, �h�z��p4rt stat�s �hen•4n's s�c.tirily cancQrns cavld�� addresse�i easily." �.,.�fenc��t�ail�tirould Emprave security. 1t v,��uld be cic�sed atstiindowr�, �nc� Chevrfln caulc install �fl�� C�Tt'i@t'85." ��urc�;: Dus�up fJvcr M�s�iii�Lir�lc�€Bay Trui# by Chucl�Squatriglia �an T'rrneiscn f'Itirnn:r.la Api•il l,�C�[,7 f:he��ron F+vill__.�itF�Rirhmnnd an easem�n.t� h�Jp�Q�i�.�l�te tize I�� '3'�.:ly d p��1�1�haC v�fill eve�n��lly enc:rcic thc b�5�," 22 5�urce: �heva•an,Hichmond Se=tle`;a�D#��t� Cont. �J� r1�1VJL1 �.$c1.CL'F ��z, Fra�►cisc4 �hrnnicl� [t�9Gy 13,�(}if] Saan��ri� PLf13L[{'LY�SC:[:ES4ISLE{}PEN SPA�f: �'}'��ri�ac�l}r ci�t�Yea o�ec7 s}aat�t•vithin LkiG�tr�;�cl.�lhat is ta��ccd Glon�public rig�isTo1=-s�r�y ari� �ctjt�tri a�7 sid�tr��.:t��,��allczvayrs�nd�la�as sr all be �-su hlicltiF acce�sihl�_ Th�a��li��t g)�al�P►av�i-he rig�t tt�c1std�lis_n anci t nfr�ric r�asana�le rule� and rr�ulation tar the us�nf the npen s}�ace. (PR��CT-5P�CIFIC CflN�ITIQN� Sot�r�e: C:tv af hiauntain 4'iew l�inc�in�;s k�c�ai�t�'Lar_in� F'�rmit fnr.�ip�3ic�tinn 9 Z3-��-R 11p['i12 G,c��13 P��7 -�,. •4��;�� _-- er� �g -a r�7� - � rr =3�.�� l+.� ;{�,� `� � [w:_� � • �,�i6 •JS �•��:J. Y •. ,_-��'+tih�� •�•i�l=��-�-�T„_, r S' !j" � n..:i y,.• [�_ q �•i' ,1 ' - r�'�� ? .i� �y - t�:S ��;�LY�.'• y. K 6 '�-'��a,y'- � , �-4 i J.. �!�• 'j�•'� .,Y,S'. � "�� i ,�y[�in��':: '��rr1 f ��. 1�. ��' .•s.Y�. ii i.r (;*r;y� .�� r,w��h. -`� �y��.__y� ��. - !f u� z,_ �• � e'�1 �,� �� ; Z �.�._ � ,��, ,:. •�' � �s�� ,'��`��n? �.�.s;.,'!=:�s'^' ' .� �,,r� 6 �� ..�,y a k�r: . s--��'�T� •�� _ ;". � -'r�y '�• �.�. ;,`�.. �"�" } ;� , , �� _ . �_ ;� �'s�^� ,z;,��,;_' •��' •�� „� .�-:. .,�4 �. �.:_ �� •�,' .e�,�,� �.. YY�� .'��'� ��.�:��+ -��,x=�,�:.��,- y� r. ��p ry' ' :.r.....z ., � � �%w'�:� � �� !� ..,��,.w�e7�� . i�xy'Fy �.'9fil. a �!��''�' �b+�`sv.$4Y� � ��r'� W r � ti � �y�, n'S.�f- R`u '��4',-•' ��A�,��: 1� R•7,�-+'i^` y tL i.[• _ �'�� '�1� 7'7�" ; �� a .q �. .:� . �-7.��.a� '�'r - + �._' -�!'iY�:'��•s..�.a..�Y y�. n': ! ±:��r.-Li�._' �c�gj,�s'r� 'a t_ .. .' � '�� ' r.�r�M ' . ']: •�' �4' a''� y �:'." �. � :�, . � i: ,. +!�y .�. - .i� F� st: } 7�t' � • � �� , "�:`� �} �;` y� e3Yn ^�' �5'�: ,�- •r• �? ti. ?{e 'x' xi�` :�. �, � � y.� +�_. ' � �t,y: � u ' �+ ��. �. �i`.`#'3._� �i�,,. '�� :��•, •'+ e., �, r R , }I{+y:...�r¢�'�7d d �.u+ i •:f. :'ir' ''�},'F+' .w5 :.i� ty� � J� �'f-;i�; f.��'A. ��}A]rc�/�� 7,�]-'; i ..�4 -' f'� i �!7 '�4^~•`�" A' n� 1'•`�•. �Y!!. "k :�'�/'- �A�4�:'�•� 1•, f�? ��S � J �rr r �„� •lf�� i �' ��Y'�.,t, �� 1 �'3 s i�'" � •�• .e�,. � �'��Sf iTJi�� .i' 'a ?_ f� . Ic• . i _ ''i '�. 'T' ' ,' :��r ^�.��. 'Cla F.j�+ki•a' ' '• ".. �+�� .. ,H • � '�. A. ��,t' *ff' �L�-a ��p�� ' .Jl '_' " �' �� Y^�,'•.,-•� t - ^ y�� ' x:•. K;� ��;'�j1+':�. ��".-�S ••,� � -ry, •• -• -� � �ti:"._ �,��L, � '+' �` �f " ��4:��Sr�,`, �'��r� 3' a ..; �w. ��:' � � `, •'�. ,S�{ _+•. �, �•jT,$�� ,•- r('� :'%.� - �d., �- .,��'. rl•��. -.:�'�• �.f..: : '7'ti:- 1•,' h �t�`A �� '..- .�,+,p�'''� �:; '�,-.�};� �C:lr{m,x. ?., .lf�'-'. �-' ;�;'< �� .�.�. .k-- � 4g ... ;#e�t' � : it4 s��r� �"��' �c�'s.$� �r..fk ' ati�•.`_:. •- •i��~ ' ,irl �'„r�4 `� I',., �-�-.•� 'T' �;��,,,�'•:� '!^��' y�, � '��'•. ��. - � _ z, �'�' �+ , ��ti ' �Vf '�i�� ' r .� ` ,7 ` ,;��i_ .�a 7;. i�s�s^�S'�'�. 3�_ y:� �' j` .'� :�' ��'� - t•4�� ,,� � � � '��Y` � �� Y� r �' ��a" ,3:'L :,xa�!;z.tdf' �r'� ' - � �•' � .� -- :s { � � �:a''•' �• •t y,�-��_ � '��ir - :+-:�'` r-�'��,�. �'i.'.i?" " � V r �'r�:�.� - "= w.<< - - .'�`i� i�� r_-� '"�}.. . {'! � �, i�Y:x= n t .`�r�s � L �.�� ;�.'{�, :•�1•' ,r� ~:r�-�� rY � � ,��,�1;:�;,;;� - �� . _ � �.�:,��,. g -, ,. . .r�wt. �cr. �• :�1,... {�1 �r.r:� y w M� �� '3�� F .v �.�s°! •��•L`• _ '. _ �-,, . �� '` •:- „ �r "�'�� ';d,Att7,t;.,. ,^�"�;�� .� 'w��' ;� ��i-:: � - t � • � �, i =�� _ aw.}tlY!�.4 a i �r' r :{g�� .��g� x� `ei� � r ae^� S 7'i � '�;�!4� :-' i • .__ p. l:1�� . �r5' '� • � � �'r� +� ��" , C.C.S'•' ..�..d�=:;'+''T.�� L _ a r.r' ,41_s��a� . .F''�` !r. :7.c � ��:' � �• �.. ,�l��<��'{� .�i F' k "` r. �., � : '�: .L�;��;� .�jj•� ' � 4¢� �(' a,ti.. F �• _ _ W.9 :;�. "[e'j1-,:� °•�i,"y^ �r�i�+'*f,r'.^�.a ?�;=7y'" �' tle �w`-��1��: ,:c�..'�1. Gv �i�Tt fi' " i 7.µ°yriFS��, ��:i� i 5• . �4F1`.A r�. _ _ `� ,g}+',-•.^.• �3 .. _��::' ,i:�. 'A'!� �=��.. .1!i: d ��4 ,i�il• � f�' y +�{� _;., �`r ' r k a � �F.•. Rt ', � ;�S�r v`��y,��:- _ �'" �� , �� ' � � a..�:•• �ti 4�:� � � .. f�yr, F �3� � �' ,.1�,,,�'7�°�y ',�;�� 'I:_ �� hN.y '�} %ia'� ? ' • •, ti°ir 1%:4, � n .. . : , •� i '7{��F t �' .� �J 3:y,t yr�p - �`� ir�`,�,'�l�P � if�' �'t''� -.�!e 1. .��',� .T'��i�_ = ' ` � �1 ,� ° `�: -��r u. "�'i`� �!�'�,. " �.li�� :':�-'.'k-"=, .�`.��•1tT;?•il Lett 83 cont. �...� ' . - , : . � .. - "_ . . .. •� . -..�i' � ... . �4.:5.6., .� � y � � � .. y-.. . � . . . .. . • . , .. ". . •.s'.R- . F .. .Y a ,N�• "i �{p�"! ... • ..n - � - •• • . . _ !� +D'� ' Y . C.�-' � ' . . . ., ' • � '. . . , _. " ... • " ". ' ��i . - " ' " " „�'�J �. ' . ' . . ./r � 1'. - • - ,. , .. .. . • . �•4 r, ... :' =� . . _ � . . . _ " . _ � _ _ • q � q .. I l JJ .. • . '' •` • ,` y`, . � '' � rt. - - . . - ' .. � . . r. � '�. 'F[. . _ ' ' • :. �� 1 � ! . — � � ' ' ; , � i '. ' I . � . A .. � ' •.e a � 'I R • � • i � '• •• � . ' . . . . i • , ��ti 6- • . . ' , � � � � - . . r ' . . . •'L ' - : • _ . . . • . . . " f . • . , ' . . . .: . _ . . ... . . . .t - p = .,� . r" ��: . . - . � i • . _ `�e�' ;a` £.`, • - -�VN - ' ••i • � Lett 83 cont. . ..._... . -----------�-----�-----------------�--.......__._..............._....__......_....................... � � " I �, G �F � — I �� . S �,' . 1� �1 � �.F #r I;r�Ey.zh`�"-+4b"�7+"�� y�i;Hf��" .K.35:�'J�� ,1 U � • •� .'y"""A• M��-. �.i-.. ,�.-F�:,-��ri�r.. .-�ij��.M.-:.d � •� ¢ � � . � �4 � ��C .� P.R Y��, x � tY �' .� `i •�: i' , a • '_' '�. .L Sti �,� "�1�• '_' X S �r � 1 ` � . w ' �: • .. .. ... . - . . '��,'_O.�r.�:;;.°� 't�„�,.�..�°:F..o-Y-d. �,,. .'�`�,4.�5.�a� I e: :�.. -• ' .._" -..__�.. ..: ...___ w��.�.i.r. "-' ... J:tiui+"l.f.y.: , 'f' ^-P•-• -•, .. �, •�: .' . t. .4..•_, ,,. . ::4 ,s y��x - ' ... �� x�v r:� •. ��v �:�� i._,��Y�..o�r.,� � ,.�r�'A4"'�'��'�a�d��•:''-` c� �. .y.::S_�`vy4:� [°y. ..�-i.f� .:ffi .. - . �� . n �?_°' .�"_'a :� `�'• � y� r� _ e' '.� ry:�, .;^'t::`:•. �:��'�.�� 'i � � i� , '�� ;� � �_ . . 7,' y ,�_,' . '..�4�".r'r. �T s..�.m+ii ...^r..r�'_�.-'R IX�;.�cvt$_�+a:,�' _�i"'.SS`t:s' M• . . "p•_. _ -i.�.��_ ' �v.;� =�' x. , . 'S•.�.: �•. y �-.V.��_� ;,�1�v � °�#�y'�� I �S -'�•' �N F _x � '•� �'9�� ,', •1: �ii"r�k .kG ;�'.,. a.r• ., r "'��'.�'tS'' _. � ...� ,,,u�,v�. �� _PS,o..on....� i � -.t> t _ l.�'Yi:l.�'-!g' A��',i�rry; ' ��t `,.� :. .�.,.A L ,�.,;- � ••,F7 . �,�F�.�-r y ��ev�.. � '��,. '""•G�7'n�.V��]•'ns." 1�i I .y7 $�[,'.�:_'�'° - .I_ � ,F�'°f`'•'��054�S . ' ' I 'A��`.�....k-'e � YqSnQ,.• �•' �.' - Z� �`�Fgr. � .:�• y..�: � h' '.,7""� �.f�i T '�'��'•�:'d::�' ��• � �;�.:ii�' • ,:. I - ��:-`�, u",.-�.J�.�it� . ,:.;%. ; : _JY��^ " a. �� f. .:�, .�;f•-��q� �y ,'� i .� :��i;iF a,�'�.�i� ��d- i I �; L��.;:�,�.. _ .. €? . 23 _:'n�'�c:f ,'�.� �,~�q I COI�t. - :__ _°��" ,�':r•�_;' �A�':- �.'f { F�� r:.=_ �?a� :. ' �> � ;� _:z,�#��''.,ti; �� ;f;. "�• `;__ '�r' a''� I ,j�. � :i9'.��•rr�`°. �:�� - �f i ,``3 �_� �3Y-�I l'" � '�k�. .: > ��;�� ; � � =�� . � . � � � � ; - _ E 3 a � � ; - �� L � L �,��', 4 ; � � = s � a X r �� '_ � y – �c r `� E } : r: t � � . ; i � Y k ' ��- � �} f - 2 0 � .a �f � F ' •' .�t ! �� S •• �" - y J � r .3 � a _ 4 � f � _ 5 { ? o n � � � � a� 5 3 i . :i $ � � .r _ ". • -. ' �� `�' � .. �r ,� , - ' -— - ----- - ------_�...---- .............. ..............._._.._.._.._.�.-..� `�� i.� Lett 83 cont. �ir. �a.ti •.e ' _ 1 " - • ' , ...`�.-.:a.-�� :s.�,.,,:•Y - --� ". , • . ,.��6 ..- � . � ' i . - •';�,_s:'� . �6'..a -1 'S �y"� t[� ..• ' �\" . . ' . • .>'�,, "� 1 ,��. .. . . .. • o .' F'. • , �' . ' S� � 3 •, . � ' • " ' " • - �• � ;r . . . .. '' ' �� .� yC ' , , . •. " " "4� .. �- . J� .... . � •\F . �Y.�� , i f . • , `i .. � �\ 1 1 .i . . �l' � . .. �` . f � • ' •'S: •, ,•��, ''� b yyq5 . " - " "" �% � ' ..d., J}' . � . . 2 „ . . ' " . ; , , �'�, . " . • • . , . r .. - ' �� . . , . : - � ' . . .. . . II . ., .r�. ,ti" � ' I . • . t I F . •.. . .-z 4�: . � •• - • .- .. � ' � , , � ' ' r . . t 1"l " .. ' -. • ' " .� " '. a .. ,S'��:"". +, . ... ' . • "1. . "� � . " . . " " f . . _ " �- . �Y • • • � . _ . ,C "f� " • rn �" " � • .. . .. . - .. • I �'3': x � . • . •- ... . ' . / j- - .�'' • ... . . . . .A:,� " " . �`� . . � " . Y-'� . .. ,'y.. .^`��`{fii q �� , - . -,�.. • ��',�p +L ' ' ' !, r f, . .ti�Y. ~ . ..,. "�a/^ ,iF.a • '"`' _'"` � - '�.•'.',. .t-'.- _ � • , r• ti" - . ,.�a. . . _ - �•�• .• . . :.,: �, _ � 23 �-� � . . _ ��' � ;� . . _ -. � �,. � , . ..��. . ._�. . ......_ . ar;��,�.:..:. . :. . ...�. . �.— �� . �:.,= . ': __ cont. • � .�".�Y -�f�i'1FY•.:.:�i.l• . . ' . " .. - . � •�' • - . .. , � - - � � - —'—' . ' ' --- .. .—'-" " -.�_.:.��"�'_. �_.�.t. -... _.....r�.---+. - ' . . ; ' . - • i+.' ;; '�• - • - . , � :� ' - - - • • . • ' ' . .. ' • , r � 1� : t. A , }'`'. �, - . . . ��.: :'�;�` ' ' aC.� 'A ,� ' ''t., . _ . . H • � " . - . , k-� 'e�a � . • - _ . - .. �'�'r^ - - .- -..., � ...... . ;: :..� . . -•�.s ...... . . , �. . I i rr".� n��. . . �f. r: "" y ii . "� 1� =x,- � - •' - . . . � . .3• ;:b i :s� � . _',�'• ' " ' � � , �� Lett 83 cont. � i � i--. ..�,;, u � �i=i �� I I ��.I III :__Y; �_:� � �, r - � � ! `,' '�y ! !�1, sf � � $ I ll�� i•I ��'3�1�''.� y' �i �, s �� •i � �i : r I '�'`�" �� ji��l��,, �:i _ �.�...._ •�` ,g ili'-d�Il� oil��i �;� e��idi a� �g ��x� i4�� ;.,, ... —J� ;,; a��— --�.___ __ �� = _ � � ��' � � r; f ��: � � �:. ;� :;=r:�-- --� -..... .. -:- ---: ; - --- .� ;,;_..,�...,`,.��.--.,•;�:;�=---------.-_...-_�,--_ 'I ; „ ' .u�; :.r::��::i.i r • " �:: - � --� a �t q` .=�._.. r� , �.`!.._ , i . . Ir ,�;� - £ - •;-• •8. �. :�__ . '.1 . �� ' � �' i �! � �, � g � �;...� , -S' +j- �'ti ! :i:A Ir .... ....T .... .. =� '� .. ; . . .. .._ y—.�-. -. '_....i_=_ �!` . - ' � � . _.. --�.—` - ` __ _ ..1.�n�:.�-�ti..nrt•n•-�_Y" - .... '"' . • i^� : .�': 'µ-'�'r �" ' ' ��,:... � 1.• ' _ _'� ' �"_�"'" —_--_��-:_........ ... .... .... . . '•• . " I � _- ' _-__ �:'.-' '.' �� , � _� __�-- ;F.:.� _ : ., � "\I� ,�"1': � F! ��,•+_ � " _,$„ '� � � � `y7 ' . � I �':�' i �\ � I --- � . ....... a. i - - .. �.,_}, •, t. �. � i ��?i� - - - ,� �j ��.. .� . f� '; : ':�'� _ _.`..- >i�� "��"S�'Y �• "�---- ��: . . I . �:;��-`. ' :;�s;� ': �; _ '':- _ ��.--,.._,�-7': E �: . :t`� . 1. ;.n.':` �_ . .. .. . '-��-�-.:r:t-:�...:i y • �..� i�:� �- � , . - . �;_�,�_ -... �w��rl-' Y�;;• ,.-'�;;' . _r_ . ' . •. �1 - .�"�. . , . - �1��• •: .:J.:� . ��- . ?r:;._ � •-.,- ;'F-::• •�J-" .•;;' • . . ;`_ .. r-� '??.i�: ,- •�� . . :i�.l. :F� ..� .. . ._•�'q';+�' . _ , . ?�• • - _ °:',' :v. 8y�j • ^�`. :.1.-:-� .. ':+ . �1=E• ' • - • n-n�•t . � "' '"�"''� �f'J, .. ^'.!�, . ' ' '' ' ,�: �.:;;:>` ":;:: . • � • 23 �'x:� ,,a-� -' ',�I? - J^r(� . . ` ;;�'�, . . _'.'_. - .. . . ' - . :��., ' , :.. .,; �.::�r�y;� �;'�• ,':a . . _ : C011t. , ,• .. � ' � �X\bf�.x�i:�' ' : - �•- '.a�...' r • ' • , . . • : ��. _ •"p..� ,:':;�_;;�.' .4• r . .. i �. ;��,'�: .:.; . 'i' '�'�: . . � , � ;�:.,�,`: � ;,R:r' �. . . '�� ' �1�1 •�f� '�• �:.r •R , �• f • . . ' . ' _ . • 1 � . ;il• ��=; ' ' .,'� �,��; .. '�r:'� _r,��. , . • i"�,'�'�--' -'r"-nii-;'�" ' . . • . . :: � ::.�1 s�ij•:•'� .: ��!�. , . • ..- �� _i.�,=i'i '- �� . . ,,,�� . • t-- l�'.- �. ' ' _ .. . . .. r'' . ','', .z'r� . ... , • � �',l'=, :'i: , `-'/' � i .��vr"r "-t. y' .t� �� `'k � ,� """� • . • :;=� � � ��;>� ::'� � . ;•�;_.; �= �. _.. ..�. .. � ',� ....�::y �3�. �: .�`,�`;:. �:'s . .. . . . ----- .� -x .. . ...._........ . . :�� ;�' a � . �: _ , y �" ! ��ta• ��: ; . � ... ....' . ... ... . ._.� �� ,��V .. . ..... . . . .. ..,. . ; _ _ ; �'!Y �} � ��k6 R � ':r. • � ��f� �'f '�" t�6.�F�� "•� I ��. '-- •-- . . 1 �.j�61i;� :,� ::i � �,�►r�Y� � ,�'• � � ,£ s �` [ ' i:[ i'; `,��.•�e��•;��F.� �� i �I � � ' . � ' ' ` �ji'• r� �'�� '4 y ��\\� " .. � 3=�i��•�jl: ii� �'r: .{•�.:��.'�}'-��t :i i I P �:: - j: :;�j�:`I: iE i�i j�s-,�`,';'e-�[r �.i�� e,Y�� t ;\;� - . .. .. �:�•�i�li�di l�l:�i�i �iE�:�=7�,,i..,�`?yi{�a., c i i:�� .i�1",�,�!;:�=3�::'s 5�tl�:�-!�pht�i'�q"f 5!a'i� _ I�`u;;�:I'.__. _.. .. ^ .. . � . ' I f __ Z i � 1 � � � �r '.i 5�'. � � _ a: i' .4 � �� J ' �� . _� k �•ti r: �a � ; .s ,r _ _ - • . i , •} • - , r . � r . � .y .- �it�• e,}: - •ab•r}"�e ,Y,a.. -y. :, s..-ri' .a?�'::� - � a��;� .�a�2s � �'=��•,;��,?��!�'�L��F.��1�,'.�F��`lr�!,��;��F1�;.:.; +"4 'rR^�,� �LL'�h:1C•' J 4+C1;J�•'i�1'f.:Cl�e 1f7�:.yiara2�i=.•�ir.�5'"i i7:y .•�y`��i y ��- "��''ip'T T��.'+� - �'7�y �i;- F .JxJ f� ��[� f [ 1'��z:.� r �. - �t -�v�� 7.+ �/ .9t ��'�i{ 4?�'1 'Cd } T i. �i: �'?�i""S i s - `k.' i�•yy�i'' � F .�:7�.:i�:�%: .`��..'E�4�'�:; . r, ;.;'��'`��^J`F " �� .'1�3,; ��`� �.jr�` t^�: a el�a° F '�}±'itir•i';'Y:3• . �'• t � ;�. ..Y' .�?, s3s�.'�r',�-. � � • 3 �'r:'•� r� . :�;�ir�' ��a-�_r• •�.n . .,: F."��' ��: �,�n , r y-*}r i' `-'�;i'�i? ''''�C,..+a�':.'��;�,.��ti ��'� ,� �", ST •�y �7�'�y;� ��" �. S i� �.�� . ii ��',v >rk,'-°�,r' C . •s . {�� - � �� G_w+,.�C i-:��t��CF;.y;;. .� ;...�}.:; �;� ! ��•. Fy,. `C i• �� . t�"; s�d�c�>k��+1'r�r a?.?�"� Z`t S�!'��u'� 'i •�y�s 'w.�1St� �' � ,��s 2:4.'��:y�-S^'.�,'��`•'� .�f-i+ � • . r� ��'�•�3�`'= ��,.':. �{�,.r_� ,� i • 4}�� a . a _ r-_i��•':• ri. 3. + °•"r'Jp��i•'.h}}.' ✓,i f�'��, .�y�' .•i,,: �..� .w"' _'`�?�s�y�i;;y�7`� ��` _� '� 1 1�. �� '.j�.. ; Jy' .�•. . . : }`�'t'�#..F�� *i�i'a�; .Ji ry ' „ - .,_�'• 1 .{�kY;� + ' p �yT} �1�.�! •�SS'�"',�.t��A • �7 CY- ,i � yaht l'�.1��S : 1�1��p��4��i� �� ,��i ,_ ;_ .:''. . ' ' : , '." �*[�,•F:��}• T{ ! Ris'�" '.•�a � ��i. '• .. � • � • . :• �i .�-��ti�'1�i."�i�,. ��F}ia•,::�� '.1'�i� ,�,j;, ♦9 �, ..�. .,�.;,�=!:'Y"i.i� Nr��iii6' �y � � � ,i{_�_ .:�: _ - :.-��.MF;�:%;r :#� �� ' • - _ }L. '._i %- rSa�:��5�. ++ � :`i?'.�• '�• Y� ,• �r 'r^ _' '.. '''�4i?�•t'.!i" �."k rf:+�• " . . - �i•,� �a:�.,��!.��, ..��t�, 'a i:��4�' r- .�s¢ ��: ;�7:t'rP,�:�j �•�. - � :'•�' • „+�,��r��.•��a.n_F!>'c� �' ��'u, ; .�•,f�`. - _ �?' �,�^, ��.'"' _Hi� c,i _��"��t. _ s s i ..}�= ��i.�. _ '•�•�...�•,...' .. �.�.`�,�. `� ''��i Y . .id,y'. �y .+.s.;,�. �`.:' "; "r. 'i ��:._ r'3ti. -`��- ,y. �� rt� � ' - • • ' • �?_"''�'LL =rs� #i'�'� q'}`'Y�_' "�- f ,�. :i��r �°'� . r:.:� f�r"}';•�;::r. • , •�', �:a ,.�+eh'�'"�!�.. . �:.-�'��.a-ti�,dR. . -..-7'�i;:::� '�se - • ^� ._ J , s;.}:;•tii��.=.�i -,c� r,� ��. „� �a..-�ti'�,�` •• {,',Er� "� i -+�,,. s�� 'rJ��2eh:� y _' • " .. � "A- � ' :�=��'•� ti`�T' i � rs.�• � �,,`�.'�. }'y-",�_ r��„'.:!r' • ai • ' ' �;^',r♦ i�t� Yy�T;'�y�ti' ��,�,��°.�''0y-.r�{�i4;,.�.r, �.��,,-', �-%�'=S'� „'s:iy�;y �� ,_ �,.�^"`.'%';� ,r.• w^ �'.•,�F^`�'+��3� .{+"� '.Y'•� •�'�;,. i ,�,'�,:1"'�k�',.'�� '��'_� � i T �tr• Y'• - . s •, ,, � �'r:•.�.•�t:=�;�,..�.r�= '"�,��'�Si��_3 �'•�;'Sr • :tir'•:t�::':• ;�� r-.:.• �.a �'r� yy�h.: ��+__ ;'�f� ��:�. , .(=ryi.=','`►.' ,"�'.1�i;�:.f�qi,�� "��_ p.y. - r.,:• �.�r.aZ'�' � -:.�c,.� • ':''• :.`�;='�,�°s '_�}?. .•��l:��'�i;a::•: ' .. _,;-iM1t _;i•. q.;• :a ••�{ ;^r,'. •,;�' ••;Q�- r;.. .s�,P4-t;- ti, �''� •�'�• ` �.s•`- ' �. ' • , ,� '�;,•,. ; �7'r,'f� C �i_c "..:_�i,- ..• i;�'.';:�;.:' '( •�;•�y� 'w:�. � i7, - 'y 4....}��I�. ~� T;� .I_� ,4,�'^L„ � . - .�S`•'!� ��' ' �� `�_ _ _.R. �L.`' ,.1 �� _ ! Lett 83 cont. �I��`��°�ING �� °��y�� .�� -��.�� - --:.:> E-.�:un'Skn3:�, j °.��,: _ :�-.. ..5 axxlr�i3.Iio?7-rn.;.:.-1:rvr•_ .!.- �-,� „R :' •-:. '-:: �'4,. � b .�.- i'�:•.�r•_: ;.��'�. �^. . - : . i.,uuxe�crtii_��H�rrse:: - - [a'ot'� S�rileriar- :��:.�. _�s:.., .. - -- - • -��- . :�::�',..s�'f..•°a:�Fyl i�:"rnx:-Pic_.JeCreSif:+r. �t�` ��•r,� ' - � .�:;.• . . �s . .... . �" :;�i=i.'�" ��- t ��r,` � • •y r. �3=x`: ..� =`v��:i�,:a:�.��r.�i.�• � nf.'u-i's irhLy;.�a��:.i e�� aE�:a i.ti.��::`",:_. 4c.. _ i.�'�'. 'i ��..�'^nl[5�:{YS�^:Ii�P:lhp.• i .'b�3_? rsrc;vr�tlr•,�'u- "'�t=�� `�..;^::C��`:: . . �. _ .� d: .t..��> ;�: r';.'.,.:..- :y�� c?'�� - zs.�'rrreaxie�h+:2rr::� - �p �.�lOr,liill'i:ir #', `-. •7 ='`�',- e.- '` �� ;�. .... ka:kssr;x�-r°ca:L;�l ' x,�'�vs°-_r.��.:J! �,:s..: _.:�- _. 'e'� - . - •'�"F:�-5�;.] - -��:-z:, .:r r.' :�,iz.n :�'r�;�ry�e� �;�. . �-�:��.�;:ea•':•7ie: .tiiih�.']�e hr.G�x ss3�Eii.iue ^:��..Sa-y�': • i..`e•��¢�.�s�e F�. �.��z.r:•� �lw�• �'•� ,�-� a' " - � � p...,r,•; Mieie��<sca:Jidinl:':i� � Tn l i �!uu:isk:rC:�3i�*'cF3iii -1�`'z`�� , ��.^'-:"'Y�`•`"'.,'� ,�� `f::; �� ':�'.:>.-. �.. 'y� 5��:;;i��,•' ' ' L ..�:,i1Y''.� �i r � .:='E--.:::"'�r`.^i��Y A']ESlI�=:1l2'J.k`�i1.R°.� '• .�.0 rr1=.''S^�[•:C.A[_f:Tn.x. .'�±,�: . - �,�'. �'.l' _' ' �i'}�Z �b:^*"?a7 t ?��.;a I rv� - . �" . � .. :.^i�::..� �`,�-, F -.'?x.arc•r.�tLrct,g�rtraj n�`''`: --::L: -_-- ��,�.c��otr,�e�;r�.,°.fi1ic;� �y�.:�;,� �.�:. �!,Yy�i•.�;,...h _ : _ _��''...a�' �:yys�...�'�s.n ,3• .k�•,.:'.� �F' .'�.x.��7 . r�d�y,u:li:�ad:'�-;5'.st' �:s.ii;.,°.--;�- _ti.� � .. -..i�:n�i3u.':-^�':v?: :K . ' :�.� �. .��•.'..�.�'�-_ � l-.0 _�....J I � � � [„37.i`.;�f'� d.�'�-;�7- '°"�`'• r'•�:f;:::� :�-ic�+�s�&�1i.'�e:� . . , J;::•xe.ri�L�nr{3��,. � •_.,-.�:.,�, •.''.�e�, y;.. _ ` 7K �:�. � •f- .,�:•fa;rKS�n::i::c;-��iS,�: � • ' '��7�rr.17irriric.�:�r;':�dvr:t^. k��y�¢ .. :.�s�,.Ft2.,....=�if r-. ` �i: 7��"r�`r. '. "� ..�':.�s'� L' -�b`F:1 5:]:Ji-�f],�.::fi'L'iY`%.1'ai1- \}.34J�P35'C�.r.+n.[ti£.[i. I 7?:E�.eYI'.l.'�:ti:.ti6U�:- 'y:ij;.:��L it..'�: ra�:`�,�,:.i-�'�'.:.'*:Y' 1 L}FLSiIl�]i�4FY1h �:'• YFy' 'q �.' �' � � �:n _ , . °'.�fe:..Y'.1�:P�" � "3l '1 til:ef�"'I'�v. . _ •�. i��a�tR�n�w �" Y.�-�' ��fct�� a�..� :g.z.�:� �-. ...-:�i,.°ic_?ti:�� AKi. ��A'7-'�4 f 5 ' .'�'f;'.:.' .:�_.�s I'.�-1?{Ty'c[liU-"��.+r.:l. �.r . 5_.�1'i5t-�x.:�s:.-F1ar.-i� _ �� .,r�. - :.��.... Jr �:�7.'s:�•. adtc�iY3:zwT.cnsry,�y . ;ir`'�� :�•'. � :,�W`i�;_;-,�.._ .-Y Y:� �_1c3�srcr_h?�i�^=:aL•i�h'. '� � r?cti.a_c:117:rytiitl.�'Fi�:i :$:... '�4:.; ��:'''".�.. . .. ...�:'�-_ s� :s J�r�.v�::! -::�i;iL•c}a-�d:.�ci':.�sr� ;°��:' _ 7:K, ��.�.; ��;:;•� s:u;a� :d. . s;E.,.^:'�ya``'°�.�;�,. . ?'C*'':- - •, r.:?;:.i;;' � `:�'�F�� :;r- �'°:';��'� :r.c.� ^^�^u.'rr,�.:l.�.. :�;�i•�i�;�:�u:wbeska r�iw•::7iu:=Wh: �..� :z '- - 2} FRti- .Z "i: r�,.� -3�.•-:::�-��_'Y. c�:Y.u-�u.ir.,ri: _:,� .��xi�i-.n.u�s�Genv o...r_- c°'_c3a, ..s_el - ,r. "7, r A is. - =.t _ - ir:..;;�:.. i* '4 i� a :;.. �.�s,.� -�;: �-i� s=FSs�--- . nF �•Y ..le �1_❑ :�^d l:r c.._.�r:�n:��r�sz. w:f�.'��e�Ff o' :z,: `��"-:'`.<,:_ - I � �'�:xa• �:�V''Y �� -�c��>. ..a��•r�. [��m.,l;'.X.�.47r�S a .. 'y��:.�'. ... �:d:..- ., .� � - ��:c��cin�s �tir_ki�xi_ze�.ai�.r.f'� '•:�c-,r�i�r+'�r:>vir'.n� ��::'..... .. .. . .-- •- -'�x:a�.��:�r. ' .. ..� . ��=�.•'��. .•.?i�::.:�r�'h�:��:: :tc+C�xfxrz»e._L�iZ-u apcc9li�_`a_'!5r.�.li. 'I'hr..�lc-r:?�:�:g�E?:f�:, �,�n--�.E.,.�i+:�a��-�ru...�..ir ;.r:z:[iz+::C�u.':�rk�c•_:.r. "siiisr�il�x:.:i.3� :i�F�-r.iry;n�FR.,IY.f�.�.LSr �aL1•�.'a.s'.1c1.1�H.'�1'2CS111i1�.�LYi1�lN�L:I.T�Yw'ii•P.�?fITIL"l.'.1:•i"1�t'"".:`:�� ',��r.frr�:rixh L7r�=c3mire�g�:�`:;::�0-,3 �^r�crkf�m::�:.ar,' :�anaoC:svXr::�:aax.� l2�11L�zr�r..FpCS1rT.TiAA,'►-i�']lILOI'jEd�.�'.l��ii�YlCYY�Y•_�.�:SY']Y:flC'.Y�17f175. � q�3��j a�j �:�•1�.-�k:�.;:��as�� fi:��u.hl:tu��x,,tN}i� '1_�.:"•_'�-�i-r�nan�sYesr}•fe� 23 ' �J�..lB:Y4�3i !.'�e.:Aeye'.s.:.ti,r�zi� rs�:�••iaz�P_ri��.Kr�j��-f_ :�-a.�Yrwi��ziSOrte y� �'!�r-:fin�!'±ss��:u►:�:.t `:��m�ai��r:�:i.;ou� � i�•�x_r*-W�ldr�^i:r}:i�ni1� C011t. ! �� .61.�i�� r&:i7'1•t1�.3�°�-Q�IC�f'C7:3 � 2T:l:G"�'E��L�C'�i;3:At`:."4C::1/ ��ru:•"�.2'{�C�Ex'i'�'Y:�7i}:"*.:.'-'Sri.�..'- . x:��tiis:��v�n^,?x�:r;x�A° ' gr:�i�s;�,rtY?:;�_w3�'."��e f�i��dib''=�g...:rk.7�nts. i7"��el;°;rw.::;�:��t ! ;r:'�wr.�xl�r.�:ir��v+irn:- � s:s}�,•`:�:r��y nc�:.x-nfor � "tr�e�il�::m:-zp�:a�:�, � ?:f:ar.�tp±a��:.,��.:�3,� ix�.s° Gi+zn��L,r:u�as:c��. �r�n.-iax.:i;a�i1?g P.r � a�u=al,.:�wt,�:�:�,��. r_m��=,�,}:�:�,�:},-:� � c?,:=:.A��.�a�i��► �NI-'�F'��„��-u,,��e 1 :^cs!�t��1-��rc,,7.Lm �tzln-;i�ii;�:-�r,,:� ��arn�`��li��-:�{l��a�o� t��.--��i:=:atiti;a,,yi ' 1x�r;:�.Kx;lss�r.;�r^b-�s, f��c!�:o£n�:'�s�::��:1 I l�r;.'�rr�Pr:�r��yes� I� ',��i,x�':�th3t.c:�r.nF�, i :,�r..'-ISt-�n��r.v��r::s'-_- �C7;�,,s�r�re:�h^'�ti��rs�d n:�w�+,ei�esigi�-�t�*icl;��' sa�-�.t�#r�,va'!.`.i'_►�' i�rti r�xU:�,+i'..�:i t):±" c•tias.�r�'7��i.^s�'?�z��.r�,ic�t;t � �c1'�n��uir.an',��-rt; tr��nsi5.•;'.i2o_'�ci�?nnF1 I F.tit��'s`,�.�Z�ac�-�R�iia,�' 4x,��3tkct::;�=�'i:eP��,:a:� ::r.t��rt.L�l�e�;••r.�?-��:�ir � i=�:.�L:=ly�tp.�rJacn. �Yr.r:�•;�r_��3`�:C i:r�- I'r.�-ri�s�!3�..rall tFir.i:.,x�- Wati.�Ft+�'��,=xi�i��lr� 4t4�iit�::-�:iT�7ar.-yi �i�T�,-:.�:3ct�-a^.:r�. �t��a�ir;`�.t3;.{�Ir�::� �n.+}1ti:qa�ptt�;�=�a I �ti�nyapli!ti-�l�i`:i f� irrt�,�.�-r�Y��r.7;r.:�ir Y,:��a;xriri�tcl:t:,-i�-a=`rr. �uui��:a��r. - "-3.^_!u��.:9�7ie'�7�={;s.F:T'.- -?�eu:5:�:atiZt�:i!Tvs:::]k1 is`a: r � � '•• n - � 4l�!1�7�t'�3:.�1-e S� i�:.-�:aS':3�'}°T,:s'�t_•^'°- I ..n r��:.:?�.;��r_::�t�� •EF:::e:*rfr-a-u-p::,��.��x-- F:_s��an�,�ro��:ie'x: ' ��r�:{v��tr'�4,4;��•:;�t`,Y �°�r��n3:�r�+.��tir�c7c;a 4in��t�Prx�u i�a� ': 5lr�e:t��c��;�sk��c!nxf.r: , _,sr�;,ur z•�',aa�tFrr•.i� ' ��.+il.-►trU�c•�lrx�c i�K�e::,�i4,;�lf'15C�}'Gi4a :t.F_G�[t::'il1:,1'R:�.�ytutLa sqxc{EL+:�trsi�a�`1��o-<.rP ..3�:�'�'sJ�,��1:'^�ili�u;:tii: � �T:tii7�y;�1:.D`'�;a�.�ab'�v�1:F� ri=.L�.tel,?',-�,atSr+-3�'r)i,l :K��Y:e�r"�?�:�l1r�aC��1�. r�ee�:_tr�4�Cn•r:�.��a��t;. - i�:-�x��ai�:il�ix�ea�.�;-i �-:�r�b�e�..�r�.r��, �+r<�.:�'�r�r�,}��pim,�.;x �`�:,e,e�r^s�a�-is::��- rn:.�,�Lu�:��";ha �l�k��ti��:�:�,r�i�cn�a �ria3l��:-M,�;��.7�. _:�:�:�;r�.c�a w��?t?r�� '`rri'��,:,K��a,.x�:}.vrs t�'i� � �'-,��t' '��. 'a pC{•::_';�i'a1; �^,�rrl�_x�_ °�^r.��-.�t�j.-��`�err;�. t.si��.��t�_�:�a�r::�� :�:ti an�l c;r°e�rz�;t!irc'�tp :ws�:�ti��.�'_i�c�. 4f��,-r_�i�uziss��=��::a �i��_'J.'��,`��a��;L.t�r+ rsC�,K:u�;].l�ar:ot��c�r d'_;�,'[',�Xws�rs."3�.=+�e . �Lt:s:��-�t�_:n*_�:��:.,c_ �-.::ir:,��',:�:m�r'[usc �t�r.�'�r�t��r�,�i�as3�:� s&±r.[r�zf.: � Y[3:3'C:'�i`,S��L•_`Jiil':J':vS' Li�IC; .%{.s=ilSl�:7Sl j �'A�'3��i:7c.fIY:Y..�.j —• _ •._ ��:�:'.'z''_'y'-.�•r.v�,.:i :iaL'�.z,2'P.t;#t�i['t:�I��.��s' -1�]-��z^7a,�r.�r,:.-arr �:�r1r7�ron i4�i.r'rs�r=� �aY�h��-.r�V�QTircl'fi(] . �i;�'�:r_'i.;'-.�.e'�.?�tiCi.?C:}:ff�� I 7�i`:i:r:ilfc�. . .3�'.Jls!��r�.F:��I�P.�Ir.'�a:CY:t6E. - I�Z�CI�Ii?`3:TC"'�-3'a�143�'Ji!��iT:S�']�y?,i Lett 83 cont. I]��JEL�P1�fEIliT AG�t�:�:R1ENT j4UMl�IJN1'TY��IVEFITS "�Jn�ler Stare f.�w {��zli=urr.`.�Gover�inient Cnd�5etti�i7 6,"5t34�-65�69,5],iiev�el��fri�ril a�reeinents e��a�1e�he�it��to grs�lt a loll�sr-Cet�m apprC�val in exc:�tan��r"r�r��r�r��-��le�ilbliC benCflL'S." "�t:7ff recU�imen��that thc Citsr{:au�c�.pra�Fide direci�p:�f�or negati�tiii�the I7euclopment A�z•�e�tt��il.,.�ias�c�u,i it�e Ccrlluv��in�paralri�t�r�: 1. Pr�:vide a �nurr_e��f nn-ffn�n�r��rPn��P.__. �. FE•�vide oiie-time itenis in tl�e r"orm aFpublic imor��.�m�nt�nr titudies��at�ti�ould ben�fit th�:surr�unc�in�arc�. :i. Prc��ic3e G�nechanisrr.f�r f��r,di�pragram�and scrtFlc�s i;hat m��t ��-gc�ir_�c�mmaiSit3r i:ceds. 4_ �'urs�.ie a rcmnzitri-er�k tp f��p� Ixr�uSitlg u��r�rlufiil�cs iti �t':�Cily ai:c�surrc�u:�din�re�-i�t�, 5. I't�rsue a tr p c�p pen�lt+�Gmo��lt th�t is Sc�.�crc enn�a�h tn P[itiin��r.nrn��ial'CP'�Y[tli thG �rajcct descri�ti�n." 24 "Th�E'�-�em�v��oAk..�are�enerallyabove aud hcy�nd mi4igation mca4ures�ssnciAk,�d wi�h tb�E1R." `�'k��x'amesvUi'lc+iu'..ititi�l a�ui�c c��lltcts :h�staff re�ommen c�tian �ase� on all aFthe�ra�ic}us i�,p�:�4 re�eiyed tc�dat�� 'he CQUnci!has thc option aF yupE��yr�iR�nc�fr�mc�nrarl�,madif�nb the fr�rnetAroi•l�r or pr�}ac}sin��n �iltcrnativ�framP��rk_ 1{��rrJir��4��'�I�iCll�ptit►n�hc�at�nci! [:han��s, it shn��id]ar[itride dil'ectitrr�tra thc i°c�atiatin�te�ni in nrder�r�i•�ie�q4i,�llutl5 Lu I��!�irl." "�rlt thc canclusivi�af ncgc�liatian,�hc nc�c��i�tix�g te�m t��ill pres�nt a tePIY!3F7�t'L fi}J'C:f)T157C�P.:-�r��.�� hy�rh�C:nunc�il. �Fr.er rst�uaic`l ac�ep<<tn��e of th�term sYteet,s�-h�vi__�re�s;r��3°C�7rri�let� L?evcinpmen.rA�reement A�reer�ie�1L h�z'�.iblicrUvicw�y .lit�'lannin�[:c�mmi55iUn��ik� ChC�1L�� Council��respecti�.�c pubIlc l�e:�rin�s.... �r�urc�: [�ity ot 4�e�r�ln Ya�k[:aun�-il Me�til�g Fellr�..�ry I�3,141? Staff Repart�"12-U24 A�c r�cia T#err�#�t�Y 7 �-3 n'4 �,� s��r-a�-�,•�� 4, •r•n 9�rnti�r �lrr�n3 Lett 83 cont. ''ilnd�r StaL•e lacv[�aliCarnia Gflv�rn:nent Lode��ti�n 658�-b5�6�.5),de��el4pment agrees e[1:��l�rh2 C�t�.'ta g�'�nt a lnn�er-=erm apprnval in excttian�e for demonstr�ble pul�lic Uenet'its." '`!t D�ve]o�mcntAgreertycntis nat samcttiin�that thc C'ty can require an applicant�o apply F+�r, i�t�t is s�rnFr�7in�r��r tnP�� icant rnay r.liot��e tn a��ly Fa�'iF r.h�3��re Sgr king�rPSrnd ri��tits zn a��rU�'�is and�Ur� �r��je�'t elem�nt tha:is ns�it-stan�arit c�r cliv�rgLS f-c3iri'LUe�ic�g U~c�ir.anre qr i��ncra] P]aii rcquircm�nCs° "...public l�e�ter"its that a-e�eEi�1e�tlirnugli tre Devel�pi��ent A�reeniel:t d�:�ot�z�ve to l�e dit�ectl,y [;o�r�la�ed;p a pi=oj occ's 1n7pacts or follo�v a s[�ndard formula. kor t:��purpases of this discussion,public h�nefit is typical�•vie�s•e�l as a distinct tapic than thase in➢�erent a�tr-il�tifes af Elxe pi�nje�t that may��co�si�fered�ositiv�,sucl�as ti�c�:�j�sted saEes t�x ra vr�i€u��'� Sa�arr?: CiFy nFl�i�nln Parlc P1�2tning(:nmmissinn Septc;mber�:�,�D12 S�aff ltepar: �,genr�a irer,#F2 24 cont. "UncGr thc tcrms of'�t<ix shttring�z�re�mer:.-f�etr,ueerl the 4:ity of{:u�ertinc��trltl�lpple,rl��le receives ap�si�Uxii�ia�.�lu��da�ol't:�r Cii�'s annual si�a�•e[�f sales tax rec�anue�dire�;ll$7�ene:°aked by the�ampatT�. The Cily sales t:��t'igares 4�resente�I :n thi5 re�n"k;�r�nc:tr�ft�e E��ym�nt:;taApple. Althc��h the aba^eemer�t�s schedul�cl schecl�3ec1 ta es:pire it;ZO1�th�azial�vsis assum�s it is extezided'n�o�1��far�se�sble fii�ure,in colisideration c�f� de[�Plppmenk agreemeT_t het�+;eei1 r1�}�le anc{:u��r=i3�n_" 5r��rcc: ��qnomiraiad h'isc�l li:�pac[s G�ncratLd blrApp:eit�C�pert[no by IC�psFr h1�r�tnn A��nri�-�s Prc;pared 1'€�r�pp1e Nlay 2�13 FnnYnnYP 1� 1��c 15 GOMi1+9�[�lI': l�(I�IGATIbN MEASLIF7ES SHOUL[] N(]7 HE,C�N51Q�R�P D1F2ECT COMMUNi7Y��N��I'C� � Lett 83 cont. �ammunit,�g�n�fits A� can�iti�n aFappra�ra] tn pr�j�ct ''vV�tile Sta�lfard esti�ates its hen�fits gac.lti:�e ta tdtal��out 5173 million,th��i��+v:�l�� th<< pri;pascd hin�:fits dt ahc�ut.��3C1 r_tii]]i�rn. T�e rnain riiffererce is Sta�fnr•r�'�a��rri oz1 th a�lIye L•'o Pas�es cUn�titvtes pu�lic l�e:z�fits,while thc�ity:-�aintains tha�thc��a�-e rnita�atig�2s i�eqp��e�l �a��ta#e�aw,�� So::r�e; ��anforcl Hospi l.�l �xp�trtsi�n 5tiils'1'otivard k-'3nis1� Line B�f Gennady Sheyne- F�ilt�lllt«�IVcckly Nl.�y �ll,�U�1 24 cont. ''��vhile S�ant�ai•d values �he"�arnnl�r,ity b�n�fi.�' ��cica�;�at ahauL�7 7� mi��inn,th��;'ty��5 ��'s closer to 59 3��i I I�r�n. Fala r�lko oFt�ci�ls�.r�u� that mart}'�f tltt verte�its in t�e StanFoi�d prn};ns�1, ir«luclin�I��L:alt��in pass�s,a r�rriiti�at��s t�t l.lospiG3�s a�'e �'�qu1�'ed t�pravid�Co�eC en�ironmental cleRranc��'�r tt�c prs,;c�t. Sc.�urs:t: St:�nford Hr�spltal�;xpaasi�n U}7 for�inai 4'nte B1J�e::�iady Sheyn�r Fa�t��ltc� Ti�nc�s I ur�e '?,'L U 11 Com�nent�: T+Vh�tt�rrC�J1c mit�;atiQ�u�x•rquir�d by st.akE iawfvr.Plppa� t�pro�-ide to�et �nt�ir�nmen*�1 cl�aranc�for the pro�ect. Lett 83 cont. ks'.�ti.��3�.�S�r.i^�.t"��, .a. .s r.•.`.a . ; � �'. ��-r��}, ,�.�4-.� �.�" `mLi;.;�z:.,��- �°v �•;��Ix,� �°�` �y ��..�a.��'�,r'�-`�,��,��5. ,:�J�.��.-�.:��Ir...D �.o�G�> � �,,,� � � ,� a ��r �,�;ti��'�.��'.�, ��' ��..��'��,��'�':..��.`.��,��r �.xtx�'C��e_��'�:a.�� L=��:�[��€f�I�ft4��:..�'RAi EC��1�:'�li��J��J'f�i(3i��,,�;;:� ��7�;t�t�c��u� ��?1�[VEg��F'I�'�14'!ki'I�i��i��N!�[��1�I�1��E� ti r=.a,citcr�;d�:�� :�v �v��'Uv"�i t`��.''�"��'F� _ C r�;?:�:r;.- '�•Ic;.�'-:.{u-t. �ti•iin�:�inF9:i;��n•r Gzysha eL�'��ll�ii-'.!�f71'+tffES =1'�j:+;Nv� 'i�:-:L+I1Elf:= :ax'a��!�'�rri:a�}:3::1od;1kG.:.lO.ii,_ L`a^��Sa�k ��i^:r�] c�I"�:c ��la F�a.,��r��°ra.°�y� `��v•�:"�',as'.`41T3G.':3'�'I5- r.sr• ;�� b� x}:��cU�inn ;� �au'id�:�o� tri�, r.�u_iv:l�= _rc �S�Aru:�: ��1Cls Cs4;��=;:I��I�_I;.�C:`�",. �Il,�str�C:=.i�r �+�e'�a�t P�� lt� *;:'�:� a f'fr1113L1� i-'�r;n�;l;.^,a-fl::iRe�;o�ti:;r �^�:d;�r"�%��:],[l{]ii:�;r�-t�s Ccll��s S�rl i� ^�.•,.�- �eca:�iiqy� in co:c��tir; �P �,r1r��.nify L�,��-�,ic:s i° i'?nirs.la f.ain6h:��:rvi:�: P.`k��` laf:�a�h�ka . '!'11e'i:lti:lt�':.1.ArR�iS��i� �'ariir s41a'l:�ll�ri,�F!'� p�z•sa:��zcalt:2eae:z�.:zn�- �"'��-ni117,:�r�rm?�r i�sU�;iksi�g"i}��:I•�.- �19 {:S}k3'.�lE`.I:V k�;?�lii:3 v"..� 's�:a:i:;iis�n�.wG�.is: Rona ssanC7�CI'f@ F..0 i::A�r:_c'u��'c��,[:lu��"li�trs_ "�a i=i.�ri 1;�y••iv' �_,,,. Ye�=f�'• il] ?kC�'..-mgr. t'n� �-�n�- _ ^,ip Ca�l:�;, �:w�arch '•I_3••cer'i°�g��r•i �!ek�sC��t?t'fr°r��.rf�r CRir?3;�r L� �.:'`:1�� jcrul�_.^. - • ,s� � L•:e z�a:��e:^ ��x ::r.•�.�:,Uv� -��tfG;o��G�r7'arn=s��T:::r.r- _ �h��ce��e:: �;1 :-:F�:7-i.i:1 C4:C:ril'n'd'`i i;�`7:.+ � 'r:c'IiSrl.fl�iC.'t in�!r�p4�ti-:x� nf �M�:C'GL'; C��ffale r�p��ids F:•us�da- 1c�::I�•�et�rsu Lix•^:�3&9E'lE.a Ai2G� 1'•':.'C.C�' fl:+� F,�tF��. � 5� � �c��i,a� k��z_?+-dul:��y 24 [:�-.e�.l_i:2 i-:rc'i "`=Pe �1=};t��.s�•1_ r�?i?��1�_1 F'r_�;I;�sF��n::-fi�'� � r- f ,-�rigir�al'; p;•nr:�sr�d t.r. ��I�t'�>ln^s �iffl�;�::s c. C011t. �:a��e t��;(:��il.�.i��; f ur.d�- F:,ur�d:�:ic�i�r�C��;IY�, ai'iin;:�n:u��a�, �t{Y::� ali{i.5!. ��:Lu��'.� t�9 Ci�LICBfi:�` rCJ.r.-G�I�I�.i�t.�"'rAq. Ct�n:]B.TE�;'r k�'lG nt� LnYF� I��c at:3::4 � r /="G 3:5{JdErf!`� t.�r�i1.:�:7 ., i-u�ni.� nng��anmr_•�, �a:�l �r:r+<�.� ',�,.�^:i; v ,, N1�:�rar��v f�,�.1; it .�sici:�r :u �..•�_� ries u.r.t;G.iu al3?:�E�F,$�fJO,U��(J:�r:it�- C-.r.>t4��4��n�i `;:':rr'vl�: o-�:��lt:111�.Y11�V�.�;:.1�4A-:Jli vF '-fPI-k.^��il='� r7�'7 18H:�AT.I'cl�lff-d1.:;7- :�i ii�F�ti�.��l� �_jr-.I i ��,�t:Yr:re�;ltn•��dL�t;-Ye €::.�Tra r. I'�fl�}r�T1'P:� �r�:'A�q� F,-.l'�. ,='�Fn ��•�,;ihC;;:Y13'"�.I'll�.j;,�f;'f.� .�taau_��.1.i-_r��L?=�__lr,{� 'vt:�ti 4[;Eii:=r.i.,:�a1 n:a SCUY{.?:-eC6:C�:} CU"IAl'CO�iiIL'v•,�1,"�:]ll�l�:f1�:�•iPG -_...-- - --- -• .-• .• - k�z� :�c �.ir:�ir,�, "�5`= d:' r ti1C'.��•1:•.GYGS�'r�li[1ur��?� �a•I:1�v:i]T�:7�EI7�:i°n�:-_:_ . I��:UI l}�6"C•dlL�!.si VI��V�.aL' ��:11 'J��.:�`�] �7rOy1�t:1:S .� ,°,R.;'E�t'-llC� _3'.lilw2z' l:�k�".�. �,'•`l".['�fr s�o �r�l��•.�ti n:•.ra.--e. f�rs�;� �il��l':N1�:�0.'1 �J ]a.�,�l �'.1=�t?=1:f`a Stlli�UF.'.Cc^� }�� t_r:lwan=.t_ai'tae k;:.ii�'' �u:;inr.-� :,i� r- :;cl,�.nl ��,r.:5:.onr�:inh��SrJt)rr.:]lion ?V;en:o i'��:s C;nu;c:.'• e::�c:�s�'at��:o_��la�s :��y. in s:D�1C Ls7 tS�-ai::��r.',"gf. _��cs=��•�_• �_�xEif K:i�ii, f�r��':*aY.�n�•� ,Tn�r� n�t• l::;f f��n�r..ny:�ti.. [-'rn.�r.�lfi., ,�r%�n if, rrrt S,'�:� rr�r�ali^rk Cr�r] :,h�7ui,.tin=�,h•a:�ta l3sf t:r;°=G::��:�uuyb�riE�li:�r.r.�i i.:n^�. l'.Ur7�s u:'yty ='a�{�I ^:�Q�t,�`UfiL�,3 5�i'•.. 2Q�t.^u[Y�7't'.f:.lk!qnF� �74�'A'�{a:Tl�i p�r4:ctj�at�d �rx �F],1tS�' 'ti�_nf,:r:=:lj�l'u i]A� t1 tS•31tti1 !?!�l� r:l�"�TLU �'�.".[ l�}'•:? �,?'b71�� ,;��'%:tId;;l �:�5- 3'�'iL!'L"1_�_' 1�•�:1J r'Ull:1��I,.Ul; i�a_ •:�..�M�e �.0 ::r�•ti•e�`![crr.- Ctli?��iyl:�. ;i ti.Y•.;!, l�'lr�'. {�?YRr. l:I�iis3�-i��.4 :Y:�:O Ec711"� ,.�:� h�al:, ''! 101}F 7F�.F.Ii'�. 5:i: k��=:: ':_tn [:i,U��ii '',�le:�� s h;�Ut; �rc��t ��ll r�a:.c - clor�t».� n:f��:r c:�r��:�s:�s:- � i}k-[' .::LlZY"d f5't-�t':•:'t1�7 3.�a A ��OI'�.C� f.�l.�jl`Vr�t'GYl':ril :�i.� T,:•:lA'�F;:i]lY•iF_I:ALL��S:ri:��C, j F�c�rF�l F'uc-�k:nn1;e-n1;:;��.. th� •�l_re�g�a_�_.�i:: uc:i,- '`'1:.'s.�r.�e�.�,W r..iA•��ir�r.�,� e�:u�!3r:i�,1: .�e.s�'frii�,w:�l'i�" �1'qC�•.a�ir`,tl-� ri,rrri=�1�=.�1� �f`':F-..,,,�t,vni.Frl��t�3:�:- '�a b� aa•.�3 tc gi:re. o-u+,ti�.a :.ar-:.,x�:�,'L�►r;�,:€•r�:i�r�+:_;;n 'n!; •xi�: �e �:i;t��.7�u�;�:: u. i Ync:�::�. :ic��s �.� ,a�a, ,h:: nlanz�r :�uac, �cc��x�:�. :•7�r�r��... ; <:� :,7.�{�g�`�'r.2E1�1 I]?E�i+ LD CP�f.0 h:l [t�L�['•�{:�IUCI� :C:�. Tra�:�[�']'3I•L'-.l :�f�l�;11'U��A�3 t�T'�-Y::�""::in71i� "i�:1D �7�:�I '�:t°•.:l:kC:1C•;� _9?:i,Cl� rilr 8uC cezlttl'w �� :�8.-r: .T17�:{t� ?t�`�ti.11� �a�r.y� ��le'� n:a��, � � ,=r.i�`ure�fs��;,�dwEinr�,c�:^:; 1i,rc:s�,�kc:_.��,�.i�, "'i'k,ist,�l,�esr.f:F.r-ax�per °Qr xd�it-1or€; i;��t•�t�zie�; ��-,z�I'�.A6-S."k�41�CiAf'a.:�;� :lZ:.'.:Y''': S��".;:13.1:�L�-- CFIt] f,}]hL1L L}Yr•i cYCC.:/v'O�4 L:7�:". t'r:-�i j?.;iir!�i�n��,£�i7!7,>>��ll d�..�,s��.�t.k��;;=s�:d. �::vII_]I��u:_�'ti 1�'ut�d ��_tf C_l�? k�elp Su�:U::L �tiE;i'f'fi�:�1:� I��i.:u��r_t,h,�'r.c�:hnQJc'F ��n:it r^oc;r7. 7§t3l;�4:1'�(::' ,��.31!►[;a`r:�tr,�^•x:� Lett 83 cont. Ccyrnmunity B�ne�it� ��'�'assacia�:d witli�.n��pending prc�jc��:�i•as a c�nditivn Q�ap�x�oval#n any proa�ct �` I��'�'.��,'lla'rt 2{�f)f3�n4gle��7r�vide frpe c��irLles�ir�tcrnet{V4,lf+i) [tCtS�roPiC'tt1 hrflul]t11t1 l�'ie�►�. Go�r�le '''7'}�is riel•.�ti}i�k is a��r�v fflr ies to givr�a�l�to a�id enga�e�r�ith the ccmn,t�itir.}��z�h�r•�nu�• h�atlquarCer is..,.it has bcci�tren�Lndausly r�,v��-din�,#o pa�-tner with the loc�l gov�rnmen#,Ck-�� schoal�:,thv IibrarTf�Lhe nei};k��e��lzu�>tl cl:��l3Cl"d LIi7fIS...LI int°aduce tl�e p�wer at'Fr�e,vviref ess ]nt�rnet�o�tze i�itv," �n additir�n tn�ra��idingno cast�'iRi servicc in lh[:City�,the akFeer�ie�iC� Gv�gl�c�ll$F�rr Cfng�le to�a��the�ity an annual fc��f'ur usc of t:��ity's sL��a=lli�.;:��pules�t�a ee�uip [}1��+lT,jrB TTIpE}lI��l}]I'�l'}'SBx['TCGS�S'lt�l 7T1UI71�L"+uF!'CICSS G€�lt��Jf:'l£I1C� So�.rce: Cit}r of I+�IoiFnt�::n l'i�t�,• "- 1�, ]une 2t�1t Gts�Je�i�r�s$ 1 inillinn ro tfie]o�al cl:,mcntary and middl��c1�n�tils,tl,� Mr,u„t�ir� Vf��vw�b'h;,rr7aii 541iaql�istrict, 24 cont. " Nc�vemher 11, 241i �v��lc:in�,�csts in afforaa�alt housing iiz M�uz�[�in Viet��,the$23,5�nillion Pranlun�trcct Fc:mlily f�p:�r�meitts,a 5:-unit r�n[,zl d�v�lnpment, Snurr�: l�nga[c Inccst in [l��nc �"rojc�� i3�•i�iilce 5��i?'t Stin f ase Ulerr.tir�+ NY�r.S L3e�embe'7, ?6�.1 * U�i JuT�S ��,��1�.G�g�le annnur.�ed that i��vill dflna�e�1 milli�ii to t:��:��ountdi�Vi::w 41�k�j�mati �chool I]ist~icrt. it's the s�cand such�rant that G;��;�;lc has;_;iti��rl i��the C�isCCi��, 1LSlc�d b1hCtk'Ci Gc��a14;:x�,'CLed�tly`t�lzl�,i]>>•�Cux►�f�r it�he��y investment in th��istrict,the Ivlan�i�e:af�;�rc�m-a�tiiG��AFf:�ira Fnr[�agglc,sta:��that th�"tornpan��is _��pin�to hirc t:��nt«i incit�iduais�m its n�rr��acicyard izz 1Tears t❑ ca��ie,ar�d th:�t in�re�tir��z1]ocal e[tu�:ci�n is a Sll7�`Ili'C`�'dlir r��ny��rin�;the�°;i m��.�ny r�in r]n jii�t th:it_.__i,Lr�w:in I. �n cnn�»2i c��p�nrting nur �Aq]]7�tOtv�7 Sr�Iir�iyls.]�C�f'_iltillri'�f�I tiTl.'C�L'fl,'S ITl T'Anl]�l l'A1TY�+1QL'��TC'�C�fIT'lo 8 St"C1T1��Lti1C3t1021,•� Lett 83 cont. S�Lirce: Go�gle�lnz3�te� '6'f Millin�r tn l�nr.al !;r.hnnls �iy iVick V�rc�n in �'c�iCC U�'I1�14�11'iC��1]'G�lCL�' �t1t1e 1ti, 1�.M�.� � D�7 J u�y�4,�[113 [f��eB�c,k]" has pl�d�ed as :nuch as�'1�i3O��:o ot�ci'h�ul� 5tn��eFrant in B�lle Ha�f�yi C�nte�•�t 1Tami�tn_�Avenue ar�L-1 Wzllatv kaad und t�r�tiv�r l5 pe�-�e1tk nf the r��t�utt+,`: Ju�e 7U�G,:�c�c�rdin�; tir:�cUpv�Fan a�rticui�r�t�rtbe:ile�l ��tfle Ct7ul1�i1,`' SotXl'C�: Fa�ehn�Ez Co i I�I�F�und NQU,�P�li�r:�:ah�r.ation F3y E�antiie Eslin��r S�t��o�c i��ercut•�+Ne4�s Jun e 7,�Q7� C�t�r of Menia P�tr1€Cat�r C�uxr�:ill�e�tir�;June�,��]13 Ag�nda Item#F-3 �it,��Nlaiia�cr lt�pai�t#1�-UJ1 24 cont. � .0.slc�^f c5f u}3�r�t�es�i rc�uns� ta�ii f�rr bic�ClisC�rid�edestri�zl5�:'e ixi r�G nc��rly��;�i'nvetl cit,� E�u�l�e�,�17�t�tk� .� i:h��llor•Ls�'��cti�ists�:id a littl� funding fr�m C�a�li. T:7c [�ity's '?01�-1�budgc�,appr�+��cc last rrtonth.incl.ide4�,lon� I]�t U� LI�7�1'd[1�;;;�]'�}U�� ti)l'L'll far tlios�oz��r��t an�i�n bik�, ��aid in�art with ��l•:i�i,�1{}{1 :'r�rn(;t��;gle,.., in�a lct�c�•t�bout�hc afXCr, Go��le real es�a#�c�ief�]avi� [�adc:iff��;:;icl lz� s�+:�s "�lelib}�t��i"u�e r,ity fi��i m�ci��n�-h�t.hi ng5 a tn��ri�rft�.�t�ii�yea�•ar,r��ftcr�i[ht; �it�550(1,O�p taavards thc cause,... Th��aa�le pr�jGCts ir�clud�$:�7��C�C1 fc�r��•]y r��:cdcd d+�+rvE�rawn �ilt�racl�s, 51.��7,000 to help e:ttcncl thc 1'crinanentt �rc el�'1'r�7il t�;�lidcllQfiel�i lt�a�l��nc1 �'i F�{},i7�10 tnvaard�er�ating a nr_�.� E�ic,�c.lc.��7s1�c�,•�ala►�i7 pl;�ii °c�z• tlxe�it5r.,.�• {'.��g,�le�lsn a�r�td t« c�cr��te��5,[lUU to add fl��hing li�hts to three e�oss��valle�on�horcl�nc Bo�.l��at��. ciearc��wnlu�v��,•-- "��'rc 4�rt�utl tc�c�ll��auntain Vict��ha�ne a.nd arc thrilled t�v,�oek v��izh tre city�4 pz•n�note a r�c�z�e c�;�Llr�hle anc! hik�-Fi•i�nd!?�rr�m��u►iil�r,"Rari,:lithe s�id i:� an cm�i[. Lett 83 cont. ...an��ther�'s stR11 $�5:�4Q iii Goggle iiiai;ey�:�at l�as y�t t� �°5]:��lr Dii FiIIZ�AT1{I r7P[i��CI'1�1". lmproUerttents. 24 5a�r�e; l�rl�unkain Vicw Woic•e Cont. �}�D;a�iiel I}�bi►1L ]u��r�� 013 Pagr� � Lett 83 cont. f},7FI�rl;f7 k7aa�� F��a�t�heEp fu�� ol��,-�,atiqs� 'd'li�P.�Fii,r�F�ark.C:i�v G'c�ut�:l th:�3.yz�k a�- � }I�"LYL't"-:Y E]ii1�K'E'r:t'i�SII'-14Si�E' 1(•..�J."If?��'Yf�l{`C'sT:U-'�FI��- ;i!�n it:��c,H�4i�nur� t)ut�]i��;tl��n��L�,��r:: �on1:fCr7��,�,�ai,.�,-.�tp tc� hc;� ,r]t�nr�ir.. ' ��Ta nsji�&i-i�e:"vvf!�11,►� �TYl1Ji�.7�j.7e:.�.�7�F!{��,iC� &8 i'.1u!'}S aF�+�.b5��'�J�:7 �;•��a�Y•L4tiui'��#��:i�mf.�n tl'i�:F�71 i?�I�c��r�c�ike.r $�T I:iC[1_i.�''1 ii^{17�'� �iriCl t��illt�u'R�9[1 azi� �,�o�;c-r^5�v�t��_it�f 24 ta•.rt:n=�arii'�:]un��3U:�, urs�rr�Sr,�tr��.�s?ay�i,''�9'.� C011t. �r'r�Y17Eli=�?',�tiF7 i,�i3 ki'J ��7L'•W C•L�.�1��-. . �'rL']i�r i.�?f7Y�'e21C1�]IL �{;l'�{!C A1;>71:ii.Ze�is�ll�� r.i#t�`�zr.'�Crau:��a'� - ��u f�I 1tl:l'4ti't.�1�'i(!?I'"r .�'[f;j;�7:1�1'!]:.1;}'V??�IiCT•',,SiC�.0 ri�i;�]?x,r�s��vi�e]]r H�.4�:n�=�?rk'ra.�t iti£� �S�cl��;��:ii�a�e�.r t4�ili�i•h� [;��,�nc�"iti e,��iel�� t ;�I..-eY l.�ki_tt`h�•�?YlL'e i 'CI(�Sf?:�t�7 1:Iir`,rh�l�lC_ �T7_71-:�C,�1�JIl't[i i�h17y�. �k�7-��, L',7i[1?�SC.U_��J<:Fi1T- 1��€.fl}��1tI�YcYC6G.j ��lC.1'i�!`S' ,��:i3.t;i0�3 z�i�I_��C O�t'.1 I.i. �}ll?�i4twlLl'�l�.k'G Of�.�r11.' i�n:,•F;niie�:Ul:i�1"sa1� �nn�en c;�in, �}�c •��I M1'�.N.=��ia.�li��l Y?5��, fi4i�,Y:JE�N�'7 2Q1,3 Lett 83 cont. N� �laswr� �fFrunet'�� n��tt�rn�ti�� #Z Draft Ei��ironmei::�l Impact R�p��'l'cansider�d n�i ly��araic��mject alt�rn3trv�s� �T��ha�ald cvnsidcr thc bcn�fit�af carr�t�ining rhe�r�posed Pro��ct n�i�h l��lasure�,� Fruneridge P��enY��Alte�na#ive b�r�t�xx�[x�g Pruneri�ge At-eiauc�t iCS pr�s�t�t�r�dc�l�d eh�o�n�in� �e Ag�le�autpus � aver Frunerid�e�venae�y means of placing Pa-u�e�-iclg� �venue in a tunn�l-aik�� sxruetu�'e,i.e., Prun�r�ri�e Avenu�Alt�rnative#� 5ec� aLL�[;7itci Se}�l�iliL��]'2�11 �ektex_n 1?TR Scr�ping respaii�e: i'runerid�e AG�enue Alterz7.�tive�? �'r`�neridge El�en�te Alternati�re Th�initial�runer:d!?e A��riue�1LirnaL'[a�� i�L��aL''Pr.ifle�'id�e A'��ea�ue c��ould remair. a�ttblic 3•oa�." r'woulrl 1'�clzl�'�ih��r��r��nt nFn��n ��acr_nn thc t�mpu;''' �amrn�nl; 25 Th�propoa�d altex•nativc #Z wvuld iicrti aff�ct thc am4untaf open spac�. �ti�auld" reqtitire tf�:�imp]ementatinn�}f 4eyarate seruri��tnechaniszns an thz��rtio:s of kh� camj�i�s nnrth and�c�uth o`l'�'urleri�l�e 4�'�t�ue," CQnrzn�n�: Thc pe�opa5cd alc�rn�tiv� #� do��u�at�•�sult z�n�€�iviu��l nnrr.�and south c�mpu�. See�e�:tiun un Sc�;��•ily wou�[�"�Qql�irP fh� r�c�nfiigurat.inn��f huild�nhs �}ii th�sitt,�hai'�c5 l'c��7e si2��nd sh�Jc of s�mr��i�iidiiYgs,�Y�gdificd a�rtss pnints�tcicl oi'her th3lt�es l'n r�Fl�ck� rfi�idPd r,am�a'.:s." �onimetrt: T�e px•apc�secl aJ�ra��ttive��d�es nvl rr�st��i.ir�R rl�-�ded c�mpu�. l�Vau�d"C�la]1ffP5•�Q ��}�(�j�l'��;rd�in�;ar,d e�ccavu:ic7�r ��an...,r�sulrin�in a�:•eater�,�alkime aF nrf•;�aiilc�c�m�ateri�ls��m��ed ta the prnpo�erl praj�ct'. S o�trc2: :�l.�r r.at i��s 1 Lett 83 cont. n�•��t�nvir�nmcr.t�l Report tiect�ai��l P�ge 59? Comr�te�ti�: �!'Lli�L2l�1C��t�V�ll�l�r��e1117t1i�C" #'� j+l�ould not requsr�the implerneutatic�r� �f s��r�ce��urit�mechanisms 'fA�oul�f not r�yui�e:lhG ree�r��u�'atio3t� ��Ua�r�quire chang�g to the prayeetgr�ding a�d�xca�atiun pl�cs hr��n�t xiee�ssaril�•a�at�r uolume of�f3F haul��rn�teri�ls Qt�'-h3u] r�y�irc:cri�til= 900,U40 u�1bx��=ards Sc�i�rc�: f:csnr.r.�tu�l lalan .`:}r 9'runericl�e A4 enue Aitern��i�� I'�E�U["G'�'I-2 2rj cont. !'ropc�sc:d Plkt�� L P�aject: Twiai:�Si=��»d Aud:��rit«n i'�z'l�in,�it1C�x�a#P ��prnxiniatn r.ut nF 1,5 36.0+7��hir yar�ls�n�a fill r�f�,f��,uOU cuhai�:y�a�'Cjs, Tkii s vd�auld result fn<t b�liilt+rr�i��:n� {ec�ir�aring ex1s�'Inb gradc ta Final sub-�racE�) o�a�?pr��xi r_�at�ly�G,UDO�:uE�i��a��ls ui ir7�por�t. �xcav�ie�l �nil is es��e,:teci tn px�ar.d (:;c�il hull�in�l h,��a�spi•o�:mate]y 3��,(�3�,�0�]tul�iG yar�.s�, yiel�liri�hala»ced �'l�asc � projcct. 1'ri�posed �'liase�I'i•oj�ct: T�xxt�� 1��:�c1��4�n,�r�t icir�ica�c appNoximat�e cut af iC��Ofl ruhic y�a�-cl;and a f�ill af 1U,�UU cuUic yards. '1`:�is�n��ault�l'e�iz1 k in � h�nl�vc31Li rne(�c�mpari►tg e�i5ll�g �;ra�:�t�a finaf suk�-cra�i�) uf�ipl��'oxA�zz�t�l��1�yD,[}tlla cubic y�ards foi'ex�o��'. 5ni�rr.Q: Pr��ao�c;� Iirading I'lan North �.�ri11�, �413 Cnmmcnt: 904,tFD�t�sbYC�rard�of�Ff-haul f�rpr�pv�sd Prur�erld��Aven�e �llle�z�a#�ve ��ms higl�compsr�d to prapo�ed riz�jec.t(Ph��1 � 0�nd Fhase 2 s 150,040 c:ubi� y��r�s. F"ri�n¢rir�gP�1r��enue Alt�rnati�+c�#Z reqiY�i�es recalculati�n of an�aff-lz�ul. � Lett 83 cont. GammenC; C,�ll�ornia►4cadem}�v�'�Gien.��s in��lden�a#� Parh ha��g�•��i rdof, land�es�pi�on its��r�f �'��}�o�k L4��st Cai�t�us iaas Pa�adscaping o��its roof �.prle's Cnrprar�te Audimrium is nndergruuu�i. S��Fkgux�[[I-11� Cox-��ra�e Audi�[►['iuxn- Repres�z�tative 5ecti�n,C�r�aft�.nvironm��tY 25 Im�act Rep�rt cont. The n�6at�tit��ns�q►��nc��as�reseut�d ia�secti�n VI A�terizati►�es in the€lraf�Enviraaune Impa�C I�epartof the s�parate Prrar��A'��ig��rr�r,�rc AItcrn�tive are not appli�able tc�the sugge�ked Pruneridge��enue�ltert��tir�e �� ut whi�lt l'r��ridg�Aveaiva is retainc�d and ccsntinues#;u b�a�auhli�:i•i�1�of w�p��d�A,ppIQ Cam��us 2 is extenrl�d �tf��-E':-�rn�izdg�A�c��nu b�r means��pla��ng Fruneridge Ayenue Sn a tunnel-€ype stru�ture and A��l� �ar�pu�2 �xten��nn the tn�nfthe tu�iitel. Lett 83 cont. EnUirar�mental lmnact Report (FfR} far A�pl� Ca��aus 2 Re: �Ivs�re �f F'run�rid�e �venu� ConSid�ration af an alternatiUe �alan: R�t�in Pru�eridg� Avenue as a r�inar traffi� conne�tor and bike rpute as in the G�n�ral �ian. �etentian would all�wv tl�e �ontin�aation �f the recent char�g� in the City of Santa �lar� partion of Pruneridge A�renue, cflnsi�tin� �f t�e c�nversian ❑f 4 traffic �artes t� 2 traffi� I�n�s, a c�n�er �urn I�ne ar�� k�ilc� lanes. It woul�l con�Cinue ta be ar� �astJwest t�'affi� cannect�r, r�ducir�t� traffic ar� 25 Hornestead A��rrue. cont. ��ten�ip�n af Pr�neri�ge A��nue v�ould be a�com��i�hed �}� �onne�ting Che hlarth an�! �Quth sectiar�s Q� Appl� �am�us z �� the car�struction of �itn�r � t�r�t�el c�r � br�d�e. The karidc�� v��uld b� th� best altert�atiU� sinGe Ap�le plan� to ��n�truet below �rade parking; t�e �xc��t�d tlirt tnrauld be used a bas2 far the brid�e apRroa�hes. The bridgE �oul� be as tivid� �s nec��sary to pr��id� an �xtension af the campus, � parkv�ray, � �e�f�5tri�n v�+�fkw�y, and /ar transport�tiQn corri�or. Sin�� s�curity is a con�er�k the �f�v�ted surf�ce �rea w�uld no� �e accessi�i� t� Lett 83 cont. th� pubJi�; s�curity p�rim�ter a�ong �r�rneri��e Avenue ��ould �e a contin�a�ion �f the s��uri��r p�rimeter arQUnd the r�st �f the Ap�l� �:ampus �. lt wt7uld s�ti�f� �he �roject ohjecti��s oF `'cr�at�ing� � �hy�i�ally �nifi�d ��mp�� ommunity that r�spe�ts Apple's security need5 in R�rt thr�ugh perimeter pratection." Th� desi�n could `�pr�vide an exp��se af t�p�n and gr��n s��c� tnr Apple empfo�e�s' enj�yr�-�ent," ar�a�her proj��t 25 �bjecti�e. cont. Th� r�t�ine�! location of Prun�ridg� A�r�rtue cla�s n�t �fFect the Apple �auildin�. The City ar�d �pple wou[�i n�gotiate for the r��c�ssary air �iq;7ts f�r the hri�lge; similar ta the air ri�h�� re�ar�ir�� W�If� ��enue �aridge be�ween t�� west �and east side af the 11�I1�Q 5hoppin� Malf. Subrr�ittec# �y Q�rref �um on 5eptember 19, �O1 1 Lett 83 cont. ; - . , .. L7 o tnEcy i rtsnF Ks ins m nry � � 5��,�.roa �m:.. 1.�.��r.f}�1. S+ii peHVVl�� :R� �4yl;�}U:LDIyG . "Nf'I�� 86:,C:X? i �ia;�armorr� voryann C�iplr�ces -t.,. ;'4'+!1::M�.�+y- •� � � . 7:t]U -�� : . ':��rflti:rtu�.n t� T... . � i�+�l - "1q�od 0��-r-.r I r,� �RUi ,. "�< I;.-.p-aiy-� . � � �-;I�p 6 I ' ill�ie.�.. .�.o..i.��Y[ f � � • _. . �n .`� '� qM1}JP r��Of 0�06 I - � • . ' �c.J_:In�f�oi�e�:-.:�ca S �•� yri Ay:❑�k hu W ' � . C . r . . r . � 6;x�� j . • r�,..��n,i. :.FeJ�r.a ai. � , �r� �0�,Y'�!i �: a • a.Er.o=o x� H n�•:k•• i �-`�.�.-C .�. i�: .L44;:41 al I y '''�� •� �~ � �^�� . .• P.rhflpta¢rar _ �'�� f,� ;r.,, Gry� 26 � Y;17'1 •�-n � 4y. : . �3� l.;. `��?'� t r ,�f: `t,� �." :y4� I•�i�axt i � �� '�.�r� o,a��; �; �7 y G'mCi'a�� • : �a, � � �.�?uei , san000�. ��"° � �`� �._..— � eENrrta� t[Ilildlfl;l F30�11E'i P4Riil' Aflarye 3 I !19][Lf':.is �� y��{ t�r:iE I PAR N�NG �� '.r34.i�Y:tl. �9TqlICTUAfi. /6 . • � ' _ - ':Lp36r'I • - - bSRCt*��A. rrec:a��;N . -].C,40 U Y: , `�n . . ;� - [:w.ri dio-e � . ' ' ' ' . FYi�I!r � .._.."""'.�..._..... _ . • .. . . � •E.:�:�.ei .. . . • 4•::ia.�i ' Fl��ti�i . � ' 'l:�Y�J]P:I " 6:e�:nY' � : T7�.4fA.L " . ' ' .'�fepiYd5{7f� � �4CIEISIQS h"[�'��"; , - . . . �w5 c:r�e . , • - - � E��tl� • E�.�:lr.o � Prei�Eidpadw:nea�Al[erruxtiva .. ��. -r.��.n; ! V Ni7�1c:w�8n,iriyAwe:� "'__—____'_"_""_'_'_"_'_'_'_"_._'_'_'_'_'__......-...-."'"........... ... - . . . ........... . . . .. . .. . . ....._....._...."" � � � 1'1C=��tL '}I `l M'!l'.L'��:r-1' .ryiz�riB f�(17:fr�:.ti'e Y:'Gif:':��'.1�� SI�.1121'F" .:+F'I I' 1=F .`f , ta��ep�ual E'lap •los� i=s�.t,�•r�dge t:ver��A�• Alt.i�i•n:�r.is.a 1-'.:.'•:1:.'I!L I�t�}de�_an��is_�_ui.r_s:l-�ti_�=1�:r ;S•'?L?.=1 Lett 83 cont. .....:..,_ ...-. -....._..-- - ------�----------------._....... .._..-- - ._ ._..._ -...- -- - --- -------- ---- ' � . �aYs�pkmpp9`-a�nnlxry .. . .. . ..i.c Nmi :na•�, � Nm ty �rl�x-Tm�+�r R1'?P F'c:rn�F!] 1'4'A i.ui�.b$1��ui�Ni' ��IR� ��'.-�� .MiAH]iii:lld whY 3vf[t FY.i4'J4kN� A 7t �' �x�•.(:hser.i y - 5wuo I: _ � �- �e:�;CG.�.Mt�, ! — iL'+: ' ._* .� �'u,�i•1��1^ai:IF:�n:l � - :�4�ii " rg` � � r�si U1r•�v - � �?%.. i' i �3 .FC.:4S - � �., . .�. :r�=� :�n•.,.:� • o I , � . � � L{n�l FIp�441� r � "N � ' ir..r.��-iyf'h�W.�{q,:;�..,� � • :i - :aii{bYn�PS;nq _, y � �._.. . :eb�r� f � { 45]i,uLk�61. . �f� � i�-nFn:rl . . " 8tii:.4rlG0.�. �� ' �� i-::2.g4V:�. ",� �• r_, �� f/�CLI��'bcN �.. � r= '�i .�.i : 26 •, '�->�� -�:•� ~r �c2r. �� ,rf. �° �,� �� f=�`,�.�'" �„�,� cont. ��, �f;� �� !A,aAr� I . � ��':�,.�;r Y"�• I:Y f.7'ah;•s ; w�� .� ' F I.?'W eea�n�a , � . _ GEM:!4! � �:� i ' Y'4�{Y� 41r_.. � � Y �� ; �`�.' f!V'��1G FbnIFT'll� a�au5ues � �� r,��a.,g 318Fi[Ilkl - • - SYRUi11ef�L� �a:ra�z:hr� • • ;� {� - a ;i r�nfax� • • - Hna�r��y� ' • _ �lMC:��r•�a � .KA:LXI f 1 ' • � � GfpdP�alBi • I � - ' ., �... .. ..J . F.vU:., � .... .. . . . - . ._xrw • , �.a-��••. , 14•rrua: - aaR.�ro-ru- ' A7 a•:.r 4;i�1TAf1 ' . � �w�f.t7Z� • tl•1�:x�'� vaci:i��a . •�+�,�:: � . .. - . � r.hr.nfi.��: _"_' cS'....:L':L Prur�eridpe Qs,on•ra.AltErrrrtive • "`''' r..;,s.,�c' i It� '��_�'r�.n-:R�s..{r.i;;�ro:r . . ................"'_'_""_' _____"" ....'._"_. L 5 � Frc_�;,x�. �l-�� .� .,..:��.. ��p:e i�e�7�s�,ri,,,��.:►�rFR Sv.��Cf'�.�y�l f..:-�priu>_a3;. C:nn�-ep�ua: F;ai1 tit,� Pr1�,:��r;�;;P :!,ve��ue?�l�ern:�r.i�c .............. . .. . •-.•-... --_•_•—••- • _._—.._�__••••••-• • ••-••-.. . ..�.:•:%�11Y .1p�,yf'•�r�.�c:-di�+nr.i�f��,[..?ui ��ih�:ll' -'.-'."- .- Lett 83 cont. , . ._ .�- _ _ _ ::, ,,:�:�,.,r � F �:i; ;�-;.. -,,:. ��.:.5 r I -�'L;�;'��`'•;ij;�4'-::"=;-.s':�.';.';,c � �1 t '.c _ c�_ � _ °.'i:,. '•i`::�'r`?.•. � - - - .L-.-.�.:;�:.::•.�';�';�.::`i:�'. f�� = �i% .1�:.`,'��i.%`��:-��'••:. '.it`� c; _ i I �� ?'�J�':;;2 ..?J��.-kr`;i�3 �tis��..-'�.,,,��:��.'":'_'.'_'_�.:i' - :.7'.•� ��i�::'-:.��T;r.:.,; •j ' ��.:;;-.� �.;;�'�.+;C_:SC:, q�.7,�' .....;%`i ��ri.:....•: - Z, - s r�. -,. :: , _} t ��';;:•�. ,`. +!� I �' 1y _ •.,;t';`;`°�:"-�::'::�:;':r;-;�: ;�;�::�;;:��=::.:�;,;�,;•: °::. '•�• ��i��i.k9�t::rPi'�}��L.S= �.5..::•,. . , := :.:. =.yY�::••-t�.;-� .X.��;.y: � -� " "3 5`.'+:.._,_,. :5��`� . 'f.'-'.. - �''2•:.'- ,�.F.'.�.:..:'� ,,,.. -. r{ � y� :..[^�- -_1'�.'r�S:s�::i,: '":,, ��'• . . • ='�,.=: w� _ `��'�' _ _:�r�:,:'��;::�:`�.1=7�';.,•_•:-••,i.".::�,_-;:r�i�•��':�'•.�;':;; :'� C� _ ,-ti,- ;y ii:':=��_i•.�'f•.ra_ - '�{•s••':.".:�r'..``` ';'1,-:.�c •�'.�,-.:'��`�3i�;};'�r=�_P'';,� ,.�. ;�'t.; `•:r;, ;�•.1�`:1...:.,�� I {� ,��' -�..�_. _ �..�.� -,•.-• �_;: _ Yy _ - '�y:'rc.;`;_:�. G]]':�,Yt -i1i:. - ..y:�.: :5:�,;<'�-:."i � • _",L},'^ - ;=rj�r .�i::',. �- "'i:. ;lo;;:,�:�'.''•:_- ^ � a. �;'r=••:;i^_- ,<='ti'. _ �c-.t�':::_:��-.:,:;: � � .Ce•i,'-:y+°<.�iF',�`r4:�-' ,';"R,� ':�y _ _ ,�j':•;:.:�-:.qzi�•.._ :.�.._ � x - .;i-_ _ .'=�':'yli 4.'-!y.�-C:i<:y5�y.::j' - -- ,r:: ~:i.:.. - - --"'" � �:I: it i:f�'."t��i�,'` - -�-Y.S .'�5.'."'.'' P :;R`'.- ;•. =,�.? _ �'T";,.,f.:-'_;.i`:f_r`.^.s��;;`_i:,...,. �� f `,:c:•i `,"s�.t�i:i ,.;�i,A.�"'`'�'i=�-•;-,�•:, L �:�'�'�� ]. ," " �sd� .....-•.:�_�..: . . ...n.�.�':;='r; +;•:��'F�-'� y, � ;;�F'J` '; .:.� ��.:, i�;�,...i1.-.,..:�•:.�:'� .' �'�'."':�4,''�':� �'� _ Y � .�-,�''•'.l�ii�ti,�,: .r: . _1�_•.�..�.'."��:'""il:':+�:::�1:'�':17:��.i,� � 1✓ .:�:. ��y;.,�' -:s��.l��il;r.:�:. �..::, _'�:�.��,`:':"::':-'.-' ' . ':�::.f:�-i�5=::•'�:4'..,��t"' ":.... .:,.... '.'• . ::�•.:y}':� i.;�.i,.-.+.i!�':�T�'._:S.'::'.�;� - . -�S'�=.1�::';.,�', .:I.�-'�.7::�.�,..: ..:.-�'.."".�= '�j ::._:i-�.i;�•-`s,'�::��;=�?�::•::.:::, �+';':,tf-',: t��y,;�.:.,;�•::':A��r:n•:i?��::: - „y:�: � �J :�'i:�. -i�i.,y�::�cs,� .;;:..:ih•�.y1..:;:si:�::C:;•.:.,.:,t:r�:�_':i�';;r.�T::�: � -- § �� .?`�?' -�;i,;, ...�':t....::_;.::.��:�' :. ,..:::::.:��..:N�ti'7'.-'i:i: ��' �,�i.s =;?�S� .:�;... ;`t•�:<...;..;.�'�.. �,:..;.,��'.�.. -� � ��.�S1�S�- ! �,�. � ,:5�:' I�i1i��:,::{.�..::�.:-,��4;.�..�:� �J � '�:F,SS`-'��l'.'�:� ',��,� ^�� - `r.:-`.�l-��:.; - , I '- Y i _ _.ri��:. ��!:�ti'•_s '''4`i�7r�',',5''.. :rt:'i'.�T:�:: _ 'ys i��:�i�i.2.S`-::'' _ ;_;�:,�;,.r,r`i, _ ;..r ti.';�.�:.'�� • ' �"l�"�"��t"��?�� " •�I:�..i.k..:.��._�'�.�'�.�,5�_.t�::,��:::•� - i ��_ ;��;:f:� _ �:,:�;;:k:;��;: :��::�:-;�::`, . , .:. ' =:.t .s., s- ..,�:4.,s,._,.��=:..,::,:�;:-;:,�_�::-: I ,,::'S:ti...S._w.. �.�}^,: .,' .� .. ,,_ s•:�••- � "`;t:•. ,t..-. -..s�.. , •.�;;=....:;: '=L� �-�s�-"SiC'l?:.: :�-;r.'r':��•i',"i:�r �'%ei.:'.:i�`.ii-��::��r� .?. -as' _ .iyti;. .:;��,?5i;::.;.`•.��'i..::'�;�fs:�:.';:. _ �, I �v7ir�A�ai?:� ..�,_v..._ _ -'- ..�L�.`i.�_.�y��:�.�'�Pi'.,�.: �� ' �� '=�'i.: �' .J _ _ ..a{:�... ;;y'•_';�'y�l�.��;3;• ' ':_':i�l=`'• --..a�:n�;:..,._ .p.i:�,��c' �. t' :3„-.•"��-. .E�:.'-�;i;..;° 5 �5�:':-; ti..,.. � _ ...t .'':i�`�.'�. ':� j"i'r�,1:''•."(•. t.;::'i �5:i' .,G t ��i.Yi'�'•' .�lli��'.1i� . . :..�''".4.-rv:t"J�.i°�.::�'�1 �'`ti•-'�.. �;y; , '��F•:�::�:?_�'.;'•��' � "•,",i��:�: I 's'�: j:s i};;.,'.�. ,�1,°.!::�,k�f�;:�,�:;��t;'•:5�::,'Y'.. ry I '.`,��'�:•:L.`-::.3:i::'�..�..•.;-,�ili��'.:�i:�'>`-'�'�ii.�•:� :.�_;�•,1::-;;;;..;:�;��jt�:i! .�., .-..�3a� •,:.�:,:;' ,•;,.,;�,._ �:�::;:. ,.q.3,�r'1:-'�,,; _ ,�..t��•..�:5;;''r'.�;":F, :�:'i i�ti- .,:�,_.. . . . :+`c.�r:•`.::r�•.� y j .:. ..�: ;. . t:- i�.�:�:;.:•�_ �f3;�eF..?'s..u,-};�,�c;��ti AN;:Z:..��x•.� __�2:',c'_l�±:i�:��:.��;:... ..t�-`'ry'` S ..b� ._�tiL.; i�Sc��;'�+!�til'•;�';;°..�..(E.�:.�:iS�:t::,i��,�y:rk'4t 5 � F ,,. t .:;:.. r�iA i.:'�i';�';::; ]:5r..:��-�.�' �? i— ss�.y ',;t' '.`' . .r4!�.{�:-?.":;, �,34�. }'.�;.�;;_; ..�r^;, .. . ••�;`�.-:,i - '�--�a..tc!�"`.�i�'�l':�i 'e �.7 �.'- �}::;4�:�i:.�. C �.' u.: f. _ � ,Yi�•ii�• '�r.: ;.�. ..�'��'•��+`�='`�:'��t:�:��::...;�-r�'t�.:�•�ia>'i 5•.z:.�;-t';'"S.'-i�- :� _ �,�:..': � �:.;•: . .:�.��.:�,��i�. ��`�� a Y+z::":'�: ?;ti�.�ti S Yr:i�'��:.�:`:i j�;�.•. .,.��..� •�'� y .-�::�'.�,r,i.:..�; ;-t t��:� . ��i•,'.i�'_.... S.i .[� '.5-' . �.f.x:..:. il;� . '-.%fi, .. ,a;��_, -''. , `r�� .��.:i":. x;r.::�'. ,y.i��yq..�.ti :. `., y;•:...��.-:?i•.y.�t_.ti:1'.°��'�' k. 1�y�:r_.. i::� .�5':�=. .�;�y?• -•>i •.i Y, .::-i.rL.,�.-:� •is:::: ��_.i:F�'�-:.: � •�,.,:;. ��1z � �• �.._,,:. ��.. `-.,., iyti::a;;i,=:� .-.:t-; `�:;'.�,:�;:;.:;;.�'5�.,,,:, � r -.c:. - �'�:• • � . ��.,_:�°;',..,-2�t f ' �,��'y'-i��.:. '�;�.��r!:'.:;;;�:��?::-•:�:�•ry:�,.�'` , .'�.;:.�..�.• r::�.�,.•.: -•� � y _, . �y...,;�';: �k•'-:: S' - •.�y.� y;; ..:..,��,ti:;y'�i�'.�'�+:i1•.�'�t;S�ti;::'-•::..._::=i ':�� j�-:;yi< �f�., r:;,�.,::Z� �µ,-;a�: t::>.�;�•�•1 '�,..ii�'dri=.�'.1�.'�'.:..1:, .�.i��i:k'::;i::�; 1i",1''.�:�...::�..,. f ti�:i:i I ... r-s -�-.:.st 1•__.�,>�.. <<�2: ' -ti.5'.'-••>>-. ,.j•��;'.,,"i�.5;�- •�3, ��: �� ::;':�- •�•.:,.�:ti.,...:�±.:;�, . ,.:,;.-='`�� 26 _ � �-t.r:��'•= L;�'-,��r�'•-i,�:;..,,.;'c!;.:�•..�.�,�:;�:.:�:l�r,.: �;i.�•e::;Y•.",- t .�.•�: � -7� . -�• --F.�:'.r }• �:. �.,.��-:'• . .l�.�:� 'v 1'y r i;•�..;<�F'r' .•"�-,t;:Y � �`. -�_:.,�, . k Y'i� i ts��;:fi .??,:..�;• �S �....;[.•; �-"i�:,.,�T-.:i',.� .:t;�e;;�±i�.t ,.,.Z>;;W,,: .5:;`��`...`i;.�`:'�==�:. fr Y`' y�} •�� ::'•i�3 �:w; :Yy� . . _.-�� .. .:..,:1.•;�'.:i•�:`':��..•� —I P� �I� '�� .:1��„'�` _;�Ui .;�;:• %Yy.�.,k. ..Y.':.��;.....�.Y;i.:i �^�' CO 1 1 L. . l '�5�'. 1 " .�t''.i `-'��:t'�:.;��"�:'.�:::�::�i.' :.y...:� U' � ;:i�� %":;��5�. ` .� :�� .�:...:�.�.::-... �;•,� .F�.3_'��ii, r., . �,;i=...�� .. , '.i�. • •-''S •�•�;?`s�''=:�'i:'i;•i...;. .}'::�e?:':'�:�.`:;'=':'�.-• �a •' .;'::ti„ `':�.'�=�i�i`�.ti:c.: i.�..:�.•.;'�•�.� _;:��:N;,ti;:: _ .j� `{tii,._��'-��.��.._ . .��5'r,':-+'.'�:ir:�:,.. ..y..:;�:::.,_::.�..:.{i�� . ,'��. ��i:;:'.'c_=:.� i_._ .. ~ -��.�'.�`�''�'i- '�"',:.R '?,;^ :1.-.;;�.. .. ?.r;.��°�;�-_� �.L--- •.5 �';:i�};�r.ii,��%�:r:,+"4�3��1�.i4:'7;'"•�'=ij�i::`c?�`.'j".��:��;';-�ii.;;i t 1� .(�:�.�.:.5..:•..::•.�• .:� xir " �.r.�,.�. .qz:.r?�:. ,1... r.`..:�: .:,U`:_�.:�,_�i:i�;:.;',: -�q,.',.?;i:'i:i.;-- �.;Y':..t="11::.:i't:." ...�-��'.�`.:•�. ".: :l'.i':i i .'l"'.:'�Yi'".:':� ��„+•'- ' :'.�•i;i:.::.1:.�iY.S,:r . '.- .:_. .�4.r:: ;_� ;L}, -: �5::- ��..::�?':.'�.,�a,�'-y.;.;.�� :�..i.-`.. - i�i�;�i�.�,'�.��`��k?.1`.;!tF��::i'iC�i.�r��.5,:'i?:+��::�`��-:`,�:�i�t;ir:��s_k. ' ,.�� tF�ty,.N� r�s�--�i L ly.x.:�+� .F�.°.:..�l.Yi�tii�� c�.\." ..:i: :��ic_ �..L�:.�... .::' � t•t'-?'+�.�. .i�� :! ' �.. .. e,-'f.=r:� 3 f.'.. .C=�•• _ 1_'. !i1f:i�.'.i•�l,'i '_1:�r.:'�t,�lS.t�:�.SL:y .�•:_.'.,l. '.':S.'":'......�•.:� ..:'��"".. 5'�...i.,.:..=•� �15. . :�i �,� •.y. -•�ni�•.}.i.-.':.. �1-�•�..: �:�{.L:•...}<:�r:�-.'...,�i::��. $.�•.:;t_, t' 't... �... ; iJ;7!y' � .I.��yt;''�.[t•�.?.'.,'.,,=iF::tif','[l'�:�t�--',�e��rc�;},�:_'i''-,�'•��'�-• � �.J'l: IJ'ti.r — I:. y},. _ '.S.�-.,,.5=�iy S, l}. ;"''l. �x: 1 .'.'l -.��::�.1 �. .':',::'-::1:1't�:�:t':::. s:�i�i," � `�:• . ;'�;' '�•:�. �s..��:avr.i��...� ' :� _ t"�i�s�i'� � "�� j�.,�.�•....:,f,.:' ��,:[':.-'.•':5:':�• �....t.��'.:;��.. , _� 3 tl�:1�., . ,_1.-,;.;:':il:,:"!:. ,., : .. ',, . ' F i}.. ",i�.':�.';:�•yi�:!.?::�=:. ;1:':��•::�.:..:::�'�n>�:�=�;�:'�i�:'.'�i ?:�; �''�:..r'� '�`'�'�� I +� •:z�.� _'.:i...;��.,`.:,.,:,::... . . ..:,��'... ..r,.�• : ..�.�•:i.. .: ��•`i:: �I �d if ii-: �. ?i-}i;i�:Zp;.,:;;::�',�`�:i.��=';��'. �i�y11i:s.! I ��' ��A�..'.I:i;�:'i:'•.::�..... .t,. :i'�::��:_=ti:.�y: � f : ', - S"::�:...,:::'iii�Y.:_•.:�.t.. ......i.' �-�•y'1�1�:Y.•ii'. I �.ii�}�}.�j:,�:[:;:.i:i•.:�1:��f1��'.+i.�;..::-I. . 4 � ls...� I` �';.;.[:.�i :��:r..c.M1::. �1.._ ��':5'i:'1�`:�;�:,:,. . �-i��5`•�i I .II J.. ` : �'.._ ''i:��:��;y�i:.�..,:�: .�,� lr�:��,-��•!„ '!.r��i�i:':i�f:.S�I�:.:'-;'�:i:':��:`':�,.�r;.�': ;,•._!••',: M1 1.i. :.f.;�..��. ..1,-�•�.7'.... .- �.:. : :': l?=n?�'�:5}: • ��.'"'•' '.1:'i.'':.'.;i. ..',i'�;..:;•:i:•'� �i�:'>ii:•. ��;�, :..:'�.'• �;�: ;,,i", �;c:: _ ::.t;:;;� -o^F Iii �'I:AS'••�'::i��:.:'�f.i .:S•��_.;i:��.; -.,i.�' ;'. ] _ ..y'.1.d 1zl:: '.1.�:i�� ::��:� .�: � '.G=:: l t�i., •='�'"�'1';��';�.�'....� �:�':k:;i':;ti;�� ?�ry: C , �' �! - ^.��; `.P[': :1. .'�5'.�.•:....�'..5�.. ': .•, . 1 `�� H�• _ �•� s]-':S�:E.��-�.�� :t::,,:i ..... '�..'.:. i��[:t;!�l_��::� . ty � �K'�- �i � - 'f��'`�`�'i.r��.:i;:i�,r3i i�i•ii:�i�'�=i��,�..:..,.. ..r........ p1 ' �:.?n'•.i:'-,,,"��:.,?�y,:.:5'� .W�,,�1`:J�S� - '�';ii c!�i:'i.i:.�..�:�: .:c:,•.ii;i�;..:t...�..:�.��:S]'.::.;.c.•�. .,� :j.....;;,,:..••�.,:``•• ,�r.��':C •- ., i.{:;� ..,i :-.�iF�c`.n �S'.,ti. i_k'�:•.. .�.:i�.:�:'::,;;.;�:;;..r.:. ':"e�i7 r...,a... ..��- �3�'_:;{r,.t� ;j� i,.re.. .1,��.:•:�.: �. eti:r.�•:.,�::.;'•-�'. - ��';..::.�:.Y�:;�.:�,:,:.. �:�f�k::. �. �,:.. ...�::� �;;•..L�,:;''; ; ;� ��i�:'. .:�i � r�.�... .._ �.ii� . " •t'�.��. ��:� ' :� i.;.,:.'i �`i1i'�''l��`�N��+:'u��.: '::Y .i''�" •�A r ::E:ftiz]. � -f,'t,;'�i"��i�Y�:�'��I;1�•,;i'�� ''-��-,1',;�-:i... ,'�i:"�'i�..:.::.:.5- ��„ . ��:S�..i . '�'i:.:,.[.1::Y'c. .i�:ii:�t�'�'�i�7iai'i't:.i:a,:..�. ,�,� f _ ��5:.�,c,,: _ .;i1.:ii,�.;,x... _ '.1., �:i�'� •:]`.:;�.c;_'i.ci::. �'�i�i�[;Tk:� 5�:: iia:' �':r.�'r:��1•�i� � �e. �,S`'=.,z� '.is' �'�' .. ,.I � �5 ;:�: ;:5:' .;p'..� . ii'.,niii�il, : .` '� '.,� ° - �F.. ii:..� - .,-}�x� �n;�,� i��?Y-�?i.f�i:'i,:�i�i.45�;.�..;.. ;:l��u:'.+-� - - L ... .''i'i��r.�<y��., ...:�r: .:-�' :ti� - �it�'V.r� is':.�.. . , ..;•';��;L::�-..r:•:::'�l',:'.'...". �.:;.'� - _ I 1�.-.ik�;:' h;u..::'�'s:�y.��?c•�=�rY��i.��' '��.:�r�i: �`i�*..�;i�' -�;�•,�.±c ;o � :i�i'-y''�' '.Sa `?: _ . _ :;,, '�.-� - �•.y�'luM:}r �l�•,+.;�'-;��'��:?��L:. ..�:.!.. .:�:5`�•' y i .t:. ,ie:: .:>-�: . .:i: .�r:�; _ .•<�Z:l' - �[:'�;-• Yi`:`� i;'�::``ii''�.f'��;:,�•�-.;;.e .'•�i'f�.: i •i�"t:�,��,.,'�, _ �:';��!_:� ._ .rl:v'.'�r :.�f'�i.,1'r :.f�' - i'.F.:::, r��5:.!+°'::4:'+'?:'�:..-:-�;!:�u'��le''.:'i^i�,�::.c. !.��i`; •�':a+� ;''�}i•! - ..S-:,11•, .C�'t�:�i)';'',;i:'�.�I'e�•:';';'7" - ' ;.r,� '::�," 'f''c.:.rl_i`'::='l�..r.��'.�,•'•�::..•:.:':;:='.:•'n't;:: t `� '�, ". _ _.�`��:`,• .iy:itt'!i;i;;.s . ::i::i.�• ._-.., . .� � �. �� '�.z'y: x :��'x��i;�.r•,� •,�i'ti`��:i+'::=::;::,.::�_�'�•::i•�:::,,1,`�[:�.•'.'. y � � .�: f�.`;� � ,.��. _ - ti:�:: :y,t,, ,� .. .. � ��' ?;t'� s�c'"�ii�. �'��`::'�i?::=:AS�;.i- •`��?.'..,.. ;��i �',. • :1�:`� .^"��•'4.._�:.�• ��. ..:. .. yt,. . � :?!�5 ��'�`- - � -":�ti-:;..��.:.i•�.:�.:'::i'-�=:r.::• iii�:-I;:ir"`' -•,��' - C �.l �'�ti�•.;•.:.. ..t .�iy.��`'. �,i�?F�: 'r�^`�i:.y'. ,r1 :-t��'= .. �e....tu�.:L:�- .f 1' eV`��• � . .y, y'�•. „�r.i'y.�r;:a`.;',::5•.;i:'?'::,;.'.' f}� .�'rs'Y.y.'i: I i� . " '- :;i'.:.!i':Y�:��.��` :. Y:i�.F,��,•�': 1�� . �,�'"if:�r':i'i�� ..3y.^�!:�•. ::�.!' '� `�' [�..1'��r.:.;••.. in.-..Y;iy.; 5..3;•.;:.-:. :`�i:`.-��':'`�r'i �. _^_Y•. •-i�y�l=.i: ��"�.,,,(2:•1:15"i'i��•:.�i'", - ��.�: �'J �ti'�`-% - .r•3.i•� .��*.f�i� - !:;::�.,,`.,,i;.�....:.i�:::f;`,:.i; ' � c ;��,;..«- _ .p��,��' �..i:ti'.•�::�:::r:,.i�:�k;S.::._. z:�y',•...� .,�'J S?:-� ::v��1�`Ei;.v��.�_;i}?r:'-�'�- . • ti�-�y:..�. . •�;:G x [: ._..�_..._. _.......... .... y:l y :.�.:..��'j'. ..'..:, �:� 1 1.3� 4�s'.�4.ie'{y�sv�'s,ti�:r:�' .2 . . ;:�T�-,�6�:..::x:y',:- -r•.;= - -_C:°-�t�'i�?i'.i::.;'_:r:'.'t::._�r_;}.••- -- - J .� .i`: y Lett 83 cont. �'igures�'r�rm Ura�'t En;rirn�rrE-��ntal Impact R�p��t Fi�ur� III- 4 �ite Plan r'fgure lll - .�h Sit-e Pl�n-5��3 th T'i�ure III -�b R�:�r4��ntativ� 5�;tti�n� �'i�l�r� Iff-��t� C�r�aflr•a�c Auditorkurr,-Rc�r�:�cntati�� e��i�� 26 cont. �igvre TT[ - 12b I'�t:.se � I)r.vQ�npment-�'lan a�7d ��iuii f�i�ur� I�I - 1Sk� Cr�r.�e�t�Fal Lx�dsc�a�,c: P�an- S�utlz Figi,r�VI - � �.nn��ptua? Fla� t�r Pr�[��riii��v��lue.ryilCCi'Tlr.�l�]�rC Fl�ur� �I - � !rI��ili�c�f:z��►��ptua'_ f'l�n trn�Pri�n�ritl�e Avenue.+�lke�'i�a�iv�#z Pi��a l'�•-�� Pro�QSed C;r�ding Pla�i��c�f 4�1 S�9�� Lett 84 From: Mark NEatsumoto [mailto:ma�km��uper#ina-chamber.orpl Sen#: Wednesday,]uiy lfl, �013 43�PM Ta: City Cvun�il 5ubject: 5upport Far Appie Campus 2 pear Mayar Qrrin Mahaney and City Councilmembers, The Cupertino Chamber of Cvmmerce Board of Direciars would like to suhmit their vfficial letter af support fflr Apple Campus 1 2.We are excited about the�enefits this prvjett wil!generate not only fvr vur lo�al businesses and�ommuniry,but farthe entire 5ilicon VaEley regian.Thank ynu in advan�e for taking the time to cQnsi�er our comments. 6est Regards, Mark MaYsumvto �V1ark Matsumoto,Governmen[Atfa�rs 5pecialist Cupertina Chamber oi Corrrmerce markmC��uperYino-�ha m6er.�rg {4fl8}25�-705A x14 24455 5il�erada Ave Cupertino,CA 950i4 Please eonsider the en�iranment hefore pnnt+ng this email. Lett 84 cont. Ju1y lfl,2613 � — — Niayar�rrii�Malsoncy aiid Cuper[ina Ciry Couf�ril Cupertlna CRam6er uf LnmmercG �.U�7�1"[llli7 Cl[]7 F�a�� yavraariner�n SN1cvn vapey 103U�Torr��Av�n�re CLipertinn,CA y5i134 Cupertino Chamher ni Commerce 2a�i55 SilyvrtidA A�pniie Gupeni�lo,CA 950ia 3�e:5uppt�rt For Apple Campus 2 ?e1[408�?.52-7C�54 1=ax�4Q6]252-Ofi38 www.cupa rii n o-cnam ber.wg Dear Mayc�r Mal�oney and City Coui�cil Mcmhers, 2013 enard of Directors The Cupertinn C:hamher of Conmzer�r�3nard flf I]irectnr-s strnngiy su��nrt tiie��ple i:ampus svard�Tfieers 2 pr�fcc�.Thc timcly:{nd si�ccessful cnm��icii��ti ol'tliis prc�j�ct is oF critical im��or[an�e tn �e�in MeClelland,Presiqem Leeward Finarrcial8 Insurance Cupertino a3�d the Silicon VallGy region frpm hptl�an inno�atinn-6ased znd eraiimnir- S�rv�sln�. t1e�eIt�pmen t perspecti�e. Jahn 7irelli.Pas!Presfdent Recnlogy Sou[h 8ay Apple[nc.is a worl[I leader in pruducirzg en�irozzmentally rons�ious,izin[��3[i�e and heautifully designed rrmsumer el�rtrohics,software ai�d persniz�s!cc�mputers.Their prnpr�sed aarcy Paul,President Eiecl 175-acre�ampus continiies Apple's trend aFCaki:ik a leaciersliip rnle in e�ery�nde.a�ar they �aultawGraup,R Prolessianal undert��te.Ap}�le Campus 2 will Featurc gi-oundbi•eakin�design and a�7 u��preredentec3 CQ�� cummirm�nt ta�nviro:iroei�[ally sus[�inal�lc print�iples.[n adclition,the cr�mp��s�vili he.3�15t- Mike Rohde,VPSpecial Everils eeitit��ry worltpla�e that will fnster and shapc the Future nf tecti:lningy. va��cnsr,oppi��9,ue1� Aash�l Yatlegan.VP Membershlp With apprnva�nf Apnle[:ampus�,Cu��ertinn and the regian will 13e the L�eneFiciary nF Apple'S f)evelapmbnt signiticant�nar�cial in�estnten[in nur city. Tlie niw campus anc4 rlp��le's co�itinued prese��ce WeS+VafleyCnmmunify5ervic�es in Cupertiizn are expected tQ generate: Mau Wheeler,VP Flnance 2 !MG W Pubfir.Rccaunfan+s • 24,000 j�i�s in Cupertino. picnard�tlaian,�p�ac • a1dD Miliion tl�nded by AR4}le For roadway,[taf'fic�ind landscape irnprnvc�men[s, Rtvlala+��awQilrces communiry I�ene�ts and ane iime fees t�the Ciry ofCupertinu. • $i5i1 Millim�cach year in sales fnr C:upci�tina smal]husif�esses includinK nur hntels, 8arbara Pe�xlgian,VP Cor7�mun[ly Flekal lons restauran�s and retailez•s frmn Applr e�nplayc+r�s ac�d supplicrs. cupenirrn++,.r • $£3.6 IIillinn anizually in safes fram goUds and servires purchased 6y App�e Frnm mnre thazi 7i]U companies in Cupertino,5unnyvale and 5aizta Cla��a. sanqy�ames.VP HRa staning Lel�igh Ce111e�1 Cempan� • $57 ARillion in t�ix reveni�e earfi ycar ta local go�ernments in 5�tita C1�ra Coutity tti rund essrnt�al neigt�6nrhuod anti rommuiiity services. Board Members Janice Chua A}�ple Inc has consistecitly and signiFic�ntly sup��arted the Ci�pertinn rnmrnunity.Ha�ing The arrrer�sweer wz�rl�4's most iconic cunsumer-t�chno�o�;y�ninpa��y Uuild ti�eir rent�rpiece R&F]cam�3us iz� aur town�vill r�atl benefit khc biiski�esses an[1 residents rrFCu erCinu.Tliis ram�i�s wil] Y�y��hugii � y � � S[a[e Famr Insurancc� make the city azt e�en m��rc attraclive draw f�r I't�tt:re residri�ts��nd t}inse I�olciiig tu riiaite in�estments in nur cammun�ty. nncor,en 81ua�ight L'inemas 5 We![�ok farward ta tl�e fut�ire success nFthis pi•ojert and we l�o}}e to�vnrl:with ynu te�lielp it FAike Fauikes 17ec0[Tli a reillity. Rpple Inc. SCUtt JBfig N58C 8enk iJSA,N.A. 5znrere2y, M�110sh Nihal3nl ' / .1awPls rn S1yle ,� �_ � �� {��-��G Tamon Norlmaio PG&E Ke�in INcClelland Mar�a sueepy 2013 Presid�nt ri�e Cypre55 Note1 Cupertino Cham6er�FComnzerce Kelth WarnPr P�crfic I9usiness Genlars KeiIChllo Yoshida 8ay Cluh 5ilicon Valley Lett 85 Fram: Sam Ashknaz �mailto:SamC�EDCCupertino.cam] 5ent: Mpnday, ]uly Q$, Z013 1�:53 AM Tv: City CounCil 5ubject: CampuS 2 ❑ear sir, 1 sincerely suppart this project,This wifl bring Iots vfjohs and it will be gvod for local �usinesses too. 1 this this is the best tF�ing even ha�pen fvr city of Cupertino. All the �est! 1 Thanks, Sam Ashknaz (]►t�ner�[7perator f Eaix•s � =t Erik's Deli�afe 1.965�Ste�ens Creek Blvd Cupertino,CA.95a14 Ph:4Q$-973-989$ Fx: 408-973-a753 � � � ` -�� `� � �� ' `,� . .. -- � "�• r � i � :i f Z i�1Y �� +: "� :rr�� ' , �_ -�f �. �- ' �►`��x� _ :� ' �-"�—•�+ `=_ � � � p��/rfr � � _ �� .� ��. �� -.� F-- f.. . 1 �-�. F~�� Y. _s A �x�� ' f „'L � �q '_�-► � '` �- - - � Lett 86 FrprrE: Maria Streeby [mailta:Maria.5tree�y[a�thecypress�otel.com] Sent: �la�day,]une 24, 2Q13�4:�2 PM To: City Coun�il Su6je�t: Support Appfe Campus 2 The Cypress Hofel and Park Pla�e Restaurant supporf the Apple 2 campus and confiinued growth in Cupertino. 1 Thank yau, Maria Streek�y Maria]C.5tree6y Direetar Qf Operatians-San Frantisca�Arizvna Generai Manager , ,. � direct:4U8-34Z-4805 niaria.�treek�yf��thc�typrr Sshntel.c.om Cnme experience aur spectacular reno�atian! � — j'' ^� �"�T� � �+ ' - � �� - � � �' f 1 ' ��`` _]� � � I] �y L� i ��. � I � � , , - � ■�� +CYPRESS Lett 87 From: Norene[mailto:nprene�s��t[.4rq] 5ent:Thursday,]une 2fl, 2fl].3 9:ii AM To: City Council CC: �Neil Struther5� Subject: Letter from Neil Struthers Impnrta�ce: High Goad moming, Attached please find a letter of support for the Apple Campus 2 project and EIR from Nei1 5truthers for distribution t❑ 1 Mayar Mahoney and the Cauncil Members. Thanks so mueh, Narene Narerte Sakazaki Santa CEara&Sar� 8enito Counties Building & Constru�tian Trades Councll 21fl2 Almaden Road, S�ite 101 San Jose, CA 95125 Phone:4�8.�65.7fi43 � Fax:4a8.265.2080 norene@schtc.orq Lett 87 cont. �u�ldi r��T��d�� S�ata �� 5�. �e��.t� ��t�e� The outstanding ❑rlcfarce ]�u��d°axx�� Cons�ru�t�o�a ri"rades Cou�.�i1 2ip2 Almadcn lioad Suite 7 pl,5an jvsc,GA 9712�-239Q•I�hnnc�08.2GS.7Ci�i3•Fax 4U8.2dS.?U8D Ncii�4.Srrurltirrs C:hiefL"-xeci�civc C1Rinr ,lune 7,2a13 �OSLiC Ci11'Cf:l Ilc�ury�ecurivc(]fT�ia•r Ro6en Qakdini k'r�sidcnt �he Honorable Mayor�rrin Mahaney As�ics�os��nrRrrs !G City af Cupertinv [�nifcrmalcers Sy9 �p�pp 7arre A�enue f3rick&Tilr; Nornc�rn CxliFurni:i Cupertino, CA 95014 C.ar��rnrers F1egi�n:e�[:o��nril Carpenc�rs 4[l7 ��; �flmments in 5upport of Appls�ampUS 2 E[R and Project C:arpr�&Li»o��um ]? Cemcnc A•tasnns�I7� L7rv�vall Laclirrs 914ti ❑ear Mr. Mayor Mahoney and Council Members: Clc�cricians 3�Z ��•;s«��'�115��«�ft h ❑n behalf af the Santa C€ara&5an Senita Counties E�uilding &Construction Trades Council and its �iax`r`S 1�?� 25,000+members who live and work ln Ca4ifomia, I am writing in suppart af the Apple Campus 2 Irnn��(�nrlccrs 377 a licatian subrnitted b A [e InC. 1.al�orcrs?7f1 p1� v �� LSUUYCY5 Gj 1�Iillmcn�r>? flne reason for our support is thaf we are satisfied the Appfe Campus 2 ProjeGt will create high- A4i��,�r;g€,rs tcr'- wage, highly skilled jobs that pay prevailing wages, Health Gare and training which is�ansistent °E'�•�'t'°n�"K'�,Ce''3 with the quaEity and standards of the eu9lding Trades. The proj��t implements the tota[redesign, P:,�n��n�s«�«c��n�=1 Er> replacemenl and re�onstruction af a�T6-acre infill site in Cupertino,California, in�luding the Painrcrs 7f1? r1�st«�rs i�u construction of over 3 rniliion square feet af sfate-of-the art building space incarparating the latest in Plua�hrrs&Sreanif�crrrs 393 green huilding technoiagy.A prpject af this scope, quality and saphisticafian demands highly skilled Ronfcrs$C�V:�crrprooFcrs 95 la�or that our California workfor�e is ready to provide. Siircc A�tesal Worlcers 10�4 Sian,L]isplay 51U Specifically, the�onstru�tion af Apple Camp�s 2 is expacted to generate hundreds of millions of Spriaklcr Fittrrs 483 �olkars in construction wages and thousands af fulltime�onstructian jobs a�er the prajec�ed 3D to 36 leamscers?87 2 manth constru�tion period. Apple and ihe guilding Trades ha�e collaborated and Apple has ,�rt�i;:,«�.�€��,: confirmed these wiU he the highest quafity univn jobs paying prevailing wages,ensuring that all Srarc I3uilding:�nd warkers recei�e a level of campensation that pr�mvtes economy-wid�sustainable e�onomf� Coziscriiccion�l�ra�fcs growth.Additional]y due to the indirect ben�;fits of this construction-related econamic acfivity, it is Council of'Califarnia likely that cai�fo�n«La�inr Qver 9,600 new jo�s are expecied t�be generated in 5anta Clara County during the cnns#ruction Fedeneion,A1=1_CIQ CaliFarnia��3h��c:.n.r.c. Period. so��i3;�y nr•i-[:�o A !e will create ane vf, if not the hest qffi�e buildin s in world and our mem�ers€aak forward to 1_ahur Cuiinril PP g #ulfilling the visian and legacy. ]n short, hecause the Apple Campus 2 Prvje�t wi[I�reate a large number of highly skilled�nion jobs that pay pre�aifing wages, all whlls�reating a facility that is unprecedented fn terms af its en�ironmentally sustainahle design,fhe Sanfa Clara&5an Benito _ , Caunties guilding&Canstru�tion Trad�s Council and its 25,�6Q+rrrembers encourage the City of _ � Cupertino ta expeditiously apprave the praject as proposed so we can�ontinue our regional and nati al e�onomic reco�ery. _��:- incer I , �r.� l �f �� '�.� G � NeilS utt�er CEQ www,scl7tc.nf'g Lett 88 �� CHAM��R�F GOMM��C� l0 Station Wa p�p¢9e Z EIR y June 20,2�13 Dac�Received Los Gatas,CA 95030 PW 408.354.9500 2013 Fax408.399.1594 JUN � q. www.los�atnschamber.cnm Mayor Orrin Mahoney � BoaZ012-�201gtors ��ty Council prneesse�bii � DianneAnderson �Up21"'�1Y10 Clty/�"�a�� . � President Discover Los Gatos 10�00 Torre Avenue Pat wo�trarn Cupertina,CA 95014 . PresldenY Elect EI Camino Hospital-Los GaCOs Gina Adams � � Gina Adarns Creative Communlcatlons De�r Il�lavor and Counci! Mernbers, Cleve DayYOn The Painting Pros � � Peggy Gibbs The Baard of Directors of the�Los Gatos Chamber of Commerce stron ! Camp&izSmart&BizSmart Global,�nc. �T�/ g°t°n"a��'S su orts the A le 2 cam us ro ect in Cu erlino. A le has roven itself as a PG&E pp pp P p ! p pp p David Hernandez global leader in technology and innnva�iqn,and with this campus wil!take a Los Gatos Auto Servlce,Inc. Rita MarcoJohn leading position for+ts entironmental and sustainable ideas and spectacular we-�e Got vo��Ba�k design. . lanice McCabe Janice McCahe Interior�esign&8uild Aatti Rice The spa-�os�atos Apple has committed to substantial in�estments to your corr�munity and it is 1 . 7revor scnwarrz ugs��nan�ra� our opinion that the economic bene�its of t�is project will spill over tn nther s�5an ste�en5 ��fi�5 in our region, It will firmly support 5ilicon Valley's status as the center of Elegant Voyages �osePn SWee�ev the technalogy industry,while creatingjobs and economic growth. � Swl eeny,Masnn,Wilson&eosomworth � Marie Tallman ` �r�c�sidn�z�'s Qur Board believes in the future success nf this project and we look forward to � � � � L � working with ynu to help it become a reality,one that wifl help us all. � �l Camino Hos�ita!�os Ga�os Sincerely, i d �5�/a � "' " w��.. ��`K....f�!r"5..�� . . Dianne Anderson, President � swe�"�y,�°S°", Los Gatos Chamber of Commerce Wilson&Aasumworth n r��oiess�o�m i��.,�como�aro� xoTNI.�1:O,a��(3ATOfi ��U�� . ' . Discover Los Gatos The Spa-Los Gatos 7p11 House Hotel Las Gatos Auto Service,InC. Oal<Meadow Dental Center Alaia Pinel Real EsYate Sereno Group Campo di Bocce Los Gatos Business Parlc,LLC 1tl 5tation Way,Las Gatos,CA 95030 40S.3S4.9300 www.losgatoschamber.com Lett 89 -----4riginal Message----- From: �anna Austin [mailto:Primadvnal[�cqinrast.net] Sent: Wednesday, 7une I9, 2013 1:@1 pM TQ: City Council Suhje�t: Glendenning Barn Ntayor Orrin hM1ahaney, Vice-f�ayor Gilhert wang, City Caun�il Mem6ers: htark Santflrv, Barry Chang, Rad 5inks The Cupertin❑ Histarical Sotiety and Apple co�laborated ❑n Ywo options f�r the Glendenning earn, whi�h was preser�atian and relocati�n off siYe �city land} ❑r preser�ation and relacation ❑n site for use on the �ampus. It cauld he a working harn among the or�hards vn the �ampus ar it can be 1 part ❑f a city proje�t. We believe Apple is �ammitted to the histaric preservation o+ the barn and we suppfl rt either aptian. Donna Austin President ❑f the Cupertino 4iistorical Societiy Lett 810 Frvm: Sam Ashknaz [mailto:sam@EDCCupertino.cam� Sent: Wednesday, ]une 12, 2013 4;34 PM To: City Cou nci! Subject: Suppart Apple Campus � We strongly support Campus 2, it is good for the regian and lacai �usinesses. 1 Sam Ashknaa ❑W,��:�•�nP��•:�tU�� ♦ � £RiFC'S � �Erik's DeliCafe 19652 Ste�ens Creek Bl�d Cupertina.CA.95fl14 Ph: 4[18-973-9898 Fx: 4D8-973-U753 �. � �_�--� � � �t �.��, �- �. ;'f�ry ,1+'•�� r"' i' ,K� � 'p� �v�L,y�� _ L� .__ r-�� ' _ .. • . ��~' . �.r� `�, � �- � 'y `�� i�� -i�� 1 � � �� ...,..,�•:.>:�. r � : �� =��'�� ._ - ��. �� _ .�.__,��,._�..� _ �}� � � � ` Lett 811 -----Original Nlessage----- From: harry jones [rnailto:t�arryjone52B@8iame.t�+ni] Sent: Wednesday, ]une 12, 2@13 11:54 AM Ta: City Coun�il 5uhje�t: 5upport Apple Campus 2 - V30HE5 SaZon V74NE5 Salon tptally supports tt�e new Apple Campus. We are enormously impressed with the design aspects and the tremendous attentian ta inpro�ing the en�iranment that the design has encompassed. The scheme is truly world �lass and is a phenomenal examp�e to all ❑ther 1 corporate entities on haw ta work with �aral Gnvernment to handle �ommercia3. growth and henefit the �ommunity in addition t❑ creatir�g extremely positi�e i.mpart an the en�ironment. Barry ]anes CEO Lett 812 From:CuperYina Chamher of Cvmmerce[ma�llo:markm=r�perrino-ch?rnl��T�rq�mniEZ�vadc03,rsgtiv.�et}On Behalf�f Cupertino Charro6er of Commerce 5ent:Wednesday,3une i2,2p13 11:14 AM To:Drrin Mahoney 5uhject:Apple Campus�Update , 'f.. -- R'� . • 11 / .f �3-.-....'S�".t � hI ��.'�� " .. '� _ �.� � . .� ;F� .'l. � �. 1 � �� `�� `4 �,,� '.�,�. ■� _2+� �.-,� ;4� ` �:4•. y .�,-�� p_ y��'��.�.. .1 . � � :t. � �L—,+�'� � r. � 1� .i � ��_. r�. ,� . °��'r�� '� '� '. �''�-., ,� � ��r_ �,�= �r ,� � �l�s. ,� r- !'�1 _��.l.`�i_ �,:°�,�, .. ��'w�IJ.r�.. � , I T �� T ��. ' f— .. •T;r ' i�'� 4�j�1'r ..� � " r� �-+ :�� ' ,�►�- � r� �':'� �* � ' ,�x:�'x;;� }q�„�•_' �,:'�' a,r'W►•. , , f � �4 .,. � �.,+'�''�� M� ,►', . � , r 'F:, ,,r '.1� :� �� :,_:= �. :�,,�,�;;, � F. � __� .1 � �' �" � � �. ''�� ''�� ,� r+� • ,.� ° ' ,. i" •�' • .�w'•{:� �r y�„�,�, �� Y yri� , r.3 r �� r il.' �� ,.�t�'�'Y .�r� � �� r� .�ly ��h' n' �'� I i` .Y- � � ��t� �; � �� V j � y. . 1 � .:. �� . �.,{ �. �� .t ?„- .. _ - A� .�.�� -' , "�.�� ,. � �..� 4.Y '.1�. � �1s��'� r, � �� cr :� F , ��'. ,� a�. .� #N •1 ` ��Y � -iy�. �� Y "l , � '2r' � r� � � �.., , ��. �'� ,• � 1]�� . }� Rl� _ rr 4' + e TiI��' ��. . ' Register Your 5uppart for Apple Campus 2! Dear Chamber Member: We are writing So update you on Apple Campus 2 and ask that you register your suppart today.Ba[h[he eoonamic and en�ironmental impaot reporEs were released iast week far Apple Campus�and the City is now accepti�g pubiic oommen[s,The Cupertino Cham6er ol Commer�e has endoised arid strongly supports Apple Campus 2 gi�en the critica]importance of Apple and Apple Campus 2 ta Cupertino and ihe 5ilican VaEley region(ram botn an innavafion and economic develapmen[perspe�tive. We ask[ha[you emall[he City ot Cupertina taday ta support Apple Gampus 2,click here. We aiso encburage you tb aftend the EIR Meeting tin June 26,2013 at 6:36 p.m.at Cammunity Hall in support of Apple Campus 2. Lett 812 cont. With appro�al of AppEe Campus 2.Cuper[ino and fhe region will be[he beneliciary of Apple s sig��licant financial inves[ment in aur�i�y. The new campus and Apple's�on[inued presence in Cuper[ino ar� ekpected!b generale: • 24,Ofl0 johs in Cup�rtino. ■ �10D Milki4n funded by Apple for roadway.tra#fic and lands�ape impro�ements,community E�enefits and one time fees to the City of C�pertir�v. • $150 Mi�iion sach year in sales for Cuperiina small businesses inoluding vur hQtels,restau�ants and retailers fram A�ple employees and suppliers. � $8.6 Billian annually in sales trom goods and services purcliased by Apple fn�m mnre[hu+�7fl0 cvmpanies in Cupertina,5unnyva}e and Santa Clara. 1 • $57 Ntiiii��i�tax re�enue ea�h year to lo�al goverr�i�en�s in 5anta c;lara Cflunty[o f�ind C011t. essential rie�ghborhvod and comm«nity servi�es. To read Apple's�conamic Irnpact on Cupertinn, click here. To review�he Apple Campus 2 en�iraninentai impact repart cliek here. �;�favriu�,+��:_�r3 CupeN�r�n Cl,amber W Go�rr�nerce �f ll rrgl�ls r�s�rved. You are receiving If,is email il you are a member nt Ihp,uper�mn Chamtmrof Gv�mnerce.11 ynu w+s��Ic ur�sutrsn�he Ur eliange yaur supsCrlptiaris,please refer ta:he Imks belew, Dur mailfng address is: GuE�ertino C��arnt,er ol Commeroe 2a455 Silverado AUeiwe Gupertino.GA 95p1� Add us la,your address Laak urisu�scril�p h��rn ihis_lisl ,i x��lc suhscn lic+n ;h�ferer�tes. . .. . • C-_ • • �---E••._.--•. Fowered 6y Lett 813 Dear Rick, Attarlied is a letter�f'support for the Apple ? Campus. Cat� yau p�ease incliEde it in the�ublic �omment 1 se�tion for tlie EIR and proje�t? Thank you� Shiloh Ballard Vi�e President, Housin� &Co�3rnuinity�e�°elopinent Silicoii Valle_y Leadersfiip GrQUp 4a8-SO1-7859 w'tt'u'.ti�l��.Or�� Celehrate 20 years af tlie Housing A�tian Coalitson �fhursday,Jun� 13th, 5:30�arn at h�adera A�aart�nents in Mauntai» View Details are fiere- http-i�hacscc.c�r�,:vn�i-��r�-in�il�d �� ACT1�M C�ALI;ION Silico:t Valiey Leadership Group ?dal Gateway Place, 5uite 141E 5an Jose,CA 95 i s� 408-5p 1-78G4 Ma's�z Ni�mber �pg-Sfl i-78G l Fax Lett �l' 813 SiLIC�N VALLEY� LEA�ERSFfIPJIJP cont. zcn+[:J�ei�ayP�ce.swr��7nJ[ June 11,2013 raaa�soi�scc F:,x r.�aa�soi�sr,i �wrw.svkj.ra'y ChRtGtJARO1N0 Mayorand Councif Plesidr�7f R CEO ear�a�cers City of Cupertina R41KEKtArICp.Ch�r+r �0300 Torre Avenue &�acade r��acUFRrr,u u��cnari Cupertino,CA 94014 Vdrrarr kL.rlK:�lSy.srrv��s TAl7WE17NER Pasf Cf�ari ��v Dear Mayor Mahoney and Councilmembers, AART p�GEUS Pasa Ch.u Sy�r�syz MICIIAELSPLINTER PaslCfWti fl�behalf of the 5ilican Valley Leadership Graup,I am writing to express our support far the np�x��d,uare�uis,mr. RoeFRrs�rrmF� development proposal far the new Apple�ampus on North Walfe Road. Sc��efarylTrc�aswcv CariH�e.•r{ Baa�dM�em6ers. The$ilicpn Valley Leadership Group,founded in I978 6y Da�id Packard of Hewlett-Paekard, �aNruaaanrs represents mvre than 375 vf Silievn Vafley's mast respected emplvyers an issues,prvgrams Welh Farga flank SkE2[YfA17Cf1AMBFAi� and eampaigns that a#fect the eeonomi�health and quality of life in 5ilicon Valley,inciuding ,ucrrKsr.r,fnf.r,�. ener trans artation,education,housin health�are,tax olicies,economic vitalit and .s,unren�r g1', P g. p Y wc�xa�er��a�.� the environment.Leadership Group members collectively pravide nearly one of every three GHEC Ut G'Kt H svsfura�crarcroup private sectorjobs in Silicon Valley and have more than$3 trillion in annual re�enue. OAVf BEi[ Inlr.rul STfVEQERG[GND The Leadership Group belie�es that�reating a climate that helps bring more high quality r°"'�'�'''�"'��""' johs to 5ilicon Valley and Cupertinv is important and Apple's proposal is nne way to further GFaRGE BtUMEN7NAL �rsirydCar+Ycmo-a,sar�aGuz that goal.This is a spe�ial proje�t for an i�oni��ompany that will ultimately�reate a unique, j�aa�aRtF �ibrant workpla�e for 10,00Q employees in the heart of Silicon Valley.Apple is a hqmegrown Pac,�ir Gas&Ek��ir cHRisenrn �ampany which has been headquartered in Cupertinv fvr v�er thirty six years.It is Ka'S`r�cv"'`a�""„ wonderful that the want ta eontinue to row here in a si nificant wa and e�ntribute to the ToRreR+�mn Y � � Y tac�t�Manm5µxe5ysrencs etonamic and cultvral�itality of Cupertinfl. nAUia ctrs�� l�irg�NrA�rn�re;e srFPNfnrafw�rr 5ilicvn Valley Leadership Group endorses projects which prvmvte transportativn flcµdrli�P.3ck,7rd Cwnp.�i.�y AaqC1�AL[INGIf 5.J alternati�es,Iowergreenhouse gas emissions,and�reate jobs.Apple's proposal to build a srNxsc�xaw�w�ry new eampus incorporates a Transportatian aemand Management program that will Iower 1I7fi9 G£G4'GC NS ,ver�r,�. the number of trips employees take.6y using this prograrr�,which features shuttle buses, RAqfIE2 GONI�LE7 �ar ool rr�atchin services,and transit subskdies for em Io ees bikin or ridin u61ic transit 2 R+nlr al Anrv rrc�a p g p Y g g p eruwxk�m to work,the proposal pramises to reduce the rate af single-o�cupancy vehicle trips at iheir �"" head uarters 6 ❑ver ten ercent. aqRe,a�qtio�zaar[� 4 Y p s,a� KfNHANNMI'FlN p�,�m�, In addition to its transportdtivn pragram Apple is i��luding en�ironmentally sustaina6le r�sRr[a��R features vn-site tv minimize greenhouse gas emissivns,reduce natural resvurce eNeahh tA,exnru�NeR consumption,and improve the quality af the site.The proposal ealls€or an increase in green �vyse r�irr,a�,jy s ace from 35 acres to 112 acres,which will he landsca ed with nati�e rasses and 6,�06 ALBERTOMAS � p g sDarosc�r��s trees.The eampus is designed to meet LEE�silver certification and will include features such JAI,49ENON as 3fl0�ehicle char in stations,a reduction of ener use b thirt ercent when com ared ISMCn.{+r��r��n g g SY Y Y P P 1(ENRACN�t�Y to typical commercial develapments,plus 650,660 square feet of salar panels and fuel cells arar Which will ravide 100%renewable ener to awer the entire�am us. LE'NPERIIFlM p gY P p ANxfofri�h�Sysfems ICIMPOLFSF r.�,Nsr�Fr�r Apple's new�ampus will prave ta be ane of t�e largest pri�ate develapments e�er 6ui4t in AtANSAt1M1?AN 5ilicon Valley and will create a weafth af newjo6s far the local e�onomy.Constru�tion on V..�7fagePcel7f CaEWa Y7rl17en Ran+secE the new campus wil!�reate 9,OO�jahs directly and could generate up ta 4,060 additional fcheknCorpwal�an �obs in 5anta Clara County.Aher the campus is�ompleted,expend9tures 6y Apple anrf the �491�C TU[L Y sa+l�ase+wa'rfxy,vF�w: 10,000 high-wage,highly skiEled employees housed on�ampus will generate 6etween R�crc�.a[�ar:r 1S q00 ta ZS,�fla additivnal ❑bs in the fvcal e�onvm K[R-7cncr� 1 Y• JEU Y(1l1K .�a�t Frarurxo dBEVs Eslabl�shed+ir79788y Apple's proposal is an innovati�e plan that�romotes alternative transportatiQn,creates an QAVI�PAC!(ARD envirQnmentally sustainable workplace,and generates thousands Qf jobs in the local eeonomy.We support this praposal and thank you for your eonsideration of our comments. 5incereEy, �,,��f.�ads..e' � Carl Guardino President&CE� Lett 814 KMVT Inter�iew with Cupertino Mayor Drrin Mahaney regarding Apple Campus 2 Praject En�iranmental Impact Repart Inter�iewer: Will the En�ironmental Impact Report on traffic affect apple projeets? I read in the newspaper this week fl�at the proposed new head�uarters will generate significant una�aidable impa�t5 inrluding exressi��e rongestipn alc�ng Interstate 28�and �mac�eptable traffic problems. ❑oes unaccepta�le mean that they �an't ha�e an Apple campus or will you accept it? Mahuney: The first thing I'm gaing to say is that 1 can't cnmment o��the En�iroiiinental Impact Report except for what I'm going to s1y �vhich is its big. Secause we're in the �ammei�t period and anytF7ii�g I say wotild ��a�e to be read intc7 the reCOrd it's an afficial tlling. The En�ironmental Impact Report c�id �ome ou#-it's about 6b0 pages. I ha�e nQt read it yet and I'�e got about 45 days to read it like e�erybody else. I took it took it to a ]unch groLip that I had the otlier�iay just to show tl�em this fl�ing and a guy said there's a CD in the back and I said oh that must be it-an electronic�ersion ❑f this-and no it's #he technical appendices which is another 3,Q�0 pages so this is 4,OQ�pages. Inter►�iewer: And yau're going tQ read e�ery word, right? 1 Mahoney: 1 will read a lot of it and we'l] get it all presented to us and t��e P1a�lning Commission will read it as well and ❑ur stafF. Dur staff has been working on this for se�eral years e�er since 5te�e announced it. Inter�iewer: When I first heard oE En��ironmental Impact Reports, I thaught in my minc� it was about whether waod ducks would be displaced or whether mare rain wo�ald happen like the en�ironment,but what kinds of things do they laok at? Mahoney: They do la�k at e�erything. I mean, literally will there be dust that's�reated when they tear down the olc� bt�ildings and bui�d it- trafFic is certainly ane of the things they laak at. The praject itself lzas a number nf- weli a lot af trees tl�at are there that are gaing ta be taken out and will be repla�ed with three times as many trees and it will be a much greener project a�erall,but e�erything in there gets shidiec�. I'll just talk about en�ironmental impact reports in general. You Iaak at all the En�ironmental impacts and then you see which impacts can be mitigated, in ❑ther wor�is, how can you da something ta mitigate t�at and there are some that may end up being where yau can't mitigate them and then you can ha�e a statement of a�erriding ron�em that says in spite of this it's o�erall a good thing. It may ha�e some really positi�e en�ironmental impacts in a praject just fram a pure enWironmental point of�iew, forget about an Lett 814 cont. economic point of�iew, Erom a pure en�ironmentaI point oE�iew a project mig�t IZa�e s❑ many benefits that it might o�erride some specific unmitigatable thing. Th�t's how it works. Inter�iewer: Is tlle new Apple UFD campus going to��appen ar is it just real soon now? Sa h�w long,ball park figure, will it be when ran they start knocking down old buildings and putting up new Qnes? Mahoney: �n ❑ur agencia now, I jt�st heard this today, �ct 1 we will ha�e a joint meeting between the Planning Commission and City Council to re�iew the En�ir�riinental Impact IZe}�orf ai�d all the comments. Tfleii it'll go through the Planning Cammission and t�en throtigll City Council. T�e earliest we �ould make a decisian wntild be late Nn�ember or De�ember of this year. It stretched c�ut a little bit from Apple's original plan as they went and did same tuning an the pr�je�t itself, but they're ob�iausly eager ta see it happen and we'lI see what h�ppens in the process. 1 Interviewer: Very famnus�ideo was the one oF Ste�e Jobs �ozniiiK tn�n�m�il and Cont. presenting the idea af the new campus. When I wat�hed it, the impressian I got was he was coming to the council and saying nice city you Fza�e here it`d be a real shame if Apple didn't build a �am�us in it. Is t��at the feeling you guys �;ot? Mahoney: It's really interesting. I taok a cat�ple of things otit oF that and since then—I got interviewed after t��at meetiiz�nn a �c�uple of thitigs ai�d pec�ple asked how I tllought he looked and I thought he looked frail I think was the term I used and since then if you read ��is biagraphy that was his last public appearanre and he was really, really ill. A couple oF things that are interesting-in the day when people can wQrk fram anywhere and they don't have to be all together—it's amazing tHat company's still think it's important for people to be together. Apple thinks it's important, Farebaok thinks it's important-they're all building these big ilew campuses. And for App1e to c�o it in Cupertin❑ where it's an expensi�e place, the land they bought was expensi�e and whate�er says First of all something ab�ut the peaple they want to attract and retain like to li�e there and like to be there and a�sa I think it is the fact that they started here I #hink there's a persanal cannectian. Lett 815 Fror►t:]am�eson, David [L�7amiesonCa�kimcorealtv.com] 5ent: 5unday, ]une a9, 2013 4:17 PNi To: Rick Kitson 5ubject: Letter in Support of Appfe II Campus -Cupertino Village LLC Rick, Attached is Cupertino Village LLC's letter in support of tfie Apple II Campus. I would fike to kindly request that the letter be pasted in the publir comment section fQr the El�t and project for the 45 day comment period. 1 Best, [7ave Da�id Jamiesnn Vice President Leasing&Rsset Management � Western Region �- � rMCo 7$5outhgate Ave�ue [ Daly City,CA 94015 a:5SD-74f-75DZ � m:fi17-97p-8$p5 Broker License tt:01904048 Lett 815 cont. May I5,2Q13 The Honorab�e�rri�Mahoney,Mayar City af Cupertin8 IQ300 Tarre Avenue Cupertino,CA 95014 RE: S�pport�For Apple Campus� �ear Mayor Mahaney and M�m�ers�#the City CaunciL• Dn hehalf a€Cupertin�Village l.LC�a subsidiary of Kimca Reafty,l am writing to expre�s ot+r support fQr the Appl�Campus Z plan, The redevelopmeni of the forrne►HP campus into a state-of-the-art researcfi� and devekopmeni�ampus for ane af the warld's Eeading corparations is exciting for the entire Cupertino cammunity. Cupertina Viklage LLC i5 the ownerJmanager of the Cupertinn Village Shopping Center located dsrectiy acrass Woife Rflad fram the new Apple Campus 2 property. WQ strongly�elieve that the investmeni Apple is making in Cupertino will ensure that Cupertino continues to�e a#hri�ing, magnificent pEa�e to live and worEc for generations to�ome. The plan itself wiil enhance ti�e immediate neigh�orhood wit�extensive roadway impro�ements 2 including safe,cannective bike and pedestrian walkway rautes to Cupertino Viflage and also to shopping districts south of Hwy Z8fl. lvzal businesses wilE flourish with err�}�loyees patronixing resta�rants and retailers wh':��wifl directly�eneft many of aur resident�us"sness vwners. Apple's investment in Appie Campus 2 and the ne�ghborhaad is a great�ompliment to�ur planned re-reinvestment and redevesopment at Cupertino ViNa�e whi�h will benef�t Cupertino resitfenis,employees and the City as weli. We and our retail tenants look forward to the Caun�iPs ap�rova4 of#he new tampus ant4 start of canstruction as soan as possit�ie. This is a once in a Iifetime appartunity for the City of Cupertino. We laok forward ta having t�e AppIQ Campus 2 as a neigt�bor and offer our su�port flf the plars. SirsCerely, � �`-�- ' _ aavi am3esors � Vice President Rssei Managemerrt Aut�oriied Agent 7S 5authgate A�enue � Daly City,CA 9R�15 g:65D-745-75�2 � m: 617-97U-SS�S Lett 816 '% ,, . i ` J _ ��/� -. � / �.: • _ -.,x=<r R. .ti,�3 �irr�a+sw�� ApRteZETR Date Received 20560 Town Center Lane cU�e�t��o, CA 95014 �UN � � ZO�3 Pretessed by //F{� r� June 7, 20�3 Mayor Orrin Mahaney City pf Cup�rtino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertinn, C�A 95014 RE: Approve N�rn� Appl� �ar�pus 2 Dear Mayor Ma�oney: As a small business owner in the City of Cupertino, I wan�ed to express my comple�e suppor� fflr Appie`s request #or a new campus. I own and operate Bitter �+ Sweet, a coffee and deser� bar in Cupertina As the hom� and headquarters ei�y to Appfe, r�sid�nts i� Cu�ertino feel a great sense of pride, The Apple Campus 2 plan is exceptional and wi�l provide annther point of distinction for the City.� A�lowir�g Apple to cantin�e to prosp�r in Cupertino through the development of th� Apple Campus 2 supports all businesses, small and large. To have Apple requesting to grow in Cupertina demonstrates what a won�erful place 1 our City is for business, I b�lieve Apple contributes substanti�lfy to all small busir�ess owr�ers in Cupertino thraugh their empl�yees, contractnrs and partn�rs. l�fith thousands of workers purchasing meals and servic�s, s�all business, lik� mine, thri�e. Many Apple �mployees firequent my coffee and des�ert bar every week. T�ey are wonderful customers - incredibly loyal and a pleasure to host in rr�y ca#e. My employ��s a�d I tr�ly en�oy our€r�quent interactions wi�h them, Cupertino is synonymous witl� Apple. Resident and local business owners wac�t ta see this project bui[t to k�ep Apple growing in the city�rh�re it was founded. I thank you for your su�part of th� project. Sincerely, � J ice �ua wne , Bitter + Swe�t Lett 817 From:Orrin Mahaney[mailta^orrinmahonev��omcast,net] Sent: Friday,]une 07,2013 1d:02 AM To:'L.A.Chung' 5ubject:RE: Reaction to the Apple Z Campus draft EIR? LA, My anly rearkion s�f�r is WQW,what a tvme.ln Fact,we are not supposed to comment on it un[il after the afFicial cnmment period cEases. Best, Orrin Frvm: L.A.Chung[mailto:lachung�a+aaich.com] 5ent:Thursday,]une Q6, 2413 3:56 PM To:Orrkn Mahoney 5uhjett:Reattion to the Apple Z Campus dra{t E�R7 Eii,Orrin; i've been jugglin�a�auple oFthin�;s and see that the draf't EIR f'or thz Apple2 rampus came otit this af'ternoon. i was wonderine i�•li�ther�au had a renction ta it?I n3a_y be hea�ily rel_yin�on an oid stary_ on Cupertina P�uch from an EIR s�opin�*izieetii��:. E see the Follo«in�had�een issi�zs,and a�n�lowin�my way throti�h the draft nnw.Am wondering if there are a�iy items that cau�ht yoiir lttention7 H�re r;i�: �r�r��r �:,F [li� I��i!iCif�iS C�! ik�:i.i�'S T°_tiIC1F!`it� 5r,ir1 i.�!�'�� 1�+JdfII 11��=Ii.E(��ij i�i tl�� =il�. ��;7r.�r+ ;fi�r.".ri1r�_: traffic] ■ CInSi�rc r�F F�r iarrr-�i�:�a� [;��i�;,�i-� . Hazardous waste rrom qemolieio� oi ti�e o�p rte4v�ett Pac�ar� �u+ld+�gs; resi�en[s sa�� tney wa��r to 1 maf!e sure there �r� nr� "�71isC �latids" that might expose neighberhoods t�� to��it I�arti�i�lates, �r•r: i.�i='/ '.V,a[it iCi lcfl[.!'.Y Ii��i.� t:,;.�ti�:? in;li� [:�:� [li:=.�]��'=.�.c"� .:i�. . r��•�r:�r_�i��r� �,r r��nrL�y [�:iEnl:o�ci:� +�.rr�i-. ■ Possible relvcation vf the Glendenning 6arn, cons��e+ed an hISLG�IC�� i��r��ir��.-y�I: • Protection af the large street trees a�ang Wolfe and Hamestead roa��=.. • t�o�se a�atement during canstruction and ❑nce th� n�w campus is in u��. • _:, .-1i1�=:_ Iv�f',:.E�:r� �I�Y iii_ii�i�:�r �` ��"��„� Il��i.l::ii: c1�:.;iE;I:ili",•�, .�i�i ��i'i:��:�=. �.�ri �C�r:� ,i I�i�Ci�:. Cordiall�•, L.A.Chung Editar,roveri�i� [.os Altos, Los Altos Hills,and Cupeitina ]c>>a 1 E��s.��atc}i��c�m G50-201-1477; ��,r��: �l,� i��+�„+� ��;�r�� .�� r!;� �+�:: �,; ,� �,.;, , ,<i��,r�:r�� v��v.��itter.�c�mllosaltospat�h Lett 818 Fram: Ryan Carrigar��mailto:ry na cCr�s3ehamher.c�m] Sent: Thursday,]une 05, 2013 2:]8 PM Ta: Rick Kitson Su6ject:S]5V Support Apple Campus Proj�ct Hi Rick, Can we ha�e our letter of suppart,pre�ivusiy sent to couneil,inciuded in the publi�commentary for the Apple EIR? 1 Please let me know if this is a problem. 7t�ank you, Ryan Ryan �arrigan Manager,Public Poiicy&External Relatinns 5an lase Silicon Valley Chamher vf CammerGe I01 W.Santa Clara St. 5an Jase,G4 95113 p:4fl8-291-5275 rva nc�a]sieh a mher.ea m si�ha mtre r.�o m Lett 818 cont. ,. ,�, =�` �� rrn �� May31.7�1� 1.'f�AAti4!I.�11 (:[)RIAI!KL I Exe�u[ive COrr+mittee �' ��.�� • Mayar Orri�Mah�ney Grac r aav�s inrelCwnwaunn Ctty COUnCII r•�,�v�.�,.:..;�� Cupertino City Hall Mi[helle P¢acock 103D0 Torre Avenue °�v'"` Cupertinn,CA 95�44 r�<<.��.�.� �,�,�•��,��: ..•.�• , • •, Sand�a WheaHer � dear Mayor Mai�vney and Cauncilmem�ers, C[scc�Sys[ems ,,;,,,,,,,,..;,•........::....�,,;,,,._:., 7he 5an Jase 5ili�on Valley Chamher of Cammerce strvngiy suppvrts Apple's 175-acre site Sea�Cun�e prbposal for its Apple�Campus in Cu pertina. Hpge ientan lOnei&RppEl ':"""'"''"� f'`�" Sifi[on Vailey is a giobal leader in job grawth,numher pf patents issued,entrepreneurship and Mary Elien 4tner Pa;4fkGa�$EIeCVic Company virtually every aspe�t of high te�h inno�ation. 8ut there's nothing permanent a6out aur region's �„�L�„d,;;,,..,:,�,,,,,.;.:. status as a gloha�leader;others are working feverishly to supplant S�licon Valley's preeminent loekhumaker pnsitian in order io attain the prasperity and superivr quality of�ife so many of aur residents take Cosmopolllan Calermg forgranted. VI.-cn,�i�•lli.:lc�r_Fi:�...��.. qene Charex KaiserPermanense The Apple 2[ampus has garnered worldwide attentian for its en�ironmentally-susta+nable Mkhaei9angs prin[iples and breatt�taking cSes3gn. Noi ieast, it is also an indelihle a4firmatioR by one of the 2 o��e warld's most transfarmati�e tamparies that 5ilicon Valley is where they want to be for 1im no�e, generafians to cnme. fl'Connor+snsp�ta� OCUgWsGfaham Apple has[ommitted Lo extensive investrnents in rpadways,intersectinn impro�ements, lockheed+Na�hn sidewalks,bike lanes and thousands of trees as part of this proje�t. The campus'e�onomi� mnathanNO61r henef'sts,direct and indirect,are incal[ulably impvrtant far the entire regian. It has heen M"'°'a'� thorpughly siudied and well thought aut. We 6elieve it is warthy of your sup�art. l�nis Schneidei R&Ilewelry&Lo�n puT organizat':on is heaviiy committed to this proje�t's su�cess,and we laok fvrward to worki�g M�ICPi�kip50� callaborati�eiy with you in the months ahead to help it be�nme a reatity. PelnnavKh Pugh&Co.,[lP r�a�ai,r�•rni�.na. SIIICE'fply, Sutanne Salata Garden Gty Consi�ur.sion �.,�.:,��,.� .�-�I..��-��f EugeneASNler.Ese� Hopklrts&Cditry,R Lav. GR�pelalion ,,_,•.,,,,:� Matthew R.Mahaad llm Lynch President and CEO San lase WaSer CompB�iy � ��,�ni.i�+��...r�i�.�i� Brian 6aer Oe+olne MdSShpW INahppd San lose S�licon Va11ey Ch a mhr�o}Cvni merce Z01 111.+. 5anta C1ara 5t. � 5aii luse?51I3 A a08-?91-52i4 � f:�108 286 `_�6I9 � s��hamGer.tom Frnm: Qrr�n hiahanev To: aDnleCam[��s? Le� SuMect: FW:RPPte aate: Tuesday,7vne 11,2013 20:12:06 AM 819 Attachments: SIiMBT C�S�{130S3ti1?$fl,RdF Fram: Peter Pau [mailto:ppau@s}�pco.�om] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1�:26 PM Ta: amahoney@cupertino.arg Su6ject: Apple SAN�I HILL PRQ�'ERTY C�MPAIVY May 29,2013 Hanarahle Orrin Matkoney Mayar City a£Cupertina 1 q3Q4 Tarre A�enue Cupertina,CA 9SA]4 R�: Sand HiI!Property Cntnpany's 5�ppnrt vf Apple Campus 2 Dear MayQr Mahaney; As yo�know,S:u►�Hi!] Property Company and its aCfifiates own and ha�e de�elaped many prajects in Cupertino,and we ha�e�een a long Earm sCa.kehalder in the cfl�nmur.ity, I a�t� se�ding you this lettcr in stxang support of t�e A�pie Cam�us 2 prvje�t. V�e have col�abarated with the Apple Campus? team to ensure that our�lans fur the Main Street de�elopment integratr with the new campus and surraunding nei�hhorhood. Appie has produced a ptau�that�inks Main 5treet to their campus,which Creates a walkabie envi.ronment for tlae residents and�isitaxs af Cupertinn, 1 The in�estment Elg�le is making in the City of Cupertino is�ttparatlelea hy any campany in the regi,on or State af Cali#'ornia. Appie's in�estment and�ommitment in nur community also stren�,�ens our abi�ity ta pxomote Main Street arid fulEill ihe Citys�ision for this�ibrant mixed use area. It is essentiai that the Apple Campus 2 proje�t ma�e forward as soon as possible as it suppurts the a�eral!c�onomy,ser�i�es for Cupertinu resi�ent5 and virtual]y e�ery husiness in the city in�c�rne way. Sand Hill Prppe�ty Company is�ery su�porti�e of Appl�'s plan and thc pvsiti�e�ffect it will ha�e on Cugertino. I urge the City�Council to approve thc praject as expeditiously as possible as prapased. I :��' , t• �' �i - � Peter i'au - 203 R�DWO[JI]Sl-fCJRES i'ARKWAY. 5L]fI'E 244•��17W��D L'ETY,CA 94[1fiS•[55U)3�14-lS�a•}'A?C(GSU)344-U652 Lett 820 Letterl0 500078 Name 5hiloh Ballard Address �Oa� Gateway PI City,State Zip San Jose,CA San Jose Email SuhJect Apple Camment �n behalf of the 5ili�on Valley Leadership Group,we whaleheartediy support the project. 1 It's a very ex�iting economic development apportunity.Thanks! Lett 821 Letter ID 500075 Name Ste�e Van ❑orn Address 1850 Warhurton Ave City,State Zip 5an#a Clara,CA 95050 Emall Ste�e.vandorn[�santaclara.org 5ubject Apple Campus 2 Comment The 5anta Clara Charr�ber of Commerce sirongly supports the Apple Campus 2 praject. This project will enabEe Apple to remain in Cupertino and 5ili�on Valley. It will also enahle Apple to add 7,40Q new high quality jobs. In�rease re�enues of local businesses and support additional job growth thraughQUt 5ilicon Valley.And enhan�e tax re�enues to the 1 City of Cupertina and other cities and public agencies. We urge and request the unanimous support of the Cupertino City Coun�il. Regards, 5te�e Van QQrn President and CEO Sania Clara Chamber af Commerce Lett 822 Fram: Megan Fluke Medeirps [mailta:megan.fluk�.medeiras[n�sierra��ub.org] Sent: Monday,]u!y�2, 2ff13 3:24 PM Tp: RiCEc Kitsan; City Cauncil Cc.Gary Latshaw; ICatj�irvi►�; Gladwyn d'5ouza; Git�De�+; L�la Tvrney; Eric Morley; Heyward Rnhin5an Subject:Sierra Club Comments an Rpple�ampus Z �ear Mr. �{ilum. Hc�naruhl�Ma}'Cl]'.iUl{j C1Ly CiTLlliill- Pleatie I ind the att�irhed c�mmen[ leti�r frc�m the Sierra Cfub L«m�i P�ieia Chap�er on the Ap�le Can��uti ?Pr��ject prc�p�74a1. We wc�uli� be ha�ny tc�ditiiut5 our rccami7ien�alic�nti rr��r thc Ph��ne«r in pertion iC ii wnuIci be hel�f'z�l f'nr 1 ynu. 7"hank vuu. MeF un Megan Fluke Medeirs�5 C�nser�atian ar3d De�elnpn�ent Maria�aer 5ierra Club Lt�n��Pricla Chapter �921 E. Bayst�ore Rc�ad. 5uile 2(]� Paln Altn,CA 9�3U� i bi�}l 39[1.8�97 f'�x [G�{ii 3�)il.�)C,f}�l nfl�ce m��l�l.11��i.m�[I�i�ntiL�'yltC[;,it1Llh.C1I'i' Lett 822 cont. ::� �; Sie��r� �'l ub L ojn a �rieta �''1�rrptex� Celehi•crtijag 8�) ti�ecr,:� nf'pr•a�ectir�g t17e plr�i�et ��R�i�l 3921 East 8ays�rore Road,5uite 244,Palo Aito,CA 943fl3 � lama.prieta.chapter@sierraclub.org C�� TELEPH�IVE:�650}39ff-84I1 � FAx:{650y 39t1-8R97 �U�y zz,�oz3 Rick Kitsvn �epartment nf Pu61i�and En�irar�mental Affairs Cupertinn City Hal� 1C13t]f]Tvrre A�enue Cupertino,CA 95014-3Z02 Re�Comments tsn Apple Campus� Proje�t Dear Mr. Kitson, The Sierra Cluk�Loma Prieta Chapter has been re�iewing the Apple Campus 2�roject since Zai2 and understands that this proposal is a signifi�ant ane forthe region.The new�ampus will redesign se�eral existing roadways within the City of Cupertino,generate more trips,and act as a new model f�r technolagy campuses e�erywhere.Far these reasons and more,we have prepared this comment letter for the City of Cupertino to re�iew and respflnd to. The 5ierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter has de�eloped guidelines for e�aluating projects�ike the Apple Campus 2 Proje�t whiGh focus Qn five key issues; 2 1. Compact bevelnpment to use�aluabEe land mQre efficiently at a ma}ar transit hu6 2. Community and Econ�mic Sene�ts ta ass�re a vibrant nelghborhaad with a sense of identity 3_ Pedestrian Priprity as the primary mqde of transpartation within the campus 4. 7ranspnrtatinn Alternati�es to pro�ide realistie options for peopEe and deerease autamvbiae usage 5. Energy�Resour�e E�[iEn[y targets far buiEdings and streets tv meet high sustainability goals Apple Campus�is using an exemplary�ammunity nutrea�h process and we applaud the responsi�eness Qf the prnjecf proponents.Additinnaliy,there are many features of the Apple Campus 2 propvsal that we are�ery supporti�e of including: 1. The pedestrian,hicyclist,and transit user benefits ineluding bi�ycle and transit a��ess imprvvements, shuttles for employees,daycare facility, bi�ycle share,car share,and other traffic demand management 3 program features. 2. The 2,500 new trees planted an cam�us-This is impartant because trees are knawn ta have many benefits ta a community in�iuding filtering the air and sail,reduce the"heat isiand e�ffect," muffle loud noises,and prv�ide fovd.'We further appreciate Apple's plan tv inciude fruit trees on site which will be used in the cafeteria. 15a�atree,http:��www.sa�atrae.com�whYtrees.html. Lett 822 cont. 3. Renewable Energy-By investtng in on�af the largest snfar powered campuses in the world,Apple is a farerunner in"green"technolagies that we hope wili be replieated.�urthermore,6y ensuring energy produ[tipn and stqrage remains an site,the transp�rtation and linkage ta an affsite sourte redu�es t�e amount of construetion ne�essary,thus reducing the amount of greenhouse gases emitted. 3 4. Nitragen Deposition Fee-We are so ha�py that Apple has ele�ted ta pay the iVitrvgen�epasitian Fee{page C011t. 257 of the DEIR}. We request that Apple identifies che fee as mitigation for a eumulati�efy significant en�ironmental impa�t.We also request that the fee he paid to 5a�ta CEara Valley Nabitat Agency.7he Agen�y st�,dies nitragen deposition as a cumulati�ely significant envirvnmental impaGt vn endangered species,whi�h the 5ierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter supports. We ha�e divided this letter intp issues A}]ple tan address and issues Cupertinp[an address.Transportatian aCCOUnts far�pprDxim2tely 5Q°�af greenh❑use gas emissivns in the Bay Area and reducing transportati�n clemand is the most signifitant appartunity fvr our�Ities ta meet Califvrnia's Glimate thange gaals,speGifically A832 and S637S, 4 TF�erefare,our primary recommendations facus on reduc�ng the transportation impacts of the prajert. We affer the fQllnwing recommendations for Apple's�onsideration: 1. lncrease mode-share split t8rget to 45%-The 5ierra Cluk�Loma Prieta Chapter recognixes Apple's stated rnode-share split Yarget af 35°/u whir.h is a solid goaf but wi�l likely be exeeeded within the first year,and therefore is an underwhelming goal to stri�e far.As 5iiicon Valley leader,it is surprising that Apple is nvt stri�ing tfl meet ar exceed camparable sites like Fa�ebook in Menlo Park�originaily stated 4Q°/a but has seer� 5 increases due t�measures)and 5tanford{S3°Io krut has als�seen increasesJ.Rather than easily exceeding a low target,we encourage Apple to do what Apple does hest and push the fimit and set a high mode-share split target to work toward. By asserting a mode-share split a6 45°/0 or e�en higher,Apple will stand out as an aggressively"green"�ompany serving as a rale model far ather companies and organizations. Z. Adopt a"TQM First"5trategy-Existing traffic demand management strategies,in general,cqnsiders TQM as a secandary mitigatian measure after vehicle capacity enhancements have heen exhausted.�evelapment af a"T�M iirst"strategy wauld re�erse this pra�tice by requir�ng applieation Qf TaM actions and performance measures hefare�onsidering�apa�ity enhan�ements including additivnal parking anc!lane expansian. Furthermore,this apprnach would minimixe the a�erall tast uf che projert suhstantiaily,an obuious bene�t to Apple. TdM measures to be implemented before expanding raad capa�ity can include,hut is not be limlted to: _, Transit tommuter benefits though a pre-tax payrnll deduttion. 6 c Free transit pass�s through VTA and Caltrain. -• Charge far parking�n site especially an nan-rainy days where there shvuld be very little excuse tq drive.The maney generated can be used for free transit passes for employees. �� Real time parking�ash aut system.If the�ammuters are affered subsidixed parking,ofFer a cash- equi�alent for those wha vpt to use alternati�e tra�ei mades.z - Bicyde�pedestrian imprnvements from neighl�orhoads with ciusters nf Apple empinyee ckusters (within walkalole ar bikeable distance}to campus. - Organite[�r pr�anpR�l DptiOnS incfuding aFfering pre€erred pari�ing for those who partici{�ate in the ca r��a n p��l. '5ierra CIu6 Lama Prieta Chapter,I�t'p.�I�Omc�nE{�.S�E�rraclul3.or�I5Ite5Id'rf2ulF/filE5�u66ISma�tP,�rl:in�White.62l7Paper.p[i�. Lett 822 cont. �� Encourage driving and parki�g nn alternate days. � Impro�e nr at least maintain existing leuel af safety far bityclists and pedestrians. In particular, N. Tantau Ave.is a well-esta�lished bicycle-friendly street for north-svuLh 6iey�le tra�el.7his shvuld he preserved.Same ideas to consider in�lude the use of safety lighYs, painted hicy�fe lanes,and undergraund or over gro�ind passageways. �.� �o not paint pre-fixed directional lanes fvr any entrance�exit that is more than 2 lanes nor exceed 6 more than 3-lanes per entrance�exit and adjust the middle land to a�eount For�hanges in flow at certain times of the day.For exam{sle,use a center 4ane as an entrance in the morning and as an exit C011t. in the e�ening. �? anly expand parking spate and autompbile tapa[ity An[e all TDM measures ha►►e been exhausted. The numher of parking spa�es is set to increase on Apple Campus Z frvm an existing 9,200 to clase to 11,p0a{page 433 of dEIR}.This will entaurage employees tv drive to wark when App1e shauld first en[vurage emplvyees ta use cammute alternatives. Having free,plentiful autpmok�ile parking dpes the exact opposite. 3. Relocate existing"protected"trees on Campus 2 instead of eliminating them-As stated an page z61 of the DEIR,the total number of trees on campus is set ta increase by 2,494.Howe�er,the plan calls far 4,5fl5 mature pratected trees to be cut dvwn due tv rvad widening and the building of the campus.Mature trees ha�e been fvund to remv�e more pollutants frorrt the air than younger trees.3 AEthough potentially mvre 7 wark to relfltate,the aestheti�and climate 6enefits are warth the investment.A core value listed in ihe Apple Campus 2 6rflchure sent out#�y Peter dppenheimer mentions increasing the number of new and rnature trees. By cutting down mature trees,Apple's actions wouid 6e in opposition wi#h that�oal. 4. Extend the reeycled water deliuery system nr cansider nnsite grey-water re-use-Given that water insecurity is likelyto be a major issue in the fut�re we urge Apple,the Cities of Cupertino and 5unny�ale,anr! other in�o��ed parties to extend the recy�led water de�i�ery system to serve this proje�t.This project shouid g serve as an example for major cflmmercial de�elopmeni noY yet served 6y alternati�e water supplies.We alsa recvmmend the cpnsideratian af onsite grey-water re-use. 5. ExpBnd riparian SethaCk to lOp fEet-A 5a foot riparian sett�aek is not sufficient.Although the esta6lished 5a-foot f�uffer is eonsidered adec�uate{from page�57 af the d�IRy, many Io�al cities within 5anta Clara County have set a 100-fnat rfparian setback pa4icy,''There is roam�n the campus site to pravide this setback and enhance the riparian�orridor.Apple can change the design to accommodate the same 6uilding 9 foatprint without encraa��ing on this recommended sethack.Apple,as a majar locai corporate ican should set an example far stream stewardship and riparian ecosystem prvtectivn. 6. Rdd an Apple stnre and�or an Apple Mussum far the cemmunity-Dne idea we kn❑w the�❑mmunity wauEd ko�e is to include a way to generate sales tax for the city hy adding a store to the new cam�us.E�en ii it is a "mini-stare",by designing it in such a way that laaks ico�ic,it will attract tourists and lacals a�ike which will 10 estak�lish a new farm of re�enue far Apple and for the City of Cupertin�.This can help the City and Apple tv continue in�esting in great infrastructure and"green"kechnologies. Mareo�er,as part af the project,Apple 3 Indiana Urban Farest Council,fit�.�v_+,vvJ_in.po��dnr�forest�ylf�leslFo-uF Aird?aners.pdf. °City of 5an Jose Envision 2040 General Pian,http:llwww.sanjose�a.govl�acumentCentFr Horne View 47a. �City of San Jase Hat�itat Plan,"Review af 5etback Faiities for Selected 5anta Clara County Jurisdictions," http:Ilwww.sanloseea.�ovldari.irnent�en[�rl�iew 1130E, Lett 822 cont. �ould work with the City of Cupertina to have a museum decficated to same of the hreakthrough produ�ts 10 that Apple has produced.5uch a museum could be lacated away fram this research faeility w�ich should remv�e�oncerns vver security at the new campus. C011t. 7. MBke the exteri0r more intere5ting fOr the put]IiC-The exterior of the facility is essentially planned ta 6e unimpro�ed.While employees and�isitors can benefit from se�era!interior"parks"and paths,there are n❑ such fa�ilities vn the exterior for residents to enjvy.While it is uncferstandable that Apple,Inc.does not want 11 the facility to 6ecome an"attraction"for residents and visitors to our region,they�ould make the exterior more presentahle to the public.For example,undulate the fence,add park i�enches,add public art,etc. We offer the following recommendations fnr the City of Cupertino's consideration: 1. Use taxes generated hy Apple for additional picyele and pedestrian impro�ements between rhe eampus I 12 and publi�transportation. 2. Ask Apple for a no net trip intrease. I 13 3. Implem�nt trdffit impdtt fees to he used toward future transportation improuements and updates in the �icinity of Campus 2.Impact fees are eharges that local go�ernments may assess an new de�elopment pr�jects.The fees reimburse at least a portivn vf the casts incurred hy Ivcal government to provide the public faci{ities needed tv serve the new develvpment.Impact fees may only be used tv fund public facilities 14 needs that are reasonably related to the new de�elopment.They may he used to pay the de�elopment's proportionate share of the�ost vf public facilities ihaY benefit the new de�elvpment;hvwe�er,impa�t fees cannot be used tv�orrect existing deficiencies in public faci€ities. 4. Implement hpu5ing impatt fees-Housing impact fees are when de�elopers pay a fee to offset the demand for afforda6le housing created as a res�lt of their deuelopment.This a�tion is be�oming mare pre�alent throughout the Bay Area.Fqr example, Mvuntain View has a$7.0 per square fopt of new de�elopment ta g❑ 15 toward new rental projects.6 8y asking Apple and other eampanies to pay a housing impact fee,it al�aws more funding for affvrdable hausing tv#�e buElt in the area. Thank you for taking the time to re�iew and�onsider our recommendations. Please�antact us if you ha�e any follow I 16 up questions a6out this comment letter. Respectfully su6mitted, Megan Fluke Medeiros,Conser�ation and be�elapment Manager Gary Latshaw,Cupertinv CovE Cities Leader Katja Irvin,Water Cvmmittee Chair Gladwyn d'Sauza,5ustaina6le Land Use Corr�mittee Chair Gita Qe�,Sustainak�fe Land Use Commit#ee Member Lola Torney,Sustainable Land Use Committee Mernber 6 Nathan Oonato-Weinstein,"San lose Explores Housing Impact Fee,Other pptions!or Affordable Housing,"SlliroR Valley BusinessJaurnal, March 11,2013,http:�/www.bixjournals.com/sanjose�news/2fl13/03�11/is-san-jose-eyeing-a-housing-impa�t-fee.html. Lett 823 From:]am�s Fawler [ni.a.ilto:jfowier��ap�le_c_o.ni] Sent: Monday,]uly 22, Z013 2:44 PM To: Rarti 5hrivastava; Piu Ghosh Cc: David �randt; aan Wh�senhunt; Foulkes Miice; Eric Morl�y; Da�id A, Gold; Miles H. Imwaile; }ennifer R. Jeffers Subject: Apple Camment Letter A�rti�in� Piu-Pcr sz�y phc�r��A;uYi,hire iti Appl�'ti�ainm�n�I�ucr un thc numbcr�I��it I.inc�Irimi AC?l[�GVLI�IL'. .�lfll I 1 7am�5 C. Fowl�r Ati.tinci�tte General Counxel -Real ES[ate Applc [nr. ! l��li nitc Lonp,M15�i-DL.A W CuP�rtirto.Calitni•ni�z 9SU1� Tel��rhnize.:rallh��ti'-C,{]l? Cell Phone:[�f18f�3Z-7R85 Email: it�,��]�ic�3�:in�lc•.��nai TN�S TRA�V5h715SIDiV MAY BF PF��VII�EGE�A�ii]MAY C�NT.a1N CONF][7ENTlAL[NFC?RMATIaN INT�NI]!�[7�NLY' FOfi TH[: PERSt)N{5}NAh'lED ABt�Vr. [F 1'Cltl Hr�VE RECEIVEl�THiS TRANSh9[5S[C7N iN ERRt7R, PLEASE Nt)TIFY h'fE 11NA7E17IAT�,LY �Y TCLEf'HC7[VE[}R RETL'Ri4 LhiAfL, ANL�D�.�.ETE��[j5 �l•IGSSAGL�AIVD AfVY ATTACI�M�.NTS[7R ENCLC]SLfRE51 FR(]M Y[7[.IR SYSTEM. Lett 823 cont. � � Juiy 22,�a13 City of Cupertino Department�f Cvmmuni�y �e�elopment i�300 Tarr�Avenue Cupertino, CA g5a14 Attn.: Aarti Shrivastava Re: Apple Campus� ❑ear Aarti: I am writing on behalf af Apple lnc.ta pra�ide a brief eamment an the ❑raft Environm�ntal fmpart Report�"�E�R"j prepared far Apple Campt�s� �"AC2"or"Praj�ct"j. Ap��e greatfy appre�iates the tremendous tfine, efFart, energy,�xpertise and good ju�gment City 5taf�has put toward the Project, including in preparing the DEIR, The Staff's eiforts ha�e resulted in a much-impr��eci Project.The D�1R is clearly writt�n, 1 t�oraugh and will assist the pub�ie in understandinq the Profect. We are ver,r gratef�l f�r the City's efforts during this proCess. cont. Appfe is �rroucl af AC�, particularly the ef�orts we have urstfertaken to mi�ir�-�i�e impa�ts to the�nvir�nment and 4ur �ursaunding neigh4�ors. 1111e be4ieve the cor�mur�ity wi�f benefit nQt anly from the si�ort and long-terr��jQbs generated by Appfe's a�ility to rerr�ain in Cupertina, 6ut a�sa from the Prpje�t itself.We loofc forward#o Appl�'s next phase of growing �ur operatians at Rpple Campus Z,and are delighted that we wili be ahle ta cc�ntinue t��ail Cvpertino our home. Whiie we support the anafysis in the ❑�IR,one issue that is�ery import�nt to operation of the�ampus i5 that the Wolfe RQacf exit indudes three left turrz lanes. llnfortunatefy,the ❑EfR cancle�des that praviding three left tum lanes would p�ter�tially treate a sigr�ifi�ant impa�t d�e to "wea�ing canflicts"anc!therefare re�ammends reducing the exit to tw❑ left 2 turn fanes. We re�ognize the City's�anc�rns, �ut we k�elieve the issues �an be appro�ariately managecf. Il4Ie r�quest the City to c�nSider�"tria4 period" s-rtiifiigat'san measure,�s des�rilaed �elaw. Lett 823 �s C017t. � �iiy nt�I1ES�fLlilp .]UIV 22. 2Q]3 Patie Tw� Wea►►ing Impacts can be Minimized The DE1R pasits that the left mast turn lane wil� have sharter queues and that som� employee5 will �se that lane,even tFsaugh their ultimate des#inatian is one af the!-�8Q an- ram�s. �hat wpuld require� merge across two lanes, patentialEy within a shart distance. Impa�t TRANS-23 i�er�tifies this "wea�ing confli�t"as a potentially�ignifcant impa�t ❑n Woife Raad and recammer�ds reducing the original prQposal from three lanes �o two. We belie�e this typp of canfli�t is unli�Cely t�occur in the first insCance and, in any event,�an be mar�aged_ Unf ike a general pu}�lic streeC,exiting the rampus wil!b��rt of a dai4y camm�ste�actern and tf�ere will be no canfusion regarding which exit lar�e to utiiize ir� orcferto aCCess the corre�t 1-28a an-ram�. As a result, most ersiployees will queue carrertly. We also nflCe that, unlike a p�bli�street, e�eryane �ea�ing will be co-workers,which �Ne belie�e wili moderate aggressi�e driving f�ehavior. In additian,the issue car� be further minimizetf k�y t�e foflowing measures: • Instal�ir�g cRear signage through�ut t�e exit ap�raa�h, including overhead signs, 3 painted directions orr lanes and appropriate lane striping • Infiernal emplayee edu�ation • TrafFi�monitars We prapa�e Che City allavv the ProjecC ta open with three lanes, subjett ta a nine-month monitoring period. This manitaring could !�e ccrndu�ted i�y an independent obser�er,at Apple's expense. The ohs�r�er would assess and document the extent of weaving during the peak PM period. If aft�r this initial periad it appears weaving is in fact an isse�e, the�iry co�ld require the elimination af one IefC turn fane. If the third I�ne remains open,the City �o�ald retain its discretion ta close a lane at a iater�ate, if issues arise. Apple belie�es this approach not anly eliminat�s any poter�tially 5ignificant impacts, but is alsa fair_ As it stands,the D�lR a55umes the wor�t w+ll happer�. We propose a middle ground that allQws us to demonstrate weav+ng will nflt be a prablem. If we are wrong the City has a remedy. T�is bath mitigates the im�act and a��mmodates A��3e's operational ne��s. ❑peratiana� fm�a�ts to SouihE�oUnd Traffit an Woffe Road We appreciate the City endeavored to under�tanci and review the patential aperational impact5 of tw4 exit lanes vs.three exit fanes. 7he DEIR toak an innovaCi�e a{apra�ch and we finci the analysis in Tab1e V.I-14 infarmative. We aisa appreciate ihat the City 4 re�agnized bnt#� aptians have their awr� impa�ts. In our�iew,the mo5t me�ningful data point is the difFerence in travel time, and we note thar an increased trav�l time of 55 se�vnds for sauthbflund traff+�an Wa�fe i�oad ta tsavel neaY4y ha4f a mi4e is r�at a Lett 823 cont. � � City af Cupertino .luly 22,?q�3 Pa�e Tt�ree signifi�ant impact. We apprec�ate that Impact TRAhlS-�3 only identified "weaWing"impacrs 4 and did not identify a de�ay-related impact on Wal�e Rvad. cont. The exit con�iguration is something that will a�Fect emplayees vn a daily b�sis far many years, so it is important we get this issue right. As always,we appreciate your 5 �onsideration af our�an��rns and antitipate tliat we tan wqrk to final resolut��n on thi5 issue. Sin�erely, "��??�,u��:•.� .a. r�"r Dan Whisenhur�t 5eniar�irector Rp�fe Inc. Lett C1 Fram: Tappan Merrick[rziailt��:ta��merrick��yal�oo.coml Sent:5unday,]ufy 21,��13 9:05 PM To:Ciry Coun[il Cc:cnun�ilra�c+.sunflyVal�..ce.us; Birdl�ndNeiqlibryrs@yal�voq+-au�as.C�m; Raynor Neighbors 5u6ject:Cupertino Viliage parking lot exits Dear Muvor�inc] Hrnic�r�ihle Council. t]ne of't�ar 5unny�ale n�i�hbor�.�pproache�l nu thi�everiir��in regard�ta h�aff i� I1n4v in and aut«f Ctip�rtino Vill;zet {sau�h��eti�carne.r af Wullz anci 1-lam�tit�;�d). H�li��;�lirectly w•eti�af�hi5 tihogpin�rznt�.r,a:� Linn��Uri�e in 5unny4•ale. He r��n��c�e� me l�t.cautie h�is awa�� hat 1 am riinnin� f'or Sunnyvale'ti�i�y Council. 5ea�3,ii�our Nn�embi.r,2(1]3�Ic�•tion�arul hav�t�ccn a Ic�n�,tiitie.n�i�hhc�rh�sn�l ar�sJ city �zrlivisl. Ati we�iti�tititic� �liiti exp�tattiinn c�l'lhiti�hc��r��in��cn�cr. 1 h��ai�t�f iiiic�e.rti�anci many ul�hi,.�nd�hi�wm.ill nei�l}bnrhond'r E3rc,hlen�ti,bccau,c. I tcu�, ynmeiiri3eti ti�iun�here. Ati 4va��xpla'sned ln me,the i?{lU rir two x�nry p�ri.i��=lai ta b�buii�alcmg the�v��tii�e�f'�he property,an� a15n �loit��Linn�l.��ill cJu�n�� lraft7c direetly c»t unln I•l��inetil<<�d Roa�l,only. This is�i nc�it-riie�crcti exit��hieh aiready iz�1� pra�ilemti wii�i exi�iri�l:tll'ti.�l�ll'lIV�7��Fllltii:[YkL'.CL'iti ii�a�leyua�e Ia37c m.irkin��n a��«i�ii�fudal�imlh lef�and ri�h�harid turnx. Runsiin�7 111 [�I�lllc:s�Cxtra C�r��]uL tltiti�]ne exil will crc�ile all tisirlw t�f�[rn��uing p3oblem�.�Spc�s�lly rrncc the ApPIc 1[�am�us iti b��ill and nccu��ied. � A betrer��ini�� ti•[�u€d b�tn Cunnci all thc��ark�d c,�rti out the metered F'rwlcridge exil intiteud.makin� it niuch ca5i�r tu�Cl L':Jtil,11UI�[�"I an�l tir.�ullt,ati��cll a5 tr�velin�� u� tn W'alls anc] hca�finrr wetil an th� l�fl tui7t li�fttti dctii«n�ci Fr�r Sa�:h 1 :1C11�11. ` ` Ann�her problem�xi��,a��[erc�n, �vhn�e titc,��li�*ht is ne�w�iiana�ed by Ctiper�ino, in5tead ol�5uniiyvale. W'e�� hc�tyd Hoii�etitead tral'�c �a�ili need a Inn_er�•:�h� �urn lane. Ncir�th and we�t bouncl traFr'ir cnmin�up al�zn��Nernn i�iay need adcii�i�fnal �in�inn��n� �urn lane c�pti�i=�� for hum�c�wn�r��n be ahl� �u quirkly�et�o�.•ork in thz marninp�. W'ith al! ❑i' the extra ir�2f1'i�alni3w Ht�metiteacl a��i re�ull of halh fl�e Ap�le as�d Cupertino Village carti, exiting�virli a!e1't turi��i uf' Linnet will pruhanly n� irnpc,��iblc. �3��iitin cit�vlti�[I 3T1�[I7al lhitii 5uilnyval� iieighbnrti, irwny�vitlzin 3{]U I'ee�oC tlie�r.irkiti�ti�ructur�t� L�e hiiil�, wcre ne�ee natif'ied ni'any nt'the meelingti und nei�_hhnr�fuir�:ach ��rogramti that:sre ty�icui.an�1 utivallV required t�f suih C4'L'[3[ti, I �vnuld ent�rura,�Curer�inc� [i�hc.«in a nci�,hhnrhi�c�cJ�su�rcach prc�era�n rc�ardin«thiti prnject.�n� in c�znjunc�iun with �he Ap�le II Camputi, rea�h ��etter tic�luti�m thai�the uiz�:�p�rnvecl,app:�s-�sitly. in ?f1Ut�. Yuur�it�enlion to�hiti m;�tler iti de�ply ap�?recialerJ hy uti Sunr3y��ale re5identti. Re�pectl'{�Ily submitte�l. T,y��Men•ic�: Tap Merric k f'«r Cnuncil ?i]13 Se:�t 3 I��:Il�.a�t�a.l�i}��i��rri�F:f i�rtiEiit n��il�.��r�_I 1 f]91 Firth Court, 5unnyvale.CA 94U87 FPPC# 13555G5 4U8-?49-290[] Lett C2 Fram: Ronald Maare[mailta'ronaidml2a@aol.[om] 5ent:SUnday,]uly 21,2013 11:42 PNE To:Ciry Council 5u6ject:APPLE CAMPlJS 2 CQI++IMEN75 I SiJRP�RT THE APP�E CAMPL�S 2 FQR THE FpLLOWING REASUNS: I heartily support ihe approval of Apple's Applicatian to huild Apple Campus 2 in Cupertino. I think it will 4e penef{�ia�,a�d will heip Cupertina to�e mflre prospernus. When Ste�e Jobs appeared at the Cupert�rlo Gi[y Caun�i�meetmg an June 7,20i�.[o announce nis pr4pasal,a waman in the audien�e made some negative remarks abau[it.and Mr.J�bs responded "bp you want me to move my h�adquar�ars to anather Cily�[Mountain View7"Any City wo�1d gladiy welcome Apple ta�acate Cupertinp and Incate in their City.Fqr example Sunnriaie,esAecially,is Gckinq it's�hops. Please dan't iet�nat ha��en.Kaep Ap�ie here,in the City where F�all beqan. There will afways be 1Vaysayers,Philistines,{philistine-a person who is hosliie or indifferen[to�ul[ure and the aris,flr wh❑ has nv understanding of them:a definition fram a dictifl��ry�,and Peaple wha simply make up statisSi�s,ar project unfQUnded facts abflut[raffic,etc_Qon't let them drive Rpple flut of Cuperlinfl.it is likefy that conso4idating many of Apple's buildings scat[ered in Cupertinv,Sunnyvale. Santa Cfara.etc.into qne area with an on-sire parking lat will hefp alleviate some!*alii�prabaems in nearby Cities. CUPERTl1VD HAS SDME UNIQUE C7PP�RTIJNlTi�5 First of all,Cupertina has ihe documented rig�t to clairn 10 be ihe"Sirthpla�e of the Pe�sana4 Computer Industry."Ap�ie Computer was started an Aprii 1,1975.by Sleve Wozniak and 5teve Johs.and in�orporated hy th�m an January 3.1977 in Cupert�r,o.+�:�iif�rni�. Appie's"Apple 2"earnputer was the firsi truly"Personal Computer."Alsn it was not a"ki[",as many varibus pre�ious a►tempts were{inciuding Appaa's irrno�aii�e app�e �"),thai had to be assembied and programr�ed,et�.7he �Apple 2" was tne first persanai eomputer,cnmplete aus-ot�he-bvx and ready ta ga. �t was aiso the rirst to�ame in a piasti�;�ase and ta include calor graphics,The"Apple 2"was(anrJ s�ill is)an impressi�e ma�l�ine. I still have mine.I hsve a1 leasi 10 App1e Computers and many other Apple peripherals and produ�ts,like my App4e Graphic Tai�let,an which i did rhree drawings {Illustralivns"y ai home for SRI.I was told by ihe Edilors.I#iey were li�e"first"conzputer 11lustr_ations eyerpublished.and thay were in a repan�y SRrs"Lang Range Planning 5ervi�e." 5ecand,Appie is tamous wQrl�-wide because of the 5te�es we adore,who are reguiarly known as"7he 8ays from 1 Cupertino"in the news.baoks.and ati�er references.Sa.�ur"LiFtle Cupertino"is alsa becoming known wqrld-wide as a Landm ark. Third,Apple is Cupertinp's larges[spu�ce�f retail tax revenue fvr Cupertino.Let's fzppe Apple,Inc.�emains here. Besides hoping,let's da a!I ihat we can[o en�ourage App1e lo continue ta iceep it's NeadguaRers here in Cupertino,if's ariginal Nomeland. Now,ahQUt�raffi�.Appls already occupies mas[of the buildings in Cupertino a�d is spilling a�er�nto near�y cities.It is reasanat�{e to assume that Apple will consolidate the sr.attered emp{c�yees into the new Campus,and some Traftic will pnly change places and w+ll not increase. However Cupert+no,like afl cities needs Traffic(balh[ypes]ta support the ather businesses that it hosts+n Cupertina,[a keep them profilable viahle,and staying open,for addilianal cily relail tax reven�e.New emplQyees wilf likefy join 1he patronizers of Cupertino's ather businesses.on lunch hours and after work.We Cupertina's residen[s all need to supporE all Qf Cupertino's husinesses.We also want ather people to corr�e and shop in Cupe�tina.It would be faolhardy tv disCaurage the traffi�ai pevple coming to Cupertino ta shap! Speaking about supponing Cupertinci s businesses,i hope tor a new 5tare.Rs a sharehflider.as a shareha�der's meef�ng.� once asked N1r.Ja�s:"Why don'!we have an Apple Store in Cuperlina?"He replied;"#get a lok a1 requests fpr stores.I dpn't ihink ane here wauld get mu�h Tratfic"(Hpwever,in this�ase,what he was referring to is a marketing lerm�"Traffic"meaning �ustomers whv gp into stares,and not to r�ad lratfic,Fie thpughE El�at rsvt many pevple woulcf act�alfy visil an Apple s[ore in Cupertir�o.}Sesides my Apple I!,as I have said I have fo�rleen Macintoshes. I knaw there is a company sfare on App1e Campus 1,but vou can't buv Aoo1e Fkardware there;in fact you�an't buy Rpple hardware anywhere in Cuperlino.We need Appfe's Real °Fiagship 5tore"ta be here in Cupertina.i am happy to li�e in Cupertina and i wouid enjoy shepping at an App�e store here,!t is annoying ta ha�a la ga to App�e stQres in other cities.I'm sure I'm not�he only person i�Cupertino who would go intv an Apple store hare. Lett C2 cont. When Mr,Jo�s announced f�is p�ans for Apple Campus 2 a!the Cupenino City Gouncil,he said:"Many peopfe w+ll come iram ali aver Ihe warid lo loak at this new auilding,espeaially Archifects and Architectural sEudents and Touris�s"That is potentia�ly the"Gnod"TraHiC Ihat Mr.Jot�s said was needed lh3t Cpukd be fiEling a Glar�au5 I+tew Apple Stqre in Cupertinp either in t�e Spectacular f�ew Apple Campus P,or in an Aooke"Loao"5haped Store.as viewed{rom ihe air.with�lasses and otMer evenSs in ihe in�he righi ieaning"leaf."That store�oulr!be lo�ated in the prapased Main 5ireet Project nearby,and cauld al4ay any Apple �vn�erns far privacy.But if flu�many wish�s are danied and there is no hope evcr for an Appl�store here.and Cupertino remains as Apple's Orphan,tlien imagine thnse hundreds,or maybe thousands af�isitor's dismay.disappainfinent and then bewifdered looks wqn[lering"Why is it that there is na Appfe Stnre here,qr a�en ne2r6y?",and fpr them t4�eam that they wAUld ha�e t�[ra�el aboUi six mifes away[0 Ihe dinky Apple sta�e at Valfey Fair shappinq m8fl Qn the barder between 5ant2 Clara and San,]ase, California. fsn'�that incredibly ironic and dum6?Came on!Apple.Lel us�uy Apples here in your Apple�rchard.O}(,your Apricol Orc{�ard,it yau say sv.We need yo�tr truiy"Flapshiv S�ore"her�in Gupertina,nat in some ath�r City. I warked at Stanford fiesearch Institute{5RI}in Menla Park lor thirly seven years(�955-t992j as a Creat�ve Anist.In the IaSe 1964's.�in my awn late Thirties�,I was Creating a Grapt�i�,for ane SRi�ompuier 5cieniist.thaf was shawing a 8ubb�e Chart illusirating haw much memory would be needed try mainframe camputers in the future.I iemarked that "I could hardiy wait t❑ hav�one"He ask�d:hlava what?"I repiied:"A Camputar!"He laaked a1 me and said:"Yau want a Computer qn ynur Oesk?'I said 'Yes"He said;"IVot in yvur�ifetime!"7hat Camputer 5cientist was alsv��med 5te�e. 1 5a.I Thank yqu,5te�e Worniak and Steve Jobs,tar bringir�g ta me wha#I wisnRd far in my rhirties,your excellen� "Computers on my Desk"in m.y Eitetirne,since i 9T7!I wiU cflntinue ta buy more Appfe products,now in my early Eighties and C011t. more,God willing! CUPERTINp,ppN'T MAKE A TERRIBLE MlSTAKE. ALLDW APPLE CAMPUS 2. Cuperti�o.don'[miss the opporEunity Io capitalize on your illustrious history as"The Birthplace o#The Personal Computer Indus[ry,and the Home oi Apple,Inc."We aiso nead S!a[ues of the�wo 5teves StEVe Jabs and Steve Wa2niak["Tlie Woz"]by !he excelient sculptor who did the wo�derful sta[ues of the two iVavy 5eals in Memvrial Rark.Thase iVew 5tatues should pe located in the"Nfain 5treet"prflject and located near a n�w Aaale Museum,and a new Cuo�rtina Histary Museum�alsa hausing Ehe Ghamber of Commerce,my sugges�ion made a![I�e Sandhill series].borh io be I�oused in a Waoden Bui4ding,as oppased[o ath�r itraterial.W�wanted a w2rm feeling.as w�CitizBns specific8liy�,sked fqr in Ihe[hree Sandhill"Main StraeP"meelings!]y graups of�o]unteer citizens se�eral years aga.{Please look at the en[ire specifica�ions on ihe chafls and notalions ot thflse meetings.} Isn't there a Cupertino Chamber of Cflmmerce here?I ihought so!i ne�er hear anything a�ouY 1hem.What da they do7 Ii there is one I hape that t}1ey suppon Apple Campus 2.Ah!I saw in the�omments that the C�C does suppart Apple Campus 2. Good for youl 7v all pf�hase in�plved:Please,dan't delay APPLE'S CAMPLJS 2 prvj�c[any Inng�r.Th�costs ai kapvr,Materials,and many other efements coniinue[o rise daily. Again,I�on't delay!Lei the gvad times rflll fln! 5ineereEy Sudmitted,f�r the Gnod p!Cupertina Mr.Ronald Jaseph Moa�e.Sr. Cupenina.CA 950t4-2318 1-408-253-1197 rc)n�ldr�i 1=a��z�?r]I.i:[�ni Lett C3 FrOm: Iicith�dl5?7+n�aof.Cam �n�ailLo_Keithddl_S27�a�aol._�om] Sent:Thursday,July 1$, �Q13 �.:z3 PM To:City Council CC: Aarti Shri�asta�a;�ity Clerk; 5ti�pets��vdlieywater.orq 5uhject: New ronstruction in rear of Apple parking lot,adjacent ta Cala�azas Creek July t8,2Qi3 Dear City Gauncil and Community�eveiopme�t Dire�tar, Can yvu please supply the fvliawing Apple projec[appli�ation Na.,describe the public hearings that were schecfuled regarding that applicaiions re�iew and then the permit number that ailowed the co�siru�tiQn shawn a[��435 Narth Tantau Ave.,in Cupertino? Was this perhaps a Community Develapment gire�tor's special administrative approval? Was this new Construction apprp�ed as part vf a new development agreernent with Apple? Please direct me to ihe dt�cumentatian cn�ering the approval pracess doGUments for thfs project and could yau alsQ direct me ta any Santa Clara Valley Water Distri�t permits or approvals-which cleariy show�oth Clty o#Cupertir�o-and- SCVWO's set baCks and easements were follpwed. 1 Were special excepEians granied to Apple to disregarc7 any af these easements and set backs? Whp is the S�r�ta Clar�V�Iley W�ter distr�Cf perm�tting Cont�Ct for this speCitic pra]eCt.it is Sue Tippets perh3ps.pr? As the Dld vffiCe structure at this address, 10A35 Narth Tantau Ave,is slated far demnlitian as part vF the new Appfe Campus 2 prajecf.currently that applicatian is at the EIR stag�,why wasn't this new cans[ructian seen as requiring adequate pubiic no[icing,publlc hearings,Fa aifow EIR mitigation impacts for the future deveivpment af a new city park andlor a�reek riparian irial andlor a seasanal park in the SCVWO�orridor where Calabazas Creek iies adjac�nt[a this new constructian? GQOgIe maps shows Ehat in early part ot 2cri 3: na de�eiopment ar construction was seen in Apple's rear parking lot, adjacent fo Calabazas Creek and Tantau over pass: Lett C3 cont. t� - _ - �. .-. _ ... , . _. w... ,.. -. �. : ,... ........ �..,.... ..., �....._.. . r-r-------,'�� . �., :rc.. .. ��,-,�.- -;�,,.- ... . ..... ....�..�-.,.�.:_ -- i.�:i. . •�- ��tJ Ly�i 10435 tipr'h Tan;d4A':Bn�2.Cupertrn0 CA ,�� -� �. i s=s /j:/�� .� _Y� ,� �``f rF•�� y +I ♦r � � '�A:� \ } �l . ] �� ' _ ��7' "�r��l� � �' ~ ^ �r� ' .. �� , .- a � � � �'�r•. y '- ' * �� 7 � � '�. � � �- �� ry�� # • f'. �l� ' �� 7 �=;� �' �yz. �� .✓hG;i,... , `� ��v.e`7.:,% ` � ^'�/ 3�- �d.� � ~ � �e�5r�yi.x.a• :s.b . [��x. _. ns seen�orm kann s�ce or ianta�br�cgc:cc.ng wc��.:arae mncrete m�ni story svucwre can be seen � � :C'. T X::.:;�r��sy�•.�. +Yi�1C�.� �. yii.. . .� �.;q�. ['�n. � ; ��ai�._ � i'�'� . �"j�.�+i � '�'� � . :•':��',.�q�4y �� i_ 'y ��:�:�, 1 w .1} �, i"7 + �Rf?� �n'�.�Y � .��'�1 •1�� .F,�{ " ;'. 11�a•`,' i',. 'j, 1"1.'-� .-S� '��'1. l�C��''ryllh �:�} •+Y -.��..� � ��; _•�:��•'.��: , �;f'��c . ,E;„-�� :• ,,;._ �:;,' ., , ��,,1�� 'f� � �;;�, -_F �;� < �. �., f-., r�<.:-,��; -� r1?' �_• �lu ��•., ,4- „s. `� � . :S,:v 'I .i.`�d ,l S � .x ; �Ny�'�.'�-.� • -:�..�-..�, ' ' L•_,..' �[a�� . •;4�' �`rdl.� - 'S• ,�.��^ h�-'.' :L. w� . �� . •� - + �A�� .�� . �L''�°„'' 'l. 1 f' ��': .f. Y•y.�� .Z�.�S':�!• •:''.`.�'•Myl��:�• [�'�P.� i' �" ��"}��'.-" ��'�• -n�a. ��.�.'{?I.� '.�i._.._� ' " •'Sx 7�'.'�tl r y :�"{. ''-y5�., � IC'"Tr::'. '. '-, ' � A� ' L�'r_ {.�r'a'.:.:.a.•-..TyT`�,:' %k � �y'��. ' i�: •'� 3,'r_ �•� i%y-' . [� 4±:. J•.. .� _. ��• �'� �',_ .��!.��,. =:;a: .. �,i� , "Y�. . ..�;: •�+i.?'.._.t'Sw.. . n; rs . ,� 4.�r':'"��[�;_�"%��:'l�1:�,1��.._ �.:.ry;,i;.• � •',3°-� • 'r r-�: .:R..: yEl�� .-v*� o.. .�. �� .:L? '� i`." y_�5.�..F.{�.�• •�ti.-I�=.LC;;`.�. • 'f- � �� ., � ' -' ,.,'�-.. � .. . ��_.. .•k: ��r.�7' . +�•:,",�.•'.1i��i°L'.�-. ��•. i.?��i� �'��•�n�"'.��j`y�'•,�.. ..;`,�ti:�:.�' :�: _r" - .7:��1�-;S e.- r�-. �.. �'.�':,.•. �s; �^•, !r� . _ r.• _•.�<. 4 • . ..- - y 77_�.. ;;�� ;C: ` °'�,ri,' ._sY� ,�I; �•.' �{-,.' .�..�'=-1�� ;�� ;•:.. �.. �.:_ '=r�'+�:-:�s• ' rry- -k},. �+c:' "4t �' •'-3.:K Z : .�' x,'/7, ,�{ r,i� .�•_.�.�.�.::: � �''''�._ '�• '�= ,,y�� LS'�-r��t�,� :,-�,�.: �,�y(.� k.: t^��F�;'.•�. �`: ,1:;...,y; ` �"''.. ;`S��'' l,�>;`ry:r: -:rr.;:, . ira:,. �-.c �� r� '�`� • �C' �}�s Y•' '�F`' • � . .�•Y.-:��':.. '�.�. . �l ` . :�%�.i>•,' f:' ��. °� � ...�1 ._�,. ':� .- Cr_ l=:`- ��;�{�:�.. ,r�..' 'a5.:'?�u,: `.7e��."�i; ,V`�:r�.�.�:: . �•.7Wk;,��-:,�' :'" }Y:F i i`I!:�'�" �y �. ':�.';,�: ,�:%•. . :�y - :.� y :�. `�-'��, :;k;r:: ' �� l:u; ti;:��`��; ,. •. r � .::_ ��`�`'�f'-i�.a:m ,.?R�;� . '� •��a �',.. ' �� !--:-j � �' x. G'�� 'S�Y�' �f:•: 5� � . •i�',*'��': �.F..j�r ••. ' �J�: - a.F il::..: '�='.'•'•,�` -��j�..fir'fi;�q r� Y'. ' �t's .�'�"ci�.��'"��r. ' "8.:�,'. - �,�. � �+i�.L"1 s'..:1..r. .-:ti'�:''rf,r.;i. 1:;� , •.��j- ::.+.7 ��i.S��J��':F �!� _:.�'yw'!�4•.�.� !{�*�_�l�}`!'^., i � � :1-v�." y�!.',iy:Q. �,�c .. t�_ ..• .`rL'i � �'!.y i•� '�' � ii1� _3 .�. .{:�..'t. . ._ �.•• .��.. �i: •i:s.��l�'Y�',,"'.,'_�iC';`�;�;.a•:.��'- '}':.- .:��•, :�"i s_�.,•:�,�'�,�;-_ ��f-:;''�:.a.?�'�.,�,-',:¢ �� -- - - } � - � �.'-`T.. �:^�. '�S''. s�i �'.. �;rc�:•.. H ,�• �1�'i .yY: '�.=:�?.�•._ '�'.�.F'r'',y ��, :;.::_�'3' :�.<< '� �.; �. �,�,�r,,. w s - - � , ;:s &•.Y �:� �. ��• �. ,....• ,�;.: i �,•ri.l�! ' � � x�� e�;-a�' �C.=:!.��. ;�',.°.. . - ��` � �:. -Yi_' Y�� •� � .� �i��.�F"i.{.J�t: T Iy v'� .� `p \''•.�'--'"��y� ��Y..:. _. . '•. - -__ 1+...o� .i�. .'�'y r'S't.c�''`:�t i1K �L�. j y��/• �, �Ri ^"�-T . `'.�� '�`C �� r."." - �f'�� ;w�a,-:�y- ' .S3y.,�g,. •i.�1 _;.�4�, �y ;]�S;'�,"!lF,±��"�`:' ;:�.? .�.Fi. ,�i . �'� .,y �-5�� ` L"i;�::- . '�p:�..... ��-. :;., `� ,�-�� +�'�.• . .,�;�� ,., � � �-' t� �¢'.�� " . . ��r:�'�� '��i'.r1<; ,'w ..�'.' .P,.•• �.j :. y'f..'�• -�:"._� - � " ~� � "�AYY`,:. r 4`;rY� �-�:. J�' }'• " ..a , .Y .J� ��.- ' C.iF. _•'' m ;�{' "�. zL' . _ _ ••[� +�' '��.�`l.','.eS�r9q:• .r.�i,; � .u..... S•.Nr Q, ,�a• .-:'; �...,->,.__i � �y �� ar•� .� S'..�. 'r�, .wF��L!F.k/ �•..�: !p 1 'r .� x.,ii�"e�„'(�,'��j!l. -' ,��' . �.�1.'� �:�`.�.+.,:�_�,,,4i,...YF �r� - � x� _- � " - •�•'P ��"r - � �� .•'-� ,`r _s== � ;.��°�• =v . �.... _ .__ .�S. �, �, � ,� �. _ _ f�-•:,,;?5�i.;:",'�:� �:�' �� '�'� i d - .'� ��:r' !+- i f � ='� �r k��' _�1r•�, L� ;�.. .'y�,� •?t,a�,.. �.•�a � "''�� /�+ y � � . . .�� .'.�t' �r _.. -+w '�' •�� : ' . .,.�ff'�� _ '�� ' �I IA+�1�� 1 . ' �r ��:•� �TA�.. wi..'�Y�,��i'�f� . �fi• L . ] 5 y� � .�'}• �� •�`�' t r'M1 _ _ ��i��Lq'�,�'�- :7r `�,�..�1��-�_�t:#y��. . �G?1�i 1•:' ix •4 _y�, 5-��/• . :4 ��.:p.�. ._ � , . ., �"� �'��' ' _ .. � . ..'-� A ' y •• ;::":.z.'.;;' '�: F r;�;, � ++ i.. "�iH'.i�4;'.� ?. �: r ''-��:�.y_ �: � r• .N�'t 7 '.�..'-ti" . �r . •tr�."��' � ��.� ' � _ -� � . � ' } . �. - ,'q;�'A-^�..,�y_ ,• - , S4 � ..-_ �*�L^�� z�� - '�� { . '� p. � ,'.'.=r �w i= 1 I 3��„'�.a•r-r" ��:�4:. ��l� �� _ �, :�r.�i��,� �, ..��` � . ..� . Lett C4 From: Gary Beaupre [mailto:garybeaupre@�omcast.net] Sent: Monday, July J.5, 2013 6:32 PM To: City Cauntil Subject: Apple 2 Campus Dear CLipertina City Council Me»Zbers, I attetaded the July 9i�' Sunny�ale Cau�cil Chaanber rneeti�� to hear the report on the Apple 2 Cainpus DEIR. I was �ery disappainted that there was no expli�it disc�issian of wliat I cansider ta be t11e most basic af questions ahaut t11e Apple 2 Ca�npus praje�t, whicl� is: Is t11e project simply taa big far the target [ocation? The draft ElR talks about sa�ne impacts that are "significailt", "una�oidable" $I3C� "[I77T C7I]I3d[t7E [Ill[lf?1teCI t0 7 1E55-ttl8Il-S1�T[11�1C7IlT ICV@I 1 with feasible ir�iti�ation measures". That statement clearly i�ldicates t11at there will he a negati�e impact a�1d there is e�ery reason ta belie�e that certain 5u�iny�aie residents [i3�ostiy Birdlar�d �-eside�lts) will ha�e to live witll those n��ati�e impacts for as lori� �s they li��e i�l Sunny�ale. As a 24-year resident of Birdland in Sui�ny�ale, one of the things I ha�e �o�ne to ��lue tremendously ahout wllere 1 li�=e is tile character of my nei�hbarhood, and spe�ifically �ny alaility to quickly access the carpool lane on Hi�t�way 28� and be at Sat� ]ose airpart or parked in 5an Jose downtown tQ attend a play at the Rep or to ga to the apera. Presently, 2 those trips typically take me no lon��er than 15 tQ 25 �ninutes, e�en at b�isy canlmute titnes. I �an only ima�ine hvw addin� se�eral thousand cars frorn the Apple Z Campiis to the Wolff128� and LawrencelZB� an and off-ramps will make those trips int❑ Sa�� Jose feel like a traffi� can�estian �iightmare. Appendix B, Traffic Impact A�ialysis of tlie draFt EIA has an assessment of the cLirrent cammute time traffic sitiiations as �arioi�s locatians. For example, it states: "In the PM peak periad, tl�e q�iei�e from t11e ramp meter extei�ded back six to se�en cars onta Wolfe Road." If 3 a traffic analysis su�gests tl�at tk�at que�iing is not �oin� ta become absolLitely horreifd�us with the additiat� af se�eral tl�oiisands more cars from Apple 2 tryin� t❑ access Highway 280 at Wolff Road, tlien tl�at sug�ests to me the traffic analysis is fundanlentally flawed. ln iny opinian, the Apple Z Campus buildin� is too tall of a buildin� [How maEly Birdland resider�ts know tllat the rop of tlle buildin� will be 77 ft hi�her than Homestead?; i.e., a 57 ft tall buildin� an tap af a 2U ft tall earthen plateau}, tao large af a bi�ildi�l�� a 150U ft diait�eter �iant donut that may look autdated and u��ly all toa saon], too great a density of employees, resultir�� in toa much additional commute time traffic, and it will lead ta a fundamental �hange in the c��iality of life for many Birdland residents. I predict it will alsv lead to an 4 unima�inable increase in traffic-related frustratioi�, especially at Lawrenc�128Q and Wo1ff1280 at commute tin�es. If the Apple 2 Ca�npus praject is appro�ed as it, it will be impossible far tt�ose proUlems to e�er be tindone. This proje�t will fore�er chan�e ttle nei�l�borhoad character of southwest Siirn�y��ale and that chan�e will be almast ex�liisi�ely ne�ati�e. Back to my first q«estsan: How big is to❑ big? Answer: Tt�e Apple 2 Camp�is is to❑ big. It's tin�e that peaple acknawled�e that a proje�t can simply be taQ bi� for a �i�en lo�ation, 5 and it's time far us ta do samethi�l�about it befare it's taa late. Sincerely, Gary Beaupre 1 G52 Grosbeak A��enue 5unnyvale, CA 94�57 ��L1'Z��au��rel��cuii��atit n�.i t4ag� �3�-?g�� Lett C5 Fram: Stan TheMan [stantheman�a�a[a�hotmail.com] 5ent: Thursday, July 11, 2�13 12:a1 PM To: app�ecampus2 5uhje�t: Apple Campus 2 size& road closure This is in regards ta the proposed Apple Campus 2 that replaces the ❑Id HP Gampus. As a resident of Cupertin❑ and a neighbor af this "Mothership" project, I'm cancerned 1 about the immense size of this proje�t and the raad �lasures hoth during canstru�tion and the permanent �lasures after completian. 7he projeet is too big. boes Apple need that much space? The �uilding alane will �e I 2 bigger than the new 49ers stadium in Santa Clara. As proposed, all of the existing buildings will be torn down. However nearly all the buildings are in excellent candition and mast are �urrently o�cupied. Several buildings were huilt in 3 the Z970s and �980s, sa there's little that they need tv be brought up-to-date. Many trees on the ald HP CampuS in�luding its famed Redwood Grove are propo5ed I 4 t❑ be r�maved. These trees should be preserved. As a local resident, I'd like t❑ know whi�h road will k�e closed during the praject. I 5 Is this information availahle yet? After completion, Pruneridge Ave between Wolfe Rd &�antau A�e is slated for complete closure due to the imrriense size of the "Mathership" praject. I use this rvad &feel it will be mu�h harder t❑ get araund because the alternatives are not as easy to tra�el.To the sauth, there the 28p freeway and Vallca nall, 6 making ac�ess via Vallco Parkway nat easy. To the north, there's Homestead Rd, whi�h is already a busy road with Ranch 99 ❑n the �orner. Lastly, a philosophical questian. ❑aes one affi�e building have to kae sa big? I 7 5tan 17-year Cupertino resident Lett C6 Frnm: 5andra a�d Don [mailto:saririrandan��cam�ast.net] Sent: Manday, ]ufy 48, Z013 i1:23 AM To: City Council Su6ject: We support the new Apple Camp�� 5andra and Don Boren support the new Apple Campus. I We love to see more cyclists around and ser�sible shuttle-bussing Qf emplayees. 1 5andra and Don Boren Lett C7 From:Russ Rvtiinsvn�maiito�,russ�fl].l��ix.n?tt_osn.�pm] Sent: Mpnday,]uly p$, �a13 11:13 AM Ta: City Council Subject:Appl@�campus Gaad morning, I wish tp register my suppvrt far khe new App�e campus. I ha�e re�iewed the executi�e summary and agree w+th the appraach and execution prvpvsed, As a historian I am pleased the an effprt is heing made ta reloeate and preserve the historic Glenndenning harn, I retired fram Lo�kheed as reaf estate executive. While at Lockheed I was the project manager for the interior af a very iarge,state of 1 the art buiiding called Building I54. In tadays parlance it c�uld he cafled a green huilding. Many elements oi the huiiding were designed to he energy efficient and this new Appke campus incorporates many of the same features. I am very pfeased to see such a well thoughi au[proposal. R�ss Rahinson 1�825 W.Estates Rr. Cupertino,CA 95�14 4D8-253-2529 russ1U11 wix.n�_tr.orr,[:arr� Lett From: Thprisa Yap[mailto:ryladie99@yahoa.com] CS Sent:Tuesday,]uly 02, 2413 11:59 RM Tv:AarCi Shrivastava Subject: Fw: [�'icBB] Apple 2 fortress-comment period �ear Aarti Here is the pnst that i n4ed ta share it wi�f� y�i�.. Thank you, Tl�u2 isa{ ;�1rs. Yap 7 -----Fon�arded Messaee----- From: Mama-saurus ��?�vrt?yGT�rr��tn� ano��c�+ar[» Tv: mcbb ar»r f�k�,o7vahrJngrour�s��nCn� Sent:Tuesday. J�1y�, 2Qi3 9'3�AM Subject:[McBB]Apple 2 Fartress -comment periad Laoks like it is going to he�ome even more difficult for 5anta Clara and east 5unnyvale students ta make �t to McAulii�e or�tirr�e due ta an hig increase in traffic from the new Apple campus. �he draft Environmen�al fmpact R�port is out an the Apple 2 campus to be huil#at the ❑Id HP car►�pus -and which will hold 5�°la rnore e�playees then HP did at its peak. 1 ItiShere� http:�l�v�,vw.��eriino.�rglin��eK_asox'p��e=1107 It appears to indicate that traffic, among other issues, wil! l�ecame even worse upldown Wolfe and along Hornestead an�i �arstau, ar�dlar trying to get or�lafF 28fl. Apple sn#ends ta shut down a parti�n 4f Pruneridge dri�e t�all {in�l. bicycies I 2 and pedestrians} traffic -- apparently Apple need m�re security than mast of the military contractors that are here in the valEey sa they wifl fence aff the property and close raads to provide a big bour�dary. I ha�en't read through al! the impa�t areas, but am Gancerned about air quality right along �$d at Woffe from the�n-site power generatian that is planned combined with increase in stalled tra#Fic. Given wind 3 pattems of#the bay, it woulc3 seem that locaiize pollution wil! fl�w a�er to Cupertina Nigh Schoof andlar Lawson Middie. �nly w�itten camments are being accepted at this time, as dictated by the California �nvironmental duality Act. There is a form ta submit elecfronic written c�mments fln fhe sarrse City of Cupertina website ar send an email. I would focus ❑n mitigatian ideas as it appears the Cuperfino Council will approve any#hing tha#Apple puts forward. One mitigation idea that I am going tQ sugges# is busing the schflal kids 4 from Sunny�ale and Santa Clara to the district-wide schaals �at Apple's minimal expense}, thus taking many single far-r�ily�ehicles afF the most impacteci intersections. Added benefit is reducing the cflngestion at McAuliffe, Murdock- Portal, and CLIP sites. The city of 5unnyvale will also hold a study session to discuss the draft EIR an July 9 I 5 at 6 p.m. in tl�e council chamber at city hall, 456 W_ ali�e A�e. Soth Facebaak and the 49ers made big donations to the communitiesls�haals that they impacted, but I don't see any simiEar suggestions being made by Apple_ ff 6 anyane knaws otherwise, please share. thanks Ann Lett C9 Fram: Rich Altmaier [mailta:richalt2@yahao.com] Sent; Monday, ]uly 01, �013 $:Z2 PM Ta: City Coun[il Cc: Rich Altmaier Subject: Apple Campus 2 As a lang tirr-ie resident of Cupertino, I feel Apple has hrought a strong value to our city in terms of high tech jobs, attraction ta other businesses, and notice as a place to be in technology. I think the prapased Campus � at the farmer HP site was be a world class facility and we should extend e�ery effort to build it. It wiil hring notice to our community in a very positive sense. Although there may be 1 slight increases in congestion, such as going from the HP site 80�0 odd parking spa�es fo some 14004, let's expecf and ask for good mitigatian efforts. Let's also not forget the strang green sensibility vf typical Apple employees to work ta reduce cor�gestion by using public transit and bicycles? Thank you, Rich Altmaier �26a5 5aiem Ave Cupertino, CA 95�14 408 973-18D9 Lett C10 -----Original Message----- Fram: Rick Haffner [inail�o:hafFri�k(��mail.�am] 5ent: Monday, ]uly 01, 2013 11:�5 ANI T�: City Council 5ut�}e[t: In�reased Traffi[ and Fre2Wdy ACC�SS impravements related t❑ Apple z and Main 5treet??? �ear Valued Coun[il Representatives: I wauld like t❑ knaw what plans there are ta enlarge and impro�e freeway ac�ess as the Apple 2 Campus and the Main 5treet proje�ts are de�elvped? Curre�tly I already fincf it nearly impassible t❑ en�er and exit my apartment community lfl�ated aQjarent ta The Roasted Caffee Bean an Ste�ens Creek �nd Tantau during rush haurs. This has ac�urred since Kaiser was hui}.t and Apple has rented mast �f the affi[e huildings along Tantau A�e. I'm sure the legians of szl�er Apple huses and vans �ruising araund tne area have helped ta minimixe traffi� - as ❑pposed t❑ single driver vehirles - but it was irrespansihle planning fpr �irtually n❑ imprp�ement in freeway access when #he large f�pspital was 6uilt. 1 I trust that with su�h Hl1GE plans for de�elopinent i{� fihis area that same SERTOlJS consideratiai� far the in�reased traffic is heing considered. Otherwise I foresee majnr prahlems being �reated, (as like what o�curred along �86 when 5antana Row was de�elaped with no increase in freeway a�cess}, in what is already a �ery �vngested sectian of the freeway and its onloff ramps during rush haurs. Please take a mvment to dra�e personally in this area during rush hours yourselves. 5te�ens Creek and Lawren[e Expwy. are already extremely �angested. Thank yau for your service and dedication ta representing all Cupertino residents. Riek Haffner 19}.40 5te�ens Creek Bl�d. #f]103 Cupertina CA 95014 Lett C11 From:WilEiam F.Bailey[mailto:wiiliamFaaiiey@yahoo.�om] 5ent:Sunday,]une 3D, 2013 1:45 AM ta: Santa_Ciara_Neighhors_for_Responsihle_Developmenk@yah�agroups.com;cauncil@�i.sunnyvale.ca.us;Ciry Cauncil Cc: BirdlandNe�ghbors@yahaogroups.�om; Raynor Heighbars, Sunny�ale Politirs; NeighhorsFirst 5unnyvale Subject:Re:t5anta_Clara_Neighbars_for_Ftespvnsihle_Devefopment]Apple TI Campus meeting last night Tap, I da appreciate yaur sending us the links tQ the Apple 2 campus de�elapment. In what follows, I'd like ta speak as a rE�sident ❑f Santa Clara, and npt as the Treasurer of�c��i.� L'.I�,r�, �-'f�s�5 E��,ir. At soine S��D pages, Rpp1e's giving us n�ore ini'n for their 17C� acres than tl�e 4�[�� pages th�t the San Francisco 49ers ga�e us Santa Clarans For the 17 (yes, se�ent�eny acres they're de�elol�ing fn aur ci _ry. Very briefly, when one looks at the potential "e�onamic acti�ity," the A��ple can�pus is going to contrit�u.te far more t.o �uper#.inv - and 1c� surraunding citses - t.han tt�� 9ers will e�er coiltribute� t� Santa Clara. The Apple DEIR notes that the Apple� Cam�3us will c�npiny alanut l�,�Cl[] people 1 at capacih�. If'thase �15K 1tnQwledge worl�ers are grossing a median ❑f $50K�year, tteen that's otrer $70�,�DU,OUO a year$n payroll alvne. Those technical prc�f'essianals will be doing fai-inore af their owiz business - home iinprovement, hause�hold, groceries, �eisure, majnr purchases - in the local area than sta�lium wnrkers earning $7,aUa a y�ar in Santa Clara can possik�ly cfo, Tlzat's t.he major reason why t.he Apple campus is, t.o me, a clear winiYer for Cupe.rtino and for its neighbc�rs. (Thc �9ers' Stadium payroll amounts tcs �� s�in�in�� :�17h�� r� yz°�,.3- -- or a miserak�lc 2.4°/a af'the payroll of the Apple Campus at full capacity.� Nonethelc�ss, i had a]ot af reservatians originally. For me, the stir.king p�int was the request that the City of Cupertino a�andan Pruneridge A�ei�ue at Walf'e Raad. It's true: The taxpayers ❑f Santa Glara Neighbors far Responsible Deve�vpment paid far that thornughfare - just as we all waited ��er a decade and paid millions o(�dollars ta have Tas�nan Dri�e link Milpit.as wiih Sunnyval�. Y�t, Tasman �ri�e, � m�jr�r tcc.hnolo�y i�usiness corridor, will be cordoner� aff to ihorQUghfare east ot Great America 1'arkway before the 49ers' ganle days. That's an �sseniiai � loss ta t.axpaYCrs - and it's �eing�ane�or❑ fo❑tUr�tl�r��rze, if yau can imagine 2 anything so blindingly stupid. Sur at least we Sant� Clarans are goin� ta se�I a mess of �heescburgers for ihc. $1.2 billian dnllars that ihe 4t�ers' stadiun� wi�l c�si {Right?). An_yw�y. I w�s nat sympathetic t:o Apple ari�inally, ai'ter the issue af blocking ❑ffTasman ❑ri�e was clis�nissc.d ❑filiand in aur own 49ers' L]�IP. IIowr'�[r, thc one graphi� that changeri my mind ma_y he faund on page 10-of-14D7 of'.�ppc•ndix 13 �ai�rh�� 1�n1�• 171?lR, Lett C11 cont. Nate that the land mass nf the Apple Campus � is almost. e�enly di�ided narth and south vf the current Pruneridge A�enue. If the southern parcel were a lot smaller than it is, then I'd demand of Appie Computer that Pruneridge sta_y put, and that they put guard shacks both n�rth and sauth af Pruneric]ge, 2 But that's iiot the case, and I say that in spite of the fact that the absen�e af ingress�egress on an C011t. aUandoned Pruneridge Av�:nue segment means more pressure on �80 and on Homestead Raad. A.lso, ! must add: Thc abax�donmNnt of Pi-uneridg� at Apple 2 will cause "traffic calming" to thc benefit�f aur neighbors in the southeast�rn corner af the City oF Santa Clara. Personall_y, I like the slnw dri�e ta Vallca by way ❑f Pruneridge A�enue. But as a resident ❑f Santa Clara, I'd be willing ta gi�e that up becaus� of'what I saw in the D�IR link aUo�e, Many t.hanks, Tap, for the A�ple DFIR links. Campaxed to the peanuts that we Sant.a Clarans settled for out of the San Francisco 49ers, Cupertino is cleariy getting the better deal here. 3 At the enrt of the day, the ❑nIy similarity�etween Apple 2 and the $9ers's sul�sidiced st.adium is their shape, Willia�n F. "I3i11" Bailey 10�9 Las Palmas Dri�e, Santa Clara -=0=- From:Tappan Nterrick�taqmerrickCrDvahaa.�am� To:"cuunc-il[a��i.sunnyvale ra.us"«nuncil(�ci.sunnyvale.ca,us�;Cupertino Counoil�ci[yc4�incil[si?cup_ertino.�r�}� Cc:"BirdlanUNcighbQrs[c�yahaogroups.com"CBIFdI811C}AI81q�1bD15(C�y8flDflqf011pS.COR1�;Raynor Neighhars rravnarshineC[�vahpoqroups,cnnz�,5unnyvalE PDlitiCS�5unnvvalPPvlitics[�vaha��rpups.�am�;Neigh6�f5First 5unnyvale aPutNeighbaFhoadsFirst4nSunnyvale[a�yahoogroups.com�; "Sar�ta Clara Ne^yhl�ors toi Responsi�l� �e�eiopment�yahooqro�ps_com" �5an[a Ckara Ne�qhhars For Respnnsible ❑e�elppment@yahpogroups.cDm� 5ent:Thursday,�3une 27,2fl13 4�54 PM su��e�t:[santa_��ara_�vei�hbars_far Respvnsiple_�e�elopment]Apple II Campus meeting last night Dear Mayor 5pitaleri,Hanorable Cauncil Members and nei�,lihars, The City ot'Cupenino l�osteci a meetin�last i�ight tn disci�ss tIie prQposed Ap�ale �I Campus a�id it's Drafi En�ironme»tal Impa�t Repart i��1Ry. No questions were allowed. No comments were allo�.�ed to�e given. No aiiswrrs�ere�i.•en e.rcept that ahc�ut 6SD pas�es of tlza�EIR were a�•ailak�le ctiri linN,aiid the rest a�pa��ntly �vvn't be aG�aiiable until Se�ateml�er? Likewise,questiai�s that were pre��iausly asked,or�°ere hein�sul�mitted as a result of last ni�ht's meetin�,or�ni�lit l�e asked in tlie Future,�+�o�i't l�e answered until tlie tinal E[R in September. 4 The meetin�ended after snme 15 minutes. '�hey��ad C'I7's and flash dri�es{a�ie per persfln]for ynu ta take. P«bli��omnaents mtist be in to the City af Cupertina by.luiy 2�,at 5�3[]PM. Contart them as indicated bela�4•: Any iFiterested persan(s}may prvvide ca�nments sn aiie vf tlie falla�+�ing ways= YDi18r��11COLICI'ECf[U USl'L�lC'Ull�il3@ Cfl111171L'1lI f01"]l7 il[� 111t1',_�!l:�c'liII1C�.t�IL'.�.l��I��:�Iiili�i�ilti � - �-----T1L-------- Lett C11 cont. Yoti may also seiid coizimes�is t«: Depnr[mer�t af Cammusiity�e4•elnE�me:�t. Re: Appl�Cam�us 2, 143d4�nrre Avenue.Cuper[ino,CA 9SQ1�1 For ir�czr�informatiaci un rhis rt�e�t, risit �.��..��.��,rrEin�,_c�r�=i�;I�_�c��n,uti, p 1 1f_----J--= Being a�iseial,paper nriei�ted perso�3 1 acivally printed t�ff�ll ti,DU(]or so p�i�es of the DE1R, lf'you are so tempt�d.sicip t�ie air q�iality report ni'«earl_y 14�U pa�es of numbers. 4 T'I�e Keyser Marston "Ecanumsc and Fiscal Irnpacts Repnrt..." dated h•Iay 2D13, foc�sses iii o�i lSO�v ini��i COnt. maney er•�ryc�ne's�oin�tn m�[ce workin�far Apple�nd how much r��enue earh aFdie C'itie��vill�arn. ln sftint�t, it's a Int af mane_y. nn prohlems are addressed or ans�vered. [only did a hrief re�iew of tl}e ❑EIR, Innkin�� for ansners tn the?�snme add c�uestions tl3e nei�hhnrhvnd had asked�is well as�i�y own qu�sti�ns wl�ile meetin��vid� Apple cnnsulta�it repres��tati�r 14ir. l��c�rleyo un A�ril ?3_2U I 3.�tud found no a¢�s�vers. tlio�i�h to he fair to 1lppie,tliey mi�,ht ha��e been i�iddei� 4tiithin ench uf tl�e 5,0�10 pa�es.L��it if so,aiify one at a tiine. � also re�iewed the materi�l to s�e►uhat streets the DE.IR revie��ed in�heir rr�ttir s�uclv. It did�o�er the"usual sus�ects" includin�W�lFe, La�vrenee, Hvmestead and Tanta�i,pra�icled limited studies of�uail, ]nrerness and Arlarinn,and as t�est as] could see,totallv ikz�nrecl the follawii��srreets thlt mi�ltt well be used as cut-chroi��h 5 streets t4 a�'nid the main streets durir��,nish ��vur: �unford.'l'eal,Lotl�invar,Swallc��•.Peacuck,3�li�l�tin�llc., Lillick,Lorne.1[alford, IIenderson,and Narm�n ta I33�yanl aizd oui. While I am only specula[in�*(until 1�et tl�rou�h the DEiRy,my�uess is that the ne�v�75 lir•ins�unit Ciateway comple�ctt Lawrence and Cl C��ninc�.�tnd the, in the works 5tratford 5�hooL.at the now disappe�rin�Raynt�r Arti�ity Cer�ter are not ii��luded. Nar Gvill a I�i�:h d�.nsity hausin�con7plex we can assume�vill �e t�uilt to 6 replace a?f acre e�sistin�snpliile hcsFne park on Hendersai� be inciucled. 7 tie planned de�elopment of 4?D a�res at Lawren�e and the train tracks,called Lawr�nce Statio��, is prol�ah�y alsa nat inclu�led. �t is my understandine that t1�e City oFSunny�ale wi(I revi�� iliis DEiR at it's re�ularly s�heduled JUIy 9th meetin�,and pis6lir input is welcvme[QK,mayhe not�velcvme,bui allowedJ at[hat time. rl�e meetii��siarts at 7 PM in the Sunny4�ale Citv Council Cha�nbers. I would alsa e»�oura�e r��e nei�lihors tn write into tl�e 5iuiny4aie and Cupertisin cou:uils��itl1 tl�e�r opini�r�s. 7 Their e-mail addresses are pra��sded in the address secFion uf tf�is note_ l will try atic�pro�ide notable upd�ites as I �vork my way throu�h the DEIR. At least Apple dic�n't use He��:�on Traffi�Coiis�iliants. rf�anks for rttrin�,�, Tap Merri�k Car�didate f'c�r Sim�zyvale Council Seat� Tap Merrick for Cawicil?013 ftitt��.'r��.tdd�?iil�n'iCl.lvr;uitir��alr�}r� FPPC'# 135�5G5 1091 F�irtl� Cni�rT 5u�it�v�a1�,[':�9�#Og7 �US--'-44-Z9Di] Lett C12 From: ICei[itiddlS�7c�aol,�om fmailta;Keithddl5?7C?aal,cnml 5ent: Friday, ]une 28, 2013 10;30 AM Ta:Aarti 5hrivastava Cc: City Caun�ii; City Cferk 5ubjeCt: Where i5 the�iry'S weh site link far devel�pment prQjects? aeaT Cammunity Development l7irectar Where exastly islare the city's pr�posed new web site link�s] fiar all important community building pr�jects:be they campletad and appraved,well alang in the pubiic review process,ar brand new? I speculate"new"develnpment is pasted under the"City lvews"heading link.but I wondered if any acti�n was taken�y aur city staft to make special stand alane links an the city's web site where ail developrr�ent projeCts could�e accessed f�und kn one EASY T�F�ND spot,perhaps ioy proje�t name showing assigned city staff who are o�er seeing that prQje�t, with email links pasted for easy dialog between residentsistaftldevelapers? Exactly what happened to that initiative ta update the city's web slte whiah was promised ta the public.by the city coun�il and ciEy staff, now discussed over a year ago, as parf af Rew investment in computer system upgrades in [he building department for stream fining proje�t app4icatians suhmissiflns over the Internet? i spe�utate thai our public�s"easy"a�cess to review of afl project applicatiflns was long forg�tten as part of the huge investmEnt t�T our pub�ic dqNars in com�uter and software upgrades benefiting bofh city staff and de�elapers witn large project applications,t]ui not fpr aur reSitient5 wishing to perfQrm required[fue diligence Q{thQSe I�rge pr�jeCtS wit��ut search�ng through a disarganized ciiy weq site maze fflr long periods of time and simply giving up-the city's�aarfy 1 designed we�site is obfus�ating the pubEic's desire ior transparency of ali fouiiding applications from 6eing easily reviewed. Can you please re�iew the city's public policy regarding timefy pasting and tracking af projects an the cily's wet7 si#e,in example the time�y updating and tracking of large projects like Apple Campus,while they are navigating the pu�lic hearing process heing posted kn ane easy to find pla�e-or are yau.aur�ity staff and city�ou�cil members.against publi� transparency? Surefy the�iggest project in CupertinQ's history,the Apple o#fice project,is an adequate trigger ta reconsider aur public's ability to rev�ew all appEications,inGluding Apples,and that must be dane by updating and adding new iinks on ih�city's web site tfl track each significant prQ�e�t appliGatian frflm start to finish -keep ea�h praject as a separale link,keep all pasted dated available in a s+mple t+me line.d❑ not delets priar postings,please"think"ab�ut des€gning in ease af ac�ess far the public to bath tind and then review that data over tims. Who exactly is in charge of the�ity's weh site and can that persnn he the point persan ta take charge f�r getting this link update�nder way.administrated in a way that is truiy helpful and respe�tlul ta our residents desire ta be well infnrmed and became participating citizens+n our city's future7 Regards 4Ceith Murphy Lett C13 Re:Apple Campus 2 Commenhs-Draft EIR ]une 26,2013 �o whom it may[oncem, The projected en�ironmental impacts uf the plan submiEteO For this new campus is tatakly unrealis�ic For today's reality,,4lready traFfic and pollution are at alarming I 1 levels,[h(s plan will only further enacerbate a very serious situa0on for many with fiar rearJ�irtg[onsequences. I feel strongly that Homestead,a roadway that is a relief from the already severely impaded Interstate 280,w�ll not be readily available. I 2 I am not a resident of Cuper[ino however htomestead oSers an altemadve to the very congested hours iong commute along Interstate 28(]that Is already almost stop and go.Thopgh I am not a fan of high rises everywhere,the amount oF land Chat wili be required for this design constitutes an unreasonabte and vrasteful demand of I land and space currently benefitting thousands oF residents af the Valley.ihe demand for spa[e and the existence and need oF the current relief roadway will only 3 in[rease as Ume gnes an,Do nat appmve this unrealistic and"regal"removal of a publidy owned roadway m appease the dream of a mrporaBon. SinrereFy, Yolanda Reynolds (408)286-6310 AP�Ie�� qa� ,UN 2� 20�3 �� ! P�ess�d bY Lett C14 From: �aiyun Chen[daiyun76�yahoo.com] Sent: Friday,June 21,2073 8;3a PM Ta: applecampus2 Su6ject: En�ironment in mind 1-I i, We are concerned about the fate of the trees in and around the new Apple Campus. A cauple of months a�o, we met a man wha clain�ed l�e was an arborist hired by A�ple and tfiat�ie�lann�d to�liop dowci 6040 trees ori tl�e Campus and around the streets with replacements of »ew trees. We don't kno« it lias been co»firmed by the Apple Campus 2 or not. Tl�ese trees lia�e heen li�i�rb in our neibhborhood for rnore tl�a�i 40 years(?}-whesi we�noved into t3iis area i» 1 1989,they were already qiiite bi�. AFid�ve enjoy so mticti of these beatuiful trees-tkiey�i��us shade in sum,ner and they make our streets,nu�h enjayable wliile walki�z�alonb. Especially t�iey impror•e our �civironmecit and�i��e iis clean air. Please let tti�se tr�es happily li�e in oi�r nei�*]zborl�ood witki iis and our rhildren and childre��'s children. Many t�ianks. We can be reackied either by e-�nail or by phone:408-739-5061 8est Ite�,ards, ,fia and Linda Lett C15 From: Liling Wang [rriai�ka_li8�yan_�af�no_�om] Sent: �hursday, ]une 20, �013 4:05 PM To: City Cfluncil Subye�t: Apple Campus 2 �car Cu�r�rlir�n Ci?un��f. I am t�Ciipes�ti�ii�re�ir�zniti for 3i}year�and�i�7ppy ta��e the�ity grew gra�itially f'ram a f um city to n:i� of'41ie i�it=h tech��nln�,y ce�i��rs uf lhe kvnrld. We tilzn�i3�1 thayi� Apple 1 t'or thtir loyalty ai�cl d�tt.rminatinn tc7 cantii�ue��ra�� in Cups:rtiiia. C'er EnvlfOilfTl�ll[al ��e�nri. A��ple Cai��au�� will brin�_r�m�_*tstion tn }-'$t]. Bul did you r�:meml�er lhat [-?S{1 had alwa}�5 l�a� cni��eti[iun tiin�e ?il ye�7r,a�a. 1 wa�in��reti,ed tliar A��p�e h�t5 made many��l�u�ti in imprn��e.1o�al 2 rc�u�IN�uyti.�nc1 ull�i'iiuliv�cypti�izi5 fctr cmpl{�ye�cr�it7tiit. Uear Cnui�cilmen. I st:�rni�ly suppnr� A�zple cam�ws? prnject d�velc��cJ in Cu��ertiiiu. ll'Apple leave Ctip�s'tii3n, lh��i�y �vill I��tie 3 a lot uf'butiin�5sc�and become a�ity fike Stc�ckctm. We can not aFFord l�see APple I�a�r�uperlinc�. P��a�e �atr ycs and keep Aphie in Cuntrtin❑ A lpyal r�tiicleatl. Gina Wan� Lett C16 -----Original Message----- Fr�m: �anna Austin [��i_�il�g�rim�i9nalCa��omcast,nek] Sent: Wednesday, ]une 19, �013 1Z:52 PM Ta: City Cauncil Sub�ec�: Apple Campus 2 Nlayor �rrin Mahoney, Vice-Mayor Gi3bert Wong, Ciry CoUnc"sl Members: Mark Santoro, Barry Chang, Rad 5inks As a private citizen of Cupertina, a parent, homeowner, and community aeti�ist, I waat tn go an re�ar� as totally su�porting t�e App#e � Cam�us. The ecanamic impact af the Campus 2 headquarters 1 will create thou5ands of 3gb5, and pravide a windfall of tax re�enue For Cupertina. When I see the silver buses and shut�ies and �ikes all around Cupertina, I have great faith that Apple will mitigate the traffic issues�a�ing t�is praject. This is a great opport�nity for Cupertino. Apple is a wanderful company that produces superiar prodt�cts. �onna Austin Lett C17 Fram; Barry Chang [mailto:�aun�ilbarry@gmail.�om� 5ent: T�esday, Iune 18, 2D13 $:14 AM To: Nancy Waad Cc: I(aren B. G ueri n 5ubject: Re: FYI Re: Apple Campuis 2 Dear Bet7lard & Nan�y, Thank yau �ery rnuClt far yaiir ii��ut. Barry On Sat, Jun l�, 2�13 at 1:DU PM, NBIlC]� WOOCI CYl+�i-Il�CC��9��C1�5�]C�lahal_net� wrate: ❑e7l" CQllriGll Me11]lle!'S: For yot�r informatian, I atta�h capies of e-mail exchan�ed Uetween Da�i Wliissen�lunt, af Appie Cqm}�Liter and myself, concernin� the prapased Apple Camp�is 2_ Bernard Wood ❑ear ❑an, Than�s for keepinb yQiEr camm�inicatianlcom»Ze�it cfla�inel apen regardinb A�ple Cam�us ?. My niajar cancern remains �he c�osure vf Priinerid�e A�e. betweer� Tantau a3id Walfe. This street is our maj�r access to �l�rtl�hound I-?8�. 1'our cainpus ? ��aps su��est there is ai�ipie raom to accammadate a throu��i link Qf Prt�nerid�� A�e_ ❑n yo�ir propert_y, if not at st�rfa�e le�el, tl�en perhaps Q�er an over��ass ❑r thro�i�l� a tun�lel that ��a�ild preser�e your priva�y, yet enahle vehic�e and pedestrian rommu�lication bet�veen so«th- and narth-parts of your 1 campus. Pleas� ke�p rne infanned if sucf� a�i alternati�e wo�ild f�e �ansidered. Tlie a�chitect's drawin� that a�c�n�panied your e-mail ir�essa�e s�i��ests you �ua�ild ha�e an�ple space t❑ incliEde sueh a routit�� of Pru��eridge Ave. t}irotigl� yat�r� cam�us. Re;�ards, Bernard Wot�d From: App[e Campus � � I a� I . m� To; " I 2 I " ��l��m�us�a��le.r�m� Lett C18 Fram:�I_:ha�k:�+coi?,cast.�,et[n�ailto:oi+s�a��;.?�r�,n,cas�:.�,et] 5�nt: Mpnday,]une 17, 2013 1:45 PM �o:Cfty Cauncii C�: �pleCam,u52i°�ap �n r•.carn 5ubject:Apple 2 Campus I have ii�ed in the Cupertino, Sunny�ale area a�er 3D years. I hear there may t�e some concems on wh�ther the City Cauncil should approve the Apple 2 project. Often times at various tit�nes of the day, in the area af existing Apple Cupe�fino faci�ities, I have 1 nflt experienCed any unaccepta�le traffic cc]rlditions. Appies erriployee busing pragram now and�ommitted far Apple 2's future wilf corstinue to keep individual cars afF Cupertino streets. Apple has cantinued to keep me and I suppase, ather Cupertina resfdents with their plans far the Apple 2 �ampisx. ��tails for supporting th� Incal �conomy with�o�s, supparting kflcal businesses, supparting lo�al go�ernments and neighborhaods ser�tces as welf as supparting the lacal �amrnunity su�h as S have ne�er sesn pro�ided by any husinesses in the past. Na doubt that Apple has also prv�ided �omplete commitrnents far the ak�a�e ta the City Cpuncii. .iobs for#hose who f�uilci the new�ompiex, revenue for local husinasses who serve Apple and it's employees and p�operty taxes alane are vaGd reasans ta support 2 what in my opinian will become the highlight point far Cupertino. The image that one of the warids top �orporations has it's headquarters locat�d in C�pertino will surely invite ather c�mpanies tv consider Cuperttna as well. �ar the above, I hQpe t�e Cuper#ino City Coun�il will strangly support and go ahead witk�the A�pfe 2 project. There by answering the question, "how can we IV�T sup�art the approval"? �arl G_ Sharkey 208�f] Hamestead Rd_Apt 14A Cupertinv, CA 95�14 Phane: �4Q8}221-0222 email: ailsharkca�co��cast.net Lett C19 Frorrt:]udy G�Ffney f��a�Ito:judvmgaFfneyCgmail.can�] Sent: Mvnday,]une 17,2013 }.�:13 PM To: City CounCil 5uhje�t:Apple Headquarter5 FEelln f wauld like ta send En_v supparc ti�r the ap��ro��ni nf il�e Apple' 1�eadquarter ht�ildin�. l belie�e this is intpvrtant to the city uFCupertino and also helieve that si«re tl�e hewiett Packard Cr�r�nratin��ex�sted u�t ihis sit�w�liCh is close to the 1 sa��e size of tf�e Appie�uildin�s had na inajnr prnble:ns to thc�nviranrnei�t or tr�ftic situatian in the Ciip�rtino srea- there sl3ould br�fo pro�Iem�pprovin�,Apple'- We're�raay iiot to�i��e A��ple o�ir full and complete cnaperatinr�. Tl�ank yvu Ji�dy Gai'fE�ey I US53 Jalii� Way Ciipertis�o.C'A 9SOI4 Lett C20 Fram: 5haunak :r [sha�nakrules[a7gmail.cpm] 5ent: 5aturday.June 15,�ai3 i D:Sfi AM Tv: applecam pus� 5ubject: Apple campus camments. The apple carnpu5 loaks great. I may Suggesl a�na5sive man made lake at the��ntre af'the aval Shaped buildin�. I 1 Apaz�t li�om that, you i�ave rny compliments. -Shaunak, Kennedy Middle School,a�e l3. Lett C21 -----Dri.ginal Message----- From: doliy 5andoval [n�ailto:dolly(rildollysandoval.coni] Sent: Friday, ]une 14, �013 7:26 AM To: RiCk Kitson 5uhject: Apple 2 campus letter Good mprning I wauld like yau to add my le�ter to the puhlit �ammon sectian af �he EIR for the Apple Z campus. 1 Zt is real�y ni�e that tl�is prvje�t is [aming along! 7hanks much, Dolly polly 5ando�a� ��I#y Sando�al Lett 10720 Alt�erbrook L�ne C21 Cupertina, CA 95014 cont. June 14, 2013 Dear City Councilrnembers: I am writing you today in regards to the Apple 2 campus. I was pleased to re�eive a re�ent �ampus update in the mail from Apple with details of the new carnpus. As you know, when I served an the city cauncil 5teve J�bs came and annvunced his intention to keep Apple here, in Cu�ertino, replacing the �urrent buildings on the HP site. His announcement was met with enthusiasm and excitement even thaugh (at#hat time} we dic{n't know wha#the campus would look like. Steve implied the design would k�e both en�ironmentally sensiti�e and a beautiful ❑ne- of-a-k€nd building. L�oking at the current design that is definitely true. As a Mayor and councilmemher, I was particularly pleased that Apple decided to expand in aur city. As you are na dou�at well aware of, many cities court co�npanies like Apple in ❑rder to reap#inancial rewarcfs. It is nice t❑ knaw the substantial re�enue generated by Apple hel�s to fund city pragr�ms �nd the jvt7s 2 they create in our town will coniir�ue far many years into the future. The financial investment Appie is willing{y making is tremendaus, �reating a shared benefit of a publiclprivate partnership, The indire�t dollars spent in ❑ur tawn will be equally beneficial to the city's coffers as well. The long term fiscal sta�ility brought about by Apple'S Current presEnCe and expan5i0n is key tq �ur City's tuture. I am also thrllled at the greening of the farmer HP site. To fiip the percentage of buildings ta apen space is awesome—showing that environmental sustainability is compa#ible with new construction —and can also I�ok g�ad. Jabs' visian of the Ap�le 2 campus complementing the greater surraundings comes through in the designs shawn the public thus far. The example af putting nearly all the parking underground and in structures is smart—again, reinforcing the point t�at open spa�e is important and should be�ome business-as-usual. I five on the side ❑f town that will be most impa�ted by the Apple 2 campus. 7raffi� issues certainly need t❑ be addressed. Having said that, though, r�yself 3 and many of rny neighbors are c�n�inced that Apple's expa�sion in our city is both welcomed and needed. Lastly, the `buzz' App}e creates for Gupertino is pri�eless. When I was travelling in Barcelona a couple of weeks aga, a local asked where I li�ed and I answered "Gupe�tinfl", He stated he didn't know that tflwn but definitely lit up when I replied 'home af the iPhone and Apple Computer'; Apple puts Cupertino an the worid- 4 wide map! Thanks far your hard work on this and ❑ther pressing issues before th�Gity. 5in�erely, ❑QriY ❑o�ly 5andoval Former Mayar, Councilmember, City of Cupertina Lett C22 From: henry zflellner rmail[o:ozhQnri��vahoo.�om� Sent:Thursday,]ur�e 13, 2D13 10:59 AM 7n: City Coun�il Suhject:AAP�Ii June 13, 2013 5irsJTim�Apple Execs: We are in fa�ar of your plans to t�uild a new rampus on t�e NP land. We have been homevwners for 5�years in the Westwood ❑aks tract west of�awrence Expressway and we are u�set re Che clnsing nf Pruneridge �r.for your new construction. Pruneridge drive has been a�onver�ient �CCpSS tQ I 28Q,�f1Cl pplfltS flprill afld SOLJth f�f i�1� I85i 5C1 yeBfS. Wp Cdf1 Sp�0�5 yOUf�f1CIp5UfQ tFld[th�f�IS ample roam far your campus tp allnw for Pruneridge []r.tv remain with minimal mvdifications ta your plans. 7hat would relie�e tv some extent t#�e traffic issues. It appears that it would be easy tfl provide acress to the south section of the praperty by several attra�ti�e bridges or tunnel—that area having no struttures shawn on your map. 5ent to: 1 Cupertino City Council Memfaers The environrr+entaE report is corrett{"not all rosy"}re the traffic problems ai 128a and Wolfe Rd. Living[n Westwaod Oaks tract in 5anta Clara east af 7antau, we rely primarily on Pruneridge Rrf,for ac�ess in and aut of the tra�t to tne W�s�. We objert to the clQSing of Pruneridge. An easy salution would be ta Eea�e Pruneridge Rd. intact and use bridges or underpasses far the benefit of AAPL employees,since the plans seem to show no structures crossing the current roadway. We cauld withdraw our oFsjections if AAP�wvuld prevail on the City to annex the area east af Lawren�e to inciude the Westw��d Daks tract int�the City of Cupertino. We want t�secede fram 5anta�#ara. The city nf 5anta Clara bQUndaries should n�t in�lude praperty west of Lawrence Expressway anyway;an appendage to t{�e city;bad planning 50-80 years ago. 5anta Clara daes not knaw we are here. The city has ignared nur protests re the hated stadium, now ug tQ$1.3 Bil�ian ir� taxpayer�ost,while the�49ers coast on our rrroney. 2 Westwaad Oaks waufd add much to the Cup�rtina tax base,and ICaiser and Agilent wauld add to Cupertino industrial assets tax base. Piease consider our plea to be rid of the misplaced policies of the city af Santa Clara. A Cupertino address would add to i�cal praperty values. Respectfully Henry and 5ally 2oellner 3837 Hancock�rive Santa Clara Ph:4�8 515 5569 Lett C23 From: Vanya{Matrek] [vanya_matxek@yahon.cam] SenY_ Thursday,June 13,2D13 5:30 PM To: �pplecarn pus2 Subjeot: bike la�e.�sidewalk on perimeter of App�e Campus 2 I nate that the creat�or� of Ap}�le Gamp�s 2 will sliminate the segment ❑f Pruneridge Avenue between Tantau Aver�ue & Walfe Raad. Currently there is a conveni�nt sid�walk & �i#�� larr� forming a laop fram the intersectiar� af Wolfe Roa� & Hamestead Rvad ��4ckwise along Homestsad, south on Tantau, w�st on Prunericlge & north an Walfe, It is ur�cl�ar w€�eth�r that Ioop wil! �e maintained if A�ple Campus 2 1 is bu�lt. If Apple Campus 2 will incl�ade a publlc sidewalk & bike lane completing the laop fram Tantau ta 1Nolfe f support it; atherwise. not. Vanya {Matzek} {408} 255-0108 L_:_� _^..^_ A friend is svmeane whv thinks you're a gaod egg, e�en tha yvu're slightly cracked. Lett C24 From:BarryChang fma;Fto:counc�l�arrv�u�amaii.cam� Sent:Wednesday,June 12, 2fl13 5:51 PM 70: parry Pau1 Ct: Karen B.Guerin Sub3�:Re: 5upport App�e CamRus 2 l fi f]arcy, Thank vnu. F3arry �n W�ii,Juti 1?,2�13 at I 1:�7 AM,Darcy PaL�I�-d�il��w][ic�larr�•��_tu]_�i?r�i=�wrote: ❑ear Cvuncil, As a resident in the general vieinity Q�the future Apple campus, I wpuld liite tv express my supp�rt fpr the upcoming �ampus. T'his is a �ery important eleme�t of our future eCanami��i�rancy as a community. Dbv+ousEy, a Ivt af time and eff4rt has already gvne intv analy2ing the�ariaus impacts af this prvjett, and this vF course is a good and neceSsary process ta identify and mitigate p�tential issues. Thus Far, it would seem that traf��congestian is gaing ta be a majar issue. Speaking as someone whose daily�ommute wiH Be dire�tly affected 6y the huiid and the subsequent usage vf khe �ampus, I'd�ery m�ch like to see appropriate measures taken to ensure khat�angestian and the impacts aF traf'�ic are minimized and e�en eliminated. Still, this is nat an issue that shoufd precfude the proje�t from happening, and it is in fact an opportunity to think a�out how hest to 1 design and implement structural elem2nfis whiCh wifl shape aur future cvmmunity. Frpm investments inta vur public-transit inFrastructure, to design of local aC[ess rautes whi�h will minimize congesTion, to utiliky and placement oF a rxaore local workforre, we�ertair�ly ha�e the wherewithal and many tools at our dispasal tn address khis and ot�er iSsues that arise. Perhaps we'IE see a Fleet of electric shutties commissianea. 5till, regardiess oF specifir manifeskati�ns, there is no doubt tha[this project wiil ha�e many p�sitive impacts. Tt's taking many gapd efforts to reap afl the rewards vF the hard wark aF a Iqt vf people thu5 Far, and I exhvrt you to cantinue these effarts with patience and�lear thinking. Thank you for your cantinued eFfvrts in ensuring that this prvject is sutcessful. Regards, Da r[y Paul Law Group, A Prafessipnal Corp. 3�35 Kifer Road, 5ulte 366 $ar�ta Clara, CA 95�51 -------------------------------------------------- T: �C7�617-08611 F: {�fl8) 6I7-0810 E: danaui@darcYOaul.com ............................................... Lett C25 From: Keith Warner[mailto:keith��bcoffices.cor��] Sent: Wednesday,]une 12, 2�13 i1:2D AM To: City Coun[il Subject: 5uppork Apple Campus Z ❑ear Cupertina City Cauncil, As a Cupertinv resident and business owner, I Whqle h�artedly suppart Rpple's Campus 2. The ecanpmic impact�n aur�ity and cvmmunity wili�e huge! And the ecanomic impacl of nar+-apprn�al wauld ba detrimental[a 1 �usiness and residences alike. �lease support the App�e l;ampus�! ThanEs yau in advan�e! Keith -----------•---------------------------------------- Kelth Warner Managing Partner Pa�ific 8usiness Centers 19925 5tevens Creek Rlvd.. Suite 10a Cupertino,CA 95014-2358 Lett C26 From:James Fo�sythe [mailta:jdFarsythe767@sbcg�abal.net] Sent:Tuesday,7une 11, 2013 11:45 AM To:City Cauncil Suhject: I t�taf[y support the c�nstruction and Benifcia! Returr�s �f the Apple Two campus. 1 Apple was and is the greatest event that e�er happened to Cupertina. 2 The prapvsed new Apple Campus wi11 �ravide more jabs, Mvre incvme ta the city and thvse fartunate envugh to ahtain employment at the new site than all other opportunities of the entire City. 3 Appl� Com�ut�r is propasing to build a campus "at h�me" that will be The greatest bvvst to the City af Cupertino and its residents that any and every City in the U S woufd roll aut the "Red Carpet Treatment" ta entice this great op�ortunity ta their�ity. 4 Cup�rtino is idea!!y in th� hub of modern Freeways �01,85,and 1 280 �asily handle the additi�nal traf#ic created by work forc� of th� Campus. 5 The City of Cupertino will enjoy tY�e tax base created by the Campus without a great demand an housing, due ta the being Iocated in the hub vf freeways 101,85 and 28D. A majarity vf the wark will chvose to Comrr�ute from ather cheaper residential areas within a reasonable cammute distan�e. 6 Industrious pe�ple are totally capable of adjusting tv fit necessary Circumstar�ces. The thought of a wark shift �eing from 8 to 4:3t] is a "The Trojan HarSe" nat law, sensible or convenient for modern saciety. A work shift standard far Apple Computer �ased on 1� to G:30 or ather poss�b�e haurs wauld Alleviate the ar�ticipated Cvmmute Impact Prat�lem. Apple Compt�ter has proved to be firs#and f�remast in sfllving any and a!I pro�lems, usually befvre the prahlems occur. Apple Computer is weli known for camplying and pr�moting lacal cvnvin�e. James D °Jim" Forsyth� FPE Retired 21893 McClelEan Road Cupertir�a Ca 95ti�4 Lett C27 Frvm: g7m5grigg@juno.�om [rnailto:g7m5grigg@juno.com� Sent: Monday, ]une ].0, 2013 10:47 PM To: City Council Subje�t: The New APPLE Campus2 I szrppor� �1�e frc�w�If'PLL• can�pr�s a�rd i1s lncarioi7 a�rd havc� a co2rple c�f'strggc�slio�ts !o makc i� c�vc�� narc�bc�frc��cial �a [�rrpc��•1i�ra a�7d 1he cammzrj�lties ajozr��d i1. 1. 12emovc� �he rruffc s�►�j7a1 ar nc�� i�rlc��'scclinjt �f'1 a�tlatr Avcjr2re ajtd P�•trjrc�'idgc� �I vc��7rc� a��d re�place i! wilh �'ratr�7dahUZr1. 1 cic�sig�rc�d�his s•injru! uj�d�hc��•e was jr« 1 I�G'G'C�f(11'II(JI�IG'1'II7L7'7] 10 Ily l0 1111G177l�71 11"pfflC'.flUlh'Illf�r fl'OIYI 02f7' ll]C�2I.SIl"ICII CII"L'L7' Ill1f] �ITG' i"L'S7L�G'71�ICII Q'1'G'Q' I]I �I7G' [T11�Uf.�p]Ifp ['Ia�•a. I cajt'! L'l�G'71 .S'pV �I7Cll Il lh'Q'.S .S'11CCL'.S.Sfl1I I7T L�(]I72�T lhr�l. A rornrr.�crhr�ar� wna�Ir,f he Yi?OY'f.' G'fflL'IG'1?! l�7C111 Cl lYpfflC .S'I�Tna1. Fs�lzetically, 7�fllS l{?G' 1�7L'iY1L' Clf�O�fi" �1G'CIL�Lllfpl"fG'7".S' I7LIIILI7!?�7 as we11. ?. 1 herc appear,s ro bc a pa�•�i�ig s��rc�zrrc�crdjacej�t to �l�G I-28D 1�'rc�c�way, ul�hnugla i� isi�'� labc�lc�d. Hnwc�ti�c�r, nc��i•e rs� �ra c�i�•ect access rr� Wolfc�Road. Y�"lIYlUY�y CICCGS.S !S .f'r-o�n "1'a��auAvej�ue. Therc�fnre, access_frnm I-Z80 worrld he cii•crairozrs,.fi•ajra Wolf'e I2�ad 1n Hc»nc�slecrd Raad ro Ia�7ta��Avej7zre or.fi�r�m Wolfe Iload�o Ya11cU Pajkway lo TCl]]�C12f fIVG'7121L'. flll(1tI7G'1"SL'� Of 1'U2l�BS WO�IIL�I]G' G'XI�I►l�T 1-28()al I.awre»cc 2 Fx�71'G'.S.SYL'Q'�L771L��I.SI77��.SfG'VG'IlS C 1'G'L'k �C12fjL'Vpl"L�10 Tpl?fC721 f�VG'712lG' O�" 2f.S717�T I au�r•cncc FX�]y'G'S.SYI'Q'� l0 P7"�177L'17LI�TL'AVG'1lLfB L7'71L�C'LIJIIIl�r f�71'f]LI�rI? lI?L'YL'.SIL�L'11�1C1I I1G'I�Tlahof•lar�ac� J L'L7'77 .SCI�}�fl'C1i12 G'X�JG'1"7L'IlL'G' �I7L7'� 1I1G'1'G'.SIL�G'Il1.S �7G'1'L' Cll"G' VL'1 y 5'G'17.SIIltiL' 10 lI"L7ffIC I.S'.S21L'.S'. T hc�c�r��'a vehrc•le mrlc�s af�rati�el arc.� ClIS'(] Q'ITL'gativc� i�t�pacl. Glc��»r {�rigg 1�'ormer[�trperli�t� T�'af�c 1:�tgij�cer (YC�tirc.�c�}, Lett C28 From:7ane Yano Emai�tr�:ianey�na•LU�L�ail.�om] Sent:Saturday,]une 08,2D13 8:52 AM Tp: Mark Santpro; Qrrin Mahoney;GiIt7Ert Wong; 6drry Chang Cc: 'yaeko hirotsuka' 5ubjett: HP in Cup�rtinfl To the Cupertino City Cauncil: I understand the revenue henefit the City flf Cupertino will receive as a result of the new HP expansion. HP is pra#�af�ly the only large semi-�onductor industry in the�ity,6ut that shauldn't give them"their way." 1 Is the City willing tp sa[rifiee it's�itizens'and others'cammuting needs to reient ta large industry? 8ip[king Pruneridge,a majortharQUghFare fpr many wha a[tess Hig}�way Z8a from Wvlte Rvad,is n�t a�teptable for thase af us who li�e in th2 Westw�od paks neigh�vrhvod.We,as w2fl as many c�mmuters, would ha�e tv turn left an 7antau to 5tevens Creek and then an tv 280. CurrenYly,mvst peaple acGess�8i]from 2 Wfllfe Road to 28Q and 5tevens Creek to 2$0 is the second a�eess. Eliminating the Pruneridge�Wolfe Road access wouid�reate treme�dous�angestian on the Ste�ens Creek a�cess. HP shvuld redesign che hui�ding so it allows Pruneridge to cantinue tp Walfe Rd.by including in its design an underpass as part of the�uilding,,.a hridge type t�uiiding, The entire buiEding can still be where it's planned but include the underpass. 3 A s�lutian for bath t�mmuters and HP. I'm nnt ane ta protest a�ity's de[ision ort mnsC of its a�tions,but in this partituEar case,I'm fareed to staYe my dispfeasure. I 4 Yvu'll see that Mr.5inks is nat listed among the"70"iist. I�e�t him a separate email. Yaeka Hiratsuka Westwood aaks resident Cupertina lJnion 5�haak district Lett C29 From:]ane Yano[mailto:janeyano��gmail.com] 5ent:5aturday, 7une�8, 2q13 8:37 AiN To: Rod 5inics Cc:'yaeka hirotsuEca'; ']ane Yana' 5ubjett: Hew HP Qear Mr.5inks: i understand the henefit af the revenue that the City of Cupertina will receive as a result of the new HP expansion. HP is proha�ly the flnly large semi-evnduetar industry+n the eity,hut that s�vuldn't give them"their way." Howe�er,bincking Pruneridge,a rt�ajnr tharoughfare for many whn access Highway 280 irnm Wolfe Road,is not accepta6le for those of us who live in the Ulestwood�aks neighhorhvod.We,as well as many cammuters, wauld ha�e ta turn left on Tantau to 5tevens Creek and then on to 28D. Currently,mast peopie ac�ess 280 from 1 Wvlfe Road to 28�and 5tevens Creek to 28a is the second atcess. Eliminating the Pruneridge�Wvlfe Rvad a«ess wquld create tremendous eongestipn on the 5teven5 Creek a[[ess, HP should re[f2sign the huiEding so it alfows Pruneridge tv eQntinue ta Woffe Rd,by including in its design an underpass as part of the building...a bridge type huilding. The entire huilding can still be where it's planned 6ut ir�clude the underpass. A solution fvr both commuters and HP. Yaeko hlrvtsuka Westwood Qaks res'�dent Lett C30 -----Original Message----- Fr�m: Eddie ICua imd�lto:5te�kfrie5�k[��mai�.Cflln] Sent: Thursday, 3une 96, Z613 1:20 PNI To: City Cauncii Subjeet: Apple Campus Z Mella City tounril, I wauld like to say that F fully give in my suppart to making Apple Carripus 2 ex�st. It is such an environmental �nd energy effi�ient bu�lding that ❑nce it's 1 build, ❑ther �ompanies wi11 be laoking at it as an inspiratian t❑ make similar building with energy effi�ient and en�ir�nmental safety qualities. Tha�k you. Lett C31 From: �no 5chm€dt[mailto_e�}os�hmidtC�qm-ail.�om] 5ent: Thursday, ]une�5, �013 2:�7 PM Ta: C+ty Cauncil Sudject: Suppart far the Apple Campus 2 project �ear Cupertinn Ci�y C��uncil and Slat'f nl C�ipertincf. I want tn lake tlsiti opE�arlusiity tu C�}rn�ally re��i�t�r my tiuppnrt f'or the A�l�le Camputi? prn�ect. Frr�m the rc�on� I h��ve seen. Apple's tit�iif har heeii work'sn��lili��ently tn caoperate wiih ll:e ruie�.ind r�gulationti af t€�e Cily n� Cupertii�o, an[� at [he S�u�ic l�me �h�City Cc�ui�cil and tilaFf'are wnrkin� wilh A��zle t�3 help maki the prr�ject a �u�cz�ti f+�r ti�e riticeirti.City and A��i�.. Sin�e 1 li��e 'sn lh� Ranciin R'sncnnadn�rea nF C'iipertinn and conseque�itly vcry rlorc tn the pla��iied r'1p��li C�if�l�llti ? ��rojec[, ynu wiil al�preci:ite that I lidve he�i3 fnllawinR tl�e pri�ject wilh clntie intet�e�c. I��my view tiie anti�ipated i55ueti in�niving cai}�etition,and cc�ncentralini3�nf y titich [ar�e 3�umbers of empluy�eti in o�ie laca�tia��all can �ie re�olved throu=h��raper ad�•ance can5i�eratinn all 1 of which appeurti tt�bc we1! tiinderwuy. W ith App�e alriady beiii�1he larneti[ laxpayer an�!�mplc�ycr En ilze Cily. 1 would l��nk t��rward tn c��3tiiziied rli�sr coaperuti�m hctwr.rr� balh �a�7i�ti. It iti,i rcal acl<<ania��r ta Cupertii��u� be ablt ta rctain and appr��c tiuch a irtajras'�rrc��e�l by an aiready_Mood cnrp��rtttG riti�in. F�Il�tti•itt��the City Council's due deliber�ali�n and L'ftl�li`ll[ �i4��rc�v�il. I lni�� lorw.ird l� ttt� prt�n��l �t.�rt��f'tr�i�tilru�lir�n ancl iiltirr3atLly t«t�te�o�ii�rlcti�n and u�t aF nne c�f'the new "iGOiyogr�iph'sr" a3�chi�ec�uf�ai huilclir�rs in lhc Valley. Thank yc�u f�or your�ontiideratinn. �n��5chn�i[it ]i15S$ Culherttioi� Dri�� Cupci7ii�u,CA 95i134 From:Gary Baum[ma+ItR:q�baumlavvi��vma�l.�nm] Lett Sent:�hursday,lune�5,2�13 9:24 ar� Tn: Piu Ghash C32 Cc:Rar#i 5hrivastava 5uhject: Fwd:Apple Campus&city-wide wifi Piu, Hnr�he r�rord. Th.inkti, Gary -••-------1=ai�•ardcd inc55age---------- Fr[mt:Carr�l K�zrade d':irnlKC�'cu��r�inn.nr�� []a�r:W�d.Ji�n 7,?013 at I 1:33 PM 5uhjcr[:Fw[l:A��ple Campus�cily-wide�rili Ta:Gary Saum�ecirvh:iumla�t[!+�<<Fn:l{I.iUfll7.C�1L'CVI Mannix-5mith[C'hcr�I�1[_�c�y?cr�inn.�:�rg�,Lauiti 5armiento�i.riui,St�+rti ri•,� [ino.r,��R�."Fll�n J.Gartrcr'�C[i�3["IzC["[�'yI1iN I,nv.�.�>»��.",tarnp�'stu��j�la�e.i�s�� [�icim��'ti�a�t��ylaw.uti� Sc�in fnrwardccl mctizagc: Fmin:Gilb�rt W�ng��ilh�rt��nn�,[r,�•inail.c��m[mailtn:_�ilher�swong��gmaiLctmv� I7a�t.:Junc 7.?{}13. I I:IR:{]R PM PDT Ta:17avici Bran�t[1]�E��lE3r.��i�i��rtinu.ur��nail��rl]a�it113L'cti[�cni�in.u3�»,Carol K�7rade CC�II'[�II�L�CLI�.i'iIIIU.��f^_�rnaiEtu:�_irr}IR�•ruper�inu.ur��».Ri�k Ki�yun-- CIZiCI.�4{ri�ll(�Cl-E]]]lt.[il"�Cfll�tillu:I�irkK{s_+'��•urerlinu.�rr�» 5u�jert:Fwd:Apple Campu�8c ciiy-wide wifi FYl ---�------ [�«n��:ircled�11er51�'e-----•---- Pranr. Mar�arcl RciEly em,treiircill�t«��i�i;iEl.�ul17CI71dLIIlC1:13i;tr�•i�riil��l«=in;iil.eum» I]aie:Wed,Jun 7,?013�it lii:35 PM 5ubjcct: �lpple Campu�&cily-wide wili To:�i�4•�«un�.ilCz'cu�?eninu.nr�,rinailtcrci[v«tiE�Ficili�?�t_u�I r.rij�y��,��ra� pear City Cauncil Memberti, 1 am a Cupertint�resident aincl I re�nem�tr wat�hsng t[se video nI'the City C��un�il in[�T.where Steve Jnhti �ttcnd�cl. Qurina lhat mc�tii�c a�uuncil mcm�cr.iti�:�ii St��c iF Appl��ould�rnvid�city-widc witi li�;�Gna��ic daeti in Mnunl�in View. H�r�tipnudc�l ln lhat que�lis�n�hi[cniidc�c�ndin�ly...thut Applc payti lax�s an�that s whai caxes aR 1'�ar_ Well,w�n��w know lhal ApPI�dcu5n't pay it'ti i�ecleral l�txe.ti--or.[E 1�1ti1 urtti��ry treati�e 1 wciyti tc�tikirt th�m. 1 think tfl�t��pi�of Applc}sro4•idin�city-wide w•i1i �houW b�hrcfu�ht u��a��iin. IF ncxhing eltie,it wt�uld l�e interetiti«r�n tiee h«w thcy retipnnd ihi5 time ane�mayhe we mi�l�t wet ihiti tien�ice--which wnuld n�great I��r�verVDi3�� Mar�ie Leiw UI'iicc.�i�f Gary M. Baui�f I99?5�tevens Criek Boulevar[J,Suite I[]fl Cuperlinn.CA �17(]1�-?358 �1L]$-S 3�_fi�46 �,ar�•h:ii�n�l.ne C�� _3�i,iil.c��ii7 Lett C33 From: Chandramph�n [rnalto_ch m�honl,j��ah[i±�_c��m� Sent: 7hursday,3une 05, 2013 4:1Z PM To: City Caun�il Suhjett:Apple Campus 2 To City Council. Cupertino. I am a resident Cu�ertino and own a hnme at 1�24Q, Sterling Bivd. Cupertino. As a langtime res�dent I ha�e seen the lea�ing of HP from aur town ar�d haw it hurts�ur City fir�ances. in �iew of the dwindling re�enue due to such departures, caupled with the ecanomic downturn, it has become im�erati�e that we allpw Apple ta c�mplete their Campus �. . Apple's new Cam�us will hring j�bs, badly needed re�enue to s�pport our schaals and �f course the 1 growi�g rsquireme�t for infrastructur� �pdates. It is irue that an increased flow of traffic and increase ir� papulatian density will bring some Cfiscamfgrt to the residenc�. Thts calls for sacrifi�e ai certain luxuries that a small tawn offers but the alternatives su�h as increase in taxes ta the already high house taxes is fright�ning. I would like to hereby register my whole hearted endorsement of the Apple 2 Campus prnject. Thar�ks, Chandramohan Mathu 1 Q�40, Sterling Blvd, Cupertinv, CA Lett C34 -----Original Message----- From: Aditya GMAIL [inailt��:aditvavarinaT06� rnail.�om] 5ent: 7hursday, 7une 95, 2013 8:45 PM To: City Caun�il Suhje�t: Apple Campus 2 dear Counci3., Apple is expanding a Gig way in Cupertino, which to me laaks like Mpnapaly si#uation. Cupertino real estate fs nn high peak, just herause of Apple emplvy as they buy the praperty after selling Apple stvcEc and take henefit of taxes. It's hard for common person to buy property in 1 Cupertinv. I am against Apple Campus 2 �onstru�tiQn. Nape my thaughts wilY be consirlered. Bes#�Yash Sent from my iPhone Lett C35 Letterl0 500140 Name Geoff Paulsen Address 10557 Rndy Ln City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA 95014 Email geoffpaulsen@yahoo.cvm Suhject General and speciflc Cvmment Apple camments July 2fl13 I am very exGitad about this project and what it will da for Cupertino. In general,t�e EIR is well Ehought out. However, it does not loak far enough chronologically inta 1he fu#ure, nor does it Ioak far enough geographicalEy into the Cupertino community. This will be Cupertino's landmark for a lifetime—probahly se�eral lifetimes. I would suggest that the huilding be taller—"padded up"to provide more parking underneath,and rr�ore stories tprobably twoy added to provide room for future growth-�ut especially to provide a prominent�isi�le landmark for aur cammunity. 1 I'm afraid the new building will get Iost in the forest.The trees are wonderful,and tt�e building as planned will Iook great fram the air, but it needs to be seen between and above the trees as well. Alsa,Apple alsa needs to open its doors to the community.There was a suggestian at a recent General Plan Amendment meeting that we ha�e an Apple museum.What we realfy need is an Apple visitor Center,with a store, museum,and interpretive talks_This cauld be 2 a destination for the world in sa many ways—why limit ourselves when we have#his great ❑pportunity? Speci#i�afly Regarding: "PLAN 3b"{north-south traif Parallel to 28fl}. I wauld re�ommend gaing beyond just a study ta include pubEic camment,design,and�anstruc#ion. This would he a great recreatianal and 3 alternative transpartation asset to Apple and well as ta the Cupertina community. BIa-3 I recommend a mix of old and young�1 gallonJ trees,since smallest trees grow faster in the long r�n, and wifl out-grow a large transplanted tree o�er time. I know that Apple has l�ought e�ery 60"boxed oak that's a�ailable, but we do not need complete 4 instant results, but ra#her an urhan forest that will best endure in the long run. HYD-1; Every effort shauld he made to reduce urban runoff through state-vr-the art methvd including swales,rainwater storage cisterns, and permeable surfaces. I 5 Trans:{al�)"Wideni�g roads to salve traffic congestion is like Ioasening your t�elt to cure obesity,"says Wafter Kulash,a trai�i�engineer fram Drfando, Florida. I agree.We have ta look at long-range solutEOns, su�h as higher density housing [and ac�ompanying better �kgh1 life}near Apple, as well as alternatives such as high-speed dedicated bus-only lanes 6 —not just on 5te�erts Creek, but even on 280 and 85.As a founding member of the Cupertino Bi�yclelPedestrian Commission, E am canvinced that such raad"Impra�ements" will would make our roads much mare di�cult and dangertius for serious cyclists. Table III-1 {Qevelapment 5ummary}A Sfi°/o reductio�in square feei per employee.Just wondering—will it be a�rowded work environment? 7 The need for a park: "Mos#of the site would t�e surrounded by a security fence..."Apple's "fundamenfal ot�jective far priva�y,security,and the prote�tion of intelle�tual property"[project description}is understandabEe, but it is cantrary ta the Gity's need for parks and apen space.There is n4 reason why ihe fence line coufd nat be madified ta allaw $ public access—much as urban l�uildings allvw public a�cess to their plazas.As a Cupertinfl Parlcs and Recreatian Commissioner, I befie�e that not all parks ha�e to t�e big—they can include smailer spaces far intimate con�ersatian as well as solitude. Lett C36 Letter IO 500139 Name Neighbar Add ress City,State�ip Santa Glara,CA Santa Clara Email Subject Traffi�Cancern Comment f'm a resident of Santa C1ara in the neighborhood of Westwoad�aks which is directly east of the praposed campus. I'm cancerned with traffic an Pruneridge Ave.The current HP camp�s hasn't been fully occupied fvr prabably o�er 1Q years. But w�en it was fully a��upied, Pruneridge traffic was very heavy.Quring evening hours, lf you were going wesEhound on Pruneridge and wanted to turn left onto Wolfe,you had to wait through at least one redlgreenlred traffc light cycle and sometimes two cycles before you could get onto Walfe-adding many frustrating minutes to what in#he past had heen a very quick drive. Simlarly,going eastt�ound on Pruneridge to turn Eeft onto or�ross Lawrence,you had to wait through at least one traffic light cy�le.That was the worst Pruneridge traffic has ever been. Naw,Apple wants to add 40°Io more employees over current max occupancy.The traffic in the late 9as, early 200fls is the anfy data point we have{besides traffic models}to foresee 1 what trafC�will laok like.Adding this many more�ommuters will undoubtedly have a very negati�e effsct on neark�y residential traffic, lawering our qualiry af life.This daesn't e�en include the fact that fore�er in the future after the proposed�ampus is built,each and e�ery time we want ta ar,�ess 280 northbound,regardfess af traffic, minutes will be added ta our drive be�ause of the ciosure of the segment nf Pruneridge. Nearby Santa Ciara residents ha�e little say in this process fhough we will be impacted the mast-as will the nearhy 5unnyvale residents. In the case that aur traffic cancerns are not mitigated, Santa Clara residents do have an option.Thai option would be to close Pruneridge at the Santa ClaralCup�rtina border east of Tantau-maybe keeping it apen ta footlbike traffic. How would�losing Pruneridge at the 5anta ClaralCupertino border affect surrounding traffic and afFe�t this project? Thank you for your time. Lett C37 Letterl0 50�138 Name �ean Fujiwara Address 1725 Linnet Ln City,5tate Zip Sunnyvale,CA 94D87 Email d.fujiwara@cvmcast.net Subjec# TraTfc impact at Homestead and Linnet Lane and Heron Ave Comment The comrr�uniry of 15fl plus homes in the 5erra Gardens neighhorhood has vnly Heron A�e and Lir�net Lane to get into and aut of the�ommunity. No one has addressed the issue to make sure the�itizens can lea�e and get back inta their homes during rush haur and normal times. Please note that 3�ommercial proje�t along Homestead Road in the irnmediate area{Cupertino Vil[age 5�opping Center,Apple 2 Campus and Homestead 1 5quare 5hopping Centery all will put additionaP traffic on Homestead Road.We at this time are already having a difficult t€me tiring to get inta and out during rush hour.When these 3 projects gets�ompleted it will be�ery difficult or impossible. The cammunity daes not suppart any of these de�elopments if the traffic problem is not svlved.We would like detailed plans to soive the problem before the Apple 2 project starts. Dean Fujiwara Lett C38 Letter ID 5Da137 Name Ken Nishimura Address City, State Zip , CA Email nishimura.ken@gmail.com Su6ject General Comments Apple Campus 2 ❑EIR Comment I ha�e read the DEI�2 in connection with the proposed Campus 2 project �"Project"}for A�ple Computer, Inc., hereina#ter referred to as "Appl€cant."This is a huge praject with tremendous impfications for the quality oi life far those within Cupertfno, as welE as surrounding 1 �ommunities. Most ot the comments are related in some way to transpartation, as near3y all aspects af the project will ha�,e su�stantial impacts to the local transportation infrastructure. The�omments are arranged in no particular arder ai importan�e or priority. 1}Although Applicant has stressed the amoun#of green space the proposed Project will encompass, nor�e of this will be pubficly accessible and thus generates no public benefit. In tact, Appli�ant wishes to�reate a#ort with security fencing encompassing the entire site. 2 Nowhere in the City is there such a farge block of land where the publi�will be enjained lrom traversing. The size af this 'Yortress"will impede pedestrian access along the eastern edga of Cupertina. 2}7he�losure of Pruneridge A�enue is traubling. Appli�ant states this is necessary for security. Removal of Pruneridge will remove a major bicycling and pedestrian thoroughfare in that regian. GE�,en the tremendous increase in�,ehicle traific expected on Ste4ens Creek 3 Blrci., Tantau Ave., and Homestead Are. due to tYse Profect, cycllsts will be#arGed to negotiate congested roads made worse by the Praject for east-west access. Applicant has not provided a meaningfu[ mitigation far loss of this puh[i� right-of-way and benefit. Applicant should be required to proGide a free and publicly accesslble shuttle ser�ice#rom the intersectian of Wolfe and Pru�eridge ta the intersection oi Pruneridge and Tantau Qn a Irequent Gasis. 5uc�shuttle should be compatible with bicycles and be operated to provide 4 a time-equivalent alternative to the walking path which wifl he remored with the clasure of Pruneridge. 3}Applicant has not proposed a meaningiul solution to th�impending tralfi� cQngestion shouEd the Project go forth as propased. The existing inirastructure will be o�rwhelmed by the traffic entering and exitir�g the site. 5pecifi�ally, facilities to ac�ess I-28D#rom the �ampus are woefully undersized for the size ot the Project. Applicant should consider reGuifding the I-280 interchange with Wolfe to i�ciude access ta and from Tantau to pror,ide 5 1or direct access to and from the proposed Praject. As it is, the interchange at Wolfe wiii quickly saturate, causing spillaGer to tne De Anza and Lawrence Expressway lnterchanges. The interchange at Lawrence is parti�ularly trauhlesome as it is slready at �apacity and its design does nat ailow ior easy expansion. Tralfic will spill over anto Ste�ens Creek, Tantau, Cie Anza and Harr�estead roads leading to grldiack. 4}Applicant proposes a number ol r,arious mitigations for Project impacts, but due to the multi-jurisdictional nature of the site, most mitigations are outside the jurisdiction of the Gity ot Cupertino and hence, within the scape af this DEIR, cannot be assured ot cnmpletion. Applicant therefore does not ensure that many of these critical mitigations will be put into place. Applicant must se�ure approval for each planned mi#igation and the pro�osed impact 6 of the Project and eflectir�eness ot a!I proposed mitigatEons be taken as a whole. Appli�ant shou€d r�ot be granted credi#for a rnitigatian for whi�h they ha�e nat Ueen granted approvaf, nor should the Project be appraued k�ased upon mitigations which �ave nat been approved. At the�ery least, an occupancy permit shouid not be granted unfil all proposed mitigations which are ineluded in the acceptance of the final EIR are in place. Lett C38 cont. 5}Applicant's prvposal iar a pullaut on Tantau increases the risk far bicy�lists as 4ehi�les will be atterrtpting to pull off ar anta the raadway in the path of Gyclists cantinuing straight on Tantau. The plan does not indicate any stop or yield signs. Vehicles exiting the transit laop should have a stop sign. The left turn from NB Tantau into the transit loop poses a ] potential hazard to cyclists proGeeding S6 on Tantau, especially in the vicinity of large buses. A stop sign is required. The pEIR�ontains written description of a protected left turn out of the transif IoQp, but the drawings published earlier in cannectian with this Project {Perimeter Bicy�le Strategy, dates 4112113}, daes nat show this signal. Whi�h is correct? fi}App[i�anYs propasal that TpM �erification activit�es not be perforrr�ed during periods of in�lement weather is inappropriafe. To the degree that compliance with T�M goals requires modes of transportatiQn substantially impacted by weather[e.g. walking, cycling}, Appli�ant needs to pro�ide a meaningful and measureable TDM mitigation for days of inclement weather. Although the City has generally good weather, inclement weather is not unusuaf, g nar should a transportation plan be designed based on 10Q°/o good weather. UnEess an alternati�,e inclement weather mitigation is included, the Project will generate u�acceptable traffic during days of inclement weather. Applicant cleverly asks that this violatian not he measured, but this request should be denied. �nly through measurement of TDM effectiueness during periods Qf inclement weather will the City understand the true impact of the Project. 7]The praposed penalties#or not achie�ing T�M goals are woefully inadequate. Gir�en that a reasanable estimate far the cost af proGiding an AppEe 5huttle seat is �35lemployeelday, the proposed penalty of$5 is only 14°/0 of the cost of corre�tion. When the cast of the penalty is only a small fraction of the cast ai the desired corr�ctive action, the penalty 9 be�ames the default action and the desired objectiGe is nat met. The penalty sl�ould be increased tenfold#o$5�lo�eragelday su�h that the Applicant has the economic in�enti�e t❑ meet the stated Project goals. 8}The stated incompatibility betw�en a"trip cap"and employment growth is not true. A trip cap would require a concomitant imprauement in TDM metrics commensurate with em�loyment growth. While the Applicant can certainly desire unmitigated growth in trip 10 �alume, such growth is incompatible witt�the infrastructure and must be regulated. A tr�p cap meets these objectives. 9}Consideratian should be given to metering traffic out of the Project. Metering lights, though initially derided, are now understood to impro�e efticiency and impro�e traffi� 11 capacity. Metering may be required to regulat�the flux af�hicies aut of the Project to pre4ent gridlack. Gridlock also is extremely inefficient with respect to GHG emissions as GHGs are emitted with na net useful acti4ity. 10]Applicant daes not indicate where parking for the Ap�le Shuttle buses would be located. Gi�en the large numl�er of busss inwl�ed, oft-site parking and shuttling of buses fo the Project could result in a significanf traffic impact and GHG emissions. Where would be 12 buses be fueled?Wil! large quantities of diesel fuel be stored on the Proje�t slte?Now much diesel iuel will he stared on site tor the emergency generators, and are adequate measures put into place to detect and contain leaks and spills7 'I1}Serious consideratian should be gi�en to the reduced density option as the Applicant has not shown means by which the desired Praject can peacefully �a-exist within the 13 propased infrastructure. Lett C39 Let#er ID 50n135 Name Patricia Mefcic Address 3824 Pruneridge A�e City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara, CA 95051 Emaii patt.mef�ic@intel.com Subjeet NO—toa large—need to bring down ta'/<size Comment Violates air quality standards-during construction and traffiG afterwards-wifhin one mile I 1 surrounding site 280 Wolfe and Lawrence exits would be jammed-backed up onto 284 for miles— I 2 Lawrence already overloaded wlKaiser traffic Cancerned that the intersec#ion of Pruneridge Ave.and Tantau was not included in the I 3 Transpor#ation section (Tahle II-1: 5ummary of Impa�ts and Mitigation Measures from the EIR}.Also,the Parking 5tr�cture entrance and Transit center are locafed on Tantau. This I 4 impiies that almnst ail o�the daily trafF�associated with the proposal wili he using Tantau and its associated tributary streets. Furthermore,there is no mention of what promises to be a significant traffic increase on Pruneridge Ave., ifself,as commuters will likely use this 5 route as an alternative to reach the proposed site and the aforementioned Parking Strue#ure. Pruneridge(Tantau-Lawrence)--is resid�ntial calming street—single lane only- I 6 safaty cQncern for bicycleslpedestrians prahibits more trai#ic Lett C40 Le#er10 500134 Name Jennifer Hodor Address 1625 Nightingale Ave C9ty, State 2ip Sunnyvale, CA 5unny�ale Email jen_hodor@yahaa.�om Suhject App1e Campus 2 L�EIR con�erns Cbmment l'm writing to wice grave concerns about the future Apple Campus that will soon be down the strest from my SunnyGale home. I have lived in my Nightingale home for aver 3� years and ha4e suffered from increasing traffic issues in the area around Wolfe and Homestead 1 and i foresee that it wi3f be made substan#ially wQrse by the new Apple tratfi�. I woufd like to inform Cupertir�o and Apple that Apple's current plans are_not_ac�eptable to the adjacent Sunnyvale neighborhoad. Specifically: 1}As detailed in the environmental im�act report, the entrance ta#he praposed corporate exercise facility will pose significant problems for residents an my street. The plan needs to �e modified to increase the parking thaf will pe made a�aiiahle on the�ampus to pre�ent from negatively affecting our neighborhood. Addifionally, there is no need to provide pedestrian ac�ess at Nightingale to their facility as there is a �rasswalk at the interse�tion approximately 1�Oit from the propased entran�e. The addition of a crosswalk at Nightingale 2 wil[ anly encourage people to cir�umuent the traific generated by the new facility, take short- cufs through my neighborhood and �ause parking issues on my street. 5ince Apple has s❑ much land on �ampus, it would be easy ta ensure that access to the exercfse facilkty is made internally to the campus rather than affect€ng adjacent communities. 2}Adding a corporate bus drop off an Hamestead is going#o in�rease traffic problems at an intersectfon that is already o�er�urdened by the fratfic irom#he vallco shopping camplex at that corner and the Kaiser facility down the road. Please keep any bus stops you create off 3 af streets with resider�ces and mo�re them to either Wolfe or Tantau where they currently reside. A bus stop there will only further impede traffic, create additianal naise for the nearby residences and likely cause traffi�accidents. 2J Prouiding .77 parlcing spaces per employee is inadequate and not planning to aGCOmmodate for the rrzajarity of the emplayees is just plain foolish. Apple has the land on the campus, they should use it. And i1 it mea�s Apple cant a�hie�e 'accepta�le'traffic 4 le�:ls surrounding the campus with the added commuter numbers, then the plan needs to be rer,ised#o have Apple pay for additional street der,elopment to mitigate the traffic problem s. 3}Do not close Pruneridge road. Rlthough the num�ers of cars currently using the street are srr�all, a lot of the traffic gaing through there will be diverted onto Hamestead as people regularly exit 28�o�Wolie to get ta their hornes on the other side Qf the campus. The WoIfelHomestead intersection fraffic was already rated poorly per the E1R, and these individuals will now be utili�ing Homestead, thereby increasing both the traffic and noise for peo�le in my neighborhoad. Increasing trafli� by just a couple of percent, whi��this will do, 5 wiif create nightmarish tratfi� patterns at this interse�tion. Already, cars cut through our neighborhofld during commut��aurs to auoid waiting for 2-3 light cycles at the HomesteadlWolfe intersection. The traffic is already backing up at this intersection and the[r propased plans are gaing to make it un�earable. Keeping it open would also minimize tt�e number of commuters travelling down Homestead. The primary entrance for the iormer HP Lett C40 cont. Gampus was put anta Pruneridge in order ta minimize traffi� concerns ta our Sunny4ale 5 neighborhaod and did very well when the site was fully statfed. COnt. 4y Since the Apple campus now extends to 280, ideally, I would like to see an entirely separate sntrance on 28D that leads directly onto ths Apple campus so t#�at employee traffic is remo4ed trom current routes. Apple should be creating easy access to their facility 6 by creating multiple ac�ess points and mo�ing as mu�h of it as possib[e onto their awn campus. In summary, please compel AppEe to moue employee transportatian plans anto their campus rather than the adjacent roads and increase the arr�ount of parking they make a�ailable ta employees. Apple has a corporate respansihility to address the needs af their 7 commuting employees as well as the surrounding �ommunity and the current plans fail ta adequately address these issues. Regards, Jennifer Hodar Lett C41 Letter IO 50�133 Name Martin Landzaat Address 562 Carlisle Way City, State Zip 5unnyvaEe, CA 94�87 Email martin_landzaat�hotmail.com Subject Access to CLJSQ alternative schaols Camment Many Sunnyvale residents that reside within the Cupertino lJnion School Qistri�t{CUSDy have children that attend one of the aiternative CUSn schools(McAuliffe, Murdock-Portal, and Faria). f ha�e a child that currently attends McAufifFe and tra�el alang Wolfe Rd.far s�hool drap-off and pick-up. The Apple 2 campus will make it more di�cult for 5unnyvale 1 residents to travel tolfram the CIJSD alternative s�hoals, especially McAulifFe and M�rdock Partal. Please mitigate the impact af the Apple 2 proje�t so traffic at Wolfe Rd. and 128Q daes not hecome burden for Sunnyvale resident that use CUSQ alternative s�hooEs. Lett C42 LetterlD 5�Q132 Name Ronald Moore Address 19967 Fear Tree Ct City,State Zip Cupertina, CA Cupertina Emaif ronaldmlZ4@aal.corn 5ubject APPLE CAMPUS 2 COMMENTS Comment I SURP�RT THE APPLE CAMPUS 2 FOR THE FDLLOWING REA50NS� I heartily support the appro�a[vf Apple's Application ta build Apple Campus 2 in Cuperiina.. I ihink it wil[he henefcial,and will help Cupertino to be more prosperous. When 5teve Jvbs appeared at the Cupertina City Council meeting on June 7, 2a11,to announce his proposal, a woman in the audience rr�ade some negati�e remarks about it, and Mr.Jo�s responded:"Do you want me to move my headquarters to another City? �Mountain View}"Any City wvuld gladly welcome Apple to va�ate Cupertino and locate in their City. For example 5unnyvale, especially, is licking it's chaps. Please dan't let that happen. Keep Apple here, in the City where it all began. There will always pe Naysayers, Philistines, t�7hilistine-a persan who is hostile ar irodif#erent to culture and the arts,or who has no understandi�g vf them: a def nition frvm a diGtionary}, and Peaple who simply make up statistics,or project unfounded facts about traffic, e#c. Don't le#them dri�e Apple out af Cupertino. It is likely tha#consoiidating many of Apple's buildings scattered in Cupertlnv,Sunny�aie,Santa Clara,etc. into one area with an on-site parking lat wil!help alle�iate some trafFic problems in near�y Cities. CIJPERTIfVO HAS 50ME UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES First af ali, Cupertino has the documented right to claim to be the"Birthplace of the Personal Camputer Industry."Apple Computer was started on April T,1976, hy Ste�e 1 Wozniak and 5te�e Jabs,and incorporated hy them on January 3,1977 in Cupertino, California.Apple's"Appfe 2"r.omputer was the frst truly"Personal Computer."Also it was not a"kiY', as many�arious pre�[ous attempts were[including Apple's innovati�e"Apple 1"}, that had to be assembled and pragrammed,etc.The"App€e 2"was the first persanal romputer, camplete out-af-the-box and ready to go. lt was also the first to come in a plasti� r,ase and to include colpr graphics.The"Appfe 2"was�and still is}an impressi�e machine. I still have mine. I ha�e at least 14 Apple Computers and many other Apple peripherals and produ�ts,like my A�ple Graphic Tablet, on which I did three drawings{IElustrations"}at hame far SRI. I was tQld by the �ditars, they were the"firsY'�amputer Illustrations ever puhlished,and they were in a repart by SRI's"Long Range Pfanning Service." 5e�ond,Apple is famous worfd-wide because of the Steves we adore,who are regularly known as"�he Boys from Gupertino"in the news, baaks,and tither references. 50,Dur "Little Cupertina"is also becomir�g known world-wide as a Landmark. Third, Apple is Cupertina's largest source of retail tax re�enue far Cupertino. Let's hope App€e, Inc. remains here. Besides haping, let's da all that we can ta encourage Apple to continue to keep it's Headquarters here in Cupertino, it's original Homeland. Now, abaut Traffc.Apple already occupies most of the buildings in Cupertino and is spilling over inta nearby�ities. It is reasona�le to assume that Apple will consolidate the scattered 2 employees into the new Gampus, and some Traffic will only�hange places and will �ot increase. Hawever Cupertino, like all cEties needs Traffic{hath types}to support the atYrer husinesses that it hosts in Cupertino,ta keep them profitable�iable, and staying open,for additional ciry retail tax revenue. New employees will likely jain the patronizers Qf Cu�ertino's other 3 businesses, ❑n lun�h hours and after wark.We Cupertino's residents akl need to support all of Cupertina's businesses. We also want other peaple to come and shop in Cupertino. It would be foolhardy to dis�ourage the traffc of peaple�oming ta Cupertino ta shap! Lett C42 cont. 5peaking about supporting Cupertino's businesses, I hope for a new 5tore.As a sharehalder, at a shareholder's meeting, I ance asked Mr. Jobs: "Why don't we have an Apple Store in Cupertino?" He replied : "I get a lot of requests for stores. I don't think one here would get mu�h Traffc"�However, in this case, what he was referring to is a marketing term: "Traffc" meaning customers who go i�to stares, and no#to road trafFic, He thought that not many people would actually visit an Apple stare in Cupertino.} 8esides my Apple II, as I have said I have faurteen Ma�intoshes. I know there is a company stare on Apple Campus 1, t�ut you can't huy Appfe Hardware tf�ere; in fact you can't buy Appfe hardware anywhere in Cupertino. We need A�ple's Real "Flagship Store"to be here in Cupertir�a. I am happy to live in Cupertino and I would enjay shopping at an Apple store here. It is annoying to have to ga to Apple stores in other cities. I'm sure I'm not the only person in CUpertino who would go into an Apple store here. When Mr.Jok�s announced his plans for Apple Campus 2 a#the Gupertino City Council, he said: "Many people will �ome fram all aver the warld ta look at this new huiEding, espe�ially Architects and Ar�hitectural students and Tourists"That is potentially the"Good"Traffic that Mr. Jobs said was needed that�ould t�e flling a Glarious New Appke Store in Cupertino: either in fhe 5pe�ta�ular New Apple Campus 2, ar in an Apple "Logo" Shaped Store, as viewed from the air,with classes and other events in the in the right leaning"Leaf."That store cauld t�e located in the proposed Main 5treet Project nearby, and could allay any 4 Apple concerns for privacy. But if our many wisY�es are denied and there is no hope e�er for an Apple store here, and Cupertino remains as Apple's Orphan, then imagine those hundreds, or mayt�e thousands of visitor's disrr�ay, disappointment and then bewildered looks wondering"Why is it that there is no Apple 5tore here, or even nearby?", and for fhem to learn that they would have to trave] abaut six miles away to the dinky Apple store at Valley Fair shopping mall an the border�etween San#a Clara and 5an Jose, California. Isn't that in�redibly ironi�and dumh?Corne on? Apple. Let us buy Apples here in your Apple Or�harcl. ❑K, your Apri�ot�rchard, if you say so.We need your truly"Flagship 5tare" here in Cupertina, not in some other Gity. I worked at 5tanford Research Institute�SRI}in Menlo Park for thirty seven years{1955- 1992)as a Creative Artist. In the late 1960's, {in my own late Thirties], I was Creating a Graphi�, for one 5Rl Camputer 5cientist,that was showing a Bubble Chart illustrating how mu�h memory would be needed by mainframe carrsputers in the future. I remarked that: "I could hardly wait to have one" He asked; Ha�e what?" I rep[ied: "A Computer!" He loaked at me and said: "You want a Computer on your Qesk?' I said: `Yes" He said: "Not in your Lifetime!"That Computer 5�ientist was alsa named 5#eve. 50. I Thank you, 5teve Wazniak and 5teve Jobs, far bringing to me what I wished for in my thirties, yaur excellent"Computers on my Desk" in my life#Eme, since 1977! I will continue to buy more Apple products, now in my early Eighties and more, God willing! Lett C42 cont. CLJPERTIN�, DQN'T MAKE A TERRIBLE MISTAKE. ALL�W APPLE CAMPUS 2. C�pertino, don't miss the opportunity to�apitalize on your i[lustrious histary as "The Birthpla�e of The Personal Camputer Industry, and the Home of AppEe, Inc."We also need 5tatues of the two Steves: Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak�"The Woz") by the excellent sculptor who did the wonderful statues of the two Na�y Seals in Memorial Park.Thase New 5tatues should be lo�ated in the"Main 5treeY' project and lacated near a new Apple Museum, and a new Cupertino History Museum �alsa f�ousing the Chamber of Commerce, 4 my suggestion made at the Sandhil! series}, both ta be housed in a Wooden 6uilding, as opposed to other material.We wanted a warm feeling. as we citizens specifically asked for COnt. in the three Sandhill "Main Street"meetings by graups of�ofunteer citizens se�eral years ago. �Please look at the entire specifications on tf�e charts and natations of those meetings.) Isn't there a Cupertino Chamber of Cornr-r-ierce here? I thought so! I never hear anything about them. What do they da? if there is one I hope that they support Apple Campus 2. Ah! I saw in the comments that the COC does support Apple Campus 2. Good for you! To all of thase involved: Please. dan't delav APPLE'S CAMPl15 2 �roiect anv lanaer.The casts of labor, IVlaterials, and many ather elements cor�tinue to rise daily. Again, Qon't delay! Let the good times roll an! Sir�cerely Suhmit#ed, for the Goad af Cuper#ino Mr. Ranalcf Jaseph Moare, Sr. GuperfinQ, CA 950 1 4-231 8 1-408-253-1197�.%L:� ranaldm124 a�,7aol.com Lett C43 Le#ter IQ 5D�13i Name Patrick Ra�bins Address 3895 Pruneridge Ave City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara, CA 95051 Email p.robhins@�omcast.net 5ubject Comments on Apple Campus 2 ❑EIR Comment In reference tQ the DEIR: Page 212-t4}Light and Glare Ref page 212-215. No assessment made af impaGt positive I 1 ar�egative on Santa Clara residences hehind Plot 4. Page 347. Raadway Intersecfions Studied: One inter-sectian not assessed is the stop sign at Pruneridge Ave. an�Giannini prive. Thaugh a minor intersection, it has seen increasing congestion. Back-ups have reacl�ed upwards Meadow Ave.to the west.This has also 2 precipitated info driver frustration. I ha�e witnessed at least three o�casions where a frustrated matorist aggressively moves ta the front of the congestion hy maving into the center furning lane and racing farward. Though a minor intersection, it is nat�onceivable that there will be no im�ac#to that intersectian. Page 4fl1. Intersection 35. Ma�ing from a C to a C-for both L05 AM and PM seems low I 3 when�ompared ta current occupancy versus projected occupancy. Page 437- E�aluation of Parking Garage Access.The �Iorth Tantau Parking Structure was minimally addressed. Focus was on Spe�ial E�enf Traffic. No discussion of daily usage and managerr�ent of the of the 350 non-special event parking spaces. Mitigation Qf spillover 4 parking tnto nearby neighborhoads cauld potentially open up the entire s#ructure ta empfoyee parking. Needs fo be addressed. Page 454- NQise for 5T-5 Property line between Meadow Avenue and 1070a North Tantau Avenue 4.The measurement IaGatian, on the 4' herm, setback from hoth Tantau and 5 Pruneridge not a representative lo�ation to assess the noise increase that the Santa Clara residen�es on Pruneridge will experience Lett C44 Letter ID Sfl013a Name Mary Brunkhorst Address 849 Humewick Way Ci#y, State Zip 5unnyvale,CA 94D87 Email brunkharst r�aol.com 5ubject TraffclConsequences Comment I am greatly cancerned at�out the traffic irr�pacf of the proposed Apple campus.The roads araund the new carra�us simply cannat support any more traffic.The city streets and freeways near the campus were not designed to handle the Eevel af traffc that is prQposed. The Environmental Impact Report clearly indicates the negati�e impaci the Apple Campus 1 wauld have.5evera! prflpasals are out[ined in the �1R. E�en if al!of the proposals to fx the raads were campleted�efare the Apple campus opens,certain intersections will still operate at an unacceptable level. If th�praposals are not implemented,the consequences ta users af the roads will be se�ere. CurrenUProje�ted Traffic: Near the current Apple campus Qn De Anza Boulevard,tra�c backs up antfl I-280 and at the�e Anza Baulevardllnfinite Laop intersection at the enfrance to the Apple Hsadquarters. I-28D has multiple exit lanes that Eead to De Anza 6aulevard and help accommodate the Apple traffic. ❑e Anza Boufevard can barely handle the traffic entering onto Infinite Laap. 2 At the new�ampus, I-28a dnes npt have the bandwidth ta han�le muftiple exits onto Wolfe Road. The exit lane is also tao shart ta allow a backup onta the ireeway.Wolfe Road is simply taa narrnw ta handle more traffic. Traffic currently�acks up on WoEfe Raad during carnmute hours,which is at capacity. 5u�nyvale Impact: 5unnyvafe,which shares the Walfe RoadlHorr�estead Road intersecfion with Cupertino,will be greatly afFected, Wolfe RQad and Hamestead Raad will see signifcant in�reases in 3 traffi�. Traffic along WoEfe Raad is already�eavy during commute hours as dri�ers head to pr from I-280. Neighborhood Intrusion: The E1R mentlons that commuters migh#use neighbQrhood streets to access the praject site.The EEf�does not mentian#hat cammuters will use neighbarhoocf streets ta avoid the traffi�caus�d by the project site.Comrr�uters trying to avoid the Wolfe RaadlNamestead 4 Road nr WQlfe Roadll-28a traffic cauld turn onta Dartshire Way,ar Inverness Way in Sunn}n�afe as they tra�el south on Wolfe Road.They could then a��ess I-28�via Qe AnZa Boule�ard,hut would da so an neighhorhaod streets. Pedestrian lmpact: Adding lanes and light interchanges will increase the delay fimes at lights. Pedestrian crossings can greatly increase delay time at an intersection. Has the EIR cansidered the 5 impact pedestrian traffic will have an the light timing? Pruneridge Avenue: Clasure of Pruneridge A�enue is also a concern. This road is used regularly to access Tantau, Lawrence Expressway, and the shppping areas Qf Vallco and GupertinQ Village. It 6 fs alsa pra�ides access to housing. Closure of this raad will simply increase traffi�on the surrounding roads, and may affect lacaf businesses. �ther�e�elopmen#Projects in Cupertina: There are too many proje�ts under develo�ment in the Cupertino are near the propased 7 App�e Campus.Afl�f these will affect the trafFiG,with rnuch of the burden plaGed an nearby Lett C44 cont. cities. Has the Apple EIR fully considered the impact that each of these other projects is 7 cantrihuting ta the traffic in the area?Have some of these other projects proposed the same fixes that Appfe proposes to reduce their traffic impact? If so,the Apple proposals will COnt. not ha�e the desired effect. Changes to�toads Unlikely: The"proposed"actions to address the increased traffic cangestion da not seem feasible. These proposals require that several transportation agencies be in�olved. �aes Apple have the authority to modify freeway ramps?E�en if Appie pays for the changes, how long will $ the EIR and required safety studies take before construction starts?When would the reporfs and the�onstruction be campleted?And have the traffic impacts of the actual construction pracess for these road changes been cansidered in the E]R? Consequences? It seems unlikely t€�at the praposals would a�#uaily be implemented, given the c�mplexity and hacklog of roadway proje�ts in the state. What is the rec,flurse if fhis projecf is appro�ed based on the hypotheti�al completion of 9 propasals that may never actually be implemented?What happens to Apple and Cupertino if this proje�t moves fonvard without�ompleting the ehanges needed to address the traffic issues? Alternati�es: �f the Alternatives presented,the"Pruneridge Avenue Alternative"would be preferred, as it 10 wauld keep Pruneridge A�enue open. 5u mma ry: If seems that e�en if all of the"propasals"ta fix the raads were fuEly campleted before the Apple campus opens, certain intersections will still operate at an unacceptable le�el. I 11 The incon�enience to the community,to neighboring cities, to other cflmmuters,to local residents, and to lo�al businesses cannot be justified. It is simply irresponsible to cantinue I 12 to de�elop areas that are at or beyond capaciry. Thank you. Lett C45 Letter I❑ 500129 Name NanGy Wagner Address 3894 Pruneridge Ave City,5tate Zip Santa Clara, CA 95�51 Email nan�ymba99@yahoo.com 5ubject Puhlic comments on Apple Campus Comt'nent We are original owners af the hame at the end af Pruneridge in 5anta C1ara. �ur backyard borders Cupertino and Apple's property east af Tantau.Our family has li�ed in this house for 54 years.We have wel�omed Apple as good neig�bors,and have heen working with Eric Morley tram Apple on our cancerns. 5o far, Eric has warked�ery hard to create a 1 beautiful iandscaping�ision and a sound barrier wall at our border with the Apple property. ❑ur�oncerns at this point are#he fo[lowing: 1.7raf#ic. Since Apple has moved in, traffic has in�reased no#only in volume and speed af vehi�les,but alsv in size of�ehicles,whi�h includes very large buses and truGks.7he new bus traific is especially bofhersome because they are loud. With the proposed increase in 2 number of Apple employees projected to use the new campus,we really don't know haw we are going ta pull aut af our dri�eway to get to work e�ery day.We feel like Pruneridge is turning inta Lawren�e Expwy. 2.Ths Obser�ation Ci�cle at Tantaul Pruneridge is the designated paint where the rest of the warld will be able to take a look a#the Apple campus.This wfll further increase I 3 unwanted traffic. 3. Parking in front of our horr�e.We currently{between passing cars}Iook out at aur friends homes across the street-beautiful flowers and �ig trees.We don't want to look at parked �ars.We fear this will only get warse.Alt�ough minor at this point, folks are using the sign 4 in front of our horne as a waiting paint far heing pi�ked up.We now pi�k up little pieces of trash daily. 4. Proposed height of#he huildings east of Tantau.Tf�e proposed huildings are appraximately 50°Ia higher than the current buildings.We [ook at these buikdings daiiy as 5 they border our praperty.We prefer to look at sky rathsr than buiidings. The height of these buildings shouEd not be allowed to be higher than they are currently. We lo�e and welcome progress. It's what this country is all about, and we feel honored to have Appfe as aur neighbor. Really,we are an the same page. Howe�er, this is a residential neighborhaod, and it's a!I abaut quality of life for my 93 year old mom, my 6 daughter and myseif.We will remain in�ol�ed with this project with quality af life as our primary missian and feel confident Apple will too. Peopie first. Lett C46 Letter I❑ SOfl128 Name Sally Everett-Beaupre Address 1662 Grosheak A�e City,5tate Zip Sunnyvale,CA 94�87 Email s.e.beaupre@com�ast.net Subject Apple 2 campus cancerns Cornment 1 attended an informatioaln meeting of the 5unnyvale City Councif chambers two weeks ago,and would like to ac#d fwo more cancerns to fhose 1 expressed in my previous 1 comment form. (Those concerns were abQUt the traffic impact on 5unnyvale residents and the change ta the�haracter af aur residential area.J. Two more issues brought up af the I 2 meeting were: 1}that the huilding's lighting may create a large amount of gfare.{I would he �ery upset if there is a constant glow, making the night skies e�en less dark than they are now;that would be major pollution!}. 2} I alsQ wondered just haw high a 4 s#ory building that I 3 is on a 20-foot high earthen rise will appear to us.. Lett C47 Letter IO 5�0127 Narne Patrick Waddell Address 3Q79 Art�ur Gt City,5tate Zip Santa Clara, CA Santa Clara Emaii pat.waddell�smythwad.best.wvh.net 5u#�ject Apple's pianned closure af Prur�eridge A�enue Camment Apple's p�anned closure of Pruneridge Avenue will have major negative impact on Southwest Santa Clara If the proposed closure af Pruneridge Avenue is perrrzitted, it will force 5anta Clara residents,who currently can access Interstate�80 Northbound at Wolfe Raad to use the already o�ercrowded onramp at Ste�ens Creek Bl�d. The leve! af congestian during 1 commute hours is already on the verge af gridlock. Closing Pruneridge is likely to push it into gridlock. The DEIR glibly expecfs residents to take a nan-intuitive detour via Vallca Parltway, which also feeds into�ongestion on Northbound Woife. Neither alternative is a�tuafly 2 realisti�for residents. Further,for bicyclists, the Tanta�Avenue overpass over Interstate 28� is quite steep and a formidable challenge to casual hike riders. Pruneridge is, and has heen, a surprisfngly cangestian-free raute far the over 30 years we I 3 have lived in our residence in 5anta Cfara. Suggested alternati�es: The DEIR prvvides twv alternative plans aRd dismisses each withvut much thaught. I 4 Both should he reconsidered, along with a third which I would suggest. The"Pruneridge Avenue Tunnel alternative"is dismissed due ta the need ta relocate the 27 inch sewer kine, yet the propased pfan must do that as well. 5o that shauld not be the 5 deciding fa�tor. The"Pruneridge A�enue alterna#i�e"couEd be built without irnpact to the planned buildings by simply curving Pruneridge to the South, once the existing huildings ha�e 6 been removed. The employee entrances currently planned an Woife could also be maintained, leaving less of a security issue alvng Pruneridge. I would suggest a third passible alternative--a variant on the"Pruneridge Avenue alternative" but with Pruneridge being placed in a shallaw cut{15 ta 20 feet deep at maximum), with wide terra�es an either side, permitting fen�ing to he placed embeddecf � in the landscaping �and might he two sets of fences for extra se�urity}. Apple employees would be able to pass overhead at almost grade levef.Apple infrastru�#ure woufd also he able to pass v�erhead.Apple employee entrances should remain as planned in the DEIR. Lett C48 Letter ID 500126 Name IJafe Porter Address 5069 Rio Vista Ave City,5tate Zip San Jose,CA 5an Jase Email pegretl@comcast.�et Suhject 5tate of the Art Homeless Transition Center Camment fn�onjunction with this elegant, massive proje�t,Appfe,in conjun�tian with the City of Cupertino,5anta Clara County and the 5tate af California, should be required to construct and maintain a state of the art Homeless Transitian Center Ehat can serve as a working model for a�enter that will provide the following for hvmeiess peaple in the United States. This project will include: restrooms to include bathing fa�ilities,fresh water sources throughout the projeCt, a�egetable garden capable of pro�iding fresh,arganic�egetables #vr the residents as well as a sales outfet ar the puhlic,recreation area fvr children,a forum for pu61i�presentations on homeless and homeless transition issues,a lihrary and a career 1 developinent and job skills training#acility.The skills training�omponent will focus on preparing participants far employment at Appis as well as the�omputer and ofher high #echnology industry in general.This project is only to be a micro�osm of future projects to address the rapidly growing phenomena of homelessness in this country and will provide #or a living space for five-hundred persons.A s�ale model exhibit will be ko�ated on the Apple Campus 2 and the actual site will be canstructed in Santa Clara County.Also,please leave Pruneridge as it is. Lett C49 Letter ID 500125 Name Address City,5tate Zip ,CA Email 5ubject pruneridge a�e and campus ac�ess Comment 1.i feel that ta�Cing away mosf of prune ridge a�e.is not a good decision because many people who li�e ate the Harrtptvns apartments use it to go to worl�and school.the rear entrance to the hampfans is used a lot instead af the#rant way hecause it is closer to Ehe 1 elementary and middle schaols.kids wha bike tv school will not be able tv ga onto tantau to go ta s�hoal. instead they will have ta go through the high traffic af wolfe,which far ma�y children is dangerous. 2.will apple lea�e its campus open to visitors? -from what i have seen,the new campus wiil have a Iot of plants and trees,like a park.will I 2 people be allowed to visit? Lett C50 Letter IO 500124 Name A Lo�al Address City,State Zip 5ilicon Valley, CA Email Subject Green means LEEa certified Camment There are many suggestions that this proje�t is going to�e"green", but these appear to�e assumptions on many peoples'part rather than any full�ammitment. I did nnt see anywhere where Apple has commited to build a LEEa certified{preferable Platinum} 1 building. LEE�is the only standard to judge whether a building is"green". So will Apple publically�orrtmit to maicing this building LEED certified at the highest level'? AIsQ, remind the many residents who comment about the open spa�es,tr�es, and such-- that these environmental attrihutes are for Apple employees�NLY.The�ubEic will not be allowed#o enjoy these features behind the perimeter security fen�ing. Leaving Pruneridge 2 Avenue apen far the publiG is apparentEy too dangeraus for security,thus enjoying the park- [ike satting will be una�ailable to the a�erage Cupertino reside�t also(except eiected afficials perhaps}. Lett C51 Letter ID 5Dfl 123 Name Ruth Moore Address City,5tate Z�p Cupertino, CA Cupertino Email ruthcmo@aol.com Suhject Apple Campus 2 Camment The Ap�le Campus 2 concep#was�anceived in Cupertino, Califarnia and born in#he Unifed States of America by bripiant, inventive, futuristic,#alented engineers and�reati�e artists. Steve Jobs was a man af deep thought and action. I find i#hard to helieve that the pfans fhat he made for this fanfastic corporate building, his dream, are lacking in the necessary detail,which presently seems to be placing a hoEd on the procedure to build. All surrounding Silicon Valiey cities will prosper from this extremely�aluable idea.Apple is the corporation with the ability to introduce the forward ways for all ta succeed. It was proven many years ago when Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs pushed ta force the then high ranking technical r.orporations to think about the personal computer. Many of them laughed and said"Not in your lifetime."Look what happened.And look at how many followed Apple's lead. Sorne e�en "borrowed"Apple's in�entions. Most people who are agreeable to#he plans usually do not say mu�h; however,the protesters wi11 and are vaicing their oppasition.The halance comes in the importan�e and need of all comments and feelings suggested to be analyzed. For example: Traffic-Yes, as Vallco 5hopping Center will also fun�tion,as Valley Fair has. 1 Environment-This plan has trees, �lossams, parks, walkways,open spaces, etc. People-Jobs and great ecanomy,shopping and living areas. Many future plans bring fraffkc, environrnental questians,and people, such as Shapping Malls,Theaters, Stadiums,Tourist 5ights, Museums, Flea Markets, Farmers Marlcets, and many flther things hring people tQ an area. I am proud to think that many would came ta Cupertina for#he newest, most beautiful and interestAng Te�h Company in this ama�ing vailey. This is the future. I rememher being amazed at Disney Land's General Electric Theatre which showed all the future plans. No one cau€d heiieve it. Could it be possible for us to passes such innovative ideas, from homes with ultra modern appliances tQ 6 lane freeways ribboning the lands�ape? In 1962 Stevens Creek was a three lane road with blossams all around. We welcomed schools, roads, stores, banks,churches, businesses, and the population grew. This Apple Campus 2, a beautiful Future s#ructure, is the lcing on Cupertino's Cake. Let us all light the candles of celebration as this is a very special honar for the whole vafley. Thank you, Ruth Moore Cupertina resident since 1962 Lett C52 Lefter I❑ 5ao�zz Name Han+ey Checkman Address City,State Zip Cupertino, CA 95014 Email hcheckman@ieee.org Subje�t Puhlic Comments on AppleCampus 2DEfR Comment My interpretation af the fransporta#ian issues frQm the EIR seems ta be limi#ed in solutions and mitigatian. Howe�er, ane solution that wauld definitely aid bath Apple and the Cupertino area in adding 10,�Q0 plus employees fo the area is not�a�ating Pruneridge A�enue,While the new Apple Campus is not in direct conFli�t with current raute. In a major emergebct Pruneridge is a critical route from West Cupertinal5unnyvale ta#he Kaiser Medical Center where major 1 disaster plans are implemented for major emergencies. Eliminating an important throughfare with 5 lanes of auto tra�c[a center lane}plus wide bike lanes. plus adding the 10,Q�a additional employees will only contribute to gridlock ta the entire area. �ne alternative proposal to reroute Pruneridge to the south adjacent to 28D. Envision gaing East ta West and reroute the puhlic route to the left route to the Ridge View Court and around ta the Ffamptan Apartments on the West ta Wolfe Road. Not only would the city not lose a major artery, hut it coufd enhan�e the quality of life for both Appfe employees and the residents, mitigate auto traffic, bike lanes ,and pedestrians . Since the area of near 28� 2 is envisianed far a park like setting this area could�e shared by everyane. iVarth of Pruneridge wouEd be the Apple 5ecure Campus with fencing and all the security. 5uch a saEutian resol�es a list of problems in�lujding not�acating right of way by city, maintain a pratecti�e perimeter for Apple, protecting wild life ar�d access to the creek, nat eliminating traffc lanes, etc. The TDM and 5h�ttle and hus programs need ta he expanded as traffi�increases. Mifigation should lnclude stifling Apple employee growth if problems are nat sol�ed.Whiie trip cap is desired a peak trip cap might be quantified and enforced until solutions are 3 implemented.After the fact problern sol�ing will he much more iimiting. Sett mile stones with required actian. Transportation for SeniQrs . 5ince the grawing senior papulation has greater transpQrtation I needs including medical visits. A door to door shuttle should be implemented ta help senior 4 get to the Kaiser facilities. Another mitigatian suggestion for bath transporation demands and quality of life is to�ire localiy.Cupertino, 5unny�+ale,Santa Clara are ian incredibly educated and,talent population . By promoting very Iocal hiring, ,the traffic demands could lesse�with Apple 5 door-to-doar shuttles. Far each position filled by a residen#,Apple would recei�e a�redit. The new residences on Vallco Parkway is a case in point. Hiring currsnt lacal residents reduces commute times far the entire area. A qualify of life issue for 5unnyvale and Cupertino residents is the current praposals simply degrades the qualify of life with ali the EIR factors ta cansider. 5chools, parks, law enforcement, and ease of life are impacted by the new Appie Campus. Prapose using a 6 ribbon of land south of 28D for public access. See my Pruneridge rerouiting proposal. Lett C53 l.et#er Ip 5��121 Name Ann Address City,5tate Zip , CA Email Suhject Hospital Impact 1 Cupertino HS Impa�t Corttment The draft EfR indicates that during operational and r.onstruction periods the fa�ility�ould vialate air quality standards.What does that impact faok to the vulnerable population that inrould be at Kaiser Hospital.Which way would pre�ailing winds blow that excess emissian, 1 i.e.toward the Hospital ar towards Cupertino High School or tawards 8irdland or Portal neighborhoods?How frequently during operatian would this occur? Another questian that needs to he answered is what is the additional time delay for a vehlcle traveiing to the Kaiser Fiospital Emerge�cy Room at peak travel hours?Already Homestead frequently experiences gridfock.What wouEd be the extra time required to arrive 2 at Kaiser starting from the intersection of Hamestead111ollenbeck?What would be the extra #ime required star#ing from Wolfellris?These inquiries should be modeled expliGitly. As Santa Clara residents are forced ta travel up Tantau{due to the pfanned clasure of 3 Pruneridge}in order tv get ta 28a a�d vther areas af Cu�ertino, hvw will this increase traffc near the Cupertina High School at the critical morning peak haurslstart of school? LetterlD S�Q120 Lett Alame Ann C54 Address City,State Zip , CA Email Subject Closure of Pruneridge Comment The p€an proposes removal of a section of Pruneridge Avenus.This is propased despite the fa�t that it directly�ontradicts elements of Cupertino's General Plan �y eliminating bike and pedestrian access along Pruneridge. Instead bicyclist and pedestrians will be forced on to 1 the busier Homestead Road anci possible even to the Sunny�ale side of Hamestead, adding to the congestion. The text suggest that Apples'security requirements are 5�great that bicyclist and pedestrians�annot be alEowed on the grounds—though the only fa�ilities south of the farmer raad will be parking and power generation facilities.{And eve�thaugh curr�nt Apple 2 facili#ies in Cupertina dv not have this type of perimeter.}And the dEIR cafls it unmitigatible, but w�y? Mitigation idea: l see a failure af creative thinking far which Apple is in theary known for.A tunnel cannot be built due to a sewer line, but why nat a fly-o�er bicyclelpedestrian bridge be built reconnecting one end of Pruneridge tq the o#her7 Such a passage way r.ould be fenced and secured to meet the security paranoi. The bridge cnuld also�e a public piece of artwork with the right design firm. The new Apple building is to be grand enaugh ta attract 3 ar�Faitectura!tourist and such a pedestrian bridge would provide a se�ure�iewing area for students of architecture.App[e could work with BAAQM�'s bicycle fa�ility prograrn to develop appropriate designs and since the bridge would traverse open land instead of a roadway, its construction should be simpler.This would greatly impro�e non-car accessihiliry in the area and imprave alignment with Cupertino's General Plan. Lett C55 LetterlQ 5flfl118 Name Pingang Wang Address 481 Norwood Cir City,State Zip 5anta Clara, CA 95051 Email pingang_wang�7u yahoo_com 5uhject Traffic at PruneridgelLawrence intersection Comment Hello, We are residents of En�lave at Santa Clara. Our cammunity is IoGated on Pruneridge A�e near Lawrence Expy. This intersection is already crowded during traffi�hours. We are concerned about extra traffic that the new Apple campus will bring in. 1 Is there a plan to ease potential traKc�ongestion at that{PrunerldgelLawrence} intersecfion? We didn't see such a proposal in the materials submitted by Apple. Best regards, Pingang&Wen Wang Letter ID 50Q117 Name Jeremy Huhble Lett Address 869 Hefena C56 Ci#y,5tate zip 5unnyvale,CA 5unnyvale Email jghubble r�gmail.com Sub�e�t Homestead and Pruneridge Comment 1}Homestead.5ome sections of Homestead currently have part time bike lanes. With the�ompletian of the new campus, bath car and bike trafFic wi�l likely increase or� Homestead. Thts will pose a safety hazard for bi�ycfists, espe�ially since some portions of the bike lanes 1 allow parking during evening rush hour. Cupertino should work with the city of Sunnyva3e to make sure that the bike lanes are full time(with na parking allowed}before the project is r.omplete. 2}Pruneridge. Pruneridge�urrently pra�ides direct acc�ss to the Cupertino Village shapping center.With th�closure of pruneridge, mu�h af the traffic from Pruneridge will likely be diverted ta Homestead. 2 This will create additional bicyclelautomobile comfiicts, especially on weekends when the shopping center is very busy and many�yciists are r[ding on Homestead. 5ome actions s�ould be made to mitigate this. 3}Pruneridge bicycle access.Currentky Pruneridge provides hicyc[e access connec#ing Cuperino Village and the nearhy residential neighbarhood to many points east�including a nice bike route to downtown 5an.�ose.} The current Apple campus plans cauld easily accomodate a bike path connecting Cupertina Village and Pruneridge through the Apple�ampus. 3 This wo�ld mesh well with the green nature of the Campus. It woufd also would maintain the existing cannectivity. The current [nfinite Loop campus has a public trail that connects the car►�pus to the residential neighborhood and Lawson Middle school. I#is important that fhe new campus maintain the bi�ycle connectivity. ❑one right,this cauld enhar��e the campus#ar bath Apple and the community. Lett C57 Letter I� 5aD114 Name Vincent Grande Address 1127 Lachin�ar A�e City,5tate Zip Sunnyvafe,CA 9408? Email vinniegrande�sbcgfobal.net Suhject EVew On and�ff Ramp at Tantau Comment As a 5�nnyvale Birdland Resident, I have mixed feelings on this project. �bviausly,the increased traff�congestion will and should be a priority of Apple to address. I 1 My suggestion is tfl create the Ste�e Jobs Rd�xit at Hwy 280.Where Tantau o�erpass is, huild create an on ramp and off ramp that wl[E feed nicely into Apple FiQ and the other subsidiary building on Tantua. 2 Has this idea been addressed?I think Apple and the Ciry of Cupertino owes it to the residents who wilf be most impacted. Regards, Vincent Grande Lett C58 Letter ID 500�13 Name Address City,S#ate Zip Sunnyvale,CA 94086 Email Subject TrafFic? Comment I think this lo�ation is going to cause a signif�ant amount of trafF�congestion.Wolf already gets pr�tty ha�ked up araund carr�muting times and with this campus I can just see it getting much much worse. For thase of us that actually live by this Iocation and use 1 Wo141Hamestead fvr dai€y�ommuting around tawn, I think it will be a headache. Lett C59 Letter ID 5flfl108 Name C3a�id Mooso Address 528 Hubbard Ave City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara,CA Email Subject Noise levels along Pru�eridge A�e Camment I IOaked at#he naise le�ef study. it ap�ears Pruneridge A�e between Tantau and LBwrenc� Expressway has been left out of the study. I admit I may have missed it,but if I am correct 1 then it seems that that should be part of the study he�ause there most likely will be an impact on traffic and noise when the campus is built. Lett C60 Letter I� 5DD107 Name Art Cahen Address 21275 5te�ens Creek Bl�d City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA Cupertino Email alouis7�a gmaiE.cam Subject Apple Campus 2 Comment Gi�en the national prominen�e and spo#light of the de�elopment of the new Ap�le Campus 2,what new se�urity enhancements are being recammended far the City of Cupertina? My interesf is that of a business owner in Cupertino{Bluelight Cinemas]and resident of Cupertino, living just Z-3 miles from the new Apple Campus. I believe that the new Apple �ampus will thrust Cupertino City with new internatiorral fame that it may be an attracfive national target{like New Yark,etc. }. Has there been any allocation af funds by the City of Cupertino or Apple to install a City-wide publi�se�urity camera system tsimilar to what they 1 have in London or was in Bostan}.��erall I suppart the building of the new Apple Campus 2 and believe it to be a pasitive asset fvr the City of Cupertina and the Bay Area.The Ciry af Cupertino is one of the safest and secure clties in the 6ay .Promoting the Gity of Cupertino having an essential city-wide securiry system wiil�ie an asset to the City af Cupertino and to that of Apple, Inc.5ince Apple is in-part bringing the international attention to the City of Cupertin❑ ,I�ope that in the huilding of the new Apple Campus, there could he allocation of funds to wprk with the City to build a camera security system fpr all af Cupertino. Lett C61 Letter IO �oa�os Name Denia Phillips Address Corporate inn 5unnyvale, 8fl5 E E]Camino Real City,State Zip Sunny�ale,CA Sunnyvale �mail denia@cQrpinn.cQm 5ubject Praject support-Birdland Traffic Concems Comment As the General Manager of a 5unnyvale Hotel, Corpora#e Inn Sunny�ale, I attended a public meeting at the 5unnyvale Caun�if Chambers an�uesday,July 10,2�13.Tt�e area of concern was trafFic in the 8irdland resi�ential area and Wolfe Road.After reading the in'Formation pro�lded and listening to the o�erview of traffic mitigation plans, it appears that Apple is more than adequately addressing the areas vf concern.�ur community stands to 1 gain sa much fram this proje�t; increased revenue to businesses and local government, increased home values and improved schov4s. ldealEy, 5unny�ale would recei�e the sarr�e benefits that Cupertino has enjoyed by having Apple in their community.This is an exciting oppartun[ty for 5unnyvale to support it's husinesses and residents. Lett Letter ID 500105 C62 Name JAMES Address Gity,State Zip , CA Email XC�LLERP,NT10 cG"bGMAIL.CaM 5ubject Impact Study Incomplete Comment The issue of haw a circular design,while may he pleasing Qn land, may be extremely confusing to migratory flying animals.The circular tfesign would be confusing these species because fram the sky it would appear as a body of wafer.This w+ould disrupt the flying pa#tern which could have a negafive dawnstream ef#ect on their feeding, mating, and overall survival. Circular designs are typi�ally not a prablem for�nigratorylflying animals but one af this scale is unprecedented anci under studied. This could also be a nuisance to fhe tawn as there coul�be a surplus of full time birds that hame near this area causing excessive bird fe�es, naise, and disruption of local ecosystem. 1 It is also nateworthy that airports avoid�ir�ular design like this.Why? Because of it's effect on flyinglmigratory animals.Althaugh the enviranmental study does mentian this, it is not at all conclusive. I would suggest Iooking at the impact in regards to o#species protected by fhe Migratory Bird Trea#y Act as well as the Endangered Spe�ies A�t{E5A}. it wauld he a shame if the story of the Cafifornia Condar be repeated when it can he completely prevented. http:llwww.f+,vs.govlmigratorybirdslregulationspolicieslmhtalcompare.pdf Lett C63 LetterlQ 50a1fl4 Name John Kilmer Address 380 pruneridge ave City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara, CA 95051 Email Jkiimer@gmail.�om 5uhject Clvsure of Tantau Comment I think that Apple is�ery short sighted in planning to close tantau to the hamptons to gain security?The traffc impact ta the area will be quite signifi�anf. I far ane will add a gaod 15- 20 mins onto my commute to go around this inane roadhlock. This makes a absaiutely no sense and will result in�ery angry neigbors to a new spaceship 1 in the�ommunity. I have nat seen 4ne EIR traffic impact study araund this and this will also hamper pallcelfire and ambulance response times. 5peaking for my neighbors this is an aweful idea to se�ure or�ly one side of the praposed castle and I'm completely against i#. John Lett Letter ID 5fl�103 C64 Name Elaine Manley Address 1fl75 Hamshire Ct City,State Zip Sunny�ale,CA 9A087 Email elaine.manley�a camcast.net Subje�t 3 suggestions Comment I am very exciEed abaut the new campus t�at is being buill near our home. I'�e listened to several presentations and I think yau've done a tremendaus job. I ask that you please 1 consicler three things: 1. More parking on your siie: Please increase your parking by another 7flfl to 1,��0 spaces.While it's goad to incenti�ize the employees to take pu�lic transit, iYs also importa�t to have enaugh facil€ties to make it convenient for them. It is much cheaper to build more parking now than ta try to add to it later. Parking for visitars are included in 2 this figure.You are creaTing one of the coalest buildings on th�p�anet. People wifl want to come and see it. If yau plan for enough parking far the�isitors,then it's not a headache foranyone. 2. Homestead:PEease do N�T put a median along Homestead.We can palnt the street and make it look�etter but it's much better to have easier a�cess to turn into the homes and sEreets along Hamestead. Please don'f create more times a person has ta u-turn. 3 Function is much more important than a small median for aestheti�s. Paving and painting the ciear lines an ihe street will be much more valuable and safer. 3. Height of yaur berms:ln tha Sunnyvale City Council pre-session, it sounded like your berms would be s❑ high we�auldn't see your building.You are�reating something people want Ea see sa please don't hide it. 1 know there is con�ern abaut glare but that can be handled with Fhe type af materEal you put on the building.The design looks 4 spe�tacular.Share it with tY�ose of us driving by it. I love beautiful�uildings. ii brings the eniire area up. Sa please dan't make the berms toa high nor the trees so thick that we can't see your gorgeous building. Please make sure iYs visible. Thank you(ar�onsidering these suggestions. I look farward to having you as a neighbor. I 5 Sincerely, �laine Manley Lett C65 Letter ID 50Q1fl2 Name Andy Frazer Address 1524 Nightingale Ave City,5tate Zlp 5unnyvale,CA 94087 Emafl andyfrazerforcouncil@gorillasites.com Subject Parking intrusion in Sunny�ale Comtnent f am concerned about the possible parking intrusion from the Apple�ampus into the Birdland neighborhood af 5unnyvale. Page 434 of the QEIR speciticalEy mentions There are several areas in the immediate�icinity of the project site where emplayees could attempt to park if propased on-site parking facilities do nai fully meet proje�t-related parking demand or pro�e to be too incanvenient.These areas include: Nightkngale Avenue,Meadowlark Lane,and Leighton Way north af Homestead Road. 1 This is where I live. I collected responses from six residents of these three streets,whi�h I have included below. App]e needs to da everyth€ng possible ta redu�e traffi�congestion in the area of Wolfe and Homestead,and to discourage employee parking outside the campus. If it turns out 5ur�ny�ale needs to implement either residential permit parking or traffic or parking mitigation in Birdland,AppEe needs to absorb the entire cosf of if. Thankyou Andy Frazer 1624 Nightingale Ave andyfrazerforcouncil@gmail.�om ---------------------------------------------------Birdland residents' feedback---------------------------- {1 af 6} Yair Barniv July 4,2�13 ❑ear Andy Frazer and the 5unnyvale Coun�il, I STR�NGLY oUject to Apple's plans related to my 5unny�afe neighbarhoad!!! !don't want them to canvert my quiei 5unnyvale residential area into---effectively---an lndustrial area! Playing with words isn't going to change reality. 1 chose to live in a RE5I�ENTIAL area---not an IN�LISTRIAL one! 2 !can only guess that the City of Sunnyvaie will be making some money out af that"deal", �ut I don't foresee ANY reductian in my own Sunnyvale's outrageaus bills (water, garbage,sewer,etc.}. I MUCH prefer that the City cuts its expenses and retirement �enefits instead. My n�ighborhaod daes N�T require any additianal"developmenf';it's getting worse all on its own already. Truly yours, Yair Barniv, 152fi Meadowlark Ln, 5ur�nyvale Lett C65 cont. (2 of 5} Carol Absalam July 3,�0�3 Hi Andy... 1 live on Nightingale and recei�ed your flyer.l am VERY much agair�st this pedestrian 3 access across Homestead to Nightingale and would like to know what I can do about it. Thanks Carol {3 af 6J Wang, Pearl July 3,20�3 Andy— Thanks for handing out the Apple Campus 2 environment impact reports. I'm your neighbor at 9Q8 Inverness. It's very much a concern that some AppEe err�ployees may attempt to park around the neighbarhood. Is there anything Apple is doing to assure they 4 will achie�e the 34°Io TDM participation rate? ❑uring rush hours,traffic is already�ery bad on Wolf around HomesFead&Inverness, the Apple proje�t will certainEy make it worse.We shouldn't need to put up with the parking prablems too. Pearl Wang In�erness Ave {4 of fi} Kevin Klenk, June 31 ��erall, 1 support the Apple project, but I have serious con�ernslreservations w.r.#.the traffic impact. i had pre�iously submitted a comment on-line {hrip:lla�2eir.commentmanagement.�amllisUview.cfm?f=2&w=1&1=500029}in this fight. 5ubsequently, I spent several haurs looking through the Enviranmental Impact�teport 5 {http:llwww.cupertino.orglindex.aspx?page=i 178}which mostly addrasses my can�erns. 1 say mostly,because nowhere was I able t�see a pian ta further correctladjusT the 2801Wo{fe and 2801Lawrence interchanges if{or when]the documented measures prave inadeq uate. I seem to re�all a re�ent Birdland alias post stating that$S��K wi[!be set aside ta do past -project traffic assessments and control measures on the Sunny�ale side of Homestead. While this is�ertainly encouraging, I don't have any way to judge how mu�h is achievable 6 with this amount of rr�oney, nor does it address the bigger con�ern of helping traffing tolfromlthrough the main traffi�arteries of 280.Wolfe,and Lawrence. 5o in summary,my qusstion to present ta the 5unnyvale City Council and pass on ta CupertinolApple is:To what exient is Apple willing to suppor#post-project road 7 impravements to the main traific arteries af 280,Wo€fe,and�awrence iflwhen the praposed plan proves inadequate? �espe�tfully sut�mitted, Kevin Klenk 7-year Birdland residen# Lett C66 From: Indranil das 5ent: Monday, J�aly4, 2413 5u�je�t: Rpple Camptas - Birdland neigh�orhood Hello Cauncil mem3�ers: I am a resident of t}�e girdland Neighborhood& although I am happy about the new I 1 icanic campus that Apple is bldg, I am concerned about a few things: 1. Increased traffi�on Wolfe and Homestead. I 2 2. Residential neighborhood parking spots in front oi our home will be more freq usecl... which wifl be not only in�on�enient hut environmentally unsafe for us. -- prime spots in fronf of our hauses 3 -- unknown�ehicles parked -- blind spots while�acking up creating hazards, accidents. -- speeding issues specially on iVightinagle & MeadowEark Lanes. 3. Noise and Air pollution etc. -- I know AppEe encourages Publi�Trans�ort, Carpools, Buses, 8ikes...we hope with I 12000+ emp�oyees they take adequate rneasures to o�ercome the frafficlairinoise 4 prok�Eem. Here are suggestions: 1. Apple should N�T open a Peoplel8ikelAutomo�ile entrance ❑n Homestead Road. This will deter Ap�le workforce to�ark in Birdland neighborhood and a�oid congestion on 5 Hamestead. Apple may only ha�e an emergency exit on Hornestead. 2. Similar s�ggestion on WoEfe road too because there would literally be n❑ roarr�for I 6 traf[i�to enterlexit 280 NIS d�ring peak hrs. 3. Some kind of Appra�ed& Controfled parking stickers issued far Birdland residents only to park in our neighborhaod spots during peak hrs. between M-�. � -- everyo�e else �an park for maximum 1 hr or so wit�o�af a sticker. -- traffic patrolling carts will be reqd in that case. We need to strike the right balance between the two. I g Help appreciate�i. Thanks, Birclland Neighbar Lett C67 Letter ID 5001 Q1 Name Michelle Philips Address i 578 Driole A�e City, 5tate Zip Sunny�ale, CA 94D87 Emafl miGhelle�7hilips@yaho�.cam Subject Comments on DEIR �I live in 5unnyvale} Comment Cupertina City Cauncil, My name is Michelle Philfp5 and I live an Qriqle Avenue in Sunnyvale, a few bloCkS fr�m the proposed Apple Campus. Aithaugh my street is nat named in the ❑EIR,the anes thaf are represer�t routes that my family dri�es each and e�ery day. ❑ur neighborhood already has experience in this area with the Kaiser left t�rn situation, and I ha�e de#initely encountered an increase in traffic from that ane, althaugh we were told it would not ai#ect 6irdland. Thus I am very cancerned about the potential for what 1 Apple's plans will bring to us, as I ha�e read in the DEfR about parking on our streets if proposed onsite fa�ilities are deemed inconvenient to employees, and they choase to use Birdland as a workaround.7he projected pedestrian access p�int is also worrisome, as it wauld cerfainly encaurage this�ehaviar. Hewle#t-PaCkard's presence in our neighborho�d was minimal to none. It is my hape that the Apple project can attain the same impact, and that aur Birdiand neighborhood will not suffer from its presence. Regards, Mi�helle Philips i 57$Qriple Avenue 5unnyvafe S i 57$�riple Avenue Lett Letter ID saoos� C68 Name Ann Address City,State Zip ,CA Email Suhject Mitigation of trafF�-suggestion Comment The employee popula#ion will be 200°/0 of the current usage of fhe site and 4�°/a higher than HP housed an the site at its peak(hefare a1!#he vther surrounding de�eEvpments occurred}. Currently,traffi�at Hamestead and Wolfe is terrible at peak hours;it 6ecomes difficult to 1 get ta Kaiser Fiospital�ia Homestead.The d�IF2 indi�ates there will be"unaccepta4[e" �onditions at five inFersections, hut la�ks creative thought on methods to mitigate some of the impact. MITIGATIaN:The Apple 2 campus and those intersections most impacted by traffic divide 5un�y�ale and 5anta Clara homes in the Cupertino lJnion 5chool District{C�S�j from the diskricf-wide(IotteryJ e4ementary sc�ovls and from middle schools in the C1150. By providing s�hoal busing of students in these areas to the apprapriate schoals,it is likely that��to 244 family vehicEes�ould be removed from WoEfe and Tantau at the peak AM traff�hour. Less tra��,less emissions, Eess gridlock. Parents who don't have to drive their �hildren to s�hool may he more inclined to get themselves tv work via other means then a single-occupancy vehicle.Also a potentia{t�enefit for Apple employees and their children in the area. At a collection point away from the neighborhood s�hool{with each ha�e their own tra�c 2 congestion},such as Panama Park in Sunnyvale,schvvl buses could take children frarn the Ortega and IVimitz ariendance areas ta the Mur�€ack-Portal, Christa McAuliffe K-8, and CLIP�,a]Meyerholtz schaols.Thus many�ehides woufd avaid the WolfelHomestead interse�tia�. In 5anta Ckara,school buses could take children to Christa McAuliffe,GLIP,and I-kyde Middle School,and thus a�oid using Tantau ta Ste�ens Creek{and reduce possibiliry of Tantau�acking up tv Homestead]. 5ince CLISQ already owns buses and employs drivers,the incremer�tal�ost to Apple ta enable this a�tivity wouEd be small,estiinate less than$15,O�D per bus per year if you look at rantal rates.A�ery reasonahfe cost on the scale of this project. Apple should imrrzediately start working with CUSD to see how to implement this and other traffi�mitigatian salutions. Lett C69 Letter ID 50Q095 Name David Mooso Address 528 Hu6hard A�e City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara,CA 95051 Email 5ubject Creek Trail Cumment If a creek Erail was installed along Casahas creek as described in the�RAFT ENVIRONfNENTAL IMPACT REP�RT,as an alternative ta a closing off Pruneridge to 1 pedestrian tra�ic we would he more inc€ined to support the praposed Apple 11 �ampus.We like walking anci running along Pruneyard. Lett C70 Letter ID 5flfl094 Name LJ P Add ress City,5tate Zip 5an Jase, CA 5an Jose Email 5uhject Unacceptable Traffic Comment No campany shouEd be aflowed to f�uild such a big campus which is surrounded by residentiaf area.Apple campus which will host up to--13,�aD employees in one focation will cause a Traffi�Nightmare for everyone using Walf road,Homestead road, L.awrence expressway. Both Wolf and Lawren�e 280 exits are sfngle fane exits to reach 280 freeway. 1 I can just faresee lang lines at these exits getting in and getting flut.Apple cannot guarantee that these exits wil] be expanded ta meet such traffic capacity.City reprasentati�es frqm Cupertino, San Jqse, 5unny�ale and 5anta Clara shauld think about their residents and oppose this new Apple campus in entirety. Lett C71 LetterlU 5flfl093 Name �avid Moosa Address 528 Hubbard Ave City,State Zip 5anta Clara,CA Santa Clara Email Suhje�t Traffic signal operatians at TantaulPruneridge Comment I see an oppartunity to imprave traffi�fEows at the TantaulPruneridge. My recommendation is that when West 6ound Pruneridge Le#t Turn{W8 LTJ has a green arrow that a North Bound Tan#au Righ#Turn{N8 RT)arrow shnuld also come on. Qo to an anticipated high 1 volume of traffic caming&going frpmlta Lawrence Expy during cflmmute haurs and in general day to day vperation of the campus. Lett C72 LetterlQ 5��92 Name Loran Stringer Address City,5tate Zip ,CA Email Suhject Traffic Cvmment �erhaps youshould be required to limit the numher of cars entering and exiting the campus. I One lane, no ba�kup allowed at the entrance,or a toll for each car after 1 say, 100�each hour. Larry Lett C73 Letter ID 5fl0091 Name Michelle Cannelly Address 291 Lowell�r City,State Zip Santa Clara,CA 95a51 Email slpmicheEl@aol.�om Subject apple campus 2 project Camment I have two prirnary concerns abou#this praject. The first ane is related to the obviaus impact this project has on traffic congestian throughout the day.This project wiil make an already conges#ed area worse all day,not just during commute.7his has not be adequately addressed in the project.They�an 1 conduct their business as it is now with the buildings they already have and build somet�ing smaller on the old HP site they pur�hased withaut needing ta�lose down a major a�cess point to 280.{referring to Pruneridge Ave.} The second,which is not mentioned in the impact report is regarcfing the second hand smoke we will all pe expased to when we are wa�king, l�iking or driving pur�ars in the area.Apple has a very strict anti-smoking policy for their employees.They require their emplQyees to walk onto publi�property where they stand in"smoking�lutches"and pollute the air.They aiso snuif out their cigarettes onto the sidewalk and lea�e them there to be washed into the gutters and eventually into the Bay. I have pictures of the employees smoking and fittering. I have reparted this problem to the City and it still cantinues.7his is what is going on right now in the temporary l�uilding lo�ations within the 2 proposed construction zane. I am very con�erned abaut the publi�health risk now and in the future.The second-hand smoke problem is bad enough wiTh the number of apple emplayees already here. If this project is approved,the number af smokers will surely increase. It is already a smoke-filled toxi�zane on Perimefer Rd.just abaut any time of day. It wil[anly get worse around the whole site.Tantau Rd. is used as a bike a��ess route for two schools �Cupertino H5 and Hyde Middle 5chool},5choo!chiEdren are riding their bikes past these muitiple smoking sites afl alang Tantau and Valco Parkway. This project is anything but environmentally friendly. I 3 Lett Letter 117 5afl�89 C74 Name 5ally Everett-eeaupre Address 1662 Grasbeak Ave Clty,5tate Zip 5unnyvale, CA 94�87 Emall Subject Concerned about impact of Apple 2 campus on 5u�ny�ale Comment I live in 5unnyvale very near the corner of Homestead and Walfe. I appreciate having recei�ed a card asking for feedback. 1 I welcome a dynami��ompany in my area; I Ehink it will hring econami�health,but I lo�e even mare the quiet and relaEive safety of the area. My questions are: 1}The Apple plans mention aver and o�er that Apple is cancerned to be a good cktizen of Cupertina. It seems#o me that Cupertino will recei�e afl the benefits of your presence and few of the prablems... the new Apple Gampus is on the Sunnyvale side of 28�and that means the traific,congestion,noise will all affect residents of 5unnyva€e e�ery day. It 2 risks to tatally ct�ange the character af our neighborhoods.Additianally,there is a lot of higher rise constructian occurring on the other side of 28a at Woife;that is going to also gaing ta impact Wolfe raad.Therefore, I would like Apple to address its impact on 5unnyvale as well. �} I cannot but dread the amount of traffic that will enter and fea�e Wolfe road all day long;there is enough already...we cannot handle 7000 peo�le there,despite yaur efforts to encaurage�usses and�iGyGles... (Yaur employees lives are too busy for that to be viable for a significant eno�gh number.}1s there a way to add an exit off the 28a freeway 3 between Lawrence and Walfe that directs your employees directiy to your parking?and back onfo the freeway afterwards?5tiil, I think Wo�fe and Lawren�e will be a nightmare coming irom the ather side of the peninsula foa... I'd appreciate any informatian that can assuage my fear of yaur impending[looming?} presen�e. I am also going ta send these concerns to the 5unnyvale City Coun�il. 4 Than{c you, Sally Everett-Beaupre 1 fi62 Grosbeak Ave. 5unnyvale, CA 94087 Lett C75 Letter IU 500060 Name Jon Ramos Address City,5tate Zlp , CA Emall 5ubject Comments on Apple's new and old campus Comment I attended the presentation tonight on the new Apple Campus P EIR (June 26th}.The only comment that cancerns me is where is the EIR report for fhe existing campus?What is Apple planning ta do with the existing building?Is the property zoned for residential or 1 business usage?When Cupartino has a rneeting regarding the Apple campus, I expect the cQnsultant ta be on time.When the public attends a mee#ing you should have the E3R consultant on time (fi:30pm}, he shauld nat show up at 6:55pm. Lett C76 Letter ID 50a�77 Name Ann Peterson Address 7573�range 6€ossom�r City,State Zip Cupertino,CA Emafl Subject Comment As a resident of Cupertino, I am particularly concerned about the many Apple buildings araund tawn and which af these wi[I be left empty. 1 I think this wiil afsa ha�e an irrtpa�t on pur City�nd the en�ironment. Lett C77 Letter I� 5Dfl067 Name Jeff Greef Address 10235 Nile Qr City,Siate Zip Gu�ertino,GA 95014 Email jg�a jeffgreefwoodworki ng.co m 5ubject Tota!carban footprint af Apple 2 campus Camment What will he the total carbon footprint for the develapment of the Apple 2 campus, in�luding; 1-Carhon from the offsite production of Portland cement for onsite concrete 2-Garbon from the affsite productior�of stru�tural SFeel for onsiie assembly 1 3-Carhon from the offsite productior�af architectural glass,incEuding bending process, for�nsite installation 4-All other release of�arbon into the atmosphere that ofherwise woufd not ha�e occurred had 1he praject not occurred 5econdly-how many years will it take before the renewable energy systems installed onsite will offset the total carbon footprint for de�elopment of the Apple 2 campus,when 2 all releases of carbon are considered which would not ha�e accurred had the project not o�cu rred? Lett C78 Letterl0 5a�05fi Name Mahesh IVihalani Address 7938 Mcclelan Rd#2 City,State Zip Gupertino,CA Gupertin❑ Email nihalanis@comcast.net Subje�t Apple Campus2 Comment I and my family,have lived in Cupertino for the past 13 years and Iove this city and its people .We strangly suppart the construction flf the new Apple Campus Cupertina is known Internationa[ly anly because ot Apple being here. The building of Apple Campus 2 is vital ta our city of Cupertino and the region as a who[e sin�e the e�onomi�impact for the community will 6e extremely positive. It will make Apple,which f am sure would be welcome with open arms by every City ,5tate and Gauntry,to continue tn remain in Cupertina and also add an estimated 7,400 new high- 1 quality jobs. Their being here will iRcrease re�enues of local businesses and support additional job growth throughout the region and alsa enhance tax re�enues ta the City af Cupertino and ❑ther ciFies and public agencies. I am alsa sure tha#Appie will work i�good faith with the Cammunity#o mitiga#e,to the extent pnssible,any adverse en�ironmenta]impacts. Lett C79 Letter IO 50D064 Name Address City,5tate Zip Sunny�ale,CA Email Su6ject ❑o nflt support this{�roject. Comment This area need more affor�able housing instead of more offi�e buildings.There are I 1 plenty of empiy office buiidings Apple can purChase and re-purpose for their needs. Lett C80 Letter IO 500083 Hame John Nelson Add ress City,State Zip ,CA �mail 5ubject Comment The raads in the area will not be able to handle the traffic. Especially the interse�tian af Wolfe and Homestead.This proje�t needs to be down sized or divided up into small 1 projects spread through out Cupertino. Lett C81 Letter IO SOOD6� IVame Charles F�ansan Address 7617 Elderwood ct City,5tate Zip Cupertina, CA Gupertina �mail �ehanson�yahao.com Subjec# Demolitian Comment The EIR should also address the demolition of the.26 HP buildings tQ ensure that the �oncrete is re�y�led on site,the glass,copper,conduit and other materiafs that can he 1 reused are recycled. Lett C82 Letter I❑ 5afl059 Name Address City,State Zip ,GA Email Subject Comment It is clear that the�ity is in Apple's back pQCket and is doing everything to ensure this campus is b�ilt!this is not a farm for publi�comrnent as the Gity Council has already made their mind up about the proje�t and wii]be voting for it.While I support a new campus,this one is horrible and doesn't fit within the structure of the city. cupertino is 1 already looked down upan by surrounding�ities with it's lack of appropriate�ity planning. this new str�cture,while bring in re�enues ta the city,wili continue to make�uperti�o laok unplanned and unstructured. Lett C83 Letter la Sa��58 Name Walter Li Address 21474 Millard Ln City,State Zfp Cupertina,CA 95��4 Email walter.li r[,'Ogmail.cam 5ubject Significant Impact? Comment The EIR states that the praject plans ta suppart 9,80Q emplpyees and has histori�ally operated near this capa�ity,even though since about Aug 20'f 1,when hackground data for this EIR were collected,only about 4844 emplayees worKed there. Fram this informatian, it seems logical to assume that since fhis site has historically been appra�ed for 9800 emplayees,why will the same site with the new propasal from Apple he assessed with"significant impact" in this EIR report? If HP's business canditions as well as 1 the econamy situation cantinue to improve ta the paint that[assuming}HP will again have 980�employees at this site,will the City of Cupertino not aIIQw it to happen7 lt seems to me that if Apple plans to have similar number flf employees at the site as i#has historically supported,what signifcant changes has this Apple project indi�ates that warrants a"signif�cant impacY'rating In td�e E1R? Lett C84 Letterl� 500054 Name Marc Aronsan Address 1�120 Westminster Ct City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA 95�14 Email rrtarcaC,3mEaronson.com 5ubject Apple Campus Comment I support the construction of the new Apple campus. ! belie�e that Apple will work in good faith with the eommunity to mitigate,to the degree possible,adverse environmental impacis.The econamic impact far the cdmmunity will be very positive. 1 I da not nor ever ha�e worked far Apple. Most flf my high-tech electranics is non-Apple equiptnent. I have no investmen#in Apple stock. I simply see this as a tremendous opportunity for the community in whi�h I have Eived for 20+years. Marc Aronsan Lett C85 Let#er ID 50afl48 Name Jennifer Martin Address 1028 Lachness Ct City,State Zip Sunnyvale,CA 5unnyvale Emai] 5uhject Traffic and Construction Cancems Comment It is clear that Wolfe RQadlHomestead and the neighboring streets wil[be se�ereiy impacted�y traffi�. It is of great concern that the Sunnyvale neight�orhood will he used as "drive around"options far both current commuters and Apple employees who wish fo bi- pass the increased levels of congestion on Woife, Fiomestead,et�.The main 5unnyvale "Thru"street, Quail, is highly used hy kids gaing to Peterson and Laurelwood schaols, 1 attending soccer pra�tice @ Raynor and Sunnyvale Alliance Field,etc. I would think for the sanity and relatians between Apple,City of Cupertino and its neighboring�ities as well as #he employees themselves,a seriaus and con�erted tra'fFc plan he drafted and implemented#o address the kr�awn"un�cceptahle"traffc fe�els that the City af Cupertinfl is fully aware af. In addition, it is a con�ern that Apple,City of Cupertino,and construction 2 �rew be respec#ful nf its neighhors and nat allow cvnstru�tion ta begin eariierllater than the city ordinance. Lett C86 Letterl0 500045 Name Mike Hammes Address 1091D Narthsky 5q City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA 95�14 �mail mikel5.harr�mes@s�cglabal.net Subject Feedback far Apple 2 Campus Comment Two Comments -What would the impact be on East bound Homestead if Apple emplayees decide to exit at I 1 �e Anza 61vd and go down Homestead to the WolfefTantau entrances. If the exit backup is IQO f11LiCFt Qf3 SqUr�l bOUfld ZHQ @](II lp WOIfB,yau might see that accur -CurrentEy there is a Kaiser site af the�orner of Tan#au and Homestead.Will ste�s be I taken ta make sure that Apple emplayees dan't park there? 2 Thanks .... Mike Hammes Lett C87 Letterla SDDd44 Name Aleksandr Movshavich Address 363 MacKenzie Or City,State Zip Santa Clara, CA 95fl51 Email alek_mov@yahoo.com Subject Rruneridge street closing Comment f don't think that Apple has the righ#to close the public street which I and my wife use daily. There are multiple ways for the�ompany to achieve ifs goals without�hanging existing 1 raads i.e.building underpasses or overpasses. IE is also possible ta alfow lacal residents ta cross the company property. Lett C88 Letter IQ SOOa43 Name Edwarci Hirshfleld Address 734 Stendhal Ln City,5tate Zip Cupertino,�A CUPERTIlVD Email clairelouise r�earthlink.net 5ubject Apple Campus2 Camment I strqngly favqr appro�al of the huiiding permit fvr the Apple Carnpus2. I ha�e lived in my current house since 1963. My home is located 1.1 miles from the proposed locatian. It is reasonable for the�ity to do what�an he done fa imprave streets and ofher farms af transportatian in the area. If there is still a perceived traffic problem,Apple can stagger 1 working haurs ta relEeve traffi�density. I re�ommend thaf the buifding�ammission and city council appro�e the buy;ding permit as saon as possible to make the pracess as easy as passible far Apple.We need to en�ourage this pra�ess. Edward Hirshfeld Lett C89 Letterl� 500042 Name Linda Vander�uEe Address 8143 Park Vi!!a Cir City,5tate Zip C�pertino, CA Cupertino Email lindavanderhule�gmail.com 5ubject Cell reception Camment I live on the corner of 6ubh and M�Clellan.A"�&T is my�e4[provider. I had no cell coverage at my home for se�en years.There is now an AT&T cell Tower Qn the Apple Campus. When that tawer went on line Jan.2�12 I had very good cell servi�e far until Apri�2�T3. The Ap�Ee peopfe moved into the big building on the corner vf Bubb and McClellan, Results 1 Way. I now have ND CELL service at my home.Apparentiy Apple emplayees take prioriry on Cell co�erage in Cupertir�o???????????? Lett C90 Letter ID 5a0a39 Name Gary Jones Address City,State Zip Cupertino, CA 95a14 Email 5ubject Apple Campus 2-Vote far Approval Camment Mine is only ons single voice; aut, here goes IMHO. I helieve the Appie 2 Campus is an awe-inspiring trihute to success and growth far 5iliran Valley and Cupertino.All local govemments should embrace this progress and be nathing less than determined to make if a reality. As to Cupertino; it is my sincere hope that our City go�ernment appra�es this ambitious undertaking with judicious fer�or.�nce approved the Gity's monetary gain be primariiy fa�used on�reating a forward looking�itywide human mobility plan of award winning quality while paying parti�ular at#entivn#o using modern transpartatian systems and ather 1 forms of ma�ing people around using environmentaliy sound pfar�ning such as safer bike paths, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and etcetera. Clearly we are no longer a community af farrners. Cupertino is a complex�ammunity of diverse interests with a momentum equal anly ta other emerging areas of modern society. Let's face the truth;the ship has saiied as to preserving the old. I say!et's approve this project and step-up our game to mat�h the inevitable. Letter ID 5flOfl38 Name Jun Xu Address 9fl5 New Haven Gt Cify,5tate Zip Cupertino,CA Cupertina Leff Email C91 Suhject Suppart the Apple Campusz Comment Qear commitEee, I read the report and felt the oonsideration should look what bring in by the new campus. The new�ampus is I+lOT using old technqlogy or DLD mindset.This will not he the many o�er 10-year old�ars on ihe local highway,e�en in California today than whai the report ciled;there are less family burning the woads in Cupertino than 10 years ago than what the report stated;there are better noise control on 28{3 and 85 than what was 1012Q years agv. As a Iong-term Cupertino resident,I helie�e the new campus will significantly improve the energy use efficiency,hetter traffic planning and local services ihan just spreading the offce building arvund the cities vr in Gupertinv. For example such as the traffc,the google campus will only one majQr access of the 1 freeway 101 to accommodate o�er 1 dK employees wiihaut mu�h issue.The apple carnpus 2 has 3 major freeway accesses on highway280[Lawrence,Wolfe,and�eAnza},it should be much easy t4 accommodate the changes{may not even inorease,just changes from �eAnza exit fo 3 major exitsJ. Similariy for puhlic service,it will help to better plan for the major site than spreading all arnund the ciFy and let the employee to�nmmute via shuttle or persanal vehi�les araund fhe sites. Again,there are many pasiti�e impacts fram ihe sites than even!�an imagine if putting on the new lhoughts and new technolagy mindse#s.Free feel ta contact with me if there are any concerns. Best regards, Jun Lett C92 Letter la 5aQD37 Name Mary 5ue Rosado Address 1 T25 Kinglet Ct City,5tate Zip Sunnyvale,CA 5unnyvale Email s�suja@camcast.net 5ubject Apple Campus 2 impact on residential neighbors Comment As a 42 year resident af Sunny�ale living near Fi4mestead and Wolfe{and more specifically near to Linnet and Fiamestead} I am concerned ahout all the traFfi�that wil!be flawing up 1 and down Fiomestead NOT JUST ARDUND THE NEW Apple Campus. You must realize that you are surrounded by Santa Clara and 5unnyvaEe neighbarhaods whi�h wili aEso be affeeted by e�erything that goes into the new Apple.At Linnet and at Heran we will need better turn lanes. In addifian to al!the revenue that Cupertina will be bringing in with their new venture, you need to take into cansideration that, yes,property�alues will surely ga 2 up, but that means praperty taxes,tao,far thQSe af us wh�ha�e lo�ed living here far sa many years, but are now on fixed incomes.Thanks for yvur attention, Sue and Joel Rosado Mary Sue Rosado Lett C93 Letter I� 5fl0036 Name Frank 8ryan Address 3555 Pruneridge Ave,Apt 9 City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara, CA 95051 Email bryanfh�gmail.com 5uhject Pruneridge Closure Comment I use Pruneridge Ave between Tantau and Woif roads e�eryday for cammuting. 1 Closing this se�tion of road as Apple suggests is not acceptable. Lett C94 Letter I� 500034 Name 5haron Add ress City,5tate Zip , CA �mai! 5u�ject Comment Pkease do not allow the closing af the secfion af Pruneridge Avenue that passes thraugh the planned Apple Campus. Peaple in my neighborhood near Pruneridge and Tantau use it 1 regularly when caming home on 280 Sauthbaund.Apple expects that we will all happily go around their campus,which I�ansider the height of arrogance. Lett C95 Name Yi�g}Cia Address 3859 melpdy In City,State Zip 5an1a Clara, CA 95fl51 Email ro�kcicak r�yahoo.com Suhject I really hate the idea af A{�ple's r�ew campus Comment As you can tell fram my home address, I li�e very clase ta the praposed Apple new campus. I do not understand the crazy idea of Steve Jobs at all.Why put sa many people all together in a huge huilding?What is the purpose of building such a giant in a high density residential area?Just try to build the hard-to-ignare monument for himself? lf you choose building one like that in Utah, Alaska or maybe Siberia,you are free tv do so. Righf naw,e�ery time I pass by the proposed campus,the trees and tranqui[ity there 1 always make me smile. I could not image as soon as the constructions start,everything wikl he changed.Trees will be cut down.The noise and pallution to the enviranment.With thousands of Apple employees r,ome from all around and gather at one spot to work,what a6out the worse-and-worse bay area traffic? For this reasan, I will prey far Apple's business shrinks every second, its sto�k price drops a lot rnore,so it won't waste its money on this totally meaningless proje�t! Lett C96 Letter ID 50a032 Name Richard Alfmaier Address 226fl5 Salem Ave City,State Zip Cupertino, CA 95014 Emai] ri�haft2@yahoo.com 5ubject traffic conditions with Apple Campus 2 Comment !am very satisfied the trafFEC mitigations proposed wifl make Campus 2 work�ery well fQr the community. I believe this AppEe site will bring ex�ellent jobs and�ivic pride#o Cupertina. We have no reason ta fear a few more cars than the current site. Plus Apple emplayees 1 #end ta he en�ironmentally mindec!and will li�Cefy use bikes, huses and other traffic reducing methods. LeE's get this site construction under way! Lett Letter I� 500Q30 C97 Name Qa�id Cookson Address 919 E Homesteaed Rd City,5tate Zip 5unnyvale,CA 94087 Emai� plkc@att.r�et Subject Hazmat Comment During removal of the current structures an the Apple prajec#,Will�antinued air!ground I 1 sampling take place fo ensure that toxic dust,etc. is not released into the ai�? Lett Letter ID 5fl0�29 �'98 Name Kevin Klenk Address Ciry,5tate Zip Sunnyvale, CA 94fl87 Email 5uhject Reservations about Apple Campus 2 Comment Whiie I support Apple's efforts to rnaKe a green campus, I have concerns at�out the effects af the very large campus on surrounding roads and neigh�arhoads.The Wolfe and 1 Lawrence interchanges to 284 are already congested,and appropriate steps must he taken to handlelalle�iate this congestion. Respectfully submitted, --Kevin,Sunny�ale Resident near Homestead and Wolfe Lett Letter la 500028 C99 Name Willie LU Address 'i 218 Bubh Rd City,5tate Zip Cupertino, GA 95014 Email willie.ieee@gmail.r,om Subje�t Natice af Dppositian Comment [Noti�e of�pposition] I strongly oppase Apple Campus 2 DEIR project based on grounds as follows: Ground 1: Huge amount traffics wifl damage the comrnunity and cifizen's quality of life Currently Apple has abaut 1 S offices vn Bubb Rvad.I tvok a�esearch survey vn traffi�s from 9:�Oam-10:OOam fromlto Kennedy Middle School tolfrom the Steven Creek 6i�d on 8ubh Rd, and showed that,five years aga,the average time is 3 minutes. Now,the time is increased to 9 minu#es. If in the fimeframe of 5:g4pm-6:30pm of weekday,#he average time is increased ta 13 minutes. If the traffic model is ma�ed fram Bub�ta Wolf or Tantau,the situatian will�e much worse 1 as Ivts of traffics will happen in 6ath peak times and lunch time. These rapidly increased tra��s will definiteiy damage the life quality of the Cupertino �itizens ancf the fsllow community, be�ause we need to spend more time on the road, breathe more polluted airs and li�e in a more noised en�ironment. Research also shows that such large corporation should not be located in the area of highly populafed residents,wherein Cupertino was well renowned for its worid-class quality of living,res[ding and schooling. For example,Google is far from the resident areas, and Intel is totally away from res€dent zones. Ground 2:Apple's credibility is shalcy and citi�ens risk being fooled or misled on en�ironment protections Appke's Environmental lmpact Report is mostly prepared hy lawyers and other legal professionals,but general publi�is mostfy not a lawyer.While Apple�an�ommit on each detailed clause andlor term on paper,its credibility is shaky based on my personal resear�h,experience,obsen+ation and dealings with Apple for Iong time.Apple has been infringing my patents for long tirne,though responded my letters se�erai times, howe�er 2 Apple is fully knowledgea�le and experienced on how to play the legal games with feEfow �itizens by taking advantages that Apple is a hundreds vf biflion cfollars'company while general public of�Cupertir�o f2esident is only an individual person or family 6ady. If we appr�ve this proje�t af Apple Campus 2, our citizens may rr�ost probably be foaled and misled on the protection of our environments, be�ause once the environment is damaged, it is almost impassible to reco�er it and Apple can always play the legal games with us by its hundreds of billion dollars'reser�e and its large graup o#legal teams. CaNCL1JSIQN When I moved to this city in around 2DD0,Cupertino was among the best areas of quality living,same standard as 5aratoga or Los Altas. But now,Cupertino is quickly transitioning to a commercial-purpose city with too much traffics,pollutions,noises,strangers and 3 canstru�tions. A ciry's prvsperity shvulti not re�y on specific campany's cammitment. Instead, it shauld rely on its fellow citizens and its quality environments. I urge the�ity to remember this Law of IVature. RespectFully suhmitted, lwwlul Willie W.LIJ, Professor and Ph.D A Cupsrtino Citizen since 200fl e-mail:office�a willie.lu This appvsition is my personaf view without representing any�ompany or organization.The pro�ision of this appasition shall nqt constitute a wai�er vf any right, privilege or defense. Lett Letterl0 500025 C100 Name Giselle Ballou Adcfress 1638 Grosbeak Ave City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA 94D87 Email Subject Comment I'm excited and Iooking forward to a thri�ing company in o�r area and the jobs it will create, but a littie con�erned of the traffic it will 1 create at the same time. Giselle Ballou Birdland homeowner Letter ID 50flfl24 Lett Name Cynthia Smyth C101 Address 1 Q455 Neney Creek Pl City,5tate Zip Cupertino,CA 95fl14 Email cynsmyth@�omcast.net Suhject Comment I arn not only in favor af this tremendous development, but applaud It,This is an astounding I 1 en�ironmentally sound effort that should set t�e example and the bar#or all other future developments. Letter Ia 50�023 Lett Name Milt Kostner C102 Address 530 Meadow Ave City,State Iip 5anta CEara,CA 5anta Clara Email Miltko@cflmast.net 5uhject En�irpnmental study Comment I ha�e backed up fflr thi�teen years to the property to be modified by Apple and I ha�e two concerns: 1.Traffic. Pruneridge will he eliminated fram Tantau to Walff.We will have to go around Apple for 1280 access w�i�h north_Apples plans call far 14,OC10 employees p[us additional visitors and cammer�ial trucks. Can Homestead, Stevens Creek,Pruneridge{now twa laned],Wolff and Tantau autside of the Apple boundary roads handle that Eoed?Can the single lane 1280 entrances and exits handie that load? It's easy far Appie to expand their 1 bvundary streets but what abaut 5anta Clara, San Jase and Sunnyvale?Those huge buses might�arry many Apple employees but they slow traffic and make wide tums. 2.Canstruction noise.We dan'f need Apples contractors to start work before 7 arri and that I includes backing up trucks with their 05HA required laud baeping.Nor loud working afler 2 6pm. I dvn't watch much TV in the evenings but my neighbors do. While not a majar concem to me, having all that greenery behind tall berms without access daes not do a thing for us Apple neighbars. I 3 Milt K Kostner Lett �etter ID SD0022 C103 Name Heidi Johnson Address 1153 S�otiand�r City,State Zip Cupertina,CA 95�14 Email HKJohnsan@aol.com 5u6ject Apple Campus 2 Landscaping Comment My apologies as I have nat had a chance to review the landscape plans. I did however talce a quick giance and noticed almost right away that#here was an errar. �ouglas Fir is a tree that daes not thri�e in the�alley. It prefers higher ele�atians e.g. The Sania Gruz Mountains. It shoul�f be replace�f. lt makes me�ancemed a�out the rest of the landscape plants.Has the landscape plan been re�iewed for locai canditionslmicarclimates? I would 1 he happy to help, but I am nQt available until after June. !am an adjunct fa�ulty member in the En�iranmental Ha�ticulture De�artment af Foathill College.At E:30 PM vn June 26th I will be administering a final exam so I can not come to fhe puhEi�meeting.FYI 1 have been working as a landscape designer in#his area since the mid$a's,am a Certifed Green Gardener,and serve as a volunteer Master Gardener.Thank-you. Lett Letter I� 50fl116 C104 Name Richard and 6everly Olsen Address 611 Hubbard Ave City,5tate Zip 5anta Clara, CA 95051 Email olsenric@sb�gEabal.net 5uhje�t in fa�or of campus Comment We are generally in favar of this project and Eive two blacks away.We ha�e heard speakers Tram Apple and we like their plan fvr a�isitv�s center.We wouEd like to 6e informed a6out 1 landscaping, noise and traffi�issues,and access to I-280.We also want to be notified about the EIR and up�oming meetings. Thank yau. Lett C105 Letter IO 50Q�90 Name Todd 6eirdo Address 11529 Murana Cir City,State Zip Cupertino,GA 95014 Email nospam@pfease.com SuhJe�t I will move. Comment ff this de�elopment happens,i will rr�o�e.Too many years of camplete destruction ta end I 1 up with a�ampus that engineers prfldu�ts made overseas. Lett C106 From: Keithdd1577@aal.com�mai6to;Keithddl527@aol.cam] Sent: Monday, 7uly Z2, 20i3 9:30 PM To: Karen B. Guerin Cc:City CEerk Subject: Re: Apple Campus Z draft EiR-my publi�evmments far inclusian July 22,2U73,time:4:21PM Karen Please include my entire comment,which includes the forwarded email which was ariginally atiached to my email and which ynu replied to,this is my camplete cnmment regarding the Apple 2 Campus. Th�nk ypu. Keith Murphy 1p159�ast Estates Drive Cupertinn,CA 95Di4 In a message dated 712��2a13 4:i 1:�0 P.M. Pacifi��aylight Time,ftarer�GLCUperi�r�r�.orc1 writes: Tiiank ynu for yau��ra�i��ent tu ti�e �ity ❑F Cul�ertino on �he Apple CampuS 2 Di•aFt En�ircm�»ental l�npatt Rept7�•t. I ha��e Farwarded yai�r cnnin�ent tt� be part of't}te of'Firial recart�. �urii��_= �h�: ptihlic �amm�nt period thal t�rt�]5 �fn Mr�n�l�iy.]uly 22. ?[)13 at 5:3(]PM. pleatie tiubmit yaur commen[�directly ta ��_tuj,c.��tini+.i.±a��,la�?Plc.rc�n�3zici�l,. From: I�cithc4dt�+27f«auLrnnE 5ent:fllondxy,,�ul►�l2.2ii13?:l3 Phl '['o:Car►•Chau Cc:Citv Clerk;Cit► Cuunril 5ubjeet:Applr C umpus�dr,ii'l F.1H•m� pu6li�cc�mn3ents for inrlusiun A�plrt Carnptis?draft k:i[i - "puk�li�cnmineittti D��•�Inper:Apple snc. Architcci:Foster ar�tl 1'�rtaers Prnjr�� f14,intt�cr:Gary[:han 1 Piu[;hnsh July�2,�013 Dem Ci�v Cc�im�il.A7r.Cha��ncl h7r.Gh�f51i I lia�c fc�rwarded alo�i��wi[h[hi�cmail my pric�r comm�ntti whiclz I��c��ld likc tu hc includcd w�iilt 3ny currcnt ccvm3izcn[ti ati p��<<�rti,��ni« I 1 rnmmcni far[he draft EtR 1br thc Applc Cam�uti?. Many of'nur resid�nis are curinuti w�hy!ati!-VackinR nf Appl�S E1R was nol lrantipuiti�t[ly mention�d at many prinr puhlic hcarin�ti,nc�r was thc significancc nf Applc a��oi�in�kcy EIR miii�a[ion hy applyin�ati a CaGlbrnia[aadership I]e�cicipment Pn�jcct was nen iramp��r�ntly 2 explained�o your co�lti�i�uentti.let a[one�he impac�.s ol'fast�racking the FiR�ould ha.�e«n�he cummunity a�lor��e.hatied nn Appies o��n tigh�ly�imed applicaEinn�chedule' Lett C106 cont. Whrr�is c�ur eity'tiµeb vili[ink lu lhe 5ca�e',�n�irc�nmenl�sl Lx;i�ier�hin A�l uf?f111 ke��i�l:i[ii�n,fe+3 «ur��rr.nuiniiy le+eatiil) linJ:�r��l�fun rc�ic�v ihiti kcy 1rki51:�tintti u�hirh A�rPlc iti cvnkin�tind ap�lyin�fi�r!�1 WC't:QA reli�f unde�'? 2 Tltir Ciiy nf C'uFreriinn tihuukd he prus�ti�e in puti�i��any EIKICEQA arplic.uiun�n�ui��c��i.��c�ullus� �im�l� u:u�.��arc��y��rr�i�� i�� uur C011t. ci�ntililt�cnlz.pre�i�clv�crautie Appl�has;ipplied It�r E1R rrlie.!-un�cr lhc Fn��irnnment�il I_caJertiEiip Arl«C_'f11 I un�1 hcliiv�!iu]i;c�i�igcncy i�I11:111Sj:iiL'i{t74'II7��Ail��l{?l�1]LI11S. lf i.ti ti:lCl[«r�,i[�th�lE lI1C.tiCIiC11U1in'_'��I ApPlr.ti:]�1�1I1i':111I131�{11i1CICI�ti 14'I{I7 ;r m�irkeJ I;��I:��I'AfiAC',1i2H��1 hnutii�z�_=i�3iiig,iii��n hii��in�lat�.in th�Ciiy nt'('u�cninn,tbr Aprlc�i�mi�i�+�tiG i1i[3mel�•�.�,ati dcscrihr�l ten p:1er Sil��l'��lc'a rn4n Jn�uiticn[.'-AppticutiUn f'nr l:nvirni�me�t�! 3 [.eadership[)e�elopmenl Project.;lpril IS..ZQI?." 1'Ir�i.� [��Il��t� li�il.:l�ll�):�'��ri�,i��u�_li1i��'y�A r�ili�C;�n��,=��i�.�ei11 ]�i.ti irr�uhlin�[t�rr•s�l thx�un�ker 1'u�ure prnvitiii�m��I tlie En��irnnmental L�.i�i�r�.hi�A�•t�rf�t�l I.xi�h Aprii ilinr iiti��rli�•��tiu31 preci�iy fi� ille[ime il di�.Applt will a14��x,uii! Futurc�nvirunmen�al mi�i�atit��ti.iiio�i�uli[eo[f�:il iti in u��r��,minui3iiy'ti�n�tiurr«un�littir�itieti p�rhap3 hieh�r in[crrtitti.mutil im�irn�m�ly rc�ar[linc hnutiing cif all ly�cti��Eaich i�ui�_�rrcl hy��i'lir�ti��rr�kr��clnEim�ni.m.ikinR A�pl��h� I.irec�t asnlrihulc�r[��loc.I hi�usine disparily thu[utir cily hus e�er tiGrn. y 4 Ap�ie i*:jusl onc nci�hh��r,a��ry hig nn��,hut Eh�ir rtew[�I�IirG campu5 which ll3cy�7ropnti�will I�arc impac��zn our cammurii�y Ine n��iny Jccadc�tn rnm�.!il:c�r:i!'li�,sra why umilcE rn�r ri�y n�firisls wan��his rme a�p[irant tcs u��nid kry cn�irnn�ii�•nul,hnusi�g and lral�fir miliealic}n uti prupused hy�•arinuti 5tatc:sgenci��s,clue�o CA's Eosip hul�ti? 1 ha.�r�irr cz�nccrn5 of��ic�le,irecl�•�icanc}.reyue5ted�y App1r.ul��uhli�ri��hi nf w�r�al}rJ Pru�ieri��...4�c.��hi�h�urr�n�lv hi,ccE.�A��plcy Iw��amal�_*;�malid p�r�cl�hu{�in�*ln be t�nc. Pruneridec A��c_pr;�vitleti�2 key �rai��nna�iun artcry which will h�i�l'I�tr grcufir im�i»lan�c tn Cl1i71111U1i'I'S R'I]C11 lll�A�7r1IL Ci1.ITi�1U4 lti ILiIIy'[IL1'l:I[3�14LI,11U1 I ICAr iha�w_ih�1��k'��n�r,31 f'G:u nf tltc puhfi��i.ti hcin�:i��urn}��rohl�m,tha� rj Pruncri�l�+c r�4c.K•ill hG rn�,�t�J�4i[��nul tihu�4iil��rr,il izzcri!ti�r ditiim�tin,cl��ilt•�i:ihiG��ztinnti tn rc�uin th�;�uliliG rn;��l,if'ii�:in alcrtrJ tittu�, �5�iflr+P��L'itil'�:�cl litl[):i LLi1111�i i]i flti li hYlt1��. Tlzr�am�generaE��uriiy leur�.K�hith Appi�f�ruJlr�ry's wulC f�rr any EIR iz�iiiga�iim ii,hu.ts cEispfr:�sure with,.itti�,im�;��,mitiratinn li�r hu[h p:irk anJ tr.iil anzenitieti in anJ:irrninJ ih�prnjrr�:irea,4recit3cally li�r lhr Calah:i4:iti Cr�ek:incl ripari:m��rriJur—�rnprrly uftirh i�imd�r Ehc�rm�rnl nf'lhc SunGi C'l:ir,i Vall�f W;IIL'1 CIIti[Ci�[, N'hu Su�p�irt k�c�ll�uail and�rark c1��lrtipiaieniti hJ crr�k��h�n��rr fcasihlc.h�it AE�PIc h:ts 6 nth�r idcas(is sl�nwn iii my Ei�rw•ar�ed em�iih f�}�iiziplementing nrw i•t,��ructin�l in a�icukin��lut.�a�hi�l�i�nol s��ncli��u�tl unlil Phati�?.17u1 preem�iively buil�inJxy i�kill CF:QA rIR miti�=titit�a which i�in ihe puhlir'w h�.tii.ui�.i iii�l�e�•in�ereti�. 1�i�irlt[wtJ�r��and l<<Si�rarkinr reyuireel unilr.r il�e cun�.i��A�i'S re[tiiircniei�[ti li�r A�plc l[�b�ill��ihl�li��'tita[r��c�izi,il�ic he�zrli�ti.hul lt�E Ap�l�ia rreJale�rily tichG[IuIG th�r�applica�inn tn u�i�iJ��r.5u��re5s��z�•irn��m�nril,linusiir��iiJ[r,31'lir mitieutitvn��liirli Lhe�ta�e c�F CA wiSheti[t�ifllpi�tiC on lhN i'c�[ul'n�u�re,id�ma.and not madc trainparciu iz��uc.31 nii7iiul,. i+ditiin��cnu��uti i�l�hutl�ii�r CiE� uF Cup�rtinu ati the Ic�2d aeenry an�A�plc�iti ifu ap>>�ic:lAE.[ti f]UI'(�C1'lfl=ilq I1lil�I[';i.�:incc. I 1111(I35L'OW'll�•[lI IlV 11Llf CLlfi'C'.fll GLY��I C13�11'fIIIIU[S�IiCE:IIti<<rne:��,r��h�in�•iufa{i�m��i-lhe En��irnnrn�ni:d L�aJcr�hip Ac[[i[ 31111.hy tiuphrc�tiint�lhi�.iE��}li�.tn[k EIRICE•[�A Ju�iwn�nl��+t�ti3y kiu�.thcn tiuppreti�i�i�*ihe impilL'Iti ii11�117YCLI f'14'1111'1�r3�•irt�nmeiH.ti L�aSrrtihi�A�l ul?i}1! iitiril'ai all�ric�r�uhli��h�,irine�,f'tir��am�lc ciurine ihr I-fu�tiinr[_Irm�iat L'�cEalr:ti�d many Gcnrr:i!P1�2�].iii�in[ImCiifti l�nr:ip�ru�ing m«rr ni'1ir�I'n�ia�e alli�imen�ti Fnr rrti��ur.itie�nti.�iz�n fnr ihe�7FL'LI:I[iIN timin��ul'.4p}�lcs Camputi?�tr�iEic:i�inn iii tiup�+r�s�5t�[t. �n�•irnnnm��lal mitisalirsn whi�lt�vill impacl��'cry r��idini'.ti qualiiy n1'lii'c!'nr many dccadcti ur<<mir.. ]n n�y E�ricvr�mtiii�, I h�i�e�riecl�n tl�urihi [n ui�r C'i�v uE Cuheraiun'ti efectecl�u�cf.��ipni�i�e�rcprc�em:�ti�•es il�al the cil}•'��h�ile i.L ni�i uticr 7 iricndiy,u��I�e ona��tla�ecf a�•cess u�kcy prnjeci:opplicEi�iu�1 d��i,i.fik��l�e �clieilulc•��:c.y E�utti[ic cnm�ncnt:u•y aeri��i�an��hc•n liir wh�Ei iti��sct �fi��n�u.yt c��nim�n�cm hy a speril�ic dalc.is v�ry c«�ir�lic��t�d Ea IinJ.b��rn�,re lil�cly i�iipntisit�l�ln t�nJ.il��nc t��is tts rciy nn ilte CiIY�71' Cu�cninci'S weh tiiic�ti it exititti t�xla�•. 1,im Jitim:�rt�i�h:at 1 tiiil!h:nr ra�iitll�•i;31 rss�iioic��tii my�rinr t�m:iil�iii;itl��[�4i;i�t'I��c�pl;�in ih��ni�tv 1 nntiniit•ri��i uhirii m:inr rt•�i�it ni't ditiL��4�reil l.�ki�ig��I:��e in�37,4�i�1�'ti]�.irl:�arkinr l��likut�d hy C'aE:dtiasa�Crech�Tanlau A��e�in�i i=rccw,i} ?�!�- :i�tl1i��c��!pre�a�arY pre�mplint ul �uf�lic��v�r�ighi.�n�lair Y[R ��iitir.itiim unly tiup{��+rl�lk'�pul�lic'ti wrn•tit 1�ar�thxt E!R itiiligaliun��ilE nul l�e.i�ihuet�iu t+y hu[h thc I�ad a�c��ty,Ihr Cil} ul Cup�rlintr.nnr hy[hr r�E�plictut!�iht��I�tiirc«im�mui�iimulu�tiu��xirt 1'nrm��u��latc�rilh[he.�JJc�hrncli� uf..I:itit lr:i�E;ing"uF ElR li�r lhr Ap��i�Camputi�pruj��i.hiEt wh��Jenx�ntilrate an.ur�r��u l:t�k�iif��illinrr�r��<<�li�lli�n lltc f�le i+!].n�:inJ whiv tihnw c�}niei�int cst ilteir�ell«w n�i�l�h�sr�. Lett C106 cont. [:lur�i�y cc�uzrcil. I suggest.li,o�•e,iilvneaied ihere clected aiui i�irn m:ui�la�rrl ciuiiE�s iu Jn!he pec�pl�.ti�ti•�x4:in a iranspar�m ia5hini�,ati ihcy Ir�itilati��cly f'rriind�i��:}} !u:rvnid iakinc resrrnitiihiliiJ•tix�nnunr�rtiial:tclinnti and dreisirniti hy rrcuting tlic "ucl��r[�irsrrc�rrrr ur�f�rr�rrrl ��rr+c•e•,rs",<<�ri�ilz�?z��iiirh lh�C[ntutiuni��•Tleveli+pimi3t Clirrrh�rc'ni�l�J ahu4r.�eriin�<<fulure coiir4e ul��erp�lr<<leJ malfea�:mrrr hy e�in {�i�hlii iil'ti�i�il�,nh5lru�iui��iny puhiir[ran�p.irciuy r�r�arJinr+prc�j�rt aprruv:ils -[hat'ti mixiimr�inn i�y ilic�ity r�iimcil tnf dtic�iihlir� hi'J utii�i�ihi C'i�mmunify lluveln��nei3�Direc�ur;{ti llklf FI4'�Ill�f35V�IlIC,'I[I-SII�E11,l�Iiti till.1�lti lil III�,I3f7W�I'IUI:1�J�1IIC�117I.ti�1�Kji�t W'IIII Il[]Lf]iLk.ti iillt� h.11:lCl�l.ti�«h�tiL''L'�3 Il7f II7(.'41UhI1L'ECl S�'L'li ft.II�I Ifl]Ill..,l4'Il]IL'llUr�L''ti1LI�`11[�ti 1;IL'CI�{{fl'.�I-iSL'f113I14'L'CU4'Cff1177Cf11,l}I7CL'h�htilJen tt�v�ziers,iti legi�laie�uu�[�I�exiti�ence..ii lhe txa��m�nzen�when-}nu-uur�i�}'c�uneil,are nee�ircl�n proleri�tte public�tne�cutmnunily you.ter�•c. Ynur rrtiide�i�'s[ieyire tn awf:yuu.nur"rlertcd"rily rui3ncii.�raclly whu[:uc lhc hr�:icl[h and scu��nt thc ucw•pnwcrti�yl.'admini.stra�iv� 7 ap�ri��al.ti"�+Itic:h"lhr ct�}�uinir�l"C.umitwni�y Dr�rl«�mr.nl Direrlc�r ran�u"i��Irc��rcr�rrr r+�rlrc rirti c r�irrlril"anJ u h}•ran'I lhusr ti��e�'ial ap�r�}vals hz hi��le�Cur iht��uhlie.lu revir�t�.u��!]re c•ih•'s x�rb silc,�u soliril puhlir r:>>ttmrnix re�.�r�ine [ho�r ailminix[ruii�e.t}�prin•alti in ci C011t. limLly manner hefnre dr�t��rt�.le�t'.ti:ipprr+�';il iti�Ilnwiii SO�Um�nCi�t'C'.' � 5urciy ilicrc iti nu iliure im�turlanl de�cli�rmen�pruj�c�Lhcn[hc A�1F7IC C8lTl�lllS�,[111E WI11CI7 CfiCti L7lll I[lf CII�SFI�c'ti Ll5 I]L'ii7:lilt'llY 1I}C CIIV ti N`�Il tille.il juti!!n tihnW lhC CIhiCAI il:sn�Frareii�y o!'thc�ic�ians r�f�iil nf'uur cl�r�cd und agp��irti�cd ci�p ol�'icials.�•ou wl�n ynur rnzistiu�r�ticy decply inv�tits:�1i cil�h�ir irusi f a, I u�nuid re��rrr.[iull7 rtyu«i fit� nur puhlir ulfival's E�±cf�m��nslralr a m��rr ethira3 h:indline�f huth infi�rming�h�piiblir ahntiE dc�rli�pntrni ��'��jc�[�w�il ii�r i�ur publir inyiiirieti�ul�miu�cl l[�y�+ur:iceucy in g«��I:iiEh.re^ar�in�E�rujr�t.i��li[•:il�unti.�pe�.ifi�:il]y lhe A��{�le C�.unpu�?. ��f��r�lhc I�ad:i�cni'y i,[li�C'ilp nf CuperLi�u�.ii yuu lrufy res�c�l.intl ctctiire[��Vosicr c�u:ilily r[R milig:ttinrti lur all Cu��erlittt�re,i�e�ilti.ta�l ,takcllr�ld�rs whu vnu:Lfl':3�1�1[1kllE�i�:1PCI[IlCli IT1:111�:1ii;ll Iti1 tiCf4'i'fairly. '1'h.ink yun. E�eith?viurphy Cesidcni oI Cupertiniti -----Qriginal Message----- Fr�m;{tiei�liddl527@aol.cnm Date:Thu, 18 Jul�fli3 i�:22-32•640fl{EaTf Subject: New constructian in rear af Apple parking Ik[,adjacent tv Galahazas Creek Tn:CityCouncil@cun�ri�,�o.or�� CG:aar[is Cupertino.orc},c;tycicrR�ct��ertino.��r[a.stippe�sL�7vaffeYwal�r,orq July 18,2a13 Dear City Cvun�il and Cammunity Deveiopment di�e�t�r, Can you p�ease supply the following Apple pro�ect applicatian IVo.,describe the puhiic h�arings that were s�hedu�ed regarciing that appEications re�iew and then the permit number ihat alEawed the constru�ti�n sh�wn at 1�435 N�rth Tantau Ave.,in Cupertino? Was this perhaps a Cnmmunity Qe�elopment Qirectar's special administrati�e approval? Was this new�or�structian approved as part of a new development agreement with Apple7 Piease direat rne�o the doaumeniation covering the approval process do�uments for Ehis project and could yau alsa dlreci me to any Sania Clara Vailey Water Qistrict permits or approvals-whi�h clearly show both City of C�pertino-and- SCVW Q's set backs and easements were f�llowed. g Were special exceptians granted fo Apple ta disregard any of these easements and se1 ba�ks? WhQ is the 5anta Clara Val�ey Water districl permitting�ontact fvr this spe�ifi�project,it is 5ue Tippets perhaps.or? As tha old office stru�ture a[this address. 1 Q435 Norih Tantau Ave,is siated for demoli[ivn as part of the new Apple Campus P project,currently ihat applkcation is a[the EIR stage.why wasn't Ihis new consiru�iifln sean as requiring adequa[e public noticing, public hearings,to a11aw EIR mitigation impacts tor the future Bevelopment o{a new city park andl�r a�reek riparian trial andlor a seasanal park in the SCVWD corridar where Calalaazas Creek lies adjacent to this new construction? Goagle maps shaws that in early part af 2013: no de�eiopment or construction was seen in Appie's rear parking lot,adjacent to Calahazas Creek and Tantau over pass: Lett C106 cont. i a��••s�.�, � i � *„n�trs�i��a�:s noonla�om�maF'�s�r,=153xx•�:all�a+parkr:a�+cuF�aitino•r.aRia=�TF�.YTI_ I �i) .L�� 7p435 North Tantau A�enue,Cupertino,CA � � �"• ,�'j{��j� �f.f.` � � .+ ` � �� ' �� . _ .�� s J: �r' r f" ��' A:� .. - / �. � �•_ � �'` � _ri.,':� , r. - • . �, - , •+ ' ` � �g .�a��. � � '� � � +� � _ ��<;i� • , �: * � .�X�� i 1 '��`��'�' '�. �` '*+ `� '� '�" �rs��,_ �� y+. � �•�4� �` } . �r �w r - �3�j,� � , �� fi�`�, `�t- � .-- ,•��-��r;; �T J� �ti �� y �aa..:� � � r'- ' �/ :r� ! _ ■ II ' .� ' � � � e �.��f • �..;�,rara�roi.nr.e, .,�.�..,.�.sva e• Uane _— . i �� AS seen lorm hionh side ot Tan[au 6ridge.loohmg wesl,large cancreie muHi siary slructure can 6e seen: �vr r•�.{-e�.:� L`�' -.../. �..�.,�. ,I.. . ;'fl" C.�nl. �� t{.`F-�'�7�'k'��';'��K:.�A•��r•" 5� : v..=��::. !d 4 -1[,'. �� '.� � ;�,.:�'�r ti , .f��«�• .�:,�,/� ,+��.,�'� �c;�; ., .`�f�� ..,� �,� '.:,.M1: . �' :'�k��'.',;1�1`...J.=Y=, ,�,"•'� �`�+r �f�'�i�:�.r��,+��F 94 '%!�' }m '�:.�:,� �J r, ',. y� � �•', ''�'�; � ... � ,�#L:..�,? 'r + . ;/r,.•��n� � r�' �.tii, �r��-"�. - 'a�j'..:. ,�� r.:�..�r- } �� .v ��.'. �.i� • �.��d.: t. r :�� -�v'..�.'.� . .�.�:: :�: : .,�}.. �.. F �•:�r- ,�.: ±'.. 'r !{'} ��:�!v+"�: ��ru:.. ,' r ,� :�„°�r�. .=�:��:. Y�. .��, �.,<. S.. .r, :f�~ �F��si�. • '�� .d_�.. •ir. ._F�. .:i�.�>. �?�, �iys:,.�� k;�(... . t�`�.,� ��;:��'•l �� >� }�� :"= y� � •,� -�r�.l w�]L " �'r'�'�f+.. ..?�:�?"F �.s .+�,' • •Y•::. -Fq.' . �{. ,'fl..�y., /_�-#�T1'':i .r!.Cn..�,:p'.(.j'[ S :j"'y ,��..:� � '�1 ,'. y� �s IL�w��,� �'.r. ':�'... .*�•�. � 'V:. ��{1 .�r:,�a'Ai�S Yw'1.�L�'.-:,-^fi'�• s!��•i"�,�.y� �' - i,Y/:''YT?�k.�.yyj�t.• Sl�-.�' �j �2' _ -�� - •. ".� .: �.} T , y- - h .7 �� . . ' �N�iy -.:'�r r�y�1 �" •F^ .�C.ti....��"��:.•�,' :•�,y�, 5 .. ';,'{�yY'�SNe,.Y ,4'':- "' w.�.. f '�i' SSY'� ';� �1�.:::�_J.�. � .� � .} J .�� 'Si .�. :, 1,p.'i.;" '`I',. 'µ �. '. �ai . F� '-'s, ; 's, � ti�'��n � y ;��.'4 Y$r �� --� �Z x ��! �.�'• R �-�,` ,, r r '"�.� . r!� s � r.,�i �' J -i� .. Y.^` • �'y�,Y. � .1-�•' .r� F �f� , � y}; �'•, � � ',f .• :. ��i� �'i: `,; y�, x `�: • ".��t-��fl,,.�.:;'�: •t�tr. ;...� C ^^ �;`` ` �-�r �r._�.... .. .�;:... -.•: :y.` -' •. �-:. �' _ _ �� •'.�i;'"- ,,i. 1�:9. ;�.��av!'• ��i�.,.., '�•ti�?'.��?7-_'. '',�fi,�..:� 4..... .:.k.� _i�.i.;�..:r�, -?'.�.`> - ''S'' - .f:. ' ''.`i:. - �. i.y`�. .�3�..�!i•- ya. �y:�''i, � �J-. p:�:: '•��"1', j� �e� - .;�•�: ;��'• �� ,::r;::� �r _ . .��,:;;;: 4;- RF 1��'+- .•{�•� � . , '��` '-c�'j.'��r �� F; � !' x��.^.�. .•,S�`' :ti.� .�.- - _ �..�i,, �.;, '.: �.�.� � F-fi�'':,.� � '.. 'SSk.� -- ��t• � i�e.r 6• ?+�,;:e'•:��:.�:�. k. ��'f.�!'1�.r ::�• °�� ''�-' _i.,_ .u� '��'?:,':.:..,:.,,:,�: - - 'f�y"as '��_a� y �_!l ,.�'�,,3 x �a,,: �F.t•. ,;:i � �',�_.•�� . �y�:�:t::Y�' .,�y'.•: �j? wr. "�,�.� .�:'.S__�j -. '��-'.i{..:��.i��: �:(' •ff, c47�+. :F..,`• � 1 d'3.' "br.�•.Y:.� �' - ;�ii� i�.: �i:r� .��' t..!.r i ��- :�Y`:_. ' . .. _ '� - .� .� •��:��^}fi- '.�... :7�a� i r ,;. �i M�.'�. �'1.. •}`.i-�- _'_y�•-7 _- - y� �.i�h ��7'��. .•�,��,��r'.r•fY�.,< 'c..�pr_,+i .�m yi��. �.Z;.w�i �,�. ,`i`; '.��i:y�?I ZY�_ ID�y' �.�4'r", ��i��i•e �a•=�lr.�"-�,4�.;. :l�, +if�_�r� �,..�••.�.'�A`��'.'. ��f�,.�•='c-'' _ ..��, .4� .,'.�,- �+ t.� .k4:z } �e.=+• �l r�` - ''�� r ti'�r�'::.. ;�.: �i'-�,'�5� �i� ~-_�,".'� r_�.� .��'r'�:�_?� l�rs�• � .�:��.� �[;;��-�� .,� ;�ii. Vt,� :-'=F''f• � r -"y �g �': �:a�:'r..�� ' ' -:.¢'± � � ,'��:�' �•y+i� .� ,.f •�' .r ::.f� r,�•, - ::[ � �� ,�.��. �'.rs�.f.; .q �,.�,�i�:^p;��`.�ra,`+�i.'-�� .-��": ��-3,.:`{'I,... � �' ..5;<-a�. r.: � �3� �- r-�.e-.��7+�� . . -.' l,.�r.: 5, �'{Ta.4�� •'�i �':��t. �'� �ri�� lP�- �:��..�,.•,'��.`„��- -� ---- � ..:F•:• . .""S �''» . Yp"_:.vi'.. -��Y . ...zf 4"y. ':_y T-�%i' . I.4 -.�..�•.�......A. i�• = . •• . • � . '�i ... i.. _ - �'*� - ` 1 ..� •,� �x' .:.�'.- . .. �.�....� .� .�;;� ��'. ...:� ` _ ��F . ¢� . .�-_..7 Y �J�` �� ' 'ky � +5i �� Fa . :�, °� ' '1 � -�."f�, �� ;f]':. ..� '!�Si�c.•��i.1.• -�''s 3r ;.JS'�° • •n .._ J.�'�'�,, ' � 1 i ,. �:.�.5:.: : . `7tf`- _ '9i�,�{''�:�'�.. r','+a�. . - � �-;�ri1�':-•�-4 ',i � '�� , '3��!'��'��`•,�:i g.......-��.r: S •- � � �� ;,� , ,4 y r -� m ' ;? ti �. � '��,:. .'T� �i 7 l�: j _ � '�i:�e y,.::i�• ' . . -r _�. [ _ � +'� ��`yy�� . . ��` - :'� �F � ..�.:�-. � .i' - ''�': �_ J� �- '�:•J ' 'r � � 1, w . .. r.�r�:,,�.- '��..� �-�p.i `. �. �. �f " '.�� t f __ ' - -.fr;� ."•-'f'' - r ' ---' . �� '+, : �: :.v�1 _ .�•°� .. ... . �".i.�'r_. ' . � , �.. . :� . I' Lett C106 cont. �ti:. .: , " �A;;.:?:., �{:. ..::.: ,..:-,':�.::;.. g �•�a �` �•.i�_. �`i�` ?`"'as-'' i l. �. � �`-�.:�� . :;�:; y3r F-f'�Y�,,'•.. , ��1'• ..,:�� - �}.: ?� ��, .� -.�.v'•c+ `-: 1 �+��:"-�.y��s.r�-�st ]�,..�'.�.� � +'�� y',;�: �:S'�'' , �r. { �� . £ i �'.�,.�:�,�'. ,i�'�..�.i',f��`u-y��`��:�? ..•�+(�+�: ,�.��'_•� ;a: � � �� y'� 'iHr :�.Y. .c�H+. . �. �Qy�•. ,�'t�.. _ 1t., iiYr�41�1'� �. r�.�,�; . . _ � %'�-...s��.�,:.Y.. '�". .. '��I �' �" � . i:r. .:�#:.�l�C ,..�t.'.T� �x`��' �lA. :.�.. s: �:'`. .r.;�'� Fr'F:;x } r R� ' �.� .�-��, •w'�� •_:�. ��%5..`:.��. :, n.��'r�.:'_'''��t"°:��F R ■ ��?�y��.•.A7 .�i'�.+t"� ��'4 ..sk•f:�l��{. ��f � �'; 'h;: - t.�,'-.�. :`�+��r 1 1'�., '�I'N'•�':.,'� I " ^ }i+ 5�'t , as" y�+i.:.'.',��':.:..'.:;�`.'::�r : ..'��..�a- f'�. � y�{�( ".�e�`^''y!•4 .. f'ry,. . _ F�"i � � �i's'�?'�:..•' �' �� ti.:. i �f�,;•� �r,�}.F.�' •.�;=;`- - �... :'S .�.�y..Y�:�=�� •• ' ' ��:•��; I• �" , ,...,., �'.:':y�y' °r:' �^'�� - i1�� y,,r�� -�`�n ixal`'�{��t�.• ''.N�;':-L'.r y i , 4 �� •=�r� "��'T�'.�'� -,t��":�y' d.}'.'x'��..S'-'�_3t�;� .-�` : �j' '.,� 1 1•,�''. . d�T' _.. T `:y'1� ,Y ,. ,,:n.F � r� ..n�M1 . �::r :p �yy :• �F.�• ;�"= •''` ;-:,:. r�� . �' �� 1,- ��• �.iti�r:-�•�`�;'':•`?. . '�Jr'��` .fi ; •_ � . :t. ��:��'• " �,y..�' ��,� =�7 �!k, K��-:�.�. ::- �Ff . q� � . 1��' �r`� -.. �l.� l• _ � si _ �' _ . ��ra,e.J�';;.i�,= . �:.4' � �� y j - ., i��. _�i �.: `��..'�-��•.,�. .. ��,�? , �' '.. r.:•.C«`•=�^ ssi�r {. - '�::A� v �{� � ..' �_ 4� .j��<.,�J�'.' F:ti:''� ��•'ii`•.;v'�.,sk.,•:'J..' � ' _ `,�'.� �:�• �. =� r �'• . '=A� �"�R "� !1i ,y=�`. - . i y'1�.e'�;;` sra ±�ti•"?��r� --e ��''�' a ', ; � • - �:�.ks' � y. k _ ' i �':�.'... . .. � +-'r - � - '+1 .�r A�! ?' .-�' � �`,-�-`� ��`'''� �� ,�+��,�. � , �� "'p� - - -�``.. . ,s� .. . . . . . 'a�; � '' 'L !.C:„``,.��- - _ .. • ':�Gr i1��- ' ' � •_ _ : " .�' -lx' ��s- � � `'J'E��r�i� �' . 'ii °5.:.'.;. . . -.4 . . _ :•�.��.� .,5�;• , _ ' �. r��.� . �. �r;5z��n; aa• _ ��'� , �~...� . $. �r , . - 7_! �� ;. . •r � _ - , � � � . �s�. -�._.�.;:�'s.j �� , O .:.:. ... ........ . .' ....�� .., . �_..::- ..�.. . . ... .. � � ��,�e��emine o sum ��..,�.�_�..._..._,.,. ._„ �" cont. H�-O[.��c SFtm[ar.51�.x'a�:��+2�^�✓�Ol��,�n w.�15 IL" • � '�, ',�''" .��h i +�{�.. � � �� ' "��?+�.i��-i. ' �y .� = ` , �,'. .�a�� . � �:� ��r. ; :"F l i F �.'�JF` �ar��..r: 6� `77r'.��. ., .•r.: _�;�` _ ',r y� '��.. f• " .er',_.;_� -'� ' � ` �:? L r=F- � �- �*��!L� �j�{" c+� 'y, •�. `�"„� �' ` 4'" ' -,�l M1y• a�}�{�+•_*l ,;n i� ^ f+'.�� f� . ..f r= � ,'� !.' •_+�"- '�� '�Y . r �' *. , � . � 1� ''� �� ...,.-.�....-- - F' •; ,} - �� • �� a � y� ti " • - �i 4'�' ;. � .�.�" . � - - ` 41�'�. �� .- '. . r ..� "i..' _ r '' _ r,r•. - i�ea ��-- _....,�..., _ �• _ ! I � _ � i � ,. ' _ � r � , ��. , :.�rr�„_� �. ' f ` - .. , . r • - - f..t_ i .��.'i� .-�'�r - . � _ � ---�:� - . . � �,, ��- . . . i:;�:;�F�?i\i\UY::.::,.. Y . '•..j$;•• � � _.. �y'}� .. �'1,:;:..,:. . �L'" '.,,',� ,,l.'•l:•.\':��:•.��•,•- ` '`ri i i � . .'- � �..�� '1�i�1;•!��:i?::�;`?i��'\�F �. '�r�l��i. • .. � : � ` � i��4rY''�'I . . �• _ , �� . �ti,_� �i �?'tia4;;� � .. ...y.:�,E��`� ;;a�; R _ . ,,� �.'.��.�°r,;: �a..'. y,4�{r�' - K,.. ..;-` . . ti , �� ii "�^.... " r�` � „�.'. . ' .. y.h]yF�s�� . r ` ��,`.. r �:.�. . f � i5`1� . �, ,.,__5. .....-� � `��itYl�; �td _.. .��`:-.w. '� A�io i�e igN.:no rvrr�ervni�I:�:c..•;.ii_i•�•.:... �i �.-... .. Lett C106 cont. Very disheartening to an�e again see that a titan size corporation will arrogantly over ride the EIR pro�ess,selfishly short circuiting the pubiic hearing process req�ired to obtain fair m�tigation for all EIR impacts which the App€e Campus 2 will impose an our entire communfty and surrounding cities. Upvn the receipt of applicativn and permit appra�als fvr the City af Cupertina-where both legak re�iew and then apprv�als had 9 been granted- frQm bath the Gity vf Cupertino and the SCVWD, I wauld like fv file a cvmplaint with the State vf Califarnia overseeing ihe draft EIR for the Apple 2 Campus,now heing completed this manth by the City of Cuperiino,please consider this as one of my written submission,my public comment,as part of that EIR draft re�iew process. Thank you. Keith Mur�hy Cupertino Resident Letter ID 50a15� Lett C107 Name Stephen Rahde Address 927 E Hamestead Rci City,5tate Zip Sunnyvale,CA Sunnyvale Email efi8sm@yahoo.eom 5uhject Planted Median�n E. Hamestead Road Comment Let me first state that my wife and I are nof opposed to the new Apple Campus 2 across the street,or the cEosure of Pruneridge A�enue,which will significantly increase the trafflc on E. 1 Homestead Road from Lawrence Expressway to Wolfe Road. However,the 4ast Apple hrochure shows a planted medisn running down Homestead Road. 5ince gates 5-6-7 af the old HP complex will be eliminated,someone in their grea#wisdom thinks that a turn lane is no longer necessary. Now,a tree line rrtedian may look nice,but did anyone consider the incon�enience to the Sunnyvale hameowners being able to get in or out of their own driveways7 It you want to head east toward Lawrence Expressway you 2 would ha�e fo go up to Wolfe to make the L!turn.And each time to turn into your driveway you would have to go down to Tantau to make the U turn.This is ahsurd, and !am totally appQSed to rema�ing the turn lanes. If I ha�e to ga ta all my neighbvrs ta get a petitian to stop this [will do it. AEsa, it is bad enough that a median is planned, but the bra�hure shaws trees planted in it. A tree planted in a small med€an in 10 years will have raised the pa�ement,and will ha�e to 3 be removed.Then there is the maintenance of pruning and watering etc.This is nat a practical idea. The�est possihle solution to the traffic prohlem wvuld have been a direct vff ramp from 28a into the Apple campus. With the�losure of Pruneridge the traffc will dramatically in�rease on Hvmestead between Tantau and Wolfe with those people who want to a�cess 28fl. 50, 4 put the money thai would be spent on the pfanted median dQwn Homestead towards a better soiution to the traffic prablerr�that wiil be created on Fiomestead. Piease re�onsider t�e planned median on E. Hamesteaci Road. It is nat a gaod idea or I 5 worth the cast. Lett C108 Letter I� 5afl153 Name Ria Lo Address Clty,5tate Zip 5unnyva3e, CA Email 5ubject one more comment Comment Publlc easements along the#our sides of the carr�pus One more comment:Given the very bad traffic impacts, I would suggest that Apple provide pub[ic easements to facilitate pedestrians and cyclists tra�el along the 1 landscaped portions af its campus rather than on the b�sy streets.This means that the security fen�es will be moved further away from the raad and closer to the spaceship so that the public can enjoy new pathways and get some payback for the terrible traffic. Lett C109 LetterlD 5QQ152 Name Meite Christensen Address 10fl95 Judy Ave City,State Zip Cupertino, CA 95014 Email silikonen@gmail.�om 5uhje�t Apple EIR Report Cammen#s and Concerns Camment Regarding the E1Ft repart and comrnentslcancerns about the Apple project. As a clase neighbor on Judy Avenue, my biggest interest and concern is the irnpact on the local area with the new Apple Campus,Main Street Cupertino and the current Loree businesses. Haw is the city making sure that all the traftic{bicycles, pedestrians and vehiclesJ will be managed and best served with different parties that have to work tagether for ihe loca�area ta not end up as a traffi�nighimare.With se�eral buildings already o�cupied the local area has already seen an immense in�rease in traffic that has impact Qn day to day a�tivities.This before the Main 5treet has even started to be implemented and the Apple Campus not�lose to even have the future number of employees. With lo�al businesses and residenis sa really c€ose, I sin�erely hope that the city will make sure to praje�t rnanage and require de�elopers to pro�ide adequate infrastru�ture im�rovements to off set the immense impact to the lacal area around Tantaul5tevens Creek.Addltianally, [would like to make sure that the�ity has a master plan that in�olves not only Apple and Main 5treet projects but Eake inta account the Loree business and 1 parking issues, highlmiddle and elementary s�hool traffi�issues in the Tantaul5tevens Creek area and impact to residents.This will ha�e to work with pedestrian crossings, bicycle lane impro�ements,sidewalk implementation on the south side of 5te�ens Creek between Tantau and Judy Avenue,bus stops, red light flow etc.With t�e 5anta Clara affice building construction on the�orner of Ste�ens Creek and 28fl off ramp,impa�t will be immense and would be really appreciated if the city will make sure to update residents to overall plans for this area and not just�ount on de�elopers making it happen. Will the city provide traffic measures on surface streets outside of the Apple Campus impact area so that Judy and Bret will be pravided with speed bumps to slow down the increased thrqugh traffic? Even Calvert would benefit frpm speed reducing measures for fhrough traffic. Will the city leverage their impact an state and caunty traffi�jurisdictions sa that the on ramp on Calvert A�enue ta sauth bound 28Q can be changed ac�arding to the EIR and suggested measures to help impro�e tra�Fi�f€ow? There are several sections where tree removal are listed as a potential impact. I have not been a�le ta find further inFormation abaut impact of tree removal and what trees focated exa�tly where is listed. Could already be listed-but as mentioned this doesn't appear to 2 be easy to locate. Eit�er please point to location or ex�lain what trees could be removed on Tantau due to widening of road close to Wallca Parkway intersectian as wel!as on Tantau close to the Homestead intersectian. I would like ta make sure thaE there is an easy way ta contact the city wit�con�erns, questions etc from now and thraughaut The canstru�tion in order for residents to get info, submit camplaints and get clarification on issues that might arise.Currently,the AppEe 3 outreach naighhorhoad graup has�een responding ta questions etc-however,going farward the�ity should have an easy access point sa that its residents can rea�h a city offi�e to get updatas,su�mit complaints etc. Lett C109 cont. Please find befow seciions from the EIR Report linked to questians and concerns addressed above.some ot the images that I wanted to include cannat be pasted into this 4 farm Please make sure to contact me with any questions Mette Christensen 10D95 Judy Avenue, Cupertino,CA 95014 4�8 348 3637 Int.21,Wolfe Roadl!-28a Northbound Ramps{Cupertina} Int.31.Tantau AvenuelVallco Parkway [Cupertino} Int.36. Ste�ens Creek 8oule�ardlCaivert Dri�ell-�80 Ramps{west}{GMP} Impact TRANS-2: Under Exist€ng pius Project Conditions,completion of the praposed praject would cause lntersection#31 Tantau AvenueJValfco Parkway to a�erate at an unacceptable level {�hange from La5 C to L�5 E+)during the AM�eak hour based on City af Cupertino L05 impact thresholds.{5} Mitigatian Measure TRANS-2:At fntersection#31 Tantau AvenueNall�o Parkway,the project spar�sar SY�all construct an exclusive north�ound through lane{for a total of ane left-turn lane, one through lane,and ane shared throughlright-turn lane}, and a receiving lane on the north side of the intersection which woufd impro�e interse�tion operations to acceptable LOS C {26.1 secands}. The proposed mitigation measure could have secondary impacts to the trees along the east side of Tantau A�enue.The roadway wauld need to be widened to the east,ta provide fnr a 5 bike lane to the right of the travel lane and the sidewalk adjacent to the bike lane. Secondary impacts assaciated with the removal of trees that ara protectad under fhe City of Cupertino's Tree Protection�rdinan�e could accur with the identified mitigation measure. fmpacts BIQ-1 and 810-3 in 5ection V.D, Biological Resources in DEIR addresses these patential secondary impa�ts.{L7SJ Impact TRANS-3: Under Existing plus Praject Conditions, completion of the praposed proje�t would cause interseclion#36 5te�ens Creek Baule�ardlCal�ert Qrivell-28� Ramps {westJ to operate a#an una�cepTable le�el �change from LOS Q ta LOS FJ during the PM peak hour based on CMP guideline. �5} Mitigation Measure TRANS-3:At intersection#35 5tevens Creek 6aulevardlCal�ert Drivell- 28a Ramps[west},the praject sponsor shall canstruct an exclusive eastbound rig�t-turn lane (for a tatal of three thraugh lanes and one right-turr�IaneJ and provide an east�ound right -turn overlap phase.This would improve intersect€on operatians ta acceptable LOS E+.To accommodate the added lane the existing b�ffer between the roadway and sidewalk would need to be eliminated and the sidewalk pushed�los�r to the existir�g fence on the south side af Lett C109 cont. 5tevens Creek Boulevard.This mitigation measure wauld alsa require relocation af an existing sireetlight, fire hydrant, and utility pote. This intersection is a CMP intersection and is IocaFed withirt the City of 5anta Clara. It is also under Ca[trans jurisdiction. The project sponsor wauld be required to caordinate with the �ity of 5anta Clara and Caltrans to construct Ehe identified physical improvement at the Ste�ens Creek 6oulevardlCalvert Dri�ell-280 Ramp{west}intersection.5ince this intersection is ❑utside of the City of Cupertino'S jurisdictian,the City cannot guarantee that the irr�provement would be canstructed. For this reasan the impact wauld remain significant and unavoidable. (Sll} Int. 31.Tantau AvenuelVallco Parkway{Cupertino}:the addition of project traffic would degrade intersection operations from ac�eptable LaS G to unacceptable L05 E+ during the AM peak hour. Int. 32.Tantau Avenuel5tevens Creek eaulevard�CupertEno}:the addition of�raject traffic would degrade intersectian operations from a�ceptable L�5�ta unacceptable L05 E-during the PM peak hour. Int. 36. 5tevens Creek 6oulevardlCal�ert�rivell-280 Ramps [west] {5anta Clara]:the addition of project traffic would exacerbate unac�eptaUle LQS F operations during the PM peak hour. The projec#wouEd exa�erbate unacceptable conditions or cause unacceptable operating �anditions at the following interse�tians,and these changes wouEd be�onsidered a signifi�ant impact. 5 Int. 5. �e Anza BaulevardlHomestead Road{Cupertino} COnt. Int. 21.Wolfe Roadll-28�Northbound Ramps{CupertinaJ Int. 27.Tantau AvenueJHomestead Road �Cupertir�o} Int. 31.Tantau AvenuelVall�o Parkway{Cupertino} Int. 32.Tantau Avenuel5te�ens Creek 8oulevard{Cupertino} Int. 36. Stevens Creek BaulevardlCal�ert Drivell-28� Ramps (west} {CMP7 Int.4fl. Stevens Creek BoulevardlLawrence Expressway Ramps �east} [CMP} Int. 41. Lawrence Expresswayll-28a 5outhbound Ftamps{CMP} Impact TRANS-6: Under Background plus Project Conditians,comple#ion of the propased project would cause intersection#27 Tantau A�enuelHomestead Road to operate at an u nacceptaUle le�el �change from L�5 0+to L05 E}during the AM peak haur based on City of Cupertinp L05 impa�t thresholds. (5} Mit€gation Measure TRANS-5:At interse�tion#27 Tantau A�enuelHomestead Road the proje�t spansor shall consfru�i an ex�lusi�e right-turn lane from eastl�aund Homestead Road to southbound Tantau Avenue{for a total af one eastbound leit-turn lane,two eastbound through lanes,and or�e eastbound right-turn Eane},which would improve in#ersection aperatians ta acceptable L�S �- �52.6 seconds}. With the mitigation measure idenfified a6ave,secandary impacts associated with the removal of trees could accur.Trees are protected under the City af Cupertino's Tree Protection Ordinance. Impacts Bl0-1 and eID-3 in Se�tion V.�,eiolagical Resources addresses these potential secandary impacts related ta potential tree remaval. [LTS) Impa�t 7RANS-T: Under Background plus Project Gonditions,cam�letion of the proposed Lett C109 cont. project would cause intersection#31 Tantau A�enuelVallco Parkway Eo operate at an unacceptable le�el [�hange frarn L�5 C to LpS E*}during the AM peak hour based on City af Cupertino LD5 impact thresholds. [S} Mitigation Measure TRANS-7:At interse�tion#31 Tantau AvenueNallco Parkway,the project spansor shail impiement Mitigation Measure TRANS-2 �add exctusive northbound throug� lane},which would improve intersection�perations to acceptable LQS C{28.7 seconds}. �LTS} Impact TRANS-8:Under Background plus Project Conditions,completion af the propased projecE would cause intersection#32 Tantau Avenuel5te�ens Creek 6oulevard ta ❑perate at an unacceptable le�el [change from L05 D to LaS E-J during the PM peak hour based on Ciry�t Cupertino LQ5 impa�t thresholds. (S} Mitigatian Measure7RANS-$:At interse�tian#32 Tantau AvenueJStevens Creek Boulevard, the prv�ec#spvnsor shall construct a 1 pQ-foat exclusi�e southbound right-turn lane (fvr a tatal af two southhound leit-turn lanes and one southbound right-turn lane},with associated improvemenFs in the right-of-way,which would impro�e interse�tian operations to acceptable L05 ❑ �46.8 seconds]. {LT5] Impact TRANS-9:�Jnder Background plus Project Conditions,completion of the propased project would exa�erbate unacceptable aperations of intersection#3fi 5te�ens Creek 5 BAUlevardl Cafvert Qri�ell-280 Ramps[west}during t�e PM peak haur based on CMP guidelines. COnt. [57 Mitigatian Measure TRANS-9a:At fntersection#36 Stevens Creek 8oule�ardlCalvert ❑rivell- 28� Ramps{west},the proje�t sponsor shall implement MitigatiQn Measure TRANS-3 [add exclusive eastbound right-turn[ane},which wouid improve interse�tion operatians to 112.2 secands[LQ5 F}. Howe�er,the Stevens Creek Bou[evardlCalvert�rivell-284 Ramps {west} intersection would continue to operate unacceptably. Providing a secand right-turn iane would improve intersection operatians to L�S E with fi3.0 secands of delay. However,there are righ#of- way canstraints that render a second right-turn lane in{easible,sin�e there would be less than 7 feet af right-of-way availabie between the fence and curb on the south side of Steven Creek after implementation of Mitigatifln Measure TRANS-3.At minimum, 11 feet af right-of-way are needed to accommodate a second right-turn fane. Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b:The praject sponsor shall expand the ToM program to reduce Fhe severity of the impact per the TDM Program Expansian subsection. In�reasing the T�M participation and associated aliernative mode share from�8 percent to 34 percent would improve operations ta L�5 F{142.8 se�onds}without implementatian of TRANS-3; howe�er it would not reduce the impact to a less-tt�an-significant level.A robust monitaring program has been identified in the TDM Program Expansion subsection and shall be required to ensure that this TDM program mitigation measure is implemented and that the required trip reduction Lett C109 cont. is achieved. ❑etails of the TDM prQgram are discussed in the TDM Program Expansion subsection. �SUJ lmpact TRANS-11: Under Backgraund plus Project Conditions,completion of the propased proje�f would cause operations of intersection#41 Lawrence Expresswayll-PS� 5outhbound Ramps to operate at an unacceptable le�el �change from LpS E to L05 F}during the PM �eak hour based on CMP guidelines. (S} Mitigatian Measure TRANS-1�:At intersection#41 Lawren�e Expresswayll-28a South�aund Ramps,the project spansor shall canstruct an excfusive eastbaund through lane{for a total oi ❑ne shared left-turnithrough lane,ane through lane,and ar�e right-turn lane},which wauld imprave intersection operations to acceptable L05 E+{56.9 seconds}.The mitigation measure would require the construction of a new retaining wall along I-280,since Calvert Raad wauld need to be�urved to properly align with two receiving lanes at the on-ramp.There is existing righi-of-way to accommodate this mitigation measure. However,ihe measure would require wider�ing the existing bridge that crosses the creek running parallel to the west side of Lawrence Expressway. Any widening af the bridge st�all be designed to avaid impa�ts to the creek channel and riparian vegetation. 7his interse�tion is a CMP interse�tion an a County expressway and portions are likely within Caltrans right-of-way.7he proje�E sponsar would�e required to caardinate with VTA, the 5 County af 5anta Clara, and other responsib�e agen�ies to construct the identified COnt. physi�al impravement at the Lawrence Expresswayll-28a Ramps intersectian. 5ince this intersection is outsicfe of the City af Cupertino's jurisdiction,the City cannat guarantee that it wauld be Tantau Avenue Evaluation.The project would construct two new signalized intersections on Tantau Avenue.The�rimary new signal would be the sscond major proje�t driveway {#29}, located approximafely 7DD feet south of the existing#28 Tantau AvenuelPruneridge Avenue intersection. Additionally,a signal is pro�osed at the egress point ta the Transit Center north of the Pruneridge Avenue intersection (#28}.The V1551M analysis was used to e�aluate twa questions related to the Tantau Avenue carridor: „h How would the addition of the new signafized intersections on Tantau Avenue affect operations af the carridor? „h How would the changes in lane-drapsladditions affect corridar operations? The VI551M microsimulatian results to these two items are discussed below. Added 5ignalized Intersections.The results of the VlSSIM analysis shaw that 7antau Avenue would aperate acceptahly with the added intersections. Tantau A�enuelVall�o Parkway intersection. A significant amount of queuing would o��ur ln the southbound direction with the existing geometries at the#31 Tantau AvenuelVallco Parkway intersection.Adding a right-turn lane on southbound Tantau Avenue at Vall�o Parkway would redu�e vehicle congestion and queuing an southbound Tantau A�enue.Table V.I-15 Lett C109 cont. summarizes the travel time results without and with the recommended improvement far southbound vehicles from the Tantau A�enue main campus driveway ta Vallca Parkway. Table V.1-15: PM Peak Hour Travel Times on 5outhbound Tantau Avenue Sauthbound Tantau Avenue Geometries at Vali�o Parkway{#31} 5hared ThraughlRight-Turn Lane Dedicated Right-Turn Lar�e $:24 4:21 Notes: a Travel time from Tantau Avenue main campus driveway to west af Tantau A�enuelVallco Parkway intersection. Saur�e:Fehr&Peers, May 2Q13. There wauld be a substantial increase in travel time and delays without the addition of a dedicated sauthbaund right-turn lane at the#31 Tantau AvenueNallco Parkway intersection. Evaluation of Bicycle Facilities.Similar to the pedestrian enhancements, the project would provide se�eral new facilities around and in the immediate�i�ini#y of the project site to imprave k�icycle access.The main bicy�le improvements would be located along Wolfe Road ar�ci Tantau Avenue between Hamestead Road and Vallco Par{cway as well as Ehe north side of Va�lco Parkway between Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue.The bicy�le improvements include: „h Adding or providing 3�uffered bike lanes; 5 „h Installing intersection crossing markings through major fntersections along Wolfe C011t. Road; „h Installing striped green bike lanes thrnugh critical areas of patential�ehi�ular conflict; and „h Installing bike boxes andJor two-stage turn queue boxes for; �Sauthbaund left-turns from Wolfe Road anto east�ound Pruneridge Avenue; � Westb�und left-turns from Pruneridge Avenue anto south�ound Tantau Avenue;and > Northbound left-turns from Tantau Avenue into the Tantau 5e�urity Re�eption oppasiFe Pruneridge A�enue. In addition,the project would modify the Walfe Road and Tantau Avenue I-28D o�ercrossings to enhance bicycle crossings at the treeway interchange.The propased praject would maintain allexisting bicycle facilities in the study area,with the exceptinn of the bike lanes on Pruneridge A�anue. 8icycle access impacts due to the closure of Pruneridge A�enue are discussed in a later section.The propased bicycle enhancements are considered adequate;na other mitigatian measures are required. Condition of Appraval GA-TRAIVS-�:Apple shall fund neighbarhood cut-through traifi� monitoring studies and pravide fees to implement needed traffi�calming improvements to minimize neighbflrhoad cut-through traffi�.The Gity af 5anta Clara and City of 5unnyvale Traffic Calming Programs should be considered when evaluating traffic calming measures. Based on�on�ersations with the two cities,Apple shall pro�ide up ta$25�,4flfl far the Ciiy Of Santa Clara and up to$5�0,00�far ihe City of 5unny�ale for neighbarhood cut-through improvements and parking intrusian measures[see CA-TRANS-3}. Emacs! Ernacs! Lett C109 cont. The City of Cupertino has established that a signifi�ant impa�t would ❑ccur if the proje�t waulcf permanently in�rease ambient exterior noise le�els by more than 3 dBA over le�els existing without the project as measured at noise sensiti�e receptors in the project�i�inity. The greatest increase in noise under existing �onditions would be a�.5 d8A in�rease in traffic noise le�els along Tantau Avenue from Tanclem Qri�e fo Vallca �arkway under Existing Plus Project canditions. This increase would not be perceptible i� an autdoor environment and is below the significan�e threshoid of a greater than 3 dBA in�rease. Based on these results, proje�t-related traffi�noise levels waulcf not result in a permanent significant increase in ambient noise le�els compared to those existing without the project.Thus, project-related traffi� noise impacts on off-site sensitive land uses would not exceed the City's sign€fi�an�e �riteria and would therefore �e less than signifi�ant. 5tationary Noise. As discussed in the impa�t analysis dis�ussion for the first signifi�an�e criterian, 5 abo�e, noise levels from deli�ery loading and unloading a�ti�ities at the proposed Phase � cont. 6uildings east of IVorth Tantau Avenue woufd be similar to what is currently experienced at these land uses from existing delivery a�tivity operations on the project site.All ❑ther proje�t deEivery laading artd �anloacling areas would accur in the project's �andergroUncf parking structures, and would theretore not affect sensitive receptors in the project�icinity.Theretore, project-relafed defivery loading and unloading activities would not result in a signifi�ant in�rease in ambient noise levels and this impact would 3�e less than significant. 5imilarly, noise from new mechani�ai noise sources, in�luding the proposed Central Plant as welf as HVAC systems would be reduced to t�elow the existing ambient t�ackground noise levels tdue primarily to distance attenuation and design features, such as walls, insulated doors, and noise attenuated ventilation shaftsJ.Therefore, as project-related me�hanical equipment stationary noise so�rces would not exceed existing ambient noise le�els af recei�ing sensitive land uses, this impact woulr�be �onsidered less than significant. Emacs! Lett C110 Letter ED 5�0151 Name Ria La Address City,State Zip Sunnyvale, CA 94087 Email 5ubject Comment Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Apple 2 ❑EIFt. I am a resident af 5unnyvale's Chateau West neighborhaod,which is two blo�Ks away from the App1e 2 campus. I am also a professional planner with a Pha from the University of Cali#ornia, 1 Berkeley in transportation planning. My main professional and research interesis are sustainable transporfation,walkability planning and muftimodaEism. I have se�en basic �omments aut�ined below, followed by same references for the nurr�bers that [quate. 1. Spaceship design is interesting I appreciate the in#eresting spaceship design of Apple 2 and believe that an iconic design is appropriate for Apple's Headquarters. It will also tend to pro�ide a fo�al point for iourist traific to the 5ilicon Valley area.This tourist interest and travei shauld be considered in 2 t�ath the transportation impact analysis as welf as area-wide planning. [n part�cular,there is a need to consider how to aclivate the street by creating a mare visually interesting, engaging and human-s�aEed experience;and hy reducing tratfic and street widths. {The p�ans for expanding Cupertina Viffage,which is currently d�signed as a dawdy retail blacK inside a sea of parking,should also take this into account.y At present,the �]EIR is focused on commuter trips and overlooks effects on ambient traific in terms af both tourist trips and mors circuitous travel patterns created by the I 3 superbloc€c campus. 2. Made splits don't match parking provision 7he DEIR indi�ates that 10,934 parking spa�es will be provided. For a campus population of 14,2�0 emp[ayees,this represents an expectation that�3°l0 of employees will use alternative modes{i.e.everything other ihan driving alone}. 4 This rate o#parking provision is a lat lower fhan the status quo rate of 28°Io alternative made share and much lower than the DEIR goal of 34°la alternati�e made share.What this discrepan�y means is that the prapasa! has toa much parking. If the de�eloper is provfdes this�nuch parking,ft will en�aurage more people to drive alone to work. 3. Mode splits are woefulEq ur�ambitious Authors of the ❑EIR suggest that the reader compare Apple's projected alternative mode share to that of the wider county. Much of 5anta Clara County is lower density than this neigY�barhood and is completely inaccessible by public transit or walking.This camparisan is there#are a ridi�ulously law t�ar to use! 5 Please instead compare Apple's goal of 34°Io alternative mode share ta a�ouple of other �orporate ar research�ampuses in the vicinity: •Stanford University achieves a 46°Io aiternative mode share fQr faculty,staff and administrators,and an impressive 88°Io alternative mode share for students! •Genentech achie�es a 44°lo alternative mode share for its commuiers. 4.Traffi�and related impacts are completely unacceptable I 6 Lett C110 cont. A failure of the city and company to aim for anything close to these le�els will cause Apple great expense in terms of excessive parking costs. It will also produce unaccepta�le envirpnmental impaGts on the locaa�ommunity in terms of increased traffi� volumes, increased traffic delay, air pollution emissions,lass of street life,community severance.loss of pedestrian a�enity, and#7atential loss of life and liml7 fram fraffic safety impacts. The LQS grades forecast in the DEIR are completely unacceptable.Apple proposed to 6 address these problems by rnodifying roads through road widening. Consider sending a small child acrass Walfe Road. Even at pedestrian signals,the road cont. is already excessi�ely wide to[he point that it produces cammunity severance effects and serious safety concerns for more vulnerable road users.Widening this road e�en further is not an accepfable safution. The mitigations are therefore simultaneously�nrealistic and unambitious. It is N�T acceptable to widen raads that are already excessively wide,and to close roads that are used by the lacal community and 6usiness customers. 5.Current incenti�e Ea dri�e and the need far parking-�as�-out ❑ne mitigation that is currently inadequate is excessive free parking that gives Apple employees an incentive ta drive to work. This problem is�artly created by the City of Cupertino which provides minimum parking standards far mQSt deve€apments and parking guidelines for Planned ❑evelopments fhat are based on the status quo parking ratio.As a result of high minimum parking standards and status quo guidelines.em�loyers like Apple are discouraged from striving toward 7 more ambitious rr�ode shares since they have to constru�t parking at the status quo rate anyway.Also,employees are encouraged to dri�e afone to work;VTA transit ridership is undermined;and residents of both Cupertino and Sunnyvale suifer the consequen�es of poor regional access,poor air quality and pervasive traffic congestion. In any�ase.Apple's current pricing structure for parking and alternati�e transportation is too intlexible and too iaw. For example,thase who commute#o Apple by bicycle receive a $20 subsidy per month. By camparisQn, Genente�h's parking-cash-out program provides $4 per day{in 2006}ta all employees who commute to work by alternative modes o#any sort. B.Cupertino Village south entrance should remain open The mitigation strategy of closing the west entry to Cupertino Village will result in more extreme traffic on the norih side of this shopping�enter alQng Homestead Road. Both entrances are extensively used by customers to Cupertino Village{particularly on weekends and evenings when Apple employees will not even be around7. It is impQrtant that the�ampus camplemer�ts rather than undermines the success of local g businesses.This entrance ta Cupertino Village should rernain open. Furthermore, Appie could allow Cupertino Vilfage ta share its parking lot{for a fee] on the west side of the campus on weekends. This situation is exa�er�ated by the fact that Cupertino Village is also pfanning to undergo expansion.Has#his cumulative eifect has not besn taken into accaunt? 7. Pruneridge should remain open Part of the existing traffic prablem in this area is�aused by superblock style which tends to siphon all traffi�onto wide main raads.thereby reducing pedestrian amenity and safely. 9 Apple 2 proposes to exacerbate this problem by closing Pruneridge Road and�realing an even larger superblack.This road cl�sure is unacceptabEe because it reduces Lett C110 cont. pedestrian, bicycle and vehi�ular connectivity in the neighborhood. It also in�reases the 9 need for Iocal residents to use cars in order to reach shops or serr�ices,thereby COnt. increasing ambient Eraffi�canditians. Re#ere nces: 'Stanford Universi#y mode shares are from Sustainability Tracking Assessment and Rating 5ystem https:llstars.aashe.arglinsfitutianslstanford-university-calreport12012-06- 291�PItranspartationlOP-i61 and hftps:llstars.aashe.orglinstitutionslstanford-university- calreportl2�12-�fi-2910 Pltransportatio nIQP-151 ' GenenteCh mode shares are(rom the Genentech Annual Report 2a13 http:ll�i-ssf- 1� ca.granicus.camlMetaViewer.php?view_id=4&cfip_id=660&meta_id=48906 " Evidence to support the argument about too much free parking comes from Donald 5houp's book on The High Cos#at Free Parking `lnformation on the Genentech Parking Cash-Out prograrn cames from the website of Nelson Nygaard,whers I used ta work�disclosureJ http:llwww.nelsonnygaard.comlDocumentslQuals-Project-ProfileslNNproj-GENEIVTECN- Parking-and-�rans.pdf Lett C111 Letter l❑ 500149 Name Syl�ia Gallegos Address City,5tate Zip Cupertino,CA 95�1A Email Suhject pEIR GammentslQuestions RE:Apple Headquarters Comment Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The Cupertina Administratian shouEd recommend to the City Cauncil that it establish a Citizen Oversight Committee for the Mitigation Monitoring and Repvrting Pragram.The Cvmmittee members �vuld be appainted by t�e City Coun�il.The purpvse of the Citizen Qversight Committee would be 1 re�iew{quarterly}the status af the implerrtentatian of Yhe mitigatian measures and monitor comp[iance with the conditions of appro�al. For example,the EIR proposes that"peak trip caunts" trigger implementaf€an of TDNE measures.The Citizen d�ersight Committee should re�iew this data and status of the TQM measures. Reduced Density Proje�t A[ternative Did the City direct the E{R consultant to undertake the same Transportation Impact AnaEysis of the transportation impacts resulting fram a Reduced Density Project Alternative sa that residents and policymakers�an directfy campare Fhe transportation impa�ts from the proposed project to the 2 project alternative?IF nvt,why not?Many of the propased mitigativn measures for the transportation impa�ts are outside vf the autharity oi the City and,thus,the impacts remain signifi�ant and una�oidable. Bicy�Ee Transpartation Facilities If the City desires to encaurage alternative commute vptivns fvr Apple(and other emplvyers}, has the City or will the City consider installing No Parking afong Milfer Avenue south af Ste�ens Creek Bl�d.ta Calle de 8arcelona in arder fo instafl Ciass fi bike lanes in both directions7 You will not 3 enovurage Apple employees to cammute by bioycle from the sfluth of oampus without dedicated bicycle transportatiQn facilities tt�ere. It is currently dangerous to bicycle vn Miller an that stretch. Will the City propose a condition of approval requiring Apple to charge for parking to provide an incentive for employees ta bicycle or use a shuttle7 The proposed bicycling commute target from 2°Io 4 to 5°/o will not make an appreciable difference in reducing L05 impacts at the nearf�y interse�tions. TDM Measures Google has a fleet of vehicles{efe�tric and hybrid}a�ailable an campus for those emplayeas who use transiUshuttle ta commute to work so that if these employees ha�e to use a vehi�le during the day for an amergency ar ather need{doctar�isit7,they still are not required to drive to work. 5 Will the City Administrativn r,ansider a TpM measure that involves Apple procuring park-and-rfde Ivts away from the�ampus and using shuttles between the oampus and these lots?{There appear tv be shuttles for transif users,but not for dri�ers.) ❑pen 5pacelPubli�Park How did tha City determine that a 1.7 acre puhlic park was adequate mitigation for the loss of open spa�e resulting from the praject?Is it a formula that is applied per a�reage Iost? Any puhlic park established to mitigate the loss of open space frnm the project should be located in the�i�inity af fhe project. �The mitigation measure should be rele�ant to the en�ironmental impact, 6 praportionate ta the impact,and be in the�i�inity.)The mitigation measure aption to"agree to purchase,designate,and dedicate to fhe City 1.1 acres elsewhere in the City as Parks and apen 5pace . . . provided the land wauld be publicly accessible"should not 6e an optian. Cupertinp residents along Faothill Expressway,far example,should not benefit from a neighharhood park due to the impacts residents in east Cupertino ara experiencing. Lett C112 Letter I❑ 54�147 Name Wahi[a Wilkie Address 6295 5hadygro�e Ct City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA 95014 Email wahilaw@gmail.com Subject Traffic associated with new apple campus Comment ! am very concerned about the increase in traffic in the area arvund the proposed Appfe 2 campus and the cl4sing of a sectian af Pruneridge A�e. As mitigation far the traffc issue I suggest ha�ing Apple pay for electric school huses to serve all schools in the affe�ted areas tfl reduce the number of cars on Wplfe and Tantau 1 and compensate for the in�reased air pollution from additlon Apple commuters. 1 also suggest that the closure o�{Pruneridge Ave. be denied and fhat Apple�e required to purchase a piece of land in the area, pay for it to be converted to a park and dorsate that to the citizens of�upertino. Lett C113 Letterl❑ 500145 Name Marialis 5eehom Address 1a53 Kildare City,State Zi{� Sunny�+ale,CA 94D87 Email mseeham@juno.com 5ubject Apple Campus Populatian Comment Access routes{N15#28Q.Wolfe and Homestead Rds.cannot support access to same 140�0 employees on a daily basis during�ommute hours without severe�onsequences. Even assuming 80°Io will use mass transitlbi�ycies,will require more than 1fl0�buses daily and 3�OD additional�ars resulting in traffic gridlock on#28a,Wolfe and Homestead Rds. 1 Birdlandl5unny�ale residents will be denied ac�ess to these�onduits.Can't someone do the math????. Limit the Apple headquarter employee papulation ta 4,aflD. Cupertino can stilf re�eive its tax re�enue, but 5unny�ale residents will he able to get in and out of their neigh bor�oads. Lett C114 Letter IQ 50fl144 Name Rabert Neff Address 3150 Emerson 5t City, 5tate Zip Palo Alto,CA Pala Alta Email ro�e�t@neffs.net 5ubject 6iGycle facilities on Tantau in Apple Camp�s 2 DEIR Camment In regarci to fhe Apple Campus 2 E�R. In general I arrz concerned with bicy�ling issues on Tantau and Pruneridge. I bicycle on these roads daily to commute to work,and to get around Cupertina, Sunnyvale, and 5anta 1 Clara. First of all,l"ar�tau is an impartant connecting street in the bicy�le network going from 5unnyvale and Santa Clara into Cupertino. It is a relatively quiet street, �ut it makes the connection across highway 28fl witho�t a freeway inter�hange,so it is�ery suitable for 6icy�ling. Beyond#he Apple Campus 2 site it continues as Tantau [in Cupertino}and Quail (in Sunny�ale}, connecting antv law�alurne neighborhaod streets which are ideal far bi�ycling. It is im�ortant tv maintain Tantau as a low-stress st�eet for bicycling. Currently there are bike lanes on Tantau from Hor-r�estead to Ste�ens Creek. 2 The pian suggests rernoving hike lanes where Tantau crosses Calabazas Creek, replacing them with a shared bikelped facility a#fhat point.This is a had idea,artd a definite downgrade far the bike facility. I think it wauld be bett�r ta either narrow or reduce lanes, widen the bridge, or add a pedesfrian bridge on one side so that bike lanes could be maintained the full length of Tantau,and nat ahruptPy introduce a shared bikelped lane in the middle of that sectian. E�an a minimum,5 faot bike lane and 5 foot sidewa€k woufd be betfer than the proposed 10 foot shared space. This proposal is illustrated in Figure II1-17c, page 57 in the Plan Description document. A second comment is that at the carner nf Homestead and Tantau, going soutY�on Tantau, the lane is constricted by the pork-chop island at that point.This is illustrated in Fig III-20c. Any�yclists going through that,either from Quai!anto Tantau,ar turning left fram Homestead must share the iane all the way through the in#ersection. It would he better to remave ar red�ce the width of the park-chap isEand on SW�arner, sa that bvth a traffic lane and a bike lane could fit at that poinf. This would make the intersec#ion safer for bicyclists heading south an Tantau from that paint. This would be a b�neiicial improvement ior 3 bicyclists using the site, and far other cyclists as well. It is worth considering modernizing that intersection by completely removing the right turn pork-chop island from Homestead anto Tantau.This generally makes intersections safer for hoth pedestrians and cyclists,and the pork-chop does not add mu�h e�cien�y in heavy traffc situations. Lett C115 Letter I� 5DD143 Name Tammy Mangelfi Address 686 Grand Coulee Ave#4 City,5tate Zip Sunnyva[e,CA 94087 Email Notara1214@aol.com Subject Apple Campus Comment We do not want any more trafFc where the Apple Campus is going to�e located. It is already congested as it is!!Apple needs to hus in their people and pra�ide busing for our schaals!!Where are all of these people going to go??Dtherwise,ga ta anather city on the 1 east side. Lett C116 Letterl0 5�D142 Name Ray Crump Address Z17D1 5te�ens Creek Bl�d#634 City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA Cupertino Email raaaaaydan�aal.com 5u bject Comment As a persan invalved with the development of Cupertino starting back in i958 I am seripusly cancerned that we do our best when we make majpr changesladditipr�s ta the �ommunity. I know we've prized the creation our 2 IQCai school boys started and wo�ld hope that this majar project will be a positive creation. TrafficlCirculation...that is my�on�ern. i'm not an expert an traffic so I'll leave the salutions needed to the experts and the cities of Cupertino and 5unnyvale to salve the dilemma. 1 Db�ious{y highways outside the jurisdiction of the�ities will need to he considered and rnay require cooperatian. I da remember when VaklcA was proposed that one requiremen# in�alved an overpass being created to accommadate anticipated traffic. It appears there will need ta be some creati�e solutians and !laok forward ta their implementation. I trust Apple would not want to create a sifuatian that is not in the hest interest of the entire community. Lett D1 COMMENT CARD -- The information you provide is a public record and�vi!!be shared. '� -------- Name w► e � � Address s�c Z�.c !7S _ CUPERTINO City _��,-� l Gu. • zip._ ��g�� To viewthe DEIR Email please visit ---- Cupertina.org/ Comment subjeci(s) � AopleCampus2 I ha�e the following comments abo�t fhe Apple Campus 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR}: -�t� -¢ F � t� is [.�� .��.e �..� d � �.•e i�b�(eC�.�c�s ,2 -� � �--�-��---- � 1 ��,�c w;t j�;d.� �{-G.o��o�_��o�l .lo b� .. . -- APp1e 2-EI.R---- Qatw A�Blvdb ��ti� � �11N 2 � 2Q]3 — -- �' � — _ ❑ � • ��y ■ . �,-�printed on 50°/o recycled content n the back Lett COMMENT CARD D2 _____ _.__ __ . - .___ The information you provide is a public record and will be share� '� Name �G�lUftfa`5 _ r�lJUgc�'i- —. . Address ��.f�r,;� S� CUPERTINO City v�-fi�o c�?r4� 4S�trJS Zip -w"� To view fhe DEIR Elllall ��1Z�?!.I�.J�iG�-��J(Y 3 .� please visit Cupertino.orc�l Comment subject(s) AppleCampus2 I have the following comments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft Er��ironmentaf Impact Report(DEIR): �.(.c�Ni � �-Uz �o'7�.s��l./ r'.�-�v1��37"rr�lTl�1T a�lS L�C�� - �- �?'"Gcr� Ur'..G i2, i�� cru- rr� d� �2�J?s� r� ��c�7�----__w_t��'l�v�s ❑� '��"�❑� ��c�'I/''� �`� B-y..�. rs' ti �r,�- �' . 1 �C! c��'L.UY��7l .vcs�.tiJ ;�3los �l�s u,�S `�d�9d � � ��a'�7z.��it'i71`i2fL.S I cl h S ___ � � ❑■ ■ �� printed on 50% recycled content more space on the back �r��a ,Ur�s -� �,�y �lUs � �P�, !� Lett D3 COMMENT CARD The information you provide is a public record and wiN be shared Name � �� Address � � ^�G�'�� v� CUPERTINO Clty �OIL�G�I��irt'k7 ZI�7 �s�Z� TaviewtheDEIR Emall fl2s��'��T��• Gd� please�isit Cupertino.ora/ Comment subject(s)�� Aoo[eCampus2 I have th�following comments abo�t the Apple Campus 2 Draft En�ironmental Impact Report{DEIR): C�-�t � S��sk�,�+�`�-J �n,v,�,� o��r� ��3S 1�c�1 �� 1�..�� :� 5��,,� ' . 1 � v�c� �% � �� — L■�ti�[■] - � . 0 . . i,.�printed on 50% recycled content more space on the back Lett D4 COMMENT CARD The rnformation you provrde is a pubJic record and will be shared. -_'- --..._J._°-...... Name �. � � _ !!111�v Address `� � �� /��-�-� � CUPERTINO Clty Ci�� Zlp (/�� To�iew the DEIR Email v�!t�Q (� � � �� ,C, please visit Cupertina.orgl Comment sub�ect(s) AppleCampus2 I ha�e the following comments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft En�ironmental Impact Report(DEIR): ��!�%� C��'��_–�–I� -1�—��-z.i �►–�� -�a--�_ ,,_-�� _ �.�� w��,L � � ��z t�.v� T�, �� -�� ' 1 ., _�_—_�A�,PIe z�Iit �� — iv� . ` ��__.�_� � . � _._ _ --� ��2�-2013 —..�— .�.__ �._ __ � I� . �,�� printed on 50% recycled content mor�s b�a�k �:- :. � Lett D5 COMMENT CARD The informafion you provide is a public record and will be shared. .._�_.—....._—...- —_..._......_._.........----._._._ —.....—_. , Name �� ..5��' W� � CUPERTINO Address ''>a.�' <(�<a,-�--G.� ,r,�r� bi—✓�--��„ J, �^ City Zip�'_5�'3� To view the�EIR Email oL, ��.c��. c�0 ep3.� �ol pleasevisit Cupertino.or'c�/ Comment subject(s) — AppleCampus2 I,have the following comments about theApple Campus 2 Draft En�ironmental Impact Report(DEIR): .. "��.`�S �5 c� �r�$ .__�ro - � �( +� — e.u.r�r�►�.r fi��b.s a.w �. - ,'�L s ._�. ��-� �b b�-, _.��,ri�(.�.�� !`��C� • , �� .t ��S —�J��c n..a �`+� : �.,°�--�L+C a��ti. 1�,��1 � �_, -t'�f P . l�1,r�...v�-�..e.�..L��- 1 � ��r�I 9 -�•+�tl_l�[�,_ 1.J l Tk ate�ve�� 5 A J'��J _L"f` ��-�O rd,�--� ,.` �""r G�C�. f1�, -- I k I��I�� ❑�� ■ • °roe�ssed-hv � � �,-� printed on 50% re,�ycled cqntent , �—xn$r�s�aee-� Lett D6 C O M M E N T C A R D �q passa�oad [The rnformation you provide is a pu,blic record and wil!be share� E«z � � �n� IVame .. � v-- �-�. _ _ Address_,� Ranra�a Q UQERTINO b aa� Clty Z�p�� I3 Z a�ddyr To view the DEIR Email please visit Cupertino.org! Comment subject(s) Aop�eCampus2 I have the foflowing comments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft �nvironmenfal �mpact Report{DEIR): _ f � n�,.� t�� .��,��`��-.T� � � - �--�� 1 _�t��s� L��;—��-��cc� �j �� - ;L �" � �� E �,.�printed on 50% recycfed content more space on the back Lett D7 COMMENT CARD The ir�formation you provide is a public record and will be shared. Name � • 12 /•�T� 15 ! C Address to��.3 _.;Gu�....8�RT 5�'1�( ��2 . CUPERTINO �r---.-.�. .�- Clty G V Q°�r�,K, 1_.�� Zlp 9�O�� ___ To view the I�EIR �mail deS�0�� '�y q1M.C11�.o CO1�Y�_ please visit Cupertino.oral Comment subject(s} AopleCampus2 l have t�e foklowing comments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft �nvironmental Impact Report(DEtR): $u�� v�.q '1i�.�- ,�'P'PL�. eA�Pus2 �'Rov�A�s -n+� .L:oc,�tcd+tir�uN��r-y W t'r�a e�'�, �R AL pUTS'T�N�DINC, �DvPdt�.'T7�c4�S. �h'k� MJ4!N �{�fIW B�c�' lsTty-E c.��-rp.�i.1 ��Ft�Et�T ot� u�N 1�-oUl� T+R.AFFIG • �4ow wE� "�xti-�s� coN��N� 1 s'TU D E,D �9N� �D��L°3�S� �N TN� B U�[DlNC, pF �J-PPL� � cq-+t/�u5? co�lGD r� S�'2� M�77%�,Ds BE �!�G o}o�',� ? �C�"■ � Date Received' �'"^ R � . . ,� 2 6 2013 . �,��printed on 50% recycled content more space on the back ��btlG�t �� -�.,, ,,:s:�r. - Lett DS COMMENT CARD The information you provrde is a public recor�d and will be shared. '� _. _.__ __.. �...._�..... � , Name��_�q � � M�.�r�� `° �"•,��o��v,� �'�%��' Address�� `�� .�n�� o�� CUPERTINO City��y��i�___.__ Zip g t-1�J�� _ To V�ew ine oEiR � please�isit Email � �m��.�r.` �Q,�4�J�L} Cupertino.ora! Comment subject(s) ��v„S��`�� AppleCampus2 I ha�e the following comments about the Appfe Campus 2 Draft Environmental Impact R port(pEIR): �.�� , �, � �a. � �n 't,r1 �r �a,� ui� �`�°�__`�-��'�._ , ` o A� �s..i�o+/�i- 1 , �� `-.�aa��1 `�� '.\ `�� c, c�v� wC� ��`e��e� � �� '�. \ `� cq�,o vY� �et�W .f : Std4a- . �o��S__�� ' �-- �, v, 4 nN \ � �� 2 ., , � ��.� �, ;� ,,, � o �.��v,n Na c�.� . ��,��c� c ��-\`+�'�C�9y�;``f'2`v � � �,��printed on 50% recycled content more space on the back Lett COMMENT CARD Appl�2 EIR D9 Date Received The informafion you provide is a public record and will be shared J�I�� 20�� Name Y � � __.. Address � 2- ' S ' �rocessed by CUPERTINO City S� vs P � __ __ ' ,, r�� To view the�EIR �mal� please�isit Cupertino.orc�/ Commenf subject(s) AppleCampus2 I have the following comments about#he Apple Campus 2 Draft En�ironmental �mpact Report(DEIR): �,✓ i c` /r.E�✓ lJ S /� / �L-� G{,/i�C . -� „�'i !`it •$�„�� `o� `� ,,,. �� Gt c l� � Ce ,o r 1�' �(i dL .� /�.r liU�t iv� 1 'f V�^' !s� .� d� l�� U� —(JL _ d�_ ��~� �. ��9�"�b^��Gi S ,.,� r r 1 ^ -_-. _- ❑ E ■ :�printed on 50% recycled content more space on the back Lett D10 CQMMENT CARD The information you provrde is a public record and v�il!be shared. Name ` ;�--�_�'�___ I �� u� _�(iN� �ili�� 1 , r/� �� CUPERTINO Address l�j Gfl� �✓��— �j f/ City � v v Zip � _ To view the D�IFZ Emai{ �l� c, �.�,�� please visit l� �`� Cupertino.org/ Commen�subject(s)� AooleCampus2 I have the following comments about theApple Campus 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report(Q�IR): � � • cG� - �- � 1 � l_ �� — 1 5(.�2 �%�. �' � ��"� 1 c.v � �<�i�� ■ - v�c�v a.:�%� � _ 6. `, aV!-S �c�v►� �— � � � �,.�printed on 50% recycled contenf more space on the back Lett COMMENT CARD �p��IR o11 ��ReCeiyed The information you provrde is a pu�blic record and wi!!be shared. ��;��'� ;� Name '�M�.� Ja,,,r, e.r�. �;e.uU�� Atfdress o L.w p �,, {�. .y, _ CUPERTINO :�,;�,,:..; - Clty �q+�.�n Zlp Q�/.�;f To view the DEIR Email _1�!�Ha.� please visit Cupertino.orgl Comment subject(s) _. App�ecampus2 I have the following comments about the Apple Carnpus 2 Draft En�ironmental Impact Report(DEER): �L 'V1 ��th�1i�' h � � -t.. _ :uM�� _ a�- C_w�ocXt�.:on� i u.. 1� wn� c�. ,�. � r `�in� �`�-G e.�nv t�ro✓�vwww�eo�.1 im c,a,e� �c�w� �wQ�c'�a11 _av,:Q ar�c��r�c _ �v�eA+ws o.so.�r�— D.� �L.� Dr o-na.c� ws�v,a . �Se?u�,_ tal�P. � ■ � ■ 1 �C��S�o.Q�a.�� o e. + ❑�� ❑ �' � '��'1iS �v'ar�G. _►�� n•s� °�� (.+O p�11N11hV1 i r ' � 1� �V 2. �� Lt.tp�?�� ,��printed on 50% rec d content �~ more space on the back � Lett D12 COMMENT CARD The information you provide is a pu,blic record and will be shared. Name J '� Address�7 g �/ �� r`�. �� a� � � CUPERTINO City �-��,�� ,�.� �_1�. Zip 9��s U To�iew the DEIR please�isit Email ��S�.I_ C �� _�—��_� Cupertino.org/ Comment subject(s) ��o�.0 AppleCampus2 I have the follow[ng comments about fhe Apple Campus 2 Draft Environmental Impact R�porf(DEIR): --��'-'—r*=��`l-�-�-C t ��/� '� ti� (' i /l,�C}oL %1 �i'.�� __��!o,�� , .�1��_^� � 1 �� °�i�- .�� _ 1 �- c� .n ` o� .a.� ,� ...�. .l �_ _� — �� — ��E�R> ti Date Recefved ��., � �_.__--- JUN 2 6 �j� j 4 . Proc.�ssed`6�y _ � . ■ �,.�printed on 50% recycled content �' Lett App�e 2�IR �1.3 Date Retelved COMMENT CARD ._ �.� 2 6 �013 The information you provrde is a public record and will be shared. "� _____..--- Name ��-S� �S Q i 4'l aSO� �� . Address �b� ��.5��'G�C.� �I��._��-� p�Q{ .� CUPERTINO CIt�/ ��_�QS_� Zlp �'S f��_ _�__ Ta view the DEIR please�isit Email �_�5��1 23 � W� drtia.� a C G��__.� Cupertino.ora/ Comment subject(s) � goo�ecampus2 I have the following comments bout the Apple Campus 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report{DEIR); ��° �1�,c f�P��v� +n�f —�� `� - e� '� — -f� c.- � ' � 1 _ ��-� p�p -��- ;� C7 . . i,�� printed on 50% recycled content more space on the back Lett D14 COMMENT CARD �-- The informatron you provide is a public record and wil!be shared. '� ..._...__ Name�Q.��.��1� —__ ---- — . Address��6 Q��d,�A-1IQ� CUPERTINO Clty '�- " :� �` zlp ��u 7 To view the DEIR Email [��p��,�,_�_�-- please�isit �} Cupertino.org/ Comment subject{s) _— g�o�ecampus2 � l�ave the following cornments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft Environmenfal Im act Report{DEIR); -��2 c�) 1'�l S ot�i�c� --f-c� �.�i�'1�Q �� ,/Y�/�i27�� ' � $�- -_ I 1 � bar�`R�ty� _ - �� _ _��u�`Y�_Fnr� � . � � _ . ��-�.�' �,T _-- ❑ � . �" � . �,��printed on 50% �ecycled content more space on the back Lett D15 C�MMENT CARD The informafion you provrde is a pub/ic record and will be shared. Name Address CUPERTINO City Zip To view the DEIR �mail please visit Cuperti�o.orc�! Comment subject(s) AppleCampus2 I ha�vy�e the following comments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft En�ironmental Impact Repor�(DEIR): I"`►� �31P"?�f°.�•In�� "�Y'tn��~C � �°�� 1 V►'�'1e.�G�+nc'i a {W �C]��Q �� `��.�f;� Y�vr�� f.Jv4�-e �UY��a Cor�v�,��-2 lno�vs i1 U��eadU ��r��►�W_ rC�.. � �.�a _�►n v�o.ri-r i 5 ��, ( 11 t ,� � � __ 1 �ro�f�F�c b�►r KS v�A e ��. � � �n��c o��-2S �-�!�o.�-I- tr�.�fi� w> 11 b e. (� t�U cc��,��, �e�l,�T' . 0�' �� N o w ��II ��-k�s b� �l�- �.,�;�}�, �? .�_ , � . ❑, ■ . �:printed on 50% recycler�content more space on the back ■�r Lett D16 COMMENT CARD � �_� D 'ved The information you provrde is a pu�blic record and wil!be shared. ,�ll�' � � 2013 Name Address � CuPERTINO Clty _ 71f� - To view the DEIR Email please visit - Cupertina.orc�! Comment subject(s) � u� tk �,.�.,r�-.��--��-e� 1-e sti cCe.�,.:� (,�5� App4eCampus2 b��-�� a�n�� {�,i�v��- �z.., d� ��-��r'� cs. �, . c�_ ,� I have the f011owing comme�Yits about t�ie Apple Campus 2 Draft�nvironmen�al Impact Report{DE[R): � ��i af I�w-�--- ��w �'wvi 4�v+.e,,,.��t h �v. �.�,�as�h�4�s 6V BirV`i�� `1.LC��'J 1Y�(n ��+ YYti(J�1-0� r v c.d S UYJ-z�v-� .Y�Y �� rl b'2N �W �1�n,a.( 1v�C v�i L w') 19.�i�o+�v�-�-vr.re�w"�'� '�Y _� �6 5k>�v-�.�. �, G L Du l.vt�`�� 1 —o �- d� �wv�F- v 4' �v�,v.-�`�'� u1 a.A,d �v e ti..�..-e C.�U�.�.1 d1 C�e��o.,.�_ � c��6 (5� '�4`GV�.1,w�a� I'�U.'1 b-f.v w 4.i � 1 S �.. ' �� wi w�■w �'o�_._._rr�h\ u r.wti �n�� c.w5 CR N�-e,v . �1- �o� L ��ru� �t.e\'. •�a�' �ru..v.�,�r�c�l �e-e-�1 � � � . 1 � `' ��f.�a�v, U��e r� Ol 5 G� ��},1n � ��`e�-e;c 1.0 h�--t`wwa-a nw � �� °�t Z � ----- � �,.��orinfed on 50% recycled content more space on the back • Lett D17 COMMENT CARD The informatron you provide is a public record and wrll he shared. Name ` ��'' � Address �� CUPERTINO City ° � �-_ Zip��i 1'I�L To�iew the DEIF2 Emall � /� please visit ��-"��— � � � Cupertino.orc�! Comment subject(s) _ �� AppleCampus2 I have the followin camments about the Apple Campus 2 Draft nvironmenta! Impact Report(DEIR}: r a � Q�__ o.%. -- --- 1 - — — ❑■ �"� - - . _` . � __ ; __�- ❑ � J ■ . �.��printed on 50% recycfed conten# more space on the back Lett D18 COMMENT CARD __.. _. The�nformation you pravide is a public record and will be shared. '� __ ___ __. — Name��` Address � � l/� CUPERTINO C.ity �� _ Zip �� To�iew the DEIR Emaii �� -Cf � please�isit Cupertino.ora/ COmme�1�S�lbject( AppleCampus2 I°h�ve the fallowing comments aboufi the Apple Campus 2 araft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR): _ � �a.�, � � r��-r� . �t.r�c�� ok ��c! � f � ��, -- � 1 ti r� ,� r � f Apple 2 EIR. ��i� �� _ G ��.��r�� at� �-L i _ ,n�r_�-s- � � . ■ . �,��printed on 50% recycled content ��ore space on t�e back Lett D19 C�MMENT CARD - , � The rnformatian you pra�ide is a pu61lc record a�d wiJl be shared i �-a 'EVame --��-�:L_- .._�f:_ . Address� � �d2' '��l �. CUPERTIN� city S r�� '.L�c r�-- �r� � z�p _`�C� �-e�-- -- ro vE�inB o�i� Erri�il ��,�._i.1..�..��GGI - �P��.�_ pfeasevisit C u partino.arril COrr1CriBF�t 5ubject{8}_______ AppleCampus2 ! �ve the following commen#s ak�aut the Apple Campus 2 ❑raft Environmentaf Impa�f Repart[�EIRJ_ .�� -�s ��.-��r ��e r ��:�-��-�r� �s�r-�,�__ 1�� .� �s�� h�a� -r�e�� - .��7�� r� � �.. ��.�+�� I��v_.f�,��c.,��J_�I_e �� -t�us � �rd��7�-_ l—�'�}� :�❑ ��r� �� 7'� e r��t�r v�u�-:�r� I E�v.,scx..L vl l � ��tf��?�-��- ¢-° �r� .�_s�''r��u.u�e� 7, yav ,��us ■ �4�'` ■ 1 ,�i� 1'?i c�„_�u-��.E ,�'065.� l�c��s�_--��,�e�Uer ��o c—�-��a,�?s�,�5_ ti'��" . ��r'�'��'�'a� �of��2`�v�r��p�]-- --��IdU _ � ut� ��. . � -`] � ��-_1_�,� ` �n r�' �a,r��?�l�?ny�'S `t-o� C.� � � - r-- � r�ti . ��e I'�.r�v at:�r� c��`�� C.�-�-1�5 a.r��0'�.��I�.��i_G_ C� e�._�.�.v°S . �� ■ �, �printed on 50°Io recycled cvntent more space on t�e faack ■ Lett D20 �,ap�� !S °P�Gie_ 5 ±e� c o� � �ct; iF�` �5 �- ..�� r't��o �V��.��d �,e_. �'` _:_� °��_�—5�.1,�o� fi-�t�- _ � ��_ ,`�.z. �� l�-�- -P��-�( . 1 �--��. � � � Apple 2•EIR. ate it�ved JEIf� 2 5 2�13 reocessed hy. - --- www.c u pe rti no.orglAp p le Co m ments The City of Cuperfino welcomes your cornments about#he Draft Environmental lmpa�t Report�DEIR)for'the prapossd Apple Campus 2. Please be aware that all comments and inforrnation pra�ided through#his prpcess wili be�iewahle by the public, a�cessihle on our website and part af the puhli�record. Comment cards may he turned in at the Cupertino Senior Center, Quinlan Cornmunity Center and City Hali. From:Shankar T[mailka:sankartC�yahoa.tom] 5ent:Wednesday,3uiy 17, Z013 3:05 AM Lett Tp: Ciry Coun[il 5u�ject: 5uppart for App1e�ampus 2 E1 Folks. My�ddress is 3876 S�lclwin�ri4�e., Santa Cla�a.CA. With the prQmise of Apple�andsc�pin�develQpnient�nd plan, myself and my family is supportin�this proposal. �"lia�iks Kci�l�ar, S�tthya and Parths� -----Original Message----- From: Ri[k Rohleda [mailto;rick.robledo��mail .corn] Letf Sent: Wednesday, ]uly 17, 2013 7:13 RM E2 �o: City Council Suhject: Apple campu5 i'm in suppvrt for the new apple campus. I �elie�e zt wili bri.ng new ❑ppvrtunity for many , in addition ta re�enue to the �ity of cupertino. Yes g❑ forward in making the city of Cupertino a landmark. From:stanley lee[maiito:iees[aniev8&r;Ychoo_earn] Sent:Wednesday,]uty 17,2013 5;Q8 PM Leff To:City Cvundl Subl�:Apple Campus� E3 Dear City Counci[s, I strnngly �tippc�rt p:�etient ver5sizn nt� tf�e A��rl� Campi�5 ?. I �irn a Cupe3-tinn ReSid�n� and tiie awner at� tlie�orner huildin� . 1698 S. Wnlfe Rd. 5unny�ale, CA. 1[�cated �[Elie corner n1�H�ametiteacl a�td S. W{�lt�e Rcl, [�irectly ac:�os5 fi'n�T�A�ple Ca�n�uti ?. lhanks Sr�inley Lee D.D.S. 71]7113 P�hox ?��9 Cupertinn. CA. 95Ul4 - .;,-- ;� ,.. � . -- Fram: W:�yne Lee [mailta:waynejlee@ma�.com� �ett 5ent: Tuesday, 7u1y 16, :_�'1� :�.::: ? i!', To: City Council E4 5ubject: Apple Campus 2 A5 a current dnd pr�ud r•:: .;... �_ ..- �.i:;�:i i i� :� :.�� _.. ;,�,,; : _. •:u;: �:�; . l'�.. , �: ':� �.::i.i•:. � ..� ti •. Apple Campus 2. Apple si�s tleariy put [uper'L'in� ❑n the rnap ar�und the w�rlr�. Last year I eampleted the Grand 5lam of tennis (U5 apen, French Open, Wimbledan and Australian Open] as a spectator o�er a 5 year period. I ne�er expected to see sa many of the yvung generativn walking arvund prvudky flashing their iPhane and mare re[ently iPad. And suprisingly same of them knew where Cupertino was betause ❑f Apple. It would be a shame if Apple wauld e�er lea�e Cupertin❑ and the 5tate ❑f California. Apple belongs in Siliton Valley and the city of Cupertino. The financial impact going fvrward can ❑nly be a majar plus for the city. Wayne Lee Lett E5 -----f]rigina� �-�;=:�_ ,;.�,:. - -- Fram: Reilly vinc� �mailta:vreilly331d{�yahoo.comj 5ent: Tuesday, ]Uly 16, Z913 7:44 PM To: City Caun�il Suk�ject: aple I am a resident of Cupertin❑ for the past 22 years and ha�e followed the histary ❑f ❑ur city [lose. I think that Apple plans fvr building in our city is �ery good fnr all of us. � wou�d like ta see more informatian on haw they plan to handle traffic. It seems to he the number one topic. from:Adolfas Melinauskas [�na+lto;adalfas�9}vahoo.com] Lett Sent: Monday,July 1S, 2�13 3:41 PM E6 To:City Cauncil 5ubject: supporting App3e Campus We tatally suppvrt Apple Campus. It wi11 be a big re�enue producing prvjec�. Plus App1e wili employ many technical pevple which is good for Cupertina and ather cvmmun�ties. Let's keep the prajec� going fuZl speed ahead and not be influen�ed by negative neighbors. Victoria & A1 Melinauskas -----Orig€nal Message°---- Fram: Valerie Kiadeh [�1iailto:v�J,erie�k�r�hr��r�m] Lett 5ent: Monday,.7uly 15, 2013 6:07 PM Ta: City�ouncil E] 5ubje�t: Apple ❑e�r CqunCil Memhers Apple is nne of the I�est things happening in Cupertin[r right npw. Please support the[qnsCruction af Apple Campus 2. I Think it will bri�g va�ue ta our pr�perties and prestige to our�ommuniry. Hpping For smvpi�sailing, Valerie Kiadeh Cupertina resident -----original Message----- From: Rabert Adzi.ch [mdilCq_rahertad�iCh[a}{nC�.COm] Lett Sent: Mpnday, ]uly 98, Z913 3:38 PM 70: city cauncil ES C�: applecanjpus2fdapple.�orn 5ubje�t: Apple Campus 2 As a lifetime resident of Cupertino, T would like to formally express my utmost suppart far the new Apple �ampus. I strongly feel that the new �ampus design is not ❑nly aestheti�ally 6eautiful, but will be a landmark building far generations t❑ rame. I ran think af no other iconi� building propased Qr built in the last century that ri�als this new Apple huilding. Please praeeed with the appro�als as soon as poss�ble to get this fahu�a�s new eity landmark started as soon as possible. Thanfc yflu, Roqerrt Adzich 1616A Carmen Rd Cupertino, CA 95014 Lett -----Qriginal r�essage----- E9 From: Rohin Anderson [mailto=rr�hinolaCn�ine.�oin] 5ent; Monday, 3uly 08, 20i3 10:55 AM To: City Coun�il Suhject: Suppart for Apple Campus 2 I just want to share my ful}. support for Apple's Campus 2. I think it is great they ha�e taken great pain and effart in planning to build a green �ampus and remain in Cupertino. We, as a city, ha�e henefited greatly frvm their presen�e and will continue ta d❑ s❑ in tf�e future. Rohin Anderson -----�riginal Message----- From: Rebe[�a 5�happ [mailta:rmscha�7p[�Y��a4.COm] Lett 5ent: Thursday, ]uly 04, 2013 8:52 AM To: city Cauneil E1 0 Cc: Thomas 5chapp Subjert: Apple Campus 2 suppart dear Czty Cvuncil members, My husband and I reside in �he City of Cupertin❑ and we suppart the arri�al of the Apple Campus 2. We ha�e 1i�ed in the City far 33 years and raised �ur family here. Apple has always been an impartant part of our communzty. We are very ex[ited abaut the lands�aping, bicycle, pedestrian fa�ilities, and the parkland impra�ements whir�t Apple will be making. Our City needs mare of this especial�y as we mo�e towards a mare just and sustainable world in Lhe future. Apple has anci will make i#'s mark. It wiJ.l he govd f�r the City af Cupertino to jain fQrces and begin the de�elopment af it's newly planned City center at 5te�ens Creek 8oule�ard and Tanta� A�enue. i'hanks so mu�h fvr warking hard t❑ make aur City a better plaGe t❑ li�e and work, Sin�erely, Rebec�a and Thomas 5chapp From: Phyllis Pei[mailto:ppeErn@gmai�,com] Sent: Monday,July Ol, 20i3 9:06 PM Lett To: City Council 5ubject;Apple Campus 2 E11 I-ii, [ am a Sunnyr•ale resident li��in�directly acrass from Apple Campus ? ri�ht ❑ff af I-loc��estead. 1 welcoine Apple's presence,and feel tliat crsare bvsinesses ��ill t3iri�e �ecause of the jobs anci dollars Apple��i13 pimip into the lacal ecanosr�_y. [ �elie�•e A��ple has taken�are tn address the en�•ironmental issttes and ttie naysayers are just «astin�e�eryone's time. We can't huild a pericctly l"ail-safe, nn risk en�ironrn�ntal plan_ Yes, [ u�iderstand the tradeotfs af ecan�my �s risks, �nd Apple �ias addressed �oth ��itl� a balartced approach_ I ha�e li�•ed and ti4•orked in "dyis�g"towns�sid that I�ii47ht does iiot enlia��ce the en�ironme�it in a�iy way_ I hope tlie Cupertino Cntuicil rl7eml�ers will be ratianal enott�h to not p�inder to the extremists. Sir�cerely, Phyllis Pei, RN 1689 Meadowlark Lane 5unnyvale, CA 94�87 or�eirn{r��maiLcom Lett From:Dennis Hpulsby La�ltr�rdhauis�� n�a�l��r�m] E12 5ent:h'londay,]uly 41,�Q13 1I1:44 AM 70:City Coun�il 5ubjeet:Apple Campus 2 Dear Sir�Madam, We, the Houlsby Fam+ly, at 1��55 Mira Vista in Cu�ertin�, fully suppart the Apple 2 campus. It will be a great adriition ta our community and will be a state vf the art structure that we can be proud a�. I belie�e that Apple will 6e a gaod �ammunity �artner and will a�tively wark with t�e �ity ta mitigate any negative effects of th� in�reased traf�ic expected near the campus during rush hvur. Regards, Th� Houlsby's Lett From: sandra james [mailto:sandyljames@st�cgiflbal.net] 5ent: Monday,Juiy Q1, �013 1:09 PM E13 Ta: City CpunCil Su6ject: Apple 2 Campus I a��i dc�nitely iri favor af t11e !�pple Ca�1�}�us 2; pl�ase appro�•e without delay. Tf3e Uci��#�its ttiis important developinent w�12 bring ta Cupertino and the surro�indiii� area are enorr7ious. Sa�ldra I.. .lames Forr��er Mayor City of Cupertino Fram: pwschasker@comcast.net[mailto:pws�hasker@�flm�ast.net] Lett Sent: Monday,July Qi, 2013 1:24 PM To: City Coun�il E14 5ubject:Apple 2 Prajeet af Expansion As a lan� time resident and ho�neowr�er in Cupe�-tino, I heartily support the significant building plans and econon�i� grvwth that Apple stands ready to impleEne�lt. Cordially, Phil S�hasker Frpm: �aruwafla, Nina [maifta:fdina.�aruwalEaC�ChnorcaLc4m] Lett Sent:Thursday, ]une 27, 2013 10:��AM E15 7n: City Counci� Suhject:APPLE CAMP�15 2 SUPP�RTER Dear City Council Mem6ers, 1 am in suppart af the Apple Campus�,and available to work vn any task force required—Safety 1ssUes—Traffic Mitigation ideas-projects ete.to make sure its done with great thvughtfulness for the gavd pf the City of Cupertino! 7hank you, Nina Hina Daruwalia,Realtor, 1�105 S �e Anza Bl�d, Cupertino,CA 95014. Email:Nina.daruwatla�Gbnprcai.cam http::'vJwtiv-ninadaruwalla.com ftiIlp:;'www.camoves.�o rn!,i i n a.daruwa Ila ORE#0171�223 Digit�l Marketing 5pe�ialist A Public Safeiy Commissioner with The City of Cupertin❑ Lett E16 Qn W�[l,Jun ?�i.2I113�il 7;D[] FM, Katfty Matul�.wicr�i.�illzvm�ur.t�i�n�tin.��tint��r��te: We are iar�g time residents of Cupertino. We currently�ive 2 blocks fram Apple Campus 1 and have f�und Apple to be a good neighbor. We have reviewed the plans and reporCs cancerning the new campus and gi�e Apple aur wha�e hearted s�pport. Apple has consistently been a good neigh�or and is�on�erned a��ut the cammunity. Please vQte yes ta pass their plan. Matthew and Kathy Matulewicz 1�574 Orange�ree Lane Cupertino,CA 95014 ❑n Wed,Jun ?b.?013 at 7:D9 PM,J�yne Mam�i��nr.liamC��maiLr�}ni�wra�e: Lett City of Cupertino: E17 I a�rs a long time residenk and husiness owner in the City ❑f Cupertino [3S+ yearsJ. I am �ery excit�d with the prospett af the new App!e campus. I am certain that it wil! in�rease aur overaEl re�en�e base and impr-a�e our city o�eralf. It will definitely put us "�n the Map" and mo�e our city in the rigt�t directifln. i ha�e re�iewed Rp�le's project prflp�sal and feek that any negati�e impatts would be minimal. I hope you will support the success �f this prajeck far ❑ur city. Thank y�u far your consideration. Iayne Ham 11713 Dorathy Anne Way �upertino, CA 95014 �avn�Ham javne.ham(r��gmail.cnm Lett From:AgneS Smith [mailta:m��a4�3�iC�?�gm�iL�vm] E1g 5ent: Wednesday,]une 26, �013 9:49 PM Tn:City Cauncil 5ubject:Apple Campus Plea�e no[� thiti ihiti haci�hold ��ally 5uppn��r5 s:cm5t��u��iai1 of'tlze Appl�C'amputi. W� ��ill r�ad ll�e en��irnnmen�al re��r�rt a�fd plan t�tmm�3s;nt czn it ati a[sp:�c7ps�ial�. Thank Ynu Lett On W�d.Ju�t?G,?[113 zt[ 1 i:Sfl AM.cn��'h�'.tci��'c;��1��i�t.EUt�wro[c: E19 Dear councii mem3�ers, I support the Apple canstruction project as is withaut m�dification---Thank You---Michael Picchetti On Wc�l.lu�� ?fi.?U13 at 7:�f] PM. M�srilyn Wc»�llcr�i3x33�I�n��rrullcrC�f,��l.rc,�n��vrafc: Lett i wnuld lik4 la ex��reti5 my tiu��r� Cur ll�e ncw Ap�le can�puti. We�ire Inr�unate tn h�ive�i�ita.jnr c�3ipl«,ver hrin�in�.}nhs uncl atitiut�t[�c�ur Gc�i�irnunity, �nd I tie� �yi�thir.�l�ut hei3efi� i��r Cur��7ina. E20 Regards, Marilyn Wcndler ?[]1 13 I�nrthcrCtil 5quare Cuputinn From: ]im Remedias [mailto:jremedias@gmail.com] 5ent: Wednesday, ]une 19, 2613 9:54 AM Lett Tn:CiLy Coun�ii 5ub;ect: 5uppart for Apple Campus� E21 Dear City Cp�uzcil, Nly name is Jim Remedios�nd 3 har�e 6een a residesit af the C'upertino sii��e 1948 ai3d I7aG�e �fr�wn up on the Peninsi�la and in the 5ilicou Valley. This e-mail is to let you�i kno� of it,y sup�nrt f�r the Apple C'ampus ?. i feel that it 4vi11 Ue essei3lial to keep the ecnn.��y ra6ust of not oi�ly C'upe��ii�o,l�trt of'tlye 5ilicon Valley as a wl3ole. Pleas�allo�r• Apple Coi�i��uter tn mor•e forw�rd w'stlz its plaizs to de�elop the Apple C'anipus Z site. f �varked for Hewlett-Packard at that site for al�nost 1&r,rears. !t is a terri�ic loca[inn. I ivas r•er��disa�pointed �vhen [ tirst Iieard a6out HP lzavi:i�. tl7at site. 1 ain ��ateful ta Ste��e ]obs and Asaple €�or��aiitii�� tn saG•e tltat site and »ot onl�r kee��, l3i�t also �ro��•}n��s in Cupertinn. Please let th�m do s�}. We will all iaenes"st. YoL�rs �erv tnilv, ]im Rei�tiedias ir�.��cii�.;�{{", ' -n� -----Qriginal �lessage----- Lett From: Ken Huang [rnailto:yavo kokenC��yai�oa.con�] E22 Sent: �londay, ]une 17, �fl13 }�D,47 PN� To� City Coun�il Subject: Forrr�al support for Apple Campus� Hi, We are one aF the mar�y Families oF Cupertinp who iove this ciry for everytliing it has tp offer. We are here to shaw our 2p0°Io s�RRort��r A�ple Campus 2. lhis wiil be good combination with the fNain Street proj��t to take this ciry to a whole new level. Please appra�e tnis project, Ken Huang Frarn: Kathy Matulewi�z[kathymata[�msn.com] Lett 5ent: 5aturday.June 15,2013 fi:30 PM Tv: applecampus2 E23 Subject: Appraval of Apple Campus 2 We are long term residents af Cupertino and li�e on Orange Tree Lane,about a 5 minute walk to Apple Campus 1. Apple has been a good neighbor. We have reviewed the plans for Apple Campus 2 and fully support the plans they have submitted a�d request your appro�al. NEatthew and Kathy fViatulewicz Lett From: Elisd Hi�key [maiEto:mrshi�kev��aaple.�orri] 5ent:Thursday,)une 13, Z0�3 9:39 AM E24 TD: City CovnCil Subject: Re: Apple CampuS 2 Re�isterin� tiup�c3rt for APnle Ca�n�?us? From: Arr�ao Guotr Leff Ta: aflo�e�a m ous= Suhject: Apple Campus z E25 ❑ate: Monday,]une 17,2a13 7:�3:58 PM We are fartunate to have Apple cansider building a mega compkex in Cupertino. Please make whate�er concession they need ta make this happen. A�ple is a great company. Let us not drag them into lengthy discussia+�s an seemingly minor issues., but welcame the averall �enefits they bring tathis area and heip make Apple Campus2 happen in a timeiy manner. Amar Gupta -----Qriginal Message----- Letf From: ❑ehbie Berganta [mailta�dber�antz��mail.com; E2 6 Sent: Thursday, 7une 3.3, 2013 9:31 PM �o: City Council 5ubject: Apple Campus d �ear Ci#y Cvun[i1 Memhers, I have heen a Cupertina resident far the past 20 years. I wauld like to give my full support far the new Apple Campus 2. I believe this new huilding wi11 add new jobs and more tax base for Cupertino. Thank yau and again I hope you �ote in fauar of the new Apple Campus. Sinterely, �ebhie 6ergant� From:]ason Tsai [m�iltn�en�tsainmsr�.com] Lett 5ent:TuesdBy, June 11, 2�13 7:55 PM Tv: City Caun�il E27 Su6ject: Appie Campus� Qear City Council Members, My wife and I wauld like to fupy suppart Apple Campus 2 construction in Cupertin4, Apple is a great company that we can praudly say tfl friends and families. We are prvud to live in this�ity for more than 1fl years. The canstru�tian and new fa�s inside the new ring builtfing wil'praW'tde plenty of opportuniti�s for future growth. Th�se jo�s are highiy ski�led workers with advanced degrees. 7his new opportunity will help t�re business inside Vailco Mal�and its surrounding area. As part of the proposed plan,the new Campus wiil have lots of apen space and trees surrau�ding the ring structure. I€'s go+ng ta�e a beautifu!campus. We urge you ta be suppartive af this great apportunity. 5incerely, Jasan Tsai&Mei-Li Kao 7fi36 Elderwflod Ct Cupertina,CA 95�14 Lett -----Original Message----- E28 From: Setty Howard Mai� [nia3lto:bettvhoward��vaf�oo.�oin] 5ent: 5aturday, ]une 08, 2613 2@:47 AM 7a: City Council S�bject: Apple2 I �an't imagine anypne heing against the campus, look at al1 the revenue and jvhs it wi�1 hring to the city of Cupertino. Lett E29 From:Carlos McEvilly [mailto:�arlos.mcev�llv@qmaii.com] Sent: Friday,7une D7, 2D13 10:1�PM Tu:Ciry Coun[il Subject: 5uppart the Apple Campus Z project H i, Please add n�e to yviir list of supporters ot tl�e Apple Cainpus?prn.je�k. As a Ci�pertino hoineowner and parent 1 am g3ad E€�at we hare sucl� a�reat company in our msdst doing wQnders far the wQr[d ar�d fur aur lo�al econant�. Car�os McEvilky Lett E30 From: hih�c ez]a��L Dmcast,net[maii[a;t�igez7Ci�amcast.net� 5ent:Thursday,]une 06, 2013 1:47 PM To:City Coun�il 5ubject:APPLE CAMPUS 2 I STRQNGLY SUPP�RT APRLE IN THEIR PLAN TQ BUILd APPLE 2 IN CUPERTINQ. APP�E HAS 6EEN A RESPONSI6LE N�IGHBOR UP T� NOW AND I 5�E N❑ R�AS�IV �HAT THEY SHQULD N�T C�NTINU�TQ ❑Q SQ IN THE FUTURE. IN ADDITf�N, TH�Y WILL AaD 'M�LLI�NS TD THE CITY'S TREASLIRY AND M�RE THRN MAKE UP FQR TH� LQSS �F HP. Lett E31 From: Edwin Kang[nzailto:edw+n kang��liotmail.com] 5ent:Thursday,June Q6, 2a13 7:35 PM To: City Coun[il 5ubjact: Please su�port Apple Campus 2 Dear Cupertino City Coun�il, i am a Cupertino�ity resident @ Arata Way.I am writing to�arge you to pass the Apple Campus 2 project plan.7his project will inerease Cupertino praperty values as a wt�ole,increase city re�enue and increase employment oppartunities. It is good for small businesses,hame owners and eity af Cupertino a win-win for surrounding �ommunities and Apple! Thanks, Edwin Lett E32 -----6riginal Message----- Frvm: hetsyeskeldsan[�grnail.�om [mailta;hetsyeske_ldson�la�mail_.com] Sent: Thursday, 7u�e 05, 2813 ie:i� PiN Ta: Cfty Counril 5uhjert: Apple Campus 2 I would �ike t❑ express my appro�ai of the proposed �ampus that Apple has planned in Cupertinfl. I feel �ery prvud to have Apple remain in Cupertino with su�h a magnifirent b�ilding. � hope you will be appraving this addition ta our city. 8etty Eskeldsan 23560 Crista Rey Qr.,2I1C Cupertino, CA 95014 Lett From:fan jiao [±nailto:�iaofan�� ma�l,�om] E33 Sent:Thursday,3une�fi,z�13 1:09 PM To: City Council Suhject: 5uppart Apple Campus 2 Dear City Ct7url�il. Ati a CuPc��in��rc�i�lc�it��F 3 I yGan. 1 tii�prnr� AP�Ie CamPz�ti? f��r itti CnG�i��nn�Cnl�llly ticaiis�ci cls:tii�it,an�� F1�7��1� �nc�tin�iii��t�cosilrihule the city in �ersz�s ol'en�#�laymeci��11iCI f�\`.{�+,�i. Fan Ji�it� 21�43$ Kr�i�h Pl��ce CU�7L'i'L}170�JS{)]� Lett E34 From: qdsrierk�n��omcast.neC{mailto: Fish�rk u romrast.net] Sent: Monday,June 17, 2a13 1:45 PM To:City Cvun�fl Cc: ��am�vs2ya�� le.�am Subject: Apple�Campus I have Eived in the Cupertino. 5unnyva�e area over 3� years. I hear there may he some�oncerns on whether#he City Cauncil should a�prove the Apple 2 p�oject. �ften times at various times of the day, in the area of existing Apple Cupertirsa facilities, I have r�at experienced any unacceptahle traffic canditians. Apples emplayee �using program naw and cammitted far App1e 2's future will cantinue to keep individual cars off Cupertino streets. Apple has cantinued to keep me and t supp�s�, other Cup�rtino residents with their plans far th�Apple 2 com�lex. I�etails f�r supparting the i�ca!economy with jabs, supporting �QCaI businesses, supporting lo�al gavernments and neighborhaods services as well as suppartir�g the local �ommunity such as I have ne�er seen provided hy any businesses in the past. Na doubt that Apple has aFsa pro�ided �omplete commitments far the above ta the City Council. J�bs for thase who huild the new cgmplex, re�en�e far laca! he�sinesses wha serve Apple and it's emplayees and praperty taxes aione are�a#id reasons#o supp�rt wf�at in my opinian wiil k�ecame the highlight point far Cupertina. The image that ane af the warids t�p cQrparations has it's headquarters lacated in Cupertina wilP surely in�ite other compan�es to cansider Cupertina as well. Fo�the ahove, I hape the Cupertina City Caun�il wili strangly support aRd ga aY�eacf with the Appie 2 project. There by answerir�g the question, "how can we N�T support the approval"? Eari G. 5i�arkey 2fl8�a Hamestead Rd. Apt 14A �upertino, CA 95414 errtail: qiasharks�coir�cast.net Lett E35 LetterlD 5D0315 Name Matthew Barr Address 9 D7 Lisa ar City,State Zip Brandenburg,KY 4D108 Email 15barr@insighthh.cam Subject Apple Campus 2 Praject Comment HeElo, I am in full suppvrt if this project,it will allow so many jobs ta be opened up.Apple wiEl �e abie to grow and prosper with khis new facility therefore,getting the�ity of Cupertino e�en mvre tourism.This facility is very wery energy efficient and truly beautiful in design.Like everything else apple creates. It wil]he a shining beacon for all state vf the art te�hnv€ogi�al facitlitias. I urge you to go lorward in this proje�t and allow apple to�uild this heautiful faci lity. Lett E36 Letterl0 5D4109 Name Valerie Szymanski Address 30921 Lucky Oak 5t City,5tate 2ip Cupertino,CA 95034 Email vjszymanski@gmail.com 5uhject fVew AppEe Campus Environmental Imact Repart Comment I support Apple's plan to remo�e raze existing�uildings to mo�e forward with their plan for the new Apple campus.This building praje�t will hring additianal jobs and re�enue ta Cupertina. Letter IO 500099 Lett Name Robert Adzich E37 Address 1�1 fi4 Carmen Rd City,5tate Zip Cuperiinv,CA Cuperfino Ema II rof�ert@adzi�h.�om 5ubject Apple 2 Campus Comment As a lifetime resident of Cupertino,1 wauld like[o#ormally express my utmost sup�ort for the new Apple campus. I strongly ieel thai ths new campus design is not only aestheticaily beautiful,but will be a landmark�uilding fvr generatians to�ome. I can think of no other icvnic building proposed or built in the last century that ri�als this new Apple huilding. Please proceed with the a�prvvals as svvn as possible to get this fabulous new city landmark sfarted as soan as possibEe. Thank you, Robert Adzich 1 ff1 fi4 Carmen Rd Cupertino,CA 95�14 Lett Name Rekha Puthalath E38 Address City,5tate Zip Cupertino, CA 95�14 Email rputhalath@hvtmail.�am 5ubject 5upport fqr Apple Campus 2 Comment I would like to give my whole hearted suppQrt for the Apple campus 2 as it means the ad�ent of a hetter e�anomy IQCally and otherwise; new job creatior�s-not;usf the technical fields�which Cupertino can provide amplyJ,but many others in�luding the�ity of Cupertino; putting Cupertino on the map as"A happening City";an�as an example for hausing an En�ironmenf friendly yet futuristi�Carr�pus of a Visionary Company. I am sure that a partnership between a greaY city and company will beneft both,and the wvrld! Letter ID 50Qfl88 Lett IVame 5amuel Ashknaz E39 Address 19652 Ste�ens Creek Bl�d City,State Zip Cupertino,CA 95Q14 Email sam�dadccupertino.cpm 5u6Ject Apple Campus F Comment Apple Campus[wo is the best thing will ever happen for Cuppertino. It will�reate lots ofjobs,and will be good far lo�al bussines. LetterlQ 500D86 Lett Name Jeifrey WurEz E40 Address i 135�erbyshire Dr City,StaFe Zip Cupertino,CA 95ff14 Email jdwurtz@aaf.com 5uhje�t Cvmments an Apple Campus 2 Comment I've lived in Cupertino far 38 years and think iYs a great cvmmunity. I wholeheartedly support fhe new Apple Campus P as a wel�ome addition to the city. Et will provide many new johs for the area,and it will increase the tax reven�es for the city. LetterlD 50�682 Lett Name Ali�e Jar.vb E41 Address 1095 Queen Anne�r Cfty,State Zip San Jose,CA 95129 Email elizabath70@hotmail.com Subject I support the constru�tion af a new Apple�ampus Cnmment I wauld�ike the new Apple�ampus to be a landmark and a magnet for job creation not ❑nly for Cupertino, but far the greater 8ay Rrea as well. I hope that our current�rop of graduates can[and jobs as a resuft of Apple's expansion and small businesses around the city will benefit from its construction.The campus will alsa be a�aon to both city and state tax re�enuas,and wilf be instrurrEental in keeping them stable. I hape the city council will appro�e the cvnstructian vf t�e campus sv it can become a foeacon fvr inno�ation and and a magnet for creati�ity in the 5ilicon Valley. Letter Ib 500079 Name neil struthers Letf Address 21ff2 almaden rd E42 Clty,5tate Zlp 5an Jose,CA 95125 Emafl neil@schtc.org Su6ject appie project Comment my famiiy supporis this praject...this is an unprecedented investment in our coinmunity {in the Billions}.the johs that this project will�reate for the�onsiru�tian industry is what will put thousands of construction workers ba�k to work after the warst e�anamic cycle t�e canstrucFion industry has e�er seen. LetterlD 500047 Letf Name Ramchander Gopalswamy E43 Address 9�2 5eptem�er i7r City,State Zip Cupertino, CA Cupertino Email ram.gapalD�D1�,7a gmail.com 5ubject Apple Campus 2 aEIR Comment Dear Council Members, As residents of Cupertino,we are hanvred tv have amvng st us the great wor[d famvus innovati�e company called"Apple". I would like to register my support far the new upcoming Apple Campus 2 gi�en its importance to our city&the surrounding cities from both an innavativn and e�onomic develapment perspective. Regards, Rarn�opal Letterf❑ 500041 Name []esimir Radisic Lett Address 10673 Cu4bertson Or E44 City,5tate 2ip Cupertina,CA Cupertina Email deskv08 c�gmail.�om Subject Apple Campus#2 Comment Dear SidMadame,as a long resident of the City of Cupertino!am�ery pleased ta ha�e an opportunity to express my opinion about such reputable company as Apple Computer is. I sincerely think the City shou3d da everything in their pawer to make Apple feel at home�y providing guidan�e with minimum disturbance.I am very sure,shvuld our neighhoring�ities such as Mt.View{hvme of Gavgle},City of Sunnyvale{Lv�kheed Martin and many mare] or City of Palo Alta{home af HP}had the same opportunity they would gfadly offer suhsfantial assistance ta reduce bureaucracy ta a minimum. The Appie Campus#2 wil[give aur Gity new value. It will pla�e The City of Cupertino with other outstanding places an Earth.The City of Cupertinv will ha�e one vf the mast remarkable mastarpiece of architectural creativity that our children will enjoy for generation ta coma. �ur�ote is:YE5,speed it up as much as you can. ane of the 5panish prover#�says: "Three ihings ne�er return". 'f.spent arrow;2.SppKen wprd 3.Lvs#apportunity.The appartunity is here.�on't procrastinate. Thank you.5in�erely yours,Family D. Radisic,{errtail.des�CO08@gmail.�om] Letterl❑ 5fl6027 Lett Name Jack Kang E45 Address 187$D Arata Way City,State Z�p Cupertino,CA 95014 Email Subject Appfe Campus 2 Comment Dear Cupertino City Coun�il, I am a resident of Cupertina city. I am writing to urge yau to pass the App1e Campus 2 project plan.This proje�t will increase Cupertina propeRy values as a whQle,increase city revenue and increase employment apportunities. It is gvod for small husinesses,home awners and�ity vf Cupertina! Thanics, Jack Le�eri❑ 540028 Letf Name [�ebbie.1en E46 Address 18760 Arata Way City,State 2ip Cupertino,CA 95D'i4 Email jen.deh�ie@gmail.com Subject Apple Campus 2-Please support Comment Dear Cupertina City Council, I am a resident of Cupertina city. I am writing to urge you to pass the Apple Campus 2 project plan.This proje�#will increase Cupertino property�alues as a whole,in�rease city re�enue and increase employment opportunities. !t is good for small businesses,hame owners and city of Cupertino a win-win for surrounding communities and Apple! Thanks, Deb6ie Ffnm:�Isantecfd �nailto_o�sontedd �� Lett Y[__ k�aol.com] 5ent: Manday,3uiy�2,�a13 li:3fi AM E47 To:City Countil 5ubject: I l�a�c been a retiideri�a�xl linrne R��ncr in Cuper�inn tiii►�� 147[]aiatl 3ia�c h�esi an Ap�1e �i�cr a�work ancl hc�n�c. [ f��II!, tiupport the ne�v I'acility i'ar what i�can brinv.to ihe ri�y, Than� vou. C. ❑I�nn FrQm: �lelen White[mailto_helenwhile4�gF(a7gmaiL�orn] Lett Sent: Monday,]uly 22, 2013 1p:35 AM E48 To: City Counril Suhject: Apple Campus 11 I am in fa�ror af Cuperiina accepting ihe pians for the Apple II. -----Dri.ginal Message----- Frflm: gorska[u7�orska.com E i�iai 1to:Qorska!�porsF:a.�am] Leff Sent: Monday, �uly 22, Z0�3 10:�Z AM 70: City Coun�il E49 5uhjert: I suppart Apple Campus 2! i suppor# Apple Campus 2! Sincerely, Caryl Gorska 10103 5enate Way Cupertin�, CA 95614 Lett Frorn:VenB Tdml]ellini [mailto:�en�.tambellini d�yaE�ao,c�rn] E50 5ent: 5aturday, ]uly�4, �013 8:47 AM To:City Cpuncii 5ubje�t: I 5upp�rt thE N�w Appl2�drrlpu5 �ear City Council, I tatally suppart the new Apple �ampus! It is a beautifulky designed building and Apple has always �een a valued�ampany and neighbar ta Cup�rtino. Best Regards, Vena Tarnt�ellini vei�a.ta,��bellini@yahoa.�oi�� From: inqbudqe�+aol.com [mailto:�nc�hudqeC�aol_com] Lett Sent: Friday, ]uly 19, 2013 9:3fi ANi To; City Council E51 Su6ject: Apple I support Apple fQ expancf in�upertino. 6udg� Ing 801 Septemher Drive Cupertino From: Yogesh Peticar[mailto:petkary a;yahoc,.r.u� Sent:Wednesday,]uly 17, Z013 1:39 PM Lett Tq: City CaunCil Subjeet:5uppart f�r Apple Campus Z E52 Hello Ciipeniric�City Cauncil Men�bers. I a�r a residetit of Cuperti�to tiry tar past 3 Years ai�d 1 supE�ort,4�ple Campi�s?. Fu1law�iig are i�1y det�ils 1'ogesi� Petkar 1 Dti3� Min�Ct. ��ipe��in0.CA 97Q1�} Hope.4p�zle ean t�reak�;r�,und nt'tl�eir n�w r.air�pi�s svo3i. Thanks Y'c��i -----Original I�lessage----- Fram; 7ane Tso [mailtn:kkjt�o��,cr�m] Lett Sent: Monday,]uly �S, 2�13 8:Q2 PM E53 Tv: City Council Suhject: SupporC Appie Campus 2 pr�ject flur farr�}iy suppart Apple campus 2 praject to be build in Cupertina. We live in 19g42 Portal Plaza, Cupertin�. ]ane 7so Lett From: Rqbert Hvose [n�aifto`hoose?2natt.nzt] E54 Sent: Monday,]uly 15, �013 3:23 PM to: Ciry Caun�il 5ul�ject: apple 2 this cain�us iti a��ond fhin� i«r cupertinn. Frvm: Alan Tan [n�ailto;al�n.�.�tan�n�naail.co�i] 5ent: Monday, ]uly 15, Z013 2:18 PM Lett Tv: City Council 5ubject: suppnrt App}e campus 2 E55 To whc�m it may�o�tcern; This email is t�»e��ister my perti«nal tiu��nrt fnr A�l�le Cam��i�ti 2 �roject. Alan Tan From:Tomas Lampo [mailta:tlampo�ap�le_carrF] Lett 5ent: Monday,July 15, 20I3 1:52 PM Ta: City C�uncil E56 5ubje�t: 5upport for Apple Campus 2 Hel lo, I li�e in Cup�rtinn, and wnuld like [o f'ai�nally re�isler n�y suppnri f�nr Apple Camputi?. Please let u1e knaw if'I neeci to pra�ide ar�diliun��l inCni7nalian. W i.�lTtl I'L'aill'C�ti. Tomas Lampa tlampo�ap�le.com Fram: 5teve Leu [n�ailto:amcoca�`a_�sbc2lobai.n�� Sent: T�ursday, ]u1y 11, 2013 9:39 PM Lett Tp: City Caun�lf 5ubject: App�e Compus z E57 To City Council. My famiiy supports the�anstructian of Apple Gampus 2 in Cupertino, and hppe it wifl start constructian ASAP. Thanks. 5teve Leu 3 9991 Merritt Qr. Cupertina,CA 95D14 -----original Message----- Lett From: Sara graftvn [rnailto.sara.�ra�Ftan[��mail.com] 5ent: Thursday, ]uly 11, Z013 7:@0 PM E58 To: [ity Cauneil 5ubje�t: Apple 2 Campus Hello, I am emailing t❑ share my support of the Apple 2 campus. eest Regards, 5ara Grafton Cupertin❑ resident Fram: ninadarlworks[}gmail.com f mailto_ninadartwarks�a�c mail_co�n]�n Behalf af Suxanne Dabadghav Sent:Thursday,7uly I1, 2013 $:40 AM Lett To:Ciry Caunci� E59 $upjec#: supporting the pr�ject. Tn Wh��r it May Contcnt. My hutihund anr! I bnth ar� in tiuppnrt ni�the Ap�l� Camputi?�u�d �c�nk tarward tn prn4ress uE�c�al�ti. Suranne an�] Ninad�ahadvha� Cupe��tina Residenls Swxnnne ❑abadghav sdabadqha�C�gmail�corrti From: 5teven eampbell `mailto:cam�pe777t�amail.cQm] 5ent: Wednesday,]uiy iQ, Z413 12:5� PM Lett Ta: Ciry Coun�il E60 5uhject: Appl�Campus� I ait� in full su�pon af�ampus ?. I supp��t them 6ein� isi Ciiperts�ia. Fram:5tefan Bengtssan [mailtQ:stefanL�-�naFets.nu] Lett 5ent: Wednesday,]uly ��, 2D13 11:3q AM ta: City Cauntil E61 Subjec#: Apple CampuS� Hi, Vae're rentin�;a ho�ise o;i 6set A��enue since a few years, in close pra�imity to witere tli�new Apple campus is pl�tnned. We are �ery muCh suppartssi�tlie new c�mpus and hape tn�et Ap��e�+s nei�h6ors svan! gest re�ards. 15tefan� Lett _ .... .�ir•�;;��.�.� ,.._�°,�i;;�- - rr•om: 5te�e Hi�l<5 [mailto:shicks�ine{o]aol.com� E62 5ent: Wednesday, ]uly 1e�, '�:a�_' =�._ . :;i•i To: City Coun�il Subje�t: Apple Ca:nF:�� Dear Cpunri]., I suppvrt the new A�ple complex. It needs to get dqne. Hvw could yvu nat suppart it and ha�e it go someplace else! StEVECI H1CIS5 10933 Canyon Vfsta Or. Cupertino, Ca G50�.4 From: 5heela Sreekanth f��lta:sheela[❑s�mail.com] Sent: Wednes�ay,]uly i0, Z013 10:53 AM Lett To: City Council Suhjeet: 5up�ort Apple Campus 2 E63 Formally registeri�z�my support far App1e Can�piis 2. Tha�iks c�C Re�ards, Shee4a Sreekanth. ��*��**��*��*�*�� -----�rig�nal Message----- Lett From: rooshabh �araiya [rn_azlto:�araiya��comcast.r,et] E64 Sent: Monday, ]uly 08, 2013 4:5� PM 70: City Council 5ubject: Apple �ampu5 I support the App�e �ampus project in Cupertino; it is the same site where � began my �areer with HP 4@ years ago; it would be great �For Apple and Cupertin❑ residents and businesses. You can reach me at 498-219-z513 [�ell ar emai.l). ThanxlRooshahh Varaiya -----�riginal Message----- Lett From: rvger�arl.{a�att.net [mailta'ra�er�arltalatt.net] Sent: Monday, ]uly 08, 2�13 I0:49 AIN E65 To: City Counril Subje�t: Apple new campus App].e new campus My name is Rager Carl I am S8 years ald z ha�e lived in Cupertina far 53 years and ha�e always thought of Apple as a great and �oyal neighhor! I support all they are doing and the matter in which they are doing it! Apple is the best thi.ng e�er to happen to MY tawn �7 Lett E66 -----Driginal Message----- Frqm: Nlary [mailto'mary!��asnpolepublish:in�_�=oiti] Sent: Thtsrsday, ]uly 0Q, 2013 11:22 AM to: City Cnun�il 5ubject: Re:Apple project I as a Cupertir�o resident and homeowner support the uproming Apple huildfng project.INary F.Hawkes,R.D.H. From: Muk�sh Gdrg [mailt�:th2garg5@gmdil.[pm] 5ent: ��esday,July 42, 2�13 1:35 PM Lett Tn: City Cqun[il cc: Mukesh Garg E67 5ukrject:AppEe Campus 2 Hi. I am Ci�pertin❑ resident and � ho�ne owner. 1 recei�tly re��ie«�ed �1��ple Campi�s 2 pian. 1 t9�ink tl3is is��er_y gon�l f'or Ct�perti:io Ciry a�td its reside3�ts i�� ai! respect. We shntild appro��e tl�is, Thanks, --mukesl� Mukesh Garg � h� ar a r mai�.com —-- -o� i�i n<;1 �,e,�==�,�- ---- Lett From: �oyangtien [mailto:povan�tien�vahoo.�Qm'. E68 5ent: 7uesday, �uly 0Z, z013 �?:�� '�� To: City Coun�il 5ubjeCt: 5upp�rt apple 2 �ampu<: Pledse regi5t2r me aS a Supporter 1=or apple � �anipus proje�t in Cupertino. I am a residen�e in Cupertino, address is �0550 Blossom Lane, Cupertino. Thanlcs! Paul -----�riginal Mes�,.:,f:,�: - --- Fram: Raaj Prasa� [mailto:raaip5(ulyahoo.�omj Lett Sent: Tuesday, ]uly P:?, YE;�, _�:`;;� �; E69 Tv: City Cauneil 5ubject: Apple Campus � I am a Cupertino resi u�:�� ..:r:�i �.��.;;.��::�� t. ... ._ -,��.�1� C..:��.,u�: .^ �� j�.��:.i . Thanks. Lett E70 Frnm: richard w#�ittington [mailto:rwhitt6313@att.net] Sent: Mortday, ]uly 41, ZOI3 2:44 PM Tv: City Co�an[il Su6ject: Apple Campus 2 Just to register my name, Ri�hard Whittingtan �Cupertino Citizen} as a supporter€or this passible up-coming praject. � � Thank you, Richard ❑. Whittington -----Original Message----- Frnm: pcheng45b7@yahoo.�om [«f�iftQ��cli�na45G7Co�y�hoo.co�ri} Lett 5ent- Mon�ay,July O1, 2�13 �:25 PM E71 Ta: City Council 5uhject: Support Appie Campus� I strongly support Apple Campus Z C�nstruCti�n in Cupertino. Phifip Cheng 7554 peach hloom drive Cupertino, Ca95Q14 From: Rajiv Marwah [mailto:raii��iarwahC�yahoo.com� Sent: Monday,]uly�1, ��13 14:15 AM Lett To: Ciry Council E72 Subje�t: we suppart the new Apple campus Raji�Marwah 10744�eep Clifte Dr Cu pertino CA 95014 From: Naeem ZaFar fmailto:naeem�i�itzermobile.com] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:1$AM Lett Tn: �iry Coun�il 5ubject: apple eam�us E73 Pfease aceelerate the DK#or this beautiful proje�t�it will support our city and is good for Cupertino Nz 18416 Chelmsfard drive Cupertino CA ..................................,............,.,...........,........................................................... Naeem 2aFar� President&CEQ J A08-218-192Q� naeem@hitzerma�ile.�or�i �TwiFter @naeem � skype nz2{120� www.SitterMobiVe.cam Lett -----nriginal r�essage----- E74 FrOm: Mdry R�i11y [mailta:maryreillyl(aiine.com] 5ent: Friday, 7une 28, aei� za:ii AM To: City Council 5ubje�t: I support Apple Campus 2 I'm a Cupertino resident and I support Apple Campus 2. Please allow construction to start soon! Thank you for your �onsideration, M�ry Reilly Pruneridge A�e, Cupertina CA -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Allen [�nai.lta:patal].en�Ume.rom] Lett Sent: Thursday, 7une 27, 2013 Z0:59 aM � E75 Ta: Ci#y Council Subject: 5upport Apple My dear ele�ted afficials , I'm writing you in support ❑f the new Apple, in�. �ampus. Please help them in anyway yau �an tv speed their planed new ❑ffi�es. Best regards, Rat and Charlene Allen 10191 Vista �ri�e Cupertin❑ , CA Sent fram my iPad Sest regards Pat Allen Patall�n[�mBC.COm Lett E76 From: Pam Milam [mailto:pam.�l�ilam@gmail.carr�] 5ent: Thursday,]une Z7, Z�i3 11:54 AM To: Caty Council SubjeGt: We support the new appie campus and k�eir de5ire to remain in Cupertin�. Cuper#ino is Apple!?! Parr�and Bill Milam Fram: Carmichael PauE [n�ailto:carmi�hael123 c�com�ast.net] Lett Sent:Yhursday,]une 27, 2013 9:10 AN} To: City CDUntif E]] 5ubject: 5uppart Apple Campus II Lett Fr�m: migdat[n�ail�o.m+qdatf�a�aoi.�arn� E78 Sent:Thursday, ]une�7, 2013 8:�2 AM T�: City CflunCil 5uhject: appie campus supp�rt apple Campus suppart From: m�ic�hetti�a��amcast.net [mailta:m�icehetti a}corr�cast.�et] 5ent: Wedrsesday,June 26, 2013 11:51 AM Lett Ta: City Cauncil E79 Subject: Appfe Constructian-yes ❑ear counci! memhers, I support the Apple constructian proje�t as is without modification---Thanlc Yau---Mi�hael Picch�tti Frtim: Andrew P�rk [mailia:iiitalciri4�ensanC7gmail.com] Lett 5ent: TueSday, June 25, 2413 3.Q:a4 AM E80 Ta: City Coun�il Suhject: Support fflr Apple Campus 2 1 wo�ild like to re�ister my siipport for Apple cam�us 2 -----flriginal Message----- Lett From: Linda Pickering [mai}�ta:paCkSnOmOSS[n7aD}�.[am] E81 Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:56 PM TQ: City Caun�il Subject: Regarding Apple eampus We have been in the Cupertina area for aver 59 years we will be living rigfit arross the street from the Apple �ampus our apinivn is that 7hey will make great neighhars, aon and Linda Pi�keri.ng -----�riginal N�essage--___ Frvm: Liliana Wilson [mailto:lewl�mac.�om] Lett Sent: Thursday, 3une 20, 2013 5:28 PM To: City Coun�il E82 Subje�t: I support the Apple � Campus Thank y�u s❑ muc�, Lily Wilson Cupertinv, CA Lett -----�riginal Message----- E83 From: Lang Nguyen [mailta:lqngn�uyen95014{�lyanoa.ca�n] Sent: Thursday, ]une Z0, 2913 3:07 PM Tq: City Council 5ubject: Apple Campus Z Oear Sir�Madame: I am supporting this prOject and �an not wait tq see the �ompletiqn. �ong Nguyen 10585 Iarry way Cupertinp, �a 95014 Fr�m: Lever Wang mai]Ep:lev�r.wanqC�qmail.�om] Lett Sent:Thursday,]une Z0, 2�13 Z:59 PNl 7a:Ciry Cauncil E84 Se�hject: We support Appie Campus�! We suppnrt Apple Cam��uti?. Pfease reQister me a�id my I�amily i�#��4 ati the tilrc�n� Suppnrter�of Ap�le C�»ZpuS � We h�ve li�ed i�� Cu�?ertina Far rnnre rh��n 3f}yearti. Thani�ti. Levcr.Nina.StrPhani�. Sa�nantha Wang On Sat. ]u�i I5,2fl 13 at�3:1�PM, frankvaG•ak �fr.�r�k.��,,kr�r?�ttr_r3ec� wrate: Lett �ear City Caunci! E85 I support the Apple 2 Campus proje�t Frank Vavak Qii F'ri, !un 14, 2�13 at 1�:55 .qM. Da�e E�ussell �cia�erussLll I i�;I�l��c.�o�z�� w��ute: Lett I]ear Cupertino City Cnuncil. E86 I have been a home o�vner-resident ot Cupertino sinre t�ie yea�'2t}�0,and worked in the city sin�e 1958. 1 sup��ort tl�e Apple Campais 2 project, and prefer that you appra�•e Apple's pla�is to he�in constnictirn; �vitfi alI duz ener�y. 5sticere€y. David M. Rtiss�il 2?79� �lerredes Roarl C'upertsno, CA �501�} Lett E87 -----flriginal Message----- Fram: Jun NishimUra [�raailta:i�n509,�3cloud.corn] Sent: htonday, ]une 17, Z�13 3:45 PhM1 To: Cifiy Caunci 1 5ubject: Apple Campus � T❑ the Cupertino City Cauncil I feel it is aur privilege to keep Apple Inc. in the �iYy. Please try ta keep the �ompany in our neighbdr. 7�n Nishimura Cupertino, CR Lett From: Karlye Adair[mailta:ad�ir�potspecialist@yaha�.caml E88 5ent: Sunday,June ].6, 2�13 7:21 PM To: City Council 5ubject:5uppart Apple Campus 2 We are so excited t�have Apple cainpi�s ii�Cupertir�a. T'he manv jobs and benefits brou�lit to aur cQiY�muniry. We w•elrome them ��itl�open arn3s. Karlve Adair Adair Foot Specialist ada i rfaotspec i a l ist.cam Dn Wed,.lun l2, �D l3 at?:d8 Pf�1, V. Dean Skeels�d5ske�lti�ir cnmcas�,net�wrote: Lett I sup��rt the Apple 2 can�pus ! E89 V. Dean Skeels Frnm: L.arry Dean [mailta:LD?an95fll.�n�omcast.net] Seret: Wednesday, ]une lZ, ZD13 5:46 PNf Lett Tn: Ciry Cauncil E90 Suhject: Support A�ple Campus 2 Dear Council Members—I heartily support the new Apple Campus praject. Best regards, Larry qean From: Mark Ver�an [maiEto:marky�ridget�ine.com] Lett Sent: Wednesday, ]une 12, 2013 11:19 AM To:City Council E91 Suhje�t: Support Appfe Campus z I have heen working in Cupertino sin�e 1987 and I love the city. I strongly support the Apple Campus 2 pro�ect. NIark Vernnn I!'re,sicic•nt cg CO!] � � �� E v � � � Ynkl� s � � t marky@ridgewine.cam �.i�. I��r f 4 I 11 !.'i:�!r�oiii�,, r� � �1;1�1� FrQm:jahn bruzus[mailto:ibr�rusc�yahoa.�om� Sent: Wedr�esday,]une 12, 2013 11:�fi AM Lett 70: City Counef{ Subject: Suppart Appfe Campus Z E92 [ tiu��r�th�n�•��• :1P�1�•[:.itn��is ? .Tohn gruzus �rom: Humphrey Chaw [��iit�:hw�how�"_u�gmai.l.c.om] Sent:Tuesday,]��e 11, 2013 9:32 PM Lett To: City Coun�il Su6ject:Apple Campus Z E93 Tc�Whc�m lt May Concern: I Su}�po��t Apple Campus � 5incerely. Humphrey Chow -----�riginal Message----- From: Jane 7so [rnailto.kkjtso�0.�aol,com] Lett Sent: T�esday,]une 11, �4�3 9:5fi AiN E94 To: City Cauneil Subject: Appie campus 2 I suppnrt App#e campus 2 project. From: ]anet Verson [mailto:j�erson@gmail.com} Lett Sent: Tuesday,]une 11, 2�13 I1:�9 AM Tv: City Council E95 Su6ject: New Camp�s fnr Apple ❑ear City Council: I am a resident af Cupertino and would like to famlally etidorse t3te new �ampus for Apple. Sincerely, .Taiiet Versasi -----flriginal Message----- From: Edward M 3anes fn�ailt�:tedjc�nPS�4Ca�ieloutl�com] Lett 5ent: Mqnday, ]une 1�, 2�13 5:07 PN! Ta: City Cou�ci� E96 Su�ject: Apple Campus� I support App�e Campus 2. Ted ]ones �3SQ� Cristff Rey ar. Unit 3Z7� Cupertino, �A 95014 -----original �lessage----- Lett Frqm: Betty Eskeldsqn [�nailto:betsyesl:eldsan{l�mail.�_ain] Sent: Monday, ]une z0, z0�3 a:2s ��t Eg] To: City Council 5ubje�t: App1e Campus 2 I am excited ahout the new Campus that Apple wants to build in Cupertino. I think it wii� be a wonderful additi4n ta ❑ut city tp cantinue making Cupertino a draw for the world. I hvpe it will be suppvrted hy our City Council. 6etsy Eskeldson, 16 year Cupertin❑ resident From: Elena Seremeta Finailto:25erem�taL�gmaii.com] Lett Sent: Monday,�une 1�, 2Q13 11:3�AM E98 Ta: City Council 5uh;ect:App1e Headquarter My ��ame is E�ena Serameta, [ li�e i�� C'upestino. 1(3G91 Hale P�aCe and l wa��t tv register far my family support for Apple Campus 2. Best Regards. Eie:la SareEneta -----ariginal �M1essage----- Letf Frpm: aiana Lvredv [mailta:loredode�aaol.cam] 5ent: 5unday, 7une 99, 2913 1:07 PM E99 To: City Cauncil 5ubjeGt: I support new apple �ampus Make it happen. Resident Amelia �t �upertino. Diana Lett From:]erry McLeod [mailto:i�cleod_l r�yahoa.cam] E100 Sent: 5at�rday, ]une 0$, 2013 6:56 AM Tv: Ciry Council Suhject: I wish to pledge my support of khe new Apple campus Regards 7erry McLeod From:jaseph�ppe! [n�aNto�iep el a. aebell.net Sent: 5aturday,]une Q8, 2�13 2:54 PM Lett To: City Caur�ci4 Suhject:Apple Campusz E101 �bIQSI�t]13 As resi�lents of C�:�ertinu,we fu11y�p�7rove af the pla�i for tlye new Apple Campus in oi�r ciry and tu��e City Coui�cil ta approve tlie projzcl withotit funher delay_ Appl�has hNen a good cnrparate citiz�n and des�r�•es our ap�reciatian an�3 speedy appra��a!of their latest submissian ta the Council so t3��y rnay ma�e fqr4�a�d witli the canstr�ictipn of their new �a mpus. Joseph and Elizahetli Eppel -----�riginal Message----- From: 5�etlana ICakosh�ili [�r+ailta:5�eta(�kvitka.rorn] Leff 5ent: Frid�y, 3une @7, 2013 1:12 PM 70: City Cauncil E102 5ubje�t: Apple Campus I love the idea of Yhe apple campus and I think it would be �ery henefiriary to the [ity of Cupertino as a whole. ]ust my two �ents. From: eahram Vazindel [mailto:laardl�arQnLyahoo_��m] Sent: Friday,June�7, 2013 �:06 PI� Ta: City Countil Lett Cc: applecampus?�a�apple.com Subject:Appfe Campus 2 E103 To Whom It Mav Canrer�zed, [ ful ly st�pport Apple Campus 2 praject. Tl�a»ks, Bahram Vazindel 188Cz1 Barnharz A�etjiie Cupertin�,CA 9�414 -----Original Message----- From: warmke, Doug [mailta:dau� waf^rrmke�ilm�ntdr'.Cnm] Lett 5ent: Thursday, ]une 05, 2913 I2:S3 PM ro: City Coun�il E104 Subje�t: Apple Campus Z Hi City Cauncil, I strongly support Apple Campus 2 in Cupertino. Thank yau, �oug Warm[ce 16965 5panish Dak Cnurt Cupertino, CA 95014 Fram: chirag patel[m�ift�:ccpatelCa�yahoo.rom] Lett 5snt:7hurs�ay,]ur�e 06, 2D13 12:52 PM E105 Ta:City Cauncil 5ubject: I support Apple 2 Cam�us. From:A�and �'Souza [maiiLo:anandds?4 a�qmaiE.rom] Lett Sent: Thursday,]une D5, 2a13 12:51 Pi+'I To:City Council E106 Su6ject: Re: Apple Campus� I-1 i: I fani�ally tiupport the cfeatic�n of'Apple Cam�au5? ii3 Ci3pertiizo. Anand From:Alex Pashintsev[mailto:apas�in�se��hotmail.�am] 5ent:Thursday, ]une Dfi, ?D13 1Z:42 PN! Lett 70: City CounciG Subject: RE: Apple Campus Z E107 I da�ast my support! Alex Pashintsev 2269a 5an Juan rd, Cupertino,CA -----Clri.ginal Message----- Fram: ❑a�id EFrerhardt [mailta:sawdustda�e[a�rorr�cast.net] Leff Sent: Thursday, �une e�, zei� rz:i9 PM E108 To: City Coun�il 5ubject: Apple Campus 2 Please [aaperate and assist Apple ta build a world class campus. ❑a�id and Loreta El�erhardt 10320 Las �nclas Way, Cupertino From: Bflb��onna 5[i?�aiito_danrptXa�sbcglobal_�etJ Lett Sent:Thursday, ]une�5, 2013 1�:35 PM Ta: Ciry Counci� E109 5ubject:Appte headquarters My family iti in F��vnr i�f allnwii��th�huildin�c�f'�he ne��• Headyuac�[ery htr� iii Cupertino. The�31y��•oul�l f�u�4 ln��e titiipi{!�iot �n wa�� to rnaintain tlie r�latior��hip iE h;iti�viih Ap�l�. -----Original Message----- From: Gary ]anes [+nailto: ='oneshane� ahon.�wia] Sent: Thursday, 7une 66, 2013 32:Z1 PNI Letf To: City Coun[il 5ubjeet: Apple Campus 2 E1 1� i support the buiZding af Apple Campus TI. Gary E 7ones Cupertino, CA -----original r�essage----- From: pavid Kvpels [maiFtO.s}�epok±;rttN.epnr] Lett 5ent: 7hursday, ]une 05, 2013 Y�:19 PM Tv: City Caun�il E1 1 1 Cc: ICopels Barbara Suhjert: Apple 5upport My name is ❑a�id ICopels and my family has l��ed in Cupertin❑ far the past 35 years. We strangly support the Apple Campus 2 praje�t. pavid Kvpels 1616] 6ilich Place 95�14 -----original Message----- From: pIANE BEAtJaE7 [mailto;k�eaudet�irls(n7me.��m] Letf 5ent: Thursday, ]une 05, 2013 12:16 PM To: City CounCil E1 1 2 Subject: Go apple,,,. Can't wait t❑ see the new hu3lding �ompleted. Apple is a great b�siness ta have in our �oinmunity. piane 6eaudet From: ahash��7ac�arwalh4me.�4m [maillfl_akash�anvalhome.�am]Qn Betsalf Qf Akash Agarwal 5ent:Thursday,]une D6, 2013 1:48 PN! Lett Ta: City counci! E113 Subject: Register 5upport For Apple Campus Z Ati u IiFe-ton�retiident of Cuperlinu. I'd like to re�i�t�r my ti�ip}�vrt for APple Camputi 2. Than�CS, Akash Agarwal VP o�Mar�Ceting, StudyClau�i Inc. Fram:Gopakumar PPllai [maiir�r•h4opakumar�u�hptmail.�om] Sent:Thursday, ]une Ofi, zfl13 2:37 PM Lett To: City Counril Suhjeet: Suppart For Appte Campus� E114 {�i, k am a resident Qf Cupertino and would Eitce ta support Apple Campus 2 in Cupertino. disciaimer: I am npt an employee of Apple --Gopakumar Pillai -----�riginal Message----- Lett Fram: �arbone.�upertinfl[al�niail.com [mailta:carbone.cupertina[ril�mail.�orn] Sent: Thursday, �une a�, z�� z:3� Pr� E1 1 5 To: City Coun�il 5ubject: Apple campus 2 Ta whom it [an[erns: Please apprave Apple campus 2. We've been waiting �or tihe construrtian whirh is way aver due. I qelie�e we as residents all want it t❑ happen. Many thanEcs for your con�ern. Cheers, -�iana From: 6alakrishnan Thyagarajan [mailto;b�tl��QaC�gmail,caml 5ent:�hursday,]une Q5, �013 3:27 PM Lett To:City�oun�il E116 5ubject: 5upport Apple Camus Z Hi. I liv� in C u�s.rtino un[f iuy nasne iti Balakritihua«Thyagarajun. I ti•riuld lil:e lc�r��.�ititer h}� tiiirp[�rl iirr A��rl� Campu� � 7'lzank, Baia From:Ginfl GuglieEmeili [mailta_:q�noi_c1uq��yah_o_o,�om� Sent:Thursday, ]une Q5, Z013 4:40 PM Lett 70: City Council Su6ject:appfe eampus-2 E11] ! supporl the construction of'1he new A�ple�a�npus as� Hamestead Rd. in Cu�ertinn-Si�msy4ale. Gsno Gu�*lielmelli. lG?l W�x��in�A�e Sunny�ale. �in�.i+ii��wi'G�alinc�.�.o�z�. -----Originai Message----- From: Dipesh Maini [inailtn:dipeshmaini{�yahoa.�ona7 Leff S�nt: 7hursday, ]une 05, 2013 8:1� PM ro: City coun�il E1 1 g Cc: a�ple�_a_mpusz[�apple.�om S�bjert: 5uppvrt fvr Apple Campus 2 I support Apple Campus 2 in Cupertino THanks Qipesh Maini -----Drigi.nal Message----- From: g�n md [uiailto;�ra�e.nadolnv��mail.��m] Letf 5ent: �hursday, ]une 0S, 2�13 4:81 PM r❑: czty councxl E1 1 9 5uhject: We whQleheartedly support the apple �ampus proje�t as autlined. 5in�erely Gra�e Nadnlny Mo and Greg Hilbrich 1@547 Manzanita Road Cupertina CA 95914 Lett -----priginal Nlessage----- E12� Frpm; erosiak[r�com�ast.net tmailta:erosiak(a��ai�i�ast_net] 5ent: Thursday, 7une 06, �013 9:35 PM Ta: City Caun�il 5ubje�t: New Apple Campus I am sencfing this in support ❑f Apple Computer and the new eampus they are proposing. Apple has been an ex�ellent �orporate neighbor and deser�es appra�al ❑f their plans. It is good far Cupertina and we urge you to appro�e Apple's plans. Sincerely, Ed & Linda kosiak Cupertino, CR -----Original Message----- Letf From: Cynthia lCoilerer [naailtc�:��lc_o_ller_er�i�gmai�_.��m] E121 5ent: Thursday, 7une 05, 2013 11:43 PM �v: City Coun�il Subject: Apple Campus 2 I ha�e heen a Cupertina resident far 35 years and fully support the praposed new Apple Campus. -----Qriginal Message----- From: Aykut [mailto:ay�utyarar•basru�yahoa.�pm] Lett Sent: Thursday, 7�ne @6, 2013 11:45 PIN rv: city council E1 22 Suhje�t: App3e �ampus 2 suppvrt I willingly support A{�ple 2 campus. Aykut Yararhas 20030 Radrigues a�e apt k Cupertina �a 9507.4 -----original Message----- From: Gevrge Crosby [mailt�;�eprge�rpsby(n7m2.��m] Lett Sent: �hursday, June 06, 2013 1:21 PM To: City Caun�il E1 23 5ubject: Apple Campus I'm 1@0% for building the Apple Campus. Regards George Crosby 2350@ Crist❑ Rey ❑rive Cpertin❑ Letter ID 500110 Lett E124 Name Robert Hoose Address 10394 Bret A�e City,5tate Zip Gupertino, GA 95Q14 Emai I hoose22�att.net Subject Apple 2 Comment The last thing we need is Appie moving aut of Cupertino. Letter ID 5flQ1afl Lett Name E125 Address City,5tate Zip ,CA Email Sut�ject Home Town Support-Rpple Campus 2 Cvmment I am in full support fqt Apple Campus 2!Lqoks great and will �e a great asset for Cupertino. Letter ID 5�D085 Name ,�ahn Zirelli Lett E126 Address 65� M�rtin Ave City,State 2ip Santa�lara,�A 95050 Email jzirelliLo7recology.�om Subje�t 5upport of Apple II Campus Camment I suppart the Apple II campus in the City af Cupertino.As the Generai Manager ot Recology Cupertino and past Presidant of teh Cupertino Chamber of Commer�e,their new corporate headquarters will benefit aff of the residents and businesses. Apple is a great carporate partner in teh community,scholls and local organizations. LetterlD 5DQ�84 Name Maxim Zaika Lett Address sdf,sdfgt� E127 Clty,State Zip Cu�ertino,CA 95Q15 Email mak.zaika2fl13[�gmail.cam Su bjeGt Comment 3TO KnaccHO!!!P! �Translation: "This is cool!!!!!"] Letter Ia 500a81 Lett Name GA Salinas E128 Address City,State Zip Laredo,TX Email 5ubject Cnmment The Apple project has the world watching.iVew opportunity to shawcase new technologies! Letter ID 5ooasz Lett Name Andrew Park E129 Address 20488 Stevens Creek 81vd,#1515 City,5tate Zip Cupertino,CA 95�14 �mail hftokirikensan@gmail.�am 5uhject I support Apple Campus 2 Camment Subject says it all. Have a good day! LetterlQ 5��055 Lett Name MAJEO A5 E130 Address saudi, rrtakkah City,5tate Z�p makkah,CA 12345 Email majed.mas@�otmail.com Suhject ma Comment I love you sa rr�uch,Apple an[f always keep together forever LetterlD 50a�53 Lett Name �arol wang E131 Address 1 Q925 n wolfe Rd Ciiy,5tate Zip Cupertino,CR 95414 Email carol@statemicro.com 5u6ject Comment We suppart Apple Campus 2 LetterlD 500d52 Lett Name Jar�e Tan E132 Address 11790 Ridge Creek Ct City,State Zip Cupertino,CA 95a14 Email jtan888@gmail.com 5uhject Comment I'm fully supparfing the new Apple Campus 2 project in Cupertino. It's great to have such a great company located in our city Letterl� SOOa51 Lett Hame Le�er Wang E133 Address 1185 Candlefight Way City,5tate Zip Cupertina, CA 95D14 Email [e�er.wang@gmail.com Subject We support Apple Campus 2 Camment Hell❑, We support Appfe Campus 2. Please register me and my f�mily pf 4 8S the strvng supparters of Apple Campus 2. We ha�e lived in Cupertina for mare than 3D years. Thanks, Le�er, Nina,5tephanie, 5amantha Wang Letter ID 5flfl04a Lett Name 5tella Qu E134 Address City,State Zip Cupertina, CA 95014 Email Subject Camment Apple is the glory of America today.And the Silicon Valfey here at Cafifornia. Even more so, Cupertino, where technolagy flourishes day and night.8ei�g a resider�t of Cupertino is a true honor, especially because we are ahle to witness the growth of Apple.Thraugh the rapid growth df Apple,we all penefit from the great causes that affect us greatly here and now.And I reaily have to say, I am so proud of Apple, proud of heing part of the Apple community, and proud of heing ahle ta live so clase to it. I have high hapes far you to rise to the next level. Apple Campus 2,agreed. Thank You. 5tella Qu Letter ID 50aD35 Lett Name paulette Altmaier E135 Address City,State Zip Cupertinv, CA cupertino Emai[ paltmaie@yahoo.com Subject Apple Campus-IeYs be a can-do�ity! Comment I am strongly suppartive of this praject,anci I am N�T an Apple employee.We need to support�isianary projects, and be a can-do city!This project will make us proud, IeYs go for it! Letter la 5DDfl31 Name Rabert Stern Lett E136 Address 19 a0fl Via 5arrento City,State�ip Cupartno, CA 95�14 Emaif sternrc rCDrnac.com 5uhject Approval of Apple Campus 2 Development Comment I wholly endorse Apple's praposed developmen#af a second campus in Cuperfino. Frnm: I�yke and piane Luu[mail[o_miuufam�Iv��_maii.�nm] 5ent: Monday,3uly 22,20i3 1:4�PM Leff Ta:Ciry Cfluncil Suhject: I SUPPORT APPLE 2 E137 Pl�as�tipe�cl tip a��pr[rv,il t�f APPLE Cam��uti?ir�Cup�riinc�. Pu�Cu��eriinn nn the map! L)(]NQT LE`l"APP�.E MQVE TQ ANC]'T't3E.R C[71',P��ASE. THANK Y�LJ. I�UL] FAM[l.Y Frnm: �iane A Nguyen[mailt�;c;aneannrlao��gmail.com.] Lett sant: Monday,�uiy z2, 2�13 1:34 PM E138 Ta:City Counci! 5ubject:I suppor#APPLE Campus Z i�upport APPLE Cam�uti?. Plcati�tipeed u�fhe ap��ro�al an:�con.structinn�+rt�re�s ti«tha! f�PPLE tan 5tay in nur cily. C u�1C�t i stp. 5incer�ly. ❑i�nC N�uyen ]0�4?8 GLENC�E DA CUPERTfND CA 95{}I:� �UR-718-3i]57 From: Guna Suriyd [mailto:guna suriya@y�hao.�am] 5ent: Monday,3uiy��, Zq13 ��,16 PM Lett To: Ciry Council E139 Subje�t: I 5uppD�t for Apple Cam�u5�