Exhibit CC/PC 10-01-13 #1 Written CommunicationsKaren B. Guerin
From:
David K p is [slep k@me.c ]
Sent:
Friday, September t 201 3:17 AM
To:
City Councill
:
Kpels Barbara
Subject:
Apple Carpus
My name is David Kopek and 1 and ray family have lived at 10161 Which Place., Cupertino for
the past 37 years.
We strongly believe that is in the best interests of our Cupertino community to rule every
possible accommodation to ensure that construction of Apple Campus 2 is approved.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sent from my iPhone
I
Karen B, Guerin
From: Carlos MME illy [carlos. m i I ly@g mail, cor ]
Seat: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:00 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple Campus
Hi City Council,
I'm waiting to express my support for the proposed Apple Campus development. It's great to
have a business lie Apple here in Cupertino, so I hope you will do everything possible to
male their permit approvals and such go quickly and smoothly.
Carlos McEvilly
21111 Red Fir Ct.
Cupertino, CA 95014
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: David Eberhardt [ awdu td v @ om t.n t]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 201 9:23 AM
T: City Council
Subject: Apple campus
I strongly urge support of the proposed Apple carpus... this is a once-in- a-lifetime
opportunity For Cupertino AND Silicon Valley
David Eberhardt, a 50+ year Cupertino resident
I
Karen B, Guerin
From: Debbie Bergant [db rgant @gm il.00r ]
Seat: Friday, September 27, 201 11:13 AM
To: City Council
Cc: appleoarnpus2 @apple, corn
Subject: Apple 2
Dear City Council members.,
I have been a Cupertino resident for over 20 gears. I am so excited to be living in the city
of Apple's world Headquarters. I am also encouraging you to allow the new Apple 2 Carpus to
go forward speedily!
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Debbie Bergant
Sent from Debbie
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: Balararn Nair [ alarar .nair @gmail.eom]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:35 P!
To: City Council
Subject: Support for Apple Campus
Dear Sir or Madam,
We residents of Cupertino strongly support the development of Apple Campus 2.
Cupertino is Apple. Apple is the PRIDE of Cupertino. All over the world Cupertino is l nown because ofApple
and we are so proud, blessed, humbled and privileged to be associated with this great innovator of the 21st
century - Apple. As Apple is the lamest taxpayer and revenue generator for the city It 1s a- no- rainer to approve
the development of this world class company's campus 2.
We look forward to the ground breaking after your approval.
S
xncerel,
al ar a
Nair & Sumathy Panxcker
20632 Cheryl Dir
Cupertino
CA 95014
Karen B. Guerin
From: Bill Liu [bliu4 @yahoo.comJ
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 2:04 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple Carpus 11
Cupertino City Council,
We are support this project and urge our city council to approve this project as soon as possible.
This is a very important matter and will benefit the City of Cupertino a lot.
Best regards
Bill Shih Hua Liu
7988 I u kin Drive
Cupertino, CA 95014
Karen B. Guerin
From: Balakri hnan Thya aralan [bath ra a@ mail. com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 201 10:28 PM
T: City Council
Subject: Support of Apple Campus 2
1,
I am a resident of Cupertino and I extend my support for Apple Campus 2
Bala T ya arajan
19660 Auburn Dr
Cupertino, C
Thanks
Bala
Caren B. Guerin
From: Barbara Chang [b rb r . h ng@a grnail. rn]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 7:44 AM
T: City Council
Subject: i support Apple Campus
Dear City Council members,
Z fully support Apple Campus 2.
It will bring great benefits to our city.
Barbara Chang
Sent from my iPhn
1
Karen B. Guerin
From: Lyn Faust [lynfaust@a yah . mj
Seat: Sunday, September 29, 2013 11 : 18 Al l
To: Lyn Faust
: Barry Chang; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; Food Sinks; Gilbert Wong
Subject: Poposad Apple Carpus
FYI - An article of possible interest on the proposed Apple Campus from the LA Times
.tt : fw.t Mej 6
Lyn Faust
11033 Canyon Vista ]fir.
Cupertino, CA
Karen B, Guerin
From: Ari Katz [arikat 33 @a gmail.eom]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 3:58 Poll
T: City Council
Subject: My Support for Apple Campus
Dear Members of the Cupert�no City Council,
Please note that my wife and I are in support of Apple establishing /building Carpus 2 in our
City of Cupertino. This Carpus is essential to the economic growth and future success of our
wonderful City,
We would lie to see you approve the project ASAP so construction can began,
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Are, and Debbie Katz
10347 Anson Ave.
Cupertino, CA 95014
408 - 446 -0505
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: Brian ong [ n b @y h, r]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 201 12:05 PM
To: Orrin Mahoney
Subject: Apple and The City of Cupertino
Dear Mayor Mahoney,
,after reading the L.A. Times article "Is Cupertino Sacrificing it's Core to the Apple", I was amazed over
the fact that Cupertino refunds 0% of the sales tax of Apple's sales back to Apple.
No sales tax should be refunded at all to Apple. You are in a position to change that. Apple's profit last year was
.2 billion on 6 billion f revenue. The attl'cle states your planning rtment ha s only one laptop to .ate, and
that you
ask.ed Apple to loan a laptop and a smart board. The $6.4 nffion refunded last year is such a small ainount of
Apple's revenue, but oral es a big difference in upertu-i 's small budget. There would be no risk to demanding that
Apple pay its fair share of sales taxes to the
city of Cupertino; believe ine, they will not pack and leave over a fear million dollars. You must stand up for the
people of Cupetti o and represent them well-being, not the demands of a large corporation, Apple produces
products we all love and appreciate, but remember just lire Chevron or Exxon, they are a corporation; they worry
about their bottom lire and their stock prices.
You should also demand that that roads around the new carnpus be public easements; especially the road between
the existing Apple campus and the newly acquire HP land. It was written that Deals life to walk on Ptuneridge Ave,
If you look t large developments in other cities, such as Los Angeles, developers will often fund public parks and
wally ys adjacent to the land that is being developed.
Lil ewi e, Apple should fund public parks and landscaped walla rs that locals life to use that surround the
campus, instead of shielding it fiom the public. (Allow the public to see a model of the ca apus so they see how It
x iR blend in with the surrounding coi ni nunity ..apple
should also pay for traffic signals and street -improvements that lead into the cainpus to alleviate any predicted
increase in traffic.
By doing this, Apple will be a wcicotne neighbor and a team inernber of the city of Cupertino,
lepectfiflly yours,
Brian Ong
iverside, CA
Karen B, Guerin
From: Donna Austin [prim den l a@com st n t]
Seat: Monday, September 30, 201 12:20 PM
T: City Council
Subject: Apple Campus
I plan to attend the city council meeting on Tuesday Oct 2. 1 want to register my .support for
this project. It is a great benefit to the city and to the citizens of Cupertino.
Donna Austin
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: Sam Ashknaz [ em @EDC upertino. om)
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:59 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Carpus
Hello,
i strongly support Apple Campus 2. This will be the best thing ever happened to the city of Cupertino.
Will Help local businesses to grow.
Thant,
Sam Ashknaz
Owner/Operator
Erik's DefiCaf6
19652 Stevens Creek Blvd
Cupertino, CA. 95014
Ph: 408 - 973 -9898
xY 408 - 973 -0753
Karen B. Guerin
From: Warmke, Doug [douq �w rmke@a m ntorF orn]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 2 :07 P11,II
To: City Council
Subject: I like Apple Carpus 2
Hello City Council,
I like Apple Campus 2 and I hope you will male all the required approvals.
I think it will be very good For our City.
Bost regards,
Doug Warmke
10066 Spanish oak Court
Cupertino, CA 95014
1
Karen B. Guerin
From: George Crosby [ oorge rob @me, orn]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 2.18 PIVI
T: City Council
Subject: Apple campus
My wife and T live in Cupertino and are in favor of the Apple Campus plan.
George and Louise ?Crosby
Sent from my iPad
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: John Zirelfl U irelli @re olo y. om]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 3.24 P
To: City Council
Subject: Apple Campus 2 Support
I support the new Apple Campus'2 project and ask that the city council approve the project In the upcoming council
meeting.
As an active member of the community, Past President of the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce and current board
member, the Apple Campus 2 project will be a once in a lifetime opportunity that all residents, businesses, schools,
community and city government will benefit from.
Apple is a great corporate partner and we are fortunate to have a company who wants to keep their roots in Cupertino
and continue their growth.
Please move the Apple Campus 2 project forward for approval as proposed.
Thanou
John Zirelli
General Manager
e l r T SOU-t a
1� Martin Avenue }`'�I 408-368.17-76 ��t : l a r� ,C► ry y / + I I r 95050-2914
/� 7J /� y�+'y
�1 • 408.588•7224 f '�+ 4 IYC.., I i i x F`I I l I r, �- W 1 1 1
'vII s E ZERO
Karen B. Guerin
From: Edward Hirsh field [ l it l uls @ rthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 3;45 PM
T: City Council
Subject: Apple Carpus
Honored Councilpersons,
As a 50 year Cupertino homeowner I mile from the proposed Campus, I fuller
construction. I believe that it is in all our interests for it to begin
without undo impediments by the City,
Ed Hirshfield
734 Stendhal Lane
Cupertino
Sent from my iPhone
I
support it
as soon as possible
Karen B. Guerin
From: : Grace NadoIny [gra .nadolny mail. om]
Seat: Monday, September 30, 201 4:18 Pull
T: City Council
Subject: Apple 2 carpus support
Our -Family at 10547 man anitaw court Cupertino wholeheartedly support proceeding with the
apple 2 campus plans . Please ,let us know if you reed our help to implement
Best regards
Grace nadoIny Ord
Greg Hilbrich
Sent -from my iPhone
I
CC/PC 1 -1 -13 Item 1
Karen B. Guerin
From: Filing Wang [li r n@a y hee.eom]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 4:23 PM
`fro: City Council
Dear City Council,
I continued support Apple Campus 2. The new building will male Cupertino City more prosperous and boost
the property values in the surrounding areas.
It will also bring tax revenue that allows Cupertino to implement a lot of 'improvements in the city.
As a Cupertino resident for 27 years, I feel proud and lucky that Apple Computer has chosen to stay and expand
in Cupertino.
Please approve the prof e et and help therm out to re ak ground as soon as possible.
Gina Wang
Karen B. Guerin
From: D r i Hodder [d r ih dd r@ tt,net]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 201 4:46 Pull
T: City Council
Subject: Apple
This email is to express my continued support of Apple
here in Cupertino. I've lived here my entire 49 years and
have taken tremendous pride in the growth of my home
town. Apple has a huge part of that. I feel grateful that
Apple started here and has grown here. As a business
owner, student and parent I feel that Apple has
contributed to the prosperity of my town and to me. I
thrilled about the new campus!
Dard Hodder
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: GuntlyDuffyF@mily@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:53 PIVI
To: City Council
Subject: Apple Carpus Support
Dear Cupertino City Council,
Please regards this message as our support of the Apple carpus. Apple represents a critical
business entity within Cupertino, as it brings my different resources to the city, including takes,
jobs, community outreach and global recognition. We have (and will continue) to attend the related
city meetings on this issue. We know that Apple is doing everything that is required of them on the
build, though I know there are a few particulars which I hope will be resolved. Just today, Apple was
ranked the top company in the WORLD, , surpassing Coca - Cola. There is a reason for that. We
would be fools to let something file this slip away. Thank you council members.
Torn Gently
Angeles Duffy
Phar Lap Drive
Karen B. Guerin
From: Darrel Lum [drlum @pa bell.net]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 11:42 PM
To: Orrin Mahoney; Gilbert Wong; Barry Chang; Mark Santoro; Rod Sinks; Don Sun; Paul Brophy;
Winnie Lee; City Council; City of Cupertino Planning Dept.
: David Brandt; Aarti Shriva to a; Carol Atwood; Carol Korade
Subject: Planning Commission/City Council Study Session on Apple Carpus
Attachments: Sales Tax Agreement @PC- 1 .pdf; Fiscal Impact Analysis PC- CC.pdf; Mitigation -
Traffio @PC #CC 1 .pdf; Mitigation-Housing P - .pdf; Community Benefits-As Condition
of Approval PC- CC.pdf; Community Benefits-Not As Condition of Approval@PC-CC 2013,pdf
Please find attachments submitted by Concerned Citizens of Cupertino for your consideration at Planning Commission/City
Council Study Session
on Apple Campus 2 on October 1, 2013.
Section 3.5 Tax Consulting Agreement
Agree with deletion of Section 2 (c), (d) and (e)
Agree with addition of new Section Z (c)
Agree with "Apple represents that it has not entered into a tax
consulting agreement, similar to the existing Tax Consulting Agreement,
with any other city and /or county in California, and Apple agrees not to
do so during the term of this Agreement."
Concerned about the phrase "tax consulting agreement,
similar to the existing Tax Consulting Agreement"
Concerned about the location "any other city and /or county
In California" in view of the fact that Apple has sales offices
Reno, Nevada; Austin, Texas and in the country of Ireland.
Agree with the assistance of Apple in any administrative
proceedings by the Board of Equalization relaying to whether the City is
the proper point of sale location.
Concerned with the recent history that:
"The Board of l,quali ation 1 is challenging the way sales tax load
previously been reported by one of our top sales tax generators. If the BO
determines that the sales tax was reported improperly, it could result in the City
being required to pay back $10.6 million in prior years sales taxes in addition to
any subsequent revenues received from this r an r."
Source: 2013-2014 Bu dget
City of Cupertino
Page
Fiscal Impact Analysis
APPLE COMMISSIONED ITS OWN FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
CITY OF CUPERTINO COMMISSIONED A PEER REVIEW OF THE APPLE
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS., IT ONLY ANALYZE THE APPLE FISCAL
IMPACT REPORT; IT DOSS NOT PRESENT FISCAL IMPACT FROM THE
CITY OF CUPERTINO'S POINT OF VIEW
Comment:
AN INDEPENDENT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN
THIS ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT BECAUSE WE ANTICIPATE THAT THE
CITY WILL ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRID[NG CONSIDERATIONS,
FINDING THAT THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF THE PROJECT, AS PRESENTED IN
THE REPORT "ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS GENERATED BY APPLE IN
CUPERTINO,-, CURRENT FACILITIES AND APPLE CAMPUS 2" BY THE
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES PREPARED FOR APPLE, OUTWEIGHS
SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS IN THE DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
A INDEPENDENT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (FIA) WILL PROVIDE
INFORMATION THAT WILL INFORM THE COUNCIL, ALONG WITH THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), PUBLIC COMMENT AND OTHER
INFORMATIONAL SOURCES, SUCH AS APPLE'S FIA,,
THERE IS NO INDEPENDENT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF APPLE,
CAMPUS 2 IN GUPERTINO.
THE TONS OF APPLE'S ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS GENERATED BY
APPLE IN CUPERTINO REPORT BY KEYSER MARSTOlV IS VARY OPTIMISTIC;
HOWEVER,
THE REPORT ME T'I S RECURRING ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX
REVENUES T "LOCAL SCHOOLS". IT FAILS TO MENTION THAT THE
ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FROM PARCEL APIA 31 6m, 770441
THE SITE OF APPLE CAMPUS 2 MAIN IBUILDING, IS NOT
I
ALLOCATED TO CUPERTINO SCHOOL DISTRICTS, CUPERTINO
UNION ELEMENTARY, Y, F UNION HIGH SCHOOL, FOOTHILL,, DE
AI I A COMMUNITY ITY C LLEGE. THis WOULD BE OF INTEREST TO THE
RESIDENTS OF CUPEF TII
Comment: Parcel cel APN 316-07-044, the location of Apple at u
Main Building and Fitness Center in NOT in Cupertino Union,
Fremont Union, and De Anza/Foothill Community College
Districts, As such, these school districts receive no property tax
from this part of Apple Campus 2.
"A. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IS All EXAMINATION F THE REVENUES,
EI UES,
COSTS, AND FISCAL BALANCE (REVENUES MINUS COSTS) ASSOCIATED
WITH PUBLIC AGENCY ACTIVITIES. IT PROVIDES A REASONABLE
LE
PLANNING ,mLEVEL ESTIMATE OF FISCAL IMPACTS,_ USEFUL FDIC
ANTICIPATING WHETHER A. PROJECT WILL PAY ITS OWN WAY GENERATE
SURPLUS REVENUES THAT" CAN BE USED BY A CITY TO IMP D E
SERVICES,- DID GENERATE DEFICITS THAT WILL I'VE UII E A CITY T
DEDUCE SEI IDES' I FIND'DFFSETTING SOURCES OF FU DS.1'
SOURCE: MUNDIE & ASSOCIATES PROPOSAL TO PREPARE E FISCAL IMPACT
ANAL,Y IS OF FACEBOOK CAMPUS IN MENLO PARK FOR THE CITY OF
MENLO PAIL'
JUNE 201 i
A.E HAS EXTENSIVE EXPEDIENCE ASSESSING THE FISCAL IMPACTS
AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PROPOSED NEW DE EL P LENT, AS WELL
AS ASSISTING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO NEGOTIATE FOR COMMUNITY
BENEFITS FROM PROPOSED NEW DE' ELOPMEI T@
THE A[ LYSIS WILL ALSO INCLUDE INFORMATION OIL THE VALUE OF
OTHER POTENTIAL L PUBLIC BENEFITS TO BE PERFORMED...
SOURCE: SAY AREA ECONOMICS PROPOSAL TO PREPARE FISCAL IMPACT
ANALYSIS OF FACEBOOK CAMPUS IN MENLO PARK FOR THE CITY OF
MENLO PACT
JUNE 81201 i
2
.Excerpted from Concerned Citizens of Cupertino Response to the
Draft Environmental Impact Report for Apple Campus Z:
Mitigation: Traffic
Traffic Is Residents' Primary Concern About New Apply Campus
Source: Headline
Cupertino Courier
September 1, 2011
Suggestions:
Predetermine acceptable Traffic level
Decrease Parking Cap
Establish Trip Cap /Trip Cap Penalty
Establish Transportation Management Association
De term in a En viron m en t Imp ct of1mp a cted S ree ts, In tersection s an d
Freeway Segment with regard to Pollution and Economic Loss
"Apple will expand its current Transportation Demand and Cana ear ent I'll program., which
achieves a % reduction in peak hour trips,,.,"
Source: Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project dated April 18, 2012
Comment:
What is baseline number of peak hour trips?
1
"A ple Campus 2 would accommodate approximately 14,200 employees at full occupancy. This
corresponds to an employee density of 4.15 employees per 1,0 .0 .f ....the employee density
proposed at the project site is higher than Industry standards (3.3 employees per 1,000 s.f. and
Apple `s existing campus at the Infinite Loop campus and office south of M r a.ni Avenue in
Cupertino (3.6 employees per 1,000 l.). "
source: Draft Transportation Impact Analysis
By Fehr & Peers
May 31,2013
Page 1
Apple Campus : Added Trip Estimates
"The amount of vehicle traffic that would be added by Campus 2 was estimated by multiplying
the number of employees by the amount of traffic expected to be generated per employee. The
trip rate per employee is based on data collected at Apple's Infinity Loop and M riani campus on
De An a Boulevard in the City of Cupertino. Accounting for traffic already being generated by the
estimated 4,844 employees at the proje ct site in August 2 o 11, the new results are 3 5,10 6 daily
vehicle trips, 3,2 74 AM peals hoar trip (2,890 inbound and 3 84 outbound), and 3 09 9 PM peak
lour trips (796 in bound and 2,303 outbound)."
Source: Draft Transportation. Impact Analysis
by Fehr & Per
May 31, 2013
Page iii
Comments:
Study is based ed o o 11
Hewlett-Packard vacated the property in 2012
Total amounts of traffic woul d more ac urat l r reflect the tr rffic impact of the project.
Restate the sentence: The proposed Apple Campus 2 will-eenerate 50,978 dail
vehicle tri s 4 544 AM 12eak hour trips 953 inbound and 591 outbound and 4
PIS peak hour trips (.LO inbound and 3,65 5 outbound
Source: Draft Transportation Impact Analysis
by Fehr & peers
Fable 8 'trip Generation -Apple Campus 2
Page 40
Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)
Comments:
Impact to freeway segment is lane capacity
Mitigation measures, such as cramp mitigations, do net increase freeway lane capacity
.amp mitigations not under jurisdiction of City of Cupertino
Mitigation measures should address impact on freeway cramps and streets from and to
freeway ramps to minimize queuing, especially Wolfe Road
i`...physical improvements that increase the capacitor of the study freeway segments soul d
potentially mitigate the impacts."
rr... Express Lane programs consist of converting the existing High Occupancy Vehicle la.nes
to high - perfonnance express lanes."
"However, the programs do not increase freeway capacity because no additional lames are
added. Thus, the Express Lane programs will not change the results of the freeway analysis or
serve as direct mitigation of the project impacts."
Source: City of Mountain View
Final Environmental impact Report
Clyde Avenue office Project
Memorandum: Response to 625 --685 Clyde Avenue office Project Draft EIR Written
Comments
Fehr & Peers
January 25, 2013
Page 2
"According to CMP uidefln -e , freeway segments to Which a proposed development is projected to add
3
trips equal to or greater than one percent of the freeway segment's capacity rust be evaluated."
"...capacities of 2,300 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl ) for freeway segments with sic or more lanes and
2,200 vph p] for freeway segments with four lanes were used in the freeway analysis.'°
"Table 8 presents the capacities of each freeway segment and the estimated number of trips added to each
segment by the proposed project."
"The mitigation of freeway impacts is considered beyond the scope of an individual development
project, due to the inability of any individual project or City to acquire right of way for freeway widening.
Freeway improvements also would require approval by Caltrans, which neither the project applicant nor
the City can guarantee. Therefore, the addition of project traic results in a si
ff gnif!cant and unavoid ab le
impact to the identified freeway segments."
Source: City of Mountain view
Graft Transportation impact Analysis
Clyde Avenue Office Project
January 25 , 201
Page 30
"If C altrans does not approve i m P rovem ents with 1n 5 gears f ro m... D eve Iopment Agreement effective date, and the
Applicant demonstrates that it has worked diligently to pursue Caltrans approval to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Director, in his /her sole discretion, then the Applicant shall be relieved of responsibility to construct the
improvement and the bond shall be released by the City after the A ant submits funds equal to the updated
stima ed construction cost to the it The City may use the funds for other transportation. im rovernents ..,"
Source: Conditional Development Permit for Facebook West Campus
City of Menlo Park
March 20, 201
Comment:
Unmed traffic mitiuuation funds should be used by the-Cily0f ertino Lor other
transportation-improvemgnts.
Environmental Review
4
"When a project adds 1 percent more traffic during the peak hour to a freeway segment operating
at LOS F, it is a significant impact under the California Environmental Quality Act FQA ."
'The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Finding that the economic
vitality of the City made the office growth necessary, there were no reasonable mitigations
available to avoid freeway impa ts.'0
Source: City of Mountain View
City Council Meeting
March 1, 013
City Council Report 6.1/625 -685 Clyde Avenue (Samsung)
Agenda Item #6
Establish Trip Cap /Trip Cap Penalty
"The City (of Cupertino) evaluated the feasibility of a mitigation measure requiring a "trip cap."
Under a grip cap, once development of the project sites generates trip volumes that exceed AM and
PM peak-hour values for triggering impacts to the transportation system, continued development
and growth at the project site would be halted,
Source: Apple Campus 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report
June 2013
Page 441
Comment:
Apple Campus 2, Phase 1 would already be completed before Trip Cap Monitoring; it is not
recommended that fipple Campus 2, Phase 2 be halted if Trip Cap exceeded
Instead of halting continued development and growth of the project, establish trip cap
penalty
Development Agreement for Facebook Campus & City of Menlo Park:
Parameter: Trip Cap Penalty: Pursue a grip cap penalty that is severe enough to ensure
compliance with the project description,
5
,_., the trip cap penalty needs to be negotiated. The penalty needs to be severe enough to
ensure compliance with the project description. It i s important to keep in mind that the
penalty is not intended to be a revenue generator.
Source: City of Menlo Park
City Council Meeting
February 14, 2012
Staff Report 1 -029
Agenda Item #F1
(Applicant) believes the proposed penalty (for not achieving the 0% trip reduction by the end
of the six -month grace period) is too high. Staff believes the penalty level is appropriate because
if the penalty i s too lover, it would b e more affordable to pay the penalty than to retain
costly TDM measures, such as the shuttle service,,"
Source: City of Mountain view
City Council Meeting
March 1, 2013
Staff Report #6.1/625-685 Clyde Avenue (Samsung)
Agenda horn
The proposed penalty of /trip /day for not achieving TDM goals is too low to be effective
in enforcing the TDM goals in relationship to the size of the project .... The project should be
conditioned to have a penalty of 10/(trip) /dad' or higher to effectively deter overage of
grips or over intensification of employees.
Source: Response to Draft Environmental Impact Report
City of San Jose
July 22, 2013
Letter ID 50154
Development Agreement for Facebook /EAST Campus &City of Menlo Park
The proposed grip cap includes a maximum of 2,600 trips during the A11 peak period from 7:00
a. m. to 9:00 a.m., 2,600 trips during the PM peak period from :00 p.m. to :00 p.m., and 15,000
daily trips.
...the Project Sponsor has agreed to dollar amounts associated with violations of the trip cap, The
penalty amount would be $50 per trip per day for violations in the AEI peak period, PM peak
period, or daily trips. The penalty would double if the threshold was exceeded in two consecutive
0
months or for four months within any six month period. The penalty would double again if the
threshold was exceeded for six consecutive months.
Vehicles over
Fier
"drip Cap
S /trip
10
$5,000
300
$15,000
Soo
$25,000
Source: City of Menlo Park City
City Council Meeting
April 1, 2012
Staff Report 1 -063
Proposed Apple Campus 2
Vehicles over Tier 1
Trip Cap/ $5 /trip
Peak Trip Count
100 $500
300
o0
$1,500
$2,500
Tier 2
$100 /trip
$10,000
$30,000
$500000
Tier 2
$3 /trip
$300
$900
$1,50D
Tier 3
$200 /trip
$24,000
$%000
$1000000
Comment:, insignificant penaltiesm there does not seem to e a high degree of confidence
In complying with the trip cap.Zpeak trip COUnt.
Development Agreement for Facebook /WEST Campus & City of Menlo Park
The grip Cap specifies the following requirements:
M aximum of 1,100 trips during the AM Peals Period from :oo a.m. to 9:00 a.m.;
Maximum of 11100 trips during the PM Peals Period from :o 0 a.m. to :o
Maximum of 6,350 daily trips.
Source: City of Menlo Park
Planning Commission fleeting
February 25, 2013
Staff Report PC/02-25-13
Comment: tote 2 hour peak Period
EIR Proposed Action if Traffic Demand Management Program is Not Achieved
"The City of Cupertino) would notify apple if one or both of the AM and PM peals hour vehicle
trip counts ....Apple would be required to meet with the City to develop a plan and identify new
TDM measures to be added to achieve the peals trip counts."
Comment:
No time requirement for initial meeting
No consequence if Apple does not meet with the City
Snerio #1
"If Apple does not agree to imp le ent the City- approved TD M me sures, then Apple wo uld
be assessed per day per trip penalty.... Within o days Apple would be required to meet
with the City to reevaluate and identify City- approved new TDM measures to be implemented at
the project site. This cycle would continue until Apple agrees to implement City - approved
TDM measures."
Comment:
"Within 60 days" of ?
Uuntil Apple agrees to implement City - approved TDM measures"
Senerio #2
"Once Apple and the City agree on new TDM measures, Apple would implement these within 60
days of the notification date, ...60 days after the new measures are i plemented...evaluate the
effectiveness of the new TDM. plan."
0
"If the peals trips counts are still exceeded, ,Apple would pay a fee of per day per extra vehicle
trip shorn in the peak trip counts...."
"After three months, Apple would be required to meet with the City to identify City additional
approved new TDM measures to be added."
"If Apple still is not meeting the goal during the next annual monitoring period, penalties would
be continued to be levied until the peak trips counts goal is et.p�
Source: Apple Campus 2 Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
June 2012
Page 445
Comment:
Long process allowing continued traffic congestion
No incentive to address traffic congestion
Insignificant penalty of or per day vehicle clay penalty
Suggestions:
Increase peak period from I hour to hour
Establish 60 day grace period monitoring after occupancy of significant ° of project
Set time limit for initial City of Cupertino /Apple meeting to actually occur; as well as
well subsequent meetings
Institute significant p enalty after 6 0-day grace period
Increase penalty if goals -of traffic demand management is not achieved
Development Agreement for Samsung Site &City of Mountain View
"The applicant has agreed to recluse peals hour* trips by 20 percent...,"
" six -mon-th grace period is proposed that allows the applicant to adjust the "ADM measures to
meet the 20 percent requirement."
9
"If the 20 percent trip reduction is not achieved by the end of the six -month grace period, the
applicant shall be fined a penalty of $ 10 Oo 0 0 0 for the first I percent below the 20 percent
threshold, then $50,000 for each additional percent below the 2 0 percent threshold."
"(The applicant) believes the proposed penalty is too high. Staff believes the penalty level is
appropriate because if the penalty is too low, it would be more affordable to pair the penalty
than to retain costly TIM measures, such as the shuttle service."
Source; City of Mountain View
City Council Meeting
March 19, 2 01
City Council Deport 6.1/625-685 Clyde Avenue (Samsung)
Page 9
Agenda item #6
Peak Hour Trip Deduction
Penalty Amount
20%
0
19%
$x.00,000
18%
$150,000
17%
$200,000
16%
$250,000
1 °
$300oOOO
i I F f! P No
20 s $1000;000 Yh W 1 Y 4IIN A N ■ .. r■
The TDM penalty shall be paid to the TINA. and used to promote alternatives to single-occupancy
vehicle use in the City. (PROJECT-SPECIFIC CONDITION)
Source: City of Mountain View
Findings Report Zoning Permit for Application 113-12-R (Samsung)
April 26,2013
Page 6
Comments:
Apple Campus
Peak Hours Trip Deduction Penalty Amount
°D
10
% not specified
except for
per vehicle day
Insignificant penafty,
See previous comment
Establish Transportation Management Association
Mountain View
"Still, Mountain in ' i 's city council has sounded a tougher line on several new office projects of late,
including proposals from Goggle Inc..., citing traffic concerns."
Source: Next Up:
by Nathan Donato-Weinstein
Silicon Valley Business journal
March 8, 2013
Page 1
"The (Mountain View) council seemed supportive of other strategies contained in a recently
completed transportation study for the area (North Bayshore ). Those ideas include a
transportation management association to spearhead a development of multi-employer transit
system, boosting bile commuting, and improving roadway efficiency, among others."
Source: oogle's Transit Bridge Caught in Conflict
by Nathan Donato - Weinstein
Silicon Valley Business Journal
March 29,2013
Page 11
"The applicant has agreed to reduce peals hour trips by 20 percent and has submitted a TA M
progra n....The notable addition to the T M is a shuttle service for employees and the public
(TMA)..,.The estimated annual cost of the shuttle is $100,000 to oo,000,Y)
1
'(The applicant) estimates that the set -up cost for the T iA would be 0,0 0O....A.lso, any
penalties related to enforcement of the 2 0 percent trip reduction requirement would be payable to
the T IA, which the TMA can then use to further promote alternatives to single- occupancy vehicle
use in the area'
Source: City of Mountain Vier
City Council Meeting
March 19, 2013
City Council Report/625-68S Clyde Avenue (Samsung)
Page 9 x.12
,Agenda Item #6
Nonprofit Transportation Management Association for Samsung (condition of approval), Goggle
(proposed) and San Antonio Shopping Mall (proposed).
Source: City of Mountain View
r
City Council Meeting
March 19, 2013
City Council Report 6.1/625-685 Clyde Avenue (Samsung)
Attachment : Traffic Demand Management T Summary 2/26/13 and Update
3/16/13
Attachment : Mountain View Transportation Management Association Summary
Proposal
Agenda Item #6
Stanford
Marguerite shuttle is a free shuttle service Stanford [University offers to its students, faculty,
staff, and the general public. All routes on the system are free and open to the public. Currently,
14 lines run through the campus and provide free transportation to the two Palo Alto CalTrain
stations, Stanford Linear Accelerator SLA, Stanford Shopping Center, and the Sari Antonio
Shopping Center.
Source: 1Tiipedia
1
Emeryville
Emery Go-Round shuttle is a free private transportation service, open to all Emeryville
residents, shoppers, visitors and employees of Emeryville businesses, provided by Emeryville
businesses.
Emery Go-Round is a service of the Emeryville Transportation Management Association,
non - profit organization whose primary purpose is to increase access and mobility to, from and
within Emeryville while alleviating congestion through operation of the shuttle program.
TM
IKEA
Nov rti
PirAnimation Studios
Source: Emery Go-Round Website, www.emerygoround.com
MITIGATION MEASURE
"HOWEVER, THE ON, A P ) OFF,RAMP INTERSECTION ERSECTI N I [ENDER CALTI ANS
JURISDICTION. THEREFORE, NEITHER THE PROJECT SPONSOR I THE CITY OF
CUPE TINO CAN ENSURE THE: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION
MEASURES; THUS THE IMPACT IS CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE. S
SOURCE APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT DRAFT EN II DI I rHTAL IMPACT REPORT
JUNE 20 12
PAGE 394
"IF CALTRANS DOES NOT APPROVE: I: IMP OV MENT WITHIN 5 YEARS
FROM.. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE, AND THE APPLICANT
DEMONSTRATES ATE THAT IT HAS WORKED DILIGENTLY TO PURSUE CALTRANS APPROVAL
TO THE~ SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORK WORKs DIRECTOR, , I ! HIS/HER DL„E
DISCRETION, THEN THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RELIEVED OF RESPONSIBILITY TO
CONSTRUCT THE IMPROVEMENT T A ND THE B ND SHALL BE RELEASED BY THE CITY
AFTER THI~ APPLICANT SUBMITS FUNDS EQUAL To THE UPDATED ESTIMATED
CONSTRUCTION COST TO THE CITY. THE CITY MAY USE THE FUNDS FOR OTHER
IE
TRANSPORTATION TA'T`IOICI IMPROVEMENTS,...�9
SOURCE: CONDITIONAL DE EL PMENT PERMIT FOR FACCE300K WEST CAMPUS
CITY of MENLO PARK
1
MARCH 20, 2013
1
Mitigation: Housing
City of Cupertino General Plan
Housing Element 2007-2014
Program 10: Jobs /Housing Balance Program
Require major new office /industrial development to build housing as part of new
development projects. As part of the development review process, the City will
evaluate the impact of any application that will produce additional jobs in the
community. The purpose of the evaluation is to describe the impacts of the new jobs
on the City's housing stock, especially in relation to the jobs/housing ratio in the City.
City of Palo Alto /Stanford Hospital & Clinics/Lucille Packard Children's Hospita
Stanford proposal includes a $23,1 million contribution to Pala .Alto's affordable housing
plan. Stanford's vice president for Special Projects said the amount is equivalent to ghat a for -
profit developer would have to pay....the hospital is exempt from the housing fee, but is willing to
pay it a nyway to help mitigate the project's impaets....the. hospital aren't offering to build the
houses because they don't own the land were these houses would have to stand."
Source: Stanford offers $125 Million in `Community Benefits' for Hospital Expansion
By Gennady Seynr
Palo Alto online
June 16, 2009
In exchange for approving the project, Palo Alto negotiated a development agreement that
includes nearly $1"75 million in "community benefits' to be provided by ta.n ord,...ab ut $23.2
million for the city to use on housing projects.
Source: Council Olds Stanford Hospital Expansion
By Diana. Samuels
San Pose Mercury Nevis
June 8, 2 011
1
City of Menlo Park /Facebook West Campus
The company is seeping a development agreement that would spell out its long -terry
development rights in exchange for public benefits. Fa c eb o o k wo uld also pay approximately $4.
million to the it r" below-market rate housing fund#
Source: More Details Emerge on Facebook's West Campus Design
By Nathan Donato - Weinstein
Silicon' alley Business Journal
September 2 8, 2012
Page 10
City of Cupertino /Apple
r'...a $2.5 million contribution to affordable lousing, the report said."
Source: Apple Plans to Add 'thousands of Jobs
by Peter Burrows of Bloomberg
San Francisco Chronicle
June 6, 2013
"...payment of a $2. 5 million Bel ow Marl et Rate (B MR) affordable housing fee. Apple will be
making an additional voluntary $2.5 million contribution to the City's BMR program as part of its
investment in public improvements and benefits.,
Source: Economic and Fiscal Impacts Generated by Apple in Cupertino
by Keyser Marston Associates
Prepared for Apple
May 201
Page 1
Footnote 20
Comment: Stanford billion project million for affordable housing
aceb o k West C amp u project > $4,5 million for bel ow- market rate housing
Apple Campus to 5 billion project .o million for affordable housing
2
Community Benefits
As condition of approval to project
'While Stanford estimates its benefits package to total about $173 million, the City values the
proposed benefits at about o million. The main difference is Stanford's assertion that the Go
Passes constitutes public benefits, while the City maintains that they are mitigations required
by state law.,
Bounce: Stanford Hospital Expansion Sails Toward Finish Line
By Gennady Shener
Palo Alto Weekly
May 20, 2011
"While Stanford values the "community benefits" package at about $1'73 million, the City sags it #s
closer to $43 million. Palo Alto officials argue that marry of the benefits in the Stanford proposal,
including the Caltrain passes, are mitigations that hospitals are required t provide to get
environmental clearance for the project.
Source: Stanford Hospital Expansion Up for Final Vote
By Gennady She nor{
Palo alto Times
Jung z, 2011
Comments: What are the mitigations required by state law for Apple to provide to get
environmental clearance for the project,
Updated Excerpt from Concerned Citizens of Cupertino Response to
the Draft Environmental impact Report for Apple Campus 2:
Community Benefits Provided by Other Companies
NOT as a condition of approval to any project
* In August 2006 Goggle provide free wireless int rn t WiFi network in Mountain View. r. Goggle
"This network is a way for us to give back to and engage with the community where our
headquarter is.. ..it has been tremendously regarding to partner with the local government, the
schools, the library, the neighborhood associations...to introduce the power of free, wireless
Internet to the City." In addition to providing no cost WiFi service in the City, the agreement w
Goggle calls for Goggle to pay the City an annual fee for use of the City's streetlight poles and equip
the City's mobile library services w,ith mobile wireless equipment.
Source: City of Mountain Vier
In June 2011 Goggle gives $ 1 million to the local elementary and middle schools, the Mountain
tain
View Whisman school District.
November 11, 2011 Goggle invests in affordable housing in Mountain view, the $23.5 million
Franklin Street Family Apartments, a 1 -unit rental development.
Source: Goggle Invest in Home Project
By Hike Swift
San Jose Mercury News
December 7, 2011
On June 14, 2012 Goggle announced that it will donate $1 million to the Mountain vie
Whisman School District. It's the second such grant that Goggle has given to the district.
Asked whether Goggle expected anything in return for its heaver investment in the district, the
Manager of Community Affairs for Goggle, stated that the "company is hoping to hire talented
individuals from its own backyard in gears to come, and that investing in local education is a
surefire way of ensuring the company can do just tha.t....we want to continue supporting our
hometown schools and ensure all students in Mountain view are getting a strong education."
Source; Goggle Donates $1 Million to Local Schools
By Nick veronin
Voice of Mountain view
June 15, 2012
n June 4r, 2013 Pace ook " has pledged as much as $215,000 to overhaul a storefront in
Belle Haven Center at Hamilton Avenue and Willow Road and to cover 75 percent of the rent until
June 2016, according to a copy of an agreement presented to the Council. If
Source: Facebook to Delp Fund New Police Substation
By Bonnie Eslinger
San Jose Mercury News
June 7, 2013
City of Menlo Park City Council Meeting June 4, 2013
Agenda Item #F-3
City Manager Deport 1 -091
slew of upgrades around town for bicyclist and pedestrians are in the newly approved city
budget, thanks to the efforts of activists and a little funding from Goggle.
The City's 2013-14 budget, approved last month, includes a long list of upgrades around town
for those on foot and on like, paid in part with $43 5,0 0 0 from Goggle....
In a letter about the offer, Goggle real estate chief David Radcliffe said he was "delighted" the
city had made such things a top priority this year and offered he city $500,0 0 o towards the
cause,...
The Google projects include $50,000 for solely needed downtown bike rack, $150,000 to help
extend the Permanente Permanent Creek Trail to Middlefield Road and $160,000 to wards creating a new
bicycle transportation plan for the city...."
Goggle also agreed to donate $7S,000 to add flashing lights to three cro swalkson Shoreline
Boulevard near downtown,...
"We're proud to call Mountain view home and are thrilled to work with the city to promote
a more walkable and bile- friendly ommunity, "Radcliffe said in an email.
...and there's Mill $65,000 in Goggle money that has yet to be spent on bile and pedestrian
improvements.
Source: Mountain vier voice
by Daniel lebolt
July 5, 2013
Page 1
Goggle and a San Francisco supervisor announced a partnership Wednesday to bring free i -Fi
to 31 San Francisco parks, plazas and open spaces.
The Internet giant has agreed to provide a $600,000 grant to fund the initiative
Source: Google to Provide i -F1 in S.F. Parrs
Associated Press
San Jose Mercury News
July 25, 2013
Page B8
Karen B. Guerin
From: DOLF PAYED [dolfpa rer @sb glo al.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 5:42 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple 2 Campus
Core on you guy's al's,,.. -Sign -off on this cam pus.... I 1n full support of this Com pany., Wh r take so long,
Bead me you schedule for sign off....This is important to both you and I ... Go Team... is high,.0 olf
Caren B. Guerin
From: Shankar T [ ankart yahoo. omJ
Sent: Tuesday, October o1, 2013 9.15 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Support for Apple Carpus
Folks,
Myself and my family lives in 3876 Baldwin Drive, Santa Clara. And our family support for this campus 2
Kumar, Stith a & Parthi
Karen B, Guerin
From: Nancy Nei al [nancyneibel@aftnetl
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:17 AM
T: City Council
Subject: Apple Carpus 2
We support the Apple Campus 2 Development.
Claudio Hunger & Nancy Neibel
Karen B. Guerin
From: Fan, Ching [ hing.f n@ rne. om]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 201 9;22 AM
To: City Council
Subject: I support the apple campus and we should expedite the process to make it happen - from the
euprtino resident.
Karen . Guerin
From: CJRE [cjr 888@g mail.com)
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:24 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple's new building
I have lived in Cupertino for the past 23 years and my children grew up in the public school system. Our
schools are great today in past for the continued support in education that we received From Apple.
In the early 90s, when I was a room mom, I had a survey to find out how many lids had computers in their
homes, When I asked the lids if they have computer at home, none raised their hand, When I asked if they
have Apple, practically over everyone raised their hands.
This is how much positive impact Apple has had and continues to do so in our community. We are blessed to
have them and should be welcome with open arms. Many cities would die to have Apple, in this backyard.
Sincerely,
U Joeson
408-490-1754
Karen B, Guerin
From: Brad Meyer [cup rtine_ fly r@yahoo,com]
Sent: Tuesday, October '1, 2013 9:28 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple 2 Campus Support
Hello Cupertino City Council,
As a long term resident of Cupertino and of Loree Estates 7 want to repeat my full support of the proposed
Apple 2 Campus slated to begin construction soon. Having Apple as the largest employer in Cupertino is
essential to the continued way of life here and It continues to promote the identity f Cupertino as a world-class
technology center.
I live on Judy Ave here in Loree Estates and I had some concerns at the beginning of the project but most, if not
ail, of them have been mitigated with the EIR that was produced. This project has taken into account the
concerns of a very wide audience and Apple has done a stellar job in addressing as many as possible.
I see this project improving the way of life in Cupertino, raising property values in Cupertino, maintaining the
high quality of our schools in Cupertino, and increasing the image of Cupertino as a great place to live in the
San Francisco Bay Area..
All the hest,
Brad Meyer
Judy Ave.
Cupertino
Karen B. Guerin
From: Jun Nishimura / +T ift — Dun nishi ur @rn . r ]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 201 9:40 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Supporting Apple in Cupertino
To whom It may concern
Dear sirs/ladies:
I fully support Apple Campus 2 in Cupertino to be approved as soon as possible.
I feel proud of having Apple since its birth and everyone must be sure that the company has
supported the city of Cupertino. Apple and Cupertino should go hand in hand.
Sincerely,
Jun Nishimura
Cupertino resident for 13 years
I
Karen B. Guerin
From: ru sh! f aru hi@a gmail. orn]
Sent; Tuesday, October 01, 201 9:32 1M
T City Council
Subject: Apple campus
Dear Sir.,
I just wanted to say that as a resident f Cupertino, Z am excited about the upcoming Apple
Campus. It looks like a very elegant building and a visual. treat.
7 really hope that the city will support this campus as I think it will put us o-F the world
map.
Thank you.
Artiushi Gehani
Ramona Ct
Cupertino CA 95014
Sent from my iPad
I
Karen B. Guerin
From- Clancy Gabriel [ yrenindi o@a yahoo. omJ
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9,41 AEI
T: City Council
Subject: 1 support the Apple Carpus 11
T would like to voice my support for Apple's new campus. T think Apple has been and will be
good for Cupertino. I'm grateful that our City Council and the Permits and Traffic
departments are all working with Apple in all the issues that need to be resolved.
Thank you,
Nancy Gabriel.
1496 Rose Garden Lane
Cupertino
1
Caren B. Guerin
From: sfarella@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 201 9:53 AM
T: City Council
Subject: APPLE
I support the Apple 2 Campus, Everything i read about the campus 2 has been positive. Many benefits to the Community,
respecting the past and planning for the future. Let's begin building now..A now.. great asset to the city of Cupertino.
chuck arlla resident of Cupertino for 40 }rears.
Karen B. Guerin
From: Char Marshall [ harr. marsh ll2 @g ail. om]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10:09 All
To: City Council
I support the Apple plan. But I de Irish that they would make certain parts of their campus more open, such as the
grounds and perhaps restaurants /cafeteria,
Char Marshall
Cupertino Citizen
Caren B. Guerin
From: Uparkar Bhushan [bhushan_u parka r @yahoo, corn]
Sent: Tuesday, October o1, 201 1 0:14 AM
T: City Council
Subject: Support for apple campus
Hallo,
This is Bhushan Uparkar r resident of Cupertino city. I like to nor my support to Apple new campus in Cupertino.
Sincerely,
Bhushan Upark r
939 Dose blossom dr, Cupertino, CW01
Karen B. Guerin
From: Judy Gaffney Uud mgaffn y@gm il, orn]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10:17 A
T: City Council
Subject: Apple
Please pass the permit mit for the Apple campus. Apple is important to our city and residents.
Thank you.
J.G.
1
Karen B. Guerin
From: Jason Tsai Uengt i @m n. mI
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 201 10-19 A
To: City Council
Subject: Apple Campus
Dear City Council Members,
,
We would life to continue our supports on Apple ne w campus as it will provide continued and long terra
growth for our local community. As the most recognized brand rant #1 in the world, it will continue to
attract many talented people from various backgrounds ground into our community. These high paring jobs will
provide needed tax revenue that support Ivey city and neighbor services. My wife and I would life to continue
our supports on the new Apple carpus.
Best regards,
Jena --Hiun Tsai & IIi -L! Ia
7636 Elderwood Ct
Cupertino, CA 95014
Karen B. Guerin
From: Christie L Fran e C hri tie,lafr n e @gmail. omJ
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10.24 AID
T: City Council
Subject: support for Apple Campus
Dear City Council,
We strongly support the Apple camp2. we bell
10�113
Karen B. Guerin
From: Willow Hopkins [ illo Ord nhopkins@gr il.eom]
Sent; Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10.27 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple Carpus
To: The City Council Planning Commission Study Session,
My family and I have been party of the community since 1976 and owned our home at 6365 Candlewood Court
and love being here. I look on the prospect of having ,Apple Campus in our community 1s an opportunity for this
city that is rare. We should support having them approved to build and stay with us. Apple has already put
Cupertino on the snap through out the world.
Willow Hopkins in 408- 691 --7426
Caren B. Guerin
From: Lana [Ianaj ert @ rn ast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10:41 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Apple complex
am in full support of the Apple project and am proud to have them in our community. It appears to be a well thought out
holistic plan,
Karen B. Guerin
From: Naeern Zafar [na m bitz,ormobil . m]
Serf; Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1 1;49 AM
To: City Council
Subject: support for Apple Campus project
I am a Cupertino resident (18416 Chelmsford Drive Cupertino) and want to express ray strong support for the project,
It was expand the tax base, be good for the house pricing and please approve the project
n
Naeem War I President & CEO 1408-218-1920 1 naeem @blt ermobilo.corn JTwitter @naeem I skype nz 0 O I www,Bitz r M b'ile.com
Karen B. Guerin
From: David Li [dli d]j@ h . m]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:08 PI S
To: City Council
I fully support the building of Apple's Campus 2 in Cupertino.
Karen B. Guerin
From: Gopakumar Pill i [h p kurn r@a h trn il. om]
Sent: Monday. September 30, 201 ;13 P
To: City Council
Subject: Support for Apple Campus
T o whomsoever it may concern:
I any a resident of Cupertino and I extend nay full support for Apple Campus 2.
palurnrPillai
8129 Park Villa Circle,
Cupertino, CA 95014
408- 257 -6630
Karen B. Guerin
From: henry zoellner [ h nri@a i loud. m]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7;29 PIS
T: City Council
Subject: Support. , , ... ,yes
Cupertino CC
We in the Westwood Oalcs homeowner's tract support
the AAPL Campus II...
However, it means a major traffic pain to us. We would
be mollified if Cupertino would annex Westwood Oall,,;,-s
into Cupertino. We are Santa Clara orphans and are
burdened with the hated stadium. We stick into the
Cupertino borders convenientl, as does Agi
y lent and
Kaiser. More tax base.
Henry Zoellner
I