Loading...
02-18-14 Searchable packetTable of Contents Agenda 3 Proclamation to Joshua Robinson recognizing his achievement of earning Eagle Scout No written materials 8 Proclamation celebrating the 35th Anniversary of the Toyokawa, Japan and Cupertino, USA Sister City relationship - postponed from December 17 No written materials 9 Proclamation to the Toyokawa Sister City Committee - postponed from December 17 No written materials 10 Presentation of Lunar New Year posters from the Hsinchu Sister City Committee No written materials 11 Housing Commission annual update No written materials 12 Approve the February 4 City Council minutes A - Draft Minutes 13 Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 17, 2014 A - Draft Resolution 18 Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 24, 2014 A - Draft Resolution 35 Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 31, 2014 A - Draft Resolution 47 Consider updates to the City's Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities and International Delegate policy Staff Report 57 A - Sister City Policy redline version 59 B - Sister Cities study 64 Approval of an agreement for consultant services for the Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan Staff Report 67 Professional Plan Check Services for the Apple Campus 2 corporate auditorium project Staff Report 70 A - Draft Contract 71 Purchase and Lease After Sale of Property Staff Report 114 A - Draft Resolution 116 B - Map 118 C - Purchase Agreement 119 City Project, 2013 Pavement Maintenance Phase 1, Project No. 2013-01 Staff Report 139 1 A - 2013 Pavement Maintenance Phase 1 Street List 140 2 AGENDA    CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING  10350 Torre Avenue, Community Hall Council Chamber  Tuesday, February 18, 2014  6:45 PM    CITY COUNCIL MEETING    PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE     ROLL CALL     CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS    1. Subject:  Proclamation to Joshua Robinson recognizing his achievement of earning  Eagle Scout    Recommended Action:  Present proclamation     No written materials  Page: No written materials in packet  2. Subject:  Proclamation celebrating the 35th Anniversary of the Toyokawa, Japan and  Cupertino, USA Sister City relationship ‐ postponed from December 17    Recommended Action:  Present proclamation     No written materials  Page: No written materials in packet  3. Subject:  Proclamation to the Toyokawa Sister City Committee ‐ postponed from  December 17    Recommended Action:  Present proclamation     No written materials  Page: No written materials in packet      3 Tuesday, February 18, 2014  Cupertino City Council   4. Subject:  Presentation of Lunar New Year posters from the Hsinchu Sister City  Committee    Recommended Action:  Receive the presentation     No written materials  Page: No written materials in packet  5. Subject:  Housing Commission annual update    Recommended Action:  Receive presentation     No written materials  Page: No written materials in packet  POSTPONEMENTS    ORAL COMMUNICATIONS    This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on  any matter not on the agenda.  Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases,  State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter  not listed on the agenda.     CONSENT CALENDAR    Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a  member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on  simultaneously.    6. Subject:  Approve the February 4 City Council minutes    Recommended Action:  Approve the minutes     A ‐ Draft Minutes  Page: 13  7. Subject:  Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 17, 2014    Recommended Action:  Adopt Resolution No. 14‐117 accepting Accounts Payable  for period ending January 17, 2014     A ‐ Draft Resolution  Page: 18        4 Tuesday, February 18, 2014  Cupertino City Council   8. Subject:  Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 24, 2014    Recommended Action:  Adopt Resolution No. 14‐118 accepting Accounts Payable  for period ending January 24, 2014     A ‐ Draft Resolution  Page: 35  9. Subject:  Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 31, 2014    Recommended Action:  Adopt Resolution No. 14‐119 to accept Accounts Payable for  period ending January 31, 2014     A ‐ Draft Resolution  Page: 47  10. Subject:  Consider updates to the Cityʹs Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities and  International Delegate policy    Recommended Action:  Approve recommended updates to the Cityʹs Policies and  Guidelines on Sister Cities and International Delegate policy     Staff Report  A ‐ Sister City Policy redline version  B ‐ Sister Cities study  Page: 57  11. Subject:  Approval of an agreement for consultant services for the Stevens Creek  Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan    Recommended Action:  Staff recommends that the City Council approve the  following: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a consultant agreement with  MIG to provide services to the City that will result in a comprehensive master plan  for the corridor and associated Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), for an amount  not to exceed $425,000; and 2. Appropriate an additional $180,000 to provide for the  expanded EIR cost and alternatives ($150,000) and noticing, meetings and supplies  ($30,000), for a total budget not to exceed $480,000; and 3. Authorize the City  Manager to approve Contact Change Orders (CCO) for Items 1 and 2 above to the  extent that total expenditures do not exceed the total amount of the project budget     Staff Report  Page: 67        5 Tuesday, February 18, 2014  Cupertino City Council   12. Subject:  Professional Plan Check Services for the Apple Campus 2 corporate  auditorium project    Recommended Action:  Authorize the City manager to execute a Professional  Services Agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc. to provide plan check services for  the Apple Campus 2 corporate auditorium in the amount of $421,580     Staff Report   A ‐ Draft Contract  Page: 70  13. Subject:  Purchase and Lease After Sale of Property    Recommended Action:  Adopt Resolution No. 14‐120 approving the purchase and  lease after sale of property at 22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard (APN 357‐10‐002) from  George and Yoshiko Blesch, in the amount of $1,575,000, authorizing the City  Manager to execute all necessary documents to complete the acquisition and the  lease agreement     Staff Report  A ‐ Draft Resolution  B ‐ Map  C ‐ Purchase Agreement  Page: 114  14. Subject:  City Project, 2013 Pavement Maintenance Phase 1, Project No. 2013‐01    Recommended Action:  Accept Project No. 2013‐01     Staff Report  A ‐ 2013 Pavement Maintenance Phase 1 Street List  Page: 139  SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES    PUBLIC HEARINGS    ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS    REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF    ADJOURNMENT            6 Tuesday, February 18, 2014  Cupertino City Council         The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation  challenging a final decision of the City Council must be brought within 90 days after a decision is  announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law.    Prior to seeking judicial review of any adjudicatory (quasi‐judicial) decision, interested persons must  file a petition for reconsideration within ten calendar days of the date the City Clerk mails notice of the  City’s decision. Reconsideration petitions must comply with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal  Code §2.08.096. Contact the City Clerk’s office for more information or go to  http://www.cupertino.org/index.aspx?page=125 for a reconsideration petition form.     In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make  reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities.  If you require special assistance,  please contact the city clerk’s office at 408‐777‐3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.    Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of  the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall,  10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the  agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. 7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014    Subject:  Proclamation to Joshua Robinson recognizing his achievement of earning  Eagle Scout  NO WRITTEN MATERIALS IN PACKET      8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014    Subject:  Proclamation celebrating the 35th Anniversary of the Toyokawa, Japan  and Cupertino, USA Sister City relationship ‐ postponed from December 17    NO WRITTEN MATERIALS IN PACKET      9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014    Subject:  Proclamation to the Toyokawa Sister City Committee ‐ postponed from  December 17    NO WRITTEN MATERIALS IN PACKET      10 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014    Subject:  Presentation of Lunar New Year posters from the Hsinchu Sister City  Committee    NO WRITTEN MATERIALS IN PACKET      11 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014    Subject:  Housing Commission annual update.      NO WRITTEN MATERIALS IN PACKET      12 Amended on January 30  to add item no. 1A DRAFT MINUTES  CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL  Special Meeting    Tuesday, February 4, 2014     CITY COUNCIL MEETING    ROLL CALL  At 5:56 p.m. Mayor Gilbert Wong called the City Council meeting to order in the City  Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA.    Present:  Mayor Gilbert Wong, Vice Mayor Rod Sinks, and Council members Barry  Chang, and Mark Santoro. Absent: Orrin Mahoney.       CLOSED SESSION    Written Communications for this item included a handout from Mary Robertson with  information regarding the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA’s) State  Route (SR) 85 Express Lanes Project.     The following individuals spoke under this item:     Mary Robertson said that VTA’s project description and the Highway Constrained  Project List talked about converting but not adding more High Occupancy Toll (HOT)  lanes and she had concerns with the proposed negative declaration and adequate public  notice.  She added that there was no formal presentation from the VTA or Caltrans and  asked Council to ask for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).    Donna Poppenhagen said she was concerned about lights shining into backyards and  noise levels in the corridor, the mitigation of traffic near schools and on SR 85, and she  asked Council to ask for an EIR.      John Chen said he had concerns about air quality due to the increased congestion and  said that the HOT lanes will postpone the problem but it will come back. He also said  that he supports a south/north extension verses a north/south extension.  13 Tuesday, February 4, 2014  Cupertino City Council     1A. Subject:  Conference with Legal Counsel – Initiation of litigation pursuant to  subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9:  One Case    At 5:56 p.m. Council recessed to a closed session, and reconvened in open session at  6:54 p.m. in the Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino,  CA. Mayor Wong announced that Council met in closed session, obtained a briefing  from legal counsel and gave direction.     PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  At 6:54 p.m. Mayor Gilbert Wong reconvened the City Council meeting in the  Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA and led the  Pledge of Allegiance.    ROLL CALL    Present:  Mayor Gilbert Wong, Vice Mayor Rod Sinks, and Council members Barry  Chang, and Mark Santoro. Absent: Orrin Mahoney.         CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS    1. Subject:  Proclamation recognizing the Cupertino Library Foundationʹs 20th  Anniversary    Recommended Action:  Present proclamation       Mayor Wong presented the proclamation to the Cupertino Library Foundation  members, Eno Schmidt and Donna Austin.    2.  Subject:  Presentation from the Silicon Valley Leadership Group recognizing the City  of Cupertinoʹs participation in the 1st Annual Red Tape to Red Carpet Awards    Recommended Action:  Receive presentation       Silicon Valley Leadership Group Energy Leader Tim McCray presented a certificate  of achievement plaque to Mayor Wong awarding the City in the category of  Business Retention and Expansion. Council received the presentation.    3.   Subject:  Parks & Recreation Commission annual update    Recommended Action:  Receive update      Written Communications for this item included a PowerPoint presentation.   14 Tuesday, February 4, 2014  Cupertino City Council     Parks and Recreation Commission Chair David Fung, Vice Chair Darcy Paul, and  Commissioners Geoff Paulsen, Neesha Tambe, and Judy Wilson reviewed the Work  Plan for Fiscal Year 2013‐14 via a PowerPoint presentation highlighting the  Commission charter, process, notable items for 2013‐2014, activities since July 2013,  and upcoming activities. Council received the update.    POSTPONEMENTS ‐ None    ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ‐ None    Tim Widman, Cupertino Chamber of Commerce Board Member and Legislative Action  Committee Vice President thanked the City for partnering with them on the Social  Media workshop on January 24, the State of City Address and General Plan  Amendment Chamber exercise on January 29. He invited Council to the upcoming  Lunar New Year luncheon at Dynasty Restaurant on February 14, the STAR awards at  the Cypress Hotel on March 22, and the Taste of Cupertino at Vallco on April 12.   CONSENT CALENDAR    Sinks moved and Chang seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar. Sinks  noted that he would recuse himself from voting on item number 9. Ayes: Chang,  Santoro, Sinks, and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Mahoney. Recuse: Sinks  recused on item number 9.    4.   Subject:  Approve the January 21 City Council minutes    Recommended Action:  Approve the minutes       5.   Subject:  Approve the January 27 City Council minutes    Recommended Action:  Approve the minutes       6.   Subject:  Accept Accounts Payable for period ending November 22, 2013    Recommended Action:  Adopt Resolution No. 14‐115 accepting Accounts Payable  for period ending November 22, 2013       7.   Subject:  Accept Accounts Payable for period ending January 10, 2014    Recommended Action:  Adopt Resolution No. 14‐116 accepting Accounts Payable  for period ending January 10, 2014          15 Tuesday, February 4, 2014  Cupertino City Council   8.  Subject:  Confirmation of Planning Commission representative to the Environmental  Review Committee (ERC)    Recommended Action:  Appoint Planning Commission representative to the  Environmental Review Committee       9.  Subject:  Professional Plan Check Services for the Apple Campus 2 parking garage  project    Recommended Action:  Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional  Services Agreement with 4Leaf, Inc. to provide plan check services for the Apple  Campus 2 main parking garage in the amount of $374,744       Council member Sinks recused himself from voting on this item.    SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES    10. Subject:  Second reading of the Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam Food Service  Ware Ordinance    Recommended Action:  Conduct the second reading and enact Ordinance No. 14‐ 2116: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending Title 9  of the Cupertino Municipal Code to add Chapter 9.15 to prohibit the use of  polystyrene foam disposable food service ware by food vendorsʺ       Director of Public Works Timm Borden reviewed the staff report.    Chang moved and Santoro seconded to read Ordinance No. 14‐2116 by title only  and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes:  Chang, Santoro, and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Mahoney.    Chang moved and Santoro seconded to enact Ordinance No. 14‐2116. Ayes: Chang,  Santoro, and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Mahoney.    PUBLIC HEARINGS – None    ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS – None    REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF    11. Subject:  Public Works Construction Project Updates    Recommended Action:  Present Construction Project Update Report       16 Tuesday, February 4, 2014  Cupertino City Council   Director of Public Works Timm Borden reviewed the construction project via a  PowerPoint presentation. Council received the report.     City Manager David Brandt said that the Santa Clara County Superior Court is  recruiting volunteers to serve on the Civil Grand Jury. Information is available from  the Superior Court website at www.scscourt.org.     Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various  community events.     ADJOURNMENT    At 7:39 p.m., Mayor Wong adjourned the meeting.      _______________________________   Kirsten Squarcia, Deputy City Clerk    Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the City Council meeting are  available for review at the City Clerk’s Office, 777‐3223, and also on the Internet at  www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click on the appropriate Packet.    Most Council meetings are shown live on Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U‐verse  Channel 99 and are available at your convenience at www.cupertino.org. Click on  Agendas & Minutes, then click Archived Webcast.  Videotapes are available at the  Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777‐2364.          17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3227 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014      Subject  Consider updates to the City’s Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities and International  Delegates policy.    Recommended Action  Approve recommended updates to the City’s Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities and  International Delegates policy.    Discussion  At the November 5, 2013 City Council meeting, staff was asked to report back to  Council regarding our Sister City/International Delegation policy and to survey other  cities as to their commitment levels in this area.    Background  Cupertino has four active sister cities registered with Sister City International, the cities  of Toyokawa, Japan, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Copertino, Italy and Bhubaneswar, India.  Two  of those cities, Toyokawa and Hsinchu operate student exchange programs and are  registered 501C(3) non‐profit entities.      Staff modified our current policy (Attachment A) to reflect existing practices, clarify  responsibilities between the City and the non‐for‐profit agencies and reflect inter‐ department responsibilities given the City’s recent re‐organizations.  In addition, staff  surveyed the cities in Santa Clara County (SCC) as to their level of involvement in Sister  City/International delegation activities (Attachment B).  Our survey found that five of  the fifteen SCC cities interact with Sister City programs.  Amounts of their budget and  staff time vary.    Finally, while total expenditures for the Sister Cities Program were not precisely tracked  until FY 2013/2014, it is projected for this fiscal year, program expenses will be  approximately $18,660 including staff time.  This includes $2,218 for support of the  adult delegation to Toyokawa which occurs every five years.  There have been no  equivalent expenditures for the Hsinchu program.  In addition, The City has included  57 $3,000 in the FY 2013/2014 budget for promotional gifts for international delegations,  including those related to sister cities.    Fiscal Impact  The revised policy would limit expenditures for the Sister Cities Program to $5,000 per  year for each sister city that operates a student exchange program.  There would be no  additional fiscal impact unless additional sister city student exchange programs are  authorized by City Council in the future.    ____________________________________    Prepared by:  Laura D. Lee, Community Relations Coordinator; Jacqueline Guzman,  Human Resources Director  Reviewed by:  Carol A. Atwood, Director of Parks & Recreation  Approved for Submission by:  David Brandt, City Manager  Attachments:   A‐Policy‐redlined  B‐Sister Cities Study 11‐13‐13        58 POLICIES AND GUIDELINES ON SISTER CITIES FOR THE CITY OF CUPERTINO Background: Presently, Cupertino has two active sister cities registered with Sister Cities International, the cities of Toyokawa, Japan and Hsinchu, Taiwan. Intent of Sister City Affiliations: The city recognizes the value of developing people-to-people contacts as a way to further international communication and understanding. Sister city partnerships have proved very successful in fostering educational, technical, economic and cultural exchanges. Sister city relationships are effective only when organizations of interested residents in one community work with interested residents in another city to promote communication and understanding among people of different cultures. The ideal affiliation should involve a: large number of citizens and organizations in both cities, engaging in exchanges of people, ideas and cultures on a long-term, continuing basis. Sister city activities are to be promoted and managed by Sister City Committees and shall not be dependent upon City contributions. Interested citizen groups are responsible for implementing sister city programs. The City intends to provide limited financial support to those Sister City Committees that operate student exchange programs. Those Sister City organizations which do not operate st udent exchange programs shall be completely financially independent from the City.Interested citizen groups are responsible for implementing sister city programs. Sister City Citizen Committee Responsibilities (Receiving City Support): □ Identify, manage, coordinate and implement all activities related to the sister city program □ Establish a formal, incorporated 501 (c) (3) structure, with officers and appropriate functional subcommittees. □ Maintain communication with the affiliate sister city committee, ensuring the counterpart committee is equally committed to the program. □ Solicit donations and in-kind contributions from the local business community as appropriate. □ Finance from fundraising efforts and resources other than public funding, all travel and program expenses beyond reasonable postage, fax, copying and printing costs for events in which the City is participating. This includes fundraising or securing gifts for special celebrations, such as anniversaries. □ Prepare a detailed budget from fundraising efforts other than public (City) funding for events and activities and keep track of expenses. The budget should show funds available and should identify adequate, ongoing funding sources for program activities. 59 □ Work with city staff several weeks at least two months in advance in arranging official city promotional gifts and meetings for foreign delegations. For local groups traveling abroad and bringing city gifts, similar notice is required. Meet the following eligibility requirements/annual submittals: Proof of 501 (c) 3 status Detailed account of prior year actual revenue and expenses Summary of prior year activities Proposed budget plan Fundraising plan Work plan Sister City Citizen Committee Responsibilities (Not Receiving City Support): □ Identify, manage, coordinate and implement all activities related to the sister city program □ Maintain communication with the affiliate sister city committee, ensuring the counterpart committee is equally committed to the program. □ Solicit donations and in-kind contributions from the local community as appropriate. City of Cupertino Responsibilities (With regard to City supported Sister City Committees): Coordinated through the Parks and Recreation Service Department, the City will serve as a support for programs and activities by: □ Providing for set-up and complimentary access to a City facility for two community event per Sister City per fiscal year. All cost of food, drinks, and materials are the responsibility of the Sister City Committee. □ Offering city affiliation with official committee for purposes of coverage under ABAG insurance policy. □ Accepting gifts from the Sister City. Said gifts are the property of the City and shall be displa yed at a City facility or distributed at the City’s discretion. Coordinated through the City Manager’s Office, the City will serve as a support for Sister City programs and activities by: □ Providing access to postage, fax, copying and printing equipment to Sister City Committee members for support for sister city events in which the City is participating. City staff is not responsible for preparing mailings or printed materials. □ Providing the use of meeting room space (up to 18 per calendar year) at no cost to the Sister City Committee for related activities, except for a building attendant for after hour and weekend meetings. Meeting room space does not include Community Hall or the Quinlan Cupertino Room. □ Providing modest official City promotional gift items typically given at community events to government representatives from visiting countries. These include: city t-shirts, pens, reusable bags, and lapel pins. The cost of each promotional gift or gift bag shall not exceed $15. 60 Additional gifts presented to members of a Sister City delegation are the responsibility of the Sister City Committee. City of Cupertino Responsibilities (With regard to non-City supported Sister City Committees): The City shall maintain registration with the Sister Cities International organization and shall charge the Non-City Supported Sister City Committees resident rates on the rental of any City facility. Travel and Program Expenses: Program Expenses – The City Council will, as part of its annual budget adoption process for each fiscal year, to the extent deemed appropriate or necessary, determined and, establish a program budget for anticipated City supported Sister City program activities. This adopted budget, less the cost of the Sister City membership fee, will be remitted to the Committee once an accounting of the prior year expenditures have been received/reviewed by the Finance Department. These funds represent the City’s sole monetary commitment each fiscal year with the exception of the items listed above. · During the course of annual sister city program activities, specific expenditures from funds in the Adopted Sister Program budget must be approved by the City Council in advance. No disbursements will be made without approval by the City Council. Travel Expenses – Council or City Staff travel for Sister City programs must be funded by Sister City Committee fundraising activities, or by the individual traveling council or staff member, unless authorized in advance by the City Council. New Affiliations: The city also will not establish a relationship with more than one sister city in the same country and will have no more than four sister cities at one time. Future international relationships will involve cities that share characteristics with the city of Cupertino and demonstrate potential for economic growth and tourism. Generally, these cities should have a strong educational community component, house numerous high-technology companies or other characteristics common to the city of Cupertino. New sister city affiliation proposals must show opportunities for mutually beneficial cultural and educations exchanges and commitment to long-term program support for a successful ongoing relationship. To ensure that there is a broad base of community support for a global partnership, the citizen committee responsible for implementing the sister city program should include at least 20 10 active Cupertino residents who are committed to making a new affiliation successful. The committee should include Cupertino residents of different ethnic heritages. Proposal Process The new Sister City Committee will prepare and submit the following to the City of Cupertino: Detailed demographic profile of the prospective city 61 Documentation of broad-based community support, with a minimum of 510 members on the organizing committee. A preliminary program plan outlining objectives and funding sources. If the proposed sister city meets the criteria for a new sister city affiliation and the Sister City Committee demonstrates success in fundraising to implement the sister city program, staff will prepare a memorandum regarding a proposed sister city affiliation for the Council’s consideration.If the City Council adopts a resolution establishing a new Sister City relationship, the City shall register that new Sister City with Sister Cities International. If the proposed new Sister City Committee desires to operate a student exchange program and demonstrates that it can meet its responsibilities as a City supported Sister City Committee, the City shall adjust the budget for the following year to provide for financial support. Terminating a Sister City Affiliation While regrettable, it is sometimes necessary for a city to terminate a sister city affiliation. Sister city affiliations are meant to be long-standing, official city linkages that involve extensive community participation beyond government. For a variety of reasons, a sister city relationship may lose community interest and support, and Cupertino or the sister city may opt to terminate the sister city relationship. If a sister city affiliation is inactive for a period of three years and there is a lack of community support for the sister city relationship to continue, the City may initiate the process to terminate the sister city affiliation with the sister city and Sister Cities International. INTERNATIONAL DELEGATIONS ___________________________________________________ Background: Presently, Cupertino attracts many international delegations beyond its sister cities for business and economic development reasons. The City recognizes the value of developing people-to-people contacts as a way to further international communication and understanding. Delegations must contact city staff at least two months60 days in advance in arranging meetings, unless waived by the City Manager. Coordinated through the City Manager’s Office, the City will: □ Provide City promotional items typically given at community events to government representatives from visiting countries. These may include: city t-shirts, pens, reusable bags, and lapel pins. pins, to the extent there remains a budgeted amount to purchase such gifts and promotional items. □ Conduct tours of city facilities. Travel and Program Expenses: Program Expenses – 62 The City Council will, as part of its annual budget adoption process, establish a program budget for promotional items for delegations. Promotional gifts or gift bags shall not exceed the cost of $15 each. Travel Expenses – International travel shall be at the expense of the traveling council member unless authorized in advance by the City Council. Adopted by Cupertino City Council on September 20, 2005 Patrick Kwok, Mayor 63 Si s t e r  Ci t i e s  Su r v e y  12 ‐13    Ci t y   Po l i c y   De p t .   Bu d g e t   # of  ci t i e s   Ci t y  st a f f   re s p o n s i b i l i t i e s   Co m m i t t e e s ’   re s p o n s i b i l i t i e s   Gifts  Ca m p b e l l   Ye s   Ci t y  Ma n a g e r ’ s   Of f i c e   If  an t i c i p a t e d   ex p e n d i t u r e ,   fu n d s  bu d g e t e d   fo r  FY .  No  ac t i v i t y   in  re c e n t  ye a r s  so   no  bu d g e t .   (2 )  in  pa s t :   Ke e l u n g ,  Ta i w a n   & Ri o  Ve r d e ,   Me x i c o   Or g a n i z e  lo c a l  to u r s ,   ho s t s  re c e p t i o n s ;   Pr o c l a m a t i o n s  &  re s o l u t i o n s   Si s t e r  Ci t y   Co m m i t t e e  ru n s   pr o g r a m   City asks for help from businesses then follows with city promotional items (pins, pens, other)  Cu p e r t i n o   Ye s   Pa r k s  &  Re c r e a t i o n     $5 , 0 0 0  pe r  ci t y   (2 ) :  To y o k a w a ,   Ja p a n  & Hs i n c h u ,   Ta i w a n .   Co p e r t i n o ,  It a l y  &  Bh u b a n e s w a r ,   In d i a  ar e   co n s i d e r i n g   re g i s t r a t i o n   Pr o v i d e s  us e  of   me e t i n g  sp a c e ,  ci t y   af f i l i a t i o n ,  mo d e s t   of f i c i a l  ci t y  gi f t s ;  an d   re a s o n a b l e  po s t a g e ,   fa x ,  co p y i n g  an d   pr i n t i n g  su p p o r t   Id e n t i f y ,  ma n a g e ,   co o r d i n a t e  an d   im p l e m e n t  al l   ac t i v i t i e s ;  es t a b l i s h   a fo r m a l  50 1  (c )   (3 ) ;  fi n a n c e  fr o m   fu n d r a i s i n g  &  re s o u r c e s  ot h e r   th a n  pu b l i c   fu n d i n g ,  al l  tr a v e l  &  pr o g r a m  ex p e n s e s   City provides promotional items (reusable bags, t‐shirts, pens, travel & ceramic mugs, pins, pens, pencils, and sometimes history books. For anniversaries, city presents artwork (sculpture, paintings).  Gi l r o y   No   No n e   No n e ;  Ma y o r s   pa s t  & pr e s e n t   us e d  ca m p a i g n   fu n d s    6  To u r s  of  Ci t y  Ha l l ,   Li b r a r y ,  Po l i c e  De p t .   Co o r d i n a t e d  &  fu n d e d  ex c l u s i v e l y   by  Si s t e r  Ci t i e s   As s o c i a t i o n   None  Lo s  Al t o s   No   Cl e r k ’ s  Of f i c e   No  bu d g e t ;   Le s s  th a n  $1 , 0 0 0   se t  as i d e  fo r   vi s i t i n g   de l e g a t i o n s   (4 ) :  Ru s t i n g t o n ,   En g l a n d ,   Be n d i g o ,   Au s t r a l i a ,  Sh i h ‐ Li n ,  Ta i w a n ,   Sy k t y v k a r ,  Ru s s i a   Ci t y  st a f f  me m b e r   se r v e s  as  li a i s o n  fo r   Si s t e r  Ci t i e s ,  bu t   mo s t  wo r k  by  Lo s   Al t o s  Si s t e r  Ci t i e s  In c .   Ty p i c a l l y  ho s t   de l e g a t i o n  at  Ci t y   Ha l l  an d  on  re q u e s t ,   le a d  to u r s .   Mo s t  wo r k  by  Lo s   Al t o s  Si s t e r  Ci t i e s   In c .   Depends on delegation.   Lo s  Al t o s   Hi l l s     No  pr o g r a m            64 Si s t e r  Ci t i e s  Su r v e y  12 ‐13    Lo s  Ga t o s   No   Ci t y  Ma n a g e r ’ s   Of f i c e   No  bu d g e t   (3 )  ci t i e s   Ar r a n g e s  me e t i n g s   wi t h  To w n  of f i c i a l s ,   st a f f ,  an d  ot h e r   ag e n c i e s ,  if   re q u e s t e d .    Ma y  ho s t   a re c e p t i o n .     No  Si s t e r  Ci t y   co m m i t t e e s   The Town provides typical souvenirs (paper weights, mugs, history books, keys to the Town, etc.). If a similar delegation has visited, the Town presents art created by a Los Gatos artist (painting, photograph, sculpture).  Mi l p i t a s   Ye s   Si s t e r  Ci t i e s   Co m m i s s i o n   as s i s t e d  by  Ci t y   Ma n a g e r ’ s  st a f f   $2 , 6 0 0  fo r  ea c h  of   th r e e  ci t i e s .  No   bu d g e t  fo r  fo u r t h   ci t y .   (4 ) :  Da g u p a n ,   Ph i l i p p i n e s ,   Va l d a r n o ,  It a l y ,   Hu i z h o u ,  Ch i n a ,   Ts u k u b a ,  Ja p a n      Mo n t e   So r e n o     No  pr o g r a m             Mo r g a n   Hi l l     In f o  re q u e s t e d     (4 )  ci t i e s       Si s t e r  Ci t i e s  As s o c . Mo u n t a i n   Vi e w   Ye s   Ci t y  Cl e r k ’ s  Of f i c e    (2 )  ci t i e s :  Iw a t a ,   Ja p a n ,  Ha s s e l t ,   Be l g i u m     MV  Si s t e r  Ci t y   Af f i l i a t i o n   City pins, info packets, other welcoming gift, meeting with Mayor, attendance to an event and lunch/dinner hosted by city.  Pa l o  Al t o   No   Ci t y  Ma n a g e r ’ s   Of f i c e   No  se t  bu d g e t ,  bu t   fu n d s  re c e p t i o n s   (6 )  ci t i e s   Ad m i n .  su p p o r t  as   ne e d e d  & va r i e s   (a r r a n g e  ci t y   fa c i l i t i e s ,  ag e n d i z e   it e m s  @ co u n c i l   mt g s ) ;  pr o c l a m a t i o n s   No n p r o f i t ,   in d e p e n d e n t   or g a n i z a t i o n   Ne i g h b o r s  Ab r o a d   ru n s  da i l y   op e r a t i o n s   Provided by Neighbors Abroad since no city budget for gifts.  65 Si s t e r  Ci t i e s  Su r v e y  12 ‐13    Sa n  Jo s e   Ye s   Of f i c e  of   Ec o n o m i c   De v e l o p m e n t / C M   gr o u p   $2 , 5 0 0 / e a .  gr o u p   (a p p r o v e d   ex p e n s e s  &  re i m b u r s e m e n t s ) ;   Ad d i t i o n a l   ex p e n s e s  ne e d e d   to  ho s t    di n n e r s / e v e n t s  fo r   vi s i t i n g   de l e g a t i o n s  &  wh e n  ci t y  st a f f   tr a v e l s   (5 )  ac t i v e  si s t e r   ci t y  co m m i t t e e s :   Ok a y a m a ,  Ja p a n ;   Sa n  Jo s e ,  Co s t a   Ri c a ;  Ta i n a n ,   Ta i w a n ;  Du b l i n ,   Ir e l a n d ;  Pu n e ,   In d i a ;  Ve r a c r u z ,   Me x i c o  (i n a c t i v e )   Li m i t e d .  St a f f   in v o l v e d  in  vi s i t s  by   hi g h ‐le v e l   de l e g a t i o n s   Co m m i t t e e s  ar e   no n p r o f i t  an d   in d e p e n d e n t  fr o m   ci t y   Artwork, sports jerseys, pens, clocks, smaller mementos  Sa n t a   Cl a r a   Ye s   Cu l t u r a l   Co m m i s s i o n   $6 3 0 / g i f t s  &  pr o m o t i o n ;   $1 , 6 0 0   co n f e r e n c e s  &  me m b e r s h i p   (p o l i c y :  no  ou t ‐of ‐ st a t e  tr a v e l ) ;   $2 , 5 0 0  st u d e n t   sc h o l a r s h i p   $2 , 4 0 0  ho s t   st u d e n t s   (2 )  Iz i m o ,  Ja p a n ,   Po r t u g a l   St a f f  Cu l t u r a l   Co m m i s s i o n ;  ci t y   fa c i l i t y  to u r s   Si s t e r  Ci t i e s  As s o c .   co o r d i n a t e s   ex c h a n g e s  &  de l e g a t i o n s  an d   wo r k s  wi t h  Cu l t u r a l   Co m m i s s i o n  wh o   ma k e s   re c o m m e n d a t i o n s   to  co u n c i l     Sa r a t o g a   No    No  bu d g e t   (1 )   No  st a f f  ti m e   Ma n a g e d  by  Mu k o   Si s t e r  Ci t y  gr o u p ,   in p u t  fr o m  on e   co u n c i l m e m b e r ;   Oc c a s i o n a l l y  se e k s   ci t y  gr a n t  fu n d i n g   fo r  gi f t s .     Su n n y v a l e         No  pr o g r a m   Co m m i t t e e  in   pr o c e s s  of  fo r m i n g .       66 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3111 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 18, 2014      Subject  Approval of an agreement for consultant services for the Stevens Creek Boulevard to  McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan.    Recommendation  Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following:    1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a consultant agreement with MIG to  provide services to the City that will result in a comprehensive master plan for  the corridor and associated Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), for an amount  not to exceed $425,000.      2. Appropriate an additional $180,000 to provide for the expanded EIR cost and  alternatives and expanded noticing ($425,000 plus $55,000), for a total budget not  to exceed $480,000.  3. Authorize the City Manager to approve Contact Change Orders (CCO) for Items  1 and 2 above to the extent that total expenditures do not exceed the total amount  of the project budget.    Background  The Capital Improvements Program Budget for FY2013/14 appropriated $300,000 for  the Corridor Master Plan, which included a CEQA initial study technical memo.  The  main objectives of the entire process, from data gathering to the culmination of the Plan  itself, was to identify the values of the community, provide a City‐wide vision for  Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor, and establish a  strategic direction for delivery of programs.      A consultant selection process was initiated in September 2013 to select a consultant to  provide the professional services necessary to undertake the master plan.         67 Discussion  A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued on December 11th to firms having specific  experience in preparing park master plans for cities with similar characteristics to  Cupertino in size, demographics or project scope.  The City received two RFPs by the  January 6th due date.  A four‐person selection panel reviewed and ranked the firms  based on selection criteria and the firms were invited to interview.  Interviews were  conducted on January 22nd.  The firms were evaluated and ranked based on selection  criteria with MIG having the best overall proposal.    After consultation with the consultant and legal counsel, the proposed scope of work  was expanded to increase the level of CEQA review from an initial study/mitigated  negative declaration to a complete Environmental Impact Report.  This will require an  additional budget appropriation of $180,000.    Since it was founded in 1982, MIG, Inc. has focused on planning, designing and  sustaining environments that support human development and active lifestyles.  Their  professionals have assisted public, private and nonprofit organizations throughout the  country in projects that protect sensitive resources, enhance community livability,  support revitalization and connect people with places.        If approved, the consultants will start work in February with the scope of the work  projected to be completed within 12 months.  The project will be organized into four  phases, and public engagement is incorporated in each phase as follows:    ¾ Phase 1: Opportunities and Constraints will result in a detailed analysis that  incorporates technical information, quantitative assessments and feedback from  the community;    ¾ Phase 2: Needs Assessment and Alternatives Development includes a citywide  parks and recreation needs assessment using industry best practices, the creation  of a menu of design program elements for the corridor and the development of  different alternative scenarios for the corridor.    ¾ Phase 3: Master Plan Development will build the elements of the master plan  one by one, with community, staff and City leader feedback.    ¾ Phase 4: Plan Refinement and Adoption includes the preparation and  refinement of the Corridor Master Plan document, the CEQA documentation and  the review and adoption process.    68 Staff recommends that Council approve the agreement with MIG for the Corridor  Master Plan in the amount of $425,000.    Fiscal Impact  The FY2013/14 appropriation for the Corridor Master Plan CIP was originally set at  $300,000.  Approval of this project, which includes an expanded EIR, will require an  additional appropriation of $180,000.    _____________________________________________________________________________________    Prepared by:  Carol Atwood, Director of Parks and Recreation  Reviewed by:    Approved for Submission by:  David Brandt, City Manager            69 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3228 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  February 18, 2014    Subject:  Professional Plan Check Services for the Apple Campus 2 corporate auditorium project.    Recommendation:  Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to sign a Professional  Services Agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc. to provide plan check services for the  Apple Campus 2 corporate auditorium in the amount not to exceed $421,580  (Attachment A).     Discussion:  On January 25, 2013, the Community Development Department released an RFP  seeking professional Construction Inspection Services for the Apple Campus 2 project.   The City received proposals from 16 different firms in response to the RFP.  Each  proposal was evaluated and the City short‐listed eight firms to be interviewed.  The  evaluation criteria included experience, resource availability, technical qualifications,  methodology, quality assurance, conflict of interest, and cost of services.  The firms  were interviewed on February 26, 2013.  Based upon the evaluation and interviews,  CSG Consultants, Inc. was rated the most qualified to provide professional plan check  services for the corporate auditorium.      Fiscal Impact:  The Development Agreement with Apple Inc. requires Apple Inc. to reimburse the City for  100% of the actual costs of the contract plus 10% of the contract amount for the City’s  administrative and overhead costs.  The approximately $42,158 will be deposited into the  Building Division reserve account in the General Fund.      _____________________________________    Prepared by: Albert Salvador, Building Official  Reviewed by: Aarti Shrivastava, Community Development Director  Approved for Submission by:  David Brandt, City Manager  Attachments:  Professional Plan Check Services Contract  1 70 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND CSG CONSULTANTS, INC FOR PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR THE AC2 CORPORATE AUDITORIUM PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, for reference dated February 19, 2104, is by and between CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and CSG Consultants, Inc, a California corporation, whose address is 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard, 3rd Floor, San Mateo, CA 94402 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the Constitution and the statutes of the State of California and the Cupertino Municipal Code. B. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. D. City and Consultant desire to enter into an agreement not to exceed FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS ($421,580) upon the terms and conditions herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM: The term of this Agreement shall commence on February 19th, 2014, and shall terminate on December 31st, 2014, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: Consultant shall perform each and every service set forth in Exhibit "A”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT: Consultant shall be compensated for services performed pursuant to this Agreement in the amount not to exceed FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS ($421,580) set forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Payment shall be made by checks drawn on the treasury of the City, to be taken from the 110-7502-9327 fund. 71 4. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Consultant and City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Agreement. 5. STANDARD OF CARE: Consultant agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City nor have any contractual relationship with City. 6. INDEPENDENT PARTIES: City and Consultant intend that the relationship between them created by this Agreement is that of employer-independent contractor. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Agreement. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Consultant's services. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees, including but not limited to, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation plans, vacation and sick leave are available from City to Consultant, its employees or agents. Deductions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any fees due Consultant. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Consultant. 7. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IRCA): Consultant assumes any and all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of his/her employees performing work hereunder, pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Consultant. 8. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Consistent with City's policy that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable employer/employee conduct, Consultant agrees that harassment or discrimination directed toward a job applicant, a City employee, or a citizen by Consultant or Consultant's employee or subcontractor on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, disability, marital status, pregnancy, sex, age, or sexual orientation will not be tolerated. Consultant agrees that any and all violations of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 9. HOLD HARMLESS: Indemnification: Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to all services 72 performed in connection with the Agreement, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against any of them, including any injury to or death of any person or damage to property or other liability of any nature, whether physical, emotional, consequential or otherwise, arising out, pertaining to, or related to the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or Consultant’s employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees of counsel of City’s choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. B. Claims for Other Liability. Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to all services performed in connection with the Agreement, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever from and against any of them, including any injury to or death of any person or damage to property or other liability of any nature, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or Consultant's employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees of counsel of City’s choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. Consultant shall not be obligated under this Agreement to indemnify City to the extent that the damage is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of City, its agents or employees. C. Claims involving intellectual property. In addition to the obligations set forth in (A) and (B) above, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and against any Claim in which a violation of intellectual property rights, including but not limited to copyright or patent rights, is alleged that arises out of, pertains to, or relates to Consultant’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct under this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees of counsel of City’s choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. 10. INSURANCE: On or before the commencement of the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with paragraphs 9A, B, C, D and E. Such certificates, which do not limit Consultant's indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement: "Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the City of Cupertino by certified mail, Attention: City 73 Manager." It is agreed that Consultant shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Agreement all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Agreement with an insurance company that is acceptable to City and licensed to do insurance business in the State of California. Endorsements naming the City as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates. A. COVERAGE: Consultant shall maintain the following insurance coverage: (1) Workers' Compensation: Statutory coverage as required by the State of California. (2) Liability: Commercial general liability coverage in the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury: $500,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate - all other Property Damage: $100,000 each occurrence $250,000 aggregate If submitted, combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amounts of $1,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits shown above. (3) Automotive: Comprehensive automotive liability coverage in the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury: $500,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $100,000 each occurrence or Combined Single Limit: $500,000 each occurrence (4) Professional Liability: Professional liability insurance which includes coverage for the professional acts, errors and omissions of Consultant in the amount of at least $1,000,000. B. SUBROGATION WAIVER: Consultant agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which he/she has agreed to provide comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance, Consultant shall look solely to his/her insurance for recovery. Consultant hereby grants to City, on behalf of any insurer providing comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance to either Consultant or City with respect to the services of Consultant herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said Consultant may acquire against City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. C. FAILURE TO SECURE: If Consultant at any time during the term hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in the 74 Consultant's name or as an agent of the Consultant and shall be compensated by the Consultant for the costs of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed from the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid. D. ADDITIONAL INSURED: City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees and volunteers shall be named as an additional insured under all insurance coverages, except any professional liability insurance, required by this Agreement. The naming of an additional insured shall not affect any recovery to which such additional insured would be entitled under this policy if not named as such additional insured. An additional insured named herein shall not be held liable for any premium, deductible portion of any loss, or expense of any nature on this policy or any extension thereof. Any other insurance held by an additional insured shall not be required to contribute anything toward any loss or expense covered by the insurance provided by this policy. E. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Consultant. Consultant is advised to confer with Consultant's insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Consultant. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Consultant warrants that it is not a conflict of interest for Consultant to perform the services required by this Agreement. Consultant may be required to fill out a conflict of interest form if the services provided under this Agreement require Consultant to make certain governmental decisions or serve in a staff capacity as defined in Title 2, Division 6, Section 18700 of the California Code of Regulations. 12. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS: Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for money by Consultant from City under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. Written notice of such assignment shall be promptly furnished to City by Consultant. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant, if Consultant is a partnership or joint venture or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power of the corporation. 13. SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL: Unless prior written consent from City is obtained, only those people and subcontractors whose names and resumes are attached to this Agreement shall be used 75 in the performance of this Agreement. In the event that Consultant employs subcontractors, such subcontractors shall be required to furnish proof of workers' compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general, automobile and professional liability insurance in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Consultant. In addition, any work or services subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each provision of this Agreement. 14. PERMITS AND LICENSES: Consultant, at his/her sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all appropriate permits, certificates and licenses including, but not limited to, a City Business License, that may be required in connection with the performance of services hereunder. 15. REPORTS: A. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record and other document, hereinafter collectively referred to as "Report", reproduced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement, shall be the exclusive property of City. Consultant shall not copyright any Report required by this Agreement and shall execute appropriate documents to assign to City the copyright to Reports created pursuant to this Agreement. Any Report, information and data acquired or required by this Agreement shall become the property of City, and all publication rights are reserved to City. Consultant may retain a copy of any report furnished to the City pursuant to this Agreement. B. All Reports prepared by Consultant may be used by City in execution or implementation of: (1) The original Project for which Consultant was hired; (2) Completion of the original Project by others; (3) Subsequent additions to the original project; and/or (4) Other City projects as appropriate. C. Consultant shall, at such time and in such form as City may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services required under this Agreement. D. All Reports required to be provided by this Agreement shall be printed on recycled paper. All Reports shall be copied on both sides of the paper except for one original, which shall be single sided. E. No Report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available to any individual or organization by Consultant without prior approval by City. 16. RECORDS: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified 76 and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to such books and records to the representatives of City or its designees at all proper times, and gives City the right to examine and audit same, and to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. If supplemental examination or audit of the records is necessary due to concerns raised by City's preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City's supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of contract or failure to act in good faith, then Consultant shall reimburse City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit. 17. NOTICES: All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at: City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino CA 95014 Attention: Aarti Shrivastava All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at: CSG Consultants, Inc 1700 S Amphlett Blvd, 3rd Floor San Mateo, CA 94402 Attn: Cyrus Kianpour 18. TERMINATION: In the event Consultant fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions hereof at the time and in the manner required hereunder, Consultant shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within within the time specified after receipt by Consultant from City of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, City may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the Consultant written notice thereof. City shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving seven (7) days' prior written notice to Consultant as provided 77 herein. Upon termination of this Agreement, each party shall pay to the other party that portion of compensation specified in this Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the effective date of termination. 19. COMPLIANCES: Consultant shall comply with all state or federal laws and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by City. 20. CONFLICT OF LAW: This Agreement shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of California excepting any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Agreement and obligations of the parties are subject to all valid laws, orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Agreement (or the successors of those authorities.) Any suits brought pursuant to this Agreement shall be filed with the courts of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. 21. ADVERTISEMENT: Consultant shall not post, exhibit, display or allow to be posted, exhibited, displayed any signs, advertising, show bills, lithographs, posters or cards of any kind pertaining to the services performed under this Agreement unless prior written approval has been secured from City to do otherwise. 22. WAIVER: A waiver by City of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character. 23. INTEGRATED CONTRACT: This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Consultant. 24. INSERTED PROVISIONS: Each provision and clause required by law to be inserted into the Agreement shall be deemed to be enacted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though each were included herein. If through mistake or otherwise, any such provision is not inserted or is not correctly inserted, the Agreement shall be amended to make such insertion on application by either party. 25. CAPTIONS: 78 The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of the Agreement and in no way affect, limit or amplify the terms or provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the Agreement to be executed. CONSULTANT CITY OF CUPERTINO A Municipal Corporation CSG Consultants, Inc By By Title Albert Salvador, Building Official Date Date RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Aarti Shrivastava, Director Community Development Department David Brandt, City Manager Community Development Department APPROVED AS TO FORM: Carol Korade, City Attorney ATTEST: ______________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Attachments Exhibit A EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 110-7502-9327 $421,580 PO # 79 PREPARED BY CSG Consultants, Inc. December 2, 2013 Proposal to the City of Cupertino For Structural Plan Check Apple Campus 2 Corportate Auditorium 80 PROPOSAL TO THE City of Cupertino FOR Structural Plan Check Apple Campus 2 Corporate Auditorium PREPARED BY CSG Consultants, Inc. December 2, 2013 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard | 3rd Floor | San Mateo, CA 94402 phone (650) 5222500 | fax (650) 522-2599 | www.csgwebsite.com San Mateo • Sacramento • Pleasanton • Newman • Salinas • Santa Ana 81 Table of Contents SECTION 1 Cover Letter SECTION 2 Project Team Organization SECTION 3 Project Approach SECTION 4 Staff Resumes SECTION 5 Project Descriptions SECTION 6 Fee Schedule 82 December 2, 2013 Albert Salvador PE Building Official 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014‐3255 Re: Structural Plan Check Apple Campus 2 Corporate Auditorium CSG Consultants, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal for consideration as a consultant for plan review services for the Apple Campus 2 Corporate Auditorium. Our firm brings a local full-time service office located less than 30 minutes away, that is knowledgeable , and has had a longtime, successful working relationship with the City as well as with other public service agencies within the area. CSG has furnished consulting to services to the City for many years and looks forward to a containing relationship with the City.. We have assembled a strong, highly experienced team of managers and staff to offer the City a large pool of resources with maximum flexibility. We propose the services of Paul Armstrong, PE, CBO, as main point of contact and Project Manager for this contract. Mr. Armstrong brings the highest level of administration and quality control to all projects. I will serve as Principal in Charge, and will be responsible for overall quality control, delivery and service. For all contract related services my contact information is below. Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS | President, Principal in Charge 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard | 3rd Floor | San Mateo, CA 94402 phone (650) 522-2500 | fax (650) 522-2599 | cell (650) 333-0386 | cyrus@csgengr.com Paul Armstrong, PE, CBO | Project Manager 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard | 3rd Floor | San Mateo, CA 94402 phone (650) 522-2500 | cell (714) 679-9769| paul@csgengr.com We have also included very qualified team of sub-consultants that include A.T.Merovich & Associates and TTG. We look forward to working on a project of this significance and look forward to hearing from you soon. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me directly at (650) 333-0386. Sincerely, Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS President 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard | 3rd Floor | San Mateo, CA 94402 phone (650) 522-2500 | fax (650) 522-2599 | www.csgwebsite.com SECTION 1 83 Project Team Organization General Organization CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is a California company with our headquarter office in San Mateo within convenient travel to the City of Cupertino offices. Additional support is available from our other offices in Pleasanton, Salinas, Newman, Sacramento, and Santa Ana. Founded in 1991, we provide a wide range of consultant services to agencies including planning, community development, building and fire life safety, development review services and construction management services. The majority of the 150+ individuals within our firm have provided public agency services throughout their entire career. CSG Consultants, Inc. is staffed with locally available project managers, plan review engineers, senior plans examiners, senior building inspectors, CASp plan review and inspection personnel—all with extensive public agency experience and committed to serving clients on various assignments over variable lengths of time. The main portion of key proposed team members have worked collaboratively together for many years on both special project assignments as well as assigned to client jurisdictions. To better serve clients, CSG often teams with selected partners; all handpicked firms of high reputation and experience as well as longtime success on large-scale, complex projects. Project Manager Paul Armstrong, PE, CBO, offers a strong background in plan review and code development from his longtime position with ICC/ICBO as well as service as serving as a Building Official. Mr. Armstrong possess a comprehensive knowledge of code from his 25 years experience in the building codes and standards community, including his work with all the Uniform and International Codes, ASCE 7, ANSI A117.1, FHAct, ADA, CA Title 24 Accessibility regulations, as well as many additional code-related projects. Mr. Armstrong has managed the building and safety service line for varied consultant firms within California. He continues to successfully provide oversight, coordination and quality control of all plan review and inspection services for multiple client jurisdictions. He is extremely familiar in presenting solid solutions to clients, architects and developers as well as homeowners on code related issues, currently performing structural plan review for multiple jurisdictions. CSG Support Team Ginsun Ku, SE, PE | Alternate Michael Loomis,SE, CASp, CBO, LEED AP Khoa Duong, PE Ritchie Kato, SE, PE, CASp Chi Tran, SE Ed Chock, SE Phuong Devries PE Shweta Parakash PE SECTION 2 84 Project Approach All building plan review including, ADA, code compliance, architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy and structural engineering will be conducted by CSG staff and sub-consultants team. The electrical, mechanical, plumbing and energy conservation aspects will be reviewed by our sub-consultants TTG. Our staff of licensed structural engineers will also be assisted by A.T. Merovich & Associates in reviewing seismic and base isolation design related to the structure. All project plan reviews will be exclusively channeled through our state-of-the-art digital plan review system (GreenVue), expediting the plan review process as well as eliminating the need for paper submittals. Any paper plans submitted to CSG will be immediately scanned into digital files and stored on our servers for speedy access to both the applicants and our plan reviewers. Our plan reviewers furnish electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to the projects prescribed formats. It is our understanding that all fire and life safety related issues will be excluded from the scope of our review however fire life safety issues will have to be coordinated with other elements of the design. GreenVue allows for complete project tracking and documents the review process in through a web based system. Applicants have 24/7 access to all plan reviews submitted and performed so status of any review is immediately known. The system provides automatic email notifications to key parties at milestones in the review process, so no time is lost in communication or in shipping comments back- and-forth. Our review staff has the technical support, tools, and technical expertise to review and coordinate all project reviews at the highest level. Compliance Standards Our team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and focus on the special needs and requirements of each of our clients. We promise prompt turnaround times and offer comprehensive online status reports. Our plan checkers carefully review all documents for compliance with building codes, fire codes, energy conservation standards, State accessibility regulations, and all local ordinances. We understand and will comply with the City’s requirements for plan review services. Our engineers and plan reviewers review plans for compliance with all policy and model codes adopted by the State of California, including but not limited to:  2010 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2  2010 California Residential Code  2010 California Electrical Code  2010 California Plumbing Code  2010 California Mechanical Code  2010 California Fire Code as jointly published by the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) as amended and adopted by the State of California (Title-24, Part 9 California Fire Code)  National Fire Codes as published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); as adopted and referenced by the State of California (California Code of Regulations, Title-19, Section 1.09)  2010 State Historical Building Code  2008 / 2010 California Energy Code  2010 California Green Building Code  NPDES/WQMP/SWPPP Compliance  City adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building and municipal codes, including project Conditions of Approval from other City departments, divisions, regulating agencies, and jurisdictions SECTION 3 85 Green Building and LEED Certifications CSG Consultants has all the qualifications necessary to assist the City in both the development of policy and the implementation of green and sustainable building practices. The Environmental and Sustainable Program division of CSG can assist with construction and demolition recycling programs as well as public outreach involved in the building industry. We have Certified Green Building Professionals (CGBP) and LEED accredited personnel on staff. Our proposed project staff is experienced in plan review and inspection for compliance with CalGreen and local green building ordinances. Plan Check Comments All plan check comments will be formatted to the City’s established correction list templates. Any additional forms established by the City for alternative methods of construction and/or deviations from requirements, such as disabled access, will be incorporated into the correction comments and returned with the appropriate recommendations. In addition, Internet access is available for transferring plan check comments. This will enable City staff to immediately modify our checklist for incorporation with other department comments. Online Plan Check Status CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to check plan review status and comments online. By logging on to our website, clicking on Plan Check Status, and entering a password, staff as well as authorized applicants, can view each project document and communicate with the plan checker via e-mail or post-a-note. With a password, staff or authorized applicants can download comments from the web upon completion of the plan review. There is no additional cost for this service. CASp Services We understand California Building Departments are required to have a CASp certified person in place and available for technical questions and interpretations. Our CASp certified staff are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possesses the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. In accordance with newly-formed rules and regulations, we can supply a CASp certified professional to review all plans for accessibility and will comply with regulations to provide a sufficient number of building department staff who are CASP certified by January 1, 2014. Mike Loomis, SE, PE, LEED, CASP, is highly certified in multiple disciplines as a DSA Certified Access Specialist, a Certified Building Official and Master Code Professional with demonstrated skills in enforcing a full range of state codes as well as specifications and standards. His work as a CASp professional involves many years ensuring compliance with California accessibility requirements found in the California the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Standards for Accessible Design and Chapter 11 of the California Building Code, providing expertise to public agencies, homeowners, architects, developers and contractors in the development of plans and review and comments on site- specific issues related to accessibility. Specific attention is given to assisting in compliance with CBC Chapter 11B and ADA design standards for maximum accessibility for all new and existing construction. His CASp evaluations, assessments and inspections include elements such as routes of travel from/to public transportation (if adjacent to the property line), routes of travel from/to the public right-of-way, parking, passenger drop-off and loading zones, walks and sidewalks, curb ramps, ramps, entrances and exits, horizontal/vertical access, lobbies, elevators, platform (wheelchair) lifts, doors and gates, toilet rooms, signage, counters, waiting and seating areas, public telephones, drinking fountains, alarms, assistive listening systems, and access to and through all rooms and spaces. Plan review comments are generated after the 86 review has been completed, including all requirements needed to provide a CASp certification. Specialized reports are generated pinpointing any issues or challenges with succinct, understandable comments. A proactive approach to all discussions and required documents will move the project quickly toward completion. Project Meetings Our lead plan reviewers Paul Armstrong will be available for the weekly project meetings to be held at the project site. If additional meetings are necessary these can be facilitated by video conference calls or audio conference calls. Our team is available to serve this project and it will be our highest priority. Turnaround Times We anticipate project submittals will be broken down into manageable portions and phases; the first review of any portion of plans will be completed within 10 days in the second review or subsequent reviews of the completed within 5 days. Recording CSG Consultants’ website provides up-to-date information to our clients for the safety of their plan checks and comments for each plan review. CSG will also utilize our own in-house construction management software that tracks and logs all the RFI’s, change orders, inspections reports and all other related documents. A custom report can be designed to address any needs the City may have. Quality Control CSG’s in-house quality assurance/quality control program utilizes a peer review process with multi-level internal plan checking and senior-level manager directly associated with the project supports experienced staff in the review process to maintain consistency between projects. All plan reviews and documents are reviewed internally by a senior level manager prior to being released. Structural Engineering CSG staff will be supplemented by the expertise of A.T.Merovich & Associates for reviewing the seismic design and the proposed base isolation system and other analysis relating to such issue. A.T. Merovich team will be led by Andrew T. Merovich. Resumes for key staff are provided in the following section. The unique design elements and the architectural style of the proposed building and the base isolation system is a major component of the design and the combined team of structural engineers from CSG and A.T. Merovich will lend their expertise both in code compliance and design to the project team. Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy and Electrical CSG has engaged the services of TTG to perform all the above services under one contract. TTG is currently providing the same type of services for other work taking place on the Apple campus. The TTG team will consist of registered mechanical and electrical engineers who will be managed by Mr. Armstrong as for the required turnaround and problem solving. The resumes of various staff from TTG are included in the following section. 87 Staff Resumes On the following pages are the resumes of the proposed staff for the City’s review. SECTION 4 88 Paul LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Professional Engineer, State of California | 45464 Building Official | ICC 0002014-CB EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering California State University | Long Beach, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Secretariat: International Residential Code 1 and 2 Family Dwellings | 1997-2000 Co-Secretariat: ICC Performance Based Building Code Secretariat: International Zoning Code | 1996-2000 Secretariat: General Design, Administrative, Lateral Design, Fire and Life Safety and Fire Risk Code Committees of ICBO | 1992-1996 Technical Editor: 1997 Uniform Codes and UBC Handbook NIBS HHS Code Comparison Committee | 1994 FEMA Building Performance Review Team Member | 1993 NIBS Flood Standards Comparison Committee | 1992 Coordinator, Pacific Rim Conference on Performance Based Codes Various ASCE Standards committees SEAOC Code Committee liaison ASME A17.1 Code Coordinating Committee ANSI Construction Standards Board AWARDS CALBO Instructor of the Year Armstrong PE, CB O Senior Plan Review Engineer Building Official Paul offers a strong background in plan review and code development from his longtime position with ICBO/ICC starting as an engineer and ending as the Vice President. Paul was the Building Official for El Monte and “knows code” from many angles with 24 years experience in the building codes and standards community, including his work with all the Uniform and International Codes, ASCE 7, ANSI A117.1, FHAct, ADA, CA Title 24 Accessibility regulations. At CSG Paul combines his wealth of knowledge, hard work, and excellent customer services; tap into Paul for all code related issues including effective plan review and inspection solutions. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Building & Safety Services Manager Paul managed the building and safety service line for varied consultant firms in Southern California. Responsible for oversight, coordination and quality control of plan review and inspection services for client jurisdictions. Provide client care and assistance on code related issues. He currently performs structural plan review for multiple jurisdictions. Regional Manager Responsible for the development of new business and the maintenance of existing contracts for full-service building departments, inspection services and plan review services for various jurisdictions in Southern California. Vice President | Architectural a n d Engineering Services D e p a r t m e n t Paul managed ICBO Technical Services department responsible for the maintenance of the code development process, plan review service and code opinion service for both external and internal customers. He represented ICC to many national, state and local organizations and is responsible for the technical image of the conference. He provided technical assistance on code related issues to both jurisdictional and professional members and non-members and provided research on many code-related issues. 89 Ginsun Ku SE, PE, CB O Structural Plan Review Engineer LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Structural Engineer, State of California | SE3089 Civil Engineer, State of California | C33204 Structural Engineer, State of Nevada | 13131 Civil Engineer, State of Nevada | 13131 Certified Plans Examiner | ICC 26677 Building Official | ICC 2268 EDUCATION Master of Science, Structural Engineering University of Southern California | Los Angeles, CA Mr. Ku is a Senior Structural Engineer for CSG Consultants, Inc. His experience in complex public, commercial, industrial, and residential structures provides CSG with the highest quality in plan review. Mr. Ku’s expertise includes structural design and plan review for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances, engineering standards and specifications, supplemental energy requirements, and state accessibility regulations. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Plan Review Engineer Prior to his employment with CSG, Mr. Ku served as a Plan Review Engineer for a well- regarded plan review firm in southern California. He was responsible for the structural design and plan review of a full spectrum of building types and occupancies. Mr. Ku has worked with various design companies and different municipalities throughout California. His work within the arena of local government has provided Mr. Ku with an understanding of how building departments function and the importance of serving the public. Mr. Ku has directed and participated in numerous projects, both designing and plan reviewing buildings and industrial facilities. He has designed a wide variety of commercial, industrial and private projects, ranging from small, single-family residences and mid-rise commercial buildings, to major industrial and educational facilities. Elite Advisor | Republic of China ’s Director of Airport Development His employment as an Elite Advisor to the Republic of China’s Director of Airport Development provided Mr. Ku with valuable experience in the coordination, design review, and supervisory construction of expansion projects. 90 Mike LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Professional Engineer, State of California | C60787 Structural Engineer, State of California | S4824 Certified Building Official | 8000164 LEED Accredited Professional Certified Access Specialist | CASp-099 Certified California Building Plans Examiner | ICC 8000164-I6 California Residential Building Inspector | ICC 8000164-J1 ICC Certified Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner | ICC 8000164-J1 EDUCATION Master of Science, Civil Engineering Santa Clara University | Santa Clara, CA Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Santa Clara University | Santa Clara, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Santa Clara University: Timber Design | Adjunct lecturer Earthquake Engineering | Adjunct lecturer Strength of Materials | Adjunct lecturer County of Amador | CASp presentation to small business owners ICC/Peninsula Chapter | Structural Provisions of the 2010 California Residential Code | Studying for the CASp exam Loomis SE, PE, CB O, CASp, LEED Structural Plan Review Engineer Building Official Mr. Loomis provides CSG and clients over 15 years of professional experience in the building industry. Michael’s demonstrated knowledge of both the California and International Building Codes are reflected in his roles as both an adjunct lecturer at Santa Clara University and as a structural plan check engineer for CSG. Mr. Loomis has experience in all forms of structural construction, including: steel, concrete, masonry, heavy timber, and light-gauge steel materials. Michael has also served as a peer reviewer for OSHPD and DSA projects. Michael serves in a supervisory role in CGS’s plan check division; managing and acting as a mentor to CGS’s growing team of engineers and technical staff on a wide variety of projects throughout California. He provides consultation to local jurisdictions regarding structural, accessibility and green building compliance and has worked in-house for jurisdictions providing plan review, building inspection, over the counter plan review and as Building Official. Mr. Loomis’ expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential structures for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances, engineering standards and specifications, supplemental energy requirements, and accessibility regulations. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Linear Coherent Light Source II Expansion | SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory This project consisted of the underground expansion to an accelerator. Project included office space as well as special use experimental spaces and utilized mining design and construction techniques. Gilead Sciences, Inc. | City of Foster City, CA A five stories H and B occupancy biotech building project included challenging occupancy separations as well as adverse soil conditions. Santa Cruz Warriors Arena | City o f Santa Cr u z, CA New 3,000 seat basketball arena with associated restrooms, locker rooms and concessions. Palo Alto History Museum | City o f P a l o A l to, CA This project involved the extensive remodel of historic building to house history museum and archive. Revised usage required careful study of exiting systems. This project utilized CBHC provisions for accessibility. Ocean Street Commons | City of Santa Cruz, CA This project consisted of 9 residential units over commercial space and was wood framed construction. Multiple tenant improvement projects of varying size as well as multiple new and additions to single-family homes. JURISDICTIONAL EXPERIENCE Residential / Commercial Building Inspector Town of Atherton; City of Brisbane; City of Half Moon Bay; Town of Los Altos Hills; City of Pacifica; City of Sausalito; Town of Monte Sereno; SLAC Linear Accelerator Laboratory; Town of Woodside. In-House Plan Review Town of Atherton; City of Santa Cruz; City of Salinas; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Over the Counter Plan Review Town of Atherton; City of Belmont; City of Pacifica; City of Santa Cruz; City of Sausalito; Town of Woodside. 91 Khoa LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Professional Engineer, State of California | 43901 Professional Engineer, State of Nevada | 013620 Certified Plans Examiner | ICC 0840436-B3 Certified CEC Non-Residential | ICC NR05-94-5665 Certified CEC Residential | ICC R05-05-5055 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering California Polytechnic State University | Pomona, CA Duong PE Vice President, Southern California Building Fire & Life Safety Mr. Duong serves as CSG’s Building & Life Safety Manager and performs the key role of plan review quality control. With more than twenty five years of experience in building plan review, including onsite plan check engineer services, Khoa ensures that CSG’s clients receive the highest quality plan review services. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Duong worked in both the public and private sectors. His experience includes the following:  Vice President in charge of plan review for Berryman & Henigar, where he worked for ten years.  Supervising plan review engineer for Willdan, where he was responsible for the day-to-day operations of the plan review section in the San Bernardino office and served as plan review engineer for numerous cities and counties throughout California and Nevada.  Plan review engineer with the City of San Diego Building Department. Mr. Duong’s expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential structures for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances, engineering standards and specifications, supplemental energy requirements, and ADA regulations. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Plan Check Engineer |Various California Jurisdictions Khoa has served as Plan Check Engineer for the Cities of Turlock, Burlingame, Rancho Cordova, Chino, Murrieta, and Costa Mesa. Mr. Duong performed structural plan check and non-structural MEP, energy, as well as ADA reviews for commercial, industrial, and residential structures. In-House Plan Check Engineer | Various California Jurisdictions Khoa has served as an In-House Plan Check Engineer for the Cities of Orange, Fullerton, Yorba Linda, Tustin, Westminster, and La Habra, performing structural plan check and non-structural MEP, energy, and ADA reviews. He interfaced with developers, architects, and engineers. 92 Kato SE, PE, CASp Structural Plan Review Engineer Ritchie Certified Access Specialist LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Structural Engineer, State of California | SE2650 Civil Engineer, State of California | C31833 Certified Access Specialist | CASp-272 EDUCATION Master of Science, Structural Engineering Stanford University | Palo Alto, CA Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering California Polytechnic State University | Pomona, CA Mr. Kato is a Structural Engineer for CSG Consultants, Inc. His extensive experience in performing plan review on public, commercial, industrial, and residential structures provides CSG’s clients with premiere quality plan review services. His expertise includes structural design and plan review for compliance with all applicable codes, accessibility, and energy requirements. Prior to his employment with CSG, Mr. Kato was the Principal for Kato Engineering, where he performed structural engineering consulting services for public and private clients. He was responsible for structural design and structural plan reviewing for a full spectrum of building types and occupancies. His employment with the City of Westminster provided him with extensive plan review experience. Mr. Kato reviewed plans for compliance with all relevant state and local codes. Subsequent to his work with the City of Westminster as a plan review engineer, Mr. Kato was commissioned by the City to update the municipal code to correspond to current California code requirements. Mr. Kato has performed plan review for the Westminster City Hall and Police Station, Laguna Hills High School, Chapman University, Whittier Christian High School, and the City of Orange, Main Public Library. His extensive knowledge of public buildings and his commitment to timeliness and quality contribute greatly to each jurisdiction he serves. Mr. Kato was commissioned as full-time Building Official for the City of La Habra. Recommended by the City of Orange, Mr. Kato assisted the City of La Habra’s Building Department during their period of transition, supervising and managing plan review, inspection and counter staff, coordinating the various building departments, and managing personnel issues. Additionally, Mr. Kato coordinated City and private projects with the building, planning, engineering, and public works departments, worked to update the City’s municipal code, and provide feedback to facilitate development of efficient departmental practices and procedures. Mr. Kato has the expertise and broad experience necessary to effectively coordinate, foster, and help develop all aspects of a municipal building department. 93 Chi Tran PE, SE, CBO Structural Plan Review Engineer Building Official LICENSES and CERTIFICATIONS Structural Engineer, State of California 2728 Civil Engineer, State of California 33643 Certified Building Official | 1061872-CB Certified Building Plans Examiner | 1061872-B3 MEMBERSHIPS California Building Officials Association (CALBO) International Code Council EDUCATION Masters of Science, Civil Engineering | California Polytechnic University Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering | California Polytechnic University Masters in Business Administration | California Polytechnic University Mr. Tran provides professional structural engineering and building official services for CSG Consultants. With over 30 years experience in the building industry, Mr. Tran has a demonstrated knowledge of both the California and International Building Codes as reflected in his numerous years serving as a project engineer, plan check supervisor, building permits manager and building official. Mr. Tran has experience in all forms of structural construction, including: steel, concrete, masonry, timber, and light-gauge steel materials. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Tran worked for the County of Orange in various capacities; including plan check supervisor, project engineer and building official. Mr. Tran has a thorough working knowledge of how Building Departments function and his various roles reflect his wide range of knowledge and experience. Mr. Tran’s expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential structures for compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances, engineering standards and specifications, supplemental energy requirements, and ADA regulations. Some notable projects include: RELEVANT EXPERIENCE  Hotel and Resort Projects  Ritz Carlton Resort and Hotel, Laguna Niguel  Pelican Hill Resort and Hotel, Newport Coast  Multi-Story Office Buildings  7-Story Coldwell Bank Office Building, Lake Forest  Airport Terminals  John Wayne Airport Terminal Building and Parking Structures, Santa Ana  Detention Facilities  7-Story Orange County Juvenile Court Building, Orange Theo Lacy Jail and Juvenile Hall | City of Orange, CA Musick Jail Facility | City of Irvine, CA Joplin Juvenile Facility | City of Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Soka University | City of Aliso Viejo, CA 94 Ed Chock SE, PE, CB O Structural Engineer Building Official LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Structural Engineer, State of California | 3759 Structural Engineer, State of Nevada | 018605 Structural Engineer, State of Arizona | 51735 Structural Engineer, State of Utah | 7850765-2203 Professional Engineer, State of California | 24158 Professional Engineer, State of Nevada | 018605 Professional Engineer, State of Texas | 106754 Certified Building Official | ICC 3118 Certified Plans Examiner | ICC 88554 EDUCATION Master of Science, Civil Engineering California State University | Long Beach, CA Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering California State University | Long Beach, CA As a Structural Engineer for CSG Consultants, Ed provides plan review of complex structural and non-structural buildings for numerous government agencies and municipal jurisdictions. He has a thorough knowledge of local, state and international building codes. Ed has both public and private sector experience. Prior to joining CSG, he worked as a consultant Plan Review Manager, with oversight in the day to day operations of the building plan review division. Ed also served as Building Official for the City of Dana Point; providing building department management for the City; responsible for plan check, building inspection and the public counter staff. Additional private experience includes serving as Plan Review Division Manager for a consultant company with duties including plan check of buildings and structures for compliance with the California Building Code, Title 24 Disabled Accessibility and Energy requirements, coordination of plan check service with contract jurisdictions and staff supervision. As an Engineer with the County of Orange, his duties included plan checking, public counter service and issuing building permits for building projects in the County’s unincorporated areas. Ed also served as a Senior Facilities Design Specialist/Lead Structural Engineer for Rockwell International’s Rocketdyne Division in Canoga Park. In this role, his responsibilities included design and construction management of construction project for company facilities such as rocket test stands, manufacturing and industrial buildings, office renovations, bridge crane systems and pipe support systems. Duties included structural design and drafting, project management, construction coordination, review of vendor's design and management of the structural design unit. In addition, he supervised the engineering of the civil/structural design group. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Consultant Plan Review Manager Duties included plan checking, management of the plan review function, hiring and training plan check staff and providing building official services to contract cities. Building Official | City of Dana Point, CA Mr. Chock was responsible for the day to day operation of the City’s Building Department; including plan review, permitting and inspection. Civil Engineer | County of Orange, CA Mr. Chock performed plan check, counter service and permit issuance for the County. 95 Phuong LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Plans Examiner, State of California | ICC 8012279 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering California State University | San Jose, CA Devries Building Plans Examiner As a Plans Examiner in CSG’s Northern California Division, Ms. Devries performs building plan review for a variety of projects in many jurisdictions throughout the region. Her extensive experience in complex residential construction has provided her with a strong understanding of the California Building, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Energy Codes. She also specializes in both residential and commercial photovoltaic systems. Her broad understanding of code issues coupled with her strong work ethic allow her to provide quick and accurate plan reviews. Armed with a positive attitude and a proactive style, Ms. Devries works directly with architects, engineers, and owners to clearly communicate issues identified during the plan review process. This focus on customer service often prevents projects from requiring multiple resubmittals. Using the latest technology, Ms. Devries is capable of performing completely digital plan review. Without the added expense and time of delivering hard copy project documents, the review and approval time for a project can be greatly accelerated. Ms. Devries has attended many continuing education opportunities including seminars on photovoltaic systems, California Energy Code requirements, and OSHPD compliance. She also regularly attends Tri-chapter Uniform Code Committee meetings to review and discuss code development issues with her peers. Prior to joining CSG Consultants, Ms. Devries worked as a Structural Engineering Intern for Max Cheng & Associates in Morgan Hill. In this capacity, she reviewed deferred submittal truss calculations for pre-engineered roof and floor systems. In addition, she assisted in preparing construction documents in coordination with design engineers. 96 Shweta LICENSES and CERTIFICATES Professional Engineer, State of California | 79808 ICC Building Plans Examiner | 8014122 EDUCATION Masters, Civil Engineering University of California | Berkeley, CA Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering San Jose State University | San Jose, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Society of Women Engineers Chi Epsilon National Civil Engineering Honor Society Prakash PE Plan Review Engineer Shweta reviews plans for all types of construction including, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems for both commercial and residential structures in her position as plan review engineer. In addition, she has a thorough understanding of Green Building and Energy Code regulations as well as holds extensive experience in the review of photovoltaic systems. She is competent and proficient at all elements of customer service making her a valuable resource as an onsite plan review engineer for numerous jurisdictions throughout the Bay Area. Having worked both in public and private sectors, she has a thorough understanding of all state and local building safety regulations and enforcement of the building and life safety codes. Shweta is also skilled in digital plan review and successfully delivers projects from the beginning stages to final approval. She keeps current within the building industry though routine seminar attendance through the International Code Council and the California Building Officials. Since 2007 Shweta has worked with CSG, first as an intern, working her way up to plans examiner to plan review engineer performing comprehensive review of plans including structural, fire life safety and ADA requirements. Prior to joining CSG Consultants, she worked at the Port of San Francisco as an engineering intern and as structural engineering intern at a Rinne and Peterson, a structural engineering firm. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Homa Natoma | Los Altos Hills, CA Private Residence The Ridge Development | Brisbane, CA Master Plan Chipotle Mexican Grill | Brentwood, CA Tenant Improvement Mattress Discounters | Santa Cruz, CA Tenant Improvement 97 Sub-Consultants Below are the resumes for the proposed Sub-Consultants. A.T. Merovich & Associates will be providing structural engineering support to CSG. TTG will provide mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering. 98 A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Apple Auditorium, 13923 Andrew T. Merovich Education: Georgia Institute of Technology University of Washington • B.S., Civil Engineering, 1970 • M.S., Civil Engineering, 1971 Registrations: • CA Civil Engineer, No. 23965, 1974 • CA Structural Engineer, No. 2237, 1978 Applied Technology Council Professional Affiliations: • President, 2001-2002 • Director, 1996-2003 Structural Engineers Association of Northern California: Fellow (1971 – Present) • President, 2005-2006 • Chair, Professional Practices Committee, 1996- 1997, Chair, Seismology Committee, 1990-1991 • Director 2004-2007 American Society of Civil Engineers, Member (1971 – Present) • Seismic Rehabilitation Standards Committee, Member, 1997-2000 Structural Engineering Institute (1992-Present) • Charter Member Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Member (1994 - Present) • Performance Based Design Action Plan, Steering Committee Member, 1997-1999 Structural Engineers Association of California (Fellow): • Board of Directors, 2004-2007, Secretary (2005-2007) • Performance Based Engineering Ad Hoc Committee Member, 1997 • Professional Practices Committee Member, 1996-1997 • Seismology Committee Member, 1989-1992 Experience: Mr. Merovich has over 40 years of structural engineering experience in the San Francisco Bay area. He has been a pioneer in the development and application of seismic resistant structural systems and is a recognized expert in the field of earthquake engineering. Selected Publications: “An Action Plan for Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings: ATC 71”, 2009 ATC-SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Buildings and other Structures, Proceedings, December, 2009. “FEMA 356: Application to the Seismic Rehabilitation of a Reinforced Concrete Masonry Structure with a Metal Deck Diaphragm”, Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, 2005 Spring Seminar Proceedings, March 2005. “The Embarcadero Center Post Earthquake Recovery Program”, Proceedings of the Disaster Resistant California Conference 2003, April 2003 “Lessons Learned, Seismic Rehabilitation of Steel Buildings:, Structural Engineer, March 2000 “Future Characterizations of Ground Motion for Design (An Engineer’s Perspective)”, Workshop on Improved Characterization of Strong Ground Shaking for Seismic Design, Redwood City, California, ATC-35-3, July 1997. “Seismic Upgrade for a Concrete Frame”, Modern Steel Construction, May 1993. Positions: A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Berkeley, California • President, 1994-Present DASSE Design, Inc. San Francisco, California • Principal, 1987-1994 URS/ John A. Blume & Associates San Francisco, California • Manager of Special Projects Division, 1985-1987 • Project Manager, 1980-1985 • Lead Senior Engineer, 1976-1980 • Senior Engineer, 1974-1976 99 A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Apple Auditorium, 13923 Jeffrey E. Taner Education: University of California Berkeley: • B.S. Civil Engineering, 1987 • M.S. Structural Engineering, 1988 Registrations: • California Civil Engineering, No.46266, 1990 • California Structural Engineering, No. 3863, 1993 Professional Affiliations: Structural Engineers Association of Northern California: • Chair, Professional Practices Committee 2006-2010 • Member, Seismology Committee 1995-Present • Member, Existing Buildings Committee 1995-Present • Professional Engineering Institute, Instructor 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers • Member 2010-Present Experience: Mr. Taner has over twenty years of structural engineering experience in the San Francisco Bay area. He has been in responsible charge of the structural design and analysis of a wide range of building types. He has extensive analytical experience in both linear and non-linear structural analysis techniques. Positions: A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Berkeley, California • Vice President 1995-Present DASSE Design of Southern California, Inc. Irvine, California • Project Engineer 1993-1994 1989-1993 DASSE Design, Inc. San Francisco, California • Project Engineer Robinson, Meier, Juilly & Associates South San Francisco, California • Staff Engineer 1988-1989 100 A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Apple Auditorium, 13923 Colin Blaney Education: California Polytechnic State University: • B.S. Civil Engineering, 1989 Registrations: • California Civil Engineer, No. 50580 • California Structural Engineer, No. 4377 Professional Affiliations: Structural Engineers Association of Northern California: • President Elect 2012-2013 • Member, Board of Directors 2010-Present • Chair, Existing Buildings Committee 2007-2010 • Edwin Zacher Outstanding Service Award 2009 American Institute of Steel Construction • Member Experience: Mr. Blaney has more than 24 years’ experience in the design, plancheck and peer review of sigificant facilities throughout California in the role of principal-in-charge. He possesses extensive experience with both the design-bid-build and design-build project delivery approaches. Mr. Blaney also maintains an active role in the development and review of State and national codes, is a frequent speaker for SEAOC, and has published numerous technical papers for SEAOC, EERI, and various other technical organizations. Between 2007 and 2010 Colin also served as cahirman to SEAONC’s existing building committee and is currently preseident-elect for the Structural Engineers’ Association of Northern California. Colin also received the 2009 Edwin B. Zacher Award for outstanding professional service for SEAONC and for his contributions to the Structural Engineering Profession and was recently named a SEAONC Fellow. Positions: ZFA Structural Engineers San Francisco, California • Executive Principal 2013-Present The Crosby Group Redwood City, California • Principal 1990-2012 101 A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Apple Auditorium, 13923 Robin Wendler Education: California Polytechnic State University: • B.S. Civil Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champain • M.S. Civil Engineering Registrations: • California Civil Engineer, No. 41240 • California Structural Engineer, No. 3445 Professional Affiliations: California Coalition for Adequate School Housing (CASH) Experience: Ms. Wendler has focused on the structural design, engineering and plan review of a multitude of complex building structures including public, recreational, industrial and educational facilities for 28 years. Her design project portfolio includes numerous retrofits of existing facilities, plus a wealth of new structures, such as police, fire and community centers, wineries, libraries, gymnasiums and performing arts buildings. In addition to her design work, Ms. Wendler has been a plan review consultant for the California Division of the State Architect for 16 years and has a broad understanding of the detailed code requirements for public facililties. Her expertise in the design process has given her valuable insights into effective, efficient and collaborative design review services. Positions: ZFA Structural Engineers San Francisco, California • Principal 1985-Present 102 A.T. Merovich & Associates, Inc. Apple Auditorium, 13923 Ian Aiken Education: University of Auckland, New Zealand: • B.S. Civil Engineering, 1986 University of California, Berkeley: • M.S. Structural Engineering, 1988 • PhD. Structural Engineering, 1990 Registrations: • California Civil Engineer, No.48734 Professional Affiliations: Structural Engineers Association of Northern Calif, Member Base Isolation Comm American Society of Civil Engineers, Member Base Isolation Code Committee Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Member AASHTO T-3 Working Group, Member Experience: Dr. Aiken has twenty years of experience in earthquake, structural and civil engineering. Specialist areas encompass eleven years of experience in the field of seismic isolation, and nine years of experience in the field of passive energy dissipation for seismic structural control. His interest and activities in the field of seismic isolation began in 1984, with involvement on two full-scale field tests of isolated bridges in New Zealand. Since then he has been extensively involved in research activities in the field. These have included more than 15 experimental studies of the dynamic characteristics of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings, and 4 earthquake simulator studies of the performance of different isolated structures. In 1986 he developed an interest in the field of structural control, and it was in this area, passive energy dissipation for seismic structural control, that he received his Ph.D. in 1990. His research work involved the earthquake simulator testing and analytical studies of a large structural frame with two different types of passive damping systems. He is familiar with various seismic design requirements including the Uniform Building Code, the SEAOC Blue Book and the New Zealand seismic code. He has published more than 70 technical papers and reports related to earthquake engineering, primarily in the fields of isolation and passive energy dissipation for seismic structural control. Positions: Seismic Isolation Engineering, Inc. Emeryville, California • President 1993-Present University of California, Berkeley • Research Engineer 1990-1996 University of California, Berkeley • Research Assistant 1986-1990 103 KEY PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Resumes Education B.S. Electrical Engineering University of Engineering & Technology Lahore, Pakistan 1980 B.S. Mathematics/ Physics Punjab University Lahore, Pakistan 1974 Professional Licenses E13828: EE CALIFORNIA E72067: EE PENNSYLVANIA E10643: EE HAWAII Membership The Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers Years of Experience 35 years NASEER AHMED, P.E. Lead Electrical Plan Review Designee Mr. Ahmed has over 35 years of varied experience in plan review, design, management, and construction relating to electrical utilities for the building industry. He is experienced in the plan review and design of fire alarm, fire protection, industrial power distribution, motor control centers, process control panels, lighting and grounding systems for educational, governmental, healthcare, military, correctional and institutional facilities. Mr. Ahmed has designed and reviewed several on site power generation projects to include geothermal, solar, wind and cogeneration. Mr. Ahmed has years of practical construction management and construction administration experience. During these years he has performed several construction management duties such as responding to RFI’s, submittal review, justification of change orders, cost, prepare alternative design of problems, review of substitutions, etc. His experience includes plan review, design of power distribution signal, fire alarm and voice/data system infrastructure for hospitals and schools. He has designed emergency generator plants and electrical for chillers, cooling towers, boiler plants for hospitals. Mr. Ahmed recently completed the following renewable energy and sustainable system design: • 400 MW Various Solar Fields • Geothermal • Fuel Cell Study • Cogeneration Systems • Daylighting Modeling • State of the Art Integrated Building Controls Relevant Project Experience • Apple Campus 2, Cupertino, CA Plan Review Services • AOC, New Long Beach Courthouse, Long Beach, CA Independent Building Expert (Peer Review) • Pacific Beacon Military Housing, San Diego, CA Peer Review • LAC + USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA Peer Review • Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, Adelanto, CA 10MW LADWP Adelanto Solar Power Plant • LAPD New Headquarters Office Building, Los Angeles, CA New LEED Gold Facility & Parking Structure • Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, CA Tom Bradley International Terminal & West Side Expansion • City of Los Angeles, Department of Water & Power, Los Angeles, CA Renewable Energy Contract - On-Call Transmission Services 104 Education B.S. Mechanical Engineering California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 1982 Professional Licenses M24519 ME CALIFORNIA ME NEVADA ME ARIZONA ME COLORADO ME MINNESOTA ME OHIO AEE - CERTIFIED COMMISSIONING PROFESSIONAL Membership American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, & Air Conditioning Engineers American Society of Mechanical Engineers Association of Energy Engineers California Society for Healthcare Engineering (CHSE) Years of Experience 30 years CHRIS RADTKE, P.E. Lead Mechanical Plan Review Designee Mr. Radtke has over 30 years of experience in all aspects of mechanical systems design for various project types including institutional, educational, recreational, municipal, and health care facilities. He is knowledgeable of mechanical code requirements for various hospital functions through numerous code-upgrade projects. His experience includes technical analysis of heating and air conditioning systems for energy efficiency, feasibility studies, utility master planning studies, mechanical system design, cost estimating, bidding and negotiations, construction administration and system start-up assistance. Mr. Radtke has over 25 years of practical construction management and construction administration experience. Mr. Radtke has experience in the design and retrofit of central heating and cooling plants including chilled water and hot water distribution systems, and low and high pressure steam plants. His experience also includes phased construction and remodel of plants while in operation. He has designed cogeneration plants utilizing natural gas reciprocating engine prime movers with heat recovery systems in the form of both low and high pressure steam ranging in size up to 1800 kW. He has designed mechanical systems for hospital areas such as ICU/ CCU suites, surgery rooms, cardiac catheterization labs, radiation therapy, same day surgery rooms, emergency rooms, and neonatal intensive care units for many leading medical institutions in Southern California. Project Experience • Apple Campus 2, Cupertino, CA Plan Review Services • AOC, New Long Beach Courthouse, Long Beach, CA Independent Building Expert (Peer Review) • LAPD New Headquarters Office Building, Los Angeles, CA New LEED Gold Facility & Parking Structure • High Desert Medical Center, Joshua Tree, CA Utilities Assessment and Cogeneration System Feasibility Study & Various On- Going Projects • San Antonio Community Hospital, Upland, CA Southeast Expansion & Central Plant Upgrade • Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA Complete HVAC Upgrade • Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Ontario, CA Surgery Center, Medical Office Building & Central Plant • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA Ambulatory/Surgery/Emergency Care Facility KEY PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Resumes 105 Education New York City Community College Brooklyn, NY 1970-1972 New York University, New York 1975 Construction Specifications Institute 1979 Professional Licenses Certificate: Water Treatment and Plumbing Systems Certificate: Construction Documents and Specifications Certificate: Fundamentals of Leadership Management Membership American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Years of Experience 40 years AL SAEZ Plumbing Engineer Mr. Saez experience extends over 40 years of consulting engineering experience in the plumbing and fire protection trades covering a vast field of commercial, institutional and healthcare projects. During the past 20 years he has been involved with large healthcare projects for the private and public sector clientele. His responsibilities include management and design of projects from master planning, initial conception through construction documents, including observation of construction and commissioning. He has performed design and/or engineer in a supervising role for private and public sector clients in the Middle East, Continental United States, numerous cities and counties in California; Veteran Administration, Dept. of the Air Force; Corps of Engineers; and the Department of the Navy. Project Experience • AOC, New Long Beach Courthouse, Long Beach, CA Independent Building Expert (Peer Review) • Apple Campus 2, Cupertino, CA Plan Review Services • Pasadena Water & Power – Office & Warehouse, Pasadena, CA New LEED Gold Facility • Providence Holy Cross Medical Center, Mission Hills, CA Renovation • LAPD Headquarters, Los Angeles, CA New LEED Gold Facility including Offices • Petaluma Health Center, Petaluma, CA Single Story Building Renovation including Offices • Watson Center & Technology Training Center, Culver City, CA New LEED Platinum Facility including Offices • Los Robles Regional Medical Center, Thousand Oaks, CA Renovation & Additions KEY PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Resumes 106 Education B.S. Environmental Sciences University of California, Irvine Membership USGBC IBPSA Certifications Certified Energy Plans Examiner LEED AP BD+C Years of Experience 5 years NILAY DESAI, CEPE, LEED AP BD+C Energy Calculations, Mechanical Engineer Mr. Desai is skilled in the fields of energy analysis and sustainable design. Mr. Desai’s experience includes the analysis of K-12 schools, universities, theaters, hospitals, prisons, offices, and airports. His specializations include building energy modeling, life cycle cost analysis, and LEED compliance. Mr. Desai is also well versed in Thermal, Daylight, and Natural Ventilation analysis and simulation. His knowledge of cost analysis, federal energy efficiency tax incentives, and utility rebates has resulted in significant cost savings for both building owners and design teams. Mr. Desai plays an integral role in the design team, collaborating with all disciplines to develop the most cost effective and energy efficient building design. Project Experience • Gateway Plaza, Pasadena, CA 12th & 13th Floor Renovation, Energy Modeling (LEED CI) • LA Mission College Student Services Center, Sylmar, CA Energy Modeling, Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LEED Platinum) • LA Southwest College Annex, Los Angeles, CA Energy Modeling & Load Calculations (LEED Platinum) • California Health Care Facilities, Stockton, CA Energy Modeling, Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LEED Silver) • Los Angeles World Airports, Los Angeles, CA T5 Renovation Energy Modeling & Load Calculations • Los Angeles World Airports, Los Angeles, CA LAX-CUP Energy Consumption Analysis • VA San Diego SCI/CLC, San Diego, CA Energy Modeling, Daylight & Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LEED Gold) • Alan Hancock Fine Arts Complex, Santa Maria, CA Energy Modeling, Natural Ventilation & Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LEED Silver) • West LACC Watson Center, Culver City, CA Energy Modeling & Load Calculations (LEED Platinum) • Health Education Facilities, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia Energy Modeling, Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LEED Certified) • Apple Campus 2, Cupertino, CA Plan Review Services KEY PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Resumes 107 Project Descriptions All projects to follow were selected for their significance and relevance to the Apple Campus 2 project: STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Ernie Gomes EHS Manager 2575 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 738-7341 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center – LINAC Coherent Light Source Project CSG provided plan review and building Inspection services for Stanford Accelerator Center’s new $400 million state-of-the-art research facility. Staff furnished the following services:  Third party plan reviews for new commercial and industrial (structural and non-structural) buildings, remodels, tenant improvements and infrastructure to assure compliance with design documents, codes, Department of Energy standards and applicable regulatory requirements  Fire prevention  Building inspection  Quality control and safety oversight services for onsite University inspection and project management staff Staff developed job and campus-wide specifications for design means and methods and provided third party expertise in resolving both foreseeable and unforeseen construction conditions. The scope for this project included the review of proposed building plans to include electrical, plumbing, mechanical, civil and grading from concept level through final design. Science and User-Support Building, SLAC Linear Accelerator Laboratory CSG assisted with plan reviews and Structural ADJ for the Science and User Support Building. This building consisted of multiple A occupancy spaces, commercial kitchen, as well as B and H occupancy spaces. CSG staff attended meetings with design development team, users, government representatives and contractors to provide code consultation on the development of bid documents for the design build project. SECTION 5 108 LINAC Coherent Light Source 11 (LCLS 11), SLAC Linear Accelerator Laboratory CSG provided plan review as well as Structural ADJ for the LINAC Coherent Light Source 11 Project. The project consisted of an addition to the accelerator hall and related experimental facilities, all subterranean.CSG worked closely with users, government representatives, contractors, and the design team to address issues regarding code compliance. In addition to plan review, CSG also checked Architectural, Structural, MEP, Fire and Energy aspects of the projects. CITY OF ANAHEIM Jon Traw, P.E. Chief Building Official 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 (714) 765-5153 Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) CSG performed fire and life safety and electrical reviews for the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) project; a world-class development project in the City of Anaheim at 2626 Katella Road. ARTIC combines a transportation gateway and mixed-use activity center on a 16-acre site owned by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the City of Anaheim. Construction details include a 120 foot high clam shell-like, 2-story structure and interior mezzanine. The structure is connected to train platforms by a bridge. ARTIC will serve as a hub for Orange County and the region where freeways, major arterials, bus routes and Orange County’s backbone rail system converge. ARTIC services will include: OCTA bus, Anaheim Resort Transit, airport flyaway shuttles, taxi, and tour and charter buses as well as accommodate future plans for the Anaheim Rapid Connection (ARC) and high-speed trains. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Mark Ellis, BO Building Official 809 Center Street, Room 206 Santa Cruz, CA (831) 420-5127 KAISER PERMANENTE ARENA CSG led plan reviews for the new Kaiser Permanente Arena located in Santa Cruz, CA. In order to meet the contractual obligations of the City and the ownership group of the Santa Cruz Warriors, this 3000 seat arena held its first event 4 months after submittal of the first package of drawings. Throughout the duration of the project, CSG staff attended meetings, visited the site and using digital submittal methods, was able to immediately review and approve design changes in the field in order to adhere to the tight schedule. 109 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Jim Kirkman Building Official 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 (650) 877-8551 Terra Bay Development Terra Bay development has been one of the most challenging development projects in the Bay Area. The project entitlement process involved wet lands endangered species of plants and butterflies with one of the most significant archeological sites as well as significant infrastructure and freeway improvements in several phases. Under City direction, CSG provided plan assistance in the entitlement process, plan checking, construction observation for conformance with City standards and SWPPP requirements. The mixed use project consists of single family residential dwellings, town homes, condominiums, as well as office and commercial space. Genentech Development Project consisted of 3.6 million square feet of office and research and development space. CSG coordinated pre- construction meetings to clarify and resolve all matters prior to plan submittal, provided building plan review services, on-call building inspection services, coordinated and resolved construction issues between the City, project engineer, Genentech project manager, and special inspector(s), and provided plan review and inspection services for 30 ft. state-of-the-art gunite retaining wall; finished project resembles sandstone.CSG has been providing plan review and inspection services for all of the Genentech Campus Buildings since 1991. 110 CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Kamal Fallaha City Engineer 2415 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 853-3189 University Circle CSG Consultants provided comprehensive development review services involving planning, engineering, building, and fire life safety for the City of East Palo Alto and the Redevelopment Agency.  Included construction of a Four Seasons Hotel and over $500,000 Class A office spaces  Assisted in relocation of multiple businesses  Coordinated with neighboring Cities and communities  Reviewed plans for on- and off-site improvements, hydrology, compliance with Geotechnical recommendations and CEQA Represented the City in coordinating with Caltrans for timely delivery of projects within State right-of-way Supervised construction of off-site improvements valued at $15,000,000 Reviewed grading drainage plan Reviewed utility plans and undergrounding Reviewed engineering plans for utility and road relocation Managed relocation of freeway ramps Reviewed building drawings and plans Supervised construction of improvements and coordinated with Caltrans for off-ramp modifications Participated in numerous hearings and presentations to City Council and various neighborhood organization CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Scott Hess AICP Director 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5241 Hoag Hospital Expansion CSG performed complete plan review for this project; approximately 52,775 sq. ft. three-story addition to an existing 52,177 sq. ft. medical office building. The structure is of Type II-B, fully sprinklered, with a designation of occupancy group B. In addition, CSG reviewed new construction of a four-story, 192,079 sq. ft., 486 stall parking structure. The structure is of Type I-B, with an occupancy group designation of S-2 open parking garage. The structure is supported on mat-foundation. Parking decks are constructed of a post- tensioned slab. Dual systems, concrete shear walls and concrete moment frames are used to resist lateral loads. The expanded services will include urgent care, pharmacy, rehab/therapy, imaging, a wellness center for public education, medical oncology/infusion, and physician clinical space. All deadlines and expectations were met or exceeded. 111 CITY OF YORBA LINDA Robert Silva Building Official 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, CA 92886 (714) 961-7120 Richard Nixon Library  Coordinated and provided building and structural plan review throughout the project  Reviewed plans for on-site improvements  Assisted the City in handling Architects, Structural Engineers, and overall plan check comments  Worked with staff and development team from the beginning to ensure all questions pertaining to the structure were addressed, thereby allowing construction to start on time  Participated in numerous hearings and presentations to City Council and various neighborhood organizations 112 Rate and Service Structure Description Hours per week Hours per Year (Two Years) Hourly Rate Cost Plan Check Coordination Meetings, Plan Check & RFIs CSG Paul Armstrong 8 832 $140 $116,480 Phuong Devries 7 728 $120 $87,360 Shweta Prakash 3 312 $120 $37,440 Ginsun Ku 2 208 $140 $29,120 Mike Loomis 60 $140 $8,400 Subtotal 1 20 2140 $278,800 Sub-Consultants A.T Merovich-Structural $85,000 TTG- Electrical Sub-Consultant 112 $160 $17,920 TTG-Energy Sub Consultants 31 $160 $4,960 TTG- Mechanical Sub-Consultant 108 $160 $17,280 TTG- Plumbing Sub-Consultant 29 $160 $4,640 Subtotal 2 280 $129,800 Mark up on Sub- Consultants 10% $12,980 Total $421,580 SECTION 6 113 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT  Meeting: February 18, 2014  Subject  Adopt a resolution approving the purchase and lease after sale of property at 22050  Stevens Creek Boulevard (APN 357‐10‐002) from George and Yoshiko Blesch, in the  amount of $1,575,000, authorizing the City Manager to execute all the necessary  documents to complete the acquisition and the lease agreement.     Recommended Action  Adopt resolution No. 14‐___, approving the purchase and lease after sale of property at  22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard (APN 357‐10‐002) from George and Yoshiko Blesch, in  the amount of $1,575,000, authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary  documents to complete the acquisition and the lease agreement.    Discussion  In September of 2013, Mr. George Blesch contacted the City to verify the City’s interest  in purchasing his property at 22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard.  The 0.64 acre property is  located on the south side of Stevens Creek Boulevard, between the City’s Stocklmeir  property and the Blackberry Farm Golf Course parking lot, on the bank of Stevens  Creek (see attached map).  The acquisition of this property will complete the City’s  ownership of the portion of the Stevens Creek corridor from Blackberry Farm to Stevens  Creek Boulevard, which is the subject of a master planning process that will be  beginning this year.  City Staff hired Valbridge Property Advisors to appraise the  property.  At a City Council closed session meeting held in November of 2013, City  Council directed staff to negotiate a sale price for the purchase of the Blesch’s property.    City staff negotiated a sale price of $1,575,000 with Mr. Blesch and prepared a Purchase  Agreement for the acquisition.  The Blesch’s have requested that the City lease back the  property to them until such time that they are able to find a new residence.  The initial  term of the lease is to extend from close of escrow until October 1, 2014, and details of  this provision are included as Exhibit D in the agreement.  The Blesch’s have accepted  the terms of the Purchase Agreement and have signed as to their intent.    Staff is recommending that City Council approve the agreement and authorize the City  Manager to execute all of the necessary documents to complete the transaction.      114 Fiscal Impact  The Purchase price is $1,575,000.  The City’s current Park Dedication funds will be used  for the purchase of the property.    ___________________________________  Prepared by: Chad Mosley, Senior Engineer  Reviewed by:  Timm Borden, Director of Public Works  Approved for Submission by:  David Brandt, City Manager  Attachments:    A. Resolution   B. Map  C. Purchase Agreement    115 RESOLUTION NO. 14‐___    A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO   APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND LEASE AFTER SALE OF REAL PROPERTY   FROM GEORGE AND YOSHIKO BLESCH   AT 22050 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (APN 357‐10‐002)  AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO   EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO COMPLETE THE ACQUISITION  AND LEASE       WHEREAS, the City Council, in a closed session meeting on November  4th, 2014, had directed staff to negotiate the purchase of the real property located  at 22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Property) from George and Yoshiko Blesch;  and     WHEREAS, in February of 2014, staff completed negotiations and the  property owners have signed a purchase agreement which includes a lease  agreement for the Property after the sale, the terms of which are part of the  Agreement for Purchase of Real Property by and Between the City of Cupertino  and George and Yoshiko Blesch (“Agreement”), subject to the approval of the  City Council; and     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City  of Cupertino hereby approves the purchase and lease after sale of the property   located at 22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard, from George and Yoshiko Blesch in  the purchase amount of $1,575,000.00, and upon other terms as set forth in the  Agreement, including the Lease as detailed in the Agreement, Exhibit “D”; and  further authorizes the City Manager to execute all of the necessary documents to  complete the acquisition and lease of the Property.      PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the  City of Cupertino on the 18th day of February 2014, by the following vote:    Vote  Members of the City Council    AYES:    NOES:    ABSENT:   ABSTAIN:     116 Resolution No. 14‐    Page 2    ATTEST:     APPROVED:          _______________________   ________________________________  Grace Schmidt, City Clerk   Gilbert Wong, Mayor, City of Cupertino                117 221 2 0 10103 21 9 2 1 10 1 4 0 21 9 2 0 21 9 2 5 10180 10204 21 9 1 8 10210 10168 10156 10104 10115 10127 10139 10151 10163 10175 10187 10199 10211 10091 10079 10067 10055 1004510035 10025 10015 10005 21 9 3 0 21 9 4 0 10 0 1 2 10022 10032 10042 10052 1005910049 10039 10066 10090 2 2 0 5 0 22 1 0 0 21915 21920 21925 10145 10111 10101 10077 10057 10017 10027 10010 10012 10020 10022 10030 10032 221 2 3 221 1 3 221 0 3 220 9 3 10060 10062 10070 10072 22 1 2 5 22 1 1 5 22 1 0 5 22 0 9 5 22 0 9 6 22 1 0 6 22 1 1 6 22 1 2 6 22 1 3 6 22 1 4 6 10110 10112 1012 0 1 0 1 2 2 22 2 2 5 22 1 6 8 22 1 4 5 10 1 1 1 10 1 0 6 10 1 0 7 10 1 0 9 10 1 1 0 10 1 0 8 22 0 3 4 22 0 5 4 22 0 8 4 221 0 4 221 1 5 22 0 8 5 22 0 6 5 10041 10061 10081 22 0 6 6 22086 22116 22126 22156 22 0 6 7 22 0 4 7 21 9 6 7 2195 7 21947 21946 2 1 9 5 6 21966 100 5 8 10038 10018 10 0 0 9 10 0 1 9 10 0 2 9 100 3 9 10049 10059 10069 10079 1008910100 10090 10080 10060 10040 10030 10010 21917 BY R N E A V E STEVENS CREEK BLVD SC E N I C B L V D PH A R L A P D R BY R N E C T DEAN CT O A K L E A F P L STOCKLMEIR C T CLEARCREEK CT LOMITA AVE AD E L H E I D C T . ATTACHMENT B 22050 Stevens Creek Blvd. APN 357 10 002 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 18, 2014    Subject  City Project, 2013 Pavement Maintenance Phase 1, Project No. 2013‐01.    Recommended Action  Accept Project No. 2013‐01.    Discussion  The City’s contractor, O’Grady Paving, Inc., has completed work on the 2013 Pavement  Maintenance Phase 1 Project, which consisted of asphalt overlays, removal/replacement  of failed asphalt, and crack sealing at various locations throughout the City.  Staff has  inspected the work and found that it meets the requirements of the contract.    _____________________________________    Prepared by:  Jo Anne Johnson, Senior Engineering Technician  Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works   Approved for Submission by:  David Brandt, City Manager  Attachments:     A‐ 2013 Pavement Maintenance Phase 1 Street List    139  2013 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PHASE 1 STREET LIST ATTACHMENT A STREET NAMEFROM STREETTO STREETTREATMENT AINSWORTH DRHARTMANENDOVERLAY ALDERBROOK LNBOLLINGER ENDOVERLAY ALDERBROOK WYALDERBROOK LNENDOVERLAY ANSON AVEMILFORDRUMFORDOVERLAY BAYWOOD CTMERRITTENDOVERLAY BAYWOOD DRMERRITTPEAR TREE LNOVERLAY BEL AIRE CTCOLUMBUSENDOVERLAY BETLIN AVEJOHN DRCLIFFORDOVERLAY BLANEY AVESTEVENS CREEK BLVDBOLLINGER RDISOLATED REPAIRS CYPRESS CTCYPRESS DRENDOVERLAY CYPRESS DRMERRITT DRENDOVERLAY DE ANZAHOMESTEAD RDBOLLINGER RDCRACK SEAL DE ANZA BLVDHOMESTEAD RDBOLLINGER RDISOLATED REPAIRS DEADORA DRMERRITT DRENDOVERLAY ESQUIRE PLMERRITT DRENDOVERLAY GREENLEAF DRFLORA VISTASTELLING RDOVERLAY HOMESTEAD RDLOS ALTOS LIMITBERNARDO AVEISOLATED REPAIRS IMPERIAL AVE10290 IMPERIAL SOUTH ENDLEVELING COURSE LUBEC STANSON AVEENDOVERLAY METEOR PLMETEOR DRENDOVERLAY MILFORD DRCASTINEANSON WAYOVERLAY NORMANDY CTSOMERSETENDOVERLAY OLIVE AVEIMPERIAL AVEORANGE AVELEVELING COURSE ORANGE AVEMCCLELLAN RDHERMOSA AVELEVELING COURSE PASADENA AVEGRANADA AVEOLIVE AVELEVELING COURSE RAINBOW DRBUBB RDSTELLING RDISOLATED REPAIRS RUCKER DRSANTA TERESA DRYDENOVERLAY S PORTAL AVESTEVENS CREEK BLVDWINTERGREENOVERLAY SAN FERNANDO CTSAN FERNANDO AVEENDOVERLAY SOMERSET CTSOMERSET DRENDOVERLAY SOMERSET DRFARALLONE DRBLANEYOVERLAY STELLING RD280 BRIDGE DECK450' N OF BRIDGEOVERLAY STELLING RDALVES DRGREENLEAF DRISOLATED REPAIRS STEVENS CREEK BLVDDE ANZA BLVDSTERN AVECRACK SEAL STEVENS CREEK BLVDDE ANZA BLVDSTERN AVEISOLATED REPAIRS SYCAMORE CTOAK VALLEY RDENDISOLATED REPAIRS VARIAN WAYAINSWORTH ENDOVERLAY VICKSBURG CTMILLEREAST ESTATESOVERLAY VICKSBURG DRMILLEREAST ESTATESOVERLAY WALNUT CIRCLEFOOTHILL BLVDFOOTHILL BLVDOVERLAY WILLOWBROOK WAYLINDENBROOKENDOVERLAY 140