Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
14-050 MIG, Inc consultant services for Stevens Creek Blvd. to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 14-050 BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND n1IG. INC. FOR THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD TO MCCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN This Second Amendment to Agreement 14-050 between the City of Cupertino and MIG, INC., for reference dated April 16, 2018, is by and between the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and MIG, INC., a corporation ("Consultant") whose address is 800 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, California, 94710, and is made with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. On February 19, 2014, an agreement was entered into by and between City and Consultant (hereinafter "Agreement") for Consultant Services for the Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan. B. City and Consultant executed a First Amendment dated for reference May 19. 2014. modifying Paragraph 9, "Hold Harmless." C. The Agreement and the First Amendments are collectively referred to as the "Agreement" unless otherwise indicated. D. City and Consultant desire to modify the Agreement on the ten -ns and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between and undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is modified to read as follows: The term of this Agreement shall commence on February 19, 2014 and shall terminate on December 31, 2019, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein. 2. Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and covenants set forth in the Agreement shall remain the same and shall be in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this modification of Agreement to be executed. CONSYLTANT (� Title /p!/1 H G/ 1p RECO NDED O APPROVAL By Title RKIC Ir"oye.twnr City Project Stevens Creek Blvd. to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan Pagel of 2 CITY O5 CUP RTINO By VAL 1 " Title s /-" , wrcilW �. PLE, ME AT T: 1 City Clerk /©p - Consulting Services Agreement Amendment No. 2 EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION PO #2015-71 420-90-898 900-905 Original Contract: $425,000 Amendment #1: $0 Amendment #2: $0 Total: $425,000 City Project Stevens Creek Blvd. to McClellan Consulting Services Agreement Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan Page 2 of 2 Amendment No. 2 Client#: 2042 MOOREIACO ACORDr,.. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE YY) =5/02/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Dealey, Renton & Associates P. O. Box 12675 I CONTACT Jo Lusk ,NAME: PHONE 510 465-3090 FAX 51 Ext): A/c, No): 0 452-2193 E MAIC°' ADDRESS: jiusk@dealeyrenton.com Oakland, CA 94604-2675 510 465-3090 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: Travelers Indemnity Company 25658 INSURED INSURER B: Travelers Property Casualty Co 25674 MIG, Inc. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Co 27154 INSURER c : p Y 800 Hearst Ave. Berkeley, CA 94710 INSURER D: INSURER E INSURER F: MED EXP (Any one person) S110,000 COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDLSUBR'. 'WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD/YYYY POLICY EXP MM/D D/YYYY LIMITS _LTR A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y Y 16801H845960 08/31/2017 08/31/2018 EACHOCCURRENCE 51,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR PREMISES Ea RENTED S1,000,000 MED EXP (Any one person) S110,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY S1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY I X JECOT F LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OPAGG 52,000,000 S OTHER: B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y Y BA2tj258325 08/31/2017 08131/20 1 $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident 51,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) S X ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) S PROPERTY DAMAGE S Per accident X NON -OWNED HIREDAUTOS X AUTOS S B X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR CUPOH758762 08/31/2017 08/31/2018, EACH OCCURRENCE $IO 000,000 EXCESS LIAR CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE S10.000.000 DED 1 1 RETENTIONS ! S B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y / N OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N / A Y UB3JO40141 04/01/2017 08/31/2018 X ISTA U EORH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT x1,000,000 (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE S1,000,000 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 C Professional DPL710217 08/31/2017 08/31/2018 $2,000,000 per Claim Liability $4,000,000 Annl Aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Re: Agreement #14-050, PO #2015-71, Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan -City of Cupertino, its City Council, officers, officials, employees, agents, servants and volunteers are named as Additional Insured as respects General and Auto Liability as required per written contract or agreement. General Liability insurance is Primary/Non-Contributory per policy form wording. Insurance coverage includes Waiver of Subrogation per the attached. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 ACORD 25 (2014/01) 1 of 1 #S2316748/M2303446 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD PA1 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Policy Number: 6801H845960 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED (ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART The following is added to SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED: Any person or organization that you agree in a "written contract requiring insurance" to include as an additional insured on this Coverage Part, but: a. Only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal injury"; and b. If, and only to the extent that, the injury or damage is caused by acts or omissions of you or your subcontractor in the performance of "your work" to which the "written contract requiring insurance" applies, or in connection with premises owned by or rented to you. The person or organization does not qualify as an additional insured: c. With respect to the independent acts or omis- sions of such person or organization; or d. For "bodily injury", "property damage" or "per- sonal injury" for which such person or organi- zation has assumed liability in a contract or agreement. The insurance provided to such additional insured is limited as follows: e. This insurance does not apply on any basis to any person or organization for which cover- age as an additional insured specifically is added by another endorsement to this Cover- age Part. f. This insurance does not apply to the render- ing of or failure to render any "professional services". g. In the event that the Limits of Insurance of the Coverage Part shown in the Declarations ex- ceed the limits of liability required by the "writ- ten contract requiring insurance", the insur- ance provided to the additional insured shall be limited to the limits of liability required by that "written contract requiring insurance". This endorsement does not increase the lim- its of insurance described in Section III - Lim- its Of Insurance. h. This insurance does not apply to "bodily inju- ry" or "property damage" caused by "your work" and included in the "products - completed operations hazard" unless the "written contract requiring insurance" specifi- cally requires you to provide such coverage for that additional insured, and then the insur- ance provided to the additional insured ap- plies only to such "bodily injury" or "property damage" that occurs before the end of the pe- riod of time for which the "written contract re- quiring insurance" requires you to provide such'coverage or the end of the policy period, whichever is earlier. 2. The following is added to Paragraph 4.a. of SEC- TION IV - COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS: The insurance provided to the additional insured is excess over any valid and collectible other in- surance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the addi- tional insured for a loss we cover. However, if you specifically agree in the "written contract requiring insurance" that this insurance provided to the ad- ditional insured under this Coverage Part must apply on a primary basis or a primary and non- contributory basis, this insurance is primary to other insurance available to the additional insured which covers that person or organizations as a named insured for such loss, and we will not share with the other insurance, provided that: (1) The "bodily injury" or "property damage" for which coverage is sought occurs; and (2) The "personal injury" for which coverage is sought arises out of an offense committed; after you have signed that "written contract requir- ing insurance". But this insurance provided to the additional insured still is excess over valid and CG D3 81 09 15 © 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY collectible other insurance, whether primary, ex- cess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the additional insured when that per- son or organization is an additional insured under any other insurance. 3. The following is added to Paragraph 8., Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us, of SECTION IV - COMMERCIAL GENERAL LI- ABILITY CONDITIONS: We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization because of payments we make for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal injury" arising out of "your work" performed by you, or on your behalf, done under a "written contract requiring insurance" with that person or organization. We waive this right only where you have agreed to do so as part of the "written contract requiring insurance" with such person or organization signed by you be- fore, and in effect when, the "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurs, or the "personal injury" offense is committed. 4. The following definition is added to the DEFINI- TIONS Section: "Written contract requiring insurance" means that part of any written contract under which you are required to include a person or organization as an additional insured on this Coverage Part, provid- ed that the "bodily injury" and "property damage" occurs and the "personal injury" is caused by an offense committed: a. After you have signed that written contract; b. While that part of the written contract is in ef- fect; and c. Before the end of the policy period. Page 2 of 2 © 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. CG D3 81 09 15 Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission POLICY NUMBER: BA2G258325 COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 20 48 10 13 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. DESIGNATED INSURED FOR COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by this endorsement. This endorsement identifies person(s) or organization(s) who are "insureds" for Covered Autos Liability Coverage under the Who Is An Insured provision of the Coverage Form. This endorsement does not alter coverage provided in the Coverage Form. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Named Insured: MIG, Inc. Endorsement Effective Date: 08/312017 SCHEDULE Name Of Person(s) Or Organization(s): Re: Agreement #14-050, PO #2015-71, Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan - NAME OF ADDITIONAL INSURED PERSON(S) OR ORGANIZATION(S), CONT.: City of Cupertino, its City Council, officers, officials, employees, agents, servants and volunteers. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. Each person or organization shown in the Schedule is an "insured" for Covered Autos Liability Coverage, but only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an "insured" under the Who Is An Insured provision contained in Paragraph A.1. of Section II — Covered Autos Liability Coverage in the Business Auto and Motor Carrier Coverage Forms and Paragraph D.2. of Section I — Covered Autos Coverages of the Auto Dealers Coverage Form. CA 20 48 10 13 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2011 Page 1 of 1 BA2G258325 COMMERCIAL AUTO THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM The following replaces Paragraph A.5., Transfer of required of you by a written contract executed Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us, of the prior to any "accident" or "loss", provided that the CONDITIONS Section: "accident" or "loss" arises out of the operations 5. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Oth- contemplated by such contract. The waiver ap- ers To Us plies only to the person or organization desig- We waive any right of recovery we may have nated in such contract. against any person or organization to the extent CA T3 40 02 15 © 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission. TRAVELERS WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WC 00 03 13 (00) -- POLICY NUMBER: uB3J040141 WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit any one not named in the Schedule. SCHEDULE DESIGNATED PERSON: DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: Cityofcupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Agreement #14-050, PO #2015-71, Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan - PERSOP DATE OF ISSUE: 04/01/2017 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE�CITY OF CUPERTINO AND MIG. INC. FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR.THE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD -TO MCCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN. This First Amendment. to the Agreement between the City of Cupertino and:MIG INC.,. for reference dated May 19, 2014, is by and between. the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and MIG INC., a California corporation,("Consultant") whose address is 800 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, California 94710, and is made with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. On February 19,. 2014, .an agreement was entered into by and between City and Consultant (hereinafter "Agreement") for Consultant Services for the. Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch PreserveCorridor Master Plan. B. Cityland Consultant desire to modify the Agreement on,the terms,and conditions set, forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, itis mutually agreed. by and between and undersigned parties a$' follows: 1. Paragraph 9 "Hold Harmless" of the Agreement is modified to be replaced with the following language:and to read,as follows: A. indemnity Obligations Subject to_CiviLCode Section'2782.8. 1. Where the law establishes a standard of care for Consultant's professional services, and to the extent the. Consultant breaches or fails to meet such established standard of care, or isi alleged to have bxeached or failed to meet such standard of care, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect. to, all services performed in connection with the Agreement, indemnify, defend, I and hold harmless the. City and its,officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability;, claims,, actions, causes. ol: action or demands whatsoever against any of them,. including any injury to or death of any person or damage to property or other liability of any nature, that arise 'ou of, pertain to; or relate to the negligence, recklessness,. or willful misconduct of Consultant or Consultant's employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees,of litigation. Consultant shall not be obligated under this Agreement to indemnify City to the extent that -the damage is caused by the:sole�or active negligence or willful misconduct of City, its agents or employees. 2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant has no duty to provide,or to pay for an up -front defense against unproven claims or allegations; but shall pay or reimburse the City for its reasonable attorneys' ;fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs -and fees of litigation to theextent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or. its employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. However, the Consultant 'shall provide its immediate and -active: cooperation and assistance to the City, at no -additional cost to -the City, in analyzing, defending, and resolving`such claims. B. Claims for Other Lim. For all liabilities other than those included within, paragraph -A. ^above,: Consultant;shall, to the fullest extent: allowed by law, indemnify, defend, and -hold harmless the. City and its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers against any and all liability, claims; °actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever from and against any of them,. including any injury to or death of .any person or damage to property or other liability of any°nature, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the performance of this Agreement by Consultant o"r 'Consultant's employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such, costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City'schoice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. Consu_ ltant.shaIl not be obligated under this Agreement to indemnify City to the extent that the :damage is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of City, its agents or employees. C. Claims involving intellectual property. In addition to the obligations set forth in (A) and (B) above, Consultant shall indemnify, defend',,and hold the.City, its•elected and appointed officers, employees,i`and volunteers, harmless from and against -any Claim in ;which a'violation of ifitellectual property rights, including but not limited to copyright or patent rights, is allegedthat arises out of, pertains to, or relates to Consultant's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct under this Agreement. 'Such costs -and expenses4shall include; reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and.all other costs and fees of litigation.. 2. Except as expressly modified herein, all other - terms and covenants set forth in the Agreement.shall remain the same. and shall be in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the parties hereto have caused this modification of Agreement to be executed. CONSULTA MIG.INC. TitleT"! ; dtK:l- Date CITY OF CUPERTINO A,Municipal Corporation By— �rb Carol Atwood Title: Director ofYarks and -Recreation Data 5 f By, AS TO FORM: City Attorney ATTEST: By:(� Grace Schmidt; City Clerk - - -.j, -- - - i � l AGRI FOR CC 1➢C" 'OF S CREEK BOULEV TO MCCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN THIS AGREEMENT, for reference dated February 19, 2014, is by and between CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and MIG INC., a California corporation, whose address is 800 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, California 94710 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the Constitution and the statutes of the State of California and the Cupertino Municipal Code. B. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and C. City and Consultant desire to enter into an agreement for a total amount not to exceed FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($425,000) upon the terms and conditions herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM: The term of this Agreement shall commence on February 19, 2014, and shall terminate on June 30, 2016, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: Consultant shall perform each and every service set forth in Exhibit A, according to the project schedule set forth in Exhibit B. Consultant's Project Manager to represent consultant during the day-to-day work on the Project is Laurie Matthews. Consultant's Project Manager shall have supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress, and execution of the Services. If circumstances cause the substitution of the project director, project coordinator, or any other key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute project director and the assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior written approval of the City. Consultant, at City's request, also agrees to promptly remove personnel who City finds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner. 3. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT: Consultant shall be compensated for services performed pursuant to this Agreement in the amounts set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Payment shall be made by checks drawn on the treasury of the City, to be taken from the 420-9153-7014 fund. r Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to the City in accordance with the provisions set forth in Exhibit B. 4. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Consultant and City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Agreement. 5. STANDARD OF CARE: Consultant agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be perfonned by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City nor have any contractual relationship with City. 6. INDEPENDENT PARTIES: City and Consultant intend that the relationship between them created by this Agreement is that of employer -independent contractor. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the control cf Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Agreement. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Consultant's services. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees, including but not limited to, unemployment insurance; workers' compensation plans, vacation and sick . leave are available from City to Consultant, its employees or agents. Deductions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any fees due Consultant. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Consultant. 7. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IBCA): Consultant assumes any and all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of his/her employees performing work hereunder, pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Consultant. 8. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Consistent with City's policy that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable employer/employee conduct, Consultant agrees that harassment or discrimination directed toward a job applicant, a City e-mployee, or a citizen by Consultant or Consultant's employee or subcontractor on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, disability, marital status, pregnancy, sex, age, or sexual orientation will not be tolerated. Consultant agrees that any and all violations of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 9. HOLD HARMLESS: Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to all services performed in connection with the Agreement, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against any of them, including any injury to or death of any person or damage to property or other liability of any nature, whether physical, emotional, consequential or otherwise, arising out, pertaining to, or related to the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or Consultant's employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. 10. INSURANCE: On or before the commencement of the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with paragraphs 10A, B, C, D and E. Such certificates, which do not limit Consultant's indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement: "Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the City of Cupertino by certified mail, Attention: City Manager." It is agreed that Consultant shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Agreement all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Agreement with an insurance company that: is acceptable to City and licensed to do insurance business in the State of California. Endorsements naming the City as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates. A. COVERAGE: Consultant shall maintain the following insurance coverage: (1) Workers' Compensation: Statutory coverage as required by the State of California. (2) Liability: Commercial general liability coverage in the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury: 3;`_•00,000 each occurrence 3;1,000,000 aggregate - all other Property Damage: $100,000 each occurrence $2.50,000 aggregate If submitted, combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amounts of $1,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits shown above. (3) Automotive: Comprehensive automotive liability coverage in the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury: $500,000 each occurrence Property Damage: 3: 100,000 each occurrence or Combined Single Limit:: $500,000 each occurrence (4) Professional Liability: M Professional liability insurance which includes coverage for the professional acts, errors and omissions of Consultant in the amount of at least $1,000,000. B. SUBROGATION WAIVER: Consultant agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which he/she has agreed to provide comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance, Consultant shall look solely to his/her insurance for recovery. Consultant hereby grants to City, on behalf of any insurer providing comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance to either Consultant or City with respect to the services of Consultant herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said Consultant may acquire against City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. C. FAILURE TO SECURE: If Consultant at any time during the tern hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in the Consultant's name or as an agent of the Consultant and shall be compensated by the Consultant for the costs of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed frorn the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid. D. ADDITIONAL INSURED: City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees and volunteers shall be named as an additional insured under all insurance coverages, except any professional liability insurance, required by this Agreement. The naming of an additional insured shall not affect any recovery to which such additional insured would be entitled under this policy if not named .as such additional insured. An additional insured named herein shall not be held liable for any premium, deductible portion of any loss, or expense of any nature on this policy or any extension thereof. Any other insurance held by an additional insured shall not be required to contribute anything toward any loss or expense covered by the insurance provided by this policy.. E. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Consultant. Consultant is advised to confer with Consultant's insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Consultant. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Consultant warrants that it is not a conflict of interest for Consultant to perform the services required by this Agreement. Consultant may be required to fill out a conflict of interest form if the services provided under this Agreement require Consultant to make certain governmental decisions or serve in a staff capacity as defined in Title 2, Division 6, Section 18700 of the California Code of Regulations. 12. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS: Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for money by Consultant from City under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. Written notice of such assigmnent shall be promptly furnished to City by Consultant. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant, if Consultant is a partnership or joint venture or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power of the corporation. 13. SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL: Unless prior written consent from City is obtained, only those people and subcontractors whose names and resumes are attached to this Agreement shall be used in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant may change or add subcontractors only with the prior written approval of City. In the event that Consultant employs subcontractors, such subcontractors shall be required to furnish proof of workers' compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general, automobile and professional liability insurance in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Consultant. In addition, any work or services subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each provision of this Agreement. 14. PERMITS AND LICENSES: Consultant, at his/her sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all appropriate permits, ce►ti'ficates and licenses including, but not limited to, a City Business License, that may be required in connection with the performance of services hereunder. 15. REPORTS: A. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record and other document, hereinafter collectively referred to as "Report", reproduced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement, shall be the exclusive property of City. Consultant shall not copyright any Report required by this Agreement and shall execute appropriate documents to assign to City the copyright to Reports created pursuant to this Agreement. Any Report, information and data acquired or required by this Agreement shall become the property of City, and all. publication rights are reserved to City. Consultant may retain a copy of any report furnished to the City pursuant to this Agreement. B. All Reports prepared by Consultant may be used by City in execution or implementation of: (1) The original Project for which Consultant was hired; (2) Completion of the original Project by others; (3) Subsequent additions to the original project; and/or (4) Other City projects as appropriate. C. Consultant shall, at such time and in such form as City may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services required under this Agreement. D. All Reports required to be provided by this Agreement shall be printed on recycled paper. All Reports shall be copied on both sides of the paper except for one original, which shall be single sided. E. No Report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available to any individual or organization by Consultant without prior approval by City. If such Reports are reused by City for any purpose other than that for which such Reports were originally prepared, or if City causes such Reports to be altered without Consultant's written consent, such reuse shall be at City's risk. 16. RECORDS: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to pen -nit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to such books and records to the representatives of City or its designees at all proper times, and gives City the right to examine and audit same, and to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be; maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. If supplemental examination or audit of the records is necessary due to concerns raised by City's preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City's supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of contract or failure to act in good faith, then Consultant shall reimburse City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit. 17. NOTICES: All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at: City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino CA 95014 Attention: Carol Atwood, Director of Parks and Recreation All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at: MIG, Inc. 815 SW 2nd Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Attention: Laurie Matthews 18. TERMINATION: In the event Consultant fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions hereof at. the time and in the manner required hereunder, Consultant shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within the time specified after receipt by Consultant from City of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, City may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the Consultant written notice thereof. City shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving seven (7) days' prior written notice to Consultant as provided herein. Upon termination of this Agreement„ each party shall pay to the other party that portion of compensation specified in this Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the effective date of tennination. 19. COMPLIANCES: Consultant shall comply with all state or federal laws and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by City. 20. CONFLICT OF LAW: This Agreement shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of California excepting any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Agreement and obligations of the parties are subject to all valid laws, orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Agreement (or the successors of those authorities.) Any suits brought pursuant to this Agreement shall be filed with the courts of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. 21. ADVERTISEMENT: Consultant shall not post, exhibit, display or allow to be posted, exhibited, displayed any signs, advertising, show bills, lithographs, posters or cards of any kind pertaining to the services performed under this Agreement unless prior written approval has been secured from City to do otherwise. 22. WAIVER: A waiver by City of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character. 22. INTEGRATED CONTRACT: This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Consultant. 23. INSERTED PROVISIONS: Each provision and clause required by law to be inserted into the Agreement shall be deemed to be enacted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though each were included herein. If through mistake or otherwise, any such provision is not inserted or is not correctly inserted, the Agreement shall be amended to make such insertion on application by either party. 24. CAPTIONS: The captions in this Agreement are i.'or convenience only, are not a part of the Agreement and in no way affect, limit or amplify the terms or provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the Agreement to be executed. CONSULTANT CITY OF CUPERTINO MIG, Inc A Municipal Corporation By .V 13y 4A!�� Title Nu� CdU Title Director, Parks and Recreation Date 3 - -/Y Date: .3 - 2-9 -1 q I:ECOM1vMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Davi 'Brandt, City Manager J PPE AS TO FORM: I3y Carol Korade, City Attorney ATTEST` By: Grace Schmidt, City Clerk ,,� EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 420-9153-7014 $425,000 PO # jg7 0 Exhibit A City of Cupertino Department of Parks and Recreation Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Ranch Preserve Corridor Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report Scope of Work. MARCH 14, 2014 PHASE 1: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS During Phase 1, our team will develop an opportunities and constraints analysis that addresses the corridor and its context, incorporating community input, as well as the team's technical insights. We will also commence the public engagement process, developing the Public Engagement Plan as one of the first steps in the process. The first TAG and MPAC meetings, stakeholder interviews and focus groups will occur in this phase, and the community intercepts will be scheduled. Project management will begin, and will include a weekly conference call with the Cupertino project manager or project management team to ensure the project remains on track. We will develop base maps using the best available site data. Our team members will also participate in a full-day site inventory and analysis session, and we will meet in the field with key staff such as the golf pro and Cupertino parks maintenance and pool staff. We! will coordinate with the ADA Transition Plan survey team to incorporate findings from that effort related to ADA compliance and accessibility. The MIG Team will analyze the existing conditions information gathered from City and other data and its own examination of the site. MIG will pay particularly, close attention to circulation and access, infrastructure and utilities, environmental and natural features, topography and drainage, existing park uses, parking, neighboring land uses, and cultural and historic features. In addition to preparing the site analysis maps and illustrations, MIG will prepare an opportunities and constraints report that will be suitable for incorporation into the site master plan document prepared in Phase 4. The opportunities and constraints report will present the site analysis; describe the context, including site's history; provide a baseline financial assessment of the operation of the parks within the corridor; and review the capacity of the site to address recreation needs and trends (which will be further explored in Phase 2). The Corridor Plan and EIR will be integrated. Standards and guidelines for the Corridor Plan will be deliberately crafted to mitigate potential impacts evaluated in the EIR. To the extent feasible, the Corridor Plan will be a "self -mitigating" document. This proactive, integrated approach will minimize the need for PLANN I NG I DESIG'N`l COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 800 hears: Avenue * Berkeley, C :fornia 9 710 • USA. • 510.8'45,7549 ,rt-ww.migc'nm.com Offices in: D v;., Fug iertor. & P.asaefena, CA • Eugene & Portland, 0JR R;r.1ei0^, INC external mitigation measures, will streamline future CEQA review for future individual developments and public works projects, and will allow the City to monitor the effectiveness of the Corridor Plan. The EIR process includes several tasks that are described below. The budget ranges are based on our experience with other EIRs of similar size and scope. The scope and budget will be refined with City staff. It is assumed that City staff will provide recent CEQA and other environmental documents, and that one staff member will be assigned as the EIR contact. Deliverables: For all deliverables, MIG will provide a . pdf format version of the report to Cupertino for distribution and review, and will revise it based on one set of juried and consolidated comments. Task 1.1: Project Initiation Meeting MIG will begin the project with a project initiation meeting with Cupertino key staff to exchange information, refine the project schedules, discuss the public involvement process including tools and responsibilities, and identify preferred communication methods and information flow for the master planning component of the project. This will be scheduled to coincide with the Field Tour. Task 1.2: Draft and Final Public Engagement Plan As part of the final project scoping and project initiation, the MIG Team will work with Cupertino to develop a draft and final Public Engagement Plan identifying target audiences, methodologies, responsibilities and timelines for all aspects of the community and stakeholder involvement process. This will include an online and social media strategy that is customized to Cupertino to take advantage of existing online tools and networks, including establishing a project webpage on the Cupertino website (similar to the established Stevens Creek pages). MIG's ability to harness the power of existing social networks, both online and traditional, will extend the reach of the project and engage more people in the process. Task 1.3: Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Meetings (3) A technical advisory group (TAG) including representation from across Cupertino and potentially staff from other agencies, such as Santa Clara County or the A1idPeninsula Open Space District, will meet monthly throughout the project. At key points in the process, -the MIG Team will meet with this group to solicit feedback on work products and seek guidance on plan development, including aligning projects with other efforts and potential funding streams. Meetings will tie held via conference call or video conferencing unless they are scheduled to coincide with another in-person meeting. The first TAG Meeting will be in-person. Task 1.4: Additional TAG Coordination and Public Engagement This task includes additional coordination with the TAG and key City of Cupertino staff regarding public engagement elements, technical studies, and work products. Task 1.5: Stakeholder Interviews (16) & Focus Groups (3) Stakeholder interviews are one-on-one sessions with key informants, allowing for in-depth discussion. This methodology provides a means for interviewees to address potentially sensitive topics more candidly than they might in an open forum. We recommend stakeholder interviews with each of the existing user groups, as well as with those who have been especially vocal about this corridor or issues such as recreation, historic preservation or the environment. Focus groups organized around key topics provide an opportunity to hear specific viewpoints on needs and issues. This methodology is an effective tool for engagement of P LAN N I N G ( DESIGN I COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 800 Kea, Avenue • Berkeley, California 9.710 • USA 510.845.75419 vvvv.rniac0m.c0m O fir„es in; Davis, ru :ert.an & Pasadena, CA. • _ucgene & Perti.and, ,:;,P R,aleig:6, Nit: immediate neighbors early in the process, as well as with interest groups (e.g., trails advocates, natural resource advocates, historic preservation advocates, recreation user groups) Task 1.6` Community Intercepts (2) Community intercepts take the process out to the community, with a booth and interactive display boards at popular community events or well -visited locations. We intercept people in places and at activities they are already attending, attracting a broader population than a more traditional planning meeting. This method can be used within the parks in the corridor, but we also recommend conducting intercepts at other popular locations in Cupertino that attract target populations. We have successfully engaged people at farmer's markets, libraries, schools and shopping centers, as well as at parks and special events. Additional community intercepts can be staffed by the MIG Team, Cupertino staff or even volunteers, using materials and easy-to-use reporting procedures developed by MIG. Task 1.7: Base Map Using the available base data from Cupertino, MIG will develop a base map of the project site, assembling the relevant information on the project site and the surrounding area, including circulation, land use, project area conditions and other information as appropriate. Task 1.8: Field Tour and Site Analysis Mapping MIG will tour the site, make field notes, take photos, and begin to evaluate the opportunities and constraints. Cupertino staff and any invited stakeholders will join the MIG team during a portion of the site tour. This information will feed into the. base map and the site analysis maps. Prior to conducting the site visit, MIG biologists will review available background information pertaining to environmental resources in the vicinity of the project corridor to document potential sensitive habitats or special -status species that may occur in the vicinity of the Project corridor. Information that will be reviewed includes (but is not limited to): 1) the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of listed', proposed and candidate species that may occur in Santa Clara County; 2) the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Data base (CNDDB) list of listed, proposed, candidate or sensitive species that may occur in Santa Clara County; 3) the: USFWS National Wetland. Inventory data base; 4) local planning documents, including the Cupertino General Plan and Santa Clara Valley HCP; and 5) any previous biological studies prepared for the proposed project corridor study area and/or surrounding sites. Based on this search, a list of sensitive species with potential for occurrence within the project site will be generated. As indicated in discussions with City staff, MIG will use current available information and mapping from project corridor EIRs and will update to reflect current corridor conditions: MIG assumes that no extensive baseline field mapping effort will be necessary for this task. Following the review of existing biological data and regulatory information, MIG will conduct a general biological site survey'to confirm presence or absence of conditions identified in the desktop analysis, to include habitat,that may be present on-site and identify any sensitive biological resources that may be subject to local, state or federal regulations. The project site will be assessed using standard survey technique; primarily line transects and spot checking, for potential habitat for special -status species. The field survey will serve to document and map existing plant communities and wildlife habitat within the PL A N N T N G I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIONS I M .A NAG E M- E N' T I TECHNOLOGY 800 Hears A,ve.,.e • Berk-p1e1, Ca"for,r:i:a 94710 • t.P&A • 510,.845.754 r4 c.:r,i7 om.c:a;r:, Offices i,n: Dav's, Pu' ertor & Pasadena., CA & Portland, OR • Raleigh., NC proposed Project corridor, and the potential for occurrence of special -status species and important biological resources. Plant communities and other potentially sensitive biological resources may be mapped using Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) or digitized from field maps into ArcGIS 10. Plant and animal species observed on-site during the survey will be recorded, and representative site photographs will be taken during the survey. The field survey will also serve to update/verify the limits of natural resource mapping and information associated with background document/data base review. Task 1.9: EIR Baseline Traffic Study: Data Collection & Field Observations Fehr & Peers will begin their portion of the EIR process by collecting traffic data and observing field conditions. In order to establish a traffic baseline in the surrounding area, which is largely residential, they will conduct tube counts on roadways near the park sites and intersection turning movement counts at major intersections along the access routes to the plan area. Due to the understanding that trips passing through the neighborhoods near the project site are of concern to the community, they will collect 7 -day tube counts at the following locations to better understand neighborhood traffic patterns: Byrne Avenue between Almaden Avenue and San Fernando Avenue Byrne Avenue between Alcazar Avenue and San Fernando Avenue San Fernando Avenue east of Byrne Avenue (Blackberry Farm driveway) Fehr & Peers will also count vehicle turning movement, pedestrian, and bicycle volumes for the morning (6:30 AM -9:30 AM) and evening (4:00 PM -7:00 PM) peak traffic periods at the following study intersections: Byrne Avenue/McClellan Road Orange Avenue/Stevens Creek Boulevard Phar Lap Drive -Golf Course driveway/Stevens Creek Boulevard Finally, Fehr & Peers will perform field observations Df the project site, surrounding neighborhoods and intersections noted above during the peak periods to, establish data on current traffic patterns, queuing and safety issues. Task 1.1'0: Opportunities and Constraints Analysis MIG will analyze the existing conditions information (lathered from Cupertino and its own examination of the site. MIG will pay particularly close attention to circulation and access, infrastructure, environmental and natural features, riparian characteristics, topography and drainage, water resources, and neighboring land use. Following the review of existing information and site reconnaissance, MIG will prepare a Biological Resources Report that documents the potential for sensitive biological resources to occur in the Project corridor, such as those considered sensitive under CEQA (that may result in significant impact) or those subject to regulation by a resource agency, requiring a permit or other formal authorization for project - related impacts. The report will include a discussion of methods and results of.the literature review and field reconnaissance. A thorough description of the biological setting of the site and surrounding area will also be included, describing the vegetation communities, wildlife (including potential movement/migration P- L A N N I. N G I D E S I G, N I COMMUNICATIONS I 'M . ANA :G E M ENT 1 TECHNOLOGY 8''0 Hearst Avenue • Berke:le.y, ; a:iforr.ia 94710 • U'S -A • 510,8a5.754 • rw.u.m p:.om.cn 0, ffice's in: Dav .., 'Fuerton 8 Pass ide.na, CA • ._::rgen.e & Por-tland, 0R Pala -i , NC corridors), special status species, sensitive natural communities, and potentially jurisdictional waters and wetlands. The reportwill provide an evaluation of the potential use of the site by special status species, based upon the suitability of the habitats present and/or the site's proximity to any known records uncovered in the database search. If any sensitive species are observed, they will be reported in the findings. Any riparian areas along Stevens Creek or other sensitive habitat areas will be described and mapped if present. Other biological regulatory issues will be addressed, including designated critical habitat for federally listed species, local wetland and riparian stream ordinances, native tree ordinances, and the potential presence of jurisdictional habitat features. An assessment of project impacts and recommended mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for potential adverse impacts to sensitive habitats and species will also be included in the report. The evaluation of potential project impacts will follow the checklist items from Appendix G of the CEQA guidelines and will be prepared in a format suitable to submit with any future regulatory application packages. In addition, a map of plant communities and any sensitive biological features on-site will be developed in ArcGIS10 that depicts the approximate extent of on-site resources within the project area. The Biological Resources Report will include a discussion of constraints associated with the proposed project alignment, including plant communities and wildlife habitat, potentially jurisdictional features, and potential for occurrence of special -status plant and wildlife species that may be located within the Project corridor. Once the constraints have been identified, MIG will present this information to the project team to assist with developing a project strategy that avoids or minimizes adverse impacts. Task 1.11: Technical Memo Summarizing Findings and Recommendations MIG will prepare a technical memo highlighting the opportunities and constraints findings and recommendations that will be suitable for incorporation into the site master plan document. The opportunities and constraints document will present the site analysis, describe,the context including the site's history and past uses, outline the role of the park in relation to the Cupertino park system, and review applicable regulations and the status of existing agreements with site uses. Task 1.12: Public Information Update Cupertino has established project webpages for Stevens Creek and for several Parks and Recreation Department projects. We recommend establishing a page on the City of Cupertino site for the Corridor Master Plan. Throughout the project, MIG will prepare public information updates to keep the community informed about progress on the master plan, including opportunities for public comment and public input. These updates will be suitable for all of Cupertino's communication media, including project webpage updates, Facebook posts, tweets, press releases/media articles, and newsletter updates. Task 1.1.3: Project Management and Coordination (3 months) This task includes regular teleconference calls to coordinate project activities, discuss project direction and findings, and provide updates. It also includes invoicing, schedule and budget management, and similar activities. Level of effort based on up to 12 teleconferences, 1 hour per teleconference PLANNI NG 11 DESIGN, I COMMU,NICAT.I ONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 800 He.?' ^s. Ave'nue + Be. kelay, Ca Jornia 94710 USA • 51,0.815.7549 • wxvw..tnigcom.t:orn O`ffice's in: Dav;s, Fu[ arton & Fasadena; -A ^uOene 8e Pcrtl;nnid, O'R • Raleigh, NIC Vision project accounting monitoring and invoicing Supplemental email communication PHASE 2: NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT In thesecondphase, the MIG Team will conduct a needs assessment to identify potential program elements and then develop alternatives for'the corridor. The Mapita Interactive Online Survey will be conducted in this phase, and will allow the public to weigh in on both the corridor specifically and recreation needs in general. The TAG and MPAC will meet during this phase to review the needs assessment and preliminary design program. The MIG Team will conduct a demographic and trends analysis that will identify demographic trends in Cupertino; discuss recreation trends locally, regionally and nationally; and the implications for Cupertino. This will become part of the Needs Assessment. The Needs Assessment will build on the Comprehensive Plan standards regarding acreage of parkland and distance to parks by addressing recreation activities and the facilities to support them. The Needs Assessment will look at needs citywide, and will be consistent with assessment methodologies MIG employs in the parks and recreation system planning work the firm does around the country. Golf needs will be addressed specifically as part of this effort. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan policies and directions will be critically evaluated in light of trends and needs. The MIG Team will then develop a preliminary base design program and menu of potential program elements for the corridor, drawing from the Needs Assessment and the Opportunities & Constraints Analysis. The design program will be documented in a memo, and be crafted to explore potential trade-offs associated with each element. This will be refined with input from the TAG and MPAC. Using the refined design program, the MIG Team will facilitate a half-day charrette with key Cupertino staff to develop at least three alternatives for the corridor. The alternatives will be crafted in a manner to illustrate trade-offs and key decision points, including potential CEQA triggers. One alternative might emphasize certain resources or activities over others. One might push the program boundaries in one direction or another. At this stage of design development, concepts will be quick sketch, loose, and diagrammatic. Image boards will be created for each design to design character and potential materials. MIG's CEQA specialist will be a participant in this charrette, and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative from a CEQA perspective. The outputs of the charrette will be refined by the MIG Team for presentation to the community and will include advantages and disadvantages and order of magnitude costs for each alternative. The alternatives will be reviewed with the public in the first'interactive public workshop, and this opportunity will be extended online as described in the engagement strategy. r Deliverables: For all deliverables, MIG will provide a . pdf format version of the report to Cupertino for distribution and review, and will revise it based on one set of juried and consolidated comments. Task 2.1: Mapita Interactive Online Survey PLAN N I NG I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIO WS I MANAGEMENT I TECH NOLOGY 800 Hearst Avenue • PS'er+keiaY, C a:;fornia 94710 • ()S.A: • 510.84'5.7549-,Nwvi..rni9com carr Offices in. Davos, Ful'�rtor. & Pasadena., CA uaene &Pcrtiand., (OR Ralaigi., NC: MIG proposes using the highest quality interactive mapping solution available. The Mapita system provides a robust and user-friendly way for the public to provide specific, place -based input that feeds directly into the GIS data set and base map. This is an open access online survey, which gives all interested parties a voice in the planning process, allowing people to participate at their convenience. Through the public engagement plan and social media strategy, we will drive participation and interest. The resulting spatially linked input about community desires, priorities and important activities will inform the opportunities and constraints analysis, needs assessment and development of alternatives. Task 2.2: Demographic and Recreation Trends Analysis MIG will analyze Cupertino's current demographics and demographic projections, identifying those trends with relevance to recreation needs. MIG will also analyze local, regional, statewide and national trends in recreation, in light of demographic trends and projections, discussing those trends with relevance to Cupertino's recreation services. This information will be incorporated into the Needs Assessment document. Task 2.3: Needs Assessment Based on the background analysis and public and staff input during Phases 1 and 2, the MIG Team will design a customized analysis of recreation needs in Cupertino, looking at citywide needs. The methodology for assessing needs will incorporate findings from the public involvement process, the existing level of service, trends, and geographical analysis. It will also include a critical review of Cupertino's General Plan policies for recreation. Specific assessments will be conducted of golf, sports fields of different types, and swimming pool needs. As part of this task, MIG will build a network model of the City detailing actual access points and travel routes to parks and recreation sites. This model will allow the planning team to evaluate access using ArcGIS Network AnalystT"". The geographic service reach will consider all ways that park users actually travel to park land of different types, functions or characters, including walking, cycling, by car, and using the existing transportation networks. Additional layers of information in this analysis include the capacity of Cupertino's parks to support additional activities, as well as the capacity of land and facilities owned by other entities, such as schools or other providers. Special consideration will be given to proposed trails and their impact on access to existing parks. A service area for each site will be depicted graphically, highlighting gaps. Building Cupertino's reality into this model allows decisions to be made to optimize the system for the activities and services targets most important to the community. All documentation of the analysis will be provided in electronic formats that aria accessible to staff and MPAC/TAG members for review (Word, pdf, Google Earth KMZ). Task 2.4: Preliminary Design Program Based on the results of Phase I, MIG will prepare a rnemo outlining preliminary corridor site programming options. This will incorporate design program information and parameters from existing constituents; potential industry specifications; and additional potential uses for the site. This memo will also address adjacency and setback issues, as well as land use and environmental constraints that may affect the location of program elements. Task 2.5: Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Meetings (3) PLAN N I N G i DESIGN I C O M M U N I G A T I O N S I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 800 Hears; Aven ie • Berkeley, Ca ifo=i=.i:a 94710, USA. • 510,845.7549 • ori, v.€niq oir.ccar:; r,ffi,ces n: Dav-., Fu!.artor & Pasadena, rid gene & Pcrdarid, OR • R:ale,i h, NC TAG will meet with MIG once per month during this phase and focus on review of and feedback on the needs assessment and preliminary design program. Meetings will be held via conference call or video conferencing unless they are scheduled to coincide with another in-person meeting. Task 2.6: Parks and Recreation Commission Update MIG will meet with the Parks and Recreation Commission to provide an update on key aspects of Phase 1 including what we've learned from the Public Engagement Process, Technical Studies, and Opportunities and Constraints Analysis. MIG will solicit feedback frorn the Commission regarding the project and its direction in anticipation of the Alternatives Development and Public Workshop. Task 2.7: Refined Design Program After the preliminary site program options memo is circulated for review and comment by City staff and key stakeholders,, MIG in consultation with the City will further define and quantify types of uses, program activities and events anticipated for the park and identify additional community and/or citywide needs that may be met on this site. Task 2.8: Alternatives Gharrette & Development MIG will hold an internal alternatives development workshop with the MIG Team and key Cupertino staff. This session will result in the preliminary alternatives that will be vetted with the public. Two to three alternatives will be developed. Following the charrette, the MIG Team will further develop each alternative to a level suitable for public review, including identifying order of magnitude capital and operating costs for each and CEQA implications. Task 29: Interactive Public Workshop #1 The MIG Team will design and facilitate interactive and participatory community workshops. The first workshop will include hands-on activities to help define the preferred alternative, likely using MIG's Turning Point keypad polling system. Task 2.10: Online Public Workshop #1 We plan to extend each workshop by providing a follow-up online version, lasting for approximately two weeks. As with the workshops being conducted for the MIG -led General Plan Amendment effort, we anticipate working with City Channel to film the workshop presentations. These will be posted, and workshop activities will be made available online to allow for expanded participation. Task 2.11 Public Information Update MIG will provide a second set of updates, suitable for all of Cupertino's communication media, including project webpage updates, Facebook posts, tweets, press releases/media articles, and newsletter updates. Task 2.12: Project Management and Coordination (3 months) This task includes regular teleconference calls to coordinate project activities, discuss project direction and findings, and provide updates. It also includes invoicing, schedule and budget management, and similar activities. Level of effort based on up to 12 teleconferences, 1 hour per teleconference Vision project accounting monitoring and invoicing PLAN N I NG I DESIGN I COMMU NI:CATION:S I MANAGEMENT I TE"CH NOLOGY 800 Hea s>t Ay,e .'.e + Be-keley, California 9,1710 + 11S,A • 510.$415.7549 • ,ferw.m;.grom.eca.n Offices in: Davis, Fu?.ertor. & Pa5ader:a, CA • 'Eugene & Portland, -OR 2aleian, NC Supplemental email communication PHASE 3: MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT During Phase 3, the MIG Team will develop a single preferred concept with planning level costs for major elements. It is likely that the preferred concept will incorporate some elements from each of the three alternatives. The preferred concept will be based on feedback from the public, as well as the TAG and MPAC. The Team will attend a meeting to update the: Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council on the process to date and obtain feedback. The Team will then refine the illustrative materials; develop draft recommendations on programming, phasing, and implementation; and prepare an interactive cost model that will factor in cost escalation and allow for dynamic cost comparisons of different phasing alternatives. The MIG Team will also prepare a memo describing potential funding and implementation strategies. All of this material will form the elements of the draft Master Plan. The TAG and MPAC will meet again to review the draft. The Team will facilitate a second public workshop and companion online workshop to obtain feedback on the master plan elements, including priorities and phasing. Deliverables: For all deliverables, MIG will provide a . pdf format version of the report to Cupertino for distribution and review, and will revise it based on one set of juried and consolidated comments. Task 3.1: Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Meeting MIG will present the public feedback on the. alternatives, and get direction from the TAG about elements that should be included in the preferred alternative. This meeting will be held via conference call or video conferencing unless it can be scheduled to coincide with another in-person meeting. Task 3.2: Additional TAG Coordination and Public Engagement This task includes additional coordination with the TAG and key City of Cupertino staff regarding the development of the master plan and public engagement elements. Task 3.3: Parks and Recreation Commission Update The MIG team will present information about the master plan project, focusing on the needs assessment and alternatives development, to the Parks and Recreation Commission for their feedback. Task 3.4: City Council Update The MIG team will present information about the master plan project, focusing on the needs assessment and alternatives development, to the City Council for their feedback. Task3.5: EIR —Notice of Preparation, Scoping Meeting MIG, in collaboration with City staff, will prepare a project description and CEQA Notice of Preparation (NOP). Because it has already been decided that an 1=1R will be prepared, a CEQA Initial Study (IS) is not required to be attached to the NOP. If the City desires an IS, MIG will prepare one. MIG will help the City compile the NOP distribution list, and it is assumed that City staff will distribute (mail and put online) the NOP. MIG will assist City staff in conducting the CEQA scoping meeting. PLAN N I NG: I D ESIGN ICOM MUN I C A T t O .N 'S I MANAG'EM'ENT I TECH NOLOGY 800 `fears' ;.venue • Berkeley, < ;.;fornix 941710 USA e 510.845.7543 • -rein w.mincom.ceam Office in Divi.- Puliarton & Pasadena, "A & Rortland, OR • Raleigh, NC Task 3:6: Preferred Alternative MIG will develop a Preferred Alternative of the site design, including a keyed site master plan and recommended elements image board based on feedback from the community, stakeholders, city staff, and elected officials. Task 3.7: Draft Recommendations Memo MIG will develop a draft of the Master Plan recommendations to correspond to the Preferred Alternative focusing on those items that are not easily illustrated, but are integral to the proposed master plan. Task 3.8: Funding and Implementation Options Memo The MIG Team will develop funding and implementation options, including identifying private, public, and partnership options for implementation, as well as grants, bonds and other possibilities. Economic impacts such as those addressing direct revenue generation identified in the implementation options, indirect revenue generation through tourism and visitor impacts, and efficiency in use of City resources will be examined. Task 3.9: Capital and Operations Cost Model MIG will develop an adaptable cost model that summarizes capital and maintenance costs associated with the master plan elements. This spreadsheet model will allow staff updates to reflect changing conditions and refined costs for elements. For this model, MIG will identify costs per element for capital development and for operations (park maintenance tasks, recreation staff and programming costs), as well as revenue assumptions. Task 3.10: Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Meeting MIG will focus on review of the work products of Tasks 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8. This meeting will be held via conference call or video conferencing unless it can be scheduled to coincide with another in-person meeting. Task 3.11: Public Open House A public open house will be scheduled and materials developed to provide the public with an opportunity to gather information and provide input about the direction of the planning and design process. Task 3.12: Public Information Update MIG will provide a third round of public information updates, suitable for use in all Cupertino's media. Task 3.13: Project Management and Coordination (3 months) This task includes regular teleconference calls to coordinate project activities, discuss project direction and findings, and provide updates. It also includes invoicing, schedule and budget management, and similar activities. Level of effort based on up to 12 teleconferences, 1 hour per teleconference • Vision project accounting monitoring and invoicing • Supplemental email communication PLANNING I D E S'1 G N I COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY Rnr:) Rears- Ave,h.je • Berkeley, C,:. ifornia 94710 • USA. • 510-84,5.7549 • Nw,.N_ ni,,).rom.c0-m Offices, in: Dav , Ful'ertor. & Pasadena, C—A ,...::gone & PorHand,, OR R,alei,gh, NC PHASE 4: PLAN REFINEMENT, EIR AND ADOPTION In Phase 4, the. MIG Team will develop a full draft of the master plan document, including recommendations on updates to the Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Team will also prepare a CEQA Initial Study Technical Memo to identify guidance on the scope of environmental review. A final TAG meeting will focus on technical implementation issues, including CEQA. The Team will present the draft master plan to the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council, and prepare an online comment form to facilitate tracking of public comments on the draft document. Based on feedback, the MIG Team will finalize the document and provide digital and hard copy project materials back to Cupertino. Deliverables: For all deliverables (except where otherwise noted), MIG will provide a .pdf format version of this report to Cupertino for distribution and review, arid will revise it based on one set of juried and consolidated comments. Task 4.1: Draft Master Plan Document (digital + 5 hard copies) MIG will develop a Draft Master Plan which will include a revised site design, recommended elements image board, draft narrative recommendations, public involvement summary, and selected portions of opportunities and constraints analysis and technical memos. The draft master plan will incorporate feedback from the community, stakeholders, city staff, and elected officials. Task 4.2: Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Meetings (3) The final TAG meetings will focus on review of the draft Master Plan document and discussion of the upcoming review process. Meetings will be held via conference call or video conferencing unless they are scheduled to coincide with another in-person meeting. Task 4.3: Online Comment Form MIG will prepare an online comment form to facilitate tracking of public comments on the draft document. These comments will be exported into an Excel file and provided to Cupertino staff with MIG's recommendations on how to respond to each comment. Task 4.4: Public Information Update MIG will provide a final public information update to Cupertino, following the protocols used throughout the project. Task 4.5: EIR Studies and Technical Reports Utilizing data and information gathered during the Task 1 field surveys and analysis, the MIG team will analyze the Proposed Corridor Master Plan to determine potential impacts to environmental resources as detailed in the CEQA Appendix G: Environmental Checklist. The MIG team will analyze the preferred alternative and up to two additional alternatives in addition to the no project alternative. The following outlines the scope of individual technical area analyses. PLANNING I D E 5 1 G, N` I COMMUNICATIONSI MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY 8'00 Hearst Avenue • Berkeley,, C a :fo.r-r.i.z3 94710 USA • 510.845.7549 • ,mss w.rnigr,nm.c+om Office.:, in Divls, Fuherton er Pasadena; ,-A • ;;gene & Pbr*..lana, OR Raleia^" NC Traffic: Using the data collected in Task 1 and visitor- information and parking data provided by MIG and the City, Fehr & Peers will estimate the number of net ne:w vehicle trips produced by the master plan. They will then compare this information to the City of Cupertino and Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) thresholds to determine if a more in depth traffic study is required. A trip distribution figure will be prepared to show the overall assignment of trips in the regional area. This distribution will be used to assign trips through the study intersections as identified during Phase 1. Based on the data collected, Fehr & Peers will conduct an isolated intersection operations analysis for the (3) intersections listed in Phase 1. The TRAFFIX software package will be used to analyze the intersections. If significant intersection level of service impacts are found per the VTA's TIA guidelines, mitigation measures will be developed for the study intersections to attempt to reduce the impacts to a less -than -significant level. Intersection analysis will be performed for Existing and Existing with Project conditions. They will factor the intersection volumes at the study intersections higher to produce future year analysis scenarios (Future Year without Project and Future Year with Project). They will also perform a qualitative assessment of the project's contribution to neighborhood cut through traffic, and perform a brief qualitative assessment of pedestrian and bicycle connections to the master plain area. Fehr & Peers will summarize the above work in a brief report and include supporting maps and graphics. The report'will be submitted to the MIG team and the City for comment. Air Quality and Climate Change: MIGI Hogle-Ireland will prepare an air quality analysis and climate change technical report using the latest.modeling software and techniques supported by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). Construction and demolition emissions of criteria pollutants will be quantified with the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) and daily emissions will be compared to SCAQMD significance thresholds for nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, and particulate matter. Long-term emissions of criteria pollutants associated with project mobile, operational, and area sources will also be modeled using CaIEEMod to be compared to the BAAQMD daily thresholds. The results will be summarized in a technical report for attachment to the Environmental Impact report. Noise: MIGI Hogle-Ireland will evaluate noise -sensitive receptors and other conditions in the project vicinity. The report will include screening of existing and future noise and vibration impacts under with and without project conditions for construction and operational components of the project. Traffic -related noise screening will be performed using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Look -Up Tables. Construction -related noise will be assessed using the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). The technical report is meantwo provide a screening analysis of potential operational impacts that are anticipated to be less than significant:. Additional modeling may be necessary if potentially significant impacts are identified and typical mitigation (e.g. construction of barriers) is not sufficient to mitigate. This task does not include short- or long-term noise monitoring. Biology: Using the information compiled for the Biological Resources Report, MIG will analyze the proposed Corridor Master Plan to determine potential impacts to biological resources. The evaluation will include direct and indirect impacts to common and special -status plant and animal species, vegetation PLAN N I NG I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIO NS I MA'NAGEMENT'I TECH NOL,OG,Y K"O, Hears> Avenue • Berkeley, Califorr6a 9471:0 • USA 510.845.7549 • Nwvv.rn;QCom.CoM Office rn: Davl`s., Fu'.ertor. & Pasadena, CA • r zgene & Poreland, .)R Raleigh., NC communities and trees, jurisdictional or otherwise sensitive habitats, wildlife movement corridors and other significant biological resources. MIG will evaluate the significance of the expected impacts based on an assessment of the overall biological value of the Plan Area and identified significance threshold criteria. MIG will evaluate the Plan's consistency with relevant plans, policies and regulations, and the General Plan. MIG will prepare the biological resources section for the EIR. As appropriate, the EIR will incorporate the findings of all biological documentation, and will include a discussion of the following: field survey methodologies and findings; characterization and extent of on-site vegetation communities; special -status plant or wildlife species occurring or potentially occurring within or near the Plan Area; opportunities Plan Area lands provide for wildlife movement to surrounding habitat; sensitive and/or jurisdictional habitats within or near the Plan Area; and the overall biological value of habitat within the designated Plan Area. The EIR will also describe direct and indirect impacts on biological resources resulting from the implementation of the Corridor Master Plan. The EIR will also include a cumulative impact analysis based on expected buildout of the General Plan. Measures to mitigate direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts will be provided. The EIR will incorporate maps from the Biological Resources Report to illustrate the location of documented occurrences of special -status species and of vegetation communities within areas proposed for development. Task 4.6: Administrative Draft Program EIR MIG will prepare an Administrative Draft Program EIR (ADEIR) that meets all CEQA requirements, with easy -to -read text, maps, and tables in a user-friendly format. The ADEIR will be comprehensive, straightforward, and jargon -free (CEQA terms will be defined in an introductory table). The ADEIR chapters will be organized according to the CEQA Guidelines (including the CEQA Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form) and City protocols. Each environmental topic chapter (aesthetics, air quality, biology, cultural resources, hydrology, public services, transportation, utilities, etc.) will include the following three sections: Environmental Setting, Regulatory Seating, and Impacts and Mitigation Measures. MIG will develop a set of impact significance thresholds for each environmental topic, based on the CEQA Guidelines and City standards. Adverse environmental impacts that meet or exceed these thresholds will be considered significant, and feasible mitigations will be identified, to the extent possible, to avoid or reduce the impacts to less -than -significant levels. Also, impacts will be characterized in terms of short- and long- term effects. The impact/mitigation analysis will be presented in a logical sequence and format that all readers can understand. Based on their relevance to the Corridor Plan, some environmental issues may be dismissed, with no further CEQA review required (e.g., mineral resources) while other issues (e.g., land use, transportation/traffic) will be discussed in the EIR in more detail than others. As mandated by CEQA, the EIR will provide comprehensive and essential information to the extent required to identify significant impacts and recommend feasible mitigation measures. The EIR will not be "padded" with irrelevant information. Task 4.7: Screencheck and Draft EIR PLANNING, I DESIGN I COMMUNICATIONS I MANAGEMENT I TECHNOLOGY &00 'Hearst. Avenue Bprk,ta3ay, Ca' fornix 9d71ki - USA • 510.845.7549 wvjkd.migcnrn.carn Offices in: Dav' Pty' erten :& Pasa t'ena, CA • Eugene g Poreland, CR • Raleigh, NC 4 Following receipt of comments from City staff on the ADEIR, MIG will incorporate revisions and prepare a Screencheck Draft EIR for final City review. MIG will then prepare the public release Draft EIR for public circulation, along with the associated public Notice of Completion/Availability. MIG assumes that the City will distribute the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse, responsible agencies, and interested agencies, organizations, and persons. As required by CEQA, the Draft EIR will require at least a 45 -day public review period. Task 4,8: EIR Responses to Comments/Final EIR/Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program/Notice of Determination In collaboration with City staff, MIG will respond to oral and written comments received during public review of the Draft EIR and include the responses in the Final EIR. The Final EIR also will include: (1) any necessary changes to the Draft EIR based on those responses; (2) the list of commenters; and (3) a summary of their comments. As required by CEQA, MIG will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and a Notice of Determination. Task 4.9: EIR Hearings (4) MIG will assist City staff at up to four (4) public hearings on the Final EIR, culminating in certification of the EIR. Task 4.10: Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting The MIG team will present information about the master plan project, focusing on the draft Master Plan, to the Parks and Recreation Commission for their feedback. Task 4.11: City Council Meeting The MIG team will present information about the master plan project, focusing on the draft Master Plan and EIR, to the City Council for their feedback. Task 4.12` Final Master Plan (digital + 15 hard copies) The MIG Team will incorporate changes from the public, the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the City Council based on consultation and direction from Cupertino staff to prepare the final plan and report. Task 4.13: Project Closeout [digital Files At the completion of the project MIG will return electronic and paper files and close out the accounting for the project. Project close-out and file delivery include:3 a download of resource files collected during the project. Task 4,14: Project Management (12 months) This task includes regular teleconference calls to coordinate project activities, discuss project direction and findings, and provide updates. It also includes invoicing, schedule and budget management, and similar activities. Note: the length and amount of teleconferences may be adjusted to accommodate the EIR. • Level of effort based on up to 18 teleconferences, 1 hour per teleconference • Vision project accounting monitoring and invoicing • Supplemental email communication PLANNINGis DESIGN I C 0 M M U N I C A T 1 0 N S I MA NA, ,G EM ENT I TECH N 0 L 0 G Y 8 `) Hea-s' Avenue Berkeley, Ca forria 94710 • USA • 510.8 5.7549 w-v,u.inigc�rn.con Offices in n^v.?<,, Ful srton & Pasadena, CA _Fugene & P:;,rtland, OR Raleich, NC Exhibit C e s t i m a t e d p r o j e c t c o s t CUPERTINO PARKS AND RECREATION I STEVENS CREEKBOULEVARD TO'MCCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN e s t i m a t e d p r o j e c t c o s t _..St to lly V_ _ _55_S2500000Id5 y 0 Addt -I TAG M t�q.2MIG5tH S2 800 IAddt IWok hop 2MIG,St H S5400• .. ........- :. ........... .......f CUPERTINO PARKS AND RECREATION I STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD TO MCCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN