The URL can be used to link to this page

DRC Summary 06-19-2014 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � ,. CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 C U P E RT 1 N O (408) 777-3308• FAX(408)777-3333•planninq(u�cupertino.org To: Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commissioners From: Gary Chao, Assistant Director of Community Development Date: June 24, 2014 Subj: REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE june 19, 2014 Chapter 19.12.170 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for Appeal of decisions made by the Design Review Committee 1. Application EXC-2014-01, Sal Pablo (Valero Service Station), 10002 N De Anza Blvd Description Sign Exception to allow LED signage on two existing fuel price ground signs Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0-0 vote. This is effective June 19, 2014. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on July 3, 2014. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of june 19, 2014 Resolution No(s). 319 Plan set 2. Application EXC-2014-05, Seema Shenvi, Prashanth Telang, 10445 Byrne Ave Description R1 Exception to allow a 10' combined first floor side yard setback where a 15' combined setback is required Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0-0 vote. This is effective June 19, 2014. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on July 3, 2014. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 19, 2014 Resolution No(s). 320 Plan set COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION , �. CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE •CUPERTINO,CA 95014-3255 C U P E RT I N O (408)777-3308 • FAX(408)777-3333 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. � Agenda Date:Tune 19,2014 Application no: EXC-2014-01 Applicant: Sal Pablo (Valero Service Station) Project Location: 10002 North De Anza Boulevard (APN 316-26-095) APPLICATION SUMMARY: Sign Exception(EXG2014-01) to allow LED signage on two existing fuel price ground signs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the application per the draft resolution. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation Commercial/Office/Residential Zoning Designation P (CG, Res)—Planned Development General Commercial and Residential S ecific Plan Heart of the Ci Existin Land Use Automobile service station (no chan e) Lot Size 19,602 s uare feet(.45 acres) Existing/Proposed ground signs Two Project Consistency with: General Plan Yes Zonin Yes, exce t for the si n exce tion re uest Environmental Review Cate oricall Exem t er Section 15302, Class 2 of CEQA BACKGROUND: Site Description The subject automobile service station property is located at the northeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard. To the north and east of the site are office uses; to the west and across De Anza Boulevard is an office use; to the south and across Stevens Creek Boulevard is a plaza and a mixed use commercial/residential building; and kitty-corner to the site is another automobile service station use. The nearest residence is within 140 feet of the project site's property line. EXC-2014-01 10002 North De Anza Boulevard June 19,2014 Page 2 PrTOr Sign Exception Approval �� - ; , , ' �/'T.:}r �_ f. � ` < +T— '�i � , �y�,�? �'� v,r On March 27, 2000, the -�� , � � _ . # ��; �a�� - �. .f^- f � � � k�_..: Planning Commission --� �� "�'`r ��° � ��° .�� ri � �� ,�; , a— r ��..�.,�,�� „ : � ��,,w, approved a Sign Exception �� .� . �`..._ �, � � �,. � . -W-+ �, �*+ � ; J",�., �- s' - (EXC-1999-14) on the site to �`;_�=� �� " '_ � � �-�` �� :- � � � M ` - �:� �, -� , .,, � >_�.°' - �r'��;- �� G allow two ground signs ��, .� ��; , � `.r, ; � .�� T.�n � ="�� : � � � Project.ite 4� � when one was allowed. The ' � �F � ' " >��= � � . . . 1� � � ° �, � 3 ��-�u,�, � ,s . � . , ., . � Planning Commission � � ' �� - #� .. $ !� .,� -�. ` •�� 1 �• i -.�� ;� „' =. � .. supported the additional `" �.. �� . � - ��". . .__.,, n�� , t:� w �,....� °F P� � �7 � � ' � � "�._ ��F� � r-..� . ( � ,�r �..e...s.....� sign for visibility purposes " ` � s t ��_.�� '�i �. � .� �� , � ��s�' !N �1., :� �,� � Y `;: �r �.ti. r e±� �� ' �r �'' a .`...__�.. i ` �' r ., ,;- . x �. � . ,;��y,;.� since there is a landmark � �°� '�-� �� -_ � '��' � � � "��"`' , '�'x" �' �� . . � : . � ��„i �,� �:_ ,r �„ � ,. �� '� �+� ,,� .�"�.�r�. � � easement at the corner of the �" � .� .� � '�:��, �> x� �'"`�"`-��"° ��-��-:��.-��.��-� � --� - �� - �� xe . � � . �� .�� . � r. . , Slte. . a.s- i�. �� ~ �°� �� '* - ,.�: J�....�.,� �'a � � ° '�� .. .�,..�`�l` ��'"��y- r � � �i � � v �y 17�# rr�i i �.' �� -.. * , . .:�a �.��. , .' � t� , J� ,d i.�, ;• i , a: V., r ' •_T' ! �� DISCUSSION: � ° - � � � , _ _.._ _ � , . a , z „ , ... _ , . � �.!'♦ y� �` � __--� � �. . r k' i�'.: '�i ; ��, " r'� � � # � t ' ~ � �-;�e..�.i � y, ` , Ma " �i ,.� Application request ,�;� �r ��' '��'"��'�� . �� .� �`�' � � �� + , x ..�, :,: "".,� s � ;: � �� . . � ` y r." The applicant, Sal Pablo, of �` y ' �' � " Sign Development Inc., Proj ect vicinity aerial representing the property owner, Dave Schalker, of Valero Service Station, is proposing to replace both sides of two existing ground signs along the Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevard frontages of the site. The existing internally illuminated sign cabinets would be replaced with new internally illuminated cabinets with light-emitting diode (LED) price numerals. A substantial portion of the background of the sign would be opaque in order to minimize glare. The existing cabinet and sign base dimensions would remain the same. The project requires a Sign Exception since the City's Sign Ordinance prohibits signs with directly visible light sources (Section 19.104.220 F) and requires changeable copy letters or numerals to be made of permanent sign and symbols or letters of high quality and durable materials (Table 19.104.180 B). The City's Municipal Code requires Design Review Committee review for all Sign Exception applications. LED Si�nage The City's Sign Ordinance does not specifically address exposed LED signage on fuel price ground signs given its relatively new implementation in other automobile service stations throughout the region. Under the current ordinance provisions, LED fuel price signage is not permitted since it has a directly visible light source and is not considered a permanent, durable material. The restrictions against directly visible light sources are intended to limit glare and distraction to motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and residents in the neighborhood. The requirement for high quality, durable material in changeable sign copy is intended to avoid unsightly, reduced quality signage that would diminish the City's aesthetic appearance. As part of the proposed project, the LED numerals would be equipped with an automatic brightness control that would be adjusted based on the ambient light condition, including a reduction in intensity by up to 90 percent. The cumulative illumination intensity of each sign would be within the 250 foot lamberts allowed by the City's Sign Ordinance. The signs differ from electronic readerboard signs in that they do not include periodically changing or animated messages. The proposed LED numerals EXC-2014-01 10002 North De Anza Boulevard June 19,2014 Page 3 would remain static, except for when the price of gasoline changes (typically once or twice per day). The conditions of approval for the project require the following in order to minimize glare and distractions to passersby: • Restrictions on illumination intensity (modeled after the City of San Jose's recently adopted programmable electronic sign regulations), and a requirement that the signs be turned off by 11:00 PM • Restrictions against animated messages • Utilization of automatic dimming technology to adjust brightness • Licensed lighting engineer testing and confirmation that the signs meet the illumination restrictions The primarily static LED numerals function similar to ` �'�� "µ' � ,� a,. the existing plastic numerals �� . ` �Y � � Ys t .... t�. : r ,-� � . in that they change depending �� '' � ��"` . •�-� �' �''- s�. � �.�r r� �� '`.�M i � W� . , ; :: ,.. , �� ?�� on fluctuations in fuel ricin �- � � �' -� ? � � '•_ �� ...:� � - p g• �-., � , .._ .� ,.� ��::a .. �"''� The LED numeral technology x � `�°,� ` ' � . _,,, ., *..;, , .. , . . � will enhance convenience by Y ` ' � 4 ( �� y��;�� . allowing service station ' ��a, �� . <��``°`��` s !�� ,� �� ..., tri operators to control fuel ' ; q ` g ' "' £ �"y� �� .,� � �-f.C,. ,� F��1 �i.t � - 4 s� � ..,�.� ,. prices remotely without e `� - '` �� `' A' q _� �:.< '� � �'"�� `� ; . �� _ . �r , . ' 'd' s�,: - "`3N��. � ��i�, �� d , Y .. .. _. . . ..'a�n ' � . -,. .., �4 e^ � _ k d � �-. having to manually change � �;.�,.�3 � w,-��- �t ' �. � . .�.,��. individual numerals. The LED �=" .:-- _,�.. _ ..� �--:_,. ,� _:: � ..w.�:w�,.� � . T,- �� ; . -� .�.. numerals feature crisp, energy � ��' � � �`' ,r�.� ;x ��.�,� � .._ �..^-__ �..._. ' `'' T�', � efficient illumination with N ,��:- -��.F�� = .. '`-"r-��`'�„'� --y�,,;'°= „-.- similar lighting intensity as �``".=" internally illuminated plastic �' �� , w � �� .� letters. The proposed Photo simulation of the proposed signs viewed from De Anza and Stevens Creek opaque background of the sign will further reduce light glare. Approval Findings Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project based on the following Sign Exception findings (Section 19.104.290): That the literal enforcement of the provisions of the Sign Ordinance will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit c�nd intent of the ordinance; The proposed signs are consistent with the intent of the Sign Ordinance in that they minimize glare and distraction to motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and neighborhood residents. The LED numerals function similar to the existing plastic numerals in that they change depending on fluctuations in fuel pricing. The lighting intensity will also be similar and has the ability to be reduced if deemed necessary by the City. EXG2014-01 10002 North De Anza Boulevard June 19,2014 Page 4 That the granting of an exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare;and The proposed signs will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The project includes automatic dimming technology to reduce glare and will not include animated messages. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed design regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose The project does not propose to add additional signage nor increase the size of the existing signs. Moreover, the strict application of the ordinance standards would not allow the LED technology that is currently being used in other service stations throughout the region. The illumination intensity and appearance of the signs address the intent of the City's Sign Ordinance since they would not create distractions nor impact the City's aesthetic appearance. OTHER DEPARTMENT/AGENCY REVIEW The City's Public Works Department and Building Division, the Santa Clara County Fire Department, and the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department reviewed the project and have no objections. OUTREACH/NOTICING The following table is a brief summary of the noticing done for this project: Notice of Public Hearin Site Notice&Le al Ad A enda • Site Signage • Posted on the City's official notice (14 days prior to the hearing) bulletin board (one week prior to the • Legal ad placed in newspaper hearing) (at least 10 days prior to the hearing) • Posted on the City of Cupertino's Web • 3 notices mailed to property owners site (one week prior to the hearing) adjacent to the project site (10 days prior to the hearin ) The City sent out notices to adjacent property owners. No comments were received at the time of staff report production. PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 — 65964). T'he City has complied with the deadlines found in the Permit Streamlining Act. Project Received:January 7, 2014 Deemed Complete:June 9, 2014 The City has 60 days (until August 9, 2014) to make a decision on the project since this project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA. The Design Review Committee's decision on this project is final unless appealed to the City Council within 14 calendar days of the decision. EXC-2014-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 319 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW LED SIGNAGE ON TWO EXISTING FUEL PRICE GROUND SIGNS LOCATED AT 10002 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD (APN 316-26-095) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2014-01 Applicant: Sal Pablo (Valero Service Station) Location: 10002 N. De Anza Boulevard (APN 316-26-095) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION: WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds as follows with regard to this application: a. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of the Sign Ordinance will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed signs are consistent with the intent of the Sign Ordinance in that they minimize glare and distraction to motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and neighborhood residents. The LED numerals function similar to the existing plastic numerals in that they change depending on fluctuations in fuel pricing. The lighting intensity will also be similar and has the ability to be reduced if deemed necessary by the City. b. That the granting of an exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The proposed signs will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The project includes automatic dimming technology to reduce glare and will not include animated messages. c. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed design regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. The project does not propose to add additional signage nor increase the size of the existing signs. Moreover, the strict application of the ordinance standards would not allow the LED technology that is currently being used in other service stations throughout the region. The illumination intensity and appearance of the signs address the intent of the City's Sign Ordinance since they would not create distractions nor impact the City's aesthetic appearance. Resolution No.319 EXC-2014-01 June 19,2014 Page-2- NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof, the application for a Sign Exception, Application no. EXC-2014-01, is hereby approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. EXC-2014-01 as set forth in the Minutes of Design Review Committee Meeting of June 19, 2014, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set received on May 7, 2014 entitled, "Valero, 10002 N. De Anza Blvd., Cupertino, CA 95014," drawn by Sign Development Inc., consisting of 4 sheets labeled 1, 2, 3, and PID- 1; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROjECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. EXCEPTION APPROVAL A Sign Exception is hereby granted to allow LED gasoline price signage and a new background to replace the existing sign faces on two existing ground signs at an existing automobile service station. The color of the LED numerals shall be red, and the background shall be black. 4. ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING SIGNS The following enhancements are required for both existing ground signs: a. Paint the stucco and frame portion a muted earth tone color compatible with the building color. b. Insta115" high address numerals on both sides of the sign. c. Add additional landscaping at the base of the signs as determined appropriate by the Director of Community Development. The address numerals may be free of landscaping. d. The plastic "Car Wash" signage at the base of the signs shall be removed. 5. ILLUMINATION INTENSITY AND HOURS OF ILLUMINATION The intensity of each ground sign shall not exceed 250 foot-lamberts. All illuminated signs shall be turned off by 11:00 p.m. 6. LED SIGN REQUIREMENTS The following requirements shall apply to the LED fuel price signs: a. T`he signs shall not display animated messages, including flashing, blinking, fading, rolling, shading, dissolving, or any other effect that gives the appearance of movement. b. T'he signs shall not include any audio messages. Resolution No.319 EXC-2014-01 June 19,2014 Page-3- c. The signs shall utilize automatic dimming technology to adjust the brightness of the signs relative to ambient light so that at no time shall a sign exceed a brightness level of three-tenths foot candles above ambient light, as measured using a foot candle (Lux) meter aimed directly at the sign face at a distance of 100 feet from the sign. d. An ambient light measurement shall be taken using a foot candle meter at some point between the period of time between 30 minutes past sunset and 30 minutes before sunrise with the sign turned off to a black screen. e. Immediately following the ambient light measurement taken in the manner required above, an operating sign light measurement shall be taken with the sign turned on. f. T'he difference between the ambient light measurement and the operating sign light measurement shall be three tenths foot candles or less. g. The signs shall contain a default mechanism that will cause the sign to revert immediately to a black screen if the sign malfunctions. h. The LED copy may only contain fuel price numerals. i. The signs shall comply with Section 13532 of the State of California Business and Professions Code and all other State regulations regarding LED signage. 7. LIGHTING INTENSITY VERIFICATION Prior to final occu�anc� of sign permits, a licensed lighting engineer shall confirm that the lighting intensity is in compliance with the conditions of approval in this resolution. 8. SIGN EXCEPTION REVIEW/ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS If complaints are received related to the intensity of the LED signage under this Sign Exception, and the complaints are not addressed immediately by the property management, then the Design Review Committee or Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the Sign Exception at which time, the approval for LED signage may be modified or revoked. The City reserves the right to require additional measures to reduce lighting intensity if deemed necessary. 9. SIGN PERMITS REQUIRED The applicant shall consult with the City's Building Division to obtain the necessary sign permits for this project. 10. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall comply with the Temporary Sign regulations of the City's Sign Ordinance (Chapter 19.104 of the Municipal Code). A temporary sign permit is required for a 11 banners, a-frame or other freestanding signs (except those required by the State of California), and promotional devices. 11. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. Resolution No.319 EXC-2014-01 June 19,2014 Page-4- 12. INDEMNIFICATION To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this ordinance or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. 13. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactiCoons. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2014, at a regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee, Takahashi NOES: COMMISSIONERS:none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Gary Chao /s/Winnie Lee Gary Chao Winnie Lee, Chair Asst. Director of Community Development Design Review Committee � �� . � 4� J m Q N z w Q ENHANCE EXISTING L;�'�?�DSC:�T'ING ��. -v � � ..' �n; N; � `�----' --- ' BUILDING �! 1 �' ', .--�I - / , .^ / �,�`,. STEVENS CREEK ;._ � , �� , l 40�—0" CITF i�t .� �' N �, � � 3.,�,� �� .:% � �� -�-� � �. # ,,.,._. 4�- F . �, _..v�� w�.. ,Mi` A �{ � � fw � W�/ � � ;� t �� ,, � � _ � �. ,,�.. �k :� �� ,� ��. � � . � �.�.,,.. � � �� . ,, q,� _. � � �� - �. �6 „ Q � � „, �� y. � ,� �, �� . _ � ��,:� � � �`�`�� ..,�„ �aq(�pp, r �11 v��+„ �s� � � � _� �. ��* � � � � � � � ro ,a`� �,,. ��s��,,�a`� �x's'� E�rxi�A,��i�t�`,��'`'"��g; �. � � EXISTI�NG SITE �y. � . s��`��L ��-C`�UZG1�—L`I �. R,� �'4i,y3P �.'�i �5�.:} .. s „��r� � n ({"'',. ��_��. &+��: �.°s�<Y � E- .. .. _ � �, -_ �.,� ��r: ,�� ' �f �.,.��-�—. i:�� MAY � 7 2014 NIGHT VIEW � � v; � � � � � � 0 C SIDE :1 � 7�-U"'(EXISTING : • � ' � • . . �� { �. r� 3�� g �� ' � ��;� �� s� � � �'��[, �x^•'��.r�.�� c�;��!�'. ��:�� t �,�; r RE'.VIOVE EXISTING __ " CAR WASH LETTERS ~~'� � t=RO!�9 B.ASE � � i�s-ra�L;�Ew s��Fco �� -- 100C12 ��. -� P�I�T ExISTING BasE ADDRESS NUMBER ' AND CABINET TO BOTH SIDES OF BASE �' ' MATCH EXISTING BUILDING � RE�FACE EXISTING DiF PRICE ID SIGN OI��LY EXISTING CABINET SIZE REMAINS THE SAME SIDE B ^ V z :; � � �r �' .... r-. � � 1 P��t n :, .. , r `-` r � : ..v .��x.tt!�.�� ._._ .� �� ;vALERl� �. �� ,� � �� .�� , �� PROPR/ETARY INFORMATION. The information disciosed in this document,including all drawings,designs and re/ated materials,is the vatuable and proprietary information of Sign Development Inc.lt is provided solely for the purpose of evaluation for purchase and,without the express written aufhorization of Sign Development Inc.,may not be disclosed or duplicated,in whole or in part,for any reason.Sign Deve/opment lnc.expressly reseives al/patent, copyr+ght and other proprietary rights to this document,including aN design,manufacturing,reproduction,use,and sales rights thereto.O 2011 SIGN DEVELOPMENT 1NC. SCALE: 3i8"=1'-0" �; Q �I.� w � V 1 z 0 O O � CUSTOMER APPROVAL SIGN AND PRINT FULL NAME DATE No. nn728o DATE: 10.24.13BA REV: 02.20.14BA _----,-�-'�+�►"'� � ,�;,� � - x � � ,� ,� � , � �h�.:�� + �'� �.T"" � � r � �� °�� ,��"�'. �, <:�' �,,, `i�< � .� '�'"� � � �,. �:.��. ;_, �.�_. ..�_ � ENHANCE EXIS1'ING LANDSCAPING � � .�� '�� x ,b- �� 3 .: ��: �� '� �:�.,. � ` �'r ��_��. � �r �:�� , �s e� �' EXISTING D/F PRIGE/ID SIGN PER THE S1G� ORDItiANCE, SIGN ILLUMI�;ATION SHALL BE TURNED OFF AT 11:OOPM OR WITHIN TWO HOURS AFTER THE BUSINESS IS CLOSED. WHICHEVER IS THE LATER TIME. ALL UNPERMITTED AND TEMPORARY SIGNS ON SITE MUST BE REMOVED PER THE SIGN ORDINANCE. � ��:�� .. C��o�� J,''. ..,:}..t� =`.F.,°}�81 � ��`' <{.� — � � ..4'+s E � v:��: v W ��3�:�f�,,,:�r PAGE: 2 OF 3 Sign Deve/opment lnc. License#576277 Upiand,CA 91 78b (904) 920-5535 VALE RQ 10002 N . DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NIGHT VIEW SIDE A K�-0"_(EXISTING) __ ��` ;�� f � � ��-�� x��` VALERt�� - � �� Valero Self Serv+e Gasoline �..�� ;�� CAR WASH I��sTaLL�Ew s��Fco ; - ----- 1�002 ADDRESS NUMBER BOTH SIDES OF BASE ' REMOVE EXISTING ----______ CAR WASH LETTERS FROM BASE 6'� RED LEDs -; PAII�'T EXISTING BASE ', AND CABINET'TO MATCH EXISTING BLJILDING � REFACE EXISTING DlF PRICE ID S1GI� ONLY SCALE: 3i8"==1'-0„ EXISTING CABINET SIZE REMAINS THE SAME C► � : 8'-0"(EXISTING __�� #�� . 'f "� ��`�� •x��l�, ; �� .� �� vn�E�o� � � �,�� ` lero Self Ser�e Gosoline �� CAR WASN PROPRIETARY/NFORMATtON. The information disclosed in this document,including ali drawings,desigRS and re/ated materia/s,is fhe valuable and proprietary information of Sign Development Inc./t is provided solely for the purpose of evaluation far purchase and,without tne express written authorization of Sign Development Inc.,may not be disclosed or duplicated,in whole or in part,for any reason.Sign Deve/opment lnc.expressly reserves all patent, copyright and other proprietary rights to this document,+nc/uding al�design,manufacturing,reproduction,use,and sales rights thereto.O 2011 SIGN DEVELOPMENT/NC. � 0 Vl W w � � z c L c � CUSTOMER APPROVAL SIGN AND PRINT FU�L NAME DATE No. nn72so DATE: 10.24.13BA REV: 02.20.14BA �.....�...� -- _ _ � �:�,�:�, " ' � ' � � .��..�q , __ ,. � �,„ , �,.. _ � ��"'��` ��.�.� �Z EXI�STING D/F PRICE/ID SI�GN PER THE SIGN ORDINANCE, SIGN ILLUMINATION SHALL BE TLRNED OFF AT 11:OOPM OR WITHIN TWO HOURS AFTER THE BUSINESS 1S CLOSED, Vl�'HICHEVER IS THE LATER T'IME. ALL UNPERMITTED AND TEMPORARY SIGNS ON SITE MUST BE REMOVED PER THE SIGN ORDINANCE. ��:3� E��-�i � -o i p ��i �j y� �i�.t:,.;:��it�� .�3f��S'�vi� r�� - lg- � � � ��i� � }.. �. � Z...s i �...5...5....:d �: _ .._ .,._._Y_�:..s�..= .� �_ . . _ :.��:� PAGE: 3 OF 3 Sign Deve/opment lnc. License#576277 Upland,CA 91 78b (909)920-5535 VAL E RO 10002 N . DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 '''� `Ni �x i i 3;'4"RADIUS ' MAX � , � � � , � , � � � ��----------------------- VALERO YELLOW(PANTONE 123C) VALERO TEAL(PANTONE 315C) ��HITE#7328 WHITE#7328 VALERO TEAL(PANTONE 31 SC) WH1TE#7328 VALERO YE�LLOW(PANTONE 123C) CHANGEABLE NUMERALS: WHITE COPY �ALERO TEAL BACKGROUND NOTE: DIESEL PRICE PODS-VALERO Y'ELLOW BACKGROUND AND CHANGEABLE VALERO TEAL NUMERALS 1 '�z'" 3i4" , ___` OR�„ _ � i ! 2 1,f4., 3�16' -__ MOLDED FACE CORNER SECTION PROPRIETARY/NFORMATtON. The information disciosed in this document,including aN drawings,designs and related materials,is the valuable and proprietary information of Sign Deve/opment Inc.It is provided solely for the purpose of evaluation for purchase and,without the express written authorization of Sign Development lnc.,may not be disciosed or dupticated,in whole or in parf,for any reason.Sign Developmenf Inc.expressly reserves al!patent, copyright and other proprietary rights to this document,including all design,manufacturing,reproduction,use,and saJes righfs thereto.O 2011 SIGN DEVELOPMENT 1NC. w Q � � w � r— � z O � 0 � � � � SIDE A 7'-0" �� : �` � $.,� ��,.�,�� ' t.,��,�� VALER � �� ... � Valero Setf Senne Q�li� � �"�� : ��` AR ASH � r.:�� ____-� � C :n � � � F- � s ' z � O � 0 � SIDE A � � 8'-0', :-�� ;� �� vn�E�o� �-� �� . �"�� Yalero Se1f Serv�e Gosoline � �.�� ;� �� :�� CAR WASH � � ,, ,�.;;r . :� OREFACE EXISTING D,F PRICE ID S1Gi� SCALE: 3i�"=1'-0" � REFACE EXISTING DiF PRICE ID S1GN SCALE: 3i8''=1'-0" REFACE/REPAINT EXISTING CABINET. CABINET CONSTRUCTION: ALL�MINliM ILLUMINATION/ELECTRICAL: STANDARD FLOURESCENT COOL WHITE HIGH OUTPUT INTERNAL ILLUMINATION, INTERNAL MAGNETEK BALLASTS (OR EQUAL), UL LABEL AND VISIBLE DISCONNECT SWITCH ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS TO BE UL LISTED AND APPROVED FACE MATERIALS: MOLDED HIGH IMPACT CLEAR ACRYLIC FACES W'ITH TR�NSLUCENT 3M VINYL SECOND SURFACE DECORATION FINISH SPECIFICATIONS: SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAII�'TED.RETAINERS, DIVIDER BARS, POLE AND BASE TO MATCH VALERO MOCKING BIRD DARK GRAY GENERAL.NOTE:ALL SIGNAGE TO BE MANUFACTLTRED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO LOCAL A��ID NATIONAL BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL CODES CUSTC�MER APPROVAL SIGN AND PRINT FULL NAME DATE �.,�' � ry��}��i. ---.,�,��,.�.��"��`f-"� � �r., .. f;f�� %t� � "��'�� _:z:;..:s � - ,;. -i.:, � , ,..� �� s�b��,s� A �.,.� �l'i :.�� No. nn728o DATE: 10.24.13BA REV: 02.20.14BA PAGE: PID-1 Sign Deve/opment lnc. License#576277 Upiand,CA 91 786 (909) 920-5535 V�L E RQ 10002 N . DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAI�FNING DIVISION . • CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE � CUPERTINO,CA 95014-3255 C U P E RT 1 N O (408)777-3308 � FAX(408)777-3333 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. _� Agenda Date:Tune 19, 2014 Application no: EXC-2014-05 Applicant: Seema Shenvi(Prashanth Telang) Proj ect Location: 10445 Byrne Avenue (APN 357-12-036) APPLICATION SUMMARY: R1 Exception (EXC-2014-05) to allow a 10-foot combined first floor side yard setback where a 15-foot combined setback is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the application per the draft resolution. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation Residential(0-4.4 DU/Gross Acre) Monta Vista Zoning Designation R1-7.5 (Sin le-Famil Residential, 7,500 s uare foot minimum lot size) Existing/Proposed Land One-story single-family residence Use Gross Lot Size 6,500 s uare feet Net Lot Size (after street 6,000 square feet dedication) Allowed/Required Proposed Lot coverage 50% of the net lot area 2,788 s uare feet(46%) Floor area ratio 45% of the net lot area 2,347 s uare feet(39%) Height Two stories, not exceedin 28' One stor , 17'S" First floor building Front- 20' Front-20' setbacks Side-15' combined (min. side 5') Side- 1O' cc�mbin��cj ��ith �' <�r7 e��ch side (exc. req.) Rear- 20' Rear-33' Proj ect Consistency with: General Plan Yes Zonin Yes, exce t for the setback exce tion re uest Environmental Review Cate oricall Exem t er Section 15303, Class 3 of CEQA EXC-2014-05 10445 Byrne Avenue June 19,2014 Page 2 BACKGROUND: Site Description . . . The sub�ect sing e- ami y . � ., ' '� ��a �g� ► } �' , V• �,�� w� �c :P �u s '� t',,� da�. F'�'�•3w: � «r ��.�.,, �.,'", �r �p�... .�,.�.,_,�_• �' : � ,�a °;-� residential property is located on �� ` � ` -� ,, � , �" �.� � , "�� .` "' 4 a�,:.�;�� ►� , -� �;�,.-. � r �=w�s�:�. °° the west side of Byrne Avenue �, , ,�., �; � _�` ��." � �� ,� � � , � � , =� �',.a� �; � ��, , � � �-�:�i , �► _ _„ . �.. x t: . . . " N „ , .. near polores Avenue. The ,, ,�� - � ,, ,�. �_ � �. �+�� , ! , property is surrounded on all ` ��' �� _� � �.'� �.�� _..�' A��. I;�� °�'.�� `; ��_.� � r �� .� �� , �--- � ° a,. � ��':��'rst� �r►�� + z sides b sin le-famil residences. �� . -� a� �'' - � �;°� ��` � Y g Y .�,� � � _ �.. �� ar� ��-_�-,,n�,Y'� '— — ,�.-.— . �.� �� ,, °�r,�. „ � �,�;, >��;. , � � �Project site �..�.'"''�""""�,y . , The existing one-story residence � � ._._._.,„ �� ;,_ ._, �- �� ` ' �. _ �. , � .� � �, . M was originally built under the , "�� .�-� � ��..� , , �` �� .�.�. , . ,. _ . . �� k=---��L�...�.��° ;_ �!�' �� . County of Santa Clara's ��, ��"""'�'� � �_ L�.`; ,� � � -�� k �� .� ,�+ ( �. �<..� r.�i��,� k � �� y� � � jurisdiction. The property was T �. � r ,�� '��,. ;:�� ` � �. ., . .� - . _.,, annexed into the City in 2004 '� �, .:' , �' ��' ,'k�'�`'i� ~� A�� "�' _ . ,. � ��=�-� �� _ - , "� .- � w - �.� .,��_...�� y � �� (Monta Vista). t � :;p�°�x �'�..� , �,.�,�� , _ ��,�.. x�}� ,�r � � 1 �y_�,. �j'� ��. � 6 x, i ,. � � j' � '• • ;• , ' ,�w,� .' ��,� . � •�' �"" . .. .r� �Yl�.''� . � � �� $>�� . . K'� +� . .r��._�.:7� �� 1 s , �l .� +ea. � _,., .- .. . � ' � �..., � . 6 9. 09 � The existing lot is substandard in � � �.� �,;�,�, ,�„�" �, � �� =� �;,,� � "��' size at 6,500 square feet (1,000 �• '�r ��4 �, � � �� "1� �` ' � �" � � � �� , _ w � i � ,- __ � � , ; ;. � r�`�,. � .,� � " �'' °" square feet less than the R1-7.5 �� ` � �- J 3'"'�'� '�" �'�` ��' zoning district minimum lot size Project vicinity aerial of 7,500 square feet) and substandard in width at 50 feet (10 feet less than the minimum lot width of 60 feet) with a depth of 130 feet. As a condition of the proposed project, the applicant will be required to dedicate the first 10 feet of the lot for the purpose of street widening and public improvements. The dedication will reduce the lot size to 6,000 square feet and depth to 120 feet. DISCUSSION: Application request The applicant, Seema Shenvi, representing the property owner, Prashanth Telang, is proposing to demolish the existing detached garage and storage room at the rear of the property, demolish a portion of the rear of the existing one-story single-family residence and construct a new 1,192 square foot first floor addition which includes a new two-car garage. The project requires an R1 Exception for the proposed five-foot first floor side yard setbacks on either side of the house. The City's Municipal Code requires Design Review Committee review for all R1 Exception applications. Side Yard Setback Exception The project site is located in the Monta Vista neighborhood where there are numerous lots that are substandard in width. Consequently, many of the neighboring homes have nonconforming side yard setbacks as well. The project is located in a R1-7.5 zone, which requires a combined 15 foot first floor side setback, with no side less than five feet from the property line [Section 19.28.070 (E)(2)(a) of the R1 Ordinance]. T`l1e R1 Ordinance only allows properties located in the R1-5 zoning district (Rancho � Rinconada neighborhood) to have minimum five-foot side yard setbacks on both sides. The intent of this regulation is to require greater side setbacks on larger and wider lots wit11 bigger homes while EXC-2014-05 10445 Byrne Avenue June 19,2014 Page 3 smaller and narrower lots may have lesser side yard setbacks, allowing more flexibility to construct a reasonable and balanced floor plan and front elevation. Given the project's lot constraints, the applicant is requesting the five-foot side yard setback exception only along the first half of the house in order to satisfy the two-car garage requirement and still have enough building area to balance the front elevation. Only the garage is proposed to encroach five feet into the south side setback. The rest of the house on the south side is setback at least 10 feet from the property line. Please refer to Attachment 1 for a map of R1-zoned Monta Vista residences with existing first floor side yard setbacks less than 15 feet combined. It is noted that some of these residences were built under the County of Santa Clara's jurisdiction with varying building setback and development parameters that are considered non-conforming under the City's requirements. However, there are seven recent first floor side yard setback exception approvals in the neighborhood to allow for five-foot first floor side yard setbacks on either side. One of these recent approvals is the neighboring residence to the south, where in 2005 the Design Review Committee approved a similar request for a 10-foot combined side yard setback, where the only the garage encroached into the setback. Staff supports the exception because the proposed house is consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood both in terms of massing and setbacks. In addition, the Design Review Committee has approved similar requests in the past. Project Design The proposed residence is -�-''�� -. _� ,--, ,� = � _.. designed to meet all aspects of _�;__�.._ _ ; � �°��^�� . ��.�� r�"_ '�' the R1 Ordinance, with the `��" '� 7 ! • '�- 1 h.� . � .._:_ . .,: .. -�. � � -- :\ '/'••- ...., :.� . . r exception of the first floor side ��-�� ` ' �. ^� -� r �--r , -_ � ,� Y" ..... . # .. _ .�., .._._ 'F � � . - � f �� r � ;-- ._�._ _.� � � � - � , yard setbacks being considered � � � -� � � �l r (' 4 ti �tg.�G �� ` .� ,:i by the Design Review � � � !�x�^�' �� I �'� ��` � � � - � �_.-�-�--.,. . Committee. PC�6PEG?iv�v;�w A��••�DiT;O�I�a�CMpccL_�.aM��V��HAMr�T'� 104�a�(Fr1E AVEI�G��P°f�I�.�LI/OF�J� ArMF�'�DA.Miiol N�M�7 App�roval Findings Staff recommends that the Perspective rendering Design Review Committee approve the project based on the following R1 Exception findings (Section 19.28.140 E): The literal enforcement of the R1 Ordinance will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chc�pter; The project is consistent with the intent of the R1 Ordinance in that it minimizes visual impacts to adjacent residential properties and that it is compatible witl� other homes in the neighborhood. The 5- foot side yard setbacks are appropriate in order to allow for a functional floor plan and a balanced front elevation on a substandard lot. The intent of the ordinance is addressed since the side yard setback exception requested is not for the entire length of the house—only for the garage. T`he rest of the house on the side requested for an exception is setback the required distance. EXG2014-05 10445 Byrne Avenue June 19,2014 Page 4 The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in tke area, nor be detrimental to the public safety, health, and welfare; The project will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The project is a one-story single-family residence that is consistent with others in the neighborhood. The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed design regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose;and Due to the substandard lot width and two-car garage requirement, the strict application of the prescribed side yard setback requirement would create a situation that would result in an unbalanced floor plan and front elevation. The intent of the ardinance is met since the exception would result in a house that is comparable in siting, scale, and massing as others in the neighborhood. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed from abutting properties The proposed project is consistent with other existing homes in the Monta Vista neighborhood. The granting of a side yard setback exception is not anticipated to create adverse visual impacts since it is only for the front portion of the residence, while the rest is setback the code-required distance. OUTREACH/NOTICING The following table is a brief summary of the noticing done for this project: Notice of Public Hearin Site Notice&Le al Ad Agenda • Site Signage • Posted on the City's official notice (14 days prior to the hearing) bulletin board (one week prior to the • Legal ad placed in newspaper hearing) (at least 10 days prior to the hearing) • Posted on the City of Cupertino's Web • 7 notices mailed to property owners site (one week prior to the hearing) adjacent to the project site (10 days prior to the hearin ) The City sent out notices to adjacent property owners. No comments were received at the time of staff report production. PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 — 65964). T'he City has complied with the deadlines found in the Permit Streamlining Act. Project Received: May 5, 2014 Deemed Complete:June 4, 2014 The City has 60 days (until August 4, 2014) to make a decision on the project since this project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA. The Design Review Committee's decision on this project is final unless appealed to the City Council within 14 calendar days of the decision. EXC-2014-05 10445 Byrne Avenue June 19,2014 Page 5 CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the project since the project and conditions of approval address all concerns related to the proposed project and all of the findings for approval of the proposed project, consistent with Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, may be made. Prepared by: George Schroeder, Associate Planner Approved by: Gary Chao, Assistant Director of Community Developme Attachments Draft Resolution Attachment 1:Monta Vista residences with reduced first floor side yard setbacks Plan Set EXC-2014-05 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 320 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTTNO APPROVING AN R1 EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A 10-FOOT COMBINED FIRST FLOOR SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE A 15-FOOT COMBINED SETBACK IS REQUIRED LOCATED AT 10445 BYRNE AVENUE (APN 357-12-036) SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2014-05 Applicant: Seema Shenvi (Prashanth Telang) Location: 10445 Byrne Avenue (APN 357-12-036) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR AN R1 EXCEPTION: WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for an R1 Exception as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds as follows with regard to this application: a. The literal enforcement of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter. The project is consistent with the intent of the R1 Ordinance in that it minimizes visual impacts to adjacent residential properties and that it is compatible with other homes in the neighborhood. The 5 foot side yard setbacks are appropriate in order to allow for a functional floor plan and a balanced front elevation on a substandard lot. The intent of the ordinance is addressed since the side yard setback exception requested is not for the entire length of the house—only for the garage. The rest of the house on the side requested for an exception is setback the required distance. b. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area,nor be detrimental to the public safety,health and welfare. The project will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The project is a one-story single family residence that is consfstent with others in the neighborhood. c. The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed design regulation and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. Due to the substandard lot width and two-car garage requirement, the strict application of the prescribed side yard setback requirement would create a situation that would result in an unbalanced floor plan and front elevation. The Resolution No.320 EXC-2014-05 June 19,2014 Page-2- intent of the ordinance is met since the exception would result in a house that is comparable in siting, scale, and massing as others in the neighborhood. d. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed from abutting properties. The proposed project is consistent with other existing homes in the Monta Vista neighborhood. The granting of a side yard setback exception is not anticipated to create adverse visual impacts since it is only for the front portion of the residence, while the rest is setback the code-required distance. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof, the application for an R1 Exception, Application no. EXC-2014-05, is hereby approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. EXC-2014-05 as set forth in the Minutes of Design Review Committee Meeting of June 19, 2014, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set received on May 5, 2014 entitled, "Addition and Remodel for Mr. Prashanth Telang, 10445 Byrne Ave., Cupertino, California," drawn by Seema Shenvi, consisting of 6 sheets labeled A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and A6;except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. EXCEPTION APPROVAL An R1 Exception is granted to allow a minimum combined first floor side yard setback of 10 feet (5 feet on either side) for the one-story single-family residence. The new two-car garage is the only structure that may encroach into the required 10-foot south side yard setback. The rest of the principal residence shall be setback at least 10 feet from the south side property line.. 4. DEMOLITION OF REAR DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE Approval is dependent on the demolition of the existing rear detached accessory structure(currently used as a garage and storage room) since it would put the project floor area ratio over the maximum 45% allowable. Alternative arrangements may be considered by the City if under the maxixnum FAR. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC WORKS CONFIRMATION FORM The project shall comply with the requirements indicated on the Public Works Confirmation form dated 12/19/2013, including, but not limited to, dedications, easements, off-site improvements, undergrounding of utilities, all necessary agreements, and utility installations/relocations as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works and required for public health and safety. The Public Works Resolution No.320 EXC-2014-05 June 19,2014 Page-3- Confirmation is a preliminary review, and is not an exhaustive review of the subject development. Additional requirements may be established and implemented during the construction permitting process. The project construction plans shall address these requirements with the construction permit submittal, and all required improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works prior to final occupancy. 6. GARAGE DIMENSION The minimum interior garage clearance shall be 20 feet by 20 feet(measured from interior walls). 7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 8. INDEMNIFICATION To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this ordinance or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. 9. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS,OR OTHER EXACTIONS T'he Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2014, at a regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee, Takahashi NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Gar�Chao /s/Winnie Lee Gary Chao Winnie Lee, Chair Asst. Director of Community Development Design Review Committee IEI!0 . IEi2t5' 50.0'PL � IE 1 Fence 6' 24.5' � . . � .._ ^ h�gh � . ... �_ .,:�.. / (NI Fence 6' �� .. .... "g" (E)Garage ( (N)Storage - �lei ca,c Z � (E)Store Room Hardsfape ro I ;.N o�� De removeA�. ... rQ P > � y IEI Ga�age and IEI � ��. � ��. 7.0' � . �. I. Store Room to be � - � Eemdised ��. . :e � . . . Concrete pad Io t4�� 7�6 - LanA Sa remain. .. ... . ........... ... . . � ��9 � to remain1 10.0' 26 2' � 5.0' Setback at New t � IEI Fence 6' MAition . .... i . + ...... . �gh � (NlDown z . . .._� ... , . ° spouts as N � -_..-. � �. ( i ;- . �ea�.ea � � i N ... . . i , ... ' . �p . . _ � �� + . O � � � (N)PorU . . C� Z . . . . . �.8.8'ta95 - . F v �� ..� . . . . . . � { . 0 > � i 0 g :New Addition I o . �. . .� - � . . . -••.l N 0 Existing O Sunroom � 12.0'�19.5' I (E)Fireplace to . -..� r � berertaveE � lo be demolised j{ �I'E)C� ':� �1 `o��,aY�o c i �,a„b„�� Existing House � ss.o�X ao.o• � !^ FL=360.6t N�R°°"e• m wde roof '- o 0 5 p� overhang i I 1 l ( (E�Fence 4' � Il � � . � ��hgh I �N�Fenca6' hgh I~ � (N)Garage m . .FL=360.1± Seat Height at : EI Gas Me�e� � �.� . . Cay window is I .� � � � � .� 24'above F�� . (N)200 Amps SuC panel 2 ' �-�_'.T'. . . . . _ . � . . � . � . i(NlPwch�.�j. .NewMdrti�n . .. �- 7Yx59Y .12.0'x4.4' -��;�j,� » . � i o � , °. _�--� � � � i ! 1. i�\ � � , p � Z , " . � Z � o � i ;< ,��a�...., ,�- . � � 'r.y� � o y , . � 6 ..��""s b .. . . .. (EI as ;. Z b m �� ; � . . . .��ne -•, . £ � � E �' , � �� , g ;. � i , n N , ` ; :� � + ° i ; `� b.J. I ;.;,`� _ � j �(E 1 Sewer , 3". _ . . �� ; �,�e 50.0'PL , , � E�� , � � �� '_I. _ --I � Z . i (E)Watar; iN�sa.wy. � N Street (1 �- � Me�er ... Bamcade R '�� (N)PLANTER / (N)Tempora i I m �� d ` STRIP / /V/ S�aewalk ry ° ` i ' � E - � �? , I -- -----' ---- --------- -- i . � I � '� k�N�5.0'Min (�/N�50' � SetDackto Garage BYRNE AVE. `� STREET (N) SITE PLAN N� SCALE: 1"=10' NOTE: 1. Contractor shall field locate existing sewer line and connection thereof. New Sewer line shall be provided as per codes and Local Agency's requirements.Contractor shall coordinate this construction with Local Agency. 2.See seperate drawings for drainage plans and details On site drainage to be directed through landscaping on the property and not onto neighboring properties. 3.Water mains to be relocated.Contractor to coordi�ate new location with Owner. 4.All(E)Trees shall remain. 5.The underside/soffit of Eaves 8 Gable end overhang within the 5'setback zone shall be1-hour rated. 6.(E)Water meter to be relocated.Contractor shall cordinate with City,San Jose Water Co.and ow�er. 7.(N)Utility lines shall be located underground.Contrcator shall coordinate with City,relevant utility companies.and Owner. 8. Finished floor level at(N)Addition to match(E)Finished floor level. 9. Intemal Dimensions of garage sahll be 20'x 20'min. PROJECT ANALYSIS: LOT SIZE = 6000 SQ FT Net Area Existing House = 1400 SQ FT Area of(E)House to =225 SQ FT be replaced by Garage (E)Garage = 245 SQ FT (to be demolished) (E)Front Porch = 62 SQ FT (to be demolished) (E)Enclosed Rear Porch = 234 SQ FT (to be demolished) (E)Storage Room = 321 SQ FT (to be demolished) New Addition(Rear) = 662.5 SQ FT New Addition(Front) = 53.0 SQ FT New Front Porch = 51.2 SQ FT New Rear Porch = 83.5 SQ FT New Garage = 447.3 SQ FT Existing Floor area = 2227 SQ FT Existing Lot Coverage = 2365 SQ FT New Living Space =1854.0 SQ FT Floor area w/roof ht = 30.0 SQ FT >16'from FFL Proposed Floor area =2346.7 SQ FT Total Lot Coverage = 2788.0 SQ FT = 46.5% Existing FAR = 37.2% New FAR = 39.2% Front Yard Paving = 465 SQ FT Front Yard Area = 1000 SQ FT Front Yard Paving Percentage = 46.5% Total Impervious Area (max) = 3000 S�FT Total Pervious Area (min) = 3000 SQ FT Impervious Area percentage = 50% DRAWING INDEX: �� SITE PLAN,PROJECT INFO - CONOITIONS OF APPROVAL � (E)FLOOR PLANS 8 ELEVATIONS, (N)FLOOR PLAN A3 (N)FLOOR AND(N)ROOF PLAN A4 (N)EAST&WEST ELEVATIONS A5 (N)NORTH&SOUTH ELEVATIONS A6 (N)SECTIONS C� COVER SHEET , C2 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP �il C3 STREETIMPROVMENT C4 GRADING&DRAINAGE -- SECTIONS - ELECTRICAL LAYOUT PLAN - TITLE 24 CERTIFICATION -- FOUNDATION PLAN AND DETAILS - ROOF PLAN AND DETAILS -- SECTIONS AND DETAILS r,:.a �tackbeny F'3r^, .•. ... {.i0�{�G�t2f.�',2 , �, �} .r' r f Lry�i��4�o`1i!ty^ ,.}� rtJf�CSfd•I�ttt �h��.�i �.M: . l; 'C'�` . ,y�. z\.i�. k' r,., aqp�.:;'� x`��' � �� -� �`;� f, :...Z j�r`L .'•;f.;' . � �C'?t�_�:� ,.Y_ .' _ �:rc=,a=,'- �� hc7Flfd'�15lA� t�or�h sch�xy)�` f��?Ct;.�41N •�. �: lituary et: �'i^fu yx�lt�u �6Cfie�F�46G[TiS '?.'� sr�d FE CN!ice L � .,(V�+?�?27 UW`D .. � �,:''�..�:...L� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SCOPE OF WORK Addition of 712 sq ft of living space,51.2 sq ft of front porch,83.5 sq ft of rear porch &447.3 sq ft garage Demolition of(E)Garage,(E)Storage,(E)Sunroom&(E)Fireplace Addition of 20'driveway. Upgrade of electric subpanel&relocation of watermeter. Remodel of(E)kitchen. 5'-0.S 29'-11.5' 1'-6' /--k 4 ir: 1-6 .. • 5�O . - _ b, �b: 6�6.5 16'10 5" • �� a, -� i.(N�Porch� � sas�n b 'v; 83.5 sq st area of Porch no!incl.in New AddiGon FAR '662.5;sq ft " � ��,, � 3�S'-0 Existing House 1129.6 sq ft A : 0 o ; _ - - __ ---- � , 5,_0.o ;., �5�_g:5-" 10'x 3'area w! heighl to boltom of � roof raflers greater , ,�� , than 16'-0" fn � (N)Ga�Og¢-,. (E)Lrving Area to � w m � qq.a s ry� �demdished ; � 7 4 _ . ,. ' N � . ,.,.. ,-, . . _. ... _.... �; : 'A. ir=o• ' �N�ao.on N�+nea�iur� .,..' � ,�"20'-9.5' �-29.1sqft . .�53.Osqfl�� O1: � . µ, _ �, �. , -_ _.._ _.__.. a o; � ...�_._._.� 1'-6' 19'-3.5' 1'!' 7'-2.5 1'-B" 1�'-6� t•-s- (N)FAR Calculation: 'a•s°�a,°a°"°.�, n t mcl.i FAR 78'roofoverhang incl.in ToWI Coverage calculalion. Seat Height at bay window is 24'above FfL. A/ea nol ind.in FAR PROJECT DATA: APN: 357-12-036 Property Address: 10445 Byme Ave. Cupertino,Ca-95014 Owners: Mr.Prashanth Telang (408r489-9711 Ms.Seema Shenvi (408)-460-9394 Zone: R1-7.5 Type of Construction: V-B Building Sprinkled: No Number of Stories: One CODE DATA PROPOSED ADDITION CBC 2013:Residential,Building,Eleclrical,Mechanical,Plumbing,Energy 8 Fire. CupeAino Municipal Code N � t�u�c-1=z �?TP.C^SLi=i� S<hrrl <?.4;, � ��<. ,��:�.. ...�.. . ..Y .�.��IVEI� t�AY4v2014 BY General Notes See(N)Floor and Roof plan on Sheet A3. See Topographic Map and Horizontal Control on Sheet C2. See Street Improvement details on Sheet C3. See Grading and Drainage on Sheet C4. �til`tR� l��/ $4+ilg�/Issue Date �'S �f G`t�.s�� SEEMA SHENVI 408-996-7456 SITE PLAN,PROJECT INFO ADDITION&REMODEL FOR Mr.PRASHANTH TELANG 10445 BYRNE AVE. CUPERTINO,CAUFORNIA-95014 Proi� $he�t ��Dec 2013 A 1 ScaN AS NOTED WALL LEGEND: ________= Existing wall to be removed. Existing 2 x4 @ 16"o.c. studwall to remain. New 2 x 4 studs @16"o.c.,UNO � � ..... ........ ....... ............... .. ....... ..... ....._._.... —�J liuMry . � . �.�-�M". 2 —`� I .....;i_._ _ .._._..___.._ _.._..._...... ._..._..._.._..._..._....._.. ZJ �- .....'....._, -� i �... ""' � �-.- .-.. oe� eca awm.z ' „"`\Bam a_i..� ,. .. � INIK ne �j"-.+. F ...J � Lvinq , BeCRwm�i :'__.._..._.._."_._____.._.._..._.._.._..._.._.._._..._.._......_..._.._.._..__...:� �✓ Gacn 9�� ;... IS'-5' . li]'.� (E) FLOOR PLAN � N Sun Room (E)Canposi�e rool m be reo�acea 12 ——— onrn < QX Z _—_ __ T.P. . . > C — « ~ � N Q T.O.S.F __—_ _ - _ 4'min to77 ma. (E)Stucm (E)Po.ch va"h"��"a (E)Home (E)FRONT/EAST ELEVATION IE)Compos�te�ooi �o ha.eoiacea �—t2 (E)MemD2ne rool d�pnch lo ce�eD�cea � � � � � � ie�s��«oF,��sn (E)Home (E)SIDE/S4UTH ELEVATION � � � I � . . ............ . .I......_._.._....... : _ _ _, � (NlPoecn �', � aosn (N)BaE qmm�I � r ;=�- ,. L -Ll �..... �� «.,. B.�n . ' �.... � _ . . :'. F '° � '"_""".."""""'_."__ � � '� � ^ ' , .... , ! . JOl =-- Ll INI Oiniy � - (R�KiIyYiCr � ; .•. . .. .._....� (EIBeEROOme1 'i �. � ..— ...—.Y.�_:_J .., � .w a �., - : � .a . ; �,e : ; �\ , � :.�M... .. . . - ' . .. ',; � � E +�y - � : . . . �r�.:. G :�._.�_.._..'�_ F � - - ) . . rao � , y ...�. (p�LHnq . : .'...__..__.__.__._._...x-.MIfir+Y_..._.��.._ �� . .�" .ua ; '. ; ' : - .a�,.s.-f. �:._ .......,�.._... ...: ; , ' . INlfriaqe �. �� . . ��` . . . , . ' (N�Farc� • , �_ _ - - - -- _ . ; m o , (N) FLOOR PLAN � N Note:Plan shows walls to be demolished.SeeSheet A3 for(N)Floor Plan dimensions and details. ___ X i T.P___ > a� jY w «i �U io Q � T O.S.F a•m��roi z-ma: veMy�sne % ___ � ———T.P. — ' a > __T_O.S.F._ ��•mintotYma. verily at si�e 8 EnA � A� (E) Existirg (N) New PL Property Line Jt NumDer/POUnd B D- Board BOT. Bohom BRZ. Braize Cl Center line os�. oa,ae DE7 Dataa D.F. pouglas tir D.H. DouGle hung DIA. Diameler DIM Dimension DN. DOWfI DR.. Door D.S. Down spou[ D.W. Dish washer DWG. Drawing E. East EA. Each e.J. Expansion ELEC. Elec�nc ELEV. Elevation E.S. Each side E.J. Expansion E�. EQual EQUIP. Epuipment EXIST. F�csisting EXT. Exzterior ABBREVIATIONS F.A.U. Faced air unil MECH. Mechanical F.D. Flowdrain MFG. Manufacturer F.F fbor(inish M.H. Manhole F.G. FixeA glass MIN. Minimum FIN. Finish MISC. Miscellaneous FJ. Fborpist MTL. Metal FLR. Floor N. North F.O.0 Face of concrete N.I.C. Not in conirad F.O.S. Face of stud NOM. Nominal FTG. Fooling N T.S. Nol lo School FURR. Furnng OI Over FX. Fixed O.C. On cen�er GA. Gauqe OPP. Opposi�e GALV. Galvanized PL. Plate G.C. Geeneral Contractor PIVWD. PtywooO G.I. GalvanrzeA Iron PNL. Panel GL. Glass PR. Pair GR. GraAe PT. Paint GVP. Gypsum QTV. Quantiry H.D. Holddown R. Riser HDR. HeaAer REF. Reference HDR. Hardware REF. Refrige2ta HGR. Hanger RE�'D. Required HORIZ. Hori2ontal RM. Room H.S. Horizontal sliding R.O. Rough openirg I.G. Insulated glass R.R. Roof raflers INSUL. Insulatio� RWD. Redwood INT. Interior S. South J.H. .bist hanger SCHED. ScheduleA JT. Jdnt SECT. Section MAX. Maximum S.G.D. Sliding glass door M.C. Medicine caDinet S.H. Singk hung (E)Membrane rool lo Ge repbced tz (E)�^wa�e�oor Mcn 4 to be repiaced � � (E)Firepxe (E)Stucco (E)Sun Room ro Ee denrolished o is (E)Home (E)REAR/WEST ELEVATION (E)Composite roo( to be replaced 12 p:lCh 4 (E)MemDrarre rad � lo Ce rBDUCeC ._� � � � . (E)Home �E�s��m F��sn (E)SIDE/NORTH ELEVATION SHT $I�e¢t SIM. Sirtwlar SL Sld�ng SPEC. Specfcauon SQ. Square 5.7 Sun Nnnel STD. SlarWarO STOR. Storage STUR. S�ucWral T Tread T.B. Towelbar TEL. Telephone TEXT. Tezlured T.8 B Top arb Donom T.8 G Tongue aM groove THK Th�ck T.O.C. Top o�curC T.R. Towel Ring NP. Typiwl T P.H. Tdlet Daper hd0er U.N.O. Unless noled othervnse W. Wes� W� Wilh W�C. Wa[errJose� W.P. Wate�prool W P. Wall paper �.. . . ,hj.A..� �� . �_ . . ��_.�C.—.,.,��l�—�S � . _ 4�� €�. .�:� _..._ _ ._ l� �1�-��.� _ : ..._..,a —� T_: " �_d...�.,. ._._..__............�......_ .,.�.__-,......�..,� o.,.... W ��:_:�i�: �f (E�Sun Room To Oe demol�sheC General Notes I i I See(N)Floor and Roof plans on Sheet A3. �, See Notes and Specifications on Sheet--. 'i Revision/Issue I Date � I SEEMA SHENVI 408-996-7456 (E)FLOOR PLANS 8 E�EVATIONS (N)FLOOR PLAN ADDITION 8 REMODEL FOR M�.PRASHANTH TELANG 10445 BYRNE AVE. CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA-95014 Proj�ct ShM ��Dec 2013 /q2 ka� AS NOTED ', l � ) 2 4 5 6 Y B � A6 5'-0" � 35'-0" 7'-0"± 2'-6" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-5" �-- 8,9„+ 1 ---; _ __ W2 ► _ _ { _ � � ; (N�Egress Wnd � Vy9 $ N � (N)Master Bedroom (N)Study (N)Porch . 14'-1'x 12'-Btl2'x I 11'-0'x 9'-1 i!2't �\B'�9't x 9'-6 t2"z . . ... ...�N)<2'n HarOwooG Flr Ha�,p��k 71e FM 8'CLG �'8 9'CLG 8'CLG � < � < �. :% ' . D7 �-. . � A �. 1 D3 --- . D3 . ..,_,. - N � 5'-10" 5'-41/2' 7'-3" \ � CIOS@t . � �; �.:.. x.T �, oi I-:_ � (N)Bed Room#2 � � Master D4 n�F�� Ha�a��a F�� w � � . 8'CLG N . ii'-6'txt2�4'x - � � B2�Il . � � . � B'CLG , . � .... ..... ` _ : W ' .., ....._ .. I j' � �. y -� .. (N)MK Soace nccess � , " . �, .. � ...C�052t -� . f . 2a'.lo'mm. z� �. m � °`�� iuEMe Snower �� .. .. � :. ' :. .. ..a....:.;a.v. .:,.,:.:- ;w e�'.,�'.:,.+'nr� vF:. ... .v'.:':'.r .::. .. . ? w .......... �� N F = � o � �� . .��; � : � .... ... ...... .... ..... . . I..... .. ,... ., V: ...�: � . � 5•_�p- z._8. V � (R)Family ^? os „ ; ic A6 — — — — — � — — — � - _ W . . , �shower _ ''�, � � ' Cbsel � '�. � Bath C� � . . . . . ( . . N . � � � — . — �? Tlle Flr A ° B'CLG . . , � ? O c_ au.:.. ... ..,,..... . - ✓,..,..:..,, � _ :. .. ._. ,, - : �- ... .;>;, «,. J � � ..... . ..... � � - � f n� .' N : � ' , _ � j . .. .. . ... .... ..... .......�. ., .c � .. '� ' W �: : �... I � �o--__—_ � : W . �- . u - --------- v! o 0 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 2'-p^ � ' �... �Z'�" 6'-6' ��_p• � � � � - w � ' N C�)_l � Q � (N)Dining o A �cn � � Hardwood Flr ff' - �� R�i�I�CfI@fl � Vautted QG ' ; � DW �� .... ... ...... ..�.:.... . '� �, : Hardwood Fk L? �. .� . .� _._.. _.. .:. - :. _ _ o�c�c ° I _ (E)Bed Room#1 "-' �� W6 � �, � � . �. i i'.6'x x t2-9': .-_.-� -__. . � ..�� `. .._ .�^---��— ...... . HarOwood Flr . i ,. x ..: � , ... . . W �� WSH N I : 8'CLG ° � � .. . DYR � � REF . F �.. : ' � � .,.. ,.,....: w �..•:x. <y,:,: ;.,, --- � E oz � : _ w . (N)M c SDate Atcess . , �8 70'R 2a" . . ' (p � . .>: Cbsef ' ', ;: ............. . :: HaH Ba!n 07 u ., '� 4'-7" 12'-7" 3'-0' 3-s-t x5-G^x o I � W �, � , ..... ........ � B'CLG F �; �- V ; Q � ��..... . ....1 l2'Oef fOOt � a`w;.: a; .. .. ... .. . . � ' flOOr slope �� . . �N�Crwal Spat�Access � `z°• cb�� (R)Living � A' � -� tt'-10'ixt6'-�'t - B'CLG , v-: �� .............................. �. ,..,..:w: .,:�.. �. . �' _........ e�c�c_:..... ' � � Hardwood Flr �. �� N . , . � � ../N)ERtf3l .. �. 9'-0'CLG � . ' _ _ . __. �.. � - _ ... _ : 8'ClG � : �'. � '. ° T-5z z 5-9'i�. �... .... ...... . .._ .. . .. ' �. � (N)Eied,cal Fireplace� W (N)Garage I D1 � O � SIaD o�Grade � �� , MATCH(E�CLG . � : A .. � �. � � � � . .. �. � � � .F ! M f�. . t+ os ��• 4�_�• �.�. (N)Porch . 7'-2'x 5-10't �. '. . 9'CLG: x _ F . . . . . . - � . � .. . _• • _.._ �- W i 6) A6 _ ,N��Y.,�aow.,�a� t 24'aGwe Me FFL 2'-5" 2'-5" 12'-0„ 40-0" (N) FLOOR PLAN � N 1 2 4 5 6 � I 1N)a•.a•vipos� I ..... ........ ......... ...._ ..... ..._.... ...�... . ..... ..._.... ......... ...I...... ....... . al(N)vacn.�y7 . . I ... . . . -�....... ............. _.._ .._. ._.. .... ......... ...... i.._. i ' � T�------- � � � I ___—_'_J L—————————— ————————————————————� I � I I � � I �gn P7 wooC niliny ' i �� I . per Owrrer s choice � � I � � . ... �N)SkyLgM. � � � i - lo�'atrons4wlOwner. � I � I . I � I �G DOWN SPOUTS I i AS REQD. : � ..._.... ��. ._... - ( � � � Generol Notes See Site Plan on Sheet A1. See Wall legend on Sheet A2. See Schedule ot doors and windows on Sheet A4. See Elevations on Sheet A4&AS See Extenor finish spedfications o�Sheet A3. See Sections on Sheet A6. See T24 Calcultaio�s on on Sheet--- See Elecvical Layout Plan on Sheet--- See Svudural Plans antl Detai�s on Sheet—.—and—. : :,� � . ..._...... �.: � . , :r .... � .. f :^" �j � . __ _ . , ; : c-��-�j��D,..� ; � I � - .,_ __ ..,__._, I � , � � : I ,... ... '. `./" � � � � , _ �� g / . ' . , � . .. . . .. . ... i ` '' _i __" I i . I I � ........... � . : I ... : �._I ' .. . ... .. . : �.. : ; ': ... .` . ,. ' : ' .,.,....... .... - .. ..... �.. o ....-�. : � � ; ::- . - - � . .. � I, .._.,. .. ... .. __ .. � �: -. ,.: �.. ,...�,.:�.� I \ � � _ .........: : . ...'�: . ....�.. ;.... � I � I %� � Ridge Ventilalor � (N)CLASS A �� COMPOSITE ROOF �" � � ...... ....... . ._........:� , � � � j 5 ' � _ � ; _..., A I � i A6 i : _ .: ? ' ;,: i � I I �N�s��w��ei. � � ... :ia•aNme�e..No. �� ' � �n.o Cor�rm � J � � • ��s.�a.�. I � : I � I ; � : ' .. ._. .. ,: � ; � I � I ,. � ; I ;'...........: ':.: L � � � ___.. . - _--i_.. --- _._ __ � I --.__ ___ ___--- '> _:.. ........�....._.: I , I � ' -----1--------------------- ��---� �.. I " r- � � I � � � � I ' I � I . I � � I t; ..._. � _. :�.�. I : ; I ,.............. �;_ ...:. ' . � �- I � : � �i, , � ; ; , , I _.....: � � � Z � 1 � i.. � I � I I � ` 100 sq in Dormer Vents ` � --------------=--------------. I @3'aboveeaveslevel � I : � "�� .... ...... ...... ...._. � � : � , __ _ _ _ __...__ _ � � I (N)1 hour Fin itataE Eaves:ProviEe 5/g' � I . ��. /� I � GYC Boartl on tM undaBiEe.TyP where .'-� _` • �A. - . �• � ' eaves is wilhin 5'd P�7ertY line. I :'��Q . \��l ,�/ ', p ' i �� \�� '°� ��Oy� I I ,� � + '— : � :-' :� �� . : � �"� :"........ . :� ...._. �:,: -�. .. . . � Z " � �Hii�„F..w�sa [,.K r.o-..n se cw L—————— i ��a�,�»„�..v�. � .�..,....m,,, '- ----------------------� I 5 a��,. � ;' I _ r—=------------- .� .. .�...... . ......... ......................... .........L__ �-- _� : J1 (N)RC�F AT GARAGE AT PORCH �� 2 �5 �5 MATCH GARAGE (N) ROOF PLAN � N Revision/Issue � Date SEEMA SHENVI 408-996-7456 FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS ADDITION 8 REMODEL FOR Mr.PRASHANTH TELANG 10445 BYRNE AVE. CUPERTINO,CAUFORNIA-95014 Projxt Snest ��Dec 2013 A3 Scak 1/4"=1. m (N)Ciass A,50 Year Composite roof � (N)Stucco Finish � 12 v pitch�5 — ------ o (V � ..__..._ ....�... �:...... ._....... ......:.. . ,..�._._., . ....;.. . ��....... N :_ . � . . ..... �� .....:. . _� � X .., :._- .. ..._.: ..... ...... ......: ....: � v �� ca .,...._ , T.P. r. � ; � . -- -- -- . ... ,_ , . ,_.:, .�T- T P. ��.� -. . , � c � � ; W o 0 oa��o � �� _ � a 000aa�a � � � @ � m � Z , � °' � � 0��0 :.: ,- _ . T.o.S.F. .. :: oa�ao� "min to 14"max (N)Stone Veneer (N)4"wide Foam Trim Verify at site ��25° � Line 'high line at R i 5.0' (N Garage New Addition 5.0' (N)Setback (E/N)Setback (N)FRONT/EAST ELEVATION �(N)Stucco Finish � 25°� . Line 10'hi h line : o a 9 > . at R —� (N)Tread=12" min,Riser=7.75"max 5.0' � (E/N)Setback New Addition (N)REAR/WEST ELEVATION N)Class A,50 Year Composite Roof � � � 00 �u��-- - � � � � � � % LL1 +� _ � � � Q � (E)T.O.S.F. 12"max projection at 6"min to 14"max (N)garden window Verify at site * r 5.0' (N) Setback at Garage SCHEDU�E OF DOORS: DOOR TYPE SIZE DESCRIPTION D1 5'-0"x 6'-8" Ext dbl wd panel door D2 2'-8"x 6'-8" Embossed panel wd door D3 2'-6"x 6'-8" Embossed panel wd door D4 2'-4"x 6'-8" Embossed panel wd door D5 2'-2"x 6'-8" Embossed panel wd door D6 2'-4"x 6'-8" Bi-fold door �� 2'�"x 6'-8" Pocket door D8 3'-0"x 6'-8" Insul Stl door w/glass panel D9 16'-0"x 7'-0" Garage door D10 4'-0"x 6'-8" Sliding Closet door `All doors shall be of Owners choice. SCHEDULE OF WINDOWS: WINDOW TYPE* SIZE DESCRIPTION W1 7'-0"x 5'-0" Bay window y�/2 5'-0"x 4'-0" Dbl glazed slider with screen W3 2'-0"x 3'-0" Dbl glazed slider with screen W4 3'-0"x 2'-0" Tamper proof sliding with screen W5 6'-0"x 4'-0" Garden window W6 1'-6"x 1'-6" Fixed glazed window W7 1'-6"x 5-0" Single hung window W8 1'-6"x 6-8" Fixed Glazed window W9 5'-0"x 2-0" Double Glazed slider with screen Header height is 6'-8",Match Existing. 'Windows shall be of Owner's choice. 'Contractor shall field verity window dimensions. EXTERIOR FINISH SPECIFICATIONS: 1.Rooi matenal: Class A-50 Vear Composilion Shingles,malch existirg matc�(E)color. �� 2.fascia: 2x Fasaa,see eave detail,lypical. Cdor:Match exisling. 3.Gut�ers 26 gauge G.S.M.gutlers,typical Colo/shalt matrh lasda. 4.Downspouts: 26 gauge G.S.M.downspouls pnme and paint downspouts lo ma�ch adjacent color S.Flashing: p6 gauge fiashing and counler flas�all peneVa�ion at roof 4'min.lap,6'min.side lap. � Painl lo match adjacent colw,where exposed,wi(h, 1 st coat N7 722 Kel GuarA galvanized iron pnmer. �� 2nd coal#1240 Acry Shield atrylic flat finish. 6.Stucco Siding: Malch existlng.uno. � Color.Match exisling.uno. ��, _ ,,.., . � /�� ,,,�, _ . � � ,; ....� � c�as�_._�.,.�--�,z.. .- ...-- ...,y..n.,._y�.. _�r. ya.: . :a� . . /_ �/� �//�i F �`�� IIJ l�� E.., r.�.�.t w ,. .-- ---�•�t�. , , ,.�; �. __,.M..�a._ . ._ � ... .. .�...,...... iP General Notes See General Notes on Sheet–. See Specifications on Sheet--. See Wall legend on Sheet A2. See Schedule of doors and windows on Sheet A2. See Floor Plan 8 Roof Plan on Sheet A3 See Exterior finish specifications on Sheet See T24 Calcultaions on on Sheet—. See Electrical Layout Plan on Sheet–. See Structural Plans and Details on Sheet–.–and–. Revision/Issue � Dote � SEEMA SHENVI 408-996-7456 ELEVATIONS ADDITION&REMODEL FOR Mr.PRASHANTH TELANG 10445 BYRNE AVE. CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA-95014 v,��.cc sn..e ��Jan 2014 A4 xo» va•=i� _______,�__ (N)Ridge Line 12 pitch 5 (N)Class A,50 year Composite roof 'v , _� _ _,_.:.___ 00 _'..:. __...: ..., _._. , P_------- – vi _.:..:...,..._......._.._: } _C � � � X W W i t - U � � � � (E)T.O.S.F. 6"min to14"max verify at site NeW T x Addition (E) Home ` �N)Stucco Finish New New r r Addition Porch (N) SIDE/ NORTH ELEVATION ,2 5 pitch (N)Class A 50 year Composite roof -� (N)Stucco Finish � New (E)Home Addition (N) SIDE/ SOUTH ELEVATION New Garage k 'r 4'-0" New Ir—� Porch � �ao _ T.P._ (E)T.P. } � o, � .c j .� x � W � L � � (0 � (E)T.O.S.F. 6"min to 14"max Verify at site � n�.,...�y-..*�.a M F1� � ,��: . , �2G f�-�"� _ �- _..�..,�._� r�,...K,m�� , ._�_� ;d�.;;�r y�•�, , .. � _J I -I� ; , . .. , .. ._ . _.- _...�-,_:..�,.,m,��.,..�,.�,..�., General Notes See General Notes on Sheet–. See Specifications on Sheet--. See Wall legend on Sheet A2. See Schedule of doors and windows on Sheet A4. See Floor Plan&Roof Plan on Sheet A3 See Exterior finish specifications on Sheet A4 See Sheet A4 for notes not shown. See T24 Calcultaions on on Sheet—. See Electrical Layout Plan on Sheet–. See Structural Plans and Details on Sheet--,–and–. Revision/Issue � Date � � SEEMA SHENVI .oe�5sc-�.se ELEVATIONS ADDITION 8 REMODEL FOR Mr.PRASHANTH TELANG 10445 BYRNE AVE. CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA-95014 P�oject SI�Mt ��April 2014 A5 , xak 118"=1. Q � 'v � � � '^ V � w` Z LL / � W W ' > � � X (� O� w � �"' � Q T.O.S.F. — — —— T.P. � � � � � � w Z w � � � � +I Q c0 W � � T.O.S.F.(Match Exist) FOR DRNEWAY, SLOPE APJD DRaIN SEE Clvll DRAwINCs � T.P. iN��9"Auo�Ov..mang (N)CIa55 A 50 Vear CompoS�ion Shrtgle�oofng 301b uMeAaymem 1/7 CD%Plywa shaathing 2.RR d CJ�24'o.c.See Sbuclunl Dwgs. R-30 F.G.ins�lation 1/Y gyD�a fnish,painted � ` ��.��K:�,�_ � �NI18'RoolWemanq Provqc i4,"Gy�B�nrd io.Ovemeng n Sc1'wck (R)FAMILV (N�BATH CDX Plywa sheaming 2a4 S�uCS�16'o.c. R-17 F.G.inwlation �' �/Z�9yo bd fmish,painla0 (N)Snower Ericbsure � � � � Z � IEIfiUNtSa�C � � IEILWMtS^�GE R � 78'EMBOD Wall Ftg.See Stniclunl Drowings 1/7 gyD DElnish,painled (N)Flaor Finishes ro rtulch existing y�4 SIWs�16'o.c 3l4'Thk CO%PywE sheafhi�g,min uro R-73 F.G.inaulation L Jaat Q 2a'o.c.See Sln¢tunl Dwga. 12'gyp DE fmsn,paime0 R-i9 F.G.inwWtion BUILDING SECTION A A6 BUILDING SECTION B , A6 N)3 Coat 7/8'Stucm,paiineJ ro ma�c�e.ist CD%Mywa sneatn�ng 2x4 Studs�i6'o.c. R-73 F.G.�insulatron I2'9YO DC fmisn,pairiteC � . --� ;.� ��C�-�ol� 5 ,. p .�� - •.. �.' f�s`�"�ii ��(�''/L�' _ . �, �€��`i�L�,i�� d _. �._.., s�:�_..� ..�i General Notes I See Site Plan on Sheet A1. See Wall legend on Sheet A2. See Schedule of doors and windows on Sheet A4. I See Floor Plan 8 Roof Plan on Sheet A3 I See Elevations on Sheet A4 8 AS ', See Exterior finish specifications on Sheet ', See T24 Calcultaions o�on Sheet T24. ' See Electrical Layout Plan on Sheet E1. � See Structurel Plans and Details I on Sheet S1,S2 and S3. Revision/Issue � Date � SEEMA SHENVI .��o.,.;� SECTIONS ADDITION&REMODEL FOR Mr.PR.4SHANTH TELANG 10445 BYRNE AVE. CUPERTINO,CALIFORNIA-95014 �roject SAM ��March 2014 A6 Xab 1/4"=1'