Loading...
14-122 PlaceWorks for consultant services for CEQA Review for the KCR Hotel Project OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE •CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3223• FAX: (408)777-3366 C U P E RT I N O WEBSITE:www.cuportino.org September 22, 2014 Placeworks 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkley, CA 94709 Re: Second Amendment to agreement for consultant services for the KCR Project. A fully executed copy of the agreement for consultant services with the City of Cupertino is enclosed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Community Development Department at (408) 777-3308. Sincerely, Andrea Sanders Senior Office Assistant City Clerk's Office Enclosure cc: Community Development � a SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND PLACEWORKS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE KCR HOTEL PROTECT This Second Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Cupertino and PlaceWorks, for reference dated August 22nd, 2014, is by and between the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and PlaceWorks, a California corporation, whose address is 1:_625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300, Berkeley, California 94709, (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"), and is made with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. On Tune 6, 2014, an agreement was entered into by and between City and PlaceWorks (hereinafter "Agreement"). B. City and PlaceWorks desire to modify the Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between and undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM: The term section of the Agreement shall remain the same and shall be in full force and effect. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: Additional services to be performed include the additional scope of work described in Exhibit A. 3. COMPENSATION: The Compensation section of the Agreement shall be increased by this amendment in the amount not to exceed $4,383.00, for a total contract amount not to exceed $85,746.00 Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and covenants set forth in the Agreement shall remain the same and shall be in full force and effect. Page 71 of 2 Second Amendment,PlaceWorks,KCR Hotel Project,8-22 1.4 r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this modification of Agreement to be executed. CITY OF CUPERTINO A Municipal Corporation By ,Q Gar 'Chao, City Planner Title Date Date APPR ED AS TO FORM: By Carol KoradeCity Attorney ATTEST: B -9 d y 9� Grace Schmidt, City Clerk EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT PO#58530 Original Contract:110-2211,-BS 23418 $77,375.00 Amendment 91:110-2211,BS 23697 $3,988.00 Amendment#2:110-2211,BS 24225 $4,383.00 Total: $85,746.00 Page 2 of 2 Second Amendment,PlaceWorks,KCR Hotel Project,8-22-14 EXHIBIT A AL, . RKS CONTRACT MODIFICATION PROJECT KCR Hotel Project Review PLACEWORKS PROJECT NUMBER COCU-04.0 CONTRACT MODIFICATION NUMBER 2 DATE August 5,2014 FROM Kyle Simpson TO George Schroeder City of Cupertino, Planning Division 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,CA 95014 THIS CONTRACT MODIFICATION AMENDS THE EXISTING CONTRACT BETWEEN PLACEWO'RKS AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR THE HYATT HOUSE CEQA REVIEW. ' r The existing scope of work is hereby amended as follows: The cost estimate for this Contract Modification is included on Table 1. The following task names and number are keyed to the previously-approved scope of work. Task B. Traffic Impact Analysis 15.Traffic Update Hexagon will analyze an intersection not previously included in the completed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The City of Cupertino has requested that Hexagon Transportation Consultants analyze the intersection of Wolfe Road and Homestead Road under all traffic scenarios. Because,this intersection was not included in the original scope of work, incorporating this change will require the following additional analysis: ♦ Evaluate Traffic Conditions at the Intersection of Wolfe Road and Homestead Road. Intersection levels of service will be evaluated at.this intersection during the AM and PM peak hour under all the traffic scenarios included in the TIA. Hexagon will use existing count data for that intersection,which was collected in 2011 for another traffic study. t ♦ Update the Draft Traffic Report. Hexagon will update the existing draft report, including all text, tables, and figures to reflect the addition of this study intersection. 162 5 - tt'u.6..Ave�i e, Suite.<t,.r 300 f hC l \x.�g f # S R o£s'f F : c..T -, ..q.. 0, r P'.a c e +.r` :'r« o KEWORKS Task C. Environmental Review 1. Initial Study Preparation PlaceWorks will update the Initial Study based on the revised site plan dated July 30,2014. Construction-related air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be revised based on the updated site plan for the Hyatt House at Vallco Park. Based on the updated construction information,the revised site plan result in additional soil export,which would result in additional criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions generated during this construction phase.To ensure the environmental document is internally consistent, emissions modeling will be updated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) and the revised model outputs will be incorporated into the MND. Other resource topic areas will be updated, as appropriate,to reflect.the updated site plan. PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 81,363.00 AMOUNT OF THIS AMENDMENT $ 4,383.00 NEW TOTAL.CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 85,746.00 Terms for billing and payment of the additional contract cost: Same as existing contract. All other terms and conditions of the proposal dated April 29, 2014 remain unchanged. PLACEWORKs CLIENT SIGNATURE STEVE'NOACK, PRINCIPAL I r. Table 1 , KCR Hotel Project Review Contract Modification 2 Cost Estimate PlaceWorks Hexagon Steve Senior Project Hours per Task Noack, Associate/ Associate Planner/ Project Graphics/ Principal Engineer Planner Designer Scientist WP Labor Per Task A. Project Initiation Task Task B.Traffic Impact Analysis Task C. Environmental Review Task D. Public Review and Response to Comments Memo 10 4 Task E.Adoption of CEQA Document 2,1'40 Project Management and Staff Meetings Total Hours - Billing Rate - 10 4 - _ — Labor Cost $200 $160 $135 $105 $95 $80 $0 $1,600 $540 $0 $0 $0 Total Firm Labor Cost EXPENSES $2,140 $2,000 Subconsultant Administration (10%) Office Expenses(Phone, Fax, Copies,etc. @ 2%'of Labor) 200 Total Expenses 43 ' TOTAL PER FIRM $243 $ GRAND TOTAL 2,383 $2,000 $4,383 8/5/2014 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE:(403)777-3223•FAX: (408)777-3366 C U P E RT 1 N O WEBSITE:www.cijpertino.org July 7, 2014 P1aceWorks 1625 Shattuck Ave. Suite 300 Berkley, CA 94709 Re: First Amendment to agreement for consultant services. A fully executed copy of the agreement for consultant services with the City of Cupertino is enclosed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Community Development Department at (408) 777-3308. Sincerely, Andrea Sanders Senior Office Assistant City Clerk's Office Enclosure cc: Community Development 0 F�R�T AMENDMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND PLACEWORKS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE KCR HOTEL PROJECT This First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Cupertino and PlaceWorks, for reference dated June 6, 2014, is by and between the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and PlaceWorks, a California corporation, whose address is 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite,300;.Berkeley, California 94709, (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"), and is made with reference to the following: , RECITALS: A. On Tune 6, 2014, an agreement was entered into by and between City and PlaceWorks (hereinafter "Agreement"). B. City and PlaceWorks desire- to modify the Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutuallly agreed by and between and undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM: The term section of the Agreement shall remain 'the same and shall.be in full force and effect. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: Additional services to be. performed include the additional scope of work described in Exhibit A. 3. COMPENSATION: The Compensation section of the Agreement shall be increased by this amendment in the amount not to exceed $3,988.00, for a total contract amount not to exceed $81,363.00 Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and covenants set forth in the Agreement shall remain the same and shall be in full force and effect. Page 1 of 2 First Amendment,PlaceWorks,KCR Hotel Project;6-184:4: u IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this fnodification of Agreement to be executed. CITY OF CUPERTINO A Municipal Corporation By:ht:::> By G ryChao, City Planner Title 1/V C/oda } Date Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By A" Carol Korade,City Attorn ATTEST: By C 0 V- 44i Grace Schmidt, City Clerk EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT Original Contract:110-2211,BS 23418 $77,375.00 Amendment#1:110-2211,BS 23697 $3,988.00 Total: $81,363.00 �G e' Page 2 of 2 First Amendment,P1aceWorks,KCR Hotel Project,6-18-14 f Exhibit A PLACEWORKS CONTRACT MODIFICATION PROJECT KCR Hotel Project Review PLACEWORKS PROJECT NUMBER COCU-04.0 CONTRACT MODIFICATION NUMBER 1 DATE June 2,2014 FROM Kyle Simpson TO George Schroeder City of Cupertino, Planning bivision 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 THIS CONTRACT MODIFICATION AMENDS THE EXISTING CONTRACT BETWEEN PLACEWORKS AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR THE HYATT HOUSE CEQA REVIEW. The existing scope of work is hereby amended as follows: The cost estimate for this Contract Modification is included on Table 1. The following task names and number are keyed to the previously-approved scope of work. Task.B.Traffic Impact Analysis 14. Parking Study Based on the information provided by the City, Hexagon Transportation Consultants understands that the proposed hotel would provide a parking supply that is less than the number of spaces required by the Parking Ordinance,Chapter 19.124 of the Municipal Code. As a result,the Project would require a Parking Exception. Parking Exceptions require a detailed parking study to demonstrate that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed parking supply. Hexagon will conduct a detailed parking study at three existing business hotels in Cupertino: Aloft, Cupertino Inn and Hilton Garden Inn.The parking study will include conducting parking counts between the hours of 6 PM and 10 PM (when the parking demand is expected to peak) on a typical weekday and on the weekend to determine an appropriate parking ratio for business hotels. PlaceWorks will edit the study into the Initial Study document. 1 1.625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley,California 94709 510.848.3815 ( PlaceWorks.com PLACEWORKS PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 77,375.00 AMOUNT OF THIS AMENDMENT $ 3,988.00 NEW TOTAL CONTRACT-AMOUNT $ 81,363.00 Terms for billing and payment of the additional contract cost: Same as existing contract. All other terms and conditions of the proposal dated April 29,-2014 remain unchanged. 1 PLACE WORKS CLIENT SIGNATURE STEVE NOACK, PRINCIPAL • �l Table 2 KCR Hotel Project Review Cost Estimate PlaceWorks Hexagon Steve Senior Project Noack, Associate/ Associate Planner/ Project Graphics/ Labor Per Hours per Task Principal Engineer Planner Designer Scientist WP Task Task A. Project Initiation Task B.Traffic Impact Analysis I 135 Task C. Environmental Review Task D. Public Review and Response to Comments Memo _ Task E.Adoption of CEQA Document Project Management and Staff Meetings Total Hours Billing Rate $200 $165 $135 $105 $95 $80 Labor Cost $0 $0 $135 $0 $0 $0 Total Firm Labor Cost $135 $3,500 EXPENSES Mileage(@$0.565 per mile) Travel Subconsultant Administration(10%) 350 Deliveries _ Office Expenses(Phone,Fax,Copies,etc.@ 2%of Labor) 3 Report Production Total Expenses $353 TOTAL PER FIRM $488 $3,500 GRAND TOTAL $3,988 6/2/2014 OFFICE OF THE COTY CLERK CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE:(403)777-3223• FAX: (408)777-3366 C U P E R.T.I N O WEBSITE:www.ctipertino.org July 7, 2014 PlaceWorks 1625 Shattuck Ave. Suite 300 Berkley, CA 94709 Re: Agreement for contract services. A fully executed copy of the agreement foi', consultant services with the City of Cupertino is enclosed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Community Development Department at (408) 777-3308. Sincerely, Andrea Sanders Senior Office-Assistant City Clerk's Office Enclosure cc: Community Development 4, R 6 AG EEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND PLACEWORKS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOIE: CEOA REVIEW FOR THE KCR HOTEL PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, for reference dated Tune 6, 2014, is by and between CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal. corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and P1aceWorks, a California corporation, whose address is 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite"300, Berkeley, California 94709 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"), and,is made with reference to the following: RECITALS: A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the Constitution and the statutes of the State of California and the Cupertino Municipal Code. B. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and C. City and Consultant desire to enter into an agreement for a total amount not to exceed SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE DOLLARS ($77,375)upon the terms and conditions herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is n iutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM: The term of this Agreement sh a.11 commence on Tune 6, 2014, and shall terminate on Tune 30, 2015, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: Consultant shall perform each and every service set forth in Exhibit A, according to the project schedule set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. Consultant's Project Manager to represent consultant during the day-to- day work on the Project is Steve Noack, Principal. Consultant's Project Manager shall have supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress, and execution of the Services. If circumstances cause.,the substitution of the project director, project coordinator, or any other key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute project director and the assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior written approval of the City. Consultant, at City's request, also agrees to promptly remove personnel who City finds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner. 3. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT: Consultant shall be compensated for services performed pursuant to this Agreement in the amounts set forth in Exhibits "C", which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Payment shall be made by checks- drawn on the treasury of the City, to be taken from the 110-2211 fund. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to the City in accordance with the provisions set forth in Exhibits C. 4. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Consultant and City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Agreement. 5: STANDARD OF CARE: Consultant agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City nor have any contractual relationship with City. 6. INDEPENDENT PARTIES: City and Consultant intend that the relationship between them created by this Agreement is that of employer-independent contractor. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Agreement. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Consultant's services. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees, including but not limited to, unemployment insurance; workers' compensation plans, vacation and sick leave are. available from City to Consultant, its employees or agents. Deductions,shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any fees due Consultant. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Consultant. 7. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IRCA): Consultant assumes any and all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of his/her employees performing work hereunder,. pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Consultant shall indernify and hold City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability,, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Consultant. 8. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Consistent with City's policy that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable employer/employee conduct, Consultant agrees that harassment or discrimination directed toward a job applicant, a City employee, or a citizen by Consultant or Consultant's employee or subcontractor on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, disability, marital status, pregnancy, sex, age, or sexual orientation will not be tolerated. Consultant agrees that any and all violations of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 9. HOLD HARMLESS: A. Indemni1y Obligations Subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8 1. Where the law establishes a standard of care for Consultant's professional services, and to the extern the Consultant breaches or fails to meet such established standard of care, or is alleged to have breached or failed to meet such standard of care, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to all services performed in connection with the Agreement, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any iu1d all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against: any of them, including any injury to or death of any person or damage to property or other liability of any nature, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or Consultant's employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. Consultant shall not be obligated under this Agreement to indemnify City to the extent that the damage is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of City, its agents or employees. 2. Notwithstanding the foregoin;�, the Consultant has no duty to provide or to pay for an up-front defense against unproven claims or allegations, but shall pay or reimburse the City for its reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or its 0 a employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. However, the Consultant shall provide its immediate and active cooperation and assistance to the City, at no additional cost to the City, in analyzing, defending, and resolving such claims. B. Claims for Other Liability. For all liabilities other than those included within paragraph A. above, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever from and against any of them, including any injury to or death of any person or damage to property or other liability of any nature, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligent performance of this Agreement by Consultant or Consultant's employees, officers, officials, agents or independent contractors. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. Consultant shall not be obligated under this Agreement to indemnify City to the extent that the damage is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of City, its agents or employees. C. Claims involving intellectual propel. In addition to the obligations set forth in (A) and (B) above, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and against any Claim in which a violation of intellectual property rights, including but not limited to copyright or patent rights, is alleged that arises out of, pertains to, or relates to Consultant's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct under this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees of counsel of City's choice, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. 10. INSURANCE: On or before the commencement of the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with paragraphs 9A, B, C, D and E. Such certificates, which do not limit Consultant's indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement: "Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration.date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the City of Cupertino by certified mail, Attention: City Manager." It is agreed that Consultant shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Agreement all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Agreement with an insurance company that is acceptable to City and licensed to do- insurance business in the State of California. Endorsements naming the City as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates. A. COVERAGE: Consultant shall maintain the-following insurance coverage: (1) Workers' Compensation: Statutory coverage as required by the State of California. (2) Liability: Commercial general liability coverage in the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury: $500,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate -all other Property Damage: $100,000 each occurrence $250,000 aggregate If submitted, combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amounts of $1,000,000 will, be considered equivalent to.the required minimum limits shown above. (3) Automotive: Comprehensive automotive liability coverage in the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury: $500,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $100,000 each occurrence or Combined Single Limit: $500,000 each occurrence (4) Professional Liabi:[ft: Professional liability insurance which includes coverage for the professional acts, errors and omissions of Consultant in the amount of at least$1,000,000. B. SUBROGATION WAIVER: Consultant agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which he/she has agreed to provide comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance, Consultant shall look solely to his/her insurance for recovery. Consultant hereby grants to City, on behalf of any insurer providing comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance to either Consultant or City with respect to the services of Consultant herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said Consultant may acquire against City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. C. FAILURE TO SECURE: If Consultant at any time during the term hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in the Consultant's name or as an agent of the Consultant and shall be compensated by the Consultant for the costs-of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed from the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid. D. ADDITIONAL INSURED: City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees and volunteers shall be named as an additional insured under all insurance coverage, except any professional liability insurance, required by this Agreement. The naming of an additional insured shall not affect any recovery to which such additional insured would be entitled under this policy if not named as such additional insured. An additional insured named herein shall not be held liable for any premium, deductible portion of any loss, or expense of any nature on this policy or any extension thereof. Any other insurance held by an additional insured shall not be required to contribute anything toward any loss or expense covered by the insurance provided by this policy. E. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by 'City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Consultant. Consultant is advised to confer with Consultant's insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Consultant. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Consultant warrants that it is not a conflict of interest for Consultant to perform the services required by this Agreement. Consultant may be required to fill out a conflict of interest form if the services provided under this Agreement require Consultant to make certain governmental decisions or serve in a staff capacity as defined in Title 2, Division 6, Section 18700 of the California Code of Regulations. 12. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS: Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and.any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for money by Consultant from City under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. Written, notice of such assignment shall be promptly furnished to City by Consultant. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant, if Consultant is a partnership or joint venture or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall be construed as an.assignment of this Agreement. Control means .fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power of the corporation. 13. SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL: Unless prior written consent.from City is obtained, only those people and subcontractors whose names and resumes are attached to this Agreement shall be used in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant.may change or add subcontractors only with the.prior written approval of City. In the event that Consultant errLploys subcontractors, such subcontractors shall be required to furnish proof of workers' compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general; automobile and professional liability insurance in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Consultant. In addition, any work or services subcontracted hereunder shall be.subject to each provision of this Agreement. 14. PERMITS AND LICENSES: Consultant, at his/her sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all- approl'iriate permits, certificates and licenses including, but not limited to, a City Business License, that may be required in connection with the performance of services hereunder. 15. REPORTS: A. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record and other document, hereinafter collectively refe_irred to as "Report", reproduced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement, shall be the exclusive property of City once payment has been received by the Consultant. Consultant shall not copyright any Report required by this Agreement and shall execute appropriate documents to assign to City the copyright to Reports created pursuant to this Agreement. Any Report, information and data acquired or required by this Agreement shall become the property of City, and all publication rights are reserved to City. Consultant may retain a copy of any report furnished to the City pursuant to this Agreement. B. All Reports prepared by Consultant may be used by City in execution or implementation of: (1) The original Project` for which Consultant was hired; (2) Completion of the original Project by others; (3) Subsequent additions to the original project; and/or (4) Other City projects as appropriate. C. Consultant shall, at such time and in such form as City may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services required under this Agreement. D. All Reports required to be provided by this Agreement shall be printed on recycled paper. All Reports shall be copied on both sides of the paper except for one original, which shall be single sided. E. No Report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available to any individual or organization by Consultant without prior approval by City. If such Reports are reused by City for any purpose other than that for which such Reports were originally prepared, or if City causes such Reports to be altered without Consultant's written consent, such reuse shall be at City's risk. 16. RECORDS: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided .in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to such books and records to the representatives of City or its designees at all proper times, and gives City the right to examine and audit same, and to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. If supplemental examination or audit of the records is necessary due to concerns raised by City's preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City's supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of contract or failure to act in good faith, then Consultant shall reimburse City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit. 17. NOTICES: All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. All.notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at: City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino CA 95014 Attention: Aarti Shrivastava, Director of Community Development All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at: PlaceWorks 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 Attention: Steve Noack, AICP, Principal 18. TERMINATION: In the event Consultant fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions hereof at the time and in the manner required hereunder, Consultant shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within the time specified after receipt by Consultant from City of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, City may terminate the Agreement forthwith.by giving to the Consultant written notice thereof. City shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving; seven (7) days' prior written notice to Consultant as provided herein. Upon germination of this Agreement, each party shall pay to the other party that portion of compensation specified in this Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the effective date of termination. 19. COMPLIANCES: Consultant shall comply with all state or federal laws and;all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by City. 20. CONFLICT OF LAW: This Agreement shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of California.excepting any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Agreement and obligations of the . parties are subject to all valid laws, . orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Agreement (or the successors of those authorities.) ' Any suits brought pursuant to this Agreement shall be filed with the courts of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. 21. ADVERTISEMENT: Consultant shall not post, exhibit, display or allow to be posted, exhibited, displayed any signs, advertising, show bills, lithographs, posters or cards of any kind pertaining to the services performed under this Agreement unless prior written approval has been secured from City to do otherwise. 22. WAIVER: A waiver by City of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character. 22. INTEGRATED CONTRACT: This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Consultant. 23. INSERTED PROVISIONS: Each provision and clause required by law to be inserted into the Agreement shall be deemed to be enacted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though each were included herein. If through mistake or otherwise, any such provision is not inserted or is not correctly inserted, the Agreement shall be amended to make such insertion on application by either party. 24. CAPTIONS: The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of the Agreement and in no way affect, limit or amplify the terms or provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused.the Agreement to be executed. CONSULTANT CITY OF CUPERTINO A Municipal Corporation P1aceWorks 9 Byll By Gar Chao Title /L nl. Pte, Title Assist tD -ec�r Date sZ 3zz 1� Date 1-K- ?,0 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: B Y 5 is Title Assistant City Manager APP'C VED AS TO FORM:, By City Attorney ATTEST: By: City Clerk EXPENDITURE DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT Contract Amount: $77,375.00 Account: 110-2211,BS 23418 , r 0 Exhibit A PLACEWORKS. April 29, 2014 George Schroeder Associate Planner City of Cupertino Planning Division 10300 Torre Avenue I Cupertino,CA 95014 408-777-7601 1 georges @cupertino.org Re: Proposal to Prepare the KCR Hotel Project CEQA Review Dear George: Per your request, we have prepared the attached scope of work to prepare the KCR Hotel Project CEQA Review for the City of Cupertino. Work Scope This scope of work describes the tasks to be completed by the PlaceWorks team for KCR Hotel Project CEQA review, and the schedule by which each of these products will be completed. The proposed project is to construct a 148-room, 5-story hotel on the southeast quadrant of the Wolfe Road/1-280 interchange. The facility includes a full service restaurant, bar, and meeting rooms. Parking would be provided through an underground garage(73 spaces)and surface lot(90 spaces). Based on our understanding of the proposed project, it is assumed in this scope of work that the resulting document will'be an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), which will be based either on the Appendix N (infill) or Appendix G,checklist in the CEQA Guidelines.As a first step, following Notice to Proceed, PlaceWorks will evaluate the project under the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332 to determine whether the project could bE!classified as exempt, based on the criteria set forth in the Section. (Time for this task is included as part of Task A, below.) A summary of the work program is presented in Table 1. Task A. Project Initiation This task involves activities related to start-up of environmental review for the project and has been structured to streamline the process and optimize the overall timeline for KCR Hotel Project. The activities included under this task will also clearly establish the parameters for the technical analyses and CEQA review to follow. 1. Start-Up Meeting and Site Visit ° PlaceWorks and Hexagon will attend a start-up meeting with City staff to discuss expectations and concerns, and to review key issues, information needs, work' products, and schedules. The methodology to be used for the Traffic, Air Quality, and GHG analysis will also be reviewed at this meeting to ensure the parameters for the analysis are clearly established at the outset of the process. 1625 Shattuck Avenue,Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ( PlaceWorks.com PLACEWORKS T R4K PR®GRAIvi SUNINIARY Task A: Project Initiation 1. Start-Up Meeting&Site Visit 2. Project Description Task B: Traffic Impact Analysis 1. Site Reconnaissance 7. Evaluate Project Conditions 2. Observe Existing Traffic Conditions in the Study 8. Vehicle Queuing Analysis Area 9. Site Access, On-Site Circulation, & Parking 3. Data Collection 10.Bicycle, Pedestrian, &Transit Facilities 4. Evaluate Existing Conditions 11.Evaluate Cumulative Conditions S. Evaluate Background Conditions 12.Impacts& Recommendations 6. Project Trip Generation, Distribution, & 13.Reports&Response to Comments Assignment Task C: Environmental Review 1. Initial Study Preparation (IS) 3. IS/MND Delivery 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) 4. Mitigation Monitoring &Reporting Program Preparation Preparation &Delivery Task D: Public Review&Response to Comments Task E: Adoption 2. Project Description PlaceWorks will draft a Project Description using graphics and textual information provided by the City and applicant. The Project Description will include detailed information on the site preparation and project construction. We will submit one electronic copy of the Draft Project Description to the City for review and comment. Upon.approval by City staff, the Project Description will be distributed PlaceWorks team for reference. Task B. Traffic Impact Analysis Hexagon will prepare a stand-alone Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report for the proposed project. The TIA report will be critical to the environmental review of the project and will provide inputs used for air quality, GHG, and noise modeling.The purpose of the traffic analysis is to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City of Cupertino, and the Valley Transportation Agency (VTA). The VTA administers-the Santa Cara County Congestion Management Program (CMP). Since the project would not generate more than 100 peak hour trips, a CMP analysis will not.be required. Hexagon completed a preliminary trip generation estimate using the vehicular trip generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 9th Edition. It is not anticipated that a freeway analysis will be necessary for this project. The traffic analysis will include an analysis of weekday AM (7-9 AM)and PM (4-6 PM) peak-hour traffic conditions and will determine the traffic impacts of the proposed development on key intersections in the vicinity of the site. April 29, 2014 I Page 2 PLACEWORKS Hexagon will study the following nine intersections: 1. Wolfe Road and 1-280 NB Ramp* 2. Wolfe Road and 1-280 SB Ramp* 3. Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway 4. Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard* S. Perimeter Road and Vallco Parkway 6. Finch Avenue and Vallco Parkway 7. Finch Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard 8. N Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway 9. N Tantau Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard Asterisk(*)denotes CMP intersections. The tasks to be included in the traffic analysis are: 1. Site (Reconnaissance The physical characteristics of the site and the surrounding roadway network will be reviewed to identify existing roadway cross-sections, speed limits, intersection lane configurations, traffic control devices,and surrounding land uses. 2. Observe Existing Traffic Conditions in the Study Area Existing traffic conditions will be observed in the field in order to identify any operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of calculated levels of service. 3. Data Collection Existing AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes for seven of the-study intersections as well as information on approved projects will be obtained from the City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment EIR traffic study project. The intersections at Perimeter/Vallco and Finch/Vallco will require new turning movement counts to be conducted on a typical weekday (Tuesday through Thursday)for both the AM and PM peak periods. 4. Evaluate Existing Conditions The existing traffic conditions at the key intersections will be evaluated with the City of Cupertino's level of service methodology using current AM and PM peak-hour volumes. 5. Evaluate Background Conditions Background traffic volumes represent the existin€;volumes plus the projected volumes from approved developments that have not yet been constructed and occupied, and will include the Main Street project currently under construction. Approved project'trips and/or approved project information will be obtained from the City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment EIR traffic study project. April 29, 2014 1 Page 3 r �G, PLACEWORKS 6. Project Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Estimates of trips to be added to the surrounding roadway network by the proposed development will be based on the trip generation rates published by the ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition. Estimates will be made for peak-hour and daily trip generation, including Saturday and Sunday. The directional distribution of site-generated traffic will be forecasted based on the existing travel patterns, and relative locations of complementary land uses. The site-generated traffic will be assigned to the roadway network based on the trip generation and distribution pattern discussed above. Estimates will be made of both peak-hour and daily volumes at each of the study intersections. 7. Evaluate Project Conditions Project-generated traffic will be added to (1)existing, and (2) background traffic volumes. Intersection level of service calculations will be conducted to estimate the operating levels of the key intersections during the AM and PM peak hours after the completion of the proposed development under existing +project and background+project conditions. B. Vehicle Queuing Analysis For selected locations where the project would add a significant number of left-turning vehicles, the adequacy of existing/planned storage at turn pockets will be assessed by means of comparison with expected maximum (95th percentile) vehicle queues. Queuing at the project driveway also will be evaluated. 9. Site Access, On-Site Circulation, and Parking Hexagon will review the project site plan to determine the overall adequacy of site access and on-site circulation in accordance with generally accepted traffic engineering standards. The review will include a quantitative analysis of the anticipated traffic volumes at the access points, as well as a qualitative analysis of the proposed site circulation and parking layout. Parking supply and layout will be evaluated in accordance with the City of Cupertino parking standards. Hexagon and PlaceWorks will also coordinate with MIG on the Vallco Connectivity Plan to address future access and circulation design within the Vallco District in relation to the proposed project. 10..6icycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities A qualitative analysis of the project's effect on transit service in the area and on bicycle and pedestrian circulation in the study area will be included in the traffic report. Any impacts of the project on nearby facilities will be identified and improvements recommended to mitigate impacts. 11. Evaluate Cumulative Conditions Cumulative conditions represent future traffic conditions with the proposed project and the addition of expected growth in the area. Cumulative traffic volumes will be based on the City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment EIR TIA. April 29, 2014 Page 4 e PLACEWORKS 12. Impacts and Recommendations Hexagon will identify and describe impacts, basE�d on the results of the level of service calculations. They will develop recommended mitigation measures that identify the locations and types of improvements or modifications necessary to mitigate significant project impacts. 13. Reports and Response to Comments Hexagon will summarize their findings and recommendations in a draft TIA report. Hexagon will respond to editorial comments on the administrative draft report and prepare a final TIA report. PlaceWorks will edit the report into the Initial,Study document. Task C. Environmental Review 1. Initial Study Preparation PlaceWorks will prepare an Initial Study that documents existing conditions, project impacts (if any), and mitigation measures (if required), as well as the resulting level of significance for each of the topical areas required under CEQA. CEQA permits the exclusion of environmental issues on which it can be seen with certainty that the project would have no significant negative impact. Given the urbanized character of Cupertino and the level of development in the area surrounding the project site, the following CEQA resource categories are not considered relevant for the project and will be summarily dismissed in the Initial Study: Agricultural and Forestry Resources Mineral Resources In keeping with the requirements of CEQA, the Initial Study will include a detailed analysis to determine the environmental impacts for the following resource categories: a. Aesthetics PlaceWorks will use its expertise in site plannirug*and urban design to analyze potential aesthetic impacts associated with the proposed project. Using renderings and graphic information supplied by KCR, the analysis will focus on the visual compatibility of the project with adjoining development, preservation of scenic vistas and view corridors, and light and glare impacts. This scope of work does not include preparation of or technical evaluation of visual simulations of the project. b. Air Quality Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Community Risk and Hazards PlaceWorks will conduct a Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, and Community Risk and Hazards analysis to evaluate potential air quality and GHG impacts of the proposed Project. The analyses will be prepared in accordance with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines for impacts, of the Project on the environment.' The approach outlined below is based on BAAQMD's Guidelines and screening tables ' While adoption of the thresholds was set asidE!until an environmental evaluation is conducted pursuant to a recent court ruling, the BAAQMD's significance criteria, as outlined in their CEQA Guidelines, are supported by extensive studies and analysis. L April 29,.2014 1 Page 5 PLACEWORKS for Project-Level analyses. Results of the technical analyses will be compiled in the MND and modeling will be included as an appendix. i. Air Quality a) Construction The proposed Project would result in the construction of up to 148 hotel rooms.The screening criteria identify project sizes that have been determined to have emissions.that do not exceed BAAQMD's significance thresholds. Because operation of the Project would not exceed the BAAQMD screening criteria for criteria pollutants for a hotel project,which is 554 hotel rooms, a full (quantitative)analysis of Project-related criteria air pollutant impacts would not be warranted. Consequently, construction- related air quality impacts of the Project will be discussed qualitatively in the MND based on BAAQMD's screening criteria. b) Operation Operation of the Project would not exceed the BAAQMD screening criteria for criteria pollutants for a hotel project, which is 489 hotel rooms. Therefore, a full (quantitative) analysis of Project-related criteria air pollutant impacts would not be warranted. Consequently,the operational phase air quality impacts of the Project will be discussed qualitatively in the MND based on BAAQMD's screening criteria: The operational phase analysis will also evaluate consistency with BAAQMD's air quality management plan and placement of sensitive land uses proximate to existing odors. It is anticipated that the Project would not generate enough traffic volumes to warrant a detailed carbon monoxide hotspot analysis; therefore, a detailed analysis compared to BAAQMD's carbon monoxide thresholds is not necessary and impacts would also be handled qualitatively. ii. Community Risk and Hazards a) Off-Site Construction Health Risk Projects with construction activities proximate to sensitive land uses have the potential to expose sensitive individuals to elevated concentrations of toxic air contaminants and fine particulate matter (including diesel particulate matter). The closest sensitive receptors to the Project site are approximately 200 meters (656 feet)to the west. Based on BAAQMD's Screening Tables for Air Toxics Evaluation During Construction, sensitive receptors would need to be within 150 meters (492 feet) in order to trigger BAAQMD's construction risk significance thresholds. Consequently, construction- related community risk and hazards impacts of the Project will be discussed qualitatively in the MND based on BAAQMD's screening criteria. a) On-Site Operational Health Risk BAAQMD also requires evaluation of potential on-site community risk and hazard impacts if sensitive receptors are located proximate to major sources of air pollution.The proposed Project is adjacent to Interstate 280 (1-280), which has traffic volumes significantly greater than 10,000 vehicles per day. While BAAQMD considers hotels to be sensitive land uses, based on communications with BAAQMD, the overall exposures would be short term and likely not be of concern and would not exceed BAAQMD's community risk and hazards significance threshold. Consequently, operational-related community risk and hazards impacts of the Project will be discussed qualitatively in the MND based on BAAQMD's guidance regarding the relatively short exposure duration for this type of sensitive land use. April 29, 2014 1 Page 6 4 i PLACEWORKS iii. Greenhouse Gas Emissions a) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory The Project involves the construction of up to 148 hotel rooms and would exceed the screening criteria for GHG emissions, which is 83 hotel roorns. A GHG emissions inventory will be conducted for the proposed Project. GHG emissions from transportation sources, area .sources (landscaping fuel, architectural coatings, consumer products), energy sources (natural gas consumption, energy use), water and wastewater, and waste will be calculated using a BAAQMD approved model (e.g., CalEEMod). Based on a preliminary model run for a 148-room hotel, the Project would exceed BAAQMD's significance threshold of 1,100 metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions. The majority of criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions generated by the Project will be from new vehicle trips traveling to and from the Project site. Therefore, we will need to work coordinate closely with Hyatt and the traffic consultant to obtain daily truck/vendor deliveries for typically hotels; weekday, Saturday, and Sunday trip generation; and trip reductions associated with use and availability of alternative modes of transportation and other transportation control measures,-as documented in the traffic study. GHG emission reductions from project design features, which reduce other operational sources of emissions, will also be quantified. The MND will incorporate mitigation measures, as necessary,to achieve BAAQMD's significance criteria. b) Consistency with GHG Reduction Plan: The GHG emissions analysis will also include a discussion the GHG reduction targets of Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), as identified in the California Air Resources Board's (CARB)Scoping Plan, and regional per capita transportation targets for passenger vehiclE!s under Senate Bill 375 (SB 375), as identified in the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) Plan Bay Area. The GHG analysis will also include a consistency evaluation with applicable goals and policies of CARB's Scoping Plan and MTC's Plan Bay Area. The City of Cupertino is in the process of preparing;a Climate Action Plan (CAP). If available at the time of the analysis, a consistency analysis with the draft CAP's GHG reduction measures will be conducted for the proposed Project. Additional measures included in the draft CAP will be considered for inclusion in the Project. c. Biological Resources The project site is currently developed as a parking lot and the surrounding area is predominantly urbanized. As such, the potential for sensitive wildlife and plant species is low. PlaceWorks will- coordinate with the City's arborist to analyze potential impacts to biological resources drawing on information contained in existing City environmental documents, including the draft biological resource section of the General Plan EIR. d. Cultural Resources Tom Origer&Associates (TOA) will incorporate their work on the General Plan EIR (Archival research and field survey) to analyze potential impacts to cultural resources. They will supplement their work by updating the Native American contact; compiling information from the General Plan EIR into a report suitable for the hotel project and provide project specific analysis and recommendations. April 29, 2014 1 Page 7 e PLACEWORKS e. Geology and Soils PlaceWorks will analyze potential geological and soil-related impacts based on the project geotechnical report to be provided by KCR. If a project report is not available PlaceWorks will analyze potential impacts on readily available geologic information. f. Hazards and Hazardous Materials PlaceWorks will review the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment provided by KCR to address hazards and hazardous materials issues on the project site and in the surrounding area. g. Hydrology and Water Quality PlaceWorks will evaluate potential impacts from project implementation related to hydrology, water quality, and storm-water runoff. NPDES Municipal Permit conditions and Cupertino Code would require stormwater treatment and control. h. Land Use and Planning PlaceWorks will evaluate the proposed project's relationship to surrounding land uses and consistency with relevant adopted policy documents, including the City of Cupertino General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. We will also discuss the proposed land use designations and policies addressing future development in the Vallco District, as well as the recommendations on improving future mobility and connectivity to be prepared by MIG. i. Noise PlaceWorks will prepare noise and vibration analyses to evaluate potential impacts resulting from temporary construction activities at the existing site, as well as long-term operation of the proposed hotel project.The noise analysis will evaluate potential stationary noise impacts based on the City of Cupertino noise and vibration impact thresholds. PlaceWorks will assess existing conditions and identify the nearest sensitive receptors and other pertinent community characteristics; based on aerial photography, site plans, and project site photos. Potential temporary noise and vibration impacts to nearby sensitive receptors (almost exclusively single-family residences) during construction of the proposed facilities will be evaluated using published data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Impacts will be based on the magnitude of noise generated, the duration of construction activities, and the time of day construction activities would occur. This will be accomplished using the construction schedule and equipment list provided by the applicant. It is assumed that there will be one demolition/construction phase for the development of the hotel project. The primary source of long-term, operation noise associated with the proposed new hotel usage will be vehicle traffic on adjacent streets, and 1-280. Potential traffic noise increases to nearby uses will be calculated using a version of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) traffic noise prediction model and will be based on the average daily roadway segment volume forecasts and speeds provided to PlaceWorks in the traffic impact analysis prepared for the project. Land use compatibility relative to community noise will be assessed using future traffic noise projections for pertinent local roads and freeways (most notably, 1-280 Freeway North Wolfe Road). Also, for the long-term noise impacts April 29, 2014 Page 8 PLACEWORKS related to the operation of stationary equipment such as the rooftop heating, ventilation, and air conditioning units, impacts onto adjacent land uses will be analyzed. Potential noise and vibration impacts will be evaluated according to applicable City of Cupertino noise and vibration criteria included in the General PIC-3n and the Municipal Code. Mitigation measures to reduce noise and vibration impacts will be recommended, as necessary, to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. The findings of thi-r noise and vibration analyses will be summarized in the MND and pertinent technical details and calculation data sheets to support the noise analysis presented in.the environmental document will be included as an appendix. j. Population and Housing PlaceWorks will summarize the population, employment, and housing impacts that would result from the project, including an assessment of indirect impacts associated with projected growth. k. Public Services, Parks, and Recreation PlaceWorks will contact police and fire service providers to identify concerns about the project and the potential need for expanded public services. `since the project does not propose the construction of housing, it would not directly induce growth; however,the potential impacts to schools, parks, and libraries in the city that could result from indirect growth associated with jobs created through project operations will be considered in the Initial Study. I. Transportation PlaceWorks will summarize the findings from the TIA prepared by Hexagon in Task 6, described above. Hexagon will recommend mitigation measures if required to mitigate project impacts 1 m..Utilities PlaceWorks will contact the service providers to identify concerns about the project and evaluate potential impacts related to water supply and infrastructure, stormwater infrastructure, and solid waste disposal. 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration Preparation If it is determined that potential impacts from construction or operation of the project can be avoided through changes to the project, or mitigated to less-than-significant levels in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15070, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)would be prepared. In the event that the Initial Study determines the project would result in one or more significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level, an EIR is required under CEQA. PlaceWorks will be available to prepare an EIR, if required, subject to a contract modification providing scope and budget for this additional service. If an EIR is required, PlaceWorks would leverage the comprehensive Initial Study Prepared under Task C.1 above to scope out impact areas where no significant impact would result so as to focus the EIR on key issues. April 29, 2014 I Page 9 PLACEWORKS 3. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Delivery One Administrative Draft Initial Study (ADIS) will be prepared and submitted to the City for comment. PlaceWorks will then revise the ADIS addressing City comments and deliver a Screen Check Draft IS, prior to the Final Draft IS. The ADIS will be completed within eight (8) weeks of finalization of the Project Description, and the Screen Check Draft IS will be completed within one (1) week of receiving comments from the City. The Final IS will be completed one (1) week after receipt of edits to the Screen Check Draft IS. Assuming that potential project impacts can be avoided through changes to the project, or mitigated to less-than-significant levels, we will submit an electronic copy of a Draft MND within one (1)week of receiving direction from the City for public distribution. 4. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Preparation and Delivery Concurrent with the preparation of the Draft MND, we will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the mitigation measures included in the MND pursuant to the City's policies and procedures. The MMRP, shown in tabular form, will identify responsibility for implementing and monitoring each mitigation measure, along with monitoring triggers and reporting frequency. Task D. Public Review and Responses to Comments Assuming that an IS/MND will be prepared and publicly distributed for the project; a 30-day public review period will be required under CEQA. City staff will be responsible for noticing and distribution of the CEQA document to public agencies. Following the close of the public review period, PlaceWorks will respond to substantive comments received on the IS/MND in a memorandum form. We will prepare one Draft for review and comment by City staff, and then revise the Draft to address City comments, and deliver a Final Response to Comments Memo. J Task E. Adoption Steve Noack will attend one meeting each with the Environmental Review Committee, Planning Commission,and City Council to respond to questions on the results of the MND. Schedule, Products, and Meetings This section describes the products associated with PlaceWorks' work scope and the schedule by which each of these products will be completed. It also summarizes the meetings that PlaceWorks will attend for the project. PlaceWorks staff includes Steve Noack as the Principal-in Charge, and Kyle Simpson,Associate, as the Project Manager. SCHEDULE PlaceWorks' proposed schedule for completion of CEQA Review for the Vallco Hotel Project is shown in Figure 1. As shown in the schedule, we anticipate that the project can be completed by September April 29, 2014 1 Page 10 PLACEWORKS 2014, within 5 months of receiving Notice to Proceed from the City. We believe this schedule is in keeping with your needs, but we are happy to revise this schedule if necessary. PRODUCTS The following products will be submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Division in fulfillment of our proposed scope of work: • Draft and Final Project Description • Draft T'IA Report Im Final TIA Report Administrative Draft IS/MND/MMRP Screencheck IS/MN'D/MMRP Final Draft IS/MND/MMRP Im Draft Response to Comments Memo Final Response to Comments Memo MEETINGS Steve Noack, Kyle Simpson of PlaceWorks will attend the project kick-off meeting. Steve Noack will attend the ERC meeting. He is available to attend the Planning Commission and City Council meetings at the discretion of City staff,on a time and materials basis. April 29, 2014 1 Page 11 Figure 1 Exhibit B KCR Hotel Project Review Schedule PlaceWorks Start Finish Duration R (weeks) 06 77: 1 111 FTaskA. Project Initiation May-2014 May-2014 2 Start Up Meeting/Site Visit May-2014 May 2014 0 Project Description May-2014 May-2014 2 Task B. Traffic Impact Analysis May-2014 Jul-2014 8 Traffic Impact Analysis May-2014 Jun-2014 5 ' Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report Delivered Jun-2014 Jun-2014 0 Review by City Staff Jun-2014 Jun-2014 2 Final Traffic Impact Analysis Report Jul-2014 Jul-2014 I Task C. Environmental Review May-2014 Aug-2014 12 ' Initial Study/MND Preparation May-2014 Jul-2014 8 Administrative Draft IS/MND Delivered Jul-2014 Jul-2014 0 Review by City Staff Jul-2014 Jul-2014 2 Screencheck IS/MIND Preparation and Delivery Jul-20 14 Jul-201 4 1 Final Draft IS/MND/MMRP Preparation and Delivery Jul-2014 Jul-2014 I , , , i i i 1 Task F. Public Review& Response to Comments Jul-2014 Sept-2014 6 CEQA Mandated 30-Day Public Review Period Jul-20 14 Aug-2014 4 Prepare Draft Response to Comments Memo Aug-2014 Aug-2014 I Review by City Staff Aug-2014 Aug-2014 0.5 , , , Per are and Deliver Final Response to Comments Memo Aug-2014 Aug-2014 0.5 Task G. Adoption Jul-2014 Sept-2014 7 Environmental Review Committee Jul-2014 Jul-2014 Planning Commission Meet' ingi Jul-2014 Jul-2014 1 City Council Hearing Sept-2014 Sept-2014 Exhibit C '"' PLACEWORKS Cost Estimate As shown in Table 2, the estimated cost to complete the scope of work described in this proposal is $77,375. The PlaceWorks team will complete this scope of work for a fixed fee not to exceed this amount. We are flexible regarding project costs and hope that you will not eliminate-us from consideration on the basis of cost alone. PlaceWorks bills for its work on a time-and-materials basis with monthly invoices. We recommend planning for a 5 percent to 10 percent contingency fund to cover any unforeseen out-of-scope work that might be necessary for the project. ASSUMPTIONS This scope of work and cost estimate assumes that: IM Billing rates for this project are guaranteed through June 2015. Billing rates would be subject to an increase on July 1, 2015, and in each subsequent year thereafter. A budget increase would be necessary to cover costs incurred after July 1, 2015. im o Up nine intersections will be evaluated in Hexagon's Traffic Impact Analysis. Our cost estimate includes the meetings shown in Chapter 4. Additional meetings would be billed on a time-and-materials basis. Steve Noack and Kyle Simpson will attend all project meetings, and Steve Noack will attend all public hearings. We anticipate that each project meeting will last up to two hours.Subconsultant team members couild also attend additional meetings or hearings for an additional cost based on time and materials. No more than 40 hours of PlaceWorks' staff time will be required to respond to public comments on the Draft IS/MND. If additional labor is necessary, a contract amendment allowing additional work will be necessary. Five (5) printed copies of Administrative Draft products will be submitted to City staff for review. Screencheck drafts will be submitted in electronic (PDF) format. This scope assumes that 25 printed copies of Final Draft IS/MND will be delivered to City stuff for public distribution. The actual number of copies required will be clE�termined by City staff at a later date. If the City requires additional print or CD copies in excess of this assumption, additional printing costs will be billed at PlaceWorks'actual cost. City of Cupertino staff will be responsible for noticing and distribution of the CEQA document to public agencies as required under CEQA. April 29, 2014 1 Page 13 Table 2 KCR.Hotel Project Review Cost Estimate PlaceWorks Hexagon TOA Steve Senior Project Noack, Associate/ Associate Planner/ Project Graphics/ Hours per Task Principal Engineer Planner Designer Scientist WP Task A.Project Initiation 2 8 4 Task B.Traffic Impact Analysis 2 Task C.Environmental Review 24 16 80 160 50 8 Task D.Public Review and Response to Comments Memo 8 3 24 32 2 Task E.Adoption of CEQA Document 4 Project Management and Staff Meetings 8 32 Total Hours 46 19 146 192 50 14 Billing Rate $200 $165 $135 $105 $95 $80 Labor Cost $9,200 $3,135 $19,710 $20,160 $4,750 $1,120 Total Firm Labor Cost $58,075 $15,000 $875 EXPENSES Mileage(@$0.565 per mile) 100 Travel Subconsultant Administration(10%) 1,588 Deliveries 125 Office Expenses(Phone,Fax,Copies,etc.@ 2%of Labor) 1,162 Report Production 450 Total Expenses $3,425 TOTAL PER FIRM $61,500 $15,000 $875 GRAND TOTAL $77,375 4/29/2014 V '" PLACEWORKS Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need more information. The PlaceWorks team looks forward to working with you on this interesting and challenging project. Sincerely,. PLACEWORKS IJ Steve Noack,AICP Principal April 29, 2014 Page 15