The URL can be used to link to this page

Exhibit CC 11-3-14 Item No. 4 Santa Clara Water District PowerPoint, Monthly Status Report for OCt. 2014 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 ^ Santa Clara Valley Water District Update Cupertino City Council Nov. 3, 2014 SantaGaraV614 Director Nai Hsueh Woter©istrid SCVWD District 5 An integrated approach Mission: Providing Silicon Valley safe, clean water for a health life environment and economy Y HEALTHY CREEKS& FLOOD PR TECTIQU,""', ECOSYSTEMS J ..vq .,° k• fl't�I 1 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Who we serve 2 million people . 15 cities 4,700 well owners _ 13 water retailers 5 watersheds A comprehensive water system 10 reservoirs 3 pump stations a 800 miles of streams �h 142 miles of pipelines Santa 3 water treatment plants Clara 17 flood protection projects County 400 acres of recharge ponds 609 acres of restored habitat 100,000 parcels protected frorn flooding ' �.� 121 billion gallons annual water usage t 2 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 A comprehensive legislative strategy Strategic legislative engagement at all levels- Federal • State • Regional il y Vag, 5..'.0—Va1"Wa. ` • Local ImdWYwb.nMwrNb Mw.l. rapM s+Ai.f.Mr� r�rbViiw�� 9 !4`1rMaw.�+n`brwae.i �n v.MrIM •.. Board adopts principles and proposals annually b..•g w.yyw4ii aw.rLi +MYli..owew(w. Staff aggressively pursues - �- funding, authorization 2C4 i Estimated demands in Santa Clara County Agriculture 8% Dedicated Meter Landscape 6% II 3 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Where does our water come from? Santa Clara County 30%local water �a'�` i5°.�r�aturolgrctndwalOr t0%from reservoirs to groundwaw 5% from reservoirs to Local drinking rooter 10 dams and surface wate, }reatmenl plants N 55%imparted water I M's 1hru 00 ho to " � � —� repisnis#�grasaadv+rnex 25%thru 0els3 to drinking :� svatar treatment planes c+l ntS%recycled water 90% t� � • VJni=er Cn�r�s..�rvaG on N z .r� d n ry7 Conservation has become a way of life SCC Population and Water Use Over Time 1,900,000 — IKOW --...__.—........----- --. __.—... ,�°"f.__..... 400.000 1,700.000 ; 350,000 I I ., 1.6w.000; — — — -------------...----- 300000 . v i v C O N 1,500,000 '. 250,000 v O CL 0 i1.100.000 --___ _—_--...___`--_--._—.--..____...._—___.__—_---.__ ._---_._._..__...._......_......._.._....._._.. .200.000 I N 1.300.000 150.000 3 I 1,200,000 -- population --water use(AF) 1W,000 I I 1,100,000 - ------._....--------.._..--------.... ....---«50.000 1,000,000 ———— �-0 4 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Protecting our groundwater basin SANTA CLARA COUNTY GROUNDWATER AT-A-GLANCE wOM ATIMN s` 5��XMT?[' ✓ i GO ft Al J L,'d bn 3(em so I Million ran k -5th Ff Inc i<le oP <• California in severe drought U.S. Drought October 0 2014 +� (Reressost rn�,.��sy a�fQs�7 a;snsal V.W 8a.m.EDT California £tFSft$58.1Ykt'11'F+aiGix�d`--(cG aJa.at.Da,exk.. ,,,�yx-.r , � Cifl.D4 D7 Ai RtdJi tfsnawws.�SL43:. tt 41 0"Yea,AD. 252 $748 ?`.85 8 t2 j 51 36 fl:� %N-O"Anaaw 37,253,859 M D7 _nrerr ant 7:d3zaa'"C kda xt+A'Attusfs.R=tu98d3i.Fb M*w Cif WL4t3`C.XA Pass-j,,4>.C" Aut"is): 5 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Third dry year a cause of concern Projected End-of- Suggested Year Groundwater Short-Term Stage Title Storage (AF) Reduction in Water Use 1 Normal, Above 300,000 None 2 Alert 250,000 to 300,000 0 - 10% Severe 200,000 to 250,000 10 - 20%, 4 Critical 150,000 to 200,000 20 - 40% 5 Emergency Less than 150,000 Up to 50% Board Resolution,February 25,2014: NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Santa Clara Valley Water District that a water use reduction target equal to 20 percent of 2013 water use is called for through December 31.2014,and it is further recommended that retail water agencies,local municipalities and the County of Santa Clara implement mandatory measures as needed to achieve the 20 percen t wa er'use target. 'Retailer/City/County Calls for Reduction Cumulative Savings Water Retailer Action Monthly Savings Feb through Feb through for ug A2014 Sept 2014 Sept 2014 San Jose Water Co. Calling for 20% 10% 11% 14% Santa Clara(City) Calling for 20% 8% 8% 8% Sunnyvale Calling for 15% 14% 13% 12% San Jose Municipal Calling for 20% 12% 12% 12% California Water Service Calling for 20% 13% 13% 15% Palo Alto Calling for 10% 15% 15% 14% Mountain View Calling for 10% 14% 14% 13% Great Oaks Calling for 20% 14% 15% 19% Milpitas Calling for 20% 11% 11% 12% Gilroy Calling for 20% 12% 13% 17% Morgan Hill Calling for 20% 15% 15% 14% Purissima Hills Water Calling for 10% 14% Not Available Not Available Stanford Calling for 10% 8% Not Available Not Available Total 11% 12% 14% 6 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Strategic Legislative Efforts to Address the Drought • Federal: relief for Public Policy drought-stricken rm Fn 0D communities g g Q • State: Water Bond Strategy benefits for Silicon Valley Advocac • Local: funding, assistance y for drought efforts region- wide Strategy for drought Sue Water. LAMM- Many # 1 . Secure imported Save Money, REBATE RebateSIpO water supplies RROGRA1.DoUeLrol � � „ �:.- �' � #3. Optimize treated ;rr water quality and Wa� ttr-saFirsg suve us.org Yar'0rsaving avallabIllt y °e�atrspto;raes \� lips and iefas #4. Reduce 2014 water TRoIj use by 200 IS THE I&w GREEN #7. Advance long- term water : conservation � � F 7 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Strategy for drought.. .cont. #6. Minimize drought : impacts to stakeholders SEPTEMBER 2014 #8. Accelerate recycle water program #9. Maintain uniquely accessible District assets - #12. Secure legislative � support to offset ,, ' drought impacts, accelerate programs What can the community do? Act Now A 1 . Residential Programs - A 2. Landscape Programs 3. Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Programs 4. Agricultural Programs 11 � 5. Outreach/Education -- Drought Hotline: 408-630-2000 ' WWW.save20gallons.org CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Residential Programs Water-Wise House Call Program • Graywater Rebate Program r • High-Efficiency Toilet Rebate .' Program • High-Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Program • Landscape rebate program • Complimentary Low-Flow Showerhead and Aerator Program 17 Business Programs ,�.... ,'�r//.✓. ....... _ m � �r,,,..arr�`rNar �.,a� , �' ... . a{ . • Free High-Efficiency Toilets and Urinals - - • High-efficiency Clothes Washer Rebates- up to $400/washer '` • Submeter Rebates- up to $150/submeter • Custom / Measured Rebates • Rebates for Ice Machines, Food Steamers and Urinals • Free Pre-Rinse Sprayers 18 Page 18 9 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Planning for the future Double conservation by 2030 Double water recycling by 2025 NO ■ Secure imported water supplies Rebuild & repair ,�r V ' infrastructure Conservation has become a way of life SCC Population and Water Use Over Time 1.900.000- _.. -._ -_. 450.000 1,800.000 ...—__—............. —_ _.._-_........._......... °..`'..........___. 400.000 J� 1,700.000 350,000 1,600.000 --_........._......................._............____.........._....._..._.:............__._ ...................................................._...-_-- .._._.._+300.000 N 0 a) '0 1,500,000 — r:.r=, - 250.000 V � a CL a 0 1,000.000 =......._..._.................. .:.........._...._.._............................_.......----....._.._._._............_..........._._......_......_._...-..._..._.._....------- 200.00 0 � I 1,300,000 ------- 150,000 i 1.200.000 —population —water use(AFL_ 100,000 1,100,000 - --------._...._._..---`--- -- ----------- 50.000 1.000,000 T--•---- --•-------:.......:._.._......_.N�—..—.o O N N 10 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Purified water for today &tomorrow sihconvalley„ W .,_ � purewaterj.�,rg ak WM:ION,, low I�p�ni YOII�gN � Secure imported water supplies • -• • - • - • • • - as ••• 11 CC 11/3/2014 Item #4 Rebuild & repair original infrastructure A Water Treatment i A Plont z ;P, ., Questions and Answers www.valleywater.org/drought20l4/ Santa Clarca vr�!!ey Water District 12 F JifA-it t • • f� Executive Summary Water Tracker 1. Water Use Reductions A. District Water Use Efficiency Strategies B. San Francisco Public Utilities Commission In-county Water Supplies . C. Countywide Water Use and Savings • D. Recycled Water Production 2. Retailers Water Use and Savings • A. Water Savings by Retailer (Table) B. California Water Service Company C. Gilroy, City of D. Great Oaks Water Company . E. Milpitas, City of • F. Morgan Hill, City of G. Mountain View, City of H. Palo Alto, City of I. Purissima Hills Water Company • J. San Jose Municipal Water System • K. San Jose Water Company L. Santa Clara, City of M. Stanford University • N. Sunnyvale, City of 3. Water Conservation Measures A. Santa Clara Valley Water District B. Water Retailers (Table) C. Other Entities (non retailer cities, the County of Santa Clara, untreated surface water i users, independent wells) A. District Drought Response Strategies • A. Water supply and operations • B. Water use reduction C. Drought response opportunities D. Administrative and financial management • 5. Data Collection Methodology A. Water Use Data Disclaimer B. Treated Water Data C. Groundwater Data • D. SFPUC Water Data • E. Surface Water Data F. Recycled Water Use • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 1 i • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • This page intentionally left blank • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • 0 Am EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The purpose of this report is to provide a monthly water supply and water use reduction outlook in response to the 2014 Drought. The data and analysis provided includes local and imported water conditions, in addition to detailed monthly water use and savings by the county's major water retailers. Background On January 28, 2014, the Santa Clara Valley Water District's (district) Board of Directors (Board) a received the initial water supply outlook and set a preliminary water use reduction target equal to 10 • percent of 2013 countywide water use. On February 25, 2014, the Board approved a resolution • setting a countywide water use reduction target equal to 20 percent of 2013 water use through December 31, 2014, and recommended that retail water agencies, local municipalities and the County of Santa Clara (County) implement mandatory measures as needed to achieve the 20 percent water use reduction target. This action was based on the district's Water Shortage Contingency Plan and estimated 2014 water supply conditions that showed groundwater reserves would reach the 10 Stage 3 ("Severe') level by the end of the calendar year if water use reduction measures are not 0 implemented. • In February 2014, the district developed a strategic approach to respond to the drought and the • Board's call for water use reductions. A cross-functional team from across the organization was convened and the Drought Response Strategy was formulated. The district's comprehensive drought response is being implemented through fifteen strategies grouped into four general categories: (A) water supply and operations; (B) water use reduction; (C) drought response opportunities; and (D) administrative and financial management. The specific strategies are detailed in Section 4. Current Status • Severe drought conditions continue throughout California. With very little local watershed runoff, the • district's 10 reservoirs are 66 percent of their 20-year average October 1 storage level; 54 percent • of which is imported water. District reservoir levels are continuing to drop and creeks are continuing to dry back. Our largest local reservoir, Anderson Reservoir has been filled with imported water to ensure adequate treatment plant supplies this summer. Lowest storage levels are in Chesbro, Uvas, Guadalupe, and Stevens Creek reservoirs at 1%, 4%, 6%, and 8%of their total capacities, respectively. At the same time that groundwater recharge has been reduced due to limited surface water availability, groundwater pumping has increased in some areas to meet Santa Clara County water needs. This resulted in groundwater levels in the Santa Clara Plain groundwater basin • dropping to 39 feet lower than the five-year average. The district has been working with water retailers, municipalities and the County to increase water conservation efforts and public outreach, and to implement other actions to reduce water use. Through these efforts, preliminary water use data from February through September 2014 indicate • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 3 swim= that cumulative countywide savings of approximately 12 percent was realized, compared to the same period in 2013. Local water retailers have responded to the district's call in various ways. Several retailers are calling for 20 percent reductions and have activated or adopted water use restrictions. Common SFPUC retailers are calling for 10 to 15% percent voluntary. Most water retailers are taking • additional action to respond to the State Water Resources Control Board's Emergency Regulations • that were adopted in July 201 A. Nearly every water retailer is increasing their outreach and education efforts. i Report Format The remainder of this report includes our monthly Water Tracker report that contains a summary and assessment of trends in water supply and use in Santa Clara County. Water use and savings report for the county and the individual retailers follow. Water use and savings calculations and graphs represent the period of February to December as there was no call for short-term reductions for the month of January. 2013 data is provided for comparison as it is the base year set for water savings • calculations. • Disclaimer The data presented within this report is preliminary and subject to change. The data is presented prior to complete QA/QC and validation in an effort to quickly identify trends in water supply conditions and water use within the county. Due to the critical nature of the 2014 drought, it is important that the district and the community have an understanding of conditions and effectiveness of water conservation efforts. Please see the Data Collection Methodology section at the end of this report for further description and disclaimers regarding the water use data reported herein. The • water use data presented in the monthly reports are based on water retailer water use, which • comprises just above eighty percent of countywide water use. The remaining water use consists of • small or independent groundwater well users, district untreated surface water customers and recycled water. 4 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • • • • • October 2014 Santa . . . Water Disifkt 0 A monthly assessment of trends in water supply and use for Santa Clara County, California F r a. at , • Outlook as of October 1, 2014 • Drought continues throughout the state and groundwater levels in the County continue to decline. Cumulative 2014 • water savings through August are estimated at 11% compared to 2013 usage, which is less than the 20%water use reduction target set by the Board in February. The county is projected to draw down groundwater storage by • 100,000 acre-feet this year, resulting in a projected start to 2015 with the groundwater basin at the "Severe" level. • As it will take time to replenish the groundwater basin, even with median conditions (50%exceedance probability), . the call for some level of water use reduction is expected to continue into 2015. On September 26th, the Governor signed the three bills to create a framework for sustainable, local groundwater management for the first time in • California history. The bills establish a definition of sustainable groundwater management and require local agencies to adopt management plans for the state's most important groundwater basins, including the subbasins in Santa Clara • County. • • Weather Rainfall in San Jose • Month of September = 0.35 inches • Total to date = 0.35 inches or 1 12%of average to date (Rainfall year is July 1 to June 30) • The average daily high temperature for September was 78 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperatures were slightly below normal for the month • • L Total October 1 storage Local Reservoirs ' 9 e = 59,500 acre-feet* • » 66%of 20-year average for this date • » 35%of total capacity » 48%of restricted capacity storage (169,009 acre-feet total storage capacity limited by • seismic restrictions to 122,924 acre-feet) • Lowest storage levels are in Uvas, Guadalupe, and Stevens Creek reservoirs at 4%, 6%, and • 8%of their total capacities, respectively. The water level in Chesbro is below the inlet pipe . *Total includes approximately 54% imported water (none stored in the month of September) • Imported Water 2014 State Water Project (SWP) and Central Valley Project (CVP) allocations: • SWP allocation: 5% = 5,000 acre-feet(20%of allocation [1,000 acre-feet] may be delivered in summer, 80%after September 1) • CVP allocations: 50% for Municipal and Industrial uses and Zero%for Irrigation for a total • of 65,000 acre-feet • 2013 SWP and CVP estimated carryover supplies to 2014: 31,200 acre-feet • • Reservoir storage information, as of October 1, 2014: » Shasta Reservoir at 25%of capacity (42%of average for this date) • Oroville Reservoir at 30%of capacity (49%of average for this date) • San Luis Reservoir at 22%of capacity (45%of average for this date) • Semitropic groundwater bank reserves: 262,665 acre-feet at start of year. Withdrawal of • banked reserves may be limited by SWP operational constraints, with the available quantity to be determined; California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project initiated to expand exchange • potential with the CVP. • • No imported water management agreements executed in September; continuing to pursue several potential agreements • Estimated Hetch Hetchy deliveries to Santa Clara County: » Month of September = 5,200 acre-feet • » 2014 Total = 36,500 acre-feet, or 93% of the five-year average • 2014 preliminary reduction = 10%voluntary announced by SFPUC on January 31 continued on back ► • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 5 Treated Water Below average demands of 9,690 acre-feet delivered in September • • This total is 74% of the five-year average for September S • Estimated year-to-date = 74,000 acre-feet or 78%of the five-year average • Groundwater Groundwater Storage: Total storage at the end of 2014 is projected to fall within Stage 3 • (Severe) of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan. If the 20%water use reduction target set by the Board on February 25 is achieved, 2014 end of year storage is projected to be • within range of Stage 2 (Alert) • Santa Clara Plain: • The September managed recharge estimate is 400 acre-feet. The year-to-date managed • recharge estimate is 10,000 acre-feet, or 23% of the five-year average • The September groundwater pumping estimate is 10,000 acre-feet. The year-to-date groundwater pumping estimate is 91,100 acre-feet, or 138%of the five-year average • The groundwater level in Santa Clara Plain (San Jose) is about 29 feet lower than last year and about 39 feet lower than the five-year average • • Coyote Valley: » The September managed recharge estimate is 540 acre-feet. The year-to-date managed recharge estimate is 5,400 acre-feet, or 54%of the five-year average • » The September groundwater pumping estimate is 1,000 acre-feet. The year-to-date groundwater pumping estimate is 7,900 acre-feet, or 85%of the five-year average • » The groundwater level in Coyote Valley is about 9 feet lower than last year and 11 feet lower than the five-year average • Llagas Subbasin: . • The September managed recharge estimate is 500 acre-feet. The year-to-date managed recharge estimate is 6,200 acre-feet, or 32%of the five-year average • The September groundwater pumping estimate is 4,100 acre-feet. The year-to-date • groundwater pumping estimate is 31,500 acre-feet, or 96%of the five-year average » The groundwater level in Llagas Subbasin (San Martin) is about 20 feet lower than last • year and 30 feet lower than the five-year average Conserved Water • Saved 59,300 acre-feet in FY14 from long-term program (baseline year is 1992) • Long-term program goal is to save nearly 63,000 acre-feet in FYI • • Based on the District's Water Shortage Contingency Plan, the Board set a 2014 water use reduction target of 20%, in addition to long-term program savings • • Currently achieving an 1 1% reduction compared to 2013 (through August 2014) • Recycled Water • Estimated September 2014 production = 2,5 97 acre-feet (billed semi-annually) • • Estimated year-to-date = 17,879 acre-feet or 137%of the five-year average • Silicon Valley Advanced Water Purification Center produced 1,124 million gallons of advanced purified recycled water since 3/25/14. The purified water is blended with existing tertiary recycled water for South Bay Water Recycled Program's customers. • �s • s t � ' �� • • virM°'w"n r • p••'yam""�—�'"'-_�.- ^��- To get eNews,email • info@4Ileywatenorg S 6 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • • Section Water • • • The district and its water retailers have a long history of implementing water conservation and water • use efficiency in Santa Clara County (county). Because of the investments the water district and its • water retailers have made in water conservation since 1992, water use in the county has remained • relatively flat despite a 25 percent increase in population over the same time period. • • • Population and Water Use Over Time • 1,900,000 — -- ------- - 450,000 • 1,800,000 -- -- 400,000 • 1 ^ • 1,700,000 1 350,000 • 1,600,000 � 300,000 � 0 2 • C 1,500,000 50,000 M � v • 75 1,400,000 ! 200,000 N CL • 0-0 1,300,000 F 150,000 � ++ • 1,200,000 — - - 100,000 j • 1,100,000 -- — -- -- --- ---- ---- 50,000 • 1,000,000 __-_-____ _ ___ _ .-_-- _ __ --- _- - -.-_ 0 00• N F+ H N N F+ N N N N N N t0 l0 t0 l0 W t0 l0 O O O O O • 0 W 00 00 00 N Vo W O O O 0 I-A W O W � lD N � 00 N A V O W • —population —water use (AF) • • Figure 1 Population and Water Use • A. District Water Use Efficiency Strategies • This section provides the context of the district's existing long-term conservation programs to the • current efforts in response to the 2014 Drought. • • Long-term Water Conservation • The district's 2012 Water Supply and Infrastructure Master Plan (Water Master Plan) acknowledges • that further investments are needed to ensure adequate water supply reserves in drought years. The • Ensure Sustainablllty strategy adopted by the Board calls for nearly doubling current levels of conservation from 59,300 acre-feet per year to 99,000 acre-feet per year over the next 15 years, as well as other investments that will reduce the county's reliance on the San Francisco Bay Delta. All • future growth in county water demands will be met through water conservation and recycled water. is While the long-term Water Master Plan is being implemented, short-term gaps between annual 0 supply and demand can occur as seen in the current severe drought. These gaps are addressed • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 7 • o - - - • s - through the Board-adopted Water Shortage Contingency Plan'. The district and its major water retailers have a cooperative relationship in the implementation of a variety of water conservation programs in an effort to permanently reduce water use in Santa Clara County and are an important element in meeting long-term water reliability. Water conservation programs implemented since 1992 have had a large influence in continued demand reduction. This can be seen in Figure 1 with the relative stability of demands since the mid to late 1980s, even • though population has increased significantly during the same period (Figure 1). Using the year S 1992 as a baseline, the district saved 59,300 Acre Feet per Year (AFY) in year 2013, which is a little more than half of the district's long-term goal of 98,500 AFY by 2030. Short-term Water Use Reductions In addition to the district's long-term programs there are times, such as the current drought, when we need additional savings. When the district's Board calls for short-term water reductions, as was done in January and February of 2014, the cities and water retailers consider the implementation of • their water shortage contingency plan actions identified in their Urban Water Management Plans in • order to achieve the necessary shortage response. Actions to achieve the desired shortage response • may be different for each city/water retailer depending on service area composition (commercial, industrial, residential) and source of water supplies. However, some actions are common to several of the cities/water retailers, providing for more consistent implementation and messaging. Reducing water consumption during water shortages is generally achieved through behavioral changes. Short term reduction generally refers to these behavioral changes that reduce water use over and above long term conservation programs. In response to the unprecedented water shortage situation being experienced this year, the water • district is increasing and expanding its short-term measures and is strengthening efforts to foster its • partnerships with its water retailers to promote water conservation. To that end, the district is working closely with the water retailers on program development as well as water conservation outreach and education. Please see our website for more information on our long standing programs and new efforts and rebates available in response to the current drought. http://www.valleMater.org/programs/waterconservation.aspx State Water Resources Control Board Emergency Regulations • The State Water Resources Control Board emergency regulation to increase conservation practices • for all Californians became effective July 28, 2014. The new regulation targets outdoor urban water • use. This regulation establishes the minimum level of activity that residents, businesses and certain • 1 Santa Clara Valley Water District 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, • http://www.valleywater.org/Services/WaterSupplyPlanning.aspx] • 8 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • water suppliers must meet as the drought deepens and will be in effect for 270 days unless extended or repealed. The district does not have requirements under the new regulations since they apply primarily to water retailers. However, the district's aggressive drought response program that includes 15 strategies (See Section 4) includes coordinating with and supporting our local water retailers, cities, and the • County. To support the conservation goals of the district, the emergency regulations and our local • agencies, we have moved to Stage 2 Drought Response. Stage 2 includes expanding outreach and • marketing, establishing a centralized system to report water waste (Access Valley Water app), and hiring 5 to 10 water waste inspectors to follow-up on reports of water waste. Recycled Water/Water Re-use In addition to the district's water conservation programs, the water district has partnered with cities and water retailers in the county to develop recycled water supplies to reduce demand on potable supplies. Recycled water helps in times of drought as it is an all-weather reliable source of water. • Approximately five percent of the county's total water use currently consists of recycled water, limited . primarily to landscaping irrigation, agriculture irrigation, cooling towers, and industrial processes. • This usage is critical now and into the future to meet water supply reliability needs. For instance, 20,600 AF of recycled water was used in 2013 countywide, thereby preserving an equal volume of drinking water supplies. The district plans to increase recycled water used in this county to at least 10 percent (approximately 40,000 AF) by year 2025 and its long-term goal is 50,000 AF by year 2030. During this time of drought, water retailers and the district are continuing efforts to expand use of recycled water in response to decreasing availability of potable supplies. Recycled water use data at the retailer level is not available on a monthly basis for all retailers; however, the most current • information will be summarized in future Monthly Status Reports. • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 9 Water - Reductions Figure 2 Recycled Water Use 0 Countywide Recycled Water Use • 25,000 — — 20,000 - • 15,000 Q 10,000 • 5,000 - • 0 o o oti doti o ,o o 1 ,o o" do ,yo o0' do cl d;" o ti ti ,o ti', ,o" B. San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Supplies • Eight retail agencies in Santa Clara County contract with the SFPUC to receive water imported from the Tuolumne River watershed as well as from watersheds around the Bay Area. This imported water is conveyed through the regional water system owned and operated by the SFPUC. The district does not control or administer SFPUC supplies delivered to the county; however, this supply reduces the demands on district-supplied water. The estimated 2013 SFPUC water use in Santa Clara County is 54,600 acre-feet, or almost 15 percent of total use. • On January 31, 2014, the SFPUC officially asked all customers of the Hetch Hetchy Regional Water • System to voluntarily curtail water consumption. The goal is to reduce system-wide usage by 10 percent. The SFPUC recent) announced it will be enforcing the Jul 28 2014 State Water i P Y 9 Y � � • Resources Control Board's emergency regulations through education, notices, and warning to customers. Repeated water waste after receiving notice and warnings from the SFPUC could result in a fine. On August 12, 2014, the SFPUC passed new emergency outdoor irrigation restrictions for all of its retail customers to reduce potable water use by 10% for outdoor irrigation of ornamental landscape and turf. Since some of the Santa Clara County water retailers rely on SFPUC for some, or all, of their supplies, they are calling forl0 percent reductions (or more in some locations) in their • service areas. • • 10 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Y � at • C. Countywide Water Use Savings The district has reviewed water use data through September 2014 from the major water retailers in Santa Clara County. The results of the analysis indicate a water use savings are remaining fairly stable at 11 percent for several months, with a slight increase in September. As of the end of September 2014, the cumulative savings since the district's first call for savings on January 28, 2014, is approximately 12 percent. (Some of the smaller water use retailers with SFPUC deliveries do • not have their September water use numbers available due to SFPUC meter read schedule: mid • October) The following pages contain more detailed water use and savings information for combined major retail water providers. Section 2 contains retail water provider water use and savings data and analysis reports. Please see Section 5, Data Collection Methodologies for explanation and disclaimers. Water Savings Target and Calculations On February 25, 2014, the Board approved a resolution setting a countywide water use reduction • target equal to 20 percent of 2013 water use, and recommending that retail water agencies, municipalities and the County implement mandatory measures as needed to accomplish that target. S This action was based on the district's Water Shortage Contingency Plan and estimated 2014 water supply conditions that showed groundwater reserves could reach the Stage 3 ("Severe") level by the end of the calendar year if water use reduction measures are not implemented. Because the call for 20 percent savings was not made until the end of February, the water savings S target presented in this report do not include a target for January 2014. Additionally, the savings • target presented in this report for the month of February is 10 percent, as the Board set a preliminary • target of 10 percent at its January 28, 2014 meeting. This monthly water use and savings report only contains data and progress towards the savings target for large water retailers, and does not provide a complete accounting of countywide water use. Recycled water use is not subject to the water savings target because it is used in lieu of other potable • water supplies. Recycled water is used primarily for irrigation, industry and agriculture. Using • recycled water helps conserve drinking water supplies, provides a dependable, drought-proof, • locally-controlled water supply, reduces dependency on imported water and groundwater and helps preserve our saltwater and tidal habitat by reducing freshwater discharge to the bay. A small, but important and growing source of water is recycled water. 0 0 0 0 • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 11 Water Use Reductions TOTAL COUNTY WATER USE BY MAJOR RETAILERS 2013 (Base Year) and 2014 (Reporting Year) in Acre Feet North South 2013 2013 • County County Treated S1WC Cumulative 2013 SFPUC Monthly Ground- Ground- Water Surface Use Feb to • water water Total Dec January water use values are NOT used in water savings calculations or cumulative use values. • Jan 3,051.8 1,191.7 i 5,723.5 j 3,453.9! 1,807.1 I 15,227.1 i 15,227.1 • Feb 3,201.0 1,208.5 6,600.4 3,672.5 1,384.8 16,067.2 16,067.2 Mar 5,723.3 1,585.7 8,142.8 3,600.0 594.9 19,646.6 35,713.8 • Apr 6,553.6 1,906.2 10,607.8 4,700.3 422.2 24,190.1 59,903.9 • May 8,413.6 2,314.3 13,320.1 5,872.7 298.6 30,219.3 90,123.1 Jun 8,933.8 2,311.7 13,421.0 5,328.3 516.2 30,510.9 120,634.1 • Jul 10,577.6 2,613.8 13,261.5 5,769.2 6163 1 32,838.4 153,472.5 Aug 9,946.1 2,399.5 13,271.2 6,166.7 584.1 32,367.6 185,840.0 • Sep 7,954.0 2,305.2 12,527.9 4,939.3 530.6 28,257.0 214,097.0 • Oct 8,071.5 2,153.7 11,284.3 4,641.1 501.5 26,652.1 240,749.1 Nov 6,825.3 1,692.3 8,485.1 3,635.9 326.0 20,964.5 261,713.6 • Dec 6,849.9 1,397.7 6,963.9 3,117.2 202.8 18,531.5 280,245.1 • Feb to Sept 2013 Totals 61,303.0 16,644.9 91,152.7 40,048.8 4,947.6 214,097.0 Feb to Dec 83,049.7 21,888.6 117,886.0 51,443.0 5,977.9 280,245.1 2013 Totals • • North South 2014 2014 Cumulative% • County County Treated SJWC Cumulative Savings from • 2014 SFPUC Monthly Ground- Ground- Water Surface Use Feb to 2013 water water Use Dec <+>savings • January water use values are NOT used in water savings calculations or cumulative use values. Not • Jan 6,482.0' 1,508.7•. 7,908.0 3,631.3 •. 0.3 19,530.3 19,530.3 Applicable Feb 5,767.2 1,164.3 4,998.0 2,616.7 0.3 14,546.5 14,546.5 1 9% Mar 7,339.0 1,305.2 5,538.0 3,011.0 113.4 17,306.7 31,853.2 11% Apr 8,258.8 1,521.2 6,298.2 4,047.5 110.0 20,235.7 52,088.9 13% • May 11,275.9 2,166.5 8,515.2 5,250.0 54.9 27,262.5 79,351.4 12% • Jun 11,715.7 2,301.6 9,388.1 4,539.0 4.6 27,949.0 107,300.3 11% Jul 12,426.3 2,233.6 9,628.9 5,069.4 9.8 29,368.0 136,668.4 11% • Aug 10,650.7 2,154.8 10,192.9 4,456.6 404.9 27,860.0 164,528.4 11% Sep 9,266.1 1,974.2 9,066.5 3,671.7 9.8 23,988.3 188,516.7 12% • Oct - - - - - Nov - • Dec - - - - Feb to Sept 76,699.6 14,821.4 63,625.8 32,662.0 707.8 188,516.7 • 2014 Totals • %Savings by • Source of -25% 11%1 I 3011, 18% 86% 12% • Supply Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. • These water use data sets do not include recycled water or surface water sales by the District • Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative total from February to current month Savings Target for February is 10%. March through December is 20%of 2013 monthly use • • • 12 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • • Water Use Reductions • • TOTAL COUNTY WATER USE BY MAJOR RETAILERS • Major Retailers i 2013-2014 February to December • Cumulative Water Use and Savings Target • 300,000 i 250,000 — -- 200,000 a � • ;v 150,000 u � • ,' 100,000 � • 50,000 ' • • Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • 2014 Cumulative target --2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec --2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Current Month i • • Major Retailers • 2013-2014 February to December • Monthly Water Use and Savings Target • 35,000 • I 1 r , 30,000 1 I • I I I I I I I I � • 25,000 • 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 20,000 I 1 I I I I 1 i Q I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I • 15,000 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 J I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 • J I I I I I I I I I I 10,000 • 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 • S,000 • I I I I I I I I I I 1 • _€ _€_ _ _ I_ _ Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Z 2013 Monthly Total Monthly Target 2014 0 2014 Monthly Use • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 13 ' .. .� TOTAL COUNTY WATER USE BY MAJOR RETAILERS 2013 Feb to Sept Sources Used r19,Y, ■North County •' Ground-water • ■South County • Ground-water Treated • Water ■SFPUC SJWC Surface , m 2014 Feb to Sept Sources Used Compared to Same Period 2013 ■North County • 0% Ground-water ■South County • Ground-water ■Treated Water • ■SFPUC a SJWC Surface • Water Use Savings 2014 Feb to Current Month 0. • 14 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Water e Reductions w 0 COUNTY WIDE RECYCLED WATER PRODUCTION 2013-2014 • North County South County Palo Alto Sunnyvale 2013 Monthly 2013 Cumulative • 2013 Recycled SBWRP Recycled SCRWA Prodcution Feb to WTP WTP WTP WTP Production Dec . Jan 552.70 95.4 184.5 58.2 890.8 Feb 688.70 113.2 177.7 52.0 1,031.6 1,032 • Mar 819.1 140.7 177.9 61.4 1,199.1 2,231 Apr 1,203.0 195.4 194.9 60.6 1,653.9 3,885 May 1,574.3 205.7 189.5 51.6 2,021.1 5,906 • Jun 1,718.3 245.3 180.7 53.6 2,197.9 8,104 Jul 1,985.0 284.5 222.1 62.8 2,554.4 10,658 • Aug 1,824.8 230.5 263.5 57.6 2,376.4 13,034 • Sep 1,629.6 157.1 247.5 56.0 2,090.2 15,125 Oct 1,412.0 115.8 245.4 53.7 1,826.9 16,952 • Nov 993.1 113.7 218.7 53.7 1,379.2 18,331 • Dec 894.9 142.2 220.5 37.2 1,294.8 19,626 Feb to Dec 2013 14,742.8 1,944.1 2,338.4 600.2 19,625.5 • Totals • I Feb to Current 9,813.2 1,415.3 1,406.3 399.6 13,034.4 Month Totals • • 0 North County South County 2014 Cumulative Palo Alto Sunnyvale 2014 Monthly 2014 Recycled SBWRP Recycled SCRWA Prodcution Feb to i WTP WTP WTP WTP Production Dec • • Jan 851.92 116.67 280.01 51.60 1,300.20 Feb 585.2 108.0 249.4 52.7 995.35 995 • Mar 870.3 134.7 271.6 60.4 1,337.03 2,332 Apr 1,115.7 150.2 281.0 64.6 1,611.40 3,944 • May 1,716.4 196.8 318.5 61.5 2,293.15 6,237 • Jun 1,850.0 230.2 283.8 123.8 2,487.78 8,725 Jul 2,062.9 251.8 313.6 129.3 2,757.64 11,482 • Aug 1,869.9 214.9 317.4 103.8 2,505.97 13,988 • Sep Oct • Nov Dec - - - - • Feb to Dec 2014 10,070.4 1,286.5 Z035.3 596.1 13,988.3 995.4 Totals • of 1013 to DATE 1 103% 91% 145% 149% 107% • • • • • 0 • • • • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 15 � 0 • Water Reductions w COUNTY WIDE RECYCLED WATER PRODUCTION 2013-2014 w • Historic Countywide Recycled Water Procuction • 25,000 • 20,000 — w • • 15,000 w a a w LL U 10,000 - - -- w • • 5,000 - - • • 0 w 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 w • • 2013-2014 Recycled Water Production Cumulative (4 WTPs) • 22500 _ -- • 20000 - i 2013 Cumulative Prodcution Feb to Dec w do do 17500 X2014 Cumulative Prodcution Feb to Dec � w 15000 - •do a 12500 / w LL ' u 10000 w Q � • 7500 w 5000 • • 2500 0 w Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • • • 16 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT w • Section 2. Retailers' Water Use Reductions and Savings • This section contains detailed water use data from 2013 to 2014, summarizes cumulative water use • saving percent, and illustrates cumulative and monthly trends in water use and savings at the water • retailer level. [Please see Section 5, Data Collection Methodology for more information] Retailer Conservation Actions and Savings Summary Cumulative Cumulative Month to Percent Percent Month • Water Retailer Action Savings Feb Savings Feb through through Savings Sept 2014 Aug 2014 Sept 2014 • San Jose Water Calling for 20%; Activated CPUC rule 14.1: 10% 11% 14% Company restrictions Santa Clara, city Calling for 20%; 8% 8°% 8% • Permanent restrictions, plus additional measures Sunnyvale Calling for 15%; 14% 13% 12% Permanent restrictions, plus restrictions on • landscaping San Jose Considering 20%on 8/26/2014. 12% 12% 12% Municipal Water Permanent restrictions California Water Calling for 20%; Activated CPUC rule 14.1; 13% 13% 15% . Service restrictions • Palo Alto** Calling for 10%; 15% 15% 14% Permanent restrictions, plus additional stage 1 measures Mountain View Calling for 10%; 14% 14% 13% • Permanent restrictions plus some Stage 2 Great Oaks Calling for 20%; Activated CPUC rule 14.1: 14% 15% 19% r♦ restrictions • Milpitas Calling for 20%; 11% 11% 12% • Permanent restrictions, plus Stage 2 measures Gilroy Calling for 20%; 12% 13% 17% Permanent restrictions, plus Level 1 measures • Morgan Hill Calling for 20%; 15% 15% 14% • Permanent restrictions, plus Level 1 measures Purissima Hills Calling for 10%; 14% Not Available Not Available Water* Permanent restrictions • Stanford* Calling for 10% 8% Not Available Not Available • Total 11% 12% 14% *Purissima and Stanford have a late month meter read by SFPUC and August data is not available as of 1012112014 **Palo Alto September use estimated by Palo Alto • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 17 0 a Retailer Cumulative and Monthly Savings Summary Cumulative Water Retailer Feb to Feb to Feb to Feb to Feb to Feb to Feb to Savings Mar April May June July August September • San Jose Water Company 6% 10% 10% 9% 10% 10% 11% • Santa Clara (City of) 8% 9% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% • Sunnyvale 15% 17% 15% 14% 14% 14% 13% • San Jose Municipal Water 16% 18% 14% 12% 12% 12% 12% i California Water Service 15% 18% 19% 15% 13% 13% 13% • Palo Alto* * 25% 16% 17% 16% 13% 15% 15% • Mountain View 18% 18% 17% 14% 14% 14% 14% • Great Oaks 11% 16% 15% 13% 14% 14% 15% • Milpitas 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 11% 11% • Gilroy 11% 17% 14% 13% 12% 12% 13% • Morgan Hill 9% 15% 16% 16% 16% 15% 15% • Purissima Hills Water* 34% 28% 14% 14% 12% 14% Not Available • Stanford* 21% 15% 10% 10% 7% 8% Not Available • Combined Cumulative Savings 11% 13% 12% 11% 11% 11% 12% • Month to Month Water Retailer March Apr to May to June to July to August to September to • Savings to Mar Apr May June JJu August September San Jose Water Company 9% 16% 9% 7% 11% 13% 14% Santa Clara (City of) 9% 9% 3% 12% 6% 12% 8% Sunnyvale 14% 20% 12% 10% 13% 13% 12% San Jose Municipal Water 16% 20% 8% 5% 10% 12% 12% California Water Service 20% 20% 9% 8% 10% 13% 15% Palo Alto* * 19% 3% 18% 16% -1% 26% 14% Mountain View 13% 18% 14% 5% 14% 17% 13% Great Oaks 14% 22% 14% 8% 16% 17% 19% Milpitas 11% 10% 11% 8% 10% 13% 12% Gilroy 18% 24% 10% 7% 12% 12% 17% Morgan Hill 20% 23% 17% 14% 17% 13% 14% Purissima Hills Water * 23% 22% -19% 15% 5% 23% Not Available Stanford * 17% 7% -1% 10% -10% 17% Not Available Combined Month to Month Savings 12% 16% 10% 8% 11% 14% 14% * Not available due to late meter read schedule by SFPUC, and therefore data is not available as of 10/21/2014 **Palo Alto September use estimated by Palo Alto 18 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • California Water Service Company • 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Treated 2013 Monthly Treated 2014 Cumulative% • 2013 Groundwater Water Use Water Monthly Use 2014 Groundwater Savings Feb to December • ..:. :,s ore No,-di, . . 1+1=savings Jan 1 215.0 1 510.0 725.0 Jan 1 507.0 446.0 1 1 953-0 N/A Feb 254.0 477.0 731.0 Feb 459.0 160.0 619.0 15% Mar 446.0 544.0 990.0 Mar 550.0 238.0 788.0 18% • Apr 439.0 786.0 1,225.0 Apr 519.0 457.0 976.0 19% May 672.0 906.0 1,578.0 May 752.0 688.0 1,440.0 15% • Jun 709.0 930.0 1,639.0 Jun 548.0 967.0 1,515.0 13% Jul 690.0 1,049.0 1,739.0 Jul 576.0 985.0 1,561.0 13% • Aug 437.0 1,241.0 1,678.0 Aug 482.0 985.0 1,467.0 13% Sep 321.0 1,221.0 1,542.0 'Sep 337.0 971.0 1,308.0 13% • Oct 363.0 1,068.0 1,431.0 Oct - _ - Nov 183.0 844.0 1,027.0 Nov • Dec 262.0 626.0 888.0 Dec - - - Feb to Feb to • Current 3,968.0 7,154.0 11,122.0 Current 4,223.0 5,451.0 9,674.0 Month Month • February %Savings by Source to December 4,776.0 9,692.0 14,468.0 of Supply -6% 24% 13% • Total • Cal Water 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings • 16,000 • 14.000 _....... _. _.. __--__-- _____ _._. __ --__-.-.�.1. --------. 12,000 __.. - 10,000 ! ---.---- -- __. _. VP do do a1 8,000 ' • a 6,000 .-_._.__ __-.__------ • 4,000 - / ____._.........._......_......_....-._.____- __- 2,000 d. _-_.-.-_-_-_ ---_-.__-------------------- • -r Feb Mar Apr May T Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec - .2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target 42014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec Cal Water • --- 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 2.000 --- • aoo - r-1 _.-.-... .._....j-f --------_j 1 - -4 • .. ....... I I I I 1 I L I 1 1.400 1,200 .._..... ...._....... -- ........ 1 x-x -.._I %* I x xx X_: %x 1. x% • w 000 I I 1 . 1 1 I I I X X ' 1 - r_ LL %.X Y%- X x.% %-x %X t 1 1 I x 1 I xX I x x-x 1 a 800 l..Xxx - Ix x xx-x L bi I 1 _I 1 z.x zx x xx z-z x%-x xx I aM 600 1 x.X � .x XX '- { x.x 1 x Xx __ -__._-„ %.% Xx _ ., I x-x I I xx L�x 200 x X I X f xx- j %-X ---I ' <w xx f xX -- x-x x'x x-X m 'ss, Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • I7 2013 Monthly Use ©Monthly Savings Target IN 2014 Monthly Use • Notes • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February • Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable '-'Not Available 'Data supplied by retailer,not validated by SCVWD.In September 2014,all 2013 and 2014 water use figures were changed to match CalWater's self reporting values. SOnlO doro Val" • Wolef DISlr 6 M of 10/14/2014 • • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 19 Gilroy 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • • 2013 Monthly 2014 Monthly Cumulative% • 2013 Groundwater Use 2014 Groundwater Use Savings Feb to December • I (+1=savings nn_ 428.0 428.0 Jan 584.0 - - N/A • Feb 443.0 - - 443.0 Feb 433.4 - - 433.4 2% • Mar 623.0 - 623.0 Mar 511.9 - 511.9 11% Apr 751.0 751.0 Apr 570.5 570.5 17% • May 952.0 952.0 May 853.9 853.9 14% Jun 1,002.6 - 1,002.6 Jun 928.9 - - 928.9 13% • Jul 1,099.5 1,099.5 Jul 970.2 970.2 12% Aug 1,045.0 1,045.0 Aug 921.7 921.7 12% • Sep 950.0 950.0 Sep 785.3 785.3 13% Oct 856.0 856.0 Oct - - • Nov 632.0 - 632.0 Nov - - - - - Dec 541.0 - 541.0 Dec - - - • Feb to Current 6,866.1 6,866.1 Feb to Current 5,975.7 5,975.7 • Month Totals Month Totals February to %Savings by • December Total 8,895.1 8,895.1 Source of 131 13% Gilroy 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings • 9.000 .._....... --___-__-_-- _-.... � -_ 8.000 0 ... __.... - --___ -�y♦g-... _ ....... .._.._ e�• 7,000 • •egea � 6,000 ._..._ .... __ --_ -_-__ _.. ..a..�e•.� -� 5.000 - ..-__- a•-• _ -_.- -. _....-.. • .� 4,000 _ -- -_- ..... ....... •gg .3,000 -- _-- .... _- -_ _.. ...... __ ___ __ ............ 2,000 e g • 1,000 Feb Mar Apr T May Jun lul Aug Sep - Nov - Dec • -- ---- - - ••$2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target - -2014 Cumul.b ve Use Feb to Dec • Gilroy . 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings t,zoo -- • I-, 1.000 -_... _....... ............... .._.... _-J 1 I • r 1... I 1 r-1 1 800 -___-._- -_-______-_-__- __--___-_--......_i 1.... i x. i x x I kY .... ..... .__ • v x °•( u600 - -- - --- _ ...... ... .........._ 1 I I 1 I lux I 1 1 I I I ' • x v x YY xY a - 1 • x Y x x I I I 200 -1 .x ---1 a -----J x -1 x -t 1 1 1 xx Y[ 1 I I I I I i v-x I I x Cf I 1 I ---- Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OR Nov Dec • 112013 Monthly Use o Monthly Savings Target ■2014 Monthly Use •Notes Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January • Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(20 13) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable - Not Available • sarko Claim Valley INGtM DiArictt • As a(10/14/0 • • 20 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • 0 Great Oaks Water Company • 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Ground water Ground water 7-r,,L.1 2013 2014 Ground water Ground water 2014 Cumulative% 2013 Treated Water SFPVC Savings Feb to Zone 2 Zone 5 Monthly Use Zone 2 Zone 5 Monthly Use December 7",er+,i. _"r.,. ^^ ^,c .g- 1.1="vines h" 415,2 440.8 369.2 8100 NVA • Feb 277.6 376.7 654.3 Feb 276.3 330.1 606.4 7% Mar 430.5 409.7 840.2 Mar 373.0 349.3 722.3 11% • Apr 652.3 376.3 1,028.6 Apr 453.5 345.7 799.2 16% May 901.6 391.4 1,293.0 May 610.2 499.2 1,109.4 15% Jun 970.8 368.9 1,3397 Jun 678.8 555.4 1,234.2 13% Jul 1,056.8 366.9 = = 1,423.7 Jul 883.6 306.8 = 1,190.3 14% Aug 1,040.8 342.0 1,382.8 Aug 815.6 336.4 1,152.0 14% • Sep 882.6 368.9 1,251.5 Sep 689.1 328.9 1,018.0 15% Oct 751.0 359.7 1,110.7 Oct - - - • Nov 534.4 343.3 = = 877.7 Nov Dec 444.5 306.2 750.7 Dec - - • Feb to Feb to Current 6,213.0 3,000.8 9,213.8 Current 4,780.0 3,051.7 7,831.8 • Month Month Totals Totals February to %Savings • December 7,942.9 4,010.0 -1 11,952.91 by Source 23% -2% 15% Total lof Supply I • Great Oaks 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings • 12,000 --------------------------- 10,000 .................. ...........---............ • 8,000 do 00 do 6,000 -wwoo • all 4,000 40 2,000 . ...... Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug "P Oct Nov De, Dec • •2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Cumulative Savings Target 2014Cumulat,veuseFebto • Great Oaks 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 1,600 • 1,400 ------------------------- --------------------------------- 1,200 1 I I L- --A I 1,000 x x �x xx xx • X, -_,I 600 x X. x x • 4 u xx X, 11 :,x -x -.X. xx x-z DO x x I .x x x x x X x x I I I x 11 x". xx Xx xI :_Ix X 200 -4 X. .Xx X Ix --4 x x xs X I I xx x---x X. xx x x • xx x LL �L��; ..,--A-xx I xx xx Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug si,p Oct Nov Dec L 11 2013 Monthly Use 9 Monthly Savings Target - - 0-2014 Monthly Use • - ----------------------------- Notes Current monthly water use data Is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January • Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent Savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) • Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable • - Nat Available Santa Claic a • As of 10/14/2014 • • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 21 Milpitas, City 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Treated 2013 Monthly Treated 2014 Monthl Cumulative% • 2013 - SFPUC 2014 Groundwai-_ SFPUC Savings Feb to -- Water Use Water Use December • I ;.. :-alywotet values "use_i _ ",1 lot -MUlative cup- (+1=savings Jon 235 : 433.0 658.0 Jan 277.0 s 490 0 757.0 N/A Feb 228.0 478.0 706.0 Feb 249.0 376.1 625.1 11% . Mar 263.0 461.0 724.0 Mar 248.0 398.0 646.0 11% Apr 288.0 574.0 862.0 Apr 218.7 556.9 775.6 11% • May 323.0 770.0 1,093.0 May 131.9 835.9 967.8 11% Jun 310.0 705.0 1,015.0 Jun 338.9 591.0 929.9 10% Jul 377.0 764.0 1,141.0 Jul 365.2 662.1 1,027.3 10% Aug 298.0 855.0 1,153.0 Aug 651.3 353.5 1,004.8 11% Sep 182.0 1 743.0 925.0 Sep 281.4 531.4 812.8 11% Oct 228.0 731.0 959.0 Oct - - • Nov 253.0 541.0 794.0 Nov Dec 265.0 452.0 717.0 Dec - - - • Feb to Feb to • Current 2,269.0 5,350.0 7,619.0 Current 2,484.3 4,305.0 6,789.3 Month Totals Month Totals February to %Savings by • December 3,015.0 7,074.0 10,089.0 Source of -9% 20% 11% Total Supply • Milpitas • 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings 11,000 • _fir• 9,000 - - ___ •op dip dw 7.000 ...._.._._....._._...................................__.____._............_........_...._......_........................._...._._.__..................'.._........_... .1Lt♦11.......... ......_.__............+_............_.._............_ • 5,000 .-..-- ___.._....._......' _-. • a v ap 3,000 ��-��III • 100) ......... ....._.. ......... ___.__ ____ ____ _._.... ________- .__.... _____ _.__.___.._. ......_. ......... • (1,000) --'-Feb _Mar__... __A.pr....._------_---------May.......................Jun.........................Jul......_.._............_Au%.......................Sep.._..._...._......._Oct Nov.........................Dec__........ • e2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target yM2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Milpitas • 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 1,400 - _.___ _..__ -....... _._.... __..________ • 1,200 1,000 r-I I-1 • .____.--__._-_._ __._.__ I - 1 1..... 1 I ..................._. xx;E: I xx 1-1 I I • _ x 1 1 e: I x% A I 1 L 800 ..._ _-x„--.-_.I J a 1 t xx I x I I.x I xx 1 - 1 zx 1 z 1 Ixx 1 xx 1 I I • u 600 1 x _ 1 _1 Ixx I Ixx 1 T x% ...T ix ........t Ixx ..I xx - 1 x.x.... I .... ..... x-% 1 Ixx I x 1 %x I x-x a I x-x' 1 x% I x x I x x I x I x-% q, 1 400 J xx xz Ixz _..l Ixx _J x x-x 1 Ix.: I Ixx I I % 1 1 Ixx I 1 I • � x-x xx -. x x�x %x 1 x-x 1 xx 1 Izx I xx I wM 1 xs I Ixx 1 xx I x-x 200 -.I _I ..._...t Ixx 1 - I x xx %x ._..... .. xx x.% Ixx x �_ ---1 xx % 1 _I _I xz... .._ _ .. • z I xz 1 Ixx I Ixx I I %�' 1 I xx 1 I zx I xx x- x x x xx r x-x zx xx L_ L_.xx a+ x_.x __ x% nx ..._ %x_._... ,-t x.x x.x Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec . I I 1 2013 Monthly Use 9 Monthly Savings Target 0 2014 Monthly Use • Notes Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. • Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) . Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. • N/A=Not Applicable - Not Available SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savingsH • a As of 10/21/2014 • 22 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Morgan Hill, City • 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Treated Treated 2014 Cumulative% • 2013 20 2014 Groundwater SFPUC Other Savings Feb to -groundwater Water SFE�Lc Monthly Water Monthly Use December 'jo W=savine • ;23.o 323.,' Jon 547.0 547+0 NIA Feb 367.0 367.0 Feb 391.0 391.0 -7% Mar 528.0 528.0 Mar 423.8 423.8 9% Apr 748.0 748.0 Apr 576.0 576.0 15% • May 943.0 943.0 May 778.6 778.6 16% Jun 907.0 907.0 Jun 779.9 779.9 16% • Jul 1,116.0 1,116.0 Jul 922.6 922.6 16% Aug 976.0 976.0 Aug 850.6 P850.6 15% • Sep 955.0 955.0 Sep 825.9 825.9 15% Oct 894.0 894.0 Oct - - • Nov 665.0 665.0 Nov Dec 518.0 518.0 Dec - • Feb to Current 5400 6 Feb to current Month Totals 61 . ,540.0 Month Totals 5,548.3 5,548.3 February to %Savings by December 8,617.0 8,617.0 Source of 15% 15%1 Total Supply Morgan Hill 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings • 9,000 0 do 8,00 .......... ---------------------- ------------------------------ dw 7,000 dOP • dpp do V xI 6,000 dop do 5,000 -------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4,000 so 40 3,000 ............................................................... 2,000 ------------ 41110 1,000 • Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec *2013 cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target aWw2024 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Morgan Hill • 1,400 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings ......................................................... ---------- • 1,200 ------------------------.................................................. 1,000 -------------------------..................... ...... - ------------------ ------------------------------------------ xx x�,x TX 0! 600 x x x 1 x x x- 400 -A I .--------xx I I 1x--.1 x-x x-xx ............ x. I :"x x.-.xx .x-x. x: x. • U .:: I . 200 -1 . , I - I.. : �`-'x x x x xx.--xxxx -x x x .1 x -x Ix x. -x --x. x Lt;; I x x x.x xx.x Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 11 2013 Monthly use la Monthly Savings Target 13 2014 Monthly Use • Notes • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable Sarka - Not Available Wato Diskbild • As of 10/14/2014 • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 23 Mt. View 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • 2013 Groundwater Treated SFPUC Surface 2013 Monthly 2014 Groundwater Treated SFPUC Surface 2014 Monthly Cumulative% • Water water Use - Water Water Use Savings Feb to • December A- e,ulc c,Vo T g (,)=savings Jan 1 28,0 54.0 1 5 G 4,0 G46.1-, 7LI q 1) Feb 28.0 63.0 700.0 791.0 Feb 40.0 53.0 507.4 600.4 24% Mar 38.-0 85.0 655.0 778.0 Mar 45.4 60.0 574.6 680.0 18% Apr 35.0 110.0 886.0 1,031.0 Apr 49.1 106.9 694.5 850.4 18% • May 40.0 142.0 1,176.0 1,358.0 May 56.0 106.9 1,009.1 1,172.0 17% Jun 41.0 142.0 1,049.0 1,232.0 Jun 81.4 114.0 974.6 1,170.0 14% • Jul 29.0 155.0 1,177.0 1,361.0 Jul 61.2 126.1 983.5 1,170.8 14% Aug 30.0 152.0 1,183.0 1,365.0 Aug 119.4 118.2 890.4 1,128.0 14% • Sep 24.0 134.0 906.0 1,064.0 Sep 124.5 103.7 701.7 929.9 14% Oct 35.0 121.0 928.0 1,-0-8-4.0 Oct - - - • Nov 31.0 92.0 724.0 847.0 Nov Dec 30.0 79.0 611.0 720.0 Dec - - - - • Feb to Feb to Current 265.0 993.0 7,732.0 8,980.0 Current 577.0 788.8 6,335.8 7,701.6 Month Totals Month Totals • February to %Savings by December 361.0 2,275.0 9,995.0 11,631.0 Source of -118% 20% 18% 14% .Total Supply , 1 • Mountain View • 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings 12,000 7 --------- go 10,000 .............. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------do--dill dill 8,000 i------ 6,000 so dip do do 4,000 dill • all dill 2,000 Feb Mar Apr May R, Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec e2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec Cumulative Savings T,,Ig,t 2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Mountain View 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 1,600 ------ .... • 1,400 I 1,200 1 Y _t 1 1 1 1,000 40 00 dill xx xx r Boo x�x. xxx 1..1 x xx �'C 600 x x xx xx x x x x x x x-x xx x. x x, x, x.x-x x x x. --------I 400 x x 1- x----------- x. x x x x I x x x x. x.: 1. xx--A --A x -t--, . - 21 x x xx--,--1 x: x". xx x xx xx xx x x, L x- xx L- x -�-T L-. I-, •Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 11 2013 Monthly Use 2 Monthly Savings Target ■2014 Monthly Use • Notes Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. • Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February • Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable - Not Available • SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savings Santa Clato Valley • Water Distric,6 As of 1012012014 • • 24 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Palo Alto • 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Treated 2013 Monthly 2014 -a re;l 2014 Monthly Cumulative% 2013 Groundwater SFPUC O••�� 2014 - -. SFPUC Savings Feb to Water -- Use u�tat ar Use December • (al=savings • . 696,0 6960 Jon 868.3 8683 N/A . Feb = = 857.5 857.5 Feb = 586.0 = 586.0 32% Mar 943.0 943.0 Mar 763.1 763.1 25% Apr - - 1,237.3 - 1,237.3 Apr - - 1,204.1 - 1,204.1 16% May = = 1,479.7 = 1,479.7 May _ - 1,212.9 = 1,212.9 17% Jun 1,484.3 1,484.3 Jun 1,253.1 1,253.1 16% . Jul = = 1,340.2 = 1,340.2 Jul = - 1,352.4 - 1,352.4 13% Aug 1,520.7 1,520.7 Aug 1,122.9 1,122.9 15% Sep - = 1,237.3 _ 1,237.3 Sep* _ = 1,068.8 _ 1,068.8 15% Oct 1,041.1 1,041.1 Oct Nov 807.9 807.9 Nov Dec - - 791-2 - 791.2 Dec - - - - - Feb to Current _ 10,099.8 10,099.8 Feb to Current _ _ 8,563.4 - 8,563.4 Month Totals Month Totals February to %Savings by • December - - 12,740.0 - 12,740.0 Source of 15% 15% Total — L&2QIv • Palo Alto 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings 14,000 _..__ ___ _ • ,go 12,001 - r",- 8.000 _- / • x / - // / a' / 2.000 / Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • X2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target a 2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Palo Alto 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings • 1,600 —_ __ __ ___... . 1400 - - 1 -- 1,200 -__--- 1 -___-- ..-.' __� 1 —_— • 1 1 1 Ixx 1 Ixx I I..' 1 'xx 1 1 1,000 ._...................... --..1 1... -1 x x { Izx .1 x x I 1 xx __...� I —+ y, I�1 1 1 x 1 �xx I Ixx I I 1x 11 �i I'1 I I 1 I xx I x I Ixx I I] x I cz 1 1 yr 800 1 I IV. 1 Ixx I I Ixx I -y y 1 xx 1 1 1 xs-x 400 ._J x.x _.._J I x 1 x.x 1 x ___1 Izx I �xz -....._I x-x I —J xx .I x•. I x. 1 Ixx x 1 xx I xx 1 zz 1 xx x ; Ixx I Ix I zx Izx xx 1 ._ I 200 Y .. x z "'1 x x -- 1 x x -'-'-I '-'-Y -1 1 'xx I x x-x I x.a 1-_.*" L. -xx _..L�xz L r- {—lxx- L !xx .,..-. _. x-x xx • Feb Mar Ap Tar May Jun lul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec on 11 2013 Mthly Use 6 Monthly Savings get IN 2014 Monthly Use • Notes Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. • Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) • Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable • - Not Available SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savings In August 2014,all monthly data use was changed from SFPUC reported sales to Palo Alto provided data. •September water use is estimated by Palo Alto • �!f Dr�lldo • As of 10/21/2014 • • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 25 Purissima Hills 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • 2013 Cumulative% S Treated Treated 2014 2013 Groundwater SFPUC Other Monthly 2014 Groundwater SFPUC Other Savings Feb to Water Water Monthly Use Use December ,Hoar/m�a: n infer swings catculaGa�s - _-vailxes ore ,d it ;uvlugs-ku Orz,c..... (+1=savings Jan 77.0 77.0 Jan - 118.0 118.0 N/A Feb 130.0 130.0 Feb 71.9 71.9 45% . Mar 138.0 138.0 Mar 106.1 106.1 34% Apr 247.0 247.0 Apr 192.1 192.1 28% May 226.0 226.0 May 269.0 269.0 14% Jun 292.0 292.0 Jun 248.6 248.6 14% • Jul 261.0 261.0 Jul 249.0 249.0 12% Aug 313.0 313.0 Aug 242.0 242.0 14% • Sep 224.0 224.0 Sep` - Oct 182.0 182.0 Oct Nov 114.0 114.0 Nov Dec 111.0 111.0 Dec - - • Feb to Current Feb to Current 1,607.0 1,607.0 1,378.7 1,378.7 • Month Totals Month Totals February to %Savings by December 2,238.0 2,238.0 Source of 14% 14% • Total iSupply Purissima Hills 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings 2,500 • z.000 1'- I I �so'd � • am � i • 1.500 ................... _ -- -I _..... _ dop do do C so • a" 1,0a0 - ......... ../ I - - - - - ---- - do doll,soo • Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • .2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target �2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Purissima Hills • 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 350 -� 300 ------__. ..-_.... ____ _.._.. ___ ----_.__.--------------------- 250 I I _ r-I 1 1 • I 1 1 x I I I-1 I Ixxl I xx I-1 zao t � 1 xx 1 x.x I Ixx 1 Ixx I x.x I-I 150 _-J - J x 1 Ixx I z I x.x x x x I %x 1 Ixx 1 z-x I xa r- 100 I xx 1 zx I xx - I xx I Ixx 1 Ixx -I xz I %x - 1 x• 1 xY 1 x - I a 1 1 . I Ixx I 1 xx 1 I x."xx 50 x.x ; Ixx 1 xx __._.-1 x-x xx 1 z-x 1 N. 1 Yx I x'." I xa I xx I xx 1 xa I xs I z-% • L x x t xx x-x - _ x-x xY Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I1 2013 Monthly Use 9 Monthly Savings Target •2014 Monthly Use • Notes • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January • Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) . Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. • N/A=Not Applicable - Not Available SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savings $Ortta QOIO • IP4" Q • As of 10/21/2014 • 26 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • • • San Jose Municipal 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Ground Water Ground Water Treated 2013 Ground Water Ground Water Treated 2014 Cumulative% 2013 SFPUC 2014 SFPUC Savings Feb to • Zone 2 Zone 5 Water Monthly Use Zone 2 Zone 5 Water Monthly Use December • -. 1+1=savings m N/A • Feb 37.2 21.8 762.0 354.0 1,175.0 Feb 18.9 9.8 658.0 310.2 996.9 15% Mar 46.7 25.0 1,020.0 339.0 1,430.7 Mar 28.0 20.1 819.0 331.2 1,198.3 16% • Apr 67.8 30.9 1,278.0 414.0 1,790.7 Apr 28.7 29.1 973.1 393.7 1,424.7 18% May 39.9 27.9 1,653.0 540.0 2,260.8 May 45.6 34.8 1,478.7 520.4 2,079.5 14% • Jun 45.2 33.2 1,691.0 493.0 2,262.4 Jun 51.4 37.4 1,543.7 512.3 2,144.8 12% Jul 47.3 31.4 1,854.0 560.0 2,492.7 Jul 51.5 34.1 1,605.2 544.9 2,235.7 12% • Aug 50.8 36.5 1,750.0 574.0 2,411.3 Aug 60.2 46.2 1,486.6 524.0 2,117.0 12% Sep 33.6 31.3 1,530.0 466.0 2,060.9 Sep 51.9 34.1 1,262.4 463.9 1,812.3 12% Oct 36.3 44.0 1,380.0 461.0 1,921.3 Oct - - - - - • Nov 33.4 52.0 1,039.0 379.0 1,503.4 Nov - - - - - Dec 26.4 32.5 885.0 326.0 1,269.9 Dec - - - - - • Feb to Current 368.5 238.0 11,538.0 3,740.0 15,884.5 Feb to Current 336.2 245.6 9,826.7 3,600.6 14,009.2 Month Totals Month Totals • February to %Savings by • December 464.6 366.5 14,842.0 4,906.0 20,579.1 Source of 9% -3% 15% 4% 12% Total Supply .............__ San Jose Municipal 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings • I 15.000 -go-- -----.. ....__� dO 0 • do � • • b 10.000 I I� I� • 00 5,000 - -_________________-- - -- r .._...._..-___...____ - _ -__.. --_........................... _..._____- Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • 12013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec - O Cumulative Savings Target -2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec San Jose Municipal 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 3,000 • I I I I I I I I ......_.. ..._.._._ .----------- ---0 • 1 1 I 1 x I 1 1 1-t I- I 1 I xd I I 1 I 1 d 1 I I x-x 1 x x 1 I 1 f 1 1 • 12.000500 _� 1 Ixx t xx _--1-1- _ I 1 I f 1 1 1 I 1 I r-1 I I I I r i3 t xw x t x I t I x I x 1 xx 1 1.000 --1 .x .....1 J x H -1 --J I I xx I 11I ,.: I x 1 xx I .x I x I Ix.x I xx I 1 • 1 I x-, x x • 500 x x-x -x xx xa I 1 I I I Ix I 1 Ixx I I I jx I I 1 I 1 1 Ixx I I Ixx I I 1 Ixx r -_ 1. __ - _ Lxx- _ I_Ix. L. -1 x'x. . Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 11 2013 Monthly Use a Monthly Savings Target O 2014_ Monthly Use it + Notes • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) • Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. . N/A=Not Applicable Not Available SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savings • Santo Cloro Volley • V%tw District/) • Asof 10/16/20014 • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 27 San Jose Water Company 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target . Treated Surface 2013 Treated surface 2014 Cumulative% 2013 Groundwater SFPUC 2014 Groundwater SFPUC Savings Feb to Water Water Monthly Use Water Water Monthly Use December 1+)=savings • 4,480.0 5,121.0 Feb 1,859.2 4,169.4 - 1,384.8 7,413.4 Feb 4,169.0 2,993.0 - 0.3 7,162.3 3% • Mar 3,803.1 5,032.8 - 594.9 9,430.8 Mar 5,279.1 3,232.0 - 113.4 8,624.5 6% Apr 4,290.5 6,813.8 - 422.2 11,526.5 Apr 5,889.7 3,653.8 - 110.0 9,653.5 10% • May 5,374.1 8,703.1 - 298.6 14,375.8 May 8,087.0 4,902.0 - 54.9 13,043.9 10% • Jun 5,639.8 8,611.0 - 516.2 14,767.0 Jun 8,613.0 5,058.3 - 4.6 13,675.9 9% Jul 7,196.5 8,226.5 - 616.3 16,039.3 Jul 9,005.2 5,287.5 - 9.8 14,302.5 10% . Aug 6,690.5 8,325.2 - 584.1 15,599.8 Aug 7,288.5 5,858.8 - 404.9 13,552.2 10% Sep 5,448.8 8,035.9 - 530.6 14,015.3 Sep 6,585.8 5,413.3 - 9.8 12,008.9 11% Oct 5,572.2 7,066.3 - 501.5 13,140.0 Oct - - - - - Nov 4,970.5 5,059.1 - 326.0 10,355.6 Nov - - - - - • Dec 5,143.0 3,986.9 202.8 9,332.7 Dec - - - - Feb to Feb to • Current 40,302.5 57,917.7 - 4,947.6 103,167.8 Current 54,917.3 36,398.7 - 707.8 92,023.8 Month Totals Month Totals • February to %Savings by December 55,988.2 74,030.0 - 5,977.9 135,996.1 Source of -36% 37% - 86% 11% Total Supply San Jose Water Company 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings 140,000 ____ _.._._ _....... _.... _..__ _...._ _ _ • •120.000 - _.--....- ....._._— — — _ __ —do I� 100,000 --------------------- _._. __O • ---- I u Iw 000 ._. _----------_._..._-- e <" 60,000 --------.._.........--� — -------------------- • I 40,030 � • 20,000 Oro— Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec see 02013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec • Cumulative savings Target a 2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec -_ •San Jose Water Company 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 19,000 T __... ......... _...._. ___ ____ ____ 16.000 +}II ................................. ...._ ___ __._. __ -------------------------------- I 1 I—t • 14,0!10 I I I t fill, 1 � 1 1 12.000 ..._... ___.. __ _____ _ __1 1 _ __J .1 X i ..__.J __1 __ ._. ...... .....x% I xx I - I I I • 10.000 J 1 ._...1 .....1 xX 1 ____l }.x .... F x.x xX I x-x 's I x.x I xx I I I 8,000 J l- _.._.J r-x J xx 1 x 1 YY xx_I 1 xx I Y% xX 1 %%. I xp I Y} %x 6000 I Y.x --1 %-x _-__1. Y-% .I I xx __J 1.z .....1 xx .x.% 1 x.z I x-x I xx 1 %% I ax I X-} 1 X-x 4000 -1 x-% x-Y _.J x-% __I %a .._.....1 xx __J %-x —J x-x J Yx.._._.........I x.% i XX I i% Y-x 1 I I R-X I x-x I%x xx 2 000 ...J x.% ..J x.% J x-x J x x 1 x x .._...J x.x _J zx _.._.J xa ..... -x-% t xx %.% I xx 1 x 1 xx ,. 1 Yz 1 Xx Y.x X-x 1�%'X %.1 R3- XY Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 11 2013 Monthly Use ®Monthly Savings Target 1112014 Monthl/Use • Notes • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February • Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable - Not Available Sonto Cloro Valley • Water District© • As of 10/20/2014 • 28 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT Santa Clara (City) • 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Treated 2013 Treated 2014 Monthl Cumulative% 2013 Groundwater SFPUC Other 2014 Groundwater SFPUC Other Savings Feb to Water Monthly Use Water Use • December • -._ ._,.:. 41=savings N/A • Feb 735.0 370.0 219.0 1,324.0 Feb 787.0 262.0 176.0 1,225.0 7% Mar 951.0 428.0 199.0 1,578.0 Mar 950.4 285.0 198.6 1,434.0 8% • Apr 1,059.0 434.0 224.0 = 1,717.0 Apr 1,093.3 262.7 205.3 1,561.3 9% May 1,378.0 492.0 226.0 2,096.0 May 1,442.1 367.3 227.7 2,037.1 7% Jun 1,520.0 467.0 180.0 2,167.0 Jun 1,434.1 322.2 140.3 1,896.6 8% Jul 1,545.0 454.0 204.0 2,203.0 Jul 1,557.8 347.9 157.3 2,063.0 8% Aug 1,688.0 450.0 217.0 2,355.0 Aug 1,617.0 343.1 123.4 2,083.5 80/0 • Sep 1,233.0 442.0 183.0 = 1,858.0 Sep 1,235.8 1 324.7 141.8 = 1,702.3 8% Oct 1,301.0 428.0 234.0 1,963.0 Oct Nov 1,062.0 356.0 194.0 = 1,612.0 Nov Dec 933.0 342.0 173.0 1,448.0 Dec • Feb to - Feb to Current 10,109.0 3,537.0 1,652.0 15,298.0 Current 10,117.5 2,514.9 1,370.4 - 14,002.7 Month Totals Month Totals • February to %Savings by • December 13,405.0 4,663.0 2,253.0 20,321.0 Source of 011 29% 17% 8% Total Supply Santa Clara 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings 20,000 ---�.♦ ♦ • 15,0130 ,aoD ,�♦ � ---- ♦s Pie 10,000 _- -----'----- . a 5,0130 -- - ----- -- ---- - - -------------------_ Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • .=Monthly Savings Target • Cumulative Savings Target ..x.2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec Santa Clara 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 2,500 --.. _ --' _-_----I_.-----------.-.----------------------------- -- 2.000 .-_.._-_ __--__ _..__ r-I....;.- J 1- 1 I I -___._-- ......._ ......_. 11 _.I I i 1 I. I t , - I_1 • 1 I I I.. 1 xx I x I I I I Y -- - 1.500 _ x __-_. ...'--1 �4-_-i f -_-1 xx _.t I x ( _.1 % --I �x:�, }-___1 - ..-.i 1--_ 1 I Ixr .. i.... I I I I • 1,000 1 x.X. A-XX-:X- Feb x 1 M%�.. X-X i Ixx. sx SOD ........ -......._-t % t xz t %-X I IX.%. -% I XX 1 x%X I %Y I %%xx YX x.. - y %-x Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t4 2013 Monthly Use 0 Monthly Savings Target 012014 Monthly Use Notes _-__.----------------- • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January • Savings ta rgets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable • - Not Available SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savings Santa Clona Vag" • 11 al-D*06 As of 10/14/2014 • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 29 • • Stanford University • 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target Treated 2013 MOmhl Treated 2014 Cumulative% • ley,- Other 2014 Groundwater SFPUC Other Savines Feb to Groundwater Water -- Use - Water Month December January water use values are NOT used in water savings calculations January water use values are NOT used in water savings • (+1 savings or are use values. calculations or cumulative use values. 138.0 138.0 Jan 177.0 - 117.0 N/A Feb - - 180.0 180.0 Feb - - 137.0 137.0 24% • Mar - - 176.0 176.0 Mar - - 146.0 - 146.0 21% Apr 220.0 220.0 Apr 204.0 204.0 15% May - - 260.0 260.0 May - - 263.0 - 263.0 10% • Jun - - 246.0 246.0 Jun - - 222.0 - 222.0 10% Jul - - 218.0 218.0 Jul - - 239.2 - 239.2 7% • Aug 262.0 262.0 Aug- 218.5 218.5 8% Sep - - 215.01 215.0 Sep I - - - - • Oct 180.0 180.0 Oct Nov - - 172.0 172.0 Nov - - - - Dec 130.0 130.0 Dec - - Feb t0 Feb to • Current - - 1,562.0 - 1,562.0 Current - - 1,429.7 - 1,429.7 Month Totals Month Totals February to %Savings by • December - - 2,259.0 - 2,259.0 Source of 8% 8% Total supply I I I • Stanford 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Ux and Savings • 2.500 -_.._- ______ ____- _.___ ____. ......... l • 2.0110 I • Sq - • - - • - - •Feb Mar Ap May lun lul Aug Sep OR Nov Oec - �Q013 CululatlyeUXe Feb to Oec a G-180%2013 r2014C ulatiw Uw Febt00ec • Stanford • 2013 2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings 250 1 z<� 1 ; 1 t • I I 1 1 200 _._; .._; • •• I I I I 1 v t X. 1 xX I 1 I 1 t 1 1 � 150 ...J H- J 1.... y __! X- -..1 xX ._-1 F ...... ........... u 1 xX 1 xX I .X t x t xX t Xa 1 Xa I xX t Ixa t ' i t u I u X.X 1 X. t xX 1 xX I u t xi t xX t u I-t ' • I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I 1lp ....... so • 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I Xa xX � xX. xX xX Xa xl H x. xX X.X r............... Feb Mar T Apr May`^--- lun Jul Aug Sep OR N- 11 2013 M-thly ®Gw180%2013 02014 MOnMly USe ---------- • Notes Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. • Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February • Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. • Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. N/A=Not Applicable - Not Available • Potable Use only reported.SFPUC data does not match SFPUC billing records due to wheeling water to Stanford Hospital,which is in the Palo Alto service area Variations in month to month savings:Stanford's billing cycles vary on a monthly and yearly basis,and are not consistent with the amount of calendar days in each month. • When normalized for number of days in billing cycles,decreased,Stanford reports Domestic Water Savings of above the 10%shown above. 'August water use values are not available due to mid-month meter read schedule by SFPUC • • • • 30 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • • Sunnyvale , City 2013-2014 Water Use Compared to Target • Water 2013 2014 Cumulative% Water 2013 Groundwater SFPU Water Water SFPUC Water 2014 Groundwater SFPUC Monthly Savings Feb to • Treated Surface Treated Surface Use Use December January water use values are NOT used in water savings calculations or fanuary water use values are NOT used in water savings calculations or cumulative use values. cumulative use values. (+1=savings 732 '3 N/A • Feb 10.0 531.0 754.0 - 1,295.0 Feb 17.0 623.0 452.2 - 1,092.2 16% Mar 8.0 770.0 689.0 - 1,467.0 Mar 113.2 656.0 493.4 - 1,262.6 15% • Apr 10.0 898.0 898.0 1,806.0 Apr 225.5 626.0 597.0 1,448.5 17% May 8.0 1,101.0 1,195.0 - 2,304.0 May 283.0 840.4 912.0 - 2,035.4 15% • Jun 8.0 1,270.0 879.0 - 2,157.0 Jun 309.0 1,044.0 597.0 - 1,950.0 14% Jul 13.0 1,146.0 1,245.0 2,404.0 Jul 291.0 912.0 881.0 2,084.0 14% • Aug 9.0 1,055.0 1,242.0 = 2,306.0 Aug 268.0 750.0 982.0 = 2,000.0 14% Sep 11.0 983.0 965.0 1,959.0 Sep 242.0 710.0 764.0 1,716.0 13% • Oct 13.0 993.0 884.0 = 1,890.0 Oct - _ - _ _ Nov 11.0 842.0 704.0 1,557.0 Nov • Dec 11.0 780.0 523.0 - 1,314.0 Dec - - - - - Feb to Feb to Current 77,0 7,754.0 7,867.0 - 15,698.0 Current 1,748.6 6,161.4 5,678.6 - 13,588.6 Month Month Totals Totals February to %Savings by December 112.0 10,369.0 9,978.0 21,571.0 Source of -2171% 21% 28% 131 . Total Supply Sunnyvale 2013-2014 Cumulative Water Use and Savings • 25,000 _.._... • 20,000 _..- __-_ - ____- __... -._�'• _._.-. I� 15,000 _... __ _._._ _..... __....... �''I • Z • a - ..0 10.000 ......................._..... 00_dop I all :..... _--_-._"" _-..--......_.._.. • I dop do dop L --Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep act Nov Dec l e2013 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec ♦ Cumulative Savings Target w 2014 Cumulative Use Feb to Dec Sunnyvale 2013-2014 Monthly Water Use and Savings • 2,500 ..-...-.._....._...._......_...._......................................................._________ ---_____ -----------------__----_ • __ - I I I { I x.x I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I x N I 1 x 1 1 I 1 _- 1,500 xX x I X zx I I • M 1 Ixx I r I 1 zX I x-z x 1 Xx X-X 1,000 -1 xx i 1 % Yx 1 x-x 1 1 x 1 x� I 1 x 1 x I I xy x x 1 x 1 XX I I %x I I X. 1 500 1 1 x 1 I I x x J %-%x %x X-% x X x I X-x I x I x x kx I I z 1 Ixx 1 zx 1 x.. I x x I xx I -x 1 -X I x I f X. I a 1 xx 1 -X x% I Yx I x x'- x-x %d X. x% x-x x x • Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Ott Nov Dec 11 2013 Monthly Use 9 Monthly Savings Target ■2014 Monthly Use • Notes • Current monthly water use data is preliminary and subject to change. Savings targets for February are based on the district's 10%call for conservation made in January Savings targets for March through December are based on the district's 20%call for conservation made in February • Percent savings are shown in positive values where savings have been made and negative percent values where water use is higher than the base year period(2013) Cumulative%Savings shows the target savings for all months combined at that period in time. Recycled water not included in monthly analysis and will be analyzed separately.It is not included in the water savings target. • N/A=Not Applicable SorkG qua" - Not Available 1�IO w DW'jICto SFPUC-San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Sales.SFPUC 2014 Drought response is a call for voluntary 10%savings • As of 10/14/2014 i • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 31 This page intentionally left blank S 32 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Section Water Conservation Measures This section provides an overview of the water conservation measures taken by the, district municipalities and water retailers. • A. Santa Clara Valley Water District Measures • Since the district's call for water use reductions, the district has increased its water conservation outreach and education, and increased rebates for many of its programs, including: Landscape Conversion Rebate Program: rebates have increased to $2 per square foot • Irrigation Hardware Upgrades Rebate Program: several irrigation hardware rebates have 0 increased. • Graywater Laundry to Landscape Rebate Program: up to $200 per residential site for properly connecting a clothes washer to a graywater irrigation system. • Commercial Rebate Programs: several rebates for commercial facilities have increased, including the rebate for Connectionless Food Steamers, Commercial High-Efficiency Clothes • Washers and the Custom/Measured Rebate In addition, the district recently initiated a Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program to provide research grants to study and pilot-test new and innovative water conservation programs and efficient technologies. The program will provide $1 million over a 10 year period. Finally, the Board has authorized $1 .575 million for drought response outreach, $8 million to • support the increased rebate amounts, and $500,000 to fund water waste inspectors. B. Water Retailer Measures i i Local water retailers have responded to the district's call in various ways. Several retailers are calling for 20 percent reductions and have activated or adopted water use restrictions. Common 0 SFPUC retailers are calling for 10 to 15% percent voluntary. Most water retailers have taken additional action since August to respond to the State Water Resources Control Board's Emergency Regulations that were adopted in July 2014. Nearly every water retailer is increasing their outreach and education efforts. See the table on next page for a summary of these actions. 0 • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 33 fi • Water Retailer Measures . Water Retailer Call for Conservation Water Use Restrictions . California Water Service 20 percent Enacted Rule 14.1 restrictions Gilroy 20 percent Permanent restrictions plus Level 1 • Great Oaks 20 percent Enacted Rule 14.1 restrictions Milpitas 20 percent Permanent restrictions plus additional measures • Morgan Hill 20 percent Permanent restrictions plus Level 1 • Mountain View 10 percent Permanent restrictions plus Stage 1 and some Stage 2 • Palo Alto 10 percent Permanent restrictions plus additional Stage 1 measures Purissima Hills Water 10 percent Permanent restrictions • San Jose Municipal Water 20 percent Permanent restrictions plus Stage 1. San Jose Water Company 20 percent Enacted Rule 14.1 restrictions Santa Clara 20 percent Permanent restrictions plus Plan 2. Stanford 10 percent N/A • Sunnyvale 15 percent Permanent restrictions plus Stage 1 34 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Water Conservation Measures C. Other Municipality Measures (non retailer cities and the County) Some of the cities or towns in Santa Clara County do not have a municipal water system. They are served by investor owned water retail agencies. However, many of them are moving forward with . their own actions to influence water use reductions in their communities. City(non municipal Action Outreach • water retailer) • Campbell, City of The City Council conducted a Water saving tips on website and in city newsletter. • special study session on water and has directed staff to craft a drought ordinance,explore turf conversion policies with their • Parks and Recreation Commission, and return to Council with recommendations on both. Permanent water use restrictions in place. Saratoga, City of Adopted Resolution calling for Water saving tips on website,with links to SJWC and . 20% reduction in water use. SCVWD water conservation and rebate programs. • Adopted updated Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance based on . two local model ordinances. • Los Altos, City of Adopted Resolution calling for Resolution includes voluntary measures consistent with 20% reduction in water use. model ordinance Water efficient landscape • regulations in place. Los Altos Hills,Town of Water efficient landscaping Support SCVWD and retailer efforts. Water regulations in place. Town staff conservation information on Town website. reviewing Town ordinances • pertaining to water conservation. Los Gatos,Town of Water efficient landscaping Water saving tips and information on SCVWD water regulations in place. conservation rebate programs on website. Cupertino Permanent water waste measures Released Fact Sheet: 2014 Drought and Water • and landscaping ordinance in Conservation Fact Sheet place. Staff exploring a resolution http://www.cupertino.org/Modules/ShowDocument.as calling for 20% reduction in water px?documentid=8044 use. Drought Resources page on city website. • Monte Sereno, City of Water conservation and City released newsletter in Spring detailing SJW's Rule • landscaping regulations in place. 14.1 restrictions that are in effect city-wide. County of Santa Clara Adopted resolution calling for Distributing District drought/conservation flyers in their • 20%. Board Committee approved tax bills(over 500,000 over 5 months). . draft drought ordinance; Board of Supervisors to review next with public meetings to follow; • Adoption anticipated in November. • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 35 S This page intentionally left blank 36 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Section Drouqht Response • • The district's comprehensive drought response is being implemented through fifteen strategies grouped into four general categories: (A) water supply and operations; (B) water use reduction; (C) drought response opportunities; and (D) administrative and financial management. • A. Water Supply and Operations • 1. Secure imported water supplies. This strategy includes working with state and federal project operators (California Department of Water Resources and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) and contractors of the State Water Project (SWP) and Central Valley Project (CVP) to secure the district's 2013 contract carryover supplies and 2014 contract allocations. It also includes supporting i initiatives to control Delta salinity; providing for return of water from the Semitropic Water Bank; determining the availability of supplemental water transfers and imported water carryover for 2015; and coordinating with San Francisco Public Utilities . Commission (SFPUC) on drought impacts to the Hetch-Hetchy Project. 2. Manage and deliver available raw water supplies. This strategy optimizes distribution of limited local and imported supplies, including deliveries to the three water treatment plants, operation of reservoirs and the groundwater recharge system, and deliveries to untreated surface water users. Given S 2014 water supply conditions, ongoing communication is required with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders regarding changing conditions in reservoirs, creeks • and recharge ponds, as well as working with untreated surface water customers to • establish alternate sources of supply. 3. Optimize treated water quality and availability. This strategy focuses on optimizing treatment plant operations and source water supplies to meet drinking water quality and reliability objectives, in coordination with the district's retail treated water contractors. It includes continuing to meet treated water quality objectives despite poorer water quality conditions in the Delta this year, and projected low storage levels in San Luis Reservoir that will affect both the quality of this • source of supply as well as potentially even the ability to pump water from the reservoir • during the late summer and early fall months. This strategy also includes operating the • Campbell Well Field to augment supplies in the West Pipeline and working with SFPUC to use the Hetch-Hetchy Intertie when necessary to meet treated water schedules. Staff is 0 continuing to work with retailers to reduce treated water use to the targeted level of 80 percent of the original contract quantities. • • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 37 B. Water Use Reduction 4. Reduce 2014 water use by 20 percent compared to 2013 water use. This strategy includes promoting short-term and long-term actions to reduce water use in 2014 and tracking progress toward achieving the 20 percent target set b the Board 9P 9 9 P g Y � on February 25, 2014. Activities include promoting the district's water conservation programs; coordinating with retail water agencies, municipalities and the County of • Santa Clara on drought response ordinances and programs; and implementing a public • outreach and education campaign. 5. Ensure that district facilities set a model for water conservation. Many water conservation measures have been implemented at district facilities in past years, including low flow toilets, dual flush valves in high use areas, low flow aerators on faucets in restrooms and break areas, low flow devices in showers, drought tolerant landscaping and/or native vegetation, and 'Calsense' intelligent irrigation controllers for landscaping. In 2013, the district reduced water use by 1 1 percent (10.8 million • gallons) compared to 2012 (12.1 million gallons). In 2014, the district will expedite • additional actions that may serve as a model for achieving water savings, and reduce • water use at district facilities by more than the countywide 20 percent water use reduction target. 6. Support customers and key stakeholders to minimize adverse drought impacts. This strategy includes providing assistance to retail water agencies for their outreach, operations and conservation programs. The district meets regularly with the Water Retailers and subcommittees (Water Supply, Treated Water, Water Quality, • Groundwater, Conservation, Communication and Ad Hoc Drought Response Subcommittees). Assistance is also being provided to surface water customers, • agricultural water users, municipalities and others as they implement drought response. The Landscape Advisory Committee is convened to discuss drought response as it affects landscape businesses. This strategy includes tracking and reporting customer and stakeholder requests. C. Drought Response Opportunities 7. Leverage community awareness to advance long-term conservation measures. • This strategy includes measures that may be taken in 2014 to increase participation in . the district's long-term water conservation programs. It also identifies, evaluates and • supports new innovative conservation measures, including Safe Clean Water (SCW) • Water Conservation Research Grant efforts, which may be implemented in calendar year 2015. Staff is also investigating opportunities for advancing sustainable, long-term savings through land use initiatives, where feasible. 38 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • �4 2 8. Accelerate recycled water program development and implementation. The current drought has raised interest in expediting implementation of both non- potable and potable reuse components of the district's Water Master Plan by existing and potential recycled water partners, legislators, water users and others. Staff is S identifying and preparing high-priority recycled water projects (up to 10 million gallons • per day) to make them shovel-ready within the next 12 months; pursuing regulatory • proposals to provide for safe implementation of indirect and direct potable reuse projects; and completing master planning of all recycled water efforts. Other aspects of this strategy include support and pursuit of legislative proposals to streamline the implementation of recycled projects and provide potential funding. 9. Leverage opportunity to maintain uniquely accessible district facilities. Many district facilities are expected to be more accessible this year for inspections and • maintenance, given the limited surface water in district reservoirs and limited raw water • operations. For example, some groundwater recharge ponds that have been in • continuous service for decades may be drained completely this year providing opportunity for cleaning and refurbishment. This strategy takes advantage of unique i conditions in 2014 to expedite work and advance district asset management. This strategy also includes installation of meters for untreated surface water accounts and pursuing metering of un-metered wells as long-term measures that will improve water accounting and drought response. • 10. Leverage opportunity to further development of the district's workforce. . Effective drought response requires shifting staff resources to meet current needs, and • this also creates opportunity for staff to gain new knowledge, skills and abilities. This strategy includes establishing processes for fair and expedited re-allocation of staff resources to assist with implementation of drought response so that the district is better able to serve the public this year and in future years through workforce development. 11 .Advance community knowledge, awareness, and understanding of the water supply system i and services provided by the district. • This strategy includes efforts to expand outreach communication and engagement with • general public and working even more closely with media to convey drought and water • conservation messages. This also provides an opportunity to expand outreach to key stakeholders (e.g., city councils) and regional groups. D. Administrative and Financial Management 12. Secure Federal and State legislative support to offset drought impacts and accelerate conservation and recycling programs. • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 39 Staff is tracking a number of State and federal legislative initiatives aimed at providing drought relief and funding to offset costs of drought response and accelerate water supply and water use efficiency projects. This strategy focuses on grant application requirements and project eligibility to maximize funding opportunities for district and customer projects and programs. It also includes pursuing funding and reimbursements for district projects and programs, and collaborative opportunities to assist customers • with offsetting financial impacts of the drought. P 9 13. Leverage Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to assist in supporting drought efforts. Soon after the Governor's January 17, 2014, Declaration of Drought Emergency, the district activated its EOC at Level 1 to facilitate response to drought-status inquiries from i the State Operations Center (SOC), Coastal Regional Operations Center (REOC) and the local, Santa Clara County Operational Area (OA). Emergency resource requests may be requested through the EOC, as determined by the district's EOC Director, and the EOC also helps track drought-related costs for potential reimbursement. The EOC communication structure provides opportunity for additional outreach to policy and staff • representatives of local municipalities, the county and emergency response providers about the need to achieve the 20 percent water use reduction target and to promote water conservation. 14. Adjust district resource allocations necessary to respond to drought. This strategy includes identifying, tracking and processing budget adjustments and other adjustments of resources as needed to support overall implementation of drought response. In addition to staff resource adjustments discussed in Strategy#10, drought . response is expected to include increased/adjusted budgets for an effective water use • reduction campaign, additional pumping and water treatment costs, extraordinary • maintenance projects, and supplemental imported water. The strategy includes clearly identifying the schedule impacts and other impacts of these resource adjustments as non- drought-related work is delayed or removed from project work plans. r 15. Support the Board of Directors. This strategy includes ensuring that the Board is provided timely and accurate information on 2014 water supply conditions and drought response to support their • efforts and linkages to the community. This strategy includes support for the Board Ad • Hoc Conservation Committee and Ad Hoc Recycled Water Committee to discuss • drought-related opportunities to advance these important programs. It also includes ensuring that Board advisory committees are informed of 2014 water supply, drought response measures, and implementation of the 2014 water use reduction campaign. Board updates are provided monthly on 2014 water supply and drought response, including progress toward achieving the 20 percent water use reduction target. 40 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • Section 5. Data Collection Methodology This section describes how water use data is collected by the district for the monthly drought response status report. A. Water Use Data Disclaimer • Due to the need to communicate retailer water use data and savings progress in a timely manner, water use data in this report is currently being self reported by the retailer and is subject to further QA/QC and verification, may not match district billing records and is therefore subject to change. The intent of this report is to illustrate a general month by month and cumulative trend in water use and savings efforts toward the goal of a 20 percent reduction in water use compared to the same i period in 2013. Below is how the district typically would collect and store water use data. B. Treated Water Data • The district measures the volume of treated water delivered to its treated water customers (major water retailers). Monthly treated water deliveries are measured by meters (scheduled, contract, non- ! contract, and total delivered) for each and all water retailers (contractors). Meters are recalibrated/maintained regularly and may error up to 2 percent. Otherwise, the water use values represent actual billed amounts. For this report, treated water data is being reported by retailers. C. Groundwater Data • The groundwater data collection and reporting process includes sending a water production • statement to the customer for them to complete and report their water use. Once the completed production statement data is reviewed and accepted by the district, the district considers the data to be validated. This process which was developed in consideration of the requirements of the district Act, results in at least a 6 week delay in groundwater production reporting. For this report, groundwater data is being reported by retailers. D. SFPUC Water Data • The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) has eight common retail water customers with • the district. SFPUC reports monthly water use directly to the district (historically that data was • provided to BAWSCA, who in turn provided it to the district). Five of the common customers have their metered deliveries measures by SFPUC at the beginning of the month. Three of the customers ` (Purissima Hills, Stanford and Palo Alto) have their meters read on the 18'x' or 19", and therefore their monthly data is split between two months. For the purposes of this report, water use for the month, will be that water used as measured by the following month (i.e. March water use is water • OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT 41 ® a ® • a sus s � use measured in April). It should be noted that the SFPUC provides monthly billing reports labeled as Monthly Water Sales. That data contains water sold and used in the previous month (i.e. March Water Sales report contains February use data for the many of the customers, including the five common customers whose meters are read on the first of March, for instance). For this report, groundwater data is being reported by retailers. • E. Surface Water Data • For the purpose of this report, surface water data represents water use by large water retailers and does not include surface water deliveries by the district to its non-potable surface water customers. The retail customers included in the surface water section include San Jose Water Company and Stanford University who both have surface water rights. San Jose Water Company has its own water treatment plant for their surface water and Stanford uses their surface water for non-potable uses. They both report their surface water use data to the district. F. Recycled Water Use Historically, recycled water use has been tracked in-county by sales at the treatment plants. However, for the purposes of this report, an effort is being made to collect this data at the water retailer level. This requires even more coordination and participation with the recycled water retailers. Many of the water retailers do not read their meters monthly and therefore their recycled water use is not reported in this monthly report. It is important to know how county water savings may be accommodated by increases in water use. If the data can be collected monthly it will be reported as such, otherwise it will be reported in the semiannual and annual reports, as available. S 42 OCTOBER 2014 DROUGHT STATUS REPORT • 0 3 0 `o v s v 0 N C •' rn Q V c o a Q V O H N w C O - a `► o W jj�r^ 3 N 3 O O W OC O ` \fir/J U .� ` F� /� C 00 V1 - O ma 0 Q g .4 y a `� W O O F �' N W G o Ol M o Q N V '� ° O Cl c o o p .o U Q Op O �y ,L a� O Z V 'o � � O O w a� U O �_ 3 i W O P '= 4' 3 N �1 AX Y ° U °° o f a la" vz � 3 I► � ~ ,O Q uJ W a 3 0 w o0 OD a a 'a' 3 ° U V w WNW. += o DC 3 U "z O W a y COQ a _ a -o o CL� � R o = � N W � � W N Q = o a> y �LL C1 � � 3 a v o Z W OZ J V o GC D a QN W6 � � wN � qQW 3 � a3r � x a Q p Lop, G a V LLA -� o n 3 o c N � v 3 = w 3 u� Q a o 0 0 W o > a� y 2 F. W '� w V 00 w a E 09 yQWu o a� =' 0 Q Q Q Q W c N o o o Q W 3 v = o n L r m Lu U V) L o W � Q o Q9 o o o 0 3 N O O y V Q � y Q� C Q k