CC Resolution No. 15-101 Approving a Policy to Allow the Use of Electronic Signatures on City Documents RESOLUTION NO. 15-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A POLICY TO ALLOW THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
(E-SIGNATURES) ON CITY DOCUMENTS
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
This resolution authorizes the use of electronic signatures on City documents.
SECTION II:
WHEREAS, federal and state regulations have provided sufficient guidelines to
allow for the implementation of electronic content, electronic transactions and electronic
signatures; and
WHEREAS, technology has developed to a level of sophistication to enable
secure and verifiable electronic signatures; and
WHEREAS, Cupertino continues to be a regional environmental leader, offering
award-winning, grant-funded, publically-recognized programs, policies and services
that are sought after and modeled by adjacent communities; and
WHEREAS, Cupertino's commitment to the environment and waste-reduction is
evidenced by its City's Climate Action Plan, General Plan Sustainability Element, Green
Purchasing Policy, Green Events Policy, Green Building Ordinance, and Green Business
Program; and
WHEREAS, Cupertino encourages conservation by sharing sustainability tips
(e.g. "think before you print") including, a website Cupertino.org/green; and
WHEREAS, the use of e-signatures and digital signatures in City business will
not only increase efficiency for staff, but also will provide a layer of convenience and
efficiency for City residences who are in need of City services; and
WHEREAS, the state legislature adopted AB2188 regarding the streamlining for
solar panel permits which recognizes the City's ability to accept "electronic" signatures;
and
WHEREAS, the California Secretary of State has issued an opinion that the
"digital" signature requirements of the Secretary of State Regulations (2 CCR 22000, et
seq.) do not apply to the use of "electronic" signatures;
WHEREAS, the City Manager will oversee and determine, with the
recommendation of the City Attorney and the Information Technology Director, or
other designee, the appropriate use of electronic signatures for City documents; and
Resolution No. 15-101
Page-2
WHEREAS, adoption of an electronic signature policy is not a project subject to
environmental review.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of staff reports, public comments, and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the City Council does:
1. The above recitations are true and correct.
2. The City Council E-Signature Policy is adopted as shown in Exhibit A to this
resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino the 17th day of November 2015, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Sinks, Chang, Paul, Vaidhyanathan, Wong
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
at/S:24E6,2kt , - $ an
Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Rod Sinks, Mayor, City of Cupertino
Resolution No.15-101
Page-3
. Exhibit A
CITY OF CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TO ALLOW THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES (E-SIGNATURES) ON CITY
•
DOCUMENTS
Purpose
To enable the City of Cupertino to accept an approved electronic signature, in lieu of a
written signature, on a document in which a signature is required or used, in
compliance with the law. This policy does not supersede laws that specifically require a
written signature. This policy does not limit the right or option to conduct the
transaction on paper or in non-electronic form and the right to have documents
provided or made available on paper.
Background
The use of electronic signatures on legally binding documents has become increasingly
prevalent in the private sector but has yet to find widespread adoption by public
entities. The benefits of electronic signatures are simple and numerous: they cut down
on the paper, time and cost associated with transmitting and approving physical
documents, and they can offer an easily accessible audit trail of the modification,
editing, and approval/signature of documents.
This policy will authorize the use of electronic signatures on the City of Cupertino
documents while allowing the city to strike a balance between flexibility and the need
for signature security and integrity.
POLICY
1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City of Cupertino accepts e-signatures as
legally binding and equivalent to handwritten signatures to signify an agreement in
compliance with the law.
2. This policy applies to all employees of the City of Cupertino, and governs all uses of
electronic signatures and electronic records used to conduct the official business of
the City of Cupertino. Such business may include, but not be limited to electronic
communications, transactions contracts, permits and other official purposes, both
internal and external to the city, except that contracts that require Council
authorization will continue to require digital or wet (manual) signatures. The City
Manager may in any circumstance determine that a particular transaction be
conducted by a digital or wet (manual) signature.
Resolution No.15-101
Page-4
3. Where a city policy requires that a record have the signature of an authorized
person that requirement is met when the electronic record has associated with it an
electronic signature using a city approved electronic signature method.
4. Where a city policy requires a written document, that requirement is met when an
electronic record has associated with it an electronic signature using a city approved
electronic signature method.
5. The City of Cupertino's right to option to conduct a transaction on paper or in non-
electronic form shall not affect the City of Cupertino's right, option or obligation to
have documents provided or made available in paper format.
6. Approved and automated processes for a City of Cupertino transaction are
automatically subject to the provision of this policy.
7. Periodic reviews will be implemented for appropriateness and continued
applicability of electronic signatures.
8. If the parties have agreed to conduct a transaction by electronic means, the parties
are required to utilize the city's electronic signature system for approved,
electronically signed documents and that all applicable security processes for.
authentication be followed.
9. Where a legal requirement beyond city policy requires a written document that
requirement is met when an electronic record has associated with it an electronic
signature using an approved electronic signature method, which complies with
California state law.
10. Appropriate procedures must be used to confirm that the person signing the record
has the appropriate authority.
11. This policy applies only to transactions between parties which have agreed to
conduct transactions by electronic means with the use of the city's approved
electronic signature method.
12. If parties have agreed to conduct a transaction by electronic means and a law
requires a person to provide, send, or deliver information in writing to another
person, the requirement is satisfied if the information is provided, sent or delivered,
in an electronicrecord capable of retention by the recipient at the time of receipt. An
electronic record is not capable of retention by the recipient of the sender or its
Resolution No. 15-101
Page-5
information processing system inhibits the ability of the recipient to.print or store
the electronic record.
13. This policy shall not apply to any transaction that requires a person's signature to be
signed in the presence of a notary public.
14. The final approval of any electronic signature method will be by the City Manager
with the recommendation of the City Attorney and the Information Technology
Director, or other designee. In determining whether to approve an electronic
signature method, consideration will be given to the systems and procedures
associated with using that electronic signature, and whether the use of the electronic
signature is at least as reliable as the existing method being used.
15. In the event that it is determined that an approved electronic signature method is no
longer trustworthy, the City Manager must revoke the approval of that electronic
signature method. If there is continued significance for the electronic signatures,
which used the revoked method, the City Manager will take steps to see that any
valid records signed with the revoked electronic signature method are signed again
either with a written signature or with an approved electronic signature method.